No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA85-044BEGINNING OF FILE fl. .. MICROFILMED St .itsb ee S - o14- a3. . Public Notice Public Notice NOTICE OF storefront buildings totalling 85,200 square ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION feet for office and warehouse use on a 6.5 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COM- acre site, file SA-044-85; located on the MITTEE east side of Powell Avenue S.W. at the RENTON, WASHINGTON 550-600 block. The Environmental Review Committee HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING (ECF- ERC) has issued a declaration of non- 066-85) WASHINGTON TECHNICAL significance for the following projects: CENTER—Phase 213.Application for site CITY OF RENTON, PARKS 8 RECRE- plan approval to allow the construction of aAFFIDAVITOFPUBLICATIONDEPARTMENT (ECF-073-85) one,two-story tilt-up concrete building andPantherCreekMosquitoAbatement — two, one-story tilt-up concrete buildingsThesubjectprojectproposesaerialtreat- totalling 60,300 square feet for office and ment of up to sixty-five acres of wetlands warehouse use file SA-045-85;located onAudreyDaJoie , being first duly sworn for the purpose mosquito abatement; the south side of S.W. 7th Street at the he/she is the Chief Clerk of the located east of the Valley Freeway (SR- 1100-1200 block. 167) and west of Talbot Hill, and in KEMPER MULLINS (ECF-043-85) Ap-between 1-405 to the north and S.W.43rd plication to rezone approximately 3.67StreettothesouthinanareaknownastheacreaofpropertyfromG-1 to B-1 for future VALLEY NEWSPAP Panther Creek Wetlands. commercial use,file R-026-85;located on CITY OF RENTON, PUBLIC WORKS the north side of N.E. Sunset Boulevard DEPARTMENT (ECF-074-85) Union Av- and approximately 116 feet east ofDailyNewsJournal, Daily Record Chronicle, 1: enue N.E. Resurfacing — The subject Anacortes Avenue Northeast. project proposes approximately 4,000 line- Further information regarding this actionDailynewspaperspublishedsix (6) times a week. al feet of roadway improvements including is available in the Building and Zoning are legal newspapers and are now and have be installing curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm Department, Municipal Building, Renton, sewers,and widening from two lanes to 44 Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal ofmonthspriortothedateofpublicationreferredto, feet curb to curb; located along Union ERC action must be filed with the KingintheEnglishlanguagecontinuallyasdailynew; Avenue N.E. from N.E. Sunset Boulevard County Superior Court by July 22, 1985. County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have b to N.E. 25th Street. Published in the Daily Record ChronicleGARYMERLINOCONSTRUCTIONJuly8, 1985 R1000 newspapers ly order of the Superior Court of the S CO. (ECF-072-85) Application for special King County. permit for fill and grade to allow modifica- tion of Phase I granted (SP-019-84; 100,000 cubic yards left to be excavated) The notice inthe exact form attached, was public and to allow excavation of 180,000 cubic yards of material for Phase II and to refill Journal , Daily Record Chronicle X , Daily the two sites with approximately 380,000 cubic yards of material, file SP-048-85;not in supplement form) which was regular located at the southwest and southeast subscribers during the below stated period. corners of Greenwood Memorial Cemetery Notice of Environmental Determint at3E N.E. Street. SERVICE LLININEN SUPPLY (ECF-061- use permitto on July 3, 1985 R10( alllow85) pp the at xpansonfor cod ofnal commercial laundry(light industrial use)in a B-1 zoned district, and to allow the required parking for said expansion to be located within 500 feet of the laundry building,file CU-039-85;The full amount of the fee charged for said foreg located at 903 South 4th Street. HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING (ECF-sum of $ 57 .91 _ 066-85) WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - Phase 3. Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of four, one-story tilt-up concrete and glass Subscribed and sworn to before me this 12th day of July 19 85 CITY OF ;,pA:-,, 0 T n rj:I_ U Cd(7, 7'.-.' '' Z s / i__ i1 i1 AUG 61985 ,____J Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, BUILDING/ZON„Atff DEFTKingCounty, Washington. VN 4187 Revised 10/84 A OF A'4, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT4-' z Z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTORNAL MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09ltfQ SEP1 BARBARA Y. SI-INPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: January 14, 1986 TO: Files (All Holvick, deRegt and Koering (HDK) and First City Equity Files) FROM: 3.1oo er J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT.. DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT 'Bs OF SPRINGBROOK TECHNICAL CENTER The ERC i:onditions at the time of plat approval required the dedication and construction of Oakesdale Avenue (2 lanes) along the west side of Tract 'B' from S.W. Seventh Street to S.W. Grady Way prior to the development of Tract 'B'. Development of the parcels adjacent t) Tract 'B' by First City Equities and Holvick, deRegt and Koering (HDK) have been short of parking spaces on existing lots. In order to accommodate proposed parking, lot line ac justments have been approved in which a portion of Tract 'B' is added to the adjacent lbs. These lot line adjustments for parking lot areas raised the question of whether O,Ikesdale needed to be constructed. On October 30, 1985, the ERC upon review of a new traffic analysis determined that "... parking lots can be constructed on Parcel B without the implementation of the condition to constru':t Oakesdale Avenue. This interpretation does not include the construction of any buildings." H0Lu I 0 (12 PvgE ki ert 11g.-113i Ll 11T5 RJB:JSM:s.i PP. F0-8 25A 2156Z syN 41 35 Fet f 1P gl mu', so COS t53kW) h-g5 0t srt.6[6- cf Fa sA-uu [ HIL • 51\--kotfi51 HIV 3ri' re-3 H 43-6 Imo, 1.u5,n45 OF R4,'1r THE CITY OF RENTONc) t$ 42_ 7, Z y MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER co- FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235 - 2593 O9g7-E-D SE PZE O P August 27, 1985 Mr. Lore-) Davis 1000 S.W. 7th Renton, Wa. 98055 RE: File No. SA-044-85; Holvick, deRegt, Koering Dear Mr. Davis: The Exa niner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published on August 12, 1985 has not been appealed within the I4-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely. aLk.Vo-,‘ Fred J. Ka man Hearing E xaminer FJK:dk 1075E cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of King DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 12th day of August 1985, affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /7 /2/day of 4 G c_s 1 1985. do-Lam ,621! „X6, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at h E/UT,nJ therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: SA-044-85 - Holvick, deRegt , Koering The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) 1055E August 12, 1985 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING FILE NO. SA-044-85 LOCATION: 1000 block of Powell Avenue S.W. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Site Plan approval to allow construction of four one-story tilt-up concrete and glass store front buildings totalling 85,200 square feet, for office and warehouse use, on 6.5 acres. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval Hearing Examiner Decision: Site Plan shown as Exhibit #3 is approved. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on July 30, 1985. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on August 6, 1985, at 9:55 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and other documents pertaining to this application. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan Exhibit #2 - Revised Site Plan The hearing opened with the above request being reviewed by Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator. The following information was presented. On approximately 6.5 acres of property the applicant proposes to build 4 one-story buildings totalling 85,200 sq. ft. of warehouse and office space. These are two platted lots and sole access is from Powell S.W.. Mr. Blaylock offered 6 Site Plan review criteria to be discussed for all Site Plan proposals, in an effort to be consistent in the review process. The matters to be reviewed are compatibility with adjacent structures; complaince with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code; access, functionality of a parking lot; traffic and pedestrian circulation. Mr. Blaylock reviewed staff comments in the 6 areas noting the Site Plan does not show how it will intertie with adjacent manufacturing developments by providing pedestrian corridors linking the buildings. The parking lot is designed for the maximum amount of parking spaces but the Site Plan is not specific with dimension requirements and does not allow for conversion of warehouse space. It was noted that all of the buildings in the previous development at Washington Technical Center have been converted from manufacturing and warehousing to office due to demand, and there is no adjacent land left that is useable for access or parking for the future. This statement was placed into the record to put the applicant on notice that they may have problems with future expansion proposals. Continuing with the review it was pointed out that the plan meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code, but there is not much outside open space provided for people. It is felt this matter needs to be addressed more in depth by the applicant. Mr. Blaylock stated the Fire Department expressed concern over the emergency access and circulation matters and the Utility Engineering Department is concerned about water and sewer plans for the proposed site. It is the belief of staff that the application should be continued to permit the applicant to prepare and submit more specific plans to show pedestrian circulation, specific parking layouts, and compliance with Holvick, deRegt, Koering SA-044-85 August 12, 1985 Page 2 on-site circulation for emergency access. He stated the Building Department would withhold a final recommendation until the applicant made his presentation to the Examiner this date. Calling for testimony in support of this application from the applicant or their representative, speaking was: Keith Maehlum, Architect The Maehlum Group 14108 24th S.E. Mill Creek, Washington, 98102 Mr. Maehlum submitted a revised Site Plan as an exhibit. He advised the Examiner that the applicant has tried to provide the pedestrian circulation and interties as recommended by the City. He stated all the buildings have sidewalks along the frontage and provide pedestrian connections through the parking lots to the buildings. He reviewed the traffic circulation shown on the new site plan and feels as now proposed is adequate, with future access points also shown. Circulation on-site is around all buildings, and the access does comply with the Fire Department requirements as pertains to width and turning radius. Mr. Maehlum referred to accessibility and the open space as referred to in the Comprehensive Plan. Landscaping is more than required by City code and reference was made to a retention pond on the original Washington Technical Center development that is now located on the First City Equities property. Mr. Maehlum stated if the City would like to recommend additional features on the site that are not now shown, the applicant would be willing to consider them so they may move ahead with this proposal. The Hearing Examiner called for further testimony in support of the application. Wishing to speak was: Loren Davis 1000 S.W. 7th Renton, Wa. 98055 Mr. Davis testified that the applicant will have no problem with the City's recommendation to provide pedestrian corridors and traffic circulation. They are in the process of completing final drawings for this proposal and requested approval of this Site Plan as revised. Mr. Davis commented on open space developments and feel they have provided additional landscaping above what is usually seen in comparable projects within the City. He indicated at the time the Washington Technical plat was approved, 17 acres of the P-1 Channel retention pond was dedicated to the City and will also become open space. Calling for further support for this application, there was none. There was no one in the audience wishing to speak in opposition to this application. Comments from staff were received from Mr. Blaylock advised that staff would now recommend approval of this project subject to the Fire Department approving the turning radius provided. It was clarified that future access could be obtained through Lot #1, currently owned by the applicant. It is felt the concerns of staff have now been met with the submittal of the new Site Plan. The Examiner again called for testimony from the audience or general comments from staff. No one else wished to speak, the hearing closed at 10:15 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Holvick, deRegt, Koering, has requested approval of a Site Plan which includes four one-story tilt-up concrete and glass store front buildings. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered in the record as Exhibit #1. Holvick, deRegt, Koering SA-044-85 August 12, 1985 Page 4 DECISION The site plan (Exhibit #3) is approved. ORDERED THIS 12th day of August, 1985. FRED J. KAU AN HEARING EXA INER TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of August, 1985 to the parties of record: Keith Maehlum, Architect The Maehlum Group 14108 24th S.E. Mill Creek, Wa. 98102 Loren Davis 1000 S.W. 7th St. Renton, Wa. 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of August, 1985 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Jim Matthew, Fire Marshal Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before August 26, 1985. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. 1; 1 ____.-1_ ___ _____ ____ _ ____ _ _ ___ _______ = ___..---- ---- -4,..- ___--...,„.„--- ---' _ _. _ . ..11-31- ..,,,, i .,:,\\\„,,‘ .\\,.:2.,,, 7\„,\\.•\,,,,.\,,,,,,- \N.,,,,, , 1-_-.----- k, ,,. \„ •,\„.•\x,,,,,,,• \, ,. .\\\,.,\ ,\ ,, .. ..,‘. ., .. T 1 ! ! i i I .• ,•,.., • \\ \ ,•,,,,\ s ., ,.‘ ,„,•,,..\. \\\,‘,\\,\, \•;. , ,,,, .\ i—I - VAHH1 I i 1 l i b i vz yi v` ro fat-- z P , , sr,71 I r 4 , P103.. MIMI VMl7M1Z WIN g14C/IIMe MafW J Nic.,•-2 3aflLRi I M I i w 111_ _. 1 a" 7 " y-- T — — —- - - - - - -- - — 1 ' A r•'r c J t L t'7a-' `',`i,J s 1....C15.9 1..2 LU Z in O T' _-' !a I a -... ire --- .. 1 u o I 5 6 111 II) 1 1 or/ 1 f . co {rAwy 34* All I. c MCI a/- U.S.--,.c;..,,.,) ' P -: ' T V..: , LA 284131 SF I3r _`»t _ .. t`— 1 BUILDING 85,200 SE v— mak`':..:,.T,..9,dfi.I Iñi7> 1 I i O i I 3'_. I 1 RATIO V306 I III y.. -•H VV T ELEVATION 1/16' I I r 1 Vi,---I ' /; II j s: •- anac r I I,lil,;ll i '' II e. s .-a--...v.... 1 I II J l\ L. I 1 r jl -_--__ I \ _ .l_ 1^' 11-IJ_ _ '___--__ II - NTW tOY\!\'.t0 SW.731STREFF r LOTS 3,4T IL ria. 60%OfFiCE, 40% WAREHOUSE j A[(__I ( I'j vGRO l WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER KALE, '1'5041 A CHIT,E -S - RENTON, WASHINGTON HOLVICKdeREGT I'WERING•DEVELOPERS I r' • ,8510.00 5/27/8.i i REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIV .,.ON : / ,1/ Y LE '&(_ôf,%_ t l n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS fl NOT APPROVED 9 w LLB z/z.f Z s= „1,..,452,„..ttAt 4e- /4-4-;,( - --1 ‘;et=e4,z,t,:-,z7°C--t- Pal # • f /44 4 ocs J S r vle, .Q(It„ a',' ii p V' i/ l" 6 ,7 t yyL! 3 twnn 0 c). Si s- s P / s , me/m Warn-t ity DATE : C/z/e'S— SIGNATURE 0'= DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 c..)a-4-a att-,' fr) elt tirv -I-J /60- 4 e 'l aA'; 6-.4-.70--C.<4 - Gv c Ge--17c44€1:_<14 f ( ea tv' ''.-4 74171 --,ta-r‘h,•4-94 74 a-12 fireLe: AzO etye, //_ /_ ,I 4- 7AerA-4. 9 (4 n..„ 1_ 6). (pg) f. 111 ,4 Pet,:!: /4//)44-+,e,,j60*.ir',-, co e:--i,s_U,-,-,-....'4 i),14:?-` - If TAKT eAl , /aex,1-1,1e 1r t 2'7/itz4 1/ DATE : ( 1/A*5-- SIGNATURE 0= DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : c--D I ( APPROVED I ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS R1NOT APPROVED 6!z/te___OAT-e, 17-0 5t-- ‘=(.1 -A4s, -/_VIdd) 0 rle-tvCl?-el'(2 Gittack., T4=-. DATE : e (- CP',P-5--- SIGNAT F DIRECTOR OR AUTH RIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVTcTON C n APPROVED F/71Hr PROVED WITH CONDITIONS l INOT APPROVED r ctt 4;( 7 • L (7 DATE ; SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; f pi E APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS pi APPROVED 1.7 law 39 o- .- -Q DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING D=PARTMENT/DIVISION ; IL/Tt/ rENG/N.' e/A!G ri APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 134 NOT APPROVED lain APPROVAL SUIlEI T TO I 0600S w4L l(4•A! 1TE COMERS AUEEMEN' WATER Na 3TE COMERS A6REEMER' • SEMEN NO STEM DEVELOPMENT CURIE - RATER yg,S , Q, Q. 'ri)( 2 f' 3 5 L4 MEM `DELOPMENT CNARCE • SEWER ECIAI EiSiSSNEHT AR,) ix.MGE • WATER IAlp PECIAI ASSFSSkEN1 AItA CHARGE 'EWER NO MVP WATER FLAN YES PROVED SEWER PUN YeS tO /1 J 419at. PROVED FFRE NIIRAI' LOCATION II FIRE DEFT. LIE Fill ANAITSIS DATE : 6 13 ter REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVES n ROVED WITH CONDITIONS F-1NOT APPROVED 2Z% rtgaJ -lJI3 i TTc/ 3 /76 S'li/a-rc- 1 CeND(ic_r prop e.2 DATE : -7- g SIGNATURE Cp:/ IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : IrAPPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1-1 NOT APPROVED A . f DATE; 1/ ". e 3 G ATURE F SIR CT.