Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SWP273205(1)
CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Kathy -Wheeler, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator November 29, 2005 Bruce Dilbert, Engineering Services Manager - Washington State Department of Transportation I-405 Corridor Program 600 - 108th Avenue NE, Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004 Dear Mr. Dilbert: The City of Renton submits the following comments in response to your letter dated October 26, 2005. The location of City -owned utilities such as water and sanitary sewer (with the exception of storm sewer) as shown on the submitted utility plan is consistent with the City's records and construction plans for the utilities shown. It is recommended that WSDOT as -built survey the ' storm crossings to confirm their correct location as well.as identify potential conflicts by potholing all utilities to determine the vertical elevation prior to the design of the I-405 improvements. We disagree with your statement that the City will be held financially responsible for contract delay costs and for damages to our utilities, if sub -surface investigations are not done to identify the potential utility conflicts during the design process. Existing utilities must be protected from damages during the construction of the project unless they are relocated ahead of the construction activities. We would also like to point out that with the exception of Identifier 146, all the identified storm sewer crossings within WSDOT right-of-way are under the ownership of WSDOT and any requirement to upsize, replace or modify, as necessary, is the responsibility of WSDOT. Based , on review of the Utility Permit for the Identifier 146 provided with WSDOT's letter, it would appear that the permit simply gives the City permission to construct the outfall in the WSDOT right-of-way. Except where modification to the City's outfall is required, WSDOT is responsible for any improvements of Identifier 146 as the culvert is conveying flow that naturally discharges across WSDOT right-of-way. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 ® This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 30% post consumer RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE 0 6 0 0 3 m _ a W CD cc V1 5 0 X 0 6 0 n 0 CD _ 0 _T V CD O x T CD X y ww O W wwrnrnrnrnrno) O t0 v 0) (J W rn IQ rn w cn co cnNrn UIDENTIFIoW> -�A ccn -�I -�i-�I Can CO cn ��I -�-I -�i -i UTILITY TYPE nnn n 0 n n 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o cD ce cD rn m co m UTILITY OWNER m CD m co m m m co 0 m m m 0m m CD m CD CD cD cD r-' O •+ O O 0 0 O 0 O O 0 r.• O - O rN• O rr O M O '•h O •M O M O /•► O r� rr '•�• rw p•M rF 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O FRANCHISE N (RPC NUMBER) NN C7 U) NN A W NNNN-+ cn ► ► -�NN-►CD co N W W N -+ W CNN HIGHWAY �! W Cfl N tD C) O O c0 D7 N co to tV hl 1J O Iv N -► oo CA P CAA p oo o MIMROST _ O = -! (0 CC) O U1 N � i»4CA7EON Zz ZZZZZZZZ Z ZZZZZZZZZ� mom -D .D PC#POSSIBLE C� c) n n n n n n n n n n n 0 0 0 0 0 n n n 000 n n n n D�,D 000 . CONFLICT NC = NO CONFLICT NA J W � O J O 4 p) W V , W N co N N PPOTI ECTIOty .la O) V p O (In feet) wA J RELOCATION O A WETLAND '' AREA c N 'STREAM AREA AGREEMENT cn o u=i m v=i 5 v, nCOK> = -* > �1m o Z7 Z CD rn o_ '✓ cD m o cn Q = cD CD O -i = 0 <D n CD nD CD NO a CD Q o CD m - 1CD 0 � x cao � = a coy IIj can . QO _. _ O (D m (C to CD co CD CD = O m Z p O 00 N 0 C p) � (D a: = D co D (n 0 �p rn �, (D y o Cl) - m m m 0 o cn CD 00 CD �N Ln (DfD CD _ (OA co = Q' fD 7' O 0 .' O CD 3r a cr (D O Q p S. .+ Q p S. + B (D (n 0) O•• Z7 a p v `< (D n CA p y n Z cr a CD U) .. p C0 0 0 .» m 3 0 am _ �� 'cam 0 P- O "INa .. a o � D =. = m Cl) ate) �. 0 a y ,EF o m ac — cn (Da CD = m a) m cc to o cD a y 0 CD cn v m -n o C m CA CD =a N FILE YT < -< -< r u -< < Im NOTD-NF CD 3 ic W K Cn O CD Cn O 00 Cn O -1 Cn O W A► W .A. A+. N A N A N" O A cD .P. -h cn w cn W W w N N cn Ln ,A. Aa -N p A. W toOT1I.IIT1' MENTIFIE .0.-+ -• Cn Oo O CD OD -4 A cD -7 -I -� -i, cn --I -I cn cn UTILITY TYPE O -., O o -.� 0 0 O O O O -. o o O -» O O -. O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 O -. IiTILITY OWNER N cD 0 cD 0 cD cD 0 cD cD 0 cD 0 cD cD (D cD CD CD cD cD 0 cD 0 rM O IM o •M 0 Iy 0 r4 0 /q� O M O r► o rK 0 rrt 0 rM o rr O rti• O •rt O rrt O rM O rti• O rM O r► O •Y O M O rM O r� O iM O Lm (n Lm w R�r fNC,1 1SE 00 ODD 00 0 00 N M�ER O00 00 00OND 0 co 00 jQO MBER) Ln4,�- wwcaww W K3 W W �l 0N0 N OA0 W O cD O W co W N ••► N . a -I .a O O O 00 A N �I 'Hx*llk111lfAY M'[» PE1ST CA Aa .� Cn ItJCA'fl!C1N N PC PO.WIBLE z z z z z Zz z z z z z z z z z z z z z zzzz C0NFLf.i.�'NC� >�Ic �o1v��ICT ECTIQN 0)iTteet) RmocAmN WETLAND AREA STREAM AREA AQREEMENT o o nc=n 00 CD Q cn CD m 00 _�'n c o =� CD II)B 3N = ^ 3 o N ca O O O O 0 O a in Cb co O cn I O _ ' -r n ? i O A O cD m n n o °' O m d -, _ CID_ CCDD CDo m 0 CD33 C CD ca u m cD �0 Pr CD c, CD CD y o -Zi N c� ay Na:� -n o C = y 0 0.. Z 0 0 CD D ccn m 0 � CD I - cl) j cn 0 00 O c W ' C.' ON FILE Y -< z Z -< F1LE NOT FOUND-NF N Cl O Cn pi �° ),� hoe \ \ , � �;• ;. \ ,h�,. �1 •4 p 1N3� � � Y \ \ . \ ,1. � 1 o 0 Ob \f , co ^,\ . 17 4- oQ/ � I q It ° � ° p,; / !o: J -,, a ,w , • \ � , :. 'u41 OR co co 06 cz z m ♦ rn \ • m> Z ' I / -i• Ilk / —J —N — —IM — ..N ....•..•-N — N I I co III CO D \ t I w a 1 Ilk it w III cl m /\ I I t \ `i O d• �\� ° ° 6 t 1`� , II o9Irn1, 1 uIAD r- m m I o r t. ie x � \ -0 rc o � %�\�7 / /�A\�/ °�/'' �. �jjy�,._�ae�c+layi` ill '• II I�I I ' r y _er-n. � �' ♦♦ ': Ire W6 o O 77 000 A� •— ——,,,ter ` ` \ '.1 1 _ - `\"-_F -� ._ _ _ _ _- . _ _ � .: � ♦` �\ \ �i' '1 Null 1 I ' I: l0 1, � \� "' � � i W a '°' ` � : �. _ `� \�\ � � % .� I I I ' i \��� / ��( '� fit• - --- _-- ---' •-- Ou W J ^� r^ / I O < =3 cc Q 1 m` --- • i _ sv 1 .. :� :•: I s..- i4 t 1 -�N'AP.L'E � N — — N — •L11 +e�- M.+� —. eo e —d0— -d0-•b dam• I1 n °,•0. - Fes•- is - j c) �- w , : �.• 0 1 , I � Y y �� tj 1u 11 1 1 lt I I s SU L - d "1 e l I I i is- - _iS —15 —Is I I I I a d° , M r". to —ls— � .- 1 W 1 L" � _ = II Ii W : I a. mz 1 . r 1 , •' rc. ` a •�. �,• 1 ILAI s f 1 1 u gp _ep— u J7C —�— w � 1 .1 � - � I w � •o m� � ,` 1 = ° 1 �1 III I I � it � •. ... •1 1 I ' I �1 �1 TI l is , Is S__ II wa le Ln I .I �. l c°°• -;, 1 0' --0--0-- T+ _ 0--0--0-- 1p —� —N—�- —11--•IN P1 11 / -d0— —d0 p —d0——d0� .� 1 • rg: � � I B ►• I ° I 'I - I' II':11 • r C�J e ;� roek i7 _r,-� a \��,\•\ y i rn • _ \�, \ /'���" , � I , I 11 /;`- d !�/� � {y _.I \• \ 1'I I II III ... \ ;o a / \ q. �.__ -�dd•l 0_ - �1 -d0- -do- -do- -da- NO c\ O • i I +I '.I/ N / -. �•- dOT -do- -do- d0.- -.,do �-00- - dC /�/- o- -do--dI0—,r•do- -do--do- h � s 11 0 1 All h I I$ I • � I i 1 i I I I 1` 1 I:, � I � ��y° �-+• $i� �/$ Lam./ I• I 1 � III I I I I� �� —__ / $ t'' ;' I — > .. —OP- oP � oP _ _ II K. \vq I r - -• -----� \� a�\� t Z`LA - m r .. - `\I ` ' I / � 1 � „ M 1.-'•,/► ' •' I NON ..• llj • .n c I w m m I I i 6 I I F�—ram 5 '�' S� St-•-5..-- i .. �, 11 j m o j •. L—A--A--11---A--A-- �I p ° NDc n.r / ';$ _ 4 yl._._y--_.y—_M_—y—y--Ilp I z RMO m / wq of $ // $ 1N� • O, I 1 ?, - oIr - 7 ran m 0 1 1 1 � _-0 1 2 ram 10 o� n • I I mar,,,� mod( m 0 _ rs zeIA. ca rn ' p g° <.+" Ai1�y'r " $ ^rc� p�� Sir \I, R'C`m z '- = m Nth1• � . i. �� � � yb 1I I � oP-_ _ ozom I ,1 _-.Y qa -- _ • Op 1�� v_.a _._....r�._. s 1� - 1 -- — `- ��' / •A op - CA OD. I e I c-Nao �, a+ �' �? CID Lk rM--M--M--MI �\ Ic 5 is 1 II s I $ M b T- M A .oi - A - - A - A - - M - - A - � i •\•• \ - -. J` ... 00 161 cx ,,I os I / LA as sA f'SI ' Ate' j 11v' i 1 I Zl sk LA 4�1 lot •pi* ` • �S\ la' I � � '' � �o dry.: ° �f\ � ia3nto 8V(33*3 ° lKIN prrl Vbt y to = 1 1 r ♦4 1 s.. Ln n t 1 a 1 \ . r `° CD lk O OD nVA '-� i 1 a ka, i ► �` \ \•� ,'A � J!1 1 a •: a . � --o--o—— o— —o — —o— _a— !o--o— .• .. .. .- —d0— —dO— —d0 -MO— s ' .,• . ,I I i H° u �.•>� - .� I 1 .. of Y{ � � ___..-.. __._ - -- . i h• � stiff i i i � N— M� T kA -1 -`� SI°8\3I m ,t r^ ti 8 ' l y 11 �1 •��' j:4I o o •1 �' ' `1 I I � 80°S1 3I I *TM--Yr-w — J M-9Z°bi 3I 0 II �°to • �I � I I � cn t : RE N I I II I' • Y _ _ M _ N _ — M — _ _ M _1 — t1 I � �y�,.. no^rt N N — — M — _ N — — N — — N — L- I iN N' `- 1 •Sa77.' TjK - 3'"—t3n== S= SSA=^ 15 o IKOH ''I N308VO NOON I H I 77 N--N— M--N--M--M-1 o 10188v 1 I I; I I ' I! 0 I I M r N— M_ I, I II r �l� � ,•.� ill I ONIONVI °• andsmvl l.w•,t I! I �, ff•at V I � ' I I c-fa•it .oc_... I IT: 31 I I bS°9T 3I I '�I t r ` - II 3sVHd :831N30 =° I of I -•11 � "I N i — — �0I330 A311VA ..9d3T I , I � 1 ellit I \� -- -- --- - - - - - _ - Ronald Straka - City Utility Conflict Review with 1-405 (West Valley HWY to Maple Vally HWY Page 1 From: Ronald Straka To: Allen Quynn; Ronald Straka Start: 11 /08/2005 Due: 11/28/2005 Subject: City Utility Conflict Review with 1-405 (West Valley HWY to Maple Vally HWY WSDOT is requesting that we review their information regarding City Utilities (including storm systems) within their ROW that conflicts with their proposed improvements. Please review this updated map and list of storm systems that WSDOT claims is our facility. TO; C. DATE:44 Q Please Call Q For your Information ISSUE/CONCERN: �j l'I%Jv-J --- (� For Action Q For Signature Q Your Recommendation GOAL/ _ Q Per our Conversation PREFERRED OUTCOME: � LIZA/ Q Per your Request Q Copies of this note sent to: , SPECIFIC DO'S OR DON'TS: L ' f /.�✓I FOLLOW UP: qw 6L7 Q TICKLER FILE (date) Q COMPLETED (date) 1 RESULTS: DUE DATE: forms/ACTMEMOI .DOC/LAG/bh Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit October 26, 2005 City of Renton Nc Gregg Zimmerman Public Works Administrator Ci7i'pBEiNT`>>, 1055 South Grady WayB° tS Renton, WA 98055 Subject: I-405, West Valley Highway to Maple Valley Highway Milepost 0.00 to Milepost 3.5 SR 167 Milepost 24.6 to Milepost 26.2 Dear Mr. Zimmerman, 600 - 108th Avenue NE, Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004 Main 425-456-8500 Fax 425-456-8600 The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is continuing to advance its design for the above referenced project. Our information indicates that the City of Renton has facilities within the planned project limits that potentially are in conflict with improvements proposed for our project. The following is a listing of City of Renton (COR) utilities that are in potential conflict with the above noted project. This list includes utilities within WSDOT right of way as identified from utility permits on file with WSDOT, utilities within WSDOT right of way without known permits as identified by COR staff, and utilities that are outside WSDOT Limited Access Right of Way. Utility Permits on record (highlighted in yellow on plan sheets): Identifier Milepost Permit Number Potential Conflict 146 2.04 10933 Yes 212 2.84 7-1808 Yes 335 25.94 (SR 167) K 3896 Yes 409 3.12 18502 Utilities without known permit (highlighted in green on plan sheets): Identifier Milepost Permit Number 159 1.55 Unknown 238 2.78 Unknown 246 3.09 Unknown 252 429 3.49 2.77 Unknown Unknown Utilities outside WSDOT Limited Access Right of Way: Identifier Roadway 430 Benson Road 431 Benson Road Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes MS: NB82-250 Aft MWashington State , Department of Transportation We have revised our original existing utility plan sheets to incorporate the information being continuously supplied by COR staff as well as by other owners with utilities located in the vicinity of the proposed project improvement. For your convenience, the enclosed plan sheets show utilities with WSDOT issued utility permits highlighted in yellow and COR utilities without utility permits highlighted in green. Please, review the attached plan sheets for accuracy, and forward any corrections or comments to me at the I-405 office as soon as possible. In reviewing the plans, please verify that all COR easements within and adjacent to the WSDOT right of way and all COR owned utilities are shown. To assist with your review, please find enclosed a spreadsheet listing COR utilities, potential conflicts, and possible remedies for that conflict. It is important to us that your facilities are properly represented and that any potential conflicts are identified early in the design process. Failure to verify this information could endanger your facilities during project construction and result in the City of Renton being financially responsible for contract delay cost. For COR utilities without known permits issued by WSDOT, this would be a good opportunity to have permits issued. If these utilities are covered under an easement or an agreement with the WSDOT, please supply us a copy of that document for our records. We must have this information by November 30th, 2005 at the very latest to meet our project design schedule. As you are aware our project designers and your utility managers have been meeting on a regular monthly schedule to discuss COR utilities within the project limits. Once we have received the above information we will be able to discuss how to resolve these conflicts between your utilities and our project. If you have any questions concerning this request please call Mike Cowles at 425456-8619 or you may email Mike at mike.cowles(a)i405.wsdot.wa.gov. Sin erely, Bruce Dibert Engineering Services Manager bd Encl: Renton Nickel Improvement Project Utility Basemap cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director Nick Afzali, Transportation Planning and Programming Manager Bob Briggs, Utility Engineer UCO I-405 Office File SR- 11001 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PERMIT NO: Name and Address of Applicant: UTILITY PERMIT 10933 City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 DISTRICT NO. 1 The applicant, hereinafter referred to as the "Utility", having applied fora permit to construct, operate /8 and maintain a>2inch storm drain outfalI to existing ditch and culverts on a portion of State Route A'o. 405 in Ki ng County, Washington, the Washington State Department of Transportation or its designee, hereinafter referred to as the "Department ", hereby orders that this permit be granted. subject to the terms and provisions stated upon the reverse hereof and Exhibits attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. - Exhibit "A". Special Provisions for Permits and Franchises, Pages I and 2 and 3 Exhibit "B". Right-of-way plans entitled, "SR 405, Jct. SSH No. 2-M to Jct. PSH No. 2 in Renton", page 1 Exhibit "C". Plan details, pages 1-2 Located north of the centerline of SR 405 opposite approximate Milepost 2.04 located in Goverment Lot 3 of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. The location of the facility described above is further illustrated on the attached map designated Exhibit "B", page 1 This permit is accepted and approved by the Utility subject to the terms and provisions as herein set forth. UTILITY i By: Title: -V4e )�,• �� pY%r!S Date: 1OZ16ZF � fZecJ . 1 T4 CJ V L", , G�c �+1►� DEPART EIW OF TRANSPORTATION bli�TR ICT UTILITIES ENGINEER D. DOT roRm 224-001 REVISED6/79 .a GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. This permit is subject to RCW 47.32.170 and/or RCW 47.44.050 and Chapter 252-04 WAC and amendments thereto. 2. During the progress of the work such barriers shall be erected and maintained as may be necessary or as may be directed for the protection of the traveling public; the barriers shall be properly lighted at night. 3. The Utility, its successors and assigns, agrees to protect the State of Washington and save it harmless from all claims, actions or damages of every kind and description which may accrue to or be suffered by any person, persons, or property by reason of the performance of any such work, character of materials used or manner of installation, maintenance and operation, or by the occupancy of rights of way by the Utility; in case any suit or action is brought against the State for damages arising out of or by reason of any of the above causes, the petitioner, its successors or assigns will, upon notice of commencement of such action, defend the same at its sole cost and expense and satisfy any judgment arising therefrom if determined adverse to the State of Washington. 4. Except as herein authorized, no excavation shall be made or obstacle placed within the limits of the state highway in such a manner as to interfere with the travel over said road. 5. If the work done under this permit interferes in any way with the drainage of the state highway, the Utility shall wholly and at its own expense make such provision as the Department may direct to take care of said drainage. 6. On completion of said work herein contemplated all rubbish and debris shall be immediately removed and the roadway and roadside shall be left neat and presentable and satisfactory to the Department. 7. All of the work herein contemplated shall be done under the supervision and to the satisfaction of the Department and the entire expense of said supervision shall be borne by the party or parties to whom this permit is issued. 8. The Department hereby reserves the right to order the change of location or the removal of any structure or structures auth- orized by this permit at any time, said change or removal to be made at the sole expense of the party or parties to whom this permit is issued, or their successors and assigns. 9. All such changes, reconstruction or relocation by the Utility shall be done in such manner as will cause the least interference \kith any of the State's work and the State of Washington shall in no wise be held liable for any damage to the Utility by reason of any such work by the State of Washington, its agents or representatives, or by the exercise of any rights by the State upon roads, streets, public places or structures in question. 10. This permit or privelege shall not be deemed or held to be an exclusive one and shall not prohibit the Department from grant- ing other permits or franchise rights of like or other nature to other public or private utilities, nor shall it prevent the Depart- ment from using any of its roads, streets, or public places, or affect its right to full supervision and control over all or any part of them, none of which is hereby surrendered. i 1. The Department may revoke, amend or cancel this permit or any of the provisions thereof at any time by giving written notice to the Utility. The Utility shall immediately remove all facilities from the right of way. Any facilities remaining upon the right of way 30 days after written notice of cancellation shall be removed by the State at the expense of the Utility. 12. The party or parties to whom this permit is issued shall maintain at its or their sole expense the structure or object for which this permit is granted in a condition satisfactory to the Department. 13. If the Utility enters into a contract or agreement with a contractor to perform the work provided herein to be performed by the Utility, the Utility for itself, its assigns and its successors in interest, agrees that it will not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, or national origin in its choice of contractors and will include all of the non-discrimination provisions set forth in Appendix "A" from Title VI of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and Section 162(a) of the Federal Aid Act of 1973 (23 U.S.C. 324), and as said Regulations may be amended. Breach of any of the above non-discrimination covenants shall be cause for cancellation as herein provided. 14. Any breach of any of the conditions and requirements herein made, or failure on the part of the Utility of this permit to proceed with due diligence and in good faith after its acceptance, with construction work hereunder, shall subject this permit to cancellation as herein provided. 15. The Utility pledges that performance of routine cutting and trimming work will be accomplished in such a manner that the roadside appearance will not be disfigured. When major work is involved, or damage to roadside appearance may become significant, the holder shall secure the approval of the Department in advance of the work. WasNi,otoin:t.to" SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR ffir Op>Ktmfltnt of Tr�nsporta.tlon PERMITS AND FRANCHISES Permit/RMifMM No. 10933 Applicable provisions are denoted by W 0 1, No work provided for herein shall be performed until the Utility is granted authorization by the Department's representative: Name: Roy A. Arwine Title: District Utilities Engineer Address: P.O. Box C-81410, Seattle, WA 98108 Telephone No.: 233-2308 2. Prior to the beginning of construction, a preconstruction conference shall be held at which the Department and the Utility and his engineer, contractor, and inspector shall be present. X3. Should the Utility choose to perform the work outlined herein with other than its own forces, a representative of the Utility shall be present at all times while the construction is in progress unless otherwise agreed to by the Department. All contact between the Department and the Utility's contractor shall be through the representative of the Utility. Where the Utility chooses to perform the work with its own forces, it may elect to appoint one of its employees engaged in the construction as its representative. Failure to comply with this provision shall be grounds for restricting any further work by the Utility within the right-of-way, until said requirement is met. IW 4. A copy of the permit or franchise must be on the job site, and protected from the elements, at all times during any of the construction authorized by said permit or franchise within the Department's right-of-way. ❑ 5. The Utility agrees to schedule the work herein referred to and perform said work in such a manner as not to delay the Department's con- tractor in the performance of his contract. ❑ 6. The Utility agrees that when placing its facility within any portions of the roadbed, the trench shall be backfilled in horizontal layers not to exceed 6 inches in loose thickness, except that the layers of the top 2 feet from profile grade shall not exceed 4 inches in loose thickness. Each layer of the entire backfill shall be compacted to not less than 95 percent of the maximum density as determined by compaction control tests. The moisture content of the backfill material at the time of compaction shall be as specified by the Department. In no case will "water settling" be allowed. 7. Work shall be restricted to the hours between 9 a.m. and 3 : 30 p.m. and no work shall be allowed on the right-of-way Saturdays, Sundays or Holidays unless otherwise authorized by the Department. 8. In the event any milepost, right-of-way marker, fence or guard rail is located within the limits of this project and will be disturbed during construction, these items will be carefully removed prior to construction and reset or replaced at the conclusion of construction to the satisfaction of the Department. All signs and traffic control devices must be maintained in operation during construction. 9. Prior to construction, the Utility shall contact the Department's representative (listed under Special Provision Number 1) to ascertain the location of survey control monuments within the project limits. In the event any monuments will be altered, damaged or destroyed by the project, appropriate action will be taken by the Department, prior to construction, to reference or reset the monuments. Any monuments altered, damaged or destroyed by the Utility's operation will be reset or replaced by the Department at the sole expense of the Utility. 10. If determined necessary by the Department, any or all of the excavated material shall be removed and replaced with suitable material as specified by the Department. ❑ 11. Wherever deemed necessary by the Department of Labor and Industries and/or the Department of Transportation, for the safety of the workers and the protection of the highway pavement, the sides of the trench (or excavation) shall be adequately supported to reduce the hazard to workers and prevent any damage by cracks, settlement, etc. to the pavement. No other work in the trench or excavation area will be allowed until this requirement is met. ❑ 12. Trenches shall be backfilled as soon as possible behind the laying of pipe or cable. No open trenches shall be left overnight. This includes boring or jacking pits which shall be covered with lumber or other material of sufficient strength to withstand the load of highway traffic if the pit is not to be backfilled with material each night. ❑ 13. All crossings of road intersections surfaced with oil, asphalt concrete pavement or cement concrete pavement shall be accomplished by jacking, boring, or augering the cable or pipe under the roadway. ❑ 14. The cable or pipe shall be placed within a suitable encasement as specified on the attached exhibits. Said encasement pipe shall be jacked, bored, or sugared through the highway grade with a minimum depth of 5 feet from top of casing to finished road grade and a minimum of 3`b feet of depth from bottom of ditch to top of casing. w" REVISED s/e3 Page 1 EXHIBIT "A" ❑ 15, The shoulders, where disturbed shall be surfaced with crushed surfacing top course Inches minimum compacted depth, or as directed by the District Administrator. The surface of the finished shoulder shall slope down from the edge of pavement at the rate of 'h inch per foot unless otherwise directed. The restored shoulder must not have any strips or sections less than 2 feet wide. The re- stored shoulder shall be surfaced with 16, All slopes, slope treatment, top soil, ditches, pipes, etc., disturbed by this operation shall be restored to their original cross section and condi- tion. All open trenches shall be marked by warning signs, barricades, lights and if necessary, flagmen shall be employed for the purpose of protecting the traveling public. Roadside operations shall be specified by the District Administrator. 17. In the construction and/or maintenance of this facility, the Utility shall comply with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. If determined necessary by the State, the Utility shall submit a signing and traffic control plan to the State's repre- sentative for approval prior to construction or maintenance operations. Y 18. No routine maintenance of this facility will be allowed within the limited access area. ❑ 19, Routine maintenance of this facility will not be permitted from the through traffic roadways or ramps of SR and all service to this facility will be by access from ❑ 20. Where applicable, markers shall be placed at each right-of-way line for all crossings and placed every 500 feet for longitudinal lines to include: company name, pipeline or cable identification, telephone number for contact, and the distance from the marker to the line in feet. Markers shall be placed so as to minimize interference with maintenance operations. Markers shall also be placed at all changes in offset distance from right-of-way line or centerline of highway. ❑ 21. in the event that construction and maintenance of the highway facility within the proximity of the utility installation becomes necessary during the period which the Utility will occupy a portion of the right-of-way, it is expressly understood that, upon request from the State's representative, the Utility will promptly identify and locate by suitable field markings any and all of their underground facilities so that the State or its contractor can be fully apprised'at all times of its precise location. X22. The Utility shall notify the Department's representative upon completion of the work under this permit or franchise so that a final Inspection can be made and shall immediately furnish to the District Utilities Engineer a revised franchise or permit plan of the final location or reloca- tion of its facilities if the original franchise or permit plans have been revised during the course of construction. ❑ 23. Bond coverage required to ensure proper compliance with all terms and conditions of said permit or franchise will be furnished by a Blanket Surety Bond held at Headquarters in Olympia. ❑ 24. A surety bond in the amount of S , written by a surety company authorized to do business in the State of Washington, shall be furnished to the Department, prior to the start of construction, to ensure compliance with any and all of the terms and conditions of this permit or franchise, and shall remain in force for a period ending year(s) after date of completion of construction. ❑ 25. The Utility agrees to bury the aerial lines covered by this franchise in Scenic Classes "A" and "B", as defined on attached Exhibit either at the time of major reconstruction of the line, for that portion of line to be reconstructed, or prior to expiration of this franchise. ❑ 26. The Utility agrees to bury the aerial lines covered by this franchise in Scenic Classes "A", "AX", "B" and/or "BX", as defined on attached Exhibit , at the time the pole owner buries its facility. ❑ 27. The Utility agrees to bury or relocate aerially the existing overhead lines in Scenic Classes "AX" and "BX", as defined on attached Exhibit to a location acceptable to the Department either at the time of major reconstruction of the line, for the portion of line to be reconstructed, or prior to the expiration of this franchise. The existing aerial lines may remain in their present location if acceptable to the Department. ❑ 28. The Utility agrees to be responsible for any construction deficiencies as a result of the roadway installation for a period of 2 years from date of completion. ❑ 29. The Utility will be required to maintain one-way traffic during working hours and two-way traffic at all other times. ❑ 30. Construction of facilities proposed under this franchise shall begin no later than 2 years from date of issue. Any utility facilities described herein, not completed within 3 years from date of issue shall require an amendment to this franchise prior to their installation unless other- wise authorized by the Department. DOT FORM 224-030IBACKI Pav2 EXHIBIT `.A" REVISED ti/83 SPECIAL ROVISIONS FOR PERMITS AND FRANCHISES (continued) x 31. The Utility will be required to maintain two-way traffic at all times. x 32. In lieu of a surety bond to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit the City of Renton agrees that the Department may effect reimbursement of the amount necessary to restore the highway from the monthly fuel tax allotments which the City of Renton is normally entitled to receive from the Motor Vehicle Fund, and in accordance with RCW 47.08.090. x 33. Construction of this facility will not be permitted from the through traffic roadways or ramps of SR 405 and all access during construction, for this facility, will be by access from outside the State right-of-way. PERMIT 10933 Page 3 EXHIBIT "A" . ti L 1 � • ( IT l ,� � • } ..incy -y j! . � �� 1 A 0 •? Ij a ' it \ S o $ 1 • t' V b Z �• olf e I. I [[pppp 1• 1 �^ I l- S% 1 1 t 1 >a �m P a a It i 1- v y, N • 9 I E jE ;1.,)IV*cvVC _._._. _ •'_�1 r 0 i - �'2 1� '� o I 1 ' I I to � N ' t ' t 9 Gr) •s pr E `\ - • -4 ere.. wry+ eta) ll*bc�z N . l ,RF r i I � I f :I rr '67-05N OQANYr •CONT12C7L ply ItESr nolvs iJ Rc-v;o;v \v�rZet-tt�V�= 4 �eNiva r�rronl, r.� weois aye Is' n•e+s -reNC�/,, /��' h'f.�iA?�S I SPRVIJT CrJN`�7Rt•�TIC7N Ci?OIJP I �►�+ �s cd/ n...gQ.yr{ ...,{ Igno Gone '..a` �,. sut•ie IOI � erc ucs QS*I,w fia '�etY�i I K9Mr. *ft hev92 i a::A,rdW. 21i-syso I 271.5`7� � I i i ) r . rn Ix rn Ix O amm Sw. Avr,man ser V oA11 v¢h Inc, co\,;Rc>L-- f�ws F�slV�'UN \�/pREHCJl15$ %oT •Slv GanrY �nl, .vra � ��w wT+ � s. Suer wi Caw ..l7P ""-` . l2TM J 4G�lfJi �so�F RTI . SZY/ Ils�rt, w•�a �i8as2 gg� 17i • 4z" -"'-------- rae.n..ior.es R8N7l7N, VA �lEc�s - A Iki�'h a >, Jls dlt. sl4 a a .. a Al NA Im.-•wiQ,IlO!••+NY. tZ 11 IH L•�•ry� I�t• ° - __ ` _ -..� - -.. `'t'`- - J,----- ` 11 g �,D -I- Oile` w o . o � i+• YI»!N N r i;o�t�,Q � _ _ ' �'f•T/F/II:;_i4��. _ .. �_ � --io0- ^l-o- _ ,• � �� � I i Ji-+I !.ilro a P P 01 'i:TtJil9� e� 0� 2 • �'W 'tr h w - Il _J�. • fi, _ ,,. .ott •� -. 1 r o i- s has IIn T -�-au _� '� 6 1 �. t _ Iv: tilvri Y'•� i �I�I=� r rl°� ! '1 1 �. "'^ �— 5 r '' i Y _ ► _ o T NT N%in M -� lJI N IA N ITN M J• U I•1 ' ' ' Z,1 "�„�• �^i�lt� r. rr ��illvlltSn Y N Ili i#� / ' N I + I H - o I O p ! to 1 1 ;:,r.., 1y1 x A 3b IRS a, y'IV� pl�l ,lI• y. NA, v X W °� u ��:t'.(��8 �Io Na i N<° (+ I i• n 1 " Tr' ,,_r a v r•n dl i la g a is q. -+It i�''N vl I (, h +1 J p S ,21`K. _J ' �.{...._ - -- Z {I to u••Itntn •alrO�ro J^pOI:jr i --_�1 --{�% •--�------"I- �'�-Q `pt1..'''•.�r,.`,, w u + d ;�d•I�j°' u0 a d Y oIV-I H Imi •I' Z G ! Cv�\N i =N • .--i : �,1 ' _ N o L CID D r�r i t Z m W u t•' rt I '� J .' Z 1 - J. - - 1 1, k ... •. I i � _ . coo k. st I II 14 • I ,I„I ) l(\_Y _ _... vj J '111 ff W e��S o�rvla ry s � itn, •;° it i I _ � 1 � i 1 `' p�•Wt.lQdoOOpi¢iOOWgpp se I I' Jl I `per i•IO O,`-:!q 0 O 0 OO Oo c! C! I '° II I �l _.�..._ tP 1 tq p ` 1 INrrI� J w ry tPIu1!u SIN 4 1, 'o , , 1-,-, N 1. 3S' 30"E .. .�. - "L��iG - -t- - 1- �-- -- --- '0= V, _J .O�!p'IOpI#AuI♦p r i 88THAvg SO. r y ' a pltD PIN. Uli• dh-N,a• NLL O 1 r , I IOI I I F 'n ► II ' •", �. �.._.r....-T-.: ,y/Iy' �.. y 1•d�' ti t� , $ :--0; La Y., ti� r 11 jII ) I i ^ J D� •� TU.INOA_K LINT 'I 01 = .0 �' ° gl I X `01101 3 - :a: Z i •l JOI er p�J n •. � l � r b I 1 # - s,r J ♦ QI t✓ IP fP!V!O INIr N 5 _ - N Ot _t _� ( ( Q�In �I tl yl i'i'I '�I r�'� rn ii I H,, i •`r I v,.iIn1 G .1 `,11 ,1 y`� ~o Vj. O,P n� .-:�:.n W •T•t -110'Vlto q My`_yN N,_�11V V R �'. ♦ I! vl ? I �' I ill '� rD 1 C f:.•.r p �oai_pWO7Dt�le+i _9 Ilut. U ae'`�,' I ?!NI-I.Wt�-O+�-IJ I!NI� I I er �. �i IfI�IWIOIWIAI•�IN�O• 'S I' �{KY ..i I _ _ .._�. _, . I .� ) I I ,N�•.. QQ .:i .'N '�;T 0 _1 .w..�- .. —_J, w G .- f _� t,_. J. I r 1 O .i^, J .ra j -� -•---+ 014 I� 1 ' 7•) '•' I .,, 'f: I In '" i i:i i rn I m U (11 ' ,ti'. ♦ ♦ ? ... t�' r. ' , / ,I • ° - 1 ` ti Atp "' Min 'fit n p i I J ' r ] ,• _-1 II 1 O _i N _--� 11'1 L--L_L-.. 1._.. �• _ I -` y ' w ' _ '• 1_^zl 1. _• .._j4r .µ SnP_,`•'. ule w� I 1 C t• to O n t `= -- 89rNAVE.5_W - (D _, L1,+093= e�in - 1VF SIN • f Z ^ Z -- P^ AR 76�90'1 - =110 - PC. A n •ti -- -- yy _ t % p • '--- -- - - 't - - - -- --�� 46S L+7j,_--------'�•�1� --•$9Sk1.: AYE £r0:-- I , "- C Z 1 PO.T I')b • 90A3 S' F't') . 6t 1.1' Il-1 r09 �( t• �N(- ` ; e 1 . ' 40 i'-- --1 r, •i - c•::.T al, •,,, ... �Ic v Q I Clon'Flo1 t loo r or -�•� A b ab ! I r 1 1 1 \Yid IIJ 1 4 '- i h -1 .1 �-1, I 17 • o 1�I• LJ I t # N .m . I _ j_.... d. Lp 1�, o �! ^ 1 'I �-lni Y' Ul .:,� 'A'I Ii01 > Cti, f, F=-- � �,m 1 u � 1• _ 1 ,. C ' •'} 'v u � ' N ' N� W 'I' D F• O � s 1 i •rl I 1 �' �!i"-� �'--'--•?1 - --1 �..._-F.- 1, W�ll " D � 2 Cy � I I, I I � • I + I Y'� , , •_ � ' �• �• � �1/` `, 'f Nw,U. rl '•� ,I I 1 I '� a TJI I ♦ I I` • �,,� 11 1 �•q •-I1''11 1 I J ,, o o n I W rl n4'•f' ' ! I C i P Ot�j .. �• v �/� r' �- I > N 111 -� __ 'r S p� p I 'P Y 1! i ► •- i- I Icy Ir D n �I _ �. 5) $t Aim 5� _ - _ - _ _ • :92 t `, '�. .� •� ,,,fir Z7, -It • li •. •� •� � � � � TT T 1 1 • (/ � V"`�Zc1 I O� , L 1 j � � I � 1` ' *q4�� .� "�,•e"�; " m 1 ;� � �. 91 , r IT' , y l` d'7 I •S� , I r.e, J � I I � L�� __'• 1� .�I � S � � w Mi> I n�' ry I ^' I 'r `o r'D-,©�i-i�•� I c a•, �' I ^ P'li-'---rt?}-: lh+++++�� f- -( �,;. I, =4"�Gf.,tn+,I r I m aG^It{ I j f~�(•-4-0�1' '`� T�-i-+- A '� _ L;+.-� 1\ • MIIf; + IL. I c '�:t I \7 1 W vlrr� v •»4:-�: I • �i �f y� �� "�� ' i - = ` • •I ��Ippp �.It_'•�0./a • - _ _ 1 ui •• . h-= M1I•.ao el , II 10 " �s . !� -. _ L ` X I.499 I I I i i Io •, vw V¢lp1`� w l r1 I jIVN• V FL3 !1 I Il�l1, Y;T _ i N I a O �� �11` 1 d• P.T.AtdAith4 _. ..._ " 1.h 2 #TI u Y s' I• a 1 N W i P 1GT CE�Ot.iO L �� I U N ° Ir.' Io "' (vO' 1 u I �'I iI 1 ♦ �Zi --11' I , I N .,;N 1 ,, ,. ��'l) 360 L1 Yv, _,AK 4!8 Z��•0•.r ._-_-.,- I •�"vl•.NO �I ,w �n.?�,�"?�� •>t �. ;00�.�.��'`1.4�l�6 L .i ar• _--- - - +1 ��•� d5"C ^r1 YZ �. '. "46,- - ( NI.4S'E SZNO AVE So. •G rA' rr.. - - -1 -. ,;+;tea. - ���. •,b< �Q NI'.i5'30'E �...�(d4 Ltnts) E _ ��. 51•45'W _JO. r n s N 7 • A •E c•' ° lob'' ot,. r6 0 00 ' ♦ i 1 o n; # r. ,i , - ..0 r�t!y, .` r .'� .I � � �' s O V 'ti E !1� , � , �;'� `^^ i � o°' �� � \\q .�. ' •n _ � t1# •rL;J_ 1� ` � v• � ' Osp �oi tf ,'° N ..1 !^U' ��Iw f I p -- ' �, j`�fi!(, _� _ i D' i iD i•50� - J ` '1 _ nN- \ 1 c . _ f 0 H t I � �� � �l . N I,�i l� '�I� n ( � •� 1'y ,.. I I i 1_'1 �_ ._- .. __., ,r r rI V1 1 .. � 1 M.yt ` y '• \ O O P :.•'R^I �� ^ �, + n I \ qD ° �N 1i�II y!r t r 1 y v F to ► r I et O 1e C fi � � N O r W• IQ � \ ' „� C, It • 1 A r..J l��i JJ • - A `0`/ l,, �•�'ti F . `I•i �: r.. tl T '' P(i i t�0 1,372 m I A a li') • � �;. °. q �I t` j. (�� t L ir:�+�•�,`' M d < r� � ,.. I �t 1 �� f Z � -. � i � * E♦ - -x-_ � •� a � L' �•��oyc '�1+ 1 � y'_ W . ro •r• T.I P (` a•1/1r� ' _ P • \*% ro '�� m �9 ..•. e q i i� ~ - 1 ! `{ p�(�� 6 1 ( 0 * p r• 1 « I. "i ,rl.>t '+' ' /o Y J, �l t �f ��ao 'Y r, I ,I I 1 " �J � r; : � , 11'• I•, � •� � f�l- � ; I i•►a�� is i, I 1 �,o b z A Q 0 1'I n 1 •r (!I m I u i i yry�rT ♦ I Nlp o X IT rtJ�_ 4.1 Y, �- _ I II 3 IP '�+28 � - + / � -• I I •1'e .- - -__-_ i 3. 8 ' rrd_ _ {\v ,I•; ,5' ' • •'n V > v+ I 1 _ _"��'' '1) • - -.. / '� ' ^ z N b 3j .�0 3 c - j�p (� o � ^ < �. $ I 7Z'• 3, ' � ' e _ _ r Q � I w +�J - I TI KA nV " •; .n ^rA,: a I 9- ...✓'' 1! \i• d e . i J 1 `r° I , °° _ i .Q �'' o� '° 'o Z ! l#1 I 1 u'--'r• • r I•a0 ,9 T d 1, O ��, -'. f { ,� , O;'..1 1 .:ii" wry \ +. t• N �� , I _ !n \' I , Y •. --N ' ' r ` 9 3 m Zf �• •r1 tnl o,Y,hi� \o wY..y: \ O l�.utr� - t IX . 1>c �' '� It Eq ;� V v \.. 4 �S�11 o LAKE 5T, �Bj �94TH AVE. S� 0 m) 1♦ P A i 01, > r7l Iml ., e'I ('A •- I o, o ?� 3< •t a iN' u V' �' � 3 g � � l' .� i � � •� �'s � ?a 1 U` m � � I - _._.._ �_ --- --- O �.. _. �+.�.r•-��.. � ° ... Imo` _ z '� *31 wat O ,as S u _LFIT 94+8i1_,_- ty2-I :.1 _620• + j :F0�194+3]I Lt) m i ; I %,-��.AOM. V �aSTyS 0' 7 i i / )� ,••�.ti: r• ,�.�'. u. -: �.. ._�/ - %?�~..___ ��\x/J/i I tl �� i. rM 0 •V ^O y to 'L '� In O �.-- _'--_-Y" \7'' ( IN.�i T ' d v • V 8'+---NM{ON Mr ld N_ •} t •� Ot 'cr - o-----') I -I I ter. ► J c "t W REMTo NI.nY- i► : ' R; ° o {�ta� c a /iA�IL777N i 2 a Pam- N �; • .." -'I� I. I j 7a� * �- `1 0 � P ,,,, O 1• a • \ r t4 - °, /• d N �' m � r. 11' _, �ry l T I �>> IIr•, w �� • ►+ Fob tt1M1 sNr N, ct ° tN iv i-� �) Azl-_I tQ, _ N ,M _ o Ili G wdttt _ ,b' n 90 - 16oIt _ �. 1 > `• 9 T -I U •D 5T 6 TH AVE S. --! 1 y`� O -7 o NL1 .►S..E ERv1c_RoAo �± � �v �•} , _. � , ..t� - sNws�ut:Kar.t wrKw/t � P.T (•H ,��f i T i ; r tI oAi °``'Litt:; RentJnnet City Clerk Card File Page 1 of 1 C"; wer* "rd me Record 42 of 54 a 0 Title: RES 2682, I-405 WIDENING 87 Effective Date: Jan 1, 1987 Date Entered: Jun 15, 1987 by User: CC Date Modified: Sep 21, 1994 by User: CC4 Narrative: ■ RESOLUTION 2682 - Washington State Dept. of Transportation city joint projects with 1-405 HOV widening ■ 06/08/87 effective Keywords: ■ HOV PROJECTS 87 C� �i 8 y Mf c ro�1G ■ 1-405 �St�J� aw,��S 932�I Cw�v�rf" ■ WA TRANSPORTATION 87 Location: VAULT C d I-`` Ll4i ... Si-o ♦ eh I �i or1,r+ V�P`% 60 000 -rar c,,I vcr-V q`5 21 qt-7 Qq6 GtK ' 6A6- http://rentonnet.org/intranet/CityClerklindex.cfm?fuseaction=showdetail&REC=42&ID=44395 09/28/2004 YS Woshingto,-, 74� Departmen- -1 L: L c•.. "Z;.. _111+ (c;fv gw..) 5wo ,rigI,! . plli;lrll�l EXH I B I T'B" c.s 405 S.q - ra 6114�7 ......... Ay. .... ... 1. 1.... .. 8164 ....... . — ------ - SHEET. LOFA.S-Ul 1997 SCALE-.-,---- j - 12 w lk tij, c C.TVt DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS Washington State Department of Transportation SR 405 TUKWILA TO SOUTH RENTON NOV LANES K-12 _7 GRADING &DRAINAGE PLANS of f X4 1 A6 /2 I A 12 If I. L.na i sue,` I CkS4dG,� 74 \\\� I > ZI I IS e P 9 F EXHIBIT `B" /..743.........._.... s'z.40.. s2 4`7 1,aV GC 8164 r Z •_. ..,_; .:;.... Apr. � OiYtS1ON OF HIGHWAYS _G Washington State Vjg Department of Transportation SR qa TUKWILA TO SOUTH RENTON K-R HOV LANES w_cr GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS .- w of r , • " .�i'.' gi i # t. QE Fm u0 PRDj. biY1SI0N OF HIGHWSYC t' ! CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 2682 Washington State Department of Transportation City Joint Projects with I-405 NOV Widening WHEREAS the City of Renton, Washington, has heretofore made application for joint City of Renton and Washington State Department of Transportation funding and construction of facilities of importance to the � City in connection with the HOY widening of I-405, and WHEREAS the implementation of said projects requires the execution �s1, of certair, documents relating thereto including project agreements, r acceptance of p private easements, assumption of operation and maintenance, and ; the allocation and expenditure of City, State Department of Transportation, and Federal FHWA Funds, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, 00 RESOLVE ASc-c''° FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are hereby found to be true and -_ correct. SECTION 11: The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Renton, Washington, are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver unto J appropriate governmental agencies any and all documents relating to the acceptance of easements. City/State agreements, project agreements, maintenance ano operation agreements, and the allocation and expenditure of city, State Department of Transportation, and Federal FNWA Funds, including the following description, to -wit: ' Interstate I•AO5 NOV .,!Jen!n7: .Oakesdale Ave. S.W. street extension under I-405 fro^n S.W. Grady Way to S.W. 16th St. i .Lind Ave. S.W. widening over I-405 froon S.r. Grady may to S.N. 16th St. .Re«ton village storm intercepter from Renton village P1. S. to the Panther Creek Wetlands. .Soil Consetvatton Service P-1 3r,31nage Czannel unle. ➢-4;,5 frac, S.N. Grady way to S.W. 16th St. Plge t 001 RESOLL71ON NO. 2682 Said project includes certain flood control, drainage facilities, water and sanitary sewer facilities, bridge construction, street relocation and road widening improvements. SECTION III: The City Clerk is hereby authorized to certify this Resolution in sufficient copies and furnish same to the appropriate governmental agencies. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 8th day of June , 1987 Maxine E. Motor, CITY CLERK APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 8th day of June , 1987. Barbara V. ShlOpoch, MOOR Approved as to form: 0 0-�'vLawrence J. Narten, ATTORNEY Page 2 OF 2 tn. �.aEF:M� 0 0 0 c cD 0 m d W O 7 O 0 0 cD 0 n o_ ZJ CD 0 CD C� O cD 3 71 X N m CD 0 N ww wwrnrnrnrnrnrn rn rncncncn co law I wn�)cNn w cr o cwi, UTILITY IDENTIFIEF 6) W O CD 00 �I a) (.n W N ci W D 0o W N W O co N O m CD CD (n N O in in 0cn cocr% in W 00 0 i i cn � -� -i -i cn -i -{ cn --n UTILITY TYPE n -c� C� - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - n - o - 0 - 0000000000 - r. r. - r: - - r: - 0- 0 C) C� C� n 0 n n (� 0 0 -. 0 0 0 -. 0 -., 0 — 0 -., 0 -., 0 -�, • -., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z7Z7 XXXXXXXX Z7 -., ;UZ]Z7Zll — -., — -�, -„ — T1�7;U�] — -., — Z7Z7 �l Z] �7 ZJZ77�i] -. UTILITY OWNER (D (D cD 0 cD (D cD cD cD > m > m > m > cD cD cD cD cD cD cD m cD m cD m cD m cD cD m cD m cD > > > > 0 0 > > CD CD (D (D > > > CD (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > > 0 > > > 0 > > 0 > > > > � FRANCHISE J N N N A o 000 03 Ui Oo co NUMBER w w rn mow'' (DOG NUMBER) N N N N N N N N -� N N N + W N W W N W N N N HIGHWAY ornir -0,�I Awiv-�ooiD� W Cn CD Cn cn W O) O v, (D v,NN)"aK) cD cD cn W O) O 00N A v N �� —I CO o in "'aoo MILEPOST p p to 00 cn N ? ? LOCATION zz zZZZZZZz z ZzzZzzzzzT � ��� -0v -0T ��� C P'= POSSIBLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C� n C) 0 0 0 0 0 n n GON)=LIGTNC= i NO CONFLICT a PROTECTION I cn w I v l rn o �" � o o (In feet) RELOCATION ou w WETLAND AREA ono ra'v STREAM AREA AGREEMENT �KE3 u' z oC O 00 rni Arno �y nK0K5 rnrnmx z coID (D a(D a W (DD a o 0 0 v o (D (D l< o to a o o C� C (D o cD Lo O cp CC < Cn (D d (D a d 7 0. -„ C pnj (D (D 3 �' I O Z7 CD O CD (a a O 0 0 Cn c (D d (D N DJ O N tll O (o in W (D C'D (� (c y o (D N S W v Q p � (D O CD O (D (D O O C�D O n Z = O 00 N in (D Aa� D�Dc CD (D o �J CD p c 'fin CD o o (n (D a cn i4per) O .-� CD D d a Cn (D `< O -1 (O O Cr ' Op 0 O NLn -0 D S'd •J 0) �� N O CD Z 0 0 . T< 0 cD O o d Ln (A N v (a co -_. IN o '' d (D � — Cr O � a- 0 cD � o ^ � CD a � �. � � m z ,. `. o S. r. Ocy CDN N (ll � CD o p . J O �0�0 o Q o p P •. -. Co 0 � _ a (nNo� cn fll --I - v -0 o 0 O co' 0a c1 (1 o 0 _C Y . =• CD U, 0 C C a a =* o � C � cD co C 0 0 0 CL a) Q Z - a �- a -, CD - ?M (o =' a) o 0 a cn 0 (o x 7� (n -� (D CD 'n C rn °) cn cD a ° X COPY ON FILE Y T��� FILE NOT FOUND=NF 0 c m m Q 0 CD 0 CD 3 i 0 O m X cn Cn OOOOw Ln Cn cn A A NN A A N— A A -+Cn w W AwN(n W w N N CnAAAA N N N N N AAww N N N UTILITYI.DENTIFIE CD 00 v w A A O CD Ln -+ A Ln 00 — O CD 00 -I Cn -Al (D A UnCnCn�cn C() cn KKK KK KKK -i -iK�cn �-i -a cn cnKK� UTILITY TYPE 0 0 0 0 -., 0 0 -., 0 0 -., 0 -., 0 -., 0 0 -., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -�, -„ -., -'' UTILITY OWNER m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 00000 00 0000 0000 00000 0000 Ln Ln Ln T. FRANCHISE 00 co 00 0 co N U Mk3ER w co co 0 (DN (DOC NUMBER) 0) �-' -�� �Aw wwwww wN�N HIGHWAY Aww w� ruin ooN 4.- oow con ��°co w w��jo NN-4Orn oo0rv� OA 'co Cn MILEPOST LOCATION rV PC =POSSIBLE ZZZZZ z z ZZZZ ZZZZ ZZZZZ Z Z Z Z CONFLICT NC s NO CONFLICT PROTECTION °' I °' "' (in feet) RELOCATION WETLAND AREA STREAM -AREA AGREEMENT o nn cn n mocn CD(D C O O w'-0— CD CD c0 m 0 0 Cn 00 co O O 1:10 z E7 ; ; 3 c 0O n m (D CS 0_C rn m m cCDD 3 3 o ccn _ = Ln a o M D (c m �' N m 0 cD u (D c .Z.I not cn �zT n LnO N n N .0 N °_► c TI 0 0 7 0 T _�' o c o O m _C _ D D c CD Z •-j 3 O m CD ccnn v (n � 0 00 (a o OD O CD W � COPY ON FILE Y'';I> < iz -< FILE NOT FOUND=NF m 1 z mIr O L, III m y N II IN __4 ° o \' . .. - _ I _ ..-OP- -OP- -0 - 4.+ � 11' a b --o-- --o —� ,, ° ,: �•--v--—{—w—T--W ,--o---o---o--off w - Y �_- Y Y. „��' °.. 5 Iyl�.Y - - w - - Y O I h� o -I O m \ z m o i ST—STFi-ST ST u I � 1 1 , I L1 toi � I ,Ili , �,_ � _ �,�_• i I � I I I� I� 1• I` o \ c+ c� vl-y b-ILI&�—is—ls 'I 1\= \�$ r 1 y 1 ` •,\ • °.G '' `�',�+ IMP- : —. I .1 1 • t D S I ' ID °CD r- \ f F Dr z1 I c I _ 1 m `: I I I I� s �$ �° j , \ 1 1.h` 0 '� \ T: ST——sr=sT= W stM ST r W — — w w -++r w ram— Y AA" 0Br _js„ g:_- p.r._.!�.-. ° -- •e�,'`-9--�_ON4 ° L 1 I I I'1 � I .. -. a1 "'` y;y►-_ c_ "'P:M .•tl - 'ckT\`t��o • - r ---- t O 1 '� l t m 1 \ 4 _ a e - r.7 .— � � I � . r f r 1 -`OP- �flP--OP-a-OP--OP--OP14" 'W I .-g �_--� �__� =g= �-+ -_�_= --0- VA w - W 5:_ ST- -ST- - - - - =-wf. J .pI - --- s 1 —_ w--w --w — D O r mz� t D -i 1 at / 1 a r v7.7 I 11 1 1 v rn ---- — ° 1 04 1 , 1 j p ` �\ ;;� I / �/ / ° t I INI I I I � \\ \�� ff�� ��`� Ji•IC+. �•���M"-i i r 0 D �\. doAr— C, z mCn Co �n pi 0 10 0 a) k, Uy 0 N, 0 Win-r -0 0 5XII/P I A k/ - - 'I � W JL 0 J�. % -do- -do- -do- -da,- -,do- 0=d�-.0 w - lei 41 ip A w IIi -do -do- T_dQL- -.do- 7-4,0- _.E L 00m 4 S 3AYAWI A� �;u m C.. / , / i/-dO- -do- -4Q-,x-d0- -d �13 .7 W, 39 0 ISKA 4;t- 7,V 7k 150 I i III w - - 0 OP- p lie I 'lop v '34 N NON CID p 0 .- 1 0 z L4 I Z m LnrL� v /Z w W� 0 z 3C.gM --I C_ r, ).. = 0-4 CO- r.:v <;u M 19 w — — Vi 00*n m 0 rnz f-00 C) C I C000 r- 7,�'z CO 0 :74 'In 0< ON 0 (D t A TV S- �. rn vrn Cn — CC) t, V5� Z M N-4 J= J m z A. -,- -A OZI�rn3 Co W 0 0 C:> M 0 0 _u > z 0 rrI M Co > t z Z 0 x 'DCC— Cb MCA- -4-.4 GY _O0LW =rn ZZ Z) I -OP— _op— — I Lr, LA On 6 m �z 0z A 0 A, w — w qk ji NI d it T 0 P_ P_ 4 -OP- r ID C� 70 C, 0 > .... - C, � C _W C, NCOM -n -V Co C:-Lnc: J." % -h dD OM C) < 0 w 0 39 N.. JJ 6119 �,) I I C) OCJ• 91, s 'N \ I , ". . L, ps L 5 7 44, 0 %0 A ♦ +2�7' L Y vp 00 \V �. •� A. ,o > \+♦ • r r, l ip C. OC ��� • ` u, i i, .>� - .. �' nip^ \ e r °°�� �� I �f�•� tomv. CD cp � _ _ I• I j III / /,�'t, " /~y I ia3nl8 8V030 I—� ++ �--- ++— ►--�+----o+-----`�+`— lb Ln s 9 `g r sue\ mcnz �g onIF lk T T T p+ G \WP \ 111111 v 1 II ��^�g•P,�+�• I 1 8I I ��11 \ 1 � •,11� 1 `' � � � O ` �` '� � � 1 �� 111�p1 ` it ,1'�I'; \ � �\'�`• _ ;.: `,� q� ,I r ` I .�K•o�,,, LA W W � l _ -i f ®� w �� o \ = o 1 ~ N — o--o----o--o--o,--o— —o ee--0--0--0--0--0--0--0--0— I 31 = p m �Q xN TW--wrw—J � I w ;" 1 1 1� � 1 1 �2 Y,•�2 ..fit u`+� Y-YJ•1: ' ` µ,� 1 w — + LLB — a 9Z°bT I 1 �}I IWR s Fib i•l,'li I \ I I I _ _ �� N —M-' ! . y--w— �q.,."--"— —""y,�no•reN—�M--"— W - — — — W W — �_� M — '�1 — M — — M — — M — — M — L ! r _/ -=S .�i'a7'i'�`�'-5� SatSj•5.= �'�= '.SSA='" I AS RS,6Y 3I 1310H ,.;m,r� -- �7y- N3(16VO NO171IH LI•,G.IL, - L-1,'IL fib Ia. ij M-- M M M " M « J �W r M —" — — " M-� S° b5°91 3 If �FT—', I � I ! I I•n l I I I "� �� � h�l O N I O N V -1 WHO I = 1 'III �.