HomeMy WebLinkAboutAPPROVED_Final Tree Retention Plan - 106th Ave SE_20240304 LAYTON TREE CONSULTING, LLC
It’s all about trees……
PO BOX 572, SNOHOMISH, WA 98291-0572 * 425-220-5711 * bob@laytontreeconsulting.com
FINAL TREE RETENTION PLAN
17018 AND 17022 106th Avenue SE
Renton, WA
Report Prepared by:
Bob Layton
Registered Consulting Arborist #670
Certified Arborist #PN-2714A
March 4, 2024
JDing 06/05/2024
CURRENT PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING
Michael Sippo 06/06/2024
Final Tree Plan – 106th Ave SE Project
Page 2 Layton Tree Consulting LLC March 4, 2024
Table of Contents
Assignment.................................................................................................................................................... 3
Description .................................................................................................................................................... 3
Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 3
Judging Condition...................................................................................................................................... 4
Observations ................................................................................................................................................. 4
Discussion/Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 5
General Tree Protection Guidelines .............................................................................................................. 5
General Tree Protection Measures ............................................................................................................... 6
Tree Density-Tree Replacement ................................................................................................................... 6
Arborist Disclosure Statement ...................................................................................................................... 7
Attachments
Photos, pages 8 - 17
Tree Summary Table – Retained Trees
Tree Plan Maps
North Map
South Map
Final Tree Plan – 106th Ave SE Project
Page 3 Layton Tree Consulting LLC March 4, 2024
Assignment
Layton Tree Consulting, LLC was asked to compile the final tree retention plan for the 11-lot subdivision
project in Renton, located at 17018 and 17022 106th Avenue SE. This is a condition of approval for the
construction permit application per the Hearing Examiners Final Decision report.
My assignment is to assess and report on the trees to be retained at the site, and to provide appropriate
recommendations for the continued protection of retained trees during construction.
Date of Field Examination: March 1, 2024
Description
The final tree retention plan needs to comply with the Hearing Examiners (Preliminary Plat) Final Decision as
follows:
Tree Retention. As conditioned, adequate tree retention and mitigation is achieved. The applicant
submitted a Conceptual Landscape and Tree Retention Plan (Ex. 8). A total of 69 significant trees were
identified on the project site. Of these, 11 trees are located within areas of proposed right-of-way
dedication, which results in 58 remaining significant trees on- site. Based on the City' s retention
requirement of 30 percent, the applicant is required to retain or replace 17 trees on the project site. The
applicant has identified 15 trees as viable for retention. The applicant is therefore required to for the
removal of 2 significant trees through the installation of 12 2- inch caliper trees. The Conceptual
Landscape Plan proposes the planting of 51 3- inch caliper trees, which exceeds the minimum tree
replacement requirements. In addition, each lot includes the minimum two (2) trees required per 5, 000
square feet for compliance with the minimum tree density requirements.
The site has been recently cleared and mass-graded. The majority of utilities have been installed. See
pictures below. There are 20 significant trees remaining at the site. Five of these (Trees #105, #106,
#107, #145 and #146) are not viable for retention. Their health and structural stability have been or will
be compromised by house and/or driveway construction.
15 trees are feasible for retention at the site. These are the subject of this report.
Methodology
Each tree in this report was visited. Tree diameters were measured by tape. Each tree was visually
examined for defects and vigor. The tree assessment procedure involves the examination of many factors:
• The crown or canopy of the tree is examined for current vigor/health by examining the foliage for
appropriate color and density, the vegetative buds for color and size, and the branches for structural
form and annual shoot growth; and the overall presence of limb dieback and/or any disease issues.
• The trunk or main stem of the tree is inspected for decay, which includes cavities, wounds, fruiting
bodies of decay (conks or mushrooms), seams, insect pests, bleeding or exudation of sap, callus
development, broken or dead tops, structural defects and unnatural leans. Structural defects can
include but are not limited to excessive or unnatural leans, crooks, forks with V-shaped crotches,
multiple attachments.
