Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA85-062BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE MICROFILMED 0 cu- ot02- S 8O o " w= GQR ° gym ma .m , .. , Sw ° D mnc7 di ,, „.(fir- 371. a-. O-cn_-1 WacoLs< cn.1mo"wN -.--m-, cna cno: ° 0 -<a m3Ww3.. 7pw • ro70 caow. . w m f_c1ci 3 —m nano ' c0Di,0o 0 o Zmmom _, y ro 5a o - ro arnm 8 00£ a n c g om<-<z t ao °' o Q 0 a w - 3 v 0 mm as z` 0o o-1 z-9' E. 0 0- -. ° CD _0go0) m>nz_zn 4 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATIO g° W 2 w w z o g 0 Imm>m o - . a 5- D. 33 a70o m.o p~"w _ 1- w * f)• -qDZD Audrey De Jo i e , being first duly sworn on oath st o f 3• z ;o =-P n 91 w r m' o z m o 0000ma -• 9.03 he/she is the Chief Clerk of the s a a, w m a a co w o ;v 13 ro D y w 3. pppp w —a u) a a2 f O F 'T1 N <LN1 y 1.13 x 3,) VALLEY NEWSPAPERS v wn°0cD-n*a Eivm Dm40 °ScdwD Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe i $ cog 24 3 Q pw1®w c 3 M m a$y Ti m c 9j07 — 00nro o;csg cc,, 7 ..m 7 (n-.."'ro N tD .h.O H O n .-"• N.•8 O z ..Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said ne ^' 3 m o7...4 o o 0 w o o , N;O 19 i v, U°' 0 o n!o,' w m ao are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more L m R W S n 8 o 0o0 003'd`D - months rior to the date of ublication referred to rinted and 57'v ir N s:fD o..-w o; w 0 v g c)-Q=0 oPPP w ,,, m ;,5 cna =v w v, 0 E 0 a5intheEnglishlanguagecontinuallyasdailynewspapersinK70Kmoto=-.m o_'< al Sao coo w z g c Fr, a 0 i 77Fi a Way a o Nas *P,..)m o m County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approve) w a n •>= a - a o a c Q m w w a ?w v o 9,c a > > o w E.p c)cD a c.w w 0 c mnewspapersbyorderoftheSuperiorCourtoftheStateofWashiaa- t co a) S' 9...) io a< -rp.c z_• m 5•m m n King County. c):m$ ..6: maaw ,5-0wm nuw m o° i m m o 0 »•.0 ' m, =-0sD,-m 3 o5.- cco J,2--3.. 80 .a, 5.- =alCO4. C op 00: •duo The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the D:m w' o g,a ; o x.w o o f vv o w-"no o C Journal , Daily Record Chronicle X, Daily Globe News , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Notice of Environmental Determination was published on September 2, 1985 R1098 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $35.64 f3;.;r7- - t` 4 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th day of Sept 19 85 ti Notary Public for the State of Washington, OCT 2 2 I985 J residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN 087 Revised 10/84 ESUILI. NGIZONi:AiG DEPT. CU -0(02 — NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY Audrey DeJoie , being first duly sworn on oath states that THINGTHERENTONERAT LAND IS NDRE USE HEARING he/she is the Chief Clerk of the IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RE- NTON,•WASHINGTON ON SEPTEMBER 17, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER VALLEY NEWSPAPERS THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS. CITY OF RENTON,PARKS&RECRE- Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News ATION DEPARTMENT Application for Substantial Shoreline DevelDailnewspaperssix (6) times a week.That said newspapers tion of a mewnt Permitwi to allow the Ypublishedlion of a new swimming pier and applica- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six tion for variances from Section 7.12.06 months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published from the City of Renton Shoreline Master Program to allow an oversized dock; in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King located at the southwestern end of Gene County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal Coulon memorial Beach Park on the shore onewspapersorderoftheSuperiorCourtoftheStateofWashingtonforTHEfLake NCO Washington. by P g KENCO COMPANY King County. Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a tilt-up building have approximately 27,360 square feet of The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News warehouse space and 3,040 square feet of office space,file SA-065-85;located on the Journal , Daily Record Chronicle X , Daily Globe News_____, (and west side of East Valley Road and approxi- not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its mately 820 feet south of the intersection of S.W.27th Street. subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a RAMAC, INCORPORTED Notice of Public hearing was published Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a one and two on September 6, 1985 R1106 story selt-storage building having 30,850 square feet of area to be located in a B-1 zoned district, file CU-062-85; located at The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the 1-405the 100 and l north ofockofronMapleBronsonValleyNHighway) of 9 Y) sum of $35•64 -. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITEDPERSONSTO BEOPRE- SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 17, 1985,AT 9:00 A.M.TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 11th day of Sept 19 Ronald G. Nelson5BuildingandZoningDirector Published in the Daily Record Chronicle Sept. 6, 1985. R1106 otary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN#87 Revised 10/84 CITY o; LIU OCT 22 CBS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION RENTON LAND MUSRE HEARING RENTON,WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY Audrey DeJoie being first duly sworn on oath states that THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING he/she is the Chief Clerk of the IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RE- NTON, WASHINGTON ON DECEMBER VALLEY NEWSPAPERS 31, 1985, O ING A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION: RAMAC, INCORPORATED Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News Application for conditional use permit to {'`( allow the construction of a one and two Daily newspapers published six(6) times a week.That said newspapers story afeetof self-storage to building having 30,850B-isquarefeetofareatobelocatedinaB-1 are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six toned district(file CU-062-85);located at ' months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published the 100 block of Bronson Way N.E.(east of I-405 and north of Maple Valley Highway)."in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Legal descriptions of the files noted County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal above are on file in the Rgnto9 Building and newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Zoning Department. '' 1. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID ,I King County. PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- I SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 31, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M,.Tp ''The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Ronald G. Nelson i '< Journal , Daily Record Chronicle X, Daily Globe News , (and Building and Zoning Director not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its Published in the Daily Record Chronicle DecembQr 13, 1985 R1267 subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a w...ai ; yw :, ., Notice of Public hearing was published on December 13, 1985 R1267 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $23.76 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17 th day of Dec 19 85 61e: - Notary for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington.VN•87 RwuW 10/84 I_2 L7 Public N ;e Public Notice NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PANY(ECF-113-85) DETERMINATION Application for substantial shorelit s ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW development permit to allow the constr COMMITTEE tion of a swimming pool for the residenc' if RENTON, WASHINGTON Frank Lee,file number SM-012-85;loce d The Environmental Review Committee along the shoreline of Lake Washingtoi at. ERC) has issued a declaration of non- 5121 Ripley Lane North. significance for the following projects: ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS, II RAMAC,INCORPORATED(ECF-095-85) ECF-089-85) Application for conditional use permit to Application to allow for the construe n allow the construction of a one and two of a single faced, off-premise adverts: ig AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLI( story self-storage building having 30,850 sign measuring 12 feet by 25 feet;loco id square feet of area to be located in a 8-1 on the north side of Bronson Way Nortt ,n zoned district, file number CU-062-85; the Burlington Northern right-of-way t- Audrey D e O 1 e located at the 100 block of Bronson Way ween Factory Avenue North and Su, et being first duly sworn N.E. (east of 1-405 and north of Maple Boulevard North (letter attached). he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Valley Highway). GLACIER PARK CO. (ECF-109-85) CHARLES HENDERSON (ECF-106-85) Application for site plan approval or Application to rezone 30.99 acres from Arby's Restaurant and a short plat of +o G-1 to R-1, file number R-080-85, and lots and one track for roadway purpo: s, VALLEY NEWSPAP application for preliminary plat approval to east side of West Valley Road at thee 22 10 DailyNews Journal, DailyRecord Chronicle, D family lots into a plat to be known as block. Sunset Trails," file number PP-081-85; Further information regarding this ac: in he of Duvall Aven)le is available in the Building and Zos ig Daily nt wspapers published six (6) times a week.' N.Elocated. at theon t he eaeastst sisi de block. Department, Municipal Building, Ren n, are legal newspapers and are now and have bet CHEVRON, U.S.A., INC. (ECF-117-85) Washington, 235-2550. Any appea of ERC action must be filed with the Res 'n months prio to the date of publication referred to,1 Application for conditional use permit Hearing Examiner by December 23,1: 5.' in the Eng11 h language continually as daily news and site plan approval to allow the expan- Published in the Daily Record Ctiroi .Ip sion of an existing service station by December 8, 1985. fl1256 County, Wa hington. Valley Newspapers have be removing the existing pump islands and !_ ii+ newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the St canopy and installing a new, larger pump KingCO Unt island and canopy facility incorporating a mini-mart building, file numbers CU-097- 85 and SA-098-85;located at 1419 North 30th Street. The notice i the exact form attached, was publisl- ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LI MITEID PARTNERSHIP(ECF-119-85)Journal , Daily Record Chronicle X , Daily C Application for site plan approval to allow not in supplement form) which was regularl` the construction of three, two-story office subscribers during the below stated period. T1 buildings totaling 120,000 square feet on an 11.74 acre site,file number SA-100-85; Notice of Environmental Determine located at the northwest corner of Lind on December 9, 1985 R1256 Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. EVERGREEN SPA AND POOL COM The full am unt of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $56 4 3 4 c - . Subscribed and sworn to before me this 12 th day of Dec 19 85 . C i Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN 4187 Revised 10/84 kz. le) S C OF I THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ral BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9q o- FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 9gtE SEP- E° January 27, 1986 Merritt Nielson Nielson & Smith, Architects Box 1062 Mercer Island, Wa. 98040 RE: 'File No. CU-062-85: Ramac Dear Mr. Nielson: Th Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published on January 10, 1986 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sir corely, Fred J. Kaufma Hearing Examin FJ<:dk 1 1 68E cc: VCity Clerk Building & Zoning Department 1151E January 10, 1986 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: RAMAC, INC. (NIELSON AND SMITH) FILE NO. CU-062-85 LOCATION: 100 block of Bronson Way N.E. (east of I-405 and north of Maple Valley Highway). SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a one and two-story self-storage building having 30,850 square feet of area to be located on B-1 zoned property. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approve as presented. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approved with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on December 10, 1985. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on December 31, 1985, at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this application. Exhibit #2 - Site and Landscape Plan. Presentation of the report to the Hearing Examiner was made by Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator. It was pointed out that this proposal was first presented on September 17, 1985, but on September 16, 1985 the applicant requested the ERC to reconsider their determination and this matter was held pending the outcome of that determination. The issue to be reconsidered was regarding access to the site. The request to the Examiner is for a one and two-story self-storage building having 30,850 sq. ft., to be located on B-1 property. Topography in the business zoned area adjacent to the subject site is much lower than the single family residential subdivision. The Environmental Review Committee had prohibited access north to Bronson Way from the subject site, preferring the access to go south through the proposed office site and access directly onto Maple Valley Highway. In the reconsideration request the ERC stated they did not see an impact as long as there is some type of physical barrier to stop the traffic from short-cutting through the site onto the Sunset corridor. It was accepted by the ERC that the barrier for traffic could be the proposed gate by the applicant, and they were not concerned exactly where the gate was placed as long as it prohibited traffic from passing through the site. Continuing, Mr. Blaylock stated public services are available to the site; the site does not have direct frontage onto a heavily travelled public street; and the applicant has created the illusion of one building by extending the roofline and open areas. It is felt the intent of the Comprehensive Plan is met in the design of the building, and Mr. Blaylock reviewed the criteria to be considered for a conditional use permit. Parking is provided on-site to the east of the building; accessibility is the only concern if a possible limited access problem becomes apparent because of sight distance and turning movements from Bronson Way. The ERC has also stated in addition to a gate, the turning movements off of N.E. 3rd Street be limited to right-in and right-out. Ramac, Inc. CU-062-85 January 10, 1986 Page 2 The Zoning Administrator continued stating the proposal is separated from the surrounding uses by steep slopes, highways and a City Park. The multiple family residents in the area may very well be users of the service the applicant has to offer. It is felt the proposal does not intrude into the area, is aesthetically pleasing, does not create a view blockage, does respond to a need in the area, and is not expected to create any impact on traffic because of the low activity use of the site. In conclusion, Mr. Blaylock stated the proposal appears to meet all of the criteria, and the applicant should have the option as to where to place the gate, suggesting the gate be manned by a manager of the facility and not a card gate. The gate should be expandable to a full 20 ft. wide for fire emergency access. He had no further comments at this time. Calling for testimony in support of this application from the applicant or their representative, responding was: Merritt Nielson Nielson & Smith Architects Box 1062 Mercer Island, Wa. 98040 Mr. Nielson stated there are two entrances into the storge facility and it is envisioned that the gates will be manned by a manager or possibly a card-operator for those persons in the office building who may wish to pass through the property to make a right turn onto Bronson Way. It is not their intention to have the driveway become a shortcut between Third Street and Maple Valley Highway. The building was located on the frontage of I-405 as a means of providing good visibility from the freeway and is considered a low-traffic, low-noise generator. The projected hours of operation are 8:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M., seven days a week. Mr. Nielson advised at the present time it is intended that the manager of the apartment to the northeast of their facility will manage the storage facility. Calling for further testimony in support of the application, there was none. There was no one to speak in opposition, but wishing to comment was: Randy Rockhill 141 Capri Avenue N.E. Renton, Wa. 98056 Mr. Rockhill spoke as a representative of the Monterey Terrace Community Club. He stated they have no objection to the project as presented but expressed concerned over the access and egress. He then stated if the recommendations presented by the Zoning Administrator in his report are fulfilled, there would be no further concern by his association. He did express concern over the use of the property adjacent to the entrance of this facility on Monterey Avenue, (currently owned by the applicant), and wanted to be sure at some time in the future this lot would not be converted to an access to Monterey so traffic would be able to proceed from Monterey to 3rd. With these comments, Mr. Rockhill stated there were no objections to the project. The Examiner called for further testimony or comments on this application. There were none. The hearing was closed at 9:30 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS 1. The applicant, Ramac, Inc. (Nielson and Smith), has requested approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a self-storage service facility in a B-1 (Business/Commercial) zone. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered in the record as Exhibit 4#1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. Ramac, Inc. CU-062-85 January 10, 1986 Page 3 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. There was no opposition to the subject proposal from any member of the public. 6. The subject site is located in the vicinity of the 100 block of Bronson Way N.E., at the northeast corner of the intersection of I-405 and the Maple Valley Highway. While the lot straddles the area from Maple Valley to Bronson Way, the immediate proposal would be located on the northern two-thirds of the subject site. 7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 8.The subject site was rezoned to its current B-1 designation in two separate actions. Ordinance 152.2 was enacted in August, 1955 and Ordinance 3677 was enacted in November, 1982. 9. Access to the site resulted in conditions being placed upon development by the ERC. The site, located as it is between the Maple Valley Highway and N.E. 3rd/N.E.4th, would provide a bypass to the Sunset/N.E. 3rd/4th intersection. Staff wants to avoid this result and required that the site provide a gated access point to avoid creating a defacto through street. In such case, access could be either from the north or south but a gate would limit through passage. 10. The applicant proposes constructing an approximately 30,850 sq ft building, one and two stories in height. Pursuant to Section 4-711(B)(3)(n) self storage facilities may be permitted in a B-1 zone by conditional use, and then only if the use is contained within one building. 11. The intent of the section is to forbid the usual barracks type arrangement of cubicals and storage huts in the zones generally designated for commercial development. 12. The subject proposal will actually consist of the usual arrangement, but it will be confined within a completely enclosed building. Vehicles will be able to drive into the building, as one could drive into a large warehouse, to gain access to the storage compartments. The exterior will be finished in wood siding, trimmed with blue and cream, and will be topped with a grey concrete tile roof. 13. The 24 foot high building will contain two separate two-story pitched roof sections connected by a one-story flat roofed area. This configuration will give the building some variety when perceived by passersby. 