Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA97-164
SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 N. , RANGE 4 E. W.M. <: F RENTON, 1MASHNQTON `W FSD ! St"'5 ^' t.' I � fDst.Ir .. -mlllfM _ j J f? $FEI llL 4 f` ..i -._` � 9 flat:14,, '; -• swot swz..= X .``,In I i. �r .12 ii<;; • G __ 1 -I , 1, , UW 1 , . !Y Y.10.CTR-22N R.15-i t(1I _ F, "T_ '_.".y_'.--_ _ _f_' �i Y. an a•Rw,ow 0 T•61106. ..ai .'1 n+�.a,l,o to R•+xi+c. 'l SET TADI/LD , .�" �..��.,..,,,....i1:0�'0/ ' _..4 ."•�.-., �— !#1 �-wc xc..,, �) - mr a nano. pr Zro. / • ..., 't. _,, c, , ate« ,: -s„,.....,...c , ".... c c c .lii‘.a a,c a- l' T _____,;L--,.-__i,7 _ . w / 1 Wi ..1,,,...._„._.. • r' �rM --...---- .�'"�.�� Q4 Dom" "�w "°'� . 6r,,,,.t....i.,. • Iy $ eill011110111111.111 / • .. .,,......-----.----'-..-----------;;H< \ , '''''=-.. -ail ''':/ :116 , i it i if I i 4/1 TN0r4/1 ;� y ��`` -.Q; ,F n � B flWl MCC* f 1 1 i, ,fi IOC fR wArl4XT OaKL7a t C a e.§ n1 FRE 111DR.40 D SIDnd DRAM ..... ..w S SMEARY SEDER( i . a'�m. �.an •.a.' J�) .1 t \ (P GTGI BASIN M 1�y .•....•-... Or o. N OM AR • rJp t, \ /f AIWL•1 r h w.RT3.Aw ' \ GRAPHIC SCALE ,,t a - w... (w...) M >rw t rd..r a 2gIr SrsRt i' Olt VIII=ME: if .' �.� laLL1 mu UM LLM +,`l lr, `i.' <�t::ai.r - _•_i f.. m.rt,'u r :tl % .ta' i,ed • • :,It 'tit.:�, _.... .. `:1 j .R•. tl 1 1 1 _ _ _ _ _ .,wry_,:;, _ .:11 — {{ F' .t���� — Y.r .:,.,.: .tit c r;` --� _iii 'XC:i .:i'c;7r:r.:. _ ._..�` ��-�� �`Sq�':ti=:- a,:./2Iti�e,,, -,.f*C:„'1•'-_ � .., _ _ _--t___-_, Ill '::' Imo• t,' .a' .:c'if"j - 'r.'!>^ .;tS. __ _f ::P t I T [ac. � I il _ r' ,.�•',•1�I 2 ' . l ;,T1 •. � : '' ' , 1 1 I' • ' � t • _: C F \ `,j . ti. i 'I�' , I .I;I''Iti{, ,• r.' I' ;flld6aaD?L' ' x'" �-r� .tit ,,1�' ,i1,IV 2 7 l:jt)i oaf `'� ;� 1',' : s ''' ,,o, 1 f III'' S: • 1 .1, •i; 'ill',I GG'' Y'!: , l' ,.��;}1 ` pl'� ''', '.a}.J•`IT_id 9i:ft .,., .I '.` 1 J:: I I• � �% a' I 1 ' � �� '/�^" I mob■ ,� � i 1 Z`a ti-•6c'„` ,e....Jk:{,-.° �..�° � ` all is ':' � '%'I ar. • -4- ,dry ; -. � ■/3 I 1 �.'.1;. • u I�r ■y ti`� • .Ott,,•. - V. _ u ,• t .. . :.. ;..�.'. ••:,k .=.�,1..am- -_ --:...LC�'�.. .o. . ,� —e'•— _ i) : .a I 1 4 a 110 !ilia Wes ILM Clwy Mr 1' An_iii31.1 i Op=NM�wNt ILO EN IN � STRUCTU ER p duo ����� .�..I..W i�r.00e � 1".1 EN6INEERS�PIANNER� a _ Moo.. la 1 -I. ` /y� y 1\\. aal H.0 una usn '.\ �\ dI`(Nl)li et-3'I .•\\�V\\\\\�.\• \\�\\�\\\\\\x' \\\\\ 4 `4,` � M1�'' so \ (Cfq)i'LI..31*"� Rro)s( " (.). ` \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\v 4\•\ 1 . \A��Y\sa `' \\"'"d• _ia,z_rvati HI: an 4 13:nv � '°�_�sti-"^" .9.-�-.e . N.L \44 Sv \ (Ni) •LI v'31 (i ' Y•: .. �_ �— �ct3 N`+L� ,°`�``\)\° 'rr \ So. (N1•-1.9)s sl-.31 a:15 C= -gam_ ��c�?/'r•, i iT2. — ''\ a '% f as me `� l .;_ =° _ — _ ---� ( '� X.*:'•X"•. t+ '.. 9wd`Noon 15913 t`\sav L1 "% r— 7 __ _ $° -_-ao dnoao ,� -_ ''`° -!...2-_ IY odr"on`,n a.____ \I7cCtSc.'f h��: a�/ 9•sL- - �-u T-5.09 _�l ,` �.; • ���_ _�:,�•>`,:'-�. pow.'s�J7 9�+`=Y� cr13:(i).- tlJ,cr-_ . a' \r 1 k-:- _s----- - - 1 " ., Ft r Yh;,1. aa:eb',=z� �,!!�- ` �r lY�-�-a" �'��.: °-1 I:. o o IH z °�N'N3a1.'i.Ns3O4 �2o� ., J�a `✓/ L „ F•�L n 1 aaoa\sl �� - A1tl3ddtlA]0 A,M315a7 q��. �j/^ j '�" , I I �-� a'1 5,a3NwJ 3JN13 ''°—_`'`� a ��•--r,.\�--.", {,�. 4E-- �° '\� .. �1 "��� "i,,. F-'\ `a3Na03 Ala`d004 ` 1 � •/q' \ `_. �:, alry '$ °'i 10 Altl3Nla0N,Z' OYV 0. a . .y+}�a� :(al) 1SY3.0,SI a3Na0J 30031 jHyO CO• \\�iS✓•\� ` � O __ `,e h•.; ly' \ a ,N11� ` i 1 1} '\ i/- lit b�ryL�'4 o it a,•(191;07.N',3a ti 31 � \ 11->-,1.9, ti ,..21. 9. \ 1 a3NN00 Alb]dObd!0 A,,35 b'0 ONv A,N.S 01 1. l\ 4 ° `vl SI a3N3J0 30N31 I M'hp,/ 3,\ •° \\ \ `��\�' �1y I i A p": etpot dnaao�I d• .____:,/ ' /1 " ,A l"' :,, II• }II6'•I I1 . . ,../.....,,,3„,./,‘„, m4' A.,,,::: •; , , ,,,7 . 1 ?Al i es; '. -/-1 / in a .� �� c. A� PzY I iwit '�,,� P"` C (� I v z,, ,...___1: / e i 3I'f6� '� S,. \ 1 •\ .'"R- ° hd9'`. , I O f.IH.•.SON�31L I' R °\ OB� 1,/R3 3Nn.l:9N -., o NJ a •,, ..II I) • .. �c _ i s` 1v ? s �� $'_'I Y 8W . \� eIIo � ° / `• p4If - '� 41—�i $• ' \ 0, - ---,......z. -1,"". / . , 1110,, J ,. , -:.. .0)a... 31 / ''''' f j,>.s --_lln •�.'-=_=,�' . .1$G1 A 1 m'oo sW1i / NvnJ ;Lq •. a'v - tl\ 1 151E 1 _ J aA10364y� " 47'1r r... tQd'iln 33 75 5io aa ,s5 y l ie.'— .v , a r� .... �e .-> 'vim - - ir,— . . saoNJNv/5n ���-_ �rn11A '_ ._i ' � —'4's,-- 3bd',lni _ _ - t N1HM 3N00.9 , a3uro-owo xl n etlro-oAw s e!: • �9SL m7V . s 55 P 1b 95 ai e w AHBL A aze. o �98g: 1.1 Opus Northwest LLC i 0`60 . 99 Upper Monster Road ?iiiiii Y y I" 0 N �mVm' Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan dill, T $ CIVILSTRUCTURAL ! 0 1 c,,.eu Opus Northwest LLC lE��l � E N C I N E E R S I P L A N N E R S 000•u9111 POW.Nf.Sulu 105, War..1915515591m 95001 Imel 1ealmo .. .°•1i10z ,.,. o.,.. •^^,^ ,.,.,'-1,1, .„.rr-•'•""'" +l,ts J: laCU nvu YML1A4 y l,M C " -• :' p'.,' v f \ I .:l• i�p�{� • :5• ti of ..5•.r. -...._W, ..per .-..,.-._ .,_.._•_:._ _ __ !�<t__._�'-..., T..9 _— • ^'t�_ �___ ..-!y:.•,. .. '• rli=;,..:.,. .YJ„4,Xj.u.r.,.F ..•.,r,,.•1 ....._...; .' __�� nb.!'r':l '""�"�'� '_-...��.._""ro•7_.....-a:�::c....<Gw'H„J�'-.''`'is': .:_':.{,••,a4`_'. 'lt I�`:" • �,.�$tia�'�° �i, A.• N` .V,`�-`d(D'E- : ;:Y � •; r. �� '� ' dt � 3 i5 ^4."� ', '� \``sl '1' tt , , ��, .. . ^' I t ':• : �k,44 ,� ' :' -'i' I ,� . ; .!H: '� +"\ . a; t 'i1 , •':'7..� YI "Ti 1 � , .1t'f,. tIJ•A,:ti., .. i r ♦'_ • ���{- 'ra", 4� '�'1':jil:;i(7 �� � 'JN-'."4:.,tG^gw4.�‘yt:-_ :.� '.i"" :'�•""Ibl I �l -r:-- C- __ , : , ; . ,.„'!';',;V:',•;''''',`; '..:';'";' i'is!1;'''.s.,../..,.,Ti',. .,',,, \ 1/ /A.,! i i ,,..,,,,\. .,,,,,,,,,....c. ! \ ,... ..,..,:::::,:f...-::::-. ...,.-:,_:s.:-.:. .s.....,_. ,-,.:: ,......,;:;,,,,,,„ �k,;l.';I;'1; �r''. • '•• :��;' ="' A�101� �1 � .11 li,•,. �',14— ^`'.`_':'p'`/;,!',♦ /•_fm. 1! j # .J?; �4rlli;l 111 I; I .,,,:'.c.',,,,...-,.....; .;/ —;;;...;.,..?...it& I'' ....... ...,' ..,..;:7",..ii,,../ ./ ..,• „,/7,',J,'-""•...' .', ,1 ',Ili l',!1 ,'I ')4'c',, $ • j 1' f' •;+.,.,..t• IJIlld`; ,a " ,�" ,� +. :; it I /' uG I \,•rt,Ii,�,,,...t„i D / ;t t 1 „.„.i.4•24I° .'y .I. ,\ ,;5". `®''• `Il .'rv..,,:1 ` 1 i f ♦ i f 'i ---.,..........,..c, „, :.„ , ., . ', . .. !\ :-•::',',;.t,11 J.:;,.,.,., ,,:: , ,,.,\•,.• k'k:. . u "�••>•.I.��'_-_.,�a M.eIC�.�.Y��,�� ���.��i1��� •.Lws`Y��•.�t�ii�':I!L�4tos MillOIIIP'' ''' ii . Mom' � I IM " w AHBL1 f fig; Opus Northwest LLC �;R! - II ." 1 gill: 'free CalbeL.w CANN w.' lAper Moat*Road Tail c % ,: a 6 ow., Opus Northwest LIC IlIIs •"• CIVIL•STRUCTURAL - te �.soa N.SAO2a• w..,w.manluoa noaasnoo �•°`� ENCINEERSAPLANNERS ...rw o.r ...and %%a,9,t........r,..... „--z.•:•:,•••:••.' c.',':: .'2 III /'Of : • ••• ••.;;;0'.',-, ••-•-••'.'••'-• •‘,••• `• ••• ,!; '•!';.-';',,,s,.••••,' ..,....''' -•-'4---',-.1:. -- ..,,„. , •.:14.1"-''''‘i I,:' I ,:-/-..• .,- .., ,=,•-,:Y,:-,..--. .,''' ' .4, i .) : ill ig :.=yi .--'..•:,..,..: •:-:.-:- HH .. - .,,--V,t,:2---....-:-=.'-- .-' -...=;‘,"..,-*.. '::,•::‘- .,- , ,,, .,.;.'?.,?..;.,-- •,-:.-.......-. •- ...--. - •' •-•,,,..... - ,:-.,-,,..,-,- ,. ...',.',-., ,•;•-......0 IL... i :•::.,,,,, • .:..i.•:, .. .. ,,...,:i '';i l''',112 '''-?.;-•,:.-•:-• ',:-.Y!•,.,,,,-- -Y ,., , ... .. . . .. . . , . _• -- ....-,:: ...,.. , . .) • .,..t.,. .-•-;: •-•••.,:....-- 0.,,, .. .... ; ..:a i ,,-,•,., , ,-, ..„... ,,,,.„,„ • ..,... •. ••••• , , ..,' ,,....,.-„,..A, ...../ . c.• (.53.LOI)'4G WOO•PAY , .v.ottrti3hi i ' .., ,.;%\''.\\•••?•,. \ 7 7 7 r> ••••.' .,.\ ''''•f-' . ".4 -4 -,..? ,,,../ „.':•,,,,.- ‘. ; lau)oru ornal ; .,.."• ..•-7A !-•'.-"•:''':A•:'. • ''''.i..,-',!.1::..-F,. . .....*,•-•-. ••:•'...."•‘••';',:,!\,;',.. '''1•1: ..t. ...:,•:, •i':',-'..: ••••',..-:•:...- .2.-...••,-` ' ; s',..::::;',...:::::•!' '‘"-:''s:':-:• '.--- •---•-•.:-;.';';''--...', ' \. 'S.,1,::071! ° ''.. ''' rffln ...4';.'4,‘ , . i ......':'.4''...:::-..:,'• ', ....4;.',-..,..%4*.;-, , .,,, -4 • \ FIN ,„.. s, • ,..,.., . ......,:.. •,.:,:..,. ,,....-...,......-..„ ,..--,.-.-2-1-2'.‘A ‘:•'..".....''..'..‘4,;.;.). l'...4.;- .',4.' ''s' .. ''''• ,,1-,..1'';').',..;;;.1:T. , / ' . :: -.-'''.'..':...• ,, .:....'S 4 ...'::'..,":..'".....'.' ",‘ ..'*::,:';° ''......',„'.4:.. .n. .-\' ••• ' '''''',-,'Is'''' •• ...,-,-.--:-/--:„- r •••••••11::..':',''•; :•' ,.:'..-...,Z,••• . ..1.v../ ' ./,','..-.`.'...'.'... .....1--",- 1 ' ... ',:<.-...• '.• ' . ‘:,------ `.-.--' -:::.--. :.,,-'f-.-....-:.:::•:::f-....:,,-F..*-.,,,....:-..,j-,-._.4,4,'.?..,2-,,-.-,44 ,- . ., . ... .' ... .'jy,V4',....':'--„..;:::'........ • ' N ', '..---.. '.......,.. ,2-'7 ..*;:;;)''',";,:! CO ;-,44:,,,,,zz,,:--,--;•;;U:- .F.-14,...--7-.';:;'..:',.:"!,:::-."-:: .:1 ---i--:::...--rtTY.::-H..2_-'23.::.i-.-... "--'_,..7,F,':..?..`. 4",g,.....-.."..f...........,';-.4-4,:-:'.,:...,:,i;t::,.,L,,,„-., !%•---•••• ;?::•-• ;.,, `...,'":.i.„„?...., „,.., , '•›,.. • •i.:-.-••••i,..,:.`?!....•:;i:74•,,-•ir.•'.'T=.-',:ii'..1\s'&4`. ;•i-4.-------.--..-.'-,-----.::••••'-'7::.,:.:.-.::.-•••:-.:•.-..7..--:•-,•-7-7::--._.:2-7-•.---;••••7 7.,•••-'•-:•A`.••fr•-•-7 -t• tIt'3''';•••••,.....--:R-' -,1:-.::<:,,,:;::i7.4a.T...:,,f,-.,_-:.,...t;„.. .- z.,.,,,,,.,,:-:::::"Igt.5qi.,:i.:,Ltz:qq•aVi,4';';.,6.:i:.,7..,TO.':----..;4.-.L.:±-? - . 2'::.:..........::.-..;',..:',.•,'.......l.:i....4-y:,:-.. '44., .:' - ,t .,,,y..),7,,,z' : g=1 )110110.. • • 4, 0 i.. , .... 1-"7:7.7.-411:Fi'.. .);'::::::.---1:-. :::::::,..-,-...g.;,,:---.4-1,,,Y::::.,:i4..---,-,...,,,,,:".":4:2:'..i'..-..- -:,!..•;2.5.,..,•.7-.a•F::••-.,..,-';'-s,..•:,..",--:K'ff!•:,: ,•;":.,:';',.""!'-f!..--.•:• •••;•,-;''•-'••!•• •-•,•,"!,'''''.-..-.-4'-'-',..,•-.4Z"-..,---/p.ti...E--• '''-s..-::.1!:::-. ..7.4.V.---- -- ito''....J'.;.::::%;.....P:::::::-4•'•3:.i.:::•:-'7...5.-;-:'..--.4.-jr.tA*';r:i41-if':.Fyigjil':"Tqi:-..4'--.94tH'Ii:.1*---7-.r.-'','..;.4T,i-',...t11-;T,..-''ff*--5?..i. ::':5,-,.!'1''''',.i---1.7-g -::':,;:;.jr.1.3.'1E47.'44;41..-4;:''t;-.;.:-''..-'°''':-''''..'-',:-.4.724 ',,,...„ Diii;:f.:-•;!. .:: •-,_..',....::.,.;, :%.44,",:7-i..:.,:',: -.'52.1-f4A;4-.1'.."'-'4:i.:.:. ..-.'.:4-,_.---•,:r..g.;..41::ii-.,?;ti'..i .'il:4.:;:.i... .4''.4.'7A.!44.:\'‘`:':.;._'t$1.,441.-_ .--!;:,-2::Y;.-.4:-;7449.?..-aitf,<:::-."s'''''.....;;;iladrilliz..144:..%.,'--sal' ' ''''' .:1 [,':-'''''''"'"' •' • ..7-Sittrani:".:--'4'::;.--4.,,';,-.5::;'4;g4:4-'!t"1.`. .f.1;.Ji*:."''''-'.':43'5!\V.V.::'11''.41.--___......,--,7'---- , -;-,,,..''. . __7...k 'I 2-.7.'1\1\.'',\.."..s,, ::',....„,,,,,,.;:,.-::::. ;_fr';:::'''..-:'-'''.1„t-:':::"-•-,.--- , -, •,--.•• ,,,,;:1,-,...-,,c..,„•,,t-,,.......,..,,,,\,-,1••• ,._._, .., .,,A,,,,,,',..f,-,:,.•;•3I•Mi,-03T,:if:.!;1„...1 -,,,,!:•-•:,,:•:-.,;•:is,,',--..-.1!;!:".:-1•-',---,'-'-'!' .,,„:- ""'`P.F."--- ,_....,_4„,,,„,,,,;.7iki..*Atilff, :•:",,,ge,‘1 I i i 'i 1.v-7.,;'• .-:',„ 0''•••••1':-:44,'5aw-••••e•..-f--,,,I•,,,,-------..-....-g,..:•:_r4,,,•-t, ...__:--,-z-4.:q...,,\-\,,,-,-. :4•• •.0,',,,,,„,,.,0-..--7,K,6 It,.''ii yY.';,:,i•!. 5•,,.'i Fr',.l 1 'X."''.''',I.,:,,,Vii...,;,11-1!..n,..,:„.,-;,(..;;) I -,I., j'e,:..:,,r. .1: '1A,..:1";',I A ..'::^.C-7.''''--.• --.4,-'''-.P:ir-.6:.?1.,,f,. .,q'Xis '',' ''1 '1,1.'1,,p-..•:,:,...,,,, ,,,,,:045.,,,,, :,,,,,,,,,,,,,";:,..,,,,,fie .,q•*...:.... F,:„....'1.:. r ,-'... ' - :-,),2, le ,,,.,,...,.. ,,,,.. . -,,.-,..,:i...,:f, .., ,,,,,,,.1.x?,,,mc,,,,A-..,..4-1.k‘-eiv,:*.e.:,,,e,ot.-7.:,:.;,-.:i. „..2.•..,.-:-:::-...\.,s.•...,'":. ',1,.,1 ,;.-,• Z ....-- .,,.'',...?•4,.!..,,,.,•,:,•,4,- '40.0;\ 1;41.-\ ,...V4,1,,,,,AV,,,,,,..ft),Kep.,ira'ii,,,,..$,A,tre gel• .1/,.....:A.'.:...Z.V‘..tX ',..:','i n 1,:'.2 CO -.1,,,,,:.,_ •.' .)'... , \ \\0::.;.;r:A%- '',i.•',:i.,44-4.t4:..':::.-464.*Altg.-,(:,7'=::-.-:l ''.::. ,..\:',•::::::An.S::-:Avi:IA ,:-]'-: 4.1.2- x_ ,.... ,,...,,. .,..,,,,,,,,,,,..0,,,,,,,,..,.\ .,•-, ,...,--:,,,,,•.... . . *.,-..m- 4,7,,,,,"...wIt.,).,ivo„0,,e.;,-4:.,,,,A :,11..c,•,\\\"41..!!!Iiil /,,,e '.,,A:: ",,.., ,...•:,•';',„"-,...,1k' 4 • , -' '"''''[•'.."Trith0v-W..,.:i.t., -,1.7.3 -3-;...:',0:,v ,,. .,, ,",,,..4-k.s:-....,...,.....!..::: ::•;"'...---co ge,:k lk*•,-.:`i\... '••\ A','\''.'.v..,4:.'.zi.-.,:r.-....-.:-1,:.-:•--:.7Z, I ''''-`.'1':`,..',.: ',.`'..:A, . „,.,,,,,,.2,.„„t„,,,41 , . , • t ,, , , i ,,,,,,,,.„,...„,„•,,,, .,•..‘,....t.,.„,„.,_........,.....„ ,„:,._••z z.„.,•,- -i,?:•,,,,,,,,•,.,,-;,,;,.•i,; !:„,„.,•.,;,..• I, ,. ..\ • -,i'i 'A'...\\ ....-....,..----1.19ntirt•''..,..z.-•:-••••:',--:-.,,,... 10'.',';,,,,,`,/ f'' •-•c:i.',-,,,34,,'ir,,,,,0• -F':D...\ ''', \\ \ '•'• '4,..i.Y:''.,..\"111W_Iirr.,7--.-^-Na. -''','•i* .... 8.1....mggi G ,1'; 1..'•';j•'.' , /,,,,,,Q f-.vY-.,!:,,,,"•:=,,,,";,:;:,,,a. -•c.':-•<•••- . • , *+ -• r '‘'•'P.,(...m,A,'',-q'";•• 4,-' ;Jill!! ,•,• I ..,--a-•:•;V-!-••,-,"!--.!•;.--,!'-..-••• .'" .,•••-',, ; .i, !' ••"'-'c•,''','-'3,„'-'114;:';',-.•1'''',Jill 1 I '1•: '--- ,-.;i„.,.?•,,,•; . I „ .7.,,'.4•,;'1,,o,',,V!.•1A-;;-4,,,i,...a-,....,...z,.. ,. - -, ;,i- ! v.,,i. --,,,:.,,,.cav;',,,L4p,,,,-...--- F i,„...i I Z iii s 1.:1 Illig°1 I .,/,,. , /."4-.'V',..A.'5,i' d /pf '''.0,' ,a••%,,...s. ',....•,,,`..,••'''-",,...,1!",,•..0- 'ii J a)CI i ii li i.•, , •,. '442y7.:'.1,,t ' I, , , -,-,11111.11. .• 4 i I *.%.:1:;!:::.::•'..::' /,,'„',.::-.,.,4.'P'..,C.....if.: i ',.'1 ,./' ,..‹.../....././,f'.4(..1 1.;,5,----7-77,10Iftri;r4,-; 1-.)..1.;;:..4-::.-i.:'. / 6'Ai.-IS:::'°.f.;'4 : •\''‘iii,/1 :-' ..'7'''.1:'.,...,./ '.',:i ',"'. !V.,;;;;;.i.*....:00F&'''''''''''' 11 " ::•t: :../ ,/,'..;k4:AZ:i'',I):,..,:i / - ' ' '' ' ' ' • ' '""''t?t.'"'''''''' ''''''" ' * j1/./ r-f" ,•'.../ ...4-7 i ,,'... " •,- , -••3',:!U',;'''..7...Alf';'''''MI 1 i; ..... , ,-.•,,,,., .,, _„, 1. p% ... , ., , , , . ,... .',,*::Qt.PT,Ake.";',',... . We 1 1:" • mi. ' ,A.!,1,14--, ;.;,;,;;,' :4 ,, . 00 ',/ ,,' ,/4 , / ,'• ,• ,:,,• ,!"-!4'..ki•'',;kii•fr•a••4`,',..%-Flea I, 21. ,. 'I - ' ,,,,,i10."?..-;,,s?..*4.-: - i.,. 4.. i ,,.....• ..; t./ .•",-;'A *.,' . ,WIT',i..i.4-,14.0p,:9‘... I ',-;g•--•- ,',,,,,,,k-V.0..'•-,;;a4i,',,,,,' .=,•:-:' / ....,.•.,:•••... /i , j", , . ;--.4.:;.- ';',-,! ','::;--,;''•'-- . , , • -- ,.•'•.M.'•;:i!,i'i'',/,'...,40-‘,;-•isa •,-!! / ,..-!,, /..',..?'! ! ! •., ,,,n,. ,,,,,-7••-•:- .1#4,14 g-ti,V Ali ! ''. ;.• " .,,,„4:f.,"0„i•F,,TA ,',4!?.0,;;':. . ,',,:;,-f i ! i -,..,• ,/ 4lizii,-.1.0M.,..,.Q2s,.?..,1 NI /AA".:':'-ka'2'1. ," ./,••''' ''', -1; I. 1 ,..i• -'.. ,• •kleig-3-14Witef`r•'' '''' ., .\•‘I.;'s / -4.4.2V -..- ,.a.• i,15,it; ', g . ' ' ", -t .-''. ; -,-ii .',' .- ;•,-!,5• •••,-„gl-V.!:4!.4,',.!""I .:•-i-,;•. ,,- - . ,,',1,,,h,:.-.* IV.,..:..g.t.''•a•-"Te..?..: ---:9;' . ,,, - • ' ' • , . ...!1'.W.Z.C.:4-...R.i.,.:::::.;;:-.4.-A:2.:;21 1-,, 2 1;,.. .-.' ;/..,,,,!,-4,„ -;,*f',,`t.,;:i;;:-,%.4.,V.k,e,B.''' ".- '• k,,, .., \ , : ! f,,, ., •. .2!;'''"-'•••• • ,.; 0.20,-?.4:1;i2,;Z;. 1 A • ..., ., ' ! ., ;) ' ', ' ,Wit,...'''V''...A;',•'''P','-.Pgf.•§•.`,--,411111.-, / •V--.--•. ' .,..:'''.•,`,W,:.?:•,';‘-rOZO,.,::..1;1'4,RRA:.'-r•VVi'.': - ,..••.• ", •1 •;,t 1 . 1. ! - \ i:1,41:7,-..•.,L,'-i'sY.,t,i7,!N'..'/••.A1 ,.,./ /1'-7. ..- ...,•Y..:ki,,:a-•:),'4,";;',';,.:•,l'A.'"6.-;!Aks...'4','"...A•''' '" ''' ,f , \'' i •,, ‘ ..;; '-• •,. 0.14,%>'l-f.t.',Gtrf.'.11 t -'"" --.:,,,aq-,,A3•15' --,Ethr'•:;-•?Lf- -"k-Tr-n, -,',-tc.z.•:;)e,•,-,.,,, A,-. .• , , , ,,.:-.••••. ,'‘ A . ••• 4,--,,4.-N,-,,i.?;;:z,•,,,,,e,:;•,,:•%, •-•--.1 .., • . ,. .. . ,. ... li'•'k'''')'---•-- -- .-,;';',C"gb:W.::?&::"•6f7 tl,,,,:''-'••gi•-Pf'.:-;_t!'s' ..-- •-•-.. 2:;,...., •,, , , \ ,./ --.. •. , 't:'N't7.I';-4-,.-14''.:-1.'41 ,, '- . ,..-,, • - '•':-•--i'p-••••,,;3•54i4::Ms,•:,,,•:i,,"4-,--;->z•..,i..,,,,i,Vq:i;if,-,,,,;-..'',,-',,•*1;-:• ' :, ---; • u. '„ ...•‘•.• • •••.. ••••••.. ',0;t;', •):-.1o:i4,;,:;)•‘,,,•-•,;„: ,,, ' •-:.2 ,-'',...,'„''''''''• -;,->,'','1',g/P:•A;gliti,A,!la.tii,A,.:1:-,5;,,F64,0,4.,'''.. :,''-• '',..',,•--•-••--,•*"\ •,, '.....\,."‘. '.1i:'., ',." '.-•ap:'' '';:Nit.).:".4PIVV!1:,e1 i 1: .. \ \ , , rz: •'., ''••",., - ''' 7,,'":0.,'.:.!..1':',??5,;...t0•L'',.1,V.'":ail 'I IS'''. ...;.•-.111NBM•''.1....',:::','''''..iks1;:' .4,,;'...•''.1•':4..''',;4'0,i,.•,,A,•••‘RAV..„\\'•:.klq?):Z-.,:!•-,.",..'4"i!''' i r'•-i...••a.t,.. '.'•••‘. \ • ', '` '''''' •••... -". R.:(5. •-•'`ea'' ''''.:'•'':!-Vg0•••'-T.!:;:::.--"! ,1 3 i ' k''':-..i";-'-`;';:'-42-:',....!!. --.41 .,••'.'•,"'''•-P' tr'1:,.;;.,../1--.„,,h,„:„..„-_,<..„,„,„:„.„4„:„.31-- ... . .,., ,. ., , \ ..,.. ... •• .. - \144...-„,...:,,,.,,...-.1,,4,..„.•-.,,..- - .-i,,,,,ikEgs.;:,.*-',4:, • ' `''',',,,,..,A''')AV,"'P',',:Th,, . ,,,: :,,,.,1,,.,.',":',...,,,,!..„",_...?....k.,;;;;;;:::.,-,44,,,:::4z* .44301,......_- .._ hiv:......,,,,,._ ,_____...,,,,, 14 i , , : y ,,, ,, f-', \ ,..--:E:•".. :.:'•',.%,".•••''','''•-••''''''''' ''.. ''.` ---.---..:. •'.••.!'"'-••••:"..--.......t1) ,,,,„.._ 7.-- --7"1,111 --''' ''"7-'7'-'•4'-'1,111 ''''''', ' , ! /./\ •• \ .•-• g ‘:,, 1,,.-1R..!,, 1 e: ..:[ ., n.;.. ii-''''•-••-...',..v.:;:,-71.1•\;')'''''• .. ' -"4,114-7--•'---,.:::-- ,..... .4 ,...__----=---_,_ _,:.-=..------ittttvialixr-E's%- -- _ • '-'-•:--f:-• ------ / A j.ff' '*•"`...-‘;,,,,,"."-1.27 ' . .. ' .4 • • ttt75,.:,-,-7;-r.:•.•• .4...ga rEVANIM:fit_i7''- N xt , , 44,,w-,.*.,,,-.-:;i:•-7 12 t;',,:v-_.0.),.._.:-,.. •,......- -,.....- .. ,-,,,,,'A ...);;:-,._•„,------- ....._....,_.: ..'-',:°:'zt!...41..‘,14 ::::-.--'` ,-.,?.'.':.'?i ,.-:,t.''',77'..1.:').-;.•.:7:-.:•,':::;-..,:::•,',-2,:i!:***F-.--.-g• .... .. ,- 1 mil 00011... .. 1 . - t. P t If : Fig; Plafro. Opus Northwest LLC Ng 1 . - ''' "Ai. .(t,,.',.po.. , AHBL, Upper Non*Rood 1 lili ,,,.. ,.\---* .,-- AHBL CIVIL fa STRUCTURAL 0 9112 Grail Pim Oh X • .,/' ENGINEERS•PLANNERS 14- I umb a 1 k q ow, Opus Northwest LLC •,,,,-.,"'-lf,V,,,'V.'-'ent.-„.=-• ,40.4134100 _ Mt Data Ma Ames IIE 6.111.PM dew.WA 11054 Itsrlmko• If I \..!....!...,•-• ...,,:.?4'.•:••:-::-.:.•':',i.--,' ./-,:,',.::•::'•'' ,l‘'.'-'c' ". ,••••'-:'•-,;--;43'..--:-••--•''' , ,'.•••••‘'.-' -. ..,•fk:''•i: ,4/1 .;,c‘;‘,:••• ../,..g.'...,;.';'','7:::•-•3\!'-'!..,...--il.;.:..;:••-•',...!...',,`2,:::',' .,-.-::: ....•••• ,''..„:,"-.!,,c"`.:',..,:.'•,Z--..,,- , .- ..... ,...."...::•.•• ,... , ._, ;.& • ! '' ell, ...,.,,, ,.., ;•-•,,' .., •i.:: .. "2 „s,',.5.-;:... .., :".„::::."-....';•-•:'-'..-.•.:.':/'.. ••:.'''''l .." ‘''''i 1! "i',i,-....!,- ''',;',?;,',...:;!........... ,...--. :j. l', i.i,;16 ',,,tyri•r.,,,..c. •••''' !'„r'1', .: •':; .•;(i..r 10. . ••''' .4, •• ..` ••l•l'r 1. .fi'''':•;,, -4\••,• ,,,,,,,,;y,..:,::::•...:.-: ,,,, . - ..,.......,‘ ••-•,..• , .;.;',...,:.:,..,-.:,-,i,.,..;'.. , , .. ... •....•: ... , , •-•,....-:,. .';;;;:::::,;;;7";#' ' ..' ." ‘.'‘.y''. (snot 1074•.ta sworo.VW! i :•. ' ''.- -,.\',.;\ I a a . • -.:. ,i.i..c. ‘.;-,;,;:\,. e p p .••,,..:,,,,..,,.. ",,,,,,,. . i4.It -.. •.';',•:::•••••';', . ..',,';'•; ., •,,-A , -tf,! . 1, . , !,,V•;.•••:-..:.V. tau)ons '.A ••••: ...,-.-.:•,'" -'5':',. v.,''.!j::.J.! fatell3a S.......'2., :!;..-. •.'•. N.\ ,.. FE • .••••••.„.,.....,.:,.,••.:.......,.. . .--...,..,...,...,:,,,:.,..,-•., ,. ...,..„, :m.,• ,..,.,.,.•......,.„‘ oil „., •..„ .,:..,.....::.7,..:-....:s:,......, ,,. .:',-.,.....:,,:.‘:..•.:••::::.:::::::::;:•,,‘...z.,,,,'--/•:.::.,,.,.........,\••,,•:, ...,-;.,..::.:::....,;-.:i.k ,.,-4'.....: --- -;•,,,,- ...,. , ,...,„. .. „•.(:,:•,......j.' ‘,....-",-,, \ , ,..,..!--....!....••••.,:,..,.."::•••••:•:•::•.•C..:••••,•:',......•*1.:'.,' .' ••••*/—• ,",$ ''-'•:.-`'..•,i.`"';--"-,..' - ''', ''......' `\‘•'"''"'''';`,Z:-",j:.',',!•J fo...::•.....,! .. .,,,' ,./',.:."•;...••••:',..!•!..*•:.:•.'''....,.....'•:: . .: -.•1/ -•• .' .s' ,•.,\‘.0:14•4.,--..:••• i ,.,•°' \- '-'...•:. `..-'"-. \ .„. `,`•,'''''''`::-'''r''-:-.•-••,:-7-7--`--i!:,_-.1-- .',•"•,,••••,.,:::`,-'''"•-•-.,-.7!...::::-....:',:j...z........-...,--• .„ .,:.'..-r--.,.,..;..--.4 --. ....,!•,',.e.•.. .:.-','•,.-,:g. . '.,„. II:, ..,..,..,:,: rn :L.:.••••..-,,, ,,„•?,2,...,44.,.,,,t,..._;„.„.„,.A.,„,„..,...:F„....:•.•;:_••:....„-.---:,......:;,_-.........:,:,..,...,,,...-..,••-••..,..t..,--.:„.- •,....•......,...;,,,„,•.4,.-.,,,.......2%,,,i0.,,,74:.,;:',1;$".:-...i. !".:1..f.:•,...?,..:•,;;;,.: -,,!!,,,, ,,,..:,•,..„, ;••1!,..•: 0 ....,,..:-.,•.„:.;.5•:-.;,ikis4,,,,,,,.!•,;.-R,....,5T,,,:g10.1!,:,'-•,04..;i:,,-.;;-.i:-,.:-:i.:,-;;',:,..-,..;•.3-,!.. ,,,-:.F.'... ::::i"..,,,,-..,:e.,,,:::,-.:-:"-.....--:::.-::7.-:'.',.....::-::::;...,...:.;,?.... .:: ::,..';':',;,:- ..-i--•;.-,'.%•:':',••• ,..Z•••,..-.'..‘'.:.=.• ,,'',":•,,..,P " , ;' : m.II , .,:'•!••••,:".. .''.:[,;:':.'; T:-.-'1'.',..'2.,,'- ',..;.'.::'3,5f..:- ...f.,..gklit"kif,j,n,-;,,;?-:7J'sa§-2,',.;;C;'3,ji.:';', ..-f,..7.::.E.-..:.-:::.-a3°7-'.:!" .:.:•.:"", ;•:. •::.-•';;;-.::::1.•,..:. .'jri.:•.:-.;...:1,••_.•,;::: --::::'..,;':,... •••:`.•,:.'...,..,..:,...\.:,,,:.,, ,.,'m ';....'1;;?... -gT,77.7-.."E',-2.-;-• Fili. :.•-•:: -;..V..i .:::-:- .5.0.2i3t.RagM:r:.1.1.-:-Wi.!:',F.Ist,Ve.':•,..:;f.•;,.;:'"--:::::".;::: -.."':-:':"!:-:."-f"?•';';:112...::"-i--- -; ! - •••':::'‘li:?•::' • " ;'''.•''.'.1.. lifli :LT:,....: ..wM 3.,....,.,,,.,. ..i.- ,•.-r_f.:-.:::::.::-,tr:,....,17... ..,-zi .'-,J.-::::, :f::1 .-'.?.,RI!.°.,:-;•;:f-f-• ...,•:.gi.:1-1*.,f;:;cW-: ,,:-..•.„v;..;1`:,..i:;'-,-. .. 11 . . . -•.: ; .',"•, • .. -2,,.. : -',..•.:.;:,,.....:::•: :::..-;.5:,_.--- in.5".;4;:r4 ::g:7-Y.,ii;4-:? :::?:W. :7::1701,.-:•;;;':..t...!„.„.4, , ...girsliomr... '' l, .:?.-..,;-, E-:-.•,...-,---F,-- ;;...9;;;-7.-s :,,--,-,.-="-_--------'-...:.'"••••.,::•4j.r,,f-.''---:"-;• •••',:;•'''•"''''•'''' '''"'?•--;?;-':'''.W,-',''41-'4 ,,,,' ....R, •;,?.c,. ‘s!'1151010210M111M151,...--, a, ....„....‹.....,:......., ... ._.....„.-2,;:,2•.•:.z,ss:„...:_..„-,......,,. ..•••)... .72-._7,....„; ......,.,;,, ., ,,,,...,,i_-----,::,..,!...7.,,,,214: "4,g.'4,;;;:,:::,',,... --- ........,- 4 4. . .• 4:•,.. ,:•::',-.:•- '' ,- 1.---. . --',,,.,-,•••:4,-1:0,,,,-A7„-'-‘4-..r.1,-44:'•';'•AIRZ,Vo,•!‘• ... _ --- - __-...-i.- ...,:.,... .,_.,,,,:,_•,,,,,vgA„.„...:-.,,,... ..-,,?,,.,.,...,,-.-.;:::,,,44..,,9.'s•:',-,--'''''" .. -(1, - ..... .. ,-....--,.7•11,.,,rf , .ns.tt f, ! 1 ;,,,...i,i'l. ,"' . ...:'"1 ':. 0 .;•-,'S"-Y•••';-,,••••!'"t".•••,.":-''''...1.'. --...T-4y.ilf.fiki. -..7,....,-.-..ipt,N*!;•;•:•... :' ,i,' '.\V111:-'V4 ea tjt,..10,;,,f1,-1.4,'••,,J',,'.'•6.••• ''' , I 7 F.4''','.71.C.:Ing eitji,l'Q'-e'';f,f.'4V,) !'F:2 Illff , .. ir •,.. , V* ) \ I, L ..\, .,,,.,, , I . , 1..''.'1 MK lk%..2‘\'••',2'.''.\':‘....'•••: i 1,;,'.4 1 ‘7.}.:., Z _ ...., ..':....,:, *0.••. ,1!;!,,',..‘'„ .., -; -IS\,, e-4:,51:1. ,,,,.-LL.,.i.,,,,„0:., ,,,A,-„,„0,;iko a, - ,..Q.,::;•..\‘',.,‘•::::::.•;.,\;,.,,,.,.; k. V,. ' .•tN' , ,;:i01§',.;,'N'ilt,.4',,',„4.74,,Iftg.g-,`,„",!',7,7.‘ '.1.,.\\.‘..i‘,.\\,\.\‘.‘,\,\.\,;:fk.1 i::'• t ,.!•:••-p = . .. '...,, -,....4::,..•;,..;,.m., ,,att.-,,,c.:.. .;.41:z..4.m.4,--.:.-.,'„ ..,.4..;\;.,\,..\., -ep .::;../s, •'. ;:. , ;-.4\.\ ,ik,';;,.4,,',,::1,-,i,k. ::.440,,,:;,-,,y,&,,,,,....,..,,p...,,,•;:;„ \‘‘....:.\\.,.,.:.,..;1,.;1,1111 ; ii , • , • ‘ , ‘. .,j;,,,,,,,,,,i.,,,,g,,, ,,,,,ii.o.,,,,,i;,,,,e,,,,,,p,,,,Af?..;i:p.4.i. ...\.,.,',',,.,,,,, •,./..:,,, - ,,, ' ,,,A ., ,,,*,,4,,,,..,,,,,,-".444:i..tvr,`,4:4,-,i?.:7,,f.7•S't:t.l.f..?..4.1,v.k\''\\\\ ,,Itr:7-:•-:-..:F:':::•-';'2'11!-.7....1 CO .,i i ! , • i 1 . • ' ''...,- , .4441e4;\. %•,\\•••'.."',-, ,:.--7':•"':- ••-----..ac MEP rt N.i' -.:V: ;,,_ t .1. ING - "-iii, : ; : \ ,. ..„,.,. „4-.4.4„,..,,,, , ‘,.‘....,.....:„.„......:..-..::„.•...::.:-,... ,4,4",,','34:-,,',b,'•.':' IP\11 ,X,,1,,\• i , i ., ,.„.,, ‘, .4. 4., ,,\ \.,*:-'''''.3,\ ...::.:,,......:•••:•:.:,•,..„...:::::';';:....F:.:41:'..-":Z.'.... ..Z1 a ,:44.HV,,,:..1'.I:A.,-•-•Ir.,.I.:,-11,f.,.;;:-.-...,;:'":'',.. i ,,,.,..e,:7,,,,i.,;•,.,1,.,Z:...'.:,...,4;...3'•.„.„.4... '.,,‘,., \ ,. \...,.."4 V:...a..,:1'..\\ !.,.''''''''''" '".„,it''''.,:';'Z' ....:;.k.tft• '''. "1•1!'•; .',••/' /mgm G ,i.,,,.....,,,• - : , ,,,A,...., ,.,... -?3.j,•••-,.. „-,,3:- ii 1 1 21:'°11°I 1 ,•„;::::.;/.:•.,,,-,.:.;,,..-.., i. . ,. „ ,, ,,. -e-• --;,....c4 ..' :I 111 3 NI i 11111 _.•11„ '5} r i i !' ''''" ''' '.--—I•I t-,::",W.VAP,ai , :si•i, fn) ., i, D..' I P. , f'",:- '44•••••(4 - I .....,‘, ,..',•:.?:'!,.'.....::,.....,.:;..?.'i /;if!1:1,1,9,, li /'..,;•‘' I if.,;'!?.;f:::::•:::•,•:'...:',...;.. ,•;S:,',:,,t);11',',7,„':':,.•',,,,.'' „:.•' ,..,:::;'../.1.•11'.1,../ .___.14,;•41,,,,,,,t1,4:-.iti II ..:; ,: ,•.'..:,31.f,..-...4:- i /:',.„:"Air_._‘...,. /:'.'.,,,• ..1' ,, ..' ...,•••,::;r." . ,. V..'.' Aff'f i2f. - ,,./.12 ,/ ... ' .;./,/,...'.'7 ... .•.,,-,,i;".,,,'-'; 340AW. -.... 1 .1 . . d. . .,.. ,, , ,„„ , ''•'''''4'''''''''4'''''''Pl.'• ''• / I.' ,.,..,,...A .f. • a 1 11 116 '' i ''i i / '''. ' ''''','''''-'. -'-4P-5,,/,'. 406 'i.:/'-41,.'' ::.$M,':'.,f'''4i,., / ..11 ;‘. ,..' ,...'' '.?.e,.•,.."'l ". ,,',,,.A.:ag:ir,,..,,,,7,:i. ,-, 4 . . : i ,,' /i / ,,,' ,i,'''' ,.4;,,5'5f,',:!aigiVtp,.„,•••••.• I; . ..' ,,, ' •ir.4, `.."1!.. ..,';`=';, / '// "- / ',.' ." !/ / ,',1 -• •:1'.,..f'4,i'!?0`..•.";6`gi''''.--` '. 't--.; ' ••4:,-....,•-•• , . -,,!,,„„,'SA:N..tr..,',4'1.4';.-",-;, ,e,,:.!:;• ,' ,..:`..,:.';.J../ ../I i .' . ,.:(. , .4i,4 .5',' 77• ,/,'Pes4 is ,',''..:.-.7"::'' /,' /. ,...:.5'''' .:.....4,i ; ' ''''' ' .' ''. .,., 1 i i ..1 -'' • . ,,1;r't ,, .`..'-g. -,;,f&i, .../ . ,..: ! --:, i i i I,, ,• ty,yik•4.7•1.1f,„K;!.st;;„i:JA 1 1. ..,.•. .• /,•,• ..',••,e,g,',;'f...,.:,.,,,,i'.g;' .•:,' / .,:,:, : ,.1^! ! ; V .,. ,,,....,-. ,....„---,V.,%;•',.., ..,..4,,f .;...: !•,..mg,,,,,c. '. • ..,,:i, -, , -,.,15,1,L,,V,,,..'.,-ri:V.7,,,1,,k..q.,, ' ..",-- , ?"" ! , , I; ...• , 4-' ,r"4; ,,,,---,',,..-,e,A- 1 '1;' .'.:".',,',.,:‘-. , . ' '. ;;;-yk'l.%'0,‘,' .:!,,X14,'..,.-T•n'‘ 0 if.. 1 '.• g• ,, i -*-7: .., ....,, • . I'.- AV..:•;4.,'.4%:i":;.V:5,1,..t-i, !.j. i A I...;•••: i -- ....!• ../ .jgzir..,,,,,,.,,...,,,.4kg..,-4,,.....1. , , , '-, ';‘, \ i i /,' ..' .' •.0&,..1..:.!-. .,M•11-:IA ' ',,''i -.1., i . I . .: ,,,, ,,,.„„g„,,,,,,,0 mf..,,,,,...,44, ; . , . ...---.,. _ , . . ,-,••-•:,;s4f!-F-.,-Vk ,''.,,qe'ir.',..e!.:',04.-Vg' ••••-. ''‘ . .; • 1 1:Ver•`•:'!:-*Vakki-!.-',..T.I %; / ‘',,,-.--- (-- --1 •...4-!-ti,N.'4,;`J.'.4-.60.V.i.f-ri;IPid ...‘ .:;'''',... /.., \„.:'-•., ; I I: 1 ..., 54+1-44V.544%,,.:,.'A , t , ,v .--- • --— 4i-'-f.--R-0.--,,ir, ,,, . --,,s44:-.,z,-,>4.5-f,,,,,?;-1, , \ -.... , '. • , 1 1,<,:,. ::.k. -..., ,A,,,,Y,);;;;-, p,„..;,,,:,„:„.:0'q.';.,4,,, 3, , ,. , 4„,• . - i.,'''V.''',i' 4 -"•"-,11,F41,,,"qe,:k:,-,1.• ,,,, - • ,. .. c, •. •, - •."..-1.g. : •g.:: ,;,,,,itt,i, „..--. ,•'' •4•-•-•-• . --•-•' WAV.-pgi'':',:s,p,,,,„ •'',:•,594: ','? .A., ', '''' , ', , , 1 7, --... . ,,,....,4i,.5,2.. '7e),,,,,,*,,,.00f.r,...t, . ,.'. ,, -...,,,,,,. ,..„,,,..,,,•.. . 1.,,pii",,,e• ,a5,3';•'•?;;,??..•;,,•-•'''••• -k: ' •••• --'1, `,, \ ', ., ‘...•• ". ' '',.. C.4&a,,--,',7k7.4‘,.•.,A,w-,' •..igo‹.',4,4•,:•Lf.','N: ,,:,,,,',',,,,,;.'41,,,,,,,',;•6:41,.. "4;43 !. • .. gi,',AcriN'AVV.*A,*.:. - , ,..,---,..-.1 '., \ .., \c‘..,,,,x-•••••• .:•'. .52 i ,)'...:::';Yftitraf..;; 1 i'1.).,.:'...Fi.6! ',,n,':",.,g.A.M,FAI.4;.,;c:::;';.;";g ,. v•• i', '', \ '''. , ....,F. .... .'-. As,' ,t-,1,L.„4,4440 ig,:a i 1, ..:7':;,;•tv;V: ,„"'.':,:f4r'AiiaCv ':sq"g-.'7.7;17 r''''Ii:. ''. \ \'.. ',/.., .',. ' ''1-' '.g lg.;,;k0;.:!?,y'ALV,k4,7,,,; • • ',. "' — ' 24 .-,..`,.:',0',',..g.'-i,',9-.;:'''''" -tRe'.ti. ;\ ' % , ',,. ',, '.. •%, ig rj."-`7..:0,7,,,ligti-4.4:9M ,,,:!,,..„,, ::5.- ,Att.-,,,,,,V,:, -.-:-4 il if 0,,, ,,,,;,` r;;Ty;'•.,,,,, .. \ -.,,,, ', , •-""'4.,ci,i14&:4.V.$1 ,, •-,.........:„..,•7,.;,,,,,,,..•,,4 •. _."0........... ,--_,•• ,,,..,••• w ••••._ °I ,: : , ; . .,, • „ . ....,,,,:,,, ..,,,_•,0,•FA,,O;Ofk . .,'.. ,, ...-',, '"''' '01..,';';',.•,',",,krtr,''". ,'' . ',', '' • • ! ! .'..' ..,_ . .'. ', ''' .1 fl i•..'.",•?.itt`i`, ti'.. 1;, ''' P.- .„1:...g,,, ! , .. ,...., , s ,., , (,•1,..,4 1J ...,-...i t I I, ",,,,_on,-.-,; .,/ ,4,,,,,,":-'....:=P-4-::, • ,,4;70-!-- -.......::::::-....,-,=-7... ------;,----- • ::•:',..',,, 1111111111M4 ''•-,:aff.-..z.. TR. ••t riraffEIWBOSES., _ :'.6.':.14.,-ft',-..' ,..,,,e,.,,,,,,,, ...,.;... ,. ,, ....1 .__,-;‘,..,,..ra ,, Allbskir.... • ' -$33fle---1,7,i4Zf'• . ... . :„. ,4 ..).-...•.- -,-,7;1-::::-.1:4"--7:5:7_11,•-•,g77.•:.-,_._-_-::,,;A,,,,z6:.;_v..,,..,-..10.7.-,17.::,-._:-:.,:" 7,',,,7..7.....-4:',,'"::::%:-T..--?'-'''f,..--,-F-....t'H.7-;:':::.•,'::--,--. '-v:!:.f4•...,-•-,-:.. •"7—...--...,,,..7._:.,,,,,,,,,,:f.,4.-'•••-••.4t2v.`•''''•''' ''''' . 11 ,II , I t !Iiii ft** Opus Northwest Lit WI I /,-'4- . . I :1114 Varorailcoder Rad =if Ms I Mg :4•''''' „‘,, dal. i 1 P`, A_FIBL-1 CIVIL•STUCTURAL ENGINEERS•RPLANNERS Ow Northwest LLO 1,1 •,.....mwr.v.,,rtmr:-..=,..—. 420411.4100 — . too•1m A......111.I .WA MM.WA 08004 WOW U I . ....:;;.•:;i.•'••;- IrR li r f�_. :.;t.,. N. • FIN .. :...-................ • Gq.., :GM ''1114op.. .. • • ..,,.. -.-.-....- _..-..:.::_. -...._., .: _.s.........,___.-..tom- .... .... f.:.,.,:r» _._.__...-:.:_...:. Ir.Y.l� • rt:: 0 , . t4.1 .,. :...._._r...-_.. -:,. .ilk.._- .-.......... ...L.._. ,,.., I � ? _ ` dr.,"+..-5.:.. , ....,,- ..' :...yam -'.::, � SIB Irk, `:1,;:'� :�„ ',tl9Js„, -ar5s.x,,.,.-N, t \'N\ `m5 erpry @1:•��'.[v 7,1 ,?, ,. {� V".\,'',-1:F4un.uk,i, _ r G I'I‘': O .... 1 • ., >I.. .,."1 l:t. Y---` ,i".l?k•':,,i,,," �: 1 j g•��� 1 �_'$'M y� {,.... „...._,.:s.,,,...r'F 1'm,a,. - li a ` i'. L:.- : . /• I1,i`.,n tr, „ -- „wr \` ^ ' ` 1::. <. ' '� . �fi��,1 1E y( r i :... ; t oaf,. \ ) ��_ ��._~ �._ � Z I N p � 0 1.t,ii , ` fi, Sri.i!\ _ , 4 � .,—.1 + ' Ili � F — ` , + V rI' .I t : f . „ �� , g i /, `_'�" <'xl - . _ .i?'.;:-..41,tat. p;{,t � `r • °h =tea•, I`k7 '.r' • , '.,is f� .,'. did. N di,; •S. a ?,r.*_Cj4Y '(, `i ,.?:,: f+; 'V ,' r, �`S',.>:.,tr,Y}-,:i°r-Yrk: �'ir''r :'1 ''''''.›..:..1.-1.-- 2 - 4,1 „::::::— .t,,, ,:..?“:,-,-,.„A „.0 • ,.. , . s, ..,. .. .... .., r ,..„,„:,,,,,,,.„:„:„.1, .,. . . ,,,,.:::.......,i,,,,,,.-. ,....,,4.. '.11911111 : '' ' ' .."' • '1'1 •''''• i . • �r r „ *` i ' '� "'r " y Y �� ' ce- A j'` ; ,.7sI ` -J 4:'>r.z:. 'ma .. ._ - ,.ihii'i ;'l'�,.•5. .._. ':-._ •- ��_-' III 'y. , . ,t. • yr;. At ." v��` :16c [ : iiggt "'"°° Opus Northwest LLC Upper Master Rosd g itl1��� .4 AHBL, . i pa. 11j6 Mims� P9A$�� ^ �' CIViL .STRUCTURAL 5 oft* QprN0 1LLO In,l ENQINEERS•PLANNERS p 5 too.xu t vnr ME aee fM ern...WA UM a1A{uao ,,.,P.i'�*vow.wn tTA •.aruI • MnlW " -1y• <K cil !t IIxK.:DOOR OOlP PJK� 6 W 9klY ON. iY\\ti Twrx = _ FZ / m'R TP. ITITIIITI - n ,B - M RN M ME Mffl .6 X Fifl n �PROPOSEO — 41W 1 ------ T .W. -S 1LL0117I-1 sLsv A'r 1 O I O 1 g 8i ■in■ I 4 -"g-DO Mi n4 IIIIi at I wssT sLs1/,aT 10144 O 2 N I 1 1 1 I , -al N prnmoondon.ffinffir Bi--- irri h-11- i ..... b061T1.4 sLSYP4T I01V O tm• • II 21 101; ___ _ hr, 171 N ---.Fi___________ ___ t 0 r B 1M 46.1ler sLSY.41"ICoN1 O NW • P-P F i! I wr. v Oil NDO CMOs* OsloIS Z7 OOT A ar W,Stara Iasi Ma A3 91 Ia.. (;) Q Q Q T nm'-m• Q Q Pi ,oIC?11..1 Jy <C 9m'-m• 9m'-0' 9m'-m' 9Bb• 99'-m• 9m'-0' 50,r 9m'-m• 9m'-m' j I I fi I lt CO UJ I I I I I I I I Mc,.a j I 'APO I I l a i$TOF,.9� ��a WORT Jj la_ _ _ _ _ _ 2a 4 I j j I I I I 'JJ' . Sij I I I I I I j I j I I I I I t. I I I j I I I I I I I I j I I I I I I j I j I I I I I I I I j I I I I I ag I I I I I I I 2 � i j I j I I I I lu " ` I I I g �" mil i:IL : : : 1 : :: ":: II IIIII IIII 9-1•5 a 1- 1 — o ® rev,9m. t jI li j j j 9,9-e, AV,' I 1 =li:1 i jI IIj Of 9m'm• WORT OFFICE un-ocz . , I kb a Off,! ,�L4V - _-1 3e-2Ne• 1 V ' ' T J,}I}CO4ERED SiJRAGE I I^( 1 ` /- __NE\ T�--N va- �•`� -- --=',.._, , J VI• / ' ;,/' 11a ,; —II_y "r \ __ ee�sv'e. O;A ` � '�'YIIIifg':; d ' <z 09L �1 11 (� /. a-'- M.Zro�S005 ��`//;� -_ p ��.����,w,�. �O z 1 z y I-Z a v 1 3 }a' 500L01.01 �I I `o� iY ® Q1�Y •y � ' 0; `_q 1,-!' o�[P PROJECT INFORMATION / rt r %���f_ P (g���.�a1 _ �- �A i, - ZONING./BINDING TYPE. y a ""vAll '"e(�RFew- -4 �� ZONING= M(MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL) ( '� P Of � j° /I \^ - BUILDING TYPE=3N ;/,'�,A f -o.a-�� �I �/_� 'g 07. P n = --at' ZONING.AGENCY /` 8 �t�_` 1 ^ Yyl'k„ CITY OF RENTON-PLANNING DIVISION /' `:C���/ / •• BR U ! � \ '' '^ 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH '. y/ ' _ u ` .!,m ( Z„! RENTON.WA 98055 ��� i.y ��//' I/ 1� � T 206/235-2500 // �I �{ l '(I ' s J CD'L SETBACKS,. %"j'-e,:, //; 0i/- 4T�.�' °feRK trNE o :'_s c:�EO'�w,:, .. .,0 ,.'{~..., II \m 0 14.1_z i CURRENT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS SUBJECT TO SITE PUN RENEW. CURRENT _�� SETBACKS MAY DIFFER FROM THOSE IN EFFECT DURING DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION // / T3'L' r'- ii. -i-e'/ i - I N OF EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS '>y. / 1 » a tMuB, 1I11" ', �n _ 4 I - PRONDED: FRONT=20', SIDE=60'MIN., REAR=140' EIAVA iy _ ¢ss�ngl� '4• ..W D6AM / 0 F OOD ZONE. %i e��9 ^I' c`=`y` '_ :._ ,• ''��/ OF R TOP O .p x, THIS SITE APPEARS ON NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP.DATED MAY �' / 1 4 �I 1 --'-moMil o -'-i+•,, _ - 16L INNS.COMMUNITY PANEL ND.53033C0976G,AND IS SITUATED IN ZONE ..(:/ •�pl'� 1•,.\ 'N - O / p• �, 'I( AREA DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 500 YEAR FL00D PLAIN AND ZONE 11 A /(f/ % i 1 - e /� �.a_ \ \ "e\ O�\- _y/ /, / AH ROOD DEPTHS OF 1 TO 3 FEET(USUALLY AREAS OF PON0ING)BASE I C a' L "1 _ ROOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED(19'). I \\ /hh1 IA\ \ \ �. fi -�'-. 11 SUBSTRUCTURES. I� I o / / 'ii(11 iR i 11, • C� /"�._ \ .y \ `_�- ,_N/HINQIff. / / /// �_I 11 S.!' BURIED UTILITIES ARE SHOWN AS INDICATED ON RECORDS MAPS FURNISHED 1191 A' i 190` \ / '^ 11 BY OTHERS AND VERIFIED WHERE POSSIBLE BY FEATURES LOCATED IN THE l�/ i1N,r �' /_ \ a Llti 6 ° �¢ .1�, o FIELD WE ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THOSE RECORDS / \'� _ `6 'k _� FOR THE FlNAI.LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IN AREAS CRITICAL TO �I lull'� /,./ 'P,1,7 f�'.}T�i.'/ cyr �` 'Q `, / �� // DESIGN CONTACT THE UTIUrY OWNER/AGENCY i(1 I.41, ` I e e\ \ �_ ,-NDDft5E1£F9.w_Nl J�9.99r c�y� % -/ / r- i SITF/PIIII DING SQUARE POMACE. //r it 1(irll�(1t ut1411�1 �'^6 �,T "\\ \� `-��� �r ) I(n aly .. TOTAL SITE SOUARE FOOTAGE=309,997 SO/FT ().12 ACRES) /I�' 11�`1 @I y ` )�•, _ \'r 'V \ N_ Esa'FF._]20c -�� c`'� {w I_I aaaaaa(; BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE / pi I I I �,•, 9 - � /'% (Y;„ 1'1 III 1,I IDS• ��'�� __-_ `1`\'110•` \\ _ , PRODUCTION SQUARE FOOTAGE=29,965 SOFT ��//��(! 11/l/�I' I `t y��;'i< �'TI_` - ', / -_ i // __ ' _ ;, `',0'r BEGS WAREHOUSE SQUARE FOOTAGE=66,103 SQ/FT '4 1 /1I WW`- in \• \ ,` / /// 1a P- "9w l OFFICE SQUARE FOOTAGE= 5,000 SOFT IIIIII IIIII YM�� iii `\\I•t -�40 \ / `' -� lel� F-1 R �<' TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE 101,060 SO FT �I��\\\ L,-_y \ \-� Ic_{ _ -` 1- (4. -- BUILDING FOOTPRINT SQUARE FOOTAGE=101,068 SO/FT I C (\', i �i�f 1 - Li- I1( {{�) li \\I\\1C4y \ j'� P=a29nao 1f1�' Y^� �`'. <44 .:F'. SITF/RUI DING I OT COVERAGE PERCENTAGE / A ttiktit • ki I R .�8 I aI BUILDING =43%(101.068 SO/FT) // lIl I ,��._ _ \ `�� ! 1 %, ImNs 6/23/99 PARKING/LOAD NG=5)E((136.316 SO/FT) P^ �W y�%/ • - \;- — .r L 8§53% 4 TOTAL=))R(23),384 SO/FT TOTAL IMPERNWS SURFACE) I I 'l�N'y�L ,}�A' /�,�_ \ t \' voo NUA\ r/ `I F'•Y w DIVOTS w PARKING' NI./,�� ',SIT, \'4t� \'va , � xl�rm J J I I �F- � e PftODULTION/WAREHWSE YAWING SPACES REQUIRED 1 PER 1,500 SO/FT)=64 pe--/\>�� ��'�N��/'� ��\�� , " -: � ww=ma.�OFFICE PARKING SPACES REOU RED(3 0.5 PER 1,000 SOFT) _IS-23 / ��/'�� N � A ,S' ',: `� _`�'"S �J� I /VStAmp i. TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED=)9-8)' / r-"'-ii---_ 44/ J •.,- '`-.Q.',;,..,N ' \ � ',taN�c 1 rHANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES REQUIRED =4 )I / II � \ ,..., �/ \' 1 `\ "aej •1,/1/\C"COMPACT(8.5'r16')PARKING SPACES PROVIDED = 3 ill iiii } ✓' !! ii 3'` • , I 'a4Ir STANDARD(9.420')PARKING SPACES PROVIDED =100 �l 1 ///%% " .y iA\ 4"\ �•' G `.s ' " � ao _ ii HANDICAPPED(9120')PARKING SPACES PRONGED= 5(ALL VAN ACCESSIBLE) �„ 1 � -�,,\�,',._y- \ • ':'bO,,'.\�`vv' �Y_ � I /�, TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED=108 II ll II I� \. y-�-\\ v•'1 ; �•' / ' / PARKING I OT LANDSCAPING.(PARKING SPACES/SM. I•I I ilk. - -''/ -�; _,,, T�\\ •�� '� - `\`: • - v, A, #0��r _ /\LANDSCAPING REWIRED(19.308•.05)=965 SOFT i1l 111I/III'I'il:(}ri � \�,, "--'-:-j�--�1 e'��'\,\=•a �*p pp�� .�� �II �/ JY LANDSCAPING PROVIDED=3,900 SO/FT 1 I 11i1111 Ilk / 'tl�'' . / \,\\ 'N \-118 Saf.. P�G/. Ili'II II11�tI0 Q O �;\ • , Va 441 '�./� 'III' i \,.. a 111111I' I Illil',��, \\ i '' n rr eEu:r' .4rlGrq\ � •s o i hill ,, '`\3'\.I 1,6 _,e,': N ,1 ( f,)., Q N. \ ,,F /TOJ6,wD = di; I��1,II�;I� 1�\ r i91`a �,, -` •amn o �I1 1 I\,1``1\ 1 mil\ ~' r r 9+®t f '. l�✓,r](111 1 i�`'/i Y irllo1.mn �`IlU REPAR f4c \\ "� /1 .�\. L_''4' 9a ,/^ ' 'Z �m e i('I!/��i,I '-`Ill n_• - �\ *i? •:��`I I I fie; ,if, ;/lI/°,� W W ;illIlll/ll/I )I A till 44 - \O/ 'f I I 'q i 731 I�rx O 1A1/ih111 1 ;' \i ,, (jil�jil1(((1 �i) ,I i IL. _ I _ METRO \"`�. IIllll���, i]I i� - - A,ry J II - - I'\\;,\I\1�\ \--K. _ \\ /\� : :4 CerMt App..=WA-97_I64 u u '\',\Tt`,i` \� I 'ru/'_,i\ - Neal r65-Upper Ste \�\ \ ,u\ ,,,YYY::: tmab I-WaaEe uqm Scele •..0' ss d AEB OM= O\ / 00 p6N 9)29�'9 e���lti i�l J \ ate, / - ?'/,,'' " - J� ),;�O �, O ; y �, 66..1 N ,t ,_ , '-;.1 `'`f 51-rm 1=L9a�i , r/ _ Al ... rt, .1.,es6e,.nw i.r..450isi,• 'I'''''''' *. iiilii. • -1— '• ,• ,...t.„0. i . i 1 1 'I - 1_._._._._ ,,,,,, . ._._._._._ , " ;'.. 1 COURt 1--- . i..& 1 - /•-------..----•—•—— •,,, ‘,.. 35 * 414•441........:C7-• 1 ••• \ ,..,•„„‘ .7., 1i ' 4,60./0 I • I '.-' t Ak a I '--4:491; `•••-•.P.,(-45*,-------:-Z-- /0 . 1 9 0 ... --''''''',47,-.44,, .. . .--•••-•-----•--- , 17 • ... ICC* . I±1 ww1,1 _ 19 -, ''S--c•i 'i,. .1','7, • ://y/ ''•-•' 1\ ..0 • ao 41 42 " - . ‘•.‘ \ Re..."--- 1"".'."...s."4...*No`.: 34 — , - . •-••"::.I ,,,,et '• 44,- .."' "•••• 15 -__-4 „. • / -qr ---„-,,--,—„. ,,----1 • •43,11Lot3 P111111-11111111 . 19 1,,,b ••• , , p126 Acres ,,,. --r•%"` I GRAPHIC SCALE .'' .„... i -I - --/ '- - T . ••••° 28 B . 'I'. 13 -"- k.! ' "...' '1'4 , P.,11$ ' '',;%•'' I /,'../\% .1' • \ .......-•-\ • 25B , • , " s ' '; 21 •c- ,-,.____ , . ,,, • •, '1)40. r•z- . ''''''" ' '-a• ,i e-7 b ,,,• p.ot • \ % , . ...._. "sa.„ _ , 2 ' • ,, "" I . . ... • -.am ItiRtwil ,. -- ' .4, \ _....,, 4., i, • 70-.‘ --,,,N,,,,:flrogrza,r7 - --,,r.• ,_, Imizti ,,--.--1-74,::.-,- . , .-._,,,,,,e,,,,, ,..••• ,:_.__::— , .il , .... - cERTER , A S H 1 ii--..q T llo\to'IT E C H • • . .- .044°'\ ' ••. / ...----.. \ COIL \,',,„ k.' . . • 1 $'tel.:. 7,11 Mir:77 . ;:, ' Gsvl Lot 1 4 e •• - s •., 1170 Acres i , '• \ . - TE....CAL :fIll, II . • \ ii ovl Ixt 2"',•'•,„\ 11.-------*;-"•,;"=.."" I ) ) ss, ' .....'- .-"--•---•--. ''L-• ------.4 .. , ,,,....."' GC 47 Acres 13/4.1,_'•••,,,,,.„„ _____,--" \ ...J-7------71, : 1 il"'" - Ilr.-,% t:‘1111ipilr!!!,: ., . .,,,, , . I ti // \., •„, '." I LI.::k:',-,----------,-----1 ' . °0>. • I2 M . _.,,.:',",1 s • , , . . '--- 1 1 c\--\' • .- --- , W A- S 1 N G I / ,P. 1?"'=71-"z.."' -.- Metro Wa-iwrtocks_r ..,,c,j_ imi,..._ _........* - , 1 M%, .)". / .... 12 0 s,....; -•••. •i , r \ — ••: ' ..- —,,,• \., '''..A.- \ .,_ ....- I LIM a - , -• . -:::•,?:.jr1r-4:-..-..:t:.,: _. _ ,, _ • • , ,, .,1 „-::„ ,1:5 I ,„,---%.„-. La.,izi, _Pito ,, ( • , ri, .. , .,,. \ F 0 R T. ,, e:.- I• IIII \\ ' - • 16 N i„ .•-, .. s , . \ ., _ I •••09*.ki Ips. I I Pe.20,41AL2 \.‘,......:\ 1__TECHN 1) .. .. i_ .. .,_ ,......-- .....----- , ----1 _-..---- N, I.\ i 1 .1 I - 1 ' i --- \ %III f c - , • ,• ?.i' ..., i ,w1 •.•-;. j ___.. _- .,. ----'1 :. - L.,.,.1 \::•,, ,f...m Z ) g• "%-;:". ‘, ‘"".., , % ,•:. „mid 6 i‘ •",..„,,,,,, • ',Q. 1. ,,...,2:"--:-.,,„---------:, \ 7•:.°e•-- ElOw. Acres „„•§ \ ,04. N, ',„ i i %, ix 0 ,, '",., -- ,„---- . - c.• ':i, .,..- 2 ,,,q ,,. ;,. DEPt -1- HI . s•.:;„ S,)., I —1 a=0 'ill• - •zz. 1 2 -23 ,, i•NO\ TO,L 73..d uza•1 ....\‘•-.---,-;:- \'-'" f,•.,,i,,,,,,,,,, \ , 1 ,, I 1 a t‘_•:, . 21 .:ro tit,' "<':,,, '-^-,\ i . ,, •:. , ‘ , ,_-- .=-2-,... i. '''''' " ;;'&•\1'4,,,, ',.........., _ -,- . la:`.1i I . .ts 1 ,• . , -.... \ „,.., -.:; • I .. k...,.= . $. /.sisr S7k. 24 t "A .' cilightfilir, \ '4°'" ' --, c -„11W ---'- ' Vt-t, "D' ..., -, o ;; ,..-o.,i. .-- '*--. '•,:.; 4., ..0-•'"..* ., o , 1=4o,•1 /-.,.. • -- % '. =.. • 0.04 zti 0 , .' ".',, ,'"f'...',c.. ".• . , ' 6, --, e #(..; ,J..,- ‘ .-cfl l :, *....„.....10,0 - ... . .0,\. . g,. , ..„0 , ----,;Y(-:',?,. .1 , .. . ._ l.Dit l'-'.. ,....--:, "- ., -_„. , .f$'' -" .' NO "I ..., / —41/ INT.ERST, ..... 19 -...„ )..P.' • -" tl - . / 9. --------7 „.., 1 ("15 X:-23At ' .1--'".4 '••• •--V'f,'0.1 ,..4 7Z?8 1.41 DK '' 172 •-':5•'"". '' -- - /::'...--;. ..•1, • ..1r..: MP % — E. 4; .• f".10 ; c.,CI C:::]„01.3j simri --..p-A„,. - ,..,,,r, c/LI • ,„,., 4.61-v..'—g: 1-11 :1 '4, , '-^Q:QC3 • .2aamck Em ..,..!... ".--••••••, !:, s,- " '1' e, ..........,,-,--",•2 •'" _, ''.--- i• R'D'ill ....AL- ,-:, IN- .,.,-;N a* -----. ''`D .,7-/-----\\( ."" A /ill ..----- \-•;",41:<:-- . , , s 157-`01 7 ';•'-',.., a.6 I - s ,. Tukwila Park •--1 . L . ,•'-'.\N__I •-•' — . - •Oair°'• ':'•{7 --41 27 • • - . . . a" D"G E r•I• Li:4 ••1: if.s.ka.- LD' 7......",,sw iii -...>._ ,...t. ., ').7..,...r.„.\\e., T--_...0...‘:„.c.......; ,,,,:.....cms . : - —.., 'i,••11,0 ssts7 --„ , -'..: '-"o A1111111, 3 •'1.-•: 0 , ./ ''S- -.:Los "'",>. 6 C° 1 -•*°"'97.93.ta w. ir •.".12.. • . ,0 I I , ,,' ,,,_. ' ''.•°• II; li; 15 I "'• IM'.<-.-- --''''': El. .- , i , . ..... .„... , .„..... ,,..,, . ...... .„_..... ....„,,,,- . ---,..\\ , , , „ ., ... , ...., T,,„:„TE ........„ _ ..„ _ „ , . , , : ,,,,,... ...„„ . ___,.. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 33 so Fi4° 3 zi a m F .iii , o 7 3'1 2 �4 • gALl g i " ?" ' g 'g g M §.A g 0 a ir E,g . gof °@Er 0 4 „`6 nouu - 2 A.: § ;5.0m' gN9�§i 4 5l'' ' gli .. i. to pn w ' 4 8: o =zcB° �o8'a ig o .5.g 8•g q`o A.g a as 7ek11 rpj%. p ., -,°o H �o S ' 3� A =wa 2 4c and v g. g 9 S €0 9 ,lbg g=§ -- RAC _ K rE EiA . .e ll 8a m ) 2 8 � `a 4. a I �dm � zsg g • a3 ig - , �`x .� • �1N •,.;.'_;,;,; ..:fi' >;-�T£.2...:?,,e U ..mot ,s'• :. _;f'},,"._)�I,�,,, �'� y .:' � ``�;1.. .,i -�'�.ti.rr. ,\�\� •t., •ti.-,\: ^s .. i iS,g; �`'-ty,-,..:4: ,s.. .,i:,. ...� - `'>,x}�, i` . 7.:- % • ^; ,k: vl, . 1\ '4'.,.- 0 ....0 I Ate;";.' �,_..:'.,...: f!' ''Iv ��'s.,:•..§t,;�""ft�.'_'`�`�Lti"�".���-„`'i,.':�'-�' �' \\`; ' .:i ;v - ,r a "1 \•f�. { 4\'<, f, y - 'f; S>}r.•k:-�ti•-�,:,..;,`.,',�',`ts•+:;s: ''',.''\,.;:.. �' :.y„'c't T'dy". ''•I `f5• 1'�:"" .� 1-yG}:;�.;i� ` .:. 4aS �,,v IJ :.VI ,.t.,; �,' ''9uYTrn-;;�''•+sate ...f,..•r.Y,,,� ;,; •.'\., G:•' .4v l 4f.a:> ::�',."r�S.^.r:. e•'! . .'fit, i >.,^V„:iir;"s� ,.r.ctl.,.iu' '"14:i"';u`;5�'•s`h'G �\,' t� I �I•• :::?..:4:00::,,‘i. 4•As.,:.. , i�:.-..,..,4"„y,i '�^',:„n, ,srq�,•:rz,s� '� ': `.'•, gin: 1 .A >JI„f��#;.,,.�;#.:;up,C4:.•8'1,•�i- ,. 'i:,•L".cr,,_I>.,,.4 r'i-_> '';�', :•i:r�h�1 : ..t}"r ; •rS�.` .''• r ;'i>ls�••�"i µ,^ .i>i,A1,,,z::tA"''`;� �?"'•14' • :.'�'.'t, ' Y ,, �yrrr,,,aa��.. ,:.. ,`.ii '" ,„ NiC•FfY CL. 4 't s • ,i\:'„M1_.' - vl5_ ,,,` ' '. .,,, - \ o,t',:5:ti at. ,;:r j,,... AI',:tir4>' .''4'^,_�'t'^r F ;\�\•• '.,fi' --'3`::'`L.... '',' i .;, 2P / "%. ; \ tq, 1,. I I, ! , - , �f I ; i ' ''' - " ;r : \ • :• fit:..'' 'A I,,,,,,,,,,-,co �1,, ter ,!� y {ty/., ;;'1 y', �_1`:>r tj: vc3°a6 "��¢j "'n.'``�`ty,:. iif . ''' • r ty arSr �� ,�;a' I. ii /6 , ` 7 . Y � i' i : • ! \ .'•'- `g i` 'i. 'rf 1. ''�yf a• t �i`, Y,t''r ,' iI ly; ./.^ /":z':gij,y'*�,a,:N5::�4"; :1'u:,e � `$: it a/'eyO :::;7,4'▪ ', =-,•^,.,e.;.{{ •i', ,4§,., :tr'�'?,"J;,r,.,;,Ars:; a•' 1i 1 ` '. t 'tiF';�141..4i:: \."g r:1.y, ,'rxr�'r�xfl`.;.rss.; ,>,Y;'�`iS;F =.'��*`� `�� z tea+' i li ,•y,.,�Sr'..'�.,M1.. I. =44::..:�p:;=trg:;av?,�.;.,.y,,,�s �'v,+£.L F. Fy.'fir: I ,,�,,.•{i'` - 1 ,�etti,,. ,'>:'it ;>V-tn,<>i>Lt; ',\ `%n'"i{,:�.y;'yAM-. r-,..ra„-:< .s' -- µ ..,' ,�'.«' _fir- S*-:: ,� ,4'.._ ..,35 .'%:'?i,•:,:u„ F •1 lie _ t�.Y.:`i:asr»<;€.,.,,;`•'>, ♦ %fS-r,'�.'w:, -z..£is"hif`}2i�?5!'•:'YI-n d� ;W;I. .y..P�r,YT.,,r,,, - - '.-*,S;>_.,:^r, d'Nx':.v`['?•=nr:' r_axr;.,.,: 5 ...5\ ( r'\ .r'8`+�="•Gi^.i=b._s:;r''.r:. .r.;, • \♦ yr �;,4 :'�: ;tSsM1YYr,„U?u ,-_ :r.t, A•.'8 •:, `1 �,-,,,rie;,,„ram. �� ',t.. ♦ - 'a''• ,43%r�+ ,>SAf,h�e' • k ,m. ;:'.�.,.•,:X;;.�`":%c;9i'1%�;'v�: l `:1 < ,`:w_. �,n;t dr_,\,_lr,,. .lr: t'n',,i.,, l'' \ •ai:r�s`s..1,.;tM;4rR7 ..hr:...: {'. ♦ i� a5;i - :.']"4_.- ..JfS'n5.'::': '� ':f�':..,`([el�.' e>,,.^H::554...> ,1 y!.' l"rune r.L,.� >Ir':.': '_<r<,.: ., \. >�J.'}F:<>,,ry -•s'�",I,-.l.l R' is ' • • "",1:ate' r>+!i"i"':" if ?Ork'''3' ."$ ix"\ :V: .$� 7.V7 • • �l. \ rtr•: -..,4' -::a'v �' - ';.. ':i. "'„ -;' :e irks' \` :, e Sri,;.... '�, G „..-„,?,;,,,7„, ,, , , . ...,..: , .„„;,,..„.:„.,.....„,,,„,,,r,..„..........„.........„,„ ....„-7,,,„, ..... , . ,...,.. ., ,% .3\ .. • -.:..:' : „';A: 1 , - AHBL 4 : !�p �"° Opus Northwest LLC �ali � ®5 ! lapw IleMwr 1 �R e,-, 4N._,� •• i 11$b t11,11,,, j•°gyp°e� J. AIt " CIVIL a STRUCTURAL ;5 °`~ OpaaNa aatLLO 1.4ENOINEERSaPLANNERS Ba S f00.MM Awr 1I, orb tot.bb...WA 00001 420.034190 w=Pa; ,. fit., -.., 2-1,,j ---......„,...s. AV1'I- 1 t,, W: �11�,1�1.11. '�.,4 `,\ :, 1 1;.° •'\=,,:\+ _'' G R — ' %.ad . LDWPRoelf,®.A� • -1-'r 0-7 `\ s fS, y r -f S 1III- , :1 u HD--;- ;0 ZI set °F woes `! i_ I`9= Ptdi pwp. ours MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN S JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORP Raymond Nielson 821 2nd Ave 1 , PO Box 479 7000 SW Grady Way Seattle,WA 98104 Renton, WA 98057 I ,WA Ij I 242304 9004 08 I 242304 9008 04 � , 242304 9027 01 KING COUNTY , I CITY OF RENTON Metro 500 K C Admin Bldg I ! 200 Mill Ave S 821 2nd Ave#M 122 Seattle.WA 98104 I Renton, WA 98055 i Seattle, WA 98104 � I 242304 9030 06 ! 242304 9112 07 242304 9114 05 `— 1vUNICIPALITY OF METRO SEATT ELAND BUILDING LTD PRTNRSHP I ' B&G Renton Prtnrshp 1100 Monster Rd SW I PO Box 80187 I 146 N Canal St#310 Renton. WA 98055 1 Seattle, WA 98108 I Seattle, WA 98103 I I I I 242304 9117 02 Ili 242304 9120 07 242304 9121 06 RENTON FISH&GAME CLUB INC RENTON FISH&GAME CLUB INC ;7 RENTON FISH&GAME CLUB INC , 17500 SE 144th St 17500 SE 144th St 17500 SE 144th St Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton,WA 98059 II I 242305 9002 09 Jj � 242305 9002 09 242305 9002 09 RENTON FISH&GAME CLUB INC I Metro FLY AWAY INC 17500 SE 144th St 821 2nd Ave I 7421 S 180th St Renton. WA 98059 1 Seattle, WA 98104 Kent, WA 98032 II 242305 9002 09 242304 9006 06 000020 0001 05 BLUME GARRISON PARTNERSHIP Seattle Municipality-Metro l Metro 2825 E Lake Ave E#310 821 2nd Ave 821 2nd Ave Seattle, WA 98102 II I Seattle, WA 98104 Seattle, WA 98104 I ! 242304 9123 04 1 242304 9078 09 I . 242304 9097 06 KING COUNTY I 821 2nd Ave I Seattle. WA 98104 I I 242304 9081 04 I 1 11' I 1 I . 1 , I j P 1 1 1I I , I11 1 ! i I I I I l' • im i• N 1 FE i. Z (I) c I IIPP 1 M y: / ° • m " - m i or om I ar L I • m r I ,' 1 m m m I> 1 - I> 1m Ai BoaI° A I i11° °1 IIIIIIa ° 0 I I 0 A Z 0 I ZZ 0 I - L 1 IIIIIIIIII . j J IIIII'w\ I0 1 '7I ° w ° I - o � - gr VA I ii �WI F R I I 1 °- ix I .IIIIIIIIII I I illlllll .1111III ° ,lllllll .III 1 O 1 1113 lilt,il .11111 O n . A I —'t 1 ° I I I I a 8 I;7 it a a g 1 1 :r _ w i R v : , gg g Opus Northwest LLC AIIBL Rw ° Cascade Alrpes - 54 3; e W OpusBuil n Ehwstlons LLC A CIVIL & STRUCTURAL Opu�Narthwut,LLC ENGINEERS•PLANNERS 5 S CI000-112111 Avenue NE. SOW 20E, Bellevue.WA 08004 425 e0E 4100 Q T I, I 11 w - - - -1- - - --- 0 1 - i. 11 I. 50 i 5JG 1 90© 1 03,O 33 r i 1 Q 4 0 . I I • A - - - - - - - - - - - - - _L —i-- - - - - € mint j i r 1 13,0 j j I I> j z , a - - - - - - i - - - - - - -.- - - — - - - - - 1 t. "' P j [ ;1- •' 1 rsu' 1 I r •-F_-% -- Z 1 I I A-T 1— - - T t � -0- - — 0 I j 1 11 1a _ i .j i i i i i � 4 i j i ' E i I I E I I I j ' °o ' i I I i I I I E i I j 1 M0 161 1 i m 1 i 1 I , I i i j i j 1 i j T $g j i m0 I ti 1 Fi I - - - - - - 0 r o- ,, Opus Northwest LLC A AHBL is ° Cascade Alrgee A . ae ;N Floor Plan e cn.m: Opus Northwoet,LLC A CIVIL . STRUCTURAL - „�...�..R s.u.zo .��..�.w. a . 425.5.,a ENGINEERS�PLANNERS .:i. iao ,� a 5. e 3 0o a o Rmiaun MI. Dale I 0 i it r.-m• u 7—,_—___-___-- —__01 4 ihh �i 0 -hall P i Iii Pil i i i i 1i 11 V i i I i ^rl .1. -----® O H x 55 =s t e m{ M Opus HBL Northwest LLC Uvrjairster Rood ouim va CIVIL• STRUCTURAL cw »o-UMAvowNI Ike.WC w..M,WA wow MOMao ENGINEERS�PLANNERS SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 N. , RANGE 4 E. W.M. <;' E _ RENTON, WASHINGTON /'Y� D• it _it E 5703,.5093 - _�II/ s1.-I lI I "•'E'D Si...:4E t /�j / ENE 'r N88'35'03•E Ixc Y j'-��UB. .�J IAi SET STAINLESS _ - 0r ¢ , ;, 3 cJ /' 1 . \34 - - _ ':,af ,1^ 9s, S1EEEL NAIL ---_ `L0v I.. {p /ia 1'I�i''O „- l- l ,,,/ 4r7- __._:r�b F 1 IjL '4,_,...,,rC_ z ^ ' o aio I4r 1 r!/' —y ti _ 4I , x W,= /0 1 sicv.cE Lcr y,,+ r - tL''i'��, FJ� ��,, t f Q -3= +! _',i n i.,. 'tYtH.a .71'. 'pgg�3' !, 4 ! { w ,,, -?;. ". ..,, n ;, �z-: • -- `" /�'•/' St /"— � 'r^� � �r'° ��`��,`t Ki � ° °s a 1..k� .._ •crr�Y""-� 4�c�"� o�m ,.2 :�. ° s—x ��� l e- S'6M ......x. 7�wl..54# - r 1 ., a lam 2 I '' � � i •9axvstv^'�';.�3]•C;hY�tt�. ".nk;^ ''4, :,., -;: s: ,... .;,..e, u.t .i/= u,., :' _ / a ,� ^^•".. nn .�i +p Y �1' yam - ;� -INz9'7 o m o 9 fi t o.b / v:C % / % � �_!'.. `.� L?l - y�,-`�:dAakv-51 .k li , �v�'.$'T,`•'••, >�- •/I I _ °I`, ° CIF- TOP erR-zzsa R.365.32' v 9`+ o° /y n''� �/ ��- .t" t vL9?. lyH S.SerrxS,I,P<t.?:« � F:f 1"////Q: "r3,�_. 60y z c'�: �� r•-!i e-1,'t. >i^.+' r?n: r' .:.,L.Y.ii`y.,'f<5'.,t+" u - .I att°r Rw1fN1 0 - T=871.06' 0 p`� - a° 7, ,}/• / r 0 J..t. yp• !A ,.,,...., 4--�l' ti. ',,- 3 „4 p , - n s , J PRO,ECi P - � '/,/.."/ �Y �� /• y �''''.�,�y ,:" t3..• t.,: � +�T _ N 75,51.1 3 ��4 f ./74-:"'"---, —sA '.:>:.44,, + r,, Y'£'t�'^.'� 3n ::..t :.'•'yf�;'.680 _r_ V _ . / /.::<% A� e :�r^,'� o'. *If'''. •y, :1:: -f.-3'r,irr.114::4i3:47a'i::•-' aco E 50760.397{ /. • / / / �� �,•��'A.:•.i'' ?.[..D••: \ ... . ..... ....... SET TACK/lD EHIN Z, �/ �' ► -ROW C.,6 .. z`:,?"4"...,. i , m e / dal msy',``� -am �r � ,,0/ ' F''4,, sca s y, i . /zZlr,..„./ ,off%. >` , RY c'jf..< ',.'•'; __ ..�, °aroam mf n.sr, ta_ .. i,.p���IJ��� � �- �I rs. -� N_. i .- 3e. 1 �' .L ._ ,+•_-.r ^'•,• Ilr[i; si -nw: (»y; :„`.`::saO 4-- � 'O�'a' t 'IJ-1•JI'" - •b� __ =�1�,�/ ./'� \ IIsT1:I I I I:9,\ i 4„ . ,• y` - �- N I !.(,1 V .. -- _ L , %j// %j%i?.,�' 7 , ,_+.),,II ti'l ,fI l..s..,r >4'j t._ '-._a/ -Q l ' _ ,�' ///// // 1 rooi w."d.t.. x *r. ems,. \ K. '/ / • /,(/j7 � )), II I ,,/ ';�/,�,�',''��x- -'�?t' �rY,_'�� \a �� �l '.K�-I' e.erys i// /�%I�j�`''� I ��xf'ri•i. s:.'c= i.:. '.,,.,.,4I- —�a -° ' f///�Ii° Iu ffr:(i;: 'L `'3#` .rT ./A ���� rI ll-I� ,, '" //'f7 i// il•' '1\;•;11 '1'71'fir F>w-.'-'',1--.: \* I: 4r • / - J I1`1. w +'> •-w4��'..'`Y 660 '— j\i �b •op . _I:�9.7'. •i/, '6 '''" i'r5 I�� 11�1. �6._ a 1•T:- 4 ,`� `�F` % �� sA,i j/ ,� _ /i�i�it �: II // .'iil�,/ $�° :i \, t,. / F /// .// ,t11 d x I'�+/j x. ��e:i.,eta: -=•.'.a.O 2.- - - Tt:_ ' --� me• ' 1 _ _: 1 • I`..a _ t 4. / //�. !1I `'\_ \\:1`\\\ a/;. 91\ \. _-S7:::: T-. n`_ wvt°xml./ / =2POOb� /i ° /%>/••S' �'Q•\ I I �����. I• m su :+, =:'311m1m«•a� "t:*c:''^R b e.mrvr /(H o =756.i6• .�_.p_ //' //// I '"�� /l (�I r=�r'Fd°,.�4Y"tr ego e'�'� .}k,�.,�;.,"S,vty r°a / �'� /r_Cs.xY,•.. . , v:it4i.s, ,,,, 'S'a a ii \ \�1�I �y,fi 1�,'S`.; _- -"i--� ------ _.7171.• ►, 7tA,:;;7,,LI."`k E" 11.01 i / L=89\53,'• ,•.,. E. ,;,1: .;/,� - v , � •,' II I! -•ld'-•- 'i- ��-cv. ,c, '°.•t,'"i° ..�. °� ,� °3' r • V I /Ji - iii �i//h I .li III. ;, ' ,.._ JJ \: 7,D;.. l q ■ m. i'' `�///' /// /' !I it I •Irlr/la/\i ' i,. a°y,'•"•�.ti, "•,#h 9'�{ 7<•'r✓y'•,,•.,ar ",��a��so° s;5 .,. � / •tom (•I /,,,,/. %/ //.jI , 1''r.,l;.11 * � - i 4��\�\\. - rs.fo' , ,{ }fir' J J i// ;�;r:li i ate �� fig,C. '.a.: - i ;�Si g_ ; �.r J 1%,- / /- I i u` I. f_ �� .�-,p '�`, � �.- •�. . � ,4. : '/ n� y., mm0p\.> :��/j/ Ili;li;11" 11Ai;l''�'ilil'I ;'.,'=?�✓=.� by, �• :3 ' s;T ' ':`' ' \ �/ // /%/I,l: I,„ '':'I.i „,„,,,,„:%_�,�ss/_ \1:. s> ±xj.-.. .. .5 4w-•_ _ .•u.„... ■,. oa�a S/' // ! 1'-s''I I iI� IIf(�l ��� \,, V`k?fi n<t �•a, i s.- /•�!',- rc Ns /C%,. ,. .jj/jjjl �I � I�'.''h,''I�'1 !�i�1l l!{1 ,I,'I�L "'v° �,��. / ��\\� �� 'y Yi,� "a".,i` ,tr :t. :'(y\r. NR m a. \\ Ir�� / /. /// 41,1i,4 •\xl\EY1141;,lll:l!II,ltill'i,. •..id"; 'i1;/ :.�,� =\�\\ \�; , t•; ,7'." '�r' 3 «= �\ Sly//tf`'' _ /////,lU I .hy;r. �L'Iglli„ .�. +R � o <s t. \ _ -.,���.,,. :�n eao,�`•::.; ..;��,�.,.4x. �. ,° s r: °} <//i it i!�///jt I I I ,ll;lle 1 111, E ti� / \� \ y " \� \ '- 4 . �. • ,/,,, ,,i/5,i/;, /ii/;a i�i y u11l! I, !Iiilfii !�j; ,,ii\n.,'tt'f:l �':9 �2 �,, \�\\�a;"z�9 yam\\ w`s „' ,0 0 �z ��\�'•,�� \ 4 -/// ////// ��'IIII �# l I I II cI\' ;_' ' \' �o \ �� °. Y Z m i %{" \tea'\ \ �a�bx34 \ m o /_ ,�- //!!�0:l i��'�ti•'Ptl�,!IIII�..4.4 I'� \4 ' r 11 1;0'� eli \\ �'`' r' L)�er' \ <` �•. •° ry �.tl�./, I fi' :!:;,jalli,:111., ` .I ag-, \ s nD.y ;,�-: it q>. !¢. W aC7 0 v. ,\E, ' ,`' '"'llrV'il•.i,',ii,'4,.:1\,-k\;,•G� :61\ -.6, \ �Qvj \'.\ ^ r; ;-r - 0.o 0 .; \�,` \ IIIIIII�rk sLJilljl1111p�1'-'i;i\\\`TC � • li.\`. � a\. `iV.:'. ..,Q.., O •� I„ 0. /! ., f'ilk1/!/�;%,�•'/l'l',I Oil v J,,*\\��� R../ `I`11 74i- '/'� I ��c°7 \ ' 1%.,;{ a<:ylyl, /, ` LEGEND �l ;• Y '-q. /..', m �r�'Il,li II' 11 Ill7/(8' „,,$���'9�x'- a_� FF FINISH BOORI 1' 3 ''\\�\' -`�- 1i411',Ic al.:u 1. 1.1/ ., "^ " s� FC ME DEPARruENT CNECON \ � I / 1.,.,,, 7- .H I '::lY. _ D STORM DRAIN / �`\C'�\\ �� li��'i.,I. ,..__; :.:.. Y 5 SANITARY SERER ▪ i ,\� e �/ v I'�'-"a.l:r '.II:�1 I,II•�' I I•:'}� _� " w = WATER 6" f`� `,t l•_ \">'N \ `'s;' 7 li,' Illl:hl'Illll`I�•,�t W."...t , I R CB - CATCH eASN i y/ '• o,.. .r:.,,or Rr r, \ :: : sM \ \\C:\ I I'�J1 I\'xY,i, \\x`\x\\-\\:'r'.'�r,:\�.i4`,,:>ii, GRAPHIC SCALE • l to,/ \x,," C3 , P ���� <� �/VI///" y4)l\\'s\\: \5'. "\"ia\''tom, .1I\1{', I i/�� 1'.^ �M.:. a•.a, SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 N. , RANGE 4 E. W.M. �w ; _ FFF RENTON, WASHINGTON _ _ Wiz':; E 510715097 - w = > \ z '� X CGKF.EO SiGftA(E I ' - - - �� � �� �I II �1� si SET STAINLESS p Y;mE-�^,. N88'35'09 '• `� ° I', \ U�(i SIFIl NAIL ___ 2zw°L•.. ; - �- �S� _ 1.+_It �wo 'NE2 X y). 0 9 Ai _ • •. R' _ //� sroaace`�or �)I / 1�—�' �v .r � M/ 75f q rF I f a•. 4"fi - ,. e = al �.,zY J k'. �t•1 �T�e�� ...' xE1 'sn]piml nv'T 1� 1 _ JV'P a `" oiw o ,, v_ a�� ./ .. Of n,/ ii,,v-; SI� �• m _ > [ 0-13A79'3Y^o- I C �'.: a _ CS `'� •.' '' , � BY•s'.roR cm=zz9a .a • o R=365.32' �,SS�otSs•s° �., '. n - / �// / ,��,. ? � '.; ^�';::e ,,.CITY Cr RENTON 0 O6 {' Iry -�H . r '-' �`�,:a" °� �1 , Fw i=871.06' C - / Ad / /iS 55 �� ei: �Oo�,s ,, ... IJ „.z '0,, I �`al Pr RENTON P .. ,_ y 1 '°:' 1� / ge /:--- /___.,-...."4 �d.—._ ``.p... "...'rig"'..-, — � �l /_I... . �, E 50760.3974 „ ` d. w, '.� �/ �� /.Hes� .. .. �ml rpy o- t' 9j - t,' :� !2 - . SET TAIX/lD� W R 50y LIL _ r/ /' :.. 11 , •1 �p 1hi,1 'J� ; �� 'so„a6'i ° �..:�..�_ a. 49°E wux \�` Bmr or Rr�rrs-JS.f/ �I •�==,ems'— ~` a-:. / 1 /,. 1,, % tyww° ' y0 • - a� i' . ) §i /?i%r'S{K'X.' ' ., -'`=7--=`7�?y�-�'/// �i/y!�i�> ,a� I.a\,/'1 /J ° <4C<4Q ;/ % ��j i,v� I I` 71 l/ 'ia 1 a=_.' =8 �' \�' F =k' ,.s , '� �i/// // / aif ile1q w ..\ \ 'f �'m I' , <rs�• \,// ° ° ' i%%/ o-4,-(..- ,1,- //(4,1,4, ' It.{ IW�' � i wI ,� ;:�.m soft 14 �_ �� h zY»Y» 1 �. /� , (�. ,.ij, f ` .1 '\ o .... ,vim ns f / a -11 .\ .,/ s, N 7 :/' ., `�� I //)% '1: 16,-�\ p -'� au asxxpol .=z46.i6 - . a: .—ae ✓ t,////, ////\\ �//�� '1®"„�;^.-'j _ Ewa1M b ' `` o �`y'Y . i. �z ^ � Lam.p.. . �.:. °a.'FTS af' 9i�. T � I' �' ...� ,., I �--// �. i. \��` tnp psi V/ `u� /�\i .., ,. 't�✓ �\ ��A�� e '.. I ,. \ Lip = \ /:,,////, /i %/%�%/ f I II�� �l� /rl /� �C YAV ' .r I.. ,.;-chi �4 / i(„,, ..,........„..,. ///i I i Ii. I}�; 1,1 III -. � j` 'b /j '£` 9 0 II I .II, / .. Wr m J • \'' ...\ icy,/ \\i IIIII III 1�I Vll�h // \_ b' :. �, /'�� CO s ram/ ///'/ (fill I `nl�l - ;� ;` ► — .,///,, i//,�/ i C,. ,I I III I IIIIIIII i ., g / \-. � Ti T 'e, .r ///�//j,/ 'jam/, %��jj�f:. I I pl I II I IJ� °J h�� -��\\'qS�' ., .24,..... C C Y fi`3 � f \ ////j�/// /�j�j/�/%/II� �I�II IIIII ',T.III�I _ \l:�I ''�`'9 "°„\�\\\94;"�`•ram•. \ s'� `2e' e�// �` - ,° O= _' y�\\ r /0//;/ '' i t �I�:III'111' �IL�11� '• ,,If'-"' ' � \ S \ a ' \, ,II II - IIIIILIII 11\'C�{II'\11', 1;:l.:$ �P.' ram °.. ��' ,d, " 7 r,:I /ll� H7�'II 'titl'�, �T�1.61:I\ 3 \. 1.':'/'',:,-" .1�'l� o 0. Nx. ; \° I�iirt,,I..ir//r%//��/,4/?L4..7,-a^ ,.z, 4'4 jl .) INi s ''\L1IInt� °T��`f/ ;Ifoligiii r/1/I/,'' / q $o LEGEND :� o ,� - €Yil ll� -�411101,140 II II j'��'I G�I' /�yp. 5,,„ ,.,,° - FF FlNISH Fl00R .. - 1 a Gil- II I 'u' 111± _ Fm FlRE OEPARINENT CPYNECBCM / J( 1�� \ I I•I I'II II_.I�,rI \' _ FH FlRE HI9RANT / 1, .n ,, �oAI'I Ii�III�IIIIiIi II III IIIIR _ D = STORY DRAIN Ii�I[ 1 �\` _°`� (y C\ ''N I% �l{I.I'1III' IIIIII II I[l. 'L��c - S = SANITARY SEWER \N I I 7 / �_ Dew Aep p `�� ti ° ° %I//'�II II`I\'I'�1 II1I'1\11'�,�,�\ 1 I C8 = BATCH BASIN I V sit J°6" a oer at V� 7 /:://rAl I11\`I;`\\\\\\\\\\Y`1\' T /y / gf ` °ae erev3�a ` ;', �. so aoll V ,\ \\,\,�, V\.:PjZ/ GRAPHIC SCALE / 'lo,, °j sr»., • `.11 I. :s.CE.:--z:e - _ -_ _ —_ - .. / • I {!,`',i i s='� a /'',r�Y �� oa 4 ... ,... ,- . ' r!► :stir: - :-'< ; 1_ i PROJECT INFORMATION • • 97= = s +r : it a� 1 k N LNG - - - - ON G VI/H IYPE- �... iy./M. a q s ZONNO EDMIN INDUSTRIAL) =I tL.� �'; 3SS( ra-� E.4., f 11 �r� �'. �.ii"- BULp G TYPE a DFI S :`('c^'-./->''i+`, _ Y kJ A. IT kJ y - • �'G T r. - Y 1 :Y mar k:^.y�' S i :r. OF R • OTT ENTON-PLANLENG DPASION rL ><- t,L W R00 S.WA 98 SOUTH r S"' �, .-8 RECKON. 98035 ':::':;:C.:':"... _ ,.`S- •i -..1+> •!'�: :AT,gpY- i:. � tor. :R=.;:•,r,� ,::;r�°y'.�^:-• . II'I - jr3''vt'h - - - 206 35-4.,W - ..,Y' '.'-+.i C'a::'::`}^ :•2�:. �RE1hT • tl `/ 'I E� - -z mot*=;•:t., .;r I SETBACK SMAY OF REQUIREMENTS X+- ;-R•,- ,A PEW TS 51183:C1 70 91E PLAN RENEW CURRENT /1.' " SETBACKS IMPROVEMENTS. ROV FROM 1 :I EA THOSE IN EFFECT DURING D SIGN CONS R fR" 19•-•'E IRUC ON .,::I t1 :li ,.- OF USING IYPR Ar�%''ir - ;Of}�6)•tlY� FRONDED: TRDNT ZO' SIZE•60'NN R _ _ vim:_•:Y:tl:i•y^: �.�'S�,', - il:^`i�:'rvt' ^-�ys \ TR/OI pVN �;• -• ; _ - 90E trU Mt W.RR'C7F jP1 1. THIS STE APPEARS ON NARONAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE NAP,DATED YAT • • %„Ij-:':::T�'1',.�.:,.y;,-t7..... ;•r•;. _--._ _ _ 16,1995,CONNUNITY PANEL NO.53033C0976F,AND IS STUATEO IN ZONE ::^"„i',''%, Y¢'i,•, - "•^t•'- -_� 'K'AREA DEPTHS OF TO BE OUTSIDE THE 500'YEAR FLOOD PWN MO ZRE •:A:-� _- - .FI.:.il;t2;; - yE I I• AN FLOOD DEPTHS OF I TO 3 FEET(USUALLY AREAS OF PUIIONG)BASE i I l gj'; N•s:$' - ~_' _ FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETE.INED(19'). '�,:•- !,. ,i I. ".... ^1 ,5 'i•:;fi'"'4° ,,y`'a'" '\•r. ---„ ,r, ,:II , d ,.is�•., ::. •�''.,ye:'•: {,'J.`h':F y%i• `•"�Ji , � .\VIRRRA N:PRiEF . f:'ii l+` •;•. ,. BUtPTO UOMUD ARE SHOWN AS INDICATED ON FEATURES LOCATED FURNISHED I'v.. i• FI,' ,w -}c.,,:^rr .--.. • _ BY ORAKS AND VERIFIED MIME PoS9BlE 8Y fEATAES COOLED 1N THE I.i'i I'!•;"'v.1%• $k'I'-'`�Y• "-^rR%1'+- , / • Pi' ,. _ _ I. FOOD, INT ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR TIE ACCURACY CF THOSE FECORDS II.: `� _: "Yj' C?1=J + aV-',.,�'r. '% \;;• -DA`p�(�c!'`i AD^ iT.• _ _ FOR RE FINAL LOCATION OF ELUSRNG UTurn6 IN AREAS CFERCAL TO ,I I ' i •.�II!''.".-:,?.., ;;'•^l,;„:•;::ti,'.'� - • _ r NfL\f44 P1 _ DESIGN CONTACT 1NE UTILITY GARNER ALENCY. ggryry�EMLY�r�.''� -SS'+�+� F•:h / •�-. SMNA�I::T:, I I ..'Kr - .i3w=,{C'y�:i. R,o IARF FDEITAE.E J v�^;;,^,. KiTFAMIIIOIHG !I: I —S';., s.f5i'n - - - - IJ :�i� • J:'E'i:�• I .,,,.,sitar,,�'"s:yce..'.?,,,. --.... '%�';`� ,n' -10a706-9p/4T- -- _ , 4' TOTAL SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE a 309,997 SO/FT ().12 ACRES) I 4" _','I ..• rzt ;iNr "r. '`'a1 WILDING SQUARE FOOTAGEY)"' ^` + 3Eti-'- YI,aF WAREHOUSE SQUARE FOOTAGE m 101.908 50/FT 1/' �i. I I•jQw +54'+=�^ "'��.'.' OFFICE SQUARE FOOTAGE a 9,600 50 i r •i''-2.:H'. _ __ _.�•, A _ ?• TOTAL$WARE FOOTAGE- 110.906 SO/FT g�NyAppONL¢M.IVf _ I - 5I i {' WILDING NOIPRNT FOOTAGE-1 i, ..:: :.:::i .�4- .a1''�3:,i.r�.lvr:- ;•._h•Su-::,T•:_�i....+` .ham tr`SQUARE 00 Q 06,106 SO/FT /s :;;I•_•,_'. I I -C -..? - - LYry. ��i �}t q. j.I� 1 CITF/PUII DING IGT CC/MACE PFRITNTAIIF I 'v"I'!•:-� ,,,,,'.' L1f;!%; y, ,� �'*Tit--�'S _ ) ir,:. ';e.' ,i:rsf(:c ,<:;'+ - - :�•`se"p'"H,',:, dkY.(, • ,Q. �I ��� BULLING a 3as 1 106 - •<:%:'_ 'I+C� --4'�y'''-s % It.2:4LIC '`. 1 c 0k. 50 I�',1.--:. i'%! - �:h i4F ..t'..::.yr.�:y. '"?`` ') - 1 PARKING/LOADING ADNG 4)f n1z)e m ri I - - _ - :y. !T.•4/2 U: TOTAL v ni((asi 3LY so TOTSURFACE) IIJ - ,#:z.:�::c - P/n.v[ SO/FT AL Md'WNWS '',.�d r, .' . ....,....... '''',. .-, -.,,,,.. '-'• - - - {+- I� I , PARKING. .�?t.: ��/I/..'�I/ �C`�.''r Lt v - - . • I,: - IMIIIIIMEM w`:L.�:'�• WAREHOUSE PARpNG SPACES REWIRED 1 PER ITiW a 68 'C•':' -^s•'.`�::_� �� 1e� �•'<�e :pt= e • DmcnnF` (Fal w:awE wmq:: ^:iF; I ��. .� OFFICE PARKIN:SPACES REWIRED(3-4,5 PER 1.000 SO/FT)-29-43 E'` _r ;:-t`,. Y,_ D).... ...� _ ` . TOTAL PARKNG SPACES REWIRED a 9)-110 -VAR.,- �*,�?:?�. :�jh::: ••�, =r',i; $::'?` • �q • li,�'L h:.,L';;•.<.�F: .Si..•;, i1• �ij;,:1ki - 5 /� HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES REWIRED -4 :F... - '. c,(.71'.4:�,: - �.'. / • '"^r^,-``zip��., ; _STANDARD ((9'4018.5'1161 PARKING DACES PRO IDED •] ,i, - 9'id PPRW G`.PACES PROVIDED �!30 ) ( 07 HARpCAPPED OUZO PARKING SPACES PROM DED ALL VAN _,yll TOTAL PARKING ACAS FRONDED-BB i'b'.' - • • - -_ 1'++`.-:..'%"':}y;=r�.•:-r,:T-;.;.•�". 4/ '� a ,I ARgN- ePIN PARYN� Al? - �f' � yy PD •1 A•• - v LANDSCAPING REWIRED 1T 1•.os F e) '%'';` zr - .5 2 S SO FT �.Zr'-��-'^.`, :��:�' *:y`, i9•'"�, LANDSCAPING PROVIDED-4494 .• 'I;"(I��I..L: ;1 tL•�i•1 / :`\'. .:,�f-i_ __-.Ci�Pyt.4:ti.i •i. / w 3 il 'lilt :•K' _ - - - t -`,'v, {V�� - sttwM • ' I i !I al liwl• 4 3"i= ,;L",i C', `I. .'' a1Rs u: ;;ire+.'`'.i�i .' .4�-• ,..). �ir. (- L� •i•'•' S';"$,'����s?.,:' '/•\", ,./t E '.j'. v+ ..IF,Ii t. • ti�,'' :;it' I4. _ M'ETR6 :' I..I::i :r. . - q, _ ., •..:;ikih'i i~4!:.=- _ • l ,• ARMY: raw ';�J.�r" .\!!;LZK-'(:. ,..4.,,...„.. ,.,..... r... ....„•.. ..., •,,f' /. i;f Comb n OCT ft i:, r::. ,Y� 5.. / A iseib ..... ,... . Al o ,L.a �a,_,.r.. M A N.- 1n I. • b• r� %Ii W.ERED STORFLE ( -N'\ b �._ — S '!,�0 � N8635'09•E �'��-, ?^C` } �1^�, o .' -- 1x(77 IL KW P. fZ 09Z— +/r,g Zai I , mhoSETBOJECT0E `/ �.,f8 �'Y j.('-i.a G 1 Z Y E,4 4El/A` Vy k��L�,Pe 'YjV '>7YP l U W. SETBACKS MAT DIFFER FROM THOSE IN EFFECT DURING DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION ' .�3 / y�;{ j r Z YCryff+ rA��+Y�K. �Y I� 5,� f''x �r�'.S'�S' r OF EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. r' FS� •f=_f ?''AS.lL,:.YJtµl..., w Tu+L .�:LLLU bCP L:.I tY D yy`i "� jj ...-,�-t' '- / . - _' PRONGED. FRONT-30'. 50E 60'MIN.. REAR-1.0' //fI { {>: ..y L 2.j`.,1 •S''.-_� 11'1..4 C °tea 0 I 2-$" G L1P `i }.�¢ _ / BW'A TOP1RJ - ROW)oNF J AKX�{I4 �F 55 :#''i�,s .� '� �n"c':;¢"11` c /ENzz. ia+ .p F T • THIS SIlE APPEARS ON NATIONAL ROOD NSURANCE RATE MAP,DATE°MAT � G A'f t L, Vj 'rw- c16.1993ACOMUUNIttPANEL NOSJOJ3C09)6F,ANO ISSINAIEDIN 20NE T„Fy (Ff 'I). L y. ~ s"K'ARE DETFRMWEO TO BE WiSDE THE SW YEAR R000 PWN AVD ZWE ) �f7 �r t rc,SJ rf ( ��0` �P & -s /ram 71 AH ROOD DEPTHS OF 1 TO 3 FEET(USUALLY AREAS°F PLNOING)BASE ' / tP-'4. 7 Mi-. . 'eye 'AA . °VIFL000 ELEVATIONS DETERYWEU(IT) J/, ,1.� �'RCTRUfNRFS. ( xR TJ 'j'T}.t 4 -N SG,r _ vBUR ED URUDES ARE SHOvm AS INO CAIED ON RECORDS MAPSNRNISVEO �/ YYY �A K,. ' qa� 'BTOTHEftSANOVER HEDWHERPOSSIBLEBYFEANRESLOCATEDINTHE ///•,' +i L h j �J�'' WE ASSUME NODABUtt FOR THEACWRACTD<THOSE 2,'L.T S. q •CEL+M',,M `FOR 1HE FINAL LWARW K E%iSBNG UBUBES N MEAS CRITICAL TO / / ' DESIGN CWTACT CA ON OF OWNER/AGENCY. "i+ .T V E��-li. { 5,,4` 1-0 GTF/R111101NG uto4pr FWTAGF ,Rb a$.y . 3 A. .am 11` 1.S,f06S0 I z F+ 1•; . ffiI : srrS��? \ e� r na «««TOTAL 51E SWARE FOOTAGE.309.997 SO/FT (].12 ACRES) f I IL �Av'`,� BUILDING SWARE FOOTAGE l I 4 ( .z?i ( F t` M I , - R' ..- WAREHOUSE SWARE FOOTAGE.IOt.9U6 SOFT ,fI Z, p� ,�N G'Y/ '"`/sK)' �tt ,� n )' - _ III' S-,0,WB��'9r OFFICE SWARE FOOTAGE 9.6W SO/FT ,, ,� p t t �y 1'J'3N t4,F� � �Qi• ..C� _ ,1 t•' Ne..a. \.- 101.SWARF FOOTAGE. 110.906 SO/FT Ya"A' �� / BURRING FOOTPRINT SQUARE FOOTAGE.t06.10fi SO \ 41 `,2 -3 'A�Yl,IL•}' A'.c�� ,,,,\ 1 VTF/B111101ND 101 roVFRAC.F PERrENTACF. \\ )•(,�y £5 5�,<r A "l t,/. ' n5 ``YSO' • 1)O 30• •=�i•�'' I,: , �,'� o'.`/:'/'A BUILDING .3.z((106.106 S0/FT)) ■ 6 A lI] 'z w- „'U�(" i .tiK^ •� ''$ _ 8' 1dPARKING/LOAD NG•.2S(131.n6 SOFT) T■i 4"i,:.:t,Fi��1�/4 ��' •( ry ,: • J - S /UN f•cIrout-nz 2J).J6.60/TT TOTAL MPERNWS SURFACE) ,.�� i� 11ti,h:� ��///� y r ° L �"" _= — p11i /4pAPN1NOL •2 1".14,, _ ./" �� ` 71`9ti S' .1'" L aWAREHWSE PARKING SPACES REW ED(1 PER 1,SW 50/Fi).fi8 . ��✓�'� �\A { n11414-•C 54t Eli �^ ,��l;R;•t•�.' T k"1Y'1 rI l4� .�.�:...OFFICE PARKA SPACES REW REO R AI PER 1.500 50/T).39-.3 /./ „./• ��� . `` A. ., y.hi 5'))L7e e. �'r'Xi} T' " ilt_S TOTAL PARKING SPACES REWIRED.9)-110 '. C+'" �lj�'`' F S 3' 11 ^i �^L!�t JP ., HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES REWIRED A II('I� J •-. /' -' 1�� �17, I ^"IK�{^�3 TAB T yY q pig fa I Ate-.:}'• O' ,,k,-,-,-1 '� i<x!II F �d!�'S./'S L t�'C".,�c..Ft "L �''T C / \ COMPACT(B.5'.16')PARKING SPACES FRONDED -) j?J�^ 1 ! _ )F l h '/ Sys, � • I 1 STANDARD(9'+20•)PARKING SPACES PRONOFD .BB ,=:%/ i/" .t0 1 .y Y ' l HANDICAPPED(9'.20)PARKING SPACES PRpNUEO..(ALL VAN ACCESSIBLE) ..�( �t j Fx (7 T,d ,L ,�Y.' "' '•t'14 �",""k'f L� '1 .C'' y TOTAL PARKING SPACES PRONGED.99 / 1 Y11t!1 Y`'A fy+: kygY c" A L 1e =r. PARKING LOT IANOSCAPNG(PARKING SPACES/SST II AK•I F`II ? �''' "a `lT 1.1[_t ". .F L.�""""l'1 0A 7': �, gR V - lANDSCAPNG REWIRED(I).513•.OS).B)S 50/FT �II��/ ' �A-(�' CY�tf x/,x/FCfS + LANUSCAP NG PRONGED.tA9A SO/Fi I4111 beJ -A '. `+�._, 1 ,r.�' i' f —' i•I 1 ..Oi�1 ��q q o^ ''', ..` t., vS'.. 5 u�'�-gip' la .�F C • IP a,1( o1P.. 9{^ �. �r�o `v+� ;.-1.,xsn c13` a' J�� uo¢ J a '� I eo Tr aF R-N*1lirP 4+ �`F is t"h�3 7a m c • l,'O -CI',,c L Ii /OA FBI¢.mc.Nx m m l "' E.=1291351.4 Ba/� �,�t,, i' A ,• M+o = 0 _ . }` I1 kSi ' tkr F e ono. ,NN I 1 Ij(Y$ t FND C RRR/CAP \ �'Y i'a• IL! Iw1a4 Z m S 40(.4//it..11,,':4 !U1 i ili(r' iii. T fv- i i 1 I(i , <: n METRO ) .. '1.;:///:-‘:11.:1'''-'-' e V , ,,------:, :':' • \\� IS °, % ` .. D.L. „OCT., ))1) ,'B N\\re �a``e SIT8 F'L.41�1 /' s No `7Z�3ZJ Z i northwest,L.L.C. - 915 -118th Avenue S.E. �1 OPuse Suite 300 Bellevue,Washington 98005 • 425-453-4100 Fax 425-453-1712 Apri116, 1999 CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED Ms.Jennifer Toth-Henning APR 6 1999City of Renton •1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 i;, ;111I-1-jii1G DIVISION Subject: North 405-Upper Site • Minor Site Plan Modifications Dear Jennifer: Enclosed with this letter is the revised site plan which reflects the current plans under review at your building department. Opus requests that this site plan be approved as a minor modification to the original site plan reviewed and approved by Renton. The changes are well within a 10% variation from the original approval. Below is a comparison of the site plans: Features: Original Approved Plan Current Plan Site Size 309,997 SF 309,997 SF Impervious Surface 77% (237,384 SF) 69% (214,656) Bio-Swale West Side of Property West Side of Property Parking Stalls 99 Stalls 91 Stalls Truck Parking 0 Stalls 4 Stalls Warehouse Area 101,906 SF 107,094 SF Office Area 9,600 SF 11,899 SF Building Orientation• Front Monster Road Front Monster Road Building Shape Rectangular Rectangular Landscaping 4,494 Square Feet 4,494 Square Feet As this table demonstrates,the basic site plans is very similar to the previously approved plan. There are no significant differences in the type of users expected for the project. Access,type of construction,type of use, general layout and landscaping are consistent with previous plans. Should you have any questions regarding the revised site plan,please feel free to contact me at (425)453-4100 or Randy Brown at Synthesis at(425) 869-1946. r, Sincerely, Ae-t oPezd . Ro r Pecsok Real Estate Representative cc: Randy Brown,Synthesis Brian Smith,Barghausen Bart Brynestad, Opus Northwest LLC Dave Kessler, Opus Northwest LLC Enclosure(site plan LD-1,4-14-99) Opus Northwest,L.L.C,is an affiliate of the Opus group of companies • Atlanta,Austin,Bellevue,Chicago,Columbus,Dallas,Denver,Ft.Lauderdale,Houston,Indianapolis,Kansas City,Miami,Milwaukee,Minneapolis,Orange County, Pensacola,Phoenix,Portland,Sacramento,San Francisco,Seattle,Tampa,Washington D.C. • 19991221001290 PAGE 001 OF 004 12/21/1999 12:04 KING COUNTY, WA CITY OF RENTON BS 11.00 Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA BILL OF SALE Property Tax Parcel Number:2 4230Li _c7/2_01p Project File#: Street Intersection: ►lions}cr lead S W Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Q pits No►--Ihwest-,LL C- 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation The Grantor,as named above,for,and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to the Grantee,as named above,the following described personal property now located at: a 5 ril ansic-r' Rot gen tzr 1,lam} e vss N in the City of Renton,County of King and State of Washington,to-wit: �/�`�` a,e2 wad a,v�.d G—W p s Vi=i%Allklkjit‘L-storfit- ceAs— Cervi 1114,,tur C4-474A44- ''''"'poyil)4j4,cit oltc-sel-fe ao we—a• • �' ° A'i! ghlte6 I VIT CV a-) By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person • rn or persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, Q' administrators and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal the. d year as writt b ow. 1,-jo?(qq Notary Seal must be within box INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) is,,,,SS,,,,,,,, I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that •%%i�0 W0 ','. Z . P4 signed this instrument and e .Q.e, S,ON F'' T acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes .mentioned in the instrument •• / alo�• (i✓&"I/ • N: PU B L\ ' 1,. S\lotary Public in and for the State of Washington '% '9.��' G.15-O2�`•�'t0 1 Notary(Print) Rot,I e, w0 ,,,,�,°' ,,A5c% •',, Dated My appointment ;0 7 ` t % 41q-o'o1 H:\FORMS\KCRECORD\BOS.DOC\bh Page 1 • • INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) o I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that rn signed this instrument,on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and of to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. N N Notary Public in and for the State of Washington rn Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) ,, �•, On this 714- day of a- .-- , 19 VT ,before me personally appeared •••`' �AN VI/ ''•• -��.••+ 3 . /'2a rs•a to me known to •• Q'.•`gS10p be of the corporation that �� tj,� EFo•;'� L executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free •• (04 NOTAR/•m': Z and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein •• • .°00•4.. tn: :mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said ( ' UB L1C :instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Z '•.oF WASN\� •"..,....,.•o`� Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) fob c- LJo My appointment expires: 6011 do O ti Dated: a,e� e,,,.�,_r -� 1 4 ct 9 H:\FORMS\KCRECORD\BOS.DOC\bh Page 2 • - I Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA BILL OF SALE Property Tax Parcel Number: 242304-9121 Project File#: Street Intersection: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Opus Northwest,L.L.C. 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation The Grantor,as named above,for,and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to o the Grantee,as named above,the following described personal property now located at: rn , c,./ WATER SYSTEM: Length BILe TYPe 687 L.F.of 12" " DI Water 0 774 LF.of 10" " DI . .Water Main L.F.of " Water Main 2 cachet 12" Gate Valves • _ cv _ each of 10" " Gate Valves - 5 each of 'Fire Hydrant Assemblies , rn SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: Length Type o' L.F.of Sewer Main CT) F L.F.of " Sewer Main • L.F.of " _ Sewer Main each of " Diameter Manholes each of " Diameter Manholes each of " Diametc Manholes STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: Length Size Type . L.F.of " Storm Line L.F.of Storm Line L.F.of " Storm Line each of " Storm Inlet/Outlet each of Storm Catch Basin each of - Manhole STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Incluri+ng Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk,Asphalt Pavement) Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk L.F. Asphalt Pavement: SY or L.F.of _ Width • STREET LIGIDTING: • €of Poles . - By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or , persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, • administrators and assigns forever. • . . CITY OF RENTON PLANNING, BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FINAL COST DATA AND INVENTORY NAME OF PROJECT WTR- a _c)B I to WWP- ,.--1-d81to Opus Monster Road SWP- • TRO-• Lk k-a 81 to TED- 4O-Q PAo Per the request of the City of Renton, the following information is furnished concerning final costs for improvements installed and turned over to the City for the above referenced project. HATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION COSTS: . Length Size Type 687 L.F.of 12" • DI WATERMAIN $7,436 774 L.F.of 10" • _ DI WATERMAIN• 7,740 • L.F.of • WATERMAIN• L.F.of WATERMAIN • 2 EACH of 12" • GATE VALVES 2,400 • • 3 • EACH of 10" • GATE VALVES 3,000 • EACH of GATE VALVES j 5 EACH of • FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLIES S 9,000 1 (Cost of Fire Hydrants must be listed separately) S 29,576 include Engineering and Sales Tax if applicable $ o ( g g PP� 2,366 o TOTAL COST FOR WATER SYSTEM S 31,942 • SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: ,STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM; • o Length Size Type Length . Size Type CD L.F.of • • SEWER MAIN L.F.of • STORM LINE. `- L.F.of SEWER MAIN L.F.of • STORM LINE L.F.of • SEWER MAIN L.F.of STORM LINE • N EA of • DIAMETER MANHOLES EA of STORM INLET/OUTLET N EA of •• DIAMETER MANHOLES EA of • STORM CATCHBASIN r- . (Including Engineering and Sales Tax EA of STORM CATCHBASIN if applicable) S ,. • (Including Engineering and Sales Tax TOTAL COST FOP.SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM S If applicable) S Cr) TOTAL COST FOR STORM DRAINAGE $ ,e— SYSTEM • STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Including Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk,Asphalt Pavement) Curb.Gutter.Sidewalk: L.F. S ' Asphalt Pavement: .SY or L.F. of Width S SIGNALIZATION: (Including Eng.Design Costs.City Permit Fees;WA•St Sales Tax) . • '. • STREET LIGHTING: (Including Eng.Design Costs,City Permit Fees,WA St Sales Tax) • of Poles S • 1I01..nel 'E. Pei"'Xc--ts 4as. — ►.I.S3 — cIIfao Print signatory name day ne if • s � /171!/�.1� . (SIGNATURE) I sormsICOSTDAT2.DOC/bh• (Signatory must be authorized agent _ or owner of subject development) 11 19991221001289 • PAGE 001 OF 007 Return Address: KING1COUNTY, WA City Clerk's Office • CiTY OF RENTON EAS 14.00 City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA Title: WATER LINE EASEMENT Property Tax Parcel Number. 242304-9121 • Project File#: Street Intersection or Project Name: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page . a, Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Opus Northwest,L.L.C. 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation cv 2. ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of the NW 1/4 of Section 24,T 23N,R 4E,W.M.,King County,WA rn Q' Additional legal is on pages 5 and 6 of document. an 619-d(Ot7 2321\029\99944.02 FAX FAX NOT AEQUIREL Page 1 King co Remits Divil„on _{ � Deptl . I , • I Grantor,for and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby,grants,bargains,sells,conveys,and warrants unto the said Grantee,its successors and assigns,a nonexclusive easement for water lines and necessary !I appurtenances over,under,through,across and upon the property(the"Easement Area")in King County, Washington,more particularly described on Exhibit A,attached hereto. A map showing the approximate location of the Easement Area is attached hereto,labeled Exhibit B,as a visual aid only. For the purpose of constructing,reconstructing,installing,repairing,replacing,enlarging,operating and maintaining water lines and necessary appurtenances,together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor,except as specified in this easement. Following the initial construction of its facilities, Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The Grantee shall,at its sole cost,promptly after completion of any work within the property covered 1 by the easement,restore the surface of the easement,and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work,as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. 2. Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the Easement Area as long as such use does not cr) unreasonably interfere with the easement rights granted to the Grantee. co Grantor shall not,however,have the right to: N a. Erect or maintain any buildings or structures within the Easement Area other than driveways, parking areas,sidewalks and curbs;or o b. Plant trees,shrubs or vegetation having deep root patters which may cause damage to or interfere with the utilities to be placed within the easement by the Grantee;or c. Develop,landscape,or beautify the Easement Area in any way which would unreasonably CV increase the costs to the Grantee of restoring the Easement Area and any private improvements j' therein. CTI rn d. Dig,tunnel or perform other forms of construction activities on the property which would disturb cr.) the compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities in the Easement Area,or endanger the lateral support facilities. e. Blast within fifteen(15)feet of the Easement Area. This easement shall run with the land described herein,and shall be binding upon the parties,their heirs, successors in interest and assigns. Grantor covenants that it is the lawful owner of the above property and that it has a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the easement hereby granted unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons, whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same by or through Grantor. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors,administrators and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this 94 day of lc G , 199a1. OPUS NORTHWEST,L.L.C. a Delaware limited liability corn any B y e..e.ori homas B.Parsons, Vice President 2321\029\99944.02 Page 2 L • Notary Seal must be within box REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss ,'oisse•••••,. COUNTY OF KING ��N WO ••• • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Thomas B.Parsons O • • StON'' ,, � ••• signed this instrument,on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the `�.�`' ,o•4 instrument and acknowledged it as the Vice President of Opus Northwest, • c *OTR)'_ L.L.C.to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and •• V •y N s purposes mentioned in the instrument. C • a . 2 �. -150 •••• ..............�,�G��` Notary Public in and for the State of.Washington. ••• �:.WASN�0. Notary(Print) %�L My appointment expires: 6 z,co '_— Dated: GIB /9 9 9 rn 0 N N e- cn 07 2321\029\99944.02 Page 3 , I II EXHIBIT A WATERLINE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION An easement for waterline 15.00 feet in width over, under and across that portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter and Government Lot 1, in Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, having 7.50 feet of such width lying 'I' on each side of the following described centerline: COMMENCING at the quarter corner between Sections 13 and 24, in said Township and Range; _ THENCE North 87° 26' 48" West, along the North line of said Northwest quarter, 1,214.00 feet to the Westerly margin of County Road No. 8, Charles Monster Road S.W. and now known as Steel Hill Road; j THENCE South 32° 29' 51" East, along said Westerly margin, 85.34 feet; THENCE on a curve to the right having a radius of 256.48 feet and along said Westerly margin, 139.14 feet; THENCE South 01° 24' 51" East along said Westerly margin, 268.00 feet; THENCE South 88° 35' 09" West, 436.55 feet; THENCE South 02° 33' 12" West, 115.03 feet; c' THENCE South 70° 05' 34" West, 95.47 feet; 11 THENCE South 88° 37' 17" West, 54.81 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of herein described centerline; o THENCE South 00° 07' 11" East, 19.50 feet; THENCE North 88° 48' 50" East, 58.83 feet to Pont "A"; I N THENCE South 01° 26' 15" East, 70.79 feet; cv THENCE South 88° 13' 14" West, 30.26 feet; THENCE North 88° 13' 14" East, 30.26 feet; o-, THENCE South 01° 23' 15" East, 129.45 feet; rn THENCE North 88° 36' 42" East, 88.37 feet; rn THENCE South 54° 09' 20" East, 60.23 feet; THENCE South 36° 20' 38" West, 17.86 feet; THENCE North 36° 20' 38" East, 17.86 feet; THENCE South 53° 59' 13" East, 85.33 feet; THENCE South 76° 09' 22" East, 26.84 feet; THENCE South 53° 39' 22" East, 155.42 feet; THENCE South 36° 33' 04" West, 17.19 feet; THENCE North 36° 33' 04" East, 17.19 feet; THENCE South 53° 40' 23" East, 70.73 feet; THENCE South 71° 26' 40" East, 24.58 feet to Point "B"; THENCE CONTINUING South 71 ° 26' 40" East, 15.50 feet to the Westerly margin of County Road No. 8 (Charles Monster Road S.W.) and the terminus. ALSO from said Point "A"; THENCE North 88° 48' 50" East, 2.20 feet; THENCE North 68° 49' 54" East, 109.24 feet; THENCE North 18° 14' 46" East, 67.05 feet; Project Name: Opus Northwest December 7, 1999 • Page 4 DJS/sm " 6686L.006 I " THENCE North 88° 35' 11" East, 178.05 feet; THENCE North 01° 24' 50" West, 50.76 feet; THENCE South 01° 24' 50" East, 50.76 feet; THENCE North 88° 34' 39" East, 225.86 feet to said Westerly margin and the terminus. ALSO an easement 25.00 feet in width having 12.50 feet of such width lying on each side of the following described centerline: BEGINNING at said Point "B"; THENCE North 18° 33' 20" East, 40.50 feet to the terminus. The sidelines of this easement shall be shortened or lengthened as necessary as to intersect at angle points, said Westerly margin, and a line which passes through the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING at a bearing of South 88° 37' 17" West. ; \CI are; ITO cr.) co ' CV 4• `7� 1 use N • -•.=1/15/60 N O? Q, Cl) e-- I Project Name: Opus Northwest December 7, 1999 Page 5 DJS/sm 6686L.006 1.• N . I . I EXHIBIT B EASEMENT AREA MAP WATERMAIN EXTENSION . 11 CO 1'-120' 1 co co N 8R' 35'09" F 436 55' __7, CO N —• N01'24'50"W S01'24'51"E 1 N 581788'035:11"W 50.76' 64.65' 1 i a N 88' 37'17" E "ri "1 x` 105.38' "� I N00'07'11"W o . i ^ S18'14'46"W 15' WIDE WATER 19.50' Z 67.05' EASEMENT (TYP.) o o N 70' 05'34` E S88'34'39"W 5I 5L S " .47' 225.86' 1 684954W 0 o ' 109.24'4' S884850 PT " w Q (nc, 58.83' AS88'48,50W 2.20' in C " N re)M S012615E CO • M CC I 6i 70.79' o CD S88'13'14"W SO1'23'15"E N o rn 30 26 129.45' CD o rn N54'09'20"W =20' 00'00" Z11 N88'36'42"E 60.23' R=256.48' 0 °' 88.37' T=45.22' M N N N53'59'13"W L=89.53' ,r w 85.33' rn i� S36'�0'38"W -\ S76'09'22"E In rn i-= co ry 17.86 26.84' S53'39'22"E 2 a O 155.42' 3 O f`r. a CI cn ,4 15' WIDE WATER o 6, co \ 0N, • S� EASEMENT (TYP.) ,co co- o g p��p�l 9S9'�2?, S36'33'04"W ,- `� x * 17.19' co co Oil). \ N 1 B'33'20" E co co O,� '� 40.50' co o RF�'Ip 25' WIDE WATER z N �� EASEMENT w z S53'40'23"E S 71'26'40" E z 70.73' 15.50 j S 71'26'40" E PT B co 24.58' co co 0 0 Y N 0 (!i 0. N L': PAGE 6 %I i 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this 9lkday of bed , 19 99 OPUS NORTHWEST,L.L.C. a Delaware limited liability company B • Thomas B.Parsons,Vice President Notary Seal must be within box REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS ����.��.����� COUNTY OF KING,i ) �•`� \N WO/ ,s'• I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Thomas B.Parsons �• Q �5 � ,� . signed this instrument,on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the �� '°'o instrument and acknowledged it as the Vice President of Opus Northwest, s0�OTARr �N L.L.C.to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and •• iv .• c purposes mentioned in the instrument. o (PA., PUBLA� =2 -15- C9 o ,�••,�OF�"���� k\ ,• Notary Public in and for the State of Washington G .'.�.�.W,S'`��� Notary(Print) I?Pb 1 k w0( My appointment expires: 6 I(rI a O D"1- N Dated: ale (Iel 0i rn � cn rn i i - c i,., :. CITY F RENTON ''salL '' Planning/Building/Public Works Department ` Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator . June 14, 1999 ' Mr.Roger Pecsok Opus,Northwest,LLC 915 118th Avenue SE, Suite 300 Bellevue,WA 98005 'I SUBJECT: OPUS UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE(FILE NO.LUA-97464, SA-H,V,ECF)--PROPOSED REVISIONS TO APPROVED SITE PLAN • Dear Mr.Pecsok: • On April 16, 1999,we received a letter and revised site plan from you for the Upper Monster Road Warehouse. You have requested that the site plan be revisited and that proposed changes be considered as a minor modification to the approved site plan. At the time that the proposal was • . being considered by the Hearing Examiner,the site plan reflected the needs of a potential site occupant. Ultimately,that party decided not to exercise their option to purchase the'property and occupy the site. Opus is now close to an agreement with another end-user,whose needs differ from other potential purchasers. Therefore, slight revisions to the site plan are requested to accommodate that party. - Revisions or adjustments to an approved site plan are reviewed to determine whether the changes are minor and can be processed administratively, or whether the changes are considered to be major adjustments requiring an amended application and decision from the body that originally approved the project. 'According to Code Section 4-9-200:G major adjustments involve a substantial change in the basic site design plan, intensity,density,use, and the like generally involving more than a ten percent(10%)change in area or scale.) As we understand,the following modifications are proposed to the previously approved site plan for the Opus Upper Monster Road Warehouse are as follows: . • The size of the proposed building would increase by 7,487 square feet from the original approval. The original site plan proposed 111,506 s.f of development (101,906 s.f. as warehouse and 9,600 s.f as office). The revised site plan proposes 118,993 square feet of development(107,094 s.f.warehouse and 11,899 s.f. office). • The building footprint would increase from approximately 106,000 square feet for the approved project to 118,993 square feet for the revised site plan. • The amount of impervious surface would decrease from 237,384 s.f. or 77%lot coverage under the approved project,to 214,656 s.f. or 69%lot coverage with the revised site plan. H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLANINGUTI RUPMSTR.DOC 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 a v v Page 2 June 14, 1999 • The number of parking stalls would increase from 99 spaces to 111 parking stalls. The total amount of required parking for the revised alternative ranges from 108 to 125 stalls. The warehouse requires 72 stalls and the office requires a minimum of 36 to a maximum of 54 stalls. Furthermore, an additional 4 truck trailer parking stalls would be provided with the revised plan. • The proposed bio-filtration swale would be relocated to the eastern property boundary, and would be sized to accommodate the decreased amount of impervious surface. • The original plan featured a total of 33 dock-high loading doors and three grade-level doors located on the north,west and south facades. The revised proposal includes 10 dock-high loading doors with 4 grade-level door located on the north,west, and south facades. The building shape,height, and orientation would not change with the project revisions. Access would continue to be from two driveways on Monster Road SW. The amount of proposed landscaping would remain the same. And,while the building size would increase,the amount of impervious surface would decrease slightly. The proposed revisions to the approved Site Plan for the Upper Monster Road Warehouse, File No. LUA-97-164,SA-H,V-H,ECF are considered to be within the minor modification or 10% threshold for revision, and would not require an amended application or re-review from the City's Hearing Examiner at this time. This determination is based on the judgment that the basic site design plan, intensity, density,use and the like are generally the same, with no more than a 10% change in area or scale. This determination will be final unless a written appeal of this administrative determination-- accompanied by the required$75.00 filing fee--is filed with the City's Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the date of this decision. See Section 4-1-050:F of the Renton Municipal Code for further information of the appeal process. Please feel free to contact Jennifer Toth Henning at: (425)430-7286 if you have any questions or would like to discuss this correspondence. Since Vk 0 -s, . evelopment Services Director cc: Parties of Record 91 - UP4- sw CITI JF RENTON mu. ` ' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor June 26, 1998 • • Mr. Tom Parsons Opus Northwest, LLC 200 112th Avenue NE, Suite 205 Bellevue,WA 98004 SUBJECT: OPUS UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE (FILE NO. LUA-97- 1 664,SA-H,V,ECF) -- PROPOSED REVISIONS TO APPROVED SITE PLAN Dear Mr. Parsons: On May 18, 1998, we received a letter and revised site plan drawing from Opus Northwest, requesting that modifications to the approved Site Plan for the Upper Monster Road Warehouse be reviewed and considered for approval. The proposed revisions represent the needs of a particular occupant and use for the site, the WOSCA Shippers Cooperative. We understand that WOSCA is seeking to relocate from Seattle to the subject site, in the 1200 block of Monster Road SW. Subsequently, Opus provided additional information that was received June 10, 1998 which provided clarification of the proposed site plan revisions. According to Renton Municipal Code Section 4-31-33:F, revisions or adjustments to an approved site plan are reviewed to determine whether the changes are minor and can be processed administratively, or whether the changes are considered to be major adjustments requiring an amended application and a decision from the body that originally approved the project. (Major adjustments involve a substantial change in the basic site design plan, intensity, density, use, and the like generally involving more than a ten percent(10%) change in area or scale.) The proposed modifications to the approved site plan for the Opus Upper Monster Road Warehouse as we understand them are as follows: • The size of the proposed building would be reduced by 25,657 square feet. The approved plan proposed 111,506 s.f. of development (101,906 s.f. warehouse and 9,600 s.f. office). The revised site plan proposes 85,849 square feet of development (64,449 s.f. warehouse and 21,400 s.f. office). • The building footprint would decrease from approximately 106,000 square feet for the approved project to 75,766 square feet for the revised site plan. • The amount of impervious surface would increase from 237,384 s.f. or 77% lot coverage under the approved project, to 245,611 s.f. (75,766 s.f. buildings area and 169,845 s.f. parking lot and truck maneuvering area) or 79% lot coverage with the revised site plan. • The number of parking stalls would increase from 99 stalls to 107 stalls. The total amount of required parking for the revised alternative ranges from 107.1 stalls to H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\JTH\UPMNSTRV.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 [=1 Tl.le..n.n.n.n1. ....cno/•.e....nluA m•I...el 7no%....e1 n..nn ...... • Page 2 - June 26, 1998 I 128.5. The warehouse requires 42.9 stalls and the office requires a minimum of 64.2 to a maximum of 85.6 stalls. Furthermore, an additioi 92 truck trailer parking stalls • would be provided with the revised plan. !' • The proposed bio-filtration swale would continue to be located along the western property boundary, but would be sized to accommodate the increased area of the parking lot/maneuvering area. The bioswale would move slightly to the west in to provide adequate truck parking and maneuvering. The bioswale would be located closer to the detention system, and could require that the swale be located on an easement outside of the current site boundary. Since both parcels are under the same ownership, a lot line adjustment could be accomplished between the sites if it is necessary to maintain the bioswale on the same parcel. • The original plan featured a total of 33 dock-high loading doors and three grade-level doors located on the north, west and south facades. The revised proposal includes 51 dock-high loading doors with one grade-level door located on the north, west, and south facades. The building shape, height, and orientation would not change with the project revisions. Access would continue to be from-two driveways on Monster Road SW. The amount of proposed landscaping would remain the same. And, while the building size would decrease, the amount of impervious surface would increase slightly to provide truck trailer parking and maneuvering/circulation areas. The proposed revisions to the approved Site Plan for the Upper Monster Road Warehouse, File No. LUA-97-164,SA-H,V-H,ECF are considered to be within the minor modification or 10% threshold for revision, and would not require an amended application or re-review from the City's Hearing Examiner at this time. This determination is based on the judgment that the basic site design plan, intensity, density, use and the like are generally the same, with no more than a 10% change in area or scale. This determination will be final unless a written appeal of this administrative determination -- accompanied by the required $75.00 filing fee -- is filed with the City's Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the date of this decision. See Section 4-8-11 of the Renton Municipal Code for further information of the appeal process. Please feel free to contact Jennifer Toth Henning at: (425) 430-7286 if you have any questions or would like to discuss this correspondence. Sincer ly, r mes C. Hanson Development Services Director cc: Parties of Record 1. '�:•, , �� a+r oienrm,�-1 --"- IY(lli --_ • • • • • , i4., i_---- _ . •_-N8B'35'09'E__.- - 4J6:55'•- �_�__.......- .. _ i ' ',/._I t ..-. Ito.if/-..'!--.�' -` `tee-- - ,,, __ __ L: _4;: -' Iyy1� 1 :>;a, orb- PROJECT • 1 f .H In E N0233':12� /,�1r. '. •. _ - '�. •� '1.;i 1• a,A--.•R• =i • INFORM I :I, > n5.o3 IR: l: .. .r.I ;> ya• .a , !:I! • / / /• •ZONIN �,OTT ,,, D :26/215-2500 I ~I...:I;:. ./ J=fQ plq TP ,SS d ACS i _ I'v nR+aaT zETawa REwNwdrs slal.ccr m s¢PUN RENEN. ISRlRENT .'' i .. • :• 4 T-91�ri -Z s<,BAGxs NAT arTOR FROM THOSE N arEer OURNC oeslo./wNsmurnoN •.,;_ : ,.:,i / *C`'-Cr LA6DNG WPROKN[FRO I' �(/ '• �I • FRONDED: FRONT.IO'. 90E.60'MIN.. REAR.160' f - --• — I"l ]DooaNa9�5 • iNG SITE APPEARS CH NATIONAL FLOOD NSLR.FC[RATE YAP,DATED WT 'i ' ` •• • 1p�� ...; - ib•1995,CWYIReM1 PANEL NO.SJO]1COD)ef.ANO IS 9NATED N 20NE ,s..v ' -,.1� • LyyAC1 p�- _• 0'p,�„ x MU DE,ER,wEO TO BC fL190C DRf SOO TCM rL000 RAN A]p 2ONC • � AN rLDCo DEV T,rs or 1 To 1 FEET Nsu.ur MUs Q vaaxc)RASE '. •' 1.-q , ROOD EIEVATOIS DETERMINED ft97. gRRsrarTlxrP. • E _ .. • h I • • SUR¢G UILTICs ME sxO.N AS WDGI[p w.PCC000S MAPS runrua.w ;i' _) 75,7fifi SOFT' ] BY OIMCRS AND VERSED MERE POSSIBLE BY FEARWCs LOCATED IN I12 ': V •, 1 rF(P, 9E ASSUME NO WBNTT TOR 11E ACOIRACT Cr THOSE RECORDS. ,'• T ' rDR TIE FINAL LOGTON or[NOTING U1LTC5 w AREAS ORInGL r0 ...•.•".. "-. • •DESIGN CONTACT TIE UTILITY OMNW/AGENCY. i Ife RS _• - - �I•:i Trf�. SIT AUeIOMC STIVARF FMTAI'F. l• ..•..•- .. F.F.FF .747 • TOTAL SITE 500ARE FOOTAQ.209.997 SO/FT (7.12 ACRES) • - I - �':: 11 (t BOILING SWARC FOOTAGE ,•, OFFICE$WMS'[i00TACC oo FOOTAGE -6aA19 50/ri •:..I f.:• �. • ..� _ • . - ':/ -\ TOTAL SW ARE;DOTAGE. 615.049 SO/fl - -DUUTING FOOTPRINT SOVARE FOOTAGE-)5.)66 SO/FT $NIT/MIND.:INT Y:•PAT PFAMITAT• LY•/ -. ♦ _ ' �• (1104 ff 1 • ELRtONG -24S C71,766 SO/Fn •':. :':. 