Final Tree Plan – 106th Ave SE Project
Page 4 Layton Tree Consulting LLC March 4, 2024
• The root collar and exposed surface roots are inspected for the presence of decay, insect damage, as
well as if they have been injured or wounded, undermined or exposed, or the original grade has
been altered.
Judging Condition
The three condition categories are described as follows:
Good – free of significant structural defects, no disease concerns, minor pest issues, no significant root
issues, good structure/form with uniform crown or canopy, foliage of normal color and density, average or
normal vigor, will be wind firm if isolated or left as part of a grouping or grove of trees, suitable for its
location
Fair – minor to moderate structural defects not expected to contribute to a failure in near future, no disease
concerns, moderate pest issues, no significant root issues, asymmetric or unbalanced crown or canopy,
average or normal vigor, foliage of normal color, moderate foliage density, will be wind firm if left as part of
a grouping or grove of trees, cannot be isolated, suitable for its location
Poor – major structural defects expected to cause fail in near future, disease or significant pest concerns,
decline due to old age, significant root issues, asymmetric or unbalanced crown or canopy, sparse or
abnormally small foliage, poor vigor, not suitable for its location
The attached Tree Summary Table provides specific information on tree sizes and dripline measurements.
Observations
Trees to be retained are described as follows:
Tree #101 is a semi-mature Douglas fir located in the back, northeast corner of the property. It has
developed good structural form and is of decent vigor. Overall condition is rated as ‘fair-to-good’.
There have been no impacts to the tree to date.
Tree #108 is a semi-mature Western red cedar. It was topped many years ago at roughly 30-feet above
ground. It has developed multiple new tops as a result of the past topping. New tops appear to be
soundly attached. Vigor is good. Foliage is of normal color and density. Condition is ‘fair-to-good’.
There have been no impacts to the tree to date.
Trees #118, #119, #120, #121 and #124 are a grouping of semi-mature Douglas fir in the northwest
corner of the site. All are of good vigor and have developed sound structural form. There has been
some minor ground disturbance north of Tree #120. All are in ‘good’ condition.
Trees #147, #148 and #149 are two semi-mature Douglas fir and an oak located on the east perimeter
adjacent to 106th Avenue SE. These have been recently impacted on all sides by utility installations and
grading. Impacts to date are significant but do not appear to have compromised the structural stability.
These are in ‘fair-to-good’ condition.
Final Tree Plan – 106th Ave SE Project
Page 5 Layton Tree Consulting LLC March 4, 2024
Trees #159 > #162 are a row of four semi-mature Western red cedar. All are of good vigor with foliage
of normal color and density. #159 and #160 were topped many years ago. They have developed
multiple new tops as a result of the past topping. New tops appear to be soundly attached. Condition is
‘fair-to-good’. #161 and #162 are in good condition with no concerning issues. There has been some
minor disturbance to outer north dripline areas where surface roots have been exposed and damaged.
Tree #163 is a young to semi-mature variety of linden. It is comprised of three small-diameter stems
that fork near ground level. Condition is ‘fair-to-good’. There have been no impacts to the tree to date.
Discussion/Recommendations
The 15 trees to be retained at the site are well-positioned for successful preservation and appear
structurally stable at this time. Their stability has not been compromised by the recent removal of trees
from the site. Most will not be significantly impacted by new improvements. The attached tree plan
maps indicate trees to be retained and their driplines. Prior to commencing with home construction,
the tree protection fencing shall be securely positioned around retained trees as shown on the attached
maps.
There have been recent impacts within the driplines of Trees #147, #148 and #149. Utility pipes have
been installed at 8 to 10-feet west of the trunks, and there has been grading within the 8-feet of the
trunks on the east side. The extent of the disturbance is unknown. Tree health shall be periodically
monitored during the construction process. An inspection of tree health and risk is recommended just
prior to the completion of the project.
