Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA64-210
114 i IJ-i- I°'--3/4 \N 'N S.S,N 1 r r-J ram, 11---1 i i 13 © th'1L t Lu a S v:oe z 1- e' 1-:°\ ' Ao 0 -s. J.) ________------------ACC" z o S 7 ,:), tdJ 4 IA 0.---i- 1 Li 0 "-. 1 , a._) .1} l 5 0 11°I 5j '. u.)> o J. ..: t ________-------- 13 - • . .-c- 'boot. 9. -1- rA - p. 00 l'zc 40 f) . . J 14 T-n rrrrrrrr Ai 05 OVVME.f : MR. MR5. \fJ.C. S1EGELNAAQ pa . E 3X 71,,5 50A,F LA>•=• a. , v A°.* .--4 EXISTING •c.3KI ' 'JG T S - i PLOT PLAN P .OPO'SE.D 7.701',J1h1G 2)e I SCALE : 1 = 100' LOTS I - 13 14 -_6,E,L^C.K 5 LOTS I - 13 4. 14 -2tQ 13 LOCK E,c, C .D. I--I I LL t.A4.1,..I5 EAR LI K1GTO i GARDE JS AID, t, 1 ha P— j us S W. TN 3• W. C . Siegelman 3 B® "a' - r r, Rezone . GS-1—to B-1 ' n o i z om II S A L R.r ,..^= lUwIIIItPillIOilG illll III IIlrlll IiI " IIII l ,,1 P SNN pll. = III 111I ! , I /Ip1I , a 1NlllR_3f-- ' I1IIIh i - ; g . i Ho T / 0Il -, lfln I'lWU— . ' lNlilllt 1Il GIIIIIrIr _t iIIMI. n l IIII / y. C deliii MIiiIFL'IiN:.IIS r I' { 1 r R_4 III , III11,1 ii ,J ff----- __ I 7 r I 7 ILWUlloJLLJr_J!W u a - ,>I---- WM W. I`tt...rt.- 1'.. Iir_ 7_ IQ _y I---.---" -_ I- of --4 —\ i_=.4l _i_. --r I- -y--no --y 1 71 --__JI -- _-I --_-1- - .-t I-_y_ - 7FI__-/_--_IQ'-- _- — H - I V,VW// rL .i NRV M T__EADER DO IOIy lC_A1M — i:j111 _ .t I57 U e o 7.;- J I V I Q I MIMI_1 0 o Ei a Z I' COUNCIL REFERRAL HEARING DATE JuneR24 , 1970 APPLICANT W . C . Siegelman FILE NO. R- 210-64 LOCATION Between S :W. Grady Way and F . A. I . 405 between Raymond Avenue S .W . and Thomas Avenue S . W. (not open) i' TOTAL AREAapprox. 3 acr.'. s PRINCIPAL ACCESS S .W. Grady Way EXISTING ZONING GS-1 EXISTING USE Undeveloped 1 PROPOSED USE Commercial COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Light Industrial or Manufacturing Park COMMENTS S 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM "GENERAL SUBURBAN RESIDENCE DISTRICT" (GS-1) TO "BUSINESS DISTRICT" (B-1) WHEREAS under Chapter VII , Title IV (Business Regulations) of Ordi- nance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps adopted in conjunction therewith, the properties hereinbelow described have heretofore been zoned as General Suburban Residence District (GS-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said properties has been filed with the City on or about October 5, 1964, which petition was then referred to the Planning Commission for investi- gation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 28 , 1964 ; all pursuant to notice of hearing duly published and posted as provided by law; and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : The following described parcel of property in the CITY OF RENTON is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) and the City Engi- neer and the Planning Director are hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning: All Blocks 38 and 39, C.D. Hillman' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74 , in King County, Wash- ington, EXCEPT that portion of Block 38 conveyed to the State of Washington for State Highway by deed recorded under auditor-' s file No. 5525661; together with those portions of vacated Thomas and Raymond Aves . SW and SW 12th Street adjoining; subject to a utility easement over the southerly thirty feet of said Block 38 measured perpendicularly to the northerly margins of FAI 405 and SW 13th Street. SECTION II . This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and legal publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF Helmie Nelson, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR THIS DAY OF Avery Garrett, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gerard M. Shelln, City Attorney DATE OF PUBLICATION:. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM "GENERAL SUBURBAN RESIDENCE DISTRICT" (GS-1) TO "BUSINESS DISTRICT" (B-1) WHEREAS under Chapter VII , Title. IV (Business Regulations) of Ordi- nance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps adopted in conjunction therewith, the properties hereinbelow described have heretofore been zoned as General Suburban Residence District (GS-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said properties has been filed with the City on or about October 5, 1964 , which petition was then referred to the Planning Commission for investi- gation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been. held thereon on or about October 28 , 1964 ; all pursuant to notice of hearing duly published and posted as provided by law; and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described parcel of property in the CITY OF RENTON is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) and the City Engi- neer and the Planning Director are hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning: All Blocks 38 and 39, C.D. Hillman' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74 , in King County, Wash- ington, EXCEPT that portion of Block 38 conveyed to the State of Washington for State Highway by deed recorded under auditor' s file No. 5525661; together with those portions of vacated Thomas and Raymond Aves. SW and SW 12th Street adjoining; subject to a utility easement over the southerly thirty feet of said Block 38 measured perpendicularly to the northerly margins of FAI 405 and SW 13th Street. SECTION II . This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and legal publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF Helmie Nelson, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR THIS DAY OF Avery Garrett, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney DATE OF PUBLICATION: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM "GENERAL SUBURBAN RESIDENCE DISTRICT" (GS-1) TO "BUSINESS DISTRICT" (B-1) WHEREAS under Chapter VII , Title IV (Business Regulations) of Ordi- nance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps adopted in conjunction therewith, the properties hereinbelow described have heretofore been zoned as General Suburban Residence District (GS-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said properties has been filed with the City on or about October 5, 1964, which petition was then referred to the Planning Commission for investi- gation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 28 , 1964; all pursuant to notice of hearing duly published and posted as provided by law; and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described parcel of property in the CITY OF RENTON is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) and the City Engi- neer and the Planning Director are hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning: All Blocks 38 and 39, C.D. Hillman' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74 , in King County, Wash- ington, EXCEPT that portion of Block 38 conveyed to the State of Washington for State Highway by deed recorded under auditor' s file No. 5525661; together with those portions of vacated Thomas and Raymond Aves . SW and SW 12th Street adjoining; subject to a utility easement over the southerly thirty feet of said Block 38 measured perpendicularly to the northerly margins of FAI 405 and SW 13th Street. SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and legal publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF Helmie Nelson, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR THIS DAY OF Avery Garrett, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney DATE OF PUBLICATION:. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM "GENERAL SUBURBAN RESIDENCE DISTRICT" (GS-1) TO "BUSINESS DISTRICT" (B-1) WHEREAS under Chapter VII, Title IV (Business Regulations) of Ordi- nance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps adopted in conjunction therewith, the properties hereinbelow described have heretofore been zoned as General Suburban Residence District (GS-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said properties has been filed with the City on or about October 5, 1964 , which petition was then referred to the Planning Commission for investi- gation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 28 , 1964; all pursuant to notice of hearing duly published and posted as provided by law; and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : The following described parcel of property in the CITY OF RENTON is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) and the City Engi- neer and the Planning Director are hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning: All Blocks 38 and 39, C.D. Hillman' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74 , in King County, Wash- ington, EXCEPT that portion of Block 38 conveyed to the State of Washington for State Highway by deed recorded under auditor' s file No. 5525661; together with those portions of vacated Thomas and Raymond Aves . SW and SW 12th Street adjoining; subject to a utility easement over the southerly thirty feet of said Block 38 measured perpendicularly to the northerly margins of FAI 405 and SW 13th Street. SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and legal publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF Helmie Nelson, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR THIS DAY OF Avery Garrett, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney DATE OF PUBLICATION: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM "GENERAL SUBURBAN RESIDENCE DISTRICT" (GS-1) TO "BUSINESS DISTRICT" (B-1) WHEREAS under Chapter VII , Title IV (Business Regulations) of Ordi- nance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps adopted in conjunction therewith, the properties hereinbelow described have heretofore been zoned as General Suburban Residence District (GS-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said properties has been filed with the City on or about October 5, 1964, which petition was then referred to the Planning Commission for investi- gation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 28 , 1964; all pursuant to notice of hearing duly published and posted as provided by law; and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : The following described parcel of property in the CITY OF RENTON is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) and the City Engi- neer and the Planning Director are hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning: All Blocks 38 and 39, C.D. Hillman' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74 , in King County, Wash- ington, EXCEPT that portion of Block 38 conveyed to the State of Washington for State Highway by deed recorded under auditor' s file No. 5525661; together with those portions of vacated Thomas and Raymond Aves. SW and SW 12th Street adjoining; subject to a utility easement over the southerly thirty feet of said Block 38 measured perpendicularly to the northerly margins of FAI 405 and SW 13th Street. SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and legal publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF Helmie Nelson, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR THIS DAY OF Avery Garrett, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney DATE OF PUBLICATION:. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM "GENERAL SUBURBAN RESIDENCE DISTRICT" (GS-1) TO "BUSINESS DISTRICT" (B-1) WHEREAS under Chapter VII, Title IV (Business Regulations) of Ordi- nance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps adopted in conjunction therewith, the properties hereinbelow described have heretofore been zoned as General Suburban Residence District (GS-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said properties has been filed with the City on or about October 5, 1964, which petition was then referred to the Planning Commission for investi- gation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 28, 1964; all pursuant to notice of hearing duly published and posted as provided by law; and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR. AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described parcel of property in the CITY OF RENTON is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) and the City Engi- neer and the Planning Director are hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning: All Blocks 38 and 39, C.D. Hillman' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74 , in King County, Wash- ington, EXCEPT that portion of Block 38 conveyed to the State of Washington for State Highway by deed recorded under auditor' s file No. 5525661; together with those portions of vacated Thomas and Raymond Aves. SW and SW 12th Street adjoining; subject to a utility easement over the southerly thirty feet of said Block 38 measured perpendicularly to the northerly margins of FAI 405 and SW 13th Street. • SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and legal publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF Helmie Nelson, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR THIS DAY OF Avery Garrett, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney DATE OF PUBLICATION: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM "GENERAL SUBURBAN RESIDENCE DISTRICT" (GS-1) TO "BUSINESS DISTRICT" (B-1) WHEREAS under Chapter VII , Title IV (Business Regulations) of Ordi- nance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps adopted in conjunction therewith, the properties hereinbelow described have heretofore been zoned as General Suburban Residence District (GS-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said properties has been filed with the City on or about October 5, 1964, which petition was then referred to the Planning Commission for investi- gation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 28 , 1964; all pursuant to notice of hearing duly published and posted as provided by law; and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described parcel of property in the CITY OF RENTON is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) and the City Engi- neer and the Planning Director are hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning: All Blocks 38 and 39, C.D. Hillman' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74 , in King County, Wash- ington, EXCEPT that portion of Block 38 conveyed to the State of Washington for State Highway by deed recorded under auditor' s file No. 5525661; together with those portions of vacated Thomas and Raymond Aves. SW and SW 12th Street adjoining; subject to a utility easement over the southerly thirty feet of said Block 38 measured perpendicularly to the northerly margins of FAI 405 and SW 13th Street. SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and legal publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF Helmie Nelson, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR THIS DAY OF Avery Garrett, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney DATE OF PUBLICATION: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM "GENERAL SUBURBAN RESIDENCE DISTRICT" (GS-1) TO "BUSINESS DISTRICT" (B-1) WHEREAS under Chapter VII, Title IV (Business Regulations) of Ordi- nance No. 1.628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps adopted in conjunction therewith, the properties hereinbelow described have heretofore been zoned as General Suburban Residence District (GS-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said properties has been filed with the City on or about October 5, 1964, which petition was then referred to the Planning Commission for investi- gation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 28 , 1964; all pursuant to notice of hearing duly published and posted as provided by law; and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described parcel of property in the CITY OF RENTON is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) and the City Engi- neer and the Planning Director are hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning: All Blocks 38 and 39, C.D. Hillman' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74 , in King County, Wash- ington, EXCEPT that portion of Block 38 conveyed to the State of Washington for State Highway by deed recorded under auditor' s file No. 5525661; together with those portions of vacated Thomas and Raymond Aves . SW and SW 12th Street adjoining; subject to a utility easement over the southerly thirty feet of said Block 38 measured perpendicularly to the northerly margins of FAI 405 and SW 13th Street. SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and legal publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF Helmie Nelson, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR THIS DAY OF Avery Garrett, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney DATE OF PUBLICATION:. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM "GENERAL SUBURBAN RESIDENCE DISTRICT" (GS-1) TO "BUSINESS DISTRICT" (B-1) WHEREAS under Chapter VII , Title IV (Business Regulations) of Ordi- nance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps adopted in conjunction therewith, the properties hereinbelow described have heretofore been zoned as General Suburban Residence District (GS-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said properties has been filed with the City on or about October 5, 1964, which petition was then referred to the Planning Commission for investi- gation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 28 , 1964; all pursuant to notice of hearing duly published and posted as provided by law; and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : The following described parcel of property in the CITY OF RENTON is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) and the City Engi- neer and the Planning Director are hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning: All Blocks 38 and 39, C. D. Hillman' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74 , in King County, Wash- ington, EXCEPT that portion of Block 38 conveyed to the State of Washington for State Highway by deed recorded under auditor' s file No. 5525661; together with those portions of vacated Thomas and Raymond Aves. SW and SW 12th Street adjoining; subject to a utility easement over the southerly thirty feet of said Block 38 measured perpendicularly to the northerly margins of FAI 405 and SW 13th Street. SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and legal publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF Helmie Nelson, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR THIS DAY OF Avery Garrett, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney DATE OF PUBLICATION:. I I C'. "1 .1 f---- ey ,.i .:::10,,,,..x.....7L.4..„ 1 - I 02144.44 tjee,' ORDINANCE NO.O /G AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM "GENERAL SUBURBAN RESIDENCE DISTRICT" (GS-1) TO "BUSINESS DISTRICT" (B-1) WHEREAS under Chapter VII, Title IV (Business Regulations) of Ordi- nance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps adopted in conjunction therewith, the properties hereinbelow described have heretofore been zoned as General Suburban Residence District (GS-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said properties has been filed with the City on or about October 5, 1964,. which petition was then referred to the Planning Commission for investi- gation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 28, 1964; all pursuant to notice of hearing duly published and posted as provided by law; and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described parcel of property in the CITY OF RENTON is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) and the City Engi- neer and the Planning Director are hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning: All Blocks 38 and 39, C.D. Hillman ' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74 , in King County, Wash- ington, EXCEPT that portion of Block 38 conveyed to the State of Washington for State Highway by deed recorded under auditor' s file No. 5525661 ; together with those portions of vacated Thomas and Raymond Aves. SW and SW 12th Street adjoining; subject to a utility easement over the southerly thirty feet of said Block 38 measured perpendicularly to the northerly margins of FAI 405 and SW 13th Street. SECTION II . This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and legal publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF Helmie Nelson, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR THIS DAY OF Avery Garrett, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney, DATE OF PUBLICATION: I V1;c> ) INTER-OFFICE MEMO TO: Helmie Nelson, City Clerk DATE October 7, 1970 FROM: Lyman Houk ti/RE: 'Ordinance 2588 Rezone from CS-1 to B-1 (Siecxelms..) o I have checked the legal description on the above-captioned and find it in order. Very truly yours , Lyman Houk ORDINANCE NO. e) 5g D AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM "GENERAL SUBURBAN RESIDENCE DISTRICT" (GS-1) TO "BUSINESS DISTRICT" (B-i) ' WHEREAS under Chapter VII , Title IV (Business Regulations) of Ordi- nance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps adopted in conjunction therewith, the properties hereinbelow described have heretofore been zoned as General Suburban Residence District (GS-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said properties has been filed with the City on or about October 5, 1964, which petition was then referred to the Planning Commission for investi- gation, study and public hearing , and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 28 , 1964 ; all pursuant to notice of hearing duly published and posted as provided by law; and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : The following described parcel of property in the CITY OF RENTON is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) and the City Engi- neer and the Planning Director are hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning: All Blocks 38 and 39 , C. D. Hillman ' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74 , in King County, Wash- ington, EXCEPT that portion of Block 38 conveyed to the State of Washington for State Highway by deed recorded under auditor' s file No. 5525661 ; together with those portions of vacated Thomas and Raymond Ayes . SW and SW 12th Street adjoining; subject to a utility easement over the southerly thirty feet of said Block 38 measured perpendicularly to the northerly margins of FAI 405 and SW 13th Street. SECTION II . This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage , approval and legal publication. . d i .(2.'41'66 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS p. DAY OF k ;f:,:f 41j • (} Helmie Nelson-, "Ci. y •Cle c e 1 78 30 APPROVED BY THE MAYOR THIS '' DAY OF relo l 9,7p 6 p Alc/144144-- Ave y Garre ,Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: c Ger rd Shllancity Att orney DATE OF PUBLICATION: OCT 9 197O 16,moo.°'44)1 PAGt l t'J a aa sr u iq'` DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS 5 s'i y4.I 5i 4^ t:All 11 p y I'' YY E A.7 ,' '6N i:,SLJ" 't® a nd"h• d•.RE v of Yp.• ., •/' WilliamJ. O'Neil 'an his 'wif.i d e:, ark,=theawners' of the followin g:,.'real property ir}, the city'.•'of Renton,, county,,-„;'Of!'{n'::' Kin ,' tate 'of Washington de scvilWashintAn; descvi,as 1 i xr qp• ;.; 4 1.r• yn. s.' gMr t ; y Y f r;r1 'yam . 7' e,,[,. ,n r, r:;,.,, ?tt','.1 .M.r.•l.:•'fit', : 1 a .iTiC7 x.'- 6iU GA\1 Q,1-:'C' 'b1Q'r,iAtr'-6''."', ihJ. .. i c {- q2 e,,,,yy,.,' .. F y .' 5,'-i`! ' i: 1Y. t ."t::C--'$ !.}xWA!!!+,`1fi.4 tlnSr'%..,;...,''`:' :,nx.,', ti.r :;5; } No. .]. .'according to 'plat:;,re`corded' in-.vn ume: 17':1 Of=:a C} ; :` , page 74 in King Count Washin for EX EPT:. 1¢w` portion .o•f; Block 38: conveyedl'.- r,n{a...,. deed<".recorded ider ' ty '•'iT;. W .fin 6.+.torn•„ fora State; Hi>:h;:.ayi by. 4. , r. a'fi:M,r..I•a.. { , tl. g. PI., L In•,i + t ({' ' {ifi:';, .:• i;i' Q,1` f:!i+.(F`na'L;H iirl"it.a; 'R :p5 p,1,tk. ditor. :s `fife: No' ' 5;52'565l, ':.toge`Cher`r;'w th.:;:.t os'e,'<.; ; ' portions of vacated.,.Thomas' .and Raymond` Avenues. S;or•, : T;a ;;:.ci.:.+.:; . pouthUTest 12th: Street adjoining tr.Vt :e4semen t'•!'over. :the -Southerl 30 :>feet•';'of;. sa L. r ` measured er 'endinular4. S T'°'toN.-. 'a, .y{.,_ - T.'. ' P P c, Y,_,.,,, 5.,;;.,,>'•,.,: '1 A, 'a" ':" .'•,"s i"teq hi: •2 .' f FAT=.#. O a e d 4 t there s <:- ' :`th`>5. ? s `jpL ,.'j:: " i':+ y'.. .. and.. WHEREAS, the owners of said described proper,ty. desire,. to provide a more pleasant and attractive pattern of construction and`..:. , appearance in ''-the development of said property, and.,:to harmonize"' such development'with -other business 'and industrial activa es at ':r-.! ;.' near, or in the vicinity of subject property;.: NOW, THEREFORE',:•=_the aforesaid owners,,hereby establish, grant .and impose;:restrictions.;' and covenants running' with the land as to the use, : present 'and', future,, of the' land her.einabove described. withrespect ,to thee.use• by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows.e`,; SETBACKS No buildings or structures shall be permitted or located,:' ;.' ' within, twenty (20) . feet of the north and south lines .of• ' the property hereinabove described. r LANDSCAPING The first ten (10) feet adjacent 'to the north and south lines of the'property hereinabove described shall be' appropriately landscaped .;and maintained continuously in a neat and F,clean. manner except for designated pedestrian and vehicular accessways. '.Such landscaping ' '.• ;,;;:';: is to be undertaken at such time the subject property is developed. bg:2 i'-N,;4>:;;* :: 4 NOl i:4'IU ' PACE:Fi U Lotto-O`Neil .Restrictive Covenants 5: ' ge 2, The remainder ofthe' setback area .not, required to 'be land- scaped.'may, be uti'l'ized .:for' off.-street:;parking purpos l'' ','' f;a s;°"3;5k:` .. 'ir, ti+;. rr rd. provided by the l.aWs and',,ordinances f'; Renton.o, the city: of ' SCREENING i.: T.. Tha outside storage o-f materials construction equipment , :i , i' ' r ,! ,I4."-_' S ti r;" ' '1 y:: t'''r' F' r,k" .?t'.,.{:,..° 8',s: r. ` p L • a - '.'. Y,>i 'b:.' Z'c` 1.. .Ct,, r„ r ri, Cr- supplies and containers shalh``be: "permitted wthiri',t..he,,,.. ;,.'11:;,; `;:` : ; ti:, i,storageA'larea ,of;rr;'the,: above,k;,described &.pFopety;:iproviaea, '. .:,,,µ,;:',f3 t'-;44.;, 0 4. s such storage area is screened' from .all: adjacent property '':':f';'••: w, 1'` . lines by a„ wall or view''obscuring fence not` less •than ` six (6) feet nor more ' than 'tenr` (10) feet. in height; such screening, to..be continuously maintained. in an attractive and ,peat manner a, Sc, Anyiolatio of f"any o these restrictivevnorbreach . cov:enants.`,;may;;: be ,."enforced 'by ,property legal procedures in ;the Superior' r" ...Y . i fytyN:" KingCountyb either the''City .of Renton: or anyro er.t .ow;ers ,,_`' ' y Y P P .Y adjoining subject property who are' adversely affected.?'by ;said .• ;f:''. breach. The ;aforesaid restrictive covenants supersedesupersede the.;prior Agreement';`;', s y; recorded in Auditor` s'".receiving No. 6649,440 and recorded' in'.Vol; ` 'g 356., page 483,0, M°. W. Lotto .. 7)7 ''' '' l''' APT "lliam J. O it r l.ly' i}5•,.!*,y 4 1} A Jam :f'.,,y*WASHINGTON I 2fG r' ' tx;E_L':rl ,I''et: 1' -'' '; befoge me p- rsonall : T, 4 ;1f'.. '' .finiVVs^ - a eared n/ a tii61/ t y0--- / Q.,,,' f`i.,a: a; the persona that executed tttosP regoing instrument;Q' kt:' .: 4i:i ,. f `,' P+L and acknowledged said. inst y t_free anal vol'untary,,' :i; :;,1ft,; 4deed ®f said erso 7V0 d'.'•purposes :therein F;;_:: ;:„, r;r' 4rito set 'my, h nd''. n "i • In.witness fwhe h a d'< y;, affixed my official' seal th first above;•written , , ,, ;', ate® y' , ; S;h Notary Public in',;and for:,the:_,-; g State" o shington, residing t is . .' ,_ . l`=. VOL' 461 PACE 650 STATE OF WASHINGTON, 1 SS. County of King On this day personally appeared before me M M. W. Lotto and Marj orie Lotto, his wife to me known to be the individual s described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and ackn vledgb0,'hat they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the4tpar $ek„therein mentioned. 1111""mde'rropy, hand and official seal this 31st day of August 19 70 Qo v e•h-®a :;.• ` { rotary Public in and for the State of Washington, GMENT, INDIVIDUALF. residing at Renton• y LJ RECOir0 4.61 re.cprcls Li SU 9 f\',1 10 00 4/0• 7 O O O O 112 i l 2;c.c•c G CITY OF RENTON Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton , Washington FROM: Office of City Clerk October 6, 1970 TO: Mr. Mike Lotto P. O. Box 2018, Highlands Sta. Benton, Wa. 9905 We are returning herewith original Agreement of Y.B. Investment Co. , recorded 6630068 Vol. Ul Page 541 , which was superseded, by Agreement recorded by No. 6649440 Vol. 356 Page 483, which was superseded by Declaration of Resriotive Covenants recorded by 6691361 Vol. 461 Page 648. Very truly, CITY OF RENTON Helmie Nelson City Clerk HN/m VOL , 311 PACE 541 TILED FOR RECORD BY SHELLAN,MN,STONE. & SWAN SON ATTORPJEYS AT LAW- 100 S..2rnd St. 1:dg. Y'`, P. 0. BOX 626 REWGN,'WASH 98055AGREEMENT WHEREAS the undersigned are the owners ; in fee title of the hereinbelow described property and said owners deem it advisable , in order to provide a more pleasant and attractive pattern of construction' ppdevelopment ,of,, said, property and to: harmonizeI.,• r,,,; , and .aappearance in, the•y.;,, such development with other business and industrial activities at, near, or in the vicinity of subject property; NOW' THEREFORE " The undersigned M. W. LOTTO , and MARJORIE LOTTO, his wife, and', WILLIAM J. O 'NEIL and' VIOLA T. O 'NEIL, his 'wife,'" d/b/a M. B. INVESTMENT COMPANY, hereby agree and, covenant , which' said covenant shall run with the land for the term hereinbelow stated, that no structure or building, including accessory building or buildings , shall be constructed or located within thirty (30) feet of the existing boundary of FAT #405 , abutting the undersigneds ' 'premises described as follows : . All Blocks 38 and ,39,, C. D.. ',Hillman' s. Earlington Gardens Addition 'to •the City of Seattle ," Division. No. 1, according to, plat recorded in volume' '17 of plats , page 74,. in King County, Washington',' EXCEPT that portion of Block 38 conveyed to the State of Washington for State Highway by deed. recorded under auditor' s file No.' 5525661; all situate in Renton, King County, Washington It !being further agreed and covenanted that twenty ( 20) feet, of' the ', aforesaid set-back provision shall be maintained in, an appropriate manner as a planting or screening strip , and such plantings to', contain, among others , shrubs and trees, , the minimum height of 'latter to be not less than ten (10) feet The ,aforesaid restrictions are covenants running with the land and shall remain in full foce and effect until December 31, 1980, at which• time' said covenant and any and all' obligations arising there- under shall terminate and end in all respects 1- r va ,31 ' PAG'542 Any prior changes or modifications shall first have the written approval of the City .of Renton, a Municipal Corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF we have hereunto set our hands this ' 5 day of February., ''19 7 0 . 70re,;). / ....e.--.,) ' , M. W. Lotto j 1il .10,1.-4 s--findt Marjorie Yotto . t„. „,,..(%),,„_..„..._ __Q,,(___,,,____e_„____ William J Neil r f Viola T O 'Neil. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF KING On this day personally'' appeared before me M.. W. LOTTO:''and, MARJORIE ;LOTTO , his wife and WILLIAM J . 0 'NEIL, and, VIOLA, T., O 'gEI'L,, ' , his wife, to be known , to be the individuals described in : and 'who• , executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that 9°ira theyt. signed ,the same as their free. and volunary act' and'de,,c- 0t; efg,«,!,; `e the uses and purposes .therein',mentioned. g '40t r' ° '•' 4,°.'. '. i-h'.y` i?' % m tti;; C c,C,'.; ,may GIVEN under my hand and official seal this' ' J d ''>' . i 'eb ; , w , ,4,p,p 19 7 0 . i <-', Notary\P.,tblic in, and for th ,:S, ate.- of Washington, residing at c;6 SS COUNTY OF NYE On this dayperso_naliy appeared before me 'J'WILLIAM J. 0?NEIL and VIOLA T. OBPEIL,, his wife, to he known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this 2f5th day of February, 1970 OFFICIAL SEA r 4 FFIC BURGHSEAL NO°J'r:" i'UP' IC n.a.n .' fro re STATIn a' 14..,...__a OF' p EV D1' OOU NYE re,, .