Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA85-103I fyp cnl CoNs7¢uc7leu: cols it---it---4s' 1-I¢jAI ¢.Teecie 51d,09 be..ie ..I &. N6W ASp11 P1{ pgvEMC Nj Mtjnl RueG.''zj 9e1W w cp1oR.. 1q-4," SIIel.xj dootS Couc¢eTe V100., SIRES EAST ElevApe.s of 45'.10o hA.q AR 6,3.14 out ScAle I"= 20' N0TE: A- C1n0TRUCTIOAv VeTA115 4 IJecesSAe9 ¢uglteee. dceal s will be. I.,e1 l+uded .0 41,e. co...0,0'e. o II 1 1 e' I SeT de XS 10e. 'by DePT. I I 1*.---zlo' A,i.ujic. ny - -I. 4- -v. r n 02. EAST E/evAT,eu o{ 5 AA.yAR bu.161.x, ScAle I'= 20' 46' •loci Nevi H..,yAA A 1 oRrH 1e Fen. LSs.-R 100, E..s7'u.1 ?.'- I -°T Aj A.acaPRT su,*, As 400 SERIES b. 1 loci CESS..IAS AND TyR1p p}opS I TI- I q b" A --s r r r e— booble yellow Ilue\ y Neer, Elswjpne e'F 45'= Ioo' hwgPR bu'Idl.3T O Sonic I"=20' 196.2q' De.•bl. „JI. r Iie 1 I. e Q z_esT..4 I 77:A6G4 5,50 If1s- 6"7{ euco le—3Z--1 I r__— T—— — T 12.E I IA— a I___ raeeTN E/evATma o f 5 1,A.pAe bulla'.'9 I- r i I— 1 Sonic ,"• zo' I I I I I L_ T_ J L _J L_ 1 I L_ - - -L -- L--J , • l I?o551b!. csnvee. hA.t9AR bu,ld.ri.1 ke Mel yALasoalNS_3 u,Iel las 48'• .47' Fot'. "FA.achcre- FlywAy5 New'Asp1,.1 el B R E. pl,ckEL Co.tT Co, e p.ve.neur Ems T,uy '6...1d,"S N. y L.o. 3 RE M1 CC. 21734, MS'o: TZJICab ee sw14e\ I OC.TobER 1985 I I Re vi t-a 1)ECEAvbec 1985 I SMEBT I er 1 seas" eT 5 4 s z I n• 1 z 10' Y r 224.8z' 3•4 „ a/ 'P107 FPIAIS w—•—r x— SC Pk I 20' Fr.,sT,.x) NydeAaT r.,s TluI 4euee. Re AdwAl Y The Widest Choice Makes HANGARs to you, probably, is the fact that Fulfab T-Hangars can be ASSEMBLE, panels are lifted into place, attached to the ir iitiPILII-Alti fri_ erected by almost any available labor and can be dismantled foundation and bolted to the adjacent connecting members. and moved if necessary. No special tools are needed. for safe, adaptable, economical storage are Fulfab T-Hangars are pre-engineered and quantity pro- FULL NESTED PLAN USES SHORTER TAXIWAY a Fulfab specialty. We have expanded our duced for low cost.All steel component parts are sure-fitting.Where building length is limited, or where taxiways must be AIRCRAFT NosHANGARS range of sizes to provide shelter for most You may add more units to lengthen the hangar at any time kept short, the Fulfab FULL NESTED "T" uses space to best popular private planes. Models and dimensions of Fulfab without difficulty. Complete foundation and erection plans advantage. You can "store more planes per lineal foot." T-Hangars are easy to compare in the charts on the back are furnished prior to shipment of material. PANELIZED page. DESIGN greatly simplifies and speeds the enclosing of walls Our design and fabrication methods have made Fulfab and partitions. Nearly all the sidewall materials may be as- T-Hangars the standard of the industry. Equally important sembled into panels in the flat prior to erection. QUICK TO First Choice WINTERIZED for "Snow Country" GALVANIZED for Long-Run Savings Mt - FULFAB gives you a very generous overhang of the roof COST OF UPKEEP is a vital consideration. That's why gal- sheets, shedding drippage far out from the doors, minimiz-vanized exterior walls and roof are standard on Fulfab T- Hangars. Our buildings are UNIQUE in that most of the r a+r ing freezeup problems. Mini-slot bottom guides for doors g g 6.-,, xx.. reduce friction and contribute to trouble free operation. structural members such as purlins, girts, door track, door 000.- frames, center columns, etc. are alsomade of galvanized 0 g'— It is important to check up on the way hangars have per-. 4 .,`" 0 — steel. formed in an environment comparable to your locale. We you have old T-Hangars at your field, you will appreci- can direct you to nearby fields where Fulfab T-Hangars give ate the superior durability and good looks of galvanized e" 's " s the most satisfactory service in difficult freezing weather. Fulfab "structurals." 1 •. t,„s r1 ie... 111 r w• LiplialeCZNIIIIIa 3 w i 11111111111100"— Note how roof dripwoispi---- 1 47 SLIDING DOORS clears door guides!Electric Power-Lift BI-FOLD DOORS are factory assembled into large panels. Each sliding sec-DELUXE "push button convenience" is offered on four Ful-9 tion is carried on top roller bearings which ride on non-fab models(two OT's and two LK's)which have doors raised 416 fouling monorail track. The leaves are kept steady and true or lowered by 34 H.P. motor and self-braking worm gear. along the bottom by intermittent guides. Select the models that meet your need COLORS AVAILABLE I! t#mow i FOR WALL & DOOR SHEETING n size... door style...unit line-up 10, 11,14 --„amposi - t___ i. 7*- li y;3„' r'" Sliding door leaves come BEIGE WHITE BLUE R "` to site ready to hang• i k. iI Hangar Information Guide BOTH STANDARD "T" & FULL NESTED "T" are available in any number of units I. STANDARD "T" FULL NESTED "T" I ' OFFICE NO. 2 NO. 4 B-= NO. 2 NO. 4 B 1 D i-E D C 1- I CLEAR'I g II i;'I NO. 1 NO. 3 k-CLEAR B III µ 1.A NO. 1 NO. 3 OFFICE II ! 1. CLEAR WIDTH L I-A t rCLEAR WIDTH { IIIII1j i, CLEAR CLEAR SLIDING MODEL A B D E HEIGHT SLIDING MODEL A B C D E HEIGHT DOORS LT-42 41'-8" 16' 32' 20'-8" 11'-7" DOORS LT-42N 41'-8" 16' 16' 48' 20'-8" 11'-7' r WITH OT-42 41'-8" 16' 32' 20'-8" 12'-0" WITH LK-42* 41'-8" 18' 14' 50' 20'-8" 12'-0" BI-FOLD OT-44 43'-8" 20' 40' 21'-8" 14'-0" BI-FOLD LK-44* 43'-8" 20' 18' 58' 21'-8" 14'-0" DOORS OT-48 47'-8" 20' 40' 23'-8" 14'-0" DOORS LK-48 47'-8" 20' 18' 58' 23'-8" 14'-0" w LK-42 and LK-44 previously called LK-3 and LK-4 respectively. BUILDING LENGTHS FOR VARIOUS NUMBERS OF UNITS HANGAR NUMBER OF UNITS EACH ADD'L MODEL ENDWALL DIM. 2 4 5 6 8 10 12 14 UNIT-ADD SLIDING DOORS FULFABLT4232' 73'i' 136'.'z' 168' 199';2` 262': ' 3251/2' 3881/2' 4511/2' 311' LT42N 48' 63'105' 126' 147'189' 231' 273' 315' 21' BI-FOLD DOORS 41 AIRCRAFT Igl HANGARS LK42 50' 63'105' 126' 147'189' 231' 273' 315' 21' LK44 58' 66'110' 132' 154' 198' 242' 286' 330' 22' LK48 58' 72'120' 144' 168' 216' 264' 312' 360' 24' OT42 32' 73'h' 1361/2' 168' 199' ' 262./2' 3251/2' 388' ' 45112' 311/2'The Modern Answer in Aircraft T- Hangars 0744 40' 77'143' 176' 209' 275' 341' 407' 473' 33' OT48 40' 84'156' 192' 228' 300' 372' 444' 516' 36' STANDARD "T" vs FULL-NESTED "T" Since the cost of a Standard "T" versus Full-Nested "T" is The Standard "T" configuration produces a building that is nar- essentially the same for material and erection, the final choice row and long. It has the advantage of being the simplest config- depends on the best utilization of the land area. 11 uration and using the minimum office or storage space. This astoragespaceisoftenwastedandthereforeitiseconomicaltoSLIDINGDOORvsBI-FOLD DOOR r -- r, minimize it. In the sliding door hangars the standard "T" allows Sliding door hangars have proved to be the most economical an-2 CITY OF fEN1ONanysetofdoorstobeopenedwithoutcompromisingadjacentswerforprovidingadequateaircraftstorage. The cost of sliding hangars. This standard "T" also fits well into plots that have door models is considerably less than the bi-fold models.Our top previously been set aside by master planning. roller intermittent bottom guide door system has proved itself 4t 11 Z l ' S r DTheFull-Nested "T" constitutes a hangar that is wider but cor- many times even in the most severe snow country. Construction Z w:,..404 respondingly shorter since it occupies nearly the same area. It is simpler and mechanical and electrical problems are eliminated. DEC 1 3 1985 reduces taxiway costs substantially. The office or storage areas Sliding doors are the answer for that large majority of airports are somewhat larger which is an advantage if they are used. that cannot demand the big city rental rates. The sliding door hangars that are full nested are designated by The electrically operated bi-fold doors are unquestionably lZUNING DEBT the suffix"N"as in the LT42N.This model enjoys the advantages desirable. A button is easier to push than a door.They are recom- listed above for full nested hangars but is slightly compromised mended for people who use their planes frequently or can other- wisebythefactthateachsetofdoorshastoslideinfrontoforbehind justify the substantially increased rental rates. neighboring doors. f i ii FULFAB FULFAB, INC. AIRCRAFT HANGARS 1525 WHIPPLEPPLE AVE. S.W. • BOX 1365 CANTON OHIO 44 708 PHONE 216 - 477-7211 1525 WHIPPLE AVE. S.W. • BOX 1365 • CANTON, OHIO 44708 • 216-477-7211 Manufacturer reserves the right to make changes without notice in price,design models and specifications. 10-81 anduni A. a Neiw . IN 1 storage. Vee Neal Aviation, LaTrobe, Pennsylvania There's no better way to be sure top-guided door system that centers, Atlantic can custom your next hangar meets your features specially machined, design your hangar to allow for exact needs than with an Atlantic grooved wheels that glide easily any of the support services you hangar system. From small "T" along solid steel rails. It's a may require; including: office hangar units to large clear-span superior door system design space, parts and equipment service hangars, Atlantic has the that assures dependable, storage, maintenance and experience and capability to trouble-free operation. repair, as well as sales and m provide you with an attractive, display areas. f economical building that will Custom Design Capability.The possibilities are truly 4,__._____ reflect your demand for quality. Atlantic's ability to custom unlimited with a hangar system design hangar facilities has from Atlantic.The Door System Makes The been proven time and time Difference. again. From the smallest single- Atlantic hangars are aircraft hangars to mammothgarcgo equipped with a bottom-rolling, flight testing and service Bartow Municipal Airport, Bartow,Florida Police Helicopter Hangar,Jacksonville, Florida Bartow Municipal Airport, Bartow, Florida White County Airport, Sparta,Tennessee I AM ki,,... it t Y• • li ii. li J`1 wow I U 1 1 J.n-Bagley Bait Company-Winter Haven Florida s 11 4 1 1"-., - ) ti.ih,,,, , - r-- —Th , Sikorsky Development Flight Test Center, West Palm Beach,Florida 44, a,-. f 4—_^&:' s. A its- a,= sue• a 4 4V r E 4111 I 1ICJ ,tter ter. f y• V yy i Vey »'. i 1) SW3ITNO. I BUILDINGS FOR aim t at , II 0 aircraft hand BUILDINGS FOR re E . aircraft hangarr DEC 1: N:EP T. isimminsimmummameinumr amid.. mia Iyr a o AL ice v cPrvAk.. Your authorized Atlantic struction. He can assist builder is a professional.you with the layout and 7".. I 1 He has a thorough knowl- design of your building, or edge of local building he'll work closely with your codes and is experienced architect to help solve your I in building systems con- building problems. ObUllding Systems,inc. A I 7, 111' 1 P.O.Box 82000/Atlanta,Georgia 30366/(404)447-9010 A Subsidiary of Atlantic Steel Company 411t- i As..- a. tiatrpilitaris- i i a it anticbuildingsystems,inc. BEGINNING OF FILE E T' MICRORL 4/7/6/itinai( 403 - 85 e NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Ev iro° WASHINGTON Environmental Review C mittee ERC) has issued a declaration of non- significance for the following project: Audrey' IJedo:.e FANCHER FLYWAYS (ECF-121-85)being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of two aircraft hangar buildings having approximately 6,720 square feet and 4,500 square feet VALLEY NEWSPAPERS respectively to house 7 aircraft in a P-1 zoned district, file number CU-103-85; property located at 243 West Perimeter Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News Road on the Renton Municipal Airport. The Environmental Review Committee Daily newspapers p iblished six (6) times a week.That said newspapers ERC) has issued a declaration of non- significance for the following projects with are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six additional conditions imposed as mitigat- months prior to the c ate of publication referred to,printed and published ing measures under their authority of Section 4-2822(D)of the Renton MunicipalintheEnglishlanguagecontinuallyasdailynewspapersinKent, King Code: County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal BRYANT MOTORS, INC. (ECF-104-85) newspapers by orde -of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Application to rezone 8,240 square feet of property from R-1, Single Family Resi- King County. dential,to B-1, Business Use,file number R-079-85, property located 125 and 125 Meadow Avenue North;and application for The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News variance from Section 4-711(D)(6)to allow a reduction of required landscaping along Journal , Daily Record Chronicle A , Daily Globe News , (and Meadow Avenue North and North Second not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its Street from 10 feet to 3 feet,file number V- subscribers duringthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice a ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LI- v o t i e e of Environmental De t Armn i n d t l on MITED PARTNERSHIP(ECF-119-85) was published Application for site plan approval to allow on January 13 , 1986 i 1 3_13 the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site,file number SA-100-85; property located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LI- sum of $41 • b MITED PARTNERSHIP (ECF-124-85) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on the 10.48 acres of property, file number SA- 106-85;property located on the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning 1 L' Department, Municipal Building, Renton, r7Subscribedandsworntobeforemethis_ CI of Jan 19 86 . Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by January 27, 1986. CITY F Published in the Daily Record ChronicleOF •TC,'d i r January 13, 1886, R1313 IL APR 1 Notary Public for the State of Washington, 8(I residing at Federal Way, r I Jrl King County, Washington. tubtBALeAA.• 11, f LA it 6 OF R.44 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 NAL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR o LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 5)co- FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235 -25930, 9gTD SEPSE‘4‘C3 P March 1 1, 1986 Bob Mickel 9244 N.E. 13th Street Bellevue, Washington, 98004 RE: File No. CU-103-85; Fancher Flyways Dear Mr. Mickel: The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published on February 24, 1986 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feEl free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK:dk 1188E cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of King DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on ' the 24th day of February 1986 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this r' day of .1% 7 1986 2E) - Notary P ad f r the State of Washington, residing at therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: CU-103-85 - Fancher Flyways , Inc. The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) 1179E February 24, 1986 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. FILE NO. CU-103-85 LOCATION: 243 West Perimeter Road at the Renton Municipal Airport. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of two aircraft hangar buildings having approximately 6720 sq. ft. and 4500 sq. ft. respectively to house seven aircraft on property zoned P-1. SUMMARY (JF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approved with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTME=NT REPORT: received by the Examiner on February 4, 1986. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearirg was opened on February 11, 1986, at 9:05 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documents pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan. Exhibit #3 - For illustrative purposes only, brochure showing full fab 6700 sq. ft. building to be utilized. Exhibit #4 - For illustrative purposes only, brochure by Atlantic showing the proposed 4500 sq. ft. building. Presenting a review of the proposal was Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator. He set out such information as the 1.65 acre of property is to be used to add two aircraft hangar buildings to house seven aircraft. Utility plans will have to be approved and improved for the subject area, and the Fire Department noted there will need to be provisions for access to the inside hangar area from West Perimeter Road. The water main system to be utilized must provide 3 fire hydrants at locations to be approved by that department. The present hydrants are not properly located and are the property of the Boeing Company. Mr. Blaylock stated the Building Department is requesting a fire wall be provided on the west building near the office. No other buildings are permitted within 40 ft. of these buildings without exterior walls. Approved grading and drainage plans will have to be approved by the City, the proposal complies with the criteria to be considered for a Conditional Use, the project is compatible, meets the height and bulk requirements of the zoning classification, is similar in function and use, there is a demand for this use, traffic circulation will not be modified, noise and glare will be no greater than those now at the airport, and landscaping will be moderately provided. Mr. Blaylock continued stating the existing parking lot may not meet City standards for dimensions and requirements but the Code does not specifically set out parking requirements for aircraft hangars. Usually in small aircraft operations the owner of the aircraft may park their car under the wing of the aircraft, move the aircraft and then park the car where the aircraft was located. Fancher Flyways, Inc. CU-103-85 February 24, 1986 Page 2 Mr. Blaylock advised it was staff's feeling that this method of parking would be acceptable to the City, and no special parking arrangement need be pursued for parking at the hangars. Continuing, Mr. Blaylock referred to a letter from the Public Works Director stating both of the Perimeter Roads are not public streets but are a private access to the airport. This means no setbacks are required on the Perimeter Roads. Public access to the airport is off Rainier Avenue, the adjacent parking lot should be upgraded to meet City standards, and staff supports the recommendation for approval of this proposal. Calling for testimony from the applicant or their representative, responding was: Bob Mickel 9244 N.E. 13th Bellevue, Washington, 98004 Mr. Mickel s tated he feels the report presented was adequate and fair but questioned the requirement of additional fire hydrants by the Fire Department questioning why the additional protection is being required since they are not increasing the number of aircraft or people on the site. The buildings are essentially non-flammable, and if the site is not adequately protected now, he feels it may be the responsibility of the City to upgrade anc protect their investment. The applicant is only asking to build hangars for aircraft that are currently using the site. Mr. Blaylock stated he could not address the Fire Department requirements but felt they were based on established City Codes for the construction of new buildings. The Hearing Examiner stated the applicant should work with the Fire Department at the time they obtain the building permit with regard to the additional ' ire hydrants and the placement of water mains. It was clarified that there would not be landscaping at the rear of the western or northern hangars, and Mr. Mickel stated the existing landscaping in the existing parking lot and the area around the existing office building should prove sufficient to conform with the City requirements. The area north of tt-e existing building is paved in gravel, the area to the east is a combination of gravel, grass, etc. so there should be no need for further gravel work at this time. The Heari ig Examiner called for further testimony, there was no one else wishing to speak in fEivor of or in opposition to this matter. Wishing to comment on the lease for this property, representing staff was: Vince Lee Public Works Coordinator City of Renton Mr. Lee E dvised the lease on this property has already been signed and has no conditions attached to it. The proposal for the development of these hangars was presented to, and approved by the Aviation Committee and the City Council, subject only to the provision that all administrative procedures be followed. This hearing is a part of those procedures. Mr. Lee stated it was the initiative of Fancher Flyways, Inc. to place the hangars on this property, and this development is highly encouraged by the City. If a Conditional Use Permit could not be issued it would only mean that the hangars could not be built ,it this time, but the lease would not be affected at all. It is felt hangar space is needed on this area and again. Mr. Lee stated this proposal has the full support of the Aviation Committee and the City. There being no further testimony or comments from staff, the hearing was closed at 9:35 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Fancher Flyways, Inc., has requested approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of two aircraft hangar buildings at the Renton Municipal Airport. 2.The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered in the record as Exhibit #1. Fancher Flyways, Inc. CU-103-85 February 24, 1 c.+86 Page 3 3. Pursuart to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971, Es amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5.The subject site is located at the extreme southwest corner of the airport at 243 West Perimeter Road. 6.An existing building and unpaved surface are located at the site. 7.The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of public and quasi-public uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. The Airport Plan obviously suggests activities supportive of aviation. 8.The subject site is zoned P-1 (Public/Quasi-Public). 9.The applicant proposes constructing two separate hangar buildings. The larger building will be approximately 6,720 square feet, while the smaller building will be approximately 4,500 sq ft. Seven aircraft will be housed in the two facilities. 10. The structures are metal prefabricated buildings. The buildings will be approximately 20 feet high (smaller building) and 13 feet high. 11. The Fire Department has indicated that the current fire flow water supply is not star dard. Fire Department approval will be required of all fire flow and hydrant requirements. 12. Building and Zoning recommended parking at the ratio of 1 stall for every 200 feet of office space. Parking for hangars is generally provided by the airplane storage location. 13. The applicant will be paving the unpaved areas of the site. 14. The applicant has secured a lease from the City, and any improvements made to the property are made solely at the applicant's request. They are not required as part of the lease nor was the lease contingent upon the subject proposal. CONCLUSIONS 1.The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, will not impair the public health, safety and welfare, and in addition, is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-748(C) which p:•ovides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking will not occur in required side yards and that traffic movement and circulation will be safe; f. Noise, light and glare will not be adverse; g. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use; h. Adequate public services are available and will not be burdened by the proposal. The requested conditional use appears justified and is approved. Fancher Flyways, Inc. CU-103-85 February 24, 1`186 Page 4 2.Many of the criteria for a Conditional Use Permit are not entirely applicable to a use located at the airport. The airport is a distinct property, and while some off-situ impacts can be anticipated, they are not unusual for an airport location. The proposed use, new hangars, is compatible with the designation of the site as an airport in both the Comprehensive Plan and the Airport Master Plan. The hangars are supportive of aviation. 3. Staff indicated a shortage of hangar space in the general area and the applicant's proposal will help fill the need for additional space. There apparently is a community need which cannot be served at very many locations. 4.The buildings proposed, prefabricated buildings, are generally in scale with other development at the airport. They will not exceed 20 ft. in height. Like many of the existing hangar buildings, they are metal walled and generally open. 5.There will not be any appreciable increase in noise, light and glare as a result of this development. 6.Adequate public services are available and will not be burdened by the proposal, although the water supply for fire suppression will have to be modified to meet the Fire Department requirements. 7. Parking for the office will have to be at the usual ratio of 1 stall for each 200 feet of office space. DECISION The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The parking for office uses, if any, will have to be 1 stall for each 200 square feet of office space. 2. Fire Department requirements for fire flow and hydrant spacing will have to be accomplished. ORDERED THIS 24th day of February, 1986. 