14. Landscaping will be provided along the Bronson Way entrance. In addition, perimeter landscaping will be installed around the entire site. 15. Traffic to the site is not expected to be substantial, and comparisons were made to an office building which exceeds 350 trips per day. The proposal is expected to generate substantially less traffic. 16. While not part of the subject proposal, and still in preliminary stages, the applicant will probably develop a smaller office building on the south portion of the subject site. CONCLUSIONS 1. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-748(C) which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; Ramac, Inc. CU-062-85 January 10, 1986 Page 4 d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking will not occur in required side yards and, that traffic movement and circulation will be safe; f. Noise, light and glare will not be adverse; g. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use; h. Adequate public services are available and will not be burdened by the proposal. The requested conditional use appears justified subject to assurance that access through the site can be controlled. 2. The proposal appears to generally conform with the Comprehensive Plan. The use is a specialized commercial operation which will be housed in a building which will make it indistinguishable from some smaller office complexes. Approval will not have any adverse affect on other commercial operations. 3. Commercial storage facilities available to the general public appear to be in demand so that the use should serve the general community need. 4. The subject proposal does not appear to have any adverse affect on adjacent property. The complex appears well designed and the topography of the area should provide more than enough separation to afford protection to the residential community to the east. 5. The parking on-site appears to be sufficient to serve the use. The use will actually be drive through to enable persons to get close to the storage areas for dropping off and picking up possessions. 6. The major issue, access, should be satisfactorily addressed by the gated access required by the ERC, but to insure that it does not become a problem access through the site shall remain reviewable by the City. If at any time in the City's sole discretion, access through the site becomes a problem, the City shall be entitled to curtail completely the through access or otherwise modify the access. 7. As long as lighting is directed inward, the topographical separation will assure that light does not adversely affect neighboring properties. Similarly the topography should buffer the neighboring properties from noise. 8. The landscaping appears sufficient to buffer the use. The entire periphery of the site is landscaped, as is the entry. 9. Adequate public services are available and the ERC's conditions will assure safe turning movements and prevent the site from being used as a detour route. DECISION The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following condition: Access through the site shall remain reviewable by the City. If at any time in the City's sole discretion, access through the site becomes a problem, the City shall be entitled to curtail completely the through access or otherwise modify the access as it determines appropriate. ORDERED THIS 10th day of January, 1986. 41-11—i FRED J. KAU AN HEARING E X AEXAMINER Ramac, Inc. CU-062-85 January 10, 1986 Page 5 TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of January, 1986 to the parties of record: Merritt Nielson Nielson & Smith, Architects Box 1062 Mercer Island, Wa. 98040 Randy Rockhill 141 Capri Avenue N.E. Renton, Wa. 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of January, 1986 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Jim Matthew, Fire Marshal Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before January 24, 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. Irmo,' mow a aids. ponies war ta.•• 10, 02• 4 oar7 -.,,.. w• i t` in..',_, ir....„ . _. L., ........, ,.,.....„.- slaw I. 444.. Maass. Maio.- 1 jvr Wire) ., c71 AI ED: rO Sm- lz 7 it ''' V N 5• 14C, lin... 6nft, CepAla OIL tame= we L....•,..,. a it—— — — i aNu IN; S,(`",, vs of Y, 1' T' 10N j I Mao ver.... new.••.$-------.„ N! law,.. eamerwt, au.. row. soma, t WEST EL VA70N7\ wows- vwwir) arwws did 1 NI _ ., ... 1 all 1111 ----- 11 MINIIIIH' - 11111 6 ------- , g5,_ 1 J.' —= eUlLyING, = G' nON 0,:,-, Ns. one• 7. 77••••••• Pall-, tin vmen. asas---. 1 Y,, L. '"- ram+ a`. Evr. TIor+ a..n- t ' d I erwcs ss.. A r I t- ti ! N i pn w. ss, s r mwa, w.•. r ore.. Grcrer. or : sc -: Mr G V+..: rolr.• ue: TeW 0•••••••• • i d il \ Itio) ywon, unt• MP MR Yb+ OK. Grp II utJMwa is, wy. rw_ M) p uArp I_ p urf lac Vi= 10.E TOW.* w NIP MO.. r 2AR% f r Wr rXsT Re• M M- arr1R• Y.• Wo1I1wW r+ r a' O nr. rvnTYti-} J •' . JOa 1 r I I 'fi /17.' t i 7y A2 r I...., ::1, .4".11- 1.•.,..,..,!,, 1Irn S ,.), . . .j,r.. •. .. • I ,_•f :•'1, 4 1r' - -L fir;I Tr i I SJ • o • `.C1)i C.)e ms.:-•• itif,i_ii„_./i iiit iii"'1 77•-?-, n. T.... •- ..\ t e ,et' .e r I; sly gt,el, Bi G— R-4 a 811 /„ r 5 :r. : 1>[7i'ii 'i, '.. L-1 ' 0%;1 , }. R-4 L- 1 ion Q, J , w .... 1 R— dada J J.--- ': . i ." . /%4.?1( ,,''l' ) • 1\ -r--' ' i' ILf8Farr l/ ;;/ 1 sue,- .• `'4, 0 //.Y' li 'a M OL1`f7 I 1 , l %,' Z. : 4 sir a CfMl.•. P, PARK Sop G- 1 a. R. 1,0 INS-P G_1 B-.t- 1 , R_2 RAMAC, INCORPORATED CU-062-85 APPLICANT RAMAC, INCORPORATED (NIELSON & SMITH)TOTAL AREA _ 1.67 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY EXISTING ZONING B-1, BUSINESS USE EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY PROPOSED USE SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMERCIAL COMMENTS s r 1 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of King DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 10th day of January 198b, affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /O IH- day of D I NJ 1985. Notary Public in and fqr the State of Washington, residing at -1C)e11/77J/'J therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: CU-062-85 - RAMAC, INC. (Nielson & Smith) The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) OF RE, Z DTIcEo a 9,0 o94rfp SEP1E0„ City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON DFCFf1RFR 31 . 1q85 BEGINNING AT 9.00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: CU-062-85 I 1 REZONE From To x SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ONF AND NO STORY SELF STOW BLDG. SITE APPROVAL I SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lots. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS : LOCATED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.E. (EAST OF I-405 AND NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HY.) LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION SIGNIFICANT ( NON-SIGNIFICANT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOU" PROPER AUTHORIZATION Cu O6Z-85 OF J Q z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENTt$ RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z o 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0 P- 1 SEPSE BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH N AYOR MEMORANDUM DA i E: December 24, 1985 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: RAMAC, INC., CONDITIONAL USE/CU-062-85 Rarnac, Inc.'s conditional use application was originally scheduled for public hearing on September 17, 1985. However, the applicant asked reconsideration of the Environmental Review Committee's recommended condition on access as outlined in a letter to the Examiner of August 9, 1985. The Committee accepted the reconsideration request and reviewed information submitted by the applicant. As a result, the Committee revised its recommendation as stated in a memo to the Examiner dated December 9, 1985. The revised recommendation contained two conditions, one dealing with the controlled access question and the other on traffic circulation. Both conditions are suggested as a means of controlling public traffic from using private access to circumvent traffic controls upon public streets. As the first condition, the Environmental Review Committee approved controlled access through the site by requiring the construction of a full width electric powered gate at either the southern boundary of the self-service storage warehouse or the northern boundary. They felt the decision on the actual location of the gate was a site plan issue to be determined under the conditional use permit review process. As long as there is a controlled access point, the environmental issues of pass-through traffic was addressed. Therefore, the Hearing Examiner should be looking specifically at the location of the full width electric powered gate. The Committee also required the construction of traffic channelization at the intersection of N.E. Third Street and Bronson Way. The purpose of channelization is to actually create a traffic triangle and limit traffic to right turns and to specifically prohibit left turn traffic movements. The staff recommendation has not changed from its original position as stated in the preliminary report to the Hearing Examiner dated September 17, 1985. Staff believes the proposal is appropriate and in fact a compatible use for the subject site. Therefore, the staff report of September 17, 1985 would stand as written. RJB:ss 2121Z 209E3Z_ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL_ BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON DECEMBER 31, 1985, AT 9:0C A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION: RAMAC, INCORPORATED Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a one and two story self-storage building having 30,850 square feet of area to be located in a B-1 zoned district (file CU-062-85); located at the 100 block of Bronson Way N.E. (east of I-405 and north of Maple Valley Highway). Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL. INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE: PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 31, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPI\IONS. PUBLISHED : December 13, 1985 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, J=ANETTE SAMEK-MC KAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE. PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. AT1 EST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing in gN7nit..) on the n j day of December, 1985. SIGNED: jA. -C,•et OF RE4 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 09, rFD SEPS° MeP BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 13, 1985 Ramac, Inc. P. D. Box 653 Renton, Washington 98057 Re: Conditional Use Application for a Self-Storage Building, File CU-062-85; Property Located at the 100 Block of Bronson Way N.E. (East of I-405 and North of Maple Valley Highway) Gentlemen: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on August 8, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hea ring. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJE3:JMM:ss 21057_.1 cc: Merritt Nielson OF 6 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR ZNAL o 09 co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O9 P F0 SEPSE BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 13, 1985 Merritt Nielson Nielson & Smith, Architect & Planners Mercer Island, Washington 98040 Re. Conditional Use Application for a Self-Storage Building, File CU-062-85; Property Located at the 100 Block of Bronson Way N.E. (East of I-405 and North of Maple Valley Highway) Dear Mr. Nielson: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on August 8, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hez.ring. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, eLark C14_ Royer J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:ss 2105Z.2 cc: Ramac, Inc. 011 RF^ 4.BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENTt$z z o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235 -2540 09-q S E PI c P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: December 9, 1985 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: RAMAC, INC./ECF-095-85/RECONSIDERATION REQUEST The Environmental Review Committee has analyzed the reconsideration request submitted by Mr. Dan Shane of Ramac, Inc. The Environmental Review Committee finds that their original decision was appropriate; however, there is an alternative which is acceptable and the Hearing Examiner could consider in his deliberations as an environmental equal. Therefore, the Environmental Review Committee, under its substitive authority [Section 4-2822(D)] recommends to the decision maker, the Hearing Examiner, that the conditional use permit request to allow the construction of a one and two story self-service storage building having 30,850 square feet of area to be located in the B-I Business Use zoning district is subject to the following conditions: 1. The construction of traffic channelization at the intersection of N.E. Third Street and Bronson Way. This channelization shall limit westbound left turns from Bronson Way to N.E. Third Street and southbound left turns from N.E. Third Street to Bronson Way. 2. Controlled access through the site shall be limited by the construction of a full width electric powered gate at either the southern boundary of the self-service storage warehouse site or the northern boundary. The primary objective is to stop public traffic from using private access to circumvent traffic controls upon public streets. Under Section 4-2822(D), the decision maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ultimate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision maker then has the option of asking the Environmental Review Committee for reconsideration or revising the specific conditions. Fred J. Kaufman December 9, 1985 Page 2 The applicant has the ability to request reconsideration of these conditions from the Environmental Review Committee or appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authority granted in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within 14 days of the date that the DNS is final. Therefore, the appeal date would be Monday, December 23, 1985, at 5 p.m. Appeals must be submitted in the form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-3011(B). RJB:ss 2093Z cc: Mr. Dan Shane Ramac, Inc. P. O. Box 653 Renton, Washington 98057 OF R4, 4 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT zeel RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR 0 co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0, 9gt O SEPTE P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 1985 TO: BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICY DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT DESIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION UTILITY ENGINEERING DIVISION FROM: BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: RAMAC, INC. SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING FILE # ECF-095-85, CU-062-85 Please find attached, a revision for the above referenced project showing a proposed through traffic control system to be installed across the driveway of the project. This project will be rescheduled for the ERC meeting of December 4, 1985. Please comment on this sheet and return to this office prior to the meeting time. 12.1 I I W 10) OF R4,1 To ;DEC 21985 7. BUILDING & ZONIN6-MENfT. o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR O ..MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON f 98055 • 235-2540 9 co- 0, 9gT P Ep SEPTA BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM rDEC. 2 DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 1985 TO: BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICY DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT DESIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION UTILITY ENGINEERING DIVISION FROM: BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: RAMAC, INC. SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING FILE # ECF-095-85, CU-062-85 Please find attached, a revision for the above referenced project showing a proposed through traffic control system to be installed across the driveway of the project. This project will be rescheduled for the ERC meeting of December 4, 1985. Please comment on this sheet and return to this office prior to the meeting time. GAT.e- I )I1 T izzEQU'Q.EO 2o' co . 2.Ps y EL.E(- 120 t.) . seoUgATy sy sT€I.•I \.,aJ L h \4>t..) I EQ Uf\P.O MO•3 0 P L- o J E a.% O'er •O2 -g 2 6 roc. plod TeeciQkS'‘ Ot'J, 3. L.C.C.Ess -ro FIrtE use 1 •couICZ6 b2 1.1bQtAt.1k., S tJes s L.c.Cr1 v)I T I ES or A E tZ rt N L J •F-1-1.e ft. u G ) a s 'DIMEUE Co - N So ii A- 't s eCccS S ae- J j kuN1-kU2d-c>-2oclSJ p . Q 12,-Z.- gc- 0,:4%).1'•-:);1-4, ./.,--3171—`'Ili--::::,7-1.4VIN .-I i 1114 44r-r7 /• 'N 1 I 49iS':(463- k i 4.• 1._.' I N ( I 1 t f , 9tr CM 0.94-1•-..., 7 1/ i C.)G"0,..i .---------- ------C>0.5tr • q.`• 7 301,. t• '.;•/// !.&:,-.' ''-'..>0 ''''41i r I, - 1 .;,,•,/j_ i s' t i t• i \ 1i I'. I , i 1 I :r-1. .......... 1..,..., r.---/ 1-7 t ‘ 1 t,,, l'..-;i... .--',;r"" -...../.7. l•••• =4G) 1 41 Ais.153-16 WA. ,INi 1"R 1 -1 11 1 , i...1-- ......1_4,.............____L..1.___________i _ i tt i r.. i I , i I i i c- : 1 r I •• * _) I r• a 1 L. I,t, i di_..,„ 1 rc. i p- , c3. , 1,1I ; ' ti i• '', — 1r.k t "' •. • '\ i i i 1- '• 4).-Nitr2;„..-..-4..v.••;:.7i't,,..:,„.:.,—'1;,!..• ,• - -:,,•,, .f.,-•...,C.T: Tir.r. ' '4,10.f.,,:-,..,-..7.:,..;,, ..,i1 > ,, „. . .....4,-4. 4;37,,..--.., _,.... 'i.ii: -;•••••:*.&' '. .•57,::,74;4?-‘.1.i ivt,••>#.) ire •-•/5*.'• Nkie.„ 1" ' i a t, , ,;,:,,,,- x' V•1?; e.'•.. ..`••••4:.`••- 1, / ' `. -4.' ri i. , 1.• 1 . .. .i r-- - - 1 1: ‘..)., I ill I, • 0.,, r,t, 4 ,..',4. I t ',.., .',-,- 7 -001-'4 i,,.i. TA••••• " 0:in fr k' ii' s...: :, .. :.,,r1:,..,,.. : 1 k‘ , , vo, 1 , v.,,, ,- :..1 - '4,:p., tAr.1 ; .,: 1:',i ' f. - i 1> *•• y1.1 4 g , : , :2;.?.! i';'••• • ', : ..11 .V. Ir _. r'...•,:i . i••:- . , i,I i•-•:-' e. F 1::::::•;.; 1,'1 ‘,....v.' , t• :, , , . ' .A.4.. - ic) it; • 4( I .1,- -. I i,. 4' V: •,..., , .Y• .,":',' ' 1erts4.• -.•, . A .it- • j v, ! - -• 6.„,,.. k-.:, i'* . c:-.••, • i ic ,,.. k_ , ,‘,4! - • ,,..•• -.1„. 1,• . i i• -.1.,,Nr....-• •••••,:- •• . 7- 4.-.-it ..1 I ,,., wt..* 11 ..:„F••• 07,i . t•.i 1 I s i4 '. i I..*""IC it it yi .. fAlkyi.X.. : i.r>,.... , o • 1••• , 5, I 1 i 1.4,"%..V.:4' 1. .1 • . 1,4.ii ,-. ,1 . ./, , s. 1.4 -... t,t,pii. ',-.....5,.';.):°: ..: ..... 4..„..=: .. ' : A. *.11 k44,,,-,, P. 1,I f 1''',i 1;''' 1.:. ...., . 44, • 4'••;=. 0,71.4' 1 Iv,.'' ..,$f . .. 4•5,.. • 1..-4 -•or it v• i.". 4:";'''''.'''s'.. i•- . i,"'?..c.'jik",..i, .• 0 ,„ 4:::,. " 1 it, •..14 - ..t,'':•3.•. . I.,,,,, 1 I.... , • , -,v....,.$.;.I 5t,',. 7• 4. Ii Iti.,-,.• 2.. s\. , .... i.,,,.. r 4,',. i.:i ",./•.4* s8.' 4.! ... i. t4.?•"'. A.." 4,,,...,, • i! t„. 1,0::t,•1, I . 4 1,f,...,,,:•:„. v.,.; t.r.,:.. it- f •',Al!",.i", ,..., 4: tr.-1:1',Trv-,.-. - :.. ' 10/.C3 ?/./S-1/02 • :. )/(it7 N/01)) 'S'S.9770e12/1,•.2 CP2P-iPtgOV M "4"1"16 • •o... ge .t.,.._ N-L0/11Ai S0fi'V ' az967)14Y29Ve.t26/0 d3'770a4tY82 4V,'•.*1 3. . ‘'...-..:4„,,A, ectz7 ogy-e.Av at2 GVW eiN..1 t•-•• r ••...• • :•••-...•P- Y,OW73U1-ilifri 9/1/41/7Saflanijoi--qaa3371 ----1 . / . t% . ,..‘.'"7*...... N.A / illr'••••'.. •••1"... ''.4, t'• A 1•* 7."..4..,••• ....47.: 4 t•• T-,-z•-r-m-Y.,=.4•7=.:-:-.•-..••=.7.-, 1-.',------,-=•-7-.7—'4:4--,' 4 '--7, - ' cris... c7 2.1.,....,( .- 4 ;.4 .4.- e '''.• . Ni,•; ,14......; tt•..','':i,;'i.P.,, N,F2'.1_,',.. .,-,,,„.:•.:- , ..,, ..,, . •,-,;-.--,7,,i.•;;;; ' , N b•4 ' F. 1,•:''••t''' 0'1.1 4, N.,-. ...,. • I C-1-,...,. •-1.';:: •z.. ca? 4•• % ••••...... • T \ s "...... -.., s4- S-'.... . 