HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA84-008BEGINNING
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
008
t;:tCROVILMED
w,
Applicant FREDERICK J . STEINER
14. File No. R-008-84
Project Name Rezone R-1 to B-1 for 2-story ofc bldg
Property Location 700 block of Grady Way SW
HEARING EXAMINER: Date
March 13 , 1984
Recommendation Approval subject to restrictive
covenants .
Req./Rec. Date Received Date Response
Appeal - Date Received None
Council Approval - Date
Ordinance%n // 32,,1 1 Date 5/2 lg5,
Mylar to County for Recording
Mylar Recording
1
Remarks:4l.
1 F s7'2 c.T i v E Co U t N-rs 2S y o-7 1 9 10 7 Li 3
joy
a
S.
i
1 ,
f.
t4;
0007,
19 0743 E
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANRCG F 4. 00
L'HSHSL 4.00
22
WHEREAS, Frederick J. Stiener, Lillian Steiner, Dino Pates, Toula Pates, Richard Bisiack,
Gail Bisiack, Thomas McFarland and James R. Beattie, are owners of the following real
property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Lots
6 through 16, inclusive, Block 28, C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of
Seattle, Division No. 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, Page 74, in
King Cou ity, Washington.
cl
1+
WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following
r-4
orestrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described
QD real property.
NON, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions
and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the
undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: t.t lii
JUL IS 1 11i d
ROAD IMPROVEMENT r+.._ L:.4'I SIGN pi
Kali&:v ut
Part cipation in any road improvement measures including, but not limited to. the
formation of an LID for Grady Way.
DURATION
Thes) covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any
time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the
cove rants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the
Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further
docu nentation.
Any violation or breachese restrictive covenants mnforced by proper legal
proceduies in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property
owners E d' ing s ' propert ho are adversely affected by said breach.
d ' x ner , Lillian Steiner
47
Weda
Dino Pat as Toula Pates
ioJ• •
R. ard\Bisiack Bisiac
Thomas I vlcFarlan James R. Beattie
O
Cn
4-4
CO
STATE CIF WASHINGTON
ss.
County et KING
On this / 7 day of .'7it/ , 1984, before me personally appeared Lillian Steiner.
Dino Pat as, Toula Patas, Richard Biiiack, Gail Bisiack, James R. Beattie, Frederick J. Steiner
and Thomas McFarlan„ the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person(s) for the
uses and purposes therein mentioned.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal thedayandyearfirstabovewritten.
C \'/ GT//'"Ce; e Z<l
N tary Public in and for the tate of ashington.
residing at , therein.
a
04,1 tal or*
I ;
Z
fi ;
4.`
s zs
610
fir:
y
Public Notice Public Notice
Y
CITY OF
Maxine E.Motor,
fON,WASHINGTON
CityClerkORDINANCENO.3811 APPROVED BYTHEANORDINANCEOFTHEMAYORthis7thdayofMay,
Affidavit of Publication
CITY OF RENTON, 1984.
WASHINGTON, CHANG-Barbara Y.
Shim,ING THE ZONING CLAS-
SIFICATION OF CERTAIN Approval es to form:
PROPERTIES WITHIN THE Lawrence J.WarrenSTA1EOFWASHINGTON
ss•
CITY OF RENTON FROM CityAttorneyCDUNTYOFKINGRESIDENCEDISTRICT(A•
Publisttad in tits Daily Re-b 1) TO BUSINESS DIS- cord Chronicle May 11,
7.,
TRICT (B-1) (R
STEINER)
1 R1 ,
Cincy Strupp WHEREAS under Chap,''.. being first duly sworn on
ter 7,Title IV(Building Rep
limbos) of Ordinance No.'f
oath,deposes and says that
she
is the
chief clerk
of 1628 known as the"Code of
THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaperpublished six(6)times a
General
RenOrdton,",as mof
the
City of Renton,",as amend-
week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been
ed, and the maps and re-
for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,
t parts adopted in conjunction
printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper
i therewith, thepropertypublishedfour(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is
j hereinbelow described has
now and d firing all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the
heretofore been zonedasaforesaidglaceofpublicationofsaidnewspaper.That the Daily Record
Reside** Distract (R 1);
Chronicle as been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior
rto
and
Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County,
WHEREAS a pr operoper peti-
t.tio% for change of zone.
Washingtc n.That the annexed is a
Ord #3 811 4,classlfication of said proper„g
ty has been filed with ths1/
1.Buildipg & Zoning Depart- ,
v ment on or about January
13, 1984,which petition was
duly referred to the Hearing
as it was published in regular issues(and Examiner for investigation,
not in sup dement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period study and public hearing,
i and a public hearinghavingfbeenheldthereononor
One i about February 28, 1984,
of consecutive issues,commencing on the and said matter having been
duly considered by the Hear-
11t
ay of May 19
8 4 ,
and ending the
in9 Examiner and said zon-
ing request being in confor-
d miry with the City's Corn-
prehensive Plan,as amend-
da:,of 19 both date 6° and the City Council
inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sut having duly considered all
scribers curing all of said period. That the full amount of the fe
and all
relevant thereto,
and all parties having been
54. 00
heard appearing in support
charged f it the foregoing publication is the sum of $ whic thereof or in opposition
has been I aid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words forth thereto, NOW THERE-
first inser ion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequei FORE,
insertion. THE CITY COUNCIL OFF
THE CITY OF RENTON,,
WASHINGTON,
SFOLLOWS:
DO OR-t
DAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I:The following
Chief Clerk described property in the
City of Renton is hereby
rezoned to Business District
Subscribe 1 and sworn to before me this
l lth
day
e-I) as hereinbelow
specified;subject to the find-
ings, conclusions and deci-
May 19 :
14-
47e
sion of the Hearing Examin-
er dated March 13,1984;the
Building and Zoning Director
i
6Z-1 )C is hereby authorized and
Notary Public i rid fort a State of Washingti directed to change the maps
residing at Kid, King Coun of the Zoning Ordinance,as
d P.ra l Way amended, to evidence said
rezoning,to-wit:
A parcel of land situate in
Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective Jr
the northwest one quar-
9th, 1955. ter of Section 19,Town-
Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for countingwords and figui....
ship 23 North, Range 5
g
east of the Willamette
adopted by the newspapers of the State.
Meridian, King County,
t,,.;° " Washington described
r.
as follows:
giz,r• All of lots 6 through 16
I inclusive of Block 28,
CD. Hillman's Earling-
ton Gardens Addition,
VN#e7 Revised 5/e2 Division No.1,as record-
ed in Volume 17, Page
74, records of King
County,Washington.
Said property being lo-
cated in 700 block of
Grady Way S.W.)
AND SUBJECT FURTHER
to that certain Declaration a
Restrictive Convenants ex•
ecuted by Petitioner-Own.
ers on or about April 10,
1984 and recorded in the
office of the Director of Re-
cords and Elections,Receiv-
ing No. 8404300577 and
which said Convenants are
hereby incorporated and
made a part hereof as if fully
set forth
SECTION II: This Ordi-
s
nance shall be effective up-
orA its passage,approval and`
five days after its publics-'
hen.
PASSED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL this 7th day of
o.v. May,v .
aa..
s. ...:y a
r •
114.. 71c1 its:157 7 B
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANSA`r. F 4 11;
Ci:4 HEL y..+*:4. 00
cry
WHEREAS, Frederick J. Stiener & Thomas McFarlan, are owners of the following real
proper y in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows:
Lots 6 - 16 inclusive, Block 28, D. C. Hillman's Earlington Gardens
Addition to the City of Seattle. Vol. 17, Page 74, King County,
Washington.
WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive
covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real
property.
ONOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions
and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the
0 undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows:
RECORDi::D T+?
co An? 30 II C4 Nr: "u 1
SETBACKS
A. A twenty (20) foot setback shall be required along all adjacent streets of which the first
t n (10) feet adjacent to such rights-of-way shall be required to be landscaped.
B. A six (6) foot setback which must be landscaped shall be maintained along the east
property line
HEIGHT LIMITATIONS
A. All buildings shall be limited to the height provisions of the M-P, but based upon an initial
setback formula of twenty (20) feet.
SITE PLAN REVIEW
A. S,.te plan approval, as provided in the M-P zone, shall be requried of any development of
the subject site.
DURATION
These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time
improv3ments are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining
to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall
terminhte without necessity of further documentation.
FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF
OFflCE OF THE CITY CLERK
RENTON MUNICIPAL BLDG.
MILL AVE SO.
NEKTON,VIA 98055
Any violat on or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal
procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property
owners • ping subject roperty who are adversely affected by said breach.
Fre rick te'ner & Lilli Steiner c rl
G &
u a`:taaar°
R. Beat
Ric Bisiack & it • Tack
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
County of <ING
On his /(* day of (7 198 - before me personally appeared
n Lillian :Steiner, Dino Patas, Toula Paters, Richard Bisiack, Gail Bisiack, James R. Beattie,
D Frederick J. Steiner and Thomas McFarlan, the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing
D
11
instrument , and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
r person(s) f 3r the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
and year first above written.
irl a # /
1-
47/77c
N ary Publi in and or the State of Washington,
residing at /5/ 5-7'LCcC 30 , therein.
446' ; i ''/C 7y/ yet-
f7
sso, 0, -
n
ii, .-.. , -..,
4,- --
4.
4.,.. .
c, .. -,
Ei t.e_I
r , -
1 n l\ 1 J
is
e", %- ......;`, ,'-'• •,,
billy ray ( mite
architect p.a. a.i.a.
CLIT-11
VE) February 3, 1984
CITTYY OF RENTON
City of
RentonFj-if200MillAvenue, South
FEB61984Renton, Washington 98055
Attn: Planning & Zoning Staff BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
Jeanette Samek
Dear Jeanette: Re: Penta Building
Pursuant to our conversation, we are submitting a supplemental
site plan that addresses the three concerns raised yesterday.
Item #1 - Driving aisles to be minimum 24 ' -0" wide - minimum
20 ' -0" deep spaces:
Please note #1 on plan - the site depth will accomodate
24 ' wide driving aisles.
We have also shown 20 ' -0" deep spaces, however, we do
not subscribe to this criteria. Our original proposal
allows for 20' deep spaces by placing the landscape
bumper in the place of the standard precast concrete
wheel stop. This provides considerable ease in
cleaning and allows greater landscape amenity.
Item #2 - Raymond Avenue access to close to intersection:
Please note #2 on plan - we feel that our original
proposal far outweighs this acceptable solution,
and note that since Raymond dead ends to the north
and only extends a block to the south, that the 50 '
criteria far exceeds the possible traffic generated.
Also, our engineer informs us that the standard road
section is 34 ' B/B. This leaves an additional 16 '
to the property line and thus gives us adequate
turning movement with the curb cut as proposed.
Item #3 - Storm Drainage:
We have shown the latest existing storm drains as
given us by our engineers. See #3 on Plan.
Our plan here is to utilize the existing catch basin
in the recently improved alley at our southeast corner,
twenty six sixty grower court • boise, Idaho 83705 • (208) 336-8370
City of Renton
Fe3ruary 3, 1984
Page 2
along with the existing catch basin in our southwest
corner and a new catch basin in the upper parking
area that will drain to the existing catch basin
at the corner of Grady Way and Raymond Avenue.
We would appreciate your review of our latest submittal along
with a re-evaluation of the original application.
We feel strongly about green areas and would hope that our concept
finds favor. We also think the double access will lessen the Grady
Way impact and should be given positive consideration.
Since timing is so very critical , we are prepared to live with
our supplemental plan and trust this will meet with your total
approval.
Yot. have been most helpful.
Rd ectfully,
4Lre
BRE : cw
cc: Russell Corp.
Dave Kilbourn
Encls. - 3 copies supplemental site plan
R-coo-B1
billy ray strlte
architect p.a. a.i.a.
V=e1 February 3, 1984
CITY OF RENTON
City of Renton
I
200 Mill Avenue, South
LHA FEB 6 1984
Renton, Washington 98055
Attn: Planning & Zoning Staff BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
Jeanette Samek
Dear Jeanette: Re: Penta Building
Pursuant to our conversation, we are submitting a supplemental
site plan that addresses the three concerns raised yesterday.
Item #1 - Driving aisles to be minimum 24 ' -0" wide - minimum
20 ' -0" deep spaces:
Please note #1 on plan - the site depth will accomodate
24 ' wide driving aisles.
We have also shown 20 ' -0" deep spaces , however, we do
not subscribe to this criteria. Our original proposal
allows for 20' deep spaces by placing the landscape
bumper in the place of the standard precast concrete
wheel stop. This provides considerable ease in
cleaning and allows greater landscape amenity.
Item #2 - Raymond Avenue access to close to intersection:
Please note #2 on plan - we feel that our original
proposal far outweighs this acceptable solution,
and note that since Raymond dead ends to the north
and only extends a block to the south, that the 50 '
criteria far exceeds the possible traffic generated.
Also, our engineer informs us that the standard road
section is 34 ' B/B. This leaves an additional 16 '
to the property line and thus gives us adequate
turning movement with the curb cut as proposed.
Item #3 - Storm Drainage:
We have shown the latest existing storm drains as
given us by our engineers. See #3 on Plan.