4 (a,-- FRED J. KA MAN HEARING E AMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 24th day of February, 1986 to the parties of record: Bob Mickel 9244 N.E. 13th Bellevue, Wa. 98004 Vince Lee Public Works Coordinator City of Renton TRANSMITTED THIS 24th day of February, 1986 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Fancher Flyways, Inc. CU-103-85 February 24, 1 986 Page 5 Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 10, 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or ',he discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specif!ed requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebL t the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. For purposes of these decisions and recommendations the terms "Should" and "Shall" are to be considered mandatory. The term "May" will be considered discretionary. When the report is a recommendation to the City Council the terms "should" and "shall" are intended to inform the City Council that if they approve the recommendation the items should be mandatory to preserve the intent of the decision. od Typ.ul CousTeuc mo' IJe7.1 earaf.et sad... b... . .., cala.t, A1cW 'ASO All Pave.Kiir S 1HowlneeC„'5 9twy ....1t ae,,. SI.J.. l' r9doeCSYb• Cokletore Cleo, 1,1•6s IIt—_ I.JoTQ: F.sT ilavT.w eC fs'•roe' 1...q•a 1.u.1J...7S.•i. 1"• to' Co aTRucT•en tDALT&Ili i Nasswey •.aq,ueee,..a3 1d ...A ,.,,II be_ .. d acJued . il,c c ,po.. .-. ew 0.'' JcT eE de•w049s Qt. 3.,.Id..1, DcP T. lAPw1, c f-- s!o'— A+1•..T.. ter: -• 4-----d• --.1-.- _-`J•-, T_ ~ - es-A__ Ir I — I5..,.1•1.> 11,1T C/avT'a.. eC 5 I•••.)a& bu.W•.•, rS' • 100' Scala I.• to' I Mt*? Mr.1N NoeTMA w Ft I-wag,. el A.ac••T .. .. sc m i 400 See.fa G Cif..a, •u0 I.T ab*.ees 4 i9 w b...114 yI•.. I.ut V At•et.. Gkv.p... •C es'- .00' I.•.v.& 1,...1J.•3,71%.te'Sn•4 P• to' CO DM. .'vL.i.ew c i I T?t5C.co 5.9n t T"IT.u, Iffy Peucc I.- 1 r1 I I I 1l.&T• clrvT•«• Cog 5 AwM.0 bu,ld.u) I Se ta 1'• Ze' L__ r_ J L- _J L_ 1 i I Ir 1- - - -1-- -- 1---J Pors.blc tuna, hAaarh!t bu.IJ...aJ1 11''a.A'• rrT' uew Me7M. nwM.1..t3u.ltlow.* w.•'A• R.'. +-waacl.eo. Fly...,,.y5 e w..n n.•T•.y ...u.2,8y: 'R.E. 1-I.ek« C.o.+. Ce. Lc.. Re M1 CC 21734 MI<3: F I tw b me •.../aa i// 1 oc.Tebea 1985 New N KwJy Z.vd .,qJ. -c1v. oIey1 D I smite,.smite,. ." t ectrbea r1/S y: If s f 3 z Iit' t z.0' 1 j• ScwM. I"• 20' T'..1 M1Na.T . • c..s Tiu, T...ca` RO Adwo,1 Y new 00 H—I a --I. am Imar Tfja 10 A— AL p IT IL 0 r'- z'7r_,. _fi rlVVI 31 j7 soft on 1.00N,04 16 13-1 41 J_ _4 ft I- Lai4PI. It FIR _w OL It Ab RrC FAN[HER FLYWAYS, INC. CU—l03-85 f APPLICANT FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC,TOTAL AREA — 1,65 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS WEST PERIMETER ROAD VIA AIRPORT WAY EXlSTl '4G ZONING P—1 , PUBLIC USE EXISTING USE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING AND AIRCRAFT TlEDOWN AREA PROPOSED USE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN PUBLIC/QUASI—PUBLIC COMMENTS 220 IL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON FEBRUARY 11, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: FANCI-IER FLYWAYS Application for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of two 2) air„raft hangar buildings having approximately 6,720 square feet and 4,500 square feet respectively to house seven aircraft on property zoned P-1, Public Use, file CU-103-85; property located at 243 Perimeter Road on the Renton Municipal Airport. WOODALL REZONE Application for approval to rezone 0.23 acre of property from H-1, Heavy Industrial, to B-1, Business Use, for future commercial development, file R-081 1-85; property located on the northeast corner of Park Avenue North and North Sixth Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON FEBRUARY 11, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : January 31, 1986 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANETTE SAMEK•-MC KAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in RE Nra J on the 4, j}/ day of:January, 1986. DES. eLe _r100e SIGNED: I frIe J 2202Z CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 11, 1986 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENT ON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Exarl ner. FANC;HER FLYWAYS Application for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of two 2) aircraft hangar buildings having approximately 6,720 square feet and 4,50C square feet respectively to house seven aircraft on property zoned P-1, Public Use, file CU-103-85; property located at 243 Perimeter Road on tte Renton Municipal Airport. WOC,DALL REZONE Application for approval to rezone 0.23 acre of property from H-1, Heavy Industrial, to B-1, Business Use, for future commercial development, file R-038-85; property located on the northeast corner of Park Avenue North and North Sixth Street. 1028N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-121-85 APPLICATION NO(s).: CU-103-85 DESCRIP "ION OF PROPOSAL: Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of two aircraft hangar buildings having approximately 6,720 square feet and 4,500 square feet respectively to house 7 aircraft in a P-1 zoned district. PROPONENT: Fancher Flyways LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 243 West Perimeter Road on the Renton Municipal Airport. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse Impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) Is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2Xc). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than January 27, 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: January 8, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: January 13, 1986 onald G. Nelson a 'y M. pr' • Building and Zoning Director Policy Devel•• -nt Dire, or 74-7 Richard( . Houghton Public Works Director REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : -I-11\.1NJ "J Na.---1 t "J I NI zls: APPROVED E PROVED WITH CONDITIONS SNOT APPROVED ErAit11011`,. DATE : + ) C' \Z IV5 SIGNATUOF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ROVED I ( APPROVED ITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED a DATE ' ( -2s 1 SIGNATUR OF DI •/TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVIr—N : O APPROVED APPROVED WITH ONDITIONS iJ NOT APPROVED S Arip40.410 ir RIrAL SUBJECT TO I LATE COMM ARREEMENT-WATER VO ME CMOS ARREEIENT-SEWER Jp SYSTEM IEMBANT CHARGE-WATER SRnEr EMT CHARGE-SEWER Yr S SPECK NM=AREA CHARGE-WATER Az, SPECK AMEfIMIT AREA CHARGE-SEWER A/n IMMO Malt NM y 1111OMgtNM pot efiak.u- mato . NNIMM 1lt r —i tA1CATM 1ltfEr. _ I yes FIRE FLOW arras YES - DATE ; /— SIGNATURE OF DI ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; 1 !. ,'///' ( / 1, F C' El APPROVED I ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I l NOT APPROVED 4 for 41` DATE : 4 4/f SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1082 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; El APPROVED t, APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS l NOT APPROVED Pt'rev ia e } ,r ir) p/ `Si VC. 73 /Yi5u•r'G /1I J I* // Q Ja..r•- . 2-) P,ro vi d c r a. ?p iL ; S 3) ro ,'arc. o i/l,r , s 053° DATE : REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Dc- APPROVED ROVED WITH CONDITIONS U NOT APPROVED 6%0--t-- t.)G.s I- ot' F w c LS Gv S'7' 1 c ( ` 17 OAJ BLD 6-, /veAde- 1L 4, Oii&tra Q cr 1D 6 I Aelc. C o 1 1-1/ 3i0111 7-17 6 S GPI ) et b-cp ct ÷ oo-z_ L- e-r- hi-p-fr DATE. 3-e7d- SIG NATU)OKIIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Pol/CY DEiTLi0PMERT PROVED Ei APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED pLiptit_TpAqt.07. 440,1-e__ 41 (le 74-4tp,-4-fr"-i#4,:i c 2<- .F)(.2)(3)& di(e. at.e.t 07,1-74-f),-14 -eja0-7 ot10.4,_ (!)1-1-rwILeF2&4-\.- P- 1 4,. q_ 7/066)(3)(L)• A 11 1374_ 1 DATE:I e4 v l t SIGNAT OROFDIRECTOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Fi ze El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED I. AQQesc be Pro to nS Id 12 0 w CUES\_ Per 2. Li2Yrc re, 0 z i n S t(skAA 1/4o5 Wl e_d e‘(iU',P 3 c \1.t,t 1 o C 2 k 2 (o,) H H 2 CCA c 1\ rIcl -., C; vIriteek_I Im {6 r c- ,kow car DATES )2 - ?3 - .16! SIGNATURE OF I T R 0 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Typ.c•1 Cou3raucTieu' 1-lerwl laTce wa sad,.al boye ., celo2 Wcw 'As 6 Al 9.rtnc lvr I s McTAI RoeC,'''5 9e4y ,.. uslen- I,d..n done} Co.ceere Cleoa slabs lerE: E.sT Cie./4v.. .0 45'.me' I,w...q•a 6v.ld...ySeelI'* 10'Cl"TRucT•e.3 DL'/w,ls 4 PM.assSSy •oes,u eeC.10.3dar./,...ys w.Il be- 1.1CJuded IU 41,e eompllre II •''- I ser ep; deww,y95 coL L3u,1c1,0) DepT. APFstevwl, r.i 10' EMT g/INA TOON eiScwl6a 1 1, '•. wato'bu,W.ar.4S • 100' Nee. u..h•aVoaTN Flo. lnau• Zs CO ws 400 f..,.a uif U.i w.10 100' T abTeyS e 19'6' il kb•..Ma yM•,,, hue, a t-r I I%VI' --Kean. Ekv.T,ee •i .S'• ,00' 1+wu wa bv.ld'uyScwla .^•10' 1)..,late vv.,i• rc..ce Spo 6-.4 rrU l uca x l•--32.-.----. 1 l f — I- I I"—~ I L` UeaT. c..vw T.•u o4 5 4wuq+a bo,lel'...) sc•Is i'. 1.' L- T_J L 7_ J 1 I I I__ - - - _ L__—J Poss.bla c.v...c.na v....,,Ac bu,N,•.y tee'• .vT' IJcw P1c7. f{.r91.a 3o,ld,aqa FbMew'Ac b•1+ Aa vw...T c-1.a'IL Flyw.y0 s..,•7•01 1.,.a4,y 134: R. E. 1.- C.I,ckeL. o.+s r. Ce. MCA: Fu1r•b as :,u.4t\ N 1 L.c.y RE MI CC 217J/. L/ I I OaTobea 19d5 New . yAa.W 1Sv,ld,ap-- . 1 lvlsca «tm6n. ',es a-- 34:6 . I I SHEET I .r 1 s 4 3 z 1 1 1sr----- ---- -- L0' 14.QI' i 1 T i/ PUTF Iw E iST...I NydewuT . • C.,s ` 4 Scwla Li zo. T'° e R0.dWM j Y LAND A ELEMENT Single Family Commerciall allLowDensityOffice / Office Park t_ . ` 0.was Multi-Family i`ffillihr / ... .> i N:•• f- l r Medium Densit o000 0 i 1:::A ..1.-RI ..• . yy 000 00o Pubic/Quasi-Public 1 1 I.11••C Multi-Family 1 High Density Light Industrial f Multi-Family 40' Recreation vg,•••4 Heavy Industrial Qaa Greenbelt Manufacturing Park f A E.. Revised March 1983 ak r late' A\Aik v LAKEN , 11.4 ,1 1 J • If 1'`.. WASHINGTON IJ ititi Ih i) #:IIii .i, k•...i N , 1 k L Z 11 oM10,/ a 1. m. 1i.I1.."M0I.....1•.' 1.. P' 6. 1. O*,." WI, 2t,,. A 1,:_ L1•.:i. 0 là 1UII .o lil 0op"° • • • • • • • • • • l I1fWaIWlI17I6I1aIl1 lI 1l. i:.t.:t:.i1L: o o11ro:1N o, 1g. 1F 1. 3:.-" 0i°7„a1m11[11iN1do1111m A•;,- m•.: f::: t—•.: l J00009•o;! • • • • • • • • • ••• • • 0 o O o o°p0 • • • • • • • • • • ••••• p°O°'llil_ -1 0°O°°°O°O p p°o' 00000000°a • • • • • • • • • • tom E ^' o°o •-_ !h•000000000. •••••••• • • • • • • • • 1. • • si j: ; ( yA --_ ,0°00$0a0; • • • • • • •o r t.0000 goof • • • • • • g OQN 1, • • • • go. y 0 1 0 0 0 0 0,?I a . • o°•°•m•°p.p°o k--a oO qqp°°O.1 ` • • • I 1 • • • • 0°0• i o;o,o,o o u;o ,,,,,,00000 0 0 F C:,r.zyctc:>,,o,o•• 1 o.o a ..4 : 000p° ° p°• r1• • • • • • i V u 000„000 lYoo iah o°ogpo °o°o a? 000° /1 Ziii: ti, ", 1 a oo0g0gog000.og• •.. i..:, z•. 1 1, .:f I r i o°o°000 o°o°o°oo• 1.' o°•I p 1 • 0 0 0 p, o 0 0 o i'• i1 02,00 °O° 1 O , O O O °°O°O° 1 °•1 1L"l1I•M • O°O°°°op 4110.n• ••tb I® 1••• It1•N 1 • o 0 0 0 i 0•.. o0. i% 0 i.`.f* 2. c i' p' l,.;"4.:':1.:::::,•::.•„...:e:..••:]•:(•::.::: i*::i.::•*:::i•.:•i:.:.n.:::::.:.::: i:.::n.:::•.::•::•:..:•::• i:..:,;.::'a:...::.• X.: i:.:... s':::.:..-:.:.. 1•:,:..• o,. c r' ri•••1' 'o°o°o°o°o°o , ii:-- z''1 i cN., t,, f, N i-e7. -...'474i1.m1-1i14n1i,. b,..n. 1fr„• iV111, 1h4v 0;::41,# d4isI1I,:,I, 1 i'e'tS•tl.`ioi'. 'S nla • c 1enC .°°00°O°O°O°O .•1•.••11•••..i.• / 'Cr:: E211,,"•' a 0, 114 1••/•••t. 0000,00000 • 1••••11••t•I] \ • ®y., ,_ s c ,•,Ij ems.d!n carmen•-•• d JO[ Tw' 1••11 1 Si_ OW`• I i 5>Si<%'ii i i2>i:C r • v . f 000000000 , ietIS co•, , ` Pi, , . NOVA 0000• ':" 00000000000 Ogg -- I L . . "'!'-" kliiii Lt I; .'.! .,11 ''-' 111 t.' '-.1; -.11 •!• a... .4. .. . •Mll, o H_ t:-,i 1. 7-...• I' n rfl: . ,, .. 1 .-.:,'. '. ri H ..., _1 - .Fc 1]F3./ c\t . V‘ • ( . \1 , '1,1 ;:....-:".7..1. .; . V I: 7_,:, ti... 4 J :.- 1 W. 4L• t. O 1 `\ F nip F rrl,\ J2/;'of-'r' 'j,; 1 14r 11,1111 ii r----1 {.----1 , . o - w tl 4 .Z a t' F II ,: P4,:aNia t7 w Tl t;! 1 1+ ti I` •n+ 1. J ,1 .6,,, i711...),,,,,,,,,, i r. ______ iv 441.-ri.T127:7.,7,,,,,:.,...:,1.,..............,. p.:, 51 ems r r ie 1-,i'.t 13+1 - 1 ' P-11 La .1 4. .. --,- - !.... ' ' 1 ..•47 J p•, ._I i ,µme., I .., 0. _ii•-A 1 1.. i; 1• ti iN:•, I XL---. 1 —3'. Y_ . rq i, 1 _ i ; i.' 'f ii , S, y r1G;.11 1 ^..., 4.. i- _f- mot F I . ,. • LJn :jm. ` • • 4. ..v. 1• I l,,',r ..,,ry' ..:1. R. v( i 1 ;rd.,'l l• r.lj,. —•4ir lir 7 vi.\,,VMS d• ii- T Ilkice" 1' ' !1 y. I._p -1 j-_ i, T L K' t .(7 • s• 0 ''lA.• a o PR Cm :.1 ., n •• ! r, dI 1 Z p\NV ells : P a i; i. i , _ter .„ h . 