7...4,_.04A;' 1.. Fz,-, — .7 A ky \- N.' s''\.. A''''.'"---.,,.......,‘....,....., A•.... , i 41 veiPit 9.7isi ' -.7.,,;;;;-- -11~t2tIVA.Si-rvt"*....1.... -'',,4i:114; 7-• '.4"... i.-I A.A.-.•••1., i• "7...I 1••••• •-=• 1 _a- .....'ert•-•"on -....t^ #.1."1/T.--.-.. 4... 4' 1. 1 I I 1 t ; I 4 . r• illc i ti‘ I . Vt: 7. ''' ' 1 s :.•7---• la . '' I 11> V ,..._;,' i 1 47 r\ _ i Is, J I. ii, ill g 141/,„., ,.:. I,_ I•;---- Ka - N.. 1 I 1,--<. f N il',... i:.- i ;..-: 11.. A V :-: o i, V. \ --• t•••• 1\ r 1.: '- Q 1• r:4 . 6. ira • g ,-. u, il 4 ' . p 1 I k N- r, k ,...\ T. Iiiate,,, 35. 7a- 1 i 7 4; I N ' . I ! i ' lb ' •*.... Z r 0 0.-- k ,.. f-- ............. ''' 17---- lir; s'• c s--. . / I. • .... Z C.... t 1 .•....., S. 1 % 4 r_______, 4. , 11gp,_.. gra.... ,,,,, ,,,,,.,. . Ist.,..=..., ..,,...., .- .,.:.......:;..., - f ...- .- 4. Plirgi,„' w• ik. 14,--' 4, 74.:,'" k:.:• 17` 41. 4•,•....-:-:: '•% 7. 1.- - '''.*• 1 ' t - i. f 4. i._, 4 0 4-- 4 i 1 1 ` s. i ' '". ' I sittr.. . : ; 1 ' I 1.I i .). .'''. ., I' f t- 4/ t. r.,4. 1. ... !...,# i s\ 1.-- T i V k ''• -? .`-' 40-- • . .. - . . . .. i i t t. i- i .......?.). Ii, C1 41."'-''. t 11. , R i A A,-, : .. • 1; 47.... • .. 4' Zit& •; AC'i. A ; 4.. A. •- 1" P ; 1 6 1. t 7.1.:,,.•I. 1 1 7' Fi . i 1 '... T.: 1; e..... 1. V) ltiVt It..', 4* Z. -^? 1,-• - '''''.. . 1.. 7"..' . V? a . i. i r,S.... 1 7. ". r `::-, 4 I : i 7,.. .....--.,,,••• •-- -., .. J".„ ...,.., , Y.--;:-).--,,,-;*/*)*,„.- ova_ I 1 ii ci '. I z.„.;;, I fF ti i 4.,-.....'..?-044 -' 2)--. 4 I. , • w` - V.' ..:,: i"?... 7'-;'; -'-••-"*" e k;'••••• 4.; TV.:/'..::-- it.-.:,..• KE- 4, 44., v1; 71. t., ... Log- : 4, 4%,,,,, z, 4.. c,,,...„ 4S,..- 7.,' '.......- 1.'' l'''' 7-.- 1' 1'_%. 17. 7"- 017,: 1 %.--''''' -- 17_ t 1...‘ i'.";:::'''' ciIT.' ir - 1 1 t , T\ Z... 1 t r'-'"V e It-- 4 , 4 11 1.5ii) 1 i1t i1 7t .;'. 1 •11' I 7* 1'- t ,'' ' 4 - a. a.. c..:- • : A' , • . 1." 1161, 0:.. 1, 0%.•-,•,..-:" *-. 44 ! ti 1 4 ' I I ' I t t 14) 1 1 Li•:.. t A:.• 0me 1..,' if . • . N.4.....;.. ... z,,. .! , ....„..,:‘,.,.,..... wv,..., 4,.. 4,,,,• ir.... 1....:. :,.,. . ,.. -"" o.,•-. •'• / 47.:' , . 4y. A-*-.• 1- • 1---------) o- ) • 411, tii•) erkpajt. -...- -.) .-••' : ., ', 4, 16--:'''' r• sit*. i. i-•: k. -*--.): i- A, 14- 4.-- K.'".."?.-" fgro,-. 4. 1--. ts- n. . k._, o.. ., : t• d_ t' s• -,... 4,,-.,_• te.;.• _ „.•'• i • 1 4-..':,::,,., sk, 40. k. 7,•••• 4- 06- "... 1. 7, A1 - . A. c4b4- A,`"-- 4- •; k-, - Alio.. . ,,.-,, i; , :. _ . j--, tr t. . . : ,., , _ ,_-.., __, ,. ...‘. : • t_ Li - ----) t, 1 i I 1 I 1 .1 11 1.• ' 1- t. '411 ' I) I I 1 i I 4...,--:... c.,•„,„ T„---# r- . .-. ••••. ... t -,., ett.,.•••: v Att, ,,,,---,-, - r1r,•'- rog3. 4 ..,..... t.„,•••.• e- ...- - ',- .. 4 f , , 0,, ,..-. -. , r : '- •-, - "", ' 4, 1k / Zi.` ,,;;.% ." • ..;. ,/ ‘ . ' ",. '- ' s- 1,, .-- • I7 tor.• i t, . .' r.- VI: f'" 4. '• 7 , . d• ' t . 7 - 7, 141.. '' 7 "- ' , V ti. 1 . 1 i i e1I. ..* .. A . .....,,,,„......„, .,- ,.., tilt. i . i. _ ___, i 1 I t • i 1 A / / , v, A. r e r i • i 1 f - vit i/ 4'• 1P 4. ',/ r.. Nr- ts • f•-••• kr v • 40 . e,.... I -•-• s.. zc...... s.......„ cs..............„.......„........... 4'''' -'•• ti 7..;` 4. 4- tr -"•'- g'-'''' i- 34:.--:. YA.,-.::-,'"' 4.,, ol. " 1-'' -''.‘- I.:". 4:::'' s •,.=:- X.. 4"'•,- 1g: 1*.", ,-:-• • o• x w-,.. fi.-• :-.);-. N- a.'',: ti• ct. a- ''''-• 04, ErkiP.$,:,, 71•_ 4.'- .. .. - 4-,', 4 11*, A 01 Ye.'''' ken'- Ar 4. ir...--v...I. . 01 •''.: LIil7 1•• • • it,eil 1,--"—:---...=: 41- all. ,.. a... cv. . 1t4V1 --- - 2; - . V6t Q-- 41e-- .„ . e..•“'..-••••- CO; Lac.. T r Of qt . ad fr. V* 4 7 r .. . i..,, f r„{ fL G}i.!v +ti ''Y 'wry t!' t` j V v may. OP-CALDR LIr t-iG/l.460 ON u t r n J1G/i 1" 1"P1t'1 iG KG12i.f" ' .e,... :••••.:,„t;" 47: i..114i41,.....r ....,. a ..-. .\‘';`•\. 40 2 er.....,N\ f: ft R , i % 1"11,f a.assr->__ :•-:s*a+mr•:.v,a.ue - IC fit,. 1".-.46''''..;1:-.:;1'•::, 1 -i 7 e , t.ilit,'!' t;:7.".:;"..—. 4„.. Q i 1 a2 P1 WEIrFOSz/A G WtWet-E-67lrox/ z4• f 4q; : 4'ff,+ f.+r+•• *. C if ive/ppeystoRil it 46 4 h ///d--CI . . r + ar. i IL 11 wp /Y p (a/NA/um(y/%/ vcI Y,+•'1{! 0 w •iY x gr } K' 1 .t., '''',•,r4)--tit'S' 4,-1 ' I ' 'Y ' i., r 11 44, j, 4-4jr, ;'-1` e is aF• \\ 4 rt 4y ) S••O S:ii • '' •y'1i', c y1 r f s • t isk fir 1 p./ }1s r.. A- L A t e rr a v_. itt; mot K i ..• wi \...\..., )0... , ,): "'; 1 ?i1Q,• n y 3p4. R f4. S i .. rJ 5,i+/ r3+°h Y i F y,{- ....• c s% i:. r 1 yy l. r ;•• it . r 1 -1" i JI I it >: f • y',.'"+ i} •r. • i, i r i 4. a Q Adb• i44 ; i.' t ':f.' Sr i I . , , „ , , r.y..$ , , f::".: 'It; 4''',7!A..":,1 • r.:„.,, f- s s a 4,• -i y ti- r. } 4 * le.(e, y. 4. 4 y St P "Y. i t •ft : .r.'t t. to p f i"yE` a't i c "1 ?, in k•, 111;,... 7, 1 k;•• 5'.4;'•",1,.'.' •11"X•"+$[ •' .tremita ..+'°t• Y+ " iti....i c ::,•4 ti`' a :> 4 ,12; f i,' k ;1li 1 7., 7:::‘ • • ,. r:.._. 1 11 t A Ia. I I'Z 'T. tteglify0144'4(r:"F‘LP/44 V i :,- Kir. —,-- Tit i•wY 0tt i U 1 i Yy !T} ZS t I KtI Y CoUr Y, VJ/5H, Ai Ott{ 15a0rlt r 1• 93} i.y Ti`',r •. t' c } n s • kt Y +' 4t+ • a i r t i t 1 y1 S . r t , 5 t y•7 a 4 r.,it r '. h. 1,tx N. 4 2$ E' is ty z9 r r OF R 416 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT u Z Z o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09gt 0 SE0°.° P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: NOVEMBEROV 27, 1985 TO:1BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICY DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT DESIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION UTILITY ENGINEERING DIVISION FROM: BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: RAMAC, INC. SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING FILE # ECF-095-85, CU-062-85 Please find attached, a revision for the above referenced project showing a proposed through traffic control system to be installed across the driveway of the project. This project will be rescheduled for the ERC meeting of December 4, 1985. Please comment on this sheet and return to this office prior to the meeting time. ea) C(l/L4- 048 , 6470/iuJo41 / eo,v4/667— W 3 lJL aov 5 C- Su437 /7- - , 12,V N( r*' r £a'1.1114(7, Af- z1_,:- 4' 2' At'-4 ; -.Ti Af.AN% .<17-4oF KA•keir 7.* 0 A, i/ ; fir ,..,,... 4Nix,"•;:-:•-•„,. . I,- ir;. 4, ,..,•-•.,•-.- bit', • 4:,•:' 0, r -, P„Ii. .i..... • 19Cr.;69 . - 1-,e, y;•••....„•?'' l') i 207 00 i I C) . 4.44-4' 1 J • 1.•:?• 1,' (-) ,- , 1 / 1iI.•i 1i• -!, 5, , • -- 4. 4-.!4.. '--.-.. ...... '- 4 .-.. .* - • ,.• •.. ..., - Z...- .:. . _• _•;, •..., /-• .te:'....., '-• .- I. : ,,_.. 4,.•. s......;.,..4.;,1:.-..• 4-• ,— 4..7P i / i I//'/.1 •', V.. 1• 1 •J 4:- .,,_:' , - . . '.. --- -•.,_, .... 7.,,,.....'...,,A*,-1,'„7,''''' ".-- is-i - ' , At ' s- - 7-1•.`-', "s•- ••"...i-,-,,:•. • - :-• '• - " ' . N 4 I !.;tir . ,-*4' '-'' -' :-.::7-'' As:,'-'..- .....' . -;,- - -,.... V4Rw' i•. It': I . . 1 1 , - : .', ....:..t.zt,:. ., -..,,.list•-1;.6r.. ,,,,. ,,.;:,;.,-•;,,,,"• -:4.1...-• . .'74... ;AY-'. ::•!!'..-.1s,1,14%',37',!,t'31t1';,. ' t t 1 i 1 ,, i .. • • - .....,.- •=, 1.,,,r_41".... - 9.5...-:?'". -4.4,.„.. ---,411„,,,,,,s-,-,.. ,;:-:_i: ,,,,,,34.„4,- 4.- / f i 4:-,.., ,-- -.-..„,.-1 -7 --,. .:-.. ,: ... ,-:,.... -7-, iv.-...47. . ft,. ' i i . K. !. , . ---. "-' • I c..., 4 1 1 r 14- 4 4 Atto:,: .. .s ,.::'.. : :.: 44. re.....:::$:7.'' .,,,:•'.'-,.:,. . ii:, ....; ".'...i. t:10,;;;:i..7...,..1::.•:i...;::'.', - _ 0,*.P• --",,r_______i la i2113 .,,..".Z4,14:1=t1ZVI. . ef414• ,4444fOleftatjaangengri— I : ts...,t41 . s:,/ AT:,.. 1 . ••=,---i [1, 1 !I -Pfl, 4 ' 1.i 1 it 1 i i I i I i. , 41::"4'-'•'"1.-4'. ' -"; .X.•,'.'''' v•„!.s. ..'" ..-,.w..4•,..st•ti::•0*, t-..g..--. ,..,.,-.;;;:,44 -. --..,--,-- --_- :.114,..*.w,..4...- ...::''.'--...:-• ....-i-r.-'4:-. 4...t. _........, .., 1 el'4,• j 1 lel—, i i * t • Aw e-- iv 4,----, -..., --....,.4„:..---,..,,,,,,,4„, --..-:„, . . .., , • ..,..-„,...,.....„..,„..;< Z4‘,.:, .44,4':;444.15*.'':-f- •e'' :447"4:!-',...17.,:.:': r2'.\1 1 ':, 1 C I-4- • v447,: i...-. 4- Z:•4°..--• i j4-. 1, : . -. ':.f4k 4••," t!. Tt I I 1 i V i • 1 I, — • tek.- -•••'-7'.,..Z.N.;..,;‘,1.!;..,..71''...." :0.. ,47.'ret•-••••••'„%i.' 0 104.10'. : 40'......-;- ..,-S.-, .417:'.'4.,-,:t'',=••.Ilt*'-I..:,.3i..,..'.'"':At 4,,, I I21- i ' i 1 i r-• 0 1,.. 07 7:,--' 7.f. '', ev.1:'.7* -•'' :;-.... ..': '..:,-.Wil-4T;A. f.,;,r,i5.1.,.Jrf" •ii17? Az,.,1,0,t. -.'. 4,, ..,. 4.4 , 3:-.Al:''.-„1• 21:1...:-.5,141:imir44.!: r...,,,••••:-.:- • / .••1 1 i:. ,, l , c> . .,04 ' z.. 045:,. . t.< ... 4 1;,..... 11. priAA., ‘,. 4, t i. Ts. 4t,,. - i,...i4.-.4" / i;,...;,;-........;44,-,.-.-,-,---4,,2.,,,..-.,,,•,,,..;.•.:'•: , ;:::';',:'..;(1,,i4.F‘a,-1.14:reNk . i.4. // ci c-vt ci""••-b • ,.. DEC 2 1985 I.- T. ; AirIII" ,nc , . 1,1 . Iv.= 4-- I C rALA-' 4:;.-..q.z:,./...•;•.:-.... - . - _ lc.-- 0 • . , t,.(,_JCITY OF RENTON7 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. i 1 I C=—_____7' .1-4-..Fr or-Pz..i.:z:___tv,..-1:4zi_.,t 154 C-Mfar' i i 1.11 i C 1 t Ni„, I ••.‘3 •c • 7 i 4 ti 4 rttm. 4fi CC. p 5-7'/L.-- .-'•''- :...4-1•-• '',"' 1 1 r IP II . ..L ill -4 I fricl's . .;( li 1411 1.• "K set 'i -1. t/ In' -VI 72 Ii 1 * 10 lo. 10 r° i k 1 kl I r-11 OF R4, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z o 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-254 0 9itEO SEPS e P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 1985 CITY OF RENTO1 -- BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT v POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU DEC 3 1985 POLICY DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. ISIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION UTILITY ENGINEERING DIVISION 6N BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 43 SUBJECT: RAMAC, INC. SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING FILE # ECF-095-85, CU-062-85 Please find attached, a revision for the above referenced project showing a proposed through traffic control system to be installed across the driveway of the project. This project will be rescheduled for the ERC meeting of December 4, 1985. Please comment on this sheet and return to this office prior to the meeting time. 04•''t$* Af-4- aAAL`r)"6Ye OpideA.A.4, wei ff" (Fwaue•tee rem,. ed,WV:,,Pn c#20, toe4A-49---1-,4 e4t-t%-- P%"- -11-tew%Ln re/S4,15:ea A rt, 19,4, i•VL_ 11416(71Z— n/zip 14/2,1,43 ti fe t•-k ' ... 1-4oF ! AMP X-.. F _1 fir I.''•4'.-•. 4/ f.- A1 0,..... i ‘.• 0 1417 -i--. - i,• 4 .,, Y,. "'•; i• •1 14/s. I •-•',(.' 4-IA •7 , i 2ot e 19G49. 7 .1.74,;• .co' ,'i. ! r) c•-4 i / 1, ,"' ; 1'_*'41' IP /.. /t"1 1r 4..' ':'" -111 I :"./4/ / 1 1s- c7-4:,..Z..1zir"".."-C.: 4 -',....., t,;;;;;:.--.;.-i".-- ,' - .""-,- .4r.r ---i-.c',`•t' 1-",'-v•-.' ";X,:i,.•;-:•-. '.%_ .. 4:-.:- ..- '1_ „, . ',.:(-3?.-- .".. "Llga....v. iisAr.rmAviiii;;-*-5,-, '4 ,4?..t3;',_._.&.,.. .P :if"i4::-" •, 4. , *.-.,:-1,0,3f2.....,„- --_.,_47i JD j/ ui , t':-..;- 11,v 6: v ,,, / o:, le: " i ' e •8 ,1, 1,-. f ,.i 1 i 1 • i.- ai• ` * ., • '''.-- 77 '''t- ' z? Ift.';'1.1'-1,..17.",11:.•4*:"441V1-11(.:b*ik1.1.k...4 —414,7,- .'''. - . • . t44, .,.t'.: ; 4. ,....,.. .r.g- •-• .. 4.i f 1 t I k. tr.4,::, ••;,Ii.-...-2--- -• tt----, .;;,.w';,'-';);iioA:...4-.; -14- .'.- - 4,‹etoe- s ttii:4V: ' ' -.. '''iLA 117t.,..i.•.:ce.z...:Q, ti•'4•!•7. ":* , i1 I 41 i - -. I '. i r-l• lL_. , r...O.' s‘Y:',. 111'•- -•4...14.'r.V,,.fl 4-..,,,,,,- 4 9.k. :4,.•.4* ii, ,'.4.:-A,:•- i 1 :- ' sy c-...04 a le. , z V.:I 4 i i A1i , 741 I' 1 i-- (..1.?,. 1 1 M11. 4..:3!.k.." ) 4,. tel 4 x,.,4:2,.: .,-.4,. .,, ,.!;:.; . ''' :- t4-- 1 v. l , 4h...-' 44'.. ,,.*'•''' -,f,:i,^ 4:',,,7, 7,,,lik' e.,;;;;. 1;,,:, 004 '1,1'.'` ., 9•- 7.-,,,".*",:-..,.*:: k*-7.' t, , .itilf-'.111A191.'th ..".4,-.:.141,---,. :.4-4••:".4.... ..:1:',Z=Ke'f'. ,-.:':','-'..3%._:,',.'7•'..-':-. 1 1 7 lir ; 71. ,1 I • t ; _- ••gA, r* 1.:p;- ,.-1 7 i f Tt i i m,,.: e- wip.whovii, 1."' .. ,./._ ri :• . A. . 1. i IIIIi A6'4!.•', Pp 1 i : 04:1 w4 6- , - 4.. --.. .--,xt. .4M:fre• 75 : MN.tkr .:t. ' 1•‘' V:...4.':. • / /41.1 c.) Y k' i • t., i rcf,C-- t:a)'11 A' r. 11 r,is I ' i i ..ow,- 1 i 1*i . .74. ,-•_..•-, .,._ . .7:1'r:f *1+1;:k4'4:$4.V.21;; I 1.,rd 4 i 1 C7) 4 44 41 4 -: 4_1..., ...' ..-171.1'...:. .-.. ,:-',':,...- 14 .;• .t.e.,4:.- 4.. 1, / 1 ,V ,, 4 1 I g. . i. li...:vii-'..7- - 71-' C 4-,.FT:-1..) ::'__VIA 71-.1ti-"•-lE 15%SOMENT-."' C.=..". ..N i .. c,% . •••i 1p!,4 pc, a f t,_,:,7. PA•i'.•,7 qt__..11/ I1\ t-.- 14 ' RC I. li ij . I I ' 1 -- S.-- I/ 11 •K 1, i k t0; I, t. - UT. IV _ to,. i v- i.• 1If lj11.ii1 I 1•.• IA 1 i OF R4, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENTc) o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 0 94 o SEPS O P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 1985 CITY OF RENTON TO:BUUI LDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT I-POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT UEC 2 1985 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICY POLICY DEPARTMENT np,r,OPMormT nwPr PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT DESIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION UTILITY ENGINEERING DIVISION FROM: BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: RAMAC, INC. SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING FILE # ECF-095-85, CU-062-85 Please find attached, a revision for the above referenced project showing a proposed through traffic control system to be installed across the driveway of the project. This project will be rescheduled for the ERC meeting of December 4, 1985. Please comment on this sheet and return to this office prior to the meeting time. j_e,a0P/Z/(/6 A.kri.4-c-fryN' Gr-e-e41-116". dtel'in ie-ocerai 021 3/ pcx-,u4 CITY OF RENTOO i 11W1D MEMORANDUM DEC 21985 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT DATE: December 2, 1985 TO: Environmental Review Committee FROM: Traffic Engineering SUBJECT: RAMAC, INC. SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING FILE #ECF-095-85, CU-062-85 Please be advised we have no concerns for the use of an electric- powered sliding gate as proposed on the above-referenced project. CEM:ad 21;ltdcd OF R ,' 1/ C'r ® z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Z o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09„ a<<- BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM Nr l J I TRAFFIC Er:G.DN. JDATE: NOVEMBER 27, 1985 B UWIE TO: BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICY DEPARTMENT DEC 2 1985 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT SIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION4SIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION UTILITY ENGINEERING DIVISION FROM: BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: RAMAC, INC. SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING FILE # ECF-095-85, CU-062-85 Please find attached, a revision for the above referenced project showing a proposed through traffic control system to be installed across the driveway of the project. This project will be rescheduled for the ERC meeting of December 4, 1985. Please comment on this sheet and return to this office prior to the meeting time. i• CITY OF RENTON 1. ti • OFR , r o 4, 11 DEC 21985 z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT UILDING/ZONING DEN. z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 co- 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 235-25 0 114)- SEPSE O P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 1985 TO: BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ILICE DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT DESIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION UTILITY ENGINEERING DIVISION FROM: BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: RAMAC, INC. SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING FILE # ECF-095-85, CU-062-85 Please find attached, a revision for the above referenced project showing a proposed through traffic control system to be installed across the driveway of the project. This project will be rescheduled for the ERC meeting of December 4, 1985. Please comment on this sheet and return to this office prior to the meeting time. Ge(fe./e,": I 2-oPS Pot.Ac.>:. 11Ye - 4,--,..:-.. Sp 1, iit, 1!,,,,,...: .. 4:?. 4...:„.. ... . 1_. v..... 1?„ 1,.." .;.,.,:;.., 1- 3-' i. k47::‘: e.. i." 1- 7 :. k . i-;:_..,,,., 1/ 6: 17 .-;.-' 7. 4...-...,„,.. 1. t.'- vii: c': 4,, i • i Is— i. 4 Cl..., ..--- ca i P- -', T:-. T- r • C'.,-,---- .... A? t. 4Lr' C A11 -. 7! Siitir'-'- ---- 4 5,. 0 . 1, i ii. v.; , : , •,• ,.. ._..-, , . , ...., : ,.•. . . . 1.- ittektiolttvet-,- 7.,-- : Ai 1•;-> r."-.......... tior-- .,..,...'• - l i -. / 7 4, 7• ( 0/ • / c.-. z.,:•••..-:, `',. t? c,...?/!--....„:".---,',.......,,-, ,.. ,,.;-.- „ 4' :. ,_,,,-... ic. r ,,,: .... 71,,,-,,: 11; 7.::-•;-:- ir,.. i. g....: 491404*, 44-..,: f.•_ 1: 4,.,• ., , Ix1 , f-' 1 . ' 1,, 1. Y.: 1'1 i• Al(' ' 2' s // ' / • 1' i • 8 , 1 1 t I 1'.... 1.1.• r;"' 71.. 44 '. k::,... 6V7: 4, M,. 7 ' - I I 'I i I I' ... . i,'. rt.. t, .-. --- ' ' -- -- ' ' i - T s•. 41. „. , .. . • i i 4 l• 1 4 1 i 1 1 r„...,,,,.• 4 ,/, 4,-, - - • tgli'---- 4- ..- it- , ' 1 , I,:. ' 7*-''.. . AGAL.,......, . ' ..,.. W-,, ar, I I 17 Pl%•‘ 1 i 1 1 • : . k,,,,,., .,,' 1 - -,•,,,:,.. .. 6: fr.. . 1.. •,... A. 1.0 1 ' i I I ; 1.... 4.`,. ..- 4- 1 I I . :- t•-. It. . . . l'• ..., i . 41477.* 040%,` 07S, P3- . 1.,, r :.,.:•• r.' --- r - elk., ,., 3.-. - 10,,,,- 1..* - k" t‘ r . orC' 1 t, e•-.- it 1 4". C r I , . e.,„. 7! 4' 1.- .. -- ,#•,.?...'.. —. 4,), . i''''..* ' P.,: .-; •.....--.-;:.' ----. j...4'-, 1 1- 1 1 r_._ . f.) i. t P":• I' tik. 4 Xi.; 4;•••••-•'',' A.-'=•-•:^- __ . s r, 1-.- e•• i ; I t 7: 1 t •, c, ttt.„. 1, 4.-- tr.•$• A . I i '• `.. : 1,-..... L) - v i I trI i I 1 i P,1',,'-, 4- 4.---. 4. -•:-.:-.,: ,„,,, 77---..• 4. .. eco- 0.., ,.. .., t, . frr,„,..: 0•-;- 74, 7 :...,.,.,. .... . i. . 141:.:i ..• 1 1 p._ ,. 1 t- I 4$ '. ''.---"") 4 ._.. .. iik...* 411, i•% 0 '.'.....,-'. 1 t-.'.;*"..`, 7. '. 1' 1:.., 5.' a.' k`, k. 4;,: t1A, ct.:: , A i 4: 14 7 4.....• xr,. 4 :,-, i : o 4 I f: ibtm,e30*-- ..!•.,;•: 4 , ,,,, r''Nk' .. 7 '„,, ''. ir 24' 91, 4151r. re:??.,.,:-. 4.. I,-. ar,.- ,- I 4 ll, 1 I , Irs..:'. t c.„ Is,-.. • c r.';-'.,. f r' " i• r;* r...,!:..* Z.. . LI ... 1, c7;".?-;,. 1.,...;•• 1'',' c r. 1 1 4,11.-krt I i g,.. k.,‘1%:-. I 4 4. : 1 [ y i 1 7 ,‘ vi, de..4"" c 1. ' . ••,..; tvt••* dt- At - 1 4 74.. jiii.'.. b,,:,;.„,. f--!--.••••, 4-•....,•:':•.,`'*- A'-•. 7, 7v". ,.. z. i.._- -. 1..- 4...,;. 1 : i ; 2 s.•: ••:, t-,.., x.. ,,, t7, 071;‘,.••• pia. s- a. s:,-,..„, zwiiiii- kr 1 :.". i i 1 r". i i 6 12:ir IF, 1 : P 3-..- 4, 1,...,; 70f# i-; r.-..,..:.- / ,,, 1.." iy i 1 1---/ i W o ! 17 bc.( 1 l. i Ai 1.-... r.t.• 0 1 sI. sx. i : 1 4 1 r 1, j ti41 - 1 t. t' 0.- Vi:,( 4•..' 4,... . 1 1 i 4 i e.....,;- •,„.....-.. - 4,, e, r- 41/4„,• 4' e,,-- tAliolfe / I i 1.. .. _ .......... .. :••: .,.. -,......,..., -.,,,. • ...,.. .... V Z 4 4 i ''.'•'.:'--------) Cift,, 411 !•-,,,...„,_ L,,, 40..-.. 2. e. i-...„. s. F, , 2,.....,... sr,,, „„.._._.. .., 1 i ts,;----- --- 4 , 1.. i r— V illi•/—--- --- cs 0 4 1 7. 7 s; C7.....' N 4:- p:...,.. Y-- - E1,-,,, ‘,./•,-- 1.... i., i...... s: EA. 5c- mies., cr-"-• 7---:----- N 4 , ,,-. r 1 \ il i... s.,, ' ; C i A t M. i I , 4 ;', i, r 1 q i ss • - •, tr, kt 1. 1. 5.- nsil.-- 71,••••‘, 27 :',..•-•-•::' s T F.r, F• F"'' '..!.' 4 II1: '\ .• 4 t P-:-kri 144. ‘ j 1.• Tf. ' 1 t. • ft ' l', _ •1, 11 . NI itl 1 L. 41 1ff -VI 7:: ar, ll. 4' g 1\ ri' L i 1 ti1 .'\ \ I! t)• 11 ii 1 ' k kil f I0 t's) o.i . 1: ,,!. \ II NI:1 i fIj . 1 I :'., I t"-- 1, i. t i F 1 1111.thC.n ,„ Al 1.v0 /; lrs, ,6i= 4 w 4r4 M mercer i;,.,r;t_`- D 6 _ :Len 9,3040 j/ Od) :5;;.'s0 SUBJECT G'L 'Mitel fi J L/ j X/G'!d!J4#444.,. DATE l/ /zc-/4 -- MESSAGE 1,frAtareree.te.e/dofr,eeise4; .4-.44,164006#';140 4/e/ies.- d4OlaGw. 400-• Lirea /-SIGNED I'uyJ,' (irl s• srt REPLY CITY Ck_ r i 01't3 R E/ in re: g 14; a .. NOV 2 6 1985 SIGNED DATE / / RE5TFORM® 4S 472 SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 INTACT - POLY PAK (50 SETS) 4P472PART3WILLBERETURNEDWITHREPLY. OF R4,4 A. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Zam& rn p9 MUM MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 cp o9.1 fo SEPT, v0§' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR November 13, 1985 Mr. Dan Shane RaMac, Inc. P. O. Box 6!3 Renton, Washington 98057 RE: CONDITIONAL USE, CU-062-85/ERC RECONSIDERATION Dear Mr. Shane: The Enviror mental Review Committee has considered the traffic information submitted by your traffic and transportation engineer, Mr. Bob Parrott. Both the Traffic Engineering Department and the Environmental Review Committee generally agree with the traffic control devices that you are proposing on both Maple Valley Highway and N.E. Third Street. However, they do need a clarification as to specifically what the design and traffic lirnil:ations will be constructed to prevent shortcutting from N.E. Third Street to Maple Valle., Highway. The commit tee cannot envision a design that would totally eliminate the possibility of shortcuts. Therefore, they would request that you provide them with a specific design to accomplish what is stated in the second paragraph on page 4 of Mr. Parrott's supplemental report datec October 28, 1985. If I can be of any help in clarifying the situation, please call me directly. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:ss 2054Z CITY OF nEN T o: rid UU {1 NOV 121985 MEMORANDUM BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. DATE: November 12, 1985 TO: Environmental Review Committee FROM: Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Ramac, Inc. , Self-Service Storage/Office Complex We have reviewed the traffic analysis report of the above proposed development. The following elements are of concern and should be answered. 1. What will the access roadway physical layout look like? 2. Where will the access road tie into NE 3rd Street? As a condition of the permit, it should be noted that any changed usage of the property would require review of the right-in right-out condition. We do concur with the findings of the traffic report in regard to right-in and right-out only on NE 3rd Street to access and believe this operation would be satisfactory. The channelized left turns as proposed on Maple Valley Highway at the entrance also meet with our approval. CEM:ad OF R4,47 C) Vv © o BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT zO. RONALD G. NELSON DIRECTOR o mu. O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 9- o Pco, 91 t6D SEPZS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MEMORANDUM MAYOR TO : Gary Norris , Traffic FROM : Roger Blaylock , Zonini_ _ SUBJECT : Traffic Study - RAMAC , Inc DATE : November 11 , 1985 The information supplied by RAMAC will be brought to the ERC Committee on November 12 , 1985 . Could we please have your comments ? G.R. (BOB) PARROTT, P.E. Consulting Civil, Traffic and Transportation Engineering October 28 , 1985 City of Renton NOV 51985 Environmental Review Committee Renton City Hall EJ!'_i)iNG/ZONING DEPT. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT : Ramac, Inc. Self-Service Storage/Office Complex Gentlemen: The purpose of this letter is to supplement data submitted to the City of Renton dated 12/22/82 concerning traffic generation and turning movements relative to the proposed office complex, and data submitted 1/3/83 regarding left turn storage lane requirements on the Maple Valley Highway into the proposed site. Copies of this data are attached hereto. Vehicle trip generation data utilized in this analysis was derives from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, published in 1983 , specifically for ITE Land Use Code 710 for General Office Buildings and Land Use Code 151 for Mini-Warehouses . Copies of these published rates are also attached hereto. Discus:.ions were held with staff members of the City of Renton and W. S. DOT in order to determine existing and projected traffic volumes on both the Maple Valley Highway and N. E. Third Street. Existing average daily traffic volumes on N. E. Third 1029 Market Street Building• Suite A• Kirkland,Washington 98033•Office:(206)828-4266, Kirkland• Home:(206)488-9460, Bothell City of Renton 2- October 28 , 1985 Street amount to about 32 , 000 vehicles a day, with 15 , 300 being eastbound and 16 ,700 being westbound. Existing average daily traffic volumes on the Maple Valley Highway amount to around 23 , 300 , with approximately 11 , 800 westbound and 11, 500 eastbound. Generated vehicular trip-ends from the proposed sites are as follows : A. Mini-warehouse site (Land Use Code 151 ) . Average daily trip-ends = 86 A.M. peak hour trip-ends = 5 P.M. peak hour trip-ends = 9 B. Proposed office building A.M. peak hour trip-ends = 112 trips in; 21 trips out P.M. peak hour trip-ends = 16 trips in; 82 trips out It is c,bvious from the ITE Trip Generation data and observations make by the author, for mini-warehouse installations, throughout the Seattle metropolitian area that the impact from such installations and projects can be considered neglible. Traffic volume activity in relation to mini-warehouse installations occurs before or after peak hour volumes or occurs on weekends . From a traffic engineering standpoint, the traffic volume impacts are therefore centered around the proposed office complex. Capacity calculations have been performed and have resulted in City of Renton 3- October 28 , 1985 what appears to be a level of service "E" for ingress and egress to the proposed office complex off of the Maple Valley Highway, assuming no other access is allowed. Capacity calculation forms are attached hereto. It is proposed that access onto N. E. Third Street be restricted to a r:_ght turn in and right turn out only operation from the proposed site. Existing traffic volumes on N. E. Third Street, during the peak hours , definitely preclude any other turning movements taking place. Full access from the Maple Valley Highway, plus right in and right out only from N. E. Third Street will allow the office building and storage facility patrons access to and from the proposed site without having to cross heavy, peak hour traffic volumes . The self-service storage facility, by its very nature, will be secure and as such, the driveway around the periphery of this site can also be secured, thus preventing short-cutting of traffic from Maple Valley Highway to N. E. Third Street and vice versa. The proposed scheme would allow eastbound vehicles desiring to enter the site from the Renton area, to utilize N. E.Third Street and turn right into the site, thus avoiding any turning conflicts with major traffic volumes westbound towards the Renton area on the Maple Valley Highway. Likewise, westbound traffic from the City of Renton 4- October 28 , 1985 Maple Valley area, destined to the proposed site, would turn freely from the Maple Valley Highway right into the site. During the P.Y. peak hours the reverse would be true, eastbound traffic would turn right out of the site onto N. E. Third Street and meld with tr.e existing traffic volumes eastbound. Westbound traffic could turn right onto the Maple Valley Highway from the site and meld with the minor traffic volumes heading towards the Renton area. In summary, it is recommended that right turn in, and right turn out on: y, be facilitated along N. E. Third Street, subject to security conditions such that only the office building and warehouse patrons are accommodated and short-cutting from N. E. Third Street to Maple Valley Highway or vice versa by the general public is prevented. This will result in a higher level of service at the entranceway from the Maple Valley Highway and likewise should not jeopardize the existing level of service along N. E. Third Street. Left turn lane storage facility calculations from the Maple Valley Highway into the proposed site as submitted 1/3//83 appear to be adequate. Left turn storage facilities under the proposed concept from N. E. Third onto the site will not be required since we propose a right turn in and right turn out only concept. City of Renton 5- October 28, 1985 Construction of the proposed project, incorporating the traffic routing considerations contained herein will result in no significant impact to existing traffic characteristics on the adjacent arterial streets and highways. If you have any questions or desire any additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. Yours truly, 4? 474:t G. R. (Bob) Parrott, P. E. ac Attachments SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type General Office Building ITE Land Use Code 710 Independent Variable-Trips per .1 ,000 Gross Square Feet Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 12 . 30 43 . 5 3 . 6 35 2 3 3 Peak A.M. Enter 1 . 86 3 . 3 , 1 . 3 8 _ 210 Hour Between _ Exit 0 . 35 1. 0 0. 1 8 210 of 7 and 9 Total 2 . 32 5 . 9 1. 2 25 150 Adjacent P.M. Enter 0 .27 0. 7 0. 1 4 125 Street Between Exit 1. 36 2 . 6 0 . 7 4 125 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 2 .20 6. 4 0. 8 24 122 Peak A.M. Enter 1. 86 3. 3 1. 3 8 210 Hour Exit 0 _ 35 1. 0 0.1 8 210 of Total 2 - 32 - 5 - 9 1 . 2 25 150 Generator P.M. Enter _ 0.27 0 . 7 Li 4 125 Exit 1 . 36 ? _ 6 0. 7 4 125 Total 2 . 20 6 . 4 0 8 24 122 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 3 31-1 8 9 1 0 13 83 Peak Enter 0. 19 0. 2 0 . 1 2 88 Hour of Exit 0 _ 16 0 2 0 1 2 . AR Generator Total Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Source Numbers 2, 5 . 19 , 20 , 21 , 51, 53, 54 , 72 , 88, 89, 92, 95, 97 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6-Trip Generation Rates Date: 1975, Rev. 1979 SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type General Office Building ITE Land Use Code 710 Independent Variable-Trips per Employee Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 3. 59 11. 21 2 . 42 18 446 Peak A.M. Enter 0 . 35 0 , 40 0. 27 3 284 Hour Between Exit 0 . 06 0 . 11 0 . 05 3 284 of 7 and 9 Total 0 .59 1. 43 0 . 36 18 ,446 Adjacent P.M. Enter 0. 08 0 . 10 0 . 02 3 284 Street Between Exit Q.24 0. 37 0.2 3 3 284 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 0.57 1. 79 0 . 2 7 18 447 Peak A.M. Enter 0 . 39 0. 40 0 .27 3 284 Hour Exit 0. 06 0 . 11 0.05 3 284 of Total 0. 59 1 4 3 0. 36 18 446 Generator P.M. Enter O. 08 n _ 1 0 0. 02 3 284 Exit 0. 24 0. 37 0 .23 3 284 Total 0 57 1. 79 0. 27 18 447 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends n R1 2 . 26 n 3n 13 336 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total 0. 21 0 . 71 0. 04 13 336 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Source Numbers 19 , 20 , 88 , 89 , 92, 95 , 97 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6-Trip Generation Rates Date: 1975 , Rev. 1979 SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type _—__ Mini -Wa rebou se--___ ITE Land Use Code —151 Independent Variable—Trips per 1,_000J3rmss-_Square Feet of Building A-r a- Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 2 . $ 4 . 4 1.7 6 61 _ 7 Peak A.M. Enter Hour Between Exit of 7 and 9 Total 0. 17 0. 27 0. 06 6 61 . 7 Adjacent P.M. Enter Street Between Exit Traffic 4 and 6 Total 0.29 0. 42 0. 18 6 . 61. 7 Peak A.M. Enter Hour Exit of Total 0.2E 0. 44 0. 19 6 61 7 Generator P.M. Enter Exit Total 0. 32 0 . 50 0. 19 6 61 . 7 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 2 , 5 3. 5 1. 7 6 61. 7 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total 0. 40 0. 60 0. 2 4 6 .__ L Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends 1. 7 2 . 3 1. 1 6 61 . 7 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Source Numbers 113 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates Date: 1982 SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type General Office Building ITE Land Use Code 710 Independent Variable—Trips per Acre Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 240 . 1 299.7 51 20 7.9 Peak A.M. Enter Hour Between Exit of 7 and 9 Total 19 .2 86 9 14 9. 2 Adjacent P.M. Enter Street Between Exit Traffic 4 and 6 Total 18. 0 81 8 15 9- 3 Peak A.M. Enter Hour Exit of Total Generator P.M. Enter Exit Total Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Source Numbers 19 88 89 , 92 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6----Trip Generation Rates 1979Date: VOIF MERCER ISLAND SANS OFFICE P.O.BOX 580•MERCER ISLAND,W!""""3TON 98040 A/C 206/232-8815 RAY FIEDLER S/ 17/Vr Y 7i ,- i 371W M frfj y //( /AY Nielson S:initli 80/40/ k &2OSS ,4, 6o oao 'F t Architects and Planners 5/7E 6eass /E--zF4 45;ax f 2440 76111.,5E.3ox /0 6 2 Ai), OF rMPLOYECS 255- t Mercer lslanaV«+Ishingti i 98040 200 232-5090 6r:sit-a/at arri f lw/NG B0/40#6 N2E4 6DX /2,3 = 73F Apr; 5 7 A ,4 3.33x 240•/ = 799' ,SOT F/,4 8120• F/111=14)/6 5 253-x 3,57 = 9/5- Apr.- 1/42.5r a4.5E 9L7o Ao7 ASSUME- 55% 70/Frail R w? 1 5aA 451/0 / 'J MA/Ie l/,LLEy = 400 A.M. 77444 tAJ 90/, • 5d/M 1.zf< T 7V2MS e, xr/ = lo0/y/L. 15% _ 27/ . k vg Prilit LEFT 7U1V Rift/z, esAGASl /N TURN L.A E 22309 Z2209 MAftE V,4 U,EY I/ (lAY 2/ 09 io/aZ r Az27 / ) /99Io '2475-0 7 BY N /'AY F1 NAME: JOIt II I_O(;n I ION I II F I I Sl^,I I !AAII Fr( SP-A VE DRIVEWAYA1 . DY MArrr ouMCVAuy1-1 WAY GEIVERAL, OFF/GC 51..1/,LL7/jJG 7T2/P C- 1s,lEP4471014 RATE s ,c Nielson ®, Smith v/F E F'os i R Architects and Planners 2460 76TMAVE,5E. VOA iota 8 f/LD/NG AREA 60 x/2,3 = 737 Arir 5 3.3,3X249,1 = 799ADT. ADAGE 820 t d EHPLY EES 255x 3.5-1 = 9/5 ADT. U56 AcF X, frQ i s'" 61166 . ao Aar A451JME s % 7b M RENTON ASSUME i5590 /MAPLE VAL c.EY = 40o AM, TAX 255 x.35 = .9o/NR. 9Dx, = /HR. 7 P J LF 7 Tale1JS R M. 1 K t c17` 255 x,24 = 6o/Hg, 60 `45 AAryi ,M r Lilting8vun1D1/ACCE3 /A1. 7-9 AM. P WES7 IUD 5255//HE. 4-(o PM. 27pM. Ff NODUND 240/N12. 4- 7-9 Pam, 7R 7721 fic7G E57714IA7W0 AT MAX /O AD7- = /% - . OM- /-1/ l/WAj T 6Arec/1 Reccep #2//, hARMEL/NK - NM 1 N AT 1.1 1 PO4 PG, 1 Vo =1377 VA =50 5= /751 PRo/-1 TABLE 1 1% 71 XXS = Ab A(V 7 57aRAG E y LASE : /75'S7V,ertG < 2,c"' F OV/raEQ 4,t,, x 2_• 1 Atko4 0 1 \i .r_,, z1 s---T A" J Y COI L -roN Smoi 6e 2 T L m'L VAu.EY NIc-NWAY 5 rz. 10 A,___-_-__..A,_ r ZI809 ZAC $ To T SnE- VIA N,E.'3a"' 8ST 0/21) PEEN NE6L WooLP Mi71GATE Tc kAITONS }kY1t) AEOVE) I I V(i do Atl I MN:,i IvS 7 7 1,.u[S .s O V9 01- f =V y l J_]1 I:, 1\1011 v:)O 1 a`:re N 0". y S n 0 riyrl tlr r 1- 4 YY 9 vY z-5) N X'177'f •,y 'c 'tli - -__ - b0lpjrVlJ ny10 ,i) /V75/ U 9 1740,4h 1? V 0 1 Voi P)01)- :N i 7 It 12ter))1H 117.41;9T .(1-11i 1 H i XVMN91/ drldw 1-+211U. lai 74, save 8 s fig )1Z"--a 91`Z- t • 04 SinVI 2 cn dome l51M Soda L) 7b/.L tr----- Th 1 14 W/g2 Wad'hN 6-L 9I CPC;te = i SZ f,..CL/ '5h4 2% 4 o/ - 1 Vl 1=s ` 11/ar/,d cx SL/ -"S os= iA LUF/ = A 6'9/.J :Wei 1/S in.49D• 24c) _ _L-407ad glivixthal gtiovl : Wiri;~/f C Z4i ado23 J 11,14 A6'/If'/// 4vt1 Rmi 9-fj VW 7 /Z = '2!A'24/1 on/ 4iv kV Id a'7-* rah,v3d %It- 'i eadle 4Nno —/Y! WW '2 1bc #1,0d W6-I lY/h/ e..&I £Z - 2f/211d'LE/ QI'VO A'.2W 'W'Y --7.-- 11. a Allvin77Jf/A0n 4 V IC , • G d 7-* y/H Wel S,' = 'V) z//LZ t eva 2 7 'W 14&& 'a' d 6-6M' 6Z NW 2.41 ES- = 'z6' 21.41vS /Y9f2L 1. 1 WV ff 1 9.*YlCY'W f)39 41:7391, 'f1 A9116'4 -bI/' leVi 17/£/ cc7 1l VrrTn/2 /Wi-5 Iia3Iu AVU I-ZCZ/90Z 0/V r_, OV088 NO1ONIV INV1SI U30Vi311•08S X08 O'd 33IiiO S31VS ONV1SI H30V V4 a i o.s rrm aII mr u uw ways. . . Unsignallzed "T". intersection t..apactuy ..atcuIai"a... . I I I Intersection Location Plan: Counts: 1)A/PLE V//ae_t.&y /-/Wy Date /9°' Day. 1/1./`4.a y A B Time / V/Z 1 K I fit` 1 I - — - Control 7 P (' /) C S/A.E OR/dE l t/.7/Prevailing Speed__4 ne Hourly Demand Traffic Volumes fmm-4_to 6 • P m Approach A j B 7 C 'Y' Movement Ar Aa , B, ( Br Cf. '1 Ca r.- Volume 6,00 7 2 /3 33 37 _ 4 pch t.ce Li*it Step I Right Turn from C Ca Conflicting Flows= MN= th AR + Ar = from Fig. I) 60¢"o" Critical Gap from Table 2 T,= 7-0 sec Capacity from Fig.2 = Mv.=Mt = 3&U . et V Shared Lane - See Step 3 No Shared Lane Demand= Ca= kA Available Reserve= Mt -Ca= ea Delay&Level of Service(Table 3) 0 Step 2 Left Turn from B B,. r Conflicting Flows= Mr,= AR + Ar = from Fig. I) 7 + OQ = GD, .. a oildCritical Gap from Table 2 T,= 6.6 sec Capacity from Fig.2= MN.=M,= 36-0 rich Demand= Bc= 9 •ca Capacity Used= Ipp(B1IM,)= 2.5 qE Impedance Factor from Fig.3= P,_ -9e Available Reserve= M,- Bc--- 351 .cA Delay&Level of Service(Table 3) :5/0/-t f?If/n 7s F231 Step 3 Left Rim from C C, '\ Conflicting Flows=MN= thAR+ Ar + Bc + Br = from Fig. I) 4 +( + j+% _ (146.,, Critical Gap from Table 2 T,_ 2c G sec Capacity from Fig. 2 = MN.=- 30 ,eA Adjust for Impedance MN,x P,=M,= z" , ea No Shared Lane Demand= Cc= eA Available Reserve= M,-Cc= pet Delay&Level of Service(Table 3) 0 V/ Shared Lane Demand= Ca+ Cc=Ca,= B 2- pre Shared Lane with Right Aim Ca + Cc) Capacity of Shared Lane- Mt'= (Ca/Mt) +(Cc/M,) Mt,= S8 K. Available Reserve= Mu-Cat s - Z4 a Delay&Level of Service(Table 3) //-/1-t Ad Overall Evaluation Unsignalized "T" Intersection Capacity GatCulaiion rurrn 1 1 r III Intersection Location Plan: Counts: WAPGE 1/46tEy /'ivy Date /99a 4110/Day Wee tda Li A a Time Ae-I pe tl R lCITS' ControlSTOP LR 1// q E OQIVEWAy Prevailing Speed_ O Hourly Demand Traffic Volumes from 7 to___2____.. A m Approach A T B 7 C —y' Movement Ar AR Thi R. ( Br -6-' Ct. '\ Ca r" volume 4,2 50 e,Z. /3 5 9 I Z. pChI.ccTahkII Step I Right Morn from C CR f Conflicting Flows=MN= A AN + Ar =( from Fig. I) 29 + /49Z _ /5717 M Critical Gap from Table 2 T,= 7 0 sec Capacity from Fig.2= M,v.= M,= 8 a ,,, Shared Lane—See Step 3 No Shared Lane Demand= Ca= KP Available Reserve= M,—CR= pra Delay&Level of Service(Table 3) CD Step 2 Left Morn from B Bt. r Conflicting Flows=MN= AR + AT = id from Fig. I) 50 + /49Z = /59Z, Critical Gap from Table 2 T,= Co. O sec Capacity from Fig.2= MN.=M,_ ,/00 pca Demand= Be= GZ Pell Capacity Used= 100(B,,/M,)= to Z' % Impedance Factor from Fig.3= Ps= 0.5 Available Reserve= M,— Bt.= 3 8 KA Delay&Level of Service(Table 3) Ve1/on y G-.t s I E I Step 3 Left Morn from C Ct. 1 Conflicting Flows=MN= AR+ Ar + B,, + Br = from Fig. I) SS +/442+Gz+/3fa /7/4—. 0 Critical Gap from Table 2 T,= 9•0 sec Capacity from Fig.2= MN•__3' pr. Adjust for Impedance MN.X P,=M,= /5 KP No Shared Lane Demand= CL= ree Available Reserve= Ms—Ct.= eel Delay&Level of Service(Table 3) 0 V Shared Lane Demand= CR+C,,=C„= Z/ pd. Shared Lane with Right Turn CR + CL) Capacity of Shared Lane= M's= ( CR/M,)+(C,,/Ms) M,s= 2 8 pre Available Reserve= M,3—CR,,= 7 Kh Delay A.Level of Service(Table 3) Vey L.-2 a.toys I C I Overall Evaluation OF R,: 4/4 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0*,09q 6-O SEPT- October 16, 1985 Nielson & Smith Architects aid Planners 7435 S.E. 27:h Street Box 1062 Mercer Island, Wa. 98040 Re: CU-J62-85 - Ramac, Inc. Gentlemen: This office has received notice that the information necessary to process your application was not pro\,ided the City as required. Therefore, you application will be dismissed. This office has no choice in the matter since items cannot be continued indefinitely, they must be continued to a time and date certain. The dismissal is without prejudice, and you may pursue your request without the payment of a new fee. The only requirement is that all the normal notice requirements be observed. Unless this office hears to the contrary, the item will be dismissed as of Monday, October 21, 1985. If this office can be of further assistance, please feel free to call. Sincerely, o T1„ FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: Ramac, Inc. TO A= (54 f< J01 Smith 4 i/ ' Ii, 0iI SM 1i7 R L1JG(_.._UGct7 andl Planners AX - idgrot 'l • f 7, r M Mercer t w1 98040 PAR-Acicin SUBJECT ed-L/ -I.r fammIG Pam. DATE /6/ 1/ /CS MESSAGE !'