Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA86-0301 f eq)\ i O I)\E.AN Si Suite I No. 1 Existing fence I Brener.41..m NI00/ N tit tY IT.W 400.0NY ll u w-rrr• ea.impUtUar al VehOteila J ,R 1C)0 Its m 2 I NEW t STORY STORAGE 0 k O O ` C. _ 10'Landes..Do.or tv. O . •Otw70 9' 41%., e kiil Bldg Ice.•I. Haut eewta•r•Q '•e•_W p i V V e t ,t 3 O J o s 1 NEW 2 STORY STORAGE q7- t,: n L d IS sue O EXISTING SHED ROOF Q.i a e. 1 Li'o 070 91V . W Q co I- zJ I ra Y a eeemr• t 0 2 J S.Landscape butler i INEalatln9 6'cen. calfdJ NEW 1 STORY.TONA9E ou O 19 c:"' ° k t' 0 MANAGERS QUARTER" 1 U) U 0 .... ,* T., T m. art V'. 7..i Nit tS'n'W 001g.- F.711 43 f 1.1,i t,, - -:. . <`'.1 ,Qd I and OFFICE j 2)9 0 11:.. 0 3'7 \ d O e • ..0.A co 5'Land..cullerj I ' 1 U- OEXISTINGCONCRETEJU Eaiating gate rgr•In•rg•n.T..n..l••.n1T L—Eatetind tire L•It••e•••.ter j BLOCK BUILDING y o Q 0 • LANDSCAPING PLAN t NOTES 0O Scale :zo'-e• 47a......... F V 02t.0 T.. r,. 1L e.- verse"RIii-e..(. d e..N.-foul wNp ethe.f0 0.A t•NicmelPLANTKEY a e. w+oN. Nvwean'T Vir saw. .-e.l.,. maow-.P.CON .+grt.o vu.¢- r,_ rr e. y Y1PL .LLrvecr 41 elfta. s 1.4.........e.ww04eArND SIR....1,H4 Ee.masqeueae,'a e000,SvotecncM NL.1V.•,FUl,.T4?N OR N4itL n1u.4'OC l e ti0 A.l e.eGGPGvppON;CZ.'v r.,r O ryM O.I!N..f OiY,uet STING K;n .... ,,r.'./31184VTTcwu0 a00Wo MI0..IN OIUM c.1UNG.a...07.7101C'M e..G v+LGT,w ACes,CO:2W N.NLL Pmu10.w.u.....e.nx1.1.•( u,-.421Dw.. l a ro...c.. C. a 4.uRenrsr a ww.ta.e..a rr*ee.wl.T'war H 1.14 .tw o+ M I. II"—l ew0 Zw..Y e.r.L.4¢P vy RWi TR SiR.N4 ai J a.iv rJ.,.e.Zwr.r u...G.1Wf Y.IR. I Neer. _ 1-`.oxTVDMcw aurtu n...ARID r•••a• s[.POLLNO c.NK. 9 ON wcoet'f0 1ffOYLllgi( J t,.J.. sZa..Y O sZu agaper o..pvr.. 3..',"r N,, IP1 e T. .'ante..-rVa1•a.o,04...s' ® r, es..r=. s I'a.r.i._ r. ole.w '.=Nu 0 r7Jd 11' r•rr".... rd Rd. vNr.RT 7e raga i 0,............,_ ...,,..,..,.,.. .......,.......,,, .,—,...il a .o.Faa,.. ,......400.Q .•:SS .e i ,. mY r1O..N7 r.wk 4.AnTIN(. 2.15 TWEE.Vwr.+w....r c.q ET!c. er.e goal"n wf 16...er..c..a Delta. sr.r 6 o emu.. ,y A a6-Exi•tlV ire.Taut 1 • 1 qy I T:i i UQR1Z•ning G1Yv, c ^ 10211 Mn Ire aYdr V1 —Ls Existing lease Ex•YtIM 1••••Se••••me••• o Q atllnnle.esen•Im 9ap01 N t(ta'iT^N KOOOW I ur.•.rR.Irro.rNu u• LT SI p NEW t aTON1 lTOt1AeE _ IZ t 1 i Y rl ftAE!t r Figill' 4C 1tY L•deey•t•If•r nowt° 1' r Stolen I1 C,w1 said. U U 51d4 ltaa-eloA lt Asphelf g z+saev 4re.air.e+e s..w.easn.x cmoxn«..fterar.w Li— F- c taig.?'g?•: 6C,'. aSie..'ew.a..r v '. 9WCWF 4••4 a= Ern! uei' °. 1 Min t sTCRT BTNiu4e i.•. YYa^ }~ ' i,. • L'p..' f. L W a-LV°VVe butte. i rt I `r' tit-At. I ,t" a i°' tq Er EXISTING SHED ROOF I ZQ z r j._ n+ f r s'` Pr a'rt, "- .lj a ar..n.oa cnruten d uj 1..4. A z • Y.., i Yi r.„_a a ,; +ACC r( 1V o F1 t.-ceenlara rE .•-°.Art.,. y a,, 4 ' •31.tkz a n 1lp4 A •halt Qi "a. 9Kia :{4,?3, ++ xx ; 14' t "' a a p .. E•InIN I.epee-•elA root..•flea >•i F.' + JMA"a is ~ a"i T 4or'',,`t L n L• for repaid of ntEn•• III I rla fRr.. 4'' 2 + "*r " r F IeW1STIRS?dia#A5E t '1 L 1< r.•L 4 d 1 • r= a r K 8 s3F t1 a4e4 C 3: • 1 i«.T 3!`e.Acc'il sr— i JR' ,A--ham' ' SS tk j r {' ', v..SSWV!i. he Y i t Z E:I•Hng tilted to b•r•me••d—;-+ r cta.$_-: t } 5• e.- ar-.t, e.,£ e',C'r r • yP MANAGERS QUARTER' U Z gr v Y mow,argr?nlri ver^'rsgn_,q "`} - ap ri parr rvi-r-•. - w dIi v_ Vf'-1 and OFFICE i . Y:.-,. 170 Y e_ Ka': eD ice.° 91 f1• \\ N;Ia•r••w eoo.og• wr tieo J I f l I i Existing planter for warn-family units Existing utility pole IXe.1'`.( /Mi,gad•fir•f org`••11 wolf ell°1g e ro E•r•mo.•d. IIIII4 W Z CO Z L: EXISTING CONCRETE I V s ga' 1 • E.l•tl• ere ITgra•t 2 ! BLOCK BLDG.I 1j s° co 0 Utility and•mrgeecY •stool•V•m••t 5'Landscape tiltr Si Zoning a•L..d.e.e.buffer r Z Ili i SITE PLAN cedar Put Apartments 1 CC I dent Y•I a0'-0•• i lI.-'• u 0 1 ICI ,1.* I i I co 5 LOT SIZE. 10032.a n Legal description IL''S tgµj, fc;-./' Fii. WW -- - - LOT COVERAGE steine a 1 wlf Th••Vlh 400 feel sl tn••apt 200 fat et tn• 341 t r y3..10ALLOWED: a5S 12020*QM au J} S r4 4 7 r AS lnOMeoo of th ng d• a•st•ou.foo•is,t tn••outn• I•e R r.FE7.• f AS•.. IIRMACTUAL: SaA 0!1 av nit ! r++ae.11. Ng°srM PifO. peel omn o.n•n • r is,m•boom Vet • L W IA 4.! LY4L •V Big A4•os n g.t rotz3 noun.r.nae a.••L w.M, l E ; —: ^] F-0PARKINGREQUIRED:(1•ace/2000 N fL net) 26 on Ping lCoent Y.W. •acept the•.tit tine.cr•,and Ip se r"'- 1.ACTUAL: 33 ae Vt the•outs 30 IVt ter road BUILDING AREA: aN/Nenlf 1 PHASE I III.I immil milill1111.. Iq 1i. • I'15200•a tL i CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V 1 noun(fully•prinkl•d) tea° t f I' ._„ . PHASE 2 20186.1 ft r OCCUPANCY: 32 WHS-STORAGE 1 t ----' y! f•1^;;_fie.r 1: *,; --- PHASE 3 21600•0.It R3 MANAGER'S RESIDENCE and OFFICE ..;-- ^.L•,i:' r' ~ O t `I I , TOTAL: pages are..e-n. IIFF GAL TYP.LIGHTING STANDARD ZONING: Et VICINITY MAP Ll 4 . ! ..!..--..-4. s -sitiv, f, ; 1,-,& r• :., . , 4-- 4 4' At".. . '• . ..:e.-r..:.'1. . . I 4.'•• , 7 Jalt• -lt,. -4e 4"V.:.!;‘,: 4 e•4- ,„; 4 ,._ I d,..... i . ". 7:... .14.: '' 1 a. I sli 1.• , . :-.. a , is "e, I Scli,. . 4'.• I 4 ..?. 111......•-• t P p 0,... MO _ IONLIMM 1 . e 4... . t Jo•. 111- - , Ari ,,14 I ' A 1... 1 4114045, 110 dirAeASL.. 1. 1,' • in 4• 4". iirmigellir. r ....- ArWY- -- - v 4 L I i 1: T F f I V4 U VI il[ arr. a • ii:4 4.4. I,/ I-4 I , II; 1: 1.. 4 k I 1" : ., . • tt i . i -itt il 1-or 1 „ •• pi, h Ceii 1 It' a a yzyttt i ill1111a: 1 1,1, 41‘ t t • rr, • r1 7.0 tie 1 tir. , i• . 7., 7 s 4 1' 4. a , I ' 4, 11'.': 4, lit.- • ''' v•. ;..&... , t•. . AL c ,..- 4Iii - p A 11111k.. t t4V. • ,. VU.. i --• Orr-- tle441 1 4. 1 11116 0, r 1 4, Nier 7 jajILIMI___i WOK a.,.. C i 4: 44. 11110"..•*. v*---• 1111. 4. lg.. • 7 IIMIL Ahm. ti A R114 tteghial I, r L '., ate,. A y IPy i 1 i 1t F w r t 1 NIL r r % t A . t' S ''NI'IC'I.4. infiliji: fp 4 , i 4' : am• ipt , z ... . . .„ ..„i to.46,... if4., II 4.,-' 11: ilo.,If t 4'• (A i.!+ r--41-, 4t44%.,-4111b., 4 N1 maPi 14., I. ,. e...,41 wile ilihm, / AN,/•• • 11141114 4,,e 4 A ii.IN, i ' ILI ft IR, iiiii, At, 111411141,,,, - 11C\ 4,,..„..„ tit- iik!.i.. Its j 46 N 444ras ____I ,',I l i 4Ir• k t, ii ANSI Ai 1a i%irjl •-A 1 4_. 1. 114, It a-. ....- to• f AIL 4. = 1 4° 151g*.4- AP" S BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE MICROFICHE e?,4Tirtdbrai( 1) 71dde ' k • 0 CITY OF RENTON tl FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Dan Clements, Director MEMORANDUM DATE: December 28, 1988 TO: Ron Nelson, Building Official FROM: Dan Clements, Finance Director RE: Assignment of Funds, Highlands Mini-Storage The attached assignment of funds for the Highlands Mini-Storage looks acceptable to me. It would be helpful if we could secure the name and telephone number of the contact at Seattle Mortgage Company. Please note, the original has forwarded to Maxine for filing. Dan Clements Finance Director DC:pb attachment cc: Maxine Motor, City Clerk/ CITY OF RENTON DEC 2 8 1988 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2558 CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED DEC 15 1988 ASSIGNMENT OF FUNDS BUILDING DIVISIONtotheCityofRenton This assignment is for the purpose of fulfilling the requirement of bonding collateral for the Renton Highlands Mini-Storage . The undersigned does hereby assign, transfer, and set over unto the City of Renton all right, title and interest in and to $7 , 500 from its construction loan with Seattle Mortgage Company in the name of FMP ASSOCIATES , a Washington limited partnership. The funds shall be specified in the following manner : LANDSCAPING: 1 , 500 .00 - Phase I 2, 500 .00 - Phase II 2,000.00 - Phase III STRIPING AND CURBS : 1 ,500.00 It is understood and agreed that Seattle Mortgage Company agrees to hold $7 , 500 . 00 in the undersigned' s non-interest bearing construction loan account until a release of this assignment from the City of Renton is received. FMP ASSOCIATES , a Washington limit , rtner By. = - ev nald D. Fitzge a , general partner ACCEPTANCE The undersigned , on behalf of Seattle Mortgage Company, accepts the foregoing Assignment of Funds in the this 13th day of December 1988 . jj-Ak4L— SEATTLE MORTGAGE COMPANY SMILOM_JWashingtoncorpration Jean Bell , Secretary o r‘pRENTory FMP ASSOCIATES EC 1 1988810709BeardsleeBlvd, Suite 201 1 LU Bothell , Washington 98011 1NG D'VIsiO N LEGAL DESCRIPTION - RENTON HIGHLANDS 3408 N.E. 4th Street, in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, wiich property is legally described as: The South 400 feet of the East 200 feet of the following: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range East , Willamette Meridian , in King County, Washington; except the East one acre; aand except the South 30 feet for road. I i"l,lJ 4% `' CITY OF RENTON LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 16, 1988 Richard Gulstrom, AIA, P.S. GMS Architectural Group 10717 N.E. 4th Street, Suite 1` Bellevue, WA. 98004 Subject: Highland Self Service Storage File # CU-030-86 Dear Mr. Gulstrom: The Planning Division of the Community Development Department is in receipt of your request to change the material on the exterior walls of the above referenced project. The original building as approved by the Conditional Use Permit called for the exterior walls to be constructed with 6 inch tilt up concrete. Your new proposal is to substitute the concrete with a horizontal beveled metal siding with 5 inch exposure. We have reviewed the samples that you provided our office with and without additional information from you regarding how the interior of the structure will be treated, we cannot at this time endorse the substitution. We are concerned that by using this metal siding, it may be prone to damage that the concrete would not be. Without some form of protection from the inside of the building, it is possible that both carts and the actual storage could damage the metal walls. You have suggested to Jerry Lind that perhaps a one inch particle board could be placed inside to alleviate this concern. If this is your intent, please let us know. Additionally, we are concerned about any adverse impacts that noise would create by the lack of the concrete walls. Please let us know also how this item would be solved. Until we are able to receive additional information that proves to us that the metal siding is as satisfactory as the original concrete proposal, we will delay making a decision on this matter. S. rely, ja Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator DKE:JFL 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 iiiiilS'161 co I Go v I.319c18 GiZONI('iu 10717 Northeast 4th St., Suite 1 Bellevue,WA 98004(206)462-1277 June 10, 1988 Mr. Don Erickson City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Highland Self Service Storage - Conditional Use Permit No. 030-86 Dear Don: I am writing you a short letter on Highland Self Service Storage project. The new owners on the project have requested a material change on the exterior of the buildings. Originally the exterior walls were 6" tilt up concrete walls, the non-combustible material was required by the city Fire Department. Last Monday, June 6, 1988, a meeting was held at the Building and Zoning Department. The owners, Ron Olson (Bldg. Dept. ) , Jim Hanson Bldg. Dept. ) , Ron Olsen (Utility Dept. ) , and Jim Grey (Fire Dept. ) and myself attended the meeting. Jim Grey mentioned an alternate non-combustible material could be used on the exterior of the buildings and he and his department would be satisfied with a new non-combustible material. GMS has researched new materials and have decided a metal siding would be compatible with the existing neighborhood. The metal siding would be horizontal beveled with 5" exposure. The color and product would be permanent, durable, and maintenance free. The product also comes with a wood grain, soft texture, and natural looking--like real cedar. The metal siding would be installed over 1/2 gypsum board 7-1/4 lb. building paper and steel studs at 16" o.c. This would meet or exceed the Structural, Fire and Building Departments requirements. GMS is requesting your consideration on this new exterior material change and would welcome any questions or comments on your decision. Hopefully your decis on will be favorable. If you have any questions, please call me at 462-1277. Si e y I R1 hard Gulstrom, AI• P.S. GMS ARCHITECTURAL GRO :, AIA, P.S. RG/psn cc: Ron Fitzgerald Architecture•Design•Planning Member of the American Institute of Architects AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION I' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER Audrey Ue J O l e RENTON, WASHINGTON being first duly sworn on oath states that A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD L he/she is the Chief Clerk of the THE RENTON HEARING THE EXAMINER E INHISREGULARMEETINGIN THE COU CIL- CHAMBERS ON THE SECOt FLOOR OF CITY. HALL,. RENT° VALLEY NEWSPAPERS WASHINGTON ON JUNE 3, 1986. , 9:00 A.M.TO CONSIDER THE FOLI-O' ING PETITIONS: Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News TRAMMELL CROW .' Application for site plan approval to b1 1,Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers two buildings of 58,000 square feet to a• are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six warehouse, e as office, 5A-027-86; smal retail ando ry d file propertymonthspriortothedateofpublicationreferredto,printed and published cated on the southeast corner of L c' in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, Kin Avenue S.W.and S.W. 41st Street. g GM$ARCHITECTURAL GROUPCounty, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal Application for conditional use perm :o newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for •allow construction of mini storage b i= King County. ing complex in a B-1 qistrict, file CU-C J-' property located at 3400 N.E. to Street. Legal tins offiles niThenoticeintheexactformattached, was published in the Daily News above areaonfilescre ntheRenttonhe Bu,dine id Journal , Daily Record Chronicle is , Daily Globe News (and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO ID not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE F E- subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING iN JUNE3,1986,AT9;QQA.M.TOEXPR A, Notice of Public aeari nu was published THEIR OPINIONS. 1,1ay 16, 1966 R1 b0 f.Ronald G. Nt ,4)11 On 5 Building and Zoning Du for F Published in The Daily RBCOtd chic cla" May 16, 1986.,R14s0 a The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$ 5•5 . Subscribed and sworn to before me this 21 s t day of lq G2;7 N ry Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington.VN#87 Revised 10/e4 a' a G l'O U AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING • RENTON HEARING EXAMINEE RENTON. WASHINGTON Audrey DeJoie being first duly sworn on oath states that APUBLICHEARINGWILLBEHEL Y THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINE he/she is the Chief Clerk of the HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE C( J- CIL CHAMBERS ON THE SEC D FLOOR OF CITY HALL, REN N,, VALLEY NEWSPAPERS WASHINGTON ON JUNE 3. 198' >T 9:00 A.M.TO CONSIDER THE FOL N- ING PETITIONS: Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News TRAMMELL CROW Application for site plan approval t -ild Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers two buildings of 58,000 square fee' be! used as office, small retail and ed are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six warehouse, file 5A-027-86; prope ;o months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published cated on the southeast corner c Indj Avenue S.W. and S.W. 41st StreetintheEnglishlanguagecontinuallyasdailynewspapersinKent, King GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal Application for conditional use pc Ito newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for allowcomplexconstr innion -1of mini st CingaB-1 district, file C 30- King County. 86; property located at 3408 N 4th Street. Legal descriptions of the file: ,ted The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Daily News above are on file in the Renton Builc and Zoning Department. Journal , Daily Record Chronicle X , Daily Globe News , (and ALL INTERESTED PERSONS"f AID not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO E RE- subscribers duringthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice a SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEAR! ON subscribers JUNE3,1986,AT9:OOA.M.TOE ' ESS T'v o t i c e o f Public Ie a ri n , was published THEIR OPINIONS. Ronald G !son on Iday 16, 1966 iR158o Building and Zoning 'ctor Published in The Daily Record C• nicle May 16. 1986. R1580 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 25.25 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 21 s t day of .Lay 19 8 6 N ry Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. CITY OF RENTO VN 087 Rev sed 10/84 IUN 17 1986 J BUILDING / ZONING Di I. 0m 7.t m 0N-0 w g'.134 z Osw3 °M% amx, Z3 , AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION a o 0 N m _<° w ^72 v,'a --4 13C odonm- O ' 00Orn m m TO 5 D ,z0K-`i0 h u d re y De i e , being first duly sworn on oath states that a o w a n z o he/she is the Chief Clerk of theCo ° c s-1 D m m 3- w`-zmrm w iiiODF < o` VALLEY NEWSPAPERS Z o< o ,,03Z *D 3 1 Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News a s > > z Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers cn;w N.m cn CO w n-rnna, a)-1a -• 0DLLarelegalnewspapersandarenowandhavebeenformorethansixOd) o *-0 g months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published o CD °= d=m o 3 0 ay n" CD 13- a w DintheEnglishlanguagecontinuallyasdailynewspapersinKent, King 0 m N X o i. -0 o -.- oCounty, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal N N a° w 3 w o.E c) a_. newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for 0 c o(a( w co D , c King County. NNowa o cp f , z s =a aw a0 Z.xlsv * r 0 n' w3ocg-0 O The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News m(0w a .-,_ 6 c n-0 o f -o y n ° Journal , Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News , (and m.= o Z` D „ m not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its a°_3.y 3 m,Q m a, o= oc 3. subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a a 61.77-. o ; A o g•:CT C vnti c.et of T.nv-Ir')nmenta1 ,jeter xPtio_z was published D„ on i.ay 12, 1986 1575 3 "CD wncDnv c The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the 5 N fD°f °°a i sum of $ ?5.2j . m—. 00m D N o 8 7 n 0. ~ SI J AN pwct) wJwaCOT m Ew m < -l° o ao 0) o m _m o r'.. 3.$Q Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 7tti day of i.a y 19 c,o a CD a to o 33 co m per Nc co3pwc 60nw> >,'.m 5...., 0 c)333' CN'S> > ; Not y Public for the State of Washington, 33?5 u) c - _ Vi Q N N() m p 0residingatFederalWay,N 0 c n =,u)wcri King County, Washington. __, _ , w a o coat 0VN#87 Revised 10/84 Ci T Y OF n IV C.•1 Il'< c a.. O r 111) o Nsb*7 nf0 Qiiiivei It1 D ow a iJUL819R6m6o BUILDTNG/ZONING DEPT. pF RAC 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U ` Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o mil o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 9,0 o- CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2501 0 P 91TF E ODSEP August 1, 1986 Mr. John Hendrickson Shidler, McBroom, Gates & Lucas Attorneys at Law 505 Honeywell Center 600 - 108th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Hilltop Associates Appeal (GMS Architectural Group); File No. CU-030-86. Dear Mr. Hendrickson: At its regular meeting of July 28, 1986, the Renton City Council adopted the recommendation presented by the Planning and Development Committee regarding the referenced appeal. A copy of the Committee recommendation is attached for your information. If you require further assistance regarding this matter, please feel free to call. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON 2.- • ' 1./af,S14-4-1 M ' n J. Petersen Deputy City Clerk cc: Mayor Council President Enclosure July 28. 198E Renton City Council Minutes Page 2 Continued De-En Lang, Subdivision Management, 16031 - 119th Place NE, Bothe representing Henderson Homes, indicated Henderson Homes had purchased approximately 25 acres of the proposed 45-acre annexation f r development, noting their pleasure with success of other Henderson developments in Renton. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ACCEP- THE 10% ANNEXATION PETITION, IMPOSE BONDED INDEBTEDNESS AND R-1 ZONING, AND AUTHORIZE IRCULATION OF 75% PETITION. CARRIED. AUDIENCE John Hendrickson, Suite 505, Honeywell Center, Bellevue, representing COMMENT GMS Architectural Group, requested Council advance to the Planning ;d Advancement to Development Committee report. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDS Old Business BY CLYMER, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Keolker presented a Development report addressing five areas of appeal by GMS Architectural Group of Committee Hearing Examiner's decision granting a conditional use permit and den it GMS of Phase III of conditional use permit to allow mini-storage complex a Architectural 3408 NE Fourth Street. The committee report included: Group Conditional Use Permit 1. Caretaker's premises - To be considered both office and residential Appeal an accessory use to the conditional use permit, permitted in an L-1 zo1 CU-030-86 2. Landscaping: West side - Reduction to 8-foot landscaping requirement; additional screening landscaping requirement along the existing building. North side - Hearing Examiner's requirement for a ten-foot setback to remain; applicant to install dense landscaping barn including substantially sized trees, to provide immediate buffers. All landscaping to be installed as part of Phase I development. 3. Outside vehicle storage: Hearing Examiner's decision be affirmed at no outside storage is allowed. Without prejudging issue, the applicant' right is acknowledged to seek limited two-year temporary use permit f r outside storage, but only if all required landscaping is installed. 4. Breezeway connection: Approval with modification to a facade tha can be swung away on hinges or some similar fashion. 5. phase III denial: Applicant has agreed to move the second story of he northerly wall to the southwest building of Phase III, connected to the northerly portion of the project by the breezeway. Committee indicat( I this is not a material change to the project and recommended this char e be handled by staff as an administrative determination and that Phase I be approved. The Committee report also recommended construction be completed within five years from the date of Council's approval of this permit. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCI IN THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT CARRIED. Mandatory James Graves, 1006 NE Fourth, Renton, questioned the use of one wa r Garbage Pickup meter for two residences (one of which he rents) and City policy regarding mandatory garbage pickup within city limits. Mandatory pickup due to contractural agreement with the City's refuse carrier wa explained. It was recommended the matter of water bill payment be negotiated with his landlord. CONSENT Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follow AGENDA the listing: Claim:Claim for damages in the amount of $1,000 filed by Don A. Herman, Herman 1717 Sheridan Road, #310, Bremerton, alleging interference with pare Lal CL-039-86 rights and denial of his right of free association by Renton Police Department (7/02/86). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT July 23, 1986 TO: Renton City Council FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: GMS Architectual Group Appeal The applicant appeals from the conditions included in a Hearing Examiner' s report granting a conditional use permit and from the denial of Phase III of the same project. The site is presently occupied by a building that was used by PNB for vehicle storage . The rest of the lot was also used for vehicle and equipment storage. It appears likely that the applicant now enjoys a legal non-conforming use for storage on the site. The proposed use will continue that storage use but will enclose it within buildings which are visually more appealing than the present building and associated open storage. The topics considered by this appeal are listed below and discussed individually. 1 . Caretaker ' s Premises: The Examiner denied the request to approve the caretaker ' s premises for twenty-four hour live-in manager as being an inappropriate use of the B-1 Zone . However, the B-1 Zone does permit a residence unit on the second floor. Rather than have the applicant artificially install the living quarters on the second floor and the caretaker ' s and office premises on the first floor, it appeared more appropriate to consider the caretaker ' s premises both office and residential, to be an accessory use to the conditional us(_ permit. This conditional use is a permitted use in an L-1 zone and the caretaker ' s premises would be permitted in an L-1 zone . 2 . Landscaping: West Side: The Examiner required 10 feet of landscaping on the west side. The existing building is 8 feet from the property line although it does have a portion of the building only 2 feet from the property line . Although the Examiner ' s decision does not mention tearing down the building or a portion of it, to install the required ten feet of landscaping, that result could be implied. How ver, that is a harsh result and one the Committee does not feel the Exami er intended. Therefore, additional screening landscaping will be requi ed along the existing building at its present location and with its present contours. For the new building to be installed along the west property line, it is felt that 8 feet of landscaping will be acceptable to maintain an even building setback. The loss of the two feet of landscaping from that recommended by the Hearing Examinc will not prove a burden as there is a parking lot adjoining the west boundary of this property and a reasonably substantial distance before dwelling units are encountered. Even then the dwelling units focus to the north and south and not toward this property. North Side: The Examiner required ten feet of landscaping on, . the north side. The applicant wishes to install only five feet of landscaping adjacent to a two story blank wall. Immediately north of this project is a three story apartment complex with the boundary and rear yard of the apartments facing this project at a distance of only twenty to twenty-five feet. Although the apartments are approx ' - mately four and one-half feet higher in elevation than the base elevation of this project, the effect will still be looming. City Code would require a fifteen foot setback if the adjacent residential property was both zoned and on the comprehensive Plan as residential However, the zoning on the apartment complex is B-1 so this Code section does not strictly apply. However, even though the Code sect Jn does not apply, it provides guidance as to the intent when B-1 and residential adjoin one another. The Committee recommends that the Examiner ' s ten foot setback remain as the minimum necessary to buffe this use and that the applicant be required to install a dense land- scaping barrier including a number of substantially sized trees ten to twelve feet in heighth to provide immediate buffers. Such landsc ping must be installed before occupancy of Phase I of this development. Timing: All landscaping will be required to be installed as part of Phase I development. 3 . Outside Vehicle Storage: The Examiner recommended no outsic storage be permitted. City Code permits only self service storage facilities contained entirely within one building. The applicant claims. a legal non-conforming use and therefore the right to store \ lhicles outside . The Committee finds that a conditional use permit abandon: the legal non-conforming use. The Committee recommends that the Hearing Examiner ' s decision be affirmed. However, the Committee is mindful that the applicant could continue the legal non-conforming lie and provide outside storage but rather is seeking to develop a more sightly alternative. Without prejudging the issue, the Committee dc2s acknowledge that the applicant has the right to seek a temporary u: permit for outside storage on the property but the Committee does require that all landscaping be installed before any temporary use permit will be granted. The Committee is also aware of the fact th t any temporary use permit has a life of only two years . 4 . Breezeway Connection: The Examiner 's decision approved a breezeway connection between Phase I and Phase III of this projec . His decision was based upon the statements of the Utility Engineers_ g Department that it strictly opposed any structures over a waterline A looped waterline was to be constructed through this property pass ng under this breezeway. The breezeway was also necessary to provide emergency fire access and yet provide a connection between Phase I and Phase III in order to meet the Code requirement that this self- service storage service be contained entirely within one building. The applicant has agreed to reduce the breezeway to a facade that can be swung away on hinges or some similar fashion. With this modification the Utility Engineering Department ' s concerns are satisfied although the Department does not heartily endorse this proposal. Therefore, the Committee recommends that the breezeway, as modified, be approved. PHASE III: The Examiner disapproved Phase III largely because of the breezeway issue discussed above . Although Phase III presents a blank wall to the apartments to the north, it also provides blockage from noise an light associated with this use . The added elevation of the apartmen s and the extra landscaping required are felt to provide additional mitigation for Phase III impact. The Committee still feels that the two story blank wall is too large and too intrusive for the multi- family use to the north. The applicant has agreed to remove the sec nd story of this wall and to move it to the southwest building of Phase III, that is the building connected to the northerly portion of the project by the breezeway. The Committee recommends that this change be handled by staff as an administrative determination and the Committee feels that this is not a material change to the projec and recommends approval of this concept. Because the breezeway has been approved and because the applicant has agreed to reduce the size of the blank wall facing north, it is recommended that Phase I= [ be approved. Timing: The Committee recommends that the Council establish time limits on this project. The applicant indicates that market force will determine how rapidly construction is completed. The Committee notes that unlimited time following issuance of a discretionary permit created substantial problems in the past, part cularl as other construction occurs, creating unanticipated conflicts. Th re- fore, the Committee recommends that this conditional use permit be approved but construction must be completed within five years from the date of the Council ' s approval of this permit. 1Gzz- e 4PEC R EAs 0 xa_i,Nlly.- e i- f•Aa •tk. sns R I I prirl siIIIZoning 10111.L tlt 1.11 1e21•rNI•ar1Es.L7 MN.-. Ea1...Immo t.Oe r ixal.cam\ d 'aum aoo s' I I—_ t r I I r' i igli T siIIIII n1srZr!e7 a 1-tit a '... e y- a ''ws , "} r. . X ;te- X r S to Loadoe*.WI. p - Ca • 1 ll. C r• = ,= . L._ A e e1aF I••.M. s _1 tt r 1 I w'- L t+v ss ilRZ llA/E! anawaw s+n.x e__. el Wt a# sr, r t.'.4' i 11t 2,.4 ' sr.' :F....f.MlF = asai tu f} Kt.:....s:4.." ..... aIriq E• ..., Y, 1.- I EXISTING SHED RCCF Z co r•ar y x .•. S- .gyp J' 7yK' / r' t '• t i ' t 'i L Ell.y. 3rr£i .1'' 'F'f-^qy .•- 1 tl;`fi; 'Z,* f ,. - <' :„'# :I Ore...c..w.n g roolgo. ler t r: La rowere l see.*I Z 4, fly' II1:SOUT.r'tf• sue T e,I•Rn.1.0 h•.rem.. Y_, 1 IS •-eP3A"•.'x. "' tit!^. X .s c,4-A"` r ;5, Y 7 i MANAGERS QUARTERpcit r Wit. ....._""ter' - ti'- r..e.•. y. ' c fir..?. - -• and OFFICE III l••Wa00.01' Ezl•t!M N••t•r•>wttl-faR1lY..R• EaMabq py! t• !fir•.•. •. . I i to I v I s : 1 i 1 41 \ I I I EXISTING CONCRETE`' l 1 a.wN.•an AO.. i . ; BLOCK BLDG.^ i5u1NNrw.R•.flru..•wI••u•Ny1 Ls'1..a•.w s.Nw 1• fnSITE PLANG A.VNe• L.I LOT SIZE: 50032 y C•. e- i• - LOT COVERAGI 7 .. 1 y Tn.••.tp a00 1•.t.1 the.•.t 200 1•.t•1.M 5, /'_ \ Y:fi ALLOWED: WM S2020 my, l olban.OH . rt. tb•o•tn.ra r. A' - I { H A9 a•o..a ACTUAL: e•1 2041•a.It.c t 1 ns..iiY PAaaaa REOUtRFD:(!apace/3002 w ft.mU ;. 1. _ 1 1 north,ten••0 eget.W.N., r '{ 1 a= 6..•Os aCTOAL 0 4 t. `AN m Y " t.. ot the o. e• .an0 I+ `: Pt: r..:;1' a•r _/. Si e f I•'. Pm*.! sxco,a.tt N7TRUCTI0N T 1 pow O N.APNANI•al 6 {N• L . • \ a , P.lalE 2 24160 N-rt. OCCUPANCY: LE WN7:eTORAaL 1T --_A T t -r-t i :.. t-'r I , '.PnAaE a 21000•0.ft. Ri 'II R[710FNCL sad OFFICE i" i'-- t.` f• roTAL eu7•os• .o-rt..Y• TYP.L1GHT;Na STANDARD ZONINO: N VICINITY MAP pil,„Si ZOO 1E1 4, I 6 Ms i - I -- .11r...... amulg-"Ilsillbr, . I soommar all I I e,i0 01p ta.-rro*---.r-. 1.‘ 1. 6iicsitIS i salmi 4;,. ‘6.1,'tr...4...4.-•-•• 4..." ....-, :_- NV TO 1 1 t" . I:)E-iti C ej i St a Slii 0 RI E S 1DA4p,Senlme 1•111•••••••11.01•00*-- 7---- 1) 4,f.- _-_7_-_-=-----'-7--•_ ____=._1 , - ariamir. I I 1 1 I--. 7 I-44*-------- ----.V i-- ------ t' ---11-1 I: IV v:4 , • 1 I 1_ , it i 41 1--••-•F==4,{1,;, 1;;l - I• ' I- =7- -re 1."..a------r 1•41 r•-..-- 1 -*- --- - _ Emearg-ezms.211. ETA.*CI.tlea.1......ohs moo WM We*a.wles•WO. WEST ELEVATION 111•1•0...... 7 aus••••••• Ap.2 sza,--eaft•c.c... 4iim____ 00111141 7---I, 1r-1.-2--- - --..,f-'..:\..... . el—--i---_;.—--_--L-_____ _____••••,,, r r--- -'',..-''''-'.-:---'""-... .-,•<-•,•1'.' 4-0 4' f'"•e -="=" R. ":, 1----, ------•- --- -- - tts, . 14: *-# t hi."'14S; ------ -=-..-----.,===f; ---- w,mi•all A 41- 1 i 1 4A,-,.., A ' -, : r,1 ft ' • ) 40,, -• 1 .'- 1• . 4-•-'-'--- =•-`.'"' - _.=,.„.. 4„,. il 1lvz 41 I. 511•.,W-11 n, ,,z....- il-,._ t fii:t.k---_-:_-11 . 4', i t;---A - ---mg __ _. . --, ,-:-:.,1-5,!v -—t _,....,- . _„:-- — -,-,..‘,. c t*, 3 f 1 z=4, 1 1 A 16"Lid -7-- H; c---\ i......._ Ift•••••••*Moo me*Ay....v faire•••faft W..*is,. or NW——1 Yana.W.A. .. SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION IFILE ID OChe 0 7 0 1 VD*. 011•010-- rl t4, ei, ----------;• .--..;;tii_....._ 1 i 777- --- -- ,..---- - -- e-. _ V 1.----11, -,IL i --- St flA f 041 2Ikt - • 1• .• - F.7 i 1 Ilii g_4,.....5:.,..v.r.........= 4teitalikIt,i-4- n •if-÷--=. H___ --R__;, R-_,-_ r r:_- R--- R.,_ ,___ M._ Tr__ 1F--_-- F, i 0- R--- 1 :.-77--7-_-_.-: R __,-R--- .."7---7 ------•_----- ' - -:=7_,---77 FP ________, ., 1_:- .,...._ima kL Cowl. EAST ELEVATION S ski.oaf 2....86 Ms OF R THE CITY OF RENTONOo Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, oq co CITY CLERK (206) 235-25010, 94TD SEP-CwO P June 27, 1986 APPEAL FILED BY JOHN L. HENDRICKSON Re: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision, dated June 13, 1986, filed by John L. Hendrickson, representing GMS Architectural Group; Conditional Use Permit File No. CU-030-86. To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with the City Clerk, along with the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. The Council Secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the PlanningandDevelopmentCommitteemeeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories, please call the Secretary at 235-2586 for meeting information. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk S111 Mci3ROOM GA l LS& Ll \S ATTORNEYS AT LAW•A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION Bellevue ueiMM.Ate(cuter 505 Honeywell Center Iungton 98104 64)0108th Ave.N.E. th, '061223-4600 Bellevue,Washington 98004 p.. 'On)622-5110 Telephone(206)453-0300 K Telecopier(206)455-9166 June 24, 1986 L NDRICKSON ue lice City Council CIIIY OF RENTON City of Renton fiUN 2 6200MillAvenueSouth 1986 Renton, WA 98055 1 t J CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ) Re: Hilltop Associates (GMS Architectural Group) L_ .uv[ ; File No. CU-030-86 Dear Council Members: n behalf of the applicant with regard to the above referenced Conditional Use 1pplication, we hereby appeal the June 13, 1986, Report and Decision of the Hearing Examiner with regard to the subject application. The appeal fee of $75.00 is enclosed ierewith. t was the determination of the Hearing Examiner to conditionally approve Phases 1 tnd 2 of the proposed mini-storage building and use located at 3408 N. E. 4th Street n a B-1 zone. The Examiner's actual decision makes no mention of Phase 3, but it is . . mplicit from the findings and conclusions that it is the Examiner's intent that Phase be denied. he applicant specifically requests that the Council overturn several conditions attached y the Examiner to the approval of Phases 1 and 2 and reverse the implied denial of base 3 and approve it as originally submitted. The conditions of approval regarding hases 1 and 2 which the applicant takes issue with are as follows: The prohibition against outside, uncovered storage. The prohibition against a residential unit on the subject property. The requirement for ten feet of landscaping along the west and north property lines. he Examiner is in error in denying the applicant the opportunity to park certain vehicles II the property in an uncovered manner. The subject property has been used for many ears by Pacific Northwest Bell (PNB) as a vehicular storage and repair lot. This site as regularly been covered with a variety of mechanical devices and vehicles used by NB. The vehicles were parked outdoors in an uncovered manner. The applicant in quiring the site has intended to continue that use, although in a considerably more esthetic and organized manner. The applicant simply wishes to park recreational Aides and boats, on an interim basis only, in the Phase 2 and Phase 3 area prior to ity Council ine 24, 1986 lge Two mpletion of the structures for those phases. The parking of these vehicles will be iminated sequentially as Phases 2 and 3 are completed. The vehicles would be parked an orderly fashion and restricted to the areas of the site plan where Phases 2 and are indicated. No other vehicles or mechanical devices will be permitted in outdoor orage. The applicant has a right to continue this use and fully intended to in acquiring le property. lie Examiner erroneously concludes that the provision of an on-site manager, 24 hours day and seven days a week, amounts to a residential use which is contrary to zoning de requirements. The inclusion of such a use is not prohibited by the code and it , clear that the use is primarily that of an office which will be used as the manager's icility. Accessory to that use will be several features which are characteristic of dwelling but are included in the manager's office simply in order to provide the on-site anager with all of the necessary comforts for such a full time position. Clearly the sidential aspects of the manager's use are secondary to its primary function. he requirement for additional landscaping along the west and northern boundaries not required by code provisions, is not reasonably feasible and will not provide any lditional meaningful benefit for surrounding residents. It should be particuarly noted tat along the west property line the existing structure for the most part is set back distance of only 8 feet from the west property line and one portion of the structure t:tends for a distance of 42 feet to within approximately one to two feet of the west coperty line. Therefore the requirement for a ten foot landscape area along the west i.operty line would require either demolition of a portion of the existing structure or roving the entire structure a considerable distance to the east. Neither of these lternatives is either reasonable nor practicable. lie inclusion of additional landscaping along the north property line would also have severe impact. At their present size it would necessarily require the removal of all forage units along the north property line. Alternatively, they would have to be reduced gnificantly in size thereby potentially endangering their usefulness. It is doubtful tat an additional five feet of landscaping will be of any real benefit. Moreover, it Mould be noted that the apartments have existed for some time without any apparent roblem while this property was used as a mechanical storage yard without any signficant indscaping. The applicant's design and proposal will be a substantial improvement it the neighborhood. he Examiner also erroneously concludes that the roof connection between Phases 1 nd 3, in the northwest corner of the site, would preclude emergency access to the nderground water main which is beneath the roof section. In fact, there will be more Ilan adequate space beneath the roof in order to accommodate persons and equipment hat might need to access the water main in this area. Furthermore, there is no realistic kelihood of a break in the water main at this point since problems in this regard enerally occur at a connection or joint, neither of which is situated in the relatively mall area which is beneath the roof area. he Examiner further errs in denying Phase 3 as a result of his denial of the forementioned roof section. Phase 3 is the northern wing of the building and is fully iitended to be connected to the remainder of the building. The roof connection is strongly upported by the Building and Zoning Department. Thus the Examiner is inaccurate n referencing the "staff" as being opposed to this connection. ity Council i Line 24, 1986 age Three he architectural design that is proposed for this use is an expensive one and is unusally nsitive to the residential development in the area. The expense of the design has en accepted by the applicant with the understanding that the proposal includes all I the features of the original application. The Examiner's decision, however, deletes le interim parking of recreational vehicles and boats, all of the Phase 3 units, precludes 24 hour on-site manager and would result in a partial demolition or moving of the xisting structure. If the Examiner's decision is upheld, it may be necessary for the pplicant to reapply altogether using a substantially different design that is not nearly costly as the one proposed. The restrictions suggested by the Examiner undermine to attempt of the applicant to provide a well-designed structure and use of the property hich will be compatible with its surroundings. The result of the Examiner's decision, not overturned, will be to reduce rather than enhance the desirability and compatibility f the proposed development and use. is respectfully requested that a date be established for an appeal hearing before the ouncil in order that the foregoing issues, and others, may be more fully addressed. Very tr y rs, .... sc.ac,\N....) 1 1111, n L. Hendrickson LH:cgm nclosure 43 c: Connwill, Inc. GMS Architectural Group OF i O THE CITY OF RENTON U / 0 'z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, Q` CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2501 9 TF0 SEPI - s- July 16, 1986 Mr. John Hendrickson, Attorney 505 Honeywell Center 600 108th Ave. NE Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: GMS Architectural Group Conditional Use Permit Appeal, CU 030-86 Dear Mr. Hendrickson: The Renton City Council has referred the subject appeal to the Planning and Development Committee for recommendation. The committee is chaired by Councilwoman Kathy Keolker and a meeting has been scheduled on this subject for Wednesday, July 23, 1986, 3rd Floor Conference Room, Renton Municipal Building at 4:30 p.m. You are invited to be present if you so desire. If we can be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact this office. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Council President OF R4, 00 c i z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 Nal rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, O- CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2501 09,11, SEP-CE O P July 16, 1986 Mr. Larry Brown 13975 Interurban Ave. South Seattle, WA 98168 Re: GMS Architectural Group Conditional Use Permit Appeal, CU 030-86 Dear Mr. Brown: The Renton City Council has referred the subject appeal to the Planning and Development Committee for recommendation. The Committee is chaired by Councilwoman Kathy Keolker and a meeting has been scheduled on this subject for Wednesday, July 23, 1986, 3rd Floor Conference Room, Renton Municipal Building at 4:30 p.m. You are invited to be present if you so desire. Feel free to contact this office if you have further questions. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Council President i July 7. 1986 Renton City Council Minutes Page 4 R-3, multifamily residential, to B-1, business, for 1.44 acres located at the northeast corner of NE Sunset Boulevard and Anacortes Avenue NE, for future professional office use. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. GMS ArcAitectural Group Conditional ljse Permit Anneal. CU-030-86 Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision filed by John L. Hendrickson, attorney, representing GMS Architectural Group, for denial of Phase III of conditional use permit to allow mini-storage complex t 3408 NE 4th Street. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Schneider Variance Appeal. (Hilltop Apartments) V-033-86 Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision filed by Gerald & Gail Schneider for denial of variance for fence height at Hilltop Apartments, 500 Monroe Avenue NE. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. King County Interlocal Agreement Draft Concepts Policy Development Department requested review of draft concepts for interlocal agreement with Kin County concerning potential annexations to address issues of mutual concern, minimize conflicts, and avoid duplication by adjacent jurisdictions when planning developments and annexations. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. South Grady Way/Rainier Avenue South Widening Proiect Public Works/Traffic Engineering Department requested legislation to obtain 83.34% Federal fundingforSouthGradyWay/Rainier Avenue South to Lind Avenue roadway widening project. Refer to Wa,and Means Committee. (See later action.) King County Interlocal Funding Agreement for Cedar River Dredging and Bank Repair Proiect Public Works Department requested approval of interlocal agreement with King County to obtain StateEcologyGrantFundsintheamountof $50,000 to proceed with Cedar River dredging and bank repairRefertoUtilitiesCommittee. Lease Rate Adiustments for Fancher Flyways. Inc.. LAG 07-79. and Cedar River Hangar Partnership,LAG 08-81 Public Works (Airport) Department requested review of rate adjustments for Fancher Flyways, Inc. lease and Cedar River Hangar Partnership lease to comply with current standard ground lease rates.Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. Baker Claim for Damages. CL-31-86 Claim for damages in the amount of $25,000 filed for Katie B. Baker, a minor, by parents Karen and Richard Baker, 3015-243rd Avenue SE, Issaquah, for injuries sustained in a fall from a slide at GeneCoulonBeachPark, alleging inadequate maintenance and warning by the City (5/5/86). Refer to CityAttorneyandinsuranceservice. Larson Claim for Damages. CL-32-86 Claim for damages in the amount of $228.09 filed by Patricia A. Larson, 18601 SE 164th, for windshield allegedly damaged by golf ball hit from Maplewood Golf Course (6/19/86). Refer to CityAttorneyandinsuranceservice. Corsilles Claim for Damages. CL-33-86 Claim for damages in an undetermined amount filed by Dionisio V. Corsilles, 1802 Lincoln Circle SE, for injuries sustained in an auto accident at Grady Way South and Talbot Road South, alleginginadequatetrafficcontrolbytheCity (6/27/86). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Pearce Claim for Damages. CL-34-86 Claim for damages in the approximate amount of $6,354.18 filed by Rae Ella and James Pearce, 2528 Burnett Court South, for injuries sustained in a fall at Talbot Road and 26th Street, alleging negligencebytheCityindesignand/or installation and/or maintenance of sewer/manhole cover (6/14/86). RefertoCityAttorneyandinsuranceservice. Ford Court Case Court case filed by Timothy K. Ford, 600 Pioneer Building, Seattle, attorney for Irene Adwell, allegingillegalseizureandretentionofhervehiclebyCityofRentonPoliceDepartment (6/16/86). (No claim for damages filed.) Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Renton Area Multi-Service Center Site Acauisition Letter from Jim Bauman, President, Board of Directors, Renton Area Multi-Service Center, requested joint endorsement by the City of Renton and King County for purchase by Renton Area Multi-Service Center of a 1,700 square foot office building attached to the RAMSC building at 1025 South 3rd Street, Renton. Joint endorsement is required to enable application for 1987 King County Community For . Use By City Clerk's Office Or A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING MITTING t./Div./Bd./Comm.City Clerk For Agenda Of 7/7/86 Meeting Date) aff Contact Maxine E. Motor Name) Agenda Status: SUB, ECT: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Consent XX Decision; GMS Architectural Group; Public Hearing Correspondence File No. CU-030-86 Ordinance/Resolution Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. City Clerk's letter Other B. Letter of Appeal C. Hearing Examiner's Report, 6/13/86 Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Refer to Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A Planning and Development Committee Other Clearance F' SCAL IMPACT: E<penditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) Appeal filed by John L. Hendrickson, law firm of Shidler, McBroom, Gates and Lucas, representing GMS Architectural Group, accompanied by required fee received on 6/26/86. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. I OF R I; o THE CITY OF RENTON U ® Z' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 09,0 co' CITY CLERK • (206) 235-250 P0, 9grF0 SEPSE‘ O June 27, 1986 APPEAL FILED BY JOHN L. HENDRICKSON Re: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision, dated June 13, 1986, filed by John L. Hendrickson, representing GMS Architectural Group; Conditional Use Permit File No. CU-030-86. To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with the City Clerk, along with the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. The Council Secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories, please call the Secretary at 235-2586 for meeting information. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON 2,ce__,..,,_,,,e. e M.9- Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk SHI ER McBROOM GATES& Seattle ATTORNEYS AT LAW•A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION Bellevue 3500 First Interstate Center 505 Honeywell Cei Seattle,Washington 98104 600 108th Ave.N.F Telephone(206)223-4600 Bellevue,Washing 004 Telecopier(206)622-5110 Telephone(206)4. 00 Telex:29-2988 Telecopier(206)4° 6 June 24, 1986 JOHN L.HENDRICKSON Bellevue Office City Council CITY OF RENTON City of Renton JUN 2 6 19111200MillAvenueSouth Renton, WA 98055 nuRy CLERK'S OFFICE ) Re: Hilltop Associates (GMS Architectural Group) File No. CU-030-86 Dear Council Members: In behalf of the applicant with regard to the above referenced Conditional Use Application, we hereby appeal the June 13, 1986, Report and Decision of the Hearing Examiner with regard to the subject application. The appeal fee of $75.00 is enclosed herewith. It was the determination of the Hearing Examiner to conditionally approve Phases 1 and 2 of the proposed mini-storage building and use located at 3408 N. E. 4th Street in a B-1 zone. The Examiner's actual decision makes no mention of Phase 3, but it is implicit from the findings and conclusions that it is the Examiner's intent that Phase 3 be denied. The applicant specifically requests that the Council overturn several conditions attached by the Examiner to the approval of Phases 1 and 2 and reverse the implied denial of Phase 3 and approve it as originally submitted. The conditions of approval regarding Phases 1 and 2 which the applicant takes issue with are as follows: 1. The prohibition against outside, uncovered storage. 2. The prohibition against a residential unit on the subject property. 3. The requirement for ten feet of landscaping along the west and north property lines. The Examiner is in error in denying the applicant the opportunity to park certain vehicles on the property in an uncovered manner. The subject property has been used for many years by Pacific Northwest Bell (PNB) as a vehicular storage and repair lot. This site has regularly been covered with a variety of mechanical devices and vehicles used by PNB. The vehicles were parked outdoors in an uncovered manner. The applicant in acquiring the site has intended to continue that use, although in a considerably more aesthetic and organized manner. The applicant simply wishes to park recreational vehicles and boats, on an interim basis only, in the Phase 2 and Phase 3 area prior to I City Council June 24, 1986 Page Two completion of the structures for those phases. The parking of these vehicles will be eliminated sequentially as Phases 2 and 3 are completed. The vehicles would be parked in an orderly fashion and restricted to the areas of the site plan where Phases 2 and 3 are indicated. No other vehicles or mechanical devices will be permitted in outdoor storage. The applicant has a right to continue this use and fully intended to in acquiring the property. The Examiner erroneously concludes that the provision of an on-site manager, 24 hours a day and seven days a week, amounts to a residential use which is contrary to zoning code requirements. The inclusion of such a use is not prohibited by the code and it is clear that the use is primarily that of an office which will be used as the manager's facility. Accessory to that use will be several features which are characteristic of a dwelling but are included in the manager's office simply in order to provide the on-site manager with all of the necessary comforts for such a full time position. Clearly the residential aspects of the manager's use are secondary to its primary function. The requirement for additional landscaping along the west and northern boundaries is not required by code provisions, is not reasonably feasible and will not provide any additional meaningful benefit for surrounding residents. It should be particuarly noted that along the west property line the existing structure for the most part is set back a distance of only 8 feet from the west property line and one portion of the structure extends for a distance of 42 feet to within approximately one to two feet of the west property line. Therefore the requirement for a ten foot landscape area along the west property line would require either demolition of a portion of the existing structure or moving the entire structure a considerable distance to the east. Neither of these alternatives is either reasonable nor practicable. The inclusion of additional landscaping along the north property line would also have a severe impact. At their present size it would necessarily require the removal of all storage units along the north property line. Alternatively, they would have to be reduced significantly in size thereby potentially endangering their usefulness. It is doubtful that an additional five feet of landscaping will be of any real benefit. Moreover, it should be noted that the apartments have existed for some time without any apparent problem while this property was used as a mechanical storage yard without any signficant landscaping. The applicant's design and proposal will be a substantial improvement for the neighborhood. The Examiner also erroneously concludes that the roof connection between Phases 1 and 3, in the northwest corner of the site, would preclude emergency access to the underground water main which is beneath the roof section. In fact, there will be more than adequate space beneath the roof in order to accommodate persons and equipment that might need to access the water main in this area. Furthermore, there is no realistic likelihood of a break in the water main at this point since problems in this regard generally occur at a connection or joint, neither of which is situated in the relatively small area which is beneath the roof area. The Examiner further errs in denying Phase 3 as a result of his denial of the aforementioned roof section. Phase 3 is the northern wing of the building and is fully intended to be connected to the remainder of the building. The roof connection is strongly supported by the Building and Zoning Department. Thus the Examiner is inaccurate in referencing the "staff" as being opposed to this connection. r City Council June 24, 1986 Page Three The architectural design that is proposed for this use is an expensive one and is unusally sensitive to the residential development in the area. The expense of the design has been accepted by the applicant with the understanding that the proposal includes all of the features of the original application. The Examiner's decision, however, deletes the interim parking of recreational vehicles and boats, all of the Phase 3 units, precludes a 24 hour on-site manager and would result in a partial demolition or moving of the existing structure. If the Examiner's decision is upheld, it may be necessary for the applicant to reapply altogether using a substantially different design that is not nearly as costly as the one proposed. The restrictions suggested by the Examiner undermine the attempt of the applicant to provide a well-designed structure and use of the property which will be compatible with its surroundings. The result of the Examiner's decision, if not overturned, will be to reduce rather than enhance the desirability and compatibility of the proposed development and use. It is respectfully requested that a date be established for an appeal hearing before the Council in order that the foregoing issues, and others, may be more fully addressed. Very tr y rs, 1 4 n L. Hendrickson JLH:cgm Enclosure 3/43 cc: Connwill, Inc. GMS Architectural Group OF R o THE CITY OF RENTON t/Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 90 P` o' CITY CLERK • (206) 235-25C e9 TFD SEP E O June 27, 1986 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. COUNTY OF KING MARILYN J. PETERSEN, Deputy City Clerk for the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 27th day of June, 1986, at the hour of 5:00 p.m., your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail, to all parties of record, a true and correct NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THE HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION FILED BY JOHN L. HENDRICKSON, REPRESENTING GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP; FILE NO. CU-030-86. Marilyn J. te,iseh, Deputy City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 27th day of June, 1986. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in Renton CITY OF RENTOI- N? 16822 FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 19 _ RECEIVED OF -gelar 4w:d lyL karly . fin/, e - ?! TOTAL Received b Y G' , 4•. 1" :F , a " ir} y tx , te. r a t e ` e 4 ? s. c 11' ti` . _ A rrd s ; r 4 a, hC11 Yam' i..,. .5 k It r:• t i. r•3 t i 1,401 ; .. Srtir y 7'tt ro"T"' i- alr .- :. • ZfL. ..,!...7ir 7"" v . Ff Y" 04 . ,0 rt.T lr. — .a T. r. r .,;.•4 a w. a....-r ! y* 4•. T. tt tf T i . t•.• V r s .1+i 1: ^• -• A f Ge 7r t• ` 1. l i tf''`. P.: f t a c F .4% r'1 Y +fir 7' r S '-?, _s a ) ! _'?'Y y, s'i1"w• f, 4 1 1 1. "r`}s .•r 1.. ''V.,> i .,'1 t rig 1C t % t i I AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of King DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 13th day of June 1986 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. 61:1" SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /3_ day of 1986 NotaryPubli 1,,z5 the State of Washin ton, , residing at therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: CU-030-86 - GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) 1242E June 13, 1986 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP FILE NO. CU-030-86 LOCATION: 3408 N. E. 4th Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a mini-storage building complex in a B-1, Business District. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval Hearing Examiner Decision: Phase I and II approved with conditions. Phase III denied. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on May 28, 1986. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on June 3, 1986, at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication, and other documents pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan. Exhibit #3 - Elevation Map showing all three phases. Exhibit #4 - Eleven (11) photographs showing scattered parking in the vicinity of subject site. The above exhibits were entered into the record after which the staff report was reviewed by Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator. Mr. Blaylock covered such information as the request for mini-storage to locate in a B-1 zone;will be housed on property 1.8 acres in size; the project will be built in three phases with phase one utilizing an existing building for storage which was formerly a PNB service area; the B-1 zone permits self-storage warehouses to appear as one building to give the appearance of a commercial building, as opposed to a storage building with large doors fronting on to public right-of-way and other public use areas. He described the surrounding area as consisting of mostly single and multiple-family residential with RVTI and Greenwood Cemetery located nearby. The first phase will be the remodeling of the existing building on the site with the addition of caretaker/live-in manager quarters on the first floor; the second phase would be the two-story building to the north and east of the existing building. Mr. Blaylock stated the applicant felt with all of the residential development taking place in the area there would be a need for their services, with emergency access through an opening on the northwest corner of the site. Concern was expressed by the Public Works Department over the applicant locating a building over a water line thereby preventing them access for repairs should they be needed. To try to alleviate this concern, the applicant designed a removeable roof, but Public Works still does not feel there should be a roof structure located over a water line, even if only temporary. GMS Architectural Group • CU-030-86 June 13, 1986 Page 2 Continuing, Mr. Blaylock stated staff feels the project meets the specifics of the code; the features of the buildings will blend with the surrounding properties; and questioned what may happen to the rest of the site during the phasing process - possible storage of vehicles had been mentioned, which would be an intrusion into the residential area. He believes there is a demand for this proposal due to the residential and multi-family units in the area, and other complexes slated to be completed over the next few years. Concluding, Mr. Blaylock advised staff would recommend approval with five conditions set out in the staff report to the Examiner. The Examiner called for testimony from the applicant or their representative in support of this proposal. Responding for the applicant was: Rick Gulstrom GMS Architectural Group 10717 N.E. 4th, Suite #1 Bellevue, Washington, 98004 Mr. Gulstrom clarified that the owner of the property is Hilltop Associates, with Connwill, Inc. as the developer. He reviewed the project and the applicant's feelings as to the need in the area. He reiterated the need for a live-in manager on the site who will also add to the security of the self-storage project. Mr. Gulstrom reviewed the three phases and their proposed progression; reviewed the site's existing fencing to be used in the proposal; placement of landscaping; and stated they believe if they bring in the storage vehicles and place them in the phase II building area only, during phase I, the impact will be minimized. The area where phase II will be built is away from the residential area and will be approximately 28,000 sq. ft. He stated the applicant feels the completion of all three phases will be accomplished within a short period of time due to the high demand for their services in the area. Mr. Gulstrom continued stating storage will be an interim use; there will be a 20 ft.wide section of roof in phase III that will be removable, sprinklered, and will connect phase III with the balance of the property. He feels there should be no problem repairing the water line should this be necessary and feels there is sufficient clearance for the Fire Department to accomplish said repairs. Reviewing the vehicle trips per day, Mr. Gulstrom stated phase I will have 2 - 5, phase II will bring 10 - 12, and phase III will contribute 18 - 20 trips per day. In closing he stated the applicant feels this proposal is compatible with surrounding structures; height will be below that permitted at 38 ft.; meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan; will not be a 24-hour a day operation; and requested approval by the Examiner. Calling for further testimony in support of the application, responding was Don Miller, 19502 - 56th Avenue W., Lynwood, Wa. 98036. Mr. Miller referred to the Engineering Department comments regarding a drainage plan and storm water retention. He stated he spoke with Don Monaghan from Engineering clarifying the limits of the property, thereby prompting Mr. Monaghan to modify the condition of storm water retention and a detailed drainage plan in lieu of the applicant supplying a schematic of the existing system that is in place and functioning. He had no further comments. Also wishing to speak in favor of this proposal was Loren Anderson, 3500 N.E. 4th Street, Renton, Wa. 98056. Mr. Anderson testified in favor of the development stating his property is a single family dwelling directly adjacent to this property on the northeast corner. He has lived there approximately 5 years and has seen the increase in the multi-family units, and expressed his contentment with this proposal referring to it as a "quiet neighbor". He feels this business will be more favorable than additional housing in the neighborhood which would create more population. He also supported the live-in manager concept for the site which he feels would surpress vandalism on the property. Mr. Anderson did speak in opposition to the proposed storage of R-V's on the site as there is no time frame for the development which would also mean the storage could remain on the property indefinitely. Due to the location and height of his home, his family would be looking directly down into the storage area. He concluded requesting clarification as to the moving of the existing fence. Responding to Mr. Anderson's query on moving the existing fence was Mr. Gulstrom. He advised the fence is there for the security of the first phase of the site, but after the 3rd phase the fence on the eastern property line will remain, but on the north end the fence will come down as it will not be required and the building itself will act as a barrier. Addressing Mr. Anderson's concerns on the storage of vehicles, Mr. Gulstrom presented Exhibit #4 showing scattered parking in the area and stating he feels this is proof of the need for the storage they will provide by removing vehicles from the neighborhood streets and yards, thereby creating better aesthetics and safety on the public streets. GMS Architectural Group • CU-030-86 June 13, 1986 Page 3 The Hearing Examiner called for further testimony in support of this proposal. There was no one else wishing to speak. Wishing to testify in opposition to this proposal was: Ron Olsen Utility Engineering Department City of Renton Mr. Olsen advised the Examiner that staff wishes to request relief from the requirement of a removable roof section from the building stating there is a problem maintaining a water line when a structure is placed over the line. He said it would be extremely difficult to repair this line should it become necessary to repair without the possibility of obtaining specialized equipment to remove the roof section; and, if there is a sprinkler system in the roof section, to close down the water system during repairs could prove to be a fire hazard with no water available to the area for fire protection. Mr. Olsen referred to another project within the City that has requested removable roofs and stated staff feels this would not be a desirable precedent for the City to permit structures over water lines. He had no further comments at this time. There was no one else wishing to testify, and no further comments from staff. The hearing was closed at 9:50 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1.The applicant, GMS Architectural Group, has requested approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a mini-storage complex in a B-1 district. 2.The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered in the record as Exhibit 4#1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.2IC, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5.The subject site is located at 3408 N.E. 4th Street just east of Monroe Avenue N.E., and directly north of Greenwood Cemetery. 6.The relatively level parcel is the former site of the Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company maintenance and storage shed. 7.The site was annexed into the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1480 enacted in April, 1954. The site was automatically zoned G-1 (General) at the time of annexation. The site was reclassified to B-1 (Business/Commercial), it's current classification, with the adoption of Ordinance 1510 adopted in March, 1955. 8.The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of medium density multi-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 9.The applicant proposes establishing a self-service storage facility on the subject site by modifying the existing shed-like structure left by Pacific Northwest Bell and adding new construction around it. In addition, the applicant proposes adding a manager's office which will also be used as residential quarters. GMS Architectural Group • CU-030-86 June 13, 1986 Page 4 10. The applicant proposes construction in three (3) phases, although they have no specific time frame in mind. Market conditions would motivate construction of additional phases. Phase I would modify the existing shed and add the manager's quarters. It would also include a new addition to the rear of the existing structural components. Phase I would be a large one-story roofed over structure containing drive through lanes for access to the individual storage areas. It would be along the westernmost portion of the site along N.E. 4th Street. 11. Phase II would be constructed east and north of Phase I. This phase would be somewhat 'L-shaped.' It would be two-stories high. The smaller leg of the 'L', actually a separate building, will be connected to the rear east segment of Phase I, at the first floor level. A sky bridge at the second level will connect the two segments of Phase II to each other. A common facade along the southern edge of the complex would join Phases I and II providing a unified appearance. The appearance will be of connected peaked roofed buildings. An interior drive-thru courtyard would be located between the first two phases. 12. Phase III construction would be at the northern or rear extreme of the site. It is proposed to be two stories in height, and except for a proposed approximately 24 foot wide roof segment, would be a separate building. The roof segment connecting Phase III with the rear-end of Phase I is proposed to be removable by either a sliding mechanism or a hinged draw bridge type of affair. An easement for a required looped water main would pass across the site at this location. The removable section of roof is proposed to allow access to that line. This roof segment also spans a gated driveway which would permit emergency secondary access to the site from the west. 13. The Utilities Water Division objected to the roofed connection between Phase III and Phase I. The City does not generally permit any kind of structure over water main easements since access must be assured. Staff objected to the removable roof, whether hinged or sliding, since in an emergency immediate access could be slowed by having to operate some kind of automatic or manual mechanism to remove the roof segment. 14. The applicant requested a Conditional Use Permit since ordinarily self service storage facilities cannot be established in a B-1 zone. A Conditional Use Permit allows such a facility but only if contained entirely within one building. 15. Staff recommended that the entire front facade be constructed with the construction of Phase I. The applicant proposes phased construction across the entire site. 16. Landscaping is proposed along the frontage on N.E. 4th and along the western boundary of the site. The applicant proposes 5 to 8 feet of landscaping along the western property line. Landscaping will also be provided along a five foot wide strip along the north property line. An existing slatted fence will be maintained or modified to coincide with the project boundaries. The site is bounded on the west and north by apartment units. Single family uses also lie north and northeast of the site. 17. Staff has recommended that no interim exterior storage of RVs or other similar large vehicles or boat trailers be permitted on the unused portions of the site. Unlike the proposed use, such outside storage provides a potpourri (motley, disorganized group) of sizes, shapes and colors, rather than a unified appearance. CONCLUSIONS 1.The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, will not impair the public health, safety and welfare, and in addition is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-748(C) which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location: c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any: CMS Architectural Group CU-030-86 June 13, 1986 Page 5 e. Parking will not occur in required side yards, and that traffic movement and circulation will be safe: f. Noise, light and glare will not be adverse: g. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use: h. Adequate public services are available and will not be burdened by the proposal. The requested conditional use appears justified, although as currently proposed, Phase III cannot be permitted. 2. While the Comprehensive Plan suggests medium density multi-family housing for the area surrounding the subject site, multi-family housing is already located on the adjoining westerly lot, the arterial nature of the street distracts from residential enjoyment and the design features will blend the use with the adjoining uses. In addition, multi-family housing is no longer permitted in a B-1 zone, the zoning on the subject site. 3.The area in which the subject site is located has a large number of apartment units. Generally apartment residents who have limited on-site storage potential provide a strong market for self service storage units. The proposal will meet the growing community need for this type of service. 4.The scale and generally unified design will prove compatible with the surrounding buildings. The two story peaked roof complex will blend in with surrounding development. A reasonable increase in landscaping (see below) will assure that the use is and remains compatible with its residential neighbors. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property. 5. Access to and from the arterial and circulation around and through the site and building shells appears adequate. The emergency access provided from the west, through the apartment complex, is also sufficient. The traffic movement and circulation will be safe. 7.The proposed project is not unlike other uses along N.E. 4th and should not generate adverse noise, light or glare. The use will be closed during evening hours and therefore should not adversely affect the surrounding properties. 8. Since the site is surrounded by residential uses on two sides, and the site itself is designated on the Comprehensive Plan for residential uses, it appears appropriate to provide additional landscaping along the west and north property lines. While the design appears quite reasonable, there will be large expanses of blank wall which would be more effectively softened by deeper strips of landscaping than the 5 feet proposed along the north property line and the 5 to 8 feet proposed along the west line. These limited strips will not provide much in the way of space for reasonable screening trees. The applicant proposes more landscaping along the south property line which will of course present a favorable public image, but 4th needs less landscaping from an aesthetic point of view than do the residential neighbors surrounding the site. More is also needed to reduce the apparent, if not the actual scale of the structure when viewed from the adjacent residential areas. These narrow bands must be widened to a minimum of 10 feet, and the landscaping subject to review by the City's landscape architect. 9.The use does not appear to be the type of use which will tax the utility infrastructure and adequate public services serve the use. 10. As presently configured, Section 4-711(B)(3)(n) will not permit the construction of Phase III of the project if the loop water main remains part of the proposal. The proposed connection of Phase III to Phase I making one building of the entire complex was tenous at best, even with the removal/sliding roof section. The proposed roof, whether sliding, hinged or completely removable, will not permit quick emergency response if any problems occur in the water main located under this feature. The roof segment cannot be approved over the water main easement. The conditional use criteria requires the entire complex to be one building, and this cannot be accomplished as proposed. Phase III is therefore, not approved. f GMS Architectural Group CU-030-86 June 13, 1986 Page 6 11. The applicant's proposal for interim use of the site for recreational vehicles and other similar storage cannot be permitted in the B-1 zone under the current request. It is not enclosed under one roof. As indicated in the findings and graphically demonstrated in photos, such outside storage provides a motley, disorganized group of sizes, shapes and colors, rather than a unified appearance. It is unaesthetic and unsuited for property designated for residential purposes in the Comprehensive Plan. 12. The construction of the entire facade at this time does not seem feasible nor particularly necessary. All landscaping should be provided at this time to screen the site. Future construction can work around the landscaping as necessary. 13. Therefore, in conclusion, Phases I and II are approved. Phase III cannot be approved nor can the interim usage of the site for RV or other similar vehicles unless entirely enclosed. 14. This Office remains unconvinced that living quarters, although a practical idea, are permitted as proposed. While security staff may be a reasonable on-site amenity, security can be provided without residential quarters. Approval could and probably would created a precedent which could lead to the proliferation of residential units in commercial complexes. That is not something this Office will sanction without direct authority from the City Council. The consequences of such an action must be reviewed by the City Council. DECISION The Conditional Use Permit for only Phases I and II is approved, subject to providing 10 feet of landscaping along the west and north property lines. All landscaping is to be installed prior to occupancy and is subject to review and approval by the City's Landscape Architect. The approval is further subject to no outside, uncovered storage of any kind. No residential units may be provided on the subject site. ORDERED THIS 13th day of June, 1986. FRED J. K MAN / 1"4— HEARING AMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of June, 1986 to the parties of record: Rick Gulstrom GMS Architectural Group 10717 N.E. 4th, Suite #1 Bellevue, Washington, 98004 Don Miller 19502 - 56th Ave. W. Lynwood, Washington, 98036 Loren Anderson 3500 N.E. 4th Street Renton, Washington, 98056 Ron Olsen Utility Engineering Department City of Renton GMS Architectural Group CU-030-86 June 13, 1986 Page 7 TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of June, 1986 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before June 27, 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. For purposes of these decisions and recommendations the terms "Should" and "Shall" are to be considered mandatory. The term "May" will be considered discretionary. When the report is a recommendation to the City Council the terms "should" and "shall" are intended to inform the City Council that if they approve the recommendation the items should be mandatory to preserve the intent of the decision. nr-E.I..1.I.r.I... SIMI x Ir11.•.a sr. PYRe.•./.IYI MM WO STOU r4rt Yy Nr• r---- 1.1.1••IW.Y N.Nees. O.= l0Y•{]•ITI d u•IYw oo.e•' I s•.y•r.. 14111212:raCJIXSO d Du..wr a a a b I I J a 1 C 6. I ' ' U] twee tr$t_' Pe es.S a•!' ,Y .,, Q a k0„ ,.i^a .:.s '.feat + ..:u i Rt••.c a ilk NJ r L.N«w MOW a1 t E , •tP. ` • f gip' w ......F..;i'..s ......e-„ t ` r` !A- r. LION w..e.. i I 1 y 1 wa_14•.NM o D I V p- ... yw•, W7'f y au.aw.'w Ti s+.srw UJW f E r -+Z,.i lam.` .t[www[ K: - '''f.. s 7'. k' K d i 6i;?f. a _yft.,' .• E Y e- - cr EXISTING SHED ROOF ZjF.e,s w'i. S s.eyi+7g'ii lftrl l' y JYewNNW C J(` l/r * r..itij` ; ` .`yT•. r^F F.rY!t>;A" t'l. iawirt- v:7'4''•t4,. Fi o ,6. V U f s}. 4,r f C4i a.ww.c.....7 7.:` At ems•rr Z.., ` - ,,:g•bc-s.;; t f, I w trrv, , .err < ,f F. ui I-- i w} • f•r _ / T ,Yya.,^ {`Yh1.,_1 v. : c.I a1, W I f. 1.. I. i- I. i:• I 2 tom-_i ., x e.., q a. r - - S H a 4 +- eer..ra G'7y' Tc'r[?. ..A .' .F .F'{?rJRii> . q C Y•.r^• r lal•..•r•ee...r P 11' •‘'c ~ K r% salt`X to K y V CO r..I..www 1 It f F>• ih L r tI• i 04 O •.1 rem. T 4 Z: i. Y x<f - i - Y G 3'...`+ 7 i.»e• .y,! v•ti/ d'•'- - q...,-,T-3"C°-1 4. 4'`-.. 4yAlc". •.,' fir-.d y c ' V 1) I t»'`•7 Rr Tr3;x,.lR'..'" S 'r r - J Y DIY,' ., ,_ Z r„ _ ...-A.Et G'-.i .M4.y '• MANAGERS QUARTER• O U ....Y S.rew•N I sr x• 7.r- :_. N and OFFICE U J 1 i•_C_ '...r nee •., -. M' ; I i ;• J M.i'17"W O•.O•• 1 1 Earn I [.IrW M.rr IV wnl-r•.1h...n• o a/o.T. j 0` E• tY}• /r •N • W. I W Z EXISTING CONCRETE 6=- 4 • e.Y1w WO•7ar.•. 1 BLOCK BLDG. W Cl) w WWI w..rw.7•.we.•......r s'td•rrw WINSI l..l•E L-- r L.....w belles Z W RIC I en SITE PLAN a Crow rr.A•rr.r• tf.1.lFT ;,ice, +"=• . I ETA .': !a.-o•• t,ar 1 L,1. 1 j f} F• LOT SUL 0••A.a Legal Ea•G[IDdOn C_ ; - I, I 1 • LOT COVINAGl r—.r— TA...e..•O.root el IA.east 104 toot•1.e••, 1N q, tie yffi'_ rilo.ao: ••S e:D»••.ti 1.r1....•owl.•...•.•y. I.•..W...•. l e . A -iP.1 " .^4r R Zi+. ctwE: .•• 10•I w.n. I. .. .•.r•r I. .1...0..u.•r t' 14 [" g _11/ a-_ 1•V".k.. 1.411..SIT. .•.r xa.. .w.•...I..... 1 1 3 s P•..IRG 11[OUTA[D:It• 0 Y a I.II ]• J.a.,Coyote.F•. •••• r•N.•.e,.N 1 61 . ' . 1• , 4 +- f'ACTUAL a toe Awed 20 tool tor reed• 111..rl I e UILGIRO ARIA: 1 1 r PRAp. 14200 At R I— CONSTRUCTION i71e: 7.e..r<IW17.•rlw.II) ssI R'It.A.a. E •I PRASE! IEI••••.II. P A_ i OCCU•ARCT: •.TARE.-STORAGE I .•7•1 1 ' I- • TRAY! SI.O.•.n. IS WE•e•1OIRC!ewe OPTIC/ • f' .' 1 - 1 f rotes re.••a n- TYP.LIGHTING STANDARD rONIRG. Si VICINITY MAP 1d3a DNINOL7/7^'!Gltf78 pia1. 98616 T 'U Pi f 1 11 .• •' w CEll 7/ w o••r 1r w .00 w• yew.62•127T 1 a •-d :? . ..I 1/0tip i•' El J,0 Ob I U) e REM I•TOlT STORAGEOic. O L..) O ' a rLand•,•••nnt. vV N\s a 1 c..a.«. also 1.•••Ip E-• j..-- i I, I. NEM I/To.ITOI.OI 1 0 i D. H EXISTING SHED ROOF U CO i c IltmailidvpiF OWCL I Q I Y T —'v C p' O 2 z co O ff C•ertVl d Main I 0 ) I W' J s•I..a.•gd WSW at v/) I E,1arb..'case sell Coo U PEG t STORY.TOtaaa II! O I1, if i i MANAGERS QUARTER` W U F'7 L• -.i:k_ -'''"'@ and OFFICE V Z i j ;.. t V i ::,>. , s u•or•w .00lEr_ :3j l: i y !.at '" • I; J 0.--- aawa•.Iareawlws I Z I t al I EXISTING CONCRETE W U a.I./M.MPI w w n e..eaa T. .Ite I1 VVV.— a.bMae Mn Iwo"'Lees•••••NOW I BLOCK BUILDING F i O Q e___. LANDSCAPING PLAN NOTES LI v Wc.Lo---,PAW,hoc aceaK n...T`..0 O. _ PLANT KEY aw'~•iwr'.',se a.rva• ..I s:..a/O.rear,J•• c.a w .,C..o •ry O i'r p Z:OC- 7L.•.vL 70 9:re. a..w..o w.vooat+ 2•"-- Oa..m...w0.7.wsa tiro:../ea V. cg. 7,6"ly l.oiM7aw O Y•j'.'