(I.YYa-'NOTARY PUBLIC NEVADA J 9 OF PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN t t Ben',ittr, aeY* da NYE COUNTY t E , •r M I(o, 19 70 a:0q PyCommission ,Expirs Oct. 30, ;71 Filed for Record a9 Request of,d,,< Pa.t;, ,J EDW RD 1 LOGAN, Recorder 4 OF R Q THE RENTONNTN CITY COUNCIL MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • BA 8.3310 A 0 97yspO4'T CAPI7AX0 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council September 28, 1970 FROM: Community Services Committee SUBJECT: Committee Report Restrictive Covenants--W. C. Siegelman Appl. No. R-.210-64, Rezone from GS-1 to B-1 Property located on SW Grady Way between Thomas and Raymond Avenues SW The Community Services Committee, as requested by the City Council, has met with the developer, and the covenants previously filed have been revised with regard to setbacks, landscaping and screen- ing requirements (note attached copy) . The Community Services Committee recommends that the covenants as revised be accepted by the City Council since such covenants would be in keeping with the best public interest and general welfare of the City of Renton, and that the property be rezoned to B-1 as requested. ' cc: Bruce McKay, Vice Chairman Earl Clymer Charles Shane Richard Stredicke 41-01.0 ,4P 6 .6 f/ .7( I r wfn , J•• - 1 1 s w— m — 1i W. C . Siegelman Rezone : GS-1 to B-1 In 1 s' s' lit I O I 11 I rllhl R. _ J1 IIIIIII I I" jlllllll, l tiC f S A I L N li PACIFIC tiL IIII_dN t4i-I-- o 91 IUI Illi1111'10 !1 o TN°' I iiiii11 riiii.i", IIIrii'U * ., I QIIII II I R— ,i1;111f:J UIIII+ y• lyll • J IIIIII :SJ-, •.mil11! r i . f 11;,, a 4 ill IIIUI/ I' aU1t•il'Ilq ;-rl'""t, .; glllll Ililu>.f` r,'s l i,l l IU: .! ..!'lillllllla l y r•, slims ' I:t I'; Itipa! i' , h IIIIII Imo, 1 1=--.-=? {: r..... r.„1.. v, I' 1 fib:.. i IL'171m1 ! tA 1, r.r.,„,....,..2 . ,..ii ___ ,_ . ,,..,,.......,....p...„ t_o_.....: Z----I IIIIHel.• -,.hlillij` 4,1....Sri 1i131 J.JI,ilr r 'l..I1 %j 1111111 I ,,..„„, ^,,.„,,„ ,,„ T.:: y r=__-r .1 r-- _ 1 I ii t l ilD. 1 111JU1J uJ11L,1r1!J_ W i_-_ F i -,_ „iv_--lW, y 4 i alria, ti—T -- - --; '.- 1 : Y l I 3-. S 1- . i_... ,.. i--_J r' _1 _J I ____ 11- _i r___y___1 __ I•Z ' R 1 III -- L _I I___ O___-_I I_ I '" _ F 11 Y i pi - I 1Q--.-Ir--1WI-_-I F___-,, 31-r_T_ Z. __ T '-_ • :_ I.r_ -_4lW1-_-,- I-.-1Qi---1 I `- ,' + 1 H WRY MEADER DONATION CLAIM t ' k4. 0B ! zu K.is r U m L i til at COUNCIL REFERRAL y HEARING DATE June 24 , 1970 f' w li APPLICANT W . C . Siegelman FILE NO. R- 210-64 t LOCATION Between SA. Grady Way and F . A. I . 405 between Raymond V ip Avenue S .W . and Thomas Avenue S .W. (not open) I TQTAL AREAapprox. • 3 aer" s PRINCIPAL ACCESS S .W . Grady Way _ _ EXISTING ZONING GS-1 EXISTING USE Undeveloped w PROPOSED USE Commercial c COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Light Industrial or Manufacturing Park 3 COMMENTS i li II I if s r - ii September 22, 1970 Mr. M. W. Lotto P. 0. Box, 2018, Highlands Branch Renton, Washington 98055 Re: W. C. Siegelman,' Appl. No. R-210-64 Rezone from GS-1, to B-1. Property located on SW Grady Way between Thomas: and Raymond Avenues SW Dear Mr. Lotto: With reference .to the above noted pending rezone applica- tion, . attached 'is the original of your .Declaration of Restrictive Covenants recorded under Auditor's File No. 6691361. Copies of this document have been made for City. of Renton files. The rezone application will be presented to. the City Council for its consideration at the Council meeting of September 28, 1970. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director Encl. : U PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RENTON,WASHINGTON z A O MUNICIPAL BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • BA 8-3310 9 ySp° Rr CAPITA 0 SSE July 20 , 1970 The Honorable Avery Garrett, Mayor Members of the City Council Renton, Washington c,,/°7 U Re: W. C. Siegelman, Appl. No. R-210-64 (1964) ; rezone from GS-1 to B-1; property located between FAI. 405 and SW Grady Way, westerly of Raymond Ave. SW Gentlemen: The Planning Commission, in accordance with the referral from the City Council, has completed its review of the above noted application and submits the following recom- mendation: It was moved and seconded that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council take the action necessary on the W. C. Sie- gelman -application to complete the rezoning, from GS-1 to B-1; however, the Planning Com mission wishes to advise City Council that. it is its recommendation that it would be desirable if the restrictive covenants on subject property were to include a twenty- foot building setback from Grady Way SW, with ten feet of said setback to be main- tained as a landscaping strip. " Motion carried unanimously. Very truly yours , Gordon fir' Frioksen . Plannyn% Director i i1,2A A , C,e,4) . fTe1(.6A/Luct-1--- ca' i 1, 1/1 -.)(5-71/6/i 4-.2''-/1 01'7 P.I C E F"PnE CITY Arl".1?0 RN ln.7. 0 RENTON AVA SHING rr 0.r.s; POST OFFICE BOX 626, 100 2ND STREET BUILDING, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ALPINE 5.8678 GERARD M. SHELLAN, CITY ATTORNEY JOHN X.,PAIN, JR., ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY June 10 , 1970 • Mr. Gordon Erickson Planning Director \ City Hall Renton, Washington Re : W. C. S,legelman Dear Gordon: This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated June 8 , 1970 and followed up by our telephone conversation of today regarding the above zbning matter from GS-1 to B-I. In looking over tlis file, it appears that the owners of the property made timely ' application for the rezoning in 1964 which application was approved by the Planning Commissibli-Ind the City Council. An Ordinance was prepared by our office in November of 1964 and submitted to the Council for action. At that time the matter apparently was held up because of some arengements between the Planning Commission and the Owners whereby 'latter would impose voluntary restrictions on the subject property. For some reason UNITM1Writt to the writer, these restrictions were not filed of record until May of 1970 , a lapse of almost six years-. I understand from you that in 1964 the City could not legally, under the facts of this. case , impose the restrictions but had to - rely on the voluntary action of the owners. That being the case , and in view of the fact that both the Planning Commission and the City Council,had approved this rezoning, it would appear quite conclusive that the property owner is entitled to his rezoning . This is further strengthened by the fact that the City could not then have legally enforced. these restrictive covenants and we frankly do whether this six year delay was due to the reluctance of the owner to execute them or the City's failure to press the matter. I further understand from you, as per our telephone conversation that there is no conflict in the present Comprehensive Land Use with the rezoning to B-1. Your letter seemed to indicate differently but since the Comprehensive Plan shows a Light Industry Use, a B-1 zoning would not be incompatible in veiw of the 0 py Mr. Gordon Erickson Page 2 June 10 , 1970 fact that our Ordinance': allowssuch uSe in a Light Industry area. Furthermore, the B-1 zoning would be more restrictive;than: • the L-1 but this is a matter that the property owner should be concerned about and it might even be to his best interest to have petitioned for a L-1 zoning. If that were the case, he would have to re-apply and go through the whole procedure again. If Si6gelman' s request to B-I remains unchanged , it is our opinion that he is entitled to the rezoning without further delay. In conclusion, we would suggest that some kind of time limit procedure be set up to eliminate situations like the present one where the property owner undoubtedly assumed that his property had been rezoned six years ago. The owner should he notified that the ordinance is held up pending certain other actions to be performed by the owner with a time limitation established so as to avoid any misunderstandings . If we can be of any further help to you, please let us know. We remain Yours very truly, Gerard M. Shellan City Attorney GMS:nd APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE IN THE CITY OF RENTON FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. : D.- 6/7 Sec . - Twp. --R . Date of Filing: 1 st Area Map: Plan. .Comm. Action: Kroll Page: Date: ip., _. d _ City Councils. Action: 9-, 77 Date: Ord, No . APPLICANT TO ANSWER ALL THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS NEATLY & ACCURATELY: Box765j, Soap Iaake,_Washington Name of Applicant W..G. SIEGEIMAN & Orfa his wife ddress XXaQ 3to Telephone No . None Grady Way) Property Petitioned for rezoning is situated on S. S. Highway No. l-1, Street, between 83rd Avenue South Street and 84th,_Avenue_South Street. Legal :De-scription of Subject Property All Blocks 38 and 39 , .C.• D.. Hillman ' s Earlington• Gardens Addition to the City_ of _Seattle , _Iliuisn=..: :: .,=:-";ji No . 1, ' according to plat recorded in volume 17 of 1 , plats , page 74, in King County, Washington , EXCEPT that portion of Block 38 conveyed to -the State of 1 Washington for State Highway by deed recorded under auditor 's file No. 5525661; together with those portions of vacated Thomas and Raymond Avenues S,: W. and Southwest 12th Street adjoining: subject to a utility easement over the Southerly 30 feet of said L _ Block 38 measured perpendicularly -to.. the northerly -_ margins of FAI #405 and Southwest• l3th Street. Existing. Zoning Zoning Requested B-i What are the uses you propose to develop on this property? Automobile Business. Number of permanent off-street parking spaces that will be provided on this property? Major portion display parking. Number required NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information you desire to submit to substantiate your request may be attached to these sheets . 1 . In what way is this proposed change in zoning in the public interest? Additional retail outlet. 2. On what basis is there a real need in this community for more zoning of the type you request? Such acreage is needed to operate a business. 3. Do you consider the property involved in this application to be more suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone than for the uses permitted in the present classifica- tion? Please explain.YeS. 4. What provision would you make to protect adjacent and surrounding properties from the detrimental effects of any uses permitted in the proposed zone? Under requested zoning, we feel no detrimental effects would result. AFFIDAVIT W. C. Siegelman and e are WE Z, Orfa Siegelman being duly sworn, declare that I mmc the owner of property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowl- edge and belief. Subscribed and sworn to me this Z9Aay of l 9 196 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, r it},6k(11,e-i7Ii.,z-i ._ i . ` ( dae' 4, AC ame of weer 0=" y rlae` ri at PAK ' OtSomuLa Washington `1 0.'1 .--: Mai ing Address FVIAS40 17 :,Sea Lake Washington A rerss ty State) None Telep}ione) OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspec- ted by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in. every par- ticular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Planning De- partment governing the filing of such application. f 7 Date received C -C7 19 B f ,, Y 7 7"' Renton Planning Commission Meeting July 8 , 1970 Minutes - Page 4 CITY COUNCIL REFERRALS b) W. C. SIEGELMAN, Appl. No. R-210-64 (1964) ; rezone from GS-1 to B-1; property located between FAI 405 and SW Grady Way, westerly of Raymond Ave. SW (this application was approved by the Planning Commission and City Council in 1964 but was not consummated by ordinance pending the filing of a restrictive covenant by the property owner) --Planning Commission study and recommendation requested (continued from June 24, 1970) The Chairman described the Council referral and stated the matter was continued from the last meeting as the staff was endeavoring to contact the owner with respect to additional restrictive covenants pertaining to setbacks and landscaping on Grady Way. The Assistant Planning Director read a memo from the staff which stated that in answer to a letter from the Planning Director, Mr. M. W. Lotto phoned the office on July 7 , 1970 and indicated he had been out of town. With reference to addi- tional restrictive covenants pertaining to setbacks from Grady Way, Mr. Lotto stated he would prefer that the rezone go through with the restrictive covenants already filed, and that he would be reluctant to revise them. The City Attorney, in a letter dated June 10, 1970, had stated that in view of the facts of present case, it is his opinion that the property owner is entitled to his rezoning. This let- ter was reviewed by the Assistant Planning Director for Com- mission information. It was also determined that the restric- tive covenants already on file impose the same restrictions as those applying to the property to the west of subject property. Commission members were generally agreed that setback require- ments from Grady Way and landscaping -would be desirable in the area. MOVED BY DENZER, SECONDED BY BOWDEN, THAT THE HEARING BE CLOSED. MOTION CARRIED. ACTION: MOVED BY DENZER, SECONDED BY BOWDEN, THAT THE PLANNING COMMIS- SION RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL TAKE THE ACTION NECESSARY ON THE W. C. SIEGELMAN APPLICATION TO COMPLETE THE REZONING FROM GS-1 TO B-1 ; HOWEVER, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WISHES TO ADVISE CITY COUNCIL THAT IT IS ITS RECOMMENDATION THAT IT WOULD BE DESIRABLE IF THE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS ON SUBJECT PROPERTY WERE TO INCLUDE A TWENTY-FOOT BUILDING SETBACK FROM GRADY WAY SW, WITH TEN FEET OF SAID SETBACK TO BE MAINTAINED AS A LANDSCAPING STRIP. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The Chairman requested the Assistant Planning Director to research the question of a time limitation on the filing of restrictive covenants and report back to the Commission with a recommendation as to how this could be handled. c) PROPOSED STREET VACATION, BURNETT AVE. S. AND S. 8TH ST. Planning Commission review and recommendation requested (City Council public hearing on this matter set for July 20, 1970) The Assistant Planning Director displayed a plan showing the proposed vacation. The petitioner is Puget Sound Power and Light. The Chairman stated he believed this matter was a follow-through on certain commitments made by the city with reference to trading of rights-of-way between the city and MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission Chairman DATE: July 7 , 1970 FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Siegelman Rezone (M. W. Lotto) In answer to a letter from the Planning Director, Mr. M. W. Lotto phoned the office today and indicated that he had been out of town. With reference to additional restrictive covenants pertain- ing to setbacks from Grady Way, Mr. Lotto stated he would prefer that the rezone go through with the restrictive covenants already filed , and that he would be reluctant to revise them. June'- 29`;'"197,•0''._::i M 7812. s :` . = : tot o n' d.':-W ll am'•_J,:',O'aNeil.•' esr : M W. 'Lttan Sunnycr es Rooad= Sea tle''; _Washingn ARe •W ' C iegelman, ppl:,• ' . arty- . .froS-1 .to 8=1s: proPRezone ' m d `:WaY 'between:Thomas. located :on SW :Gra a id :Raymond :,Ait s SW _ t- Gen 1 men::t e The ..' .:'ng.•'Commission:;reviewed :'the :above. noted: `appli, cation- at -'its:`;`meeting:of: June 2A,. 197.0.:- The .'Commies on raised;_sever-al questions'=;-with. reference to setbacks and ;;' ' '' - '. ., : :::-.,,. .:-, landscaping; along. Grady::Way' in.'addition:' to;the;,'covenants alread. filed:.: - It.-:is' requested;;that;,-:you:;contact• this department so'„that we .may' arrange `a'.meeting? to:,dis_cuss thef questions:-raised' a by:the', Commission` i-n;``detail .prior- to =the July..''.5:,,. ,1970•: meeting'',of''.the Planning ,Commission: I.,.::- V rul,y' urseyy,•t yo Gordon: Y:' Ericksen'' r:::. Plann`in' Director t , Renton Planning Commission Meeting June 24 , 1970 Minutes - Page 5 ACTION: MOVED BY BOWDEN, SECONDED BY FORGAARD, THAT THE PLANNING COM- MISSION RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE APPLICA- TION OF H . C. ANDERSON AND REINHARD DISTRIBUTION COMPANY FOR REZONE FROM G TO B-1 ; SUCH REZONING WOULD BE IN AGREEMENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL - REACTIVATED REZONE APPLICATION c) W. C. SIEGELMAN, Appl. No. R-210-64 (1964) ; rezone from GS-1 to B-1 ; property located between FAI 405 and SW Grady Way, westerly of Raymond Ave. SW (this application was ap- proved by the Planning Commission and City Council in 1964 but not consummated by ordinance) --Planning Commission review and recommendation requested The Chairman described the City Council referral . Commission comments were invited. Sterling stated that since the Planning Director is in the process of contacting the applicant with reference to additional covenants based on the change of zon- ing in this area during the last few years, that the Commission should defer any recommendation on this referral until the next meeting . ACTION : MOVED BY STERLING, SECONDED BY DENZER , THAT THE COUNCIL REFERRAL PERTAINING TO THE SIEGELMAN REZONE APPLICATION BE CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF JULY 8 , 1970. MOTION CARRIED. 