16)'f1NM,0 gARe - -tr .h-' PARKING/LOADING..2s(I11.2)e SO/Fn �.:M1 TO AL.ODD 20$OH SO/FT TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE) PARRmr 'I/:•%i!' ' " .•'� .�� p9)G9n rnR G9ms� . _ i _ RMDNIUSE PARxNG SPACES MECUM.) PCR I.SOO SOFT - - - Qr2L PMRwc SPACES REIIUIRED 11-. PER,KO sorrTi-e:9e : • - - c a r PA • _ • 20'00'00' -y ? TOTAL PARK..SPACES REIXARm-La)-u9 ,=o /�I_ R 256:48' •�� si.2 - `,� • Q•].i `i�[o1 T N 45.22' HANDICAPPED PMKINC SPACES REWIRED .5 ,' J.. .......... • _ ' COMPACT(6l116]PARKING SPAf2:5 PRONGED -12 • ,•'•''' ... 1 - ``�; ,' - : - - "'�,L.. 89.53' STANDARD 65'.1.PARKIN SPACES FRONDED fYr:!t'! o $ i.i i hANDMAPPm 19']i0l PARNMG!PARS Vgi1VIDFD- S(ONE VM ACCESS®lLl ��•::!"i:•i.'"^' '/'' '' - :A'< ,. �.% TOTAL PMANG SPACES FRONDED.IO] :(• 'O. ' • TRADER PARNNG SPACES FRONDED .92 ��'. N4> , ` _. .Y:y • •• • co • ik: j•' rt�l`• -.�. Sp _ �: 11 .:Yi ?yAS , :�,.5 ill .1,''' ,, ,..'• 0:gl 0 31%*.IC li • Si:c>••''••... ....°4,•—':76::::-/—.• :, `Op • gru r , • • • • • • • •.�. .:, S i 4: is '�• c,A 'moo] • • -.. \ -' / if NL 2r n»scrn • v ;�•- SiTE �L.4N.1 // • // �, Y..Al CITT l OF RENTON •. ii City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen • April 15, 1998 • • Mr. Roger Pesok Opus Northwest LLC 200 - 112th Avenue NE, #205 Bellevue, WA 98004 • Re: Appeal of Site Approval for Upper Monster Road Warehouse; File No. SA-97-164 Dear Mr. Pesok: At the regular Council meeting of April 13, 1998, the Renton City Council adopted the recommendation of the Planning and Development Committee regarding the referenced • appeal. The Council reversed the decision of the hearing examiner and granted the requested variance with the condition that upon completion of grading activities,the applicant shall be required to revegetate areas disturbed as a result of clearing and grading activity. A complete copy of the Planning and Development Committee report is enclosed for your information. If I can provide additional assistance or information,please feel free to call. • Sincerely, ` ,47z, Marilyn IV.rsen City Clerk cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Council President Bob Edwards Jennifer Henning,Development Services Division • -Enc. • • 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)235-2501 /FAX(425)235-2513 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer • RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting April 13, 1998 Council Chambers Monday, 7:30 p.m. Municipal Building MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF KING PARKER, Council President Pro tern; RANDY CORMAN; TIMOTHY COUNCILMEMBERS SCHLITZER; KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER; TONI NELSON. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS BOB EDWARDS AND DAN CLAWSON. CARRIED. (Councilman Clawson arrived at 7:35 p.m.) CITY STAFF.IN JESSE TANNER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative Officer; ATTENDANCE ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney; MARILYN PETERSEN, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; MIKE KATTERMANN, Director of Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning; KAREN MARSHALL, Human Services Manager; DENNIS CONTE, Housing Assistance Specialist; RON STRAKA, Utility Engineering Supervisor; LISA GRUETER, Senior Planner; COMMANDER FLOYD ELDRIDGE, Police Department. APPROVAL OF MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES THE MINUTES OF APRIL 6, 1998, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. APPEAL Planning & Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Planning & Development report regarding the appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision to deny a Committee variance for the Upper Monster Road Warehouse project (1200 Monster Rd. Appeal: Upper Monster SW) to allow clearing on slopes in excess of 40%; appeal filed on 3/18/98 by Rd Warehouse, Opus NW, Roger Pecsok, Opus Northwest LLC, 200 - 112th Ave. SE #205, Bellevue, SA-97-164 98004 (File No. SA-97-164). The Committee met on April 7, 1998 to consider the appeal. The applicant seeks a variance from the City's land clearing and tree-cutting ordinance (Section 4-9) in order to clear areas where the slope exceeds 40%. The applicant appealed the decision of the Hearing Examiner dated March 5, 1998. The subject property is located at the 1200 block of Monster Road SW. The applicant seeks to develop a 111,270 square foot warehouse and office on 7.11 acres. The Committee found that there is substantial error of fact and/or law in conclusion #2, that the applicant does not suffer undue hardship. There are unique circumstances surrounding this site. There are no naturally occurring slopes due to the mining by a prior owner. Additionally, the proposed use seems the most appropriate use for this site. Therefore, the Hearing Examiner's conclusion that there is no undue hardship because the applicant can construct a smaller building is in error. Even with a smaller building, the same clearing would be required on the site. Alternatively, a considerably smaller building could be constructed without calling for the same magnitude of clearing. However, to require such a small building on this site would make it unattractive for sale and would therefore eliminate any incentive to develop this site for this use. Additionally, part of the site plan involves the construction of a bioswale on the west side of the site. That bioswale will be connected to an off-site retention pond to the west of the site. To require the April 13, 1998 Renton City Council Minutes Page 126 relocation of the bioswale to any other location on this site would create an undue hardship in connecting the bioswale to the retention pond. Further, the Committee found that the other requirements for a variance would be met. Specifically, revegetation of the cleared areas would be an enhancement to the subject property. Therefore, the Committee recommended that the City Council reverse the decision of the Hearing Examiner and grant the requested variance, with the condition that the applicant shall be required to revegetate areas disturbed as a result of clearing and grading activity. Further, the applicant shall accomplish this revegetation immediately upon the completion of grading activities. Finally, the Committee recommended that the City Council reverse any conditions which were imposed in the Hearing Examiner's decision which are not consistent with the granting of the variance. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, • COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Councilmember Clawson arrived at 7:35 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published Building: Building in accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Tanner opened the public Moratorium Request hearing to consider extending the moratorium on building permits, land use (Newcastle "Hook") permits and subdivision permits on property to be deannexed to the City of Newcastle, located in the vicinity of Lake Washington Blvd. NE, NE 50th St., and SE 72nd Street. Mike Kattermann, Director of Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning, reported that Newcastle has requested that the 70-day moratorium adopted by Renton on 2/02/98 be extended to allow time for completion of the annexation process. Staff recommends the moratorium be extended for six months or until the property is annexed by Newcastle, whichever comes first. Audience comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY • PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. (See page 130 for resolution extending the moratorium.) ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 1998 and beyond. Items noted included: * Community Program Specialist Audrey Moore and DARE Officer Russ Radke represented Renton's Police Department at Valley Medical Center's Kid Fair on April 4th. * The City co-sponsored, with the Chamber of Commerce and the • Renton School District, "Renton Youth Day" at the Renton Community Center. * The groundbreaking ceremony for the Daily project was held April 13th. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. APPROVED BY PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORT Date ' "/3"98 April 13, 1998 OPUS Upper Monster Road Warehouse Variance Project File#LUA-97-164, SA-H,V (Referred April 6, 1998) The Planning and Development Committee met on April 7,.1998 to consider the appeal of OPUS Northwest. The applicant seeks a variance from the City's land clearing and tree-cutting ordinance(section 4-9) in order to clear areas where the slope exceeds 40%. The applicant appeals the decision of the Hearing Examiner of 5 March 1998. The subject property is located at the 1200 block of Monster Road SW. The applicant seeks to develop a 111,270 square foot warehouse and office On 7.11 acres. The committee finds that there is substantial error of fact and/or law in conclusion#2, that the applicant does not suffer undue hardship. There are unique circdmstances surrounding this site. There are no naturally occurring slopes due to the mining by a prior owner. Additionally,the proposed use seems the most appropriate use for this site. Therefore, the Hearing Examiner's conclusion that there is no undue hardship because the applicant can construct a smaller building is in error. Even with a smaller building,the same clearing would be required on the site. Alternatively, a considerably smaller building could be constructed without calling for the same magnitude of clearing. However,to require such a small building on this site would make it unattractive for sale and would therefore eliminate any incentive to develop this site for this use. Additionally,part of the site plan involves the construction of a bioswale on the west side of the site. That bioswale will be connected to an off-site retention pond to the west of the site. To require the relocation of the bioswale to any other location on this site would • create an undue hardship in connecting the bioswale to the retention pond. - Further, the committee found that the other requirements for a variance would be met. Specifically, revegetation of the cleared areas would be an enhancement to the subject property. lidtA ifs mi ! 2 Therefore, the committee recommends that the City Council reverse the decision of the hearing examiner and grant the requested variance with the conditions that the applicant • shall be required to revegetate areas disturbed as a result of clearing and grading activity, and further,the applicant shall accomplish this revegetation immediately upon the • completion of grading activities. Finally,the committee recommends that the City Council reverse any conditions which were imposed in the hearing examiner's decision which are not consistent with the grant of the variance. ,‘72 I it/ eleyekk.), tjAza.j athy Ke• ker-Wheeler, Chair a Tim Schlitzer, ' e-Chair • Dan Clawson, Member • • • city4.08:ma April 6, 1998 Renton City Council Minutes Page 117 said he was not aware of any such regulation that has been able to withstand judicial challenge. Citizen Comment: Beckley Phillip Beckley, 655 Ferndale Ct. NE, Renton, 98056, said the Highlands - Sale of Drug Community Association is planning to perform a study on the secondary Paraphernalia impacts of sex-oriented businesses. He was also concerned about the sale of drug paraphernalia in the Highlands, and suggested that Renton, along with other municipal jurisdictions, lobby the State to prohibit the sale of such items. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. CAG: 98-023, 1998 Street City Clerk reported bid opening on 3/31/98 for CAG-98-023, 1998 Street Patch, Lakeridge Paving Patch project; six bids; engineer's estimate $204,568.60; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, Lakeridge Paving Co., in the total amount of $155,072.40. Council concur. Appeal: Upper Monster City Clerk reported appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision to deny a variance Rd Warehouse, Opus NW, for the Upper Monster Road Warehouse project (1200 Monster Rd. SW) to SA-97-164 allow clearing on slopes in excess of 40%; appeal filed on 3/18/98 by Roger Pecsok, Opus Northwest LLC, 200 - 112th Ave. SE #205, Bellevue, 98004 (File No. SA-97-164). Refer to Planning & Development Committee. Vacation: Aberdeen Ave City Clerk submitted petition to vacate a portion of Aberdeen Ave. NE and NE/NE 33rd St NE 33rd St.; petition filed on 3/25/98 by John J. Tharp and Marilyn Tharp (Tharp/Clise, VAC-98- Clise (represented by Rob Purser, 16016 - 118th Pl. NE,, Bothell, 98011). 002) Refer to Board of Public Works; set public hearing on 4/27/98 to take testimony on the request. (See page 119 for resolution setting the public hearing.) CAG: 97-175, Mazda & Community Services Department submitted CAG-97-175, Asbestos, Lead and Holm Bldgs Asbestos, PCB Abatement of the Mazda & Holm Buildings; and requested approval of Lead & PCB Abatement, the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $74,917.44, Wm Dickson Co commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $3,615.71 to William Dickson Co., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Planning: Newcastle Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department "Hook" Deannexation recommended that a public hearing be set for April 13, 1998, to consider extending the building moratorium imposed on the "hook" area to be deannexed to the City of Newcastle. Council concur. Community Event: River Executive Department requested waiver of permit fees for Renton River Days Days Permit Fee Waivers activities endorsed by the Renton River Days Board of Directors; and for & Banner Installation permission to install River Days banners on City light poles for approximately six weeks from June 29 through August 15, 1998. Refer to Community Services Committee. Human Services: Housing Human Services Division recommended approval of new policies for the City's Repair Assistance Program Housing Repair Assistance Program to assist in the delivery of services. Refer Policies to Community Services Committee. Legal: DOE Determination Legal Department submitted proposed ordinance adopting the Department of of Non-Significance Ecology's optional Determination of Non-Significance process which would be Process more efficient for use in certain smaller projects. Refer to Planning & Development Committee. CITY t,F RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: b. SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: 4/6/98 Dept/DivBoard....City Clerk Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen AGENDA STATUS: Consent XX SUBJECT: Public Hearing Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision; Correspondence... Upper Monster Road Warehouse; Ordinance File No. SA-97-164 Resolution Old Business EXHIBITS: New Business A. City Clerk's letter Study Session B. Appeal(3/18/98) Other • C. Hearing Examiner's Report&Decision(3/5/98) RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Refer to Planning and Development Committee on 4/7/98. I Legal Dept Finance Dept Other FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Expenditure Required Transfer/Amendment.... Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated SUMMARY OF ACTION: • Appeal filed by Roger Pecsok,accompanied by required fee received on 3/18/98. • March 23, 1998 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING MARILYN J. PETERSEN, City Clerk for the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 23rd day of March, 1998, at the hour of 5:00 p.m your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail to all parties of record, notice of appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision filed by Roger Pecsok of Opus Northwest (File No. SA-97-164). Marilyn t rsen, CMC, City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 23rd day of March 1998. LA(MAk Brenda Fritsvo d Notary Public in and for t State of Washington, residing in 1 , • Roger Pecsok 200 112th Ave NE, #205 Bellevue, WA 98004 City of Tukwila Planning Dept. Attn: Jack Pace 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Alan Bessette 2215 N 30th St Tacoma, WA 98403 Jennifer Toth Henning Neil Watts S d L d I ti 'G £ id 3 3 e H L i I A -� CIT OF RENTON City Clerk ,11 Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen March 23, 1998 APPEAL FILED BY: Roger Pecsok, Opus Northwest LLC RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision on the Upper Monster Road Warehouse Site Plan and Variance,File No. SA-97-164 • To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8,Renton City Code of Ordinances,written appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision regarding the Roger Pecsok request for site plan and variance has been filed with the City Clerk. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-16.B.,within five days of receipt of the notice of appeal,the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeals and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee at 1:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 7th, 1998, in the 5th floor conference room of the Renton Municipal Building,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton, 98055. The recommendation of the Committee will be presented for consideration by the full Council at a subsequent Council meeting. Attached is a copy of the Renton Municipal Code regarding appeals of Hearing Examiner decisions or recommendations.. Please note that the City Council will be considering the merits of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a showing can be made that additional evidence could not reasonably have been available at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. For additional information or assistance,please feel free to call. . Sincerely, _ _ 040 Mari yn Pr •en, CMC City Clerk • Attachment 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)235-25014 FAX(425)235-2513 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer City of Renton City Code Title IV-Building Chapter 8 -Hearing Examiner Section 16 -Appeal 4-8-16: APPEAL: Unless an ordinance providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court, any interested party aggrieved by the Examiner's written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Clerk upon a form furnished by the City Clerk,within fourteen(14)calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with the fee schedule of the City. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) A. The written notice of appeal shall fully,clearly and thoroughly specify the substantial error(s)in fact or law which in the record of the proceedings from which the appellant seeks relief. Facsimile filing of a notice of appeal is authorized pursuant to the conditions detailed in Renton City Code Section 4-8-11C. (Ord.4353, 6-1-92). B. Within five(5) days of receipt of the notice of appeal,the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten(10)days of the dates of mailing of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. C. Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents,including the written decision or recommendation,findings and conclusions contained in the Examiner's report,the notice of appeal, and additional letters submitted by the parties. (Ord. 3658,9-13-82) D. No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required,the Council may remand the matter to the Examiner for reconsideration. The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the appellant. In the absence of any entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or ' additional evidence or testimony,it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council,and that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. (Ord. 4389, 1-25-93) E. The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record,the Hearing Examiner's report,the notice of appeal and additional submissions by parties. F. If,upon appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to Section 4-8-10A and after examination of the record,the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record,it may remand the proceeding to Examiner for reconsideration,or modify,or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. • G. If,upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to Section 4-8-1OB or C,and after examination of the record,the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record,or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified,the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration,or enter its own decision upon the application pursuant to Section 4-8-1OB or C. H. In any event,the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord. 3658,9-13-82) heappeal.doc • APPEAL C!i1'O= RE�i;Ot; HEARING EXAMINER __ M A R 1 8 1 y j U WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING L.I.�MINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDAi iON TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL. FILE NO. LUA-97-164, SA-H, V CITY APPLICATION NAME: Upper Monster Road Warehouse (North 405 - Upper 'Sir a) The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the decision or recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated March 5 19 98 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE(IF ANY): Name: Roger Pecsok, Opus Northwest LLC Name:Roger Pecsok, Opus Northwest LLC Address: 200 - 112th Avenue NE, #205 Address: 200 - 112th Avenue NE, #205 Bellevue, WA 98004 Bellevue, WA 98004 Telephone No. (425) 453-4100 Telephone No. ( 453-4100 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: • FINDING OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's report) No. Error: PLEASE SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE Correction: CONCLUSIONS: No. Error: PLEASE SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE Correction: OTHER: No. Error: PLEASE SEE ATTACHED NARRATTVE Correction: 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation,if desired) X Reverse the decision or recommendation and grant the following relief: Approve Variance Modify the decision or recommendation as follows: Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other 1 6 hoc>5 N Appellan 17►resentative Signature Date , NOTE: Please refer to Title IV,Chapter 8,of the Renton Municipal Code,and Section 4-8-16,for specific procedures. heappeal.doc I North 405-Upper Site ; NARRATIVE APPEAL Opus Northwest LLC LUA-97-164,SA-H,V \ FOR CLEARING ON STEEP SLOPE. , Opus Northwest LLC is providing the following clarifications to the Hearing Examiner's conclusions regarding his decision not to grant a variance from clearing on slopes in excess of 40%. The slopes are located to the South and along the West property line of the site It is incorrect that the proposed project will substantially alter the natural contours of the site or that a taller building can be built to make up for lost site area. This site has been previously graded and now the majority of the site is not in its natural state, so denial of the variance would not help maintain natural slopes. The intent of the code appears to be to reduce the possibility of erosion. There is minimal vegetation on these slopes in their • existing state; Sitework performed under the proposed project would provide for an engineered and stable slope after completion. In addition, it is not a feasible alternative to build a taller building to makeup for diminished site area since the proposed project is for a warehouse facility with high clear heights; additional floors cannot be constructed to make up for a smaller footprint and users for this type of zoning would not be accommodated. The denial of the variance would prohibit reasonable use of the site since a strict interpretation of the steep slope variance would render one half acre of valuable land useless without providing any offsetting benefit through retaining the current condition of the site. There are legal restrictions on certain developments which intrude on sensitive areas such as wetlands, streams and steep slopes. These restrictions are generally reasonable due to the environmental impacts of such development. However, a restriction on clearing the steep slopes requested in this variance will only impact land which has minimal to no environmental benefit in its current condition. Such a strict interpretation of the code will reduce the level of use and value of the land with no offsetting benefit to the community. Approval of the Variance Request for this project would not be a grant of special privilege or create a precedent that contradicts the intent of the code. Instead it will allow a reasonable interpretation of the code consistent with its intent. A variance will allow the maximum use of land intended for the Medium Industrial zoning designation. It is for these reasons that we request approval of this variance request. 4 CIT1 DF RENTON NAL City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen March 23, 1998 APPEAL FILED BY: Roger Pecsok, Opus Northwest LLC RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision on the Upper Monster Road Warehouse Site Plan and Variance, File No. SA-97-164 To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision regarding the Roger Pecsok request for site plan and variance has been filed with the City Clerk. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-16.B., within five days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeals and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee at 1:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 7th, 1998, in the 5th floor conference room of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, 98055. The recommendation of the Committee will be presented for consideration by the full Council at a subsequent Council meeting. Attached is a copy of the Renton Municipal Code regarding appeals of Hearing Examiner decisions or recommendations. Please note that the City Council will be considering the merits of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a showing can be made that additional evidence could not reasonably have been available at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. For additional information or assistance,please feel free to call. Sincerely, Mari yn . .en, CMG City Clerk Attachment 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)235-2501 /FAX(425)235-2513 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer APPEAL CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER 'MAR 1 8 1998 WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL. RECEIVED FILE NO. LUA-97-164, SA—H, V CITY CLERK'S OFFICE APPLICATION NAME: Upper Monster Road Warehouse (North 405 — Upper Sire) The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the decision or recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated March 5 19 98 . 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE(IF ANY): Name: Roger Pecsok, Opus Northwest LLC Name:Roger Pecsok, Opus Northwest LLC Address: 200 — 112th Avenue NE, #205 Address: 200 — 112th Avenue NE, #205 Bellevue, WA 98004 Bellevue, WA 98004 Telephone No. (425) 453-4100 Telephone No. (425) 453-4100 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDING OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's report) No. Error: PLEASE SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE Correction: CONCLUSIONS: No. Error: PLEASE SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE Correction: OTHER: No. Error: PT,RASR SRE ATTACHRT) NARRATTVR Correction: 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) X Reverse the decision or recommendation and grant the following relief: Approve Variance Modify the decision or recommendation as follows: Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other PJS 1�11 . /il h2��( I ) /g 9 s N L Appellan ret resentative Signature Date NOTE: Please refer to Title IV,Chapter 8,of the Renton Municipal Code,and Section 4-8-16,for specific procedures. heappeal.doc • City of Renton City Code • ( Title IV-Building Chapter 8 -Hearing.Examiner,,'. Section 16 -Appeal 4-8-16: APPEAL:' Unless an ordinance providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court,any interest party aggrieved by the Examiner's written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Clerk upon a form furnished by the City Clerk,within fourteen(14)calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with the fee schedule of the City. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) A. The written notice of appeal shall fully,clearly and thoroughly specify the substantial error(s)in fact or law which in the record of the proceedings from which the appellant seeks relief. Facsimile filing of a notice of appeal is authorized pursuant to the conditions detailed in Renton City Code Section 4-8-11C. (Ord. 4353, 6-1-92). B. Within five(5)days of receipt of the notice of appeal,the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten(10)days of the dates of mailing of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. C. Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents,including the written decision or recommendation,findings and conclusions contained in the Examiner's report,the notice of appeal,and additional letters submitted by the parties. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) D. No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required,the Council may remand the matter to the Examiner for reconsideration. The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the appellant. In the absence of any entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony,it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council,and that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner: (Ord. 4389, 1-25-93) E. The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record,the Hearing Examiner's report,the notice of appeal and additional submissions by parties. F. If,upon appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to Section 4-8-10A and after examination of the record,the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record,it may remand the proceeding to Examiner for reconsideration,or modify,or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. ii G. If,upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to Section 4-8-10B or C,and after examination of the record,the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record,,or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified,the City Council may remand the • proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration, or enter its own decision upon the application pursuant to Section 4-8-10B or C. H. In any event,the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) heappeal.doc 1.6 North 405-Upper Site NARRATIVE APPEAL Opus Northwest LLC LUA-97-164,SA-A,V FOR CLEARING ON STEEP SLOPES Opus Northwest LLC is providing the following clarifications to the Hearing Examiner's conclusions regarding his decision not to grant a variance from clearing on slopes in excess of 40%. The slopes are located to the South and along the West property line of the site It is incorrect that the proposed project will substantially alter the natural contours of the site or that a taller building can be built to make up for lost site area. This site has been previously graded and now the majority of the site is not in its natural state, so denial of the variance would not help maintain natural slopes. The intent of the code appears to be to reduce the possibility of erosion. There is minimal vegetation on these slopes in their existing state; Sitework performed under the proposed project would provide for an engineered and stable slope after completion. In addition, it is not a feasible alternative to build a taller building to make up for diminished site area since the proposed project is for a warehouse facility with high clear heights; additional floors cannot be constructed to make up for a smaller footprint and users for this type of zoning would not be accommodated. The denial of the variance would prohibit reasonable use of the site since a strict interpretation of the steep slope variance would render one half acre of valuable land useless without providing any offsetting benefit through retaining the current condition of the site. There are legal restrictions on certain developments which intrude on sensitive areas such as wetlands, streams and steep slopes. These restrictions are generally reasonable due to the environmental impacts of such development. However, a restriction on clearing the steep slopes requested in this variance will only impact land which has minimal to no environmental benefit in its current condition. Such a strict interpretation of the code will reduce the level of use and value of the land with no offsetting benefit to the community. Approval of the Variance Request for this project would not be a grant of special privilege or create a precedent that contradicts the intent of the code. Instead it will allow a reasonable interpretation of the code consistent with its intent. A variance will allow the maximum use of land intended for the Medium Industrial zoning designation. It is for these reasons that we request approval of this variance request. !rr r / g • CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ditat �; ; Send Copies to: Jo PO )Z Vrl0` ,1-- I CITY ATTORNEY ' t :A fl CITY COUNCIL('' ws r Copy i n of Ud z� P �s '"��4 FINANCE/INFO SERVICES I. FIRE DEPT/FIRE�REVENTION r La TSp vI ' { HEARING EXAMINER fi + 111910 ® , (.2'ftPAHOUSING&HUMAN SERVICES Ol t�v�.V,,;-.. A - P.. MAYOR/EXECUTIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES l„ C fi1✓3I"�R� ! HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK MGMT. INA' ►,,;1 �i Iel, PLANNING COMMISSION C r purl/ POLICE NEWSPAPER C •iWe CODIFIER r vta,'y;(",d 5 PARTIES OF RECORD Nit a j PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS 0 d 1 ADMINISTRATIONCIre9J Z►mrne"1"14v AIRPORT j,;i„ If&iSo✓f ' a DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I,utry Mea-ta'dz5 Building/Zoning/Plan Review I PLANNING&TECHNICAL SVCS.°' (La41e(II)a"v1 Property Management 1 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS 5ati%4", 1/.11'61°' Traffic Engineering I UTILITY SYSTEMS RO I 0 tin I tit ! I DUPLICATE RECEIPT DUPLICATE RECEIPT CITY OF RENTON CITY TREASURER REG/RCPT : 02-27685 C:03-19-1998 CASHIER ID c N 09:29:00 A:03-19-1998 5007 APPEALS & UAIVERS $75.00 500.000.00.345.81.00.000003 TOTAL DUE $75.00 RECEIVED FROII: OPUS NORTH?JEST LLC CHECK $75.00 TOTAL TENDERED $75.00 CHANGE DUE $0.00 DUPLICATE RECEIPT DUPLICATE RECEIPT AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King ) MARILYN MOSES , being first duly sworn,upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 5th day of March,1998, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. C---717( Signature: SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 6-01 day of Mitiik , 1998. 71uc/Iwk Notary Public ' and for the State of Washington, residing at ,therein. Application, Petition, or Case No.: Upper Monster Road Warehouse LUA97-164,SA-H,V • The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. gqe 1S h � p0 �► �' HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT March 5, 1998 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest, LLC Upper Monster Road Warehouse File No.: LUA-97-164,SA-H,V LOCATION: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To develop 111,270 square foot warehouse and office on 7.11 acre site. Requires variance from the Land Clearing Ordinance to clear slope areas. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on February 10, 1998. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report,examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the February 17, 1998 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,February 17, 1998, at 9:50 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity/zoning map application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Proposed site plan Exhibit No.4: Landscape plan Exhibit No. 5: Building elevations Exhibit No.6: Grading plan Exhibit No.7: Land clearing plan Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest,LLC Upper Monster Road Warehouse File No.: LUA-97-164,SA-H,V March 5, 1998 Page 2 The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by JENNIFER TOTH HENNING,Project Manager, Development Services,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,Washington 98055. Applicant requests site approval and a variance for land clearing. This is a site that is located in the Green River Valley portion of the City near its borders with Tukwila. It is near the regional Metro waste water treatment facility. The proposed site is zoned for medium industrial development. It is currently vacant and is covered with brush. The applicant is requesting a variance from the land clearing and tree cutting ordinance to accomplish land clearing activity in small slope areas that are greater than 40%. There are no trees coming down, only a clearing of the under-story. The overall proposal is to develop an 111,000 square foot warehouse and office facility on this site which is a little over 7 acres in size. The building footprint for this proposed structure would be about 106,000 square feet. There would be four office nodes at each corner of the structure and those would be about 2,400 square feet in size. There would be parking provided for 87 vehicles and there would also be 52 dock high truck doors and 4 on-grade truck doors in anticipation of a heavy warehouse use. This is a speculative proposal at this time. Impervious surfaces occupy 77%of the site when developed and that is in the form of the building and parking,maneuvering and circulation areas. This project had to go through the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)several times because of issues with previous activity on the site. This site was previously mined for coal and the geotechnical consultants made recommendations to accomplish construction on this site to allow the development to proceed as proposed. One recommendation regarding over-excavation would be taking out the first 20 foot depth of the area on the western portion of the site, compacting it in a traditional means and then constructing the structure. The second option was for deep dynamic compaction which is where a heavy weight is dropped several times over the mine remnant area from a height of about 30 to 50 feet to consolidate and compact. There are a number of environmental impacts that could occur if that were the chosen method of construction. The ERC decided to remove that from this project application and to require a separate environmental review and a separate application if that method is chosen. Grading is required to create a flat area for this large building. Applicant has stated that they would have to cut about 48,000 cubic yards and then they would use that material to fill 42,000 cubic yards of area that needs to be filled and they would strip off top soil in the amount of about 11,000 cubic yards. The finished floor elevation of the building has been raised about four feet from the original drawings which results in the need to ' only export about 5,000 cubic yards of material. The ERC issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)on January 20, 1997,and there were no appeals filed. The ERC placed several conditions having to do with following the geotechnical ' recommendations. Another mitigation measure had to do with transportation impacts. Their construction activity and hauling is limited to off-peak hours and they are required to pay the appropriate traffic and fire mitigation fees. This area is designated Employment Area-Valley in the Comprehensive Plan(CP). The surrounding land uses in this area are primarily industrial in character. The proposal would be industrial in character and would blend in. Traffic trips based on the square footage of the structure are estimated at about 530 trips per day. The applicant has not shown any onsite recreational facilities,but staff is recommending that they do provide some. They will be required to extend the City's bicycle trail in a bicycle lane along the Monster Road frontage of this site. There is a landscape plan which indicates trees and shrubs proposed along Monster Road creating a thick buffer or transition area. This distance is actually about 15 to 20 feet of landscaping on the site and an Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest,LLC Upper Monster Road Warehouse File No.: LUA-97-164,SA-H,V March 5, 1998 Page 3 additional 20 to 30 feet off the site, so it varies from 25 to 50 feet of landscaping. Because this is in the Valley portion of the City there is an agreement with U.S. Soil Conservation Service to set aside 2%of the entire site in natural habitat. The applicant has areas that are set aside for grasses, but staff is recommending additional landscaping in those areas in addition to the grasses. This structure would be located at the base of a prominent knoll which in a sense would absorb the building which would be 27 feet in height. Design of this building has been accomplished to locate the majority or bulk of the building along the Monster Road frontage on the east and to use the flatter portion of the site for site development. The steeper areas,the coal mine hazards, are located to the west so that is why the building is located 15 to 20 feet from the property line on Monster Road. The applicant has utilized building modulation and articulation to define the office pod areas at the four corners. There are large areas devoted to vehicle circulation. Two driveways are proposed from Monster Road, one at the north portion and one at the south corner. Once on site the vehicles would utilize parking stalls around the perimeter of the site or they would access the dock-high or on-grade doors which are located along the north,west and south facades. Staff is recommending that applicant provide additional raised walkway areas near building entrances for people coming from the parking area, as well as calling attention to those areas either with awnings or additional landscaping. The site plan does not show the location of garbage and recycling areas, but staff has recommended that this be shown prior to issuance of any building permits. This proposal would not detract from property values. It would install improvements. It would reclaim a site that has been previously used for mineral extraction. There are 12 inch water mains in Monster Road and also in an easement at the northeast corner of the site. Years ago the site participated in an agreement with the City for a regional storm water system. This is in an area on an adjacent site with a large storage pond and a wetland area. This applicant is going to be running their storm water through a bioswale and then putting it into this regional system. A new waste water main and manholes with connection to the Metro system are going to be required. Staff would recommend approval of the site plan subject to several conditions. The first would be compliance with the ERC's mitigation measures. Secondly,to revise the site plan to demonstrate the availability of some sort of recreation onsite, either active or passive. Additional habitat landscaping is recommended in the interior portion of the site per the City's agreement with U.S. Soil Conservation Service. The site plan needs to be revised to show the location of the recyclables and trash areas,as well as additional raised walkways along the building frontage at the office entrances to increase pedestrian safety. Also some additional features, either additional landscaping or architectural features such as awnings to define the areas where the general public could enter those buildings. It is recommended that a covenant be recorded to run with the land notifying owners of their responsibility to maintain landscaping in perpetuity. Further recommendations are that the roof equipment be screened;that the applicant provide a lighting plan;that they either provide the appropriate amount of parking or seek and successfully obtain an administration modification,or decrease the size of the office or warehouse use to eliminate the need for the parking;to provide a sign warning of bicyclists on Monster Road. Regarding the variance, code requires that this applicant obtain a variance from the land clearing and tree cutting portion of the code as there are slopes greater than 40%. There are no trees on this site and only the understory vegetation would be cleared. Applicant indicates that large warehouse projects such as proposed Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest,LLC Upper Monster Road Warehouse File No.: LUA-97-164,SA-H,V March 5, 1998 Page 4 require a relatively flat site. Large buildings and truck maneuvering areas require that only very minor grades are present. The topography of the subject site includes the hillside on the west. The Examiner asked if there really was a hardship on this site, or if it could be avoided by scaling the building back somewhat. There are site constraints and obviously they are bound by them. Ms.Henning responded that a smaller building could be constructed on the site,but that the market seems to want warehouses that are 100,000 square feet in size. The areas that need to be cut back and cleared are typically on the southwestern portion of the site. They need to be pushed back in order to create the circulation areas. Another way of handling that is to redesign the building. There is a hardship in that this site has a number of constraints. There are steep slopes, coal mines, adjacent wetlands. There are unique aspects of this site that require the applicant to seek the variance if they want to accomplish their project. Grading is planned for the construction of the parking areas and the bioswale. The applicant has noted that the location and shape of the steep slopes would provide an irregular grading area which would make a very large portion of the site unusable and therefore the project much less practical; The applicant has stated that the construction of the facility would not damage the public welfare or injure the property or improvements in the vicinity. Clearing would be immediately followed by grading which would stabilize the site and hydroseeding with an erosion control mix. The applicant has stated that the granting of the variance would not constitute a special privilege in that grading of the area is necessary for the development of the site. The type of project proposed which is consistent with the existing zoning typically needs a very large area of flat and level land due to the building size and truck maneuvering areas. The applicant has stated that the variance requested is a minimum variance in that the location of the steep slopes is at the edge of the proposed grading area. Staff is recommending approval of this variance subject to a condition that the applicant be required to revegetate the areas disturbed as a result of the clearing and grading, and that this be accomplished immediately upon the completion of the grading activities. Roger Pecsok,200 112th Avenue NE,#205,Bellevue, Washington 98004, applicant herein, stated that this proprosal is consistent with current zoning and the CP,and that it would be impractical to build any other type of project in this area. They have worked with the ERC regarding the mine issues and the grading and feel they have been properly addressed. Because of the site constraints,the grading variance is necessary to make development practical on the site. He further stated that this development will benefit the adjacent properties. Alan Bessette,AHBL Engineerings,2215 N 30th Street,Tacoma, Washington 98403, applicant architect and engineer, explained the history and use of the regional detention facility. There is a pump system located on the northwest corner of the wetland that maintains the level of the wetland. The water is then pumped through a bioswale and released back into the river. Applicant's intention is to release their storm water based on that agreement into that facility. He stated that the material here is a fractured sandstone which is typical of coal mining areas. It is a very hard material and probably difficult to remove. There is a ridge that extends along the west property line which slopes both east and west, and it is important that this be removed in order to get the truck maneuvering areas. Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest,LLC Upper Monster Road Warehouse File No.: LUA-97-164,SA-H,V March 5, 1998 Page 5 This site is an expensive site to develop, so if the building square footage cannot be maximized it becomes very difficult to do anything with the site. Neil Watts, Plan Review Supervisor,Development Services,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton, Washington 98055, gave a brief history of the drainage for this particular area. There is now a regional privately-owned pump station that is owned by all these property owners. There is a signed maintenance agreement in place for that pump station. The only provisions required of the separate remaining parcels was that they provide water quality treatment before discharging to the wetlands. That is shown on the site plan as a water quality Swale. They could also choose at a later date to replace that with some type of wet vault system that would provide equivalent water quality. Mr. Watts also addressed the traffic issues in this area,both as they exist now and the preliminary design studies for future alignment of both Monster Road and Oaksdale Avenue. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:00 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS &DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,Roger Pecsok,filed a request for approval of a Site Plan together with a variance to allow the construction of a warehouse and office. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit 111. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located in the 1200 block of Monster Road. The subject site is located on the west side of Monster Road and west of the main Metro treatment plant. 6. The subject site is a very irregularly shaped parcel of approximately 7.11 acres. Its front property line follows the curve of Monster Road and is approximately 700 feet long. The parcel is approximately 640 feet deep. The parcel narrows to approximately 280 feet wide approximately 400 feet west of the frontage and then widens slightly at the rear property line. 7. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 4086 enacted in September 1987. 8. The subject site is zoned IM(Medium Industrial). Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest,LLC Upper Monster Road Warehouse File No.: LUA-97-164,SA-H,V March 5, 1998 Page 6 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of employment generating uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 10. The subject site slopes upward north to south toward a knoll located at its southwest corner. The slopes vary from approximately 50 feet to approximately 120 feet in elevation. There is a steep drop-off located west of the site. There are some additional topographic features located within the site which cause additional local variations,but the central portion of the site running east to west is more gentle ranging in elevation from approximately 65 feet to 90 feet. The slopes in the extreme southwest corner of the site exceed 40 percent and have vegetation on them. 11. The applicant proposes extensive grading in this central portion of the site to create a building pad with a finished floor elevation of approximately 72/76 feet. Since staff has determined that the extensive grading is tied to a proposed building project,no Special Permit for fill and grade has been required. The removal of vegetation in the steep 40 percent slope area does require a variance. 12. Old coal mine tunnels or workings have been identified in the vicinity of and under the western portion of the subject site. A geotechnical report was prepared. The ERC specified certain conditions for development of the subject site to reduce subsidence potential. Stripping to depths of approximately 20 or more feet will be required, or in the alternative, additional environmental studies would be required if a process called "deep dynamic compaction"were used. 13. It appears that the subject site,while having very steep slopes, is not subject to sliding or substantial erosion. The underlying strata is a rocky layer. As noted,though,there is a subsidence issue due to potential abandoned coal mine workings from earlier in the century. 14. The applicant proposes developing an approximately 111,000 square foot warehouse and office structure centered more or less north to south and located closer to the frontage. The building would have a slightly bowed front facade and offset,two-story high, corners where the office uses would be located. These features would create an articulated facade to break up the nearly 300 feet of length along Monster Road. The southwest corner of the building would also step north, away from the hillside slope. An alternate plan was originally submitted by the applicant and reviewed by staff but was withdrawn just prior to the public hearing and was not reviewed. 15. The building would be approximately 27 feet tall with the two-story offices at the corners. These office areas would be approximately 1,200 square feet on each floor,2,400 square feet near each corner for a total of 9,600 square feet. There would be 52 dock-high bay doors,together with four additional truck doors in the north, south and west facades. 16. There would be parking for 87 vehicles. Staff calculated that the applicant either needed additional parking, a deviation from the parking code, or a reduced building area.Vehicular circulation would be around the building served by a driveway at the northeast and southeast corners of the parcel. Parking would be located in single aisles along the north and west property lines with a small,multi-aisle lot at the southeast corner of the site. There may be sight clearance issues with the southern driveway. 17. The applicant proposes landscaping the perimeter of the site,with an emphasis along the Monster Road frontage. Some of the proposed frontage landscaping would be located in the Monster Road right-of- way. Staff has noted the applicant would be responsible for its upkeep. The parking areas would be broken with some larger specimens. The area the subject site is located in is subject to a minimum of Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest,LLC Upper Monster Road Warehouse File No.: LUA-97-164,SA-H,V March 5, 1998 Page 7 two percent(2%) landscaping in accordance with the City agreement with the Soil Conservation Service. Additional habitat landscaping will be required. Staff noted that recreational amenities have been omitted. 18. The applicant proposes cutting approximately 47,805 cubic yards of material and filling with approximately 42,373 cubic yards of material to create a finished grade. Materials will be reused on site as appropriate. The applicant will also be stripping topsoils and brush. Excess materials will be exported. 19. The applicant has proposed that some of the grading work be accomplished in an area with slopes in excess of 40 percent. This would entail removing any vegetation and then altering the terrain by removing and regrading those steep slope areas. 20. The Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Ordinance requires a variance when slopes in excess of 40 percent will be cleared of vegetation. The applicant,therefore,has applied for a variance to allow the removal of vegetation from those steeper slopes. 21. Storm drainage will be handled by on-site and off-site provisions. The applicant is entitled to take part in an off-site detention system that was developed in common a number of years back. CONCLUSIONS: Variance 1. Variances may be granted when the property generally satisfies all the conditions described in part below: a. The applicant suffers undue hardship caused by special circumstances such as: the size, shape, topography, or location where code enforcement would deprive the owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by others similarly situated; b. The granting of the variance would not materially harm either the public welfare or other property in the vicinity; c. The approval will not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other property in the vicinity; and d. The variance is the minimum variance necessary to allow reasonable development of the subject site. The applicant has reasonable use of the subject site without the need for a variance. 2. The applicant does not noticeably suffer undue hardship. While there are topographic features on this site that make development more difficult,the applicant is already regrading most of the parcel which has less severe slopes. There is little reason to intrude into the steepest slopes to remove vegetation in those areas,too. This case differs substantially from two recent cases where the only reasonable method of discharging sanitary sewer and storm water was to construct utility lines down and across very steep slopes. There were no real practical alternatives in those cases. Without variance relief the applicant can still develop the site although not as intensely as sought. The applicant can alter the Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest,LLC Upper Monster Road Warehouse File No.: LUA-97-164,SA-H,V March 5, 1998 Page 8 nature of the proposed building or the proposed use. By building a somewhat taller building or just a modestly reduced building,the applicant can make use of the subject site. As is,the applicant is substantially altering the natural contours of the site. Infringing into the slopes that are over 40 percent is unnecessary to make reasonable use of the site. 3. The applicant's wish to construct a larger building is not sufficient when the variance criteria clearly suggest that approval is only appropriate if denial would deny the applicant reasonable use of the subject site. Clearly,the applicant can construct a smaller building and is doing so on another parcel of similar size. While a variance was granted in that case by the Board of Adjustment,that site has much more severely constrained topography as well as a large storm water detention system on it. This site is different from the applicant's companion site. 4. The approval of the variance would probably not harm other property in the vicinity of the subject site. Its main harm would be creating the precedent of allowing vegetation removal when it is not necessary for reasonable development of a particular parcel. If this variance were approved it would lead to similar requests anywhere steep slopes are encountered even when they do not preclude reasonable development. If a variance would be approved it would constitute a grant of special privilege, or in the alternative, as noted lead to requests for similar variances. As noted, in cases where variances have been approved there were no reasonable alternatives. 5. The variance requested is small considering the fact that almost the entire site's topography will be dramatically altered. Site Plan 6. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use as modified to avoid the need for a variance, satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest,LLC Upper Monster Road Warehouse File No.: LUA-97-164,SA-H,V March 5, 1998 Page 9 7. The denial of the variance will mean that the building will have to be redesigned and possibly somewhat relocated to work around the steeper slope. The applicant may either reduce the depth of the building or cant the southwest corner of the building somewhat more to avoid the slopes. 8. The proposed office and warehouse building appropriately provides some additional employment opportunities in the northern reaches of the Green River Valley in keeping with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 9. The warehousing and associated office uses are compatible with the Medium Industrial zoning attached to the subject site. Building and fire code compliance will be checked when actual construction drawings are submitted for review. 10. The development of the site,particularly the extensive grading and filling of the site,may have an impact on surrounding properties but the site is fairly well isolated. The large building might have been overpowering but the terrain and the lowrise nature of the use will help limit its bulky appearance. The hill which will remain to the south of the building also will draw some attention away from the building. The facade modulations will help break up the apparent bulk of the structure, and while not set back from Monster Road,there will be landscaping and screening to soften the facade when viewed from the street. 11. The immense regrading of the site will strip most natural vegetation from the site and cover much of the site with impermeable surfaces. This is another reason to restrict any additional work in the steeper sloped areas of the site. They will not have to recover from additional grading work. There appears to be reasonable landscaping around the perimeter of the site and all disturbed areas will be restored. The proposed frontage landscaping will be located on both the subject site and the public right-of-way. The applicant will be responsible for maintaining this landscaping. 12. The development of the site,particularly in its rather isolated location, should have a minimum impact on surrounding properties and should not affect property values of surrounding property. 13. The site and its access have been designed to regulate the flow of larger trucks to the perimeter of the site and provide adequate maneuvering space for them to access the dock areas. The south driveway may require special attention or signs due to sight distance along the curve. 14. The low scale of the building and terrain features should permit adequate light and air to enter the site and minimize any potential impacts on adjacent property. 15. Appropriate utilities can serve the site. Storm water was considered when a common facility was designed downslope to the west. 16. In conclusion,the propose use as modified appears to serve the public use and interest. DECISION: The Variance is denied. The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest,LLC Upper Monster Road Warehouse File No.: LUA-97-164,SA-H,V March 5, 1998 Page 10 1. The building shall be redesigned to work around the steeper slope. The applicant may either reduce the depth of the building or cant the southwest corner of the building somewhat more to avoid the slopes. 2. The applicant is required to comply with the mitigation measures which were required by the ERC threshold determination prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The applicant shall revise the site plan to demonstrate the availability of some active or passive recreation opportunities for employees. Acceptable recreation features could include benches,picnic furniture,bicycle racks,basketball hoops and the like. The plan shall be revised and provided to the Development Services Division project manager for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide additional habitat landscaping in the interior portion of the site to address the required habitat landscaping per the City's agreement with U.S. Soil Conservation Service. The minimum amount of landscaping shall be equal to a 2%of the entire site area. The plan shall be revised and provided to the Development Services Division project manager for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall revise the site plan to indicate the location of the trash and recyclables areas. The areas must be accessible by collection vehicles, and must be screened from view per City Code. The plan shall be revised and provided to the Development Services Division project manager for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide additional raised walkways along the building at the office entrances to increase pedestrian safety. The site plan shall also be revised to incorporate landscaping or architectural features such as awnings to define areas where vendors or customers would enter the building. The plan shall be revised and provided to the Development Services Division project manager for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. The applicant shall propose additional articulation or graphics to diminish the appearance of the building bulk as seen from Monster Road. The plan shall be revised and provided to the Development Services Division project manager for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. The applicant shall record a covenant to run with the land notifying owners of their responsibility to maintain the landscaping in perpetuity. Copies of the draft covenant must be submitted to Development Services Division project manager for review and approval, and must also be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. The applicant shall screen any roof equipment per City Code requirements. Elevations of the proposed screening shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. The applicant shall be required to submit a lighting plan to the Development Services Division project manager for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 11. The applicant shall either(a)revise the site plan to provide an additional 10 parking spaces, (b)seek and successfully obtain an administrative modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance for decreased parking, or(c)decrease the size of the office or warehouse use to eliminate the need for additional parking spaces. The applicant shall provide documentation to the Development Services Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest,LLC Upper Monster Road Warehouse File No.: LUA-97-164,SA-H,V March 5, 1998 Page 11 Division project manager as to how this condition is being satisfied,prior to the issuance of a building permit. 12. The applicant shall be required to provide a sign at the intersection of the exit drives and Monster Road which warns motorists exiting the site that bicycle traffic utilizes Monster Road. The design and location of the warning signs is subject to the approval of the Development Services Division project manager and must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. ORDERED THIS 5th day of March, 1998. FRED J.KA N HEARING E R TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of March, 1998 to the parties of record: Jennifer Toth Henning Roger Pecsok Alan Bessette 200 Mill Avenue S 200 112th Avenue NE,#205 2215 N. 30th Street Renton,WA 98055 Bellevue,WA 98004 Tacoma,WA 98403 Neil Watts City of Tukwila Planning Dept. 200 Mill Avenue S Attn: Jack Pace Renton,WA 98055 6300 Southcenter Blvd,#100 Tukwila,WA 98188 TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of March, 1998 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Administrator Members,Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Art Larson,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren,City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m..March 19, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This ' request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest,LLC Upper Monster Road Warehouse File No.: LUA-97-164,SA-H,V March 5, 1998 Page 12 An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk,accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. 1 COURc ,,\,\ .9. ��\ Y/ UGH I 1 - - ., I ¢W • l (� ii 1 1 �_ i OXV / 1 /� CO. 0 1 a_,r. 11 1 �r �iT^,'ON +. ,"_O i} 9 A. 10 / ��i�� 16 I • `\' ` � ��tl u u y /' \ n' 40 :41 fy Q {{ `>A I µr[ov✓'� 'i i'/ IS __J j/J� //� �`l°: u I. iSF iY e i w YTS?�j^ i (/- � ` • 'Calt.o /I � c`t • • GRAPHIC SCALE OW• • 1 /X- O �,o2e0 ` i1 yy1 V. 19• }1 :' `T t u_—. 1 � j /,',` 7"'`.\ 20 I I �l,f— e , +". . 1,•i• f i 1'.F'p� f .., / iSe Y' //� l�.r�r 21 '\ `.- 1 �` ,r..._ '' r 6.4 ___ . . ` ' , +IT 1 -,Iii • 2,,,..... .may! t� WASH-,•R G T O N T E G Ngc / unr `uv. _ „...11 JI- I , ...gad... _:•'.*:,,,,,, • �, "'D"" '" A S H I N•.G Ty0`•371 IT E C H 't „�� MOru>f°`---, 0- l I{ \ • CENTER N T C R • II, ` fes,, ,-.--•- ----- -.r- -�'�.. CO"S--•-- - "� -( �} M 270 Acres _ r[c T,llc.c •[xrt II i'�' 'lap emALc,.c�; 14. ••`:•:. _ 1 ` - --- - __--- ,-� _ I +o .4..n / 1'• ;,`:�_:Yh___ - `Nw:➢n+l..aW_, \�!' . .ro e.1v,. \ W A S INS; 46. .:,... , 12 • • .p \ A\ i I,z T��. .— .i, -• -- . .4 �O �, LOW/PRo ( r` OAT. i1 ! 'I i 'eJ ' I e:2'�At•on �.`� T E C H N I,..:;i/f•; � , '� F 0:R T ` \ i I 1 \• T_• r; 1 t'."j,.•'• 7�Fes+O •0`` `` ,. '.. 0• ,^,,,^. ....�:..^ I0 " ?` �;77`�; 0.+1 l.1 I FORT ' 1 i 1 R �= ' ; :`- __,\_ •\fit— `� it ! .c1,\ /t r• _i T. Sa' L 1 •;j.': : D E fy'T '' a;% i nxo ". d•'?s4 '_-• �•^. [ r.[ ir , -- ice` ~ I �l F ) r `. . , :\0.01. / _\ r. ,tole .a :` 1 i " n � e0 Aao �i [ V� sty:.. \•22 .i 3 •� ,0 E`�!y TY ' .o..JP' \ � ,w .rt' 1,1•Z1 \\\ \� =r i'`•t to I '��a t�YI Gill 1 '�- • •`P.• 1 1 m• �.' I i lr 6Q, „ •' w 1•\402�} a� 4" .1' I .I :Y".�,a o2cz -Et S. /S/Sf ST m ^'y `• P,P - -_\' .. 1 i �- z TL a'a m a r YU P E T;p.a. 24 G , • \ �_ 9� �l I � Z O ' .ate•5'� , '.....[ •,"• E. . $[. 'm y, �.^.^ litia....,, i off' �1' •, i p b0/`4 ' P. 'c' I R,,:.,11-� LDRro i>F ANY`. .•. ✓, e'1'� RtJER- q4;� / _ r'/• "'�, ��IH— TEnsr� I �— I 9°P9 1 `'': T.E�SI ti � n�;P�` .,. ,�,� ► �i" i • 0 ;\ :a ,9T MDR -,� � :®C ® ' ; '�•>` 34.t [ G/la 0.,y Y iii °q W t-,..-.,:n rp.::.c.2F1;s 7 rplia ...LH, Li nu ,„,, -....., # .,--. ............„„.. '�m ..is▪Q l OF'. to�',C7' Tukwila PerY \�•. �•\ ...y..� - ;3'J�,,, 6 114 • ,,,,,,, , ---..• - N 1�T O 2t �� , .�1U // o c •li. •• r. LE)/ • [ r 1N1Stptfi • •.. II "- o O<; f �'. �I .i"_._� •".. [ � Car•I.LdB CD II} ..-97sfs./a rr` G Y'. �/ Y e • Sfl60 Aaa . .e. 1S 1'; i,.,..;= ;• , ° �, ; ` Tad _ ,,. ;^ . .�.. 0, : A E iu's::v.a. —i 1 I-:ij --_- —..+—,.. .yV_._-NBB'35�'E _ f7E36. _ _ -•T.f-.. L .[.: <� �,N In. ,AI_` .__._...__ ;t. •}., lilr�iO It.- ._ ._^n. _ .•1•I—j .�.� Y _ I [Eo9E- .... �IlIr llilll/li ''•r.'� Y. I ')� F=11 '� ::5" 1,....,,,,-„:i;..a. ' aro..a`l^I if Iiiiill(JblI r�t7/1e� :�!q0� ftwdu meT. wir .1 FAQ '. ;s_ - ciew -a;1 PROJECT INFORMATION 15,1.1...:4:..%—r1 ___.__._—_ tr1 , ��� TINNr:minmxr,IYEr• )f r -:�1' Ll��1 ;i+ - I ' r r •:[*NN5•N WOIDN,OUSTPoAI) .r'r'n,, .'_ _ _ II iii Jy '� • :•'\ '• i 0. BuKONG ' n9[•w 1 '.1;_ ur,1 T,NNG Ar+NfY if,'.. --- _' ' _ �,•%i' A __—•11=. 1I `7 op • • 4 `.' 1. J=j.i 07Y a RENTON-PLANNNG ONSW. /1"j'` *• -Y-'%; _ i I • y 1 ,, 1r• g ,�'_. 1i;;,' .Y�- .1( • .-- • WRRDO SETBACK PECIARCNENIS SUeiCT TO BR PUN REBER. OARS. %SEIDACISSLl / f'` 'l166'ST__/.!i'_ if W 1 1•�•••.,�• •• _ __ .I I � SEIBACNS NAY CcrfER MOB INDSE N EFFECT DUMB DE51CN/CCNSTNA:TON :•�'. ITL - 1111EI Or ENStNG NPROY[NENTs /,�r'"' jp6;,�'. .. .. 1- :•�. e:: _-`�.� .uN TAur - My 0.FOP CTN-73.0, I;L : 1, FRONDED: IROAI.30•. SOE•60'NM.. MIA-,AO r.{•:•.:.�.J'IE //'I,_`y'r-`�ptl\ ,_ CITY a RINia p/ `' • EMS 511E APPEARS ON NAT(NK E1000 NSURANR RAIF YAP,DATED SEAT /'J 15,:1>r•yr•�'./ ', ''1/ : vo, 1 ' •1'; I . f 16.1995.CONNUMTY PANEL N0.5303SC0976a,AND 15 5NA)C0 N ION[ f::%1 N y' '/� 5'AREA D(TERNWED 10 BC W750E IHC 500 YEAR IL00O PLAN MO ION[ 11N • - •/ 1 i. AN*1000 DEPTHS a 1 r0 3 FEET(USUALLY AREAS a POONG)BASE ''Y „f', . p..0 .''t , A 'I •j /LOCO CIEVAI19lS OEn0NN1D(19')' I•11'i1 111 E -'. T I.-.',. 1! )I y' ; RND Q�A 11;r+s1. _ } 11 1 .' -� '; WO SDp1 r 1 • BURIED 6S AND ARE SLOW A5 INDICATED CAC RECORDS IMPS TUR7977E0ENE I I I,'I i(D /,[l l {.. P 10 :� - n° ! 7 B D. ENE AND VCRVNO...CRC POSSIBLE BY RACUPCS THOULOCATED N ANC ••0,1, ;,,I !,1 1..• , Y•y.,. 'PARCEL'•A • ;1 .I ![ID. NE ASSWC TII LIABILITY TI N M ACCURACY A NOSE RECORDS. I'I' 1 .,.•1,' !i�r, �l .7.•.\ I•NDAIZRYOW IUN ..11 ''I LJ-� •!ON H rNAI LOCATION IT Cn51NG 0Tul[S N AREAS CRITICAL 10 1 ',` I 1,µ / I- .1 a51a carACT ME UTILITY o1MCP/ACENcr. t�I'11;Sw �i 5�'(;';'., )I;�1.\�,\��-�L�+ ._ � .. • - aTrANN,AHr,Aa1Arrc rrbua• �I;�(1( 6 APII.; 'TIl -- •' n~wiwRiR...• -\•, �. I' . I, A;I'.11;1 \U . 't rt.•no '-. 1 QQQQQQ ' TOTAL 511E SQUARE FOOTAGE•.309.997 SOFT (7.13 ACHES) i,1).11,T 1p1'r.1;I4I,I'_\M .•- •\ •• R flF • "1• 1 t DL e evaDwc sWME rWTACE I ly,(;�i;l,. i�� �;•1>r G. PRDoocllw sQUu,[FOOTAGE.79s63 upr .r�; ('r'•,.•Irl'I I 7:i'•r' • i i.� _ et VARCHOIrSC SPARE rW1ACt•66.103 50/7T rli l,?IJ1)?I,l; �.00/` ...- on-cc SQUARE rWi CE: 3.090 SOt77 �.()' •`\�:.1.:11y'.l'; ,I�1: 1 �•i TOTAL SOAK r00TAGGCC• 101,060 50/F1 ' .''k!1$1,c•�\. , •? - .,,; txi:•:` \. iI;`'\l b , A.2ow'a7- = i �c� L • slunD,c rWiPaNr SWAM FOOTAGE.1N,o60 soar • .• \ �,,� • I1J .,� t1 i'.1.;.•: ::I�11.,6P`.. . 111 r'r-;x'736126 SJI�r�J �LtL'�/ • KM ellm MG 107 FOKNAa N,N7NTAa• (•. 1'4; ••; F f`r I a�!i` �+ ' I! •'.''I rta a�a: • BUIONG Qi 001.06a 50/77 1...•. !; i 'i NM.: - - :''b L.eLsr L,.. 1' r PARNNG/1. U6,I16 50/!1� 1,.. ' ,1-- ;� ,... illik 7); 337,06A 50 T TOTAL IYPERNQUS SURFACE) 1;:-r' L yti �� � •' Soon mnl '�' i PROOIKOOI/NARENOUSE PAPAWS SPACES PECONED(I PER%SOO SOFT)•6A :�Vy;.�•�li' :- / :� /�_ , `1. / • l,rA r aFTCE FARADIC SPACES PECOPCD(6-A 5 PIP 1-000 S0/TTl •15-75 '••,..i4:: ,_.. ^. • 4 1+ 11� Z 1 14 rrTT� t� IOIAL PNOtNG SPREES PEONPID.>D-e1 '�l•1i1� :•� � �� ��� Ei- k �, ���; )` lll«<5 HANDICAPPED PNOUNG SPACES PCQPPID •A 'tl,"1'1'ij):it i lai7..... �r• i- :•1 ,1! , ' A $ CPIPACI(M151167 PAWNS SPACES PPONDID 5 111;II.1�,.,1.I::r.: �i fl: ��" .'`� "��,.,. rhP t7V '' ! r sTArro.PD(9'.Io')PARKING SPACES FRONDED •TOO .r I'i.l'!I'1 -: ,':_�-�-��,5}+ Y (-_.•::••_ 'Y Y . HANOIGPPt0 l9'•t0'1 PARADW SPACES PROAO0D. s(ALL VAN ACCCSS6IC) '.4i�'ll,i 1111 �riir:,L ..,f Aj:; e• .\ti q7 \y 4 AS 41 r•• Tom.PANG SPACES PROVIDED•106 !4.11I''41}::,'i 'I•'i ,11 14••.,,:4+s •. •. //— 'Iq.i.�l'It1,,.I,:,,Jj9!,iii11i1',% 6-_ /. _:T� i:::_: . ,; `\`` � � : a i / V pAPANG lDi IANDSGPu1G MARKING A'PATSlAaI' 1[�:'1''Ii I:":.c;r'1`�;, •11. /.'A•.�"... _r�:-+[::: J LANDSCAPING P[OUWED(19.]Oe'.OS)•96550/TT •'i i11• •,N^I••I,wi;;l,� ,ILA ,w�. r • �(•• �'r ' /1 J U LANOSCAPNG PROMO,•0.90O SO/Fr i111•'',1' .1''-.)'•t%1 T/•., �P' .'•.,'~ 4 •:..1:1�1>,1[�.I'ts}��'i��1��'•` ' ;) ��•;v'�y \ 49 • '1 / 10 -I S 1'.i1IljiiiW.!' :,lT.1t. I•..ir/ .: (1.O,••_ m a-Cr i :11.111,,11i!iill" ll\;1}. 1'I;:•T. \ \�:. 4 �' /I.A .NA 3 < .3 i 1',61r4u 1 .\\Ii'1 .'•10 ..,y. •• .. .1 .\•.\ �`/� ,\' •�a /- ;/•r• wlnr i -a�L 1 • is • `; •/ o • rC.' .; . y .i' METRO :•, T• f,1.. lI 1 A fto 6.N. r•.9 •'}� �i:,:i•I11 ' A / 0 r • •. t11!AT `.J: / •.r/' F+ srr� \'w ka, A % Al tl JAO R .•q SW \•..•7 W•••M•. • : t I ` I tJ • •M INC)I.I.4:0"!•'till alagIN! I< 0 rl 1-1 U 1 ``` _LY - r KI I-1 P-1 O iJ • •M 0 iV011b'/"!'•t! hi.LT1cols 1 1 !ONO U � smos- a , - REN I-_-_ __ U -AI u .. • O !J • •M if..40=DI4.47.••••l1111 .t.vsrn U )1111 , -1‘ . .1 la 1-ff- r.-'- -----1 —pcm-- 3q e F fVOI.Lb'/\EMU! i ii1iFOrl •inn o<► _'zr I — —_---- aaw v I;IN X=''''.-.==• coir.....1.—,, t s° co ‘ ..J uooa 1•=A a Tl�HJl + T�'�I1�LL a Ay I zA � `]IfJ rn• •caa ND.ML� � l A> •to AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION&PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 The Environmental e m n CommitteeofoNon- Significance gt (ERC)has issued a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal Municipal Code. newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF Proposal to develop a warehouse and continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County office facility. Project requires environmen- Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the tal review and public hearing to consider ton for KingCounty. o site plan. Location: 1200 block of State of Washington Y Monster Rd.SW. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County The 15 day comment and appeal period Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers for this project will run concurrently. The periods for this project will during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a end at 5:00 PM on February 9, 1998. Written comments shall be forwarded to LUA-97-164, SA-H, ECT the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures as published on: 1/26/98 imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$60.10 Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Legal Number 4149 Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235- Le g 2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office,First Floor,Municipal Building A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing m Legal Clerk S h Coun Journal meeting in the Cou CityExai Hatall,hisnregular the second floor ofiner Hall, Renton, Washington, on February 17, 1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval. If the Subscribed and sworn before me on this - dayof ` ' Environmental Determination is appealed, 19 the appeal will be heard as part of this pub- lic hearing. Interested parties are invited to c attend the public hearing. /� Published in the South County Journal l C �fl ! � � January 26, 1998.4149 Notary Public of the State of Washington residing in Renton King County, Washington AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the NOTICE ENVIRO SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL DETERMINATION F &PUBLICENTAL EARII• i. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMIT•LE 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee a dailynewspaper seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a le al (ERC)has issued i Determination of wNon- publishedg Significance - Mitigated for the following newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months project under the authority of the Renton prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language UPPERER al Code. UPP MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County LUA-97-164,SA-H,V-H,ECF Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the Proposal to develop a warehouse and State of Washington for King County. office facilit . Project requires environmen- tal review, andyaring to consider The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County the site plan and variance from the Land Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance. Location:1200 block of Monster Rd.SW. during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The LUA-97 SA-H, V-H, ECF comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on February 9, 1998. Written comments shall be forwarded to as published on: 1/26/98 the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$60.10 imposed by the City of Renton's Legal Number 4147 Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235- 2550. Appeal procedures are available in fr4ctjoumai the City Clerk's office, First Floor,Municipal Legal Clerk, Building. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular ‘'D-\\4 meeting in the Council Chambers on the Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of -, 19 q - second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on February 17, 1998 at 9:00 may{[ AM to consider the Site Approval. If the ``�ttt I f j t f��� ( n / � — the Environmental al Determination is appealed,p `�\\ N F����� \J/�'//1' p/ the appeal will be heard as part of this pub �� F� �i �'l. r1�/1 lic hearing. Interested parties are invited to � ,••;�S010.1 4 , / ,, attend the public hearing. ;Z��:o�.�`�'' %•-' Notary Public of the State of Washington Published in the South County Journal R• 4 t\�7ARy mod. January 26, 1998.4147 residing in Renton —0— 'H= King County, Washington CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the ift5 day of "FebrLLaK4 , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Qeport ko -tkt deariI 5 Ico..W tber documents. This information was sent to: Name �" Representing Pcler PGcSOIL Opus 1ortVAuet F3a0,4 G. 1:4gort V SSocASteS lack, Pact. CZti 4CTIA,kwita. (Signature of Sender) SU► ►a %L. Scer- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that d/u� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fo`r'the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated ` .LL.. I I J`lC/R knC� a vlyl Notary Publi in and for the State of, ashington Notary (Print) My appointment e COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 Project Na,ne: fi . IManS'ttr Road. Wavelimise.. Project Number: LVta% uog $P►� NOTARY.DOC • Thapp I n h�..8 . .ItCst on s ilistedar`en..l�r. e....vf..a i�a€�orMnu[r1be�.o.. or1d..nQt..neresS.Ertl::::th.�::orde�.:lrt.:wlt�ctl.:. • IMP �..) �iy #Y :.�::::5!:::: :. . .................... pe ca 1 far h�sann atthydscr. Lion afi'th.�Hearn Fxgttlr��t`� ..... :.::::::::::::: PROJECT NAME: Transmission Line Upgrade PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-196,CU-H,V-H • PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, seeks a conditional use permit and a height variance to upgrade/replace an existing transmission line. The existing 115 kV single circuit line will be replaced with a 230 KV double circuit line. The new steel towers will have an average height of 103 feet. The variance, if approved, will allow the applicant to exceed the height limit for buildings in this area. Location: Vicinity of Puget Drive South, Edmonds Way SE and South 11th Street. • • PROJECT NAME: Upper Monster Road Warehouse PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-164,SA-H,V-H,ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to develop a 111,270 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four(4) on-grade truck doors. The applicant has also submitted an alternate site plan to be considered under this application. A potential end user has been identified, and their space requirements are less than the proposal. Therefore, the applicant is requesting review of a 101,068 square foot building. Of this 29,965 square feet would be use for production, 66,103 square feet would be used as warehouse, and 5,000 square feet would be used for office. A total of 108 parking spaces are proposed. Landscaped areas would total 3,900 square feet. Location: 1200 block of Monster Road SW. • AGNDA.DOC , 1 City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: February 17, 1998 Project Name: Upper Monster Road Warehouse Applicant/ Roger Pecsok Address: Opus Northwest, LLC 200 112th Avenue, NE, Suite 205 1 Bellevue, WA 98004 Owner/ B &G Renton Associates • Address: 2825 Eastlake Avenue East, Suite 115 Seattle, WA 98102 File Number: LUA-097-164,SA-H, V, ECF Project Manager: JenniferToth Henning • Project Description: The applicant proposes to develop a 111,270 square foot warehouse and office • facility on a 7.11 acre site. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four(4) on-grade truck doors. 1 The applicant has also submitted an alternate site plan to be considered under this application. A potential end user has been identified, and their space requirements are less than for the proposal. Therefore, the applicant is also requesting review of a 101,068 square foot building. Of this, 29,965 square feet would be used for production, 66,103 square feet would be used as warehouse, and 5,000 square feet would be used for office. A total of 108 parking spaces, 1 on-grade truck door, and 17 dock-high truck doors are proposed. In addition to Site Plan Review, the proposed project and alternate require a variance from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance (Code Section 4-9) to clear areas where the slope is in excess of 40%. Project Location: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW w•,;;;, �' IN"\ •`•'=-,,. ,,."�' � . Can I i in .7:---:----------\ ,*';,:,,V. I '•' "'•"-,,---"'RC I . - ,;,, y Xj. toll\'\k5 `: f�' P 1,-4--- - .. ,•'. .. :-',3 . a , At '? gip •: caWrRo \ j!•,........1I ., \ '= P I a ; ,‘'�'n I I • i1.�•s 1 ..,`�i • '�I , 1 ND • " `-.1•,1`1�\ ilp 'I�t• ... I y1l'1 �,,,, :: p\`vim V•1_ -- } IL - ).,�.a��"-'�+ i.r`-.,�Yam',, �m , ��'. fin ' ' • •'7_ .0.. lea.� , :11• y ""' (� /, ' 1 t' City of Renton P/B/PW Departmen. Preliminary Report to the Heating Examiner UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164, SA-H,V,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998 Page 2 of 17 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record:: B & G Renton Associates 2825 Eastlake Avenue East, Suite 115 Seattle, WA 98102 2. Zoning Designation: Medium Industrial (IM) 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Employment Area-Valley (EAV) Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: Vacant 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Industrial (Sid Elund, Container Corp, Plumbers and Pipefitters, Renton Concrete Recylcers) East: Industrial - Metro Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant South: Vacant Metro property West: Vacant site designated for medium industrial and proposed for warehouse/production 6. Access: from Monster Road SW 7. Site Area: 7.11 acres 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: N/A New Building Area: 111,270 s.f. Option 1 or 101,068 s.f. Option 2 Total Building Area: 111,270 s.f. Option 1 or 101,270 s.f. Option 2 C. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation Ord.4086 9/21/87 Interim Zoning Code N/A Ord.4404 6/7/93 Adoption Draft Comp Plan and N/A Ord.4405 6/7/93 Area-Wide Land Use and Zoning Map Adoption Comp Plan,Map and N/A Ord. 4496 2/20/95 Area-Wide Zoning Map Adoption Comp Plan N/A Ord. 4627 2/19/96 Amendment HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Depan`meni Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164, SA-H,V,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998 Page 3 of 17 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: Water: 12-inch water main in Monster Road, 12-inch water main in easement on site. Sewer: 12-inch sanitary sewer line in Monster Road (north of the site) and Metro lines south of the site crossing Monster Road. Surface Water/Storm Water: Regional stormwater facilities(Plumbers and Pipefitters) north of the site. 2. Fire Protection: per City of Renton Fire Department 3. Transit: Not Applicable to proposed use 4. Schools: Not Applicable 5. Recreation: Bicycle lane within one-quarter mile of site. 6. Other: Not applicable. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance: Section 4-8 2. Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance: Section 4-9 3. Zoning Code: Medium Industrial Zone: Section 4-31-11.2 4. Parking and Loading Ordinance: Section 4-14 5. Sign Code: Section 4-20 F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Employment Area: Employment Area-Valley Objective LU-EE.a: Provide for a mix of employment-based uses, including commercial, office and industrial development to support the economic development of the City of Renton. Policy LU-212.1 Develop the Renton Valley and the Black River Valley areas as a place for a range and variety of commercial, office, and industrial uses. Policy LU-212.2 Compatible and related land uses should be encouraged to locate in proximity to one another. Policy LU-212.8 Recognize viable existing and new industrial uses in the Valley, while promoting the gradual transition of uses on sites with good access and visibility to more intensive commercial and office use. HEXRPT.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department-- Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164, SA-H,V,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998 Page 4 of 17 Policy LU-212.24 Site plan review should be required for all new projects in the Renton Valley and Black River areas pursuant to thresholds established in the City's development regulations. Employment Area-Site Design Policy LU-162. On-site open space and recreational facilities in developments should be required. 2. Community Design: Streetscape Policy LU-291. Beautification and screening of parking lots should be encouraged through appropriate landscaping, fencing and berms. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant proposes to develop an approximate 111,000 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The building footprint would be approximately 106,000 square feet in size. Four two- story office areas, each 2,400 square feet (1,200 s.f. on each level) would be located generally at the four building corners. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four (4) on-grade truck doors. Impervious surface would occupy 77% of the site when developed. The applicant has also submitted an alternate site plan to be considered under this application. A potential end user has been identified, and their space requirements are less than for the proposal. Therefore, the applicant is requesting review of a 101,068 square foot building. Of this, 29,965 square feet would be used for production, 66,103 square feet would be used as warehouse, and 5,000 square feet would be used for office. A total of 108 parking spaces, 1 on-grade truck door, and 17 dock-high truck doors are proposed. Landscaped areas would total 3,900 square feet. Development would result in 77% of the site being covered with impervious surfaces. In addition to Site Plan Review, the proposed project and alternate a variance from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance (Code Section 4-9)to clear areas where the slope is in excess of 40%. Geotechnical engineering and abandoned mine assessment studies (prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. and Golder Associates, Inc.) state that previous mining for coal occurred on the western portion of the site. The studies describe construction techniques including deep dynamic compaction (DDC) to consolidate soils and compact undocumented mine workings in areas of known or suspected coal mine features. As an alternative overexcavation and traditional compaction techniques are noted. The ERC in issuing a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated stated that if deep dynamic compaction is proposed as a construction technique for this site, then separate environmental review of that construction technique would be required. The applicant has provided information stating that approximately the cut volume for the Upper Monster Road site would be 47,805 cubic yards, the amount of fill material would be 42,373 cubic yards; and 11,112 c.y. of material would be stripped. Cut and fill on the site would be balanced except for approximately 5,000 cubic yards of the topsoil layer which would be exported. Balancing would be achieved by raising the finished floor elevation of the building to 76 feet. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on January 20, 1998, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated. HEXRPT.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164, SA-H,V,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998 Page 5 of 17 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES Mitigation Measures: 1. a) The applicant shall follow the general recommendations of the geotechnical engineering report as prepared for the subject parcel(titled: Geotechnical Engineering Study and Abandoned Mine Assessment North 405 Upper and Lower Sites, Renton, Washington)by Terra Associates, Inc. (dated December 17, 1997). b) If deep dynamic compaction is approved as a construction method for the site, then separate environmental review shall be required. In addition, additional studies and more extensive public notification will be required. Compliance: The applicant is aware that they will need to follow the recommendations of the special geotechnical studies submitted. Furthermore, the applicant is aware that should they decided to propose the use of deep dynamic compaction, additional environmental review, including special studies, and more extensive public notification would be required. No appeals of these conditions were filed, and the applicant intends to comply with these measures. Mitigation Measures: 2. a) In order to mitigate potential impacts to the local and regional roadway network, construction hauling should be limited to off-peak hours of 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. b) The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee, at a rate of$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. Compliance: The applicant intends to comply with these measures. Mitigation Measure: 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee, equal to $0.52 per square foot for new construction. The fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Compliance: The applicant intends to comply with this measure. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various City departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-31-33 (D.) "The Hearing Examiner and City staff shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to discourage creativity and innovation. The site plan review criteria include, but are not limited to, the following:" HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164, SA-H,V,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998 Page 6 of 17 (5A) GENERAL CRITERIA: (1) Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements 8 policies Several objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan support the proposal to develop a warehouse/office building in areas designated Employment Area - Valley. Objective LU-EE.a encourages a mix of employment-based uses including commercial, office and industrial development. Policy LU-212.1 recognizes a range and variety of uses including office and industrial land uses. Policy LU-212.2 encourages compatible and related land uses to locate in proximity to one another. The proposal would be industrial in character and would blend in with the industrial uses located to the north (concrete recycling) and east(Metro wastewater treatment facility). Policy LU-212.8 states that viable existing and new industrial uses should be recognized in the Valley, even while the City promotes the gradual transition of uses on sites with good access and visibility to more intensive commercial and office use. The proposal would appropriately develop this site with a use that fits in with the surrounding industrial character. The site's does not have the visibility and access usually sought for more intensive commercial and office uses, and the underlying zoning for industrial use is in keeping with the proposal. Policy LU-212.24 recommends that site plan review be undertaken for new projects in the Valley. The proposal is subject to that review and a public hearing with the City's Hearing Examiner. And, Policy LU-162 suggests that on-site recreational facilities should be required in developments. The applicant's site plan does not show any recreation areas, however, the City will be requiring the construction of that portion of the bicycle lane along the Monster Road frontage on the east side of the property. Furthermore, staff will recommend as a condition of approval, that the applicant demonstrate the availability of some active or passive recreation opportunities for employees. Policy LU-291 encourages beautification and screening of parking lots through appropriate landscaping, fencing and berms. The landscape plan provided with the proposal shows that shrubs and trees are proposed along Monster Road, and that tree and landscape islands would be provided within the parking lot. The majority of the site slopes on the south and north would be seeded with an erosion control mixture. Staff will recommend as a condition of site plan approval that some additional landscaping be provided to address the Code required habitat landscaping per the City's agreement with the US Soil Conservation Service. (2) Conformance with Existing Land Use Regulations The following requirements and development standards contained in Section 4-31-11.2, (IM Zone) of the Zoning Code adopted June, 1993 are applicable to this proposal: Setbacks: The proposal is required to meet a minimum 15 foot setback from the front or street, unless the street is an arterial. Monster Road is not considered to be an arterial in the project vicinity, therefore, the applicable setback would be 15 feet. No rear or side yard setbacks are required in the IM Zone. Landscaping: All portions of the site not covered by buildings, structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas shall be maintained as permeable areas. The proposal for a building of either 111,000 square feet or 101,000 square feet and associated parking and circulation areas would result in new impervious surface. However, areas not needed for vehicle maneuvering or circulation would be landscaped. Green River Valley Landscaping: In the Green River Valley, an "additional 2% of natural landscaping must be provided per the City's agreement with the US Soil Conservation Service. HEXRPT.DOC • • City of Renton P/BJPW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164,SA-H,V,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998 Page 7 of 17 Garbage/Recycling Areas: All dumpsters and recycling areas must be screened by either fencing, landscaping or a combination thereof. Neither of the alternatives submitted by the applicant address the location or screening of dumpsters. Staff will recommend that the applicant revise the site plan to demonstrate that this standard is being met as a condition of site plan approval. (3) Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The subject property is located on the north side of an existing knoll. Proposed development would occur downslope from that prominent landform and would be approximately 27 feet in height. Neither the height nor bulk of the structure would be out of character with development or uses in the surrounding area. Landscaping is proposed along the site frontage in order to buffer the building from the street. (4) Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The site is irregularly shaped and has steep slopes and coal mine features. Design of the building and site plan has been accomplished to locate the majority of the building bulk in the flat portion of the site, on the east, and to pull away from the slopes on the north and south. Both options being considered separate the building into two apparent modules, rather than one large box, which helps to diminish the bulk of the structure. In addition, the larger option include four office bays generally located at the four corners of the building, further breaking up the mass. Large areas are devoted to vehicle circulation, which is anticipated to be truck traffic. Landscaping is concentrated around the periphery of the site, with the majority of the area that is not used as building or paved to be hydroseeded with an erosion control mix. (5) Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposal would not detract from area property values, and would result in the installation of improvements and the reclamation of a site that has previously had mineral extraction activity. (6) Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; Two driveways would provide for vehicle access from Monster Road. Once on-site vehicles would utilize parking stalls around the perimeter of the site, or access the dock-high or on-grade doors on the north, west, and south building facades. All of the dock-high doors have the required 100-feet of clear maneuvering area in front of the door; while the on-grade doors have the required minimum 45-foot clear area. For the 111,000 square foot building, a parking would be provided near the building office entrances on the south and north facades, with raised walkways leading to building entrances. For the smaller building option, parking would be concentrated in the southeast portion of the site, near the south driveway, and closest to the office area. Either option provides parking and maneuvering areas for vehicles, but additional attention to the pedestrian should be given. Staff will recommend that the applicant provide additional raised walkways along the building at the office entrances. Further, staff will recommend that the entrance areas be landscaped or that building features such as awnings be provided to call attention to the entry areas. (7) Provision of adequate light and air; Both options would result in the construction of a building greater than 100,000 square feet in size. The structure would result in shade being cast to the north during the afternoon hours. The existing knoll to the south currently blocks sunlight in the same manner. Airflow would not be disrupted or channeled in an extraordinary manner. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164,SA-H,V,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998 Page 8 of 17 (8) Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The applicant has identified a potential end user, Cascade Air Gas, for the smaller building option. This proposal would result in the separation of uses within the structure to office, warehouse and production. A tank farm would also be located outside along the south wall of the building. The tank farm would be separated from truck maneuvering areas and from parking areas utilized by office workers and pedestrians. Storage of any toxic or hazardous materials would be strictly regulated by the Renton Fire Department. The proposal for the larger building is speculative and no end user has been identified. It is not known whether the operation of either building would generate noise, odor or other harmful or unhealthy conditions. The site is separated from residential areas and concentrations of office, commercial and hotel uses, and is surrounded by other medium and heavy industrial uses. Any noise that would be generated as part of the operation would be expected to be similar to noise that is generated in the immediate vicinity. Odors and other harmful conditions would not be expected to impact the surrounding uses. (9) Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and The site is served by 12-inch water main in Monster Road and a 12-inch water main exists in an easement located at the northeast corner of the site. A new water main would need to be constructed. The site previously participated in negotiations to utilize the regional stormwater system (Plumbers and Pipefitters). The applicant will also be required to meet the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. A new wastewater main and manholes with a connection to the Metro system would be required. City of Renton Police and Fire Prevention would serve the proposed development. (10) Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. Construction and operation of the proposal would reclaim and develop a vacant site formally used for extracting coal. This would not result in neighborhood deterioration or blight, rather, the character of the area would likely be enhanced through the installation of the structure, landscaping and improvements. (5B) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES: (1) Mitigation of undesirable impacts of proposed structures and site layouts that could impair the use or enjoyment or potential use of surrounding uses and structures and of the community. The site is constrained by steep slopes and an irregular shape. The proposed site layout features two points of ingress/egress, and one large structure that tapers to fit the irregular site. Building bulk would be oriented east/west and the longest facade would be broken with modulation. Users of the Monster Road bicycle trail extension would be aware of the dominant building bulk, and the applicant has proposed landscaping to diminish the visual impacts. No off- site areas would be impaired by the site design as proposed. (2) Mitigation of undesirable impacts when an overscale structure, in terms of size, bulk, height, and intensity, or site layout is permitted that violates the spirit and/or intent of the zoning code and impairs the use, enjoyment or potential use of surrounding properties. The proposed option for the larger (111,000 s.f.) building's east elevation facing Monster Road would have minimal fenestration, with four window openings and three door openings on the approximate 300 foot run. The smaller (101,000 s.f.) building option would have two door HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164, SA-H,V,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998 Page 9 of 17 openings in a 250 lineal foot run along the eastern Monster Road facade. A bicycle lane will be added to Monster Road in this area, and the building bulk adjacent to the street would be dominant. Landscaping is shown to be installed between the structure and the road, diminishing the visual effect, however, staff will recommend that some articulation or accent be introduced to diminish the building bulk as seen from Monster Road. (3) Provision of a desirable transition and linkage between uses and to the street, utility, walkway, and trail systems in the surrounding area by the arrangement of landscaping, fencing and/or other buffering techniques, in order to prevent conflicts and to promote coordinated and planned benefit from, and access to,such elements. The applicant has provided a landscaping plan that provides a transition from the 28-foot high structure to Monster Road. Trees, shrubs, and groundcover are proposed in an approximate 35 to 50-foot wide planting bed. Twenty feet of the planting bed width would be located entirely on the project site, while the other 15 to 30-feet in width would be located within the public right-of- way. The owner of the property would be responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping within the right-of-way area. Staff will recommend as a condition of approval that the applicant be required to record a covenant to run with the land notifying owners of their responsibility to maintain the landscaping in perpetuity. (4) Consideration of placement and scale of proposed structures in relation to the natural characteristics of a site in order to avoid over-concentration of structures on a particular portion of a site such that they create a perception of greater height or bulk than intended under the spirit of the zoning code. The design of the site addresses the irregular parcel shape and the natural site constraints including steep slopes and location at the base of a hill. The bulk of the structure is located at the broadest part of the site, however, it would have a dominant appearance as viewed from Monster Road. The applicant has proposed landscaping in an approximate 35 to 50-foot wide bed as a transition between the building and the street. (5) Effective location, design and screening of parking and service areas in order to promote efficient function of such facilities, to provide integrated facilities between uses when beneficial, to promote "campus-like" or "park-like" layouts in appropriate zones, and to prevent unnecessary repetition and conflict between uses and service areas or facilities. Parking and service areas would be located with appropriate separations to promote vehicular circulation and maneuvering near dock doors, and to provide access to assigned office areas and building entrances. Staff will recommend that additional raised walkways be provided at building entrances, and architectural treatments such as awnings to define areas where vendors or customers would enter. (6) Mitigation of the unnecessary and avoidable impacts of new construction on views from existing buildings and future developable sites, recognizing the public benefit and desirability of maintaining visual accessibility to attractive natural features and of promoting "campus-like"or"park-like"settings in appropriate zones. The existing knoll on the south boundary of the site would block views from and to the south. It would also serve as a backdrop against which the proposed development would be viewed from the north. Views from other off-site areas would not be adversely affected, with the exception of views from the proposed bicycle lane. Additional articulation of the facade, or the introduction of some other architectural design feature such as paint or texture would help to diminish the dominance of the building as seen from the bicycle trail. Staff has previously suggested this as a condition of approval. HEXRPT.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Heating Examiner UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164, SA-H,V,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998 Page 10 of 17 (7) Provision of effective screening from public streets and residential uses for all permitted outdoor storage areas(except auto and truck sales), for surface mounted utility equipment, for rooftop equipment, and for all refuse and garbage containers, in order to promote a "campus-like" or "park-like" setting where appropriate and to preserve the effect and intent of screening or buffering otherwise required by the zoning code. The applicant will need to identify the location of the garbage and recyclables areas on the site and provide effective screening and access. Staff will recommend that these areas be identified and designed in accordance with Code and be submitted to the Development Services staff prior to the issuance of building permits. No roof equipment is shown, however, if it is included, appropriate screening will be required. Staff will recommend that the applicant be required to submit plans showing proposed screening of roof-mounted equipment prior to the issuance of building permits. (8) Consideration of placement and design of exterior lighting in order to avoid excessive brightness or glare to adjacent properties and streets. Staff will recommend that a lighting plan be submitted for approval prior to the building permits. (5C) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF A PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE: (1) Building placement and spacing to provide for privacy and noise reduction; orientation to views and vistas and to site amenities, to sunlight and prevailing winds, and to pedestrian and vehicle needs. Only one structure is proposed on the site. The building is oriented to meet the space requirements of the applicant while addressing the constraints of the size, shape, and natural and man-made features of the site including topography and coal mining activity. The site is being developed for function of the industrial use. Orientation of the structure with the bulk of the building facing east/west, and tapering from east to west would help to buffer the use from the adjacent street. (2) Consideration of placement and scale of proposed structures in relation to the openness and natural characteristics of a site in order to avoid over-concentration or the impression of oversized structures. Slopes would be reconfigured and retained with rockeries in order to carve out an appropriate building pad and vehicle circulation/parking area. An erosion control planting mix would be hydroseeded on the worked slopes to re-establish a natural character. The structure would be large in response to the proposed use as warehouse and market demands. The proposal is not unusual for this type of use, and would not be considered to be oversized in relation to the openness or natural characteristics of the site. (3) Preservation of the desirable natural landscape through retention of existing vegetation and limited soil removal, insofar as the natural characteristics will enhance the proposed development. The most notable natural feature in the area is the knoll on the south side of the site, that creates a backdrop for the proposed structure. The lower slopes of the knoll would be graded and revegetated with an erosion-control grass mix. The most prominent portion of this feature, the top of the knoll,would not be disturbed, as it is located on the adjacent parcel. (4) Use of existing topography to reduce undue cutting, filling and retaining walls in order to prevent erosion and unnecessary storm water runoff, and to preserve stable natural slopes and desirable natural vegetation. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164,SA-H,V,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998 Page 11 of 17 Development is proposed on the flatter portion of the site. Grading will be accomplished to balance cut and fill on the site. The applicant has proposed to raise the finish floor elevation of the structure to balance site grading. Retaining walls will be installed on the site to retain existing slopes that would be regraded to accommodate the proposal. A retaining wall on the western portion of the site is shown in an area where a city utility easement exists for a water line. The location of that wall would need to be revised as no structures can be constructed in the easement. (5) Limitation of paved or impervious surfaces, where feasible, to reduce runoff and increase natural infiltration. Due to the type of warehouse use envisioned and the roof, parking and maneuvering areas, approximately 77% of the site would be covered with impervious surface (same % for both building options). The remainder of the site would be landscaped. (6) Design and protection of planting areas so that they are not susceptible to damage from vehicles or pedestrian movements. The majority of landscaping would be located within a 35 to 50-wide planting area between Monster Road the and building. Site slopes that are disturbed would be replanted with an erosion control mix. Limited raised planting islands would be provided in the parking areas and would not be susceptible to damage by vehicles or pedestrians. In addition, the applicant is proposing hardy northwest ornamental landscaping for the site. (7) Consideration of building form and placement and landscaping to enhance year- round conditions of sun and shade both on-site and on adjacent properties and to promote energy conservation. Proposed landscaping would not be impacted by excessive sun or lack of sun. The majority of the proposed landscaping would be located in an approximate 35- to 50-foot wide strip between Monster Road and the proposed building. (5D) CIRCULATION AND ACCESS: (1) Provision of adequate and safe vehicular access to and from all properties. Two access points to Monster Road are proposed, one at the northeast corner of the site and another at the southeast corner of the site. Site distance concerns for the southeastern approach have been expressed by staff in meetings reviewing the proposal. Staff will recommend that the applicant be required to provide a sign warning motorists existing the site that bicycle traffic utilizes Monster Road. A letter received from King County Metro WasteWater Division notes concerns with road lane width and horizontal and vertical curves. The roadway currently meets City standards and would not need to be revised. However, street improvements will be needed on Monster Road, including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, lighting and provision of a 5-foot bicycle lane. (2) Arrangement of the circulation pattern so that all ingress and egress movements may occur at as few points as possible along the public street, the points being capable of channelization for turning movements. Two access points are identified with a minimum separation of 500 feet. No channelization is proposed or required by the City. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department - Preliminary Report to the Heating Examiner UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164, SA-H,V,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998 Page 12 of 17 (3) Consolidation of access points with adjacent properties, when feasible. No opportunity for consolidation of access points with adjacent properties exists. (4) Coordination of access points on a superb/ock basis so that vehicle conflicts and vehicle/pedestrian conflicts are minimized. Not applicable. (5) Orientation of access points to side streets or frontage streets rather than directly onto arterial street, when feasible. Monster Road is not an arterial street in this area. The proposal complies with this criteria. (6) Promotion of the safety and efficiency of the internal circulation system, including the location, design and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian access points, drives, parking, turnarounds, walkways, bikeways, and emergency access ways. The site is designed to accommodate vehicles including cars, trucks and semi-trucks. Vehicles would have adequate turning and maneuvering areas as required by City Code. No bicycle parking is indicated, however, staff will recommend as a condition of approval, that bicycle parking be provided for. The larger structure (111,000 s.f.) would provide parking for 87 vehicles. Warehouse use would take up about 101,000 square feet, while office use would occupy about 9,600 square feet. The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires one parking space for each 1,500 square feet of warehouse. In this case, 67.6 parking spaces would be required. The office use is required to have a minimum of 3 parking spaces per 1,000 gsf of office or a maximum of 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 gsf of office. For the larger building, a minimum of 28.8 or a maximum of 43.2 parking spaces would be needed. The total required parking for the proposal would be a minimum of 96.4 spaces or a maximum of 110.8 spaces. Since the applicant is proposing 87 parking spaces, they would need to either: 1) provide an additional 10 parking spaces; or, 2) seek a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance; or 3) decrease the size of the office or warehouse use to eliminate the need for additional parking spaces. The smaller building (101,000 s.f.)would provide parking to 108 vehicles. The office component (5,000 s.f.) would require a minimum of 15 parking spaces and a maximum of 22.5 spaces (3/1,000 gsf minimum to 4.5/1,000 gsf maximum). The remaining warehouse use (approximately 66,000 s.f.) would requies 44 parking spaces (1:1,500 s.f.) and the production area would require 30 minimum to 45 maximum parking spaces (1/1,000 gsf minimum to 1.5/1,000 gsf maximum). The total required parking for the smaller building would be 89 minimum to 111 maximum. As proposed,the parking complies. (7) Separation of loading and delivery areas from parking and pedestrian areas. Dock-high and on-grade doors are provided on for on the north west and south facades, with adequate room for maneuvering and clearance from pedestrian and car parking areas. (8) Provisions for transit and carpool facilities and access where appropriate. No separate transit or carpool facilities are indicated, but could be incorporated into proposed parking. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164, SA-H,V,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998 Page 13 of 17 (9) Provision for safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking areas, buildings,public sidewalks and adjacent properties. As previously mentioned, staff will recommend that additional raised walkways and other identifying features such as landscaping or entry awnings be incorporated into the design so that pedestrians can easily locate entry areas and select a clear and safe route to access this area. (5E) SIGNAGE: (1) Employment of signs primarily for the purpose of identification. The site plan shows two sign locations, one at each entry/exit drive. The signs are shown to be located in the public right-of-way. These would need to be relocated out of the public right-of- way in compliance with the Sign Code (Section 4-20). No signs are allowed in the public right-of- way or within 20-feet of intersections or driveways which shall obscure vision between the height of three feet and ten feet of the street or driveway grade. 2) Management of sign elements, such as size, location and arrangement so that signs complement the visual character of the surrounding area and appear in proportion to the building and site to which they pertain. The applicant will need to submit a sign plan and application for sign permits in compliance with the Sign Code. (3) Limitation of the number of signs to avoid visual clutter and distraction. Two signs are proposed. The Sign Code limits the applicant to one sign per business for each street frontage of any of one of the following: freestanding, roof, ground, projecting or combination. Walls signs are permitted. The applicant would need to submit an accurate sign plan in compliance with the Code and obtain a sign permit at such time that an end uses is identified. (4) Moderation of surface brightness or lighting intensity except for that necessary for sign visibility. Not applicable. (5) Provision of an identification system to allow for quick location of buildings and addresses(Ord. 3981,4-7-86). The building address could be painted on the east building facade or incorporated into a sign at either or both of the entrance/exit drives. (5F) HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT AND STORAGE FACILITIES: (a) Above-ground hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities shall be constructed with containment controls which will prevent the escape of hazardous wastes in the event of an accidental release from the facility. Such controls shall conform with all adopted Federal, State and local design and construction standards. One of the potential end-users is Cascade Air Gas. Any storage or disposal of hazardous materials would need to be accomplished in compliance with federal, state and city standards. A tank farm is shown on the site plan for the smaller building option. It would be located away from the proposed office area, and would be in close proximity to the production area. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/8/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164,SA-H,V,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998 Page 14 of 17 (b) Underground hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities shall comply with Chapter 2 of Title VII, the Underground Storage Tank Ordinance. Not applicable. (c) Hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities shall comply with article 80 of the Uniform Fire Code as adopted by ordinance by the City of Renton. The applicant will need to coordinate with Renton Fire Department if any hazardous waste is to be treated or stored on-site. (d) A hazardous waste spill contingency plan for immediate implementation in the event of a release of hazardous wastes at the facility shall be reviewed and approved by the Renton Fire Department prior to issuance of any permits. The applicant will need to develop this plan as appropriate, by coordinating with the Renton Fire Department. (e) The location of all on-site and off-site facilities must comply with the State Siting Criteria as adopted in accordance with RCW 70.105.210(Ord. 4186, 11-14-88). The applicant will need to comply with this provision if applicable. 6. CONSISTENCY WITH VARIANCE CRITERIA: The applicant proposes to remove vegetation on a steep slope (areas greater than 40%) in order to permit the construction of flat building pad area for the proposed structure. Application is being made for a variance from Code Section 4-9-10:C in order to cut trees and clear land in steep slope areas. City Code Section 4-31-19 F. states that the Hearing Examiner has authority to grant a variance upon making a determination, in writing, that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The applicant states that large warehouse projects, such as the one proposed, require a relatively flat site. Large buildings and truck maneuvering areas require that only very minor grades are present. The topography of the subject site includes a hillside on the west side of the property which acts as a barrier between the proposed development and the existing regional detention facility to the West. The area represents a very small portion of the site, and is where slopes are in excess of 40%. This area would need to cleared so that grading may take place. Grading is planned for the construction of the parking areas and of a biofiltration swale for runoff from the site's parking area which would then be conveyed to the west. The location and shape of the steep slopes would provide an irregular grading area which would make a very large portion of the site unusable, and therefore the project much less practical, if it is not graded and left as is. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Heating Examiner UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164, SA-H,V,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998 Page 15 of 17 b. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The applicant has stated that the construction of the facility would not damage the public welfare or injure the property or improvements in the vicinity. Clearing would be immediately followed by grading to stabilize the area. During the grading portion of the work, an engineered and approved temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan would be in effect. A geotechnical report has been prepared by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer for this project. Staff will recommend that the applicant be required to revegetate areas disturbed as a result of clearing and grading activity. c. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: The applicant states that the granting of the variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege in that the grading of this area is necessary for the development of the site. The type of project proposed, which is consistent with the existing zoning, typically needs a very large are of flat and level land due to the building size and required truck maneuvering areas. It is very difficult to find a parcel of land remaining in this area, at this size, and under this zoning that does not have at least some areas of steep slopes. d. That the approval as determined by the Reviewing Official is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: The applicant states that the variance requested is a minimum variance in that the location of the steep slopes is at the edge of the proposed grading area. Some slopes resulting form the proposed work will still be in excess of 40%, but will be part of the engineered site plan. The slopes further to the west, on the adjacent Lower Monster Road site, would not be affected. H. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Site Plan Review Staff recommends approval of either of the two options presented for the Upper Monster Road Warehouse, Project File No. LUA-97-164, SA-H,V, ECF subject to the following conditions: (1) Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination prior to the issuance of a building permit. (2) Recreation: The applicant shall revise the site plan to demonstrate the availability of some active or passive recreation opportunities for employees. Acceptable recreation features could include benches, picnic furniture, bicycle racks, basketball hoops and the like. The plan shall be revised and provided to the Development Services Division project manager for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. (3) Additional Landscaping: The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide additional habitat landscaping in the interior portion of the site to address the required habitat landscaping per the City's agreement with the US Soil Conservation Service. The minimum amount of landscaping shall be equal to a 2% of the entire site area. The plan shall be revised and provided to the Development Services Division project manager for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164, SA-H,V,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998 Page 16 of 17 (4) Location of Garbage/Recyclables. The applicant shall revise the site plan to indicate the location of the trash and recyclables areas. The areas must be accessible by collection vehicles, and must be screened from view per City Code. The plan shall be revised and provided to the Development Services Division project manager for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. (5) Pedestrian Safety: The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide additional raised walkways along the building at the office entrances to increase pedestrian safety. The site plan shall also be revised to incorporate landscaping or architectural features such as awnings to define areas where vendors or customers would enter the buildings. The plan shall be revised and provided to the Development Services Division project manager for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. (6) Reduction of Perceived Building Bulk: The applicant shall propose additional articulation or graphics to diminish the appearance of the building bulk as seen from Monster Road. The plan shall be revised and provided to the Development Services Division project manager for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. (7) Landscape Maintenance. The applicant shall record a covenant to run with the land notifying owners of their responsibility to maintain the landscaping in perpetuity. Copies of the draft covenant must be submitted to Development Service Division project manager for review and approval, and must also be reviewed by the City Attorney, prior to the issuance of building permits. (8) Screening of Roof Equipment. The applicant shall screen any roof equipment per City Code requirements. Elevations of the proposed screening shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. (9) Lighting Plan. The applicant shall be required to submit a lighting plan to the Development Services Division project manager for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. (10) Parking. For the larger building proposal, the applicant shall either: a) Revise the site plan to provide an additional 10 parking spaces; or, b) seek and successfully obtain an administrative modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance for decreased parking; or, c) decrease the size of the office or warehouse use to eliminate the need for additional parking spaces. The applicant shall provide documentation to the Development Services Division project manager as to how this condition is being satisfied, prior to the issuance of a building permit. (11) Bicycle Traffic. The applicant be required to provide a sign at the intersection of the exit drives and Monster Road which warns motorists exiting the site that bicycle traffic utilizes Monster Road. The design and location of the warning signs is subject to the approval of the Development Services Division project manager and must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Variance Staff recommends approval of requested Variance from Code Section 4-9-10:C in order to cut trees and clear land in steep slope areas for the Upper Monster Road Warehouse, Project File No. LUA-97-164, SA-H,V, ECF subject to the following conditions: (1) Revegetation: The applicant shall be required to revegetate areas disturbed as a result of clearing and grading activity. This shall be accomplished immediately upon the completion of grading activities. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164, SA-H,V,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998 Page 17 of 17 EXPIRATION PERIODS: Variance: Two (2)years from thefinal approval (signature) date. Site Plan Approvals (SA): Two (2)years from the final approval (signature) date. I � HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Water Comments Due: NOVEMBER 20, 1997 Application No.:LUA-97-164, SA-H-ECF Date Circulated:November 6, 1997 Applicant: Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest Project Manager: Jennifer Toth Henning Project Title: Upper Monster Road Warehouse Work Order No: 78303 Location: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW Site Area: 7.11 Acres Building Area(gross): 111,000 sq. ft. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments NO COMMENT. B.Policy-Related Comments _ NO COMMENT. C. Code-Related Comments New water main, additional fire hydrants and DDCV Assembly (building fire control system) will be required and must meet current Fire Codes) regulations for fire protection of all buildings proposed on the site. Any new water mains, fire hydrants, DDCV Vaults, water meters located on private property will be require to be in easements that will be held by the City of Renton. New water meters for domestic and irrigation system will be required sized to meet UPC regulations/requirements. Water (SDC)fees of$0.113/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. 77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date H:pesok4 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Wastewater/Surface Water Comments Due: NOVEMBER 20, 1997 Application No.: LUA-97-164, SA-H-ECF Date Circulated:November 6, 1997 Applicant:Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest Project Manager: Jennifer Toth Henning Project Title: Upper Monster Road Warehouse Work Order No: 78303 Location: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW Site Area: 7.11 Acres Building Area(gross): 111,000 sq. ft. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code)Comments NO COMMENT. B. Policy-Related Comments NO COMMENT. C. Code-Related Comments Wastewater: The site will require extension of the sanitary sewer main in Monster Road at Oakesdale Ave. SW with manholes to serve the site. Side sewer connection to the proposed building is required with the permit cost at$100/connection. Sanitary sewer (SDC) fees of$0.078/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. Surface Water: The drainage system and temporary erosion control for the site shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. Biofiltration will be required (more than 5,000 sq. ft) of new impervious surface subject to vehicular use is proposed to be constructed on site. The project will require storm drainage (SDC) fees of $0.129/sq. ft. of new impervious surface installed on the site. ..J& 1 11-i k-77 Signature of Director or uthorized Representative Date H:pesok5 i r / I , City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Transportation Comments Due: NOVEMBER 20, 1997 Application No.: LUA-97-164, SA-H-ECF Date Circulated:November 6, 1997 Applicant:Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest Project Manager: Jennifer Toth Henning Project Title: Upper Monster Road Warehouse Work Order No: 78303 Location: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW Site Area: 7.11 Acres Building Area(gross): 111,000 sq. ft. A.Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments NO COMMENT. B.Policy-Related Comments NO COMMENT. C. Code-Related Comments The street frontage(Monster Road SW)will require curb,gutter, sidewalk, driveways, street paving and street lights installed per current City_of Renton Codes/Standards. A traffic mitigation fee of$75/trip in/out of the site (daily) will be required. The calculated amount per the ITE Trip generation Manual. will be$40,260. (See attached data sheet). /1-0-77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date H:pesok3 i 1*1 �� • 1116. " SP. ;RT�:.;KTE MIVII GAITSO F 'E <•<7.,,.lsy^�.r; ',.rfvifvos -w<✓wo..esxY.�v.•.v;+l�r:tir»r.iRw.wx .na �,ry„� Project Name i)peev kiovl5tev Dad WaveGtou;-P Project Address 1200 Aifo,'i 5 ft v go( 5 1k) Contact Person Address Phone Number • • Permit Number 1-U/I — R•7- / Li- Project Description I I I , 0DO 9.ft rva✓e I/toL& € exyl kcj fug 87 ✓e Uic/s 61A4-6( 52 oioc.k too✓s 4 Li. ovt- ovade -tvuck doovs . Land Use Type: Method off Calculation: Wave lnoctsoi, 050) ❑ Residential C ' ITE Trip Generation Manual P .e /qj / ❑,Retail 0 Traffic Study (2' Non-retail 0 Other Calculation: F,ticd cuvvc eyuutot = 7 = 3.64D(k) -t 3142.65a 7= -7147,145 -t,v75 use Avcvaet R et I4 , Vb �, 1060- 'C11o) (4.s8) = 536. vfutl i y -tvips Use. less -' 1/kW , $75 /°-e'i • • (536A)(15) = $ O ) 260. ov Transportation Mitigation Fee: 0, 2‘0, o O Calculated by: /vict Date: // 5 Account Number: 105. 5RR. 3)80, 70• DD. Date of Payment • r-tea SY �.f O . c' .4. CITY OF RENTON �, N�O� FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: December 4, 1997 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal L )1.-- SUBJECT: Opus Office/Warehouse, Upper Monster Rd. Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary required fire flow is 5250 GPM. This requires a fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and five additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. A looped fire main is required by City ordinance. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the sprinkler and fire alarm systems. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals to be used or stored in the building. 4. A fire mitigation fee of$52,555.36 is required based on $.52 a square foot. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. • Y CITY OF RENTON °�A FRIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 41- )Nrc..0 MEMORANDUM DATE: November 7, 1997 TO: Jennifer Toth Hennig, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Code-Related Comments for Upper Monster Road Warehouse • 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,250 gpm. Six fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and five fire hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of building: 120,510 square feet x $0.52 = $62,665.20 This fee is payable at the time of building permit issuance. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 4. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout the structure. CT:ct opusupr li I d CITY OF RENTON • Community Services Department ,�4 of REi.T ~ py • 'c o Committed to Enriching Lives o MEMORANDUM Date: December 5, 1997 To: Jennifer Toth Henning From: Leslie Betlach, Parks Direct , Re: Upper Monster Road Warehouse LUA-97-164, SA-H, ECF I am in receipt of your November 25, 1997 memorandum regarding submittal of new drawings by the applicant that amend their application to add an alternate. My comments (as noted on the November 20, 1997 Environmental 85 Development Application Review Sheet) still apply. For the record, they are again noted below: A. Environmental Impact(e.g. Non-Code) Comments: There are no impacts to Parks. B. Policy-Related Comments Street trees, landscaping and irrigation located outside the property boundary along Monster Road is the responsibility of the property owner to maintain. Recommend a 5' at grade bike lane along Monster Road as identified in.the Comprehensive Trails Plan. C. Code-Related Comments: There are not impacts to Parks. LAB/dlf cc Sam Chastain, Community Services Administrator 97-590DF.DOC G'ohS��� 2aN+l�P.� C• 17Y OF RE7NTp�y CITY OF RENTON DE7f672/Ifro7 199 PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC RKS MEMORANDUM ����'� ��VISION • DATE: November 25, 1997 TO: Green Folder Reviewers FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning(X6186) SUBJECT: Upper Monster Road Warehouse(LUA-97-164, SA-H, ECF) The applicant has submitted new drawings which amend their application to add an alternate. A potential tenant has been found for the project, and their space requirements are less than indicated under the original project description. The alternate would feature a 101,068 square foot structure. Of this 29,965 square feet would be used for production, 66,103 square feet would be used as warehouse, and 5,000 square feet would be used for office. A total of 108 parking spaces would be provided. Landscaped areas would total 3,900 square feet. The drawings for the alternate are attached. Please revise your comments as necessary. Comments due: December 8, 1997. Thank you. • cc: H:1W W6ODO'IIMEMO.DOThh zixtex4A, 6-6.,e,e_zeljetwor,7, gfoe4, /a/5/.97 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-164,SA-H,V-H,ECF APPLICANT: - Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest, LLC PROJECT NAME: Upper Monster Road Warehouse DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to develop a 111,270 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four(4) on-grade truck doors. The applicant has also submitted an alternate site plan to be considered under this application. A potential end user has been identified, and their space requirements are less than the proposal. Therefore, the applicant is requesting review of a 101,068 square foot building. Of this 29,965 square feet would be use for production, 66,103 square feet would be used as warehouse, and 5;000 square feet would be used for office. A total of 108 parking spaces are proposed. Landscaped areas would total 3,900 square feet. • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL 1200 block of Monster Road SW„ LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton/Department of Planning/Building/Public Works/Development Planning Section MITIGATION MEASURES:' 1. a) The applicant shall follow the general recommendations of the geotechnical engineering report as prepared for the subject parcel (titled: Geotechnical Engineering Study and Abandoned Mine Assessment North 405 Upper and Lower Sites, Renton,`Washington) by Terra Associates, Inc. (dated December 17, 1997). b) If deep dynamic compaction is approved as a construction method for the site, then separate environmental review shall be required. In addition, additional studies and more extensive public notification will be required. 2. a) In order to mitigate potential impacts to the local and regional roadway network, construction hauling should be limited to off-peak hours of 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. b) The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee, at a rate of$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee, equal to $0.52 per square foot for new construction. The fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-164,SA-H,V-H,ECF APPLICANT: Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest, LLC PROJECT NAME: Upper Monster Road Warehouse DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to develop a 111,270 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four(4) on-grade truck doors. The applicant has also submitted an alternate site plan to be considered under this application. A potential end user has been identified, and their space requirements are less than the proposal. Therefore,the applicant is requesting review of a 101,068 square foot building. Of this 29,965 square feet would be use for production, 66,103 square feet would be used as warehouse, and 5,000 square feet would be used for office. A total of 108 parking spaces are proposed. Landscaped areas would total 3,900 square feet. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL 1200 block of Monster Road SW: LEAD AGENCY: City`of Renton/Department of Planning/Building/Public Works/Development Planning Section Advisory Notes to Applicant The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal• - process for environmental determinations: Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,250 gallons per minute (gpm). Six fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and five fire hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. The fire mitigation fee is applicable at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of building. The fee is estimated to be$57,860.40 (111,270 s.f.x$0.52= $57,860.40). This fee is payable at the time that the building permit is issued. For the smaller building configuration,the fee would be adjusted accordingly. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout the structure. Separat plans and pemits are required for the sprinkler and fire alarm systems. 4. Applicant will be required to provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids, or hazardous • chemicals to be used or stored in the building. 5. Fire department access is required to within 150-feet of all portions of the exterior of the building. Plan Review—Water 6. The site is served by a 12-inch water main in Monster Road SW, and a 12-inch main in the city-held easement at the northeast corner of the site. Upper Monster Road Warehouse LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page2of2 7. New water main, additional fire hydrants and DDCV Assembly (building fire control system)will be required and must meet current Fire Codes/Regulations for fire protection of the proposed on-site building. Any new water mains, fire hydrants and DDCV vault located on private property will be required to be in easements that will be held by the City of Renton. 8. Water System Development Connection Charges of$0.113/square foot of gross site area will be required. . . . Plan Review-Storm Water 9. The drainage system and temporary erosion control for the site shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. Biofiltration will be required (since more than 5,000 square feet of new impervious surface subject to vehicular use is proposed to be constructed on the site. 10. The site will be required to pay surface water System Development Connection Charges of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface installed by the project on site. Plan Review-Wastewater 11. .The project will required new sewer main and manholes with a new connection to the Metro main (per Metro requirements). New side sewer connection permits will be required with a permit cost of$100 per connection. Sanitary sewer(SDC)fees of$0.1078/square foot of gross site area will be required. Plan Review-Transportation . 12. The development of the site will trigger the construction of curb,gutter,sidewalk,street paving, driveways and street lights to;meet current city standards. The City's Trails Master Plan also indicates that a five-foot wide at-grade bicycle lane is required along Monster Road. 13. A traffic mitigation fee of$75 per each„new average daily trip will be required. The fee is estimated to be approximately$40,260.00(536.8 new daily rips z$75= $40,260.00).%`The-fee.is due prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee would be adjusted accordingly with the alternate building size. Construction 14. All required occupancy separations are required. Soils report is required prior to building permit. Parks . 15. Street trees and landscaping and irrigation located outside the property boundary along Monster Road will be the responsibility of the owner to maintain. 16. An at grade, 5-foot wide bicycle land is recommended along Monster Road as identified in the Renton Trails Master Plan. Wetlands 17. The wetland report indicates that the wetland appears to meet the minimum criteria to be considered a jurisdictional wetland by the US Army Corps of Engineers(US ACOE). Any development that may affect the wetland would likely require authorization form the US ACOE. The applicant is advised to obtain separate approvals/permits as applicable. General . 18. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 19. The applicant is required to provide a total of 2% of the site area as habitat landscaping per the City's agreement with the US Soil Conservation Service . . . SCOUR \ 7,,,,, �� /` /.� F I I t o !I 42 !7 u s I .7;.,,,A 41 itko 1�\ i6CC/ N 7i ‘e'p''..:1... 15 IRCy.,J.: I. , \ w Lc - Q • / , 19 T • .T"- I fr<;_ T , • 111�,. 2126 Acres • 1 1 46 28N . 13 , IS- I I GRAPHIC SCALE uw. J� ' _,_ .2,, G 6 � 20 I do T —�a�y .0 N' 11,14/ '',I' I p'' 1 r :\ Z°* / zse ,�^•\�. /j\ `:�.- e� •-_�' •---- Ln�1 ' -- .. -'- IZet19)1.— •-' " any . k )r� e A r1 N G TON T E C H N C A R ,, JI l Ia tv �1 a�l_.jam ;,jl, �26-R +sue �7 Ea '= -- ‘..T. ;7 . ,: a T s.• _•` i 16 _ A S H I •. II • I I �� if1{c[ G T;10'•�•7 T E C H �CYltl+il� l \--. CENTER l Ij,�T..I I l\\/, .- ., 3 CO .._ . % iiV • oe .. TM 2AT Aces�.i. -i --"'= •',• � - �I I _ _ _ — •' • YY '1j • • SAP'( .R \�i;' %/ ... = --- :t,. L. J • .4 / , .�.• ,_ `k o WPeef.ucb_I \�� we aq,,,, \ WAS I N G I 12 491I\- 1 4 Pors _____ GN1ee.AT, i LDR I .r I ' ' / \ ,�. I LDR,/PR ,� 1 6,:IL,12 O. O , I �j Iper;- r O•-_ ; F O� R T 1\ _ .; �� '" %- I ,� 3+0 I 1 'D T E C Hz N I, H; '•Z� . FORT 676 Acres V : ' - • %. I `/� so 3 s/• i ®,�F;F� ;d: DENT -— __ .‘: \-=- '��,.._ E.No--r=-- "1t, E ,, _ �`-- - - D E `�IW_ i_ - Acres ' ea ',rI ��� es aty �_ Eo EO so �� ll z3 a %t T iJ :r \ ..? \ iq F,11 _la sail 2 H 1 > - i .\ I F. ,t O , ZO l -S. /5/ST ST•. 26+. o , I \•,,-,?. y �1( T ;: ,. '', ,v ' Z a .. , • R, 2. i u„ .ad,,.:...„,,, ",;m 1 ' F "a `� �� O .,41,15, LDR t\ M.��:•. a ./� Epp . �` s!�`� M F� 'A 7Y o fJ `'_ ..ik , JE . / 9. - J•, „40 TERST, ; ;,T ; �. '10: ie.y4iest G� ,.�..,.. 0` a / , t� F '8:°�8 molt =,+ �Cr ®. ';9ei �� 't.L010 G/LI © '� ram- I o '` w-� Q ' j'•--�'y:�T 'o• , .�seh! k e - :..Aces ....,r R wo+ glp.=�%�r L') \ ±" p C5€] fry ': ® Pp, I '� L.•; sj I wo I . • >\ • A si3 -** '''��i r '•.� iii" �' Ta. ukwila Park .l ( — ./ a*n. !mil 1—pl,�l5i. , \ .. _ /�//� r�-`�tfp Ji%/ a 27 D G E�J', t : 'F�,p-Q s.e.W/ imp , �NY 1 II o Of, _ "� O.. 1 CO o-,. w. AtiVril6IV' a� b ;gnan^_O I 3,\ 'G)jiliihIIIBO5-rP 0 ' 38.EO Aca I ,+••97z�i,a co '\� •�' THLENTE ...//� 1 _ � I . �`T'q\� _ SOU . i . • ^ ` ram \ r..r. / _ - ____ ::�-• Il• <L' .• "T a'� 77, NFL. - ?i- . - --- • - - - - - I'+ /'t ! PROJECT INFORMATION z: J f_ 0 A ON t • !+1 d u G s. fl° cm -_ - a - 1 ZONING.I (MED.PIDUSIPoK 'f' !f QTNOVO BUIIANG TYPE-JI9 '�.%! -- i"'-<..',;-:�- - - a. _ Y A,..yr..._.:� .T�F 4. IL f. T :E ZY.. _ _ T 1 • ::1:4T J500Q.r i ^r_. -• RIBACH REWIRENEHI$SllBJEGI 10 41E PUN RENEW QIRRENT '�`. "e` - t,':'✓�i4:.:4',..7Y�''.,: - iW ENAY DRER THD9:IN G-iECT DURING DE9fAT CONS1RUClNN - �xrC" _/ YI , T IMPROVEMENTS. LI' �. w 'TAAI�OODf�"`�'y`� Of Ep5 NG "A,EOM PRONOEO: Mow!-20. six-so'u REAR-1 W ?w ' ^.�' •:s. ?��!■ ! ILtKIo zQE '�i.'T1• ;S( `_; �•�N';':l.Ly, ,ti,.:;•' IINIt • d1 A:1�CII7.7i71 .. 1•.. MIS SITE APPEARS W NARONK"RWO INSURANCE RATE NAP.DRIED NAY • • •''' :.5.:' :'.`•'.:i'�s Y`-•.i';}..i:..'' _ „ _ prc�Fd1DM �•� t • 6,1995.COMMUNITY PNO.N0 53033C09]6F,NO IS SWARD N ZONE - 'x'ARCS DETERMINED TO BE WT9DE ME 500 YCAR FLOOD PWN AND ZONE ... !�`•.IT;i•!`!^ �• A' )-- s • j AN F1000 DEPTHS OF I TO 3 FEET(USUALLY AREAS Of FORDING)BOSE •11'1i',"`:•'.3 F•!41,:)s. ,;,'•.�.� ':,. ; noon ELLVARONS 0(1000IN10(19'), rrl w 'fI,: 9.frv.:,•:r,: i «. .��' smsTIK 1711 NFR. i'1:1%". I1:• U'1`:; ':''�^":';y :�i: - - - - - , IiS BARED UTEIRES ARE 90 50 AS INDICATED W RECORDS NAPS FURNISHED " 'If, ' ,.. ,•.. _ - - BY O1HIIt9 AND VERIFIED YNCRE P059BIE BY fEAlURES LOCATED IN THE 'I1 ':1 ,tr g'ti' .StiSiir-Y FIELD. WE ASSUME NO Dvkir TY FOR OL ACCURACY ruat 6 I: II :i:. 1" ,• "7�� •�J ,-P `.9 11105E RECORDS. : .'. .• AFyr� ��: 'Y.'•'4��'.�, rJ'�I`1OZ:Lr�C1". . ' FOR THE FINK IDCAROTI CF EKISTING URGRES IN AREAS 13TTIlG,LL TO '�'• ,.; -• - ' �:BQEIIUJCA - -T���pry _-�,;:Y.. .. '- .. _ DE9IN CONTACT THE UTILITY OmlQT/AGENCY. '.'a.. .,: .... II•• :,,1:-.;� i�,,.>r '.•!�' - - —' . 15/NE-,.:,: ..t:;5,i,. •::?ry- G1F/PllIIDINE,5IKIARF F00TArr• i • 1 ;;{`l;;''4:Li k;i _ ..-- ', %` '� 'm' )06,106.Sp/FT`�-' G%� • a,. TOT SITE FOOTAGE. 'I� .I'•r" 'hry t. KSWAM W Q 309,99]SO/FT (J.13 ACRES) BUIDNG SOVARE FOOTAGE ..:,F�'.{p`^:r - 1 '„ • _ - • �- _ r!n/y.', .li, f. "➢lbQL'(«r#��Y����,:Y+.`Ga l - • O i _• WAREHOUSE 91UARE FOOTAGE.101 906 SO/FT `/i ;ij 11,►,,i., :',4'„^i?"`-i:'?.1;•'h,5r;' ®®f� _ TOTAL SQUARE ARE FOOTAGE. 0,906 50/R '� fs' 1 `Fir "�� \P.` T TK T :'il;: I,1 e _i:f,. L WNIC, 0 SWAItE FW AE- 110,90E 50/fT ��� �`!J - EWC _ � _ .;3m �l _- 1 •1 _ YrJ= - ::1,..., .,, r :.a" BV5D9TG FOOIPRNT SQUARE FOOTAGE.ID6,T06 SO/FT •-);'`' .R cR5'�- �lj�.r� �;1'Y - � `;{,- II'�,r.. ,5y�� I ��1(1070C' _ r1. SIIF/Rllil MNf.L0i IYIYFRAfF PFRfFN1AF.F� j. ,git � ,t' �r d � 1. R K BUILDING .31S I IOfi •`Nt'�`Si/"�`� _ Amxc.In I+: j' _ PARK N 0 5 ]G 11.2 R50 • _I n • _ _ 'I -- A/TJrm TOT .771E ] �'`i K 23 38/SD TOTAL N ."Tv I• (S /FT K 9.Q'Qt WS SURFACE) - I� I l `1 PARKING. rr ~-\...J%- �' _ .•I.�;-.:`�•'__'2T , - - l I;;! Caro • •• • Ar•. .„.,. ..:,. ..,.....„„„.„..v.„,..„. .,:. .4. ., , ... :...,...,.... fiAiith.••,-'''''''D 111 1 r • •. .:.'i-,,, ,,,,,10.f...k41,1,::!5:,-.4 ..../........1:7,7,1„,-:,- 11 ^,/, METRO ,�. I,,, ) , T,y'�=., gpy/ y1�..y ,,: •'• .V;,�i:� D••l•0 AS jY; \''%`l• / �; Drys.. ITV •,.: '• _/a /" 3F/ ,. Da f Ott A `,(i '1)0+,_:Y.?ri=,_S ,�� / �` N aano Ws A .v;,.3. t ><.; arT: �L141V % / Al O R mar :.®, .o�a ., I. • Ad ' • erw '.` foul wuufn ur. iy\•.. ,`' . - • • _ ••:. > C ''t:. ,, ;off-„ pm. _ .. ->,�q .`C+',=:':r-�, ._._.-.:� _. ap,;'`� \ .....,:.-. .._- ,Y.,-.•...._.... .._.:.•................ _.._. _ %jam •�1„V :>2 .s. 7 '- ,a7, _[., .i"'P�n'.:.. '• _ _ :14.: '•I0.l ^, ,_+' -' • +��• ! ; ?�70.W .��•`\$Ill " ... i./ ,.,- y "'w :`�- ri'. '=is--:' .; s;t•t `cal __ --- _- r_ • •cqu \ ▪ • •1� ......--'.r%-. - :.r. \ ,{\ -' 1::'` CIS'• )'i .`al •. '' :A tr •.' i �i r•• `ice ''f \ I I;tic: I j;; :',' it,..,..‘,,„...,.,,.,....\1,:., :4�� %; ,: .; °�. • 7 - ji� 1Yj:--- tl V'f, 4 -. ,! 1 i .,. . ...., ., ..s. E ... ,,....la. , ;,i,\,•.,‘..,,, ; • "If.`A,.tY.� =11111(:)*" .. • • ill 'a ' I 'I3 s t ��� � "°'•°' Opus Northred LLC 11,i w �. AHB—LI K 4 0410 Opw LI®fNwti wt LLO 1 PIE 1.1.403 11'I1 — ^ 4`' CIVIL 5T RUCTURAL ii rtoo ttinx�...,Ie,wao4. 4 I^'I �; ENGINEERS�PLANNERS • $ • 0 ' ;.fie_ ;•t �t%�t • f; r • D RI- i.P .. .._...-.- .tom.; .•._. ... _:.�' - z�. .. .. .._. ._._ _ - .._- .. tic r.. ... ...... �- v/ O ns Op . i.. _ .ti • ma # 'f _ - � , . I.■ � !?/ 1 r,..!.,..,: .,..,.t.1,.!.,,:„.: ,. ....,..,„ 12'ar " t.n - , z ._ ! 25 cc ' ,1: \ !3u'1k' � i' t' i pi /) . . „.:4?.....-;,Y.s.:•1.%,,, '':- ,' 4>''',.-,,,-f.,1:4-- 77,77: '=?,1ARAA','••\\„\..\S,::f.fs-:::-;-2.-1:;•.--:::•-- a i orrs,' .y .moo = �'~ 1: A , .err O ,i !I - t. I a .r 1.81 f ,�'Lti W // • !. ;:.. iI4: g '': ?a;y .n'• : N I i4r'.;z�?ram,+,•_,,`�r'- 'C ill 11 - - ,Ire \ 1 , A': 0 I An D i i. � *4V{.., I 1 =11100011."-"''' a t I I "°"°° Opus Northwest LLC i;iIi1 I (4-,'41...' AHBL 8 n Neer*Road bile 2 _ pas Mt LIC ill r ma' 1 Ligii *rift Ph. 11-.1 Ie -•. CIVIL.STRUCTURAL ii . 8 ■00-KM Mum .a4. ■ m.WA ■■oaa ua.■a.ao I•••� _ ", E N G I N E E R S•P L A N N E R. . . ' ,,..2.;;5•.".--;-.".„:-,,,,,,,""i'-' ..-- ..,•••••••.•••;" , •v.:-.. !.. N,',.',t:,•:'•.•::::.---;,•• . .--"'-'''''^'' ••' ••,!;-;''''''••;••:-..';'•':'.;'•••••^'".“' ' .' ...•••••,.,•:•.,,,,.•,•• ,'''''.";,,-:••••7' •••..'..•,...."•^".:::::••••••;.,...',..- .,••• ..." ..- •.s....:••••• ••• „.„,•• . ...•, . ' ^-'• ...:";;;:•'''','',.,!....;;.:.';'.^:: 2^..- .::- .>..• ,.. ,:: , ' !, 4"i qS4 •- ';".1-':..;•••'/,.:s.'7 . "-.;',,.,"--.7-.-?...!- - ;.•,. '''''• si,' ! ! ;!• .... . 2: ; ' i '. ' . . '•,.:. :; ; -1-.:,.. • " .. ;;; '•)1• rf-7,-,F5- •,. ,?'..;:!...'.,.... '-::1.... --.' !:i. .;,' i',,,6 l•'il.---:-... ,,,,-.—-:;i',-'-4.: • „.''.....: ::'...'3,:;',..-..:".',1.:•:;" .a. ,. , . -;•,"‘ ,.. ,,,,. •• ' • ':.'i :(\Jr,i,- " '1.;,::77,'-•';-;-•-m..,,, 1 .. ,,•'.:•,':;.'::;''.:..'::',i.";•:''' 0.4.''' ,;;`• '' / l . ';;; • j,;;„; ' ... . . >,...',,• ',..,,,,- -'1...".".•'.....:.;.<..,-::::...2 ,. ,., ...., ..;;; ;;,...1,11,..„51.E,1,.; .„ r:•'-':;'.. (S1VI LOV'JO ST.#06••YAW c •:.‘7,,..• '•0:• \ 7-o“8"!' , \''.•,../.•'. .V.Wien% : ,;:''.-.'. :'.• t g N :'.'':'•.'•\'''''' '' tt II i ., , (dll)Orli etillaR , • : -•..s.'‘•f•'....•• •,-.•;,::::..:‘:‘:'• ••••: •••N -',.. '4% ' '.<,'"' • gpm '...::•,i..,; .• •:.'..;.':',. ?;'7.---''..-•-•:-; .•::,_;.:,.:....,•,,,,c.;:;-,...::::,.,..' -. ;,,,,,.:,:e;L.,.,,; . qg . •, , ,,,......::::::.:.....:::::::::,......,...:,:••••.::-...:.:.:.:...:..,..:...,..:.::.,.:;..,.,.....,./.,:_.,....•„.,„, ......:;:_....v„,;., •4.,..: ';'',‘,.. '... ,''• .,. , ''''':'..;:wi;- :''. ,... .7'...:::,.;fl. :::*.•::';.'::**,....,•'‘:'.:: ''.;':.';•,:'.,;';'.....•:..: .;''',.•': ;". ii.-::•''..,•',.;':•-..,........1:...,.r!.--'•:,',' ".-., ' ', .f...,,, '.. , •' "' ';,'.',...,,-;,:":, -,•,;',.".'1=47.fris:.,--..-7.:';-",'";''.'"-:..r,..i z-•••-•:-.7,1-z:'`.-:'."7:7-...?....:1r.:.:...:•?!..:',*;;T:',.:; ;;J.-.- '' "- .,:--....'i'l'--''••••''••• 4'--"'' ''..' • ...,.'•;,.L .r.\•• ''. ''' '..','.',';',-: CO) ::',.-S.-..:..F.;-;:F.::-.:,Al'-gf.•::, I7*.i;17.1,Yi;F,,i";":,::;•;..7.,,-,-;:-.=:.:•-...-:•.z..":::F.FF,J. ..:f-7.:."...:::.::•-'i. ::::-.."-::-..:.:--':i.''••••,,;="!'......;:::'•7:: -':'-:....;''.:;';'''..*;.*'''- --ri's..-;••••',.'".`.?:,.. ,-";,....; i'.l''': 4") ;.,:"...',..;;:::-;";•'•...F.-•.-,.; -:-..:•:F.:::.ira.. .-,1,-;i:,-;,..,..-P.,a1":3;--.6,i.,s4c.,.. r,;:',"-;?'"?..;•,Y:S.-';>;;;•,,,,t';.:;:',-•'.-:,,:::•,:-."..*:'..j.,;:`'::-.':"_' -:. .•< ;-:.-:--',....7:'. .7:"..:-. "."2.: -..:"....',..:<-s-'.-•,. ''.;'-.•. ' I';',1":'-..._ "I ''-''''''':?-.:.4:''''-'.--- -':-CT:--ZI•Vi':• :;';--'f'7,t'-:4-:; .;Pfitl--;f:i--L'?.`•;.=;,:z,;•:.:7-7;::::------,•;- W. ---:"...:.-:.•'.2.-:-:; :.;'•'....::.S.::'. .: :::.7-.....::-....-::=...*:: '',..;•:'*••.'..:•'::'':"-',..:.,,',.'''''':•': -.'",--•'''''''....; .''.1 3 ..-.f,.....;.•;:7.........,..:4-.,t-.3.07....,:kg-,..:..:7,4.--,f1,:r]R;a:p.-;ii;;:if-j-z-J. ,,,,I.-...:,,,,,,f4-6.,p‘;::::7:....z...--,.,:-.., , ------:::-;,:-.,..F:F':-.,::::gilt-;.-.T.riiiS:': :•: .''''.::: ;''''',::'''''. ...';:.','• Il '?...il,,-;,-.,.L.. = .'::::.'•V:•:.;.:•:::•..r-5::-. .i..3.'iliTs.:::C."'.: ••••;:.'Si';f:;k.:7.,,Zi:::'.. qii'i''),fi.:J.:•:,.;:fli....'I•':.;le:-$0';'.; :. '2 ::,,'...;:=;r: .".......H,::,-,;"..::'''',:.',a;7 ,- ;"..,;-.:.• ii:-::,',:-`..':.;:-''''' '''.7‘' ,;liga,...,.„;,.. 1''::;'••,•'''„.,;'.:.".;.''..- .-",---,i-.ti'•--:-g--..,.::.7.:.1,-,.;:,:.;....!•:;;„;-X.:g:....:4:,.:-Iit...lTM.-1i.:;.Y"..fI:0::::::::-,.:.:t.,Ig..-.:,....:i:.:::-.....;t-;;?f.i5,:i:t7-1.•-A.-.4:1i:7.1,i.:i.g-4,,,::-;...-:1;.1-',.;:.:Se%.':?§.'':..';:;t;.V:''...'7.;:-.),;.!..;154-,,:-;-,-..;.:.-..:1:b':::i--t..-.;.--..".---...Fiig-.i.i.l...t'2.s`.$.....7-1i.l...".";k.,...*.;-....;:.i..;...P.!:..3.".'.:..R.:1 7.:i-';"',-.r::;.;;i..:. i f,r li 1'nRI-•;._c;a..4 " ;,;0;,,,b.,:,••p;;.;:.:•,,iv`..:-•-;.r''_-...:s.;t.•;•.•:-„,-"•':,..„:.:1.:-1.-•;:•-':-. ai-smsI‘, . ; t•-•%i!!'4191t.,;i1'::''''.;?';::,....!,:;.''',.'"; ,..;.- -.1:'! -, ,z ..4:\';•.L.,...-1.r.1;0;;,,il-A,.'..C,;i,L'5.') ..,:::.,,03 gg 1 ..!%44;l'2,:' .. At•;:,t_-j7'4,"IF.5.•!:••!:::;441-.',F-Y:',• -•.".*:;;..t.-.0.,'.(;-.--;'$% .::........\\:':'‘...\•.... -... ... ; I.:),1, a •;:•:',,.' l ,.\1.0j4' '' X .....,-Z.-: ):"', ..„ ..,•,.11..,'..?;": ", Akil ..4'•• .L.%.':•.:..\‘....\\." l'Itl' V.r.,,,',. ..:,‘".,fi.:51,ill'4i,g*.;-'..Z'''.•?',.'f',,%,:1:4;•:::..i:^4.,1(.2.1 t .,`;'\ • 1?4''',.. '''.1.'-',1`,V ,‘.:',,"kriV-- 7147;,..,,,:tr24537...-":.--'', '1:.;\:'‘.:'''Vk'''..\.°,,\''•ft.' '..::': . -.,:. „LAI _ ..„. ..,...—.. .. ....„,.- ,,,,,„:,i;,.:-,,,,.„;.;;;.,;,.,,,,,,-F,. ,,' .:.\ ..,.-.,-;.:\.-•-.J.,.." ,,,,-;,;;;;„s,4';'0,-,:',,..,,,,,,,;•..,,,;;;:.-,;.„,' -••• - • ' \•• ' ' ; - ' , -co ;:. :,i, ..c.,,,,„-, 4,,,,:.;;,,,,,,4,0,,I.,3" .A.;,-, Ng .4.... ,,,,',...'f.....,\.:;,.,., ,. ..... • ; '... ''.';',.:-,ij5,:l.,;311..;,,,,:--;-,,,,,..q,,,,,-„,,,. .......c......,..„..„..,,,„,,,, - t 2.,‘.--A' .-4w --. •- . '''''''\1,.,4.' '' ••\? - • ,.,:.• ..:;:'.-•:.t‘:1.7'..::Ii:',..5'-:!!'.4:•--i=:!.fi,A:;5.i. -:•,-!•1,:;,,,,,.<3, ?,..)''',.,:',,,si. -4;th-. .,\::,:••••':.:.?-":....M:: ::::':';:::.":::::::-;:t Z '-'.(''''')' i"I'...''' ''...4.•14.....!. . ::T'"' 4,..,-A;i ! , i....:\\ , ....-....,: : -Ite,,,,,,,, .. ..... . . .. .,-.... ..;',..,•';;;;.!•":':<"''"'' \'A\ ' / .,.ii:7,7 j;:7, , , .. :, r , .. , .,, 1\ ';5'g-• '•';'•\ ,s:•.'...'...."---7','-':'-.:-:::""•::'.'.'"". "*"...-0,';'!II:.‘i:-....`///,.'i .'1.' :4•7',,_':•:...:•'.'''..^.:',-,\ .... e. \ \ ''. ‘ .,•::\ ,It.-Z.\ ' '..'.--1°222121:'...."."..-.:"''91''''8omp G .,:11,.,:..j.,,, '.". .,. ,-;.. ,,,;:;,.:„..,,,,;:.:,• p.-.A....., '.'':' Oiliql7,..,:1::,;.,,:::::..:..!;,,../..,...,! ,,''', ...:-.:,4`...,-,M;;;741i... ...:r ,...- I •,..'1;i Z.,,. ; : , ::k,,, '"4'i'',.',.i,':N^'-• iii, '.al i 1111 ,z,• 1/,'•`^',^',".^,-.: ' ' 4 ,^'(,;';',:'...al ,7.,t'' VVV ^•^*"."'.1;:...:.:^.;:,..'11/.',/ '' ' ,.At Ar-2Al. -1 ,/ Ie..' 1 % ' ...1 ''-.,-,-'9"-. • • .," .• ,./ , 6,; RS • ,,,, :‘,..•`:,.... . • 1 ' ;••••14t ,_ „.1.';`,11''',',,s ,' ..,..^ .." ,,:''•/ ..' 1,.1,1 ..'. .k• . .4'''t. - I w.':' •W /....-5.5;40/ ',•:,s.i;,-, , .,7 .-::''''"..,/ ...'"Vi.,'''/.'• Fa IC:74' '):'';;Att.- '. '' • ''-?•1 M .,•;% . ,'•%.C.,7':','• ''d'A•1/7• *-j,, ...„ / ,.,-/ ,.." ,,. .,..:•:/- ..• k ''''';','-'" --•,'„I'„,(^,g,,:ii,-,,'„,''';,,i,',;-: . , r'''' •, l''',.;:',.•::.:., ,•;,.;4•:,;','' '' -.!2'''' '‘‘ ,,-' g / ..;...:' ,^,'',: ..':"^•,.... .0::' ,,:,, ':,'''; ^"-1..1t1-•'.,-4' , ... ., . ...../.// , :2. ,:., ,. ,,,,.._,,,,,,,,,,,, 1 ."----6,.. • ./..,,,--...,.,.. . - -.. ,..,•:,,kr,1:,ii,y-,..,4,;;V,,,:,,, ,A... i ..,...':,Z;/ ,1 , , , .:1-6i V.q. 14.1., f.ft.:`,-.:= ' ''''."'Kf-': : :''''L""" ''!'I/ .: ,..':; ei 4e • ) I i r...•,•:;)./.,y; P4',4..7,i.= 4,i...qih':, ''. i '• '' • .. .•',...',...• . . , ,'...,7.;;;',-,W,' ••••);i5",!.,:: ' ., .• ,. -il..4=';•,•:01:.;;41;;.•••%.',g i IQ ,-.. ,,,,,,.• • ,,,,,-,,,,, ..", , •: , .,,, i , , 1, .., ':,.ff,,,,,,5-,.•,,.1C4 ...:,.,. .. - ' V",E,:Fi,,,-,:-. .." .^,c,',..';'."„,"1".;' V. ' .... ; ..,:s. • •• ,.. . ,•:.-.,-.1.,,,,,,,:,,`„t';,g,',,,T,i..",.''':';';,a'... " ././— " f l''' 1 I ; (, / , ''',"::*:,':;3):e2;'1"'''''' It ..,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,•:,,,,,,..- . , _ / ,....., . -:,,/,..,...;,.:::, ,,,4, . .,,,,,,,,,,,...:i ,:„:‘,,,,;, .... .•• ..,, i .,: •••' ••'•"/ ::?••..• ,a-:••••W:•t..."0.4!:••••e",..-•..' ..!,....,R". „ ' ...i.x...,,,r.,•:..q,,,-..,,,,s,,,,.......,,, ...;*;.,-;•, .,..,-. • . ,-, :,.' .. i ..:.,,,,,..,!..,,,..,--v.,-,....:,;,.:-,--i,,,p,,-,....,,,.• i .,y, .,,..?,..;:. -•, .. ..• --,,-.,,,...g4.--,.y.g.,..ir.,.... ,..,,,,,c.....,::,i,.:5g,..,,::,..,2., ....I , . , ,. , . ; r; :' ,, --.,r;;;Kie!.•,•.,- :',-... ,;z:•'.,.,..4 1-i .1 .2;•:;,-.••' -. -" .' .',?.•Ta'.,.:,:;'ZA.,'73',.': ,;'ff•-•,;.",,. ..z*-X,C4:••••••••-, •\ '., '-•.,i ‘, 1 J . '• . S '...0.4,....-i-, ,r.:T.,i5,:'„•.,•2<.• ,,-,.....i I , .• .;:..••.- • ••• „f.'1,.•.,:r.-7.M-A0-7.'r .,-f:l.':','V.02.','';',:r.:'''•". , ,. ; , I l' i \ j;',ii•;; s. ,--__ -: .,,,,A1,:,%,-,,J.:,'T.,^3ilt.,.,,y.;z:..;1:4.•-t,.,:i-,Vt,,•"'2'.'=„^ ..; .,::.",.. /‘. i.„...1 ' it i ,., ':^i'',:f.;:-.-, ia, S:P;I•i•C%",.'"--. ' ^; ..., • .',"Vf.•:^--- - ' ..,,,,f,s5„;,. .,•:gkr:it7g..'‘,): :4 7,,,.''''''':V,,,,N,44 '''''\%---•, ,,,'"., ''. ''. '; '. 'C.? .'N'Iv''''''^ '-'iAi'''!4:t4Z2.11. „.•.,...`' •-•.:,./ -,:',,,,,',-.•• .. --..:,.. ..Pi'Wt" .:$^4q;iV"513;....g,i,::,".:Ii,"-,,,,''''N'A.-^1 ---A '''--.:,'",. \ k •'. ', • '. V. , • s'',-.11:i....1; 4;";i^??.'41,!;,,:.',. : ,.•''' ./..,'...".:'`*-'?"...'.::..,..:,.. '..:'.0VVV.`,:;.:iP.!W.-g-'..1'1:•;,.:,Vgig;,i`14?. .',,,--."- e ';-., ...._,.. i",.. \ \ ',....:.., ,',..:. •••-. .: ', '-. '.'i':-:„1,-..k.'i•.tfg:!;A.-,It-;,.,?,.:::.t''..., \ ...,,,.:"•••. :',•;,-:.. ,i,'<;),-•.i.y.• ...--:,.,i',-i,...,,%:•.:0,,,,o-tr.g2 .,,,, .,,..,i- --..,. ,. '.. ',. 7.4" '.... ••••••.., a ., 1.-..:.,r.,J.''',-,.:',-;.,i,:or.,;',.!3t7-..:-. ,.............„.. .;,......,;:-..../.4.,.....-.‹,,,,,.. . . ...a .;,...:4•„„ ..,./,. ‘.. , \ ‘....., . -.... ..... .„,,,,, ,,,,,, -..., .:,,,'":4•;;;;• ..";,,,, ..‘--:.,-,.,..!-7:-.:.:,".-.,'..-.-' '•.;.'dp,..:'::. ,-,,-;e.,.>5::g.:14'.,, -,,_.,- ,... , ,..,., ...., ,,, ,, mr.,...;,;,,..,,,,,F,-.... ,01 , ,,, ,. , , , . , g u•...,;,,,,,,,,.....,..:.:-,...k.:5., ..,.., „ k .---,_ ,.,:,,f,-"3.: ::1 :.,.., •'..,-,-..., ",,...-77:,:..._....,... __ . -....2.1--,';`:::::!"1.0 .' _.......:::-.;k1. 78tUi: i ' ! 1,-; .',. ‘‘, ',';'.. ''.1V Y....'''''C "-4.'•5:J:::'-'::0'-4'''^i'''I'';''' , i;....^ ,t „ ! ..;.,/._ ,„ ., •',..- ...g A ,... -A-i;.",.,r., '4 S, ' i.;;.. ..':,.. .,....,1','-..1... ._ ftsttn, , ..-S ', . . ,, P7ft '.- -4---7----- kH'.'- iiiirt..----"III&LI—iiMiL.. , :711k... 'Ina' ..---A,1: 1:J:..., - • " ----' tillIP .."' '.'''''',..„, • '''.,.-...,t.' ..,A, 4,- __:..,?,..,,,c1 .., Aiii—com.---Th....„.. '''''''''.: 5''''- 4,41111-- -'- ,.. ' - . •,„: .:. &3175' ..-= ..... ... -.- li --..,4.t...,,.•,.,.;.-...--4.t..r?P:NT,...;re. ':':-•-'.•:'•:;:-...:::,.-• •'',---.;''f.-7-::,7' '`,.'';'----,::4•Z.---,, "7;:: -4, ,,:, '.. • ', ---:•-',-,4.•i-:,..:,.._......02:,?•••••: ',1:: :;;:.--.ii,,,. ; .:4,' • ' T' ,1,', ,.' '."' .--.--"L'''-'- •, •••, .,.. •.••--••••.,, 1 III() .• pi ..` ilili ro06 °Pus Northwest LLC glii 1 - 4 . la ^',- a g! ' 1 . tt f ,iii UfzeXestw Bud U11110 Pim 1 eil I''':* .r AFIBL, CIVIL• STRUCTURAL 1 ......, ow liorthlwoot Lie ,`, .. ' ENGINEERS•PLANNERS no z Roo•IWO Mono NG lits/04. OW..WA'14004 maul** — • ......... .., iv , . ...... . ..„ .. . . • • ' -•- ...„;v‘;:i;•,.. s s' ' c•;'-..v.-, ....•• ,,, ' . •':•••' . • . cr.:..%-:5''.....;'..:(i.4.'-'-'.:.'7' .'.::.. ..: '''. '''';;,.'''''' ,.':e4.1'..."... ''':;.5-. •'....''.....‘::., ;*'': :" '"'• '...ti.;':,r.:.‘,.:I././11 .., ....-:,;.!..::;?/.12.S. ;.''... •''''.•'. ,-*'''..,.,...' ^- „ . ,' c': • .1:. . 1 , -.'-' - • ' .,.:5.,i,I,•ii cf../ .. . .._. . -•• „ . .•. .„-.1,,• ;,•:••••.f.„. .‘-'•', ;!I f„,', J•.:,;•::._ • .. :r 1 .'; / ',--,i•-...,- ";......;i:.:,.•-•: ..--:-.•./.. 1.;•,..,:".:•'•%"•.:.:::-:----:-Si',:;-;'. ---,;i7- . ' ---"F'••'..i. :St! i io' '111.'7.,..,.•.;,•,:;,:—•s r-,----", ,.......• ..• ,.., ,,,-• • .i :I':i,'t,IA A....:,c. ...„.,-,1,.',?.----s:.:-.--,:,:-..,.'. el,..• ... • .. ii i..,, i.,,:t:,, - .•, .-:. .:...,;.....-:,,..1, \ : ....,......-., ... - -,-.,:••;,-.•-•-:,:-:,, • ...• .. , ,•••..........:.......,:4„ ...: .:.• . ' WWI LOV'.5 SWIM.V3St t ':. 3;; ,.0\ 1 s s • ..S.:::..,.\'''':\',%k 1 1 g S • i .,,... , . .„ -'4'g A '(au)-. *wog i '':,.‘ .-:,:-'..‘;'':.. ' '':.',';?.%.,Y-.1';,',,,t' ,„;,;,,;,:.;", •:,'..'....', .•-.:.:',. .‘.;:'• ..;-;;".:;;.;\''''';,;'. .:,:4', ,...,-;-}III l,' :::•••:......'." 04 E NIN s: ,, , .,•.: •,-..:::-:•...."••:•.,"•,.::-:.:.•:••••••••••‘,.:•:•,:,, i-,.,•••••--.. ...•••••;,.• ..:.•,,::•:::,.•;--,: 1 ,,,,•,... - -,,,, , 7, ''.,?..:•.;.;.,•:!.....f, .-,,,,-•••••:-:„. ., • ----•••••':....s.,.:.,:,,,,,--_H-L-.:- ,,,,-,,;.-,:,:s.2.7,,,,.•..•,;;-_,....,......:,-, _...,„,,,....._ „.•,••; .. ,•••:,•,..,- /..,•••,,,•::,....'••••••,e- •••• !--".- .......,,.• ••••••, •-•..--,'.. ‘ •,-:;.,•-•••• a) ,--,,..,:.-f_,,,..i•-,,:•,„2,„.,.„..,••• •••,•-•:-.-:,..••••..:,-,.,:s...-i:.•••••,,,•••-i---,--;••:,=,,,T-;7• ±--;.:-2H:..-....,!„.:•:-:.,ii•-!?::::-,.ii;,_,,,::•-. _:._•,:.,•-,,,'•,•,,,,,,,,,-,:...-..4,-..---- ..2-, ••... ••••.'.,,..,..,, . ..,;•••••••••• - •••••,.. •,:„ ,.., ....:...;•-:4 •, ----•-_,,,,,z.,2A,,,,,,,,,,•;-.,,,,7,,,,,,,,,•?•,---,...z,..1-.-_,-::::•...,-,,:-.7.:,-- :-.:.:7- -,-: -......*:::,!•:.:.... !':::" ---- /,,-•-;••:.--•-.::47,-;::•.!..•:.:'•. -,, '-.. . :-..;--i M -S•::.-...:..,.5::!,, ,e:2-7.17:i.•••"...'A'r.',R7fte••-•/•!.1''.::;‘-i,'..;,,,...Ti..f.:•.,:T.:•;:.'j:•7!:::'.' *::7"-.2.......;.;i:-S:iY.:........-:Z!...-:;H:': ris...--...-.1..';`-'..:(7'.."..4...! ..eC.:.•7•1•5:!:.:!..±'?2$•'!'iv.',....,,it . .1!....:•.,,f'•!..,....'..,•.:,.. ••••''''''! ''''''. I....EP' C) '2. --;:- .:,.....p,:','•••::,f.;":_•7,...1'1:!',..±:iE,',H*7F.,SE'..:"„7,: tg•-ii8:43.,',V•ir.f,;;;;:.i.::- -i;•-;-...,4:.:E ..7:.'-',....1 .-L,'.:-.::••::.:1.: :::.5......:.z::1:-:'.::::i:7a':: :::::::.:•:;::-.......;•:..-•,:::;1...*:•‘:, ''''Z::-,-. !*' p•...' : "1..----.:':,;.:•-.f. Vt.'".V.'ZN: ":.-1. -:. .2•;.-e0 •: : •-::.•' : *,..:-2-.--:: ::. ::::;:g_.:'•:.•7•114f:-.;::--!.::.•:..: .•::..:':::'::'•. ':.::•,•••••'..':•,.-;'''''-- ‘l',':;„.•------ 0 f'z''.':•••:-.:::':;:73:;:Z•-•!. ..‘!;-,:fj-','•E'l4-KcA*4$V-7--trr•-•-:::::::,52T:i..-:::'•;,:i'ils `c:!;•.:..---, ....:.•-••%,..,-..-2,-....1::•••:....g„ilt:i.s.t.,:??2:1::.:..:-•::-'.-`,...',.,-;*•••z ;,......:,.... ;•-.1,..•,... z ...',.::••.,... .:;;,1",:•'•...3:::;-..'j:•::•,-:•14;,:-•.: ',.?(. .f:•-,T,:•''.-.,V; ;;,P4.1.ig.',?.:;;;-:-.:1....5:P;E; .;.:f1;f•-zi..;••:..1f.;';:''',7,..-.-;',?4.:.:;•:•-•:::7:'.'2;.4.- :;-'Ski.'.:-.;.!`'..--: .:*••••; ,.:Iri -.—i--;... 6-''''''s• . to :..',,••'--:::;.:n;-;:,.7.:?_'7;:fi ..g:t4:,!..kiF:i1,7:-.4::-.4 ,.zgE..3:.:1-:.'4•JE....1t :::.17g-::::•;•-.4g:•';'r'.:.1'h-,•,7,-:-.7:'..r.:z.--.i: ::::;?:atg_4.45,..it.-::•.,,,':;.:',..:.2.,..`•';'f;..••.. 0011.13---'42111k.-: .p .:.-..;.,•,::-...2„,..--. -;--- --•''''---1'...;•••.,-21,5.••:.•:::•:•:.:--r:;...?,-.4it!..,,Y...K.';-;"-i.:,--ii.`P-S',u,'..,•;-..-f.;.?'....:,,•---.7:•••:::,..--;;;,,:::4....-2.----i..!; --., --- --7, 7 "• ,.,..:-,,••*,-.',1..;',.Se'l• ";";:"'-.:::-. .. .1...-- ..,-;',:.:::‘•-,--..-,---,..i..„7,,z94,6,....,.„,::: ,•-••••-•.•;::-.:::),;,,,,,,;:-.:„.J.,,,,f; ,:•.;ki.:,;:-,;•:3.,.. .,,0......,- •L-...:Ip;,.......-------; ..,,•• - __ ...„....,,,.-- ; ; ;.1.•,,1., .,\ ....,....,..,-.,,,..-_,,...,...,.1,, .:! ,,,57,,,,,,;•...,:,,,,•.::.4,4-.,.c,....,,,,2*.,6...,,,,„..--...1,„:„:,,,,-..,..-•:•:••:-....,,.„..,,,,,•;...-0 _ _ __-----,,,..-..,.-,-..,-..91%14-f i ItR. I. ! : ; • , =--:.....--,...-.. -..f. .:-;.;`g,,..,-.‘:-, .4,.f.;(..A1--,-,,7- ,..7,1r. ,,-.,-,..-.,::,....,.,.,,-..;....,..!,, .„ -_.,„,1 , 54-,,:z!..J.In5•2•t-,4. ,,,'. ,.-•,,, 1'.' le li :..,P7..1.,., \ ...-2-!..„„;•:••,--P,„•••,:-' :7. :,--. ,...,. . ..,..,;,,i.)..,,,),,J. ..\ _(A.:3:,::....„....5,..:.,.,•.,•4...,,,,4p.e,--....5z.:4,-z&0,k; ,..,..\..:..,•......,..l,i.1 ; i,....,:l .,,.•6,,Vi::,31;.•. .' , ,,. - k4.4,..7k.kg7C:,cy,,,,4,,.....'P.",,t4.L...:".7.,-*-1. • ...,...s...:,•,...:,,, ....•'...4 ! .. , t, •••••.-.-...f ,4,-.,•:.:;;;';!'../.,;:'V.....'; 1.,,. , 40.'.. !;!,!;•''•. . ' .•-\\ :;,;'.';',:.'$.:M: \..',,,,',:::.:,,,,:',';',7:,•::'•,!:1,610,';;;-!!4',41N,"Ir'!--••''''s:''',....'‘•!.:‘.:\'',V.•;k! '4:42 Al .'--t,. L,•,:.-,,,,-,,, ,e., .., ,I.:. ._,• .....!:,. .,,i4top„..T, ...../...;\`•,.;,,.:::‘.,..,%;.;! ..,, •:,,,,, .. , •• - . . \ ; '5.;g:0:fiii;y....,-Ife:t--7.,-.,‘,i.1:i.4.1-`,;.,21- s,ilo ,;•• ..g .‘,".,*. .-,`.',,,,Y.,e.1 .:-.. 1--- =4-1..;:;:‘, .../.,,t,..:,:. -. , • . ryl:.;:,,,,:'..y:4.--.v.,.;::ei-41.:',-,v.,:-,,,F4A1...4-Fi?,,.....„•,..-,,;•'',", ':,,,.'a,‘,\1.‘..\•,.,,,,1 0;''.1,,.. 41 .1/ . ... . ' • 'CP , ,,,,, .,,.,,.7,,,, .....:,0-,.."11,z;e•z:".g.s.4P.0.1 sa!:'•,, \'';\•••..,Is.,\A"..\.,', ,::‘11..,t....._._..._...,:•_.11E. 14)• ,1\ ..,, . ,...,. ,,,,•e...,•1,,,,„,;;,.,4„,..,.,-4,ATIF...i.;,t..4$,A,Te, N. ',1 1..:\\\'.'..,‘.Y,',...'-.72::...... .:.:::,:` 1.,',..Pri.L.:f4......:,•• ,;••••,,,,..,<---••••••••..:- • ;= i; I.i illim 4 i . ,,...,..,,,, ,,,,,.4./,....:.....,;21,.,.... .•\.. •• ,.: .,,,,...„, .,,..;i...-;,1:',:• ,.....z.; 1 ...'t ,ip•i 1 is;lc. 011iii;,, .,1,s'•,.:;:::;mi':7'....,•ir2;.:-..,•:i i! .1 1 1 ill 1 '''''''..T.'!!!.;•*„.•,,,:•, :i':';',.....14...•;.;5:`_:::-....;::.:1_4. - '.'...0''',.Y dY, .. J ; ., Vv, \ n, '., .•,''':,\ '1:4,:.';''z',.\ •:',:••••:.•••;j:.;:.:::::'::•."-:.7:.:_i"::-;":...-.•:°=-.(21) . .9■,:mR41 ; . 1.11,1,is,/- i;" ..%•-•'":•';A i44, ii?,i...-\ .. \ -. , ;- I ..'_.-'T S.: .Nal ._._.1,7.: . .,5;-:•?k ' I :...,..,'-=',..-•.'; \ .'; .'; \ '',.t.Z.:„,;.;;;. :_4111O---,77!,...Z.N,ATI;;;. . . ...i!•I 't:''.: ; ..1;'-;$4.',',;:::."';,,S,f;:;;',.::- ..,-',=-7'-:-.,•;-.:•--:;)' --, ‘ ':.;,;, '' ';;?--:',q‘..i; -i.'„;,,71',-.••mini ,''..2‘:'‘,,t:A„,/,,,,ii ,..,,, „...4,,..„,... . ,-;47.„-,J.s',•,:,'•?, 1 ! ,;,:',.'1%;/.../.2.s. .' .i.;•-...:-.-2,/ • //;,,f ;:.,i A,',`>.L,---, -.';;:te:7, -:`'7. • /...-..,J,: 6, ../ ., i; r ' ' 1 ':;-:Z--' ‘-i-.:':*' ' ' -„;;':,i''';5::-;, .1 ..." . ' :I.:,,,,,'---.-/-; ,,,•1-4, ,',1 .„.... , • ; ; 1 .0,... i*'34,,,, .0,,,,-.:41 '.7sY\ 411"i.,...., '....';.4.!: ,' :: ..' ••;''' .:'. ....:". .' ••• •..!,'g —s-.7,-,:.8&'., ,;s:i.i.).• i 0,,,,,,,...1.:,..-,- -,,,,-- ;,, ii•-.. .; ...- „......,-,,..• ,.•••..„.•;,•- •,..= 11.74•4:v.;;.,5-:...f.f.t,.-:),--,,7 f,-,s,...:. ,,,- , •,-,.:-41: " i,; / .1 i ,--. :' / .,.,- v 1,-.„,,,-4-0-:.9,..:,.7/...,;.•:::,-, •••:,-,,:•,,,,, ./..1.,-f.:',"'. ..', 41,.?'„: .-k-,„...'• ,,,••:"../...,-, - ,..,0 •;• ,;'40',1•:!,,•-.:••• ,...)a / ..,.: /.,' ,•:;,..• ..'• -.I'.....;,-.. ... ,•-•.,,,....,-;,1,..!;5;'..-.,•..?- f.s.- ,.• i ,••••/ ,....,, is ,.. .-. ,..- , •••••,1.40,,,,.1.);,•1..,,-..4,:s194, " •.' -:,-,4.-z4:••••1•,.....: ,,..c,-..,-,,:, /;:'! ...6 ':';'',.; ••-'•i".'Y IA ,• .III ''.'"./ .ii ../-1.,' :•,lisVi,.."4 rgt-'4',',7 -6.14, ;Ai m • • • 1E i;;, ./-/ ,•e.,.=,-P .'-':,:, '1'''. : . ,.'. 4f, .„ ..' .' . / ., ,..1 fl.-11 .:,.... .: -4s3-',''1.k:',i.:i'',-,;'-7•7 . 1 \--q .. ... ...‘„.. - ,...--Y,:fti,',,,-•-.,,,,;7pp... ,,,," ,,/ ...,.'I. /•••sc,s' I s i '. lr'"'''")'''''' .7-447'::0%i'..;'•••k-,41 % 1 ./..,''t - • .•_•,:;'.'',.skss--,:i-,.,-,,v.,: i!,,s-,: .•./ ; -•; i ••• I :' ,' , • . .., , . , A • ,:'*-,... , - . ,:.--,..„,•:, ,--,-^4,,.s,i-,::•,..••.;,,..-A,,,,Y)?..P,..s.c.f.-: 1 /.••••• +. 0 i ..,' s tss .;•:•( ,••• •=r-;-•,t.4.•";.'.7:451,-,,..,;.--•.,;:s.;57.-,.",.-,... . •;:, '... !••••••\ ',-.'t i .."; ,.' "as7„,;".,-:'..:•;,':,:ae.0',"•,:;;.,."1. :••,1. , ' V V'''.. •..' ' • ,',.0;;%',.4'i'..%''.k.,.9-.'..14;ea'f*.e..i‘f.„ '..1',... '.., /: : ii ! ,:. '..,, 1%3',i v-;::4..f.,'.',.`,'';;',••••-•4, ‘s.'i •-....i •, 1 ; , ,• : ...r :,;411..,..,;?.t-:-.1- '';',ki '.:''''.•' • :. •• .:,-•- ' •-• ,-1.',V%:.':111-- ..'.,..--.!;5:;:'`i,-;F:i;i,', $2;.1 '.... ' i :I • 1 11,`:‘1.T. :•'''-',NZI:,!/4i`,,,...-.,•• \ .„.: .../,1-:.!.....:.:- ...::::::: ,..A;,.].,,Z.'gg ,'":•-.0,•'..g•-•VVA'?!4-'?4, .\ ''''''''..,.1.\.. .:'‘••\ 1,,. tt 1... 1:-, \',. •('-.14-a•:.1f-JAF-Rt;'''•A. ! ''t ,. .4•..... .,•'- -,Sit'':0•(:WPit,':;.-lf.*,' ..."'''''U .N.11 ••••"*". c; . ,..„,, , ..i,........ _ ,--4,,iry,';-,...,:,,,,•ias's..,,,,,„ -•,s :'.sx:7,. :gis, ,.;.•--••••„. ,,-;.', .1., \ \ \ '',..:'••••.*.,:.'•"-. . .'.• •D:N".'7•!:::',..i.•:;;-';••0;;;'• it •.• :::,.1;:,- ,•,-;.,,,,,,,,.,-;-,,,,,,,i1,,..,_ .;, '". -•,•••• •••••: ,,....,•. ..._ FA4`k:•:/-4;'4::••••-A..- .4';'ii.-t?,,i•... -'4.."-:. •". ',, ---1., ‘.., \ ••• ; •-,' •••,. s•._ ',.. ,s7,!.,,.::_...-t,.7:-;-ic:-,,,.-:;,•5=4"-'4,•.,,;;' - A, , ., r.. ' , • :" •s,s '• •• -• "• `s-f.--:.-6,": ;.t,..;:,.`,,.-„F•Mr4,-,,,:.f,I. . \c. ., . , ,. ••,, -- -... 1 ..,• c:..s..trf: '......- ;--•:•.;:5,•••"?'sre.,--•, ,•'';t •:•:'---..,...:, "1:;:„.""111141,"-4,",• k,'•' 4/:,.'s.;:•../s •,-",. .?1•4?...;•;•••••;i, ,Aiy.",•.04' -,.-7...D.. / .„ \ \ \ ..,. " .,, •-.. •••.,0, • ..:.,„;;;-ilf.f.s;',.:;.43,:-i',,,,,....:..,-, , ;1 -,..'',7,,ti.,•,•;',..,1)-1,..?2.-.:.......s.:1 ,'" ' ,:r:I ei.--,t,:f.,:,:,,-,N,,,;.:,,,:,• :--,,,-, : e g I . ;\ , , \ ., ,;..... • ,, • . ,.;...,,;,,,;;;,y:.•,;„,. .,,,„•,,,;,,,„ ..-,; --......,,[..,...,,,14.A1, ....._.__.....-4 4 .••••i 1 i t..--",, •.„.,,' \. V.";•:-'4:1 ,"-:.:',:'-i'.--sg,*. .,,,,,,,. .'.. ., . , ':.-‘.."' '''"',.. '-:,';.;,....•.„--•-,-J.r.:, .._ . , . .y,';'•••'.72::.. -,,f':.,K..•,,? eft,, : .1.,;.: 71,!111 :-:.!ii " . :, ,1 ' .:,...(• ‘.- ••, %„•• ...e ';.,- p=-7,-..,....--s.t, : ,,. .• •-I.,. - ,,...:'-`'...,‘,-,.,,,..-:.,1.-,.-7..,,,,Arit ,-.....P,,b91,-.... .._ ..._ .,:z...._ —1,,•vp' r /•••• . .. ...- , , , .. -. ''''••jir ':x' '. . ?.. Ant k'"--7-----!,./41i ...i.....2-7--.-:.•.7: 7:::f:::' .....•_;-.'s-;°-.--- •,•,-,-.1,-• --••q•;;-..ft-r-:-:••,-:::n .. . „-......_ "••••-•t•-,- -.,;:,1•-•-..,,:_p-:N.::',1.•--,,•:.',..'fic.s.!Y..v.,a.:r..s.•.,x,t.--...„'„ -7 :-.,„ . , ,.. r.,., :„,:•:,...• „..,,,I.I.,....s: . ..... .., , ,k 11-,' (41 ,, Opus Northwest a Ni o AHBL, is Ci)r Upper Waster bed r 411 • !t.,-% . I ,11;:ir ii, .14. • ...-: i v I. i 4114 Draw Mil ;lit ' ..`^ A CIVIL •STRUCTURAL gg, i il 1 0...., Open Noithinet Ile I.N1 3 . " ENGINEERS•PLANNERS n' Itg)•Ma M..VG 111110 Kt Wows.WA 1.1401 4211.118.4100 MOW* In “ :-ICI. • 1■ <K M'ON CCCR FALL PAK `/ :W + • Tab'oN TrpICAL TTP^A� = v Ca f= 000liTP.\ri U J it aw�o— _ {ow 1i _Fimtv� _———— .W i. >O P%LO1ST$-F =LiN/;4T I O}� VW• w re O a i — I I I I I { T3__ I l l h[ r ZAIMINLOOR - I Ws®T asLi'. 1 IO14i O w• ry 2 N IT Ftm.m.an.ai.offlERE- El }TM hi i .... bOUTF- iLi1A4T IO1V O (� w• r� 3 ., _ _ ___ m m _ ---- ---- m m i-.i1 f1a!-- 1# o Y S4bT II■L=YATI01%1 O w• r o 4 t F t � Ord AGO OB A OOP PI OCT f/ JM Ar 1I133f0 . AS M wYU Q Q Q Q T Q Q Q Q ,o 9 1�Tm•-o• Jy• 1 -0' `RC .A'-0• -0• S'-0 '-0• -0' ! ed-O• 1 fp'4 1 00.4• IMMI <K 6'-CI 10'4' '�A I I I �A. I CC) lZ I t I I I I I ► I f i ~<, UJ I I I I I I I I I d s� I I R I sa. I I I I I I a ]•C00 GOFT.T60 Oy 1° aroar omca X ya, I III II iW 4 b I I I I I I I OW• 1 I I I I I I 1 , 1. I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 A I I I 1 I I I 1 --' Q -_i------------G------------L------------j------- I---------I ----------- -----------�------------I---------- 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 ® o I 1 I I I I 1 1 ga I I I 1 I I I i I I 1 1 I i 1 ♦ --- - -- 0 1------- --=1 ---------- --r -I----------- ------- I ---- I I I I -- i i i I i i 4 I I I I I I I I I 2 I I I I I I I I I MIDII I I I I I I I 1 I I- - - - 1 I I I a „er,—,— I I I I I I a WORT GM. I I I I I 1 .14 ii! 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I IA 'i I I I I I I I I 1 I I I NLN____! I o r I I I I I I � I I I Ii i I I i F v III I I I e•-e eie• t -�sk,• a.r roc Cameo. I„ IMSLZO rLoo� �L.at�t N0[I A2 WO • I'.p. O - Y w. „. y3 fr ,,; EIlly )-•.jar/-_'_--_-_ . .?' silll_-`ER Slow-iE I . 1-Y.•,I.1117' /f I• r :, \.� NBB'.35.03. =iJt n.... _ 1'�,55- _---_ -1.�1••- !. ��I!.., JN''�_ 1 ' I EE09L - 'It),IIL117r/1/'l• // ,'=-_ y/�� ^f R -I•Isb� i �W•j ;�. F -, _ R Z%rLOBS /Il{(/I/i////i/%�•'•�.�� _ - _ 1° '� r., �I ''� _ �Z 1i JR 7.0, l•e.,^'� ,A.,,TOR,,InL1l.M f III �iI��(I�f/ ' • `S \ ^• Rz IL.ti 'I`.'o HQ It PROJECT INFORMATION ele,, ;1 / J,;,,!,•,J.VIr' e,i;oji--b li Mt,” _ ;)." o �•.•' p"�1 "a!_ jONING/TVO mnr.TYPF• ;" 'I, L„,ka. ✓'�- ' a/,— —_:/;',Vt r'''' ,- , _ � l�' N•20NwG-lu(uEDIUY wDuSRBAt) ,'•/',l• "{ 3 ' "1 - j //'�l f ':• _ �; 4._ j •ZONING . i X tn.i. TYPE-SIN /. N• /% _—� = _ _ ,//I _ • ,II F TONWR AGENCY '' • •s.r_ CITY or RENTOJ-PLANNING DM510N •} / / ' • • •• • I-'t•' zW ulu AVENUE SOUTH � ,,At.-..--1r/ --s%'�-,:,ice '' .%� .F,,' 'a, � L .. .4.' l+ � - �z j' RENTON WA 98055 ' /f" �' J'/•i i%'�- b l.. ..,h .- •.. • • •b= gc e1:#5- 205/235-2500 .+Er _ / %'./�_ • --- ,`�.• _ �'^ ,. i�r�ee '9.•- , 1;9 - /..:+ O ]v ffTRAfI(S a / i _/,.:.r,•.?, RK...L7/8..• ' i'� F4., - ••!V I CURRENT SETBACK REOIRREUENTS SUBJECT TO SITE PLAN RENEW. CURRENT /✓! ''•'1.'••'1_%��/ !'.— 4 =.% , • +�'q I U W. SETBACKS MAI'DIFFER FROu THOSE IN EFFECT WRING DESCN/CONSTRUCTION �//'1•, /.N65/ /p - '� '•1� \ •,"~ / ' �Y OF EX15,NC INPROVENENTS. Y' . , O ••IYiI...•_ -F :• - /-1 11 •11/1 PROVIDED: FRONT-20'. SIDE-60'4W., REAR-1A0' . ,1///• /yy_ ;y lb • • _-__-_ NORM 0' •.'• !I - J • BN•A•,TOP.•G1R-J3.7f 1.a I I n ooD)oNF• �'1/�:9: y lri�� \, �'• ^,v- `' '• _ yTr OF RcirtaN .per I". I. MIS SITE COMMUNITY PANEL NO 5303JCW)6F,AND IS SITUATED W ZONE ''! / L /%: I - ' •X AREA DETERNINEU TO BE OUTSIDE THE 500 YEAR FLOW PWN AND ZONE I I!f 4/ , Q, Ali FLOOD DEPTHS OF 1 TO J FEET(USUALLY AREAS OF POVDING)BASE .((�� y __ _ dd FLOOD ELEVATIONS DEIERNWED 9 I I IE.+I1Ii `,,"�1 _ °�'c - , __ / NiRSTRUCTUREs • Irl':II 0•;�•.yl,.. • - _ _ _- ,�;' I ; I :. BURIED UTUTIES ARE SHOW AS INDICATED W RECORDS YAPS FURNISHED •I'I i I I�•`/r',1 Ir�-•-I I' - . sO,TI' I 1 BY OTHERS AND VERIFIED%MERE POSSIBLE BY FEATURES LOCATED IN THE I I I t X. j'r. i♦I„•4 • 190' • / I ECU DC ASSUUE NO LIABILITY FOR RYE ACCURACY a THOSE RECORDS I I, i/�'11 1k„'is�';1. ���� "/ -. ) - )':9 1 - .'I';;':: �•-; I 'FOR THE FINAL LOCATOI OF EXISTING UTILITIES IN AREAS CRITICAL TO I I I:1( r•.r, !F 1" Y4 -7.` _ .. PARCE=U A _ DESIGN CONTACT THE UTIUtt DINNER/AGENCY. Mr1..`1 I I, '"^�,.. 11 i�11i1 ', `�-_-'' _Y_. ,•... 1-xOAtYRAa- WL-I:;1:.•"�JS - / / t�I 1I 1Ii.IiI• J��/�/Ii;,;., 51�I i .A / A -• (_ N. i-1. - 1 60F/RRPI ONG SQUARE FOOTAF:F• .11i1� 1,IYiIIiiIR!:111i1•Ir��,•:]/� jt__ a ,r'RmuEMN/ti.� e \ ,,S - 1I TOTAL S1E SQUARE FOOTAGE-309.997 50/Fi ().l2 ACRES) �'j,III II �1. t{ \`:,F d • �• ��1 ` \ _ -• _ I/.- , BUILDING SW ARE FOTTAGE /. ;.111T141),11101 F}II ,I III111 I RAT/E� �' '`�;..`1RU Nt.. - - I ',11 I a `//f11'�1(141)1,III, { `: r.l ,1\\ PRODUCTION SQUARE FOOTAGE 29,965 SO/FT ./i, i' (I Irli!CI, 111 i�'•: , - - ! r `q E'Bess WAREHOUSE SQUARE FOOTAGE-66.103 SO/Fi ,I�il,��I'I, :,� .�° / /:- _, y f OFFICE SW ARE FOOTAGE- S,OW SOFT i \ \.l' /%� IP TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE. 101,068 SO T I'r',°�' 't�\\\\`I'n.�.'d; - _ N�1"�, ,.T " C BUILDING FOOTPRINT SQUARE FOOTAGE 101,060 50/Fi '. i'II\''\ i 1' .' ` • s. • ' • • ,i n.}} a 1� OTF/@IIII0INC I OT FTKRAf.E PFRFFNTAFF J ,r;) + i 'r I•,••}\. �1 I1A. � f_T-_f+_ZQ7 �_ - I, ;'(� I �,I.' ?4 7'. BUILDING A3S 101.068 SO T N JE { PARKWC/LOAOINC-5)X(136.JI6 SO/FT) r•�/•','I''''I II I^IIIII la . Q• �s=_ iglikk 1 - T¢,5� :' TOTAL-77S(237,384 SO/FT TOTAL WPERVIQUS SURFACE) IIIx..F� {{�� j/ �,� ' -, L=845J'r�'- rI,'r = !: km, b/Z)/9E PARKING. _.4�'.I..,Y•��_•'\'�' %1.41_ \_ .:I.T.:. • , 000 /T1 I` r•_� e•� �_ ZI PRODUCTION/WAREHOUSE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED(1 PER 1,500 50/FT)-6A •i.2i(� ,'� ' ..,,,,,fib `\ � OR1C£PMKwG SPACES PEOIRRED{J-A]PER 1,W0 50/FT) . 5-2J 1,y �%%--_--�. �/' r•' ��� *a �,''.• ROTA!PARKING SPACES REOUIREO-)9-B) 41!1/ - - �,:•' � I 1 T HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES REWIRED -A ',?IRI•' , , ,, ~ `T `� COMPACT(B5'061 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED = J ''IIIiIIII I'I'!III II'-JN,.p.1!•:--•�•7; / _ �' ••`" `i�'S , • - STANDARD(9'•20')PARKING SPACES PROVIDED -100 �,,II,IIII I llliiur�_�//. - _�'- e� �.."��. r ,t•, 1 �� ' � �~ i°�, \ HANDICAPPED(9•%20•r PARKING SPACES PROVOS)- 5(ALL VAN ACCESSIBLE) 1!,.III 'I I;I II! ()/ - _ -~--" �.1r, 'r' •" • / F TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED-108 ryIIIiIgIi'Ii,. Ij�1?�i':�___. -� _• �-ir . �r •�-_�.\1 � Y '1110 A}JV ��_, - PARKING LOT I ANOSCAPING(PARKING SPACES/55) III:•I1 {Trr(1 {ilF/'`,IFS'\'� �- •"_?'_-1-- _•°\ \ LANDSCAPING REWWED(19,3083.O5)-965 50/FT c,i7T;Il,y}'•1I'NI! '',R`#'+Yr,;:',-' ,o- _' .`;•\ • '• "e " , - ..J LANDSCAPING PROVIDED-3.900 SOFT 1 Uil I"T R� �. 1,� - 7. iiiII yIl i 'i ;y�ty,;y '11',i ":: \ as�'w v. • c V1tJ CO o �IIIi�I!1'.ilii\li.1',.\t`•?d, �! rr'_r vr::_I. ...`,� 4.� m a�«Et ',j,,.,-r ` F q � •xn 9lx.Nx t o i �.�' :�..,•1 !'� ,.'R'I},.(' 'try'• ,,, afWj\. �b �, Rm11w Z d o`e I..'4'.,•11, iIi. .IN„=LP-°. .�.. J 90r _ y ..7F Iriat. '� 1 . //. 0 W ri.,:';"%.•` Yt METRO �� .I € }L;\\,\. `�• ` ) sc•1. lee \'. '; 1:�:•-1. 'T. ( D e.p 20 NOSE 9r / \ ,:," ."-`:;'1 `?>,....',t` N A' SITE �'LF41 1 ,� �' Al I• • A0' a1.O .. a,n 1..1.n. n.0• ..o..,uoon,. '- fm 1) E . Z I 1 1, l am om em am < m < r I. moi•�mi,. ° 'I°°° Z 0 - Z.. IIIIIIIIII Z 9 • 0 IIIIIIIIII . " IIIIIIIIII • . lillllllll z9 hilt.. ..I ° ° m.r ] m. Illlllllll 4 k v., TMp T1, 9-\ 4 lillllllll % IIIIIIIIII • • _= 0 • • • ' ZE 0 • • • O ° I 0 T E 0: CO . `r �[ O O . T. • 0 1 ot, ,.o-.� T g Opus Northwest LLC o H BL Yc a x�t• Cascade Alrgec T A � ;; y W :m8ms Bulldln Elevations - _ '•"' Opus Northwest,LLC Q CIVIL as STRUCTURAL _ENGINEER S•PL ANNE R S . ]00-��]in.r•mW xE SNP•}0! W. 0l00] .]!.J!]]00 x•.bbn W� 0•i• • ' "' , , •: . -. } `7-----h-- — , — —,—, — -,— ___ . }) T i >, i i I 0 isi) 0 4 I I�III�I i i r i 1 i JC'-C' j p j i K z a -r .D_--- I o� I E I ,'E E ` I I I I ° I I I I E i 4 I I I c I I I 4 I I E S I I • E i - - - - - - r - - - - - -� i I I E I I 4 i I I I E i I E6, ____ rg m� I I i I I , -r - - - - -- i -O I i i i e i i i i -T m 0. I I E I I 4 I I I I I $l I o I gg a11 6 r Opus Northwest LLC A ;; H N msm Floor PI_en__ g A ZAHBL , :: ❑ °ein1 Opus Northr• C - _ CIVIL a STRUCTURAL '" 0S:oo-�m"e..w.ns. au.:». a.n.....w, us n0O ENCINEERS�PLANNERS ie 1 voi.m" o.n „> CITY. OF RENTON ;aim 711114447. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 10, 1998 Mr. Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest LLC 200- 112th Avenue NE, Suite 205 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: Upper Monster Road Warehouse Project No. LUA-97-164,SA-H,V-H,ECF Dear Mr. Pecsok: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's(ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated or Determination of Non- Significance for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. As you know, a Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on February 17, 1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425) 277-6186. For the Environmental Review Committee, C:2) .jar 41 -(4(fiL kfmAmi Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc: • B&G Renton Associates/Property Owners • FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 King County Wastewater Treatment Division Environmental Planning NN1N Department of Natural Resources 821 NT�� 821 Second Avenue crry p� R NTON Seattle,WA 98104-1598 FEB 09 1998 February 4, 1998 RECEIVED Ms. Jana Huerter Land Use Review Supervisor City of Renton Development Services Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Upper Monster Road Warehouse (LUA-97-164) Dear Ms..Huerter: The King County Wastewater Treatment Division has reviewed the proposed Upper Monster Road Warehouse project. The southerly entrance to the proposed project is located very close to the entrance to King County's East Section Reclamation Plant. • Section 14.f of the environmental checklist states that approximately 542 average weekday trips will be generated by the project. We are concerned about the additional traffic associated with the proposed project, and recommend that Monster Road be upgraded to current safety standards for lane width, and horizontal and vertical alignment. We support the recommendation in the City's Advisory Notes for the project, that a five-foot bicycle lane be added along Monster Road. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed project. Sinc-tely therine McKee, E vironment '1 Planner King County Wastewater Treatment Division' KM:ce G:KM-826 CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 8, 1997 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning /1/ FROM: Gail Reed,Airport Manager E n � 081997 SUBJECT: Upper Monster Road Warehouse(LUA-97-164) g;°�'44'6-Aur Reference your November 25 memorandum, same subject. ryV�R�V pNNING The reduction of the square footage requirement does not change my initial comments made November 17, 1997. cc: H:\W W6ODOINMEMO.DOT\bh M At TPA- 41110) CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: November 25, 1997 TO: Green Folder Reviewers FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning(X6186) SUBJECT: Upper Monster Road Warehouse(LUA-97-164, SA-H,ECF) The applicant has submitted new drawings which amend their application to add an alternate. A potential tenant has been found for the project, and their space requirements are less than indicated under the original project description. The alternate would feature a 101,068 square foot structure. Of this 29,965 square feet would be used for production, 66,103 square feet would be used as warehouse, and 5,000 square feet would be used for office. A total of 108 parking spaces would be provided. Landscaped areas would total 3,900 square feet. The drawings for the alternate are attached. Please revise your comments as necessary. Comments due: December 8, 1997. Thank you. cc: H:\W W6ODO11MEMO.DO11bh II r • ion De artment of Plannin /Buildin /Plh .rks tYP 9 9 ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: AlArrovrt COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 20, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 06, 1997 APPLICANT: Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: Upper Monster Road Warehouse WORK ORDER NO: 78303 LOCATION: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW SITE AREA: 7.11 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A BUILDING AREA(new): 111,000 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Roger Pecsok of Opus Northwest, proposes to develop a 111,000 square foot Warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public heanng to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four(4) on-grade truck doors. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 1ES 14,000 Feet No B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • The proposed project does not appear to pose any impact upon the Renton Municipal Airport. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS The proposed project does not appear to pose any impact upon the Renton Municipal Airport. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas where ad..;•nal inform•'•is needed to properly assess this proposal. i of .14) \thLt0101-0.4. IT, tfll Signature• 'erector or Authorized Representative • Date DEVAPP.•• Rev.10/93 41) . Washington State - Northwest Region •, Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North • P.O. Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440 40CDEVELOPMENT PLANIti JG CITY OF RENTON FEB• 06 1998 DATE: January 28, 1998 RE TO: City of Renton, Project Manager CEIVE® 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA 98055 • Subject: SR 405 MP 0.60 CS 1743 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-Upper Monster Road Warehouse File No.LUA-97-164,SA-H-V,ECF FROM: Robert A. Josephson, PE, Manager of Planning & Local- . Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project, which is located in the 1200 block of Monster Road SW. Our response is below: - • The State recommendeds that'a traffic study be prepared to analyze the state intersections that are impacted by ten or momof the projects peak hour trips and also determine what mitigation measures, if any,would be required. If you have any questions,please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name I , • • ............... ................... .. vei On'the 23— day of lawn , 199r, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ECG deervAt fts • documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT • KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources • Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe • Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe • Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy • • .(Signature of Sender) 9fUydo".'L . cr • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS COUNTY OF KING, ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that SA Ac � 9f. Soi,i1b, signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act foothe uses and purposes mentioned in the.instrument. Iggg0- Notary Public�fn and for the State of W ington • Notary (Print) wAARII Th 1lAMCHEr.F_ - My appointment•e � : GOMMibsiON EXPIRES 6/29/99 Project Name: ueper mapsixer lead tovreinot t.St • Project Number: LUA•ct-t , 1b4,SA-0,, V, E(F NOTARY.DCC CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor - Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 21, 1998 . Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)on January 20, 1998: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164,SA-H,V-H,EC F The applicant, Roger Pecsok of Opus Northwest, proposes to develop a 111,000 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four(4)on-grade truck doors. An alternate is also being proposed. The alternate would feature a 101,068 s.f. building and parking for 108 vehicles. The project would include seventeen(17)dock-high doors and one(1)grade-level door. The proposed project and alternate require environmental review, site plan approval(Hearing Examiner)and a variance from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance(Code Section 4-9)to clear areas where the slope is in excess of 40%. Location: 1200 block of Monster Road SW. • ' Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 9, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is notsufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period,then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the.Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 9, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. 'Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)235-2501. If you have questions, please call me at(425)277-6186. For t Environ ntal Review Committee, , troL.Vamp An_r i er tit)Henning Project Manager cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources • Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy AGNCYLTR.DOC\ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 . -__. - . • ---.