Our plan here is to utilize the existing catch basin
in the recently improved alley at our southeast corner,
twenty six sixty grover court • boise, idaho 83705 • (208)336.8370
City of Renton
February 3, 1984
Page 2
along with the existing catch basin in our southwest
corner and a new catch basin in the upper parking
area that will drain to the existing catch basin
at the corner of Grady Way and Raymond Avenue.
We would appreciate your review of our latest submittal along
with a re-evaluation of the original application.
We feel strongly about green areas and would hope that our concept
finds favor. We also think the double access will lessen the Grady
Way impact and should be given positive consideration.
Since timing is so very critical , we are prepared to live with
our supplemental plan and trust this will meet with your total
approval .
You have been most helpful.
ectfully,
0j0;/
s'J 'rite
BRS:cw
cc: Russell Corp.
Dave Kilbourn
Encis. - 3 copies supplemental site plan
Renton City Council
5/7/84 Page three
Old Business
OLD BUSINESS Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chairman Trimm presented a
Transportation report recommending that the two existing leases held by
Committee Aerodyne (LAG 1608-69 and LAG 1816-71 ) be combined. The
Aerodyne Leases Committee also recommends approval of the staff request that
Combined the ground lease rate be renegotiated and a rental rate for
the old Renton Vocational Building be imposed.
Aerodyne Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chairman Trimm presented a
Sublease report concurring in the request by Aerodyne to authorize a
Authorized sublease of Aerodyne maintenance/hangar/office building to Ben
Silva and Associates subject to receipt and approval by the
City of all required financial statements and sublease
documents. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR
IN THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION)
COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Crash Fire Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chairman Trimm presented a
Rescue School report concurring in the Public Works/Airport Dept. request to
finance the expense for attendance of three firefighters at
the Crash Fire Rescue School to be held at Big Bend College in
Moses Lake, Washington, May 18, 19 and 20, 1984, and recommending
approval of the appropriate fund transfer in the total amount of
804.00 ($268/per person) . MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY CLYMER,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE TRANSPORTATION
AVIATION) COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Drainage Lease Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chairman Trimm presented a
Easement at report recommending acceptance of request from John Harer, owner
Renton Airport of property adjacent to the Renton Airport Perimeter Road north
of the Rainier Avenue entrance, to route a storm drain discharge
pipe from his property to the northern, undeveloped portion of
the City's Perimeter Road right-of-way. The Committee also
recommends that at the time of construction, the applicant retain
a bonded contractor, obtain a construction permit, and post a
bond in the usual manner. An easement and hold harmless
agreement will be required for the storm line. MOVED BY TRIMM,
SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE
TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) COMMITTEE. Upon inquiry, Chairman
Trimm clarified that this matter is not associated with access
in any way. MOTION CARRIED.
Coulon Park Councilman Stredicke questioned designation of authority over
Restaurant change in occupant at Coulon Park restaurant. Mayor Shinpoch
explained authority of autonomous Park Board over City parks,
with City Attorney and Finance Director available to the Board
if advice is sought regarding change in concessionaire.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report
Committee recommending the following ordinances for second & final reading:
Ordinance #3810 An ordinance was read amending portions of Chapter 21 , Title
Board of Public IV (Building Regulations) of the City Code changing the hearing
Works Ordinance board for dangerous building complaints from the Board of Public
Works to the Hearing Examiner and the jurisdiction of appeals
from the Hearing Examiner to the Superior Court. MOVED BY
CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS
READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Ordinance #3811 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of
Steiner Rezone property located in the 700 block of Grady Way SW from Residence
R-008-84 District (R-1 ) to Business District (B-l ) ; Steiner Rezone; File
No. R-OO8-84. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL
ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
First Reading Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report
recommending the following ordinances for first reading:
1984 Electrical An ordinance was read adopting the National Electrical Code,
Code 1984 Edition by reference, and amending Section 4-301 of Title
IV (Building Regulations) of the City Code. MOVED BY CLYMER,
SECONDED BY REED, THIS ORDINANCE BE REFERRED BACK TO COMMITTEE
FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED.
WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
MAY 7, 1984
The 'gays and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second
and Final reading:
Amending Board of Public Works Ordinance and other related ordinances
Steiner Rezone, R-008-84 (700 block of Grady Way SW)
The Days and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first
read ng:
Adopting 1984 Electrical Code
The flays and Means Committee recommends the following resolutions for reading
and idoption :
Fund Transfer for Aerial Photographic Enlargements
Authorizing Mayor and City Clerk to Execute Documents Requesting
Allocation of Federal Funds
Authorizing Bank Signatures
APPRCVAL OF VOUCHERS
The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 035
through No. 287 in the amount of $394,0113.35.
Earl ;lymer, Chairman
John teed
Nancy Mathews
Renton City Council
4/23/84 Page six
Ordinances and Resolutions continued
Ordinance #3809 An ordinance was read amending portions of Chapter 21 , Title
Dangerous IV (Building Regulations) of the City Code changing the hearing
Building Code board for dangerous building complaints from the Board of Public
Works to the Hearing Examiner and the jurisdiction of appeals
from the Hearing Examiner to the Superior Court. MOVED BY
CLYMER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADOPT THIS ORDINANCE AS READ.
ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
First Reading Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report
recommending the following ordinances for first reading:
Board of Public An ordinance was read amending the City Code as follows:
Works Amendments Portion of Chapter 41 , Title I (Administrative) , relating to
fee schedules; Chapter 6, Title II (Commissions and Boards)
relating to duties of the Board of Public Works; portion of
Chapter 1 , Title IV (Building Regulations) amending portion
of the Building Code; portion of Section 4-722, Title IV
Building Regulations) relating to Home Occupations; portion
of Section 4-2204, Title IV (Building Regulations) relating
to Driveway Grades; and establishing a new chapter 12,
Title IX (Public Ways and Property) relating to Excess Right-
of-Way Use. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL
REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR TWO WEEKS. CARRIED.
Steiner Rezone An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of
R-008-84 property located in the 700 block of Grady Way SW from Residence
District (R-1 ) to Business District (B-l ) ; Steiner Rezone; File
No. R-008-84. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL
REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR TWO WEEKS. CARRIED.
Resolutions Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented the following
resolution for reading and adoption:
Resolution #2539 A resolution was read adopting the 1984 Comprehensive Parks
1984 Comprehensive and Recreation Plan. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS,
Parks Plan COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Aerial Photographs Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report
indicating that the matter of fund transfer to acquire aerial
photograph enlargements of the Forbes litigation negatives will
be held .for two weeks to assure they are not duplications of
aerials already owned by the City.
Voucher Approval Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report
recommending approval of Vouchers 57132 through 57426 in the
amount of $625,066.34, having received departmental certification
that merchandise and/or services have been received or rendered.
Vouchers 57128 through 57131 machine voided. MOVED BY CLYMER,
SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS. CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED.
Time: 9:52 p.m.
MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk
WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
APRIL 23, 1984
OR)INANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Th,! Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for
se,:ond and final reading:
Amended Ordinance Regarding Commission on Human Rights & Affairs
Ordinance Amending Powers and Duties of Mayor
Ordinance Amending Dangerous Building Code
Dalpay Rezone Ordinance rezoning property from R-1 to B-1 , subject to conditions.
Thf Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for
f i i st reading:
Board of Public Works Ordinance Amendments
Steiner Rezone Ordinance (R-1 to B-1 for property located in the
700 block of Grady Way South)
The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolutions for
reading and adoption:
Fund Transfer for Aerial Photographic Enlargements of the Forbes
Litigation Negatives ` The Committee recommends this be held for one week.
1984 Comprehensive Parks & Recreation Plan
APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS
The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 57132
through 57426 in the amount of $625,066.34.
S ..I:I-1-J 6U ' Lge,e10..-
Earl Clymer, Chaim
NI\IJohn Reed
L__// ,/,‘„(
4, -#
04,za&....
Nancy Matws
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
April 16, 1984 Municipal Building
Monday, 8:00 p.m. Council Chambers
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the
flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order.
ROLL CALL OF ROBERT J. HUGHES, Council President; KATHY A. KEOLKER, RICHARD M.
COUNCIL MEMBERS STREDICKE, JOHN W. REED, NANCY L. MATHEWS, THOMAS W. TRIMM, EARL
CLYMER.
CITY STAFF BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney;
IN ATTENDANCE MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; JOHN M. MCFARLAND,
Personnel Director; MARILYN J. PETERSEN, Deputy City Clerk;
LT. H. RAY CALDWELL, Police Department.
PRESS Pat Jenkins, Renton Record-Chronicle
MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL APPROVE THE
MINUTES OF APRIL 9, 1984 AS CORRECTED. (Page 1 , Public Hearing
on LID 314, should reflect Mayor Pro Tem Robert Hughes opened
the public hearing) . CARRIED.
CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which
follows the listing:
Bid Opening for City Clerk reported bid opening on 4/11/84 for Phase II of
Phase II of City City Shops Project; seven bids received; Engineer' s Estimate:
Shops Project 163,686.60 including sales tax. Refer to Community Services
Committee. (See later motion. )
Steiner Rezone Land Use Hearing Examiner recommended approval subject to
R-008-84 restrictive covenants of Frederick J. Steiner Rezone, File
R-008-84, R-1 to B-1 , for property located in the 700 block
of Grady Way SW. Refer to Ways and Means Committee.
Main Street Policy Development Department requested subject of Main Street
Project Review Project in the City of Renton be reviewed. Refer to Community
Services Committee.
Airport Leases Public Works Department submitted letters from Aero-Dyne
Corporation requesting lease renegotiation and approval of
proposed sublease to B. Silva and Associates. Refer to
Transportation (Aviation) Committee.
Consent Agenda MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT
Adopted AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE Letter from former Council Member Randall Rockhill was read
Randy Rockhill expressing gratitude for the thoughtful cards, flowers, and
Recovering calls he received during his recent stay at Valley General
Hospital .
OLD BUSINESS Council President Hughes presented a Committee of the Whole
Committee of report recommending approval of the 1984 Comprehensive Parks
the Whole and Recreation Plan. Further recommended was referral to the
7-9ig4 Comprehensive Ways and Means Committee for appropriate legislation. MOVED
Parks and BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE COMMITTEE
Recreation Plan REPORT AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke requested
Referred 3/19/84) the Administration prepare a report containing three or four
major projects (not exclusively park oriented) which have
bonding capability for the City to pursue in the future.
P-1 Channel Council President Hughes presented to Council the gold shovel
Groundbreaking used to break the first ground for the P-1 Channel Project in
ceremonies today. Councilman Hughes reported excellent attendance
at the groundbreaking by adjacent city Mayors, Council Members,
and representatives of the Soil Conservation Service. Public
Works Director Richard Houghton and Engineering Supervisor Bob
Bergstrom were commended for their exceptional efforts through-
out the planning of the P-1 Channel Project.
r
OF RA,A
o THE CITY OF RENTON
Z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
oBARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR,
IIMNO
0
43. CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500
o P
9
TF0 SEP
E1,O
May 9, 1984
Billy Ray Streit
2660 Grover Court
Boise, ID 83705
Subject: City of Renton Ordinance
Steiner R 008-84
Dear Mr. Streit:
The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of May 7 ,
1.984 has adopted Ordinance No. 3811 changing the zoning
classification of certain properties within the City of
Renton for Residence District (R-1) To Business District
B-1) R 008-84.
As a condition of the rezone a Restrictive Covenant was
required and filed with King Co Records and Elections receiving
recording no; 8404300577 .
A copy of the ordinance and restrictive covenant is enclosed.
Sincerely yours,
CITYY OF RENTON
Maxine E. Motor
City Clerk
MEM:db
cc: Hearing Examiner
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO . 3811
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN
PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM
RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-1) TO BUSINESS DISTRICT
B-1) (R-008-84 STEINER)
WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) of
Ordinance No . 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in
conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has
heretofore been zoned as Residence District (R-1) ; and
WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification
of said property has been filed with the Building & Zoning Department
on or about January 13 , 1984, which petition was duly referred to the
Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing , and a
publi: hearing having been held thereon on or about February 28 , 1984,
and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner
and said zoning request being in conformity with the City ' s Comprehensive
Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all
matters relevant thereto , and all parties having been heard appearing
in support thereof or in opposition thereto , NOW THEREFORE ,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FCLLOWS :
SECTION I : The following described property in the City
of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) as hereinbelow
1-
specified; subject to the findings , conclusions and decision of the
Hearing Examiner dated March 13, 1984; the Building and Zoning
Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of
the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit ;
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part
hereof as if fully set forth.
Said property being located in 700 block of
Grady Way S,W. )
AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive
Covenants executed by Petitioner-Owners on or about April 10 , 1984 and
recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections ,
Receiving No, 8404300577 and which said Covenants are hereby
incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth.
SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage,
approval and five days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 7th day of May ., 1984.
Maxine E Motor, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 7th day of May . , 1984,
t:.-Cu-bc tin. `iiLrt.[C
Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor
Approved as to form:
C:4"-""l'e' 6-4".€-"--°
Lawrence J. Wa/ en, City Attorney
Date of Publication: May 11 , 1984
EXHIBIT "A"
Ordinance No. 3811
A parcel of land situate in the northwest one quarter of Section 19,
Township 23 North, Range 5 east of the Willamette Meridian, King County,
Washington described as follows :
A 1 of Lots 6 through 16 inclusive of Block 28, C. D. Hillman' s Earling-
tEn Gardens Addition, Division No. 1 , as recorded in Volume 17, Page 74,
rEcords of King County, Washington.
y/e4W
MI
j-
7
lel ?
mod.+
1 --- -- /
v/
b
I
I
I
I
o
11I -
o , -
i ,
ig
7.
