Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA87-029BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE 02.? f 1 CA 0 CITY OF RENTON LL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division March 7 , 1990 Scott G. Miller 10306 N.E. 10th Street, Suite 109 Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE: Food Service Brokerage, Lake Washington Boulevard (SA-029-87) Dear Mr. Miller: We have received your letter informing us that Kiewit Construction Company is interested in now developing the Food Service Brokerage (above-referenced) approved in September, 1987 . You requested waiver of environmental review for this project, based upon the fact that only minor modifications are being proposed for the previously approved development and also, because, the initially approved application expired recently. Staff has researched the files and determined that the building permit for Food Service Brokerage expired in December, 1989 . The zoning permit expired in September, 1989 ; the Environmental Checklist was, as is customary, valid only for a period of one year. Research into SEPA Rules and the City's Environmental Review Ordinance indicates that these guidelines require new environmental review and new administrative site plan review for the project. Application forms have been sent to Cindy Larson. Once we receive the revised application materials, we will immediately begin the review process, and provide periodic progress reports. If you have questions or need additional information, please contact me or Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner, at 235-2550 . Thank you. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson Chief - Current Planning DKE/lb 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 scoff c c tewooc miller - registered architect 10306 n.e. 10th street, suite 109, bellevue, washington 98004, (206) 455-5549 March 2, 1990 C. 1 Ci RENTON lI , MAR 2 1990 1)1 i ` 1 pp ,irk UDon-. Ericktorv.. '. .hi City of Renton Building Dept . 200 Mill Ave . Renton , WA 98052 RE : . Waiver of Environmental . Review Process : Dear Mr . Erickson On behalf of Kiewit Construction and - the Cole Company , I am requesting a waiver of the environmental review process for the project located on Lake Washington Blvd . N . E . , ( SA02987 , permit no . B13566 ) . After discussing with the building department - our .intended minor modifications to the original site plan , they suggested that we apply for the waiver because the original site plan approval just expired in December , 1989 . Find enclosed a new site plan showing a similar but smaller building located in the same area as before . The Cole Company intends to resubmit new architectural , civil engineering and landscape plans for a new permit as soon as the site plan approval has been granted . Thank you for your consideration of this matter . If you have any .questions , _ please _contact me . Very ruly y urs , Scott G . Miller Architect 1 v MAR 5 1990 66: 4N .. .0, 44:aCt. 4 1 ic 4):: 53,, 1k,<, ute• 50 F 51- iv 54. / 111111111111:,- .• it5 1S 66 7 .. o bo h a il 7 ,,Z./ 4", • r r. ‘'NV46 2 ./... /h 11 e45 c-( tm-Vse ti 0.,07 tr, co • 41' 4. voilibinlor L „/ ) 1' . 9%3 NP4/ 461 // \ driplfr Ln;.. .. r.!ilir4111P<Ajig:' 1 Adfre,#411411 8 t Istitif A' 4 00.11.1‘ 41bIs Vfrifooiloola‘ -‘ IF/1 5-!.:,-5 D 5 V. 4II IinV_ 414...,., .- A1-- ., et, ss• I i ,,,....., , 1 ,i',.0,. ,•> I L_ ,,.. ri P G / , .,'...--—'•-..„ 0 i.- • 413.51. 1 V Te. •11. Ao 0 0,0 ws,.' 4fr 5 1TE FL Ail 1,,-2o' A TUAL IN 1 A•,,,), MAR 5 1990 I' d' ibilitio. id, 57- h. e i bt• IN --- 'N sb i s 4' 4T0 4. Gr So S a.7O' Wi 5;' ''' ,)P 4,, 0, LA„,c.3 ac e 7 ,!billi> . v.e.,,,, 4, r 1 110 t,. .` nr rb iii I 10 ZZ 27, 267 26 17 2 70 DI 72 A11t111111rli 11-116114 Qe:?° Yr/ f PEA* \‘/ r•Or‘ 4 111111111111/4 II=1 \---ifkii/-.4 5, iik111111041/4,-"Nihiv.„.., lkt. 1 t tm+Atr T L IN P 5 A. P C /• '__ M epee en __ I 415.51. R L n v1 5 ITE PL Ari r=2O, ACTUAL M1i UR7HI l scoff C atewooc miller _ registered architect 10306 n.e. 10th street, suite 109, Bellevue, washington 98004, (206) 455-5549 March 2, 1990 i MAR 2 1990 [) Y'- II Don Erickson I q City of Renton Building Dept . 200 Mill Ave . Renton , WA 98052 RE : Waiver of Environmental Review Process Dear Mr . Erickson : On behalf of Kiewit Construction and ' the Cole Company , I am requesting a waiver of the environmental review process for the project located on Lake Washington Blvd . N . E . , ( SA02987 , permit no . B13566 ) . After discussing with the building department . our .intended minor modifications to the original site plan , they suggested that we apply for the waiver because the original site plan approval just expired in December , 1989 . Find enclosed a new site plan showing a similar but smaller building located in the same area as before . The Cole Company intends to resubmit new architectural , civil engineering and landscape plans for a new permit as soon as the site plan approval has been granted . Thank you for your consideration of this matter . If you have any questions , please contact me . Very ruly y urs , Scott G . Mi l l er Architect TY OF furEEC ER VONE SEP171987 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS BUILDING/ZONINQDE!r WHEREAS , GERALD E. GRIEVE and VERNA GRIEVE are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington , described as Exhibit ' A' attached hereto . WHEREAS , the owner( s ) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use , present and future , of the above described real property . NOW , THEREFORE , the aforesaid owner( s ) hereby establish , grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned , their successors , heirs , and assigns as follows : INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS The owner( s ) of the above described property , their suc- cessors , heirs and assigns , hereby agree and covenant to participate in , sign a petition in support of , and accept a future Local Improvement District ( LID) for the following purposes of providing thennecessary off-site improvements required by the Renton Subdivision Ordinance : the installa- tion of curbs , gutters , sidewalks , street paving , sanitary sewers , storm sewers , undergrounding of utilities , and street lighting . These covenants are imposed in lieu of Section 9- 1105 (6 ) of Title IX of Ordinance #1628 of the City of Renton . DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025 . If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants , the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improve- ments as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation . Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who re adversely affected by said breach . GERALD E. GRIEVE hic,;4.4., VERNA GRIEVE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING On this day of September 19 87 , before me personally appeared GERALD E. GRIEVE an VERNA GRIEVE the person (s ) who executed the within and foregoing instrument , and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person ( s ) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written . 0114 1KJ thlbr_k> Notary u l i c in and for tt e of Washington , residing, pt My commission expires 1 ' Exhibit A Lot 2 of Lot 181, C.D. Hillman' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden No. 3 according to Volume 11, page 81 of plats, City of Renton. BE I I II v OF FILE FILE TITLE MICROFILMED atiL M096 .0 3Ac9S7 : Or R4,4, CD° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0 MIMI 09 co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09gTFO SEP c .';') BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 1987 TO: CITY CLERK FROM: BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ) SUBJECT: GERALD GRIEVE SITE APPROVAL: SA-029-87 TRANSMITTED HEREWITHIN IS FILE SA-029-87. READY TO BE FILED. OF R4,• A L I. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT z usil G RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR OMB coe MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ® 235-2540 4 0, 9'I'n6.0 SEPI Y.. e) BARBA>RA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: August 28, 1987 TO: All Parties of Record and City Officials FROM: Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE 'REPORT AND DECISION FOR SA-29-87, GERALD GRIEVE AND SA-045-87, G.W. CONSTRUCTION Please note: Because of omissions and word processing printer errors in t final reports, the above referenced documents have be revised 1:14he amended versions are attached::\ DKE:plp:p4-023 s itePlan/Dskl ECF02 687 SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICATION NO. : ECF-026-87, SA-029-87 APPLICANT: Gerald Grieve LOCATION: Property located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. at the 4900 block. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval to allow the construction of a two-story office building having approximately 13 , 157 square feet on a 1. 26 acre site. COMMITTEE REVIEW: The review was conducted at 10: 00 a.m. on May 20, 1987, in the third floor conference room of the Renton Municipal Building. The Committee review was conducted after receiving written comment from all divisions of the Public Works Department, both divisions of the Building and Zoning Department, and the Fire, Police, Parks and Policy Development Departments. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1 Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2 Site plan (received March 30, 1987) . Exhibit No. 3 Landscape plan (received March 30, 1987) . Exhibit No. 4 Building elevation plans. Exhibit No. 5 Site grading and storm drainage plan. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the Site Plan Review Committee, the Site Plan Review Committee now makes and enters the following: Findings: The applicant, Gerald Grieve, has requested site plan approval to allow the construction of a two-story office building having approximately 13 , 157 square feet on a 1. 26 acre site. 2 . The applicant' s file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43 . 21C 1971 as amended) , a Determination of Non- SITE PLAN REVIEW COMP I'EE CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION GERALD GRIEVE PAGE 2 3 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43 . 21C 1971 as amended) , a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated was issued for the subject proposal on June 3 , 1987, with the following conditions: a. That the owner or future assignee agrees to participate in a local assessment district to cover their fair share of the interchange improvement costs on Exit 7 . NOTE: These costs will be levied on a regional basis. b. That the applicant bond for their estimated fair share of these improvements at a rate of $91. 44 per vehicle trip prior to the issuance of the occupancy permit for the first building. c. That the applicant provide covenants to the City to ensure: That the property owner will participate in any future LID in the area. 4 . Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal . b>. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property as low density-multiple family. This type of development is not mandated where other Comprehensive Plan policies or other circumstances may affect the type of development on the subject property. 6. The subject site was annexed into the City in April of 1960 by the adoption of Ordinance 1823 . The site was automatically zoned G-9600 upon annexation. A rezone request R-217-78 to reclassify the site to R-3 was dismissed by the City. The site was rezoned to R-2 in July, 1980, by the adoption of Ordinance 3446. The site was later reclassified B-1, Business Use, with the adoption of Ordinance No. 3952 adopted in October 1985. As part of the rezone action to B-1, Business Use, the City Council approved covenants limiting the height of buildings on the property to a maximum of 35 feet and restricted development on the site to office uses only. Development would be subject to site plan review. 7 . The subject site is surrounded by residential uses to the north and east; commercial and multiple-family development to the south; and I-405 to the west. Ez . The applicant's site plan complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. Conclusions: 7_. The subject proposal generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. Specific issues raised by various City departments and focused on: a. Compliance with the parking and loading requirements/driveway widths. b. Landscaping. c. Rockery standards. d. Off-site improvements. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMP PEE CITY OF RENTON REFORT AND DECISION GERALD GRIEVE PAGE 3 e. Traffic mitigation. 3 . The site plan as proposed needs to be revised to comply with the requirements of the parking and loading ordinance. The following lists the changes which will bring the proposal into compliance: a. Revising the driveway shown on the site plan to reflect the code requirement of a maximum width for commercial driveways is 30 feet (52 feet is shown on plans) . A variance may be sought with the Board of Public Works. b. Revising handicap parking stall widths to reflect a requirement of 12 1/2 feet for width. c. Revising the number of parking stalls to 49 instead of the 48 . d. Revising the number of compact parking stalls to 15 instead of the 16 shown on the plans. t . Section 4-716 requires a ten foot landscaped setback from the street property line. This requirement is met or exceeded for most of the frontage area along Lake Washington Boulevard. Only by parking stall No. 42 do the plans show less than 10 feet of landscaping to the street property line. This must be revised. The site plan shows the use of rockeries along Lake Washington Blvd. in front of the building and around the northern most parking stalls. Rockeries over 4 feet in height are not allowed in the City of Renton unless a geotechnical study is prepared and signed by an engineer verifying that the rockery will hold. The applicant will need to have such a study prepared and submitted to the Building and Zoning Department. 6. The Public Works Department has identified a number of improvements along the frontage of the property. These improvements have been deferred for one year which ends November 13 , 1987. In addition the original property owner filed a covenant on the property agreeing to participate in any future LID. The subject proposal will generate additional trips to a corridor which is becoming congested and needing roadway improvements. The Public Works Department has established a Benefit Area and per trip fee.The Environmental Review Committee has required conditions of the applicant to participate in any future LID and to pay their fair share of local area improvements. E . The Traffic Engineer, in looking at the island in the driveway, has suggested that the island be better designed in order to more clearly define the access and control circulation through the parking lot. The applicant should work with the Building and Zoning Department and the Traffic Engineer on additional landscaping and redesign of the island. c . The garbage bin is located on the south side of the parking lot near the loading area. Garbage trucks will be required to drive through the full length of the parking lot to reach the garbage bin. In order to eliminate potential problems between vehicles and the garbage trucks, the applicant shall work with the Building and Zoning Department staff on relocating the bin closer to the driveway. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMA PEE CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION GERALD GRIEVE PACE 4 10. The proposal is consistent with the requirements of the B-1, Business Use Zone and covenants on the property with respect to height, use, and site plan review. The proposed architecture and quality of design is compatible with the adjacent residential uses and a good addition to the City of Renton. Decision: The site plan for Gerald Grieve, file SA-029-87, is subject to the following conditions: L. That the applicant shall comply with the conditions of the Environmental Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated. The the applicant should provide a ten foot landscaped setback from parking stall No. 42 to the street property line. 3 . That the applicant shall provide a geotechnical study approved by an engineer supporting the use of rockeries as shown on the site plan. 1 . That the applicant shall work with the City's Landscape Architect and the Traffic Engineer to redesign and provide additional landscaping for the island located in the driveway. 5. That the applicant work with the City' s Landscape Architect on suitable locations for relocating the garbage bin. For the purpose of these decisions, the term "should" and "shall" are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" is considered discretionary. a ORDERED THIS 24th daf--gtx t, 19 , n ehalf of the Site Plan Review Committee. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator r2RANSMITTED THIS 24th day of August, 1987, to the parties of record: Scott Miller, Contact Person 9950 Lk. Washington Blvd. N. Bellevue, WA 98004 Gerald Grieve Food Service Brokerage Company P.O. Box 1127 Renton, WA 98057 YRANSMITTED THIS 24th day of August, 1987 , to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Dir. Members Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building and Zoning Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle I ' SITE PLAN REVIEW COM PEE CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION GERALD GRIEVE PAGE 5 REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before September 7, 1987 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available prior to the meeting date of , 1987, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen 14) days of the decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011 (B) (1) , which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on September 7 , 1987 . THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. ill communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request or appeal by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. 0 0 CITY OF RENTON LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENTV Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director June 29, 1987 Gerald Grieve Food Service Brokerage Company P.O. Box 1127 Renton, WA 98057 RE: Gerald Grieve (Food Service Brokerage Co. ) Building Site Approval Application 029-87 and ECF-026-87 Dear Mr. Grieve: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of your site approval request for property located at 4904 Lk. Washington Blvd. N.E. The Committee on May 20, 1987, decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: 1 . That the owner or future assignee agrees to participate in a local assessment district to cover their fair share of the interchange improvement costs on Exit 7. NOTE: These costs will be levied on a regional basis. 2 . That the applicant bond for their estimated fair share of these improvements at a rate of $91. 44 per vehicle trip prior to the issuance of the occupancy permit for the first building. 3 . That the applicant provide covenants to the City to ensure: That the property owner will participate in any future LID in the area. The Committee ' s determination is final and may be appealed to the City' s Hearing Examiner no later than 5 : 00 p.m. on July 6, 1987 .Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Gerald Grieve Gerald Grieve Building June 29 , 1987 Page 2 If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2540 and ask for myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague. For the Environ n al Review Committee. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DE: DB:cb: Dsk1 LtFoodSr o CITY OF RENTON LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director June 29, 1987 Scott Miller 9950 Lk. Washington Blvd. N. Bellevue, WA 98004 RE: Gerald Grieve (Food Service Brokerage Co. ) Building Site Approval Application 029-87 and ECF-026-87 Dear Mr. Miller: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Reviecri Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of your site approval request for property located at 4904 Lk. Washington Blvd. N.E. The Committee on May 20, 1987, decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the owner or future assignee agrees to participate in a local assessment district to cover their fair share of the interchange improvement costs on Exit 7 . NOTE: These costs will be levied on a regional basis. 2 . That the applicant bond for their estimated fair share of these improvements at a rate of $91. 44 per vehicle trip prior to the issuance of the occupancy permit for the first building. 3 . That the applicant provide covenants to the City to ensure: That the property owner will participate in any future LID in the area. The Committee ' s determination is final and may be appealed to the City' s Hearing Examiner no later than 5: 00 p.m. on July 6, 1987 .Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Scott Miller Gerald Grieve Building June 29, 1987 Page 2 If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2540 and ask for myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague. For the Environmental Review Committee. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DE:DB:cb:Dskl LtMiller AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON 1.u d rey De Jo i s being first duly sworn on oath states ERC)hasaissueda Environmental Review Committee ON t e ofthathe/she is the Chief Clerk of the NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the following projects: GERALD GRIEVE VALLEY DAILY NEWS Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two story office build- Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition ing having approximately 13,157 sq. ft. of space on a 1.26 acre site. Property located Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six N.E. -t the 4900 block. File Nos: OCF-126are87,SA029-87. months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published BOEING COMMERICIAL AIRPLANE COMPANYintheEnglishlanguagecontinuallyasdailynewspapersinKent, King Application for conditional use permit toCounty,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal construct a two-story office building consist- newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ing of movable modules on approximately 68,000 sq. ft. site. Property located at 800KingCounty. Logan Avenue N. File Nos: ECF-023- 87,CU-028-87. Further information regarding this actionThenoticeintheexactformattached,was published in the Kent Edition is available in the Building and Zoning Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition and not in Department,Municipal Building,Renton, supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Washington be23 filed with0. Any appeal n ERC pp g y action must be filed the Renton Hear- during the below stated period.The annexed notice a ing Examiner by July 17, 1987. Published in the Valley Daily News July Notioe of Environmental Determination 3, 1987.R2385 was published on July 3, 1967 H2385 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ a 3_06 . Subscribed and sworn to before me this hday of July 19 87 Nota ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11 86 NED/Dskl P'JB7387 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a DECLARATION of NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the following projects: GERALD GRIEVE Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two story office building having approximately 13 , 157 sq. ft. of space on a 1. 26 acre site. Property located on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. at the 4900 block. File Nos: OCF-126-87, SA-029-87 . BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY Application for conditional use permit to construct a two- story office building consisting of movable modules on approximately 68, 000 sq. ft. site. Property located at 800 Logan Avenue N. File Nos: ECF-023-87 , CU-028-87 . Farther information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 235-2540. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with tale Renton Hearing Examiner by July 17, 1987 . PUBLISHED: July 3 , 1987 Pr- FT.t.`•^,-'rN_'a.Se r:'.:•a1 7-[:..`i''. .:S F;,ar. v1`41 i';aL",- IyOC'C N OT E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-126-87 & SA-029-87 APPLICANT GERALD GRIEVE PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2 STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 13, 157 SC FT, OF SPACE ON 1 . 26 ACRE SITE. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. N . E . AT THE 41900 BLOCK . POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. 