• Lwn lL/eew a.T• M• i5 iuer 11.... .w 7a .e., 1 L(n..LPUM rvw0. ' K a O r.". 1 T i..•........twal wY.•aL.w..4.•iG1Yu... e_{..hi.ZY.L+ MO. —_ s_ ' L I.tY/..T M4. 7. h'"».... w`".•.•.d.o of 1 I r.:r. v OM.L,..nMnn o1i.sl r L Vr. ^:::?".... , 7.-,, 1 Irmo y-r'.:`L`•"1:" "'.`.- S:! S:v t:Os. ......... J' E__• fixI r. a•n •_^.e=t2—e'•..=1P •'S,_ qvs ROC,n yfT aa .t....b amp,. I 1 0a•••••••••~es N... 111111-1W-- r --77...'"rf-__ iiIMMMISOMI.1. t 1.11.....111.11.1& 7-'-- ,-_. - i 7 1 11iI y. - — 111144.•. - 11 t ri' malmitit-'.— -7..e.ir 4 l't...3.' lit: 4".. - _!----'-- -. ---1 -----t —,--, tia;" -- __4. . ::1--:1-7. ' 1••- --. ! I.'ik. ---1 ----:::- 1:4' ---- ----- 4 . i -_ izi---041 i!... ' ' f iii "‘ -- - i"---7`-----_ .i ,11----t-----,--,- 4._,P•gt.t -k-,1111------- filAikIt0, a • - _ 11 --- — A .. 0I II f;-at I AI - - ea,- • fe - ce mr _ 1 EMOV.41.101,*Mt, 00.....OM Oft.W.I.OM•••MOM mews.•••••.01•10 WEST ELEVATION 114••••....mat 0.••••••••,MINIM maim.MM. r.,I,... .. 4_._ __ i-- _______--„,„ „.„--„ 4,- so, i it 4%7 1 Ita L II ... Al _ 1• 1 irg"-- -- • -W-•.1. - " -'------ =-111 li + - --.. Illfg 4 4 4 1 1,74' i 1 ) w 31 „j• ___--=1 ill N t s!' ts I. 'I/ 1 A •-• ii:r..-.1101M 11 -:----— ,.1- --=----• F.-- _.,--...-r7 -‘ t VI 1 ,e, \ \ 1°251°ITIMIIIMIIIM.112111-t 1 k... ' r.-- i 7‘ -,e.. ::.I s VW.- M.N. KIVA I f---- e,r-Irk•-7,- 7.... L-, -. *.--""-.,. A ...,,..„......._J ..... ....._ _ - ,.....,,.......,_ z-,-7-- Ili -7 I..sr ft.•........... . I .." 1"' 10.....e••11•••••••••••••••••••• Nays.*....0 Yuan..10 4••••••••••Corm.._____./ SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION IN.. as..••••••••••MIRO. i 1 77_-=-_ -------, li 1it. 111•••I•••v.••••• 1 or• 1 1 , g.----,--. ----..--- -,- ----- 4 ' e......—/ EAST ELEVATION w GMS ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS CU-030-86 yi II 7 illi li 52. I ' r mil' I• t.21,1.., 1.•' 1 •» .r1 I 4, •3•..•. iI in.i..,. •a _ , 1 WII.R --'i . •11.. J G1t1( r t.' i l 11 t i" ' •.. +. b.5 , rF D.r '; t -- 1 ; . 1- to. s R—V f'+• li s'1•• • r •; '4S KIWANIS i r-_.— -`__ _••y 1 •.• i7. ,i' Lr4, : it,:i-:-.:'-!: 7':• '•/•,/ • T '' PARK Jj•• % fI , f • ' I Irski..Jiy 1- , Jf.J'•E-_1 her •1•`-' ' •t y v•.: t LC v: ii at 1 J 4 i it 131Z I i L.:7. y. tI. a. Itrrr 1 4. ,R . i O W T •. far• I 1, 1 i. i .,1,_ .,!-‘•,..'n, _.7. i ,*.t- 4 - 11 . • r i' 1',''''::.'.C• . i • .j .'a •• IirCr ,.. • 1 l.•y. a f! f• _. _ _ ._ _ ti i F. O , 1 , {T F 7,1 t . "! A..i1 H I .• I I ra 1IIr' L<, 1',• • 1.,! I 1, I . I I_t.JJ ••11.1 111i.-11J r_t__: ter r+11J.._.. i' J T 1iii ri_ 1 R_2l'... T R-3 Su lECY B— 1 ,.. . . S- IT E t--'11;,H,.... H( 11:1:1LONL:' ; 1414k4N11: 111 . 1:'\ T il [' I ! I7 ` NE 4rs ST 1 - r 1 L 1,,• ' t I r1 J o P F 1.....r 2 I,i, , l L; 0 E Er,J'V DOD _ {I j 1Cvr1 . •1 L [ LI? 1' r 1G-1 1R-3 II/, 4y r 4 11— — —it• to IG- 1.11 R-3 G1- 1 GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP CU-030-86 APPL I CANT GMS lARCVITECTURAT, GEoUn TOTAL AREA ± 1 R _ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 4TH ST EXISTING ZONING RTTSTNF.SS USE, R-1 EXISTING USE EXISTING RTTIT.DINC; FOR STOT 1GF. _AND MATNTENANC'F, PROPOSED USE MINI-STORAGE BUILDING COMPLEX COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMTT.Y COMMENTS 2425Z CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JUNE 3, 1986 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP Application for approval of a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a mini storage building complex in a B-1 District, file CU-030-86; property located at 3408 N.E. 4th Street. 2426Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JUNE 3, 1986 APPLICANT: GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP FILE NUMBER: CU-030-86 A.SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval of a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a mini-storage building complex in a B-1, Business District. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Connwill, Inc. 2.Applicant: GMS Architectural Group 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached)3408 N.E. 4th Street 4. Existing Zoning: B-1, Business Use 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1, General Use; R-3, Residential- Multiple Family; L-1, Light Industrial; and P-1, Public Use 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Medium Density Multiple-Family 7. Size of Property: 1.8 acres 8. Access:N.E. 4th Street 9. Land Use: Property consists of a building used for storage and maintenance. 10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Residential Uses East: Commercial Uses South: Cemetery West: Residential: Renton Vocational Technical Institute C.HISTORY/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation 1480 April 29, 1954 Rezone (GS-1 to B-1) 1510 March 8, 1955 ti D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water: An 8-inch water line is located along the west property line. b. Sewer: There is a 12' sanitary sewer line near the west property line. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water flows into an existing storm water drainage system. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP, FILE NO. CU-030-86 JUNE 3, 1986 PAGE 2 2.Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3.Transit: N/A 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: N/A b. Middle Schools: N/A c. High Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: N/A E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-711, Business District (B-1). 2. Section 4-748, Conditional Use Permit. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Commercial Goal and Commercial Areas Objective and Commercial Structure and Sites Objective: City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, p. 16-17. 2. Northeast Renton Plan, City of Renton, Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, p. 55-60. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1.The applicant, GMS Architectural Group, representing the firm of Connwill, Inc., is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a 64,986 square foot self-service storage warehouse in a B-1, Business Use, zone. The development would be on a 1.8 acre site. Actual lot coverage would be approximately 54 percent totaling 43,041 square feet. Approximately 1/3 of the storage area will he located on the second floor of the new structures. The facility will be built in three phases: The first phase will consist of remodeling the existing 15,200 square feet of building that presently occupies the site. New manager's quarters will be constructed in the southwest corner of the lot as part of Phase I. Phase II will include the construction of 28,186 square feet in a two-story building located to the east and northeast of the primary structure. These buildings will be connected so that they will appear to be one physical building. The third phase would total 21,600 square feet in a one story and two story building. This building would be an addition to the north of Phase The applicant has not estimated a completion time for all three phases and how each of the phases will interface for the total appearance of the site. 2.The Environmental Review Committee has issued a declaration of non-significance. Their decision was made on May 7, 1986 with the appeal date expiring on May 26, 1986 at 5 p.m. 3. In the review of a conditional use permit, the Hearing Examiner must consider eleven criteria established for conditional use permit review as stated in Section 4-748(C). The applicant has provided a clear and substantial analysis of the eleven criteria. The Building and Zoning Department does not feel it is necessary to specifically address the positive merits of that discussion at any further length. The applicant's points all appear to be accurate and appropriate from the viewpoint of the staff. PRELIMINARY REPORT Tom, 1 HE HEARING EXAMINER GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP, FILE NO. CU-030-86 JUNE 3, 1986 PAGE 3 However, two issues arise in the actual development of the site as a result of the strict interpretation of the Zoning Code, Section 4-711(B)(3)(n), and the ultimate phasing of the proposed project. ISSUE: ROOF-LINE: 4. The Zoning Code specifically requires that self-service storage facilities be located entirely within one building. The Public Works Department has commented that the proposed roof connection between the buildings anticipated being constructed in Phase III cannot occur because of possible maintenance to the water main that needs to be looped through the site. A structure cannot be located over the water line. There does not appear to be a specific reference in City Code that prohibits the construction of the building over the water line. The Public Works Department contends it must be able to maintain the water line and possibly dig it up without the limitation of an overhead structure. The applicant has responded by specifically including in their design a removable roof section for the repair of utilities. This fully meets the intent of the zoning and provides the flexibility for the Public Works Department to repair the water line. However, the Public Works Department insists there should not be a roof structure whether permanent or temporary over the water line. It appears that the Public Works Department is being unrealistic when considering that the new water line should not need repairs for a substantial period of time and that repairs would most hopefully happen once or twice during the life of the building. If annual repairs were anticipated where the water line would have to be dug up, then it would point to the fact that the standard the City uses for water line construction is inappropriate. Therefore, the Building and Zoning Department cannot agree with the position of the Public Works Department based upon the apparent frequency of necessary maintenance that would require the removal of the roof. ISSUE: PHASING: 5.The actual scheduling of phases and how they appear during the development sequence is important as part of the conditional use process. The applicant has shown three phases, but without an anticipated time schedule. Management of the development of the project may be complicated by unknown factors relating to time. What happens to the area of the lot after Phase I is developed? How long will the site remain partially developed without commitments for the final development? A facet of the same issue is the concern by the Building and Zoning Department that the site is undeveloped and could be used for the storage of motor vehicles. If there is a significant period of time between each of the phases as a result of economic considerations, each of the phases should be linked so that it appears that the site is complete. The problem arises that the proposed landscaping along the north and west sides of the buildings should be compreted after the buildings are constructed. However, the undeveloped portion of the site during Phase I and II should be screened from the apartment area to the north and west. It also appears that the frontage along N.E. Fourth Street could be developed in phases. The Building and Zoning Department feels this would not be within the intent of the specific zoning provision that requires the facility to appear as one building. 6. Various City departments have commented on the project proposal. Those comments are attached for the general public's and Hearing Examiner's review. The primary issue was whether the building structure should continue over the proposed water line. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP, FILE NO. CU-030-86 JUNE 3, 1986 PAGE 4 Emergency fire access has been provided through easements to the adjacent multiple family area to the west to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. However, those easements have not been finalized until approval of the conditional use permit is granted. A copy of those documents have been included in the yellow file for the Examiner's and City Attorney's review. The fire access to the subject site through the adjacent property to the west will require some modification of the parking arrangement for the apartment complex. The apartment complex was constructed prior to the City allowing the use of 25 percent compact spaces and, therefore, only a restriping of the parking lot will be necessary to allow total functional use. 7. In conclusion, the conditional use permit request as submitted appears appropriate based upon the eleven review criteria and the above analysis. There is a definite need for facilities of this type in the general area because of the increase in multiple family dwelling units and the needs of the general population. The architect's creativity in placing the facility within one apparent building and blending the structure with the adjacent developments is the best example to date of the implementation of the policy to allow self-service storage buildings in the B-1, Business Use, zone. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above-analysis, it is recommended that the conditional use permit request, file CU-030-86, by GMS Architectural Group be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Full development shall occur within a five-year period. 2.The vacant portions of the site between the phases shall not be utilized for vehicle, equipment, or material storage. 3.The landscaping installed with Phase III along the northern and western property lines shall be of a size equivalent when installed to the existing landscaping proposed on Phase I. 4.All of the proposed development in the southern 48 feet of the subject site shall be developed as part of Phase I. This specifically includes all of the landscaping, asphalt and fencing necessary. In fact, the southern wall of the building proposed for Phase II should be constructed at this time to create the general appearance of the proposed building elevation. 5.The proposed removable roof section for the repair of the domestic water line utility should be approved per the plans submitted. 1. 1 1( 2: rR.s . L, ''1.1'i-i 'J i..._. .•.i.'a° 1.11t'1°I•I• I ' SI l aft, .-j' •r--.-,F :LLfl,l•cs1•i,1•1: [ 4—, , at ' . Va i/• . ' • ,1':} KIWANIS t a tt-, u _ DARK 2 1_,'; L......_.z. •,,,.... f !. 5 ..ApAk Nliri• -, r. .,si 1 1 :::: h a a, 5 w \• I:'. cLEMENTAR, CHOJ 1 , I t a S • i l B q ,o I. 1 5'.5 ' ) • o f Si1 1 ;{ I I I , L 1 f R-.1. 1-- _ ' i f I I ell .0 iiiii r , ) 17 I.? lo ' s •'•-!r slel .a l. j tl f I• ft • f jf j• f)`_t_ R A f- , I W 7. If f 1 - E 1.1J .., .I)•y).-• z I y,' .!, T.' `, 'V );y Z • y u • to t `,r 1 r II V r J 1_ Wf. f Il (- _N E 10 I. .. 1.F f- _ { . . 8 ' iJ341f' itil I'.I,fit4.0.•LI - f7-- I 4.1. .•..i.•, l 111.1„'tit.lttif.] j•j°L 11 ti-. -- r s' i It ru•f. t IC ,__,i R2 l 1R-35u lECT H • rM by H, 2.. v. ;)r---- z E. l , IB- 1 \ i 1iOCAll Nr.t , TII(_Hjj 4!'i. 1bk. li NE 4T+ ST rt f- s L.1 P— T c, z j C.1 E E N W OO D I ,' I 11 n I I i r- . .1 L VERY 1 I i G-1 J r 1 R-3 c— i V P-R:3 G+ 1 GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP CU-030-86 APPL I CANT GMS _XRCHITECTTRAT, GROUP TOTAL AREA ± 1 R ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 4TH ST EXISTING ZONING RTTsrNESS TTSE, R-1 EXISTING USE EXTSTTNG BTTIT.DING FOR STORAGE AND MATNTENANCF. PROPOSED USE MINI-STORAGE BUILDING COMPLEX COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MEDTTTM DENSTTY MTTT,TT-FAMTLY COMMENTS 1)1 W LAND U : ELEMENT et:, v 1 A Single Family Commerci Low DensityL-•-1 r 'r ` Multi-Family Ws Office / Of :e Park yid'•c•c r:N c < cRS:c,'. G t c c o ci o00°0°0.. G a w r *.:` Medium Density 0000000 Public/ Qua: -Publicwrc0000000• fey y r r w.• :•T;. Multi-Family o000 0. off'. G• x` ^' :G c>'C High Density Light Indust ialJ Multi-Family 000 t o 0o° ii iit.'" Recreation Heavy Indus :-ial ii/1rrE, 1 f. F[, xW '° Greenbelt Manufacturing Park 1c11 ::1 ,,,,,(,f Multiple optiont may_; .r ti w mpge` i.u moo u ii,.... GMS ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANT• S III:1ra°1 u11• 0000• ru•. u'i000o0o000 '1 "Jtr''rii CU-030-8Ei° 0000r_ ii.i.,._ I Itismi pp 6y OOoo Oo I I ' o i wi.:..... omen00000000°o°c \2 3jI . . ,, 00000 o 00C Qf• iiri 9.1 i II 000000 y 0 L 0 Ain` .... 1 PIJ o 000• 00 u EC T'lim 03'u L .,.0 . 0000°0000 1 oaoo 014 alikli I T E a• Nipil II_... • fir::" g 1 44, L‘ 1 1 tt,011 o• .. • • iosamiii------ rl 0,,, m1 L_______, rTa 0 eetillt Nroc,:o.: 0.00.0. ::::iii......-...- ......:::::::::.::::: .....;:i s,. .e. , c-:•:::• 0000000000 1. 0000v00000.0o0oc0ocOc v nuo0000000oo•0000000 00o0000000o•o0 00 00 00 111000000000.00000 0000000000000.000000000•00000000.0000000000 000000000•0000°° O•.''..... 000000000.0000000000 00 • 11111 Cb060000000.00000000.00000.0000. •.: ;:; '00• 000000. 0000000000000000000. I....I.._ ,l I 00• 0000000000000000000• 0000• ...Y i;:}jy:.j?::' •0000000000000000000 • 0000 OOOOOOOOOO000000000• . I . f1• r00000• 1 000000000000000000•II 000000000 ( . 00000• 00000000 0000.000 0000° j 00000000 j I • 0000 000 0000• i 00000000000000000 7':, 0000°°° I 000 ooO P Tr J 1.. t gip• '` >;'t"<q F.,_•• ) 7 , n,•:i';i•LJ> • I. ."d.• t• yr',^n-1!.;4 ^".iJ ' ••.:.' • ;if[7.'. .:o..c. .'c :•c'0,i4:''.0' Jim 1e-,.4 •,)••_ , „, ,'.. ,. •.or•3'.••t:,}'U ,art {,0,- rg'tfe •••''rfij,?`i`,•f.t3 t. J ,`{':.ib;,,cl.`1 , •,; v r ' Ijn;f 1( a i°^ w '• N. t' t" f"f`°; ( r';\ SY+c;• Q-,0,,t,• :4v. '''•..7 -•>^ ? 1,9 L•rT" • /e3• --•. 1 i, t'';.`} . E'^e!H..t,j•it 7, .:tg".,`l'; c(- rF?e k,ti R ^ • ff'. t+Airi r;, } r jF •F en•. a ,nor liar::;^, . 7: c t3..<.•0,< ^a) ii7. 4''yc`C T .r.• ^i •4-:•,? o%3 r f 1 tr3„`t•cf }. tiU ) i)N(4`L X• .Y `,f.' V c O. J° A.) .; SC y, oE:'eG?;r.' IS .°.,`l;, . ; .fj,•rV 3. So' s, •U, 74 l4 y' T,_a:f • l!•. r. 7.• T-. 1f. '';: i. ^ '• s• r °•1?',. 79[ t nib,^ o•4ii fat?i.,.• ,„.- _t>tu.!,,. t - -a' f.M.' i:o. 9 w^ l• ' t .i' t.)„` ll' U' ('n,i`, '• hn[1 ',t`a„t{t;'•,'„Y,`i;'*„ l't•^' 4 I t. yak.. n •,‘,, f' "''! t ',o3 tzi,. 'el)o f3'. , r. i1. R t_ ' N. F, j^ A'.o,oii. t f.i`•ti o ce c r r.. c e' t ii... •0000°°° a•ft cci,•, S,aT..: `I . Y',C'iCt •^ aa.. r.r[•CC .trrt `• r p 0000°• 1; '` all•tt, •fA a.'•,1• f•..! 000 000 ini,)a•, A. 000• °•4•;` o•u000'. t•[`4 •'r:`' t:' C r'ry .fee , Fh.• .. ft). t' e.)]j Y 1,.**o'..3'- t>.o;,,o.. c. tC(f Am 000000• N. 0000000, 1 o EI'j nn;'•<. c ;4 cof?'.jjk y'a tr.• 0000•• 4 1 4.. ,'\' 70 ':q• c , 1 1 OO 000• /. t 9,f • n•tt,..ti rI•Y). 3 fit?, . 5+,.i a 00 N^4,•.,,,t,fe ••i, . ,,•sV,0•` 1 .,.Ct ,.. Y'' 4ri 1,0000°° 1.', ,2 4. t+:'[ C 3•t.),,,,!.e,• ?':,' S .{ i)} f..' iV L),c fir- .Iy;ti. I s.0000 l!'i3 t. i, [ 1.;,:oi. a'Y•}'•tl' a. 1*.. 00000 1 'or •et,:• .., .33,.•,.,•• ft,[ 2to°t ,{ s•<3 7 C` 0000 n. t, 'l S:d. ti,'. i ' r t, ) ° oo°o°o'. C:t;`J";C3SY'Q•( i. Ji:;i;3 7 7 tom•' tad. t +^ 4:U•.LS• .,l , k j• ,a• ' •.•. .! 0'17' C' y •i' "O 4c •ti t i- e .:(n4nn• %at o >>[ ta•0000°° c il3 i \ t)">ut;):i o°°Ooo t}, F.,; •! ,r,. `f ',V.tt ' >1. ';i ;>,.•0Zyt•a.,y,•re, _ ')000000cra i[7• :r,.a•1 ••. il's . 0.. .'[)t b. 7,e ° S i: 0000 °° ooc t t+• ( Ili 4 ru.ir .. t", fIl Lilk ttfi;• ou0m000o0o00,[ ^ o ti i i/. , 31.,:'.al,..... o. A k A lac ONINOZi9Malln8 •irk\ 9861 c T c? y:_ .ir. 1 f 1 - .{ M.w Ib.N rM Ea1aN lima.—\ J .,,0! ur.axaxn j.. ? U) n n w .00.ae' E, A. 3 0h 03 la-NE a STORY STORAGE OQa i UI CrL.M.c.p.Mato. r Cw Cw.nala O f Wag.a...io, a H P ew I a w a - M,. -I n.--i o Ew:STORY eroR Aoe I C"_... ww a I EXISTING SHED ROOFtutCT U CO i zr . s s VO". WI X I T ^ z I ch i.I•I el C.wt,...Na$E 1 0 p VI z' ' S.Lanes...Soo. T E.letln..'<.n•..la 0 U i3y 4'a71 rJ a NEt t O 1 r 1 1 ,, I I MANAGERS QUARTER W U t s'. • = I ,=^ 3. r :L. Z.: a' ' +Q i and OFFICE it U Z J in I .. e: J , . la cc J I EXISTING CONCRETE C J U I l.tl.e eat.far Npe....... l.l..a., . E.i.11n.,.• e'L.SMaa0 w.dl I BLOCK BUILDING I. CIEa o I p Q C7 LANDSCAPING PLAN j, _ ¢ I i NOTES 2 O 0 er a e....e..oeraAa wAa+r.roc vcaK n....T..r.v h = PLANT KEY s ..,..5 G• / e,--- a w.s:....w. WI 4.rc..r a..'.ve•... 1 ACti co aa...". wal...Y.raa..... l m.oa—c.. -.e.P ......-r v e+x v..lv.wa..Ira T.M.S.. a. f.D.a. um... 1.....-t.a.A.,baA...-adv..a-6,....e..6n..I.e.p St, 1 7 '.'''v't i.:e ave.Vva'' 0 3.5'Y` r wM.7., Ota.Jo.lfAa II.t....ay- I ...S/5.1ao— aeo,tw+ ...TO*:erf s.'w a rl..ra.a'bN.1.LL...+o..0,.. wx..nM I •- Y wn.l a.v—pT-.wa.. wroti w M''' r rwe.w•sr OR r...Fl..1 w•ea.ti T.aauw.« . nsG .a4a.Y M a.•Oe Z4M ow, ..J•v W sWwJM t..+'41..t•n.[.d. ...._. 3,me'...-........ D 2- T.t m• q {I{. z r,.O.C-1[a-_Lt tlIS.G TREE/LAPI.) 0'..bp,..7 SIAM MOOT.LAND.O.m.er.K...liwpa. a.-!•t••1•••re by/ma poi,- 111 ZelYe I N l.cd?Ci JNINOZ/r)N!011f18 ;I! sZL to i SE 40 S.a I E•I• laI.11N,ewe•4.•r•^•••. w 33a= loelowner Nues.BOMeNMe•etw -1 e••NaN N rf t.'ir-j / _no ss•' 4r «t_ I wrww-.-n..L v.,. 11 9 n ..-; r : Lp., 51 f-y, 1,. ,. i ! ... , .._,,),, .. i1L 9 ._ ie? h 1 z•.re t lier t[ u.y:..sA er V7 e, [ 1 Z t3 I _ I r''.err- '`ri'P ' t .; IL F C . 7. 'a.,. , LI i Y L.l.••a••belt.. E- 4- 1 4 k O n- „ L _ .- te-.. G' , :' R"'" " 1 l_ ., w 11, a ems. v r r.. k.. <• '__ 7,Tri { I z r. e beer.,. I ll1 e.AwtnE..e 1 41 itt'o car a'raaesm. IJ1• L. 4 ".X' \,"c.s''' g-+. :sue .''ld'. 's I EXISTINHEDROOF a.....ea .n F W te. , q ~. n :sty: a• - i cn 1• Ei 11 1_.1 Court's.' < C^ xa .J$r4C rt z•...T.1 <=1 ? H rs- i A¢- -iA M. S.:: 7t},., IF3M'- 1 EA1•,b••'••w..aa rZ ,.0 if 1: . V e-t '!.