Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA81-003
r.%:•,•,'•!'"".':•:•••`,'••h•k•••••;",•':•,',i.,".".,:''.""',,,,;,,• ,. , k . •' . ,,,. . 11.„•)1„,, •.•,,,, T:,-;'Pi'.,:.,•••• .1."-,'",':g'")!"•,•.?--,•,.:•••••.":,,•••••',;.;•: or.•1•,,•.'"f..,'',.•"•:'4,-••'•;,''••:•.''',-•':''"•';',''',.•••••''''••••••irf'•-• ''''''i 1 ''• ''. ' 1•'' : '''' E.Y4`,'..' ".i''.;i::•••i;41,c;.••'"Y.f.',, , ;,,,,-•.•'•;:,-.1;,•,,,•,;•"••••;''''(! '.,''• •;''•'--'• '•••••' •• •. ,, c', -,,,ft;,',V.,,,,',.'''sok,k:,,,,'L'•,,',,i"•••,-,'''',.,'•Pk.,,k 'k..` '":I' •: ---•;...'''''',.'''..-'. p.:4.,',}k' .'1,"';'.,:''',."',,'4,';',4 -' '1 ';„•''';', . •' k •• ''I'''' ikt•;,,,1„4'.'','''', ,'P-,'','‘Z...!IR!'.1-''''',',',.:",-,',,,!,;.:,,", 1' '. ','.'-',' '',...', ",''' . • .." ' . ' ' • kV••,,:,,,',••.....,:',,V ..,•'1',.' '''''-•••:',:'2;' - k: ''' k- -;'. : ;. -', • ,....,':„ Q:':':'---•',!'''••,-,;',' k t.l.ci ,'ke,•-•,'',kk' ?'",•'42,,,;;-,•:.,".,,-, 4... -,.••,-ik. i -,,..,t',..."•:N';',[ki''":ki,j,.•„.:. ,'!"..' -.1,•,',•;','•.' k•; ,,- k 4'- ,, l',N...CP,V•"•', k,'' -.-1,:':',','1--;'''.: '•''k ',''' '• • r- 4 2 N, 1 . 2::•-•,.-, 1 - , 4.- '' • ••-1.-,•...,,,,',, i,. 1.-•-„t.,.1...-...:: ...th 7, •x 4...:..“' '' • ' . 0.: .:‘''. ' i'. ...- . . . 1..,,,,'1,. , - . " . '' .. T.. *. -.. .,1.0.,‘.... ','-'.''..-' 1 ,SP 44 ''• '*j 9 ^'''.' . -.., . s . ' i J.:: 19r,4; 4 •, 4 . . 4,4 ,••I''' '.. . .'- i.......,',U....t..TP-.*,,t'4•41111111.,,...,•%:41A ..., 4.zt.ii.....--,6-,5.....,,,,,,... •..,•,.JV.'''‘'‘ 1"."4 ,4-14.-itulltr.'`, I Af.'""ClalthF4t44,1:'. -Ilieli•N.-41r.Ar P4'4.e-f-'14,r.''',Yrit'..-,....-:1'''',7,:c:,-..r,;4 .'''' .k.''.• i 11.4.M.W,4:Pri.'', ''e.h.'41,,.'10qA Ipl%4',.!4•.:.7.4- 41IP;• 41''',N.''ri.15,t*..t:P. i,,,,,i..ii,r.,f,4 rtri,,..p.,14,1,3141. '4,'fk.-,:.-...4',;,j14,,,A,-{4'...?...,t,- f,..;..-::... ,,,;,,.7...,..,,..-r; 1.:,,,,,,,,,,,,A0' Pit.,4,V.1.6`,,,i,.43.i...ft,4.11.11,q1''‘,..;r,,,Ri7...4.4..t....4it7' : ,,,,---. • 4,:, '''“, ,' ''•-•-..'4- V•,to,..'-'I.r i...401",.'1. .41'":.!..1.;. L''' f;•%41:C:111'''' ti.:0$1114'''''Z'';1:*t'',3..ilei.Citl'A'4f.N.:.'..4(iIii.4a,' .-4.a,'.,',' , • .,..., a't4'47r,,,!,..4'Lrtif:‘, ..14,2,..AL.t.,,t-,-,-;,74sstOg':.,,r1'...',1'.":4'.41 1..t.'''';0:"- - 1..‘1414,111`..:'•:...,;,41'.'''''"3.6- •••oe--,....rtcre.',-T. :"-v.j,,,,Ti. -1.i.ko",kr.„,-.le".-14,-,,T-.0„•, i2,',,[".,;.',. ' •,.• '' ' ,'•••!'''•.''''' '-.."; 1.'.'.,; •:•••.' •!•-•.,'_;,.•-,...,..-',.!--:•,...-i.•"-.. .,'...-;,'-k,"•:,-..,'••••••"'...•••••••,': ' '''''''',,,,„.. 1.„...,P45-,••••iv'';..q...1.0.914!!'ilLI:.°1.;• 4%';', 4..i';1Z-,-. 1.11TA".11.,,,,t,g,..T.'!../:. 4, 1-.....:'''',4''''...il-t„.''',1,,,;;;;;'•-:,:"..;s4,:iik., .,,.f4,, t.:`!;..,..; 1.,;t:',,,?,1:•';:„ 17q:•";,•4'.'„'•.:r-k'zIN4"kio"."?.‘0,•,,7•.•6,,,•,: t;".0.1-'' -.1 p• , -" 1..' ,:- -•,...;....-, 1 T.T.....1-w,•,,,,;:•,,,;,...,-41.41.,•...%•,•.,,,,...k.., ; ,.. , .,. ,•,..,,., ,,i,,..";""J'-'? AUTYT;•-•••i•Lt;q:'.'"WT:,•,,,':"N•114..-ct•cw,••!::.;•- ' . (.' -" • •••' •'''.'" g. ,';,;•,••:,.: ,.....,....., ;I,,,•;?•,..,,,,..••,•.-y,,,,.,,,,,;-,,'.,,,,,,,,,,,..4;:r:,.m.-P'gs,,,•p•;',;!:;',••-•';• ' ;.'•;!;';,'''-;';.-•• '''..: -:';''"if,-;;;),..,, •-1,5,0•.•••:fi.,::,t,,,,livin'.,;;;•,,'•;,;mr•;,:io';;; ,-'-' " •e,•'4t., . ...,k,-it,-...71k• -t :,-,..•••;: c,, .•••,-.•• FRI.,%, 4;;;•.;t!?•,0.5,,..,..,;•4".,,,,,?•;T,4,":',... .,'',•,-. .-'• • ... • . r*.-;,....,'.', •.--m.",i-,--.;:,..-,tr,.ik,,,:•,,,i,!,..,,,;,' -,--::: ,•,.,„ ,..,,.•,--:• L.,-..,,, r,„p..,,,•,.......,...i.:,.1- ,.4'-'.i,i1,:."'",,_;v:•..,•:••.,c1,:,',. , ••-,-,•!,••-. :,. ' ''%'•.•,- .., • ••'.:.'- ' ;-•,•'.• ,...'.: AI,'i'' 55. . - I •..i;,,2".,k-', •,-.;•.•,.. ,.'••••.-, o ',.. -•t . '• 'AO k.,,,,,,07.10,147.,'" ,...''•qi•• •;:,•"::1,::",..v•irOlArl''''''''''' ','::•.;‘•-. ifir khiF, 47; 44,4" 'ri• •••'_ ,,,';i'a':,,', ,•,-.., ii....iq'.4;•::: ,';'t::•.1,'•,,." 1.,...,• -:...,-,V.'',L 4 4.,3,,,q,„„,,La4;,„;• ..'__.... , ' . , ,.,,,., 4,,...., ,'„,,,,,,_ ..1,41.,:.,.„;,;,f,„44., „,,,..,.,,.:.......-:•--'- -'' - ,.. ,..•,;..,,,... „ kr ,?... ,,,., , ,--,., ; 7.,,7,-, if e.,-.!; ....,,..__...._.,.,.•,:,'-• "..• .,. t.1.44,41,1, 41,1.1: 4'..:""":4- ••'''.'t,"' i'•••••.., "•...;- '.-:.:" W•;-::''....-'.'','-',--`..'-','-',....-4'''' X. .k.,,i *'-4 s:''... ' *. .7*e: 1. r,';'.I' . 1 '....k•k III i.•;',,..--• --'','-'•' ,'.,;. 4,,,:-,, :--. 4, 4:;,.4,i,...!`.•,,'",,fe tS". .L.' ,-. 1 •'„ ., ."..'• '"'. 1.'..,:1', .: 1,‘''',..",..,,,T,-,k...,r '' i •:P.-, '„,',:k..P.'-'1*.1.'!..':,',,'j-.1. ,.''':'..f'I '.• • , . 1";11..4.'r':'•4,.4, V4:',. 4. .".. 4' 4.5.1;.t''''`.4(-.` 4,•','''' 41,a; 4'... ,,,',,r,;,,.. :, .;,,' i.::_,-.•• .- ....4.,t,., e44,,,,,"•'.1•;.•,;:tr,:i., t'.';',.•.%,:-.. r.,,,:„ , ,-..,„ ,•-i•-•(,-., :: -,, k-;---". ••• ..• • . • ;.... ' 41r...• -;- •'•- -7•••••'.7.!- '''.•" ' 2!‘r a...-.3.f., ',. 11E.`•r ,.:.',.,...t..:''.e.,' , ...,,-.: 41:11W. 4 b. ,,..-,e oN 7...4:- s.,:...,.,:- - k•,,•,,,,.,:, k.•.,,,r.i:,-''.V.:..;,:::,.,., v...' --. . ',4' rit'11. e, i:, t', t,-..,-7'..*:;!.;...-;•.'*•,,..',-.",‘,'..,:.-,„....„"..1...„,_,....,,.._ ...'....,....... 1.--(...1'....-,-,'',, h',•2.-""-.....;',....'.•".....: 4,',..:',...:".• .,'x`'`Ph,IP-,'''.'.*h..' . . , • ... ... 7.1!...,'.^.414‘5•...,,,,;,.*....i."0.--.." ",..... 7,...„ .,• .., . .. . . . t '.:'' •..., 1 ..-.9"4,',11".".;:t%1:•'''4,;.",-•I..%i r.',',•,•,;.V.,.,..."'". ei..• a,- J,.....", j.."'"'"..?"'''''.'":- h•- r,-::,) r^tlif...tiV,,PL.1.,','^'.14.'"''''';'..'..1,,2'., *:'P.:.1, .''...'''''.-':.?:P--..i.'"*'›A':-' -. '' '' ' :" , . ' ' . ' ' • - j'., *„ 'i'::., ,. ' 1:!•'-',"nP7.,.';'-n-' 1,V.I.".,,,-41..,;,itZkikk,•'.',1'," ".‘..". 2. 1'.''', .'.-.'-';''. 1-.-,1":''''.,.4:'•:•,.'''',:z''''',T '''.'"1,,Iy.'..k..,-.f,,,,,,.,..").ro,•i'l,,,'•,;;;;,,••;-•,-,...,',',-,"•.,5,•;i7t:''..',"';',..c."•,.";•,"„-•.;.,,,'",•;,`,",r;.•,;,•;•."'":":14'..!!!,•;--) ,,•:•'•••;','.!•;.',•••',i''''''••"••••-•'''''!,,!•`::::-,n ''• i,,,,,-."4:•f,i,•,•:;-.a.,,.:.:-:•f,.."1', -,•,":".":.f:;•;....'„..,,, •:••.•;,•:•.'•,•.,1",...;•::•,,.;.,,;-;-,i".•,•.'„.„-,-;,i,i; 1"-..),•••,•,,;•,,,•••..,;,••••,.-.- 7,1"•"•1,:;,':.•0 • • . , .• , . „ . ,. . . i:;•:,,...;,..•...,.••••;;..,•,,i„.1:••••,,-,:fk,4••• T••••••-••;•••,•.•-?,k1,T1••;',";-4:•.".'.:,:.4,1,-,"',,,'''."--"F",•-••,.... .'.'4,'.4,--,,,,.,..2,-", , • - • . •• - 0',-",-;;4•••,,,,-,,,:k:'",-,;'-',...,•', 1.•''',. kkk;,'•".';'•;.'1,:k'''-',"•,'•'4..,,':I•i,--fi,,)..', vill,-..4 '.),k-- k. ::•:,-.,'L"--''''' ...:•"":'.'',-''..--' - - 1,,,'',-,,,;k-'',a'-'-,''.;,.;'"•'',:',‘",''•,,'•4f(,'1:;`,....`.,-,.-•••7!!',",,"'2,-,..`L),•-•"1,. .,",,,,,,,','',' 1',,"'- .-:„,';',..",:4, ,, k,-,-,,,,,,,,,,174',,, ' • ' '• • • ''••• ' : '. •''• ., .•• •.-•, ; .-'. -... k J!,?•••'!.,.;:c,'-'''''''."';'..:•',....S.'":''',.':- k ..!,.;'...''.;.' ''', ."''.. .,4'•••isik.'6'.,',-1;'.''''f'-?•.•'",-k.',•(Sk:.;',''....',',','..,''''-'''•";: k'••'•,''YA k ••- , • ' - .... . , 1.•:',F::".,',,,,,':'•,:ki`•'.',-",-".•C'•ki",-,''...,',.;:.•';.,',:;;44- k •''k.44'N';•;..,P,,,,,k-!"'";'•'," i•.;-•-s,,,,,..•:, •;:„...,,,,.•••,•:,.,4.,,,,',-,,,-,,,,,4,77,",,,• . 4--- F•'r...''..Th....:.,.';':,...''.'' '''''.'.: '.',. '•;::... 71„...:'.'...;,:,,',.%... .''''', ...,.'. 0 '''•.•‘.‘ • :'-''••••'''l ,..--.- 7,,,,, ' •- ,: ' •: i...'11',''''•''' i','''':.'::::'i.V:. "i i'.r.,':'5 '413r7S5'"1:0•:;i5i'5:'414 V;;. .3-.4'.01.."':4P'14004.11'il .',. ''.,f'..6711*V r . ..... . . . 1:::: 1:14;14;.,4:g r.,11:101.12;4AVAtA.A4YOOPY• '14,14MgikitYliiAirOM.ic4rFi,3,41.4,..:4,1, 7•,,,e14,414';./..'0. "' ,. 1.04.?V:i.4.;.1,.. :'.1'''.4Y. '.61P,41.0.$1014W4 . : I ii,C,,,a,......t.11;•.......!1;,.!frieti••.. .., . ,,,,..4..10.., .. ' ' KUIA.q.1 ifirtirfrt, • f, . cli,',?•'''';',•t .^ `1,..; ' ret-' T•... ..".•• ' . .':- rk. ' ,•,- -4.'..M. • 4"IgY# ..a:-.-"V..2.;ke te,,,,--,4.••,,,i;.-T.. i.k.,..K. .4,,,,., ,,,.....,,,,.-..•-Y44.•.'t'' ,,-a. .t.',1•T • t• .."-t.,.. :07,-,,,..0• x••,,.0,,,,,„„•-;• ,..-4,•,,,,,,,t4".h,•?,i,...,'- !„•,!.,";,;:. .-. •'-<••'•',..-1,".`,••;1 i fr•-14 kv:i• i10:1,Al.fi'''tTe-ttg'•••:•c•-••••'''''''''•'''' ir Ia.''•:•Ak' Th,,,,-'., , , ,1" r• t '• •-•-" 44e•Itl'A;.:•.;,1-i T:•••;•1•:!,'T.i."'i.$•-•';'" • '''`::• 11/4,,;""6-:A..-...•.' .,'..,,,,,,•,.- • ,•'•,,•••,-.:',----,-..,•i,,4:-,, lit; 41,'*',;.`",,'°.; ' T, ii. .„.,t. ••,c.t 1.•ik,-,,,,,,,,,,v, ' • 410iegeire -. ,.,..•••...',.. .• - ,_ „' - . • 4.---''.4)-•-•'''f!'•••••=t..• '..,;:__4,.,,.. '... •'-` ..: ' ,..-: ' vs•-. , ., ,.,,r.,f.0 .".4 i,! ' 3;''. l., 4w4a1.4 f iimr- ....... ,,,,,, ,,„.. - , ,.. , . , ..•,. A, ,,, ' 3.7:'^'6VZ' ''''v .`4'tr''.'i', ."4 71.''' 't .i• . .. IV,e.l.'•', dt3 1 -'4 -PF'„ t4,..4*', SiVh.,,.".'.;,,''..'.,' • ..'...1... •',',•,.1..*:.'.•..'' • 1.....,.'“-...."! .44.....„,., ...s'i 21''''..1•••^,•':..,:,,,X•k•.."'• .1.,IP ',A•e.r...11:. .loc.,••..;-,.•,,r' - .:-•••• ,•:•••::,:lt - -- -.... 2--.1_...-_• _ . . ,..-.... :..„. .-.,,,„..._,, _..-,--. 1i,,*'' '., ,.:4;•• -14:. 1 i.,:.At,,P...., .!:.t,41'''.,4 ..1:,,,-'.','VI:- ',kyil...', 4 ••;,,,itlir ,i( ,,,.. :-. ,., ,,,,.,---ii . . i. .,. f.,....-.,... ,-,-- - ,.,. ,...4. ,,I,',..,,,'' ,‘*-. ,.,!..• ' 04itio:jit.'" ''•., 11'''..-::..'",- ..'-'' •,.. 55 Al$-5i-,:.!,,;,.. ,.?m,... ti,„.....,,.7..,.14, • 4 lei,, , 5. 3 `1,' .. '. f...,JP.' ,-.', 1,,'' ;,$,SV • 4.4.);A%'...4. rer,,,,434'7'' ''''. " ritiZA44:;4 1 1• ' 4,,ill,"..' 14''',':!. 1,t.ali'e4;.':'.','4'.4,"' 't!Ai''* '4'"'cieT1.):.'',t,S';•,''1,..: ''t'';'"'' ' 44. ''' t. .- , ,..„.......0,,,,,., ..... ...,.,,.. ,...,... .r 'r,, ....g.r,,'• 1°""',-, 1,1-9.6TT:IP ' ' -, ,•,..- • ' , . • , I''..,'-'t-4';''' -1,2"iir'• '.."-':"' ..!•••"."...'..''''' ','. ' '' .' - ..--..'."- r2--.-.1•.."•••'•••• . .''"..1:." k ''' ' 1 r t; ;.•.' 4*./.•., ''','''.,t'A''.-- --• .. '• '.• -• .."-‘,''' ''•'''''- t'-:•.•'':":','',1 '-'At.; :7-,-.„:7 . ' .. Y• l','rt.',44.',tit:,4;•,..",..!" ', V' .11`.},:i'..,„ al,,,N,'i.,:,... 4. 1‘,.,,,,;:t,,,,a;., 4 a,...,,,, .....4,',',..4, L.,„„,a„,,a.,..,.4.!' i • ,a,...,, ,,',,,,...,,,..,.....! a• a- 7-.. . -'.. '',; i2f 4.:;2' . 41""it .'45 v-- ': -':;( k•: ' ' • i..,•.,Z...,--.i-to•,--",,k4,,4;:t s•,.1-.•.,Avf,..Nt.,,Itg,-.,-re4T-1-11! -A?,,,r-k -•,:g;;;...,:-...", •-•;;,'`:1••"''',,,":",.4:-;',/•••',','--• : • ii a".. h,•,.1,.,*i:i;• --7:(l•r..r.-.11,%''',';,,3"'Ci',-.4`,..'(i'-^,4',';','".''''','N.,',.'.',,.„.`"??a714 91';4,4.:-'4,',.,'„i;...'4,iki'!'•'%,,,..\".:4;03'.,;"..4:-.1" • ,6ke,r4V?,,'..iii,'.',`','',11.4.,q44a,'F't-'4.04144.4',.. ..'4:1:P4',F4'1.'......-4';':;:,{',4;r'fi":“:i T'.. 1'A4", '-47'''''', ":::,;'''''. 41i ' - ,.1'.. '• le.6.;;Orf'T•'•''''.:514;'.31?‘:ii',':14•;',•;",• ;,• Yr',Xar.41:•"••:•':'..,,.. '"-,`." .,,,;,*',`,',;':', ':•*:;':,,,f,P,4':,:1,•,,•• ,....:-.,....,••• r• '•- k..Z4••?.•,•;!"•;••••'•q....,)';'.'..V4'•4- 1;•;4.1,ft;',"'-‘".-''.,..1---",'L,.,"., •••••.,"....41TITsIT,„.R.,..k.-.,,,...19,„...--:, ,:.., . , , . .•• .•, t' ' 4? 4,' i :qi41•4''''',''.:,-. 1.,•' 4"-s.:,-,1";.'':' '''';"•• t':'(.'" :,'"..':.•'',::::'-'•it7'10;,4,14•••‘J-•"?.1.f.,''',.•:•,, •-• ! t.-",../.:',. '":"•`.;;": 4''-.,'', - . l'?g;1•5••••;` ,4".•'11,1"f.,i,-„;.'il.•';,••:•••;.••••,..'",•-• •••,',.'*.:',.:',"••-,''',"'.1',N,•-54''„••.•.",,'••'';1',''..;.'....S'' l';;',).-Vr'f.t.-:'.:'''..';i:,- i.'i.".•''''',;''P'''''').:Vi.•.:,:';',''':,':;''';'i'g,.'''''',;'.e".....r.../..,':';' ',.A.f";r!..":....,':,.ri'.:.,..,.1.I,' .,::..,',1,...:„'"-...i'.',•,,;'':,..''...',,,,,,,,' 4',,',. 1,,,I.,1:,,..11`,...:';'-',,',;,'.:1'.,,I.I.V.....,I.:!.'-v '-''A t. ''''C','''''''''l•4"'' '..'-': ''''''''''''''''''' tl''''.'1.'-'4"""''''''44 . ' - _ .a.V.1,/!.. 1;';',.•1.,T..;:',1'": 4,,1.-.',Prk,,-P,:'..",„:40,..',P..;. ,.*",,-,,,)\-'. 1''' ..P.,'.';'1."''''','A'",...',':.1•••...''-•-•,,';-.1',.''',''.. '''...",',.:2,'. .'„ ' • ' 1 ...", ,,' . • •' ". .. 11.'..-%;'''.'.'.. r,;',.1,..,'`.:.•,?.:',-..V' ',-'.'','',.• .4':''•*.:••:::...,:;".,:, t,i.•••%;•:'':' '',':,• •':;•-•..',:','.•'.;•, ..,..,'•,-;•. , - • :.„ ..;,,,, •• .11..,'"0,',,.':',3"-;1 •••••,',%.1?••"!•;;,.!•:',,,'.1'_'=:1•-,:..,••':•• ‘-"•',••••••,':-.1,';•:•": ;:•••••• ;'; i o k•-,r-,.?:•"'''n"."4 • • .. ' , :•'• ,-, VI::',1•.••.•::',": Y';'..••-:':''•'.,,,,,'O.):,,,q1V,••'•",-;•;...;":.,..k•i:',;.;,....i.,:;•,:,',V,-;:;","•:...J.:-'•;, ' '',.,„•..•',•,;.• P.:'.,....-",'',.' IV,:;:).:r.:,••4:•";':4••`•,„,"1,',.,: r.:',,',,"••,-,..0.:,•',:;.•::,‘,1,;7"..•••.,':;'•'•',..',,,,, V •••.'-: '...-•,::. • • ••••••'..-;,:-. G.,....,, . . . .,- ._ _ 1!4i,,,Y;. .. ' Lti.Y.::::'_- _-.7'•-••• ••','''-j"'"''•i''''''' ''•-• ''-•-•''''''''.',_'. t".'7... __ ' x g4 l w rl' r ,.•,,. a.' '- *" t `. ? box se= Sr 3x,-;,• ' ALW Se' i.. r =., - r- ' f xf £ a . nr. 4r " k'-` , ki i fti. x ; 4, 1ti rs*, r''+!.. T.,.' sue 4 x ` si s a, . a cF' - fiS" i $- r. t- tF a ? ice, 1: i $' F ,, X,.. i' v%§ P.?!.., • i. ks.,•, k^ e`^ •. 4. e, E, rra '"" ' 4 s, '£ +.^ i 1, Th s' j a c,- f.++ t a. x , Y " k:' t uM rs'-' tea ' ,: r h... y ti .. " . tea rr„ br+"'` f ,„'."... w" _. iswy 4 J. d.„ x d ,;., , na ._ 7• rr' Y a E t. xr';:-: +`: nyF n. r " s x a: f fi° Yib' 4'° F k;` z . c`', t,; 44: 4::'.' f r ,..., x 3. , i7; n + : 5" 7••P: 4h- r + nx wf s^ s ' ti g i` 43: ` xi 4 t` r,•,. d r" a q: Z. 4 ><> ' kr hs' kr - F yc,. f- '' ry `' M> t} x' rz' , eft`" ^ 4 - v€ ,••.+ ""' fit: -' El, kx-.,`, w t " a r` r, ss +; r 4 a' t.- 1 lx e• t' F" t t r x , 3" .. x ' Lis' £< L • c i .,' , xx . 3F ' 3. a4 r " 1 k t.', rv . a/` '." i" g -.!± l'-': r+ .' u. i FiM. f a f:?.' k.,.. "?, aa_ arµh.-, ` t' yam ". a:, i' Cz., K , r k., ri;` f4, a, ttj. cr-' g—.,.- : 34':.::;: ,._ x ,. a',{< r mac yC- Ii x b 1,, : ate'#' -- t`= %"'-' - ;: f -.- t', f x Ly ." o '-: ' t. ` 5 .: ws.., z '++,. al "= .-','- 2 '' -.. sx '" _ ..,. r y I. q•+ K; d i x4 4 ,' r 3 . s. sew . A t,':°«.''':. 7:" i Y a. u..^- d + W r ..,^ > to- L r z '. a _/,.' ' '- Z' h max •, t t„ x-...: i kra,• a i : z.. ' a. f r S$ 2` „ rts, r. 4 " r ti- 4 a" r r' .-_» r a m d - srsr " sat. r l• a4 fW S, A( jyj{yc 1 rt4 85# 1f- p f a i E, a'' a Rv t r '`' y . Y.`., r:...,,"- - Syr. - i r: , v„.' i` 3?" , i. ' t, a , sr,, sue. . n ., k. -. .' t .+,. 74Y= NZ: t.. ,+ 1x w4 j; rs. #-- S`' + n„ r f . r T: f. r i_. 7 to u-,. t 3L ,+' " k,.., i.. r t x a s y ltii, r i ,' ha z. a aF„ . 0 .,,_. r Y ; ,, " y-„ K E` Kr., i s i r- T .- "+. 1+. 1,` { y wit S 3 mot, ' as', { a r A c. Fr r 3xi J ' a". Ya,. r c; h,: fi"'" F. 3 y jl r 1 f £ y 7t r dyrt, y, rY' e+ n"' V w y i mot+ z s N r '' 1 a} iW a . c" i` ' 1 , " ?". x"* "* .- as d r f' E y.*. Q s'•'+. 9+ x.. sl. . k r• ! r ' ll yY U - 4. , a c J' w„£ ti te, # f.. b ; a'. yyr, e'' 3+x, l 1 t+ a k c, ‘ " fay 5 *, u _ 1; 0,,.. a,:_.. 1--.-:_ f.,-; .•,_,.,,,,, ,;•_,.. i:-_,,,.- .;,..- 4, 0,,, r.....-.;:.-..._ . _ . fir. % a• .'. ;;- e _ x a Dc egsm OF Si71 U BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS • RENTON, WASHINGTON lig MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 • 235-2569 O 9,0 0, 9gT 0 SEPZ O P of k` July 14, 1981 JUL 14 1981 4.1 Mr. Thomas R. Dahlby 24/1 Q64 3212 Mountain V i ew Ave. N. NG DEP Renton, WA 98055 Subject : Deferral of Street Paving at 1402 Maple Ave. S.W. Dear Mr. Dahlby: We return herewith a copy of the recorded Restrictive Covenants for the subject deferral of street improvements. This deferral will expire on May 6, 1983. Your plans for this improvement should be filed with the City' s Engineering Division prior to this date. Very truly yours, Richard C. Houghton, Chairman 9ce4.44.- By: Jean F. Truman, Secretary Board of Public Works jt cc: Building Department Planning Department Engineering Division 2 05/1 F, 04?E. T FEr_.G:I F 5.00 CPSHSL S. i ii 44 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS , _ . I : T: ' y . O N ap ill are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton , O County of King , State of Washington , described as Exhibit ' A' attached hereto . WHEREAS , the owner( s ) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use , present and future , of the above described real property . NOW , THEREFORE , the aforesaid owner( s ) hereby establish , grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land he'reinabove described with respect, to the use by the undersigned , their successors , heirs , and assigns as follows : INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS The owner( s ) of the above described property , their suc- cessors , heirs and assigns , hereby agree and covenant to participate in , sign. a petition in support of , and accept any future Local Improvement District ( LID) or city initia- ted proposal , and pay their fair share therefore , for the purposes of providing the necessary off-site improvements required by the Renton Subdivision Ordinance . Said improve- ments shall include but may not be limited to the installa- tion of curbs , gutters , sidewalks , street paving , sanitary sewers , storm sewers , undergrounding of utilities , and street lighting . These covenants are imposed in lieu of Section 9- 1105(6 ) of Title IX of Ordinance #1628 of the City of Renton . FOR RECORD AT REQUEST Of RFCORPFD lNn'; nilY 0.,...... . MAY 18 11 21 RM 'Ri7..i CITY CLERK c c ( h : . i :I.191, 'w'9 98055 P INL, CAN I ' J DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025 . If at any time improvements are Sg installed pursuant to these covenants , the portion of CD the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improve- aa ments as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation . Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who a're adv7'4y affected by said breach . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING On this day of l ,19 <f// , before me personally appeared Ec_/,' !(- , l }r. _ i%4 the person (s ) who executed the within and foregoing instrument , and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person (s ) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written . Notary PubliIin and for the St e , of Washington , residing at 4. Description of the real estate with respect to which this policy is issued. 1402 S. W. Maple, Renton, Washington, legally described as: Lot 22 , Block 21, C. D. Hillman' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according O to plat recorded in Volume 17 of' Plats, page 74, in KingaDCounty, Washington. LI)EXCEPT that portion thereof condemned in King County Superior Court Cause No. 588861. OD eceipt # /-3y9- CITY OF RENTON j PLANNING DEPARTMENT I?NAME rare r 5 L Ct 1`l tf DATE "VW //) 80 PROJECT & LOCATION Il c.(Vu?C - ; P M6/)/ /het Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total Environmental Checklist / 1 60 Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee 30,00o) TOTAL FEES l/6 2, Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank you. 3213 Mountain View North Renton, Washington 98055 January 9 , 1981 City of Renton Planning Department Renton, Washington 98055 Gentlemen: RE: Justification Letter for Section 4-716 (A) We believe our request for a reduction of the 20 foot setback along FAI 405 to 10 feet (Section 4-716 (A) ) is justified because: 1. The subject lot was originally much larger but due to the construction of FAI 405 , approximately one-third of the property was eliminated which created an irregular , triangular-shaped rear boundary. The imposition of the 20 foot setback would leave very little property for development. 2. The 20 foot setback required by Section 4-716 (A) is required primarily to allow for future expansion of the primary state highway. In this case , the right-of-way for the state highway is excessive because it is adjacent to a major cloverleaf interchange which would not vary in the future . 3. The Planning and Public Works Department has under consideration an amendment to Section 4-716 (A) to change the setback for structures from 20 feet to 10 feet. 4. Only a portion of the proposed development on the subject property is adjacent to FAI 405 - approximately 20 feet. City of Renton January 9 , 1981 Planning Department Page two We feel that the proposed development would enhance the property by keeping the building in the earth tones, landscaping and required screen fencing. Si r 1 m 'R lby 01o.a c Lb 'iJ 10,0 I I 1LJ ExlSTlr-4e- RESIoCI-1c.6= Tv piE uZEP roil: 1 2-o - 12p EILe,', v sA, PZ 11` v,,2 STOfLcda-2"155r* o ; I HAW S-Vc7r AC.A Esc s' c, d P U I LDIIIl 9 a i,.-I -v n,T / r$2 abe- 1 500<i` E o P3 4) 0.) z _ P.CS .cR tiAa a 0.0 car eeE1-1 pE,4c.fi n r- z 0 d e v e I o p men t p I a n F IRE ,..,-is Ih FL?-i- v i - ,-- 44414 e;71:. Iv-- k:/,---,ail I-, .— --,- . _,--,- --_7... , , . 1...,. ..„. , il iiititl* .._ --,•,-_,(.- i o slimmes ,r\- --• s 1 ` liiiI 101) ` 4 o-N T SITE l Il; 1111111111011I' r1ll o II 1 Ill 1111 1110l,0 N L-pLtZF j I z2ujH[ NTE-2" 0 VICINITY PLAN + DEVELOPMENT PLAN al ISept 1 1930 7 Apr 7 1980 0 IM1 APPLICATION DOCUMENTS FOR dale 1/4.b , I 2 MI T 0 M D A II L B Y Q v i c i n i t y map a . I . g o o d f o l I o w , architect 4 SING D] P NT RkLI i\i, ;w REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 24 , 1981 APPLICANT: THOMAS R. DAHLBY FILE NUMBER: V-003-81 A. SUMMARY 6 PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks a variance composed of two parts : 1 ) A request to reduce the required building setback of 20 feet from the northerly property line (Sec. 4-726A) to 10 feet; (2) A request to reduce the parking aisle width from 24 feet (Sec. 4-2206-1C2a) to 22 feet and the stall length from 20 feet (See . 4-2206-1A) to 18 . feet. B. GENERAL INFORMA PIONf: 1 . Owner of Record: THOMAS R. DAHLBY 2. Applicant: THOMAS R. DAHLBY 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) 1402 Maple Avenue S.W. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property: 6 , 000square feet 6. Access :Via Maple Avenue S.W. 7. Existing Zoning: L-1 , Light Industrial 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-6000; L-1 , Light Industrial 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on February 8 , 1981 , and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on February 6 , 1981 . C. ;IIIS''ll'O;Yp, A.tL"KG]1DAD]EAlD : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1745 of April 14 , 1959 , at which time it was zoned "G" . The property was subsequently rezoned to L-1 by Ordinance 3469 of September 24 , 1980. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TC fE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: THOMAS R. DAHLBY, V-003-81 FEBRUARY 24 , 1981 PAGE TWO D. PHYSICAL : GfAoa;ND 1 . Topography: The subject site is relatively level. 2. Soils : Urban Land (Ur) . This soil has been modified by disturbing the natural layers with the addition of fill to accommodate industry. 3. Vegetation: The subject site consists primarily of tall grass , blackberries , and brambles with a few medium growth shrubs along the westerly frontage. 4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation on the site may provide some habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: No surface water was evidenced on the subject site (May 30, 1980) . 6. Land Use: The subject site consists of an existing single family residence. To the south and to the west are single family residences, also I-405 is adjacent to the north and east. E. NEIE, ra::®mI:IO rCHARACTERISTICS: The general area is in a transitional nature from undeveloped and single family residence property to commercial and industrial uses. A small unuseable lot lies between the subject property and 1-405 to the north. F. a a,LIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: A 12" water main extends north-south on Maple Avenue S.W. adjacent to the subject site and a 24" sanitary sewer runs east-west on S.W. 16th Street within one-half mile to the west. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the Renton Fire Department per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro transit route #161 operates along S.W.• Grady Way within 4 mile to. the northwest of the subject site. 4. Schools: Although the site is within the Renton School District, no existing schools are located in the general area. 5. Recreation: No existing parks are located near the subject' site. G. APPLICABLEL SECTIONS O$' THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-712; L-1 , Light Industrial District 2. Section 4-716 (a) ; Setbacks from primary state highways H. APPLIC ;:c1[ F SECTIONS OP THE COP i:imu;SIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY T: 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, June 1976, Objectives , Pages 5-7. 2. Section 4-2206-1A, Chapter 22, Parking and Loading Ordinance. 3. Section 4-2206-1C2A, Chapter 22, Parking and Loading Ordinance. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: THOMAS R. DAHLBY, V-003-81 FEBRUARY 24 , 1981 PAGE THREE I. IMPACTC ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems : Minor. 2. Population/Employment : Not Applicable. 3. Schools : Not Applicable. 4. Social: Minor. 5. Traffic : Minor J. ENVIRONMENTAL SSESSll 'T'/ I I;R OLD DETERMINATION:ON: Pursuant fo the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, the subject proposal is exempt from the threshold determination of environmental significance. K. AG 1;' IIES/DEP mini T'S CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division. 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Department. L. PLANNINGNI! G DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The variance request for building setback is sought for a +1 , 500 square foot storage building to be located at the easterly extremity of the subject site. The existing configuration and unusual shape of the property are a result of past acquisition of property to construct FAI-405. The applicant attempted previously to purchase from the State of Washington existing narrow portion of property adjacent to the northerly boundary of the subject site. This proved to be unsuccessful when the State indicated that it needed to retain the parcel for future interchange area . expansion. These actions severely restrict any building construction when the required setback of 20 feet is applied. The applicant has addressed these facts in the variance justification • (attached) . These points would appear to support the criteria fora variance outlined in Section 4-731-2B. 2. As indicated, the second portion of the variance request is to reduce the parking aisle width from 24 feet (Section 4-2206-1C2a) to 22 feet and the stall length from 20 feet (Section 4-2206-1A) to 18 feet. Restrictive covenants of the rezone (landscape requirements) along the northerly and westerly property lines reduce the area available to meet these standards. This fact together with the irregular shape of the site location of the existing building suggest that there is reasonable justification for the variance request. M. DEP I MN T'AL ANALYSIS: Based on the above analysis , the Planning Department recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve the variance requests . r•..'1 I o t'• i] r r v1 i rl r i a r a I J' 1 Vim. o. d~ I 4 e.H 4«:, 1 r„"`..,• -,,atr ••01-c 4 •,., r ,I ,• ,1 q. 11 ; .r`' lia • fll. ' r I . , r 9 Ce7•ice v(.a o: 1.-.0,/ . 0 . ..,, e, ,,,„,,m4 , .,,,...„,.., ),.,..1.. i. v.o., 0,,,,,,, ,..I ' 50-4,',V40, ', 4''' 0." .c•11 • ; •:. •14. , !.• •.- ' • ---N , rfre \ i '; q ' ' fir'} .r', . 1i1}. F"'« .' 4,1r i', ,33 * ;r• I t 44) v •w,^ I U 1 /1.tT. .N1 ., • scit, jjTd W ( p•°.-gl , p,-. 0. •+, fe. ' r .. • 1 r d a + `td ® 1 '. _ ` W_, fQb Q}n } F t) ` I t , 64 1 1 <A •i a. \r.. l. • •,: • ,..f' • •. ••!-n f' • • .B el a • t°.'/ dy;.to!A aT r A 4. i, \5-1 — •,.-, e. f i-r.-i9 ' 1d I' ILswe . , t . ° °E .- en.,r.. w • Al 1 N x>' 1 I'I.I I a•®mom a..g.4 ii1 r v .r e. II larrt 02, . ,„ 1,...1"..i e mu { a _( ' , . . -- 11 1,\! -. i : ri ; .,1.1...: G am et t. 0 0 1 ••; 1vV- I Io y 1° i• i :r also 1 1 : i+ c , o E rease r:cc c.s:om THOMAS DAHLBY R-Oil1I-80 API'L I CANT THOMAS DAHLI3Y r,)T Al_ AREA +6,000 sq ft F'I2 INC l I'AI. ACCESS Via Maple Avenue. S.W. ix1ST I NG /ON I NG G-6000 EXISTING U`.)E Existing single landIy residence I'Rc1POSEU USE: Rezone to peril t use of res idcoce I'm an of f ice and construct 1 ,000 q Ti stci 'age bui !ding. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFAl:TURIN:, FARK COMMENTS f 3213 Mountain View North Renton, Washington 98055 January 9 , 1981 City of Renton Planning Department Renton, Washington 98055 Gentlemen: RE: Justification Letter for Section 4-716 (A) We believe our request for a reduction of the 20 foot setback along FAI 405 to 10 feet (Section 4-716 (A) ) is justified because: 1. The subject lot was originally much larger but due to the construction of FAI 405 , approximately one-third of the property was eliminated which created an irregular , triangular-shaped rear boundary.The imposition of the 20 foot setback would leave very little property for development. 2. The 20 foot setback required by Section 4-716 (A) is required primarily to allow for future expansion of the primary state highway.In this case , the right-of-way for the state highway is excessive because it is adjacent to a major cloverleaf interchange which would not vary in the future . 3. The Planning and Public Works Department has under consideration an amendment to Section 4-716 (A) to change the setback for structures from 20 feet to 10 feet. 4. Only a portion of the proposed development on the subject property is adjacent to FAI 405 - approximately 20 feet. Cit- Renton January 9 , 1981 Pla 1 Department Page_ We feel that the proposed development would enhance the property by keeping the building in the earth tones , landscaping and required screen fencing. Si2.9firel< < 1by cA I) P.=.**•'_.'':*•":'''''''•:.—,n--r I'l 1,.,1 6.-.:1-••4.:_-. ,...c.,-,.,-.7,:io-;,--- D 1 I Fi -,-..- -:-.. .•,:e.., r.,.._. 1 1 .... ••rl....e.,, . :.......,f--,-.... • 33" e., Ai'2.• 1 I ::..f...--,--:.-:;',.., - =,-----,fs s 0'•r- 0 •), r""! :;-.. '3 e:'.'":.s.';F:.