Other retained trees have not been significantly impacted to date. These can be expected to remain
viable so long as the tree protection guidelines and measures as outlined below are adhered to. There
have been minor disturbances to the outer dripline areas of Tres #162 and #163, which would have been
eventually needed for dispersion trenches. Protection fencing can be positioned inside the driplines as
shown on the attached map.
The stability of Tree #108 will not be adversely affected by the removal of the adjacent cedar trees. The
cut stumps of Trees #105, #106 and #107 shall be grinded down to below grade and not pulled. Pulling
the stumps would cause unnecessary damage to Tree #108 whose roots will be intertwined with these
trees. Maintain as much of the tree canopy on Tree #108 as possible so branches can continue to shade
the lower trunk. Exposing the lower trunk to unfamiliar sun exposure will likely cause sun-scalding and
cambium dieback on the southwest side, which will have a significant impact on future tree health.
General Tree Protection Guidelines
Tree protection fencing shall be positioned around any retained and/or protected trees prior to site
demolition or bringing any heavy equipment onto the site. This will help to define clearing limits and
protect soils and surface roots.
Any roots damaged during site work outside of the tree protection fenced areas shall be pruned clean at
sound tissue prior to backfilling or finishing areas. Sound tissue is where the root is undamaged and the
bark is completely intact with the root. This will help roots to seal off potential decay and allow them to
Final Tree Plan – 106th Ave SE Project
Page 6 Layton Tree Consulting LLC March 4, 2024
sprout new growth. Any disturbed areas near protected trees shall be watered weekly during the dry
season of June through September. This will help to create a favorable environment for new root
growth and reduce the overall stress associated with root loss and disturbance.
Simply finish the landscape within the driplines of retained trees by covering the ground with a 3 to 4-
layer of organic mulch. Maintain the existing grades inside tree protection areas. Keep large plantings,
irrigation trenching and construction of hardscapes outside of tree protection areas. All landscape work
within the tree protection areas shall be completed by hand-labor only.
General Tree Protection Measures
The following guidelines are recommended to ensure that the designated space set aside for the
retained trees is protected and construction impacts are kept to a minimum. Tree Protection Standards
have been set forth under RMC 4-4-130 H. Performance Standards for Land Development/Building
Permits; 10. Protection Measures During Construction. Review this code section prior to the start of
work.
• Tree protection fencing shall be erected per prior to moving any heavy equipment on site. Doing
this will set clearing limits and avoid compaction of soils within root zones of retained trees.
• Excavation limits shall be laid out in paint on the ground to avoid over excavating.
• To establish sub grade for foundations, curbs and pavement sections near the trees, soil should
be removed parallel to the roots and not at 90-degree angles to avoid breaking and tearing
roots that lead back to the trunk within the drip-line. Any roots damaged during these
excavations should be exposed to sound tissue and cut cleanly with a saw.
• Areas excavated within the drip-line of retained trees should be thoroughly irrigated weekly
during dry periods.
• Preparations for final landscaping shall be accomplished by hand within the drip-lines of
retained trees. Large equipment shall be kept outside of the tree protection zones at all times.
Tree Density-Tree Replacement
To my knowledge, the landscape or tree replacement plan for the project has not changed.
The Conceptual Landscape Plan proposes the planting of 51 3- inch caliper trees, which exceeds the
minimum tree replacement requirements. In addition, each lot includes the minimum two (2) trees
required per 5, 000 square feet for compliance with the minimum tree density requirements.
Final Tree Plan – 106th Ave SE Project
Page 7 Layton Tree Consulting LLC March 4, 2024
Arborist Disclosure Statement
Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training and experience to examine
and assess trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees, and attempt to
reduce the risks associated with living near trees. Clients may choose to accept or disregard the
recommendations of the arborist, or to seek additional advice.
Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees
are living organisms that grow, respond to their environment, mature, decline and sometimes fail in
ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground.
Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy and/or safe under all circumstances, or for a
specified period of time. Likewise, remedial treatments, like any medicine, cannot be guaranteed.
