Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA76-876 MAP BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE SPECIAL PERMIT SP- `€7Co - 7Co To riLL AND GRADE IN 12- eY ZoNE CAN - Al�'l PROPERI"IES 7-//c St47Z• �G pF R• �,� „ ' ° o THE CITY OF RENTON U , MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o (7) CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR o P EPAR':MEg ``' ��3 Q 235 - 2550 o4 O S E P� � /ck, �\��$ j Cs, NN\ up ME MORA NDU 0-1(31 P2f• ,L 1` �ti Januar , 978 TO: Ron Nelson , Building Division FROM: Michael Smith , Planning Department RE : CAN-AM SPECIAL PERMIT NO . SP-876-76 AND ANNUAL LICENSE FOR FILL AND GRADE Pursuant to my on-site field inspection with you and Mr. Jack McCann , grading operator , on January 26 , 1978 , we have no objections to the completion of the project by extension of the annual license for a six week period . The operation shall be subject to all the conditions established in the Planning Commission special permit approval and shall be further limited to only those areas discussed with Mr. McCann ( i . e . , No -encroach- ment into existing vegetation and trees around the entire site shall occur. ) . Upon completion of this work , the site shall be cleaned and final slopes established and rehabilitated ner ordinance requirements . If we can be of any fur- ther assistance , please advise . MLS :wr • G �..o v °4 „ o THE CITY OF RENTON _ `� Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MIL-LAVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 o�A 09 ‘<,Q 235-2550 qT f� SEPt•. MEMORANDUM 0Nais2o2i??4. ? September 8, 1976 A <eN c? e,P off e% ( lb TO: Files d� • FROM: Joan Lankford RE: Can Am Grading Gordon Ericksen and I met with the contractor, Jack McCann, on the site .yesterday, Tuesday,. September 7. The contractor was notified that part of the fifty (50) foot buffer on the north had been eliminated and Would need a screening berm and/or a restored planting buffer. The large evergreen trees that are to remain on the site needed to have the stacked brush and dirt pulled away from their base so they will survive. In addition, the contractor was cautioned that cutting and • filling should be held back from the base of the tree stands and he should preserve the underbrush in that area as well as the trees. • • • • • 000001k_ rn A.?"03. •► ��� o THE CITY OF 1IENTON `S ' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 0 ./3 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR e PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 �� 235-2550 4 D SEP���� August 6 , 1976 Jim Platt Can-Am Properties 60-01 140th Ave . N . E . Suite #257 Redmond , WA 98052 RE : APPROVAL OF SPECIAL PERMIT NO . SP-876-76 FOR FILL AND GRADE _ Dear Mr. Platt : The Renton Planning Commission at its July 28 , 1976 public hearing approved your application for fill and grade with the - following conditions . 1 . Provide 140 foot setbacks on the south and west property lines , or to the existing major tree line , whichever is less . 2 . Specifically locate and preserve the larger evergreen trees along the western portion of the site and off of N . E . 3rd street . 3 . Provide a 50 foot, natural landscaped buffer from N , E . 4th street to protect the adjacent residential area . 4 . Posting of a bond , certified check , or depositing in a special bank account funds sufficient to insure proper hydroseeding that you indicated on your plans . 5 . Drainage control and retention pond will be subject to Public Works Department approval and designated on the final plan . 6 . All flagging operations and traffic control must be approved by the Traffic Engineering Division of the Public Works Department . 7 . The applicant will meet with the Utilities Division prior to grading to determine any potential conflicts with existing utility lines , particularly along the eastern portion of the site . CAN-AM PROPERTIES August 6 , 1976 Page Two 8. Hours of operation shall be from 8 : 00 a . m. to 4 : 30 p . m. on weekdays only. 9 . Any additional excavation and grading shall be subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission and Planning Department . The approval period is for one year with provision for possible extension if necessary . We have discussed the conditions of apprval with Mr. Pat Easter , your representative , on August 2 , 1976 . It was agreed at that time that the approval offered sufficient flexibility for your needs and those of the city . A field trip to the site was also discussed to review more accurately the trees and vegetation that might be retained until more detailed site development plans are prepared . When you are ready to proceed , please inform us of a time that is convenient to you for such a meeting . If you have any further questions , please do not hesitate to contact this department. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning D.ir for f M ' chael L . Smith Associate Planner MLS : bg cc : Patrick Easter r o THE CITY OF RENTON c- MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 2 K` " . •, n mil' °' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI ; MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 0 fD SEP1-�0� MEMORANDUM July 30 , 1976 TO : Tom Touma , Design Engineer FROM: Joan Lankford , Planning Department • RE : STORM DRAINAGE - CAN-AM PROPERTIES Would you please review and comment on the drainage and retention pond plans proposed for Can-Am Properties . Please return the grading plans with your comments . JL : vb Attachments • • RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION . ADMINISTRATIVE MEETING JULY 28, 1976 MINUTES COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT:, Logan Garrison , Sandra Gist , Anthone Mora , Arthur Scholes , Clark Teegarden , Joan Walker : COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: Bylund Wik . CITY OFFICIALS PRESENT: George Perry , Councilman . CITY STAFF PRESENT: Gordon Ericksen , Planning Director ; Willis Roberts , Recording Secretary . • • 1 • CALL TO ORDER: The July administrative meeting of the Renton Planning Commission was called to order at 8 : 05 p .m. by Chairman ' Garrison , who led the Pledge of Allegiance . 2 • ROLL CALL was taken by Secretary Gist. All members responded present with the exception of Scholes ( to arrive later) and Wik (vacation ) . IT WAS THEN ACTION: MOVED BY MOLA, SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN, THAT THE ABSENT MEMBERS BE EXCUSED . MOTION CARRIED. • ? • ' APPROVAL OF MINUTES : . The Chairman called for corrections or additions to the minutes of July 14 , 1976 , public hearing. Commissioner Gist noted that with reference to the application for rezone by Jay E . Holmes , the Planning Commission had indicated that landscaping along Grady Way and Lind Avenue was to be accomplished outside of the existing fence , in the public right-of-way , to form a buffer screen . The Planning Director noted that the applica- tion had been reviewed by the Council on July 26 , 1976 , and that Mr . Holmes has agreed to landscaping outside of the fence and the posting of a certified check to insure installation in the fall . Following further discussion , IT WAS ACTION: MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY MOLA , THAT THE MINUTES • OF JULY 14, 1976 , BE APPROVED TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OF "LANDSCAPING OUTSIDE THE FENCING ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT- OF-WAY. " FOLLOWING THE LAST SENTENCE OF PARAGRAPH 2 ON PAGE 2 . MOTION CARRIED. 4 • ' OLD BUSINESS : SPECIAL PERMIT: . A. CAN-AM PROPERTIES ; Appl . No . SP-876-76 ; Special Permit to Fill and Grade in 'R-4 Zone ; property located between N . E . 4th St . and N . E . 