�•} zsfs—�ts�—�� '� � -'- I , r l l I j rr I'Y I 11 Ti 31. I Iia t r _ LI 3Sb'Hd :831N30 E' I of ,I"I�� b; �OI_i30 ,13VA _.51V3T ICI 1 j 1 IH fa � 7,1 _ • i c�L II o, .1 I1M WSDOT - Project - I-405 - Renton - Slide Repair and Culvert Replacement Page 1 of 2 L V% VhwitlingtState � f Tr sportatkm WSDOT Projects I-405 - Renton - Slide Repair and Culvert Replacement Project Status i December 2007 Tri-State Construction crews have begun work to fix a sinkhole and replace a damaged culvert under I-405 in Renton. The sinkhole and culvert damage was caused by historic rainfall during the Dec. 3 storm. From Tuesday, Dec. 11 through Friday, Dec. 14, crews may close the right lane of northbound I-405 overnight between SR 167 and SR 169 in Renton for repairs. Around -the -clock right -lane closures could begin as early as Saturday, Dec. 15 and last up to two weeks while crews complete necessary repairs. WSDOT will keep the right lane open during the morning commute. We expect construction to take up to eight weeks. The new culvert will prevent a roadway failure in a storm. Crews will complete repairs to a damaged culvert beneath I-405 in Renton. See large__ project _map. Project Facts • During culvert installation Thunder Hills Creek will be diverted using a pumping Why is WSDOT completing emergency repairs to I-405 in station,.and three 24-inch pipes. Renton? • The temporary pipeline will carry On Dec. 3, heavyrainfall overwhelmed a culvert beneath I-405 in the creek along the northbound shoulder of I-405, to Talbot Road, Renton. The resulting rush of water created a sinkhole beneath the road underneath I-405, and into a surface, resulting in a collapse of a section of the culvert and wetland. threatening the stability of this section of the freeway. Crews have • The temporary pipeline will be 2000 feet long. made temporary repairs to fix the sinkhole, but permanent repairs must be made to replace the culvert to prevent significant damage to I-405 in the next storm. Work on the culvert replacement will occur in two stages. First, crews will install a pump and pipe system to divert Thunder Hills Creek away from the damaged culvert. Three 24-inch pipes will carry the creek along the northbound shoulder of I-405, on Talbot Road (SR 515) underneath I-405 and into a wetland. The work along the shoulder will require crews to close the northbound right lane intermittently for up to two weeks. Once the pipeline is installed, crews will then use a hydraulic jack to install a new culvert underneath I-405. This work will take up to six weeks, and will require overnight lane closures. The End Result We expect construction to last up to eight weeks. The new culvert will prevent a roadway failure in a storm. Project Benefits Safety: The repairs will stabilize the road for drivers and will protect against future flood damage that could threaten the stability of I-405. What is the project timeline? Crews expect to begin repairs as soon as Dec. 11. Repairs will take approximately eight weeks to complete. Public Involvement http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/1405/RentonCulvertReplacement 12/12/2007 I-405 Coordination City Design Team Meeting Meeting Agenda Conference Room 511 December 12, 2007 1:30-3:00 PM 1. I-405: I-5 to SR 169 Widening Project ("Nickel") Stage 1 Updates ✓a. Minutes from Meetings — City has requested for all meetings ✓ b. Traffic Control Submittals — being coordinated with Traffic Ops c. Design Pkg #8 RFC (HOT Lanes) — comments submitted Nov 27cn d. Design Pkg #5 Prelim (167 widening) — no comments submitted e. I-405-Preliminary Submittal — comments submitted Dec P. f. Stage 1 Prelim Hydraulic Report — comments submitted Dec 7'h g. SR 167 Final Design Package #5 — receipt expected Dec 171n. h. I-405 Final Design Submittal — receipt expected Dec 201n i. Clarion Hotel Flooding j. Holmes Electric Site — underground tank locations 2. Springbrook Wetland Mitigation Bank a. Update — Water Line Break, No update on warping b. Invoices — Resolution needed (Keith) for payment by end of year 3. I-405: Emergency Culvert Repair — Thunder Hills Creek a. Overview — Culvert collapse, sinkhole, media coverage, etc. b. Upcoming impacts to City — temporary emergency fix and permanent 011M 10 m' 15m 4. I-405: I-5 to SR 169 Widening Project ("Nickel") Stage 2 15 m a. Review of Draft RFP (includes draft plans, hydraulic report) — due Dec 181n b. Status of MOA and other agreements — review due Jan 3rd 5. Summary of Review Priorities a. Emergency Construction b. Stage 1 Construction c. Stage 2 Draft RFP d. Stage 2 MOA / Agreements 6. MOA I-405 Admin/Exec Meeting a. Meeting scheduled for December 20`n b. Advance briefing on Gypsy Creek agreement / status (Prfdr-m 1�«{,'� 7. Potential topics for next week's (Dec 18`n - Tuesday) WSDOT coordination Mtg to m 5m bn,.F G y� +AV PVV5AJ Wf� 5 m S-k`4 FOR INTE-RNA L DISCUSSION ONLY 1 GCA-XXXX 2 3 Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) 4 and the City of Renton 6 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT 7 For DESIGN and CONSTRUCTION of the 8 I-405/I-5 TO SR 169 STAGE 2 - WIDENING 9 AND SR 515 INTERCHANGE PROJECT 10 11 12 THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT for Design and Construction of the I-405/I-5 to 13 SR 169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project (the "AGREEMENT") is made and 14 entered into by the CITY OF RENTON (the "CITY") and the STATE OF- WASHINGTON, 15 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (the "STATE"), collectively referred to as the 16 "PARTIES" and individually referred to as "PARTY." -` 17 18 WHEREAS, the STATE, in the interest of providing congestion relief in the 1-405 19 Corridor, proposes improvements along I-405 within'the CITY in roject known as the I-405/ 20 I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project e "PROJECT"); and 21 22 WHEREAS, the proposed PROJECT will require the STATE to perform certain work on 23 the CITY's facilities; and" V, 24 25 WHEREAS, the STATE, Having secured, funding for the PROJECT, is willing to 26 undertake the construction of said PROJECT; and 27 28 WHEREAS, the cctstruct the PROJECT usin the desi n-build method of g g 29 project delivery; and 30 31 WHEREAS, the desi d method of project delivery is flexible and allows for the 32 development and finalization of a design after the contract is awarded, unlike the typical 33 design -bid -build method of project delivery; and 34 35 WHEREAS, the design of project elements in the design -build method of project 36 delivery moves faster than in the typical design -bid -build method of project delivery; therefore, 37 expedited CITY review of the design elements will be required; and 38 39 WHEREAS, the PARTIES understand that the PROJECT design will be finalized after 40 the contract is awarded; and 41 42 WHEREAS, the PARTIES executed a Memorandum of Understanding on September 43 27, 2004, that describes the PARTIES' cooperation during design and construction of the I-405 44 Congestion Relief & Transit Projects; and 45 Page 1 of 1614 GCA-XXXX Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of the I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 — Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project 12 / 12/200742 �."_007 Draft FOR INTERNAL DISCUSSION ONLY 46 WHEREAS, the PARTIES desire this AGREEMENT to define their roles and 47 responsibilities related to design and construction of the PROJECT; and 48 49 WHEREAS, the PARTIES recognize that future supplements or amendments to this 50 AGREEMENT, or other new agreements, may be necessary to record final design decisions and 51 define cost estimates related to the design and construction of the PROJECT. 52 53 NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 47.28.140 and 54 in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants, and performances contained herein, or 55 attached and incorporated and made a part hereof, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS 56 FOLLOWS: 57 58 1.0 GENERAL 59 ' 60 1.1 The STATE will construct the PROJECT improvements along the I-405 Corridor, the 61 general limits of which are described in Exhibit A and own in Exhibit B, attached 62 hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. 63 64 1.2 T The CITY and the Renton Administration Executive Con"hittee (R A/E C), consisting of 65 the CITY's Chief Administrative Officer and CITV"'AdminiWators as well as the 66 STATE's I-405 Project Director and senior staff, have had ongoing communication and 67 negotiations that have resulted in many design decisions for elements within the 68 PROJECT. Those elements are incorporatedinto this AGREEMENT, its supplements, 69 and/or amendments, or will be incorporated into contract or other related agreements for 70 this PROJECT. 71 72 2.0 ROLES 73 °'✓`owledge Ite into future 74 2.1 The PARTIES ac that STATE will enter contractual 75 agreement(s) with a design -build contractor (the "DESIGN -BUILDER") for design and 76 construction of the PROJECT. 77 78 2.2 The STATE agrees to encourage a partnering session including STATE staff, CITY staff, 79 and DESIGN -BUILDER staff to review coordination processes and to determine the 80 need for, or frequency of, continuing coordination meetings. 81 82 2.3 The STATE shall track all CITY communication requests. 83 84 2.4 The CITY Project Coordinator will be responsible for facilitating all PROJECT -related 85 communication between the STATE and CITY staff as well as expediting CITY review 86 of all PROJECT -related submittals. This coordination of efforts with the STATE will 87 take place via the STATE's I-405 Project Engineer. 88 89 2.5 The STATE's I-405 Project Engineer, or his/her designee, will be responsible for 90 facilitating all PROJECT -related communication between the CITY Project Coordinator 91 and STATE staff as well as providing PROJECT -related submittals to the CITY Project Page 2 of 1616 GCA-XXXX Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of the I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 — Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project 12/12,'200712:=_—,"20()7 Draft FOR INTERNAL DISCUSSION ONLY 92 Coordinator. This coordination of efforts with the CITY will take place via the CITY 93 Project Coordinator. 94 95 2.6 The STATE agrees to make presentations to the CITY when requested to do so by the 96 CITY. In addition, the STATE agrees to provide updates of the PROJECT to CITY staff 97 on a monthly basis. These updates will include the PROJECT's milestones and will be in 98 a format suitable for posting on the CITY website, or for inclusion in the CITY 99 newsletter. 100 101 2.7 The STATE will develop a Public Information Plan that will designate the STATE as the 102 primary source of PROJECT information to the public. In addition, the CITY and 103 STATE will continue coordinating outreach to the business community. 104 105 2.8 The PARTIES agree to fund, and be fully responsible for, their own respective costs 106 associated with staff time necessary to fulfill their roles and responsibilities as identified 107 in this AGREEMENT, except in the following case. 108F 109 2.8.1 The STATE agrees to fund CITY project coordinatz in activities for the length of this 110 AGREEMENT through a CITY Project Coordinator 111 112 2.8.2 The CITY Project Coordinator will serve as the CITY's PROJECT liaison beginning 113 with Notice to Proceed to the. DESIGN -BUILDER and Will be responsible for 114 expediting CITY review of PROJECT submittals. 115 116 2.8.3 The STATE shall only fund those hours worked by the CITY Project Coordinator 117 for coordination activities associatedth the PROJECT. 118<, 119 2.8.4 The PARTIESgm enter into; separate agreement outlining the details related to 120 scope of work and reimbursement for the CITY Project Coordinator. 121 122 3.0 REVIEW OF PROJECT= ELEMENTS 123 124 3.1 At preliminary, final, and Release for Construction (RFC) design development levels, the 125 STATE will provide the CITY with five (5) copies of documents for review of PROJECT 126 elements. PROJECT elements include, but are not limited to, design of CITY streets and 127 other associated CITY roadway elements, streetlights along CITY roadways, CITY street 128 detour routes, noise variance requests within the CITY limits, and right-of-way use 129 permits within the CITY limits. The CITY's review of these elements will be limited to 130 conformance with applicable CITY design standards, standard plans, codes, and policies 131 as of the PROJECT's Request for Proposals (RFP) issue date. 132 133 3.2 The STATE will review all requests from the DESIGN -BUILDER for completeness and 134 compliance with contract requirements prior to forwarding them to the CITY's Project 135 Coordinator for review. 136 Page 3 of 16 4i GCA-XXXX Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of the I-405/1-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 — Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project 1212/200712:=s.._2 47, Draft FOR INTERNAL DISCUSSION ONL Y 137 3.3 The STATE will work with its DESIGN -BUILDER to give the CITY as much advance 138 notice of upcoming and planned submittals as possible. 139 140 3.4 The PARTIES recognize the importance of timeliness in reviews, avoidance of delays, 141 and minimizing costs for the PROJECT, as well as the mutual benefit provided in 142 shortening plan and proposal review times. To that end, the CITY commits to reviewing 143 and returning submittals within a maximum of fourteen (14) calendar days, except for 144 certain permits and review periods defined in Renton Municipal Code (RMC) or the 145 seven (7) calendar days allowed for RFC reviews, as described below. 146 147 3.4.1 In the case of infrequent circumstances, such as CITY emergencies and extreme and 148 unusual weather conditions affecting the CITY's ability to perform normal functions, 149 or receipt of project submittals of unusual volume, complexity, or unexpected or 150 controversial content, the PARTIES recognize the challenge the CITY may have to 151 review and return submittals within the allotted review period. 152 153 3.4.2 The PARTIES agree that additional review days may be allowed if there is no created 154 delay or cost increase for the PROJECT. In these cases, the CITY will be responsible 155 for requesting approval from the STATE within the allotted review period and 156 articulating the cause for delay and sp&1fic additional calendar days needed for the 157 review. 158 159 3.4.2.1 The STATE will review the extended period request for consequences to the 160 design -build contract requirements, schedule, and cost. 161 162 3.4.2.2 The STATE will approve extensions if there is no risk created to the design- 163 build contract,.*-,,,,,_,,,, q 164 165 3.4.2.3 If the STATE is unable to approve additional review days, the STATE, at the 166 STATE's sole discretion, may proceed with the design -build contract without 167 the CITY's review comments so as to prevent any delays to the PROJECT due 168 to the CITY's reviews. 169 170 3.4.3 The RFC reviews are to confirm that all comments on the Final Design Submittals 171 have been addressed and are consistent with the comment resolution process agreed 172 upon. No additional information, other than to address comments made on the Final 173 Design Submittal by other reviewers, is to be expected. 174 175 4.0 DESIGN OF ELEMENTS WITHIN CITY JURISDICTION 176 177 4.1 All plans for the PROJECT will follow the STATE's Plans Preparation Manual. All 178 facilities within the I-405 limited access will use STATE design standards, except that the 179 Renton Municipal Code and Renton Standard Design Details, as of the PROJECT's 180 Request for Proposals issue date, will apply to plans for CITY streets within I-405 and 181 SR 515 limited access. 182 Page 4 of 1610 GCA-XXXX Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of the I405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 — Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project Draft FOR INTERNAL DISCUSSION ONLY 183 4.2 The PARTIES agree that the aesthetic treatments of the I-405 Master Plan compatible 184 elements listed in Sections 4.3 through 4.6 will conform to the guidelines described in the 185 I-405 Urban Design Criteria for the I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR 515 186 Interchange Project (the "UDC"), incorporated into this AGREEMENT by this reference. 187 The PARTIES understand that the engineering details of aesthetic elements identified in 188 the UDC are undergoing final review and that this review will not change the concepts 189 developed during the UDC process. 190 191 4.3 The PARTIES agree to the design of elements that are within the CITY's jurisdiction and 192 related to Benson Road within the PROJECT limits and the Benson Road Bridge over 193 I-405 as follows. 194 195 4.3.1 The Benson Road cross section will consist of twelve (12) foot through lanes and 196 turning lanes (when needed) at Eagle Crest Drive, a five (5) foot bike lane on each 197 side of the street, and a six (6) foot sidewalk on the west side of Benson Road, except 198 south of the Eagle Crest Drive sidewalk on the east. In addition, the crosswalk across 199 the Benson Road intersection at the south side of Eagle Crest Drive will feature wheel 200 chair accessible ramps at both ends of the crosswalk. . 201 202 4.3.2 The sidewalk on Benson Road Bridge will incorporate the treatments described in the 203 UDC. The sidewalk off, and within 50 feet of, the bridge will incorporate the 204 transitional sidewalk treatment described in the UDC. Sidewalk beyond 50 feet of the 205 transitional sidewalk treatment shall be standard sidewalk, as detailed in the City of 206 Renton Plans for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction that are in effect at the 207 time of the PROJECT's RFP issue date. 208 209 4.3.3 Luminaires on Benson Road Bridge will incorporate the treatments described in the 210 UDC. Standard luminaires will be used off the Benson Road Bridge. Lighting will 211 meet the requirements outlined in RMC X.X.X. for a minor arterial in residential 212 zoning. 213 214 4.3.4 The overpass pedestrian fencing handrails on Benson Road Bridge will incorporate 215 the bridge fencing panel treatment described in the UDC. The overpass pedestrian 216 fencing handrails off, and within 50 feet of, the bridge will incorporate the transition 217 fencing panel treatment described in the UDC. The bridge railing similar to that 218 described in the WSDOT Bridge Design Manual will be used on retaining walls 219 outside these limits, as appropriate. 220 221 4.3.5 The Benson Road pavement section shall be 0.6 feet Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Class 222 '/z-inch, PG 64-22 and 0.35 feet Crush Surfacing Base Course (CSBC). 223 224 4.3.6 The design and posted speed of Benson Road will be 35 miles per hour. 225 226 4.3.7 Include language here from the DR regarding movement of the historical marker on 227 Benson Road. 228 Page 5 of 16.16 GCA-XXXX Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of the I-405/1-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 — Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project 12,112i20071 - i")7 Draft FOR INTERNAL DISCUSSION ONLY 229 4.4 The PARTIES agree to the design of elements that are within the CITY's jurisdiction and 230 related to SR 515 as follows. 231 232 4.4.1 The sidewalk located north of the 1-405 off -ramp on SR 515 and along Renton 233 Village Place will incorporate standard finishes described in the City of Renton Plans 234 for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction that are in effect at the time of the 235 PROJECT's RFP issue date. 236 237 4.4.2 The sidewalk located between Puget Drive and Renton Village Place on SR 515 will 238 incorporate the transition sidewalk paving detail treatment described in the UDC. 239 240 4.4.3 Sidewalk removed between the ramp terminals by the STATE's DESIGN -BUILDER 241 as part of PROJECT construction will be replaced with sidewalks incorporating the 242 transition sidewalk paving detail treatment. 243 244 4.4.4 The sidewalk located south of Puget Drive South on SR 515 will incorporate standard 245 finishes described in the City of Renton Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and 246 Municipal Construction. 247 248 4.4.5 Emergency access to the north access of Renton Plaza (south of 1-405 and east of SR 249 515 at approximately Highway Engineer's Station 17+00) will be maintained from 250 both northbound and southbound.SR 515, while general use access from SR,515 will 251 be restricted to right in/right out. Features to allow emergency access will include 252 mountable curbs, flexible pylons, or anbther method acceptable to the PARTIES that 253 allows access for emergency vehicles but deters general use. 254 255 4.4.6 Non -motorized facilities on°SR 515 are limited to only the following elements. 256" 257 4.4.6.1 Six (6) *wide t, wide sidewalks on both sides of SR 515. 258 259 4.4.6.2 A crosswalk at,,,4,,Iegs of the SR 515/Puget Drive intersection, except for the 260 north leg on SR 515. 261 262 4.4.6.3 A crosswalk at all legs of the SR 515/Renton Village Place intersection, except 263 for the south leg of SR 515. 264 265 4.4.6.4 A crosswalk only on the east leg of the SR 515/on-ramp to northbound I-405 266 intersection. 267 268 4.4.6.5 A crosswalk across the Renton Plaza access along the east side of SR 515. 269 270 4.4.7 Due to existing physical constraints along SR 515, landscape strips will not be 271 provided. However, the STATE's DESIGN -BUILDER will incorporate landscape 272 strips, minimum width of four (4) feet, along SR 515, as outlined in RMC X.X.X, 273 when needed. 274 Page 6 of 1616 GCA-XXXX Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of the 1-405/1-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 — Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project 12%12i"20071' 300 Draft FOR INTERNAL DISCUSSION ONLY 275 4.5 The PARTIES agree to the design of elements that are within the CITY's jurisdiction and 276 related to Renton Village Place as follows: 277 278 4.5.1 The design and posted speed of Renton Village Place will be 25 miles per hour. 279 280 4.5.2 The Renton Village Place pavement section shall be 0.6 feet HMA Class 1/2-inch, PG 281 64-22 and 0.35 feet CSBC. 282 283 4.5.3 The sidewalk located along Renton Village Place will incorporate standard finishes 284 described in the City of Renton Plans for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction 285 that are in effect at the time of the PROJECT's RFP issue date. 286 287 4.6 Treatment of retaining walls constructed by the PROJECT will be finished as outlined in 288 the UDC. 289 290 4.7 Noise walls constructed by the PROJECT will be finished with the ashlar stone block 291 pattern treatment on the neighborhood side and the standard fractured fin treatment on the 292 I-405 Corridor side, as described in the UDC. 293 294 4.8 If the STATE's DESIGN -BUILDER proposes a design charge to an existing CITY 295 facility such as a CITY street, sidewalk, trail, streetlight, or.traffic signal, the STATE 296 ` -agrees to present the change to the CIT for review: 297 298 4:9 If the CITY proposes a change torn existing CITY facility within the PROJECT limits, 299 the CITY shall request a ting 'Hough the STATE's I-405 Project Engineer. 300� 301 4.9.1 The PARTIES a m in acooperative spirit to review and discuss the 302 proposed ch 303 304 4.9.2 If the STATE detetmine�he proposed change to be feasible and appropriate, the 305 PARTIES shall neg¢te the responsibilities for payment of costs associated with the 306 requested change based on the benefits of the proposed change to each PARTY. 307 308 4.9.3 If the PARTIES can mutually agree on payment responsibilities, the STATE will 309 implement the change. 310 311 4.9.4 The consideration of potential schedule delays, which may result in additional cost, 312 shall be of paramount importance to both PARTIES, with reducing cost as the 313 primary goal and acknowledged mutual benefit. 314 315 4.10 The STATE will provide the CITY with plans of any changes to the CITY facilities 316 identified above in Section 48 for review. These reviews will be conducted in 317 accordance with Section 3.0 of this AGREEMENT. 318 319 5.0 CITY OWNED UTILITIES 320 Page 7 of 1646 GCA-XXXX Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of the I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 — Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project 13' 12.1`200712 ::&.'N47 Draft FOR INTERNAL DISCUSSION ONLY 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340. 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 5.1 Any protection or relocation of CITY utilities required by the construction of the PROJECT will be covered under a separate agreement. 5.2 All existing hydrants for fire protection on I-405, SR 515, and Benson Road that are removed to accommodate PROJECT improvements shall be replaced. No additional hydrants are required for the PROJECT. 6.0 STORM DRAINAGE 6.1 The STATE, working with its DESIGN -BUILDER, shall provide a Hydraulic Report that will include hydrologic/hydraulic analysis of water quality/detention facilities and conveyance systems that convey runoff through the PROJECT site and discharge to downstream systems, streams wetlands, and rivers. This report will discuss downstream analysis. 6.2 Drainage facilities that convey runoff from offsite areas andd1 ar e PROJECT runoff to downstream systems will meet STATE ow controlian 9wn tream analysis requirements, which are deemed to bey 1' -9 the CITY stormwater design standards and protect against the degradationf c�lo'wnstrean flooding conditions. 6.3 In addition to the STATE flow control re facilities will not increase the existing on downstream of the PROJECT. This will discussed in Section 6.1. the design shall verify that detention (100) year storm event- peak flow rate anted in the Hydraulic Report 6.4 The STATE, working with its DESIGN -BUILDER, will assure that stormwater management facilities tl t�i " "duce new open water areas within ten thousand (10,000) feet of the Renton Mu I , 1 are designed according to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advis Circular 150/5200-33, and grading of these facilities shall be coordinated with th nited States Department of Agriculture and FAA. 6.5 PROJECT documentation that demonstrates compliance with Sections 6.1 through 6.4 shall be submitted in sufficient time to allow the CITY a minimum of fourteen (14) calendar days to review and provide comments. 7.0 TRAFFIC SIGNALS 7.1 Traffic signal design, maintenance, and operations required by construction of the PROJECT will be covered under a separate agreement. 8.0 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND DETOUR PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS ON CITY STREETS 8.1 The STATE, working with its DESIGN -BUILDER, shall submit proposed road and trail closures, detours, and traffic control plans involving CITY streets to the CITY's Public Works Department for approval at least three (3) weeks prior to proposed closures. The Page 8 of 1616 GCA-XXXX Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of the 1 405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 — Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project 12112/200712.,�;-2.�}07 Draft FOR INTERNAL DISCUSSION ONLY 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 CITY shall review each submittal and return it to the STATE within fourteen (14) calendar days after receipt of plans, indicating either "approved," "approved with comments," or "not approved, contractor to revise and resubmit." 8.2 The CITY agrees to pre -approve two (2) weekend closures of Benson Road from 10 p.m. on a Friday night until 5 a.m. the following Monday morning within the PROJECT area subject to the stated time restrictions below. 8.2.1 Except during Renton River Days, IKEA weekend sale events, and between the third Thursday in November and the second day in January, the CITY agrees to allow the STATE's DESIGN -BUILDER to close a ramp, highway lane, or any lane of a local road between the hours of 10 p.m. and 5 a.m. 8.2.2 Unless otherwise approved by the CITY, the STATE's DESIGN -BUILDER will not be allowed to close a ramp, highway lane, or any lane of a local road between the hours of 5 a.m. and 10 p.m. during Renton River Days, IKEA weekend sale events, and between the third Thursday in November and the second day in January. 8.3 The STATE shall notify the CITY emergency services on the 9-1>;>-1 line 24 hours prior to any 1-405 lane closures. 8.4 Closures of local roads less than 24 hours, subject to the time restrictions in Section 7.3 and 7.4, will not require CITY Council action: 9.0 WORK WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT=OF-WAY 9.1 The STATE will notify the CITY fourteen (14) calendar days in advance of any work within the CITY right-of-way. 9.2 The CITY may provide an inspector, at the CITY's expense, to ensure proper compliance with CITY requirements for CITY -owned elements of the PROJECT located within the CITY owned right-of-way or in areas to be turned back. 9.2.1 The CITY inspector shall advise the I-405 Project Engineer of any non-compliance issues within XX days. 9.2.2 The CITY inspector shall communicate with the DESIGN -BUILDER through the STATE's I-405 Project Engineer and will follow the DESIGN -BUILDER protocols when visiting the PROJECT site. 9.3 PROJECT plantings within the CITY right-of-way shall conform to the CITY's Critical Areas Ordinance and the guidelines outlined in the UDC. The STATE will provide plant establishment for PROJECT plantings within the CITY right-of-way for three (3) years. 10.0 WORK WITHIN AND/OR OVER THE CITY AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA Page 9 of .1616 GCA-XXXX Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of the 1-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 — Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project 1-2/ 12/20071 ' c� 20071 Draft FOR INTERNAL DISCUSSION ONL Y 413 10.1 The PROJECT will have work within and/or over the CITY Aquifer Protection Area 414 Zones 1 and 2. 415 416 10.2 All construction within and/or over the CITY Aquifer Protection Area Zones 1 and 2 417 shall comply with the Washington State Wellhead Protection Requirements outlined in 418 Washington Administrative Code 246-290-135(4) and in RMC 4-3-050, 4-4-030, and 419 4-9-015. 420 421 11.0 PERMITS 422 423 11.1 The STATE, and/or its DESIGN -BUILDER, shall apply for and obtain all necessary 424 permits for work within the corporate limits of the CITY and regulated by the CITY, 425 including, but not limited to, the following. 426 427 11.1.1 Exceptions to the hours for development activity (per Renton Municipal Code). 428 429 11.1.2 Noise variance approvals (per Renton Municipal Code), except XXX noise variances 430 pre -approved by the CITY. 431 ., 432 11.1.3 Public works permit, which includes all road construction work within the CITY's 433 right-of-way, including but not limited to, review of proposed road closures, and 434 design and construction'of local road sidewalks, curbs, driveway curb cuts,: pavement 435 sections, temporary construction agreements, noise walls, and easements. 436 437 11.2 The CITY shall review each permit submittal and return it to the STATE within a 438 maximum of ten (10) calendar days after receipt of each submittal, except for certain 439 permits and review periods defined in the Renton Municipal Code and other exceptions 440 outlined in Section 3.4, and will indicate either "approved," "approved with comments," 441 or "not approved;°cto tractor to revise and resubmit." 442 ., 443 12.0 DISPUTES h 444 445 12.1 In the event that issues arise that are not addressed in this AGREEMENT, the CITY and 446 STATE agree to work quickly and collaboratively to determine a resolution using the 447 following guidelines at the lowest organizational level. 448 449 12.2 The process to informally resolve the situation shall proceed in the following order. 450 451 12.2.1 The CITY's Project Coordinator and the STATE's I-405 Project Engineer shall 452 jointly cooperate to informally resolve any disputes as quickly and efficiently as 453 possible. 454 455 12.2.2 If dispute resolution is not successful at the level described above, the CITY's Deputy 456 Planning, Building, and Public Works Administrator - Transportation and the 457 STATE's I-405 Construction Manager shall jointly cooperate to informally resolve Page 10 of 1616 GCA-XXXX Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of the I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 — Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project 12/ 12.-200712�'5:=2 jg-7 Draft FOR INTERNAL DISCUSSION ONLY 458 any dispute. 459 460 12.2.3 If dispute resolution is still not successful, the CITY's Planning, Building, and Public 461 Works Administrator, and the STATE's I-405 Deputy Project Director shall jointly 462 cooperate to informally resolve any dispute. 463 464 12.2.4 If the dispute cannot be resolved at any of the levels above, the CITY's Chief 465 Administrative Officer and the STATE's I-405 Project Director shall jointly 466 cooperate to informally resolve any dispute. 467 468 12.3 If unresolved, the CITY's Public Works Administrator and the STATE's 1-405 Project 469 Director shall notify each other in writing of any dispute needing resolution. They shall 470 meet together with appropriate staff from the CITY and STATE, within three (3) business 471 days of receiving the written notice in order to resolve the dispute to the satisfaction of 472 both PARTIES. Each PARTY agrees to compromise to the fullest extent possible in 473 resolving the dispute in order to avoid delays and minimize PROJECT costs. 474 475 12.4 If still unresolved, the CITY's Public Works Administl or and the STATE's I-405 476 Project Director shall each appoint a member to a dispute °, olution panel. These two 477 members shall select a third member not affiliated with either PARTY. The decision 478 made by this panel shall be final and binding on the PARTIES to this AGREEMENT. 479 The STATE and the CITY shall eachpay>fifty (50) percent of the costs for the third 480 member of the dispute resolution panel. 481 482 13.0 �1a INDEMNIFICATION `II D HM MLESS 483 484 485 13.1 Each PARTY shall ect, de f d, indemnify, and save harmless the other PARTY, its officials and agents, while acting within the scope of their officers, ployees, 486 employment as such, from any and all costs, claims, judgments, and/or awards of 487 damages (both to persons and/or property), arising out of, or in any way resulting from, 488 each of the PARTY' S own,,,acts or omissions. No PARTY will be required to indemnify, 489 defend, or save harmless the other PARTY if the claim, suit, or action for injuries, death, 490 or damages (both to persons and/or property) is caused by the sole negligence of the other 491 PARTY, its officers, officials, employees, and agents, while acting within the scope of 492 their employment as such. Where such claims, suits, or actions result from the 493 concurrent negligence of the PARTIES, the indemnity provided herein shall be valid and 494 enforceable only to the extent of a PARTY'S own negligence. 495 496 13.2 The STATE and the CITY agree that their obligations under this Section extend to any 497 claim, demand, and/or cause of action brought by, or on behalf of, any of its employees 498 or agents. For this purpose, the PARTIES, by mutual negotiation, hereby waive, with 499 respect to the other PARTY only, any immunity that would otherwise be available 500 against such claims under the Industrial Insurance provisions of Title 51 RCW. 501 502 13.3 In the event either PARTY incurs any judgment, award, and/or cost arising herefrom, 503 including attorneys' fees, to enforce the provisions of this Section, all such fees, Page I 1 of 1616 GCA-XXXX Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of the I405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 — Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project 12/ 12/200712;:_5:Q-W)+ Draft FOR INTERNAL DISCUSSION ONLY 504 expenses, and costs shall be recoverable from the other PARTY. 505 506 13.4 This indemnification and waiver shall survive the termination of this AGREEMENT. 507 508 14.0 AMENDMENT 509 510 14.1 Either PARTY may request modifications to this AGREEMENT. Such modifications 511 shall be mutually agreed upon by written amendments and/or supplements to this 512 AGREEMENT. No variation or alteration of the terms of this AGREEMENT shall be 513 valid unless made in writing and signed by authorized representatives of the PARTIES 514 hereto. 515 516 15.0 ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN 517 ' 518 15.1 This AGREEMENT contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the PARTIES 519 to this AGREEMENT. No other understanding, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject 520 matter of this AGREEMENT shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the PARTIES 521 hereto. k° 522 523 16.0 3 .,a GOVERNANCE° 524 525 16.1 This AGREEMENT is entered into pursuant to, and under the authority granted by, the 526 laws of the State of Washington and applicable federal laws. The provisions of this 527 AGREEMENT shall be construed to conform to those laws. 528 529 17.0 EFFECTIVENESS AND DURATION 530 531 17.1 This AGREEMENT— is effective upon execution by both PARTIES and shall remain in 532 effect through the PROJECT construction contract. 533 534 18.0 SEVERABILITY 535 536 18.1 If any provision of this AGREEMENT, or any provision of any document incorporated 537 by reference, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of 538 this AGREEMENT that can be given effect without the invalid provision, if such 539 remainder conforms to the requirements of applicable law and the fundamental purpose 540 of this AGREEMENT, and to this end the provisions of this AGREEMENT are declared 541 to be severable. 542 543 19.0 TERMINATION 544 545 19.1 This AGREEMENT may be terminated by either PARTY with sixty (60) calendar days' 546 notice and the written mutual consent of both PARTIES. 547 548 20.0 VENUE 549 Page 12 of 1616 GCA-XXXX Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of the I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 — Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project 12/ 12 /200712-,::.-: (.}07 Draft FOR INTERNAL DISCUSSION ONLY 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 20.1 In the event that either PARTY deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or obligation under this AGREEMENT, the PARTIES hereto agree that any such action or proceeding shall be brought in the superior court situated in Thurston County, Washington, and only upon exhaustion of the dispute resolution process outlined in Section 11 of this AGREEMENT. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the latest date written below: CITY OF RENTON STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By: By: Kathy Keolker Kim Henry Mayor I-405 Project Director Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM By (print): Signature: City Attorney Date: ATTEST: IM By (print): Signature: Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General Date: Page 13 of 1616 GCA-XXXX Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of the I-405/1-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 — Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project 12/12/2007.12:='5,N07 Draft FOR INTERNAL DISCUSSION ONLY 596 Bonnie I.'`Walton 597 City Clerk 598 599 600 601 Date: 602 41 „ Page 14 of 1616 GCA-XXXX Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of the 1-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 — Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project 12/12/2007122/5,207 Draft FOR INTERNAL DISCUSSION ONLY 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 EXHIBIT A GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPITON As part of the PROJECT, the STATE will add one (1) lane in each direction on I-405. The PROJECT improvements also include: • An I-405 northbound auxiliary lane from the SR 167 on -connection to the SR 169 off - connection; • An I-405 southbound auxiliary lane from the SR 169 on -connection to the southbound SR 167 off -connection; • Reconstruction of Benson Road from just south of I-405 north to almost Renton City Hall (from approximately Highway Engineer's Station 15+00 to 41+00), including the bridge where Benson Road crosses over I-405 to accommodate current and future I-405 widening; • A new on -ramp from SR 515 to northbound I-405 and a new off -ramp from southbound I-405 to SR 515; • An additional metered lane on the SR 169, to southbound I-405 on -ramp; and • Intersection improvements I-405 off -ramp terminus. The additional lanes on I • Using non- 515-:;between South Puget Drive and the southbound V as follows: widths; Widening the I-405 bridgti er SR 515 on the north side by approximately three (3) feet; and • Adding I-405 lanes without widening or rebuilding the Cedar Avenue and Renton Avenue bridges over I-405, or the I-405 bridges over SR 167, the Cedar River, and SR 169. Page 15 of 1616 GCA-XXXX Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of the 1 405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 — Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project 12.121,1200712=:5:=.24}()- Draft FOR INTERNAL DISCUSSION ONLY 638 639 640 641 EXHIBIT B PROJECT OVERVIEW I-405/1-5 TO SR 169 STAGE 2 - WIDENING AND SR 515 INTERCHANGE NEW SS 140570 SR 515 OFF4tAMP MP 4.00 SECOND METERED LAME ADDED TO ON -RAMP MP "U5 - RENTON AVE S CEDAR AVENUE S --. —NEWSR SIS TO NS 1-405 ON -RAMP NEW BENSON ROAD STRUCTURE OVER 1-4C5 Page 16 of 16 [6 GCA-XXXX Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of the I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 — Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project 12/12/2007415',200-7 Draft Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects Memorandum • 2.20 PAVEMENT MARKING ■ 2.21 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ■ 2.22 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC (MOT) ■ 2.23 INTENTIONALLY OMITTED ■ 2.24 RIGHT-OF-WAY ■ 2.25 CONTROL OF MATERIALS ■ 2.26 INTENTIONALLY OMITTED ■ 2.27 MINORITY AND WOMEN'S BUSINESS ENTERPRISES (MWBE) GOALS ■ 2.28 DESIGN -BUILD QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS ■ 2.29 MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION ■ 2.30 PRODUCT WARRANTY PROVISIONS Appendix Al contains a comprehensive list of the documents available for review and the contract status of each (contract, basic configuration, or reference). The Appendices are mainly to assist in your review of the RFP text. The Appendices also open to comment in this review are: ■ Appendix Al: RFP Documents ■ Appendx B2: Special Provisions (Runlist included) ■ Appendix H1: Preliminary Hydraulic Report (Appendix K of the report only) ■ Appendix J3: Pavement Design Memorandum ■ Appendix L1: 1-405 Urban Design Criteria for the Stage 2 Project ■ Appendix Ml: Conceptual Plans ■ Appendix 03: DDP Checklist • Appendix 04: Design Parameter Forms ■ Appendix U2: Utility Listing ■ Appendix Y2: Public Involvement Plan Comment Format Comments should be entered into the excel spreadsheet comment form. The form is included on the DVD and will be emailed to you. When you fill out the comment form, you can assist us in addressing comments in a short amount of time by numbering your comments consecutively, selecting the appropriate section, and inputting page and line numbers. Please fill in the comment number, section number, page number, and line number. Please fill out the header with your information. When finished with your review, please attach the comment spreadsheet to an email and send to: Barrett Hanson at: barrett.hanson(a)1405.wsdot.wa.gov. Review Period The comment review period is from December 4th through December 18th. Comments must be submitted no later than close of business, December 18th. Comment review meetings will be arranged as appropriate, depending on the nature of the comments. Final comment responses will be emailed out to reviewers after the comment resolution process. Future Reviews This review will be your last chance to make meaningful comment on this RFP. The RT comments will be addressed and then a Final Package review will be held. The final package review will be an 1-405 Team internal review to catch minor issues. Thank you in advance for your efforts! � Washington State Department of Transportation Page 3 of 3 Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects Memorandum Roundtable Review Purpose Roundtable reviews are performed to solicit, review, and resolve comments and concerns from the 1-405 Team, WSDOT (UCO, NWR, and HQ), and agencies that have local jurisdiction over a design package. The reviews confirm that the deliverables are in accordance with the design criteria and that they meet the intent of the project. A large amount of information has been made available for your review. To make the most efficient use of time, we are asking that you focus your efforts on the discipline for which you were selected to review this package. This should include a thorough review of your discipline's RFP text and design sheets, and a review of the other discipline's plan sheets for compatibility issues with your specific discipline design. Generally, your efforts are not required in reviewing the technical competence of other discipline text and sheets —only how the RFP and plans fit together. For example, a drainage reviewer should thoroughly review the drainage sheets, hydrology report, and RFP text. He/she should then look to see how the roadway, retaining walls, traffic signs, etc. work with the drainage plan — are there conflicts or unresolved coordination issues? Review Documents and Available Format Due to the large amount of information for review and the number of reviewers, we will be only be providing the electronic data in PDF format. For the 1-405 Team members, the PDFs are available on the network here: M:\Eng\515-STG2\RFP\Renton_Stage2_Barrett\C—Roundtable_Review\PDF—RR Each Non 1-405 team reviewer has received a DVD including: ■ Chapter 1 • Chapter 2 • Appendices ■ RT Comment Form The following is a list of the Chapter 2 Technical Requirements sections. ■ 2.1 GENERAL INFORMATION ■ 2.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ■ 2.3 STATE TAXES ■ 2.4 DESIGN DEVIATIONS ■ 2.5 SURVEYS AND MAPPING ■ 2.6 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN ■ 2.7 PAVEMENT ■ 2.8 ENVIRONMENTAL ■ 2.9 PUBLIC INFORMATION ■ 2.10 UTILITIES AND RELOCATION AGREEMENTS ■ 2.11 ROADWAY DESIGN AND GRADING ■ 2.12 PLANS PREPARATION AND PROJECT DOCUMENTATION ■ 2.13 BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES ■ 2.14 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ■ 2.15 ROADSIDE RESTORATION DESIGN (LANDSCAPING AND AESTHETICS) • 2.16 ILLUMINATION ■ 2.17 TRAFFIC SIGNALS ■ 2.18 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) ■ 2.19 SIGNING MrWashingtonState Department of Transportation Page 2 of 3 3 0 0 m(D m H m m 41. z 0 0 cn z 0 0 0 -a 0 ni (u a (D '0 m (D(Dm c(D m X 0 = =3 =3 mo o � o O O 2 y (D ,nr m W o o 0 Z 3 to 0) cn, 4�, c,)I N, O 3= CD O cn cn X r a: CF) CY) CY) CD Q n CD z (D r I �• l O o �' 0 (of 3_ o— o o 0) X m� m o 5' 'Ds O — cn 3 o s o� - a �' �. v° `� 3 o m �' m ° 3 c�i m �' m 10 n v Z) v ' a o `< a 3 v v m 3 0 �• n. v O� 2 o• °C_ (D ° 0° (° 0' ° (D M CD 7 N t0 O (D .0 c < n (D n O CD 10 0 v v 3' 0 `< o �' m CL CD m � E5• n v -�. 3. � o n(D< — m 0 3 (a am m CC m 3° v 10 ° o� 3 v `� o m < N � __. cn N < 7c (D ° O Cn O N (D (p (D n (n a (o — c (D c (D =� * n mo 0. CD ° fD < cn Q 0 0 is `� v — CD v = � a. ci x °' _, a, — E m a iD l< = _3 �'cr (n C' m o m �' m m o m :3 v 3 0 v� °'. 3 c-� r wCL 0 cD CD o w (D CD M_ v n ° 3 col �' 3 ° o0 'oX" o o m �' W 3 N ((DD � (fl ((DD n. � Q N Q S� (D O Q C 0 N 7 m :-. _ N v 0 O0 . � ((DD. 7 7 f� * D (D N L �< 2) �• CD Q N� v m CD m a CD 3 m _ ° CD CDC �. L (D (D c = Q C) N _ 3 n C n O WCL '* m N m O 0 N 11 Z7 O su CL m m = rt N O X CD .Z1 rt S �D S a O O O N m fD m 0 7 m N (D � O m o o m 0 -4 — n W o v C N O 0 3 Q 3 m m r ' m N m z ocli q � D `D u X n or O Ci o O 3 3 Q O a fD C 0 0- CD CD' z O 0 O O N co Q C A n CD (D CD (D C :3 :3 n G CD y CD cD O c o z 3 CA o cp cw v O �, O 0 = c rn cn W, a 0, cn C y — W 03 N W m Cn to W W C. CD <D o m o-�Dm �eOv 6S: U)m �v n6=•n m � �"2 O v v Ln rn m v, =<< v s CD cQ o_ v o Z) o m. Q S (D ry O_ S (D n, W 'G n• 7 (D � S C7 Q O O ID 3. (a O O M O W n C O C O OCD U) g = y co a C� c m v rn v a °).', F) m <CC y J 3 n' O• `G N v CD "a S `< j '06 Q Q- a OO_ N c� O N o< (D N <D CD & 3 v N O O '� 0 `< (D 3 X cn N 00 (D c S. c- CD EZ (CD 7. X. n Q— O C O_ (n D �• 6— 3 C O• fn 0 0 ''�CD (D O Q (o 7. v v n o o o o v 0 3 o `� Q o co CD O zy o a ! m c CL S � cD ni � a U,' -• (D m -. �. O o N < cD `G CD �' CD n CD O CD N 7c — (D = 7 N N n— N 0 CD 0-N �, N O n (D CD C CD M X 0 C O O O= 7 6 C S O C 0 O < N O O (D S O (D 0_ `< 3— C• 7 n. 0 7• X o X S 0 v Q �. a, (n � cn to Q a O n 6 CD 3' m CD o 3 Q co O o m CD! w 0 m Q 0- v m �. -a 'D 3 O m w C. co -n �. C a, co 0 3 � c m < < co CD o m(D o X, LD. m CD v, �l o m a@ @ m o fD m - 0 3 C C 3 co o m v. 0 s o m O ^' o = m: < 3 m 00 CD d j ''., (D (D -'+ (D 3< fD CD O N (D 3 tU n N N � (D (D O X. S 7 a v 3 0 (D Q S 1 Q N— I l< N O O (D N 0 — 7 7 S O- 3 0 a) CD (D �< O cn CL CQ (D �i — — (n :3 . J o OrL ,< O N O o 'n Z7 O �' fD CD O rt N O C m M O O O O U1 CD (D D N c> cD W w m N 'a(n o O cD O / / / / ƒ CD ID 0 \ \ \ \ m 0 2 0 ■ © m .. .. k o < 46 . .. G� W, N) / B m cyl £ o . Cl) Cl) 0 r \ . Cl) 3C ( k . CL ■ . : CD 0°0x0--04=H E,E]ERq#ca \-/ƒE$ n= o n Cl CD m.= I n (0 /.\(n CD 2 � CD CL CD -Cn Z,\° EgS=: /CD \» CD RR\: _}\ /k��\//2R%\ (j a= = a CD 0- � 7 5 e; 2§ m �� Cl E _ CD m - _ - o. J® < m .E=,csq;ate=,=f / \ g H E \ ) / /\ C / �� § \ ¢ C �222/E o§E; K \�} cD _ \`\<o /C)\cr ����� \ ° /CD CD CD ®a M2G %Eo. ] 2 gee%n/°a) E± . =�£=wm. « - m /CD �( \\a)I� \ - = C5. n n //�2 \/Z ƒgm 7R § /� \ / E R J / 2 . n »§2. . f � ? / CL E ° Cl) 0 o w / CD ƒ E o � � CD � 2 2 2 CD � 2 ? CD 0 = m �o /0mM § - 0 0 x 0 O 3 3 (D A 0 m m 3 3 Y Q N C 0 p X 0 O 3 (D U) v 0 0 Q m r m G7 m z R ;o'fl n m m � (D 0 D i 7 ( N (D 0 'r m O 7 O z 3 a CD N; O 3 m (D k CJ1 '•' ,_� - O cn c /2 y .A-r o O 7 Cfl^ Q T 2 i/i r•► �••1• -0 Q (D -0 c CD to D) :D 0 = 3 cD 0 m p1 U! G 2 O O = ;u rl -0 cn O c r (n v, n (n 0 (D o CO m n ' o a °' 0 CD c o CD Q � � j zy 00 Cn 0 3 OV ((DD N O Q (ODD CL 0 'OD N � ( Q (D r•r (0 6 CD n CD = 0' N (n N (D (D " Q 3 0 O 3 C O m 3 3 O_ 7 cn g cn (n �' 3 CD o< -p < 0- o - M Cn (n 0 O— n 3 O O o C ma (0 rn ca �Ua0 � cn (fl a �O o c gym., w CD `� 3�'(0.0 -0 ChCo Q -' (D v m O_ �. N Q Q N m -p (D w . N N O- . (D 3� om 3'��•30 0 n O N n 0 ,� 3 o m m 0 rn m 3 0 W v Q v c�D �, oo < CD 0_ CD 0 n� f�D < < c3i n0i S 0 c cn n (D _ CD CL 0 (D � (0 3= o- -0 v m �_ o cn o CL <D' m• Cn O Q O O CA cn N O 7 cn Cn� O `n N (D 7 Q- 3 �. n� -0 N O-N 'd o c0 cn m* m 0 co 3 0 o (D ai m -' v 0 C �n CD ( (n -. o_ -0 D 5' mET Q O N `2 (cD v O CD n�i 3 cD j- ( O Q 't 3 (n 0- 3 v (n. < O 0. N_ (Oi> 3 Q o o o CD `�' (n ai �' � w c0i ( CD on (D (D (a CD 00,CD Q 3 N 3 co 0 cn 0 v Cn — 0 = Q < o CD � c0 3 v= m o o o m 3 � a c 0-0 (D Q a p -00p0 03��,0o (D 3 0 3' 0 o (0 CD(D 0 W CL CD3- v-(n0 o-0 0 N 0 -n (D �. 0 7 < G CL n cn O M (D N O 0 o O rt 3' (D m = N ear O O D NU) O O ED 3 N = CD � 7 D O 3. Q cn m �• O (a — M CO) v O m Ca 0 0 X 0 0 3 3 CD M N a l< o 0- a o> 0 c w �n n x N W � II 0 0 3 0 3 (D c N � D. (D (D C' m m m CD a z 0 5 0 0 a 0 w (D 0. CD m (CD m ((DD ((D m 0) o o o �. 0 2) to c�D LacD ,Or (D a)7 0 ? O Z 3 Q CD CT1 au -4 rn cn w 0 m (D x v+ y' CD O CD X n �' O O) O 3 CO O = -1-o 2) xoc-)m mD;o=ml mDX2m =-om�Q=ml m�a=m CD v. 25. -0 n m -a a s � a (a -a Q m .� 0 y p1 �D a -0 3' m 0 v 3' Q 0 3' m v 3. co a __ (D y X' R' o 0 1;2 0 w 0 a)+v _ Q. O ;o r D Cn O C a. N C � m m 63 - 0 s 0 g-0 3 a 3 Imu 3 m' N(D = O �,� a N O N n r: 03 m v m 0 0 N',, c O O m ill � lD -0-0 o Q� CL ° m .mX.'� a 0 n 6 (o CD C (D y O 3 j Q. (D 'a m ° N a' m ' n. CD (D u,' 0. ca = � o Q m cn CD < pa 0 'a O (a v. O � m o o m N 0 (� (D (D (� -a m m (D 0 'm o _ m N 3 �' �, m w N <• o m m � v°'i (n .-a 3 -o CD CD Er 0 Q v o m n m N v (`<n a m m a * m 3• m m m ° a N c a 3 o rn 3 o N, cn . n v Q a 3 o a m fD ."� 0 a- _� w o CDN ' a N<�o � my . CD cCD��(D < 0 CDQ m (: m(D : a0-0 o(D 1 CL = m oo ° C CD orao a- o w p CD (.0 QFn. Q� ° cn 5 a-c m (oM M o o �o m n m° o o- m-a m- 3 o n cu (n c n N N Qa m P v3 nm o a rn� .(� W nNCD -o CD ( o o(Do d- n m N o ma o o 3 0? -a m m a CL +v N '00 0 D o m a- co 0 0 �� � � m N ''I 3 m 7 Q 7 N Q (D .� N' T. v .... 3— a° m n �O O= Q O(D N v N �. N tn' CD 0- CD D a- o cfl m n cn0 a) _CL cD N _ O X 0 (n „ O 2 CL m CD = N eY O D N O A rn D m (n �i w N Q N � ° cD w / \ E \ § 9 / ; CD w ° / 7 CD Q CD in 7 & CD \ <\ \ a \ \ m 0 o x _ @ J 7 ƒ / cn n_ 0 » a) \ = to = f Cn k a2 0 0 cl= � @ § m =//2 0 ° \ =3 CD m o = q r ; CD2 ƒ 4 3 \ @ � g e 0- 7 _ _. ] g — ƒ ®/< ƒ m / § % f 2 5 = 0 & $. \ / � CD \ B eeE( « E \ 2 = &E_§ \o ) \ 3 \ _ n \W\ E \ n o 0 ca ƒ ƒ E � D M $ ° 0 2 c m � � 3 M a ƒ § \ � \ 0- W m a Cl) * 2 m 0 Q ƒ/ ƒ ƒ ƒ o m 0 o o= _ _ _ \ \ \ / \ L(MD o FD /§ I \ 0 ] � ,. .. CD -I 0 a a (A)e ƒ� . . 2 .. 3 0 7 @ ƒ 0 0) \ cn m cn = l. _ z z Cl) @ = n\ Ul OD7 @ a CD g . ] ;W CL o @ 9 0 \ / © ) v o ± 0 2 z a o_ e z o= o Cl) J a&& 0 2»® m _» cc / / g / / m / \ \ 5. z = = 7 g CD - / m E§ o%± g 2& a E a o z§± 7 ®P 3 m n 5 y / 0 2 / c \ / _o 3 \ \ o / / / ® ° \- \) �_ } J a/\\ 4 ») ° m cn ° a 2 0& � \ ° 96 o e ® © \ ƒ } / ] / \ E CD 0 = n - \ ® m = e g o - -. _ / = c = e � x © g E } a m = e.o _.- = 0 W n ® " # E ° / § $ . * _ 9 -' a � o ®- = o ] » 0 z —0C/) - z § / 072 \ \ \ $ \ / \ } } \ E G 3 \ < \ a a 7 m_ » e o = y 0cn - ' 2§7R�-- - e < a % _ \ E.///\GC = m = °E°Is±= (n = m (n (D ^ s = _ \ § / 0 2 p / - ( 0 0 § J / z- \ & E 0/ g J\ 0 E_ 2 ©° \ t ®§ ® / \ w } / \ = 7 S 5's _ = s « 0=&u) \ 0=�E` s a §'/®_ , n 2 E CD � n 2 -n o m a• i 7 E m $ 2 J m 0 / = m = :0 ° 0 0 n w O m A c o (� 3 0 3 CD (D r ' m n O D m n z < v 0 CD D 7 O O •D O N CD Cl 0 O 0) O O ;v fD N \(� (D X j U a n O 3 3 < CD (. XD A CD N CD N CD y j .-� , :3 0 0 :3oD O O O C N CD O n W D O a O z cn w N O , (D (D V7 .+ <. CD Cl)//� N CD VOTT I 3 n W m (D G CD CL m CD Q. CD m cr- �(D � �',O < w n -�',D m O n) g a- g Cl) �I,o g 0 v s 0O -� a m CD v s in CD �' s<< v CD co m s °. O_ (D to C n � 0 "O CD � CD (D ,-o o <D CD (D �- CD CD W m m cD a CD m( C a n m N° n'I _) n O n o N 6 j N �•. m O `< fQ =' C) O I' CT J 3 n° O � N n) .C-. "O O (D (Q co CD c o 3 oo CD � x. � ai v o N oo 3 a� � Cr fD 7 CD — N c n (n D v N Cn = 7' CD CO: Q O 0 CD CD (D O9 O G Q cm O0 IV 3 N = Sy O N O 6' CD O O� O CD ;o j 7 CD Q O '.. Q Cn O N to (D � n Q N CD C CL S S m w N S .- 0� �' CD �• -n `G CD CD CD O (D �e (D (D Q. Z X CD° C — = � �' 6 O — C CD U) .C: O '� CD w n °n �' rn 3 0 -o 0 �D 3 _ 3 co x o cXi a o< n a o v a C< �. (� Q o N o3 �. * c: w (fl C C X �? co E - II, O N CD O � O v.