HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA98-050i ur1 — ciq-05o
Road South and.north'aand'wesVof•I-405)
from IH (Industrial Heary)and C0;(Com-I CITY OF RENTON:- :e mercial Office)to CA(Commercial Arterial)
NOTICE OF ORDINANCE ADOPTED BY (Puget Westtern CPA 98 M 5`Flle No' LUA
RENTON CITY COUt JVA.)=- 98.033). • ,-AWa.:+U404.6 t4L.14•ak..,e r
Following is summary'of ordinances Effective:10/14/98 !r:Atii q0-?:1'1: '
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION f adopted by the Renton City Council on • Complete text'of these ordinances can
October 5, 1998: be read at Renton City Hall;City,ClerkORDINANCENO.4741 Division 7th''Floor,1055 So.Grady Way,x•• An ordinance of the City''of Renton, and at the Renton Public Library,=100 Mill
Lori L. Furnish first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the i`•
Washington, amending sections 5-1-2.D Avenue South. Upon request to the City
and 5-1-2.E and rescinding section 5-1-2.G Clerk's office (425-430-6510)'copies will
of Chapter 1, Fee Schedule, of Title V .also be mailed for a fee.
Finance± and Business Re ulations of--Marilyn J:Petersen---•a---- _--SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL rdinance No. 4260•entitled "Code yof., City lerk
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, _ Published in the South n Joumal600S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 Washington" relating to the supplements ` October9,1998.5261..;, i ry,x jfandsalepriceofthereorganizedTitleIV '
a dailynewspaper seventimes a week. Said newspaper is a le al Development Regulations.
published 7) g IF Effective: 11/8/98
newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months ^s • ORDINANCE NO.4742 \
prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language;: An ordinance of the City'of:Renton;'
the zoning,classifi-..
continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County cation of certain
ngton,
apgroperti s within the City
Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the j of Renton(one parcel consisting of 3.4 acr-
es with access from Rainier Avenue North)
State of Washington for King County. from RS(Residential Single Family).to CA
The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County Commercial'.Arterial) (Rainier-Avenue
Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers North CPA98 M-3;File No.LUA98 046).
during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a
Effective:lORDINANCE0/14/98 ,
NO.N0.4743
An ordinance of the City of Renton,
Ordinance Posted Washington changing the zoning classifica-
tion of certain properties within the City'of
Renton(five parcels consisting of 1.36 acr-
es bounded by Reton Avnue Extension,as published on: 10/9/98 Hayes Place,S.W.nRainierAvenue South,
S.W. Victoria Street and Hardie Avenue
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $120.67 S.W.)from CA(Commercial Arterial)to R-..,
Legal Number 5261
r— 10 (Residential 10 DU/AC) (Hardie/Hayes
g CPA 98-M-10;File No.LUA 981050):
Effective 10/14/98 4-4
ORDINANCE NO.4744
r
e An ordinance of the City of Renton;jiL. •Washington changing the zoning classifica-%
tion of certain properties within the City oftiLegalClerk, outh County Journal
Renton(two parcels consisting of 2.5 acres .
and .5 acres located at Cedar Avenue
South and S.E. 172nd Street) from R-101Subscribedandswornbeforemeonthisdayof _ e119 )Residential 10 DU/AC)to R-8(Residential]
8 DU/AC)(O'Conner Plat CPA-98-M-8;FilgrtNo.LUA 98-045).1^ Effective:10/14/98 I'.::';
t,l1ttt1. ,.--. 6)(_,.k..t..-0-U1-4Th I^ , -q ORDINANCE NO.474511 1 \\ l t: !
i, An ordinance of the City'of Renton,.}
@,•.•_••• Washington changing the zoning classifica-
tion of certain properties1NotaryPublicoftheStateofWashingtonwithinthe:City'of;
re'irfinn in Pe r-in Renton (one parcel consisting of 8 acres
iocd[eo . at 4aU Lake Washington.
King County, Washington Boulevard between N. 44th Street, I-405',
and Lake Washington Boulevard, North)
from IM (Industrial Medium)to COR Cen-t\v
ter Office Residential)(Pan Abode;File No...
LUA 95 049).
0,%. 0r.IJ H S\\`•`
Effective: 10/14/98
ORDINANCE NO.4746
4rrrttttlttt An ordinance of the City of Renton, .
I Washington changing the zoning classifica-
t Legal Clerk, S OUth County Journal Renton
pi certain properties within the City of ,
Renton(two parcels consisting of 2.5 acreS .
and ..5 acres located at Cedar Avenue
South,and S.E. 172nd Street) from R-10<j I Residenal10DU/AC)toR8(ResidentialhSubscribedandswornbeforemeonthis _1 ay of 1
DU/AC)(O'Connor Plat CPA-98-M-8;plc/No.LUA 98-045).
Effective:10/14/98' ` S',F'
tttt t i t l t tiff/ CULijefi--1—NORDINANCE N0.ty of`,‘- xx f 1. i,'''` VV.\An ordinance•of the City of Renton,
Washington changing the zoning classifica
NotaryPublic of the State of Washington lion of certain properties within the City of;`ti:^;g
Renton (one parcel consisting of 8 acres
Q, residing in Renton located ''at 4350 Lake Washington,
King County, Washington Boulevard between N. 44th Street, 1-405
and Lake Washington Boulevard, North) '
from IM(Industrial Medium)to COR(Cen-LV G_. ter Office Residential)(Pan Abode;File No.,.•
i. p..p: LUA 95 049).
2 3 ti.-•-V Effective: 10/14/98
0 it tltlSkt,
1
0`` An ordinanceAofCheOCity46 of Renton, .
Washington changing the zoning classifica-
tion of certain properties within the City of;.
Renton(two parcels consisting of 7.41 acr-
es& 5.24 acres located at N. 8th Street;,,t'
Park Avenue North'and Garden Avenue T
North)from I-H (Industrial Heavy)to C-O+i
Commercial Office) (Boeing Commercial,.
Airplane Group CPA 98-M-9; File No. LUA
98-041).'
Effective:10/14/98
ORDINANCE NO.4747 ,• ,
An ordinance of the City of Renton,
Washington changing the zoning classifica
tion of certain properties within the City of i
Renton(one parcel consisting of 20 acres
located south of Grady Way,east of Talbot
Vh'
t
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 4743
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING
THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN
THE CITY OF RENTON FROM CA (COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL) TO R-10
RESIDENTIAL 10 DU/AC) (HARDIE/HAYES CPA 98-M-10; FILE NO. LUA
98-050).
WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV
Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property
hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as CA(Commercial Arterial) and
WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification of said
property. This matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and
public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about June 10, 1998, and said
matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and said zoning request being in
conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended by Ordinance No. 4734, and the City
Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard
appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to R-
10 (Residential 10 DU/AC), as hereinbelow specified. The Neighborhood and Strategic Planning
Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended,
to evidence said rezoning, to-wit:
1
ORDINANCE NO. 4743
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein.
Five parcels consisting of 1.36 acres are bounded by Renton Avenue Extension, Hayes
Place, S.W., Rainier Avenue South, S.W. Victoria Street and Hardie Avenue, S.W.)
SECTION H. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days
after it. publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 5thday of October 1998.
Marilyn J. et r n, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 5thday of October 1998.
Je anner, Mayor
Approved as Arm:
Lawrence J. Warren, City torney
Date of Publication: 10/9/98 (Summary)
ORD.73 9:9/14/98:as.
2
EXHIBIT A 17(6
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
FOR PROPERTIES REVIEWED IN
98-M-10
Those portions of Lots 1 and 2, Block 30, Earlington Acre Tracts, according to the Plat thereof,
recorded in Volume 15, Page 84, Records of King County, Washington, and those portions of the
Northeast quarter and Northwest quarter, all in Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,
City of Renton, King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows:
That tract of land within the City of Renton bounded on the north by Renton Avenue Extension, on the
east by Hayes Place SW and Rainier Avenue South, on the south by SW Victoria St., and on the west
by Hardie Avenue SW.
EXCEPT that portion lying south and east of the following described line:
Commencing at the intersection of the northerly right-of-way line of SW Victoria St., said
right-of-way being 25 feet in width, and the easterly right-of-way line of Hardie Avenue SW,
said right-of-way being 60 feet in width;
Thence North 89° 47' 45" East along said northerly right-of-way line of SW Victoria St., a
distance of 81.68 feet,to the True Point of Beginning of the above referenced line;
Thence North 04°26' 15" West, a distance of 56.03 feet;
Thence North 53° 21' 15" West, a distance of 72.92 feet, to an intersection with the northerly
right-of-way line of vacated Renton Avenue, (County Road);
Thence northeasterly along said northerly right-of-way line of vacated Renton Avenue, to an
intersection with the westerly right-of-way line of Hayes Place SW and Rainier Avenue South
and the end of the hereinbefore described line.
TS_SERV ER\sys2\\COMMON\H:\DIV SION.S\UTILITIE.S\TECHNICA.SER\LEGALS\98040801.DOC\
t-
H. Property located on the Block bordered by Hardie, Hayes, Rainier Ave. Change from
Employment Area Commercial to Residential Options with concurrent rezoning to Residential 10
Dwelling Units per Acre (R-10) according to the following map.
cu
Mill V(if
cs MEW
NW 2nd Pl
3
z ME=
CD CD
Q Q
o
L.
Ci
H--
NW 2nd St 1
IP di
ois_______ o z
0,
1 0
sty victor' S ria
I -)
n,
Ave SW Q
L_
n)
Y
CS
SV end St
C
E• 1
iiit
4
i
s
z
S 2nd St
Amendment 98-M- 10 0 200' 400'
Q
Neighborhoods do Strategic Planning 1 :2,400
ED/
Sapp,
SP
T.c i1e l, R. MacOnte R land Use and R-10 Zoning
y Renton City Limits
October 5, 1998 Renton City Council Minutes Page 318
Resolution#3355 A resolution was read expressing support for the submission by King County of
Parks: Family Aquatic Center a levy proposal to the voters on November 3, 1998, to fund a family pool.
Bond Issue, Council Support MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL ADOPT
THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the
Council meeting of October 12, 1998 for second and final reading:
Police: Pawn Sho•p Hours of
An ordinance was read amending Section 6-7-26 of Chapter 17,Pawn Brokers,Operation
of Title VI,Police Regulations, of City Code,by regulating the hours of pawn
shop operation. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-
WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND
FINAL READING ON 10/12/98. CARRIED.
The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading:
Ordinance#4741 An ordinance was read amending Sections 5-1-2.D and 5-1-2.E and rescinding
Development Services: Title Section 5-1-2.G of Chapter 1,Fee Schedule, of Title V(Finance and Business
IV Fee Changes Regulations) of City Code relating to the supplements and sale price of the
reorganized Title IV Development Regulations. MOVED BY EDWARDS,
SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS
PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.
Ordinance#4742 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of one parcel
Rezone: Rainier Ave N, R-98- consisting of 3.4 acres with access from Rainier Ave. N. from Residential
046 Single Family (RS)to Commercial Arterial (CA); File No. R-98-046. MOVED
BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION
CARRIED.
Ordinance#4743 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of five parcels
Rezone: Hardie/Hayes Site, R- consisting of 1.36 acres bounded by the Renton Ave. extension, Hayes P1. SW,
98-050 Rainier Ave. S., SW Victoria St. and Hardie Ave. SW from Commercial
Arterial (CA)to Residential-10 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-10); File No. R-98-
050. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL
ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES.
