Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA98-048
113th St I r S 114th St ipFo.p:::: ©R;:3:rr?:i::::::r;.;:r:. S 115th St 1')- 1 dam. : S 115th Pi limn . .. . ... 116th I St Renton Municipal Airport S 117thh St I,I 0 200 400 S 117th P1 1:2,400 Proposed Prezone Boundary Area Proposed for CPA to a'° %° o.4r Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning Figure 1: Subject Area (98—M-2) Center Office/Residential P J Lisooi1YEMarch199E tr nm rn C' o 2 TT, v c 0 0 CITY OF RENTON NIL Planning/Building/Public Works ma v o- a 4417 1" 1-44.ige":::== 6"" a -' 07f4 - 2 9 *o W.4 tth - 0 5 *200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 col- APR I 01 8 , tsazu — CC CC P mgv,ft it ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED fr. i t .ft. 00 CZI 118100019009 PATTERSON LISA C 11600 RAIN14R AVE S SEATTLE WA PATT600 981783006 1N 16 04/14/98 f; -.I:, Ii j: CIRETURN TO SENDER F.1 I VEAABLE 1 44r,:'; i NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE SWDRESSF0 E4 w:.---.77---u° r ! .._.. 1 Y UNABLE TO FORWARD FYIINO rn AFAITIFFI 1 t 1 c.--: _fi D 5 ii ABLE L11TUN TO crN0Fil 1 4' Iii4-i ig) i stfiletrikeVI 11.1"Wd1.1,1“1,h,W1.11hddikillndlumnil CITY OF RENTON 400 4 Vim~•: r_.wr....,_ rr ' I:to a Planning/Building/Public Works a e” : i APR10'98 Bpi E0295200MillAvenueSouth - Renton,Washington 98055 0 1;1 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED Om EC Cr ADDRESS 9 8 -Q 'q T 4 SJESI P flit AQE 60 072305900788 EIGHT SIXTY BUILDING L P 950 WEST PERIMETER ROAD RENTON\yA 98055fR:TURN 7_ ee;`ePTOWRITERSyj ADDRESSEE I UNKNOWN a ltid j SINVAIrVIVIiSSEe1S Iliiitlititllitttliitsirltttilti Ititittiti,ititltttllittititittiltitlititlimil 1 [ CITY OF RENTON , Planning/Building/Public Works a s; O V APR 10'9 8 / tt .. 0 2 9 5200MillAvenueSouth - Renton, Washington 98055 W 1- S ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 044 IT I - 9 8 • S Ocli3tp T# 4 illiA PIA.AGE 037200007500 NGUYEN MAN VAN 4212 S BOZEMAN ST 98118SEATTLEWA NGUY212'/ 981183005 1297 23 04/14/98 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND r- STRETURNC?' 4-_- 41\\ KENTEWAM9603'1-6039 LVRITER icit J /2r1a.1 il;l:{WRA,,Ak„U0, W,>>:I, ; <<<1ii1,;W;=t11,1U,Aj CITY OF RENTON mil Planning/Building/Public Works 1t ; 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 tr N APR 1 0'S 8 1'."i 9 E 0 ,2 9 gg1,8 v nos: ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED F$ E `IF • l i •la.• ao ' i- e.AP kAOE 1 118100022 3 PAIK RAY OND J 11600 RAI IER AVE S#406 SEATTLE ' r PAIK6OO 961783006 1N 16 04/14/98 A w;. • :,.s RETURN TO SENDER i '''fi V7J t:° i.i'vz }aB!E ',^,r"".- NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE AS At t,SESs J edt5,2 _ UNA6LE TO FORWARD RFTI IRN Tn SFNI1FR Iti p r,,..,1 {{ II 'u ABLa TlJ(_11I1:'ll,P{J J 1 f RETItfl'd TO SFf DER t s44.. 7 1P,'".3 III I I i ( ,f,i,, ,i:+ri.i,:rit::I::ir;fi+=,til,:::a; 1 L ! 1, „I,ilf,!Eltt,t !i„a ! d © CITY OF RENTONw Planning/Building/Public Works a o`"' tq 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 h ~ f: il 10'9 8 Q , 9 S ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED cc ¢ 1 1 - 9 8 5 SD 3 9APdAA aGE ***, 4 118000041509 RIZER FRANKLIN M 11307 87TH AVE S SEATIIEWA RIZE3O7 981783OO6 1N ib 04/14/98 RETURN TO SENDER OrcE 9Vx8a\$LE NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE9:`` co t y UNABLE TO FORWARD C CIIT CA UNABLE TO FCri'WARD 1 1' PERMTO SENDER t Wd ,, 9 `aa%.'t-%1-11 4111 CITY OF RENTON W Ira Planning/Building/Public Works a oCC " APR 1f4tM200MillAvenueSouth - Renton, Washington 98055 m t- 0 . 9 g W cr f CC it ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 6`t :1 1 - 9$ _ F S QValeta l P CAGE 756 60006509 ATCHER D D E+WOODS,CARO 1 AVE SW#104 SEATTLE WA 98126 TkAT737 981263016 1597 21 04/14/98 RETURN TO SENDER r THATCHER 1R! 5b MOVED LEFT NO ADDRESS EEC! ia UNNSLE TO FORWARD pi A 411n I I +• -..2,/'G18'4 Ilii,11111111,11111111111mlill Illaiilt1l111aitl'nSallallllltiniti".iill a © CITY OF RENTON A7..4 M ilay„ '== iPlanning/Building/Public Works W Q. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 0 APR 14'8 6r 9 0 2 9 5ir cc• cc WADDRESSSERVICEREQUESTEDti . 9$ . Spgiq SiEsi Pb#rAGE 118000282004 SNYDER LEROY J 8736 117TH PL SEATTLE WA 98178 AS ADM ESSED RAC:.= ; a orr ,, a ad qUI 1AIJ 1111111i,101,111«J111111 1„111;11}; iui:;m;rimiiuh, , i ::iiinahi! d -...4 - ,a-lag, _,.,a Lc. ^ /a-,3 _D Oe. RECEIVED JUN 8 *998 I ECONOM DEVELOPM T[---- NEIt3HyORHOODs, June 3, 1998 A.rvD sr_sn ECii,,p,. IdING Owen Dennison City of Renton - Development Services Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 This letter is in reference to project number LUA-98-048,CPA, ECF/Rainier Airport/Lake Washington CPA. We as homeowners at 11429 88th avenue south would like to voice our opposition to the possible zone redesignation of the above mentioned land from a residential site to an office/industrial zone. Any further development of the land would be a detriment to the existence of wildlife currently thriving in that area where the river meets the lake. Please keep us updated so we may voice our concerns in person if need be. Regards, ttiOAActi el)fitA/k.,, Wendy Clark lio.-c. , GJ A 98 i 7 9 r r ckt Mark and Shannon Nowels E .. i i417-88t Ave South Seattle,WA 98178 MAY 1 5 1998 ECONOMIC DEV ,.OI-M,cNI NEIGHBORHOOD:. AND STRATEGIC';PLANNING Mr. Owen Dennison,Project Manager Development Services Division 200 Mill Ave South Renton,WA 98055 RE: LUA-98-048,CPA,ECF/Rainier Airport/Lake Washington CPA Dear Mr. Dennison: We, as homeowners, have many concerns regarding the application filed for zoning change of the above referenced project. We strongly feel that redesignating the zoning from Residential Single Family to zoning such as Center Office/Residential could potentially be detrimental to our investment and to our residential neighborhood. Our home is directly across the street from the proposed project property. If the zoning were to be changed as proposed,as we understand it,a hotel/conference center or office building could be built on the property with significantly higher height rearictions allowed compared to the rest of our neighborhood.The height restriction by unincorporated King County law on our property right awl/SS the street is 60 feet;however, we understand that the height allowed on the proposed project zoning change could allow up to 80 feet or possibly higher. How can that possibly be allowed in the same neighborhood—especially just across the street? This proposed project zoning change could allow building development that would definitely block and/or eliminate views of Lake Washington from most of the homes in our neighborhood, including the view from our own home. This could decrease home and property values for many or all of tis in this neighborhood. The highest buildings in our neighborhood are three stories. Building development allowed any higher would surely be out of place in this area and we feel would be an"eye sore"for this residential community. There are only a few"convenience"businesses on a one block strip in our neighborhood,which are small family-owned businesses such as: a coffee shop,a beauty salon,a small convenience store,and a dry cleaner(all of which vary from one to three stories maximum in height). This is not a neighborhood or location fit for a hotel or other such commercial business. Please help protect our residential neighborhood and the values of our homeland views by NOT allowing the proposed zoning change on this project. Sincerely. 11( lark Nowels and Shannon Nowels VAiWashington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Sid MorrisonP.O. Box 330310 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 SecrE:tary of Transportation 206)440-4000 DATE: 8, 1998 RECEIVED TO: Owen Dennison MAY 1 3 1998 City of Renton, Project Manager ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 200 Mill Avenue South AND NESTIqTEGICOPLANNING Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 900 MP 10.64 CS 1713 Notice of Application& Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance- Rainier/Airport/Lake Washington CPA-Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA to land use map to redesignate site from residential single family RS to center office/residential COR. Concurrent prezone to assign center office/residential 3 COR 3 zoning and Heavy Industrial H zoning to subject area zoning Code Amendment to revise COR 3 zone. Proposed zoning would not be effective until annexation. 41/ File No.LUA-98-048,CPA,ECF FROM: Robert A. Joseph n, PE, Manager of Planning&Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this Rainier/Airport/Lake Washington CPA which, is located in Unincorporated King County, east of Rainier Avenue South and north and west of the Renton Municipal Airport. Our response is below: We have reviewed the subject document and have no further comments. The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. If you have any questions,please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section P. Ord — A cam+d April 27,199 RECTiiir MAY 111998 ECONOMIC DEVELOP!,'.,:!. NEIGHBORHOOD.' AND SI RA i EGIC PLANN:N( Mr. Owen Dennison Project Manager Development Services City of Renton Dear Mr. .Dennison, Thank you for letting homeowners know about the notice of proposed zoning changes. I live at 8811 S. 116th Place. My wife and I own a second house at 8807 S. 116th Place. We have a view of Lake Washington from both houses. We bought our house in 1977. The value of our house then as now is enriched because of our view. I am concerned about any development that would occur in the proposed change area. A tall building would not be appropriate. The apartment building and the retirement center do block my view to some degree but the apartment building has been there for many years. The height of the retirement center is consistent with the apartment building. Any new building should not be allowed to go any higher then the buildings in that area. • Surely, that is the whole point of zoning is protect areas from things that are totally out of character for a neighborhood. Please notify me if a tall building is planned for this site. .l then would seek legal counsel to see what would be needed to protect our neighborhood. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, J James Sletten 9.A.froA 8811 S. 116th PI. L' Seattle, Wa. 98178 CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the (0140k day of 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope contain) g L1RC_ NI1tf&1t1A documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewate Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzinan Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukha ig Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Inc ian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy Signature cf Sender) `)'•a°.`: STATE OF\d/ASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned it the instrument. r/ Dated: '‘C UIU Notary Public in and for the State of Wash' on Notary (Print) mARj vti KA11ACHEFF My appointment exppi es: GOMMIS510N FJCNIHbS 6/29/99 Pr())e t Name: C,ow‘P Plan Avvl doi q g r••'1i Project Number: Lvor 98 . Otte C r NOTARY.DOC r,- CITA )F RENTON N4, 1 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 06, 1998 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject:Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on May 05, 1998: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 98-M-2 LUA-98-048,CPA,ECF The proposal includes an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, a concurrent prezone and an amendment to the Zoning Code. The proposed Land Use Map amendment would change the land use designation from Residential Single Family to Center Office/Residential for an area within the City's Potential Annexation Area. The proposed prezone would assign Renton COR 3 and IH Zones to an area that includes the area for which a Land Use Map amendment is proposed. The Zoning Code amendment would revise the COR 3 Zone. Location: The subject area is generally bounded by Lake Washington and the Renton Municipal Airport to the east, Rainier Avenue to the west and S 113th Street to the north. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 25, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor,City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period,then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 25, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. If you have questions, please call me at(425)277-2475. For the Enviro mental Review Committee, Owen ennison Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy AGNCYLTR.DOC\ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITE OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 06, 1998 TO:Parties of Record SUBJECT: C )mprehensive Plan Amendment 98-M-2 (Rainier/Airport/Lake Washington CPA) Pi oject No. LUA-98-048,CPA,ECF Dear Resident: This letter is writ en on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their r;view of the subject project. The ERC, on May 05, 1998, issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Comments regarc ing the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 25, 1998. Any aggrieved person reeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors o' law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determ nation may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 9805`. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period, then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified tha' the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 25, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 201 i Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. 4dditional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)- 235-2501. The preceding irformation will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 277-2475. For the Environmental Review Committee, Owen Dennison Project Manage' Enclosure: Miti1ation Measures DNSLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Cam)Thic nanar rnntainc 5(1°;;,rPrvrIari matorial 9n%nnct rnnsumar CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICA'"ION NUMBER: LUA-98-048,CPA,ECF APPLICA'JT: City of Renton/Economic Development, Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning PROJEC- NAME: Comprehensive Plan Amendment 98-M-2 DESCRIF TION OF PROPOSAL: The proposal includes an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, a concurrent prezone and an amendment to the Zoning Code. The proposed Land Use Map amendment would ch:3nge the land use designation from Residential Single Family to Center Office/Residential for an area within the City's Potential Annexation Area. The proposed prezone would assign Renton COR 3 and IH Zones to an area that includes the area for which a Land Use Map amendment is proposed. The Zoning Code amendment would re\ise the COR 3 Zone. LOCATIC N OF PROPOSAL: The subject area is generally bounded by Lake Washington and the Renton Municipal Airport to the east, Rainier Avenue to the west and S 113th Street to the north. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1.Maximum height in the Center Office/Residential 3 (COR 3) Zone shall be limited to thirty-five feet (35'). NoincE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 98-M-2(RAINIER/AIRPORTAJC WASH.CPA) PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98A48,CPA,ECF a concurrent prezone and anTheproposalIncludesanamendmenttotheComprehensivePlanLandUseMap,amendment to the Zoning Code. The proposed Land Use Map amendment would change the land usedesignationfromResidentialSingleFamilytoCenterOfgce/Residental for an area within the City's Potential Annexation Area.The proposed prezone would assign Renton COR 3 and IH Zones to an area that Includes the area for which a Land Use Map amendment Is proposed.The Zoning Code amendment would revise the COR 3 Zone.Location:The subject area Is generally bounded by Lake Washington and the Renton Municipal Airport to the east.Rainier Avenue to the west and S 113"Street to the north. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINEDTHATTHEPROPOSEDACTIONDOESNOTHAVEASIGNIFICANTADVERSEIMPACTONTHE ENVIRONMENT. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM May 25.1998.Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee Is based onerroneousprocedure,errors of law or fact,error In judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not bereasonablyavailableatthetimeofthedeterminationmaysubmitwrittencomments.After review of the comments,if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then therewillbenofurtherextensionoftheappealperiod. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timelrame. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter,Land Use Review Supervisor.City of Renton Development Services Division.200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period,then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request.The City will notify i the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal.Appeals of the environmental determination must befiledinwritingonorbefore5:00 PM May 26,1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00applicationleewith:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B.Additional Information regarding the appeal process maybe obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-235-2501. 4l //4-- nor l Wn 31151 14. . Airport lo.: _ 400 lent-PI- •• ore t: abject....;...9U-M-z — C=`, t.. I" T ..0 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE S V SOON AC THE CITY235- OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVDONOTREMOVETHISNOTICEWITHOUTPROPERAUTHORIZATION IPlease include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION I, / 6 'I e hereb certify that copies of the above documett were os - • by me in 5 onspicuous places on or nearbyp the described property on s'....e.A—. Signed: ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in for the Stat o Washington residing in on the day of I CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-98-048,CPA,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton/Economic Development, Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning PROJECT NAME: Comprehensive Plan Amendment 98-M-2 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposal includes an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, a concurrent prezone and an amendment to the Zoning Code. The proposed Land Use Map amendment would change the land use designation from Residential Single Family to Center Office/Residential for an area within the City's Potential Annexation Area. The proposed prezone would assign Renton COR 3 and IH Zones to an area that includes the area for which a Land Use Map amendment is proposed. The Zoning Code amendment would revise the COR 3 Zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The subject area is generally bounded by Lake Washington and the Renton Municipal Airport to the east, Rainier Avenue to the west and S 113th Street to the north. LEAD AGENCY:City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 25, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period, then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 25, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)- 235-2501. PUBLICATION DATE: May 11, 1998 DATE OF DECISION: May 05, 1998 SIGNATURES: f/rsGrc9ZimrfAdinitrator DA Departmen o Plannin /Buildin /Public Works 2/ 4--/1 r Sam Chastain, Administrator DATE Community Servi s A ed<- - Lee ler, Fire Chief c DATE Re on ire Department DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-98-048,CPA,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton/Economic Development, Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning PROJECT NAME: Comprehensive Plan Amendment 98-M-2 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposal includes an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, a concurrent prezone and an amendment to the Zoning Code. The proposed Land Use Map amendment would change the land use designation from Residential Single Family to Center Office/Residential for an area within the City's Potential Annexation Area. The proposed prezone would assign Renton COR 3 and IH Zones to an area that includes the area for which a Land Use Map amendment is proposed. The Zoning Code amendment would revise the COR 3 Zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The subject area is generally bounded by Lake Washington and the Renton Municipal Airport to the east, Rainier Avenue to the west and S 113th Street to the north. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1.Maximum height in the Center Office/Residential 3 (COR 3) Zone shall be limited to thirty-five feet (35'). AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal The Environmental Review Committee of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months ERC)has issued a Determinationdforthe o Non- newspaperSignificance - Mitigated for following prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language project under the authority of the Renton continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County Municipal Code. COMP PLAN AMENDMENT 98-M-2 Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the LUA-98-048,CPA,ECF State of Washington for King County. The proposal includes an amendment to The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South Countythe Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map,a concurrent prezone and an amendment to Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers the Zoning Code.The proposed Land Use during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Map amendment would change the land use designation from Residential Single Family to Center Office/Residential for an Comp. Plan Amend. 98-M-Z area within the City's Potential Annexation Area.The proposed prezone would assign Renton COR 3 and IH Zones to an area as published on: 5/11/98 that includes the area for which a Land Use Map amendment is proposed. The Zoning Code amendment would revise the The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $54.85 COR 3 Zone. Legal Number 4610 The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 PM on May 25, 1998. v Determination thiois, the City wmill finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reconsideration. Written corn- Legal , South ..unty Journal ments and requests for reconsideration shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Subscribed and sworn before me his 1 day of Q 19—Supervisor.Information on the project file is available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton,Washington 98055. Phone: 235 111111 1/Yoffi theC. Appeal procedures are ailableMunicipalal p E. N tr ii the City Clerk's office,First Floor,Municipal O?' H i/ Building. S$10 N F,p.G/ Publication Date: May 11, 1998 y:4 q••d' .Notary Public of the State of Washington Published in the South County Journal NOTARY Fes% residing in Renton May 11,1998.46'10 King County, Washington r. ;:' PUBl\G• O Niq%•41C N 1 0 9o..c-: NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Enviionmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. COMP PLAN AMENDMENT 98-M-2 LJA-98-048,CPA,ECF T ie proposal includes an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, a concurrent pi ezone and an amendment to the Zoning Code. The proposed Land Use Map amendment would change the land use designation from Residential Single Family to Center Cffice/Residential for an area within the City's Potential Annexation Area. The proposed p ezone would assign Renton COR 3 and IH Zones to an area that includes the area for which a L rnd Use Map amendment is proposed. The Zoning Code amendment would revise the COR 3 Z:mne. The 15 d;iy comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 PM on May 25, 1998 Following this, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reconsid€ration. Written comments and requests for reconsideration shall be forwarded to the Developr lent Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file is available at the Duvelopment Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. Publicat on Date: May 11, 1998 Account No. 51067 dnspub STAFF City ofRenton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE May 5, 1998 Project Name Comprehensive Plan Amendment 98-M-2 Applicant City of Renton: Economic Development,Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning File Number LUA-098-048,CPA,ECF Project Manager Owen Dennison Project Description Non-project action: The proposal includes an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, a concurrent prezone and an amendment to the Zoning Code. The proposed Land Use Map amendment would change the land use designation from Residential Single Family to Center Office/Residential for an area within the City's Potential Annexation Area. The proposed prezone would assign Renton COR 3 and IH Zones to an area that includes the area for which a Land Use Map amendment is proposed. The Zoning Code amendment would revise the COR 3 Zone. Other alternatives also under consideration for the Comprehensive Plan amendment include some combination of Residential Multi-Family - Infill, Residential Options and/or Residential Single Family. The Residential Single Family option would represent a no-change alternative for subject areas. All impacts associated with these alternatives are anticipated to be less than the impacts that may result from the Center Office Residential proposal or from the existing King County R-48 zoning. Zoning proposed under the prezone portion of the proposal would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designations and may include Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I), R-10,R-8 and Residential Manufactured Homes (RMH). Application of any of these zones would obviate the need for adoption of the proposed COR 3 Zone. Project Location The subject area is generally bounded by Lake Washington and the Renton Municipal Airport to the east,Rainier Avenue to the west and S 113th Street to the north. Exist. Bldg. Area gsf Not applicable Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf Not applicable Site Area 11.8 acres Total Building Area gsf Not applicable RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated. Project Location Map ERC98M2.DOC City ofRenton PB/PWDepartment ronmental Review Committee Staff Report COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMcivT 98-M-2 LUA-98-048,CPA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF MAY 5,1998 Page2 of 4 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A 1 Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1.Maximum height in the Center Office/Residential 3 (COR 3)Zone shall be limited to thirty-five feet(35'). Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only,they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? 1.Earth, Air, and Water Impacts: This non-project CPA would not directly result in impacts to any of these areas because no new development is proposed. Future site specific developments allowed as a result of this policy amendment could result in impacts. The impacts of individual projects would have to be determined on a site specific basis. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are proposed for this non-project action. At the time new development does occur, it will have to comply with applicable regulations. Nexus: 2.Noise Impacts: Airport staff noted potential noise impacts to future development from the operation and testing of aircraft on the Renton Municipal Airport and from aircraft operating in Lake Washington from the Will Rogers-Wiley Post seaplane base. Mitigation Measures: None proposed. The airport with its associated aircraft operations is an existing use. Future users of the area proposed for Comprehensive Plan amendment and prezone must either accept noise impacts that are or may be associated with the existing airport uses or provide mitigation of such impacts within the design of the proposed development. Nexus: 3.Housing Impacts: The subject area includes two mobile/manufactured home parks. Mobile and manufactured homes are not an allowed use in the COR 3 Zone, as proposed. If annexation occurs,the proposed non-project actions would make such ERC98M2.DOC City ofRenton PB/PW Department ronmental Review Committee Staff Report COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMEND1l.. r98-M-2 LUA-98-0411,CPA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF MAY 5,1998 Page?of 4 uses non-conforming. However,the proposal is not anticipated to increase the potential for the loss of the affordable housing stock, since these uses could transition to higher intensity uses under the existing King County R-48 zoning. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are proposed Nexus: 4.Views Impacts: As proposed, the COR 3 Zone would allow a general maximum height of fifty feet (50') with additional height up to seventy-five foot (75') with a demonstration that significant view corridors would be preserved. Any development on the site in excess of one story may impact views from surrounding properties. Development at the proposed general maximum height of fifty feet(50')would significantly impact some existing views. Mitigation Measures: Maximum height of structures in the proposed COR 3 Zone should be limited to thirty-five feet 35'). Nexus: Environmental Ordinance; Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Policy LU-280. 5.Transportation Impacts: The proposed change in land use designation from Residential Single Family to Center Office/Residential would increase the potential number of trips generated. Supplanting the existing King County R-48 Zone with the proposed COR 3 Zone may result in a change in the potential number of trips generated, depending on the development that occurs as a result of the proposed legislative action. At the project level,transportation impacts should be assessed and appropriate mitigation measures determined. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures proposed for this non-project action. Nexus: E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable,these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 25, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee fmds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period, then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person ERC98M2.DOC City ofRentonPB/PWDepartment ronmental Review Committee Staff Report COMPREHENSI b E PLANAMEND11—..T 98-M-2 LUA-98-048,CPA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF MAY 5,1998 Page4 of 4 requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 25, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. ERC98M2.DOC City enton Department of Planning/Building/P,...,,,. Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPAF:TMENT: A ( r port COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-048,CPA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 7, 1998 APPLICANT: City o Renton PROJECT MANAGER: OWEN DENNISON PROJECT TITLE: F ainier/Airport Lake Washington CPA WORK ORDER NO: 78361 LOCATION: Unincc rporated King County, East of Rainier Avenue South and North and West of the Renton Municipal Airport SITE AREA: 11.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PRC POSAL: Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)to land use map to redesignate site from Residential Single Family(RS)to Center Office/Residential (COR). Concurrent prezone to assign Center Office/Residential 3 (COR 3)zoning and Heavy Industrial (IH)zoning to subject area. Zoning Code Amendment to revise COR 3 zone. Proposed zoning would not be effective until annexation. No annexation is currently proposed from the subject area. A. ENVIRONMEP'TAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet This area is subjected to loud daytime noise from the operation and testing of aircraft on the Renton Municipal Airport and from aircraft operating in Lake Washington from the Will Rogers-Wiley Post seaplane base. Current residents have complained about seaplane and boat operations off-shore from the airport but within the City Limits. This would be an area of concern to lakeside residents. How will City address the environmental/noise/safety issues? A seaplane is a watercraft while on the surface of the lake. King County Regulations have exempted seaplanes from their regulations. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS N/A C. CODE-RECITED COMMENTS Height restrictions currently exist in this area. Current City Code restrict; heights to below a 7: 1 slope from the airport' s property boundary. We have reviewed tlris application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addi" al info mationi- eeded to properly assess this proposal. Jf i194.11 Signature Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.D C Rev 10/93 City u, rcenton Department of Planning/Building/PG.,,,, Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPAR WENT: FA-VkS COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: I..UA-98-048,CPA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 7, 1998 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: OWEN DENNISON PROJECT TITLE: Rainier/Airport Lake Washington CPA WORK ORDER NO: 78361 LOCATION: Unincorporated King County, East of Rainier Avenue South and North and West of the Renton Municipal Airport SITE AREA: 11.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PRO'OSAL: Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)to land use map to redesignate site from Residential Single Family(RS)to CentE r Office/Residential (COR). Concurrent prezone to assign Center Office/Residential 3 (COR 3)zoning and Heavy Industrial (IH)zoning to subject area. Zoning Code Amendment to revise COR 3 zone. Proposed zoning would not be effective until annexE tion. No annexation is currently proposed from the subject area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet rfm B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS j C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS L......--Lk 6:(-7-t....e ,w-2/-rt.)Da-e--,t 726 12.- i&- We have reviewed II is application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. gy4-411:111- !` rgrl a is Director or Authorized Representative ate DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City.,, ,.enton Department of Planning/Building/P Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: no,, COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: I.UA-98-048,CPA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 7, 1998 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: OWEN DENNISON PROJECT TITLE: Rainier/Airport Lake Washington CPA WORK ORDER NO: 78361 LOCATION: Unincorporated King County, East of Rainier Avenue South and North and West of the Renton Municipal Airport SITE AREA: 11.8 ac•.es I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROI'OSAL: Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)to land use map to redesignate site from Residential Single Family(RS)to Center Office/Residential (COR). Concurrent prezone to assign Center Office/Residential 3 (COR 3)zoning and Heavy Industrial (IH)zoning to subject area. Zoning Code Amendment to revise COR 3 zone. Proposed zoning would not be effective until annexation. No annexation is currently proposed from the subject area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet r aCt- be who-) Ata a . i.(,+i coxem L oLw60p B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informs lion is needed to properly assess this proposal. Lezogan,M1)-( 14'1/ C& Signature of Director ored Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City or rcenton Department of Planning/Building/. .... Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C ft \ SeAl Ice6 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-048,CPA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 7, 1998 APPLICANT: City cf Renton PROJECT MANAGER: OWEN DENNISON PROJECT TITLE: Rainier/Airport Lake Washington CPA WORK ORDER NO: 78361 Crn,or RENTON LOCATION: Uninc rporated King County, East of Rainier Avenue South and North and West of the Renton Municipal Airport SITE AREA: 11.8 z cres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A tt , Fl 8 'mg' SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)to land use map to redesignate site from Residential Single Family(RS)to Censer Office/Residential (COR). Concurrent prezone to assign Center Office/Residential'°)(CQR 3).zQpin.g and Heavy Industrial (IH)zoning to subject area. Zoning Code Amendment to revise COR 3 zone. Proposed zoning would not be effective until annexation. No annexation is currently proposed from the subject area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Lanc/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 1/4/ ( 4 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed th s application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional infor nation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Si ture of Director Authorieepresentativel Date DEVAPP.DOC Ray.10193 v., . I, IL •- I FIRF PRFVFNTInnI RI IRFAIJ City or rlenton Department of Planning/Building/Pui .. Works fi P R fl 8 igac ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -Ftrc ?reu,e,A-h0,\ COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-048,CPA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 7, 1998 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: OWEN DENNISON PROJECT TITLE: Rainier/Airport Lake Washington CPA WORK ORDER NO: 78361 LOCATION: Uninc)rporated King County, East of Rainier Avenue South and North and West of the Renton Municipal Airport SITE AREA: 11.8 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)to land use map to redesignate site from Residential Single Family(RS)to Center Office/Residential (COR). Concurrent prezone to assign Center Office/Residential 3 (COR 3)zoning and Heavy Industrial (IH)zoning to subject area. Zoning Code Amendment to revise COR 3 zone. Proposed zoning would not be effective until annexation. No annexation is currently proposed from the subject area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LandrShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/Historlc/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS rV 4- C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS / V ,4 We have re .ewed th s application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi nal infor nation is tied to property assess this proposal. Signat e f Director or Authorized resentative Date DEVAPP. Rev.10/93 City or Renton Department of Planning/Building/l-uu,,o Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P1avl Re ztcw- r COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-048,CPA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 7, 1998 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: OWEN DENNISON PROJECT TITLE: Rainier/Airport Lake Washington CPA WORK ORDER NO: 78361 LOCATION: Uninc)rporated King County, East of Rainier Avenue South and North and West of the Renton Municipal Airport d( 4 SITE AREA: 11.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)to land use map to redesignate site from Residential Single Family(RS)to Center Office/Residential (COR). Concurrent prezone to assign Center Office/Residential 3 (COR 3)zoning and Heavy Industrial (IH)zoning to subject area. Zoning Code Amendment to revise COR 3 zone. Proposed zoning would not be effective until annexation. No annexation is currently proposed from the subject area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS NO GO41 meta. We have reviewed fh s application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional infornaation is needed to properly assess this proposal. oeL{ lit//if Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City or rcenton Department of Planning/Building/Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT7T OV at(sv\ COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-048,CPA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 7, 1998 APPLICANT: City r.f Renton PROJECT MANAGER: OWEN DENNISON PROJECT TITLE: Rainier/Airport Lake Washington CPA WORK ORDER NO: 78361 LOCATION: Uninc>rporated King County, East of Rainier Avenue South and North and West of the Renton Municipal Airport SITE AREA: 11.8 E cres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)to land use map to redesignate site from,Residential Single Family(RS)to Cen:er Office/Residential (COR). Concurrent prezone to assign Center Office/Residential 3 (COR 3)-zoning, Heavy Industrial (IH)zoning to subject area. Zoning Code Amendment to revise COR 3 zone. Proposed zoning would not Ise effective until annexation. No annexation is currently proposed from the subject area. A. ENV/RONMEi4TAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/Historic/Cultural Natural Resources . Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS AU0 LO144Wlt°i(/ We have reviewed ft s application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev 1O/93 City us rcdnton Department of Planning/Building/Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPA 2TMENT:<u,yfecel kAyuketza-tutCOMMENTS DUE: APRIL 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-048,CPA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 7, 1998 APPLICANT: City c f Renton PROJECT MANAGER: OWEN DENNISON PROJECT TITLE: Rainier/Airport Lake Washington CPA WORK ORDER NO: 78361 LOCATION: Unincorporated King County, East of Rainier Avenue South and North and West of the Renton,Municipal Airport v.,—~ Y SITE AREA: 11.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)to land use map to redesignate site from Residential Single Family(RS)to Ceni er Office/Residential (COR). Concurrent prezone to assign Center Office/Residential 3 (COR 3-)zoning and Heavy Industrial (IF-)zoning to subject area. Zoning Code Amendment to revise COR 3 zone. Proposed zoning would hat be effective until annexation. No annexation is currently proposed from the subject area. vi`,tyitvty A. ENVIRONMEUTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS No C—COVM f't We have reviewed ft,,s application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ti'. f / 4/9/93 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 IaLs-. Y' 5.,. r: NA':2 ., aa y,.- .. ... 3 mow: APR 2 7 1998 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT_ AND STR.ATEG:: ":e.?Vfw Q/•••• 45 61 ell'et"-r---9- 78' o 4,& , e_.,: r 1cc-t--„,_72.4__,o._..f__. 2. 0.___iic....e....___1,LJ 0,,a_Te.,„___:?( 4.-.e._ _ 4 w_- • 7‘ ?'t " C''2-1 1 I g• tg ---..-e.-/‹..4„___As...... . _„,..&." 7----71' 44- j- ,-----"Z 410 c...z„.....c.z_v_t_ edd54d......g.„. ... ,, 0"'/- s 3 © g 7 S s CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of subject site PROJECT NAME: Rainier Avenue Adjacent to Airport and Lake Washington Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Prezone/New Zone Classification(98-M-21 APPLICATION NO: Lam' 9S• d 481 GP 14 ,etr Name Address Assessor's Parcel Number Refer to Attached List. DEVELOPMENT ^' ! P: ,(;NG CITY OF RL i MAR I 1998 RECEIVED M2MLAF.DOC\ DEVE! OPMFNT PLANNING CITY OF RENTCN MAR 31. 1998 REC8 VED Applicant Certification I, d wr N , DEav rT sore hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners Print Name) and their addresses were obtained from: City of Renton Technical Services Records Title Company Records King County Assessors Records Signed Date Applicant) Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary Print) My appointment expires: Dated: M2MLAF.DOC\ DEVELOPMENT PLANNING t CITY OF RENTON MAR k 1 1998 t:..t..:::... iiik REC , ED Y•:::;Y:•.....::::•:::: .......:. 2::::12:1::::!!!!!!!!!::1.. isvv.tt.vv....v........:::.}:•.}•::::.;:.}•{:.:... no .s .€ ut Itc theub'etittt..i{III111111111111"Illtlllf 1.iii 1111 1111 IIIII Ii."1,11114111' 1I lxir:-:::•::::::-!.-:.:::. .. 4.. t ttt•t..::.::t...:t.:::.::t:.:t.::ttY;>YYY;;t.::•:;YYYY:Y::<::>;;:t-' e. Y>:::>:.. .t:'YYYYYYYYY':Y>YYYY : :::::::'..::.:: • t.....t.t..t.t..t.,,,..,.. EI -. t`aY;:.:., YY:::zY•s•;•::::::2YYYY;>S?:<; : ::.:: :•::=•=::i•::< r ?::;::::k:::•::cc?.::::• ;:«?::.>:;:;. Y:YY•:YY:r:YYY:YYYYY:..;;...t...,,•.: ttt::t:;:: . t•.tttt:•.tt:t:t:::z`zzY„YY;Y:..,,,,:,,,,t,,::.. ...:..:.:.:...:..::..........,.,.:.:::.......:. .. y:5t. S'.•'..:: z:•..'.;•.%:•:. i::...::.i'.: s'..:.i: N.: i....t:.......•:tz•:.:.'...i*:.t.:•:..: 3:... d.. g....:......:..:i:.:.:.?..:.... 4:..!.;.:.. S.. i..:::..:i::.":::•.%:.:.*.:..•:.:....•. i:•:i::.:.•......-...:. 1 ttttttct•.::•. v...... u...... 3 r7"1 1 1 HM i is ul.u, ..:.. r ii A :i'rtT,u fbrt.l.. npni ...r ,• ., ( ii.d..: : ; ' iiib otheir.f -,.. Ct13L ii:•••:1;•.:;••••:••;.:1•••::;!::!;.i.s:;1::!;.