« (D Cn (D -�' O 3 S N 3 w O N 2' � O0 7 X(D 0 X Q 3 CD (D o CD ca 3 (D CD j O- O 7 D n m 6 o CD a v 0 m? cD 3 CD m v 0 in p v �. m CD o m 3• c a (D3 w = o.' m 0ao _co I o c gNn o -Q cflzym 3 =3 CD CD N C. n r _n m N -h n O w fD m C rt N O 7 CD ,Z7 rt 3 CD S 'a O 0 O m < D (D N N c o N o O CD7 0 0 �n O v M Er 3 n 0 3 (D CD r m n O m m p p D N 11 0 � o m -a n O CD CD a C ro (D m CD ID c cD < 0 0 0 0 0 t� O O O CD y CD rt lD n O o Z 3 — CA Ut .A W N 0 3 cD v 0 X cn co (o co CD O 00 C O3 0 c' co o o O O CO CD � :U 7 C� U) (n -i Cn D U U coo 0) cn cn n cn Z m MD CD a) Z co CD O j i� cn Q m CD �w Ln•3 G)o c m�Z3 -0n>m �, cn',cno o n -� 0 cj ,� N CD cn - O N 0- n _ C� O 0 (n cD 0 r l < (n n = N (D Ci �. cn cn Q s a (aD c (D• (D (D cn m CD (3j c0i . n �< o m y = `� m m M ='o o- v 0 o v Cr o a cn m N °' 3 c v m not u) 3 _ - m 3 Q n= .. w= v cD - v, cn— 51 cn m o 3 3 CD o m m U) m m cD v a :3 CD n � � � � w 0 3 � � n � - CD < (n s o N � vu) (n _ 0 (n Q N y <D < CD CO CCD N CD 3 (D < Cn � c5D cD cn v 3 a5 m m d z Z m 3 O cn 0 -0 (D 0 0 (D n — � 0 — � �• 0 0 0) (n �oQ��ao 3� 3'��0 ���_� OCD Q. (n 4�icnn (D(D< a)0 C `CDcD-6'ooaomc' CDQ nC Om n (D 7-S (D (D (a v cn N CD CD cn o—D n�om 0m cn CD CY, Cn � oQOG) — :3 N0 -U) a < o o n n 1p 5 O MCL O h � 0 cn - O (D CD N O ED. (D S O O O N CD cD N (a C > fD C1 7 OC N M. = U) N O fD m O 0 0 0 O 3 3 (D co 3 0 (D N N x x m m N X N n O 3 3 (D (A v N 0 O (D r m 0 m z q C 0 ((D m CD CD m m 0 73 =3 :3 D 7 O O O O 0 O :5 -0 X 7 7 7 7 7 7 CD• 0 0) (Dy lD rt cD 0 O o z3 0 3 CD O m x V?. D'I D', D n y. fA FT 0 0 (D 7 C 3 o 3' � � CD I ° �' O C) = -Ooa ' D � -U o O O CD r, M w Ul � N ((;1 'a0 (D A) Z cm <D O N _ i 0 0 o o �• `D p a� o p -i1, v v CD no 6 O5xav,,DZ' C)"o -i T. cn o 3 CD O in 0 0 0 3 a 3 m W c a o (Q m o �. = cn N O (D — m n m _C '.a• X? G) O N CD Q n 3 CO N N v N, O. cn �. N (D .+. > v n Q .n. N N C •�. CD N O n v (n (SD Q `G O (D O .-. O (o "'. N .0 to N m a cn o • (o � CD - s o C� o _T. a cn o o o N U Q"� ON -oa n n Q(n'CAD p•Cy (n N .-.., amN Q o �D — CD v m m o. cv'i C) � - w v o � (n n�i m (Q Ci < < �. m I O cn O (D N' N 7 n' O (D (D —_ (D CD 3 Cn (/> O N (D ? (0 7 (D `� C)`< 0 (n (D 3 C' m 0• cn ? 3 O �, 3 00 (Dr 7 CCE j O d o `C f/1 O N (n 7 zT O O 7 N O •=t (� _. (C 1 (D ry () < -' (D (O 0) II7 tU N .CL (O N (D O 0 �Cw CD cn �� (D 'n T. (D 5' = O (D ,G (p 7 Co � N n 3 N -p C7 v 3 Q O O J v n N O (D O C. C zr O mm�,3 co o v CD (CD m m (D o m(n ?< N cD m C m o' ? m ' o D o m N 3 N v v rn T m 6 �' Q �_ m m 3 v a CD O 3 o O O N (CD O (D `� (n'� (O zr � cn (D N m Q (� a' O a o 0 0 `< (n 0 U) (7 O 0)CL K CD N O 0 Cl)-n;oO h 2) CD m _ N O X (D 7" CD 5 W 'a O O O N CD <D < D m (D 0 7 m CD = (A Vl CDO <D 3 o \ § \ § § / ƒ 0 0 \ ƒ o 0 � (D m .. o � k w 7CA § g m � o - ■ ±@ o 2e 2 to oCl) ] a 7 CL ƒ m % @ ■ ■ m @ 2 _ ■ ° k � _ m � r k E C Q to ■ �e(Jc � o (D n = E - ; - _ = c 3 n o , 5D ƒ _ ¥ E § \ G / 0— CD m E 9 f ° 2 (D ] CDR e= 2 CD « = R - n < (D k0 n « $JLn\\ %CL k @ 7 ° 2 & » § § J Cr r m - EE2sa 0 F.v) . �% o CL m _ 0 CD U / / � f 0 � � @. M =r 2 2 0 ( © 2 ? (D 0 m ~ /0m & CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 9, 2005 TO: Nick Afzali, Transportation Supervisor FROM: Jl��(1--- Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor STAFF CONTACT: Allen Quynn, Surface Water Engineer (ext. 7247) SUBJECT: I-405 South Renton Nickel Project Environmental Assessment Scoping Comments Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has begun the process of preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the I-405 South Renton Nickel Project and is soliciting input on concerns and issues by the affected agencies and municipalities. The WSDOT must receive comments for the I-405 South Renton Nickel Project EA by February 10, 2005. The WSDOT point of contact is: Allison Ray, I-405 Environmental Lead WSDOT — Project Environmental Manager 600 1081h Ave. NE, Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004-9800 The following comments from the Surface Water Utility are based on the review of the Environmental Overview I-405 Corridor Program presented at the January 25, 2005, Agency Scoping Meeting: STORMWATER: General Comments Water quantity control (detention) and water quality improvements will be required for all existing and proposed right-of-way improvements. The quantity and quality controls should be designed using a standard equivalent to the most recent edition of the Washington State Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (Ecology Manual). Afzali/EA Scoping February 9, 2005 Page 2 of 7 2. If WSDOT storm systems currently discharge or are proposed to discharge to City storm systems, the downstream system capacities should be analyzed and off -site improvements made as part of the project, as needed. The hydrologic and hydraulic analysis would need to account for the total tributary area under future land use conditions. 3. Water quality and quantity impacts should be mitigated for the same local drainage basin so there is no impact immediately downstream of the project. The mitigation will need to show that there are no temporary or long term impacts due to increased peak rate and volume of runoff, along with changed water quality, downstream of the project. 4. Separate stormwater facilities must be provided for each sub -basin or threshold discharge area as defined in the Ecology Manual. 5. Upstream flows that are currently being conveyed through WSDOT right-of-way will continue to be conveyed downstream after proposed improvements are constructed. A hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of all existing and proposed culverts and storm systems that cross I-405 should be performed to verify that the systems have adequate capacity to convey the 100-year/24-hour storm event for the total tributary area under future land use conditions. If the analysis indicates that the system has insufficient capacity, then it should be replaced with a properly sized facility. This is needed to ensure that adequate stormwater conveyance can be provided across the I-405 corridor and that the project will not create upstream drainage problems. 6. Any City -owned structures that have to be relocated or are impacted by the project should be fully coordinated with the City as to sizing and location at no cost to the City. 7. If WSDOT proposes an exemption from providing detention and water quality for existing impervious surface (retrofitting), then it must show that the proposed new impervious area does not exceed 50% of the existing impervious surface, within the project limits, which is defined by the project length and width of the right-of-way. Although the redevelopment threshold may not be exceeded for the Nickel Project, it could very well be exceeded for the I-405 Master Plan where an additional two lanes are proposed. How does WSDOT propose to address this issue? When applying the criteria to determine if the project is exempt from having to retrofit existing and new impervious surfaces for flow control and water quality treatment, the criteria should also include the northbound or southbound lanes where improvements are proposed. 8. If retrofitting of existing storm systems to provide flow control and water quality treatment for existing and new impervious surfaces is not proposed, then WSDOT will need to investigate whether it is technically feasible to separate the storm system serving the existing impervious area with the new impervious area requiring water quality treatment. 9. As part of the Nickel Project, design the proposed stormwater facilities in such a way as to allow for expansion for ultimate I-405 improvements. I-405 Northbound HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP 27-Transporation Projects (TIP)\I-405 Corridor Study\SWP 27-3205 South Renton Project\1003 City Correspondence\EAScopingComments2.doc\AQ\RStp Afzali/EA Scoping February 9, 2005 Page 3 of 7 This portion of the project proposes to add a general-purpose lane northbound from approximately 400 west of the BNSF/UP railroad tracks to the SR-167 interchange. The City has the following concerns: There is an existing ditch that runs along the Southside of I-405. This ditch receives runoff from the north side of I-405 that is conveyed through WSDOT right-of-way and receives direct runoff from I-405. Expansion of the roadway to the south will require the conveyance capacity of the ditch be analyzed by WSDOT to determine if improvements are needed. These improvements may include the widening of the ditch and/or a new pipe system down to the outfall to Springbrook Creek. The project will need to maintain the existing drainage patterns and ensure that tributary areas outside of WSDOT right-of- way have acceptable drainage and are not adversely impacted by the project. I-405 Southbound This section of the project proposes to add two general-purpose lanes on the north side of the freeway between the SR-167 interchange and Benson Road and a single general-purpose lane from Benson Road to approximately 500 feet south of the Maple Valley Highway (SR-169). In addition, Benson Road could potentially be realigned between Sam's Club and approximately 1000 feet north of I-405. The Benson Road overpass will be widened for future expansion of I- 405 under the ultimate project. The City's concerns are as follows: 1. Renton Village: Storm runoff generated from the additional two lanes is proposed to discharge to a stormwater facility which is tributary to Rolling Hills Creek. However, prior to discharging into Rolling Hills Creek, the facility will discharge into a flume behind Sam's Club, and then into a culvert across Talbot Road and into the storm system that serves the Renton Village Shopping Center. Portions of this storm system are undersized resulting in flooding of the parking area behind the Shopping Center and adjacent to Rolling Hills Creek. Additionally, Rolling Hills Creek is tributary to two large sub -basins that cross I-405 from the south, the Thunder Hills Creek sub -basin and the North Talbot Hills sub -basin. Consequently, any proposed project discharge upstream of Rolling Hills Creek must be analyzed for potential downstream impacts. 2. Downstream System: Flows from Rolling Hills Creek discharge into two culverts under the I-405 interchange before recombining and entering the Panther Creek Wetlands on the southeast corner of the interchange. Flows continue west in a culvert across SR-167 and enter into a pipe system on East Valley Road and SW 19th Street before outfalling to Springbrook Creek. This entire downstream system will require hydraulic analysis to determine any potential conveyance problems. These pipe systems/culverts may require upgrades to eliminate potential flooding as a result of the Nickel Project improvements. SR-167 Southbound WSDOT proposes to add one general-purpose lane on the west side of the freeway from the I- 405/SR-167 interchange to SW 41 Street. The City's concerns are as follows: HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP 27-Transporation Projects (TIP)\I405 Corridor Study\SWP 27-3205 South Renton Project\1003 City Correspondence\EAScopingComments2.doc\AQ\RStp Afzah/EA Scoping February 9, 2005 Page 4 of 7 The runoff from the additional lane will discharge into an existing ditch that runs along the west side of the freeway. The ditch receives runoff from the backside of businesses along East Valley Road (EVR) and from SR-167 and conveys this runoff north to the SW 23rd Street drainage channel. The current proposal shows a proposed stormwater facility to be located in an undeveloped parcel between EVR and SR-167. If WSDOT plans to discharge to the ditch, a drainage capacity analysis must be performed to show the ditch can convey all tributary flows without creating flooding impacts to adjacent properties. Another alternative WSDOT may want to consider is to discharge runoff from the SR- 167 improvements into the storm system on East Valley Road which from a hydraulics standpoint maybe the only option. WSDOT would need to investigate the East Valley Road storm system capacity to see if improvements are warranted. 2. The existing ditch also provides storage and helps to attenuate runoff from adjacent parcels. This natural storage must be maintained or compensated for at another location within the same drainage system. 3. Capacity analysis will be required for the SW 23rd Street Drainage Channel due to the increase in runoff from the project. This channel receives runoff form a large tributary basin, which includes Panther Creek, on the east side of SR-167. The channel runs adjacent to a large wetland on the south side between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue SW. 4. On the southern limit of the SR-167 improvements, flows from Panther Creek on the east side of the freeway, become divided. Some of Panther Creek crosses SR-167 in a culvert which discharges into an open channel on the west side of the freeway and then into the storm system on East Valley Road which continues down SW 34`h Street before outfalling to Springbrook Creek. The proposed additional lane will require that the culvert be extended to the west into the open channel. A hydraulic analysis will be required to determine the impacts of extending the culvert, as well as a capacity analysis to determine if the runoff from the project will require improvements to the channel and/or storm system in East Valley Road. To potentially minimize downstream impacts in this area, the City would like WSDOT to consider the possibility of redirecting Panther Creek flows into the Panther Creek Wetlands and allow it to flow to the north and into the SW 23rd Street Channel. This concept was identified by the City as a way to reduce flooding in the East Valley Road storm system and to increase wetland function. The resulting increase in flow in the wetland would provide additional water recharge for migratory fish that use the wetlands for rearing and refuge. WETLANDS: General Comments 1. At a minimum the project should be held to a "no net loss " of wetland area, function, and value. Replacement ratios for wetland mitigation should, at a minimum, satisfy Renton's wetland replacement ratios for wetland impacts in Renton. The Department of Ecology's HAFite Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP 27-Transporation Projects (ITP)\1-405 Corridor Study\SWP 27-3205 South Renton Project\1003 City Correspondence\EAScopingComments2.doc\AQ\RStp Afzali/EA Scoping February 9, 2005 Page 5 of 7 or the Army Corps of Engineers' replacement ratios should be acceptable if they are equal to or more stringent then Renton's. 2. Wetland mitigation should be done in the same local drainage basin and as close as possible to where the impact occurs. The City of Renton is working with WSDOT to develop the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank that, if approved and implemented, could be used as a mitigation site for the Renton Nickel Project impacts. I-405 Northbound 1. There maybe wetlands along I-405 Northbound between Springbrook Creek and SR-167. Wetland investigation and delineations should be conducted in this area to determine if the project improvements will result in any impacts to the wetlands. I-405 Southbound None SR-167 Southbound 1. The west side ditch may contain wetlands. Wetland delineation will be required to determine class and function so appropriate mitigation can be applied for any wetland impacts resulting from the filling for the additional lane. STREAM BUFFERS/FISH HABITAT: General Comments 1. The project should provide mitigation to provide for "no net losses" of stream buffer area, function, and value. In addition, the project's impacts to fish habitat (spawning, rearing, and passage) should be held to the same standard. Replacement ratios (2: 1) for impacts to stream buffers and fish habitats should be required. 2. Mitigation should be incorporated at the location of the impact to the maximum degree possible, but the additional mitigation could be done offsite within the same drainage basin within Renton. A mitigation fund could be established for acquisition, restoration, or enhancement of stream buffer and/or prime fish habitat sites that have been determined to be beneficial to improving salmon habitat within Renton. 3. The project should not only mitigate for the action impacts but should have a restoration element to offset prior impacts and the fact that mitigation benefits are not immediately achieved, especially when it comes to stream buffers. Any existing culverts or other stream crossing structures that are barriers or restrictions to fish passage should be replaced with new structures that don't prevent or restrict fish passage. HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water ProjectASWP 27-Transporation Projects ")\1405 Corridor Study\SWP 27-3205 South Renton Project\1003 City Con-espondence\EAScopingComments2.doc\AQ\RStp Afzali/EA Scoping February 9, 2005 Page 6 of 7 4. WSDOT will need to comply with the City's proposed new stream buffer standards that are currently being adopted and the City's Shoreline Master Program regulations for the Cedar River and Springbrook Creek. I-405 Northbound 1. Impacts to the riparian habitat of Springbrook Creek, as a result of widening the I-405 box culvert, must be mitigated. I-405 Southbound 1. Thunder Hills Creek and Rolling Hills Creek may be impacted by the proposed improvements. SR-167 Southbound Any improvements to the SW 23rd Street Channel will need to include mitigation for riparian wetland and habitat. Because of the direct connection of the channel with Springbrook Creek, salmonid species have the opportunity to use the channel to migrate from Springbrook Creek to the Panther Creek Wetlands. FLOODPLAIN: General Comments 1. The project should be required to provide compensatory storage for filling of any floodplain. A "zero rise" to the floodway standard should be applied to the project. 2. The project is also required to comply with all FEMA and National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) standards, since Federal funding will be used. No encroachment into the floodplain should be allowed unless a hydraulic analysis can demonstrate that the zero rise standard can be achieved. The hydraulic analysis should be based upon future land use condition 100-year flood flows. I-405 Northbound 1. Adding the extra lane will also require the widening of the I-405 bridge over Springbrook Creek. WSDOT will need to show that any required structures such as bridge piers, columns or abutments will not result in an increase in the 100-year water surface elevation of the Creek. Also, that adequate clearance between the 100-year water surface elevation and the lowest bridge cord is provided. 2. Any filling in the 100-year floodplain will require compensatory storage. This project must mitigate for the loss of floodplain storage due to filling of the floodplain by removing an equivalent volume of compensatory storage. Compensatory storage HAFi1c Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP 27-Transporation Projects (TIP)\1405 Corridor Study\SWP 27-3205 South Renton Project\1003 City Correspondence\EAScopingComments2.doc\AQ\RStp r Afzali/EA Scoping February 9, 2005 Page 7 of 7 determination shall be based on filling up to the City's modeled 100-year flood elevation under future condition flows, which is 13.7 NGVD 29, revised future condition flows. I-405 Southbound 1. The area near the I-405 and SR-167 interchange on the Renton Village site is mapped as 100-year FEMA Floodplain. If improvements occur in this area, mitigation for floodplain impacts will be required. SR-167 Southbound 1. The area near the SW 23rd Street Channel where widening is proposed is mapped as 100- year FEMA Floodplain. Floodplain impacts at this location will need to be analyzed and mitigation provided. SHORELINES: General Comments 1. The project should comply with the currently adopted Washington State Department of Ecology Shoreline Management Guidelines and City adopted Master Shoreline Program regulations for the Cedar River and Springbrook Creek. I-405 Northbound 1. Springbrook Creek falls under shorelines of the State and the City of Renton's Master Shoreline Program regulations. cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP 27-Transporation Projects (TIP)\I-405 Corridor Study\SWP 27-3205 South Renton Project\1003 City Correspondence\EAScopingComments2.doc\AQ\RStp Alec ,, DATE: PLANNING/BUILDING/ >= PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Nam% M E M O R A N D U M June 2, 2006 TO: Keith Woolley, Transportation Engineer FROM: /�on Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor STAFF CONTACT: Allen Quynn, Surface Water Engineer (ext. 7247) SUBJECT: I-405 Tukwila to Renton Improvement Project Phase 2 Environmental Overview Scoping Comments Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the I-405 Tukwila to Renton Improvement Project - Phase 2 and is requesting that affected agencies or jurisdictions provide input or concerns regarding project environment impact. The following comments from the Surface Water Utility are based on the review of the Environmental Overview I-405 Tukwila to Renton Improvement Project Phase 2 presented at the May 23, 2006, Agency Scoping Meeting: STORMWATER: General Comments 1. Water quantity control (detention) and water quality improvements will be required for all existing and proposed right-of-way improvements. The quantity and quality controls should be designed using a standard equivalent to the most recent edition of the Washington State Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (Ecology Manual). 2. If WSDOT storm systems currently discharge or are proposed to discharge to City storm systems, the downstream system capacities should be analyzed and off -site improvements made as part of the project, as needed. The hydrologic and hydraulic analysis would need to account for the total tributary area under the 100-year future land use conditions. 3. Water quality and quantity impacts should be mitigated for the same local drainage basin so there is no impact immediately downstream of the project. The mitigation will need to show that there are no temporary or long-term impacts due to increased peak rate and volume of runoff, along with changed water quality, downstream of the project. Wooley/I-405 EA Comments June 2, 2006 Page 2 of 7 4. Separate stormwater facilities must be provided for each sub -basin or threshold discharge area as defined in the 2005 Ecology Manual. 5. Upstream flows that are currently being conveyed through WSDOT right-of-way will continue to be conveyed downstream after proposed improvements are constructed. A hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of all existing and proposed culverts and storm systems that cross I-405 should be performed to verify that the systems have adequate capacity to convey the 100-year, 24-hour storm event for the total tributary area under future land use conditions. If the analysis indicates that the system has insufficient capacity, then it should be replaced with a properly sized facility. This is needed to ensure that adequate stormwater conveyance can be provided across the I-405 corridor and that the project will not create upstream drainage problems. 6. Any City -owned structures that have to be relocated or are impacted by the project should be fully coordinated with the City as to sizing and location at no cost to the City. 7. If WSDOT proposes an exemption from providing detention and water quality for existing impervious surface (retrofitting), then it must show that the proposed new impervious area does not exceed 50% of the existing impervious surface, within the project limits, which is defined by the project length and width of the right-of- way. Although the redevelopment threshold may not be exceeded for the Nickel Project, it could very well be exceeded for the I-405 Tukwila to Renton Phase 2 Project where an additional 2 lanes in some locations, new interchange and exterior ramps are proposed. How does WSDOT propose to address this issue? Thresholds for water quality treatment and detention are to be determined for each individual threshold basin and not based on the project as a whole. 8. If the project results in fill in the regulated floodplain, compensatory storage will be required to mitigate for the loss in flood storage. The compensatory storage shall be provided in equal volumes at equal elevations as required under the Renton Municipal Code. I-405 between SR 181 and SR 167 This portion of the project proposes to add a general-purpose lane in both directions on I- 405, construct a split -diamond interchange at Lind Avenue SW with connecting northbound and southbound frontage roads, reconstruction of SW 16th Street from Lind Avenue SW to East Valley Road and construct general purpose direct connector ramp between southbound I-405 and southbound SR-167. The City has the following concerns: 1. The split diamond interchange at Lind Avenue, new frontage roads and reconstruction of East Valley Road will required elevating Lind Avenue between I-405 and SW 16th Street. The additional fill to raise the road may make it difficult to access and maintain any existing utilities, particularly storm. These H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP 27-Transporation Projects (TIP)\I-405 Corridor Study\SWP 27-3205 South Renton Project\1003 City Correspondence\Phase 2 EA ScopingComments. doc\AQtp Wooley/I-405 EA Comments June 2, 2006 Page 3 of 7 utilities may need to be relocated and/or reconstructed so as to be easily accessible for maintenance. This requirement may apply to other areas within the project limits where improvements result in significant elevation changes. Drainage impacts to surrounding properties due to elevation changes need to be mitigated. 2. Any properties adjacent I-405 that will be impacted by the project may require relocation of existing on -site storm systems. These systems will need to be identified and incorporated into the design of the project. I-405 between SR-167 and SR-169 This section of the project proposes to add two additional lanes in both directions, replace/construct four bridges over the Cedar River, and replace the two local street access roads to Renton Hill at the I-405 crossing. The City's concerns are as follows: 1. Renton Village: Storm runoff generated from the additional two lanes is proposed to discharge to a stormwater facility which is tributary to Rolling Hills Creek. However, prior to discharging into Rolling Hills Creek, the facility will discharge into a flume behind Sam's Club, and then into a culvert across Talbot Road and into the storm system that serves the Renton Village Shopping Center. Portions of this storm system are undersized resulting in flooding of the parking area behind the Shopping Center and adjacent to Rolling Hills Creek. Additionally, Rolling Hills Creek is downstream of two large sub -basins that cross I-405 from the south, the Thunder Hills Creek sub -basin and the North Talbot Hills sub - basin. Consequently, any proposed project discharge upstream of Rolling Hills Creek must be analyzed for potential downstream impacts. 2. The existing storm pipe along Talbot Road that conveys Rolling Hills Creek under I-405 shall be analyzed to determine if it has sufficient capacity or will need to be upsized. One option would be to re -direct Rolling Hills Creek to the west in a separate storm pipe that would combine with flows from the unnamed tributary that discharges into a culvert under I-405 before entering Rolling Hills Creek. 3. How will the impacts to Rolling Hills Creek north of I-405 be mitigated as a result of the construction of the southbound frontage road and what is the extent of the impacts? 4. Downstream System: Flows from Rolling Hills Creek discharge into two culverts under the I-405 interchange before recombining and entering the Panther Creek Wetlands on the southeast corner of the interchange. Flows continue west in a culvert across SR-167 and enter into a pipe system on East Valley Road and SW 19u' Street before outfalling to Springbrook Creek. This entire downstream system will require hydraulic analysis to determine any potential conveyance problems. These pipe systems/culverts may require upgrades to eliminate potential flooding as a result of the I-405 Tukwila to Renton Phase 2 project. HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP 27-Transporation Projects (TIP)\I-405 Corridor Study\SWP 27-3205 South Renton Project\1003 City Correspondence\Phase 2 EAScopingComments. doc\AQtp Wooley/I-405 EA Comments June 2, 2006 Page 4 of 7 5. Construction of the northbound frontage road will impact Thunder Hills Creek where it crosses I-405. Hydraulic and structural analysis will be required to evaluate the capacity and structural integrity of the culvert under I-405 and determine whether it needs to be upsized and/or replaced. SR-167 between I-405 and SW 43rd Street WSDOT proposes to add one auxiliary lane on northbound SR-167 between I-405 to SW 43rd Street and reconstruction of East Valley Road between SW 16th Street and SW 23`d Street. The City's concerns are as follows: 1. Capacity analysis will be required for the SW 23`d Street Drainage Channel due to the increase in runoff from the project. This channel receives runoff from a large tributary basin, which includes Panther Creek, on the east side of SR-167. The channel runs adjacent to a large wetland on the south side between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue SW. 2. The runoff from the reconstruction of East Valley road will increase storm water discharging to the East Valley storm system as well as the SW 23`d Street drainage channel. The East Valley storm system from SW 23`d Street to SW 30 Street will need to be evaluated to determine if it has the capacity to convey the additional runoff from the project plus any tributary flow without causing flooding of the roadway. The analysis shall include a backwater model with revised tailwater elevations resulting from increase flows to the SW 23`d Street Drainage Channel. 3. The existing 48" culverts located at the crossing of SW 23`d Street Drainage Channel and East Valley Road will need to be replaced as part of reconstruction of East Valley Road. 4. On the southern limit of the SR-167 improvements, flows from Panther Creek on the east side of the freeway, become divided. Some of Panther Creek crosses SR- 167 in a culvert which discharges into an open channel on the west side of the freeway and then into the storm system on East Valley Road which continues down SW 34`" Street before outfalling to Springbrook Creek. The proposed northbound auxiliary lane will require that the culvert be extended to the east into the wetland. A hydraulic analysis will be required to determine the impacts of extending the culvert, as well as a capacity analysis to determine if the runoff from the project will require improvements to the channel and/or storm system in East Valley Road. To potentially minimize downstream impacts in this area, the City would like WSDOT to consider the possibility of redirecting Panther Creek flows into the Panther Creek Wetlands and allow it to flow to the north and into the SW 23`d Street Channel. This concept was identified by the City as a way to reduce flooding in the East Valley Road storm system and to increase wetland function. The resulting increase in flow in the wetland would provide additional water recharge for migratory fish that use the wetlands for rearing and refuge. HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP 27-Transporation Projects (TIP)\I-405 Corridor Study\SWP 27-3205 South Renton Project\1003 City Correspondence\Phase 2 EAScopingComments. doc\AQtp Wooley/1-405 EA Comments June 2, 2006 Page 5 of 7 WETLANDS: General Comments At a minimum, the project should be held to a "no net loss " of wetland area, function, and value. Replacement ratios for wetland mitigation should, at a minimum, satisfy Renton's wetland replacement ratios for wetland impacts in Renton. The Department of Ecology's or the Army Corps of Engineers' replacement ratios should be acceptable if they are equal to or more stringent than Renton's. 2. Wetland mitigation should be done in the same local drainage basin and as close as possible to where the impact occurs. The City of Renton is working with WSDOT to develop the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank that, if approved and implemented, could be used as a mitigation site for this project. I-405 between SR 181 and SR 167 There maybe wetland impacts along Rolling Hills Creek between I-405 and Renton Village. No impacts are identified in the Environmental Overview Document. I-405 between SR-167 and SR-169 None SR-167 between I-405 and SW 43rd Street The Panther Creek Wetlands will be impacted as a result of the northbound auxiliary lane. STREAM BUFFERS/FISH HABITAT: General Comments The project should provide mitigation to provide for "no net losses" of stream buffer area, function, and value. In addition, the impacts to fish habitat (spawning, rearing, and passage) should be held to the same standard. Replacement ratios (2:1) for impacts to stream buffers and fish habitats should be required. 2. Mitigation should be incorporated at the location of the impact to the maximum degree possible, but the additional mitigation could be done offsite within the same drainage basin within Renton. A mitigation fund could be established for acquisition, restoration, or enhancement of stream buffer and/or prime fish habitat H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP 27-Transporation Projects (TIP)\I-405 Corridor Study\SWP 27-3205 South Renton Project\1003 City Correspondence\Phase 2 EAScopingComments.doc\AQtp Wooley/I-405 EA Comments June 2, 2006 Page 6 of 7 sites that have been determined to be beneficial to improving Salmon habitat within Renton. 3. The project should not only mitigate for the action impacts but should have a restoration element to offset prior impacts and the fact that mitigation benefits are not immediately achieved, especially when it comes to stream buffers. Any existing culverts or other stream crossing structures that are barriers or restrictions to fish passage should be replaced with new structures that don't prevent or restrict fish passage. 4. WSDOT will need to comply with the City's proposed new stream buffer standards that are currently being adopted and the City's Shoreline Master Program regulations for the Cedar River and Springbrook Creek. 1-405 between SR 181 and SR 167 None I-405 Between SR-167 and SR-169 Rolling Hills Creek will be impacted by the proposed connecting southbound frontage road. SR-167 between I-405 and SW 341h Street 1. Any improvements to the SW 23`d Street Channel will need to include mitigation for riparian wetland and habitat. Because of the direct connection of the channel with Springbrook Creek, salmonid species have the opportunity to use the channel to migrate from Springbrook Creek to the Panther Creek Wetlands. 2. The reconstruction of East Valley Road will impact wetlands on the west side of the road between SW 191h Street and the Shurgard Storage Business. These wetlands have not been identified in the Environmental Overview Document. FLOODPLAIN: General Comments l . The project should be required to provide compensatory storage for filling of any floodplain. A "zero rise" to the floodplain standard should be applied to the project. 2. The project is also required to comply with all FEMA and National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) standards, since federal funding will be used. No encroachment into the floodway should be allowed unless a hydraulic analysis can demonstrate that the zero rise standard can be achieved. The hydraulic analysis should be based upon future land use condition 100-year flood flows. HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP 27-Transporation Projects (TIP)\I-405 Corridor Study\SWP 27-3205 South Renton Project\1003 City Correspondence\Phase 2 EAScopingComments.doc\AQtp Wooley/I-405 EA Comments June 2, 2006 Page 7 of 7 I-405 between SR-181 and SR-167 1. Adding the extra lane will also require the widening of the I-405 bridge over Springbrook Creek. WSDOT will need to show that any required structures such as bridge piers, columns or abutments will not result in an increase in the 100- year water surface elevation of the creek. Also, that adequate clearance between the 100-year water surface elevation and the lowest bridge cord is provided. 2. Any filling in the 100-year floodplain will require compensatory storage. This project must mitigate for the loss of floodplain storage due to filling of the floodplain by removing an equivalent volume of compensatory storage. Compensatory storage determination shall be based on filling up to the City's modeled 100-year flood elevation under future condition flows, which is 13.7 NGVD 29, revised future condition flows. I-405 between SR-167 and SR-169 The area near the I-405 and SR-167 interchange on the Renton Village site is mapped as 100-year FEMA Floodplain. If improvements occur in this area, mitigation for floodplain impacts will be required. SR-167 between I-405 and SW 43'd Street 1. The area near the SW 23`d Street Channel where widening is proposed is mapped as 100-year FEMA Floodplain. Floodplain impacts at this location will need to be analyzed and mitigation provided. 2. The northbound auxiliary lane will impact the Panther Creek Wetland, which is mapped as floodplain. Compensatory storage will be required and shall be based on the filling up to the FEMA regulated floodplain elevation. SHORELINES: General Comments The project should comply with the currently adopted Washington State Department of Ecology Shoreline Management Guidelines and City adopted Master Shoreline Program regulations for the Cedar River and Springbrook Creek. I-405 Northbound Springbrook Creek falls under shorelines of the State and the City of Renton's Master Shoreline Program regulations. cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP 27-Transporation Projects (TIP)\I-405 Corridor Study\SWP 27-3205 South Renton Project\1003 City Correspondence\Phase 2 EAScopingComments. doc\AQtp Y o� PLANNING/BUILDING/ .4- , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IZ� IVV M E M O R A N D U M DATE: March 30, 2006 TO: Jill Ding, Development Services Senior Planner FROM: Allen Quynn, Surface Water Utility Engineer (ext. 7247) td SUBJECT: I-405, Renton Nickel Improvement Project SEPA Revie Comments The Surface Water Utility comments are as follows: 1) A detailed drainage report will need to be provided that includes the following: a) Detailed Upstream and Downstream Basin Analysis. b) Detention/WQ requirements including model assumptions and output files. c) Conveyance design including backwater analysis for all proposed pipe systems and existing downstream storm systems to verify adequate capacity. Analysis of upstream tributary basins should be based on future land use conditions. d) The drainage report shall address previously submitted stormwater comments per the City's letter to WSDOT dated February 10, 2005 (attached). 2) The project proposes to use the City's wetland mitigation bank for floodplain compensatory storage mitigation. The City, through an agreement with WSDOT, will equally share with WSDOT surplus compensatory storage mitigation for floodplain impacts. The compensatory storage created by the mitigation bank is additional storage in excess of storage that was simulated in the City's future condition hydraulic analysis of Springbrook Creek (4,400,000 cubic feet). Please call me, if you have any questions. Attachment cc: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP 27-Transporation Projects (TIP)\I-405 Corridor Study\SWP 27-3205 South Renton Project\1003 City Correspondence\Nickel SEPA Comments.doc\AQtp C1 1 Y 0 V KElN 1 ON t..t! Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator February 10, 2005 Allison Ray, I-405 Renton Nickel Project Environmental Manager Washington State Department of Transportation 1-405 Project Team Office 600 - 108th Avenue NE, Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004 Subject: I-405 Renton Nickel Project Environmental Assessment Scoping Comments Dear Ms. Ray: RECEIVED FEB 14 2005 CITY OF RENTON UTILITY SYSTEMS The City of Renton submits the following comments for consideration with regards to the Renton Nickel Project Environmental Assessment (EA) Scoping. General: The City may request that WSDOT have an independent Environmental Coordinator while constructing these projects. One was used during the I-405 Renton I/C to Sunset Boulevard (Renton "S" Curves) Project, and having this independent expertise worked very well and assured proper attention was given to these issues. Water Utility: The project will impact the City's existing drinking water wells and water treatment facilities. The City requests: 1. Geo-technical investigation and analysis of impact to groundwater quality and quantity from the construction of support structures penetrating the City's drinking water well field and the Cedar Valley Aquifer. Provide basis for all analyses and conclusions made in the evaluation. 2. Development of a detailed water quality monitoring plan for potential groundwater contamination from construction activities and from accidental spills of hazardous chemicals. 3. Development of an emergency response and recovery plan in the event of a hazardous chemical spill. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 ® This paper corNa-s 50 % recycled material. 30%post consumer RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE Allison Ray,1-405 Renton Nickel Project Environmental Manager February 10, 2005 Page 2 Re: Environmental Assessment Scoping Comments Transportation: City Arterials and Local Streets The EA should address potential changed traffic patterns and mitigations on City streets due to the reduction in I-405 capacity caused by reduced shoulders and lane shifts. Currently, backups on I-405 approaching SR-167 result in increased traffic on Bronson, Main, Grady, Benson, and South 43rd Street. The EA should address potential traffic mitigation due to any short-term closures of I-405 related to the Benson Road Overpass reconstruction. For example, the City anticipates Bronson/Main/Grady as the only potential detour option. Potential improvements to this route to accommodate I-405 diverted traffic should be addressed, such as the SR-900/SR-515 intersection. The sign bridge for southbound (SB) SR-167 located north of I-405 currently limits the northbound (NB) left -turn storage at Grady Way. The northward extension of the SB SR-167 HOV lane will trigger a review of SR-167 southbound signage south of Grady Way. As part of this EA, the City recommends WSDOT review the jersey barrier to c-curb SR-167 median transition in the vicinity north of I-405. Pedestrian / Non -Motorized The EA should address continuous safe and convenient pedestrian access through the I-405 work area, including Longacres Drive, Oakesdale, Lind, Talbot, and Benson. The Springbrook Trail also crosses under I-405 in the vicinity of Oakesdale. The EA should address trail impacts, closures,,details, etc., including appropriate notification to the public. A long-term desire of the City is to have pedestrian access from Benson Road to Talbot Road in the vicinity of I-405. Traffic Modeling and Simulation Research has shown long-term construction zone impacts to freeway capacity and to diversion routes on arterials. Traffic modeling and simulation should be conducted using appropriate tools in order to fully identify and understand the impacts on local arterials, streets and intersections during construction. Benson Road Overpass WSDOT and the City will continue to analyze the traffic, non -motorized, and emergency response operations for two options for replacement of the Benson Road overpass — either, 1) H: File Sys\TRP\TRP-10\WSD0T 1-405Wickel ProjectWickelProjmtCityComments\NickelPmject EA City Comments Final Feb 10 2005 Allison Ray, 1-405 Renton Nickel Project Environmental Manager February 10, 2005 Page 3 Re: Environmental Assessment Scoping Comments replacement on new alignment to the west of the existing structure, or, 2) replacement on the existing alignment with a full closure for 6-8 months. The impact of increased truck traffic on Benson Road and any proposed haul routes should be addressed with special consideration given to appraising the impact of heavy dump trucks used to bring in fill (in the case of the `parallel' option), or, hauling out materials (in the event the `existing alignment' option is selected). The Benson Road Overpass site is flanked by apartments. WSDOT should address noise issues concerning, but not limited to, such activities as demolition, construction and hauling. City staff and officials must approve of either option before such option proceeds into the design -build contract. Aesthetics / Landscaping Because the Benson Road Overpass replacement will install`a "master plan" element, final recommendations of the Context Sensitive Solutions effort should be applied to this element. Aesthetics and landscaping should be addressed in the EA. Specifically, due to proposed extensive use of retaining walls, wall face treatment must be addressed. Motorized Freight Hazard Mitigation The EA should address potential enhancements to the shoulder, barriers atop retaining walls to reduce the potential for hazardous materials either running or tipping off the roadway. There are numerous locations within the City where such an incident would have detrimental impacts to the natural environment and to valuable City resources, such as its sole source aquifier. STORMWATER: General Comments Water quantity control (detention) and water quality improvements will be required for all existing and proposed right-of-way improvements. The quantity and quality controls should be designed using a standard equivalent to the most recent edition of the Washington State Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (Ecology Manual). 2. If WSDOT storm systems currently, or are proposed to, discharge to City storm systems, the downstream system capacities should be analyzed and off -site improvements made as H: Filc Sys\TRP\TRP-10\WSDOT 1-405\Nickel Pmjw\NickelPtojeoCityComments\NickelProjeet EA City Comments Final Feb 102005 Allison Ray, 1-405 Renton Nickel Project Environmental Manager February 10, 2005 Page 4 Re: Environmental Assessment Scoping Comments part of the project, as needed. The hydrologic and hydraulic analysis would need to account for the total tributary area under future land use conditions. 3. Water quality and quantity impacts should be mitigated for the same local drainage basin so there is no impact immediately downstream of the project. The mitigation will need to show that there are no temporary or long-term impacts due to increased peak rate and volume of runoff, along with changed water quality, downstream of the project. 4. Separate stormwater facilities must be provided for each sub -basin or threshold discharge area as defined in the Ecology Manual. Upstream flows that are currently being conveyed through WSDOT right-of-way will continue to be conveyed downstream after proposed improvements are constructed. A hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of all existing and proposed culverts and storm systems that cross I-405 should be performed to verify that the systems have adequate capacity to convey the 100-year/24-hour storm event for the total tributary area under future land use conditions. If the analysis indicates that the system has insufficient capacity, then it should be replaced with a properly sized facility. This is needed to ensure that adequate stormwater conveyance can be provided across the I-405 corridor and that the project will not create upstream drainage problems. 6. Any City -owned structures that have to be relocated or are impacted by the project should be fully coordinated with the City as to sizing and location and provided at no cost to the City. 7. If WSDOT proposes an exemption from providing detention and water quality for existing impervious surface (retrofitting), then it must show that the proposed new impervious area does not exceed 50% of the existing impervious surface, within the project limits, which is defined by the project length and width of the right-of-way. Although the redevelopment threshold may not be exceeded for the Nickel Project, it could very well be exceeded for the I-405 Master Plan where an additional two lanes are proposed. How does WSDOT propose to address this issue? When applying the criteria to determine if the project is exempt from having to retrofit existing and new impervious surfaces for flow control and water quality treatment, the criteria should also include the northbound or southbound lanes where improvements are proposed. 8. If retrofitting of existing storm systems to provide flow control and water quality treatment for existing and new impervious surfaces is not proposed, then WSDOT will need to investigate whether it is technically feasible to separate the storm system serving the existing impervious area with the new impervious area requiring water quality treatment. H: File Sys\TRP\TRP-10\WSDOT 1-405\Nickel Project\NickelProjectCityCommmts\NickelProject EA City Comments Final Feb 10 2005 Allison Ray, I-405 Renton Nickel Project Environmental Manager February 10, 2005 Page 5 Re: Environmental Assessment Scoping Comments 9. As part of the Nickel Project, design the proposed stormwater facilities in such a way as to allow for expansion for ultimate I-405 improvements. I-405 Northbound This portion of the project proposes to add a general-purpose lane northbound from approximately 400 west of the Burlington Northern Santa F&Union Pacific (BNSF/UP) railroad tracks to the SR-167 interchange. The City has the following concerns: There is an existing ditch that runs along the south side of I-405. This ditch receives runoff from the north side of I-405 that is conveyed through WSDOT right-of-way and receives direct runoff from I-405. Expansion of the roadway to the south will require the conveyance capacity of the ditch be analyzed by WSDOT to determine if improvements are needed. These improvements may include the widening of the ditch and/or a new pipe system down to the outfall to Springbrook Creek. The project will need to maintain the existing drainage patterns and ensure that tributary areas outside of WSDOT right-of-way have acceptable drainage and are not adversely impacted by the project. I-405 Southbound This section of the project proposes to add two general-purpose lanes on the north side of the freeway between the SR-167 interchange and Benson Road and a single general-purpose lane from Benson Road to approximately 500 feet south of the Maple Valley Highway (SR-169). In addition, Benson Road could potentially be realigned between Sam's Club and approximately 1,000 feet north of I-405. The Benson Road overpass will be widened for future expansion of I- 405 under the ultimate project. The City's concerns are as follows: 1. Renton Village: Storm runoff generated from the additional two lanes is proposed to. discharge to a stormwater facility which is tributary to Rolling Hills Creek. However, prior to discharging into Rolling Hills Creek, the facility will discharge into a flume behind Sam's Club, and then into a culvert across Talbot Road and into the storm system that serves the Renton Village Shopping Center. Portions of this storm system are undersized resulting in flooding of the parking area behind the Shopping Center and adjacent to Rolling Hills Creek. Additionally, Rolling Hills Creek is tributary to two large sub -basins that cross I-405 from the south, the Thunder Hills Creek sub -basin and the North Talbot Hills sub -basin. Consequently, any proposed project discharge upstream of Rolling Hills Creek must be analyzed for potential downstream impacts. 