- :---. .:r t'• li --./. 1 , lew -..;-.-C--,rz-',1N•c. - I • 4 7 ..• r>l.1 I I....I,1 ri 6.1 f,CO 7•&-...: .r...::...F7 •---- w G tlf_ ' .......:EsS— ,s—s.S., el' :2 trr .,,,....c....e-,1 r e.,-.c.-e. s..;.,:, 7• n i•r Fir.:-...r-- 4 0 21 deve I c) pmen t p I 2 n I, i ...•.:,,.....z,.....,...—.:-_-...,...-- 2,--, L t- f 2,-1 f• f\Ait 77-2—.77,-- -- ..',0'• 4P-2P....5 fe,,.. i -- - -K-------,c r- Ii•iiii, I.) --:. N.,,-„, ..; 1.„?r3,. ., , ;lig e_.•.'--'1. 1-- 1'.:: 11I11,11-7-'--,., ...,:<=-- -,,,,: -' s...•‘,..,,,.51-4) ''''•s!T 7 Nil I ill( I Ill 1111.111 • 1 . ' 1,i;i11 i. !III7 0111111111111111JI't_o SeJurrLit-11-E-/Z.'0 r-- 1 VICINITY PLAN + DEVELOPMENT P L A ,1 --- IL- APPLICATION DOCUMENTS :0--P SepIrt 11418°1: 1 • T 0 M D A II L B Y i v i C i n i t y n-i a p 1 I . good ( allow , architect 1 2 • • P P • 1941iiial Planning 12-1'979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : 4660 19-E ,-'6 ° at*c c. el---Piacig) 1 ., 1. '0 Location : li49,1.„ at? tvo: Saj Applicant : C , , TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ', 181 Police Department R. C. MEETING DATE°: lith °ti Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division l L/ Utilities Engineering 1 Fir1 e Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITINGFs ' T APPLICATION REV EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF AIR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEir PROV !E THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved I l 2--- i/Z-e/6)/ Signature of Director Auth rized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :L(7, , ;-/ r Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved aki2________ ,6 I-5/E'; Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date L JziI if Planning r 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application :e9 e e el Of 0a Location : m ropc t4 Applicant : A, Parks DepartmentTO: p SCHEDULED HEARING DATE k , Police Department R. C. MEETING DATE / Public Works Department Engineering Division Trafficraffic Engineering uiBlding Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITIN FO' , APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :OU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF APR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA PROV iE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON Atif REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : L J Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved zz--6 I Signatur.e' of `Director or A thorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 12an979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application . '': 'fi.'" to e) - crf its"° 1 r`y t 16 to 11 0 Location : ® ;ram. i.f; Applicant : TO; Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : .,., Lq 3 Police Department R.C. MEETING DATE . Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITIN F1 ' ,T.5 APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF Ye R DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA PRO®VIIE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE XXXXXXX Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Lt. D.R. Persson 1/23/81 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date r Planir fir. 12-n197 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET App1i cation : 1,4 4) ' ® r And god Se Location :45 o Applicant : TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : " ' Police Department R. C. MEETING DATE: Public Works Department i Engineering Division 1v Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITIN F ' T•'f APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA PR OV THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 PM. ON Z7f REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/,DIVISION : l"j ENe; AtuEgIAICo__ XApproved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ID4ti/6I DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS , 6,120 0 4 are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington , described as Exhibit ' A' attached hereto . WHEREAS , the owner( s ) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use , present and future , of the above described real property . NOW , THEREFORE , the aforesaid owner( s ) hereby establish , grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned , their successors , heirs , and assigns as follows : INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS The owner( s ) of the above described property , their suc- cessors , heirs and assigns , hereby agree and covenant to participate in , sign a petition in support Of , and accept any future Local Improvement District ( LID) or city initia- ted proposal , and pay their fair share therefore , for the purposes of providing the necessary off-site improvements required by the Renton Subdivision Ordinance . Said improve- ments shall include but may not be limited to the installa- tion of curbs , gutters , sidewalks , street paving , sanitary sewers , ' storm sewers , undergrounding of utilities , and street lighting . These covenants are imposed in lieu of Section 9- 1, 105(6 ) of Title IX of Ordinance #1628 of the City of Renton,.`s: 411, 0 I3PAJ,j•; DURATION These covenants shall run with the land an.d expire on December 31 , 2025 . If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants , the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improve- ments as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation . Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who /e d ly affected by said breach . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING On this F day of 19 J', before me personally appeared y i,/a,e, , the person (s ) who executed the within and foregoing instrument , and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and: voluntary act and deed of said person (s ) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned . IN WITNESS. WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written . Notary bl i c 'in and for the S,.t of Washington , residing at 1 4. Description of the real estate with respect to which this policy is issued. 1402 S. W. Maple, Renton, Washington, legally described as : Lot 22, Block 21, C. D. Hillman' s Harlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, accordingtoplatrecordedinVolume17ofPlats, page 74 , in KingCounty, Washington. EXCEPT that portion thereof condemned in King County ,Superior Court Cause No. 588861. OF R4,4 y o THE CITY OF RENTON U ® NioZ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT o co- 235- 2550 011'6-0 SEP11-. MEMORANDUM DATE: 6 MAY 1981 TO: BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: THOMAS R. DAHLBY/bEFERRAL OF STREET PAVING The applicant is requesting a deferral of street paving only. This seems very odd considering that he will still have to install the curbs , gutters and sidewalks. The use change from residential to light industrial suggests that the improvements should be made now because there should be an increase in type and volume of traffic . The site has very little manuevering room for vehicles and the street may end up being utilized for this purpose. RECOMMENDATION: Denial CITY OF RENTON BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS APPLICATION FOR APPEAL DATE OF FILING 4 6/77 GRANTED DENIED DATE OF HEARING 5164?/ C APPEALED 1 . NAME OF APPLICANT f/om4.5 9 1Jiq 40 24z-- '9,703-424 (0 ' Please Print Telephone Number 2. ADDRESS sac or !Ilya) 6' , 3. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY INVOLVED J 4o L. r7 3 N' Yr' 4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED: LOT 22, BLOCK .Z/PLAT C v gurnilii*S 5. NAME OF PROJECT/PLAT dP?2 ,Y, i1,47 j0& -- 24A6: G"¢1 5. PRESENT ZONING: A - 1 7. ` EXACT VARIANCE REQUESTED 81,6 J1, , ' .7"/ n,4ea. 1 or 5-r8"'Ley 8. WHY CAN'T THE PROPERTY BE DEVELOPED WITHIN THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINANCE? 9. WHAT SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES OR CONDITIONS APPLY TO SUBJECT PROPERTY WHICH ARE PECULIAR TO SUCH PROPERTY AND DO NOT APPLY GENERALLY TO PROPERTY IN NEIGHBORHOOD? 10. IS THE VARIANCE REQUESTED THE MINIMUM VARIANCE NECESSARY TO ALLOW THE REASONABLE USE OF THE PROPERTY?4.5 11 . WILL THE GRANTED OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE BE IN HARMONY WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF ;. SURROUNDING PROPERTY AND NOT INJURIOUS -50 THE NEIGHBORH OD 04 DETRIMENTAL;,TO ;THEPUBLICWELFARE? Fs /vey /51/z5nit"6 /)j.91 'Y'G I DECLARE THAT I AM THE OWNER/AGENT OF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION AND THAT THE FOREGOING STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE INFORMATIONHEREINSUBMITTEDAREINALLRESPECTSTRUEANDCORR5CTOFMYKNOWLEDGE , . AND BELIEF. SIGNATURE OF A PLICANT 4/15/81 5 . 147•OF 1,-- isl k 61-1.2-ri-A4, 1 ga,,,r2c$1-14.a. 4„ t -6, 1 Tc•r:E v-,S17 roz7- 35 e•- It zi-Z.• arA,-,-..,--...71-1 - t.5-z.-F 1' 235r- o ; r-- 13,2, ,-,-,m.,Nri- -t-i '21'--'•-• 2, pi Ps - • t 4 z_= 0 C.) 5 -r a• —---- % r h o aa< ..,,0---I 3tiJ..../ 1 r-i5W 5-fc._,RAcA5 o a 874,e, I 47,a,,,f o 1_ tsi 10.0 off .‘x..a.e.a.,-1 f sr-44E047a.a 4-P-04 17- n I co 0.,•.,,,, co a tr. deve I opment p I an ri..p.i. It6-1'. tiok• A4,112A.A.4.—.- R r-I-rc.7 t-I 7-s.;;-'42..•:.'-'- ,--t"..4.-1- 4•tn.- 1 , ...-.0 ..." ...,...<..........- ....-_,;,,.._ - ........„ . 1• s•, .i ......- 1--"N 6- ',n.,. • ' gr. _:...:....,.;,...";.__...: _.... ...,...:, ' MIMI. A ' 9•71' I u 111111111t \‘',•.-, 1 II U 4 0 01 I 11. 11 `; i1 101111 ci)4,->oupic..crlisr-2.2' VICINITY PLAN + DEVELOPMENT PLAN i: 2.S2Pt 1 1= I,Apr 7 1930 APPLICATION DOCUMENTS FOR TOM• DAULBY v i c i n i t y map 1 a . I . goodf ol low , architoct II 5 5 • • 1 7 • BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS Wednesday, May 6, 1981 Renton Municipal Building9:00 a.m. 4th Floor Conference Room Present: Richard C. Houghton, Chairman Richard Geissler, Fire Chief Ron Nelson, Building Director John Webley, Parks & Recreation Director Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Roger Blaylock, _Planning Department Mike- Parness, Administrative Ass't. Jean Truman, Board Secretary Guests: Mike Bradford, Steak & Ale (Jolly Ox) Thomas Dahiby, .1402 Maple Ave. SW Dirk Winkie, Win-Key Enterprises Mike Smith, Belterra Development Co. MINUTES 1 . CALL TO ORDER - The May 6th meeting was called to order by Chairman Houghtonat9:00 a.m. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Moved by GEISSLER, beconded by BLAYLOCK, the minutes og Ap'LA2 29, 1981 be appnaved as uvr i tten. MOTION CARRIED. 3. CORRESPONDENCE - None 4. REFERRALS FROM CITY COUNCIL - None 5. REFERRALS FROM DEPARTMENTS. a. Auxiliary Parking Lot at S. 2nd St. & Lake Ave. S. , HAS Properties - Mr. Houghton noted that Mr. Gordon was unable to be present at the meeting because ofillness. Discussion was held regarding denials by the Board and it was noted the matter had been discussed at the City Council meeting. It was recommended that when a matter was denied by the Board that the letter from the Board which con- firmed the denial should also give the applicant his further course of action.Moved by NELSON, seconded by GEISSLER,, the Board aequeat the pnope.' wording £ramtheCityAttorneytoinsentlettteaz „p 6 den al o 6 app!.ica ti on to tea the appU.i.- can t what his next cawr s e o¢ action coed be and h iz nights to appeal the actionetcthe8oand. MOTION CARRIED. Discussion was also held that decisions by theBoardshouldbemadewhentheapplicantispresent. The matter of the AuxiliaryParkingLotwasdeferredforoneweeksotheapplicantcouldbepresent. b. Deferral of Off-Site Improvements, S. Bruce Cass Office Building, 333 Rainier Ave. N. - This matter was deferred for one week until either Mr. Cass or Mr. Lucker could be present. a4ez4Le.e. c. Deferral of. Street Paving,; Thomas R. Dahlby, 1_4.02 Maple Ave. S.W. - Reports from the Planning Department and Design Engineering noted no objections to the requested deferral . Mr. Nelson asked if the street was tied in with the LID onSW16thSt. and if the applicant had contacted the Engineering Division about sewer facilities. It was noted that LID 314 would not cover that area. Mr. Dahlbysaidthiswasjustanalterationtoanexistingresidenceofabout600sq. ft. that 'he wants to convert to an office and add a warehouse to the property. The e51e t M. OF R41 Z BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS o RENTON, WASHINGTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • 235-2569 OVA co, 0, 91TED Q SEP1 — May 11 , 1981 Mr.:Thomas R. Dahlby 3212 Mountain View- North Renton, WA 98055 Subject:Deferral of Street Paving, 1402 Maple Ave. S.W. Dear Mr. Dahlby: The Board of Public Works, at its meeting of May. 6, 1981 , has agreed to defer the paving of the street in front of your property for a period of two years subject to your filing a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants with this office. Fill out the enclosed form and attach the legal description and send or bring to this office along with a check for $5.00 for the recording fee. We will send you a copy after recording. The deferral of this paving will not be in effect until the restrictive covenant is filed. If you have any questions, please give us a call . Very truly yours, Ri hard C. Houghton, Cha an Board of Public Works jt Enclosure cc: Board Members Mike Parness 1 i t; fi 7IS 1 F March 5, 1981 cS/// OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION , APPLICANT: Thomas R. Dahlby FILE NO. V-003-81 LOCATION: 1402 Maple Avenue S.W. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks a variance composed of two parts: 1 ) Reduction of the required building setback of 20 feet from the northerly property line (Section 4-726A) to 10 feet; and 2) Reduction of the parking aisle width from 24 feet Section 4-2206(l ) (C) (2) (a)) to 22 feet and the stall length from 20 feet (Section 4-2206(1) (A)) to 18 feet. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by REPORT: the Examiner on February 19, 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on February 24, 1981 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department preliminary report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the report, and_ enteZed the following exhibits into the record: l t ' Exhibit #1 : pplicAeport and pertinentanotherFileagdocumentsPlanning Department cv Exhibit #2: Site Plani Exhibit #3: File No. R-044-80 (by reference) ; Approved Rezone for Subject Site The Examiner7notedconcern that refusal by the state to sell the right-of-way may indicate plans for future expansion of the freeway which would support retention of the 20-foot setback. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Thomas Dahlby 3213 Mountain View Avenue N. Renton, WA 98055 Responding to the Examiner's concern regarding the state owned parcel to the north of the subject site, Mr. Dahlby advised that he had directed a letter of inquiry to the state but a response has not yet been received. He indicated the recommendation of the Department of Transportation to surplus the property because it is unlikely it will be utilized for expansion, but a time and date certain for resolution of the matter has not been established, and a decision may take several months. Mr. Dahlby indicated that due to the irregular shape and size of the lot, a variance to reduce the setback to 10 feet had been requested in order to provide a well-designed building which is functional and complementary to the area. He advised that the property to the south of the site which is a mixture of residential and commercial uses is vacant and available for sale. The Examiner requested further testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then invited final comments from the Planning Department staff. Since no further comments were offered, the hearing regarding File No. V-003-81 was closed by the Examiner at 9: 17 a.m. V-003-81 Page Two FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of variances from the provision of the Zoning Code requiring a 20-foot setback from a state highway and from the provisions of the Parking and Loading Ordinance requiring a 24-foot aisle width and 20-foot stall length. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, the subject proposal has been determined exempt from the threshold determination by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 6. The subject property is located at 1402 Maple Avenue S.W. immediately south and west of FAI-405. The site is essentially level and an existing single family home is located on the site. The house will be converted to office use. 7. The subject property was annexed into the city in 1959 by Ordinance No. 1745. The G (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 35,000 square feet) zone applied at the time of annexation was changed to L-1 in September of 1980 by Ordinance No. 3469. 8. The applicant proposes to construct an addition to the existing house to provide an industrial storage building. The new addition will be approximately 1 ,500 square feet and would encroach approximately 10 feet into the required setback from state highways required by Section 4-716(a) . The applicant has therefore requested a variance from the setback provision. 9. The proposed use requires three parking spaces. The applicant proposes providing two parking stalls, 18 feet in length and an aisle width (maneuvering space) of 22 feet. Sections 4-2206(l ) (A) and 4-2206(l) (C) (2) (a) require a stall length of 20 feet and an aisle width of 24 feet, respectively. 10. The subject lot is 40 feet wide at the western end and narrows in a triangular fashion following the FAI-405 right-of-way in the east. The south property line is 163 feet long and the north property line parallels the south property line for 90 feet before tapering in the triangle. 11 . The house is currently built 6.3 feet from the north property line. The applicant proposes extending the north building line and then angling away from the FAI-405 right-of-way. The new building would abut directly against the south property line. 12. The third parking space is located in front of the garage access door to the storage building and is therefore not a permanent continuously useable parking space. 13. The subject property is zoned L-1 (Light Industry) and the Comprehensive Plan designates the area as suitable for manufacturing park type of uses. The area is in transition from older single family uses to light industrial uses and commercial uses. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . Due to the unique shape of the subject lot coupled with the narrow width, the applicant suffers undue hardship which deprives him of the reasonable use of the subject property. The rear or east end of the subject lot is triangular in shape due to the alignment of the FAI-405 interchange located both north and east of the subject site. In addition, the lot is only 40 feet wide. Both of these conditions justify granting the applicant the variance requested. 2. The 20-foot setback, if observed, would only leave the applicant 20 feet in which to construct the storage facility. This would present an unreasonable limitation on the applicant's ability to use the L-1 zoned subject property. It is unreasonable to expect an industrial use to fit within a 20-foot wide structure. V-uu3-81 Page Three The building will only intrude into the 20-foot setback for a distance of 20 feet, the minimum necessary to afford the appliant relief from the provisions of Section 4-716(a) . 3. The 40-foot width cannot accommodate both a 20-foot long parking stall and a 24-foot wide maneuvering aisle (Section 4-2206(1) (A) and 4-2206(1) (C) (2) (a)) . The applicant has therefore requested with justification a moderation of both those requirements to permit the establishment of the required parking on the subject site. The two-foot reduction in each requirement will not hamper on-site parking efforts and is the minimum necessary to allow the appliant to park vehicles on site. 4. The size, shape and location of the lot adjacent to FAI-405 are unique property conditions and the variances requested will permit the applicant to enjoy the property rights other L-1 zoned properties enjoy. 5. The variances pertain only to on site requirements and will not harm neighboring properties. The FAI-405 right-of-way provides sufficient buffering and landscaping and the public welfare will not be adversely affected by the approval of the variances. DECISION: The requested variances are approved. ORDERED THIS 5th day of March, 1981 . Fred J. K fman Land Use earing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of March, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Thomas Dahlby, 3213 Mountain View Ave. N. , Renton, WA 98055 Cheryl Taback, CH2M Hill , 1500 114th Ave. S.E. , Bellevue, WA 98004 TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of March, 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 19, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. G) Da4/4y C o iei CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3469 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON , CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN . THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (GS-6000) TO LIGHT INDU T IAL DISTRICT (L-1) Q =© =3d WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building .Regulations) of Ordinance No . 1628 known as "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (GS-6000) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about May 1, 1980 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing havin been held thereon on or about June 10 , 1980 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request having been granted and the conditions having been appealed to the City Council of the City of Renton and said City" Council 'having amended the Hearing Examiner 's Decision and said zoning request being in conformity with the City' s Comprehensive Plan, as amended , and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto , and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto , NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON , DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Light Industrial District (L-1) as hereinbelow specified; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance , as amended, to evidence said rezoning , to-wit : Lot 22 , Block 21 , C .D. Hillman' s Earlington Garden Addition to the City of Seattle , Division No . 1 , according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats , Page 74, in King County , Washington, except portion thereof condemned in King County Superior Court Cause 7588361 . 1- Said property being located in the vicinity of 1402 Maple Avenue S .W. ) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-Owners on or about SepLember 8, I*). and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections , Receiving No. 8009080413 and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 15th day of September; . 198Q. Delores A. Mead, vity Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 15t11 day of September, 1980. Barbara Y. 'zinpoch, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J . .Wa en, City Attorney Date of Publication: September 24, 1980 r. a. C-2'Cs‘.... 1r. tip, r W I 1 f--;' r i,.4t i ems I it r.1< a' 4+1J6 r ii 41/4011, - esill t'lNoRsAT Ya61 — 'IIIIIII1 I *or /. 1i11J41ji II I 111\...., 1 N \ 5 RE4'M!V“lL4Gt G` O.7{'!'_ ••.Il 1,11,F,'" •'5I1 :. ' .1 . . 1> '?44fii ,TI Y.....% I •, ,,, c, iTir.i.i•'f TTI ,,, . 8 ..: nil . I I I 1 ry 4III. lll011_,.,9l1ir l 'Il ' f'"i , i I22 14lln h; lull ( 1111' 1111011_11i'' a JIrill.,,;.,i .ilIillllll pi 4 of. r i l'.-t: : ru il.,: W :Fib' l , 'a t` ` . I j o 1, r. • ` r. a i xi.l:x .... i s\. e.J4 y j1 i1 t tom I ... C. i'; W —. 1._J 1' r t` y III /• I . S T._' L.,-......, r....,'` l. +a r.,;' i i'A :11 ir'••..!71 1.''"• '.'•.-"•••2'-....r.7.7..---.C-IiIr..-9-.E:Z.--..--1.•••".:Z• .R.740-lb4Pli OW, if ; 11 ' •••• to,. '''..\ '. r_,_...., ._•••• L J'a______ J., al{ r 1t11iI_T-- v • •i ,- - •iiI O •a. i• - I T •, f.l-t I. 011 t.. . •' s; • is TIIIt +_.. _ _ 9n •+t i `TI I i I a_ •7 S 7W--_ - I ter:--- • ; d 1 4 • 4: .• P 1 p' 1 n i mm., .4, erp2 neeeee 11;-- 71 0^1, i ice_ .—y I t - a •a Q 4 Oi I J I ,t.a._ _ 7 1'1 as p•+ 217 `- TTT—.'" , O I ' ci, w T t_ 1 J 11 ZiI 0I14 11, I I t 1 J Q4 i a iHI1 'il QC . e fie, ,+e .. f I t THOMAS DAHLBY R-044-80 APPL I CANT THOMAS DAHLBY TOTAL AREA _ ,000 sq ft PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Maple Avenue S.W. EXISTING ZONING G-6000i EXISTING USE Existing single family residence PROPOSED USE Rezone to permit use of residence for an office and construct 1 ,000,sq tt storage building COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK r COMMENTS i I t r IA P 4/ 7N 110 12a1 979g RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appli cation : MAMIMCE0,4Ade> ® J Pc0 egyelief'edireaaitecrE4Q0aleet—iiicatOlvt (Oa Location : Igo rhegpie 4ve. Applicant : TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : . ./,.! '. 3 Police Department R. C. MEETING DATE, / Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division I/ Utilities Engineering 4 Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITIN F T APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF Y R DE ARTMENT DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA PROV E THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ----'n Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved er 2-24/ Signature of Director Auth rized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :urri / Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved I/23/8", Signa ure of Director or Authorized Representative Date Jzil9z Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET tt Application : r#WANtre'P.Da 3-g0 'frew, ref reciStfQ4[k ao ' aec . --116fi) le. Location : Nyoa.ntLple 4ve. s W Appl i cant.: DILA% Lip T/l4Mlts J. TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :2/02-0,/... 7 .40/01PoliceDepartmentPR. C. MEETING DATE . : Public Works Department 4 Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department - Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITINE, APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON 1 AT 9 :OU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YO R DE ARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : L X Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved G- z2 -6I Signatur- of Director or A thorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signaturelof Director or Authorized Representative Date A 111om. Planning RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appli cati',on :___VAR/F'JAter 6* 'c /' S°e 4P0 ! (rce e 610 -110 /08 Location :I N®a riftepleittip,„Stij App 1 i cant1: , al-4464*msy TO: _ rks Department SCHEDULED NEARING DATE :_ 4 Police Department R. C. MEETING DATE Public Works Department 1 Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITINf F APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON r ; . ;, AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, IF Ys R DE ATRTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA PROV E THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON f( i REVIEWINGIDEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE xxxxxxx Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Le. D.R. Persson 1/23/81 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING , DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 1 Signature ' of Director or Authorized Representative Date Planning1/u /si 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application :in ga144 rrelyoil%sel ck 0*0', 1 ( se e gq---11600 -iv) to' Location :i ; "®a ale ,41,ye. vStO Applicants: Deoh th ® mS Parks Department r/8/TO: P SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : Police Department R. C. MEETING DATE/ 4.ekg0Er Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITINGGF E APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF VAR DE ARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA PROVI E THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; g,-.72FF/G EN(liE Z/ANG Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved j e- 8/ Signature 'of Director or Authorized RepresentO'tive Date REVIEWINGIDEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representati ve Date Planningifi./ I I 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appli cation : ritiVAAk P®®0 3"T%°e) <g'or" re:brit:rev/sew/4. i ek 4r-f eVo ° (Ace . ci-jumet) • ,--, 10% Location ; 1 ® . Applicant : bald.Ly 1740estoit5 A TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE t"" 4,X' Police DepartmentR. C.0 MEETING DATE/ Public irks Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : I COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITIN Fi l APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :OU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DE ARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA PROVI E THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:0U P .M. ON1i REVIEWINGtDEPARTMENT/DIVISION : x _ 'Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved I zz-/ Signa ure , of Director or Authorized Representative Date VQ,4"-, REVIEWING , DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1 Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature ;of Director or Authorized Representative Date OF R o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ou 61 rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9, 0 co' FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235 -2593 09It SEPSE O, P September 19, 1980 Mr. & Mrs . Thomas Dahlby 3213 Mountain View North Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. R-044-80; Thomas Dahlby Rezone. Dear Mr. & Mrs . Dahlby: At its regular meeting of September 15, 1980, the Renton City Council granted final approval to the referenced rezone through adoption cf Ordinance No. 3369. Sincerely , AU—SA .VO4"'"-- Fred J . Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk offW6 it d.q.\\Ih (31 SEP 22 1980 l, 9A...1-41G pPDf 41/0 Renton City Council 9/15/80 Page 4 OLD BUSINESS - Continued Transportation Transportation Committee Chairman Stredicke submitted committee Committee report explaining negotiated rate for Boeing lease renewal for Boeing Lease the next five years of $. 10 per sq. ft. , which is an increase of Renewal 03 per sq. ft. The report recommended acceptance of the figure increase and that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the supplemental agreement. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Traffic Revision The Transportation Committee explained proposed traffic revision in the area of Main Ave. S. and Houser Way as recommended by the Police Department and Traffic Engineering Department for removal of ten parking stalls on Main Ave. S. so that southbound traffic could occupy two lanes of travel and the direction of traffic on Houser Way be changed to westbound only from Main to Williams creating an additional eighteen parking stalls. The Transportation Committee recommended acceptance of the proposal with the exception that the "restricted on-street parking" remain on Main Ave. S. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND ROCKHILL, concur in committee report. Following discussion wherein access to Renton Hill was discussed and that the proposed traffic revision would cost $1 ,500, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, SUBSTITUTE MOTION, REFER THE ENTIRE SUBJECT TO THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER FOR STUDY AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer submitted committee Committee report recommending concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Virginia Houser to the Planning Commission to complete the term ofAppointmentto James Breda, who has resigned. Mrs. Houser's term will be Planning Commission effective through 6/30/82. Mayor Shinpoch noted Mrs. Houser is not related to former Police Judge Paul Houser. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN APPOINTMENT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee recommended second and final Committee readings of the following ordinances which had been on first Ordinance #3368 reading 9/8/80: Renton School An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification from District Rezone General G-7200 to Residence District R-3 for Renton School District Rezone R-048-80. The property is located on the east side of Benson Rd. S. , south of SW 23rd St. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION FOR ADOPT THE ORDINANCE. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3369 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification from Dahlby Rezone General GS-6000 to Light Industrial District L-1 for property R-044-80 located at 1402 Maple Ave. SW, known as the Dahlby Rezone. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3370 An ordinance was read appropriating $10,000 and transferring the Appropriation funds from Unanticipated Revenue/Current Revenue, Board and Room Jail Operations of Prisoners to Current Fund/Police Jail Budget, Operating Sup- plies. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Resolution #2361 A resolution was read approving the final plat for Glacier Park Glacier Park Co. (See Consent Agenda Page 2) Final Plat FP-069-80; property Final Plat located at southeast corner of Lind SW. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. Upon inquiry by Council , Gonnason noted the question property is within the Green River fill moratorium, but this property has previously been filled. MOTION CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Trimm submitted a petition opposing planting Tree Planting of trees in the parking strip of Burnett Ave. S. The petition Opposed bears 23 signatures of residents of the 400-500 blocks on Burnett. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, REFER TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, drop the tree planting program on Burnett S. Substitute motion failed. MOTION CARRIED TO REFER TO COMMITTEE. 41111 S Riynton City Council 9/ 16/80 Page 3 CONSENT AGENDA - Continued Housing and Letter from the Planning Department , Ed Hayduk, requested a Community public hearing be set for October 6, 1980 to solicit public input Development Needs for the 1981 Housing and Community Development Block Grant Program. Public Hearing The letter explained Federal regulations require the hearing, 10/6/80 that the Citizen's Advisory Committee will study input received at the hearing, plus Staff and other proposals and the recommended program will be presented to the Community Services Committee in November for study and recommendation to Council . Concur. Housing and Letter from the Planning Department , Ed Hayduk, requested authori- Community zation for the Mayor and City Clerk to sign agreement extending Development the City's participation in the 1981-1983 Cooperation Agreement Block Grant between the City and King County for continuation of the Housing Program Extended and Community Development Block Grant Program. Authorize signing. Consent Agenda MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA Approval AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Coulon Memorial Letter from the Park Board and Park and Recreation Director Beach Park Webley recommended award of contract to the second low bidder Contract Award Aldrich & Hedman of Bothell in the amount of $555,582 in the event Moss Construction Company, first low bidder, requests withdrawal of bid due to error. Letter from Moss Construction Co. , Des Moines, requested withdrawal of bid due to $100,000 omission error. The letter explained the Aldrich & Hedman 's bid is within 1 % of the Engineer's estimate of $551 ,483. MOVED BY REED, SECOND SHANE, ALLOW MOSS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY TO WITHDRAW THEIR BID AND THE CITY REFUND THE BID BOND. CARRIED. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND HUGHES ACCEPT THE SECOND-LOW BID OF ALDRICH & HEDMAN AND AWARD BID FOR PHASE IV GENE COULON MEMORIAL BEACH PARK. CARRIED. Ledbury Letter from Diana Ledbury, 511 Stevens Ct. , NW, asked immediate Complaint re attention to potentially dangerous streets where children are Streets walking to the school bus : 87th Ave. S. between Stevens and Lind; Stevens Ave. between 124th and 125th (5th NW) . The letter also noted darkness and closeness to a curve. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND ROCKHILL refer the letter to the City Engineer for study and report back to Council . SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY STREDICKE, SECOND TRIMM, REFER LETTER TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Ivanich VAC-7-80 Letter from Gene A. Maxon, 1220 N 29th St. , attempted to resolve Alley Vacation vacation of portion of alley, VAC-7-80. The letter noted property owners involved have worked together for solution which is to vacate the south six feet of lots 23, 24 and 25; vacate the north four feet of lots 26 and 27 along with the north six feet of lot 28 and leave two foot strip between lots 24, 25 and 26 and 27 which will remain in the City ownership. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND STREDICKE, REMOVE THE SUBJECT FROM THE TABLE. (See 9/8/80 Council Minutes , Public Hearing Page 1 ) CARRIED. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND SHANE, Place subject vacation in the hands of the City Attorney and when papers are signed to his satisfaction the matter is brought before the Council . SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL VACATE THE ALLEY SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Committee of the Council President Trimm submitted Committee of the Whole report Whole recommending that the Council go on record in support of the Metro Ballot Issue Metro Ballot Issue. (Authorizing levy of additional retail sales and use tax for metropolitan public transportation. ) MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. 1981 Budget The Committee of the Whole report recommended authorization of up to $1 ,800,000 in Councilmanic Bonds- the Administration will designate use and Council approval will be required prior to issuance. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN REPORT. CARRIED. OF I y 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U ` Co Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT q co'235- 2550 0' 94), vtk0 September 12 , 1980 SEPSE MEMORANDUM TO : Mr . Dan Kellogg , Assistant City Attorney FROM : Gordon Y. Ericksen , Planning Director By : Roger J. Blaylock , Associate Planner RE : ORDINANCE #3303 It appears that there are serveral faulty legal descriptions included in Ordinance #3303 which rezoned a parcel of property along Monroe Avenue N . E . under File # R-288-78 for Alice Hanby and Kathryn Belan . The legal descriptions were provided by the applicant at the time of application from the assessment roles however , upon inquiry by the adjacent northern neighbor the staff evaluated the legal descriptions for accuracy . It was discovered that the legal description for the first parcel was inaccurate and we would wish to substitute the following legal description in Ordinance #3303 : PARCEL # 1 The west one-half of the west one-half of the South 66th feet of the north one-half of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 9 , Range 5 East , Township 23 North , all located in King County Washington . PARCEL #2 The east one-half of the west one-half of the South 66th feet of the north one-half of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 9 , Range 5 East , Township 23 North, all located in King County Washington . PARCEL #3 The west one-half of the North 66th feet of the south one-half of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 9 , Range 5 East , Township 23 North all located in King County Washington. Memorandum to Dan Kellogg, Assistant City Attorney September 12 , 1980 Page TwIlo It would appear that these new legal descriptions would have to be introduced into ordinance form to modifiy Ordinance 3303 too become correct . It should be noted that subsequently the Citiy has approved a Short Plat of this property based upon the fact that this property was rezoned from GS-1 to R-1 . RJB:yb Renton City Council 9/8/80 Page 3 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Committee report recommended the following ordinances for first reading: Renton School An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of Distr. Rezone certain properties within the city from general classification R-408-80 district G-7200 to residence district R-3. Renton School District R-048-80. Property located on the east side of Benson Road South, south of SW 23rd St. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, TO REFER THE MATTER BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Dahlby Rezone An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of R-044-80 certain properties within the city from general classification district GS-6000 to light industrial district L-1 . Dahlby, R-044-80. Property located in the vicinity of 1402 Maple Ave. SW. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, TO REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Appropriation- An ordinance was read appropriating funds in the amount of Jail Facilities 10,000.00 to operate the jail facilities for the remainder of 1980. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, TO REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Waivers and Councilman Trimm presented letter from City Attorney regarding Deferrals of On handling of waiver and deferrals of on and off-site improvements. and Off-Site MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, REFER MATTER TO THE PLANNING Improvements AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Utility Tax Councilman Shane requested senior citizens with low income not be required to pay utility tax. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, THE ADMINISTRATION STUDY REMOVING THE CITY IMPOSED UTILITY TAX FOR QUALIFIED LOW INCOME SENIOR CITIZENS. CARRIED. Gene Coulon Councilman Reed requested a progress report from the administration . Park regarding status of the Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park project . Cable Councilman Stredicke requested the administration to investigate Television the validity of a municipal corporation operating the cable television system within its city limits , as was recently done by the City of Issaquah. METRO Issue Following discussion it was Moved by Hughes , Second Stredicke to go on record supporting the METRO issue. Roll Call : 3-Aye: Reed, Stredicke, Hughes; 4-No: Trimm, Shane, Rockhill , Clymer. Motion Failed. Councilman Stredicke noted for the record that senior citizens have a discounted rate with METRO. Councilman Rockhill noted for the record that he was not opposed, but felt council should be discussing the item before endorsing and was personally in favor. Councilman Hughes noted for the record he would endorse personally and individually. Winford K. Moore Councilman Clymer noted receipt of letter regarding proposed Exchange of exchange of property with Winford Moore advising a public hearing Property should be held and a fee of $100 paid for street vacation proceedings. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE,TO REFER MATTER TO THE ADMINISTATION TO WORK OUT ARRANGEMENTS WITH MR. MOORE FOR PROCEEDING FURTHER. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Utility Rate Mayor Shinpoch reported Utility Rate Study authorized by Council Study is being accomplished. The firm of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company will review our revenue requirements , accounting systems, cost of allocations, develop rate options, prepare a report and recommend a schedule to the Council . Renton City Council 9/8/80 Page 4 Adminstrative Report - Continued 1981 Budget Mayor Shinpoch reported review of department budget requests and hope to have the Administrative Budget to the Council in late October. Data Processing Mayor Shinpoch also reported Data Processing report is finished and will be available to each Council member. Mrs. Marshall , Mr. Parness, and Mr. Bennett are to serve as the steering committee recommended. The report noted need for a new computer in about two years ' time. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. 9:25 P.M. ZZI.t.Gd- a . Delores A. Mead, M.C. City Clerk EXPI11 $5 CITY OF RENTON DATE 9/08/80 WARRANT DISTRIBUTION FUND TOTAL WARRANTS MACHINE VOIDS : NO . #29941 - #29945 CURRENT 52 151 , 44 PARKS 22, 014 . 46 ARTERIAL STREETS 1, 985 . 00 STREETS 611 , 732, 12 LIBRARY 8, 793. 15 COMP EMP TR ACT 218. 45 STREET FORWARD THRUST 400 , 00 SENIOR CIT CENTER CONSTR 1, 438 . 37 FIRE STATION CONST FUN 14, 726 . 79 G COULON BCH PK CONSTR 16, 727,50 WATERWORKS UTILITY S69, 845, 95 AIRPORT 10, 938 . 97 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 55/ 819. 57 LID CONTROL 14, 246. 86 TOTAL OF ALL WARRANTS 231, 038 , 63 WE, THE UNDERSIGNED MEMBERS OF THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE OF THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL, HAVING RECEIVED DEPARTMENTAL CERTIFICATION THAT MERCHANDISE AND/OR SERVICES, HAVE BEEN RECEIVED OR RENDERED, DO HEREBY APPROVE; FOR PAYMENT VOUCHERS NO. 29946 THROUGH NO. 30115 IN THE AMOUNT OF s231,038.63 C44. 8TM OF SEPTEMBER' 1980. COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN (I' MEMBERR r `;, L';. L . I . D . #312 MEMBER - Revenue Warrant #R-6 $14 , 246 . 86 Form 81 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON, t ss. COUNTY OF KING, C. BELL being duly sworn, says that she is the principal Clerk of Seattle Times Company, publisher of THE SEATTLE TIMES, a daily newspaper, printed and published in Seattle, King County,State of Washington; that it is a newspaper of general circulation in said County and State; that it has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of King County; that the annexed, being a Retail ad was published in said newspaper, and not in a Sourd a.')' supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed in the so irc issue of said paper on the following day or days M a 7 28 , 1980 6. 5 4 Renton Land Use SoviW zo 6 and that the said newspaper was regularly distributed to its^subscribers during all of said period. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON iJ`// A PUBL4C HEARING WILL BE HELD YE THE RENTO LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL J` CHAMBERS)'CITV HALL,RENTON,WASHING. CON. DE .TUNE 1LLOWIWING PETITION. 1 AT 9:II A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING Subscribed and sworn to before me this Second ToomtAsflAMLSY,APyl1G day TONE PROM 0400 TO W, property!ocoted In the vicinity o 1 ape of July 198 0 n Ave.S.W. Legal description of file noted above is on file in the Renton Planning Deportment. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETI- TIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE Nslwy Palk and I the et Washlegton PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 10. 1980, AT 9:00 i le A.M.TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON V.ERICKSEN. RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR PUBLISHED:May 23.1980 4/47/--F 11-) r .':Fra'+L"illr'•;'s ar1..'y,'."F'y : .ai r...:-:;. --- .. Form 81 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON, . COUNTY OF KING, C. BELL being duly sworn, says that she is the principal Clerk of Seattle Times Company, publisher of THE SEATTLE TIMES, a daily newspaper, printed and published in Seattle, King County,State of Washington;that it is a newspaper of general circulation in said County and State; that it has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of King County; that the annexed, being a Retail ad was published in said newspaper, and not in a supplement thereof, and is a true copyof the notice as it wasprinted in thesd Z. ice issue oftnr• ,,..a o said paper on the following day or days May 21 , 1980 11 . 4 5 Notice of Environmental S.urx 2e.Jt Determination and that the said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. NOTICE Of ENVIRONMEN* DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON.WASHINGTON The Environmental Review CamenitNe (ERC) has issued a final declaration of noMsgniNaalce felt the followlew Protects iLri 7 t1.ED LIDZBARSKI (ECT-56i10), application6 f CJ l for building permit in the B-1 and L-1 Die- ff000toffice but constructionprac.rtylocated an am at' 0Vare 110 Subscribed and sworn to before me this Second S.W.Grady Way. 2.CITY day ECF-6S66./01ENTONappliiccatio s DEPARTMENTfforE retenffrom of July 0 to P-1 and temporary permit to allow eon-1% struetlon of buildings to house three fire fighters and an.piece of a elpmont;oreo.r- Natery aRPublicIn d for the State of WashingtonfYlocatedatapproximatelySouth172nd Street and Benson Rood(South Fir.Station r.fidirlg aT Seattle 13). i THOMAS DiNR.$Y tICP44 H01. Ar ming Mara 1141111 to L-to noise log residence to um as on office and con- struction of a 1,000 savors foot storage budd- ing; Property.located In the vicinity of 1002 Maple Av.nw S.W. e.THE BOEING COMPANY(ECF•S61-ID).op. plicotian for Shore Management Substantial Development Permit to allow modification of Mir for hydrofoils;property located on south shorn N Lake Washb*t.n apaoximotely 200 Net east o It,.Cedar River. further information regarding this action Is available in the Planing Department,Municipal Building, Renton.Washington. 2352S50. Any ap- peal of ERC action moot bellied with the Hear- ing Examiner by June 6.11110. Published:May 21.1M0 lat-44,- (-4, • (4:--ef 5-‘37-66) 47C.Z" W447 a OF R4, A. 1$ o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAI BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 n BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9q co- 235- 2550 0, 941 rE° SEPT4O MEMORANDUM August 11 , 1980 TO: City Clerk FROM: Planning Department RE: DAHLBY REZONE - R-044-80 The attached proposed ordinance has been reviewed and is considered accurate except that the rezone classi- fication, GS-6000 ( as it appears in the Title and first paragraph) should be changed to G-6000. The legal description has been confirmed as accurate by the Engineering Division. Attached is a map of the site for inclusion with the ordinance. wr Attachment CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,li CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G$-6000) • TO LIGGHTHTY) NDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (L-) (R-044-c - WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G -6000) ; and WHEREAS. a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about May 1, 1980, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing havin been held thereon on or about June 10, 1980, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request having been granted and the conditions having been appealed to th.e City Council of the City of Renton and said City Council having amended the Hearing Examiner 's Decision and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto , and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : • . SECTION I: The following described property in the City V of Renton is hereby rezoned to Light Industrial District (L-1) as hereinbelow specified; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit : Lot 22, Block 21 , C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats , Page 74, in King County , Washington, except that portion thereof condemned in King County SupeL'ior Court Cause #588861 . 1- is Said property being located in the vicinity of1402MapleAvenueS.W. ) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-Owners on or about August 1980 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections , Receiving No. and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of August, 1980. I Delores . Mea , City C erk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of August, 1980. Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Approved as to form: I Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: i r tipa r1r Wd LW lJl QI I/ G r.Y. 2I Z Lam' i i w- r —ININ! II i jllllllllllllill_II i o IIIIA_I IINn.. . I t"Q,, , C• ; ':i '.LOI ' I g1.Al I rI I r ' .. A. Y •'111 pl+` rw K,;'' U_13!° II=,unik hd ,,;.' i ,i51 . ; i 11111111116dII,::9I , W lu1=' 'ill i.III 11111101 i ' Ili'!": ... ll -1 III. 011101 ' Oil II,,, '." 111110 e t I Qi u-I III /•IIIIII 1 s.i' 11 nllll.11 ;->"'0 t _ .. .-! , s r ir 0 . i`[7Y0yfIp 'a7. 11Ini rut T}t .R• 4 -14114 r i I cam 111.•.13 .- I Ls, • W,u,•- i t ji .5'.II i. 1 Y7tort aw ' - ./ III - r Nr- r__.y r - 4 IIAf r_ 4 •>IFp ar_IF 00 1W1-__- I -Il- -. l • . A a5--- I 18 •i /• I r-- -lrl ;- s••' I F e9 t_,.:1 - •f` 4tj•t--rw 1. ri .i- 3:..:4;,.,_ _ _:: Q, ® Iv u t = 1... ,I . a- i y_ -: -- , :,•,--::-1 !1i ,. .- ,y;.-II—-i 17 I • iLMT/n f y l MtTyr ct 43 i N. •f N u l U 1 I I i i J 11.1 l•• lilt T.foil,.Lam' w „ ,. o a e I I il I23 9 ®Q ' l' r41 Ii I L. I I aHA V l 11} rL____p ag•.IsStt ‘`I.• 11 i2v $i14411"."T' THOMAS DAHLBY R-044-80 APPLICANT THOMAS DAHLBY TOTAL AREA +6,000 sq ft PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Maple Avenue S.W. 1 EXIST I1NG ZONING G-6000 EXIST TINGUSE Existing single family residence PROPOSED USE Rezone to permit use of residence for an off ice• and construct 1 ,000 sq tt storage bui.i,ding COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK I COMMENTS I 1 1 Thomas Dahlby R-044-80 RE Ii/1` DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS O WHEREAS, Thomas R. Dahlby and his wife Kathleen I. Dahlby are the owners of the 114:!.: 0. \ 9 following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, V \ G 1 • e Cribed as follows: wf,. r•'"••••• 4 Lot 22, Block 21, C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat Q'recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, Page 74, in King County,9 tl G / Washington, except that portion thereof condemned in King County Superior Court Cause b588861 . WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS A ten (10) foot landscaped buffer shall be required along th,_ northern property line adjacent to FAI-405. A twenty (20) foot buffer shall be required along the western property line along Maple Avenue S.W. in which no structure or building may be constructed, and of which the westerly ten (10) feet is landscaped. A six (6) foot high sight-obscuring fence shall be required along the southern property line. ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT If the subject lot is developed in conjunction with any adjoining lot, the setback and landscaping requirements of the Manufacturing Park (M-P) zone of the City of Renton shall apply to the property. This condition is not intended to include the state-owned parcel north of the subject lot if that is acquired and developed with the subject lot. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. Thomas R. Dahlby Kathleen I. Dahlby STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING On this day of 19 , before me personally appeared Thomas R. Dahlby and Kathleen I. Dahlby, the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IT WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in 2- e -FP- OF R4, CITY .. OF .RENTON ,S 1 — 0 z THE ` NT MUNICIPAL BUILDING ''200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 i BARBARA :Y' SHINPOCH. MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 0 CITY CLERK 9 O O P176. SEP rTAugust5, 1980 OF k-4,), 9;\, gENED AUG 6 1980 illMr. S'Mrs: Thomas Dahlby `lsr 3213 Mountain View 'North 1 c+ Renton, WA , 98055 tiN!NG DEA RE:-, File No;R-044-+80;: rhomas'',Dahlby Rezone °Appea i ' Dear Mr. & Mrs'.' Dah1by: ''z'.'-'.. . „ µ. ; , ;. The Renton C1,tyCouncil. at',l-ts regular--meeting of August 4, 1980, upheld your;appeal',o ::'che'4a_bove=aaptloned, rezone .and concurred with the Planning.-and Development' Comlttee Report of August 4. A copy of the report is attached ,for,your Information. , ' The restrictive covenants have beenrev,i,sed and are. available in our office your You may"stop by our office between 8100 am and '5:o0 pm', to, sign-the covenants. We will then, forward:the f tie'to'our:City Attorney:to prepare the necessary ordinance. 1. . Yours 'very truly F. CITY OF RENTON 4 . ,;,,," Maxine E. Motor , Y'. i n. ' , Deputy City Clerkgi . HEM:s s Enclosure cc: Mayor. , M Hearing'`Exam'Examiner „ Finance .Di rector t; ' vP1anning''Depar.'tme.nt, it 1h'' r;.. Renton City Council 8/4/80 Page 2 Consent Agenda - Continued Transfer of Letter from Ted Bennett, Finance Dept. , requested transfer of funds Funds- Highlands from repair and maintenance account to capital outlay to replace Fire Station heating system in Highlands Fire Station in the amount of $4,422.60. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Appropriation- Letter from Chief Darby/Capt. Bourasa, Police Dept. , requested Washington Traffic ordinance to appropriate Washington Traffic Safety Commission Safety Commission Grant Funds in the amount of $12,000. Project title: Northwestern Grant University Traffic Institute Training (9 month course of instruction) . Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Lazetti Letter from City Clerk's Office noted King County acceptance of Annexation Lazetti Annexation and its finalization. (BRB#900) Information. Appropriation-Fire Letter from Fire Chief Geissler requested ordinance to appropriate Dept. Insurance insurance settlement on damaged vehicle into Fire Dept. budget in Settlement the amount of $2,860.00. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Fifth & Park Appeal filed by Eugene Horbach re Fifth and Park Place Co. Special Place Co. Permit SP-050-80 and the Land Use Hearing Examiner' s decision Appeal SP-050-80 dated July 30, 1980. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Consent Agenda MOVED BY TRIMM,SECOND SHANE,TO ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. Approval CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS LID 307 Bond Letter was read from Seattle Northwest Securities Corp. re Issue Local Improvement District No. 307 Bond Issue in the amount of 492,768.87. Bonds are to be dated August 1 , 1980 and mature August 1 , 1992 and are to bear interest payable annually at the rate of 9.40%. Finance Dept. recommendation was approval of Seattle NE Securities offer. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ORDINANCE. (See later adoption of Ordinance 0+60) . MOTION CARRIED. Boeing Company- Letter was read from Board of Public Works which recommended Variance request that the variance requested by the Boeing Company be granted for Overhead subject to concurrence by the council.Requested overhead coaxial cables Coaxial Cables cables to provide communications interconnection among various Renton facilities. Approval subject to condition that facilities be under9rounded when undergrounding in the area is accomplished. Mr. McLean of the Boeing Co. handed out a map showing course cable will follow. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND TRIMM, TO REFER MATTER TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Discontinuance Letter was read from Warren Gonnason, Public Works Dept. , verified of LID #318 petition,presented 7/28/80,protesting LID 318 in the amount of 6R, 17? cost N. 30th St.of improvement. Therefore, it was recommended that LID #318 be voided due to 60% or more of property protesting per RCW 35.43. 180. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND CLYMER, VOID LID 318. CARRIED. Joepete McCaslin The Land Use Hearing Examiner recommended approval of short plat, Short Plat 034-80 denial of exception and waiver. Property located west side of E-035-86, W-036-70 Union Ave. NE approximately 1820 feet south of NE 4th St. Appeal Appeal was filed by Joepete McCaslin. Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented committee report finding no error in fact or law and recommended council affirm the decision of the Hearing Examiner. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND REED,TO CONCUR IN THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Dahlby Rezone The Land Use Hearing Examiner recommended approval with restrictive R-044-80 covenants of the Thomas Dahlby Rezone R-044-80, GS-6000 to L-1 . Appeal Property located 1402 Maple Ave. SW. Appeal filed by Kathleen and Thomas Dahlby. Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented committee report finding that the Examiner is in error as a matter of fact in his finding regarding landscaping. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting August 4 , 1980 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P .M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF THOMAS W. TRIMM, Council President; EARL CLYMER, ROBERT HUGHES, COUNCIL RANDALL ROCKHILL, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, JOHN REED, CHARLES F. SHANE. CITY OFFICIALS LARRY WARREN, City Attorney; MAXINE MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk; IN ATTENDANCE MIKE PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; DON PERSSON, Police Dept. ; JIM MATTHEWS, Fire Dept. PRESS Greg Anderson, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF JULY 28, 1980 AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. SPECIAL Mayor Shinpoch presented Arlene Haight with a Certificate of PRESENTATION Competency as a Water Distribution Specialist I issued by the Washington State and Wastewater Operator Certification Board of Examiners, Dept. of Social and Health Services. AUDIENCE COMMENT M.L. Gibson, 1215 N. 29th P1 . , requested fee paid for sewer System Systems Development development on his property should be refunded. (See Ordinance #3456) Proposed Ordinance MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, TO MAKE CITY ATTORNEY'S OPINION Prohibiting Weapons LETTER REGARDING THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE PROHIBITING WEAPONS WHERE Where Alcoholic ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ARE DISPENSED BY THE DRINK A MATTER OF PUBLIC Beverages Dispensed RECORD. CARRIED. Steven Hemmat, 7030 78th SE, Mercer Island, by the Drink representing Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, questioned constitutionality of the proposed ordinance and possible amendment allowing those persons with a concealed weapons t`," permit being allowed to carry. a weapon. Ted Cowan, Maple Valley,7-----V Washington State Sports Council , noted proposed initiative re gun O <yV control .Donald Helens, 5616 So. 144th, Tukwila, noted opposition C •'•4 Y to ordinance as presented. Charles Shaeffer,14032 SE 162nd, Issaquah, i_. is uj noted criminals will still have guns and the law abiding citizens C- Z will not have protection. Emery Wolf, 2305 NE 9th P1 . , noted right J P of the citizens to protect themselves and families. Dale Collier, r 2419 Meadow Ave. No. , distributed newspaper shorts printed from the A 4 American Rifleman pointing out incidents involving use of firearmsl - to prevent crimes in the State of Washington, adding his opinion that ordinance was anti-gun,not anti-crime. Sandy Webb, 403 Mill Ave. So. #3, and Versie Vaupel , 221 Wells Ave. No. both spoke in favor of the weapons ordinance. (See adoption of Ord. i3459, Page 3) Earlington Woods Sylvia Langdon, 312 SW Langston, requested preservation of PUD archeological site of the Earlington Woods PUD Development. Mayor advised steps were being taken to preserve the area. Mrs. Langdon also spoke in favor of the weapons ordinance. Claim for Sandy Webb, 403 Mill Ave. So. #3, requested claim form be sent Damages for damages to his home in January from the sewer system. Also requested report from Engineering regarding steps to correct the problem. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows those business matters included. Bid Opening MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND CLYMER,TO REFER MATTER OF JULY 30TH BID South Fire Station OPENING FOR THE SOUTH FIRE STATION UTILITY AND SITE PREPARATION TO THE Utility & Site PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AS WELL AS FIRE AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS. Preparation CARRIED. 5 bids received. (See attached bid tabulation. ) Earlington Woods Letter from Land Use Hearing Examiner recommended approval with PPUD-052-80 conditions of C.H.G. International , Inc. , Earlington Woods PPUD-052-80. Located West of SW Stevens Ave. , east of South 140th St. between Sunset Blvd. SW and the Burlington Northern right-of-waY.36.3 acres. Council concur. Renton City Council 8/4/80 Page 3 Correspondence and Current Business - Continued Dahlby Rezone Therefore, recommended that the council delete from the R-044-80 recommendation of the Examiner the proposed covenant requiring Appeal a 5 foot landscape buffer and, as so modified, approve the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner and refer to the Ways and Means Committee. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND CLYMER, T6 CONCUR IN THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS COMMITTEE OF Committee of the Whole Chairman Trimm presented committee report THE WHOLE which requested that the Administration prepare a report outlining B & 0 Tax the various aspects of a B & 0 Tax (revenue, percentages, etc.) . The Committee also requested an explanation of the hardship the Utility Tax utility tax places on the people and how much the average homeowner pays from the Administration. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Taxes-Housing Committee of the Whole report also recommended that the subject Authority of "in lieu of taxes" being paid by the Housing Authority be referred to the Budget Committee of the Committee of the Whole. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented report Committee recommending the following ordinances for second and final readings: ORDINANCE #3456 An ordinance was read amending City Code repealing (Ord.3424) Sewer Trunk a citywide 4t per square foot sewer trunk connection charge Connection and establishing a 1t per square foot trunk connection charge and Charge establishing a special assessment district known as Kennydale- Honey Creek Assessment District and establishing a 3t per square foot sewer trunk connection charge for said special district. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES,TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE:TRIMM, CLYMER, HUGHES, ROCKHILL, REED; 2-NO: STREDICKE, SHANE. MOTION CARRIED. (1st reading 7/28/80) ORDINANCE #3457 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of Fire Dept. Rezone certain properties within the City from general classification R-046-80 district (G) to public (medical ,health, fire and education) district P-1 ) . R-046-80 City of Renton Fire Dept. Located east side of Benson Rd. approximately 300 feet north of South 172nd St. MOVED BY CLYMER,SECOND ROCKHILL, TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. (1st reading 7/28/80) ORDINANCE #3458 An ordinance was read amending City Code relating to location of Taxicab Zones taxicab zones. Councilman Hughes noted that Silvertop Cab Co. would be omitting installation of a telephone at that stall . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. (1st reading 7/28/80) ORDINANCE #3459 An ordinance was read prohibiting weapons capable of producing Weapons Prohibited bodily harm on premises where alcoholic beverages are dispensed Where Alcoholic by the drink and imposing penalty for violation thereof. Following Beverages are discussion it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, TO ADOPT THE Dispensed ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.(lst reading 7/21/80) The Ways and Means Committee recommended the following ordinances for first reading: McCaslin Rezone An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of certain R-049-80 properties within the city from general classification district (G) to suburban residence no. 1 (SR-1 ) . Property located at West side of Union Ave. SE approximately 1820 feet south of NE 4th St. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, TO REFER BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Renton City Council 8/4/80 Page 4 Ordinances & Resolutions - Continued Ordering An ordinance was read ordering construction and installation of Construction an 8" water line and appurtenances in the vicinity of S. 132nd LID #317 St. and S. Langston Road, King County, Washington, all in accordance So. 132nd St. with Resolution No. 2341 providing that payment for said improvement and S. Langston be made by special assessments upon property in said district, payable Road by the mode of payment of bonds or notes in lieu thereof as determined by Council ; providing for the issuance and sale of LID warrants redeemable in cash and LID bonds or notes. LID #317. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, TO REFER BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee report recommended the following ordinance for first reading and suspension of the rules advancing it to second and final reading: ORDINANCE #3460 An ordinance was read fixing the amount, form, date, interest LID #307 rate (9.40%) , maturity and denominations of LID #317 Bonds and Bonds and Sale to directing the issuance and sale thereof to Seattle-Northwest Seattle NW Securities Corporation of Seattle, Washington in the amount Securities of $492,768.87. Letter from Gwen Marshall , Finance Director, noted Seattle NE Securities have the first option to purchase bonds sold by the city. (See previous approval & referral pg.2)MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND FORWARD TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE: TRIMM, CLYMER, HUGHES, ROCKHILL, REED; 2-NO: STREDICKE, SHANE. MOTION CARRIED. Following second and final readings it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL,TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE: TRIMM, CLYMER, HUGHES, ROCHILL, REED; 1-NO SHANE; 1-ABSTAIN: STREDICKE. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK BY AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AGREEMENT. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee report recommended adoption of the following Resolution: RESOLUTION #2352 A resolution was read establishing 20t per mile as the reimbursement Mileage rate for authorized mileage. That figure is presently the figure Allowance for accepted by the IRS as ligitimate reimbursement.. The reimbursement Use of Personal rate shall be reviewed annually and shall be increased if the Car IRS allowance for reimburseable mileage is increased or if the IRS does not increase for any year, then the City's reimbursement figure for mileage shall not increase. Councilman Stredicke noted his opposition to allowing for automatic increases. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND TRIMM, TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke voted no.) NEW BUSINESS Segregation of MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND STREDICKE, TO REFER THE MATTER OF SEGREGATION Sewer and OF SEWER AND WATER INCOME TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW. Water Income Following discussion ROLL CALL: 6-AYE: TRIMM, HUGHES, ROCKHILL, STREDICKE, REED, SHANE; 1-NO: CLYMER. MOTION CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch reported Clint Morgan, Traffic Engineer, applied REPORT for funds to the Washington Traffic Safety Committee to update computer-supervised signals, a clerk to monitor DWI cases and Funds from a flashing school zone signs. The first request was approved. Washington Traffic The grant of $11 ,100 is contingent upon continued availability Safety Committee funds, but initial test has been passed. Stop Signs The Mayor also reported that the matter of removing stop signs Kirkland NE on Kirkland NE was accomplished on July 30th. AUDIENCE COMMENT Interest Versie Vaupel , 221 Wells Ave. No. , noted recent attempt to Rates invest money and the interest rates available at that time and felt LID bond interest of 9.40% was high. Renton City Council 7/28/80 Page 3 Consent Agenda - Continued Claim for Claim for damages filed with the City Clerk by Khuyen C. Le Damages - for water damage to basement on July 11 , 1980. Refer to City Khuyen C. Le Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Claim for Claim for damages filed with the City Clerk by Thomas N. Day Damages - for vehicle damage from hitting rut in the roadway on July 13, 1980. Thomas N. Day Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Claim for Claim for damages filed with the City Clerk by Teresa K. Machel Damages - for tire damage from hitting rut in the roadway on July 14, 1980. Teresa K. Machel Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Joepete McCaslin Letter from the Land Use Hearing Examiner recommended approval Rezone of Joepete McCaslin rezone R-049-80, G to SR-1 for property located R-049-80 west side of Union Ave. SE approximately 1820 feet south of NE 4th St. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for Ordinance. Joepete McCaslin Appeal filed by Joepete McCaslin re Short Plat-034-80, E-035-80, Short Plat 034-80 W-036-80 and the Land Use Hearing Examiner' s decision of 7/3/80. Appeal Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Thomas Dahlby Appeal filed by Kathleen I . Dahlby re Thomas Dahlby rezone R-044-80 Rezone R-044-80 and the Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision dated June 19, 1980, Appeal Refer to Planning and Development Committee. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Wells Ave. South Letter was read from Michael W. Gendler , Attorney, re opposition Bridge Replacement of wider replacement of the Wells Avenue Bridge and taking part of Park property. Letter requested investigation to develop alternatives- extent to which repairs to the existing structure or alternative replacement proposals. After discussion it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, TO REFER LETTER TO THE MAYOR' S OFFICE FOR CONSIDERATION AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. Request for Moved by Stredicke, Second Shane, to recess. Roll Call : 2-Aye- Recess Shane, Stredicke; 5-No-Trimm, Reed, Rockhill , Hughes, Clymer. Motion failed. Street Vacation- Letter was read from J. Steve Harrer, Bryn Mawr Properties, Pelly Pl . N. protesting assessment of $2.80/sq. ft. as too high. (Vacation VAC-2-80 of portion of Pelly P1 . N. , VAC-2-80) . The letter requested new appraisal be done. No action taken. Parking Letter was read from Richard A. Burton requesting review of Gene Coulon ticketing and impounding of vehicles and trailers for illegal Memorial Beach parking at the Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park on Lake Washington . Park MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, REFER MATTER TO THE PARK BOARD. CARRIED. Street Vacation- Letter was read from Martin A. Seelig requesting ratter of the SW 23rd St.vacation of SW 23rd Street be referred to the Transportation VAC-4-80 Committee. No action taken. OLD BUSINESS Commendation Mayor pro tem Trimm presented letter from Roy Gervais commending Mayor Shinpoch and the Police Department for the good work they are doing. Sale of MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND STREDICKE, REFER MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION Water REGARDING DIRECT WATER SALES BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE TO PROPERTY WITHIN CITY LIMITS. CARRIED. Community Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented committee Services Committee report which recommended that matter of the setback ordinance Setback be referred back to the Planning Department for review and Ordinance recommendations then forward to Planning & Development Committee. MOVED BY REED, SECOND STREDICKE, TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Renton City Council 7/28/80 P4ge 4 Old Business - Continued Flood Insurance Community Services Committee report noted they will meet with Program, Land Fill various state and local officials, businessmen and citizens Moratorium, Green for the purpose of providing information and status of the River Drainage Federal Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Ordinance, Program Land Fill Moratorium, and Green River Drainage Program on August 20, 1980 in the Renton Council Chambers at 7:00 p.m. Cedar River Trail Community Services Committee report recommended the Council Property move into Executive Session for further report and recommendation Acquisition regarding the Cedar River Trail property acquisition. MOVED BY REED, SECOND SHANE, ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AFTER AUDIENCE COMMENT PORTION OF AGENDA. CARRIED. Federal Insurance Councilman Stredicke inquired as to who paid for the ad Administration- run in the Seattle Times re the Federal Insurance Administration Flooding Areas Rules and Summaries re flooding areas. Mr. Gonnason noted they were paid for by HUD. Park & Ride Councilman Stredicke noted plans are now under way for a North Renton park and ride lot in North Renton by the Maycreek intersection of 1-405. Public Safety Public Safety Committee Chairman Hughes presented committee Committee report requesting matter of the animal control ordinance be Animal Control referred to the City Attorney for recommendation. MOVED Ordinance BY HUGHES, SECOND STREDICKE TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMEN- DATION. CARRIED. Animal Councilman Stredicke requested Animal Control Officer investigate Complaint complaints of baying hound: dogs in the vicinity of 116th (10th NE) east of Union. Appointment Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee Human Rights report concurring in the Mayor's appointment of Antonette (Toni ) Affairs Nelson to Human Rights and Affairs Commission for a two-year term Commission effective 4/25/82. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented report Committee recommending the following Ordinances for first reading: Fire Dept. An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of certain Rezone R-046-80 properties within the City from general classification district (G) to public (medical , health, fire and education) district (P-1 ) . R-046-80 City of Renton Fire Dept. Located east side of Benson Rd. approximately 300 feet north of South 172nd St. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE TO REFER BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Taxicab An ordinance was read amending city code relating to location of Zones taxicab zones. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, TO REFER BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3453 An ordinance was read appropriating funds in the amount of Appropriation- 650,000.00 from the 1980 Unlimited G.O. Bond Proceeds unto the Gene Coulon construction fund. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, TO ADVANCE Memorial Beach ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Following Park readings it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: All Ayes (Councilman Stredicke not present at this time.) MOTION CARRIED. The Ways and Means Committee report recommended the following Ordinances for second and final readings: Fe ,se By City Clerk's Office Ohly A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING a a=== a=====_ SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of 7-28-80 Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. R-044-80; Thomas Dahlby, Consent X Request for Rezone (Request for Reconsideration)Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business Study Session A. Request for Reconsideration, 7-1-80 Other B. Examiner's Response, 7-3-80 C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes_ No N/A X COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval with Finance Dept. Yes_ No. N/A X restrictive covenants as modified. Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner regarding the referenced rezone application was forwarded 'to you on June 26, 1980 prior to expiration of the appeal period on. July 3, 1980. On July 1 , 1980, a request for reconsideration of the setback requirements was received, and the Examiner's response, dated July 3, 1980, modified the specified requirements to be included in restrictive covenants. A new appeal period has now been established to expire on July 17, 1980. If no further appeal is received by the city, all pertinent material regarding this application will be placed on the City Council agenda on July 28, 1980 for referral to Ways and Means Committee for preparation of an ordinance. 7./. 6-_;-'-' F /?.€ J, PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: P C 1 L See 4 of the Examiner's Report.page P JUL '7 1980 SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTAT`I= _ R MEMO->FROM,• CITY CLERK' c .OFFICE TO: DATE: JUL 1 71980. RE: lf, ea./- T`ioz,ias MEMO: THANK YOU, r3 5/V OF RA. 1/- o THE CITY OF RENTON U No Aqop-Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 n NAL a BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 09A GO' CITY CLERK O Q' 91? o SEP1°° c 4 C . tif July 16, 1980 8 AllVs0.o l P .faAPPEALFILEDBYKATHLEENI . DAHLBY RE: Appeal of Land Use Examiner's Decision Dated June 19, 1980, Thomas Dahlby, Rezone R-044-80 To Parties of Record: Appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with the City Clerk this date, along with the proper fee of $25.00, pursuant to Title 4, Ch. 30,City Code as amended. The City Code requires the appeal must be set forth in writing. The written appeal and all other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council ' s Planning and Development Committee. Please contact the Council Secretary 235-2586, for date and time of the committee meetings if so desired. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above—referenced appeal will be considered by the Renton City Council at its regular meeting of August 4, 1980 at 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Second Floor, Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. South. Yours very truly, CITYi OF RENTON " a Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM/st 71: (3( 0r n 11//\ 3 JUL lb 19a0 . 3213 Mountain View North ' Renton, Washington -98055 July 16, '1980 lalc`y 1 4 1 f)t i i, Renton City Council Municipal Building n Cfneof 200 Mill Avenue South fc' C 4EPI10,1j ;} Renton, Washington 98055 lOE;t'?,f. RE: . File Number R-044-80 . . Thomas.•'R.• Dahlby Rezone 1402 Maple Avenue Southwest, Renton, Washington Dear Council Members: We would like to appeal the ±ollowing decision of. Mr . Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner of the City of Renton, in regards to our rezone application :of•.the above stated' property from G-6000 to. L '-I Landscape Requirements A five foot (5 '.) landscaped"buffer shall be: required the southernline.along together with a six foot ' (6 ' ) ' high sight obscuring fence. '" We would like the five foot (5' ). ;'landscaped buffer on 'the ;• ;`: southern property line omitted' as''.'a restrictive covenant' and have the six foot • (6 ' ) high sight-obscuring fence, alone as the covenant :on the. southern property line because: .• 1. It would enable us to use the-property more advantageously. : : : 2. The property to the south is already zoned L-I along with most of the other property in' the-,-immediate area. In the •" future , the property to the south could be developed and, according to the Renton Building.'_Codes, a 'building could..be _ built on the property line which could leave only our ' five foot landscaped buffer between our proposed storage building and future development on the southern property. Since this" covenant will run until 2025 and. no- change can be made, we believe the entire, area will be developed before that time and the property to -the' south -developed into L-I as the area is poor for single family residences due to the high traffic noise level created by FAL:405 . Renton City Council July 16, 1980 Page two If the five foot landscaped buffer is omitted as a restrictive covenant, we propose to construct, if approved , the storage building on the southern property line at the rear of t-ze property. We would construct it of wood keeping the color in earth tones to blend with the surrounding area and screen the front part of the southern property line with a six foot screening fence. S i of e s by Kathleen I . Dahlby TRD/KID/kd K 4 t r 4 Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of August 4, 1980 Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. R-044-80; Thomas Dahlby; Consent Appeal of Examiner's Report.Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution X Old Business X Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach• New Business Study Session A. Letter of Appeal , 7-16-80 Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A X COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: N/A Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A X Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Budgeted Transfer Required $ SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary.) The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner regarding the referenced rezone application was forwarded to you on June 26, 1980. On July 1 , 1980, a request for reconsideration was received, and the Examiner's response, dated July 3, 1980, modified the specified requirements to be included in restrictive covenants. On July 16, 1980, within the required appeal period, an appeal of: the matter was filed with the City Clerk accompanied by a $25.00 fee. You are in receipt of the Examiner's recommendation, the request for reconsideration, and the Examiner's response. Attached is the letter of appeal for review by the Planning and Development Committee prior to placement of the matter on the City Council agenda of August 4, 1980. '. Following determination by Council members of the merits of the appeal , restrictive covenants, if so required, will be finalized. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See page 4 of the Examiner's Report.. SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. OF RE4 cy z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 Z NAL , a f. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9° co FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 OQgTFD SEP1°° March 23, 1981 Mr. Thomas R. Dahlby 1402 Maple Avenue S.W. Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. V-003-81 ; Thomas R. Dahlby Request for Variance. Dear Mr. Dahlby: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved as noted in the Examiner's report of March 5, 1981 , has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Sincerely, 4-1 ‘COAA0H---- Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: , )anning Department City Clerk pf RE REnEDV MAR 23 1981 tiNiN Rc*"Epp/ AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 5th day of March 19 81 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this day of aeL 19 iS1 • Os-VVA gym - 1stbe Notary Public in and for th State of • Washington, residing at enicktrA Application, Petition or Case: Thomas Dahlby; V-003-81 The minuwe4 contain a .Past o6 the paAti 15 of necoad. ) OF 0 . THE CITY OF RENTON 4 Cr z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o 7;. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR a PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9,0 go. 235- 2550 09 , eo May 23, 1980 Thomas R . Dahiby 3213 Mountain View North Renton, Washington 98055 Re : APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G-6000 TO L-1 , File R-044-80, property located in the vicinity of 1402 Maple Avenue S.W. Dear Mr . Dahiby : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on May 12 , 1980. A public hearing before the City of Renton. Hearing Examiner has been set for June 10, 1980 at 9 :00 a .m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present.. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director By : R g r J./Blaylo Associate Planner RJB:wr O F R4 . A THE CITY OF RENTON U ® '.MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH 98055yiev r; BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235- 2550 RTFD 0SEP • February- 6, _ 1981 Thomas_ R. _Dahlby 3213 Mourittlin View North Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Application for variance from the Zoning Ordinance setback requirements (Section 4-716A) and a variance from the Parking and Loading Ordinance (Sections 4-2206 (1 ) (a) ; 4-2206 (1 ) (c) (2) ) to allow the reduction in aisle • width and stall length; property located at 1402 Maple Avenue S.W. Gentlemen: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 12, 1981 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for February 24 , 1981 at 9: 00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours, 1.-- e-ete2fe..9-.-Vet.k Roger J. Blaylock, Associate Planner RJB:yb ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEU COMMITTEE MAY 14, 1980 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10 :00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 1 . NEW BUSINESS : R-044-80 ECF-565-80 THOMAS DAHLBY Application for rezone from G-6000 to L-1 to revise existing residence to use as an office and construct a 1 ,000 square foot storage building ; property located vicinity of 1402 Maple Avenue S .W. SM-80-80 ECF-564-80 THE BOEING COMPANY Application for Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit to allow modification of pier for hydrofoils ; property located on south shore of Lake Washington approximately 300 ' east of the Cedar River. 