3rd St . immediately south of Windsor Hills Park . The application was opened for consideration by the Chairman and staff comments were invited . Noting the continuation and, referral to Special Studies Committee. for study , the Planning Director reviewed the characteristics of the request , including a- .description of the location , size , zoning , development in the vicinity , and proposal for excavation and grading. He advised 1 Renton Planning Commission Meeting July 28, 1976 Page Two that the site had been visited by the members of the Special Studies Committee , who have a report to present , and that no ' additional input has: been received from the applicant.. The Chairman invited any comment from the applicant i,n addi - tion to those presented at th'e previous meeting . Mr. Jim Platt stated that he had no further comments at this time . Chairman Garrison then invited questions of •the applicant or staff from the Commission . Hearing none , he called for the committee report . Commissioner Mola, Acting Chairman of the Special Studies Committee , reported that the committee had completely walked through the site ; and they are of the opinion that there are items that should be considered before the entire site is excavated and graded . He reviewed those items as follows : . provision for a screening buffer from adjacent uses until such time as a development proposal is submitted ; provision for setbacks on the south , west and north in order to pre- serve existing vegetation for future development consideration ; preservation of the evergreens ; posting of bond for operation and rehabilitation of the site ; drainage control and retention ; traffic control ; location of utilities prior to excavation ; control of any additional excavation and grading ; hours of operation ; and provision for filling of large existing holes . Review of the requirements of the Mining , Excavation and Grading Ordinance was provided by the Planning Director. Comments from the applicant were again invited by the Chair- man . - Jim Plat , 601 - 140th N . E . , Apartment 257 , Renton , noted their desire to see the property developed to its highest and best use and to take advantage of views offered in the most economic and practical manner . He questioned the committee ' s recommendation to provide for filling, of the large existing holes prior to planned excavation and grading , indicating that- it would be accomplished at a later stage in the operation . He stated that it was their hope that the operation would provide a developable site when completed . Discussion followed among the Planning Commissioners relating to impact on the adjacent properties , effect of the buffers and recommended setback dimensions , preservation of evergreens , location of utilities , and hours of operation . Mr . Platt indi - cated that .the setbacks should not be a problem' but, that the engineer would have to study the matter. He also noted their hiring of a landscape architect- land use planner for the project. Comment was invited from the audience by the: Chairman . . Pat Easter, 3016 Benson Road , Renton , noted his association with Mr . Platt and inquired about the bond that was suggested . He was advised by. the Planning Director that the purpose of a bond is 'to assure rehabilitation o.f the site and is based on . a mutual agreement in terms of the rehabilitation that is required to prevent erosion . Mr. Ericksen noted that submittal of a specific development proposal might preclude the need for rehabilitation . In addition , he noted that provision for set- backs could assist in eliminating some of the need for drainage control and rehabilitation . There was discussion among Mr . Easter , ' the Planning Commissioners , and the Planning Director. With ,regard to the recommended .setbacks ; preservation o.f trees , Mining , Excavation and Grading Ordinance requirements., and flexibility of the administration of the con- ditions . Renton Planning Commission. Meeting July 28 , 1976 P.Ige Three Commissioner Scholes arrived at this time , 9 : 00 p . m. Further comment was invited from the audience , but none was offered . IT WAS THEN MOVED BY WALKER , SECONDED BY GIST , THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED . MOTION CARRIED . Following further discussion and deliberation , IT WAS ACTION: MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY MOLA , THAT THE APPLICA- TION BE APPROVED WITH THE CONDITIONS AS STATED IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT AS FOLLOWS: 1 . A PARTIAL PERMIT SHALL BE GRANTED SINCE NO DEVELOP- MENT PLANS ARE PROPOSED AT THIS TIME PROVIDING. A SCREENING BUFFER FROM ADJACENT USES . AT SUCH TIME THAT DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED, THE REMAINING PORTION MAY BE INCLUDED, SINCE LIMITED GRADING IS PROPOSED IN THE PRESENT REQUEST. A DECLARATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANT IMPACT WILL BE SUBMITTED ON THE BASIS OF THE PARTIAL PERMIT. (MORE EXTENSIVE GRADING WOULD COMPLETELY DENUDE THE SITE AND COULD HAVE SIGNIFICANT IMPACT. ) 2 . PROVIDE 140 ' SETBACKS ON THE SOUTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINES OR TO THE EXISTING MAJOR TREELINE, WHICHEVER IS LESS, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN ORDER TO PRESERVE EXISTING VEGETATION BUFFER FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATION. 3. SPECIFICALLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE THE LARGE STAND OF EVERGREENS OFF OF N.E. 3RD STREET. 4 . PROVIDE A 50 ' NATURAL LANDSCAPED BUFFER FROM N.E. 4TH STREET TO PROTECT ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREA . 5 . POSTING OF BOND FOR OPERATION AND REHABILITATION OF SITE . 6 . DRAINAGE CONTROL AND RETENTION POND WILL BE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL AND DESIGNATED ON THE FINAL GRADING PLAN. 7. ALL FLAGGING OPERATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL MUST BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 8 . THAT THE APPLICANT MEET WITH THE UTILITIES DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF THE WATERLINE ON EDMONDS AVE. N.E. EXTENSION RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ANY OTHER UTILITIES THAT COULD CREATE A PROBLEM UPON EXCAVATING PRIOR TO GRADING . 9 . LARGE EXISTING EVERGREENS ON SITE TO BE PRESERVED. 10. ANY ADDITIONAL EXCAVATION AND GRADING SHALL BE SUB- JECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING COM- • MISSION AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. 11 . THE GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN THE ONE YEAR PERMIT TIME AND THE HOURS OF OPERATION SHALL BE LIMITED BETWEEN 8 : 00 A .M. AND 4 : 30 P.M . , MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY. 12 . ALL EXISTING LARGE EXCAVATIONS TO BE FILLED. MOTION CARRIED. 1i II• ' 4 Renton Planning Commission Meeting July 28 ,. 1976 Page Four - I 5• ADMINISTRATIVE: COUNCIL REFERRALS : A. REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - RIPLEY LANE AREA NORTH OF MISTY COVE APARTMENTS The Chairman assigned this referral to the Land Use Com- mittee for study and report back to the Commission-as-a- Whole . B. REAL ESTATE ONE REQUEST REGARDING MULTIPLE DWELLING PARKING II Staff review was invited by the Chairman . The Planning Director advised that a request had been received from Real Estate One , 10500 Carr Road , for review of the present parking and landscaping requirements -for multiple dwell - ings . It has been studied by the Council Planning and Development Committee , and it is their recommendation that no changes be made at this time but that the matter be referred to •the Planning Commission for consideration in their review of the new Zoning Ordinance . Chairman Garri - son assigned the matter to the Land Use Committee with the concurrence of Commissioner Teegarden , Chairman of the Land Use Committee . C. VICTORIA PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION REQUEST REGARDING ACCESS Staff review was requested by the Chairman . The Planning Director noted that a second access to Victoria Park at the time that the remainder of the subdivision is platted has been requested by the Victoria Homeowners Association . It was decided that rather than referral to a committee , the matter would be held in abeyance until further infor- mation is available to the staff regarding future develop- ment in the area , when it will again be presented for Planning Commission review. D. L-1 ZONE EAST SIDE OF BURNETT. AVE . S . , SOUTH OF V. F .W. HALL - REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Chairman reminded the Commission that this matter had been considered at the previous Planning Commission meeting in conjunction with their review of the John C . Corwin rezone and invited staff comment . Mr . Ericksen reported that the Council had also reviewed the conflict of the zoning with the Comprehensive Plan in the subject area and has requested Planning Commission consideration . Noting that the matter had been tabled at the last meeting , IT WAS ACTION: MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY WALKER, THAT WE TAKE THE • MATTER FROM THE TABLE AND REFER IT TO THE SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND RECOMMENDATION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. E. COMMITTEE REPORTS ,I The Chairman called for committee reports . 1 . LAND USE COMMITTEE Commissioner Teegarden , Chairman , advised that the next committee meeting will be held on August 18th . 1 He apprised the Commission of their progress regarding 1 ill it RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT JULY 28, 1976 APPLICANT: CAN-AM PROPERTIES APPLICATION : SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE-R-4 , NO . SP-876-76 LOCATION : Property between , N . E . 