/IY/,Hiia r,Iij/•diiiidei&ei;frAlliroefrta:4-411v.Adii GlivAiM,p,f,d417 i4i-e/A=Z•Pligise>A9se 71e;hti,Se-‘,711/030ee) eti,d /4/"./.4.4e,ioak 4)1209,' 'GL+iL klN(/4`,%L!iLSIGNED 11044/ro? 0/0,3e-- „a40,s_.,/6004;r44&1 REPLY RECEIVED O C T 2 f 1985 CITY OF RENTONHEARINGEXAMINER SIGNED DATE / / REDTFDRJ® 4S 472 SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 INTACT - POLY PAK (50 SETS) 4P472PART3WILLBERETURNEDWITHREPLY. OF R4,4 II c) t; ® z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTORz 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0ED SEPT BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: October 14, 1985 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: RAMAC, INC./CONTINUED HEARING/CU-062-85 The Environmental Review Committee is holding Mr. Shane's request to reconsider the condition on access for the proposed mini-storage warehouse presently being reviewed under file CU-062-85. The request did not contain sufficient information. Therefore, the ERC requested that the applicant provide additional traffic information. No information has been received and it is suggested by staff that the public hearing scheduled for October 22 be continued indefinitely. The staff will inform Mr. Rockhill, who is a party of record, and also republish and repost at the appropriate time. RJB:ss 1993Z RECEIVED DCT 14 1985 CITY OF RENTON HEARIN:5 EXAMINER CITY'0;. REN-ioN ri) ` 7Renton, ,1a. 4 r-': 17 Sept. 17, 1985 r. SEP 1 ! 1985 TO: Roger Blaylock FR:Randall Rockhill RE:RAMAC Request for change in access to self-storage project As suggested by the Hearing Examiner I am senAng you my views on the RAMAC Proposal. 1.As a resident of Monterey Terrace I wish to suppprt the view of the ERC regarding access as stated on paje 3of the Preliminary Report to Hearing Examiner the Environmental Review Committee has specifically required primary access from this site to the south through the new entrance that will be created with the construction of the office complex." 2.Any change in the above requirement would be detriment2l to the area. It also would lead to request for access to thikd from the office complex when and if constructed. 3.. If the project is constructed as recommended in the Sept. 17 Preliminary Reppvt, that is with access to Maple Velley to the south I feel this is a reasonable use of the land, however if any change is made in the proposed access plan our area would have serious reservations of the entire project and would wish to be heard on the subject.. 4.---"sedWllkeArJeF119161,:ta-7"e9 / ca.:Logan Garrison, President 11/&;Monterey Community Glub s 3/ RaMac, Inc. September 16, 1985 Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Attention Enviormental Review Committee Gentlemen TS rsK 2cv Sia ..><< ,k RaMac Inc. appeatthe Enviormental Review Committee decision to not allow traffic to ingress and egress from old Bronson Way for the following reasons: 1. Information supplied by RaMac's traffic consultant indicate traffic generated from the proposal will be minimal with 95% use at off peak traffic hours. 2. Ingress only from old Bronson Way will cause little if any impact on Bronson Way or North East Third. 3. RaMac Inc. suggests a rewording of the conditions to no traffic to exit on Bronson Way until a satisfactory Traffic Study and or a revision is made ie. right in, right out. Thank you for your review of this matter. CITY Or RE ON Sincer 12 SEP 16 1985 BUII DMG/ZONING DEPT. Dan Shane RaMac. Inc RaMac, Inc. • P.O. Box 653, Renton, Washington 98057 • (206) 392-4199 1918Z CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 17, 1985 AGENDA COMMENCING A 1. 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENT ON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. CITY OF RENTON, PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Application for Substantial Shore!' e Development Permit (File SM-008-85) to allow the construction of a new swimming pier and application for variances (File V-066-85) from Section 7.12.06 of the City of Renton Shoreline Master Program to allow an oversized dock; located at the southwestern end of Gene Coulon memorial Beach Park on the shore of Lake Washington. THE KENCO COMPANY Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a tilt-up building having approximately 27,360 square feet of warehouse space and 3,040 square feet of office space, file SA-065-85; located on the west side of East Valley Road and approximately 820 feet south of the intersection of S.W. 27th Street. RAMAC, INCORPORI ED Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a one and two story self-storage building having 30,850 square feet of area to be located in a B-1 zoned district, file CU-062-85; located at the 100 block of Bronson Way N.E. (east of I-405 and north of Maple Valley Highway) 1929Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 17, 1985 APPLICANT: RAMAC, INC. (NIELSON AND SMITH) FILE NUMBER: CU-062-85 A.SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval of a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a one and two-story self-storage building having 30,850 square feet of area to be located on B-1 zoned property. B. GE VERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: RAMAC, INC 2.Applicant: Neilson and Smith 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) Located at the 100 block of Bronson Way N.E. (East of I-405 and north of Maple Valley Highway). 4. Existing Zoning: B-1, Business Use. 5.Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1, General Use; R-1, Residential - Single Family; B-1, Business Use; P-1, Public Use; H-1, Light Industrial; and H-1, Heavy Industrial. 6.Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial. 7. Size of Property: 1.67 acres. 8.Access:Maple Valley Highway. 9.Land Use: Undeveloped property. 10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Multiple Family Residential Uses East: Single Family Residential Uses South: Cedar River Park West: I-405 C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Rezone ( -- B-1) 1522 Aug. 2, 1955 Rezone (R-1 - B-1) R-017-82 3677 Nov. 15, 1982 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1.Utilities: a. Water: There is a 12-inch water line along Maple Valley Highway along the southern property line and a 24-inch water line along the west property line. b. Sewer: There is an 8-inch sanitary sewer line along the west property lines. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water drains into the Cedar River drainage system. 2. F ire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Not Applicable. PRELIMINARY REPORT - IHE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON, BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT FILE CU-062-85 PAGE 2 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Not Applicable. b. Middle Schools: Not Applicable. c. High Schools: Not Applicable. 5. Recreation: Not Applicable. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-711, Business Use (B-1). 2. Section 4-748, Conditional Use Permit. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Commercial Areas Objective and Commercial Structure and Sites Objective, Commercial Goal, Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January, 1985, pp. 16-17. 2.Northeast Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January, 1985. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. l he applicant, Ramac, Inc., is requesting a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a 30,850 square foot building located on 1.6 acres under provisions of the B-1, Business Use, zone Section 4-711(B)(3)(n). This section allows the construction of a self-service storage facility when contained entirely within one building. 2. I he applicant has created the illusion of one building by extending roof lines and linking portions of structures together and creating an enclosed compound where motor vehicles would drive into the building and access the individual storage lockers from inside. Wood siding will be utilized on the structure covered with semi-transparent Olympic stain. The building will be trimmed in cream and teal blue and utilize a concrete gray tile roof. At the maximum height, the structure will be approximately 24 feet. A ten-foot landscape buffer area has been presented around the entire perimeter of the building. The intent is to blend the building with the apartments to the north and the proposed office building to the south. The intent of the code section is that the typical facade of a self-service storage building is not acceptable in a B-1 zone. Therefore, the design must appear to look like a commercial structure. Until this time, there has not been a reasonable attempt by an architect to present this type of image. The design that is presented is very creative and in the opinion of the Building and Zoning Department meets the basic concept of the code section. 3. The Enviornmental Review Committee has issued a declaration of nonsignificance. The appeal period will expire on Monday, September 16, 1985, at 5 p.m. The Environmental Review Committee has also used their substantive authority to restrict access to the north on Bronson Way to emergency access only. This provision is also appealable until September 16 to the Hearing Examiner. 4. Section 4-748(C) establishes review criteria for conditional use permit applications. The applicant's presentation clearly demonstrates compliance with the intent of the 11 conditional use criteria. I he proposal complies with comprehensive plan and zoning codes ' and there does appear to be a community need. Adequate parking and traffic circulation have been provided, and sufficient landscaping has been proposed around the building. The key issue seems to be relationship to the acceptability of the use for the specific location. PRELIMINARY REPORT T HE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON, BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT FILE CU-062-85 PAGE 3 ISSUE: Is the proposed self-service storage facility an appropriate use for the specific site? The property is zoned B-1, Business Use. The business use classification allows all commercial retail activity. These uses can vary greatly in intensity. The subject site has major development limitations which must be addressed in any proposed use of the site. The steep slope to the west divides the existing department building and the proposed office and self-storage facilities from the single family residential subdivision of Monterey Terrace. Both Maple Valley Highway and I-405 along with N.E. Third Street create a limitation of access to the site. I he apartment complex presently has access to the north, but the Environmental Review Committee has specifically required primary access from this site to the south through the new entrance that will be created with the construction of the office complex. With limited access and visibility, the site should be limited to a lesser commercial intensity. 1 he major factor to determine intensity in the City of Renton has been traffic generation. Any commercial activity other than the proposed self-service storage facility would generate several times the anticipated traffic volume. If 20,000 square feet of office was proposed for the site, daily traffic volumes would exceed 350 trips. The self-service storage facility would average less than one tenth of that traffic generated by an office building. The Building and Zoning Department believes that the proposal is the best use of the property because it reduces the intensity of use to an acceptable level but is still economically viable for the applicant. ISSUE: 5. Does the proposal create any unacceptable impacts upon the adjacent users? The proposal is compatible in architectural style and size with the adjacent office and apartment uses. The proposal is separated by more than a 50 foot topographic difference from the single family residential uses to the east. There will be no view blockage or infringement into the activities of the adjacent single family area if the sloped area is maintained in a greenbelt. The landscaping around the building will help buffer the intensity of the building from the freeway and the adjacent multiple family and commercial uses. f he greatest impact would appear to be the visual one of someone looking down on the site from Monterey Terrace. In most cases, the property owners would be looking out at the vista. If they tended to look down, they would appear to see the roof of an office structure in the way it is configured. The roofline appears as one, but in actuality it is a series of roofs with the driving aisles in between uncovered. 6. In conclusion, the proposal appears to meet the specific criteria of Section 4-711(B)(3)(n) and the conditional use criteria Section 4-748(C). The Building and Zoning Department believes the design is innovative and aesthetically pleasing to blend in with the adjacent structures. It does not introduce additional traffic which is a primary concern for the area or create a visual impact from ground level or from above. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the conditional use permit request by Ramac, Inc., file number CU-062-85, be approved as presented. L ; 1 0 PACIFIC CAR \*4 ` . • t. ,r•.. . T r.• ' a rr• ... 1 IIt \,r. y ) ___- y I ail; l• . Q*17''. : .( f?' •• r _. q !• ;•,-. c'.. 1 !_ 1:,(A• Ter. ri -: ram—1 . t c s. j/ Y/i/0 1.:,41 7 • " t =_ I i„z..zi4v 1,41T. :: L„,..., ; . . ,. . ,., I ' . '. . . iiii;l1 //,,..?. Frl C-:= .f ' ILAI 1 .\ r ,• ice_ 1> 11 \ L_1 • MI L-1 as 1 , R 1 V r J ly 1A•a it • jam..J •• • ,i •• l t r , e 1 I BERTY O I G s r r PAQK ? A I • u. P-1 CEDAR RIVFQ I CfM. R l PART. V • Ili'7 7 / J I r N\ SH_ 1 1 t'e, G- 1 i1 1: j. s I I' 1 I H- 1 1 r, N•. \ —1 I l e R 2 1. 1\• 1 I1 1 I f : +1 1 `•1 I I 11 I 1 RAMAC, INCORPORATED CU-062-85 APPLICANT RAMAC, INCORPORATED (NIELSON & SMITHITOTAL AREA ± 1 .67 ACRES PR I NC I PAL ACCESS MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY EXISTING ZONING B-1, BUSINESS USE EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY PROPOSED USE SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMERCIAL' COMMENTS I\\ i " . -) ‘' ';ONE ELEMENT d• s• o,'..:.:::.::.:.::::::.:: i.::• i- b::•-'.ia,),) t 1 : :I Sing le Familyy Commercial I.,*, a LowMDuetnsamly Office / Offic e ', ii.4111 i aaaaa ii:-.... it RP .. r i ...,... , II 1 . ..H:. Medium Don= ......„.o• 0.0.0.000.0.... Public/Quasi-PutAle:ikir ..”93,,, . ..1:::•••:.... Multi-Fa 00.0„„,-, i .! , : 4 , P•iiiin 1kriin311111:: ..,.,,.. . e. ispiaase :,.4a••• :,,,, 46:44. r.. . , 71r.,:::: ::•.'' ...:i r7 4 Light Industrial Pr:: :,2:::1inljg... Irs/ Recreation Heavy Industrial 1,41 0 .. Greenbelt''.54.Wi i••• Manufacturing Pz1.z,,,, .,3I ' q-% .,:z•• •''..-C• '••••.7:•-•,^ i f-s • - or:" • u".. . f all W •.., - S.••-, ^f,..?::'d- ,-.F., c•..••c'“...:' "" -.., rt....% 1983 0.C:...5.•;:..*•1-,....•5•'..cc.e-J'.:-- ..F;''''''':=I, -L,•••• •e....,' -'-.,-•:.r:"j.:•,:•. 4,-e.*...t.:,-- . G.;. 73:1..V.,f•%:':E5 :;:,-,..,.' ---sr"..,'N.L..,5::;.,- -4.-..,..-.,:e....,:--:, 11,1: 11 -•••• ••••<-1,::7.'.1.;--;;r__,••A.1%..-., --. l'.,:':". 1..•.'.'-."--..' c III i ' \1. iiiiiiiiit.0-1, •.''''" e'7.1.-- e•-•:., 5.::::::.- 7,7x.:t::,,...-.44.6....: 1: 4::..3:7.... z,;:- c:.'..°....;.,:•,,,•:.,. 1;',..r,.,,,-,,fr. s.-j--i-':,i't:';''`": 6';:`''''''-''' r 411111111P • ,, siene'. ' ••• w%.% \ M ill 5:-:.:•:-..•::','„; ., 7 mg A ati • r 'ft t 7'.`:;:-.:,, '.• ,., istrz 0000.0..•- 22. INVIVI 1 I •4. A c.,..,I-•-, 4.,,,....„. , 1., ti: 4:.:....-..... --..-:--,-••- moms LAKE t. i 14 - 1 0114:!.:7.:.. `..!':‘,. 1 r•-• '•. 0. ::,::... .:,i, ,,_.... ... 11, .,i......,.. • .. ...::::::: •,, .•.,?I..r•.' t EN r•-•-.0. pi. •; 8,116* lit, c,•:::;,, iSHINGTONVI i;::::::::::: es , 1 1 ' / el gii.::: :ow: • Wei". III 13:111 i›,.-1::. , 000•0000.0. , , „Iva 5R: I - unmet! I\! um1:Ii 0.00• r - Se."" 7:1 cl• I o0000 / le!IPA". if';'1';' 614614.116A6 ._-_ i• N''' • ' 114 . v•-"---777.7. ....-..11,%•iiiiiiii 0I. z • • • • • •.4•\.,,..... \t 4.,,::, miliiii. !4•.aa,.••• um.......- A r w •'"-; •••••••••••• .•-• ')Ii. '''''- :1i:Inwitti!• 1,,,,,_ ..,,,,,,,,,,!• MI i 11#111.: 00.; • • • • • • • •_•_ • .•_•_„,iiiiiii Y4- miack. •:::Akt' '4111 fZ, •••••••••••••••• • • • • : :::.i*i*::: g49$11-;:Nie %::.•- '1•1'''''- . 1,;:oggiai... •••••••••••••••••• Oe .0.0! '' W1Pr#11Vir.4 . t °.. . AO, I 1111111111111111ait"- L......i 6 1 Mog0:06.1 • • • ••• 0.0.0.0 ••• ••••••ii:...i::.. 1•0g0g0°,0gg.1.'1' • •• •• • . • • • • • • ' :::::., I rry -.--- ..k,....!9°1"--1 6120gq. AT'A . . • i • • • • • • • II ;•, •:.111111L i, •. ,. . 000.. 0.0„.• 0000.00.0.000„)(3rip„. • • • • • • • • • .00.00.00. 4 0°:. 1111:gigoc'og:g%lr, •••••••• ••••••• ••••••. • , . 1\11r11114 1,i 1H--:go. . • • • • • • • 00. ----,„,,aw.,a.. .,t7t0,0, 020% ••••••• • • , •••••• •• `..%. ` 111V. • sr. .: d00.... t.. 00.....0.4„. . . . gggrIgiiggg A ' ...A..I b • :'• II ::: :::: ::ii'ii', •'':: ::L 41,..:°,0ogggek•ts • • • r 1. . • • • E, • ,• 0„,„...... .... a. . r - ---., 4 411Mbi' XEll • • • .7. ' A. illt-C. lg. X.41 n__b, o -1.5°ageo°o.g, ,.'. • • ro r 40.•eilft! ,11 3•c• ....••••••••:•:•:•:•:• ::•:•:•:•:•. 1:11:tril00• ::::::::::::::::•:•:•:-:•:-:•:•:•:•:•:•:. 1.•••go°°oao°04,,,°.• • • • 110 - - ••.• 11) 11IP 0.0°,.0°0°• ::::::: : 11al• • •&a • '1 0. 000 .x.,:,:::.:0ff::.z::::::• 1Ia'III::0°gog°0 0°°g gg gg: 4414• 47, •1"7-7-74. c,;...0 a.i tlink• II lit toSalklegthig IL:22 ,1000,,o,,o0o00,,Iliga et a 00 .i g ' _ •------ - • 7I:: .202020a00.0.4 000 r . 1°4 - i' F/ . - . 4 , ---.-,. :, ...._.. . .,- .-riiiii r-7--.77-00..0 0 0°0°00.• goo?" at II/r1, 8.:, so ,000000000.0„0,, 4,00 i At.0 ;3ogoco•OgOgogogo:f4, 4Zo,g,.; r:I;raN 1,... 7,4,efr.,. ,‘' .:::•:::::::::::aii:.:: 1/4-z-----,,:000° 00000.0%:0:0! lig., 0g9g9:30:ogogoor• •/.00. 4 la, ill;,.....4 164 eal e •' ' .t.....--... ::::1:",::!.. ?..9.:° 0: 00110: 0°::.ok::::00:::01.1.°:00°0: 0°04:00°00°00°:2. °,3 _oggg,ggggg;„-'1 . i in I,. in ,g0;0,70000000002?g. t5,. 0.,114111114110...-0.14itiii.- 4-/-,;,„ gli...1.••:iliZ :0;11660°100110::030:::.0: 011:0::0:00°010Stok ••:...• •• . t. 4re im. . • •.. ....• iitti t'k- alm:::,Abe•i•IM.6 .A.`.%44',.3k wises ilywr, i- J JOb"029'. 0.0% .::::::-...A.::W.,•caucApcapapamagAum. f Th7.--... .1 e5r47.:t 0. ie-,..„.,,, t, 1,,113,7„,, r joir •liroocv000.. i , ::::• i:i:•:•:•:: :;i:• :•:::::: • 0000000000000000000. 1, ... ........ ,46‘1411..VITI:, 00•244'. 1 :,:::r•., 2t.: i!--, _pr. I•r,1 000.• .::::::::::::::.:.:.:.::::.:. . 00000....009,00000... 0.4,....0.00008.00000000000. , 1::::::.:.:.:...": ::.:.. 0. •• ::::::::::::::::::::::::::.: •••----,. •000000.0• • , ••••,•-•:::::::: sltti::iiogcmogogc;g 1..;;;;;;;;-.4-f/*e.t- / •`,. \ - 00. , . gii:ii 4. 1.00000000000om 4,.. i„Amu, ogogq0g40• i,•ossolinews.A..; / , ,',. 1121 '\\' ' asea 1 ; iii::::i:iiM]: • •"/1/4•.°0°0°0%%°0°.• rt•,; 7!"::::,.A iii!...%• 111:::::::V.90:74;I t•Lti,,Ak4gt. t,`',.' I% • c MiiMi 'g7.1.,./..- '•°°• •• :: :::.::-::::: y•alli. s•:iii iiiiigastini;;;;Ili 1 V.2/ v- iy.,••••1 ,.? ,,, ,... 4ik...... . :::: i:i: :::]:: .0 ,1-,•,.c,•.•,. ,./,-;., , .'..:::.,.,:..:::::.:ISM f'',f'h;1',,.', *: •f•.!'f'1 P.,':is •.'••.:-:..•••••:•411•11 118.1:::::11::: 11:1111 .... '...:•' ' ---61•61 - '.:'iti '':.. • ....:.:•:.:'.... •.;..cf ,.‘"••••i •2.4' :.' :.::.'•'.:::.:.: ii= 1- ii-i-------- wr Limn" •.•••••••-- • ••" '.ni-k,.. "S,. N •• .;,..h eq, .C•ii -. ,..`' 74,-:,,,r2.`,I,A.Y,:,;;;•A.,;;..*%Atsurinsystr..„....7 a ;/.1,, ,.Y/- . 47%,-:•.';•'•'.. ;•r.tc;'-'•'•i) •••••'•".•°•"•r,r;ri.".•'' .:: :: ''::::ITO41'6'414ht. 6 :,,..;;12'f•i? -.•...,,.: 1 r? 3,-`-.',5',. ..'•../tr f-rli'. "*:':::: :::.NO Lunge mpg,.•Aggrgter o. .,•fv.: ,. ...i.„%;:c4tc 1Ni%, ,..ka, ,..-i_e., ,.. P:sy,;:.*7 1.0.0 ,,..4,J... • 4 I 01 r 1 -.."' 1( , (V • ''S 7-' i.fii.14'; re ..,.... ar,, ..., . .•„.., 117" iiiiii 1,:. L. k A..•. '. 'onell ';#6` -L. fit3kii6OX' c•••!•<,: i ,, : :, -.1.A " e!!!!!`••_ A ALT„:11,:k1P111 e,•• ' ,''„ .1,--t- . .',. . 7......:-..". 1., 3,1•., le.;614..: ;:;,..,...?:/i;1 L':.',.,: :.:..,- II. 41 •V ' ' • ' l'ilii7. . ' 1; MU k u'Al.:i`:,('i...,:-,:,..i.,...., ,444-440.-.4c....w i. . .... ....: s- v,- .e. I"' .x re ..,:,,I Pre.: f\i.'01.),,;41.::',, i s''' L'',':::,;%);,;: 31:?:.• i'!,, 2'..• 11; 0. 1):t- L:-" 2-, 11,..:,c.; 0•;‘) 0",. 3, 77(7.7)-3-. 11..,.:1!• ci;... ti?.,...',...;.