`' OR AUTHORIZED REPRES -TIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :/ IEL APPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED Cl I DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTtR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 0762N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-066-85 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-044-85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL_ CENTER - Phase 3. Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of four, one-story tilt-up concrete and glass storefront buildings totalling 85,200 square feet for office and warehouse use on a 6.5 acre site. PROPONENT: Holvick, deRegt, Koering LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the east side of Powell Avenue S.W. at the 550-600 block. LEAD AC,ENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significar t adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Thera is no comment period for this DNS Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to King County Superior Court no later than July 22, 1985. You shot Id be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building dnd Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: July 3, 1985 PUBLICATION DATE: July 8, 1985 Imo_ Ronald G. Nelson La ,r . Sp ing r Building ,end Zoning Director Policy Develop nt Direc r i`j Richard (2. Houghton Public W Jrks Director 4111P 1823Z CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 6, 1985 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. KEMPER MULLINS Application to rezone approximately 3.67 acres of property from G-1 to B-1 for future commercial use, file R-026-85; located on the north side of N.E. Sunset Boulevard and approximately 116 feet east of Anacortes Avenue Northeast. HOI_VICK, deREGT, KOERING WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - Phase 3. Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of four, one-story tilt-up concrete and glass storefront buildings totalling 85,200 square feet for office and warehouse use on a 6.5 acre site, file SA-044-85; located on the east side of Powell Avenue S.W. at the 550-600 block. HO_VICK deREGT, KOERING WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - Phase 2B. Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a one, two-story tilt-up corcrete building and two, one-story tilt-up concrete buildings totalling 60,500 square feet for office and warehouse use, file SA-045-85; located on the south side of S.W. 7th Street at the 1100-1200 block. FIF:ST CITY EQUITIES VA_LEY 405 BUSINESS PARK - PHASE II. Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a three story office building having approximately 48,350 square feet ( a modification of site plan approval SA-053-84), file SA-047-85; located at the northwest corner of Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. 10th Street (if extended). 1835 BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 6, 1985 APPLICANT: HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING FILE NUMBER: SA-044-85 A.SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval to allow the construction of four one-story tilt-up concrete and glass storefront buildings totalling 85,200 square feet for office and warehouse use on a 6.5 acre site. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1.Owner of Record: Holvick, deRegt, Koering 2.Applicant: Holvick, deRegt,Koering 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached)1000 block of Powell Avenue S.W. 4.Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: M-P, Manufacturing Park; G-1, General Use. 6.Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option - Office 7. Size of Property: 6.5 acres 8.Access:Powell Avenue S.W. 9.Land Use: Undeveloped Property 10.Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Undeveloped Property East: Office: Warehouse South: Office; Warehouse West: Undeveloped Property C.HISTORY/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation 1745 April 4, 1959 Corrected 1764 May 19, 1959 Corrected 1928 Dec. 12, 1961 Rezone (G to M-P) R-328-79 3344 Aug. 17, 1979 Preliminary Plat PP-056-80 June 15, 1981 Final Plat FP-096-81 July 19, 1982 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1.Utilities: a. Water: A 12-inch water line is located along Powell Avenue S.W. near the subject site. b. Sewer: An 8-inch sanitary sewer line is located along Powell Avenue S.W. adjacent to the subject site. c. Storm Water Drainage: The subject site drains into Springbrook Creek Drainage System. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3.Transit: METRO Transit Route #912 operates along S.W. Grady Way approximately 2100 feet south of the subject site. PRELIMINARY REPORT -. _ IHE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING: SA-044-85 AUGUST 6, 1985 PAGE 2 4. chools: Elementary Schools: Middle Schools: c. High Schools: Not applicable. 5. Recreation: Not applicable. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. ection 4-730, Manufacturing Park (M-P). 2. Section 4-744(F)(2), Landscape Requirements for Green River Valley. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1.Green River Valley Plan, City of Renton, Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985. p. 31-50. 2. I dustrial Goals and Objectives, Policies Element, City of Renton,Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985, p. 18-19. G. DE?ARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1.The applicant, Holvick, deRegt, Koering (HDK), is requesting site plan approval to allow the construction of four one-story tilt-up concrete buildings totaling 85,200 square feet of office and warehouse on a 6.5 acre site. In addition, 278 parking spaces are proposed on the design plans. 2. The Environmental Review Committee has issued a declaration of non-significance concerning the proposed construction of the three office buildings. The appeal period expired on Monday, July 22, 1985. 3.In the review of the site plan, the staff and the Hearing Examiner should consider the following criteria: a, Compatibility with adjacent structures. b. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. c. Access. d' Functionality of a parking lot. eI Traffic circulation. f. Pedestrian circulation. This project will be the continuation of the basic style developed in the first three construction phases of Washington Technical Center by HDK. 4. The following is an analysis of design points of concern for the project: a. Pedestrian Circulation: The site plan does not show how it interties with the adjacent manufacturing park development. Functional relationships between the previous phases should include pedestrian corridors linking these buildings. The site plan does not suggest how this can be accomplished. b. Traffic Circulation: Three direct accesses are provided off of Powell Avenue S.W. The southern most access point is a shared driveway. c. Functionality of the Parking Lot: The parking lot is designed at maximum capacity; 278 parking spaces are required, 278 are provided. The site plan is not specific enough to totally evaluate whether all of the parking spaces comply with the City Code. This proposal does not allow for any conversion of warehouse space to office space. Circulation appears to be very good with the common easement along the southern property line. Based upon the parking requirements and design requirements, it appears that the buildings have been maximized for the subject site. The Fire Department has commented that they do not believe that the plans are adequate to review emergency access. PRELIMINARY REPORT 1 -HE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING: SA-044-85 AUGUST 6, 1985 PAGE 3 d. Access: As stated above, access is at three points off of Powell Avenue S.W. e. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code: The building plans as submitted comply with the requirements of the Zoning Code and the Parking and Loading Ordinance. The intent projected provides a manufacturing park atmosphere but does not really provide very much outside open space for people. These buildings, since they are being utilized by office and warehousing workers, will have a high demand upon both active and passive recreational areas. Washington Technical Center has not addressed the issues on on-site open space for people. f. Compatibility with Adjacent Structures: This project is a continuation of the existing development to the east and north and suggests a continuation of the basic theme for Washington Technical Center. Therefore, it can be determined to be compatible with the adjacent uses. 5. Various City departments have commented and, with the exception of the Fire Department and Utilities Engineering Division, have recommended approval of the project. The Fire Department's concerns rests primarily with the emergency access and circulation, and Utilities Engineering Division is concerned about water and sewer plans which will be a requirement of the building permit. H. DEDARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the site plan approval request. file SA-045-85, be continued until August 27, 1985, to allow the applicant to prepare specific plans to show the following: 1.Pedestrian circulation to intertie with the adjacent complex and future complexes. 2. A revised site plan showing specific parking layouts with individual stalls and the reduction of building space to show compliance with on-site circulation standards for emergency access. I 4ic ., KA y I;.i Is ' 1_-.'' , Ili 'OO ril 0 ii,II, 41 t.9 , t7-1Z 14744'. , 1 V o ` fir. i 1 , 1- • T , T. Ise%/ ;,1 LA Pt(4/. . 1 CL 4. i,.i I R-2 e10.-- . / 7" ,: . . iii; ,.it.,.. •—, :,,4,. b A ie 40„ j LI 1 .\•• •!!' ' c ter.. 1 I . c.. . .- I 1 e M4 I M E T R Z ; I T D 15 PO 5 AIL 1 d \, L o, R f - 4 l p ijto.D UI ' al II• I ri11 11 5 NKitk1• Q®II. I11 roll 1111111(; 'i. =alw. L-1 sp_' ..muul I." a l — III • u:,. ue - - a, :: 13 alI IIIi1! 'III 111111 , p.r-_ -aye I,II,]- 77,11..- rrt_i HOLVICK, deRegt, KOERING SA-044-85 APPL I CANT HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING TOTAL AREA ± 6.5 ACRES PR I NC I PAL ACCESS POWELL AVENUE S.W. EXISTING ZONING M-P, MANUFACTURING PARK EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY PROPOSED USE FOUR ONE STORY BUILDINGS CONSISTING OF 85,200 SQ. FT. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION - OFFICE COMMENTS q• V !_ ti''`_ 4 , ` C't4 n y o o I r. __ I•„ i---.ii141.1141 II 6°.°ct ...NtMiti\Ilk\.r._ i•CA VA.' ..-,''''. o`.: ` Zet..:-. .-..:. ','- i' 0:. ,.L2's d10011111I -\ 000 ° ° a Ib NOtiNi41 1 100co000.0000 -•i• Q hk. 0000000 0000 IN.O P• O MAW J 00000 0 0 o VO O• 1INNINION r,''' ." 4:....-...`'.... iii7:11i:... :: .i.i.i .;.i.:.: • — . 1,_, i? C9 fi\® 4pIA® niiiiii aim. f... . a"000r oUoV ' mom.team sumom00%mum roam ftspy,_ i isas.o 0 0 000W° I. I r u00.N[.n o°o°o°o°o° 000000000 a..! ° . , IPIk r000°000 . 000 i ,t !-- O• a wl. L__.— -- b000000000- IUVV UUU1,, oo• 000•]'•r•'•ti..Mar0..t ;tp llelL V\ 0000000°000 O000•1-• i " VO• i` 40 0000000000 °O 0000 1 • •00000• o•..u w ~N r <, 1 1 . . 0000000000 0 o :° lia% oo\ 9 , 7s•f.•N•IM j, I 1 b o 0000000000o r f O 00 ;.roo. •°000°°°• ,__-.e__.,ee. " ' 0000007 c_ o ° o• 000000 000.0 000, •00000 11:2:ii j 'i,i," ,, ,•N•N N.1 • o o r o 0 0 00000°0000G 00000• I 0•O, /;',7./ ONNU 0000J00000000E%f!%`o 0 0 Si1 Ni.' ..1.•: ooG 000• 00000• ,••••• 24:97.0 , .y ON_Na o o o o o, l. oo ° ° ° ° °• j', I `~ 000000000• 000000000° ostoofe Elo10WIIIIMIMP0000000000000000 O OO O O O:° ' ge c w:• OOO°oo°o°o°OrO` ,c•, .1.::;a 3 C..',,,,, , o 0 0 0 0 00If.\:: .N:.N. 1•t.'V •' fl5... 000000000o ! :::dI1IIN a I I I I I I I I I o 0 0OOO00000000,00.0• •a. .O•11' .. l:{,,•'ti•i'•. 11 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1;1 1 1 1 1 i..00000000000'000o I r. .swim r• a N.O.1 J.. i'.- ., °-., I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 i I` •.o..y• 00000°c o... A, p u- N''',.: ,'•,a•+`•. 1 1 1 I 11 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I.1 I I I I III Ps'siRir __ 11 1as11 0a••. N +....• r.rr I I I I I IIII I I I I I 11 1 1 1 1 1 olio,II t e.. a e I I I I I I III11 I' I I'I,I I I IA I I I f// I I, I I I i• ';;•<-,•••' :':::-..:::<;Jti lilllllllllllllllllllllllllll. lllllll Illlll,fil 1 Illllf III IIII'IIII'I •II,1 11111111, .N. M; fib' am.I I I I I I I I I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 ill 1 1 I I I I I I I ( I I I I I 1 1 I I 11'1 1 i. 317 L`;ti,.,h A I w 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I M I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I r' •:,', t•+%°li Y I!IIIIII'I111.1'1'I'I''IIIIII IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'III'lull't'1IIIIIII1III111111I'I'1111111111 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1•I I I, 7` ttt1 I I I I I I 0000• .1 1 1 1 iii t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I , 1 1 1 1 1 -in IIII 11I I I I I I IIII '00000' 1 1 1 I I I I I ,„„„„;,;,;,„„„„1,;„,;,;,,,,;,;,;,;,;„„„„,, s,® I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I N 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I :00000: '11111 4 IIIIII 111111111111111111I1111 I11111 11 Vim r3 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,•l i l l l l l iF 1ft. • :. . III I,I'II111 II ;III1111111111 'I11111111111111111111111111111111Illllll1 %IIII - Illllll1'I 'I,1,11,,1,•II III IIllllll 11111111I11111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIlIIIIII'1111 I III I11 II ! IIIIIIIIII11i111it111 IIIIII II111 •1 1 jT•1 '-i it. iii:::::i..:.:.://,,:„,,,:,,,,,,, •„,, - i ii:42:; III A. ''1! Iil 1 • 111111111 I IIIIIIIl111111111111111111111111111IIII,Il111,11111111111111I,111 1111I o ii 11111111111• 1 1 1, y. F JIIv. 1 IIII 1 111111111 1 11110 1I1 111 Illllll Illllll 1111111111111II1 111111I111I I1 1I 111, A i . ,A I1- 1I1 ' I 1 Il 1 I _ 1f +1111 d i 111 1I I I I I I I I I I I u.•s, N HSd I I I l 11111 I 11II E!: III < 1I II III ,,• I '1 I I I II I I II1 :,rr, ,e 111111111111 IIIII1 • c ; I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIIIII I I I c.o:,V }•'.'. 0•4.,;. I I 1 1 I I I I I I I . 1 1 I 1 I j I I I 11 ,{f ill IIII I; II r e;•• 7:-:'"- 111111 111111111 III t 1 11 .,1 1 IIIII • I • 1:.? y , 11111 I I - 1 I I I I li M• Mr• 1L M/ 1 1 1 1 I ja'-'- 1 1 I I lr 1"I 1 ii1 l I III .r 1 1 1IIII11 . ! I I I t l I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 • II111I III I I I I I I 11 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I'7000' X:=11111,111,1 IIII II -• Illllll "- • ... I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I ! 1 I 00o• 1„r-•0 I I I,I 1't;I 1 Io•i•• s...=..c_assasac-- semi I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I fbl 000 1 t I . I I I l l so sage•.. page.' P. I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 t 1 I I I I I ! 4 1 1 000. 4---41 4,•: 0 0• • uuv NNn tid 11111111111I1111111 it I 11111111111 I 31IllllllI1111 'o00 v. 00o c-cr;•• I I I I I I I I I I I I 0°00000 %s.Nn C l t l l t l l l I I!1 I I I I 1000IIIIIII , - •:'••• 0000 u Jy 4 gv-^ 11 I I -.c'.• I I 1 000,000,000.'• • i'.••. I..Ns.l• •••• N ;:. I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I o•I I I111',f 00000000,.••• •'°I"' r.ts NnsssNN1N 11IIII IIl l l lllIIIIIs1 I 11III'I I IIIII `i i .°=":4. II ! o; •,l: ` •0°0°000°0°0°000 • ,, N11:a.„. III I II I I IIII I'I'I'III I`11IIi 111l•IIIIII • '4. I I`4Itlo00000 • uNN N•N ,I I I 1111 ( I .. I'- ^" III Iti •'00000000000000000•v I Il l l ll l II `.•. • } I I III I I I1III`Itlllll I II1 ;13; I I 00000000000000000000• c I i , • , . 10000000000000°0°0°00 •• • 1 3 "j1.i-` i.• r. — . ..I I I I o00000000 e C` , 3, s1 I:O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • l ., i av, tT•D.:t%..1 d ifZJ'y'I I,I , SI o-o 0 0 0 0 0 0•. •t--- ., 'tc ,,'1.'" t{ +-d L:=,-- —l'= '- r:. r c`= I 1 I {A-t.•‘•°.?0000 ' •••• i S v [`V,`., ` ' i'-:-af..1 ' r•• _ i- t 1 I I t` off• • • •./.s. I I I 1 I I I tl I I I a 1i.-. i ?' 1 . u?'\. 1 1." • •• q • ••sue• • n I I I I I I'i I I I I I'1 I 1 t I.c- I I 1•It. • • • • • r 11 1 6 I I I I I Ilk r i t,'t•'•• I I I I I I a III 1 III 1111111 If; •^a 1• t;A- f•cC.' .i[ II111 IIIIII,III a Nii..-Ilijl'l1lili _t 111 7•a, ic r.1>,O1I III 1I1 1 1I 1 1•i• •li i \i•• III i i 0. I I II I I1'1I. S,-4• I 1819Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CRY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON AUGUST 6, 1985, AT 9:00 A.N. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: KI:MPER MULLINS Application to rezone approximately 3.67 acres of property from G-1 to B- 1 fgr future commercial use, file R-026-85; located on the north side of N.E. Sunset Boulevard and approximately 116 feet east of Anacortes Avenue Northeast. FIRST CITY EQUITIES VALLEY 405 BUSINESS PARK - PHASE II. Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a three story office building having approximately 48,350 square feet ( a modification of site plan approval SA-053-84), file SA-047-85; located at the northwest corner of Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. 10th Street (if extended). HCILVICK, deREGT, KOERING WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - Phase 3. Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of four, one--story tilt-up concrete and glass storefront buildings totalling 85,200 square feet for office and wa •ehouse use on a 6.5 acre site, file SA-044-85; located on the east side of Powell Avenue S.W. at the 550-600 block. HOLVICK deREGT, KOERING WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - Phase 2B. Application for site plait approval to allow the construction of a one, two-story tilt-up concrete building and two, one-story tilt-up concrete buildings totalling 60,300 square feot for office and warehouse use, file SA-045-85; located on t:he south side of S.W. 7th Street at the 1100-1200 block. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 6, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : JULY 26, 1985 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JERRY F. LIND, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: !subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Pubic, in and for the State of Washington residing in L(V TO ti on the 26th day of July. 1985. J/ r61Z-7_,2 ) vc'%CQ SIGNED'lJQJ..ti( . of R4, 0 ) City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON AUGU,T 6 1985 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONC RNING: SA-044-85 REZO E From To . SPEC AL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To x SITE irPROVAL SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lots PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM ._ Li GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 550-600 BLOCK, LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION 0 SIGNIFICANT NINON—SIGNIFICANT iiiFORFURTHERINFORMATIONCALLTHECITYOFRENTON BUILDING &ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHI PROPER AUTHORIZATION OF I t$ BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 mom, MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 0, 9cD SE PT- P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAY'JR July 24, 1985 Mr. Lore-) Davis Holvick, deRegt, Koering 1000 S.1h. 7th Street Renton, AlA 98055 Re: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - Phase 3. Application for site plan approval tc allow the construction of four, one--story tilt-up concrete and glass storefront buildings totalling 85,200 square feet for office and warehouse use on a 6.5 acre si.e, file SA-044-85; located on the east side of Powell Avenue S.W. at the 550-600 block. Dear Mr. Davis: The Cit::, of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentionEd application on June 4, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for August 6, 1985. The public hearing commenc es at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The appl cant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any quest ions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning A iministrator RJB:JMM:cl 1824Z 13°•'0414'85 CITY C' rsi:i®ON HOLVICK deREGT KOERING 1-19111/19tF: JUL 8 1985 June 24, 1985 Mr. Roger Blaylock Zoning Administrator CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER/VALLEY 405 BUSINESS PARK TRIP GENERATION Dear Roger: Holvick deRegt Koering and First City Equities have met to discuss the concerns of the City of Renton in regards to the trip generation from Washington Technical Center/Valley 405 Business Park. In order to provide the City of Renton specific perimeters as to the trip generation associated with each of the individual properties, we present the follow- ing prorata division of trip generations. Total Daily Trip Generation Earlington Park Environmental Impact Statement 19,825 Daily Trips of Daily Trip Area Development Allocation Holvick deRegt Koering Total Developable Area 26.2 acres 32% 6,389 First City Equities Total Developable Area 55.1 acres 68% 13,436 81.3 acres 100% 19,825 The proration of the trip generation for each of the individual properties is based on the final traffic study projections in the final Environmental Impact Statement of Earlington Park. Holvick deRegt Koering and First City Equities are providing the City of Renton with the preceeding daily trip allocation so that the City of Renton Planning Department will be able to assess impacts and mitigating measures based on the individual properties. Holvick deRegt Koering 725 POWELL AVENUE,S.W.,SUITE A • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • (206)226-1222 Mr. Roger Blaylock June 24, 1985 Page Two and First City Equities have agreed to this proration and our signature below provides the City of Renton with our agreement as to the proration of daily trips from the site. We hope that this allocation of daily trips allows the City of Renton with the ability to assess each individual property as they are developed. Very truly yours, HOLVICK deREGT KOERING Loren Davis LD/gb CC: Greg Byler/FCE City of Renton Corres FCE File ABOVE MENTIONED PRORATION AGREED TO: t/ -e-5- HOL ICK deREGT KOERING Date liK 4-(41____- ,;ze.A_____-- i7 /7n FIRSY EQUITIES Date CITY CA: RENTON I N n D J1- JUL 8 1985 HOLVICK deREGT KOERING E?UILD N(',/ZO!NINL LJEPT. June 24, 1985 Mr. Roger Blaylock Zoning Administrator CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER/VALLEY 405 BUSINESS PARK TRIP GENERATION Dear Roger: Holvick deRegt Koering and First City Equities have met to discuss the concerns of the City of Renton in regards to the trip generation from Washington Technical Center/Valley 405 Business Park. In order to provide the City of Renton specific perimeters as to the trip generation associated with each of the individual properties, we present the follow- ing prorata division of trip generations. Total Daily Trip Generation Earlington Park Environmental Impact Statement 19,825 Daily Trips of Daily Trip Area Development Allocation Holvick deRegt Koering Total Developable Area 26.2 acres 32% 6,389 First City Equities Total Developable Area 55.1 acres 68% 13,436 81.3 acres 100% 19,825 The proration of the trip generation for each of the individual properties is based on the final traffic study projections in the final Environmental Impact Statement of Earlington Park. Holvick deRegt Koering and First City Equities are providing the City of Renton with the preceeding daily trip allocation so that the City of Renton Planning Department will be able to assess impacts and mitigating measures based on the individual properties. Holvick deRegt Koering 725 POWELL AVENUE,S.W,SUITE A • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • (206)226-1222 Mr. Roger Blaylock June 24, 1985 Page Two and First City Equities have agreed to this proration and our signature below provides the City of Renton with our agreement as to the proration of daily trips from the site. We hope that this allocation of daily trips allows the City of Renton with the ability to assess each individual property as they are developed. Very truly yours, HOLVICK deREGT KOERING Loren Davis LD/gb CC: Greg Byler/FCE City of Renton Corres FCE File ABOVE MENTIONED PRORATION AGREED TO: 7"— ( //HOLVICK deREGT KOERING Date FIRST CITY EQUITIES Date CITY RO,;'470N LD)HOLVICK deREGT KOERING JUL 81985 July 1, 1985 pDUiLD NG/ZOMNG DEPT. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: PROPOSED TRAFFIC STUDY WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER/VALLEY 405 BUSINESS PARK Gentlemen: Holvick deRegt Koering is requesting that the Environmental Review Committee reconsider the requirement of an updated traffic study for the portion of the property in the Washington Technical Center plat owned by Holvick deRegt Koering. I have met with Mr. Blaylock twice to discuss this matter. Holvick deRegt Koering does not intend to exceed their prorata share of the daily trips generated from the Washington Technical Center plat as defined in the Environmental Impact Statement. In order to allow the Environmental Review Committee to assess Holvick deRegt Koering's development plans for its portion of the Washington Technical Center plat, I am submitting the following information. Exhibit 1. Revised site plan with P-1 Channel Earlington Park, Page IXoftheFinalEnvironmentalImpactStatementdatedFebruary1981. Pages 15 and 16 of Appendix C of the Earlington Park Final Environmental Impact Statement dated February 1981. Exhibit 2. Holvick deRegt Koering site plan depicting existing and proposed development of Holvick deRegt Koering's portion of the Wash- ington Technical Center plat. Exhibit 3. Prorata share calculation of daily trip generation associated with Holvick deRegt Koering's portion of Washington Technical Center. Exhibit 4. Holvick deRegt Koering's proposed daily trip generation calcu-lation based on actual buildings built, proposed buildings submitted to the City of Renton for site plan review and anticipated development of Lots not yet submitted to the City of Renton for site plan review. Average case and worst case calculations. Exhibit 5. Signed letter of agreement between First City Equities and Holvick deRegt Koering agreeing to prorata share of the daily tripsgeneratedfromthesite. 725 POWELL AVENUE,S.W,SUITE A • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • (206)226-1222 Environmental RL..-Jw Committee July 1, 1985 Page Two The following documentation has been submitted to the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee to help facilitate their review of Holvick deRegt Koering's request to waive the requirement of the additional traffic study for the portion of property controlled by Holvick deRegt Koering in the Washington Technical Center plat. Holvick deRegt Koering has been aware of the constraints of the daily trip generation from the Washington Technical Center plat as defined in the final Environmental Impact Statement. Holvick deRegt Koering has, at several meetings with Mr. Blaylock, indicated that they do not intend to exceed their allocated prorata share of daily trips as defined in the Final Environ- mental Impact Statement. Mr. Blaylock has indicated his concern about the additional traffic that may be generated from the site if the buildings are 100% office and has been monitoring the potential daily trips from the site based on site plans approved to date. Mr. Blaylock has been concerned that the 6600 trips associated with Phase I will be used up before the land area defined as Phase I on the revised site plan of the Final E.I.S. is actually built out. It has been my contention with Mr. Blaylock that the revised site plan of the Final E.I.S. is a preliminary site plan and that the trip generation of Phase I should be associated with daily trips generated, not the land area. Once the 6600 trips have been used up in Phase I, then the City of Renton could require the developer to update the City with their proposed build-out of the site versus the daily trips defined in the Final Environmental Impact Statement. Holvick deRegt Koering has worked with the City of Renton and with Mr. Blaylock in particular, at great length to answer his concerns about the daily trips generated from the site at the present and in the future. Mr. Blaylock met with Barb Moss of First City Equities and myself recently to discuss the daily trip generation totals to date. Last week I submitted to Mr. Blaylock a calculation of the potential daily trips based on existing buildings built and buildings submitted to the City of Renton for site plan approval at this time (See Exhibit 6) . Based on those calculations, the 6600 trips associated with Phase I of the development would not be exceeded. Due to the dedication of the 17 acres of Tract A for the retention pond for the P-1 Channel, the amount of trips associated with the remaining developable portion of the land has increased. I have discussed this issue with Mr. Blaylock several times, but have not seen Mr. Blaylock take into consideration this transfer of trips from the retention pond site to other areas of the site. The retention pond site was originally defined as the office park portion of the site, but due to the dedication of 17 acres of that tract, office buildings have been developed more fully in the portion of the site along Powell Avenue. This elimination of 17 acres of the site allows for a higher density of office park to be developed in other areas of the site based on the total Daily Trip Generations defined in the Final Environmental Impact Statement. In addition, the heavy warehousing that was indicated on the revised site plan of the Final L.I.S. assumed that the site coverage for heavy warehousing would be 50% of the site. Environmental Review Committee July 1, 1985 Page Three Holvick deRegt Koering's development to date and site plans submitted for approval assume approximately 30% of the lot area covered with building for the business park portion of the site and 35% of the lot area covered with building for the office park portion of the site. These reduced building coverage areas also allows for a heavier concentration of office development than was originally proposed in the revised site plan of the Final Environmental Impact Statement. Holvick deRegt Koering understands the concerns of the City of Renton regarding the daily trip generation of the Washington Technical Center plat. Holvick deRegt Koering feels that the documentation submitted with this letter indicates that Holvick deRegt Koering has not exceeded the original daily trip generation associated with its portion of the Washington Technical Center plat. Based on the submitted documentation, Holvick deRegt Koering requests that the City of Renton proceed with processing the site plan submitted for Lots #3, 4, and 7 of the Washington Technical Center plat. I look forward to hearing from the City of Renton as to the acceptability of those site plans and the documentation submitted here. If you have any questions or need further explanation, I look forward to discussing this with you at your convenience. Very truly yours, HOLVCK deREGT KOERING Loren Davis LD/gb Enc. CC: City of Renton Corres. Larry Springer Ron Nelson Dick Houghton a. R? E%, iP Forts' — Gam- TO ! E- P,^ d T R A C T A 1 , a 1 1 5 nPRASE 1 - 1.... tx ,, , _ J--• : i.,, / - \> j n V \ t i sH OP ise - 6-`' -- _:,._____ t___..—• l _ PHASF 2 l k• TRAVT tb I E+ 1 wp. VY Ha an+ v rIca9: 64C, I fFaRr D F L HJv! > LEtiu. r. tt D r r • 7- E 2 . m 0t, M o 33 013• o Q o0 R; c+ w+ aL.. F f. Wa 0 2 "" ES D I• I i Ec1._-_.• D m SITE PLAN C z V r1 3 ill W I s fJrL. O. 1G Mp. r. E II pol. 011i1. 4vY F t 4, 40• 4 K.- b ttE9Fi13-, P: rpN P 1: 0, 1. 41. 4..[ Y P.M. Peak Hour Daily Trip Generation Rates Trip Generation Rates Land Use Trips Per 1 ,000 Square Ft) Trips Per 1 ,000 Square Ft) Range Applied Range Applied Heavy Warehousing 4 - 6 5 6 - 1 .2 9 Light Warehousing 4 - 8.7 6 7 - 1 .3 9 Business Park 8 - 12.5 10 1 .0 - 1 .5 1 .3 Office Park 15 - 25 21 2.2 - 2.5 2.4 These ranges reflect the various types of business that occupy a given land use type. Not knowing the exact character of the businesses that will occupy this development, an average or slightly above average trip generation rate was selected by combining these nationally observed rates with observations at local developments of similar character. When these rates are applied to the phased development profile shown on Figure 1 , the daily and peak hour trips shown on Table 2 result. This shows that at full development the proposal will generate about 19,825 one-way trips per day (9,915 round trips) and about 2,650 one-way trips during the evening peak hour (the majority of trips - approximately 70% - 1 will be traveling away from the industrial park). About one-third of the total daily and about 40 percent PM peak hour trips will be generated during Phase I of the development. Difference in trip generation in Pha- ses I and II is due to the relatively large portion of office development typically a high traffic generator per unit floor area) . These figures reflect conditions on weekdays and reflect all vehicle trips including those made by employees, service and support services and truck pick-up and delivery. Except for isolated studies which are site or industry specific, there are no universally accepted standards for estimating the amount of weekend vehicle activity at a complex like Earlington Park. These studies suggest, however, that the weekend day traffic volume is less than 10 percent of the average weekday volume. Most weekend traffic at this development is likely to be associated with the office and business park. Weekend truck activity should be very limited (less than 5 percent of the average weekday truck volumes) because the overtime labor costs associated with driver and warehouse- men make normal truck transfer operations uneconomic. Thus any weekend 15- f TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION Daily and PM Peak Hour Phase Heavy i_arrhousing light 4ta; :lusino Business Park Office Park TotalDailyPMPeakHourDailyPMPeakHourDailyPMPeakHourDailyPMPeakHourDaily PM Peak HourI20603702265340233530500II1615325p66601015 0 1050 I35 I0, I3 165TOTAL38756952265 300 1175 1635 340 3385 . 440 10,300 1175 19,825 2650 t IK I I d , f+ v Na t NU ,1. i EXHIBIT #2 i r 9 1# Cl F 14' ,31µi,-,; Lot 3 & 4 tr 82,000 S.F. Business lark 1; '4 a ' 50 to ?5 Office l I I,•, t1 ,! t t, .' fU 1 Mt MI l oPhtt N I R ,i I Lots 5 & 6 1. ,•, 1 54,000 S.F. it 9.4 ACRES t, ',A. 1 " 100% Office I f i t,., ' ' .. , %, 'iNg:' 3.6ACRES S.W. SEVENTH ST.Lot 1 - 38,000 S.F. Business Park I II / l"t I't IASt IA I,,,t t,;l•:. ,11 1 ice N, r r' r It(III1HNl. t IUtl•. l,l • Il'1• f t14ytr, I1,1,,, 11 ty ` N,11 \\\II:\lilt, al k;•,• 41, S I I'IIASI 18 I,,,I ,; Illir:. in i<•l't',:;1 k Rol I IINI, 12 4.0 ACRES 1 f ! r. 'II1,11 III:\',II4 j 111 Q III111IDINl. I I' w IIIASIIII I ' IIj ' 01/4 RI III I/IN/, 1.1 pp til fp. e O V;II!\I I P,'ri!til ‘‘Ali Am I, h.. 6pb I 3,, pip! I'I IASI ?A I,,,I •/ I UI I'.. III 1 1 t•t. 1' E 'I' iF'iI h9+# , faili III IIII,INt, II, mod. _ Olt1 ,8 u I•,I,`,I ei ,1 r, F 1. IIR`,I iM N¢ i'1I,IK1, .r, II,,. W, TON 0 7:: "4 ' 1 I 1 1 I BUII nINI, 18 1 S' 1'IdUI 1 i ,it L, t, t tF 4 lillll UING I)11111 YtU) l nit 3 4 II.\• 1 MnR1IM,,IKl1 IIU\ j IUKWII. f IrrilliP I i . 