MOTION CARRIED.
Ordinance#4744 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of two parcels
Rezone: O'Connor Plat, R-98- consisting of 2.5 acres and 0.5 acres located at Cedar Ave. S. and SE 172nd St.
045 from Residential-10 Dwelling Units per Acre(R-10) to Residential-Eight
Dwelling Units per Acre(R-8); File No. R-98-045. MOVED BY EDWARDS,
SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS
PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.
Ordinance#4745 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of one parcel
Rezone: Pan Abode Site,R- consisting of eight acres located at 4350 Lake Washington Blvd.between N.
98-049 44th St., I-405 and Lake Washington Blvd.N. from Medium Industrial (IM)to
Center Office/Residential (COR); File No. R-98-049. MOVED BY
EDWARDS, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION
CARRIED.
Ordinance#4746 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of two parcels
Rezone: Boeing Commercial consisting of 7.41 acres and 5.24 acres located at N. 8th St.,Park Ave.N. and
Airplane Group Site, R-98-041 Garden Ave. N. from Heavy Industrial (IH)to Commercial Office (CO); File
No. R-98-041. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER,
COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL:
ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.
September 26, 1998 Renton City Council Minutes Page 309
Rezone: Rainier Ave N An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of one parcel
Site, R-98-046 consisting of 3.4 acres with access from Rainier Ave. N. from Residential
Single Family (RS) to Commercial Arterial (CA); File No. •R-98-046.
MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL REFER •
THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 10/05/98.
CARRIED.
Rezone: Hardie/Hayes An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of five parcels
Site, R-98-050 consisting of 1.36 acres bounded by the Renton Ave. extension, Hayes Pl. SW,
Rainier Ave. S., SW Victoria St. and Hardie Ave. SW from Commercial
Arterial (CA) to Residential-10 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-10); File No. R-
98-050. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL
REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON
10/05/98. CARRIED.
Rezone: O'Connor Plat, An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of two parcels
R-98-045 consisting of 2.5 acres and 0.5 acres located at Cedar Ave. S. and SE 172nd St.
from Residential-10 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-10) to Residential-Eight
Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8); File No. R-98-045. MOVED BY EDWARDS,
SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR
SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 10/05/98. CARRIED.
Rezone: Pan Abode Site, An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of one parcel
R-98-049 consisting of eight acres located at 4350 Lake Washington Blvd. between N.
44th St., I-405 and Lake Washington Blvd. N. from Medium Industrial (IM) to
Center Office/Residential (COR); File No. R-98-049. MOVED BY
EDWARDS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL REFER THE
ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 10/05/98.
CARRIED.
Rezone: Boeing An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of two parcels
Commercial Airplane consisting of 7.41 acres and 5.24 acres located at N. 8th St., Park Ave. N. and
Group, R-98-041 Garden Ave. N. from Heavy Industrial (IH) to Commercial Office (CO); File
No. R-98-041. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY PARKER,
COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL
READING ON 10/05/98. CARRIED.
Rezone: Puget Western An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of one parcel
Site, R-98-033 consisting of 20 acres located south of Grady Way, east of Talbot Rd. S. and
north and west of I-405 from Heavy Industrial (IH) and Commercial Office
CO) to Commercial Arterial (CA); File No. R-98-033. MOVED BY
EDWARDS, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THE
ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 10/05/98.
CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS Noting that municipal-owned power utilities such as Seattle City Light enjoy
Finance: Municipal certain financial advantages which negatively affect customers of private
Electric Power Charges electric companies, Council President Edwards suggested that the City send a
letter to its Congessional delegation on this issue. MOVED BY EDWARDS,
SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE
FINANCE COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Citizen Comment: Councilman Corman explained that on September 14th, Council referred
Highlands Residents - correspondence it had received from numerous residents on Vashon PI. NE
Safety Concerns at and NE 8th St. requesting more signage and police patrols in their area to help
Vashon/NE 8th address safety concerns related to parking problems and speeding traffic.
Although this letter was referred to the Public Safety Committee, staff has
suggested that it would more appropriately be addressed in the Transportation
CITY OF.RENTON
CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION •
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE-BY MAILING ! .
On the 304 day of IApvt.L 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United
States, a sealed envelope containing
r"'k2C, dettvMI,nafit•ats
documents. This information was sent to:
Name Representing
Departrr ent of Ecology
Don Hurter WSDOT
KC Wastewater Treatment Division
Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries
David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources
Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities
Duwamish Indian Tribe
Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy
Signature of Sender) 'SDVcLVu, k • ge,aa e-
STATE OF WASHINGTON
SS
COUNTY OF KING
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that /d-2,,x, fit' e,signed this
instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for th uses and purposes
mentioned in the instrument.
yDated: 5/W g
7)1y,Ll-11-1/
Notary Publ' in and for the State o ashington
Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHFFF
My appointment exabea
Project Name: 1i-avctie I ttmyeS CPMI I Retttv c
Project Number:
1.-UPc Ate. 050, CPA
1 R, E f
NOTARY.DC:C
s.,
CITY ' F 'RENTON
a Planning/Building/Public Works DepartmentJesseTannerMayor
Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator
April 30, 1998
Washington State
Department of Ecology
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia,WA 98:,04-7703
Subject:Environmental Determinations
Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewedbytheEnvironmentalReviewCommittee (ERC) on April 28, 1993:
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
HARDIE/HAYES CPA/REZONE
LUA-98-050,CPA,R,ECF
This proposal amends the Comprehensive Plan land use map to change property from employment area commercial toresidentialoptions. Location: The site is bounded by Hayes Place SW on the east, Renton Ave South on the north,Hardie Ave SW on the west and SW Victoria St on the south.
Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, May 18, 1998. AnyaggrievedpersonfeelingthattheenvironmentaldeterminationoftheEnvironmentalReviewCommitteeisbasedonerroneousprocedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available atthetimeofthedeterminationmaysubmitwrittencomments.After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committeefindsthereisnotsufficientevidencetoamenditsoriginaldetermination,then there will be no further extension of the appealperiod. Any persor wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Writtencommentsmustbefiledwith: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division,200MillAvenueSouth, Renton,WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examinerduringthesame15daycommentperiod,then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request forreconsiderationanatheappellantwillbenotifiedthattheappealisonholdpendingtheCommittee's decision on theeconsiderationrequest. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the HearingExamineroftheEnvironmentalReviewCommittee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless theappellantnotifiestheHearingExaminerinwritingthathewishestowithdrawtheappeal. Appeals of the environmentalieterminationmugtbefiledinwritingonorbefore5:00 PM, May 18, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with theequired$75.00 apf lication fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals toheExamineraregovernedbyCityofRentonMunicipalCodeSection4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appealrocessmaybeobtainedfromtheRentonCityClerk's Office, (425)-235-2501.
f you have questions, please call me at(425)277-6181.
or the_...„,)EnvironmentpRev' Co mittee,
ii/A---.- cl
rO-nafd-Erickson
roject Manager
King County Wastewater Treatment Division
Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries
David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources
Don Hurter, Department of Transportation
Shirley Lukh3ng, Seattle Public Utilities
Duwamish Tribal Office
Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance)
Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy
ivc
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055
This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer
CIT OF RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works DepartmentJesseTanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator
April 30, 1998
TO: Parties of Record
SUBJECT: Hardie/Hayes CPA/Rezone
Project No. LUA-98-050,CPA,R,ECF
Dear Resident:
This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they havecompletedtheirreviewoftheenvironmentalimpactsoftheabove-referenced project. The Committee, on April 28,1998, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non-Significance.
The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment.An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by theERCundertheauthorityofSection4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklistandotherinformation, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, May 18,1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee isbasedonerroneousprocedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could notbereasonablyavailableatthetimeofthedeterminationmaysubmitwrittencomments. After review of the comments, ifEnvironmentalReviewCommitteefindsthereisnotsufficientevidencetoamenditsoriginaldetermination, then therewillbenofurtherextensionoftheappealperiod. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formalappealwithintheoriginal15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use ReviewSupervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal oftheenvironmentaldeterminationisalsofiledwiththeHearingExaminerduringthesame15-day comment period, thentheEnvironmentalReviewCommitteewillfirsttakeactionontherequestforreconsiderationandtheappellantwillbenotifiedthattheappealisonholdpendingtheCommittee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notifytheappellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the EnvironmentalReviewCommittee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies theHearingExaminerinwritingthathewishestowithdrawtheappeal. Appeals of the environmental determination mustbefiledinwritingonorbefore5:00 PM, May 18, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals totheExamineraregovernedbyCityofRentonMunicipalCodeSection4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding theappealprocessmaybeobtainedfromtheRentonCityClerk's Office, (425)-235-2501.
If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (206) 277-6181.
For the Environmental Review Co ittee,
jr
Donal nckson
Project Manager
DNSLTR.DOC
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055
This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION
E N A I EKristinaJ. Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of
al tryy H
RENTONLWASHINGTONMITTEE
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
The Environmental Review Committeethe
ERC)has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under
SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL the
Code.authority of the Renton Municipal
600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 HARDIE/HAYES CPA/REZONE
L UA-98-050,C PA,R,EC F
This proposal amends the Comprehen-
a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal sive Plan land use map to change propertyfromemploymentareacommercialtoresi-newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months dential options. Location: The site is
prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language bounded by Hayes Place SW on the east,
continuallyas a dailynewspaper in Kent, KingCount Washington. The South CountyRenton Ave South on the north, Hardie Avey9SWonthewestandSWVictoriaStcntheJournalhasbeenapprovedasalegalnewspaperbyorderoftheSuperiorCourtofthesouth.
State of Washington for King County. The 15 day •comment and appeal period
The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County
for this project will run concu andrrentlyendat5:00 PM on May 8, 1998
Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Following this, the City •will •finalize its
during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a
gure
Determination
reconsiderat onme ittenccom-s andshalltbeforwardedstoortheeconsiderationDeveDevelopmentHardie/Hayes CPA Rezone
Services Division Land Use ReviewSupervisor. Information on •the project file is
published on: 5/2/98as available at the Development Services
Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building,Renton,Washington 98055. Phone: 235-The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$43.88 2550. Appeal procedures are available in
Legal Number 4560 the City Clerk's office,First Floor,MunicipalBuilding.
Published in the South County JournalMay2, 1998.4560
Legal Clerk, South County Journal
Subscribed and sworn before me/this / i day of// /a-9 , 19
0 \\\)lull/L- % Vim'
t p E. N yy/
0, gS10....f, .G,# Notary Public of the State of Washington
cod' 9;`
l
residing in Renton
OTARr I: King County, Washington
4 G evAUBI\ pr
A.99 0.02`
y). ••CH1 0 ;ti'G'
1.•
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the
folic wing project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code.
HARDIE/HAYES CPA/REZONE
LUA-98-050,CPA,R,ECF
This proposal amends the Comprehensive Plan land use map to change property from
employment area commercial to residential options. Location: The site is bounded by
Hayes Place SW on the east, Renton Ave South on the north, Hardie Ave SW on the
west and SW Victoria St on the south.
The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 PM on May
18, 1998. Following this, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a
reccnsideration. Written comments and requests for reconsideration shall be forwarded to the
Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file is available
at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055.
Phole: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal
Building.