- 4 >•' At. a'!.- r i111f1 L ? 1yP ,.fi 5t.,YZ "J_ 1 Y.. 4J it,J+i S'-C) CO reef...,.: iE. e sir c+ - . , t . Y rr.+$V 1 KC O . N.+olu•. f s,y..::.Fif ay c_ x,•,:.:a. .^ "."o tr v.C. .r _ M mow M+ 1-w a r r,-•• ,..7.1 _^ I1_ O f:-- ' sw o ni T.. P•d" } Ts4+r _ a s CO I 3 L :r•- r o-'• ' 1;-. r r, s 1 1` }Y_ ka• -• S..•.r'4"'•4 ' ,.. 1411 MANAGERS QUARTER 7- U U •n..,•.......•• 3 N.-. 7. and OFFICE V J CC rf .. . - J r .:[ '•! ... r `r r k'I R•.'' i I i tz w aoo.o•' e•nn••Na•.•r,a wenl-taah.Rne d i E o ow°o14 W ZV CO Z I i 1 i I4"Ii I• I j i EXISTING CONCRETE ! LL V Lr V - I - E•I•u..1N•.•aew. I 2 e i BLOCK BLDG. LB co CI wan,• ...mom.,••IM•b uu••t S'Lendoer•.r.tw •1 I•W. 1_ •'Lub•y belt•. Ui Z U n SITE PLAN Cky n J Ao.,n. • 1.. }i,, `11' sr:. airsetat': EO-0" I\ "' r i ii .i ` rv1 ."- .. t w 1 LOT Sae: wo:2 us a Legal description is - ;„ _ I 1 LOT COVERAGE 17•"' • TA••m 400 1 a1 1 tn••.•1 200 I•. . . 13 Si: _•a Y r YfB ACTUAL.' • e\ 430E0 N.L w t• '•• ^ •' 1 n••a•1 ••cr•• arN I- _ T_ t.+ N= 1)wOMI In.a •••0 lLy •Ty` 11 nw.WY* ACTUAL s•• 0a1•..n. r.rwr o . L' f h w•wW. bet•.1 nen a 30 n• r •.. PARKING REQUIRED. (1 Boat•/30D0 N w.non) 3. rs •NI^ • 1 a.•:••01 t •n• t /( i.. ar;1 ACTUAL. is a oD 1 Lr read I. E+11 ..). .Ire E •' ii !XZa.:_1 7. SI E, a '• _4BUILDINGAREA. II ammo' CONSTRUCTION rvwE. V I no r(lolly•r .0 f,. t _ T ! .-y! - V R.:ASE t t•teo.•-R 0 RILE 1r1L1r ea• e III ram,: Q_P wNASE 3 3.166 ee.n. a ' ra rr---• fra r 11-.j Ct-! ••~•-- OCCUwANC.- •]^NS.-.TORAGE L t. I 1.E CIIMASS. 21.00.l , R0 NANAOER':RESIDENCE•n•O.IICE -' 4! I•'ttl. E TOTAL r••••t.ft. TYP.LIGHTING STANDARD 205010: Di VICINITY MAP r, T 0.- p Tom_— Mh i_a t....' t vre. s... 1![ - J RL_IA..._ } 44 - . . L RID_ --- - c 41 1--7_m-viat••- _ Lr 4f — + WEST ELEVATION Al / .,.. 3 r• 5..„ ,,,,,...„,,..„_ -__ _.-.i,_,,„ te v a lir. +. I. , _ " E IL_ — 41.? V 4.i la 110 Itnit AN lap.,HIS.—.•..•-.... r........ 1•..-•....•r.-- w...•..•• I C—.... SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION l' u- I W---c it EAST ELEVATION c«.... GMS ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVIION :BC_D Ei APPROVED D. WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED i. 14 61---0 J,61 " 1r 4 v:ezA v=1 Dr Al. . 9e. D6 e-a ciN 4 ,..v a& 7-y - 45 f i t r SK A(ic_ i,1 _/ l F p1zir7,1V1/0 roc C L 4 aL-D n Je 6 ec er_eiti DATE : zZ SIGNATURE OF RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/191 >_ Fo: 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : L 11)//U6, El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED u12. LE-7/ OF 4) C) w-\rA-\ '+00 TyNL..L GTZoL)1 t AC,Oit%1 2CU5 TRW:T2 A- .O4U6 1( )C'(',j H 5' t.,CES1 PRO roEhty L) n} Roo C fLA/v i1106 o I. eJl IZ- - LkiV G1 DATE : 4.1g° -io SIGNATURE OF D'ITOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/19E For 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLlY Lc(fecJPin AvT- I ) APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ii NOT APPRO ED le k,/,,ai". . -(e) . sG - 1)5 kr6661‘, g'776;"!,' 7%,,,47.14,2g : s- 4 A r - 0 1-.:,,e‘.. i Ntl' 11 t 4o 4 ST(;NATIIRF fly fTRF('T(1ROAU 7FT1 RFPRi '•1TATTVDATE : L REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI ON : 7J77/-/Ty i1/, -,E'/Aldo flAPPROVED Ei PROVED WITH CONDITIONS RINOT APPROVED rJ -/IS 4014J0 Lm YAL SUBJECT TO I LATE ONES AGREEMENT-lCT't y • w-23e 1. 717/x 240'_ 4/3 9. 2 LATE CURS AGREEMENT-SE'w:.i NO SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE •WA 1'--, L )'&s oo.44/5l5•FT. X irD, 032''- 0,3 20/• ?g SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER _ y,,ES vie.D¢/ 4./7: 3,2D/• 2e SPECIAL AUNT AREA CIO PE-WATER w HO p,¢02. 5Co , SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEVJ /V IAPPROVED WATER PLAN YE5 APPROVED SEWER PLAN 7 EA. Side 5 E -C YL. Afr fli JAP; 0VED FIRE NYDRAi;T L CA iOHS 1k.0BYFIREDEPT. j• FL. : AWAIT IS le No 1\ DATE : 5- gz, SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/191 Fo: 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; 0 APPROVED n El APPROVEDAPPROVEDWITHCONDITIONSI1 p o a.r,0-- z L ?( 3Y o Yj ,-=e a 7L e-(72s/d DATE:r SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/198: For- 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :T/i/i-FF-/C_- L—l /C- 11V E. , './A/( 0 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED Le.) i .ie.w 11&.1r'ci LA l'as be, ..at, / 1'' 414%0 A05Zuic..ktil QK i i_ _pm tv,..070o Pc44474•PID 0 i'-yc Ia d , d r i e t.04is J.-etvse- Cie*r ,6y A: '¢ if v y / Sf a/AUe st-, e.E- /17/7 t Eaf: s a Pr e- 141t,fc be_ cam! hi( rt 1 k': v hn d iS f4„c_, 5# pyo -r--t ei;:.:7'---' DATE : /7R /4.-K' SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR CrA rtHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI - -pN ; APPROVED R APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ri NOT APPROVED E'ope,e // /.vs779. .e. F/mot' A€.147. sAe/a//rlzrP C'o.....idc.—,e;Air 47- g>/,coc € A 0c•977CI V 11 0 DATE ; i9a-‘ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/198, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; C—P E APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 1 , a,l.lhP 0\0zit u_Ch o b(u Too,u pro 2 . P, U17.1 A-O k'L o v U l.c`(-% let.k ( C' 2°Cl( j CA-L d \\.1& 1qLu-- S -o C t00V k , DATE: 2rS 4 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Font .82 41 int * 1123N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-026-86 APPLICATION NO(s).: CU-030-86 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for conditional use permit to allow construction of a mini storage building complex in a B-1 district. a- PROPONENT: GMS Architectural Group LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 3408 N.E. 4th Street. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than May 26. 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: May 7, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: May 12, 1986 tilt?.,A Ronald G. Nelson r. Spri 1"^Building and Zoning Director P. icy Develo.Vent Direc or rn Ri hard C. oughton Public Works Director 2425Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON JUNE 3, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION: GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP Application for approval of a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a mini storage building complex in a B-1 District, file CU-030-86; property located at 3408 N.E. 4th Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 3, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : May 23, 1986 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANETTE SAMEK-MC VAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in -<' kjro r\J on the J 7t.P day of May, 1986. J 2 style. C 60-fa70 SIGNED• VI-elk 0 14"47OFJ , ask o pA I 09q1. SEP,oso City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a puotic HEARENI , ,i) in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON JUNF 3, 1986 BEGINNING AT 9 :00 A.M. F M. CONCERNING: GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI STORAGE BUILDING COMPLEX IN A B-1 DISTRICT FILE CU-030-86 , GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 3408 N, E, 4TH STREET FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHO ,!T r r‘nrwiw A I191P ATNAAI RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 026 86 E( F - APPLICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-030-86 PROPONENT : GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP PFOJECT TITLE : RENTON HIGHLANDS SELF-SERVICE STORAGE. BFIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT HALING APPROXIMATELY 64,986 SQUARE FEET ON ONE AND TWO FLOORS. LC CAT I ON : LOCATED AT 3408 N.E. 4th STREET. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : '/h/' ENGINEERING DIVISION 1 TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT pn BUILDING $ ZONIN4 DEPARTMENT E] POLICE DEPARTMENT 0 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED 7] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1NOT APPROVED UODL4rex: - - ,b/.4x- Xirt /.v6 12azourr ; o. 's =. i/ r/L 91 P 6 Co de 4 ' & 7-/-_/ 12 c-- /25. 1j6 r _re( AC1 lug, iF odzm /a te c 4 r 347) 6 5Je_ G.--Ac4 r, , DATE : - SIGNATURE OF RTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/198 For: L82 RENT, BUILDING & ZONING DEPA 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 026 86 ECF - AF P L ICAT I ON NO(S) ; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-030-86 PF OPONENT : GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP PFOJECT TITLE : RENTON HIGHLANDS SELF-SERVICE STORAGE. BF IEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN A B-I ZONED DISTRICT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 64,986 SQUARE FEET ON ONE AND TWO FLOORS. LC CAT I ON : LOCATED AT 3408 N.E. 4th STREET. TO : 11 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : _/Z/E El ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE ; n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT H,ING t ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON RE"IEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED U 2 I Di' OF R6'°1A/ ". t\-)01 G 1Z,OU0 1 N.)6 Co./U) R_at)5 MO 6UC Y )C)I T VJ tA- `y PRO pEh57 y PrPO FLArL t iL G • L ti C, DATE : 4-8° SIC NATURE OF D R TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION i/198! Font 182 RENT i BUILDING & ZONING DEP; 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEE- ECF - 026 _ 86 Cali OF HENT(N APPLICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-030-86 AP_R 2 ). 4 PROPONENT : GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP POLICY t>G>/LI ALLL111T -- PROJECT TITLE : RENTON HIGHLANDS SELF-SERVICE STORAGE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 64,986 SQUARE FEET ON ONE AND TWO FLOORS. LCCATION : LOCATED AT 3408 N.E. 4th STREET. TC : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 5/7/E ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMFNT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLIVY L&lr-c-C.UPpYle AT-- 1 APPROVED 7 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPRO ED 1)5 7 17f-,-47: t‘ 44.-•=7/ 4.1. (1-1 ' ike-e DATE : /47-)gb SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/198; Form 182 RENTS I BUILDING & ZONING DEP, 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 026 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-030-86 PROPONENT : GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP PROJECT TITLE : RENTON HIGHLANDS SELF-SERVICE STORAGE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT HA` TNG APPROXIMATELY 64,986 SQUARE FEET ON ONE AND TWO FLOORS. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 3408 N.E. 4th STREET. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 5/7/< El ENGINEERING DIVISION WTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU l I PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT 0 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :TAinFF/C f llf c. ri APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED DvrI ve wmytU 'd VI o 4 f 411,0 Q u i c-k f' Art'- - P .1-micP AY 47 "s T-r.f o d r%e. &aj5 y,1 Cie.*r Ay Pr t Ve l a ru cih S f 4"c 5 NT, ier DATE : I ;7 (W) SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR ALA HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/198; Fryrr 1 RENT, I BUILDING & ZONING DEPP 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 026 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-030-86 PROPONENT : GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP PROJECT TITLE : RENTON HIGHLANDS SELF-SERVICE STORAGE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 64,986 SQUARE FEET ON ONE AND TWO FLOORS. LCCATION : LOCATED AT 3408 N. E. 4th STREET. TC : I] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 5/7/ XENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : l ( UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU E] PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 11 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 11 POLICE DEPARTMENT 0 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON RE"IEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED I ] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I/ 7 NOT APPROVED et-2) 'ole_ 2z- x3y oYLey L e_j ( C U--- 1 wey/F-‘ DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/198 For, 82 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPASMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET EC F - 026 - 86 AF PL I CAT I ON NO(S) ; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-030-86 PF OPONENT : GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP PFOJ ECT TITLE : RENTON HIGHLANDS SELF-SERVICE STORAGE. BFIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 64,986 SQUARE FEET ON ONE AND TWO FLOORS. LC CATION : LOCATED AT 3408 N. E. 4th STREET. TO : 11 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 5/7/ n ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : lal UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION I FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT 0 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1 OTHERS : CO1MENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMFNT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON RE`1IEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Ir//--/Ty E /,/,&-,E-,%tlN I APPROVED l ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED UTLJOVAL SUBJECT TO I LATE CUM AGREEMENT-WATER y,ES IN 7-3 g g'.• 747/x 200'= g/,3`/9. LATE CMG AGREEMENT-SEWER p SYSTEM/EWBMMENT CHARGE-WATE;c YES,, 2/D e14- 4 .FT X 0, 032_ 03 z0/• 2 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER cs 'D.D¢/SQ.1 j: y ,3,20/. 2 SPECIAL AUNT AREA Ci RPE-WATER NO p ¢02. 5v , SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER NO IAPPROVED WATER PUN 1E5 APPROVED SEWER PLAN 7 EA, St OE 5E.,-)L rt- AP.aOVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS BY FIRE EPT. CI:.:'ti ' ANALY IS N D co. ip DATE : SIC NATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/198 For t82 RENT. 'BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEEV ' C26 _ 86 ICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-030-86 ENT : GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP CT TITLE : RENTON HIGHLANDS SELF-SERVICE STORAGE. EF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLO THE vASTRUCTION OF A MINI STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT HA' 'NG A:;K3XIMATELY 64,986 SQUARE FEET ON ONE AND TWO FLOORS. LC:ATION: LOCATED AT 3408 N.E. 4th STREET. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : _77/8' OENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : l ! UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION XIFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PART ' & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUIL)ING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOL :E DEPARTMENT OPOLJ ,Y DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : l ( APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED 17e "f<ofree a /.4s7-"ch F/tF Ei6T. ,o,e ,t,"er E C'o ...ccT/oAer 4-7- Af/.toc •€.0 A ocAr1c ZIA0k + DATE : G 11 .?.?, ,PKK SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/198 RENT' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 026 — 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-030-86 PROPONENT : GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP PROJECT TITLE : RENTON HIGHLANDS SELF-SERVICE STORAGE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 64,986 SQUARE FEET ON ONE AND TWO FLOORS. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 3408 N. E. 4th STREET. TO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 5/7/- ENGINEERING DIVISION r] TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 1 POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I] OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P . M , ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 2F5 , -- EV 1obmks atAA vU-e-,-*) -40 Lbw TOL,...)t o v o cr 2ti".S E C atfin r-o eu- l- 2 . j u 4 l e c V l lA A-a `C t o v n t., l,t.. •..• oc7— LCUSS 20 0 C,i t, s o r aoov DATE : S:.GNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1C 2 Fc 182 TRAN MITTS AL 1.; . LETTER AlA DOCUMENT G810 x PROJECT: 41 k•Nitt f`\ Cs 1c a JQV( %,l1b- ARCHITECT'S name, address)PROJECT NO:03 DATE: Nu n 4, , a4 TO: rG l•_. 1"er4 t* 1 14I,t If enclosures are not as noted, plc, e VVVIIIWWW• po r LA. Apt• inform us immediately. 55 mt.J If checked below, please: ATTN: L 0w Wp• n Acknowledge receipt ofenclosu Return enclosures to us. WE TRANSMIT: 1st ) herewith under separate cover via in 71ccordance with your request FOR YOUR: approval distribution to parties ( ) information 4 ) review & comment ( ) record use THE FOLLOWING: Drawings Shop Drawing Prints Samples Specifications Shop Drawing Reproducibles ( ) Product Literature Change Order tiOcAtAr ENtS 00 EIStMEJt i Vt#4601 • COPIES DATE REV.NO. DESCRIPTION ACT' CO_ 1 ININ`JO 65 1.4 Oa er OW t4 gik SecTii- CITY OF RENT0.4 1"-q 10 --, 11 \\:1-7-- j -- '-' i INNi...76. it3 Lfg*,11- ek S PSVYNENt 1 MArr2T9-8 BUILDING/ZONING ' I` p'. l i'--- L- -- ACTION A. Action indicated on item transmitted D. For signature and forwarding as noted below under REM,' ,S CODE B. No action required E. See REMARKS below C. For signature and return to this office REMARKS `.NEA, t1/4S en,OVINts‘e ""V4Ail. tbAft- .\\^11.4 LSL4e\ A•AG(Ate-4AM) owtS1-. r.-------- ----..-. . COPIES TO: with enclosures) c a: El2 CeNNwII) )I SC, • BY: MA DOCUMENT G810 • TRANSMITTAL LETTER • APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIA• • C:OPYRIGHT (t) 1970 ONE F ETHEAMERICANINSTITUTEOFARCHITECTS, 1785 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE,N.W WASHiNGTON, D.C.20036 ArdNtaxune•Deeyo•Ptannlas 10717 N.E.41k St.•1 Bellevue.WA 90004 (1061 462.1277 Memberr of file Aweless Inrtltnte of Veto rto 111111 CONNWILL INCORPORATED CITY OF RENT L. April 28, 1986 r5' (ram [ (r, City of Renton Municipal Building MAY 1219' 200 Mill Ave. South 8;11LDfNt;zfl pi Renton, WA 98055 NJNO To Whom it May Concern: We, Hill Top Associates hereby acknowledge that Connwill, Inc. has submitted for a conditional use permit to the City of Renton for property located at 3408 N.E. 4th Street, Renton, Washington, legally described as follows: The South 400 Feet of the East 200 Feet of the following described property: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 23 Novt,h, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, Except the East One Acre, and except the South 30 Feet for Road. We the undersigned are the legal owners of the property described above. Date Hill Top Associates Gale W. Conner, President Connwill, Inc. STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of 4. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Gale W. Conner signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the President of Connwill, Inc. , Managing Partner -- Hill Top Associates to be the free and voluntar act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: '/3 g/ p Cl' 11 C 9J Notary Public in and for the State c My appointment expires 3 Washington, residing at G i/r; ( .' 10709 Beardslee Blvd., Suite#201 Bothell, WA 98011 • (206)486-1455 • Contractor Lic. #CONNW"242P' R AYN 0 N D ! T H MPSON 4101 L/:_/,‘ ,e-ii-J March 4, 1986 N, Mr. Scott Taylor Goodman Management Group 15668 West Valley Hwy. APR Renton, WA 98055 R 3 i986 Re: Cedar Park Easement Dear Scott: As a follow up to our conversation last week, the terms that I have agreed to with Mr. Lewis and his other partners are as follows: A. The easement will be for a plot of ground just outside their gate on our property. B. The cost for the easement is $10,000, payable by cashiers check upon recordation of the easement. C. Mr. Lewis and his partners agree to pay for the re-striping of our entire parking lot and funds for the re-striping shall be placed in an escrow account with specific instructions to be released upon satisfactory completion of the re-striping. D. The easement will be for a maximum of forty (40) years. E. There will be nothing done towards the easement or the recordation of the easement until the City of Renton has completely approved our parking lot plan and new improved landscaping plan, and agree that if we lose 3 parking places to Mr. Lewis, we will still have satisfactory parking, after taking into consideration the re-striping of our lot. REAL ESTATE SYNDICATIONS • BROKERAGE • CONSULTING 3951 South Plaza Drive, Suite 260, South Coast Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92704 (714) 556-2400 Mr. Scott Taylor March 4, 1986 Page Two We will contact our attorneys' in order to draft a satisfactory agreement between Mr. Lewis and ourselves as soon as we have confirmation from the City of Renton to the aspects that I have mentioned above. Scott, this should sum up my agreement with Harry Lewis and allow you to proceed forward with the aspects that you need to take care of. S• re / Pa I Thompson CEDAR PARK PARTNERS, LTD. General Partner 1124N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects: CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (ECF-030-86) Application for environmental review to revise the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Ordinance. GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP (ECF-026-86) Application for conditional use permit to allow construction of a mini storage building complex in a B-1 district, file CU-030-86; property located at 3408 N.E. 4th Street. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects with additional conditions imposed as mitigating measures under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: TRAMMELL CROW (ECF-023-86) Application for site plan approval to build two buildings of 58,000 square feet to be used as office, small retail and limited warehouse, file SA-027-86. Property located on the southeast corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 41st Street. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by May 26, 1986. Published: May 12, 1986 Cam( - 03 0 -86 g^3o ( 7 mD 3mc' »a gill ‹O R m o mm o F'3 0 pm m -no c ?pZZ2AFFIDAVITOFPUBLICATIONn o 5 8. Om D a•Qo o a.-D; -( Y being first duly sworn on oath states that 07 m x D m m Audre DeJoie m-..2 =w `zmrgr he/she is the Chief Clerk of the 0.3. a o f d < mm m- 3onZ 22o< .$ a0„3 VALLEY NEWSPAPERS m * y ° as a 78 0 Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News m a,o m 0 g-A, 030 Aa0„, OFDailynewspaperspublishedsix (6) times a week.That said newspapers A m w' m• a 3 0.0, are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six i 8 g 0,x 0, o D " i months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published N y a o 4 ; ;0'.g. c Oc s. go p'oa cintheEnglishlanguagecontinuallyasdailynewspapersinKent, King o o $ F County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal o a o m w $ .,; d r newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for 33 m.8 f 8.m w(a3 0 a King County. w 5 w ` m.?d c O oma,:, g' ` c c0ao ao'-'0-5m 0 The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News c 3 §-°.3 ?e w m m cD Journal DailyRecord Chronicle X DailyGlobe News incaTU 3 3 , 6 . 3 mandFo b^°° not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its a 0 subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a w w o o Notice of Environmental Determination was published c ao ac$w 8• on Nay 12, 1986 R1575 a 3 „ T CD p 7 ? V al cn-y3 i f The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the g h N w "° cmi n sum of$ 25•25 10 :443w o fq -u= w•o a4 ags Subscribed and sworn to before me this 15t1i day of May 19 86 m v d 33 °w c ooi d a pk,o 3CmK5 C Notary Public for the State of Washington,-- ,?_, e r 6 1:15360 cac p- P m a2 Z residing at Federal Way, f y c.;-2 O King County, Washington. a_,5 {emu, n VN#87 Revised 10/84 7 CO CD W"6.5 (D a , cD2 , Nm 1123N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-026-86 APPLICATION NO(s).: CU-030-86 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for conditional use permit to allow construction of a mini storage building complex in a B-1 district. PROPONENT: GMS Architectural Group LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 3408 N.E. 4th Street. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than May 26, 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: May 7, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: May 12, 1986 A=// C:? Ronald G. Nelson Cr r. Spri Building and Zoning Director P. icy Develo•Vent Director 74--/-/ Ri hard C oughton Public Works Director FORM 1 NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-026-86 G'IS ARCHITFCTURAI GROUP PROPOSED ACTION APPI ICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PF 11 TO A! OW CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI STORAGF RUII DING CONPI FX IN A R-1 DISTRICT FII F CU-030-86 GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 3408 N.E. 4TI I STREE_I POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE I E.R.C. ) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES ODES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL CZ WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY MAY 26, 1986 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:0 0 P.M., f 1AY 26, 1986 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WIT1..1[']I IT oonemE A I rrL.Ir1QI7ATIrlI%I VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW ,,,T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 4vt.c.s DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 22, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 1, 1986 ECF - 026 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-030-86 PROPONENT: GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP PROJECT TITLE: RENTON HIGHLANDS SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALL01' THE — CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI-STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRI r HAVING APPROXIMATELY 64,986 SQUARE FEET ON ONE AND TWO FLOORS. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 3408 N.E. 4th STREET. 1- SITE AREA: 1.84 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 64,986 SQUAB FEE . IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MO IMPACT IMPACT INFORi 4TIO 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 1 j , 1 7 1 RECOMMENDATION: DNS fJ MITIGATED DNS n EI. REVIEWED BY: 440 G I TITLE: Pa1Ki DATE: ('Ik17, FORM. If14 REVISED 9/10/F ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIE.. „SET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: File( DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 22, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 1, 1986 ECF - 026 - 86 w6 APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-030-86 PROPONENT: GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP PROJECT TITLE: RENTON HIGHLANDS SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW TH, CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI-STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 64,986 SQUARE FEET ON ONE AND TWO FLOORS. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 3408 N.E. 4th STREET. SITE AREA: 1.84 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 64,986 SQUARE FEE IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATIG 1) - Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services i 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: 1DNS MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIE _D BY: , :i# ,,4-ii-_ T I T LE: ' /%,e:E hJAls/esvc DATE: A5Ne,r AZ/M FOR IF14 REVISED /10/85 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEEP REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: CI DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 22, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 1, 1986 ECF - 026 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-030-86 PROPONENT: GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP PROJECT TITLE: RENTON HIGHLANDS SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI-STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 64,986 SQUARE FEET ON ONE AND TWO FLOORS. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 3408 N.E. 4th STREET. SITE AREA: 1.84 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 64,986 SQUARE FEE IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATIO 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS 1 MITIGATED DNS n E REVIEWED BY: t .TITLE: DA1 E: e C FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/ 5 VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SIILLT REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: t]LD DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 22, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 1, 1986 ECF - 026 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-030-86 PROPONENT: GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP PROJECT TITLE: RENTON HIGHLANDS SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI-STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRIrT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 64,986 SQUARE FEET ON ONE AND TWO FLOORS. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 3408 N. E. 4th STREET. SITE AREA: 1.84 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 64,986 SQUARI FEE1 IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MC IMPACT IMPACT INFOR ‘TIOt 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: MITIGATED DNS EI REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DAZE: FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/£ VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW Sn«T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: z OW 114.4 DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 22, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 1, 1986 ECF - 026 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-030-86 PROPONENT: GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP PROJECT TITLE: RENTON HIGHLANDS SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI-STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN A B-1 ZONED DISTR] HAVING APPROXIMATELY 64,986 SQUARE FEET ON ONE AND TWO FLOORS. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 3408 N.E. 4th STREET. SITE AREA: 1.84 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 64,986 SQUAR FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATIOP 1) Earth jC 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health jH57):8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS MITIGATED DNS EI REVIEWED BY: 2 U/V-'1 C _TITLE: DATE: 25 - )b FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/£ VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S....T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'IN)(...( G Y 13164W S'2sO0441it DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 22, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 1, 1986 ECF - 026 — 86 Lot r Ut- HENTON APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-030-86 1P R 2, '1986 PROPONENT: GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP POLICY PROJECT TITLE: RENTON HIGHLANDS SELF—SERVICE STORAGE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI—STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 64,986 SQUARE FEET ON ONE AND TWO FLOORS. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 3408 N.E. 4th STREET. SITE AREA: 1.84 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 64,986 SQUAR FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MOB : IMPACT IMPACT INFORt.ATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4. 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources v 7) Environmental Health l 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services LZ 16) Utilities Gr COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS n MITIGATED DNS F-.'t EIS REVIEWED BY: <S&// /04SaYI TITLE: ' i^ DATE: FORM #14 REVISED 5/10/8 IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI r REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: rlo S 14 A) DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 22, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 1 , 1986 ECF - 026 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-030-86 PROPONENT: GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP PROJECT TITLE: RENTON HIGHLANDS SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI-STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 64,986 SQUARE FEET ON ONE AND TWO FLOORS. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 3408 N.E. 4th STREET. SITE AREA: 1.84 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 64,986 SQUARE FEU IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATIOP 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants L/ 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation r/ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: PC1 DNS MITIGATED DNS EI' REVIEWED BY: 4 TITLE: DATE: 15/ I —_ FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/ IIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S..__T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: IT RA im F.C. DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 22, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 1 , 1986 ECF - 026 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-030-86 PROPONENT: GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP PROJECT TITLE: RENTON HIGHLANDS SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLO't4 THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI-STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRI 1 HAVING APPROXIMATELY 64,986 SQUARE FEET ON ONE AND TWO FLOORS. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 3408 N.E. 4th STREET. SITE AREA: 1.84 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 64,986 SQUARE FEE IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATIO 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals l 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare li 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 13-1r 1 e Lv d 6.e ,.3d t`c) 4 11r QLl l L e_x l l ` "'1 V G1-c.K ( 72.4)° to4.a,74/' Yopr5ed d s ku.5± G /mar loy q is to C . 30 —0Y I 4e a u -1 c6/ 6 j i O re, RECOMMENDATION: DNS MITIGATED DNS a E ' 3 REVIEWED BY: 17 G' Z z TITLE: DATE: 7 o7 034 FOR #14 REVISED 9/10/ ;5 r VIRONMENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW Sn«T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: UI"i'1 1 t 1 L '. I DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 22, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 1 , 1986 ECF - 026 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-030-86 PROPONENT: GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP PROJECT TITLE: RENTON HIGHLANDS SELF-SERVICE STORAGE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI-STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN A B-1 ZONED DISTRICT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 64,986 SQUARE FEET ON ONE AND TWO FLOORS. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 3408 N.E. 4th STREET. SITE AREA: 1.84 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 64,986 SQUAR1 FEE- IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: nn`` N 0 e,oAsd-e"LS)dv- -cwP 2 RECOMMENDATION: DNS I MITIGATED DNS E REVIEWED BY: rg4 TITLE: hi DATE: FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/ 5 TRAN MI 113STTAL t ,' LETTER MA DOCUMENT G810 PROJECT: lit L 4" •1W ICI Stbl ARCHITECTS name, address)PROJECT NO: 81(o"453 DATE: ile11Lt1 AO;b(0 i.TO: G 1 .b WON If enclosures are not as noted, plea Mw,ltI,Vbk inform us immediately. a1:10 M 1662 ?V* • O4{•. If checked below, please: AT IN: 12413Vet4 )WA 166GS 1)0 3 f t \ Acknowledge receipt ofenclosur€ L Return enclosures to us. WE TRANSMIT: N) herewith under separate cover via in accordance with your request FOR YOUR: approval distribution to parties ( ) information 4 ) review & comment ( ) record N) use THE FOLLOWING: Drawings Shop Drawing Prints Samples Specifications Shop Drawing Reproducibles ( : Product Literature Change Order COPIES DATE REV. NO. DESCRIPTION ACTIC COE 3 41 u CVO mrr t0s 04\ tvlskiv4, 5 eta r 1 i ACT/ON A. Action: indicated on item transmitted D. For signature and forwarding a, noted below under REM CODE B No action required E. See REMARKS below C. For signature and return to this office REMARKS a4 S: frR 25 1986 k=- BUILDING/ZONING DEPJ COPIES TO: with enclosures) CA'N14w %t1 1WC" 0 sciLt AIA DOCUMENT G1110 • TRANSMITTAL LETTER • APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIA• • COPYRIGHT"© 1970 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1785 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE,N,W.,WASHINGTON,D.C.20036 ONE P -;E Ard tore•Design• Planning 10717 N.E.419 It.'1 Seievue,WA 98004 1208i 462.1277 Maafr at the Analogs Imam of Ambit 34 OF RA,i f © °Z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z rn 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235- )40 co 09- 1TcD SEPSE P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 24, 1986 Paul Thompson c/o Scott Taylor P. O. Box 58666 Seattle, Washington 98188 SUBJECT: CEDAR PARK APARTMENTS 416 MONROE AVENUE N.E., RENTON, WA Dear Mr. Thompson: It has come to the understanding of the Building and Zoning Department that the developer of the proposed mini storage facility to the east of the Cedar Park Apartments, Connwill, Inc., has proposed to have an emergency access route twenty-four (24) feet in width within the eastern parking lot of said apartments. Upon doing so, it is expected that two or three parking stalls will be eliminated by the granting of this easement. While this office realizes that the parking at the complex may not presently meet all code requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance, any lost parking stalls by this easement will need to be relocated. This likely can be accomplished by the restriping of the parking lot and incorporating compact parking stalls into the plan. If you desire any assistance regarding the requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely. Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JFL:ss 2363Z cc: Richard Gulstrom GMS Architectural Group 10717 N.E. 4th Street, Suite 1 Bellevue, Washington 98004 8 ors ITY OF RENTC T FILE NO(S): r >' 411R + BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT I. 6t tN9"r,<Z, MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATIOI NAME FEES GMS Architectural Group a REZONE*(FROM TO ADDRESS 10717 NE 4th Street Suite 1 IED SPECIAL PERMIT* TEMPORARY PERMIT* CITY ZIP Belleuve , Wa. 98004 Q CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* S 837' TELEPHONE SITE PLAN APPROVAL 462-9295 n SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: EICONTACTPERSON VARIANCE* From Section: NA 4E Justification Required Richard Gulstrom o ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: Same as above Q SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT Same as above Q WAIVER Justification Required) XXCAVNEFICXX DEVELOPER NO. OF LOTS: NAkE PLAT NAME: Connwill , Inc . ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 10709N Beardslee Blvd. Suite 2C1 Q PRELIMINARY CI Y Bothell , Wa. 98012 ZIP FINAL P.U.D. NAME: TELEPH NE 8 F-1455 n Residential Q Industri: ElCommercial n Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS 3408-NE 4th Street ED TENTATIVE EXISTING USE was storage and PRESENT ZONING O PRELIMINARY maintenance for PNB B1 FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Self-service Storage NUMBER OF SPACES: n ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE I 02 • SQ. FT. ACRES 2rAREA: 80 , 032 2 A res _pp OX TOTAL FEES 72 1oiZE-°" E P" : :C""T USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSINGDDATEDAPPLICATIONRECEIVEDBY: --____ TIAA,16iAPR101986APPLICTIONDETERMINEDTOBE. Accepted BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Ini ls) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: I4'b4 . U51I1,,I4,tjliOII) APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 4425 5(, I,t)A16K fliPtO4 f4 S ElAccepted Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Ini- ,ls) ROUTED TO: gyp(. Building Design Eng. Ea FireCa Parks al Police Policy Dev. 0 Traffic Eng. in Utilities r REVISED 1-31 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). The south 400 feet of the east 200 feet of the following described property: the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of the so!ztheast quarter of section 9 , township 23 north, range 5 east , W.M. , in King County, Wa. except the east one acre , and except the south 30 feet for road. AFFIDAVIT I, Richard Gulstrom being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner,Downer of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFO9E ME THIS DAY OF 1P(2-- f , 198C0. NOTARY PU6LIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING AT Name of Not- ry ublic)Signature of Owner) 101 11 Address) Address) u boq City) State) (Zip) ac, o Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 1VIISI1 0, v G \ Nv CITY OF i N;C" M i__, rrn) rP: fl W r- 107 17 Northeast 4th St.,Suite 1 r i Beiiev ,WA.98004 (206)462-1277 APR 1 6 1986 BUILDING/7.D!vIh1G DEFT April 14, 1986 RE: Justification for Conditional Use Permit for Highland Self-Service Storage at 3408 NE 4th Street, Renton, WA Justification for allowing a self-service storage facility in the Renton Highlands are as follows: A. Comprehensive Plan: We believe self-service storage is compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the comprehensive plan. Self-storage services are allowed in Bi zoning as long as it meets all conditions of the requirements set forth in the conditional use of the business district. We believe we are meeting or exceeding these requirements. B. Community Need: We believe with the high density of multi-family existing and proposed increase of new units in the near future, off-site storage is necessary. With the increased retail space, with the vocational technical school nearby and no other storage facility in the immediate area, this suggests additional need for self-service storage. C. Effect on Adjacent Properties: 1. Lot coverage: Lot coverage of the site is 54%, allowed is 65%. 