11 tt, VIlIN11 Y MAP4 44', 4 c;.; I-- WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER RENTON, WASI IINC TON ,N 10i11OLVICKdeREGTKOEZING • IJEVELOPLRS MASTLE< PLAN An1011" tt-3 EARLINGTON PARE. TRIP GENERATIC" VERSUS WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER PkwiwwED TRIP GENERATION EARLINGTON PARE: FINAL E.I.S. DAILY TkIP GENERATION 19825 DAILY TRIPS TOTAL E.I.S. AREA 109.30 ACRES LESS P-1 ChANNEL AREA 17.00 ACRES LESS ROADS 11.00 TOTAL DEVELOABLE AREA 81.30 X OF OF AREA TRIPS F.C.E. AREA 55.10 0.68 13436 WA. TECH. CENTER AREA 26.20 0.32 6389 TOTAL 81.30 1.00 19825 EARLINGTON PARK TRIP GENERATIC EXHIBIT VERSUS WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER PkurusED TRIP GENERATION EARLINGTON PARK FINAL E.I.S. DAILY TRIP GENERATION 19825 DAILY TRIPS TOTAL E.I.S. AREA 109.30 ACRES LESS P-1 CHANNEL AREA 17.00 ACRES LESS ROADS 11.00 TOTAL DEVELOABLE AREA 81,30 WA. TECH CENTER PLAT AREAS ACRES OF OF REA TRIPS F.C.E. AREA 55.10 0.68 13436 N.U.A. AREA 26.20 0.32 63839 TOTAL 81.30 1.00 19825 AVERAGE CASE LOTS 1,3,4 @ 30% COVERAGE 50% OFFICE 50% WAREHOUSE LOT 2 16600 BUS. PARK LOTS 5 L 6 35% COVERAGE 100% OFFICE LOT 7 35% COVERAGE 100% OFFICE LOT 8 34000 SF OFFICE LOT 9 66400 SF OFFICE LOT I BLDG. AREA DAILY TRIPS TOTAL DAILY OFFICE WAREHOUSE OFFICE WAREHOUSE TRIPS 21/1000 6/1000 t1 19000 19000 399 114 513 PRPOSED 12 11000 5000 231 30 261 BUILT t3 & 14 41000 41000 861 246 1107 SUBMITTED t5 & t6 54000 1134 1134 PRPOSED 17 60000 1260 1260 SUBMITTED t8 34000 714 714 BUILT 19 66400 1394 1394 BUILT 285400 65000 5993 390 - JO>6383 WORST CASE LOTS 1,3,4 P 30'L COVERAGE 75% OFFICE 25% WAREHOUSE LOT 2 16600 BUS. PARK LOTS 5 & 6 35% COVERAGE 100% OFFICE LOT 7 35% COVERAGE 100% OFFICE LOT 8 34000 SF OFFICE LOT 9 66400 SF OFFICE LOT t BLDG. AREA DAILY TRIPS TOTAL DAILY OFFICE WAREHOUSE OFFICE WAREHOUSE TRIPS 21/1000 6/1000 t1 26000 10000 588 60 648 PRPOSED 12 11000 5000 231 30 261 BUILT 13 & t4 61000 21000 1281 126 1407 SUBMITTED t5 & 16 54000 1134 1134 PRPOSED t7 60000 1260 1260 SUBMITTED t8 34000 714 714 BUILT 19 66400 1394 1394 BUILT 314i00 3600 6602 216 --ilk818 HOLVICK deREGT KOERING June 24, 1985 Mr. Roger Blaylock Zoning Administrator CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER/VALLEY 405 BUSINESS PARK TRIP GENERATION Dear Roger: Holvick deRegt Koering and First City Equities have met to discuss the concerns of the City of Renton in regards to the trip generation from Washington Technical Center/Valley 405 Business Park. In order to provide the City of Renton specific perimeters as to the trip generation associated with each of the individual properties, we present the follow- ing prorata division of trip generations. Total Daily Trip Generation Earlington Park Environmental Impact Statement 19,825 Daily Trips of Daily Trip Area Development Allocation Holvick deRegt Koering Total Developable Area 26.2 acres 32% 6,389 First City Equities Total Developable Area 55.1 acres 68% 13,436 81.3 acres 100% 19,825 The proration of the trip generation for each of the individual properties is based on the final traffic study projections in the final Environmental Impact Statement of Earlington Park. Holvick deRegt Koering and First City Equities are providing the City of Renton with the preceeding daily trip allocation so that the City of Renton Planning Department will be able to assess impacts and mitigating measures based on the individual properties . Holvick deRegt Koering 725 POWELL AVENUE,S.W,SUITE A • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • (206)226-1222 Mr. Roger Blaylock June 24, 1985 Page Two and First City Equities have agreed to this proration and our signature below provides the City of Renton with our agreement as to the proration of daily trips from the site. We hope that this allocation of daily trips allows the City of Renton with the ability to assess each individual property as they are developed. Very truly yours, HOLVICK deREGT KOERING Loren Davis LD/gb CC: Greg Byler/FCE City of Renton Corres FCE File ABOVE MENTIONED PRORATION AGREED TO: HO ' ICK deREGT KOERING Date 7 /, FIRS ' CITY EQUITIES Date nn ninuiun iunnlLnL LCNItK/ VkLLLI 9V5 VU1Nt5h MO. L.nnilltr tt0 DAILY TRIP GENER TION ACTUAL & SUBMITTED FOR STIE P IEVIEW LOT 1 BLDG. AREA DAILY TRIPS TOTAL DAILY OFFICE BUS. PARK WAREHOUSE OFFICE BUS. PARK WAREHOUSE TRIPS 21/1000 10/1000 6/1000 H.I.K. LAND 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 16600 0 166 0 166 (BUILT) 13 & 14 85200 0 852 0 852 (SUBMITTED) 15 & #6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 60000 1260 0 0 1260 (SUBMITTED) 18 34000 714 0 0 714 (BUILT) 19 66400 1394 0 0 1394 (BUILT) TOTAL HDK 160400 101800 0 3368 1018 0 4386 TO DATE F.C.E. LAND FCE TO DATE 25400 20000 533 0 120 653 (BUILT) FCE PHASE 2 48000 1008 0 0 1008 (SUBMITTED NCLUDES 32000 S.I TOTAL FCE 73400 0 20000 1541 0 120 1661 APPROVED IN ORIGINAL SUBMI TO DATE TOTAL HDK + FCE TO DATE 176048 FIRST CITY July 8, 1985 EQUITIES CITY Cr cs7 -y0N1 11:ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE D ` ' ,a 10CityofRentonJUL. 8 1985MunicipalBuilding 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Re: Phase I Parking Reconfiguration Phase II Site Plan Review General Development VALLEY 405 BUSINESS PARK Genitemen: Phase I - Parking Reconfiguration First City Equities is requesting the Environmental Review Committee review the enclosed proposed drawing delineating an additional 114 parking spaces behind our existing Phase I office/warehouse building. As I discussed with Ron Nelson on Friday, July 5, First City Equities is in a position to accommodate a potential Boeing lease of 100% office use for our existing building. In order to transform the office/warehouse building into pure office, it is necessary to provide an additional 114 parking spaces. In order to this, we have extended the parking lot onto Tract B directly behind the existing building. Conditions of development for the Valley 405 Business Park include building Oakesdale from 7th to Grady Way concurrent with development of Tract B. First City Equities is requesting the Environmental Review Committee work with us to accommodate the market place by parking on Tract B for Phase I only without triggering the condition of construction of Oakesdale Avenue. I am working diligently with Metro, Container Corporation, Burlington Northern, and the City of Renton Public Works Department in order to finalize details of an L.I.D. formation to construct Oakesdale from Monstor Road to Grady Way. Finalization of the L.I.D. and formal petition signing should occur this month. By allowing us to provide parking for Boeing on our existing building in Phase I, the City of Renton is working with us in a logical rational program of development which best meets the needs of the community. I have reviewed the traffic impact as a result of our use of 100% office in Phase I. The attached chart represents the current Washington Technical Center (HDK) and First City Equities' existing and proposed use of their land. Please note that in identifying Phases I and II of First City Equities' properties to be office use entirely, the daily trips generated when added to the total 800 Fifth Avenue•Suite 4040 Seattle,Washington 98104•(206)624-9223 Real Estate Development and Investments rKt July 8, 1985 Page Two HDK's generated trips, amount to 6,352 total daily trips. Trip generation as identified in the original EIS for this project specified 6,660 daily trips as the threshold for the first phase of development. Since we are under this threshold even with the additional parking requirement, we feel that this is a logical solution to accommodate a potential Boeing lease. Our hope is that Boeing will find our project desirable enough to not only lease Phase I buildings but to continue in the future to absorb the leaseable space as it is developed. Phase II - Site Plan Review The Environmental Review Committee has requested First City Equities provide an updated traffic analysis to consider traffic impacts for HDK's and First City Equities' properties. As a result, the site plan review for our Phase II property has been stopped pending receipt of the analysis. We expect to have completed our traffic analysis for the entire plat next week. At that time I will see to it that the Environmental Review Committee receives a copy of the report for their review. However, given the enclosed analysis of trip generations as currently built and proposed by HDK and FCE, it is clear that all current proposals being reviewed by the City of Renton to date, are within the original final EIS projections for first phase of development. I therefore can see no logical reason for requiring an updated traffic analysis as input for our pending site plan review. I therefore request that the Environmental Review Committee proceed with review of our Phase II development and issue a declaration this week. Of concern to the ERC besides the traffic counts, is also the removal of 10th Street and its impact on fire access. My architect, Royce Berg of LPN, will be contacting Jim Matthews, the Fire Marshall, to discuss fire protection and to work out adequate access to serve the development without 10th Street. We feel confident a workable solution is attainable. General Development - Certificate of Occupancy A third item I would like to bring to the attention of the Environmental Review Committee at this time is that of the general development process for Valley 405 Business Park. The committee has already acknowledged its approval of First City Equities pulling building permits during the L.I.D. process on Oakesdale Avenue. However there was some concern as to our ability to follow through with a certificate of occupancy once the buildings were complete. Assuming the L.I.D. process is ongoing for Oakesdale, First City Equities proposes to develop buildings in a logical fashion. Obviously, if Oakesdale is the necessary access in order to reach a given building, and if it is not yet accessable, there would be no reason to request a certificate of occupancy. However, if First City Equities has constructed a building abutting S.W. 7th Street with full access provided to that building and adequate fire protection as well as adequate traffic flow, it seems reasonable to expect a certificate of occupancy to be issued on that building. Again, logic and reason would prevail in determing which building would receive a certificate of occupancy and which building would not receive a certificate of occupancy, tied to completion of Oakesdale Avenue. I understand the committee will be reviewing and commenting on these requests on Wednesday of this week. I am available to meet with you at that time or at your convenience should other concerns be raised. Please feel free to contact me at my office, if I can assist in this decision. ERC July 8, 1985 Page Three Very truly yours, FIRST CITY EQUITIES Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning BEM/dlp cc: Ron Nelson Dick Houghton Larry Springer Loren Davis Ed Armstrong Royce Berg Greg Byler Elliott Severson WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER/VALLEY 405 BUSINESS PARK Daily Trip Generation Actual & Submitted for Site Plan Review Lot # Bldg. Area Daily Trips Office - Bus Park Warehouse Office Bus Park Warehouse Trips 21/1000 10/1000 6/1000 H.D.K. Land 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 16600 0 166 0 166 (Built) 441 & #4 85200 0 852 0 852 (Submitted) 5 & #6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 60000 1260 0 0 1260 (Submitted) 8 34000 714 0 0 714 (Built) 9 66400 1394 0 0 1394 (Built) Total HDK 160400 101800 0 3368 1018 0 4386 To Date FCE - Land ase I 45600 0 0 958 0 0 958 (Built) Phase II 48000 0 0 1008 0 0 1008 (Replaces the 32,000 approved building for Phase 2.) TOTAL 93,600 0 1,966 0 0 1,966 TOTAL HDK & FCE TO DATE 6,352 r RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEP4 'MEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 066 - 85 APPLICATION ND(S) ; SA-044-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT ; FOLVICK, DeREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE :WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR, ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONCRETE AND GLASS STOREFRONT BUILDINGS TOTALING 85,200 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USE ON A 6. 5 ACRE SITE. LOCATION ; LCCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 550-600 BLOCK. TO : n PUBLIC W:)RKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/12/85 n ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTI ._ITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY D_VELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ri OTHERS ;_ COMMENTS OR SJGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . DN JUNE 11, 1985 REVIEWING DEPRTMENT/DIVISION ; /)/_/gy {/ (/tZOPmeWr- n APPROVED R APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS fl NOT APPROVED eg,tit-a6L-,- , ate efi-t-oig.A rh; e-0-7-70-rx--4 6./.4i-e,44„6 0:47 674e,.4. -e p. qe) 6 alel jr—:----;4,4ru lc DATE : q*-5-- SIGNATURE OF :DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT- BUILDING & ZONING DEP4 MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 066 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-044-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT ; HOLVICK, DeREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE ;WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR, ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONCRETE AND GLASS STOREFRONT BUILDINGS TOTALING 85,200 SQUARE _FEET FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USE ON A 6.5 ACRE SITE. LOCATION ; LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 550-600 BLOCK. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/12/85 El ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Ei POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON JUNE 11, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : El APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Nt NOT APPROVED o sz GCl 7i YefCP Orle-tv02- 2 G /..VArK, 4 DATE : SIGNAT iF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEN MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 066 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-044-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : HOLVICK, DeREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE :WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR, ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONCRETE AND GLASS STOREFRONT BUILDINGS TOTALING 85,200 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USE ON A 6. 5 ACRE SITE. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 550-600 BLOCK. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/12/85 ENGINEERING DIVISION l ( TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I ! PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT i ( BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT l ( POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT l ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON JUNE 11, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; n APPROVED 171 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ] NOT APPROVED Nee d L 5- 7> IT DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT""' BUILDING & ZONING DEN MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 066 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) ; SA-044-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : HOLVICK, DeREGT, KOERING PROJECT TIT'E ;WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR, ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONCRETE AND GLASS STOREFRONT BUILDINGS TOTALING 85,2OO SQUARE= FEET FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USE ON A 6. 5 ACRE SITE. LOCATION ; LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 550-600 BLOCK. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/12/85 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I ( PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDINS & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT l 1 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 ; 00 P .M. ON JUNE 11, 1985 REVIEWING DEFARTMENT/DIVISION ; n APPROVEC 17 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED 2 e 3 y 5zie)„,L___zr, 7 ems DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPT MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 066 - 85 APPLICATION NOBS) : SA-044-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : HOLVICK, DeREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE :WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR, ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONCRETE AND GLASS STOREFRONT BUILDINGS TOTALING 85,290 SOUAR_ FEET FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USE ON A 6. 5 ACRE SITE. LOCATION ; LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 550-600 BLOCK. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/12/85 El ENGINEERING DIVISION ITFAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : l l UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION ri FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS 8 RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY 0 FENTON D 69. T BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT JUN 0 lyd5 n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GUiLG+ivui.