Publication Date: May 04, 1998
Acc punt No. 51067
dnspub
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-98-050,CPA,R,ECF
APPLICAN City of Renton/Economic Development, Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning
PROJECT tIAME: HARDIE/HAYES CPA/REZONE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This proposal has three options. Option one evaluates whether to continue the
current Employment Area - Commercial designation but restrict residential use
with either a conditional use or secondary use with specific criteria. Option two
considers designating the area or a portion of it from EAC to RO. Option three
considers redesignating the area RM-I. This latter option requires a change to
Policy LU-69.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Hayes Place SW; Victoria Avenue SW; Hardie Avenue SW; Renton Avenue
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton
Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
Development Planning Section
This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be
involved, th a lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days.
Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, May 18,
1998 (15 days from the date of publication). Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the
Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the
discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written
comments. After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to
amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take
further actio i would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed
with: Jana Iluerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue
South, Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner
during the same 15-day comment period, then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request
for reconsid ration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the
reconsideral ion request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and
the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be
continued uiiless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals
of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, May 18, 1998. Appeals must be
filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue
South, Rent)n, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B.
Additional irformation regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-
2501.
PUBLICATION DATE: May 04, 1998
DATE OF DECISION: April 28, 1998
SIGNATURES:
cil U/91
Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator DATE
Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
Sam Chastain Administrator DATE
Community icessDepa ent
0-7:e
Lee eeler, re Ch e DATE
Renton Fire Department
DNSSIG.DOC
NoTice
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
PROJECT NAME: HARDIE/HAYES CPA/REZONE
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-050,CPA,R,ECF
This proposal amends the Comprehensive Plan land use map to change property from employment area
commercial to residential options. Location:The site is bounded by Hayes Place SW on the east,Renton Ave
South on the north,Hardie Ave SW on the west and SW VIctoria St on the south.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED
THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM,May 18,
1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is
based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error In judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not
be reasonably available at the time of the deterninallen may submit written comments.After review of the comments,If
Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there
will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal
appeal within the original 15-day timelrame. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerler,Land Use Review
Supervisor,Clly of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. If an appeal of
the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period,then
the Environmental Review Committee will first lake action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be
notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify
the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental
Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the
Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal.Appeals of the environmental determination must
be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM,May 1a,1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required
375.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to
the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-0-11B. Additional information regarding the
appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-235-2501.
NV ndPi
MM.i
1 = g
NV 2nd t
111
rs
En
MalIII
fig11"Mitil o a•
Figure 1: Study Area (98—M-10)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)235.2550.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification.
CERTIFICATION
I, 1e IJLJ} '// hereb certify that copies of the above
docurnek were po ` :. by me in nspicuous places on or nearby
the described property on vim.
Signed:
ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in a or the State o
Washington residing on the `f't da of rl5P
MARILYN KAMCHEFF
COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99
14 0)
i-
TJCE
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
PROJECT NAME: HARDIE/HAYES CPA/REZONE
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-050,CPA,R,ECF
This propcsal amends the Comprehensive Plan land use map to change property from employment area
commercic I to residential options. Location: The site is bounded by Hayes Place SW on the east, Renton Ave
South on tl e north, Hardie Ave SW on the west and SW Victoria St on the south.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED
THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, May 18,
1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is
based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not
be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments, if
Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there
will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal
appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review
Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of
the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period, then
the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be
notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify
the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental
Review Committees final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the
Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must
be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, May 18, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required
75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to
the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-116. Additional information regarding the
appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-235-2501.
I
i
v
z R.,.NW 2nd Pl z
vaL.
orLNW2ndSt[ ~ '
Zerto1\
r 11111
SW Vict
Jl>l'
Q
Or* St MI o,
alit EMI
3 i _
m
SW and St NI
g'INN Idl 11go. m Nit- 0 " 0 .
1:• 400 oil- ®=
lialla_- S 2nd St
Figure 1: Study Area (98—M-10)
AillNeighborhood.k St,.tetle Planningco/Y ar Renton City Lir is
Y
a Ware t•.1
Y.cO.la
Parcels considered for redesignotio,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)235-2550.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
PI include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. I
STAFF City of Renton
REPORT Department of Economic Development/Neighborhoods/Strategic Planning
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
A. BACKGROUND
ERC MEETING DATE April 28, 1998
Project Name CPA 98-M-10: Hardie/Hayes Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone
Applicant City of Renton: Economic Development, Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning
File Number LUA-098-050, CPA, R, ECF Project Manager Don Erickson
Project Description This proposal has three options. Option one evaluates whether to continue the
current Employment Area - Commercial designation but restrict residential use with
either a conditional use or secondary use with specific criteria. Option two considers
designating the area or a portion of it from EAC to RO. Option three considers
redesignating the area RM-I. This latter option requires a change to Policy LU-69.
Project Location The site is bounded by Hayes Place SW on the east, Renton Ave South on the north,
Hardie Ave SW on the west and SW Victoria St on the south.
Exist. Bldg. Area gsf Not applicable. Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf Not applicable.
Site Area Approximately 1.77 acres. Total Building Area gsf Not applicable.
RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of
Non-Significance.
B. RECOMMENDATION
Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials
make the following Environmental Determination:
DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF
NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED.
Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period.Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period
with Concurrent 14 da A.seal Period.
X Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period
with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period.
C. MITIGATION MEASURES
1.None proposed.
Project Location Map ERC98M10.DOC
City.ofRenton ED/N/SP Department 1 7nmenta1 Review Committee Staff Report
CPA 98-M-10 LUA-098-050, CPA,R,ECF
REPORT AND DECISION OF April 28,1998 Page 2 of 3
Advisory Notes to Applicant:
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental
determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal
process for environmental determinations.
1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks.
D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only
those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and
environmental regulations.
Has the applicant adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in
conjunction with the proposed development?
No impacts were identified for this non-project action. However, a few of the key SEPA checklist elements have been
included for reference purposes only.
1.Earth, Air, and Water
Impacts: This non-project CPA would not directly result in impacts to any of these areas because no new
development is proposed. Future site specific developments allowed as a result of this policy amendment could
result in impacts. The impacts of individual projects would have to be determined on a site specific basis.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are proposed for this non-project action. At the time new development
does occur, it will have to comply with applicable regulations.
Nexus: Not applicable.
2.Land Use
Impacts: The proposed land use redesignation and concurrent rezone would lessen the intensity of development on
the site in question from what could develop under the current land use designation and zoning.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are proposed for this non-project action. At the time new development
does occur, it will have to comply with applicable regulations.
Nexus: Not applicable.
3.Transportation, Public Services, and Utilities
Impacts: This non-project CPA would not directly result in impacts to any of these areas because no new
development is proposed. Future development may increase demand for transportation, public services, and
utilities. The impacts of individual projects would have to be determined on a site specific basis.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are proposed for this non-project action. At the time new development
does occur, it will have to comply with applicable regulations.
Nexus: Not applicable.
E.COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS
ERC98M10.DOC
City of Renton ED/N/SP Department 1 onmental Review Committee Staff Report
CPA 98-M-10 LUA-098-050, CPA,R,ECF
REPORT AN,D DECISION OF April 28,1998 Page 3 of 3
The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where
applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or
Notes to Applicant.
X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File.
Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report.
The only substantive comments were from Police who indicated that there might be minimal impacts.
Environmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental
determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, May 18, 1998 (15 days from the date of
publication). Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review
Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence
which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review
of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original
determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action
would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana
Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South,
Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during
the same 15-day comment period, then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for
reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the
reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and
the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be
continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal.
Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in
writing on or before 5:00 PM, May 18, 1998.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of
Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton
Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the
Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501.
ERC98M10.DOC
Q., vj
L
Q
d
NW 2nd PI z
a a)
Q Q
S_Cu
o zs
L
d 0
NW 2nd St di
ol lmi
4#
s
k,(P O J'‘..._
Tyicori a St aria
of
Ave SW Q
I SW 32ndSt
c5— Milli
a)
i
fat ,I
00' 400' Ilit---9--j-
0 1idhi. 00
400 1 :2,410
S 2nd St
Figure 1 : Study Area ( 98 — M - 1O )
oti • Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
T 'Rentonam' CityLimits
T.. Schlepp,pp, R. MacOnie
o' 30 March 1998 11" Parcels considered for redesignation
City u, rvinton Department of Planning/Building/Pi_.._ Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: poke COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 20, 1998
APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-050,ECF,R,CPA DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 7, 1998
APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: DONALD ERICKSON
PROJECT TITLE: Hardie/Hayes CPA/Rezone WORK ORDER NO: 78362
LOCATION: Hayes Place SW; Victoria Avenue SW; Hardie Avenue SW; Renton Avenue
SITE AREA: 1.78 acres approx. BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A
SUMMARY 07: PROPOSAL: This Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)would change the land use designation for the northern
3/4 of the block founded by Hayes Place on the east, Renton Avenue on the north, Hardie Avenue on the west to RM-I.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Snoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/
Historic./Cultural
Natural Resoun•es Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
r
r7ikru MO tLn t o I ) 12OLLC t,i Ci? L Lt r- 6u14_.
W) 1 I {s res Ca( whbri AL proper awdoped -
B. POLIC"-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas
where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
eli&I--,0739'L(
tive Date "
t-70
Signature of Direthorized Representative
DEVAPP.DOC
Rev.10/93
City or Renton Department of Planning/Building/. _is Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p S COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 20, 1998
APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-050,ECF,R,CPA DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 7, 1998
APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: DONALD ERICKSON
PROJECT TIT._E: Hardie/Hayes CPA/Rezone WORK ORDER NO: 78362
LOCATION: Hayes Place SW; Victoria Avenue SW; Hardie Avenue SW; Renton Avenue
SITE AREA: 1.78 acres approx. I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: This Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)would change the land use designation for the northern
3/4 of the bloc<founded by Hayes Place on the east, Renton Avenue on the north, Hardie Avenue on the west to RM-I.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline L'se
Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Haalth Public Services
Energy/Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
fi6 dr)M-d) 172/1-Y,
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
1/(/?,(__ a/a 0 a/N .
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
c,71-11-L a/z,-e_ r2--( 1/P/7/0av 7)
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas
where additional information is needed,to property assess this proposal.
Sig hatu Dir or or Autho' R esentativ Dat
DEVAPP.DOC
Rev.10/93
City—. •.enton Department of Planning/Building/F_ .. Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: CoimrtVuc m Se CC COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 20, 1998
APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-050,ECF,R,CPA DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 7, 1998
APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: DONALD ERICKSON
PROJECT Tr LE: Hardie/Hayes CPA/Rezone WORK ORDER NO: 78362 f rY OF RENTO,N
LOCATION: Hayes Place SW; Victoria Avenue SW; Hardie Avenue SW; Renton Avenue
SITE AREA: 1.78 acres approx. I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A 1998
SUMMARY CF PROPOSAL: This Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)would change the land use'Ilet9gnation foUroporherrn
3/4 of the block founded by Hayes Place on the east, Renton Avenue on the north, Hardie Avenue on the west to RM-I.