2. Downstream System: Flows from Rolling Hills Creek discharge into two culverts under the I-405 interchange before recombining and entering the Panther Creek Wetlands on the southeast corner of the interchange. Flows continue west in a culvert across SR-167 and enter into a pipe system on East Valley Road and SW 191h Street before outfalling to H: File Sys\TRP\TRP- I O\WSDOT 1-405Wickel ProjectWickelProjm,CityCommentsWickelProject EA City Comments Final Feb 10 2005 Allison Ray, 1-405 Renton Nickel Project Environmental Manager February 10, 2005 Page 6 Re: Environmental Assessment Scoping Comments Springbrook Creek. This entire downstream system will require hydraulic analysis to determine any potential conveyance problems. These pipe systems/culverts may require upgrades to eliminate potential flooding as a result of the Nickel Project improvements. SR-167 Southbound WSDOT proposes to add one general-purpose lane on the west side of the freeway from the I- 405/SR-167 interchange to SW 4 1 " Street. The City's concerns are as follows: The runoff from the additional lane will discharge into an existing ditch that runs along the west side of the freeway. The ditch receives runoff from the backside of businesses along East Valley Road (EVR) and from SR-167 and conveys this runoff north to the SW 23rd Street drainage channel. The current proposal shows a proposed stormwater facility to be located in an undeveloped parcel between EVR and SR-167. If WSDOT plans to discharge to the ditch, a drainage capacity analysis must be performed to show the ditch can convey all tributary flows without creating flooding impacts to adjacent properties. Another alternative WSDOT may want to consider is to discharge runoff from the SR- 167 improvements into the storm system on East Valley Road, which from a hydraulics standpoint, may be the only option. WSDOT would need to investigate the East Valley Road storm system capacity to see if improvements are warranted. 2. The existing ditch also provides storage and helps to attenuate runoff from adjacent parcels. This natural storage must be maintained or compensated for at another location within the same drainage system. 3. Capacity analysis will be required for the SW 23rd Street Drainage Channel due to the increase in runoff from the project. This channel receives runoff form a large tributary basin, which includes Panther Creek, on the east side of SR-167. The channel runs adjacent to a large wetland on the south side between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue SW. 4. On the southern limit of the SR-167 improvements, flows from Panther Creek on the east side of the freeway become divided. Some of Panther Creek crosses SR-167 in a culvert which discharges into an open channel on the west side of the freeway and then into the storm system on East Valley Road which continues down SW 34`h Street before outfalling to Springbrook Creek. The proposed additional lane will require that the culvert be extended to the west into the open channel. A hydraulic analysis will be required to determine the impacts of extending the culvert, as well as a capacity analysis to determine if the runoff from the project will require improvements to the channel and/or storm system in East Valley Road. To potentially minimize downstream impacts in this area, the City would like WSDOT to consider the possibility of redirecting Panther Creek flows into the Panther Creek Wetlands and allow it to flow to the north and into H: File SysITRP\TRP-l0\WSD0T 1-405Wickel Projea\NickelProjectCityComments\NickelProjcct EA City Comments Final Feb 102005 Allison Ray, I-405 Renton Nickel Project Environmental Manager February 10, 2005 Page 7 Re: Environmental Assessment Scoping Comments the SW 23fd Street Channel. This concept was identified by the City as a way to reduce flooding in the East Valley Road storm system and to increase wetland function. The resulting increase in flow in the wetland would provide additional water recharge for migratory fish that use the wetlands for rearing and refuge. WETLANDS: General Comments At a minimum, the project should be held to a "no net loss" of wetland area, function, and value. Replacement ratios for wetland mitigation should satisfy Renton's wetland replacement ratios for wetland impacts in Renton. The Department of Ecology or the Army Corps of Engineers' replacement ratios should be acceptable if they are equal to, or more stringent, than Renton's_ 2. Wetland mitigation should be done in the same local drainage basin and as close as possible to where the impact occurs. The City is working with WSDOT to develop the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank that, if approved and implemented, could be used as a mitigation site for the Renton Nickel Project impacts. I-405 Northbound There may be wetlands along I-405 Northbound between Springbrook Creek and SR-167. Wetland investigation and delineations should be conducted in this area to determine if the project improvements will result in any impacts to the wetlands. I-405 Southbound No comments at this time. SR-167 Southbound The west side ditch may contain wetlands. Wetland delineation will be required to determine class and function so appropriate mitigation can be applied for any wetland impacts resulting from the filling for the additional lane. STREAM BUFFERS/FISH HABITAT: General Comments 1. The project should provide mitigation to provide for "no net losses" of stream buffer area, function, and value. In addition, the project's impacts to fish habitat (spawning, H: File SysCfRP\TRP-101WSDOT 1-405Wickel ProjenWickelPmj=tCityCommentsWickelPoject EA City Comments Final Feb 10 2005 Allison Ray, I-405 Renton Nickel Project Environmental Manager February 10, 2005 Page 8 Re: Environmental Assessment Scoping Comments rearing, and passage) should be held to the same standard. Replacement ratios (2:1) for impacts to stream buffers and fish habitats should be required. 2. Mitigation should be incorporated at the location of the impact to the maximum degree possible, but the additional mitigation could be done offsite within the same drainage basin within Renton. A mitigation fund could be established for acquisition, restoration, or enhancement of stream buffer and/or prime fish habitat sites that have been determined to be beneficial to improving salmon habitat within Renton. The project should not only mitigate for the action impacts but should have a restoration element to offset prior impacts and the fact that mitigation benefits are not immediately achieved, especially when it comes to stream buffers. Any existing culverts or other stream crossing structures that are barriers or restrictions to fish passage should be replaced with new structures that don't prevent or restrict fish passage. 4. WSDOT will need to comply with the City's proposed new stream buffer standards that are currently being adopted and the City's Shoreline Master Program regulations for the Cedar River and Springbrook Creek. I-405 Northbound Impacts to the riparian habitat of Springbrook Creek, as a result of widening the I-405 box culvert, must be mitigated. I-405 Southbound Thunder Hills Creek and Rolling Hills Creek maybe impacted by the proposed improvements. SR-167 Southbound Any improvements to the SW 23`d Street Channel will need to include mitigation for riparian wetland and habitat. Because of the direct connection of the channel with Springbrook Creek, salmonid species have the opportunity to use the channel to migrate from Springbrook Creek to the Panther Creek Wetlands. FLOODPLAIN: General Comments 1. The project should be required to provide compensatory storage for filling of any floodplain. A "zero rise" to the floodway standard should be applied to the project. H: File Sys\TRP\TRP-IOIWSDOT 1-405Wickel PmjmtWickelPmjectCityCommentsWicke]Project EA City Comments Final Feb 102005 Allison Ray, 1-405 Renton Nickel Project Environmental Manager February 10, 2005 Page 9 Re: Environmental Assessment Scoping Comments 2. The project is also required to comply with all FEMA and National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) standards, since Federal funding will be used. No encroachment into the floodplain should be allowed unless a hydraulic analysis can demonstrate that the zero rise standard can be achieved. The hydraulic analysis should be based upon future land use condition 100-year flood flows. I-405 Northbound Adding the extra lane will also require the widening of the I-405 bridge over Springbrook Creek. WSDOT will need to show that any required structures such as bridge piers, columns or abutments will not result in an increase in the 100-year water surface elevation of the Creek. Also, that adequate clearance between the 100-year water surface elevation and the lowest bridge cord is provided. 2. Any filling in the 100-year floodplain will require compensatory storage. This project must mitigate for the loss of floodplain storage due to filling of the floodplain by removing an equivalent volume of compensatory storage. Compensatory storage determination shall be based on filling up to the City's modeled 100-year flood elevation under future condition flows, which is 13.7 NGVD 29, revised future condition flows. I-405 Southbound The area near the I-405 and SR-167 interchange on the Renton Village site is mapped as a 100- year FEMA Floodplain. If improvements occur in this area, mitigation for floodplain impacts will be required. SR-167 Southbound The area near the SW 23`d Street Channel where widening is proposed is mapped as a 100-year FEMA Floodplain. Floodplain impacts at this location will need to be analyzed and mitigation provided. SHORELINES: General Comments The project should comply with the currently adopted Washington State Department of Ecology Shoreline Management Guidelines and City adopted Master Shoreline Program regulations for the Cedar River and Springbrook Creek. A: File Sys\TRP\TRP-10\WSDOT 1-405Wickel ProjectWickelProjmtCityCommentsWickelProject EA City Comments Final Feb 102005 Allison Ray, I-405 Renton Nickel Project Environmental Manager February 10, 2005 Page 10 Re: Environmental Assessment Scoping Comments I-405 Northbound Springbrook Creek falls under shorelines of the State and the City of Renton's Master Shoreline Program regulations. FIRE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE Liberty Park Emergency vehicle access to the Wells 1, 2 and 3 facility must be maintained both during and after construction. Benson Road Overpass Closure of the Benson Road during construction will impact emergency vehicle response to areas served by Stations 11, 13, and 14. An additional Fire Department Aid Car may need to be staffed to address this impact. The addition of opticom pass -card gates for emergency vehicle access options should also be considered. General Comments Intersection changes due to this project should result in emergency vehicles being able to travel in all directions when in emergency response mode and not be limited by physical barriers that may be present for normal traffic flow considerations. Emergency vehicle access options should include, but not be limited to, opticom pass -card gates at Grant Avenue and Beacon Way on Renton Hill to optimize emergency vehicle response times both during and after construction to affected areas. Please refer to the attached issue paper Renton Fire Department Response to Areas Affected by the Proposed Benson Road Closure for additional discussion regarding this issue. PARKS 1. Maintain bike accessibility with bike lanes along each side of Benson Road. Make bike lane connection to downtown area. 2. The Thunder Creek Trail connection under I-405 to Benson Road needs to be evaluated with recommendations and accommodations made for trail connections and development. 3. Ensure the Burnett Trail has continued access under I-405 from the north to the south with a connection to the Cascade Trail. H: File Sys\TRP\TRP-10\WSDOT I-405Wickel ProjectWickelPmjmtCityComments\Nickel"eet EA City Comments Final Feb 102005 Allison Ray, 1-405 Renton Nickel Project Environmental Manager February 10, 2005 Page 11 Re: Environmental Assessment Scoping Comments 4. The Cascade Trail Follows Shattuck Avenue South to South 15`h Street, crosses SR-515 (Benson Road) and ties into and follows Puget Drive. This trail route needs to be maintained. A connection for the Oakesdale Avenue SW trail under I-405 needs to be accommodated and maintained. 6. The existing Springbrook Trail under I-405 and along the entire Springbrook Creek needs to be maintained. 7. The SW 16' Trail with connections to the Oakesdale Trail, Springbrook Trail and the Christenson/Interurban trail needs to be maintained. 8. The Christenson and Interurban trails need to be maintained. 9. The Monster Road Trail connection under I405 needs to be maintained. 10. Pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular access to Liberty Park, Cedar River Park, and Narco needs to be maintained. 11. The Cedar River Trail needs to be maintained. Previous Meetings The meeting records from the January 31, 2005, meeting accurately reflect comments by the City regarding the Renton Nickel Environmental Assessment Scoping. City Reviewers: Staff involved in reviewing the subject document project are: Sandra Meyer, Transportation Systems Director Nick Afzali; Transportation Planning and Programming Manager Keith Woolley, Civil Engineer, Transportation Systems Dan Hasty, Civil Engineer, Transportation Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor Abdoul Gafour, Water Utility Engineering Supervisor Leslie Betlach, Parks Director Stanley Engler, Fire Marshall Peter Renner, Facilities Director H: File Sys\TRP\TRP-MWSDOT 1-005\?fmke1 PmjectlNickelProjertGtyCommeMsWickeWrojeo EA City Comme m Firul Feb 10 2005 Allison Ray, I-405 Renton Nickel Project Environmental Manager February 10, 2005 Page 12 Re: Environmental Assessment Scoping Continents Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Nick Afzali, the City's point of contact for the I-405 project, at (425) 430-7245. Sincerely, A, ?-� Y PI Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Attachments cc (letter only): Alex Pietsch, Administrator, EDNSP Dennis Culp, Administrator, Community Services Leslie Betlach, Director, Parks Department Sandra Meyer, Director, Transportation Systems Nick Afzali, Transportation Planning and Programming Manager - Ron Straka, Utility Engineering Supervisor Abdoul Gafour, Utility Engineering Supervisor Stan Engler, Fire Marshall File H. Fik Sys\TRP\TRP-10\WSDOT 1 405Wickel ProjeciWickelProjectCityComments\NickelProjmt EA City Comments Final Feb 10 2005 Allen Quynn - Plan Copies Page 1 1 From: "jeff hamlin" <Jeff. Ham lin@1405.wsdot.wa. gov> To: <aquynn@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 2/24/2005 11:37:23 AM Subject: Plan Copies Allen, Here are the numbers/drawings that I have: TED-40-2244 R-2244OB TED-40-2338 R-2338OD SWP-27-2240 D-224006 SWP-27-2240 D224007 Rolling Hills Creek crossing at 1-405; no drawing number Survey notes for Historic Rolling Hills Creek crossing @ 1-405 Survey notes for Thunder Hills Creek crossing @ 1-405 Survey notes for concrete flume @ Sam's Club property We don't have reference numbers for the survey data. Da Peng may remember which books the notes came out of. The Rolling Hills Creek drawing is very old, but no drawing date is present. The oldest date I see on it is a note that it was microfilmed on 3/1/69. That's all I got. Give me a call if you need anything else. Sorry for the delay. Jeff Hamlin P.E. 1-405 Project Team 600-108th Avenue NE Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004 (425) 456-8504 - Direct jeff.hamlin@1405.wsdot.wa.gov Allen Quynn - Plan Copies Page 1 From: "jeff hamlin" <Jeff.Hamlin@1405.wsdot.wa.gov> To: <aquynn@ci. renton.wa. us> Date: 2/24/2005 11:37:23 AM Subject: Plan Copies Allen, Here are the numbers/drawings that I have: TED-40-2244 R-2244OB TED-40-2338 R-2338OD SWP-27-2240 D-224006 SWP-27-2240 D224007 Rolling Hills Creek crossing at 1-405; no drawing number Survey notes for Historic Rolling Hills Creek crossing @ 1-405 Survey notes for Thunder Hills Creek crossing @ 1-405 Survey notes for concrete flume @ Sam's Club property We don't have reference numbers for the survey data. Da Peng may remember which books the notes came out of. The Rolling Hills Creek drawing is very old, but no drawing date is present. The oldest date I see on it is a note that it was microfilmed on 3/1/69. That's all I got. Give me a call if you need anything else. Sorry for the delay. Jeff Hamlin P.E. 1-405 Project Team 600-108th Avenue NE Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004 (425) 456-8504 - Direct jeff.hamlin@1405.wsdot.wa.gov ..7t�.7 - q0---.2331� j2 - L 3 3 4 S W / 6t-4 2-2,40 b z�q J Gwj C� Pv ,ojt—. i /Z -4 0 j- s - -h 5 ,� /�C�) NJ I�PCT TOO- /.T—qos- t-j S/)UT U) U W O w a H Z W a O J W W `W O w IL a a W) 0 0 N 00 0 0 00 0 00 O C. 00 0 C N N N N N N N J O T O N C h W 7- C7 N O 2 I M u7 1n (O 1z C N N a) (On 0 N (D a) Cl a) E CL c N O t F Z. C C C C C E a w rn m rn rn C C C C C Ul Ul C N N C ~ a) a) O UO a) .T N a) N N W 2 C= 0 0= LL LL LL= LL LL = 0 nao (occc@cc 'M M CO C_ CO CO C U) U� NLO N LO LOU� U� L 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 J > N N N N N N N N N N N No > :!E 7 N N M M 0 C7n LO (D � D (D a7 D (D r a a Q III OD n IA N dp m t0 0 V O CO aD o M m 0 10 O r (h O O N— 10 N O O V O N O M co co @ co co 'Ft m m W U U U m m m p a E E E a a a E E r E E J o o. o f m o o n@ m@ L L L o aUaUUdda(na(nd(n0 i� 0 F L m 0 `o L 3 U (n U > o E N N � � m W N ; a N Z U d' N w N a) L 'DL Q'O z(nQ o6 m 0 C N d Q) C/) W W > C a7 (n r� QZ OZ(n W C-Zm N n W nZLZ .O2 o6.6 y -' C Z> a) co W U1 Y> L N > Z N O m Q N co a 0�>� @ C N > C E a O n o (n Q L W Q a a1 a) C ~ `n cr Erpv ;Lu E o Iy O N O .n 1 C ) W > W C) H �mIQ W(n zoZ m o m �a @ a o 0 U L aa) (D L O _O En E N > (n C> L C L R a) a) C a) C a {p 3 E o @ may nin N o m o a) L a V aaa)iYmQa)a) (nm�m(nw C a p a Q Z N@. a L a C J (� m N Y N a °. CI -O O` 0 Of N U N U) Co L N c _LY f L a) O'o co L C m C c)2=Qa� Q-LLa_ �w¢Y —% N O (0 O O N O V C CO () M a> 0) N N N N N N N (C;N N N m m n co M m m m n M peg U� N co O V) C V u7 m ; In u, ;, v4 a� a a) a7 N aa) Z Z 'E m m LL y 2 E m E C O cU C > m co z z m H 0 O N C` X H U W O w a o w O IL a Q 8 N 6/ h!6 � —��—oY� �_.g/6 y' 1 Objectives: Coordinate solutions to currently identified conflicting and potentially conflicting facilities as determined by the current level of design. 1) Review of Previous Minutes (15 minutes) 2) Review of As -Built Drawing Information / Needs (15 minutes) 3) Review of Potential Conflicts in Benson Road & Talbot Road Area o 16" Water Main (UI# 212) (5 minutes) o 24" Water Main (UI# 238) (5 minutes) o 18" Sanitary Sewer (UI# 245) (5 minutes) Hasty & Dibert MacAskill All 4) Any New Utilities Planned? (10 minutes) City Staff 5) Other Issues (5 minutes) All EE'PImE's NOTF.S Meeting: Renton Utilities Task Force - Meetinq No. 1 1-405 (1-5 to SR-169), Renton Nickel Improvement Project Date: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 Location: Renton City Hall, Meeting Room 511 Time: 11:00 am to 12:00 pm Attendees: ► Distribution/ x Attended (PIT=part-time) x Nick Afzali - Renton x Bruce Dibert —1-405 x John Dan Has - Renton x Douglas MacAskill —1-405 x Keith Woole - Renton No. Stacy Trussler —1-405 x Michael Venoit - Renton No. Ross Fenton —1-405 x Alan Ou nn - Renton No. Randy Norber —1-405 x Abdul Gafour - Renton ► Alan Black —1-405 Px:p--f:T Ra mond Sled - Renton Dave Christiansen — Renton Notes Actions By Date 1.0 Introductions 1.1 Nick Afzali kicked off the meeting by stating that the City of Renton has created a 'Utilities Task Force' to oversee solutions to possible conflicts to City services by the proposed improvements to 1-405, Benson Road and SR167. The Renton UTF and 1-405 Team will meet on the third Wednesday All of each month at Renton City Hall to review and resolve utility issues. 1.2 Each attendee introduced themselves and explained their respective roles and responsibilities. Dan Hasty will be Renton's point of contact for all utility issues. 1.3 Bruce Dibert is the 1-405 Services Manager and he is assisted on the I- 405 project by Randy Norberg. Doug MacAskill is responsible for the Renton Nickel Improvement Project and will coordinate resolution of utility issues. 2.0 Renton Nickel Improvement Project Overview 2.1 Doug MacAskill provided an overview of the Renton Nickel Improvement project and explained the difference between proposed 'Base Nickel' work and "New Law'. 2.2 Bruce Dibert requested copies of all franchise agreements held by the Dan Hasty 20 Apr 05 City of Renton to supplement WSDOT files. 2.3 Abdul Gafour said that he suspects that if federal funds are involved in a D MacAskill 20 Apr 05 project, WSDOT is required to pay 85% of all costs associated with utility relocation / protection regardless of any pre-existing Franchise Agreements. Doug MacAskill said that since the project is funded by a five cent gas tax, it is unlikely any federal funds were involved however he would confirm this. S:10051adminlmeetingslUtilities\Renton Utilities Task Force - Meeting no.1 - 23 Mar 05.doc 3.0 General Discussion 3.1 Alan Quwynn asked if impacts to City drainage systems were to be included in future discussions by the UTF. Doug MacAskill said that in his opinion, unless the Team was trying tto_solve�hysical conflict between the proposed roadway widening and an existing ditch or cross-drainyUTF discussions should be restricted to solving potential impacts to water and sanitary systems. Drainage impacts / issues are being discussed in separate meetings, mainly because of the added complexity created by environmental concerns such as fish passage, potential wetland impacts, hydrologic affects, etc. Alan Black (1-405 Drainage Lead) will be informed of this discussion and Alan B & will arrange to meet separately with Alan Quwynn to formulate a plan for Alan Q ASAP resolving drainage issues. 3.2 Abdul Gafour requested updated Renton Nickel footprint information, typical retaining wall details, bridge column and foundation details and D. MacAskill 20 April 05 position information, etc. so that he can start assessing potential impacts. - 3.3 Abdul Gafour stated that City of Renton's policy would usually require relocation of an existing service if it can not be accessed in future for maintenance purposes. Existing water line at Benson Road was mentioned as an example of a service which will most likely have to be relocated. 3.4 Abdul Gafour said that the City may require "betterment" of their system, such as the addition of a water valve, if access is restricted. 3.5 Bruce Dibert explained WSDOT's intent to execute the Renton Nickel as a design / build project. He also said that it would be desirable to relocate City of Before Nov or protect affected services in advance of construction wherever possible. Renton 2007 Alternatively, the City may want to enter into a separate agreement with the design / build contractor and have them carry out the work on behalf of the City. 3.6 Abdul Gafour requested a letter from the 1-405 Team as soon as possible if Renton is required to pay for relocation or protection of existing services, especially if this is to be done in advance of Renton Nickel 1-405 Team ASAP construction; scheduled to start in early 2008, since the City will have to start reserving / budgeting the necessary funds. 3.7 Alan Quwynn requested a composite drawing showing all existing utilities superimposed on the City's drainage network. The drawings produced for the meeting only show drainage crossings which are franchised. D MacAskill ASAP 3.8 Mike Veniot suggested that the Utilities Task Force concentrate on possible impacts / solutions related to Sanitary Sewer pipe numbers 245 and UTF / 1-405 251 (1-405 crossings near Benson Road) first since these pipes may require Team relocation and are suspected to be very deep. 3.9 Mike Venoit confirmed that current standards require encasement of sanitary sewer pipes in a steel sleeve wherever they cross State roadways. S:10051adminlmeetings\Utilities\Renton Utilities Task Force - Meeting no. 1 - 23 Mar 05.doc Pipe nos. 245 and 251 are very old and are likely made of concrete or vitrified clay. These pipes may not presently be encased or sleeved because of their age. Current sanitary sewer pipe standards call for PVC, ductile iron or "Blue Brut" (C900). 3.10 Mike Venoit said Sanitary Sewer no. 233 is probably very deep (+/-30' at manhole). 3.11 Dave Christiansen said he believes the King County sanitary sewer line which passes under Springbrook Creek bridge is likely a 12' diameter 1-405 Team pipe, and not 7.5' diameter as shown on the bridge as -built drawings. 1-405 Team to investigate. 3.12 Meeting adjourned at 12:15pm. Next Renton Utilities Task Force All Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, 20 April 2005, 11:00am to noon in Room 511 at Renton City Hall. These notes are an interpretation of discussions held. Please provide any additions or corrections to the originator within 5 days of the date signed; otherwise they will be assumed correct as written. ► Prepared by: Doug MacAskill Date: March 31, 2005 S:10051adminlmeetingslUtilitieslRenton Utilities Task Force - Meeting no. 1 - 23 Mar 05.doc FILE NAME PM>I\Engineering\000\utilities\Utility Basemopping\South Renton\Speclalized Basemaps\4pr000a010D_nick_utOlrenton.dgn TIME 3s4900 PM DATE 4/8/2005 - %, =//-' .�- .-• r f. PLOTTED BY cheto r / l` i sJ r 1 0C2W WJr-•N'n fi Z� j'1'l-►�.•.iltil Cl L1 Ln1re E Z O N N I J C O 2 4' ;":� m7c I JmooJc.. \ s_ (A z 010 N CO 0i J Z Vf H ...,.1';;,.. Ln zo o-,oQ o I xN +V1zVfx mvi- Jn O aZ �n „ m� o� SOUTHCENTER P \ i 1 O -msi zz ( 1{ ... s ..�000000 ' f ........ 1/ x wv O` OOOe OOff -I a�OUi t - I c o 3Ca oN r 'm cn — (n z Jf m �vcn oxcn v.,an wa .X+ rzo --IZO zC Otz/1 cn m E <0ZE C' L0 z = may-+c•� �: •; --.,..., i � «. z zo I nzzx scam z v �z vMiaa[z cm-m r..Zs . zz a mrAmz G� o> o•uo Zma O.t --A mx sm I j �sa;o �o m r I m xcm m a o me xmc mrx rv+ m n-I Al m -�W on m i -i — to a r. , E xr, ozr a-0= a� 3 a 0— az— : - < z� M (Jo7m2 � r na om/1 EA m z0 z o 4: C 5 r r 5 , a o f ANDOVER PARK W ri m rn o ' ti t t 65T►'1 AVE S E. i ANDOVER PARK E t CHRIS?ENSEN RD it N NELSONS PL • ` ,N t \ f . i = Nam+ :-1 E so mm m ;arn m sz a0 zz M z M 0 d C-) -4 C o 21Z o 1--� Lnmcnz rIV��� m (,/ a -Dom Me O ooMm ommc-) OC)z—I O z z rn _ m M O z O � � FILE NAME PMI\Engineering\000\uitlities\Utility Basemapping\South Renton\Specialized Basemaps\4prO10a _nick_002renton TIME 802+54 AM «-c> DATE 4/20/2005 1 PLOTTED BY cheto _< , d•Y� ��j /'" wig. " ONSTER RD SW Ln -------_-----------_--------^-_----- --------- - 11"\I../- Cs� LONG w er��• t u1 v �> O2Z D Z ;Ns-•-' s. Z 7i1t�-"" \ \..� VA .1 �'... LW z oo ..>o"A' r•Nc)~ yh;'�' zRZ1 _ F _0fs)rn =cony 70� ME ..�.�'60IO: Mn�01Lr. > ' D a1NmT� c !' Raoul ��• ,,,• -a f 0030 z z ulwmm:D 0-40 Zzw m M 1> m r _ ^ vs�urn ♦M ��* , ,ta vmMm• O 1 1 G iw i t (AZ_ t 'I It - i I t I i � �•'' zo a , WOO ., Op ;.-- CA- 3c>m�f•1^ zZ is �, % A .3i'I. ♦ • t vm2Q!! N� 0 . m rri Z s , C O ;d�N r Q ` (a Zfi12N .OI/t� `3 < m mz i I i v min M a> O 7,- • 1E '�� c>xm- m-1 .. m i i > OD m vm ;;� A $�j4�E s �♦ t{ I V ono �z .- EA m M-00 �2(n 0 >m N; Q NO �l f 1t x �-sm2 a2 Z7Z A 4> �{ m v rvo �zo Zc ocn*> z w < -I cn m ac -<v+E c. c-i z cr> r-+ �t'' M vz z m>-c> wo \ x 3v OZZS Xcom �z i .. .. z o.. >v� m I �c>v.. �z� mcn z m o �Z Nzz �c LI)Om r.•,za �� � a Mr- zm M �z v1v= -ram =macO c> v> ovv Zmc o-< o-+ �_�• :-i• r , -1 -i M " m y -� -4 . -I v m i z A _ • �.�.,, i t ti :l S __- , ,1:. �J✓ 1 .. c me vmc ., mrz rcmn v a :r1�•. sP1. i�� :; - a t N o z m -i v v -I cn o c> m Z rn of orm m . I ) F OD a �� oz� z i of n� s my co iv oamw � . \`, li ! l �M ,^ ,, z- jw a O•r a�>�-+ � lar!r �� � . Z ZZ � om a -, , o -4 34 1� _ > c-tm 1 O .n.. o r: I �, i ` .. - Zo?>oc o cn V1mcn M ZZ zo m z zz zc> +--• ------------� C' v z-4M.. r VIO 31. 2 I »a zT 'f g '' aoz.•.ow o \enm l\ Ic>zz- WOMOMM o �a z � cox :n 'I z Ino00C� 2 •Or J1�.P� W t0 -J N cD Z (n 1 .jF° ~O 10 U7avom cn< U1< IIGFF me zoo moo RAYMOND-�4VE4 mr>ocz> x+t �m •--+-- iw r I M z z v z v s --•- s"'.♦ - _+ T+-- - t s+i=a f.= �<Lnziv vm cnm I I xOOC -a -40 _u Nzz mz _i . xm.. xo zz ono �amo i i ' v• r> as wzz a+;uz a -s-• I I t vm rc m� "a�a 7c aV1 � ' I azz0 coo sszs �o N D zm v'�w r_- sr 11i •�- i-•--• } �Q�rTlr. zAn < o r*,, - cnc>ooc a m O J r 1j��.� O (n00 if•1 • Sam• • > • Y .r I ' I I�I ' I 11 ODNW�a � o000 1� 1� omvm�zm.. � � ii I �tl-71 , S > mo Nzz.. Or a j� ti: II i x M. ,-.Z�+mzm 7+Zj� m N AZZ Zo!. W221' s'•q.2 ��.{ { I B t1 1 -j P ITl _ P I a Z o -0 ZM r i i>, tt __�tr �T� .,•� �Rm1 yoc 0M - �ls J.�-r-;T,r ■ r- r�-rT�-Yr--r--r-- -ram _ ... - ° A2. NIr1Z - R t UGz i ;a L i C �{ T-F+ .1w i°r-_• _ O n>ZZ«. at LIA � =0 I * � '-•r--sr � 1 T� V � )., I ii ' �# • �. 1tt - t ,. zm ' � s ^ m xz O r- zz z zOCR to- IA l— l I T i EAST V�4LLEY RD r.�_.-_• t t , 4rrs r r w• r r s �..� \ x k I I - -- r-- - ---yy- Q W� �� ._ N. _: .. .';'.. .... _._- _•_•_-'_, .4. 51. 12 ilk l6?] .41 I '`°,. „rn l In e ? ! s£•z dw sob- END PROJECT £ 9Id 33S I SR167 SO. RENTON X_`° 3NIl H31" SR167 MP 26.45 =_ FILE NAME PWs\Engin**ring\000\utilities\Utility Bassmapping\South Renton\Specialized B(ssmaps\4prO23i3Q3tknlck_utO3r*nton. n TIME It29tO8 PM �, _•� •, DATE 4/l9/2005 PLOTTED BY ch*to `�� `•� pD c) z -n z (A r) IvoD .- p D•• '•. .. I t i OSF�S -.I ,I Z DD i F 000= om M ;,mo rrn.< NrZU1 D =T .� ♦. P Y 2C7 oc z Ez�o M(n z i mx cn v 0-1 O -a (nm -4o 2 1i vv nz X00 J�IJI ,INi \ •� I „ z y ,N \ F p� } F Aft? . ,A;\\+ : °i� ° ♦� �. N;Z i ' CII d tJf>O' BIZ SIN asr>r0 NZZ ���w. `�i `•�` ♦\ �� O = Z wrri oD2 n1Dx M3. .i --I s m�D ei \\ r ^ 06, %ire �+ \ �\�•�� t �' � . 1 � i x W m m m m O D m m Ul(7 3Vf C) x< x� N;O (A-n(Am N;O am wml ws;x cnacv mm mm �z vz 0 0 z 0 0 z �� •�-r�� O+-� r vm .<. m •v I'T"_•" o �� -D NaOaD N��OD �� -1,1 JD0 aD-1 �1N FQ c . 0Dm Or' az�c m w m CD e C S t lets i &;OM2 �D me m• ►-. Z m" 0 r2-- o Z om MZP4 N r `. �•. to 4 r Ilk .\ DZ Z m ;on x -4 ��ao v0-1 v -- wN-n O aOr' lnxN 1 C, &MMY m `- 0 Z 3 of2 vo1 N; 0 In -n 4 m znAEv rim mz 0 z_ r° '• ,1 zz z wW)< 0 \ ; o -Oo Dz omXCAO wmz O >i \jmo O wxz pr wmzN lk-1 �l D wmoN rri .- m mmmz Ln ` s m N T . • 4� �„�, 'n m yy,> ; c O ' I T 'y D CD m -� C ii •• cn Z �/i F,,,I F. N m MAN M2N "' v�- >-n T^ ,��.)♦ ^� ` / V f TG> C mx ax vz x r x o � z o o (n .y(. a mvz joz 'm (N+1D z .� 7C j7� cc On C) m ;co„ z o� nu �" �0o= cn r o 0 _ �z vaz �c m N r�za �;G) v 0CD = zv >m r'�mz e � j = o � --1 z m; � p �l m>< my msm r i m xcm (0it (n -ao m m 11 O m c 2 0 o me Mmc mrx n 0-1 X-1 �(n o n m W L Z L I t.. N D �-+ O z e tt�� D O�-+ Cf��-" Ar.2-� < K: D t• 1 m c� o c) �R,�, Nm= cam mNm zo z w�"'11Z� (A rn m o T z 0 w s ,5 �C; 19, \ 0---Uzm Z r .- m o ;u O -mr-ID m ; z DD o-no z; m D r 02 Om nz<c� D O3ZIn - z -Dorn v70 ONr N -Ti ,cones L�) zn cn ,z z co o -um-Ip -z o o z 2 m In E r w r-+ -0 C) -I z A(nm -ix7 D �- ;u c U) naz -In n m o�_ m -1 ES D(n S [')o Z r (n D r z� ., r In 0 N now ion? rn z cnDM o z� Doi �z• 2 D E r m N In �-d m i i rn < I � zrn < D 0 z Z M n Ac r) m< z sT z= 0 z ! 2 rn 1 m< � DT so zm 1T Z m G z c, O �T 1S H16Z MS _.,.- 77 I D; I I I _1 I I I I I I i I I I I I �• I i I I � adA saawni I T I , . a I P 1,'t .II 11. �I Lr--•-r-�M C.-....✓ 1 I U) V) co M M m 1--• f-a C) -4-4Z x U) u OX • O N C— m m • m c-) m Z --I o -i 2 Ic D O -4-n rn �m zz ZZ zz -0 ' m CNn m �^ o o C-) D CO m w �V) Z m m-0Cn n p nm Wn O x r—m2 MS D x Vrx0 - ZO zc 0LA*> Z f rn E -;OE z 3 --j z mD—n S �p co• nZZ2 3Com Z O.. Drr m I -1n OI-. - ExJ n <z �>z �c rT,-- , r..zn m CD CO Z;Q warn r _mzi mr c� m �z �� _ on o„O zmc o j x n -i m LA mx Sx] mm Vp m r I m x C m m \ o me Amc - mr-M rLn v m 0-1 M-A O �U, on m i Mr- OZr Z 'px y� D O�-+ cn� Arm �� •...r � z a omn ;a 1 o m Cn = o •- mcnm zo z �m� m z o d i I KOM Q� r S-M ' -zT I ° ,mi s� - P= -1' N z F RENTON WETLANDS zo 1S ab£Z MS o .t I It'..r •9tN5 1 L 5L° ZZ .9I � 33S 3N11 HO10 0 D m N O 0 z m m � A O O Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects 600 — 108th Avenue NE, Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004 Main 425-456-8500 Fax 425-456-8600 May 23, 2005 RECEIVED City,of Renton MAY 2 5 M 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Transportation Systems Div. Attn: Gregg Zimmerman Re: Renton Nickel Improvement Project — Utility Impacts Since our last letter concerning utilities to the City of Renton dated 7 December 2004, work has continued on the preliminary design for the Renton Nickel Improvement Project and the 1-405 Team is on schedule to award completion of the design and construction to a pre -qualified Design/Build Contractor in late 2007. Our Team is working closely with the City of Renton's Utilities Task Force; evaluating and developing solutions to potential conflicts between the proposed road widening and structural work and existing utilities owned by the City of Renton. With respect to city -owned utilities, the City of Renton is legally responsible to pay for the relocation of its facilities located within the 1-405 limited access right of way. Although the legislature has not repealed RCW 47.44.030, the state Supreme Court has ruled unconstitutional the portion of that stature that authorizes the state to pay to relocate utilities )unless a utility owns an easement or fee title to the property. WSDOT is the fee owner of 1-405, a limited access highway, and therefore, the City of Renton is required to pay for its own utility relocation. As our two teams work together to identify utility conflicts, we feel that it is appropriate to suggest that measures be initiated by the City to ensure that sufficient funds are available and contractual matters in -place for relocation or protection of affected services in accordance with existing Utility and Franchise permits, and WSDOT's schedule for the Renton Nickel Improvement Project. Our Engineers are available to meet with City officials and staff at your convenience. In the meantime, rest assured that work is continuing toward identifying and quantifying impacts, if any, to the City's existing services. Please call the undersigned at (425) 456-8542 if you have any questions or concerns. Yours Truly Bruce Dibert Engineering Services Manager Cc: Nick Afzali — Transportation Planning and Programming Manager 1-405 Project Team File ..t. �Washington State A Department of Transportation J Al 40R CITY OF RENTON"LL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Richard C. Houghton, Director October 6, 1987 Mr. Everett Johnson RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY 830 Logan Building Seattle, WA 98101 SUBJECT: Drainage Under 405 Dear Everett: Per our agreement, Renton Village has promised to pay the City of Renton the amount of $60.000.00 toward construction of the new 120 inch diameter pipe under I-405 at South Renton Interchange. As you know the project is now being advertised. Shortly we are going to have to pay the State D.O.T. so I am requesting at this time that you pay the City the $60,000. The money will be deposited in an account with the City from which we will ultimately pay the D.O.T. Thanks for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, J��;L Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director RCH:pmp 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 2682 Washington State Department of Transportation City Joint Projects with I-405 HOV widening WHEREAS the City of Renton, Washington, has heretofore made application for joint City of Renton and Washington State Department of Transportation funding and construction of facilities of importance to the City in connection with the HOV widening of I-405, and WHEREAS the implementation of said projects requires the execution of certain, documents relating thereto including project agreements, acceptance of private easements, assumption of operation and maintenance, and the allocation and expenditure of City, State Department of Transportation, and Federal FHWA Funds, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, 00 RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are hereby found to be true and correct. SECTION II: The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Renton, Washington, are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver unto appropriate governmental agencies any and all documents relating to the acceptance of easements. City/State agreements, project agreements, maintenance ano ooeration agreements. and the allocation and expenditure of City, State Department of Transportation, and Federal FNMA Funds, including the following description, to -*it: Interstate I-405 HOV viden!ng: .Oakesdale Ave. S.W. street extension under I-405 from S.m. Grady way to S.N. 15th St. .Lind Ave. S.N. widening over 1-405 frog+ S.r. Grady ray to S.N. 16th St. .Renton village storm Interceptor from Renton village P1. S. tc the Panther Creek wetlands. .Solt Conservation Service P-1 33rrinage Channel unle; II-aCs fro,r. S.N. Grady way to S.N. 16th St. P.1gr_ 1 011 Z J RESOLUTION NO. 2682 Said project includes certain flood control, drainage facilities, .rater and sanitary sewer facilities, bridge construction, street relocation and road widening improvements. SECTION III: The City Clerk is hereby authorized to certify this Resolution in sufficient copies and furnish same to the appropriate governmental agencies. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 8th day of June , 1987 Maxine E. Motor, CITY CLERK APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 8th day of June , 1987. v- Barbara Y. Shinpoch, MA OR Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Marren, V ATTORNEY page 2 RAC 3 JQ'7J.REg:rftf° �C:�!+:'�:,...�'� � �� J=;f �j 'fx'"�:Y::'" �i'�."t;..:��."".,. �'� ��`r�... x..... -.;>, .e. ._�i =-.� _a. e ..>...� • . _ r:nl4wu';-YFF.yrr.�^s�. ._ .. _ ` - ., .. � � - r CAG-041-87 , Adw ttiaihteotOn ;taft TO OtpartaMM of Traraporttatlon LOCAL AGENCY PARTICIPATING AGREEMENT WORK BY STATE —ACTUAL COST' ORGANIZATION AND ADDRESS City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. So. Renton, WA 98055 AGREEMENT NUMBERQ SECTION/LOCATION GC C7 1 6 4 1 Tukwila to SR-167 HOV Lanes (L-6166) STATE ROUTE CONTROL DISTRICT NUMBER ~UMBER NUMBER 405 1743 1 ADVANCE PAYMENT AMOUNT 112,699.50 DESCRIPTION OF WORK (SR-167) 132-inch drainage system .L:- 1451 A —C e i o X`7 1 ...J I lv •�y L.r.r, yl . . t •..uvr u... r...r. .... ....r ...... - .. between the STATE OF WASHINGTON, Department of Transportation, acting by and through the Secretary of Transporta- tion, hereinafter called the "STATE," and the above named organization, hereinafter called the "LOCAL AGENCY." WHEREAS, the STATE is planning the construction or improvement of a section of state route as shown above, and in connection therewith, the LOCAL AGENCY has requested that the STATE perform certain work as herein described, and WHEREAS, it is deemed to be in the best interest for the STATE to include the necessary items of work, as requested by the LOCAL AGENCY, in the STATE's construction contract proposed for the improvement of this section of State Highway, and WHEREAS, the LOCAL AGENCY is obligated for the cost of work described herein. NOW THEREFORE, by virtue of Title 39.34 and in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants, and performances contained herein, or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof. IT IS % UTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: I GENERAL The STATE, as agent acting for and on behalf of the LO- CAL AGENCY, agrees to perform the above "Description of Work". Plans. specifications and cost estimates shall be prepared by the STATE in accordance with the current State of W � �hington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and adopted design standards, unless otherwise noted. The STATE will incorporate the plans and specifica- tions into the STATE's project and thereafter advertise the resulting project for bid and. assuming bids are received and a contract is awarded, administer the contract. The LOCAL AGENCY hereby approves the plans and specifications for the described work as shown on Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. The LOCAL AGENCY may, if it desires, furnish an in- spector on the project. Any costs for such inspection will be borne solely by the LOCAL AGENCY. All contact between said inspector and the STATE's contractor shall be through the STATE's representative. The LOCAL AGENCY agrees, upon satisfactory compac- tion of the work involved, to deliver a letter of acceptance which shall include a release and waiver of a': futu-e claims or demands of any nature resulting from the performance of the work under this AGREEMENT. 11 PAYMENT The LOCAL AGENCY, in consideration of the faithful performance of the work to be done by the STATE.. agrees to reimburse the STATE for the actual direct and related indi- rcct cost of the work. An itemized estimate of cost for -work to be performed by the STATE at the LOCAL AGE`CY's expcnse is marked Exhibit "A", and is attached hereto and by this reference made a part of Ihis AGREI=.k*ENT. Partial payments shall be made by the LOCAL AGENCY, upon request of the STATE. to cover costs in- curred. These payments arc not to be more frequent than one (1) per month. It is agreed that am such Partial payment will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of an,. item and thar, at the time of final audit, all required adjuci- mcnts will be made and reflected in a final payment. t.. The LOCAL AGENCY agrees that if payment for the work is not made to the STATE within forty-five (45) days after the LOCAL AGENCY has been billed for the work, the STATE may withhold any tax monies which the LOCAL AGENCY is entitled to receive from the Motor Vehicle Fund until payment for the work is received by the STATE. The LOCAL AGENCY agrees to pay the STATE the "Advance Payment Amount" stated above within 20 days after the STATE submits its first partial payment request to the LOCAL AGENCY. The advance payment represents approximately fifteen (15) percent of the estimate of cost and covers costs incurred by the STATE in the initial stages of the project. The advance payment will be carried through- out the life of the project with final adjustment made in the final payment. III DELETION OF WORK In the event the estimate of cost, Exhibit "A", is in excess of $10,000 and the total actual bid prices for the work cov- ered by this AGREEMENT exceeds the estimate of cost by more than 15 percent, the LOCAL AGENCY shall have the option of directing the STATE to delete all or a portion of the work covered by this AGREEMENT from the STATE's contract. The LOCAL AGENCY shall have five (5) working days from the date of written notification to inform the STATE to dclete the work. Should the LOCAL AGENCY exercise its option to delete work, the LOCAL AGENCY agrees, upon billing by the STATE, to reimburse the STATE for prelimi- nary engine ring costs incurred by the STATE to include the work covered by this AGREEMENT in the STATE's con- tract. IV EXTRA WORK In the event unforeseen conditions require an increase in the cost of 25 percent or more from that agreed to on Exhibit "A", this AGREEMEN f will be modified by supplement AGREEMENT covering said increase. In the event it is determined that any change fr•em the description of work contained in this AGREEMENT is re- quired, approval must be secured from the LOCAL AGENCY prior to the beginning of such work_ Where the change is substantial, written approval must be secured. Reimbursement for increased work and/or a substantial change in the description of work shall be limited to costs covered by a written modification, change order or extra work order approved by the LOCAL AGENCY. V RIGHT OF ENTRY The LOCAL AGENCY hereby grants and conveys to the STATE the right of entry upon all land which the LOCAL AGENCY has interest, within or adjacent to the right of way of the highway, for the purpose of constructing said im- provements. Upon completion of the work outlined herein, all future operation and maintenance of the LOCAL AGENCY's fa- cilities shall be at the sole cost of the LOCAL AGENCY and without expense to the STATE. VI LEGAL RELATIONS No liability shall attach to the STATE or the LOCAL AGENCY by reason of entering into this AGREEMENT except as expressly provided herein. IN WITNESS WIiEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year first above written. LOCAL AGENCY By: Citm of Renton _ Mayor Pro tem Date: /y,P 7 - AT•r Es,r : ?laxine E. Motor, 01C City Clerk DOT STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION f By: t. PROJECT D EL&MENT ENGINEER EXHIBIT "A" ESTIMATE OF COST Afe / o /_s ITEM UNIT UNIT PRICE QUANTITY AMOUNT Mobilization L.S. Est. Est. $ 39,166.00 Rem Asph. Conc. Pavement S.Y. 0.75 54 40.50 Rem Chain Link Fence L.F. 1.00 40 40.50 Gr. Borrow incl. Haul Ton 5.00 224 1,120.00 Ditch Exc. incl. Haul C.Y. 3.00 338 1,014.00 Channel Ecx. incl Haul C.Y. 4.00 37 148.00 Concrete inlet Ea. 400.00 1 400.00 Light Loose Riprap Ton 10.00 212 2,120.00 Tr. 2 St. C.P. 0.064" TK - 12" L.F. 15.00 30 450.00 St. Struct. Plate Pipe - 10 Ga. 132" L.F. 377.00 930 350,610.00 Catch Basin - Type 1 Ea. 700.00 1 700.00 Pl. Conc. Sew. Pipe - 12" L.F. 12.00 45 540.00 St. Exc. C1.A - incl. Haul C.Y. 10.00 49 490.00 Shor. & Crib or Extra Exc. CI.A C.S. Est. Est. 470.00 Wire Faced Struct. Earth Wall S.F. 18.00 475 8,550.00 Ballast Ton 6.00 34 210.00 C.S.T.C. Ton 8.00 8 64.00 Anti -Stripping Additive Est. Est. Est. 6.00 ACP Cl. B. Incl. Pay. Asph. Ton 28.00 11 308.00 St. Exc. C1.B. incl Haul - 132" Culo C.Y. 11.00 12,642 139,062.00 Shor. C1.8 - 132" Culo. C.S. Est. Est. 40,000.00 Gr. Bkfill for Found. C1.B C.Y. 15.00 400 6,000.00 Gr. Bkfill for Pipe Bedding C.Y. 13.00 575 7,475.00 Chain Link Fence - type 1 L.F. 6.00 40 240.00 St. Re -bar for Headwall L.B. 0.40 300 120.00 Conc. C1.B for Headwall C.Y. 400.00 5 2,000.00 Beam Guard Rail Type 1 L.F. 9.50 225 2,137.50 Beam Guard Rail Anchor Type 1 Ea. 300.00 1 300.00 Beam Guard Rail Anchor Type 4 Ea. 400.00 1 400.00 Rem. & Reset Conc. Barrier L.F. 3.00 65 195.00 Subtotal $604,376.00 Sales Tax - 8.1% 48,954.45 Subtotal $653,330.45 Engineering - lOb 65,333.04 Contingencies 5b 32,666.52 Total Estimated Cost $751,330.01 *Note: Mobilazation and Engineering Costs will be determined by a pro -ration of the Mobilization and Engineering Costs of the entire project to the construction costs of the work covered by this agreement. 11/14 GC 8164 EXHIBIT "An ESTIMATE OF COST 416 z V /"8 Note: As shown on sheets 3 through 8 of this Exhibit "A" the City is obligated to reimburse the State for 50% of this agreement costs plus 100% of the construction costs for installation of a 100 year design culvert system in lieu of a 25 year normal State design. The City's cost will be computed using 52.43% as a fixed percentage of the construction costs, sales tax and engineering. Therefore: Total estimated cost $751,333.64 x 5Z.43% = 393,924.22, Total estimated cost to the City. 11/16 GC 8164 o O Q O 0 o Q O p O a 0 a 1 y, N � •= .� N, f W 0 tot t yLC vi Ll I S V v r !- vi V U, '� I I `. 0 0 0 ; 0 M �xkid�T KR ` AIM," lVsr A 1. 64 0 0 o 0a J o a 0 0 �°, 3 a . ti r M I W f- 61ml 0 J F— O J ~ rl i I N C IJ � T J o � v) 4. ' 3 144 Cl ca N Z e � � J I \ J z k V N IQkL J J CAL ,1 -Ij rJ zz EYFkQ rT 9?t/�I� O� 4.17 GC 81 t� �' S to ' ` 'J► . r -- r.} • Q (> .Q v J \ S17Zf 4Si 44e 3 a 8 G(; 8164 ru � A t �� r 4 s a •�" J; J J C tj +" to 0 GC 8164 77 Jr Z i 0 ICN, J .1 v ID ry .9 r� it 016 8 8 0 o a p O 2 N N < W tA- ►► � 1Q a � 14 fv vi , N A �«. � � 014 J C ` Z �' '' N lJ M ril: a` N O ' 6�T ►!4 q �sTlkiF �' t'� Q�S7 G 164 L B off' 8 k 15-7 7-71 vim_-_s_,.x:.i�.�•��a_._.._�__ - -_ __ — - - ��..�•.._�..�_ .. .. - K;iy OUVISION OF HIG"WZYS 4=%. wcr E EXHIBIT RB" C. S..... 1 43................ S R -�fn�I .---------- j y GC8164 -. k• , • .�� \` SCALE .._..............1 ��= !DD ............... ............... — _ i38t SActt ,tj 4-2047,) /1 \ a x v \ • 1I -�- 4 8' Camr s d.s=snrae _` OF WGHWAYS x=�, Washington State r Department of Transportation ccoste---t-. f1 Ptv At' . c ipt;Ya1! r-.*Pcvt-j 400CAV., 41 ED Sacilp C-1' "1'.�eat �1fJ'o TiUlCk tLA TO SOUTh RENT014 NOV LANES VADING L DRAMAGE PLAN'S M t r ■ h Zo 12 L' Lira , -T" M I I Pot 4OR 1100 OF HIGHWAYS Washington State C&2 Department of Transportation Pcsp (I IL EXHIBIT B 71-/ 4 fft S, 7 114 V Ci /* een ii•? GC 8164 SCA�E .......... 'r- Vo I SR 405 K- 13 TL'XWILATO SOUTH RENTON HOV LANES �RAOINGP Ate Wa'MA' EL PLANS;- ` 1 :j: :(: ......... ......................... .... ........... . .......... ............... ...... . . ....... ...... ...... .. I: ` { :I I _ .. ....... (: :I :j . ff .; ( l: =�: . !. .E: f: i; I- i t ;- •�: i a� tt 1C I i� .. I� . E •S. � � (}Jj en Is ` ► 11 r fI .��� -----�------� --- - l ' STEE T�RUZTuRAUPL/ATE-PIP E- (. �10 GAGE, 1321N.DIAMI iEO AD.PAW..PIO s DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 1O wA,SH +W •uv�CA '� I' . ....... ..... ......... .. .............................. . ... .......::: r.. { . ......... ........ ":: EXHIBIT" . :I i:. ........ ......:�....... ....... I ,. ....... ...... ...... I ..... i ... l �. . ... R. S,e G C, .................. 1 ....................... , 8164 1 i:- 3 S �� F 191 ..... ..... . SCALE ... { I. ..... ...... -...................... ......... . ! �'. ,...... .: .. .._.. 1 - ! ::' .: _ .::. . ..._... �.. = .. ....... I :�: ..... ......... ......... ......... .... �. r ..... ..... ................: .................. i r 7 ' tr ! I. .41 TEFUSTR Cifta.RAUPLATErPIPE: e 'GAGE. 132 IN. DI AMA r i DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS Washington State Department of Transportation 7 1 __6o,6 ons (Sec c%/a.ILb r Ghee/) � \ I Li. bi Dose ft Pop SECTION AA Special Channel sec-ioil C DR2'.5-Z4.5 4 DRZ-5-Caf- 51ruefure Vofe AY-f3-ZJ M P lY \ 0 tr h ta..a�..11 ttr. Ste.\ Sti.p _ ELsr. Alf ^COQJILyt�J9w t'Sce specie/ flerisi•wa) SPECIAL, C"M314F-L SS,cT10%3 O JI.uNVR "c .r l?- 4l SECTION A -A it 1 S' F...ce Typa 1 A Ctia�M l ass. 8. A 137 tIJ. DIAt-� 9TtturrTU Ro PLACE PIPC tNLlY OETAt` Strrctu.t Able K It - IJ tr�+�t Mwl t ..w 10 Car.wt—.�V^ Pe � w.tt 2r--ft- 4 EXHIBIT�3 C. s. --?43. .% u o ,C sL.147 floe . _......_..�� , - �- 81 -uv-- ---6 4 SHE-ET_4__0F4-SHEETS....--. __�....... grAl F NIA 1.5* c- to c-) AJJ 1.1uc1rah +a tr�lw.aa t rt_ it.S• .s aw..... EL F L 11,E t D/4 1 D/4 O+O/2 Mot Ta Scala. HEADWAIt FOR STECL ST&P MtTtaSo PIPE (Fa. T>-UAS w.i s-.—. Saa St—"..L Plan t-0 s,...a1.4ts Het. IC n - so HIGHWAY DIVISION n We D&I 51-c i Loose Rip Rod EL. ELcv- !GS _fOQs(p!C}Je/L Feb/ic�e� Fi/lei r5ce Specie/ A-ev/sions) t �E e EXHIBIT"BU C. s............... 743 s R ...405 14;7 Ad 8164 - AA ..SHEETS - 1 SHEET4..A!.......4/1. '-. ......, :587. ' SCALE...... _....... N/A ............... ..................... _. Dr\ t P� a PLAT►� AJJ 61w k.A is co%— ea EL. ws. As ew..... EL. 13.U' --1�— -- — — — ''11 =J -..- / TTTTTjjj �I% � ( �i EL iI•Q:� D/4 D/4 D+D/2 NO To Seale. M CADwALI FOR STEEL StcP lmltltEo PIPE (go, Det-As —A See sl.4—k P\sa 9-9) Sf Yuof aea Nofw K !? - W' HIGHWAY DIVISION Washington State c7?> Department of Transportation 2" °50 �fo 'E''ct. � Qt°� Jet QI ff,age&1C.inn/ See ian C PLAN VIEW uru•v.v ✓��r+.c- • Wit:.• y.. H ONnoBH1NON ----__-___ Amy___ 3N1-1-4» i u- N N 0 _J Q �-• N w 0 77�T Y W c i W o 1 L C QI S• y/ U X w f(i; \ � •r C ` � J �7 'Em a _ } o -toL3 to b J I y Y 14 u = u r W in W IT i mu aNf1O8H1NON 3NIl-a3a N � O O r t� P Q k 0 N 3Nt1-(OZ)U �F� �t9 O iWm p N YzLq W r- O: n �i z o � CJ CL Z 3 02• N CNnosHlNON ' 3�m � Y 2 N N a +{l+{+i - v ! �Iillfls H 19) as .1 A ui z KT O .'a m _ r F.. R: 0�. R 3 o ( - d Q 1lVM ON3 O'S9•o WS t� b• j • IL £cso'VL 5 a'^ m a 1 y (%b 1, f�l �1'BB•Sr d'Od [;; 9 _.k: q- Z•i9•e O U) i Q jr �(LS °s6 R �:o �u3 • i ' s O Gy °J k J LL y FLiO •V1S d ���n�/a5 � 6 w •{+-�' JZ"'1s.Si21Q to :e 2 ksO y;�LiQ N Div J`"u� - '-;T, FILE NAME PV:\Engineerinq\000\utilities\Utility Basemappinp\South Renton\4pr023a036b_nick_ut03renton`.s9"* TIME 2:O5t44 PM •. '\ DATE 3/23/2005 \.�+. m PLOTTED BY cheto -i "a O D •- o _ i _ DIY /} YI s j �r� Ln o n a -t > ' (,` F o 000x�I -Ilmn zm m ' Y m vm N -4-� .. a- 0 m mo -4 ? z N •-Z ul =m a .-• T OLOm V)0 m O In zn cc, z A y f iz,o -z z F ;• "Y z -4 cn m -4 m -40 0 f ; Ln O azm; os a 00 �� vva� nz aoo//..�� �yr.� ^� • o NN Z� ��m 1. �I \ r✓�I�� v m� y � mw nzo Noz� -� i , •``•` i,L.