- . . 4; CITX JF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 22, 1998 Mr. Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest LLC 200- 112th Avenue NE, Suite 205 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: Upper Monster Road Warehouse Project No. LUA-97-164,SA-H,V-H,ECF Dear Mr. Pecsok: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on January 20, 1998, issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 9, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the:environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South;Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period, then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action On the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the.Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination.'..The appeal process will then be.continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 9, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Healing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City.of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 235-2501. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on February 17. 1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do sp. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)277-6186. For the Environmen I Review Committee, ,lend' eK Toth H nning Project Manager cc: B&C Rcnton Associates/pro erty Owners Enclosure 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 N • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-164,SA-H,V-H,ECF APPLICANT: Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest, LLC PROJECT NAME: Upper Monster Road Warehouse DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to develop a 111,270 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four(4) on-grade truck doors. The applicant has also submitted an alternate site plan to be considered under this application. A potential end user has been identified, and their space requirements are less than the proposal. Therefore,the applicant is requesting review of a 101,068 square foot building. Of this 29,965 square feet would be use for production, 66,103 square feet would be used as warehouse, and 5,000 square feet would be,used for office. A total of 108 parking j. spaces are proposed. Landscaped areas would total 3,900 square feet. • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:,:• 1200 block of Monster Road SW LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton/Department of Planning/Building/Public Works/Development Planning Section MITIGATION MEASURES:' 1. a) The applicant shall:follow"the general recommendations of the geotechnical engineering report as prepared for the subject parcel (titled: Geotechnical Engineering Study and Abandoned Mine Assessment North 405 Upper and Lower Sites, Renton,.Washington) by Terra Associates, Inc. (dated December 17, 1997). - I b) If deep dynamic.compaction is.approved as a construction method for the site, then separate environmental review shall be required. In addition, additional studies and more extensive public notification will be required. 2. , a) In order to mitigate potential impacts to the local and regional roadway network, construction hauling should be limited to off-peak hours of 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. , b) The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee, at a rate of$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee, equal to $0.52 per square foot for new construction. The fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-164,SA-H,V-H,ECF APPLICANT: Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest, LLC PROJECT NAME: Upper Monster Road Warehouse DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to develop a 111,270 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four(4) on-grade truck doors. The applicant has also submitted an alternate site plan to be considered under this application. A potential end user has been identified, and their space requirements are less than the proposal. Therefore,the applicant is requesting review of a 101,068 square foot building. Of this 29,965,square feet would be use for production, 66,103 square feet would be used as warehouse, and 5,000 square feet would be used for office. A total of 108 parking spaces are proposed. Landscaped areas would total 3,900 square feet. • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1200 block of Monster Road SW LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton/Department of Planning/Building/Public Works/Development Planning Section • Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations: Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,250 gallons per minute (gpm).'Six fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and five fire hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. The fire mitigation fee is applicable at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of building. The fee is estimated to be $57,860.40 (111,270 s.f.x$0.52= $57,860.40). This fee is payable at the time that the building permit is issued. For the smaller building configuration,the fee would be adjusted accordingly. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout the structure. Separat plans and pemits are required for the sprinkler and fire alarm systems. 4. Applicant will be required to provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids, or hazardous chemicals to be used or stored in the building. 5. Fire department access is required to within 150-feet of all portions of the exterior of the building. Plan Review—Water 6. The site is served by a 12-inch water main in Monster Road SW,, anda 12-inch main in the city-held easement at the northeast comer of the site. Upper Monster Road Warehouse LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page2of2 7. New water main, additional fire hydrants and DDCV Assembly (building fire control system)will be required and must meet current Fire Codes/Regulations for fire protection of the proposed on-site building. Any new water mains,fire hydrants and DDCV vault located on private property will be required to be in easements that will be held by the City of Renton. 8. Water System Development Connection Charges of$0.113/square foot of gross site area will be required. - Plan Review-Storm Water 9. The drainage system and temporary erosion control for the site shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. Biofiltration will be required (since more than 5,000 square feet of new impervious surface subject to vehicular use is proposed to be constructed on the site. 10. The site will be required to pay surface water System Development Connection Charges of$0.129 - per square foot of new impervious surface installed by the project on site. Plan Review-Wastewater 11. The project will required new sewer main,and manholes with a new connection to the Metro main (per Metro requirements). New side sewer connection permits will be required with a permit cost of$100 per connection. Sanitary sewer(SDC)fees of$0.1078/square foot of gross site area will be required. Plan Review-Transportation 12. The development of the site will trigger the construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving, driveways and street lights to meet current city standards.';.The City's Trails Master Plan also indicates that a five-foot wide at-grade bicycle lane is required along Monster.Road. 13. A traffic mitigation fee of:$75 per each new average daily trip will be required. The fee is estimated to be approximately$40,26000 (536.8 new daily trips;x$75 = $40,260.00). The fee is due prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee would be adjusted accordingly with the alternate building size. Construction 14. All required occupancy separations are required. Soils report is required prior to building permit. Parks 15. Street trees and landscaping and irrigation:located outside the property boundary along Monster Road will be the responsibility of the owner to maintain. 16. An at grade, 5-foot wide bicycle land is recommended along Monster Road as identified in the Renton Trails Master Plan. Wetlands • 17. The wetland report indicates that the wetland appears to meet the minimum criteria to be considered a jurisdictional wetland by the US Army Corps of Engineers (US ACOE). Any development that may affect the wetland would likely require authorization form the US ACOE. The applicant is advised to obtain separate approvals/permitsas applicable. General j 18. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 19. The applicant is required to provide a total of 2% of the site area as habitat landscaping per the City's agreement with the US Soil Conservation Service - CITY OF RENTON • DE1 J MINATION OF NON-SIGNIFicANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF) V-f' APPLICANT: Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest, LLC PROJECT NAME: Upper Monster Road Warehouse DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Roger Pecsok of Opus Northwest, proposes to develop a 111,000 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock- high truck doors and four (4) on-grade truck doors. An alternate is also being proposed. The alternate would feature a 101,068 s.f. building and parking for 108 vehicles. The project would include seventeen (17) dock-high doors and one (1) grade-level door. The proposed project and alternate require environmental review, site plan approval (Hearing Examiner) and a variance from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance (Code Section 4-9) to clear areas where the slope is in excess of 40%. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1200 block of Monster Road SW LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton/Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 9, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension'of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review. Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period, then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 9, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 235-2501. PUBLICATION DATE: January: ;'199$ DATE OF DECISION: ,TLt44.,;20 199Z SIGN TURFS: - WA,t it 1 .e/1 1 /z0/1/ z( 3I/6 re Z I erma , dministrator DATE Departm n of Planning/Building/Public Works Sam Chastain, Administrator DATE77-1)(cir s- Corn un:r rvice Depa ent ----- - — — / / -( X)"--pr Le eeler, ire hid DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-164,SA-H,V-H,ECF APPLICANT: - Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest, LLC PROJECT NAME: Upper Monster Road Warehouse DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to develop a 111,270 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four(4) on-grade truck doors. The applicant has also submitted an alternate site plan to be considered under this application. A potential end user has been identified, and their space requirements are less than the proposal::Therefore,the applicant is requesting review of a 101,068 square foot building. Of this 29,965 square'feet would be use for production, 66,103 square feet would be used as warehouse, and 5,000,square feet would be:used:for office. A total of 108 parking - spaces are proposed: Landscaped areas would total 3,900 square feet. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL 1200 block of Monster Road SW: LEAD AGENCY: _ City of Renton/Department of Planning/Building/Public Works/Development Planning Section MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. a) The applicant shall follow:the general recommendations of the geotechnical engineenng report as prepared for the subject parcel (titled: Geotechnical Engineering"Study and Abandoned Mine Assessment North 405 Upper and Lower Sites, Renton, Washington) by Terra Associates, Inc. (dated December 17, 1997). • b) If deep dynamic compaction is approved as a construction method for the • site, then separate environmental review shall be required. In addition, additional studies and more extensive public notification will be required. 2. a) In order to mitigate potential impacts to the local and regional roadway network, construction hauling should be limited to off-peak hours of 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. b) The'applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee, at a rate of$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project..The fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3.. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee, equal to $0.52 per square foot for new construction. The fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-164,SA-H,V-H,ECF APPLICANT: Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest, LLC PROJECT NAME: Upper Monster Road Warehouse DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to develop a 111,270 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four(4) on-grade truck doors. The applicant has also submitted an alternate site plan to be considered under this application. A potential end user has been identified, and their space requirements are less than the proposal. Therefore,the applicant is requesting review of a 101,068 square foot building..Of this 29,965 square feet would be use for production, 66,103 square feet would be used as warehouse, and 5,000 square feet would be used for office. A total of 108 parking spaces are proposed. Landscaped areas would total 3,900 square feet. • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: ; ` 1200 block of Monster.Road SW LEAD AGENCY: . City of Renton/Department of Planning/Building/Public Works/Development Planning Section Advisory Notes to Applicant The following notes are supplemental information providedin conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal - process for environmental determinations: Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,250 gallons per minute (gpm). Six fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and five fire hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. The fire mitigation fee is applicable at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of building. The fee is estimated to be $57,860.40 (111,270 s.f.x$0.52= $57,860.40). This fee is payable at the time that the building permit is issued. For the smaller building configuration,the fee would be adjusted accordingly. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout the structure. Separat plans and pemits are required for the sprinkler and fire alarm systems. 4. Applicant will be required to provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids, or hazardous • chemicals to be used or stored in the building. 5. Fire department access is required to within 150-feet of all portions of the exterior of the building. Plan Review—Water . 6. The site is served by a 12-inch water main in Monster Road SW, and a 12-inch main in the city-held easement at the northeast corner of the site: Upper Monster Road Warehouse LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page2of2 7. New water main, additional fire hydrants and DDCV Assembly (building fire control system)will be required and must meet current Fire Codes/Regulations for fire protection of the proposed on-site building. Any new water mains, fire hydrants and DDCV vault located on private property will be required to be in easements that will be held by the City of Renton. 8. Water System Development Connection Charges of$0.113/square foot of gross site area will be required. Plan Review-Storm Water 9. The drainage system and temporary erosion control for the site shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. Biofiltration will be required (since more than 5,000 square feet of new impervious surface subject to vehicular use is proposed to be constructed on the site. 10. The site will be required to pay surface water System Development Connection Charges of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface installed by the project on site. - Plan Review-Wastewater 11. The project will required new sewer main and manholes with a new connection to the Metro main (per Metro requirements). New side sewer;connection permits will be required with a permit cost of$100 per connection. Sanitary sewer(SDC)fees of$0.1078/square..foot of gross site area will be required. •Plan Review-Transportation 12. The development of the site will trigger the construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving, driveways and street lights to meet current city standards. The City's Trails Master Plan also indicates that a five-foot wide at-grade bicycle lane is required along Monster Road. 13. A traffic mitigation fee of$75 per each new average daily trip will be required. The fee is estimated to be approximately$40,260.00 (536.8 new daily trips is$75 = $40,260.00). The fee is due prior to the issuance of building permits.,The fee would be adjusted accordingly with the alternate building size. Construction 14. All required occupancy separations are required. Soils report is required prior to building permit. Parks 15. Street trees and landscaping and irrigation located outside the property boundary along Monster Road will be the responsibility of the owner to maintain.. ...: 16. An at grade, 5-foot wide bicycle land is recommended along Monster Road as identified in the Renton Trails Master Plan. Wetlands 17. The wetland report indicates that the wetland appears to meet the minimum criteria to be considered a jurisdictional wetland by the US Army Corps of Engineers (US ACOE). Any development that may affect the wetland would likely require authorization form the US ACOE. The applicant is advised to obtain separate approvals/permits as applicable. General " 18. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 19. The applicant is required to provide a total of 2% of the site area as habitat landscaping per the City's agreement with the US Soil Conservation Service NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE L UA-97-164,SA-H,V-H,EC F Proposal to develop a warehouse and office facility. Project requires environmental review, and public hearing to consider the site plan and variance from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance. Location: 1200 block of Monster Rd. SW. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on February 9, 1998. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on February 17, 1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Publication Date: January 26, 1998 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot • • • • - • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-164,SA44,V-H,ECF The'applicant,Roger Pecsak of Opus Northwest,proposes to develop a 111,000 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site.The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to • consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles.would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four(4)on-grade truck doors. An allemate Is also being proposed. The alternate would feature a 101,068 s.f.building and parking for 108 vehicles. The project would include seventeen(17)dock-high doors and one(1)grade-level door. The proposed project and alternate require environmental review,site plan approval(Hearing Examiner)and a variance tram the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance(Code Section 4-9)to clear areas where the slope Is In excess of 40%.Location:1200 block of Monster Road SW. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Comments regarding the environmental deternlnaean must be Bled In writing on or before 5:00 PM February 9, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental detemdnallon of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or lad,error In judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.Aftor.review of the comments,if Environmental Review Committee finds there Is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day limeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter,Land Use Review Supervisor,City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue-South,Renton,WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period,then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be i notified that the appeal is an hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request.The City will notify the appellantperson requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner In writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal.Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 6:00 PM February 9,1998.'Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required 575.00 application lee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)235-2501. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting In the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall,Renton,Washington,on FEBRUARY 17.1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval and Variance.If the Environmental Determination Is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. /. '�• \ -'-. • P-1, l';.... • • ``j•`':: i co FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)277-6186. ' DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification: •' -CERTIFICATION - - I, {1(1t ) , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on JGt,r►titart) 21Q 1r1q c_, • Signed: Sao ilYVVVvvvt4 ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in9 e -6-en , on the c 1' . day of /44 , • r (AV' MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 ! - ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-164,SA-H,V-H,ECF The applicant,Roger Pecsok of Opus Northwest, proposes to develop a.111,000 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four (4) on-grade truck doors. An alternate is also being proposed. The alternate would feature a 101,068 s.f. building and parking for 108 vehicles. The project would include seventeen (17) dock-high doors and one (1) grade-level door. The proposed project and alternate require environmental review, site plan approval (Hearing Examiner) and a variance from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance(Code Section 4-9)to clear areas where the slope is in excess of 40%. Location: 1200 block of Monster Road SW. 1 THE CITY OF RENTON .ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 9, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there wilt be no further extension of the'appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor,City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South;Renton,WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period,then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 9,1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)235-2501. A ublic Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington, on FEBRUARY 17. 1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval and Variance. If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. i•;.'•1,w °\\� I-A (!,_ • 4, 1. •: - 'i••:I 1 I—'•1 :io\l':'?''‘ "".'"V.• ' -'S :\NIT ill ,:II---i —11:t /J/ � I) \ tsOR ( rt. RS .: I 1MD - • __C LI ,,.. / `NnaN " \ n j <,� '� fo-,\ ..* ., , co • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)277-6186. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION : :i _.;�.:< ;:i:o a Or .O tiiliildentifi0Wi;< <`'"": <>: :<:::;:::Pleas .ar~clutle.the:prn�ect:.NUMBERrnrhrlcall�n .f.. <<pr>..per. : <:,.::.: ::;::::.:::.:<:::: < .• ::• i. STAFF ,City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE January 20, 1998 Project Name - Upper Monster Road Warehouse Applicant Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest, LLC 200 112th Avenue NE, Suite 205 Bellevue, WA 98004 I File Number LUA-097-164,SA-H,V-H,ECF Project Manager Jennifer Toth Henning . . , \, _.,1;.7. ,�F tee ,-/ --F.. i \ l !% �•T'' s . '1 1 roll \/ e N 0 %j/‘. ' .1\.�.s 20 I -- .. • G !.M1 j i 21 IS .+ e„. .•1 zl . - '. ■-a•'..i 'R•. _MI I. O 1 \ �`._:: . ��w .' +y^�iy"" W A S N'1•N G 1 D N T F C N t•r h • �l` 7 t�Ur�'9_p7 e'er•!'•'. ` 1,...vi�:r=-,; I" A� A S H I N•.G T:0 • ISl 21 'oti.7` y� , CENTER \ nl 1 1, ',fir` '.�-- %� -'V'y .IL' • 0, P • 't. Y"IC: c..ttetf .i. — I3IOA ( . �__ T[_N_c.t .NrE _—___ 11 \ . ' '.... � "_ earwo r :: Rc w it t `_. - .� r • ,..}:Y d���F'pO.\T, F 01 IR T• • 3 .�,p,1 �_ 1' `' J 1 P.s.I te'11i» I t` t • \ .•-:40 I. ,' %...- --G.,„„0, WR/PRo -4 ; i .,.. 4 i........, ,,,,,.:.,._.....,,L, . : ...i,, ��wir ��^ 0 a i" • .:,,.•..yam,--. • �1\ 7 _ •:� y 14 _l•:..- r'"v.(..:'�rr`w[:r 1 tot 6 p 'I� ' S. is Sr• • Z R' Sri- _'''''''''''k'3!...:.\ �,0+�' I' „:„e lj� .,,,..y.:::,;)`..:,• � .y J•� I. . +r " Project Location Map ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PWDepartment onmental Review Committee Staff Report UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUac" - LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJANUARY20,1998 Page2 of 10 Project Description The applicant proposes to develop a 111,270 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four(4) on-grade truck doors. The applicant has also submitted an alternate site plan to be considered under this application. A potential end user has been identified, and their space requirements are less than for the proposal. Therefore, the applicant is requesting review of a 101,068 square foot building. Of this, 29,965 square feet would be used for production, 66,103 square feet would be used as warehouse, and 5,000 square feet would be used for office. A total of 108 parking spaces, 1 on-grade truck door, and 17 dock-high truck doors are proposed. Landscaped areas would total 3,900 square feet. The proposed project and alternate require environmental review, site plan approval (Hearing Examiner) and a variance from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance (Code Section 4-9)to clear areas where the slope is in excess of 40%. The Environmental Review Committee tabled the application on December 9, 1997 pending the receipt of additional information regarding potential coal mining hazards on the site. An additional geotechnical engineering study and abandoned mine assessment were provided to staff on December 19, 1997. The geotechnical engineering study, by Terra Associates, Inc. and Golder Associates, Inc. states that previous mining for coal occurred on the western portion of the site. ERC considered the new information for the Upper Monster Road Warehouse site on December 30, 1997, and again tabled the project in order to request information from the applicant regarding construction techniques described in the revised geotechnical studies. Specifically, the proposal for deep dynamic compaction (DDC) to consolidate soils and compact undocumented mine workings in areas of known or suspected coal mine features would needed further explanation. In addition, the ERC requested revised calculations for the quantity of cut and fill material on the site, if overexcavation is the construction method used instead of DDC. The applicant has provided information stating that approximately the cut volume for the Upper Monster Road site would be 47,805 cubic yards, the amount of fill material would be 42,373 cubic yards; and 11,112 c.y. of material would be stripped. The applicant has stated that the cut and fill on the site would be balanced except for approximately 5,000 cubic yards of the topsoil layer which would be exported. Balancing would be achieved by raising the finished floor elevation of the building to 76 fee. Project Location 1200 Block of Monster Road SW Exist. Bldg. Area gsf N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf 111,270 s.f or 101,068 s.f. (alternate) Site Area 7.11 acres Total Building Area gsf 111,270 s.f. or 101,068 s.f. (alternate) RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated. • ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment ronmental Review Committee Staff Report UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUitt LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJANUARY20,1998 Page3 of10 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF X DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. a) The applicant shall follow the general recommendations of the geotechnical engineering report as prepared for the subject parcel (titled: Geotechnical Engineering Study and Abandoned Mine Assessment North 405 Upper and Lower Sites, Renton, Washington) by Terra Associates, Inc. (dated December 17, 1997). b) If deep dynamic compaction is approved as a construction method for the site, then separate environmental review shall be required. In addition, additional studies and more extensive public notification will be required. 2. a) In order to mitigate potential impacts to the local and regional roadway network, construction hauling should be limited to off-peak hours of 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. b) The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee, at a rate of$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee, equal to $0.52 per square foot for new construction. The fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,250 gallons per minute (gpm). Six fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and five fire hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. The fire mitigation fee is applicable at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of building. The fee is estimated to be $57,860.40 (111,270 s.f. x$0.52 = $57,860.40). This fee is payable at the time that the building permit is issued. For the smaller building configuration, the fee would be adjusted accordingly. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout the structure. Separate plans and permits are required for the sprinkler and fire alarm systems. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDeparlment ronmental Review Committee Staff Report UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSc LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 20,1998 Page4 of 10 4. Applicant will be required to provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids, or hazardous chemicals to be used or stored in the building. 5. Fire department access is required to within 150-feet of all portions of the exterior of the building. Plan Review--Water 6. The site is served by a 12-inch water main in Monster Road SW, and a 12-inch main in the city-held easement at the northeast corner of the site. 7. New water main, additional fire hydrants and DDCV Assembly (building fire control system) will be required and must meet current Fire Codes/Regulations for fire protection of the proposed on-site building. Any new water mains, fire hydrants and DDCV vault located on private property will be required to be in easements that will be held by the City of Renton. 8. Water System Development Connection Charges of$0.113/square foot of gross site area will be required. Plan Review- Storm Water 9. The drainage system and temporary erosion control for the site shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. Biofiltration will be required (since more than 5,000 square feet of new impervious surface subject to vehicular use is proposed to be constructed on the site. 10. The site will be required to pay surface water System Development Connection Charges of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface installed by the project on site. Plan Review-Wastewater 11. The project will required new sewer main and manholes with a new connection to the Metro main (per Metro requirements). New side sewer connection permits will be required with a permit cost of$100 per connection. Sanitary sewer(SDC) fees of$0.1078/square foot of gross site area will be required. Plan Review-Transportation 12. The development of the site will trigger the construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving, driveways and street lights to meet current city standards. The City's Trails Master Plan also indicates that a five-foot wide at-grade bicycle lane is required along Monster Road. 13. A traffic mitigation fee of$75 per each new average daily trip will be required. The fee is estimated to be approximately$40,260.00 (536.8 new daily trips x$75 = $40,260.00). The fee is due prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee would be adjusted accordingly with the alternate building size. Construction 14. All required occupancy separations are required. Soils report is required prior to building permit. Parks 15. Street trees and landscaping and irrigation located outside the property boundary along Monster Road will be the responsibility of the owner to maintain. 16. An at grade, 5-foot wide bicycle land is recommended along Monster Road as identified in the Renton Trails Master Plan. Wetlands 17. The wetland report indicates that the wetland appears to meet the minimum criteria to be considered a jurisdictional wetland by the US Army Corps of Engineers (US ACOE). Any development that may affect the wetland would likely require authorization form the US ACOE. The applicant is advised to obtain separate approvals/permits as applicable. ERCRPT.DOC cityof Renton PB/PWDepartment ronmental Review Committee Staff Report UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 20,1998 PageS of 10 General 18. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 19. The applicant is required to provide a total of 2% of the site area as habitat landscaping per the City's agreement with the US Soil Conservation Service D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. ' Has the applicant adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? (1) Earth Impacts: The subject site is surrounded by steep slopes on the west, north, and south. The applicant has indicated that the quantity of grade/fill to be accomplished on site to create a level building pad and circulation area is approximately: 47,805 cubic yards as cut volume, 42,373 c.y. as fill volume, and 11,112 c.y. of topsoils to be stripped. Of this, approximately 5,000 c.y. would be exported off site. A preliminary geotechnical study by Terra Associates, Inc. was submitted with the project application. The report noted the presence of the steep slopes, and weathered siltstone and sandstone on the property. Also, evidence of coal mine shafts was documented on the site. The geotechnical study concluded that development of the site was probably feasible provided that recommendations of the geotechnical consultant are followed. The Environmental Review Committee tabled consideration of the application pending the receipt of additional information regarding the mining hazards. The completed geotechnical engineering study and abandoned mine assessment were provided to staff on December 19, 1997 and that information has been merged into this report. The geotechnical engineering study, by Terra Associates, Inc. states that previous mining for coal occurred predominantly on the western portion of the site. Technical information by Golder Associates indicates that the underground workings located on the subject site were probably part of the Black River mine, which has recorded production during the 1890's. Another abandoned mine, the Diamond Mine is located to the east of Monster Road, and was worked from 1927 until 1931, producing approximately 6,000 tons of coal. Additional un-recorded coal production occurred later as evidenced in historic aerial photographs and the condition of on-site workings. The geotechnical study indicates that the mining that occurred removed a relatively shallow coal seam residing approximately 10 to 14 feet below the existing surface grades using surface mining techniques. A mine opening was observed at a depth of about 8 to 14 feet below existing surface grades. This trench is probably remnants of the 207-foot long Black River Mine slope. There was speculation that the potential for a second lower seam also exists at the site. Additional testing during December 1997 to a depth of 59 feet revealed no such second lower seam. However, remnants of a mine tunnel in the form of timber and coal debris was encountered at a depth of about 20 feet. The report concludes that there are undocumented mine workings which extend from the southwest to the northeast along ERCRPT.DOC City of RentonPB/PWDepartment ronmental Review Committee Staff Report UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 20,1998 Page6 of 10 the western boundary of the site. These workings are likely abandoned prospects and exist at a relatively shallow depth of 20 to 25 feet below existing site grade (Elevation 45 to 55). There is a risk that these relatively shallow tunnels could collapse, resulting in surface sink holes if not mitigated. The risk would be present along the parking and drive areas west of the proposed structure as well as the extreme northwest corner of the proposed building. Proposed grading on the site, especially in the central and southern portions would require excavations of 14 to 30 feet below existing surface grades. Excavation depths are equal to or extend below previously mined depths at the site. In order to mitigate the risk posed by undocumented mine workings below this area of the site, the geotechnical report recommends that this area also be overexcavated to a minimum depth of 20 feet below current site grade, then restored with suitable compacted structural fill. Or, alternatively, the geotechnical report suggests that deep dynamic compaction could be used to consolidate the soils and collapse any undocumented mine workings. (Deep dynamic compaction consists of dropping a heavy weight generally on the order of 6 to 10 tons using a large crane, from a height of about 30 to 50 feet. The weight is dropped at the same location 5 to 10 times to consolidate loose fills at depth.) This option would have greater environmental impacts and could affect a City 12-inch water line and Metro facilities in the area. If this were a preferred method of mitigation for the coal mine features, then additional environmental evaluation may be necessary. The applicant has stated that they plan to use the deep dynamic compaction (DDC) technique to consolidate and compact soils in the vicinity of the coal mine features. Terra Associates Inc. provided additional information regarding this technique in response to the ERC and King County/Metro request. The basic technique is described above, supplemental information states that the weight is dropped from a maximum height of 50 feet, and is dropped in a grid pattern with center to center spacing between drop points of about ten feet. The DDC process results in the development of large craters at the ground surface which will require filling and compaction using normal construction techniques. The impact of the weight would also generate ground vibrations and sound waves, the level of which is dependent upon the magnitude of the weight and height of the drop. The consultants have provided information on ground vibrations and sound decibel levels based on previous use of this compaction technique. In addition, information is provided regarding recommendations from the Bureau of Mines stating that a particle velocity of one inch per second or less was recommended as a safe level to avoid damage to existing adjacent structures. Both King County/Metro and City of Renton have existing utilities on or adjacent to the site. Metro's utilities consist of a 96-inch diameter concrete cylinder pipe used to transport effluent form the treatment plant east of Monster Road, and two ductile iron force mains, 16-inches to 24-inches in diameter. These utilities would be at least 450 feet from the area where DDC would be applied. No adverse affect to these facilities would result. Conversations with King County staff in the Wastewater Treatment Division have confirmed that they concur with the Terra Associates assumption of no adverse impacts to facilities based on distance from the DDC activity area. A 12-inch city water line is located along the northern boundary of the subject site. The line is within 10 to 15 feet of the DDC area and could be impacted by ground motion generated with this construction technique. The consultants have recommended that an isolation trench be excavated between the DDC areas and the water line to prevent or disrupt ground wave propagation in this direction. City Water Utility staff have recommended that ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment ronmental Review Committee Staff Report UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUaji LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 20,1998 Page7 of 10 in addition to the isolation trench, the applicant provide calculations and in order to demonstrate the ground vibration would occur, and how the water main would be protected. An independent analysis of the calculations may be required by a consultant selected by the City and reimbursement from the applicant for this analysis. In addition, the Water Utility is recommending that a pre-test of the water line be conducted prior to DDC, then a pressure test on the line following completion of the DDC, and a second pressure test approximately 6 months following the completion of DDC activity on the site. These tests are recommended to avoid the possibility of compromising the integrity of the water line. Ground vibration can result in water line leaks that may not be present until several months after the activity. Furthermore, is this construction method is used, the Water Utility may require that the applicant install an additional water valve in the line in order to isolate and shut down a section of the water line during the DDC activity. The geotechnical engineering report states that there does not appear to be any geotechnical constraints which would preclude development of the sites as proposed. However, mitigation to eliminate the hazard associated with previous mining activity would be necessary on the western portion of the property. The mitigation is recommended to occur concurrent with the start of the site grading activities. Since extensive excavation is required on the site to achieve the desired construction grades, the geotechnical report recommends that mass grading activities at the site occur only during the drier months (June through October). In addition, the grading contractor should be prepared to use hard rock excavating techniques, such as ripper claws and hard formation, teeth to achieve the desired construction elevations. Additional recommendations include: finishing grades to an inclination of no greater than 2:1 for fill embankments; keying and benching fill into native subgrade on existing slope gradients in excess of 20%; compacting and vegetating slopes to reduce/prevent erosion; controlling surface water runoff over the crest of the slope or on the slope face. The report states that the building may be supported on conventional spread foundations or on structural fills. Slabs-on-grade may be supported on the subgrade. In order to diminish the potential for erosion and to control sedimentation during clearing, grading and construction, the applicant would be required to provide acceptable Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plans to the City, prior to the issuance of any construction permits. This is a Code item and does not require further mitigation. Mitigation Measures: a) The applicant shall follow the general recommendations of the geotechnical engineering report as prepared for the subject parcel (titled: Geotechnical Engineering Study and Abandoned Mine Assessment North 405 Upper and Lower Sites, Renton, Washington) by Terra Associates, Inc. (dated December 17, 1997). b) If deep dynamic compaction is approved as a construction method for the site, then separate environmental review shall be required. In addition, additional studies and more extensive public notification will be required. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance, SEPA (2) Air Impacts: Impacts to air quality can be anticipated to occur during construction and after occupancy of the proposed project. Impacts during construction would include increased ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department 'ronmental Review Committee Staff Report UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 20,1998 Page8 of 10 levels of airborne particulate (especially dust) from the disturbance of exposed soils. Construction impacts would be short term in nature and would be mitigated through best management practices of the required Temporary Erosion Control/Sedimentation Control Plan and with the Construction Mitigation Plan. Emissions from construction vehicles is regulated by State and City Codes. After construction, the impacts would be associated primarily with vehicle exhaust from resident traffic. Vehicle emissions are regulated by the State of Washington. Overall air impacts would be relatively minor in nature and would not be considered to warrant additional mitigation measures. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: N/A (3) Storm Water Impacts: Stormwater runoff currently generated by the undeveloped site flows into a recently constructed regional detention facility located northwest of the parcel (Plumbers and Pipefitters Trust). Post-development drainage will be collected by an on-site storm sewer. The runoff generated by the impervious driving surface will be conveyed to a structure where the two-year peak flow will be directed to a biofiltration swale on the west boundary of the site for treatment (between the southwest edge of the wetland buffer and the BN railroad tracks). All flows greater than the two-year peak flow and stormwater runoff collected by the roof drains will be conveyed to the regional detention facility, and will not be treated prior to conveyance. King County Surface Water Design Manual does not require treatment of stormwater runoff for flows greater than the two-year peak flow and flow not generated by or crossing impervious driving surfaces. No detention or retention is being provided as part of the development of this site. It appears that the proposal meets or exceeds the City's standards for stormwater. No additional mitigation is required. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: N/A (4) Transportation Impacts: The proposed project for a warehouse development would generate additional traffic in the area both during construction and operation of the facility. The applicant has estimated that approximately 5,000 cubic yards of material would be exported off site as part of the project. This would result in up to 250 round-trip truck trips to export excavated material off-site. The trips would be expected to occur during the drier months (April through October). In order to mitigate potential impacts to the local and regional roadway network, hauling should be limited to off-peak hours of 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. The applicant will be required to submit a construction mitigation plan indicating measures to control dust, mud, and traffic. The construction mitigation plan is a City-Code requirement and further mitigation would not be required. The applicant has estimated that construction would begin upon the granting of permits, and that construction would last approximately six months. Primary access for construction vehicles would be from Monster Road SW, Oakesdale Avenue, and Grady Way, to 1-405. Operation of the site would result in approximately 747.45 new average daily trips, based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual for warehouse use. ERCRPT.DOC City of RentonPB/PWDepartment rronmental Review Committee Staff Report UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOL— LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 20,1998 Page9 of10 The new average daily trips are subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee, which is charged at the rate of $75 per each new average daily trip. The fee is estimated to be $40,260.00 and is calculated based on the size (in square feet) of the building. This fee would need to be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Mitigation Measures: a) In order to mitigate potential impacts to the local and regional roadway network, construction hauling should be limited to off-peak hours of 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. b) The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee, at a rate of $75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA), Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution, and adopting ordinance. • (5) Fire Protection Impacts: The proposal would result in the construction of a new building in the City, which would be served by the Renton Fire Department in the event of an emergency. New construction impacts the City's ability to serve all of its citizens, and increases the need for new equipment, facilities, and fire fighters. A Fire Mitigation Fee applies to all new construction in the City, and is determined at the rate of $0.52 per square feet of building for this type of proposed use. The fee is payable prior to issuance of a building permit. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee, equal to $0.52 per square foot for new construction. The fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Policy Nexus: N/A E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental / Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 9, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period, then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. ERCRPT.DOC .City of Renton PB/PWDepartment ironmental Review Committee Staff Report UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 20,1998 Pagel0 of10 Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 9, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 235-2501. i y ERCRPT.DOC n^.is Northwest LLC -112th Avenue NE OPUS® Suite 205 Bellevue,Washington 98004 425-453-4100 Fax 425-453-1712 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON January 21, 1998 JAN 2 6 1998 Jennifer Toth Henning RECEIVED Senior Planner Development Services Municipal Bldg. 3`d Floor Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Permit Application LUA-97-164, SA-A, ECF North 405-Lower Site Dear Jennifer: Opus Northwest LLC is forwarding this letter in response to your letter dated December 31, 1997 with regard to the comments from the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) meeting held on December 30, 1997. Confirmation that blasting will not be used has been requested by the ERC. Opus Northwest LLC is currently not planning on using blasting to perform earthwork operations on the lower site. We request that this application be processed assuming that conventional construction techniques will be used. In addition, Deep Dynamic Compaction (DDC) is a possibility only on the upper site due to the existing mine issue on that site. There will be no DDC on the lower site, and the ERC's comments with respect to DDC were addressed in a separate response, regarding the upper site, to the City of Renton dated January 8, 1998. There have been no changes to the grading plan on the lower site and therefore the earthwork calculations previously transmitted are current. Since both the Upper and Lower sites will both require a net export of material, there is no exchange of material planned between the two sites. Therefore, Opus Northwest LLC requests that this permit application be processed separately from the Upper Site, Application LUA-97- 163, in accordance with the intent of the original permit submittals. Please review these two permits independently of each other and address the issues of each separately. We trust that this information addresses the concerns raised during the ERC meeting and that the necessary reviews may continue without delay. Should you have any questions or require more information, please feel free to contact me at (425) 453-4100. Sincerely, Roge`r-Pecsok cc: Bart Brynestad, Opus Northwest LLC . Dave Kessler, Opus Northwest LLC - Harry DeMarre, Opus Northwest LLC Opus Northwest LLC is an affiliate of the Opus group of companies—Architects,Contractors,Developers Chicago,Columbus,Dallas,Denver,Ft.Lauderdale,Milwaukee,Minneapolis,Pensacola,Phoenix,Sacramento,San Francisco,Seattle,Tampa,Washington,D.C. I , yorthwest LLC ^ OPUS® .12th Avenue NE /1 Suite 205 Bellevue,Washington 98004 425-453-4100 Fax 425-453-1712 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Ci IY OF RENTON ,,AN 21 1998 January 14, 1998 RECEIVED Jennifer Toth Henning Senior Planner Development Services Municipal Bldg. 3rd Floor Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Permit Application LUA-97-163, SA-H, ECF North 405- Upper Site Base Plan &Alternate 1-Cascade Airgas Dear Jennifer: I am forwarding this letter in response to our conversation this afternoon regarding the Deep Dynamic Compaction (DDC) technique proposed for the North 405-Upper Site. As per our previous letter, the DDC technique is proposed in lieu of overexcavation. However, if the Environmental Review Committee will not allow DDC, then Opus will perform overexcavation in accordance with the previously transmitted information from our geotechnical engineer, Terra Associates. If overexcavation is required, slight adjustments in the grading will be made to keep the site balanced; creating no additional net export of material. Overexcavation will be required only in those areas where there has been mining activity, not throughout the entire building area. The area to be covered by either DDC or overexcavation is shown clearly on Figure 2 of the previously transmitted report by Terra Associates, dated 12/17/97. Should you have any questions or require more information, please contact me at (425) 453-4100. Sincerely, 44.1 Roger Pecsok Real Estate Representative cc: Bart Brynestad, Opus Northwest Dave Kessler, Opus Northwest Harry DeMarre, Opus Northwest Opus Nc1*l.1.ktsd&14 affiliate of the Opus group of companies—Architects,Contractors,Developers Chicago,Columbus,Dallas,Denver,Ft.Lauderdale,Milwaukee,Minneapolis,Pensacola,Phoenix,Sacramento,San Francisco,Seattle,Tampa,Washington,D.C. ~~ EXISTING BUILDING ED PARCEL Z7 APPROXIMATE SCALE 'ONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 feet --------------- oil \XX -\1"'WN TEST PITS BY TERRA ASSOCIATES (1/97) TEST RENCH BY COLDER ASSOCIATES (8/97) TEST BORINGS BY TERRA ASSOCIATES (12/97) V. CK SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY COLDER ASSOCIATES, JOB No. 9731212, PLATE 4, DATED 11/97. V METRO S. IN ~... � EXPLORATION klC4T|DN PLAN NORTH 4O� UPPER �N� k���� ������NTON ���A|N�TON .`�., . ~,' .. .~. ..,~. ~., �wo�eo�n�o| Consultants� PngDEC.No. Date DEC 1997 U Figure 2 - U U Northwest LLC , I 0PUS®1 quo- 05 Avenue NE Suite 205 Bellevue,Washington 98004 425-453-4100 Fax 425-453-1712 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Wd✓,"sr nr ri-r)Nl JAN 0 9 199 January 8, 1998 Jennifer Toth Henning riEcovE0 Senior Planner Development Services Municipal Bldg. 3rd Floor Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Permit Application LUA-97-163, SA-H, ECF North 405- Upper Site Base Plan & Alternate 1-Cascade Airgas Dear Jennifer: Opus Northwest LLC is forwarding this letter in response to your letter dated December 31, 1997 with regard to the comments from the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) meeting held on December 30, 1997. Additional earthwork information has been requested by the ERC. Revised grading plans by our Civil Engineer have been developed which allow for the site to be balanced except for approximately 5,000 c.y. of the topsoil layer which will be exported. This will be accomplished by raising the finish floor elevation to 76'. A total of approximately 59,000 c.y. of grade & fill operations will be performed. This general grading plan, seven (7) copies of which are attached, will be used for either the Base Plan or Alternate 1-Cascade Airgas. Please see the attached sheet for cut and fill calculations. Please note that the estimated stripping volume is just over 11,000 c.y. This material will be sifted and reused with approximately half of it exported. Also, the 5,500 c.y. of extra cut volumes will be used to fill space created by the use of Deep Dynamic Compaction, as described below and in the attached letter. As a result, a total of approximately 5,000 c.y. of export is estimated for this project. This material will be exported via West Valley Highway to a site located at Glacier and Cascade Streets in Tukwila, WA. Since only the export of topsoil will be required, there will be no earthwork exchanged between the upper and the lower site. Therefore, Opus Northwest LLC requests that this permit application be processed separately from the Lower Site, Application LUA-97-164, in accordance with the intent of the original permit submittals. Currently, the Upper Site is scheduled for a construction start of April, 1998. Please review these two permits independently of each other and address the issues of each separately. Opus Northwest LLC is an affiliate of the Opus group of companies—Architects,Contractors,Developers Chicago,Columbus,Dallas,Denver,Ft.Lauderdale,Milwaukee,Minneapolis,Pensacola,Phoenix,Sacramento,San Francisco,Seattle,Tampa,Washington,D.C. � a OPUS® The geotechnical report previously transmitted described the need to either perform Deep Dynamic Compaction (DDC) or overexcavation due to some of the mine issues. Opus Northwest LLC is planning on using the DDC technique as opposed to overexcavation. A report from our geotechnical Engineer is attached which addresses the issues raised by the ERC regarding this technique. We trust that this information addresses the concerns raised during the ERC meeting and that the necessary reviews may continue without delay. Should you have any questions or require more information, please feel free to contact me at (425) 453-4100. Sincerely, ' ue RogXcsok Real Estate Representative cc: Bart Brynestad, Opus.Northwest Dave Kessler, Opus Northwest Harry DeMarre, Opus Northwest TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc `.. " Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology • Environmental Earth Sciences January 7,.'1998 Project No. T=3453 Mr. Harry DeMarre Opus Northwest, LLC" 200— 112th Avenue NE, Suite 205 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Subject: City.of Renton Environmental Review Committee Comments I . North 405 Upper arid.-Lower Sites ', - Renton,,Washington Reference: - Geotechnical Engineering Study and Abandoned Mine Assessment,North 405 Upper and Lower Sites, prepared by Terra Associates, Inc.,Project No. T=3453;dated December 17, 1997 Dear Harry: The Environmental Review Committee;.(ERC) for the City of Renton has requested additional information related to construction techniques we discussed in the above referenced report.-This,request was outlined in a letter to.your office from the City of Renton dated December.31, 1997. Specifically, the ERC has requested additional information regarding the deep dynamic compaction(DDC)technique that we recommended asi an alternative, to consolidate or compact loose soils and collapse any` undocumented mine workings. _ The following discussion provides additional details regarding this procedure. ; As discussed in the referenced report, DDC consists of lifting a heavy weight,generally consisting of a concrete or steel block, with a large crane and then allowing it to fall freely back down to the ground • surface.. For this project, we would expect that the block used would have a weight on the order of ten • tons and would be dropped from a maximum height of about 50 feet. The weight is dropped in a grid pattern with center to center spacing between drop points of about ten feet. The weight is dropped at the same location approximately five to ten times: • ,The DDC process results in the development of large craters at the ground surface which will require filling and compaction using normal ,construction techniques. The impact of the weight will also generate ground vibrations and sound waves,,the level of which will be dependent upon the magnitude of the weight and:the height of the drop:, 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 • Phone (425) 821-7777 Mr.Harry DeMarre January;7,'-1998' . Terra Associates,Inc.has completed two:construction projects where the DDC procedure was used: On both of these-project, our monitoring included instrumentation to measure ground vibrations:and'sound decibel levels at various distances from the drop'points.- The weights used were'10 and 18-ton steel blocks which were dropped from heights of 50 to 80'feet. 'Instrumentation used to-monitor vibrations generated by the impacts on both projects recorded particle velocities ranging from 0.2 to0.4 inches per second at distances of 50 to 125 feet and:0:1 to 0:25 inches per second at-distances'of 200 to 300 feet. On:one project,'"which was completed in,a residential area, we also measured the sound decibel levels: ' At distances'Of 100 feet, decibel levels were recorded in:the range'of 120'to 140. . The Bureau of Mines-has'conducted extensiVe investigations' into the effect%.of ground vibrations on'; , structures. The',results..of their'.investigations found that ground,displacements or particle velocities ranging from '1.to 2.5 inches per second were usually required to crack or loosen plaster. 'As aresult of - ' their studies,a particle velocity,of one inch per second or'less was recommended,as•a'safe level'to avoid damage to existing adjacent structures. ' King County Metro. and the"City Of Renton have existing utilities."on or adjacent to the site.. .Metro'-s ' ; - Utilities consist of a 96-inch,diameter concrete cylinder pipe (CCP) used to transport effluent from the • treatment plant east of Monster Road,and two ductile iron force mains,':16 and inches in diameter.. .. These utilities are located along'the'western margin of the lower site(Parcel B);a.distance greater than' 450 feet"from:the area at,which the DDC'would be applied:,The DDC procedure would have'no effect onthese existing Metro utilitylines - - The.City of Renton,has,a 1.2-inch diameter water linelocated along-the northern margin of Parcel A: This line will'be within'10to 15 feet of the DDC area andcould;possibly be affected by ground motions generated by the DDC. To mitigate this potential, an isolation trench would be excavated between the ;. DDC area and the water line to prevent or'disrupt"ground wave propagation in this direction. •Based on our experience'with.DDC and published information with.mitigation as.discussed.above,, ground`-vibrations generated.by,the .DDC process, although perceptible, would"not be expected.to damage existing:utilities'or structures.. Similarly,the noise level'generated by the process would not"be any greater<.than that generated by conventional".-construction activity,,-such;'as pile driving or jack ' hammering:, We trust the information presented is sufficient-to meet your current needs. Should.you have any - questions or requite ad•; ` -atlease call. Sincerel ;ours eo ore J. Sch° K P •742 4' ' %Princi p al En"ine P . g .v"'�NAL �• TJS:dvp ICES .6/W q g , Project No.':T-345,3 ; Page No:2 • . CIT't OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 31, 1997 • Mr.Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest,LLC 200-112th Avenue NE, Suite 205 • Bellevue,WA 98004 • SUBJECT: UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE(FILE NO.LUA-97-163,SA-H, ECF),AND LOWER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE(FILE NO.LUA- 97-164,SA-A,ECF) Dear Mr. Pecsok: The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) met yesterday to discuss the Upper Monster Road Warehouse proposal. They reviewed the additional materials submitted (the geotechnical and coal mine study, and revised cut/fill calculations). While the geotechnical and coal mine studies answered many of the concerns of the ERC, several other issues related,to the environmental impacts of construction for both the Upper and Lower Monster Road sites Were raised. The ERC has requested additional information related to the construction techniques .discussed in the geotechnical report. Specific information requests are discussed below: • 1. The geotechnical report discusses two.;construction techniques to address mine features and undocumented mine workings on the Upper Monster Road site. Overexcavation to a • minimum depth of 20 feet below current site grade with grade then restored with suitably compacted structural fill, or alternatively, deep dynamic compaction to consolidate soils and compact undocumented mine workings are suggested. Both of these techniques would result in potential environmental concerns. If overexcavation is proposed,then the ERC is requesting earth calculations documenting the amount of additional material to be moved, exported and,imported. The amount of material to be overexcavated has a bearing on the number of additional truck hauling trips, impact on haul routes, dust generation, mud, and erosion/sedimentation control. If deep dynamic compaction (DDC) is proposed,then more detailed information is needed on this technique. King County/Metro has been in contact with the City and has concerns regarding the use of DDC since the Metro primary effluent transfer system line could be affected by ground vibration. Metro is currently reviewing the geotechnical report and plans to forward written comments to the City. • 2. The geotechnical report has indicated that two techniques may be utilized for the Lower Monster Road site, either excavation or blasting. In recent telephone conversations, you have indicated that blasting is not a construction method presently being considered by Opus. Blasting or excavation of 60 feet below existing grade would have environmental impacts. Again, the ERC is requesting information regarding the construction method to be used, and the amount of material to be moved, imported or exported. If blasting would not be used,the ERC has requested written verification from Opus. • • HADIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\PROJECTS\97-163.JH PKSKLTRDOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Page 2 December 31, 1997 3. The calculations for quantity of material to be cut and filled does not appear to include the additional material from overexcavation or deep excavation of either site. Please provide updated earthwork calculations with alternates for the various construction methods. The ERC has tabled the Upper and Lower Monster Road Warehouse sites until receipt of this additional information. According to information submitted with your project applications, it appears that both sites will be developed at the same time. The ERC will consider the sites together for the purposes of SEPA and in order to evaluate cumulative environmental impacts. The ERC has also indicated that they are considering sending the Lower Monster Road site to the Hearing Examiner for a public hearing. Since the discussion of both sites has been tabled,the public hearing will be delayed. The ERC is requiring that staff re-issue the notice of application with a full disclosure of the construction impacts, that is, the possibility of deep dynamic compaction, extensive grading and filling, possibility of blasting,the number of truck hauling trips, and haul routes. We will not be able to re-issue the Notice of Application until the additional requested information is received. I would be happy to meet with you to discuss the concerns of the ERC. Please feel free to contact me to discuss this letter or to schedule a meeting.. My direct telephone line is (425)277-6186. Sincerely, *fr(11-61/1/1/' • it 11) :fi°1°4\. enmfer Toth Henning Project Manager • • _ I Northwest LLC -112th Avenue NE 1 OPUS. Suite 205 Bellevue,Washington 98004 425-453-4100 Fax 425-453-1712 • December 22, 1997 VIA UPS OVERNIGHT • Jennifer Toth Henning Senior Planner Development Services 200 Mill Avenue South Municipal Bldg. 3rd Floor Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Permit Applications LUA-97-164, SA-H &LUA-097-163, SA-A, ECF North 405- Upper&Lower Sites Dear Jennifer: In response to your letter dated December 11, 1997 and our conversations regarding the issue of steep slopes on the subject sites, Opus Northwest LLC is forwarding the attached Justification for Variance Request narratives. Also attached is the required fee of $250 for each of the variance requests. Should you have any questions or require more information, please feel free to contact me at (425) 453-4100. Sincerely, pco� R r Pecsok Real Estate Representative Enclosure cc: Bart Brynestad, Opus Northwest LLC R rcorivoEN D DEC 2 41997 s:/redev/monsterroad/geolech 112_22.doc BUILDING DIVISION Opus Northwest LLC is an affiliate of the Opus group of companies-Architects,Contractors,Developers Chicago,Columbus,Dallas,Denver,Ft.Lauderdale,Milwaukee,Minneapolis,Pensacola,Phoenix,Sacramento,San Francisco,Seattle,Tampa,Washington,D.C. NORTH 405-UPPER SITE OPUS NORTHWEST LLC Subject: Justification for Variance Request Permit: LUA-97-164, SA-H, ECF, V-1-1 NORTH 405 -UPPER SITE Opus Northwest LLC requests a variance for the North 405 -Upper Site project, from the requirements that slopes over 40% can not be cleared. This variance request meets all the justification requirements as set forth by the City of Renton. These justifications are listed below: a) Large warehouse projects, such as the one proposed, require a relatively flat site. Large buildings and truck maneuvering areas require that only very minor grades are present. The topography of the site includes a hillside on the West side of the property which acts as a barrier between the proposed development and the existing regional storm detention facility to the West. This area represents a very small portion of the site, and is where slopes in excess of 40% are present. This area will need to be cleared so that grading may take place. Grading is planned for the construction of the parking areas and of a biofiltration swale for runoff from the site's parking area which will then be conveyed to the West.. The location and shape of the steep slopes would provide an irregular grading area which would make a very large portion of the site unusable, and therefore the project much less practical, if it is not graded and left as is. b) A variance will not be detrimental to the subject property or the adjacent property to the West since the clearing will be immediately followed by grading to stabilize the area. During the grading portion of the work, an engineered and approved temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be in effect. A geotechnical report has been prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer for this project. c) The approval of a variance for the North 405 - Upper Site will not constitute a grant of special privilege in that the grading of this area is necessary for the development of the site. The type of project proposed, which is consistent with the existing zoning, typically needs a very large area of flat and level land due to the building sizes and required truck maneuvering area. It is very difficult to find a parcel of land this size that does not have at least a small section, such as this site, that does not have some minor slopes on it. d) The variance requested is a minimum variance in that the location of the steep slopes is at the edge of the proposed grading area. Some slopes resulting from the proposed work will still be in excess of 40%, but will be part of the engineered site plan. The slopes further to the West, on the lower site, will not be effected. CITY OF RECEIVE R DEC241997 S 1 BUILDING DIVISION ***I************************************************************* City of Renton WA Reprinted: 12/29/97 10 : 12 Receipt **************************************************************** Relceipt Number: R9708150 Amount : 250 . 00 12/29/97 10 : 12 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #1434 OPUS NW Init : LMN Project #: LUA97-164 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 242304-9121 Location: 12XX BLOCK OF MONSTER RD SW Total Fees : 2, 758 .32 This Payment 250 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 2 , 758 . 32 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 0100 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0019 Variance Fees 250 . 00 I . nn.'c Northwest LLC OPUS® 112th Avenue NE 1 Suite 205 Bellevue,Washington 98004 425-453-4100 Fax 425-453-1712 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING December 18, 1997 DEC i 11997 Jennifer Toth Henning ECHVED Senior Planner City of Renton, Development Services Municipal Bldg. 3rd Floor Renton, Washington 98055 Subject: Permit Applications LUA-97-164, SA-H & LUA-097-163, SA-A, ECF North 405- Upper& Lower Sites Dear Jennifer: In response to your letter dated December 11, 1997 Opus Northwest LLC is forwarding one (1) original and four (4) copies of the attached Final Geotechnical Engineering Study and Abandoned Mine Assessment by Terra Associates, Inc. dated December 17, 1997. In addition, it is approximated that the Lower Site will have 31,950 cubic yards of export material and that the Upper Site will have 38,200 cubic yards of export material. Please see the attached calculations for more detail. Should you have any questions or require more information, please feel free to contact me at (425) 453-4100. Sincerely, Bart Brynestad Director- Real Estate Representative cc: Roger Pecsok, Opus Northwest Opus Northwest LLC is an affiliate of the Opus group of companies-Architects,Contractors,Developers Chicago,Columbus,Dallas,Denver,Ft.Lauderdale,Milwaukee,Minneapolis,Pensacola,Phoenix,Sacramento,San Francisco,Seattle,Tampa,Washington,D.C. • r . ♦ ♦ ' NOTICE OF APPLICATION*REVISION* . a PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: DECEMBER 16,1997 A Master Application has been Bled and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton.The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF,V/UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE • DESCRIPTION: The applicant,Roger Pecsok of Opus Northwest,proposes 10 develop a 111,000 . square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parting for.87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock- high truck doors and four(4)on-grade truck doors.An alternate Is also being proposed.The alternate would feature a 101,088 s.f.building and parking for 108 vehicles.The project would include seventeen(17)dock-high doom and one(1) grade-level doer. The proposed project and alternate require environmental review,site plan approval(Hearing Examiner)and a cadence from the Land Clearing and Tree Culling Ordinance(Code Section 4-9)to clear areas where the slope is In excess of 40%. GENERAL LOCATION: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: Geelechnical Report—Including coal mine hazard Intonation Welland Report Preliminary Technical Report—Stormwater • PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review • I Site Plan Approval Variance Approval Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager, 1 , Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM en January 16,1998.This • matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on January 20.1998,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave.South.If you are interested In attending the heedng,please contact the Development Services Division,277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled.If comments cannot be submitted In writing by the date Indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner.If you have questions about this proposal,or wish lobe made a party of record and receive additional Information by mail,contact Ms.Henning of 277-8188.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record end will be notified of any decision on this project. IPLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION a DATE OF APPLICATION: OCTOBER 31,1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: NOVEMBER 06,1997 DATE OF REVISED NOTICE OF\APPLICATION: DECEMBER 18,1997 ; • c...n,:'.�\\`. ., ,.' ._`A�.L . _.� • 4:•4,.f,.., .'').. --xcln G0 "`-- ,l • • itiesil GENMALOT.DOC ;�':_ , 4:.,-�`f y; �..1 , • CERTiFICATION tr ,!gyp-roblivkfr!/ , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on ' pF(,I4(cH).--, /7,i7P7 • • Signed: :� 'STATE/ TATE/OF-•, ASHINGTON ) • • .) SS COUNTY-OF KING ) • • I 'ceriiify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that r,4y-'� • /),r/J/�!•(/ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses sand purposes mentioned in the instrument. , . 1 Dated: Co_o, • )cl , ) 9/ q7 - ) • Notary Publi in and for the Stale ashinglon Notary (Print)MARILYN KAMCHEFE- My appointmeeldmai ' 9 TY INRA NOTICE OF APPLICATION*REVISION* PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: DECEMBER 16, 1997 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The foll wing briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. • PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF,V/UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE DESCRIPTION: The applicant,Roger Pecsok of Opus Northwest,proposes to develop a 111,000 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public • hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock- high truck doors and four(4)on-grade truck doors. An alternate is also being proposed. The alternate would feature a 101,068 s.f.building and parking for 108 vehicles. The project would Include seventeen(17)dock-high doors and one(1) grade-level door. The proposed project and alternate require environmental review, site plan approval (Hearing Examiner)and a variance from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance (Code Section 4-9)to clear areas where the slope is in excess of 40%. i GENERAL LOCATION: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: Geotechnical Report—including coal mine hazard information Wetland Report Preliminary Technical Report—Stormwater PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review • Site Plan Approval Variance Approval Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager, Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on January 16,1998. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on January 20 1998,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave.South. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development . Services Division,277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in • writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Ms.Henning at 277-6186. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: OCTOBER 31,1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: NOVEMBER 06,1997 DATE OF REVISED NOTICE OF APPLICATION: DECEMBER 16,1997 �1`' .CO_ 121 t-t I`l1 Nti • , tout) •r-1 GENMALOT.DOC = i r ,\''`,y r;•' ! ;fir"� _ 'La Municipallity of Metropolitan Jefferson Smurfit Corporation _ Raymond Nielson 821 2nd Avenue PO Box 479 7000 SW Grady Way Seattle,WA 98104 Renton,WA 98057 - i Renton,WA 98055 I. King County Metro Municipality of Metro Seattle 500 K C Admin Bldg 821 2nd Ave#M 122 1100 Monster Road SW Seattle,WA 98104 Seattle,WA 98104 Renton,WA 98055 Eland Bldg Ltd Partnership B&G Renton Partnership Renton Fish and Game Club Inc. PO Box 80187 146 N Canal St#310 1700 SE 144th Street Seattle,WA 98108 Seattle,WA 98103 Renton,WA 98059 Fly Away Inc Blume Garrison Partnership. B&G Renton Asssociates 7421 South 180th St 2825 E Lake Ave E#310 2825 Eastlake Avenue East, Ste 115 �,WAS Seattle,WA 98102 Seattle,WA 98102 Kek,i-, a,o32. Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest LLC 200-112th Avenue NE,Ste 205 Bellevue,WA 98004 1 t,._. , � CIT! ` OF.RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 11, 1997 Mr.Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest LLC 200 112th Avenue NE, Suite 205 Bellevue,WA 98004 SUBJECT: UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE(FILE NO.LUA-097-164,SA- H)AND LOWER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE(FILE NO.LUA-097- 163,SA-A,ECF) Dear Mr.Pecsok: We are.unable to continue processing your application until additional information is provided. Both projects were considered by the City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on December.9, 1997. The ERC tabled their discussion'pending the receipt of additional clearing, grading, stormwater, and geotechnical information. Specifically,the ERC has concerns regarding the presence of mines or mining features on and/or under the site. Terra Associates geotechnical report is considered to be preliminary and should be revised to consider the specific development concepts(including building footprints). The geotechnical report recommended further studies,and the ERC have requested the status,findings and conclusions of those studies. The quantity of material to be moved on site'should be discussed in more_specific terms. Presently, we have preliminary estimates of 12,000 cubic yards to be moved on the Lower site, and 25,000 cubic yards for the upper site. Estimates should be provided for both'alternative designs on the Upper site. Also a discussion should be provided regarding site slopes. The City's Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance(Section 4-9)prohibits tree cutting or land clearing where the predominant slope or individual slope is in excess of 40% (except enhancement activities). If the steep slope areas being cleared exceed 40% slope,then�a variance would need to be applied for. Staff will discuss this with you further. The stormwater concerns discussed at ERC are being addressed by staff; and appear to'be resolved. In order to place both projects back on the ERC agenda for December 23, 1997, I would need the additional materials by the close of business on Wednesday, December 17. Please feel free to contact me at(425)277-6186 to discuss this. Alternatively, I would be happy to meet with you to discuss your projects. Sincerely, • fjukt:5 01:::k ennifer enning Project Manager H:IDIVISION.SIDEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\PROJECTS197-163.JH\RPKSKLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 . ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON Community Services Department &4�of'dlr.? il 1 i1/44›, o Committed to Enriching Lives o MEMORANDUM Date: December 5, 1997 To: Jennifer Toth Henning 1 From: Leslie Betlach, Parks Directy Re: Upper Monster Road Warehouse LUA-97-164, SA-H, ECF I am in receipt of your November 25, 1997 memorandum regarding submittal of new drawings by the applicant that amend their application to add an alternate. My comments (as noted on the November 20, 1997 Environmental 86 Development Application Review Sheet) still apply. For the record, they are again noted below: A. Environmental Impact(e.g. Non-Code) Comments: There are no impacts to Parks. B. Policy-Related Comments Street trees, landscaping and irrigation located outside the property boundary along Monster Road is the responsibility of the property owner to maintain. Recommend a 5' at grade bike lane along Monster Road as identified in the Comprehensive Trails Plan. C. Code-Related Comments: There are not impacts to Parks. LAB/dlf cc Sam Chastain, Community Services Administrator 1 97-590DF.DOC PaAct CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: November 25, 1997 TO: Green Folder Reviewers FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning(X6186) SUBJECT: Upper Monster Road Warehouse(LUA-97-164, SA-H, ECF) The applicant has submitted new drawings which amend their application to add an alternate. A potential tenant has been found for the project, and their space requirements are less than indicated under the original project description. The alternate would feature a 101,068 square foot structure. Of this 29,965 square feet would be used for production, 66,103 square feet would be used as warehouse, and 5,000 square feet would be used for office. A total of 108 parking spaces would be provided. Landscaped areas would total 3,900 square feet. The drawings for the alternate are attached. Please revise your comments as necessary. _ Comments due: December 8, 1997. Thank you. cc: H:\W W 60DO1IMEMO.DO11bh • „ ,-P.!:2541"Rieuosok4aipr CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON DEC 0 2 1997 PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS uiwirsm DiviStlON MEMORANDUM DATE: November 25, 1997 TO: Green Folder Reviewers FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning(X6186) SUBJECT: Upper Monster Road Warehouse'(LUA-97-164, SA-H,ECF) The applicant has submitted new drawings which amend their,application to add an alternate. A potential tenant has been found for the project, and their space requirements are less than indicated under the original project description. The alternate would feature a 101,068 square foot structure. Of this 29,965 square feet would be used for production, 66,103 square feet would be used as warehouse, and 5,000 square feet would be.used for office. A total of 108 parking spaces would be provided. Landscaped areas would total 3,900 square feet. The drawings for the alternate are attached. Please revise your comments as necessary. Comments due: December 8, 1997. Thank you. cc: CCU'yPi al Cawi iekA 511I/ va/,d- H:\W W60DOT�MEMO.DO'I1bh l l K0 reVIS1011 Ogiii Ye/4TiUG to Z' W1o061, C. f ;Ot1 , . '14) /4/7 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Water Comments Due: NOVEMBER 20, 1997 Application No.: LUA-97-164, SA-H-ECF Date Circulated:November 6, 1997. Applicant:Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest. Project Manager: Jennifer Toth Henning Project Title:Upper Monster Road Warehouse Work Order No: 78303 Location: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW Site Area: 7.11 Acres Building Area(gross): 111,000 sq. ft. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments NO COMMENT. B. Policy-Related Comments NO COMMENT. C. Code-Related Comments New water main, additional fire hydrants and DDCV Assembly (building fire control system) will be required and must meet current Fire Codes) regulations for fire protection of all buildings proposed on the site. Any new water mains, fire hydrants, DDCV Vaults, water meters located on private property will be require to be in easements that will be held by the City of Renton. New water meters for domestic and irrigation system will be required sized to meet UPC regulations/requirements. Water (SDC)fees of$0.113/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. �- 77. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date H:pesok4 W lAt V uoacv, `ION,tce4 crrY®F RENTON CITY OF RENTON DEC 02 iv PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC VaRKS MEMORANDUM utim(2 LAWPSBON DATE: November 25, 1997 TO: Green Folder Reviewers FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning(X6186) SUBJECT: Upper Monster Road Warehouse(LUA-97-164, SA-H, ECF) The applicant has submitted new drawings which amend their application to add an alternate. A potential tenant has been found for the project, and their space requirements are less than indicated under the original project description. The alternate would feature a 101,068 square foot structure. Of this 29,965 square feet would be used for production, 66,103 square feet would be used as warehouse, and 5,000 square feet would be used for office. A total of 108 parking spaces would be provided. Landscaped areas would total 3,900 square feet. The drawings for the alternate are attached. Please revise your comments as necessary. Comments due: December 8, 1997. Thank you. cc: H:\W W6ODOT\MEMO.DOT\bh 7,2/4/ 7 I - F�ire.. IPireuev-ha,:N pi- FIRE r.E. ,.' HUREAU DEC 0 2 1997 CITY OF RENTON L;E I VED PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: November 25, 1997 TO: Green Folder Reviewers FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning(X6186) SUBJECT: Upper Monster Road Warehouse (LUA-97-164, SA-H, ECF) The applicant has submitted new drawings which amend their application to add an alternate. A potential tenant has been found for the project, and their space requirements are less than indicated under the original project description. The alternate would feature a 101,068 square foot structure. Of this 29,965 square feet would be used for production, 66,103 square feet would be used as warehouse, and 5,000 square feet would be used for office. A total of 108 parking spaces would be provided. Landscaped areas would total 3,900 square feet. The drawings for the alternate are attached. Please revise your comments as necessary. Comments due: December 8, 1997. Thank you. lam' A2-7/fr cc: H:\W W6ODOT\MEMO.DOT\bh (SY 1. O et CITY OF RENTON �, N2o� FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: December 4, 1997 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal L . SUBJECT: Opus Office/Warehouse, Upper Monster Rd. Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary required fire flow is 5250 GPM. This requires a fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and five additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. A looped fire main is required by City ordinance. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the sprinkler and fire alarm systems. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals to be used or stored in the building. 4. A fire mitigation fee of$52,555.36 is required based on $.52 a square foot. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Transportation Comments Due: NOVEMBER 20, 1997 Application No.: LUA-97-164, SA-H-ECF Date Circulated:November 6, 1997 Applicant: Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest Project Manager: Jennifer Toth Henning Project Title: Upper Monster Road Warehouse Work Order No: 78303 Location: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW Site Area: 7.11 Acres Building Area(gross): 111 000(gT ) sq. ft. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments NO COMMENT. B. Policy-Related Comments NO COMMENT. C. Code-Related Comments The street frontage(Monster Road SW)will require curb,gutter, sidewalk driveways, street pavingand � q Y , street lights installed per current City of Renton Codes/Standards. A traffic mitigation fee of$75/trip in/out of the site (daily) will be required. The calculated amount per the ITE Trip generation Manual will be$40,260. (See attached data sheet). / • � ��`' //-0-77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date H:pesok3 • .SeVY 0 0 •fr,, su . • • JP .14317 yy ... ..•..:. >w7u: r172?l"?lZInJ%eN.YekfO»'» •. . .. TAT .01\up ^r5.7• '<�ct47(>: H .. 'Y•VN�'M)iX'�hR awOFivANNTMtyMw'F?%9•w�!V :HF�Ii 'o.A'ICN�K V Tryq •j( �`wK�Y1fA wO< .' �' .M ^YN`'L• T^ Project Name ✓fee✓ ov95t v leoad WeeveGu t( f Project Address 1200 Moti5tfV (a 5 tA) Contact Person Address Phone Number • Permit Number 1-UA — R7- Project Description 1 l l 1000 s .ff uta✓e I4oc uYl k -o-7 27 ✓e Nicie5 ii/t4.6( 52 lock �1Ir(li ho✓S Lt oyt- crva&(e -tvuok boovs . I � Land Use Type: MethoddoCalculation: ;,vuie ho"(s" 0150) ❑ Residential L7" ITE Trip Generation Manual par I' 3 / 0/Retail 0 Traffic Study o a Non-retail 0 Other Calculation: e G{u ,o4 : 7 = 3.6 gD(k) -t 3'42,65 0 1= "74-2,115 tops ose }�devuc}e R Li, V6 psi (0004 1I0) (4./1) = 536.gwil zv, Use iesse"i liec/ue , eat S-75 "te y • • (53%.g)(75) /40 ) 260. ov _ . Transportation Mitigation Fee: t 0 2 0 0 0 Calculated by: /v�f Ul/ Date: // 5 q Account Number: 105. 5RR, 3)80, 70. 00. Date of Payment NENTON FIRE DEPT -. FIRE PRFIFNTInN BUREAU City or Kenton Department of Planning/Building/Amin- Works NOIL ,ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW7S eET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 6 re pveva rni COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER o, triAr I VE APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 06, 1997 APPLICANT: Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: Upper Monster Road Warehouse WORK ORDER NO: 78303 LOCATION: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW SITE AREA: 7.11 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A ( BUILDING AREA(new): 111,000 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Roger Pecsok of Opus Northwest, proposes to develop a 111,000 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four(4) on-grade truck doors. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services ' Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet i1/2-Are B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS /v d-✓vim C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Se GkacS �� c�4,�� �/ 7/9'7 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly asse this proposal. elA/17(( 7 97 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 r • ��Y CITY OF RENTON ;,� FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU + IR MEMORANDUM ��'NTs DATE: November 7, 1997 TO: Jennifer Toth Hennig, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Code-Related Comments for Upper Monster Road Warehouse 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,250 gpm. Six fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and five fire hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of building: 120,510 square feet x $0.52 = $62,665.20 This fee is payable at the time of building permit issuance. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 4. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout the structure. CT:ct opusupr City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Water Comments Due: NOVEMBER 20, 1997 Application No.:LUA-97-164, SA-H-ECF Date Circulated:November 6, 1997 Applicant: Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest Project Manager: Jennifer Toth Henning Project Title:Upper Monster Road Warehouse Work Order No: 78303 Location: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW Site Area: 7.11 Acres Building Area(gross): 111,000 sq. ft. A.Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments NO COMMENT. B. Policy-Related Comments NO COMMENT. C. Code-Related Comments New water main, additional fire hydrants and DDCV Assembly (building fire control system) will be required and must meet current Fire Codes) regulations for fire protection of all buildings proposed on the site. Any new water mains, fire hydrants, DDCV Vaults, water meters located on private property will be require to be in easements that will be held by the City of Renton. New water meters for domestic and irrigation system will be required sized to meet UPC regulations/requirements. Water (SDC)fees of$0.113/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. • --� �- 77 Signature of Director o Authorized Representative Date H:pesok4 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Wastewater/Surface Water Comments Due: NOVEMBER 20, 1997 Application No.: LUA-97-164, SA-H-ECF Date Circulated:November 6, 1997 Applicant: Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest Project Manager: Jennifer Toth Henning Project Title: Upper Monster Road Warehouse Work Order No: 78303 Location: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW Site Area: 7.11 Acres Building Area(gross): 111,000 sq. ft. ,II A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code)Comments NO COMMENT. B. Policy-Related Comments NO COMMENT. C. Code-Related Comments - I Wastewater: The site will require extension of the sanitary sewer main in Monster Road at Oakesdale Ave. SW with manholes to serve the site. Side sewer connection to the proposed building is required with the permit cost at$100/connection. Sanitary sewer (SDC) fees of$0.078/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. Surface Water: The drainage system and temporary erosion control for the site shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. Biofiltration will be required (more than 5,000 sq. ft) of new impervious surface subject to vehicular use is proposed to be constructed on site. The project will require storm drainage (SDC) fees of $0.129/sq. ft. of new impervious surface installed on the site. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date H:pesok5 City Ur Renton Department of Planning/Building/1-uuna Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: '?1L S COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 20, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 06, 1997 APPLICANT: Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: Upper Monster Road Warehouse WORK ORDER NO: 78303 LOCATION: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW SITE AREA: 7.11 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A BUILDING AREA(new): 111,000 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Roger Pecsok of Opus Northwest, proposes to develop a 111,000 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four(4) on-grade truck doors. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the . Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services 'Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 0-e/1/7U/d4.22( c--X-7a A___ ,4. 1.,(3-7/Z-e &rie<72 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ffle-o4--y„ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas quire itional information is a ded to properly assess this proposal. ( 9/1 /e/V Signature of Director or Autiorized Representative Dat DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City _ Benton Department of Planning/Building/F Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: CifyISM C41OV' COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 20, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 06, 1997 APPLICANT: Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: Upper Monster Road Warehouse WORK ORDER NO: 78303 CM'Or LOCATION: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW VJV' r,.. 1997 SITE AREA: 7.11 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A BUILDING AREA(new): 111,006100. 1+.y4 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Roger Pecsok of Opus Northwest, proposes to develop a 111,ObO`s'gUSK"foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four(4) on-grade truck doors. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Wafer Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoroline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Histortc/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Alrport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS //OAf C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS /(1i)Afc- We have re i wed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad ' nal information is needed to property assess this proposal. /i77 ature of Directo r Authorized Represent Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 City_. ..anton Department of Planning/Building/PI_-.___ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: A y-r)vrt- COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 20, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 06, 1997 APPLICANT: Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: Upper Monster Road Warehouse WORK ORDER NO: 78303 LOCATION: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW SITE AREA: 7.11 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A BUILDING AREA(new): 111,000 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Roger Pecsok of Opus Northwest, proposes to.develop a 111,000 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four(4) on-grade truck doors. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HIstorldCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 16.5 14,000 Feet Np B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS The proposed project does not appear to pose any impact upon the Renton Municipal Airport. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS The proposed project does not appear to pose any impact upon the Renton Municipal Airport. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad " nal inform•< is needed to properly assess this proposal. o IT 1151 Signature erector or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DO Rev.10/93 wa 1 • a { Mal117611 1 9 Z p- --- / ] JL . 1rIPd,1 Viv lki I. '1& II \A ia.i,..l !;'..# I Y r lam• N 1 _ ! A - . to212;/".,/-m--I--.---!iii M.'. IASI' ' f rif firfor WA.1- 1•01Ziffir.,:alialr- 11..... 1 I • as w N:cre: .Ltt .---ilif L� •\\\ •lI A i �,y t 0] n J \.\ * ' Te41. ..---41i ,,.....a_____} . • i . .,,,r AN4 -s4 f, „. 0. , - ,A ....,, II.. lit ._„,,w-:,,AL,.. :. L 1._____L _ ". ... . ..,_, ,,\ vik.,-,,„ Ltip. .,, ,,4 ,- --. ,-,,,, F s . ,..frago:::(17 wig . ii riptidop,wiefr.„ (- ,® .. l pmpm{{77D % /:Sal 411PV NI e ' 5- •-• . i -...-..a03E-Elti— p_ ..jtifilei :1' w A....:4.42 II' 7; tjr7:11ffiliro:441. ' • 4:.-....... 41"1"" ---....m.r.t!:. , . ._.jet . w pre.v,4w li19)/ , / cr 14 Air : • i� iq illfire el LIAR/ES Lisii±k1 Mt ''6, L-c--7' ,10.41k: ,N4 _. + , -ljn:i I .. _ - liami - tIOCZ) 'r-; , i ii,, 4 a k #., Jp . ‘ OITZ: i " VW ritun'N-TLI:: Or] . _ - - 0: o w. . 1ERMBEIEEmZM(30it..l. Alibi.:. - '' Brat . k* wIlM.47.: -' I glii]tiVell.11111211.•• gin kiAlli ' -,---Hlitt--4, R -I .•"4".tkLrg IV 4;1 ,.• _____ )(h=1:3ff , e._.‘. ..,, — e .. 04 . _ \__ , , ..,..____,....__._ ___ 21,_„.1.6=2. ('rrll p ______:_:_:_:_:_:, ___: , ' -0* Do r /,_, - i - --_-::::::::-:Ki:::::---_:-:-:-_--;_:_:-E_,--_::-.=:_:-:-:::_:-::::__--:::::::::::_ e\v-AIRAAT At, --r\SJ r"IlE ' 11';1 1 i al il'Al \\ -- --------------7H-:-:-:-.7-:-.-.-=-H-_-_-_-_-_-_ -_-_-_-_-_:._ •.. [Sj it ! . iii, ' ,_ __::::::_::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::_:_:_:_:_:_x_:_:._ __:_::::_:_:_:_s_ .„(4 imiza_. 9 IV . -'.ll. N s:::::::::::33:3:33:::_-."-::::::_:::::-:::::;E:E:;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::3;-::::EE:=E::::::.*:::"E:_`_:::,%. ....,., ?: TOOLlij . j1 o im • . i 1 a -:EEEEREEEEEEE ":::::_::Kg:::::::72:7.:Ea:EatE.:Eir..E.V.:::_:.]:=&___ "I pLtAk , diuuFiF71 ji .1-\(\ '7-- E -----11, ).\1_ •, ••,-) , 1 - e-:::::E.:EEEEE:: ..:E:E:"--_.:K=E:KIK:::-:::::::::::::-::::.:::::::::::::.-.:-:::„. :-.::::_::::::::---_::::::::::.__ ..."E=141 qr\ju i ? \II •I_-. -. ii ,,,, . ._ E=IL ,..,iv, ..`. Ill _� ;\Vil.-I - 7 ''' : itiellt -:::::----":::I::::::::::::::: _ -4.mtEM-:-E:::::-_----th---..:-.--.5.1-E:E=E:K:::::::::::-::::::::::::::::;:--:::__\\/v; wi N fir,, jsEgg�:�z::,. ==== _=-== =-====================___===_====`========- qo -— I` I ",••� ______________ 4 ___ __________ _ __ ___ ___- 00� City_ ,_snton Department of Planning/Building/Puw, Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: W.ICZ, COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 20, 1997. APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 06, 1997 APPLICANT: Roger Pecsok/Opus Northwest PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: Upper Monster Road Warehouse WORK ORDER NO: 78303 LOCATION: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW SITE AREA: 7.11 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A BUILDING AREA(new): 111,000 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Roger Pecsok of Opus Northwest, proposes to develop a 111,000 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock-high truck doors and four(4) on-grade truck doors. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Ught/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services - Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet a f f 1;di Antal/) --t Gin c� ponce) 0/6e4) i7-e-e�/ fv . UL"--/-J detcuied Zk%�C /LQ- Ln In cL'Qh p/LD U L co a CCLXAfl L L'/YL 2G7 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this apprcation with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas where dditional information Is needed to properly ess this proposal. i fl cam �_ � I/- /'9-77 SignatWe of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 onus Northwest LLC .12th Avenue NE % OPUS® Suite 205 Bellevue,Washington 98004 425-453-4100 Fax 425-453-1712 November 20, 1997 Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning Senior Planner Development Services Municipal Bldg. 3`d Floor Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Permit Application LUA-97-164 North 405- Upper Site Alternate 1 - Cascade Airgas Dear Jennifer: As per our conversation last week, Opus Northwest LLC is submitting the attached plans as an addendum to the original submittal. These are possible plans with Cascade Airgas as a tenant, for which the project would be built on a build-to-suit basis. Please accept these plans as Alternate 1 - Cascade Airgas, in addition to the original site plan application materials. Twelve (12) full size prints and one (1) PMT reduction of the Site Plan, Elevations and Floor Plan are included for this alternate. Should you have any questions or require more information, please feel free to contact me at (425) 453-4100. Very truly yours, gUA e "\ Roger`Pecsok Real Estate Representative Enclosure cc: Bart Brynestad, Opus Northwest LLC s:/redev/monsterroad/cascadel l 19.doc Opus Northwest LLC is an affiliate of the Opus group of companies-Architects,Contractors,Developers Chicago,Columbus,Dallas,Denver,Ft.Lauderdale,Milwaukee,Minneapolis,Pensacola,Phoenix,Sacramento,San Francisco,Seattle,Tampa,Washington,D.C. NOV-26.-97 WED 07:05 OPUS NORTHWEST LLC FAX NO. 12064531712 P, 02/02 . •� f • ALTERNATE 1 - CASCADE AIRGAS . NORTH 405 - UPPER SITE Project Narrative: The North 405 - Upper Site (Alternate I Cascade Airgas) project is a likely alternate to the baseline Site Plan Application for the approximately seven (7) acre parcel of land on tax lot #242304 9121. This project represents approximately a.9%o deviation in occupied space from the baseline application. Most other aspects of the project are very similar. The proposed alternate project is an industrial/warehouse facility of approximately 101,084 square feet, as opposed to the baseline application project which is 111,000 square feet. The building will have concrete tilt-up walls with approximately a twenty eight foot (28') high exterior_ There will be approximately seventeen (17) dock high doors, one (1) on grade door and 100 parking spaces as opposed to fifty two (52) dock high doors, four(4) on grade doors and eighty seven(87)parking spaces as in the baseline application. The site will have two access points to Monster Road, one to the North and one to the South. Landscaping and property buffers will be installed in compliance with all City standards. The grading plan, utilities and storm water system will be approximately the same as with the baseline submittal. • • • oT e li \ \?.........--'\,;74" COU 3. 3, 35 ,,tJ war---+ j -+,/ = )/ to C • Q, vLHT • 'eI Ij i oT°i/ _ .N./ i 1 T / � +. Wa I` 1 ` I, tr: ��( 1µe \ ''N # I . • ,ls • .._.4„• le' i N I!li[Ma GRAPHIC SCALE - 1 41f. -I-- - �'I ` r O . / AM..6. ,,,--"- '''._, ''''--- ... c ,,,,.-›- -'. \ k„,.. . ,...„,„ . i ..„ im.........., . N Y •� q ji; I V j - `,._ • _ / � O • W'S.N'I x 6 i 0 N T[Cg • w+ J-l I,. • •5{{} I , .a.N, ...� a :ac ' -: I. N ��2` -� .��';dill'4`s.-.., e=• *.. . ' I T % 4 ., 'f�* l 'i '•4-.���' ..vy 1 A S H I N-•G T y0{i 1 1 T E C H � E/�. .1 i ..• � , •�•r {.1• \ CENTEN I,_,`(I ll LI3R sr.,� j n rye l \ ., n \.)� r. ..,...„ !..„0:: •ii < , W.71N2. '• r _ -. I1.70 Acre �� ' - _ ,_...._.a.,...._.... _ .._ EAE ENrE II V rrr • , '—' �� II vYn Y o Nii°Fril . rill �PC it l RIO. , %Rot. 1 / •--4::',...-• i '. ."Pa r- TM 12 v / • .V0`- � --. -_ l.N.*.. u. tl' bee: WAS I N G' \ � G It , GerN•. .N T I ' , r • Tu. �!4«•(r.'' d151O.. , F O:R T ! - _Y* � T T E C NN �rg' , ; • .._ J ' 3 S , LD /PRo a _. l sw+llrs ■: ff 11.• 6suns, O R T 1 I ` .-• >" :•� D E KIT.. - 0 . c �. � I I i. • � A � , -, Nn. gok - = --—�^ ` s. r z - 4 I: %.,:n '-% \. DE ( T ` • , G J��.0 OW> .... . -\ , -,- S. ISIST ST• �,\ �\ f9 -;r Ir - .. O F 5gE Fbi c� Rio ��' .V .� f E�7' O�z 111 \:: ' LDR '1-, ` .- 744�'A' tv• _.. I�Ea r�R� Y _ Ø '. — ct%• n 4 9G tw� k ' ' If `P e; � IN EFSTI sL$7 '-�': 4..._.... � t't fir',)I»a. C/L( k,A _�,;, Y'"-'o,'O H. '®, :rY®LC� �_3 ix L____ .'`n2,,. laoo Aaes .wI I A,i'� CSh,':�. .k.. / ii \ 0 I • Tukwila Park •.,. \.` 4oiE. !, ./{ �� may► ` Boh.WB ' »�,r4.„, ,p4: - ' + / 1 } G Y W. 9 3B.60Aoes CO ....��z»u .;, * I I. : • 1;1 IV, - 'AV. ii ,....; . , .(,, , , 1-4 . ,::: -..,...,-, ,�^C L E. a © CITY OF RENTON A,h, mil Planning/Building/Public Works i t A r< <.. 'a ,Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Q �, _ �` ` 0)tta N NOV 4797 1 � � .295 . , '~ a i rs .z Cf5T!, . `` A' Vi1 B&G Rent 1 Prtnrshp t/1 r✓°VIA 9,1A-14/4 146NCa 1St #310 Seattle, A 98103 VI Of- G S A A ,d re-CC 2 2304 9121 06 • HI 0 *t,31 i 03 f ] s jj jj jj }7 i `` jj j iiiLl{itli19lifiLii_ iilidt4i11 0•S(VY0 AR V't 4:1WA rr�. NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 1997 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF/UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE DESCRIPTION: The applicant,Roger Pecsok of Opus Northwest,proposes to develop a 111,000 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock- high truck doors and four(4)on-grade truck doors. GENERAL LOCATION: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: N/A PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted in wilting to Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager, Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on December 22,1997. This • matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on January 06,1998,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave.South. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Ms.Henning at 277-6186. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: OCTOBER 31,1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: NOVEMBER 06,1997 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: NOVEMBER 06,1997 • ••••.,,\,. • , •',,,•- ."....•••:-''': •.e..-.-.,... W ..:, ------"N\ . „ . ,;:T` - ,' i V CO -',N GENMALOT. a 41) CITY OF RENTON — - ;"..'.474.70001161"'".12trrarillAIMMV................4 eel/ Planning/Building/Public Works . 4 A .1.1 V, 0)21; • Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ,..... 4 CC -4 Ile Is 4;41141 0 0 110V 0 T'S I pe.i.ocit,,W z 0 2 9 5 : Q) . -taiga •• , , . • I ii 64 U.S. POSTAGE i CI - cr' Raymond Nielson 7000 SW Grad:!, Way ,atzti Revitosl, WA 98055 242304 9027 01 ti _ t6 c--- _T-•,,,,,,,,.,..... 13 WRITER -1:111 9 VI AA •u) NI d '0, Gti�Y °N.4 �Ni NT7-- oe NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 1997 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF/UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE DESCRIPTION: The applicant,Roger Pecsok of Opus Northwest,proposes to develop a 111,000 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also Include 52 dock- high truck doors and four(4)on-grade truck doors. GENERAL LOCATION: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: N/A PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager, Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on December 22,1997. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on January 06,1998,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave.South. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date Indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Ms.Henning at 277-6186. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. IPLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I DATE OF APPLICATION: OCTOBER 31,1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: NOVEMBER 06,1997 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: NOVEMBER 06,1997 ��, „, ,: _.:. ),;‘,Ni.:, .:-_-..,-_,:147,--7t Rccri G41 ,03-.:A(r:‘ '. ..-:,,, ' im,):-...ts:- -Q.40..,.,.:: i:-; _ ...:it _ _ y 01 .i• 1;'; MIPlit �F GENMALOT. :s © CITY OF RENTON _ " Planning/Building/Public Works �3 a" )0 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 a .JOwl n 6411:1 • nc a i FLY AWAY INC 7421 S 180th St - �e nt,WA '8032 „ , ‘ 111, t`00E1 . .041 a NO SUCH ' -ii 1) NUMBER L____.____._.-__ ___ .______ '31' ? ��i � ii1i§1l11i,tli.fiIilidd,, idli+Ili.1l,ldeliifillifilifitzl + v �•sIvr NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 1997 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF/UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE DESCRIPTION: The applicant,Roger Pecsok of Opus Northwest,proposes to develop a 111,000 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also Include 52 dock- high truck doors and four(4)on-grade truck doors. GENERAL LOCATION: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW . STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: N/A PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager, Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on December 22,1997. This • matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on January 06,1998,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave.South. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date Indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Ms.Henning at 277-6186. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. 'PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I DATE OF APPLICATION: OCTOBER 31,1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: NOVEMBER 06,1997 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: NOVEMBER 06,1997 a n i� • .; %., vi-,) ..i..:, .....\ j;-....;N:.ly' ...,:i.:2_. i\ 1 VD., 1 .. .� r Q*' o i !till,! ..i..) Co Vim: GENMALOT. _ ,. 0 © CITY OF RENTON � �� , �,m,,---, Planning/Building/Public Works ¶ J Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 a a --Ig r zD29 ;Ii cc � a. �_; , 7r#is` 4 tRI.V%Ifl tkik BUILDING LTD PRTNRSHP \� ELAND T PO Box 80187 Seattle_WA 98108 242304 9120 07 l';� - is tn,1;�LE ,..'�m � `� �'',;_,� e> / j' \ d '-a.9 ,7•+T4• fop*,4;.i _ 'nc,„. 9 ,.5 . 'i�..�/ j j i { ( `{ ] 4 i t jj i } iI:ET��i N t .1 SEf4L.l�., (L19 .i �,i ,�' '��Zr'1.3T'i � 3ijj j) jj j{( Fj(! i j# 3;3 f i. } il�?1!?1?1FS:�?l t?1�11ti{{lilt?f�iti111t'41 t3?1,.. _a...n.........�. . fl ^''1 l iif l?? ?il?ii?:?t�?S?ii'? ??{l it V AR• •WN1 NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 1997 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF/UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE DESCRIPTION: The applicant,Roger Pecsok of Opus Northwest,proposes to develop a 111,000 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also Include 52 dock- high truck doors and four(4)on-grade truck doors. GENERAL LOCATION: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: N/A PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager, Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on December 22,1997. This • matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on January 06,1998,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave.South. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Ms.Henning at 277-6186. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. IPLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I DATE OF APPLICATION: OCTOBER 31,1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: NOVEMBER 06,1997 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: NOVEMBER 06,1997 ",!;,,...„; ' ' ;7''''.\,... ,';.'417:::::4,. .:I" ,i::-.-..., .:,,e_r . „II,. _ .1 u lam' a�l' '\ 1 VI ',.-CD - .L.4i. ' w __ IM __ IM , �'� _ tom: j_ _G , ", . ' Q ' Rio � 3rtl •LOA t• yam.: �i -- ,.,:- \ �r as .4 _...9 ?.''•I`` _ • �,. ,/ _ I � E-goo �/�l 4: Z.( (, \ <CC 6y r:a '_ice•: GENMALOT. t? • • • ' <} • :�. .. ..::':. .......... :<;:.:!....,... ;;: ' TOOT::"' ........::.,. ..}... ,}:4y:%:i:�:i?;:} i' { '. `v:`:::i:::iJ::.::>:'jn iiiY}'i:ii:}•. .f. ::;u...v:l,.,!..X:..•%+..:::::...d:'?r:::igia:;•>sY;::iS:::igii Y ISIO ••-}::v....•4::•ft ▪ ES`DI / .f .!'v............v:iN:::::. .w.... ,,.:,•:} : .:?:. ▪ v::::.... f...`:}vi. ......:..ti?:::iii:: .r/�.:iY:..r:/+.. �.} P OP:ERTY OWNERS : T0 F S:URRO.0 N DI N G ,:.....R }....... Y.: .:}}._,.:.:. , :IiiirTire:6418, I .... ..... ..... ............ :.:.:.; ::':•:..:......... •.}:4'•�:v,.}'Ji.•v.Qvr.•�A\ .:.::4Yi}ii:•i•......... :{{S:r�i'.�ti?^"r ��:+• .. ,:.w�tl��n:300}.feet of.the:subect s to:.:::..:::.�}.;:.:.. . : .. ...':�: ..:.4'::v=:Yr.:::!rr i s:'..•:•.:.!4:ii -.v+i:.:.::-: ::::..:.....i•.v:.:. ..:!i::::-:.v nf.:r,..::{4:!ri.::,.!:. PROJECT NAME: - ORTII 445 - UPPER- Inc v Rd WelXeinous.e., APPLICATION NO: Lop,. •°I"\ • 1(e 4 s SA.-H , I✓ The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • • PLEASE SEE ATTACHED LIST . I t• • 1997 DE'✓ELUN;v 64 t rL��NNING CITY OF RENTON (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) 6 • • (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification I, e14- et1nesf-(xrI , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: 1' °tiros ❑ City of Renton Technical Services Rec• •, ...,,, ''��S Title ompany Records ;r ? K' ounty Assessors Records in - Signed Date I A .(Applicant) NOTARY ATTESTED:. Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notaby Public, Irian fo hin the State of Wasgton, residing at on the —day of -C- f�I , 19Li-1•-. Sign l / AberWI(-{ ( j&uiy' (Nolic) ... ....:.::.:.:.:::...:::...:�............:.:. f R n n.Use :.;:.:..:.>::.:.:::.::::... .. :>:: :>:.::.;;:::::.:<:::::>;:>::>::>::;:.::;::;::>;::: •<:::>:::«:: For C�tv o e to :.::::::.:.:.::::::::...:.:.:: ATION OFIMAIL NG.. ::'<.:`,. .,. C ERTIFICAT O 0 irop ppli i n vv r `ma ed to' i . ."�.�`f`tle o osed'a cat o e e'i �ta n ces o �;' • , .,.::<.:. >,. : ::>.::.::;::..::.::. erebycert fyt:...t of r. er owner.:on: ':.I .."'.;. "� :>.:::::.:;:::..... >;:: : :;: : :.: :. each,liste :p.;:4P.:.:;�Y�.; : ;.:: ...::..:..::......::..:.::.. .... . Signed : �.If►�1�,�•......� �-..':.:.:.;::;:::>::;:.;>:>;>:;,::::' ::;:; Date . �...::.: '1.....::.:: ...... ... .: .. .. .:... ..;.:::::::: : ..... : .... c• .q v A GFE T ;:Subscribed;an ;`sworn before me, a;Notary;Public,in:a.nd for:the State of:Washington... +. sidir tj at l 41 .:; '�i. ''"on the day of L131l.�: ,{1,9.E lia o p I stprop.doc yif • �'�" REV 07/95 MARILYN KAMCHEFF 2 COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 • Transnation Title Bellevue Customer Service 188 106th Ave NE#660 Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 646-8795 Standard Farm Owner : Fly Away Inc Parcel# : 000020 0001 05 Site : 7421 S 180th St Kent 98032 Sale Date : 04/30/92 Mail : 7421 S 180th St Kent Wa 98032 Sale Price : $188,700 Full Use : 932 Vacant,Industrial,1 To 5 Acres Asd.V : $58,900 Lgl : BLK 0001 LOT 000020 HENRY ADAMS Q : NW S : 36 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 8.41 YB: Ph: Owner : Metro Parcel# : 242304 9006 06 Site : 1200 Monster Rd SW Renton 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 821 2nd Ave Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price : Use : 622 Ind,Utilities,Public,Garage/Electri Asd.V : $14,194,500 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 6 POR OF LOTS 2. Q : NW S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : -Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 39.00 YB: Ph: 206-625-4500 Owner : Metro Parcel# : 242304 9006 06 Site : 1200 Monster Rd SW Renton 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 821 2nd Ave Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price : Use : 622 Ind,Utilities,Public,Garage/Electri Asd.V : $14,194,500 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 6 POR OF LOTS 2, Q : NW S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 39.00 YB: Ph: 206-6254500 Owner : Metro Parcel# : 242304 9006 06 Site : 1200 Monster Rd SW Renton 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 821 2nd Ave Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price : Use : 622 Ind,Utilities,Public,Garage/Electri Asd.V : $14,194,500 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 6 POR OF LOTS 2, Q : NW S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 39.00 YB: Ph: 206-625-4500 Owner : Metro Parcel# : 242304 9006 06 Site : 1200 Monster Rd SW Renton 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 821 2nd Ave Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price : Use : 622 Ind,Utilities,Public,Garage/Electri Asd.V : $14,194,500 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 6 POR OF LOTS 2, Q : NW S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 39.00 YB: Ph: 206-625-4500 Owner : Jefferson Smurfit Corp Parcel# : 242304 9008 04 Site : 7001 143rd P1 NE Redmond 98052 Sale Date : Mail : PO Box 479 Renton Wa 98057 Sale Price : Use : 611 Ind,Manufacturing,Paperboard Boxes Asd.V : $4,298,800 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 8 POR OF NW 1/4 Q : NW S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: Stories: 1 BldgSF: 147,300 Ac: 10.16 IB:1956 Ph: Owner : Municipality-Metro Seattle Parcel# : 242304 9078 09 Site : 1000 Monster Rd SW Renton 98055 Sale Date : 04/05/84 Mail : 821 2nd Ave Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price : Use : 921 Vacant,Commercial,Less Than 1 Acre Asd.L' : $115,000 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 78 BEG ON E LN Q : NW S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: .4c: .87 YB: Ph: Owner : King County Parcel# : 242304 9081 04 Site : 1200 Monster Rd SW Renton 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 821 2nd Ave Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price : Use : 622 Ind,Utilities,Public,Garage/Electri Asd V : $68,700 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 81 BEG ONE LN Q : NW S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .52 YB: Ph: 206-296-0100 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable.But is.Vot Guaranteed. • Transnation Title Bellevue Customer Service 188 106th Ave NE#660 Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 646-8795 Standard Farm Owner : Metro Parcel# : 242304 9097 06 Site : 1200 Monster Rd SW Renton 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 821 2nd Ave Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price : Use : 622 Ind,Utilities,Public,Garage/Electri Asd.17 : $1,406,600 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 97 AN IRREGULAR Q : NE S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 10.76 YB: Ph: 206-625-4500 Owner : City Of Renton Parcel# : 242304 9112 07 Site : 1310 SW Grady Way Renton 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price : Use : 946 Misc,Greenbelts Asd.1/ : $72,800 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 112 POR NE 1/4- Q : NE S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .55 YB: Ph: Owner : Metro Parcel# : 242304 9114 05 Site : 1101 Monster Rd SW Renton 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 821 2nd Ave#M 122 Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price : Use : 932 Vacant,Industrial,1 To 5 Acres Asd.I' : $400,800 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 114 BAAP ON N LN Q : NW S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: i Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 3.68 YB: Ph: Owner : Blume Garrison Partnership Parcel# : 242304 9123 04 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : Mail : 2825 E Lake Ave E#310 Seattle Wa 98102 Sale Price : Use : 933 Vacant,Industrial,5 To 10 Acres Asd.G" : $425,300 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 123 POR OF NW Q :NW S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 8.50 YB: Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable.But Is Not Guaranteed. Transnation Title • Bellevue Customer Service 188 106th Ave NE#660 Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 646-8795 Standard Farm Owner : Municipality Of Metropolitan Seattle Parcel# : 242304 9004 08 Site : 1301 SW Grady Way Renton 98055 ,Sale Date : 08/05/92 Mail : 821 2nd Ave Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price : Use : 931 Vacant,Industrial,Less Than 1 Acre Asd.V : $170,700 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 4 PORTION OF SW Q : NE S : 24 T: 23N R :04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .82 YB: Ph: Owner : Jefferson Smurfit Corp Parcel# : 242304 9008 04 Site : 7001 143rd P1 NE Redmond 98052 Sale Date : Mail : PO Box 479 Renton Wa 98057 Sale Price : Use : 611 Ind.Manufacturing,Paperboard Boxes Asd V : $4,298,800 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 8 POR OF NW 1/4 Q : NW S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / Stories: 1 B1dgSF: 147,300 Ac: 10.16 YB:1956 Ph: Owner : Nielson Raymond Parcel# : 242304 9027 01 Site : 7000 SW Grady Way Sale Date : 03/15/90 Mail : 7000 SW Grady Way Wa Sale Price : Use : 934 Vacant,Industrial,10 To 20 Acres Asd.V : $727,600 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 27 BNRR R/W Q : NW S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: Stories: BIdgSF Ac: 11.13 YB: Ph: Owner : King County Parcel# : 242304 9030 06 Site : 15000 Interurban Ave S Tukwila Sale Date : ,Mail : 500 K C Admin Bldg Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price : Use : 349 Rec.Parks,Zoos.Arboretum Asd.V : $259.400 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 30 POR GL 1 &5 Q :NW S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 1.98 YB: Ph: Owner : City Of Renton Parcel# : 242304 9112 07 Site : 1310 SW Grady Way Renton 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price : Use : 946 Misc.Greenbelts Asd V : $72,800 , Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 112 POR NE 1/4- Q : NE S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .55 YB: Ph: Owner : Metro Parcel# : 242304 9114 05 Site : 1101 Monster Rd SW Renton 98055 .Sale Date : Mail : 821 2nd Ave#M 122 Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price : Use : 932 Vacant,Industrial,1 To 5 Acres Asd.l' : $400,800 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 114 BAAP ON N LN 0 : NW S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 3.68 YB: Ph: Owner : Municipality Of Metro Seatt Parcel# : 242304 9117 02 Site : 1100 Monster Rd SW Renton 98055 Sale Date : 09/16/92 Mail : 1100 Monster Rd SW Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price : Use : 931 Vacant,Industrial,Less Than 1 Acre Asd.G' : $122,100 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 117 POR BN RR Q : NW S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .91 YB: Ph: Owner : Eland Building Ltd Prtnrshp Parcel# : 242304 9120 07 Site : 589 Monster Rd SW Renton 98055 Sale Date : 06/29/90 .hail : PO Box 80187 Seattle Wa 98108 Sale Price : $482.405 Use : 506 Ind,Warehouse,100k+Sqft Asd.V : $8,500,000 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 120 POR OF NW Q :NW S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: Stories: 1 BldgSF: 223,850 Ac: 10.82 IB:1990 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable.But Is Not Guaranteed. Transnation Title Bellevue Customer Service 188 106th Ave NE#660 Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 646-8795 Standard Farm Owner : B&G Renton Prtnrshp Parcel# : 242304 9121 06 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 06/29/90 Mail : 146 N Canal St#310 Seattle Wa 98103 Sale Price : $332,327 Use : 933 Vacant,Industrial,5 To 10 Acres Asd.I" : $930,000 Lgl : STR 242304 TAXLOT 121 POR OF NW Q : NW S : 24 T: 23N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 7.11 YB: Ph: Owner :Renton Fish&Game Club Inc Parcel# : 242305 9002 09 Site : 17500 SE 144th St Renton 98059 Sale Date Mail : 17500 SE 144th St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.I' : $180,730 Lgl : STR 242305 TAXLOT 2 PP ACT Q :NE S : 24 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 1 Bth F3H: 1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 610 Ac: 38.33 YB:1946 Ph: 253-226-1563 Owner : Renton Fish&Game Club Inc Parcel# : 242305 9002 09 Site : 17500 SE 144th St Renton 98059 Sale Date Mail : 17500 SE 144th St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $180,730 Lgl : STR 242305 TAXLOT 2 PP ACT Q : NE S : 24 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / /2 Stories: 1 BldgSF: 780 Ac: 38.33 YB:1954 Ph: 253-226-1563 Owner :Renton Fish&Game Club Inc Parcel# : 242305 9002 09 Site : 17500 SE 144th St Renton 98059 Sale Date Mail : 17500 SE 144th St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.I' : $180,730 Lgl : STR 242305 TAXLOT 2 PP ACT Q : NE S : 24 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: 2 % / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2.080 Ac: 38.33 YB:1954 Ph: 253-226-1563 Owner : Renton Fish&Game Club Inc Parcel# : 242305 9002 09 Site : 17500 SE 144th St Renton 98059 Sale Date : Mail : 17500 SE 144th St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.I" : $180,730 Lgl : STR 242305 TAXLOT 2 PP ACT Q : NE S : 24 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H: 1 / " Stories: 1 BldgSF: 730 Ac: 38.33 YB:1978 Ph: 253-226-1563 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. • MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN S JEI.1~L.RSON SMURFIT CORP Raymond Nielson 821 2nd Ave PO Box 479 7000 SW Grady Way Seattle. WA 98104 Renton, WA 98057 , WA 242304 9004 08 242304 9008 04 242304 9027 01 KING COUNTY CITY OF RENTON Metro 500 K C Admin Bldg 200 Mill Ave S 821 2nd Ave#M 122 Seattle, WA 98104 Renton, WA 98055 Seattle. WA 98104 242304 9030 06 242304 9112 07 242304 9114 05 MUNICIPALITY OF METRO SEATT ELAND BUILDING LTD PRTNRSHP B&G Renton Prtnrshp 1100 Monster Rd SW PO Box 80187 146 N Canal St#310 Renton, WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98108 Seattle, WA 98103 242304 9117 02 242304 9120 07 242304 9121 06 RENTON FISH&GAME CLUB INC RENTON FISH&GAME CLUB INC RENTON FISH&GAME CLUB INC 17500 SE 144th St 17500 SE 144th St 17500 SE 144th St Renton, WA 98059 Renton.WA 98059 Renton. WA 98059 242305 9002 09 242305 9002 09 242305 9002 09 'RENTON FISH&GAME CLUB INC Metro FLY AWAY INC 17500 SE 144th St 821 2nd Ave 7421 S 180th St Renton, WA 98059 Seattle, WA 98104 Kent, WA 98032 242305 9002 09 242304 9006 06 000020 0001 05 BLUME GARRISON PARTNERSHIP Seattle Municipality-Metro Metro 2825 E Lake Ave E#310 821 2nd Ave 821 2nd Ave Seattle, WA 98102 Seattle. WA 98104 Seattle, WA 98104 242304 9123 04 242304 9078 09 242304 9097 06 KING COUNTY 821 2nd Ave Seattle, WA 98104 242304 9081 04 + p rpe • 5' ... iv NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: NOVEMBER 06,1997 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF/UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE DESCRIPTION: The applicant,Roger Pecsok of Opus Northwest,proposes to develop a 111,000 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also Include 52 dock- high truck doors and four(4)on-grade truck doors. • GENERAL LOCATION: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: WA PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager, • Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on December 22,1997.This ' matter is also scheduled fora public hearing on January 08,1398,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave.South.If you are Interested In attending the hearing,please contact the Development • Services Division,277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled.If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date Indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner.If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mall,contact Ms.Henning at 277-6188.Anyone who submits written comments will • automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. IPLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CAUJNG FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I • DATE OF APPUCATION: OCTOBER 31,1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: NOVEMBER 06,1997 • DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: NOVEMBER 06,1997 • 4 ',., �= .` • - ILA, 111 .\ ir i. .- Ar '- le" �_ Y •�'f I r:-. 3t� c1 CERTIFICATION • • 1, ciiii rYl ions h , hereby certify that 3 copiesdescribed of the abovepropertyon document were seti'b me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the • Signed: {4'1 m 1/Vilit i'l STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • 'i IC 4"'cl4f Y OF KING • ) SS 10 • '� 01,�,Itlify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that,�9y� d ». hi and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free nd voluntary act for the Uses �, .4Ig n pl t us instrument9 ''' p 9i+>t�}pur loses mentioned in the instrument. r 1 Q.yatt: o/Q 11 1 Zj /G197 Nota; .Pub Fubli and for he Stale of ington Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF My appointment exp(�1�1MISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 ,-.orAar,cti.c G,��Y 0 _Fe ,tt N'r NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 1997 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF/UPPER MONSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE DESCRIPTION: The applicant,Roger Pecsok of Opus Northwest,proposes to develop a 111,000 square foot warehouse and office facility on a 7.11 acre site. The project requires environmental review and a public hearing to consider the site plan. Parking for 87 vehicles would be provided. The project would also include 52 dock- high truck doors and four(4)on-grade truck doors. GENERAL LOCATION: 1200 Block of Monster Road SW STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: N/A PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager, Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on December 22,1997. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on January 06,1998,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave.South. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Ms.Henning at 277-6186. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. IPLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: OCTOBER 31,1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: NOVEMBER 06,1997 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: NOVEMBER 06,1997 • ' dory"`�� IFI\ '`�•�,. •I 1 mI wwa \, ( 4' I -Y;.-, NCO , �r� _ IM _'it 1, _ _-_... \•\ l IM 1 a ?\ ,ItE -i 1.nanw ~'P I r_ aa1- • •Y-I log•,.. \P:. 7*.r'\'- .: - r". i,\ j 'ice r I GENMALOT. k CIT' OF RENTON dot \ Planning/Building/Public Works De artment ..LLP Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 6, 1997 Mr. Roger Pecsok Opus Northwest LLC 200- 112th Avenue NE, Suite 205 Bellevue,WA 98004 SUBJECT: Upper Monster Road Warehouse Project No. LUA-97-164,SA-H,ECF Dear Mr. Pecsok: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton'has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. ` It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on December 2, 1997. Prior to that review,you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. The date of Tuesday, January 6, 1998 at 9:00 AM, has been set for a public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner,will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. Please contact me, at(425)277-6186, if you have any questions. Sincerely, V 1Jv c:j!:9\ , '8111114) Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc: B&G Renton Associates/Owner IcrpTLTD.Dne 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer • • • `.± �i 4^ '�'" tt:✓ .� /y<� �'' // �i 1 yC 1 r/V �.. i. /,/$ og/ \.`,y :s�/ s::• .. ;i s?ors4 , +: �� !3 /i::'+: qi:l •"'�//,rk>- �-',s",-�o4c �'t � ! // r 4///r'�.h 'r/f�ii^:e'C% C?.Xi / C �. ,�/� / •� �'S,/ems• ._� % %'i .. y_-.. ;� �Ci.... •%4:. ty/R / ��. -..,,v«ryywgt.,,9,,.3`w,,,,. l+-��. d/cs��"d,,�/`�`�iy i. �yjr '�.� .•�. ... '.,.:Y:h�:A;x;,. �:.>: •'�.r«,w..r;:;� : ./ EVELOPMEN7'..SER •S�p� � � -�� � n �� �� _yi/r.°.r.;;o:-y,-.:ny,•��.'.'xis;,,,,}}}} / r .,� if' w %s'c w•• ..,'•�,+' e. • •}.. :� r�\ - v% ::.:.;:. l '� .. '0"a3�.,¢".�C'•�'•%4!/?'�`t•,�lyi%a►�i:. ��X -F q. ��: �� �" '%Y: ''� r/�a�.�D��� �ox.w%�� _ ';�.•.,..-"✓.:;'�:"h .r7. ::q,-•ar;.;i' ..:'•''lY: .t:. ; 17.. ,/,,,:.. .; '•:*F::/i:::!.q1:;:i/r^ °.k,' :•i::-:.',•:. ,: ..-�.,•..< � :l!::�i.3'.:. Y,w.: y,;i:: �.j: ;' ° .x: %ir �;�//n•cyb�;y :;a':i•-. " t--Es':%'+•'.;�:?..p;;;...;@:9a .Y,/�f. .(; ;w :., •? :Y.•l ./`v,;% / ..y,,i.:';'+'P•r •o...; • .• .- . .. -_,} .} -.MM f AS- DER :•.APP: •• Z: J %,.::y fy d w 0- . .. i moo. : •'' , y :N?- :c !// by x�:C'S?,ly,-.%y4 : ! ,.. > '....'3w,.•a..-,... ', • •.;✓i'%:- Sn,TjG':.:3r::•:•',.// F ,,,?, // <"¢'V' �.'f,.�. .�q ;r,Qc«.Y,�/.r..,,, 'ri' � Q .i..�'.- , �:}.�5.`:�.'� :..A,v. ..wv..,:•:H•..q y::.�•:..n,�. �inv:LH.�i�r,�.Y.r-..%:. �n�. V/• .- ..•-<. . .:.:::.::,,,-:PROPERtX OWNER(§), >' ,:>; �.• <g-. "ri' . .b,..xw-.,,,,.....,,... Note:aft .r.h morerthaij.'on.b al'"ow"ner'pii ttacl an.�ioonal Y:� ><"„PR R N� •OJECT� NFO �MATZO •�-�• notanzad Master Appliaepori for'eiiiirOwr e * >•',-.' : a:'`:<^;'-./:-"%r:-'': PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: B & G Renton Associates vpp- M ors vQd. W �/ sci PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: 1 I ADDRESS: 2825 Eastlake Avenue East Suite 115 1,)-x)c. a 1 cci _ May)si-r,4,p4 . tAl CITY: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Seattle, WA ZIP: 98102 2423049121 _+. I TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): (206) 324-1800 + :._- Undeveloped > .:-.. .-i<-.. .-. C41101 if of 70t1.tlian owner}: N :;: NAME: Roger Pecsok PROPOSED LAND USES: 111,000 S.F. Warehouse and Office facility COMPANY(if applicable): Opus Northwest LLC EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Employment Area — Valley (EAV) ADDRESS: 200 112th Avenue NE Suite 205 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (If applicable):1 Not Applicable I CITY: Bellevue, WA ZIP: 98004 EXISTING ZONING: 1 • • Medium Industrial (IM) TELEPHONE NUMBER: I (425) 453-4100 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): ..::..... Not 1 RECEI .- :CONTACT:PE ';-,I"-- ;;::v:;:.:; ;. Appl'cable NAME: Roger Pecsok SITE AREA(SQ.FT.OR ACREAGE): �" 199T 309,997 S.F. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON } COMPANY(if applicable): Opus Northwest LLC PROJECT VALUE: $2,775,000 • (ADDRESS: 200 112th Avenue NE IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? Suite 205 _ No CITY: Bellevue, WA ZIP: 98004 • IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 453-4100 No ,.. , 75,T ;,„ C•:w.Ac_,,4, % ✓. :H<S..`-:`-,.-F+IK Y. ' .,= t:5 G7.7 _,,.f �:: (� ... /rC: • ia it':,,,.., ? ^ y� l - 4 { E Y ,=- 5 a1,4,FM.4.° ..' ..3,F .h .-' . ._ .,ot..l _ ..—,,,.. 4 «w-r. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED 3.,r.yx. :•-:."• 1$w Yho-' 4.,'•- .::: - B.""R3 v.ac k ya l 4 p;11✓swx rg}r. Wr= .i 9.u,+ "" " y ., C4.., rJ ... �c J A' a. w " �Yy+MrvwN 4-4'.4ii. t ,-". l "` •V ' ' W.w ° rw N0ziw-0M�-r • f ZQ Nk r - 04 .w.fM y i',1u _ 2_I� 0 x i" ••ci aFT:. a . -'4 , . G ^ r j�.v x �t(...]..: N >. . h�o '5�.�... .:"P"'' 4,j ^ ere..tx-• k•'006wu•1•• ' • • ANNEXATION $ _ — SUBDIVISION: —COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _REZONE 3 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ • — _SPECIAL PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ —TEMPORARY PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT 9 NDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ i PRELIMINARY PLAT $ ›ZiITE PLAN APPROVAL &—D .00 FINAL PLAT $ _GRADE & FILL PERMIT 9 r (NO. CU. YDS: I PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) —PREUMINARY _WAIVER FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUT INE TINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT 9 —BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $N9 Charm' ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $59B©O REVISION $ r �.a it / !+sri•?`'� ����. x :°`�, �u.1 �v..,NeZaie..�..°,isuxw.K".' .......:.:'^ :w„w�.�.w.,,....:......�._._.�,.«..,v..,�.,.;ri�. I,(Print Name)13Atr eeyaLST ao .declare that I sm(please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this appffeation, the authorized representative to act for the property owner Viv�ch proof of authorization).and that the foregoing statements and ens ere herein contained and the Information herewith su• • { • , IA true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. a° % 41 ���ATTEST: Subsonbed end sworn to before me,a Notary Public,in and el •/ _ for the State of aiding at (Name of Ovvrte -e•re !five) .• 1 on the 2day of A. ct/ 4r S( li�f�r tam (Signature of Owneerr//RRepresentative) �, N•••«;'" "� i f yi%' /,'Azu(y O 1► is tC drit, rn eso (Sip re of No Public) Ila > r•a. Jar Ka'va?/ - M� �K �SJ,"..+.�{"`h'i y,= y,,z ....; r- 'tS vl C"�ZL"wu I •l �5�+sa. 6ff Jc•+Sw`r 4 v++cn.s((.,, w w: �,�/Y4�y�w� w+w.o•' M+h,��, �.y{•.u � .�r�ay'p "'M1 5. 't> " y L.. z.`.. H.N . N••. ~ • q . MJ Mi'-6 to ve ezG`R1.4.44 +2:4 ` l wy *< *M�•::o s i,° •" '.,f�:xmwrew.''� „ rib tyr wwti"•4 1;1�ar' '7 J' 7"p 1 S�"i %•j..4M...:��"�""...��� «« �i L,r • �ty.tI ".` ,'emu".+.:.`; i v'.nc.�. a rJmo '+� , 4 f ''-''" 4^. . °..ice,w. . .4 :� �i.S ".% qh=�R�^ LZyriw.tF..r.w i'. . „.. ti+•� ww f y ;NY Tiwr y 54:z ,ro .� -td�sr .n .M:... ' Q9"a..xur n . haw � . a � - rci.•a1:� , r�r;�a` MASTERAP.DOC REVISED B/974 ®,,. .�+ 0. 3a- LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR NORTH 405 - UPPER SITE : STR 242304 MAX LOT 121 POR OF NW 1/4 - BEG QUARTER COR BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 & 24 T3 N 8 7-2 5-43 W 1214 PT TO WLY MGN OF CO RD NC 8 CEAPLZS MONSTER RD SW 4 NOW KNOWN AS STEIL BILL RD TR S 32-29-51 E 85.34 FT TE ON CURVE TO RGT RAD OF 256.43 FT DISTANCE OF 139 .14 FT TE S 01-24-51 E 263 FT TO TPOB T3 S 88-35-09 W 436.55 FT TT3 S 02-33-13 W 115.03 FT TE S 70-05-34 W 95.47 FT TR S 88-37-17 W 105.38 FT TR S 04-53-17 E 410.23 FT TO NWLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND D_SC m UNDER RECORDING NO 8606190933 TN N 46-16-56 E 202.01 FT TN S 53-39-22 E 445.21 PT TO WLY MGN OF MARI2S MONSTER RD SW TN NLY ALG SD WLY MGY TO TPOB - Ate} PARC , 3 OF ITNIZZCORDED SURVEY REVISED MAR N 22, 1990 October 21, 1997 Jennifer Toth Henning Senior Planner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Ms. Toth Henning: Opus Northwest LLC is the contracted owner of the property located near 601 Monster Road in Renton, Washington. The tax id number for the parcel is 242304 9121. Opus Northwest LLC has full authority to apply for any permits regarding the development of this parcel. Sincerely yours, Gregory G. Blume cc: Roger Pecsok '.1.'S \`,T[ \ 1. •,'f.: '. F l �1 1 r _z. t'. ',',H I' n) ),,1, ,(, H0(1 1,\ , 'ri', ni NORTH 405 - UPPER SITE Project Narrative: The North 405 -Upper Site project is a Medium Industrial project proposed to be built on approximately seven (7) acres of land adjacent to Monster Road on tax lot #242304 9121. The parcel is currently an undeveloped lot without any residential or commercial improvements. There are mostly gentle slopes through out the site except on a small section to the West where the property slopes down to an adjacent lot. There are no surrounding properties which will have views impacted by the proposed development. The proposed project is a warehouse facility of approximately 111,270 square feet. The building will have concrete tilt-up walls with approximately a twenty eight foot (28') high exterior. There will be approximately fifty two (52) dock high doors, four (4) on grade doors and eighty seven (87) parking spaces. The site will have two access points to Monster Road, one to the North and one to the South. Landscaping and property buffers will be installed in compliance with all City standards. 4pp rx . D5,900 Gi It 01 ,?CNN p�vEG \ �o a�'10 NORTH 405 - UPPER Project Narrative: The North 405 -Upper Site project is a Medium Industrial project proposed to be built on approximately seven (7) acres of land adjacent to Monster Road on tax lot#242304 9121. The parcel is currently an undeveloped lot without any residential or commercial improvements. There are mostly gentle slopes through out the site except on a small section to the West where the property slopes down to an adjacent lot. There are no surrounding properties which will have views impacted by the proposed development. The proposed project is a warehouse facility of approximately 111,270 square feet. The building will have concrete tilt-up walls with approximately a twenty eight foot (28') high exterior. There will be approximately fifty two (52) dock high doors, four (4) on grade doors and eighty seven (87) parking spaces. The site will have two access points to Monster Road, one to the North and one to the South. Landscaping and property buffers will be installed in compliance with all City standards. 5jt �Oc9 (r6/17/ 1-friA ,Ls of ffia/-??9 przytecccePi RECEIVFID OCT 3 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RE'NTON NORTH 405 - UPPER SITE Construction Mitigation Description: Construction for the North 405 - Upper Site project is planned to start in December of 1997 and last for approximately six months. Construction will not be phased. Construction will occur between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. Primary access to the site for construction vehicles will be through Monster Road, Oaksdale Avenue and Grady Way to Highway 405. All cut or fill material will be native or from the adjacent site, which is being permitted concurrently with this application, which means off site hauling will not be required. An erosion and sedimentation control plan will be in place to minimize impacts from site work operations. Standard construction measures will be implemented and City requirements met with regard to all earthwork and construction activity. There are no residential neighbors in the surrounding area, only industrial users who will not be impacted by noise or vehicle traffic to the site. 1997 06,,CINOFZ ONNING N , 11111011 ,�;. ;k'::, ,? : October 22, 1997 4101111111111 tea: ,Ie.:r''rtf: luellift :. ,� RECF VE SHAPIRO s . -�-_ Mr. Roger Pecsok S. .i i O C I A T E OPUS Northwest LLC OCT fi 1 1997 y ._, 200-112th AVE. NE Suite 205 ``"'• ,,,,4 - Bellevue WA 98004 JEVELUNivitNl PLANNING �: rt " CITY OF RENTON } , Re: Wetland delineation of the North 405 upper and lower sites in Renton,Washington p.*%.; - Dear Roger. >.-;.r ',• :.,:, At your request, Shapiro and Associates, Inc. (SHAPIRO) visited the OPUS Northwest property in the City of Renton, King County, Washington on September 25, 1997. The purpose of the visit was to identify and delineate wetland boundaries. The site is bounded 4. �_ by Monster Road on the east and south, Oaksdale Avenue S.W. to the north, and by r; ;- Burlington Northern Railroad tracks to the west and south (Township 23N, Range 4E, '�w`- Section 24). ::0:•: • The OPUS Northwest property investigated by SHAPIRO is composed of two Parcels. '.:- - Parcel A is approximately 7 acres in area and Parcel B.is approximately 8.5 acres in area. i"-_-s The present site is a portion of a larger area delineated by SHAPIRO in 1989 (SHAPIRO, =, '-^�:-. 1989. Wetland Delineation of the Container Corporation of America Site Renton, z"•''r Washington.). The wetland found in this investigation is similar to but slightly larger than t, `� that found in 1989. 4. `1 :z Methods t..- , 1nt.Tu1.r Way Wetlands on the site were identified and their boundaries established using methods ,y-.e,- ;' described in the C.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual Csaie..,4o0- '� 'x4 : (Environmental Laboratory, 1987), Fit„2 µ commonly referred to as the 1987 Manual. Wetland ;- .,= wf boundaries were marked with bright orange flagging labeled "WETLAND BOUNDARY" w"4,S.aWs,WA 98104 o a ag g and with wire stakes with red flagging. Wetland flagging was numbered in sequential r.:r'-.. order. Sample plots were established at the site. Soil was characterized by digging a hole ::::„:Telephone: '- to a depth of at least 18 inches below the ground surface. Soil layers, or horizons, were -"206.624.9190 described with regard to the soil texture, color, presence or absence of redoximorphic features (such as mottling or gley color formation), and organic matter content. All :�Facnmile: herbaceous plant species within a 5-foot radius of the soil pit were identified, and the percent of the ground each covered was estimated. All shrubs. saplings, and trees within a 206.624.1901 30-foot radius of the soil pit also were identified and their cover estimated. Data collected at each of these sample plots were recorded; data forms are attached. wE-mail: shapireeihap.com Mr. Roger Pecsok Page 2 October 22, 1997 • • Results - A review of existing literature, including the National Wetland Inventory, Renton , • Washington Quadrangle (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1988), and the King County Wetlands Inventory (King County Environmental Division, 1990), indicates that the site was not identified as a wetland at the time of the surveys. The King County Wetlands Inventory does not map wetlands less than 1 acre in size. The Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington (United States Department of Agriculture: Soil Conservation Service, 1973) has mapped the site as containing five distinct soil series. Beausite gravelly sandy loam(6-15% slopes), Beausite gravelly sandy loam (15-30% slopes), Puget silty clay loam, Woodinville silt loam, and Urban land (soil that has been modified by disturbance and additions of fill material). Of these the Puget silty clay loam and Woodinville silt loam have been classified as hydric according to Hydric Soils of the United States (United States Department of Agriculture: Soil Conservation Service. 1985). There are two parcels in the investigated area, Parcel A and Parcel B. Parcel A is predominately a mowed grass field approximately 7 acres in area. Parcel A is bounded by Monster Road on the east and south, to the north is a commercial lot with a one story warehouse. Parcel A is relatively level in the north and northeast area of the site and then • gradually slopes uphill to the south and the west. Near the top of the southwestern slope where the grass vegetation ends is a forested area that serves as the western perimeter of the investigated area of Parcel A. The northern side of the forested hill is the property of OPUS Northwest LLC, the southern side of the forested hill is King County Department of Metropolitan Services (METRO) property and is enclosed by a chain link fence. The ground along the fenced boundary has been recently cleared. A north-to-south trending cleared ravine approximately 15 feet wide, 20 feet deep, and 200 feet long is at the top of the slope on the OPUS Northwest LLC property. The forested hill bisects the investigated areas of Parcel A and Parcel B. Parcel B in the northwest section of the site, is approximately eight acres in area, and is bounded on the north, west and south by Burlington Northern Railroad tracks. The eastern border of Parcel B is the toe of the slope of the forested hillside. The vegetative habitats at Parcel B include deciduous forest, scrub- shrub wetland, emergent wetland, grassland, and open water area. The topography of Parcel B is relatively level with some troughs and berms occurring throughout the site. A section in the western area of Parcel B approximately 200 feet long and 60 feet wide was recently scraped of vegetation and approximately 4 to 8 inches of soil. Mr. Roger Pecsol Page 3 October 22, 1997 Sample Plot one was established approximately 150 feet south of the northern border and 50 feet east of the western border of Parcel B. Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) is the dominant vegetation with trace amounts of spotted cat's ear(Hypochaeris radicata). The soils are gray (2.5Y 5/1 and 2.5Y 6/1) silt loam and silty clay loam. The mottles are brown to light olive brown (7.5YR 4/4 and 2.5Y 5/6), common and medium. The soils match the mapped Puget silty clay loam series. The soil was moist throughout the horizon. The vegetation, soil, and hydrology at Sample Plot one are hydric according to wetland classification criteria. Sample Plot two was established approximately 150 feet south of sample plot one and 50 feet east of the western border. Approximately 60% of the ground has been cleared of vegetation. Reed canarygrass is the dominant existing vegetation with plowed remains of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor) in the surrounding area. The soils are dark grayish brown and light brownish gray (10YR 4/2 and 2.5Y 6/2) silty clay loam and loam. The mottles are dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) common and coarse. The mottles did not occur in the top 10 inches of the profile. There were no hydric features in the upper 10 inches of soil. The vegetation is the only parameter met at Sample Plot two according to wetland classification criteria. Sample Plot three was established approximately 25 feet northeast of Sample Plot two. The dominant herbaceous vegetation is common velvet-grass (Holcus lanatus) with patches of of reed canarygrass, Canadian thistle (Cirsium arvense) and bare ground. The shrub vegetation is Himalayan blackberry and black cottonwood (Populus balsimifera var. trichocarpa) are on the perimeter of the sample plot. The soils are dark grayish brown and light brownish gray (10YR 4/2 and 2.5Y 6/2) silty clay loam and loam. The mottles are dark yellowish brown and yellowish brown (10YR 4/4 and 10YR 5/4) common to many and fine to coarse. The soil was moist throughout the horizon. The vegetation. soil, and hydrology at Sample Plot three are hydric according to wetland classification criteria. Sample Plot four was established in the northeast area of Parcel B on the bank of the open water area approximately 50 feet west of the base of the forested hill and 250 feet from the northern border. The dominant herbaceous vegetation is reed canarygrass with patches of cattail (Tvpha latifolia), soft rush (Juncus effusus), nodding beggar-tick(Bidens cernua), and bare ground. The shrub and tree vegetation included bittersweet nightshade (Solanum dulcctmara) and Pacific willow (Salir lasiandra)1 The soils are very dark grayish brown and grayish brown (10YR 3/2 and 2.5Y 5/2) silt loam. The mottles are yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) common and coarse. The soil was saturated at the surface and the surrounding Mr. Roger Pecsol Page 4 October 22, 1997 area had approximately four inches of inundation. The vegetation,soil, and hydrology at Sample Plot four are hydric according to wetland classification criteria. A wetland was identified in Parcel B in the northern area of the site. This wetland is approximately two acres in area and would be classified as a palustrine emergent. and scrub-shrub wetland. Based on the City of Renton Sensitive Areas Ordinance (undated), the wetland could be classified as a Category III Wetland because it is larger than 5,000 square feet and has received extensive human disturbance. This wetland was designated Wetland A and flagged from Al to A45 in a continuous loop. Wetland A is approximately 500 feet long and 400 feet wide at the longest points. Wetland A runs along the base of the forested hillside on the east border and adjacent to the Burlington Northern railroad tracks on the northern border from the northeast to northwest corners of Parcel B. Wetland A crosses Parcel B from the northwest corner to the southeast border in a triangular fashion. A portion of the western border of Wetland A traverses the scraped area of Parcel B. Wetland determinations of the scraped area was based on the presence of hydric soils within 10 inches of the original ground surface assuming an estimated four inches of soil was removed during scraping. Sample Plot five was established in Parcel A approximately 100 feet west of Monster Road and 200 feet south of the northern border of the site. The dominant herbaceous vegetation is bluegrass (Poa sp.) and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). The soils are very dark • grayish brown (10YR 3/2) loam. There are no mottles and no hydrological features. The vegetation, soil, and hydrology at Sample Plot five do not qualify as hydric according to wetland classification criteria. Sample Plot six was established in Parcel A approximately 100 feet west of Monster Road and 200 feet southwest of sample plot five. The dominant herbaceous vegetation is common velvet-grass and tall fescue with trace amounts of soft rush. The soils are very dark grayish brown (1 OYR 3/2) loam. There are no mottles and no hydrological features. A pipe was located five inches below the surface. The settling of the earth following the installation of the pipe is likely the source of the swale topography in this area of Parcel A. The vegetation is the only hydric feature at sample plot six. The soil and hydrology do not qualify as hydric according to wetland classification criteria. Conclusions SHAPIRO delineated one wetland on the OPUS Northwest site on September 25, 1997. Mr. Roger Pecsol Page 5 October 22, 1997 This wetland appears to meet the minimum criteria to be considered a jurisdictional wetland by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: the presence of wetland plants, hydric soil, and hydrology at or near the ground surface. Any development activities that may affect these wetlands likely would require authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In addition to applicable federal and state regulations, the City of Renton has regulations that pertain to the altering of wetlands. Thank you for the opportunity to prepare this material for you. If you require additional • assistance on this or any other project,please do not hesitate to call me or Mark Boule. Sincerely, SHAPIRO AND ASSOCIATES, NC. Calvin Kelly Douglas Wildlife Ecologist Christopher W. Wright Soil and Wetland Scientist • Environmental Checklist North 405, Upper Site A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: North 405, Upper Site 2. Name of applicant: Opus Northwest LLC C54°) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: °DC Roger Pecsok, Opus Northwest LLC, (425) 453-4100 v°Low es-ip? �No os 200 112th Avenue NE, Suite 205, Bellevue, WA 98004. ' or( R 4. Date checklist prepared: 10/24/97 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is estimated to begin December, 1997 and last approximately six (6) months. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A Level I Environmental Audit, Soils Report and Wetland Study have been prepared. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes explain. No 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Grade & Fill Permit, Building Permit, SEPA MDNS. 1 Environmental Checklist North 405, Upper Site 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. We propose to build one building of 111,000 square feet with approximately 88 parking spaces. The gross site area is 7 acres and is currently undeveloped. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section , township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site is Parcel 3 located at 601 Monster Road. The site is on the North side and adjacent to the Metro facility. The Tax ID # is 242304 9121. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, mountainous, other: Flat with steep slopes b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 60% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Organic sandy and clayey silts. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The site will be balanced without any importing or exporting of material. 2 Environmental Checklist North 405, Upper Site f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes. Sitework operations will be performed. An Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan will be in effect. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 90% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: An Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan will be utilized to mitigate erosion due to site work. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Typical emissions from construction equipment. The end user is unknown. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Dust abatement procedures will be utilized. 3. WATER a. Surface Water 1) Is There any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. A stormwater detention facility exists on the Parcel to the Northwest which serves the properties bound by Monster Road on the East, the railroad to the West, and Oaksdale Avenue to the North. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N/A 3 Environmental Checklist North 405, Upper Site 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, not location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No wastes will be generated. Stormwater runoff from parking areas will be routed through biofiltration. b. Ground Water 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage, industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural;etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, if so, describe. Storm water from the building rooftop and parking area will flow from the site to the regional stormwater detention facility. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Only storm water. 4 Environmental Checklist North 405, Upper Site d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Storm water calculations will be provided to confirm that the regional storm water management system has the necessary capacity for this development. The storm system shall comply with all City requirements. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain X wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Only grass, blackberry bushes and some trees will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Formal landscaping and irrigation will be done to city Standards. Existing wetlands will not be disturbed. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other None Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other None Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Do not know 5 Environmental Checklist North 405, Upper Site d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project' s energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Natural gas will be used for heating & cooling. Electricity will be used for the building systems. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: This project will comply with the current Washington State energy code standards. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Will comply with local codes. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 6 Environmental Checklist North 405, Upper Site 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise from construction equipment would occur during construction between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. The end user is unknown. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently undeveloped and not being used. Site plan approval for the adjoining parcel (Parcel 4B)to the West is being applied for concurrently with this application. A warehouse facility lies to the north, Monster Road runs parallel on the East and a Metro waste water treatment facility is to the South. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not recently c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Medium Industrial (IM) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Employment Area-Valley (EAV) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Wetlands exist on the North end of site. 7 Environmental Checklist North 405, Upper Site i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 60 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project will comply with current local standards. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Building will be approximately 28' in height with tilt up walls. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Enhanced architectural finish relative to surrounding structures and land. Landscaping will be installed to City standards. 8 Environmental Checklist North 405, Upper Site 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Parking lot lighting during night time b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Use of photometrics will keep light and glare directed onsite. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? A pedestrian path runs alongside Monster Road. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. TRANSPORTATION 9 Environmental Checklist North 405, Upper Site a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by Monster Road. Monster road is accessed by Oaksdale Avenue to the North and by Grady Way to the South. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Unknown c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Approximately 88 stalls. None will be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private)? Frontage improvements along Monster Road may need to be installed. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Railroad tracks run along the West side of the property to the West. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Approximately 542 AWD trips will be generated. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: End user is unknown. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project will add approximately 111,000 SF of occupied space within the city limits. Normal city services will need to be provided. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 10 Environmental Checklist North 405, Upper Site 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity & Telephone. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water and Sewer are provided by the City of Renton. Power and natural gas are supplied by Puget Sound Energy. Telephone service is supplied by U.S. West. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in re;:;ce upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful I- k • � losure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: 464•Ivreg Date: /d-Z7 11 'L r' TERRA ASSOCIA1 ES, Inc. • Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences V•0 �,®�$ � � � February 15, 1997 O2\) Project No.T-3453 Mr. Bart Brynestad OPUS Northwest LLC /1/E.,, 200- 112th Avenue NE,Suite 205 Bellevue, Washington 98004 'Ci a 7997 Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Study c ry*AlrpU Oaksdale Business Park R�9yTONMHG Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Brynestad: As requested, we have completed a preliminary geotechnical study of the subject site. The 14 acre site is located near the southwest intersection of Monster Road and South 143rd Street in Renton, Washington. An Easement Exhibit map dated August 22, 1991 shows that the site is comprised of two irregularly-shaped parcels of land (Parcel 3 and Parcel 4B) situated between Monster Road and the Burlington Northern Railroad line. A Vicinity Map showing the location of the site is presented on Figure 1. Our scope of work for this project included conducting surface and subsurface investigations at the site and preparing this letter. Our subsurface investigation consisted of excavating eight backhoe test pits at the site. The test pits were excavated to depths ranging from 7.5 to 12 feet below existing site grades. PROJECT DESCRIPTION We understand the project will consist of construction of a business park at the site. Conceptual site development drawings are not available at this time; however, the project will likely consist of constructing several one-story to two-story office/warehouse structures with associated access drive and parking areas. The presence of sloping terrain at the site indicates moderate grading will be required for construction of building pads and access driveways. The project may require the placement of deep utilities in order to establish utility line gradients at the site. 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 • Phone (206) 821-7777 Mr.Bart Brynestad February 15, 1997 SITE CONDITIONS We conducted our field investigation on January 22, 1997. The following sections summarize the results of our exploration. Surface The site is bounded to the east and southeast by Monster Road and a METRO sewer treatment facility. Warehouse facilities bound the site to the north. The Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way bounds the site to the southwest. An approximately 2-1/4 acre parcel owned by METRO extends northwest of Monster Road and bounds the southern part of the subject property. A 15-foot wide water easement and 60-foot wide railroad easement run along the eastern and western parts of the northern property line, respectively. • The site is situated on a hill surrounded by the Green River valley floor. Most of the eastern portion of the site (Parcel 3) is open with nearly flat to gently sloping ground extending to the east and north. These slopes steepen to a gradient of approximately 3:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) at the southern margin of Parcel 3 and lead off of the site toward the hill's peak on the adjacent METRO property. The northern margin of the site slopes downward toward the neighboring warehouse facility properties at an overall inclination of approximately 2:1. This slope continues westward into Parcel 4B where it turns southward and runs toward the Burlington Northern right-of-way at the site's southwestern margin. The slope's height ranges from approximately 40 feet at the northeastern corner of the site to 100 feet within Parcel 4B. In the vicinity of Test Pit TP-1, we observed a north-south trending, approximately 30-foot wide mine adit that formed an excavated trough extending down the face of the slope toward the northern property line. We also noted an approximately six foot square opening in the ground east of the adit that was partially obscured by berry brambles. The opening appeared to be a mine exploratory or ventilation shaft. The approximate locations of these features are shown on Figure 2. The presence of the shaft and potential for additional shafts in the area prevented a detailed examination of the slopes. The southern part of the site contains southwest-facing slopes standing at grades of up to 3:1. Relatively level areas are located adjacent to the top of a near-vertical 30 to 40-foot high cut made for construction of the adjacent railroad. The cutslope appeared to expose weathered sandstone and did not show any seeps, springs, or significant signs of instability. Portions of the cut were draped with chainlink fencing to provide protection against rockfall. Project No.T-3453 Page No. 2 Mr. Bart Brynestad February 15, 1997 A flat, marshy area is situated between the railroad spur and Burlington Northern line within the northwestern corner of the site. At the time of our visit, standing water covered most of this low-lying area. Minor standing water was also noted at the eastern part of the site. No signs of recent surface water runoff or erosion were noted during our visit. Vegetation at the site consisted of wild grasses and berry bramble within the open, eastern part of the site. Mature coniferous and deciduous trees, and occasional blackberry brambles covered the western sloped areas. Subsurface Test Pits TP-1 through TP-3, excavated at the southern portion of Parcel 3, showed topsoil/fill consisting of organic sandy and clayey silt to depths ranging from 1 to 2.5 feet below the ground surface. The organic layer was found overlying variably thick layers of sandy silt, clay, and silty clay that was stiff to hard. The silt and clay extended to depths ranging from four feet in Test Pit TP-2 to 8.5 feet in Test Pit TP-1. We noted a layer of coal positioned between the overlying clay and underlying highly weathered sandstone in Test Pit TP-1. Dense to very dense till-like soils consisting of silty very fine to fine sand with gravel, cobbles, and sandstone clasts were observed to the total depths of Test Pits TP-2 and TP-3. Test Pits TP-4 and TP-5 showed 1 to 1.5 feet of topsoil overlying medium dense to dense silty fine sand and sand with silt to depths of 11 feet and seven feet, respectively. These sandy soils represent sandstone that has completely weathered to a residual soil. The sand and silty sand were overlying soft, highly weathered, fractured sandstone and siltstone. Test Pits TP-4 and TP-5 were terminated within the highly weathered rock. We observed fill consisting of organic silt with clay to a depth of two feet within Test Pits TP-7 and TP- 8. In Test Pits TP-6 through TP-8, the fill and topsoil were underlain by variably thick layers of medium dense silty sand, stiff to very stiff clay, and medium dense silt. The silty sand contained gravel, sandstone clasts, and occasional boulders. Test Pits TP-6 and TP-7 were terminated within moderately to highly weathered siltstone and sandstone. We observed groundwater seepage of varying intensity during excavation of all of the tests pits except Test Pit TP-5. In most cases, the seepage was perched within a relatively permeable soil or weathered rock horizon overlying a relatively impermeable material. Detailed descriptions of the soils encountered during our investigation are presented on the Test Pit Logs, Figures 3 through 6. The locations of the test pits are shown on the Exploration Location Plan, Figure 2. Sieve analyses were conducted on three of the samples. The sieve results are presented as Figures 7 and 8. Plasticity characteristics were determined for two of the fine-grained soil samples. The results of the Atterberg limits tests are shown on the Test Pit Logs. Project No.T-3453 Page No. 3 Mr.Bart Brynestad February 15, 1997 The Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle, King County, Washington(D.R. Mullineaux 1965)shows rock units consisting of the Renton Formation(Tr)mapped at the northern portion of the site. Rocks of the middle and upper members of the Tukwila Formation (Tta and Ttu) are mapped at the southern part of the site. A fault is shown as the contact between the middle and upper members. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS Coal Mines We contacted Timothy Walsh of the Washington State Department of Natural Resources to obtain information regarding the coal mining history of the vicinity of the site. According to Mr. Walsh, a small coal mine (Diamond Mine) east of the site adjacent to the east side of Monster Road operated between 1927 and 1931, and produced about 6,300 tons of coal. A map of the Diamond Mine indicates the westernmost workings may extend under the eastern margin of the site. In 1984, a collapse over the workings occurred and was subsequently filled under supervision of the Office of Surface Mining. A review of Preliminary Geologic Map and Brief Description of Coal Fields of King County, Washington (1945), by W.C. Warren et al shows the location of the Diamond Mine and four "coal prospects"east of the site adjacent to Monster Road. A fifth prospect is mapped at the subject site in the approximate vicinity of the workings observed during our field investigation. Based on our literature review and field observations, we believe there is a high potential for the presence of abandoned coal mine workings beneath the site. Development at the site should consider the potential impacts to structures and roadways from the presence of underground workings. The hazard in this area involves the potential for surface subsidence to occur if an existing void or opening closes by natural processes. The potential for subsidence is dependent on many factors, including the dimensions of the mine workings and the strength and deformation characteristics of the overlying strata. We recommend conducting a detailed coal mine hazard evaluation at the site. Currently available field data suggest the effort should be concentrated within the northern portion of the site. The evaluation would involve drilling several test borings or using other appropriate exploration methods at the site in order to locate voids or evidence of collapsed voids. We would be pleased to work with you in developing a scope of work for a coal mine hazard study. Steep Slopes The site is primarily underlain by competent soils and weathered rock. In addition, there were no observed signs of large-scale slope instability at the site. Accordingly, we believe that with buildings and roadways setback suitable distances from slope edges, there will be minimal adverse impacts to the existing stability of these slopes. Project No.T-3453 Page No. 4 Mr. Bart Brynestad �^ February 15, 1997 Past grading associated with mining activity has occurred in sloping areas at the north-central margin of the site. Portions of the slope may be oversteepened by removal of overburden and underlying coal deposits. Moreover, depending on their size, location, and extent, the presence of mine workings in the area may present unique geotechnical problems relating to stability of the slopes. Once a coal mine hazard evaluation and topographic survey of the site is completed, slope stability analyses will be required to establish suitable structure locations and setbacks. Seismic In the Puget Sound area, most damage occurring during earthquakes is caused by ground shaking and ground failure. Damage is typically more severe in areas underlain by loose and saturated fine-grained sediments. Because the site is underlain by competent soils and rock, we expect the relative hazards to structures due to earthquake-induced ground motions to be small. In addition, the potential for liquefaction-related impacts to the structures is small, due to the absence of loose, saturated sand deposits at the site. The Puget Sound area falls within Seismic Zone 3 as classified by the Uniform Building Code (UBC). Based on the soil conditions encountered and the local geology, Table 16-J of the UBC indicates a site coefficient of 1.0 should be used in design of the buildings. DISCUSSION Based on our field investigation, we conclude that from a geotechnical standpoint, development of the site is probably feasible. The proposed office and warehouse buildings may be supported on conventional spread footing foundations bearing on competent native soils or on structural fills placed above competent soils. However, as discussed above, the potential for underground mine workings could significantly impact site development in terms of mitigation costs and building locations. A full detailed study to identify these conditions should be performed prior to proceeding with development design. We anticipate grading at the site would involve cuts located in the higher southern portions of the site and fill placement for building and parking areas occurring within the northern portion. Fill materials obtained from cut areas will consist of clays and glacial till containing 40 percent or more of silt and clay size particles. These materials will be extremely difficult to compact to a suitable unyielding state due to their sensitivity to the prevailing moisture conditions. You will also likely encounter weathered sandstone during grading at the site. Our sieve results indicate some of the highly weathered sandstone also contains silt and clay, which will present similar problems with regard to moisture sensitivity and compaction. Project No.T-3453 Page No.5 Mr. Bart Brynestad February 15, 1997 - You should be prepared to stabilize the clay soils with cement or lime in order to improve compactibility and provide increased strength to these materials. Alternatively, you may import pit-run material to the site for use as fill if suitable stabilization of the on-site soils or weathered rock cannot be achieved. Cut areas with exposed clay and till subgrades will require protection with a layer of crushed rock or lean mix during construction. In addition, you should plan on amending clay subgrades with cement or subcutting them 12 inches and restoring grade with a granular base for support of pavements. Based on our field observations, we do not expect unusual difficulty in excavating the weathered siltstone and sandstone. However, though the weathered sandstone was excavatable to depths reached with a backhoe, harder material would probably be found at greater depths. Cut and fill depths for the project may be limited in some areas by the presence of harder rock. The difficulty in excavating the harder rock may impose constraints on the placement of some utilities, if deep excavations are required to achieve desired utility line gradients. Groundwater seepage at the site indicates that temporary and permanent subsurface drainage measures may need to be implemented for the project. We appreciate the opportunity to provide geotechnical services to you on this project. We trust the information presented is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or need additional information,please call. Sincerely yours, TERRA ASSOCIATES,INC. ,►httiltI ) Toby Kevin P. Roberts, P.E. tJ • J. seProject Engineer Q >4•;A Theodore J. Schepper, 267•t2 Principal Engineer 0, a �4. KPRMS:tm IEXP1RE3 6/181 a7 l Encl: Figure 1 - i..iuity Map Figure 2 - Exploration Location Plan Figures 3 through 6 -Test Pit Logs Figures 7 and 8 - Grain Size Analyses Project No.T-3453 Page No. 6 r i i,iiE" 'y`, Jr \1`I 5 r S ST V f ,e��S '4;' s.aS l US uSi• I nisi'" ky• ! ":an, r_,,, 1�<3 _ �-'� `7� Nt.rn.r .9C 1 4 ` a. tw -I 4 _4 ill 4 M► .SS "' f _It ,r—— I� II s t sr<8 N'L it, -• \ -- f • t r i I2174 ;r Q •�� • IDS S / el v J, :ol lM .., Si �` tl L_s t.n.it D r 0,02A... e� I i+l s tar" :/ <' I 4 $ �4 "�—�i ii°} 't '�4, 4 19ryI < / . 'o 1 a•.� 128TH I ST ri 1281HaI. ' - I'^4- Il • r' r ^ST I \�i _I �ISl29T� IPL°` S 129rN Sr < R . _,i �- < A//1�\ a� I -- s. �!S l�pr{ ' Eh0 C e ]/fit V ip C 1 z - �7 1 �� 3 t 'I 9 sr a_�J 599 �� � \`�$ #1 h TO 1. aua,M, I 'IT >` i' ' ti J ' _N AIRI `I � b �, TSzon Sr�F''S uri6 ■ S 13240 r- sr i� Of -�` •\\\ 5133Ro j S7 ,�.__ yq r1Y`�`, ;. \\\o F kIN� is rN =j S -��+ s T rr :e:. `f, . 14 \\\� do, sT J IV m t1r7H31 I wi ST A' \ L�C.K j��, sr �I n aria \\� s I Y C R�L : -- I Y Sr • f d ' • WIN MID •�►, \\� - �iiilLST'1711,RD \\r- ' arr. ,,-1 A' L s,. 4C1.,'i�,r c" 1' 1{ nliarAril -.: Iwta,vr sr "i'z'sv--- Sig: r' ililirraiJa ,., , ,_,IT --- °,: • '1-... ‘N*.i0 < s umN• ,> > , SWmosi Le, : ,,, s isalx Sr s 11 :'��sr R .. A ?"•.. - \� Ji ®�: •t r•_ _,� ►c. 'Sns< �; 1S! TE +6�to1\ Sismi S0- ,' - ,I�?��� 5181 1�'11. , ft "= v'."LA I,`.i `.I.�Zi. t' i W� W 1 _1,Mk, f1 1� '�� \ 5A..1r z '.r'r I 54 19TH ST I.-0" ''r�n ,,�T UkWI ( tit - i 144 y '"r: �t,�/ (A' Pith r. �.; c<I • T s ��'4+ `) SOUTKF.r.ER ' arra+ssr Pi, I� I I/ I t"6 ._ \��1_ 95Ul7 F,p - %/ • BAKER al r \� r 1It11 I t -.�^1 SR 23RD Sr s" are-I'! J. y I -c1 - c . t,. If► J, i,wear t L-_=--.1_ I J :�v ~iC a a _ ^ STRANGER gLyo � '" t < a Ib.n,sr E r •a \ .\ R NTOI`I`-, 5. nTM S 167114 ST I�. SW77 E17ER' . + 1REcX 1ROV \ . - . .• 1 a •,u. OR sA ST Z6 NOTION 1 29TH n ; TS68 CORM. M. ; I 30 SI70^< - a �u�r rw Sit l sr i CORPOPAT 181 - 33R31 Di 3347 sr F ST / N � i I w 172No PL II / CORPORA I ..... a 5M 44TN ST _ =J sr I- !— �a�« °"3 T. I 6LVD ; o 8 i ST / a - to I vaRawr W � sr I f ♦ aurt +�' ST IST 7+1 — v wr Hi. — OF - # AI 3 ST ZII 111"41/ /-.- - I RI LLA 3 * 7�5y I Sit �` •1sI van,a / sp S. ' '4'i—O.- INE 1 ST c 1 r-a I _ r - 1l x VI 1_ -AO ■ T.Fs w1 REFERENCE: THE THOMAS GUIDE, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PAGES 655 AND 656, 1997 EDITION. VICINITY MAP isopell TERRA OAKSDALE BUSINESS PARK t\osiseroas ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No.3453 I Date 2/97 I Figure 1 Monster Road SW.(- _ APPROXIMATE SCALE —�_ 200 0 200 400 feet �� l - - - i5i SI 7 / TP-4 Si i TP-3 // FARCF.--.L._ I / . TP-5 TP-2 / i •--—-. L__1 PARCEL 3 /' /' TP-6 TP-I. 7 I 1 • .....--- MINE OPEN (.) __j__ — TP-8 51 TP-7/ • MINE SURFACE ADIT 7 LEGEND: o1 \� PARCEL 4-B �/ 5i APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATION I 1 / °�r co PARCEL L.-A I '/ ��9�� oA REFERENCE: o 1 PARCEL 2 �\ 1 '/ G0•tt'�a 1. SITE PLAN PREPARED BY BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC., JOB No. 89219.04, SHEET 1 OF 1, DATED \\ l �-7 vo�� 1/31/90, LAST REVISED 10/19/90. ' \ ,/' gdti� 2. SITE PLAN PREPARED BY BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, \ �� , oti�'�° INC., JOB No. 89219.06, SHEET 1 OF 1, DATED \ 4 a 4" 6/90, LAST REVISED 12/10/90. \\ /�/ cm° ,�yti .1 wee, - __ -- 41' EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN c(0o' ,f..=�',-: TERRA OAKSDALE BUSINESS PARK C,r'' ��.�`�• ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON "otechnicai Consultants Proj. No.3453 I Date 2/97 J Figure 2 r" Test Pit No. TP-1 Logged by: KPR Date: 1/22/97 Depth USCS/ W (ft ' Graph Soil Description (%) :. r ;,;;r TOPSOIL/FILL: Dark brown organic sandy SILT,very soft, moist. :rr 1�� ;;; , :r Yr jj Light gray-brown, mottled CLAY, fractured with original laminated - I CH structure, stiff(qu=1.5tsf), moist, medium plasticity. 37.1 5 i Light gray, mottled silty CLAY with siltstone and coal inclusions, L/ stiff(qu=1.5 tsf), fractured texture, moist, low plasticity. 35.5 Black COAL, fractured, moist,very soft. 1 10— /Gray very fine grained SANDSTONE,widely-spaced fractures, '\'_'1W' highly weathered, soft, moist. _ Test pit terminated at 12 feet. Light and moderate perched groundwater seepage observed at 2 feet and 10 feet, respectively. No caving. 15 Test Pit No. TP-2 Logged by: KPR Date: 1/22/97 Depth (ft.) USCS/ W Graph Soil Description (%) 0 0 1,1 OL . TOPSOIL/FILL: Dark brown organic silty sand with few gravel SM inclusions and occasional buried wood, loose, moist. 33.9 L Brown, mottled sandy SILT with clay, stiff(qu=2.0 tsf), moist, ML 28.1 low plasticity. 5 ri- .,: : Gray-brown silty very fine SAND with gravel, occasional cobbles, and clasts of highly weathered sandstone, very dense, moist. (Glacial Till) SM $: 10—1: 16.0 - Test pit terminated at 11 feet. - Very light perched groundwater seepage at 4 feet. - No caving. 15 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA OAKSDALE BUSINESS PARK RENTON, WASHINGTON ,•:• • • ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3453 Date 2/97 Figure 3 Test Pit No. TP-3 Logged by: KPR Date: 1/22/97 Depth USCS/ �ft'� Graph Soil Description 0 (%) TOPSOIL Dark brown organic clayey silt,very soft, saturated. � �// Gray, mottled silty CLAY, fractured, stiff(qu=1.0 tsf), moist, CL j / low to medium plasticity. 35.6 — Brown to blue-gray, mottled clayey SILT with occasional organic 5fibers, laminated,very stiff to hard(qu=3.0 tsf), moist, medium LL=59 MH plasticity. 45.6 pL=35 P1=24 Gray, mottled silty fine SAND with few gravel inclusions, occasional 10—'< SM cobbles and rare 24 inch boulders, dense,wet to saturated. (Till-like) 24.2 Test pit terminated at 12 feet. Ponded water at surface. Moderate groundwater seepage at 8 feet. No caving. 15 Test Pit No. TP-4 Logged by: KPR Date: 1/22/97 Depth (ft.) USCS/ W 0 Graph Soil Description (ado) PT TOPSOIL. l Red-brown(oxidized) silty fine SAND, medium dense, moist, 17.2 (completely weathered sandstone). Light gray to orange (oxidized layers) fine SAND with silt, dense, 5 moist becoming saturated at 8 feet(completely weathered 13.9 ; ,� sandstone). 0; SP-SM 10 Gray to orange (oxidized zones) highly weathered SILTSTONE, 19.1 soft,bedding structure, occasional fractures, moist. Test pit terminated at 13 feet. 15— Heavy perched groundwater seepage at 8 feet. No caving. TEST PIT LOGS TERRA OAKSDALE BUSINESS PARK ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3453 Date 2/97 Figure 4 Test Pit No. TP-5 Logged by: KPR Date: 1/22/97 Depth USCS/ W �ft'� Graph Soil Description o _AA 2PT IA e TOPSOIL: Dark brown organic sandy silt,wet. Tan to orange (oxidized) silty fine SAND with trace gravel, medium 23'2 dense to 4 feet becoming dense, moist to wet. (completely SMweathered sandstone). Brown to orange-brown(oxidized stains)SANDSTONE, highly weathered, bedding structure,thin coaly seams,very fine grained, soft, moist. 10- 19.8 Test pit terminated at 11 feet. No groundwater seepage or caving observed. 15 Test Pit No. TP-6 Logged by: KPR Date: 1/22/97 Depth (ft ) Graph Soil Description (o ) - 0 (O to 8 inches TOPSOIL) .... .......... . ............. Brown silty very fine to medium SAND with clasts of sandstone, 31.4 SM 4 foot boulder at 4 feet, disturbed texture, dense, moist '.' becoming saturated at 6 feet. 5 Yellow-tan fine-grained SANDSTONE, massive, highly weathered, 15.6 soft, moist. 10— Test pit terminated at 9.5 feet. Moderate perched groundwater seepage observed at 6 feet. No caving. 15 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA OAKSDALE BUSINESS PARK ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3453 Date 2/97 Figure 5 Test Pit No. TP-7 Logged by: KPR Date: 1/22/97 Depth USCS/ W eft'' Graph Soil Description o (/o) 'rrr ,::::r FILL: Dark brown organic silt with clay, soft, moist, low plasticity. MH Gray, mottled clayey SILT fractured,very stiff, (qu=2.25 tsf), LL=60 - moist, medium plasticity. 28.3 PL=41 5 P1=19 - Brown-gray,mottled sandy SILT,very fine sand, medium dense, - non-plastic,wet to saturated. 1 M L 26.9 10 Il.-_-.4.-__-_------7-_- Dark erav SILTSTONE.fractured, moderately weathered.soft.moist, Test pit terminated at 10.5 feet. Perched moderate groundwater seepage at 8 feet. No caving. 15 Test Pit No. TP-8 Logged by: KPR Date: 1/22/97 Depth (ft.) Graph Soil Description (%) _ OL.A;;;;' FILL: Dark brown organic silt with clay, soft, moist, low plasticity. r'.:.';;: 21.1 -I Gray, mottled CLAY, fractured, thin laminae, stiff(qu=2.0 tsf), CH moist, medium plasticity. CH 25.7 5 ! 1 Silty very fine to medium SAND with gravel,clasts of weathered — SM sandstone and occasional 2 foot boulders, dense, saturated becoming moist at 7 feet. 15.8 10 Test pit terminated at 10 feet. - Very light groundwater seepage and caving observed at 6 feet. 15 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA OAKSDALE BUSINESS PARK -'1 ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3453 Date 2/97 Figure 6 SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES 1 NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM \\ \\\\ \ N .p O2 O 0 0 O O O O S S S S S O_ 11./..../,-- _,., N 0 1 -1.. C.+ N N.. -. .A OD N OD .P ? O O O 1..., 0 O 0) -10. CA IV --•CO O) .1... CA N 90 ,- 10 0 M 80 - _ 20 o (1) m O i0 30 m o 0D c� 70 c7 — a D z _ --- _ -"- -- ----- --- -- - --_ — _ --1 60 40 c7 rn z D In 50 - - - A 50 m CO -< 40 _ 60 W 13 rn . (3• = 30 _ 70 ►D z --I ,— G� o = w 20 80 4> O cam4 D Z� X7 10 — --- — • --- D 90 o Orz _ N z rT1 o 1 it 1 1 I I I rill L 6 I 1 III I 11 I 1 I I I I I 100 fV ��� S S g O O O O O OOo rn P W N �Oo am P (.W N -'OOD {► W N �O O O O O • 8 UD >v_, rn GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS w N a =rZTI Z COARSE FINE COARSE 1 MEDIU 1 FINE z > COBBLES GRAVEL FINES �N� r� oz> Boring Depth c Key g orUSCS Description Moisture LL PL Test Pit (ft.) Content (%) v • TP-2 10.0 SM silty SAND with grovel O TP-4 2.0 SM silty SAND with some gravel SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM OON O) ? W N N p.r 4. N ? ? O O O O O •W N O co cr)8 S S S S 0 1111 90 ■■•��__11IMMIL MN EWE ���OMilormi -1iiiiia�- 10 Fbli 0 -.__■..■.E_ ._�=_.._. tI■■■ IIIII■■■■� m w rn 8° iiiiliiii'11E■ ■Mai■iiil ii■'�i■1111iiii■ 20 oa O 73 m ■■■■lulu■■■ B��■■ ■■■Ei iiiii�1111u■■■■ , c� C7 D n 70 30 o ai D Z -I 0 rn 60 0 ■■■■i■■ii■■ 111■■ Ii1111■■50 mum ■.m■.u�m ��■E ■■.�� M�.■.■■.��11111111__ 40 ■■■ I■II■■ ■ ■��� HUM 1111.■■■i 50 m CO 40 60 op 111111111111 _■ ■a_ .■■■_ .111■■■■ 70g --r ■ _ .�■ ma ■ � ■.■ .