Treatment, pruning and removal of trees may involve considerations beyond the scope of the arborist’s
services such as property boundaries, property ownership, site lines, disputes between neighbors, and
other issues. Arborists cannot take such considerations into account unless complete and accurate
information is disclosed to the arborist. An arborist should then be expected to reasonably rely upon
the completeness and accuracy of the information provided.
Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of
risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees
Final Tree Plan – 106th Ave SE Project
Page 8 Layton Tree Consulting LLC March 4, 2024
Photo Documentation
Tree #101 in back NE corner
Tree #101
Final Tree Plan – 106th Ave SE Project
Page 9 Layton Tree Consulting LLC March 4, 2024
Tree #108 on right
Tree #108 on left
Final Tree Plan – 106th Ave SE Project
Page 10 Layton Tree Consulting LLC March 4, 2024
Tree #108 in foreground
Trees #124, #120 and neighboring Tre #206 close to north property line
Final Tree Plan – 106th Ave SE Project
Page 11 Layton Tree Consulting LLC March 4, 2024
Trees #118 > #121
Upper crowns of trees pictured above
Final Tree Plan – 106th Ave SE Project
Page 12 Layton Tree Consulting LLC March 4, 2024
Looking northwest to Trees #118 > #121
Upper crowns of trees pictured above
Final Tree Plan – 106th Ave SE Project
Page 13 Layton Tree Consulting LLC March 4, 2024
Trees #147, #148 and #149
Recent utility work west of tree trunks
Final Tree Plan – 106th Ave SE Project
Page 14 Layton Tree Consulting LLC March 4, 2024
Recent grading work east of tree trunks (Trees #147, #148 and #149)
Upper crowns of trees pictured above
Final Tree Plan – 106th Ave SE Project
Page 15 Layton Tree Consulting LLC March 4, 2024
Looking west down south property line to Trees #159 > #162
Trees #159 > #162
Final Tree Plan – 106th Ave SE Project
Page 16 Layton Tree Consulting LLC March 4, 2024
Trees #159 > #162 on south perimeter
Trees #160 > #162
Final Tree Plan – 106th Ave SE Project
Page 17 Layton Tree Consulting LLC March 4, 2024
Tree #159 and #160, topped many years ago
Tree #163
Layton Tree Consulting LLC
For:Sapphire Homes
Site:10718 106th Avenue SE - Renton
Tree Summary Table
Date:
RETAINED TREES
Tree/DBH Height
Tag #Species (inches)(feet)Condition Comments
N S E W
101 Douglas fir 23 95 10 12 10 16 Fair-Good foliage somewhat sparse
108 Western red cedar 36 75 18 20 12 20 Fair-Good topped in the past at +/-30-feet, multiple new tops
118 Douglas fir 28 110 8 10 12 10 Good good form and vigor
119 Douglas fir 29 120 6 14 10 6 Good good form and vigor
120 Douglas fir 23 90 14 12 10 16 Good good form and vigor
121 Douglas fir 16 80 6 10 12 6 Fair-Good minor crook
124 Douglas fir 31 120 12 8 12 12 Good good form and vigor
147 Douglas fir 30 120 16 8 12 14 Fair-Good recently impacted by utility work
148 Douglas fir 21 105 8 8 10 14 Fair-Good recently impacted by utility work
149 English oak 26 90 6 20 12 18 Fair-Good recently impacted by utility work
159 Western red cedar 20 45 14 12 8 12 Fair-Good topped in the past, multiple new tops
160 Western red cedar 17 50 14 10 10 8 Fair-Good topped in the past, multiple new tops
161 Western red cedar 22 55 12 12 10 10 Good good form and vigor
162 Western red cedar 25 60 12 12 10 6 Good good form and vigor
163 Linden 7,5,4 40 12 10 12 10 Fair-Good stems forked at base/root crown
Dripline measurements from face of trunk
Drip-Line
(feet)
3/1/2024