7HE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES in DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL j><WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY N APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY I3E FILED WITH CITHE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER I3Y 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. Environmental Review Committee May 20, 1987 Page 7 With regard to the area under review, Springer suggested the possibilityoftransferringthecommercialdesignationtotheSabeysite, inasmuch as the area intended for commercial use has been developed in office parkandmanufacturingpark. Gerald Grieve (Foodservice Brokerage Company Building), ECF-026-87,SA-029-87, application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two-story office building having approximately 13,157 square feet ona1.26 acre site; property located on the east side of Lake WashingtonBoulevardN.E. at the 4900 block: Samek-McKague noted that the propertyhadbeenrezonedtoB-1, business, due to its proximity to I-405. The Comprehensive Plan designates low density multi-family. Samek-McKague noted three major issues - whether sufficient informationhasbeenprovidedwithrespecttocontrollingsurfacewaterrunoffandpotentialerosion; whether sufficient measures have been taken tomitigatetrafficimpacts; and whether sufficient measures have been takentoprovideon-site recreation amenities for employees. She noted thepresenceofrestrictivecovenantsonthesiterequiringlimitingdevelopmenttoofficeuses, requiring site plan review, and limiting theheightoffuturestructuresto35feet. Also, the property was short platted last year and the Board of Public Works granted a deferral of theoff-site improvements. She advised that the site is located in thebenefitareaforN.E. 44th - Lake Washington Blvd. , and the applicantwillbeassessed $103.63 per trip. With regard to the control of stormwater runoff, it appears that the applicant has provided sufficientmeasurestocontroltheerosion. Relative to the fairly steep north sideofthesite, the applicant has proposed to stay out of up to 35% of thesteepslopesonthenorthsideandsouthwesttipofthesite. There will be landscaping and gradingoperationswillbeexcluded. Provisions for employees have been proposedfortheemployeesontheeastside. Discussion and questions followed. Erickson asked if there were anyportionofthesitethatpeoplecouldwalkdowntoandsuggestedthepossibilityofaplatform. Samek-McKague advised that staff is recommending that the EnvironmentaReviewCommitteeissueaDeterminationofNon-significance - mitigatedwithconditionsthattheapplicantparticipateintheAreaBenefit District and pay an assessment fee and that there be covenants to keepdevelopmentoutofthesteepslopeareaofthesite. Discussion followed. Norris stated that they are working to have apackageputtogethertomaketheAreaBenefitDistrictmoreformalandconfirmedthattheassessmentwouldbeat $103.63 per trip generated. He recommended that be paid by the applicant at the time an occupancy permitisissued. Nelson noted that they have been talking about an L. I.D. for allimprovementsallalongLakeWashingtonBoulevardandN.E. 44th. Springer asked if that had an obligation to do Lake Washington Blvd with curbs,gutters, and sidewalks. Samek-McKague indicated that they did throughanotheragreement. Nelson indicated concern about plans on the public right-of-way, thattheywouldprefertoseethemonthepropertytoallowforprivatemaintenance. Discussion followed regarding appropriate trees to beplanted. Erickson noted that the plan calls for trees on the inside ofthesidewalk, which should not create a problem. Norris noted concern regarding the in and out driveway and suggested moreinternallandscapingforbetterdefinition. Springer asked if they could work with the applicant to get thatredefined, that there be an in and out island to better define the accessandtocontrolthecirculationthroughtheparkinglot. Ericksonsuggestedthatthegarbabebinberelocatedtoprecludeunnecessarytrafficthroughtheparkinglotbygarbagetrucks. Environmental Review committee May 20, 1987 age 8 ACTION: MOVED BY SPRINGER, SECONDED BY NELSON, TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER WILL TALK WITH THE APPLICANT ABOUT REDESIGNING THE ENTRY ISLAND AND TALK TO THE APPLICANT ABOUT AN ALTERNATIVE LOCATION FOR THE GARBAGE BIN. MOTION CARRIED. Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, ECF-023-87, CU-028-87; application for conditional use permit to construct a two-story office building consisting of movable modules on approximately 68,000 square foot site; property located at 800 Logan Ave. N. : Erickson advised that they hadaskedforanoppportunitytotakeanewlookattheelevations. He pointed out the location of the site on the Renton Airport. He said the applicant had responded in terms of landscaping and the needs for amenities by pointing out the Cedar River Trail amenities. Staff posedthequestion, where are these improvements in relation to this site, and indicated that the location was not acceptable to this building. Theyweretoldthattheyneededamenitiesonsite. Three issues were noted: amenities, the need to break the scale of the building, and parking. Erickson suggested a running tab on all parkingforthisfacility. Boeing responded that it was a temporary building and that parking was therefore temporary. Discussion followed regarding the definition of temporary. There was general disapproval expressed regarding these kinds of building and thatitwasfeltthatthebuildingneededtobetreatedasapermanent structure. ACTION: MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY SPRINGER, THAT MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED REGARDING AETHETICS, A DEFINITION OF TEMPORARY, THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING, LANDSCAPING, PARKING ISSUES, THAT THERE NEEDS TO BE A RUNNING TAB OF THE PARKING. ALSO THE SPRINKLER PLANS HAVE TO BE TAKEN CARE OF. MOTION CARRIED. With regard to the ERC decision regarding the Boeing application for a conditional use permit to allow minor modifications to the existing wastewater treatment facilities, Erickson reported that the applicant plans to appeal the containment tank, as they feel the City should be content with the State standards. 7. CORRESPONDENCE: Adamson referred to his memorandum providing the status of the ValleyTransportationProgram. He noted major issues regarding finances and that there are problems with loans and the process. He said they are putting into writing regarding the delegation of responsibilities. He invited their attendance at the presentation to the Council on May 21st. 6. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 12:20 p.m. Environmental Review Committee May 20, 1987 Fage 7 ACTION: MOVED BY SPRINGER, SECONDED BY NELSON, THAT WE ISSUE A DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE AND SET A DATE FOR SCOPING. Erickson referred the Committee to the staff recommendations regarding areas to be addressed. He reported that they have met with the applicant and his architect and that they have already got statements of qualifications from five consultant firms that do EIS's. He asked that a subcommittee be established to start screening those applicants. The following people were designated to comprise the committee: Erickson, Springer, and Adamson. With regard to the area under review, Springer suggested the possibility of transferring the commercial designation to the Sabey site, inasmuch as the area intended for commercial use has been developed in office park and manufacturing park. Gerald Grieve (Foodservice Brokerage Company Building), ECF-026-87, SA-029-87, application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two-story office building having approximately 13,157 square feet on a 1.26 acre site; property located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. at the 4900 block: Samek-McKague noted that the property had been rezoned to B-1, business, due to its proximity to I-405. The Comprehensive Plan designates low density multi-family. Samek-McKague noted three major issues - whether sufficient information has been provided with respect to controlling surface water runoff and potential erosion; whether sufficient measures have been taken to mitigate traffic impacts; and whether sufficient measures have been taken to provide on-site recreation amenities for employees. She noted the presence of restrictive covenants on the site requiring limiting development to office uses, requiring site plan review, and limiting the height of future structures to 35 feet. Also, the property was short platted last year and the Board of Public Works granted a deferral of the off-site improvements. She advised that the site is located in the benefit area for N.E. 44th - Lake Washington Blvd. , and the applicant will be assessed $103.63 per trip. With regard to the control of stormwater runoff, it appears that the applicant has provided sufficient measures to control the erosion. Relative to the fairly steep north side of the site, the applicant has proposed to stay out of up to 35% of the steep slopes on the north side and southwest tip of the site. There will be landscaping, and grading operations will be excluded. Provisions for employees have been proposed for the employees on the east side. Discussion and questions followed. Erickson asked if there were any portions of the site where people could walk down to and suggested the possibility of a platform. Samek-McKague advised that staff is recommending that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-significance - mitigated with conditions that the applicant participate in the Area Benefit District and pay an assessment fee and that there be covenants to keep development out of the steep slope area of the site. Discussion followed. Norris stated that they are working to have a package put together to make the Area Benefit District more formal and confirmed that the assessment would be at $103.63 per trip generated. He recommended that be paid by the applicant at the time an occupancy permit is issued. Nelson noted that they have been talking about 'an L.I.D. for all improvements along Lake Washington Boulevard and N.E. 44th. Springer asked if they had an obligation to do Lake Washington Blvd with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. Samek-McKague indicated that they did through another agreement. Eivironmental Review L_,...,iittee May 20, 1987 Page 8 Nelson indicated concern about plans on the public right-of-way, that they would prefer to see them on the property to allow for private maintenance. Discussion followed regarding appropriate trees to be planted. Erickson noted that the plan calls for trees on the inside of the sidewalk, which should not create a problem. Norris noted concern regarding the in and out driveway and suggested more internal landscaping for better definition. Springer asked if they could work with the applicant to get that redefined, that there be an in and out island to better define the access and to control the circulation through the parking lot. Erickson suggested that the garbage bin be relocated to preclude unnecessary traffic through the parking lot by garbage trucks. ACTION: MOVED BY SPRINGER, SECONDED BY NELSON, TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER WILL TALK WITH THE APPLICANT ABOUT REDESIGNING THE ENTRY ISLAND AND TALK TO THE APPLICANT ABOUT AN ALTERNATIVE LOCATION FOR THE GARBAGE BIN. MOTION CARRIED. Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, ECF-023-87, CU-028-87; application for conditional use permit to construct a two-story office building consisting of movable modules on approximately 68,000 square foot site; property located at 800 Logan Ave. N. : Erickson advised that they had asked for an oppportunity to take a new look at the elevations. He pointed out the location of the site on the Renton Airport. He said the applicant had responded in terms of landscaping and the needs for amenities by pointing out the Cedar River Trail amenities. Staff posed the question, where are these improvements in relation to this site, and indicated that the location was not acceptable to this building. They were told that they needed amenities on site. Three issues were noted: amenities, the need to break the scale of the building, and parking. Erickson suggested a running tab on all parking for this facility. Boeing responded that it was a temporary building and that parking was therefore temporary. Discussion followed regarding the definition of temporary. There was general disapproval expressed regarding these kinds of buildings and that it was felt that the building needed to be treated as a permanent structure. ACTION: MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY SPRINGER, THAT MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED REGARDING AETHETICS, A DEFINITION OF TEMPORARY, THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING, LANDSCAPING, PARKING ISSUES, THAT THERE NEEDS TO BE A RUNNING TAB OF THE PARKING. ALSO THE SPRINKLER PLANS HAVE TO BE TAKEN CARE OF. MOTION CARRIED. With regard to the ERC decision regarding the Boeing application for a conditional use permit to allow minor modifications to the existing wastewater treatment facilities, Erickson reported that the applicant plans to appeal the containment tank, as they feel the City should be content with the State standards. 