3' f - T o u v i It+; 4v:: 1 u:frot 1 AL I . . T i t it I• 1 L 1 FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. CU-103-85 APPLICANT FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC.TOTAL AREA — 1.65 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS WEST PERIMETER ROAD VIA AIRPORT WAY EXISTING ZONING P-1 , PUBLIC USE EXISTING USE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING AND AIRCRAFT TIEDOWN AREA PROPCSED USE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN PUBLIC/QUASI-PUBLIC COMMENTS PRELIMINARY REPOF 0 THE HEARING EXAMINER FANCHER FLYWAYS, FILE NO. CU-103-85 FEBRUARY 11, 1986 PAGE 3 Traffic Engineering Division: Approved With Conditions December 18, 1985 No Problems Noted Design Engineering Division: Approved With Conditions 1. Provide grading plan for site to insure new paving will drain. 2. Provide drainage plan if need to drain site. 3. Provide oil/water separators in existing drainage system. Building Division: Approved With Conditions December 23, 1985 1) Protected openings and or fire walls may be required on west building near office. 2) No other buildings allowed within 40 feet of these buildings without exterior walls. Fire Department: Approved With Conditions December 23, 1985 1. Access be provided to inside hangar area from West Perimeter Road. 2. Water main system be installed to provide 3 fire hydrants at locations approved by the Fire Department according to city standards. Hydrants present are private hydrant belonging to Boeing Co. and do not meet city standards and are improperly location for use proposed. 4.The proposal as submitted complies with the 11 conditional use criteria as enumerated in Section 4-748(C). The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as public use supporting the function of the municipal airport. The project is in an area specifically designed for airport support uses, ie. airplane storage. The use is compatable with adjacent uses and the building designs are similar. Traffic to the site will be over private accesses specifically designedforlowvolumeuseage. 5.The Fire Department has noted that the water mains and fire hydrants will have to be upgraded to meet city standards. 6.The applicant has not provided detailed plans showing the existing parkinglot. Since the new building expansion represents more than 1/3 of the existing structure, the entire parking area will have to be brought up to city standards. [Section 4-2203(1)]. These plans can be required and reviewed as part of the building permit. One issue arise as it relates to how much parking must be provided. The present City Code does not address airplane hangars separately. The Public Works Department has suggested that no parking be required for hangars because the users place the car in the hangar or the tie down area when he uses the airplane. The Building and Zoning Department believes parkingshouldberequiredforofficeusesandmechanicalrepairareas. In the past hangars have been consider storage areas (warehousing) and 1 parking space for every 1,500 square feet of building was required. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the conditional use permit request by Fancher Flyways, Inc., file number CU-103-85, be approved subject to upgrading the existing parking area to met the city standards for parking lots,including not only dimensional requirements, but landscaping requirements. Parking should be provided only for the office building at a ratio of 1 parking spaceforevery200squarefeetofbuildingarea. PRELIMII'iARY REPORT T -1E HEARING EXAMINER FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC., FILE NO. CU-103-85 FEBRUAI Y 11, 1986 PAGE 2 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Metro Transit routes #109 and #199 operate along Airport Way near the subject site. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: N/A b. Middle Schools: N/A c. High Schools: N/A 5. Recreation:N/A E. A''PLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-718, Public Use (P-1). 2. Section 4-748, Conditional Use Permit. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Transportation Goal - Air Transportation Objective, Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985, p. 21. 2. Central Renton Area Plan, City of Renton, Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985, p. 61-67. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Fancher Flyways, Inc., is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow the construction of two (2) aircraft hangar buildings having approximately 6,720 square feet and 4,500 square feet respectively to house seven (7) aircraft on a 1.65 acre leased site located at the southwest corner of the Renton Municipal Airport. 2.The ERC issued a Declaration of Non-Significance on the proposed project on January 8, 1986 with the appeal period expiring on Monday, January 27, 1986 at 5 p.m.. 3. Various City departments reviewed the project proposal. The Parks and Recreation Department, Police Department, and Policy Development Department all recommended approval. The other departments recommended approval with conditions or denial. The following are department comments: Parks & Recreation Department: Approval December 18, 1985. Police Department: Approval December 23, 1985. Policy Development Department: Approval January 7, 1986. 1. The proposed hangars are consistent with the Air Transportation objective and policies of the Transportation Goal (Sec. VII(F)(2)(3)(4) p. 21) of the Central Area Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal also meets with policy #1 of the Land Use Objectives of the Central Area Plan, page 61. 3. T his request is permitted by Section 4-710(B)(3)(b) of the Public Zone (P-1) of the Zoning Code. Utility Engineering Division: Not Approved January 8, 1986 Needs Approved Plans. 2213Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 11, 1986 APPLICANT: FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. FILE NUMBER: CU-103-85 A.SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval of a conditional use permit to allow the construction of two (2) aircraft hangar buildings having approximately 6,720 square feet and 4,500 square feet respectively to house seven (7) aircraft on the property zoned P-1, Public Use. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: City of Renton 2.Applicant: Fancher Flyways, Inc. 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached)243 Perimeter Road on the Renton Municipal Airport 4. Existing Zoning: P-1, Public Use 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: P-1, Public Use; B-1, Business Use 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Public/Quasi-Public 7. Size of Property: 1.65 acre 8.Access:West Perimeter Road via Airport Way or Rainier Avenue 9. Land Use: Currently the site consists of an existing office building and an aircraft tiedown area 10.Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Airport Uses East: Airport Uses South: Commercial/Light Industrial Uses West: Commercial/Residential Uses C.HISTORY/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date The subject site is part of the original town site. D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1.Utilities: a. Water: An 8-inch water line is located near the subject site along Airport Way. b. Sewer: There is a forced main sanitary sewer line serving the site. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm drainage currently flows into an existing system. OF R4,4A 6 © ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTORWL 9 amor MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0 Eo SEFSEM P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR February 5, 1986 Gerta Wirz P. O. Box 412 Renton, Washington 98057 RE: APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL_ USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO AIRCRAFT HANGAR BIJII.._DINGS, FILE CU-103-85; LOCATED AT 243 WEST PERIMETER ROAD ON THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Dear Ms. Wi-z: The City o` Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on December 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of RentonLandUseHearingExaminerhasbeenscheduledforFebruary11, 1986. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the publichearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger'J Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:ss 2211Z.2 OF RE, a6 C p 1 NcrTicE94b' 09gTFD SEPS " City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING ' in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON FFRRIIARY 11, 1g86 BEGINNING AT 9:_Go A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: n REZONE From To_ xx SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To Al IOW CONSTRI ICT I ON 11E2AiRCRAELLARGER Runl n INlr,S SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lots I 1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT I VARIANCE FROM GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED AT 243 PERIMETER ROAD ON THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION SIGNIFICANT p NON—SIGNIFICANT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING& ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT " C BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 121 - 35 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-103-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : FAN HER FLYWAYS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : FANCHER FLYWAYS AIRCRAFT HANGERS. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS HAVING APPROXIMATELY 6,720 SQ. FT. AND 4,500 SQ. FT. R:_SPECTIVELY TO HOUSE SEVEN AIRCRAFT IN A P-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION : L )CATED AT 243 WEST PERIMETER ROAD AT THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/2/85 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION l ! FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT I ! POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON DECEMBER 27, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 9WKS 0zISIAPPROVEDI ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE : DJ2 , M85V SIGNATUR OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1382 Form 182 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 121 - 35 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-103-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : FAN:HER FLYWAYS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : FANCHER FLYWAYS AIRCRAFT HANGERS. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS HAVING APPROXIMATELY 6,720 SQ- FT. AND 4,500 SQ. FT. RESPECTIVELY TO HOUSE SEVEN AIRCRAFT IN A P-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 243 WEST PERIMETER ROAD AT THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. TO : 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/2/85 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION I ] FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU l ( PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 ,BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT I ! POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ri OTHERS COMMENTS OR SJGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M , JN DECEMBER 27, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : P.1151-DROVED n APPROVED ITH CONDITIONS l ( NOT APPROVED z DATE : [/c+g 23-$S SIGNATURr OF DI TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT""' BUILDING & ZONING DEP4 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 121 - 85 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-103-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) ' 'E:C 1 '7 19p PROPONENT : FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC.nF,O ecCi- PROJECT TITLE : FANCHER FLYWAYS AIRCRAFT HANGERS. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS HAVING APPROXIMATELY 6,720 SQ- FT. AND 4,500 SQ. F.T. RESPECTIVELY TO HOUSE SEVEN AIRCRAFT IN A P-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION ; LOCATED AT 243 WEST PERIMETER ROAD AT THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. TO : l ] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/2/85 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I ] PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT tR) POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT l OTHER5 COMMENTS OF: SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON DECEMBER 27, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; /0O//C ( 10e1/ 0PMPAI.T. porirPROVED I ] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ] NOT APPROVED GCS (2c- .M (F)6 )(3)64) P) M q- 71o(6)(3)( )46470,A 3vr -C_ -1 Ste zet.