5 . ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS a) CITY COUNCIL REFERRALS 1) Proposed Street Vacation, Burnett Ave. S . and S. 8th Street--Planning Commission review and recom- mendation requested 2) Proposed Revision to Zoning Ordinance, Sec . 4-710 , pertaining to P-1 Zone--Planning Commission review and recommendation requested The Planning Director described the above referrals briefly and stated more detailed information would be presented to the Commission at the Administrative Meeting of July 8 , 1970. b) Annual Election of Planning Commission Officers ACTION: MOVED BY STERLING, SECONDED BY FORGAARD, THAT THE ANNUAL ELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICERS BE DEFERRED UNTIL JULY 8 , 1970 DUE TO THE ABSENCE OF TWO COMMISSION MEMBERS. MOTION CARRIED . As there was no further official business before the Planning Commission, it was MOVED BY FORGAARD, SECONDED BY DENZER, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. MOTION CARRIED . The meeting was adjourned at 10 : 30 p.m. June 18, 1970 Messrs. M. W. Lotto and William J. O'Neil M. B. Investment Company c/o Shellan, Pain, Stone & Swanson . Renton, Washington :98055 Re.: W. C. Siegelman,. Appl. No. R-210-64 Rezone from GS-1 to B-1; property located on SW. Grady Way between Thomas and Raymond Avenues SW Gentlemen: With reference to the above-noted rezone application, the. Renton City Council has. referred the matter' to the Planning Commission for study and recommendation in view of the time that has elapsed since the original filing .date of. October. 5, 1964.. This matter "will be considered by the Planning Commis- sion at its Public,:Hearing Meeting:.of .June" 24, 1970, Council Chambers, Renton Municipal Building," starting at 8:00 p.m. If you have any-;questions 'regarding this matter, please contact this department® Very truly_ yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director Renton Planning Commission Meeting June 10, 1970 Minutes - Page 2 was noted that should the street not be vacated, the property owner constructing the apartment complex would be required to develop Whitman Court NE to city standards with streets, side- walks, curbs and gutters , which development would be more costly than payment of one-half of the appraised value of the property to be vacated as a fee for said vacation. Due to these factors , the Planning Commission was divided in its opinion regarding the proposed vacation and felt it could not make a recommendation to Council without further informa- tion. The Planning Director noted that the public hearing on the proposed vacation has been scheduled by the City Council for June 22, 1970--two days before the next Planning Commission meeting. ACTION: MOVED BY ROSS, SECONDED BY DENZER, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION CONTINUE CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION FOR THE VACATION OF WHITMAN COURT NE TO JUNE 24 , 1970 . Following additional dis- cussion on the matter, MOTION CARRIED. The Chairman requested the Planning Director at the City Council public hearing on June 22nd to express some of the reservations of the Commission on this proposed vacation and the Commission' s reluctance to make a recommendation as the Commission felt it lacked sufficient information on the general traffic pattern in the vicinity. The Planning Director indicated he would do so and would also discuss the Commission' s thoughts with the Traffic Engineer. 4. ITEMS OF BUSINESS CONTINUED FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERA- TION AT PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF JUNE 24, 1970 : REZONE APPLICATION a) ANDERSON, H. C. AND REINHARD DISTRIBUTION CO. , Appl. No. R-649-70 AMENDED; rezone from G to B-1; property located on NE corner of Rainier Ave. S. and S. 7th St. (continued from May 27 , 1970) , The Planning Director stated there were no new developments with reference to subject application. The applicant has amended the application to include all of his property pres- ently zoned G and the matter was continued from the last meeting so that the amended application could be re-advertised. Subject application will be considered on June 24 , 1970 . CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL - REACTIVATED REZONE APPLICATION b) W. C. SIEGELMAN, Appl. No. R-210-64 (1964) ; rezone from GS-1 to B-1; property located between FAI 405 and SW Grady Way, westerly of Raymond Ave. SW (this application was approved by the Planning Commission and City Council in 1964 but not consummated by ordinance) --Planning Commission study and recom- mendation requested (continued from May 27, 1970) The Planning Director stated that in view of the discussion on this matter at the last meeting, a letter was sent to the City Attorney requesting his review and opinion of the following questions raised by the Planning Commission: 1. Is the Siegelman application still valid? 2. Could the Planning Commission stand on its previous action of 1964 due to the change in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan? Renton Planning Commission Meeting June 10 , 1970 Minutes - Page 3 3. Could the application (if valid) be amended to agree with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan? 4 . Would the application (if valid) have to be readvertised and another public hearing held before the Planning Commission? The Planning Director then read the City Attorney' s reply which stated that in view of the fact that both the Planning Commis- sion and the City Council had approved this rezoning in 1964 ; and at that time the City could not legally impose restrictions but had to rely on the voluntary action of the owners , that the property owner is entitled to his rezoning. With reference to the conflict with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the Plan shows a Light Industry use and a B-1 zoning would not be in- compatible as the zoning ordinance allows the B-1 use in the L-1 District. If the applicant wishes to change his applica- tion to L-1, he would have to reapply and go through the whole procedure again. If the B-1 request is unchanged, it is the City Attorney' s opinion that the applicant is entitled to the rezoning. At the Commission' s request, the Planning Director explained the substance of the restrictive covenants filed by the prop- erty owner pertaining to setbacks and landscaping to the effect that no structure or building shall be constructed or located within 30 feet of the existing boundary of FAI 405; and further that 20 feet of the aforesaid setback provision shall be main- tained in an appropriate manner as a planting and screening strip consisting of shrubs and trees. These covenants run with the land until December 31, 1980. This matter will be considered by the Planning Commission on June 24 , 1970 . 5 . NEW ITEMS OF BUSINESS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION AT PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF JUNE 24, 1970 : SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION a) KAMPE CONSTRUCTION CO. , Appl. No. SP-652-70; special permit to allow apartment use in R-2 zone; property located on Monroe Ave. NE between NE 12th St. and Sunset Blvd. NE The Planning Director pointed out property location on the zoning map and noted that originally the property owner had requested R-3 zoning. After public hearing, this request was denied by the Commission. R-2 zoning was granted on appeal to City Council. A plan of the proposed apartment develop- ment was displayed. This matter will be considered at the public hearing meeting of June 24 , 1970 . SITE PLAN APPROVALS b) AERO DYNE CORP. , Appl. No. SA-651-70; request for site plan approval in P-1 zone; property located on Airport Way between Shattuck and Logan Aves. SW The Planning Director noted that applicant wishes to construct two new hangars including office and storage space under lease arrangement from the Airport Board. Slides of the area were shown. In a letter dated June 8 , 1970, the applicant has requested Planning Commission consideration of the site plan approval request at the meeting of June 10th due to business commit- ments. OF v ti 0 Z OFFICE Ob' TIIJ ('ITV ATTORNEY • RENTON,\VASIIINGTON rn o POST OFFICE BOX 626, 100 2ND STREET BUILDING, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ALPINE 5-8678 o 9 3' GERARD M. SHELLAN, CITY ATTORNEY 9tiSo tiZ' JOHN K. PAIN, JR., ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY June 10 , 1970 QI CAPITAL- OE Mr. Gordon Erickson Planning Director City Hall Renton, Washington Re : W. C. Siegelman Dear Gordon: This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated June 8, 1970 and followed up by our telephone conversation of today regarding the above zoning matter from GS-1 to B-1. In looking over - his file, it appears that the owners of the property made timely application for the rezoning in 1964. which application was approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council. An Ordinance was prepared by our office in November of 1964 and submitted to the Council for action. At that time the matter apparently was held up because of some ar> .ngements between the Planning Commission and the Owners whereby latter would impose voluntary restrictions on the subject property. For some reason unbeknownst to the writer, these restrictions were not filed of record until May of 1970 , a -lapse -of almost six years . I understand from you that in 1964 the City could not legally, under the facts of this case, impose the restrictions but had to rely on the voluntary action of the owners . That being the case, and in view of the fact that both the Planning Commission and the City Council had approved this rezoning , it would appear quite conclusive that the property owner is entitled to his rezoning . This is further strengthened by the fact that the City could not then have legally enforced these restrictive covenants and we frankly do not know whether this„six year delay was due to the reluctance of the owner to execute them or the City' s failure to press the matter. I further understand from you, as per our telephone conversation that there is no conflict in the present Comprehensive Land Use with the rezoning to B-1. Your letter seemed to indicate differently but since the Comprehensive Plan shows a Light Industry Use , a B-1 zoning would not be incompatible in veiw of the Mr. Gordon Erickson Page 2 June 10 , 1970 fact that our Ordinance allows such use in a Light Industry area. Furthermore, the B-1 zoning would be more 'restrictive *than the L-1 but this is a matter that the property owner should be concerned about and it might even be to his best interest to have petitioned for a L-1 zoning . If that were the case , he would have to re-apply and go through the whole procedure again. If Sie_gelman' s request to B-1 remains unchanged , it is our opinion that he is entitled to the rezoning without further delay. In conclusion, we would suggest that some kind of time limit procedure be set up to eliminate situations like the present one where the property owner undoubtedly assumed that his property had been rezoned six years ago. The owner should be notified that the ordinance is held up pending certain other actions to be performed by the owner with a time limitation established so as to avoid any misunderstandings . If we can be of any further help to you, please let us know. We remain Yours very truly , erard` M. (Shellan City Attorney GMS :nd Gerard 14.. :Shellan, 'City' 'Attorney Renton,: Washington '9:805.5 Res'- T•. ;C: •Segelman, .request :for from :GS-1 . 'to B-i; :Appl-: :No:' R-210=:64; property located.` between FAI'.:405 and SW, f-Grady Way, westerly o -; - Raymond Ave.''SW Dear..Jerry s,, The 'City Council, •by'its' action' of May 25, 1970., "referred: '. the .Siegelman;'rezone application to' the.'Planning `Commission . -. for review °and' recommendation.• The :reason for the .:referral. was the period of time which has elapsed between,_>the origi-. nal dates of` the.' Planning::Commission ,and ,CityCouncil :actions and:''the:'•completien.,'of: the action on the rezone ordinance.Public, hearing before the Planning .Commission .was'.: conducted .; , .. wand. the application as' recommended for approval to :the -.City Council :subject to ;the' filing; :of_..an'':agreement. pertaining; to setbacks,.:,.landscaping :and.:screening. The City,..Council con-' I curred ,in' the 'recommendation 'of the Planning-'Commission and `., referred the :matter to the;'Law-and: Ordinance'; Committee.; _• ": Final •approval:Of:: the'Ordinance :-wa.s contingent upon: ;the '= filing of the''agreement`, which was'not recorded•until May 19 7 0,. The Planning .Commission:.atthis `time hat.,'-raised.".the_-=•question as' -to the legality of the application in view,•`o:f''.the.,`,time elapsed since the original filing Of October 5-, ;1964. ,Since the .date of the:;original;,fili'ng, thee Comprehensive:;Land,Use. Plan has •been revised, and•.;thfe application -is :in,.:conflict , :with the proposed:.use- of-''the :area,,in 'question.- The:,Commis= sion. Chairman questions`whether ,or:,not the 'Commission in fact, .;act upon 'the', application due' 'to the present. .coil- flict.:With. the ;Comprehen-sive. Land. Use ;Plan. The:`Planning Commission requests your' review:and opinion`'as:. = = to what legal.,avenues`-the Commission can at this -time- pursue. Basically:'-: the,.Comiri sshas:: raised: the following questions : t Mr. Gerard. M . Shellan: June 8', :19.T0. Page= 2 . 1.. Is:. the Siegelman :application ,still' valid? 2._.: : Could .the P!anning, .Commis,Sion stand on previous;action'-of,-1964'';,due: to the change ' in.• the :Comprehensive:.Land.Use Plan?.• 3 Could;-the.application`- (if"valid) be amended to; agree'"with;:the 'Comprehensive -Land' Use :, :- '' . •' ' Plan?' 4`. -Would the:.application::(i f. ,valid)., have2-,to lie. - = readvertised and, another: public hearing.. - held before:: the',Planning:'Commission? Very truly. yours.. • Gordon Y. Ericksen• Planning .Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON JUNE 24 1970 , AT 8 : 00 P .M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1. REZONE FROM G TO B-1; property located NE corner Rainier Ave. S. and S. 7th St. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: . Portion of"Govt•:' ,Lot' 16 in Sec. 18 , ,.Twp'23N,,' R` 5E,, W:'M: lying easterly of State Highway No. 5, ,west of Shattuck- ' Ave. S. , south of the :centerline of S. . 6th St. produced westerly, and north of the north line of . S. 7th St. ;, less the•, east 120, ft:.;'"'less the. ;north 180 ft. subject . '' to easementfor Bonneville Power Administration' s trans mission line R/W, 2. REZONE FROM GS-1 TO B-1; property located on SW Grady Way between Thomas and Raymond Aves. SW. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 4\* qe` m as'\ All 'Blocks 38 and 39 , C . D. Hillman'' s Earlington ;, Gardens :Adoi cion. to the City. of Seattle, Division -, No : 1, ' according ,to plat recorded in. volume 17 of, plats , page 74 ,. in' King. County, Washington , EXCEPT that portion ' of. Block 38 ' conveyed to th State of Washington for State Highway by deed. recorded under''. : auditor ' s file No. `'5525661; together with those portions of vacated Thomas and Raymond Avenues S . W. . `.'.•. and Southwest 12th Street adjoining: subject to .a , •' utility easement ..over. the Southerly 30 feet of said Block''.3:$ measured perpendicularly :to, the. .northerlyi margins of. FAI J405, and Southwest ,13th ;Street: . 3. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR APT. USE IN R-2, ZONE; property located on Monroe Ave. NE between NE 12th St. and Sunset Blvd. NE. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots. 3,and 4 in.nook 1 of SHEPARD HEIGHTS ADDITION TO RENTON, as per plat_recorded , , in Volume 46 of Plats, Page' 79, Records of King County, Washington and that portions' `;,. of the East z of the Southeast 4 of the Southwest'4' of Section' 4; Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.. described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east •line of said Southwest 4,: North 1° 16' 12" East 163.15 feet of' the Southeast corner : ' thereof, the true point of beginning, thence North 10 16° 12" East, 326.75, feet, thence North, 880 53' 08" West 114.00 feet, thence southerly to a point,lying North 88° 55' 33" West 112.00 feet from the true point of beginning; ,thence South 88° 55' . 33" East .112.00 feet to ,the,,;;': ;; ' true point of beginning. ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON JUNE 24 , 1970 AT 8 : 00 P .M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO SAME . JOHN C. STERLING, SECRETARY PUBLISHED June 10, 1970 RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION , CERTIFICATION I, Richard B. Hansen HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE , DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS—PLACES ON THE P OPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST ; Subscribed and sworn SIGN l/'lt` 2'•;74 r-I to before me, a Notary Public, on the +ILs. day of 19 -(U'. Renton Planning Commission Meeting May 27 , 1970 Minutes - Page 4 Y- (1) W. C. Seigelman, Appl. No. R-210-64 (1964) ; rezone from GS-1 to B-l; property located between FAI 405 and Renton Junction Way westerly of Raymond Ave. SW (this application was approved by the Planning Commission. and City Council in 1964 but not consummated by ordinance) Planning Commission study and recommendation requested The Planning Director presented a brief history of subject referral . He noted that Planning Commission and City Council approval in 1964 was based on the voluntary fil- ing by the applicant of restrictive covenants pertaining to setbacks and landscaping. No covenants were filed, and the application has lain dormant since that time. However, restrictive covenants were filed for record with the County Auditor' s office on May 20 , 1970, reactivating the application. Questions were raised regarding conformance with the Com- prehensive Land Use Plan, legality of the application it- self in view of the amount of time elapsed since original filing on October 5 , 1964 , whether or not the application should be republished and reposted. The Chairman stated this matter would be placed on the agenda for the next study session and asked the Planning Director to get an opinion from the City Attorney with respect to the legal avenues the Commission could pursue. This referral will be placed on the agenda for consideration at the public • hearing meeting of June 24 , 1970 . 2) Petition for Vacation of Whitman Court NE (.lying north of Honeydew Estates) --Planning Commission recom- mendation requested The Planning Director presented slides of the area for Commission information. The Chairman stated this matter would be placed on the agenda for the next study session. b) Landscaping Proposed under FAI 405 at Mill Avenue S. For Planning Commission information, the Planning Director displayed a plan worked out by the State Highway Department in conjunction with city departments for landscaping under FAI 405 at Mill Avenue S. The Highway Department will in- stall the landscaping, complete with sprinkling system, on the basis that the city will maintain the area. The Board of Public Works has reviewed this matter and has recommended that. the city accept the plan with the addition of a small sit-in park with bench and walkway. c) Study Session Date Following considerable. discussion on the subject of biweekly study sessions, it was decided to hold a study session follow- ing completion of the next regularly scheduled administrative meeting on June 10, 1970. The administrative meeting will convene at 7 : 30 p.m. Agenda for the study session will in- clude those matters continued from this session as well as a review of the Commission work program for 1970 and compila- tion of priorities for programs. As there was no further business before the Planning Commis- sion, it was MOVED BY DENZER, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. MOTION CARRIED. The meeting was adjourned at 10 : 00 p.m. 1 F K :.;,, j 4/ , ate O IiINAN• CE NO 1.1 i r /Jx'?:,' ';:'. / r '' Ar1 OTIOINANCE of E CITY off' TINTON I '•?ASHINGTON CI NG NG t l , ' i.;1j;i- -THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION O CERTAIN P:ROPE'.RTIES •?XThIN THE y1 '/ 1,, , f:;-°:.Ct OF RSNTON FROM "GBIIERAL •SUBU tJAN ~StDENCE DISTANT"., ' 7. l) I.?: Ir;, NE B-1)GS t TO RtISIN SS Ot$TiT1C lE 6 04 rf:rh ,tij f{ J-; / , tSIIE As under Chapter VII, title IV (Business Zegiflatigne) bf Ordinance No4 i628 kheiin as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City bii%enton". as amende i and the maps adii\tet1 iii conjunction therewith, the properties hereinbeloia%described . have hetittfbre Ise-" toneet as ditheral Shbiirbari :iesidefncd istrict (oS-4); and aG,f iERtAb a pr. .=t' petitA oat Eris Change of acnetilsssafieation of said properties •, had 1$eeft filed tAtii the e `ty 6h or about September 019640 which petitioh was then referred to the Ptahhaftg • .w.;i§®ioh for investiga ion, study and public hearingb ' and a ptihiic hearing hating an held thereon o or about October 28, 1964; ail piiriiiant to Mahe of heating .',',ttt published nd posted.as provided by later and said matter haoth chaff dti1 coitsiderao h the P"latiiiin g COMMission and all partieshaving t eel tieai d appearl€tg in support the. :of d ih oppasitioh thereto, NOt? TgiEaEFOaill BE It O.MiAINSb $Y TH MAYO2 P4UN CITY COUNCIL 0" TIlE CITY 0r RENTON, AS 00LtOt'S: SUCTION t.s The following deecri,,ei, parcel of property ih the CITY Ole RENTON is hereby retailed to Dusi;;ess bistri'•.t B-1) and the City Iiigiheer and the.Piannint Direetbi are hen g anthbrtzad a,,. n.irected to Change the taps of tt1e Zoning Ordinance; as ablencied/tee evtdehce said r z.•ni.ng: Sleek SO and that p` ioortof Block 38 of Co . 1•Ifdiman!s Eartington Gardens Add, No, li tying north of the Freest.:,„ SSCTIOI...II: T .s Ordinance shall be in full •s rce and effect froth"and ' after Its passage, aprbatat aitd legal publication, PASSEb HY i CITY oOUt Ctt this „__., . day of Noiiembe, 1964, ileliaie Nelson, Cit lark ' ,,.. APPR+,, .D BY Tilt MAYOR thia .- ..,..:•...• ..day o a berg, 1964. Donald W. Custer, Mayor APPROVED AS TO 0C1 1: Gerard M. Sheltem, City Att otney • Date `of tb`i$tationi. ,.... INTER-OFFICE MEMO t1.cittew.bor , 964DateA Rani() Vrio0,. C,447,Eacr% From Departmental Account No. j Taltz)$ City ktgperTo:Expenditure Account No. Message: Attaeloci hext.W axt 0:-.1*Cr.theal(m re:law.% 14)0 xvpooctri woacitoxt-) tiv. i'vt"-'4114, C Mr13PAY2 14411,4er Pat C(WOW% Wo 0* alogaran Ozbatfo, ta%azs, 0..tcxtt, 02,1 logclu e4k1 r.,,tu.11) V tlu). Clork16 C7r2::5.00* 1..7tact„,0 Nete.ot4 city cult Minutes of the Renton City Council Meeting 11-9-64 COMMUNICATIONS: (cont.) A letter read from Mr. Robert Spielman, 641 "N" Place appealed decision of the Planning Commission regarding request for variance from front and rear setback requirements, on irregularly shaped parcel of ground. Moved by Poli, seconded by Hulse, that next Monday, November 16, 1964 at 8:00 p.m. be set for hearing .on the appeal of Mr. Spielman. Carried. A letter read. from Planning Director J. David Jensen submitted Planning Commission recommendations from 'its public hearing meeting of 10-28-64 as follows: 1. Application R-207-64, Austin Company, 2930 - 4th Ave. So. rezone from G and GS-1 to L-1 subject. to setback, landscaping planting strip and dedication of road and utility easement which are standards adopted as minimum requirements for development of industrial uses in this area. Moved by'Hulse, seconded by Schellert, to concur in the Planning Commission recommendation with referral to the Law and Ordinance Committee following compliancewithrestrictivecovenants. ' Carried. . 2. Application R-208-64, Glacier Park and Great Northern Railway Companies rezone from G to L-1 with adequate setbacks from the West Valley Road, of propertieslyingwesterlyoftheUnionPacficandChicago, Milwaukee Railroad right-of-way, and rezone of the balance of the property from G to. H-1 with provision for development of standards along South 180th, the East Valley Hwy. and 88th Avenue South as proposed.Moved by Schellert:, seconded by Dahlquist, to concur in the recommendation of thePlanningCommission. Carried. Moved by Hulse, seconded by Poli, that upon cathpletion of the covenants the matter be referred to the Law, and Ordinance Committee for proper.Ordinance. Discussion ensued regarding ability to comply,where the streets are not yet established and_ the fact that the covenants •are upon the land and not retro- active once development has been achieved, the pending motion carried. 3 Application•R-209-64, Slavo Ozbolt rezone from S-1 to B-1 which constitutes a natural extension of existing business and zoning uses. Moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Poli, to •concur' in the recommendation, with referral to the Law & Ordinance Committee. Carried. 4. Application R-210-64, W. C. Siegelman rezone from 'GS-1 to B-1 with provisions that building setbacks from FAI 405 and landscape planting strip be applied on same basis as with properties lyinc to the West. Moved by Poli, seconded by Gianini, to concur in the recommendation with referral o the Law and Ordinance Committee. Carried. . 5. .ApplicationV-213-64, A.M.Roberts Variance to allow construction of addition to existing building at 308 Williams Street provided the payment be made to the Cityoftherequired ".in lieu of parking•fee". Moved by Schellert, seconded by Dahlquist, to concur in the recommendation. The motion carried.. A 'letter. read froth City Engineer, Wilson reported results of survey of all street lights within the City taken in May of this year which resulted as follows: 442 - 20,000'Lumen Mercury Vapor Lights on Puget Sound Power & Light Co. poles133 - 20,000 Lumen Mercury Vapor Lights on City of Renton poles 834 - 7,000 Lumen Mercury Vapor Lights Upon sale to' Puget Power of City owned fixtures - the 442 - 20,000 Lumen Lights, the City would own the 133 - 20,000 Lumen Lights as Puget Sound Power & Light Company now owns the 834. Mayor Custer advised he had requested this report that it might be forwarded to the Law and Ordinance Committee for attachment to the pending Resolution declaring the 442 fixtures surplus so that the sale thereof might proceed.Moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Bruce, to concur in the referral for attachment to the ,Resolution. Carried. A letter from City Engineer Wilson, signed also by Traffic Division Captain, Ernest E. Henry, Police Department recommended that the present traffic ordinance be amended in order that a 30 M.P.H. speed limit might be established on Puget Drive from 116th Avenue S.E. to the Talbot Road extension. Moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Schellert, to concur in the recommendation with referral to the Law and Ordinance Committee. Carried. 3- t ic,G k,en1.e n 10 . }= y `t.:_r.d,,1 ' WA S FA rg miGirtro Ail the Jet Transport Capital of the World ie%-:PLANNING DEPARTMENT k°r.sr_ G Y !. as1 I ',: 4 w• November 9 1964 J fdd, f i ,PAA' r ° P'41 : Honorable'Mayor Donald Custer L r - a Members of the .City Council Gentlemen: w ._ t The :Planning Commission at its public hearing October' 28 , ,1964 ; acted favorably upon the follow- ing items 1 Application i .--207-64 ,,. AUSTIN COMPANY: e`' { •64/_ The Planning •Comma ssion' recommends rezone -,, from G' 'and GS-1 to L-1 of properties as described:" in the .Application ,• subject to the ` owner' s accept= : ' ance of the following standards deemed necessary for the development of properties in this vicinity: V' . a: ' Building setbacks of 60 ' from FAIT• 405 and South 153rd Street. t b. Side; street setbacks of 30 ' . c.. Installation of "a landscaped planting s strip 2,0 ' in width encompassing the' entire property. d. Dedication of or an easement over the ' : South 15 ' of the property for roadway and utility purposes. The foregoing standards are those adopted . heretofore. by the Planning_ Commission and the Council as minimum requirement-s for development of industrial uses in this area. • 2 • Application R-208-64 , GLACIER PARK- AND GREAT , ' j•. NORTHERN 'RAILWAY COMPANIES . - C' ilti''J'''Y j The Commission recommends that the properties as described in the application and lying westerly 'of the Union Pacific and Chicago, Milwaukee Railroad right of ,way , be reclassified from G to L-1 , with ade- " quate' provis%,'gn for setivacks from the West ,,Val, ey Road , 1- November 9 , 1964 and further recommends that the balance of the proper- ties described in the application be rezoned from G . to H-1 with provision for development of properties to industrial park standards along South 180th Street , the East Valley Highway, and 88th Avenue South as proposed . 3 . Application R-209-64 , SLAVO OZBOLT: The Commission recommends rezone of the prop- erties as described in the application be rezoned from /1,—) S-1 to B-1. This constitutes a natural extension of existing business zoning and uses . 4 . Application R-210-64 , W. C. SIEGELMAN : The Commission recommends rezone of the prop- erties as described in the application from GS-1 to, B-1 with the provision that building setbacks from FAI 405 and landscape planting strip be applied On the same basis as applicable to the properties lying to the west. 5 . Application V-213-64 , A. M. ROBERTS : The Commission recommends that a Variance be granted to allow construction of an addition to an exis- ting building at 308 Williams Street , provided, the 'appli- cant pay to the. City the required "in lieu of parking , A fee" . The Council ' s concurrence in the foregoing recommen dations is respectfully requested. Yours very truly, J. Dav 'd Jensen Pahn . g Director JDJ:pc 2- Planning Commission October 28 , 1964 Page 2 2 ° Continued: Director' s report: Recommend approval of the request with the exceptions as contained in the Committee report , and with the further recommen- dations that setbacks of sufficient depth for industrial park stan- dards be established along South 180th Street and East Valley High- way and along 88th Avenue South and its proposed extensions Mr, Jensen pointed out the subject area on the map and explain- ed that setbacks would be very important along 88th Avenue South,whi is proposed as a major arterial ,,and also on South 180th and also on the East Valley Highway In the discussion that followed Mr, Boyd, Great Northern Rail- road representative, stated that one objection would be to the application of industrial park standards on the area between 88th and the West Valley Highway. He stated that excessive setbacks would not leave sufficient room for the building already proposed for this area: Mr. Boyd further outlined the Railroad' s plans for their pro— perties in the area. Generally, the areas to the west , including Tukwila, between the Railroad and the West Valley Highway would be for heavy industrial uses° The remainder would be for lighter in- dustrial or industrial park type uses. It was moved by Peretti, seconded by Denzer that the rezone be approved on the basis of the Committee and the Director' s rem ports , and that if necessary,modifications can be made at a later date, with adequate setback provisions on the East Valley Highway and South 180th° In the discussion on the motion, Mr. Jensen emphasized the importance of adequate setbacks on the major arterials in order to provide for future traffic circulation within the proposed in- dustrial district° Mr° Busch stated that he felt that some kind of plot plan should be worked out for this area. Mr. Felker stated that this would be understandably difficult until the property owners know what their building plans are to be° Question being called, the motion carried° 30 SLAVO OZBOLT: R-209-64 , request for rezone from S-1 to B-1 of cer- tain properties abutting upon Edwards Street as described in the Application. Committee and cDire .tor' s reports recommended approval of the request. Chairman Felker asked if there were any oral or written objec- tions to this rezone. There were none. Mr. Jensen stated that the rezone is requested for additional parking space in connection with the existing car wash business on the adjoining property. It was then moved by Denzer, seconded by RacanellD that the Committee and Director' s reports be accepted and that the Commission recommends to the City Council the granting of the rezone from. S-1 to B-1° Motion carried. 40) W. C. SIEGELMAN, R-210-64 , request for rezone from GS-1 to B-19 of Block 39 and that portion of Block 38 of C. D. Hillman' s Earlington Planning Commission October 289 1964 Page 3 Continued: Gardens Add° No. lag lying northerly of FAI 405 . 