•.!.•;.:s..:..n:.•••:..: .:::....• ::. -::::.1•"....1 . • • ":•: :::.".:•:.;•:%:::%: 1":.":„.":%,..";:":. K..-.-ii-i:.:;I:i::;"::::::::::;:;:.:::...... ..,,,, f:::::::.>:::::::::. .............-.:•:•:,.• :•••.*:'... n :...:::v::tti•:x:::::v:v. 1..,, I.•-• ••.1 • .••• ' , .-.: 1irdio YYYY.:.Y.:. ...... .. t. t.. .,.•.t:.' 1..:•:•:.. ;: Ytt•::t•::-i:::;•:::::::' 4'...;•::•>.>'•::::.;;.:t;:;;:.:.•:.,•.:. iy:: o:?m..: ttttt:•:::•.•::;.::. o.:. :t :::•::t;:•.;;.:::::•::.1.' Y:>:;s ;•:: •.:•:::?;.....:••: tw. u•luul,' ••' 7nu•wul:r•nn••mlr...(.......... M2MLAF.I 0OC\ 118000045005 413680020000 037200005009 ABRAHAMSON THOMAS SCOT ACUNA SUSAN L ALBANESE MIKE H+WESLEY A 8548 S 114TH ST 8819 S 116TH PL 11447 88TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 756760003001 118000294009 037200013003 ALSTON ROBERT S AMERICAN OFFICE PARK PROPER APOSTOL M 11232 RAINIER AVE S 701 WESTERN AVE 8539 S 118TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 GLENDALE WA 92101 SEATTLE WA 98178 756760005501 118000176503 037200006007 BIGLEY CHARLES P BOWMAN HEATING OIL BREWIN JAMES S 8718 S 113TH BOWMAN ROBERT D 11435 88TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 11463 RAINIER AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 756760009107 118000179002 413680024002 BRYN MAWR LAKESIDE APTS BRYN MAWR PLAZA CAMPBELL G J C/O PHILLIPS MGMT SVCS INC C/O PHILLIPS MGMT SVCS INC 11611 RAINIER AVE S 312 FAIRVIEW AVE N 312 FAIRVIEW AVE N SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98109 SEATTLE WA 98109 413680023004 413680019507 072305900705 CAMPBELL GORDON J CANDLER JEFF&LISA CITY OF RENTON 11613 RAINIER AVE S 8210 S 123RD PL 200 MILL AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 RENTON WA 98055 037200006502 118000840009 118000028506 CLARK HENRY A+GWENDOLYN S COLACURCIO BILL JR COLACURCIO WILLIAM 11429 88TH AVE S 522 BOURBON ST 522 BOURBON ST SEATTLE WA 98178 NEW ORLEANS LA 70130 NEW ORLEANS LA 70130 756760003506 037200007005 413680015000 CONTRERAS DONALD E+LISA D CORNER JIM S COTTON NAOMI B 11234 RAINIER AVE S 9750 RAINIER AVE S 107 MAIN AVE S#403 SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98118 RENTON WA 98055 118000279505 118000088005 118000045500 DEA HARRY DEL DUCA DAN J+M FRANCES DUBOIS SHIRLEY M 5411 LAKE WASH BLVD S 11409 87TH AVE SOUTH 8542 S 114TH ST SEATTLE WA 98118 SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 118100005008 410020004009 410020002003 DUPREL RONALD L ECHANIZ LEO J ECHANIZ LEO J+MARLENE D 11604 RAINIER AVE S#201 E 1450-091 S ISLAND DR E 1450-091 S ISLAND DR SEATTLE WA 98178 SHELTON WA 98584 SHELTON WA 98584 118100018001 072305900788 118000276501 EDWARDS BOBBY G EIGHT SIXTY BUILDING L P FAKHARZADEH AMER 11604 RAINIER AVE S#402 950 WEST PERIMETER ROAD 9704 S 205TH CT SEATTLE WA 98178 RENTON WA 98055 KENT WA 98031 756760007606 413680020505 118100004001 FISHER RONALD B GENT GERARD J GORDON JOSEPH SR 8740 S 113TH ST 2422 E ROY ST 7414 S 114TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98122 SEATTLE WA 98178 118000040006 037200007609 118100015007 GREATER FAITH MISSIONARY BA GUY JAMES E+ELAINE L GUZMAN MARIO E+MARIA J 11301 RAINIER AVE S 8226 S 114TH ST 11600 RAINIER AVE SOUTH SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 756760006004 118000029009 118000171504 HANSEN ELEANOR HARER J STEVE+NANCY L HARER JOHN E(TR) 8722 S 113TH 11326 RAINIER AVE S 11326 RAINIER AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 118000028001 037200014001 118000275503 HARER JOHN STEVE HONG JOSAPHAT JARVIS PATRICIA 11326 RAINIER AVE S 11449 RAINIER AVE S PO BOX 1056 SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE SA 98178 RENTON WA 98057 118100007004 118000029504 118000020503 JONES GILBERT LEE JOO STEPHEN M&PATRICIA T KIRCHHOFF ELAINE M 11604 RAINIER AVE S 8741 S 113TH ST 8540 S 113TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 118100017003 756760004504 756760005006 LAICHE DOROTHY LENG JEFFREY E+JANIELOU LOMBARDY RAY J 11604 RAINIER AVE S 8710 S 113TH ST PO BOX 915 SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 RENTON WA 98057 756760001500 118100010008 413680012502 MANSELL E L&IRENE LVNG TRST MARTINSON JOANNE MCVEY MARK L+LAURIE C C/O MANSELL E L&IRENE TRSTEES 11600 RAINIER AVE SO#206 9632 VINEYARD CREST 11220 RAINER AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 BELLEVUE WA 98004 SEATTLE WA 98178 118100013002 118100014000 118100008002 MELLOTT DARRYL K MILLER GEORGIA FREELEY MINOR WILLA MAY 11604 RAINIER AVE S 303 1329 S FERRIS CT 11600 RAINIER AVE S UNIT 204 SEATTLE WA 98178 SPOKANE WA 99202 SEATTLE WA 98178 037200007500 413680016008 118100021005 NGUYEN MAN VAN NIELIPINSKI ROSE METAL O'BRIEN ANNA M 4212 S BOZEMAN ST 8814 SO 116TH PL 11600 RAINIER AVE S#405 SEATTLE WA 98118 SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 118100020007 118100022003 118100019009 ORFF ELEANOR M PAIK RAYMOND J PAI hRSON LISA C 11600 RAINIER AVE S #404 11600 RAINIER AVE S#406 11600 RAINIER AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 037200001503 756760007903 118000042507 PHAM TUYEN Q PRICE EARL W QUAN ROY+SUSIE 1000 N 33RD ST 8746 S 113TH ST CIO PACIFIC SUNSET MGMT CO RENTON WA 98056 SEATTLE WA 98178 PO BOX 80944 SEATTLE WA 98108 118000276006 118100011006 118000041509 QUINN TODD+DERENDA RITUAL()RANDOLPH D+LINDA S RIZER FRANKLIN M PO BOX 98130 14926 165TH PL SE 11307 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98198 RENTON WA 98059 SEATTLE WA 98178 118100006006 037200009407 037200000505 RUTAN KATHY S&M PROPERTIES L.L.0 SANTOS RENATO L+PAZ C 11604 RAINIER AVE S #202 307 N LINCOLN 1815 LK YOUNGS WAY SE SEATTLE WA 98178 KENT WA 98032 RENTON WA 98058 756760004009 118100002005 037200013508 SCHAFFER KARL D+MARY LOU SCHRAM ROBERT T+JUDITH A SCOBIE WALTER R 11236 RAINIER AVE SOUTH 13321 MAPLE VALLEY HWY 23604 108TH AVE SE SEATTLE WA 98178 RENTON WA 98058 KENT WA 98031 756760002003 037200011502 118000270504 SHAFER PAUL D JR SHAMBAUGH RICHARD E SLAWINSKI JOSEF 11230 RAINIER AVE S 19707 130TH NE 12855 3RD AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 WOODINVILLE WA 98072 SEATTLE WA 98168 413680019002 118100016005 118000282004 SLE I hN JAMES P SMITH PAUL SNYDER LEROY J 8811 S 116TH 11600 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH#306 8736 117TH PL SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 118000031500 756760001807 756760006509 STATE OF WASHINGTON STEPHENSON ARLENE B THATCHER DAVID E+WOODS,CARO 0 11224 RAINIER AVE S 1737 HARBOR AVE SW#104 SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98126 413680013005 413680021008 118000041004 TRAN TINA T TSO TOM W+KIMBERLY B VILHAUER ARDELLA J 8808 S 116TH 15656 140TH PL SE 223 98TH AVE NE SEATTLE WA 98178 RENTON WA 98058 BELLEVUE WA 98004 413680017006 118000039008 118100003003 WATSON ROBERT W WELLS BODIL WHITE JUANITA 8800 S 116TH PL 5816 NAHANE EAST N E 11600 RAINIER AVE S#103 SEATTLE WA 98178 TACOMA WA 98422 SEATTLE WA 98178 118100012004 410020003001 WILSON HARVEY A ZIRKLE JOHN C PO BOX 78002 10444 RAINIER AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 0A 0 n fir/ NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: APRIL 13,1998 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-98-048,CPA,ECF/RAINIER/AIRPORT/LAKE WASHINGTON CPA DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)to land use map to redesignate site from Residential Single Family(RS)to Center Office/Residential(COR). Concurrent prezone to assign Center Office/Residential 3(COR 3)zoning and Heavy Industrial(IN)zoning to subject area. Zoning Code Amendment to revise COR 3 zone.Proposed zoning would not be effective until annexation.No annexation Is currently proposed from the subject area. GENERAL LOCATION: Unincorporated King County,East of Rainier Avenue South and North and West of the Renton Municipal Airport STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE:N/A PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review(ECF) Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA) Zoning Code Amendment Proposed Zoning Regulation(Prezone) Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr.Owen Dennison,Project Manager,Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on Mav 15,1998. It you have Questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contao Mr.Dennison at(425)277-2475. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPUCATION: MARCH 31,1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: APRIL 13,1998 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPUCATION: APRIL 13,1998, 4_ ft It4th St 01) sl fi11lIth t. -- p S IIbth PI a~ n I I I I h m !% Lin Rentona,11111 MunicipalAirport S 117th 5l I ( I 0 2004400 W 1:2.400iS117thPI GENMALOT.DOc Figure I:Subject Area 98-M-2 —ram...•..•. CERTIFICATION I, 1.;:in 5j)hereby certify that J copies of the above documen were post !by me in 3— cpnspicuous places on or nearby the described property on 't—/3—' 3 Signed: ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in for the State Washington residing in 1 on the i 1- day of aria ('d . 72r,,,(45 MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29V99 UE<` Lid TER AP PLIC:A.TIO1 T OV • R'(S) PROJECT INFORMATION(cons) Noce: rfthere is more tf an en 1 owner,please atcacl an additional notarized EXISTING LAND USE(S):Master applicatiom tv each ownac Residential: multi-family, retirement residence,NAME: City sponsored mobile/manufactured home park. ADDRESS: City:ZIP: PROPOSED LAND USE(S): TELEPHONE NUMBER: N/A-Not site-specific permit application CONTACT PERSON/APPLICANT EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Residential Single Family(RS)and Employment Area- NAME: Rebecca Lind/Owen Dennison Industrial(EA-I) ADDRESS:200 Mill Ave. S. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Center Office/Residential and Employment Area- City: Renton zip: 98055 Industrial(EA-I) EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 277-6188/277-2475 King County-R-48, R-12 PROJCT INFORMATION PROPOSED ZONING: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Prezone-COR-3 and Heavy Industrial(IH) SITE AREA(SQ.FT.OR ACREAGE): Rainier Avenue Adjacent to Airport and Lake Washington Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Prezone/New COR Zone Approximately 11.8 acres Chapter(98-M-2) PROJECT VALUE: PROPERTY/PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: N/A IS THE SIZE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? Unincorporated King County east of Rainier Avenue S. and north of Renton Municipal Airport along Lake Washington. No KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? See attached list. No. Site does not appear on wetland inventory or Greenbelt Map. It is within King County's Shoreline jurisdiction as Urban. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON MAR 31 1998 RECEIVED H:\DIVISION.S\P-TS\PLANNING\AMENDS\1998\M2MTRAP.DOC\LG LEGAL DESCRII ON OF PROPERTY (Attach sq urate sheet if needed)'. To be provided prior to ERC. See waiver. T'YP `OF APPLICA` ION FEES Check all application>types that apply--City staff will determine fees. ANNEXATION SUBDIVISION X COMP.PLAN AMENDMENT $ N/A X REZONE N/A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SPECIAL PERMIT SHORT PLAT TEMPORARY PERMIT TENTATIVE PLAT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PRELIMINARY PLAT SITE PLAN APPROVAL FINAL PLAT GRADE&FILL PERMIT No. Cu.Yds: VARIANCE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT $ from Section: PRELIMINARY WAIVER FINAL ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMIT BINDING SITE PLAN MOBILE HOME PARKS SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE VARIANCE X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ N/A EXEMPTION NO CHARGE REVISION AFFIDAVIT OF D ?1NER IIIP I,(Print Name) declare that I am(please check one) -the owner of the property involved in this application,the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have ctisfactory evidence that signed this cr(C-e- D instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Owt;)\i > ni Son/ DEVELOFPY!ENT PLANNING N a of Owner/R tative) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington CITY Or r<Erl ON 6•. v • Notary(Print) MAR 1 1998 Signature p Owner/Representative) My appointment expires:RE C E!V E D r a t S SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY STAFIt) Ctty File Number v« SA It SHPL PP FP i i' I2 VMP V AAD W FPUD SM SME MHP BSP: A • ' r TOTAL FEES;.:$ "" TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED S -- H:\DI VISION.S\P-TS\PLANNING\AMENDS\1998\M2MTRAP.DOC\LG Comprehensive Plan Amendment 98-M-2 Parcel Identification Numbers 1180008400 ' 7567600091 1180000280 1180000290 1180001790 1180001715 1180000285 0723059007 1181000010 1181000020 1181000030 1181000040 1181000050 1181000060 1181000070 1181000080 1181000090 1181000100 1181000110 1181000120 1181000130 1181000140 1181000150 1181000160 1181000170 1181000180 1181000190 1181000200 1181000210 1181000220 DEVELOPMENT PL :NING CITY OF REN i"3N MAR 1 1WW8 COR 3 Zone—Zonii_b _.ode Review Team Draft 2 March 31, 1998 4-31-25.2 CENTER OFFICE/RESIDENTIAL (COR 3): A. Purpose: The purpose of the Center Office/Residential 3 Zone is to provide for a mix of intensive business office, residential and supporting commercial uses in a high quality development. Sites should be designed to create a well integrated, mixed use district that is sensitive to the natural environment and surrounding development patterns, and is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Policies governing these uses are primarily contained in Chapter 4, Section V Office/Residential Centers, of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. The scale and location of these sites will typically denote a gateway into the City and should be designed accordingly, incorporating features of interest and use for the users. In order to address differing site conditions, and recognizing the gateway and environmentally sensitive features of these sites,the COR Zones are individualized for specific sites. COR 3 is applied to the property adjacent to Lake Washington and north and west of the Renton Municipal Airport. COR 3 may be applied to other unique sites of high economic potential and amenity value that are appropriate for implementation of the Center Office/Residential Comprehensive Plan policies. B. Permitted Uses: 1. Primary Uses: a. Existing Uses: Multi-family uses existing as of the date of this ordinance. b. Parks, Trails and Open Space: Existing neighborhood, community and regional parks, trails and open space. c. Conference/Convention Centers d. Hotels. e. Offices. f. Residential Townhouse or Multi-Family: Residential uses at densities between sixteen 16)and twenty-five(25)units per net acre. g. Retirement Residences h. Utilities: Utilities, small. DEVELOPMENT.PLA NG CITY OF RENTGN i. Parks: New neighborhood and community parks. MAR 31 19s8 j. Community Facilities: RECEIVED k. Family day care and adult day care/health programs, Category I. 2. Secondary Uses: a. Retail And Service Uses: All of the following retail and service uses shall be subject to these conditions: 1) Market Area: Intended and designed to serve the immediate market area (i.e., contiguous COR Zone). Cor3_2.doc\ COR 3 Zone—Zoni.