�■ nu a� 2o p plow immuilli imilimi 8° -I CA 20 VI nlarillirlailairlill _ Z u D 0 ■i■■ii■um■■� ■E ii■■■_1111u■■■M 90 o> z ■■■■■i■■i■■■■ �■■■■M■■■�11111■■■■ Z I P 0 I 1 1 1 1 11s 1 I II II I L I I II I I I I I ILI I 100 N CON S ig S O ) O O O O 01 - A N -' b0 b1 'A W IJ O O O C C b O O 0 0 O v m GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS `� N co c. w N S D =in z COARSE FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE 2-VI> COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES -< zw_ D Boring or Depth Moisture Key Test Pit (ft.) USCS Description Content (�) LL PL • TP-6 3.0 SM silty SAND 11- I(404 ) PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT FOR UPPER MONSTER ROAD City of Renton, Washington 1 OCTOBER 1997 1 1 • Prepared For: Opus Northwest LLC 200 - 112`h Avenue NE, Suite 205 Bellevue, WA 98004 1 Prepared By: David W. Spiller, P.E., Project Engineer Reviewed By: Allan E. Bessette, P.E., S.E., Principal 97293.10 RECEIVED out 3 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF R!NTON C I V I L a S T R U C T U R A L ENGINEERSAPLANNERS r A PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT FOR UPPER MONSTER ROAD City of Renton, Washington OCTOBER 1997 Prepared For: Opus Northwest LLC 200 - 112t'Avenue NE, Suite 205 Bellevue, WA 98004 • Prepared By: David W. Spiller, P.E., Project Engineer Reviewed By: Allan E. Bessette, P.E., S.E., Principal 97293.10 sr a 4/ - pA`. :..f. M V::4 rv�1 PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT FOR UPPER MONSTER ROAD City of Renton, Washington le, October 1997 Prepared for: Opus Northwest LLC 200 - 112th Avenue NE, Suite 205 Bellevue, WA 98004 Prepared by: David W. Spiller, P.E., Project Engineer Reviewed by: Allan E. Bessette, P.E., S.E., Principal 97293.10 This analysis is based on data and records either supplied to, or obtained by, AHBL. These documents are referenced within the text of the analysis. The analysis has been prepared utilizing procedures and practices within the standard accepted practices of the industry. AHBL, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1. Project Overview 1 2. Preliminary Conditions Summary 2 3. Off-Site Analysis 2 4. Retention / Detention Analysis 3 5. Conveyance Systems Analysis 3 6. Special Reports and Studies 4 7. VII CONCLUSION 4 Appendix A Figures Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Preliminary Site Plan Appendix B Preliminary Drainage Calculations Appendix C Agreement and Calculations for the Regional Detention Facility 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW Opus Northwest is proposing to develop parcel 3 (tax parcel number 24234- 9121). The parcel is located near the southwest intersection of Monster Road and South 143rd Street in the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 13, Township 23 North, Range 4 E, Willamette Meridian (see Figure 1 - Appendix A). The parcel consists of 7.12 acres of second-growth forest and generally slopes to the north with slope varying from 2 percent to 50 percent. The highest elevation on the parcel is located along the south property line with an elevation of 108 feet. The lowest elevation is located along the north property line with an elevation of 50 feet. The Opus Northwest plan is to construct a 110,906-square-foot office (106,106- square-foot building footprint) and warehouse facility on the parcel. The facility will include approximately 131,278 square feet of drivable impervious area with a total of 88 parking spaces. The construction will include grading a level building pad with retaining walls. Access to the site will be at two locations off of Monster Road. Stormwater runoff currently generated by the site flow into the recently constructed Plumbers and Pipefitters Trust regional detention facility located northwest of the parcel. The facility was constructed to provide stormwater detention for the Metro parcel and parcels created by the Blume Large Lot Subdivision. The regional detention facility is covered by agreements and easements on file at the County Recorder's Office (see Appendix B). The post-development drainage will be collected by an on-site storm sewer. The runoff generated by the impervious drivable surface will be conveyed to a structure where the 2-year peak flow will be directed to a biofiltration swale for treatment. All flows greater than the 2-year peak flow and stormwater runoff collected by the roof downspouts will be conveyed to the regional detention facility without treatment. The City of Renton Standards (King County Surface , HBL 1 greater than the 2-year peak flow and flow not generated by or crossing impervious drivable surfaces. No detention or retention will be provided as part of the development of this site. All detention or retention requirements are met by the regional facility which included this site in the sizing of the facility. The calculations and areas used to size the facility will be discussed in Section 4. Detention Analysis and Design. 2. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY Opus Northwest is currently seeking SEPA approval for the proposed development. As part of the SEPA process, several required permits or conditions may be placed on the development of the site. These issues will be discussed in the final drainage report for the project. The soils on-site consist of beausite gravelly sandy loam based on the Soils Conservation Service's King County soils map. These soils are hydrologic group type C soil. Additional soils information is provided in the soils report prepared for the site by Terra Associates and included in the submittal for the project. 3. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS The site currently receives off-site runoff from a small tributary area located south of the site, approximately 1.25 acres of second growth forest. The runoff generated by this tributary area currently sheet flows across the site and eventually to the regional detention facility. Under the proposed conditions, the off-site flow will be collected by the on-site storm sewer and conveyed to the stormwater treatment biofiltration swale. The proposed drainage system for the site will collect the tributary and on-site runoff and discharge the flow to the regional facility. Stormwater treatment will be provided for the diving surfaces as discussed earlier. The sizing and AHBL 2 discharge form the regional facility is discussed in Section 4. Retention / Detention Analysis. 4. RETENTION / DETENTION ANALYSIS As discussed in previous sections, all runoff generated by this site will be conveyed to the regional detention facility located northwest of the site. The facility is covered by an agreement on file at the County Recorder's office (see Appendix B). The regional detention facility was sized based on a total impervious area of 25.5 acres of which parcel 3 would contribute 5.70 acres of impervious area. The proposed development will create a total of 5.48 acres of impervious area. Since the proposed impervious area is 0.22 acres less than the detention facility was designed, therefore, no detention or retention facilities are planned or required by ordinance as part of this development. All the required detention or retention required is provided by the regional facility. 5. CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS The conveyance system will be designed to meet the requirements of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. We are currently proposing separate conveyance systems for the parking lot and roof areas. The conveyance system for the parking lot will direct runoff to a structure that will divert the 2-year, 24-hour peak flow rate to a biofiltration swale for stormwater treatment. Preliminary calculations estimate the 2-year, 24-hour peak flow to be 1.0 cubic feet per second. To treat the estimated flow, the biofiltration swale, assuming a flow depth of 3 inches will need to be 10 feet wide at the bottom with 3:1 side slopes. The preliminary site plan shows the proposed location for the biofiltration swale (see Figure 3; Appendix A). Runoff generated by the roof and landscape areas does not require stormwater treatment prior to release. Therefore, the conveyance system for the roof will bypass the biofiltration swale. AHBL 3 6. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES A soils report has been prepared for the site and is included in Appendix B. Additional studies may be deemed necessary by the SEPA process. If any are • required, they will be included in the final Technical Information Report. 7. CONCLUSION Opus Northwest development plan for parcel 3 of the Blume Large Lot Subdivision includes construction of a 111,270-square-foot warehouse and office building with 127,600 square feet of drivable impervious area. Stormwater runoff generated by the driving surfaces will be collected and conveyed by an on-site storm sewer. Flows less than or equal to the 2-year, 24-hour event will be diverted to a biofiltration swale for treatment. Stormwater runoff generated by the roof does not require stormwater treatment and will be conveyed in a separate storm sewer system, which bypasses the biofiltration swale. Stormwater detention will be provided by the Plumbers and Pipefitters Trust's regional detention facility. The regional facility was designed to detain stormwater from this site and other adjacent parcels. Therefore, the preliminary development plans satisfy or exceed the City of Renton requirements for storm drainage. AHBL, Inc. David W. Spiller, P.E. Project Engineer DWS/wsn 9729310.rep October 1997 • AUBL 4 APPENDIX A Figure 1 - Vicinity Map Figure 2 - Preliminary Site Plan �,�HBL , ..... _ 1111E,011111115M1—!-1-'7;11:e :,-. -. ....; c -- 211..„1•1 : *---- . 1- vet s,v6, 4‘. ., s" ". 12440 s r 1 ' 1 .... -.4 • ,.., ,',4•S,•I':'. cs '5 r'S Ltd ''k - F, • ,, 5 ,..7 s , .,- 4 ;.I, y • "s -fea -,,,-.11i- . .. ......- ,26 ,e 1. t , .1 . _,,,. :,.. _ . st, .. 111_ Iiii -24 • . ,,,,, r I-111, „ ._. 3. . _ ..... •• - . i 71.;. "or-,S4,.rn..c.A°s l s;94 ,1,.1287 , ii ,. LThl,..s7. iir,,,,, :._ c .. ... . s ...; V woo-„,— ;,, ,„ , ., 11 IR . •'• 4; e4.), Z - . Li . 4, ... ', `.4)11\\ _ t.„,,, ...,1 4 s 2 = s rr., ' • 19 4-s^ = ,.0. • 1 41tX133. sr /4.-AA. q. --9• - -, '.z.is. ....7x.....r,•;,,.111.....,111111C NTA .IP /*cm • 1i f A Pzfili.,i5j1 PI gm AIM . iiiir..... st• . 5 131111141b AN Trwa - • °It, Ada • '' . 1 ..,,,:t!..*••it.,...5t:;.• % e •r -B.,444 _,,;•:*.r... /4'.; 1 T4r. .b'34r/iii 1 ' ' day ; , 4 pogo...Ai s"I.. .1. . ' 117" --.'-' \I '. 9 LA K 4,,... rs,3..as . . ...: v .4.•, I0q, 13 2NO 0.7rtein •1......„..,.,,,,.... _ s N I 4'Y sr 9C° S ' . . .-4elderfr, ..:. „., . -2i 416.: I 4itkite7 Ail 15171&;5011.S•3 RD 1. k4.... 1-:',-"1'.. AA\ t V-Ec:Rilar: a ."7.:?... .77:" S: \‘?-‘\`: 7 ° •• ''.- • .:1_ •• - ocifteor, ;,.-i-Tififi r I , s . - ,. . *"..,•-.....;., •ji. •:7- 7•:::-..1 tl„.... •.-------.. „mar ET.,, tfer i , i.. .4.i,t'a'-:',. .:•,;;-='.* .":,-..!.------ - :. 2, ,sir ": Fir,,,, v° ,F:efr .,.....,,,Ilk .7".• .1 6 711..--1 1 A,:. ....:::.. 1- zi ., .- •, 11! "1 * , /,..E.. -•- -- . ..„7-1-.., -0 7'• 1 . i'41,,1 LIIII..,glirn'A.• L ..:::-./' 1110.0 1 /44 • sr...-.114.711, . 1,,,,,i....im.1.-.:s.kr.,-..1:-..-;- , . .- -...ari....;-., • .. i o ... . . ,..i,17 . Lta••y•-• k i:•:'.....z.--.: ',N -4...---.----.4-ig.-_ iii I ...,... - Al ..1„.,...:i:.& . _ . s 1 :::1;:,1-4r.;...,*--sN , - r ,.. , 1 sr d'0,4e-,i,.....: ,s 7"-:. '•^ T.'A elk. •--, -.'".---7.4- 1 I - • ,IS4 lif id" 3 14MI• ii.- 4.:* .-- ''''-'1 . -.,?:\•,., R. "- N1-01\1::- 1 sr Glow _.•:}.:•gir .. . . , .---'. .-\\ .r ,- •.- ..,.3... • '.'204 " - . , • ... a s • 2 . 4A. - L . .,•:• .;`.'. A .,-••••'. •_. 'tii!-•,•:...'I• !ILI.. .7.4•4‘ . „.40,00 --------.-.--- . ...- • 5443 .ST S I T E _./,.; L-.* \ ..• ' .\ S 50 1 e- /1 gif.6*- 41214111rnialitkiiRMIE: . Allft..... ; . • 111L1=31,::::"•A 711kk ..-.....-----iire _..._._\\iri.. ....--- .„,,,,,41.1wv,...,....... li, ....,--. ., f a ---1., .--• .i,1 ; 1 r "'"... \ - f -- .. -:-•.: Ittil . 9' ' •- '!' tollti, .._ )10,o 44 ?M'ff t\ t II 3, 4:P'.1 )13 ! - .... ' alussr - ....:,7 • • 4,..., 1 . 1.•:? 1 . .- ... ,. vi. - . iiiiia ONG 11,Ja '•-•-.77.„\-- ;ST wi . • • SW Z:01:1 ST S'' ....• ' 3" . .2..: ... . _.- I 4 _ < . . . c . i'' Pl'' SrPAPOER • KM ' " '41.4S.I R NTON l •C >. -1 § 1113 I I. •CC, ... '''''. :1\1 „ . 2: W -3..136131___._ i 3 • ...-..1'" , NCTIO i , ism 3an4 i MR ST . I .. i ._• ... sal =arm• TREcx [moo 91/TM:22r r'•4111' • , . . . 30 .... .1 _ - - 26 25.. 0" ,...w•.. ca id t R r, il ...• :0 , • :.CCRPOPAT /111 • 1 ,..i . • CR 4 - Ur 1 • `" /V '''.1 1 SY T4 ST . III am',,-,.., , a . I1 2x a • 1 . • . 14 . • ,4- 'ringer' . . 1 ) if- • -.: -I .' , , 7, ' PAMIiIr ....i. .. .. . 1 1 . - .' /. , .1:.1...::7_ t SL1 34.111 sr ., ' 1110L140 .• : : .4 * ....2._ • . • + ( - ij 4_ H/ - -0 .... '• 1,a' ,. !SAX!. 04 ; pRILLA sat g' gsr ,• 4 . . f 1. T.S6-`16.- ' f 5:' . - A• . «-. 4 .44. HEN IL, V!co in/ m ti-p CIVIL d sraucrURAL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS•LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS I 33,3,D31,3 3:1., 3orE 300• TACOnA3 rya 38303 ;:./3 333 2.22 • F3., 12081 332.33'2 I SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 N. , RANGE 4 E. W.M. <=0 c.W ; RENTON, WASHINGTON D_il E 510.T15 8S f / - - - -- bust iY - /-CCNECT TO - - - - - -- 1 ('fl V<pg SET STARLESS DI ; _ - ,,, NBE350rE /I EXMN,1`. '43535 - i n. J ey STEEL NAL T / All tA.T.T•tS"°15 ra.IZ' = En= — ;, I N JZ..fi_ . ir - t ENN'a'.TOP CTR229s R 365.3T rye ,�9a/ R - - - - - . s s - - - o-.-� _ _ ' ?ErN"C'aoJ.� CITY OF aeNTDN e T.871.06, a: Myo. :LT Iz' co arE T ro • VW. �l 1A E �Pj� I Ialsr�r. /- Es SET iAIX/LD - 105. • ./ ��;'i,, • , "- •- .- _-,ram f 0%1 \•GONG SIDE WALL \\ - OM,.TOP C11 73.3T O . . ��. d! - - J MY OF RENTON �' AT/ RETAINING MINI y^ \, - - '� BYPASS TD \) '� : _ DETFHSI�N MO - ._ - - PONE eRx E RAnoN' 3 j(J//J SOLE �. .- - FY.72A \ / =1L09ES I7 11._ F9r \� }) r - COW 3DE EAU( - - _ I i ewe 3 :3-ea o't' +, _ �o, - - .RISER RDaa w; °-2O OOO• fi ,- f ..�.IX,,\ A° . , O / eacrJLaw tif R-256.48' ELK 22' .( \444.\\ N> ``�\\ - �,....-•�� `� - - ,RFNCH^:AIN - 89.53' -, il Stu* \ - 4TAfP PAYi - REfAMy �; �.c /. o �iI �_ o J -- \ ;a . - FA ".: la 3 i;; \ \ .. if �� . i, .. r ; . z a • 41-4// , CL \ . LEGEND � 8 s NEr . FMSN Roar Y . iDC = FEE WARMISHCONECPON ( d ° FN • FIRE MOUNT D . STORE DRAIN \ S . SANITARY SHIER - Alk. O en.s Aee W • WATER fr / 1I Oran.w Ate C8 N. CATCH BASIN !/� ea* . u OCT aT '• Job Ne. ` / anaa+o \ GRAPHIC SCALE d« . _ / Biwa No. MO NI = MIME MENNOMMOMMI C1 (III PUT) or Slum. I bob.a A. w APPENDIX B Preliminary Drainage Calculations AHBL 10/27/97 Adams, Hodsdon, Bessette & Lindsay Inc. page 1 Upper Monster Road Opus Northwest 2-Year 24-hour Event BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: DRIVE - NAME: DRIVE-ABLE SURFACE AND LANDSCA SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 3 . 40 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 1. 95 inches AREA. . : 0 . 39 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 81. 00 TIME OF CONC • 22 . 85 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 3 . 01 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 40 . 00 ns: 0 . 8000 p2yr: 1. 95 s: 0 . 0400 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns: 0 . 0110 p2yr: 1 . 95 s: 0 . 0100 TcReach - Channel L: 600. 00 kc: 42 . 00 s: 0 . 0050 PEAK RATE: 1 . 00 cfs VOL: 0 . 45 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: OFF NAME: OFF-SITE BASIN SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1. 25 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 1 . 95 inches AREA. . : 1. 25 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 81. 00 TIME OF CONC • 44 . 77 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0. 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 130 . 00 ns: 0 . 8000 p2yr: 1. 95 s: 0 . 0400 PEAK RATE: 0. 06 cfs VOL: 0 . 06 Ac-ft TIME: 540 min BASIN ID: ROOF NAME: building roof SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 43 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 1. 95 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 81. 00 TIME OF CONC • 30 . 00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 2 . 43 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 1430 . 00 ns: 0 . 0110 p2yr: 1. 95 s: 0 . 0050 TcReach - Channel L: 700 . 00 kc: 42 . 00 s: 0 . 0050 TcReach - Channel L: 600 . 00 kc: 42 . 00 s: 0 . 0050 PEAK RATE: 0. 72 cfs VOL: 0 . 35 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min Size Biofiltration Swale Flow 1.00 cfs slope (s) 2.00% (bottom slope for for biofiltration design) depth (y) 0.33 ft. Mannings n 0.35 KK Sides (z) 3 (3 to 1 side slope preferred) Actual Length 200 ft. (desired length is 200 ft.) Required bottom width (b) calculation Q = (1.49/ n) x A x R2I3x.J (mannings equation) A = (b + zy)y / R = A/ (b + 2y,/1+ z2) "b" is solved for using a computer spreadsheet function to obtain a trail and error solution of b = 10.15 feet, for a desired length of 200 feet. check Q = 1.001 cfs, OK same as given Velocity = 0.272 fps <1.5 OK Filename King Tab BIOSIP:41 F/0/24/97 1 16 NI APPENDIX C Agreement And Calculations For The Regional Detention Facility AHBL RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF AND AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: GARTH A. SCHLEMLEIN, Esq. FLOYD & SCHLEMLEIN, P. S. 2505 Third Avenue, Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98121 REGIONAL DETENTION FACILITY PUMP STATION AGREEMENT AND RECIPROCAL EASEMENTS This Regional Detention Facility Pump Station Agreement and Reciprocal Easements ("Agreement") is made as of this day of , 1995 by and among the Seattle Area Plumbing and Pipefitting Apprentice and Journeyman Training Trust ("Trust") , Eland Building Limited Partnership ("Eland") , Jefferson Smurfit Corporation ("JSC") , B & G Partnership ("B&G") , and King County Department of Metropolitan Services ("Metro") . RECITALS A. Eland, JSC, Trust, B&G, and Metro own parcels of real property located adjacent to or near each other in King County, Washington, described respectively in Exhibit A (the "Eland Property") , Exhibit B (the "JSC Property") , Exhibit C (the "Trust Property") , Exhibit D (the "B&G Property") , Exhibit E (the "Metro Property") (all of the foregoing are collectively referred to herein as the "Properties") . B. Surface water runoff from the Properties drains into portions of the Trust Property and the Eland Property, including a detention pond located on the Trust Property (hereinafter referred to as the "Detention Pond") . C. As a result of the volume of surface water runoff from the Properties during certain storm events, water col- lected in the Detention Pond overflows onto portions of the Eland Property and the Trust Property. D. In order to allow for future development, and to pre- vent further overflow, it is necessary to design, con- struct, and maintain a Regional Detention Facility and Pump Station, together with all appurtenances, pipes and easements (the "System") , which will evacuate water from the Detention Pond when it reaches a ,certain level. The parties hereto desire to jointly fund the design, construction and maintenance of the System in accordance with the 173640.4 5/17/95 10:15+® -1- parameters set forth by the City of Renton and the terms of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed: CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SYSTEM 1. Trust Supervision. The Trust shall perform the following duties: (a) The Trust shall supervise, manage and pay all costs and expenses (subject to the right to reimbursement as provided in Section 2 (a) below) in connection with the design and construction of the System. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Trust shall cause all permits and easements necessary for the System to be obtained, shall cause the prepara- tion of all construction documents and plans , shall cause the competitive bidding of all major portions of the work, and shall cause the System to be constructed and completed in a good and workmanlike manner in accordance with all applicable governmental requirements. The design and construction of the System shall be in substantial accordance with the Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. proposal dated December 22, 1994 . The estimated budget for the design and construction of the System is set forth in Exhibit F hereto. (b) After completion of construction of the System, the Trust shall cause the System to remain in good operating condition and shall cause all maintenance, repair and necessary reconstruction of the System from time to time to be accom- plished. The Trust shall pay all such costs and expenses (sub- ject to the right to reimbursement as provided in Section 2 (b) below) . (c) The Trust shall maintain all accounts, con- struction records and operating data and allow access to all parties upon reasonable notice. (d) The Trust shall distribute invoices to the parties for the payments required under Section 2 below not less than twenty (20) days prior to the respective payment date. The invoices will be accompanied with copies of invoices from con- tractors, suppliers and other vendors substantiating the request for payment. (e) The Trust shall perform its duties and obligations herein in good faith with reasonable diligence and care. The Trust shall be paid no compensation or fee for any of its ser- vices hereunder. It is understood that the Trust may contract with consultants and contractors in connection with the per- formance of its duties hereunder. 173640.4 5/17/95 10:15am -2- 2 . Payments by Parties. (a) With respect to the costs and expenses of design, construction, permitting, obtaining necessary easements and all portions of the work in constructing the System as generally described in Section 1 (a) , the parties shall reimburse the Trust for such aggregate costs and expenses as follows: B&G: Balance of aggregate costs and expenses JSC: 5% of aggregate costs and expenses Metro: 5% of aggregate costs and expenses Eland: $25, 000 lump sum payment Trust: 30% of aggregate costs and expenses Eland shall pay $5, 000 upon the execution of this agreement and the balance upon completion of the System. The Trust shall invoice the other parties on a monthly basis upon accrual of expenses. All invoices shall be due within thirty (30) days of receipt. Overdue payments shall bear interest at twelve percent (12%) per annum from the due date. (b) With respect to the costs and expenses of operat- ing, repairing and any necessary reconstruction of the System after completion thereof as generally described in Section 1(b) , the parties shall reimburse the Trust as follows: B&G: 35% of aggregate costs and expenses JSC: 5% of aggregate costs and expenses Eland: 30% of aggregate costs and expenses Trust: 30% of aggregate costs and expenses Metro shall have no obligation for the costs and expenses of operating, maintaining, repairing and any necessary recon- struction of the System. The Trust shall invoice the other parties not more often than twice per calendar year for these costs and expenses and all invoices shall be due within thirty (30) days of receipt. Overdue payments will bear interest at twelve percent (12%) per annum. 3 . Reciprocal Easements. In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, for other good and valuable considera- tion, receipt is which is hereby acknowledged, Eland and the Trust hereby grant and convey to each other and to the other parties hereto, a nonexclusive, perpetual easement along, in, upon and under the Trust Property and the Eland Property in the locations as legally described on the attached Exhibits G and Exhibit H, respectively, and as depicted on the sketch attached hereto as Exhibit I (the "Easement Areas") , for the purpose of installing, constructing, operating, maintaining, repairing and replacing the System, together with nonexclusive rights of ingress and egress to and from the Easement Areas for said pur- - poses. Eland and the Trust may use the surface of the Easement Areas granted herein for any purpose which is not inconsistent 173640.4 5/17/95 io-.is m -3- with installing, constructing, operating, maintaining, repairing and replacing the System. 4 . Insurance. The Trust shall require all parties per- forming the work on the System to provide a Certificate of Insurance naming the parties hereto as additional insureds. The level and scope of insurance shall be set at commercially reason- able limits depending upon the type and scope of services or goods provided. 5 . Operator. Except as otherwise provided in para- . graph 6 (c) , the Trust shall be designated the Operator and Permittee of the System. 6 . General Provisions. (a) Binding Effect. The covenants contained in this Agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. (b) Enforcement. In the event of a breach of any of the covenants or agreements set forth in this Agreement, the parties hereto shall be entitled to any and all remedies avail- ' able at law or in equity, including but not limited to the equit- able remedies of specific performance or mandatory or prohibitory injunction issued by a court of appropriate jurisdiction. The parties hereto agree that in the event it becomes necessary for any party to defend or institute legal proceedings as a result of the failure of either party to comply with the terms, covenants , agreements and/or conditions of this Agreement, it is understood and agreed that the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to be reimbursed for all costs incurred or expended in connection therewith, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees (including appellate fees) and court costs. If any of the parties fails to make the payments to the Trust set forth in Section 2 within thirty (30) days after the due date, the Trust shall have the right impose a lien upon the real property of such defaulting party which shall become effective upon recording a notice in the recording records of King County, Washington, stating the amount due and the legal ,.. description of the defaulting party's property. Such lien may be enforced and foreclosed by the Trust by an action in like manner as a mortgage of real property. (c) Amendment. This Agreement may not be modified, amended or terminated without the prior written approval of the parties hereto. Provided, however, if the Trust or its successor or assign ceases to exist or otherwise fails after written notice from any party for a period of ninety (90) days to perform the duties set forth in Section 1, the parties other than the Trust by a vote of such parties obligated to make not less than fifty percent (50%) of the reimbursement payments set forth in 173640 4 5/17/95 10:15am -4- Section 2 (b) may elect another person or party to perform the duties set forth in Section 1. In connection with such replacement, the approving parties may amend or modify this ,.. Agreement as may be reasonably necessary to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement. (d) Waiver. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party against whom it is asserted, and any such written waiver shall only be applicable to the specific instance to which it relates and shall not be deemed to be a continuing or future waiver. (e) Captions. The captions and paragraph headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience and reference only and in no way define, describe, extend or limit the scope or intent of this Agreement, nor the intent of any provision hereof. (f) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, and each counterpart hereof shall be deemed to be an original instrument, but such counterparts together shall constitute but one Agreement. DATED as of the day and year first above written. TRUST: SEATTLE AREA PLUMPING & PIPEFITTING APPRENTICE AND JOURNEYMEN TRAINING TRUST / ij /lam /.7 By ,• / /-/I/ ' ELAND: ELAND =UILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By : M+nster R ad Building Corp. , By `s•g ne 1 p ry er I • s JSC: JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION By Its B&G: B & G PARTNERSHIP By Its 173610.3 3/28195 10-.35am -5- .AN • Section 2 (b) may elect another person or party to perform the duties set forth in Section 1. In connection with such replacement, the approving parties may amend or modify this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement. (d) Waiver. No waiver of any of the provisions of • this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party against whom it is asserted, and any such written waiver shall only be applicable to the specific instance to which it relates and shall not be deemed to be a continuing or future waiver. (e) Captions. The captions and paragraph headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience and reference only and in no way define, describe, extend or limit the scope or intent of this Agreement, nor the intent of any provision hereof. (f) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, and each counterpart hereof shall be deemed to be an original instrument, but such counterparts together shall constitute but one Agreement. DATED as of the day and year first above written. TRUST: SEATTLE AREA PLUMPING & PIPEFITTING APPRENTICE AND JOURNEYMEN TRAINING TRUST By Its ELAND: ELAND BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By Its V JSC: JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION By cy. 1 / .. Its • B&G: B & G PARTNERSHIP By Its 173640.3 3/28/95 10:35.m -5- w Section 2 (b) may elect another person or party to perform the duties set forth in Section 1. In connection with such replacement, the approving parties may amend or modify this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement. (d) Waiver. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party against whom it is asserted, and any such written waiver shall only be applicable to the specific instance to which it relates and shall not be deemed to be a continuing or future waiver. (e) Captions. The captions and paragraph headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience and reference only and in no way define, describe, extend or limit the scope or intent of this Agreement, nor the intent of any provision hereof. (f) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, and each counterpart hereof shall be deemed to be an original instrument, but such counterparts together shall constitute but one Agreement. DATED as of the day and year first above written. TRUST: SEATTLE AREA PLUMPING & PIPEFITTING APPRENTICE AND JOURNEYMEN TRAINING TRUST By Its ELAND: ELAND BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By Its JSC: JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION By Its B&G: B & G NERSHIP Its 1736-10.3 3/28/95 10:35am -5- • METRO: KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF METROPOLITAN SERVICES By ` Its a4 r• 4a-, pp«' 173640.4 5/17/95 10:15am —6— STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF � ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Seo,. S e- is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument, on oath stated that said person was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the C�aN`e. of SEATTLE AREA PLUMBING AND PIPEFITTING APPRENTICE AND JOURNEYMEN TRAINING TRUST, a trust, to be the free and voluntary act of such trust for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. v.. Dated this IS day of , 1995. (Signuws of Notary) S c.,k (Legibly Print or Stamp Name of Notary) Notary public in and for the state of Washington, residing at � '3 -- My appointment expires STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF K i ,J ct ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that $ , 4), r/4,,,J 4 is the person who appeared before me, and said person ' Jacknowledged that said person signed this instrument, on oath stated that said person was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the L;,t.,;t<✓ ,rf&e/t of ELAND BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a partnership, to be the free and voluntary act of such partnership for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (� Dated this Cj ±K day of / I l2 I L , 1995 . (Signature of Notary) L ' i Lk) )-1 C 2at ow.. • (Lcgbty Print or Stamp Nof Notary) Notary public in and for the state of Washington, residing at 5E47GF My appointment expires /212 + / 55 173640.3 3/28/95 10:35am -7- r STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF K. c, I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that F2.1.nn,r2EF is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument, on oath stated that said person was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION, a corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such corporation for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this 't- day of , 1995. 0,10 -t• A1CI1 -\EL V ),“ aOtAgy 9; (Legbty Prat or Swap Namc.a Notary) z" Nvtary public in and for the state u'► °?OtL c Washington, residing at 3 • • 17), ;aye 1.�.�� ., °PWAS��G•..My appointment expires - ► - ` \' ) °°��rrafal��taa STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument, on oath stated that said person was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of B & G PARTNERSHIP, a partnership, to be the free and voluntary act of such partnership for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this day of , 1995 . (Sigtuturc of Notary) (1<gbty Prmt or Sump Name of Notary) Notary public in and for the state of Washington, residing at My appointment expires 1 730.3 3/28/95 10:35am -8- k STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) s s. COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument, on oath stated that said person was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION, a corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such corporation for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this day of , 1995. (Signature of Notary) (Legibly Print or Stamp Name of Notary) Notary public in and for the state of Washington, residing at My appointment expires STATE OF WASHINGTON ) I .09 ) ss. COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 3"U Ge M- P I v,► .ie is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument, on oath stated that said person was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the ger,, ?c4v4tlev of B & G PARTNERSHIP, a partnership, to be the free and voluntary act of such partnership for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this j vd day of M 0 111 , 1995. (Signuure of Notary) ♦ i w" • �Q`�T,^{o qy4 cys Ito Ai de vs6 vi / (Legibly Print of Stamp Name of Notary) Notary public in and for the state r of Washington, residing at Sc-, 1-1--f-1• ".. �i Q rrbr llll �••,R. ,.w��� s* My appointment expires -1-I - c (Q l73(.:U 3 3/2 I9S 10:35am -8- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF nIA17 ) I cert• f that I know or have satisfactory evidence that j/� � , � is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument, on oath stated that said person was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the 1140,4Syr. of the KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF METROPOLITAN SERVICES, a municipal corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such municipal corporation for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this d2 ----- day of C li , 1995. r • 1 L A. BUS/';, (Stgnat�or Notary) „W • `` M�AJJJ/F A . r LE E. • • NOTARY �t9 U (Legibly Print or Stamp Name of Notary) —*— PUBLIC 2 z Notary public in and for the state ' of Washington, residing at S.5/4-rLE WASN, My appointment expires T)f,?E . 1995 • 173640.4 5/17/95 10:15am -9 TO REGIONAL TENTION FACIL1T PUMP STATION AGREEMENT AP RECIPROCAL EASEMENTS PARCEL 2: Legal Description of the Eland Property ' THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 6, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 4- EAST, W.M. , ALL IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: • COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24, IN SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER 1,214.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 3, CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST AND NOW KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 32°29'51" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 85. 34 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET, AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 139.14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°24 '51" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 268.00 ' FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02°33' 12" WEST 115.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34" WEST 95.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°37'17" WEST 105.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°22'40" WEST 437.90 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF .. BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88°03'09" WEST 283.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54°28'10" WEST 490.45 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL • AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE NORTH 28°11'33" WEST ALONG • SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 115.75 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 411.73 FEET AND ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 57.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH • 20°11 '33" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 156.01 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 523.68 FEET AND ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 419.12 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 667.96 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 6°57' 18" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 102.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 83°41'02" EAST 60.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74°13'19" EAST 47.60 FEET ' TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF CHARLES MONSTER COUNTY ROAD SOUTHWEST, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 238.99 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 17°19'04" EAST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND • SOUTHERLY MARGIN 80.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°03 ' 09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 470.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°56'51" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN " 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°03'09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 26.53 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 1°22'40" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 1°22 '40" EAST 450. 00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, • CONTAINING 450,000 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY RE NTON, WASHINGTON i‘ NtFCF i, BRH JOB NO. 89219.04 � MARCH 22, 1990 ALH/SURV. 34 �.J �1 • TO r ;lONAL Ut.i't,(V'iiui YNl iL1 i I PUMP STATIC. AGREEMENT AND RECIPRICAL .ASEMENTS Legal Description of the JSC Property PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 6, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 • EAST, W.H. , ALL IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: • COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24, IN SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE, THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORM: EST QUARTER 1214.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST AND NOW KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 32°29'51" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 85.34 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48 r-ELT AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 139.14 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 1°24'51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 268.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET; MINCE SOUTH 02°33'12" WEST 115.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34" WEST 95.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°37'17" WEST 105.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°22'40" WEST 887.90 • FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF OAKESDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST AS CONVEYED TO TEE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8702100643, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88°02'28" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 16.02 FEET; • THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 524.90 FEET AND ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 194.06 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°45'53" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 147.08 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 842.73 FEET AND ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 81.56 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65°12'10" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 257.10 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF 72ND AVENUE SOUTHWEST AS CONVEYED TO TEE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8702100643 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A • RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 70.69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 24°46'SO" WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 24.57 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 180.00 FEET AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 82.35 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°05'23" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 81.81 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF CHARLES MONSTER ROAD AS VACATED BY ORDINANCE NO. 4123 OF TF2 • CITY OF RENTON AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8803070674, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. tit �1�� T,y, BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY '`� % RENTON, WASHINGTON �h OF .y,� " BRH JOB NO. 89219.06 4nie.!r�0 JUNE 6, 1990 2 ALH/ENG. 40 ��`F PUMP STAT. 1 AGREEMENT AND RECIPROCAL •ASEMENTS Legal Description of the Trust Property PARCEL 4—A: 7,a7( Ace .-Va. Z�fZ3- 9/ZZ THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 1,214. 00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 3 , CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST ALSO KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD NOW VACATED; THENCE SOUTH 32 ° 12 ' 33 " EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 85. 47 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET, AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 139. 14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°24 '51" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 268 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35' 09" WEST 436.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02°33 '12" WEST 115. 03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34" WEST 95.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°37 ' 17" WEST 105. 38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°22'40" WEST 179 .50 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF AN EASEMENT FOR RAILROAD SPUR LINE AS CONVEYED TO THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 5331102, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1°22 ' 40" WEST 258 . 40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°03 ' 08" WEST 283 . 40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54°28'10" WEST 482 . 84 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RAILROAD SPUR LINE EASEMENT; THENCE SOUTH 27°09 '57" EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 22.44 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 365.32 FEET, AND ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RAILROAD SPUR LINE EASEMENT 857.54 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 241, 997 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES ACROSS THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SECTION 24 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 6, SECTION 13 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , ALL IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24, IN SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE, THENCE NORTH 87°26 '48" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER 1214 . 00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST AND NOW KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 32 °29 'S1" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 85. 34 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256 . 48 FEET AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 139 . 14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 °24 ' 51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 268 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35' 09" WEST 436.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02°33 '12" WEST 115 . 03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34" WEST 95. 47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°37 ' 17" WEST 90. 38 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1°22 '40" WEST 888 . 05 FEET 1 PARCEL 4-A CONT'D TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF OAKESDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8702100643 , RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 88°02 '28" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 30. 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°22 '40" EAST 470.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°35'10" WEST 29 . 15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°22'40" EAST 40.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20°25'25" WEST 26.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°22 '40" EAST 40 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°35'10" WEST 29. 15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°22 '40" EAST 72. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°37'20" EAST 39 . 99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°22 '40" EAST 190.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°37 '17" EAST 30. 00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY FfiVR�" fr f'/ .4) RENTON, WASHINGTON pf BRE JOB NO. 89219 . 06 Q-; 1 f AUGUST 14 , 1990 I' ! z ALH/ENG. 40 ! ' 6^ a � � i r.. ,ttr oN:61%rfy . to 2 1U t:"V-LUl'v r;✓ ✓._.� .••- iVl C' HI.,l Ll� � PUMP STATI AGREEMENT AND RECIPROCAL ASEMENTS Legal Description of the B & G Property PARCEL 3: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24 IN SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER 1214.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST; rat.NCE SOUTH 32°29'51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 85.34 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET A DISTANCE OF 139.14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°24 '51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 268.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2°33' 12" WEST 115.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34" WEST 95.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°37' 17" WEST 105.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4°58'17" EAST 410.23 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED FILED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8606190933, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 46°16'56" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE 202.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 53°39'22" EAST ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 445.21 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 310,000 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. (441 r .� w 4' BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY 4F� 0f Sy RENTON, WASHINGTON sr, HRH JOB NO. 89219.04 c FEBRUARY 7, 1990 _ L ALH/BURN. 34 PARCEL 4-B: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24 IN SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST ALONG THE • NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER 1214 . 00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST; THENCE SOUTH 32°29'51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 85.34 .. FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET A DISTANCE OF 139. 14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°24 '51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 268. 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35' 09" WEST 436.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2°33 '12" WEST 115. 03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34" WEST 95.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 °37'17" WEST 105.38 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1°22 '40" WEST 437. 90 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°03 '09" WEST 283 . 04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54°28 '10" WEST 490.45 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT- OF-WAY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 1610. 67 FEET • TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8 , CHARLES MONSTER ROAD, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.37 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 58°59 '44" k. EAST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND WESTERLY MARGIN 250 . 58 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED FILED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8606190933 , RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 48 ° 12 ' 23 " WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE 420.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 9°01'55" EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 125 . 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 46°16'56" EAST ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 17. 69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 4°58'17" WEST 410.23 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF A RAILROAD SPUR EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED IN AUDITOR' S FILE NO. = 5331102 . PARCEL CONTAINS 370, 561 SQUARE FEET. TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES ACROSS THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, • W.M. , AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 6, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , ALL IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24 , IN ▪ SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE, THENCE NORTH R7°26 ' 48" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER 1214 . 00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST AND NOW KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 32 °29 ' 51" EAST, ALONG 1 PARCEL 4—B CONT'D SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 85.34 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 139 . 14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°24 '51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 268. 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02°33'12" WEST 115. 03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34" WEST 95.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°37'17" WEST 90.38 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1°22'40" WEST 888.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF OAKESDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8702100643, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 88°03 '09" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 30. 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°22 '40" EAST 470.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 °35 ' 10" WEST 29 . 15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH O1°22 '40" EAST 40. 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20°25'25" WEST 26.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°22 '40" EAST 40 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°35'10" WEST 29. 15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°22'40" EAST 72.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °37 ' 20" EAST 39 . 99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°22'40" EAST 190.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°37'20" EAST 30. 00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ��'"���'�'�- BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY (1+ i �a HI y/ RENTON, WASHINGTON t,�aF of y, " BRH JOB NO. 89219. 06 •t� �' 4 SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 iZ ALH/ENG. 40 ` A O o s cl /A( ,/ 2 EXHIBIT E TO REGIONAL DETENTION FACILITY PUMP STATION AGREEMENT AND RECIPROCAL EASEMENTS Legal Description of the Metro Property • Page E-1 of 1 • . . Fe - 23, 1990 E _ :eorua,y EX1IIBIT . . DESCRIPTION OF RENTON TREATMENT PLAIT PROPERTY 1 that portion of Government Lot 2, Government Lot 5, Government • t 6, Government Lot 8, the Northeast quarter of the Northwest - quarter, and .'the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of . :"`fiction 24, Township 23 North, Range. 4 East, H.M. , in King •County, c . Ishington, described as a whole as follows: G:Znmercing at the northeast corner of said Northeast quarter of the e 2. )rthwest quarter; theIIGe along the north line of said Northeast c Yarter of the Northwest quarter and along the north line of Government Lot 1 of said Section 24, N 87° 26 ' Z2" W 2693 . 05 feet to t-te northwest corner of said Government Lot 1; thence along the ,.aril ' line of said Gcverzuaent Lot 1 and Lot 5, 5 00° 26 '19" W _ 2299 .77 feet; thence S 89° 33 '41" E 1909.89 feet to an intersection :0,.th the easterly right-of-way margin of Monster Road established h o the City of Renton's alignment of August 3, 1988 and the TRUE ftINT OF BEGINNING being a point on a curve concave to the southwest the radius point of which bears S 63° 48 '40" W 367. 11 t:et; thence along said easterly right-of-way margin for the 1 :,• 11owing ten (10) courses: • . northerly along said curve an° arc tdistance of 147.50 feet - through a. central angle of 23 01 17 , , . i „ N 49° 12 '37" W 349.48 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 1726.79 feet, i northerly along said curve an arc distance of 256.14 feet . through a central angle of 08° 27'00", N 40° 45 '37" W 39.69 feet to the beginning of a curve to the - right having a radius of 190.37 feet, w • northerly . along said cu ve 8 c0'distance of 292.83 feet through a central angle of 88° 0 , i ., N 47° 22 '23" E 121.88 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 316.48 feet, northerly along said curve an arc distance of 159 . 08 feet . z through a central angle of 28° 48 ' 00", i N 18° 34 '23" E 317.29 feet to the beginning of a curve to the c . left having a radius of 316.48 feet, northerly .�ur distance of 110.47 feet along said Ye an arc _ through a central angle of 20 do 00 , .. . N 01° 25'37" W 619.41 feet to the southwest corner of a parcel. . of land conveyed to the Municipality of-Meapolitan Seattle - . • by First City Ecuities by Deed recorded under Regp c NumberVISION . .- i 8707080246 ; CITYOFRBYfON • AUG 0 4 1.992 I . ' fence continuing along said easterly right-of-way margin and along die westerly line of said parcel for the following four (4) • . courses: • • N 01° 25'37" W 64 .76 feet to the beginning of a curve to tie right having a radius of 120.00 feet, northerly along said curve an arc distance of 54 . 90 feet • through a central angle of 26° 12045", N 24° 47 '08" E 24.57 feet. to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 45.00 . feet, - - northerly along said curve an arc distance of 31.79 feet through a central angle of 40° 28 '16" to the westerly line of • a tract of land conveyed to Metro by Deed recorded under Recording Nn-nher 82007300283 : t,,,..ence along said westerly line N 22° .25 '3 6" W 16.05 f oet to the north line of said Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter; t ence along said north line S 87° • 26 '22" E 225. 60 feet to the w sterly corner of a tract of land conveyed to First City Equities oy Metro by Deed recorded under Recording Thr=,ber 8707080245 ; thence along the southwesterly line of said tract S 65° 13 '27" E 207.51 f et to an. intersection with a curve concave to the north, the _.,dius point of which bears N 4 0° 45'45" E 422. 96 feet and the aort.`Zerly line of a tract of land conveyed. to the Municipality of -«trcpolitan Seattle by Burlington Northern Railroad Conpany by D ed recorded under Recording Number 8207300283 ; thence along said an- herly iihg for the following five (5) courses: southeasterly along said curve- an arc distance of 294 . 02 feet • through a central angle of 39° 49 '.49°, S 89° Q4 ' 04" E 197.07 feet, S 73° 04 '20" . E 11.32 feet to an ' intersection with a curve concave to the northeast the radius point of which bears N 73° 17 '41" E 431.53 feet, • southeasterly along said curve an arc distance of 424 .53 feet through a central angle of 56° 22 'O1", • S 73° 04 '20" E 46.48 feet to the westerly line of a tract cf . land conveyed to Ring Ceuhty by the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle by Deed recorded under Recording Number «' 8112230430; . a • . n• ce along said westerly line for the -following four (4) courses: . S 73° 04 '20" E -88 .98 feet to the beginning of a curve to . tie -. right having-a radius of 307. 00 .Zeet, _ _ .__ ._ 2 • southerly along said curve an arc distance of 329.53 feet through a central angle of 61° 30 ' 00" , • S 11° 34 '20" E 749.46 feet, S 18° 38 '42" E 94.52 feet to the easterly line of a tract of land conveyed to the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle by Burlington Northern, Inc_ by Deed recorded under Recording Number 7106030382; thence along said easterly line S 11° 34 '20" E 316.52 feet; thence continuing along said easterly line N 78° 25 '40" E 39.27 feet to „.. the westerly line of a tract of land conveyed to King County by the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle by Deed recorded under " Recording Number 8112230430; thence along said westerly line S 18° 38 ' 42" E 95.96 feet to a tract of land established by King County Superior Court Cause No. 84-2-07769 7 and surveyed and-recorded in Book 40 of Surveys on Page 180, Recording NI/' her 8406149003 and amended by Affidavit recorded under Recording Number 8504110606; thence along said tract of land for the following ten (10) courses: N 77° 29 '35" E 0.70 feet to the westerly line of a tract of land conveyed to the City of Renton by Deed recorded under Recording Number 8212090480, S .18° 38 '50" E 100.58 feet to the southwest corner of said tract of land, S 77° 29 '35" W 644.15 feet along the southerly margin of the previous Burlington Northern Railroad Company right-of-way to the beginning of a curve to the left having a, radius of 905.37 feet, westerly along said curve and along said southerly margin an arc distance of 267.55 feet through a central angle of 16° 55'55" to the west line of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter, • S 01° 05'18" W 142. 62 feet along said west line to the northwesterly margin of that portion of the right-of-way of Primary State Highway No. 1 (Interstate 405) identified on the highway map recorded under Recording Number 5399478, as the B-Line, and a point on a curve concave to the south, the radius point of which bears S 02° 17 '58" 1 251. 00 feet, westerly along said curve and along said northwesterly margin an arc distance of 1744 .03 feet through a central angle of 39 43 '30",. ` continuing along said northwesterly margin S 47° 58 '32" W • 243_18 feet to the north line of said Government Lot 8, . • 3 • • along said north line N 87° 34 '15" W 16.07 feet to the . easterly margin• of the previous .Burlington Northern Railroad Company right-of-way -and a point on a curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 905.37 feet the radius point of which bears S 62° 24 '09" E, • southerly along said easterly margin and along said curve an arc distance of 181.53 feet through a central angle of 11° 29 '16" to a line parallel -with and 70.00 feet northwesterly of the centerline of Washington State Highway No. 1-L, along said parallel line .S 66° 53 '08" W 125.69 feet to the easterly line of 'a tract of . land conveyed to Schcber Enterprises, Inc. by. the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle; thence leaving said tract of land, established by Ring County .5uP ericr Court Cause No. 84-2-07769 7 and running thence along said .asterly line of Schober tract, N 04° 18 ' 03" W 14.69 feet; thence .ontinuing along said easterly •line N 06° 22 '10" W 321.59 feet to the southwesterly margin of the realignment of Monster Road; thence ontinuing along . said easterly line and along said southwesterly . argin, N 41° 55'32" W 68.65. feet to the southerly corner of a tract of land conveyed to the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Schober Enterprises, Inc. by Deed recorded under Recording timber 8903290812; thence continuing along said southwesterly 'argin and along the southerly line of said tract', N 41° .5 '32" W 125.99 -feet; thence continuing along .said southwesterly margin and }aid southerly line N. 69° 31'09" W 11.12 feet to said easterly ...ight-of-way margin of Monster Road established by the City of Renton '.s alignment of August-3, 1988 -and a point on curve concave 1101t-o the southwest the radius point of which bears N 87° 4 0 '16" N 57.11 feet; thence northerly along said margin an arc distance of 182 .72 feet through a central angle of 28° 31' 04" to the true point . of beginning. • • • • • • • • 4 • EXHIBIT F TO REGIONAL DETENTION FACILITY PUMP STATION AGREEMENT AND RECIPROCAL EASEMENTS Estimated Budget for the System 1) Construction Costs $59 , 355.00 2) Railroad Easement $22, 000.00 3) Puget Power $20, 000.00 4) Bush, Roed & Hitchings $20, 500.00 5) Permits $600.00 SUBTOTAL $122,455.00 6) 10s Contingency $12 , 245. 00 TOTAL $134, 700. 00 Page F-i of 1 M. j'U E(=LUIVr.L UL 1 J.J-UL L' tyL 1L11 PUMP STATE g AGREEMENT AND RECIPROCP BASEMENTS Easement Area on the Trust Property ON-SITE DRAINAGE EASEMENT DESCRIPTION PLUNDERS is PIPEPITI't.AS TRUST PROPERTY THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET IN WIDTH, HAVING 5.00 Ft.k:i OF SUCH WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF AN EASEMENT CENTERLINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL DESCRIBED IN DEED TO ELAND BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9006281432, RECORDS OF SAID KING COUNTY, THENCE NORTH 54°28 '10" EAST 80.00 ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE THEREOF TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID EASEMENT CENTERLINE; THENCE SOUTH 46°10'27" EAST 10.00 FEET ALONG SAID EASEMENT CENTERLINE TO THE TERMINUS THEREOF; THE SIDFT=TNES OF THIS EASEMENT SHALL BE SO SHORTENED OR LENGTHENED SO AS TO TERMINATE IN THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID ELAND PARCEL. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTE_RS TRUST REGIONAL DETENTION FACILITY te - WILLIAM A. HICKOX, P.L.S. i �' pf BRH JOB NO. 90369. 07 FEBRUARY 22, 1995 • c • . S z REVISED MARCH 27, 1995 \,rEr-t9 'fit.LA`S 1 omam low �I v :':lam ... 34:Pf5 T REG1UMAL utit,oitiuLv r til,lL1 PUMP STAT 1 AGREEMENT AND RECIPROCA' ,ASEMENTS Easement Area on the Eland Property ON—SITE DRAINAGE EASEMENT DESCRIPTION ELAND PROPERTY THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET IN WIDTH, HAVING 5.00 F�LT OF SUCH WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF AN EASEMENT CENTERLINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMEENCING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL DESCRIBED IN DEED TO ELAND BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9006281432, RECORDS OF SAID KING COUNTY, THENCE NORTH 5 4°2 8 '10" EAST 80.00 Fk:.t:l' ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE THEREOF TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID EASEMENT CENTERLINE; THENCE ALONG SAID EASEMENT CENTERLINE THE FOLLOWING FOUR COURSES: THENCE NORTH 46°10 '27" WEST 125. 66 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22°30 '42" WEST 282. 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 77°29 '18" WEST 23.04 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID ELAND PARCEL; THENCE NORTH 36°29 '33" WEST 12. 00 FEET TO THE TERMINUS OF SAID EASEMENT CENTERLINE AND FROM SAID TERMINUS SAID POINT OF COMMENCING BEARS SOUTH 22°15 '22" EAST 430.77 FEET DISTANT; 7XCF'PT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WESTERLY OF SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID ELAND PARCEL. THE SIDELINES OF THIS EASEMENT SHALL BE SO SHORTENED OR LENGTHENED SO AS TO MEET AT ANGLE POINTS AND TERMINATE IN THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID ELAND PARCEL. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS TRUST �� ^���• -� REGIONAL DETENTION FACILITY t� A.kIl�+ •• WILLIAM A. gICKOX, P.L.S. 4\ cft* : �O+ BRH JOB NO. 90369.07 :- �► FEBRUARY 22, 1995 • - �z a REVISED MARCH 27, 1995 ats ' ' • Ai• '4 a'W . 141.17 • 4 £ arm 'I �Z7-95 v) 4 2 Q. U ELAN BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP i , 1:> ., / DEED REC NO. 9006281432 M SCALE : 1- = 60' N z z U 4� a -. S46' 10' 27" E Q `P rye /t-` s. �' 10.00' H B `\ - . . ` 28 l� POINT ..A.. '- 2304.?8' 1a- W „ --_ ``1.00 _ 1 `t. — TERMINUS �, _', L `� - .-`i• I w w N A 6' 10 o O 'co O.W.R.R. & Nay.,Co. (U.P.R.R.) I " .\ NN Z POINT OF COMMENCING ON-SITE DRAINAGE EASEMENT SKETCH ,NF'•�r•'• \..Y- ~,•,�. wow tttc�o PREPARED FOR : PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS TRUST ' 3` °E "w + �� c T PROJECT : REGIONAL DETENTION FACILITY I ''- . .ttts,in B.R.H. sazi JOB NO. 90369.07 DATE : 2/27/95 1 wine: am 1- -�;` J; JSH,ROED& HITCHINGS,INC. 7-Z13 l' 'IL ENGINEERS&LAND SURVEYORS rTLE,WASHINGTDN 323 4144 EXHIBIT I TO REGIONAL DETENTION FACILITY I UIiP... STATEIONI AGREEMENT AND RECIPROCAL ESEMENTS . ... ;�;-4 . Sketch of Easements SUMMARY OF RESULTS EXISTING CONDITIONS: (Parcels 1 & 2 Developed) Area: 43 .7 acres Pervious Area: 27.8 acres Impervious Area: 15.9 acres Tc: 33 .66 min. Cn: 85 FLOWS AND POND WATER SURFACE WITH 30" CMP OVERFLOW ELEV 12 .5 1/2 2 yr Q = 2.33 cfs 2 yr peak Q = 7.80 cfs 2 yr max W.S. = 11. 66' 10 yr peak Q = 13. 93 cfs 10 yr max W.S. = 12 . 23 ' 100 yr peak Q = 21. 99 cfs 100 yr max W.S. = 12 .89' 100yr/7day peak Q = 13 .91 cfs 100yr/7day max W.S.= 13 . 29 ' max 100yr/7day W.S. with 30" cmp flap gate closed = 15. 47' DEVELOPED CONDITIONS: (Future Full Development) Area: 44 . 0 acres (includes Parcel 3 Offsite) Pervious Area: 18 . 50 acres Impervious Area: 25 .50 acres Tc: 33 .12 min Cn: 85 FLOWS AND WATER SURFACE WITH PUMP DISCHARGE OF 2 . 33 cfs ( 1046 gal/min) AT START-UP ELEV 11 . 78 ' AND POND W.S. @ 10 . 5' 2 yr peak Q = 9 .15 cfs 2 yr max W.S. = 11 .78 ' 10 yr peak Q = 15.27 cfs 10 yr max W.S . = 11 . 94 ' 100 yr peak Q = 23 .23 cfs 100 yr max W.S. = 12 .58' 100yr/7day peak Q = 14 .29 cfs 100yr/7day max W.S.= 13 . 00 ' max 100yr/7day W.S. with pump shut off = 16 . 30' BRH NO. 90369 .04 APRIL 12 , 1993 iul1IuIe9' I ( I y. .i ,, ''+••.,-�.•• 4;'. 1• ,, • ,r F. .v, .fit,i.• r• +': ,,i. �� _ \\` E ,__. ,,•N\ X33 ••---"-- Itif.,„:„....,,,...41, „44.1 .. •• .. .,. .. ....N.... ... ....„..., _ . .. . ..:_.....,.... __. 7(.6 - 17 X — -..e'' .••_....\,,,,_ _-:--T-%i--4..'r-„-_ . �l";.r :le'' ..... d'41;, '•'.'tv:,..,�;� •:r:r iajormo�TA I• 1 sot I.,v:. .• i ,�;~�� S W i I ;.c�' ✓.,-;,�•.;.'! :,�-.t.�sC9rLL..�.' ui.' ., 'L':,:o•,_- l 4 1 .tk:.. \ =...„zi (__,___,____,j7-74 i'I .1 , `if'.',--1�IW"�4t 4vr•1,'1,+„"'�':^"t' :.f.•:••. ., , . a.,,,,.. '};.' �:'i�"'T' "� \~'III 1 F j?ep.1� 4C s'DlM. .:.. 1:+ I?(ae9 p4+ : t1 6'i l'.'e --- ,` �` 'n9Y,lam- • ,��� l• ; q :4 '+y,-7:•1.•• '• ••:•••vd., ' r•a� A 1.1 f t:..::,•u.".7 '.0:bMM.!,cl•.,,.. ,.:tt E:, : ` , i '+ �,1,• _ 1 I`'• .r f 4,: ma.. i4. :.,,G�'1 `,..•.;„..i.:pglb r; !i ;. 4 \ \ • ' tt" .. a 1 .: h e •I.- �.r+'. Mc y, ; r�1�n \ :, fi I EX IST'I,Illa.;GOr1T/jl if 1 . � tiw " * dR -no N A. 'it 1 3I •\ t. 1 ..;;1tqq.� x 7 �,. ,. n�l+l u.#+ l e. I Ex,sT, y\ !S �. :0: , 'u,-,1:• ' 3;, I if. � '(`',� 46•lA�-E.,(�' _ :,I ''I .', na C«N,.a. : 11 A�: ''1\ ♦ I r . . ,F.1,' . ^. ,t. ,,,.1'� u i T 1� (. 1`,b1t+lE 1V rJ' l,t I., - :�•�l.', x',._.�"+2!1, ( . , :/ f.• II l II 1.1 `> " ► ? i • 31- , >� i • III )1; • . r.) • ` •' 1-11 �, sD \ �` 4 / la/ .,.. t \\. . V\ \N„/ /' 7 '. Iiiil \ \ . \\••• \ A... ) •-. ,' ,„flif\.._ -:__:::,._ ,. ..,•;•...4>...:,....itz ,N.,T,,, ,i. ,. ./. . ._ ......... -, 1 \, .7-, ,. \ ..., . \ ,..,,,,\ ,,. /.......* #,,, f,.i.‘% 4 ...._ __ _.... i ; . f i'.. \: *\\ \ ' c,:iv.6.* A 9 ‘N4d .‘ \ \ .s. • •0/6'Ea V I' 3. i .. , ,1 (.2_., .7 t,N-\ c"-s: •• I- --•r—/ •C. i • '.. \ \ \ . 1'-;*‘4\\ *. `i IS .if,. ' /t.:' , ___ . ky __-_._- , .:\.. • �' , .1). ia IIIL i'II' 1 r-.__ ---- Atr,• ., :12-/3..2////, • .• • • . t I/ li ?••(:-.2 -"'...4'\‘\\-A ' ' •( • ',' 1 \ .'t • ‘ 1 , „ \‘ (( i I, i• 1 .e. \\ki. \,‘ t I I A\ • . ':-,\ ,..- % •.\ 1 I I it .„)....) __::.1:1 I lir • i;.„,/,,.,,/.0 1 + ` ^` •• 11•.\ 4 \r .)•.••,. ,� I� \\• \• ' \�.�/. //./. •. �/ �i 1:.) ...7..:...-.._ = 5 :.... "'- '_ice.-'. •1 ,irW.. .i -c, ,-, • \ /�i --.1-,, , . . ‘, , , /..._ ................... .. .. ._-.....- __\ :J• j� `, CULT. FIELD • \ f �/ // /, .. \ III /� /d ' ` "-\ \ \ • i-•I 2 l's \\ ./...- ,,, --,- -.. ......„ ''',...... \: ., • >7. .•/- . I \ X 2 7 • • \ ',... zil ToTA . AREA = 43.1 Ac. . /� PR•AttJA& BASIt,I (EX1ST44(.. ) SN1pER\11o�S AREA aLAtJD c B,So Aa . • PA2U4E. St-LIME. cafriPAMY Ga1JT Lo%:P 1,4 pe„. • 4a.W•L, MorlSTER RD. 1 OAKL'SOAL . ANC". S.w. To'TAI = 1 G.c1 Ac.. .'''•.. Re►J-rorl wAstat nlm.Towl • BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. • CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS . SEATTLE.WASHINGTON gl SCALE ,. DATE I DRAWN .106 NO • r. U 7 // 1 //� y • .' t 1 ter„-,.• . ._: - • 1 • -)c-A\ - ---. ;.ate x / / '•!'r' .'•; / • 17 1 r ' +F .may • ;./7....--'':. ./.... : . .. .mot , �. x 3J %• r1+t' ' } �.. � ' 4.r.: Y,•.. i• . • ..,. 3o\�i1 ' .'k'['�� . Sir ..S�-,,,..37...:::::••"'-"...." %.\""" - . I / vt?'' R •••.',.. •i •r'1 'M. •L'..• 4'•.C....'-F is 'el • ^T—r—T-L"7:: •\�� aV8 • II �y''r'a:,:�"�ti��'•w,.e:.i M.i+�'.'�oi' �. •� i�l '::•wti�.w• r�� .:1/4.1' `: \ t.J - ' ' •4 X......Z:411 •' i — '". 4 ir..,, :I I I I. • ! L1 1wt Au:•*!y ;: 'irn'-'»te a,., 4 11 nti. ,. .Nii \\\_ ,„. ��. .r'.nak�. �y' r Ip ',i 1 'e: tE.' "r4Cw(�ct^ ' \\ 1•t i, ,! I�` 'EXIST!'.. ai."GotJTAika ; .1 :+ \.. , •ti 7(17,.111 {:+ `t, 01CIST, /` I S 11' 1l 'h1 1�•,.y''' J '�i ":; ,,•r ..0.:al+,�(t.,:'r'� +'f4: '., •i.. 1 \'• \',\4H.13 `•,, \� \\` N 11 11 ,,•,4 'V M I rI�'Elm'I .ii 1 \������_ , I 1 I i. r ♦ / ` i `X/,� , t i I %.( ` \‘, \'' \\.• ' -- - ',is' '''''''`,..„,. \ l'",!`iti, -; . __\i \ ... ``•4. • `• r<SY. 1 1 �I i,. it'''r ••,rt. (iv IC::: 1 • ' 4,� II \ •\\ ' z`.a \ , , '' '. `y f 'k'1' I .__ - • • • \\M . • \Ott vol.,: .1.: , e•i , ' ‘ .• .... . •••\ i I il 61--,1,1) li , - ,s, -9,,,iii,.t, , ,, ,, •.- .---:-.-- .....-- ,,_ .,...,:.,. .....„... ,t. ;,,..,__,--i—x 1 .i k,„‘1 1 I 1.• 1,'.. '-,....- N . '.. . • \ A \:.' 4'.)''•. '• i, I'' lil ;'ii''' :/. ' \Qi,,, ' , ! / I/Illf •� Al ,,\ . Nr.%N ii , it ,.!/. ,•-•" . i, \ .....\ ... .. \ . •, .:. • • 1:1 `• + • t III • 1 1 x ' V. 1 t j)j))1> + • ` \ i' '\ ', ,\ S2 ,rs ► l4110 // J . 1 :"I i) . % \ •.,,,,...._3 : i_./10., . .• 5 ---....—,.--<-. -"" /b. ''-' i . ' . . N ,.....___., 7.,--,,,/,'X';y. ,?/,'",....<„,..1.-- - , cc- __ - . w . CULT. FIELD t\4 \ / f ` j/ ....••• , • i'AII 11 11 Il 1 // 1 \\ .20�i��"":�. ram,\•\. ." 1�'\ ,//! 4.-rrr' - fk5,.i: 1g3 k:•f„'• ,.• : \\ - .--,6-------------::::•!-----::::--:..„10,1!-----, . ••••. .., a ' '-.., ..„_.: Oi / • /. \\\\X \ x 27 .-•- .\\\\ \.\ rO TN.- AREA 44.,0 Arc.. DRAR-1Aes•E P>AS IN PEvE►-oPED) '--MPER\/IOQS AREA tLAtJD ; 6,5o AL. Pt)RUcE. S1.UME CoMPAAY GOh1T. GOP.?' • c 10.50 At., S.W.G. MoIJSTER Rom. i OAI ES►DAL.E. AVE,. S.W. PARCEL 4P = 2 .4o Etc. . Rel4T401-1 WASLI 10dpTo►.J PARcEL 4-g = 1..40 Arc. BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS PARS-EL. '�, INC.5,1p p,�. , CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS VEYORS TO'TA L. 'Ls.cc. 4.4. • SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 323-4144 SCALE I"•100 DATE OAwN •oce p �- ‘...„in., � R :SAL. qto•><L..4 � ;. • 4/ 12/93 Bush , Roed & Hitchir.gs , Inc ;,age STORM DRAINAGE PUMPING SYSTEM - - FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY • BRH NO. 90369.04 APRIL 12 , 1993 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY yK� / BASIN ID: 1 /2X2 NAME: S0% EXISTING 2YR , 24HR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 43.70 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION. . . . : 0.98 inches AREA. . : 27.80 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10.00 Min CN 85.00 TIME OF CONC • 33.66 Min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 15.90 A:res CN • 96.00 TcReach - Sheet L: 300.00 n5:0.4000 p2yr: 1 . 96 s :0.2200 TcReach - Shallow L: 600.00 ks: 9.00 s :0. 1000 TcReach - Chan - 1 L: 600.00 kc:21 .00 s :0 .0100 PEAK RATE: ® cfs VOL: 1 .39 Ac-ft TIME: 480 nir 3 2 .1 \) >4 ('7, 46 0 T ci ([o o - l , 0 4 (o n e1 l ; , TIME DESIGN TIME OESI611 TIME OESI6H TINE OESIE1 TIN: OESr6, ff., RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RuNF;" (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min: (cfs in:r (ifs 322L 3 L 2 S....i i... 10 350 0.4771 690 0.9554 1030 0.6681 1370 0.61E1 1710 0.o:_: 20 360 0.5120 700 0.9489 1040 0.6512 1380 0.6177 17:0 0.2::: 30 370 0.5419 710 0.9450 1050 0.6351 1390 0.6490 1730 0.0E21 40 380 0.5664 720 0.9442 1060 0.6305 1100 0.653 1740 50 390 0.5881 730 0.9453 1070 0.6216 1410 0.6516 1 S3 60 400 0.6070 740 0.9479 1080 0.6206 1423 0.6529 1760 70 410 0.6599 750 0.9514 1090 0.6180 1430 0.6542 177C 80 420 0.7389 760 0.9558 1100 0.6165 119: 0.653: 17E: 90 930 0.8020 770 0.9342 1110 0.6157 1150 0.6713 179: 100 440 0.8979 780 0.8931 1120 0.6156 146E 0.4233 1200 110 0.0006 450 1.0191 790 0.8637 1130 0.6109 1470 0.314: 181 O 120 0.0041 460 1.2780 800 0.8429 1190 0.6164 1480 0.2325 1320 130 0.0119 470 1.8906 810 0.8289 1150 0.617: 1490 3.17:: 1153: 140 0.0227 480 2.3299 820 0.8187 1160 0.61E3 1500 0.127' 129E 150 0.0353 490 2.2864 830 0.8124 1170 0.6194 1510 0.0942 1853 160 0.0491 500 2.1009 840 0.8088 1180 0.5236 1520 0.0703 166: •" 170 0.0665 510 1.9140 850 0.8070 1190 0.62IE 1E32 0.0321 1E72 180 0.0872 520 1.7838 860 0.8067 1200 0.523! 1510 0.03E5 1880 190 0.1077 530 1.6302 870 0.8074 1210 0.5245 !SSC 0.01E5 1290 200 0.1276 540 1.4568 880 0.8088 1220 0.6238 1560 0.0:12 190 210 0.1968 550 1.3317 890 0.7978 1230 0.6272 157E 0.01 S7 191 220 0.1652 560 1.2422 900 0.7774 1240 0.6286 153E 0.01!7 1977 230 0.1880 S70 1.1791 910 0.7630 1250 0.6300 1590 0.0C37 1930 240 0.2146 580 1.1355 920 0.7530 1260 0.6314 1600 0.0061 1910 250 0.2388 590. 1.1063 930 0.7463 1270 0.6323 1612 0.0042 19S0 260 0.2610 600 1.0878 940 0.7420 1280 0.6342 1620 0.0077 196" 270 0.2814 610 1.0770 950 0.7394 1290 0.6335 1630 0.0026 1372 280 0.3002 620 1.0721 960 0.7383 1300 0.6369 1510 0.0215 115C 290 0.3260 630 1.0713 970 0.7381 1310 0.63E3 1650 0.0014 1990 - 300 0.3573 640 1.0737 980 0.7386 1320 0.5357 1662 0.0011 2000 310 0.3846 650 1.0523 990 0.7396 1330 0.6410 1670 0.000E 2010 320 0.4087 660 1.0130 1000 0.7410 1340 0.6424 1620 0.0006 2020 330 0.4300 670 0.9857 1010 0.7233 1350 0.6437 169u 0.0001 2030 340 0.4491 680 0.9673 1020 0.6914 1360 0.6451 1700 0.0003 2040 4/12/93 Bush , Roed & Hitchings , Inc page 2 STORM DRAINAGE PUMPING SYSTEM FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY BRH NO. 90369.04 APRIL 12 , 1993 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: X2/24 NAME: EXISTING 2YR , 24HR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 43.70 Acres BASEFLOUS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION. . . . : 1 . 95 inches AREA. . : 27.80 Acres TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 10.00 min CN 85.00 TIME OF CONC • 33.66 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 15. 90 Acres CN 98.00 TcReach - Sheet L: 300.00 ns :0.4000 p2yr: 1 . 95 s:0.2200 TcReach - Shallow L: 600.00 ks :9.00 s :0. 1000 TcReach - Channel L: 600.00 kc:21 .00 s :0.0100 PEAK RATE: 7.80 cfs VOL: 4 .04 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min TIME DESIGN TINE OESISH TICS DESIS5 TIME OESI6N TIME DESIGN TIME OESIGH RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (nun) (cfs) (tun) (cfs) (nun) (cfs) (min) (cis) (nir.) (cfs) 10 350 1.3131 690 2.7711 1030 1.7950 1370 1.6791 1710 0.0006 20 360 1.4183 700 2.7404 1010 1.7474 1380 1.6760 1720 0.0005 30 370 1.5153 710 2.7206 1050 1.7127 1390 1.677E 1730 0.0003 40 380 1.6055 720 2.7088 1060 1.6876 1900 1.6796 1740 0.0002 SO 390 1.6899 730 2.7028 1070 1.6696 1410 1.6815 1750 0.0002 60 0.0021 400 1.7693 740 2.7012 1080 1.6568 1120 1.6833 1760 0.0001 70 0.0124 410 1.9576 750 2.7028 1090 1.6479 1430 1.6851 1770 0.0001 80 0.0328 920 2.2333 760 2.7066 1100 1.6419 1440 1.6E69 1780 90 0.0595 430 2.4670 770 2.6384 1110 1.6381 1450 1.4695 1790 100 0.0897 190 2.8175 790 2.5162 1120 1.6358 1460 1.0894 1800 110 0.1297 150 3.2633 790 2.4272 1130 1.6346 1470 0.8076 1810 120 0.1781 960 4.2070 600 2.3529 1140 1.6344 1980 0.5987 1820 130 0.2258 470 6.335? 810 2.3167 11 60 1.6347 1490 0.1439 1830 140 0.2718 180 7.7960 820 2.2941 1160 1.6355 1500 0.3291 1840 150 0.3153 490 7.5891 830 2.2611 1170 1.6367 1510 0.2940 1850 160 0.3561 500 6.9111 847 2.2462 1180 1.6381 1520 0.1809 1860 170 0.1078 510 6.2420 850 2.2364 1190 1.6397 1530 0.1341 1870 180 0.4682 520 5.7612 960 2.2306 1200 1.6414 1540 0.0994 1880 190 0.5220 530 5.2203 870 2.2278 1210 1.6132 1550 0.0737 1890 200 0.5698 540 4.6304 880 2.2271 1220 1.6451 1560 0.0516 1900 210 0.6125 550 4.1991 890 2.1926 1230 1.6470 1570 0.0405 1910 220 0.6506 560 3.8852 900 2.1327 1240 1.6489 1580 0.0300 1920 230 0.7021 S70 3.6583 910 2.0994 1250 1.6509 1590 0.0223 1930 240 0.7639 580 3.4957 920 2.0594 1260 I.6579 1600 0.016S 1940 ZSO 0.8162 590 3.3806 933 2.0364 1270 1.6548 1610 0.0122 1950 260 0.8609 600 3.3007 940 2.0212 1280 1.6568 1620 0.0091 1960 270 0.8993 610 3.2467 9E0 2.0109 1290 1.6588 1630 0.0067 1970 280 0.9326 620 3.211E 950 2.0044 1300 1.6607 1610 0.0050 1980 290 0.9852 630 3.1910 972 2.0005 1310 1.6627 1650 0.0037 1990 300 1.0524 640 3.1806 960 1.9987 1320 1.6646 1660 0.0027 2000 310 1.1072 650 3.102? 990 1.9983 1330 1.6665 1670 0.0020 2010 320 1.1523 660 2.9741 1000 1.9990 1340 1.6684 1680 0.001 S 2020 330 1.1927 670 2.8818 1010 1.9466 1350 1.6703 1690 0.0011 2030 340 1.2355 680 2.8165 1 020 1.8600 1360 1.6722 1700 0.0008 2040 4/12/93 Bush , Roed & Hitchings , Inc pane '4 1 STORM DRAINAGE PUMPING SYSTEM '. FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY BRH NO. 90369.04 APRIL 12 , 1993 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY .116 BASIN ID: X10 NAME: EXISTING 10YR , 24HR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 43.70 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2.85 inches AREA. . : 27.80 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 rein CN • 85.00 TIME OF CONC • 33.66 Min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 15.90 Acres CN • 98.00 TcReach - Sheet L: 300.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1 . 9E s :C .2200 TcReach - Shallow L: 600.00 ks:9.00 5 :0. 1000 TcReach - Channel L: 600.00 kc:21 .00 s :0.0100 PEAK RATE: 13.93 cfs VOL: 6 .86 Ac-ft TIME: 480 Mir. TINE OESIEH TIME DESIGN TINE DESIGN TINE ESISN TIME OESISN 1Ir.: ncc::1, RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUN thin) (cfs) thin) (cfs) thin) (cfs) thin) (cfs) thin' (cis) th:r. (cfs 10 350 2.6050 690 4.6126 1030 2.3918 1370 2.6557 1710 0.0010 20 360 2.8167 700 4.5514 1040 Z.3166 1380 2.6617 1722. 0.0007 30 370 3.0013 710 4.5146 1050 2.7592 1390 2.6636 1732 0.0605 40 0.0014 380 3.1646 720 4.4884 1060 Z.7173 1406 2.6655 1710 5.05C' 50 0.0158 390 3.3109 730 1.4723 1070 2.6869 1410 2.6671 1752 0.0003 60 0.0512 900 3.4434 740 4.4636 1080 2.6650 1420 2.6693 1763 0.G332 70 0.1010 110 3.7779 750 4.4602 1090 2.6494 143C 2.671: 17?: " 0::: 80 0.1581 120 4.2711 760 4.4609 1100 2.6336 1110 2.673' 1721 0.022' 90 0.2180 430 4.6784 770 4.3135 1110 2.6310 1150 2.32E: 1753 100 0.2778 440 5.2924 780 4.1382 1120 2.6260 1460 1.7265 1800 110 0.3536 450 6.0715 790 3.9877 1130 2.6230 117G 1.2796 1810 120 0.1125 460 7.7279 800 3.8780 1140 2.62!= 1480 0.91:6 16:0 130 0.5243 470 11.1454 810 3.7985 11 S0 2.6207 1193 0.7032 1 E3: 140 0.5988 480 13.9285 820 3.7413 1160 2.6209 1500 0.5214 1216 150 0.6660 490 13.4573 830 3.7006 1170 2.6216 1510 0.3555 1250 160 0.7265 500 12.1992 890 3.6722 1180 Z.6227 1520 0.2855 1 E6: 170 0.8059 510 10.9643 850 3.6528 1190 2.6211 1530 0.2121 1870 180 0.8999 520 10.0677 860 3.6901 1200 2.6257 1510 0.1575 18E 190 0.9799 530 9.0829 870 3.6323 1 210 2.6271 1550 0.1167 189E 200 1.0484 540 9.0269 880 3.6282 1220 2.6293 1560 0.0656 1503 210 1.1072 550 7.2514 890 3.5691 1230 2.6313 1570 0.0642 1910 220 1.1580 560 6.6837 900 3.4691 1240 2.6333 I SEG 0.0173 1920 230 1.2311 570 6.2698 910 3.3961 1250 2.6353 1 S90 0.0352 1930 240 1.3212 580 5.9699 920 3.3432 1260 2.637E 1600 0.0261 1910 250 1.3957 590 5.7541 930 3.3052 1270 2.6394 1610 0.0191 1952 260 1.4662 600 5.6007 940 3.2781 1280 2.641S 1620 0.0141 !9E0 270 1.5414 610 5.4932 950 3.2592 1290 2.6435 1630 0.0107 197E 280 1.6203 620 5.4198 960 3.2463 1300 Z.6456 1640 0.0079 19E0 290 1.7158 630 5.3713 970 3.2379 1310 2.647? 1650 0.0059 1990 300 1.9085 640 5.3113 980 3.2328 1320 2.6197 1660 0.0043 2000 310 2.0566 650 5.2002 990 3.2300 1330 2.651? 1670 0.0032 2010 320 2.1925 660 4.9757 1000 3.2291 1340 2.653? 1690 0.002' 2020 330 2.3182 670 4.8129 1010 3.1458 1350 2.655? 1690 0.0013 2030 340 2.4351 680 4.6959 1020 3.0013 1360 2.65?? 1700 0.0013 2010 4/12/93 Bush , Roed & Hitchings , Inc page 4/ STORM DRAINAGE PUMPING SYSTEM FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY BRH NO. 90369.04 APRIL 12 , 1993 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: X1O0 NAME: EXISTING 1OOYR , 24HR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 43.70 Acres BASEFLOL1S: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : USER] PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3.95 inches AREA. . : 27.80 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 85.00 TIME OF CONC • 33.66 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 15.90 Acres CN. . . . 98.00 TcReach - Sheet L: 300.00 ns:O.4OOO p2yr : 1 . 95 5 :O.22O0 TcReach - Shallow L: 600.00 k.s : 9.0O s :O. 1OOO TcReach - Channel L: 600.00 kc:21 .00 s :O.O1OO PEAK RATE: 21 .99 cfs VOL: 10.51 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min TIME DESIGN TINE DESIGN TINE OESIGH TINE DESIGN TINE DESIGN TINE DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (rani (cfs) (nin) (cfs) inic} (cfs) (nun) (cfs) (nun) (cfs) (inn) (cfs) 10 350 4.5212 690 6.9211 1030 4.2496 1370 3.8659 1710 0.0019 20 360 4.9531 700 6.8261 1040 1.1332 1380 3.8678 1720 0.0010 30 0.0026 370 5.1357 710 6.7593 1050 4.0476 1390 3.8697 1730 0.0008 40 0.0294 380 5.3799 720 6.7132 1060 3.9847 1400 3.8715 1740 0.0006 50 0.0941 390 5.5938 730 6.6824 1070 3.9388 1410 3.9731 1750 0.0004 60 0.1827 400 5.7936 740 6.6630 1080 3.9054 1420 3.8752 1760 0.0003 70 0.2918 410 6.3029 750 6.6519 1090 3.8812 1430 3.8770 1770 0.0002 80 0.3830 4Z0 7.0782 760 6.6469 1100 3.8639 1410 3.8788 1780 0.0002 90 0.4813 430 7.70d9 770 6.4670 1110 3.8517 1450 3.3779 1790 0.0001 100 0.5740 440 8.6574 780 6.1568 1120 3.8433 1460 2.5042 1800 110 0.6910 450 9.8653 790 5.9288 1130 3.8377 1470 1.9565 1810 120 0.8271 460 12.4445 800 5.7616 1140 3.8341 1480 1.3763 182C 130 0.9468 470 18.2147 810 5.6395 1150 3.8320 1490 1.0203 1830 140 1.0516 480 21.9922 820 5.5508 1160 3.8311 1500 0.7564 1840 150 1.1429 490 21.1946 830 5.4868 1170 3.8309 1510 0.5608 1850 160 1.2114 500 19.0961 84C 5.4411 1180 3.8314 1520 0.4157 1860 170 1.3311 510 17.1028 850 5.4090 1190 3.8324 1530 0.3082 1870 180 1.4619 520 15.6463 96C 5.3869 1200 3.8336 1540 0.2295 1880 190 1.5697 530 11.0715 870 5.3722 1210 3.8351 1550 0.1694 1890 200 1.6632 540 12.4024 980 5.3629 1220 3.8368 1560 0.1256 1900 210 1.7579 550 11.1732 990 5.2727 1230 3.8386 1570 0.0931 1910 220 1.8612 560 10.2699 900 5.1224 1240 3.8404 1580 0.0690 1920 230 2.0213 570 9.6079 910 5.0121 1250 3.8423 1590 0.0512 1930 Z10 2.2268 520 9.1246 920 4.9315 1260 3.8443 1600 0.0379 1940 250 2.4174 590 8.7736 930 4.8730 1270 3.8463 1610 0.0231 1950 260 2.5946 600 8.5204 940 4.8308 1290 3.8483 1620 0.0208 1960 270 2.7601 610 8.3396 950 4.8006 1290 3.8503 1630 0.0155 1970 280 2.9150 620 8.2122 960 4.7794 1300 3.8522 1610 0.0115 1980 290 3.1103 630 9.1242 970 4.7648 1310 3.8542 1650 0.0085 1990 300 3.4213 610 8.0652 980 4.7551 1320 3.8562 1660 0.0063 2000 310 3.6673 650 7.8109 990 4.7490 1330 3.8582 1670 0.0047 2010 320 3.8852 660 7.4929 1000 4.7455 1340 3.8601 1620 0.0035 2020 330 1.0801 670 7.2388 1010 1.6214 1350 3.8621 1690 0.0026 2030 340 4.2572 680 7.0542 1020 4.4075 1360 3.8640 1700 0.0019 2040 4/12/93 Bush , Roed & Hitchings , Inc page Gs STORM DRAINAGE PUMPING SYSTEM FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY BRH NO. 90369.04 APRIL 12 , 1993 =a=_=_ a== ===-=aaa====a:aaaaa=s=a= = DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: X1007 NAME: EXISTING 100YR , 7DAY SBUH METHODOLOGY • TOTAL AREA • 43.70 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • KC7 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 9.80 inches AREA. . : 27.80 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 60.00 Min CN • 85.00 TIME OF CONC • 33.66 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 15.90 Acres CN. . . . . 98.00 TcReach - Sheet L: 300.00 ns :0.4000 p2yr: 1 .95 s:0.2200 TcReach - Shallow L: 600.00 ks :9.00 s :0. 1000 TcReach - Channel L: 600.00 kc:21 .00 s :0.0100 PEAK RATE: 13.91 cfs VOL: 27.83 Ac-ft TIME: 3300 in = TINE OESIGH TIME OESIRH TIME OE5I6M TINE OESIGH TIn; OE5IGH 1InE GESiG!, RUNOFF Neff RUNOFF RUNOFF RU'IOFF Min (nin) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (nth) (cfs) (nth) (cfs) (mir.: (cfs) (ntn; (cfs 60 2100 1.7373 4140 2.8816 6180 1.8440 8220 1.38E2 10260 0.0021 120 2160 1.7865 4200 2.8879 6240 1.8453 8280 1.3E83 10320 0.00 180 0.0107 2220 1.8272 4260 2.9942 6300 1.8465 8310 1.3E67 1038C 240 0.0573 2280 1.8651 4320 2.9002 6360 1.8478 8100 1.387: 10142 300 0.1243 2340 1.9018 4380 2.9061 6420 1.8490 8462 1.3877 10500 360 0.1807 2400 1.9364 4440 2.9118 6480 1.8502 8520 1.3391 10560 420 0.2263 2460 Z.1179 4500 2.9174 6510 1.8514 8581 1.38E3 10622 480 0.2636 2520 2.3112 4560 Z.6837 6600 1.8525 8640 1.38:' 106ES 540 0.2945 2580 2.3597 4620 2.4353 6660 1.8537 8701 1.3895 10112 600 0.3201 2640 2.3980 4680 2.1243 6720 1.8518 8760 1.3860 10800 660 0.3424 2700 2.4339 4740 2.4270 6780 1.8559 8220 1.380' 10833 720 0.3611 2760 2.4680 4800 Z.4304 6840 1.8571 8E20 1.3 G6 10925 780 0.4263 2820 2.5005 4860 2.4337 6900 1.8592 8940 1.3913 10980 840 0.1955 2880 3.0395 4920 2.4370 6960 1.8592 9005 1.3917 11016 900 0.5168 2940 3.6196 1980 2.4102 7020 1.8603 9060 1.382' 11103 960 0.53Z7 3000 3.7048 5040 2.4433 7080 1.6321 9120 1.3926 1116C 1020 0.5463 3060 4.3685 5100 2.4464 7140 1.3911 9180 1.3930 11220 1080 0.5580 3120 5.0792 5160 2.449i 7200 1.3778 9210 1.3931 1128E 1140 0.5696 3180 6.2632 5220 2.4524 7260 1.3775 930C 1.74:'" 11312 1200 0.6470 3240 9.3251 5280 2.4553 7320 1.3780 936E 1.3942 11400 1260 0.7454 3300 13.9057 5340 2.4582 7380 1.3786 942C 1.394E 1116G 1320 0.7959 3360 12.7065 5400 Z.1614 7440 1.3791 948C 1.3960 11520 1380 0.8110 3420 7.3751 5460 1.8467 7500 1.3797 9510 1.3954 11580 1140 0.8834 3480 5.1173 5520 1.8300 7560 1.3802 9600 1.385E 11610 1500 0.9236 3540 4.3311 5580 1.8305 7620 1.3807 9665 1.39E2 11700 1560 0.9616 3600 4.3054 5640 1.8318 7680 1.3813 9720 1.3966 11760 1620 1.0840 3660 4.3225 5700 1.8333 7740 1.3818 97E0 1.3970 11820 1680 1.2155 3720 3.6271 5760 1.9347 7800 1.3823 984C I.3974 1188C 1740 1.2651 3780 2.8851 5820 1.8361 7860 1.3828 9900 1.3973 11940 1800 1.3078 3840 2.8495 5880 1.8379 7920 1.3833 9960 3.3932 12000 1860 1.3481 3900 2.8541 5940 1.8388 7980 1.3838 10020 1.3985 12060 1920 1.3863 3960 2.8614 6000 1.8401 8040 1.3843 1008C 1.3989 12120 1980 1.4227 4020 2.8683 6060 1.8414 8100 1.3848 10140 0.7398 12180 2040 1.5747 4080 2.8750 6120 1.9127 8160 1.3853 10200 0.0426 12240 4/12/93 Bush , Roed & Hatchings , Inc page tel STORM DRAINAGE PUMPING SYSTEM FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY BRH NO. 90369.04 APRIL 12 , 1993 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: 02/24 NAME: DEVELOPED 2YR , 24HR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 44 .00 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 1 .9S inches AREA. . : 18.50 Acres TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 10.00 min CN. . . . : 81 .00 TIME OF CONC • 33. 12 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 25.60 Acres CN • 98.00 TcReach - Sheet L: 300.00 ns :O.4OOO p2yr: 1 .95 s:O.22OO TcReach - Shallow L: 200.00 ks :27.00 s :O.O15O TcReach - Channel L: 800.00 kc:42.00 s :O.00S0 TcReach - Channel L: 200.00 kc :42 .00 s :O. 1OOO TcReach - Channel L: S00.00 kc :42.00 5 :O.O1OO PEAK RATE: 9. 18 cfs VOL: 4 .55 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min TIME DESIGN TIME 0E5I6N TIME 0E5I6H TIME 0E5IGN TIME 0ESI64 TIME DE5ISM RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (nin) (cfs) (no) (cfs) (r.:n) (cfs) (nin) (cfs) (ntn) (cfs) (nin) (cfs) 10 350 2.0494 690 2.9524 1030 1.8615 1370 1.7211 1710 0.000E 20 360 2.1640 700 2.9158 1040 1.8113 1380 1.7226 1720 0.0004 30 370 2.2547 710 2.8910 1050 1.7748 1390 1.7241 1730 0.0003 40 380 2.3271 720 2.8751 1060 1.7483 1400 1.7256 1740 0.0002 50 390 2.3859 733 2.9655 1070 1.7293 1410 1.7271 1750 0.0002 60 0.0034 400 2.4379 746 2.8606 1080 1.7157 1420 1.7286 1760 0.0001 70 0.0202 410 2.6328 750 2.8592 1090 1.7062 1430 1.730i 1770 80 0.0532 420 2.9389 760 2.8602 1100 1.6996 1440 1.7315 1780 90 0.0964 430 3.1872 770 2.7844 1110 1.5952 1450 1.5051 1790 100 0.1453 440 3.5744 790 2.6516 1120 1.6925 1460 1.1102 1800 110 0.2100 450 , 4.0706 790 2.5548 1130 1.6909 1470 0.8190 1810 120 0.2882 460 5.1429 800 2.4847 1110 1.6902 1480 0.6041 1820 130 0.3652 470 7.5601 810 2.4343 1150 1.6901 1490 0.4457 1830 140 0.4391 490 9.1477 820 2.3983 1160 1.6906 1500 0.3287 1840 150 0.5090 490 8.7943 830 Z.3729 1170 1.6913 1510 0.2425 1850 160 0.5745 500 7.9375 840 2.3555 1180 1.6923 1520 0.1739 1860 170 0.6577 510 7.1070 850 2.3438 1190 1.6935 1530 0.1320 1870 *-- 180 0.7551 520 6.5059 860 2.3363 1200 1.6948 1540 0.0973 1880 190 0.8414 530 5.5534 870 2.3320 1210 1.6962 1550 0.0718 1890 2O0 0.9191 540 5.1596 880 2.3300 1220 1.6977 1560 0.0530 1900 210 0.9864 550 4.6523 890 2.2921 1230 1.6992 1570 0.0391 1910 220 1.0473 560 4.2E26 903 2.2275 1240 1.7008 1590 0.0292 1920 230 1.1301 570 4.0143 910 2.1808 1250 1.7022 1590 0.0213 1930 240 1.2295 520 3.9207 920 2.1471 1260 1.7039 1600 0.0157 1940 250 1.3134 590 3.6820 930 2.1232 1270 1.7055 1610 0.011E 1950 260 1.3849 600 3.5239 940 2.1063 1280 1.7071 1620 0.0065 1960 270 1.4463 610 3.5156 350 2.0947 1290 1.7087 1630 0.0063 1970 280 1.4994 620 3.4692 960 2.0870 1300 1.7103 1640 0.0046 1980 290 1.5840 630 3.4388 970 2.0821 1310 1.7118 1650 0.0034 1990 300 1.6923 640 3.4202 980 2.0793 1320 1.7134 1660 0.0025 2000 310 1.7802 650 3.3293 990 2.0781 1330 1.7150 1670 0.0019 2010 320 1.8524 660 3.1843 1000 2.0180 1340 1.7165 1680 0.0014 2020 ,.n 11„ ,'n ; 1,1g 1n1n ''"m4f1 1550 1.7151 1590 0.0010 2030 4/12/93 Bush , Roed & Hatchings , I. _ page '7 STORM DRAINAGE PUMPING SYSTEM FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY BRH NO. 90369.04 APRIL 12 , 1993 a a a s a a a a a a a a a a a as s a a a a a=_=a a a a a s a- _:c n a=a.a.a= DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: D1O NAME: DEVELOPED 1OYR , 24HR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 44.00 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2.85 inches AREA. . : 12.50 Acres TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 10.00 min CN 81 .00 TIME OF CONC • 33. 12 min IMPERVIOUS .AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 25.50 Acres CN. . . . : 98.00 PEAK RATE: 15.27 cfs VOL: 7.41 Ac-ft TIME: 420 m:r TIME OESIGN TIME OESIGN TIME OESIGN TIME OESIGN TIME DESIE4 TIME 0ESI6ti RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNGF` (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs' (min. (cfs (mi- refs 10 350 3.3490 690 4.7544 1030 2.94ZE 137E 2.694E 171: 0.00I= 20 360 3.5609 700 4.6913 1090 2.862_ 13E: 2.6 : 172: 0.005-.. 30 370 3.738Z 710 4.6476 1050 2.803E 139: Z.6979 17: 0.0325 90 0.0022 380 3.8891 720 4.6181 1060 2.7606 1432 2.699E 1742 0.0003 50 0.0257 390 4.0194 730 4.5991 1070 2.7293 111 G 2.7013 175' 0.0003 60 0.0832 400 4.1337 740 4.5877 1080 2.707E 1420 2.702E 176: 0.000: 70 0.1638 410 4.4830 750 4.5819 1090 2.6917 143: 2.701E 177: 0.06E 80 0.2563 420 5.0127 760 4.5803 1100 2.680E 1442 2.7062 17E2 0.002' 90 0.3530 430 5.434E 770 4.4560 1110 2.672E 1452 2.36'9 179: 100 0.4494 440 6.0834 780 4.2909 1120 2.667i 14E: 1.7:E: 1 110 0.5717 450 6.9089 790 4.0837 1130 2.6614 197E 1.2'._ 1E1: 120 0.7151 460 8.6881 800 3.9693 1190 2.66:: 11E: 0.914' 1 E2: 130 0.8467 470 12.6822 810 3.8864 1150 2.661E 149E 0.693' 1332 140 0.9663 480 15.2693 820 3.8268 1160 2.661: 154E 0.51:- 150 1.0742 490 14.6325 830 3.7842 1170 2.662: 1;1 0.37E I::: 160 1.1710 S00 13.1739 890 3.7543 1180 2.662E IS:: 0.27.4. 1E:: 170 1.2986 510 11.7676 850 3.7336 1190 2.6639 1530 G.: :: 1675 180 1.4498 5Z0 10.7453 860 3.7198 1200 2.6652 151E 0.132' 133: 190 1.5783 530 9.6467 870 3.7110 1210 2.6667 1555 0.112: 189: 200 1.6879 S40 8.4876 880 3.7058 1220 2.6663 156E 0.0323 19;:0 210 1.7819 550 7.6389 890 3.6438 1230 2.669E 1 E7: 0.CE'l 1910 220 1.8628 560 7.0177 900 3.5396 1240 2.6717 1532 0.04E] 19272 230 1.9804 570 6.5655 910 3.4638 1250 2.6734 1590 0.0 E 133T 240 2.1262 S80 6.2373 920 3.4088 1260 2.675E 1600 0.0.21E 1942 250 2.2432 590 6.0007 930 3.3693 1270 2.677G 161E 0.C1 E' 1 0 260 2.3900 600 5.8313 940 3.3411 1280 2.6787 1620 0.101133 1960 270 2.4203 610.- 5.7115 950 3.3213 1290 2.680E 1632 0.009E 1 280 2.4873 620 5.6281 960 3.3077 1300 2.692E 1 S12 0.22'3 19E: 290 2.6052 630 5.5714 970 3.2986 1310 2.6211 1 E 0.2GE4 1592 300 2.7610 610 5.5341 980 3.2928 1320 2.685E 1642 0.00:5 2G0: 310 2.8869 650 5.3815 990 3.2895 1330 2.687E 1673 0.0079 2212 320 2.9966 660 5.1422 1000 3.2880 1310 2.6891 16E0 0.231 2C20 330 3.0968 670 4.9687 1010 3.2015 1350 2.6911 1690 0.:01: 2035 310 3.1890 680 4.8437 1020 3.0521 1360 2.6928 1700 0.0011 2240 4/12/93 ' Bush , Roed & Hitchings , Inc page 81. STORM DRAINAGE PUMPING SYSTEM FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY BRH NO. 90369.04 APRIL 12 , 1993 xQa=ax=saax3caa=aa-� a x a==a sxa3=aaa=saax a�aa=x DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: D100 NAME: DEVELOPED 100YR , 24HR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 44.00 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3.95 inches AREA. . : 18.50 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 81 .00 TIME OF CONC 33. 12 Min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 25.50 Acres • • CN • 98.00 PEAK RATE: 23.23 cfs VOL: 11 . 