7 Committee report.: Recommend approval of the request with the provision that adequate setbacks be established from FAI 405 on the same basis applied to adjacent properties lying westerly. Director° s re ort : Recommend approval on the same basis as the committee report ° Recommend further that the development of this property would be in compliance with the proposed industrial park standards and recommends further that serious consideration should be given to the desirable probability of vacation of Streets and alleys lying westerly of 84th Avenue South. A letter was read from Mr° E. R° Coleman, representative for the applicant, stating that the applicant would not object to L-1 in place of the B-1 as requested, since the area is shown on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan as Light Industrial° Mr. Jensen stated that if the change is made to L-1 this would require reposting of the property and another hearing. After further discussion it was moved by Peretti, seconded by ' Denzer, to concur in the Committee and Director' s reports and re- commend to the City Council the rezone from GS-1 to B-1 as request- ed on the Application. Motion carried. 5° ROBERT No SPIELMAN, V-212-649 request for Variance to enlarge exist- ing house., and to waive front and rear yard requirements, 641 N Place. Committee report : Recommend denial of the request for Variance. Director' s report: Recommend that the rear yard variance request be granted° Chairman Felker asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak on this subject. The applicant , Mr. Spielman stated that he needed the additional room for his family, and that the front yard variance was necessary in order to provide for a carport. He felt that a hardship was involved in this case because of the limitations of the small lot . Chairman Felker stated that he did not think that this property could qualify under the terms of the ordinance as a hard- ship case. It was then moved by Peretti , seconded by Busch, that the request be denied. Roll call vote being called the results were as follows : Ayes" -T Wes Busch, James Denzer , John Racanello , Dr. Baird Bardarson , Louis Peretti. Nays" - Clark Teegarden, Dayle Garrison. The motion to deny carried. i a, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON Oct. 28 19 64 AT 8 : 00 P.M. TO CONSIDER A PETITION FORREZONE. FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: From GS-1 to B-1: Block 39 and that portion of Block 38 of C.' D. Hillman' s Earl- ington Gardens Add. No. 1, lying north of the Freeway. ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID Rezone ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON Oct. 28 , 19 64 .AT 8 : 00 P.M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTEST OR OBJECTION TO SAME. PUBLISHED gotober 14 _ 1964 JAMES DENZER SECRETARY RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION I, JAMES MA(;WAnT hereby certify that three (3) copies of the above document were posted by me in three conspicuous places on the property described above as prescribed by laws. ATTEST Signed 7 NVTARY PUBLIC IN AND r'OR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT RENTON. . _ Renton Planning Commission Meeting June 10 , 1970 Minutes - Page 3 3 . Could the application (if valid) be amended to agree with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan? 4. Would the application (if valid) have to be readvertised and another public hearing held before the Planning Commission? The Planning Director then read the City Attorney' s reply which stated that in view of the fact that both the Planning Commis- sion and the City Council had approved this rezoning in 1964 ; and at that time the City could not legally impose restrictions but had to rely on the voluntary action of the owners, that the property owner is entitled to his rezoning. With reference to the conflict with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the Plan shows a Light Industry use and a B-1 zoning would not be in- compatible as the zoning ordinance allows the B-1 use in the L-1 District. If the applicant wishes to change his applica- tion to L-1, he would have to reapply and go through the whole procedure again. If the B-1 request is unchanged, it is the City Attorney' s opinion that the applicant is entitled to the rezoning. At the Commission' s request, the Planning Director explained the substance of the restrictive covenants filed by the prop- erty owner pertaining to setbacks and landscaping to the effect that no structure or building shall be constructed or located within 30 feet of the existing boundary of FAI 405; and further that 20 feet of the aforesaid setback provision shall be main- tained in an appropriate manner as a planting and screening strip consisting of shrubs and trees. These covenants run with the land until December 31, 1980. This matter will be considered by the Planning Commission on June 24 , 1970 . 5 . NEW ITEMS OF BUSINESS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION AT PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF JUNE 24, 1970 : SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION a) KAMPE CONSTRUCTION CO. , Appl. No. SP-652-70; special permit to allow apartment use in R-2 zone; property located on Monroe Ave. NE between NE 12th St. and Sunset Blvd. NE The Planning Director pointed out property location on the zoning map and noted that originally the property owner had requested R-3 zoning. After public hearing, this request was denied by the Commission. R-2 zoning was granted on appeal to City Council. A plan of the proposed apartment develop- ment was displayed. This matter will be considered at the public hearing meeting of June 24 , 1970 . SITE PLAN APPROVALS b) AERO DYNE CORP. , Appl. No. SA-651-70; request for site plan approval in P-1 zone; property located on Airport Way between Shattuck and Logan Aves. SW The Planning Director noted that applicant wishes to construct two' new hangars including office and storage space under lease arrangement from the Airport Board. Slides of the area were shown. In a letter dated June 8, 1970, the applicant has requested Planning Commission consideration of the site plan approval request at the meeting of June, 10th due to business commit- ments. 1 Ci tO T T T T 1 OI+`7+'IC_I+. OI+` III} ('IT1" :1'! 1OIl\I+a- IZ};.LO`,\"AtiIIi\'C 1O\ POST OFFICE BOX 626, 100 2ND STREET BUILDING, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ALPINE 5-8678 cr GERARD M. SHELLAN, CITY ATTORNEY 9yS,o N JOHN K. PAIN, JR., ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY June 10 , 1970 RT CAPITA'- OE S Mr. Gordon Erickson Planning Director City Hall Renton, Washington Re : W. C. Siegelman Dear Gordon: This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated June 8 , 1970 and followed up by our telephone conversation of today regarding the above zoning matter from GS-1 to B-1. In looking over -ems file, it appears that the owners of the property made timely application for the rezoning in 1964. which application was approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council. An Ordinance was prepared by our office in November of 1964 and submitted to the Council for action. At that time the matter apparently was held up because of some ar>?.ngementS between the Planning Commission and the Owners whereby latter would impose voluntary restrictions on the subject property. For some reason unbeknownst to the writer, these restrictions were not filed of record until May of 1970 , a lapse of almost six years . I understand from you that in 1964 the City could not legally, under the facts of this case, impose the restrictions but had to rely on the voluntary action of the owners . That being the case, and in view of the fact that both the. Planning Commission and the City Council had approved this rezoning , it would appear quite conclusive that the property owner is entitled to his rezoning . This is further strengthened by the fact that the City could not then have legally enforced these restrictive covenants and we frankly do not know whether this, six year delay was due to the reluctance of the owner to execute them or the City ' s failure to press the matter. I further understand from you, as per our telephone conversation that there is no conflict in the present Comprehensive Land Use with the rezoning to B-1. Your letter seemed to indicate differently but since the Comprehensive Plan shows a Light Industry Use , a B-1 zoning would not be incompatible in veiw of the Mr. Gordon Erickson Page 2 June 10 , 1970 fact that our Ordinance allows such use in a Light Industry area. Furthermore, the B-1 zoning would be more restricti:ve .than the L-1 but this is a matter that the property owner should be concerned about and it might even be to his best interest to have petitioned for a L-1 zoning . If that were the case , he would have to re-apply and go through the whole procedure again. If Sie_gelman' s request to B-1 remains unchanged , it is our opinion that he is entitled to the rezoning without further delay. In conclusion, we would suggest that some kind of time limit procedure be set up to eliminate situations like the present one where the property owner undoubtedly assumed that his property had been rezoned six years ago. The owner should be notified that the ordinance is held up pending certain other actions to be performed by the owner with a time limitation established so as to avoid any misunderstandings . If we can be of any further help to you, please let us know. We remain Yours very truly, r'eard M. Shellan j, City Attorney GMS:nd June• Gerard 11. Shelienr Cit Attorneyy P.' Oe Box 626. . Renton, Washington 98055 Re: W. C. Siegelman, request .for -rezone from GS-1 to B-1; Appl.,."NoNo. R-210-64; property". located. between FAI. 405 'and SW Grady Way, westerly ,of Raymond Ave. SW Dear Jerry: The City Council, by its action of. May 25,. 1970, referred:: the Siegelman rezone application to the. Planning Commission for review and recommendation. The reason for the referral was the period of time:•which:has elapsed, between the origi- nal dates of the Planning Commission and City Council actions and the completion of the action on the rezone ordinance. Public hearing before the Planning Commission was:. conducted and the application was recommended for approval to the City Council subject to the filing of an agreement pertaining to setbacks, landscaping .and screening. The City. Council con- curred in the recommendation of .the. Planning. Commission and referred the matter to the Law andOrdinance:Committee, Final approval of the ordinance was contingent upon the filing of the agreement, which was not recorded.until May 12, 1970. The Planning Commission at this time has raised the question as to the legality of the application in view of -the time elapsed since the original filing of October 5, 1964. Since the date of the :'original filing, the Comprehensive Land Use Plan has been revised, and the application is in;. conflict with the proposed use of `the ,area, in question. The. Commis- sion Chairman questions whether or not the Commission can,. in fact, . act upon the application due 'to. the present con- flict .with. the .Comprehensive Land Use Plan. your review and opinion' The"PlanningCommission requests as - . to what legal ;avenues- the ;'Commission can at this time pursue. Basically, the Commission has raised the following questions: Mr.: Gerard. `M . Shellan June 8, 1970. 1. Is,. the Siegelman appli;cation;,;still valid?- 2..' ' Could -the Planning 'Commission stand. on :,its previous action of -1964:,:due: to the :change;;; in the Comprehensive Land-.Use Plan? 3•Could, the application (if• valid) be amended to;agree with:.tli®•.Comprehensive 'Land Use :,:: : .. - Plan? 4. . Would- the application` (if valid). have '.to;,be re-advertised . and another: public hearing held before: the Planning, Commission?:' Very`.:truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen' Planning _Director, NOTICE OF. .PUBLIC '.HEARING RENTON • PLANNING COMMISSION . . RENTON,' WASHINGTON A, PUBLIC HEARING :WILL BE.HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION., AT ' ITS : ' . ` '. , REGULAR MEETING: IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, , CITY HALL, 'RENTON, WASHINGTON ON 'JUNE 24 1970 , AT 8 : 00 P .M. : TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING' PETITIONS 1. REZONE. FROM G. TO B-1'; property located NE corner Rainier. Ave.: S. and •S. 7th ,St'.-. LEGAL DESCRIPTION:: , . Sa-< Portion of Govtr 'i'Lot' :16' in Sec' ''18 ,'';;Tw '2,'3N,',•: R` 1 5E' '!'W':'M. lying',,'eas ter ly''of; State' Highway No' : ^5;;`. we-st'•of;=Shattuck.,:'': Avee ' S. :,: 1 south..of i.:'the.;centerline:,of S'.. ` .6th St producd •e - westerly-,, 'and''.nortY ,oh' f ,the',`north :line° of', S:. -7th> St' ; less `the,.:east 12.0'"'ft ',les's; :the, ;north',' 180, ft subj.ect ti;' to easement`:for Bonneville Power:'Adm'inistrati'on'•' s,,.:.trans= 1{lit 11;'yl: P: .l'I.mission 'line-:,,•., ,W. 2. REZONE FROM GS-1 TO B-1; property located on SW Grady Way' betweeh Thomas and' Raymond Ayes. -SW. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Svese 'vAAa.h „ Al1`.B10 T, k$ e::. 3!8' e: aiS•'ia.- •. 3`9 . :egC,et'. D': He. 1: 1e' ms..nst,!'s.',; Eeg` arll` nE' tXon.,4:.'':`: r,,:, ardens:'tisi L oi :-"i_o :thC ..t, ;of'- eata_ I) .1?1r o "•1'' •aec.orrdirig :to' pla :-recordediri',:,vo: plats ; pa : 74;".. ;n..,'.Kin % County'; Wa ,l-iinton ,' CEP:T'`•'c.: 'i,, tl-i'at portion: of,.'Block',38 conveyed :to''the State of.''i' Washin ton:, for tate',,,Hi hwa :'b .tided' recorded :under" `' L ' 'audito ' -fi l No :5525661, •aogetYer , a;l'tl those;. ,.=a" ',. ,,:: , porrtions =of.'vacated Thomas ,and'•Raymorid'1'Avenues 'S,. W..: and .outh .et :12th Street adjoiningis zb+'ect 'to 'a `; uther 3'0',feet `of•;'-• tz.t' ] ,t e seme'nt'''rove'r -the• So r. said,. p-i0oC`:',3r :measured.'' 'erpendicu1arl i;''to•it4. northerl ' 4" margin's ;of':" ''A'T:: ##40:5; 'an e t r1 ''g d Sou,thw s.t. '1.•'3 th':' S re•et,' 3 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR APT. USE IN' R-2; ZONE; pproperty' located no Monroe ,, Ave;. ' NE. between NE 12'th St: and Sunset Blvd. NE. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 3„and 4 tn.'Bl®ok••1',•of SHEPARD MEIGHTS ,ADDITION:TO RENTON as', per:-pl at:.recorded °;. i n Vol ume=`:46:`'of PI ats,'Page. 79, Records o.f.. King County; Washington and that-,portion,, : ;• of 'the.' East z'.of•.the Southeast.4 of the ,Southwest:',-of Section 4,, Township'23: North, ,'a Range .5• E M; ast, W. .:::descrihe d as..•,follows: t ' ,, ,, C.7.. a i. e' 8e ir nin' 'at• a ont'on':the• ast'line. of sa d .Southwest.', North', o. '' 1,, 16 12 'East'163.15, feet 'of. the':.Southeast cornen• j , , thereof, the :true point •of beginning;• .thence North F ' ' ' , 10 16'`':',,1'2"• East 326.75, feet• thence North 880 53'' OR" West: s';,:: , 114,06..feet,'--thence southerly to .a point,lying North : '_v ;, , t ' 4; 88° 55'` 33".'West:;112.00 feet from 'the.true"point of: thence South •8. 0 E I ;` I; { beginning, 8 55.'. 33" ast.:,'.1,2.00 feet;'to the•:, , ; ;. .. ;,•;: • , g.laguepointoenr9,9. 4t 1`: 1 t'1 ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO B PRESENT .AT THE-PLANNING ON ' JUNE 24 , 1970 " x' •• AT 8 :00' P;.M: TO '.VO:ICE THEIR PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO SAME .. JOHN C. STERLING, SECRETARY i;: PUBLISHED June 10, 1970 .• ' RENTON. COMMISSION • ' a: CERTIFICATION I, ''Richard- Br. Hansen' ',.'..HEREBY- CERTIFY 'THAT , THREE COPIES'. OF THE ABOVE , 1, , ' DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME. IN THREE CONSPICUOuIS_R,LACES ON THE P PERTY , DESCRIBED 'AS01J;E•.AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW'. .' " ES , Su bscr.ib'ed' and- sworn SIGN l/,.2r,-- 12 r ATTEST u W to. before me,' , a ,-No`tary' Public, on the '\2 `' day'• •o'f 'v,_, 19 ' lU Renton Planning Commission Meeting May 27, 1970 Minutes - Page 4 Y- (1) W. C. Seigelman, Appl. No. R-210-64 (1964) ; rezone from GS-1 to B-1; property located between FAI 05 and Renton Junction Way westerly of Raymond Ave. SW (this application was approved by the Planning Commission and City Council in 1964 but not consummated by ordinance) Planning Commission study and recommendation. requested The Planning Director presented a brief history of subject referral . He noted that Planning Commission and City Council approval in 1964 was based on the voluntary fil- ing by the applicant of restrictive covenants pertaining to setbacks and landscaping. No covenants were filed, and the application has lain dormant since that time. However, restrictive covenants were filed for record with the County Auditor ' s office on May 20, 1970, reactivating the application. Questions were raised regarding conformance with the Com- prehensive Land Use Plan, legality of the application it- self in view of the amount of time elapsed since original filing on October 5 , 1964 , whether or not the application should be republished and reposted. The Chairman stated this matter would be placed on the agenda for the next study session and asked the Planning Director to. get an opinion from the City Attorney with respect to the legal avenues the Commission could pursue. This referral will be placed on the agenda for consideration at the public hearing meeting of June 24 , 1970. 