5. CORRESPONDENCE: Adamson referred to his memorandum providing the status of the Valley Transportation Program. He noted major issues regarding finances and that there are problems with loans and the process. He said they are putting into writing regarding the delegation of responsibilities. He invited their attendance at the presentation to the Council on May 21st. 6. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 12:20 p.m. Public Notice AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMI- NATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON i'iudrey ile,i r) . e , being first duly sworn on oath states that The Environmental Review Committee NON- he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ERC) I ICs issuedCEa MIGATEDDetermfor tationhe of SIGNIFICANCE— for the follow- ing project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) VALLEY NEWSPAPERS have completed a mitigation process pursu- ant to WAC 197-11-350. GERALD GRIEVE Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two story office Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers building having approximately 13,157 sq. fterty are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six located of space the a 1.si acre site. ashing-g on east side of Lake Washing- months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published ton Blvd. N.E.at the 4900 block. File Nos. ECF026-8SA-019-87 in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King This decision is effective in 15 days.Writ- County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal ten comments received after June 9, 1987 newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for will not be considered. The mitigation mea- sures imposed by the City of Renton's Envi- King County. ronmental Review Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News 235-2540. Journal—, Daily Record Chronicle—Xx, Daily Globe News , (and 25, Published. 229fihe Valley Daily News May not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a N r+nvi rnnmant9J.J.) t,Q • was published on 1,413 25, 1987 R2296 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 21->2 • 2r 7 ':.- Subscribed and sworn to before me t 's 29thday of Nay 19. i Not blic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, CITY OF RENTONKingCounty, Washington. n VN#87 Revised 10/84 D I © E I \V/ I ,;, 1.1 JUN 101987 BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. s AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Public Notice NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMI- NATIONAudreYDeJojeENVIRONMENTALREVIEWCOMMITTEEbeingfirstdulyswornonoathstatesthat he/she is the Chief Clerk of the RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee ERC) has issued a Determination of NON- SIGNIFICANCE— MIGATED for the follow- VALLEY NEWSPAPERS ing project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursu- Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News ant to WAC 197-11-350. GERALD GRIEVE Daily newspapers published six(6) times a week.That said newspapers Application for site plan approval to allow are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six the constructionainpo a two story office gbuilding having approximately 13,157 sq. months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published ft. of space on a 1.26 acre site. Property in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King located on the east side of Lake Washing- ton Blvd. N.E.at the 4900 block. File Nos. County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal ECF-026-87,SA-019-87. newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for This decision is effective in 15 days.Writ- I Kingten comments received after June 9, 1987 County. will not be considered. The mitigation mea- sures imposed by the City of Renton's Envi- ronmentalThenoticeintheexactformattached, waspublished in the DailyNews atthe Buildingn Committee are available The at and Zoning Department, Journal—, Daily Record Chronicle X, Daily Globe News , (and 35-254al Building, Renton, Washington, 0. not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its Published in the Valley Daily News May subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a 25, 1987.R2296 Notice of Environmental Determination was published on Itay 25, 1987 R229( The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 21.52 7mil- 4;;--:,-- , Subscribed and sworn to before me this 29thday of May 19 87 Nota ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. CITY OF RENTONVN#87 Revised 10/84 E C I R O V E JUN 10 997 JJ BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. Public Notice AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMI- NATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTONiu1rOyfe,i n , a , being first duly sworn on oath states that The Environmental Review Committee he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ERC)has issued a Determination of NON- SIGNIFICANCE—MIGATED for the follow- ing project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) VALLEY NEWSPAPERS have completed a mitigation process pursu- ant to WAC 197-11-350. GERALD GRIEVE Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two story officeDailynewspaperspublishedsix (6) times a week.That said newspapers building having approximately 13,157 sq. are leggy 1 newspapers and are now and have been for more than six ft. of space on a 1.26 acre site. Property located on the east side of Lake Washing-months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published ton Blvd. N.E.at the 4900 block.File Nos. in the E:lglish language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ECF-026-87,SA-019-87. This decisioays.Writ-County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal ten commentsn received is ' after Juvein15ne9, 1987 newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for will not be considered. The mitigation mea- Kirig CO 1nty. sures imposed by the City of Renton's Envi- ronmental Review Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Department, The notice in the exact form attached, was ublished in the Dail News Municipal Building, Renton, Washington,p Y 235-2540. Journal—, Daily Record Chronicle_- Daily Globe News , (and Published in the Valley Daily News May 25, 1987.R2296 not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Not of Environmental Determination was published on i s 25, 1937 R2296 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of S 21.52 . Subscribed and sworn to before met 's 29thday of Nay 19 37 . Not 0ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. CITY OF RENTONVN#87 Revised 1 J/II4 I C IF: 0 b ID JUN 101987 BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. 2230N DET ERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Gerald Grieve (Foodservice Brokerage Company Building) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-026-87 AF'PLICAT ION NO.: SA-029-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two-story office building having approximately 13,157 square feet on a 1.26 acre site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. at the 4900 block. CONDITIONS: 1. That the owner or future assignee agrees to participate in a local assessment district to cover their fair share of the interchange improvement costs on Exit 7. NOTE: These costs will be levied on a regional basis. 2. That the applicant bond for their estimated fair share of these improvements at a rate of 90.91 per vehicle trip prior to the issuance of the occupancy permit for the first building. 3. T hat the applicant provide covenants to the City to ensure: That the property owner will participate in any future LID in the area. VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SOT REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: POItCL DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 14, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1987 ECF - 026 - 87 t,l! x Ut- RENTON APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 A D R 14 1q87 PROPONENT: GERALD GRIEVE (FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE COMPANY) . poi try PROJECT TITLE: FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE BUILDING DEVELOPMENT OFPT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2-STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 13,157 SQUARE FEET CN A 1.26 ACRE SITE. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD N.E. AT THE 4900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 1.26 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 13,157 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR - MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 3 2) Air V 3) Water 4) Plants V 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 4 8) Land and Shoreline Use V MEM 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 4 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation V g5 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: kr 41-e— A_ tA.3/ k a-Y) -7L-44..4 2 • U- et dt • e.e. 4111147C"A'". 6AZW1 • al•or REVIEWED BY:40 I.MC 1 `f Tflt.E: p Ic 11 V f- DATE: l is1 NPR 281987 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. N J ‘ 1‘. g.-- RENT I BUILDING & ZONING DEPI 'MAENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 026 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) ; SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 PROPONENT : GERALD GRIEVE (FOODSEDVICE BROKERAGE COMPANY) PROJECT TITLE : FOOOSERVICE BROKERAGE DUTLDTNG BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTFUCTInN OF A 2-STORY QFFTCE RUILDTNG HAVING ADPRnXIMATFLY 13, 157 SQUARE FEET ON A 1.26 ACRE cITF'. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST BIDE OF LAVE WASHTNGTON BOULEVARD N.E AT THE A900 BLACK TO : P• UBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : I ( ENGINEERING DIVISION I ( TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : l ( UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION I ! F• IRE PREVENTION BUREAU I I P• ARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY OI- :?ENTON n ECIF, II VInB• JILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT APR 2g1987 I IPJLICE DEPARTMENT xP )LICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. I ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON APRIL 28, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; '14A).-ttl."-rnkji I ( APPROVED l ( APPROVED WITH C4 DITIONS I ( NOT APPROVED 7e A.4 LA.))/ ...eig 1 7UN--t d'?'i.,Ct tt..,4 :-(;,)"-‘et-e-GIL- C-FY -Irpit-i -* A...t a4-4619'1 ' 43=-6t. _ 0 - , U..e_oils do w/ t_1- 1,1 t)..)---LA.A-- -1-4- r-c.71 1+%..c..A.lAd1/4-1-2--P ore-c-cd,rr -7tA...(_ l'4.I(YI mot GI..J1_ AIIP , Au_J DAT L 2g h f—IGNATURE OF DIRECTOR R AUTHORI ' ED REPRESENTATIVElif REVISION 5/1982 Form 18/ 1IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW St REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 6% ` 27_C)(0 1 06. DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 14, 1987 °COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1987 ECF - 026 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 PROPONENT: GERALD GRIEVE (FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE COMPANY) : PROJECT TITLE: FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2-STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 13,157 SQUARE FEET CN A 1.26 ACRE SITE. LJCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD N.E. AT THE 4900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 1.26 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 13,157 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing X- 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities s COMMENTS: 6R AepRs slioNr i ,r ( (514 . Pt, 052-8 ) rl-r NP P Lt c,Arv-i' iscGRY8c7 To Pm Ps TRA9 gc N P-i tvt0 p66 103 .03 PeK TR p r Tif6 31 r 3ThCec REVIEWED BY: e Q TITLE: I _,P r .156 1tU5r6c1ol DC1E: 1 ' - 87 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENTI BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 026 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 PROPONENT : GERALD GRIEVE (FOODSEPVICE BROKERAGE COMPANY) PROJECT TITLE : FOODSEPVIC BUTLDTNG BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTI^N OF A 2-STORY FFTCE RUILDTNG HAVITJG ADPRrXIMATFLY 13, 157 SQUARE PEET ON A 1.26 ACRE 8ITP. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST BIDE OF LAKE WASHTNGTON BOULEVARD N.E AT mHE A900 BUCK TO : I IFUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : I ( UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 1 ! PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT EI BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT I ( POLICE DEPARTMENT I ( POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 03 P .M , ON APRIL 28, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ? O)vIAXO APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ( NOT APPROVED 714_ RoPoarco DR.NeuovA S\--1/4Gv3ro ory 1 ,m) s Es Corte o mAIl(IOnutM w1Orti FoK. C.e/wwvER,c1nc, s HouJ rk) ory Pocwr9 H f41,y)) c,Np p1ift.Kjr i5 To 1-t-t 1 s-71 , uotom 49 P/ RKiiv( 3 Nk, i 3 O , 18 p.ac 'P1 ootow. S 15 Cows PNtK I X 31PCL5 N V C )6AJ 1b IRS. SvJ r) o L j T8 > VISE • NeC1) TO pRZou l ox to Re aS C PPE se-llMG 5-1Pcki rUo. 42 TO PROP rY L M DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE I 87 REVISION 5/1982 Form 18: IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI __f REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: cn kn-c-cX IMy DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL , 1987 U COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1987 ECF - 026 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 PROPONENT: GERALD GRIEVE (FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE COMPANY): PROJECT TITLE: FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2-STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 13,157 SQUARE FEET ON A 1.26 ACRE SITE. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD N.E. AT THE 4900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 1.26 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 13,157 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 0111 CITY OF RENTON 1 NNR 2 1997 BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. I1 REVIEWED BY: `m i TITLE: DATE: Z 8 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 REND BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 026 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 PROPONENT : GERALD GRIEVE (FOODSEPVICE BROKERAGE COMPANY) PROJECT TITLE : FOODSET?VICE BROKERAGE BUTLDTNG BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2-STORY 'FFTCE T'UILDTNG HAVING ADPRCXIMATFLY 13, 157 SQUARE FEET ON A 1.26 ACRE CITT'. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST BIDE OF LAKE WASHTNGTON BOULEVARD rT.E AT THE a900 BLACK TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : I' ( ENGINEERING DIVISION l ] TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION U FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON U BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT E c V POLICE DEPARTMENT Ht'k 2 , 1987 L) U POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : BUILDING ZONING DEPT. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M , ON APRIL 28, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : C J y El APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH--C"ONDITIONS J:s] NOT APPRI . . '( r 01/4_ Zter--4 y/z /42 DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 18 IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW Si I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 14, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1987 ECF - 026 - 87 yy,, APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 I it i.9df PROPONENT: GERALD GRIEVE (FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE COMPANY) : • ^ - PROJECT TITLE: FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2-STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 13,157 SQUARE FEET ON A 1. 26 ACRE SITE. L)CATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD N.E. AT THE 4900 BLOCK. S :TE AREA: 1.26 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 13,157 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11 ) Light and Glare 1; ) Recreation 1'.) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: CITY OF RENTON A P P 1. 1987 1.)) BU{ ZONING DEPT. REVIEWED BY: /464-2-r----TITLE:jam, DATE: a Q /y 947 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEP; 'MENT 4 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 026 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 PROPONENT : GERALD GRIEVE (FOODSEPVICE BROKERAGE COMPANY) PROJECT TITLE : FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE BUTLDTNG BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTInN OF A 2-STORY OFFICE RUILDTNG HAVING AT'PRnXIMATPLY 13, 157 SQUARE FEET ON A 1.26 ACRE RITF. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST RIDE OF LAKE WASHTNGTON BOULEVARD N.E AT THE A900 BLnCK TO : l IPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : O ENGINEERING DIVISION I ( TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : O UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION pj FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU O PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING a ZONING DEPARTMENT Il POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT l ! OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON APRIL 28, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED M APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED tJ F,,C! Oczees ' o eD/4/AA/c es Co/lP//fig ai;. 4! e) peEA,,,,,.v„ey F/,•pf Fin& 2E¢peireE on eA,—" /S .2, ,boo .4°.A OA a).4 7-4-42 5ys,E n PIuf,— /'o///;// 7-1.,1s zerp4,,/,a,E..„,e.,,, 3). D esAS A607eA / e./ A«` LA.vF il eQ!//,ed.e) A 7- 77`E ./,eE O"i, S/,er•fr"ee 0dAbVECi/oA/. CI i Y L I ,d i USN APR 1-,19871 LII NUM / ZONING DER 444 DATE : 62 04_, /v, /9(r SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 18. 411YJ//V"9 RX A-)/47 REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME A—cozi.s—ERV/C,., 0%,P4¢ C:2a U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS h/960 6'%A', 1 . ,'///p , FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRC.LE ): I - II IV III VFIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINAI6' WOOD FRAME MIXEDNOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA:FT2 (: ) NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: />, /.5 7" L7 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE #1, USING AREA (A): C'00 GPM CI 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT:rE) GPM ( IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): CIF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) Z 0 0 0 GPM 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM ( CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCYANDFIRERESISTIVEORNON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OFTHE 'FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAR. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH 90' ADD () ,'11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST D' ADD31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH 20' ADD -- ' °s61 -100 10% MAX. WEST ADD101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT150OR4-HR WALL 0% MAX. NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADOi TMENT: I ?_ o o GPM (F:I 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM (G..) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: IF DfE+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) IF DfE+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,030 GPM) D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: 2,760 GPM (H 11. SIGNED:A4a — ATE C o f r' v R E N TO N IL'ridi I1--:,', r J APR 1-,1987 j BUILDING /ZOIMG DEPT. LIIVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S.. .T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pc) DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 14, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1987 ECF - 026 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 PROPONENT: GERALD GRIEVE (FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE COMPANY): PROJECT TITLE: FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2-STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 13,157 SQUARE FEET ON A 1.26 ACRE SITE. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD N.E. AT THE 4900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 1.26 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 13,157 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 9-117-e9 7 12c/110—,--aM, iUo st c Cc i G , r'rr 5 AC/7.1, op 11 veAPR2198 DUI O' IG/ ZONING DEN: REVIEWED BY: TITLE:_I DATE: FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEN 'MENT 1 t DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 026 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 PROPONENT : GERALD GRIEVE (FOODSET?VICE BROKERAGE COMPANY) PROJECT TITLE : FOODSEAV BUTLDTNG BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FCR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTInN OF A 2-STORY OFFICE RUILDTNG HAVITJG ADPRnXIMATFLY 11, 157 SQUARE FEET ON A 1.26 ACRE gITF. LOCATION : LOCATED ON TFE EAST cIDE OF LAKE WASHTNGTON BOULEVARD N.E AT 'T'HE A900 BLACK TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON APRIL 28, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 2EIAPPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Ci ti Y Oi= RENTON V ILi ; J r c- li C T APR 2 1987 Li) BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 1E VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S..--T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:LI-ti I kleS DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 14, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1987 ECF - 026 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 PROPONENT: GERALD GRIEVE (FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE COMPANY) : PROJECT TITLE: FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2-STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 13,157 SQUARE FEET ON A 1.26 ACRE SITE. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD N.E. AT THE 4900 BLOCK. S::TE AREA: 1.26 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 13,157 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services t/ 16) Utilities 1./ COMMENTS: Ci i Y OF RENTON APR221987 J Are, BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. 13 R=VIEWED BY: TITLE: [/T/L /7y 1/6-/X1, , R DATE: 171 221/47 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPP MENT a DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 026 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 PROPONENT : GERALD GRIEVE (FOODSEpVICE BROKERAGE COMPANY) PROJECT TITLE : FOODSERVICE B1Z^KERAG.E BUTLDTNG BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FCR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRt'CTIAN OF A 2-STORY OFFICE RUILDTNG HAVING ADPR(XIMATPLY 13, 157 SQUARE FEET ON A 1.26 ACRE 'ITr. LOCATION : LOCATED ON TOTE EAST RIDE OF LAKE WASHTNGTON BOULEVARD N.E AT 7HE A900 BLACK TO : n PJBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : n ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : NUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU CI iY OF RENTON ECEOVEnPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT APR 221987 n POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 90 P .M , ON APRIL 28, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : VT/d./T/ DE/\J/AJ,&,i.. n APPROVED fl APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO I T. MATE COMERS AGREEMENT-t T_ ND LATE COMERS AGREEMENT L_ . Z SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CKR9R2-WI.i=:t xxs sDfr. x s-¢ .79 zi = $2, /f . 0 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CK;..".a-SEWER OD.Ail I 2 /f S, SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA C:L RGE-WATER NO s 3qD• 32 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER NO APPROVED WATER PLAN 14E5 If AOOIlorioc- WIDS 46641460 4 APPROVED SEWER PLANire del APPROVED HU ERRANT LOCATIONS C j YL7 4 r FIRE FLC,1 ANALYSI ND A 2QtDATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 32 VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1'CAl k; DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 14, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1987 ECF - 026 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 PROPONENT: GERALD GRIEVE (FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE COMPANY): PROJECT TITLE: FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2-STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 13,157 SQUARE FEET ON A 1.26 ACRE SITE. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD N.E. AT THE 4900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 1.26 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 13,157 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: No adv,-,ie /. fit fees 0/1 1/e°Li/C ACT-/ c) o r- C Air 7\4\ B7 g 4 11 TTrtli'.Pf' DET 1. Gruel J TITLE: CREVIEWEDBY: (/l l DATE: 4pr il 1 y f7 FORM (114 REVISED 9/10/85 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEP, 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 026 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) ; SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 PROPONENT : GERALD GRIEVE (FOODSEPVICE BROKERAGE COMPANY) PROJECT TITLE : FOODSET?VICE BRrKERAGE BUTLDTNG BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTInN OF A 2-STORY QFFTCE PUILDTNG HAVING ADPRnXIMATT^LY 13, 157 SQUARE FEET ON A 1.26 ACRE GITF. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST BIDE OF LATE WASHTNGTON BOULEVARD N.E AT 'T'HE 0900 BUCK TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : I ! UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON APRIL 28, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :r1 ( OAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ( NOT APPROVED 577-/10 h tom 7/co J/thwc/ 64(-47,-- e 6 I f la_) { i 0,> 201387 Id;_1 DATE ; f fP7 SIGNATU OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 1E IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW ShLEi REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: L_Z DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 14, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1987 ECF - 026 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 PROPONENT: GERALD GRIEVE (FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE COMPANY) . PROJECT TITLE: FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CCNSTRUCTION OF A 2-STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 13,157 SQUARE FEET ON A 1. 26 ACRE SITE. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD N.E. AT THE 4900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 1.26 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 13,157 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: i k REVIEWED BY: C L TITLE: DI,TE: 4 7 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI SENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 026 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 PROPONENT : GERALD GRIEVE (FOODSEDVICE BROKERAGE COMPANY) PROJECT TITLE : FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE BUTLDTNG BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTInN OF A 2-STORY OFFTCE RUILDTNG HAVING ADPROXIMATFLY 13, 157 SQUARE FEET ON A 1.26 ACRE GITP. LOCATION : LOCATED ON TINE EAST GIDE OF LAME WASHINGTON BOULEVARD N.E AT THE A900 BUCK TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON APRIL 28, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; BAPPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED D a:7 c A/o C I__ r „/ DATE ; Cp-eP? SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 18 IVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SnLLT RI:VIEWING DEPARTMENT: C DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 1 , 1987 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1987 026 - 87 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 PROPONENT: GERALD GRIEVE (FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE COMPANY) : PROJECT TITLE: FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2-STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 13,157 SQUARE FEET ON A 1.26 ACRE SITE. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD N.E. AT THE 4900 BLOCK. S :TE AREA:_ 1 .26 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 13,157 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: P ,07 i,mil i i . e c ?` 9 "f: w, i c'" SfY C iJ 4f'``f p / e.93u / c-0 7 12 1 ceTs a d /-S 1' O/7- t 7, 7 )4.i:0 f pJ..- /o r o 54) '1 s"cal- s'7 x 7, '- X l D 3. - - A_94/ 2 ELL ") REVIEWED BY: y- 4ITLE: APP 2 19B7 kj DkIE: YA?/ / BIBSD NC ; ZO!1";. -F[ 4 Ta4 REVISED 9/10/85 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEP, 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 026 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 PROPONENT : GERALD GRIEVE (FOODSEPVICE BROKERAGE COMPANY) PROJECT TITLE : FOQDSEPVICE BR'KERAGE BUTLDTNG BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTInN OF A 2-STORY OFFTCE RUILDTNG HAVING ADPRnXIMATFLY 13f 157 SQUARE FEET ON A 1.26 ACRE gITF'. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST gIPE OF LAKE WASHTNGTON BOULEVARD N.E AT mHE a900 BL^CK TO : D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : D ENGINEERING DIVISION pz TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : D UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION D FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OITY OF RENTON Ell PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT r; E.: r2 71 D BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT APR 2 ; ")907 POLICE DEPARTMENT J 0 LL E POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BW D $U / ZONING BrPj OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M . ON APRIL 28, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7 A I FI c E /JGI N E Le...1 tiles n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS RrNOT APPROVED 1D jY V`e w(,/ J{. t. >, d t fD t 7: Le) ,I' O ac. r t I V 2) U z,,-/ 2 , S'¢ve a, 5 ,--?.eQ,-r 3e_,,_c %Z v-7-C i ,F'QL,L r /fr, i t c f ASS e ss 1 7` /D3 • p-a- '7r;P J9 'mod. 7- 7 7- ,;s Pam io© o ScP 74, te e 3, l S 7 z,o X /7 7 X Iv 3, 63 = g7:vi./, /33.E mod rr ATE 'yP 7 SIGNATI7 0 DI" ECTOR OR THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1 82 m 182 LrIcvo AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTONAudreyDeJoie being first duly sworn on oath states The Environmental Review Committee ERC) has issued a Determination of NON-that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the SIGNIFICANCE — MITIGATED for the fol- lowing project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) VALLEY DAILY NEWS have completed a mitigation process pursu- ant to WAC 197-11.350. Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition GERALD GRIEVE Application for site plan approval to allow Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers the construction of a two story office are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six building having approximately 13.157 sq. months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published ft. of space on a 1.26 acre site. Property located on the east side of Lake Washing-in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ton Blvd. N.E.at the 4900 block. File Nos. County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal ECF-026087,SA-029-87. newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY King County. Application for conditional use permit to construct a two-story office building con- sisting of movable modules on approxi- The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition mately 68,000 sq. ft. site. Property locat- Renton Edition X Auburn Edition ed at 800 Logan Avenue N. File Nos.and not in ECF-023-87, CU-028-87. supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers This decision is effective in 15 days. during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Written comments received after June 18, 1987 will not be considered. The mitiga-Notice of Environmental Determination tion measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Commit- was published on June 3, 195 7 R2310 tee are available at the Building and Zon- ing Department, Municipal Building, Ren- ton,Washington,235-2540. Published in the Valley Daily News June 3, 1987. R2310 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 211 _60 . Subscribed and sworn to before me this 15 th day of June 1437 C No y Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11 86 2228N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON-SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. GERALD GRIEVE Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two story office building having approximately 13,157 sq. ft. of space on a 1.26 acre site. Property located on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. at the 4900 block. File Nos. ECF-026-87, SA-029-87. BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY Application for conditional use permit to construct a two-story office building consisting of movable modules on approximately 68,000 sq. ft. site. Property located at 800 Logan Avenue N. File Nos. ECF-023-87, CU-028-87. Thi; decision is effective in 15 days. Written comments received after June 18, 1987 will not be considered. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2540. PUBLISHED: June 3, 1987 NvOT ENVIRONMENTAL DEcLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-026-87 & SA-029-87 APPLICANT GERALD GRIEVE PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2 STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 13, 157SQ. FT. OF SPACE ON A 1 . 26 ACRE SITE . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS ON THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. AT THE 4900 BLOCK POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES N<1 DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ONTHIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE t Q COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY "IC- ID, E' JO/ AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. OF R4,, 41 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR OMMIND Z o 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 o9gT D SEP1E ' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR May 28, 1987 Washington State Dept. of Ecology Environmetal Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith are copies of the Mitigating Measures and Environmental Checklist for the following projects: 1. Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department. File Nos.: SP-005-87, SM-002-87, ECF-005-87. 2. Exit 7, Inc. File Nos.: SH PL-011-87, SA-012-87, ECF-009-87 3. Medical Center Development Group/Health Care Development Associates (Sunset Professional Center) File No.: SA-018-87, ECF-014-87 4. Public Storage, Inc. File Nos.: CU-021-87, SH PL-022-87, ECF-019-87 5. Gerald Grieve (Food Service Brokerage Company Building) File Nos: SA-029-87, ECF-026-87 Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather then issued a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end June 9, 1987. Following the end of the comment period, the City will issue a Final Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation of its earlier threshold determination. Following the issuance of the Final Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. A copy of the Final Determination will be mailed to you. Washington State Dept. of Ecology May 28, 1987 Page 2 If you have any questions, please call 235-2540. 710j) p iiP Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:JL:cb:2227N OF R 4i BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 7f RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 e 235-25409co- 09gT D SEPTEM P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR May 27, 1987 Mr. Gerald W. Marbett Building & Land Development Division 450 King County Administration Building Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Mr. Marbett: Transmitted herewith are copies of the Mitigating Measures for the following projects: 1. Stoneway Concrete and City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department. File Nos.: SP-005-87, SM-002-87, ECF-005-87. 