A. ENVIRC'NMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/Historic/Cultural
Natural Resoun es Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
1?,"
14,,i, u,,c
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
1-14,1—t,._44-
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas
where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Signatu of Director or horized Representative Date
DEVAPP.DOC Rev 10/93
City or rcenton Department of Planning/Building/Po,,,,, Works RENTON FIRE D
rs iENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION RrgVit'W('Sl0 T
p ® 819REVIEWINGCEPARTMENT: Yt„ p'fi COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 20, 1998 99
APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-050,ECF,R,CPA DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 7, 1998 1 y j
APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: DONALD ERICKSON
1 }
PROJECT TITLE: Hardie/Hayes CPA/Rezone WORK ORDER NO: 78362
LOCATION: Hayes Place SW; Victoria Avenue SW; Hardie Avenue SW; Renton Avenue
SITE AREA: '.78 acres approx. I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: This Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)would change the land use designation for the northern
3/4 of the block founded by Hayes Place on the east, Renton Avenue on the north, Hardie Avenue on the west to RM-I.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Alr
Aesthetics
Water jght/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental health Public Services
Energy/
Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources
Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
0
B. RELATED COMMENTS
d1
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
4A '
V
We have reviewed this application ith particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas
where addition 'l information is n ed to properly assess this
proposalA4,460
Q' g J'
Signature Director or Authorized R resentative Date
DEVAPP. C
Rev 10/93
City or Kenton Department of Planning/Building/Puuoc Works
ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p\z,v.Re4icto _3Q)(- COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 20, 1998
APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-050,ECF,R,CPA DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 7, 1998
APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: DONALD ERICKSON
PROJECT TITLE: Hardie/Hayes CPA/Rezone WORK ORDER NO: 78362 r'in'Or
f.<.RN1Ot+r
LOCATION: Hayes Place SW; Victoria Avenue SW; Hardie Avenue SW; Renton Avenue w
SITE AREA: '.78 acres approx. I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A R 0 A ,8
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: This Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA)would change the land usa_dgligpation for the northern
3/4 of the block founded by Hayes Place on the east, Renton Avenue on the north, Hardie Avenue on the westtb fRAtirli.,,
I°rio!U N
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air
Aesthetics
Water LIghVGlare
Plants
Recreation
LandrShoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental health Public Services
Energy/HistoriciCultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
aeII=MY.
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
NO c0wlWit 14-2
We have wed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas
where additional inforrna ion is needed' to properly assess this proposal.
ik)e
ed
l
l /07
Signature of Director o Authorized Representative Date
DEVAPP.DOC
Rev 10193
City o, ,' inton Department of Planning/Building/Pt.... Norks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:s, , ., are wisitutya - COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 20, 1998
APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-050,ECF,R,CPA DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 7, 1998
APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: DONALD ERICKSON
PROJECT TITLE: Hardie/Hayes CPA/Rezone WORK ORDER NO: 78362 CITY nF RENTC"
LOCATION: Hayes Place SW; Victoria Avenue SW; Hardie Avenue SW; Renton Avenue
SITE AREA: '1.78 acres approx. l BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A APR 0 7 1993
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: This Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)would change the land use designation for the northern
3/4 of the block founded by Hayes Place on the east, Renton Avenue on the north, Hardie Avenue on the west to RM-L: ._ ,
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air
Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental h'ealth Public Services
Energy/Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
V 0 COtMIMe a •
We have wed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas
where addition al information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
LI Al if g Ale;" (44
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
DEVAPP.DOC
Rev.10/93
City of nenton Department of Planning/Building/Pi Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:—jAa-k-vro COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 20, 1998
4.M1 OF RENTOIN
APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-050,ECF,R,CPA DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 7, 1998
APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: DONALD ERICKSON
PROJECT TI1LE: Hardie/Hayes CPA/Rezone WORK ORDER NO: 78362
1 i iaib
LOCATION: Hayes Place SW; Victoria Avenue SW; Hardie Avenue SW; Renton Avenue
1,,,, L ..avlY I,v LSdON
SITE AREA: 1.78 acres approx. i BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: This Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)would change the land use designation for the northern
3/4 of the block founded by Hayes Place on the east, Renton Avenue on the north, Hardie Avenue on the west to RM-I.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water LighVGlare
Plants
Recreation
Land/Shoreline,Ise Utilities
Animals
Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLIC`r-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
Jo cowtwie q•
We have wed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas
where additioralJinformation is needed to properly assess this proposal.
iGe L1/447
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
DEVAPP.DOC
Rev 10/93
CITY OF RENTON
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
within 300 feet of subject site
PROJECT NAME: Block at Hardie, Hayes and Rainier Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Rezone
98-M-10)
APPLICATION NO: LUR•98. 050) R, CPfl I EC-f
Name Address Assessor's Parcel Number
Refer to Attached List.
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
MAR 31 1998
RECEIVED
M1OMLAF.DOC\
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
MAR 31 1998
RECEIVED
Applicant Certification
hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property
owners Print Name) and their addresses were obtained from:
City of Renton Technical Services Records
Title Company Records
King County Assessors Records
Si ed t Date *d ,nT
Applicant)
Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS
COUNTY OF KING
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that
signed this
instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary
act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Notary
Print)
My appointment
expires:
Dated:
M10MLAF.DOC1
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
MAR 31 1998
RECEIVED
t t. F''U;IXt:; .;::;is ': ':i.•.. .... yy ii::t{'tx;i:x}{x-'i:: 'ktitii}Y`Y::}':t}::•:.v ZS YR .: :x .: .:: 7k' x•.xxL+itxktii:xi?:xiL::Y:<i23:t:G.xiiiita:iv:'A`xtx2x2YYYtix'LYY2Y2?kxx{:xv..t::: .::tt:}:?2:x:x;:xY:Y{`.Y4:YY?x.:::
t;;; :` :. Ytkkkkkkkk2k22k22kkk{k2kiikk:?Yk'{:} ti?ik•{;kykY':'`{•?{}:
222YYYYY{- ..,. .. :..::::: .:: „. ..,.....::.... -...".
itektioNxilym,AILING . - •:. .-":---. -:. :.:.
K:tilkir, :,iiliztplii
xxx2YYYY`Y,,,Y}}xx c:2..,.....xxM1i}]
Y{iist}Y22}`Y't::•::ixh}.::x`?t?•.
C.t::.;'.{: :'tx't{:.tx:tt::Y,,:}};.};:}•::::::......:::.:iYxx:x:xxY::"• x>'{:::x:xi:xt txc#txtt.i:Y Y::}Yttixt2t,t{,{,•.Y•.,};::x::.....:: ::
t 'E f ie].:`}:2Ii thi -:E f€ f . .. 'S t:
K ..... tit:a,ax,,.tt..::::: ::t,:,t:t.t:.:•::;:;•:?.:}?•}::
K:n}:{
t;•:;:.,.:::k?i....
r. 'aI r l to• c -:li d grope *wn r or :]-: }:•10:,`
ii: '.•ni ii`xiiii:i;iii::i::: Y:xxY>x•ii`Y••"i:
i....... •wY•:}ii:iii.:.. tk2i: :: :::::itxl,t:::: ::::::':
8::':':::::::•:%i}}}i22:{i:Y.y..:..:.:...
i }:• . .. Yx:xiiiii i`k
iixf:iyi:::
A.gi
cxx`Yx}
eA:::•:•.•::•:::•..::':::.:.tart.:,:.:,•.:•.. i..•: ::{ia.a. :.... .....'::ikx.x.:.`":22}2`?i::•}:..;}}:...}:ri:x•`.:iii'£: .....:.;...;;..t.::..:..}•.t ;•:..:;.}.:.::.:;:.}•.}.... k:xxxxii:::}.:,.}::xx{{;?iix•:::<::::•::.}:.. .. . .. .....
iixiii•`.xiix},•.r•.::::. . ' .:t:':•,:•.:•:
i,^•.,•.^•..
J:i,:+:£2i:;v':}`;txY":2.it.;tv..: 1r
n... . r,. ........ :::.n:..::.:. :•.:::.:w:....::::•:t0:}:•:S}:•:i::::?{:'a{{:v.?{•:;:::iii: `Yt,i '`'+'^' t}
a.•:::;.r•• • S:ii{xxixxixxxY•`.Yx:•.::::•.ii:::i?x:•`.•`.:;:x::2:5:•`.tic2•t.£•t.:i•..t•::.t•.t•.:•.:•.Y:.::•.:•.:.. :•.ixY
4•...::;.y:.t}:}:c`:.2.`.y2..x ,}:::}::}:;.t:•.: y,}•.r}:::,rr::,r'•:,:'•:t}:;:,:.:
t:.ttt•. E.xxYxiixixxx:}i<aiYti'<ii?::2:ati::Y§2Y:5•`.25YkkkYYYYYYYx22tkiYa>.i :.•.t•.t:::::Y r,Y.t.::. .: .:r.:.t:: :.r.t:.::,,:::r:.::::..:....
ttt •:::::::..
k\:•:.-..:::;;•- ..
t•.::.::::,::::::•.:::::•:.::::::-
1::.•.,•.•.:•.i i:x \::: :::::•.::::•:•:::: ...
i.. ...:•
t•:::•: :•::,•.:. Y•..:
Ksx•::::::::::::•:::::•:::.
F..:•:::-.•..:...... .•.
i:iiixi+:i}tY,}:}}},}.:'c'cf:i't::?h:'tiix2:Y'{Y2:'cYY'ti'tk'tkY;YY';YY2Y22xYcYY'tYtiYYYiii•Y:i}2x22x22 :::::::::a:k::t:t:: :a::::a:a:at'.Y}}}}kk•:. .,iiii`.•`22xxYYYYiiiii'c;RkxYYY`Yii}'?xxYY2Y`Yirk.:.:a, ....
t'fix`xxx2xY}t`xtx.:,:,.4YYYY::::YYYxi•`.....xxtxxx Y: ti ::;....2ii:`;'x•o...... i.:i......:Y;:::.•'4 .22•.xtt:i,.aa:{:xa:aaa:aaaa :a•:.vvv.:•.xa::aa`:ii::^•t.:.:::,.'tYY`::r. :.:v::w::.:•.vv.::v.:.:v.:... ..
r,•..,w:.:•.vv.:aaw:.ay.avvv.v::::.v.a,a:::,::::::v. •.::vv::vv.,:v.:r:rr:rw:.,
n•};}•::}•}:}}::.v.vvv..aaaaaa:::a•.v nv::::.w.:vv.vv::.v:a ;.;
aa:a:aaaaavv at•aa•:v,• vv..:...v aa::::.
4 aataa:`:`t
a:
v..v.....:.:....
4,;.y::;..;x:........:}•:•}::-I, •..;;...t•.}::::::::ixxxp:vttt{
t{::};:Y•`i•`.;`.is x•::;``.":2}i;`isi '...-Y`£:;...::::::'::::':..
N u be trice':;.:::';`. ',::: ''i"#` t om '` ...ink,
rectify .1 wt or etaesa y e. i.derice that
tid ir7eir'free:i. ....
t:.....:.:.....i:{YxY•;Yt•i:::::iY•:. i<ix::xx xx<::<>.::>?.;: :: :}>.:
e Stare o .:N a hi• . . rh
ii: : :::::::::::::.•tar:
kx x:.•:.,:•..2•;.;..;};.;;•:,.•::::.....:..:.:. 52kkkkti2,tiki{kkj}itti{;:;ik-:i }ii:k:ii;:;iri t: x2;x ::.:.......
itt :•.:::,::
t••}:•}::•::.:•.:•.t::•:....:
i}}:i{:.tY:::::.....r....:•:t:::::.;...:>.. xx,}}}} }:}}t}}}}},„ra ; .....
y:.:,.,.,.,...,.,.}}.
t}}t:,:aa:a::
r..?.:{:::, .:::::.:'.t.,:.,:.:t,rt:t::.{.,,,.r}}?:;.k2,x`:Y`}.ts C..... :'{i{:i: <}:.:•'...•
x{:;ttti>. rrr:t.........:::•}:•:?.}•}:•}:•::...:.:.......•
3...... .