�t A z z w I \ r.n Sul 7 � � /`� � I \\'�(•~�e� I n � � w2 O� v ✓ ".� �� `° %► mm • VV^ N;Z . ` .i C•� IJI>•O• Itn-n N(Om J. a \+7� i -Jzl1N dm Wm ao._.O 0l /•\ q` IAmW mUlEm mm A-4 O o [. ;\(b A / \ n / •r .•�.. s_fr �- _< co NDOaa- JDO NDOaD -m CD-1 -IN N40 a 5 A;a WAOD M. ZZ2 Z I y.�r.•. .� t sC) +1 1 (A MA, mzr N z - ♦ FAO \ 0 ;ODIC ;..•- 3.0 JKZ- i • ITN m--f �� yt t+y\ iMm! �mz $ • 0 wcn� 1 f q Dz z •-'00 i. 2 2 ui D TI `ed cnm wmz wmo_ ell DO- .�\ m-4Cil, o W N mMrn 0 y \ sx O Z �r�O+\ / \ \ , ors \• ,. C, \ -q T ` e a o \ \ • C7 O C) z �r T1 m .m-.-0Vf r)2N A to 'Oo-. nm rl)x � N \ J VI _� i' ,• �\ \ �e 'C 1 O �+,. C rzo �zo zC o�*n z .�iC m \+ 1 r� fn m s �oE �� z + h�r vz z mn�c� om�z s,� b s-, kw _x c� <z LA E me m.,w -M -2Z- �if ��+ \I 'f mrTl m 0m =�z� (MA mrmz • m mr m ..�z ���� T Q • ,, \ j m7c =� �o m . 1' gr 1 m .� =cm m QmQ +9 I �� +'' �''� O o me �mc rrlrx rcn -V / '�i 1 ° ■*: � \. s m n --I � D .�-; O 7 -r o O n m W L z C_ l i° I AN `\ n om- (7) C7 Q r) "vmi vmimumi zo z W--�z—q .\ �oH m z o I V! f 1 f�^ i { 7 u u) 2 �O-i I Z� N O Vf-n \nET1 ;0 Z O Z n �3. v:m• wmzN wmo� 1o;oz." FILE NAME PMF\Engineering\000\utllitles\Utility Basemappin9\South Renton\4pr0Ioa023b_n1ck_ut02rNIt0l1• TIME 2F02F53 PM c� i DATE 3/23/2005 ^?1 c�Ob� -. ".�• " ` PLOTTED BY cheto 1 , d•W ��j>� .� >oMrn XZ_ \ r R SW Diu you, i r• � ,. ys i � ��ro ---------------------------- ... _ `-i, • t ::, ;:, f}'i w O 1 ' '. ., - ill �` • ': ` �:... O M m J""' �'�'; J .mow: - - '.:. \ \\\'�• / "^ Raw zz: 1 ITZ Z0 F <. J 1 �, �9 �+ � `, +�\ Y 1r I• :ter✓ CA < p � �1 �< r I. x C m a vm 1 �r.�i moo—c Amy MxrFn1 Tm=x� , z Z * ::.J, :'.d::, t # • ' may'» t \l \ •"`d, 7K V1 n ^•' Z Z Z uw t ti-•d .. +w.-.! y ,. • y _ac _. jf z I : : C O ;a(�I1N i O z I�I zmZN I 1 o mo n1 Oft , .r*�!^t r clam co Ln yr s coz ITI 'tics ' •' �Y i . : __ 1 , ,� w 1 z m i i M y in F' t c< .. ry Z X Tmi aA-r>= `� �ZD� W> N)xO Uf_71O / _ r t� {�+�`` t t m r.'DO 1ZO ZC ON+ND r+ ` ttSS T`a-..a::• ' < V1 m = dO= C• L1 Z = CA ...... ..r A, {{ i -^ V1 .1-r w 3Oz ;� AZZS WZ I. '( a. ..•:I:� : I } 'i V tit �,.;:k;:�.,�. m• ZCO'*1 _ta^.:zr.:.d F I f o CA czi <z Paz �� 1M-0 �.1•za 0-4 «'s s ,,"� s a a......_.,....,_. z �, LAAc -1 00m mrmz -az r. i 1 ,..•::J.. O a voo zz A -•ace c zv1r�^ zN�� j �' ('1; ......... _ 1 •�`` 0 mr m r Zma 0-i x 0 m..0 }.._. ] 1 x OD 0M0 ... Zmx O j .. O-'1 �_-4• :1• • 1 `. I �»• «i � r �,`'� rr ma I scm .40 m =_ ��.. O me Z-1IC .. mra rN > m.- 1�f •- sr y', ( �, g•r __.r 1 J f� WY ,\ _. -I C71 Z1 p 1V1 O0 m Z"" (/, Ol o+m 01 �,, A� • 1 n.,:. 1;.! In>'_" m •"" f)� � 0U1 t0 Z•r OAaW i' l.` II Y S..�,, ..r t , •-' .� s or. ccz'I.r. = av= >-• s m m _z.. a .} I i...-, _ . I...w *^� t z • z r j H.1. Mnf rx .1 " U1m= "=1 O �1 r , II 1 f i , '1\ c� m v+ r*I z o z z o z z v z ao cc, a u, vlmw m z o T -- = .o rr r..' ►r r . . f l'' v; < 4 M I , O N Vim a s .-mz t ?, 030cDoz-*I Com 11 � o C, 1 vDOLn D a = „x.., In-4-ICE �i �. i, :..``. ,�; 1; l^I it r-�l-&� `• cn I O I OS 2 n ^� 1t1 i' 1, v 0 W-INaOZV • ..€1..„.. i�' i u)LT1d-.lOm V1� - O •J r V1 1 1 + s7u - RAYMONG rm-.n.=ZZZ 'V�O;O A�e�.i1 ..L r r` a :. "1W m m 7C --I O .iJ '"1 �� i 11 + �` l+, -Nj'� t7<(nZ2 Om Vim ii 1 I X0002 a -o�v Naoz mz f� �.. z Z7 0•--0 10m01 �` . d r71 >; WZZ a,:OZ i 1 r F. r , i �'-+ 1 i Nc7m rc m-I i 1' i ++li _ 'v!.. .. { I. J I 1 - D OZ Dcn dZZ... ED - ' 11 t Y 1l.,.,' a t! D m •-• n N ... I �' w............ j jll I ��y1' ilr , � iz t 3ZZZ 1 �•'�MO N^ r5}•�{� 1 NQn NT 01-.. _ ., •r Y:- • rt i �t r-v G�•,M `yyC� 0--N... ,^..- 'w .Z :nmC 1T» a N �, �.F Il 1ar 1 C ov oo sz =Fn �o=a: 0000 sz m Il�t! O n mO 1--1 NTZZ•.. NZZr. { v A it �� 1( t x �� �• frn N z �O a==ZN UOi22� :... ��'�I i!! �'1 10 -a� s •1 o g �I �1 + i m ..- �I lr 6 .. j'1l F . 1 N CD 0 M "` e+s J 1I"r`a ' t.: T r .T *r �• S �F is •: Mz - __ _ _ t j { c r- ' in m i f 1• YJ -+'� S - ..r••.••, ( I t I% ,T-a• r,:. ; i�;' .. i nt 1I DO '1 i ,y •�.x . <,^.. +JSd"x,wl r v�1;a,,r �� ro '. I y m co m .y a::.�G.l✓�•M1`y. „' y it I 1 !". ! I1 x� ,r A W ; Z 'c}-`fI • I I 1 I' r Lt I I i 4 i N.O.r ' •+" 'j f.. } i i i r, I r r... 11 4A�::'I. 41 < "" �-p v 3 t i ,..._.1.,1 .. ,tr t r'Ik I , {) �� l,, >Ot'1^i.i- ,^4m tj^ t♦ '' J 11, F( „. i •II ti, rfµ 1, •c m ..gym .-� �T ' A, N -rh 'l •ri..+iA,rl4sa 1-1�r, ri I. fj ,{r r77 zZ{/1i r' •. FI I ZZ ��y'2 2 .i] IP.�Ir �, V-4: ,..1;-1 -'i 'l'•+.___ ,-rl. ^.. ;-.�, - ,(/�r,}�' j It `..�' ...I L: y 1! � 1 ..._, ........... ..�....,°,� "' I. . 4kr C�•; � `�,K.:�ii .� �. _..._ ? '1__._ __1;, _. �' ./f +%/"'"`_'`a"`WL. {I ,r'.ra�". 1` 1 r• �• ( r A` r✓s >ir 'd :,'..'.'7 3`�.-+-" A-, IT 1 F + 1^" �.�n-reti.'l� '+JI sir=�i' +',•,.' iFF iTy�ifi'��Yz� •wf-K"'iir,��-�.n-*W,--n..^ .�.- `'jr l .�u a � Y _ M N Am 4.. _. .... I-r';.-.""-�;�-.\@\+' JJ/�i✓.� r�(j` , �.y�'� �� J ,�..,rl Y, ?000, .,1 :....✓"'_,^ I itar�"r-,H -��� ���1`I.ii1'1` w.,;'S .�� ��,, !'^ y ��•r R. -`` ..' `� ... } . ,� _y '''` END PROJECT er-7 aw 90b-I , ,.,, iK POT, FILE NAME PM:\Engineering\000\utllltles\Utllity Bosemapping\South Renton\IprOlOoO23b_nick_utO2renton. TIME 2102:53 PM •-•c> -i DATE 3/23/2005 N� roe F_s ^ PLOTTED BY cheto IE NSTER RD Zz� \ SW --lk ILONGACR � `dl� ♦�Yw. . . rn r ,s Z _ zz ` I Cal lO rn �(JI 1 rn z z � - '-i '�y i\ ! �V •' s s o c to u FM $ r O A ; a Z c`nilzz`° I 1 5 p AK mn•- o P zc)-lac)— rj LAM Z C O ;dNN r ZO ZZ Z 1-. fig it . • yr'.1 .. OZZ z i N �cemo an llm*i ri' T i C)A=N m� as.� • :. �e ' n co x m OA Spq -- ,� z m I I N m om . -4 p Z ..n .• LE qE `.,, r o z m �lvcn c�xcn ,nm ^" c7 wo z .mx ax xz v w> -n r m o rxo �zo Zc 0V)*a v\ < -a N m z <oz c. �� z z c0 .- vz z 3„ may--n coo a z o., xQ m. Ozzx mcom z is a;V-; m I �c�v �zx mcn O '-I O <z Tnz mC m !A r..zn z -n Inx clam mr-mz �v i l {' oa A OW z� D ;on C ;NA•. ;rn.. i 0 On Ovo r— Zmc c-i 7 O-_I m..0 Z2a I ,.I 1, � ^} i, :. AA�� � m7c =;u I �ZO Vo m cl)0 <'IK y =�.< � r m SCm m SZ ... p rn0 -•n. �, 14:� 1 \ N o me vvc .. mr-v r-0 v s On 1m S1r • \ \ 1 y' � o In Of7 m N O, O,m 01 \ 1 1 1 —!! VIn m n� ON t0 A«• OAAw ".f�l s i.'{ >f .^ J .. n.r,.. a 0r. ccz-).r z �ma n.. s rnz m - m,- ��.�. wrn= o� -! zo c s� it t ry , •; { o R". �0 ;aosoc mvmi vmimvmi m zz zo �! z zz 390 ■--r- ---------J { 0 \A \ 'r�nT.. o n m� I; s_� s m r 00 ~ Ns�a Z v \Nm ?I{ g �z_ cziz n ^� .- m zrn A 11 m co0coozm oomo z 4 _. v0m ul� <v�o Lri�.. �n o Z I -"f1f7 1 Ioi ul 1 0.I i N I I O i4 n \O LIN coZUI a�ocno 0 Ln 0 oo \o m2ocza ;z-n 3ouoT RAYMOND Aug +--r-- � I -+w r .. ZZ z �; v� Y'r' .j-T■---y + it i r- Wv` (A< m_1m7c�a x--•--ry ,--c C c,<cnzx om cnrn I 1 szT� � �ov Nzz -mz s; vo fE M n i cg -i �' 4 '; �! z v c� ss wzz mzz c�>< ncn 1 omom z � - � r ! P 1 1 I i jj m aAi 2N - I A. I i r 1�\ ;;:�, G`7.Oi O % �' 1 � llOD �.. vv'0- •-'O pp mcn �'' < :-r__r_, r__r �• i ' ! ! 1 1 ZZOC ECA O;um. I , ' ! \ a • cam cn 0000 �-zi sz Tvm' m d! i t{I. e) ">Z_ -66 n m0 4- rnoN .'OZ N;Zr .R I II f ! rl 1 OWOO• A a=zz" _ Ul m o u,zz < a 1 L Nmi — -- b '9'NV—+-?.r v--■--\s - r--�T -�■--•-r■-- �5. - 4� mm. r �7}. > .-mo t z 0 z o0 a� rv2 14IK fo do `` N m , Ikk-'G+W`^Wti cY'! �1 A m LZ •___ --I' '__� - riT {I I B r 9,ra SW 7 �1 R .. y, .. zo N..n rA ir'' " • _Y^.�.:�.__r_ - t{� (f `I\ a Yr j �I f J c .....-- ., 39 .n..cNilZ2wx "' ' IS(\,t.. i. Ix .K e'f (}'� 1 ��\'ac,\ • :a i �_.-•__r'i z<z tO.n..GTN EAST VALLEY RDAi LA T -- -- _,s-�� -.s,s ,s--� ✓ic..r•., .s'PF;. ram,-71f Y7.-i�.;x ei tr cr 1-+?.__m. J► 4 .. N � rs_: -u �it r-_r • R-^■- .Y.w. ..,. -- r-, .., .. _..... .:.-AIR ,� - _+._ _. r•:r ....-_ Y~ . "'� ,d't END PROJECT ern £ JIA 33S SR167 SO. RENTON .,Z 3NIl H�1dW SR 167 MP 26.45 zz II if II ie -ST— —Sl— —St— —ST— —ST--i LIST 11 ir x i pro, -1 A SSA: / - �\ jr \ .. +!♦ } ":+' t . w IS k L4�., is '" Y•\1 lY YC�r jv "4 R� ,k t ' ! i mar Y, s ," � 'i,�: �• � ig. a 3 , C wr K 'y6 —15r LS—�^!g— �--15--1$— y � '�*C ♦ 15 +. r ....`"` t IP - 1 � s \s y�.s •. ..1 OOP If 77 k" }1 to Y s S �`--15-—Is --Ys--ls _1$15—f144�1.,.—t5--15--15 • S\;s1S— —15— —15 —;.— —15— —15— —15— 15—:. � 1 { 1 ' 4 ' i -'s, .. .. _ 1 -�s tiY^4-�sAy4t ,... � .+ ..v ci,-ys-:.. 1. _!• x �i � -.-.. _._.c=.v.i).ris-:.a.�a,S�s is- -.� sue--. Y .,.F r r �� AL _y 1 r t ~ ': ` `� a �� �. ♦ } � - ; jY is�'i`-is-+r+ds is-c; Ti ,. ..� ♦ \ ` .: � �4 P � . 1 tr- �A a -. LL- -+ a � , r _ T its — le> 1. /r ;;O is r AYL i �': � 1rI •M t "T i u I w IL 1 ! , a e tom• .• I 1 � •` ` '� •y i ! • ♦+■ � `; m i i�l all itli, lllil f i i -rdini ' '�`,tLtr�t,!Ae.ul�li�r,l tllij� a 4 � • If g • x . 31 5 -ll ` m Fe sop it W1 t � ay —�— iPk. y F "� � � ••.� T hat r „ , N r . 1� -ST {j • 1 Y ' fill 1 Ir C , T ; -1 .in hS w _._____ • t •1 t i I'T4 xan �". _ , i I�.�,"�{� ,� " � • �:i "'"y ^°r' ,� � , ��. tom`` � , i! *a- pf S ,1 t.:i_�•�C �. _ 5r A .,,p LI .. Y p . ,• gym' yt' yt.IM"^'M ewe •� � �Y r �ArAll21 1 _ r Y • . H -i 1 41 r �'� a♦ D i.: I to nn "CZS, ' Afr .+'w.esw.e.+na....... Is—t7 •-AS- yg.y�_.. .. �f -:iST--??---Sf1i5f— e.� air► - it i . c _ sits As �t �sr�. i\Si � %% ' ,r `1'• '� F 8�;99 , ' r \ i 711P r. � �.�'1" •, ' —ts 7 is — :-is--.is—_ 7ri` --7s-- , 11 Is - MU iS- ,s-- N1 a 11 -tea. • .. v1 —Si--si— si--5f:i 7 -'�"}' • !`, _ . fitOlk fir/ • •� `� t)1 1 ! s E Ago �E • N.. J+i _ � r 4 - .I. i ,. i 11 \s 1 e. �, ,Y Ar,� ` 4, ' 1 it . • � � `� i ..� �-: [R u I t ` 11 r 1 t xa..—Si--ci--,: Si--51--St.- y� +w 77 . • a , r� •' t� b•' I , i iil •,1 ' Allen Quynn -Plan Copies Page 1 r: From: "jeff hamlin" <Jeff.Hamlin@1405.wsdot.wa.gov> To: <aquynn@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 2/24/2005 11:37:23 AM Subject: Plan Copies Allen, Here are the numbers/drawings that I have: * TED-40-2244 R-2244OB * TED-40-2338 R-2338OD * SWP-27-2240 D-224006 * SWP-27-2240 D224007 * Rolling Hills Creek crossing at 1-405; no drawing number * Survey notes for Historic Rolling Hills Creek crossing @ 1-405 * Survey notes for Thunder Hills Creek crossing @ 1-405 * Survey notes for concrete flume @ Sam's Club property We don't have reference numbers for the survey data. Da Peng may remember which books the notes came out of. The Rolling Hills Creek drawing is very old, but no drawing date is present. The oldest date I see on it is a note that it was microfilmed on 3/1/69. That's all I got. Give me a call if you need anything else. Sorry for the delay. Jeff Hamlin P.E. 1-405 Project Team 600-108th Avenue NE Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004 (425) 456-8504 - Direct jeff.hamlin@1405.wsdot.wa.gov CITY OF RENTON MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION WORK REQUEST Request No.: WO01979 Mgmt Unit: WTR Request Date: 02/08/05 Time: 1:47P ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LOCATE 5030934 Source: 29 Address: BOB FEATHERSTONE Phone: H (360)709-5451 WSDOT W (360)481-3514 Ext RENTON, WA 98056 Updated: 02/08/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem/Need: SOIL BORINGS. MARK APX 25FT RAD OF WHITE Status: PAINT AND BLUE AND WHITE RIBBONS APX 400FT S SCHEDULED OF ABV INTER AND APZ 30FT W OF S BOUND 405 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location: I 405 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: CEDAR AVE S Taken By: ALH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ASSIGNED Prg: 13 Activity: 50915 Pri: 2 CRITICAL-24 WORK I C/O: 13 Inspected By: ERRIQUEZ Due Date: 02/11/05 Est. Labor Hours: 0 Follow-up: N More?(Req No): CLOSE- Completion Date: / / Time: A P By: OUT Work: Above phone numbers currently have 16 additional pending Requests submitted... See Request Numbers: WO01978, WO01980, WO01981, WO01982, WO01983, WO01984, WO01985, WO01986, WO01987, WO01988, WO01990, WO01991, WO01992, WO01994, WO01995, WO01996 CITY OF RENTON MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION WORK REQUEST Request No.: W001980 Mgmt Unit: WTR Request Date: 02/08/05 Time: 1:48P ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LOCATE 5030937 Source: 29 Address: BOB FEATHERSTONE Phone: H (360)709-5451 WSDOT W (360)481-3514 Ext RENTON, WA 98056 Updated: 02/08/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem/Need: SOIL BORINGS. MARK APX 25FT RAD OF WHITE Status: PAINT AND BLUE AND WHITE RIBBONS APX 140OFT S SCHEDULED OF ABV INTE ON W SHOULDER OF S BOUNT 405 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location: I 405 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: CEDAR AVE S Taken By: ALH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ASSIGNED Prg: 13 Activity: 50915 Pri: 2 CRITICAL-24 WORK I C/O: 13 Inspected By: ENRQIUEZ Due Date: 02/11/05 Est. Labor Hours: 0 Follow-up: N More?(Req No): ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CLOSE- Completion Date: / / Time: A P By: OUT Work: Above phone numbers currently have 16 additional pending Requests submitted... See Request Numbers: WO01978, WO01979, WO01981, WO01982, WO01983, WO01984, WO01985, WO01986, WO01987, WO01988, WO01990, WO01991, WO01992, WO01994, WO01995, W001996 CITY OF RENTON MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION WORK REQUEST Request No.: WO01981 Mgmt Unit: WTR Request Date: 02/08/05 Time: 1:50P ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LOCATE 5030940 Source: 29 Address: BOB FEATHERSTON Phone: H (360)709-5451 WSDOT W (360)481-3514 Ext RENTON, WA 98056 Updated: 02/08/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem/Need: SOIL BORINGS. MARK APX 25FT RAD OF WHITE Status: PAINT AND BLUE AND WHITE ERIBBONS APX 30FT N SCHEDULED OF ABV INTER ON W SHOULDER OF S BND 405 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location: I 405 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: BENSON RD S Taken By: ALH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ASSIGNED Prg: 13 Activity: 50915 Pri: 2 CRITICAL-24 WORK I C/O: 13 Inspected By: ENRIQUEZ Due Date: 02/11/05 Est. Labor Hours: 0 Follow-up: N More?(Req No): CLOSE- Completion Date: / / Time: A P By: OUT Work: Above phone numbers currently have 16 additional pending Requests submitted... See Request Numbers: WO01978, WO01979, WO01980, WO01982, WO01983, WO01984, WO01985, WO01986, WO01987, WO01988, WO01990, WO01991, WO01992, WO01994, WO01995, WO01996 CITY OF RENTON MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION WORK REQUEST Request No.: W001982 Mgmt Unit: WTR Request Date: 02/08/05 Time: 1:52P ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LOCATE 5030943 Source: 29 Address: BOB FEATHERSTON Phone: H (360)709-5451 WSDOT W (360)481-3514 Ext RENTON, WA 98056 Updated: 02/08/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem/Need: SOIL BEARING. MARK APX 25FT RAD OF WHITE Status: PAINT AND BLUE AND WHITE RIBBONS APX 80OFT E SCHEDULED OF RAINIER ON N SHOULDER OF S BOUND OFF RAMP ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location: I 405 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: RAINIER AVE S Taken By: ALH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ASSIGNED I Prg: 13 Activity: 50915 Pri: 2 CRITICAL-24 WORK I C/O: 13 Inspected By: ENRQIUEZ Due Date: 02/11/05 Est. Labor Hours: 0 Follow-up: N More?(Req No): CLOSE- Completion Date: / / Time: A P By: OUT Work: Above phone numbers currently have 16 additional pending Requests submitted... See Request Numbers: W001978, WO01979, WO01980, WO01981, WO01983, WO01984, WO01985, WO01986, WO01987, WO01988, W001990, WO01991, WO01992, WO01994, WO01995, W001996 CITY OF RENTON MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION WORK REQUEST Request No.: W001983 Mgmt Unit: WTR Request Date: 02/08/05 Time: 1:54P ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LOCATE 5030950 Source: 29 Address: BOB FEATHERSTONE Phone: H (360)709-5451 WSDOT W (360)481-3514 Ext RENTON, WA 98056 Updated: 02/08/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem/Need: SOIL BORINGS. MARKAPX 25FT RAD OF WHITE PAINT Status: AND BLUE AND WHITE RIBBONS ON N SHOULDER AT SCHEDULED NW CRNR OF S BND I 405 ON RAMP AT A BV INTER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location: I 405 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: LIND AVE SW Taken By: ALH ASSIGNED I Prg: 13 Activity: 50915 Pri: 2 CRITICAL-24 WORK I C/O: 13 Inspected By: ENRQIUEZ Due Date: 02/11/05 Est. Labor Hours: 0 Follow-up: N More?(Req No): CLOSE- Completion Date: / / Time: A P By: OUT Work: Above phone numbers currently have 16 additional pending Requests submitted... See Request Numbers: WO01978, WO01979, W001980, WO01981, WO01982, WO01984, WO01985, WO01986, W001987, WO01988, WO01990, WO01991, WO01992, WO01994, W001995, W001996 CITY OF RENTON MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION WORK REQUEST Request No.: W001984 Mgmt Unit: WTR Request Date: 02/08/05 Time: 1:56P ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LOCATE 5031012 Source: 29 Address: BOB FEATHERSTONE Phone: H (360)709-5451 WSDOT W (360)481-3514 Ext RENTON, WA 98056 Updated: 02/08/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem/Need: SOIL BORINGS. SITE IS APX 2000FT E FROM INTER Status: ON S SHOULDER OF N-BND I 405. MARK 25FT RAD SCHEDULED OF WHITE PAINT AND BLUE/WHITE RIBBONS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location: I 405 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: INTERURBAN AVE Taken By: ALH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ASSIGNED Prg: 13 Activity: 50915 Pri: 2 CRITICAL-24 WORK I C/O: 13 Inspected By: ENRIQUEZ Due Date: 02/11/05 Est. Labor Hours: 0 Follow-up: N More?(Req No): ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CLOSE- Completion Date: / / Time: A P By: OUT Work: Above phone numbers currently have 16 additional pending Requests submitted... See Request Numbers: WO01978, WO01979, WO01980, WO01981, WO01982, WO01983, WO01985, WO01986, WO01987, WO01988, WO01990, WO01991, WO01992, WO01994, WO01995, W001996 CITY OF RENTON MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION WORK REQUEST Request No.: WO01985 Mgmt Unit: WTR Request Date: 02/08/05 Time: 1:57P ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LOCATE 5031017 Source: 29 Address: BOB FEATHERSTONE Phone: H (360)709-5451 WSDOT W (360)481-3514 Ext RENTON, WA 98056 Updated: 02/08/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem/Need: SOIL BORINGS. ITE IS APX 1600FT W FROM INTER Status: ON S SHOULDER ON N-BND I 405. MARK 25FT RAD SCHEDULED OF WHITE PAINT AND BLUE/WHITE RIBBONS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location: I 405 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: LIND AVE Taken By: ALH ASSIGNED Prg: 13 Activity: 50915 Pri: 2 CRITICAL-24 WORK I C/O: 13 Inspected By: ENRQIUEZ Due Date: 02/11/05 Est. Labor Hours: 0 Follow-up: N More?(Req No): ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CLOSE- Completion Date: / / Time: A P By: OUT Work: Above phone numbers currently have 16 additional pending Requests submitted... See Request Numbers: WO01978, WO01979, WO01980, WO01981, WO01982, WO01983, WO01984, WO01986, WO01987, WO01988, WO01990, WO01991, WO01992, WO01994, WO01995, WO01996 CITY OF RENTON MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION WORK REQUEST Request No.: W001986 Mgmt Unit: WTR Request Date: 02/09/05 Time: 06:05A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LOCATE 5031019 Source: 29 Address: BOB FEATHERSTONE Phone: H (360)709-5451 WSDOT W (360)481-3514 Ext RENTON, WA 98056 Updated: 02/09/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem/Need: SOIL BORINGS. SITE IS APX 1/2 WAY FROM 405 N Status: BND OFF RAMP TOS-BND HWY 167, APX 30FT E FROM SCHEDULED SHOULDER OF S-BND OFF RAMP. MARK 25FT RAD OF ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location: I 405 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: STATE HWY 167 Taken By: ALH --------------- ASSIGNED Prg: 13 Activity: 50915 Pri: 2 CRITICAL-24 WORK I C/O: 13 Inspected By: ENRQIUEZ Due Date: 02/11/05 Est. Labor Hours: 0 Follow-up: N More?(Req No): ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CLOSE- Completion Date: / / Time: A P By: OUT Work: Above phone numbers currently have 16 additional pending Requests submitted... See Request Numbers: WO01978, WO01979, WO01980, WO01981, WO01982, WO01983, WO01984, WO01985, WO01987, WO01988, W0019901 WO01991, WO01992, WO01994, WO01995, W001996 CITY OF RENTON MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION WORK REQUEST Request No.: W001987 Mgmt Unit: WTR Request Date: 02/09/05 Time: 06:12A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LOCATE 5031053 Source: 29 Address: BOB FEATHERSTONE Phone: H (360)709-5451 WSDOT W (360)481-3514 Ext RENTON, WA 98056 Updated: 02/09/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem/Need: SOIL BORINGS. SITE IS APX 1000FT S FROM INTER Status: ON W SIDE OF S-BND SHOULDER OF HWY 167, MARK SCHEDULED 25FT RAD OF WHITE PAINT AND BL/WHITE RIBBONS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location: STATE HWY 167 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: I 405 Taken By: ALH ------------- ASSIGNED Prg: 13 Activity: 50915 Pri: 2 CRITICAL-24 WORK I C/O: 13 Inspected By: ENRIQUEZ Due Date: 02/11/05 Est. Labor Hours: 0 Follow-up: N More?(Req No): CLOSE- Completion Date: / / Time: A P By: OUT Work: Above phone numbers currently have 16 additional pending Requests submitted... See Request Numbers: WO01978, W001979, WO01980, WO01981, WO01982, WO01983, WO01984, WO01985, WO01986, W001988, WO01990, WO01991, WO01992, W001994, W001995, W001996 CITY OF RENTON MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION WORK REQUEST Request No.: WO01988 Mgmt Unit: WTR Request Date: 02/09/05 Time: 06:14A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LOCATE 5031063 Source: 29 Address: BOB FEATHERSTONE Phone: H (360)709-5451 WSDOT W (360)481-3514 Ext RENTON, WA 98056 Updated: 02/09/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem/Need: SOIL BORINGS. SITE IS APX 2000FT S FROM INTER Status: ON W SIDE OF S BND SHOULDER OF HWY 167. MARK SCHEDULED 25FT RAD OF WHITE PAINT AND BLUE/WHITE RIBBON ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location: STATE HWY 167 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: I 405 Taken By: ALH ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ASSIGNED Prg: 13 Activity: 50915 Pri: 2 CRITICAL-24 WORK I C/O: 13 Inspected By: ENRQIUEZ Due Date: 02/11/05 Est. Labor Hours: 0 Follow-up: N More?(Req No): ----------- CLOSE- Completion Date: / / Time: A P By: OUT Work: Above phone numbers currently have 16 additional pending Requests submitted... See Request Numbers: WO01978, WO01979, WO01980, WO01981, WO01982, WO01983, WO01984, WO01985, WO01986, WO01987, WO01990, WO01991, WO01992, WO01994, WO01995, WO01996 CITY OF RENTON MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION WORK REQUEST Request No.: WO01989 Mgmt Unit: WTR Request Date: 02/09/05 Time: 06:30A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LOCATE 5031065 Source: 29 Address: BOB FEATHERSTONE Phone: H (304)709-5451 WSDOT W (360)481-3514 Ext RENTON, WA 98056 Updated: 02/09/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem/Need: SOIL BORINGS. SITE IS APX 3000FT S FROM INTER Status: ON W SIDE OF S-BND SHOULDER OF HWY 167. MARK SCHEDULED 25FT RAD OF WHITE PAINT AND BLUE/WHITE RIBBON ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location: STATE HWY 167 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: I 405 Taken By: ALH ASSIGNED I Prg: 13 Activity: 50915 Pri: 2 CRITICAL-24 WORK I C/O: 13 Inspected By: ENRQIUEZ Due Date: 02/11/05 Est. Labor Hours: 0 Follow-up: N More?(Req No): CLOSE- Completion Date: / / Time: A P By: OUT Work: CITY OF RENTON MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION WORK REQUEST Request No.: W001990 Mgmt Unit: WTR Request Date: 02/09/05 Time: 06:33A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LOCATE 5031070 Source: 29 Address: BOB FEATHERSTONE Phone: H (360)709-5451 WSDOT W (360)481-3514 Ext RENTON, WA 9805 Updated: 02/09/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem/Need: SOIL BORINGS. SITE IS APX 4000FT S FROM INTER Status: ON W SIDE OF S-BND SHOULDER OF HWY 167. MARK SCHEDULED 25FT RAD OF WHITE PAINT AND BLU/WHITE RIBBON ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location: STATE HWY 167 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: I 405 Taken By: ALH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ASSIGNED Prg: 13 Activity: 50915 Pri: 2 CRITICAL-24 WORK I C/O: 13 Inspected By: ENRIQUEZ Due Date: 02/11/05 Est. Labor Hours: 0 Follow-up: N More?(Req No): CLOSE- Completion Date: / / Time: A P By: OUT Work: Above phone numbers currently have 16 additional pending Requests submitted... See Request Numbers: WO01978, WO01979, W001980, WO01981, WO01982, WO01983, WO01984, WO01985, WO01986, WO01987, WO01988, WO01991, WO01992, WO01994, WO01995, W001996 CITY OF RENTON MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION WORK REQUEST Request No.: WO01991 Mgmt Unit: WTR Request Date: 02/09/05 Time: 06:34A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LOCATE 5031075 Source: 29 Address: BOB FEATHERSTONE Phone: H (360)709-5451 WSDOT W (360)481-3514 Ext RENTON, WA 98056 Updated: 02/09/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem/Need: SOIL BORINGS. SITE IS APX 5000FT S FROM 5000 Status: FT S FROM INTER ON W SIDE OF S-BND SHOULDER SCHEDULED OF HWY 167. MARK 25FT RAD OF WHITE PAINT AND ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location: STATE WHY 167 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: I 405 Taken By: ALH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ------------------------------------------------------------- ASSIGNED I Prg: 13 Activity: 50915 Pri: 2 CRITICAL-24 WORK I C/O: 13 Inspected By: ENRIQUEZ Due Date: 02/11/05 Est. Labor Hours: 0 Follow-up: N More?(Req No): ----------- CLOSE- Completion Date: / / Time: A P By: OUT Work: Above phone numbers currently have 16 additional pending Requests submitted... See Request Numbers: WO01978, WO01979, WO01980, WO01981, WO01982, WO01983, WO01984, WO01985, WO01986, WO01987, WO01988, WO01990, WO01992, WO01994, WO01995, WO01996 CITY OF RENTON MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION WORK REQUEST Request No.: WO01992 Mgmt Unit: WTR Request Date: 02/09/05 Time: 06:37A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LOCATE 5031077 Source: 29 Address: BOB FEATHERSTONE Phone: H (360)709-5451 WSDOT W (360) 481-3415 Ext RENTON, WA 98056 Updated: 02/09/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem/Need: SOIL BORINGS. SITE IS APX 2500FT N FROM INTER Status: ONW SIDE OF S BND SHOULDER OF HWY 167. MARK SCHEDULED 25FT RAD OF WHITE PAINT AND BLUE/WHITE RIBBON ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location: STATE HWY 167 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: S 180TH ST Taken By: ALH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ASSIGNED Prg: 13 Activity: 50915 Pri: 2 CRITICAL-24 WORK I C/O: 13 Inspected By: ENRQIUEZ Due Date: 02/11/05 Est. Labor Hours: 0 Follow-up: N More?(Req No): ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CLOSE- Completion Date: / / Time: A P By: OUT Work: Above phone numbers currently have 16 additional pending Requests submitted... See Request Numbers: WO01978, WO01979, WO01980, WO01981, WO01982, WO01983, WO01984, WO01985, WO01986, WO01987, WO01988, WO01990, WO01991, WO01994, WO01995, WO01996 CITY OF RENTON MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION WORK REQUEST Request No.: W001994 Mgmt Unit: WTR Request Date: 02/09/05 Time: 06:40A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LOCATE 5031083 Source: 29 Address: BOB FEATHERSTONE Phone: H (360)709-5451 WSDOT W (360)481-3514 Ext RENTON, WA 98056 Updated: 02/09/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem/Need: SOIL BORINGS. SITE IS APX 1000FT N FROM INTER Status: ONW SHOULDER OF BEGINNING OF S BND OFF RAMP SCHEDULED TO 180TH. MARK 25FT RAD OF WHITE PAINT AND ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location: STATE HWY 167 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: S 180TH ST Taken By: ALH -------------- ASSIGNED Prg: 13 Activity: 50915 Pri: 2 CRITICAL-24 WORK I C/O: 13 Inspected By: ENRQIUEZ Due Date: 02/11/05 Est. Labor Hours: 0 Follow-up: N More?(Req No): CLOSE- Completion Date: / / Time: A P By: OUT Work: Above phone numbers currently have 16 additional pending Requests submitted... See Request Numbers: W001978, WO01979, WO01980, W001981, W001982, WO01983, W001984, WO01985, W001986, WO01987, WO01988, WO01990, W001991, WO01992, W001995, W001996 CITY OF RENTON MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION WORK REQUEST Request No.: WO01995 Mgmt Unit: WTR Request Date: 02/09/05 Time: 06:44A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LOCATE 5031087 Source: 29 Address: BOB FEATHERSTONE Phone: H (360)709-5451 WSDOT W (360)481-3514 Ext RENTON, WA 98056 Updated: 02/09/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem/Need: SOIL BORINGS. SITE IS HALFWAY THRU OFF RAMP Status: OFF 167 TO N BND I 405 APX 15FT N OF 167 OFF SCHEDULED RAMP SHOULDER. MARK 25FT RAD OF WHITE PAINT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location: STATE HWY 167 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: I 405 Taken By: ALH ASSIGNED I Prg: 13 Activity: 50915 Pri: 2 CRITICAL-24 WORK I C/O: 13 Inspected By: ENRQIUEZ Due Date: 02/11/05 Est. Labor Hours: 0 Follow-up: N More?(Req No): CLOSE- Completion Date: / / Time: A P By: OUT Work: Above phone numbers currently have 16 additional pending Requests submitted... See Request Numbers: WO01978, WO01979, WO01980, WO01981, WO01982, WO01983, WO01984, WO01985, WO01986, WO01987, WO01988, WO01990, WO01991, WO01992, WO01994, WO01996 CITY OF RENTON MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION WORK REQUEST Request No.: WO01996 Mgmt Unit: WTR Request Date: 02/09/05 Time: 06:47A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LOCATE 5031094 Source: 29 Address: BOB FEATHERSTONE Phone: H (360)709-5451 WSDOT W (360)481-3514 Ext RENTON, WA 98056 Updated: 02/09/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem/Need: SOIL BORINGS. SITE IS APX 150FFT E FROM INTER Status: APX 15FT S OF N BND I 405. MARK 25FT RAD OF SCHEDULED WHITE PAINT AND BLUE/WHITE RIBBONS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location: I 405 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: STATW HWY 167 Taken By: ALH ASSIGNED I Prg: 13 Activity: 50915 Pri: 2 CRITICAL-24 WORK I C/O: 13 Inspected By: ENRQIUEZ Due Date: 02/11/05 Est. Labor Hours: 0 Follow-up: N More?(Req No): ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CLOSE- Completion Date: / / Time: A P By: OUT Work: Above phone numbers currently have 16 additional pending Requests submitted... See Request Numbers: WO01978, WO01979, WO01980, WO01981, WO01982, WO01983, WO01984, WO01985, WO01986, WO01987, WO01988, WO01990, WO01991, WO01992, WO01994, WO01995 f E " I-405 Coordination City Design Team Meeting Meeting Agenda Conference Room 511 February 9, 2005 1:30-3:00 PM 1. Task Force Updates: a. Nickel Project Mitigation Task Force 15 m - Renton Nickel EA Comments due Feb l Oth - Utility Comments due Feb 18th b. Emergency Response Task Force 10 m - City-wide response time analysis effort - Preliminary evaluation of response time associated with potential temporary - of Benson over -pass c. Environmental Task Force 10 m - SCHAWB / Springbrook Trail - Letter of Agreement d. Pumps/Parks Task Force 5 m - Update e. Traffic Analysis Task Force 15 m - Benson Road "Detour", Operational Analysis - Renton Hill to SR 169 Road Analysis - Letters of Concurrence - Sensitivity Analysis f. Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS, Design Aesthetics) 5 m - Report g. Economic Development Task Force 10 m - Report h. Potential RTID Packages 5 m 2. Citizen Involvement / Public Outreach Process. a. Renton Hill Outreach / Renton Hill Neighborhood Group(s) 5 m 3. Potential topics for next week's (Feb 16th) WSDOT/Renton coordination Mtg 5 m 4. Upcoming Meetings a. Feb 180' Exec/Administrators Mtg 5m Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects ®� •' .I • /< � I► � a� ��tl/ate '� '%LL<//�L•, • . �: � LF�.� �� " /� _ 1 i w 3ftC� �/ �� '�/7 �t�il�Sen Z in7<C$[j�.{A�ttr Ov 31.C, 32 g/Mlyo5. ws,por. c.,u . �,✓ 34 OlelI f'J ;i 0e-1- ► 2AP.0 FMe+- W (S P✓� . 6_4 V�q 37. .-.,I a5-n id!r4u"1`t� �tvuro�, wr,ezh- E0 1405,a,) 3& Aiett f,? 4 ab(a,ck 664G. Go— U 4L ,.14"Chclle Sfeinmf-H— sfeiiim;&W54vr, wa. 44 e e m • jrctiJ LI-1 wa.cJay Congestion Relief S Bus Rapid Transit Projects Bellevue & Renton Nickel EA Agency Scoping Meeting January 25, 2005 Newcastle City Hall, Community Room 9:00 am -12:30 pm NAME EMAIL c_- � I� tom. A C c' lb3 v b !! < Of 8. S "t ! E t,ttaA t ►Et,+� �`� tmGT � �' UYtU�CtY-er�v ,<.c�wt t •---��.��.nnl�1 �-� ���.rr�� cam. ��c.� � ��.�t�s����= ��. us _� to s • tC�biale t�: �tCGtQ� l �Ckcr.r-k ��i INteri�"y`• /N/c�[:tcrsE tti Cr.CCI�Puu.F, s-Vfc L+.�! r tJ2(1 �....-- GLY5ix JOv� Me., .i,o �/t�7 -r S u- c e� e- . Lr L 2-3. a r. w c !/ ���•[".f � f �. rr'+d Cam= � �t,....t.�.. I 405 Team/City of Renton Meeting January 31, 2005 Discussion of Renton Nickel Improvement Project Abdoul: The City of Renton has drinking water supply on the north end of the project. The 405 team needs to show city well and recharge areas, and the impacts to groundwater quality and quantity. Also, the EA needs to discuss how to protect groundwater during construction, the mitigation measures, and how the mitigation measures will be enforced. Abdoul: The City does not feel that their comments on the Corridor EIS and North Renton project have been properly addressed. It is not adequate to say that there will be no impacts to groundwater. Larry: To clarify, the Cedar and Renton overpasses will remain unchanged for the Renton Nickel Improvement Project. There are two proposals for Benson Road, and the Fire Department's concerns will be addressed if Benson Road stays open during construction. There needs to be a discussion of impacts if it is decided that existing Benson Road needs to be temporarily closed down during construction. Leslie: Will there be a trail located along Benson? The City needs a bike lane on each side of Benson. Sandra: Will the project touch any of Panther Creek? Abdoul: Will the project add any additional hydrants along corridor? Larry: Will the project remove any existing hydrants at Benson Road? Larry: To clarify, during construction WSDOT will leave Benson Road as is and will not cut into the existing fire protection system until the new system is energized. Sandra: When does the construction -staging plan come out? Keith: Will the project be placing girders when widening structures? Will WSDOT have to close I-405 during removal of the existing Benson Road bridge? Will there will be localized closures at Benson Road? Abdoul: Has the team already made utility contacts for the project? Abdoul: The City has old waterlines located near Benson Road. During construction, pile driving and vibration could cause impacts to those waterlines (both during and after construction). The team should look at these possible impacts to the old waterlines, and determine how project staff and city staff can work together to determine appropriate actions. The team can avoid impacts to these waterlines through coordination with the city. Larry: There may be high-pressure fuel lines within the project area. Ron: The City can provide as -built information to the 405 team. Larry: There are multiple grades of petroleum products that run from the facility in Renton to SeaTac, however, the City is not sure if Jet Fuel is one of these. Gregg: In the project area, Olympic Pipeline carries liquid petroleum products, and Williams/PSE carry natural gas. Larry: The project will not be touching Williams' lines. Sandra: Will there be regular utility meetings? Ron: The City will provide comments on utility concerns. Who will be responsible for and pay for utility relocations? Keith: How will you widen the structure over the railroad tracks? Will the contractor work from the structure or from below on railroad property? Will there be an opportunity to cantilever? AGENCY SCOPING QUESTIONS Bellevue and Renton Nickel Project Environmental Assessments Agency Coordination Meeting January 25, 2005 - 9:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. Newcastle Community Room Newcastle, WA Issues/Questions/Comments Bellevue Project 1. Will you be defining the context for these specific projects within the overall corridor? (Ann Martin, KCDOT) 2. You've described this section of the Bellevue project as having a two-lane option at some point in future. When does the second lane come on line and how are you addressing the impacts for those future improvements? What additional measures are being considered? (Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Tribe) 3. How do the detention ponds get modified, if necessary, for road widening beyond these projects in the future? (Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Tribe) a. How are you going to avoid impacting what was built in the Nickel project when the future phases are built? Storm water ponds are an example; will the ponds being built now have the capacity to cover future phases or will they need to be rebuilt? 4. How will the project accommodate future stormwater treatment needs for quality/quantity? (Michael Grady, NOAA Fisheries) 5. The current design only accounts for a one -lane option. Given the restrictions in ROW, how are you going to accommodate future improvements? What additional measures are being accommodated now to allow for additional lanes in the future? Will you have enough ROW to accommodate future storm water needs? (Michael Grady, NOAA Fisheries) 6. Does any of this work tie in with WSDOT's watershed charecterization work that Dick Gersib is doing? (Jennifer Quan, USFWS) 7. Will you be doing enhanced water quality treatment? (Jennifer Quan, USFWS) 8. How extensive has been or will be your evaluation of construction impacts? For example, what about impacts to arterial streets and other access/circulation issues to local jurisdictions? If other issues are identified, will they need to be evaluated later? Agency Scoping Questions Bellevue/Renton Nickel Project Environmental Assessments Agency Coordination Meeting — January 25, 2005 Impacts will trigger other local agency codes/restrictions. (Rich Logwood, City of Bellevue) 9. Has a wetlands survey been completed? If so, what are the impacts? Specifically, how many acres of wetlands are present? (Kate Stenberg, USACE) a. How much of the project area has been examined to identify wetlands? b. What is the status of wetland takes? c. What other wetland delineations have been done besides around the tunnel? 10. Does the wetland survey differentiate between those storm water ponds that are built in wetlands? (Kate Stenberg, USACE) 11. The Wilburton Tunnel area provides a connection for wildlife (a key wildlife corridor) from Mercer Slough to the city of Bellevue's greenbelt system. Whatever design you come up with should maintain that connection. (Kate Stenberg, USACE) 12. Will the road widening cause impacts to the current HOV lane during construction? Since those lanes are essentially full currently during peak hour, I expect that there will be impacts. Since the HOV lane doesn't have a lot of capacity, any increase of traffic that you put into that lane will cause impacts. You may need to consider limiting the HOV lane to three persons, instead of the current two -person requirement. Will construction be during the 2007 to 2011 timeframe? (Ann Martin, KCDOT) 13. Have you thought about habitat connectivity along this stretch? You should actively check with the resource agencies that know the area. (Patty Betts, USEPA) 14. When we were developing the program for the corridor, we pursued getting the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad Right of Way (ROW) for future transportation uses. When we start talking about the Wilburton tunnel/lid, we should not preclude any future transportation uses — pedestrian path, elevated monorail, etc. If you do the wrong thing, we will lose it. (Leonard Newstrum, Town of Yarrow Point) 15. With regard to railroad right of way and it being considered for abandonment by BNSF, there is a letter to WSDOT that should be taken into consideration. There is some coordination with PSRC that is looking into land banking along that right of way. As far as wildlife, if there is a less demanding transportation use for some time, there may be ability to use the corridor in other ways (pedestrians, bicycles, wildlife). The project should coordinate with that work. (Ann Martin, KCDOT) 16. Are you tracking commitments made in the EIS? (Patty Betts, USEPA) 17. Do you want comments on NEPA/permitting? I echo Jennifer Quan's (USFWS) comments and the reference to Dick Gersib — we want the watershed analysis to consider that. (Mike Grady, NOAA Fisheries) Agency Scoping Questions Bellevue/Renton Nickel Project Environmental Assessments Agency Coordination Meeting — January 25, 2005 -2- a. NOAA fisheries would like a copy of watershed work done by WSDOT that covers the project area. 18. As you look at water quantity issues, put equal emphasis on base flows, in addition to dealing with peak flows. (Mike Grady, NOAA Fisheries) 19. Regarding the issue of on- and off -site mitigation sites, I have a concern about the tracking and monitoring of sites. There are a number of sites that have been identified for the 520 project and we want to make sure that this is a coordinated effort. Is there a central repository so that you can identify which mitigation can be counted to which project? (Mike Grady, NOAA Fisheries) 20. Regarding land use and cumulative effects, we'll be looking at indirect effects, which brings up the adequacy of land use ordinances. There is a patchwork of local jurisdictions and we'll need to address critical area ordinances and other local regulations. Specifically, some communities have good critical area ordinances, others do not. What are we going to do to help mitigate effects if the critical area ordinance or other regulations don't address? (Mike Grady, NOAA Fisheries) 21.On page 3, there is a list of potential mitigation activities dealing with aquatic resources. Sounds like what you're asking for are additional or specific ideas to enhance the list? Is that right? (Mike Grady, NOAA Fisheries) 22. I echo those comments made by Mike (Grady), Jennifer (Quan), and Kate (Stenberg) have said. For the issue of fish movement, you need to work closely with Bellevue city staff. Are the weirs working well for Kelsey Creek? This may be a place to concentrate future mitigation improvements. The Chinook and Coho are key species — need to look at impacts to reduced passage, how big are culverts, impacts of more storm water on them. (Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Tribe) 23. The project analysis needs to take a hard look at fish use of the stream systems. The analysis needs to look at a longer view with Bellevue staff, not a one-time fish survey look. The discipline report needs to include all additional information that has been developed. Please don't make me go to all the links where the information can be found, make sure you include all relevant past and current reports. (Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Tribe) 24. Residents are concerned about existing and future noise impacts. The city of Bellevue wants to create a trail connection with the BNSF ROW. Can you talk more about the lid versus the bridge over the Wilburton Tunnel? (Bernard Van de Kamp, City of Bellevue Transportation Department) 25. There will be a lot of impervious surface. (Bernard Van de Kamp, City of Bellevue Transportation Department) 26. I really appreciate Kate (Stenberg, USACE) bringing up the wildlife corridor. I didn't know we had that opportunity. The project should do a landscape analysis to identify what is moving through there. Also, the project needs to consider any upland habitat — Agency Scoping Questions Bellevue/Renton Nickel Project Environmental Assessments Agency Coordination Meeting — January 25, 2005 -3- forested areas — and needs to maintain those upland functions with specific attention to anything that has trees on it. Mitigating for some of that with an idea to enhance any wildlife corridor. From an ESA perspective — part of what Mike Grady was saying about indirect effects — we should discuss off line. (Jennifer Quan, USFWS) 27. I want to request a review of construction, maintenance, and operational impacts for ESA. (Jennifer Quan, USFWS) 28. Also pay attention to potential recovery needs for bull trout. There is a plan with a number of actions — it lists paths/conditions to Lake Washington and improving those conditions — water quality, habitat, etc. (Jennifer Quan, USFWS) 29. From reviewing the habitat connectivity areas, through maps, it looks like there are some wetlands on the east side of Kelsey Creek. Is there value in connecting this to Mercer Slough? Habitat connectivity includes amphibian and plants, not just larger animals. (Patty Betts, USEPA) 30. I'm also interested in the same issues that Mike Grady brought up, secondary impacts and local regulations. We want to be involved in any future discussions on that issue. For the cumulative and secondary effects, you can start with what you did earlier, check against the specific project, add to it, check assumptions and make changes accordingly. I hope that is the plan. Also, consider the construction impacts and cumulative impacts of other construction projects. (Patty Betts, USEPA) 31. For cumulative effects, I hope what can happen is that you can remind us, and those who weren't involved, of the conclusions that were already reached in the EIS so that we don't need to reinvent anything. Make sure you double check your assumptions and make sure you're still in the same range. (Ann Martin, KCDOT) 32. Regarding hazardous materials: Have any sensitive or contaminated soils been identified? Use of contaminated fill is an issue. Look at historical fill. (Rick Logwood, City of Bellevue) 33. Will comment forms be online? (Patty Betts, USEPA) 34. Will comments be attributed to individuals? (Patty Betts, USEPA) 35. When will the comments be ready? (Patty Betts, USEPA) 36. When does the project go to ad? (Not sure who asked this) Agency Scoping Questions Bellevue/Renton Nickel Project Environmental Assessments Agency Coordination Meeting — January 25, 2005 -4- Renton Project 1. Regarding Benson Road, will the existing road be removed? (Ann Martin, KCDOT) 2. Any removal of impervious surface that would be somehow altered or affected should be identified. (Ann Martin, KCDOT) 3. The team needs to note if filling is going to occur at Benson Road. There is a tributary on the backside of Sam's Club. Is the project going to reach that location? (Pat Klavas, MAP Team (WDFW) 4. Have traffic staff agreed to I V lanes? How does that affect the transportation analyses that were done for the corridor? Obviously, an 11' lane will not perform as well as 12' lane. Does it contribute to a higher accident rate? (Leonard Newstrum, Town of Yarrow Point) 5. Which streams in the project area fish bearing? (Ann Martin, KCDOT) 6. With regard to the lane reduction from 12' to 11', I think the analysis on the corridor EIS was based on 12' lanes. However, the project level document will consider the configuration that is being proposed. (Nick Afzali, City of Renton) 7. With regard to the Gilliam Creek detention pond, the detention pond seems to cut right through creek. Is there passage for fish through that enclosed detention area? (Jennifer Quan, USFWS) 8. I believe there is Coho use farther upstream at Gilliam Creek but am not sure of the details. (Karen Walters, Muckleshoot Tribe) a. Tukwila did an analysis on stormwater and they also found Coho further upstream. 