2) Petition for Vacation of Whitman Court NE (.lying north of Honeydew .Estates) --Planning Commission recom- mendation requested The Planning Director presented slides of the area for Commission information. The Chairman stated this matter would be placed on the agenda for the next study session. b) Landscaping Proposed under .FAI 405 at Mill Avenue S. For Planning Commission information, the Planning Director displayed a plan worked out by the State Highway Department in conjunction with city departments for landscaping under FAI 405 at Mill Avenue S. The Highway Department will in- stall the landscaping, complete with sprinkling system, on the basis that the city will maintain the area. The Board of Public Works has reviewed this matter and has recommended that the city accept the plan with the addition of a small sit-in park with bench and walkway. c) Study Session Date Following considerable. discussion on the subject of biweekly study sessions, it was decided to hold a study session follow- ing completion of the next regularly scheduled administrative meeting on June 10, 1970 . The administrative meeting will convene at 7 : 30 p.m. Agenda for the study session will in- clude those matters continued from this session as well as a review of the Commission work program for 1970 and compila- tion of priorities for programs . As there was no further business before the Planning Commis- sion, it was MOVED BY DENZER, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. MOTION CARRIED. The meeting was adjourned at 10 : 00 p.m. 1 O NA NCB NO: a...t) r r., N ORbINANCE OF E C ANT N 'IASniNGToN i CHANCING,:F:j A Y'TY OF. 2 0L ` : Ti113 ZONING CLASSIFICATION O. CURTAIN P. '2TIES ? .'': :ri. ;'; ROPE. XTHIN THE r; Yfe,*::I '''-,;a<:%', CI'IY OF RBNTON FROM "(SNBkA1; 'BB/Ai/WAN It StDENCE DIST;2I ". i.; 7 :i" . s, f t;s-i) TO {'Bti5INLSS bISTaICT" 0 mil) i . J4 tE ,As tinder Chapter VI#i 'fine IV (Business Zegulationt) of Ordinance ' 004 1628 khot4n as the "code .of General Ordinances of the City b Renton", as amencji tI and the 1 aapa adb;tell in con junction therewtthi 'the properties hereinbeiota%described have h t itaktire tie" kited as Genatal SdbUrban :_tes idehte atr ict GSA-i3; attd ql#EREA3 a pr. -r petition £or Change of xofte ,o•assification of said properties tias tiet:h filed faith the + `.ty on or about September .1964. which petition was then - referred to the' iiiafthiftg .,. t§eibh fot investiga ion, study and public hearings' and‘a lsttbiic hearing hatilhg .. en held thereon o or about October 28, 1964g all ptir4iiant to nottoe at hear .tig i ublished / hd• y 9 posted.as pr®tiidt;d by laws and said ,: L• matter hatiing beeh duly cohsiderea by the 0 tinning coittitsibn, and all parties having '' r c en heard appearing in support the:.“of 4 ih oppositiot thereto, Ndt•' THEREFORE BE IT 0_1 AthEb BY tilt MAYOR -`46 THE CITY COUNCIL OH THE CITY OP RENTON,• ':. AS FOLt0t4S: SUCTION I.: : The following /descri' ea parcel of property io the CITY O1l • - ' ' • RENTON iL hereby tazdned to Busi- ss DLstr ',:.t• B-I) and the City°i tgiheer and" . the?Pianning Director ate hereby authorized a:," c i,rected to change the maps of the ,, . zoning Ordinance t 48 mended to dOidehce staid r'a,•nitagi Block 90 and that p tiott of Nook 38 of Co , .}b 4lman'•a Eartington Gardens Add. ice fi lying north of the Free , SECTIOi4"..II: 'f it Ordinance shall- be in full .,rce and ,effect froth `end , ' ' ' • . after its palssage, tiproyal and legal publication. ASSES B'Y ' Ohl COUNCIL this:. _, day ok Novembe \ 1964. Itela a Nelson,'Cit: ' ;leek ,... .,' . „_ _ _, A0P40 = i BY THE MAYOR this day of Novembet$ l964, • Donald W. Custer, Mayor APPROVED AS TO 004M z Gerard M. Sheliany City :Attorney Date `oE b'ic'at ion t, _. : . I INTER-OFFICE MEMO Date 17171WOOTe 13, 19644 riar4.0 Cit7 (.1,0e4 From: Departmental Account No. dr lalzoi)p t7 rnelnoerTo Expendituri... Account No. Message: Attached .-tGt,ct aro goz.,Ir GrefirmthcTro.,-"p_omd resnal...mac4 t 4luahin Catipariyo 0:2lelior Wad: Ccarawl 'AA C. alogel= txid z.:1* Ozbalto Mac° cic022 100'21t3 clad =trail to no Morkto OffEcots Tic NawnvCrC16334: Minutes of the Renton City Council Meeting 11-9-64 COMMUNICATIONS: (cont.), A letter read from Mr. Robert Spielman, 641 "N" Place appealed decision of the Planning Commission regarding request for variance "from front and rear setback requirements, on irregularly shaped parcel of ground. Moved by Poli, seconded by Hulse, that next Monday, November 16, 1964 at 8:00 p.m. be set for hearing'.on 'the. appeal of Mr. Spielman. Carried. ' . A letter read. from Planning Director J. David Jensen submitted Planning Commission recommendations from `its public hearing meeting of 10-28-64 as follows: 1. Application R-207-64, Austin Company, 2930 - 4th Ave. So. rezone from G and 2S-1 to L-1 subject. to setback, landscaping planting strip and dedication of road and utility easement which. are standards adopted as. minimum requirements for development of industrial uses in this area. Moved by'Hulse, seconded by Schellert, to concur in the Planning Commission recommendation with referral to the Law and Ordinance. Committee following compliance with restrictive .covenants. ' Carried.' 2. Application R'-208-64, Glacier, Park and Great Northern Railway Companies rezone from G to L-1 with adequate setbacks from the West Valley Road, of properties lying westerly of the Union Pacfic and Chicago, Milwaukee Railroad right-of-way, and rezone of the balance of .the property from G to. H-1 with provision for development of standards along South 180th, the East Valley Hwy. 'and 88th Avenue South as proposed. Moved by Schellert:, seconded by Dahlquist, to concur in the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Carried. Moved by-Hulse, seconded by Poll, that upon completion of the covenants the matter be referred to the Law,.and Ordinance Committee for proper Ordinance. Discussion ensued regarding ability to. comply•where the streets are not yet established and,the fact that. the covenants •are upon the land and not retro- active. once development has been achieved, the pending motion carried. 3. ' Application-R-209-64, Slavo Ozbolt rezone from S-1 to B-1 which constitutes a natural extension of existing business and zoning uses. Moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Poli, "tov.concur in the recommendation, with referral to the Law & Ordinance Committee. Carried. 4. Application R-210-64, 'W. C. Siegelman rezone from'GS-1 to B-1 with provisions . that building setbacks from FAI 405 and landscape planting strip be applied on same basis as with properties lyin to the West. Moved by Poli, seconded -by Gianini, to concur in the recommendation with referral ' . o 'the Law and Ordinance Committee. Carried. . 5. - Application. V-213-64, A.M.Roberts Variance to allow construction of 'addition to existing building at 308 Williams Street provided the payment be made to the City of the required ".in lieu of parking'fee". Moved by Schellert, seconded by Dahlquist, to concur in the recommendation. The motion carried.. A letter. read from City Engineer. Wilson reported results of survey of "all street lights within "the 'City taken in May of this year which resulted as follows: : . 442 - 20,000.Lumen Mercury Vapor Lights on Puget Sound Power & Light Co. poles 133 - 20,000 Lumen Mercury Vapor Lights on City of Renton poles 834 - •7,000 Lumen Mercury Vapor Lights Upon sale to Puget Power of City owned fixtures - the 442 - 20,000 Lumen Lights, the City would own the. 133 - 20,000 Lumen Lights as Puget Sound Power & Light Company now . owns the 834. Mayor Custer advised he had requested this report that it might be forwarded to the Law and Ordinance Committee for attachment to the -pending Resolution declaring the 442 fixtures surplus so that the sale thereof might proceed. Moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Bruce, to concur in the. referral for attachment to the Resolution. Carried. A letter from City Engineer Wilson, signed also by Traffic Division Captain, Ernest E. Henry, Police Department recommended that the present traffic ordinance be amended in order that a 30 M.P.H. speed limit might be established on Puget Drive from 116th Avenue S.E. to the Talbot Road extension. Moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Schellert, to concur in the recommendation with referral to the Law and Ordinance Committee.. Carried. 3- P-a;,,---k7.4.,r,91 '-f•I tt, ,•Oefcr-',.—;40• , ,,,--.4 NRIA4. '1, WVw katgs-srAN Me nt cm ilv Lt74:7.2:-.44.- -..1.- /Y,,,,,;_4 't::A •,'-).-4,:',y.W4Y 441 S Tea 5 Vd G Tr 0 ag the Jet Transport Capital of the World 1 1W27,2iV4P-14 ,1 V'tt'4'.'"NP?"Z1;'-',"'"it,,,,,,,4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 114zz,,,, p4,,..„.,,,...„, ijo cv„ 3.,Lip(„;tig.A., ,,,,,-n November 9 , 1964 1 py 1 Honorable Nayor Donald Custer r Members of the City Council c Gentlemen: The Planning Commission at its public hearing October 28 , 1984 , •acted favorably upon the follow- ; ing items t'°`' -•',/ ---,7' ,1 1.: APplication A-207-64 , AUSTIN COMPANY:e,- 3*.- , ,-7.-,- • A.:: 14 4 cO, J The Planning Commission recommends rezone 1 from G and GS-1 to L-1 of properties as described , 1 in the Application,• subject to the owner' s accept- ance of the following standards deemed necessary for the development of properties in this vicinity: a. Building setbacks of 60 ' from FAI . 405 and South 153rd Street.! b. Side street setbacks of 30 ° . c. ' Installation of -a landscaped planting I strip 20 ' in width encompassing the entire property, VV i d. Dedication of or an easement over the . South 15 ° of the property for roadway and utility purposes. The foregoing standards are those adopted IV heretofore by the Planning Commission and the Council i 1 as minimum requirements for development of industrial uses in this area. I 2... Application R-208-64 , GLACIER PARK AND GREAT i: NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANIES . ' ea n _ The Commission recommends that the properties as described in the application and lying westerly of 1 the Union Pacific and Chicago, Milwaukee Railroad right 'of way be reclassified from G to L-1, with ade- quate provision for setir cks from the West .YalIey Road , I November 9 , 1964 and further recommends that the balance of the proper- ties described in the application be rezoned from G . to H-1 with provision for development . of properties to industrial park standards along South 180th Street , the East Valley Highway, and 88th Avenue South as proposed. ii 3 . Application R-209-64 , SLAVO OZBOLT: The Commission recommends rezone of the prop- erties as described in the application be rezoned from , S-1 to B-1. This constitutes a natural extension of existing business zoning and uses . I 4 . Application R-210-64 , W. C. SIEGELMAN : The Commission recommends rezone of the prop- erties as described in the application from GS-1 to: B-1 with the provision that building setbacks from FAI y - J 405 and landscape planting strip be applied on the same basis as applicable to the properties lying to the west,. • 5 . Application V-213-64 , A. M. ROBERTS : . The Commission recommends that a Variance be 40( granted to allow construction of an addition to an exis- ting building at 308 Williams Street , provided the appli- o cant pay to the City the required, "in lieu of.. parking , fee" . The Council ' s concurrence in the foregoing recommen dations is respectfully requested. Yours very truly, . J. Dav ' d 'Jensen P an g Director .. JDJ : pc 2- Planning Commission October 28 , 1964 Page 2 2 , Continued: Director' s report: Recommend approval of the request with the exceptions as contained in the Committee report , and with the further recommen- dations that setbacks of sufficient depth for 'industrial park stan- dards be established along South 180th Street and East Valley High- way and along 88th Avenue South and its proposed extension, Mr. Jensen pointed out the subject area on the map and explain- ed that setbacks would be very important a1.ona 88th Avenue South,wh. is proposed as a major arterial;ana ' also on South 180th and also on the East Valley Highway In the discussion that followed- Mr. Boyd, Great Northern Rail- road representative, stated that one objection would be to the application of industrial park standards on the area between 88th and the West Valley Highway, He stated that excessive setbacks would not leave sufficient room for, the building already. proposed for this area, Mr. Boyd further outlined the Railroad° s plans for their pro- perties in the area. Generally, the areas to the west , including Tukwila, between the Railroad and the West Valley Highway would be for heavy industrial uses . The remainder would be for lighter in- dustrial or industrial park type uses. It was moved by Peretti, seconded by Denzer that the rezone be approved on the basis of the Committee and the Director' s re- ports , and that if necessary,modifications can be made at a later date. with adequate setback provisions on the East Valley Highway and South 180th. In the' discussion on the motion, Mr. Jensen emphasized the importance of adequate setbacks on the major arterials in order to provide for future traffic circulation within the proposed in- dustrial district, Mr. Busch stated that he felt that some kind of plot plan should be worked out for this area. Mr. Felker stated that this would be understandably difficult until the property owners know what their building plans are to be. Question being called , the motion carried. 3, SLAVO OZBOLT: R-209-64 , request for rezone from S-1 to B-1 of cer- tain properties abutting upon Edwards Street as described in the Application. Committee and Director' s reports recommended approval of the request. Chairman Felker asked if there were any oral or written objec- tions to this rezone, There were none. Mr. Jensen stated that the rezone is requested for additional parking space in connection with the existing car wash business on the adjoining property. It was then moved by Denzer, seconded by RacanellD. that the Committee and Director' s reports be accepted and that the Commission recommends to the City Council the granting of the rezone from. S-1 to B-1. Motion carried. 4,) W. C. SIEGELMAN, R-210-64 , .request for rezone from GS-1 to B-19 of Block 39 and that portion of Block 38 of C. D. Hillman' s Earlington Planning Commission October 289 1964 Page 3 Continued: Gardens Add, No. lag lying northerly of FAI 405 . Committee report.: Recommend approval of the request with the provision that adequate setbacks be established from FAI 405 on the same basis applied to adjacent properties lying westerly. Director° s r eport : Recommend approval on the same basis as the committee report . Recommend further that the development of this property would be in compliance with the proposed industrial park standards and recommends further that serious consideration should be given to the desirable probability of vacation of Streets and alleys lying westerly of 84th Avenue South. A letter was read from Mr. E. R. Coleman, representative for the applicant, stating that the applicant would not object to L-1 in place of the B®1 as requested, since the area is shown on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan as Light Industrial. Mr. Jensen stated that if the change is made to L-1 this would require reposting of the property and another hearing. After further discussion it was moved by Peretti, seconded by Denzer, to concur in the Committee and Director' s reports and re- commend to the City Council the rezone from GS-1 to B-1 as request- ed on the Application. Motion carried. 