W:i.:. :•::.,:•.::„ X. •?i•}::iii}tt.tttt: ..
t, ,t:
i+::. ;.,i:::::: 4..y44..4..• .. x.... ......:.:'.`.::,. '':`:;:.._:::HF::iif'i i.r•i 'i a':.....
iitixi`..iiii"..`i{4,iC t•i..
M1OMLAF.DOC\
9- /77-/0
380600010504 182305908200 182305901106
AAA VICTORY TV ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY BRANDT PATRICIA J+BUNKER NA
81 S TOBIN ST C/O P&T TAX DEPT#05238-11 1814 WHITMAN NE CT
RENTON WA 98055 PO BOX 2485 RENTON WA 98059
LOS ANGELES CA 90051
214480086708 182305912509 182305912400
CITY OF RENTON COX RONALD DOLAN LARRY
200 MILL AVE S C/O HAROLDS AUTO REBUILD 13525 181ST AVE S
RENTON WA 98055 124 RAINIER AVE S RENTON WA 98059
RENTON WA 98055
182305912004 182305900900 182305901205
GARBARINO ADOLPH GIRL JAMES S+VINDO V GOBEN WILLIAM T+BOGES,CAROL
176 HARDIE AVE SW 4611 S COOPER 180 HARDIE AVE SW
RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98118 RENTON WA 98055
380600011007 380600001503 182305901700
GRAY MARY GUDMUNDSON DARRELD J HEALTH CARE PROP/INVESTORS
25711 SE 208TH ST 7963 139TH AVE SE 10990 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1200
MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 RENTON WA 98056 LOS ANGELES CA 90024
182305909208 214480085502 214480086500
IVANOVICH FRANK&JUDITH KING OF GLORY MINISTRIES KNOKE DANIEL
4839 S 170TH 221 HARDIE AVE NW BLACKLER-KNOKE CAROLYN
SEATTLE WA 98188 RENTON WA 98055 PO BOX 1804
STANWOOD WA 98292
182305907707 182305916302 182305912202
KWAI SHUNG H SUE LAZOR MIKE J LEYVA ERLANDO S ET AL
WESTWIND MOTEL 32 SW VICTORIA ST 17108 NE 35TH ST
7517 SE 71ST RENTON WA 98055 BELLEVUE WA 98008
MERCER ISLAND WA 98040
214480087508 182305922706 420440035509
MALLA JERRY+VICTORIA MCDONALDS CORP 046/0017 MINKLER ENTERPRISES
13264 RENTON AVE S PO BOX 66207 1701 KENNEWICK AVE NE
RENTON WA 98055 AMF OHARE RENTON WA 98055
CHICAGO IL 60666
214480086807 214480087607 182305901809
MOORE JOHN E ROSA RAYMOND ROSEMONT+ASSOCIATES
13249 91ST AVE S 307 S 19TH 1000 2ND AVE STE 3950
RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98104
182305910206 214480086302 182305913101
SEAQUIST JOHN H STAFFORD JERRY L TOSCO MARKETING CO
111 SW VICTORIA 18718 NORTHEAST 161ST PLACE PROPERTY TAX DEPT-DC17
RENTON WA 98055 WOODINVILLE WA 98072 PO BOX 52085
PHOENIX AZ 85072
182305911105 182305910107 182305908002
VALADE JERRY L&CLODAGH WALTERS SCOTT W+CRYSTAL M WILSON GLADYS W
94 HARDIE AVE S W 98 HARDE AVE SW 1414 MONROE AVE NE #106
RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98056
722950006303 182305916203 214480085601
WILSON PETER H WOODHOUSE GORDON+PATRICIA WOODMANSEE W KEITH
24333 35TH AVE S 18519 SE 60TH ST 8220 42ND NE
KENT WA 98023 ISSAQUAH WA 98027 SEATTLE WA 98115
Vl 021
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: APRIL 13,1998
A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. ThefollowingbrieflydescribestheapplicationandthenecessaryPublicApprovals.
PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA48-050,ECF,R,CPA/HARDIE/HAYES CPA/REZONE
DESCRIPTION: This Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)would change the land use
designation for the northern 3/4 of the block founded by Hayes Place on the east,Renton Avenue on the north,HardieAvenueonthewesttoRM•I.
GENERAL LOCATION: Hayes Place SW;Victoria Avenue SW;Hardie Avenue SW;Renton Avenue
STUDIES REQUIRED/OR
AVAILABLE:
PUBUC APPROVALS: Environmental Review(ECF)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)
Rezone(R)
Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr.Donald Erickson,Project Manager,Development
Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5.00 PM on Man 15.1998. If you have questionsaboutthisproposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Mr.Erickson
at(425)277-6181. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will benotifiedofanydecisiononthisproject.
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENI IFICATION
DATE OF APPLICATION: March 31,1998
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: April 13,1998
DATE OF NOTICE OF AP'PPLICIAATION: April 13,1998
NV 2M%
Milt 1
NV2nd$t
III: €
E[
sr,,,-1Q. 1
Bit1111/
111110, 1• -0 I0.
s 2nd St
GENI/ALOr000 Figure 1: Study Area (98—M-10)
CERTIFICATION
I, I"e J /7/Q copies of the aboveherebycertifythat
documerA were Pos'dl by me in ' co spicuous places on or nearby
the described property on
Signed:
ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in for the State o
Washington residingc on the 15 - day of q!ell
177/\(t}„.:€/, e/tts2--6-6—
MARILYN KAMCHEFF
COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99
A
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: APRIL 13, 1998
A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The
following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals.
PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-98-050,ECF,R,CPA / HARDIE/HAYES CPA/REZONE
DESCRIPTION:This Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) would change the land use
designation for the northern 3/4 of the block founded by Hayes Place on the east, Renton Avenue on the north, Hardie
Avenue on the west to RM-I.
GENERAL LOCATION:Hayes Place SW;Victoria Avenue SW;Hardie Avenue SW;Renton Avenue
STUDIES REQUIRED/OR
AVAILABLE:
PUBLIC APPROVALS:Environmental Review(ECF)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)
Rezone(R)
Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr.Donald Erickson,Project Manager, Development
Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on May 15, 1998. If you have questions
about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Mr. Erickson
at (425) 277-6181. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be
notified of any decision on this project.
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF APPLICATION: March 31, 1998
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: April 13, 1998
DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION:April 13,1998
o,
E
a.IA
1!
NW 2nd Pl
1,_....„.....,_____
1._=_.
I pr'
NW 2nd Stl ~ L
Pi LiQl
Z1111111
jWVictoriat%a 1111111 to
as
Ave SW
L Emu
SW2n ti
i MINI
i 40' 400' ..a 0 '' '
0a400 _ mama -'
S End St
GENMALOT.DOC
Figure 1: Study Area (98—M-10)
t!
p`
Neighborhood.&Strategic PlanningVittfnpv, Y.,„, Renton City Units
CITY OF RENTO `
YELr(PME„„ SCR VICES DIT SI N
RA•P I A 'ION
OWNERS PROJECT INFORM TION( o t)
Note. If thcre is more than on legal owner please attach an additional notarized
EXISTING LAND USE(S):Master applicat*anta each owner.
Residential and some commercial.
NAME: City sponsored
ADDRESS:
PROPOSED LAND USE(S):
City:ZIP:
N/A
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
CONTACT PERSON/APPLICANT : Employment Area-Commercial (EA-C)
NAME: Rebecca Lind/Don Erickson PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
Residential Options (RO)
ADDRESS:200 Mill Ave. S.
EXISTING ZONING:
City: Renton ZIP: 98055 Arterial Commercial(CA)
PROPOSED ZONING:
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 277-6188/277-6181
R-10
PROJECT IN O ATION' SITE AREA(SQ.FT.OR ACREAGE):
PROJECT OR I)EVELOPMENT NAME: Approximately 1.78 acres
PROJECT VALUE:
Block at Hardie,Hayes &Rainier Comprehensive Plan
N/A
Amendment/Rezone(98-M-10)
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA?
PROPERTY/PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION:
No
Block bounded by Hayes Place SW on the east,Renton
Avenue South on the north,Hardie Avenue SW on the west IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF
and SW Victoria Street on the south. ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA?
No. Site does not appear on wetland inventory or Greenbelt Map.
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER:
2144800856, 1823059111, 1823059101, 1823059009,
1823059162, 1823059092, 1823059163
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
MAR 31 1998
RECEIVED
H:\DIVISION.S\P-TS\PLANNING\AMENDS\1998\M10MTRAP.DOC\LG
LEGAL DFSCRLA L iON OF PROPERTY(Attach sepal ate sheet if needed)I
To be provided prior to ERC. See waiver.
OF APPLICATION& FEES
Check all application types that apply--City staff will determine fees.
ANNEXATION SUBDIVISION
X COMP.PLAN AMENDMENT $ N/A
X REZONE N/A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
SPECIAL PERMIT SHORT PLAT
TEMPORARY PERMIT TENTATIVE PLAT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PRELIMINARY PLAT
SITE PLAN APPROVAL FINAL PLAT
GRADE&FILL PERMIT
No. Cu. Yds:
VARIANCE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT $
from Section: PRELIMINARY
WAIVER FINAL
ROUTINE VEGETATION
MANAGEMENT PERMIT
BINDING SITE PLAN MOBILE HOME PARKS
SHORELINE REVIEWS:
SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $
CONDITIONAL USE
VARIANCE X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ N/A
EXEMPTION NO CHARGE
REVISION
I,(Print Name) /la'lI L. 1 * J' Tv declare that I am(please check one) _the owner of the property involved in this
application,the authorized representative to act for the perty owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein
contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this
instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes
mentioned in the instrument.
DEVELOPMENT PL•"v''NG
1 ,;••, o• CITY F RENTQN
Name o 0 /Rep . ve Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
MAR 31 1998
Notary(Print)
Signature of Owner/Representative) My appointment expires: RECEIVED
a! IS SECTION OBE COMPLETED BY CITY STAFF).