„,„,„,1DATE :I /7) 'eK SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT"" BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 121 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-103-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : FANCHER FLYWAYS AIRCRAFT HANGERS. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS HAVING APPROXIMATELY 6,720 SQ• FT. AND 4,500 SQ. FT. RESPECTIVELY TO HOUSE SEVEN AIRCRAFT IN A P-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 243 WEST PERIMETER ROAD AT THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. TO : 11PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/2/85 n ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : IALTILITIES ENG , DIVISION ri PREVENTION BUREAU l IPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT I ( BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON DECEMBER 27, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : A n APPROvED I ( APPROVED WITH ONDITIONS NOT APPROVED WAS 04.44,Ao UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO LATE C$MEIER-WATER - I- AM a;• LATE VMS AGREEMENT-SEWER Ala SYSTEM IIERSAPMENT CHARGE-WATER SYSTEM IEI IIPMENT CHARGE-SEWER Z(eS SPECIAL IISSESS1101T AREA CHARGE-WATER ,Jp SPECIAL UMW AREA CHARGE-SEWER ND AIMS MN PIN yEs AMMO PIM i (pot &4 IAMINtieMOWmussJ eVrwt . . yes FIRE FLOW AIMS YES DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTr`"' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA"VIENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 121 - 85 APPLICATION NOBS) : CU-103-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : FANCHER FLYWAYS AIRCRAFT HANGERS. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS HAVING APPROXIMATELY 6,720 SQ• FT. AND 4,500 SQ. F- RESPECTIVELY TO HOUSE SEVEN AIRCRAFT IN A P-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 243 WEST PERIMETER ROAD AT THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/2/85 n ENGINEERING DIVISION n1RAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n LTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE FREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT l ( BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT l iPOLICE DEPARTMENT l ( POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHER : COMMENTS OF SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M . ON DECEMBER 27, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; r APPROVED III APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOAPPROVED 4K DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHD REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEN 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 121 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-103-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT ; FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. PROJECT TITLE ; FANCHER FLYWAYS AIRCRAFT HANGERS. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS HAVING APPROXIMATELY 6,720 SQ• FT. AND 4,500 SQ. FT. RESPECTIVELY TO HOUSE SEVEN AIRCRAFT IN A P-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION ; LOCATED AT 243 WEST PERIMETER ROAD AT THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/2/85 ENGINEERING DIVISION n 1RAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n LTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE FREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ri BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLIC`r DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1 1 OTHERS : COMMENTS OP SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,t' , ON DECEMBER 27, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; n APPROVED rita APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED I/ env ee 00/4 .. - S,tic- Z) p ro vt.d e a raLclz T'--y 0'C o cil a,_,,. S /-71v fro 1'04 o,//1+ra c,•- ar s e .Q Y` 41(0- DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPi MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 121 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-103-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : FANCHER FLYWAYS AIRCRAFT HANGERS. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS HAVING APPROXIMATELY 6,720 SQ• FT. AND 4,500 SQ. FT RESPECTIVELY TO HOUSE SEVEN AIRCRAFT IN A P-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 243 WEST PERIMETER ROAD AT THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/2/85 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n U -ILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 12‹ BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ri OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P ,M , ON DECEMBER 27, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : l c-T) c n APPROVED Ed APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED JROrt" --( 0 00, 7 dz1 ---c.)6-5 41. -X 4Z W ,4C.C,S 1 0 Gem Q` D oAv Cep 6, ,1) AL 04 #,,.dz 634r(Dc5 oc.uow& GU I "/AJ Y(D / 7--/-/ S Re_-D 6 .3 i 1- 41-c ar-F x-,- _ .2(o&-z- w ,ice- f 17 '_6--,-r- //a-,9,_.. DATE : SIGNATUR IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT—' BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 121 - 85 APPLICATIOV NO(S) : CU-103-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT ; FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. PROJECT TITLE ; FANCHER FLYWAYS AIRCRAFT HANGERS. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS HAVING APPROXIMATELY 6,720 SQ. FT. AND 4,500 SQ. FT. RESPECTIVELY TO HOUSE SEVEN AIRCRAFT IN A P-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION ; LOCATED AT 243 WEST PERIMETER ROAD AT THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/2/85 l IEUGINEERING DIVISION I ( TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : laFIRE UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION PREVENTION BUREAU C PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT I ( POLICE DEPARTMENT l ( POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 ; 0Q P .M. ON DECEMBER 27, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; IZ e n APPROVED Ed APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED I, Recess be. Pcou\ d.e. +o ,nS C- V12n AY t V"S Pe r'parjekr 2. L% 1 IZ S(is lie, \(\S tLd (-a eYav', e, 3 g `/l dl2hl F' 0(2 k ,f\s 2 ibu4 t)Q,,t()A-- . -aet,40,r<1.00--0 'LIs-k2nJt‘rl, c2i-t()".4.2— n' et', a„I YYT(6 etr l k y`" fY D SC DATE ; /2 - ? 3 - Fs-- SIGNATURE OFTI T R 0 ' AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 r A 7 OF R 4614 1-1 c, PUBLIC WORKS DEPART 1Y c.) 0 ® z RICHARD C. HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR z miLL 0O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 9A 206 235-2569 o P 9, 4r60 SEPI , 5 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH November 7 , 1985 MAYOR MEMORANDUM `,,-`': :;r . ,,' sj Li Ii,, I I, I C I I \.'I IL, 1iillNOV71°85 T0:Ron Nelson BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. FROM: Richard Houghton SUBJECT: Airport Perimeter Roadways and Building Set Backs This memo is intended to establish the status of the Perimeter Roadways on the Municipal Airport. Each of these roadways is in essence a private road dedicated to the provision of public access to the Airport and its business operations. As such they are subject to restrictions which are not normally associated with regular dedicated public road rights-of-way, e.g. the Council-imposed ban on jogging activities and the Airport-imposed restriction of access in certain locations. Developments on Airport properties between the Peri- meter roadways and the interior taxiways are already severely constrained by the geographical space limitations and the special clearance needs characteristic of aircraft operations. Since we will soon be dealing with Hangar Construction Proposals , we are requesting that a determination be made concerning the non-applicability of the usual 20 ft. set-back condition from roadway to building insofar as Airport Perimeter Roadways are concerned. Please contact me if you need additional information. VL:pmp cc: Aviation Committee I 1028N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-121-85 APPLICATION NO(s).: CU-103-85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of two aircraft hangar buildings having approximately 6,720 square feet and 4,500 square feet respectively to house 7 aircraft in a P-1 zoned district. PROPONENT: Fancher Flyways LOCATION 0= PROPOSAL: Property located at 243 West Perimeter Road on the Renton Municipal Airport. LEAD AGENC Y: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than January 27, 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: January 8, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: January 13, 1986 t4iti/ Nonald G. Nelson ar y M. prl•-.Building and Zoning Director Policy Devel.. =nt Dire, or Richard( . Hoighton Public Works Director 1003N NU I ICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMIT TEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significanceforthefcllowingproject: FANCHER FLYWAYS (ECF-121-85) Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of twoaircrafthangarbuildingshavingapproximately6,720 square feet and 4,500squarefeetrespectivelytohouse7aircraftinaP-1 zoned district, filenumberCU-103-85; property located at 243 West Perimeter Road on theRentonMunicipalAirport. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significanceforthefollowingprojectswithadditionalconditionsimposedasmitigatingmeasuresundertheirautiorityofSection4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: BRYANT MOTORS, INC. (ECF-104-85) Application to rezone 8,240 square feet of property from R-1, Single FamilyResidential, to B-1, Business Use, file number R-079-85, property located125and125MeadowAvenueNorth; and application for variance from Section4--711(D)(6) to allow a reduction of required landscaping along MeadowAvenueNorthandNorthSecondStreetfrom10feetto3feet, file numberV-102-85. ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (ECF-119-85)Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three,two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site,file number SA-100-85; property located at the northwest corner of LindAvenueS.W. and S.W. 39th Street. CRILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (ECF-124-85)Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two buildingstotaling153,300 square feet of office space on the 10.48 acres of property,f'le number SA-106-85; property located on the north side of S.W. 39thStreetatthe800block. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and ZoningDepartment, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERCactionmustbefiledwiththeRentonHearingExaminerbyJanuary27, 1986. Published: January 13, 1986 1 ' FORM 115 N OT E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. FCF-121-85 R cH-103-25 PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CCNSTRHC:TTON OF TWCI AIRCRAFT HANGAR BUD fLN( S HAVING- APPROXIMATELY 6,720 SDIJARF FFFT AND 4,500 SQUARE FFFT RFSPECTIVELY TO NOUSE 7 AIRCRAFT IN A P-1 ZONE GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS PROPER-Y LOCATED AT 243 WEST PERIMETER ROAD ON THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. ) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL, FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., ,JANUARY 27, 1986 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE V/ITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION IIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: A tLD IIU S ZO IVIr0 6 ' DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBFR 17. 19R5 COMMENTS DUE: DECFMBER 27. 