2.\\_.
ju\
7:
liFir
0. ....„
000011 • '
1010
7, .. ,
7---------
N.
10.
1-- \, \,•,,,
1
1,
III\
1
1
Imi(i/
0 (
NA : :, ,,: . .,
1121,
131 :
1,
21:
1: ,
111 . •:•.•_.
1111
ill
rx,
1
Hi
i. ,,,\ _,,
ititt......---
2,-.--
1•1_(
7.-..•._--
7._ ._-._ -..
z1.:--
lz.."="...'.....
1.-..
z._..--.=_-----...-_... -:
1
II
iAJ
fI!'
j
r
L._
ii
c. \
ri
j/
r1\
I
d
7
I'
II
FIT:
ti
II
1s.
i
t
r
it
I
r
1I
i
1,
r
M=•----_.'
1. , •.
1
r
1
4-
r
III
I .-..: ,
I`
CC ji: 111:
l
r:
1 . _______
r (.'-,
ninkillrl ' . '
aj. :
11*
VA
rI '
nill
dEl.
0 ...
1 .
i
a..,
u , , ,__:_,„, ,, ,,,
i. ,,
7____ __ . ....
Uk
V4l-,
H
1
0
1,?
fa,.:-.
I
A ,
1 , _, . --,..--
7.....,
il, ,,,,
171 ---
1------------------/-.....
Aw .
M
5
I -
A
II ,.
i._ ...
1
1
1
ley ';
i.
r1.
II::\.
7-
724-.-
isim
4"; .
I .
ra ::..... , , ,: :,.,,,,
i
s' ,.-
im
I
v
111
J
1
II
J
Ju,
i
3NNVN
j
1-
f `:
M. i\
k :....
0
mot"
1
For. Use By City Clerk's Office Only
A. I . # b
AGENDA ITEM
RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING
SUBMITTING
Dept./Div./Bd./Comm.
Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of April 16, 1984
Meeting Date)
Staff Contact Fred Kaufman
Name) Agenda Status:
SUBJECT:
R-008-84 Consent
X
FREDERICJ. STET Public Hearing
Correspondence
Ordinance/Resolution
X
Old Business
Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach
New Business
Study Session
A. Exariner's Report: 3-13-84
Other
B.
C.
Approval :
Legal Dept. Yes No N/A
COUNCIL ACTICN RECOMMENDED: Approval Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A
subject to restrictive covenants ; referral Other Clearance
to Ways and Means Committee.
FISCAL IMPA(T:
Expenditure Required $
Amount $ Appropriation-
Expenditure
Budgeted Transfer Required
SUMMARY (Baciground information, prior action and effect of implementation)
Attach additional pages if necessary. )
The appeal period for the attached Examiner's Report and Recommendation expired
on March 27, 1984, and restrictive covenants have been prepared and signed.
The natter is hereby forwarded to the City Council for review and referral to
the Ways and Means Committee for preparation of an ordinance.
PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED:
See page 4 of attached report.
SliBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION.
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
WHEREAS, Frederick J. Stiener & Thomas McFarlan, are owners of the following real
property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows:
Lots 6 - 16 inclusive, Block 28, D. C. Hillman's Earlington Gardens
Addition to the City of Seattle. Vol. 17, Page 74, King County,
Washington.
WHERE AS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive
covenaIts running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real
property.
OW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions
and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the
undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows:
SETBACKS
A. A twenty (20) foot setback shall be required along all adjacent streets of which the first
ten (10) feet adjacent to such rights-of-way shall be required to be landscaped.
B. ik six (6) foot setback which must be landscaped shall be maintained along the east
property line
HEIGHT LIMITATIONS
A. all buildings shall be limited to the height provisions of the M-P, but based upon an initial
setback formula of twenty (20) feet.
SITE PLAN REVIEW
A. Site plan approval, as provided in the M-P zone, shall be requried of any development of
the subject site.
DURATION
These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time
imprc vements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining
to thy: specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall
terminate without necessity of further documentation.
y
Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal
procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property
owners ng subject roperty who are adversely affected by said breach.
7/-1--.Z '- 4-- --,,. .%__AiL...idr
Fre rick J te'ner & Lilli Steiner omas c(--
ai)
rl
u_a :tas
R. Beat e
Ric Bisiack & c.il/
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
County of KING
On this o day of 2, 24J 198* before me personally appeared
Lillian Steiner, Dino Patas, Toula Patas, Richard Bisiack, Gail Bisiack, James R. Beattie,
Frederick J. Steiner and Thomas McFarlan, the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
and year first above written.
a ,/ Lc,/
N ary Publi in and or tstate of Washington,
residing at /5/ LCcc 5 , therein.
7Y/ YE'4/-U
For. Use By City Clerk's Office Only
A. I . #
AGENDA ITEM
RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Asa=c aaaza
SUBMITTING
Dept./Div. /Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner
For Agenda Of April 16, 1984
Meeting Date)
Staff Contact Fred Kaufman
Name) Agenda Status:
SUBJECT: R-008-84
Consent
X
FREDERICK J . STEINER Public Hearing
Correspondence
Ordinance/Resolution
X
Old Business
Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach
New Business
Study Session
A. E<aminer's Report: 3-13-84
Other
B.
C.
Approval :
Legal Dept. Yes No N/A
COUNCIL AC"ION RECOMMENDED: Approval Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A
subject to restrictive covenants ; referral Other Clearance
to Ways and Means Committee.
FISCAL I MI'ACT:
Amount Appropriation-
Expenditure Required $
Budgeted $ Transfer Required
SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation)
Attach additional pages if necessary. )
Th< appeal period for the attached Examiner's Report and Recommendation expired
on March 27, 1984, and restrictive covenants have been prepared and signed.
The matter is hereby forwarded to the City Council for review and referral to
the Ways and Means Committee for preparation of an ordinance.
PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED:
See page 4 of attached report.
SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION.
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
WHEREAS, Frederick J. Stiener & Thomas McFarlan, are owners of the following real
property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows:
Lots 6 - 16 inclusive, Block 28, D. C. Hillman's Earlington Gardens
Addition to the City of Seattle. Vol. 17, Page 74, King County,
Washington.
WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive
covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real
property .
NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions
and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the
undersicned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows:
SETBACKS
A. A twenty (20) foot setback shall be required along all adjacent streets of which the first
tel (10) feet adjacent to such rights-of-way shall be required to be landscaped.
B. A six (6) foot setback which must be landscaped shall be maintained along the east
pr)perty line
HEIGHT LIMITATIONS
A. All buildings shall be limited to the height provisions of the M-P, but based upon an initial
se:back formula of twenty (20) feet.
SITE PLAN REVIEW
A. Si .e plan approval, as provided in the M-P zone, shall be requried of any development of
the subject site.
DURATION
These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time
improvE ments are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining
to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall
terminate without necessity of further documentation.
r
Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal
procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property
owners • ' 'ng subject roperty who are adversely affected by said breach.
l'
Fre rick J te'ner & Lilli oas c(-- rl
ui.a t a s ,,
R. Beat
Ric Bisiack & c it
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
County of KING
On this /(, day of 19B - before me personally appeared
Lillian Steiner, Dino Patas, ula Paths, Richard Bisiack, Gail Bisiack, James R. Beattie,
Frederick J. Steiner and Thomas McFarlan, the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
and year first above written.
14,/
L4i
cZ 1.L.,/
N ary Publi in and or t Mate of Washington,
residing at /S/'y (, 'C i S , therein.
th
F
R44
1
0 o THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
O
FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235-2593
94,
SEPSE„<
April2, 1984
Billy Ray Streit
2660 Grover Court
Boise, D 83705
Dear Mr. Streit:
Please find enclosed a copy of the restrictive covenants which were required as part of
the recommendation in the above entitled matter.
Please have the property owners execute the covenants and return them to this office. If
the pr)perty owners are married or other persons have an ownership interest in the
subject property, please inform this office so that the covenants may be redrafted to
reflect the appropriate information.
If this office can be of any further assistance, please feel free to call.
Sincere ly,
Fred J. Ka fman
Hearing Examiner
FJK:cl
Enclost„re
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
WHEREAS, Frederick J. Stiener & Thomas McFarlan, are owners of the following real
property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows:
Lots 6 - 16 inclusive, Block 28, D. C. Hillman's Earlington Gardens
Addition to the City of Seattle. Vol. 17, Page 74, King County,
Washington.
WHERE AS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive
covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real
property.
NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions
and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the
undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows:
SETBACKS
A. A twenty (20) foot setback shall be required along all adjacent streets of which the first
ten (10) feet adjacent to such rights-of-way shall be required to be landscaped.
B. A six (6) foot setback which must be landscaped shall be maintained along the east
property line
HEIGHT LIMITATIONS
A. All buildings shall be limited to the height provisions of the M-P, but based upon an initial
se:back formula of twenty (20) feet.
SITE PLAN REVIEW
A. Site plan approval, as provided in the M-P zone, shall be requried of any development of
thn subject site.
DURATION
Th;se covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time
improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining
to the sF ecific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall
terminate without necessity of further documentation.
Any v olation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal
proved tires in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property
owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach.
Freder.ck J. Steiner Thomas McFarlan
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
Counts of KING
On this day of 1983, before me personally appeared
Fredersck J. Steiner and Thomas McFarlan, the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing
instrurent, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
person's) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
I'\I WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
and ye w first above written.
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,
residing at therein.
March 13, 1984
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPOR1 AND RECOMMENDATION.
APPLICANT: FREDERICK J. STEINER
FILE NO. R-008-84
LOCATION: 700 block of Grady Way S.W.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks approval to rezone .8 acres of property
from R-1 to B-1 to allow the construction of a two-story
office building having approximately 17,500 square feet.
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department
Recommendation: Approval, subject to restrictive
covenants.
Hearing Examiner Recommendation: Approval of rezone,
subject to restrictive covenants.
BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was
DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on February 21, 1984.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department
Report, examining available information on file with the
application and field checking the property and surrounding
area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the
subject as follows:
The hearing was opened on February 28, 1984, at 10:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
The folic wing exhibits were entered into the record:
Exhibit #1: Yellow file containing the application, staff
report, and other documents pertaining to
posting and publication.
Exhibit #2: Assessor's Map showing the subject site.
Exhibit #3: Illustrative site plan, conceptual only, and
not meeting city standards.
Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. He stated the applicant is
seeking rezone of .8 acre from R-1 to B-1 to allow the construction of a two-story office
building having approximately 17,500 square feet. He noted specifically that there is no
problem with storm drainage, and that more information would be necessary for determining
the impa:t of traffic and employment.
Mr. Blaylock continued by stating the ERC has issued a declaration of non-significance for the
proposal, with two informational notes: 1) the revised site plan does not comply with city
codes; however, this would be taken care of at time of site plan approval; and 2) off-site
improvements would be required on S.W. Grady Way at time of development, or participation in
an L.I.D. He also noted there are other B-1 zones in the area and the trend for this area is
towards I he B-1 zoning.
Mr. Blay ock pointed out that the B-1 zone would allow a building height of 95'; the L-1 zone
allows only a maximum building height of 35', with approval being required to go over that
height. By allowing a B-1 zone next to an L-1 zone, this could create a situation whereby a 95'
building would overshadow a 35' building. He suggested implementing a pyramid process which
would inc rease building height with each increase in setback.
FREDRICK J. STEINER
R-008-84
March 13, 1984
Page 2
The Examiner called on the applicant or representative for testimony. Responding was:
Billy Ray Streit
2660 Grover Court
Boise, ID 83705
Mr. Streit indicated he was the architect for the proposal; that he sees no problem with the
height limitation proposed by staff, but believes it may be difficult to pyramid on this
particular lot because of the 98' depth. Mr. Streit requested Condition (b) of the staff
recommendation be rephrased to require building setback of ten feet from all public
rights-of-way and 6 feet of landscaping between the parking and arterial street.
The Examiner called for further testimony in support of the application. There was none.
There was no one in attendance at the hearing in opposition to the proposal. There being no
further comments, the hearing was closed at 10:20 a.m. The Examiner indicated his
recommendation to the City Council would be issued within 14 days.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION:
Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The applicant, Fredrick J. Steiner, filed a request for approval of a reclassification of
approximately .8 of an acre of property from R-1 (Single-Family Residential; minimum
lot size 7,200 sq. ft.) to B-1 (Business/Commercial).
2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act
SEPA) documentation, the Building & Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent
documents, was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA, a Declaration of
Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review
Committee (ERC), responsible official.
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact
of this development.
5. The subject proposal met with no opposition from the public.
6. The subject site is located on the south side of Grady Way in the 700 block adjacent to
Raymond Avenue S.W.
7. The site is relatively level and is covered with a combination of brambles, grasses, and
several alder and cottonwood trees.
8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site
is located as suitable for the development of manufacturing park uses, but does not
mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan.
9. The subject site was annexed into the city in April of 1959 by Ordinance #1745, as
amended by Ordinances #1764 of May, 1959 and #1928 of December, 1961. The site was
zoned G-6000 upon annexation, and R-1 was substituted in 1982 as a unified single-family
designation.