City File Number tI CF SA SII PL CU` LLA PP FP TP s <RVMP V
v r • W• FPVA SM SME MICR BSP A CP
TOTAL FEES $_„ TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED S
H:\DI VI S ION.S\P-TS\PLANNING\AMENDS\1998\M 1 OMTRAP.DOC\LG
AMENDMENT 98-M-10 - BLOCK AT HARDIE, HAYES, & RAINIER
PROPOSAL SUMMARY
This amendment would change the current land use map designation for the whole or a portion of the
block bounded by Hayes Place SW on the east, Renton Avenue South on the north, Hardie Avenue SW
on the west and SW Victoria Street on the south. The block is currently designated Employment Area -
Commercial which allows multi-family development at 20 du/ac. The majority of the block sets up on a
plateau that rises steeply west of Hayes Place SW separating it from the commercial uses off of Rainier
Avenue South to the east. The property in this block is currently subject to a moratorium on multi-
family residential development. The City is evaluating whether to continue allowing new multi-family
development in this designation. If multi-family uses are removed from the zone a redesignation of
these properties to another zone may be appropriate. Consideration is being given to either designating
the block or a portion of it Residential Options or Residential Multi-Family Infill.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN"v'NG
CITY OF RENTON
MAR 31 1998
RECEIVED
M 1 OPRPSM.DOC\
CD
ay v...,
c,...,i I
CL
3
NW 2nd Pt
Q Q
L.QJ 1
0
d CS
NW 2 n d-- St
p .0\
Pie
45\z• %
e
Cu
SW V'Ctor,
Q
ICI St lb oriaILI. a)
v'
Ave SW il a
S csV2n0rS
c:
15 :I 00' 400' at....__
V
1 :!:::,400 1 :2,410
S 2nd St
Figure 1 : Study Area ( 98 — M - 1O )
0 Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
ED/N/SP
no envoi Renton yCity LimitsT. Sc lepp, R. Maconie
zo 3o March 1998 Parcels considered for redesignation
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
AMENDMENT 98-M-10 - BLOCK AT HARDIE, HAYES, & RAlNrat
1 1998
RECEIVED
DESCRIPTION:
This amendment would change the current land use map designation for the whole or a portion of the
block bounded by Hayes Place SW on the east, Renton Avenue South on the north, Hardie Avenue SW
on the west and SW Victoria Street on the south. The block is currently designated Employment Area-
Commercial which allows multi-family development at 20 du/ac. The majority of the block sets up on a
plateau that rises steeply west of Hayes Place SW separating it from the commercial uses off of Rainier
Avenue South to the east. The property in this block is currently subject to a moratorium on multi-
family residential development. The City is evaluating whether to continue allowing new multi-family
development in this designation. If multi-family uses are removed from the zone a redesignation of
these properties to another zone may be appropriate. Consideration is being given to either designating
the block or a portion of it Residential Options or Residential Multi-Family Infill.
ISSUE SUMMARY:
1. Is property in this block appropriate for commercial development?
2. Should the Employment Area - Commercial land use designation for this site be changed to
Residential Options or Residential Multi-family Infill in light of the fact that the block is physically
detached from the commercial areas along Rainier Avenue South to the east and unlikely to develop
with viable strip commercial uses in the future because of its relative isolation?
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY:
If residential uses are eliminated from the Employment Area-Commercial designation:
1. That Option 2 be pursued, redesignating the northern portion of the block (0.81 acres) between
Renton Avenue South on the north, SW Victoria Street on the south, Hardie Avenue SW on the
west and Hayes Place SW on the east from Employment Area-Commercial to Residential Options.
And,that the zoning for this portion of the block be rezoned from CA to Residential - 10 DU/AC to
reflect this new designation.
2. That if Option 3 is pursued, that Policy LU-69 be amended to allow limited expansions of existing
Residential Multi-family Infill designated areas and that a new policy be developed precluding the
development of any new Residential Multi-family Infill areas. (See Amendment#98-T-9,)
BACKGROUND:
The block is currently occupied with predominantly residential uses including a single-family lot at the
south end off Hayes Place SW, a ten unit apartment building where SW Victoria Street intersects
Hardie Avenue SW, a vacant lot facing Hardie Avenue SW, a single-family dwelling, a duplex, a
twenty-unit apartment building at the north end of the block where Hardie Avenue SW intersects Renton
Avenue South, and one commercial office building, a converted single-family house at 125 Hardie
Place. The middle portion of the block currently is vacant. Residential uses surround the block to the
west, north (across Renton Avenue S.) and south (across SW Victoria Street). As noted above, strip
commercial uses are adjacent to the site across Hayes Place SW, although physically separated by a
significant grade change. Two lots in the block, however, front on Hayes Place SW where there is no
topographical barrier. These are at the southwest corner of the block..
98M10.DOC/ Page 1
ANALYSIS:
Issue 1. Is property in this block appropriate for commercial development?
The majority of the subject block is currently separated from the commercial area to the east by a steep
slope rising abruptly from Hayes Place SW that isolates the area above and limits major vehicular
access from Renton Avenue South to the north and SR-900 to the south. Figure 3 illustrates this with
its half meter contour lines. A grade change of at least 18 feet exists between the west side of Hayes
Place SW on the east and the east side of Hardie Avenue SE, on the west exists throughout the block
except at its southernmost corner. As a consequence staff do not believe that the majority of this block
is appropriate for Commercial Arterial(CA)zoning.
Issue Z. Should the Employment Area- Commercial land use designation for this site be changed to
Residential Options or Residential Multi family Infill in light of the fact that the block is physically
detached from the commercial areas along Rainier Avenue South to the east and unlikely to develop
with viable strip commercial uses in the future because of its relative isolation?
The block was zoned B-1, Business Use since 1953 with the exception of the northernmost portion
where the apartment building along Renton Avenue S. is located. This was previously zoned R-4. In
June, 1993 the City adopted interim zoning for the block that changed the majority of it to Mixed
Residential (MR). The single-family lot at the intersection of SW Victoria Street, Hayes Place SW and
Rainier Avenue N was left Single-family(SF). Included in the portion zoned MR was the 13,500 sq. ft.
vacant lot just north of the 10-unit apartment complex near the intersection of SW Victoria Street and
Hardie Avenue SW. When the City adopted its new Comprehensive Plan and concurrent Zoning Code
in 1995,the whole block was given an Employment Area - Commercial land use designation as well as
its current CA, Commercial Arterial zoning. It would appear, based upon the topography in the area,
current uses on the block, and nearby residential uses that both the current land use designation and
current CA zoning are inappropriate if residential uses are no longer allowed under the EA-C
designation or the CA zone.
Staff have looked at three options that might be considered as a means of retaining residential uses on
this block while recognizing that the City is interested in deleting or significantly reducing new
opportunities for residential in its commercial zones. The City recently adopted a moratorium on multi-
family development in its commercial zones.
Option 1. The first option would be to continue to allow multifamily development in the CA Zone but
only as a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use. Criteria would specify that such residential would be
restricted to small lots of 20,000 sq. ft. in size or less, could not have frontage on major arterial streets,
and must be within a 1/2 mile walking distance of schools, shopping, and community/neighborhood
parks, and must abut or be adjacent to other multi-family zoned properties.
Option 2. The second option would be to redesignate the subject site Residential Options with
concurrent rezoning from CA to R-10 (10 du/ac). This designation and zoning would be consistent with
properties to the south, west and north of the subject block. (King County's R-6 zoning exists to the
west in those areas in unincorporated King County.)Prior to its rezoning to CA, staff had proposed R-
10 zoning for most of this block. Under R-10 zoning the portion of the block that staff are
recommending for redesignation and rezoning, approximately 1.2 acres, could accommodate 12 units if
starting afresh but if the existing 20 unit apartment building at the north end of the block were to
remain, as allowed under the R-10 zoning, the proposed portion of the block being considered for
redesignation and rezoning could accommodate 29 units versus the 23 units now on this portion of the
block. This option would only necessitate a map change.
98M10.DOC/
Option 3. The third option would be to redesignate the subject portion of the block from EA-C to RM-I
with a concurrent rezone from CA to RM - I. The justification for this approach is that it would allow
densities closer to those that now exist on the block because of the existing two apartment buildings. At
10-20 du/ac this zoning allows 10-24 units if the area was cleared and all new development occurred.
This, however, is unlikely since the 20 unit structure at the north end of the block is likely to stay.
Assuming the apartment building facing Renton Avenue South stays, the portion of the block under
consideration (0.81 acres) could then accommodate at maximum of 36 units for a net increase of 13
units. However, in order to redesignate this area Residential Multi-family - Infill, current land use
policies would need to be amended.
Current residential Policy LU-69 states:
LU-69. Residential Multi family Infill designations should not be expanded. Land within the districts
should be used efficiently to meet multi family housing needs.
Designating all or a portion of the subject block MF-I presumably would be construed as an expansion
of this designation. There are, however, similar spots of RM-I along the east side of Rainier Avenue
South between the CA Zone and adjacent single-family Residential - 8 DU/AC Zone which serve as a
transition between the commercial zoning along Rainier and the single-family zoned areas to the west.
A similar RM - I designation here although appearing to be consistent with these prior designations to
the north of Renton Avenue South would require that Policy LU-69 be amended.
Staff are recommending that the northern three-fourths of the block be redesignated from Employment
Area - Commercial to Residential Options with concurrent rezoning from Commercial Arterial (CA) to
Residential-10 Units per Acre. This option avoids any conflict with the City's existing moratorium on
multi-family development within the City's commercial zones as well as existing land use policies.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE:
Option 1. Allowing residential to remain in the Employment Area - Commercial designation is
consistent with current EA-C policies and does not require any amendments to current policy.
Option 2. Redesignating the northern most portion of the subject block to Residential Options is
supported by existing policies:
LU-48: Residential neighborhoods may be considered for the Residential Options Designation if they
meet three of the following criteria:
a. The area already has a mix of small scale multi family units or had long standing duplex or
low density multi family zoning;
b. Development patterns are established;
c. Vacant lots exist or parcels have redevelopment potential;
d. Few new roads or major utility upgrades will be needed with further development; and,
e. The site is located adjacent to a Center designation.
The portion of the block that is under consideration for redesignation and rezoning currently has a mix
including a 20 unit apartment building, a duplex and a single-family dwelling. Development patterns
are fairly well established since it is unlikely that the 20 unit apartment will redevelop to a lower
density, and there is no indication that the existing duplex or single family dwelling would develop to
other uses in the foreseeable future. A 0.42 acre vacant site does exist which represents slightly more
98M10.DOC/ Page 3
than 50% of the portion of the block that would be redesignated. And, the subject site is within two
blocks of the Center Downtown designation and is also adjacent to an existing Residential Options
designated area to its north.
Option 3 which would redesignate the portion of the subject site from EA-C to MF-I does not comply
with current Residential Multi-family policies including Policy LU-69 which states:
Policy LU-69: Residential Multi family Infill designations should not be expanded. Land within the
districts should be used efficiently to meet multi family housing needs.
This policy would have to be amended to allow either the expansion and/or creation of new RM-I
designations depending how this policy is interpreted. Since the subject site is not located within or
contiguous to an existing RM-I area designation, it appears likely that a new area would need to be
created. Criteria would also need to be established to ensure that only minor areas could be created or
expanded so as not to undermine existing policy.
Also, Options 2 and 3 which assume that residential uses would no longer be allowed in the CA Zone
require amending a number of Comprehensive Plan land use policies regarding residential uses in the
Employment Area - Commercial designation. These include Policy LU-171, Policy LU-172, Policy
LU-178, and Policy 179. Option 3, regarding creating a new Residential Multi-family designation
would also require amendments to the Residential Multi-family Infill policies, including Policy LU-69
since a new area would most likely need to be designated under this option to include the subject block.
ZONING CODE CONCURRENCE:
Under Option 1, to retain residential in the CA Zone but only as a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use,
the CA Zone would have to be amended deleting residential as a Secondary Use and listing it as a
Hearing Examiner Conditional Use with conditions as to the size of lot, location, and proximity to
supporting services.
Under Option 2, to redesignate the portion of the subject block between Hardie Avenue SW and Hayes
Place SW from EA-C to Residential Options the site would also need to be rezoned to Residential, 10
DU/AC to be concurrent. No text amendments are anticipated with this map change.