-wING DEPT. l l OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON JUNE 11, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1.471-/Ty .ENG/NEw-leyv I ( APPROVED Ei APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS GO NOT APPROVED erG S war I I RIME( APPROVAL MEC1 TI LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - WATER LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEVER rFg SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CURE • WATER yrEs N. l0f/P.jxx 2 ,3/ SYSTEM 9EvElOPMENT CNARI;E SEWER Y,ss i/ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA a:M`MCE . WATER No ZZi i3e7 3717 SPECIAL ASSESSPENT AREA CHARGE • ;'EWER APPROVEP PLATEN FiAN yES APPROVED SEWER PLAN lti5wia APPROVED TIRE NY1RA11T LOCATIONS II FIRE DEPT. FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS 41) clak- DATE : CO 7:1- SIGNATURE 0 DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEN MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 066 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-044-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : HOLVICK, DeREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE :WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR, ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONCRETE AND GLASS STOREFRONT BUILDINGS TOTALING 85,200 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USE ON A 6. 5 ACRE SITE. LOCATION ; LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 550-600 BLOCK. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/12/85 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : l l U1ILITIES ENG , DIVISION l JFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I ( PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT I ( BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT l ! POLICE DEPARTMENT I ( POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT l ( OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M , ON JUNE 11, 1985 REVIEWING DEFARTMENT/DIVISION ; I IAPPROVEE I ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED v o I- /4 i ?-6 Cc)`Vbeicx j j•Io z yz DATE : 6 -7- gS SIGNATURE 0 IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1082 Form 1E32 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEN, MENT 4 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 066 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-044-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : HOLVICK, DeREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE ;WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR, ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONCRETE AND GLASS STOREFRONT BUILDINGS TOTALING 85,200 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USE ON A 6. 5 ACRE SITE. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 550-600 BLOCK. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/12/85 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION I ! TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UFILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT l ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON JUNE 11, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; APPROVE:) 1-1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED f DATE : 1t U S G ATURE F DIR ' CT. ' OR AUTHORI ED REPRES1 LTIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEN MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 066 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-044-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : HOLVICK, DeREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE :WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION ('F FOUR, ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONCRETE AND GLASS STOREFRONT BUILDINGS TOTALING 85,200 SOUARE FEET FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USE ON A 6. 5 ACRE SITE. LOCATION ; LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 550-600 BLOCK. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/12/85 n ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT in OTHERS COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 ; 00 P .M , ON JUNE 11, 1985 IJ// REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; G0107—-cam xraAPPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED C IJf C 42e DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 0762N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-066-85 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-044-85 DESCRIP TION OF PROPOSAL: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - Phase 3. Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of four, one-story tilt-up concrete and glass storefront buildings totalling 85,200 square feet for office and warehouse use on a 6.5 acre site. PROPONENT: Holvick, deRegt, Koering LOCATIC)N OF PROPOSAL: Located on the east side of Powell Avenue S.W. at the 550-600 block. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL You may appeal this determination in writing to King County Superior Court no later that July 22, 1985. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: July 3, 1985 PUBLICATION DATE: July 8, 1985 1L, Ronald G. Nelson La ry- . Sp ing r Building and Zoning Director Policy Develop nt Direc r Richard C. Houghton Public V4orks Director NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. SA-044-85, ECF-066-85 PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE ?LAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUC- TION OF FCUR, ONE STORY TILT UP CONCRETE AND GLASS STOREFRONT BLDGS TOTALLING 85,200 SQ. FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USE ON A 6,5 ACRE SITE, PHASE 3 GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 550-600 BLOCK, POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL. AC'TIO N. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE C E.R.C. HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION LJDOES NDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT D W I L_L_ WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH JULY11. .R,ENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., I9 5 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 0758N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Envir3nmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects: CITY OF RENTON, PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT (ECF-073-85) Parther Creek Mosquito Abatement - The subject project proposes aerial treatment of up to sixty-five acres of wetlands for the purpose of mosquito abatement; located east of the Valley Freeway (SR-167) and west of Talbot Hill, and in between I-405 to the north and S.W. 43rd Street to the south in an area known as the Panther Creek Wetlands. CITY OF RENTON, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (ECF-074-85) Union Avenue N.E. Resurfacing - The subject project proposes app:^oximately 4,000 lineal feet of roadway improvements including installing curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm sewers, and widening from two lanes to 44 feet curb to curb; located along Union Avenue N.E. from N.E. Sunset Boulevard to N.E. 25th Street. GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO. (ECF-072-85) Application for special permit for fill and grade to allow modification of Phase I granted (SP-019-84; 100,000 cubic yards left to be excavated) and to allow excavation of 180,000 cubic yards of material for Phase II and to refill the two sites with approximately 380,000 cubic yards of material, file SP-048-85; located at the southwest and southeast corners of Greenwood Memorial Cemetery at 3401 N.E. 4th Street. SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY (ECF-061-85) Application for conditional use permit to allow the expansion of a commercial laundry (light industrial use) in a B-1 zoned district, and to allow the required parking for said expansion to be located within 500 feet of tr e laundry building, file CU-039-85; located at 903 South 4th Street. HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING (ECF-066-85) WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - Phase 3. Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of four, one-story tilt-up concrete and glass storefront buildings totalling 85,200 square feet for office and warehouse use on a 6.5 acre site, file SA-044-85; located on the east side of Powell Avenue S.W. at the 550-600 block. HOLVICK deREGT, KOERING (ECF-067-85) WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - Phase 2B. Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a one, two-story tilt-up concrete building and two, one-story tilt-up concrete buildings totalling 60,3C0 square feet for office and warehouse use file SA-045-85; located on the south side of S.W. 7th Street at the 1100-1200 block. IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SF.__. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:el_ I7 G DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 5 . 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 11 , 1985 ECF - 066 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s).SA-044-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL ) PROPONENT: HOLVICK. DeREGT. KOERING PROJECT TITLE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR, ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONCRETE AND GLASS STOREFRONT BUILDINGS TOTALING 85,200 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USE ON A 6.5 ACRE SITE. LOCATION:LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 550-600 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 6.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 85,200 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services o 16) Utilities COMMENTS: a G fir?sajo 52- --l c-:;ah etp C//eA. RECOMMENDATION: n DNS n MITIGATED DNS ri EIS REVIEWED BY:ate TITLE: DATE:66: 1-- 43 FORM {#14 IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SF REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:POL lc i=- DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 5 . 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 11 , 1985 ECF - 066 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s).SA-044-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL ) PROPONENT: HOLVICK. DeREGT. KOERING PROJECT TITLE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR, ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONCRETE AND GLASS STOREFRONT BUILDINGS TOTALING 85,200 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USE ON A 6.5 ACRE SITE. LOCATION:LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 550-600 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 6.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 85,200 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air_ 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: jr DNS n MITIGATED DNS El EIS REVIEWED BY.: TITLE: DATE: e5_64, -- FORM #14 L.,,,IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SF,. , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: TRAFFIC_ eNG DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 5 , 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 11 , 1985 ECF - 06f - 85 APPLICATION NO(s).SA-044-85 ( SITE PLAN APPROVAL ) PROPONENT: HOLVICK, DeREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR, ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONCRETE AND GLASS STOREFRONT BUILDINGS TOTALING 85,200 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USE ON A 6. 5 ACRE SITE. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 550-600 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 6. 5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 85,200 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Eartl 2) Air_ 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Anim3ls zi 6) Energy and Natural Resources z--- 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 4 11) Ligh _ and Glare 12) Recroation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities z- COMMENTS: 76 CITY OF RE NTO'1 JUN . 11985 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. RECOMMENDATION: DNS MITIGATED DNS Q EIS REVIEWED BY: 1 ITLE: DATE: FORM ##14 IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: D E S r 'N L NC DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 5 . 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 11 , 1985 ECF - 066 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s).SA-044-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL ) PROPONENT: HOLVICK. DeREGT. KOERING PROJECT TITLE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR, ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONCRETE AND GLASS STOREFRONT BUILDINGS TOTALING 85,200 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USE ON A 6.5 ACRE SITE. LOCATION:LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 550-600 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 6.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 85,200 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing c/ 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 11 f W v4 off S.c.c is RECOMMENDATION: ji DNS f i MITIGATED DNS 1 EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: FORM #14 IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 5 . 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 11 , 1985 ECF - 065 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s).SA-044-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL ) PROPONENT : HOLVICK, DeREGT. KOERING PROJECT T:_TLE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR, ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONCRETE AND GLASS STOREFRONT BUILDINGS TOTALING 85,200 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USE ON A 6.5 ACRE SITE. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 550-600 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 6.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 85,200 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air_ 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: T DNS MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED B'f : 7-es TITLE:A1 DATE: 007-A FORM #14 IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SF REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Poci F` e 5 DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 5 , 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 11 , 1985 ECF - 066 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s).SA-044-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL ) PROPONENT: HOLVICK, DeREGT, KOERING PROJECT TILE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR, ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONCRETE AND GLASS STOREFRONT BUILDINGS TOTALING 85,200 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USE ON A 6.5 ACRE SITE. LOCATION:L1CATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 550-600 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 6.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 85,200 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air_ 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Histjric and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: r7NS MITIGATED DNS EJ EIS REVIEWED BY: R,L50 TITLE: llr)f__ / 1141)12 DATE: I / FORM #14 IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW St REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 0 r- /_ 1 -r ic= S DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 5 . 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 1 1 , 1985 ECF - 066 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s).SA-044-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL ) PROPONENT: HOLVICK. DeREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR, ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONCRETE AND GLASS STOREFRONT BUILDINGS TOTALING 85,200 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USE ON A 6.5 ACRE SITE. LOCATION:LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 550-600 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 6.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 85,200 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: II DNS n MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY:c r//j Y, TITLE: 15`,/ d‘- DATE: 6 /// FORM 1114 I r R 'an Fire DeptF'"P .'cstion EureaoLPVIRONMENTALCHECKLISTREVIEWSmttf C C; REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 5 , 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 1 1985 Ju I 5 1985,ECF - 066 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s).SA-044-85 ( SITE PLAN APPROVAL ) PROPONENT: HOLVICK, DeREGT. KOERING PROJECT TITLE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR, ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONCRETE AND GLASS STOREFRONT BUILDINGS TOTALING 85,200 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USE ON A 6.5 ACRE SITE. LOCATION: LDCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 550-600 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 6. 