10. The subject site is undeveloped, while surrounding properties contain a mix of uses
including older transitional single family, light industrial, and commercial uses.
11. Reflecting the uses in the area is a patchwork of zoning districts, including L-1
immediately south and east of the site, B-1 west of the site, and R-1 further to the south
of the subject site.
FREDRICK J. STEINER
R-008-E4
March 13, 1984
Page 3
12. While the applicant proposes a 17,500 sq. ft. office building on the subject site, the plans
su)mitted were at variance with building and zoning provisions of the city and are not
binding upon either the applicant or the city.
13. A series of rezones have occurred in the general area containing the subject site and
generally bounded by Grady Way on the north and S.W. 16th Street on the south, and by
Rainier-SR 167 on the east, and Springbrook Creek on the west. These rezones
reclassified property to L-1 and B-1, while achieving some of the amenities required by
the Comprehensive Plan's designation of manufacturing park by providing street setbacks
and peripheral landscaping of portions of those setbacks.
Such conditions have been imposed by covenant. These conditions have generally included
a building setback of 20 feet with 10 feet of landscaping, together with a six-foot side
yard setback to reflect the Comprehensive Plan's requirements for openness benefiting
manufacturing parks.
Sit e plan review has also been required to provide guidance in meeting the Comprehensive
Plan's goals and policies.
14. Tt.e city, in the past in imposing certain of these conditions, has not provided similar
lo:ialty to the height limitations of the manufacturing park zone. Staff has recommended
that the guiding provisions of the M-P Zone be made applicable by conditioning the height
on setback.
15. In addition to the numerous rezones in the area, a number of new facilities have been built
in this area both north and south of I-405. The remaining single-family homes are
generally older and are surrounded more frequently by more intense uses.
CONCL JSIONS:
1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, will
not impair the public health, safety, and welfare, and in addition, is in compliance with at
least one of the three criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that:
a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use
analysis; or
b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the
Comprehensive Plan; or
c. There has been a material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in
which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area.
Tr e applicant has demonstrated that the request, subject to the conditions recommended
below, is justified.
2. TI e area, while zoned for single-family uses, has been in transition for at least the last
decade. Subsequent to the construction of I-405, the area is not generally appropriate for
single-family uses.
Single-family zoning no longer serves the development goals of the area, nor the practical
aspects of enticing quality uses to the now emerging commercial and industrial areas
surrounding I-405.
3. Since the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the site is located for
well-designed, spacious, and landscaped complexes, rezones of property in this area have
generally been conditioned to provide fidelity to those goals as closely as possible. This
has been accomplished on other properties by providing limited, though comparable,
setbacks which permit landscaping along the periphery of properties and provide for light
and air by similarly providing side yard and street setbacks.
FREDRICK J. STEINER
R-008-84
March 13, 1984
Page 4
The subject site contains more acreage than many of the site's which have been similarly
situated. Some have been as small as the 6,000 sq. ft. single-lot standard which applied,
and therefore, the 20-foot setback along public rights-of-way is reasonable along with
landscaping along the 10 feet adjacent to the public street. The six foot side yard will
similarly provide a break from the potential unbroken building wall, provide for light and
air, and permit landscaping as suggested by the Comprehensive Plan.
4. The plans as proposed for the site by the applicant do not meet code requirements, and as
other properties have been reviewed under the site plan review process, similar review
should be required of the subject site.
5. Reclassifying the subject site to B-1 would permit the applicant to construct a building up
to 95 feet in height subject to lot area constraints, whereas many neighboring properties
would be limited by the L-1 limit of 35 feet except under special circumstances. The
height limitations of the M-P Zone are not as broad since they are limited by a height
setback trade-off formula. Similar setback/height limitations on the subject site would
not unreasonably restrict development and would be more in keeping with the
Comprehensive Plan as recommended by staff.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site as requested from R-1
to B-1, subject to the execution of restrictive covenants requiring:
1. Site plan review as required in the Manufacturing Park Zone.
2. Setbacks of twenty (20) feet adjacent to all public rights-of-way, subject to the ten (10)
feet adjacent to those rights-of-way being landscaped, together with a six (6) foot wide
east side yard.
3. The maximum height of any building shall be limited to the pyramidal provisions of the
M-P Zone, but reflecting the twenty (20) foot setback of the subject site.
ORDERED THIS 13th day of March, 1984.
Fred J. Kaufma
Land Use Hearin Examiner
TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of March, 1984 to the parties of record:
Billy Ray Streit
2660 Grover Court
Boise, ID 83705
TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of March, 1984 to the following:
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Richard Houghton, Public Works Director
David Clemens, Policy Development Director
Members, Renton Planning Commission
Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director
Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Renton Record-Chronicle
FREDRIICK J. STEINER
R-008-84
March 13, 1984
Page 5
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed
in writirg on or before March 27, 1984. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the
Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the
discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may
make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of
the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such
appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems
proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such
appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other
specifie i requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the
Finance Department, first floor of City Hall.
The AF pearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one)
commur ications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use
decisior may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal.
Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the
City Council.
All communications concerning the the proposal must be made in public. This permits all
interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly
rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the
request by the Court.
The D)ctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for
Recons deration as well as Appeals to the City Council.
1 / . -_..... B-1 ' L______/"ZA
4/
1 •
4 1.*
Asour
ek +
1111111------- c
1
r - Ic •o , ,,-
I111111I
IIIiIINIIIIIIII/' '
i_i I
I
I ,
i
L— / ~
1 , , J n t
RTNCR 41111 IIlifil III 1111if'u_._ . `
s f/1I i°
1- '
t III i,. 1' IUI .
t 1 III" .
0—!
MIl,
I
1' +W Ilj ' illl ,
now,*
1
1 II : IIf
s--
I
h, 'UIIJo_
1
III
IMI
1
i jllMl! :
III
I„
ip 1< • ,
14S1
iit,q4glitgiVII110. All-,00111111',__1_,' __,- -_,-:---,--,-
E.._--.-71:___--..,.. =
or ., \,(,z/giot
M
I - tic 3 ::::.A..e5-'
7.
1.1 - :,,
E;.:::111 ' r 1
I
t! i IIIII. IIIIIIIIUI. .111111111_ wrip
yo
f
11
r- • --
r_-
i
innima
ter . Mt w
t Et
Y
1 -.
i
Q
l' ' --; - Ili
M[*.OtR O• TION CLAM NO.4I.i
I
W
u a
1
G 1
Q I m — -I
II
G1
cam111111ptEms ..[::-An n
y- -- --- - g;- ------ ....III
STIENER REZONE
R-008-84
APPLICANT FREDRICK J. STIENER TOTAL AREA ± 0.8 ACRE
PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. GRADY WAY AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W.
EXISTING ZONING R-1. SINGLE FAMILY
EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED
PROPOSED USE TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDING WITH 17,500 SQUARE FEET
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN M-P. MANUFACTURING PARK
COMMENTS
CITY OF RENTON
LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
FEBRUARY 28, 1984
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.:
COUNC L CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING
The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the
order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the
Hearing Examiner.
PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
Application to rezone aproximately 0.84 acre of property from H-1 to B-1,
f le R-010-84, and application for conditional use permit to construct an
electrical distribution substation on said rezoned property (B-1), file
C U-011-84, and application for special permit to allow 12,010 cubic yards
of preload material and structural fill on said site, file SP-012-84; located
on the west side of Talbot Road South approximately 500 feet south of
South Grady Way.
F REDERICK J. STIENER
Application to rezone 0.8 acre of property from R-1 to B-i to allow the
construction of a two story office building having 17,500 square feet, file
R-008-84; located on the south side of S.W. Grady Way between Seneca
Avenue S.W. and Raymond Avenue S.W. at approximately the 700 block.
CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Application for site plan approval to allow the reconstruction of a
riunicipal water supply well in a P-1 zoned district, file SA-013-84;
I pcated in the extreme north corner of Liberty Park, south of Bronson Way
North and west of Houser Way North.
0704Z
BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
FEBRUARY 28, 1984
RECEIVED
APPLIC NT: FREDRICK J. STIENER
FEB 2 0 1984
FILE NUMBER: R-008-84
C,TY OF
HEARING EXAMINER
ON
A. SLMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Tt-e applicant seeks approval to rezone .8 acres of property from R-1 to B-1 to
allow the construction of a two story office building having approximately 17,500
sq Jare feet.
B. GE:NERAL INFORMATION:
1. Owner of Record: Dino Patas
2. Applicant: Fredrick J. Stiener
3. Location:
Vicinity Map Attached) 700 block Grady Way S.W.
4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is
available on file in the Renton
Building & Zoning Department.
5. Size of Property: 0.8 acre
6. Access: S.W. Grady Way and Raymond
Avenue S.W.
7. Existing Zoning: R-1, Single Family
8. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-1, Single Family; R-4,
Residential - Multiple Family; B-1,
Business Use; L-1, Light Industrial;
and M-P, Manufacturing Park.
9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan:M-P, Manufacturing Park
10. Notification: The applicant was notified in
writing of the hearing date. Notice
was properly published in the Daily
Record Chronicle on February 17,
1984, and posted in three places on
or near the site as required by city
ordinance on February 17, 1984.
C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
Tt-e subject site was annexed into the City of Renton by Ordinance #1745 of April
14, 1959, which was latey corrected by Ordinance #1764 of May 19, 1959, and
Oi dinance #1928 of December 12, 1961. The property, upon annexation, was zoned
G- 6000. This zoning designation was later changed to R-1, Residential - Single
FE mily, with the adoption of the new zoning map which combined several single
fa roily designations into one classification. The zoning map was adopted by
Or dinance 3634 of June 13, 1982.
D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND:
1.Topography: The subject site is relatively flat.
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO 1 HE HEARING EXAMINER
FREDRICK J. STIENER: R-008-84
FEBRUARY 28, 1984
PAGE 2
2. Soils: Urban Land (Ur). This soil has been modified by disturbance of the
natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick to
accommodate large industrial and housing installations. The erosion hazard is
slight to moderate. No capability or woodland classification.
3. Vegetation: The subject site is covered by grasses, brambles and several
alder and cottonwood trees.
4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation provides sufficient habitat for birds and
small mammals.
5. Water: No water was observed on the site.
6. Land Use: The site is currently undeveloped.
E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS:
The area surrounding the subject site consists of commercial and residential uses in
all directions.
F. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1. Utilities:
a. Water - A twelve water line is located along S.W. Grady Way and along
Raymond Avenue S.W.
b. Sewer - A twelve inch sanitary sewer line runs east/west along the
alley adjacent to the subject site and also along Rayumond Avenue S.W.
by the subject property.
c. Storm Water Drainage - Storm water drains westward to the P-1
forebay.
2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance
requirements.
3.Transit: METRO Transit Routh #912 operates along S.W. Grady Way.
4. Schools: Not applicable.
5. Recreation: There are no recreational opportunities available to future
employees near the subject site. There are a few parks available is
employees are willing to travel 1-1/2 to 2 miles to utilize park facilities.
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE:
1. Section 4-706; R-1, Single Family.
2. Section 4-711; B-1, Business Use.
3. Section 4-744(F)(2), Landscape Requirements - Green River Valley.
H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER
OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT:
1. Valley Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan
Compendium. pg. 31-35.
2. Commercial Goal and Objectives A and B, pg. 16-17.
IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT:
1.Natural Systems: Rezoning the property will not affect the natural systems.
2. Population/Employment: More information is necessary to determine the
impact of the proposed office on population and employment in the Renton
area.
3. Schools: Not applicable.
PRELIMINARY REPOR O THE HEARING EXAMINER
FREDRICK J. STIENER: R-008-84
FEBRUARY 28, 1984
PAGE 3
4. Social: Not applicable.
5.Traffic: Maximum development of the proposed office project is expected to
generate approximately 215 average daily trips [12.3 trip ends/1000 square
feet X 17.5 (17,500 square feet office space)].
J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION:
Pt.rsuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State
Er vironmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a final declaration of
ncn-significance was issued on February 8, 1984. Two informational items were
in.luded in the declaration which are discussed below.
K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED:
1. City of Renton Building & Zoning Department.
2. City of Renton Design Engineering Division.
3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division.
4. City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division.
5. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau.
6. City of Renton Policy Development Department.
7. City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department.
L. DLPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1.The applicant, Fredrick J. Stiener, is requesting a rezone of .88 acres of
property from R-1, Single Family Residential, to B-1, Business Use, to allow
the ultimate construction of an office building. A tentative design has been
presented along with the application. It has been found to not generally
comply with the requirements of the Municipal Code and will have to be
revised to meet those specific requirements.
2. The proposed rezone generally complies with the intent of the Comprehensive
Plan designation of Manufacturing Park for the subject site. Other rezones in
the area have been principally from G-1 to to L-1, Light Industrial, with
restrictive covenants placed on them to guarantee minimum front yard and
side yard setbacks. The subject property is in an area which is in transition
from older single family residences and vacant property to commercial,
office, and light industrial uses.
3. The Environmental Review Committee has issued a declaration of
non-significance. The appeal period will expire on February 27, 1984.
The Environmental Review Committee did specifically want to inform the
applicant that the revised site plans dated February 3, 1984, is not approved.