„ ,:ode Review Team Draft 2 March 31, 1998 2) Primary Use Structures: No freestanding buildings; must be housed in a "primary use" structure. 3) Consistent With Surrounding Uses: The design of structures, including signs, shall be generally consistent in character with surrounding uses. No drive-up windows or outside automobile service shall be permitted unless otherwise specified below. 4) Display of Merchandise: No exterior display or storage of merchandise shall be permitted. 5) Retail: A)Apparel and accessory stores. B) Book, stationery,art supply. C) Eating and drinking establishments. D)Food stores, gross floor area of no more than twenty five thousand (25,000) square feet. E) Marinas, in accordance with provisions of the Shoreline Master Program, Chapter 19,Title IV of the City Code. F) Newsstands. G)Pharmacies. 6) Services: A) Day care centers and adult day care/health programs, Category II. B) Personal services such as barber shop,beauty parlor. C) Health clubs/fitness centers/sport clubs. Subject to: i) No outdoor facilities. ii) Only in combination with office and/or conference center uses on site. D) Financial institutions, no more than three (3) drive-up windows in conjunction with a branch operation and integrated into the exterior wall of a "primary use" structure. b. Temporary Uses: Temporary use, as defined in Section 4-31-19E. 3. Accessory Uses: In the Center Office/Residential Zone,the following uses are allowed where incidental to a permitted primary or secondary use and shall not exceed thirty three percent 33%) of the gross floor area except for floor area that is devoted to food prepared wholly for retail sales on-site: a. Food preparation. 2 Cor3_2.doc\ COR 3 Zone—Zonii.b ..ode Review Team Draft 2 March 31, 1998 b. Hand crafting of products. c. Parking garages, excluding commercial parking garages. d. Storage of products in conjunction with retail sales. 4. Administrative Conditional Uses: a. Utilities: Utilities, medium. 5. Hearing Examiner Conditional Uses: a. Additional Uses: Additional uses as identified in the Conditional Use Ordinance, Section 4-31-36 of this Chapter. b. New Schools: New public or private elementary and secondary schools. c. Parks And Trails: New regional parks,trails and open space. d. Research: Research,development and testing. e. Utilities: Utilities, large. f. Churches,Etc.: Churches, synagogues and temples. g. Organizations: Service clubs and organizations. h. Existing Schools: Existing public or private elementary or secondary school expansions of more than ten percent(10%). C. Prohibited And Unclassified Uses: In the Center Office/Residential Zone, the following uses are prohibited: 1. All other uses. 2. Bulk storage of products, or the exterior storage of products in a manner which would be construed as bulk storage except for the fact they do not exceed the minimum area requirements of the Bulk Storage Ordinance, Section 4-31-29 of this Chapter. 3. Manufacturing activities except those specified above. 4._.- Off-site hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities. 5. Other uses restricted or prohibited by specific City, State and Federal laws and regulations. D. Development Standards: In the Center Office/Residential (COR 3) Zone, the following development standards shall apply except as otherwise provided by this Section: 1. Height: 3 Cor3_2.doc\ COR 3 Zone—Zoni__ a ode Review Team Draft 2 March 31, 1998 a. Height shall not exceed fifty feet (50'). Additional height up to seventy-five feet (75') may be allowed through the site plan review process provided that the applicant can demonstrate that significant view corridors to the lake and shoreline will be provided. b. Limits: In no case shall building height exceed the limits specified in Section 4-31-17, Airport Zoning, of this Chapter. 2. Setbacks: a. Front Yard: A minimum of fifteen feet(15') b. Rear and Side/Interior Setbacks: None shall be required except as listed in subsection D3c. c. For COR 3 lots abutting parcels with a single family use(s) existing at the time of site plan review, there shall be a setback of no less than fifteen feet (15') or one-third (1/3) of the height of the tallest structure on the site COR 3 site, whichever is greater. A reduced minimum setback of no less than fifteen feet (15') may be allowed through the site plan process, if it is determined that site design and massing are sufficient to mitigate impacts to abutting single family uses. 3. Lot Size: Minimum lot size shall be twenty five thousand(25,000) square feet. 4. Lot Coverage: a. Lot coverage for buildings shall not exceed sixty five percent(65%)of the total lot area. b. Lot coverage may be increased up to seventy five percent (75%) of the total lot area if parking is provided within the building or within a parking garage. 5. Site Access: Direct arterial access to individual structures shall occur only when alternative access to local or collector streets or consolidated access with adjacent uses is not feasible. 6. Density: Between sixteen (16)and twenty-five(25)units per net acre. 7. Parking: See Chapter 14,Title IV of the City Code. 8. Signs: Signage shall be subject to the provisions of Section 4-20-12C.10, Subsections (1) and 2). 9. Surface Mounted Equipment: All on-site surface mounted utility and mechanical equipment shall be screened from public view. 10. Roof-Top Equipment: All operating equipment located on the roof of any building shall be enclosed so as to be shielded from view, except for telecommunication equipment. 11. Outdoor Storage: a. Permitted outdoor storage must be screened from adjacent properties and public rights of way. 4 Cor3_2.doc\ COR 3 Zone-Zonii_a _ode Review Team Draft 2 March 31, 1998 b. Materials covered by buildings with roofs but without sides shall be considered outside storage and subject to the screening provisions of this Section. 12. Refuse And Recyclables Collection and Storage: All garbage, refuse or dumpsters contained within specified areas shall be screened, except for access points, by a fence or landscaping or some combination thereof. 13. Sensitive Areas: See Section 4-31-34; Chapter 32,Title IV; Chapter 8, Title VIII; Section 4- 31-35; Chapter 19,Title IV; Section 4-31-31; and Chapter 6,Title IV of the City Code. 14. Landscaping/Improvements a. Street Frontage: Lots abutting public streets shall have a minimum landscaping strip of ten feet(10'), except where reduced through the site plan review process. b. Pedestrian Connection: A pedestrian connection shall be provided from a public entrance to the street unless the Hearing Examiner determines that the requirement would unduly endanger the pedestrian. c. Special Requirements: 1) If the COR 3 lot is adjacent to a lot zoned R-1, R-5,R-8, R-10, R-14 or RM-I, or King County Zones R-1, R-4, R-6 or R-8, then there shall be a fifteen foot (15') sight- obscuring landscaped strip. The Hearing Examiner may waive the sight-obscuring provision in order to provide reasonable access to the property. If the street is designated arterial in the Transportation Element of the City Comprehensive Plan, nonsight-obscuring landscaping shall be provided unless otherwise determined by the Hearing Examiner. These provisions may be modified by the Hearing Examiner where the applicant can show that the same or better results will occur because of creative design solutions, unique aspects or use, etc.,that cannot be fully anticipated at this time. 2) If the COR 3 lot abuts a lot zoned R-1,R-5,R-8,R-10, R-14 or RM-I, or King County Zones R-1, R-4, R-6 or R-8, then there shall be a fifteen foot (15') sight-obscuring landscaped strip. A ten foot (10') sight-obscuring landscaping strip may be allowed through the site plan process provided that a solid six foot (6') high barrier wall is provided within the landscaped strip and a maintenance agreement or easement for the landscape strip is secured. A solid barrier wall shall not be located closer than five feet (5')to an abutting lot zoned R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10, R-14 or RM-I, or King County Zones R-1,R-4,R-6 or R-8,. These provisions may be modified by the Hearing Examiner where the applicant can show that the same or better results will occur because of creative design solutions, unique aspects or use, etc.,that cannot be fully anticipated at this time. 3) If the COR 3 lot abuts or is adjacent to a lot zoned R-1, R-5,R-8,R-10,R-14 or RM-I, or King County Zones R-1, R-4,R-6 or R-8, then all outdoor storage, loading, repair, maintenance or work areas shall be screened by a fence or landscaping or some combination thereof as determined by the reviewing official. Loading docks shall not 5 Cor3_2.doc\ COR 3 Zone—ZonL... Code Review Team Draft 2 March 31, 1998 be located adjacent to or abutting a lot zoned R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10, R-14 or RM-I, or King County Zones R-1,R-4,R-6 or R-8. These provisions may be modified by the Hearing Examiner where the applicant can show that the same or better results will occur because of creative design solutions, unique aspects or use,etc.,that cannot be fully anticipated at this time. E. Conflicts: In the event that there is a conflict between either the development standards or special development standards listed above and the standards and regulations contained in other ordinance(s), the Zoning Administrator shall determine which ordinance shall prevail based upon the intent of the Zones. Life, safety and public health ordinances are assumed to prevail. 6 Cor3_2.doc\ COR 3 Zone—Zonii. t, ' ode Review Team Draft 2 March 31, 1998 Associated Amendments 4-31-33 SITE PLAN REVIEW: B. Applicability: 1. For all development in the Industrial Light (IL), Commercial Office (CO) and Public Use P-1) Zones and CC, CN, CM, CA, CB and the Mixed Residential (MR), Manufactured Housing Park (T), Multi-Family (MF), Center Office/Residential 3 (COR 3) and Planned Neighborhood Residential (PNR) Zones, secondary uses and other uses specified within each zoning district, all development with the Valley Planning Area and for all hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities. For all development in the Light Industrial (L-1) and Heavy Industrial (H-1)Zones that fall within Zone 1 or Zone 2 of an Aquifer Protection Area. (Ord. 4404, 6-7-93) C. Site Plan Review Procedures: 8. Upon receipt of final departmental comments and after the close of the public comment period, the Environmental Review Committee shall determine the necessity for a public hearing on the site plan for those projects that have not been reviewed as part of a master site plan pursuant to Chapter 35,Title IV, of the City Code. A public hearing before the Hearing Examiner shall be required for projects not reviewed pursuant to Chapter 35,Title IV, if: a.Unresolved Concerns: The Environmental Review Committee determines that based on departmental comments or public input there are significant unresolved concerns that are raised by the proposal;or b.Hearing Request: The applicant has requested a public hearing;or c. Size: The proposed project is larger than any one of the following: One hundred(100)multi-family residential units; One hundred thousand(100,000) square feet of gross floor area in the IL or CO Zone or other zones in the Valley Planning Area; Twenty five thousand (25,000) square feet of gross floor area in the CC, CN, CD, CA, CS, CO, COR 3 or P-1 Zones outside the Valley Planning Area; Four(4)stories or sixty feet(60')in height; Three hundred(300)parking stalls; or Ten(10)acres in size. d. Adjacent To Single-Family Zone: Any commercial property is adjacent to a single- family zone. e. Exception For Secondary Use: Where site plan review is required for secondary uses in the zoning districts, but would otherwise be exempt from the site plan review 7 Cor3_2.doc\ COR 3 Zone—Zon...b Code Review Team Draft 2 March 31, 1998 requirements, public notice of the proposed action and public hearing shall not be required. (Ord. 4551, 9-18-95) 4-20-12 SIZE,NUMBER AND HEIGHT OF SIGNS: C. Commercial and Industrial Zones: In all commercial and industrial zones the following shall apply: 10. Special Requirements for Secondary Uses in the CO (Commercial Office) Zone and all uses in the COR 3 Zone: a. Signage for specified Secondary Uses in the CO Zone, and all uses in the COR 3 Zone, within 100 feet of a lot zoned R-1,R-5,R-8,R-10,R-14,and RM-I: 1) One freestanding sign per street frontage. Freestanding signs shall be limited to six feet (6') in height above grade and ten feet (10') from any public right-of-way. Each sign shall not exceed an area of one (1) square foot for each lineal foot of property frontage,not to exceed one hundred(100) square feet per sign face and a maximum of two hundred(200) square feet including all sign faces. 2) In addition to the freestanding sign(s), wall signs are permitted with a total copy area not exceeding ten percent (10%) of the building facade to which it is applied. Ord. 4649, 1-6-1997) k 8 Cor3_2.doc\ 113th St N -.-...-.................... .. . .. S 114th St Ilk Pro: .::::COR:::3.................. j it 115th St rop. S115 t h P 1ci:S 116 t t 116th St Renton op Municipal co Airport S 117th St I 0\\\\200 400 S 117th P1 1 :2,4 0 0 Figure 1 : Subject Area (98—M- 2) Proposed Prezone Boundary Area Proposed for CPA to II Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Center Office/Residential ED/N/SP 0. Dennison 23 March 1998 AMENDMENT 98-M-2—Along Rainier Avenue, Adjacent to Airport and Lake Washington Proposal Summary The proposal is comprised of three separate actions, processed and reviewed concurrently. The proposal involves amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendment and Zoning Code to allow a concurrent prezone of an area in the City's Potential Annexation Area. (see attached map) The majority of the area proposed for prezoning is currently designated Residential Single Family(RS)and the remainder is Employment Area—Industrial(EAI). The EAI portion is a fragment of a tax lot that crosses the Renton corporate boundary and comprises a portion of the Renton Municipal Airport. The area designated EAI is not proposed for redesignation on the Land Use Map. The area currently designated RS is proposed for amendment to Center Office/Residential (COR). The prezone would assign zoning consistent with the existing EAI and proposed COR land use designations, Heavy Industrial and COR 3 respectively. The Heavy Industrial zoning is intended to allow the current airport use as a seaplane ramp to continue. The COR land use designation is implemented differently on individual sites. Therefore, a new COR zone, COR 3, must be adopted to respond to the specific circumstances of the subject area, consistent with the COR policy direction in the Comprehensive Plan. City of Renton zoning adopted through the prezone process is not implemented until portions of the subject area annex to the City. No annexations have been initiated at this time. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTCN MAR 1 1998 RECEIVED 98m2_sum.doc\ AMENDMENT 98-M-2 — Along Rainier Avenue, Adjacent to Airport and Lake Washington DESCRIPTION: The proposal would amend the Land Use Map for an area of unincorporated King County east of Rainier Avenue S. and north of the Renton Municipal Airport. (Figure 1) Center Office/Residential COR) is proposed to supplant the existing Residential Single Family (RS) designation. Existing uses include multi-family, retirement residence and mobile/manufactured home parks. A preliminary proposal has been advanced to develop the area currently used for mobile/manufactured home parks, Area A, for office, hotel and conference center uses. This amendment to the Land Use Map is intended to create the opportunity for the proposed development in Area A and to reconcile the existing development outside Area A with potential zoning consistent with the land use designation. Rather than a concurrent rezone, as occurs with Land Use Map amendments within the city limits, a prezone of the same area will be processed concurrent to this amendment. The prezone process allows the City Council to adopt City zoning for areas outside the city limits. Renton zoning designations are not implemented until the area annexes. ISSUE SUMMARY: 1. The proposed Land Use Map amendment for Area A would encourage the transition of two mobile home parks to higher intensity uses. This would result in a loss of affordable housing and would require that current residents relocate. Loss of affordable housing opportunities appears to be contrary to King County and City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policies. 2. The proposed amendment would allow a significant change of potential land uses from those allowed under the existing RS designation. 3. The Comprehensive Plan directs that Residential Multi-Family — Infill (RM-I) and Employment Area-Commercial designations (EAC)not be expanded. 4. Area A is small relative to typical EAC and Center Office Residential (COR) designations. Additionally,the site is surrounded by existing residential uses to the north and south. 5. The location of the Area A on Lake Washington offers a high amenity value and the potential public benefit of access to the shoreline. The existing RS designation limits the exposure of the shoreline to the public. RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY: DEVELOPMENT PLANNINI Amend the Land Use Map from Residential Single Family to Center Office/Residential. CITY OF RENTON Amend the Zoning Code to create a new zone, COR 3,to apply to the subject properties. MAR 3 1 1998 Prezone the subject parcels COR 3, consistent with the proposed Land Use designation. riCEID ANALYSIS: During the comprehensive planning process that lead to the current Comprehensive Plan, analysis of areas outside the city limits was not as rigorous as it was for areas within the City. The Residential Single Family designation was used as a default or temporary category in many instances. It is unlikely that the existing designation was intended to stand without closer analysis, as annexation became a more imminent possibility. Under King County zoning, the northernmost parcel is designated R-12 and the remainder are R-48, indicating a base density of 12 and 48 units per acre respectively. (Figure 3) Existing, conventional frame-construction residential uses include rental and owner-occupied multi-family, ranging from 18.6 to 40.2 units per acre and a retirement residence. The location of these uses, primarily between the airport and the arterial, does not appear appropriate for single family development as indicated by the current Comprehensive Plan designation. Further,there is no reason to expect the existing multi-family uses to transition to lower intensity residential uses. Mobile/manufactured home parks are the current use on the remainder of the area. This is the only existing use that is consistent with the RS designation. Shown on the attached maps as Area A,this six- acre site is under consideration for the development of a hotel with offices and a conference center. Only 4.1 acres of Area A are developable, with the remaining two acres submerged under Lake Washington. Increasing property values will encourage redevelopment of Area A under either the County's or the City's jurisdiction. Existing King County zoning would allow, among others, such uses as multi-family up to 48 units per acre, conference centers, sports clubs and small-scale retail. The shoreline of Lake Washington is listed as a shoreline of the State under the State's Shoreline Management Act. Lake Washington shorelines within the city limits are regulated under the City's Shoreline Master Program (SMP) and designated an Urban environment. The City's SMP's Specific Use Regulations, as currently written, state that"[n]ew commercial developments on Lake Washington which are neither water dependent nor water related will not be permitted upon the shoreline". This means that any commercial structures on the site must be outside the 200 foot area of regulation under the Shoreline Master Program. Removing the buffer area further limits the buildable area of the site to 1.9 acres. The 200 foot buffer area could be used for parking. Proposed changes to the SMP would allow certain "water-enjoyment" uses, which may include the proposed uses, within the shoreline setback providing that site design allowed for significant public access to the shoreline. Residential uses are currently allowed in regulated shoreline areas. Airport-related height limits would also constrain development of Area A. Allowable maximum structure heights increase from about 61 feet at the water's edge to about 108 feet at the western boundary of the subject area. Height restrictions would not preclude development of the site for the proposed uses. This analysis considered three potential Land Use Map and zoning scenarios. All scenarios assume that Area A will transition to the proposed office, hotel and conference center uses. 1) Center Office/Residential Land Use and COR Zoning Encourage projects throughout the designation which create cohesive, quality, and landmark developments integrated with natural amenities. The intention is to create a compact, urban development with high amenity values that is a gateway to the City." (Objective LU-U) Under this land use scenario, all properties in the subject area would be zoned COR. Unlike other zones for which the uses and development standards are applied somewhat uniformly, the COR is tailored to specific sites, although each COR Zone must implement the Center Office/Residential policies. Since 2 98_M_2.DOC\ this option would require that a new COR Zone be drafted for this site, uses and development standards could be identified that accommodate both existing and proposed development. Policy LU-124 states, "Primary uses should include complexes of offices or residential development, hotels and convention centers, research and development facilities, and corporate headquarters." The uses proposed for Area A, as well as existing uses outside Area A, are consistent with this policy direction. Although new multi-family uses are limited to 35 units per net acre by Policy LU-131, code written for the site could include existing multi-family without specifying the density. The uses proposed for Area A and retirement residences are permitted uses in both existing COR Zones, COR 1 Stoneway Concrete site) and COR 2 (Port Quendall). Multi-family uses are allowed in both zones but only up to 25 units per net acre. There are several factors that will limit development as it was envisioned for the designation. First, about 65%of the area proposed for POR is already significantly developed. This limits possibilities for integrating uses across the zone. Second, the area is smaller than has been typical for COR designations, 12 acres (4.1 redevelopable) versus 56 for COR 1 and 92 for COR 2. This will limit the mix of uses that can be accommodated on the site and will limit the ability of the site to provide significant gateway identification. However, the policies do not specify criteria for implementation of the designation, apart from the criteria for all Center designations. Policy LU-92 identifies areas appropriate for Centers. Policy LU-92. Centers should be designated where there are the following characteristics: a. a nucleus of existing multi-use development. b. potential for redevelopment, or vacant land to encourage significant concentration of development. c. principal gateways to the City as defined in the Community Design Section of the Land Use Element. d. Center locations should be located on major transit and transportation routes. e. Center locations should be served by the City's arterial street system. The proposal is consistent with b., c., d., and e. It is not consistent with a. since all existing development is residential. 2) Employment Area—Commercial Land Use and Commercial Arterial (CA)Zoning Provide for commercial and residential uses requiring large amounts of land and/or high visibility and access to large volumes of automobile traffic in areas outside of Centers and the Center Downtown designations."(Objective LU-AA) Under this scenario, all subject properties would be designated EAC and zoned CA. The CA Zone is intended to "provide suitable environments for `strip' commercial development" along major arterial streets. An extensive range of commercial uses are allowed in the zone. Some of these would be incompatible with the residential context of Area A, e.g. auto repair, service or sales lots. Potential mechanisms to limit the range of uses and specify development standards above those required by the CA Zone would include a development agreement, a pre-annexation agreement or including such provisions in the prezoning ordinance. However, the difficulty with all three solutions is that the City has no reasonable mechanisms for tracking such agreements for application at some future time. 3 98_M_2.DOC1 Development approvals are typically based on the mapped zoning, unless documentation of overriding regulations is discovered. The dependability of such discovery is questionable. Additionally, the suggestion of allowing strip commercial uses in this area may arouse the ire of surrounding property owners,particularly the single family area contiguous to the north. All uses proposed for Area A would be allowed under CA zoning. Retirement residences are not currently a permitted use. Unless the CA Zone is amended, the retirement residence would become nonconforming. Multi-family uses are currently primary uses at densities up to 20 units per net acre. While only one of the existing multi-family uses would be conforming under current CA regulations, an amendment is proposed to the CA Zone that would prohibit new multi-family uses. Options for this change include making all existing multi-family uses nonconforming or, alternatively, maintaining existing multi-family as a permitted use. Providing that no density is specified, the latter would allow existing multi-family uses in the subject area to remain conforming upon annexation. 3) Combination of Employment Area — Commercial with CA Zoning and Residential Multi- Family Infill with RM-I Zoning Under this option, existing multi-family development would be zoned RM-I, and CA would be applied to Area A. From the standpoint of making existing uses conforming, this option has several benefits. First, the retirement residence would be a conforming use in the RM-I where it is not under the CA. Second, the RM-I includes all multi-family uses existing as of June, 1993, as primary uses. All multi- family uses in the subject area appear to have been legally existing as of this date. The drawback to Option 3 is that restricting the area proposed for EAC/CA to Area A makes the commercial designation more difficult to rationalize due to the small, isolated nature of the site. In practice, this option would function the same as Option 2, since the multi-family area is currently developed. However, it gives the appearance of providing special favor to the property owners of Area A. As with Option 2,the issue of limiting future uses on the site is problematic. CAPACITY ANALYSIS: Lying outside the city limits, changes to the land use designations for this area will not affect the City's capacity to accommodate forecast growth. All subject parcels are currently developed, under the assumptions of the capacity model, and thus would have no remaining capacity. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE: Option 2, EAC, and Option 3, RM-I and EAC, are inconsistent with Land Use Element policies that proscribe the expansion of the RM-I and EAC designations. Policy LU-69. Residential Multi-Family Infill designations should not be expanded. Land within the districts should be used efficiently to meet multi family housing needs. Policy LU-176. Increased demand for commercial uses should be accommodated through redevelopment and intensification of Employment Area — Commercial designations rather than expansion of those areas. The proposed change also raises a consistency issue with the Housing Element. The intent of the amendment is, in fact, to facilitate the conversion of these parks to more intensive land uses. In direct 4 98_M_2.DOC\ conflict with the proposal, the Housing Element policies support the preservation of mobile/manufactured home parks to maintain affordable housing in the city. Policy H-70. Upon annexation into the City of Renton existing mobile home parks and manufactured housing developments will have a land use and zoning designation applied to them that match their current use and conditions. Objective H-J: The City shall assist in converting existing mobile home parks to resident ownership through grant funding, technical assistance, coordination with nonprofit groups, and general support. Policy H-71. The owners and residents of mobile home parks annexed into the City, shall be approached about the possibility of conversion to resident or nonprofit park ownership. If no agreement can be reached and the current owners desire to apply for a conversion to another land use, the City shall make all possible efforts to assist the relocation of affected households with incomes below 50% of Countywide median income. Park owners will be strongly encouraged to voluntarily contribute financial resources towards the relocation of low income residents. Policy H-72. The City shall work with King County, the King County Housing Authority, and nonprofit housing authorities to develop or expand manufactured housing parks which are designed to accommodate relocated mobile homes and trailers. Policy H-70 appears to have the greatest conflict with the proposal. A strict adherence to the policy would appear to preclude changing the RS designation. (see Comprehensive Plan Amendment 98-T-8) Policy H-71 suggests that the City need not oppose the conversion of mobile home parks to other uses, provided that the residents have some opportunity to purchase the site. It is not likely that this will occur, given the high value of the two sites which are assessed at $463,500 and $1,431,800. However, the policies appear to commit the City to assisting toward this end. There is also an explicit commitment on the part of the City to assist in relocation of low-income households to other sites. These commitments would be obviated by a closure of the parks prior to annexation. ZONING CONCURRENCY: The proposal would result in the creation of a new zone implementing the Center Office/Residential land use designation. CONCLUSION: There is currently an inconsistency between Renton's adopted land use designation for this area and existing and potential land uses under King County zoning. Only the mobile/manufactured home park uses in Area A are consistent with the Residential Single Family designation. As property values rise, Area A is anticipated to transition to a more intensive use. Currently, King County zoning would allow a variety of uses, including multi-family up to 48 units per acre and conference centers. The City has an opportunity to reconsider the long-term plans for this area and pave the way for annexation of the area. The subject area is within the City's Potential Annexation Area, adjacent to the city limits. Should the existing land use designation be retained for the subject area, it is probable that annexation will not happen until after development has occurred, if ever. The Center Office/Residential designation provides the City with the ability to tailor a zone to the specific circumstances of this site. Both existing 5 98_M_2.DOC\ and proposed uses can be accommodated and compatibility reasonably assured within policy framework of the COR designation. 6 98_M_2.DOC\ AMENDMENT 98-M-2 -ATTACHMENT A CENTER OFFICE/RESIDENTL4L POLICIES Objective LU-U: Encourage projects throughout the designation which create cohesive, quality, and landmark developments integrated with natural amenities. The intention is to create a compact, urban development with high amenity values that is a gateway to the City. Policy LU-124. Primary uses should include complexes of offices or residential development, hotels and convention centers, research and development facilities, and corporate headquarters. Policy LU-125. Commercial uses such as retail and services should also be permitted provided that they support the primary uses of the site and are architecturally and functionally integrated into the development. An exception to this limitation on commercial uses may occur if a major commercial use providing high economic value to the City is proposed with small-scale, multiple businesses, and is designed with the scale and intensity envisioned for COR. Policy LU-126. Individual properties may have a single use if they can be developed at the scale and intensity envisioned for the designation, or ifproposed as part of a phased development and multi- parcel proposal which includes a mix of uses. Policy L U-12Z Incentives which encourage a mix of uses and structured parking should be provided in development regulations. Policy LU-128. Flexibility of use combinations and development standards should be allowed to encourage redevelopment of sites which have significant constraints including environmental, access and land assembly constraints. Policy LU-129. Private/public partnerships should be encouraged to plan for infrastructure development,public uses and amenities. Policy LU-130. A public review process should be required for proposed development plans of each parcel with separate ownership or abutting parcels of the same ownership within the Center. Properties may be combined for public review. Such plans should coordinate the mix and compatibility of uses, residential density, conceptual building, site and landscape design, identification ofgateway features, signs, circulation, transit opportunities, and phasing. Policy LU-131. Maximum residential density should be 35 dwelling units per acre. The same area used for commercial and office development can also be used to calculate residential density. When proposed development does not involve a mix of uses, then minimum residential density should be 5 dwelling units per net acre. Policy LU-132. Site plans and proposed structures should be designed so as to fully integrate signage, building height, bulk, setbacks, landscaping, and parking considerations across the various components of each proposed development. Policy LU-133. Internal site circulation should be primarily pedestrian oriented. Policy LU-134. Vehicular access to each proposed development should be from a major street with the number of access points reasonably minimized Policy LU-135. A combination of internal and external site design features should be encouraged such as: a. public area plazas, b. prominent architectural features, c. significant natural features, 98_M_2.DOC\ d. distinctive focal features, e. gateways, f structured parking, and g. other features meeting the spirit and intent of these policies. 98_M_2.DOC\ 3 113th St At N e4,—.-- S 114th St iiS115thSt i,.. cP CO CO 00 et S'S 115th P1 4 4 CC) S 116th t U' Renton S 116th St a.)Municipal Airport co S 117th St 0 200 400 1 :2,400 U 7th U1 S 1 1 7th ill Figure 1 : Study Area ( 98—M- 2) Subject Area Boundary Area A Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning ED/N/SP Area proposed for prezone to ecrill) 0. Dennison, R. MacOnie 7j4 Heavy Ind. — No CPA required 12 March 1998 44 v fed v; eatt-t-04, r_....„ S,am. x 31 (1', Alw r. jj F n Reflton t 64 1 4 Air4 kv fl ark, I F f i ea'K" may r r Tiy 1"R . a+. L a. 4„,` .... Wag way i 1 1i 4 h mr Figure 2: Study Area (98—M-2) Proposed Prezone Boundary R Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning 0 150 300 4. J 0. Dennison 23 March 1998 1 : 1 8 00 6 R-6 R 1 2 Aii11111111b R-12 11111111, Isfia IN-101 1: -* 1 i R-6_, R-6 CB 1 R-18 R-1 8 R-6 CB illa ....................................... v...% ................. i B R-----6-- P-11? -6 i tl 1 E LI........................... 0 Renton 1111111 Municipal L_I w sz R-6 -1 -7---6 -R_,_6_ 1 R-1 2 C B\ -- j 0 200 400 1 1 :2,400 1 II 1 1 it co Figure 3:. Existing Zoning ( 98-M-2) CR. Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Existing Zone Boundaries ED/N/SP Subject Area—Land Use MapO. Dennison i. • 23 March 1998 Amendment o llitS113thSt SF Comm.Multi—Famil SF ( SF 18.6 du/ac Single Family Mobile Home Park MF S 114th St Mi lile Home Park MF Church MF Mobile Home Park Sea Plane Ram S 115th St a) Co1m. Corn . Retirement a) co MF Residence d Comm. S 115th P1 N C mm. Multi—Familycn 30.6 du/ac) Vac.Renton S 116th St Municipal Comm. Multi— Airport co Vac. Family 40.2 du c) A' liS117thSt 1 0 200 400 1 :2,400 S 117th P1 S 117th P1 Figure 4: Existing Land Uses (98—M-2 ) Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Proposed Center Office/Residential ED/N/SP Boundary 0. Dennison o 23 March 1998 QYlLINA1.I CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENT JN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST MAR :11 1998 Purpose of Checklist: RECEVE D The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as proposal," proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. City of Renton Environmt....... Checklist 4/1/98 Page 2 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 1998 Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment Non-project action: Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA) 98-M-2, RS to COR along Rainier Avenue,Adjacent to the Airport and Lake Washington—includes Prezone and new COR 3 Zone classification. 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Michael D. Kattermann,Director;Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning; (206) 277-6190; Staff Contact: Owen Dennison, (425)277-2475 Address: 200 Mill Avenue S.; Renton,WA 98055 4. Date checklist prepared: March 31, 1998 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton,Economic Development/Neighborhoods/Strategic Planning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): Planning Commission hearings to be held in April and May, 1998, and Council adoption in July, 1998. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. Concurrent assignment of City of Renton Center Office/Residential 3 (COR 3) and Heavy Industrial IH) Zones to the subject properties. The proposal will require adoption of an amendment to the Renton Municipal Code, establishing the COR 3 Zone. The prezone area is larger than the area proposed for the Comprehensive Plan amendment. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Draft EIS for the City of Renton Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, January, 1992. Final EIS for the City of Renton Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan,February, 1993. Supplemental EIS for the Comprehensive Plan,December, 1994. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Proposed CPA and prezone will require action by the City Council. CPASEPA.DOC City of Renton Environm‘......1 Checklist 4/1/98 Page 3 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal would amend the existing City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to from Residential Single Family to Center Office/Residential for the properties identified on Figure 1. Concurrently, the proposal will assign City of Renton Center Office/Residential 3 COR 3) and Heavy Industrial (IH) Zones, consistent with existing and proposed Comprehensive Plan land use designations, to the properties proposed for prezoning. (Figure 1) The prezone process for adopting a proposed zoning regulation is enabled and defined in RCW 35A.14.330 and .340. The proposal will also require the adoption of a proposed Zoning Code amendment to establish the COR 3 Zone. The COR 3 Zone is proposed only for application to the properties that are the subject of the Comprehensive Plan amendment. City of Renton zoning would not be implemented until all or portions of the area annex to the City. No annexation has been initiated. Associated and concurrent Code amendments would make the COR Zone subject to review under the site plan review provisions (RMC 4-31-33) and the Special Requirements section of the Sign Code (RMC 4-20-12C.10) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site includes those unincorporated parcels generally bounded by Land Washington, the Renton Municipal Airport, Rainier Avenue South and South 13th Street. See Figure 1. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site(circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, mountainous, other Flat to rolling. b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope?) Unknown. c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example, scaly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soils on the site classified as UR, Urban Land (USDA Soil Conservation Service, 1972). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. The City of Renton Critical Areas Inventory does not map the area for geological hazards. CPASEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmi Checklist 4/1/98 Page 4 e. Describe the purpose,type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Not applicable. This is a non-project action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. This is a non-project action and no new development is proposed as a consequence of this CPA. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. This is a non-project action. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not applicable. This is a non-project action. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. This is a non-project action. Redevelopment of all or portions of the site may result in emissions to air related to construction activities. New commercial or residential development made possible by the proposed action may result in additional automobile exhaust and other emissions related to commercial activities. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? Emissions from neighboring residences and automobile traffic. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Under the proposed Comprehensive Plan land use designation and zoning,new development would be restricted to those uses compatible with the adjacent residential development. If annexed,future development would be subject to SEPA review, where applicable, and Commute Trip Reduction regulations,where applicable. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year- round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes, ponds,wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. The site includes a shoreline of Lake Washington. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. Not applicable. This is a non-project action. CPASEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmc Checklist 4/1/98 Page 5 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. This is a non-project action. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. This is a non-project action. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The site does not lie within a 100-year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Not applicable. This is a non-project action. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. This is a non-project action. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. This is a non-project action. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters,If so, describe. Not applicable. This is a non-project action. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. This is a non-project action. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Not applicable. This is a non-project action. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: Unknown. The site is currently developed. CPASEPA.DOC City of Renton Environme....a. Checklist 4/1/98 Page 6 deciduous tree: alder,maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup,bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass,milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Not applicable. This is a non-project action. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants, or other measure to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any: Not applicable. This is a non-project action. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Unknown. Birds: hawk, heron,eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer,bear,elk,beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon,trout,herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain The entire State of Washington is included within a migration route for birds, known as the Pacific Flyway. This flyway, as it overlies Renton, is used by a variety of migratory birds, including,but not limited to,the Canadian Goose. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas,wood,wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc. Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. CPASEPA.DOC City of Renton Environme...,... Checklist 4/1/98 Page 7 The subject proposal is a non-project action. Development that occurs as a result of the implementation of the proposed land use and zoning designations may affect the potential use of adjacent properties. However,the proposed maximum height of 75 feet is less than the maximum height allowed under existing King County zoning. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the areas which may affect your project(for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None that would affect the proposed non-project action. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The subject proposal is a non-project action. Development that may occur as a result of the implementation of the proposed legislative actions may create construction noise impacts to adjacent residential uses. Post-construction, uses on the site may have noise impacts typically associated with commercial and office activities including,but not limited to,traffic. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: If annexed, future development could be subject to SEPA review, site plan review, Commute Trip Reduction and noise level regulations,where applicable. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Existing uses on the site include two mobile/manufactured home parks,multi-family residential, retirement residence and a seaplane ramp. Adjacent uses include multi-family, retail, religious and the Renton Municipal Airport. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. CPASEPA.DOC City of Renton Environm........ Checklist 4/1/98 Page 8 Unknown. c. Describe any structures on the site. Three multi-family structures, one retirement residence,two single family homes and a number of mobile and manufactured homes. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current zoning classifications of the site include R-48 and R-12(King County). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? City of Renton: Residential Single Family(RS) King County: Urban Residential 12 to 48 units per acre g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban(King County) h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The site is not mapped for any critical areas in the City's Critical Areas Inventory. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Proposed zoning is consistent with the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. CPASEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmc......1 Checklist 4/1/98 Page 9 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. The proposed maximum height would be 75 feet. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. Views north, south and west of the site could be altered or obstructed by development occurring as a result of the proposed Comprehensive Plan and zoning amendments. However, such development would result in no greater view impacts than may occur under existing King County zoning. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: If annexed, future development would be subject to environmental review and site plan review, where applicable. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. Any development in the vicinity of the airport may produce light or glare that poses a safety hazard to aviation. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Development that may occur as a result of the proposed non-project actions must be consistent with airport regulations on light and glare. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Portions of the site are located along Lake Washington. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The proposed non-project action will not displace any existing recreational uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: CPASEPA.DOC City of Renton EnvironmL.....J Checklist 4/1/98 Page 10 Development that occurs as a result of the proposed non-project actions must be consistent with Shoreline Master Program requirements for public access to shoreline areas. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. The West Hill Community Plan does not list any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state or local preservation registers on the site. A site referred to as "Sea Lark"is shown adjacent to the site across Rainier Avenue. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known except as noted in 13.a. above.. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are necessary. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. The site is served by Rainier Avenue S. (S.R. 167). b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is served by public transit within two blocks of the site. The distance to the closest transit stop is unknown. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe(indicate whether public or private? Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The project will occur in the immediate vicinity of air transportation. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. CPASEPA.DOC City of Renton Environm I Checklist 4/1/98 Page 11 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,police protection,health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity,natural gas,water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Unknown. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed:m_ ,> 1)e=w iv;sv ti Date Submitted: 3/1)j 1 9 K D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS: 98-M-10 This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies,plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented Respond briefly and in general terms. NOTE: The following responses on this Supplemental Sheet are tailored to City of Renton sponsored Land Use Map designation changes. Comprehensive Plan amendment 98-M-10 relates to this Land Use Map change. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposal would not directly result in changes to any of these areas since these are non-project actions. Development that may occur as a result of the proposed actions may result in increased CPASEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental Checklist 4/1/98 Page 12 emissions to air and increased production of noise from construction activities, additional traffic and impacts associated with office and commercial activities. Discharge to water may be increased as a result of increased impervious surfaces. Increased production, storage or release of toxic substances is not anticipated to result from the proposal. At the time new development does occur,whether in response to this amendment or existing land use policies,it will have to,unless exempt, comply with SEPA and its impacts disclosed. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Development under the City's jurisdiction would be subject to the Renton Municipal Code regulations including noise level, aquifer protection, land clearing and tree cutting, storm and surface water management,the Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals,fish, or marine life? The proposal would not directly result in changes to any of these areas since this is a non-project action. Development that may result from the proposed non-project actions may impact animals and plants in the shoreline habitat. Since the area is currently developed,no other habitat areas would be affected by the site-specific proposal. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals,fish, or marine life are: Development that may occur as a result of the proposed non-project actions must be consistent with the policies and regulations of the City's Shoreline Master Program. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposal would not directly result in changes to any of these areas since this is a non-project action. Development that may occur on the site as result of the proposed non-project actions will use energy and natural resources to some extent. However, it is anticipated that the potential intensity of development would not increase over that allowed under existing regulations. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Development that may occur under the City's jurisdiction may be subject to environmental review and the Uniform Energy Code. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The proposal would not directly result in changes to any of these areas since this is a non-project action. Development that occurs as a result of the proposed actions may use or affect the shoreline of Lake Washington, classified as a Shoreline of the State-wide Significance. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Development that may occur as a result of the implementation of the proposed legislative actions must be consistent with the requirements of the governing Shoreline Master Program. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposal would affect the range of land uses that may occur on the site,which includes regulated shoreline. Currently, Renton's adopted land use designation for the subject properties is Residential Single Family. At this location, potential zones for Residential Single Family include R-8 and CPASEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental Checklist 4/1/98 Page 13 Residential Manufactured Home Park(RMH). The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment would redesignate the site Center Office/Residential. A new COR 3 Zone would implement the proposed Center Office/Residential land use designation. The proposed COR 3 Zone would increase the range of allowed uses over the current potential R-8 and RMH Zones. The expanded range of uses would include commercial uses such as hotels and small scale retail and service uses, office uses and residential uses including multi-family and retirement residences. The proposed COR 3 Zone would make existing multi-family and retirement residence uses conforming. Existing mobile/manufactured home park uses would become legal non-conforming. Such status should have no effect on the continued operation of these uses. At such time as the area annexes to the City of Renton,proposed COR 3 Zoning would supplant existing R-48 and R-12 zoning. The differences between uses allowed under the R-48 and those uses proposed for the COR 3 are not significant. The R-48 allows multi-family, conference centers and small scale retail and service uses. Hotels are not currently allowed under the King County zoning. The R-12 parcel is currently developed with a multi-family use. Zoning must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The assignment of the propose COR 3 Zone to the subject area will be contingent upon adoption of the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The prezone includes a portion of a tax lot that is under the ownership of the City of Renton and comprises a portion of the Renton Municipal Airport. Heavy Industrial zoning is proposed for this parcel fragment to make it consistent with the airport use. The adopted land use designation for the entire parcel,both within and outside of the city limits, is Employment Area—Industrial, consistent with the proposed zoning. The portion of the tax lot included in the prezone proposal is partially submerged under Lake Washington and is currently used for a seaplane ramp. No change of use is anticipated for this property. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: On a site specific basis,new development would be reviewed for potential land use and shoreline impacts and mitigation measures applied consistent with the policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan and the regulations contained in the Renton Municipal Code. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed amendments to the Land Use and Zoning Maps and Zoning Code would not raise the intensity of land use significantly over that allowed under King County's jurisdiction. Therefore, demands on transportation and public services and utilities are not anticipated to increase significantly as a result of the proposed non-project actions. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Concurrency policies will help ensure that increased demands on transportation or public services and utilities are met in a timely manner for new development. Under the City's jurisdiction, future development would be subject to Commute Trip Reduction, Street Improvements Ordinance and environmental review,where applicable. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The subject non-project CPA is not in conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. In fact,the proposed CPA is intended to be in compliance with the CPASEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental Checklist 4/1/98 Page 14 State's Growth Management Act,the Shoreline Management Act, and the State Environmental Protection Act. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Qwcw 3. 0chi Sor i Date Submitted: 3/3)11i t CPASEPA.DOC likiii, 113th St N •••••••••• • • S 114th St III cn P.ro .:....COR: ... 111 115th St ro .. 4.-.) S 115th P1cf. 116th StMa Renton 00- Illi Municipal Airport•:_ _____________A Ili"S 1 17th St 0 200 400 ii...........-.... S 117th Pl 1 :2,400 Figure 1 : Subject Area (98 —M- 2) Proposed Prezone Boundary Area Proposed for CPA to CNeighborhoods & Strategic Planning Center Office/Residential 0. Dennison 23 March 199E PLANNING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: Application Fees City sponsored application Environmental Checklist Existing Covenan s(Recorded Copy) X + / City sponsored application. Existing Easemerts (Recorded Copy) X ,\AA y City sponsored application. i Justification for C 3A and/or CPA/Rezone X See issue paper. King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site X P Mailing labels list based upon Technical Services data base. Legal Description 1 o be provided prior to ERC review. List of Surrounding Property Owners Mailing Labels of property Owners Map of Existing Site Conditions X Refer to Figures 2 &4 of Issue Paper. Master Applicatio i Form Neighborhood De:ail Map X.,n,,v See Figures 1 &3 of Issue Paper. Plan Reductions PMT's);' Figure 1 provided at 8 1/2x11. Other reductions can be made prior to posting. Postage X City sponsored application. Project Narrative See issue paper Title Report or PI 3t Certificate X City sponsored application. Topography Map (5' contours) X\See Figure 2 (aerial) of Issue Paper. APPLICATION: 98-M-2 EVEL.OPIVMENT Pl_r.^ iNC DATE: j —qg CITY OF KLlr MAR '3 1 1998 RECEIVED H:\DIVISION.S\P-TS\P LANNING\AMENDS\1998\M2MTRAP.DOC\LG