3213 Mountain View North Renton , Washington 98055 April 30 , 1980 City of Renton Planning Commission Land Use Hearing Examiner Municipal Building Council Chambers Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Rezone Application of 1402 Maple Avenue Southwest, Renton, Washington Gentlemen: I believe the zone change for the above property is appropriate because : 1 . The rezone is in agreement with the City of Renton ' s Comprehensive Plan Map to be zoned Manufacturing Park but because of the size of the lot, I am asking that it be rezoned Light Industrial - the same as a large percentage of the surrounding property (see section of zoning map provided) . 2 . The subject site is at the end of a dead end unimproved street with the property line to the north and east abutting Interstate 405 and j property to the south presently zoned L-I . This makes the property undesirable as a single family residence and the neighborhood shows this by the general deterioration of other single family residences . The property directly to the west of subject site is presently zoned G-6000 for a depth of approximately 135 feet. Directly west and south of this is zoned L-I . 3 . With the rezone approved , the subject site would be upgraded due to remodeling and landscaping plans . 4 . Being a resident of Renton since 1972 , I would like to relocate my business -rom South Park to Renton . Si y s , z, hlby NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON , WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC ) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects : 1 . ED LIDZBARSKI (ECF-563-80) , application for building permit in the B-1 and L-1 Districts to allow construction of an 1800 square foot office building ; property located at 110 S .W. Grady Way. 2 . CITY OF RENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT (ECF-566-80 ) , applications for rezone from G to P-1 and temporary permit to allow construction of buildings to house three firefighters and one piece of equipment ; property located at approximately South 172nd Street and Benson Road (South Fire Station #13 ) . 3 . THOMAS DAHLBY (ECF-565-80 ) , application for rezone from G-6000 to L-1 to revise existing residence to use as an office and construction of a 1 ,000 square foot storage building ; property located in the vicinity of 1402 Maple Avenue S .W. 4. THE BOEING COMPANY (ECF-564-80 ) , application for Shore Management Substantial Development Permit to allow modification of pier for hydrofoils ; property located on south shore of Lake Washington approximately 300 feet east of the Cedar River . Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Department , Municipal Building, Renton , Washington, 235-2550 . Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by June 4, 1980 . Published : May 21 , 1980 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON FEBRUARY 24 , 1981 , AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1 . CHARLES R. UNGER Application of variance from the Shoreline Master Program 20 foot setback requirement, file V-112-80; property located at 3717 Lake Washington Blvd No. 2. THOMAS R. DAHLBY Application for variance from the Zoning Ordinance setback requirements (Section 4-716A) and a variance from the Parking and Loading Ordinances (Sections 4-2206 (1) (a) ; 4-2206 (1) (c) (2) ) to allow the reduction in aisle width and stall length; property located at 1402 Maple Avenue S .W. 3. VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY, INC. Application for rezone from G to M-P, file R-004-81 , to allow construction of State Motor Vehicle Inspection Station for automobile emissions; property located on the south side of S.W. 10th Street between Thomas Avenue S.W. and Lind Ave. S.W. 4. HENRY DAUBERT Application for rezone from G to B-1 , file R-009-81 , to allow potential use as a remodeled office; property located on the northwest corner of Shattuck Ave. So. and S. 7th St. Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON FEBRUARY 24 , 1981 , AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: February 8, 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSONHEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public , in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 6th day of February, 1981 . SIGNED:Sksz7444403"— ir E . G 4156. - CSC EC® W.L.T.A. STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE issued by SAFEC• TITLE @NSURANCE COMPA-,f Y hereinafter' called the Company, a California corporation, for valuable consideration, and subject to the conditions and stipulations of this policy, does hereby insure the person or persons named in item I of Schedule A, together with the persons and corporations included in the definition of "the insured" as set forth in the conditions and stipulations, against loss or damage sustained by reason of: I. Title to the estate, lien or interest defined in items 3 and 4 of Schedule A being vested,at the date hereof,otherwise than as stated in item 2 of Schedule A;or 2. Any defect in, or lien or encumbrance on, said title existing at the date hereof, not,shown in . Schedule It; or 3. Any defect in the execution of any instrument shown in item 3 of Schedule A,or priority,at the date hereof,over any such instrument,of any lien or encumbrance not shown in Schedule 13; provided, however, the Company shall not he liable for any loss, damage or expense resulting front the refusal of any person to enter into,or perform,any contract respecting the estate,lien or interest insured. The total liability is limited to the amount shown in Schedule A, exclusive of costs incurred by the Company as an incident to defense or settlement of claims hereunder. In Witness Whereof, SAFECO Title Insurance Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. 4,7 o RCN,5, 19Secretary o s President Ii111,kjiiF O TP-36 R2 10/75 liable, shall be turntsnea to the u ll u a=b.. — - -structive notice with respect w 5u,u Ran)? at its home office within silly an Yddmindebtednesssecuredthereb , days after such loss or damage with all instruments evidencing or se- office'ofte; ( c) mpany` Iattthecaddress Y have been ascertained. No right of curing the same, and shall convey action shall accrue with respect there-the Company any properly acquired in shown deed herein; of Ct ust otr stcdeed, o or until thirty days after such state full or partial satisfaction of the h b x-.:.,::,i:`.::to.'.un of ..ta irt. _v,.._£,., ters: d.and..cnc.._.._,-.debtedness,___and.all liability of _the other security instrument des;-;ille ri in SCHEDULE A Policy No. : 393780 Amount of Liability: Premium: 136.75 23,000.00 Effective Date: May 26, 1978 at 8:30 a.m. 1. Insured: THOMAS R. DAHLBY and KATHLEEN I. DAHLBY, his wife 2. Title to the estate, lien or interest insured by this policy isvestedin ROBERT A. ANDERSON, an unmarried man, who also signs as ROBERT ALFREDANDERSON 3. Estate, lien or interest insured FEE SIMPLE ESTATE 4. Description of the real estate with respect to which this policy isissued. Lot 22, Block 21, C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to theCityofSeattle, Division No. 1, according to plat recorded in Volume 17ofPlats, page 74, in King County, Washington. EXCEPT that portion thereof condemned in King County Superior CourtCauseNo. 588861. 1 1 Order No. 393780 Page 2 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Contract of sale dated September 30, 1975, and recorded on October7, 1975, in the office of the recording officer of King County,Washington, under recording number 7510070135, Seller: SANDRA E. BAUER, as her separate estatePurchaser: HERBERT H. ABRAHAM and DIANE M. ABRAHAM, his wifeExcisesalestaxpaidunderAuditor's Receipt No. E-322491) . The purchaser's interest was assigned and said premises conveyed byPurchaser's Assignment of Contract and Deed dated May 17, 1978, recordedMay26, 1978, in the office of the recording officer of King County,Washington, under recording number 7805260129, Assignee: THOMAS R. DAHLBY and KATHLEEN I. DAHLBY, his wifeExcisesalestaxpaidunderreceiptNo. E-475141) . NOTE: The seller's interest in said Contract is now held of recordbythevesteeherein. Excise sales tax cleared on receipt No. E-328806) . NOTE: FOR PRINTED SCHEDULE "B" (GENERAL EXCEPTIONS) SEE ATTACHED INSERT. jc rosa lAi Tti6. l ii A 11 s OWNER'S INFLATION PROTECTIVE INDORSEMENT NO. 3 1. The Company, recognizing the current effect of inflation on real property valuation and intending to provideadditionalmonetaryprotectiontotheInsuredOwnermanedinsaidPolicy. hereby modifies said Policy, as follows: 1. Notwithstanding anything contained in said Policy to the contrary. the amount of insurance provided bysaidPolicy, as stated in Schedule A thereof, is subject to cumulative annual upward adjustments in the man- ner and to the extent hereinafter specified. 2. "Adjustment Date' is defined, for the purpose of this Indorsement, to he 12:01 a.m. on the first January 1 which occurs more than six months after the Date of Policy, as shown in Schedule A of the Policy to which this Indorsement is attached and on each succeeding January 1. An upward adjustment will he made on each of the Adjustment Dates, as defined above, by increasing the maximum of insurance provided by said Policy (as said amount may have been increased theretofore under the terms of this Indorsement) by the same percentage. if any. by which the United States De- partment of Commerce Composite Construction Cost Index (base period 1967) for the month of September immediately preceding exceeds such Index for the month of September one year earlier; provided, however, that the maximum amount of insurance in force shall never exceed 175% of the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A of said Policy, less the amount of any claim paid under said Policy which under thetermsoftheConditionsandStipulations, reduces the amount of insurance in force. There shall be no annualadjustmentintheamountofinsuranceforyearsinwhichthereisnoincreaseinsaidConstructionCostIndex. 4. In the settlement of any claim against the Company under said Policy, the amount of insurance in force shallbedeemedtohetheamountwhichisinforceasofthedateonwhichtheinsuredclaimantfirstlearnedof the assertion or possible assertion of such claim, or as of the date of receipt by the Company of the first notice of such claim. whichever shall first occur. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as extending or changing the effective (late of said Policy. This indorsement is made a part of said Policy and is subject to the schedules. conditions and stipulations there- in, except as modified by the provisions hereof. Dated: hay 26 , 1978 at 8 :30 A. .i. Policy No. .71J3 7 o 0 SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CI By _Of Authorized Signature S'' obi So' ob/ 6z 1. S- fz- bi ;/ S 4 5' o/ Jo• 06/ 4E 9Z a b 9¢ Z M z 9 Z ,- 1 z SZ A ( A — -- - --- T ZZ 1 N 0 IL , Ts 6" T. . v 7 7-- A I- n\-- 1. 3 c.: 5,- \. () -'\ - - - A- 4-' 4 0 ,.., F bo' Jbl oC SCIr Sao 4I --- I w 1- 2q-- i i, --,. S, NN1/ 01+ H Q7 i Z1 I I 6 Iwo" 00/— / I , 1 1/ g of MS of iu1 l, win nnnl] d. I 1 nnii - 1. 7 1. 1 1 n' 1 JM. S.-... - OF RA, A A, dl 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR O DELORES A. MEAD 090 co CITY CLERK 09- t 0 SEP- '' O P July 16, 1980 APPEAL FILED BY KATHLEEN I . DAHLBY RE: Appeal of Land Use Examiner' s Decision Dated June 19, 1980, Thomas Dahlby, Rezone R-o44-80 To Parties of Record: Appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner' s decision has been filed with the City Clerk this date, along with the proper fee of $25.00, pursuant to Title 4, Ch. 30,City Code as amended. The City Code requires the appeal must be set forth in writing. The written appeal and all other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council ' s Planning and Development Committee. Please contact the Council Secretary 235-2586, for date and time of the committee meetings if so desired. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-referenced appeal will be considered by the Renton City Council at its regular meeting of August 4, 1980 at 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Second Floor, Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. South. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON off.?? ,.G' /(, . %iewL Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM/st i. R E/V; CW_I) tl U UL 16 155° j ..... .... q\ N/N i 1 i. r• • L: r tlWO h- 1'. V :.N313'Mou fain e2n R ton• W s ingt n98 055 July l 980l 1.' nn.. t` r`t' 1i7 a,1 1 J4 p v y C,Ss ti. r 4 "Renton, C1t Council-.;: e ci a ...Building;,....<...:. .Muni 1 . 1p r ::' t I{ r 0 r:1ttSouth- pMill. Avenue So200M1 C S O iFFCRenton, Washiri ton: 9.$05'5. ne r:q l i Y 1.el's l y i4L' 4: t. R o` R h b ez nee4— TThomas...! Da 1: R— 4 h as`'RE File. Number 0 ,80.:. le- on ton "u uthwest RentWashing1402Maple 'Avenue." So Dear Counc il: M mb r s decisin.We would !like 'to.. appeal:,the :following o 'of Mr Fred J., Kaufman, : Hearing •Examiner of :'.the ';City of Renton in regards. to our rezone' , application- of. the .•above; stated 5y:i,t -I•a+: property from,.G- 000.Leom .6 0'O r,P P Y Landscape Requirements e . r, sigh A fiv foot (5 ',)`? landscapd:;buffer shall required :alon ..the southern Popertyline: I ' t ther ,with a, six •'foot 6t ,hi h si ht- obscuring.,'fence.' in v:, ,,, b f f -. on :theWe. would '.li;ke the" five foot :'.'(5' )::,.',landscaped' u er' southern property'line :'omitted: as °a`restr:ictive covenant _ ';'' ;`:'; , and have :the' six foot': (6' ) •, high: sight-obscuring 'fence:•; alone as the i covenant::On the:'southern': property.,,.line ^ because: It would enable us. .-to use the. ' property more ..advanta eousl ,. , 2. The property to' the south:'is already zoned .L-I, along 'with;• ,.. :!:•. most of the ,other property in::'the`..rimmediate' area.. ' In :the`. future , 'the property to the south,!could be developed.,and, ` according:'to.':the-.Renton :Building >Codes,„. a::building could::be. .. built on the .property .line::which':'co,uld leave" only our:"five ' ` : ;:,.,;:':.,: ~ foot' landscaped .buffer between.:.our;!pr.oposed:`:storage :,building- ‘`..:,'`:: and future development on the: southern ..property. Since,:this:- <," r' covenant will. run 'until , 2025....and:. no' `change:;can be made , •we,;`i`;;.': , s , ':.' believe the entire area will' be developed -:before that. time .:,'. and the:property to', the' south ,developed. into: L-I as the '" •,'`,_ area is poor forasingle family residences due to the high, . .,..:- .'' :••' :- F AI:::405' s. v l "created b Atraffic 'noise':.le e Y: t V, a r Renton CityCouncil. r;July 1 l $o a6 a t9e wo r" If the five foot 'landscaped 'buffpbuffers' is omitted as a restrictive covenant,, we propose toconstruct, if>,: P approved, the storage building on the southern property -line at' the'rear of the ' property. .We would construct•,`it';':of.' wood keeping ' the color:,:` . in earth' tones ,,to, blend, with '::.the: surrounding area and F` . ., screen the front part of • the southern property line with a six foot screening fence. yS 1 1 S 1 y zr 4•N•3•\•,-\ Kathleen 'I Dahlby TRD KID/kdDkd 1 e t!rr 1 2.fir,' , c, For.Use •By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING a smaa a SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of August 4, 1980 Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. R-044-80; Thomas Dahlby; Consent Appeal of Examiner's Report.Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution X Old Business X Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business A. Letter of Appeal , 7-16-80 Study Session Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A X COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: N/A Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A X Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary.) The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner regarding the referenced rezone application was forwarded to you on June 26, 1980. . On July 1 , 1980, a request for reconsideration was received, and the Examiner's response, dated July 3, 1980, modified the specified requirements to be included in restrictive covenants. On July 16, 1980, within the required appeal period, an appeal of the matter was filed with the City Clerk accompanied by a $25.00 fee. You are in receipt of the Examiner's recommendation, the request for reconsideration, and the Examiner's response. Attached is the letter of appeal for review by the Planning and Development Committee prior to placement of the matter on the City Council agenda of August 4, 1980. . Following determination by Council members of the merits of the appeal , restrictive covenants, if so required, will be finalized. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See page 4 of the Examiner's Report. SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. p_zyoF 20 Oi THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o a BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AO co July 3, 1980 FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235 - 2593 9 TE0 SEP-c°' Mr. & Mrs . Thomas Dahlby 3213 Mountain View North Renton, WA 98055 2E: File No. R-044-80; Thomas Dahlby Rezone; Request for Reconsideration. Dear Mr. & Mrs . Dahlby: I have reviewed your request for reconsideration of the restrictive covenants , and my response follows : As you point out, the imposition of the 20-foot setback/buffer along FAI-405 leaves very little, if any, property for development. Under those circumstances , the buffer should be lessened. The Planning and Public Works Departments have considered an amendment to Section 4-716(a) to change the setback for structures to 10 feet , which seems reasonable. Therefore, Condition No. 1 , which reads, "A twenty foot (20' ) landscaped buffer along the north property line adjacent to FAI-405.", is changed to read , "A ten foot (10 ' ) landscaped buffer along the north property line adjacent to FAI-405." The requirement for inclusion of the condition in the form of restrictive covenants will remain in effect . Because the ordinance currently requires a 20-foot setback from the freeway, a variance would still be required to be reviewed and approved by the Board of Adjustment to allow reduction of the buffer from 20 to the 10 feet enforced by restrictive covenants. At the same time, confusion may arise as to the precise limitation of Condition No. 4 , which refers to M-P zone setback and landscaping requirements . This condition is not intended to include the state-owned parcel north of the subject lot if that is acquired and developed with the subject lot. The reason for the imposition of the landscape/buffer setback requirement is to provide compatibility and faithfulness to the Comprehensive Plan , which designates this entire area for Manufacturing Park development. If each lot is developed singly, the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan will not be achieved . At least with uniform landscaping, buffers and setbacks, the area will , in some small measure, achieve the goals of the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan. If this office can be of further assistance in the referenced matter, please feel free to call . A new appeal period has now been established to expire on July 17, 1980. Sincerely, Fred J . Kaufman Hearing Examiner C)\ 3 413 Z C w cc: Parties of Record J l to4- ('.moo - 3213 Mountain View North Renton, Washington 98055 226-6063 July 1, 1980 RgcWi ED CITY OF .RENTON WEARING EXAMINER JUL 1198.0 Pa 7i8r9tImi 2ii s a3,415,6 Mr. Fred J. Kaufman A 1 Hearing Examiner City of Renton . 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr . Kaufman: . RE: Thomas Dahiby Rezone Request 1402 Maple Avenue S. W. , Renton File Number R-044-80 In regards to the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants prepared by your office covering the property at 1402 Maple Avenue Southwest, we would like to request reconsideration on the following requirement: A twenty foot (20 ' ) landscaped buffer shall be required along the northern property line adjacent to FAI . 405. As you can see, if all the landscape requirements are met, the property is worthless as a building site as it is only 40 feet in width at the. westerly portion of the property and after the requirements there would be only 15 feet of width to build. (See attached Staff Comments from the Planning Department' s Preliminary Report) . We believe a .building as we propose and some landscapingwouldupgradetheareagreatly. As we have previously stated, the property site is undesirable as a residential home due to the high traffic noise of FAI 405 . The site is too small ' for Manufacturing Park zoning. As I stated in the hearing , prior to purchasing the propertyinJune, 1978, I visited both the Planning Division and the Building Department of. the City of Renton and no mention was made of the 20-foot landscaped setback being required adjacent to FAI 405. Mr. Fred J. July 1, 1980 Page two We would like the opportunity to apply for a variance to the 20-foot setback from the FAI 405 right-of-way and have been informed if this restrictive covenant was applied to the site, an application for a variance would not be available to us. • Therefore, we are requesting you to reconsider this covenant. Since ly yo r , Kathleen I. Dahlby Enclosure TO J un eNl `A OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER t • / CITY OF RENTON t6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. NNII%1G APPLICANT: Thomas Dahlby FILE NO. R-044-80 LOCATION: Vicinity of 1402 Maple Avenue S.W. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests a rezone of the subject site from G-6000 to L-1 to permit use of an existing residence for an office and to construct a 1 ,000 square foot storage building. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval with restrictive covenants. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval with restrictive covenants . PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by REPORT: the Examiner on June 4, 1980. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report , examining available information on file with the application , and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on June 10, 1980 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed the report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File including Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: King County Assessor 's Map Mr. Blaylock indicated that the subject lot was originally much larger than its current size, but due to construction of FAI-405, approximately one-third of the property was eliminated which created an irregular, triangular-shaped rear boundary. He also noted that not all of the right-of-way is currently utilized for the state highway interchange, leaving sufficient area for expansion. Referencing Section 4-716(a) of the Zoning Code, which requires a 20-foot setback from a primary state highway, Mr. Blaylock advised that opportunity is available to the applicant to request a variance from that provision. Mr. Blaylock corrected Section M.3 of the Planning Department report to reflect the minimum height of the required view-obscuring fence as six feet in lieu of eight feet as denoted. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant . Responding was: Thomas Dahlby 3213 Mountain View Avenue N. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Dahlby discussed the timeliness of the request for rezone due to similar zoning designations in the surrounding area. He reviewed the development, problems incurred as a result of the narrow, 40-foot width of the lot, coupled with requirements for 20- foot setbacks on the northern and eastern boundaries. He indicated that other requirements delineated by the Planning Department pertaining to landscaping and screening were acceptable. Mr. Dahlby apprised the Examiner of the absence of landscaping on similarly zoned properties surrounding the subject site, citing only one development located on the corner of S.W. 16th Street and Maple Avenue S .W. which has provided appropriate landscaping. Referencing Section F. 1 , Public Services, of the Planning Department report, Mr. Dahlby inquired regarding availability of sanitary sewer lines on S.W. 16th Street in lieu of Lind Avenue S.W. Mr . Blaylock indicated that a proposed LID on S.W. 16th Street includes extension or upgrading of lines, but maps obtained from the Utility Division denote the R-044-80 Page Two existence of sewer lines only on Lind Avenue S.W. The Examiner clarified that the staff report states that a 24-inch' sanitary sewer runs east-west on S.W. 16th Street within one-half mile to the west, and ends one-half mile from Lind. Mr. Dahlby advised that upon purchase of the subject property in June, 1978, he had contacted both the Planning and Building Departments regarding proposed development . At that time, he noted, there was no mention of the required 20-foot setback from FAI-405, and the Planning Department, in fact, had recommended only a screening and planting area along the north property line. The Examiner's response indicated the possibility that the requirement had been overlooked at the time, but the ordinance had been amended in 1971 , and Section 4-716 specifically states the requirement for a 20-foot setback from a primary state highway. The section was read into the record by the Examiner as follows : Section 4-716(a) AZE. bui dLngis, istAuctune4 and/on. uzeb o.6 every type and deAnip i.on abutting on, pLonti.ng on a Pi-Lmany State Highway within the City 4hatt maintain 'a twenty boot (20' ) .setbaefz {ynom theL't Aot. tinez; The Examiner requested confirmation from the applicant that the right-of-way commences at the location of the existing cyclone fence adjacent to the subject property on the north side. Confirmation was provided by Mr. Dahlby. The Examiner then •advised the applicant that .opportunity is available to apply for a variance from that requirement to the Board of Adjustment; however, he was uncertain if a variance could legally be granted from the provision since it is unknown at this time if it • is a state or city requirement . Mr. Dahlby inquired regarding a small , triangular piece of property to the northwes.t. of the subject property which belongs to the state, and .if acquired, could be utilized for accessory parking . Mr. Blaylock described the referenced property on Exhibit #2, and noted that a rezone must be processed to revise the current designation of G-6000 to an appropriate zoning district. The Examiner inquired if the parcel As part of state right- of-way. Mr. Dahlby indicated that although it is not included as right-of-way, it Is property owned by the state. Mr. Blaylock clarified that the small parcel was acquired by the state because it 's use was destroyed by construction of FAI-405. The Examiner noted that if legal publication had included the parcel , rezone of that property could have occurred concurrently with the subject site. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then requested final comments from the Planning Department representative. To afford the applicant the opportunity to apply for a variance from the setback requirement to the Board of Adjustment, Mr. Blaylock deleted Section M. l .a. from the departmental- recommendation, which denotes a requirement for a 20-foot setback from the FAI-405 right-of-way, noting that if the condition were enforced by restrictive covenants, application for a variance would no longer be available to the applicant. The Examiner requested further comments . Since there were none, the hearing regarding File No. R-04.4-80 was closed by the Examiner at 9:30 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a reclassification of +6,000 square feet of property from G-6000 (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 6,000 square feet) to L-1 (Light Industry) . 2. The application file containing the application , SEPA documentation , the Planning Department report , and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #l . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R,C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been' issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental_ Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed' by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. The Subject site is located at 1402 Maple Avenue S.W. adjacent to FAI -405 which exists along the north and northeast boundaries of the subject site. The site is generally level and is occupied by a single family dwelling. R-044-80 Page Three 7. The subject lot was annexed into the city in 1959 at which time the current zoning classification of G-6000 was applied. 