19R5 ECF - 121 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). CU-103-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT: FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. PROJECT TITLE: FANCHER FLYWAYS AIRCRAFT HANGERS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS HAVING APPROXIMATELY 6.720 SQ. FT. AND 4,500 SQ. FT. RESPECTIVELY TO HOUSE SEVEN AIRCRAFT IN A P-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 243 WEST PERIMETER ROAD ON THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. SITE AREA: 1.65 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 11,220 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: jDNS Q MITIGATED DNS ri EIS REVIEWED BY: C 1 TITLE: DATE:v FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:roL. I -f DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 17, 1925 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 27, 19R5 ECF - 121 - 85 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(s). CU-103-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) t,L C 1 ,t 1985 PROPONEPT: FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. POLICY PROJECT TITLE: FANCHER FLYWAYS AIRCRAFT HANGERS nPirl 1PIWRIT ncp-r BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS HAVING APPROXIMATELY 6.720 SQ. FT. AND 4,500 SQ. FT. RESPECTIVELY TO HOUSE SEVEN AIRCRAFT IN A P-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 243 WEST PERIMETER ROAD ON THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. SITE AREA: 1.65 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 11.220 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACCTT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth l/ 2) Air 3) Water 4) P13nts 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) En ironmental Health 8) Laid and Shoreline Use 9) Noising 10) Aesthetics 11) Liqht and Glare 12) Rer:reation 13) Hip;toric and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Ut _lities COMMENTS RECOMMENDATION: DNS MITIGATED DNS 1 EIS REVIEWED BY: 6-4fOe U45o 1 TITLE: /SS1,41-747Wet Ql^ DAl E: _ FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pi RE 0 I DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 17, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: t .EVMBFR 27. 1985i! ECF - 121 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). CU-103-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT: FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. DEC y 8 PROJECT TITLE: FANCHER FLYWAYS AIRCRAFT HANGERS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS HAVING APPROXIMATELY 6.720 SQ. FT. AND 4,500 SQ. FT. RESPECTIVELY TO HOUSE SEVEN AIRCRAFT IN A P-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 243 WEST PERIMETER ROAD ON THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. SITE AREA: 1.65 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 11,220 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: rip) DNS E] MITIGATED DNS l EIS REVIEWED BY. TITLE'J/ ,G a, DATE: 2 FORM ##14 REVISED 9/10/85 lIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI REVIEW NG DEPARTMENT: l.J 1 1L-1-1 (E)- DATE C: RCULATED: DUMBER 17, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: DECFMBFR 27, 1985 ECF — 121 — 85 APPLICATION NO(s). CU-103-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT: FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. PROJECT TITLE: FANCHER FLYWAYS AIRCRAFT HANGERS BRIEF CESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS HAVING APPROXIMATELY 6,720 SQ. FT. AHD 4,500 SQ. FT. RESPECTIVELY TO HOUSE SEVEN AIRCRAFT IN A P-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATIOJ: LOCATED AT 243 WEST PERIMETER ROAD ON THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. SITE ARIA: 1.65 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 11,220 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT FEVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) EErth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) En-ironmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Hot sing 10) Aesthetics 11) Licht and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: eryi DNS f MITIGATED DNS 1 1 EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: P FORM ##14 REVISED 9/10/85 IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PCJLI C.- DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 17, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 27, 1985 ECF - 121 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). CU-103-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT: FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. PROJECT TITLE: FANCHER FLYWAYS AIRCRAFT HANGERS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS HAVING APPROXIMATELY 6,720 SQ. FT. AND 4,500 SQ. FT. RESPECTIVELY TO HOUSE SEVEN AIRCRAFT IN A P-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 243 WEST PERIMETER ROAD ON THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. SITE AREA: 1.65 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 11,220 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT FEVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Lard and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS r MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY:0.- --. TITLE: 1111 DATE: L-23 -8 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 IIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S. : REVIEW:NG DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBFR 17, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: DECFMBFR 27, 1985 ECF - 121 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). CU-103-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT: FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. PROJECT TITLE: FANCHER FLYWAYS AIRCRAFT HANGERS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTLUCTION OF TWO (2) AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS HAVING APPROXIMATELY 6,720 SQ. FT. AND 4,500 SQ. FT. RESPECTIVELY TO HOUSE SEVEN AIRCRAFT IN A P-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 243 WEST PERIMETER ROAD ON THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. SITE AREA: 1.65 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 11,220 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT FEVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Al: 3) Wa :er C 4) Pliints 5) An: mals 6) EnErgy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Rec::eation 13) Hisioric and Cultural Preservation 14) Trarsportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: cv r RECOMMENDATION: BIG DNS Q MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: DA1 E: / FORM #14 S REVISED 9/10/85 VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW Sn«1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ek)(01IJF . -truCO DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 17. 1925 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 27. 1985 ECF - 121 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). CU-103-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT: FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. PROJEC- TITLE: FANCHER FLYWAYS AIRCRAFT HANGERS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO AL] OW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS HAVING APPROXIMATELY 6.720 SQ. FT. AND 4,500 SQ. FT. RESPECTIVELY TO HOUSE SEVEN AIRCRAFT IN A P-1 70NED DISTRICT. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 243 WEST PERIMETER ROAD ON THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. SITE AFEA: 1.65 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 11.220 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air v 3) Inater 4) Plants 5) Animals I/ 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation V 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS n MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DA1 E: _ c'/7;-5- FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 FIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 12ARL V)ck.Y0 RE"cizEAilOL) - DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBFR 17, 19R5 COMMENTS DUE: DEC_EMBFR 27, 1985 ECF - 121 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). CU-103-85 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT: FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. PROJECT TITLE: FANCHER FLYWAYS AIRCRAFT HANGERS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) AIRCRAFT HANGER BUILDINGS HAVING APPROXIMATELY 6,720 SQ. FT. AND 4,500 SQ. FT. RESPECTIVELY TO HOUSE SEVEN AIRCRAFT IN A P-1 ZONED DISTRICT. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 243 WEST PERIMETER ROAD ON THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. SITE AREA: 1.65 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 11.220 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation r 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: 6' DNS Q MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: MK KEC DATE: DS2,C, 8 85 FORM 1114 REVISED 9/10/85 fp t" Tr rnj` 111 . DuuDEC131985 OF RE 11'), BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C. HOUGHTON • DIRECTORZa Qo MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 206 235-25690, 9gT D SEPT` BARBARA Y. S-IINPOCH November 5, 1985 MAYOR Mrs. Gerda Wirz Fancner Flyways, Inc. P. 0. Box 412 Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: West Side Office Property - Hangar Construction (Council Approval - Meeting Date Monday, November 4, 1985) Dear Mrs. Wirz: The Council confirmed the approval of your request for permission to proceed with plans for construction of hangars on a phased-development bases, subject to required administrative procedures. Tho;e procedures are summarized below together with some estimated time frames: 1 . Conditional Use Permit) 21/2 to 3 months 2. Environmental Review ) 3. Building Permit 11/2 to 2 months Combined time = 4 to 5 months) The following forms etc. are attached: 1 . Conditional Use Permit Application (with Fee Schedule) 2. Environmental Checklist 3. Building Permit Application (with Fee Schedule and Requirement List) 4. Master Application Form (for listing of all above items being submitted) Please contact this office if you require any additional information. Very truly yours, 4Gelwa /7. Yig-c-c;.44:,,\_Richard C. Houghton °- Public Works Director VL:pmp cc: L. Wawz.en J. Buiuvs P-Z1.-LAV - 9R 9N0Hd SOLPIT OIHO 'NOINVO • g9E . xoq e MS "3AV - --1ddiFiAA gZgi- 0Ni cElb(4111. sieBueH-I 4.1ei3liv ul Jamsuy uiepowy egi 8 illinava ai Ftic 4_41.:),!0,141'," '"11,*'`., k,,t? ,,,,,14:1"#'-,.' ''-I'',X4t ''1. , i; -• sot 14447.,-,!,.,, '- :,•, '','..., .h...1,-4 Ohl,'• .';•",'•I'I"c..:1'-1:1,;••,40.''''' ' ,''''', ; ' "a '14+-7 rv:.1;,4:.......,;:. . .'.. ,, .,,,40.4.._ , , .04, 4.,,o,„,t,,. ^".‘," '0:-.!' .'''''ff..,-• is,—' 4,.:'. ',,,,,„ ii,„„. „-1.°1,...,, , C4",,0.11•111).;;.**"'". •. 11111. 4ppik, 4.0,1,...ilt vgi, .-• 4,10Aglfitor• -imummiltimmoit iiiiiiiiiii iv, , ,_ I tr0.1.1 II lr'Ir. .....7,..--:".:7-.... . ..,‘ III 1I • 1. v.... 1 • 111 ii 1,: iiii,' s -•-s..,--...: 111111 i it:ILITII!!;1:1 ; 1 ' 444seammi ft••••••.. I 01.4114**4. 1 -." l'"'. 1111111 The Widest Choice Makes 9 HANGARS a 1," , . A' for safe, adaptable,economical storage are a"`' r` a Fulfab specialty. We have expanded our range of sizes to provide shelter for most A I RCRI1FT HANGARS Popular private range and dimensions s elte of Fulfab T-Hangars are easy to compare in the charts on the back page. Our design and fabrication methods have made Fulfab T-Hangars the standard of the industry. Equally important First Choice r dM cw•r;r Ki :::. +ram ,, e.. , i.;r .y raRfa,•.+`. a G °', ., i1 w 'jliiiMkka r. - a"" 4#t 3 4n " ...t' . •. 41.1."'' n•ia w i ar.'aa. rA_ ^y: 0• if ... r, ... - .rr• '- t M "`.++Y.,'„+ a,•. . i r" .rn;d.. nt+M— r.M' ..r c":+ •" k I.i.;.. i 1. - .:, •.;,...,, r:,,,:...u-..«.. I ik I . 1 1 1111 rIltINI rrr 1 1 ills _ 1 Mk., Lim , ' , 1 i 1 1 k ;,. ,1— . - Select the models that meet your need...in size... F .,door style...urnit line-up r 1 to you, probably, is the fact that Fulfab T-Hangars can be ASSEMBLE, panels are lifted into place, attached to the erected by almost any available labor and can be dismantled foundation and bolted to the adjacent connecting members. and moved if necessary. No special tools are needed. Fulfab T-Hangars are pre-engineered and quantity pro- FULL NESTED PLAN USES SHORTER TAXIWAY duced for low cost.All-steel component parts are sure-fitting.Where building length is limited, or where taxiways must be You may add more units to lengthen the hangar at any time kept short, the Fulfab FULL NESTED "T" uses space to best without difficulty. Complete foundation and erection plans advantage. You can "store more planes per lineal foot." are furnished prior to shipment of material. PANELIZED DESIGN greatly simplifies and speeds the enclosing of walls and partitions. Nearly all the sidewall materials may be as- sembled into panels in the flat prior to erection. QUICK TO WINTERIZED for "Snow Country" GALVANIZED for Long-Run Savings FULFAB gives you a very generous overhang of the roof COST OF UPKEEP is a vital consideration. That's why gal- sheets, shedding drippage far out from the doors, minimiz-vanized exterior walls and roof are standard on Fulfab T- ing freezeup problems. Mini-slot bottom guides for doors Hangars. Our buildings are UNIQUE in that most of the reduce friction and contribute to trouble-free operation. structural members such as purlins, girts, door track, door frames, center columns, etc. are also made of galvanized It is important to check up on the way hangars have per-steel. formed in an environment comparable to your locale. We If you have old T-Hangars at your field, you will appreci- can direct you to nearby fields where Fulfab T-Hangars give ate the superior durability and good looks of galvanized the most satisfactory service in difficult freezing weather. Fulfab "structurals." r 5. I i P...