2. Exit 7, Inc. File Nos.: SH PL-011-87, SA-012-87, ECF-009-87 3. Medical Center Development Group/Health Care Development Associates (Sunset Professional Center) File No.: SA-018-87, ECF-014-87 4. Public Storage, Inc. File Nos.: CU-021-87, SH PL-022-87, ECF-019-87 5. Gerald Grieve (Food Service Brokerage Company Building) File Nos: SA-029-87, ECF-026-87 Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather then issued a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end Juno 9, 1987. Following the end of the comment period, the City will issue a Final Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation of its earlier threshold determination. Following the issuance of the Final Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. A copy of the Final Determination will be mailed to you. Mr. Gerald W. Marbett Building & Land Development Division May 27, 198 7 Page 2 If you have any questions, please call 235-2540. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:JL:cb:2227N 1 2222N BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT MAY 20, 1987 A. BACKGROUND: PROJECT: Gerald Grieve (Foodservice Brokerage Company Building) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-026-87 APPLICATION NO. : SA-029-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two-story office building having approximately 13,157 square feet on a 1.26 acre site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. at the 4900 block. B. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: The property at one time was zoned R-2, residential-two family. In 1985, the property was rezoned to B-1, business, due to the noise from I-405 which made the site undesirable for residential use. When the property was rezoned, the following restrictive covenants were required limiting development on the site to office uses, requiring site plan review and limiting the height of future structures to 35 feet. C. ISSUES: 1. Whether sufficient information has been provided with respect to controlling surface water runoff and potential erosion. The applicant in the checklist and on the plans shows the measures to control surface water runoff. The existing seasonal drainage ditch on site will be directed to an on-site retention area and existing storm drainage system. Filter fences will also be used to control erosion. Finally, in addition to these measures, the applicant proposes to stay out of the steep sloped areas. These areas should not be disturbed. 2. Whether sufficient measures have been taken to mitigate traffic impacts. The proposal is expected to generate approximately 233 trips. The Public Works Department has established a Benefit District for off-site improvements required along Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. The applicant will be assessed $103.63 per trip. BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT GERALD GRIEVE MAY 20, 1987 PAGE 2 3. Whether sufficient measures have been taken to provide on-site recreation amenities for employees. The applicant has provided view decks and outside seating areas for employees. D. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the project with the following conditions: 1. That applicant participate in the Area Benefit District and pay an assessment proposed) of $24,133.24 ($103.63 per trip). 2. That the applicant covenant to keep development out of the steep slope areas of the site. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES: Various City Departments have reviewed and commented upon the project's environmental impact. These comments are as follows: Police: The following comment was made: No significant impact on traffic. Fire: Minor impacts noted to public services. Engineering:More information requested on water and utilities with minor impacts noted to all other elements. No further comments were made. Traffic: More information requested on transportation. Minor impacts noted to all other elements with the following comments: 1. Driveway width limited to 30 feet without acquiring a variance. 2. Street lighting plan required that meets City standards. This is part of off-site improvements. Contact Traffic Engineering for guidelines. 3. Developer to participate in a Benefit District Assessment at $103.63 per trip generated. Office-General: 17.7 trips per 1,000 sq. ft. of office space. 13,157 x 17.7 x $103.63 = $24,133.24 propoposed 1000 assessment. Utilities: Minor impacts noted to public services and utilities with no further comment. Building: Minor impacts on all elements noted with no further comment. BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT GEiALD GRIEVE MAY 20, 1987 PA]E 3 Policy Development: More information requested on environmental health, recreation and transportation. Major impacts noted on earth and water. Minor impacts noted to all other elements. The following comments were made: 1. The north side of the site is fairly steep, with an elevation change of approximately 20-30 feet. This area should be left undisturbed as is indicated on the site plan. 2. An easement should be provided to protect the drainage channel on the south side of the site. 3. A temporary erosion control plan should be provided as part of the checklist. 4. Information needed on mitigating measures that will be taken to lessen the noise impact from I-405. 5. The proposed use is consistent with existing zoning. The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as low density multi-family.However, the aesthetic quality and design of the proposed building is compatible with neighboring residential uses. 6. Information needed on what types of offices will occupy the building. 7. Passive recreation amenities should be provided. The potential exists for a trail linkage between the site, adjacent to I-405, to May Creek. 8. Accuracy of the projected 60 trips/day for an office complex housing 20-40 employees should be checked. Parks: The following comment was made: No adverse impacts on recreation or aesthetics. F Yam.-LouJ O SEP'T POSTED : MAY 20, 1987 OF PENDING AN t rw APPLICATION' GE( ALD GRIEVE (FOODSERVICE BROKERAGE COVAPNY) ECF-026-87 & SA-029-87 ES Pt*AI APPLICATION FOR SITE PLANAPPROVALAPPRAL I ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2 STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 13, 157 SQUARE FEET ON A 1 , 26 ACRE SITE. GENE ' AL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD N . E . AT THE 49UU BLOCK , PUBLIC f ALS E UP Et.. a, 1 , SITE PLAN APPROVAL 2 . BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PU 41FLIC HEARINGS AND URING PU LIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTOr BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTIC NOT TO E :' EMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTH I RIZATION CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN FOR OFFICIAL. USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE: FOODSERVICE BROOKERAGE BUILDING APPLICANT: GERALD GRIEVE APPLICATION NUMBER: SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-029-87 The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the ponding site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER LOT A"( CAZ ELK AeSo G 49'E5 4a o¢ c.,K., 14 464 4E~.un 3 31'330- 1100 -2 ri vroE-1, W A g0s7 c cae . nAt8 Not.i smeo i a Bp.Hoo 7a U Lake, CJI4:E1.4 efAthort, c..J ' gvS7 I l o 3o Se rn+.- 4i 1 ri, l j 1-M s(,.0 4-44A/r6r4 t 1/1/ is 3 ply Pew, Nawt gbcov9 ri 42.0: CITY OF RENTON CE \V/ MAR 301987 CUILLANG/ZONING DE° r t • ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER 1 • t• ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER CERTIFICATION I. `. .,011-&, k21/(.,(, L. hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington tw, at !c-4 iLrT O N on octUR -ay of ,44-- c 1 fi g? Ot n' o cn I dC P Xv SIGNED: pt G o yl#,,,i" CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I. JFRRY F LIND . hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on MAY 19, 1987 , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. AT TEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a No'.ary Public, in and fo the State of Washington ressding at on the c)--(041% day of 1 /9 g y. SIGNED: _ APvCk, FORM 2013 1 1 r /I tr 7/ r; 411- i'- l` r7 / j wZ__ -- N 1-- y I r. L_ 14,f v iik 2 ellIP y 1 III i. it.,,, I. Kil.4eiccuuT...r N V.)1 LaJe 1,1 LA GI T L ILJ.I i t ,,!/ lL _ _T FOODSERVICE BROOKERAGE BUILDING FOOD SERVICE BROOKERAGE COMPANY FILE NO. SA-029-87 APPLICANT GERALD GRIEVE TOTAL AREA 1.26 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH EXISTING ZONING B-1 (BUSINESS USE) EXISTING USE VACANT PROPOSED USE TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING 13,157 SQUARE FEET OF SPACE. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMERCIAL COMMENTS THE SUBJECT BUILDING WILL REQUIRE AN ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN APPROVAL. 1 cis. 441. J -- 1..... r.... 4 JetkirX• Ct3( 1 . I931 ? Al I t a I . 1 4 1 11 • I • 11: ./ I :: 111 Alt iv !!! i1 -'. . ig ti wIll-=. th. 5. ftuItf. 4. 11-i!, tif I. 1 Alt 11 g .../ egtMOR01111 ditto] a $l• I i 1111/ 1 turf/ if/ MO dfiptittlft# 44 fliti; f:- I 1 r '`•:'' I I ii i 4 1 ei 1 a Aililliiilla a i if, la 13g I I i it i12. 1 ° it." , i., 11 ill -- - -- - - I A • ; 01. 1, Z...., /.. t gg 1 i4/ 11111/ 1111111ffiliftl lititil 7 . 'f! 0 . 2,...-,o• vy 1 pi t . t? I i • I i ii- fri_ 311- Li/ , if 1 ' 1- 11 1 1 4; irtrt,.ii,1-r.,.%4.. 7'..-..-..-• 7.,--; tV1tiiit-r`' 1if1rii.i" httVl...‘. gi...1 ir.1/ti. M.l-1.bprJ.1..th-:. 1,.' f- o.1-i,..,-, I3ig.4..tl..-. ln.•r.,.t.; hi.i,.- 4is, ri..i-,. iml-.-,'.* il.. i.a1,.- 1i' t1iai:n.; i1.4•;, ix14•.li1p.l.11•1 t:ij.„L' t_ i1-t4 4;.... 4 I r2R,:4Arti 3pai. 6"4,, t4.ri0i1V—Aid..a-i 4, W- 11hi fIlf i 40 „. N,\l..1"• li/i,,I. it 14 ., 0 l ttil i I 01\ z i-'. z; t " ;!..,(•:.. 31-*. PI A'.. I 5 1 ! 41; t ' i IT Atrirae._`1%; ° % Mit, 4; 47 f: ' V, I! ,--••, p . T, 1 , 11, , prirV. Erin . t• ,' r 4t--'' ' S 4 '. 1 g dirm 4 2 1 -..... • 3 '' ' ••,;,, f: •. --"' IcA"." " A •• 46",;, . 1 :---. 7! '; - . , i I i:: 0 1 • 1 lr- reit- it . I ."' 1 1 Ai,) t 31 L- • _,, , L , —•-,-- r.- i l• .., ••(,!, r' * te :.,..:, se t 1• 1 g- 4, 4f A r. 1 ET eNVIVI -•-.,-.% z pg. 411; t% le All F 4'•' ... * C.' it. i• ••••! 1 A ' I (' r AO%4141 1) 6- erzatlegt' . • r CO• 1 i t e 41 I I 44PAP45W4Nrr z ,. -• z- i_, •-,....:,: ic 1 a 12 / 447,, i i % "" 4, 4 . gg 1 . bpgrita 1 o p I, Adigip 1- i .• - I' d A. .- 4 it p 4 , it. - : 14''''''-- - 1 NY4' • o' 1 ., 4:iil . r• - - 4 tu- zia. , 1 i Vifr'. 49 Pol 4 ell " ore ." Air/ r• • -- *,: i; AR) 1 ib, ly . /% V . ••• i \ Ve• iI i 31. rAtib.••,,: 1:• zt 11 W-"'•• ,.) el All • fr... r& C-. uw ` tt'-• e APi.44114i--)111401,„ 1 4.'".' ir4i, r t 5. ' : 1111174 - ' • I : r Or .? 1 / AA" ' 1- 04.,. 7- ia: i 1 • i 1/ 4° 0 • ty/4 g a 41154 % a:. g:‘ w4 Sib * Iti * V • I ` 4: 11! 0* 4), si. • # 0. 6 N.! f - Z I• dt ; - DJ e4. 1. A I f; lc t lit-.'. . 7., . 0\ I e 1. I I 1 • P. . 2. 4 IS 2 I I,,, i 1 . 1-* T ' 1 il • f(uuJ OF R y BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT tL RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- a9q D SEP1E O P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR May 15, 1987 Gerald Grieve P.O. Box 1127 Renton, WA 98057 RE: Two-Story Office Building, ECF-026-87, SA-029-87 Dear Mr. Grieve: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted your site approval and environmental checklist applications for the above referenced project. Your application has been routed and tentatively scheduled for the Environmental Review Committee on May 20, 1987, to consider your environmental checklist. The site plan application will be reviewed by the Site Plan Review Committee after the Environmental Review Committee has issued a threshold determination. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of your project, please contact Dee Beedle of this office at 235-2540. Ve truly, Don Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DE:DB:cb:3806Z o ITY OF RENTC" FILE NO(S): -- = 029 8i E.,. .DING & ZONING DEPARTMcr.T O2Lo N r MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) ore to be completed. Please print or type. Attoch additional sheets if rcacessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME A) F.y L FEES v Q REZONE*(FROM TO ADDRESS FC) 60)c I ( a'7ED SPECIAL PERMIT* ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* CITY Re-N, vN f ZIP l Q CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* SITE PLAN APPROVAL 9-1C`(o TELEPHONE ! 3j n SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILLCam-)DD " No. of Cubic Yards: L CONTACT PERSON VARIANCE*A CRIANE*ction: Justification Required NAME c->rr 0 ) i L l.-a ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: C1q I,(So L A6t4' 611'00 Q SHORT PLAT CITY 6 , 1 r ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT v E.V r 96004,Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE (/_ C Q FINAL PLATvj4-5 5r 5 G ' ` Q WAIVER Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME(7EfZ A-LAO Gg.