Under Option 3, to redesignate the portion of the subject block between Hardie Avenue SW and Hayes
Place SW from EA-C to Residential Multi-family -I Infill, the site would also need to be rezoned to
Residential Multi-family Infill to be concurrent. No text amendments are anticipated with this map
change.
No changes are anticipated to the R-10, CA, or MF - I zones as a consequence of any of these three
options.
98M 10.DOC/
Wi
CU I - • Vim'
cS
3EllirNW2ndPIz
QJ al 00
Q Qn
W,
1
O ZrS
1
d
c5
7W 2nd St
i
1
r 1 PP
4 ,•
411in
S
e".„/ \ 011110 ,
1.
1 Z
SZe
CU
1
S W VI4 IIIItoriQStthoriaMI a)
Ave SW \
L MI Q
QJ
SW2ndSt
E111111111 ditCS
rall Q--I
1 00' 400'1111-92
0 01
1 : ,400
1 :2,410
S 2nd St
Figure 1 : Study Area ( 98 — M - 1O )
t Neighborhoods & Strategictrategic Planning
Renton City Limits
o'
T.ol ar1e 199.8acne Parcels considered for redesignation
1-• -
L',..-:,,;,..',.`'....•'!-(•,,
tv.
47.
i-ct...§..•-
g.,"''.-•:• ,••.,-.•„:•,•„.'':,
1
4.
I
to
C
r
v2
re.
O
O_
r}^
k,, •
t
y ,'
C+'
S7n'
ss".
u.,
t,
ah,
a.
a,,
e-' '
f
1'"
7 ,
1`
b.., ,
Mx
d
Z
mil'
o'
F
k.. ''.
J
3 •
l•
s •;
1
ills
a
F
R_
s '
ts °
N` }. '
F
stZ'
a3-
r'
J.s..-
a:- '
ra' - - '
K
i
VI
x
1*
It.
i''
rY
6
FeS'
s-
a
df'. .
h-
a .
s
01
a•"
fr
S;
x, ?`' .
K
mrr
sc `
off • '
j,. `,"+}
i"•,
I.,
4
I.
1 >
x
7 •"
s
a
a
m
l
z
ro -
c
1-
Xy,
x ,
4 +
a
f11
O73
i
xY'+
a
s - •
l
4'
v '
ex `'
a
w.+..
Ar
t7Y
t • .
M'
i
Y $ -.»*]
4—
xx '-'•
w•• ?
S
i
y
4
y
Y`
a _}
rxr,
Mla
f•
b-:•.
1
f ,
fir
Cu
1
s5
V
l
Y
4 }
k
s
r ..
e
t .
i
h
S
t
c
E
a.
w"
r4,;
Y'
y
a-'
ii7iir
F.:
3
c.:.•
7
1 -
i@Nl.'-.
t `
t{}
c,:.,
a",
4,
a'.. ,,,
r..:.
s _" ,•
z.
nm
y
7
J `.."
a,
q
1
0
r'_
r
s'•
s4*
fix
P= (:
s
0*.
r' '
t
c
F !
a.
in
F,
x
Z.
3s
s
t,
y3.
y
T ,
j
rs
s
a ,.
4y6
zt`
M "
b`
a«
y
at3.,
r
I
fir'
U
a'
J
1 ,•
s• ''
rj}'
i ,
Y .,
Ml,
y
K
1AO
hZi -
i.
S'
1 •
s•
F :
1
L
4
1X
T
J
k
r:, •
f`
i
a
F`
a- : _
X
k .
s•
j
t •
d
x `
s-
y -'
a•
a
7 - .,,
m.-
a
L,:
t
a
its - .
1
is..
s ''
Sa
dt
r.
x,
w., "'
xi
f
t ,,
sc
fY
C—
eY
c.`
sJ^
s
t <
fi'
yF
ay` ,.+ ;°
1a ,
sa
a
85aY `
t'
iv,
s
t+ ,,
CO
I
b .
l-
a
5"'
s ,......,•,. ..
s
r
5a'
s
t+
g'
lr
v ,
c,-
h
y,,
r¢
t ,¢
5,°' ;
i;:,
1
M
I . .,, * •,
yr
ti .,,
4,
m'°
a
4. ,
i` '
f
a '"
y,.,
no
R.,
y
fin.
F,,
3JQ
w,
t
i ,.• .,
p.
Q
f
Y '`
w.
S `
l
ry, „
y
IY
I } ,
y,..
y/
i
s
w
re
1
to
try`
0.-
R
f
t " ,.
3-
24rd:>,. '.
r
t. •
ds
Cam..
i
v.
Yn•
z
y
1
F'
O
C",
Utz '.'• •
z
h
N.
441117.z
XX ''
a $ `'•!
T .,
4
s ..
q'
si.
t
1
r
5.
A
l•
t ?`*'+
tY •
lr+
r
a$
4
t• •
r •°..
x
xa
xi !.''
a4
5
1>',
r+ ''
i
K' .>
tif; '-
e
M.• _
y
fi
8° '
a:.,
u,.. .,
j
j
a:
k,„
5,» -
a
t .
v
t.
s
e
1.
4
z
h,,,
h ., <.
a
ae
77f( ` ( ..
yc'"
1.. ` •'
V
9
p+
l
fie
t•'
04,),
l
t
I
t °:•
tom
u
a `"
cr
t
t>>
it
r7
f
a "
a3,.
1
M ., ,`
r.
i
y',:
ri
s
L^ -,
sf'-
M1; '.,
5` .
r
f
o
r•'
G`+
T
w.",
44b
14 _
f
2-:-::,,-......---„,.„.,,„..„-...,„--,„ .,,;;:-
i
s "..
w ;- `
F ,
7_`' """."^':
S"
iwr -,;,
t ._
yf,
a
w'"'"':-.'}
y
y
e -`,"
f .-
er •
4
V3
0
LarW
a
x . '. .
a
y
r,
c: -
r.
t<
A
a¢
st
tY, ''.' - .
M: .
s` •
r » ;
C
05
4e4.-
1-
as !;.
f,
ems'. '"
r„
A ,.
Yx
c
if
A\ °
0
0
2cr2 •
i
s
a•
a ;
sea
7
W
ri
Y
v •
4*
t,
m
i
f;
d.
71 .
7{
b`
x
s
3 •
r
I* } '
s
s.
K,
b
kG+
n+!°.'
y,
t
is ?:'
4Fh•
r
a
r'
x '`
K'
L. • •
Ian -
r•1
afty
n
a,«
r:>
x+
r:
r
It,.t
a
m
T /
0
p.
q
i, .
t?
f'
9k:-'
s$'.
t
Fes`
yN: ,.,
1•' . -,'
1)
Qs
V
lit
s ,,
a+
x
x "
a
V,
It.
I
a..
s
He
4A'
k.
b. +
x. ,
q.
l,Zr,
K :
7`
r3
ry
f `!
r;
ySl• -,
q •
v'
ti
Y
wvr.
R.
d"',
rs+
at '
1-.
Ai
0
1110
a.
w:
r.-
Y •
xt •
y'
p„ •
t?
1..,- . .'
Yu
4 '*
QO
FA
C.1
a+
sr
c'
1
s'
k•#
aw
z .+
16
w.""
S
R'
b.,' • "
Y
may.- •_ . .,.
a :-.
F-
i
h''-.},.,:.'
L4:`
a*'
S ^
A .
00
Y_, .'"`..'-
7
to
e '
p -`
y8
gx
1G
5-
q. •
x
s .
3' .'.
t">
4
a
r'
2 -'
yd-.
4+'*
t `.>
r ''
7.
v
s
y
r
g
F" ` %';.
xfi , +
w•s``
tvx ( ...'-
A .„
f ,,
x .
w. '
s #
r
j
etC
S
rti
h
a.
s(
A- _
rs_
k
a ,
i
i
e
x'
r''.
a
y
t.
a.
0
t,
d-
s01.
x
ls#
je. '
s
is
O
4. .
1'
l
Sr
ay , .
rtf
c
v- ,.}- ',,
i„,
urx
fix
i
ryas -
r
T. '^
mr '
G
7-
1-
rxy
P{
e.,
4 : ,,
v
rf
a:. -'
x '
i'.
v
3,-/'
ri
r -. }
gyfga
I,,, ,
r1Wi•`
3 ..
e'
M.-
s
1 ',
3'
rC`
y
l ^
n•
w.
aa^•
4}
y '
7
4i
F ,
ur }'•
s,
r
s' •
2':
s+
t:
1 -
i
7 •}
ti. ,-.
y
1;.`.
e ,.
ti.,.
f
i
es•
weir _ --
tier. .—.
c
r& -
1.',_.._-..-
rc .
i
re.."....:` ....,+
s .
L_'
3::_. -,
1Y _ __ _ _
h- -•
l
R _ E) CJ
c5 MIN
Si CA
NW 2nd Pl
Q Q
o
c5
d
NW 2nd St
0or 411 E..,......... IMINEse
el 4,,,eCA
411 z•
a)
e, -(\
k,(P
11): E
i
SW Vi Q
toriQ St oria VINIMIEM
0)
SW Q
R 10
e
L
d I
SW2nd I c A
a.) 1.-.
go ,I 0 0' 400'92 1
1:• ,400 CS C l S 2nd St
Figure 3 : Existing Zoning 98—M- 10 °
400
ti,c- o , Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning 1 :2,4 0 0
Q. ED/N/SP Zoning BoundariesT. Schlepp, R. MacOnie
0... 3o March 1998 Renton City Limits
itapvi 1\
11.2 641
11.49
I18.54 I 5
0 X '
X 11.24
1 :111 1'a.
X
x
5.14 J471 Iv
11 20
iiik •,44, s ,)
11,fri.---:II,\',
illik.1\
U
1". • 7 44111MS::— z,,,,— ---'--- \\N N , i.\\
ii/--
4011111111r_ lee- NIV 11
2;- ------::::----- ,__ V:\'\'\\\•\ \
weitzliii..„„„„ ..... \, ‘,_, \V T *7,,,,,\\\_\\,,,--, f7k1 w
R6 .40 k0. ,- Illio 1 x
r_ ,2_,,,. .... A AtlS--11111-1(- 4 la la II 1 ()\ e
3x5,
2317 25.
14171/ 4111 761111111 11454
1 N\\\ C
Figure 4: .5m Contours ( 98 -M- 1O) °: .:: 2.00
otiQo Neighborhoods & Strategictrategic Planning 1 : 1 ,2 0 0
ED/N/SP
eoT oSchlepp,19R9.8MacOnie Parcels considered for redesignation
GT2-I G-1 I Ism
CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
MAR 3 1 19(8
Purpose of Checklist: RECEIVED
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental
agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant
adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide
information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid
impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is
required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal.
Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the
mosi precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most
cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans
without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not
apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the
questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark
desil.nations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies
can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period
of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your
proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to
explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there
may be significant adverse impacts.
Use Checklist for Nonproiect Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly)
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not
apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
parr D).
For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in
the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as
proposal," proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
City of Renton Environmen .hecklist 3/31/98
Page 2
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: 1998 Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA) 98-M-10 is proposed which addresses the Land Use
Element. This is a non-project action. No new development is proposed as a result of this CPA.