5 . ROBERT N. SPI4MAN, V-212-649 request for Variance to enlarge exist- ing house, and to waive front and rear yard requirements , 641 N Place. Committee report : Recommend denial of the request for Variance. Director' s report: Recommend that the rear yard variance request be granted. Chairman Felker asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak on this subject. The applicant , Mr. Spielman stated that he needed the additional room for his family , and that the front yard variance was necessary in order to provide for a carport. He felt that a hardship was involved in this case because of the limitations of the small lot . Chairman Felker stated that he did not think that this property could qualify under the terms of the ordinance as a hard- ship case. It was then moved by Peretti , seconded by Busch, that the request be denied. Roll call vote being called the results were as follows : Ayes" -= Wes Busch, James Denzer , John Racanello , Dr. Baird Bardarson, Louis Peretti . Nays" m Clark Teegarden, Dayle Garrison. The motion to deny carried. 11111 a. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNZ•NG COMMISSION RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE, HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS' REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON Oct. 28 19 64 AT 8 : 00 P.M. TO CONSIDER A PETITION FORREZONE. FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: From GS-1 to B-1: Block 39 and that portion of Block 38 of C. D. Hillman' s Earl- ington Gardens Add. No. 1 , lying north of the Freeway. ANY AND ALL PERSONS . INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID Rezone ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON Oct. 28 , 19 64 .AT 8 : 00P.M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTEST OR OBJECTIONTO SAME. PUBLISHED Qotober 14. 1964 JAMES DENZER SECRETARY RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION I, JAMES MASSTAT)T hereby certify that three (3) copies of the above document were posted by me in three conspicuous places on the property described above as prescribed by laws. ATTEST: . Signed. _ NbTARY PUBLIC. IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT RENTON. . _ INTER-OFFICE MEMO DateCc ti.dbfW 19ai From: Departmental Account No. jradt Olity EVOltipCirTo:Expenditure Account No. Message 4tt,a:ched be,tmt4t. az-0 eati oranamoo relatirct 1sxvilmaed t4etwirea Cirvi744.7) C4,-301.0 Pailt CWPcht% 7. 914. aogarol ;c1,,r4 61,3 PO, Ch7;bolto Ple,ezz-; logal,6 and ri:kAtto] tta the C.1o406 021'.4100‘. ttav-13 City Olork 1. Minutes of the Renton City Council Meeting 11-9-64 COMMUNICATIONS: (cont.) A letter read from Mr. Robert Spielman, 641 "N" Place appealed decision of the Planning Commission regarding request for variance from front and rear setback requirements, on irregularly shaped parcel of ground. Moved by Poli, seconded by Hulse, that next Monday, November 16, 1964 at 8:00 p.m. be set for hearing .on the appeal of Mr. Spielman. Carried. M • A letter read. from Planning Director J. David Jensen submitted Planning Commission recommendations from `its public hearing meeting of 10-28-64 as follows: 1. Application R-207-64, Austin Company, 2930 - 4th Ave. So. rezone from G and GS-1 to L-1 subject to setback, landscaping planting strip and dedication of road and utility easement which. are standards adopted as minimum requirements for development of industrial uses in this area. Moved by'Hulse, seconded by Schellert, to concur in the Planning Commission recommendation with referral to the Law and Ordinance Committee following compliance with restrictive covenants. Carried. 2. Application R=208-64, Glacier Park and Great Northern Railway Companies rezone from G to L-1' witb adequate setbacks from the West Valley Road, of properties lying westerly of the Union Pacfic and Chicago, Milwaukee Railroad right-of-way, and rezone of the balance of the property from G to_ H-1 with provision for development of standards along South 180th, the East Valley Hwy. and 88th Avenue South as proposed. Moved by Schellert:, seconded by Dahlquist, to concur in the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Carried. Moved by Hulse, seconded by Poli, that upon completion of the covenants the matter be referred to the Law,.and Ordinance Committee for proper Ordinance. Discussion ensued regarding ability to comply. where the streets are not yet established and the fact that. the' covenants are upon the land and not retro- active once development has been achieved, the pending motion carried. 3o Application- R-209-64, Slavo Ozbolt rezone from S-1 to B-1 which constitutes_ . a natural extension of existing business and zoning uses. Moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Poli, .to .concur' in the recommendation, with referral to the Law & Ordinance Committee. Carried. • _ 4. Application R-210-64, 'W. C. Siegelman rezone from'GS-1 to B-1 with provisions that building setbacks from FAI 405 and landscape planting strip be applied on same basis as with properties lying to the West. Moved by Poli, seconded by Gianini, to concur in the recommendation with referral o the Law and Ordinance Committee. Carried. . 5. .Application. V-213-64, A.M.Roberts Variance to allow construction of addition .' to existing building at 308 Williams Street provided the payment be made to the City of the required ",in lieu of parking fee". . Moved by Schellert, seconded by Dahiquist, to concur in the recommendation. The motion carried.. A 'letter read' from City Engineer Wilson reported results of survey of all street lights within the 'City taken in May of this year which resulted as follows: 442 - 20,000 Lumen Mercury Vapor Lights on Puget Sound Power & Light Co. poles 133 - 20,000 Lumen Mercury Vapor Lights on City of Renton poles 834 - 7,000 Lumen Mercury Vapor Lights . Upon sale to' Puget Power of City owned fixtures - the 442 - 20,000 Lumen Lights, the City would own the 133 - 20,000 Lumen Lights as Puget Sound Power & Light Company now owns the 834. Mayor Custer advised he had requested this report that it might be forwarded to the Law and Ordinance Committee for attachment to the pending Resolution declaring the 442 fixtures surplus so that the sale thereof might proceed. Moved 'by Delaurenti, seconded by Bruce, to concur in the. referral for attachment to the Resolution. Carried. ' A letter from City Engineer Wilson, signed also by Traffic Division Captain, Ernest E. Henry, Police Department recommended that the present traffic ordinance be amended in order that a 30 M.P.H. speed limit might be established on Puget Drive from 116th Avenue S.E. to the Talbot Road extension. Moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Schellert, to concur in the recommendation with referral to the Law and Ordinance Committee.. Carried. T 423 0:1,*0\4110ixiol r; 34-,`ss"Y" ,-- ,t., s"',,,.:- 4);•, i,je, !w S FM®QC!elr®6h1! the Jet Transport Capital of the Worl •d x:{.` ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT A:1-e'ft .a. r =:,,:, 7 ;:tt, ' November 9 , 19 64 Honorable Donald Custes Members .of the City Council Gentlemen: i . . The. Planning Commission at its public hearing October 28 , ,1964 ;acted favorably upon .the follow- ing items : to Application d.--20.7-64 ;- AUSTIN COMPANY: a.;°' ; C: 4-f. The Planning. Commission recommends"'re'zone from -G.-and GS-1 to • L-1 of properties as described' •. ., . -. in the,..Application,' subject to,'the owner' s accept ance of • the .,following standards deemed necessary for ' the: development of properties in this vicinity: a'. 1 Building setbacks of -60 ' from' FAI., 405 and South 153rd Street. 1 b. , Side: street setbacks of -30 ' . ' ' c. : Installation of -a landscaped planting . strip 20 ' in width encompassing the entire property. .,. . d. Dedication of or an easement over the South 15 ' ..of the property for roadway and utility purposes.' : The foregoing standards are, those adopted heretofore by .the Planning_ Commission 'and the Council as minimum requirements ' for development of ' industrial uses in this area. ' 2 .. .Application R-208-64 , GLACIER- PAR< .AND GREAT ' Si NORTHERN 'RAILWAY COMPANIES .' _ " C'.o The Commission recommends that the' properties as described in' the application and lying westerly of s the Union ' Pacific and Chicago, Milwaukee Railroad • • .' right of .way ,,be reclassified from G ta -L-1 , with .ade--' quate provision for setbacks from the West ;AValley Road , r a.. I November 9 , 1964 and further recommends that the balance of the proper- ties described in the application be rezoned from G to H-1 with provision for development of properties to industrial park standards along South 180th Street , the East Valley Highway, and 88th Avenue South as proposed. 3 . Application R-209-64 , SLAVO OZBOLT: The Commission recommends rezone of the prop- erties as described in the application be rezoned . from , S-1 to B-1. This constitutes a natural extension of existing business zoning and uses . 4 ® Application R-210-64 , W. C. SIEGELMAN : The Commission recommends rezone of the prop- , . erties as described in the application from GS-1 .to, B-1 with the provision that building setbacks from FAI y.--,. 405 and landscape planting strip be applied on the same basis as applicable to the properties lying to the west. .. 5 . Application V-213-64 , A. M. ROBERTS : i The Commission recommends that a Variance be granted to allow construction of an addition to an exis- ting building at 308 Williams Street , provided the appli- O • cant pay to the. City the required "in lieu of parking fee" . The Council ' s concurrence in the foregoing recommen= dations is respectfully requested. Yours very truly, J. Dav: d Jensen l PYaiin g Director . JDJ: pc 2- Planning Commission October 28 , 1964 Page 2 2 . Continueds Director' s report. Recommend approval of the request with the exceptions as contained in the Committee report , and with the further recommen- dations that setbacks of sufficient depth for industrial park stan- dards be established along South 180th Street and East Valley High- way and along 88th Avenue South and its proposed extension. Mr. Jensen pointed out the subject area on the map and explain- ed that setbacks would be very important' elonp 88th Avenue South,whi is proposed as a major arterial ;ana also on South 180th and also on the East Valley Highway. In the discussion that followed Mr. Boyd, Great Northern Rail- road representative, stated that one objection would be to the application of industrial park standards on the area between 88th and the West Valley Highway. He stated that excessive setbacks would not leave sufficient room for the building already proposed for this area. Mr. Boyd further outlined the Railroad' s plans for their pro- perties in the area. Generally, the areas to the west , including Tukwila, between the Railroad and the West Valley Highway would be for heavy industrial uses . The remainder would be for lighter in- dustrial or industrial park type uses. It was moved by Peretti, seconded by Denzer that the rezone be approved on the basis of the Committee and the Director' s re- ports , and that if necessary,modifications can be made at a later date, with adequate setback provisions on the East Valley Highway and South 180th. Ih the discussion on the motion, Mr. Jensen emphasized the importance of adequate setbacks on the major arterials in order to provide for future traffic circulation within the proposed in- dustrial district. Mr. Busch stated that he felt that some kind of plot plan should be worked out for this area. Mr. Felker stated that this would be understandably difficult ' until the property owners know what their building plans are to be. Question being called , the motion carried. 3. SLAVO OZBOLTg R-209-64 , request for rezone from S-1 to B-l' of cer- tain properties abutting upon Edwards Street as described in the Application. Committee and Director' s re arts recommended approval of the request. Chairman Felker asked if there were any oral or written objec- tions to this rezone. There were none. Mr. Jensen stated that the rezone is requested for additional parking space in connection with the existing car wash business on the adjoining property. It was then moved by Denzer, seconded by Racanellfl, that the Committee and Director' s reports be accepted and that the Commission recommends to the City Council the granting of the rezone from. S-1 to B-l. Motion carried. 4.) W. C. SIEGELMAN, R-210-64 , request for rezone from GS-1 to B-19 of Block 39 and that portion of Block 38 of C. D. Hillman' s Earlington 7 i Planning Commission October 28 , 1964 Page 3 Continued: Gardens Add. No. log lying northerly of FAI 405 . Committee retort : Recommend approval of the request with the provision that adequate setbacks be established from FAI 405 on the same basis applied to adjacent properties lying westerly. Director' s report: Recommend approval on the same basis as the committeereport. Recommend further that the development of this propertywouldbeincompliancewiththeproposedindustrialparkstandardsandrecommendsfurtherthatseriousconsiderationshouldbegiven tlthedesirableprobabilityofvacationofStreetsandalleyslyingwesterlyof84thAvenueSouth. A letter was read from Mr. E. R. Coleman, representative fortheapplicant, stating that the applicant would not object to L-1inplaceoftheB-1 as requested, since the area is shown on theComprehensiveLandUsePlanasLightIndustrial. Mr. Jensen stated that if the change is made to L-1 this wouldrequirerepostingofthepropertyandanotherhearing. After further discussion it was moved by Peretti, seconded byDenzer, to concur in the Committee and Director' s reports and re- commend to the City Council the rezone from GS-1 to B-1 as request-ed on the Application. Motion carried. 5 . ROBERT N. SPIEJMAN, V-212-64, request for Variance to enlarge exist-ing house., and to waive front and rear yard requirements, 641 NPlace. Committee report : Recommend denial of the request for Variance. Director' s report: Recommend that the rear yard variance request be granted. Chairman Felker asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak on this subject. The applicant , Mr. Spielmanstatedthatheneededtheadditionalroomforhisfamily, and that the front yard variance was necessary in order to provide for a carport. He felt that a hardship was involved in this case because of the limitations of the small lot . Chairman Felker stated that he did not think that this property could qualify under the terms of the ordinance as a hard- ship case. It was then moved by Peretti , seconded by Busch, thattherequestbedenied. Roll call vote being called the results were as follows : Ayes" - Wes Busch, James Denzer, John Racanello, Dr. Baird Bardarson, Louis Peretti. Nays" - Clark Teegarden, Dayle Garrison. The motion to deny carried. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON, . WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS' REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY -HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, . ON. Oct. 28 19 64 AT 8 : 00 P.M. TO CONSIDER A PETITION FORREZONE. FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: From GS-1 to B-i: Block 39 and that portion of Block 38 of C. D. Hillman' s - Earl- ington Gardens Add. No. 1 , lying north .of the Freeway. ANY AND .ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID Rezone ARE INVITED TO BE .PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON Oct. 28 , 19 .64 AT 8 : 00P.M. TO VOICE -THEIR PROTESTOR OBJECTION -TO SAME. PUBLISHED October 14_ 1964 JAMES DENZER . ,SECRETARY RENTON PLANNING. COMMISSION CERTIFICATION .• I, JAMES i C;S)'ADT hereby certify that three (3) copies. of the above. ocumen < were posted by me in three conspicuous places on the property described above as prescribed by laws. ATTEST Si nedr MRARY- PUBLIC. IN -AND tOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT RENTON. . _ r 4111 111111 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE. HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON Oct. 28 19 64 AT 8 : 00 P.M. TO CONSIDER A PETITION FORREZONE. FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: From GS-1 to B-1: Block 39 and that portion of Block 38 of C.' D. Hillman' s Earl- ington Gardens Add. No. 1, lying north of the Freeway. ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID Rezone ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON Oct. 28 , 19 64 AT 8 :00 P,M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTEST OR OBJECTION TO SAME. PUBLISHED October l4 . 1964 JAMES DENZER SECRETARY RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION I, JA ES MACSJADT hereby certify that three (3) copies of the above document were posted by me in three conspicuous places on the property described above as prescribed by laws. ATTEST: Signed. . . WEARY PUBLIC II( AND tOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT RENTON. . _