2. Yards: Per landscape requirements, the front yard has ten feet 10' ) of landscaping abutting NE 4th Street. Side and rear yards, where adjacent to a residential lot, a 5' landscape strip has been established with the buildings acting as a sight obscuring wall which is higher than the necessary (6' ) per zoning ordinance. 3. Height: All parts of the existing and new structures will be below 38 feet, allowed per code is 40 feet. D. Compatibility: The existing structures in the area have been studied and Photos were taken for references as the design was developed for compatibility with the surrounding structures. Architecture•Design•Planning Member of the American Institute of Architects 2- E. Parking: Our past experience, this type and size of storage facility only requires 6-8 stalls; actually, we are supplying 33 stalls where 26 stalls (1 stall/ net 2000 sq. ft. ) is required by the zoning department. F. Traffic: The project is to be developed in 3 phases. The first phase will generate approximately 2-5 trips/day: second phase, 10-12 trips; third phase, 18-20 trips/day. G. Noise, Glare: Noise - None. Light or glare - Light standards will be placed at interior of site and the light will be controlled or directed at the buildings and the interior of site. H. Landscaping: The existing site was used by Pacific Northwest Bell as a maintenance and storage shed. Approximately 96% of the site is imperious with blacktop. After the project is completed, approximately 90% of the site will be imperious--the 10% will be landscaping 5 feet at the north property line 5 and 8 feet on the west property line and 10 feet on the south propert line. I. Accessory Uses: NA J. Conversion: The existing structures will comply to all requirements of the conditional use permit. K. Public Improvements: The project will not impose undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities and services. TRANSMITTAL 11,1 L, A/A DOCUMENT G810 a,` PROJECT: Highland Self-Service Storage ARCHITECT'S name, address)PROJECT NO: DATE: TO: r City of Renton If enclosures are not as noted, ple ,e Municipal Bldg. inform us immediately. 200 Mill Ave . South If checked below, please: ATTN: Acknowledge receipt of enclosu s. L Renton,WA 98055 Att: Jerry)Return enclosures to us. WE TRANSMIT: x) herewith under separate cover via in accordance with your request FOR YOUR: x) approval distribution to parties ( ) information review & comment ( ) record use THE FOLLOWING: Drawings Shop Drawing Prints Samples Specifications Shop Drawing Reproducibles ( ) Product Literature Change Order Justification for Conditional Use Permit COPIES DATE REV.NO. DESCRIPTION ACT' V CC 8 4/15/86 Justification for Conditional Use Permit ACTION A. Action indicated on item transmitted D. For signature and forwarding as noted below under REM, '(S CODE B. No action required E. See REMARKS below C. For signature and return to this office REMARKS Jerry: Photos will be sent next week. APR 1 G 1_ 8 COPIES TO: with enclosures) File Connwill Inc . By: Richard Gulstro AIA DOCUMENT G810 • TRANSMITTAL LETTER • APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIA• • COPYRIGHT 0 1970 ONE F ETHEAMERICANINSTITUTEOFARCHITECTS, 1785 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE,N.W.,WASHINGTON,D.C.20036 Architecture•De i •Planing 10717 N.B.4th EL 7 Bellevue.WA 90004 (lOS)462•.1277 Member of the Anerecaa WOE*d Arl>ll cie i ifilii : 111 iCi'f`F o(`*ENfId 111 l Egrog mvvAPR101986 G BUILDING/ZONING D Ps0 TA 10717 ortheast 4th St.,Suite 1 Bellevu •,WA.98004 (206)462.1277 I RE: Justification for Conditional Use Permit for Mini-storage at 3408 N.E. 4th St. Renton, WA. Justification for allowing a mini-storage facility in the Renton Highlands are as follows : a) A high density of multi-family units exist in the area which provide very little if any at all storage space, therefore, off site storage is necessary. b) Proposed increase of multi-family units in the area will also require more storage space. c) The Highland area is increasing in population, this increases the retail space, which requires storage space. d) Vocational Technical school generates records and needs storage space. e) No other storage facility exist in the area . f) Design will be compatible and will upgrade the existing facility. g) The project will have no adverse effects to any of the adjacent properties . h) A five foot landscape buffer will be provided at the north & west eleva- tions to soften the building elevations. i ) The south end of the property will provide a 10 foot landscape buffer with more than adequate landscaping to create an enhancing street frontage. Archit cture•Design•Planning Memb r of the American Institute of Architects CITY OPT 6r4TON 1TRANSMITTALp (I , Jspt, LETTER MA DOCUMENT G810 11,PP\ ? 01986 PROJECT: 124E1401W S7rsLT ' Stczuice BUILDING/ ARCHITECT'S name, address 0_,ne PROJECT NO: $40 " oa DATE: ,4p12..14 11 I`Ieb 1 TO: Cilyize-rr-c3-1If enclosures are not as noted, pie MU IC-1 PA L, $L.47G inform us immediately. Ztx Ni I L,t.— AVE, , S, If checked below, please: ATTN: vr"Acknowledge receipt ofenclost Return enclosures to us. WE TRANSMIT: V) herewith under separate cover via in accordance with your request FOR YOUR: Y) approval v) distribution to parties () information review & comment ( ) record use THE FOLLOWING: Drawings Shop Drawing Prints Samples Specifications Shop Drawing Reproducibles ( ) Product Literature Change Order Plea j , +( Q^r —As, LisTSID 1-ow' COPIES DATE REV NO DESCRIPTION AC' CC 1-1161-I 1.41-J.0 5EL.F }2,/ A91Z11. q e5ers oP 8OL MD P1211--T5 -1D17,46E1 A I,A4.) L•I II 1.15TI GICATIO1—'/..-ts11 E12 CK.44' 3C Col-4-iWlL- t sms--t r 8 11 1 -- i l.Ic"Tlo1..1 e I VIIUDt-1Ms1-'54 C}1 , . ACTION A. Action indicated on item transmitted D. For signature and forwarding as noted below under REM; S CODE B. No action required E. See REMARKS below C. For signature and return to this office REMARKS dlt*2 U, DF `JITL FAA1-a L I,-1:7eCA P1I,-G PLA f--1 COPIES TO: with enclosures) Ce'P--i 1•--4 L.-L, BY: AIA DOCUMENT G810 • TRANSMITTAL LETTER • APRIL 970 EDITION • MA* • COPYRIGHT ® 1970 ONE P/ 7,ETHEAMERICANINSTITUTEOFARCHITECTS, 1785 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE, N.W.,WASHINGTON, D.C.20036 Atchltecturr•Design• Planning 10717 N.E.4t 8. '1 Behove.WA 90004 (106)482•t277 Member of the Americas) lac ile d A1Wu+ ECF: l 0 z City of Renton Lu: o CD- 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST SEPZ . 1# Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Renton Highlands Self-Service Storage 2. Name of applicant: Connwill , Inc . 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 10709 Beardslee Blvd. Suite 201 Bothell , WA 98012 4.Date checklist prepared: March 21 , 198' 5.Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6.Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Spring 86 start construction Spring 88 finish construction CITY C; D [P. 3 irP.9CJ 3, v.- APR 101986 BUILDING/ZONING DEFT ti 7. Do you have any pld„n for future additions, expansions, or rurther activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. Only three phases: as each phase is completed and rented the next phase will start construction. B. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. N/A 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. N/A 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building permit , electrical permit , utilities permit , etc . 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The existing lot is 80 , 000 sq. ft . - completely impervious surface) with existing office space and shed from past tenant Pacific Northwest Bell facility. ) The new owner proposes self-s rvice storage in three phases with a managers quarters , using he existing office building shed for storage with two ne storage facilities two stories in height . 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The south 400 feet of the East 200 feet of the 1/4 SW 1/4 SW 1/4 SW 1/4 of section 9 TWP 23N, R , 5E ; W.M. except the soith 30 feet for each. The property is on the north side of the NE 4th Street between Monroe Ave NE and Olympia Ave NE just east of the multi- family project Mastro 244 units . B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); all rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Less than 1% . c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Gravel and sand. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. N/A 2 - 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdraw or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. No . 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No . 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No . b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No . 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The present storm water collection system collects 100% of the present runoff , therefore , the planned additio to the site shall not alter this drainage collection systen as approved by the City building department . 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No . 4 - e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Two new buildings total of 17 ,800 sq . ft . of surface asphalt to be removed with a cut of 12" +- for footings and concrete slab . Approx. 700 cubic yards of cut . f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No . g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? There is no contemplated increase in impervious surface a ea. The site , in its present condition, is now 9 % impervious surface. After the development is finished -90% . h. P oposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the ontempQyated improvements to the existing site shall not impact erosion during new construction. Measures will be taken to ensure on-site surface drainage water will not enter the existing drainage collection system without first entering filter fabric or straw bales before 2. AIR reaching on-site catch basins. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Typical odors from trucks and equipment during normal construction hours . After construction odors will be minimal . b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Dust control measures will be utilized during construction. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. N/A 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N/A 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A 3 - d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, i; any: 10 ft . landscaping strip provided at the street property line and at the north and west property line a 5 ft . landscaping strip . 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Minimum use- new facilities will be unheated except for manager' s office and quarters which will require electric , water and possibly gas services . b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N/A c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The manager' s quarters and office will meet or exceed Washington State Energy Codes . 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. N/A 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Minor traffic noises exist on 4th Street . 6 - d. Proposed me, .es to reduce or control surface, md, and runoff water impacts, if any: See c-1 answer above . 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o I evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other a Shrubs o grass o I crop or grain o I Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 2- Birch trees 1- Chestnut s-veral junipers c. L'st threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. N A d. Plo osed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preservePP9 o enhance vegetation on the site, if any: P opose to replace with similar vegetation and p ssibly save what is existing. 5.Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other none Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other none Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other none b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. N/A c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. N/A 5 - 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Because of the existing multi family zonong to the north an west the building elevations will reflect a scale and desig. similar to multi-family buildings .9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. One unit for manager, middle income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None . c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 40 feet maximum height . Concrete and wood siding. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Any ground units on the multi-family units to the north will lose their territorial views to the south to the cemetery. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Treatment of exterior materials. The scale of the new buildings will be similar to the multi-family units to the west and north. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Site lighting to be turned on at night only. The light will be directed towards the center of the project . b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Exterior lighting will be contained to the site . c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Lighting will be directed towards the interior of the project . 8 - 2) What types aria levals of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short- term - normal construction noises. Long- term - very low levels of noise will result from the storage units. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None required . 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Existing site and structures are not being used. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No . c. Describe any structures on the site. Existing CMU Block building. 1 story approximately 2 ' x 190 ' or 5 , 000 sq . ft . with a shed approximately 95 ' x 175 ' or 16 , 000 sq. ft . d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? None . e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? B-1 i f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. N A i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? one or two . j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None . k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 7 - e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. N/A f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Minimum impact : Phase A 2-5 trips/day, Phase B 10 12 trips . Phase C 18-20 trips/day. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: N/A 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Development of the proposal may increase the demand for public services- should be minimum with self-storage . b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: AQINZEIri natural gas, refuse service,(elephon'Osanitary sewe.), septic sys em, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electrical , water, telephone , sanitary sewer and storm sewer. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should ther -any, willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Richard Gulstom GMS Architectural Group 10 - 176 1 -8-84 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? N/A b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. N/A b.b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: T'/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. NE 4th street is a primary arterial. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? No . NA c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Approximately : 26 stalls , none will be removed . * Note: The complete site is asphalt paving used for storage of Pacific Northwest Bell vehicles . d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe indicate whether public or private). Possible new curb cut . 9 - e •O. SUPPLEMENTAL SHtt I FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1.How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 11 - 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent Name Prirpted: 12 - CITY Or InNTTON 1] ( [14 1,1 [E APR 101986 EASEMENTT BUILDING/ZONING DEFT. THIS ENDENTURE made this day of 19 byands between hereinafter called Grantors, and called Gr me WITNESSETH: That the said Grantors, owners in fee simple of th following described property: The Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the East one acre thereof; and EXCEPT the South 430 . 00 feet of the East 200. 00 feet of that portion thereof lying West of said East one acre; and EXCEPT the North 125. 00 feet of the South 280 .00 feet of the West 155.00 feet thereof; and EXCEPT the West 30. 00 feet thereof; and EXCEPT the South 30 .00 feet thereof for road; and EXCEPT That portion thereof as deeded to the City of Renton under recording number 8106010654 . In consideration of mutual benefits to be derived by the exercise of the rights herein granted do by these presents grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto said Grantee for a period of 40 years right of easement for emergency access purposes only over, across and upon a strip of land 24 . 00 feet in width and having 12 .00 feet of such width on each side of the line described as follows : COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of said Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter thence S 89`06 ' 02" E along the South line of said subdivision 395. 82 feet to the West line of the East 200. 00 feet of said subdivision lying West of the East one acre; thence N 0'13 ' 17" W along said line 359 .00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of said line; thence N 89° 46 ' 43" W 31. 00 feet more or less t< the terminus of said line and easement on the Easterly boundary of an existing emergency access easement . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Grantors have executed this instrument the day and year first above written. DATE GRANTOR r' TRANSMITTAL i LETTER 101.AIA DOCUMENT G810 PROJECT:PAN' r1 k f4.‘ ARCHITECT'S Q name, address) 1 aa.. PROJECT NO: %•/ 03 SSitIli t J a+• DATE: 31 I4( Vido TO: re 1 RIC t"lb IQ mVNICI ACk444e-b If enclosures are not as noted, p se inform us immediately. I.iN lw6• $0 If checked below, please: ATTN: L `gylat J Acknowledge receipt of"enclos s. Return enclosures to us. WE TRA[_SMIT: herewith under separate cover via in accordance with your request FOR YOUR: approval distribution to parties ( ) information I) review & comment ( ) record y ) use THE FOLLOWING: Drawings Shop Drawing Prints Samples Specifications Shop Drawing Reproducibles ( ) Product Literature Change Order COPIES DATE REV. NO. DESCRIPTION 1 AC': CO 31 1 ' lebc tik4"^ 01 4 Snk eoO. P41%-, co N SCR Pam• ACTION A. Action indicated on item transmitted D. For signature and forwarding as noted beiow_under REMA v CODE B. No action required E. See REMARKS below C. For signature and return to this office REMARKS pctua.r,#. olkikzA.e rtvAit, i AcbSo 1.1 CiT_Y lit F.LNT'.'.I _ L COPIES TO: with enclosures) MAR 1 7 1986 ~ Va o n., i'i ! it r loll^I:,DEPT. B • MA DOCUMENT G810 • TRANSMITTAL LETTER • APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIA• • COPYRIGHT © 1970 ONE PACTHEAMERICANINSTITUTEOFARCHITECTS, 1785 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE, N.W.,WASHINGTON, D.C.20036 Architecture•Demon • pluming 10717 N.E.oh ht. 4•1 Bellevue.WA 98004 (208)462•1277 Member et Use Alter tIs blle 6f Ndpecsi G,Cou4 CITY OF r,LNTD:I a I Cry I-tq 1'7 rTh 10717 Northeast 4th St.,Suite 1 MAR 1 aBellevue,WA.98004 (206)462.1277 19 86 rU•'!aNG ZO March 10 , 1986 City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Jerry Lind Re: Plans submitted to you for mini-storage on 4th St. dated February 25, 1986 Dear Jerry: The intent of this letter is to reiterate what was discussed by phone from you and during the meeting with Bob Bergstrom and Jim Gray. Wednesday, March 5, 1986 a meeting with Bob Bergstrom of the Utility Department and Jim Gray of the Fire Department and the following items were covered: 1. Mr. Bergstrom did not agree to a roof over the water line at the easement on the west property line. Mr. Bergstrom did agree to help GMS if a variance would be required to separate the building at the easement. 2. Mr. Bergstrom did have an alternative: if the roof system at the easement could be removed in case of repairs on the water line, GMS is presently reviewing this situation. 3. Mr. Gray stated the alternative solution was satisfactory if the roof minimum clearance was 13 '-6" for access for their Architecture•Design•Planning Member of the American Institute of Architects 2- emergency vehicles. Mr. Gray also stated the walls will be 4 hour (CMU Block) with the area under the roof to be sprinkled, and the soffit under the roof to be 1 hour construction. GMS believes these items will be met. Friday, March 7 , 1986 Jerry Lind called our office and stated the zoning department had reviewed the plans (see enclosed copies) and approved the concept as shown on the plans - which meet the intent of the zoning section B (3)N Conditional Uses : Self service storage facilities contained entirely within one building. Jerry, if you have any further information or questions, please feel free to call me. cerely 4:4s Ri hard Gulstrom, A GMS Architectural G up RG:vst cc: File, Connwill , Inc. , Jim Gray and Bob Bergstrom enc. ENDING OF FILE FILE TITLE I d r274-6 2 0:39 Pk)