5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 85,200 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air_ 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Ligt-t and Glare 12) Recieation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Trarsportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: S I r +PL Al.) iJ or A O€Q U A-r'e T o 1 e U I E L ) '-0 2 F I 128 e IIvtEfiLet E GN J"Elkl LLL Iac.c cSs. PL-A 51-;ovLr 13c scwc E D2AwIUc t PlCittA1Co AJO AISLL S . / So Tb#a-r 'Ftte,pez TU e_fu>-Co -c7i\ I Jc. G...o.0 -g e Toe T+Ecz J640 NI O R e Fp'RNA AT 1 0 . RECOMMENDATION: DNS MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: 7 r FORM #14 HOLVICK deREGT KOERIN CITY OF RENTON July 1, 1985 i JUL 21985 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: PROPOSED TRAFFIC STUDY WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER/VALLEY 405 BUSINESS PARK Gentlemen: Holvick deRegt Koering is requesting that the Environmental Review Committee reconsider the requirement of an updated traffic study for the portion of the property in the Washington Technical Center plat owned by Holvick deRegt Koering. I have met with Mr. Blaylock twice to discuss this matter. Holvick deRegt Koering does not intend to exceed their prorata share of the daily trips generated from the Washington Technical Center plat as defined in the Environmental Impact Statement. In order to allow the Environmental Review Committee to assess Holvick deRegt Koering's development plans for its portion of the Washington Technical Center plat, I am submitting the following information. Exhibit 1. Revised site plan with P-1 Channel Earlington Park, Page IX of the Final Environmental Impact Statement dated February 1981. Pages 15 and 16 of Appendix C of the Earlington Park Final Environmental Impact Statement dated February 1981. Exhibit 2. Holvick deRegt Koering site plan depicting existing and proposed development of Holvick deRegt Koering's portion of the Wash- ington Technical Center plat. Exhibit 3. Prorata share calculation of daily trip generation associated with Holvick deRegt Koering's portion of Washington Technical Center. Exhibit 4. Holvick deRegt Koering's proposed daily trip generation calcu- lation based on actual buildings built, proposed buildings submitted to the City of Renton for site plan review and anticipated development of Lots not yet submitted to the City of Renton for site plan review. Average case and worst case calculations. Exhibit 5. Signed letter of agreement between First City Equities and Holvick deRegt Koering agreeing to prorata share of the daily trips generated from the site. 725 POWELL AVENUE,S.W.,SUITE A • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • (206)226-1222 1 Environmental Review Committee July 1, 1985 Page Two The following documentation has been submitted to the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee to help facilitate their review of Holvick deRegt Koering's request to waive the requirement of the additional traffic study for the portion of property controlled by Holvick deRegt Koering in the Washington Technical Center plat. Holvick deRegt Koering has been aware of the constraints of the daily trip generation from the Washington Technical Center plat as defined in the final Environmental Impact Statement. Holvick deRegt Koering has, at several meetings with Mr. Blaylock, indicated that they do not intend to exceed their allocated prorata share of daily trips as defined in the Final Environ- mental Impact Statement. Mr. Blaylock has indicated his concern about the additional traffic that may be generated from the site if the buildings are 100% office and has been monitoring the potential daily trips from the site based on site plans approved to date. Mr. Blaylock has been concerned that the 6600 trips associated with Phase I will be used up before the land area defined as Phase I on the revised site plan of the Final E.I.S. is actually built out. It has been my contention with Mr. Blaylock that the revised site plan of the Final E.I.S. is a preliminary site plan and that the trip generation of Phase I should be associated with daily trips generated, not the land area. Once the 6600 trips have been used up in Phase I, then the City of Renton could require the developer to update the City with their proposed build-out of the site versus the daily trips defined in the Final Environmental Impact Statement. Holvick deRegt Koering has worked with the City of Renton and with Mr. Blaylock in particular, at great length to answer his concerns about the daily trips generated from the site at the present and in the future. Mr. Blaylock met with Barb Moss of First City Equities and myself recently to discuss the daily trip generation totals to date. Last week I submitted to Mr. Blaylock a calculation of the potential daily trips based on existing buildings built and buildings submitted to the City of Renton for site plan approval at this time (See Exhibit 6) . Based on those calculations, the 6600 trips associated with Phase I of the development would not be exceeded. Due to the dedication of the 17 acres of Tract A for the retention pond for the P-1 Channel, the amount of trips associated with the remaining developable portion of the land has increased. I have discussed this issue with Mr. Blaylock several times, but have not seen Mr. Blaylock take into consideration this transfer of trips from the retention pond site to other areas of the site. The retention pond site was originally defined as the office park portion of the site, but due to the dedication of 17 acres of that tract, office buildings have been developed more fully in the portion of the site along Powell Avenue. This elimination of 17 acres of the site allows for a higher density of office park to be developed in other areas of the site based on the total Daily Trip Generations defined in the Final Environmental Impact Statement. In addition, the heavy warehousing that was indicated on the revised itt o.. _ he Final E.I.S. assumed that the site coverage for heavygvY._ r g 911- •_ "5 of the site. JUL 21985 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 1 r Environmental Review Committee July 1, 1985 Page Three Holvick deRegt Koering's development to date and site plans submitted for approval assume approximately 30% of the lot area covered with building for the business park portion of the site and 35% of the lot area covered with building for the office park portion of the site. These reduced building coverage areas also allows for a heavier concentration of office development than was originally proposed in the revised site plan of the Final Environmental Impact Statement. Holvick deRegt Koering understands the concerns of the City of Renton regarding the daily trip generation of the Washington Technical Center plat. Holvick deRegt Koering feels that the documentation submitted with this letter indicates that Holvick deRegt Koering has not exceeded the original daily trip generation associated with its portion of the Washington Technical Center plat. Based on the submitted documentation, Holvick deRegt Koering requests that the City of Renton proceed with processing the site plan submitted for Lots #3, 4, and 7 of the Washington Technical Center plat. I look forward to hearing from the City of Renton as to the acceptability of those site plans and the documentation submitted here. If you have any questions or need further explanation, I look forward to discussing this with you at your convenience. Very truly yours, HOLVECK deREGT KOERING t" Loren Davis LD/gb Enc. CC: City of Renton Corres. Larry Springer Ron Nelson Dick Houghton D 3 219a5 BthLD i1v;yUN1tvG o&T. EXHIBIT #1 L Ili Q Qili • ii : fla a w 0 II Zi W1 4" + i/WOMl 1 r IIJiTy 1 1-1•A*4.11. ___ ° r I I i s \ v Ii7Y U 1 I z-- ii,- NI a-, -J 1),- ,_1 ,t. i 1 ion \ . Pbw f O r A_r ,....„0:: . 7 1.7, ____ 4 ti ___,, - -iiiitrib....,g2 • 'c., -, ,. V lttt.13--------- 0 at n O C.) z rV O i 1.-o tl,ii o 6c=‘4. l 1 cy li 04 . c-r7\-,1/4 CV ®'Fl 1 f'''T)0.1?--1 - 5') I, '"' 'N). 1/4 .liU 219B57, —, f N1NG DOPY. i gUi©"N,IZ t W 4. REVISED SITE PLAN WITH P1 CHANNEL EARLINGTON PARK R. W. THORPE &. ASSOCIATES ix- 1 _ P.M. Peak Hour Daily Trip Generation Rates Trip Generation Rates Land Use Trips Per 1 ,000 Square Ft) Trips Per 1 ,000 Square Ft) Range Applied Range Applied Heavy Warehousing 4 - 6 5 6 - 1 .2 9 Light Warehousing 4 - 8.7 6 7 - 1 .3 9 Business Park 8 - 12.5 10 1 .0 - 1 .5 1 .3 Office Park 15 - 25 21 2.2 - 2.5 2.4 These ranges reflect the various types of business that occupy a given land use type. Not knowing the exact character of the businesses that will occupy this development, an average or slightly above average trip generation rate was selected by combining these nationally observed rates with observations at local developments of similar character. When these rates are applied to the phased development profile shown on Figure 1 , the daily and peak hour trips shown on Table 2 result. This shows that at full development the proposal will generate about 19,825 one-way trips per day (9,915 round trips) and about 2,650 one-way trips during the evening peak hour (the majority of trips - approximately 70% - will be traveling away from the industrial park) . About one-third of the total daily and about 40 percent PM peak hour trips will be generated during Phase I of the development. Difference in trip generation in Pha- ses I and II is due to the relatively large portion of office development typically a high traffic generator per unit floor area) . These figures reflect conditions on weekdays and reflect all vehicle trips including those made by employees, service and support services and truck pick-up and delivery. Except for isolated studies which are site or industry specific, there are no universally accepted standards for estimating the amount of weekend vehicle activity at a complex like Earlington Park. These studies suggest, however, that the weekend day traffic volume is less than 10 percent of the average weekday volume. Most weekend traffic at this development is likely to be associated with the office and business park. Weekend truck activity should be very limited (less than 5 percent of the average weekday truck volumes) because the overtime labor costs associated with driver and ware usl ala men make normal truck transfer operations uneconomic. Thus e_e'i 15- OP-D.NG 1 ZDN N 1 alk TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION Daily and PM Peak Hour Phase Heart' Warehousing Light Warehousina Business Park Office Park Daily TotalPMPeakHourDailyPMPeakHourDailyPMPeakHourDailyPMPeakHourDaily PM Peak HourI206037022653402335305006660II18153251015 0 1050 135 10,300 1175 13,165TOTAL3875 163569522653403385 . 440 10,300 1175 19,825 2650 i v® J5aaLo0 1- 5 rt a19 ,A -, EXHIBIT #2 Lot 3 & 4 i H 82,000 S.F. Business Park i 50% to 75% Office t . FU UKE DEVII OPMLN I Lots 5 & 6 54,000 S.F. 9.4 ACRESs 100% Office 41 Limmillossioseammvyy.M•t mil,I. 1'.: y. I R v `ji' 44 I AI 4101 3.6 ACRES I N Y? - t'I f',s M 1 S.W. SEVENTH ST. Lot 1 - 580 0000 S.F. Business Park I- i,.Lot 7 xi it PHASE lA Lot 2 68% Office 60,000 S.P.t51 1 I r BUILDING 3 IOW:, Office 1i+ p 4500 SI 500 SF AVAILABLE) 9l A 111 "' f PHASE 1B Lot 8 100'., Office Vl BUILDING 12 15,780 SI 4.0 ACRES 1' 4" 1 LlnslD) Q BUILDING 13 o )I Ifilli Ay 8,604 SFFI IP i 1 LEASED) BUILDING 14 I I '' d , ,, , . S.* 4;,., 0 9,782 SI n-- 0782 SI AVAILABLE) t ' ifit4/4 PHASE 2A Lot 9 100% Office r BUB DIN(, 16 II INIIIK(SI IN11 Kt I III/NI i' lit III DING 17,,IOI;v I 111),I1K(IN.I KI4 I K Ni ll tIlthir•.,, ,re Blllll)ING 18aTo3; 9.71.11,1 I IIINI11KI1IN,l KI.I III INI f N BUILDING 19 1 . t 9,760 SF 12 I.I I,^ll y 1 it/NIA NS1140(II/IN, N INS 4O• t1 t WIL f 1. yrna11 • r soCITY nr g VI0 \'i N \2?) 11 Il' VICINITY ,NAP 2198^5 Gu+ GiZGNtNG © . 4 WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER RENTON, WASHINGTONtPT Li IROLVICK deREGi KOERING • DEVELOPERS MASTER PLAN 4° EXHIBIT #3 EARLINGTON PARK: TRIP GENERATION VERSUS WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER PROPOSED TRIP GENERATION EARLINGTON PARK FINAL E.I.S. DAILY TRIP GENERATION 19825 DAILY TRIPS TOTAL E.I.S. AREA 109.30 ACRES LESS P-1 CHANNEL AREA 17.00 ACRES LESS ROADS 11.00 TOTAL DEVELOADLE AREA 81.30 X OF OF F.C.E. AREA 55.10 0.68 13436 WA. TECH. CENTER AREA 26.20 0.32 6389 TOTAL 81.30 1.00 19825 L CIT` ©s• i Z_N RR, 11L 21985 1 • EARLINGTON PARK TRIP GENERATION EXHIBIT 4 VERSUS WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER PROPOSED TRIP GENERATION EARLINGTON PARK FINAL E.I.S. DAILY TRIP GENERATION 19825 DAILY TRIPS TOTAL E.I.S. AREA 109,30 ACRES LESS P-1 CHANNEL AREA 17.00 ACRES LESS ROADS 11.00 TOTAL DEVELOABLE AREA 81.30 WA. TECH CENTER PLAT AREAS ACRES X OF 1. OF AREA TRIPS F.C.E. AREA 55.10 0.68 13436 H.U.K. AREA 26.20 0.32 6389 TOTAL 81.30 1.00 19825 AVERAGE CASE LOTS 1,3,4 @ 30% COVERAGE 50% OFFICE 50X WAREHOUSE LOT 2 16600 BUS. PARK LOTS 5 & 6 35% COVERAGE 100% OFFICE LOT 7 35X COVERAGE 100% OFFICE LOT 8 34000 SF OFFICE LOT 9 66400 SF OFFICE LOT # BLDG. AREA DAILY TRIPS TOTAL DAILY OFFICE WAREHOUSE OFFICE WAREHOUSE TRIPS 21/1000 6/1000 1 19000 19000 399 114 513 PRPOSED 2 11000 5000 231 30 261 BUILT 3 & #4 41000 41000 861 246 1107 SUBMITTED 15 & 16 54000 1134 1134 PRPOSED 7 60000 1260 1260 SUBMITTED 8 34000 714 714 BUILT 9 66400 1394 1394 BUILT 285400 65000 5993 390 6383 WORST CASE LOTS 1,3 4 p 30% COVERAGE 75% OFFICE 25% WAREHOUSE LOT 2 16600 BUS. PARK LOTS 5 & 6 35% COVERAGE 100% OFFICE LOT 7 35% COVERAGE 100% OFFICE LOT 8 34000 SF OFFICE LOT 9 66400 SF OFFICE LOT # BLDG. AREA DAILY TRIPS TOTAL DAILY OFFICE WAREHOUSE OFFICE WAREHOUSE TRIPS 21/1000 6/1000 CITY ( Ran JUL 28000 10000 588 60 648 PRPOSED 2 11000 5000 231 30 261 BUILT n 2 g85 3 & 14 61000 21000 1281 126 1407 SUBMITTED 5 & #6 54000 1134 1134 PRPOSED 7 60000 1260 1260 SUBMITTED LF 8 34000 714 714 BUILT 9 66400 1394 1394 BUILT E3UILDit GIZONIN DEPT. 314400 36000 6602 216 6818 EXHIBIT #5 HOLVICK deREGT KOERING June 24, 1985 Mr. Roger Blaylock Zoning Administrator CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER/VALLEY 405 BUSINESS PARK TRIP GENERATION Dear Roger: Holvick deRegt Koering and First City Equities have met to discuss the concerns of the City of Renton in regards to the trip generation from Washington Technical Center/Valley 405 Business Park. In order to provide the City of Renton specific perimeters as to the trip generation associated with each of the individual properties, we present the follow- ing prorata division of trip generations. Total Daily Trip Generation Earlington Park Environmental Impact Statement 19,825 Daily Trips of Daily Trip Area Development Allocation Ecilvick deRegt Koering Total Developable Area 26.2 acres 32% 6,389 First City Equities Total Developable Area 55.1 acres 68% 13,436 81.3 acres 100% 19,825 The proration of the trip generation for each of the individual properties is based on the final traffic study projections in the final Environmental Impact Statement of Earlington Park. Holvick deRegt Koering and First City Equities are providing the City of Renton with the preceeding daily trip allocation so that the City of Renton Planning Department will be able to assess impacts and mitigating measures based on the individual properties. Holvick deRegt Koering CITY (X RE TON 1.1 Lill J U L 2 1985 Bill: DAG/ZONING DEPT. 725 POWELL AVENUE,S.W,SUITE A • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • (206)226-1222 Mr. Roger Blaylock June 24, 1985 Page Two and First City Equities have agreed to this proration and our signature below provides the City of Renton with our agreement as to the proration of daily trips from the site. We hope that this allocation of daily trips allows the City of Renton with the ability to assess each individual property as they are developed. Very truly yours, HOLVICK deREGT KOERING Loren Davis LD/gb CC: Greg Byler/FCE City of Renton Corres FCE File ABOVE MENTIONED PRORATION AGREED TO: HOLVICK deREGT KOERING Date FIRST CITY EQUITIES Date CITY O:'RENTON TO N 1 JUL 2 1985 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER! Vi 405 BUSINESS PARE: EXHIBIT #6 DAILY TRIP GENERATION ACTUAL & SUBMITTED FOR STIE PLAN REVIEW LOT #BLDG. AREA DAILY TRIPS TOTAL DAILY OFFICE BUS. PARK WAREHOUSE OFFICE BUS. PARK WAREHOUSE TRIPS 21/1000 10/1000 6/1000 H.D.K. LAND 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 16600 0 166 0 166 (BUILT) 13 & 14 85200 0 852 0 852 (SUBMITTED) 156 #6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 60000 1260 0 0 1260 (SUBMITTED) 8 34000 714 0 0 714 (BUILT) 19 66400 1394 0 0 1394 (BUILT) TOTAL HDK 160400 101800 0 3368 1018 0 4386 TO DATE F.C.E. LAND FCE TO DATE 25400 20000 533 0 120 653 (BUILT) FCE PHASE 2 48000 1008 0 0 1008 (SUBMITTED NCLUDES 32000 S.F. TOTAL FCE 73400 0 20000 1541 0 120 1661 APPROVED IN ORIGINAL SUBMITtA TO DATE TOTAL HDK t FCE TO DATE 6048 P 1 \.% 0 jUL 21985 OF R4,'1/ 10 ; ) ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR tttrp MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0 fD SEF'j00 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYCR June 26, 1985 Barbara Moss Director of Planning First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4040 Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Environmental Review/SA-047-85/SA-044-85/SA-045-85 Dear Ms. vloss: The Environmental Review Committee has looked at all of the proposed site plan requests by First City Equities and HDK as they relate to the underlying Environmental Impact Statemeni:. The Environmental Review Committee has considered the situation at their meeting on June 26, 1985. Their conclusion is that prior to issuance of any additional environmental determinations, additional information in the form of a formal traffic analysis will be required under authority granted in WAC 197-11-335 (1). The Committee is invoking this standard instead of a formal requirement to provide a supplemental Environmi3ntal Impact Statement under authority WAC 197-11-620. The Committee wants the analysis to look at the following factors: 1. A worse case analysis of total development of office use. 2.To:al site development of the entire proposal (including all tracts identified in the final plat). 3. Circulation analysis of the general area with the elimination of S.W. 10th Street frcm Powell Avenue to Dakesdale Avenue S.W. For The Environmental Review Committee: ctlatuu.4 Ro r J. 131a lookY Zoning Administrator RJB:1665Z:c1 cc: Loren Davis 1010 S.W. 7th Rcnton, WA 98055 OF R4,A 4 y Q ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR sal o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co 09grc0 SE0c10 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYCR June 26, 1985 Loren Davis 1000 S.W. 7th Renton, V/A 98055 Re: En Jironmental Review/SA-044-85/SA-045-85/SA-047-85 Dear Mr. Davis: The Environmental Review Committee has looked at all of the proposed site plan requests by HDK and First City Equities as they relate to the underlying Environmental Impact Statement. The Environmental Review Committee has considered the situation on two meetings on June 19, 1985 and June 26, 1985. Their conclusion is that prior to issuance of any addilional environmental determinations, additional information in the form of a formal traffic analysis will be required under authority granted in WAC 197-11-335 (1). The Committee is invoking this standard instead of a formal requirement to provide a supplemeltal Environmental Impact Statement under authority WAC 197-11-620. The Committoe wants the analysis to look at the following factors: 1.A worse case analysis of total development of office use. 2.Tctal site development of the entire proposal (including all tracts identified in the final plat). 