The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSWP273170(26)Y O1p � Corridor Program Congestion Relief S Bus Rapid Transit Projects Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site S Wetland Delineation Report FIR41po . i1S•j�. II eO � <� R.. �L-.jf May 2005 Washington State WIF Department of Transportation Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects so Table of Contents INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. I What is the I-405 Corridor Program?...............................................................................I Whatis EEI?.....................................................................................................................I How does this report support EEI?..................................................................................I Where is the EEI Mitigation Site located?....................................................................... I How was the wetland study for EEI conducted?..............................................................2 RESULTS...........................................................................................................................5 UNITA................................................................................................................................5 UNITB................................................................................................................................8 UNITC..............................................................................................................................12 UNITD..............................................................................................................................15 UNITE..............................................................................................................................17 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................18 APPENDIX A - WETLAND DELINEATION METHODS ..................................... A-1 APPENDIX B - WETLAND DATA SHEETS............................................................B-1 APPENDIX C - WETLAND PHOTOGRAPHS........................................................ C-1 APPENDIX D - WETLAND SURVEY MAPS.......................................................... D-1 List of Tables TABLE 1. CRITERIA FOR WETLAND RATING CATEGORIES ..........................4 TABLE 2. WETLAND SIZE, RATING, AND CLASSIFICATION FOR WETLANDS IN THE SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND MITIGATION BANK..................................................................................................................................5 TABLE A-1. DEFINITIONS OF WETLAND PLANT INDICATOR CATEGORIES USED TO DETERMINE THE PRESENCE OF HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION............................................................................................................. A-1 Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report Aft T o.Parl nn at to .nt ofT.neport.tbn May 2005 i Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects List of Figures FIGURE 1 LOCATION OF MITIGATION SITES.......................................................3 FIGURE 2 UNIT A WETLAND DELINEATION.........................................................7 FIGURE 3 UNIT B WETLAND DELINEATION.........................................................9 FIGURE 4 UNIT C WETLAND DELINEATION.......................................................13 FIGURE 5 UNIT D WETLAND DELINEATION.......................................................16 Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report T ; , „„;�T n,�.t.tbn May 2005 Introduction What is the I-405 Corridor Program? The I405 Corridor, from I-5 in Tukwila to I-5 in Lynnwood, needs improvement to relieve current and future traffic congestion. The I-405 Corridor Program is a set of improvements to the I-405 Corridor designed to address congestion on this important arterial. The proposed improvements will result in some environmental impacts, some of which will be addressed through a mitigation program called Early Environmental Investment (EEI). What is EEI? Early Environmental Investment develops mitigation in advance of project impacts. The EEI process will identify, rank, select, design, and permit environmental investment for improving aquatic resources, fish habitat, wetlands, water quantity, and floodplains. This advance selection and creation of mitigation will allow the resources longer to mature before actual project impacts are incurred, reducing the length of time that resource functions are affected. EEI is a cooperative effort, requiring information sharing and partnering among agencies with an interest in the 1-405 study area. How does this report support EEI? This report is an investigation of one mitigation site selected under the EEI process. The report provides detailed baseline wetland information on the proposed Springbrook mitigation site. A separate mitigation report will be prepared to discuss details of the proposed mitigation activities at this site. Where is the EEI Mitigation Site located? The Proposed Springbrook Mitigation Site consists of five units (A through E, See Figure 1). All five units are within the City of Renton, Washington: Unit A is located southwest of the intersection of SW 27th Street and Lind Avenue SW. It extends approximately 1,200 feet south from the intersection, and approximately 900 feet west to Springbrook Creek. Unit A is in Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East (Willamette Meridian). Unit B is located southeast of the intersection of SW 27th Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW (Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East). It extends approximately 1,200 feet south from the intersection, and approximately 1,200 feet east to Springbrook Creek. Unit C is located west of Oakesdale Avenue SW, between SW 27th Street and SW 340, Street (Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East). It extends west from Oakesdale Avenue SW to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad right-of-way. Unit D is located north of SW 43`d Street, immediately east of the BNSF right-of-way (Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East). It extends approximately 1,300 feet north of SW 43`a Street, and approximately 350 feet east of the BNSF right-of-way. Unit E is a triangular parcel located east of Oakesdale Avenue SW, approximately 400 feet south of SW 34th Avenue (Section 25, Township 23North, Range 4 East). Springbrook Creek forms the southeast boundary of Unit E. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report Tat May 2005 How was the wetland study for EEI conducted? The investigation included two steps. The first step was a review of existing documents such as soil surveys, aerial photographs, and other available documents. The second step was the field investigation, delineation, and classification of the wetlands observed on the units. Step 1: Review of Existing Information Existing documents that were reviewed for this study included but were not limited to: • Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington (Snyder et al. 1973) • Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Prospectus (Washington State Department of Transportation 2004) • National Wetland Inventory Web site (http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/wtlnds/launch.html) (USFWS 2004) These documents provide background information on the soils, hydrology, topography, land use, wetlands, streams, and wildlife habitat in the site vicinity. Step 2: Field Investigation Wetland delineations were made using the methods described in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Washington State Department of Ecology [Ecology] 1997) and the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1987). Areas were identified as wetlands if they displayed the necessary soils, plants, and hydrologic conditions. A detailed description of the field methods used in this study is provided in Appendix A of this report, and the wetland delineation data sheets are presented in Appendix B. Delineated wetlands were classified according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al. 1979). The City of Renton wetland rating system (Renton Municipal Code Title 4, Chapter 3, Section 4.3.050) was used to rate wetlands. Table 1 summarizes the wetland rating criteria utilized. A detailed analysis of wetland functions is not included in this report, but has been provided to regulatory agencies under separate cover (Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Information Packet, [WSDOT 2004]). Updated information will be included in the wetland mitigation report to be prepared in 2005. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report 7 WanStment of T;,,, .,�� May 2005 2 FIGURE 1 Location of Mitigation Sites Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report I February 2005 Table 1. Criteria for Wetland Rating Categories Category City of Renton Category I Category 1 wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) The presence of species listed by federal or state government as endangered or threatened, or the presence of essential habitat for those species; and/or (b) Wetlands having forty percent (40%) to sixty percent (60%) permanent open water (in dispersed patches or otherwise) with two (2) or more vegetation classes; and/or (c) Wetlands equal to or greater than ten (10) acres in size and having three (3) or more vegetation classes, one of which is open water; and/or (d) The presence of plant associations of infrequent occurrence; or at the geographic limits of their occurrence; and/or (e) Wetlands assigned the Unique/Outstanding #1 rating in the current King County Wetlands Inventory 1991 or as thereafter amended. Category II Category 2 wetlands are wetlands greater than two thousand two hundred (2,200) square feet which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) Wetlands greater than two thousand two hundred (2,200) square feet that are not Category 1 or 3 wetlands; and/or (b) Wetlands that have heron rookeries or raptor nesting trees, but are not Category 1 wetlands; and/or (c) Wetlands of any size located at the headwaters of a watercourse, but are not Category 1 wetlands; and/or (d) Wetlands assigned the Significant #2 rating in the current King County Wetlands Inventory 1991 or as thereafter amended; and/or (e) Wetlands having minimum existing evidence of human -related physical alteration such as diking, ditching, or channelization. Category III Category 3 wetlands are wetlands greater than five thousand (5,000) square feet which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) Wetlands that are severely disturbed. Severely disturbed wetlands are wetlands which meet the following criteria: • Are characterized by hydrologic isolation, human -related hydrologic alterations such as diking, ditching, channelization and/or outlet modification; and • Have soils alterations such as the presence of fill, soil removal, and/or compaction of soils; and • May have altered vegetation. (b) Wetlands that are newly emerging. Newly emerging wetlands are: • Wetlands occurring on top of fill materials; and • Characterized by emergent vegetation, low plant species richness, and used minimally by wildlife. These wetlands are generally found in the areas such as the Green River Valley and Black River Drainage Basin. (c) All other wetlands not classified as Category 1 or 2 such as smaller, high quality wetlands. a City of Renton (Renton Municipal Code Title 4, Chapter 3, 43.050). Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report T aP;,«T naportatlon May 2005 4 Results The initial wetland delineation was performed in October and November 2004. Eight wetlands were located in four (Units A, B, C, and D) of the five units. No wetlands were identified in Unit E. Wetland delineation data sheets are provided in Appendix B, and site photographs are in Appendix C. Table 2 summarizes the size, rating and classification of wetlands found within the study area, and Figures 2 through 5 show the wetland boundaries and data plot locations. Note that the second column of Table 2 shows the area of the delineated portion of the wetland (i.e., the portion on the parcel), followed by the estimated overall wetland size in parenthesis. Table 2. Wetland Size, Rating, and Classification for Wetlands in the Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Site Wetland Delineated Wetland RatinII USFWS Classification` area in acres City of Renton (overall wetland sizes) Unit A A-1 22.9 3 Forested, Scrub/shrub, Emergent (24) Unit B B-1 22.3 3 Forested, Emergent (22.3) B-2 10.0 3 Forested, Emergent (10.0) B-3 0.3 3 Forested, Emergent (0.3) Unit C C-1 21.2 2 Forested, Scrub/shrub (33.9) C-2 5.8 3 Forested, Emergent (48.5) C-3 0.9 3 Forested (48.5) Unit D D-1 5.6 2 Forested, Scrub/shrub, Emergent (6.7) a Overall wetlands size is estimated based on aerial photograph interpretation. Area of delineated portions of the wetlands is based on instrument survey (Huitt Zollars, 2004-2005). Wetland ratings are based on Renton Municipal Code, Title 4 Chapter 3. All ratings shown in this table are preliminary and have not been reviewed by the City of Renton or other regulatory agencies. ` Cowardin et al. (1979). All wetlands are palustrine. Wetlands C-1, C-2, and C-3 are part of the same wetland complex. Offsite wetlands to the north were calculated with Wetland C-1, and those to the south of the property were calculated with C-2/C-3. Unit A Field investigations were performed by project biologists at Unit A on October 20, 2004, and additional data were collected on October 21 and 28, 2004. One wetland (A-1) was delineated within the unit. A summary of the findings at Unit A are presented below. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report 7 at May 2005 5 Wetland A-1 Palustrine forested, scrub/shrub, and emergent Category 3 22.9 acres in Unit A/24 acres overall Wetland A-1 is riverine wetland located in a low lying area between adjacent roads, developed areas elevated by fill material, and the maintained berm along Springbrook Creek. Wetland A-1 is approximately 24 acres in size, and includes palustrine forested, scrub/shrub, and emergent communities (Cowardin et al. 1979). The forested areas comprise a fringe along the northern, southern, and western edges of Wetland A-1, although portions of the forested component extend into the middle of the unit. The scrub/shrub communities occur as smaller (approximately 0.2 to 1.5 acre) areas scattered throughout the forested and emergent communities. The emergent community covers the eastern '/2 of Unit A. Vegetation in the forested areas includes red alder (Alnus rubra) and black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera) in the canopy. These trees are relatively low (generally less than 75 feet tall), with diameters at breast height (dbh) up to approximately 24 inches. The understory includes Pacific willow (Salix lucida var. lasiandra) and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus). Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) is the dominant herbaceous species and occupies the emergent areas. Soils in Wetland A-1 are mapped as Snohomish silt loam, Woodinville silt loam, and Puget silty clay loam (Snyder et al. 1973). The soils observed in wetland test pits were generally very dark grayish brown (IOYR 3/2) silty clay or silty clay loam. Fine redoxymorphic features were common in most areas. Wetland A-1 is separated from Springbrook Creek by a maintained berm located approximately 20 feet above the water level. Two small ditches, referred to herein as the northern and southern ditches, traverse Wetland A-1 from east to west. The northern ditch crosses the middle of the unit beginning near Lind Avenue SW and extending to the eastern foot of the berm along Springbrook Creek. A culvert carries it under the berm. This ditch is approximately 6 feet wide and 10 inches deep, and reed canarygrass lines the channel and dominates the substrate. The southern ditch is located just north of the south property boundary. The ditch begins at a culvert under Lind Avenue SW, and flows west to Springbrook Creek, where it passes through the berm. The southern ditch is approximately 10 to 15 feet wide, and appears to consist of a series of loosely connected areas of shallow inundation. The banks are vegetated with alder, cottonwood, and willows, which provide shade and contribute to organic material. A culvert carries water from the south directly into Wetland A-1. Wetland hydrology in Wetland A-1 appears to derive from elevated groundwater from Springbrook Creek and stormwater flows entering the wetland from culverts to the east and south. Areas of saturated soils and shallow inundation were observed during the field investigations. Fill berms adjacent to the sidewalks along Lind Avenue SW and SW 27t' Street extend down to the wetland edge. These areas are dominated by dense thickets of Himalayan blackberry and likely consist of fill material placed when these roads were constructed. With the exception of a few undeveloped areas, the majority of the parcels surrounding Wetland A-1 are developed (see Figures 1 and 2). An undeveloped lot, potentially consisting of a wetland, is located north Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report 7;;p;�;M,a e,,,p„t,,,,� May 2005 6 S-. _ihth S-_t. d m D �. v �kg x 2 m N r hmhft— V C m 3� a m Ni Y O . .,e n o � s xyy' ml h ? ,*4 ml `yy r a n c c a w w_yy d o� a m Ei m 0 9 07 15 C F n Figure 2 Unit A Wetland Delineation T C Parcel 0 0 Surveyed Wetland Q Interpreted (off -site) Wetland ... �.. _ N i Data Plot y+E 9 0 100 2OPeet of SW 27th Street and east of Springbrook Creek. Due to the presence of the street, this area is not directly connected to Wetland A-1, although it likely was in the past. The parcel south of Wetland A-1 along Lind Avenue SW includes a large building and parking areas. A small stormwater treatment feature, approximately 50 feet wide, is associated with this development and is located between the parking areas and Wetland A-1. Until recently, the parcel to the southwest of Unit A contained maintained pasture grass. This pasture is currently being graded for development. The western boundary of Unit A includes the channelized portion of Springbrook Creek. A large wetland complex is located immediately west of Springbrook Creek (see Unit B description). In summary, Wetland A-1 is