-1/eve. PLAT NAME: 1 ccS[ 1A,/ ice, 610-ok .C,AL4EUJmPP ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: Ot.01 SAC II —/7 Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP 0 FINAL RSA?10N 1 k A. P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE C G ln) n Residential ` Industrial L Q Commercial Q Mixed LOCATIO I MOBILE HOME PARKS:___ PROPERTY ADDRESS 4904 1 y ,• 1 , cA 1 E2: : )C) r1 y.- TENTATIVE EXISTING USE mil` F/ IPRESENT IZOONNING 0 PRELIMINARY yAc4tapv-r. QQ FINAL PROPOSED USE i1O`•lar‘i Ge, (,;; (d it„), PARK NAME: r'I ." (i 3,a Su"] SP 7Oy-AL 9c) NUMBER OF SPACES: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE d SQ. FT. ACRES r_ AREA:54, C );i j 4 r- TOTAL FEES A ,(2.7: V e ; ..: STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE S' 1 C I U V li: N.APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: 7L7APPLICATIONDETERMINEDTOBE: " ') rr MAR 01987 Accepted D Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) r....! M"'iC J ZONING DEPT, DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: 4- APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: i — 0 Accepted Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials; ROUTED TO: Building Design Eng. 1 N Fire Parks Police Policy Dev. PM Traffic Eng.Utilities REVISED 1-31-Ra Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). View Lo.r `k M 41 CR€. k. ArES Cc/4r - V4 i/4- OF c:~I-lvtii oNc-I / --t P R4 N R-N( NSON G l`t-y r N C Coo u"ii-) W! a/46, rDkJ ony:,,J - `t'I i A i/46 rr-J C2 ni a J S DF.3J ifa-oO I ribms Oa 1-40, / AWC.X)Q-O)M(' 7U PL-Avr ge.c64,0 of7 1 N VOL 11 O F P+ 1AT5 , PA-6c, 8 i K G , , __452 4, AFFIDAVIT being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property miner, owner of the property invol'-ac in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS cf:. DAY OF J - 1989 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT 1 .041 :4 0 01( 61ML— 4111k OA Name of No y Public)Signature of Owner) ( °) 0 N e 3 ") w tvA- 1 ctlti Po box lI9-1 Address) Address) ILgo"' W a. `I u 3 C RX4`44*1—i r 144 V8057 City) State) (Zip) Cam) zzs -3Geo Telephone) Acceptance of thisapplication and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 OF J E C F: 16 F—O210 ft% City of Renton u Z o ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST0 1t .0 SEPl„ o- Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all gcvernmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts fr)m your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) ar d to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. In atructions for Applicants: Ms environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the ervironmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does nct apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the gcvernmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR N(JNPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND O!r RI:NTON 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: E) 1 \in Fo o. sea., ce. 6,eoY te lk6,e, ibu IL•IN' MAR 3 01987 .;2.Name of applicant: JERR,( GE2ALD GoRi>t ' 3. Address and phone number of applicant andcontact person: CUILDINGlZUNING UEF,I . P o, ''dx I I Z7 2F.r-+rvN, IAA a 8 asp zoc.) Z -3,o0 Goi-I r r • Scofl M)LLEJZ AJZCMi- Ear g9Sb t. -. klP isc, * BWo. i E, r-re c?? u evu r? W a a g c * (zo ) 3az.- 04 4- 4.Date checklist prepared: - I11 g7 S.Agency requesting checklist: r2soNtoH 6UIt 4IN6 A zoH044, ioepr. 6.Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): e-A'14rr' CON 4IIZU01cn4 - JUNE I , IgB1 co en pl.err Nov 1 e g ti 7. Do you have any plL.._ .'or future additions, expansions, a rther activity related to r connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. 1• 10 pL-P-rfs 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 114 f2.E ALE N ON} 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other pr posals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. g Aaet. NoN r 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. RFNtoN - s i'IE ocLAvi1 Apio,eA/A-c, F J) .011JH Peg-rot IT M8C14/ #'r.(EL/ P LA)rhrb/NG, Pax' IT 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to re eat those answers on this page. P .1ELT LA)I L-L, EH7 741 L Ca rat)c-//0%l oP A 7'(4loCO styey I ) I569 9F 0 r1l c0 lv3 ' /HA 0,4 1145 54f, 87 R 5 F sire, S W ict.. I H C 1al: / J P4-t r-iNG, Fog fe. CA-12-4 /p'N/, ptorhvosc'erO 11 14 . µ6,dr r/OT It) /-x c o S'. 1-11.E" RCbp y g2/GG "i i'iEEi ' /1>'N6, id 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 41o4 LAia.. LAI,46,41/I411*N f3L60, i-ig, iN772/4, WA' taus`/ oT 4, z /M,dY c-AleeK /-/50G/A S 6,4047 Pt-Ar—OS5 -OG , N w 4 oP SE%4 op (41 cr4 z- 71,,)/c? N, 2G,G , l.(/M, 0/7-y oP lr-8N7e/ , lr4,/.45tf/H )7V/1, B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EA iTH a. "" General description of the site (circle one): flat, rlling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 3.5°io ±c. What general types of soils are foun on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. UI(-OIi 4 Sim = 9 a il k Logirvl fteic.Ikg, 4eatA _ clay 4 Savo w/ spolc, murk d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. HoH E. Picg5 7" 2 - I e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. QE Cn P4iNti 7-0t VIZ S o wo iN G, S lye" op Ai° fi&. 4.s0 e-y w tfiGN 14/w A Lt. LOW P4Z t of Pig 1t/Ng-, .or, f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. MIN t M..- tep jZ scx RE* °N s x/ or 7D t% bl5TV/7-600 / i &/%90/N4, g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Sq./000 548-7 = CEO % C6v c-°" i P AN/iNc,') h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: t0I/1') T 7/o)4 `oht) CPa9e. C44 Co Hsi s.-r 1-.105i-o F P1& tirx. G GEc pa M 0 Preros— 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Lt)ft-it— cv,v5-r12.0c>-,ot. - Ca IA, rry-Ib/NES nimat Af hog, coot...) Sr(?.0 cli oM - v,Pc o y Alto"no.9ic.eS b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? 1 4 2- n/oN E c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: NONE 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Se't/au. SL riMt. Of1-14?rlIt L.tr444 70 6C ICJ/vqg-7V ON SITE lu1eivnc& CRa sr)HG, s m/z-A4/ giem' sy s, . 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. MI2 0144 Wii c, sE fi 7r x.6) CI V Di7rJ1 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 3 - 4) Will the pry , al require surface water withdra or diversions? Give A general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. NNo14 -e*gcepr ,0/1LH 01 c1eTe,/o/1 f ,e6 J i G1c.A„ts C 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO/4g b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. iVa 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NoHg c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 510(I.wi w 4110Z 7o 6E- Q2 NtO ow- 4 I N 5 H'87,1 IN to G/ty 510 ern 0 #t2 5y57Lyy19, CM I JyGWOJ 6UI 01A,Ct P t A LoT) e P/w PoS e-rT /77oN R>Ai,05„ 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. 4 - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Ot-I bY-10 toe1` 147 (5.rof-wi) 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ar' evergreen tree cedar, pine, other ar` Shrubs grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 3-8' # rile 1-I2. 5 pM D V Prai ous 5 H72u p y- Qc77ol,/A c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. 1 4i soh4g d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 1%h171je- 5l7"E 14.1Iu.. E (iihv05C4il-f)ae) kN!1714 l4 711 X c lr 5. Animals 2, s 0. 60I OE -)DES• a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other 1206/N Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Thvge A Ze 1LONE c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Nc> 5 - d. Proposed mb.res to preserve or enhance wildlife, _. any: NO ME — tX c ,c,` '-ri f c1 tad c-f'Pib14,. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. r-liEorr c, op 4,A.07 t1T 'v%nPS 001c.o/14c kfroepri NA A C4A2.4 NA, b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. j' I(2 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: IDVILpI NA 1-0 1"vil0-r 'fl1'9 E EH Ei2Loty eia g., 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. A124, NONe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. A 40N> 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 6 - 2) What types and levals of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Pro y a0 Op rh 'lti(I e.A 42f km-c, r o4e,../, Orrice A-PPz4x. it? "pw 4.0 51:7. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 13v1L.b1/.1c, (AdI( i f-iesp Tv 13L0GJL kit,' x•-9 " A7- r,v oit)i e, 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? rZ04I ANT/fr b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Ha c. Describe any structures on the site. OLD 4)05F yfl PJ5 05P.101-/ShFr-P d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? yOs - svn.'9u oE/.../P-p /o—n /* )'E e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? -1S—Zo c z ., - .y Z0- 4o I N t-u 7rgt 6"p c;) j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 140145 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: A 7 - 1. Proposed m res to ensure the proposal is con ible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: LANu J , Z > 4eCeilliLy Fo 7131s u5 RQI i-p/MG, -rO OE. 50 d vri 9. Housing 1N NA-Tv'Cig , a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: IVA 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 7J5a - 13 R I Gc VE ELF - (Z 9 tbr'j) 11 Lie" rZr b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: is'10 w ft Pr 510E-4 `11.#1..• i . J o f(.M W l-N CoNSIOtteA ,E L s i97p,Nc, - La- h /X/4 SU!3 S7-pgyvT'jiq-L m,- w 1-r 4" eta,or' 1,./../7 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? 101-1E b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? 1) c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NOHE. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NON 8 - 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? MON£ b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. v c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant. if any: 1•1 O1-II: - e crAor ,ry 14t4v I o,, kin E.4,4 40k:441 huts o.Nam, i4rcz44'4 ict-oy6ES. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. o-hlE b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. HOME c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Norte 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. NEa t. 40s C.A E W ee7 4 ILvD, p,,viL40 Aces tx. WA,* 3 U' p -rt„Y , b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? N O - "'. 3k..QG 4 c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? loAtue4rw. SpAc-rd f .ov/0E17 0 - 5.44 M S H# 1't0 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe indicate whether public or private). y pN • -o Q v i tze d - 5712rr - /N'l ygOues4deN.r.; fD ("ic, w k, &-t/O Zvi - iMcLv o/Mti 0 egs, Poll a' 5 As w*i.-1c`, LA9wg5c-AiNc, , CAA44(..) 9 - e. Will the pro use (or occur in the immediate ity of) water, rail, or air transporlai.iun? If so, generally describe. N o f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. APPRO>c, J 3 c,vw S°'pr•, g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. _ GE 1 wort.riF3-t, tdi( /6-c-TIOt..J b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. rl-lev &CL ysrt-o i EN 'vv/LOii , 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity,thatural gas, cuiZtOrefuse service epohneanitarysewersepticsystem, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. art iCIG t+ - Pac yr P' iZ. - pow ER V rtvLT 1iAfi (o AS- V F 4 Amn-G AGi - u-lc- s 1-16, l.-s NE a - >rk--i2. 1,/ L - G tTy d F I ,vim N- /N Cd vvi /144 C.iN E r 1 g/nz7L tet-U- 14Tc - PNHoy h- / r.-fc, 0^)-0f..t.G4o0•.) e' 'hC. , C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: fr 1 4# d1461- ' ' Tr Name Printed: SW t' 61, m I (Adak. kr4.44,,rty,-- 10 — 176 11-8-84 scoff gatewooc I Ier - registered architect 9950 lake washington boulevard n.e., suite 3, bellevue, washington 98004, (206) 455-5549 aw cepr. Doss Pr Oehc + 61.1 wI L 4OI04 iA.1,0604411 FWD 1 1 , R1o1-4, WA eiSvs' T bd IL-L' I I./OL C0 21 b 1 P 2 ' -r I" , Ise 54) 519 c 411 o F t7 17 -ro I' 1 7104-1 P 4. 1 -Ic4._ 131 1 kc P, 1 V ( 1 'oci r(N P 1--(I gyp+--O Ci1= 01 I,4-1 1 w P f2L V* 1 L IG hoI j i,(11 IA ise°PO4. L1 1 I, 81) 5 Cori i r o cm f Ms.). o l41-15(L/ p - I< a 1(2-I fi focio F3(2o - I ILri o-lt.)-r -co r4g- t &P<. R-L 1---pert IR. , -1 1; 162 .¶o t R- f) 11./i 140140a LlbeareeA Agi-1 I loI &7 CITY O It N 0r, cL UU MAR 3 01987 DUILDING/ZUNINI3 DEPT. ENDIN& OF FILE FILE TITLE SAO87