8. The site lies on the east side of the. north end of Maple Avenue S.W. which deadends in this location as it abuts FAI-405. There is a small , irregularly-shaped parcel owned by the state and not part of the FAI-405 right-of-way located immediately between the subject site and FAI-405 at the western end of the site. 9. On both sides of Maple, the block front is a mix of uses including older, small single family dwellings , and small , commercial/industrial uses. 10. The zoning in this area consists of a mix of categories which mirror the current uses. The subject site and the three single family lots across Maple from it are zoned G-6000. The five lots directly south of the site and those diagonally across Maple are zoned L-1 . Southeast of the site across S.W. 16th Street the lots are zoned G (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 35,000 square feet) . There is a large expanse of land south of the subject site which is currently zoned H-1 (Heavy Industry) . There are also a couple of parcels which are zoned M-P Manufacturing Park) west of the site. II . The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of Manufacturing Park type uses. Similarly, the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan designates the area for Manufacturing Park. 12. The applicant has requested that the zoning be changed from its current G-6000 to L-1 and has submitted a conceptual site plan which is not binding but has indicated potential conflict with. Section 4-716(a) which requires a 20-foot setback from primary state highways. FAI-405 is designated a primary state highway. 13. The Planning Department has recommended that if the rezone is approved as requested that the applicant provide landscape and setbacks to comply with the goals and objectives of the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan. This would require a 20-foot front yard setback on Maple. The 20-foot setback adjacent to FAI-405 and a five-foot buffer between the subject site and the southerly single family residence would also be required. 14. The L-1 lot to the south is still occupied by a single family dwelling and the Planning Department has recommended that the site be screened from the more intense zoning proposed by the applicant . The lots across the street are still G-6000 and occupied by dwellings, and the front yard setback of 20 feet is proposed to separate them from the effects of the L-1 zoning use. 15. The applicant has proposed maintaining the single family structure for use as office space and has proposed construction of a storage building to the rear. 16. The applicant must comply with the requirements of the various codes and regulations of the city including parking, sewer, storm drainage as well as the requirements of the Zoning Code. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare, and that it complies with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The applicant has demonstrated that the necessary criteria have been met to permit the reclassification of the subject property. 2. The area is one which is in transition from older single family dwellings to commercial and industrial uses. Many of the lots in the area are currently zoned for light industrial uses although they have not all been converted from residential to commercial or industrial uses. Other lots on both sides of the street have already been converted to more intense commercial and industrial uses. R-044-80 Page Four 3. The area to the south is the site of the large industrial complex being developed in the Orillia industrial area. An LID has greatly upgraded Lind Avenue S.W. just west of the site. Access to FAI-405 is reasonably close as is access to the West and East Valley Road systems. 4. The size of the site, its close proximity to FAI-405 and the continuing residential uses adjacent to the site all place constraints on the use of the subject site which must be recognized in any potential rezone in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. While the Comprehensive Plan designates the site for manufacturing park type of . complexes , small individual lots cannot comply with the setback requirements and maintain useable space for development. The L-1 category requested by the applicant will permit the establishment of reasonable light industrial uses on the site but will not require the large, 60-foot setback provided in the M-P zone. L-1 zoning will also prevent the establishment of the heavier industrial uses generally permitted in an M-P zone adjacent to the single family dwelling which currently occupies the site to the south of the subject property. 5. In order to afford the protection the less intensely developed parcels require across from and adjacent to the subject site, sufficient setbacks and landscaping must be employed. The general front yard setback in this area already is twenty feet from the street , and establishing this as a condition of the rezone would maintain the existing building line. It would also protect the appearance of the street as required by the Green River Comprehensive Plan and protect the single family uses across the street from the potential industrial uses on the subject site. The south side yard could, be effectively fenced and landscaped to provide privacy and buffering . for the single family dwelling located south of the subject property. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the reclassification of the zoning of the subject property from G-6000 to L-1 as requested by the applicant subject to the execution of restrictive covenants which provide: 1 . A twenty foot (20 ') landscaped buffer along the north property line adjacent to FAI-405. 2. A twenty foot (20' ) buffer along the west property line along Maple Avenue S.W. in which no structure or building is constructed and of which the westerly ten (10) feet is landscaped. 3. A five foot (5 ') landscaped buffer along the south property line together with a six foot (6') high sight-obscuring fence. 4. The setback and landscaping reauirements of the M-P zone shall apply if the subject lot is developed in conjunction with any adjoining lot . A a Fred J . Kauf a Land Use Hear g Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of June, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Thomas Dahlby, 3213 Mountain View Ave. N. , Renton, WA 98055 Douglas Allen, 4415 S.W. Hill , Seattle, WA 98116 Delores Hagerty, 326 Union Avenue N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of June, 1980 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon' Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Supervisor Lawrence J . Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV , Section 3015 of the City' s Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before July 3, 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure , errors of law or fact , error in judgment , or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasoridbly available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days from the date of the Examiner 's decision. This request ;hall ,,et forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant , and the Examiner may , ufte.r review of the record , take further action as he deems proper. R-044-80 Page Five An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. J77 p t t I 1 I H - I ZIP TRANS ai I1 I r14 ,12FV'„. '' lAG• P I-" 4 . f}3..4•a•r1 • It , ' 4' 4sS• y. J, i1'•I ,L, 11N ii t ,U M 1 lit,- n. y., d,TT r 1 • llf ru ( ,or .re' 1WIT. , .may 1 4/{'+ ll ' Q .; • y/ d I 7 lam' j -7_1 1', a A, t:fit r I,f . F s t A Iy,r s fir} `':t1i ij sim ,W- T,Leh fiT.1 .• a IllA ---=i t a•1., at if 45 u,, l ,,, F; ^ '-- I. -- ' , , y11_... : '. yr...i : .L 1• . .:<C fit( •1• V G 4O -.<'- - i , .... . ,,;, .1 • •.. e'! t M .1:`_a1 . s i.. 1- • ..' i ..:- •'Q. of y VaftgOVV 1I id` , - e._.- 1..\11. •A '.(--- ' ill --r :.i.,.. , D, o,, . „,,,. .. „.: ,,, I 311 ' 4 tj, II ,1. .. ,Q i l . . . 7 ,q p, _T 7 I. 3 1C/F—} Y 4,- i ; .L..., ,, ,,,,,, • ttr..i PI 1Il j r I I 4i--- C L- + ','" I ,„ •7 .I :.a ' O :' 'tom • . r 1 1 ., I „ . P .fl /t • ' to ' • irIL . _1 --1L..L_.i t -- 1. -" e. ; u et ,e' i! 4, . ; • 4 .'... : ; . : , 1\ 74.--t '.04 ;. 4., H'',, se 1 Li P. 'i \-, . c. - ''. 4-'- '1"-L.J: It! '.. ;;k.,, . ', , V:.' ''S'7.' G.,..9600 , THOMAS DAHLBY R-0 th-80 APPL I CANT THOMAS DAHLBY TO1 AL AREA ±6,000 sq f t --- PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Maple Avenue S.W. EXISTING ZONING_—__ G-6000 EXISTING USE Existing' si.ngllee family residence . PROPOSED USE Rezone to permit use,-of residence for .an office •and construct. I ,000 sq tt storage building COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTUR I Nil PARK COMMENTS March 5, 1981 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION , APPLICANT: Thomas R. Dahlby FILE NO. V-003-81 LOCATION: 1402 Maple Avenue S.W. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks a variance composed of two parts: 1 ) Reduction of the required building setback of 20 feet from the northerly property line (Section 4-726A) to 10 feet; and 2) Reduction of the parking aisle width from 24 feet Section 4-2206(1 ) (C) (2) (a)) to 22 feet and the stall length from 20 feet (Section 4-2206(1) (A)) to 18 feet. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by REPORT: the Examiner on February 19, 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on February 24, 1981 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department preliminary report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Plan Exhibit #3: File No. R-044-80 (by reference) ; Approved Rezone for Subject Site The Examiner noted concern that refusal by the state to sell the right-of-way may indicate plans for future expansion of the freeway which would support retention of the 20-foot setback. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Thomas Dahlby 3213 Mountain View Avenue N. Renton, WA 98055 Responding to the Examiner's concern regarding the state owned parcel to the north of the subject site, Mr. Dahlby advised that he had directed a letter of inquiry to the state but a response has not yet been received. He indicated the recommendation of the Department of Transportation to surplus the property because it is unlikely it will be utilized for expansion, but a time and date certain for resolution of the matter has not been established, and a decision may take several months. Mr. Dahlby indicated that due to the irregular shape and size of the lot, a variance to reduce the setback to 10 feet had been requested in order to provide a well-designed building which is functional and complementary to the area. He advised that the property to the south of the site which is a mixture of residential and commercial uses is vacant and available for sale. The Examiner requested further testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then invited final comments from the Planning Department staff. Since no further comments were offered, the hearing regarding File No. V-003-81 was closed by the Examiner at 9:17 a.m. 003-81 Page Two FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: I . The request is for approval of variances from the provision of the Zoning Code requiring a 20-foot setback from a state highway and from the provisions of the Parking and Loading Ordinance requiring a 24-foot aisle width and 20-foot stall length. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, the subject proposal has been determined exempt from the threshold determination by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 6. The subject property is located at 1402 Maple Avenue S.W. immediately south and west of FAI-405. The site is essentially level and an existing single family home is located on the site. The house will be converted to office use. 7. The subject property was annexed into the city in 1959 by Ordinance No. 1745. The G (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 35,000 square feet) zone applied at the time of annexation was changed to L-1 in September of 1980 by Ordinance No. 3469. 8. The applicant proposes to construct an addition to the existing house to provide an industrial storage building. The new addition will be approximately 1 ,500 square feet and would encroach approximately 10 feet into the required setback from state highways required by Section 4-716(a) . The applicant has therefore requested a variance from the setback provision. 9. The proposed use requires three parking spaces. The applicant proposes providing two parking stalls, 18 feet in length and an aisle width (maneuvering space) of 22 feet. Sections 4-2206(l ) (A) and 4-2206(l) (C) (2) (a) require a stall length of 20 feet and an aisle width of 24 feet, respectively. 10. The subject lot is 40 feet wide at the western end and narrows in a triangular fashion following the FAI-405 right-of-way in the east. The south property line is 163 feet long and the north property line parallels the south property line for 90 feet before tapering in the triangle. 11 . The house is currently built 6.3 feet from the north property line. The applicant proposes extending the north building line and then angling away from the FAI-405 right-of-way. The new building would abut directly against the south property line. 12. The third parking space is located in front of the garage access door to the storage building and is therefore not a permanent continuously useable parking space. 13. The subject property is zoned L-1 (Light Industry) and the Comprehensive Plan designates the area as suitable for manufacturing park type of uses. The area is in transition from older single family uses to light industrial uses and commercial uses. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . Due to the unique shape of the subject lot coupled with the narrow width, the applicant suffers undue hardship which deprives him of the reasonable use of the subject property. The rear or east end of the subject lot is triangular in shape due to the alignment of the FAI-405 interchange located both north and east of the subject site. In addition, the lot is only 40 feet wide. Both of these conditions justify granting the applicant the variance requested. 2. The 20-foot setback, if observed, would only leave the applicant 20 feet in which to construct the storage facility. This would present_an unreasonable limitation on the applicant's ability to use the L-1 zoned subject property. It is unreasonable to expect an industrial use to fit within a 20-foot wide structure. V-01 31 Page Three The building will only intrude into the 20-foot setback for a distance of 20 feet, the minimum necessary to afford the appliant relief from the provisions of Section 4-716(a) . 3. The 40-foot width cannot accommodate both a 20-foot long parking stall and a 24-foot wide maneuvering aisle (Section 4-2206(1) (A) and 4-2206(1) (C) (2) (a)) . The applicant has therefore requested with justification a moderation of both those requirements to permit the establishment of the required parking on the subject site. The two-foot reduction in each requirement will not hamper on-site parking efforts and is the minimum necessary to allow the appliant to park vehicles on site. 4. The size, shape and location of the lot adjacent to FAI-405 are unique property conditions and the variances requested will permit the applicant to enjoy the property rights other L-1 zoned properties enjoy. 5. The variances pertain only to on site requirements and will not harm neighboring properties. The FAI-405 right-of-way provides sufficient buffering and landscaping and the public welfare will not be adversely affected by the approval of the variances. DECISION: The requested variances are approved. ORDERED THIS 5th day of March, 1981 . Fred J. fman Land Use hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of March, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Thomas Dahlby, 3213 Mountain View Ave. N. , Renton, WA 98055 Cheryl Taback, CH2M Hill , 1500 114th Ave. S.E. , Bellevue, WA 98004 TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of March, 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 19, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. 079 Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appli cation : J 7.p/t,e (A - 09040) 6 6Q0_0A, b /. /'eti%$ ek(417,e.fieleofee 72l Gse 454E01 of,/e reoles/Ne A (04046dfalei ;• Location : Øci,ii le), Del'OO.eoti/cam Ave. Applicant.: ILIA !Oy1 TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED NEARING DATE : //318c' Police Department A. R, C. MEETING DATE : 5/2$V8d 1 Public Works Department FRC . r l tsL Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON s e/SO AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date i 6 TN.S., till. 4 Vila 414 ma IV., i i A 117. . . i 1 . 1 a t .. LI c,. .. 41 • i jf.. . 4 t..."' 1 • . P 1 t'... 1111 ,4. 1100' r- •. 7. 0.......•-= ' vs& iisti, 4.2 ,e. ,.;._ II --' virtii. 411. a 1116,41111:.: , r. k.....'. • • *. . . ....• '., Arta*kir,••••4;;;0411. , 0•40.31/.Na• .., • " ..... • 4,'API'll •:....",' ..;•••••• ,iii.... .0'1"144/..-i 4iitilimii : aniptirk• 10rair..„.•1 or. -7C. s 7::., e..., . 1 A. S', ...• . ' , hi lilt 11111 li0,. —...-- P ' v •- '"--.0""'"'""-— - - „ m. 41 4 il• VI. '''....•'•4.# r 1! ,.,;.,,,*i•..;. '`'.•"§ ••!.. i Er it.:•Aph*. i 11111Wimart, . -11111 ';',01 4.4.. . ,,41111111 a a S•- 110111MIII• MA xi f •lo•-• ....immet.,.... r . 0 s ',., A. 3+ 0. • _ems.- 411teltk.IT am:- 4.4.---SUBJECT SITE figt41L.4111--- III iiiiifflIfilliNA 4.,,, .., •r", rw re ft srArg mop AM' i PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JUNE 10, 1980 APPLICANT : THOMAS DAHLBY FILE NUMBER : R-044-80 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests a rezone of the subject site from G-6000 to L-1 to permit use of an existing residence for an office and to construct a 1 ,000 square foot storage building. B . GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record : THOMAS R. DAHLBY 2 . Applicant : THOMAS R . DAHLBY 3 . Location : Vicinity Map Attached) Vicinity of 1402 Maple Avenue S.W. 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5. Size of Property : 6 ,000 square feet 6 . Access :Via. Maple Avenue S .W. 7 . Existing Zoning : G-6000, Residence Single Family , minimum lot size 6 ,000 square feet 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area: G-6000 ; L-1, Light Industrial 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Manufacturing Park 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on May .28 , 1980 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on May 30 , 1980 . C . HISTOW:SAC( IGRBOQDIND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1745 ofApril 14, 1959 at which time the present zoning classification was applied . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : THOMAS DAHLBY , R-044-80 JUNE 10 , 1980 PAGE TWO D . PHYSICAL 194CK GROUNID: 1 . Topography : The subject site is relatively level . , 2 . Soils : Urban Land (Ur ) . This soil has been modified by disturbing the natural layers with the addition of fill to accommodate industry. 3 . Vegetation : The subject site consists primarily of tall grass , blackberries and brambles with a few medium growth shrubs along the westerly frontage . 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site may provide some habitat for birds and small mammals. 5 . Water : No surface water was evidenced on the subject site (May 30, 1980) . 6. Land Use : The subject site consists of an existing single family residence . To the south and to the west are single family residences , also I-405 is adjacent to the north and east. E . NfEIM®Rff9®DD CHARACTERISTICS : The general area is in a transitional nature from undeveloped and single family residence property to commercial and industrial uses . A small unuseable lot lies between the subject property and I-405 to the north . F . MIMIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : A 12" water main extends north-south on Maple Avenue S .W. adjacent to the subject site and a 24" sanitary sewer runs east=west on S .W. 16th Street within one-half mile to the west . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route #161 operates along S .W. 'Grady Way within 4 mile to the northwest of the subject site . 4. Schools : Although the site is within the Renton School District , no existing schools are located in the general area. 5. Recreation : No existing parks are located near the subject site. G . APPd.ICACLIE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-729 ; G, General Classification District . . 2 . Section 4-712 ; L-1 , Light Industry District . H . APPfLICA31 LE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITE' DOCUMENT: ' 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan , June 1976 , Objectives , Pages 5-7 . I . IMPACT OF THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Minor . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : THOMAS DAHBLY , R-044-80 JUNE 10 , 1980 PAGE THREE 2 . Population/Employment : A very minor increase in employment can be expected . 3 . Schools: Minor . 4. Social : Minor . 5 . Traffic : Construction of the storage building would generate 53 additional vehicle trips per day . Conversion of the existing single family residence to office use would result in 6 additional vehicle trips per day for a combined increase of 59 trips per day. J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance_• and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject.rezone by the Environmental Review Committee on May 21, 1980 . The appeal period expired on June 4, 1980. K . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The proposed rezone to L-1, Light Industrial , is not directly in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element designation of Manufacturing Park for the subject site. However , the City has approved a number of rezones in the vicinity to Light Industrial subject to restrictive covenants designed to be compatible with the objectives of the Valley Comprehensive Plan . These rezones include Ordinances 2425 (August 1968) ; 2559 (April 1970) ; 2590 (October 1970 ) 2594 (October 1970) ; 3053 (August 1979 ) ; and 3270 (December 1978) . These actions would indicate that the subject site is potentially zoned for the L-1 classification being sought (Section 4-3014-B) . 2 . The subject site is in an area which is in transition from older single family residences to commercial/ industrial uses . Older single family residences are located to the south and west , while the freeway is to the north and east. 3. The applicant has submitted a site plan with the proposed rezone . The site plan does not comply with Section 4-716 (A) of the Zoning Ordinance which requires a 20-foot setback from a primary state highway . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : THOMAS DAHBLY, R-044-80 JUNE 10 , 1980 PAGE FOUR 4. Within the vicinity , three rezone applications have been approved for L-1 uses subject to conditions very similar to those recommended by the Planning Department (O ' Brien , R-885-76. and Divelbiss , R-016-77 and Dalpay , R-143-78) . These applications are all on the north side of FAI-405 ; however , they are on similar sized lots . The conditions imposed upon the Dalpay property were : a . A minimum 20-foot setback along S .W. 12th Street ; a minimum 10-foot setback along the east property line ; and a minimum 10-foot along the north property line . b . A minimum 20-foot landscaping strip adjacent to S .W. 12th Street ; a minimum 10-foot landscaping strip adjacent to the east property line ; and minimum 10-foot landscaping strip adjacent to the north property line . c . Outside storage of materials , equipment and containers may be permitted within the buildable area of the property, when said storage is properly screened by site-obscuring fence not less than 6 feet in height nor more than 10 feet in height together with a minimum 5-foot landscaping strip subject to review and approval of the Planning Department . These dimensions were placed on the subject rezone to comply with the intent of the Manufacturing Park zone . It would appear that in this case the screening of the single family residence on the southern boundary of the site can be obtained by the creation of a solid wood screen fence along with a 5-foot wide landscaping setback utilizing a heavy planting of canopy-type trees . This will screen the upper portion of the proposed commercial building from the single family residence . The 20-foot setback required by Section 4-716 (A) is required primarily to allow for future expansion of the primary state highway . In this case , the right-of-way for the state highway is excessive because it ' s adjacent to a major cloverleaf interchange which not vary in the future . Therefore , the 20 feet could be utilized as extensive landscape screening . The front yard setback of 20 feet is met in this case ; however , the parking necessary for the facility could not be placed on the lot without obtaining a variance from the Board of Adjustment . Normal parking requires a minimum width of 49 feet--the," lot is only 40 feet in width . 5. Off-site improvements and on-site retention of storm drainage will be required for Engineering Division comments . 6. The Fire Department advises that a pre-construction conference with the Fire Marshall will be required and future development shall meet all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of Renton relative to fire safety . 7. The evidence indicates that the subject site was not considered during the last reclassification of the area thus complying with Section 4-3014(A) (1 ) of the Hearing Examiner Ordinance . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : THOMAS DAHLBY , R-044-80 JUNE 10, 1980 PAGE FIVE Eventhough the subject site is not specifically designated on the Comprehensive Plan as Light Industrial Uses , the intent of the Comprehensive Plan of Manufacturing Park can be met on the site by requiring specific setbacks and landscaping requirements to meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. This demonstrates that the change is appropriate in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and Section 4-3014(A) ( 2) . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon the foregoing analysis, it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner approve the application request, File No . R-044-80, from G-6000 to L-1 with the following conditions to be imposed by restrictive covenants : 1 . SETBACKS --No building or structure shall be permitted as located : a . Within 20 feet of the right-of-way for FAI-405 per Section 4-716(A) . b. Within 20 feet of the western property line along Maple Avenue S .W. c . Within 5 feet of the southern property line . 2 . LANDSCAPED AREAS - The first ten feet adjacent to the western and northern property line shall be appropriately landscaped and maintained continuously in a neat and clean manner and 5 feet along the southern property line . In addition, a 6-foot site obscuring fence shall be placed on the southern property line . 3. OUTSIDE STORAGE AREAS - The outside storage of materials, construction equipment and containers shall be permitted within the buildable area of the subject property, provided such storage area is screened from all adjacent properties by a wall or view obscuring fence not less than 8 feet nor more than 10 feet in height . Such screening shall be approved by the Renton Planning Department . 4. Site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner. Ili — _ 3 X:trt f r c ,yv. 3 n Yr...I' id„,_ _QI L y Q I i PQ_ I MI no ) NI—.s'. r I a n I H OM I 7`Eau i iik II I- i ijilrn.. : ur u11 1' C I\ g. QENY0Ti—,1.1 VILL 4G! 7L N A L, id 1 ICI I M 1 .,,; qi_ 'I', -, r, ., III r. ' N. 5 ... le fikii,,, r 1`'1111"' ri 9111! WI U a h,111171 1 ! iiit a d1II111 L"R , , )\- . i II.:Illri • ,° !II I QIIII • ,,llLor+ rf' a-- ---- -------- I 4,-7..,-flN.,- n.a •.. tw:.rtY' l F R'S Tom- flr :_.. i r+ •_-t 14'F ".., • r, rx4 R. Q( • 3;C11f1, '='/'$ }/ 1 R` __r fir' A+r ' 4 _ Q rv.tr A/. ' I\ I I r' ' . o ft. 4"I * 1; l Rr a M. mi . 0 >•. .. R• r •S r,.'.. t, N t,13 wei,[,+ingi Imo. . r. i1i141111110.5_ rww«w. \ 53 ii i l - { ,--_, A-_,-..„-_-__, r _m , `'" A ,. a 1 pa .III uY - 1hl I f~,'-_'1Qiyi %• 43 ivl -I t-'.1 trt;. jx —„ — . 51 -jJ_ 9./• f1 } -f7 '- - ;.: - lif _ L' _:t'; `t• 4-_ r' } F : H L j 3 ., 'I '1 -4 ; .f. yq .'') al / 0 % I r-_ I> I-_7 - l 1 r- - r n 1 f'i l L ' I>I _ -T--—_ d_ ' -t I_ "I 1 i ZI I 2L t. _ ... 1 tea Tl' Fr _Al I- yQo,'f"'°s ,J1 T -. a/. i _ i '- - zj 17 a S © 1 'o,I, Ti y o W 4,:l 5 -' •• --- I-i Q'--- k, ' ten r4 . .1 1— 1.w-717•_•?.. t T1. F•,--r--•i>I 3 _,. (. jw{',-__ Al' y may, 1 F tc M 1 1KT_ TMte mµ}. ...u.w'4••in 4' k • , I I r ' .. 93 tit 4, i__ n 0 I s A 1. E. 14,0, ilEr6I O r 1 Etr S s Iwn • t. 4 I t r L s r L-0 Ai .ae I.j .. O i o'' 1 \ — vir Z F 4 Z: IC.;!22 W F II Ia e i 1 0\ ' . t ,i ''''. I a tr- L.„):,,,,,, 0ps la tt E{F i 1 1 bn I55'tJt THOMAS DAHLBY R-o44-80 APPLICANT THOMAS DAHLBY TOTAL AREA +6,000 sq ft PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Maple Avenue S.W. EXISTING ZONING G-6000 EXISTING USE Existing single family residence PROPOSED USE Rezone to permit use of residence for an office and construct 1 ,000 sq tt storage building COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK COMMENTS c' 1 7 .. b ry y i e H 33 g,r, ! fIF- -f,5 v-•"v fAIy i,, ti 7 ' 1.--." 2--". Iiiii :to • i 1.I.Iii •obt6 i GI bl ' iivIllter•_•. 0gli * i lop 54 1 • ` a t F' 97/7s 56. 0/:.SK<' - W. w Oil ofil ii, ,k ..., IP• 9 I%! •wP 1.0 V I 00 4'6 z i I:J 9 4,00,0„),11$f--,' tg----- 34 N A sa 9 V f r o a. sIIII P i„0 49 :0 a i 7 ''''',...-;is ,lig 3; E: N' I t N $ 1$A3 'VIII stl. f pip t` +`: q' 's . 0 • P R I AR`o' 203111 41 er.- - GT ixt III rev So i/ I 7 T S S wrrwova r rwo 3 43 'r' n 444 i k • r- w c r 14`a 1 44`r 17 K i ' 20 2101 ....„...,,,... r 1....... 1---- , PG w R 74, 9®•ai fa• 41- •17 42 I 0 v.o•r•/7as9••3r Za 47 1 i -; 18 r Va4_-i 2o • 3 r ,{ 2 4Ft7o/ 46 ` ,d• ' ,.49 ij 3 'a• t9/ 4 1, t4 45 ,f i yi•. r \`l CS1I bf 6 sl i !!ii B ao JeT.at l 1 5~{ 3 e` ':!i 4j A9 T. z s 44 as; ail .t t'c +fi ....4c s7 9+' 9 2 i r 439 : • w . ss i*=p,io off` ( A • 4. r .••26 R G HA 4 J .:... . . ` x2 J7 y v ss a h Z7 42 a A I r 11•d 3Td i Q . ,9, 2y 14,6 t03.6.7LA 15`" Oa t. 38 Z 4)F 3W 77 pg Dl. ' .„ .I, 40 .: tit:i ,G 1 i fa. d 2C 3. 