Problems include the driveway location on Raymond Avenue, the landscaping
setback on Grady Way, and the number of parking stalls to comply with the
Parking and Loading Ordinance. In addition, the ERC wanted to place the
applicant on notice that off-site street improvements will be required to be
done along S.W. Grady Way at the time of development or the applicant has
the opportunity of signing a petition to participate in the L.I.D. for Grady
Way.
4.The Land Use Hearing Examiner must review four specific criteria under
Section 4-3014(C) to determine that the circumstances surrounding the
rezone request are adequate to recommend approval of the reclassification.
The following evidence clearly demonstrates the rezone request is
appropriate.
a. That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject
reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the
time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning.
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO Tnt HEARING EXAMINER
FREDRICK J. STIENER: R-008-84
FEBRUARY 28, 1984
PAGE 4
The subject site was annexed into the City in 1961. Both the city-wide
Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 1965, and the Green River Valley
Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 1975, clearly show the area as
designated as Manufacturing Park activities. The R-1 classification
was applied in 1982, as a result of the city code combining several of
the single family residential zones into one classification. Therefore,
the site has not been considered since the time of annexation.
b. That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being
requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan
and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is
appropriate.
The proposed rezone to B-1, Business Use, is not directly in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element
designation of Manufacturing Park for the subject site. However, the
City has approved a number of rezones in the general area to both B-1,
Business Use, and L-1, Light Industrual Use, as a result of strict
application of setback requirements in the manufacturing zone. These
setback standards would preclude the functional development of these
small lot blocks. The solution to the problem has been to impose a
series of restrictive covenants establishing minimum setback for
buildings and specific landscaped area. This policy has been utilized
since the late 1960's with the most recent application in the
Anderson-Minetta Rezone approved in June 1983 (Ordinance #3732).
c. That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the
subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private
development or other circumstances affecting the subject property
have undergone significant and material change.
Since 1975, the general area has undergone significant changes in both
the public and private sectors. The older single family residential
development is being replaced with commercial and industrial
activities. The development of property to the north, west, and east
into office uses suggests that the request is appropriate.
Timeliness
d. The final test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate is to
address the question of timeliness.
The subject property is the next incremental parcel to be developed
going from east to west. In fact, the property is nearly surrounded with
new development. Only the property to the south remains in an
undeveloped state. Public services are available to the site including
water, sewer, and storm drainage. The whole area will be tied together
under a new L.I.D. for the reconstruction of Grady Way South. Thus, it
would appear timely to allow the rezoning of the subject site.
5. The various City department have not raised any concern over the rezoning
of the subject site, but they have expressed concern that the site plan would
require major revision to comply with city codes. In addition, actual
development will require all of the necessary plans and profiles for off-site
improvements including storm drainage, storm water calculations, and street
improvements.
6.The City of Renton, in approving L-1 rezones and B-1 rezone within this
general area designated for Manufacturing Park activities, have basically
established two separate policies. Until recently it was though that imposing
restrictive covenants for setbacks in both of these rezone approvals guided
the actual development of the property. No one analyzed a secondary site
design limitation of height.
PRELIMINARY REPOR I I 0 THE HEARING EXAMINER
FREDRICK J. STIENER: R-008-84
FEBRUARY 28, 1984
PAGE 5
In the B-1 zone, a structure may be 95 feet high and can be higher under a
conditional use permit. In the L-1 zone, the structure maximum is 35 feet
with special approval required for anything over that height. Both of these
policies are inconsistent with the general perimeters established for heights
in the Manufacturing Park zone which was the specific zoning district
development for the implementation of the intent of the Manufacturing Park
land use classification of the Comprehensive Plan.
The Manufacturing Park zone creates more of a pyramid type of appoach
with unlimited height as long as the structure is setback adequately from
adjacent properties and public rights-of-way. This would appear to be a
guiding principal since the land use map of the Comprehensive Plan clearly
shows Manufacturing Park.
Under previously developed policies, we may have a B-1 zone next to a L-1
zone with a structure of 95 feet high while the adjacent L-1 parcel would
only be 35 feet high. The error is so obvious that it is almost overwhelming.
It might have been a better policy after the M-P, Manufacturing Park Zone
was created, to rezone the properties in question to M-P but with specific
variances granted for the front and side yard setbacks based on lot size and
shape.
8. Other department comments are attached for the Hearing Examiner's and the
public's review.
M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION:
Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the rezone request, file
R-008-84, be recommended for approval to the City Council subject to the
c mdition that restrictive covenants are filed requiring the following points:
a. Site plan approval including landscaping approval.
b. Building setback requirement of twenty (20) foot from all public
rights-of-way and six (6) feet from the eastern property line.
c. Maximum height limit is to be limited to the pyramidal provisions established
in the M-P, Manufacturing Park Zone.
i ...._________
1 j= .. .s-1f z,J..._
S — ,
I ,
M li
1.• . ..—i
1
a i M c•
I
c,,, ,
r- •
pi
L—--—-- -``' I— --- - L_! i
ecro ,
I pIIIN11Mr
S jiIMon. . I
I
r
1
IMIIi:1111 :1! ! M
o.
c, .-
I
IL 4%
M011 - i
i''1)
q P1! VSI35-1
i jMI! III I ;
Q .
I;gfltIxeoL111i111! •MMIU - ___-
raj "_ ,
r ____-- - - .
i
r-=
s_ E__y. 1
to
T A i
r._
ILILLIt
t 111111L.IIIfi' :ual !11'
III iIlllif '
e,
u t111Ia--- ,.'„ L-1 mew
a H-1
Y
1 ii- o
ki
I
1
I-
I
INM-MfiAQiii Da 'ION CL/.1N P.O. 4 i
m'r - -- '
I
I l
Q
n it
lb
o
Di
1n I
s •
M
I
N 1 E.' 1----'t - - k%
1
i-- u _ - --fig.
W. I 1
STIENER REZONE
R-008-84
APPL ICANT FREDRICK J. STIENER TOTAL AREA ± Q.8 ACRE
PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. GRADY WAY AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W.
EXISTING ZONING R-1, SINGLE FAMILY
EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED
PROF OSED USE TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDING WITH 17,500 SQUARE FEET
COMF REHENS I VE LAND USE PLAN M-P, MANUFACTURING PARK
COMMENTS
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/ IVISION :GG/c e A6fr eA4/9.lJT
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITION NOTAPPROVEDnn
Foy- e • e
ortfr . 4,,ic.* 1sAoi.,s a lOotr/
iIpa:4e w,'/i4
a
I
t.tike.e.A hes n eltAiPC I' /E.t T sl"4wt.Q ors-pc .
V-aaoc- /çi (a)0 0 i-{Ci s< 0i nV O' hQ lto
fA 7'h h01e„,/, cfi/ g ç,, ,,1 ,,,, ,,, old
Se('. Ili- a a 06- /44
4194.4e "Navusel, eette.4.4.0Alef..1.41AA_ DATE : 1 Sig?
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 16.
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ;13L- D
n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED
7)
DATE : / /7
7
n--G-1741 OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
l
REVISION 5/1982
Form 18.
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
J1APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED
7
DATE : 1-
S RE F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
I
APPROVED Fli 20VED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED
g!nj . 6/L•. ,..l.e-.
J
I
J
0
1L.0 p.e.,7r-.:4-t_
6?---
4-...,_
p e--il 0,_
z 2_ x Ss, )-
7.
A-L...._
vi,....
e....,..4-e,
ir_ /2o-r-1.6..
Jw3 e,„; =;.
0 gifv2-,_ cilveeek— 1,ee.. -t-e.----/,/ -e-., ‘-.,--.,----.(4.- (,.//0,_ ,...e.e...,e.- -,..'2,
1
Le,rs, -- 0fI2u3
SIGNATURE OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 18.
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : `%i-a4 el ExiklG(A/6 /JV
1 APPROVED IX APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
I. i .'
L-‹J cry e-,[I' /2 4 '< s ,---J f o 64.5 F /4,
j ., .._-1---, o L7 6, .•„t,p C")L CC,---2.4 L, L-Q-c-Q
4-5 S 1'`,L„/`-, ,
7 y J l :,
CMG, r{ (_ h /7 a CL' P '
v Z ;1'-,
DATE : '- -? /S 'c
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : T/G/
may/ 4-i G/A/,CE712/yt/6-
l !
APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
I ]
NOT APPROVED
I UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO 1 /-20-74 GV-420 0aDGs. oo
f '"
1 S'lid/'•
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - WATER E$ y/_ 9s' 0'S, 94y R 5. •o
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER NO
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - WATER
Sys '.a¢/fix 3.5 /0
y.iG -.-
41/,393 . 9?
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • SEWER k-s. 0.04/ax "
14 39-5- 9-1:
SPECIAL ASSESS!ENT AREA CHARGE • WATER No i'oz, 7r'J. 61
SPECIAL ASS'SSMENT tREA CRANE • SEWER Ai
APPRO'+EO WATER PLAN No 4eL
G
APPROVED v'I3ER PUN
APPROVED FIRE HY0I I T LOCATIONS
BY FIRE DEPT. 1/, S
FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS
r
6---JA,20L '----"1„24---___
DATE : /— •s 017
SIGNATURE
9F
DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
n.n.. C /4 non
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT) 'ISION :
t-APPRCVED
i (
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
I ] NOT APPROVED
DATE:
SI ATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
F'nrm 1 R2
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ;
I "
APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED
mil / /r/v pc X /) fames (,tC---'
f/O C(L /
ji/C 7 DATE : J / f`" 4c./
SIG ATURE OF DIR CTOR OR AUTHORIZED R PRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 18:
0325N
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIF tL:ANCE
Applicat on No(s): R-008-84
Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-006-84
Descript on of Proposal:Application to rezone 0.8 acre of
property from R-1 to 8-1 to
allow the construction of a two
story office building having
17,500 square feet.
Proponent: Frederick J. Stiener
Locatior of Proposal: Located on the south side of S.W.
Grady Way between Seneca
Avenue S.W. and Raymond
Avenue S.W. at approximately the
700 block.
Lead Agency: City of Renton Building and
Zoning Department
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on January 25, 1984, and February 8, 1984,
following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral
commerts were accepted from: Richard Houghton, Jerry Lind, James Hanson, Ronald
Nelson, Roger Blaylock, David Clemens, James Matthew, James Bourasa and Robert
Bergstrom.
Incorpoi ated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application
ECF-00 are the following:
1. Environmental Checklist Review, prepared by: Dave Kilborn, DATED January 13,
1984.
2. applications: Rezone (R-008-84).
3. F:ecommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning
Department, Policy Development Department, Police Department, Parks &
F;ecreation Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, and Public Works Department.
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not
have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW
43.21C.330(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Reasons fur declaration of environmental non-significance: The subject rezone will not
adverse'y impact the environment or adjacent properties.
INFORMATION:
1. he revised site plan proposed for this site dated February 3, 1984, is not
i,pproved. Problems to be resolved include: the driveway location along Raymond
Avenue; the landscape setback along Grayd way; and, the number of parking stalls
1 o comply with the Parking and Loading Ordinance.
2. off-site street improvements will be required to be done along S.W. Grady Way, or
igning the petition for participation in the L.1.D. will be required.
SIGNA- URES:
7
Ronald . Nelson vid R. Clemens
Buildinii and Zoning Director Policy Development Director
Richard i C. Houghton
Public Norks Director
PUBLI!;HED: February 13, 1984
APPEP L DATE: February 27, 1984
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 006 _ 84
APPLICATION No(s) : REZONE (R-008-84)
PROPONENT: FREDERICK J. STIENER
PROJECT TITLE: PENTA BUILDING
APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.8 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM
Brief Description of Project : _
t R-i 'TY1 AT.T11W TFTF PZLIAE CYINST33IJC'.l'ION OF A T
STORY QFFICE BUILDING HAVING 17,500 SQUARE FEET.
LOCArk D ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF S.W. GRADY WAY BETWEEN SENECA AVENUE S.W.
LOCATION: AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. AT APPROXIMA'r1 LY THE 700 BLOCK.
SITE AREA: 0.8 ACRE BUILDING AREA (Gross) : 17,500 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1) Topographic Changes : X
2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: X
3) Water & Water Courses : X
4 ) Plant Life:X
5) Animal Life: X
6) Noise: X
7) Light & Glare: _X
8 ) Land Use; North: WAREHOUSE
East :OFFICE BUILDING
South: MIXED OFFICE & RESIDENTIAL
West :UNDEVEJD ED
Land Use Conflicts : MINOR
View Obstruction: MINOR
9) Natural Resources: X
10) Risk of Upset : x
11) Population/Employment:
X
12) Number of Dwellings :
X
13) Trip Ends ( ITE) :215.25 TRIP ENDS
Traffic Impacts :
14 ) Public Services : X
15) Energy:X
16) Utilities: X
17) Human Health: X
18) Aesthetics :X
19) Recreation:X
20) Archeology/History:X
Signatures:
t/i1,41- /e) , 67ConaeG. Nelson avid R. Clemens
Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director
PUBLISHED: FEBRUARY 13, 1984
ichard C. Hought APPEAL DATE: FERRTIARY 27. 1984
Public Works Director
6-83
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN(
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING
EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE
SECONC FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON FEBRUARY 28, 1984, AT
9:00 A.N1. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS:
PJGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
Application to rezone aproximately 0.84 acre of property from H-1 to B-1,
f le R-010-84, and application for conditional use permit to construct an
electrical distribution substation on said rezoned property (B-1), file
C U-011-84, and application for special permit to allow 12,010 cubic yards
of preload material and structural fill on said site, file SP-012-84; located
on the west side of Talbot Road South approximately 500 feet south of
South Grady Way.