4th Street and N . E . 3rd Street , immediately south of Windsor Hills Park . COMMENTS : 1 . The site consists of approximately 8 acres with sand and gravel humps along the eastern and northern portion of the site . Mature stands of evergreens exist along the western portion of the site in the vicinity of the Puget Sound Powerline right-of-way , and a large stand is located in the central portion off of N .E . 3rd Street . Mixed brush exists on the remaining portion of the site . 2 . Windsor Hills Park and residential area are directly to the north , Puget Sound Powerline R/W borders the western boundry , the Washing- ton State Equipment Storage is located on the eastern property line , and a gravel pit opera- tion exists south of N .E . 3rd Street. 3 . N .E . 4th Street is a residential collector arterial and N . E . 3rd Street is a city major arterial . 4 . The ordinance requires proper screening on the periphery of the site . 5 . Graded areas to be hydroseeded for erosion control . 6 . There is no proposal to extend Edmonds Avenue within the current 6-year plan . DECISION CONSIDERATION : Approval should be subject to the following : 1 . A partial permit shall be granted since no development plans are proposed at this time providing a screening buffer from adjacent uses . At such time that development is pro- posed, the remaining portion may be included , since limited grading is proposed in the present request . A declaration of non- significant impact will be submitted on the the basis of the partial permit (More extensive grading would completely denude the site and could have significant impact. ) 2. Provide 140 ' 'setbacks on the south and west property lines 6r to the existing major tree- d line , whichever is less , subject to the approval of the Planning Department in order to preserve existing vegetation buffer for future development consideration . 3 . Specifically locate and preserve the large stand of evergreens off of N . E. 3rd Street. 4 . Provide a 50 ' natural landscaped buffer from N . E . 4th Street to protect adjacent residen- tial area . 5 . Posting of bond for operation and rehabili - tation of site . • • STAFF REPORT Can-Am Properties July 28 , 1976 • 6 . .Drainage control and retention pond will be subject to Public Works approval and desig- nated on the final grading plan . 7 . . All flagging operations and traffic control . • must be approved in advance by Traffic Engineering Division , Public Works Depart- • ment . . 8. That the applicant meet with the Utilities Division of the Public Works Department to . determine the location of the waterline on • Edmonds Ave . N . E . extension right-of-way and any other utilities that could create a problem upon excavating prior to grading . 9 . Large existing evergreens on site to be preserved . • 10 . Any additional excavation and grading shall be subject to review and approval of the • Planning Commission and the Planning Depart- " ment . • 11 . The grading shall be completed within the one year permit time. and the hours of opera- • • tion shall be limited between 8: 00 a .m . and • 4: 30 p .m. , Monday through Friday . • • • • • • • • • : : _.... - gdb/ A7/7/' - 37d's OM - - _ _ - _— _- . /110/1 V_Ii .W/OPS/NO/LA&.zYcY „e - I ,1 L/d Mt/ ' Ol lerai ' v1 Pdo7S -- 9. -17'N/V'C/ #Y O1S - , - _ .. - -- ...---- N117d1 .N/U1V c'/Y ,, / -"Sid Cr s �1 d'.��O�c/ /y..//Y� , o.,' 0/7os/Ai 2-3cM1 -errs rig/- % �0. (1 .- . \kle,‘. 0 .61 . . \ 3 �, - e PE'ri "- 4--/-tf- -IN- E -- / . / - \\ • / / war- i, _ . • . \ t� S1 N tor-- O II • _ .. \ - \ , \ T .\ N.% \\ 0� �' . . = ' •. Q, et .cs, ... _................ . . , _ . _. ,....e.a. _. _ . .._ ._... ____ _ ___ ___ ______ -- _ _ ^..*.;:'+? ,L.::93i,r,,,^a•.lfl"r•_' arS._..._n.,-,,.^..uw:U'^":.tm-�....'t ',. V;u..,Yule......,,.i.`..:.l.t".L..^+',TS1H S e:`".s.r-r'r...r...�. .."..�,y�-rm +'IT+eu rLS•'nt:r•:u.^.•.]{-'l C4� And Iq .-a crstt ». • . r ,, RM, . _,.,......y,-:/- ;�61 , M ,. —�-�`}'"� ( ' FyVC ) J Syr \ , '� _, .�• • n',d ¶:L( Vi 1 •I• ,i~ t i. .�._, _ 1•� I N1R ��,},1Y e. • ill 3 "°`E _ ji .`,` ,'"��• +'� .. •1.nI ', '1: N a yin.t (' Vi N ��• .'� •7' pit t ••o • I 4 :d3 1 1 • ) o l • Iii I JNDRv (0 a t ✓�• .••,• . . • ,X 11 CAN-AM PROPERTIES ar,' " I 1 .4 �i SPECIAL PERMIT ;' I 'I. : y� { ' )� zo 4\�xLl y4 I I � j . a ! f I$$ " , • LEI r j a.;e a .re r. X„ "'1\ r♦.'` say ;g ;.� I r. ns' j!' + F 'r. .•♦•. G� a 9. a- • L E- • sf 3 / '\ s` 'k' a ,.ash ` «o.o.�•o•.o��•AM•�•�• .r..0•o•o.�...••al.o.o•o F o l / / , �/ yGS. ,. , Yv,/ �� ��, ... s,»-µ I,. ., _ II I/11( " 0111— /1 r® ' 1 • o o �• 01 .0•�•0•�•o•� e••a� / • • I 1 • •� • • . • • .. • .o•o. •at � — 1 I 'q/ RENTON •CITY LIMITS 1 _ 1 I///' / \�ti 1 I \ � r. .0 1 I, , ' CI—I a SPECIAL PERMIT : CAN-AM PROPERTIES ; Appl . No . SP-876-76 ; Special Permit to Fill and Grade in R-4 lone ; property located between N . E , 4th St , and N . E . 3rd St . immediately south of Windsor Hills Park , • APPLICANT CAN-AM PROPERTIES TOTAL AREA ±8 . 6 Acres • PRINCIPAL ACCESS N . E . 4th St . EX? SLING ZONING R-4 f • EXISTING USE Undeveloped Property PROPOSED USE Excavation and aradina for drissihle future devQ1o'pmPnt . • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN High Density M, tiple-Family • COMMENTS Applicant proposes to excavate ._ -,..!'._!..'ntl.'" ards of material I . from site and regrade. No plans for reuse have been submitted . . • 1 ! i , I PROPOSED/FINAL :_ LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/ N-SIGNIFICANCE • Application No . SP-876-76/ECF 158-76 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF 158-76 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Partial fill and grading of approximately 8 acres , minus 140 ' setback from the west and south property line and 50 ' setback from the northerly line , to provide screening buffer . ( over) Proponent CAN-AM PROPERTIES Location of Proposal Between N .E . 3rd Street and N . E . 4th Street, directly south of Windsor HiTls Park , Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal—has been determined to Q have ❑X not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is [pis not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : A 140 ' setback from the west and south property lines and 50 ' setback from the north property lines has been proposed to preserve a screening buffer from adjacent uses and preserve stands of large trees . A retention pond will control surface runoff . Traffic control will be provided during operation and meet city standards . Hydroseeding will be provided on graded areas . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Planning i rector �, Date 7 7,g 7 Signature / Agf City of Renton Planning Department 45 ,000 c .y . of material will be removed from a variety of man-made terrains in hill formations . The intent of the project is to: main- tam a level grade from 3rd Avenue to 4th in preparation for future development . J Subject MESSAGE: `. C Dote /1 /L • JUL 2919 //1GDES * RedifPrm 4$ 468 Signecil NO REPLY NECESSARY =REPLY RE UES7ED—USE REVERSE SIDE - t o iiip. I F M : 30 , • ot.. _i,. , ss. , .7,0\\ 3., (77R) • ............... 0 1 ,--� VI 1`(TS k 1' / - -- .. i 06/ ft Il . \1/4 : - / . N � /, �O/�/ �Ls 37. 3; P c�T• L Eve N 011 116. 7\ _ . Na TES itts l I) CATCfd ,5A /.t/- TYP Z A►ISO W GI0 v. CAN AM PRO/06-er/es Z FiFe- is"CAeio - _. .: ci �i�/-I1.3//t/ PLAN _.. .. 01 : : scoP6 To o,Pa/isr STORO /��.e mei 6'6 To R/wA/TCN _a__ . 11 RETE . M"/oN/SED/retENTA T/oAl - - " 4 "o,�F/ce Z . oNr)s _ _ No SCAGr - UG-3/ !776;� Renton Planning Commission Meeting July 14 , 1976 Page Four The Chairman invited comment from the audience , but none was offered. Following further discussion and deliberation , IT WAS ACTION: MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY MOLA, TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND REFER THE MATTER FOR STUDY TO THE SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE FOR REPORT BACK AT THE SEPTEMBER 8TH PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION CARRIED. SPECIAL PERMIT: C. CAN-AM PROPERTIES ; Appl . No . SP-876-76 ; Special Permit to Fill and Grade in R-4 Zone ; property located between N . E . 