•. ..,. 4144%''''''...7111111114111111i-4"..C. I.Ci*f. c..:C;...4 .:'''.WOES. 1 rayn. c4 ' A", - e. ' .- • -" 0 AN . Iiiiit'y 11 Ilkma : - • •',,se ' c','Ll•,(43,•in;•s',.`-',•:.( 1-',•'f''''':. . n.., war alai c,•. 0.3000 r,,p t•-.!(..,••?..;•51.t.:."., L,• ..r_...-*.. ------- ehc.-' .re •sp,,ott-., ...A4,,c_ i(,_ 0. 4.,. C••ev".t1S,,,,..,'„ s 0..,'0°•I I I t %POO 0 e).a,•'.AZ?•V'e)•.1 .•'i V• Irli ‘'''• . ligAth._, ...›..,9r• t_ri,r.:e.y..0g• 0. n.••..,.. -.,.,,.0;,n.(,)r.R..:0 S.,.19:;,‘.. .,.. .4 0 0 g?,s, memp.,...II 9 P,,,c.• c;,...,- ,;•,•4..,:,,'',.‘.•1-7;".•ri.•0-•"-•',"e) '. v -,''...v s•r' .1n!`!;,',0,',•'•••',.(1.; ..! , c-.o-.:i-,•:!,C.,..•13,2'..•'13 t.L.', .>.if:,-1.,,.,,r,.t..0.441e4 ......0.';•'..- le..)•th'.,".•-•CV r_'•`lc P.,.0 ,.q!,,- ,,. b"i'Sei,:•'::).' 11 V 4 easso.- .1-....o•I i , '• I:‘e tv•e.,,,,,k,-.'•...07,-v,•. .),..;•,41,•? u.,v....,•0..„„-, ,y,;.?.•;•arr- ii 1.2. • .1,•...:'.s?,;,•••-:-,,,W,•.' ,"•:" ' '•• ',.:',..'l r• '•••.,..1. ,t't L,..t '...i,•.. \ - , k 4 .g'N ..::. .:.:. .i.44,Ltasia',. `i •?0,,:` ",0,, •'$'.1,.4.1 .• EyNiri,;"v," '"-.t.-1.5..;''''''10 t:''4' •- / ; 1p '- '''A ..::::::::: T4 k:„.._ cLocl000000,.•0 .,•4 N,,401.• ,q., A,4... .:.•::::•••'''.. or".•!-- 4.1-"1,,,.. t • •.9;0°0• c."\\.: ••:•:•:.:::•:.•.:•:•:::::•::::::.:...al 1611Vtr--z.=-----•-1". ..:.... , 4 s•-•.,,, 4. /boo° ••• oo. 1 r,c,,.. 1.s.: • 0.0,0„, Jo't•,' oj le\ s• , __,'0.sti:•,. i,,,, „„„,.,A.ci,. Nam. s 1P4.TOM{ 3yy: w iY` i•.MRfH Arm VLJ11 swans L ( anew Ann fenny.,)( se MIN vr+a..aww: rare ail OM o...R - 1 44 -1"....-----\. 1 2( Mari ifr.n.art)H-h'a.', t Osa-ia tr i-. 7r iretars..eel'- 5 i i 1,.../...ra 61.41Crlin2 t tnw rea..tt...m A'di rn Alf 1&I I A OHC1r.1.'Munn A- 1 NOLLti'na-is F114.- 5 ...........,r ,.noon pVlu.ir..0J'i 1- - ernes., li J U V r 1di ii.... sus . a.ia y NO1Y . na - MiNto.iniiin- ,---.._ =IMP- 4= ccrrx r+ tacOS t Alrc NO:Ld/1SAT j.os....s.i*tr mw..®a aor r r N.r Z--. 4.%%), 7%. R g• ilfIt--r a..wiiw wac y...r,.. A.,a iL ao a..sre a..0 sn miotsoNlne i\ t ] wsr p•.raw WY)finer.«aa1 sy.t t.wrn.l\ 1•.eit Wa).rw..nc Y raw wulo.t.1.M r.0 I KtV1tW1IVb UtrMKIIhtIVI /UiV1J1UN : APPROVED ROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED G co pi2/3.)2.-5 Apo 1g 6 C°,ft/S Tiz u c / &) DATE: U /5`"15 SIGNATURE IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION S/199Z Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :SIZE Ei APPROVED EI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 4'2 co/4s' Srd.a r/F.b.E' oi E .c51/LD/.cJ G , 4ni49GJ/Gt '(k-- il/e vz C 27-, 4 .o O dog L i441,0 61 -7 C? 'L)C A o?. oi.F FG c. /0"):o CAE. /,11/,,Pj44,cr ' ?Co 4&<=4/geC7 DATE: f -- cio SIGNATURE OF R CTqp OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION S/199Z Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : PLIL hLOftner APPROVED EI-AlisED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 4eArledlex.teGe.aP . a_ 4c - c44u e s Once Gc/?- p 44,4- cev41.<-44,t4. e(•/ 42„.2.0i EA C 6 i441,146trli DATE:e/on/g5 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI Ei APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS JO NOT APPROVED DATE : SIGNATURE OF CIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 8/1982 Form 192 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7/b/r-y APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS M NOT APPROVED Im 1112I11111tS 1 Toi q3g. j M OMls R MreN -i-SEWER o WATER yEs. rSYS=111111UNMIT RIPI RE-SEWER , y MU MINIM AMA CNARSE-WATER Azo SPEICIM ANISII MIT AwEA CRANE-SEWER Aldo UPRIVER SMIa MAN i/,rzSAPPROVEDFIREWNWMCAT= IT FIRE DEPT. y FIRE FLY ALUMS 3(Ai - DATE : F- SIGNATURE OF I) •ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 192 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS OT APPROVED r c6 G_.S`. er). " REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; aAPPROVED ROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED DATE ; I SI TURE OF CIRECTOR OR AUT RIZED REPRES ATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; APPROVED I ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 0940N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-095-85 APPLICATION NO(s).: CU-062-85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a one and two story self-storage building having 30,850 square feet of area to be located in a B-1 zoned district. PROPONENT: RAMAC, INCORPORATED LOCATION, OF PROPOSAL: Located at the 100 block of Bronson Way N.E. east of I-405 and north of Maple Valley Highway). LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead ;agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not regi.fired under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There s no comment period for this DNS Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: /ou may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than September 16, 1985. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF CECISION: August 28, 1985 PUBLICATION DATE: September 2, 1985 i Zie-4P-2 an_//4 Ronald G. Nelson L. r, . S• ger Building and Zoning Director Policy Deve s.ment .-ctor Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director _ 0993N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-095-85 APPLICAT ION NO(s).: CU-062-85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a one and two story self-storage building having 30,850 square feet of area to be located in a B-1 zoned district. PROPONEVT: Ramac, Incorporated LOCATION OF PROPOSAI : Located at the 100 block of Bronson Way N.E. east of I-405 and north of Maple Valley Highway). LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible. Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-255C) APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than December 23, 1985. You shoulc be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: December 4, 1985 PUBLICATION DATE: December 9, 1985 Ronald G. Nelson L rr . S 'nger Building and Zoning Director Policy Dev opmen irector Richard C. H ghton Public Wor'<s Director 0989N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects: RAMAC, INCORPORATED (ECF-095-85) Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a one and two story self-storage building having 30,850 square feet of area to be located in a B-1 zoned district, file number CU-062-85; located at the 100 block of Bronson Way N.E. (east of 1-405 and north of Maple Valley Highway). CHARLES HENDERSON (ECF-106-85) Application to rezone 30.99 acres from G-1 to R-1, file number R-080-85, and application for preliminary plat approval to subdivide said property into 126 single family lots into a plat to be known as "Sunset Trails," file number PP-081-85; located on the east side of Duvall Avenue N.E. at the 2200-2300 block. CHEVRON, U.S.A., INC. (ECF-117-85) Application for conditional use permit and site plan approval to allow the expansion of ail existing service station by removing the existing pump islands and canopy and installing a new, larger pump island and canopy facility incorporating a mini-mart building, file numbers CU-097-85 and SA-098-85; located at 1419 North 30th Stre:3t. ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (ECF-119-85) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 120,000 square feet on an 11.74 acre site, file number SA-100-85; located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. EVERGREEN SPA AND POOL COMPANY (ECF-113-85) Application for substantial shorelines development permit to allow the construction of a swimming pool for the residence of Frank Lee, file number SM-012-85; located along the shoreline of Lake Washington at 5121 Ripley Lane North. ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (ECF-089-85) Application to allow for the construction of a single faced, off-premise advertising sign measuring 12 feet by 25 feet; located on the north side of Bronson Way North on the Burlington Northern right-of-way between Factory Avenue North and Sunset Boulevard North (letter attached). GLACIER PARK CO. (ECF-109-85) Application for site plan approval for Arby's Restaurant and a short plat of two lots and one track for roadway purposes, file number SA-083-85; property located east side of West Valley Road at the 2700 block. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by December 23, 1985. Published: December 9, 1985 FORM 115 NOTICE ENVIIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICAT ION NO. CU-062-85, ECF-095-85 PROPO3ED ACTION APPLICATION FOR CONDITIOJAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTIOn OF A ONE AND TWO STORY SELF STORAGE BUILDING HAVING 30,850 SO, FT. OF AREA TO BE LOCATED IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT, GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS I OCATFO AT -}IF 1 m BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.F. (FAST OF I-405 ANT) NORTH OF MAPI F VAI I FY HIGHWAY) . POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. ] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ODD ES NODES NOT HAVE 44 SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIR[3NMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL AWILL NOT BE REI3UIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 18 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., T]FCFT RFR 23. 1985 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION I pF R4,4A 6 © ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 9 co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 235-2540 43 09gr6-O SEPT'. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR September 9, 1985 Ramac, Inc. P. O. Box 653 Renton, Washington 98057 Re: Conditional Use Application for a Self-Storage Building, File CU-062-85; Property Located at the 100 Block of Bronson Way N.E. (East of I-405 and North of Maple Valley Highway) Gentlemen: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on August 8, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for September 17, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:ss 1928Z cc: Merritt Nielson 1 1919Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHING TON ON SEPTEMBER 17, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: CITY OF RENTON, PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Application for Substantial Shoreline Development Permit to allow the construction of a new swimming pier and application for variances from Section 7.12.06 from the City of Renton Shoreline Master Program to allow an oversized dock; located at the southwestern end of Gene Coulon memorial Beach Park on the shore of Lake Washington. THE KENCO COMPANY Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a tilt-up building having approximately 27,360 square feet of warehouse space and 3,040 square feet of office space, file SA-065-85; located on the west side of East Valley Road and approximately 820 feet south of the intersection of S.W. 27th Street. RAMAC, INCORPORTED Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a one and two story self-storage building having 30,850 square feet of area to be located in a B-1 zoned district, file CU-062-85; located at the 100 block of Bronson Way N.E. (east of I--405 and north of Maple Valley Highway) Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 17, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : September 6, 1985 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANETTE SAMEK-McKAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the S ate of Washington tc- u-t-oresidingin n.) on the 6 774 day of September, 1985. SIGNED: OF I Ozv t © 094 CITICE 41-6-0 SEP1°4,O City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a pEgtici HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON SEPlEMBER 17, 1985 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING:CU-°62-85 r1 REZONE From To 2 SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT T o ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 1W AND TWO STORY SELF STORAGE BLDG. SITE APPROVAL C_1 SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lots H PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM I 1 GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCAILD AT TT 100 BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N,E, (EAST OF I-405 AND NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HWY) LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION SIGNIFICANT cig NON—SIGNIFICANT FOP FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT RENT('"' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA" tAENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 0Q5 - 85 APPLICATION NJ(S) : CU-062-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : RAMAC, INCORPORATED PROJECT TITLE : RAMAC SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ONE & TWO STORY SELF-STORAGE BUILDING HAVING 30,850 SQUARE FEET OF AREA IN A 3-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION : LOCATED AT THE NO BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.E. (EAST OF I-405 & NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY) . TO : 1 PUBLIC WJRKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8/21/85 Ell ENGINEERING DIVISION I ( TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 1-1 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS ;_ COMMENTS OR SJGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. )N TUESDAY. AUGUST 20. 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : fRLD 6 E APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS l ( NOT APPROVED G (4''e,or2&A42-5" o 0 G PG COAis7-7zu c_L) f-oo°< lr ` DATE : 5, SIGNATURE OFF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT(' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA--MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - OQ5 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-062-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : RAMAC, INCORPORATED PROJECT TITLE : RAMAC SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ONE & TWO STORY SELF-STORAGE BUILDING HAVING 30,850 SQUARE FEET OF AREA IN A 3-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION : L)CATS AT THE 100 BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.E. (EAST OF 1-405 & NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY IIGHWAY) . TO : PUBLIC WJRKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8/21/85 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION l ] TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU l ] PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT l 1BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ' OTHERS :_ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . CN TUESDAY. AUGUST 20, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 2E APPROVED I ! APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 2,4.r) ,4s ems' A-b,e o/E .FaiL0/.1J G , ,a"-%d GJ/GL f,o7r cTi v. a .O Tib' f/-o.t i v L C,1,3 G /4AI/2 e/7 2$0 ' o?. A-7. 0Gac,J /CA) pp/eif/v7 S DATE : Y SIGNATURE OF R CT OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT(' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA--MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - OQ5 - 85 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION 1\0(S) : CU-062-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) AUG 121985 PROPONENT : RAMAC, INCORPORATED oFvpiOPNAN+T I1FPT. PROJECT TITLE : RAMAC SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ONE & TWO STORY SELF-STORAGE BUILDING HAVING 30,850 SQUARE FEET OF AREA IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION : L3CATED AT THE 1OO BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.E. (EAST OF I-405 & NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY) . TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8/21/$5 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PRE ENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT in OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SIGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , 3LEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON TUESDAY. AUGUST 20. 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ftjiy' lLOM&A(7 n APPROVED 1-AiOVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED grkjglirtiejev i GGaPA e "-`9 A46( e ^ ) e Gc/ p GA•t — 4- CefrtiLl.:ea,uler);\ EA C ce 4, 6Le DATE :00C SIGNATURE OF DIREC 0 OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 1 2 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - OQ5 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-062-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : RI.MAC, INCORPORATED PROJECT TITLE : RAMAC SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ONE & TWO STORY SELF-STORAGE BUILDING HAVING 30,850 SQUARE FEET OF AREA IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT, LOCATION : L( CATED AT TEE-JOO BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.E. (EAST OF 1-405 & NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY FIGHWAY) . TO : I ] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8/21/85 ENGINEERING DIVISION l ITRA =FIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTI _ITIES ENG , DIVISION I J FIRE PRE ENTION BUREAU I ( PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS :_ COMMENTS OR SJGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M , JN TUESDAY. AUGUST 20. 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS jElNOT APPROVED 4L--- (7/1473— DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTI BUILDING & ZONING DEPA"TMLI T DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - OQ5 - 85 APPLICATION NJ(S) : CU-062-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : RAMAC, INCORPORATED PROJECT TITLE : RAMAC SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ONE & TWO STORY SELF-STORAGE BUILDING HAVING 30,850 SQUARE FEET OF AREA IN A 3-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION : LL)CATED AT TUL 100 BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.E. (EAST OF 1-405 & NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY IIGHWAY) . TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8/21/85 El ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : I l UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS :_ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M , ON TUESDAY. AUGUST 20. 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; I77,ciry n APPROVED l ] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED d!'I SY_BJECT TO A 3-2.r ziAj,c) LATE NM ANT-WATER n/Q LATE MN NT-SEWER Np rYYSTE 1111111110111111 CHARGE-WATER EEC F4-r. SYSTEM PEVELNlNT CHARGE-SEWER fSPECILII$E$SPUTAREA CHARGE-WATER NO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER Aii) APPROVED WATER PUN ant-tt y“---t) APPROVED SEWER PUN 4S APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS BY FIRE DEPT. FIRE Ftr"V ANALYSIS 1!Q 1 6//g DATE : I 22_ ` " SIGNATURE OF D ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPA--MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 0Q5 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-062-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : REMAC, INCORPORATED PROJECT TITLE RAMAC SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ONE & TWO STORY SELF-STORAGE BUILDING HAVING 30,850 SQUARE FEET OF AREA IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION : L('CATED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.E. (EAST OF I-405 & NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY FIGHWAY) . TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8/21/85 n ENG [NEERING DIVISION TRA =FIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTI _ITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PRE /ENTION BUREAU i IPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SJGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON TUESDAY. AUGUST 20. 