10 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min TIME OE5IGH TIME GESIMH TIE . DESIGN TIME 0ESI0H TINE OESISH TINE OESISH RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUHDFF (min) (cfs) (nin) (cfs) (nin) (cfs) (run) (cis) (nin) (cfs) (nis) (cfs) 10 350 5.2971 690 7.0252 1030 4.2845 1370 3.8952 1710 0.0012 20 360 5.6259 700 6.9271 1040 4.1665 1380 3.8969 1720 0.0009 30 0.0042 370 5.8961 710 6.8579 1050 4.0800 1390 3.8986 1730 0.0007 40 0.0478 380 6.1215 720 6.8059 1060 4.0169 1400 3.9003 1740 0.0005 SO 0.1529 390 6.3127 730 6.7775 1070 3.9709 1410 3.9020 1750 0.0001 60 0.2965 400 6.4775 740 6.7566 1080 3.9375 1420 3.9037 1760 0.0003 70 0.4568 410 7.0052 750 6.7440 1090 3.9135 1430 3.9054 1770 0.0002 80 0.6201 420 7.8097 760 6.7375 1100 3.8963 1440 3.9071 1780 0.0001 90 0.7785 430 8.4431 770 6.5514 1110 3.8842 1450 3.3953 1790 0.0001 - 100 0.9276 440 9.4215 780 6.2322 1120 3.8759 1460 2.5046 1800 110 1.1160 450 10.6657 700 5.9991 1130 3.8703 1470 1.8476 1810 120 1.3353 460 13.3534 800 5.8276 1110 3.8667 1480 1.3629 1820 130 1.5278 470 19.37E5 810 5.7032 1150 3.8646 1490 1.0054 1830 140 1.6957 480 23.2337 820 5.6131 1160 3.8636 1500 0.7416 1840 150 1.8419 490 22.2067 230 .5.5482 1170 3.8633 1510 0.5471 1850 160 1.9699 500 19.9526 840 5.5019 1180 3.8637 1520 0.4036 1860 170 2.1435 510 17.7884 850 5.4693 1190 3.8645 1530 0.2977 1870 180 2.3539 520 16.2096 860 5.4462 1200 3.8656 1540 0.2196 1880 190 2.5268 530 14.5269 870 5.4316 1210 3.8670 1550 0.1620 1890 200 2.6697 540 12.7620 880 5.4220 1220 3.8685 1560 0.1195 1900 210 2.7885 550 11.4670 890 5.3292 1230 3.2101 1570 0.0882 1910 220 2.8877 560 10.5181 900 5.1750 1240 3.8718 1580 0.0650 1920 230 3.0421 570 9.8252 910 5.0624 1250 3.3736 1590 0.0480 1930 240 3.2376 580 9.3201 920 4.9803 1260 3.8753 1600 0.0354 1940 250 3.3988 590 8.9537 930 4.9209 1270 3.2772 1610 0.0261 1950 260 3.5426 600 9.6894 940 4.8781 1280 3.8790 1620 0.0193 1960 270 3.6749 610 " 8.5003 952 1.8476 1290 3.8808 1630 0.0142 1970 280 3.7974 620 8.3665 960 4.8261 1300 3.8826 1640 0.0105 1980 290 4.0083 630 9.2734 970 4.8113 1310 3.8844 1650 0.0077 1990 300 4.2871 610 8.2101 980 4.8013 1320 3.8E63 1660 0.0057 2000 310 4.5212 650 7.9762 990 4.7950 1330 3.8881 1670 0.0042 2010 320 4.7209 660 7.6156 1000 9.7913 1340 3.8899 1680 0.0031 2020 330 4.8935 670 7.3529 1010 4.6640 1350 3.9916 1690 0.0023 2030 340 5.0450 680 7.1624 1020 4.4453 1360 3.8934 1700 0.0017 2010 i ' 4/12/93 Bush, Roed & Hitchings , I page q STORM DRAINAGE PUMPING SYSTEM FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY BRH NO. 90369.04 APRIL 12 , 1993 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: D1007 NAME: DEVELOPED 100YR , 7DAY SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 44.00 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC7 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 9.80 inches AREA. . : 18.50 Acres TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 60.00 min CN 91 .00 TIME OF CONC • 33. 12 min IMPERVIOUS .AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 25.50 Acres CN. . . . 98.00 PEAK RATE: 14.29 cfs VOL: 28.98 Ac-ft TIME: 3300 M:n TINE OESINH TINE OESIGN TIME. DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME OESI6N TINE OEUIE). RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RAF!. (nin) (cfs) (nin) (cfs) (nin) (cfs) (nin) (cfs) (nt❑ (cfs' tn:r•• %:fs• zz..n_zca 60 2100 1.9689 4140 2.9133 6180 1.8562 8220 1.392E 10260 C.061 120 2160 2.0070 4200 2.9189 6240 1.8574 8280 '..3339 103ZE 180 0.0174 2220 2.0372 9260 2.9244 6300 1.8585 8340 1.2944 10300 240 0.0925 2280 2.0656 4320 2.9298 6360 1.8597 8400 1.3346 10490 300 0.2009 2340 2.0927 4380 2.9350 6420 1.8608 8460 1.39E3 10500 360 0.2906 2400 2.1185 4410 2.9401 6480 1.8619 8520 1.33 10560 420 0.3636 2460 2.3052 4500 2.9951 6590 1.8630 8580 1.396: 1052E 480 0.4233 2520 2.5025 4560 2.7066 6600 1.8641 8640 1.3966 10685 540 0.4728 2580 2.5407 4620 2.4552 6660 1.8652 8700 1.3270 10740 600 0.5193 2640 2.5697 4680 2.4458 6720 1.866? 87E5 1.3973 10805 660 0.5494 2700 2.5970 9740 2.4483 6780 1.8673 8820 1.2979 10E60 720 0.5793 2760 2.6230 4800 2.4514 6840 1.86E4 885 1.3963 10920 780 0.6846 2820 2.6479 4860 2.4544 6900 1.8694 894 1.3937 109E: 840 0.795? 2880 3.2104 4920 2.4573 6960 1.870' 3000 1.3992 11045 900 0.8292 2940 3.8090 4980 2.4503 7020 1.871= 90E0 ' '9-- 111r:. 960 0.8546 3000 3.8792 5040 2.4631 7080 1.6402 91: !. co: 11165 1020 0.8763 3060 4.5607 5100 2.4659 7140 1.3972 91 e^ 1 40n= 11'220 1080 0.8951 3120 5.2836 5160 2.4687 7200 1.3657 924C 1.4028 1122C • 1140 0.9114 3180 6.4905 5220 2.4714 7260 1.385E 9300 1.40:: 11290 1200 1.0088 3240 9.6310 5280 2.4740 7320 .3861 5360 1.1016 11430 1260 1.1107 3300 19.2898 5340 2.4766 7380 1.386E 9420 1.1022 114E0 1320 1.1301 3360 12.9672 5400 2.1748 7410 1.3871 948C 1.4E_4 115:6 1380 1.1435 3420 7.4619 5460 1.8574 7500 1.3877 . 954E 1.4022 11580 1940 1.1583 3480 5.1801 5520 1.8430 7560 1.3822 9500 1.1021 1164E 1500 1.1813 3540 4.3905 5580 1.8436 7620 1.3897 966E 1.402E 1170E 1560 1.2096 3600 4.3683 5640 1.8449 7680 1.3892 9720 1.4039 11760 1620 1.3430 3660' 4.3839 5700 1.8462 7740 1.389? 978E '..4042 11220 1680 1.4846 3720 3.6701 5760 1.8475 7800 1.3901 9E40 1.4?4- 11820 1710 1.5233 3780 2.9159 5820 1.8488 7860 1.395E 9900 1.403; 11540 1800 1.5550 3840 2.8899 5880 1.8501 7920 1.391! 9960 1.4H4 12000 1860 1.5849 3900 2.8894 5940 1.8513 7980 1.3916 10020 1.46E3 12060 1920 1.6132 3960 2.8955 6000 1.8526 8040 1.392! 10080 1.4261 12120 1980 1.6400 9020 Z.9016 6060 1.8538 8100 1.3925 10140 0.7279 12180 2040 1.7998 9080 2.9075 6120 1.8550 8160 1.3930 10200 0.0365 1229E 4/12/93 Bush , Roed & Hitchings , I.._ page 10 STORM DRAINAGE PUMPING SYSTEM FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY APRIL 12 BRH NO. 90369.04 , 1993 i HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF • Contrib NUM • RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf-AcFt Acres 1 7.796 480 176115 cf 43.70 E . 2/24 2 13.929 480 298801 cf 43.70 Ex. so/-2.4 3 21 .992 480 457953 cf 43.•70 EX. Ioo/24 4 13.906 3300 1 2121 81 cf 43.70 Ex • loo .iy 5 9. 148 480 • 198143 cf 44.00 00. 2/24- 6 15.269 -490 322959 cf 44.00 Deg• 10/1-4- 7 23.234 480 493550 cf 44.00 vex, too 8 14.290 3300 1252332 cf 44.00 tie✓• IJ=' _r • 13 0. 175 1560 17198 cf 43.70 1✓x- loo/zG c`J_ So LM P 14 2.425 5400 795053 cf 43.70 Ex. ioo •ter. 10 cMP 15 1 .71 4 1 450 10247 c f 44 .00 D2•/, 2/'24 0•.� F��^-F 16 2.330 780 135063 cf 44.00 V,2,/. to/24- n-J- �.�...F • 17 2.330 570 295653 cf 44.00 De,/. I oo/z 4. oar 18 2.330 2880 1075748 c f 44.00 ;fie I, C.^ �►n•� o.�'`' ���^-F • , I 4/12/93 Bush , Roed & Hitchings , Inc - • page ►1n STORM DRAINAGE PUMPING SYSTEM FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY BRH NO. 90369.04 APRIL 12 , 1993 xxx�xxe:sa=m=a=z a�mazz zza�sazaas xmex oz:z:=�=3zzxxaz:xe:=az:ac--x----e. STAGE STORAGE TABLE CUSTOM STORAGE ID No. XPOND • Description: EXISTING WETLANDS POND STAGE (--STORAGE---) STAGE (---STORAGE-) STAGE (----STORAGE----) STAGE (ft) -flc-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- -Arft- (ft) -cf- --He-ft- (ft) -ef--- --fr_-fi- eeeaz:zzazazzzozz:rcsac:zzer-ara>:ccse[rsa> =z:a=.azaazazees a ezz.�zzc:_..==zezzzz_ 10.00 0.0000 0.0000 12.00 244606 5.6151 14.00 748419 17.181 16.00 1391356 31.941 10.10 0.0000 0.0000 12.10 268109 6.1548 14.10 778634 17.875 16.10 1430232 32.23S . 10.20 0.0000 0.0000 12.20 291601 6.6942 14.20 808849 18.569 15.20 115977E 31.723 10.30 0.0000 0.0000 12.30 315099 .7.2337 14.30 839064 19.262 16.30 1508164 34.623 10.40 0.0000 0.0000 12.40 338596 7.7731 14.40 869279 19.955 16.10 1547106 35.51- 10.50 0.0000 0.0000 12.50 362094 8.3125 14.50 899494 20.6E0 16.56 l�noc_6 35.41: 10.60 8911 0.2046 12.60 385591 8.8520 14.60 929709 21.343 16.50 1524972 37.364 10.70 17828 0.4093 12.70 409089 9.3914' 14.70 959924 22.037 16.73 1663902 35.19: 10.80 26711 0.6139 12.80 432586 9.9308 14.80 990139 22.730 16.80 1702244 33.092 10.90 35655 0.8185 12.90 456084 10.470 14.90 1020354 23.12i 15.93 17417E 32.951 11.00 44569 1.0232 13.00 479581 11.010 15.00 1050E69 24.118 17.00 1780716 19.8e2 11.10 64573 1.4824 13.10 506465 11.62? 15.10 1084648 24.900 17.10 182451 S 41.223 11.20 84576 1.9416 13.20 533349 12.241 15.20 1118726 25.662 17.20 1868313 4-.29' 11.30 104580 2.4008 13.30 560233 12.861 15.30 1152805 26.465 17.30 191211: 43.2i., 11.40 124584 2.8600 13.40 587116 13.478 15.10 1186884 27.247 17.10 1955910 44.922 11.50 . 144588 3.3193 13.50 614000 14.0% 15.50 1220963 28.029 17.50 1999709 4:.i:- 11.60 164591 3.7785 13.60 640884 14.713 15.60 1255041 28.912 17.60 2043SG7 11.70 184595 4.2377 13.70 667768 15.330 ' 15.70 1289120 25.r4 - 17.7 28873 4 1?.9! 11.80 204599 4.6969 13.80 694651 15.947 15.80 1323199 30.3;a 17.90 7.131164 42.92 11.90 224603 5.1562 13.90 721535 16.564 15.90 135727E 3i.lS= 17.90 2174923 • 4/12/93 Bush , Roed & Hitchings , Ih pagej244 STORM DRAINAGE PUMPINGG SYSTEM FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY BRH NO. 90369.04 APRIL 12 , 1993 STAGE STORAGE TABLE CUSTOM STORAGE ID No . °POND Description: DEVELOPED WETLANDS POND • STAGE (----STORAGE---) STAGE (----STORAGE----) STAGE (---STORASE----) STAGE (--STORAGE----) (ft) ---cf- -Ac-Ft- (ft) -cf- --Rc-Ft- (ft) --cf--- --Rc-Ft- (ft) --cf- -Ac-ft- II=S-- -------5-- 5----IICS3�--S S-II--------3 S-S---<3--===----_--- 10.00 0.0000 0.0000 19.00 661694 15.190 18.00 2170619 19.831 22.00 4943919 113.50 10.10 0.0000 0.0000 11.10 685833 15.745 18.10 2239941 51.1222 Z2.10 5013251 115.09 10.20 0.0000 0.0000 14.20 709971 16.299 18.20 2309284 53.014 22.20 5082584 116.68 10.30 0.0000 0.0000 14.30 734111 16.853 18.30 2378616 54.606 22.30 5151916 118.27 10.40 0.0000 0.0000 14.40 758249 17.407 18.40 2417949 56.197 22.40 5221249 119.86 10.50 0.0000 0.0000 14.50 782382 17.961 18.50 2517281 57.789- 22.50 5290581 121.46 10.60 8614 0.1977 14.60 806526 18.515 18.60 2586614 59.310 22.60 5359914 123.05 10.70 17228 0.3955 14.70 830665 19.069 18.70 26E5946 60.972 22.70 5429246 124.64 10.80 25841 0.5932 14.80 854804 19.624 18.80 2725279 62.561 22.80 5198579 126.23 10.90 34455 0.7910 14.90 878943 20.178 18.90 2794611 61.155 Z2.90 5567911 127.82 11.00 43069 0.988? 15.00 903081 20.732 19.00 2863944 65.747 23.00 5637214 129.41 11.10 61878 1.1205 15.10 929796 21.345 19.10 2933276 67.339 23.10 5706576 131.00 11.20 80686 1.8523 15.20 956511 21.958 19.20 3002609 68.930 23.20 5775909 132.60 11.30 99495 2.2841 15.30 983226 22.572 19.30 3071941 70.522 23.30 5815241 134.19 11.40 118304 2.7159 15.40 1009941 23.185 19.40 3141274 72.114 23.40 5914574 135.78 11.50 137113 3.1477 15.50 1036556 23.798 19.50 3210606 73.705 23.50 5983906 137.37 11.60 155921 3.5795 15.60 1063371 24.412 19.60 3279939 75.297 23.60 607079 138.96 11.70 171730 4.0112 15.70 1090086 25.025 19.70 3319271 76.889 23.70 6122571 140.55 11.80 193539 4.4430 15.90 1116801 25.638 19.80 3418604 78.480 23.80 6191904 142.15 11.90 212348 4.8748 15.90 11133516 26.252 19.90 3487936 80.072 23.90 6261236 143.74 12.00 231156 5.3066 16.00 1170231 26.865 20.00 35557269 81.664 24.00 63330569 145.33 12.10 251931 5.7836 16.10 1200938 27.570 20.10 3626601 83.255 24.10 6399901 146.92 L 12.20 272711 6.2606 16.20 1231641 28.275 20.20 3695934 84.81? 21.20 6461234 148.51 12.30 293489 6.7376 16.30 126Z350 28.980 20.30 3765266 86.439 Z4.30 6538566 150.10 12.40 314266 7.2146 16.40 1293056 29.684 20.40 3834599 88.030 24.40 6607899 151.70 12.50 335044 7.6915 16.50 1323763 30.389 20.50 3903931 89.622 24.50 6677231 153.29 12.60 355821 8.1685 16.60 1354469 31.094 20.60 3973264 91.214 24.60 6746564 154.88 12.70 376599 8.6455 16.70 1385175 31.799 20.70 4042596 92.805 24.70 6815896 156.17 12.80 397376 9.1225 16.80 1415881 32.504 20.80 1111970 94.397 24.80 6885229 158.06 12.90 418154 9.5995 16.90 1446588 33.209 20.90 4181261 95.989 24.90 6954561 159.65 13.00 438931 10.076 17.00 1477294 33.914 21.00 4250594 97.580 25.00 7023894 161.25 13.10 461208 10.588 17.10 1516626 35.506 21.10 4319926 99.172 25.10 7093226 162.84 13.20 483484 11.099 17.20 1615959 37.097 21.20 4389259 100.76 25.20 71625E9 164.43 13.30 505760 11.611 17.30 1685791 38.689 21.30 4458591 102.36 25.30 7231E91 166.02. 13.90 528036 12.122 17.40 1754624 40.281 21.40 4527924 103.95 25.40 7301221 167.61 13.50 550313 12.633 17.50 1823956 41.872 21.50 4597256 105.54 25.50 7370556 169.20 13.60 572589 13.145 17.60 1893289 93.464 21.60 1666589 107.13 25.60 7439989 170.80 13.70 594865 13.656 17.70 1962621 45.056 21.70 4735921 109.72 25.70 7509221 172.39 13.80 617141 14.168 17.80 2031954 46.6177 21.80 1805254 110.31 25.80 757855i 173.98 13.90 639418 14.679 17.90 2101286 48.239 21.90 1874586 111.91 25.90 7647886 175.57 I 4/12/93 Bush , Road & Hitchings , I.._ ' page 15 STORM DRAINAGE PUMPING SYSTEM FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY i BRH NO. 90369.04 APRIL 12 , 1933 ==.aa=aaac=aaa==as=a.a=aaa==a==a=a==a=aazv===a==a= == STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE 1 ' DISCHARGE LIST ID No. PUMP Description: WETLANDS OVERFLOW PUMP -- -- - - SIRE ( DISCHARBf > STfl6E (--OISCHflR6E -> SIRE (- OISCHARBE--> SUE (- DISCHflREE--) (ft) -cfs- (ft) --cfs- (ft) -cfs-- ---- (ft) -cfs-- - vaesazaaa_uaassz�-aeaawesas asscr_zsa:nasr_a�aerazo__ccrs=a::e=:seat:�erssizzzai:�zzz�c=c 10.00 0.0000 10.40 0.0000 10.80 0.0000 11.20 0.0000 10.01 0.0000 10.41 0.0000 10.81 0.0000 11.21 0.0000 . 1 10.02 0.0000 10.42 0.0000 10.82 0.0000 11.22 0.0000 10.03 0.0000 10.43 0.0000 10.83 0.0000 11.23 0.0000 10.0i 0.0000 10.44 0.0000 10.81 0.0000 11.24 0.0000 10.05 0.0000 10.45 0.0000 10.85 0.0000 11.25 0.0000 10.06 0.0000 10.46 0.0000 10.86 0.0000 11.2E 0.0006 . 10.07 0.0000 10.47 0.0000 10.87 0.0000 11.27 0.0000 10.08 0.0000 10.48 0.0000 . 10.88 0.0000 11.26 0.0000 _ ' 10.09 0.0000 10.49 0.0000 10.89 0.0000 11.29 0.0000 10,10 0.0000 10.50 0.0000 10.90 0.0000 11.30 0.0000 10.11 0.0000 10.51 0.0000 10.91 0.0000 11.3! 0.0000 10.12 0.0000 10.52 0.0000 10.92 0.0000 11.32 0.0000 .. 10.13 0.0000 10.53 0.0000 10.93 0.0000 11.33 0.0000 10.14 0.0000 10.54 0.0000 10.94 0.0000 11.34 0.0000 10.15 0.0000 10.55 0.0000 10.95 0.0000 11.35 0.0000 10.16 0.0000 10.56 0.0000 10.96 0.0000 11.3E 0.000C 10.17 0.0000 10.57 0.0000 10.97 0.0000 11.37 0.0005 ' 10.18 0.0000 10.58 0.0000 10.98 0.0000 11.36 0.0000 10.19 0.0000 10.59 0.0000 10.99 0.0000 1!.3= 0.0000 10.20 0.0000 10.60 0.0000 11.00 0.0000 11.4e 0.000G 10.21 0.0000 10.61 0.0000 11.01 0.0000 11.4: 0.0000 ' 10.22 0.0000 10.62 0.0000 11.02 0.0000 11.42 0.0000 10.23 0.0000 10.63 0.0000 11.03 0.0000 11.43 0.0000 10.24 0.0000 10.64 0.0000 11.09 0.0000 11.44 0.0000 . 10.25 0.0000 10.65 0.0000 11.05 0.0000 11.45 0.0000 10.26 0.0000 10.66 0.0000 11.06 0.0000 11.16 0.0000 10.27 0.0000 10.67 0.0000 11.07 0.0000 11.47 0.0000 10.2E 0.0000 10.68 0.0000 11.08 0.0000 11.42 0.0000 • 10.29 0.0000 10.69 0.0000 11.09 0.0000 11.49 0.0009 10.30 0.0000 10.70 0.0000 11.10 0.0000 11.50 0.0000 10.31 0.0000 10.71 0.0000 11.11 0.0000 - 11.51 0.0000 10.32 0.0000 10.72 0.0000 11.12 0.0000 11.52 0.0000 10.33 0.0000 , 10.73 0.0000 11.13 0.0000 11.53 0.0000 10.34 0.0000 10.74 0.0000 11.14 0.0000 11.54 0.0000 i 10.35 0.0000 10.75 0.0000 11.15 0.0000 11.55 0.0000 10.36 0.0000 10.76 0.0000 11.16 0.0000 11.5E 0.0000 ' 10.37 0.0000 10.77 0.0000 11.17 0.0000 11.57 0.0000 10.3E 0.0000 10.78 0.0000 11.18 0.0000 11.58 0.0000 10.39 0.0000 10.79 0,0000 11.19 0.0000 11.59 0.0000 4/12/93 Bush , Roed & Hitchings , I,,., page 16 STORM DRAINAGE PUMPING SYSTEM FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY BRH NO. 90369.04 APRIL 12 , 1993 ====.===.=========vas======.=a-= n.....-...===................m a==Za=== STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE I SIA6E (--OISCHARGE---) STAGE (--DISCHARGE---) STAGE (--DISCHARGE--) STAGE (--DISCHARGE-) (ft) -cfs-- - (ft) ---cfs-- (ft) -cfs-- -- (ft) -cfs- - _- i3ii3ti3i@iiiiLLSf2--i32-i-II-33-LSiiLiii3i---ii.3a3-i-33-ZZS033H3IIi3Yi�i--3-3i3iCiilffipi13ii9R 11.60 0.0000 12.01 2.3300 12.48 2.3300 1 Z.92 2.3300 11.61 0.0000 12.05 2.3300 12.19 2.3300 1 Z.93 2.3300 11.62 0.0000 12.06 Z.3300 12.50 Z.3300 12.94 2.3300 11.63 0.0000 12.07 2.3300 12.51 2.3300 12.95 2.3300 11.64 0.0000 12.08 2.3300 12.52 2.3300 12.96 2.3300 11.65 0.0000 12.09 2.3300 12.53 2.3300 1 Z.97 2.3300 11.66 0.0000 12.10 2.3300 12.54 2.3300 1 2.98 2.3300 11.67 0.0000 12.11 2.3300. 12.55 2.3300 12.99 2.3300 11.68 0.0000 12.12 2.3300 12.56 2.3300 13.00 Z.3300 11.69 0.0000 12.13 Z.3300 12.57 2.3300 13.01 2.3300 11.70 0.0000 12.14 2.3300 12.58 2.3300 13.02 2.3300 11.71 0.0000 12.15 2.3300 12.59 2.3300 13.03 2.3300 11.72 0.0000 12.16 2.3300 12.60 2.3300 13.01 2.3300 11.73 0.0000 12.17 2.3300 12.61 2.3300 13,05 2.3300 11.74 0.0000 12.18 2.3300 12.62 2.3300 13.06 2.3300 11.75 0.0000 12.19 2.3300 12.63 2.3300 13.07 2.3300 11.76 0.0000 12.20 2.3300 12.69 2.3300 13.08 2.3300 11.77 0.0000 12.21 2.3300 12.65 Z.3300 13.09 2.3300 - ' .> 11.78 2.3300 12.22 2.3300 12.66 2.3300 13.10 2.3300 7 ,41 -J� 11.79 2.3300 12.23 2.3300 12.67 2.3300 13.11 2.3300 _ Ur Qr 11.80 2.3300 12.24 2.3300 12.68 2.3300 13.12 2.3300 11.81 2.3300 12.25 2.3300 12.69 2.3300 13.13 2.3300 11.82 2.3300 12.26 2.3300 12.70 2.3300 13.11 2.3300 ' 11.83 2.3300 12.27 2.3300 12.71 2.3300 13.15 2.3300 11.84 2.3300 12.28 2.3300 12.72 2.3300 13.16 2.3300 11.85 2.3300 12.29 2.3300 12.73 2.3300 13.17 2.3300 11.86 2.3300 12.30 2.3300 12.74 2.3300 13.18 2.3300 11.87 2.3300 12.31 2.3300 12.75 Z.3300 13.19 Z.3300 ' 11.88 2.3300 12.32 2.3300 12.76 2.3300 13.20 2.3300 11.89 2.3300 12.33 2.3300 12.77 2.3300 13.21 2.3300 11.90 2.3300 12.34 2.3300 12.78 2.3300 13.72 2.3300 11.91 Z.3300 12.35 2.3300 12.79 2.3300 13.23 2.3300 11.92 2.3300 12.36 2.3300 12.80 2.3300 13.21 2.3300 11.93 2.3300 12.37 2.3300 12.81 2.3300 13.25 2.3300 11.94 2.3300 12.38 2.3300 12.82 2.3300 13.26 2.3300 1 11.95 2.3300 12.39 2.3300 12.83 2.3300 c 13.27 2.3300 1 _ 11.96 2.3300 12.10 2.3300 12.81 2.3300 13.28 Z.3300 11.97 2.3300 12.11 2.3300 12.85 2.3300 13.29 2.3300 ' 11.98 2.3300 12.12 2.3300 12.86 2.3300 13.30 2.3300 11.99 2.3300 12.13 2.3300 12.87 2.3300 13.31 2.3300 12.00 2.3300 12.44 2.3300 12.88 2.3300 13.32 2.3300 12.01 2.3300 12.45 2.3300 12.89 2.3300 13.33 2.3300 12.02 2.3300 12.16 2.3300 12.90 Z.3300 13.34 2.3300 12.03 2.3300 12.17 2.3300 12.91 2.3300 13.35 2.3300 4/12/93 Bush , Roed & Hitchings , I _ . page 17 1 STORM DRAINAGE PUMPING SYSTEM FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY BRH NO. 90369.04 APRIL 12 , 1993 STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE STAGE (-DISCHARGE---) STAGE (-0ISCHARGE--) STAGE (-DISCHARGE---) STAGE (--DISCHARGE---) (ft) -cfs- (ft) -cfs- - (ft) -cfs- -- (ft) --cfs- - 13.36 2.330D 13.80 2.3300 19.24 2.3300 14.68 2.3300 13.37 2.3300 13.81 2.3300 11.25 2.3300 11.69 2.3300 13.38 2.3300 13.82 2.3300 14.26 2.3300 11.70 2.3300 13.39 2.3308 13.83 2.3300 14.27 2.3300 11.71 2.3300 13.40 2.3300 13.84 2.3300 19.28 2.3300 11.72 2.3300 13.41 2.3300 13.85 2.3300 11.29 2.3300 14.73 2.3300 13.42 2.3300 13.86 2.3300 14.30 2.3300 14.71 2.3300 13.43 2.3300 13.87 2.3300 14.31 2.3300 11.75 2.3300 1 13.11 2.3300 13.88 2.3300 14.32 2.3300 11.79 2.3300 13.45 2.3300 13.89 Z.3300 14.33 2.3300 1 s.77 2.3300 13.46 2.3300 13.90 2.3300 14.34 Z.3300 19.7E 2.3300 1 13.47 2.3300 13.91 2.3300 14.35 Z.3300 11.79 2.3300 . 13.48 2.3300 13.92 2.3300 14.36 2.3300 11.80 2.3300 13.49 2.3300 13.93 2.33011 11.37 2.3300 14.£; 2.3300 13.50 2.3300 13.94 2.3300 14.38 2.3300 14.82 2.3300 13.51 2.3300 13.95 2.3300 14.39 Z.3300 11.63 2.3300 13.52 2.3300 13.96 2.3300 14.40 2.3300 14.84 2.3300 13.53 2.3300 13.97 2.3300 14.41 2.3300 14.8E 2.3300 ' 13.51 2.3300 13.98 2.3300 14.42 2.3300 14.8i 2.3300 13.55 2.3300 13.99 2.3300 14.43 2.3300 11.87 2.3300 13.56 Z.3300 14.00 2.3300 14.44 2.3300 14.9E 2.3300 13.57 2.3300 14.01 2.3300 14.45 2.3300 14.E9 2.3300 13.58 2.3300 14.02 2.3300 14.46 2.3300 14.9 2.3300 13.59 2.3300 14.03 2.3300 14.47 2.3300 14.91 2.3302 13.60 2.3300 14.01 2.3300 11.48 2.3300 14.9_ 2.3300 13.61 2.3300 11.05 2.3300 11.19 2.3300 11.93 2.3300 13.62 2.330D 14.06 2.3300 14.58 2.3300 11.9' 2.3302 13.63 2.3300 14.07 2.3300 14.51 Z.3300 14.95 2.330E 13.61 2.3300 11.08 Z.3300 14.52 2.3300 14.93 2.3300 13.65 2.3300 14.09 2.3300 19.53 2.3300 14.97 2.3300 13.66 2.3300 14.10 2.3300 11.51 Z.3300 14.92 2.3300 13.67 2.3300 11.11 2.3300 14.55 2.3300 14.99 2.3300 13.68 2.330D 11.12 2.3300 19.56 2.3300 1 E.CZ Z.3300 13.69 2.3300 11.13 2.3300 11.57 2.3300 15.01 2.3300 13.70 2.3300 14.14 2.3300 11.58 2.3300 15.02 2.3300 13.71 2.3300 14.15 2.3300 14.59 Z.3300 15.03 2.3300 13.72 2.3300 14.16 Z.3300 14.60 2.3300 15.01 Z.3300 13.73 2.3300 11.17 2.3300 11.61 2.3300 15.0E 2.3300 13.74 2.3300 14.18 2.3300 14.62 2.3300 15.0a 2.3300 13.75 2.3300 19.19 2.3300 14.63 2.3300 15.07 2.3300 13.76 2.3300 11.20 2.330(1 11.61 2.3300 15.02 2.3300 13.77 2.3300 11.Z1 2.3300 11.65 2.3300 15.03 2.3300 13.73 2.3300 11.22 2.3300 14.66 2.3300 15.10 2.3300 13.79 2.3300 11.23 2.3300 11.67 2.3300 15.11 2.3300 4/12/93 Bush , Roed & Hitchings , I..,. page 18 STORM DRAINAGE PUMPING SYSTEM FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY BRH NO. 90369.04 APRIL 12 , 1993 =========s=====Umas-Una=m tae=aa=== STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE STAGE (--OISCHAR6E--) STAGE (--OISCHARGE---) STAGE (--OISCHHRGE--) STAGE (-OISCHARSE--) (ft) -cfs- -- (ft) ---cfs- ---- (ft) --cfs- (ft) --cfs- -- MiLi------ia8asi3.ai.Raaia Si CiLifO,,M.=isasie33.=s-====i==aie=i�3aelr-Zeastmaseeielie ummaer. 15.12 2.3300 15.56 2.3300 16.00 2.3300 16.44 2.3300 15.13 2.3300 15.57 2.3300 16.01 2.3300 16.45 2.3300 15.14 2.3300 15.58 2.3300 16.02 2.3300 16.46 2.3300 j 15.15 2.3300 15.59 2.3300 16.03 2.3300 16.47 2.3300 15.16 2.3300 15.60 2.3300 16.04 2.3300 16.48 2.3300 . 15.17 2.3300 15.61 2.3300 16.05 2.3300 16.49 2.3300 15.18 2.3300 15.62 2.3300 16.06 Z.3300 16.50 2.3300 15.19 2.3300 15.63 2.3300 16.07 2.3300 16.5! 2.3300 • 15.20 2.3300 15.61 2.3300 16.08 2.3300 16.52 2.3300 15.21 2.3300 15.65 2.3300 16.09 2.3300 16.53 2.3300 15.22 2.3300 15.66 2.3300 16.10 2.3300 16.51 2.3300 • 15.23 2.3300 15.67 2.3300 16.11 2.3300 16.S5 2.3300 15.21 2.3300 15.68 2.3300 '16.12 2.3300 16.56 2.3300 15.25 2.3300 15.69 2.3300 16.13 2.3300 16.57 2.3300 15.26 2.3300 15.70 2.3300 16.14 2.3300 16.58 2.3300 15.27 2.3300 15.71 2.3300 16.15 2.3300 16.59 2.3300 • 15.28 2.3300 15.72 2.3300 16.16 2.3300 16.60 2.3300 15.29 2.3300 15.73 2.3300 16.17 2.3300 16.61 2.3300 15.30 2.3300 15.74 2.3300 16.18 2.3300 16.62 2.3300 15.31 2.3300 15.75 2.3300 16.19 2.3300 16.63 2.3300 15.32 2.3300 15.76 2.3300 16.20 2.3300 16.61 2.3300 15.33 2.3300 15.77 2.3300 16.21 2.3300 16.65 2.3300 15.34 2.3300 15.78 2.3300 16.22 2.3300.. 16.66 2.3300 15.35 2.3300 15.79 2.3300 16.23 2.3300 16.67 2.3300 15.36 2.3300 15.80 2.3300 16.29 2.3300 16.68 2.3300 15.37 2.3300 15.81 2.3300 16.25 2.3300 16.69 2.3300 15.38 2.3300 15.82 2.3300 16.26 2.3300 16.70 2.3300 15.39 2.3300 15.83 2.3300 16.27 2.3300 16.71 2.3300 i 15.90 2.3300 15.81 2.3300 16.28 2.3300 16.72 2.3300 15.41 2.3300 15.85 2.3300 16.29 2.3300 16.73 2.3300 15.42 2.3300 15.86 2.3300 16.30 2.3300 16.74 2.3300 15.43 Z.3300 15.87 2.3300 16.31 2.3300 16.75 2.3300 15.44 2.3300 15.83 2.3300 16.32 2.3300 16.76 2.3300 1 15.15 2.3300 15.89 2.3300 16.33 2.3300 16.77 2.3300 15.46 2.3300 15.90 2.3300 16.34 2.3300 16.78 2.3300 i ; 15.47 2.3300 15.91 2.3300 16.35 2.3300 16.79 2.3300 __! 15.48 2.3300 15.92 2.3300 16.36 2.3300 16.80 2.3300 15.99 2.3300 15.93 2.3300 16.37 2.3300 16.81 2.3300 15.50 2.3300 15.99 2.3300 16.38 2.3300 16.82 2.3300 15.51 2.3300 15.95 2.3300 16.39 2.3300 16.83 2.3300 15.52 2.3300 15.96 2.3300 16.40 2.3300 16.84 2.3300 15.53 2.3300 15.97 2.3300 16.41 Z.3300 16.85 2.3300 15.51 2.3300 15.98 2.3300 16.12 2.3300 16.86 2.3300 15.55 2.3300 15.99 2.3300 16.93 2.3300 16.8? 2.3300 4/12/93 Bush , Rod & Hitchings , In_ page 19 1 STORM DRAINAGE PUMPING SYSTEM FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY BRH NO. 90369.04 APRIL 12 , 1993 a=s=tea=-a==a==a saa n aa=®a==a as s=a=a===sac== ===---= STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE STR6E (-0ISCHRR6E--) SSE (-OISCHRR6E-) STR6E (-0IS131RR6E---) SIRE (-OISCHRRSE--) (ft) -cfs- (ft) --cfs- (ft) -cfs- (ft) -cfs- 16.88 Z.3300 17.17 Z.3300 17.46 2.3300 17.75 2.3300 16.89 2.3300 17.18 2.3300 17.47 2.3300 17.76 2.3300 16.90 Z.3300 17.19 2.3300 17.48 2.3300 17.77 2.3300 16.91 2.3300 17.20 2.3300 17.49 2.3300 17.78 2.3300 16.9Z 2.3300 17.21 2.3300 17.50 2.3300 17.79 2.3300 16.93 2.3300 17.22 2.3300 17.51 2.3300 17.80 2.3300 16.91 Z.3300 17.23 2.3300 17.52 2.3300 17.81 2.3300 16.95 2.3300 17.21 2.3300. 17.53 2.3300 17.82 2.3300 16.96 2.3300 17.25 2.3300 17.54 2.3300 17.83 2.3300 1 16.97 2.3300 17.26 2.3300 17.55 2.3308 17.81 2.3300 . 16.98 2.3300 17.27 2.3300 17.56 2.3300 17.85 2.3300 16.99 2.3300 17.28 2.3300 17.57 2.3300 17.86 2.3300 17.00 2.3300 17.29 2.33(10 17.58 2.3300 17.87 2.3300 17.01 2.3300 17.30 2.3300 _ 17.59 2.3300 17.88 2.3300 17.02 2.3300 17.31 2.3300 17.60 2.3300 17.89 2.3300 17.03 Z.3300 17.32 2.3300 17.61 2.3300 17.98 2.3300 17.04 Z.3300 17.33 2.3300 17.62 2.3300 17.91 2.3300 17.05 2.3300 17.31 2.3300 17.63 2.3300 17.92 2.3300 17.06 Z.3300 17.35 2.3300 17.64 2.3300 17.93 2.3300 17.07 2.3300 17.36 2.3300 17.65 Z.3300 17.94 2.3300 17.08 2.3300 17.37 2.3300 17.66 2.3300 17.95 2.3300 1?.09 2.3300 17.38 2.3300 17.67 2.3300 17.96 2.3300 17.10 2.3300 17.39 2.3300 17.68 2.3300 17.97 Z.3300 17.11 2.3300 17.40 2.3300 17.69 2.3300 17.96 2.3300 17.12 2.3300 17.11 . 2.3300 17.70 2.3300 17.99 2.3300 17.13 2.3300 17.42 Z.3300 17.71 2.3300 18.00 2.3300 17.14 2.3300 17.43 2.3300 17.72 2.3300 18.00 2.3300 17.15 2.3300 17.44 2.3300 17.73 2.3300 17.16 2.3300 17.15 2.3300 17.74 2.3300 1 1 4/12/93 Bush , Roed & Hitchings , I.;. page 20 STORM DRAINAGE PUMPING SYSTEM FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY BRH NO. 90369.04 APRIL 12 , 1993 STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE BROAD CRESTED WEIR ID No. ROAD Description: OAKESDALE AVE. S.W. cd: 3.0300 Weir length: 50.0000 ft . El: 20.00 ft. Weir Increm: 0. 10 STAGE (—OISCHAR6E---) STAGE (--OISCAAR6E—) STAGE (—OISCHflR6E—) STAGE. (—DISCHARGE—) (ft) —cfs— ---- (ft) —cfs—-- (ft) —cfs-- (ft) —cfs— ersmssassaszzssazasaszazszzasszsamara:zzzz_zzxxzcar--saxurnms=osxzsxzzsseezzvasas:mzssaszzzzmsaz 20.00 0.0000 20.30 24.894 20.60 70.411 20.90 129.35 20.10 4.7909 20.40 38.327 20.70 88.728 21.00 151.50 20.20 13.551 20.50 53.563. 20.80 108.40 4/12/93 Bush , Roed & Hitchings , ?^-- page 21 STORM DRAINAGE PUMPING S` .rt FOR: BRUCE BLUME COMPANY BRH NO. 90369.04 APRIL 12 , 1993 LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INfL J -STO- -0I5- (-PEAK-) 5101iASE ( DESCRIPTIO11--) (cfs) (cfs) -id- -id- (-STAGE) id VOL (cf) EXISTING ZYR 0.00 7.80 XPO$0 3001P 11.66 11 176115 EXISTING 10YR 0.00 13.9311P0110 3001? 12.23 12 298801 nl ap a t.{.e a P EXISTING 100YR 0.00 Z1.99 WOE 30Ct1P 12.89 13 451119 EXISTING 100YR 7DAY 0.00 13.91 XPOND 3001P 13.29 14 558767 DEVELOPED ZYR 0.00 9.15 DPONO PUMP 11.78 15 189280 DEVELOPED 10YR 0.00 15.17 OPOND PUMP 11.91 16 20384 (a-1-e of 2. 3 c-f5 DEVELOPED 100YR 0.00 23.23 OPONO PUMP 12.58 17 350655 DEVELOPED 100YR7DAY 0.00 14.29 OPOND PUMP 13.00 18 438867 EXISTING 100YR 70AY 0.00 13.91 XPOND ROAD 15.47 19 1212181 DEVELOPED 100YR7DAY 0.00 11.Z9 OPOND ROAD 16.30 ZO 1262332 S 'CLIP 41'-`3? °�o J 2�-�( o�..� (0_1 a . C Z "- 1 -c-or r 2a k 0`' �" } Fake / File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool • Bush, Road & Hitchings, Inc 2MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMB 3MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM8 3 ROUTING COMPARISON TABLE 3 ' 3 MATCH INFLOW STO DIS PEAK PEAK OUT 3 3 DESCRIPTION PEAK PEAK No. No. ST6 OUT HYD 3 3 3 3EXISTIN6 2YR 0.00 7.80 XPOND 30CMP 11 .66 0.00 11 3 3EXISTIN6 10YR 0.00 13.93 XPOND 30CMP 12.23 0.00 12 3 3EXISTIN6 100YR 0.00 21 .99 XPOND 30CMP 12.89 0. 17 13 3 3EXISTIN6 100YR 7DAY 0.00 13.91 XPOND 30CMP 13.29 2.43 14 3 3DEVELOPED 2YR 0.00 9. 15 DPOND PUMP 11 .78 1 .71 15 3 3DEVELOPED 10YR 0.00 15.27 DPOND PUMP 11 .94 2.33 16 3 3DEVELOPED 100YR 0.00 23.23 DPOND PUMP 12.58 2.33 17 3 3DEVELOPED 100YR7DAY 0.00 14.29 DPOND PUMP 13.00 2.33 18 3 3EXISTIN6 100YR 7DAY 0.00 13.91 XPOND ROAD 15.47 0.00 19 3 3DEVELOPED 100YR7DAY 0.00 14.29 (POND ROAD 16.30 0.00 20 3 3 3 3 ==>Done< Press any key to exit • 3 TMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM1MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM> 4:IaP gaffe �1oSg coal aS OJ )0 ' Available Memory remaining: 137008 bytes Current Data Set Name: d: \works\ja1\90369-04 • • • • I , /za �z/zx 0i O 1 �c C- ?L ool ^- col a - b'll �L•11 L. 00 �q'ii I �� K 8'11 oo's 1 gS WI'�1 L MYa1 a) ram' ��v'i ool)c 'DS0 11a� S� c_.1 oc 1 J cv, -:ZI-. -0 d�1 o cx..'q1 O"Z, �Z 5 L --I ci G i • i -- — • - =- -MAY_"- 19 9._I_,_, i i ' ,. 1 • I • . C.(LEGt.1 . 1z I \/ ER :. c. go � 43 • '56G 'I.. Ien, 0AL 6A. I- LuI._ A-r I vt.1z, • 1_4:7 4-T I o►J ; F E 1✓i A ; MAP c R c7,4 ; e CT%c r i ''V ' : •. • mil t.- : ►1:1: IP" . . IJ A4 R- OFJJEE' ' .• B►-A c & R 1 vI R • ' ii .i ' II � tp •. i , • I ! • • ; i ! i ' I • , - H. ► o EL , ►q,4 I,-, I4-, , I2I c ` 9IC c s - , �,I ; ' : ; iI �_j . ; . • : •• • -- --, • • • r,i I , I N \'� • 1 • I .._, al ?! = i z to G TTO M , • FRo 1 . Ft_ooc)I.JAs( DI�,TA : ' ' • . Wit)rn- % I so ' t SG.G71otJAL•AR6-A L 21511 oc I-c-(=q;-1 -cps t vJA-TER. SuRFA GE- ' (1 , 4I FRe-.7 '1 FL.bCD PR-oF 1� 4).:~ ; : . . E.0-r'TOM ELEvATtolJi ti. - 5;:0 + • ), GM;AtJt)G1 �TTOM St-o -AT Pe : IS FI ± DE?TI-••1 = 24. 4� t t. ESTIMAT aED rM ro .WtDTI4 . - (2;511 ,. :.244 2- 4 , > 1,5c) = loo. 11 . ESTIMATrp SIDE • (icca eo,14) . 24.4. = I. 8'3 % I • I 1 • , GAPAGIT'( C� 25'11 I '41'1 -�'p s 1:- 12, G? S 4 : • FoRQ - 11 ;.•9.1'6 :. i • : : . ' : . - ' 1 . SEc-rtotJA.t- AREA' '.+ ' :gid ; 4.') • .1 ,ci IS: SF (Iq,6 K 1,I33 )<2) •4-(Z X cao•�14 E mMAT p pEPTN (-CRY Iq,B' , K Iq. a = 1920 x I��iIS .1 , r ''l 1 I n P-, r I r-- . 1 n -r. .-. 1 ' I n :. • le • • • • • • t: , �. • ,p +I � .' 1 tl�.ly SN'" '' ' , •y I�a1411•I. 4 }r I; r '' ,. :Ile :.) ;, Sl1t1.41,1`i!" ' g•ii 1''t..4 it 71.`r..I 'i't.V '•,,re• !r.1.,.4'reCIS: S:XIII I414:'Ity• •, If!:•;'1;r,. •,I ,.,t,,1,l••' . I .r .6!', '' +, .,, • \) 4 • .r l 'Il ,�', .I. '..,, 1 • i. ar �� 1.+l�.IUa, '�'• •.4..,...,,,,,..,... •„•••jl:.i+ly('P 1f '•t r"'jl rpf'• !..I: • •;4 ••1ir5I." 1 ;,.,: I �St r• j: l r:,I,,( '// • % :‘,„,.. .. ..••,,,,..,„„ i'•_'j;.. 1Fii. , 'tv?av • II ^i•.CC, •'•�' W;� u,1:!.ir.,,6 rrr, .t 'A ,{.. '1, �� ..� f' 1 / / ''': J•f" M}!i 'GI" ' ..' Ti� ' % '�� , rr !',1:: ''"�,.i't !' _N"I1 ! 4, r:: ' 1 .i, '!.?.? : .'ut f to.!;� '' 3... r�::' 'r r.1 q",{'rl h/.y y. r.I r+;' •.r • I . 41/y•� "`,: I,,.r __� 1 i .. • • mb`'` 1 Il:•.•' R' :411 '• , f+s: !t r,... 1 a;I'.: , "it• , 11 • . JAI.' • hi.:t:l :f ii�:t` i4:a e`�14 a{�;i';4.� r��.':.1iI'rJ'" rrrlIv. �/ I. ,}}{J�► �� 9` ::,:i i rt.ffl �f 1,- .f , r �; i:.n•:, , ly .... •p. i.kt,1:. `, �, r' r..• �., 1' j''4. rr ',f.li ' r' I�I'1r fli ri,/!,,1•,. .e• •I r. �r•, .1 t•. ,. hr' ' .. l%4",a7'' t F;;h 'e• 9;;'1'ry"l, i A�yli •",� :r,!4*K 'il.. .1.."•':,:�,,' ) �I• ; 1'al• .,• ,`•,, , [ p•1 {r'!1#ll.i S`^'ii�a�l':r, t J.RXdt',µ.,� % 't fl 'YrJy',,^[�4y:r'r;. .4�.)dQ•,�'f!1,1. :;:F,s .n' '! ,,v O �'' 'I /i ; :4 :! 11 i. '�,1.: � �{4,: 1 ,i SSr�I„)iS *�Ye:' PPJJ1!'1 11,t'/'P. "' k�j� 'r I r„ • f!'r 1• ( r 't e., % :1 r'1. i" 'tj� (1'14 ;',' Y' ,l; }.Af .r... i.�:.: 1,• •. r t y •� ,,vl, r ; j ./ ,,(.� , t .�Ly Lj.'i! ��1'1 > Ilse III:7,1`' /i - :'ji r '� .+"r' .N. �,,.. ;i 'iA•.F• 6' ',i c J. .{r r ''L'd :� '•,� s .�} - ';l'#) j ,. i4►r; tt�!f n" •, c;. i! ''ik.j• , ,:.: .1.; —� ,14.•:.$ ` it:! •,,I[I:: ,? 1 alit r!.:,: .!IVr �/f.:,� ..v '.r .+1., •t s'! • I,i: �t,l '�I^'i�' i.� ilf'c I r Il (� '1 •'�, /'1 .ki'[ly'`� ail.,, ••Kf t ,•'`'.;;;: r F0, ,::0. L.r,•;f •i }arri.. .,11.Iti 4?1' , (i ' !' , rrv' '►.1:I .i i i t •`.'f � t i•�, '�� •f1';1. S. Itt P...ebi9• 4. ti Pry .:� •r t �'I i• ,r! ,i IY h•,; .L' +i" ,:: •:1.1�•' •:1•• t.J•:' . R ,+f•+. 41 a .rl 'S.� _- y . , • • 6t l •Ii � •M1''�{�1'!J.: .:✓': ,n.. ..4`�1 [,}�y.•. r.' 1 .1 l Y rly ' � t;� �,: • 1. . • r+ 'IFi+u' ' -1, '1 r•( 1 it 1 f••! 11j • :._ ' [ 'wf., lw( li' •••4'• il:,:l' !!•i:' • ,.,...• ..q , , ' 'r• I . ' / rl4. r' • 1. 4�. �!k ,'�+.t.�° ' !;> ,��;y1�'•P,.:. iii '.lt, t' I;C tl� ' . l�ltl, t;+ .. ;i{4;'. 'r I, ':�?' ;i '.1 I 1 O j tr r'r i - 7' t i y 1 ,, ,'•Q. :i: r 1, r . ' •Mil. yT. ,7'• t.•d?:,` It 1' !l; I:p:,.i.; .,,'..> •Y:1' . r• !1•14 :1 T j r, ,::( ,. J - • ! •1 •t llir ,i:,f't 4)h: ;. l' .�'�.{ { ,4 ,:I.±i 1:!`••r•!; a'>'.r l ..f�� '1 'd.r. : •'.1 +:. r• ... ; ' • t • l;l ): �,.. 3 !" '! .`Y'.. ''� �•�11+`r,C7O� 4. �1. ,,II1�.• �., n:j!rl� 'j•' rl.l,.,..6 ,', vrl �. :i• • t ', • "'..,ir .. ,!. +,+ .'• '',)d .M k, .• :.i: C!k1 .!. A 1•;:,;r .i�.. :� .i' • •; ••'.. f•r, '•i 1..1 I �l' ;r: „till.' 1:'. it h)f •rl. �4 , ,1 • 1 t� 1' ':!'.' ,„t`.r•M'qr.•yt'� ��'",,�.i {i .' 5 ,.•�j. �.�'j: 1 ::�7�.1:. -• .5• ;L.: • ' :, •I �r 'r4 ,.r;l• ). f J � ' :,,,;4.>'} .. F,,,: .l.a�i�'•r,. aY�' X !{�1S;ii: �:� .IS.� rr:,,��,,!!•• i.•'�f: +1' .t•ij 1..' ;r .i.t,. t. 1f''$ �}}t• �,.. },,• g S.r, :1 ! r 1,I;'; I' �i l •i r l Ill''''� .1g 'z,..N 0,•: i il)) .1 it M.x• +`ar I) 0 •' '-•:•' . '`.1- -4 1. ,1. .: "� ,, 'i, . . ' ''�,r.r+�t l•'!��l• irYa C4.i. 1.1•t�" `t.•...4., �. I} I�Y 1,':N'%;' 7,.:.'••.j-�. 4 1 NN r ',4�','.l• .:•'7...,1 t oS' iJ i� h: .4.�; , ,' .i !.,' if1 '11 ':i;,. .1;. ' is�-if'.!^�" :. „"r.,. �: x u:.,ilS,.' �r j' , �:•'!,::. '" .o. '..,).•-Xi,..,+' tr •• :1' ;1 • 'r , .I•' '• .ir:Y✓ ,. ,. r :fFi7 ,:,�;!.mi.",':1�m'!:...- i: . Y�;S ltl in i'f::° Jt' 'f :r •,, . 7 ?,...1•r:,� n i' D a.i 'I y ,,ya },�'•. �•r. t� • ';.`M[Ty.,.,�.64, j r13:;t`.'•p/� :/ ✓t�•7: • ( -f�'' :„. .I;:. . : ,ft �� I' ( •i . 1�11!' -••7"^r 4 • '.y•/j;,1•01. .� {' J ! "A itr .,,. •..' •l!' • ;,'" .t;'i i :1; 1. • I . ••r, ,.r ., rY`f1.• :,• •-,{lA{;1•4At:..t< F% ,.' .•-• 4 ; `e.P '1 ''''j, .(�}•: l.•tt'14...*r(:.1 •y',.',•• r't,)•t If!'�'�•••'I 0, !. ', 1� }l '.,+ ! r ,;. f•'I I . 'f''• ,••• , Y' fi. 4 £ •y''t ((` Q ,"yi .1 ..1 11,• : !. : i!' 1�,/: , ,t .:j�''L'� )1.J�F�.i�S•1'J�},h'' :..��17.1'. f.!5,.b,�, iE�, •r �, A• 11 n , , I,I• l� .f „� •�+ � f f .•�' .A yn� !,(,x,' '� .1...I:4.T•,1 , I '1Si'1•, ''1,, ' ;.I. •'rl: 1 t• a,, .{ i (;'� t 1• :. I^" ' ..' 4,11h'..E;4' r�, rr'.%� jt •.. °• • ..•.I•I: :' `r+y,.:l. ' •4r ''. I r;l't'. t rt ,.' I, , r I • I V • �, - 4`� 1' • .+ 1�. . '� _ rl i l•' ,1iA i i +. 'r,1� • if L V try'l ',(,-Ai.'.''t f • ,'.1'}n� 't''•hr •t'' , �:',' • , • • ' 1' S• •' •', •,••M - ,:, 0• d1• 1x' �`.'t Ill `;4!ifri 40.1 ;11, a' tto.tY1 i•. '•+' • I `' ,. 7 :.1,.. i r;. . .•I •'! ' • ..m I •,,, '' I,r% 1 • ,lira,"//Irrp ti�,r,•t..i, •�: ,;.• 1 l!.t' ' . �` .t .I y;�: . '„ `;'It., 3. • I1 .I • is •� ' �' J :l • :�I •, II 'l[�+tj;l fly� ,:�'j ' , 'j:t;' '•le • .'1: ' > • •; I ';1:(,• • I. y r , �i I C •, ' , ,• �:\ , •! 11 ,I,Q .; ./i., • .. •.• . • ' in •,, I. . ...-, . f . . .. td . 4 .. . .•..) .., .- • i ��; s�,4;aLli • 4' ' , I l I N • r I ' r 41 (' 1 . • (1k. "it , ,i• ^fit" ----'^-1 ( .•. a • /! k r„, , f. ' . cl. 4;ri*f'�'�01 -, l• yu a - , $ ( ;' r' h i. • (�y'lam .''}}�� (:'ll t��•+� � 't1il; �� �tl • ! J i I • 1�' ' ''H t ' ' ' • ' , •• II q• YC •'�''t+'• /:;/.) •I,I' 1i''.r�'tij'1;C: 't• ./ , i - , • , , • ?' il,,: z�+� 1,1I' �•I.,�',.'.,., 1 I.1�, •I I. rr• ',f. . 1 •I+ . JOB .- ;Z BUSH.ROED& HITCL..:JS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS &LAND SURVEYORS SHEET NO OF 2009 Minor Avenue East CALCULATED BY a DATE ' - 'Lie, —`t Seattle,WA 98102 -- (206)323-4144 CHECKED BY DATE B R H (206) 323-7135 * Fax SCALE X I4-... -I t 3C. G.f", 1 -7-•C..14 . .7 ;oJ r A`GC,.J w, y\ OJ r t..e.e_,,.>w -TD aA I 1 v+,� �Z CA '•./OI1' Q A v01 —4. ,.G[.v,---. "To Tr�.1 0,50 Z'1 /5Ar .- LI 1, o= 2,r,? , I !.-.1, o-s 2,2, I S. o r 2"c--, I 4:), of 2,2.,I v✓01. Q A-r.e.a-_ - ; I, rLa -e. I �G G r !...G i C..F SF Gc-S 1 i I i v .S 40 1 cf-, -2 ;J , 61 'I 1 I ,(b4-O � � I , ' I , I ;D , '�_qo:o �,] ; 1 . _v O I . 4-'& S c 12 ( , °`DO �- , I.22 � Z �^ G; r) (.'4 = ,- -r2 '..9� C2�% SB� , IS3 ^C42) 1 �0 :� 1 1 14- •_ .OJC O -, E7. 1 I ,-Ls %-"? 1 <O 1 8S 1 , , 1 28c1 -; ;., lIp 2 I I , S0 el c-7 Z 1 SS "3 00 '17.42 i 1 14414- lq 4 -l./li) 600 ` v SO J00 I ::.� ^ca.S ILo , d-2o '?oo , 4'. 1 I t i-ci21.� 41 t w 1 - I6 �g4- eS 1 .6.4S : .a2 t ,200 gcoS ,"?"1c, 2 - o,an: 4tp4 DSO 1q S--;q, ?'"7C I1")^22c`3 r7 1D2S 110"Y) ?)00 2 �1013� C14c1DD ......_... .. , . 'RD I UCT 70-i(Sp.5�l HIS„P�.d)/A ).heo Y .L 0I171.T.QOr?c.(1Cl1AH,dob225-0p BUSH, ROED &HITCHING 4C. ,os l31 CIVIL ENGINEERS &LAN,. .,JRVEYORS 2009 Minor Avenue East SHEET NO• OF Seattle,WA 98102 CUCULATED BY -TA. DATE - — 9 Z (206)323-4144 BRH (206) 323-7135 *Fax CHECKED BY DATE SGtL E �I� LL DEVE —OPCD GorJDiTio,J� . • • A2Etz, Vol ,...c. A?c,6, col ,. Q Ate. o.302'1S t orta I El_EJ. tJ, o= 2.Q .i *�, oT 2,R. S, of ea \/o 1 A I . �T SG GF S SF- C!-S q II S40 I ci73 O. O Iq ')3 [ I , 2 - O , GS3 51 1S0 31 14(402 61, 41c .;, IS La^-0 . I' l 13-) Soo 122,')24 344. '71S 23, 959 I4co �oS3 112, 2-) S I, 'L -) 12 ISo, 150 2(40‘z,,, So3 53,..')So... .._1,07"), S-1q 3"4- "302 ^.o'. , ga0 1, 42q 3 153, 1 oc, 4S1 , S2)155o. 124012 542 ( le) 4:- 11 eS0 I , 48'� 4. 1'lI , l000 Sso,38 102..,.21S 1 �4415 �La4 50'1) 21)1) SAS I, lo3q 1S ISO13S0 '1S(o54-c ko$.,.SSo 24-9,501. 1 � �10� 14l 2�3io10.� I, '? 44 11(0 'L11 Soo g521o10-; 't .°(6)0 321 ,. Q(o I ��-� 013 SSS4c 2, 00Q 11') 25O, SCO It 191,186 1¢� ( '1-25 397, Oto2 l5-161 ,Sco -5Zbr "12 'L, 04 I;a 'I-g4t0SO I4SS11(02 11, 4So . 4-)512:A9 I ,1 I101471 �14 'Soo 2, Io21) , 2)--)5 I ,1'122S5 OS :1-15 SSibi 21V;0,4-53 42SIoSo 2 ,6119 MIDELU 20eI friJ�I AA — no_URt Ae 1d04LSCq a.,. n�( 1.k�+• na,uo.. 1 \ J \ \ Y �0 , ,•\ • GI' \ \'57N --, � = 8°49' 23" ---- - • -- _ 4 1 3' 1 '�E� T2E 7. 6 0 \ _'�` R = 667. 96 _ - ,� PPS \ 1/ A ' 9 1 Ng41'02II E /// -x • G-L 60.83 �'TC /! 20 P.S. \N - / Q\ , \\ • / ,% 15'WATER EASEMENT /2" REC. NO. 9106060995 & 900628 14 35 r ,;' ..,..y\ \'" ; ``'°' SO _ V WATER / d• ALVE CHAMBER Gr( 12 ADS a 10-ADS a 1 1291 vie Li? o• U I%: 9i ��GAT� U �' O ' U 1 1 .ill oa• 2 L_ 1 . 3 U_ • 7T I . J A.C. DRIVE 1 • : 1 1 . CO • (f) :. •• in Q N N 11 ! 4, 15 I/ -i (Ni 60' NON BUILDABLE • - EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT C) 1 N_ REC. NO. 911020705 01 CV \ U 1 1 , II .�. Ln ':r- 20' METRO SEWER EASEMENT •n �\ REC. NO. 8605020840 a \I =o �00 J .� —r BUSH. ROED & HITCHINGS,INC. ' CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS SHEET NO os ' 2009 Minor Avenue East �%� -_ y - CALCULATED B, l . DATE Seattle.WA 98102 —.0.---• (206)323-4144 CHECKED BY DATE B RH (206)323-7135 * Fax SCALE f - �J t. +. ( ( 221A„ H, J2 • �� -1 j 1to, 4r- L." . Zo� , • , �ti.� P ..4/ —• ,p ,t om X o( i 2/ (Dc.A -ri 0— .. i S . -.-Co PP . w,2 �e ''' J " �r--)P ,.. op2 1.7a k. S . r1 0.'I ,..N )Q1' 2... '5 ✓r�Q 1 6%SS—,—it ;,i a r Z kQJ, -.DI le2.- I , - ,.ncr au.1, so...xyl i mmn�.r_Groot 1em 01171.To Oar MI(TOLL REF 1106a}(y0 KING COUNTY. WAS HINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL ' FIGURE 3.5.1C 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS _ _._H. _%. ;.-, ,� A. Ni• -� — .yam---• —�1--- , i �-�_�� • �, �. - , , -.7"-• •A* : L,••••'__i ' ,.:::: • . �� ' i E, liktil 17‘ /---,. 1 -ii :-\ .— .sh 1 I . g- .‘,,,...n . Ar? , /8 ,.-r 1 1 , ._,.--- / . __- i -, • 40, , ,,,,„ ., ,. , , iq %.-{i.....- .- .16,0i1 _g_ . 2 . : 110" • i: ....., \ illy , i. <--- • '.9 P j . ., ,:...:, 1-; .. .-7,.. --.- - ' rjf ‘4* c'i,0 mikA,.. __. „L-. 40 . ,----Ti- -,_ 4,. . - ' .-, ,- :1, , i _,.. itm ___,,c;: , 1 o. ::turomm.,, 0 ry i, A ,. A \ - ,(,,,....,...A,/,I.:A. /I _,...iiiiii0 4111k kIIV 0-sy 'fir ' ,t6- - .1111.71 - .r - 't�A a. ► ���'�. +, • . ;- � ��A,.till -ter. -� -R. ,100,.. c �• • . L'igikilifiti,xi A I i ''• . . .- ittaii ...: — w IOW\ bt, f \ 'T i ,i 4 MOM I A' .e. ....... '''').pre.k ril ki 0 a'grill I . . !."-... :\ ....: 111111 ice' 1 ? , tr 104114 _,..i --= Tr i , roma \___ -0,:, '''' iiimse c.? .‘ A 4 .4.1 / ..•-.. • r . ././[int= . c.. '''''''-' &--- 1‘. 7-14hiswi al'ici,elf.c: � � � � : �, • ..„ 1 lliO _ : .1 . / gralligs _11 ‘1EIPLI,- r 20 ' . i 3111141.11ki- o i . AwAwmplik 174 ,,40-1.1F/ 1 ik . 1 v J-- ., iI, N __ . e'r.- \-t-' i m\. J • . N - !I r i,,,l i,y._ .\,x --i sAi P,nO,R,:,,,,_i 1,( .. „-(i1. 7t.z! s i � '��� \c r; . �. �' tour 1 + l . f 7; - ` .� 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION ` l � -� I� c� • I: 35 3.4�' 'S PRECIPITATION IOPLUVIALS OF 2-YEAR N INCHES TOTAL ( i _ �,t - 0 1 2 3 ♦ S 111 7 i W es NC13 (V h� f -- 1s 300.000 3.5.1-8 1140 i KING COUNTY. WAS HINGTON. S UR FACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1E 10-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS y -07• r _Li: ; , —T t ):.i. 4 7 . , .... -.., -' L'''i: 30 + .� - .w s+..u1r i ' r.. 1O11a1r• C...\. - I C J._. \ + :t- 'TILE J , ` . •I .. liNL : , ••\,.. ) .--..' f ( i ;:-.- 3<r-.--- ' .; 3./ /4' A iwill % ''' .Thi 7. ' ,_ • ' j !.--....- •-'- 'AV --I -- li . i %. ..-- 1413• • .- 1 - Illertir., Pi 1 VI .4 Al*Villif* "° *V ..-,'"%.„ . \,,,,. gm vA a Is) ) i, fik ) k , _ , .., .. si........ r•••4 , 3.2 ,' rail . Rk\ i ( 1 . zativio, -- .• , A K..-4 1 ,‘11.,, ,,- .... .,1:7.,...-- . IP a gt. 1 .ea„Firalrhhigk ii!l -N -/s',....._.,t... ... A , iii ‘. .1,,...,......4,j,H rippi. ._ . ..„,_ \ .. , .,,: . ... 1 • ill t .6.ii � k. _ .1 Ilty_ -- `r i MR.101 • ' ----- 4 0 ).71 ViNrir-. M -_ ,4. I (91111 1 '.,. '\ illaiiiviefil . 1 • ) .1tr_c_i_.:‘ ,.= ,./.I r : -•"7-- -='• (-N ,• . ii= - iiiiiiit4P . , i • . . ., ,....:1-. ,-. ., . ,/-77 • Do imis.liplirir 1 - 1 i . r.=.11 winr- , INAL verj,..i. t - , � Jl • r .4_ ._,__,0 tifk.„ -t-- _ • H .., ....J_ ' -I,. _ _ - - \..__- .* - N! g , ll -,°"170 Mir -, * i-jej ; - mil- ---- prPflElig , i t..\. . i I / ,.--' t i . I ' MI i _ ....... -- le ,,.......- ,...if 1 10-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION tic' w , �' _ 3.4� ISOPLUVIALS OF 10-YEAR 24-HOURAIF --, , - �-'a5 • TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 30 v I. _ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I Milos �As ..7� •�.� l' 3.5.1-10 35 l` 1jgp�+ 4.0 1:JOo•oo0 KING COUNTY, W ASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL • 7URE3.5.1H 100-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS 3.0 ---, • --; . im,— • •:,.- A ;.',. - ';.-it9 -T r- .--- - -f-c4 - - - - . - ."-- - ----.77.. .-- 7- -- 4.0 . ,.., . s i .__.\-,,\ ‘. : _‘.— . , I . ' " ` , i .',. ' ' 1 (1. ..,--... e.... i--. .4%... 4*.Z- 11311r- ::i : -- 4. P' :-Z 1 . • .' T : _ 0._,. 't (lIN1 / . .., _ _. : _ • /.‘ ( A 1 _ _. . 1 -7..<, - , , . ..i ,,,,....,_•,.. • ..., -,, .-..... i . 4 • 43 ; *,--- *' : IV AK N‘,/ ,...: . :'. '' _. (7. ,i 1 — 1 34 4 1 '. , 744-7; - ....N. !• -i. • .• .-ir i . . r-'-' • Pr- ..i ..... - id oolleit -_,q'c -, .iellki. i. 01/4, 7., - i-li-k '0 - liiiii-t... .. v C r$ ;.' . 111- Aellkdi :::t\ Ilitir 1Pcr _10e951011°1 -. it diP• II Tliftl-t/. ,. ,;MP IVOR"-- , �a 17- .. I, i , (.3-›-- \ 111611W.k.. - ArAk- -XV r '-'"'". 41i . 1 , ,- .,c_ 1 luring irtit%1001, 1167441\ •. % kO. 2. . \ tit4 . , / , dIA •li 'T. or_ .\ _..i., 2,, f_ .. .1\ :. z_,J , i .r...t c,.:.___ 4..4 .6.41 ,, , (7. , cit... . \-eliNkk j '= T ! IILit= �F!�. j e r it III ir A .,, C.:.; c.: - V ila g ." 1, V C 'PAIN thillii.lin \' ''.-1-.--i—' fIlijIgli 5,411511014 I ri:1 I PP11 II� 1 � 4111a 41 6\4 iLli- t- 1 -I ,i- CP- . - _ iiMJ 'J Fir/ , .J= • te- , 7Nis irf :.1 14,„ _. , 415k, T, "-- .., 1 r :S.. )ter-' ) 14:._,. , Y--I —� _ _- r • 0) • frof 5 10. (EAR 24—HOUR PRECIPITATION . . 4j ....,7 . 6. i 3.. ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 24-HOUR .411 91 ti � St it -'_,,/ 5.5 TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 0* , ~- - C., I 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 aMu.s 3.5.1-13 ' ~ -f a`' o h• 1/90 i �• tnn eee • ! ' KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.11 IN-YEAR 7-DAY ISOPLUVIALS .:-i • - 0.c7 - - ,4-i* - -; VN Fikl, Far • ''--- .- - -. ... . 0 ,7 ,. .--;-.11 i y-i ---) P ., . ... 1-`, g6 '' dr 7,.,._!' • '-- % ,, ---"_7,4 4 -.1 '' 2:-....:7, 'T- A 1 • '- 8 8 III. ' 1 :;\--1\•• I I i\ 9.0 . 9.4 9.2 ._=_.,, . , vivi •- \ air ,,e1 ‘\ \ t-:-. dr allarisi ..._.) : 9.8 R6 101....04' ----,0 ' •• .-444Mupi, k A ' . \ t . • . _ - . -- 1 1 '- - ... i < -.„--ibitio.clur - „ er+,00•- --i, -----__.-;A. 7%7, -. . / , -is 1 - -- I•, , ..' . . , - -.... .tv-ig. _ ------01,- i / -, i • -iir . - - , --4 II -1 It Aktre - a V ,. Mt . 4 • II/ 3r. 'r•• .4.' .. • lie Ut.1 •i• 11F, 161% 71111ttli K40,°,•°j•-meg.D--.17--:0-0-Th' W moolitiv,.., , .102k ii ...Tri , 1-kes - /- ‘,. ---- oil - _ • ii — witat• Nwirh-m_ _Tiogr1/4%.‘ , __J . ... ,,/, - L r..I. ./14 ' - yill -tilglifolkiliU:. ;. s • k, . _ . , -. A ..„ 7----, \ 4k. .'••••• . .... ./=,i N.... ie.ra.-1/474tv --vg-si • _ ---k. , . 7,5,, 'r \ • .-:- '''' •-r-• , Q1:1,...-r-- • \i I first /,. , . ,,= • a•.-. ... r 'EN V- . II en.-Air m W 4r,... et ,141-5 ismiWomilto%- :de ...... i,. - ..• -) r / f..fi nAltill." 11-5 igid., 7" kN s s — ii.1.7.A• i L Agiiiintil lti . r.S. If .= . --1 . 7.1.9- ikw.fif _ .,... cv tiViit- • 'N S' if i)....,- . 4 Y. 211SV. I ) Z fr C . 2 C ' ' • • ) 4 •i — . \ —•.4. : 100-YEAR 7-DAY PRECIPITATION . o f -- T. 1.__ _ / .. 15.0 --- 3.4 -----ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 7-DAY 3.• • (1., , . i _ • , TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 0' .2.,1- ''• L" 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I WW1 , CS ' ‘• 1:300,000 3.5.1-14 :-.Y l':e -' 1/90 . - 1 . X- t N...\13 (.)1\'• . -. . -: to - I .. .. '-. 1 a it .........:.;,..........4„ .::::pitet, ... .. ._ _ , ,--1 1 1.... (........,.............._... •. :.. . ss, . :...... ..s,,:n •g,NC _ tt i ABM 111 15. t 11111117 •• �I � BeC o I 1 ---M*,..° " • ------- Iiiiiwir., 11! . ,,s, BeD ,......-46.- \\r, 4,- go : . • %insp;„. 'dillilltrael BM li ° -Ai Mi. '.....::' 1: rr 6 1", I" BeD dy •BeC c W OIva o ....4 illip. .:,.... 7/..t1.--",.,. 0------iftH i 5 / RA ROAD Tu \` � •� .. • �, , lac ti �0 - .eR�pE \ .'-..7 i . :---1.•' � .a -- II Q• '0e• � off - II vJ 1� ' Q. G\I I► -' W o _ ! _ i- a Loa,— \\1► \A13 • Ill la -FrL:, r- I i. PY • I �,_ ?J(3q I I..,P r tvq. Ng I ; I 4 ;. gil i i �p----1s-% —OG.v- Ur i I IFS L. � Wo Ibill tge;)1Gol)ourse I pA �� � , _ 62aJ S -Le- - I oco _I - • ' BM e �. THE , CI t`'C"Y.^o` 1...0w- :•1 30�,= S Sew _ OR .--Oa— , - a► limos''- : I_ 0 I ao ' •il _-- M 16 •417,:rA:2z s W It ; f' Longacre$ �, I • \ Pu . � , ,° �1 ' Is R --II — II = Wo i _ 40 Ir. r�%.---- ,,,iii -4 } Ur . A r ` b. rack ''r— • ill N" V IIST•%71.—7.7j1 T ilix L. Nj — I7I 27'30"-L Ur • ' . (Z ) ' • SO D Z• m Z • Wo ,i i E� • 0 / V'>1., ,,,Pu : 12 ( tb Ur ►• I '1 i ii PY ' Sk \ n Wo Ur I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WA -I- ER DESIGN MANUAL - (2) CN values can be area weighted when they apply to pervious areas of similar CN's (within 20 CN points). However, high CN areas should not be combined with low CN areas (unless the low CN areas are less than 15% of the subbasin). In this case, separate hydrographs should be generated and summed to form one hydrograph. FIGURE 3.5.2A HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP OF THE SOILS IN KING COUNTY I HYDROLOGIC HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP GROUP' SOIL GROUP GROUP• 1 ' Alderwood C Orcas Peat D Arents, Alderwood Material C Oridia D Arents, Everett Material B Ovall C - Beausite C Pilchuck C Bellingham • D Puaet D Briscot D Puvallu. B Buckley • D Ragnar B Coastal Beaches Variable Renton D Earimont Silt Loam D Riverwash Variable Edgewick C Salal C Everett A/B `Sammamish D Indianola A Seattle D , Kitsap C Shacar D Klaus C Si Silt C Mixed Alluvial Land Variable Snohomish D Neilton A Sultan C Newberg B Tukwila D Nooksack C Urban Variable Normal Sandy Loam D Woodinville D HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS A. (Low runoff potential). Soils having high infiltration rates, even when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of deep,well-to-excessively drained sands or gravels. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. B. (Moderately low runoff potential). Soils having moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of moderately fine to moderately coarse textures. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. C. (Moderately high runoff potential). Soils having slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine to fine textures. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. D. (High runoff potential). Soils having very slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a hardpan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. - - From SCS, TR-55: Second Edition,June 1986, Exhibit A-1. Revisions made from SCS, Soil Interpretation Record, Form #5, September 1988. 1 *-, 3.5.2-2 1 1/92 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WA-i ER DESIGN MANUAL TABLE 3.5.2B SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS . SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) • ; Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type 1A L- rainfall distribution. 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY • HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION A B C I D ` Cultivated land(1): winter condition 86 91 94 195 L Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: I 65 78 85 89 3as Wood or forest land: undisturbed or older second growth 42 64 76 ) 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries. landscaping. . good condition: grass cover on 75% or more of the area 68 80 86 90 fair condition: grass cover on 50% to 75% of the area 77 85 90 92 Gravel roads and parking lots 76 85 89 91 Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 87 89 Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs, etc. 98 98 98 198 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 •. 100 Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 DU/GA 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA 30 impervious portion 3.0 DU/GA 34 of the site or basin ' 3.5 DU/GA 38 • 4.0 DU/GA 42 -- 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU/GA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 7.0 DU/GA 56 Planned unit developments. % impervious condominiums, apartments, must be computed commercial business and industrial areas. • (1) For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) . Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system: (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. i ti 3.5.2-3 • 11/92 I JF .2-A7101.1 RATES ': infiltst less 2 less 3 1 0. 069 0. 069 0. 069 2 .3 1. 705 4 5 0. 353 0. 353 0. 353 6 1. 815 7 0. 026 0. 026 0. 026 8 0. 96 0. 96 0. 96 9 1. 08 1. 08 10 0. 071 0. 071 0. 071 11 0. 0079 • 12 0. 07 0. 07 0. 07 _ 13 0. 584 0. 584 0. 584 14 0. 0128 0. 0128 15 0. 0052 16 0. 289 0. 289 0. 289 7. 0479 '3. 5148 2. 422 0. 503421 0. 35148 0. 30275 -I I **************************************************************** Cit rof Renton WA Reprinted: 10/30/97 12 :40 Receipt **** *********************************************************** Receipt Number: R9706942 Amount : 2, 500 . 00 10/30/97 12 :40 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #1378 OPUS NWEST Init : LMN Project # : LUA97-164 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Total Fees : 2 , 508 . 32 This Payment 2 , 500 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 2 , 508 .32 Balance: . 00 *** t*********************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 2, 000 . 00 . . . , . - ' • , - , • , . , . , . .. . „ • , . • . , • . . 91.1°4414) r- • , , • . . , . - • . . . .. , j '. I .' . , . . ..,, , ,. . • , , • " . ,• • . , . • , . .........-.....,...... „„„„„•...• .......... .. ....., ' ' -; 'i RiliggiBERI:.....1-"r•-gi::::t:................................................................................... '. .."''''.....t.:::;NkilOtit.ii:it:g:',.:;•••tit.it.NI:•jit:-.',..;••:-•••:•,.I..-1...t:::.:•: .•:':it::'::••:•.-,.....t'itiittiiittiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitg••:•••,.::,:i...;:-..iiiiiiit•;.'::::,,,...,„:•,:iiitti$,;;;;FAt:-..-.0:::::::iiiii-tittti•tiiit*.?.?..tt.::::„;:„„:: „„i•,?•:i•.. - t. • , • - . - •- - - . . , . . _ , , i.tt0i,:t!i.ti: •- . i • I ••ttiP2 , .. • , . , , '. • ... " i'iittt4t - • .- I !iftittii : • - : , - -, ,• - '- : ., • , • ,- . ' • . ,'. : , : ' ' itiO•g ' - , i,goi. • , _ . , . • , t-t:it,j.:-.-:' , .• • , . , . • 1 • ,.: . • - . . . . , - , . . • -.. " -t.::•.iNiK: • . _ „ . . • ' . - ' • . • .p;ittiiii.i , - • - . .. . • • • - • •. . - . . . . . - iit•tt?..i.tit:i§ t_ , i....t.:,..;:.::t.I .- • . •. . • , . , .. . • - ' ' ' -MIR • . • . . . : ' „ . :itititttit:,..., ' . , . , . • , . -, • • , • • • t.itg:it:. ' ' ••::'..•:-.:.'..t.: ' ' - GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY - • • , ,.,,:....Jiii:-:.,i!::;, , AND ABANDONED MINE ASSESSMENT . . ... ........, .. . . . , ., ., ... . . .. .. 1 • ,,,„„.. . . • . . , . . .., . . , .... . . .._ . titimit . . .. . • , , _ . - , ,-, . , ., .. .. , .. . • " .• . . •, :„.„ . , , ?it.iii,,,t: - , . . •. - , - ,••••,..• , . ,_ . ., • ' 'N o rth,406 Upper and LowerSites.'„:„;:..i. . , . , i 1 - - ;;-:1::::;;•.• . • , • . Renton, Washington .. • :,•„:io.oi!, .. L_.• , • , . . , . . ...„....•:, • . . • . . • . . - . • • . . „. ., ... .....:„... . . „:„.„.,...:::.„ L _ . . • . , .. , . „ • , . ...::•.,•:„„, . ......... . ................ . ,, . .......... ,:::::::.• . ... . , . . • • . . , • .. • . .... . - ioN.,...i . - i , isegi,. ' • • , , . . . • . . . ...„..„„.• ... . . . . .. „ . • [ L goo -.,.. ..' .. . , _ . , - ' _ , • . . Project No.-. T-3453 •. • .• ., - - ' . . ....:.••:!....,ii...Ei . . . , , . . • . • - • - _ ,. .-E • • . . - • . . . , • " . . • , „ _ .„ . .....,,,....K, . 1 , 1 . ;.• • , . „ • • • . . • . . • _ _.., . .. • 1 :,,,,,:,••,!•:, • . . • • ,: ., . , . , . . ... ... . . . , . . .......,.: • , • .. . (7,',c:.7.--' • . -.. - .'.' ,;,Z.cr . , - ..'*.i..,.....!.— . r'(-:"••••r7.-7:'.' •' '•• .•'•-- ' •.• .- . • ' - '' 4i;::;i'.:::'rl,i, f - ' , ', --• .. f 1;2, ..-.:-.; . . ....................................,............. , ... . . 1 , , .. , ...-vv:::::zwows -v.,..4&•:4.• ' ' ":,.:...: '..........:..:'...::'.ne.;E:...,'i.:...........;.:.,:.: ::]Aigin:ii.iiiii..i.V..:..niimamii.,,imiiiA,..:...iii,i.i...iiiii;i:,.. ,.....,„m,;*,:i,:i:iiiiiiim....::.....;.r.i: .. ,,,...,,,:,,..,;,..........-,... .. , . '"* .-- - .• ' ''. ' ' . ''--:.'..:..M..•iYi::::ii.i':iNST:.'..E.."'..:'....g...:'...'.......n....'::..'.:-............':'':' ., - . ... .....,..: ....-,...i,.4 ., .4-::,...4.:...-„iv.e.-44..,:,p-1-i,oteip --- r:77.7.17:77;7,..::..-;;.::„. -.,,,,,,,...,,.- :„.,‘,.,,,, ...,, Terra . ' -. .. , , - -TAssociates Inc. . ,.. , p,..;,,,..,..,..„4,..,„:„.:,.1,.i.,4„,„...0,.,,•••••,..:-...:....„„y„...;‘,..,0„....,...r...,,,,,,.-,..„, , . , . , . .:•,...„....:,,,;,;••••.":„...,,,..\.::4•.•,,:::.,,,,„--,..,..0.:„..-.....,.,•,:.,,v .:-..: ::,.i • • • • , ..- - • . -. . '''' •••••••:'• '••••• •....„...............,.....:.... '‘ r'''''' . , ,.. c•••.;-•.,.%sy,„....„,..,:.„.....w.v..,....„0„.,.....•-•-::.•,...,..s....„„:......„,...w.,:„....,, .„••,..,:••••!••,,,„..••••:••••••:•:„.:•.,,,,i,i,•„ig,::.,.:.,....,...........,,...........:.::...,:,..:,.,:y.,:.,:.?.,i.„.„..„:•,:„.,,,„:„,,•„,.,.,:::,:,:,:,:•:,:::::,.,„:.:•:„.":::•:....:.:•..:•........::...•.....,...•.;::,.:.::,,,..„.„.,„: „,,I,m,n:r.,.,:.:„.,::..:•........,::::::;:..a.,0,,,..,,,„:„,..„,:„„„,:r....:.....:,:.:„„,::::.,.:.::,,.„,..,:.,:„.,„..„,,,,.,,,,,,:::..,...„,„,,ii!ii„i„,, . , . . , , , . . , , :.......r...... .• . .• . . . • _. • , .. s . .„ . • , . ...,•..„..::::.:•.:1„.,..„. . . . , . . • ....,.... • . , . . . , .. . . _ . , , • •:-.‘r,rz.••,,i . . • . . , , • ; • . _ . , , • , „ . . . . , .:.:.,.......• . . ......,....... . . . ,. . .. . ........ • " , . ................ _ . r_ •. . . . , . . . . . . . • • . . . , , . • . •..:11,,.::,,,...,...:1„ - • - • . , , liti . • • • • . . •, ., . • . , . ..,.,.,.,... . . . . .. • . . r- ' ' '' ''''''" ' ', • - . - - , , . . . . , - • ..• .. • Prepared fori:1!:.1 i1 { . . : . • . - • • . -. •‘ - ... •...- • • - , . s . - - - ...,•::::::::. . . i . • ,:::::„.. ..-!- . . ,.._.• - •m,-,:. • .. • . • . • ., ........... . „. ,. .. . , .•. . .. ., .. . . . , .. •• . r ...„.„:„. . . . . . . . . , . .1,-••:!.......... 1 - :::iii,iii•:,:l • „ • , . , " •••'00Us-Northwest, .LLCs, - • . - ; . . . . .. . ,___• toil -• _ " " .. . . • .. • • • . , ......„::.:;.: --- . . . ..- . • :.,..,........ • . , . „ - ' - Bellevue, • • :,::,,,:::„:a • i , . • ill , . _ ._ • . . . . , . ..,,,,,:•:,,,,,, . •,_ •L J ' - • , , ..,, ,. , . ,• . .. - ..:.g:?i ' • -' • . • . , . :..,......„,.., , . . • ., , , . ., , . , — .. ' I 1 ' 1 '!"" ' - . :::,.::..:,:ii;:i ' . - ': December 179• 1997:.....„: 1 , - :.:,.;::.,:ig• • , , ., . . .. 'ilog-• • . . . • . . • . . .. . - . • .go,zi,o,i - , . ,. . • " . . .... . - , . • • . - . ....,..„,„„,.. • . , . . ., • . • .- ' iiso - • . . . . • . • v:,....:.., . ; iiligim - , • -• .- • • . - • . • • . , • •,„„„,..]„,,, .. . , DEVELOPMENTPIANI&(5 • ' . iiii,ii . • .. . , , •,,,,,,,,,,,,,•:i.:..1 . ,. . • ....,;,...!,.,,..:., ... . . , ., , , • '•• 0171."'-'"--- • . .' .. ' . , • - . . • . •.,gi::• ...... ,, . .. .. .. . -- • - i!!':•.01 , . •, • . • . , • • ' • . •,;.%•,,•,...:. t d: .--/67 „r7.-7,13. 4, .6, .',7<t..;)? • ..... .•:.::i.'1 ' ' 1' '''.'5'.:*::::::••••••,:.:),!!:iiiiiiV''''':':'.'.:LF!'!'":::'..; i --;;;:iiiiitgliielega-i$:.e0:::i.':;;:::Li*:,•:igiiiiiiiiiiiiikii;,....;;;A:;:i;i1:'.':-:.:!:!'-'.1e.:;!'::it'.:'..:';'.1tii.!:'1i.N.!...:::$.ttEDI!itdpiegit;gelpi.:::....ii'iii!!i:,?;:,..-,.::::0:1::i.aligzizmaxelt;f:Izi,zi; ,. ............„...,.. .. . ...........,..... .... .. .. ... ....,...,„„.,...........,.,.............................................,........ .......... . 41.. . • . . . l_. - - ; • . • , . . . . . . . . ... . . . . .• . . .. . . • ' , . ,. • . TERRA:,ASSOCIATES, Inc. ,Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology • and Environmental Earth Sciences ` • • DEVELOPMENT.PLANNING CITY`',r -�,Tn�i. ' December 17, 1997 Project No: T-3453 DEC 1 •:0 '1997 �• J a >�,' G E Mr. Harry DeMarre .� � �.. !6 : . . Op.us.Northwest, LLC 200_ 112th Avenue NE, Suite 205 • Bellevue,Washington 98004 ' - Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study and Abandoned Mine Assessment North 405 Upper and Lower'Sites Renton, Washington References: 1,.:Report, Aerial Photograph Interpretation, Monster Road,prepared by Golder Associates, Inc.,. . Reference No. 973-1212,dated November 26,,1997'• -` , -2: Report, Preliminary Abandoned Mine Assessment,_prepared by Golder Associates, Inc., , Reference No.973-1212,`dated`August 22, 1997 3. Preliminary Geotechnical Study,Oaksdale Business Park;prepared by.Terra Associates;Inc., ' Project No. T-3453; dated February 15, 1997, Dear Harry: As requested;we have completed a geotechnical engineering study and,abandoned mine assessment for the above subject project, Our work.wasconducted in accordance with your instructions and authorization The results of our study indicate that previous'mining for coal,did occur on the site predominantly in the western portion'of Parcel A,the upper site. This coal mining activity extracted a'shallow coal seam from a depth of about 10 to 14 feet below existing surface grade using strip mining techniques However, there is`also evidence that mine prospects or tunnels were`advanced northeastward across the-site at a depth below this upper mined out coal seam: These mine prospects appear'to extend beyond.the.extent of the surface mining,operations and; therefore, would impactthe extreme northwest corner of the proposed building construction and the west portion of the Upper west parking lot. Fortunately, theJ prospects are relatively.shallow and limited in nature (less than 25 feet deep) and measures to mitigate the potential for surface.collapse can readily be implemented concurrent with site grading activities. 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101,' Kirkland, Washington 98034 • Phone (425) 821-7777. Mr. Harry DeMar9re, : December 17,, 197` ' Detailed discussion and: recommendations regarding the above issue, along`.with geotechnical engineering recommendations'for design arid construction,are. summarized'in the,attached'report.' " i . e...We'trust•the information presented is sufficient:to meet;your current needs If you have.any questions or'"require. additional informati.�. 11:, Sincerel Q t, YYour 0� � ��rd TERRA,AS =:G I • T: • .' T odore J: Sc ".•�' Z:., �, . `� J. Principal Enginee /44 ' TJS'ts t r. • • • ,Project No.T-3453 Page•No.,17 • • TABLE OF CONTENTS:, Page.' �. 1,0 • ' Project-Description 2.0 Site Conditions • • 2.1 Surface 2:2 Subsurface 3 2.3 ' 'Groundwater 4 3.0 Geologic.Hazards. : 4 3.1.' •Coal:Mines. 4 3:2 - Steep;Slopes 5 3:3 Seismic 6. 4.0-. Discussion and:Recommendations 6. .4.,1,. _ :General (' 4.2- " Site a Preparation and-Grading 4.3 Slopes and Embankments 8 . - 4.4 Excavations , 8 4.5 Foundations g 4:6 Slab-on-grade 9, 4.7' Retaining Walls 10\ . 4.8 Rockeries 10. 4.9 Drainage 4.10 Utilities 11` I. 4.1`l Pavements 1.1 5.0. 'Additional..Services • • ,11 _ 6.0 Limitations 12 Figures Vicinity Map ' _ _ :. Figure 1 I Exploration Location Plan Figure.2 :General Slope Fill Detail :.Figure 3' Retaining Wall Drainage Detail •Figure`4.1- Reinforced Fill/Rockery Cross-section Figure Appendix = Field Exploration and,Laboratory;Testing • . _ Appendix A : . Golder Associates,Inc :Reports Appendix B i' Geote"chnical. Engineering•Stud ' • `.. ' -a'nd'Abandoned Mi,ne'Assessment North;405 U pe"r'and,Lower:Sites. '- Renton Washin ton° l:b PROJECT'DESCRIPTION, project wilt consist'of developing`the'sites'-with office warehouse a structures:,;The structures will-'have`a ' ` clear,span'.hei ht'of'about::27'feet,andwill'be'constructed:using'precast•concrete,tilt'u .:wall,. anelsi' 'Perimeter" g P P P • wall'loads are expected in the range of three to:five kips-perlineal':foot:with:interior isolated:columns supporting the roof structure loaded to about'�.100 kips:" ,, Based,on drI sawin pre ared b :AHBL':dated October 22\'199.7..the structure on the.0 ersite;vill°have_its'fin'sh,• � .. constructeCd•at:EleV.' 72`. :.The,'structure onthe1-lower-site;"will;have'its_ffinishfloor constructed'at,Elev: 55: Si nifcant;g rading,.will be re 'uired-at'.this'.-site''in order to establish'these''.finish iloor`'elevations 'as`.well''a's_the g g q , :•perin, eter parking and,drive.access`routes.,'For"the.,upper site,.excavations:or cuts,into_,the'existin`;south'hillside ``•" " approachingdepthof25`feet;will be required to establish the parking arid:access.grade alongAhesouth'side of " lie structure: -The drawings by AHBL show:that the,,lower six,to.eight>feet of;this cut will be vertical with a backstops-graded at an;inclination,of 2:1,(Horizontal:Vertical): Fill natenal,rangingin depth,from';8 to-about';•12 :feet will be required.:to establish'desired btiilding`grade in!the north-central•:portion of'the structure and north. i parking area:`Off the north' �erimeter of the:parking area,;the.fill is`_shown Sloped-at,a.gradient.of P b P• P g, P. -The lower,site will have,its,fnish floor established at an elevation of 5.5:- Th'is:w ll;require excavations in excess.`" of 60;feet below existing•grade into the adjacent;eastern hillside:.,This-cut is;shownon'the drawings`prepared by AHBL'to belaid back at a finish inclination of 1 1 along the east perimeter of the structure: 'Along,the western; and northern margins of the';structure, maPProachinga depth'of,20 feett-will bere uiredto establshthe :adjacent parking and drive•accessgrade's:::' : '` A stormwaterrbiofiltratiop swale"will be constructed along`the west perimeter of the_Upper site, north 9t the lower • site`.'Tlie biofiltration swalewill,have.its"center line grade established.at Eley.=58 at the north end and Elev.'5.4at. the"south- Along the swale centerline; 'a inaximium excavation.depth of-about"30'feet will be required to establish'tthis" swale`grade:;..Art'eight,'to ten-foot-high'rockery;is Shown along[the;east,'erimeter-'of the..swale, su ortin '.the-vertical breakincradead'acent the east "arkiri lot{area;' , PP g g J P 8. � • _ alternative buildin :layout is-also proposed for the uppersite: This layout for Cascade Airgas,while'hvip a .different building'footprint; would require=similar:,grading as that;shown Orr the:Dctober 22;.T997•.drawings by,r The'recommendations,contained"in the following-section's`of this report are ased a on`the above`desi' ".features.`.,- b P ,gn Shoul'd:act'ual features':va ,or if chanchanges-pare.made,we,should"be;infoimed and'requested to.review:them'.in'order- :to supplement or amend our recommendations as'requir'ed.,- • , . ,- uDecember.`17 '1.997 Project No:=T-3453:. 2:0' - ^SITE CONDITIONS. ';_ 2:1 Surface`, - • - The site•is-=bounded_.s'.to'the least' and':southeast by',Monster;Road`"'and_a' METRO;sewer. treatment,:facility. Warehouse facilities'bound'the'site to•the north:. The Burlington=Northern Railzoad,right-of-way;,bounds the site to the.southwest. An-approximately 2 1%4 acre,parcel'owned,by METRO extends,northw`est of Monster Road and t".a -f- wide railroad liou'nds the'southern art'.of:`the'suli'ect' .ro erty:: -A��1;5-foot wide;water'Basemen nd 60, oot, . ,P J ,P , P , , - easement:run along the eastern and western parts of thenortl ern,propertyline,respectively.; The site is situated ori_a:hill surrounded;;by..the;Green•"-River valley--floor: MIstof-the eastern;-portion-ofthe site, • ''•Parcel 3 'is o en;nearly:flat'to entlyslo ing:ground extending fo the east and:north: hese.slopes•steepen ., to a gradient'of:approximately 3''1:at'the=southern margin:of Par ll's pea cel 3.'andlead;'off of the sife`toward'"the�lii k; on thead'acent;METRO= 'ro pe The,northern m°arg in-'of•t e=site. Slopes downward`toward the-neig boring warehouse facility,: ro -erties:at'an ' • ,overall inclination Of a roxim :atel y2:1.' This slo e.continues -wes :and into Parcel`4B.where:it turns southward and:runs_toward';the=Burlington_Northern'rightef-way=:at the site's'southwestern''margin. ;The:slope's-height • ranges'from,approximately;40'feetatthe:northeastern=cornerOf.the site`to 1:06,'feetrwithin.Parcel4B,.• -_ ' 'In"the vicinit of'Test'Pit TP-1,-,.we;observed a'north-south trendin , approximately-30-foot wide-mine adit-that` formed-an excavated,trough extending :'down the face of the slo pe,toward`the-northern-property,: lne:-'';We.,also' , noted:an;a roximatel : s xfoot s uare o Berri in'the groundr;eastof the that was.partially obscured,by.berry brambles. The opening''appeared''to be-'a mine,exploratory or ventilation shaft.:,_,The•approNimate,Ipcgiops of`; thesefeatures are shown.on Figure - • The southern-.Partsof.the site contains:southwest=facia 'slopes'standin ``at"`rades''of-u :'to`3 1. Relatively level'. :areas are.located adjacentto;the"top,of a`near-ve tical 30'to'40-foot high cut,made for:construction:ofthe adjacent'.. • ;' •;' railroad.' The .cutslope appeared,;to expose ,weathered sandstone and, did not show'any. seeps, •springs, or si 'nificant si ns`.of,instabili :g g ty... Portions.of'the cut were`draPed,with to' rovide:protection a ainst rockfalls ; ;A flat,,marshy.area:.is.situated.between'the railroad spur and:.Burlington Northern.:line within the northwestern corner of the.site:.�At.the:time:of our-January. 2‘, 1997,site•visit,:standing water of this low-lying " -."p ; !` _ area. Minor_standing;:water' ias also noted at the'eastern;part'of the,5ite:,,No signs-of recent'surface water runoff t s' or erosion were•noted during our visit' Vegetation atthesite consisted-of:wild'grasses and berrybramble,within • the open;,eastern.part,Of-the'site.;' Mature coniferous'and'deciduous trees; and occasional,:blackberry brambles covered the western sloped :Pa a No: 2 1, . December 7 199.7 Proj ectNo:T-34'53:. 2.2' Subsurface: explored:'subsur-face orid itions'at the-,Site-by excavating five test:pits at the.upper`site'and`three test pits-at the, lower site on-January.;22, 1997:'..The results Of our exploration, along with preliminary'conclusions'regarding`site development,,were presented in a,report dated,February,1'5,•1997. Subsequent this report,,Golder Associates,Inc. was retained-to:coiiplete a more detailed study,.to assess,the coalmine hazard'at�the•site The'ensuin g site P - ex p l'oati'on`.undertken,by ra , Golder Associates'Inc. included.the,excavation.;of several;test trenches•which,exten'ded . . to`d.`e the of:14 to'18:.feet below'existin site;grade for-lineal'distancesg'ran in from-SO.to over:,400`feet• The.' results'of their"study,.and�preliminary'conclusions were presentedinreports`dated,'August-22 and,'November26, :1997: 'These.reports are`attachedin•AA endixx'B., ' Followingthe Golder Associates, `Inc.'studies ,on December 11.l,through-'December. 15, 1997, we• drilled=three 'additional•soil test,borings:on.the,`upper". site..'The'se.-borings;were.performed, ot .further;assess=the, coalrmine. '. hazards:at the site and to evaluate;the excavation characteristics of the•underlying rock formations.: The locations . :of the:explorations:completed'by:Golder-Associates;'Inc:`and Terra Associates;'Inc:;;are:`shown,on,the-attached '_' ExplorationPlan Figure 2 The.`following provides ageneral summary of the conditions'observed: ',Ne'ar-surface+soils at the,.site:to'depth's l°to.2t5.feet;'were shown':to consist:of'fill•or-to so'il come.osed":of'an' . P . P -P. ,1- ''SUnderlying, _ese:nea - u ace `soils 'layers of weathered'sandstone,'- _ . .organic sandy:,to.,.elayey.siltto silty sand;: th r_Is rf y _ _ cla d;silt ,of:theRentonformation were;encountered:' The.weathered sandstone was ge•erall 4`noted to'be iria''., ' Y° g �. . Y . medium dense,,to'dense'condition:with the:clay and,silt strata noted to;be Stiff to hard Ve dense'"lacial till:or`till-like.soils were also observed'alon• .the'south p ortion'of the-u ersite at'Test-Pits TP- -�' g g P. -PP. . 2•and'TP-3-: These till'or'til'l-like•soils*were;.com osed:of.a sil fine'sand•with."ravel.and contained=occasional., ' , P ,tY. ,,. g. y cobbles and;clastsof highly�Weathered sandstone:'.Below'depths=of approximately '10.-toY'T5"'_feet ,:at.Test<Trench No..6 and':Test:Borin "B-2, sli ghtl>�weathered to.unweathered.,sandstone_was;',obseived;''Und`erlyin :the south: ,gr g Y - - . g J . . ' slopes,largeboulders.were.'also'noted:overlying the:Renton formation sandstone at Test Trench No.:2'and'_:Test Borin :B-3: • As.described'in the attached:.Golder_Associates,Inc:report;-the-area west'oflthe``u er site:and:.north of the.lower - P, PP - 'site has.been subject;to previous grading activity from coal.m,ining;->The.`coal, which.was shown to`reside'at a • relativel 'shallow de th of about',10 to 1.4':feet bel"ow':was''extracted b stri miniri 'with the"'areathen reclaimed followiri'.coal;.,removal: Site ex'loration'revealed ,coal..'mine•s roils :com osed,;of sil sands;":`clays,`'coal'; g - P _ ,fragments,extended to-depths of.-1`0.to;1'8�feet,below''e'xisting,surface'grades,' ' Detailed,'descri tions of so'1'•conditions encountered are4summ"arized on the:test2pit,'and'testrborin .1'o`s.attached in ,, P �. ,P.,, g -g. 'A' endix'A.;,,Anarrative'descri`tion'ofconditions•observedat'the test-trenches excavated:b G;old,'er Associates;:; PP P ncluded with;their reports attached in A endix B. - ' ,December 17, 1997 `Pro'ectNo. T-3453 2.3.,." Groundwater'`, . We observed'groundwater seepage;'of varying intensity at Test.P,its TP-L:through TP-8-with the:.exception.,of Test Pit TP-S.'Thesefestpits Were excavated in January of 1997..,No,'indcation,of groundwater'seepage was;:observed ' ` at:the''test_,trenches excavated by Golder Associates, Inc: in,August of''this,_year,„,-We,observed. groundwater , seepage'at depths varying.from'two"to ten feet below existing.surface grades: The:seepage was-occurring from" 'more,pervious soil zones Or the weathered rock horjzon overlying relatively impervious-strata of unweathered .sandstone or siltstone;:As demonstrated by this study, groundwater seepage levels will,:fluctuate on a.seasonal ` -`acid'annual basis. Higher levels of groundwater:seepage would be expected-during:the wet winter-season seepage.levels diminishin or.becomin `absent in'the`dry:summer;Months. gg 3 o GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 3.1, Coal:Mines Thereis'-bothsurficial.evidence'and,evidence;in"theliterature'`that indicates that cal mining activity,pc and,adjacent the subject site':--W'e'provided'apreliminary evaluation`of this activity,in our.referenced"February 15;: , :1997 report:'.'"'Golder Associates;,Inc. was retained to performa'more detailed assessment:of the:possibility for abandoned mines;to_=exist on. the property:` The'results of.their studies were summarized:in IWO, reports dated August 22, 1997 and November 26, 1997;both of which are attached:in Appendix:B: , _ . The.results of the:'Golder Associates, Inc studies;indicate:that mining.activityon,the:site primarily occurred within the western ,ortion''ofthe;u "er'site;'The,'miriin ,that'occurred'.removed'a.relativel ""shallow coal!'seam::,;:: P PP g Y Coal: -; r"esidin�° a roximatel 10 to. 14 feet:below, surface:grades using=surface.:'mining techniques': .Once,the, g PP. Y - existing. g. _ coal.was-extracted;the area was reclaimed with the excavated spoils: Test'Trench.,No', 3', which was-a'400-foot' . ' , excavation.north„-to, south;',across' the site, delineated,the approximate;eastern :extent of,these>surface',mining activities.:Thee location of Test Trench No;:3;.was,surveyed in;the-field,and is shown on attached Figure 2 _ At Test TrenchNo: 1;;a mine.opening was obserVed-ata_,depth of about:8 to`14'.feet_below.existing,,surface;grades., n l • edthe n ,-of the.207-foBlack :As reported''-by_Golder Associates;"Ic.;this trench-probab y encounter' _ remnantsotlong'`Blc River.Mine sloe. However`Golder Associates, Inc:indicated''that the slope.was:mined in an easterly,direction''.:" below:the elevation of the;upper coal-seam�,as:encountered at:Test Trenches No: '3,'7,and,8: Therefore,:-it was speculated that there was.a potential for a"second'lower seam to.exist at the site Golder Associates,'Inc: recommended;further.investigation`at,the,site by`;drilling;to determine;whether'a deeper coal seam than the ong- that_was observed,in these`-trenche`s existed: - -'On :December. '.1.1 throw h�December .=15,- 1997,,:Terra Associates, 'Inc: ,followed: Golder`=Associates, Inc:'s {:recommendations and drilled three-additional soil test borin s at-the`site:.`Borin B-2 was drilled to�a:de"th"of59: feet;specifically'_to;'determine:if there was hich" could' have economically extracted by driving;a tunnel from;west.to east'acrossthe site:•-`The,resultof our;additional'exploratioh,itevealed; ; no such second dower However,-at Test'Boring,B.l;which, in the area.of Test Trench No: 4 and the existing sink holes;we observed what appears to be'•remnants of a mine tunnel in the form of timber'and coal debris: This material was encountered"at`,a,depth of appr'oximately20 feet oraf roughlysite Eley: 50. =Page No:4 :. December 17, 1997 !ProJ'ectNo.T=3453 • • The mine,opening observed at Test:Trench No.,1 was at approximately site Elev:54: We:believe that the opening observed at=.Test Trench No.::1 and conditions observed at Test:,•Boring'-B-2 represent shallow:prospects•which' were terminated.when •it''was-.determined that^a minable coal resource:farther available: `Subsidenceo ,eastward into'the`site was-.,not'. . bseryed in thevicinity:of Test Trench No 4 asaikelyrelated toahe collapse;of this shallow mine workin �; Based on the results of the Golder Associates,Inc. studies.and our•subse_ quent exploration,we conclude that there ,are undocumented mine:workings'.which extend,from't `he,southwest to the northeast alon ng•_the.wester portion of • • Ithe•.upper site..These workings;.arelikelyabandoned prospects and;exist_at-a°relatively'shallow;depth of 20 to 25 ,`feet below existing,site grade (Elev:45 to 55) ,,There:is a risk that these relatively shallow tunnels:could'collapse, resultingin surface sink holes,if not miti ated.-This risk�would;be presenfalong'the parking and�'drive`areas west g of the structure.'on the upper site as well as,the extreme northwestcorner of the structure: Proposed grading,,particularly in the,central and.southern portions of this area of.the.site will require excavations ,; • ': of,14,'to,30 feet below existing surface grades.'.,,These;excavation-depths are'equivalent'to or extend below -previously mined,depths at the site as indicated,by our studies It is likely any mine workings-in this area:will be.uncovered.and•reworked by the planned grading.' 'The exception to this occurs in the'area of the existing sink':' - holes near Test Trench No;•4 as•shown on the Exploration Location.Plari,;Figure 2...Here, minimal grading of less than=two feet below existing surface,grade will be required to'establishdesired construction;elevation: • , • To mitigate'the risk;pose4•by undocumented.mine workings below this area,of'the:site,:'we recommend that this •''area also be`overexcavated,to alminimum'depth Of 20 feet below current'site grade with:grade;then'restored.With• . -.-, suitably compacted structural fill as describedin a subsequent:section of this 'report. Alternatively; deep dynamic compaction (DDC) can,.be used to consolidate.the'soils'and'collapse:any undocumented mine-workings': DDC consists of dropping:a heavy'weight generally.'on the order of six`to"ten tons using,a large crane from a height of about 30 to:50 feet:`;: The weight is,dropped-at the.Same:location--five to.ten'`;times to consolidate.loose fills,at . • depth Given the expected shallow workings,•which;maybe present.in:this,area,,theenergy delivered by,the;DDC ` • .• wold•alS6,.be expected to collapse„any-undocumented workings Specific'details for application ,of DDC,at the • 'site•can•be provided if this;option is:selected. . , • 3.2 Stee,"p Slopes r As indicated by,our,exploration,,the'site is'primarily underlain by,competent,soils,and weathered block.',`Existing ' • Slopes'on„the`site,.Which range in;inclination-from near-vertical adjacent the railroad cut to the southwest; to 'gradients,'of-2:1-south of the upper site,were noted to be,in.a'stable Condition With no-indication`of previous or . .current landslides;or.slope instability:_`The:.near-vertical`cut at the`southwestern portion of.the site was'faced with chain-link-fencing.to contain material falling or eroding off of-the:near-vertical. cut. •.In our opinion,provided'. ••:1'recommendations contained'�-in .the,followin ;:sections of this re ort','are'-,followed�'.site:.grading: ro posed gp • . _ � g. •,. g. � p ,resulting in'cut`slopes•varying froma:,l?:to 2:1 would remain stable,and would notimpact_thecurrent-site'stability.: ;. or that of adjacent properties,: - • r ,Decentber 17;;1991. Project No. T-3453 :: 3.3` Seismic The'Puget Sound-area.fallswithin Seismic'.Zone 3:,:as classifiedby'the.Uniform;Building:Code•(UBC) :Based",on' the soil`conditions encountered.arid the`'local eolo ,from;Table 16.J_of the UBC a site:coefficient.of 1`:0 should _ g gY , s _, be:used:in design of the buildings: Withthe'com�-etent'nature-of the'.native'`soil'and cock which,underlies the site, there_would be no risk for.soil.liquefaction related impacts to thestructures or;as`sociated:utilities; ;J'. 4:0 . DISCUSSION AND'RECOMMENDATIONS - 4:1; -General t , . Based on the results of our-study;it is our opinion that there are;no geotechnical.constraints.which would prelude' development of the.•sites:as proposed., However, mitigation:to.eliminate the hazard associated.:With previous mining;;activity,as'discussed-,in:the coal mine hazard section of this report will be required within the western' 'portion`of the-limier;site:- 'It is recommended that m this itigation;work, occur,concurrent with- the start of site _ :gradingactivities: Extensive.excavations wilt:be';required at both;sites`to.achieve'desired construction rades. Initial soil's excavated,, from`:the sites to>depths`of.l0;:to15 feet-will consist of•layersof silty sands, clays,:silts;:and'weath'er`ed sandstone. ,It is::also:likel :.that largeboulders bi:fra ments'of intact bedrock.will:be,encountered•at excavation'de' the of 10 to l5 feet,below current side grade.')Below'115 .to'20 feet,:hard sandstone, associated.with':.the,Tukwila formation, will=be'encountered: The;soil"s contain a significant amount'of fines"and will'.riot likel .be,suitable:-.for:use as structural fillduring wet.weather-conditions.•. Therefore;:we:recommend that-mass:` radin °activities at'.the,'site.•' only-be contempIatedduring r the drier summer mohs(June through'October In'addition the radin g�Contractor:nt ) g. :':should.-be.prepared to`use,_hard'rock-excavatin techni ues 'such,as:`ri' er:claws and::hard formation teeth' to'` achieve;the:desired.:construction elevations For.the.'lower'site, which`w llrequire excavations of 60'.feet below:, :> existing: grade, blasting to`facilitate excavation of the hard,Tukwila,,sandstone formation::may need ,to be ''conside'red: "'The following sections-of this report:provid'e'detailed recommendations pertaining to.ahe aliove issues, as..well:as : ' I other'geotechnicals:desgn'considerations. •These recommendations'should be incorporated into the,-final::design' ' drawings'and-construction specifications: . - 4.2 Site Preparation-and Grading; :To. .repare';the sites for construction; ,prior'..to",excavation and placement :of fill,material;'it:will=be':necessa to strip.tl e:organic surface layers.:'an'the existing south and,western slopes,aurface`stripping'depths,of four,to'six inches'should:;be.'expected 'to remove.the 'organic to soil.;' Alongthe:lower flatter - ortions.Of the sites, site explorations indicate:.surface:str`.ipping depths of one to two feet Will be,required. cthese soils:willnot be'suitable' for use'as structural'fll,but'.can.be.used.in.nonstructural`landscaping areas: December''17, 1997`. z'Project;No:T-3453 Concurrent:withlsfte excavations =m ti ation workto.eliminate`the= otential risks associated"with undocumented• g P . mine workin s'inithe'western` -ortion"'of the:upper site.should-be Y,'.P,roP� - ' g p' pp undertaken:�=As`d'escrib'ed;preyiousl - radin".activi � in the'central and.south,'ortions'of'this.area,,,of the:'site`should extend,.-to de th e uivalent:to oc g g tY P P >q ., below'the:depth of the mine"workings as-identified by our study: However,,within the north portion of this area of. the site, additional excavation:approaching 20 feet below existing grade:should,b'e'plan`ned`° `The;approxima'te limits where'this:.overexcavat on is'recommended for the purpose of�miti atiri the'mine,hazard";is shown on the,. ,P rp �- . ,g-,..:g. Ex loration:'Location .Phan,'=Fi ure`'2.. .Once 'excavated, uncovering;suspected;:mine;workings or ;competent. P g bedrock material Ithe Cade:.can``be restored:usin structural f1L`'; As':described earlier'van°alternative;,to this g . g' . ' rover . ._ excavation and'refill`• rocedurewould,be,the'use ofDDC: '''` = f Prior to. lacin'`''f ll''materials, stri ,' -ed"'sub' r'a des,:should..be, proofrolled:-with.,heavy:constructio'n, equ'pment.tto: determine ifany,isol'ated"softand,yielding areas are present..'.If such.areas are found','and they cannot be stabilized and laced`by,compaction,,the affected-soils should b,e overexcavated.to fritt bearing and-replaced with.structural fill',/Simi'ar:proofrolling should be performed on native'subgra,a, which will provide.direct"support;for,rbuilding or pavement construction: = ,The soils at the site'contain,•a signifcant amount of f nes and, in our opinion,,would'not-be suitable for',use.''as structural f ll during"wet,weather rconditions: ,Therefore;'we-strongly suggest that grading'-.activity .only',be contemplated during'.the drier"'summer.months Junethrou h October)',-'In;addition,:,given°the:fines"content"of the. ':„ soil:and the presence ofweathered'bedrock,fragments of siltstone andrsandstone,a sheeps foot.:compactorshould` 'y be used to compact the structural.fills.-, _ - ` 1' ed during_ the,.wet weather season or if'the r.are=initiated in d.. .weather_,and':extend '. :`, If;grading.'activities are p ann , y, ry , into the winter `.ou:slioulde:be' re ared'to,,im ort'a';relative)' clean``fee-dr.;ainin` it'run:'sand.and'gravel`•for use as structural:fll Im .ortedymaterial_for'wet.:weather: radin .0 "oses should.meet.the"fol"lowing requirements P g, g_P.rPr - :S.-Standard Sie 'e Size PercentPassin� - , •U y .. Passing - -•� No::4 75'maximum orfin' wetr "eather structural:fill "be iveri fo amendin :native.soils`:, As'an alternative to�imp g ,w _ b,. g , • Which^are,unstable,due';to excessive moisture~usin ,Portland'cement`or,kiln.dustr.'These'-additives, when:fluxed,;,' uniform) with.the;soil`'reduce the soils' oisture content:and Lenerall --`'roduce`:a;,w.orkable-:and'compactable mil.. , / . .. g YP material.,When:compacted,.the cement or kili dust continues'to hydrate with the soil,.:improving its strength and •"`y "decreasing its com ressibili. .:'If'necessa soil amendment of`this nature.can'al so'_be;considered• for g, P, tY „ trench back'frll,soils. - _ r Pa a No:7 e er, `Dec mb 17 1997 Project No. T-3453•. • Structural_ fills should`be placed''in=uniform:loose lifts'not:;`exceeding;eight inches and then:compacted to a minimiim of-95,percent of•the.soils'' maximum''d , .densi }•`as.determined lip,,ASTM.Test Designation 98 Standard'Proctor The-moisture content of the soil:at•the time of comp action should be inihe range-.of 1,41ns minus two,percent of,the soils':optimum moisture;';as`determined:by;this-same method.; Innonstructural,areas,': 'and:for Utility'trench backf ll;below a'depth of four'feet, the degree of relative:com` action Call'be reduced''tQ^,9Q,'z 4.3• , Slopes,and Embankments •• -_ • • Fill'embankments;should-be`graded with a finish'slope:inclination:of;no''steeper than,'2:1:`'Fill mate"rial:used to' . `construct,the:embankment should'be:placed,and'compacted-as,a`structural fill, ,as':described, in°the:preceding' section:,Where th'e fill will be' laced,on:existing'sl'o-e. ,adients,,.in:excess of 20-'er'cent it`should-be•ke preceding, P g P �' P. . Y benched.into,the'nativesubgrade:as shown on attached Fi ure3: ,. g g Finish':slope."surface;'should'be-frmly`compacted;trackwalked;•and appropriately,vegetated to reduce or prevent; erosion.-Surface.`water runoffshould,not be allowed to-flow in san uncontrolled fashion.:over the crest of.the slope or on`the slopeface.=-'`If"surface`water is;not,directed"awa-:from-the slope=it'should.be..controlled in a;swale'and`, either•tightlined:in:`a closed,conduit4down the slope face or in an.appropriatelylined'channel:;. Finish;cut,slopes'exposing competent-bedrock of the Tukwila or Renton formation can be laid back.at fn sh: inclinations •of, l•:l,to 2:1.,'';For.near-surface Stability considerations,:whereh,the slope;.gradient exceeds'•2:1; we ' recommend the slope surface be covered with;'a.,,Permanent-erosion`control and stabilization geosy'nt m lietic,materialp We`recomend using a -material, Such as,Enkamat'S or: equivalent, Which' to=the slope surface accordance'with the:manufacturer's,:_recommendations:,, Once;this=material is placed, the•'slope-surface shouldlbe.';: h dro'seededwith'a-h ydroseed"mix'a pro riate for theslope,•i clination. 4:4' "Excavat ons l - in; All site excavations;must be completed. accordance_with local,state,'or, requirements: Based;`on'the, ' current Occupational'Safety:and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations;-near-surface materials and existing disturbed mine spoils would be'categorized-_as a,Group',C soil;: Accordingly .excavations"within this'm'aterial.'. which extend`.to a depth of greater than four:feet.should be.`laid back_at'an„minimum inebriation-of.1:5:'1 .'In our opinion,,.temporary,excavations which extend,into:the weathered bedrock.arid unweathered'bedrock can be•laid - back'at:minimum slope.inclinations'of l:l to-1/2::1,respectively., The:above information;is rovided,solely;for the:benefit of the owner and,other members of'th'e ;ro'ect should:not be•construed`to imply that Terra;Associates;'.Inc:,assumes.responsibili y.for job,•site'safety.F , Job-sitesafety is the sole responsibility of the project general contractor:„,':::, Pa a No:•8:. g December'•17, 1997 Pro`ect No:-T 3453 '`~4.5" Foundations. 1, The-building Ma -be:;'su n"orted;on;'conventional spread'-foundationsi bearing:on' competent native soils or on, ; structurat fills placed`above competent native soils. Foundationsubgrades should be prepared as recommendedin the Site:Preparation:and Grading`sectton'ofthis.report: °i?er meterfoundations exposed to the weather`_should be, a ,minimum''depth lof 1�5 .feet .below:f nal exterior, grades., Interior,foundations can:be constructed-at`_any convenient depth beloixi the floor.slab.. = " Ve recommend,'desi nin' foundations:;obtainin su., ort:ort cpm'etent:native`-`soils.for a net:allowable:bearing g g g PP 1? g capacity.of 4,000;psf'':'Four dations bearing on structural•fill.should'he proportioned:for'an"allowable bearing of 2,500 sf. For..,sh'ort-term;loads,'such'as wind'and seismic,:a�1-/3.increase'in this<allowable.ca ac,ity~can,be used.. -Wit-the:'ex"'ected`buildin`•' loads,:and,these,bearin '•-stresses'.a '-lied;.the''estimated`total'settlements:fall'in'-the... .P - S g PP. range of one-half:'to one inch, of,which 1/4' to 3/4'inches w•ould-be-differential n,;nature:':The greatest magnitude of-differential''settlement,.would occurVat the:transition from;'native b,earin soils`to,structural:fill. 'If se uired,'. 'foundations's annin this:transition,can:be stiffened to'resist"this bending : For.'designing foundations toresist lateral loads,,a base;frictions.coeffcient of .4, can_be'used. -:Passive earth. . ressuresactin' =on'theside`of=the footin�`:can also,be:considered'. -We;recommend-'calculatin� ',this�later resistance' �P acting g _ , g usin `'an„•e'uivalent'fluid wei h"t'of 350 cf We•recommend-not`including,'the`up er 12 inches of soil in-this , computation because"they:can,,be-affected:by-weather or;disturbed'by.future grading,activity,,,Th'i's.value ' ; the.foundation.will be,constructed.neat,against-competent riative'soilror bacle'filled:Twith structurahf 11 as described ins the Site Preparation;•and`Graditg,section of-this report.' The'passive value recommended,includes'a-,safety factor of'.1::5. • ''4.6' Slab-on-grade,. ` Slabs=on grade May' he,supportedon the:sub$rade prepared as recommended pi the Site,Preparation a _ rePort:.:Immediatel bet*the Poor Slab,.we°recommendPlacia8..a.four'inch.thick ca`illa' }break' la er of';clean:,free-draining -'sand-or ravel'`that:has less"than`three ercent ` assign the:.No'.-200 :This ater mreduce .. . ,.. ,.ial'will;reduce:tl e:'potential:.for'upward capillary movement of water:through the.'underlying' soil:and= subsequent wetting;of the floor.slab. , Moisture can 'still'`,be' transmitted through the'-floor :sl - g ali, iy',vapor.transmission::: .This' can .be zparticularly troublesome,for:floor coverin 'adhesives:' 'ro uard a`ainstthis'occurrence where necessary, 'a'durable' lactic: ' '. . ' - m°embrane;shouldbe laced,on'the.ca illa• -break laer.`-The membrane'should be:covered-(with-two inches of', ,P P, ry Y - �. 'clean"moist sand'_to guardaa ainst damagedurin .construction:and.to aid,in`curiri .'of'the.concrete.: S g . g . g - g - December`17.1997 ' Pro'ect'No: T-34'S3 S,ubsur ace We'recorrimend installing perimeter`foundation drains below landscaped.careas adjacent to the structures.-.Where: -'pavement-extends,to the"structure''perimeter and positive:•slope is provided away from the;buildmg, we,do not .believe.foundation drains are.necessary:' Drains,`where'=installed,-Triust'he'.laid'with'a gradient sufficient to_�promote positive''flow`to a:controlled point • approved discharge; 4.10... :Utilities - Uti`li i-�es should.`be:bedded.andbackfilled,in:accordance;witli American•Public V,York`s Association,(APWA) or• —" tY P P _ - - !17 Ci ;of Rentonfs pecifications:::AtVminimum,'trench backftl'laliould be Placed and'com''acted.as structural:`fill as, • °, described iit the',Site Preparation'and-Grading section_of this report. .As-noted, soils'excavated.on-site should.be ' suitable-for,use'as'backf ll,-material'durin ' d.. 'weather:;`.However.at::the time of our stud 'the:soils.':moisture' _ g -ry �, _ Y, content;appearedto;be above;optimum::;The'refore,,drying_back'or other means to:condition the;material'may-be;'-.-;;. • "necessa . ;to`<fac.ilitate:, ro' er'.com action. `I _,utilit constructions takes':'�lace'duriri ,:the.,winter, it=ma -be.', r ry PP P f tY, P g- Y necessary,-to im ort'suitable•-wetweathe fillor.amend native soils for utility'trench backfllin 4.11-. Pavements • ,; As a`'means:to 'reare a.stable.sub� rade''and avement base`we recommend,usin ca'soilcement a' lication: The - P P stable ,g. _ P - g PP soil.cemerit or'cement treated base; CTB ean,be`constructed.usin the native:soil`s,observed'below the organic surface,la. ei:,;We recommend scari ing the top,'12:'inches of the sub 'rade'.and;then:blending'in:Type`1"Portland`" Y _•. fY b g Cement at a rate of 60 pounds per square yard of surface area.'2The'cement, hould"be blended'uniformly with the soils, with the mixture also m'oisture,conditioned as necessary. 'The,sorl cement°moistureshould.be within-=1 to +3. ercent.'of o timuni,as-determinedb `ATSM Test Designation D-698' (Standard: Proctor);prior to compaction:, P P �, Y Once blended`and conditioned'the.`Soil cement should:be compacted'to.a:minimum`of.95 ercent;of its maximum, density as=determined:b --th'is.ASTM standard. ". _ Traffrc:at the will mainI -consist of cars and,lightArucks,with Only'occasional hea traffic,in.the'form of tractor-trailer:rigs;;and.:trash''removal vehicles We recommend^'that the pavement section:constructed,over the 12; , ,- inches` CT of B,".consist,Of'two inches of asphalt concrete (AC) The AC.should meet WSDOT,specifications for "-, _ Class B'mix. 5:0 ADDITIONAL' SERVICES >; ,` Terra Associates,s-Inc: should•.review the-.final.design,and,specifications.:in:'order;to.veri,"-`:that :earthwork'.arid'.. foundation recomm endations have'been' roper-l''inte reted,and'incor �.orated'into projectdesi 'n. ,We should also,',,.,. provide:.geotechrtical services;during'-construction,-in-;order;to observe;compliance with:the.design•concepts," specifications,'and recommendations This will also allow for design changes.if subsurface,condition`s'differ`from those anticipated prior to the start of-construction: '' • ' December 17,,1997.. _ -_ - _Project No.T-3453 • 4.7! , RetainingQ`Walls. .. ;,:The'ma nitude of earth ressure.devel0 nient_on lower=level Or retaining walls.will;'artly,de endron-the . uali �' , ' ,, : _ g P ; P I? Y, �P, q t3' - of;the,'wall''backfill:•�,We.recommends placing-and compacting-wall.backfill:as structural fill.; :.To,guard,against-', hydrostatic pressure:development, wall;;drainage must also be installed A typical recommended wall drainage ,, '''detail is shown on Figure:4: - : :With' Wall:!:backfill.; laced and, compacted:'as""recommended and;drainageg �ro rerl installed; We'-'recommend ', '`.'., , <.= P p, -P P .X: designing unrestrained;walls~,for an,``active 1'earth pressure'equivalent tot a'fluid-weighing;35"pef'''-F,or;retrained walls''an..additional'.:uniform lateral ressure:of;100.' _sf.should'be';added.;',These'values';assume,a-horizontal 'backfll condition-and,thatno-'othe_r.surcharge''loading, such'as;traffic,or`sloping--ernbankments •will:act on'`the wall:; If such conditions'will_•exist, then,the imposed;loading must.be-;incl"uded;in the wall`design.:-.Friction:at.the'' `" '1base of foundations'and'passive earth-.pressure:will provide resistance to:these;lateral loads. 'Valued for these.. ', `parameters are provided,inthe Foundations section.of this report 4.8' Rockeries. i; E a ' xcavation`s.al"ong the'south,and east,perimeters'of the upper-and,lower„sites,:respectively,'should expose dense'., Renton' or Tukwila sandstone.'-,:These conditions•:would,be:suitable to face with :rockery 'construction; to a:. ; maximum height of-eight 'feet,,''=Rockeries shouldd',be•constructed.by an;.experienced rockery:contractor; in : accordance.with the:Association of Rockery."Contractors guidelines: '' `,_The excavation,-a:long the east'`pe,rimeter;ofthe biofiltration;swale•-.is expected,to encounter\disturbedmine`.,spoils ;` along its northern;portion. These soils will not.be;suitable to face with rockery construction The fill,should be; <.,remoYed'.aridreplaced with:structural.-fill that:is reinforced-with eogrid,_.A.gener 1,;reinforced:'fill/rocke section :;:,,;;;„_=.-,:i;:::,. is.shown on:attached Fi ure.5. `` 4:9= Drainage} 1 _' Final exterior`g radesshould��romote free and "'ositive drainage-away from'the site:at;;all.times: Water must not be .- ;, . . allowed".t .. ,. f � , ,. .times. ,. . , �., p in the immediate building;area:.;:We recommend-prow o.:�and or:cohect adjacent fouridatioris;or=with'_ , - - a.gradient_of.at..leastthreep,ercen for anminimum distance-of ten'feet'from the,-building;perimeter,:-except'in-paved,- ' locations:':In-paved\locations,'a`minimum gradient of one.