9. (repeated for both projects) Will you be doing enhanced water quality treatment? (Jennifer Quan, USFWS) 10. (repeated for both projects) The team needs to consider any upland habitat, like forested areas, and how the project will maintain those upland functions with specific attention to habitat with trees. The team could mitigate for some impacts with the idea to enhance wildlife corridors. From an ESA perspective, part of what Mike Grady was saying about indirect effects, we should discuss off line. I want to request a review of construction maintenance and operational impacts for ESA. Also, the team needs to pay attention to the potential recovery needs for bull trout. There is a plan with a number of actions, it lists paths/conditions to Lake Washington and improving those conditions, like water quality, habitat, etc. (Jennifer Quan, USFWS) 11. Is the sole -source aquifer impacted by the Nickel project? (Sandra Meyer, City of Renton) 12. Are you going to touch Panther Creek? (Sandra Meyer, City of Renton) Agency Scoping Questions Bellevue/Renton Nickel Project Environmental Assessments Agency Coordination Meeting — January 25, 2005 -5- 13. Are you impacting (acquiring) any businesses or residences along the corridor? (Sandra Meyer, City of Renton) 14. There is overlap with a project we have on 167 (167 HOV project). That project does have impacts on the east side of SR 167. We need to look at logical termini, independent utility, and cumulative impacts. When the MAP Team went out, they did find resident fish in that system. I don't know the current plan for dealing with the culvert (please confirm which culvert) (Kate Stenberg, USACE) 15. F&W WAC is for all fish, not just salmonids, I have the same comments as Kate (Stenberg, USACE). (Pat Klavas, MAP Team) 16. With regard to the 43rd Street interchange, King County has done a lot of work to figure out solutions for this interchange. King County is concerned about making sure that this widening project is looked at from the perspective of what happens at that interchange and the impact on traffic even though it's not within the project area. (Ann Martin, KCDOT) 17. Springbrook discharges to the Black River. There is a pump station that restricts movement of salmon. (Allen Quynn, City of Renton) 18. There are two pollution containment ponds (the Renton Pollution Control Facility) on the west side of I-405 by Cedar River. Will they be impacted? (Allen Quynn, City of Renton) 19. What role will the contractors have with regard to advance mitigation? How will it all be coordinated? When will it happen? Are there other early actions that the contractor should be aware of? The contractors need to be kept up to speed on early environmental commitments. (Patty Betts, USEPA) 20. (repeated for both projects) Have you thought about habitat connectivity along this stretch? You should actively check with the resource agencies that know the area. (Patty Betts, USEPA) 21. (repeated for both projects) Are you tracking commitments made in the EIS? (Patty Betts, USEPA) 22. (repeated for both projects) For the cumulative and secondary effects, you can start with what you did for the corridor EIS and then do a comparison to the specific project. If necessary, add to the original cumulative effects and make changes accordingly. Also, consider the construction impacts and cumulative impacts of other construction projects. (Patty Betts, USEPA) 23. (repeated for both projects) Will comment forms be online? (Patty Betts, USEPA) 24. (repeated for both projects) Will comments in the scoping report be attributed to individuals? (Patty Betts, USEPA) 25. (repeated for both projects) When will the comments be ready? (Patty Betts, USEPA) Agency Scoping Questions Bellevue/Renton Nickel Project Environmental Assessments Agency Coordination Meeting — January 25, 2005 -6- 26. With regard to the mitigation bank, with the proposed impacts to how the water flows through on the SR 167 piece, has there been talk about rerouting flows? All that water goes to Springbrook Creek. If the volume of water changes entering Springbrook, will the flow changes impact the mitigation bank? (Kate Stenberg, USACE) 27. The current design only accounts for a one -lane option. Given the restrictions in ROW, how are you going to accommodate future improvements? What additional measures are being accommodated now to allow for additional lanes in the future? Will you have enough ROW for future projects? (Michael Grady, NOAA Fisheries) 28. (repeated for both projects) Do you want comments on NEPA/permitting? I echo Jennifer Quan's (USFWS) comments and the reference to Dick Gersib, we want the watershed analysis to consider that information. (Mike Grady, NOAA Fisheries) 29. (repeated for both projects) As you look at water quantity issues, put equal emphasis on base flows, in addition to dealing with peak flows. (Mike Grady, NOAA Fisheries) 30. (repeated for both projects) Regarding the issue of on- and off -site mitigation sites, I have a concern about the tracking and monitoring of sites. There are a number of sites that have been identified for the 520 project and I want to make sure that this is a coordinated effort. Is there a central repository so that you can identify which mitigation site will be counted towards a specific project? (Mike Grady, NOAA Fisheries) 31. (repeated for both projects) Regarding land use and cumulative effects, we'll be looking at indirect effects, which brings up the adequacy of land use ordinances. There is a patchwork of local jurisdictions and we'll need to address critical area ordinances and other local regulations. Specifically, some communities have good critical area ordinances, others do not. What are we going to do to help mitigate effects if the critical area ordinance or other regulations don't address? (Mike Grady, NOAA Fisheries) 32. (repeated for both projects) On page 3, there is a list of potential mitigation activities dealing with aquatic resources. Is the team asking for additional or specific ideas to enhance the list? (Mike Grady, NOAA Fisheries) 33. Are you going to retrofit for existing impervious area? Is it similar to Bellevue? (Mike Grady, NOAA Fisheries) 34. With regard to stormwater, I assume you're going to do water quality testing and identify the status of tributaries and link those to the WRIA planning efforts? Since you're not retrofitting, I propose you look at ways for Renton and Bellevue to look at limiting factors — water quality/quantity — to see to what extent you can enhance the treatments that have been currently proposed. In some areas this might mean doing less, in others doing more. (Mike Grady, NOAA Fisheries) Agency Scoping Questions Bellevue/Renton Nickel Project Environmental Assessments Agency Coordination Meeting — January 25, 2005 -7- 35. The downside of piecemealing is not capturing all the potential impacts. Have you looked at future Bellevue plans? Have you reached the 50% threshold with those future improvements (the Implementation Plan)? (Jennifer Quan, USFWS) 36. I will send formal comments. Think about the idea that some of the systems are limiting now (temperature, DO). They are not on the 303d list but need to be looked at in that context. Discipline reports need to pull this together and look at the net effect. Panther is on the 303d list and should be looked at for temperature and dissolved oxygen effects. The Department of Ecology is not present today but I would imagine that they would also like this information. (Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Tribe) 37. You need to look at mitigating velocity along with volumes and peak flows. Increased velocities are more problematic in simplified channels than in more complex systems. You need to look at it from a small fish's perspective, could they get away from those discharge areas? Look at increased volume, velocities and increased durations, not just peak flows. If you've improved the velocities, you still might have impacts to small fish because of extended flow duration. Increasing slower velocities is an important mitigation point to consider in this project. (Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Tribe) 38. This goes back to EPA's guidance on NEPA. The team needs to be looking not just at existing conditions but reflecting on what makes a functional system, not at only whether or not the project is better or worse than existing conditions. How does the project relate back to a functional system? (Patty Betts, USEPA) 39. NOAA Fisheries and USFWS released joint comments to revisions to the proposed stormwater manual that has been developed by the Department of Ecology. This speaks to the issues that Karen (Walter, Muckleshoot Tribe) just brought up. It also speaks to the lack of detention for the Cedar River. I will email an electronic copy if you like. (Jennifer Quan, USFWS) 40. Is the DOT stormwater manual comparable? (Allen Quynn, City of Renton) 41. The team needs to look at frequencies. Will they be kept the same? If not, you'll need to look at mitigation strategies. (Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Tribe) 42. The problem with looking only at peak and duration is that it doesn't look at impacts to fish. (Jennifer Quan, USFWS) 43. You are going to follow the Ecology standard, is that right? (Allen Quynn,City of Renton) 44. With regard to trying to tie stormwater treatment to the limiting factors related to fish and wildlife, is the team meeting the Ecology 2001 Stormwater Manual or DOT's Highway Runoff Manual? Both are being updated. We should focus more on what the fish and wildlife resources need and adapt the project to meet those needs. If we go with the prescriptive approach, we look at enhanced treatment. But it doesn't get you Agency Scoping Questions Bellevue/Renton Nickel Project Environmental Assessments Agency Coordination Meeting — January 25, 2005 -8- out of ESA box. The team needs to look at all the work that's been done — the WRIA efforts and the discipline reports. Then, focus on those areas that have needs and design the project to meet those needs. (Mike Grady, NOAA Fisheries) 45. The point from NEPA/SEPA is to analyze impacts regardless of gaps in laws and regulations. Just because it doesn't apply doesn't mean there is no impact. Look at it from the perspective of what does the system need? (Patty Betts, USEPA) 46. Timing is important. The draft recovery plans will be done (please confirm) late spring of this year. These will start to be implemented at the time you're coming out with your discipline reports. It will be a good opportunity to share information. (Mike Grady, NOAA Fisheries) 47. There is the need for coordination with the other SR 167 project. I believe there were some water quality issues. There is overlap going through that Panther Creek area. Need to coordinate them. (Doug Dobkins, Map TEAM) 48. DOT built a new stormwater facility at the I-405 and SR167 interchange. I hope someone is looking at how it functions and how it relates to this project. Will the Nickel project use this stormwater facility? (Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Tribe) 49. I am concerned about construction impacts on the HOV lane. Demand management might create some good response, especially with 167. We should consider these comments for SR 518, at least as they apply. (Ann Martin, KCDOT) 50. (repeated for both projects) Will the road widening cause impacts to the current HOV lane during construction? Since those lanes are essentially full currently during peak hour, I expect that there will be impacts. Since the HOV lane doesn't have a lot of capacity, any increase of traffic that you put into that lane will cause impacts. You may need to consider limiting the HOV lane to three persons, instead of the current two -person requirement. Will this be constructed during the 2007 to 2011 timeframe? (Ann Martin, KCDOT) 51. Are you developing scopes of work for some of these areas? Is there an opportunity to look at the scopes of work for NEPA? It would be helpful. Is there an opportunity to provide feedback on defining the baseline and what projects are going to be considered for cumulative effects? I would like to be able to continent now rather than later. (Patty Betts, USEPA) 52. Are there any utility issues along the corridor? (Allen Quynn, City of Renton) 53. Will you be providing initial drafts of the discipline reports for agency review? (Bernard Van DeCamp, City of Bellevue Transportation) 54. The BA is starting before the discipline reports are complete. Are you sticking to that schedule? (Mike Grady, NOAA Fisheries) Agency Scoping Questions Bellevue/Renton Nickel Project Environmental Assessments Agency Coordination Meeting — January 25, 2005 -9- 55. The design freeze in spring seems pretty close. There still seems to be many issues that need to be resolved. (Leonard Newstrum, City of Bellevue Transportation Department) 56. Fifteen percent of design will be sketchy. So, you'll have sketchy design plus the design requirements document to provide to the contractor? (Leonard Newstrum, City of Bellevue Transportation Department) 57. Do we ever get to see the design requirements document? (Leonard Newstrum, City of Bellevue Transportation Department) 58. My concern about design build is that if you don't know all the specifics, it's hard to do the analysis. (Mike Grady, NOAA Fisheries) 59. The tribe will provide technical comments. If there are impacts to fishing, that's another issue. What we typically do is discuss those issues with the Corps through their permitting process. We predicate those based on what you told us was the project. If it's different, all bets are off. I'm not involved in ESA consultation. I need to be kept up on the information. After today, there is no place for us in the fishing and fisheries area. Not sure how the info will come to me. But need to be kept informed so that in the end, I don't raise red flags. (Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Tribe) 60. The tribes can be at the table during the ESA consultation at the discretion of the agency. My preference would be to have them involved in the ESA consultation. (Mike Grady, NOAA Fisheries) 61. When you get to the public notice stage that is too far down the road. Bring the tribes in early in the process. (Kate Stenberg, USACE) 62. Suggestion to provide organizational chart and team contact information in the binder. (Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Tribe) Agency Scoping Questions Bellevue/Renton Nickel Project Environmental Assessments Agency Coordination Meeting — January 25, 2005 -10- + 41►�i1�1��1► ► Meeting Type: ► Meeting Date: ► Meeting Place: ► � Attendees: I-405 Utilities Kickoff Meeting - Bellevue Nickel Segment and West Valley Highway to Maple Valley Highway Nickel Segment January 19, 2005 Bellevue, Rainier Rm ► Time: 10:30AM-NOON A Ross Fenton / 1-405 Eric Nyce / 1-405 A Will Dronen/ 360 Networks A Ron Ohlsen / 1-405 Jeff McMeekin / PSE A Dennis G. / Plantec A BruceDibert / 1-405 Jill Look / Comcast A Louise Popelka /MCI A Randy Norberg / 1-405 Scott Smith / Qwest A Michael Fulmer / MCI A Garth Merrill 11405 Ken Kobes / Qwest 16 Abe Santos / Bellevue Karen Comings / 1-405 Susan Michard /KC WTD # Bob Giberson / Tukwila Douglas MacAskill / 1-405 Sarah Gagnon/ KC ROW A Mike Cusick /Tukwila Ghassan S. / UCO Melanie Wheeler / Qwest P Ryan Larson / Tukwila Agenda Items] & 2 - Introduction, Overview, Scope and Schedule 1. Bruce opened the meeting with introductions 2. West Valley to Maple Valley (So Renton/Tukwila) Segment. Ross provided overview of Nickel Project. Described design approach as design -build (DB) program where design is developed to 15% and placed in contract bid documents (RFP) and the design -builder completes the design and builds the project. The scope of the Nickel project was presented with figures on the wall for viewing. The schedule was explained, with an RFP anticipated for April of 2007, Notice to Proceed in November 2007, Ground Breaking in February 2008, and Construction Completion around the end of 2010. The Renton Nickel Improvement Project involves construction of 12' (24' in some areas) of additional pavement along the outside edge of certain northbound and southbound sections of existing I-405 between I-5 and SR 169, and southbound SR 167 between the 41" Street off ramp and the I-405 / SR 167 Interchange. There are subsequent I-405 and SR 167 improvement phases planned which would also affect existing utilities, however, these phases are not funded at the present time and are less well defined. If a particular utility requires relocation due to improvements planned under the `Nickel' project, the Agencies were encouraged to discuss such improvements with the I-405 Team to try and minimize / avoid subsequent shifts of the affected utility. A Teri Hallauer/SPU RES A Bob Gambill /SPU RES Joe Herold / SPU A Charlie Madden / SPU i • 3. Bellevue Segment. Ron provided overview of Nickel Project. The scope of the Nickel project was presented with figures on the wall for viewing. The schedule was explained, with an RFP anticipated for October 2006 and construction starting possibly the middle of 2007 but more than likely late 2007 to early 2008. It is noted that our legislative dates are much later with an RFP date of October 2007 and an End of Construction date of June 2011. It is also noted that the early dates could be further accelerated as necessary. The I-405 Bellevue Nickel Project will add one northbound lane between I-90 and SE 8" Street and one southbound lane between NE 4`" Street and I-90. The project reconstructs the Wilburton Tunnel and two bridges will also be widened in this project, one northbound over the BNSF railroad and one southbound over SE 8`" Street. The existing outside HOV lane will be extended to the vicinity of the SE 8`" Street Interchange. 4. Both of these projects are fully funded by the State with the nickel gas tax. There are no Federal Funds involved.. Agenda Item3 - WSDOT Utility Concerns for Design 1. The design -build contract is new process for WSDOT and the contract process is still being defined to meet both WSDOT needs and the laws pertaining to utilities. 2. A base map of utilities has been prepared from permit documents on file at WSDOT and was mailed to attendees. / ) Earliest possible identification and verification of conflicts (�_// is the desired outcome from these meetings. Utilities were requested to please have confirmed utilities provided to WSDOT (Randy) by Feb 18`h2005. This will enable design to proceed with identifying conflicts. 4. Desire is to have conflicting utilities relocated prior to,,,, Contract RFP if possible. If not, the WSDOT contract text b development may include providing relocation criteria such as work windows, review times, design standards, preferred subcontractors, to get plans completed, inspectionL requirements etc. This is a heads -up for potential �� ` r information that would be required from the utilities should �� 4 S relocation work be planned during the contract. The text criteria would be included in both an agreement with the WSDOT and included in the contract text. 5. Question asked as to who was responsible for environmental permits for relocations. WSDOT is looking into how this will be handled, whether the environmental documentation and permits . for WSDOT would include the N • utility relocation work or WSDOT project will coordinate the utility effort in obtaining the needed environmental permits of their work. The utilities expressed they rather have WSDOT project include the utility -environmental permits as part of the project.. Agenda Item 4 - Current Identified Potential Conflicts The base map indicates all utilities on file with WSDOT permits. Section or profiles were provided of most utilities that were seen as possibly in conflict. The sections indicated where widening was to take place: 1. Once existing utilities have been confirmed, conflicting ones will need to be investigated closer. As-builts will be requested to allow design team to evaluate in greater detail. 2. The I-405 bridge structures being expanded were described, but all work will be within the existing right of way, except storm water treatment facilities. Agenda Item S — WSDOT Needs from Utilities 1. To summarize, WSDOT requests utility owners to review base map and figures for accuracy with their records and reply with marked up figures within 2 weeks. The markup information would include, for example, current owners, utilities not indicated on the base map, revisions from permit documents, confirming the physical location of their utilities in relation to base map location, easements, prior rights, expired permits, and planned work 2. WSDOT requests utility owners provide copy of current franchise documents that conflict with what WSDOT has on record (base map) to confirm location of facility within ROW, and 3. Any easements associated with permits. Actions Requested WSDOT Several attendees requested copies of Base Maps. Randy will get these to them. Electronic files in MicroStation format are available on request. UTILITIES Mark-ups of base maps confirming data indicated on franchise permits within 2 weeks. Data on any easements associated franchises listed nntas nra nn intarnratatinn of rlisri icsinn-, haul Plaasa nrnvirla anv arirlitinn z nr rnrrartinnc to tha nrininntnr within F nave of tho rinto signed; otherwise they will be assumed correct as written. Responses WSDOT Several attendees were mailed copies of Base Maps. Electronic files in MicroStation format are available on request. ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS WSDOT is not planning on including utility relocations in our permits. These notes are an interpretation of discussions held. Please provide any additions or corrections to the originator within 5 days of the date signed; otherwise they will be assumed correct as written ► Prepared by: Randy Norberg Date: January 19, 2005 Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects Nickel Plus Transportation Partnership Account-$1.5 B 1-5 to SR 169 (figures in millions) .,. Nickel10 2003-2012 Partners ip Account 2005.2017 South Renton Nickel Projects .......................136 1-5 to SR 181................................................................................30 NB SR167toSR169..................................................................20 SR 515 Interchange...................................................................110 SR 167 SB: 1405 to SE 180th (1 lane)........................................50 SR 169 to 1-90 NE 44th to 112th Ave.................................................................150* 112thAve to 1-90..........................................................................20 1-90 to SR 520 Bellevue Nickel Projects: 1-90 to SE 8th ........185 NB NE 8th to SR 520 Braided Crossing.....................................250 NE 10th Overcrossing..................................................................67 SR520toSR522 Kirkland Nickel Projects................................164 NE 124th to SR 522...................................................................170 NE 132nd Interchange.................................................................60 SR 522 to SR 527 NB 195th to SR 527 (1 lane)........................................................45 Totals: Nickel2003-2012 .........................485 2005 Account.............................................................972 1-405 Corridor Total State Investment.................................1,457 * Match for regional funding package. Adw April 25, 2005 wpait "ant ofaTransportation Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects Subject: 1-405 Scoping Meeting with CiV of Renton Airport Project: 1-405 Renton Meeting Date: 04.27.05 Meeting Location: Quonset Hut, 790 West Perimeter Rd (Airport) Notes by: Lisa K'os Attendees: Alan Black 1-405 Stormwater Engineer Lisa Kjos 1-405 Stormwater Brad Thiele 1-405 Biologist (Discipline Report Writer) Sandra Meyer City of Renton, Director Transportation Division Ryan Zulauf City of Renton, Airport Manager Cayla Morgan FAA MEETING NOTES ■ Review Nickel stormwater facility locations for S. Renton segment. Also, discussed stormwater -- facility locations for the Implementation phase and anticipated additional Nickel work due to the recent gas tax approval. ■ Upon review of the proposed Nickel plan, both the City of Renton and FAA felt that the design (long linear slender detention ponds and distance from the airport for wetland mitigation areas) did not represent any concerns, Ryan was most interested in assuring that the design minimized attraction for heron, eagles, geese, seagulls, and any other wildlife. The discussion included current issues concerning resident geese lingering between the taxiway and the runway, and there is an existing flight path for heron crossing the runway's south end between a large rookery area and the Black River pump station and the shallow areas of Lake Washington (seasonal when the lake is low in the summer). The current 1-405 does not worsen these concerns and does not appear to create new ones. ■ There were two 1-405 project ponds that have potential to become areas of concern - one at the stormwater facility site for Option E in the vicinity of SR 515 and the second south of 1-405 in the vicinity of Lind. Both sites propose ponds that are more circular in nature. It was requested by both the City of Renton and FAA that the project coordinate with Mike Linnet (USDA Wildlife Hazard Manager, (360) 753-9884) and/or Lawrence Schafer (Biologist) with USDA, Wildlife Service's Division to determine an acceptable design to minimize wildlife concerns. It was stated that both the City of Renton and FAA would concur with any design that was acceptable by USDA. ... Washington State Department' Transpportation age 1 of 1 170ocuments and Settingslab1acMLoca1 SeftingslTemoorary Internet Fi1es10LKDWtg Notes 04.27.05 2.6oc 1pternet LC2,4k4#904 n7.0514es Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects 600 - 108th Avenue NE, Suite 405 MECElVED Malin 425 456 85500 Fax 425-456-8600 MAY 2 7 2005 May 26, 2005 CITY OF MS: NB82-250 UTILITY RENTON Dear Recipient, SYSTEMS Thank you for your recent involvement in the Renton Nickel Improvement Project scoping process. You may have heard that Governor Christine Gregoire and the Washington State Legislature recently passed legislation that will provide $8.5 billion for major mobility and safety improvements to our state's transportation network. What this means for 1-405 is $972 million in additional funding for improvements in key locations along the corridor. In response to these changes the Renton Nickel Improvement Project Environmental Assessment (EA) scope has been modified. Additional improvements within the project study area will relieve congestion chokepoints, enhance safety and increase commuter travel speeds. The 2005 funding package will provide funding for additional improvements to 1-405 between 1-5 and SR 169 (Maple Valley Highway): • One lane northbound between 1-5 and SR 181 (West Valley Highway). • One lane northbound between SR 167 and SR 169. The modified Renton EA scope will also study the addition of one southbound lane on 1-405 from SR 167 to SR 181, though this addition to the EA is unfunded at this time. Washington State Department of Transportation invites you to comment on these additional improvements. Please provide written comments by June 15, 2005 so that they may be reviewed. Please write to: Allison Ray 1-405 Project Environmental Manager -or- rayallina wsdot.wa.gov 600 —1081h Ave. NE, Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004 If you would like additional information about the improvements to 1-405 between 1-5 and SR 169 (Maple Valley Highway), please visit the project web site at www.wsdot.wa.gov/projects/i405, or contact me at the number below. Sincerely, Allison ay 1-405 Project Environmental Manager 425-456-8610 rayalli(dwsdot.wa.gov Washington State v, Department of Transportation 1° �g� � � J� � ��o 7CS z - r� • � a - r -n CD C y G S 71 IN rl �' ✓ Q � 6` N Ul 4 � � ✓I 1 "t � � NI -P 0 W N c� A� , 1 t tv t iii b` �,� �o J ty �, v e� -� -� op �I r A f c A c - ' j (A3 c 1 �, 0Z 3 ' t✓ c� vq c ` o ca m n 1 ,�` ^ r4 N Ci rb rn a Ls;l N 2 r N Z 'n CD y r+ c0 C 00 y c0 Z � c N c m 3 a� Allen Qu nn - Re Review iew and Reminder: 405 Bellevue/Renton Nickel Project Ageri.9yScoping Comments Page 1 From: Michael Grady <Michael.Grady@noaa.gov> To: "Ray, Allison" <RayAlli@wsdot.wa.gov> Date: 2/2/2005 10:23:43 AM Subject: Re: Review and Reminder: 405 Bellevue/Renton Nickel Project Agency Scoping Comments The summary looks fine. Our concerns are as follows: 1. Linking the level and effectiveness of stormwater treatment for water quality and quantity effects to the limiting factors of the local tributaries (see draft recovery plans). 2. Retrofitting existing impervious surfaces for water quality and quantity treatment. 3. Designing stormwater systems to accommodate the eventual addition of additional lanes in either direction --consistent with the EIS. 4. Using watershed -based analyses to identify on- or off -site opportunities for riparian protection or enhancement. Track the projects with a centralized and accessible database for all Urban Corridors projects. Thanks for the opportunity to comment at this stage. Mike Grady (206) 526-4645 "Ray, Allison" wrote: > Attached are the meeting notes from the agency scoping meeting on January > 25th for the 405 Bellevue and Renton Nickel Improvement Projects. If you > attended the meeting, please review the attachment and provide your edits in > tracking mode, and return your comments to me no later than COB this Friday, > February 4th. Also, attached is a pdf with the list of attendees and their > email addresses. Please note that my name is not on the attendee list, but > you can find my contact information below. > Please note that all comments on the 405 Bellevue and Renton Nickel > Improvement Projects are due by COB on Thursday, February 10th. You can send > comments on the Bellevue Nickel Improvement Project to Paul Krueger, and > comments on the Renton Nickel Improvement Project should be sent to me. > Please send comments for both Paul and I to the following address: > 600 108th Avenue NE, Suite 405 > Bellevue, WA 98004-9800 > Please let me know if you have any questions. > Thank you, > Allison Ray > WSDOT - Project Environmental Manager > 425-456-8610 (phone) > 206-714-1548 (cell) > rayalli@wsdot.wa.gov <mailto:rayalli@wsdot.wa.gov> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Name: finalagencyquestions.doc > finalagencyquestions.doc Type: WINWORD File (application/msword) > Encoding: base64 Allen Quynn - Re Review and Reminder: 405 Bellevue/Renton Nickel Project Agency §coping Comments Page 2 > Download Status: Not downloaded with message > Name: 01.25.05 Agency Scoping Sign -in Sheet.pdf > 01.25.05 Agency Scoping Sign -in Sheet.pdf Type: Acrobat (application/pdf) > Encoding: base64 > Download Status: Not downloaded with message CC: "Wolen, Eric" <EricW@HNTB.COM>, "Donna Hogerhuis (E-mail)" <donna.hogerhuis@muckleshoot.nsn.us>, <john.danielsjr@muckleshoot.nsn.us>, "Karen Walter(E-mail)" <kwalter@muckleshoot.nsn.us>, <laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us>, <Kelliekvasnikoff@Snoqualmienation.com>, <ian@Snoqualmienation.com>, "Mathis, Daniel (FHWA)" <daniel.math is@fhwa.dot.gov>, "Leonard, James (FHWA)" <James.Leonard@fhwa.dot.gov>, "Gehrke, Linda" <linda.gehrke@fta.dot.gov>, "Love, Sharon (FHWA)" <Sharon.Love@fhwa.dot.gov>, "Witmer, John" <john.witmer@fta.dot.gov>, "Bowman, Jennifer" <jennifer.bowman @fta.dot. gov>, "Kate Stenberg Ph.D (E-mail)"<kathryn.j.stenberg@usace.army. mil>, "Nancy Brennan-Dubbs(E-mail)" <Nancy_BrennanDubbs@r1.fws.gov>, <Suzy_Lutey@r1.fws.gov>, "Quan, Jennifer" <Jennifer_quan@fws.gov>, "Callahan, Sean" <sean.callahan@noaa.gov>, "Judith Lee (E-mail)" <Lee.Judith@epamail.epa.gov>, <pbet461@ecy.wa.gov>, <betts.patty@epamail.epa.gov>, "Terry Swanson (E-mail)" <tswa461@ecy.wa.gov>, "Ann Martin (E-mail)" <ann.martin@metrokc.gov>, "Bernard Van de Kamp (E-mail)" <bvandekamp@ci.bellevue.wa.us>, "Kim Becklund (E-mail)" <KBecklund@ci.bellevue.wa.us>, <DAnderson@ci.kirkland.wa.us>, <pstewart@ci.kirkland.wa.us>, <dgodfrey@ci.kirkland.wa.us>, "Brooks, Allyson" <AllysonB@cted.wa.gov>, "Kurt Buchanan (E-mail)" <buchakdb@dfw.wa.gov>, "Ray Hellwig (E-mail)" <rhel461 @ecy.wa.gov>, 'John Anderson <johna@pscleanair.org>, 'Joan Cabreza <cabreza.joan@epa.gov>, 'Don Cairns <dcairns@redmond.gov>, "'Paul D. Car" <paulc@pscleanair.org>, 'Paul Cornish <cornishp@soundtransit. org>, <tulla@soundtransit.org>, "Cushman, King" <kcushman@psrc.org>, "Beaulieu, Peter" <pbeaulieu@psrc.org>, 'Larry Howard <townhall@ci.yarrow-point.wa.us>, 'Nancy Joseph <nancy.joseph@wadnr.gov>, 'Terry Marpert <tmarpert@ci.red mond.wa.us>, 'Fred McConkey <fred.mcconkey@mcconkeydev.com>, "'Joseph O. Mullen" <Snoqualmie1855@aol.com>, 'Alan Newbill <anewbill@ci.yarrow-point.wa.us>, <Inewstrum@blarg.net>, 'Doug Schulze <dschulze@medina-wa.gov>, 'Goran Sparrman <gsparrman@ci.bellevue.wa.us>, <FLoewenherz@ci.bellevue.wa.us>, 'Jennifer Ziegler <zieglj@wsdot.wa.gov>, <fritzt@ci.newcastle.wa.us>, <nafzali@ci.renton.wa.us>, <smeyer@ci.renton.wa.us>, <gzimmerman@ci.renton.wa.us>, <smulhall@ci.renton.wa.us>, <jmorrow@ci.tukwila.wa.us>, <bshelton@ci.tukwila.wa.us>, <deb.symmonds@ci.mercer-island.wa.us>, <dwickstrom@ci.kent.wa.us>, "'dts@eskimo.com'"' <dts@eskimo.com>, "'jerry@yakima.com <jerry@yakima.com>, "'johnson@yakima.com"" <johnson@yakima.com>, "'mose@yakima.com <mose@yakima.com>, 'doug' <dobkins@metrokc.gov>, "'klavaspk@dfw.wa.gov <klavaspk@dfw.wa.gov>, "'jamesw@ci.newcastle.wa.us"' <jamesw@ci.newcastle.wa.us>, "'lonard.f.newstrum@boeing.com'"' <leonard.f.newstrum@boeing.com>, 'john' <hasty@ci.renton.wa.us>, I'laquynn@ci.renton.wa.us"" <aquynn@ci.renton.wa.us>, "'rlogwood@ci.bellevue.wa.us <rlogwood@ci.bellevue.wa.us>, "'mpainie@ci.bellevue.wa.us"' <mpain ie@ci.bellevue.wa.us>, "'smulhad@ci.renton.wa.us"' <smulhad@ci.renton.wa.us>, "'jeffj@ci.newcastle.wa.us <jeffj@ci.newcastle.wa.us>, "'cknighton@ci.renton.wa.us"' <cknighton@ci.renton.wa.us>, Igarrich@ci.bellevue.wa.us"' <lgarrich@ci.bellevue.wa.us>, "Krueger, Paul W" <KruegeP@wsdot.wa.gov> r � 11 1:1 MWL ► Meeting Type: ► Meeting Date: ► Meeting Place: ► Attendees: Lille I-405 Utilities Kickoff Meeting - Bellevue Nickel Segment and West Valley Highway to Maple Valley Highway Nickel Segment January 19, 2005 Bellevue, Rainier Rm ► Time: Ross Fenton /1-405 # Eric Nyce/1-405 Will Dronen/360Networks Ron Ohlsen / 1-405 A Jeff McMeekin / PSE Dennis G. / Plantec BruceDibert/1-405 Jill Look/Comcast Louise Popelka/MCI Randy Norberg / 1405 Scott Smith / Qwest Michael Fulmer / MCI Garth Merrill / 1405 Ken Kobes / Qwest Abe Santos / Bellevue Karen Comings / 1405 Susan Michard /KC WTD # Bob Giberson / Tukwila Douglas MacAskill / 1405 Sarah Gagnon/KC ROW # Mike Cusick /Tukwila A Ghassan S. / UCO Melanie Wheeler / Qwest 1 Ryan Larson / Tukwila Agenda Items] & 2 - Introduction, Overview, Scope and Schedule 1. Bruce opened the meeting with introductions 2. West Valley to Maple Valley (So Renton/Tukwila) Segment. Ross provided overview of Nickel Project. Described design approach as design -build (DB) program where design is developed to 15% and placed in contract bid documents (RFP) and the design -builder completes the design and builds the project. The scope of the Nickel project was presented with figures on the wall for viewing. The schedule was explained, with an RFP anticipated for April of 2007, Notice to Proceed in November 2007, Ground Breaking in February 2008, and Construction Completion around the end of 2010. The Renton Nickel Improvement Project involves construction of 12' (24' in some areas) of additional pavement along the outside edge of certain northbound and southbound sections of existing I-405 between I-5 and SR 169, and southbound SR 167 between the 41" Street off ramp and the I-405 / SR 167 Interchange. There are subsequent I-405 and SR 167 improvement phases planned which would also affect existing utilities, however, these phases are not funded at the present time and are less well defined. If a particular utility requires relocation due to improvements planned under the Nickel' project, the Agencies were encouraged to discuss such improvements with the I-405 Team to try and minimize / avoid subsequent shifts of the affected utility. 10:30AM-NOON Teri Hallauer/SPU RES Bob Gambill /SPU RES A Joe Herold / SPU Charlie Madden / SPU M1:1 :101►KML1D 3. Bellevue Segment. Ron provided overview of Nickel Project. The scope of the Nickel project was presented with figures on the wall for viewing. The schedule was explained, with an RFP anticipated for October 2006 and construction starting possibly the middle of 2007 but more than likely late 2007 to early 2008. It is noted that our legislative dates are much later with an RFP date of October 2007 and an End of Construction date of June 2011. It is also noted that the early dates could be further accelerated as necessary. The I-405 Bellevue Nickel Project will add one northbound lane between I-90 and SE 8`h Street and one southbound lane between NE 4`h Street and I-90. The project reconstructs the Wilburton Tunnel and two bridges will also be widened in this project, one northbound over the BNSF railroad and one southbound over SE 8`h Street. The existing outside HOV lane will be extended to the vicinity of the SE 8`h Street Interchange. 4. Both of these projects are fully funded by the State with the nickel gas tax. There are no Federal Funds involved.. Agenda Item3 - WSDOT Utility Concerns for Design 1. The design -build contract is new process for WSDOT and the contract process is still being defined to meet both WSDOT needs and the laws pertaining to utilities. 2. A base map of utilities has been prepared from permit documents on file at WSDOT and was mailed to attendees. 3. Earliest possible identification and verification of conflicts is the desired outcome from these meetings. Utilities were requested to please have confirmed utilities provided to WSDOT (Randy) by Feb 18`h2005. This will enable design to proceed with identifying conflicts. 4. Desire is to have conflicting utilities relocated prior to Contract RFP if possible. If not, the WSDOT contract text development may include providing relocation criteria such as work windows, review times, design standards, preferred subcontractors, to get plans completed, inspection requirements etc. This is a heads -up for potential information that would be required from the utilities should relocation work be planned during the contract. The text criteria would be included in both an agreement with the WSDOT and included in the contract text. 5. Question asked as to who was responsible for environmental permits for relocations. WSDOT is looking into how this will be handled, whether the environmental documentation and permits . for WSDOT would include the N ion work or WSDOT project will coordinate 7the7utility ort in obtaining the needed environmental pir work. The utilities expressed they rather have WSDOT project include the utility -environmental permits as part of the project.. Agenda Item 4 - Current Identified Potential Conflicts The base map indicates all utilities on file with WSDOT permits. Section or profiles were provided of most utilities that were seen as possibly in conflict. The sections indicated where widening was to take place: 1. Once existing utilities have been confirmed, conflicting ones will need to be investigated closer. As-builts will be requested to allow design team to evaluate in greater detail. 2. The I-405 bridge structures being expanded were described, but all work will be within the existing right of way, except storm water treatment facilities. Agenda Item 5 — WSDOT Needs from Utilities 1. To summarize, WSDOT requests utility owners to review base map and figures for accuracy with their records and reply with marked up figures within 2 weeks. The markup information would include, for example, current owners, utilities not indicated on the base map, revisions from permit documents, confirming the physical location of their utilities in relation to base map location, easements, prior rights, expired permits, and planned work 2. WSDOT requests utility owners provide copy of current franchise documents that conflict with what WSDOT has on record (base map) to confirm location of facility within ROW, and 3. Any easements associated with permits. Actions Requested WSDOT Several attendees requested copies of Base Maps. Randy will get these to them. Electronic files in MicroStation format are available on request. 1 NIMMILAMORS UTILITIES Mark-ups of base maps confirming data indicated on franchise permits within 2 weeks. Data on any easements associated franchises listed These notes are an interpretation of discussions held. Please provide any additions or corrections to the originator within 5 days of the date signed; otherwise they will be assumed correct as written. Responses WSDOT Several attendees were mailed copies of Base Maps. Electronic files in MicroStation format are available on request. ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS WSDOT is not planning on including utility relocations in our permits. These notes are an interpretation of discussions held. Please provide any additions or corrections to the originator within 5 days of the date signed; otherwise they will be assumed correct as written ► Prepared by: Randy Norberg Date: January 19, 2005 How does the 1-405 Implementation Plan complement ongoing Metro and Sound Transit Improvements along the Corridor? The 1-405 Program is about improving people's ability to get from place to place. More than 150 different projects —including general purpose, freight, and high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane improvements, new Park and Ride lots, and additional van and buses will accommodate users' choices, regardless of their preferred mode. HOV Lane Improvements With 60 miles of HOV lanes already in use, 1-405 offers carpools, vanpools and transit buses a less congested option northbound and southbound the entire length of the corridor. During peak periods, HOV lanes carry up to half the people on 1-405. The Implementation Plan brings new access ramps to those HOV lanes, so travelers don't have to weave through lanes of traffic to exit the highway. Improvements: a new freeway to freeway HOV ramp to connect the SR 167 HOV lane to the north on 1-405, In -line transit stations at 112th Ave. SE in Bellevue, NE 85th St. in Kirkland and Brickyard near Bothell. Sound Transit has several Direct Access projects funded in the 1-405 corridor, including the Totem Lake Freeway Station at NE 128th St., Bellevue at NE 6th St. and N 8th St. near Renton/Boeing. Park and Ride Capacity Increases Along 1-405, there are nine Park and Ride lots, and many other lots that are accessible to the corridor. The 1-405 Implementation Plan provides for 2,350 additional Park and Ride spaces to encourage transit and carpool riders. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Carpools, vanpools, commute trip reduction, telecommuting, outreach programs, leased Park and Ride spaces —all of these transportation enhancements are encompassed in Washington State's TDM program — one of the strongest in the U.S. In fact, 80% of HOV lane users on 1-405 are carpools and vanpools. Transit Improvements A number of transit improvements will take shape in the Implementation Plan — these include transit stations and coaches that will complement current services as well as develop the BRT line. Eventl SINan FaM-eM-Fqe Improvements planned for the n Implementation Plan phase of 1-405, are °°"'st— to develop a new BRT line that will w- "m°"' i,xe saiw" eventually run in the HOV lanes along the O BRT Statb H�, ° aKK entire length of 1-405. Connections to other transit routes will occur at stations along P°rkaM-Ftle the corridor, most of which will allow 5 passengers to get on and off without the a m� BRT coach ever leaving the freeway. WSDOT, Sound Transit, King County Metro and Community Transit are working on integrated transit improvement projects up and down 1-405. These projects are designed to work together enhancing I-405 as a multimodal corridor. Adw Washington State �AP Department of Transportation What Environmental Benefits will 1-405 Improvements Provide? Engineered Flow Control Example: stormwater detention pond Restoring Natural Flow Control Example: wetlands restoration Watershed -Based Planning Building new lanes on 1-405 will create additional surface water runoff that must be captured and cleaned. In the past, stormwater detention ponds, such as the one pictured on the left, have been used. Stormwater detention ponds capture and store water runoff before it reaches a stream system. While methods like this manage water quality and quantity, they are expensive to build, focus on minimizing negative impacts, and provide only the minimal required benefits. A better potential solution is to create a wetlands restoration site, pictured to the right. Capturing surface water upstream from the highway and detaining it in a more natural environment focuses on maximizing positive impacts to the watershed and can achieve additional environmental benefits at the same or less cost. WSDOT is employing this new approach on a variety of highway projects throughout the State. Benefits: • Targets environmental improvement investments to those areas that will have the greatest long-term environmental benefit (vs. providing short-term spot treatments) • Addresses how the watershed is functioning as a whole, rather than looking solely at the impact site and making minor improvements • Provides opportunities to restore natural processes, making the watershed more biologically productive and reducing long-term maintenance costs around streams and wetlands • Uses resources more efficiently. The 1-405 project team is conducting cost - benefit analyses on conventional vs. alternative mitigation options • Costs less in challenging topography, such as steep slopes, high groundwater or wetlands WSDOT is currently working on project -level environmental assessments to ensure that the project will avoid or compensate for environmental impacts. If you'd like to learn more, or be part of this process, please consider attending a scoping meeting in your area (www wsdot wa gov/projects/1-405) New Methods New watershed characterization methods integrate the mitigation of wetland, riparian, floodplain, and stormwater impacts by restoring the landscape's capacity to provide necessary functions, while increasing the environmental benefits. Early Environmental Investments As part of WSOOT's environmental commitment, the environmental team continues to investigate opportunities for early environmental investments along the corridor. The team is currently working with jurisdictions to identify sites that have potential for early development of mitigation projects that will offer the most environmental benefit for the dollar. Washington State �� Department of Transportation E C c � -0 1= co C v O m E o 2 0 v m L m +r bA i o c n a�Ni n E cn 0 o c c c= N LO 6 0 `2 � @ o � � m @ aoi c�Ca U 3 h Y U O > c a) by a) L A YI to 6R C O It 6>i n E a) — O N L> O O-a N acu n p O C 0 'tm s O m CD- o o OU a) + L)n C � c 1 C U_ m > O O a) a) bA cp C �p w - c a) Q > L L C +J C +. C O d a) E 'O C n m C O C L O-0 0 L p o n U U N c ' 0 O o n .+� L �'' N m an a) ` c�v n O n L m 3 c N n O O a) O c L — O M U c0 O 'O O w O' •N �}� C Q) U ''' `° m a � � � an o a) m O ^ a) E E '� ai m a o m 0 O o ai °n L m F Y c > o L o n V)� O aci E a) �Q a) m cv c m Y m } c +� a a) (n .� oU _ L > O bD C 3 0 _ a) m o L a) a C °� co 0 3 m a) °� — aci L +' cv - a) o n C a 3 O +`� N ,U a) a) o U O a a) U > O 6 �A U a) a) a) ao c E cam° O o v- `� M— C O =3 L ~ L vi ' 1 Cl)+ O a) L A c i N V) m } m c O Fu N Lo ~ +� Q m m 3 a) c O _ Y '� a) E O m cca a) O C O Q) (n a) c 1 a) v > @ Y u L +� ! 'U o -0 Y O Y cn . +• N + - V a c C = U a) a) = a) c O y N U U n (n > > V) +, c > a) L c}mv a) ami o� c m c = O n O n cz E O a) n n c m .� o = o D o - a 0 N O E E U o E o v �'n vmi a) .N cu U aCL)) (n c U U LT U (n U O a) ccv — V)c O L a) a) -0 +� O m Q m E m c� N LO W ¢ m z a ~ 2E H U)vi Q Ld Ld a_ D a U) a_ c O ■A, MMW W m r_ W m W` �r CD J E 1 u O L 0. W U c o coi •`� a`� a m a Roo ca -o � �, c o m E v o a Q CIO o � U -c Co Q, `� -oC �b4 N o O, CZ o� � Q � E a`oi 4 m c- a� 0 .W 0 n to m� W� mo 0� I It m „a m 3e dwk. roc 0 FFFiii , g 9¢. Ca LU i 5 ca Q C E° O 0 c S sm C. bm O L O L .5_ ui i U))wn` `© W�� ; 1 1►` Zw U. > a) m CO O CM > ,� OCU> m U c m 3 C O; E °3 E E m-0 c u a a) mLV) V) m n c a) m O Q - a Ln E o O NO — OQ E E w°) o n a) E �.� a) O o a) cno w Na m ELn c a) UO d- W c a) E- U > V) �' m (n � ) tv o > + C a) E O C _0 °) Vi n U) a) a) > E m U a) U U +. U T +� U- O C .0 i C 0A aj O o' Q m m 'O V) O- O= n U C O m U a0 <n •C Mm o E c m iv n a) c c a) > c c° c w a O�-0 a) a) on0 U �° c c a� o ccv aa) ao >�cu L L 04 N U U U Z- C •> N V)) L — U W U E m E , W a) a) E c a) U 'tw an +O m y W o 0 O L + c > U O c m U a) CD- C LL-U _ C O U C � N O fl_ ub m a)• p c0 m E w a) "a >, C a) m a) L- o n 0 O a) n -O 0 Q m. � m C a) a _; U E ca C a) N + '3 n ca C a) L -O .> a--� m z W O c m a) U Q bA c m L m 0 c O m .E "p a) L O N i Q) U a) o n O E a) L E m N a) > Zt C c C O c m E U m m +� cn a i > m a) +-' a) a0 a) '- V) V)V) U n a) O U E Uw0 O W E O L) +m dUa o -o-O cu 'o CU o L O do E u LO O n ' E W 0 C U N Q a) OC O L } 3 u O V) V) a) O n a) a) � N a) +� m a) a) a) O E m i Q U in U ¢ 3 ~ n aa)) N an a) UU LO C c u`� 3 a) � p O U P C ao E eo m c M c E Q) E a) n N m- O cv c c p o T .0 f _ c a) U E c 0 00 an a) i E Q o L O o n c 0 (n -O �p O a) _0 o p M C O °° a o Z LC �-. C C> C O O T y rn +, m c m o U T c, o 0 00 +� -0 a) ^ E O c a) +� L o N -O Lo �+ -O OO — -O cv o 0 0 a� coo a) D CD a) m c E 3= Eo Z7� p m ti U f io _ _ c m C O -� wE d C is C a) m ++ 3 Y a) c m a O a) c N o O +, a) a--� c m ?i coo a) — o a) w U)' a) E L c o f 3 -a a) �, a .0 C O_ O c N m U + my o rn o Z� E E N .O O C cU0 n o >, cn "c O n E '6 m E U -O Y= � fV N C_ n 0-ai 0 •c E m O U m d Y O L E E N C O E o 3 .2 d O QJ c� a O }' E m -p n c6 U C fQ V) + E o o eo C C C X U V (n O bA N L O C — r E O U o` _ 0 a) E C N U y U a) c- CL n O C C (a U� O N o N N. V O c - o d m O a) U — V N r OJ U E O _T 0 d O O 00 O M CD E V L c a) O '�' O vn a) E d n `� -° o OC - o O E E > m a) U N O - M Z E pd n E - 7 E E O U O E 0 Q1 O _m O o _� o aJ a� C U -o m a) F— n a- a- O E _N W IZI- U-) Lo 00 O O O C O O O N N N N co cz N a) OA @ c =3 G C o z L) to oa C c E -o a) o y wV Q Y LLL) +N.. co a m Y m L�l Lu S3 E ' -G G� c ° o o `o, o w' a, m .;g a g a cz N -= O UU GU.i ,Rp -U -c'") � a a a ?) cco ZZ O N o m o � a a � o 3 3 0 a LV � a cc Ro O L >r p O 0 O o -W� ° � C V C 00' O N o 0 G• 0 O N Qci rn Q 22 USN�C Q�cnm C) w 4 1 m CD = N. m O �' o m m O N \I� w 2 • x X 0) tv 7 Q (D tv O O 70 0 (14 I • CD CD < CDrt C') p n cn O Nr CD Q (n r CD — O rr S CID rn O W O O Q N CD- Cv v 77 = 0 C to Q • CT v O co r�r O * (D Cn COD (D Z7 0') CD (D O o C1 Cv =- C1 =3 0 (n O- =3 p Cn (D • ou 0-o W =; ID Q CD < 0 ,, p p O (D CD O O � �7Cn 3 CD (Jl Q) N N O 0 N � Val O O ' d 2 � v � aS + + m o 3 ET ti o n sy 4 0 0 c Q vc o Z3 a Q a y o z n a F3 o m CC, Cb d � � ^�+� :!� c� > > 4 ou • • • Con Cv —{ O r-r 7 'O —i c~ D - D o n: No Q o o V) c coo C1 � OG 1 O_ O CD 5' r-r ~ — N rr O *_ CD- a CD Vr o UQ 3 � 3 � F — OO r�-r O O �_ C./) r-r Z7 Cn O O O (D cn � (n v .� CD CD _ CD O N Cv p CD rr p O .Z7 CD ,--r _ 7 tv O 3 O rr (D O_ O a �'' r-r CD 00 7 U) C) O -i •G 00 r�-r ~(D (DCD r0-r O CS v (D u (.Tl CD C CAD 'O n CD v C1 O CD CD Q cn (DD O N c a a)( 77 0 - - CD 0- 3 N p_ C CD- CD_ O 0 Q -Cnp `< n r-r CD nO a) — (D (D — p N' p' O 3 r r = 3 (D 0 0 (D � p' (<D ( O � O = CJ1 O C1 p �� T` v 0- (D N 7, CND � _ 9 O =3 (Z = (D I 1I1 �© 2I1 5Ic 4 'AII ...0 T N I dJ eJ q� N a m n m -. - (-�_ c Ni m m� rrl �� O �� N O. O a O c7 cn C, ti d H mrz O O N n O n ti m n Q _ ZL O y O O� W c�D 'O`M ,O QQ O O `� O O cnD d' m Z a `� m ? co c a� a m m' y. : `° n m °« Co c?cCl) a cCb j n Cb 0= Q Z3m C cb n O o 4 n m m a � m `D' a aC, o o CCb - cc a m o' � 3 0 o- m C5 n� °p, o n ti c� o c o �' m m o c z- m m n, c� w o Zl m oe ` = c m m o r- � m cn o " Cb �yO Cb c �ca= n m m m 1 y Z ap . rTl-.. m m O ^ W rn 0 C) (I m o> n a m m yn 0 O O O Cr) O co (R 0 mn O (I O o' o �v zz ;E m S� m Cb QL)1 z a Z3- o CL ti m a = m � 'oo n -T, C)7 -0 r . t3 M C 7 (n W c — n (1 cn < sv O C) D CD p Q D `. � CT O O (D 0 �- (° O n C '6 n O CO') 4. (<D Q O n _° 0 < (D' Q lD O < 0O rr Z �< r-r O C Q C tv O O < (D 0 c = tv n rnr N� (DO N n O (D v ((D W(D p O O CD o- (D p o O (D (� LD O O CD �' - (D c rr O iv r . (> ffl p 0q D 0 (ra4 O o O c> V a N (n (D 3 O C1 T CD ,-r p p O O 0 ~ C) c (D C7 C� (n O n (D O cz v 0 ul < = O — CD =' O < N N co N :.17 ' 3 � Q v = (n O —_ (31 (D sv — O N (n (D v N (n Cv r.r Q = (n r�r UQ CD CD r-r (D p' rr j < C -O tv r-r O �7 O m O = CDO CND N O � v CD fll' Ln CAD ai Q Q 0- O O N CN.> (D CCDD C CD- COD C1�Q — Q OCD-' .. O CD r�-r ,--r CT (D Q. — (D a)r-r v O n O. (n O N :3 r0-r CD p (D d r-r — VCDi ,Cn-r CAD � (D CD < -0 - r-r O fy r-r (n p C<D � = d < O , CAD n O CAD O 00 (JI � R O O Q F-) O (n v n Q) O 0 — O ccD � E, (D (D v << v a) (D I (D 1 Q c n 0 � Cb O ? 1 n _ N O = O to m � m C o n o c:, m m ::3 H d ? 1 co m m o Czz ? H m y O cc aq p ``Oc O O cCSD cnD — d d Cep m O V1 CD m 0 ■ m n rf Bellevue Nickel Improvement Project Today's open house meeting is an opportunity to provide input into what will be studied during the environmental review for the Bellevue Nickel Project. Before construction can begin, project level analysis is required to confirm all potential natural and built environmental impacts within the project limits —from SE 8th Street to 1-90 along 1-405. Please provide your comments in the areas below and leave this form with a staff person or at the welcome station where you signed in. You may also mail the form as long as we receive it by February 10, 2005. 1. What aspects of the environment do you think should be studied and why? 2. Please describe any concerns you may have about potential environmental impacts. 1-405 Bellevue Nickel - Project • Build one new northbound lane 3. What measures should WSDOT consider to reduce potential impacts? between 1-90 and SE 8th Street • Build one new southbound lane between NE 4th Street and 1-90 and reconstruct of the Wilburton Tunnel • Widen northbound bridge over BNSF railroad and southbound bridge over SE 8th Street • Extend existing southbound lane exiting at 1-90 to begin in the SE 8th vicinity Please provide your ... .............. ... comments on this project ............................ ......... ................................................ ............ ... . (over) by February 10, 2005 AMk —Department Washington State Mr of Transportation 4. Do you have any other comments about the proposed project? fold here -tape closed before sending place stamp here to mail Paul Krueger Bellevue Nickel Improvement Project WSDOT 600 - 108th Avenue NE, Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004-9800 fold here —tape closed before sending For additional questions or comments, contact: Paul Krueger kruegep@wsdot.wa.gov 425-456-8500 www wsdot. wa.gov/projects/1-405 To be added to our mailing list or for a formal WSDOT response, provide your contact information: Address Phone and/or email Renton Nickel Improvement Project 1-405 Renton Nickel Project • Build one new northbound lane from SR181toSR167 • Build one new southbound lane from SR 169 to SR 167 and from SR 181 to 1-5 • Extend SR 167 southbound HOV lane approximately a half mile north from its current beginning • Add an auxiliary lane on SR 167 between 1-405 and the 41 st Street off - ramp Please provide your comments on this project by February 10, 2005 Today's open house meeting is an opportunity to provide input into what will be studied during the environmental review for the Renton Nickel Project. Before construction can begin, project level analysis is required to confirm all potential natural and built environmental impacts within the project limits-1-405 from 1-5 in Tukwila to SR 169 in Renton, and along SR 167 south from 1-405 to SW 41 st Street. Please provide your comments in the areas below and leave this form with a staff person or at the welcome station where you signed in. You may also mail the form as long as we receive it by February 10, 2005. 