4th St . and N . E. 3rd St. immediately south of Windsor Hills Park . A review of the application by the staff was requested by the Chairman . Associate Planner Smith displayed maps and excavation , filling and grading plans , noting the property location , zoning, development in the vicinity , size and character of the site , and proposals for grading . Slides and aerial photographs of the area were viewed . Chairman Garrison invited a presentation from the applicant . Jim Platt , 6001 - 140th N . E . , Redmond , representating the • applicant, advised the Commission of previous use of the site which had created mounds of sand that required removal and grading . He stated that while an architect had made a recom- mendation regarding site development , there were no specific plans at present. He responded to queries by the Commis- sioners regarding preservation of natural vegetation and plans for movement and removal of material . Mr. Platt advised the Commission regarding their response to staff inquiries relating to time limits , proposed date of opera- tion , proposed drainage facilities , the amount of fill , traffic , noise and future plans for the property . He stated they are anxious to begin operations prior to the rainey season in anticipation of construction in the spring . Discussion among the Commissioners ensued relating to environ- mental impact. Noting no further questions of the staff, the Chairman called ' for comments in favor or opposition from the audience , but none were received . IT WAS THEN ACTION: MOVED BY WIK, SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN, THAT THE MATTER BE REFERRED TO THE SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND REPORT BACK ON JULY 28, 1976 . Discussion followed regarding the feasibility of the report back date . On the question - MOTION CARRIED. FINAL PLAT: D. ISLE AND LAKE ADDT ' N NO. 2 . ; Appl . No . .FP-875-76 ; Final Plat Application for a Seven Lot Single Family Subdivi - sion ; property located on the north side of N . 38th St, between Lake Washington Blvd . N . and Park Ave . N . ,The. item was opened for consideration by the Chairman . Renton Planning Commission Meeting July 14, 1976 Page Three the entire block and projected growth of the area . It was suggested that the matter be studied by committee relative to the conflict of the L- 1 zoning with. the Com- prehensive Plan . Comments from the audience were called for by the Chair- man , but none were offered . IT WAS THEN MOVED BY WALKER , SECONDED BY GIST, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED . MOTION CARRIED. Following further discussion , IT WAS ACTION: MOVED BY WALKER, SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REZONE REQUEST FROM L-1 TO R-3 TO THE CITY COUNCIL AS IT IS IN AGREEMENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND WOULD BE MORE COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING AND FUTURE USES IN THE AREA . MOTION CARRIED. - I The applicant was advised that a recommendation for approval would be forwarded to the City Council . Further discussion ensued regarding the inappropriateness of the L-1 zoning for the area . IT WAS ACTION: MOVED BY MOLA, SECONDED BY GIST, THAT THE MATTER OF CHANGING THE L-1 ZONING FOR THE AREA TO R-3 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BE REFERRED TO THE LAND USE • COMMITTEE, FOR STUDY. The matter of the proper committee for referral was con- sidered , and IT WAS MOVED BY WALKER , SECONDED BY WIK, THAT - WE TABLE THIS MOTION FOR CONSIDERATION AFTER THE PUBLIC HEARING . MOTION CARRIED . A recess was declared at 9 : 10 p. m. The meeting was resumed at 9 : 20 p . m. with all members noted above in attendance . The Chairman requested that .the staff introduce -the next item of business . I SPECIAL PERMIT: B. PUGET WESTERN ; Appl . No , SP-874-76 ; Special • Permit to Fill and Grade in L- 1 Zone ; property located north and south of S . W. Grady Way east of Springbrook Creek . - Associate Planner Smith described the request to fill and grade , noting the location , size and character of the site , its zoning , and relationship to the proposed P-1 Channel and Springbrook Creek and the requirements of the Shoreline Management Act . Topographical maps and filling and grading plans were reviewed . Maps , slides , and aerial photographs of the area were viewed and explained . The Chairman called for comment from the applicant . Gary ! � Mix , representing Puget Western , Bellevue , offered to respond to questions . Mr. Mix then replied to inquiries concerning provisions of the Shoreline Management Act as they affect their property , the relationship of the site to the proposed P- 1 Channel , plans for fill , drainage , and development of the parcel , potential traffic problems during the filling operation , and the means of access . nl z RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT JULY 14 , 1976 APPLICANT : PUGET WESTERN , INC. APPLICATION : SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN AN L-1 ZONE , APPLICATION NO. SP-874-76 ; property located north and south of S . W. Grady Way ±500 ' west of Powell Ave . S . W. COMMENTS : 1 . The applicant requests to fill his property with ±30 ,000 cu . yds . of fill . 2 . The applicant has no specific reuse plans at this time . 3 . Access to this site ( now and in the future) could have severe traffic impacts . 4 . A Shoreline Substantial Development Permit is currently being processed . DECISION CONSIDERATIONS : Continuance and referral to committee for further study . APPLICANT: CAN-AM PROPERTIES APPLICATION : SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN AN R-4 ZONE , APPLICATION NO . SP-876-76 ; property located between N . E . 4th St. and N . E . 3rd St. immediately south of Windsor Hills Park . COMMENTS : 1 . Applicant requests special permit to remove ±45 ,000 cu . yds . of material . 2 . Applicant has no specific reuse plans at this time . 3 . The environmental impact determination has not yet been made . DECISION CONSIDERATIONS : Continuance and referral to committee for further study . APPLICANT : ISLE AND LAKE ADDITION NO. 2 APPLICATION : FINAL PLAT APPLICATION FOR A SEVEN LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION , APPLICATION NO . FP-875-76 ; property located on the north side of N . 38th St. between Lake Washington Blvd . W. and Park Ave . N . COMMENTS : 1 . The proposed Final Plat is in conformance with the approved Preliminary Plat for this property . The Isle and Lake Additional Preliminary Plat was approved on July 8 , 1975 . Renton Planning Commission Meeting July 14 , 1976 Page Four The Chairman invite'd comment from the audience , but none was offered. Following further discussion and deliberation , IT WAS • ACTION: MOVED BY TEEGARDEN-, SECONDED BY MOLA, TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND REFER THE MATTER FOR STUDY TQ THE SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE FOR REPORT BACK AT THE SEPTEMBER 8TH PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION CARRIED. SPECIAL PERMIT: C, CAN-AM PROPERTIES ; Appl . No . SP-876-76 ; Special Permit to Fill and Grade in R-4 Zone ; property located between N . E . 4th St . and N . E. 3rd St. immediately south of Windsor Hills Park . A review of the application by the staff was requested by the Chairman . Associate Planner Smith displayed maps and excavation , filling and grading plans , noting the property location , zoning, development in the vicinity , size and character of the site , and proposals for grading . Slides and aerial photographs of the area were viewed. Chairman ' Garrison invited a presentation from the applicant . Jim Platt , 6001 - 140th N . E . , Redmond , representating the • applicant, advised the Commission of previous use of the site . which had created mounds of sand that ,required removal and grading . He stated that while an architect had made a recom.- mendation regarding site development, there were no specific plans at present. He responded to queries by the Commis- sioners regarding preservation of natural vegetation and plans for movement and removal of material . Mr. Platt advised the Commission regarding their response to staff inquiries relating to time limits , proposed date of opera- - • tion , proposed drainage facilities , the amount of fill , traffic , noise and future plans for the property . He stated they are anxious to begin operations prior, to the rainey season in anticipation of construction in the spring. • Discussion among the Commissioners ensued relating to environ— mental impact. Noting no further questions of the staff , the Chairman called for comments in favor or opposition from the audience , but none were received. IT WAS THEN . ACTION: MOVED BY WIK, SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN, THAT THE MATTER BE REFERRED TO THE SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND REPORT BACK ON JULY. 28, 1976. Discussion followed regarding the feasibility of the report back date. On the question '- MOTION CARRIED. • FI-NAL PLAT: D, ISLE . AND LAKE ADDT' N NO. 2 . ; Appl . No . F,P-875-76 ; Final Plat Application for a Seven Lot Single Family •Subdivi - sion ; property located on the north side of N . 