3.Circulation analysis of the general area with the elimination of S.W. 10th Street from Powell Avenue to Oakesdale Avenue S.W. For The Lnvironmental Review Committee: 2t--7-S(c. 1RogerJ. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:166' Z:c1 cc: Barbara Moss D rector of Planning First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4040 Seattle, WA 98104 ti o IbTY OF RENT FILE NO(S): si9 -O'/ J S 4 ® :BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT CF- O D L - 85, 1 MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. PHASE 3Pleaseprintortype. Attoch additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I LTYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES Holvick, DeRegt, Koering ADDRESS REZONE*(FROM TO 1000 SW 7th Street L:: SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP O TEMPORARY PERMIT* Renton, WA 98055CD yy CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE 1`J SITE PLAN APPROVAL 335.00_ 206) 226-1222 r=3 GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON VARIANCE From Section: NAME Justification Required Mr. Loren Davis ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 1000 SW 7th Street SHORT PLAT CITY R'i1tOi1, WA 98055 ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 206) 226-1222 Q WAIVER Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: Holvick, DeRegt, Koering ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 1000 SW 7th Street Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP FINAL Renton, WA 98055 P.U.D. NAME: f TELEPHONE 206) 226-1222 0 Residential 0 Industrial a Commercial 1:::) Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS 1000 Block Powell Ave. SW ED TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY FINAL Vacant Field MP PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Four one story office/warehouse NUMBER OF SPACES: buildings with parking and landscaping ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 187.00 SQ. FT. ACRES AREA. 284,131 6.5 TOTAL FEES STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 0 Accepted 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On b1: Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: U N E 5 - ) q e S Accepted Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) ROUTED TO: Building CO Design Eng. CEI Fire El Parks 0 Police Policy Dev. CD Traffic Eng.Utilities REVISION 5/111RR Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). Lots 1, 3, and 4 of the Washington Technical Center Plat. S 1/2 Section 13, Township 23 North, Range 4 Fast, W.M. N 1/2 Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. AFFIDAVIT I, T.nren 1)avi s being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner,Downer of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS r DAY OF 19 .U NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHIN ON,RESIDING AT rAfit9Z5NamefotaryPublic) nature of Owner) 1000 SW 7th Street Address) Address) Renton, WA 98055 City) State) (Zip) 206) 226-1222 Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 LOTS 3&4 I--I. 1 fr, _ s ti ti- I 9. -.,.s, u L--- 1 rt 4, 144,,.fi"e..,I; [I ____,—:----- 7( c_4. 2 4 ..„... .,,-. — 1 IIIFUTE1 , ;[ i I- .i- ILI- I 1 = LoT 1 rri; ‘ 71 S.W. SEVENTH ST. r 7 i 1 Fri 1 Id -Dja IIIT1 1_ 1 I gexIstIn I lli I I>: l•1.--...- 1 1 earlington Industrial park •< I a by budingtor; northarn N itCITY OF RENTOTI •Ct---JJ i. 3 1*\, _ ___ _ 11.7.._________,- ,JUN 1 j 419 . f 1 I BUILDING/ZONINC . r' 77.30 1 0 • D . i...— 7.•31: 11 r z 1 .I 11011101 a-a) - lai 1'Tu WILA l'..- •11 u.,,I RENTON l' c.,.,,• ci FE E T millEnctunicrumei /1.0 100 200 300 fr. ISViggark7S1.4.M'AWEr• ''it. N ' Al...„itl.t... 1..oif,,* i 70p4..t.:°0ri•i"4.: .: •;0 p R OJECT WAK. 7-0kN. 5i STATE. -1- _ i--1 cot,,L__ c.:71 ni.7,-E 1-, - V lOB NO. a, 10,,ve i .,1! -•:. '.4; y,-:,!•A DATE i-6*14:,,,.. ..,...is..... ,. i.,'..4 v 0 D . cit qt. fiv,Li:,., arotwowillia Ile.r437.14.4p4 virc...-.. DETAIL v11.1i-7-1 N.1,A.P it,,, "lketilTECT-.5,` SCALE 1":---0',.31-0" Irt.v.-1 ,iivivvvi)116,tr ,al,,,••• ...I, -0.c A 4%0. jo".•.. r J.* fili:::."‘)1.42e.11;ii,"!..1).t1•611 010...e0 I4 ... A. -it- • SHEET - i:0E-i 14 Ito.:49. . LO dr' 1. 1 1f. 1`I i.. 11- 51 R JUN 4 1985 ECF: KF - D s• a O LU: City of Renton ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLISTo9 TEt) SEP E? Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmen:al agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your )roposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instruction: for Applicants: This envircnmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the government,dl agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Compete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies. plans and programs), the referenc.s in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1.Name of proposed project, if applicable: Washiigton Technical Center, Phase 3 2. Name of applicant: Holvi,k deRegt Koering 3.Addre!as and phone number of applicant and contact person: 1000 ;3W 7th Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Loren Davis, 226-1222 4.Date checklist prepared: May 1, 1985 5.Agency requesting checklist: City cf Renton 6.Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): ConiplEtion of work scheduled for Fall 1985 7.Do you have any puns for future additions, expansions, or :her activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. No 8.List a iy environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Environmental checklists had been prepared for the seven existing bui=.dings comprising Phases 1B and 2A of the business park. 9.Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other propo 3als directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List ny governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if knc wn. FloJd Control - King County Hydraulics Building, zoning, storm drainage, sewer, water electrical, mechanical - City of Renton 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the s.ze of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Construction of (41-) one-story tilt-up concrete and glass storefront buildings for a total gross building area of approximately 56,000 sf on Co- acres of land with paved parking and landscaping. The buildings will be used for business park and light warehousing. The buildings are being constructed as empty speculative shell structures. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate map y or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this chec klist. 1000 Block Powell Avenue SW, Renton, Washington See attached vicinity map. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 2/ c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Silty sand with gravel. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None 2 - e. Describe tI purpose, type, and approxii uaLe L,pies of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Some fill material will be needed to bring the site to finish grade. This material will be trucked in from a convenient local supplier. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, if the clearing and grading occurs during a long rainy period. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 70%. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Use of siltation control devices as required by Civil Engineer to prevent runoff during construction. 2.AIF a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction equipment engine emissions during construction, possible dust if clearing and grading occurs during dry weather, and asphalt odors during the roofing and paving installations. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None required. 3.WA TER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 3 - 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None, the complete sanitary and soil sewage system will be designed for approximately 700 building occupants and tied into the City of Renton sewage system. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Rain water falling on the AC paving will drain to catch basins which will be tied into City of Renton storm water system. Rain falling on the landscaped areas will be absorbed into the soil. Roof drainage will be piped away and tied into the storm water system. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No 4 - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surfact id, and runoff water impacts, if any: Slope raved areas to catch basins and tie the roof drainlines into City of Renton stoLut water system. 4.Pla its a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other o Shrubs l( grass crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some existing grasses will be removed and new landscape materials will be introduced to match existing business park landscaping. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: See Item 4b. 5.Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. 5 - d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, None 6. Ene^gy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric, natural gas for heating and cooling and business operations. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Comply with Washington State Energy Code. 7. Ern ironmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic noise 6 - 2) What types levels of noise would be createc associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis Jr example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Increased traffic noises during normal buisness hours of operation Monday thru Friday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Construction equipment and c,eneral building noises will occur during the framing phase of construction. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None required. 8. Lan and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is undeveloped land at this time, as are properties to the north, east, and west. Property to the south and southeast are developed as business park. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no existing structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? None e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? MP, Manufacturing Park District f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? MP, Manufacturing Park District g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 700 people will be working in the complete project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 7 - 1. Proposed n.__Jures to ensure the propL. .s cuipkalible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Compliance with the Renton zoning code. 9.Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The One story building height is 19 feet. Principal exterior building materials will be nainted tilt-up concrete wall panels and glass/ b. aluminum storefrontitnetia'tenvicinittewould be altered or obstructed.a views in y None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Architectural building design and landscaping that compliments the existing business park. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Vehicle headlights primarily at the early morning, early evening hours during the winter months . Exterior lighting at the parking areas during the hours of darkness. Sunlight reflection off the window glass occur- ing primarily during the early morning (sunrise) and evening (sunset) hours on clear days. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not known. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Orient light fixtures toward the ground. 8 - 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Longacres race track, Lake Washington. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Site at one time was a golf course. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Attractively landscaped open areas for employees use. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See attached vicinity map. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? No, 2 blocks c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? When completed Phase 3 will provide approximately parking spaces, with none being eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe indicate whether public or private). No 9 - e. Will the pru,„,ut use (or occur in the immediate __ini of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No, existing services are adequate. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The work force will come from the existing population base. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Utility easement runs east, west across the site and along south half of rtheeast pert line. b. Describe the utilities that" are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity Sewer and storm drainage, City of Renton Natural Gas Normal building hook-ups will be required. Telephone Water C. SIG NATURE I, tie undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is tru: and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any dec laration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Prc ponent: Name Printed:Keith Maehlum Maehlum Group Architects, P.S. 10 - Jiase JT s M y4 Kim Lighting, Inc. C*•, i%:v., i SUBSIDIARY OF ti CORPORATION j r.t3 n.,. GITY G EZ ON F ¢• 4jJUN 19851• BU1-DIIV G/ZGN!NG rl a PT. 40' Scope 38' ir- 36' 34' 30' 28' 26' 24' 22' 20' CITY C47. 52 TON 18' JUN 4 1985 16' 14' 12' 10' EKG—Series 200 EKG—Series 100 EKG—Series 300 8' 6' 4' Phase II Phase I Phase III 11 2' 175 Watt 250 Watt 400 Watt 250 Watt 400 Watt 1000 Watt Applications Pedestrian ways Collector and local roads Major roads and whiteways Plaza areas Intermediate commercial Large parking lots Parks Medium size parking lots Expressways Residential roads Security lighting Sports areas Small parking lots Residential roads Security lighting im Lighting, Inc.Building entrances Highways Automobile dealers Printed in U.S.A. r s U"- h.) y''•f:^ . i.. ,', ' krR, 4 k,"" T.i ;,,. 1 y„+j" •, •r s,i! ,..' iri ° t t 1 -, '; . ''.. .'...`'. . q...,,,4 ,,.;:-,.."..:".' V- 40_', Jr fJ - e k r .dN {os,.y ri c+i' ' C ). a'- 1 •7'.: i'+` ` ,,rfn y + .v, _ ^"..} ^ 110t TaC .. t r N'•t !s t ` r 3r }! t lF tIta;' :.'..«"';'.; r'2:-1::,4-.1.?'••*. StiVz.1:im•-e-ft,-•4.019'4.-: ',--,•:••;••ii., .c'•4•q.0*".s:14-7.1%•••_• • s' •.....1% --_,.: .1. ... ,-....---4...„,,4., ,x,.„,.,,,,,,:_. :4„....., ,';‘,` 04,4','".•- Y,--- 4",..i..' ''rt. M i Y' d k" .wl' ''S-, X'.^ s * E r , yk t .' t"t:1'y r• 1/,zYt`1j`.1G } G' y ay n ri: J 1' f r err,••-•4 •.. JWJ Y- Q1 nr, by is: r r t`` *il-4; ! rr t - ••G ••eo• '=• '7'.1Y 0• . " •i M 4 t I,(' j1 ti .,- x"5 a-I 1 103.06_.. 10.- --, —1: IE i, . 151TlL TY z Et SE4M E;N T 1 y 0 1 N . a •- it .. t • Cw' 5 zk4tO > • cnpdf ti. L1J r s , Syr{ a 4R: v rat^ ''x' ° )fi , .•` 3 • , i4.1 4s,1` AU13' FILE. NO.79CJ7 00S48 •? +o :• N 0 ra N oi a'oo''E 1Of UT t_I i.Y- 8 Wf LK I a-? IE'-I 1.v ` EASCMNT j a, ,0 • 1ist.. 1iRr 1 ' r_¢ V4 Mg t l 4y 1t Jrfa 4 '. y..' b tt , 3 ` , ., .. ".... h. .'{ ! r ` ;•,, ) {y,n....„, 1, ICl.... 10, ', : t.ti • ! d.-.--- ` 4--{ 6 r,• a 4,1. ' ., ..4.4 kNri ib. ,14. 7{- .‘ " S' Y 9 Tit, 'ar r rt •' F. i Q 1!'t 1 1 '' t aii a' t W. R'v,y 4t'1"'f f , il+' R F tit • y0' t 1r..1 n ': .. G9° v(LrLt ya 1w vt ).- , A y -:, r k. t9 rt . '4., 7 r, r„ f Xa . n 1,6,E F , ',. ? Y, I. S.. ta ti 1k.J i a y • 1 Lu a. 4 .• • 1 +Y,• p.' Y... V S y• Y 1i.. r -'1.t i- t a 41 S_* rky'' y'` r: r ) i'410 i.4 ,E 4_•. sk _ iSdi,. 1 1 - Fff t S : i: 4•$ b+,• y >{i'4-! yyi r`'• t 4y - a ` , K i__H r'yf '` I ' W .y47 • v'ti + t<. 6 t`t,,,^ h' A^+•1 4 p',` ID -. F, : 1. 4„ ysr s......i.,:,*11,. ,:It,r. • .40, • , r,..4i0i411.7i., .,A14,;!,-'.,...t.N.", J 4 tq, fy1 ` .} f q7- ax •Vk v { r itl 4 "'`t n.. - ft,-,4••••1,4,,,•44.'''-'•••'"• ' ."•'! '• '''''''..e': Ill k''"4''' '.: Ts rtIt r 1 c.,'' . ,,,,„; 4.1 ,, 4,, fi :-.:-.!'.•.1 u 2 2'. yr r k. x,ii w c03 00, t ;rz'"^181 50 YriD ! t 200.50. . . n N 03 45'00 F 585.00 N 0i'45700'E 650.00, 1,. t. to a c . 11wS01'45r00"w 585.00 NIY:: r' 1 , 181.00At I L_ , UTII_ITY & VV! LK, j I I r r.