F REDERICK J. ST1ENER
Application to rezone 0.8 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 to allow the
construction of a two story office building having 17,500 square feet, file
R-008-84; located on the south side of S.W. Grady Way between Seneca
Avenue S.W. and Raymond Avenue S.W. at approximately the 700 block.
CI f Y OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Application for site plan approval to allow the reconstruction of a
municipal water supply well in a P-1 zoned district, file SA-013-84;
located in the extreme north corner of Liberty Park, south of Bronson Way
North and west of Houser Way North.
Legal cescriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning
Depart vent.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
THE PJBLIC HEARING ON FEBRUARY 28, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR
OPINIONS.
PUBLI';HED : FEBRUARY 17, 1984 Ronald G. Nelson
Building and Zoning Director
CERTIFICATION
1, JEANETTE M. SAMEK, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE
DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE
PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
Notary Public, in and or the State of Washington
residing in on the 15th
day of February, 1 4.
SIGNE D i j/4U h cQ
OF R,
C0
City of Renton Land • Use Hearing Examiner
will hold a
HEARINGPUBLIC
in
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS . CITY HALL
ON FEBRUARY 28, 1984 BEGINNING AT gm A.M. P.M.
CONCERNING: FILE R-008-84
X REZONE From R-1 To B-1
SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
To
SITE APPROVAL
SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lot:
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
VARIANCE FROM
GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS:
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF S.W. GRADY WAY BETWEEN SENECA AVENUE S.W. AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W.
AT APPROXII'ATELY THE 700 BLOCK,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT.
ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION
SIGNIFICANT 51 NON-SIGNIFICANT
OR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING &ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOU1
OF R
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
z
RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR
o
O =MO
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540
90 Go-
05)
SEP100
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
February 15, 1984
Fredrick Stiener
Thomas McFarlan
312 Rainier Avenue South
Renton, WA 98178
Re: Application to rezone property for proposed office, file R-008-84; located 700
block of Grady Way S.W.
Dear Mr. Stiener and Mr. McFarlan:
The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted theabovementionedapplicationonJanuary13, 1984. A public hearing before the City ofRentonLandUseHearingExaminerhasbeenscheduledforFebruary28, 1984. The public hearing
commences at 9:00 in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Flail.
The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at thepublichearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have
any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550.
Sincerely,
Roger J. Blaylock
Zoning Administrator
RJB:cl
0700Z-2
R TON BUILDING & ZONING E ARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 006 - 84
APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-008-84)
CITY OF RENTON
PROPONENT : FREDERICK J. STIENER
JAN 1 1984
POLICY
PROJECT TITLE :PENTA BUILDING DFVFLOPMrlIT !1PPT.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.8 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM
R-1 TO B-1 TO ALLOW THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING 17,500
SQUARE FEET.
LOCATION :LOCATED ON THE SQUTIL SIDE OF S.W. GRADY WAY BETWEEN SENECA AVENUE S.W. AND
RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. AT APPROXIMATELY THE 700 BLOCK.
TO :
0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1-25-84
ENGINEERING DIVISION
n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
I (
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
n OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON JANUARY 24, 1984
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :e/Ct/ AFVE442/0/0/ siV -
l ( APPROVEDFR'IF-31C-ROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
fO#-,e? opt a 4rt ly • 4,, hiscAows
alootrkint :
the w.'dOI/`
ofc2 tvraI /,'t A ho s 744 a Y/ s7 ts.ih d Se c
Y-aa.o6- /c X_2. (a) Of/ rLCi O wl/i Dim /ytart p . At.CO
nieSALa44IVIAde'tip4' te,/ Ig of i'r ih Cm old
Sec. Y- a a O6- /09 .
11144.440)
k
DATE : Os/2y
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
r.,,-m 1 a 7
R SON BUILDING & ZONING [ ARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 006 - 84
APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-008-84)
PROPONENT : FREDERICK J. STIENER
PROJECT TITLE :PENTA BUILDING
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.8 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM
R-1 TO B-1 TO ALLOW THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING 17,500
SQUARE FEET.
LOCATION :LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF S.W. GRADY WAY BETWEEN SENECA AVENUE S.W. AND
RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. AT APPROXIMATELY THE 700 BLOCK.
TO :
0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1-25-84
DENGINEERING DIVISION
F-1 TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
I (
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1ZBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
OPOLICE DEPARTMENT
n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
I ( OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P .M, ON JANUARY 24, 1984
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
BAPPROVED I ]
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED
7
l0DATE : /
SIGN' " ' OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
F TON BUILDING & ZONING [ ARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 006 - 84
APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-008-84)
PROPONENT : FREDERICK J. STIENER
PROJECT TITLE :PENTA BUILDING
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.8 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM
R-1 TO B-1 TO ALLOW THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING 17,500
SQUARE FEET.
LOCATION :LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF S.W. GRADY WAY BETWEEN SENECA AVENUE S .W. AND
RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. AT APPROXIMATELY THE 700 BLOCK.
TO :
0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1-25-84
ENGINEERING DIVISION
n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n POLICE DEPARTMENT
n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
OTHERS :
COMMENTS CR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON JANUARY 24, 1984
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : F7/QE
APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED
41 ,
e DATE: /- /9-ff1
RE F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
R TON BUILDING & ZONING [ ARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 006 - 84
APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-008-84)
PROPONENT : FREDERICK J. STIENER
PROJECT TITLE :PENTA BUILDING
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.8 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM
R-1 TO B-1 TO ALLOW THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING 17,500
SQUARE FEET.
LOCATION :LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF S-W_ GRADY WAY BETWEEN SENECAAVENUE S.W. AND
RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. AT APPROXIMATELY THE 700 BLOCK.
TO :
F-1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1-25-84
ENGINEERING DIVISION
n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
E] UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
0 POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
n OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5: 00 PM, ON JANUARY 24, 1984
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : C-
n APPROVED 71 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED
wu• ap-` 34,3 . 6
J
4.
0
71-- /1.47-1--
Jat
S n -
DATE :AAAPS1 ' i
3
SIGNATURE OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
1 W
R- -TON BUILDING & ZONING C ARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 006 - 84
APPLICATION NOBS) : REZONE (R-008-84)
PROPONENT : FREDERICK J. STIENER
PROJECT TITLE :PENTA BUILDING
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.8 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM
R-1 TO B-1 TO ALLOW THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING 17,500
SQUARE FEET.
LOCATION :LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE DE £.W. GRADY WAY BETWEEN SENECA AVENUE S .W. AND
RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. AT APPROXIMATELY THE 700 BLOCK.
TO :
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1-25-84
Eii ENGINEERING DIVISION
RTRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
n UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
n OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON JANUARY 24, 1984
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : l E-oki (A/6 / V
El APPROVED x APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
Gv
V
eff 1 e cal to CIo.S.
f
r p
Cf)
e5aa, s
c/
C DATE : - 5
IZSIGNATUREOFDIRECTORORAUTH ED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Fnrm 182
Fi TON BUILDING & ZONING I ARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 006 - 84
APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-008-84)
PROPONENT : FREDERICK J. STIENER
PROJECT TITLE :PENTA BUILDING
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.8 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM
R-1 TO B-1 TO ALLOW THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING 17,500
SQUARE FEET.
LOCATION :LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF S.W. GRADY WAY LETWEEN SENECA AVENUE S.W. AND
RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. AT APPROXIMATELY THE 700 BLOCK.
TO :
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1-25-84
0 ENGINEERING DIVISION
I (
TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
r-] BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
n OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 :00 P .M. ON JANUARY 24, 1984
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : U77.z.
7y 4- /At/4E.e/A/6-
n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO /-20-g4
V-
v--.¢20 a0($:
oo
yAt
S•&1 •
LATE COMERS AGREEM NT - WATER 5 9c O'(9Vy Sw. fra4 4 i
LATE COMERS AGREEM:NT • SEWER ND
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARM • WATER y,ES /Q.041/4,X 35 r '
7/
t-= '/ 393 . 9
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE SEWER Es fO,a4,c,
393' 4'
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE WATER NO 0Z, 7/7. t'/
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • SEWER NO
APPROVED WATER PLAN 11/O ii4444-g-tele4,;1-4114: 4eZ
APPROVED ',TER PLAN
APPROVED FIRE HORngT LOCATIONS
BY FIRE DEPT. yoS
FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS
DATE : /- . e° 0172
SIGNATURE F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
R SON BUILDING & ZONING C ARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 006 - 84
APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-008-84)
PROPONENT : FREDERICK J. STIENER
PROJECT TITLE :PENTA BUILDING
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.8 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM
R-1 TO B-1 TO ALLOW THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING 17,500
SQUARE FEET.
LOCATION :LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF S.W. GRADY WAY BETWEEN SENECA OVENUE S .W . AND
RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. AT APPROXIMATELY THE 700 BLOCK.
TO :
0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1-25-84
OENGINEERING DIVISION
n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
I (
UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
i (
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
OPOLICE DEPARTMENT
OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DOTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON JANUARY 24, 1984
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
R'APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED
DATE : /
i '9-,(71
SI ATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
R SON BUILDING & ZONING [ ARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
EC F - 006 - 84
APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-008-84)
PROPONENT : FREDERICK J. STIENER
PROJECT TITLE :PENTA BUILDING
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.8 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM
R-1 TO B-1 TO ALLOW THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING 17,500
SQUARE FEET.
LOCATION :LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SJDE OF S.W_ GRADY WAY BETWEEN SENECA AVENUE S.W. AND
RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. AT APPROXIMATELY THE 700 BLOCK.
TO :
0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1-25-84
ENGINEERING DIVISION
n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
F-1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
IRIPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
11BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n POLICE DEPARTMENT
0 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Ei OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON JANUARY 24, 1984
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
D APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
ITS
DATE : J
SIG ATURE OF DIR CTOR OR AUTHORIZED R PRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
0323N
NO110E OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENT ON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of
non-significance for the following projects:
F REDERICK J. STIENER (ECF-006-841
Application to rezone 0.8 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 to allow the
construction of a two story office building having 17,500 square feet, file
R-008-84; located on the south side of S.W. Grady Way between Seneca
venue S.W. and Raymond Avenue S.W. at approximately the 700 block.
CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (ECF-013-84)
Application for site plan approval to allow the reconstruction of a municipal
water supply well in a P-1 zoned district, file SA-013-84; located in the
extreme north corner of Liberty Park, south of Bronson Way North and west
of Houser Way North.
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of
non-significance with conditions for the following projects:
EARL BROWN (ECF-015-84)
Application for building permit to allow construction of two horse barns
totalling 12,240 square feet and having 68 stalls, file B-308; located between
S.W. 16th Street and I-405 and west of Oaksdale Avenue at the 1200 block.
F urther information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning
Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC
action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by February 27, 1984.
Published: February 13, 1984
N OT ICE
HE
ENARONmENTAL
DECLARATION
APPLICATION NO. R-008-84, ECF-006-84
PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION TO REZONF Q.R ACRF OF PROPFRTY FROM
R 1 TO I 1 TO Au OW CONSTRUCTION OF 17,500 SURF FEFT OF OFFICF BSI I DING.
GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED
PIERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE t E.R.C.3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION
DOES EVIDOES NOT
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
WILL 4WILL NOT
BE REQUIRED.
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:00 P.M., FFBRUARY 27, 1984
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING S. ZONING DEPARTMENT
235-2550
i
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
Mt-
0325N
F L.. DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNI \NCE
Application No(s): R-008-84
Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-006-84
Descrip'.ion of Proposal:Application to rezone 0.8 acre of
property from R-1 to B-1 to
allow the construction of a two
story office building having
17,500 square feet.
Propane nt: Frederick J. Stiener
Locatiom, of Proposal: Located on the south side of S.W.
Grady Way between Seneca
Avenue S.W. and Raymond
Avenue S.W. at approximately the
700 block.
Lead A iency: City of Renton Building and
Zoning Department
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on January 25, 1984, and February 8, 1984,
following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral
commeits were accepted from: Richard Houghton, Jerry Lind, James Hanson, Ronald
Nelson, Roger Blaylock, David Clemens, James Matthew, James Bourasa and Robert
Bergstr om.
lncorpc rated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application
ECF-0I)6-84 are the following:
1.Environmental Checklist Review, prepared by: Dave Kilborn, DATED January 13,
1984.
2.Applications: Rezone (R-008-84).
3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning
Department, Policy Development Department, Police Department, Parks &
Recreation Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, and Public Works Department.
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not
have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: The subject rezone will not
adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties.
1NFOF MAT ION:
1.The revised site plan proposed for this site dated February 3, 1984, is not
approved. Problems to be resolved include: the driveway location along Raymond
Avenue; the landscape setback along Grayd way; and, the number of parking stalls
to comply with the Parking and Loading Ordinance.
2. Off-site street improvements will be required to be done along S.W. Grady Way, or
signing the petition for participation in the L.1.D. will be required.