—.111 tliha: I a i I. . 1 i' I I 4. _ l9 1 4% lrl f V i IC.. .. 6.4. . 4. r.. . 0 I, ow roof drip SLIDING DOORS cearshaor guides!Electric Power-Lift BI-FOLD DOORS are factory assembled into large panels. Each sliding sec-DELUXE "push button convenience" is offered on four Ful- tion is carried on top roller bearings which ride on non-fab models(two OT's and two LK's)which have doors raised fouling monorail track. The leaves are kept steady and true or lowered by 3/4 H.P. motor and self-braking worm gear. along the bottom by intermittent guides. II COLORS AVAILABLE f. 14.W . FOR WALL & DOOR SHEETING L lam: -r zi a f,3• 1 II 7 it I I _. II"% C1l 0.....= r - ii oir_ 941, is «.. _• :.rr i 1 O IT Sliding door leaves come BEIGE WHITE BLUE to site ready to hang. P' y .A*-,,,„ ..-y ' iF 2P S 4J P s j Y,rt cl X gfft!!`' ty ! 7. CITY Or RfENTON 9LMs . : ,.''P'--!:, :;." le BUILDINGS FOR 1.1DEC 13 1985 11. 1 t K. F 5 _ , , , ... , . a e„ 4,,._ , ,..,•,...,.;:i.-:,'• ..• ---...- 4"tiri-1 1 , Y P:f tF ' 1 Y a s! r n s" :',,,. y# ,.. w: r• P.. ai.r 1° + fra , ''`,+• 17 C3 h 4'!ra f yam' s y - r 4,. r aeE'eY.Y`3 x>'P t i -.; t t+ i• A.,' F if ; rc,-.t`R S 7 s.,'.S.at.,.f..,: .5+..f...o I TA.r: '''-Yin+ r i jim J . r Y #• „ .,•k:.31't I s yit.Y'9fi f;z•iLY!s a y V k , Y• 3 l } r `+ P F fa , d)y,f Jp# f E unlimited for air( Vee Neal Aviation.La Trobe,Pennsylvania thy} , 4. ., Iasj 1• 1Iri;.... a 4'. -':. . JTir Bartow Municipal Airport,Bartow,Florida White County Airport,Sparta,Tennessee t ri i 4,..,'., ef: f,": P p L t Sikorsky Development Flight Test Center, t t. r a y N :PA q / r F k -,t Y' rrt. y 3. ,s y i-: TY ' W{ i ::k - f5 N1 y.f r• . .. s`.r r:i{.ai fl,1' ao w,' ,,+ W'1 s«::, a i , N o .ijn tiR v b t + 4, w'nn: a k k } ,4v 4`H $;' a vM 6 t 4‘, ,r K.zitfy'p1a' y i T,:'ig.ge. There's no better way to be sure top-guided door system that centers, Atlantic can custom your next hangar meets your features specially machined, design your hangar to allow for exact needs than with an Atlantic grooved wheels that glide easily any of the support services you hangar system. From small "T" along solid steel rails. It's a may require; including: office hangar units to large clear-span superior door system design space, parts and equipment service hangars,Atlantic has the that assures dependable,storage, maintenance and experience and capability to trouble-free operation. repair, as well as sales and provide you with an attractive, display areas. economical building that will Custom Design Capability.The possibilities are truly reflect your demand for quality. Atlantic's ability to custom unlimited with a hangar system The Door System Makes The design hangar facilities has from Atlantic. Difference. been proven time and time again. From the smallest single- Atlantic hangars are aircraft hangars to mammoth equipped with a bottom-rolling, flight testing and service artow Municipal Airport,Bartow,Florida Police Helicopter Hangar,Jacksonville,Florida i"`: 4''''''' 7,,<:'sL is t '''x f41' s ., ,+ o..4 y • 1' i AM dd'3atr{ayp fiw<Xs r Y. +? t M[r Jim Bagley Bait Company,Winter Haven, Florida Kit Palm Beach,Florida y tt.4...F.,t';i I 1F' }1a'3r 1 4 i 11.1 izit:.k I a ..glzbttvdA3 A A 11 f,4*:.1‹( ''%. ''' 1 i", 1: / i .P.a g:< t a aX9y `" i* 1: i,-N, OF I A 9i BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z U o O9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 0 1-6D SEP-T'- BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: October 28, 1985 TO: Dick Houghton, Public Works Director FROM: Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator! SUBJECT: FANCHER FLYWAYS PROPOSAL OF NE HANGARS Thank you for giving us the early opportunity to review the proposed construction of new hangars b " Fancher Flyways in the southwest corner of the Renton Municipal Airport. It appears that the proposal as presented would not comply with the P-1, Public Use Zone, which recuires a minimum of a 20 foot setback from a city street. Of course, I am assuming that West Perimeter Road is an established city street and, therefore, the proposed 'hangars #1 through Ir~11 would have to be moved 20 feet to the east. The larger hangar that is 45' x 95' would appear appropriately placed. A conditional use permit will be required. The planwould have to include a detail of the existing parking lot and meet the parking and loading standards for dead storage (1 stall per 1,500 square feet). As a site note we are planning to modify the parking and loading ordinance to specifically address airport needs, bi.t if the applicant was to apply prior to that happening they would have to be considered under the present standards. RJB:ss 2031Z yY ITV OF RENT( FILE NO(S): C1) -/ O3 yS G E; ® 'BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ELF la X T MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES Fancher Flyways Inc. ED REZONE*(FROM TO ADDRESS ED SPECIAL PERMIT* P. C. Box 412 CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* Renton, Wa.98057 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* 31-1*- y TELEPHONE 1 1 SITE PLAN APPROVAL 1 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 206-226-6170 No. of Cubic Yards: ICONTACTPERSON Q VARIANCE* From Section: Justification Required NAME a Mrs. Gerda Wirz ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: P. O. Box 412 0 SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Renton, Wa. 98057 ED PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 206-226-6170 Q WAIVER Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: City of Renton ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 200 Mill Ave. S. Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP a FINAL Renton, Wa. 98055 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 206-235-250'_ El Residential ED Industrial Commercial n Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKSE] ; PROPERTY ADDRESS 243 W. Perimeter Rd.Q TENTATIVE Renton, Wa. 98055 O PRELIMINARY EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING El FINAL Aircraft Tied own P-1 PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Aircraft Hangars NUMBER OF SPACES: El ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 7Q" AREA: SQ. FT. ACRES TCTAL FEES 3S 7° a ' 71,867.03 1 .65. STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING ArAK OF RENad N APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: t C VM` `'''-_ ILi; 1 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE:D AcceptedGa.t DEC 13 1985 tt—11' l_1 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: l1,y t Initials) C,,KVI/ :; . ._:` ill-,J +.A.:.:. ti DA ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 1 2 " ( 7 _5 CD Accepted Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) ROUTED TO: 0 Building 0 Design Eng. MI Fire S Parks UA Police En Policy Dev. El Traffic Eng. X Utilities ter REVISED 1-31-84 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). SEE SEPARATE SHEET ATTACHED. AFFIDAVIT I, Robert E. Mickel being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the propertyi ,=Jowner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSUIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 1 DAY OF 19`;6`_i. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT Ak 11(9-iee/e( Name of Notary Public)Signature of MEW Representative 3 7 - Ou-t_rt 9244 N. E. 13th Address) Address) Bellevue, Wa. 98004 City) State) (Zip) 206-453-8851 Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 New Aircraft Hangars for Fancher Flyways, Inc. Legal Description of site 1 . In consideration of the covenants and agreements of the Lessee herein- after set forth, Lessor does hereby lease and demise unto Lessee the following described parcel of real estate accepted by the Lessee in its "as-is" condition, being located within the confines of the Renton Municipal Airport; Renton, King County, Washington, to-wit: Beginning at a point located on the Renton Airfield runway center- limit referred to as Station 0+00; thence N 4°49'43" W along the runway centerline a distance of 210. 27 feet; thence S 85°10' 17" W a distance of 360 feet to the true point of beginning; thence S 85°18'00" W a distance of 178.47 feet; thence S 5°04'03" E a distance of 224.82 feet; thence S 40°06' 57" E a distance of 47.48 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 118.81 feet; thence ,along said curve through a central angle of 53°50'24" an arc distance of 111 .64 feet to a point of tangency; thence S 89°24'31" E a distance of 214. 37 feet; thence N 28°10'41" W a distance of 179. 38 feet; thence S 85°10' 17" W a distance of 83. 13 feet; thence N 4°49'43" W a distance of 176.29 feet to the true point of beginning. Area: 71 ,867.03 Square Feet CITY OF REPO' OF I? 1'I L5 DEC 13 1985 ECF: I1 City of Renton U 8LILDING/ZONING DEPT. NAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST0, 94Te0 SEP1t. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Construction of two hangar buildings at the Fancher Flyways site located at 243 W. Perimeter Rd. Renton Washington. 2. Name of applicant: Fancher Flyways Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Fancher Flyways, Inc. Contact: Mrs. Gerda Wirz 226-6170 P. 0. Box 412 or Renton, 14a. 98057 Mr. Robert Mickel 453-8851 4. Date checklist prepared: December 9, 1985 5. Agency requesting checklist: Renton Building Dept. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Work is expected to begin as soon as the Building Permit is issued. If work can begin by May 1, 1986 then work is scheduled to be completed by November 1, 1986. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. One additional building of approximately 7056 square feet is planned. The location is identified on the submitted drawings, the building style will match those to be constructed now. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None is known of. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None is known of. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Construct aircraft hangar buildings at the specified Fancher Flyways site. Two buildings will be constructed. One building of approximately 6,720 square feet will be built to house 5 aircraft. One building of approximately 4,500 square feet will be constructed to house 2 larger aircraft. Existing parking and landscaping will remain. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site is an irregularly shaped site located at the South end of' the Renton Municipal airport. The Street address of the site is 243 vi. Perimeter Rd. Renton, Ala. 98055. The legal description of the site is included in a separate section of this application. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat. rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Less than 1% c. What general types of soils are found on the site 'for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classifica of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Most of the site is currently paved. The balance is covered by grass or gravel covered earth of unknown classification. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so. describe. No. 2 - 1L-O) e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No filling or grading is expected which will change the contours of the site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The existing site is 90% covered with impervious surfaces. After work is completed, 95% of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None will be needed. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction activities may cause very small amounts of dust and exhaust fumes. The completed site will not increase, and may decrease, the amount of aircraft exhaust fumes. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 3 - 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. No 5) Does thr proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site clan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Grourk 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No 2) Descrt waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industral, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The existing storm sewer system will be used. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. o 4 - c. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: No new measures are needed 4. F lants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Shrubs ti grass Less than 5% of the site is grass. o crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grass C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The esisting landscaping that is around the building will be kept. 5.A iimals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other None Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other None Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No 5 - d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None will be needed 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be used for heat of the 4,500 square foot building, no heat will be available in the 5 unit building. Electricity will be used for lights in both buildings. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. rYo c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The heated building will be properly insulated to keep heat loss to a minimum, and will not be heated at all times. The 5 unit building will have separate electricical meters to make leesees accountable for their electric usage. No heat is provided in the 5 unit building. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Risk of damages due to spills and fire have been reduced to a. minimum by the use of concrete floor slabs, and steel building construction. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special services will be needed that are not already needed and available. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are needed b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The primary noise source is from taxiing aircraft, aircraft takeoff, and aircraft landings. These noises would not affect the proposed project. Neither would the proposed project add to the existing noise level. 6 - 2) What types and levals of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise would not exceed that currently existing in connection with aircraft activity. Construction activity would be between 8 A M and 4:30 P M Monday through Saturday. Long term noise levels would be the same as they now exist. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None are needed 8. Laid and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site : Aircraft tiedown Adjacent: Aircraft tiedown, repair, taxi, takeoff and landings. Surface vehicle roadway to aircraft areas. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. One single story steel building used to house the offices of Fancher Flyways, Inc. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? P-1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Facilities to sell, service and store airplanes, service airport patrons and those ordinarily incidental and essential to the operation of a municipal g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of airport. the site? Not known h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Zero to three additional people would work in the area due to the new hangar buildings j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None is needed 7 - 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project is consistant with the existing and projected land uses and plans. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None is needed 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Height: Twenty feet Exterior: Painted metal b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None is needed 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Exterior lighting will not exceed 1000 watts total. Lighting will be used during regular airport operating hours. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Building, tower, field, and street lighting is minor and will not affect our aircraft hangar project. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None is needed 8 - 12. Recri ation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None are needed. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. There are none c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are needed 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access to the site will be by Perimeter Road. Access to this or adjacent property will not be impacted by this project. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? No The nearest transit stop is about one half mile away. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The existing parking will be unchanged except that the spaces behind the 4,500 square foot building will be for compact cars. d. Will the prop-isal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing road: streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe indicate whether public or private). No improvements will be required or needed 9 - e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The project is along the West and South sides of the Renton Municipal Airport. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No additional vehicular trips per day will be generated by the completed g. Project.oposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None are needed 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None are needed 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities current! available at the site: electricity natural gas, Fai.;?)@fuse serviE elephon anitary sewet)sep is system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity, and water will be needed for the new hangar buildings. Refuse service, telephone and sanitary facilities are available at the Fancher Flyways building which is adjacent to the new hangar buildings. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: ew Name Printed: Robert E. Mickel 10 - l 7 1 1—R—Pd NOT NEEDED FOR F""'^HER FLYWAYS HANGAR BUILDING PR• T D. SUPPLEMEN1 AL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans andFrograms. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them inconjunctionwiththelistoftheelementsoftheenvironment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the typescfactivitieslikelytoresultfromtheproposal, would affect the item at a greateriltensityoratafasterratethaniftheproposalwerenotimplemented. Respondbrieflyandingeneralterms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production ofnoise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. 1-ow would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? P-oposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. Haw would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areasorareasdesignated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; suchasparks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered specieshabitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 11 - 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, includingwhetheritwouldalloworencouragelandorshorelineusesincompatiblewith existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or publicservicesandutilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirei vents for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: 12 - I CITY OF P.I;N1ON rn'ti P, EicI{. I DEC 1 3 M ICKEL CONSTRUCTION CO. QUALITY REMODELING AND NEW CONSTRUCTION" December 13, 1985 City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, Wa. 98055 RE: Conditional Use Permit Application For: The construction of Aircraft Hangar Buildings by Fancher Flyways, Inc. at 243 W. Perimeter Rd., Renton, Washington of Renton Municipal Airport. Here for your use in the above referenced matter are the following documents. 1 . EigY t copies of the Master Application form and affidavits of ownership. 2. Eigl-t copies of the letter from the Public Works Dept. regarding their approval of the project. 3. Eight copies of the Environmental Checklist form. 4. Eight copies of the specified site plan and building elevations. 5. Eight copies of the factory brochures showing the type of buildings to be constructed. 6. One 2opy of the P. M. T. reduction of the plans. 7. Eight copies of the justification for the subject construction. 8. A check for the fees specified is transmitted herewith. The proposed Aircraft Hangars are needed at the Renton Airport. Their construction is consistant with both the comprehensive plan for the Airport and the ].ease from the City of Renton. Your approval of the proposed Hangar Buildings is respectfully requested. Very truly you , E. "Bob" Mickel P.O. BOX 347 MEDINA, WASHINGTON 98039 206) 453-8851 WASHINGTON STATE GENERAL CONTRACTOR LICENSE #RE-MI-CC-2I7J6 cc: Fancher Flyways, Inc. WY G z:rN,7ON Eq11 [1didflEC131985 Justification For: Conditional Use Permit Applicat?id t lNG/``ON Ih" DEP Date : December 10, 1985 By: Fancher Flyways, Inc. P. 0. Box 412 243 W. Perimeter Rd. Renton Municipal Airport Renton, Wa. 98057 Request: Construct Aircraft Hangar. Buildings at the above listed address for Fancher Flyways, Inc. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed Aircraft Hangars are in conformance with the existing general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan. The project has been reviewed and approved by the Council. Community Need: There is a shortage of hangar space at the Airport. As the general economy continues to improve the need for hangar space will become even greater. Effect on Adjacent Properties: No adverse effects will result from the construction of the hangars. The adjacent property is aircraft related. The new hangars will be an improved use of the area which now is used for aircraft tiedowns. Lot coverage: Existing lot coverage : 3.6% Existing lot area: 71,867. S. F. Additional lot coverage by new hangars 15.6% Total lot coverage after new hangars are complete 19.2% Yards: Yards are in accordance with required setbacks at the Airport. See plan for details. Height: Buildings will not exceet 20 feet in height. Compatibility: The project is compatible with both the existing and future use of the neighborhood. Parking: Parking is already available and suitable for the site. Traffic : Traffic will not be impacted by the construction of the hangars. The number of aircraft that will be using the site will be unchanged, thus the number of people and related traffic will not be increased. Noise, Clare : The amount and frequency of noise from the aircraft will not be different from the existing usage. The amount of glare from the hangar buildings will not be more than the glare from the individual aircraft currently tied at the area. Landscaping: Landscaping is already in place at the subject site. Justification--Continued from page 1 Accessory uses: The only uses to which the proposed project will be put are to sell, service and store aircraft, service airport patrons and those ordinarily incidental and essential to the operation of a municipal airport. Conversion: No existing buildings or structures will be converted. Public Improvements: The construction of the aircraft hangars are in and of themselves public improvements. At the end of the lease period the hangar buildings would revert to the City of Renton. There is a need for more hangar space at the Airport and this project will help fill the need. End of Justification statement CITY OF RENTON s8 of R4, at DEC 1 3 1985 z PUBLIC WORKtnikaiitMENT RICHARD C. HOUGHTON • DIRECTORz 00mow MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o 206 235-2569 4? co SEPZE4O BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH November 5, 1985 MAYOR Mrs. Gerda Wirz Fancher Flyways, Inc. P. 0. 3ox 412 Renton , WA 98055 SUBJECT: West Side Office Property - Hangar Construction (Council Approval - Meeting Date Monday, November 4, 1985) Dear Mrs. Wirz: The Council confirmed the approval of your request for permission to proceed with plans for construction of hangars on a phased-development basis, subject to required administrative procedures. Those procedures are summarized below together with some estimated time frames: 1 . Conditional Use Permit) 2 to 3 months 2. Environmental Review ) 3. Building Permit 112 to 2 months Conbined time = 4 to 5 months) The fol . owing forms etc. are attached: 1 . Conditional Use Permit Application (with Fee Schedule) 2. Environmental Checklist 3. Building Permit Application (with Fee Schedule and Requirement List) 4. Master Application Form (for listing of all above items being submitted) Please contact this office if you require any additional information. Very truly yours, Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director VL:pmp cc: L. Wcumen J. BUhYV4 SENDING OF FILE FILE TITLE a( 147e1°L27'd°6 el1, 1003 ,6