38th St. between Lake Washington Blvd . N . and Park Ave . N . The item was opened for consideration by the Chairman ., N . f Renton Planning Commission Meeting July 14, 1976 Page Three the entire block and projected growth of the area . It was suggested that the matter be studied by committee relative .to the conflict of the L- 1 zoning with the Com- prehensive Plan . Comments from the audience were called for by the Chair- man , but none were offered . IT WAS THEN MOVED BY WALKER , SECONDED BY GIST , THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. MOTION CARRIED. Following further discussion , IT WAS ACTION: MOVED BY WALKER, SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REZONE REQUEST FROM L-1 TO R-3 TO THE CITY COUNCIL AS IT IS IN AGREEMENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND WOULD BE MORE COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING AND FUTURE USES IN THE AREA . MOTION CARRIED. The applicant was advised that a recommendation for approval would be forwarded to the City Council . Further discussion ensued regarding the inappropriateness of the L-1 zoning for the area . IT WAS ACTION: MOVED BY MOLA, SECONDED BY GIST, THAT THE MATTER OF CHANGING THE L-1 ZONING FOR THE AREA TO R-3 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BE REFERRED TO THE LAND USE COMMITTEE FOR STUDY. The matter of the proper committee for referral was con- _ sidered , and IT WAS MOVED BY WALKER, SECONDED BY WIK, THAT 1 WE TABLE THIS MOTION FOR CONSIDERATION AFTER THE PUBLIC HEARING . MOTION CARRIED . A recess was declared at 9 : 10 p . m. The meeting was resumed , at 9 : 20 p . m. with all members noted above in attendance . The Chairman requested that the staff introduce the next item of business . SPECIAL PERMIT: B. PUGET WESTERN ; Appl . No . SP-874-76 ; Special Permit to Fill and Grade in L-1 Zone ; property located; north and. south of S . W. Grady Way east of Springbrook Creek . Associate Planner Smith described the request to fill and grade , noting the location , size and character of the site , its zoning , and relationship to the proposed P-1 Channel and Springbrook Creek and the- requirements of the Shoreline Management Act . Topographical maps and filling •and' grading .plans were reviewed . Maps , slides , and aerial photographs of the area were viewed and explained . The, Chairman called for comment from the applicant. Gary Mix , representing Puget Western , Bellevue , offered to respond. to questions . Mr . Mix then replied to inquiries concerning provisions of the Shoreline Management Act as they affect their property , the relationship of the site • to the proposed P- 1 Channel , plans for fill , drainage , and development of the parcel , potential traffic problems during the filling operation , and the means of access . Ij July 14, 1976 Mr. Mike Smith, Associate Planner ! City of Renton, Planning Department;` 200 Mills Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Smith: We have received your letter dated July 13, 1976 requesting additional information on our request for a special permit--even though we have complied with all the provisions of the city mining and grading ordinance . We hope the additional information you have requested will further clarify the intention of our project. 1 . As you are aware, the permit is for a one year period of time. It would be our intention to begin the grading and excavation process immedi— ately upon the issuance of the necessary permit, and will be completed within the time duration of the permit period. 2. At this time we do not have a specific date for further development of this property. The ultimate development will conform to the cities existing zoning and land use plans. It is essential that this property be- graded in order to properly accommodate any further development. There ' are substantial areas that must be filled to accommodate the further improvements . The fill area will require either a pre—load for a period of time for the earth to stabilize prior to development. It is therefore essential that this process be undertaken as soon as possible as any development can be started within the next two years. It would be possible to accomplish the grading and excavation as part of the actual develop— ment, however, because of the length of that process it could unduly delay the actual construction. 3. We are presently negotiating with a contractor for grading our property and removing the excess material. He has indicated that he plans to deliver the material to sites outside the city limits of Renton that have been approved by the responsible governing agencies.///r15 • PECFIVED J U L 1 a 1976 9 � 2��ivG DEPP - r=� s Mr. Mike Smith Page 2 4. At the present time there is no existing drainage facilities. The new grading plan will provide a retention pond that will control the surface run-off, which will be nonexistent because of the existing soil condition, ie (98% sand) . 5. We as property owners could eliminate all vegetation prior to making this application without approval from any governmental agencies , however, this was not done since it is our intention to preserve the evergreens adjacent to the powerline right-of-way, which will be used as a buffer for further development. Existing vegetation is basically scotchbroom and scrub growth that will repropagate itself within a few years . It is not our intention to provide screening and fencing at this time since finished grade will be an improvement. It will eliminate irregular topography presently utilized by trespassers for ' motorcycling and used for other multi-terrain vehicles. 6. Because of the minimum amount of fill material to be removed from the property the anticipated truck traffic will be light and will probably not exceed four trips per hour. 7. Access to and from the site will be from the 3rd Avenue extention, a major arterial presently utilized by the adjacent properties for major excavation and filling operations . The traffic generated from our proposed operation will have little or no impact upon the surrounding community and minimul effect on the existing streets and traffic pattern. The contractor will provide flagmen and other operational and safety controls that may be required by the Traffic Division of the Public Works Department. The contractor will not utilize any residential streets for the delivery of excess materials. 8. The property is isolated and removed by considerable distance from ' any residential neighborhoods or developments. Any noise generated from this use would be no different from present uses of the adjacent properties. We hope that the response we have provided to your letter will enable the Planning Department and Planning Commission to act favorably upon our request. We feel that this phase of our proposed development must be completed before the rainy season, as a delay in time will result in additional costs. ' S9ic rely, Jim Platt CAN-AM PROPERTIES f RECEllitb % JP/dm cc: Gorden Y. Ericksen ,® N u DES' ,, PUBLIC NOTICE i PUBLIC HARING CITY OF RENTON I ' PLANNING COMMISSION A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JULY 14, 1976 - 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER THE ITEM 1 ' DESCRIBED BELOW: • '.I SPECIAL PERMIT : CAN-AM PROPERTIES; Appl . No . SP-876-76 ; Special Permit to Fill and Grade in R-4 Zone ; property located between N . E . 4th St . and N . E'.' 3rd St. immediately south of Windsor Hills Park. i i 4!--.1.1.41,i;opoi ; TIT:\ owl \) : [),_.]:II ;....-_, •of e. \\ vi`'f • L r. ,;1- ! ;11• A M N. AO. gym 9* .: .� • t 1 N„, ,, \\ cl .,* ::,...-- •JJ I � •` 1 �L', ' " I gee _ . .. _� ,: e• ,- • •4• , �, 7. 'h.:,,,kp‹,...)140: cr.: 4 wile! .. \I- ..-a-4'-‘... -it •. . ' I • 1 1't . ', 414._ . .IFIG CAR I ;i '. > .t•.. .• .'.. .. , I • ‘'V.I. '•�' ' s'� I . N. JNDRY Co i// /Y S•j'�® .,.. i 'A;'� %•, ' 1 •' +� • O- �,19 l wal ' i . , 1 S 11° %; 21'�� v I . 1 IV------- - LO { I I . '" 1( ,■ ; ,_ .� . . Lit _� - iT� 111 ��" ` k ION,..,:-�! CAN-AM PROPERTIES 1 - i, I�`A�• ►//��` f - �. *heft1' ice. • SPECIAL PERMIT / I s b_ e �o / / c., \ ! 11:,,,,,--- \,1 % i ,/ i/ f/' B-I Q. St1.1 1 ,/�/ fi/1 * 01---\\%\ tl11 narouvEr I 1 ///el . I / -'3 CEMETERY 1 I` /, % NORTI4 I THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND AND TO EXPRESS OPINIONS OR SUBMIT COMMENTS IN WRITING. ' IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS DESIRED, CONTACT.: , ;CITY OF RENTON - PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 235-2550 MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVE. S. 1 RENTON, WA. 98055 C,fl/" - 1-►Yr) prD10crTle.S Affidavit of Publication • , STATE OF WASHINGTON .COUNTY OF KING ss. 13 :.,n' being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says thatf33 Lk..is the ..C.h.:l.