2. Name of applicant:
City of Renton
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Michael D. Kattermann,Director;Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning; (206)277-6190;
Staff Contact: Troy Schlepp, (206)277-6167
Address: 200 Mill Avenue S.; Renton,WA 98055
4. Date checklist prepared:
March 30, 1998
5. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Renton,Economic Development/Neighborhoods/Strategic Planning
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Planning Commission hearings to be held in April and May, 1998,and public hearings and
recommendations to be done near the end of May, 1998.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
None at this time.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal.
Draft EIS for the City of Renton Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, January, 1992.
Final EIS for the City of Renton Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan,February, 1993.
Supplemental EIS for the Comprehensive Plan,December, 1994.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals
directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
This amendment is tied to proposed text amendment 98-T-3 relating to residential uses in the EA-C
and Centers designations.
10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Proposed CPA will require action by the City Council.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of
the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe
certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
The City proposes to re-evaluate the land use designation for this block of 7 properties. The area was
designated MR (equivalent to R-10) in 1993, and then changed to EA-C in 1995 when stand alone
CPASEPA.DOC
City of Renton Environmental Checklist 3/31/98
Page 3
residential uses were added to the Commercial Arterial zoning. This amendment is tied to proposed
text amendment 98-T-3, which evaluates residential uses in Employment Area Commercial,
Employment Area Valley and the Suburban and Neighborhood Center designations. A new approach
may be needed for the parcels within this block if the decision is made to remove residential uses from
the Employment Area-Commercial designation.All of the parcels in this block may not have adequate
access and visibility to support commercial development. The analysis will evaluate several
alternatives including 1) change to Multi-family Infill Designation, 2) change to Residential Options
Designation, 3)No change in designation but changes in the regulatory approach to residential uses
within the existing designation. A change to Multi-family Designation may also require a text
amendment to Land Use Policy LU-69 which currently prohibits expansion of multi-family infill
designations. This policy will be analyzed in the context of proposed solutions for these properties
and in terms of the potential Citywide implications of a policy change.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and
range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or
boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography
map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you
are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications
related to this checklist.
See Figure 1 and attached legal description.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site(circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep, slopes,mountainous,
other
Sloped.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?)
180%.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example, scaly, sand, gravel,peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
prime farmland.
The soils on the site are Beausite(BeC and BeD)gravelly sandy loam(USDA Soil
Conservation Service, 1972).
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
In general,geological hazards in Renton include areas susceptible to damage from landslides,
earthquakes,and coal mine collapses. A portion of the most northern parcel on the site has
been designated as a high erosion hazard(City of Renton sensitive area map).
e. Describe the purpose,type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed.
Indicate source of fill.
Not applicable. This is a non-project action.
CPASEPA.DOC
City of Renton Environmental Checklist 3/31/98
Page 4
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
Erosion could occur if clearing was done on the steep slopes or in the high erosion hazard areas.
This,however,is a non-project action and no new development is proposed as a consequence of
this CPA.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
Not applicable. This is a non-project action.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
Not applicable. This is a non-project action.
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e., dust, automobile,
odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If
any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
Not applicable. This is a non-project action.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emission?
Emissions from neighboring residences and automobile traffic.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
Not applicable. This is a non-project action.
3. WATER
a. Surface Water:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year-
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
There are no surface water bodies on or within a quarter mile of the site.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described
waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans.
Not applicable. This is a non-project action.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from
surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate
the source of fill material.
Not applicable. This is a non-project action.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description,purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
Not applicable. This is a non-project action.
CPASEPA.DOC
City of Renton Environmental Checklist 3/31/98
Page 5
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
The site does not lie within a 100-year floodplain.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
Not applicable. This is a non-project action.
b. Ground Water:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give
general description,purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
Not applicable. This is a non-project action.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other
sources, if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of
such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals
or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
Not applicable. This is a non-project action.
c. Water Runoff(including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and
disposal,if any(include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water
flow into other waters,If so, describe.
Not applicable. This is a non-project action.
2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
Not applicable. This is a non-project action.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
Not applicable. This is a non-project action.
4. PLANTS
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: Unknown.
deciduous tree: alder,maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
grass
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily,eel grass,milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
CPASEPA.DOC
City of Renton Environmennt=Checklist 3/31/98
Page 6
Not applicable. This is a non-project action.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
Unknown.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measure to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site,if any:
Not applicable. This is a non-project action.
5. ANIMALS
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known
to be on or near the site: Unknown.
Birds: hawk, heron,eagle, songbirds, other
Mammals: deer, bear, elk,beaver, other
Fish: bass, salmon,trout, herring, shellfish, other
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
Unknown.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain
Unknown.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas,wood,wood stove, solar)will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,
generally describe.
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of
fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so, describe.
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
CPASEPADOC
City of Renton Environmehuu Checklist 3/31/98
Page 7
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the areas which may affect your project(for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
None that would affect the proposal.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)?
Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The site currently has two single family residences, one duplex,two multi-family complexes,
one professional office,and one vacant lot. The site is surrounded by commercial uses to the
north, south, and east; and residential uses to the west.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
Unknown.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
As stated previously,there are two single family residential structures, one duplex,two multi-
family complexes (10 unit and 20 unit), and a professional office (a converted house).
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what?
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
The current zoning classification of the site is Commercial Arterial.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
The current comprehensive plan designation of the site is Employment Area-Commercial.
g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
Not applicable.
CPASEPA.DOC
City of Renton Environmental Checklist 3/31/98
Page 8
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,
specify.
As stated previously, a portion of the northern parcel has an erosion hazard.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any:
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans,if any:
None.
9. HOUSING
a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high, middle,
or low-income housing.
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
10. AESTHETICS
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s)proposed.
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any:
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur?
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
CPASEPA.DOC
City of Renton Environme:__.__ Checklist 3/31/98
Page 9
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
12. RECREATION
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Renton High School is within a quarter mile of the site.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
The proposed non-project action will not displace any existing recreational uses.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for,national state, or local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
Unknown.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or
cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
None known.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
None are necessary. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
14. TRANSPORTATION
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the
existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
The site is served by Renton Ave S,Hardie Ave SW,Hayes PI SW, and Victoria Ave SW.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the
nearest transit stop?
Unknown.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the
project eliminate?
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
CPASEPADOC
City of Renton Environmei u. Checklist 3/31/98
Page 10
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or
streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or
private?
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
No.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If
known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire
protection,police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any.
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
16. UTILITIES
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas,water, refuse service,
telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
Unknown.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might
be needed.
Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action.
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and
complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-
significance a i ht issue in reli: upon this checklist should there be any willful
misrepresen ion or will ack o' ull ' ure on my part.
Proponent:
Name Printed:iU
Date Submitted: Reei i4157
CPASEPA.DOC
City of Renton Environmental Checklist 3/31/98
Page 11
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS: 98-M-10
This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies,plans and programs.
Do not use this sheet for project actions.)
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities
likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate
than if the proposal were not implemented Respond briefly and in general terms.
NOTE: The following responses on this Supplemental Sheet are tailored to City of Renton sponsored
Land Use Map designation changes. Comprehensive Plan amendment 98-M-10 relates to this
Land Use Map change.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production,
storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
The proposal would not directly result in changes to any of these areas since this is a non-project
action. At the time new development does occur,whether in response to this amendment or existing
land use policies, it will have to,unless exempt, comply with SEPA and its impacts disclosed.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
Not applicable.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
The proposal would not directly result in changes to any of these areas since this is a non-project
action. The impacts of individual projects are determined on a site specific basis.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
Not applicable.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
The proposal would not directly result in changes to any of these areas since this is a non-project
action. The impacts of individual projects are determined on a site specific basis. The maximum
number of new units that could be developed under the subject proposal would be 13 additional units.
This assumes non-conforming as to density apartment complexes stay and only under developed sites
develop at the maximum allowed 20 du/ac.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
Not applicable.
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas
designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness,
wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites,
wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
The proposal would not directly result in changes to any of these areas since this is a non-project
action. The impacts of individual projects are determined on a site specific basis.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
Not applicable.
CPASEPA.DOC
City of Renton Environmei uu Checklist 3/31/98
Page 12
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would
allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
This proposed land use redesignation and concurrent rezone with a policy change would lessen the
intensity of development on the site in question from what could develop under the current land use
designation and zoning. With the recommended change to Policy LU-69 the subject proposal would
be compatible with existing plans.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
On a site specific basis,new development would be reviewed for potential land use impacts and
mitigation measures applied.
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and
utilities?
The proposal would not directly result in changes to any of these areas since this is a non-project
action. The impacts of individual projects are determined on a site specific basis. The maximum
number of new units that could be developed under the subject proposal would be 13 additional units.
This assumes non-conforming as to density apartment complexes stay and only under developed sites
develop at the maximum allowed 20 du/ac. Assuming 6.6 AWDTEs for new apartments there would
be a maximum increase of 86 vehicular trips per day or about 10 trips per hour. No major impacts
are therefore anticipated on transportation of public services or utilities.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
Concurrency policies will help ensure that increased demands on transportation or public services and
utilities are met in a timely manner for new development.
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
The subject non-project CPA is not in conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for
the protection of the environment. In fact,the proposed CPA is intended to be in compliance with the
State's Growth Management Act,the Shoreline Management Act, and the State Environmental
Protection Act.
SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and
complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-
significance that it might issue in reliance this checklist should there be any willful
misrepresentation w ack off 11 's osure my part.
Proponent:
Name Printed: n-- 1U14- 7 IL-
Date Submitted: gi,(/r f T7J
CPASE PADOC
ei I.
cu
Q
c5 MIN
3 ME=NW 2nd Pl 7
n) a
Q Q
o zs
L
1—
NW 2 n d St
t"j4', 40z
cp,
N;co‘o
SW Victoria St koria J
1 Ave SW Q11111LW
tySW23
nd St
aii ..
00' 400'1141_92
400 1 :2,410
Z.
S 2nd St
Figure 1 : Study Area ( 98 — M - 1O )
o ' Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
ED/N/SP Renton CityLimitsT. Schlepp, R. MacOnie4.
o' 30 March 1998 Parcels considered for redesignation
PLANNING AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION
WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS
LAND LSE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS
REQUIREMENTS: BY BYE
Application Fees X City sponsored application.
Environmental Checklist
Existing Cov;Hants (Recorded Copy)City sponsored application.
Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) X City sponsored application.
Justification 'or CPA and/or CPA/Rezone X See issue paper.
King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site X Mailing labels list based upon
i(\
r\-
1\(-- Technical Services data base.
Legal Description X To be provided prior to ERC review.
List of Surrounding Property Owners
Mailing Labels of Property Owners
9
Map of Exist ng Site Conditions X \( Refer to Figures 2 &4 of Issue Paper.
Master Appli ation Form
Neighborhood Detail Map X
1(\
See Figures 1 & 3 of Issue Paper.
Plan Reductions (PMT's)' X` Figure 1 provided at 8 1/2x11. Other
reductions can be made prior to
posting.
Postage X City sponsored application.
Project Narrative X }': See issue paper
Title Report lr Plat Certificate X ti\r\_\(\ City sponsored application.
Topography Map (5'contours) X See Figure 4 of Issue Paper.
APPLICATION: 98-Mz-10
DATE:
DEVELOPMENT
OF RENTON
PLANNING
MAR 31 1998
RECEIVED
I I:\DIVISION.SU'-TS\PLANNING\AMENDS\19981M 10MTRAP.DOC\LG