1. What aspects of the environment do you think should be studied and why? 2. Please describe any concerns you may have about potential environmental impacts. 3. What measures should WSDOT consider to reduce potential impacts? (over) Admk WWashington State Department of Transportation 4. Do you have any other comments about the proposed project? fold here -tape closed before sending place stamp here to mail Allison Ray Renton Nickel Improvement Project WSDOT 600 - 108th Avenue NE, Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004-9800 ------------------------------------------------ fold here —tape closed before sending —_.—_ For additional questions or comments, contact: Allison Ray rayaili@wsdot.wa.gov 425-456-8500 www. wsdot. wa.gov/projects/1-405 To be added to our mailing list or for a formal WSDOT response, provide your contact information: Address Phone and/or email 518 SR 518 Sea-Tac Airport to 1-5 Project Today's open house meeting is an opportunit09 y to provide input into what will be studied during the environmental review for the SR 518 Sea-Tac Airport to 1-5 Project. Before construction can begin, project level analysis v is required to confirm all potential natural and built environmental impacts within the project limits —from North Airport Expressway Interchange to 1-5/ 1-405 Interchange Vicinity. Please provide your comments in the areas below and leave this form with a staff person or at the welcome station where you signed in. You may also mail the form as long as we receive it by February 10, 2005. RENTON SR 518 Sea-Tac Airport to 1-5 Project This project will improve existing mobility and safety and accommodate projected airport traffic by adding a third eastbound lane between the North Airport Expressway and the 1-5/1-405 interchange. Please provide your comments on this project by February 10, 2005 1. What aspects of the environment do you think should be studied and why? 2. Please describe any concerns you may have about potential environmental impacts. 3. What measures should WSDOT consider to reduce potential impacts? (over) Afth WWashington State Department of Transportation 518 4. Do you have any other comments about the proposed project? fold here —tape closed before sending w place stamp here to mail David T. Williams SR 518 Projects WSDOT 6431 Corson Avenue S Seattle, WA 98108-3445 --w-------------- --_.- fold here —tape closed before sending ----_.— --_.-- For additional questions or comments, contact: David r Williams willidt@wsdot.wa.gov 206-464-1235 www. wsdot. wa.gov/projects/SR518 To be added to our mailing list or for a formal WSDOT response, provide your contact information: Name Address Phone and/or email 518 SR 509/SR 518 Interchange Project 99 i t" BELLEVUE` ':�-WASNtKGNN ,, 99 a i a a BURIEN REN70N xs� 181 167 SR 509/SR 518 Interchange Project This project will evaluate a SR 509 southbound to SR 518 eastbound freeway -to -freeway connection. This connection will address existing access and safety problems and provide for anticipated corridor growth. Please provide your comments on this project by February 10, 2005 Today's open house meeting is an opportunity to provide input into what will be studied during the environmental review for the SR 509/SR 518 Interchange Project. Before construction can begin, project level analysis is required to confirm all potential natural and built environmental impacts within the project limits —in the vicinity of the SR 509/SR 518 Interchange in Burien. Please provide your comments in the areas below and leave this form with a staff person or at the welcome station where you signed in. You may also mail the form as long as we receive it by February 10, 2005. 1. What aspects of the environment do you think should be studied and why? 2. Please describe any concerns you may have about potential environmental impacts. 3. What measures should WSDOT consider to reduce potential impacts? (over)Adw I Washington State w, Department of Transportation 518 4. Do you have any other comments about the proposed project? fold here -tape closed before sending place stamp here to mail David T. Williams SR 518 Projects WSDOT 6431 Corson Avenue S Seattle, WA 98108-3445 Foldhere—tape closed before sending For additional questions or comments, contact: David T. Williams wiiiidt@wsdot.wa.gov 206-464-1235 www wsdot. wa.gov/projects/SR518 A] To be added to our mailing list or for a formal WSDOT response, provide your contact information: Address Phone and/or email -- - Ronald Straka - Fwd: REMINDER: 1/25/05: 1-405 Renton/Bellevue Agency Scoping Meeting Page 2 Scoping Meeting for the Bellevue Nickel Project [SE 8th to 1-90] and Renton Nickel Project [West Valley Highway to Maple Valley Highway] environmental documents. The meeting will be held at the City of Newcastle's Community Room from 9 am - 12:30 pm. A meeting agenda and map will follow in a mailing to you. What are the objectives for this meeting? 1. Learn about the 1-405 Bellevue and Renton Nickel Projects 2. Provide input into what gets studied in the environmental assessments for the Bellevue and South Renton projects 3. Meet each other and hear concerns of other agencies Why a combined approach? To make better use of your time and facilitate less travel time, members of the 1-405 Project Team felt that we could easily combine Agency Scoping Meetings for these two 1-405 projects. Originally, two meetings were to be scheduled to coincide with the dates for the public scoping meetings (please see attached invitation/flyer). This combined scoping meeting will be from 9 am - 12:30 pm. In addition to resource agencies and neighboring local agencies, we felt that it would be beneficial to invite staff from both Bellevue and Renton to hear both project descriptions and issues since the two projects are so close geographically on 1-405. There will definitely be parts of the meeting agenda where we'll need to focus on just one project (project desc, issue identification, potential impacts), but there are some subjects that cover both projects (Nickel overview, corridor ROD, Purpose & Need, design -build, and possibly some of the NEPA/Permitting issues). Who should attend? Please coordinate with the transportation, public works, natural resources, historic or cultural resources, fire, police, aviation and other relevant departments within your agency to determine the appropriate participation from your agency at this meeting. If you received this message and you no longer work on 1-405 Corridor Projects, please let us know so we can take your name off the distribution list and/or replace it with the appropriate person. Where will the meeting be held? We decided to go with a location that would be somewhere between (% u h 17 ry -- rr 4 --<A �-) - �c11,1 yf�>?g Ronald Straka - Fwd: REMINDER: 1/25/0' 1-405 Renton/Bellevue Agency Scoping Meeting Page 3 Bellevue and Renton, and easily accessible from 1-405 (directions will follow). The meeting will be held at: City of Newcastle Community Room 9:00am-12:30pm 13020 Newcastle Way Newcastle, WA 98059 425.649.4444 Who should I send my RSVP to? Please reply to Eric Wolin at wolined(cDwsdot.wa.gov to confirm your attendance. If you are unable to attend, please let us know who from your agency will be attending. Also if by chance, there is a major schedule conflict, please let us know right away. If you have any questions about the Agency Scoping Meeting, please feel free to call one of the following individuals: Paul Krueger, 1-405 Bellevue Nickel Project Environmental Manager kruegep(cDwsdot.wa.gov; 425-456-8500) Allison Ray, 1-405 Renton Nickel Project Environmental Manager rayalli(cwsdot.wa.gov; 425-456-8500) Colleen Gants, 1-405 Public Information ( colleen.gantsCu)i405.wsdot.wa.gov; 425-456-8555) This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. (See attached file: Public Scoping Meeting Flyer Final.pdo CC: Alexander Pietsch; Gregg Zimmerman b rc li c S G1. m m d 4'� ` a 'Q 2 ? .o .m a N C Q N t G �.N �� ¢ Lo 1� p 3ma 5=zE vQ 0 co co y Z m v y a{ a v c N> S!0 m ? rn a an d O N vi U o }I a amigice- cSEomE 0 8 w + n 5 a •- c m N , WA 3 E m c °c °o d0_'.c ��(n CL mW �m of r°�y O H L T O a a 5cn~75 > WW m tt t O _ i .Eccca mac.-mm'o a '1 c u c m c -S c^ov a a 8 N m o a a c E m u 4 n• W m »o c O m-c c y _'vm-�no o S �.. u tq c Cb mZ v v. Y v`o m Y NY -;ion mE U c v 2m;�eS VE�o��m �Y = H ate¢ m >mr v omN Ec J. ,� � y � m� � N C R C N C 0 O O Q 7 fp t N N O N 8 m1L-v o 8•L s s $Ef - s g m g q ®��� H �$������ 3 t� m G 0 m a JS c C n a m e y C c N m Q y V m o= j.,8 A go z a E d E p0p C r E G G ca �a 2 OL-,o S•%E e 2 w� a :51. 8IC H E N C po 10 a «Emc O� s c $mo V .o m�10 o :�$Y ��2 ai ;EyE ` CE � a.o£ rA O E ate ->I H�.a wEac ,v°Oae E-°�am �/ In CL e"8- 0 Q E WNQ �N � nH w P°o m SN En rIIII — (QN'J y�� pWJW�Z NFaN ---- ZW- w w N = 0 0 o w o) y g 0 w a (1) Ly - w (9 ¢� - _W Z��� —_ O _ S ccCo I I I .y+ IA � N U W N N N O2 V V d t 5 Z o a.aU)Nm E mccTi$$om £ a" o� 5 2 0 S no v o O 'D o 0O m L C aN ad > C .E �� a m 3 m -E m in w '� O o O Y d m coi y C o c o oU) E� �¢ m a E P alb E o 0, °' c q T'O L o CO c w W U N O; O I o_ O lU to a ~ N EK dE ' m o� 'ro�> oyobw mm .nm TamNm hm'IIII toC, ad ° ya= c 0.cs�mm(AC oaa o n N d o o a cOO :2 • Ym� E O Co o 5 N E T c qF O OoL>1¢d�ct� >E°Sod� �I o� 3N O V U �'O O V � Y Y C O a C 1] �o s__ ` 0 W r N .LO.. C F' N N OI U N L 3 O 2 C t t Y y lo U 0 5 c « 7 d y c a m sa° o y 0 N N m U T o t.. N d D 6 •C i0 z 0 N Y 2 d G W =� O d r d 6 x �� d Orr m 2 O O0'wo Q� �F-3a cm °? -W S�:m?gv�m N a a C m m Og tiD E m 81 Co O' 0 m -' � Z C O O O cQ) 42 12, N CD advZo NoS Nxd<D <D tzQS i C mm�a y coo)n CD m ova ao'o a r=�" Nm w rZ mL u m `m 4. m m a O za� 0¢ N j So€oo� d2 �oN �E E�=a'- C- t 5 -9 NNE V _a o E Z, age' a� vi o a� o ;$ B �$a �g $� E $ N� F g j� m Ea m�� Lol �od.8� • B� c o ma O3tn 30 - Go a 3 o� m N m m m 5� O1 = „�°, C c. m' 9 �; a0 u T v3 3 o y o o N m Y. „N 5 Qa as oo.o m� ` co NOv�i 03 ` E£ 3am `i. �. u. u)d 12 au o � 'O s 0 c y 2- V� U a eop m bra �3 ,o a NN O O C Oo m N 3 a. C m v> m �O N U U ghni `. yU N z A£'... -No Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects January 25, 2005 4:00 pm — 7:00 pm The Bradford Center What is the purpose of today's meeting, and how can I get involved? Tonight's goals' Thank you for attending today's Open House & Scoping Meeting regarding the WSDOT and FHWA proposal to improve the 1-405 corridor; specifically the 1. Inform you about the project, Bellevue Nickel Improvement Project. The information in this packet, along with information presented in the displays and by project staff, is intended to schedule, and the environmental assist you as an active participant. process Your involvement throughout this project is important. It ensures that problems 2. Present designs for the project and concerns regarding alternatives and foreseeable enivronmental impacts that have been developed to date, are identified early and incorporated into both the environmental and design and ask what design refinements process. You can stay informed by checking out the project website you feel should be considered (www.wsdot.wa.gov/projects/I-405), attending future public meetings, and signing up for our mailing and email lists. 3. Present environmental issues identified to date and ask what If significant environmental impacts not addressed during the previous 1-405 additional environmental issues Corridor Program Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) are discovered during data gathering, engineering design, or impacts analysis, an additional EIS may you feel should be studied be prepared specifically for the 1-405 Bellevue Nickel Improvement Project. 99 If this happens, no additional scoping meetings will be held. However, a Notice of Intent, published in the Federal and SEPA Registers, would expressly provide that written comments on the scope of the alternatives, the potential impacts, and the identification of resources would be collected and considered. .. BELLEVUE RENTON Who may I contact with comments or for more information? All written comments received by February 10, 2005 will be included in the formal scoping record and will be considered by the 1-405 Program administrators. Please contact: Paul Krueger or 1-405 Project Team 600 — 108th Ave. NE, Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004 (425) 456-8500 Colleen Gants Public Information 1-405 Project Team 600 — 108th Ave. NE, Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004 (425) 456-8500 Adolk GWashington State , Department of Transportation Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects 1-405 Corridor Program: Purpose and Need The following statement guided the development of the Selected Alternative for the 1-405 Corridor Program: The need is to improve personal and freight mobility and reduce foreseeable traffic congestion in the corridor that encompasses the 1-405 study area from Tukwila to Lynnwood in a manner that is safe, reliable and cost-effective. The purpose of the proposed action is to provide an efficient, integrated, and multi -modal system of transportation solutions within the corridor that meets the project need in a manner that: • Provides for maintenance or enhancement of livability for communities within the corridor • Provides for maintenance or improvement of air quality, protection or enhancement of fish -bearing streams, and regional environmental values such as continued integrity of the natural environment • Supports a vigorous state and regional economy by responding to existing and future travel needs • Accommodates planned regional growth What are the plans for the Bellevue Nickel Improvement Project? The Bellevue Nickel Improvement Project limits extend from SE 8th Street to 1-90 along 1-405. The project will add one northbound lane between 1-90 and SE 8th Street, one southbound lane between Main Street and 1-90 and includes the reconstruction of the Wilburton Tunnel. The northbound bridge over the BNSF railroad and the southbound bridge over SE 8th Street will be widened. The 1-405 environmental team is assessing the Bellevue Nickel Improvement Project's environmental impacts, as well as other nearby projects identified in the 1-405 Corridor Master Plan. The Master Plan is the long-range mobility strategy for congestion relief for the entire corridor, and was advanced through the 1-405 Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Record of Decision in October 2002. What are the specific proposed Nickel Improvement Project elements in Bellevue? • One new northbound lane between 1-90 and SE 8th Street • One new southbound lane between NE 4th Street and 1-90, reconstruction of the Wilburton Tunnel • Widening northbound bridge over BNSF railroad and southbound bridge over SE 8th Street What has the environmental process been for this project? The 1-405 Corridor Program Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) provided a corridor -wide environmental review and Record of Decision (ROD) for improvements to 1-405 between 1-5 in Tukwila and 1-5 in Lynnwood. The ROD was issued in October 2002. The Selected Alternative identified in the ROD provides for widening 1-405 by up to two lanes in each direction throughout its 30-mile length. The freeway design includes a buffer separating the general-purpose lanes and the HOV lane, and it provides for implementation of a bus rapid transit system operating in the improved HOV lanes. The proposed action would provide an efficient, integrated, and multi -modal system of transportation solutions to improve the movement of people and goods, reduce foreseeable traffic congestion, and enhance mobility in the project area, which extends from the 1-405/SR 520 interchange in the south to the 1-405/SR 522 interchange to the north. The 1-405 Corridor Program EIS and ROD provided that project improvements contained within the Selected Alternative would be re-examined individually or in combination for phased implementation. The Bellevue Nickel Improvement Project is one of several projects being advanced as part of a phased implementation of the Selected Alternative. In keeping with the direction established in the EIS and ROD, the Bellevue Nickel Improvement Project is proposed for evaluation within the National Environmentla Policy Act document that focuses on the project -level effects of the proposed improvements. The description and analysis of the project will be based on a "preliminary footprint" level of design. The Bellevue Nickel Improvement environmental assessment will address the potential effects to the natural and built environments within the study area, which generally encompass the lands extending approximately one mile on either side of 1-405 within the project limits. What key environmental issues are being studied in the Environmental Assessment? As identified in the 1-405 Corridor Program Environmental Assessment, important environmental elements concerning the 1-405 Bellevue Nickel Improvement Project include: • Re -alignment of southbound mainline to the east will involve substantial cuts and fills and require large retaining walls to stabilize steep slope (erosion hazard) areas • Traffic will experience temporary construction impacts (detours and lane closures; increase in local street traffic) • Runoff to local drainage systems and streams will likely increase • Realignment of southbound mainline will require relocation of unnamed stream in 1-405 median • Wetlands, particularly within the SE 8th Street interchange vicinity, will be filled/reduced • Bald Eagle Habitat identified west of project area within Mercer Slough system Cont. on pg. 4 WWashington State Department of Transportation Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects Con t. from pg. 3 • Potential visual and noise impacts during construction within SE 8th Street vicinity • Views will be altered looking east from downtown Bellevue • King County Metro sewer trunk line runs north -south within 1-405 right-of-way Studies are underway to identify and evaluate potential environmental effects of the Bellevue Nickel Improvement Project. The scope of these studies will be based on research conducted during the previous 1-405 Corridor Program EIS, from information received from resource and regulatory agencies, and from comments and concerns identified during public and agency scoping. Individuals requiring reasonable accommodation may request written materials in alternate formats, sign language interpreters, physical accessibility accommodations, or other reasonable accommodation by contacting Ben Brown at WSDOT, 206-440-4528, usually two weeks before the meeting date. Persons who are deaf or hard -of -hearing may call Washington State Telecommunications Relay Service (TTY) at 711, Tele-Braille at 1-800-833-6385, Voice at 1-800-833-6384, or Spanish TTY at 1-800-833-6399 and ask to be connected to the event sponsor's phone number. Title VI Notice to Public: WSDOT assures full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by prohibiting discrimination based on race, color, national origin and sex in the provision of benefits and services. For information on Department's Title VI Program, please contact the Title VI Coordinator at 360-705-7098. MWashington state AP Department of Transportation US DepaNnent of Transportation % ,,M mate® % Administration AGENCY City of Newcastle, Community Room 13020 Newcastle Way Newcastle, WA 98059 Tuesday, January 25, 2004, 9:00 am to 12:30 pm MEETING OBJECTIVES 1. Learn about the I-405 Renton Nickel and Bellevue Nickel Projects. 2. Provide input into what gets studied in the environmental assessments for the Bellevue and Renton Nickel projects. 3. Meet each other and hear concerns of other agencies with jurisdiction. MEETING AGENDA 8:45 Sign -in • Review handouts • Review presentation boards 9:00 Welcome • Introductions/Meeting Objectives • Overview of "Nickel" Projects • Design -Build • Corridor ROD to individual project • Purpose and Need 9:30 Bellevue Nickel Project Description • Proposed project improvements • Impacts — avoided/minimized and unavoidable Bellevue Nickel Project Issue Identification 10:30 Break 10:45 Renton Nickel Project Description • Proposed project improvements • Impacts — avoided/minimized and unavoidable Renton Nickel Project Issue Identification 12:00 NEPA & Permitting • Discipline reports to be prepared & NEPA schedule • Early Environmental Investments • Permitting approach and schedule 12:30 Adjourn All Allison Ray/Paul Krueger Denise Cieri/Stacy Trussler Christina Martinez Ron Ohlsen All Ross Fenton Paul Krueger/Allison Ray Sharon Wright Tracey McKenzie All RECEIVED Q P71 0 6 2004 CITY OF RENTON CITY OFRENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORI,&glITYSYS-1EMS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 31, 2004 TO: file FROM: Keith Woolley SUBJECT: I-405 City Design Team Members I-405 Administrators I-405 Ci Design Team Members Transportation Afzali, Nick Hamilton, Karl Jones, Nathan Lahndt, Leslie Lochmiller, Robert Mahn, Bob Meyer, Sandra Woolley, Keith Utilities Christensen, David Gafour, Abdoul Hornsby, Lys Straka, Ronald kRI` �j�s4 L I-405 Administrators Maintenance Michael Stenhouse Development Services Kayren Kittrick Jennifer Henning Community Services Betlach, Leslie Flatley, Terrence Renner Peter Mayor — Jay Covington PBPW - Gregg Zimmerman (Crystal McMeans, Judy Walter) Comm Svcs - Dennis Culp (Sandra Pilat) Econ Dev - Alex Pietsch (Debra Mikolaizik) Fire - Lee Wheeler cc: EDNSP Lind, Rebecca Mulhall, Shawna Wolters, Ben Fire Engler, Stan Gray, James Police Eldridge, Floyd H:\File Sys\TRP - Transportation Planning & Program ming\TRP-10 - Transportation Planning Projects\WSDOT 1405\meeting notes & agendas\CDT Members.doc\krw CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 31, 2004 TO: I-405 City Design Team FROM: Nick Afzali, Transportation Planning SUBJECT: S 15`h Street at Talbot Road S As part of the proposed 1-405 improvements, W SDOT has requested feedback from the City with regards to the intersection of S 151h Street / Talbot Rd S / Benson Dr S / Puget Drive (whew!). (S 15 St to the west; Talbot Rd S to the north; Benson Dr S to the south; Puget Drive to the east) All 17-1 s - - .o ,x d One option presented by WSDOT is to bring northbound I405 ramps into the west leg of this intersection, in place of the existing S 15`h Street leg. S. 15`h Street would be closed at this location except for emergency vehicle access. I Vehicular access to this area of Talbot Hill would then be to/from the south via the intersection of Talbot Rd S / S 21 s` Street and the intersection of Talbot Rd S / S 23 St / Shattuck Ave S. Access to Benson Dr S (SR 515) would be at the S 2 1 " Street signal. Please provide in writing, to myself or Keith Woolley, any comments, perspectives, concerns, issues, etc. that you and your department may have with respect to the described option for this intersection — specifically the closure of S 15`h Street. Please provide your comments (or let us know that you have no comments) by April 19th. Thank you. Please keep in mind this is only one of a number of proposed options, but we have been requested to provide feedback to W SDOT. cc: File Q:\PRINT\out\CDT Memo re S 15th St.doc\d 0 I-405 Coordination City Design Team Meeting Meeting Agenda Conference Room 511 April 14, 2004 1:30-3:00 PM '• Environmental Task Force - Early Environmental Investment (EEI) - South Renton update i- EEI meeting May 51h for North Renton to Bothell - discuss attendance y-/z PAJ �,* ,-v, Emergency Response Task Force (first Wednesday of each month) f Traffic Analysis Task Force (third Wednesday of each month) - Traffic Modeling / Intersection Analysis `4 Pumps/Parks Task Force (last Thursday of each month) - eo ,4 PI ,�+cc fiyt G��`� i ✓!Li �i�l'� �, �.csi �:.1c,ei( fi- `j _ luS�liT $ �Pa..� • Boeing/ Economic Development Task Force (second Tuesday of each month) - Comments on South Renton mainline and Talbot interchange options • Draft Memorandum of Understanding • Report from Administrators/Executives Meeting (bi-monthly meeting) - WSDOT Work Plan (schedule) • Utilities - Sunset Sewer Interceptor project brief C'[ly • Nickel Package Designti'"� - Benson Road Overpass Replacement N. 8th St. HOV Sound Transit graphics 7-b h.e. hv/ • Citizen Involvement / Public Outreach Process - North Renton neighborhood meeting on April 22 - Renton Hill individual meetings • Next Meetings / Potential Topics - SR 167 / E Valley Rd interchange - City Maintenance Facility March 8, 2004 I-405 Project Office Attn: Stacy C. Trussler P.E., M.S 600 108th Ave. NE Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004 RECEIVED MAR 0 9 2004 URBAN CORRIDORS OFFICE RE: I-405 Improvements at Renton Hill Dear Ms. Trussler, It was nice to meet with you and Colleen Gants on Thursday, February 26th at the home of Ruthie Larson. We got acquainted and reviewed some of the ideas for the freeway design and access to Renton Hill. We're sure we all would like this project to get started on the right foot and conclude as a success for the Washington State Department of Transportation, the City of Renton, and Renton Hill residents. We would like to reiterate some of the issues we discussed on Thursday. First: The idea of trust. When the WS-DOT straightened portions of the Renton S- curves, oral and written promises were made that were later completely ignored or substantially altered. The operative mode came across to us as "Tell them anything to shut them up but we'll do what we want, when we want, and how we want." The overpasses came out fairly Ok, but only because Hill residents had to constantly remind the DOT of details that kept getting overlooked. We would like accountability built into the promises and agreements. We recognize things change during lengthy construction projects, but the DOT must work hard to avoid unilateral decisions that reverse previous understandings and negatively impact Renton Hill and City of Renton residents. Second: Understanding the need to minimize the impact on the people living here. Condemning people's property and tearing down their homes is extremely stressful. Previously we saw what we felt was undue callousness and simply blowing off people's concerns. When handied with care, people can move when the time is best for them, the State and residents work together to keep the houses livable while inhabited, the neighborhood transitions without a period of severe deterioration/vandalism, and the remaining residents see some overall neighborhood improvement. We prefer it this way. Third: Appreciating the fact that Renton Hill is somewhat of an isolated area. We will shortly be about 350 homes accessed mostly y steep, narrow one -lane streets, with grades often 11 %-26%. Busses cannot service the hill. On some streets, the houses are within a few feet of the sidewalk. Many intersections on the top of the Hill have no traffic signage, such as Stop or Yield. Some people point to the City of Seattle pipeline "road" as a possible access point, but that's not a realistic choice for several reasons: The pipes buried there carry a high percentage of the water used in Seattle. Understandably, the City of Seattle is very protective of that pipeline. The road covering the pipeline is not built or maintained to minimum street standards, and the allowable vehicle weights may severely limit what can be driven on it. The City of Seattle currently does not allow or want it used for regular traffic and they are not likely to change their deep-rooted decision for anybody for any reason anytime soon. Many years ago through traffic was allowed on the pipeline road to provide one more access point. Instead of Hill residents using it, residents southeast of the Hill in an area of about 3,000 homes began using it as a shortcut to town and the freeway. The increased traffic and crime totally overwhelmed Hill residents. Traffic at the foot of the Hill blocked the streets and intersections until even emergency vehicles couldn't through. Today we laugh at the thought of sending cars down active railroad tracks but for a short section, the railroad ties were paved over and pressed into service as a street. Cars and trucks drove down the rails to try to help get traffic moving again. It was a wasted effort. Opening the pipeline road was an absolute disaster for the Hill and City of Renton, which ended it with the road being blocked with a locked gate. It's safe to say neither Hill residents nor the City would look forward to doing this noble experiment again. Therefore we encourage you to limit the final proposed access designs to Mill Street. (The street paralleling I-405 is technically Mill Street for a few blocks then the name inexplicably changes to 3rd for the distance between the overpasses. Herein we're referring to the street simply as Mill Street because it's one continuous street). Your current master design shows several proposed access points: two (B & C) to the North and two (A & D) that are, or could be, to the south of Mill Street. The other three, E, F, and G, should be shown as considered but discarded designs. Fourth: Not leaving us with less access than we have now. Renton Hill is currently served by two overpasses. From casual observation, both seem to carry about the same amount of traffic. Both connect to different narrow one -lane streets on the Hill, which helps balance the traffic coming up and leaving the Hill. The two overpasses also afford us a level of protection against the hundred ways Man and Nature conspire to put an overpass out of commission. We are counting on reviewing design proposals that maintain two access points from Mill street to City of Renton surface streets. Thank you and we look -forward to working with you. 'y Rueelar4sonj President, Renton Hill Community and Neighborhood Association Phone: 25) 255- 290 E-Mail: randwlarson@msn.com Dan Hemenway Chairman, Renton Hill Neighborhood Association Phone: (425) 271-2969 E-Mail: danhemenway@comcast.net Keith Woolley - Talbot Interchange Options - EDNSP Review Page 1 From: Shawna Mulhall To: Afzali, Nick Date: 4/5/2004 4:48:18 PM Subject: Talbot Interchange Options - EDNSP Review EDNSP has reviewed the Talbot interchange options and has the following comments. 1. Our overriding goal is to support an effective, achievable interchange design. 2. We appreciate the opportunity to review the interchanges at this preliminary stage, and we look forward to seeing further analysis. Additional analysis may cause us to refine our opinions. 3. All of our comments focus on the north side of 1-405. We do not have enough information to comment on the various design options for the south side of the 1-405/Talbot interchange. 4. Based on these preliminary drawings, or, more accurately, ideas, Options D and H seem to provide the most potential economic benefit because they improve land access. However, because cut-thru traffic from Grady through the shopping center is inevitable and we feel the only safe solution would include mitigation for this by creating a local street connection from Grady to the new 1-405 connection. 5. If further analysis shows that Options D and H do not operate effectively or have other fatal flaws, Options F or G are our second choice because they have the least land use impact. Of these two, we're told that the squiggle in Option G results in a narrower 1-405, which we would support if that is the only significant difference between them. The collector -distributor by-pass roads may benefit traffic flow, but we have concerns about the weave from the freeway to the bypass roads. The drawings do not show the weave from the bypass roads to the interchange exits (particularly to Lind from 1-405 southbound), and we are concerned that we may be re-creating the weaving movement we just eliminated at the existing 1-405 interchange. We need more information and expanded drawings to weigh in on this issue. 6. Options A and B are our third ranked grouping. These do not have the land access benefits of D and H, and they have a greater impact on Renton Village Place. However, like Options F and G, they do provide collector distributer bypass roads between Talbot and Lind. This may have operational benefits, but we would like more information to address our concern about weaving (described above). 7. Options C and E were rejected. Option C essentially eliminates an parking area and appears to just dump traffic onto Renton Village Place without any other improvements and with relatively sharp ramp turns. Option E also eliminates the same parking area as Option C, but goes on to take out more parking to the north be creating a new access street in an existing parking area. In review, Options D and H seem to provide the most economic benefit, which we would support. However, because these Options put all the local traffic through the Talbot intersection, they may not function well. EDNSP's top priority is to support an effective and achievable interchange option. At the same time, we want to make sure that the options that have the collector -distributor bypass roads are not re-creating the weaving that has been so troublesome in this area in the past. Next steps would include getting a larger City discussion about these options, including input from the Administration. As lead on the 1-405 project, we would expect the Transportation Division to carry this discussion forward. As always, EDNSP will remain a resource and is willing to provide any assistance that may be necessary. Feel free to call me (x6589) if you want to discuss our review or to coordinate carrying forward a staff recommendation. Thanks again for the opportunity to review these interchange ideas. CC: Meyer, Sandra; Pietsch, Alexander; Wolters, Ben; Woolley, Keith Keith Woolley - 1-405 Southern Alignment Page 1 From: Shawna Mulhall To: Afzali, Nick Date: 4/6/2004 4:38:16 PM Subject: 1-405 Southern Alignment EDNSP has reviewed the southern alignment options and the only substantive comment was to be sure that there were no other potenital alignement solutions that didn't have less impact. The "best fit" option tries to minimize impacts but still generates some concern. While WSDOT and their consultants have indicated that the ""best fit" alternative does minimize the impacts as much as possible, we are hoping that a solution will emerge that has even fewer impacts. Thank you for the opportunity to review these alignments. As the alignment options move forward for a wider discussion, we will continue to offer our support for the project. If you have any questions or need any additonal information, please feel free to call. Shawna CC: Meyer, Sandra; Pietsch, Alexander; Wolters, Ben; Woolley, Keith C) Ln NIP MIME! Z:l 4W AT WOr- P,,V *Arr -- IF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ESTABLISHING A COOPERATIVE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON AND THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE I-405 CONGESTION RELIEF & BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECTS THIS Memorandum of Understanding is made this day of April 2004, between the City of Renton and the Washington State Department of Transportation (hereinafter referred to as WSDOT). 1. BACKGROUND WSDOT is a department of state government with all powers, duties, and functions to coordinate transportation modes and to develop and maintain a statewide transportation system meeting the needs of the State of Washington as provided in RCW chs. 47.01. WSDOT owns and operates an extensive system of highways, high occupancy vehicle lanes, and access ramps serving general purpose traffic, transit and carpools. The City of Renton is an incorporated municipality, with the following adopted vision, mission, and business plan goals (2004-2009): Vision - Renton: A world -class city where people choose to live, work, and play. Mission - The City of Renton, in partnership with residents, businesses, and schools is dedicated to: • Providing a healthy atmosphere to live and raise families • Encouraging responsible growth and promoting economic vitality • Creating a positive community work environment • Meeting service demands through innovation and commitment to excellence Business Plan Goals - • Promote citywide economic development • Promote neighborhood revitalization • Promote the City's image in the community and region • Meet the service demands that contribute to the livability of the community • Influence regional decisions that impact the City 04/02/2004 - DRAFT - Page 1 of 8 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) The complete vision for the multimodal redevelopment of I-405 was developed during a three-year EIS process that established consensus on transit, roadway, and environmental investments to be made over the next 20 years. The Final EIS describes that complete vision, or Master Plan, and it received approval with the Record of Decision in October 2002. The FEIS focused on broad issues. Subsequent environmental analysis, documentation, and review will be prepared for site -specific, project -level details. As part of the FEIS process, participating agencies signed -off on three concurrence points. The City of Renton signed off on all three concurrence points, with the following written conditions (summarized) for two of the three concurrence points: Concurrence Point 1— September 15, 2000 1. ...make sure that accessibility of neighborhoods and communities to I-405 is emphasized... 2. Sensitivity of Renton's sole source drinking water aquifer to possible contamination must be considered. 3. In order to minimize the impacts on Renton neighborhoods, improvements to I-405 should be within existing right-of-way. 4. Impacts on neighborhoods should be minimized/mitigated. Avoid anymore "takes" to Renton Hill. 5. Any final option needs to adequately address the SR-167/I-405 interchange situation. 6. Any grade separation of Rainier Avenue/Grady Way should not impact adjacent businesses. 7. The City may desire to limit arterial improvements along Duvall Road/Jones Road and 140t' to five lanes. Concurrence Point 3 — April 9, 2002 1. All arterial improvements ... (Duvall Ave, Carr Rd, SW 27d' St) ... will be eligible for funding. 2. The I-405 Program identifies the SW 27d' St interchange as fully funded and the NE 440' St interchange as partially funded WSDOT projects. 3. The final SR 167/I-405 interchange improvement needs to consider the Rainier/Grady intersection operations and economic development considerations. 4. The Sound Transit capital program must be compatible with the I-405 Corridor Program. 5. Added hill climbing and/or collector distributor lanes must demonstrate transportation benefits and avoid, limit, and mitigate impacts to neighborhoods. 6. Noise impacts are of concern to the City. 7. Floodplain, runoff, water quality, groundwater, fish habitat, and wetland impacts to the local jurisdiction may be too great to allow for mitigation on a watershed level. 04/02/2004 - DRAFT - Page 2 of 8 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The I-405 Corridor Program proposes to implement a multimodal system of transportation improvements to reduce traffic congestion and improve personal and freight mobility throughout the I-405 corridor over the next 20 to 30 years. For the I-405 Corridor Projects, WSDOT has separated I-405 into five segment. WSDOT identifies the South Renton/Tukwila (herein after referred to as South Renton) segment as I-405 south of the Cedar River to I-5. WSDOT identifies the North Renton segment as I-405 from the Cedar River north to I-90. Nickel Project On April 27, 2003 the Washington State Legislature approved gas tax funding of $485 Million Dollars, for projects within the I-405 portion of "Nickel Projects". The funding provides for environmental, design and construction of Nickel Projects as well as "5% Design" of the Master Plan. The new facilities and services included within the Renton Nickel Project include: • One additional I-405 northbound auxiliary lane between the SR 181 on - connection and the SR 167 off -connection. • One additional I-405 southbound auxiliary lane between the SR 169 on - connection and the SR 167 off -connection, including replacement of the Benson Road S. structure. • Extension of the SR 167 southbound HOV lane north to I-405. Implementation Plan The I-405 Executive Committee endorsed a $4.7B Implementation Plan on October 2, 2003. The Implementation Plan in the North Renton and South Renton segments includes the following elements. Interchange and ramp design specifics will continue to be refined through the design process, traffic analysis and development of funding packages. • Improves multi -modal corridor continuously from I-5 in Tukwila to SR 522 in Bothell • Adds one lane in each direction from I-5 to SR 167 in Tukwila • Adds two lanes in each direction from SR 167 in Tukwila to SE 8th Street in Bellevue • On SR 167, adds one additional lane in each direction between I-405 and S. 180th Street • Constructs Bus Rapid Transit line with stations, HOV direct access ramps, park -and -ride lots, and bus service • Expands the vanpool program Master Plan The Master Plan is the Preferred Alternative as identified in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). The Implementation Plan, previously identified, was endorsed in part because tackling the Master Plan's list of more than 300 improvements could take 20 years or more, and is estimated to cost nearly $11 billion in 2002 dollars — more than 04/02/2004 - DRAFT - Page 3 of 8 the amount of funding currently available to re -develop at that large a scale. The Master Plan is detailed in Attachment A. 3. PURPOSE Based on the background in the previous section, it is mutually agreed as follows. Planning, designing, constructing and operating the I-405 Corridor improvements are complex tasks, requiring maximum cooperation between COR and WSDOT. The purpose of this Memorandum of Understanding is to establish working principles by and between COR and WSDOT to facilitate the design, construction, and operation of capital projects of those portions of the Nickel and Implementation Plan that reside within the COR. 4. GOALS The goals of this MOU are as follows: • Describe the general relationship between WSDOT and COR that will facilitate delivery of the Nickel Projects and the 5% Design beginning from the early stages of planning [such as NEPA Environmental Assessment document(s)] throughout the final stages of construction. • Commit to expedited processes for planning, designing and constructing projects and integrating programs. • Provide attachments pertaining to the relationship between WSDOT and COR as well as the overall I-405 Project's organizational structure. • Declare intent to execute future Memorandums of Agreement to implement the Nickel Project, and as funding becomes available, the projects within the Implementation Plan. 5. PRINCIPLES A. Nickel and Implementation investments are first and foremost to improve access, speed, and reliability of the I-405 corridor for the traveling public and public transit, and will provide benefit to the COR and its constituents. B. The projects and services implemented for I-405 will be of high quality, consistent with approved financial plans, and open for service on schedule. C. It is acknowledged that both the COR and WSDOT are committed to high -quality transportation services and the long-term interests of the citizens of the I-405 Corridor. 04/02/2004 - DRAFT - Page 4 of 8 D. It is acknowledged that in addition to COR comments submitted during the EIS process, the COR has submitted written comments (October 29, 2003) as part of the North Renton Environmental Assessment scoping effort. (see Attachment B) E. WSDOT and COR will coordinate respective capital programs to take advantage of opportunities to reduce cost and increase benefit. Allocation arrangements will be negotiated within individual agreements between relevant entities to ensure that the cost of joint projects is assigned on a proportional basis. F. WSDOT and COR will work together to pursue additional grants or other funds where value can be added to specific capital projects or where added projects can add significant benefits to I-405 mobility. G. Construction schedules will be coordinated and managed such that disruption to the public and construction contracting community is kept at acceptable levels. H. Recognizing the above principles and the complexities of the tasks involved in them, COR and WSDOT will expedite processes, including but not necessarily limited to: • Identify qualified representatives to ensure timeliness and effectiveness of discussions and decisions. • Organize functions to ensure good communication between team representatives and between teams and the respective organizations. • Assure the respective organizations will expedite the reviews and approvals related to this Memorandum of Understanding within the agreed upon schedules. • Processes will be evaluated on an on -going basis to minimize time required to design and construct projects, and when possible, run processes in parallel instead of sequentially. I. WSDOT will perform the lead role on I-405 Corridor community involvement and provide public information and involvement roles for COR when appropriate. J. Issues of conflict will be referred to the appropriate resolution process to reach agreement expeditiously and at the lowest level of hierarchy. The spirit of these discussions will ensure rapid resolution, maximum cooperation, respect for financial responsibilities, and high integrity of individuals and organizational missions. 04/02/2004 - DRAFT - Page 5 of 8 6. STRUCTURE City Design Team COR will, in coordination with WSDOT, provide a recommended list of Renton City staff to comprise the I-405 "City Design Team". This committee will be referred to as the CDT. In coordination with WSDOT, the CDT will assess design impacts to the City and develop design recommendations/solutions. The CDT will provide a central COR forum by which WSDOT can bring preliminary design sketches and information to gain COR feedback. The WSDOT will provide the South Renton and North Renton Contract Managers, the S. Renton/N. Renton/Bothell Segment Manager, and as appropriate other WSDOT staff or consultants to support the CDT. Task Forces As appropriate, the CDT will form Task Forces to coordinate on specific issues. The Task Force will appoint a chair to report back to the CDT. The Task Forces will cease when the reason for forming has been resolved. As the project progresses, the CDT will also continue to provide feedback to WSDOT as the Design Builder selected to build the Renton section of I-405 projects brings refined designs to WSDOT for approval. Administrators Executive Committee The COR will form an Administrators Executive Committee for the CDT to provide updates to, make recommendations to, and to receive policy direction from. This committee will represent the COR for final issue resolution. This committee will also provide recommendations to and seek policy direction from the mayor and city council. See Attachment C for the organizational structure of COR/WSDOT coordination. 7. SCHEDULE The following is the planned schedule for the Renton segment work: November 2003 CDT Members Designated November 2003 First CDT Meeting - to continue monthly after first meeting January 2004 Mainline "Best Fit" Analysis Briefing to CDT. Late January 2004 Nickel and Implementation Plan Evaluation and Determination of Final Mainline Configuration April 2004 South Renton EA Design Refinements Public and Agency Scoping Meetings Fall 2004 Potential RTID Public Vote Summer 2005 NEPA South Renton Project Clearance July 2005 Begin Right of Way Negotiations and Acquisitions April 2007 Award Design/Build Contract June 2008 Design -Build Design Complete June 2010 Project Complete 04/02/2004 - DRAFT - Page 6 of 8 8. FUTURE UNDERSTANDINGS AND AGREEMENTS This Memorandum of Understanding is intended to provide the principles that describe the relationship between WSDOT and COR. It is further understood that as the relationship develops, it may be appropriate to add to the principles or modify those stated herein. In addition, it is expected that more specificity will be needed to guide the relationship as particular programs or projects develop. A schedule with defined project milestones will be developed. The COR will develop a process of how to work with city staff and a process to work with their elected officials. WSDOT and COR will develop a process for COR to give formal input to WSDOT at concurrence points. It is anticipated that the COR will adopt "resolutions" through their city council at these concurrence points. Decisions made at concurrence points will be final, and the WSDOT and COR will not come back and revisit. Memorandums of Agreement will be executed at these concurrence points. It is anticipated that specific requirements to be placed on the design, construction, and maintenance of the I-405 Project in order to address COR concerns will be included in future Memorandums of Agreement to be executed with WSDOT. 9. FUNDING It is mutually agreed that each agency will fund their respective costs associated with staff time for coordination. WSDOT will provide staffing as needed to assist in the City Design Team's work. WSDOT and the COR will, on a case -by -case basis, negotiate costs associated with the need for Consultants to assist with COR coordination, review, and comments. 10. AMENDMENTS This Memorandum of Understanding and its exhibits may be amended at any time by mutual agreement of the parties. 11. INDEMNIFICATION Appropriate, reasonable, indemnification agreements shall be negotiated in good faith for each project agreement. 04/02/2004 - DRAFT - Page 7 of 8 12. ENDORSEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto hereby agree to the terms and conditions of this Memorandum of Understanding as of the date first written above. For Washington State Department of For City of Renton Transportation Name Title Name Title 04/02/2004 - DRAFT - Page 8 of 8 Attachment A The I-405 Master Plan within the North Renton and South Renton segments includes the following: Lanes • One additional eastbound general-purpose lane under I-5, connecting SR-518 to I-405 with a two-lane section. Two additional lanes in each direction of I-405 from the 1-405/I-5 (Tukwila) interchange to the I-405/I- 90 interchange. One additional auxiliary lane in each direction of SR-167, southbound from I-405 to the SW 4151 off - connection, and northbound from the S. 180'h on -connection to 1-405. Interchanges • Reconstruct the I-405/I-5 Tukwila Interchange by constructing a freeway -to -freeway direct connector for eastbound SR-518 to northbound I-405 general-purpose traffic, and constructing freeway -to - freeway direct connectors between I-5 and east I-405 for HOV traffic. • Removal of the Tukwila Parkway to northbound I-405 "slip" ramp and extension of the Tukwila Parkway east over the Green River to a new intersection with SR- 181. This improvement will provide traffic on Tukwila Parkway access to northbound 1-405 through the reconstructed south half of the I- 405/SR-181 interchange. • Reconstruction of the south half of the 1-405 SR-181 (northbound only) interchange to connect the I- 405 northbound off -ramp to the proposed Tukwila Parkway extension. • Reconstruct the SR 167 interchange as two independent interchanges at a shared location: o One interchange to handle the I-405 to SR-167 system -to -system traffic by constructing a freeway -to -freeway direct connector for southbound I-405 to southbound SR-167 general-purpose traffic, constructing a freeway -to -freeway direct connector for northbound SR-167 to southbound I-405 general-purpose traffic, constructing freeway -to -freeway direct connectors between SR-167 and both north and south I-405 for HOV traffic, improving the northbound SR 167 to northbound I-405 and northbound I-405 to southbound SR167 ramps, realigning Rainier Avenue South (SR- 167) so the section north of I-405 connects to East Valley Road south of I-405, and constructing two new ramps connecting south SR-167 with East Valley Road in the vicinity of SW 341s Street. o A second interchange to handle 1-405 to local (Renton) streets traffic by constructing a one-way frontage road couplet system with proposed I-405 connections to Talbot and Lind, and no connections to SR-167. • Reconstruct SR-169 Interchange - replace with a SR-169/N Yd Street split diamond interchange. • Reconstruct I-405/Park Interchange to accommodate mainline widening. • Reconstruct NE 30t' Interchange to accommodate mainline widening. • Reconstruct NE 44th Interchange to accommodate mainline widening and future area improvements. • Reconstruct/Relocate NE 112'h to accommodate mainline widening and proposed transit improvements. • Reconstruct Coal Creek Interchange to accommodate mainline widening. Structures • Replacement of the 61" Avenue South, 66'h Avenue South, Lind Avenue Southwest, and Benson Road South structures over I-405 to accommodate the widened I-405. • Reconstruct May Creek bridge. HOV Direct Access • Construct an SR-167 HOV direct access at SW 27`h Street. • Construct I-405 HOV direct accesses at Tukwila in the vicinity of the commuter rail station and at Rainier Avenue South. 