£!'.....l er.1.7 of NOTICE OF PUBLIC:HEARING THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) RENTON PLANNING times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and - COMMISSION has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred :RENTON;,WASHINGTON • to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- ! ` ' A.PUBLIC:HEARING WILL BE paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, HELD BYiTHE RENTON PLAN-,i and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained NING'.COMMISSION'AT ITS REG-'' . . at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton ''ULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the :-CH•A M B E R S:;,,C I T Y HALL Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, •.,RENTON,,,WASHINGTON, ON `JULY'14, 1976, AT 8:00 P.M. TO-i -CONSIDER-THE FOLLOWING,} Washington.That the annexed is aND..'J C.C...CIf...a'1.11 -i.e PETITIONS: 1.REZONE'FROM'G6000 TP :-1, i 'e filed'Nor;R-7434.73; property• ....1Car.ix g.,...PlaI1F2ing....�i.C.ratrift.S..'Sion. -� Pe.ti.t",.iL}X13 .located on=Grady Way So. be- =.tween.Lind and-Seneca S.W.-,-: '2.-REZONE'FROM:L-1'TO R-3,file: as it was published in regular issues(and 4 No R-873-76;property located at not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period - 100 Burnett Ave.S. .. .-SPECIAL PERMITTO FILL AND GRADE IN L I,Zone;`file Ne SR-1 of aria consecutive issues,commencing on the 874'76;property;located north ,:,_'and'south Of S. Grady'Way:_+' 19. :(.�7...,andendingthe . .500'west of Powell Ave.S.W`:; ' 7L{,. dayof e� -4:.APPL"ICATION FOR FINAL PLAT: r, .. T.U'fsf: . - ,;APPROVAL,file No.FP-875-76,•.- propertylocated on the north`side` of Ni38th St. between Lake; day of 19 both dates Washington.Blvd.and Park Ave.,:‘ inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers duringall of said 'S.SPECIAL PERMIT TO FIL'LAND. period. That the full amount of the fee GRADE IN R-4 Zone,file No.SP 876-76;property located between;' charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of el„.65, which ,:N.E.4th St.and.N.E.3rd St..im has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the , :.:mediatelysouth:of-Windsor Hills first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent Park. • insertion. •Legal description of all ap-.:, plications noted above on file,in the 1� Renton Planning Department :: ��t ..... .... s yy •ALL,INTERESTED PERSONS'i � TJ. TO SAID PETITIONS ARE.IN_VITED,-j • - TO'BE PRESENT AT THE PLAN-. O-] .o-L...0 1 ti.rk KING COMMISSION MEETING ON' JULY'14, 1976 AT 8:00-P.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS: Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 day of Sandra Gist,SECRETARY: . RENTON PLANNING AIL:, `•i 19...7G • ' . - COMMISSION, V7.7 �/i /;��i Published in the Renton Record- / 4- ", L; ')& Chronicle July 14, 1976.R3862 _ ' Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, ` residing at Kent, King County. —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. • —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. 4' fil ®popter/is NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON , WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON JULY 14 , 19 76 , AT 8 : 00 P . M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . REZONE FROM G6000 TP : -1 , file No . R-743-73 ; property located 'on Grady Way So . between Lind and Seneca S . W . - 2 . REZONE FROM L-1 TO R-3 , file No. R-873-76 ; property located at 100 Burnett Ave. S . 3 . SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN L-1 Zone, file No . SP-874-76; property located north and south of S . . Grady Way ±500 ' west of Powell Ave. S . W . 4. APPLICATION FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL , file No . FP-875-76 ; property located on the north side of N . 38th St . between Lake Washington Blvd . and Park Ave. N . 5 . SPECI:AL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN R-4 Zone , file No . SP-876-76; property located between N . E . 4th St. and N . E . 3rd St. immediately south of Windsor Hills Park . Legal description of all applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON JULY 14, 1976 AT 8 : 00 P . M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Sandra Gist , SECRETARY PUBLISHED . JULY . 4, 1976 RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION • I , William C . Turner , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , SIGNED404001_0_4! trdweigtus..% on the 30 thday of June 19 76. -- 2 _ i.).� ^r �r -- - -^ -'-- '-_ - - -- ---_ ,--- ------ ----------- --__ , ` � ' - ---- '-------' - '- / ' -- Opt +^ | -- _- ' __-'---- ~ | ^ ^7Z / /. 1.-;:dt;;; I OD i 1 1RiL . I Uf))-R\4'.1.'' .v/'/ , 1 . � e Ci ,a. - 5----g-°/6 . -A- --.r.) 17,/". ', - v I I ?"-7-7/ -i 1 . ii ; _ _. if _ ...../..pw , • 1 .. . 7.e"'"'" Fei-777-1-`'ir. - - 'e747-.'„ . . . . ._ . ._ ___._. _,..P_C- ,M; ")tlep 'i tw 4 _ - ------—------__________—_____ _. .. . • .... „';,..h_.....— . .,,,,,,,,4 zit . ... _ . _ _. ._ . ______________ _,. _.._ ..._ _ ____ .. . . _ „ . . . . . . .___. .. _‘ .. ... _ _ _.,_ .,____ . . . . . . . .. . ...._. . .._.. . _,....____ . . .. _rs O�6 OF Ft A '; o THE CITY OF RENTON •• MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 Z C wiL , ., t`. ° CHARLES J. DELAURENTI a MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT <t- 235-2550 04TeD SEP-C��O July 13 , 1976 Can-Am Properties c/o Mr. Jim Platt 60-01 140th Ave. N.E. Suite 257 Redmond, WA 98052 RE: CAN-AM PROPERTIES SPECIAL PERMIT FOR EXCAVATION, GRADE, AND FILL NO. SP-876-76 Dear Mr. Platt: Upon reviewing the information presented and conducting a site inspection, this department feels that additional information is necessary prior to making a determination of environmental significance pursuant to state law. This includes detailed clarification and explanation of the following items : • 1. What is the anticipated timing of the proposed project, including expected beginning and completion dates? 2 . Provide further clarification on the planned reuse of the site, timing, and relationship to the proposed project. It appears that the proposal could be .accomplished as part of the actual development of the site. 3 . Where will the material be disposed? Is it to be sold off-site? 4. More detailed drainage plans should be pro- vided, especially with regard to the proposed retention pond. 5 . What mitigating measures are proposed to preserve some of the existing larger evergreen trees and vegetation? Will screening and fencing for visual and safety purposes be provided? CAN-AM PROPERTIES JULY 13 , 1976 PAGE TWO 6. How many truck trips per day will be generated by the project? 7. What access is proposed to and from the site, and how will this impact the surrounding community, existing streets , and existing traffic patterns? What type of traffic and operations controls are proposed to reduce possible impacts to the adjacent neighbor- hood and existing traffic flows? 8. Additional information is needed with regard to possible noise impacts of the project. We would appreciate a detailed response to these items as soon as possible to expedite the environmental and planning commission review process. If you have any questions or wish to meet with us , feel free to con- tact this department. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen P1 nni g pirector Michae L. Smith Associate Planner MLS :bkg ^.�=-��N�lashngt�an�-I-r�c•. � oFR�� .► o THE CITY OF RENTON Cy t/ ©` Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 8°; CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT n mu O • pA co 0� �Q- 235-2550 4h. OSEP1- ' MEMORANDUM July 13, 1976 TO: Files FROM: Joan Lankford RE: CAN-AM PROPERTIES-FILL AND GRADE R-4 , NO. SP-876-76 Upon review of the permit application and site inspection, further information should be provided on the following items : 1. What are the proposed plans for reuse of the site and when is this action proposed? 2. During what time period is the excavation to take place and when is work to be completed? 3. How many truck-trips per day will be generated and for how long? • 4 . What type of traffic control is proposed during the excavation period and how will this not con- flict with existing traffic? 5. What type of access is proposed to and from the site and what impact will this have on the surrounding neighborhood? 6. Where will the material be disposed and will it be sold? 7. More detailed drainage plans should be provided, detailing proposed retention pond. 8. What mitigating measures are proposed to preserve some of the larger stands of evergreens and existing vegetation. N ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Finance Department III Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department 8 Building Div. Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) SUBJECT : Review of ECF- ; Application No . : Action Name : Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : BL_ Comments ; /'ln•U J F 1 G lY t).T /)V•'P R C.T' :Z---P--0"P-e-•-• C „.--4‘.2"--e- -c5--e-e----' 7,--/-7 ture of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : -7t/ ',62 Comments : :ei ' 5:: ;--------" / 6: Signature of Dir ctor or uthorze id Representative at 6-76 (OVER) 1 -wREVIEW BY OTHER CITY 'DftPARTMENTS : Department : UI l;- S Diulsidy‘.. Comments : RiDcJ j Signature of Director or A thorized Representative D to j REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department: TRAff/c. Eiv onveERin/ Div. Comments : N� 3/6/V/F/c,gAir .ZM pfcT fia4d s. 7-6-76 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date I 1 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • I . ROUTE SCHEDULE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED Z .- 1 7 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: REZONE MAJOR PLAT SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT - �`� WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE 7 . 3 - `C SIGNATURE OR INITAL DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE BUILDING X 2-/74 -R TRAFFIC ENG . 7-6--7 ' GINEERING ✓ , 7� FIRE HEALTH 410111100 REVIEWER ' S COMMENTS OR APPR VAL ONDI IONS : - &; / „ (A3) P ., - 3 -o?6-- 77,T)C_ PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W . : CITY OF RENTON • APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY File N o : S P- "74C-- 7t Fee � �—D�= 0.43 0 Date Rec'd - Receipt No . got, ,4 /gPpr,✓ea( 7,1.2 /7t APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1 . Name CAN.)- AM PZoP��T\e Phone E353 - 4.92 /v PST" Address (r,c-o l 111-U`�' AVE- t i tE.. 50 1 i Z5`7 (C D wt o ti is `.Ut `805z. 2. Property location L.N , g-eT1..ofc t- C. -5 e.0 A, Q •e p ywo z) 4.-o e -r"►-tom P5 P o),J L- v L 3 . Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) ( A r rc�ct-t�ra> • 4 . Number of acres or sq. ft. �, (o Present zoning R — 4 5. What do you propose to develop on this property? TNE p o e.,c) Ls PR.EL-( i ► ,s�2�-� GP �ra1 �r-, ram_ 905S cs t-(21Z )fir 6. The following information shall be submitted with this application: Scale A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan . . 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' - 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) E . A special permit required by the Renton Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307 . 5 in addition to the above . • 7. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION : o REJ Date approved 65V-btf Date denied Date appealed SUN 28 1906 Appeal action Remarks /9 f'r/ c✓P d eei/I/ e •, J//, ,1 c iy am% 1NG ,psQP Planning Dept . 2-73 revised 1-74 AFFIDAVIT I, J AAArpLATT , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this /4 day of , 197C , Notar Public i and for the State of Was ington, r • + .tPST.1A ( am of Notary Public) ' (S1gnature of Owner) qh- ; V 4 �4 44 ' 301 ( �msolo Zo. S. (CO- OI NPTS i 4o - tit, TAB�E���`s_ _ (Address) ", ,,`, 7 �q - �,,5 c /as �•% �,�;�. °,,.��4;� � " (City) (State) 88 3 - (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and to in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulation �c tR� ton Planning Department ::::'::: : filing of such applto \J JUN ct- '4//VG OW% Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON .(: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM OF REND. . • (-----' aEG�111ED �� JUN 28 1976 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ,S'�-f'•6 -T6. Application 'No. ' .,"e," — /O�- � :) ' • ' .� . Environmental Checklist No. �e�-/Sf-7‘ ��NG DES PROPOSED, .date: _ FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance . ®Declaration of Significance . • • , ' • . • ElDeclaration of: Non-Significance , 0 Declaration of. Non-Significance .:::;; :..,,COMMENTS::-.. ' ' Introduction The State Environmental 'Policy• Act .of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires • all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental_ values both for their , own actions and when licensing private proposals . The• Act also requires that an EIS be • prepared for all major -actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. . The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a i . , • proposal 'is such' a major action. ' ' - Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information ' . .: f; . presently -available to you. Where explanations of p your answers are required, or where ,: you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include. your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should . include' references to any reports ,or studies of which you are aware and which are rele • - . ,:,. • vant to the answers you provide., Complete answers to -these questions now will help all • agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary 'delay. , The following questions apply to"your' total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers �` . _' should include the impacts which will be• caused by your proposal when -it -is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all.• of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. . ,.. ,, NOTE : This- is a standard form being used -by all state and local agencies in the State • -.:, ... ,- of Washington. for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your. proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question.' . • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ' I .`• • BACKGROUND • ' • . , '. .. 1. Name of Proponent (2an ) fr • 4opr i e'er 2. Address- and phone number of Proponent: • . . . 60-61 / /2 S /70 — Ali_-I. Sal k) Q, 7 b D,v` am , Rs,71._RI9x : •,. • _ , . . • . • . . . . , . • . • ,. • ,. . - 3. Date Checklist submitted 6/,,�s?g ...4. Agency requiring Checklist C.J'4- Q , �P4'1 -�V �10111 ki . Qf3Qi^77''�1e1 i . 5. Name of proposal , if applicable , • • - • . JI' . ' ' 6. Nature and brief .description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general' design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and •nature) : • / q r�✓ rc//����7�� (o,icis4s n-P lira X� �7�l � t 1 l erPS a kid s a m I # 0-P Mil Made. 'Arita InS. wi rcA 1 Ylf,l la m ' �14r . . , uG I C{h/( SrWC d'r ac/'S jr+ hi1,I , fir/nG fit)AS. .71€_ .111h + 0, ed o 1 f r-'f- "r C� �S �D. �jI/!9 Tl!/� � /P/.�P/ /^c��t��_`Ff^DY/1 dUC we:- A � (-rte.) n an nid s6g �u „d� s i pm /ier ) pi' eth&i tdr TOIL,•- ,..- d mPI/ . -.2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well • as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : • 7`j >10,�0, rtiC /,dr'a 71e hp 711tie 1 ,_ /ft)ef9U /0OF 4/ • 4)14' y tl(�/ i(114u,P. A110iA1 ,4P- i49o,en Yiv /b4C1 /fin) • 1.4 i 41 e -P1 Cl tie)/ 1-1 e putt, 4- (con 44 /- ;i/. R7.. /i; I� ct d � . 8. . Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 9. List of all permits', licenses or government approvals required for the proposal ', (federal , state and local --including rezones) : y 4 1 PeiA,11 • �J / cm /e, //iti/t l ri7i'l/:"-//:s: fiche, 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: • • 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: • • kr-utothia Il ae•�'�`I toil A 6/42 0 ehe.ea/ 1 e A R' , ' 1 12. At ach any other application form that has been comp' ted regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: • • II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) ( 1) Earth. Will' the proposal result in: • (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (/ YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil ? r • • , YES . MAYBE NO • (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? 