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS OT APPROVED ze c 1 . DATE : rg SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 1E2 RENT* BUILDING & ZONING DEPAIIMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 0Q5 - 85 APPLICATION NJ(S) : CU-062-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : R,\MAC, INCORPORATED PROJECT TITLE : RAMAC SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCT ON OF A ONE & TWO STORY SELF-STORAGE BUILDING HAVING 30,850 SQUARE FEET OF AREA IN A 3-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION ; LOCATED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.E. (EAST OF I-405 & NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY) . TO : PUBLIC WJRKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8/21/85 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTI _ITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS :_ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M, ON TU ESDAY. AUGUST 20. 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED DATE ; 3 d SI TURE OF DIR-CTOR OR AUT ORIZED REPRES ATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form I RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 0°5 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-062-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : RAMAC, INCORPORATED PROJECT TITLE RAMAC SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING. BRIEF DESCRIP-ION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ONE & TWO STORY SELF-STORAGE BUILDING HAVING 30,850 SQUARE FEET OF AREA IN A E-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION : LOCATED AT THE_100 BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.E. (EAST OF I-405 & NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY FIGHWAY) . TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8/21/85 ENG NEERING DIVISION ri TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : I ( UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION l l FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 1 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT l 1BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON TUESDAY. AUGUST 20, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ;// rrS[APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ( NOT APPROVED c. ( 7C DATE : D ? SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 0940N CITY OF RENT ON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-095-85 APPLICATION NO(s).: CU-062-85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a one and two story self-storage building having 30,850 square feet of area to be located in a B-i zoned district. PROPONENT: RAMAC, INCORPORATED LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located at the 100 block of Bronson Way N.E. east of 1-405 and north of Maple Valley Highway). LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not regLired under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This inforrration is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than `September 16, 1985. You shoula be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: August 28, 1985 PUBLICATION DATE: September 2, 1985 Z' j Ronald G. Nelson L r . S i ger Building and Zoning Director Policy Deve o ment i ctor Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director -. r OF R4-, e 7 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Z o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09gTED SEP1c4e(- BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: August 29, 1985 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Re',iew Committe2, SUBJECT: RAMAC, Inc./ECF-095-85/CU-062-885/Construction of a self-service storage building in a B-1 zone. The Environmental Review Committee, under its substantive authority, [Section 4-2822(D)] recommends to the decision-maker, the Hearing Examiner, that the conditional use permit request to allow the construction of a one and two-story self-service storage building having 30,850 square feet of area to be located in a B-1 zone be issued sut ject to the condition that access to the north onto Bronson Way be limited to emergency access only. Primary access is to be to Maple Valley Highway. Under Section 4-2822(D), the decision-maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ultimate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision-maker, the Hearing Examiner, then has the opportunity of asking the Environmental Review Committee for reconsideration or revising the recommended conditions. The applicant also has the ability to appeal this condition directly to the Hearing Examiner under authority granted in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within 14 days of the date that the DNS is final. Therefore, the appeal date would be Monday, September 16, 1985, at 5:00 p.rr . The appeal would be submitted in a form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-3011(B). RJB:1913Z:wr FORM 115 NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. CU-062-85 PROPOSED ACTION APPI ICATION FOR CONi1MTIONAI USE PENT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ONE AND TWO STORY SELF-STORAGF BUIIDING HAVING 30,850 SO. FT. OF AREA TO BE LOCATED IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT, GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS LOCATED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.E. (EAST OF I-405 AND NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY.) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. ] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL XWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL. NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 18 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:0 ID P M.,SEPTE BER 16, 198.5 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING &. ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ENvIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEti REVIEWING )EPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 12, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 20, 1985 ECF - 095 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). CU-062-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT: RAMAC, INCORPORATED PROJECT TI -LE: RAMAC SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ONE & TWO STORY SELF-STORAGE BUILDING HAVING 30,850 SQUARE FEET OF A2EA IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION:LOCATED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.E. (EAST OF I-405 & NORTH OF m9P1 F VALEY HIGHWAY) . SITE AREA: 1.6 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 30,850 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Eartf 2) Air_ 3) Water ti 4) Plants 5) Animals177 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities Sew-- ? COMMENTS: 7 /y/E 3 S. 4," e-2-- X '/ RECOMMENDATION: n DNS MITIGATED DNS ET EIS REVIEWED BY TITLE: DATE: 7 FORM ##14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 12, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 20, 1985 ECF - 095 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). CU-062-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT: RAMAC, INCORPORATED PROJECT TIT_E: RAMAC SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTFUCTION OF A ONE & TWO STORY SELF-STORAGE BUILDING HAVING 30,850 SQUARE FEET OF AFEA IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION:LOCATED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.E. (EAST OF I-405 & NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY) . SITE AREA: _ 1.6 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 30.850 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air_ 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Anima'ls 6) Energi and Natural Resources 7) Envirrnmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housi ig 10) Aesthi3tics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recra3tion 13) Histo.'ic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utili;ies COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: n DNS n MITIGATED DNS ni EIS REVIEWED BY: Ill"vlTITLE: Tlv.-/Ty v4Vel-7/ib 4$2 DATE:FORM # ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING CEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 12, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 20, 1985 ECF - 095 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). CU-062-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT: RAMAC, INCORPORATED PROJECT TITLE: RAMAC SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ONE & TWO STORY SELF-STORAGE BUILDING HAVING 30,850 SQUARE FEET OF AREA IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION:LOCATED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.E. (EAST OF I-405 & NORTH OF m8E11 VALLEY HIGHWAY) . SITE AREA: 1,6 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 30.850 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air_ 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Publit. Services 16) Utili .ies COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS pi MITIGATED DNS U EIS REVIEWED B l LPG/CG yf TITLE: f l DATE: E'/2- FORM ##14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING CEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 12, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 20, 1985 ECF - 095 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). CU-062-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT: RAMAC, INCORPORATED PROJECT TITLE: RAMAC SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING BRIEF DESCFIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTI.UCTION OF A ONE & TWO STORY SELF-STORAGE BUILDING HAVING 30.850 SQUARE FEET OF ALEA IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION:LOCATED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.E. (EAST OF I-405 & NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY) . SITE AREA: _ 1 .6 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 30.850 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air_ 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recre3tion c/ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS MITIGATED DNS I EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: 3 4:Y5 FORM 014 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING EEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 12, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 20, 1985 ECF - 095 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). CU-062-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT: RAMAC, INCORPORATED PROJECT TITLE: RAMAC SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING BRIEF DESCFIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTIUCTION OF A ONE & TWO STORY SELF-STORAGE BUILDING HAVING 30,850 SQUARE FEET OF AREA IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION:LOCATED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.E. (EAST OF I-405 & NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY) . SITE AREA: _ 1.6 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 30.850 SQ. FT. IMPACT REV]EW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air_ 3) Watei I) 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housng 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDA"ION: bi DNS MITIGATED DNS El EIS REVIEWED BY: cacti — G i TITLE: DATE: 1/S-i S FORM ##14 r ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1 t P C DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 12, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 20, 1985 ECF - 095 - 85 APPLICATIONN NO(s). CU-062-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT: RAMAC, INCORPORATED PROJECT TITLE: RAMAC SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING BRIEF DESCFIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTI'UCTION OF A ONE & TWO STORY SELF-STORAGE BUILDING HAVING 30,850 SQUARE FEET OF AREA IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION:LOCATED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.E. (EAST OF I-405 & NORTH OF API F_VAL1 EY HIGHWAY) . SITE AREA:__ 1.6 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 30.850 SQ, FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air_ 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Histcric and Cultural Preservation 14) Tran$portation 15) Public Services s 16) Utilities COMMENTS: TRenton F.%UT crIi((roDre .., i TEL 117/'L/DES 71/ ,o 7o tf C/Ei, ,r0 /Lc S/F62 zz AJT -7•--0 i vr//..0&--e- !//#e,O L.UG, ,4s' c agAr ITT, aml Ii 2 ''_987, V/.EE.d -7r) ,F f y y- , CA)/T7-g P,,e. Sr;e./.o.r_'L- .-,eS RECOMMENDATION: ri DNS yl MITIGATED DNS 1 EIS REVIEWED BY: abt7teet-) TITLE: 7` _e 7/.c&/%C DATE:c—„;)-O -- ,Yr- FORM #14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:k)()L-1,V - P PI. <- /\-'1— DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 12, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 20, 1985 ECF - 095 - 85 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(s). CU-062-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) r,ui 1 F; •Ni3b PROPONENT: RAMAC, INCORPORATED POLICY op/Pi OPM«a i ,FPT. PROJECT TIT_E: RAMAC SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTPUCTION OF A ONE & TWO STORY SELF-STORAGE BUILDING HAVING 30.850 SQUARE FEET OF APEA IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION:LOCATED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.E. (EAST OF I-405 & NORTH OF INI F VALLEY HIGHWAY) . SITE AREA: _ 1 .6 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 30,850 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Eartl, 2) Air_ 3) Watei 4) Plants 5) AnimEls 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use G 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare f L 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities L" COMMENTS: Ws gftnti-j20,4-a_.4)r4e. 64, 7„, c /.( fre,..,W„, OeAr-70.4e-e4Y1 646,, n'S 4s1,126:) ,A.Gt 1.4161-6a-- .444.4,7d„44,„....y c c ate e,44-€.42-'1 s, e, „el.; f' :1,"- V.Ve-Ca,;.ev-:trreCU RECOMMENDATION: Fr DNS n MITIGATED DNS 11 EIS REVIEWED BY: S ZUlilsrng TITLE: SSildt-m.]/ /.ch/t- DATE: lOg S FORM #14 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET C REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:ka F lc_ DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 12, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 20, 1985 ECF - 095 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). CU-062-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT: RAMAC, INCORPORATED PROJECT TITLE: RAMAC SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING BRIEF DESCFIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ONE & TWO STORY SELF-STORAGE BUILDING HAVING 30.850 SQUARE FEET OF AREA IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION:LOCATED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF BRONSON WAY N.E. (EAST OF I-405 & NORTH OF MAPLE VALl.EY HIGHWAY) . SITE AREA: 1,6 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 30.850 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air_ 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animels J 6) Energy and Natural Resources v 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) RecrEation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: .. T, /4-,- , („4S _ ..?_ f s`e=,,,,. g = d 6— •" Q1S/ Z 5-Itiv 44;4 facc . .SS /Le, NE 3 '1---dst--., t/z-i -4,-// -/ iSLze,„--..,,-17 4// i l eyT c z!a/y' Z0-c / j. e.,-71: ' "7- 7/ --,,_ s. --) A-L----QL--e / v,--,1 1.--------- ; -----9 / )41- 72--./ p--5 4?-, ,e--- 47 L/ ,Lioi 9 4,-),- 1 C;rf or VI, Vi RI 5' AUG 2 319,85 guu_omG,I ZONING DEPT' RECOI+ENDAT'Oh: Q DNS MITIGATED DNS 1 EIS REVIEWED BY: C'- -,2 '' f- TITLE: DATE:A/ , . // / -',3 FORM #14 0936N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects: VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK (ECF-018-85) Application for special permit, file SP-030-85, to allow the excavation of approximately 83,500 cubic yards of material as the required compensating flood storage for the pending fill permit, file SP-013-85; located on a 6.2 acre site south of S.W. 19th Street and between Raymond Avenue S.W. extended) and Longacres Race Track. BURGER KING CORPORATION (ECF-094-85) Application for building permit to allow the construction of a 3,300 square foot restaurant with a drive-through window, located at the northwest intersection of Sunset Boulevard North and North 3rd Street. RAMAC, INCORPORTED (ECF-095-85) Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a one and two story self-storage building having 30,850 square feet of area to be located in a B-1 zoned district, file CU-062-85; located at the 100 block of Bronson Way N.E. (east of I-405 and north of Maple Valley Highway) THE KENCO COMPANY (ECF-098-85) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a tilt-up building having approximately 27,360 square feet of warehouse space and 3,040 square feet of office space, SA-065-85; located on the west side of East Valley Road and approximately 820 feet south of the intersection of S.W. 27th Street. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by September 16, 1985. Published: September 2, 1985 Nielson( Smith Architects and Planners 9725 S.E.36th Street.Suite 404 Metter Island.Washer gtan 98040 206)232-5990 h : Zz/g7" j1-2•444ac' 8rdrzte. 911-- 14040 1)rry Ary a-444-4- I 2 arr o 1611:10:: lBD AUGD 5 n,3;7QEPT 17-770 1 ITY OF RENTC - FILE NO(S): • 4:(1({111: BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT C -O '` MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME j' S/, 1 /I,, FEES ADDRESSN Y O `/r4#/I PL ED REZONE*(FROM TO ED 74-35-SF `risr. C miz SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEARY PERMIT* Meiag/547y°1,,/S, .p yo40 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* 51„rf O TELEPHONE f Vl o 11 SITE PLAN APPROVAL C? ,) Z32_lO SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE* From Section: Justification Required NAME M1er-i7 VI,cson' 1. ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: cri T!6vfi•• O SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE FINAL PLAT 0 WAIVER Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: PA I IAG/ lam• I ADDRESS p,, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: P.o, 0 PRELIMINARY CITY pZIP a FINAL NZ t4 a7a.15/-7 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 4)•NZ"4-MI 0 Residential ED Industrial Commercial a Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS t t a7 5 WAY N.t 4 Q TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING ED PRELIMINARY A T 8-1 FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: 5 ‘C510 >;3d556,50.PF NUMBER OF SPACES: CEI ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 9 SQ. FT. ACRES AREA: 05 AO TOTAL FEES 7j0 CITY Of RLflTiiiITAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATEpilp EII APPLICATION RECEIVED BY:U1-1 11)APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: I\UG 81985 Eq Accepted Incomplete Notification Sent On By: BUILO(N(a/ ?NI 5 DEPT. _ GG qq' Initials) _ DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL APPLICATION DETERMINEDCTOVEDBE: BY. C,>-UO-En Sore& K. g J 12, - b) It, Accepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) ROUTED TO: Building Design Eng. Fire Parks jLL Police la Policy Dev. 10Traffic Eng. P Utilities ter REVISED ]-31 -Pa Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). 477/4a4V,. AFFIDAVIT I, Elli,?ar l.!/IG3cRJ being duly sworn, declare that I am nuhuric."id representative w act foruthe property owner, gd u.rnroi :,f the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 14 DAY OF UC..,I)ST 1956 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT 4j& 42r • i//G_ Name of Notary Public) Signature of Owner) c 04,4 6'12 e Address) Address) 90o5- City) State) (Zip) 3q Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 OF ECF: I I qt: © z City of Renton LU: Z n sal/ 0 e ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST [ le (1..Ep SEP1 UAUG81985 Purpose of Checklist: G ;;!. V\I,/TONING DEPT. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help 1.he agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. (.3overnmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description ;,.ou can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." 