04/02/2004 - Attachment A - Page 1 of 2 • Construct a HOV-DA facility at 761h Street (vicinity of NE 44th Interchange). • Construct an In -Line transit station west of the NE 1121h Park & Ride • Expanding Park & Ride facilities (location undetermined). Future Accommodations • Accommodates future NB & SB Direct Connector ramps between I-405 and SR-169. • Accommodates proposed Sound Transit HOV-DA facility at N 8`h. • Accommodate future truck climbing/auxiliary lanes. 04/02/2004 - Attachment A - Page 2 of 2 CYTY OF RENTON R PlanningBuilding/PublicNVorksT)epirhiietit layor Gregg Vniniernian RE, Administrator ('X,tolx,-r 29,12003 Christina khartinez, 1405 Environmental Lead Wash4ig(on Stag; Department of Transportation t Jrban Corridors, ()ffic:g, 6431 Corson Avenue South, NB92-230 Seattlej WA 98109-3445 ,41QWXCT-- 1-405% N,0%771 RFNTQN PROJEC7 19k ' , OftkR(M' -SUSSM-EANT $COOING, COMMENTS . , IENTAL A Dear I'v4s, )Martine?; 'The, CitX,6f Renton subipits the following comments for consider'atio'n with regards to the Mirth:"Rentoh Fttyailal As=imcul Scra ping ping, 6 J* dwater fbr over �w p 901/64T. )1"',� Ovate six d6li '18S. WIA - r-,"w aqti*hU, been 11 4.54,10 �41 U01*k ion: Ion WS0 0*"iy, the U. 6-A 4614V all are all and SR Jm -405 between t -AW-111tin n- -a Y oh a u*#per day. Jr.4* !k-bW M iblu, ojl� a atp bi "pitblui rp�, ip okaiion 4-the: walls isconsl �'a fe&Sij;1li x6tvand, edlydgwlqgickvesttion ' gust`40 4ttermine not only I y t,*0 * new ivells -6�, -bb- con.qM00, htit', i , fio if they p rovi a lit4,4yWwater meeting state and feWm water quality standards. Additional water Ith 0, rr n *ater�duality ft (Wjfies(i.e.: new watOrfiltrafion plot)'hj4 I u e t Y W ,1#n-*., opted key liju Depaft"�" 1,of HWth. Pur&= or 1011 V ii�' f properties inoJudi t'City wi,lVhe,,needb4, for the: new wells and fAcilifics. Test wells must ,bq-Ju&:"d, pump tested,# urn ,04 Depp-tment of Ecology rnay not allow t1i ,l0q"t;�ykId `1U 6';" W41 h o60,16-p hial`itnagat3is`toinstreamflow. Tmsferof*aterri8fii§Will'1" approved 1by F-Colo en of th t ology and, e Muckleshoot tribe can require'nij%, mitigation measures if the tw ws during s, (tvater treatment facilities must Iii-I W:"an IMP-21CL to river flPLImping O r�_ The newwoll49 be;con#ruc1cd and U,- operotional for- several ye.ars to ensurea reliabjolqpply before the existing wells This entire pnv& L,�:ilioytakc lip to tGis y.l,ors or more, 1055 South Ufad Way - Renton, Washington -98055 (i This Pabov conoi., 5vi, mcycw mawal. Post "-ssurw RENTON� AIIEAD OF THE CVRVE 1-405 North Remott Projeel October 2' , 2003 Page 2 The limited prr)r-'ram-leval Qrolifulwatcr ArmlvSV4 "'},own in !itcik->n 3. 5,2: ? t'iiatcr Rcsourc;t: Grotindwaicr of the Project t FEPAISFYA Preliminary Final FAS Find f-Mal Prelinlrrtary Scction 4(1) EvahratiOri (Wed March 2002, including the referenced study 1405 corridor Program Draft Oroundwater Resources Expertise Report by CI12M 11111, 400 1 b, does not provide sufficient information to determine the impact of the 1-4 05 North Renton llrgjact on the quantity and quality of groundwater to the City's wells. 11c impact to water quality and water quantity,from construction of structures Across the well field must be thoroughly studied and evaluated. 'lie construction of fly -over ramp within the sanitary control area: on€: hundred feet radius,_ will put t e City. water' supply at risk for contamination .arid violates the j)rovisitiors ill tits WA"C'`246-2 .i35 :on stti -water protection. The uonsirticiioi) of support pilin s,inay stfectthe flow of Watcr to the in the gtrantity ol,Walcr pr(Auc;cd by the ;•ells urtiny degradation of well water qualityresuliii) ,hlon the construction and operation,,oftltc.1_405 irnlxrovcraler14: must beinvestigated and rerYtediated; t 1r4r %>EJt "s expense. Remediation may inclittio tote oui�str ctian replacement well{s}_ icalsused;fornstrtn csSttprttruirtures could "SupplY. Adequate vei'tical cle irt}nce,: t l et above the:.existin� well building.,mWe -must be, providtxi rari access by, well drt'ikng rim; `so.t -w01ls can be redeveloped in the �� �t -and cit aran� i�tr c r € Intl st pr viti tee r mcl4' ?> a pumps andcolumns for m;�jtttcttaTl�,. Access for cite�li : dcly;tirii��tdttst �ie;rt�a�xtai�d,; M A. 0�r 4na�ip�l_Cticl RISC "' at> Swfwv- +urn'iittrU xxwtr,u n.; ivities an+d operation phases + ` l#e j�wrttjec t. ust not i>t vtltet tt�trltt itt Z$Iwli��bae— 0 r"0(>lt�tt� Exweo , of tlxi City°s agt at�"�>� a: l ttt slro � n O 4tenticm Ponds, tr eater ' + ,tcll� �?s�dev%ded,ta containititll girl Who Over -- Ct r='fiver: br-d ' S1-pports a e to be installs ith the `, -. , verbed to prevent;: pt'OIn W'4fthd sift seal in the ti Oe Co istrti i t tandairds {R.Mi00 Standards shall b I if: dUr ng'catistruction, more thari..2A gallons -hazardous matmii is w311 be stored on site or on site. Fill Source Statement (RMC 4-4-0601A): A fill source statement is required iftnorethan 50 cubic yards - of fill materi#rl will be imported to the prr; , ri".File 5>-t'TAP-Tnryp;+nar5pn Mtnin) 6i Artr Mr niir?TJI)`-)?..• Te, Msrcmt M rh ming Trojeetll4'SLigT r:.105.N kts+tar.'dd rter:caa [-A �i:y ratesYR.Ctr: tM 1,405 North Renton Project October 27, 2003 Page I PARKS Cedar River Park Due to the existing active recreation uses including an outdoor aquatic facility and sun bath in&, area and soccer field, there shall be no shade extending more than 5W southwest from the existing northeast park property line along the Maple Valley- I lighway (line drawn parallel to the existing park pr(j)qrty fillic). Any sbadc in the; pnrkarva will in- Wtea bornifigalml. In addition, any shade extending ,into tile R41118fic MR] fie l A - , juiligg.8tt'd by also taking into rca Will nee to N account tile loss of reveitue from a dccrease in fici I it), use taused by, the Due to tile, cxislirig, usm, ificlildiOB, all otild0or Witialie llwiilitv/sunbathing area and soccer field, noise impacts will need tabe nfitigaftdwidi a.,kowid barrier. X; -Adti itional.i6foOT)a1k,11) mg8rding ft. 61tval i0D 01, tbc..* Cli'-,'I in M40t tf3 Ae0i'minepotential additional ini.pacts to the water ,.5:1 16J q ..9me I ltapl*mr� �t) Wal 11m, PO4 .,$Oiti6titYAU6ZAStho,rompsnecessitating an inortaft in noise end air quality m ftigoi I om ; L-ossz4t%t 0--ParkWnd-aad air space }'ill fusel tho CcdarAiwr Ttdjl Wd to W rt, W-04 in kind I WAkft,41W WWI Ai -espec i ally the 00im-to the pool ficlljty�, t 416 Acky, vis>ran MV,not-acce '14 avy, to" Or. *4niantewmce fiehh�yard area or maintcn4nee re lxe ablut"i 'rs aced to, a6d, t, a0d SD ii I&g I A 'o totftatmon'' UM laidscape am" wide hadeenma"entinWbits, thereby TM., pffwitii time, Jftft i�'Dftrn *,014;xd in qrdek-t6 maintain the P, `J�_ P.d �U Wap :and irriplion Wflf. d and appraised 46) Big Lftrmapk�tkw east of 1-405 will nee pprOxn1l A, appraised1)), a ecrtifiled nrbOist. the City, Wjjj Mx1di I k `*netaiy reimbursement for the appraised replacement 12- Prior tq construction',a cortified arIA)rist will �o Al Irces wilb A tree canopy --extending intoanyproposed construction limn, ri cc d-arborist report will he required Ibr cacti tree identifying recommendations for tree proteetiop, Vepial pmnipg practices,,etc, to be utilized during the construction pha5p 11.1rRCS?S%11tr- I rbpis M mmifts A bAC,!yt,�, 1.40-5 Noilh Ronlon 11rojeO October 2' _ 200') Page .4 11. The ('fly will rcquirk: a cei ified arborisl perfonn all tre:c: root pruning, limb removal, limb pruning, tree pr►duwork, etc. 14. The City will rucluire a licensed landscape contractor to install all landscape elements including: plant materials, soilfsced, topsoil and irrigation, 15. Tlic:rc: shall be no net lass Of parking in Cedar River Park. Any less will need to be replaced. Any hogs of parkland tread loss ol'u,"blu parkland through (hu creation of replacement parkinu -.All need to he mitigated through in kind replaccinew witltiii llte Cedar River Trail Corridor system 1%;ated between Lake VC Ashington and Ron Regis bark. IG. 111e prOposed dec oralive ttgj�te vsalt alortg SR 16i9 (as part of 1hc; SR 1,69 project) will treed to be preserved and frntecte& Ifthewatl 3.c removed and replaced, the reI)Iacemen wall ♦+gill require: the: same artwork itteprVoraVd Mt+ts fl a ing process. AftfbLI ojecd facing a17, b: biSe wjllls cc}v tdp prs # rt'} Ttc,cct :lCi #nee�t it tc itrchi#ectitral elements constste i;;# ug park and recreational to hitectural featuies Ireo Prather ,:�tt t' T6l , Gtr t' 8,`:t kY � ?;aG s {,poltee end re atxtt ti'�Il ncees5 to the Nnrc o PrOPO4Y rttm. i l A tt, of h t%be tniirntained at ail t es. �axt„t irtclttd,nly rx vw clessc i n�tr�tjt�filti trinerlency and tiers n�' ; itQ rho 1er :. „ c i ttii rrtt f ? f aritl iiicyi:ie statIdard6,,, i . a n caiktle _park7and'tt -mace ill ncccl 1zr sc t#J v lam. Ae.CuDdar river Trail 3.: Ti�rxtiI '1161n � l�ivr #lt r'tlt�c river, to the N"ttrt' iht�tirtecl� Any .� tI. DWydOramo..And;1 'ail 'ark i�tist i�iai�riatn � "' � ` 1>�raiil systetnt, ...... lPritt Yo corisftucti '° t1, Ge t q tt d iCQ �t rite zil l t >l C"PY t �cic.t Bing into any:prtt t lion 1 itts, incluclin nod litiai#ed to ter es of utonsob way and Wmagr ' 1Way.- =A ne AWtacl. ailxwisl mport will. '% reg6irud for each tree identi tg recommatt6tions #or try protection, Vw roaio s` 'etc, to be utilized during the , Cans�i�tait �bas�(s), :.. k try tj':l3ronsnit `tiVsty° will r►cud to, .bc e:valuateil ttnil`;kipprxisccl by a terrified arhorist if r'eirtctvid is,,,,ro ctd. 'fire City will require monetary reirnhatsemetnt tier ilic appra sed replacxmumit ,value-, 4. The City will require a perRmn all trcc..root prttniing, tit he rcMoval, limb pruning, tree spadeNv rk. etc. !1"J"�►eSq{.7Tc1`.-TrMv.+gY.ixiCu P:amain4u !•ropammingiflW-lU- Crsnspatu�n Ylan��ng,%IJ�CC�f �'Rj�1)V1 )JiySW ltv�Wn4Y RsnlUc+tA Y'dy Cwh�rnloL�.tF,iv`,w� 1-4US lNortli Renton Pro.icct October '200"') 5. (he Citywill require licensed landscape contractorto install all landscapeelcmenis includln-: I)IM111 materials, sodiseW, topsoil and irrigation. G. 'there shall be no net loss of parking. Any loss will need to he replaced_ Any losi of parkland and loss of usable parkland through the creation of replacement parking will need to be mitigate'd thraugh in kind replacement within tbo Cedar River Trail Corridor -system located between Lake Washington and Ron Regis Park. 7- T'he.:;,Ios.e proximity of the proposed relocated House* AVav to the skate park creates safety and access coneww: that need to be add d. Any solution must provide safe access from Uqu r INTay to e th skate park (for skating) and around the skate. park (between the well house buildiog 04 the skate park). for Reds —,tf ian access. S. New noise wallg.-.609n"ed asVart-or, �-a facing rty-, rived v _)p c (W park prope to.; arch itectunil 00tacift b0psisfaA,4* rwrrMiona) arubitevairal r 9 '-'1'VwAJ 'to-, -d in kind within the C 'd Jr il Loss Oirkhmil iiii(i ok somt wild iolacr P �Corridor systein. mv c-4-eek 1A A suitbit w Ov 0. Wi dMaYC.rk"* t_g�d will) t",' 4 #k* �Wl "und barr Ise _ed to be-4 4 Afid* ilie, t 'y to these parka: 4 bt pre(mdin.g. 146,:Wevw.,, to� M�A= W ange c on Given the firsttw- an ali nmeni. an Onflaurati '-A 9 determine if it is po" Oblo to provide for future -11yover tamps that will, afloNy du'*4 4 to North Renton. prQject.:should provide water quantity Control (detention) and water quality improvements for all and proposed irnproVements,, Ue quantity and quality controls should be designed in acu6Tdancte with the Iffershington State Deptr'tment of EcoloP, Sform'wafvr, Memagement Monualfor Western W(mhinglon Or equivalem standaMs. If WSDOT storm systems currently disc 4 orsi re prtipoged to discharge to CRY: storm kysltrji"R' 1J'1Q SyStC111 CO.P.861.ics should be":AnAtkoo and improvementi made,:as part of the pr6jeet-as needed.. Water quality oriel quantity impacts Aould be mitigated such that there is no impact immediately downstream of the project, atelfshed h9sed 1-40.5 North Renton Project Octobi• r 27. 2t103 Paa6 mitigation will need to show that there are no temporary or long-term illIPMAS (11142 Its OK:remsed peak rate and volume of runoff, along with changed water quality, downstream of the project even if tipstrealil ofl= site mitigation is proposed .by the project. if off -site watershed mitigation cannot fully mitigate the quandlY and quality impalas to the downstream systems (stream or constructed storm systems), then downstream Ti11tigallon Will alticl tx: rc gliircd. At a minimum, the project should be held to a "no net loss' of wetland area, function. and value. Rcpjap_rJpcnt ratios liar vvutland mitigation should, at,a rninimuxn; sgi* Renton's -wettatnd replacement mtiris.fot c-�l�erlt] icitpneis its Rwitom M- art lnmt of &-ology's orArmy Cor'Fs of Engineers' replacement -ratios should be _ acceptable : if they are equal to or more str n1vnt thau Rrmton'"s. Wetland mitigation -should be done in the some Wsin and as close as possible to where; :lam iq)p&Pt %-tars. WSDOT sboald esttti fish wetland mitigation Wks in' the basins vv ere w6.tltinds viil tom. t1* led` by aloe" prcrjeet Iltd bush doe wetland baTtks ag.requir "by tide $fiAte'S `'4'etl itd .tl�� n&11 e. This Will erasure ti ff tla c tt+�cl we iaricls pit: t blishi tl, of d'have the satde l`tti cti ati"ice> * ue; sit a a+vetla#tid that is 3o be in4act;4 pr4or tothe mettand:l)e>ng;"filled by tho projw- roje t hauid prefuiejc ril tigl�top , to prtivttlfi. lid' "tire air" l�"',o "streatri bu sx area, htnctiott, and lttt?lt liltio the projBCt`S it3l Gis iq #1.4i.lTttl ilitltc, awl�in ;, rctrrit>g,,Hiell li€ir ar) xlt0111ct bc: beld to tet's#sAdard. R00 ift l^tent ratios (2:l) ,i i';tMpactS to stream buffers aitd E'i i3:ltahit�tt �i;oulcl be 1W MogtdWri should be: incorporated at the loustxolx �01he impact: tp tine Maximum Aegree hle* i tit ;i di iotinl iniiigh orl Wtild br ti p'x`i[isite within the same basin or wmla i> }t can �t fd be a taf?lisl�ed for acquisiit t� r Situation, CrX Goa tiGlii cst' l i tttt lytal 'Gr 'tiriilic r Ye #rears <iettiE benefiotal " imrtii,tltn h$t, °lire howld °have a- 1 be'r t+wt. f`>h pa.��sge So J'a e, M11pm ments : to r� i 'k, art tut <tn ro stt?itv'ribt':s Eentifli fk dig trot' ,street with lrt annu�il'r�m l "af liments".3ti 'doe ci I> E 4Jrd �t1`eetr �ixrth ilk. te�liStl"ryCtlon of the NF;�ltlt +7�Ct IIIICt'Kr}til[Tk,7.C:, titt� pt�ic�n#i�t1 Co1r Tributary 0283 with l4ia r k exists Un ,method for doing thisIs replacing the culvcris xith open channels as osed fq,Coal Creek and connecting Tributary 0283, wittF tie Labe Washington Bolflevard. wlikh:convey water to May Creek_ FL(�(tMs�'; The, pntj4ct should be required to provldc compensatory storage for filling Hof any floodplain. A ``zero Fjii'n to the . loodway standard shouild U.ajaplied to the project. The project 'is also r tlu. , d to cornply with all FFAIA .and Nation FlotxUlusumice Program (NFIP) standards, since Federal funding will be •used. No encroachment into the flooftlikin should bte ailldwed, unless through a hydraulic analysis, it can be demoristrated that the,zero rise stmitlard curt be 8ell icved. Tlie hydotilic analysis .should be based upon future land use condition 1.00-year 06.45d flows. All bridge crossings oftedar River Hurt Nlay,CrWk should l the full span oftht 100-year floodplain; i.e. no piers; abutments, etc. should be located in the H Wile Cye.TR9, 1tLas—fimRmningh PmgmMmini-Tile 16- X"Ft* 'V lig*.n EA Ccr Cwn.-esris d�;4or I-105 North Remon Project Oclohur 27_ 2003 Pate 100-year floWplain. New bridge. low( clt+xcl ek,valiuns (bcrt(orn of the: bri4,igo) sltuuld bG ;cc:1 <rbcavV tltt litlun- Nod a +,: condition IW-y(,_qr Ilood elc;vaiion by a minimurn of t.hrcc feel, or higher on slrtams or rivers with the potential for large del tis t1mvs- Por 111c: Flood Insurance Jkftrpping,S'tudy, April 2003 prelmml by Nurtirwusa Hydraulic Cmistrlonits; [he pedestrian bridge under 1405 experiences partial or complete pressure flow during the i00- year flood event. It might be possible to remedy this situation by raising or reconstructing the pedestrian bridge coincidentally with the proposed 1-405 'a bprovemezits at the Cedar Fiver crossing. S41'01MWA'i CK W1 iTWS: The I-405 right-f4WWcrentes a moor hydraulic :analy►M 'df ail existing and performed. to verify.that the`system s lit for future land ..OW conditions; 14h+e s sboulol ize roplad .vhth a properly si conveyance can be provided actow t drainage probl htr fit 4¢ i should bt fatly poordlna� ie of (bu riced �`tir,powyi(ial U, R City ofenvm qufface V►'at(O drainUe:ggo t t��3lity to pr is a sty to utility services. Regarding stgnniNgter;,a hydrologic and ed . cu verts, and storm systeins .that 40s,s J-405, 'should be gttate rapacity to coire 140=yearr<-hour stn`ovepfi indi aces that the system Ilea in'stifficiont:capaduy, then it +tit : This ag ncc is l to ensure chat .adequate, sWrmwater 5 c ridcar and that the project '�1.1 t q *004te upstream` ns tbdt d ,hoVeAo be relocatettr ., ctrd �y the project 44hik,46d relocation — all 4k 46 �the ,(Ay_ h review s s=rzil tulcl also be ti iM wit (lid:. ate fttlrricr.probl+am that I-4Y resozits.to the ,naturat ale i e to areas -upstream of' -t105, inventory%, it'1 he�cz1'ts as a `t'he>p ject sho d.crarztply w t .#lie-cdtt c ly adopted I3 ashingfiv State is ltvret It Management Crtixrlelrnez and:CiEy atiupW Master Shoreline Program regtt ons: , 'l RANSPORrA N: C, ity ?krtertals aid Local Streets Impacts to traffic ,Oatterns and voluttaes cry City arterials and local streets ,need identified and mitigated- These impacts potea#ially include. , but fete -not limited to: ■ The cul-de-sac of Motes hileadow,and Factory .Avenues at Bronson WaV; The additiot}tll capacity deeds on Mitt A.tienue, the Bronson Way bridge an4 ,#i -Logan .Avenue bridge over the Ge(W iver, Tr�tfi-n: pattcrzz rt~visiorts uzz Stlzlsci Roult.Yiirf) Nt j1►G SR ICTQIIYU�t}1 �r� �'tifii.R:t irtf+f4l1i1L1�� Hail t: Fyx.TkM - Tm""Mltiaa PlaaaiAv.,A Pntrammi kv:TRP-10. Tran%C.Nn tim Ptaminw J'N- i M?\l'9DM t-ORStN Rrraa:ti Ream PA dry (''amrsram t{ e4W 1-40 NOrltr Renton Proiec:t October ??_ 2_003 Page 8 Additional traffic signals or traffic signal revisions, such as can the Maple Valley Highway and NE Y'd Street; and, • "1`Ill l:Utltil:C:tl(fn of klouse'r Way North to Ilic SR 169 in(emb +nge., due to the loss of the Ilouser Way Twiriel. Neighborhoods and Businesses 'linpauls to traffic through neighborhoods -need to be identified and mitigated. Neighborhoods potentially it pacttd iriciudc tlrc; downlo%Nm Renton Ceyoral Bijsinvs!. District (CRD), the north Menton residential neigb&i hood, and the Highlan& o ighborl ood (duc to revke-41; Skjoset Roulovanl). Itt poets, such as acwss anti ;traffic pattxrt7s, to local busing . nted to be identified and mitigated. Fotentially impaetorl In1.4i11CTSq+M9 include those locauxt on Sunset aiaule ard, Aronson Way, Ncwth, 4faple Vtttley HiSli-waytoil Mails AVowe, Squth. tt�x7r ilt + cd api;<t-v is rd iotea i'aOse eOi,i't -i('n at Stiir'169/Nortb _1r"Strwt, pta(iestrimi.and ie ctirtrtedti ifv tact t n IQr#Ii. 1° at aa�ti i llt 1 1ra1{ey Hj$jf a rigid to be,dcrrtificcl. ''i'> affib,Modelingand 244mabdon. `llt moclelittg and Sintttl on child be cotxdtlotetl Using appropriate twls in order to f'utly icip>it)xy aitd >pt ,rs ct the "impacts on 1a 1 tl t 3aYs_ street$ 04 freeway inti°r s" l 'titi<rri oit tragtt tlt iC :modelins�such 'as ltlterseition ca}>treiTy anal t3i%ss, Is l Ids rid bet�tic:en#hr3:ti>!d+T3C3Tthr00g;s+te co>wspondence.,. 1'he North Renton Hoc%& O IS ideritiftes � capacity ncetf'in the Bark Avenue intcreharrf�c c9sitxklm w sorthbou nd traffic.. TU capacity needs of this interchange should be analyzed. For exartilile, it should h 44rmined if the ea aund to northbound loop ramp should be retained in the future design. It is proposed to eliminate the 1-405 ramps from Sunset Blvd.. Sunset Boulevard will go over or -under I- :405 and connect into the North Renton neighborhood local street system. It is the C:ity's pretemiee to have Sunset Boulevard go under I- 05, if possible. Traffic modeling should analyze the traffic; impacts due.io this reconfiguration of Sunset BOrrlctiard. JV'Ck-.3jik4Ki' LWSFr-141itmH.nair'glh Hr11mtiouhvxol'.WtiWtJ-4VjjST&numiYRwmmEA CityC�.u:cecns.d,la,r October l?- 21003 Page g Renton Hill Access, Ttte Septc mhcr 17, 2003 Pmliminhrr 1'1a,ris %11,5w tho lwo existing* ac:cess:overpasses (Cedar Avenue South and Renton Avcnuc South) being combined wto One accos, willi Ific overpmss ou tlie. Roiton Avt le. ..south alignment. Although south of the Cedar River, clue to its eh7 c proximity to tlic: North Rollo,, project limits, ��e offer the following perspectives regarding access to Renton Hill. I . A second access to Renton Hill needs to be provided. 2. Any impacts due to this second access need to be minimized and nutipated. 3. The second access should be cost effective. South Renton funds moved wiiti ihis secondary access alternative will.then be available for other sections of South Renton' WSDOT proposed several options fell' 4 second access to Renton Hill.-'lh, c�pfii�,� iodlude extending 7. either Grant Avenue ttth or Cedar Aa►enue South, south into the erg Mill t ei lil r sod; connIect either Mill Avenue 94iii i 0 Ocm$ 7't'Stiftt across J-405 to, South ,+l3tt titi.� City Hall and n s h�tx�sitcl; xienc :l ll Air u %u0i nortl oast, down the hill, i i to.ctttli .the existin,g N reo art?VbFty cn �r°ilia 1*;{+r .#itrer l�ricl�;;. W;�`�?tT And > f.'ity *41 otttitiit,te tip dtro prcfcrr cl ttltetr►.iiitie t rrca�ad : tlti f non l ac.cc ss. FAE,(,AR lfiere nre,.s eaai tt it tie c:t #�i l AtXWtI-property fkiat's v-d lolul rmCirmdlan&iu t tted: `lffy,t#4Gt's�ec�ssritlp illy hmje iinl�acts rt� t}ic P#x Ott Jircipc;rE? tnt,ttitiiith �i ���# ��oivrr �'�;�;;�('� �#s.�rinerttton ti���t@'�`�'►.�C''�'.t1`t���:: o x tiul Othm i ba 6( f +Eft C3oUie$x►aid tA::tit'146 'West aaok' �"&t'.ivr4R property,'.to North $� 'its;>�{it�'�tl< `All►C .dip frt►f�3a�% tti� fi�'da<fli !c� Off' tYi1f�} .t,��lt�,�:7i)ti .w)t fit �ramp-ts>�tct tltrcglt si$txatiion [�t�lov►t fir safet�irnin,� m+t�emeri�c 2. `1`o nla ittttizi °the fittaare tbOity of Hattser NIay, potential connections sllcirl7d lsi: mar»;inc:ci tl«t Houser �1U` preen 1'arlt Avenue and l son WAv can function as a froutttge 04d. : ilar(y, North Renton 1-405 Env ronrn0i tt Assessment shoiilci OX Fi1ifrl tq for S�ite�ct Boulevard jot to have a more direct link to 1-405. 4. The fork Avenue Interchange northbound exit ramp should he loented to allow cnoijB room For an eastbound to northbound loop ramp. City of Kenton forecasts indicate that this hoop rannp would he necessary even sander baseline land use conditions. 5. FWlier NE 44'h Street interchange designs showed an eaAbound to northbound loop ramp. T)e; northbound exit ramp should be located far enough oast to allow room' for this potential loop ramp. it tPilr Sys'�rRP Trons�rk-euinn P'.uaing R Pa�t.mim'sugtTR? Ifr 'f`;:ucp..rtuiinn Planning Pnnjner.$1L'5i5M' IgOtt� 8,rurc.0 ArmpnFA G+y fpenrwts+N,dtit'm�.1 1-405 North Rcmnri Pn)je:cl October ? 7. 2003 Faee 10 Prrvious Meetings Thc: mecting rr:cords from these two previous meetings accurately reflect comments by the City regarding the Ncrih Renton Fnvironmontal Amvssuient: • Meet t txorO, Agunc.y S(;oping Meeting, September 17, 2003 N Mud ing City of Renton Meeting, October 14, 200 City Reviewers: Staff inuolve d. in reviewing #4osubject document are: Flick Afzali, Fturtiii?hg Od Progrmm ing Manager Sh3iwntt.Mulhall Idea elr pmont Maiia er Ron Straka, Surrne' tit rI.,Ttilidy SEr)crvisor Abdoiil Gafour Wtt± z %itllit . rigu t ;S;ypc i�ar Leslie f3et146, F*V1.0 04 $I'totild you have. airy questions or G is,`ple�t :;aotttatt Nick Afzal , the City's paint of cootnt~t'fewthe 4405 pre ct, at. (42s) 430-7245; -�meAf tart ��vit�t;itxJtachment.,)s Alex Metsch Deaths Culp LnIie'&Alatzh Stands NOW. Nick AizO Rim SITAR Abdoul 43' Shawna Muiliall File "IbRk SWURY.Trvs rAAIK* "Y ror u fi.I4�o�rnnmlagklYW�sp-7rarsryw�,x..cn ybN�giwtis41�i5IDU71-145L� Aenuxi•N Rmlw CA C��y Gsr.�mcnts uw.'.vsr Memorandum of Understanding Establishing a Cooperative Relationship Between The City Of Renton and The Washington State Department of Transportation for the I-405 Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects Record of Internal City Comments/ Response Comment 1: >>> Shawna Mulhall 1/21/2004 10:58:44 AM >>> The MOU, on page 3, states that 44th is being reconstructed to accomodate mainline widening and future area improvements. I think we might want some caveat language in here as I think some additional improvements to 44th would be required if Port Quendall were built. It is my understanding that the 44th design could be modified to accomodate that level of growth, but it is not being built for that level of growth. Consequently, I am not sure the language in the MOU is quite right. Also, I have a slew of questions about the Talbot options. I've colored all my options in bright, green, yellow and pink, for local access, mainline and HOV lanes. It's a befuddling array of options. Do I recall correctly that we would meet on this, or should I try and put all of my befuddlement into an email? Response to Comment 1: Since this MOU concerns the Nickel Projects and the Implementation Plan, the detailed description of the I-405 Master Plan is moved to Attachment A. The description of the Implementation Plan has been revised to read like the description on WSDOT's project website, which only describes lane capacity improvements without specifics. A statement is added — "Interchange and ramp design specifics will continue to be refined through the design process, traffic analysis and development of funding packages." Comment 2: >>> Sandra Meyer 1/20/2004 10:27:32 AM >>> We may want to consider having these other City interests (in addition to what was expressed through the Council) also acknowledged in the MOU .... a section on land use changes and resulting needs under different years in the North Renton area. What do you think? Gregg suggested that we should draft the MOU the best we could and have a matrix of comments/requests and which suggestions were or were not incorporated. That information would go to Alex, Jay, Gregg who would either concur with the document as modified or add/delete portions, concurrence points or the final summary of official approvals. I gave copies of this to Keith, but these concerns did not mention the North Boeing area and I don't know how to incorporate it. I think City interests and decision points/expectations should be acknowledged in the document sent to Jay, Gregg and Alex.. After all, we are advocating for our City and acknowledging our concerns up front in the MOU should be there. Somewhere the document should state that the benefits of the improvements must be demonstrated to the City, could be crafted into the document, but it doesn't seem as if it would be that difficult. Response to Comment 2: 3/25/2004 Page 1 of 5 City concerns have been added to the MOU, by including the City's Business Plan, City comments made as part of the EIS concurrence points, and reference to City comments made as part of the North Renton EA process. Acknowledgement of potential North Renton land use changes is inferred by stating "interchange and ramp design specific will continue to be refined through ... traffic analysis..." Principle 5A states that this project will provide benefit to the City and its constituents. Thus, by entering this MOU, the City is stating that this project's improvements are a benefit. Comment 3: >>> Shawna Mulhall 01/19/04 04:31PM >>> Just a reminder that the Boeing baseline (i.e., no redevelopment) forecasts showed a need for the diamond interchange and an additional loop ramp. Again, this is without any redevelopment. I have mentioned this several times, but it doesn't seem to stick. I do not know how you want to resolve this. Response to Comment 3: The description of the Implementation Plan has been revised to read like the description on WSDOT's project website. A statement is added — "Interchange and ramp design specifics will continue to be refined through the design process, traffic analysis and development of funding packages." Comment 4: >>> Sandra Meyer 1/16/2004 12:37:20 PM >>> I mentioned the MOU to Gregg. He has a copy. He would prefer that all requests be relayed to he and the other Administrators along with the recommended MOU and whether or not requests were added. Hopefully we are modifying some of this and not just word smithing it. My only comments which may be of relevance are: 1) I'm not sure why we would have to mention the interim set of improvements to I-405 at the SR167/I-405 Interchange (not the nickel because we have to mention those improvements), but the RTID funded. We don't know what the RTID will include yet.. We all agree on the "Vision", but the interim solution isn't funded yet (assuming the northbound/south bound freeway to freeway connection was included in the adopted program), we are short $200 million. 2) It might be helpful to refer to what and when the City of Renton officially adopted guiding principals outlined in the concurrence points. there were several Council adopted "must dos": 9/15/2000 letter from Mayor and 9/11/04 COW Committee report as example.. A. The City of Renton wants to make sure that accessibility of neighborhoods and communities to I-405 is emphasized in all options ....... (more in the letter/report). B.Portions of the I-405 corridor pass through Renton's sole source drinking water aquifer. Sensitivity of the aquifer to possible contamination must be considered in all options. C. In order to minimize the impacts on Renton neighborhoods, improvements to I-405 should be within existing right of way. D. Impacts on neighborhoods should be minimized/mitigated. Avoid anymore "takes" to Renton Hill. E. Any final option (preferred) needs to adequately address the SR167/I-405 interchange situation. 3/25/2004 Page 2 of 5 F.The City may desire to limit arterial improvements along DuVall Avenue/Jones Road and 140th to five lanes. 3.Describe the structure that the City will be using to solve and elevate issues (Committees, functions and decision process). Response to Comment 4: The purpose of this MOU is stated as "to establish working principles by and between COR and WSDOT to facilitate the design, construction, and operation of capital projects of those portions of the Nickel and Implementation Plan that reside within the COR." Therefore, the Implementation Plan (the "interim set") needs to be mentioned. However, the description of the Implementation Plan has been revised to read like the description on WSDOT's project website. A statement is added — "Interchange and ramp design specifics will continue to be refined through the design process, traffic analysis and development of funding packages." The comments from the City as part of the EIS concurrence points have been added to the MOU. The structure is described under the section titled "Structure". Comment 5: >>> Abdoul Gafour 1/14/2004 12:54:28 PM >>> Nick: For your information only, attached is a draft preliminary list of issues that I came up with. Please do not forward this to WSDOT until we get Gregg and Lys' concurrence. Abdoul (x7210) 1/14/04-1:00 pm PRELIMINARY ISSUES TO BE INCLUDED IN MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH WSDOT FOR I-405 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS WSDOT shall agree to: 1- Fund a study to determine the best technology or technologies (e.g., groundwater monitoring wells and monitoring, soil vapor monitoring wells and monitoring, etc.) and number and locations of detection facilities to provide early detection of hazardous chemical spills from the construction of the I-405 improvements within the City of Renton's well fields and Aquifer Protection Area. 2- Fund the design, construction and construction inspection of the detection facilities recommended by the study. 3- Fund the sampling and testing at the detection facilities recommended by the study for the duration of the construction of the improvements and for the duration recommended by the study. 4- Fund at take immediate action to investigate cause of contamination if results of analyses are above detection limits. 5. -Fund all cleanup of contamination and subsequent monitoring. 6. -All study, design, construction inspection, sampling, testing, monitoring for contamination clean and remediation shall be conducted by an independent hydrogeologic consultant selected mutually by WSDOT and the City of Renton at WSDOT's sole cost and expense. 7. Hold harmless and insurance agreement 8. Dispute resolution and remedies 9. Emergency response plan 10. Environmental protection plan including on -site, full-time, independent environmental inspector/coordinator mutually selected by the City and WSDOT 11. Recovery of costs for response and clean up of contamination 12.- Fund all cost associated with the replacement or relocation of all City's production wells, pump stations and water treatment facilities impacted by I-405 improvements, including feasibility study and investigation, acquisition of real property, securing of all state and federal environmental and regulatory permits. 3/25/2004 Page 3 of 5 >>> Nick Afzali 01/14/04 12:39PM >>> Lys and Abdoul, Thanks a bunch for your comments. I will develop the language to be incorporated into the MOU. I will forward the draft language to you for your review as well. Please let me know if you have any questions. >>> Lys Hornsby 01/14/04 08:49AM >>> Also, Nick: Since Renton's aquifer is a sole source aquifer, there are certain protections that we have if federal funding is used on a project. The USEPA (and Renton) must approve an environmental protection plan to protect the aquifer. We want to make a very strong statement with this tool! The fact that we are working in a sole source aquifer should be emphasized in the MOU and the requirement for an independent environmental coordinator and plan should be listed as a minimum requirement. We did a very similar thing when the s-curves were taken out. Response to Comment 5: The comments from the City as part of the EIS concurrence points have been added to the MOU. These comments note the sensitivity of the City's aquifer. Also, reference is made to City comments made as part of the North Renton EA process. These comments are detailed with regards to protection of the sole source aquifer. Comment 6: Comment made during City Design Team meetings: clarify "coordination" Response to Comment 6: The following was added to the Funding section — "WSDOT and the COR will, on a case -by -case basis, negotiate costs associated with the need for Consultants to assist with COR coordination, review, and comments." Comment 7: Comment made during City Design Team meetings: If outside consultants are needed by the City to review WSDOT design, we would like WSDOT to fund them. Response to Comment 7: The following was added to the Funding section — "WSDOT and the COR will, on a case -by -case basis, negotiate costs associated with the need for Consultants to assist with COR coordination, review, and comments." Comment 8: >>> Abdoul Gafour 2/18/2004 12:07:38 PM >>> Nick: 3/25/2004 Page 4 of 5 I have drafted the following language that I would to see us include in the MOU so that WSDOT understands and acknowledges our concerns on the impacts to the City's wells from the I-405 project. Please let me know what you think. Thank you. Future Understanding and Agreements The City of Renton owns, operates and maintains an extensive water system, including six groundwater wells, 4 pump stations, 2 water treatment facilities, and water transmission pipelines in the vicinity of the I-405 and the Cedar River in Renton. The City of Renton relies solely on groundwater for its water supply. Groundwater is drawn from the Cedar River Valley aquifer which has been designated a sole source aquifer by the U.S. EPA. It is understood that the I-405 project will impact the City's drinking water supply and water facilities and the project may require the relocation and replacement of existing City's wells and water facilities. It is understood that WSDOT will agree to replace and to mitigate all impacts to the City's water wells and facilities resulting from by the I-405 project. Response to Comment 8: The comments from the City as part of the EIS concurrence points have been added to the MOU. These comments note the sensitivity of the City's aquifer. Also, reference is made to City comments made as part of the North Renton EA process. These comments are detailed with regards to protection of the sole source aquifer. 3/25/2004 Page 5 of 5 Ronald Straka - Page 1 From: "David Masters" <DMasters@HNTB.com> To: <rstraka@ci. renton.wa. us> Date: 04/09/2004 1:36:34 PM You are cordially invited to participate in a Value/Engineering Study which will focus on the stormwater design for two projects in the 1-405 Corridor. The V/E study will be examining opportunities to improve the current stormwater design for the North Renton road section (from the Cedar River to 1-90) and the Kirkland road section (from SR 520 to SR 522). The WE study will bring together a panel of stormwater and low impact development experts from around the region to examine the current design and figure out ways to improve the current designs to make them more efficient, produce a greater range of environmental benefits, make them easier to maintain, or to reduce their overall cost. To do this, the technical team needs a firm grounding in the goals and criteria that help them recognize what a successful "improvement" would be. We would appreciate your participation in two meetings to help us accomplish this. The first meeting is focused on identifying the interests of potentially impacted stakeholders along the roadway. This is a facilitated exercise that lasts about an hour, and is scheduled to run from 11-12 on Ap 15th. During the morning of the 15th, our WE panel will be receiving a briefing on the current status of the 1-405 projects and the stormwater design. You would be welcome to attend this briefing also, if you were interested. We would also welcome your attendance at the reporting session, where our panel of experts gives us a briefing on their suggestions for improving the project design. This session is scheduled for 1-3 on Ap 22nd. Both sessions will be held in the Rainier Conference Room at the 1-405 offices: 600 108th Ave NE, Suite 405 Bellevue 425-456-8500 Please let me know if you have any questions. David Masters 1-405 Water Resources Lead This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. How does the 1-405 Implementation Plan complement ongoing Metro and Sound Transit Improvements along the Corridor? The 1-405 Program is about improving people's ability to get from place to place. More than 150 different projects —including general purpose, freight, and high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane improvements, new Park and Ride lots, and additional van and buses will accommodate users' choices, regardless of their preferred mode. HOV Lane Improvements With 60 miles of HOV lanes already in use, 1-405 offers carpools, vanpools and transit buses a less congested option northbound and southbound the entire length of the corridor. During peak periods, HOV lanes carry up to half the people on 1-405. The Implementation Plan brings new access ramps to those HOV lanes, so travelers don't have to weave through lanes of traffic to exit the highway. Improvements: a new freeway to freeway HOV ramp to connect the SR 167 HOV lane to the north on 1-405, In -line transit stations at 112th Ave. SE in Bellevue, NE 85th St. in Kirkland and Brickyard near Bothell. Sound Transit has several Direct Access projects funded in the 1-405 corridor, including the Totem Lake Freeway Station at NE 128th St., Bellevue at NE 6th St. and N 8th St. near Renton/Boeing. Park and Ride Capacity Increases Along 1-405, there are nine Park and Ride lots, and many other lots that are accessible to the corridor. The 1-405 Implementation Plan provides for 2,350 additional Park and Ride spaces to encourage transit and carpool riders. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Carpools, vanpools, commute trip reduction, telecommuting, outreach programs, leased Park and Ride spaces —all of these transportation enhancements are encompassed in Washington State's TDM program — one of the strongest in the U.S. In fact, 80% of HOV lane users on 1-405 are carpools and vanpools. Transit Improvements A number of transit improvements will take shape in the Implementation Plan — these include transit stations and coaches that will complement current services as well as develop the BRT line. Lynnwood Transit Center 000-91, Canyon Park Station 0 BRT Stations IUW Bothell Campus Future Expansion Brickyard Station * Transit Centers Funded by Sound Transit Totem Lake Station Kirkland NE 85th Station Bellevue Downtown Station Newport Hills Station Port Quendall Station I Renton Boeing Station SeaTac Airport Sta nRenton Downtown Station 0— now ,Tukwila Urban Center Commuter. Rail Station, Improvements planned for the Implementation Plan phase of 1-405, are to develop a new BRT line that will eventually run in the HOV lanes along the entire length of I-405. Connections to other transit routes will occur at stations along the corridor, most of which will allow passengers to get on and off without the BRT coach ever leaving the freeway. 52 FS Canyon Park —— — — — lOHO_I NN— KING COUNI 22 Z NE,6mhsl &kkrard Totem lake TC NE 1 JZN sr. NE ]28fn St NE ll6thi NE 12dM�, IQddand * 85M 56eet ^, „__ NE 85M St NE Ift St I) Ovedake TC szo � Q &I vu) SE 8m St Me,c (1 Ea,tgate 1 poal Creek k, SE --- Existing HOV HOV Access Point or Improvement OTransit Center ® Flyer Stop Q New Park & Ride Lots 0,0 Existing Park & Ride Lots Renfon 518 �00 Newport Hilh N112M AreSE 167 90M SI. N WSDOT, Sound Transit, King County Metro and Community Transit are working on integrated transit improvement projects up and down 1-405. These projects are designed to work together enhancing 1-405 as a multimodal corridor. Adw �Washington State j Department of Transportation What Environmental Benefits will 1-405 Improvements Provide? Engineered Flow Control Example: stormwater detention pond Restoring Natural Flow Control Example: wetlands restoration Watershed -Based Planning Building new lanes on 1-405 will create additional surface water runoff that must be captured and cleaned. In the past, stormwater detention ponds, such as the one pictured on the left, have been used. Stormwater detention ponds capture and store water runoff before it reaches a stream system. While methods like this manage water quality and quantity, they are expensive to build, focus on minimizing negative impacts, and provide only the minimal required benefits. A better potential solution is to create a wetlands restoration site, pictured to the right. Capturing surface water upstream from the highway and detaining it in a more natural environment focuses on maximizing positive impacts to the watershed and can achieve additional environmental benefits at the same or less cost. WSDOT is employing this new approach on a variety of highway projects throughout the State. Benefits: • Targets environmental improvement investments to those areas that will have the greatest long-term environmental benefit (vs. providing short-term spot treatments) • Addresses how the watershed is functioning as a whole, rather than looking solely at the impact site and making minor improvements • Provides opportunities to restore natural processes, making the watershed more biologically productive and reducing long-term maintenance costs around streams and wetlands • Uses resources more efficiently. The 1-405 project team is conducting cost - benefit analyses on conventional vs. alternative mitigation options • Costs less in challenging topography, such as steep slopes, high groundwater or wetlands WSDOT is currently working on project -level environmental assessments to ensure that the project will avoid or compensate for environmental impacts. If you'd like to learn more, or be part of this process, please consider attending a scoping meeting in your area (www.wsdot.wa.gov/projects/1-405). New Methods New watershed characterization methods integrate the mitigation of wetland, riparian, floodplain, and stormwater impacts by restoring the landscapes capacity to provide necessary functions, while increasing the environmental benefits. Early Environmental Investments As part of WSDOT's environmental commitment, the environmental team continues to investigate opportunities for early environmental investments along the corridor. The team is currently working with jurisdictions to identify sites that have potential for early development of mitigation projects that will offer the most environmental benefit for the dollar. Washington State Department of Transportation 0 to O CD- V) <v O LO Q 0 a) o m 0 N 00 0 < 00 C/) , rn = o Q 0 �2 �: 0 U ai N m m Leo C/) .� O O O Q -Q 0 Q U j p on � O E }' CU -0 00 Y i� LO N a) cn -0U N 64 Y U a) O > a) a) n > _ UO a) > LO V) E O a) a)E - 0 E <n a) � Ow b.0 O_ N ) Ln ° bA CO a) m _0 a) C O i E c C �• m Q U O -O a) •d m O 1C -O U C, cn Y U E > O> OQ) im a•-) m v7O- O L C) U U E a O E a) don m +o J O m 3 cv > Y O u o 0 a on a) °) zzo U o o , u> a an Ln o a) m o - 0 a) E E ai o m o +� o Q oa'n _ > E p E d N E O E m a Q i m 3 o w U 0 3 a) c>a n m a) 0 0 3 L a) v Y +_ c °c° (n o m aEi F d Q E o O+� +� U) U •E U a) a) o U a) i U 0 �A U a) a) bE0 (a O vi 0 �A a)N C O ?) m m E 0 (n LO 0+ m � _ i a) o m m a) O _0 m a) > ° E u �, FLLn o E a) a) N .� " a > > N > E a o@ bn OD Q) o O E ° = °) 0 v, m ° ° n 0 0 - n. E 0 aa) o ° o E U E O E a) � C c� m o > o O �' m a) m cn + �' o a c .� a w U a) � E ° o' U w U C:) U o ° i— E .N to (n E C a) a) L a) U > E Q J- - m m m m E m Laa .; •� N ` w O O1 •�. ,140 O n aco o <n .p ai a o o ai o m o o n o .,o a� c a� � �° � 2 ao m Q _ w cz�, cz c o 0 o n o O O h a a m •CL V N E r- O L W O S at «w V) O 0 d eE rW M0 m 30 f; � 0 � r• Y 8 s It i0 m'__ :� p■p q idLU• o2 0 16 C 16 T WE Oi O wc� V 0 L amm 1 M > Eoil © '� z on 0 U E ° E m O 3 O -Fu _ _ � Y C +�--' a O E ° N E T `�° c a a) a) m.a 0 LO (n m ca m C w a) Coa) O d +� T, -6 O a) a) a) ECL M m LL E a) Q) a) > N .° w° m m m m o°n 0 E E -°a -0 Y vi � n V)— a) ° > E —-Fa n a) N m °' _ > U :U a) O Q O m m U) O- Q a) O V) ab a)N O Ln E 'O p O bn cu c U U w ca m E Oc U) @ L � C (�6 m m M> _ E E E a) C) Q)) U on � - E o �. ° E o +� E E U ° O p D E m U. aa) O_ E- E O= } > (n c> O0 O O_ E On O - 'E m 0) N •p +� OD O m lm E OU > C a) 70 >, 4) _ a)� C ° p O_ O > N a) m U_ n a) W U Q a) @ 3 EE a) Ln m Z E i L7 p N •N N E CD a) U E C O C E m m �, N d > m Q) i'' N i O 41 ++ E m •� 4] Q ° a) +. E N + M m Q U 7 � 3 � m o — E � E a) � � � � E � � p m � a) U a) + •3 Z -0 C Q U c >, a) N a) � U aa) an o a) .° o c O 0 0 c Ln O E m Ln o o o aa)) E E a (n ° +� Ln a) °- O c v) E a) a) Q O It _0 > N U o a) Q a E v) E a 0 U cn Q .3 O i o X a) ain E a) m U LO m e v do 0 E a) D L) •a) p i O U n O � o 2 orn E E � O m U U�� •� � m L j co a '� a) E O >� a) E o .E o U00N Q) m O i E O Q to L 0 O E C L M 0 co U o� Q � o 0 o6 m LO -° U c co N -° L� -O — Ln '° O L 0 N m C C m C CD 7 cn O C m N o °— = a) a) U Q) +-' C cn o o 0 b0 a) = +' a) O m E W m m m E C c o o ti c a--' - U E a) w a) E c w U L E� a)) a�i m a� s c L m cNa VU) d si H 72 E O O Q C (Nd m rn E .:a ma)C-0 E E E n .0 o CD- .o o /, .S o 0 > 0 a) d E- o` L' c O Q E _° m E Q O E m c N C (Q E Q Q a) E O U m a) O � E E m c o E o 3 .3 � m o m c� a O p •C E � d •C N a) o � Ef m m m +J = E c � oc r- ew c N U 0 p`n aa) O E � E rr o a O E c� a CD- _ 3 C O C C y -c - c E `� p __0 > W a om av 5 _ U C)` V N p N a) E O a) m OO L C V +•+ L U) E a) CD U) O Ln E a— a) -O E > .m E +� a) a) cv m H M Z c Ua) p o f UO o � o_ o� ci o m E o O E V) 0 O m Oclq a? y I- U O m Q) I- O QL 0. E v c�i - F= o 0 CUD coo C O O 0 a+ N N N d d ^ T T N CUD c Q c m O U N tw c E y --� N O c� m w> CL �_ 1 6 m =J L�LA C Q Q2 H �O = Q,) C2 � O N U W LL M m Ez a o n . v Q) c: 0 o CZ 0 Co 3 � h o � '1 O 4 a o Oq n N C0 � a O� E m O >r � >r Cz 0 O � � CZI d. 0 � M Z }�■ �� , o _ o o 00 o N c 00 oe00 Ln n rn 3 �rzCi ,� _ o o a OO h M m a O •�? U 2CISUS N �C53 Q�8 C--)m r 0 C n C 6 ' zz cu `. o ti c o C--) 00 c _00 cD C o c � cp cc wit C Z3 ooa Z c y C CD -Im m � d v � n O 0 a O O W m cn n v O Co Co 0- D D — D EA C, _ O Q v O 00 o c0 Cl O Q U( Q E3 C (O� O D (� 0 9 O cn �' 5 (D C) N 3 C r-r < 1 Q N Q Ln 00 r-r r-r 5 COD v < O D v � rr Cl) 00 �' O COD H (n (D = n rNr O C) (D D m ,--r ZJ O (D N CD O n 3 S O ,-r (D oo — CD p� O � cn 3= O ~T 00 zi v 0° O O O CD m o =' v D- O 0 Q Q i (D O D (/� —' v 0 Ul N (<D C -0 D_ a)CD v O N l0 n v N� O O CS (� -O D- 0 o N 0 0 c o (n N r-r �- Cn m (7 Up 3 C 0 0Q D O O r D = =t O D O � v � ti z n + +ET E;l 9 _ r o v N>cc Ct) n C o O H y d ow o c ^� 4c O a o o Z a o Zr �. � o- n cep ? O cD cD Q= o O `� o — O O ois.:O_ a coi> p O Q `. O y cD 1l Q cD Z' .-. O .-�. -nzz m �. y O cD .vi ooQ_ `. y cD p" O cp O = 3 O� o o c� zr g°o Q Al. o Q y c� o o0 Q � C) ? O �' cb y cD o I ? COu o O m n (n ti H cu D4 c� �' N �- n >v o = � cOn p j o o ss — cU o o o o- a �~ CZ3 �' `� Q ti O' W N c O Q n -n CT -U cs m (T C� N W -O — o (� D- cn < CT 0 O CD n fl 0r 0 C7 - D n (D v v s= r r = < co r. Q v m D_ Q o 0* F ° cCDn v, con °' ° (D 0 (D n (n O O �. COD (7 CD 0 (D �' r-� Q) (D coU D ( — (IQ 00 a O n v D_ ~CD n N O co ' O O rt 3 U, < v N O v= O (D CD Q v _ v D 7 r�r 0'q (D CD ,--r (D 7 �' O cn Q Q Q O O _0 — N O � O 0- (TDo %� Q CT (D D_ v (D < fll O O O (n — (D O Q r-r v T < r=r i (On r r fll r�-r COD (D (D O (D -t D f1 � 00 r-r CD O D fl) O cn ,--r 0 r-r D \ v CD O (OD 3 D_ CT I 7 N N m a coNp Q D -0 �. CD.- D D' CD W (n CD r-r 7 CD E CD- (n O (�D 0 v :n O C2. 6 n' o c0 r0-r v D r-r -0 D D 7 D D- 3 D' 0 �- x CD :j v D = (D < (n G D (D N _ _OO CAD CD (D .D ;:� v D CD =3 D- O _ c) fl, CD c� � x o. (D h m -0 n O cn p N v 0 O Q r* w 3 C)O �' •--r CD D C.11 O Dr c =5 v a 0 to CAD -0_ UQ =i, 0-CD- D CD O O _0 to < O q (D D cn (D zT CD (n w c� `Ip = o cl rn o c0 c) C0 0 0 -1 o 5C, oo o0 �. Cb Cb 1CD C1 1 y y Z e a_ Cb a y o C, CD a (7b Q _Q � O (D v 0 Z7 0 D (D 0 < (D O C-) 3 -0 x 0 (D(� OL)_ D_ � Q 0 o < m c 00 CD C � W O E3 (D CD CD _0 (n 0 Cl ,00-r 0 O T. D- O' co CD (D —_ 0— 3 D_ (D < — W O (D 'n n (D D fl1 D (n D O< N' 0 C -0 v '� O Z7 0p -0 O N 5' fZ D Q y W COD D — D- _0 '+ D `G CD r-r O O (� v 0 0 (n 0 D (n 0 r ? D � � (n _0 CD v CD D r r CD �. co D L CD Q 0 -0 0 0 N v C)m Cn (n D m 0 N O - m O cn o + lb QI = CZ,Q O O � -Z ? ti O Q � p cD C c5 o � _' � v o c o o 00 c� p. = ti' cnu k Q O_- E; cb O O) � y cD ocu° � `. °a o Co V FD• n H