14AYBE N� (d) The destruction., covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YE- MAYBE NO e (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , • y / either on or off the site? Y S MAYB NO • (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of. the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? d� I / ll YES MAYBE NO ' Explanation,: "C1) and (C) 'rit e, & ,r7491 R c/ crewel and SUa i d as i�-S Cl-e, a re.st:4A 6 preilioitc i')'1a17" -mod •• aC71/c)}iS /i1102 7G ' nS�t 7 tPmdv_e_, • � r,1Pi►os>ks - yn4/n+a«1 a Ie"O e l C1 I�U� i, • • -3- (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MA BE NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? • YES MAYBE NO— ., (c) Alteration of air movement , moisture or temperature, • or any change in climate, either locally ,or regionally? L/ • YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in ctrrents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? • YES MAYBE NO '• (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES M YBE NO (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? • YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water • ody? YES MAYBE • NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature , dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ' ' YES MAYBE N (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of • • ground waters? YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either • ' through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate , phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances ,into the ,ground .waters? l/ YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? , Y€E- MAYBE No Expllanation: D ) a rFfeil7�lcrl �Ll/1GL Gull / �j� d�''Srlp.p1 • (4) Flora; Will the proposal result in: r . (a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora ( including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? ES MAYBE NTT- • (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE NO (c) Introductio.n of new species of flora into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MAYBE NO (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? • J YES MAYBE NO' \. Explanation : /l ��O Q1�TL has SCQ#erari ' &.i nip' dT • :S Ol dt 41e/P f d trued �t �- (;`,`I` IGZII�//M it er, I. ;. V V • • • • . -4- ' (5) Fauna. Will ' the proposal result in: . , (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of • any species of fauna (birds, land animals including . . reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , • insects or microfauna)? O YES MAYBE N (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna? L/ YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , ' or result in a barrier to the migration or movement , of fauna? • YES MAYBE NO f (d) Deterioration to• existing fish or wildlife habitat? _!� • YES MAYBE Explanation: (6) • Noise Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? - YES MAYBE NO Explanation:• • (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new :light or / . . glare? �/ . ' . YES' MAYBE WO- ' Explanation: • -- (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the �/ ' present or planned land use of an area? — Tn MAYBE NO Explanation: —" . (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in : . (a) Increase in the rate 'of use of any natural resources? L-' YES MAYBE NO . "(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? . M 1� YES YBE NO p raue I_.ko sand' reina d •c1^(gym 1-1 is Ex lanation: eirti. area ; 0_ lI 11 P, _"s1.r 1 i�' ar ea'S t ciirir / / __ •. ( 10) Risk of Upset. Does the. proposal involve a risk of an • explosion. or the release of hazardous substances (including , but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) • in the event of an accident or upset conditions? • S MAYBE NO • Explanation: • (11)• Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population ' • • ' of an 'area'?`' • YES MAYBE. NA Explanation: ' • • -5- (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or . create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) _ Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES • MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? • YES ) M NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YE MAYBENO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or • movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase. in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? • YES— MAYBE N • Explanation: W 'f/i.Q) /124.J''ei'`/eX /S l'PrnhJ0 to( anitel/2t/i •trutie 1 a ' ) 1,,oli(c.h ('S eo ii,dri 11 ''J 1a area q i)/ 7J 0PM P a 7 (S ,' P• . Y. • tvrita _4/4 V 10.10 (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , •or result in a need for new or altered governmental services • in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? YES RTYW NO • (b) Police protection? • YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? YES WIFE NO • . (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO • (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? • YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO . • • Explanation: • • • • ( 15) Energy.: Will the proposal result in : (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Q� YES MAYBE NO • (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE NU— Explanation: • ( 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need, for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : (a) Power or natural gas? YES M-ATTE N.O / (b) Communications systems? �/ YES MAYBE NO• (c) Water? YES MAYBE NO • • -6- • • (d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? • YES MAYBE el.. (f) Solid waste and disposal? ✓ . , YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • ( 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of ' any health hazard or, potential health hazard (excluding . • 1,,// • mental health)? • • YES MAYBE NU Explanation: � . ' ' -,,(18) • Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of • any scenic vista or view open to the public , or will the - proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive /• site open to public view? �/ . YES MAYBE NO Explanation: , _ __ _ • r . ( 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the / • quality or quantity of -existing recreational opportunities? ���/// YES MAYBE , NO Explanation: • L , (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an • ' alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure , object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: . III . SIGNATURE . - I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete.- It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful• misrepresentation or willful lack ,crf7full disclosure on my part. . Proponent: L' /�%'�'yl-i-d .i --. 6 s:i'gned) printed) City. of Renton Planning Department . . 5-76 -._ ------. '_r4.•�•.ra�—tea».......- ---- -- • • d/ ia,; /7- • W1TNESSETIi: That the seller agrees to sell to the purchaser and the purchaser agrees to purchase from the seller the following dr rriLed real estate, with the appurtenances, in King County, Stale of Washington: portion of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 8 Township 23 North, e 1, Fast , W.M. , in King County, Washington, and 'of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast ter of Section 17 Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying 3cv1- ty of County Road No. 174 "Southeast 128th Street", East 'of the Northeasterly line of aitlit of way deeded to Puget Sound Power & Light Company by deed recorded under Auditor' s No. 2500774, and North of the Northerly line of the:more Northerly of the strips of land r•rl to City of Renton for street by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 5684193, . except portion thereof deeded to First National Associates by deeds recorded under Auditor's File er:; 6320179 and 6553042 and described as follows: The East 242 feet, as measured parallel he Fast line of the North 400 feet, as measured at right angles to said East line, of that ion of the North half of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 17 Town- 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying Southeasterly of County 11o. 174 and Easterly of Puget Sound Power and Light Company transmission line right of wn,, • except that portion thereof lying within the East 30.00 feet of said subdivi'sion_ and North he 'laird Avenue North extension, deeded to City of Renton by deed recorded under Auditor's No. 7111050330. • •• �' ,. q C JECT TO: Water right granted under Auditor's File No. 1459217.. rL.•2`3.L�S C` /.s trfeNcd to in this contract,"date of closing" shall be_----_-4.' — 5a— NoVernber-9, 1973 't • t • • • • •WITNESSET-H: That the seller agrees to se➢1 to the purchaser and lbe purchaser agrees to purchase horn the seller the following described real estate, with the appurtenances, in King • County, Slate of Waslington: The East 242 feet, as measured% parallel to the East line of the North 400 feet, as ; measured at right angles to said East line, of that portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 17, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W. M. , in King County, Washington, lying Southeasterly of County Road No. 174 and Easterly of Puget Sound Power and Light Company transmission line right-of-way, and Except that portion thereof lying within the East 30.00 feet of said subdivision, deeded to City of Renton, by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 7111050331. • • (.)� R[CFNED • ,JUN• • 28 1976 • • 'VG D • P