2omplete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark dE signations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to wiich you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impilcts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "thes not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJE(:;T ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be reed as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACk GROUND 1.Name of proposed project, if applicable: AFAMAC SELF-S ,2v/CC Sr0lr fGE, Baa$46. r2.Name of applicant: /e460,4 r hi S PMic c't s 3.Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 50 27riA51:45,a14 /a62 Aigt .g Z /S4'3-/J , k A 2.04) 'Z32--S7 o Airlizooirt 4.Date i::hecklist prepared: S,4c6,ST /fSS 5.Agency requesting checklist: C/7Y of gP.-(/7"oX1 6.Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Ccd//Srr2l/crov a0441 issuowce o47ur/-fl/A45 fi<P/r(4s. ' FWV/ fO/YrtL AEvr Y fart c,ar 6e.4),a2rire eik57/2€ 7?e y 2U, 4Pk-y Ri,e Fla aivitII frRepl' d12,y AdasmrcT7v. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions. expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes. explain. PJraRE PEl/E/. Four S j . ilM $¢C4/O ,E 5J/40/ Cu/2, . 'Ly /J,v/le ci M/7' 4472.074, Fr.M4jj Mi4UG/7/, s AJerf 1aE,(ray URA,/1r f1Zm5,.cJ7; B. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. ZuV/, U frAL ct/£r /sr r r4/1/l i s /a 4 ,a"Sonia /o/'A>014,9001, PR/vgivAY A,vo -02/tr-Fr'snhDY 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Or*0 46*rug)foe ally-434a4 aC 4ecair 01r oF•- ,W 7Y j/4cJ6 H4Pze 146W-AY 1#45114W R2J1 Ws +'. Ao.7. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. C.clR ( rAL iir) ZS'ii/t0416 J' zJ`1J'Z 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. 4N$1TIOCr 4 Amu Tito-5rn/aY 3a7so 54.,r 5T0 60 gtiatml6 wrrb trz/, *AY slap 170-1/44us. 7 S ARP2aQM 41e7-Y /(a Vat fl2 4 of 7I44Q'/1A'raro. 6.714c 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur ov,,r a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. c,27/4?,/ vc -ac Lars. #/oo,'//7 #/32. 04- /7/ 23,5; OWG e1ioA1y, 44. Lc Y71v 5a07H OP ado.802ah6or/ ii44'i'AMA/ A:Mr-air' 7#P- 1 7.5101e ac .z-4es COY of ArrAt VN, GN951! Zavizu6. 8-/. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 60% t. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. GL,Ausl[.. 77L L., d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. MO- 2 - e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. HjnWGr2 G,24co46. F/La./ 2aM Sue, t 2A'ao ow.Yac ro AfiL. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Y/X5 CLONAL, cue4Vors6 C'6Usr,2[1 Qot) 6V/LL j-1SUG71,4 izeivokAi wermi4ci $ .S6 2E OF yip's HAY, war lU 7L,L/R7,49Y7 ozwast OP 50/45- 1" Criern ,LL olsciip/A P11,1 il 'A 6'S !N/GL Ei%F2 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 77fI 4, Y Ea s/Or,t Cc t/zet ` /Mlvrr47"w1V 5)0704 Peiga6 et4451P007/04- 5*giti WATfQ p/Z,Ark646 S7:4friasE, Sys ,Lxir/uc a'e. Rr5rei; 4 Ds`44?; op P110114'J6 ,~. 2.AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. af6/ue 6/H4t1.5y; fr255484S p,ST FRM C445 LGY/ON. 7040,/1,B'Y M/tiol2 , MIs5/OA/S. HI Z -Wt fl6Y ONLY LY//L/Ak L - b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? AAP /i F,TEwWfty 4 latela Y/u€ G. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: WRY N A7s7 E(/a/•JJ 0..examaciles4, 3. WAT.ER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NC. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NO,vE. 3 - 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general deserion, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. NO. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site .lan. NO. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Grourk 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. IVO,No. 2) Descrsae waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industral, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. PA-Orr W/tA bit —,24 41 4iwmu op //`ri la s LswavAccs 4 SW/KO rtowtS fneM U 3')/LL PNer op 7t/,ESire. 14146r2 MIA-no/ 70 Vio 1-14- Premi,46,e Aroi sYS77M V/4 eat-Win' WI5>S/Dt aG 7f • Clus/>,-S Pfl', qz aG,(,EcncysI/Aomenew (55VV$7 '-1 WU farl'/AE 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. 5i19 t11O Wiesr5 Aorrozats 4N77 iP4l L fi5mc i'/iN az use d,f ny-eifr a9 EtP/pG. 4 - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 51o,/4f 14/ ON/Or`Yr oiV 5Y5T ! WCIi/fA OY//fi' CoA 1/?0-4F47 2Y5(4I4/a Wiz Mrn6A ras/i fPrlMTS. Rr/x/},07/46 OF G%i,B1 ,Aiws . 4. Plarts a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: aa' deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Shrubs, BinrtyVar., ram grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 6Cfai51Vr".6 44.577.(6 VF.ocrA-riiu A e-p c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. X b t1r/e)i h/it/, 5/To/145,8OU C'ti -P A a/ CMAJ5 V >' !t) d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 0/2.645r4:Ilic.6 84NIG5 AfPREIPEP Wr#6ereAJ DVOc/5 72E04 =>H/waS C N,D C/Y ' /f 1-4Wireler 42 s• 1z< Pt-AATiA.16 ,BErts. 5.Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other 5y i/ru-a'R/2S. Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other J200r/iTS Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NOIUg. K WN c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. 5 - d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, it any: G?SG Y445 HX01 / 4d. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. a -772I NAZ 646, F Y/ 9 ("1 FUG w«G BO WV Dtlia. ' Co rnrctsosr. a c. F t' F,e 1-4.17 ric.6 o trig&ku,136 10E0 lxi601.v6 oPeiztVoise e 77IE FK/UTY. V laid aNFg6 y 115 ,4W74P b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. ND. 9IiiDi4.6 rYItG SIP Na 74P/ F l/Wet/2nrS. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Nhf ai " r 41077u6 OXTu/a s, flwattaeauf A<ru - / 74.E cwvy iN 4 11.E 44006W 4,1Cis%. Ply La160• 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. PaiVO i/Cirefel . 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N0 PAR 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Na uf ifAinc1P,4T, . 6 - 2) What types and levals of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 7 /2,L1 AJcW / ',/ G'ix/57/2640714 ( r t//7lE5. So124t,JG s 7147)1 /,u P W7 smai,oqipc.02747x.- 1/04Y Z/774E A.L7S 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: L46Q6CAPe FUVU s. 1 J/4U/24L ai5C .47/4y geippieg BUfllli+6 /L j7j v$ES UCd AzI va,4'YS 7b ea' May Ay77077 , 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? V O MAV. f't9227M 1 Gl 66 / 71f-01gb1z1'f/ b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. i/o. c. Describe any structures on the site. N/A. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. CC, i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 2 ktectio leeShce/ G' Mr-bur U/LLYM j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 7 - 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NONE b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 1` We 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 24' 01X1./?e -vie 0 Gvety b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? 40. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: i-AM SCAgpj PLAXMA.6. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? 5 Nr, in0h64,Li'rn 644120 F>7444 FAIRKa dazioxu 4Y LJc 1?77i. E,(ccosEp IA)aJ/aYos 7a CcrAv- cE HAI/Ly a I Al47,441.65 A AWAHAI6's. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NO. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? AtorxexiT meemy 57/z er L H71 6 -7 o H 0.47/Ts. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: LANOCCAP a//GS —,(1 rArti1u 04S71 (/ar/177e d 5-1 ,Eoil M. - /iE374P C//T-FG 1 AP4 LA/Mk6 f kvv s. 8 - 12. RecrE:ation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? 1C ig b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO. P2//meps L'444A-7' !-Bt AJ1 zims- c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: PE 2 , z,4-c/ PiITN Aa2dss 517E /Z1421R* few° /Ai/,gy. Bi17 z WAY 7i112L 812/24' V,,/65. 13. Histo:•ic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. WAI b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. sk A) i M WN c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: J1l2 . 14. Trans;)ortation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. er-00)454.4441 N, VA• N,E: 3te sr; meite k,V- ey?WI/tow. Ar_Cpal.5 7Z rCIST. 57?zr .S SY N'k/a2 VEW,4" ta Ac. a-5 -rD ---418: b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? 09( 7b B0.5 STOP_ c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 2/, NoAir d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe indicate whether public or private). MMP/201/EMtA r 7b ae EiaNsav WAY N. f y2/t ew/v 71491.1 i uctu Da. /P1P2eI/4 4/t5 7b Vail 490 ‘,1W etivl/2a- av MAAPhr(/.6tay litG/M44 9 - e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NO. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. O,viwWN. ma EvpW S—IrJ1 Al PrAK 7?Z,9FR spas P2 sine-ea g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: udNE A•& W#3L j. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. WM/M/quog/A Q IA)04149/vK >at U& 72VKs b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. P4COUa4 slfrY 4-S y tl 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: (electricit(natural ga' cWilerfefuse servi9) __.elephone a itaary sewer septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. OLOctilic Pacer gr-rsat— vAl G45 WASH, Nffr.6,45 fleggo NW.gra_ WATER- 121i41 I c rY 4414.5e402--k u'tgµtr7y. S70/2/4 C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: i'l, i?i7`1 P. Alel.Sa 1 . 10 - 176 11-8-84 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans andprograms. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them inconjunctionwiththelistoftheelementsoftheenvironment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the typesofactivitieslikelytoresultfromtheproposal, would affect the item at a greaterintensityoratafasterratethaniftheproposalwerenotimplemented. Respondbrieflyandingeneralterms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production ofnoise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areasorareasdesignated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; suchasp;rrks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered specieshabitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Propcsed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 11 - 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: 12 - Those portions a Southwest 1/4 of tlin Northeast 1/4 ofSection17, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , describedasfollows: - Parcel "A" : Commencing at the intersection of the centerlinesoftheoldRenton-Issaquah Road, now Bronson Way North, andtheRenton-Maple Valley Road, now SR 169, running thence S 41 °25' 00" E along the centerline of said Renton-Maple Valley Road371. 14 feet, said point being S 41°25 ' 00" E 393. 97 feet from the intersection of the centerline of said Renton-Maple ValleyRoadwiththemonumentlineofBronsonWay, westerly of thisintersection, produced easterly; thence N 48°35 ' 00" E 25 feettotheeasterlymarginofsaidRenton-Maple Valley Road; thenceS41°25 ' 00" E 150 feet; thence N 48°35 ' 00" E 90 feet to the TruePointofBeginningofthisdescription; thence continuing N 48°35' 00" E 184. 10 feet; thence N 7°40' 00" W to an intersectionwiththestatehighwayrightofwaybearingN50°26 ' 30" E anddistant60feetfromthecenterlineofthe "H" line, an on-ramptofuturePrimaryStateHighwayNo. 1 (SR 405) ; thence S 50°26'30" W along said state highway right of way to an intersectionwithalinebearingN41°25 ' 00" W from the true point of begin- ning; thence S 41°25' 00" E along said line 50. 00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Parcel "B" : Beginning at a point N 89°45' 17" W 1896. 90 feet and N 1°11 ' 00" E 383. 21 feet of the east quarter corner of said Section 17; thence N 1°11' 00" E 323. 23 feet to a point west ofthenorthlineofLot10, Block 1, Plat of Monterey Terrace,Volume 50, page 36; thence S 88°49' 00" E 10 feet; thence N 1°11' 00" E 287. 61 feet; thence on a curve to the left with a radiusof360feetthroughanangleof14 ° a distance of 87. 97 feet; thence N 12°49 ' 00" W 183. 90 feet to the southerly margin ofBronsonWayNorth; thence along said southerly margin S 25°18'00" N 74 . 13 feet; thence S 81°58 ' 00" W 279. 43 feet; thence S 07° 23' 29" E 242. 74 feet; thence S 48°52 ' 32" W 118. 77 feet; thence S 41°07 ' 29" E 599. 64 feet to the point of beginning. Less state .highway. Parcel "C" : Beginning at a point N 89°45 ' 17" W 50 feet from the southwest corner of the Plat of Monterey Terrace, Volume 50, page36; thence N 89°45 ' 17" W to the northeasterly margin of Renton- Maple Valley Road; thence N 41°07' 29" W 642. 80 feet; thence N 48°52 ' 32" E 150 feet; thence S 41°07 ' 29" E to a point 50 feet westofthewestlineofsaidPlatofMontereyTerrace; thence south- erly along said west line to the point of beginning. Except the southeasterly 100 feet of the northwesterly 251. 74 feet thereof. And Less State highway. 1 CITY OF REECJTTOON ran-P i.? 1'•'D CITYORENTON UU I UG 8 1985 rid is W I BUILDING/ZONING OF' PLAY 61985 SUI ii l -Li. •:i?vim LET'' C rder No . G-397297-2 EXHIBIT "A" A pc#rtion of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 17 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East , W.M. , in King County, described as follows : Commencing at the East 1/4 corner of Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W.M. , thence North 88°45 ' 17" West, 1325 . 83 feet , to the 1/16 corner; thence North 1 11' 00" East 252 . 22 feet ; thence North 89°45 ' 17" West , 653 . 91 feet , to the Northeasterly margin of the Renton-N8ple Valley Road.; thence North 41 07 ' 29" Wesb 391 . 06 feet , to the true point of beginning; thence continuing North 41 07' 29" West , 100 . 00 feet ; thence North 48°52 ' 31" East , 150 . 00 feet ; thence South 41°07' 29" East , 100. 00 feet ; thence South 48°52' 31" West , 150 . 00 feet , to the true point of beginning ; EXCEPT that portion thereof condemned in Superior Court Cause No . 531554 , for Primary State Highway No. 1 ; AND EXCEPT that portion thereof Deeded to the State of Washington for Highway purposes under Auditor' s File No. 720407-0324. END OF EXHIBIT "A" CITY Or RENTON IMEMRY/ MAY 6 1985 D PUJLDING/.C:NiNG GEPT. CITY 1-15nPTNnnt°fi RENTON Liti AUG 81985 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. CITY OF RENTON Conditional Use Permit Application for: AUG 81985 RAMPC SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BUILDING Old Bronson Way North @ I-405 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, Renton , Washington Jusification: a. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use is allowed by conditional use in the B-1 zone per section 4-711 20. A. It shoLld therefore be compatible with the standards of the Comprehensive Plan when approved by the Hearing Examiner. b. Community Need: The facility fills a void in self- service storage facilities between south Renton (East Valley Road) and Factoria. The proponent feels there exists a need for storage services for the residents of north and east Renton as well as Fairwood , Maple Valley and Newport Hills. New apartment construction in these areas will only increase the need for storage. c. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The building should have a m: nor adverse effect on adjacent properties. One of the apartments north of the proposal is owned by this owner. The proposal is almost not visible from the other apartment. Res: dents in Monterey Terrace may be able to look down on the facility but their view is generally screened by the heavily wooded steep hillside below their properties. This wooded screen would not be modified. Properties to the west and south are screened by highways and vacant land. d. Compatibility: The building is designed to have a generally apartment residential scale and appearance to be compatible with the adjacent apartment properties. The site has a generally freeway oriented environment but is well screened from the single-family properties of Monterey Ter -ace. e. Parking: Parking at the rate of 1 : 1500 is provided by the 21 spaces shown. f . Traffic: Traffic generated by a storage facility should be quite low and during non-peak traffic hours. The building is served off a private driveway which would get traffic off public streets. The driveway aon Maple Valley Higlway has been designed and studied for office park traffic volumes greatly exceeding this proposal . Traffic volumes from Old Bronson Way North should be no problem except for potential turning movements from N. E. 3rd Street. The proponent is willing to upgrade Old Bronson Way North with paving, curb , gutter and sidewalk to facilitate increased traffic generated. g. Noise, Glare: Noise, light and glare impacts from this proposal should be minor within the general environment of the I-405 freeway noise, light and glare. Residential properties will be screened by vegetation and terrain as at present. With all the activities enclosed in a building shell the noise, light and glare from the proposal should be greatly reduced. h. Landscaping: The owner proposes to install landscaping around the building to present an attractive commercial appearance. This includes street trees, evergreen trees and shrubs, ground covers and bark covered planting beds. Landscape screening of adjacent properties should not be required. i . Accessory Uses: N/A. j . Conversion: N/A. k. Public Improvements: The owner is aware of the need to ins'_all a waterline loop with hydrants, side sewers, stormwater retention/detention systems, temporary erosion con"::rol systems, traffic turn-lane improvements on Maple Valey Highway, and general improvements of Old Bronson Way North as a part of his development. Building Signs: The owner would propose to install illuminated building signs; one over the building main entrance and one or two on the freeway side of the building in accordance with City of Renton sign regulations. San:iblasted wood freestanding signs at each street entrance to the driveway would be proposed. Nielson & Smith, Architects 7435 S. E. 27th Street Box 1062 Mercer Island , Washington 98040 206) 232-5990 6 August 1985 Photometric Data CITATION SERIES Type III CT3-250H PS-F 250W HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM ' 4141111116111PP- ItSINGLE/FLAT LENS TWIN/FLAT LENS 4MH 3MH7....,7,,, 4„......-.---%,......f- illill 2MH 7r1I-- --'"-------r 1MH CL / illbdilli 0 A B A , C/ / 1MH C B p D 2MH E F F G H 3MH G H FRONT FRONT 4MH 3MH 2MH 1MH 0 1MH 2MH 3MH 4MH 3MH 2MH 1MH 0 1MH 2MH 3MH 4MH Mounting Configuration Foot Candle Values For The Following Curves Height A B C D E F G H 10' Single 22.00 11.00 5.50 2.20 1.10 .55 .22 .11 Twin 44.00 21.60 11.00 4.50 2.20 1.10 .45 .22 12'Single 15.30 7.60 3.80 1.50 .76 .38 .15 .08 Twin 30.50 15.30 7.80 3.10 1.50 .78 .31 .15 14'Single 11.20 5.60 2.80 1.10 .56 .28 .11 .06 Twin 22.40 11.20 5.70 2.20 1.10 .57 .22 .11 16'Single 8.60 4.30 2.10 .86 .43 .21 .09 .04 Twin 17.20 8.60 4.40 1.70 .86 .44 .17 .09 18' Single 6.80 3.40 1.70 .68 .34 .17 .07 .03 Twin 13.50 6.80 3.40 1.40 .68 .34 .13 .07 20'Single 5.50 2.80 1.40 .55 .28 .14 .06 .03 Twin 11.00 5.50 2.80 1.10 .55 .28 .10 .05 22' Single 4.50 2.30 1.10 .45 .23 .11 .05 .02 Twin 9.10 4.50 2.30 .91 .45 .23 .08 .04 24'Single 3.80 1.90 .95 .38 .19 .09 .04 .02 Twin 7.60 3.80 1.90 .76 .38 .19 .07 .03 26' Single 3.30 1.60 .81 .33 .16 .08 .03 .02 Twin 6.50 3.30 1.70 .65 .33 .17 .06 .03 28'Single 2.80 1.40 .70 .28 .14 .07 .03 .01 Twin 5.60 2.80 1.40 .56 .28 .14 .05 .03 30' Single 2.40 1.20 .61 .24 .12 .06 .03 .01 Twin 4.90 2.40 1.20 .49 .26 .12 .04 .02 CITY OF RENTON MH-Mounting Height r D AUG 8 1985 Iiflbull9 SUSEEIIIS IOC. BUI D NGI'LC.'1Ip.6 v: ...4201 Malsbary • P.O. Box 42419 • Cincinnati,Ohio 45242. 513)793-3200 LSI-CT4-6/84 CT-4 LENDING OF FILE FILE TITLE 4:1V6iti°L27#4d°