SIGNP TURES:
z
1/)
t /-7 79,eZ(tk
Ronald . Nelson avid R. Clemens
Buildi rg and Zoning Director Policy Development Director
Riche-d C. Houghton
Public Works Director
PUBLISHED: February 13, 1984
APPEAL DATE: February 27, 1984
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF — 006 - 84
APPLICATION No(s) : REZONE (R-008-84)
PROPONENT: FREDERICK J. STIENER
PROJECT TITLE: PENTA BUILDING
APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.8 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM
Brief Description of Project : __
R-.-.i to R-1 rrn Ar r nw THE FL1T[JE Pl1NSTR IC IOTAT OF A TWO
STORY OFFICE BUILDING HAVING 17,500 SQUARE Fb;IT.
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF S.W. GRADY WAY BETWEEN SENECA AVENUE S.W.
LOCAYION: AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. AT APPROXIMATELY THE 700 BLOCK.
SITE AREA: 0.8 ACRE BUILDING AREA (Gross ) : 17,500 SQ. FT.
DEVE:.OPMENT COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1) Topographic Changes : X
2) Direct/ Indirect Air Quality: X
3 ) Water & Water Courses : X
4 ) Plant Life :X
5) Animal Life : X
6 ) Noise : X
7 ) Light & Glare : X
8 ) Land Use; North: WAREHOUSE
East :OFFICE BUILDING
South: MIXED OFFICE & RESIDENTIAL
West :UNDEVELOPED
Land Use Conflicts : MINOR
View Obstruction:MINOR
9 ) Natural Resources : X
10) Risk of Upset : x
11) Population/Employment :
X
12) Number of Dwellings :
X
13: Trip Ends ( ITE) :215.25 TRIP ENDS
Traffic Impacts :
14) Public Services : X
15) Energy:X
16 ) Utilities : X
17 ) Human Health: X
18 ) Aesthetics :X
19 ) Recreation:X
20) Archeology/History:
X
Signatures :
7
1/(;;;
L'I/,/4
Konald G. Nelson avid R. Clemens
Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director
PUBLISHED: FEBRUARY 13, 1984
Richard C. Hought APPEAL DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1984
Public Works Director
EI;C-06 FORM #7
6-83
pa_.1 C.-E.
Date circulated : UtNUARY 18, 1984 Comments due : JANUARY 24, 1984
EXIVIRORHEMITAL CIIECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F - 006 _ 84
APPLICATION No (s ) ,
REZONE (R-008-84)
PROPONENT :FREDERICK J. STIENER
PROJECT TITLE : PENTA BUILDING
Brief Description of Pro 'ect APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.8 ACRE OF PROPERTY
FROM R-1 TO B-1 TO ALLOW THE FUT. ING
HAVING 17, 500 SQUARE FEET.
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF S.W. GRAVY WAY BEIWttN SENECA AVENUE S.W.
LOCATION : AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. AT APPROXIMATELY THE 700 BLOCK.
SITE AREA : 0.8 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross)
17,500 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
PROPOSED)
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19) Recreation :
20) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information
Reviewed by :—Title :
Date : 4--(
FORM: ERC-06
U .—rI -17iE67
Date circulated : JANUARY 18, 1984 Comments due : JANUARY 24, 1984
ENIVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F - 006 _ 84
APPLICATION No (s ) .
REZONE (R-008-84)
PROPONENT :FREDERICK J. STIENER
PROJECT TITLE : PENTA BUILDING
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.8 ACRE OF PROPERTY
FROM R-1 TO B-1 TO ALLOW THE FUTURE—CONSTRCICTI I dF A Tilt STURY OFFFCE BUILDING
HAVING 17, 500 SQUARE FEET.
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF S.W. GRADY WAY BLIWLLN SENECA AVENUE S.W.
LOCATION : AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. AT APPROXIMATELY THE 700 BLOCK.
SITE AREA : 0.8 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross )
17,500 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
PROPOSED)
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses : L/
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
j
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :gy/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DN ', I
A, 3A7120. More Information_
Reviewed by : , ,_
I .
litle : ILY1t uLU'
Date : 1,0"2°4---
FORM: ERC-06
1G?
Date circulated : JHIVUARY 18, 1984 Comments due : JANUARY 24, 1984
ENVIRONMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIIEW SHEET
E C F - 006 _ 84
APPLICATION No (s ) .
REZONE (R-008-84)
PROPONENT : FREDERICK J. STIENER
PROJECT TITLE : PENTA BUILDING
Brief Description of Pro 'ect • APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.8 ACRE OF PROPERTY
FROM R-1 TO B-1 TO ALLOW THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY o rIcE BUILDING
HAVING 17, 500 SQUARE FEET.
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF S.W. GRADY WAY t3LIWLLN SENECA AVENUE S.W.
LOCATION : AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. AT APPROXIMATELY THE 700 BLOCK.
SITE AREA : 0.8 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross )
17,500 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE
PROPOSED)
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
i
10 ) Risk of upset :X
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : N5I DOS More Information
Reviewed by : litle :
Date :
FORM: ERC-06
FIRE
Date circulated : UINUARY 18, 1984 Comments due : JANUARY 24, 1.984
ENVIRONMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F - 006 _ 84
APPLICATION No (s ) .
REZONE (R-008-84)
PROPONENT : FREDERICK J. STIENER JAN, 1 8 1984
PROJECT TITLE : PENTA BUILDING
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.8 ACRE OF PROPERTY
FROM R-1 TO B-1 TO ALLOW THE FUTURE CO1GSTRUCTram OF A TWO STORY OFf I-CC -BUILDING
HAVING 17, 500 SQUARE FEET.
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF S.W. GRAVY WAY btiwttN SENECA AVENUE S.W.
LOCATION : AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. AT APPROXIMATELY THE 700 BLOCK.
SITE AREA : 0.8 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross )
17,500 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
PROPOSED)
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DNSI // DOS More Information
Reviewed b y ° a,/zdf e,
Date :
FORM: ERC-06
P RJ
Date circulated : JANUARY 18, 1984 Comments due : JANUARY 24, 1984
ENVIRONMENITAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F - 006 _ 84
APPLICATION No (s ) .
REZONE (R-008-84)
PROPONENT : FREDERICK J. STIENER
PROJECT TITLE : PENTA BUILDING
Brief Description of Pro 'ect • APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.8 ACRE OF PROPERTY
FROM R-1 TO B-1 TO ALLOW THE FUTUR-CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY OFFICE -BUILDING
HAVING 17, 500 SQUARE FEET.
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF S.W. GRADY WAY BLIWtuN SENECA AVENUE S.W.
LOCATION : AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. AT APPROXIMATELY THE 700 BLOCK.
SITE AREA : 0.8 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross )
17,500 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE
PROPOSED)
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7) Light & glare :
8) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services : I
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DNSI v DOS More Information
Reviewed by Title :
Date : / / k(-/
FORM: ERC-06
Date circulated : umNUARY 18, 1984 Comments due : JANUARY 24, 1984
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F - 006 _ 84
APPLICATION No ( s ) .
REZONE (R-008-84)
PROPONENT : FREDERICK J. STIENER
PROJECT TITLE : PENTA BUILDING
Brief Description of Pro 'ect APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.8 ACRE OF PROPERTY
FROM R-1 TO B-1 TO ALLOW THE FUT. ING
HAVING 17, 500 SQUARE FEET.
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF S.W. GRADY WAY wtiwLLN SENECA AVENUE S.W.
LOCATION : AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. AT APPROXIMATELY THE 700 BLOCK.
SITE AREA : 0.8 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross )
17,500 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
PROPOSED)
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses :
4) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset : 17/
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Q/C.0 i G...
w1
f/LA-re_a---- S eJ 67/L.,rCt L,
l/lI
CO-
Recommendation : DNSIX DOS More Information
Reviewed by : litle :
Date :e-d
FORM: ERC-06
Date circulated : .,,,NUARY 18, 1984 Comments due : JANUARY 24, 1984
ENVIIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F _ 006 _ 84
CITY OF RENTON
APPLICATION No ( s ) .
REZONE (R-008-84)
JAN 1 1984
PROPONENT :FREDERICK J. STIENER POLICY
DFVFI OPRAPNT ncct
PROJECT TITLE : PENTA BUILDING
Brief Description of Pro ect
APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.8 ACRE OF PROPERTY
FROM R-1 TO B-1 TO ALLOW THE FUT. ING
HAVING 17, 500 SQUARE FEET.
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF S.W. GRADY WAY BLIWLLN SENECA AVENUE S.W.
LOCATION : AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. AT APPROXIMATELY THE 700 BLOCK.
SITE AREA : 0.8 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross )
17,500 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
PROPOSED)
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life : 1
6 ) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment : v
12 ) Number of Dwellings :v
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : s .44r"
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy : L/
16 ) Utilities : 4
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
s !pV(aOe ,, ore Si'ni"T ca.1j ;f( Ae pierk,-"f
Qi S@ We1Tn 9 a' ish '7 P rvv% t. !CSee CO„„r„t.e..."'f
Slier°
Recommendation : DNSI v DOS More Information_
Reviewed b y : (S itie MV K SO rt T i t l e : 456/sA,ti Pigorof °-
Da t e : j/ZskS/
FORM: ERC-06
Date circulated : u,,NUARY 18, 1984 Comments due : JANUARY 24, 1984
ENVIIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIIEW SHEET
E C F - 006 _ 84
APPLICATION No (s ) .
REZONE (R-008-84)
PROPONENT : FREDERICK J. STIENER
PROJECT TITLE : PENTA BUILDING
Brief Description of Project APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.8 ACRE OF PROPERTY
FROM R-1 TO B-1 TO ALLOW THE FUT. ING
HAVING 17, 500 SQUARE FEET.
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF S.W. GRADY WAY BLIWttN SENGECA AVENUE S.W.
LOCATION : AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. AT APPROXIMATELY THE 700 BLOCK.
SITE AREA : 0.8 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross )
17,500 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
PROPOSED)
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
L
3 ) Water & water courses :
4) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset : c/
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :P
Fr<
traffic impacts : t!y )( 1 ? 51,A1 . cCu vrla e effe,51
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy : L
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics : c---
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
L r i c t c
U
oFi . ,,,r„_<r 4e .5 w 7`<' CASc_ T ,a?/
Prvti/c4P rz.I r-P
5 tr-ec' of,
L
oCcy.74 /-a5 4 476'S
3. /
2-
2--d!9'e!/ ut,
i r c-L v74.'!.'v P a2S*c c ¢
cT
u
5'se...) 4-S L/:
off
co fi
P
Recommendation : DNSI )( DOS More Information_
Reviewed by : itle :
Date : 7/0-?.1/9/
FORM: ERC-06
A{;
d
billy rt_ strite
architect p.a. a.;.a.
2:1
February 3, 1984
M(
CITY
j Rf.INT 1.5
ON
City of Renton l11200MillAvenue, South
FEB 61984Renton, Washington 98055
Attn: Planning & Zoning Staff BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
Jeanette Samek
Dear Jeanette: Re: Penta Building
Pursuant to our conversation, we are submitting a supplemental
site plan that addresses the three concerns raised yesterday.
Item #1 - Driving aisles to be minimum 24 ' -0" wide - minimum
20 ' -0" deep spaces:
Please note #1 on plan - the site depth will accomodate
24 ' wide driving aisles.
We have also shown 20 ' -0" deep spaces, however, we do
not subscribe to this criteria. Our original proposal
allows for 20 ' deep spaces by placing the landscape
bumper in the place of the standard precast concrete
wheel stop. This provides considerable ease in
cleaning and allows greater landscape amenity.
Item #2 - Raymond Avenue access to close to intersection:
Please note #2 on plan - we feel that our original
proposal far outweighs this acceptable solution,
and note that since Raymond dead ends to the north
and only extends a block to the south, that the 50 '
criteria far exceeds the possible traffic generated.
Also, our engineer informs us that the standard road
section is 34 ' B/B. This leaves an additional 16 '
to the property line and thus gives us adequate
turning movement with the curb cut as proposed.
Item #3 - Storm Drainage:
We have shown the latest existing storm drains as
given us by our engineers. See #3 on Plan.
Our plan here is to utilize the existing catch basin
in the recently improved alley at our southeast corner,
twenty six sixty grocer court • bohse, Idaho 83705 • (208)336.8370
City of Renton
February 3, 1984
Page z.
along with the existing catch basin in our southwest
corner and a new catch basin in the upper parking
area thzt will dra-n to the existing catch basin
at the corner of Grady Way and Raymond Avenue.
We tiould appreciate your review of our latest submittal along
wits a re-evaluation of the original application.
We feel strongly about green areas and would hope that our concept
fines favor. We also think the double access will lessen the Grady
Way impact and should be given positive consideration.
Since timing is so very critical , we are prepared to live with
our supplemental plan and trust this will meet with your total
approval .