`percent:,should;be;provided unless.;provisions are- included for collection'and disposal of surface water adjacent th`e"structure: -_ ' Surface:water-must. not.be allowed.to:flow=uncontrolled over the: crest.:of the';site slopes,and 'embankments: Surface,.water,should.'be directed away.from the slope:crests to a point'of collection'and controlled-,discharge..:If. . • -`. site;grades'do not allow for:'directing:Surface'water-away,from the,slopes,'then water;should,-be collected,.and - , - tightlined down the slope;facein:a:controlled manner: Page'No: 1 U ,- .December 17; 1997 Project No. T-34'S3 = 6.0 LIMITATIONS' ; We,prepared this'report•in accordance;with:;generally accepted,geotechnical:engineering.practices This report is "the property:=of Terra Associates; Inc: and'is':intendeddfor;,specific;'application-to'theNorth''40'5Upper and'Lower ` Sites ro'ect:,'`This re'•'ort:is�for.the'.exclusive`.use of gins Northwest ':LLC and their`authorized.reresentatives: No other warranty,'ex ressed:or im 'lied is'made. ' ` analyses and;reco_mmendations'presented,,in this.report'are.bas'ed.upon::dataobtained'from-the'test pits and: ariations'.in.soil'"conditions test borings'excavated'on=site::'V can occur;the nature"'and.`extent�of which`may not.• become''evident Until' construction.. ,If`variations',a ear,evident,'Terra Associates, Inc should.be.re 1 uested':to reevaluate the=recommendations in,this'report prior to proceeding'.with',construction. ',Page 6' v 1. ei a r. --^'. .± ',...E.', '.',, ... \\, S'l t24r1 1 • ST E!z: s,an v T:: 'g.-.. : sn s ela am,m -!• s,a TNtSJ .y.urns I _ - I , Alma �.�.d'•>"t-Y" ,, Si.S I2STN'sT - • ,V ik.- -, • L24TN.51 � °.n5?mm"`.,. ,' , �• '° \.4.5�,'•' ;• '<'- dlr' ',�O PARK•• �ofS LIB d� -,� sr' �, :.'S. -• .„.... .-st -, .,._;,� "uem s:' 4 .. ® .9 .,t Q-L Ls.1;s K V L W1`-"`4 - _. ., .EE,I:-..• L C... J�.'Al) „ sr !MI sr,n�i�CO,y._'-, • 5 tN S .A.,-Li�'_r '•`1, � R C.9M. A J' ,,;r- .,� y a CCU"" t,e , .A a,4 J �� i6n1 :? .t: ' � - ,p0.'.�•'. b, !fa'„•'� trn. f`N �,• ,�y '^�- .�tN•,�,� Po 2�j �`, :.1 it16T1"ot _ � �� g �, , , �' S .81 -. oy S 127rN n `( ."\2 _ <. 4i ;., '3, :"l° t ,' P'. '' s• "Ser y. 128TH I'ST' J 128TR :ST'',s. +) 3• .. b G1• •S ••/r;! ' - '6BOo• o ar rn'7zoo 76ao' �f -11arN s?h _ w • A , . esi.' ' i' .Sa 129r. ply, 'S 129TN'.,ST < - _ - 1 :`}t ,< i ' 416 i. '.St ,. �j.' �itsf qo. .S el. LAN STON RD^ t� .��,.�' s<ivTM y. .:., �II _ttt!!! 1 .SS� - le !`�:.�' s aBaa,arA' .- 'K;i►� Y�'I� '(�� �d 01, y ps�f` .. .fay -5(.• ` f�: -r E _ - _ f I .:+•' v\ GT s, 13JR0, ®.air, suro sr `�'. $" 132ND .:ST.. �''2'''... - 'i, - .�..�p .' •�,r .•NR �' r ``. 7.- - 134TH, •s. ,ri,gy,• 1:1'11,141141 STI„ ® - Nal • �2'ST41: St _,7 0141,l�,`\o—'-'`*� 0/� , .rt.., .\\ l38 Y 1'•" .RIJ9l1, : Y µ :r.,.y %- .,�. :-. - . J' 3�'.,- ,e�>+ '°�,�•.'S.'.. 5,2 < 17,. a ��/..r{ =-le_% <:;K� 4:,4/Acx wvfa ;p' .,1\ SUN ° y(�y �' - s n, _ 1L'r_, •1-ps,e., ::\\\ .��aa".Y1':, •PARUN-. cpsc�....''4?sV.`A.R.,-�. ,�g'�= :.'IR`fn ;' •� s , - :42 D N- s:H l.ao r. - '$ • - ‘Ri•'.: .ter ::+x+- .i72+P:'s1,- i 'A,• Y� `fR[D;: �o .ice'3I a• '.<', i Esau• +i -,may., d'. _.� •' \' `a'"„ , '.'' ..?S g.:. �n :',-Efi•°, , -st 5 .. '7. 1 ,MfO; - s :y1 .\\�� •�/ x�' - -, .y�i. '.R43Fi1'"�._ RFM7CW,S3.> .r�i_' ► 9a- - • 13Rp'st- :� - 74'-,•„•`'5''.. - ,.. C - Ism'd' ,,,, • < \'^ S'— 144 Iqp ..PAVirg'-,,v. a • A �t.. �• + 167 • .'s' s �• FdiT�\\\ O,r- Po. v »'.� n<' a:ri. , I - 'S'Is91N. �S. .• r+' •Q-_ K. .,7 1 � �r�'�t� ,S.R1 - ,I.9,i,- l . . - ''� = r.Q NTU'l4 z,U � 5 t50TN',Si'_ -s, .1 s.l'�M :gl - 'a�, sr' ' �` \„ .p�.• 4,,,_ � • Toif6�r.� t6t 24 . ,� 1 IMI ,I �/�s 2.. sr. , s Isz' '23, ••. - r'. /� '..., .� � �'" - - ��•n a_rrlmsr �I ` A s R;A N,yD�E-RCR�rIR•7 � 1•.� - .�I. ..y.a P_3t.eR.0.n i.Ts T� �. ,,,,,,qr. .rt,H,,.... —, _ 7 N3R',1� ® � :PKWY . . N t 1,�T a Nr R g •' �3 ` . I _ - ±1_ S ' .1t . .tN6 E a7f v' to' ,_=^. _ , I ~4°Sr 0 BALER.� 9r I I� 1• :i: ., sr ' - ': r„F ! Ii b 7I' :;''c : :?tiv a -- &-• s .'s Ti*:+ MLL - - r..: .r;m,., . - =�., • ,. .. - - y wt -'- --,„...,A,.,...,,,:-..:, ` • : _ -,. •'� ilsrSt,9 ' ', • • si • ' • -' . 31F''?' ~ `f�''',► .��� ,�• ,., 'im :,, :y•`w..< e,.'. s _- ., .'' ignbs 'Cr. RCK INp _ d c_- - S 16iiN`si • .y Iu;' t a eXIRfCEYIER"PLA !' � rL , '' • -� • .I N E , 9is ; , _r., : , �• ., . � n ` ;. ST n.}.. ="26'' ,�. .^ P< "9�yRW 5' E .;.::a,;t, FSy..A,[. S:P. 30, ,.� ._ 4TcS"168 r. ✓x4 my ;.:-.e✓/N,,,m, ii` / - •_' v _ , 1'- _ Ai 6 j` l; ; `- / -Ali - , , - , . ,; m..:✓' - fi1„,_ 54 ' I '.i wT'.:.:•7 Zi• 3 S," 'P., ,,,,Sr.;--r. -i ...f= �-? 1!-ram.-a•• •- - &' SS '+-:_ �CORPORAT- 5 181 °��.;..,:.sk• `��••t - . lis - ... ,,. .., .. .._,_::,,.... sr� B I:- _ ,,,,: . .. s., ar2no • pi. r : :. ;,tdRraRAT_ :,' sr' TM - yT„ — Si' rl. '"N ilf, - a9�N• It II; _ •- •r•' Jr SST. �J �� 3BTN - : �PARgdY Yr .� "1 - — mr �.' vuii —1r 2,• ,. r w ,�.z,M - - s e:�e •�N S - wm' - 39 r` REru7[r_ - '7 . - • f',w O� :P 9" :y3a q -- ��_ •N -- � '115T' ,. ''r I'-;••''Jtl ....... ..... ... •.•r,': 'i , .'tt�:: I � REFERENCE:';:,;THE^THOMAS;.GUIDE;..KING' COUNTY, WASHINGTON; PAGESii655. AND;.656,?1.998: EDITION. ' -.: ICI IN Ap'�- le; V N M T TERRA - NORTH 405'- UPP ER'''AND LOWER. SITES - RENTON' WASHINGTON ,; .\�v. ..•: .ASSOC:IATES 2'; . , , , , I Geoteckinical .Consultants Pro' No:- 3453 ;Date- DEC:.1997 f i ure,. '1. • • • . ...\\V " . . ' / I I• _ EXISTING BUILDING i ' - • • t \\ ,I?/' - -_ „Jill wreac. •`\\' - - • , �i:"=__ � __ ___ - - _ _ I • - - /:r// — — --- -_ Vim: -- .PARCEL,.•,- . ,):I,, ,r7.,,tws---....r..7.7,77...- - . - ,.. , Mil : , , ,i,: .. ,, .c: , - , 37-5" • \ • � ? te /• 1. „ / , 'I - ' _\ . .p/ /.. • \ \ \�. i /L.., J�: -_-s{• F[i4-off T� •.ei �- — - '•• :1 ! - - - ' _ - -\;,♦ ,� ;\ , : f ./�.. 70 -5- r APPROXIMATE ,SCALE' , • ♦� ,\\t v � .' ,.',' '.-. AI1E j �'\ •e'ZT `1 Tau..., : it �- • * f •�7- o: 150 0 '_ 150. 300 • \,,. ,. `,`,;-., ,l .,- � +•r ;-,, � ___ �r,��, - ;a% � - w'•i• feet. ♦\•,,;� �- �� :�_-= _ - • ,\ ',:y,, '`�1� to -- '.i _ - i • 'rill Ir -, --„,,,Ns ♦ \ _ �' iJ\. `• /` 11 ,,. CONTOUR INTERVAL ,\ / d '\ feet I,��t / Ill �_i` .w- / / It 4.i r Y' / I i t h. , '.aat'c,®seal. •r II — k lmlwvr rap - _ —_ �� �� - . _ - • • •• - \♦ \•,\ i/ _Ir,/ �r•ill,•^,^Ill 7. I r f jr `•: :.\ / //-- / + i ,� :\ de urmo11: , 1 it• f l ▪TT5 , �lF• •t• f • \ i LEGEND:' , • \ • \ ll •\, ,: �• \ 'B 'i, iii, .'\' / t , - / •i ': PITS; Y..•. • • ',/. , B TERRAASSOCIATES/ • IATES 1 97 \` \ • , ram-- / ,;;;.,,• / 1, '1:- v• • \ \� /.n� •r 'i r♦• � \ 1 Y - _ 1'1� !i I,II rrs• If TEST=�•:.•: "; TRENCH BY�G,OLDER:.:AS SOCIATES OCIATES- 8 '9T' 'G PIIQI',nl Y'%% \ S • r, t E' •J \' ; .\ / � � / tii'lliliv ll . / --- ,�\ .,� •\'. \ ��, '� ,• TEST BORINGS "B � .�, /, yam" •,� Il, ,;;:i - � .,, Y TERRA ASSOCIATES °12 97 , • \ //// / •/ i,,,f if 1'IL'1pyr., �11 , '\.\•, ,� \\^`• �\ ,' i •/ - -� / `) - .v / • r S, / V• 11.1 11• i �sy[ \ / \,. .\. • // :Ill t \'\ \' II 7�`' - i: \ • H -•sy• • • l 1' ._ •• \ \ \t♦. _ I( :„,„ql' ,llt,l .,`' b' - •• t I t t, C` r7:••,,r: s 1 �,% f, f;'i:::r;,;:r:r;::;;::::a:;llii; . .� r,:�i i /• ' REFERENCE:` \�"\`�: ;iis ;(.. ;;,..,.1 - - mbwre�[airw.+ar 1 t \ ;R_ ,•f - '. '' - ,, .• - a . { nr,,,,,,,Aiti,: k - „I ,( , ��€`� A'"r: / , SITE�PLAN �PROVIDED.�.BY�GOLDER ASSOCIATES.: - • •• .. ,,▪••\ , it 1• I'll,'f 1 "Ifilhiiii - , •'1\ i 1 .! ,_ • iii- _9 r I.' JOB�'No.' 3. ' r.:-...,.....-...-..:'.' -...- .'",:.,., �� „I.I•,,,: :.\ '97 1212 PLATE :4' DATED'' 11 ;97.-- '�' •.\\\\•,, ♦ .r/rt:••?'t,,;,t II��r1tV•` `\\\',1I:�' /0,6.i�C/ ` "l r / - _ _ , vf. z. .u ' .r. • \ , 78 %\ , i � '' •:r^�-- t'f-:7.:`--�• .•,��`c.ti c;Sri:' '�l `;' \ • • 1 _ - -, (•. • \� • \• ,`,•,1-, ` r \•`•``�l�li',AN','"lit ' ' ` . - r , - - , \.. ` , - \ °_=�- ,,), EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN rk k� - • ,- `. �' TERRA ` NORTH 405 UPPER AND LOWER` SITES' `•`� �'�R �� °�Q\\\ RENTON WASHINGTON: ,�b„,�j� ` . ` . ASSOCIATES _., :: , ., ` • • otecHnical Consultants �� Proj. No.,3453' Date DEC. .1997` .Figure 2 • NEW STRUCTURAL FILL • MAXIMUMNS,1‘11 SLOPEGRADIENT:T• .. GRA EN . ` 2:1 H:VY , •— ••• 2 ry • % .. _ - �' -®®,�� tip•• :.1 •,t ` ;EXISTING.' GRADE � i 1 . - ' 11 - � i I. •`7.'. •' ,. , TYPICAL BENCH - - MAY REQUIRE SUBDRAIN IF SEEPAGE • CONDITIONS ARE INDICATED i GRADE AFTER THE REMOVAL OF • TOPSOIL AND OTHER.LOOSE SOILS KEY CUT AND TOE DRAIN 4":DIAMETER PERFORATED PIPE ENVELOPED ; ' IN; 1 cu:ft, 1/2" DRAINAGE'.GRAVEL . NOT TO SCALE NOTES: . 0. 1. SLOPE-SHOULD; BE STRIPPED OF TOPSOIL.AND UNSUITABLE SOILS PRIOR TO PLACING ANY FILL.,. '2.'"BENCHES':SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 6 FEET WIDE. 3. "KEY'..SHOULD BE ,MINIMUM .2 `FEET DEEP AND 6 FEET WIDE, EXTENDING THE FULL LENGTH OF THE 'SLOPE FACE., L. :4; FINAL SLOPE FACE `SHOULD BE :DENSIFIED BY COMPACTION. 5., PLANT OR HYDROSEED; SLOPE FACE TO ,REDUCE EROSION POTENTIAL ',;" ' 6. ALL STRUCTURAL FILL.SHOULD BE COMPACTED TO 95%`.OF SOILS.MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY PER ASTM,'D-698 (STANDARD PROCTOR): GENERAL S LLOPE F ILL' DETAIL TERRA NORTH , 405 UPPER AND :LOWER SITES RENTON, \WASH,INGTON .ASSOCIATES � • • • • • Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No.3453'. I Date''.DEC: 1097,1 Figure: 3 - _ 12" MINIMUM' WIDE' --•-- . FREE-DRAINING GRAV EL • SLOPE TO DRAIN ' • . , ,_ • 1i.i • � • : - ,.' �,:.. .' . ' ••�- EXCAVATED' SLOPE ki'..:1' •: . .(SEE- REPORT FOR , _ ,APPROPRIATE; INCLINATIONS) -:-• 1' • COMPACTED" STRUCTURAL ., . - BACKFILL , I ' - < : N' . .\ :ItO 12" .OVER THE PIPE - . '' "' • 3 - BELOW-"THE PIPE ' • - 4 DIAMETER PVC. •{ ; - - ••PERFORATED PIPE • NOT . TO SCALE i , . ,-RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL, ' ;':.,',,.: TERRA NORTH 405 UPPER AND :LOWER SITES •� . - RENTON WsASHINGTON .:-,ASSOCIATES. , , ,.,jam • eotechnical. Consultants Proj. No. 3453 •1te DEC. 19971 Figure 4 • • i. Swale for surface drainage control`'. • . A' 'IiEF ee•e•e�.tee•�• Mia i5XT"iTGeo rid: or_ ; :y::i:;r ;ie roved b > i»:<:::]::;:>::; : t;>i s3+:;. reinfo. m :::>:: : ::a<s>>is<t:. a tts's':<<i>>;: :;:i:';� L, t, r,e e _:::::>::Gseeoetercehinnifcoarcl inE ineh eard.i':r:;:u>e>:s:>.:;b a;e:l;o:iw `-::::::><z::ri::: ::: .. ,. e . : i`:i ::::: ? T : : :: :.: .. .... .. .• ._::-:;:•::-::; > �::: :::,:,:: :.:::::::::.::::,::.::.:::..:ye. e :s: ir::,.:::;?;`!: ';s; ; `: • • •• •e-. `.:'::#:s::::>2.:>:;a�;:;:i:�;i::�:t�i;::;=? `= : :..:.. { ii� �::i:a:::;:`;:5>::s::::siii::>�:i.;�:5:�:=,;::i:i:::;&.:,sf;:�;>:.a:>fi; .;; sr :;;;:;irs::� :i:�s;;:;:.:;;::i;:;:n::.`:;:,. .'.,' ''.. .1...' ' ' ' .::' '492 : '..' '''':'‘.. : - 4 ;. z': s.„...E £`:;.;;:, £` ;? ;r:;:sS;mf,:z„s; `; ,f,,. x„::;;z ;:;`;��;;. • .• • • •-^_-�<>:: 3a::::::.:::.:.:::i::`:sai�:::::::•:`:::':?k::.:;;::;<::::as::;:Fi::::::i-: ::<:-��:3::e;::�:::iFia:s»E:Ss::::=:;i:: : :::;:;;>r:.i::::::-': .•,.•.•••..___:.:.:Com acted Structural'Fill er::::::::s::;.<<:>: >;: >:::<:: ' ' . . ' 'r' ''': .7:C7 3. .:':: '' '':''.'' ..' ' .'' ' ' ':. ' '.:'''r: ''. :. ��e.e.e.,�,_- ._.WSDOT..2. 03.3(14)B and.C::::><:::::::.:::::.::<,:1,.5 >::>::;:>:.:;:;>:;;>;:::>;;;»;>::;>::;;;: . . . / -_� :::::.,:::::.. .�::::..::::.:•.:;:ss ::,::8�::::: i:�n::�::s:;;n;::�;a .&i::k:;:�::; ;�;;::{:r;;;:�:::,<:;::;r>;::z;s:::.::;;a;e� ...;,!„.',;,;..!..?;.!::•!‘..:.:i.,:.':::.1:::.i,?:.,;:,:il:..l„..:..:...:,,...:...i:,..:z.,i.,.i.i;,,.,,/..1,,.:,..;..:...:,,.•::,.,:::, :;; ..i:..: :. ; y - shed rock filter ::::,:;.:;:::;:: : „, , ;:,::::_.,,::::.. e • o ::.:..material , be we `2.:;'<:'<:;:: :;:>:>:; ::isa;;;ia:.;::.:::::::.::::.::.::.:.:.: ::)--f---).':.::,::;::r..-:..;:.::;\.:,.-:..\:.-..:..3::-:,...:;:!::'"li:.::i.,:'i.........:\:.',.r..,:..';:.:...::l.j..'''':l..::.7...H.:,.::.i.'.:.....':.:....''... :;......_...1.:1:.:.:.:i::.:._ ..:....:;:...,: :,:_::..,:;:.,:.:;,..,,'.:l.;'.,2..::.,",..:;,....;.„.r ::;„:.i.,..11,•:1,.:•.f;...::.:'::.;:.,.:'::i,:.....,,:.;:..:;.......i:.,::„.;;:.:.;.;..,.....,..:.:.:::i,_.„,..,:.: :\.......;";\.:'..::l.;.:'.I...I."..1.1.,.:,.:.s..P.7..7,....,:1... ;;: ::,:;„.' .:;,:...::: 1 ' • • • o. ._..._.. .....and- 4 inch size.< ;:;:_.:<:::.;;::;>::::<:c::;;::::.>:;s::::::.: :=::::;;:s:: :' '. � ., - e-• • • .�__:_'-��:Yz�::�:::::::.::.:::::<;::_;.;:.:;:.::::�;:=;3:::;:�.'.>:::•:n:esr;;::::::::�:,::e�;::::::::;::::=::,::::: ::::i ::;:'.:`.:i::>S.`.::Cir::::;.::::.i: - - - '�, ice..-._l. •..- ......... ..,. _ J 7 ,H' 3 ............ ............................................................... \` ' 18 in]',. min; ./ % :: ,. r. \ .;\. �� .,\- i///_••: : •;-�c Grade'.at• Rocke face - �� 3 in. min Firm undisturbed - . ., •'.l: 12in. soil to 'be verified , b Soil En ineer Keyway min. 4 'in.. minimum diameter. Y 9 ,:. drain•,pipe, .surrounded by'. gravel .meeting Ih'SDOT Keyway should. be sloped - : 9-03.12(2),,"specifications '. `• down -towards'the face being protected • GEOGRID REINFORCING,SCHEDULE Rockery Height NO. of 'Grid Layers Grid `Length .(L) . - 4, 2 4� 8'`. , , . 4 NOT_ TO SCALE NOTE: Penetrations through geogrid for installation of guardrail can be" made: '._G,rid should be exposed sand cut cleanly ' ,and. not .ripped, 'torn:'-or pulled.'by..action.of dnllicng,auger: Cut.dimension; should not .exceed"'12 inches: REINFORC,ED FILL/ROCKERY CROSS-SECTION �_.—r`.'. .,:: :TERRA NORTH 405 UPPER':AND.'LOWER 'SITES • \\``�� ASSOCIATES .'RENTON, WASH. Geotechriical .Consultants Proj. No 3.453 Date DEC ,19'97 Figure 5 - •, ail .• �. .. - APPENDIX A, .. _ FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY,TESTING North 405 Upper and Lower Sites Renton,Washington. J We ex lored subsurface soil conditions at the site.by excavating eight test pits nsing a rubber-tired back hoe on, January 22, „1997., Subsequent,this exploration,'additional test pits were excavated.in August=1997,by Golder Associates, Inc: under- :a subcontract with our firm: - Following r ex.their lorati ec through p on •.on D ember 11 December'15, 1997 =in'accordance with Golder Associates, Inc 's recommendations,,we advanced three soil test , ,borings using a truck mounted drill rig. ,Test pits excavated at the site;.both by Terra Associates,.Inc:.and Golder, ,-Associates, Inc. extended to depths of 10 to,.18 feet'below existing-_surface-grades: Test:borings,were drilled to-` depths of 16 to.59 feet below existing grade. The approximate location of the field explorations are shown on ' attached.'Figure`2. Logs for Test Pits TP-1 through T'P-8land.Test-Borings,B4 through B-3' are presented on:', FiguresA-2 through A-10: A;description,of soil.conditions encountered at the test trenches:,excavated'by'Golder • Associates,Inc. is-summarized in narrative'format'in their reports,attached in:Appendix B.' • Engineering geologists;from Terra,Associates, Inc: and Golder Associates, 'Inc:,conducted the'field explorations.: ., -and classified soil conditions encountered; Our representative:maintained a log of each test pit,'obtained; representative soil,ssmples, and observed other site features pertinent.;to the proposed,,construction: . • S All soil samples ere.visually classifad.:m accordance with Unified'Soil Classificationystem (USCS)'described on..' ^ Figure A-1'. Representative soil samples obtained from Test Pits'TP-1 through,TP-8 and Borings B-1 through B-3:were'placed inr closed containers and.taken to.:oulaboratory for'further examination-and testing.. The moisture content of each sample was4asi measured and is_reported:on_'.the test borings and test pit logs:, Atterburg limits ''evaluating the . ' plasticity characteristics.of.two representative 'samples were also performed These test results are also recorded,. on the test pit logs:opposite the:-samples.on which'they Were performed:.'Grain size analyses were also performed, on three of the samples,the results of which are shown on Figures A-'11,,and A-1-:2. • , • LETTER , MAJOR DIVISIONS :'r..-' ", 'TYPICAL DESCRIPTION` SYMBOL, Clean GW Well-gradedgravels;'gravel-sand mixtures,•.little,or no • GRAVELS ' Gravels..' fines cn ag•°' '�less than" G ' - Poorly-graded gravels,`gravel-sand• mixtures, little'or. _, 50% of'coarse Silty gravels,'gravel-,sand-silt mixtures 'non-plastic , I • o a1 > fraction is, Gravels GM a5 , , , larger,than, No. with fines 4 sieve Z , E '�_: GC. Clayey.,gravels; gravel-sand-clay,mixtures, plastic fines: • g.N Clean,:, - - C_ `n SANDS Sands . SW Well-graded sands; gravelly'sands, little or no fines: " less than .•.. : . _ ,. `._. ; . SP' Poorly=graded sands'or,gravelly.sands,•little or no"- c ',More than 5%° fines) fines. - Q �'•� . 50% of coarse Q -_o fraction ;is SM - Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures,,non plastic fines, ' , Sands U � ':' •srialler than': � • - :, .. ,. :: .._ ' ' •No: 4 sieve. With fines; • SC . "Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures, plastic fines.' 'Inorganic,silts,:,rock flour, clayey' .silts.with slight' ' co cc. SILTS AND"�,CLAYS ML plasticity: g:niO clays of low to mediumplasticity, lean day).` E o a :Liquid:limit is:less,:than`50%: - _ , Organic silts,and,organic clays of low .plasticity:. 6 Z < . ,M E-I Inorganic silts, elastic: ` a) SILTS` AND CLAYS , m CH :� ' � ., ` Inorganic clays of high plasticity .fat'clays. Z w .. Liquid limit-is greater than 50°/a. = �-, OH Organic'clays:of high plasticity. , HIGHLY,,ORGANIC 'SOILS' " PT : Peat: DEFINITION OF. TERMS•,AND SYMBOLS - • w '.-Standard:Penetration.,,- .s :. . :_ , •'. ,_ - _ ,�; _,. ., , - Density ' . Resistance. in 'Blows/Foot SPOON DIAMETER SPLIT - • ,,. _ I SPOON:SAMf?LER• ^ ' ' �? Vey loose' ' 0-4 — 2.4" INSIDE DIAMETER RING SAMPLER Loose : 4-10' 1 OR SHELBY.TUBE:SAMPLER ' Medium dense 10-30_ . f z Dense' 30-50' 1'- WATER-LEVEL (DATE): - .. . rY.• . . . -Tr TORVANE READINGS, tsf r ' Standard Penetration P ,PENETR OMETER READING is f �. Consistency Resistance ,in Blows/Foot DD DRY'DENSITY,pounds per cubic.foot I Very " 0=2 so'soft LL- LIQUID' LIMIT, percent Medium stiff' 4-8 PI PLASTIC INDEX , .Very stiff 16-32..'-. N STANDARD,PENETRATION, blows per,foot" UNIFIED: SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM : ;NORTH..405, UPPER AND LOWER,SITES ASSOCIATES, RENTON,'WASHINGTON' Geotechnical Consultants - ' Proj.' 'No. T=3453 • Date,DEC. 1997 Figure A-1 ' Test-:Pit . No. TP-1 Logged by: KPR Date: 1/22/97 _ Depth • USCS/ -Graph Soil Description OL TOPSOIL/FILL:= Dark brown organic sandy SILT,very soft, moist. CH :Light gray-brown, mottled"CLAY, fractured-with original laminated - structure,stiff(qu=1.5tsf), moist,medium plasticity, 37.1 5 /�/� Light.gray,-mottled silty CLAY with siltstone and coal inclusions, J CL stiff(qu=1.5 tsf);fractured texture, moist, low plasticity: , , 35:5 Black COAL,fractured,moist,very soft. 1.. 10 /Gray very fine grained SANDSTONE,.widely-spaced fractures, highly weathered, Soft, Moist. _ : Test pit terminated at 12•:feet. -Light and moderate perched groundwater seepage observed at 2 feet and - 10 feet,respectively:' NO caving., , Test Pit No. TP-2 " Logged by: KPR Date: 11/22/97 Depth USCS/ Soil Description , � � . � • ' '- - OL'sM TOPSOIL/FILL:' Dark:brown organic silty,sand with few gravel - , inclusions and".occasional buried wood;loose, moist. • 33:9 . _ Mt Brown; mottled sandy SILT,with clay,stiff(qu=2.0 tsf), moist, low plasticity:` 28:1 - ' 5— Gray-brown silty very fine SAND with gravel,occasional cobbles, -; - and clasts of highly weathered sandstone;very dense, moist. , (Glacial Till) SM.. ., 10 16.0 ' Test pit terminated,at 11 feet. Very light perched groundwater seepage at 4 feet , - No'caving. 15 ; TEST PIT LOGS ` 0`1���� TERRA " 405-.NORTH UPPER :AND-LOWER SITES RENTON,:WASHINGTON ����. ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants Proj. "No. T-3453- Date DEC:' 1997 Figure A-2 -Test :Pit .No `TP-3: - Logged by: KPR Dater=.1/22/97: Depth :USCS/ Graph Soil Description, , , ' •• ::::::'OL :::::,:, TOPSOIL: Dark brown organic clayey silt,very soft,saturated. :' 1 ' -2/'I% Gray, mottled silty CLAY,fractured,stiff(qu=1:0 tsf),.,moist,. , CL , i ':low'to medium plasticity. 35.6 ' Brown to blue-gray; mottled clayey SILT With occasional organic . 5 fibers, laminated/ve stiff to hard u=3.0 tsf moist' medium LL.=59 '' MH' plasticity., 45:6' PL=35 , ' ' - - - ' ' Gray, mottled silty fine SAND,with few.gravel inclusions, occasional , • " 10- . SM cobbles and rare 24 inch boulders,dense,wet to saturated. , . (TIl=like) — - :" Test pit terminated at 12 feet Ponded water,'at surface. , • Moderate groundwater:seepage et'8 feet. No,caving. • 15 ' Test Pit:NO.' TP-4� Logged by:. KPR '. , Date: 1/22/97,, i Depth, USCS/ ' Soil Description w - ' . , :'Graph �� � • s - �.` n n PT n n. TOPSOIL. ' _ SM Red-brown (oxidized)silty •fine:SAND, medium dense, moist, ', j.7.2 _ . i„) ) (combletely weathered sandstonel. ` -tr, Light gray to orange(oxidized layers)fine SAND with silt,dense,, M • , .;5.- :�sF•u-� - moist becoming saturated at 8.feet�(completely.weathered • 13:9, -; . sandstone).' - SP-SM". S. \ ' __=_--_ Gray,to orange(oxidized zones) highly weathered SILTSTONE, ,19.1 , ;== -<=_soft, bedding structure,occasional fractures,-moist. .., . . . 2 Test pit terminated at 13 feet.,,; , . Heavy perched groundwater. seepage at 8 feet.' '. • 15. No caving. ' - TEST PIT LOGS ' TERRA ., ' • 405 NORTH:UPPER AND.LOWER;SITES', ". � �`�O\\\� :_ , :,RENTON WASHINGTON. ` : ASSOCIATES , - . Geotechnical'Consultants , : Proj. No. T-3453 •Date DEC. 1997 Figure A-3 Test Pit No. TP-5 Logged by: KPR ' : . Date: .1/22/97 ` ' Depth USCS/ Soil.Description G ra ., W. n nph .TOPSOIL: Dark brown organic sandy silt,wet. n n , IPT�, n Tan to orange oxidized)silty fine SAND with trace ravel' medium 23'2 ;` I dense to 4 feet becoming.dense,.moist to wet. (completely • SM weathered sandstone): " Brown to orange-brown(oxidized stains)SANDSTONE, highly „ • • ,weathered,bedding structure,thin coaly:seams,very fine grained, 10_"• ' soft,moist. , 19:8" - Test pit terminate d at 11 feet. - = - No groundwater seepage or caving'observed. Test Pit .No TP-G _ Logged by: KPR ; ' • • i.. • Date; `1/22/97 Depth ', 0 Graph : = . _Soil:_Description i W- - (O to 8 inches TOPSOIL) silty Brown sil t very to medium SAND with crests of sandstone, 31.4 ' ry. SM .. 4 foot boulder'at 4 feet,disturbed texture;dense;moist becoming saturated at 6 feet.' ;1. • . _' •• • • Yellow-tan fine=grained SANDSTONE; massive, highly weathered, 15.6 _ • . - soft,moist: • 10- - Test pit terminated at:9.5 feet. — Moderate perched groundwater seepage'observed at 6 feet.: ' !- 1.5 No caving. TEST PIT .LOGS TERRA: 405. NORTH 'UPPER'ANO LOWER.SITES • ASSOCIATES RENTON, -WASHINGTON ' ' ' ' . � '.. ., , Geotecfinical Consultants Proj No.. .T-3453.; 'Date DEC:;.1997 Figure A-4. , ; Tests Pit ,No. TP77 Logged by; KPR ; Date: 1/22/97 Depth USCS Gra h. Soil,Description 11V . 0 . OL r;r FILL:-Dark brown organic silt with clay,soft,moist,~low plasticity: . - ! Gray, mottled'clayey SILT fractured,very stiff,;(qu=2:25 tsf),, LL=60' : - MH , moist, medium plasticity. ' l 28:3 PL=41 5 PI=19 - Brown-gray, mottled.sandy SILT,very fine sand,:medium dense;' - non-plastic,wet to saturated. S •ML 26.9 10' === = Dark gray SILTSTONE,fractured,moderately weathered;soft moist. • • _ Test pit terminated at 10.5 feet. Perched moderate groundwater:seepage at 8 feet.' No caving. ` • Test Pit N.o..'TP-8 :Logged by: KPR . Date: 1/22/97 Depth USCS/ Graph •Soil Description FILL: Dark brown organic silt with clay,soft, moist,.:low,plasticity, ,. , . r Gray, mottled CLAY,fractured,thin laminae,stiff(qu=2.0 tsf), moist, medium lastici . -- P tY• CH 5' - Silty very fine to,medium SAND with gravel,clasts of weathered, , SM -sandstone and occasional 2 foot boulders;dense,saturated' .becoming moist at 7 feet. 15.8 • 10 . • : Test pit terminated at 10 feet. • Very light groundwater seepage and caving observed at"6,feet: STPITLO TE GS TERRA 405 NORTH UPPER AND LOWER SITES: � WASHINGTON .T*A ASSOCIATES RENTON, Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No T-3453: Date ,DEC: 1997 Figure A-5 • Boris 9 No. B-'I Logged by:` ABIC- D 2 Approximate Eley ate: 1 /15197 • Consistency/ - . Q (N); . Moisture ,soil `Descri tion Relative Deptfi E Blows/ Content - p. ca 0 Density.. -'(ft.) . : ft (�o) Note:'Drill pad cut 2:feet below _ , existing.grade. FILL: Brown silt, scattered wood pieces ; : ' and'organics,moist: , , very Soft' . — 5 l FILL: Gray,''gray-brown'and rust-mottled - ' silt, ered=w scatt ood end-organics,anics with 8' - , ` laminations of sand silt, increasingly _ ' ` . ' Y 9 Y Loose - 1 -,sandy and more till-like with depth, moist: Stiff _ a 10 . .. • FILL: Brown silt,very moist:, Medium , Sariipled'coal and wood pieces: _20 _ . Loose- (?) —'25 . . Bedrock: SANDSTONE, gray.' , _ f T 50/4 1 Boring terminated at 28 feet:.' _ • ''" '"-Note:'Poor.recovery. _ , I . 1 ; ,BORING LOG,: TERRA NORTH 405 UPPER,AND LOWER.'SITES �`\�``�0AOM RENTON,, WASHINGTON 'ASSOCIATES` - Geotechnical Consultants g _ P.roj.-No: T-3453 ' Date-.DEC. 1997 Figure-A-6' • Boring Noe'.. B-2 ' Logged''by: ABK- _ , - Date:. -12/15197-' ; . -Appr.oximate 'Elev. Consistency%' Q' (N) Moisture ,Relative Depth. . . E', Blows/ 'Cortent Soil Description c3 Density. eft',) ft:; (%),, Organic Silt Topsoil,trace to little clay;'. moist to:very moist. Gray, gray-brown and rust-mottled clayey SILT'some dark'.oran a staining, Very _ Y 9 Y _ - .. Siff . - t Orangish brown SILTY SAND with __ . 5 GRAVEL,fine to medium;few bedrock Medium clasts, very cobbly Witty difficult drilling - around 6 feet,wet at 8 feet: Dense - , . . 33 Orange-brown and rusty'.CLAYEY SILT, 10_ " scattered pieces of:coal;:moist,1/4 inch, ; lamination bf dark brown organics at'9 Hard. - • - . feet. 50/6 Gray_CLAYEY SAND to-SILTY SAND; ` _ e fine, moist:Water pPerched at a¢out --15 .12 feet., Gray SANDSTONE,partially laminated ' with organics,.(Bedrock):.Seam of coal : ,=20` encountered.at 19,feet. . - Hard Continue,with Rock.Coring Log on next page , BORIN"G LOG. TERRA NORTH 405 UPPER AND LOWER' SITES: ,. \�� � .. :RENTON';,-WASHINGTON ASSOCIATES' Geotedhnieal'Consultants, Proj.''No:''.T-3453 Date DEC. 1,997 ;Figure A-7, RockGating - o n LogB 2 Project Feature: - Elevation ..' • • griller/Equipment: r Geoborin9 Start Date, ,Sampler/Method: Cable Tool Finish Date • Coordinates: • - • Hole Diameter,: • Rock'Mass p�. Elev. Depth Box Run%Rec./Graphic Classification_and . ;• Rating or, ,.Remarks (feet) #, `-# "RQD Log : , Physical Condition ' ;RMR .Q UCS* ' End of auger and SPT sampling:` l . Bedrock, no coring. . ' _ 1 100/55 . BEDROCK:.Sandstone,,gray,,fine-grained, • ' = soft-to-medium'hard,fractures with average;, - apparent`dip of 15 to 35.degrees;some are • coal-filled or organic-filled: 30- 2 1'00/so • • Coal from 32-to 33 feet. 35- 3 100/80 Coal froth35 to 37 feet. - - Interbedded coal and sandy Clay Y from 39 to 4`. 40/40 49 feet."(Note: 'no recovery in run#5)' 40- • Circulation loss • _ 2 from 39 to 49 feet. NA ' *Rock-Strength,Tests(in'psi): Logged by: ;ABK :'PL=.Point Load Test UCS. Uncgi8ned Compressive Strength ' , LLuu ,ROCK CORING LOG - NORTH 405 '.UPPER;"AND LOWER SITES ����� TERRA RENTON,'WASHINGTON :ASSOCIATES. Geotechnical'Consultants ' Proj.'..No." T-3453 Date_DEC. 1997 •Figure A-8 Rock Coring Log: B_2, Project'Feature . Elevation Driller/Equipment:; Geoborinq Start;Date ' Sampler/Method: ' .'Cable Tool Finish.Date Coordinates: . - Hole Diameter Rock Mass PL . Elev. Depth Box Run%Rec./Graphic - Classification and' Rating or Remarks ' (feet) • # # RQD Log •Physical Condition RMR Q UCS*, ' 50_ 6 90/80. - . , j Interbedded-coal and sandy•clay from.' - 53 to'55 feet. 55_ 7 100/80 . , 60— - Boring terminated at 58.9 feet: 65_ 75_ ' > *Rock Strength Tests(in psi): :. Logged by:' ABK PL=Poiat Load Test . UCS=Unco96ned Compressive'Strength ROCK, CORING LOG NORTH. 405 .UPPER AND LOWER SITES' .. ' �`�����. ' TERRA RENTON;'"WASHINGTO.N 1" ASSOCIATES " Geotechnical„Consultants- - ' ' Proj. No.. T-3453 Date DEC. 1997 Figure"A-9 . r,.:' Boeing: Na. B-3 . Date: 12/15/97 - : . - , ' _ •, Approximate_ Elev." , Consistency/ ,a. (N) Moisture Soii Description` : ' - Relative. _Depth ,-E : Biows/'Content - -;Density .(ft,) . ',,ft.' (%o.) . ' Organic Brown Silt Topsoil_' • • Soft"' ' - Bray and gray brown;mottled SILT; - - — hairline fractures and scattered,.; ,,15' ' " organics;,moist: ,: - . . Very 5" ' - - Stiff to Hard ` Scattered seams of rocks.and'clasts : _ ' . , " : - • silty sand,'rusty spots,;pocket.of coal; _ 28 ' : ' '• .` Scattered.coal.seams and dark- - - • ' 'I. brown,:organics'soil. ,, - . - • - .Bluish=gray SILTY SAND,fine to. medium,wet. - Dese _ 15 ' Boring-terminated at 16'.feet:,'; . - - : Refusal on large boulder. :' .,... . -•` - , , . ; -Redrilled 5'feet away-and",met'with refusal at 8 feet. , .. . - , ' BORING LOG - ;;:'; , . TERRA NORTH 405 UPPER:"AND:LOWER SITES; a\�`�. " ®\\\� ASSOCIATES - RENTON, "WASHINGTON ; . •Geotechnical Consultants. - • s - - Proj: No: T-345.3:- Date DEC. 1997 Figure A-.10_ SIEVE ANALYSIS - - - HYDROMETER ANALYSIS ' SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S.- STANDARD " GRAIN SIZE IN MM \\, \ \\ \ N. �a rn ,, o 0 0 0, o o' o o o. 'O o. O o N - 'Of ? Cwl N N�- ?OD N OD •A --O O O O • O - O O� ; W N 00 �• W N , 90 o- ,Cn I 1 80 20 n n _D 70 30 O - � D: z _ _ fi0 40 Cj. co Z. 50 ft 50 c(/) rn �` 40 60 CO - a . o G.) 30 70 m, C _ oz 2 2 20 80'- - w 7:7 p G'). - _ - Z()I � . . 10 „ , _ 90' - o 0.C-Z 8- � L/ _ 0 • i s i t 11 i I I I I I I., r. .II I I I� I i �� i i 100 .. - O' O " O.O. O.- .8 O =0 - - OOD,CA •- W N - 'b0 b1 �.W tV ''.-.�O:O- .O. O' O : p0 0 '0 0 O-- p rp ,*ZI m '.0 'O 0 _ 0) CA -P W N �.�;' W -gyp O : n :v GRAIN SIZE: ,IN MILLIMETERS.' -72 =Z Z - COARSE FINE COARSE 1 MEDIUM 1 FINE 2 -o> COBBLES GRAB SAND. FINES' oo� 1 Z* c� • m Key Boring or Depth USCS - Description Moisture LL• PL - Test Pit (ft.) Content (%) - • TP-2 10.0 SM silty.SAND with gravel cn _ O. TP-4 2.0 SM silty SAND with some .gravel , PERCENT COARSER BY WEIGHT: .001, J (n .002 .002 , . . , J 003 .003 . 0 ' Q m .004 004 - Q z .006 .006 0 N c.• ' r N .008. . . . .008. W v , w �, A1: Al .. - Z .02 .02 }- .03 .03 .04 - ` , 06 .06 200 ' _ - .08' ' _ - .1w ; . 60 0 z - .4g o' . - .6z a w - _ 1 IV, 4, • Z . Z • 4_ - 4 u • 1/4 - 6 'm 10 ' ' Z 3/4 20 —' z 1 ^ - 30'' w o - . . Z 1 1/2, r 40 ' A% "'. O �. O 2 - 60 , 0 3, . ' - 80 cna. ca c-«r N 4 ' , - 100` N , 9 - 6' m' m _ .200; 12 300' N'' n' 10 - PERCENT. FINER BY •'WEIGHT . . ,. - , . • GRAIN,. SIZE ANALYSIS :. ` TERRA NORTH 405.' UPPER AND LOWER SITES V. •• ASSOCIATES- -, RENTON;' WASHINGTON , ' otechnical Consultants Prof.,No.3453 ; . "Date' DEC. 1997 I'Figure A-12 . - -APPENDIX B _ . GOLDER,.ASSOCIATES,INC.REPORTS,- . , , Golder,Associates lnc. — _ 4104-148th Avenue,N.E. ® GOI(ler Redmond;WA 98052 V V :. Telephone(425)888-0777 . . B. Associates ' August 22,1997 Our ref: 973-1212 Terra Associates,Inc. 12525`WillowsRoad,Suite 101 Kirkland,.WA 98034 ; ATTENTION:Ted Schepper. " .. ; RE PRELIMINARY ABANDONED MINE ASSESSMENT. Dear-Ted; _ ' Please find attached a copy,of the'preliminary report written by SubTerra:Please,note • that SubTerra'are waiting for test pit photographs to.complement this report The.major concerns are: 1) Lack of.topographic control for location of,topographic:features and"test pits,etc These data are,needed to better assess"the,relationship between the:geology and.; ; to o a hic"features: 2). TT#1:found'evidence for a mine opening., Due to its elevation,this.feature' , ` would imply a deeper coal seam than that viewed in TT#5 where,a shallow un- ' , worked coal seam,situated about 10 feet below.the surface was"found: This'_ seam appears to have an apparent dip.of_approxima-tely.10 to.the'north or northeast rather than-35°indicated on the'geological;map:', 3) Features hidden beneath the blackberries.Two sinkholes were:observed near the, northwest edge of the Parcel3., The smaller.hole(TT#4)was'about.5 feet i dameter,2 foot deep:with vertical sides,i.e.,fairly fresh: A rusty,Steel,'1_inch , pipe was observed in the northern face of the'.hole:-The;second:sinkhole was , much older and longer(-20 feet by, 10 feet) with'gently sloping sides. Removal of the bush this weekend by Opus may reveal other features of:` importance. :The workhas'ar wered:somequestions'but raised a few more:ToLwould advise the, following actions; . Observe the site after the bush has been removed. • Have a sUrveyor complete a map.of the site complete'with the locations of the` ' most receint'test pits. OFFICES IN AUSTRALIA;CANADA,GERMANY:HUNGARY,ITALY,SWEDEN,UNITED KINGDOM UNITED STATES. • August 22,1997' -2 . • 973/1212 • Investigate by,drilling whether there is a deeper coal seam than the one we followed.in TT#3. 'These issues can be discussed in the meeting that you are planning for next week Please`advise me of its timingindue course. • Oh a budgetary note,the'test'pitting took three hours longer than estimated due to the . ' number of featuresrevealed beneath the blackberriesand:the:difference in the dip of ,the coal seam to the geological record These costs amount to an increase,of approximately,$700 which you were able:to verbally approve:.d'uring yesterday's telephone conversation.,":This amount added to the approved budget to date,bring'the total to$7,525: The budget must be about 95%a'complete•at the time of writing:;. ' I_look forward to your:reply after you have had a chance to review the preliminary r report'. Sincerely,, • _ GO ER IAT:ES INN ,ti Ian B' op Se r Geophysicist I /psiv 0822iMdoc - - it - Golder'Associates . . ,., Mining-Engineering . . _ Civil and Mining Rock Mechanics Inc. SLub:Terra Solid Waste Disposal _ ..-'a /r(� �` Tunnel'Engineering, Concrete/Shotcrete Technology Construction Bid Documents : 21--August, 1997 0 Associate , Golder Associates,:Inc. • '4104 148th Avenue NE : : . Redmond;WA 98052 - Re: Visual Site-Reconnaissance and Preliminary'Abandoned Mine Assessment " , Proposed Oaksdale Business Park in Renton,'Washington. ' Dear Dr Bishop: At your request,rwehave completed a:visual site reconnaissance and preliminary, or.Phase, 1, abandoned mine of the above subject site.. The scope of-work contained in our 11, 1997,proposal included: - • L. ..,Examination of abandoned mine plans availablefromthe Washiington'State Department of.Natural Resources (DNR):. We understand that,you already have the pertinent maps,.:,however, we will review'our fiche.to;determine '` whether there are'additional relevant.records. 2. ',Digitizing the most"recent plans for incorporation in an AUTOCAD drawing of the site. , - 3. 1 Retrieval and examination of`the'historical aerial photographs of the site: `4.J,.:; A preliminary site,reconnaissance to observe current conditions: ' 5. Evaluation of supplemental data and information.(e.g.,.historical,production e `ce of I for the �res n etia 'o�'to determine the of n - . . sln _ • . "ecords in our oases . p r ) . P p additional workings beyond those_shown on the mine;plans , 6: _.Planning a:preliminary;site investigation program desiigned`to,confirm or refute the presence of additional workings... 7: ', Preliminary'.evaluation-of.potential impacts'of.the abandoned-mines on the . , developable site'area.. This"scope was subsequently extended to include a limited site exploration program utilizing a trackhoe to dig up to eighteen (18)feet deep exploratory.trenches. This program was intended,to'confirm the presence-of a coal seam dipping.at 35 degrees and`striking , - east-west across the site for:input to-planning a:more extensive, geophysical exploration program. : . 8003 1.18th.Avenue'IV:'E:,, Kirkland, WA 98033`{ (206)'827-8003.'. FAX (206)889-8'150' , SubTerra, Inc. Golder Associates .. 8/21/97 Monster Road Geophysical.Investigation ' Phase I Approach As part of our.assessme nt, we reviewed a preliminary geotechnicalstudy by Terra ' " • Associates, Inc.,,.dated February;15; 1997, in which the presence of abandoned `mine, workings was noted. In addition.to the data from the.Terra report, a regional geologic map, • ;archival mine records, historical aerial photographs dating from 1936, and a detailed 1990 topographic map'of the western portion of the site, prepared by BRH, Inc., were used in completing our relimina• assessment, and the preliminaryplan of the site shown in �' ' p 9 P rY1 . . Drawing 1. - :{ Preliminary investigationsindicatethat the underground workings located on the subject. site were probably part of the Black River mine,which had recorded production during"the 1890's, but no further information or mine maps are available. Another'abandoned mine, the Diamond Mine is located to the east of Monster, road at the approximate location shown On Drawing 1. This mine was-worked from 1927 until 1931 and produced,approximately • 6,000 tons of coal according to mine records maintained by the".Division of Natural. Resources. ' Additional un-recorded production occurred_affer1890, as evidenced by the present condition of the on-site workings and the visibility of on-going:excavation.in.the,1936 aerial ' photograph: The location'and trend of caved"workings.or surfacetuts and spoils piles that were visible on the,aerial,photographs, were also identified during the visual site reconnaissance. 'The approximate location of this area is shown on Drawing4. Because no mine maps or production records were available, the_extent of the Workings . and undermined areas can only be inferred Additional information has been gleaned from a limited subsurface exploration program during which approximately 500 linear feet of exploration trench was dug ranging from,4 to'18•feet in depth. A summary of the results of • the Phase.I study and limited site exploration is presented in the following paragraphs.'. " • • Results of.the.Preliminary.Site Reconnaissance A brief-description of the site was provided in the:February 1997 report by Terra ' ,:Associates, and will not be duplicated here: The focus of our site reconnaissance was -along the western edge of the approxi,mate:150 foot tall bedrock hill that rises above the : Green River/Duwamish floodplain and forms the core of the subject parcel., The west"side of the subject bedrockhill is characterized by steep forested slopes with an approximate forty-foot.tall near vertical cut adjacentto..Bu rlington Northern railroad tracks at the southwest portion of the bedrock hill. An overgrown road grade ran in a north-south direction:along the west side of the bedrock hill from the railroad tracks to a point�about.500 feet north of the tracks. At the northern end of the road an extensive area of modified land was encountered:, This area of modified land was visible in the.1936 air photo as an,. extensive west-north-west trending excavation at this location.-This:site was also displayed as a coal prospect in a 1948 regional geologic map of the area., :The modified land. • consisted of an east-west trending topographic depression into�the.,hill slope that measured about 150 feet east west by about 80 feet north-south. 2' SubTerra, Inc: Golder Associates _ 8/21/97 Monster Road Geophysical'Investigation The depression_contained local spoils that good quality coal The slopes along the,depression contained'loose soil with coal fragments.- Evidence_of ongoing-raveling and , soil creep along these slopes was°.seen in the form of bowed and tilted trees What . ';appeared to be the main spoils pile from these workings,extendedto the west and downslope of the depression a distance-of about 120 feet down the floor,of the regional' floodplain. This apparent spoils pile was covered with heavy brush and was not assessed during the field reconnaissance. : . .a A continuation of the overgrown road grade-.extended in a southeasterly direction towards the top of the hill and a broad north sloping area that was clear of trees but covered with ? thick blackberries:. •Five test pits had been completed in this area during the,February 1997,,';. Terra and Associates study, but no evidence of the test pits could befound. .We were ' - 'particularly interested in locating test pit TP-1, which'encountered coal to the east of the - ` , excavated area:` : ; _ Our Initial Understanding of the Geology and Coal Seams . " Our.initial understanding of the,geology of the site was based upon our visual reconnaissance, data from the Terra.and Associates test pits, and review Of available" geologic;literature. In general, the;geology of the site appeared to consist of a thin veneer of flat lying lacial.sediments that.were deposited ato -,relativel steeply di iin Eocene," Y 99 , P atop:relatively . Ph Of-the 9 . . age (about 50 million,years ago) volcanic and:.sedimentary units that are part of_the`.Puget Group. At the subject site, the Puget Group rocks are represented by the volcanic related Tukwila:formation and sandstone and,siltstone of the'Renton Formation.'The.Renton : _ Formation is the host of a number of coal seams, one of Which underlies the subject site,, as discussed below. . . The glacial;sediments on the property were deposited'about15,000 years,ago during the - , Vashon Stade of the Frazer glaciation. During this period a continental ice sheet, up to ; about 3,000 feet thick in"the Renton area, occiipied much of the area_known as the Puget Lowland. At the'project site, a dense, unsorted mixture of sand silt and gravel was deposited at the soleiofthe advancing glacial ice sheet and these sediments are referred to as lodgement till..;The till,was consolidated to a dense state by the weight of the ice and typically is characterized by relatively high strength and relatively low permeabilities. Based onthe visual reconnaissance and test-pit data,"the till 'is estimated to be less than - about 10-15 feet thick across the site. Across the'northernand western portion of the site . the till is apparently-absent, as the sandstone was encountered at"the surface in these areas. The Tukwila formation is exposed in the railroad cut along the southwest portion of the parcel, and_has previously been mapped by others elsewhere in the south half of the site. This formation is'characterized by andesitic lava flows and breccia, with conglomerate s and arkosic sandstones, that were deposited in a high=energy depositional environment: The Renton.,formation conformably"overlies the Tukwila formation and is characterized by , sediments deposited in a meandering stream type environment at the edge of the - Continent Interbedded"sand and-silt and clay were deposited as channel and overbank, 3 SubTerra, Inc... ; ' Golder Associates ' 8/21/97 "Monster RoadGeophysicai Investigation (flood) deposits, as the,ancient-stream channels migrated back and forth across:a broad ' floodplain. The coal seams.represent;persistent swampy areas along the floodplain, that gradually subsided and allowed accumulating organic matter to be buried.and eventually , preserved as coal. Based on previous geologic mapping, the Coal encountered;at the site has been correlated with the Black River Bagley`coal seam. Following deposition,:,both the Tukwila and Renton formations�were folded and faulted during the uplift of the Cascade Range.: The folding and faulting caused many of the . , originally flat-lying coal seams to slope (dip)steeply and,to locally crop out et the surface. In the area where the surface excavation was.encountered,'the,Black Rivet-Bagley coal. seam'reportedly trends approximately west-north-west and dips.35 degrees down to the north. The surface expression of the,coal seam was therefore interpreted to form a line ; • across the south central portion of Parcel 3 based on available geologic data. : o ram c Pr en hin Results of the Tr ,A one day trenching,program was carried out to further investigate the site and to provide • data for input to the geophysical investigation program:,In the absence of survey control ' and topographic data for Parcel 3, the trenches could only be very,approximately located: , These very-approximate locationsare provided on Drawing I. Highlights of the results of:- . '- the trenching program are presented below. Test,Trench No.:.1 was Iodated in an'east westtrending depression thought to be a collapsed mine'access. Coal and wood fragments were first encountered et depth of about eight(81feet. Numerous cut timbers.were extracted between 8 and 14 feet and the collapsed outline of amine,entry could be observed on either side of'the trench. The approximate-alignment of the opening was similar to the line .the syncline axis shown on Drawing 1. A'second"test pit that was dug to a depth.of 14:to 16 feet approximately 20 feet - east,of TT#1 encountered spoils to a depth of about 14 ft but no;evidence of"the-mine , workings. Test Trench:No. 2 was located east of TT#1 and was dug approximately 70,feet from the south to the north on,a bench imrriediatelybelow the apparent highwall left by the workings : , , shown in the 1936 aerial photograph., No solid Coal seams were encountered„however, coal mine"spoils existed to depths Of at'least 17:feet. ,;An intermittent seepage occurred at the base of the,trench at a location approximately east-south-east of the opening observed in TT#1;.however, no evidence of collapsed workings was encountered:. Native materials were observed:in the slopes at the north and:south ends:Of the trench. Test Trench No: 3 was located approximately 100 feet east of TT#land was dug:from the property line at the,Metro fence north approximately 260 feet. This trench.encountered what appeared to be Tukwila_formation at a depth of about 4 feet for the first 5Q feet then graded into the softer sandstone of the Renton Formation:...Subsequent inspection _:,indicated that the first 50 feet of trench contained large boulders which were:underlain by Renton formation sandstone.,"Trace coal was encountered at a depth of 1,4,ft:approximately. 80 feetfrom the fence:and-a continuous 3-4 foot thick'coal seam was encountered between ' - 1 o and 14:feet deep between 150`and 230 feet from the fence. 4 SubTerra,.Inc. Golder Associates 8/21/97 , Monster Road-Geophysical.Investigation 'Test Trench No:'4 was located just north ofthe end of TT#3 in a six-foot wide sinkhole.'No ,evidence'of coal was found in"the trench which was deepened to 18 feet: ,Weak, soft, :- caving-,soils were encountered from the top.to,the,bottom of the trench., Test Trench No: 5 was excavated at right angles to,TT#3 about 180 feet'from the fence to. determine:the eastwards extent of the coal seam. The coal seam was observed;to.thin.out and,disappear in about 15 feet Test Trench No.6 was:located approximately 200 feet east of TT#3 and,was dug from the property line at the.Metro fence north.approximately 100 feet No evidence of coal or • carboniferous"materials was observed in,sections'of the trench that were dug to,depths of .: . 14 feet._.Trenching in this area was curtailed so that sufficient time was available for, backfilling of all excavated trenches and exploration the.long depression:along the ,property line.between.Parcels:3:and.4-B. Test Trench No. 7 was located.in a north south depression,located.approximately along the. north-south boundary between.Parcel 3 and Parcel;4-B:. This depression is approximately twelve.feet wide and appears to be a cut that was probably made to explore for Coal. '.Coal _, with an apparent thickness of about 6 feet was;found about 1 foot below the ground`surface 'in the faceof the north facing headwall.' As thertrench'was extended towards:the north,.the apparent dip of the top of the,coal was observed to change from about 30° south to about 10° north. Part of the coal seam had,been removed in--the base of the trench: Test Trench No. 8..was:extended south from,the start of TT#7 a distance of about twenty feet. The coal seam disappeared just beyond the crest,of the slope-grading.immediately., into yellow sand. ' Interpretation of the Data .Without the benefit of production records or mine maps it is diffcult'to quantify the extent and location of.undermined areas: _However,.we would normally not anticipate that the undermined areas would be large, as a large mine would have more difficulty avoiding a' State of Washington law circa 1900, that required-all coalmine operators to file an•annual mine plan with the state: The extent of the excavation encountered during the field • reconnaissance, and the.visibility of this excavation in the 1936 photo suggest that some undocumented work.took place after the Black River mine was.reportedly abandoned'in the ; 1'890's. The following;interpretations are'considered to be very.preliminary, -Inferred,data and information, including geologic contacts, dip, and-diip and strike directions are very.- approximate and based strictly on non-quantitative field observations. . R : I. Test'Trench No I probably encountered`the remnants of the 207 ft long,Black " River mine'slope.' There•is inconclusive evidence that the encountered slope. ! was mined in an easterly direction,;however, it,was mined:at a depth below-the, : .`" .coal seam encountered in Test;Trench Nos.3, 7 and 8:. There is therefore some potential,.for a second, lower seam to exist at the site; SubTerra, Inc. Golder Associates "8/21/97.,, ,, Monster-Road Geophysical Investigation = 2: A thin, 3 to'4 foot thick coal:seam occurs.at shallow depth'beneath,part of.the ..western 100 feet of"Parcel `This seam strikes about east-south-east and dips towards the north at between 10°and 20°. It is unlikely that this seam would have-been mined using underground methods due to: its relatively shallow depth 3. •No coal was discovered in areas east of Test Trench No.3. However, trenching Was not extended across,the marked wetland area due to time:constraints and. uncertainty regarding disturbance of the marked area. It is unlikely;that ` extensive coal workings underlie this part of the site, however, a relatively . - inexpensive drilling program would confirm the presence or absence of mineable.' • coal seams:at depths_beyond those reachable by trenching: , 4. The north=south trending depression located approximately on the property line between.Parcels 3 and 4-B is<believed to be an exploratory dozer cut and may well the"prospect".mapped and referred to in Warren at al,(1945). 5. Very soft,,caving;soils underlying developed'sinkholes: were,encountered to depths of18_feet in the northwest part of Par"cer3: There is no evidence that these sinkholes,are associated with coal mining;'.however,the encountered conditions may.pose constraints on site development: It is recommended that Terra Associates conduct additional site,investigation in this area. ' 6. ''It is likely that the-ground west and immediately,south of the depression, • including the area referred to as the"strip-pit from the 1936 air photo" has been disturbed by,mining: This report was prepared for the`exclusive use of Golder Associates, Inc., their'Client Terra, Associates, and Terra Associates client Opus Northwest,:LLC:and is considered to Joe'a preliminary investigation of the potential impacts of abandoned mines on the Monster Road Property. We trust that the report is sufficient for your present purpose. = ' Please feel free to call us if you.have any questions regarding the enclosed materials; We may be reached:at.(425),827,8003: ? Best Regards , Chris-D. Breeds President = References: Warren;,Norburath,. Grivetti,:and Brown; 1945. The Coal Fields of King County. Provides location of the Diamond Mine and Black River prospects. George Watkin .Evans; 1912: Bulletin No. 3, The Coal Fields.of, King=County. Chapter 5 contains a description of the.Black River mine. "In the north,half of Section'.24, T23N, R4E at Black River Junction, a mine was opened in the latter part`of the eighties.. A small slope was sunk fora - " distance-of 207 feet on:1pebed which dips,to the:north at 25,degrees. At the 6, SubTerra; Inc.. - Golder Associates - Monster"Road Geo h sical Investigation - p siderably, evidently'approaching:the foot"of the slope;:the bed flattened con � � ;- syncline that lies between this:point and the beds that outcrop north of the" ' Columbia and Puget Sound railroad in Section 13 No great.amount of Work was done here, but the writer is informed that what _ coal was mined was,of good quality. The;Mine-was,closed in.1892, and has remained'closed since that data:" : • ,Terra Associates,_`1.997. Preliminary Geotecnical-Study,Oaksdale Business Park:Renton, . Washington. Prepared for OPUS Northwest LLC by Terra"Associates, February-"15,:.1997: Provides a description of the site and location of test pits and observed mine hazards. Schasse, H., :Koler, M:L.; 'Eberle; N.A.,' and. Christie, R.A„ 199,4. The Washington:State Coal Mine Map Collection, OFR 94-7, June 1994. Provides:mine'map locations and production information : 7 Golder:Associates Inc: 4`loa 148th Avenue;'N.E.r j (4o1der � Telephone(425)-883 077T ®-A�soeiate ,Fax(4 §)882=5498,' s" Noverrilie-r:26 1997:' ;,, Our'ref::97•3-1212 , • Terra-Associates,Inc: - 12525 Willows Road'Suite 101, 'Kirklarid•WA 98034,:_ ATTENTION: Te:d Sche r." ..;. PPe -` RE:' t1ERIAL PHOTOGRAPH INTERPRETATION,MONS1TR'ROAD': Dear,°Ted: _ Followin "Our tele 'hone;con.'ver_sation of Tuesday,'Novemb181997,we>understand', that our'clien't OPUS`'Northwest'LL,C do'es'not wish to,.proceed_with.the`complete ,.: scope of:works:for the::Ph'ase'Il abandoned mine assessment at this tune:-These=works; : we're detailed in-'a chap e'order dated November3�1997'GAI,1997 .':Iri articular; OPUS does not wish to`commit to'drilling a borehole:to,investigate;the;potential xistence.of a second coal.sea t'-on%the.site._ Accordingly ,:this letter.re�"ort details=the., • 'tasks'com'leted to date:-and �'resents:the ana'1 sis of the aerial .hoto a lis P 1? Y P g� P 1':. SUMMA'RY OF 41W'ORK TO DATE The sco e''of works com leted to1date'include:, P P. Phase I 1:: ':Examination of abandoned"mine:'plans avai'lable`from the.Wash' on;State De artment o f Natural.Resources DNR' 2: Digitization:of.the most'recent plans for.'incorporation.in an AutoCAD:'drawing'of 'the-'site. 3.' Retrieval;and examination of the historical aerial• hpto g ra" hs:of;the;site..' photo P 4. ',A rel minas. ''site:reconnaissance to:observe currant''co,nditions = :5: '•,Evalua'tiori'of,_su` lemental`dataand`information.('e.g.'h sto.rical roduction records). 6. '' Planning;a�prelimina'ry-site investigation.'.program designed toconf>rm,or.'refute:the. • 'reserice`of:additional workin s,. "• 'P ' g - r� . 7: Preliminaryevaluation of, otential`im'�acts:of:the.abandoned'm nes'on;the developable'site=area . sr- - ,,8.' .Limited site ex loration'utilizin a.track-hoe.to;di ei hteen;(18)`feet deep: exploratory=trenches::The' ro '-,am•was:irite'nded,''to`confirin'the'J resence'of:acoal'' seam di i'n 'at a roximatel� 35'de' rees.to the north'and strikin."east-west across'' PP g . 1?P Yg n g OFFICES IN'AUSTRALIA:CANADA;GERMANY;HUNG-ARY;ITALY;SWEDEN;UNITED KINGDOM;UNITED STATES _'" = November`26 1997 • • . the:site for'.in=ut to.the: 'lanriin ,of.a=mor'_e extensive`ex lo'ratiori', ro' am'utilizin ' P. eo•"h sical or intrusive,methods. . g P .y. . . The Phase'I exPooration rioted in 8`'abo.e ,revealed'a thin.3-4ft: thick coal seam'ben 'ath -,part'of'the western.19b feet of Parcel A:�a:k:a.Parcel'3 TT3)and soft cavin soils'iri`,the - no`rtliwest.part of Parcel A(TT4): The located'seam'stri es east southeast'and dips between 10 and'20 degrees to the'north: An'ex exploration-trench dug .!a � ^•�roximatel 200 feet'east of'the located;coal seamdid'not encounter:coal:=A second trench TT1 ,du in-a' :hollow.on'the hillside',on-the northern edge'o£'Par,cel B (a:k:a:Parcel-4B)found;evidence' foi,a.second"coal seam located';approximately 40.feet below the seamdescribed above.. :The:preliminary abandoned:mine assessment-re`orts should.be read:.in`Con'unction°with . this doc'ument(Golder;Associa`tes;1997, Sub Terra • .2: PH'ASE"II 7 :2�1. Ori nal The original objectives-outlined'inthechange order;for Phase II'_were-to delineate suitable for construction,areas'that should onl ,"be-used`'for.' arki `and.areas'that, s2.hould''not be developed based solely:ori.abandoned mine issues:!This.was to be; accom lished=b fit' '`.,T • 1, Adding;features:(liiiildin`gs,:earth.movement-and waste,pi from-aerial photographs to 'he -Drawin'gs of-the site to:better"understand the,histo : of the.site:' - 2:' `.Drilliri 'one or:two`:lioreholes to investi�-atewlether a second':• deeper"and workable g, g -coal%seam.is located within the site:'boundaries: 3. `Com letion,of annotated phOtOgraPhlC plates of the test.trenches-for:incor''oration in a.final,repor = - {' Pre 4 aration:of,a final:reP ort-and recommendations:for_pro osed.buildin' locations: P P. P Items 2 and 4have;not-been'authorized"b.-.the client"at the time"of'writin 2:2'. Annotated- `loto ra h's of the',test trenches Annotated". lioto ra =hs of the_testtrer ches•du b .-.Sub Terra;Iric:are ncluded'with P g. P , t g Y . report. "".The informa'tion7obtained from;these,'trenches, ras detailed in the• 'relimiriary: abandoned'mir a assessment:report presented:to:you in August. Notethat the'locations f the-test,trenches:presented in-that.re ort;were•based.,on measurementtfrom lines;and pre-date the'detailed:to o ra `hicsurve :com leted in°late.:.October.' The' S - P,-g P, Y . P 4 = updated.locations;of the-test°trenches can be seen-on the-attached latest ' The trenches were excavated'to""confirm tlie' resence a'ndrstate;of a coal seam',d in degrees_to't'he.rriorth.''They were not'dug or logged=for-tlie purpose;of'soil,. characterization. : - GoldelAssocictes November`,26;1997` ;, 3<,.._ 2 3 Surve -controh' Following the submission of-the'preliminary, re or pt;;all�the:blac-kberres were cleared, • ' from`Parcel A:,Thisallowed•a'_walk-over surfe inspection of Parcel A and'the ' • plEement of test trench marker`flags for the'planned•to o a "hic.surve Durin' this: • walkover, the;only extra'features of interest'noted:were:.' 1: A wall footin .denotedb'�'a,sin (le line, of.r g y, gred''bricks 120 ft:'west,of.1T4.` d'2. -A gravel.trackrunning:West'froin Monster,Road';:approximately'"100''ft south:ofj • ' .northern-mostbourida .of.Parcel.A:` Y ' •3: Concrete:foundation slabs.adj ace it.to Monster Road.';:'_ - • Bush,Foed&Hutchins Inc(BRH 1997 su lied,A uf` ( ) pp oCAD;maps detailiiig�tlie survey- , , . - confrol established at the site;;the detailedP g? P,Yto o aph .and:the�locations.of`most>'of the trenches completed as:part of(8) above.-Th'e survey markers for test:trenches•TT1 ;TT2 and T78, the.northern:end;of11'6 :and the'southern end of TT3,"'werenot picked - ' • the surveyor.'-T:he locations of-these have estimated from field measurements'and • ar 'shown.on t1ie,° bates.'=.The:locations.of the twos nkholes ari� P ... d'a wall:foun'dation.are.' 'also'shown; Note;;that a'small'iron= i`e'w3s located on,the'edge'of:T.174:. "TT4 - v estigated the'most recent sinkhole:_` - The` reliminar. . re' described' existe"ncaof:_ • P" , , ,; a mine�portab in TTl. This,test trench'was.dug;in an`•east-west`onentated;`.topogra;hic,:de'�ression that-cuts- . p p. into-the;hills del Assuming.that this`;was.a:.portal-to a coal seam,the:elevation of the feature.(6. ft),indicates'a deeper;coal seam;a 'roximatel 40 feet the-coal-searTt'? � pP. Y. viewed in''1T3. ,Without a bo ing,'we can-make no comment as to'the qualit . of-ari coal" Y Y • ' in,_this'.seam or.whether-it would'have been economic''to=mine:, ,3A_ AERIAL INTERPRETATION:WORK Introductiion, }. -.To better:understand'the develo pent historf .of=the.sit_e'the:aeriall.. hoto " P , , --Y. , P . graphs:of thee; .- •- Site-for the years-1936,1970and•1995 were scanned into acomputer.:These date;were ' then'inerged'witl the AutoCAD_"survey Map'sup lied by,BRH: Tl e.best-fit•results are shown in the`followin late I?' Plate T. -'1936=aerial; hoto fai h.,overlain;t site' 5la1-il' - .Plate:2. 1970 aerialphotograph overlain by-site plan ' Plate 3. 1995 aerial photograph overiLain bysite lan' By,best fit,we mean'that the relative osition-of;the aerial hoto'ra p h'to the survey�data' een;obtained:by stretching:the_scanned photographic:images,-to'optimize their fit.. has`b ,relative'to the 1997 topographic data set This" rocess entailed:makin. :some-. assumptions about the positions of Monster.goad,;the rail.tr,ack and other'Other features: • ' Golder'Associates November'26 1997.;' 4 - 973=1212' owever,the final'fita ears to effectively'Match:the ..errors`in PP. Y. Y r Y . matchin the' hoto ra should,be of the order,of several feet: _ 3.2:,. •The D•iarx o d:Mine. • _ -.This`•min e was Tocated.east of`Monster`Road.. _ • I, A digitized copyof,the mine ma 'su lied b:;tl e-DNR was overlain on to'the=•1936'i 1? FP,. Y,,,, . aerial photograph`:(Plate:1,features`labeled.-•m-).:,Note:that this=photo `ra h',was taken. four years after'the last-recorded.workings:in the Diamond mine;(DNR'1997)'. A•h'ouse and an eiltrarice•'way, (labeled bunker in the,mine,plan),;were'matched"to-corresponding -:features''on the,T93o.photograph.' 'Fittir g,the.mine'ma to the photo a` li'usiri''these J' .. . . , , ,. >. . .' , _ • , ,, .., . ' '' E hown:.. � P .,_ g? P' P' features„as reference;poinfs;prod'iced;tl e'resul s in Plate:l:-,°It-is interesting'-to;note'' ' thatthe,mine portal;digitized from the mine•in'ap,correlates'well with.the''end of-:a linear feature'{;:of-similar orientation;'located,in'the.photograph:`Thi's.`feature is : •jiinterpreted=as'theapproach.cut,running down.to the mine.portal.';Th_is same incised • feature is still evident on the 1970. hoto a h: P $?..P. 3 3: Features'In Plot A'and B - 3,.3:T: 1936: hoto ra h:= ' he;'site,:• 'It'shows.cultivated-field'above aril This is'the earliest�aerial'.photograph.of t _ below:the.stee ;slo e.e,,se• aratin""`Parcel A from Parcel,B:,,Within''Parcel'A,:the , P. P- P g hoto ra h;reveals;two major vehicle tracks,ru'nniri east-west f roin Monster Road,and :one minor"east-west vehicle#rack'to=the'south -The:rortherri' air:of;tracno. `a; ; collection'ofu largest of whichi s n dPhaseI • ; . ; • Plate•1'indicates•that TT33"runs ". d'e ::. alon, the',eastern:e d`ge of a:mar-k`•e'd'chap e.ii-wth-ie t, materi`als.-To the east,thesurface�aPPears uniform fined boundaries,'indicatin a h - , cultivated'field>or �'as'ture.,'Westof this line, and'eastof: the: -age'of the hills de,the`surface.is,dark andiatchy indicating a'mixture.of `` uncultivated: ve etation arid disturbed ound. The.two•sinkholes`are'located'in'this ( g ) gT i area:"All'the areas.of disturbedground:are-therefore located west.of this`,trencF�: Tl e,incised'-' ul'1'.'is'ri'ot visible,in'this hoto a h(TT7)although clear'on;the 1970 y g Y 1? P photog '� raph",(Pl°ate2): ;This indicates•that the gull inter retell as;a:pr''ospect.-trench inthe- reliminary'reort was•dug'after:the'1936_photograph was taken:' One:hundred feet ea'st:of:T"T3{tl ere.is a ronounced cut:in the Hillside', shown by,:a`' shadow :A'few'feet'east of"this,to o aphic.feature,which still,exists'.toda •�,,•arel•'tw0. arallel:features which'indicate that the',crop,,,;shown'by the east west-closely spaced` :lines,is ro ',mor e: ''oorl :'iii`.this` art"of;the:field:T'l eSe:features are .inter retell as'. the influence'_of:the,foundations."from a large p`re-1'936 b:u ld•ing:.'Foundations;can:cause this•effect'b, ':reducui the,soil;cover,alteririg,the l'oeal:drainage and creating soilswith - Associate's! 1 November 26, 1997:'' • 5' 973-12 12.: • lower moisture and nutrient content:The brick foundation:structure'-at the'north''end of •' '-,this feature,(noted:during,thewalkover survey)may be related to artof.'this structure. The•hillsid ..A ,1Y P, • e that'separates,Parcel A and B;shows'•lobes of material interpreted as end '-ti ed mines oil S readiri down'the;side of,the;slo .., Most of the surface'of these'' l?P P ,P. . �., g,�. Pe�; . lobes shows significant vegetation which would indicate some years of latency since.the' - bulk of lthe`spoil was deposited: However,there appear-to be several areas'of.disturbed' • ground( oorl vegetated) which would.indicate more recent mining.activity.. - 3.3.2. 1970.p•hoto`graph. • . _ The Diamond Mine;buildings are not evident on the photographs'..Some of the '.• • topographic features such as the feature interpreted:as:the approach cut are still-evident. , The bunker,road has-been`widened and extended towards what is-now the'Metro: works. :This road"appears•to'pass over the'mine:portal." 1 . All the buildings in Parcel A have been removed and the farming has assed,to;- asture.,,.. ; Cattle tracks,(shown,inwhite)run across the:field and down into;'the old mine Workings. The central east=,west track is still in use.'The photograph indicates that the building that , , ;must have occupied-the foundation slabs'located`_adjacent;to Monster Road must=havebee built after•1936 but renloved•before:1970. : = As noted,in 3:3:1,the ull TT7 is..clearl visible in this p hoto � Y:( ) Y. � graph:^ : ,••. . The laridnorth ofParcel'A'and.B - has'been re-graded;with:the construction of a'railwa spur and buildings:. • 3.3.3. 1995.photograph... The"-Diamond Mine site has:been-completely,'re-graded,an&no'trace remains of'the.older,: • • mining related features.' Thetop of the'hill south of Parcel A,is now fenced(METRO):='Vegetation. blackberries have encroached across much'of the site as the land has fallen into,rdisuse and,away 1 from;farming. 'There has been further,development of the commercial g :buildin s to the north Hof both IF parcels, .' ` The hillside on`the so,uth,western'side of Parcel B has been-cut'back and re ` - �., .. .. - graded. � ., 4: • D.I r SCUSSION� - - - The:aerial photographs:cover most.of•"the changes.in land use'betweeri•1936 arid.the • I _ present day. ,The history of this use appears`to befairly completealtlough the building. ;Golder Associates. November 26,;1597. 6 .. r _ _ 973-1212 ..,•.adjacent to Monster Road (Parcel:A) was not photographed while,erect. From some of 'the surrounding artifacts present in the field,it is likely that:it was a small farm. - . ' ; The incised gully;in to'which.TT7 was placed.is`not evident on`the.1936 phdtograph,' which would:indicate that it Post•date -the photograph.' All'the:remainder of the mining related features s oilpiles,strip` (;p sfrip mining, tracks etc.) present in the 1936 photograph are - ,.. 'situated,west:of TT3: East of TT3 and west of:Monster.Road,'the ground appears to have been,used only for farming ; ' , • The study has.relocated the,survey plans for the`Diamond Mine with some�de '4 degree of confidence: None of the recorded workings underlie the sinter - , `This letter should'be read in'conjunction with the preliminary report'produced.in,'`, . August(GAL,1997).''At this stage,a full Phase II assment has not .�,..r g ' (� bandoped mine asse ,been completed'because of the potential for a deeper coal seam beneath Parcel A. We trust that the report is sufficient for;your-present purpose. ... Please feel . .. , ., ; free to callus if you haveany questions regarding the enclosed materials:. We may be-reached-at"(425);883-0777 - Sincerely, -GOLDER SSOC TES INC.-•" Ian Bish Y `"/i1.D: Senior ophysicist • - David:P;Findley).- IB/DPF/ta . • 1 f2Fibt.do�. .. .. Golder Associates. November 26, 1997 References i . . BRH, 1997. Topographic survey for Opus;Northwest:-Oakesdale Ave SW&Monster.Rd, Renton, King County,Washington.Bush,Roed &Hutchings,,Inc.,21st October 1997. ' DNR, 1997."Letter dated February 10th, 1997 from Timothy Walsh (Washington State " Department of Natural Resources) to Terra Associates, detailing;' 1. Production figures for the mine as reported to the Sate,Mine Inspector: . year tonnage 1927 ' • 120 , 1928 698 1929. 1,434 j 1930 3,839 1931 195 -2. ' Copy of the mine map for the Diamond mine,scale 71:30,no date. - GAI, 1997. , Preliminary abandoned mine assessment,letter dated'August 22, 1997 , - • with report from SubTerra. Golder Associates Inc., 973-1212.- SubTerra 1997. Visual site reconnaissance and preliminary abandoned mine assessment, proposed Oaksdale Business Park in Renton, Washington. 21,August 1997.. . Golder Associates SubeTerra, Inc. .:, Golder Associates; Inca 11/26/97 . . Monster Road Geophysical Investigation ,- _ . • Fti "'F ':Sit':... >.r -.. , - 5 F ki ,fir '� ty ¢ ;` i"�tka� '. , z- '%1' ;:;.! 'am' fi" , e ,` r 'r i4 134..'fth.'. 1 , Y v� 4 i . z.- `.'ire �', ax `Y� �' - , - ..,. °,.a I' , ..,4r, ac r,'�n" �r f`. , r ,a ', ; t t>a•� i"e, - • : • '�"v' ?'ak2f f S: '. '}„} r'T� 4 S} /'�`+w`.f 1`' j Y [-,.r, y , # � 4 n R7y> "f v" '"f,ti yeS 5� , f t.41 f y - �T -1, 4 . 1 :nk � s•w°ram�'` r '('��!� 3a` + ry r Fi + }: .>.+ ?`. a� t-.s4' 'sx s ,f ,.�` ',rw, S,`<�v''k.✓f " - - • - •+ F of "„4?1w S '>t,i tr NW,>7-s i. t '.y ,�," 1 ,- ,, y >J •s�; SYw '� .rry :FIi t { f f u vl' '3.3+� ' Y n 4, ; w try rtsc, t ,. e.it 4'<' 4' xr f x• G , ,r ix "tar YK.., #..;: f :% ,y� tee,S. •!� J < 4��,-"�}iS'-V��' ' 'y • , L • :if Y , Y • "It,Q, N 4 . j �_t C K^tS.� 404 f• ;'''t ek !A'' `vXfiu;•w ems- . l ,+3 + 4 '. t mac}C;y, : 4 ♦ ,/ d'}" 9 4}r *.} ; r; .. S 1wt• tut.%3-.'c ' '''''fit`xY'*ei-' w t -f �1 4 'k $S� - J p.�.t:S'C',�H.S Photo A.. Looking.NW across TT#1. Note loose fill from.8 to 14: ' feet composed of coal spoils, mine timbers:and,clay ; ' rich-silty fine sand. Collapsed,mine.tunnelis in lower' ' ' lefft;'cneter'from.11 to.14 feet:. . • t7 w3 -•^•�� . `yb - T • ^" sts+ ,� 1.- ey ? '-' .cr s 7Yil Y 4r ,,,,. „ ?3 -� 4 7e:re •4 '0..v �1 �iY ,; \* s ..' i;. R Sz. r hI a , , � <S rs i n r T s ,' 3. � � uy• +Y'` it a 'A rypa � r' '- ? {! u f _ t� t ` • , .1 -. , . - ' " - • , -: --..- '. .-.;"c;:Vg-?•541it:l....*‘,c,l'.,.;,:.,A,-.,`-•"•w 44`,;,--'‘4,,,•06re,--cfige_''',1:'ii.:i•.7,..• ' Z',2•.,•?•'''..,,A•';';'`;', s•',. - • ' ', . Y,la J r .- yZ L rh fifi a•�. -f '7 ar J i� a t i -' ,.+y 2 t ,.ta j n s 6,r 5 a.> y y `` x. . 1 3t+x ! Sty � . - f. t¢-s'r s`�'s is T"it�"+•n• n ��R�.Yi•4• �'3�Jt o• -Y"?, r T ; �� ., .,'r.• t J.:,. s "; 'xt`n.t;.itii t A,; ,f„x P: y,, , _ - r i t 'S y 4' 2" r x T,n ,r�»`�5�Rs"'�d�`v "Sy r`'- t r _ • , - :" •>,.} ,3ta•t h1 C , <r, e w- '•aria::,a ;l _'� - - "` ` } ,'V }t4. --'41 t*' '* y s*, ; ", ,I`.` n J fa t,J, .'�i' " y `3 i' ^,� rf Y 1 it a - � � k 'S r ",y !,- .•d„ '1✓,W• •' FiKt y�±, F r e � fi c ysy5�� ' Jt J RI 7 w ..Y�y s 1 . .� x .a ;• crL 3'� ., fin '�1- r 4y .1 f :>l1 r_•,�+ ! .cSv4 .� >'K" � .,. - ��`�` i cS�r. �>..r'��' ' ,*t +'.. "'"=..�Ct ''.4.�..ram.,.•h'��'.�+t>a�`•u*��;1,•"r``.;;:� t�Yi§ .- I �x,{�y3,,t;' S 1st '&;H . ." • ..1 'ate,-'• A !'•x,4 �. +. '4. 8!�, X 3aYr��'•'�a'.tf • =Photo B •Looking SE;across TT#1... Note soft, wet fill soil from • 8 to 14:feet_and collapsed tunnel in lower center'' • I. . Plate'1 ' ' -'Test Trench Nor 1 =Collapsed Mine'.Tunnel..- ' Project No. 97-26 ' . -• .-,. . • ' ' ,.,-.. , . . .- , . ,. . • • • „. , . . . . . . ,. . . , , . . . • • - . , - . , , , .,_. , . . . .• - . - . . .. , • . •, • ,• „• . .. • • '-', • . ' ' ' .11/26/97 ., • • . , • , . , ,, . , •. , . .• ., . , . .. . , Subrerra, Inc . - - .. :" - • : . GolddepeLkssdoia!esIno . „ ..., .. . , •• • . • Monster Road Geophysical._.. .. .,,.investigation. . r.-.,,... --'.:.". -,. ',':. , i•:' -,:',. . , , . . . . • • „ ,. , . . . . ..' • ' ' . • , . • . . ,.... • i ..- . „ . • • •i'f' ' '...';'::•;•, C.i .• . .'--, - ,s, , I I i r.. -' .• - .4.". -4.q-•'• ''.i.,""4 , Z-.4:',"1,6' ;,"*.;%."-"i,'"',I.-.,. $ ..,.ift ' :•,.1.• -1 . ,„ tt:: -'4"A-7r: ;r',-7.(...4.1r,t`t:•:' ' - - - ". . - • r'" :-' ."-!"`;'.1''''' +.7.'-'-in."--• • .::"6";-.:;??:,..P'4,f,.:•"";4*k,.-1 .,,,,...J.:- .4j,1 • \--.•?,:.:"....r,*.*:iii.gr'lS:.7. ,•?-4.....1,.;;; ;'t.f. ,..,;It.'1;f:P, '',44::";','.:7.4.:'•?::.:11, ,' tiii -''''....-' .k :' . .:- '.-.'"- ' '' - ' ".' • ' ., - ' , :-`,-1 : ' .. - ..,. ' . '. - ,- . - ;4:4* .,_‘&-i'Mi.-7,,?......- A 4•••-t*ci-e,`,"-",-"rs'P-"';:::+rT1-,:•. :,,.. •:"'-',4.f.4:t:;',Ukr-1.--, .., .i.-1,-, ,,.. f ,. ,. . - . . - . . y.. .,, ,•• . - ..,..,-,,,.~:;.4-•••-.41,4;.,,• .. :.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,•-.••••,-...--...7,--.-.. ..- _„i.,,,,,,,..,-,:,t; :, t.=.i., :;,•-••• , .,... „. ,,,,-.,,.,.. ,_ . ,.._. .,.•. , , ... ..: _ .. _ ,--: • .1-.',. . ,... . , . -- ..-.., ,,,,,,zej4,,,,,,347,•,...„••• . .-.,•:•-....,,;y:.::,,,,,.,..:•,,,,,f..q ..: ...,--,'---,Ar:',,,,:•, .1. -•/;•.:-.,,.*: ••;...frliA•t•••''...4,• ••• •. ' '•- ' • - •••• : -• • - 1 : ., f '- . , ' .' ,. . . -4,...,,,:),:,.r-',..4:',P,''',,:••„4.5.-;.,c,,,,,,,y4.. •••••.i,-,..,. •••- •13.::4?•-•p•,.- -. ..,.,..#-;*.,•-,, ,-1.z..1-c--•?,?-•,,,,,,--4- -•,-:•'----.-••-• • ,--:4„„.- • :, • • • . - t .„ . .,, ., '•' .:- • • '• •:- - - .• ' •- ---- ..151''' ',.,,,-.."::1-,•1,-,V...'. - - '1•••Ysi:-,•:<-,,F.':.• ••". .;-`4.--V -'•'''f`44..t '!-',.,-: :-.•..-eets•-?, ',A-10st.,4,••s•-..-tr?M17. • -'..- •,' _, . ,,, , .- ' . • ' -., ;•,-*:1,74-4'..:•i•N;.-.,w,4 -4:°•?1•%•ifit•i:!-' ,',171.1,4•ttL.,--„1,44,?"-A,,,$•*., t.ip.,:,..,, ;,7,•-?..,.,,, -c:4'.:„4,-,:.:'.*: ..f,,i'vv:Mt./.a-L-4 -, , ,, • -- • - • - - . • • • ' •' , • ':4"-_,Ub.*%-••••-.1".._'44,,;4-'j -';'*-:••;,:'••-••'''k,p''',, ,fki-,ii?;4<!?;1'•'•'• ',-.4.4.-40'..,.;,,,'7-.,4i.?•.i...;;;.:7-0••-•,'- ---2-••••;.mk;•••-.. • •• • • ' , . , . . -• - ,. • , ,, : • •!...,-i' ,- .. . - •i‘1,,,i,,.-:-4.,1•„•----tri-V.,;;;••-144:4:40. ., ot-,:-, :',;-,,.trg,:•,,?•!V!!'`-..n. ----.'"'---ic';1•!-4•:- Ay' ', t4-.$10-• - - ' ,,: - ' ' ' ',- : - .- ': .- - ;:*•,'Arzt.' .s....";'-';-rr'r.,..,-•,'74:,-'1,!,'..*A1,7,7(P:',',2rt ,`,,.....;14',-.,:-..4i,,,-"Li t;;,.,...?-:r),i.vt4:04,1- r .z,-;*,k;-• - ',.-.:.: .r;•_,• ,, - - , r . . . • • r. . r -. r ....„!:.•,1-,•-•;',..•••*!i• 414:.',. i4-,i.'.. 14,:f.:'',...N7lik,,,:!Ait'rF4'*:,,frzr-*,;;;i:?4' ---0.::,.z•11-...,4, 4 -.71,i,"''' ' ' .-- -- . ' ' ' , . . '' .. . . " 4,-,,,41':,',,,P,.,.-..,74:...1 • ..,r-,,;,,-;%•-;-- e,..,.., •.---4:„.. ,...?,-,.....,_, . -,..:., .,.. •••-•--E. -,..:. •.,•-4, ...• -- • . - .- -• .• -- -.•-.- • • - ,, ,-1. •-...4-..,,,,,,or,,,,,,, ,.,,,, -,...-,..r.--, ...,.....-,. ....2,.,-. ., ...4. k.. -r. ,r,.. ,..,,,-A.,-, ...r, ,,..1, .. . , -.- - -.'-!-' '.' ' ' .• . , ' . A;'''''''?'-'t''',14.1-%C.J-7d, rk,C.--.Z. '.--Nfie'-'.- '.'*.Yr-' ..1'•." , - A k-..S.;-'i 7..i. 1,,,,,--\,-1',-,'` • • ' ' , . • ' ' r '''t..‘..'4'''11.'s '1:'C:•:•4''' '.*;":-•.:' ''.?.i':.•'•t:! ';''' ne'''4% •4'''"er''''.'.-',.,,,.:1•C4' ' .. 4•I'f• .4.:I•-•'n Itql.21•A'.'';::;‘'...,10• • • -•2 :'• ' - • - . L ----; .- . 1• - ' ' ••. , .. • , • -, :- ''',-'4...''.:::',.1.lei.'034?-,'SOtt. i.';(t;':•• •:3,....:-.•••S..,,,..1. I•.' . ... ....1.:;144,1F -g ''''''.:'.'1.4 44',44'fr. •..•,;44• ''' : . '' :' , ,''. ' ••.••'• 1 ..'.' : . • . • • . '.i.''''''::: :.•,.;•!:;•.•ft.i. 4:,'*..•.: e4;-.;..t''47,,lc.7-$'' "j:k''''‘ •24.,!:.i.,-,,g,..f -•ra'1:',1.. -..., .-.;77-5,,,r.,-,4-....,„*.wg,..., -'. : , . , ,. , 1,, .. .. • :'-• r ' . • • ' • r. •.' • •r, r' .,e-:.:;•!•0.1..,...,,J4,„ ..,,;•.‘rr..,:''''.-•,..- -.‘rs-,:,;:ti..:-.4:,,,`:-..,P.:..),., •wr.r .,-,-,•r r,* ,. 2-!S",..:84.;',--i".'4'.--•••••- • - •••• :-- ' ', ; r ''r r.- .• ‘ :r .,• . „' .,- . - -,•::::-zr''..c .:V7:;4:.,•4;;tr.;•,....,..,,,r-'--!. ,,-;.,:-.:-; •:,•':.,,r..,•cl;rv,-,, .... _. '',•'•,.',',,,,,* : . ;;;;T: ?lc:--,,,t-.§.--..,:;:;4:'•.,1;r:.-„-:-..,,::- : -',.,. ••- 'r ' , ,. . • "•;.:11t't-i.'",;•?'-A,;:A4'4.:,;P.4,#7-;-7r.:,:.,-.,,•,•;:" ,-,..",;:.,'""t."04,." r "1" ?''?- 1.7 '1,:e.:',i-V,;;-1010..-',*7.-;•-•:•.•.: -''' •••' ' ' - - ' '''r - - - • ' ' '• . . -., .. •:*;..t'''..,1-14.;1 4 art,-,1..'..t..4r4,- " -.i4-,-1,;.nt..%.•-•,,,,•••..,,,•';'..4,1..,: • i.,-. tg 1r • . .• .''. ,.',--.,'''',•.-:-.:: I4',..,-s.'.s-"•:.3.:`4':-,•..,T..,.1:,X,-,•,V,rfe-q-....M';`.:.'.'.-'1-,i,""t§'i",.t''`-,,•1 5"."4-1:•Ct!.„/.V,.:fr-,F..•4Y-•,.'.,,,tN,;(:r*":4"..r.4.r,...z-.•,0-fg?,'.1.4.;..ir..,,;,4711::.•,,414--1,41,,1,,V1A4A:,',-:,,•.";: .i'-,,,.'' . -'-'.:''i,,;"`.,•,',,:..'..'‘.:f.:°•:,.'. ±..•,•,';,'z`.::."':.'.".':.'-.'i,','....`,,",.1:,<,•4.Nr.a4 , 1f * 4 . i '•o y*"4.R4.1"),I..;',t'.,:°::.t 1::*:-5..,,`;4'•,,t,1,,:4,...?•,';...";-q-'-'-,''",'':'''-- :-'''••'.-;.,',..-.-•'-, .'•r'•..'--''.•.'.''• '.-' -'.-"-, '.•, :./... .-',..i:, '•• t.,-: :-..; •'..-tr% 4'444,P.t&:',' - - ' ', '• ••'• '- . . - -• . , , • - , , ...1. ..04`,7-,-,,. ,,,,E ri:-TrarA 4:1'1;•6::‘,,1"#',.'-e.:`,i2t",-•'44.7,fi',4..'1'. 4;i'" „.-;•",, -•' .1.-_,..,..:,,,,, :.". •-i",t, 41',,,,,,,t.,;:t",---;,•,..<;•••-,- ,.• - ' . ": -• ., . ,.' . t!',!"i4,",:pZ104.'gl•-0":M4.•:;4"1•1`.`.-t-•?". .....,•',-,,C.44iV,--1.-%:',1,--'4. ' ", .,134-:.., „ ••.••• sitivli...,,,,,..-,1i).- 2' :•,- :.- , , ,--. - _- - . : ".' - • , '' • - ".' : :-,-,,r*i'.." •:-/•44-VV,i,,:e*.."''':'-•044/':',••4•.•-s"1:44'.-1.-rt-.3:44 .--`- '.'•i'''1'•'•';': •'*- '410-1-5','-4.4:&•%.'1.." ' '.,' ,,••-• • , ',, . _ .„.,, : , . • , , -,- , .. •:-. ., -,•• ,-,• -•:, SI:k.,*e• ,.!4:,-:-.4t-iw.,•4•,•,•:A-,;•!1-,'5;:AA-4,,.'. , .3',7--40:.,...•,' . -,•:-.4.--'4,',---, ' ..VPii;;;"&i-.:•`.•'. .7.; - - -'' -' . '• '-- • :. .'. :'.-.'.. '-.- •'• -"--•.•''.'-,••-.-...'•....-.•,...'..04:0-Xit.r,,..,r•-,-.>,4.,.7•'4 e•'''•...1".01c.•,',..;,.'%;...-P,.7..*t,A-,"4.•::-.4.;-4'44'.t:,V,?-,.2,-.--44..4!..,:....kM."-1-.i6`i,1:A i-,. "-.-.V:•,,,:--stitfit-.t'-1iN..1'z..'•..2.Y3*•'•S',.-..4'','?4..','1-.7".!:.:_,y,,.--:'.`4ir4•-••.•.,••-- ::‘'•'"''-, 14 ,.",,,-•:.,.•,.•'..-i.•- ''"'.. '_''I'•••••.'4..'W,''..•-t,q'•-'--..-..4..r...•L.,",•.t""'........41--.'\••„:,, -•.-._, .•-.-•.,_'... ...... ,. '• , ' • .: , .. , . , . . . , . - ' . .'-'• - ''.' -.'PhOtOA' „ . . . . . ,....„LoOking: outOTT#2: Seond•growthacross:formerly- disturbed area of strip pit .... ,-. . •: -.--.. .• ,,, . . , , ,_, „ „, , ,,. ,,, ,.., .r : ..„•:. , ,. • . . . . „. . , . • . •., „ .. . ,. .. • .... .1 •. ,-• I. • .. , ., ,• .,•• -• • .. , , , .• . ,,. . :. • .., . .... , - , .,. • , . .,„ •, • .,.., , • . , • , , . , 7' ' I ...,: . . - • - ,_ - • r' .• . . 0 Q" V ..7.:. tt,--41P.-4-4,'..-M,h...". ..k.,_•W;t, . - ,. , .. , • , -. ' .:/..t,,',.•!--.f.-,-;,.',„!:.:;. ...i#,,tt,'- '-'%,4V-il_...'.,-e--1?..-,,',..-,---,''''',. nt-..-....4.V2- ".Y'''''‘',-''' 'r'''14, , S-''' -'-.1i's'i.''''.4.W e • . - ' '" - '.' . ' -- . , H, , ' , , • * ' "-' • p,A.,,,•-•_•:,..-.:i.'.;!M•;%;Vi•-.Ne,...z...177:.,5,••!,..,•-•-•4...:' ,7 .,ar,.: ,t,St.;. ,! N,,r- 4:.1-:Ati.,g!r4a...A.•.".10'?'*:14.i:...- .' '. -.-' - '.,, ., ,' 1 ' .. ' , , - ., • i - , . 7,..;,,, t-.,f-.:44,*;..t"';::-..;;;,.;;:i;;;.,:...!,..,-: •.,-.,'"'_ -4-,-f-.1.-It;010,,,fk ...--,.,.?*:(-• ., 1, .ri-R...?2'5N,''... -.:•• ,-- ?,-,....S. _" ' ..' ' "- ' „-----". ..,;.4.**-- '•-:.r--,...-... .'-':•' `'''''4 V.-.'`-q-y. ; ' --' '. F..Vt,',1 -- _ _.„,-",.%,-:-.j-• '''4.-i--.1T-,t-.'4,,,,.,..:.-..,....t-f'-',5-'.,,N ,-. - - ' ' .,,-,r, '.g..3:--.4'i•`-_,:_t-•":,'.‘, ''':‘.•. .,,,* ',',..1'',"-' ,..". ...r.:--'., ' -• ' . r • ' . •' '"S.' ' .'-' .-1°' '''"47'4<tr.•"?:-'‘'‘..(j•4"-- :'-'1"-V--ti",;-''.,•'''.'N ,-;:ijit:','",-tr•'',-,,-,-- "1-.•••-•.,41--,---.••••'. ..",.,;?•5•,;•,,r.:.,'.;',. •.- .- ."'': . .. , .. ' ' -"-.• - • -- , • • ,_ '' ''*44.' '• ;-'1,4'''-',. ,Niek."'-""-'-4-:-‘, '- - .''''•-"--... • ... --- ---..:'"..-":'t-':1V-k-', ', t -'...• •.::::-,:••.i-....m4:-..",y,:is` - • '.'1', -.:i-4 slat,-:`,N.- ...."-t!.•?.!;,.',:',4""li";t...",4 1:'-4,;,-"ir.:4i-A4,.2..,.-..114...7...,Z*:-;:: .2","-i'. 4..i.?,-.1%zi,":' ''.`'?".e';."...-"se..i"..:".4..'-....-0'.*,1" - "-, . .-• •. . •-"-::, 1 ''.." , • •"' ' . -' : ' ,,,,`'.g--TeNritit :','.":'.?e:'-e-,.`;-"-;•:-., AlOg.t '',.;•••„girsi4 - ' ,4. ,•:::rs,."A",:',-......,••:.4.-.U..",•:,...,,- . • , ,. - ,:: : . ,, :. ,: -" " ' -.-' - "I•-'•- 'r rrt, •-•Y‘lc‘,..""---,' ,'--Nt,- 2,---,',--,•..'•••*, - , .t-' :N. ‘.-:;.,,:''.1.-.-,.:,rr '-.--.',..........:••..,--:.,.,.....:,,";;,:,!:",;:,,,xg •. - •„ - - , " : ' ' .. • - .." " "2' ' -'-. ":".-14•- ' '-' • • •-'3.:•-t1--*-'•-•11:A%k•,.4-.-t4'40:';":,',--Vt'tZ:g-r--14'4.4.,•••* :-;.:::"...":;,-,.-.•:'fri:i•".....".',;-•,..,7i-,4;..',:f-i,'":".t•V •,, ", . • " , • -, .,,• W..:- '"3....,,,:,...h:l.,"-...r..... - :7',.:,,i7-•""-'1„,`,11.,.. . ,,Xiti.-,.. ....".:1,..',"..4:5t..,e,.,..1;•;;;:..,:,. :.,!•......,!.:-;:.:.:•,:il','..::.14.:," .-. ,, : . , ,-•---.,...2 !': ' f., :.• . : . . • --' " ' "'. •- - -.;.--v,;,:k•-,'''" ....:.,• .ti":.;,'--r-;:-:-.i-'„-:•-•••',3-1:•*-t..z.• .. V,,,4,1-2,,!,r..-,. r t,,- ,,.--*.,.f., .,-,.. ... •,.,........g.,,,,,,1, . , . . ; . 1, '• •' ..," -, .- .,:i.1N_1- ..1, .1-.,.1P,V....e,VP4.s.:14%'''''",,,,,, ,,,kip-,-(s-F. • )".+R;:',,;....-;-'.-:.:1'..:-..;• 1 , 1.,.11' ''' .447.44".1 '.'''''' '''''':.''.'''`'II°Gr`ni, 14::1;'•'''''' •E-Y••••"' ••••".•••''''''''''''''''.:.' ' • . •- •' •'-' r . ' ''' ''•' ' •. .• ' '• ' ' '''-•' •••'$......,•1.:'.14.•'•:V.• '''''''..V['',%-..' ..,,4:;... '1g.....;4,":•.-c,,'',t1:-':::-.--,s1,4it,••.-r;:,, •:..,..., ., ' ' ' • .,. ,. ;•„.,, •••• . , ,".:', •''„,%.-.%-,0-.f.''''N•2!:','A.,•;,,.-f-.,,,..L.,,,,•-4,:--0?..14,,,,'-rAcii,4:-\ k,r4,14-...--i:•-r- 4, ,,--,,--tr,...--r' - -.- - - ..)...•-''..- • ' r . • . • -••••-•'‘---vr.-',' ,-4,-•'•--,-,..• •-r: v,ir•-• /,..r,r1- ,,,r•-st 4'%',$.2`-i•-•1''-•;,-x":7-'-'-te- 'FF.,'f. ,i,'-.-'-..:,:iS,,'?.. . -. - • . ' . , ii:711:4.),St * ,1--;;,,.:;:.- .--` ..x.,.. ::....t....•.,-,. • ,,..'......•,-;;"4-,•;•_.,„,•.:'-.4 . — . • • r- , .1 , . „-reik.:41,•„,.,-&..0.,,, .., .,.,,krrt, . .t ,Ily,."',,i... r•it". 11- . A,,,,:',.3!-,4"..70ii,,#-S?::•-•::',".--:-...•-..:?'"::.. ," '''''.'- :,,,-."-7.,"1.'"-..": : ' r:-•-•. ' " : : , " '' , i . , .-,• '.. '' " " r. , . .--",.v,•:•:',..-m-,,,!/-1::...A :-v.,.r,...r.4.:•.i.,„,,,,,,t-..,,,,,....:•:,-,:;t. --r ,,....17.4--a,L-.7,,,,,,,tr,..7` „ ..fri -,,-i..,,g':".-5.-:4.:'i..--'...-".:-*.i"- .-; ` -. - , ' ..•,•-•?f,,-,..7.,:;2t.t&Sg.,,VA::,. ,, gt.t.,',iti V4--f:V-",1...r.-,,:' S.ii.T.....N.'fic,-i-.'"4,..,,-, . ,...,,'.',.:'';...44-77'r'.-; .,?..- • :....:':',:ct.;4-'ii...... 1.g"," --• ..- - '• . ' . .,,,,i., , 1.,,, . . • .,.. •. ,., ,,, :„At.,,v,,.,,,i, :.,.,.N. :.$,t...t.i..t.,./..„...A•,:r or".7 Aife,-..4.0..,g:-.-,,,,,....;.Lr;:..'..c.:......r..-2L4'i- ••;40i-sAWZ,,W -`4,1{Vel,,,r3)&44--. -1,,,t 41......,,,i.;i5,...i.. Y,I,.,.. ',.4A.,,-4,g.e :.:,..,- 116.1.;;;:•-•:''' .3:f::::-.-.a..,--4 fl...-,.., •04.... ,,,,,,,!..4,..,-,,,,,,t••,...-„ ,,,,,,,,,>,-,,;:, • -,,•N,,,v.,,,,:f:s.,-..,,,,..,...•__,,,..ii.,••:,,,..,-.::::...,..,..„.1,-,....•:,,,,,•117 ,.,ir' , . ' . ' ' . - ' --' •• . - , -• ,..-ti-Vit-4-':4-4.if.-;•3.$14•Ii•'-•,k4,4,-.1.4 ''..;:' ltan-Air.7113VV'',4=e455-t.#'', '. ',a(. .-•--'..-i.,- -7 ?. .i.,.7... ...' ',-,&',:iV..Lk-FLA • -. 'I • ' . ' . . ._. -.', .1,14'5....P.,"1:r.A il':',,,,.4.,,kirl,,,,:r•..4 .-.y.-...‘11.,,,f•..1 fv,..,,,..N.,.. ,....„,„.. _ _"..„,. ..f.-,..„..!:-...- . f•"-...".,,,•- ,. '04.-: ::: :,1 , • ',-, -: .. :, . „ , .., • : " II". •'. , ' • - . ,"••';•,- ..-: ....-.7-04.;..,','!.•...:-..,-.••-•• ..4,,,.....,:V.,...,r,st 5,r*.-;"..,---.•C...1,-' '--),....;.'. :',''-'• - ....,-.;-''V.',,, , .... ,.,,,!!..:44., , ' • ' ' ' •, . , . , . , -, .i-,.:.,-etl*'tq- -,::;:-'..-" ,..'- . -. - .• . . -" .. ,: -,- • ,•..41,..-,-;:l...-:';'..,-,,',4„,•,M-q?,,.. .1.,64.; f" VZN•,..A.!tliAr\t't.. :ifl.--...-';):1:".:*!i::::4::nir' P.••-..' , . .-"-,4".;:ri?4,;ii ..Itt:f:•••4:;:rt''Ziff-k4. '.". ' :44'31Ar'541-'1\14, ''""-...',`""::,.:".1.i.:4".--','.:i..e"""li: trl..4P,41".f...,,,,?,..",-, .-,- .. " -:. .. , ' -• ' -•. . . . . , . . . • . , ,-... .4.,,,,, .- ....-,,(:::.,. ......-. ....,- t.--tr, --1--...•&-.. ‘41-•-t,,,!,..s,.•• ...,....,..:.,.;,.., • . '' ‘ - _•. ILW...t,i1.:*:17,..•',11",A ....,,.,,• e ,,....,:v.*„....,..1,,A.01,..5.../-;.4,4•,-4. ...•:,...,-.:..':''''':.:••-•,•,,-.,,,- .--,•1:0.,...t--AfiP....., ''•-x i'---•-, ''' 1/2,-;„.4, ., - , -,..„,,,,.„.,s..6.,„1.:.,., ,,,,i,...,,,,,,,,,,,,,I.,,m4-4,44,,4...,,,,,-,.,-,,,,,,--,..":„.„..----,,,,-;..---,,kg.„4 „,,,..-,..„,,,,,„: • . .-' . .' r.. •..''-s„.",:,•'•. '"‘'.••-—!*,.:-..4.-,„,„,.. , 4..4.•1 "..„,'•`-%,.„'--.•.'.•.y,,,,.,.,,,,.:.;.,,,..,1„,-;,i,,"b.,".-",.,t•3-e'','.?.?.,t,,,...„,r .,0-"',•fI.v,',v.,,..,o,,q'-kz- ,r,4.S -'.'..„4.,,...,,....,,,,'.,::-,.-..:,.•...:,,-,...,.r.„.?:,.:.,l „,,‘.L....",,,,L.....-..:....3........ 0.„,.-,•-!:•-:,,•7•,•,,,-,-..A•. - t ihci6B • LOokingSOytn TT#2 Mixed coal andr.i.z,m f r4,.mailr..l,--,,...•'.,d...,..-. e,-,.b-...r.,s extend to at least 17 foot depth '•,r,H.A.I,„,c-... ...•. ,,,:•..,,. ',,.,-' r• • •..- .. , s• ,. ...,. -...:.,• -,... . . . . . . . ,. • • . , - • • " • - , . . . ,.. • ,.. . . • ,. , ., . , . . . • , . . . . , . _ . . , .. , ,,, . - , • . • • . . . _ . ... . — ,• ' • . . . - • . . , . • . . , .. • - . , . . . . . . - 1 , . , .., • - . , - . , .„. ••• , .„. • . :• . . - - • . . , . , . . • .. . . , . . . , . . • •„ „ . Spoils-in Test Trench No 2„- Coal . . , . - - . Plate-2 c ,- . : ., ,,. , , t . ' ' • ' ' . .••- , .. • 'Project-NO 97-26- • , , . . . -., '..; ': - ' ' •.• .' --." - ' "' ,-. ' ' ' • • -. -i Disturbed Area of the Old §trio p i • - • .. . . _ •. . , „ ., _ .• _. . . • • . . . . . . , • . . . . . , . . . • • .. . . „ . . • , , . . „ . • - .. . . , . ,. ,._ ,._ • . .. • , .• - • •. . . .. , . , „ , , , . • . „ . . , . . . . ._ . . . , . . • . . . . . . . ... .. _ . • !--,•• •• i• - • • ' .•. 6. - • -• ' :. SubTerra,Inc.' - ' GoldecAss_ociatesrinc ..` ;' 1/26/97- ,. Monster Road Geophysical Investigation . - - - .. :tea..-.. .... .;1^' =:i S..en•,.:' R. s• r. . • •� v3a.r a'h+'�".r.. _. . ,.s � yZf,: 3 �esa. >`xsoYq9X,;-•'� .y�r s..:.,a_ ye'• •- urx .�.V, i4'. `., ,V::;a �' , F -3' 't� i' i ; .9' i ..• bk 7 . y 9s '' -'..i .;y. : ' ;; , • • • .h � �, ; p "; ' 1' ;i•5. � "K?!^nM+ - ;.. t, . ti '':':.::„ ..- - , .F r � f ' L N"}9`,M ,- ',n .ix, 4' - . � - �f s' t , , .{. ,. b. a',-e" ' xS ,ro :.,_ F ,td- •�^2-� -' 4 , .zy.. .- - ., Sz: ^ �. `f .. -44i:s, t .r4;�4AziG ;, . .` c t ,Y"e r p: +v .. f. ..x:�.47 ' ;•,,. � _ Y4y1'y �lir: - - - - t� � S7- i. ry,,,y •, Y . = /' 1 Aw , 5f .�"-" 1 N� it.. :' a.1 :'� .rr ,.,.-< k . yN 'S`iY. i:., � r - h, C ;� 'OR. d ',sr, r.�r.- . F %V. � b . Z ,:9R �?r '' ,- 4 ��` : g fh: . � � k �q >.,; r, .3 , �� ,�.' • �'� � ' x��' 3r : I ,f; a. �s"r , s ro- cX ' k ;? xx w �� w M F r;+ rtr<.. • ' _q , , a y v r � w y K3 *a- � �' ,yr x+. i ate �. sxs . C '' tns _ ;## tf" id: : t .. - • • • • 'OK, � n. � p`x Tgyp.•�+ _(�ra xe fi 4j'i� Kti>r zS.;�•�.,w"'rT +- �+#+f$'}'•,' u ;.•. `,'i,. ' - • ,% ' �'sax ..t :tX" -.- S y :* r'rT" rCa'"\ c. :. 9,t ,,x, . fi`3n..'n ▪ ;R ..?' --' `* y : :_ : l' ' •4 AFt ? �7 .� 4 ; • iM•:_ �5� . >u } : , - _ :: !.iy ,C � 3 Z ,.. i •- �x{� . � ,r. ti ' .ti {Y. � ? _ - ,- 11:3_,.. ..,;ye ,,,z ." 1. ;,.., '�i t ^ s i r "0' 34 ,3 d g - - a Vv.... + t ' f. a ,-i-1a :�2 • '�,. � ' • ••t. 4. i. _y oa v. , ° "4 , xa r ( :' . at h t.. ' r-rF .'� , ': :::\i. k� rev _.6 z C 2y?: - ,1 a it.. y:: _ _ _ t �;.�• n s .;. < � a t . . ',` -.ram^ ....- . „... :..4� 1F, . ,, ''- . r{ �. ,yy , v• .':Iksi., '„`t,:,` ,$t t � �; . " t,„ P - . . . . -.• 44.,...,,, e� 'Mh . }; ,t , . _-- x .i: , ` x, Ai".k! L.-?' . ''` wr ',s �m y 9 1.,.} A { ! s ,.- '• t: tw.,N y a ` . . '� ' `s Y� : ,' " I4S w�" a::.. y''4 / - --, ^ �1 4 'it: A�. v �' + ' 1}•,�S _ � - ¢ .{ $ � ` . - � x . ; r af ' Sti � . I • i• n a r r ryx r •t y , � y _ `'� • • • � t. •r ;;(( , 4i"" r• M•xx _ _ _ k4� jx' • - oZ - - � ' 4" x}• Y A�94htd' t4,1� Y y - 4 i' ' 3.E C c F. ::g. • .aitc. , - .Gs t' >_� i r S SZi • • A • -. ? � }...ate �Yii^ ? .:.` . •"i+�-� :Photo A Looking South,-coal'was encountered et,a depth.:'of•10 ". .. .. -_ Photo_B. „'` Close'-u of coal.and weathered'bedrock g to 14 feet beneath'weatheredsandstone:and siltstone: '" ' P looking • - - - . • _ .. - _ _ - - , ,, .out ..._ - - : _ Plate_.3 Test.Trench#3 =Coal Seam int the Weathered Renton- •Formation ' Project No.:97-26 • _ SubTerra,,Inc. Golder Associates,'Inc. • 11/26/97 ' MonsterRoad Geophysical Investigation • , . 't'il.".. � J ' y .L u 3• . A E,6'" i � 1 yyy . <,:g� � .: 1 as Z "y Y z. '•„d{ .` n J a 3 � J A T .. 4 , i-sk; Photo A 'Existing, prior to excavation TT#4; . , • I . ' - .• .. • '°'+ i""'•: - '.. ;.`;. . , r b. �ce ',, . 4,'S,,,w_, i. 'i s , •S"g.!' .. , _ ;.'""! `may; &e ,.4Y aik,.: .h..t.' • Z ' s r N t4, `t % 4 ,' c•T/�J )s CF t..h ram, >�r '?S; rk F,a a4a ,, . : 7 fs " w s{4 a sa$ : c 1 23z §fA y. k,h: saF 1 ^ v ', t :L' { P "` 1 -ter `1 x . -- ,3 M• ty.t� i re T 3 h t Cpd ;,,+�t 3` �F . Tk` nn-'4 4 Y7 l .2 .t�,£M T+ F'" 'T ' r'A d'V.t a Y usr r xis km ,-',..'`a 'Ki^C• `�ilj k"J »3`.. ,' , �,, • ,' I � '..r�. '� .r*`� 1 k'.''a` � � sr "�''� •,,i�u 's-x^:v"4.>Xx'.3x.. }a�,-.y,:s..> ,ti`:i.» ' 'fix wa .::', 4 f:' };F k .... 4;�- '�^f. 5 C' ')_ x� y� • }4F,jyr f x 3't. , n7i'�.3 I � f. 4t 3�t .*-•?. '4 ty�l fiuil�: 'f^-'Y-t,„-'rl, . /,k...: — ,, f'" 't 41• ?t� �F m. tx i ., 'eexC w- ,1 n.7 7, .-at'4. •,i,•4'' ,s k.j° '''_ ? , _ .vxy� g 4 F 5„s.4y >.y,:r2'"r+ p,, sas." r?^ ` -1,--•:'W...y.i'', r 7' :•' 4 40444 , Photo B Iron •pipe in fiill'soil of TT#4 Soft fill's•oil extend•ed to " -_ .. : below the 18=foot reach of the trackhoe. ,. , • Plate'.4 Test Trench No. 4 - Existing'Sinkhole with . ' j `,Soft Caving Soils.:;: _ Project No 97-26 • - =-- = SubTerra,"Inc:• - — Golder Associates;Inc:-` 11126/9t — . . : Monster Road-Geophysical Investigation' , ,_ 1. r�'�x r�. ?kbg.:4i,;. 0 tir*'g" ' }�-�;s. • -1+� t4;r + x 'rt F • - Or ? ![ ' , ..� k. ` k4,1 _ `4-,„- : ,,•:. .. .. '`� 6' �c . .'' _,c ,' .�.` •yw: 1kr.v '. . M1 i .i: ,. • - ° 3» ^`:.":>yy ' r. :,'Ef , r,+n '1' ..1 , I ,�+ . #:�^• ,r x <,r ,,*1ri::7 " r"ii,. � y,i t,.,' 9: 0'.r ;. �"»✓`�b��bhy a �� �,. ,sr ,`t9f t Z: na aE ' - t,.::.jr • 41 ,�, z ;- F.i .'' .,lY,",:i�„1ee•g-- '*.t 4y 4 4 .f474 '+"' 4L" h •i�' a , • - s ✓ ` y lfF ' ?s:?• a' . • _ " A "k'1;" 'er:.tiplcy.'�.k'n':�P +i "." 3�t " - - 3�•� r,avJ 'y l, ,` F . ... - ,:r. ° , - _ ;., ,-tr., •• .�.:.+:ah.�`'kaa:4 • �;°M1"',w ;.,e'"R 'Sh' > ._ „ S44., :„;.,......it, t� ' ` .h 9,rt �'Air. � .it ,�1.41' -x. : ' .'- R$:: ' J • ,^.A.,,F,,.Z.. F • ., +r; r.', S`yu , 'w:r'ry , *, ; e. • Y ' ` 7wz% ;'A �t .9t, `A q. :ca. t•14 . 3 •k _� F+ .4. '!1'.14. yv � vAi k`k 4. -- r.?. _5._. .s<"• ;A tiFrok. 1dY S' sS�"zLt ' �' -' 1.;, •.} ': ..�W 'xq% 'P .•, ,F" J.rms: .3 _ `.Y.4.�t....t, ¢, m P, '.�Q1,, .',;� -, -z w; ,- : %' . ' „V r . ilpi` - . a to4�rw,-�y5"+.•R.e,e,- pa r: '�. ,. R a,_• gi.t%' y"X•:it ' F ` i_ Ii i. . ..„:.. o s .:z r,1 � . , :";.' k•'•-:t,,AP",.'r WP' >x' r s:- < °S.,Y,• ',II. } :`�._M.�* y..t� ' tg ,rs fix.x ;. a q5; • - , :.:It..".11:11.:1:4 tr•`^ '5:.-�iy+•ar.?k., ;s'.1`'rs-i' .r, - ,•`+, ti', �,'13�`F- .✓;i.'.„*� ; >, . > ,.;r,., ten.;•.�a� - F•✓xy.. _ �.t` _r•C 'i;.,,-: 41«A • "t �Ny' `. -i�. 'Y +''ri%"5ybi"+,?. M1 Y`yyy'�q }. {8k•}.}• ' fb ;•zid,� ss3 n 4�-4 - .•.. ". t K q ?xtg `�• ;'+a�y,� �,r-:;,.kf R-�.,. g a,• t., - ' r• ;106_,4ptP3°�,qil.* , 'A A.7} - !!f x ` a e'%,rj.r''' ''?: ' u, y Yr ., ' '.44 _.. t .1 -r o d t-X., k :a, z:i' . 0�y t t � q�' '��b'� eh.: - � A�2M '}tom,-. �'L,,,;4`: ro n fi. k ;i} • ..r ' • s;�""h ww .`.:E.`h.. x�•3kx t Ca ^.� F.v�C j § �,.' �yF. > - ': '.•:'""',J,� z�.a•;.;.r xA•.�y't .. aj`;: - - w r v '. C4 • l t4 i • ,tI.�* - ` t' y rk '`4.-t.., { 'w c� ' a•,,npa�„� .. W ti. r�.4.�va" ` r , ;.r:..:...3 s`S _. ` s j - two` OH `" `� PN„µ,+ .. ° '�' 3" ..•.... } �S y _ yy �- I 7>Sb^ ;a` x• 4 _ +' 4' 1:a`x:''hk*'4 '{t .ak .. s 4,.i.,t w 'E; t M. • t -1 'i,�Yyp"Ki c 4b i y1 "y gg �. t �•-'"- - • i,' !'",-"'.1•.. r- . t'.,:'0,1-- ... -:",-•:,... . ' .•- , '', ' - - . . ' ' ttil eft ,„,, s-,\,.k,.. .7,,,,4i ,%. .,,,,,ss,,,„. ,,,.. , ,j-` ,'t'"" • . ,. w e rs ' '''. wry` _41.11 ,jti(rh: : .' I4 z k.j F� t }j•34 .r, � i,aa 2'. T" tb 'y. •y�. ' g t.. ir . � f�" • • - ' Photo A- .Looking`SE at junction of TT#5 and:TT#3. Weathered Photo.B' TT#5 Looking;East. Coal seam pinches out about. ' -clay'rich sandstone'and:silts-tohe:atop• .coal seam. . -. • , - _ -- • 15.feet.,East-of TT'#3.,• _ = • es Tr Plate-5: Ttench.No:'5 - Coal:Seam Beneath -: Weathered Renton Formation. • Project•No. 97-26 ' SubTerr• -a,Inc. Golder Associates, Inca 11/26/,97, Monster Road Geophysical Investigation , , ">` '" •.}v"'h `tee.."+", t# ,-r; �i 4 i 1,1:4 %'�1 .'4q" ' x � �-. yi�,������T"y - ?f �� '4 d,.v7 � Si y.�"�3 � f s�5 F" ' Wit' 4 3 "k4 dv``w� K tj '' 't r ;1 i `+ 1. j e,, I, .. . : . P.'6();$' ,i..,,."T.I.-st,,s-,,,*,,Vt:', .,,,,,,,,k.pf*..,,--:-...,_' -,-;z: I, ,,,,pre.v .4 fi "" .40,„.b A ••, "-- ' x i r'.- cl t _fin Yr '.'--I. ,4 5' Try 5 ' } u �'Y' £ '�}�p�',: n"'t a } s .s"�t�tf s � .fib 7 ;k F.� .,�,�Y��'��� '�� : Js � - � r� f.cr �r��Z,: } ;�Fyta���E5: � A`� td£ �if,.t u Y �`y �'f�'f"a'` ' � ; 7r z to ear^ ; s e3 kj s fr �- .mv .,,,-.F'�.v `'-if,:,. 1a.. y r y 3,Y r-t, a." ,,'' z-,`,r ise,t ."',y"F.t._, : Y r.a Y L 5 y �1 1, F Y '[ .' g3 ''`• 4 • 4 '4 Y l 3yt. Y J1.r4 - ' 3.' 3 A 1• k,� 7.i,s +� 444 Z. Y $ k'v H i, i �i s ^ -r+ySS' s� J x L f` ft "uyf +"£ a� i i ' F .. Y '17..w_+' a.... ; l r'"+«. i r"",,-- .`":6-x crSK'.:,A-' , fR.. f wd'n g , - r Photo A .TT#6 looking South. Weathered sandstone and silt- , stone was encountered to a.depth of 14 feet without any evidence of coal. ice, }. - ,.Y-:: ..}.. L:_+_.,.---„z 1.`' ".3 .r9`S;7-.`'!y. �.. nsvt .„r � ,S.r:•�]_`''_:�:.. ,X":i ..ffr' �:?�kmc ( •uy��:;: • - - _ ;:k� _wc„ap1+i;:A+ '#4.., t Th,.•: .fi. - „v s,.Yi„ :tr a.?1':2�.:..*'(�,", .q. �;#, .#s�.• :��r- bLvvf4c. ..�,s - KA?+.:, , �^�,,'-,�,:y� si a�y Ji e- `»`,A. - ✓:[`,Xw" �.- �aesi-�'" `+..,-.�? r-:.�+SiaS4e4--'- �i%>v' y 'r�'��FG j:'�`;._. • _z 1 ` t *fic �4y4 � y }fi ' -4'4 _'4 �-�S.F •1• 4:0r '' �=- iKk ;- aYt r tr ' y .`"5 •r: .•4a+ ,YK ' - S • t t;,M , `s Y - Y t ! 4.ir yI yn y : ' "_ ` a4 .' a x4Z , K i 4 £ �t "' , ' x �,.';'%ta, { . . � `",a....?„..N.,,,,, iks`, C •e r J c t a ''1s„ r r f , K 5. •� 'c _� • ``} - , `f,r4 ': ; am. "4 i. - . Y ,K,•:.. ;f a - • ' f/,r..;k -'*y".. X ._.. ^ r i k t V > 7, , "Frr k Y .k '.t 'P s ast rY * •} it`vY 7 Mr is' ,,.. , .a a' Y -.r, • - 1. , ,-v,...�•T N4. ."GYt2Xy i. F) ' } �4 ft -s { - • ; ,> FX' 17' Y`g ?'s,.w.*.s r, , . t 'f ryH ."1. A ,t - ", � �' f +t • � sue,, ` , y} ,, t ',w I L �',°f •) 2f;., �+' Tr• 4,1,.. ti S Fr i+� ,.1e , j. .k-«: , 4 , Photo B ' Looking North from.TT#6.'Note blackberry covered'. site indicative of disturbed'soil.. Plate 6r', Test Trench No. 6 -Weathered Renton • Formation ; . `Project No. 97-26 SubTerra; Inc., Golder Associates, Inc 11/26/97 ' - . Mons.er Road'Geophysical Investigation I : . l _ gal.qy.,I r •ydr1;'y,KLri�.y-. • r`; s=b,:w, v= r' ,. i` W ,- ' ' Y q •ma v`4i'k4 ,� s :R :" _w 9? " -, ,4y ,^ `y • i: -s� ' ,'.,a it,:,,rii,,-,-,4+ s- +' - : ,„w' x %'' x ' { ' • • t it tnma : *,, a �.. 3 s3 h fi �, y :r� x z+rs 'F` 1• r-ay� � ; n 3 $ -3�� Y�y2 ey� S t h' a ct'}).-_,,A:',,,,,,.,,,,,,,. C _' , k. if Photo A Looking'North along•old exploration trench',,pr+ior to digging U#7: sfi Fms ryv u a, .3 � Y:,i'K ' a Ji • v ''• -, 3 A s Imo, • ' }tk, i 'NI.,:t.rt,•4.harf ,1= { y c�- 5 _ ... 1 • .4.0. ^t 7` � 9Tw' y4 �t } ;; F• A x L a. • r _,4. ;��e x. ra,: ,<` t t -.M { ^ %'' tiz` ,: -x A 24 O Yy 7'. ,)kg? e uii -;y1 r }i . 1154 ash t is > " • j ' ,Photo B - Looking NW along;West side of•TT#7 showing'_zone• - where'coal•was:extracted and_excavation was , • , , subsequen"cly filled.. i 7 Test:Trench No.,7 OId Exploratoin.Trench, with Coal Extracted: Project No..97.-26 ' SubTerra; Inc' . _ Golder:Associates, Inc. 11%26/97 Monster Road'Geophysical Investigation.; h S a $ aa r. t �z 4 - V "�F r R �j:A �:`1pa 4 � • • _�_I� ' a' fy „i wfLs e ,'t. { ,� �"ra 9€ . ,. .. F, ' •'� % ?4-0.g,'5. xa„ii t'x,' k,'.� 4.-•F —'Y n3L'4 , • I.. rYG� Ir' �'� n : t▪ o-a*.. ��_� ,`,.� 'I f - .r x +" ate,.: �1` '' a #yy; .-�'sg., :-;;1-. 'n't';' ., , '07 ' k 2 4 t" `fig:4p.,r q, .. . ;.4 n• � 7 ', £y ��'a� 3' -• •• - x' 's.rx 4Pb^5 � `�r! -.!� ,y ,P�i:.i:.�,:'�§' t �y • • • • • • f,„ .ka.,, !,"i .try''^f- r,4 ;',y �M f m&M��.'y` ..��i �zx.. c , • • ! • • • •.;ink A4 .,T T Y s!' .� :c"-5.. I,& g. '� ' ••• .-$ V ,isr.., - 'P�sst,4 ,: , ' Photo A. TT#7, Photo looking,South. ,Coal was encountered. •' . :within'about one foot of the°surface. •` . • , , ` \1 . ,zi se xe fca` t "` � �rrr ;' P2 IFt '• ,.• - ' ' . • ,: '�' '+ V is^'. fi, .r^ - y- ,�, : r . .-';air. �fa.;' I vMF Y%. yyy��1 1 I • • rr. c;; --.,�9' - A,'4,,t' -x w+h).. �,1�:'::-".^,,.:a:2;� - _ ys� at,'� , - - � •te-i,,'tS r t i,••• s ,v b .-S'-y=.?' , «L :"'�,s�:. : `n�r r !;_ { • •.`'� ��ay,1�t '":wg 3 v'4 e '{ .1}'•'}t �'' t$ 3 it _ fI 0''W).1...`•::.•:,:+,•...,',b'' S y 3 1 .f M » 4j Y'. • `:5..,� ,I�i`t ti'4 40.,4Zi.•,...Y , .� s .'C -x•{ •,', f•,r3?-' ttiV T... ;-'; i'`''`,. �,i s ,a3 rN: '''!W "...Jr:, A,..,lct �� 'd' 'i ',J.i':,;':: 4?'?'.c*,`..�r'�iA', '„ia. - PhotoB .2. TT#7-Looking South Coal"terminates'abruptly' , „ . against'a fine.sand. .; • Plate•8 ' Test l rench No.'8' Shallow CoalSeam: • '- - Pinches'Out;to the South in bid,Strip.•Pit Area:` Project.No.:97-26