141 =7 Stay-j T 30 39 J J o r °v ss SO 1 IS2r. . a s 4 r• 1E i533 • a s8 j616j(r70 b 3/1 r ' i t • _ o z' p6-i 4 4 4 $ L. g ss yaA° is 3 a. .;a. .. :;•, b o y I I " 7 ii,_411.,71.`"*" 30 ,' 28 SI • Q 3o r 2 33 ' f K ,fir L. 2,11 0 29 to*C 31 J vf 32 V a,o i 34 4 v4 3S 1 A. mJ' z.s K 6 b; .w.nos A, 'Z`,, =079 1 .. 4.• OA' - 1S 9D.es -.we • FL S. W. I5 TH.ST. . f 51 f. N89'9.S 3o CNwrs { PTA THOMAS DAHLBY REZONE REQUESTT. FOuf{TH saves - 4 j9lwa 41: o .of. ss 143•65 19s.0 1 —,_.__ p:,,sb 19o.os 190.c" G-6, 000 to L-1 , Light Industry t ' dr 1 FILE NUMBER R-044-080 0 y k 3 o: 56 ' 3 56 I. If y' V lr M 4 r r (.• •t 'k. ,,r,w4 r i' Rrr f:ts.3;;, . pk'j• . 1 yyyF 4:45 j-'d x ,, j $ Y ,, 744•• • fret•°..`5 a•--• Y Y k E,F;i, J, y• {, 1_ W M1 r ".. i ..b ill rri''d'' s,R ` "y'$'{ x r? + r s3•ti•F y"s'3 « x „ y# +AS r r"4 R. r1'• FK•h,` i'•rF' ir` t J .} --• r,° y'• t )>,s- + 1 y. e l*tr , r.,;,• r ` C.e .P-t 4+'1, Ij y „ vx J : , - 4 "' 4 }f` Carlo^ , ,, y",a F t,i , i V41.4 k " 4f. `.411 Stu 6n,,,. k ,-k h A- 4_,i" 5!" u 'FY v444,,, 7 YR'7 % S tie. ••t1'j f. /,, ` F ., . t! et y t „y+'.'• r',.,,ssq .yo„+y Y' M e YJ C.ion,,;• ?le4i'• i:4 a° { ? x =; Itiv f. Y. r L rR` i,: lV.ey'r•M•.Ra.b"'„'_ ;' .. •4.•, i' 1'+ Cg1"fS' `Y •.` t • 5Rt(r' H C I'' sr r e Ptiti.*t''k X'r.# g.. e"s , it t., r'' 1, r-`• -'• la; f...•' s i 4 1 x y,'' i. r j, s A F",' . A.•c:"' r '!,-. l".. t• b,<,a;';4 i *A: a: J o"' .xf,6'i`. ra• y&{ • M fir+I+S, A i j.;z.. -'Z l ' r'y,'St± m '"„;M•, ,,, "S 04, 'kvx'`0 S y. 4 'J.. *'} r K . s.+^' y. "' r 3 •N.s"' +M' i3'ry o t•} 5,c 4 i• 74 o, i t r.L b. 0 ni LtpaS 6• pjis r a' t'"'+, d},' . w ',E`t r •t1 r 1 ,.'f'r i + • r FY .S Y hiA1 . Y 40' t E r f 1 . i &. F, L 1 ))u..} l '\ 1,, ll4 ty r` I } F'' - if ? rr• p.it ,. , -. y R 1 M SSS . 0 JI 4 }) Yf+ 1 i.•fix.,' \ rs p yF' $( ",'A or•ere 1 in k x 5tk ,?Vali i 1 Any q + k / r, A S r +•.} y`ti 4 J k t" A,° 7 er k g +tom' Y ,#,*.I'4`,'di, ya' •{3,t, r I'....iu alr+'Y+ $ 75, 54'$'Z '- by i. x{, M t;% gl'er I{' • G'' 4 a S S Ar dr F • i fa S s'i' '. ; Y,; ', X Mf( t 17 ? r. ;F• 5+ 7 { \t c artY1 x, 5Y4 x : ag2y S t``', y'F•lp l" e, F F+'•• 4.,, ,,,,,,., 4. 1 • T r „ t .t1 tip /gy pw, 4 Sr r q4i Id4 x k iL 'l t•ry Y 114 a lY lr++ }: , St A 'h 1,.., '.rp t 1' ... , i,• .i ,a ' iFrS Ali. t 4]t ' i7, : I) '_ '''''. ' 5 i s 4Fr c a • iC• lE. j'« n THOMAS DAHLBY REZONE REQUEST G-6, 000 to L-1 , Light Industry FILE NUMBER R-044-080 r NIs' i'4',,i''':%:''r' '.•''• .::.''''-'''..1` '':;.,'I.. . • Ii•,‘.",:'', ,-. .,. ',,:'.• •". "'' .• ' Ve:q:C:"' ' ".‘ ". •''. r.'" . ` • K.' •' ' • i...i.!...".'''' ''•• '• '•r ''' . •. r ''....., 4-1-...'. .r • ' • • N,:41'if,.... rAr-4.;". •, V,.:r f.... 4.1.4,,:te-,,,,t,,..- • 4.. . .,.,,,,.,... ,,,, 7.0,4•., I - •ai.;%it;•„ctit'„..',.g,.• ..., t."•';r4.;-..:,',4.411.1/'''.":":, t .3IJiti.,4,"J4",.1`C.-',..,.."' .. . • , 1 t ,t..,.. ,4^' .' " '%'''''2 1„.t. l'''''.'r r:"-' ii,frkl,,!?.,:41..r. '''':.f..r,, i;;;,or''',,,, ,'-'f:',.•'.`I...,,,„,1„: -...!....'"'..4.e.ri''':!:‘,..-',..i...,•,, 4•. .. ,,...,'„)R.,.'-,'r 4FF"."?.;*:•-":.:0-:13?-1'.'.;.:" ,'-'1.'•'`-"i•0-""• '' ' •':i'cl, 'i i'41,-,7.44.1,' 4. 1'..:•':V,40,,,,,t4;.'' • ':.?..;,":.:Nt.',......i.:e.....!ele-2.„..!,4•':i =t4'.•i.,, , t•U ,I.gr ..1:.• a-•'- IL •,,-,, .--kr ,,,,,,,,,‘....,..„1...,...,...t me -#4,:.N.-., f 4 4 ,te . ..'0...4,, t..•..., i tt 4 t . 1,, ,,,cift, ,*- .. „. 1,11: 1....,..-•-. . y. ,--f:`•,,,k-.. .,i. '••••• , •', `,.. . 1 , , • li.5•"',?,,,.. ;,tti•Atlf":e%f,'..h.17,''' '1' ^t.".''''''.. ."",' - ." 4"....,1*-",.4",47•:341,••••'• 0-A.- .- • •• -,. •i,a,•••• 1' • ;,^-..,,,••••^ f 1 t ° ..-V,4I';',.''',--.*, 4.-' - 4, "'il' t.i....,441t ar....,,. *• e. ;,,.-.yri .v'lir-;.•...-. -...?...-, •.et.",;,, "., . 4.44. , . - t...t t 144. t,4 I '41,4 7,1...•# ,se''tV.,./e, . i„Vjp..-firl.F__Z14tiji"..,4: Ir:410,1!):f.:4.0.4PT:1 ... t. „,.. .,....:.,,, 61=A . :....: „ .ft11"..1 i •..12;...-•?.. ri.;1..--AN.4.14.of1.' •'',i.'•:",',,,•••:-:.I.v.i.nrai .-:..$1....#4400:'.,IA V:ii.gt'...tn,,i,41';;:ktt,,r-w.A z..! ---- ., ,....,...,. . i,,,-..,,. t..,,,..., ,., •kr.,,,,t-,:,..., 4.4„ ,...,„,,,,,p.,,,tag,iti,.,400 Nri 'RI.1 14i', i,(44,00''' It1.4-VIA• If Xi `t, ,-At.„,,,e,..yeai; .4.- -s,, -_.4- .,...4-t - -•••"4.0 1.4_•• • •14.4741074J•74$••±It‘ 1•41C9.31‘.4f44011g\g1,0'S-7,147iN, 4..7- `f), .41,,,,."41•-•444-1"‹,"•xtig'`44,,,,... ,-41-e'„,,-crpt"44:44,41•474:-•••••Alr,'f- u7'.14.,,60-4. --‘142;--tf,', 4*),T 7 ..• -'••• ••••.. • i....---••'4,••••,:1,44,..e.t.,,i.f.y -,•••:•4..-%„,,f.1-4, gtir.t,:s.k..4.4,„,..orieff,,,,,, ,ti.r,A, l• 1\ 4:.":41;241'''1‘44''' 414"'- d,;,"Irt"..ViittAIN 4-.7:4•1L-..r4Ar7",X6'•-t.... evi,;#4,N'''',,t'N-v.4',''. 41. . .. •,.• • 40-i.iy,-,. .,..;;]:,..,,2.01,00,,,t.:,.;y4.•:...Y,....) , ,Z-,1,„•...,•,,,,,^,,,;' ,-,-1,,,4,,,,,,,,,.......1,,•'41,•,•:•••,•''.••• •,:f.,c, ,•r,.!,...,11-32,:,, , .i.,- •,i?„0.4i-l'..4•,%st."-".117.$..,:,.•••••,'',:,-,.,,.rtrr.:::::12,..:1;:,•#;;,',',0,...1'.:,,A,"1.•„•.i),;•,•;•.,''. --4.1eit.t..1";••1,Y•-•',..•.;etfg 4.,,,''h .",•-'•?-4-,.••;Thq.4,...74•...,t-,,:,:•,..• -_,.•-‘••• 41.', '..!%•,,.'.‘,'.;.,Lf''''.'''-'''• ' ', '.'..''''' :.., 4,4..4,,./...11•4',.±.° ''...to,''I' Q•;''..!,'..,;:::`'," •:.'' , ',,,.,• '' ."' Ai,'..i..t1J.'...`.4'''''"'''''A. • t' 1" ''i 4.??1,*.t.'74,';.'''Y'''ek t',.?41'....vy z ...VV.r •r-4., i.,•:'. i 1•11,;',41::;,;,, Pd.". 4.04.0...M*114' •• ', '.,,,,,,, ':..,•.,,... ,„,„,..,.. •,,...71.. .<: l. t." AIK, I •i• . • 7... A44::f•t4- . "••••....:-....:L..,- . s''"'"*7•"4'• „. ..„. r,,,.,..,4,-,,,,, Air p- 4,,,A,N; g, ,• -fr.,' ..•,,fet-., • ...,,,i,-•'t,.7,... v. .44' 1.i.u.wi,1,..A.21A 1 • ,WW.,, t, '.. 0...4"''y• NV-'''4, II .- --.. , ,,„ t 9,;:ga,':,P'.'..,•4.41,KI'''Zs' ..t,' ''''` t.-'4` ' f4.-,04Vir'eil.r•.ko,,,, .,-,..,..,,,,.i..i.v4,,,,,.-1.,,Itz,..,,t.f,.:;/-4,4.,...,t34‘,;:., ., -- . --, ., .., , ...-.:,•=7,,7• ,,...ii-,v1„,....:.1.1,..„ -,.,,,,1.1.-., , •..,,,, ......1 k,,is; ?;,.!-44- 7:•••; 7:7.-•"•94.='*0•fs, 1%,?$;. q•‘' lit.4 '073,,, . '. —,•:.:-.r.r.. .,..,,' -5:, ctrrr., t1.4 II,"*"4 'IC4t0,..f.4.:4.,:.,.3••••,,...•4.;-•,Z7',...;Frifj•-e, -1,;( 44"..."' ,..%(411.4f,h;izi.•, ,%,••-•,,,'•,•• 4','':''' r'. t...frO'01.;10,: t.a.;,T• t"4 171 441,''4'*.,•`4,' .41W,-:,4!,'I,ilf,•;.)-',V.0.7:".4.4.0.:tirt,r,4.... ..,...i--..,,, ft„.1.1.c.• , :i'• t.‘,-..,..,:, --7, .4..i.4,,, 11..0,4.4%. ;;;;ec?Ortott!.1,•,7:• :t.-.,'' Z.,4•".'1-0'..kt '''',4,,A t",1,:1';',.:;;...:0141;,-4.f.,.l'i,'"(1.4.t• ''''„,.',.,i,)..t.lib), 4.4t1,,P."..‘40,6,, f', ' ' • ';,,,, W:...f."• ,..,;.7'hr. 4.0.1",1,,,.'",,,...,....,..;,,L_,_4•14..!:„.„• .,." 4''-"41.,.--4''''t',, V•,'",-,'...'dt..''44•111A4?i'lti."•rii.4;',.•, ';.".%.,,':•,i,r, , ',414:11--...:.2,9 -•,•!,'-,,4•='0141•14.i, 1I,• e.liti,-•:.',*7i,-7-4-4•,,,,,,.-.•••;:014,-*17.A•••,,ft, 4k''''''''il-Zir.:.-041.'Site.. i'')4' f„.•••ift•-•41T-141 14 '- ' ' ' 1". "'"'' .411103.. 7.••:::•""•!....- -" Tit"..4,.t.....f,..1•••:%`'''' t'''• i .17. ..'I•14t.Y'-'-'1.44.4.0x'''..yht 0.e,::::..,k-7,1 I.'...t.*.,,..''t''`'.' i 1 1,.., ,......... . i.,,,... ,,,,•vo.,,..,- 4.5.,..:' ,..: i. •,•,:.••..::" 4)4f.:.,...,...;,•"'io• 'A:et.4" .; 61:'''"'::s" 4;11,:k.4;17.117A: Y.:4;i."'letliji‘:.C•a;•:".77`;" '': '..::.'.:• . .•-•••• ''--• ' .,•-••••••3.1- ''7.•*-:,'•• t'..:‘, •Vf.,•;,,"*I-tc, ••'''•-T- ' :. -• '•• .'-' .-•''- 4."•"'4,‘"'Y.:•4.: .' ... 7-zosp•••-trrr••'.:''-•".;.. -, •-• ... - , ..,2 ,....•• •-^',•14Fae'un`.4.'... c• r , k1.f,-..;.--..4..‘,•;. 0.., '',',.... -.: - '''''';::. ''''' .' AA,,,,e0k..-' •'. • •,...4''''''.'", .. r 7:' •-'•". ' ' . '•'.--.:: •-••••••" ' •''•:... -':. '`:f"'',;'',,.:-,.,27,.?4:7i;1 fr-:',:..I.V..4f,•,.'..,d•••'.:' 2 e•-,zi.,4:.•"--•,1,.:r.•.:...:.,1 r• •• ... . • • ot,4,•.,.1..: ;,.,A.,...;:pipel,c:...-.,,,,;:t.4.vrtik.,Ltg..../,‘,..:,,,,....t.------.....' .• -.:, •.!.• •'•.•.:....,....,:.. ..s...k, 4;7...-414-..--,:,,•-•.... •. .....,. •..4,,,-....:-,;••••.--..-4,,,,k•Ai::•,..-, •.',,. ....„,•,,-;,,- -..•..•,-,:,i..:,•.•,•,•,-..,.•,,,,...:„....,•,...• .. - - . - . . . ....,,,,,,,,,-.!7:.,--• • ......••.,,..f.-,...e.-..,1t'iii,,,,,.,:;,-••,.-..•.';'..- •• - ,..•‘,. • - ,.. ,,.. a,-, .• ...--,••• • ..,./. . ::,••••,•••.•;..!..•....t; :,.,!,;,:,•,.,.........,..... • • ,...,.• • ,.....!,. ,..„..••.;,• 1 ,li•J'F:'....:.k'.1'.P '..,i••"!•,,•: -'.:,,-•,.,:.•,-,7...-',.1'....,':•;:',• ..•i.,,-";•,•:-,. .. ,.., .•••...;•-... ,.•,, , i I . ..•il'"c'oc''I,"•••,' .,• ,•••••••••,:'•••;•;•:.•"• 4, -.!•-•,.... 7.'1, 7i•••••••,--•- •,:,,',',-,,,.•'•'-': '••',••,•:,7.' •.„,',':.• •"..", t,;•••7,.".„.',....• ;•••••'.':, ',.,,••••;•••'..., •.,',,,,•i!,•3`,. : ,..•' .. 1,'-,'..":‘•' ..'. ':'I .,•• • ' .7, . . • 7.''1.,,...'!•••Y't :.,'.•,' 0'.1•:!.•,:t.I:•,...' .:,;"...7:.•;C''.'•-••' •'•!••••' ••`'••..•"•'•' ••'7•Y:-.,c's•l•7:', '",•.• l' - i.A.,2;•-",41,74,1/4f-44-44.4:-,m."4.i.,,,,t7p•,,„•,,,41;t4•01-...41V‘t..c.`".•';':40•1:.:j.‘"”•;:•')fri444,i,',-,111,4,- • 7;4•,,SW,:.,<5.1tMk•V,Ve;;;;"_,O.,-rff•r7.1"P.,•,,,,f 3.1,,"k:•ift.kr•••14i-Mtt4.-i.,P440ke41,-;•`•''‘ 4,4• 141t41:0111•4:14•'•-•••••'•7(';''',,-4::::Ji„1"rit•„1,.V4-'•''''''•4.6i;t1474V•540,•7," V.•1:'''O'il,. 7--•„, • : •4ii.,114,4V•s•-..-d' ,t',.4- a .t....:.-k., ,.. .•,- • •,.,.-/•to,0Y 40,,IN, I 1 p• • •• 2. . -71:11:14.$4,qtktyk!'''.' ;•:, •,..,'.:'• -07'rc 4., •. :: • '. . .'p..;'..:*v tk,*•Wpti'hc„,t.r..,&,,)„.tlive.'4' :11.,•,,e..' •, • . • vok• • 4. : .,i•'•,,.,-I tt. : ,.4. ,,,,c.4. A- LL' 0•0'. 0-,.• 4i-A-•,-c';• ,.s..A. ','•i.. -:41.14...T i.0:1'1 i'.'".•'' .10,094/11.0 qi: '',-,5i....•v.,4k.... ' `;':4*•••".ti 4 Lit,z„ilk; 3., -;• ,.•::'+A•'';1.nrlirif,glg,iM,;,410 Vi:iifi.s.'••1 V.:'';''''''''''1`"' 144.4.1t' '''' '.14?1 ?"'•I'P''',I.':'.'.4.. ' . ik`... f...ikt%:...'".'' t''''''0,,'.,..A:?,..4,0,....4 :44,. ,. 4 4 ••-, p,',4-44••'-.tr; •1;:"11'.4 1 t4, , ,,t t. At''4,Vet.N": 414:',11,,'..'.k.„ • , ' ' ' I.s''..:;.%''',!, A . 1. -.. .,',"4. A t.,t,,„,,,,, ) •;',AO ' P.-. 54, , .. ' 44‘'„" 'bk4,..,gr.,„Itw".$1,4;,..4:•r,.,.,... c„.2' r'-;,, ,.',1", . '9,1t1b4r,,,V•t •1,••••2,•`0,,t , . .: , 1.V.I.'.,.i'Ll ;. ''''';';'''''' ''''4* - 1,..t,-.1.-. ../t•...•,,,..,. 4,-. ''' .1, '.1 ', '""•06 .pl.'t' A ,,,,41%, .`'• , ,, ,,.. e.'';" 4,4°4';'''''',5"' 014'1' ''''I''k''`'..4'''i'-' :NY 41''Y '\.14 ' •,4•,‘,,,':1.14•• ••• • s ...tr. _ •- ' lir .t.,,.. . ,',.... - . -. 4,4,,o'f_ t-e' ) •?..44.._... ....‘,....,!..', ';,...•‘-.':i• !,4,,. ,i... .4.,4,..4.1.‘ ,44,0.';,:--ti' , .-- --,...„, !. . .. . ' ',.144 7...:•„;,.!,,'.;*IN r' ..-,:-'... ., . i4 p4,',' 1:.,':-.• . '"?' ...v 43:‘:,....,'Y.;•ii.•,-..;..., . ,,,,i ,„j.,'''t 1•Is :,':ii.?.•Tr.r''' : '',1' •';' ,.11.".'"A %' .''...'''' '4: I'''.e4 14''• _ 7r-e.,.‘ . ..,,,..t...,.,;.4_, f, - 1-': it:n:ii;.,..,:,,,...., '.. - '),,k u44 .r1. IP''.';',''''t ',if.'4• .' 7 • • "."r°N1+174.4t;'(4(ii .", r't;:4" • ..', An'.°44."t., •,;,:-',N f',• 1 - —1,4,c'• 4:, ..4). "1-:.1.5 -4 ,,•`•,••'. . 4:,,,,,112,0,s.fo,..,sai: '. .1 ; Illf, i--`,:170411' . 7. 4tr,',.?.,,„,ki;%.•••''•••',. ..,• ••' 4,) • -!it,i.,, - ••.--e, -.cr.; ,•f ,,,.•-•:,_ - t,:t,,,11,4"-V."''' 4' : -.',.---. 4)-. '''' 1.':-. "' ' .!,'79.1,.. .i.,. , ''• - ' ., 4 !".7.,,,. ".•• t,,, 44,* . '. , ,, • ' ,.,i" 1 i,, : ,,, ,,,,,, , :• ,,,,.•.. S .."••?,,.-• . 11?..'.'..4....,,,,4.10.,,, re • . • „. ... „,__, r,.',,A,t'•'.1;,.,;,-.„,?• ..,y,t:s,•40:A.k:tit,,,..':•;.0','Pl,i,;.''ti't'4-,'t,;:,'.r '.i.•'P'•'', ',.."'t, ''',''•'',',.1...,. ',..;.r.- ., •• .' -••••kji?,.g:i1•11.1.5,';:;'f.:,,'•;!,,9;i.:''..,•.:'•,/';'*%'...i,f(:-.;-,:Yil''-i,..:4,-,;•,:,:;;;I';'.:,•,..:-.',t,;„',::.....”:41,-.:7 7 71:•.--;:.;.14:';..,.-:,:2;:':.:"7::1".:.::--i.- -- 1. ..tt,,,':••,.,..,'"',.,. .vi,c4:1.4-;',11.1,-I'''4:,LZ•;;;,.....:;:.:*....*•,'!.,PNV.::.;••:•:7•''"":',.•-,p'.,,?••••,;• :,;:,•,..:?'•:.•••-. 7^, - '. '',•, i.tkiltn:',4 q•„••1„,1.•••.?F'.0...,.,".Iter.r.r'....•., .,,:.'...4: F,"1,.., • , ,-•••!--e.!...,....,.,+,4 1",•i',..C441.'12'.4.,".:,+.';:ie4t:".7•:.,'.4'''''''.?,!',:ii'': "'• ' '''.• .•' ;.. "• '...'''.04'4°414,'',.'.••••.''• ,'";•!•!:?-';•!..,n .,•i,..,:),:•$.1i.w,,•..i.% ., , •..:,,„.;••.;•,', ..,....... , : • ' T H 0 M A S DAHLBY REZONE REQUEST 1,,,,,,.:,:,:,...,;•.,..::;;,.,;,.771.!:;:.•••::.;•••:,...,s.,, ... i:•':kri4,74'.3.-,,,,„.:,.:. • .:,.:#::,,-,..,:,•,..z.,0,,il . R-044-80.i4'‘..•'...1'?, !.,'44:::;';';,':','......t..•1,4?..;":','".'.,.;' '•:.':', . '... - ' ::''....• '''..s. 1..' •''';'' ...:.': 4.1''';':: '''' ; '.'''''''H.'.:.: '''.... '' ''''':'' .'''1 ' ' • ' GF-I6LE°t°1°UMBtEoR L-1 , Light Industry l.i.,!.,.,•••;,....,..:,.;,f6.,,:,....i,"..•• ',.•,.;..' I. ,,:-.;!':'.: . 1. s,'''.".:.''' '.':,'',',, 2. T, L,,,,•,',, , , r .t.q!',...: .. j .!, • ' :,• •c4, • •; , ' ," •• ' . .-r,‘, , i, ' •,'..!/';',.:•,•;•:'',,) i''Y',',j L, •'--.,, "' 7"••.,-.1 ',.•ei•41. •,,,:.--,.....1s,,s"fv--,e" ,, n io•o tI t EAIaT17+r1 R¢st oat-1c"6 n- Z, Tu r.6 u'78D roi4: Z t J 2.-orlc-,- 1'W Sf Eh NEW hTarz t.E oull.Olr16.1 4=2 2A-7- 100M - j'Pr t tb2 0u, IooO SF S 3fl r r 0,2 670(4416-114 7r'A L cc, 44.0 4 4 0 0 F h0.0 c . • 4,0.0• J m 8 r Z O v_ d eve l o p me n t p I a n F jH6 ',116 " ft..A. V THOMAS DAHLBY REZONE REQUEST REr4Y04-1 G— 6 ,000 to L-1 0 6:::::7)"41 FILE NUMBER R-044-80 et u e 4, sw lull s1 / SITE IF 0 V LDNl1b 4 7• 1 VICINITY PLAN + DEVELOPMENT PLAN a a a Apr 7 1980' O o w 1 REZONE APPLICATION DOCUMENTS FOR E•• , • t i—2 MI T 0 M D A II L B Y v i c i n i t y m a p 41 a . I . o o d f e l i o w architect 1 2 1 - 6 7 7 6 I •11•• 1 J N qa.o. SETBACK FROM PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY --- SECTION 4-716(A) a)DAinTN-111 CZ— - NLI;a_ Z J FRONT YARD Tema °s6o rcn 2-a(fv,602.. MP Sr pi. 5To¢n[.E 6ua1.0i-4 tr.i 4.2 C SETBACK Isa-rmaa n - 0/0 hr; Ps 2 avo sr s 380oY2hTORPyE-1 IS 5/ L 0 o as p fa 20' ' O 1- r1 I., ,o' z z o s 5 ' SIDE YARD SETBACK 5 6 ' SOLID SCREENING FENCE devel opment plan i' SN6 SIj6 th r1.4.1 P.E14IL, THOMAS DAHLBY REZONE REQUEST a G-6 ,000 to L-1 rk 7u,ac'K FILE NUMBER R-044-80 3 re. i y""'^'yr 11 SITE... STAFF COMMENTS 4 i0PLAHy -, IVICINITY•PLAN + DEVELOPMENT PLAN p yy M REZONE APPLICATION DOCUMENTS FOR A. 2 ;. B0 yi bt. Iasi T 0 M D A II L B Y vicinity map I i' a . I . g o o d f o l l o w , architect z..1 1`` '\--- N.C ,f4 - erg. s L °:•\y -''1:\\`\`•P.1y'l',_v•` -•' \V `1`'11.ivs lJ 6" RIVE i A I 47 '''' I AP,/ 4 I ,-. -, r,,,,,,.. . i 5 T_ , . ,/ ,,oft.. L zao-...i.,- i 7-• t,--„....._._,____.,. ..,,..• N , q....,..„.. r 1 - - 1. ------- 1---j------1- t- . cr, I deb,.... C—_-- dncisoN_ i nJe-s w -=Lis I a5 I I \\\_..,•., r- i LONGACRES RACE TRACK 11 \ 1 y, I\ 1 rn D i t" ' r -- gip ------- nCP -- ° - - 1• k N I L _ 3,_ t \ r ,,,\ .: ...: ‘., 041 I .. -,. -. N 1 21 ...' r' , tAlc" 1 1- -------- — 1'_ i r!,;) 111, v11NE0 .-IF A.0...i Tr NO nb 1f rt, TI Itiir.', 1it ‘ ' I pifij11 j f;I: 1 1 i-' bh za, Y G Z hf. mom 1; I T NOM45 AVE , y,++ 5.4 f'ti,L 1 J Ii•ar7 L rlirf' r ..s, ':3 7'i? R (Z THOMAS-- SW _ L A,,,,, -[ RA•_Y•M••is ,1' t 5 1 ', rl '1 ram_- ' Ill 4 ,, M GC) 1 11. 1 ... , I- I 1i' 1, V/ lj ri• •'A t tI N i i I ,.I 1 I,I•i•rl/',I ssnro& o4,1'PI f•? 0 L.I' I' [0a t' , 3 I I i CbE NE TA Avi 9w ; IF VACA E[Y 1?, Y, y, I •II •r ->;. y I t• 0.1"' Orr ' ' 1 1 Igara:i \ I,.: i! i• v-v'2ad><ec!` I1I l _ ''i".:_ Jr. II _. '•t 1 ' 7..! Irl r I 1.1'• i , ,.1..1'J JJ' i fir^ II II k..- '--- ,. 1 I,`'• '•• ; Z J' ALATE _ AVEJ_ i.,, „-emu__ -k . `- A i...r ._ ..f•....l I ry i - i 1 S ff A t ' ". 1 L i I V D AVE -.w 1 _-- ; I'S E:_ I ii,L Li 1 1 I;1I yr i 1 I, I £4 111 .{ -f -+ 1 r` I. i r I „. , 1I, .II,i It.11,'' ' ! „:1A! ' I Sr."• 1 k.,.m, 0 1. • w. S ', ,, y1 i' ` t 1 I 1 i 1 0 I - It 11, I ''r1fIliLi111111111,11}.- C1 I. „,, , I I I I Q ' {1 t 1 1 1 VACATC D:.__ Y' * f. ` 1 I if1 i . I,I .1,T1 p F I I !avE S 1,1 1 l}•V 1 I{ 11, I.....tic, 1 i t.), " i 1114. .'tf ti' I .,\ Wi t15a,.. 111I!l1I 111 I11111',l'„J •_1 1 _„'' 0 ,.;, •C -.' ' I t I,vACA7_ED_I" f Ir Ian,. 7 T.T I I , 1 1 ..fllr•a'_' J- 1I — Hi. 1 i' I ., , i„ 11-n1 r I • -.,. 11f l 1I,t 4 i- le- i RJ,. L. in t I • _ jam- t- __ __- ---- T. NPNLIE \_.,E WI} 1 , - - -' 1.. . k, _____)\r, . if ..1 „ H.. , ,_ ..,..„.. ILL 111 1 i _ , iM I _ M lie I Y .T-k'- 1 }•-1LLI/ _- U_• 111 iI r° 4 III Y t- I{ .' o 1. -I ,l!. 1 II 9 _ -- y h I A IY 7 y 1 DA,15.-- -_./ /' MI nR h " "L ,1 I , i / // lIY' _ram Hs 1.1 I_-jvcy--.Al/ 9 •--; • i // • 11,'\ 1 •r x' :11JATTK ... P...,,,,,, G, 4., I x •.,,t' IL.I 1 i LNG i- `" PTT. `:* \\. t\\ \ III- dillyI ; I %' U ,_X -I kl i°kFk b=' I r- N r:""'" i 9 i' i I , e E S L ,_- - _I- --- + • 111, m I,Lau1}f•• 1 ' CTCA. I - I VY61fthjZ 1 ,• I .<1J ,.i I • a --/, RD -- \ NE;T E S1.I 00 y 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET cation A . 6 60 ekt5'krtf/eglefffe 7 e's 4c o dt°i r e ricoir,•7iv /Lei 60 CSacir ei/ ; Location : Øci,ii 7?y o m cvnit e Ave. $iW Applicant: tJea.`'1 IL 7;Nry l ) TO: WAS Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : / f/'‘, 00 Police Department A. R. C. MEETING DATE : S/_2g/'d Public Works Department 5/'i • l 1 g7i2242. Engineering Division Traffic . Engineering Building... Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON 9!SC. AT 9; O A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TQ A TEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:0U P.M. ON S12.-7/90 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with. Conditions Not Approved 77 47 1/ 1" 7 g--) • Sigp'ature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : c ; Approved .7/ Approved with Conditions Not Approved 1.)/_ k?cQ "-"-li7 i/1 - 4/ S 6 -- D veG.o//14vi (S/I/3-/ erL'c//Gt cc?.a;S 72v10 J cAo Signature of Director or Authors ed Representative Date P1,anni ng 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : ers>ohe CA - e 9V" O)4, fe,'S.0 s ski' e't& , ? v 4 5 .041 o :e or s iv"a /G'1®•..p-baea.: Location : g'Cirli l Ql/VC //44 AVE,. c?, ./ Applicant: ad& 7;Yi i TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 4",' /8o Police Department A. R.C. MEETING DATE: 674$/S4 Jl`lPublicWorksDepartmenti4 ' e t Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building` Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN EVEWWRITINGFORTHEAPPLICATIONR CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON 5- 5/RO AT 9:UU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUDEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE Tp AIjTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Re resentativ Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :Ar44c g)5iev e ? , , . ON 6 Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved P e Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s) f R-044-80 Environmental Checklist No: ECF-565-80 Description of Proposal: Revise existing residence to use as an office and construct s '1000 square foot storage building Proponent : THOMAS DAHLBY Location of Proposal : Vicinity of 1402 Meadow Avenue S.W. Lead Agency: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on May 14, 1980 followingapresentationbySteveMunsonofthePlanningDepartment. Oral comments were accepted from Gordon Y. Ericksen: Setbacks and screening to be addressed at time of Hearing Examiner report. Don Persson: Access to be addressed at time of Hearing Examinerreport . Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-565-80 are the following: 1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson, Assistant Planner, May 5, 1980 2) Applications: R-044-80 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Gordon Y. Ericksen, recommended declaration of non- significance, no impact on the surrounding properties.Warren G. Gonnason concurred, John Webley, concurred. Comments recommending declaration of non-significance received from Traffic .Engineering, Building, Engineering. Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment . An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c) . This decision was made after review bytheleadagencyofacompleteenvironmentalchecklistand other information on file with the lead agency. Signatures: rWG O 11.171111 r i/1 rte hn E . Webley, Parks D rector Gordo . Sri -en, ' lanning t erector Warren G. onnason, Director Public Works Department DATE OF PUBLICATION : May 21, 1980 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD June 4, 1980 Zy", r1.i M F, S ;c M 4.. e."' ,pew`h ' t A M„ GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: VICINITY OF 1402 MAPLE AVENUE S.W. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT. I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF b. 19a r. it o,; TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON JUNE 10, 1980 BEGINNING AT 9: 00 AvM. P. A. CONCERNING ITEM [ 7. REZONE - G-6000 TO L-1 SPECIE.. PERMIT II SITE APPROVAL U WAIVE- SHORELINE MAAG ' E5T P :* RMIT DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ISSUED MAY 14, 1980 DIRECT APPEAL TO HEARING EXAMINER. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON , WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON JUNE 10, 1980 , AT 9 :00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION : THOMAS DAHLBY, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G-6000 TO L-1 , File R-044-80 ; property located in the vicinity of 1402 Maple Ave . S.W. Legal description of file noted above is on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 10, 1980, AT 9 :00 A.M. TO. EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . PUBLISHED: May 28, 1980 GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 23rd day of May, 1980 . SIGNED: FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s) : R-044-8O Environmental Checklist No : ECF-565-80 Description of Proposal : Revise existing residence to use as an office and construct a 1000 square foot storage building Proponent : THOMAS DAHLBY Location of Proposal : Vicinity of 1402 Meadow Avenue S.W. Lead Agency : CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on May 14, 1980 following a presentation by Steve Munson of the Planning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Gordon Y. Ericksen : Setbacks and screening to be addressed at time of Hearing Examiner report . Don Persson : Access to be addressed at time of Hearing Examiner report . Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-565-80 are the following: 1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by : Steve Munson , Assistant Planner, May 5, 1980 2) Applications : R-044-80 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance : Gordon Y. Ericksen, recommended declaration of non- significance , no impact on the surrounding properties. Warren G . Gonnason concurred , John Webley, concurred. Comments recommending declaration of non-significance received from Traffic Engineering, Building, Engineering. Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment . An EIS is not required under RCW 43 .21C .O3O ( 2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Signatures : hn E . Webley , Parks D rector ; G o. d n Y 'rAkben, lanning irector Warren G. onnason, Director Public Works Department DATE OF PUBLICATION : May 21, 1980 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD : June 4 . 1980 FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s) : R-044-80 Environmental Checklist No : ECF-565-80 Description of Proposal : Revise existing residence to use as an office and construct a 1000 square foot storage building Proponent : THOMAS DAHLBY Location of Proposal : Vicinity of 1402 Meadow Avenue S.W. Lead Agency : CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on May 14, 1980 following a presentation by Steve Munson of the Planning Department . Oral comments were accepted from: Gordon Y. Ericksen : Setbacks and screening to be addressed at time of Hearing Examiner report . Don Persson : Access to be addressed at time of Hearing Examiner report . Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-565-80 are the following: 1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson, Assistant Planner, May 5 , 1980 2) Applications: R-044-80 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Gordon Y. Ericksen, recommended declaration of non- significance , no impact on the surrounding properties . Warren G. Gonnason concurred , John Webley, concurred. Comments recommending declaration of non-significance received from Traffic Engineering, Building, Engineering . Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment . An EIS is not required under RCW 43 .21C .030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Signatures : inn E . Webley , Parks D rector Gordon Y. ri k en, lanning rector /' M/2.? Warren G. onnason, Director Public Works Department DATE OF PUBLICATION : May 21, 1980 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD : June 4 . 1980 Date circulated : ,. h//8® Comments due : -6 //3 (5Q ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF _,_.5'_ e® APPLICATION No (s) . if? 1 20/yg--(Q-OVV_ O) G--odo to &-/ PROPONENT : D(Lk' by rA®rre4 S PROJECT TITLE : Brief Description of Project : We Vise eX w, t'o 1"?' reS/VcDp,c 7 4 to 4,5ddi if:44(1/ cc -sic'®srs/rtic f-ec (®® ® '.5X."'aye' fold i c4r 7.. LOCATION : Watti_rr4Ite /VDT Modc {/e.,574/ SITE AREA : t 6O®4 BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : e.,,i'..* r 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : fj 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 1 46/'''' -'7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : _T—`jO$ e.-------- east : south : ..5','^ifer:;%... styok..at10-7 west : o Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 0 1 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : . 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :ct ...----- traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 1." - 16 ) Utilities :L/ 17 ) Human health : G 18 ) Aesthetics : 1/ 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : S t I ,'t,,.4en d° ifd A D1,'AS sC yr ,-". c u v., ® Si p, P e eer 74. Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Informatio Reviewed by : Date :_________________________ FORM: ERC-06 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - Sb.f'- gi•D APPLICATION No(s) . R°ZD/f' 'A y9-8 6-400401t2 ~l PROPONENT : Al/I by 1166/4¢ PROJECT TITLE: JJ Brief Description of Project : gsrl a ext 5'1'i iee5/dcs a., jj') US le Q 5 .ezor Oieli e Q 4.9toNstivcf.es /DOd .5146 raosre Lea". LOCATION: U/a/ti ie d/ Del if /e tmt SITE AREA:11:1&1100 BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (o) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO _ 1 ) Topographic changes: 2) Direct/Indirect air quality: 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5) Animal life: I 6) Noise: 7 ) Light & glare: 8) Land Use ; north: east : south: west : Land use conflicts : 9) Natural resources: J 10) Risk of upset : - 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings: 13) Trip ends (ITE) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services: 1 15 ) Energy : 16) Utilities: 17) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : l 19) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : 1 ,/ COMMENTS : Recommendation: . l)NS /DOS More Information____. Reviewed by : . l/ l 2-- f-- ) Title: -n//ef ,' '3vy L .f Date : ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEWI SHEET ECF - giaD APPLICATION Na(s) . RE.04/E /C-14/8 6-60106 6.- PROPONENT : Dalt/t) 140,4. PROJECT TITLE: Brief Description of Project : ,' y,Se exist et e5%. S et 04 e 45 4/164•c @ sieostSte0C .at /DOQ c7 .atee le'/& y.LOCATION : r;e/4o1 45`fict9e2 Mild & AfigNe.41 SITE AREA: KQ15 BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic changes: 2) Direct/Indirect air quality: 1 _ 3) Water & water courses : 1( 4) Plant life: 5) Animal life : 6) Noise: 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east : south : west : Land use conflicts : 9) Natural resources : 10) Risk of upset : S( 11) Population/Employment : X 12 ) Number of Dwellings : X 13) Trip ends (ITE) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services: IC 15) Energy : tr 16) Utilities: 17) Human health: 18) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS': Recommendation : DNSI Nr DOS More Information Reviewed by: : LA:IA.11614:r Title : 04n( Oftteirravvf 47V4 . Date : 6°' C kA2s6 'qifrY/ge) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - lie$- act. APPLICATION N o (s) . REZO/V&-- -o yy-4RD) 6-6D040 v-, &/ PROPONENT : Dal M lj lnomi cY PROJECT TITLE : Brief Description of Project : / y'ekes r releg d' a e. 7SO4 e 4S Qlel .2 4Con$SrociLa MOO 'S7A ran"eLis/t LOCATION: U/ii1i 6-f/'0 Made Itivez..sei SITE AREA:1 CA/1 0 BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (®) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes: 2) Direct/Indirect air quality: 3) Water & water courses : v 4) Plant life : 5) Animal life : 6) Noise: 7 ) Light & glare: 8) Land Use ; north: east : south: west : Land use conflicts : 9 ) Natural resources : 10) Risk of upset : 11) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings: 13) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : 15) Energy : 16) Utilities : 17) Human health: I 1,/ 18) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation: I 20) Archeology/history: I COMMENTS:. Recommendation : DNSI 2( DOS More Information Reviewed by:(:;6" Title: Date : S/z/f-e EI VIIRONHENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEU SHEET ECF - £S-- gi'D APPLICATION No (s) . /yç&g ) 6^ podzo L-/ r PROPONENT : Da ki 6 t-aome PROJECT TITLE : QQ Brief Description of Project : 1T 'v'i ! eJ(;A /n ie 4 e .4E S Q-sc e164 s ce 4CCorrSling c ell /OD®0SA e L.14 LOCATION : Xe,,,,.6 ete/'40a 4 , y ' fi SITE AREA: 1-4G1/41 BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic changes: 2) Direct/Indirect air quality: 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5) Animal life: 1 )(6) Noise: 7) Light & glare : X 8) Land Use ; north: east : south: west : Land use conflicts : 9) Natural resources: X 10) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : V 12 ) Number of Dwellings: 13) Trip ends (ITE) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : 15) Energy : i 16) Utilities: I X 17) Human health: 1B) Aesthetics :7( 19) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS: Recommendatio DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by: `/,,-r-Y1 /( 4e+i,-,- Title : Date : 6 re) PLANNING.DEPARTMENT li PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAlA:INE1e PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 24 , 1981 APPLICANT: THOMAS R. DAHLBY FILE NUMBER: V-003-81 A. SAY PURPOSE OF i ccr T The applicant seeks a variance composed of two parts : 1 ) A request to reduce the required building setback . of 20 feet from the northerly property line (Sec. 4-726A) to 10 feet; (2) A request to reduce the parking aisle width from 24 feet (Sec. 4-2206-1C2a) to 22 feet and the stall length from 20 feet (See 4-2206-1A) to 18 . feet. B. GENERAL Iff FO ;','\TIO1: 1 . Owner of Record: THOMAS R. DAHLBY 2. Applicant: THOMAS R. DAHLBY 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) 1402 Maple Avenue S.W. 4 . Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property: 6 ,000square feet 6. Access :Via Maple Avenue S.W. 7. Existing Zoning: L-1 , Light Industrial 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : G-6000; L-1 , Light Industrial 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on February 8, 1981 , and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on February 6, 1981 . C. m ISTORY/B GR D D : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1745 of April 14 , 1959 , at which time it was zoned "G" . The property was subsequently rezoned to L-1 by Ordinance 3469 of September 24 , 1980. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO .E HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: THOMAS R. DAHLBY, V-003-81 FEBRUARY 24 , 1981 PAGE TWO D. PHYSICAL is ACIEG P RIND: 1 . Topography: The subject site is relatively level. 2. Soils : Urban Land (Ur) . This soil has been modified by disturbing the natural layers with the addition of fill to accommodate industry. 3. Vegetation: The subject site consists primarily of tall grass, blackberries, and brambles with a few medium growth shrubs along the westerly frontage. 4 . Wildlife: . The existing vegetation on "the site may provide some habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: No surface water was evidenced on the subject site (May 30, 1980) . 6. Land Use: The subject site consists of an existing single family residence. To the south and to the west are single family residences , also I-405 is adjacent to the north and east. E. R EI, i;:l ®':4cOD CHARACTERISTICS: The general area is in a transitional nature from undeveloped and single family residence property to commercial and industrial uses. A small unuseable lot lies between the subject property and I-405 to the north. F, SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: A 12" water main extends north-south on Maple Avenue S.W. adjacent to the subject site and a 24" sanitary sewer runs east-west on S.W. 16th Street within one-half mile to the west. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the Renton Fire Department per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Metro transit route #161 operates along S.W.. Grady Way within 1 mile to. the northwest of the subject site. 4. Schools : Although the site is within the Renton School District , no existing schools are located in the general area. 5. Recreation: No existing parks are located near the subject site. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS 07 THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-712; L-1 , Light Industrial District 2. Section 4-716 (a) ; Setbacks from primary state highways H. 1,!IPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CONIP:'.1041mANSIVE Pam( OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITE 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, June 1976, Objectives , Pages 5-7. 2. Section 4-2206-1A, Chapter 22, Parking and Loading Ordinance. 3. Section 4-2206=1C2A, Chapter 22, Parking and Loading Ordinance. 1, PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: THOMAS R. DAHLBY, V-003-81 FEBRUARY 24 , 1981 PAGE THREE I. SAC' ON THE N m URAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems : Minor. 2. Population/Employment : Not Applicable. 3. Schools : Not Applicable. 4. Social: Minor. 5. Traffic : Minor J. D It',:400 w NTAJL+ ASSESai T/THRESHOLD II ETE Nm I] ATI O Pursuant to the City of Renton°s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, the subject proposal is exempt from the threshold determination of environmental significance. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS C oST'AACTDD: 1 . City of Renton Building Division. 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Department. L. PLANNING D '\ TMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The variance request for building setback is sought for a +1 , 500 square foot storage building to be located 'at the easterly extremity of the subject site. The existing configuration and unusual shape of the property are a result of past acquisition of property to construct FAI-405. The applicant attempted previously to purchase from the State of Washington existing narrow portion of property adjacent to the northerly boundary of the subject site. This proved to be unsuccessful when the State indicated that it needed to retain the parcel for future interchange area ' expansion. These actions severely restrict any building construction when the required setback of 20 feet is applied. The applicant has addressed these facts in the variance justification (attached) . These. points would appear to support the criteria for a variance outlined in Section 4-731-2B. 2. As indicated, the second portion of the variance request is to reduce the parking aisle width from 24 feet (Section 4-2206-1C2a) to 22 feet and the stall length from 20 feet (Section 4-2206-1A) to 18 feet. , Restrictive covenants of the rezone (landscape requirements) along the northerly and westerly property lines reduce the area available to meet these standards. This fact together with the irregular shape of , the site location of the existing building suggest that there is reasonable justification for the variance request. M. D' eARTMENTAL ANALYSIS: Based on the above analysis , the Planning Department recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve the variance requests. r SrI. S V 1 9 C, i' 1 I ,, 8a t. .L. t W gyp °- G' x " , I • I I e. Yam• L 1 I I11 439.1. 51.,Al.1 t-- ,•. .;•••••;•"- It,-,•••Cr r: , 4. .,:.0.• •• :, •,,,. ..„. •• ••'. ; . ••••••., i ', I1 oei: •,,, iii j1 t'' . 1 'fhf'!.., ra,, sic n?,:iiI.'; i l ei•• • er i 4,- ' CO i I'111 f r nilq I u A f n: 1 -.ih l' xl 9 ty• y4, a i ..r,rs, .I #` i 'fie .,.. ^^". c 1 ` • 1 r A .A. ° • I I..." Le • ata tt i NO; /T n n , , .'..••„"' •Y" I o e.4 r-7..-r r " f•, r 1,,.. .,., .1 ;771 t r y I. . • o t F k J R` d r` a, r,+ ... 7,,,, M1r' •y1nF'' _ ...... . .....„ IA. t 4 i,jY••i , • ,w i •'P; I. as, is'iR ,, I J w Q,z. {.. a r" '@iI d' p° I R • \Q VI tli ' . t9Y -..k xt ^1 •e. •J 40. i 1 •• i • • '.•, - -: . - '0; .. ! r If " 11 • 004., J• r A ./ il ;•'.' . i. ry Vt 1 • 1.i '.wYi' r IT 9 1 LI r 1 i a. 1 t 1 t w. r °,fL y a`' 7 t,, 'II r 5T fit? t It 3 'I I p+• 4/ I; cp.® +' , . 4 f i I • 4 1• 1 i t 1 i ' f x•.... j y t \'a '. 1 v , ...__ . I• 7 III '• y ,. d, r • Ito I 1'' 1 0 fie.. f sl 1 ' 1 i 1 i YNIp t- r a V p 1 4$ I G y{ i 1 I 2.. .-....a.—.9......39..... ...9......-1...-' i THOMAS DAHLBY R-044-80 APPLICANT THOMAS DAHLBY T'r1 Af_ AREA +6,000 sq f t I PR (N( IPAI. ACCESS Via Maple Avenue S.W. EXIS1 I NG /ON I NG G-6000 EXISTING USE Existing single family residenLe I'R()PC)SEU USN Rezone to permit use of rt'sidel'ce I'm an office and construct I ,000 y if storage buTldin<j._ .._.. . --__ ____- --- - --- ___ .-- COMPRE M NS I VE L.AND USE PLAN M4NUFACTURI',•; I ARK COMMEN rs 3213 Mountain View North Renton, Washington 98055 January 9 , 1981 City of Renton Planning Department Renton, Washington 98055 Gentlemen: RE: Justification Letter for Section 4-716 (A) We believe our request for a reduction of the 20 foot setback along FAI 405 to 10 feet (Section 4-716 (A) ) isjustifiedbecause: 1. The subject lot was originally much larger but due to the construction of FAI 405 , approximately one-third of the property was eliminated which created an irregular , triangular-shaped rear boundary.The imposition of the 20 foot setback would leave very little property for development. 2. The 20 foot setback required by Section 4-716 (A) is required primarily to allow for future expansion of the primary state highway.In this case , the right-of-way for the state highway is excessive because it is adjacent to a major cloverleaf interchange which would not vary in the future . 3. The Planning and Public Works Department has under consideration an amendment to Section 4-716 (A) to change the setback for structures from 20 feet to 10 feet. 4. Only a portion of the proposed development on the subject property is adjacent to FAI 405 - approximately 20 feet. Ci° of Renton January 9 , 1981 ning Department Page two We feel that the proposed development would enhance the property by keeping the building in the earth tones , landscaping and required screen fencing. Si p IN M 2.• tn 2-r a,p ..=...*.2..r"***'''•""'1,7:1-1 Li r;1 0,.•4 t g.,,,,-; •-......- s .....; 3'.....-.."%it-1‘.&2..0....) U..1 I 11 Zi.2..7)1 . E, -,-...- .... .- 7...e,,.:. _.. F1,...c, , - ::....".5f-a..., • 2., 44I, 47 2 3grl *.: ,-,-,-.7,.:;..z-IE---:.-. ,r I. L---. 0 a. 5 d.,.. I, N,l,/ ',;-c_,rc,A.c_v,e" F,l 1 I '.... I) ri ca 1 4 e.r.,.. ..:=•,,f 0;._ .,___-. ,,,......., , c - p•-5 t-, 0 etf tr*.-,t... 4 I.Cri 021-.e3f.7-• — 77—' ic ----.." 7 '.... r; t.. 5. 1. deve I opn-ien t p I a n th f i...A.T 1, 7--.7.-"- „.- : -.. .___. r -.• ''- EP I:--,-.....,,,:' ''..„-;-.7.'-\\_:..ii, ;-Ae-<.---r---: ,;/,->- •----- n. V I'''' •h. --. . -.: '-..- v.• 1 ...._,„_, 44-. 11,•:,-,. .,. . ,, A.: 2.1til - •k-,• 1,......_,..- I lifs C'W‘411+.4 51-1: 11'11.il111' 1.. lillitil ;L1' lip 0 oillilli ill i 0 rV I C I N ! TY PLAN T DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 •.--'— - -—a Scpt 1 ISCO I.I Apr I le-BO' APPLICATION DOCUMENTS FOR d• t • T 0 ti D A II L B Y iicinity map I 1II . goodf • I low , architect• • 120 de Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application :0.60 ® Orr % I, ;' ' IP a ae°c„ q-ane .-;) . .. td,'., Location : J9P4. 4 T 0451e 44ps Applicant : tad/1 a-r4i(ortlgr. ih-. • TO; Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : : .••`7 '"' I. Police Departmentp R. C. MEETING DATE . 4.'. " ZY Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Gr Utilities Engineering fc I Fire Department Other ) : c. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION 'SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITIN F T APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :UO A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF Y R DE ARTMENT DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA 0 THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON 0 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved • ar-- 84,-__ A2,4/Signature of Director o Auth rized Representative Date I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :Emit / %-/ Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved L J6\c Signature of Director or Authorized Representative . Date Jzi1i Pla12-n1ni979ng RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : if / e CP.-00 3-, F —Cr ref&lop cod steit e at ao ° ccee . q--E4teM) 131,5 ifeY 0 Location : Jq® a `ts ! kw; Applicant : ,/ Ly 1 .•.on,fiS n TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : f Police Department R, C. MEETING DATE . 11r Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : I COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING F' • T APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ONe7AT9 : 00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DE ARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEAA PROV rE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON it REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : c-D _-_-- 1 Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved z c ZZ--g ISignatur,e'of `Director or A thorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Iy P1 a'nni n2 ! .I 12-'I979 i RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT` DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : VA 64 14 Ale eVez° ;. r ' 0 rfsue aid.5 4 L al ; &A J P " gym' to lyp' Location : f ®a o J Applicant : i TO; Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 4 1 Police Departmen R, C, MEETING DATE" . ` 4' %, t , Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITINGFe,' 1 APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON 4 %' r:•'` AT 9 :0U A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, IF YOUR DE'ARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA PROV 'E THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON fZ7(Ø/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE xxxxxxx Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Le. D.R. Persson 1/23/81 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date iZz) i; P1 anni r 12-197C RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : `r` ' 1 0'60 GP e at attla0 ece. , q-;,1e6g0 0 Location : Jg4lp1p M*lee. c 'fz Applicant : TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ,',,..{, Police Department R. C. MEETING DATEw Public Works Department 1 Engineering Division I 6,"Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING F ' T APPLICATION RIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON r, ATEV9:OU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF AIR DE ARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA PROVI E THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : r `- Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved j C 7 kv2.:'/W2 • r"i '.i C J IA /-,2 C`1 Signature of Director or Authorized RepresentItive Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date CITY OF RENTON REZONE APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY LAND USE HEARING APPLICATION NO. 0=.L -1 ®EXAMINER 'S ACTION 4PPLICATION FEE $ APPEAL FILED RECEIPT NO. CITY COUNCIL ACTION 7ILING DATE Ufa ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE FEARING DATE siPPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : Name Thomas R. Dahlby Phone 226-6063 Address 3213 Mountain View North , Renton, Washington 98055 Property petitioned for rezoning is located on 1402 Maple Ave . S . W. between 405 and S . W. 16th Square footage or acreage of property approximately 6000 square feet Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) Lot 22 , Block 21 , C. D. Hillman ' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle , Division No. 1 , according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats , page 74 , in King County, Washington except that portion thereof condemned in King County Superior Court Cause #588861 . Existing Zoning GS6000 Zoning Requested L-1 OTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiat • your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Appli.catioi'. , Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this for , in duplicate . Proposed use of site office and storage List the measures to he taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. noise level should not be a problem because of heavy traffic noise existing t of 405 . Traffic level will not increase. Porposed alterations and addition ;'. , will upgrade area. How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? within on year . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required . Planning Dept . 1-77 t'''''1k. t'.,V,i,;44111.„, !•4.',,—.. ,',.1.,:f.',i,,4 1. t 4, ..4''',4. Cy, '''Vr,:,'!:1 e :,,, W 1P4. ?e: I.4 t''' 1 ill..rt. ' 172Y.-1• 4 11; I• K. n .., d„...., 4t.t 1 4\„0,41; ikbi i,rv,..i„., I' It 1. •::'•,-'il 1,74, A^ '• .411t,,,,i5,..,, ',,t,o' r . 1.1• ,, t 747.., 1•11.,•';kt: -111, 1..?,;16-i—,;,r4f1 i''''''1,L',:', r"" ±:` . 1' :.' .Vi,•.:1'''.; 114 v r '..' '..'.1.l'. ''''-4,,Ffire-; ;,,'.:I.tei It...",-71.k _ '•'•*•' , : •-tI•.7..' tlitL••,;"1 .....-,:--,-, • vi ••.• ,..3 O.:2; %., ft""i",--.,, •, 'Xii ''' si '1'1' :. ',„. • te 4, 1.44.,p, - , ,,. , ,4 , . "4:." .0' 11', . . • 11.. i -..., •, , ,/,„* ,'I ''''''• -.. '' ''• , ' 1 I* ...1 i'.. -1;4`P 1,..,: , ei,r,, . ..., ,,• #4,,,,.,IA,'-•;,. ••,,,-,- ' ',,!;" ,, ••• .,• ,,;„.. A , 1,P71, 4:7:,,,,;P:' , ":, "t"•;:,',/, ..,•' L.,, t , ?- 1: r,-,16...',.,. ..' '..ii• ''. Ot,:•*;'TOrif ' ''' •' ..... '''''''.' • t) -;'Cs C. ,",• t . • ki, , ., 4. l.' i•••."'• • i ...-,,,,1,, *., •.-F,, ,il-p' ,,t.i',. ,',i'l 1' ti'li .. 9' 1.1 4 V, v .1,1 R.3.•". :: ''.1 401,} -'.'::''''''' "PI'.'' :.7'.f.: ''',1 • '. ""' k '4.1 ','1`• '`..V GEN .1'" ,i',1 LOCATION: A '',*. •'''*' ADDRESS:9 1402 MAPLE AVENUE S;W. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT i S POSTED' TO NOTIFY PROPERTY 0 cq ERS OF 4.•.•, f:.." 1,'. t,,,: 1gt1./ t:;' ''' t' P, i,',,','-',' i, f :''•1',1111011,!! 7:0''1,' 1''''' -.! Q, 1 I. I'',: r. •„ i''',; e',:a': 1(,;, 4....,4' 4: h „,•'. A,-.;..., i, .:,."1,•" 1-:„.... 1.1, ''',. I"'..: ',:•';;, .,,,;,' ••''rn,, I TO I li, rNCITYCIPLINCILClult ,t, ,ER 7r, MUNICIPAL i't,UILDING ON FEBRUARY 24; 1981 BEGINNIcG AT 9: 00 A.M. P.M. G MIMI P 4 i ,.,R41;„ .,,-= i,o, vr..,. ... •,, ,.• 4-, , ., I 1 D k..-.... ' .. q' •i4 .4-t lte , t 0 t,„,;•,' ' '7••,% m ot, N3' 4t'.,,/"1••`• L,';.`'.t.'-,,i;Alml' •.to'o' 4•.... ',' 1,'.'t'.,i' 5,": 1 e',,. t, 1 t,'" `‘ t'',;"''';-'' .ii. 4 '‘'....1.110. rilii,1 lit .. ,, ,kfeli, ylit ,, .1--" k , ,,,, 1' 1'• • •11! -I'' ''I"' •'‘,, i "-/' •• 'in t 44.44`4, ,' • 4, 1;;;. 1. ..,, IA• -.., ..-.;;, .•.,,.,E 4 , It 4' 4 i.•,; ft441, • '14 .,,N• ir, 8' '1 .A"4.*. 441P ".:.'." ! ' ,, '4;i1, 1',4::. „: I.,, 8.' i 41,, t, t..,:46'..",,', ::.''',41,1:, :'.,.•1 ', EL': ',C r: :' ,,,• el ...,'; r ,! ' , 1 , ,„ri ii: ta '. ., it11.-'3 ;,,„,,,,., ,t ',,, ,t• 7:f x an' 't ‘• "e. , ,PR MI' VARIANCE FROM ZONING ORDINANCE SETBACK REQUIREMENT 4 firi VARIANCE FROM PARKING AND LOADING ORDINANCE RE, AISLE WIDTH AND STALL LENGTH 1 1 , Fit ' JRTHER INFORMATION CALL 23 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REIVOltr;* WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION AFFIDAVIT I , Thomas R. Dahlby being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief . Subscribed and sworn before me this -Zfj day of 19 194 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Name of Notary Public) g ature of 0 er J'.3 5 4 41f/OfJ 3213 Mountain View North Address) Address) Renton, Washington 98055 City) State) 226-6063 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By : Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR OFFICE-. USE ONLY Application No,. L Environmental Checklist No. ..47:02--67,..S J PROPOSED,' date: FINAL , date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration 'of Non-Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduct"ion The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43:21C, RCW, requires all .state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared forall major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposa'l is'such a major action. Please answer :the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently• available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you„believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports .or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant''•to the answers' you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- • out unnecessary delay. The .following.,questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are• currently. applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers . should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though'.completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the ,agenctes which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating- paperwork in the future. NOTE:• This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State • , of Washington'for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your.proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question.• ' • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . • BACKGROUND 1: Name of Proponent Thomas R_ nahlby 2..` Address and phone number of Proponent: - 3213 Mountain View North, Renton,. Washingt-nn g81)55 Residence phone: 226-6063 Work phone: 762-430'3 3. Date Checklist submitted 4 Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton 5.. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. '' Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Alter existing residence to office and construct approximately , 1,000 square foot storage building . Occupancy: 2 persons , 14 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in : a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES MAYBE NO c) , Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?X YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration, surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE NO f), Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through ' interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available X for public water supplies? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (b) parking area 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X - species? YES MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YES" MAYBE NO Explanation: (a) & (c) more due to landscaping. i . 4- 5) Fauna. , Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO d) , Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation : 6) • Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: property located adjacent to 405 resulting in heavy traffic noise. 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 8)- Land Use.' Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: conforming to City of Renton Comprehensive Plan . 9).. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in : a)— Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO b). Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation:• 10) : Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- l • bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? . X YES MMAYBE NO Explanation: change existing single family residence to office use with occupancy 2 . Should result in equal impact. 5- 12). ,. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create; a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO ' Explanation : house presently rented b in need cif rep i rc 16) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand Xfornewparking? YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?X YES MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (a) possibly more movement during business hours but none after business hours . b) will provide off street parking. f) dead end street. 14) • Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? X YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO e) • Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services?X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: ' (a) fire hydrant avai labl.e at property line. 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) ' Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) . Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of- new sources of energy? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 16) Utilities . Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? X_— YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems?X YES MAYBE NO c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO 6- d) . Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO• e), Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal ? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation:- 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)?X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public , or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view?X YES MAYBE NN Explanation: will upgrade' the area. 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20). Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my kno -dge t • .bove information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead ag-n y •. ij driw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in re i . c •of t is cjecklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful 1 . . s 'ul d's i ' I re on my part. Proponent: signed Thomas R. Da by name printed) f City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 i OF 124, VARIANCE APPLICATION CITY OF RENTON 009 P PLANNING DEPARTMENT qTE p SEP.1 . 206) 235-2550 c NOTE: TO APPLICANT: Please OFFICE USE ONLY read instructions on back of this form Application No. :o o .3 ,,- / carefully before Associated File(s) : preparing your appli- cation for VARIANCE. Date Received: Date Accepted: Approved: 0 Denied: DATE: Publication Date: Affidavit: Comprehensive Plan Zoning: o"- In addition to the information below, the applicant should include a site map and any other pertinent information which will assist in the review of this application. The Planning Department reserves the right to require additional information .nheded to evaluate the application (note Variance Application Procedure on the last: page) . 1. Name of Applicant: THOMAS R. DAHLBY 2. Mailing Add/mess: 3213 Mountain View North wk: -/62-4303 Renton, Washington 98055 Telephone No. : hm: 226-6063 3. APPLICANT IS: Owner Lessee ET Contract Purchaser I Other (Specify) 4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant: Telephone No. : 5. General location of proposed project (give street address if any or nearest street and intersection) : 1402 Maple Avenue S. W. , Renton 6. Legal Description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) : Lot 22, Block 21, C .D. Hillman' s Earlington Garden Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, Page 74, in King County, Washington, EXCEPT that portion thereof condemned in King County Superior Court Cause #588861. 7. State EXACT VARIANCE REQUES'1 /SPECIFY CODE SECTION: SECTION 4-716(a) : setback adjacent to FAI-405 right-of-way from 20 feet to 10 feet. 1- 8. Why can't the property be-aeveloped within the requirements of the ordinance? Y. Due to the narrow width and irregular shape of the subject site, it makes it unfeasible to develop the property as re ui n .h . Zoning Ordinance See ,ion 4-716(A) _ AFFIDAVIT Thomas R. Dahlby being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. CS- tore o awn ' 3213 Mountain View North Address Renton, Washington 98055 City, State, and Zip Code Number) Telephone No. hm: 226-6063 wk: 762-4303 Subscribed and sworn before me this n/ day of 19NotaryPublicina, or tate of Washington, residing at Name of N ary Public Address 2- in i0.0 l J 6.0 I I: I y 67(.1h7lr-lt1 gESIOCI-ILe.a_ Z/ 13 i To roE oSEP roiz: 33.8- 1...,a 9;I (:PhTR00M .- 170 Srsi' PI PI, i 4 i'2 hjORpl$2'1 i 5# i I I'I W 5-Tv E s c co i f27U I L. DIr1Gj 9 0 yy T P>2 OGL. 1 j00 hr E e n P3 e N O — 4,0.0 c 42(.•.[Ze rf haaEEr a a tia.o PrxeeErl pEti$ fl I/oe-,.o Ig r- 1— 0 5 0 on' Z e O cl e \' e I C) p11 e n t p I El n F ikE yITE Ih Fr-n---1- RE I1TvI-1 1 1 ` 405 s`• av6;;;71 ...'s Az-- Mil ice% I), i i, f :pit. av,lun+sY SITE If Iliiii I I IIill(I 1 1Uf I. .LO H G1 pGRF.,j" 1111'frillOHGEr11E2° 0 VICINITY PLAN + DEVELOPMENT PLAN - Sept 1 1413O 0 t, wr APPLICATION DOCUMENTS FOR d • r `1 980 SA. 2 M I I T 0 M D A H L B Y V i C i n i t y m a p I a . I g o o d 4 o I l o w , architect 3213 Mountain View North Renton, Washington 98055 January 9 , 1981 City of Renton Planning Department Renton, Washington 98055 Gentlemen: RE: Justification Letter for Section 4-716 (A) We believe our request for a reduction of the 20 foot setback along FAI 405 to 10 feet (Section 4-716 (A) ) is justified because: 1. The subject lot was originally much larger but due to the construction of FAI 405 , approximately one-third of the property was eliminated which created an irregular , triangular-shaped rear boundary. The imposition of the 20 foot setback would leave very little property for development. 2. The 20 foot setback required by Section 4-716 (A) is required primarily to allow for future expansion of the primary state highway. In this case , the right-of-way for the state highway is excessive because it is adjacent to a major cloverleaf interchange which would not vary in the future . 3. The Planning and Public Works Department has under consideration an amendment to Section 4-716 (A) to change the setback for structures from 20 feet to 10 feet. 4. Only a portion of the proposed development on the subject property is adjacent to FAI 405 - approximately 20 feet. City of Renton January 9 , 1981 Planning Department Page two We feel that the proposed development would enhance the property by keeping the building in the earth tones, landscaping and required screen fencing. Sinc% rnai4y 2, Receipt " , 4;: _ 7 ). CITY OF RENTON a:M PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAME 6 - '" f r A DATE Ie. i',: f' r j Y )/ 7 /i / /yam F -1 ` /// PROJECT & LOCATION 'e /t1/t", I , ., ,:./ t' .:-.% i'3 Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total Environmental Checklist Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee TOTAL FEES " '; ,.r9' . Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank you. I ti s S711111116411 A r lig AL t.r•-, II Ih. 4 it ... n e* 6 J r r ' r r 14 r. A" Oa 4 I 2 •• r 111 15111157. 7""r‘i1511111111 4r4jik 1 rir 1 MdiraffiA A? 1 A t 4` 1111 IA 1111", mot 1 041110441110 r 1-1 1111 r r-6/015 u1/4.90,-k pliveko - 76e- 4/37)3