You have been most helpful. 0
ectfully,
rite
BRS: cw
cc: Russell Corp. 00°`''
Dave Kilbourn
Enc7.s. - 3 copies supplemental site plan
pF R4,
jv
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR
09 sumpMUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540
0 P
gT
Q SEPSEc0
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
February 2. 1984
Mr. Dave Kilbom
4105 East Edgewater Drive #167
Seattle, WA 98112
RE: Frederick J. Steiner Rezone
File: R-008-84; ECF-006-84
Dear Mr. Kilburn:
On January 25. 1984, the Renton Environmental Review Committee met to discuss the
above referenced rezone application. In the course of our review, it was decided that
some revision would be necessary with the site plan for the proposed PentaBuildingbeforetheCommitteewillissueanenvironmentaldeclaration. Specifically, items
needing revision or more information are as follows:
1. Parking
The parking stalls shown on the site plan do not meet the standards of the city's
parking and loading ordinance. The dimensions shown on the plan are 17 feet by 9
feet. The correct stall length should be 20 feet and have a width of 9 feet. If
space is tight. compact stalls could be utilized. Twenty-five percent of the
required parking can be designated as such and have a dimension size of 16 feet by
8 feet.
The aisle width shown for the parking is also undersized. Ninety degree head-in
parking requires a backup space of 24 feet. not 22 feet as is designated on the site
plan.
2.Driveway Location
The western access point off Raymond Avenue S.W. will have to be redesigned.
The driveway shown is located too close to the intersection of Raymond Avenue
and Grady Way. The Traffic Engineering Division has informed the committee that
the "driveway must be set back a minimum of fifty (50) feet from the north
property line.
Mr. Dave Kilbom
February 2, 1984
Page 2
3. Storm Drainage
How is the storm drainage on the site going to be handled? Positive drainage is
required. The Engineering Division has requested that a detailed storm drainage
plan be provided, including retention/detention.
Please submit at least three copies of this requested information to the Building and
Zoning Department at your earliest convenience so that an environmental declaration can
be math for the requested rezone. Until this is accomplished, the application will remain
on our i.genda under pending business.
For the Environmental Review Committee:
Roger J. Blaylock
Zoning Administrator
RJB:JFL:se
0652Z
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
AGENDA
JANUARY 25, 1984
PAGE 2
ECF-006-84 FREDERICK J. STIENER
R-008-84 Application to rezone 0.8 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 to
allow the construction of a two story office building having 17,500
square foot; located on the south side of S.W. Grady Way between
Seneca Avenue S.W. and Raymond Avenue S.W. at approximately
the 700 block.
INFORMATION:
KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
A determination of non-significance has been given to Schneider
Homes, Inc. to subdivide 26.5 acres into 47 single family lots (Park
Ridge East, file 284-22); located between S.E. 196th Street (if
extended west) and S.E. 204th Street, generally between 102nd and
104th Avenues S.E. (if both were extended). Any comments are
due by February 7, 1984.
KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
A determination of non-significance has been given to Teter
Construction, Inc., to subdivide 5.44 acres into 24 single family lots
Eaglebrook, file 284-23); located on the north side of S.E. 192nd
Street extending north to S.E. 190th Street (if extended) and
between 104th Avenue S.E. and 105th Avenue S.E. (if both were
extended). Any comments are due by February 7, 1984.
KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
A determination of non-significance has been given to Pacific
Western Investments, Inc., to subdivide 37.3 acres into 92 single
family lots (Lake Washington Ridge South, file 284-7); located
between 116th Avenue S.E. and 124th Avenue S.E. (if extended) and
between S.E. 78th and S.E. 80th Streets (if both were extended).
Any comments are due by February 7, 1984.
CirY OF icEN ON
billy ray strite
architect p.a. a.i.a.
nJAN1 1984
ut .c.;iNui4Uid.NG OZr-
January 12, 1984
City of Renton
Building & Zoning Department
Municipal Building
200 Mill Avenue, South
Renton, Washington 98055
Attn: Land Use Hearing Officer
Re: Rezone Request
The applicant is respectfully requesting the approval of a
proposed rezone from R-1 to B-1 and gives the following supporting
evidence of it' s appropriateness, and it' s proper timing.
The proposal will allow an owner-occupied office structure to
complete the rezone of a block south of Grady Way between
Seneca Street and Raymond Street, just west of the interstate
interchange.
This specific site is located in a transitional area and is
presently zoned R-1 (residential) , as it was in 1976 when the
Green River Valley Plan was adopted (Ordinance #3076) . The
adjacent parcel to the east has most recently been rezoned to
accomodate a similar office use (B-1) . There are similar land
uses located north and west of the subject site.
Recent rezoning trends in the immediate area, coupled with the
pending Grady Way Improvement LID lend to significant and
highly beneficial changes.
The Comprehensive Plan indicates this general area is intended
for light manufacturing/office park uses , and this proposal is
a fitting element.
The Green River Valley Plan encourages such goals as the promotion
of high-quality development, enhancement of the tax base, quality
working environments, and a total commitment to a diversified
economic base; this rezone promotes and encourages these goals
and is intended to minimize detrimental impact.
twenty six sixty grocer court • !poise, Idaho 83705 • (208)336-8370
City of Renton
Building & Zoning Department
January 12, 1984
Page 2
The Comprehensive Plan notes Valley objectives such as land use,
circulation, landscaping open space and design and development.
This proposal is in concert with these objectives and as an
individual site becomes an integrated part of the total Valley
unit. Specific site objectives such as ingress/egress points,
parking and landscaping have been designed to minimize traffic
impacts, maximize open space, and allow for aesthetic compatibility
with the surrounding area.
The applicants are cognizant of the positives available in this
area, and as owner/occupants have specifically hand-picked this
particular site and will strive to produce a facility emblematic
of this progressive area of Renton.
Your positive review and comment will allow this to come to
fruition, and the applicants' look f•rward to your assistance
and to the eventual construction a - move-in.
s• f fully,
7/7 /411
ay e
Repr-,:"en ative
BRS:cw
cc: Frederick Stiener
Thomas McFarlan
Russell Construction
TY OF RENTC I FILE NO(S): ,_ o°B -x,/
w BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT C.r_- ou!, -5'
ru
N.
c
MASTER AppLicATioN
NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those
items related to your specific type of applications) are to be completed.
Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
APPLICANT LTYPE OF APPLICATION
NAME
FEES
Frederick J. Stiener
1j REZONE*(FROM R-1 TO B-1 ) 300. 00
ADDRESS
321 Raineer Ave. , S.
n SPECIAL PERMIT*
0 TEMPORARY PERMIT*
CITY
Renton, WA
98 055
ZIP
J
0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT*
TELEPHONE
1 SITE PLAN APPROVAL
2 0 6-2 2 6-2 7 6 3
C1 GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT
No. of Cubic Yards:
CONTACT PERSON
VARIANCE
From Section:
Justification Required
NAME
Dave Kilborn
1'
ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS:
4105 E. Edgewater Drive #167
0 SHORT PLAT
CITY ZIP 0 TENTATIVE PLAT
Seattle, WA 98112 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT
TELEPHONE 0 FINAL PLAT
206-451-4918
WAIVER
Li
Justification Required)
OWNER NO. OF LOTS:
NAME PLAT NAME:
Frederick Stiener & Thomas McFarlan
ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT:
312 Raineer Ave. , S.0 PRELIMINARY
CITY ZIP 0 FINAL
Renton, WA 98178
P.U.D. NAME:
TELEPHONE
2 0 6-2 2 6-2 7 6 3 0 Residential 0 Industrial
0 Commercial 0 Mixed
LOCATION
MOBILE HOME PARKS:
PROPS_ T
ADDRESS66Block Grady Way S .V,} .
0 TENTATIVE
EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING
t
PRELIMINARY
Vacant R-1 IJ FINAL
PROPOSED USE PARK NAME:
Office Building NUMBER OF SPACES:
B-1 Zoning requiredf1A11RQFNVTDFNTAI pGvTEW M/Tl, TTrC
160 . 00
SQ. FT. ACRES
AREA:
34 , 848 0. 8 I TOTAL FEES 460. 00 I1
1_,_ STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING
UHR•ti
r I APPLiCAT1UN RECEIVED BY:
J A N J 190pp
APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE:
E. Accepted
0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By:
RIJI1.0iNG/ZONING OrPl.,
Initials)
DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY:
1
s 4 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE:
0 Accepted
0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By:
Initials)
ROUTED TO:
ii
a Building la Design Eng. Fire Parks
51 Police Policy Dev. Traffic Eng. Utilities
REVISION 5/1ti82
Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet).
Lots 6 - 16 inclusive, Block 28 , D. C. Hillman ' s Earlinqton
Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle. Vol . 17, Page 74 ,
King County. Washington
AFFIDAVIT
I, . 7:)`A/C) rq TA- c being duly sworn, declare that I am
authorized representative to act for the property owner,[owner of the property involved
in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the
information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS
DAY OF n
19
G
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF
WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT
A. L(247JejOAe _ so
Name of Notary Public)Signature of Owner)
Cidy A\---a//J it!//
Address) Address)
416-7. 11 OUll-Fk/
City) State) (Zip)
Telephone)
Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete
application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in
the "Application Procedure."
1 Fora #174
i
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
CITY OF RENTON
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM D I CO N tl WI F
JAN 13 1984
El
BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Application No. R-- oos4 4/4
Environmental Checklist No. ecp - 004, -y /
PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date:
Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance
ElDeclaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS :
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I . BACKGROUND
I. Name of Proponent FrPderi rk .T_ Si-i en en an& rabGunas McFarlan
2. Address and phone number of Proponent:
321 Raineer Ave. , S.
Renton, WA 98055
206-226-2763
3. Date Checklist submitted
4. Agency requiring Checklist Planning/Zoning
5. Name of proposal , if applicable:
Penta Building
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
Twn—ctnry nff i rya hil l l rl i nn cnntcai ninj—approxi latQ 17-, 500 s. f.
constructed on a precast concrete daylight parking caracJP
with ancillary on-grade parking and landscape, amenities_
2-
7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
mental setting of the proposal ) :
Wooded site on the south side of the 800 block of S. W. Grady
Way, directly adjacent to Renton West Office Building.
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal :
August 1, 1984
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
federal , state and local --including rezones) :
City Rezone
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain:
No
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal ? If yes , explain:
Yes — LID proposal pending
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
See attached rezone application
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures? x
Pam— MAYBE TO-
b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over-
covering of the soil? x
YES MAYBE NO
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
features?
x
YES MAYBE ND
d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
x
YES- MAYBE FIT—
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
either on or off the site?
x
YES RAMIE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?x
YES MAYBE W
Explanation:
c) Grading necessary for daylite parking garage
b) Filling at parking area pile drilling and underground
parking excavation
3-
2) Air. Will the proposal result in:
a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?x
YES MAYBE NO
b) The creation of objectionable odors?
YET- MAYBE 1
c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate, either locally or
regionally? X
YES MAYBE N5
Explanation:
3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of
water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X
YES MAB N5-
b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff? x
YES MAYBE0-
c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? x
YES MAYBE ND-
d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body? X
YET- MAYBE NO
e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters? X
1TE - MAYBE NO
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters . either
through direct additions or withdrawals , or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria.
or other substances into the ground waters?x
Y P—
O ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies? X
YES MAYBE NT-
Explanation:
b) Drainage pattern altered by improvements.
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
a) Change in the diversity of species. or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees, shrubs. grass , crops ,
microflora and aquatic plants)?
X
Y- MAYBE A0
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique. rare or
endangered species of flora? X
PST MAYBE WV
c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
species?
PEr- MAYBE WU-
d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
x
PET- MAYBE Ffir
Explanation:
a) Removal of existing trees and over-growth and construction
of net." i mnrauoments_
4-
5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds , land animals including
reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)?
x
YES MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna? x_
YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area ,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna?
x
YEB M YBE NO
d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? x
FU MAYBE NO
Explanation :
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? x
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare?
YES MAYBE
Explanation:
8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area? x
YES— MAYBE NU—
Explanation:
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? x
YES MAYBE NO
b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
YET— MAYBE N
Explanation:
10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions? x
YET— MAYBE WO--
Explanation:
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population
of an area? x
YEs— MAYBE 0
Explanation:
ars-
5-
12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing?x
Y! RATITE NO
Explanation:
13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
YES- MMAYBE NO
b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand
for new parking?x
YE MAYBE NU—
c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? x
YES MAYBE P
d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods? x
Yt— MMAYBE t—
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? x
YES— MAYBE NO
f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
bicyclists or pedestrians? x
V— MAYBE 0—
Explanation: (a) (b) Parking and TPD increase as a ratio of
office tenants
14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas :
a) Fire protection? x
YES MAYBE WU—
b) Police protection?
x
c) Schools?x
YES MAYBE No
d) Parks or other recreational facilities? x
YES MAYBE NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Other governmental services?
x
YES MMAYbE NO
Explanation: (e) Could result in finalizing proposed LID
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
x
YES— RTYTT Ir
b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of energy?
x
YET— MAYBE AU—
Explanation:
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? x
YES HO
b) Communications systems?
x
YT Favir N
c) Water? x
YES MAYBE NO
6-
d) Sewer or septic tanks? x
V 3 MAYBE
e) Storm water drainage?
YES WEE' Ni—
f) Solid waste and disposal? x
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)? x
Yrs— MAYBE AU—
Explanation:
18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view? x
YES MAYBE
Explanation:
19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
x
YEs— MAYBE
Explanation:
20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building?
Y-€s MAYBE i-
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lac of'full discloure on my part.
Proponent: 2e:2/;:l
signed)
Di; PA -TALC
name pr me
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
ENDING '
OF FILE
FILE TITLE