- GCi=Mc:'NIT 10, kv,,: , 43; 04`t} 65 HOLVICK deREGT KOERING OF Fr rTOiON June 5, 1984 PJ 1-2 t foil [2, JUN 71984 - Mr. Gary Norris CITY OF RENTON PU1LCING, Z;,,NJNu CPT Traffic Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER LATECOMERS AGREEMENT Dear Gary: Pursuant to our conversation of today's date, please provide me with a recorded copy of the latecomer agreements for the traffic signals at the intersection of Powell Avenue/Grady Way and S.W. Seventh Avenue/Hardy Ave- nue. Holvick deRegt Koering's mailing address is 725 Powell Avenue, S.W. , Suite A. The latecomer agreement for the traffic signal at Powell Avenue S.W. and Grady Way requires that O.W. Properties provide 17.9% of the cost for the traffic signal. It is my understanding that this percentage was based upon the requirements imposed by the hearing examiner at the time of their site plan approval. Holvick deRegt Koering was unable to negotiate an agreement with O.W. Properties for their contribution towards the signal cost at the time we constructed the signal. Therefore, Holvick deRegt Koering is anxious to receive O.W. Properties fair share apportion of the traffic signal at this time. It is my understanding that the City of Renton will issue a request for payment from O.W. Properties for their fair share apportion of the signal. I have attached to this letter Attachment A of the latecomers agreement for the traffic signal at Powell Avenue S.W. and Grady Way. The Attachment A defines First City Equities Phase II property description in footnote no. 1. In addition to the attachment, I have provided you with a marked up copy of the plat showing First City Equities Phase II property. Also shown on the plat is a portion of Holvick deRegt Koering's property that was released to First City Equities in December of this year. That portion of the plat is highlighted in red and was included in Holvick deRegt Koering's Phase I portion of Washington Technical Center plat as defined in Attachment A of the latecomers agreement. orl l7Q5 37 C 4-7-t- AD 725 POWELL AVENUE S.W., SUITE A, RENTON, WA 98055 TELEPHONE (206) 226-1222 Mr. Gary Norris June 5, 1984 Page Two If you have any questions, please contact me at my office. Holvick deRegt Koering is extremely anxious to receive O.W. Properties fair share apportion of the traffic signal at Powell Avenue S.W. and Grady Way. The signal has been up and operable for approximately nine months. Each day that Holvick deRegt Koering has not received O.W. Properties fair share apportion is cost- ing Holvick deRegt Koering additional money in interest costs. We look forward to hearing from the City of Renton in the very near future. Very truly yours, HOLVICK deREGT KOERING aCrlfrilt:17--sikr646 rn Davis LD/gb Enc. CC: Dick Houghton, Dir. of Public Works Roger Blaylock, Planning Department Ron Nelson, Public Works Department Latecomers Agreement File Traffic Signal Files ATTACHMENT A 1. PROPERTY OWNERS AND USERS AND FAIR SHARE APPORTIONMENT O.W. Properties @ 17.9% = 15,000 WTC @ 35% 29,400 • 44,400 2. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST Plans, specifications and estimates 5,500 Contract price 74,000 Construction inspedtion, closure 4,500 ESTIMATED TOTAL 84,000 3. DAILY TRIP GENERATI' N CALCULATION Based upon total development, Washington Technical Center will generate 14,230 trips per day. 50% of the trips will use Powell and Grady - 7,115 trips per day Washington Technical Center was assessed 35% of signal costs per Hearing Exarhiner) 35% x 84,000 = $29,400.00 29,400 7,115 trips per day each daily trip = $29,400 4.13/0aily trip 7,115 trip/day 4. WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER PLAT, PHASE II REIMBURSEMENT CALCULATION( 1) Washington Technical Center total developable area = 81.5 acres Phase 1, Washington Technical Center total developable area = 28.5 acres Phase II, Washington Technical Center total developable area = 53.0 acres Portion of Washington Technical Center's share in item #1 above to be paid by: Phase I of Washington Technical Center = 28.5 Acres = 35% of WTC 81.5 Acres 35% x $29,400 = $10,300 Phase II of Washington Technical Center = 53.0 Acres = 65% of WTC 81.5 Acres 65% x $29,400 = $19,100 FOOTNOTE( 1) Washington Technical Center, Phase II property description. Lots 11 & 12, Tracts A & B of the Washington Technical Center plat, recorded under King County Recording #8211300925. ii, '.,:e..... rit L...,,,,, :': ! ,, 0- fok, ! fr"4,. r"" N n..-- 1 0 0 u d Ocur ISoo. ei.,.. V 1.,..Si: S1/2 SECTsuN 13, TOWNSH'R 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST. W.M.N1/2 SECTION 24. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. CITY OF RENTON aryls try MO KING COUNTY. WAS1-iINGTON F P•08 6.9!M T I I i T2 l OF'WE ROLM CIE-444U U OF VICT 1011 Is, 40 o THE NC[ETN Of -4f 07 7 of iTANSNIR 7S NORTN. INUM S IASI. W.N,. RING warn'. NA)MINCTON. IAT rHt AS LH(AtrPRIORS BUSH ROED C HITCNING Inc., P.S At 6'rNINq AT ,wl NORTN(Al Tt11lY CORM(R or T, L LIN ttY 9000FILETWSAIDLICTION ))410 1(1*6 A 0•OIN1 C.SM TN( NCL7IN LIN[ Of tA9l• i 1 .J p,9 1N$1(711 MOO%tui ,!Milli NO. I,ACCORO'NT TO Nit PLAT AF(010 ') IN*Vlu04( J" fOr0•' ALATT.PAD( 1O.M IYNO COUNTY,WASH.T•otow; TN(NCI N.:*TNSMr'IS pry.CERTIFICATE oz.J' t7•Lr wit, ALOM6 S.AIOHO.ry LIME AND THE NOI(TN LIME Of rAntIN.TON INDLISTAI• 1101,4Af. PAIN NO), ACCORDINO TM( ALAI t(CORO(O IN 1'4LUVI •A. Of PLATS,M{[ TIT ') * I I5IT'Nils FEAS Of PARE NALt MPA IS RASED TONELWOW M ACTUALgo,IN u11q COUNTY WAj,Ni.4rON, A DIS1 AwC1 Of N4.4) 1(11 TO 7NL )KX+T1Nt ST RIAwTr ANTI 1, . MI31CM Of NE 'll. ONE-Ii1 (I a 9:n10N 1), Tow Dill 74 NORM,CONNER Of SAID EMI INCDYI INOUSTRIK .ARK W. 71 TN(NM( MN I•I4'79• .EST t 4 IASI, r.N., TS A M( WWI. ONE-NAl F n! SI('Tldi 74, TTNNSNIP 71 ADM,KOY. NI. WEST 1Ia Of SAID t11 Ir01gl !PrjSTRIK TV A.t t [ AST, EN., THAT DI TAND[S APED LOT STMN;f M[ .[a.1 STAAIrnr NE RIOT,XT[NSION. ISI4.)9 /EE1 TD no SQ:MfRT IN h oOo0f 7 ITS sTVlNE ILr TVA, 1fif K1U1(N1s)AT it SET AND THE ANDPACIFICMILNATINOW011llinoM7f1(AN,LIIIC.NRTMLNT•IDf-rOAYDt rHLHCL SSWrt 'li W 'NI caul) A•+.7 TNAT I :.AT( FUILr RIOT? cu'P{AS SIAND CAfWtI. • T7'7)')0•WILT k012 SAID SaTN TATV)Tl AND RlLA1ATIONE 9U'/EIMIIK ICD WIN DC 191p1r1A101<(1/ )KfRYIENESLS10 FLIT t A 4,(( 100 Tiff F.N PtATTINp,N[SYSRT Itt1i TNIEX KAStRIID Al RlgiT APrIIS 10t THE 1Lsn,1(Y R1u1+T-OKAYIINECFANIAS1Nf.NT 1Ol M NI4Mt NT UITW MID TTI.OAARY C(YiS'itc,low As Au[wi'YiOfSCRIR[O IN IrSTRALHTS RI colors LINDER 11'C MA Y AVo1TTR'S WILL 44aE 7[/,/,,1lc. Oi V..,1/76))l1 Arm 77017404•NI, N-R[CUMI(O VAMP NIDITON'S FILE 1[I, 71n11MAp1 L N1TC NH•:.A A Al,SH[JCf....„1 11•N'46•Al3T, PAPA/in. ',in, SAID r(ETTI 7 RIONT-0Of-NAT LINT, WRfIPIpTi f10. 61)4I7)1.1) MT TO M[ PONT Of WIIY AnIR1 Of A + R00.W(141RADI US CUMC 117 TN(t(/Tr 1N(MC( NCRTNELsTEN T A0140 SAID 011110 Ni ARA:D1171141. Of 3)6,60 2111 TO1 ISA101NTOfTANDRICT1TNUK{ NORM TS•0/'46'N[7T 111.3e FCCT TO A POINT ON 111E 4j.,•. Po•Ft1' IO:M AIgCT-cc..IAr LIME Of TN[ No'CKIRIMf.D{ASF 147fT F(Yi PCia.'ACA.T DITW AID Al...' SA CERTIFICATETtrannSTlaT( WAIN 89'04' f ID so)lI1[n)7E TO T ( x a ATtApF TOOTRADIUSWeftTOOffRILM/ m.(N1/ RCSRKr MD Hone(snFRr XOf: SAID I mo'CERTIFY THAT Att. F11(REITry TAXES MT PAID, TW(TRI[AS{Pl7(T QIT..F..AT lIK AMD CLIME AA U15T AN(y a A91,97 'UT TO A POINT YNINC AR( 1 OQ INWfM Sr,C'Al ASS{SSNEJ113 r2RTIr EELO< TRNC0ICT$ MONQ NORM 77.76'Or NCST 767.9E (TIT TO NE POINT a CI*YA As M'S OFI IQ FOR(AUCTION MU CNATT Of A 61).16 FOOT RADIUS CUNT( TO D TlllE AStf SSM(X'1, f1) , r4o ICrT ALL SiY f.IKA Ni 4 OIST II LIFT) 'Nod/ waTHRESTERT NOrr SAID 0A MY r n( PODILRTY tR F,NiOMIC( a 171,))FEET TO MC NpIEIYISTERY I WE M TRACT 71, ] IN7U'IN O}'TAIWO, I1I01f1T[D, AS TTRECTS vt1C q,1AIMDeaD'IL ASAPS RLXT1)N IrrAt1AP/)s1 MINCE WAN 41'1A.07•(AST ALCM MID CR AVOWS L LOFT OMC- 1M VSE. nE. sik v7'•F2 r`EPiWrraNiS1EtrllrlaT)IACT 17 A DISTNNLZ O/ )16.16 FIST, MCN; )IoITN MID IN FILL THIS, 9604 pAT 41,`71'36•01• EAST KOG NE NORM LIN(a SAID TRACT 27 A UIS7m,.x a 130.0R A7 rAINti . 19CYI 1HIT' INTACT Ia1N )0'74'Or EAST ALCM NE TORN LINT Or SAID TRACT 77 A JDISTNC( Of 754.57 FELT, N1t71CX WON 77•S7'17•LAST 40AV SAID i4XtT L111f Off ICE a THE OOI TRgS,tR450.93 VIET, 11e( NORTH 46•72•7r EAST K!1/. SAIU NOR t •111E 0 TRACT 74, SAID 7M 1N LINr AND NE NO17N lkt.SVA'LCICNT N(•5 RLCTON ) i10f1I7fi l 374.A6 FTRI 4MliaLSCUMR)•17•»• EAST XOC SAID NrITM LINE 111.17 FITTI NEXT SOITN G CRAM COIA EASNINGI+n•71')r PEST KO, ON (AS1 LINE a SAID TRACT 74 A DISTANCE Or 167.77 PE[T CRAM OOKIPTtIQLliA llLll1iDR1' scum. ))•o1'71• EAST KO(: SAID LAST LINr 174.'31 TER TO Mf /C N L IIICOPNCSOWS'670 FEET Of SAID gawk ISI nowt Sam.66.17'00•CAST Al Ow I N(A[Dt C[RTtFT THAT NNE M[NO DEL'SCANT INCUR, ASSESSMENTSNCALLSPfCIA. ASSLSSIRRTS ON ANT OY fs4T P MID Notts LINE 7761.17(([T TO MC LAST LOt Of SAID SECTION IS) NEWT I. SNTY HOT IN OORAINLD OiDICAT10 A[II•VLSI KOPIO MID EAST LOSE•IO.OS PELT TO THE'.PINT OF bEO 14011 i. STREETS OE AYEMiES a(nN's RI.,.Ir r A.. A In ,N w1 E'01• NEDICAT 1011 i'K*+'r((r *a Yi'Xt4,44 OIRL,CTOR. CITY7OF RE]no RWEIr NJ. PEN cur TNISt POESEN 7. THAT NT, 1st U'SS:RSIGNITO, OWNERS IN iTt sINPLEOfTarINCNERDYPLATTED. NEWRY an.wE m.ls PEAT Mn DCDICATT TO he(USE ArMteYAli r4 1.f AUP.if fl1PfvEA Mt STREETS, AV[Nu[S,rW41C VI( A(Ej.1 AND DRA'MAetPACILIYI(S ANOwr1 7N1R[ON AND TN( ut( THERE°, 1CIR Up L•C MILLN/+" LAII RT+f11Y Of AS 7IS VEMSAVRPQI(l: ALSO TN( R114N T TO MAW( All MLCi11A1TY SL0(1 10R CUT4 EJ4AMIIIkJ)AI[1 Ar•I-kWW 'ILiC DRT 0/ Al o/.1AwnP14LS, V•'ON TN( LOTT AND 91.00•S SHOWN Dti 141T PLAT IN not 1 11AI.INAL RI A.ONy1 l[ •ISAOIN Of TN( 1TR[STSAAIO Av[NVit l 111TE31 Irrmm01 IK NA*E SET O1 KENO ASL .: -IDEPVTI.\•`A[ l) AE{N'` Ipl{I mat AIID O/FICIAt SSEAtJ. YIa aHi,1;1 rni R:N4,9EATTL[-RIFTS ISra,) V tD T' grow mo SADITATIW OE ARIf AACALWSW*mrlpr l td GSAN'+IED Mil)APWNDYNI >*Li_..Jxr a 1..1. 5 Etta. LEDINENT& T, IItt71.•TCTEN.. WAIN&Ea;I TAT)UN OLP% awry MOT RETAT[ N YIr6N N60N' tam is RIVES ) OY!•MTT1M()R Of PAP!II)WAITS It# TSIN I v OF yUaR_, EMI, r!RS 1,I7y'LY AIMSARCA DErTM[ Mr 4. -mu,AIO Ammo A:I(, DAT or •LI•• IismMNg11f• ` AA-_.._. T AOCRINO, A CAA II TO NI ATOM TO N nl..Q.yt,fentr iACildttAnY f M11 AM IA(•ORPONAT low, Ill) gYUT'III '()0I;so 1 3j.)-'. L 'may E.F...A ,( iiii . 4IN .1 P'dI M 'fL .. . 114n1M;xy, NC AC,.Wit I7.CA0 'N I' 1,10 (*srWM hr. 10 nr TN( D)RtC:ENI A try rear mo TO,TARM1f ACT M.01X1.1 nr SAID cu.spo'ATt(w Fag TIE f1/"•^•Ilq( NS(1 4U P. OSf S TNARI I R 1A.7 Ib5 D. *ID rN DATN STATEDNoyMPAR 'WT11TY712E0 IO I.0.0,17E (Nd. SAID INS11[N[AT so NEM1'M1 E4A'EINER, CITT Of'moo601101.t M T/fi 1701IPCM11pN, IAAAII.,D AND Adv JIDT®TNI aY N 2 i+N131 4K MiMd A(S)OFT K!t ^..A'. WI MAY tttl T--nI1 ,,//aE SR.7TSi4 rEIM/Mfl • flreliLDA6 Ry'+.Gr Vr' MAR au IPO A'• nar N•'• •••-'I' IA .Mr •W. Ttl( Tl,M' CM"IS14D!IY NT CCIP'7lL N 11Q' PIMP'VS 01 YM6w11CU' US WITS ATi..r,Y7ry't Ld 1N1Di. J : I.. PT7rtO1.rAr11tlTr1 M*II LIlPEblN"4'Y' t A ' III, S N .. • e.• 4 , p A, J,'.I••iS1LtC'N:k•6 di te C !1•$"`- A t"P"p I•' IS4IE.I'^.• Y ,v .. Ctf)v 0.tJuG+` A"8a OP n1V4011MC11 v LY ;>k„'.IS` Y, J 2 COR•T)1440 CIRTIFICAT( I•16- I'I/AF0 Mr;(9IC5C•D AT'NCNEQEIEST a rst CITE CUUNCII THIS_DST IX1905-A1 PIIr(JTES PAST MO A Opts 9MIN AINofPLATS, NUNS RE(aRO%a[IAB EYA:.0T7. i V' ` R.170 C 4EN, RAASIK7011 T% - NIYaIOW OfRIfus* NW ELECTIONS ARPtATR,Y 1ilfEJRIHTIJILLDIT 1 IIIXT:.0. Sd( fC sno9se_. EET 1 OF 5 I . A., A c ; ! 7 k,F e $r v • , L. CENTEFINSI6astaxbraati, 114.011IA/811110 S1/2 SECTION .13, TOWNSHIP. 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST. W.M.NI/2 SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST. W.M. CITY OF R NTON KING COUNTY, WASHING T ON I.r1.'1i300925 /3..1./91 /o'L') 0 UTILITY.ITAt[M[NL, f ' GG'^ rrrff ^___'y s-s.ts •y, R U BUSH ROED HITCHINGS. Inc. P.SP.S.1V. L 4-1 "-'"- . ' Ill e iS,fot• ',roearw I dt;e TILlair I ,i i EARLti L. NGT°NASt. Q. 1 t .a 4 i ' i 1 t,LUVV Rg3 PAGE 10 r 1 I THOMAS Avg. F.W. a I c sir•\ 1 r I 6 ,AIL II LA3jM INT Yi.. _-__-_- I e..;I•r;L•:..p ar300Yr es AE' - ..1Jl 4 ilC 7QL r lIkk I 1 q'urlll Tr l N.\UttoL 90• tTO.IM1tA$M(NI ttWtS EA1E.NT I I T• 1,kit, i r AYO. 11Li N0.A1.1t06f I 1 e'...'..•, y..l. r • j r"'30 UTiIITY ).I + I YAttU .$T I ' `id.'; I ,' F 7. 41 131 I N.\`S:.. i 1 N wit• NYw..••• .... M+= wows R... 3 W d W LI IT I • I I I x •= Y• W'f4•••• es N W.M M.•• 4- ON I 1 lr 4 t-- l' et•1.•II• i/ M... 1YI.; I 1 I I I- M'A•'w' e•. W..11 -1.N J1 ! i Ott t I VIINv vv.. 8, ?A I I i ,+ 5: tt L.ft.9p' o 5.41 1 q'uTILI Tr t I . tar-,j I I Tl•-- 1t2t.M a ovl^* s P j P`'.I Lt Il 1 MEMT_ I I I 1 1 _A.— i sao,"meN til POWELL AVE. s.Mf. if o tt m•a as.x--•....._-_.-.•—. 11122-01_.vy star: H I.-It II i j I j • r/"(: . S. Lt0•V11LrTr A wAlr M"'4 Y 4r Q I ' i- __.__ t='T 1 tAts,A.LNr 1 ' LITY A w1UI ; j 5 f! 70',,, rr l{ I 1 .a IJ1 f Emthr I \ r 111 C AIL I J T I IOI_.f. t\ .p \'P< I ''; fir: JO' SAIL INSAI) I I 1 I lI'\. 9 \9C`\ s-+ i+ r tAaEwtwr I 10i ' IPI \A \\ j 1 j .¢_y,{ 3'M rx,.„,I„, n' I I 1 1 I \ \ 1 4 1 I I • f L.Lrt MlaT• n i I I I I 1 ` I UTILITY BrALTrIENrt _.- I t-,, ,,,ec'_I ,,, , I.ao•aA1\eoA0 (N .EMt"r, QI 1 it WI itl>tY I I.. :iii .r unufr sttEl.eNr I , Iiiji --- urI-Irr A WALK 1 6a j I111. it IA 7 iIiiy iIt 4 1 'It.; .1 ,to' Mj arcuL•x•ac / ' i _ l II/ jI( loc . Yo' t s•to oo¢ oawo I Il. I' 1I y rt(.. o•j I,M f MENTSA9E 1 •7•• 7'111'/IRIr Y.EI-,I,Y ln•...._.':.+ i' i,.r. r. •uri ITr ¢ i_.. r•o ROAD EA, :,IENT•---" f" + - IID.JI I ,i w y I `` y, .• 2 'D $t;RLCt Eh"Y,L t'i 2 OF44'11t I-••• 44 • .. MAPS-RENTON SHORELAN, 25 r .1 ' AP !,-41- Mr"' "). ( I' I' '•• A.i,_01 i .4. i N k.,. 1 Li " ,,...)\ 71! A "r" e•Ai r. ,......z, ii..... ‘,..., i i , _..., ,,....1 ei ' ....CENTER Si./2 SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST. W.M.N1/2 SECTION 24. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST. W.M. • . . CITY OF RENTON KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON Iv .Wairsmtsr!TR±, -__..-_zttfesm,f•.,roLr..14194-.:.; j 3."'BUSM ROW C 14/TCHINGS. Inc., P.12. it• , \I I • . " •i I . I 43•11104•1: ' .. 1 I 0. II, I ;I P',' . • 1 ; 0...) V1 1 , 1 i 0. • 7 , . , 1 1 e.. \ .. sallio.3.1011'AIZ.:::.:" , t..**. ./ ; T 7'. "th-r's.--xl 0,A.,;40:PCIJMitl.„..,„.„ //4......•"'"****. I i iii:A, V Pk, • %. 4,,,k,„Sp,* a 0 .III I .. 4; • t I Vt. 4f,r*"."'"•••( . e. ; -'' tV ,'"----1,1 •4 .. 9 -,...t: 1 Lc. V111.101 LAICIACIIS . S.. „./ A. / 1 r"'"•\•••.:...„`,..•,,./.. L.A.. ,1 44 0 Ca / .•ds 1 ICrlarertc4;;;Y0... •"*"*••••......... . i 4* /6/ 0.11 / • A ... 1 i Nt \4/0 •N' 'fep.< 1 81...S.P.:.. _ :1 k // .4..s / 114;: •_.L.i''....''''. . 9".'.: ..'27.?:'' Plr'.'74.i7:'.4:17. ..4.11 . / I I I% \O „>,....../...................... f 1, :5.,..g.e.:%" 10, 4,.„t, _:...1 1 , ....1...................._ i 11 t•••••••...,, ••••ND supoLF•mr.., .----• •-•.......... t i ii 1."•• 544MA(''::, PEN-r- ' AL 1 1 4..A.,..(`•/,' y-----MN .SHosiE. I 1 4,. `% • t1 c"..i I I LANDS Trt [010.101.1r I. 1 • 1•,.., i':711I4-1.m:).140 Mil.....pl r,. 1,\.1„.,%.•.% 14. • I2.....I.........•x 1% I I ! 0 .11... t a.I i 0I., , • irt 1 a r 1 Imo T Y LAU mem T S I 7..... • i cri 1 "I 4 4.1/4 •ii i - p- li 7, . tr '' '. 1‘. 11, 1441:,4 -- 4.4).' T••••••71•"--"": j,...._ ii,45.,t . 1‘.....11' 4.. 7 I I . 1 41 1 1 ' i 4.;) r 1 elf.; .•4 i 1 : /4, 0e. ( g., . ri . :*-.4" 4) tiOr • • 4 6 s., 4 : i 'it Ian 11100111•0 Wow I III 00'44'000 WOO 0 0 0•••••••••• NCOi•*: 0 .1 . A •Or10410 11 .64111IY.4.I T I L I TV if Alif MUST 1 1. t :i 4' ii:•..702N, '° e i f ..y.' 1 00.1 00.... 10!I.* 0.0 Tamely. II OW 10•0I0 0... 110 No 0.in• 41 ;! t:101/49; C' 0 40'or 04. . Ps.PI SP IP 46 Pdl plo•4 I. ••44 9 410 °A49 I a•40•44• O... MI MO •.4*Po ic62be°OA i•v....". . .04•••• Imo• .4.• 6' ••qT •"‘4` c 0.1• ....01 4.0. . 0.114etVr........................" .iii.,..4.16.17::AV 104(NI T : ;;:::::. •01.04 •••.4. : 2 i . ' ::111.,.id CR le,. Ifili11.1/ Ft ', i h i 4 ' : 1;li • io.4.—1 I II v... i• , 0 i I II°/ ' II 1 I i.:• G:':EET 3 OF 5i 1 8‘.3,9e 11 1 A R THE PLAT OF is MAW i . _ 6 JN TECHNILAL CENTER SI/2 SECTION 1.3. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST, W.X.Ali/2 SECTION 24, TOWNS, IP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST. W.A. CITY OF PENTON KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON 3 I 11 BUSH €iOEO i HITCHING8, inc.. P.a. li.P. D'. HI ' 1?) ,%.% t,‘ 1. 14'0 . iq I tiacr s Ili 1 (r :• toi s , , y,.kl 1Ji.ci .A, l'YTIl7Tr SATiit16MT S'1 Bt Olt,y •v f 4, 1• r •• 1 .I. i f r alf TfN(1 11 Af¢A ../ l, 0,Tit. 1 1 I DETENTION TQ CITY PARCEL 11s 4+TG:RM WATER DETENTION) ' `4N ,N c f RrSERVING AN UNIDEFINED AREA FOR THE 1 S d N.f pI EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE LAND ENCOMPASSED BY 12 uttt.trr ¢Attr¢rt , '-'%I •PA..nHll .AS(• 4vxwrqpru..1 $' ` THE PLAT OF WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER FOR'''`Moab, t •' I, rw11s steTl CO'TAINMENT OF STORM WATER RUNOFF ANC FLO00 M Wk.' ':R STORAGE UNTIL SAW DETENTION AND FLOOD Ii• v\ A—'.:' WATER STORAGE IS PROVIDE!) FOR THE SAID PLAT.5 I lam` AREA TO B.E DEFINED AT THU TIME TRACTS / B ARE i i R^f t 4r' f.s o'rLATTED INTO LOTS OR BEFC•RE JULY1,1 05. RtMAINING 0i^db A. I! tI' /L• rK 1 41% q f I AREA TO BE USED BY CITY OF RENTON FOR FLOOD st ovWATERSTORAGE,AS THEY SO CHOOSE, •i'`0 t+ g : / A n\` i:kit w oa on'»'e q od o.•Ate g' I lo•,,, r gyp.. 4e ae v.I .\\*. t i , 1 { L' x. wWA l2Ix' lSA.I ,.+VZT. roll tj'' i;11...a. MATat Uq1.¢AIIDty/ : I I J0.ti in } M T A.! DITCHii„ tSA/{M171T Aq Ma i p/ 1. f q i a I r fb '/ t.,I .1.. Y'I II r Alf fAo!! !'• i ; 'ti+ r !P r N cr•r.••'. A.... t/ Q• I• I q s.n I r/ i. MOM Mt. w.w Nv\•r•gY.t \ i V': q i a e,°,I 7 T% q THEPLAT Co- 1 f ,,,,.qqs*,, gym. ( R M . +y GI 13 iwe.us . Q •' ^ s4 • r • p r Oi,( T y1 T: /2 SECTION A7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.X.1 ' N1/2 SZC :.:ON ei;;,a, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W. . KI . NTY, WAS'HIN'3T©N I-8211300925 ix%. "e-/'O Y n. i% i 'O sus.: AOEA C NITCMINGS. Inc g ; IN Pa i I: • , •, firt IA', i. ,Z 1 1 1I 1 • l • ' »'t• fir.—. .. ,,,_ .•l —. 1.4 1 v?41rv,T. 1 --.., a.u..KT' t Z{, Al D®' YTIfJTY i t T l bIR 6.164••{IDKMT I ,, 1 w III Q{ 1131 @ 1 6'Y441Tr 6A1(1soLt•11 , 1•r' 1, ,Iced: JO• 1 II &1iI I kA9aP kT ill UTILITY I EMT 1 ( 41 I:- S%- UTBLITY ICAS(tgMT Y r-;.\ 4,...-M ' 4La.. 1 ..r lO'SIMI* rAt[MGP Y SfAYO. 'IL/. air,.slosh• ,, { 1 AL(NCkT bJC TM( 1 KL ns/14 1• V'. AS {rQ. I . 1 AA NO:It 1J660 1 gyp. 1 t' l'• Z 6' WAr(f!LIN( ae(14c MT yy9. ll tt lrr••iAY ri6 1; 1»6Af6 11•iS 1 I M WI MIM TNIh A6LA) .` 1 4- 1. urY metzbork t 1• a/ 1 7.0' Itn s ft k.P a T f1?+o Dn.au+e, .M 17.•it S{ _ 1/A1NjI4$ rlu NO. 6JE.46L,1 ``t1 n {•' v• 1j t 01 L.e• 11 fr.."'r 0.0 i t Ma Wow r,r.r r.+zomai M..11 vm..n..,,m......,._.. r.r x..r.. OF 2:.W nvoramigIONIIIIIIffaii ENDING• OF FILE FILE TITLE