a large system comprised of multiple vegetation types that contribute to relatively high function. However, its buffers are narrow and disturbed, limited in size and function by surrounding land uses. Although Wetland A-1 is surrounded on three sides by development, a berm adjacent to Springbrook Creek forms the fourth side and is relatively undisturbed. Springbrook Creek provides a hydrologic connection to other habitats upstream and downstream of the site, as well as areas along the BNSF right-of-way and the Green River. Unit B Project biologists delineated three wetlands (B-1, B-2, and B-3) in Unit B on October 19, 2004. Additional data were collected on October 20, 2004. A summary of the wetland investigations is provided below. Wetland B-1 Palustrine forested and emergent Category 3 22.3 acres in Unit B/22.3 acres overall Wetland B-1 is a depressional wetland approximately 22.3 acres in size and includes palustrine forested and emergent communities (Cowardin et al. 1979). The forested areas comprise a fringe along SW 270' Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW, and also occupy the southern third of the wetland (See Figures 1 and 3). The emergent community occupies the northeastern third of the wetland. Vegetation in the forested areas includes red alder and black cottonwood in the canopy, with an understory of Pacific willow, Scouler's willow (Salix scouleriana), Himalayan blackberry, and red osier dogwood (Corpus sericea). Herbaceous species in the forested areas include bittersweet nightshade (Solanum dulcamara), scouring rush (Equisetum hymale), English ivy (Hedera helix), and hedge bindweed (Convulvulus sepium). Trees in Wetland B-1 are relatively short (the tallest are approximately 75 feet), with diameters at breast height (dbh) up to approximately 24 inches. Emergent portions of Wetland B-1 are dominated by reed canarygrass, although yellowflag iris, common cattail (Typha latifolia), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), waterpepper (Polygonum hydropiper), and mild waterpepper (Polygonum hydropiperoides var. hydropiperoides) are locally dominant. Soils in Wetland B-1 are mapped as Woodinville silt loam (Snyder et al. 1973). The observed soils were generally dark to very dark grayish brown (1 OYR 4/2 to 1 OYR 3/2) silty loam to silty clay loam. Fine redoxymorphic features were common in most of the sample plots. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report T" .��otaft May 2005 8 I e r a Ak Oakesdale Mitigation Site '*SW 2 �M, > ; 44 *Plot • �r4 1 � 4 ft�,— Ir F Plot Wetland B-1 is located in a depression bordered by SW 27th Street to the north, Oakesdale Avenue SW to the west, developed areas (fill) to the south, and the Oakesdale Avenue SW Mitigation Site to the east. Topography within the wetland is quite flat, with a few micro -depressions that trap water. Wetland B-1 is separated from Springbrook Creek by a berm (the Oakesdale Avenue Mitigation Site) and by Wetland B-2. A culvert appears to carry water into Wetland B-1 from the west under Oakesdale Avenue SW; however, no flow was observed during the field investigation and there was no evidence of a channel. Shallow areas of inundation were found along the eastern side of Wetland B-1 near the Oakesdale Avenue SW Mitigation Site. Water appears to directly enter Wetland B-1 as precipitation, and via elevated groundwater levels. In addition to Wetland B-1, two other wetlands (B-2 to the east and B-3 to the north) are located in Unit B. Two vacant parcels (a Boeing site and Unit C) are located to the west of Wetland B-1 on the opposite side of Oakesdale Avenue SW. Southwest 27"' Street is located to the north of Wetland B-1, and the properties to the north of the road are occupied by commercial buildings. A newly built strip -mall is located south of Wetland B-1. Vegetation along the road edges is dominated by domestic grasses and non-native forbs. Himalayan blackberry is prevalent along edges and in disturbed areas. Wetland B-1 is a relatively large wetland with multiple habitat types. These habitats are fragmented by roads and development, and the natural vegetation has been altered significantly. Buffers are narrow and disturbed, except on the east. Wetland B-2 Palustrine forested and emergent Category 3 10 acres in Unit B/10 acres overall Wetland B-2 is a riparian wetland 10 acres in size, and includes palustrine forested and emergent communities (Cowardin et al. 1979). The forested area dominates the majority of the wetland, and the emergent areas are located in the northeast and northwest corners of the wetland (see Figures 1 and 3). Vegetation in the forested area is dominated by Pacific willow, although Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia) is present in the northern portion of the forested area. Red osier dogwood is the dominant understory plant, although Himalayan blackberry is also present. Herbaceous species in the forest include reed canarygrass, bittersweet nightshade, and hedge bindweed. Stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) and yellowflag iris (Iris pseudacorus) are also common in some areas. Emergent portions of Wetland B-2 are dominated by reed canarygrass, but common cattail, and mild waterpepper are also present in areas with seasonal ponding. Soils in Wetland B-2 are mapped as Woodinville silt loam (Snyder et al. 1973). The soils observed in Wetland B-2 are similar to those found in Wetland B-1 (dark to very dark grayish brown silty loam to silty clay loam with fine redoxymorphic features). Wetland B-2 is located in a depression bordered by SW 27 b Street to the north, developed areas (fill) to the south, and berms to the east and west. The topography of Wetland B-2 is relatively flat, with a few micro -depressions that trap and hold water. Shallow inundated areas were found in the northern third of Wetland B-2. Wetland B-2 is separated from Springbrook Creek by a maintained berm. A small ditch begins in the forested area on the northern third of Wetland B-2. The ditch extends through the berm to Springbrook Creek. This ditch effectively drains the northern portion of the wetland. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report 7 a;��aT nspertatbn May 2005 10 A culvert on Springbrook Creek upstream of Unit B has historically constricted flow of the stream, resulting in flooding of adjacent areas. To alleviate this and associated upstream flooding north of SW 27`h Street, the culvert under the road was recently replaced (1999). This replacement subsequently removed the constriction of flow through Springbrook Creek. Since this constriction has been removed, the impact of Springbrook Creek on the hydroperiod of Wetland B-2 is unclear. The remaining buffers of Wetland B-2 are somewhat wider than those of Wetland B-1. The Oakesdale Avenue SW Mitigation Site and Wetland B-1 are located to the west of Wetland B-2, and Springbrook Creek and Wetland A-1 are located to the east. The northern edge of Wetland B-2 extends to the fill slope of SW 27`h Street, which is dominated by domestic grasses, non-native forbs, and Himalayan blackberry. New construction is located to the south of the wetland, and associated parking surfaces extend nearly to the wetland edge. Wetland B-2 is a relatively large wetland with multiple habitat types. The system provides a connection between Wetlands 13-1 and A-1 as well as to other habitats along Springbrook Creek, the BNSF Railroad, and the Green River. Wetland B-3 Palustrine forested Category 3 0.3 acre in Unit B/0.3 acre overall Wetland B-3 is a relatively small (0.3 acre) palustrine forested wetland (Cowardin et al. 1979). It is located in a swale between Wetland 13-1 and SW 27`h Street, and extends west to Oakesdale Avenue SW (see Figures 1 and 3). Vegetation in Wetland B-3 is similar to the forested portions of Wetland B-1 and includes a canopy of red alder and Pacific willow, with red osier dogwood in the understory. Himalayan blackberry is also present, particularly in the eastern half of the wetland, and on the road prism of SW 27"' Street. Herbaceous vegetation in Wetland B-3 is sparse, although scattered reed canarygrass and common horsetail (Equisetum arvense) are present. Soils in Wetland B-3 are mapped as Woodinville silt loam (Snyder et al. 1973), and the observed soils are similar to those found in Wetland B-1, although some gravels are present. Wetland B-3 is separated from Wetland B-1 by a berm. It is unclear whether Wetland B-3 was excavated and the berm constructed from the excavated material, or if the berm was constructed from fill material from some other location. Water in Wetland B-3 appears to be provided by runoff from SW 27fl' Street. Groundwater may also play a role in the hydrology of this wetland. The buffers for Wetland B-3 include Wetland 13-1 to the south and the fill slopes for Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW 27"' Street to the west and north. The eastern buffer is predominantly Himalayan blackberry, and extends along SW 276 Street to the Oakesdale Avenue SW Mitigation Site. The northern and western buffers are narrow (less than 20 feet wide), limited by the presence of the roadways. Wetland B-3 is small and subject to frequent disturbance. Trash is common in the wetland and its buffers. As a result, it provides little habitat for wildlife, and likely has low relative value. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report - � M St ..n.�.t.tbn May 2005 11 Unit C Project biologists delineated three wetlands (C-1, C-2, and C-3) in Unit C on October 22, 26, 27, and 28, 2004 and on November 2, 3, and 5, 2004. A summary of these wetlands is provided below. Wetland C-1 Palustrine forested and scrub/shrub Category 2 21.2 acres in Unit C/33.9 acres overall Wetland C-1 is a palustrine forested-scrub/shrub depressional wetland (Cowardin et al. 1979) approximately 33.9 acres in size, 21.2 acres of which are within Unit C. Wetland C-1 is located along the north and east sides of Unit C, and extends northward onto Boeing property (see Figures 1 and 4). Pockets of scrub -shrub communities occur within the larger forested community. Most of these shrub communities have hydric soils and are dominated by wetland vegetation, although there are several small areas of fill material within the larger wetland matrix vegetated by monocultures of Himalayan blackberry. Vegetation in Wetland C-1 includes a canopy of red alder and black cottonwood, with an understory of Sitka willow (Salix sitchensis), red osier dogwood, and hardhack (Spiraea douglasii). Herbaceous species in the forested areas include a mixture of creeping buttercup, bittersweet nightshade, and reed canarygrass. Shrub communities in Wetland C-1 include Pacific willow, red osier dogwood, hardback, and Himalayan blackberry. Soils in Wetland C-1 are mapped as a mixture of Woodinville silt loam and Puyallup fine sandy loam (Snyder et al. 1973). The soils observed in wetland test pits were generally dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) silt loam with fine redoxymorphic features. Previous studies (Parametrix 2002) indicate that some portions of Wetland C-1 may be comprised of fill material. Wetland C-1 appears to receive water from precipitation and from elevated groundwater levels. A ditch crosses Wetland C-1 near the northern property line, but does not appear to provide water to Wetland C-1. Rather, this ditch appears to have been constructed to convey water away from Wetland C-1 and under Oakesdale Avenue SW through a culvert north of Unit C. A shallow swale with no defined channel does cross the central portion of Wetland C-1, traveling from north to south. This swale appears to be a remnant of the original drainage shown on the soil survey (Snyder et al. 1973). Wetland C-1 extends east to the edge of the fill prism of Oakesdale Avenue SW. The road slope is dominated by a dense thicket of Himalayan blackberry adjacent to the wetland. Closer to Oakesdale Avenue SW, the right-of-way consists of mowed grasses with disturbance -tolerant forbs (lance -leaf plantain [Plantago lanceolata], tansy [Tanacetum vulgare], teasel [Dipsacus sylvestris], and thistle [Cirsium vulgare]). North of Unit C, Wetland C-1 includes emergent areas dominated by reed canarygrass and disturbed upland meadows. The area immediately west of Wetland C-1 is primarily Himalayan blackberry, grading into the emergent portion of Wetland C-2. The areas to the south of Wetland C-1 include dense thickets of Himalayan blackberry and Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius), and a surrounding meadow with mixed grasses (bentgrasses [Agrostis spp.], orchard grass [Dactylis glomerata], and ryegrass [Lolium sp.]) and disturbance -tolerant forbs (lance -leaf plantain, St. Johnswort [Hypericum perforatum], tansy, and thistle). Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report - wW htrWnt St to Tno.po.tatbn May 2005 12 a '" � . Far- �.♦ � ,� �. .a w-�...�YIa._�,-�..F.. - . a � � ,� t i L ` N 3 e r +F sr ,A 71. it Uvrw � CN FL a CL 5-ze 01 y� +d�"+., ro ;. r : .�.. �"�`-�,a � +tit 3•�"" -"!�!' .y"i'KJe^ .,g , wp ♦� k i� 4, 74,E a k� Wetland C-1 is a relatively large wetland with multiple habitat types. Songbirds and raptors (likely red- tailed hawks) were observed in the wetland and in the adjacent uplands, and a raptor nest was observed. Coyotes were also observed in this area. Connectivity to other habitats is very good, making this a desirable location for restoration. Wetland C-2 Palustrine forested and emergent Category 3 5.8 acres in Unit C/48.5 acres overall Wetland C-2 is a palustrine forested and emergent depressional wetland (Cowardin et al. 1979) approximately 48.5 acres in size; 5.8 acres of Wetland C-2 are within Unit C. The forested area occupies the eastern and southern portion of wetland C-2, and the emergent community occurs in the west alongside the BNSF Railroad right-of-way (Figures 1 and 4). Vegetation in the forested area is dominated by black cottonwood and Pacific willow with an understory of Scouler's willow, red osier dogwood, and Himalayan blackberry. The emergent community is dominated by reed canarygrass. Soils in Wetland C-2 are mapped as Woodinville silt loam and Puget silty clay loam (Snyder et al. 1973). The soils observed in Wetland C-2 are dark grayish brown silt loam with medium-sized redoxymorphic features. As noted above, portions of Wetland C-2 may include fill soils (Parametrix 2002). Topography in Wetland C-2 is relatively flat and evenly sloped, although hummocks are present in emergent areas. Wetland C-2 appears to receive water from precipitation and from elevated groundwater levels. A north -south running ditch divides the forested portions of Wetland C-2 from the emergent communities. This ditch continues north beyond the wetland boundary before turning east and entering Wetland C-l. As noted in the description of Wetland C-1, the ditch appears to have been constructed to convey water away from Unit C. Wetland C-2 extends to the edge of the BNSF right-of-way on the west. The vegetation to the north of Wetland C-2 is dominated by Himalayan blackberry. A large, disturbed upland is located to the east of Wetland C-2 (see description of upland west of Wetland C-1). Wetland C-2 extends south beyond the boundary of Unit C with similar vegetation communities throughout the system. Wetland C-2 is a large wetland with multiple habitat types. Songbirds, raptors, and coyotes were observed in Wetland C-2 and in the adjacent uplands. As noted for Wetland C-1, connectivity to other habitats is very good, making this a desirable location for restoration. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report 7 MtaT n�portatbn May 2005 14 Wetland C-3 Palustrine forested Category 3 0.9 acres in Unit C/48.5 acres overall Wetland C-3 is a palustrine forested depressional wetland (Cowardin et al. 1979). It is connected to Wetland C-2, and the wetland complex extends offsite to the south. The total size is approximately 48.5 acres (including Wetland C-2), but the portion of Wetland C-3 in Unit C is approximately 0.9 acre. It is located in the southern -central portion of Unit C, north of the BNSF warehouse on Oakesdale Avenue SW (Figures 1 and 4). Wetland C-3 extends offsite to the south and west, and appears to be connected to Wetland C-2 beyond the Unit boundary. Wetland C-3 has a canopy of black cottonwood and Pacific willow, with an understory of red osier dogwood, Himalayan blackberry, and Sitka willow. Herbaceous vegetation is largely absent. Soils in Wetland C-3 are mapped as Puyallup fine sandy loam (Snyder et al. 1973). The observed soils are dark grayish brown gravelly loam with fine redoxymorphic features. Soils in Wetland C-3 may include fill as noted in Wetlands C-1 and C-2 (Parametrix 2002). A small drainage formerly traversed Unit C, but it appears to have been buried by subsequent activity on the site. This buried drainage may still provide subsurface water to Wetland C-3. Other potential sources of water include direct precipitation and elevated groundwater levels. A large disturbed upland is located to the north and west of Wetland C-3. This upland is several feet higher than the surrounding wetland and appears to be comprised primarily of fill material. Vegetation in the upland is dominated by invasive species including Himalayan blackberry and Scot's broom, with mixed grasses and disturbance -tolerant forbs (see description of southern buffer for Wetland C-1). A disturbed emergent wetland community (primarily bentgrass sp.) is located to the south of Wetland C-3, and a commercial/light industrial site with associated parking is located to the southeast of Wetland C-3. Although Wetland C-3 is small and relatively disturbed, it provides a valuable pocket of habitat bordered on one side by an industrial area. Wetland C-3 is connected to other relatively large wetlands and uplands to the north and south, and the nearby BNSF right-of-way provides a linear corridor connecting Wetland C-3 to other habitats. Unit D Project biologists visited Unit D on October 21, 2004, and delineated one wetland (13-1). A summary of Wetland D-1 is provided below. Wetland D-1 Palustrine forested, scrub/shrub, and emergent Category 2 5.6 acres in Unit D/6.7 acres overall Wetland D-1 is approximately 6.7 acres in size; 5.6 acres of the wetland are in Unit D (Figures 1 and 5). The wetland includes palustrine forested, scrub/shrub, and emergent communities (Cowardin et al. 1979). The forested areas are located primarily along the BNSF right-of-way and to the south. Portions of the forested wetland extend north off of the site. The emergent community covers the eastern and northern portions of Wetland D-1. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report Aft at ,,, ,�,,� May 2005 15 0 "> AN R } ti C% Figure 5 Unit D Wetland Delineation j Parcel 0 Surveyed Wetland Q Interpreted (off -site) Wetland N Data Plot w+E s 0 200 400 Feet Vegetation in the forested areas includes red alder and black cottonwood; Pacific willow and Oregon ash in the canopy; and salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), red osier dogwood, and hardback in the understory. Reed canarygrass, lady fern (Athyrium filix femina), and creeping buttercup are the dominant herbaceous species. Vegetation in the emergent community is dominated by reed canarygrass, common cattail, and mild waterpepper. Wetland D-1 is situated in a depression with relatively steep slopes to the east and west. Topography within Wetland D-1 is flat, with a few micro -depressions and many hummocks in the emergent area. Soils in Wetland D-1 are mapped as Snohomish silt loam and Puget silty clay loam (Snyder et al. 1973). The soils observed in test pits were generally grayish brown (10YR 5/2) silty clay to silty clay loam. Fine redoxymorphic features were common in most areas. Water appears to enter Wetland D- 1 directly as precipitation, and via elevated groundwater. Several areas of bare earth with cracked soil were observed in the emergent areas. Wetland D-1 occupies the majority of Unit D. The southern third of the unit includes an existing mitigation site, which is bordered on the north by a dense thicket of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus). East of Wetland D-1, a narrow, mowed area with planted shrub (primarily oceanspray [Holodiscus discolor] and red osier dogwood) separates the wetland from adjacent parking and commercial buildings. The southeastern buffer is dominated by black cottonwood with a dense understory of Himalayan blackberry. On the west, Wetland D-1 extends to the edge of the maintained BNSF right-of-way. A railroad spur and several undeveloped parcels owned by the railroad complete the northern buffer. Wetland D-1 is a relatively large wetland with multiple vegetation types. The buffers are disturbed, particularly those to the east and west; however, those to the north and south contain relatively extensive areas of open space. The BNSF right-of-way provides connections to other habitats to the north and south. Unit E Unit E is a triangular parcel located east of Oakesdale Avenue SW, approximately 400 feet south of SW 34'b Avenue in Renton (Section 25, T23N, R4E). No wetlands were identified on this parcel (Figure 1). The flooded fringe of Springbrook Creek does conform to the wetland definition, however, and is discussed below. Unit E was filled within the last 20 years. The site is roughly 15 feet higher in elevation than the adjacent creek. Unit E is vegetated with ruderal species and colonizing trees and shrubs. Along the stream banks, red alder trees have established a well -developed canopy over most of this section of stream. The understory is dominated by reed canarygrass and Himalayan blackberry. The flooded fringe of the creek is completely dominated by reed canarygrass. Soils are composed of gravelly sandy loam that was placed as fill, and silt loam may represent historic floodplain soils. Hydrology is primarily maintained by the surface water of Springbrook Creek. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report 7 w M aT fln May 2005 17 References Cooke, S.S. 1997. A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington and Northwest Oregon. Seattle Audubon Society, Seattle, Washington. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Ecology (Washington State Department of Ecology). 1997. Washington State wetland identification and delineation manual, Publication #96-94. Olympia, Washington. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y- 87-1, Environmental Laboratory, Department of the Army, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Greytag Macbeth Corporation. 1994. Munsell soil color charts. Hitchcock, C.L. and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington. NRCS (Natural Resource Conservation Service). 2003. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States. U. S. Department of Agriculture in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. Parametrix, Inc. 2002. Wetland Mitigation Banking Plan for the City of Renton. Prepared by Parametrix, Inc. for the City of Renton. Renton, Washington. Pojar, J. and A. MacKinnon. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Lone Pine Publishing, Redmond, Washington. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1997. Revision of the national list of plant species that occur in wetlands. U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, D.C. Renton, City of. 2004. Renton Municipal Code, Title 4, Chapter 3, Section 4 (available at hitp://www.mrsc.org/codes.aspx). City of Renton, Washington. Snyder, D.E., P.S. Gale, and R.F. Russell. 1973. Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington. USDA Soil Conservation Service, In Cooperation with Washington Agricultural Experimental Station. United States Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. USDA, NRCS (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2004. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5 (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2004. National Wetland Inventory, Renton, Washington Quadrangle. http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/wtlnds/launch.html. U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife Service. Portland, Oregon. WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation). 2004. Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Prospectus. Prepared for WSDOT. Olympia, Washington. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report 7w. M aT ,,,por,l,,n May 2005 18 WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation). 2004. Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Information Packet. Prepared for WSDOT. Olympia, Washington. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report Go-aPK"Mt St to Transpo.tatbn May 2005 19 Appendix A - Wetland Delineation Methods Wetlands are defined as areas saturated or inundated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and which under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. The methods used to delineate the on -site wetlands conform to methods in Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology 1997). All delineated wetlands were instrument -surveyed and mapped on project base maps. Field data sheets for wetlands are provided in Appendix B. To be considered a wetland, an area must have hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. HDR Engineering, Inc. staff collected data on these parameters in areas representative of typical site conditions. Staff collected additional data in associated uplands as needed to confirm wetland and stream boundaries. The wetland boundaries were delineated with numbered, bright pink flagging. Boundaries were numbered in the order in which they were encountered in the field, and numbering does not necessarily reflect geographic location. Vegetation The dominant plants and their wetland indicator status were evaluated to determine if the vegetation was hydrophytic. Hydrophytic vegetation is defined as vegetation adapted to wetland conditions. To meet the hydrophytic vegetation criterion, more than 50 percent of the dominant plants must be Facultative, Facultative Wetland, or Obligate, based on the wetland indicator category assigned to each plant species by USFWS (Reed 1997). Table A-1 lists the definitions of the indicator categories. Table A-1. Definitions of Wetland Plant Indicator Categories used to Determine the Presence of Hydrophytic Vegetation Wetland Indicator Category Symbol Definition Obligate Wetland Plants OBL Plants that almost always (> 99% of the time) occur in wetlands, but which may rarely (< 1 % of the time) occur in non -wetlands. Facultative Wetland Plants FACW Plants that often (67 to 99% of the time) occur in wetlands, but sometimes (1 to 33% of the time) occur in non -wetlands. Facultative Plants FAC Plants with a similar likelihood (34 to 66% of the time) of occurring in both wetlands and non - wetlands. Facultative Upland Plants FACU Plants that sometimes (1 to 33% of the time) occur in wetlands, but occur more often (67 to 99% of the time) in non -wetlands. Upland Plants UPL Plants that rarely (< 1 % of the time) occur in wetlands, and almost always (> 99% of the time) occur in non -wetlands. Source: Reed (1997) Project biologists used A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington and Northwest Oregon (Cooke 1997) and Plants of the Pacific Northwest (Pojar and MacKinnon 1994) as field references to assist with plant identification. Scientific and common plant names follow currently accepted nomenclature. Most names are consistent with Flora of the Pacific Northwest (Hitchcock and Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report 7 :a=:o:aT ,,,,„,n May 2005 A-1 Cronquist 1973) and the PLANTS Database (USDA 2004). During the field investigation, staff observed and recorded the dominant plant species on data sheets for each data plot (Appendix B). Soils Generally, an area must contain hydric soils to be a wetland. Hydric soil forms when soils are saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (12 inches). Biological activities in saturated soil result in reduced oxygen concentrations and organisms turn to anaerobic processes for metabolism. Over time, anaerobic biological processes result in certain soil color patterns, which are used as indicators of hydric soil. Typically, low-chroma colors are formed in the soil matrix, and bright -colored redoximorphic features form within the matrix. Other important hydric soil indicators include organic matter accumulations in the surface horizon, reduced sulfur odors, and organic matter staining in the subsurface (MRCS 2003). Project staff examined soils by excavating sample pits to a depth of 16 inches or more to observe soil profiles, colors, and textures. Munsell color charts (Greytag Macbeth 1994) were used to describe soil colors. Hydrology Project staff examined the area for evidence of hydrology. Wetland hydrology criteria were considered to be satisfied if it appeared that the soil was seasonally inundated or saturated to the surface for a consecutive number of days greater than or equal to 12.5 percent of the growing season. The growing for the area was determined based on the period in which temperatures are above 28 degrees F five years out of ten (Washington State Department of Ecology 1997). Temperature data from the two nearest stations (Kent and SeaTac, Washington) was reviewed. The Kent station was the more conservative of the two, and lists the growing season as extending from March 8 until November 11 (http://www.wcc.nres.usda.gov/). Primary indicators of hydrology include surface inundation and saturated soils. Secondary indicators of hydrology include drainage patterns, watermarks on vegetation, water -stained leaves, and oxidized root channels. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report 7 w•aP;„�,;;•T ,,,,�• May 2005 A-2 Appendix B - Wetland Data Sheets Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report �w mSte May 2005 -;; Transportation B'1 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: r04k Date: lD Z--010 Applicant/owner: County: K�K1 State: ujk J Investi ator s : Q S/T/R: ^Z it1 1 Do Normal Circumstances xist on the site? no Community M Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)9 es n Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot ID: Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) IDominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Phti�hr: S nrhv �;hwc�h koo �ht ln/ Av�k r4C1� HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: I % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC 10 y Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes no Water Marks: yes Sediment Deposits: yes on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes n Drainage Patterns: yes o ✓ other (explain) w.r4l c,(, .. -+-e �&A�, Dept. of inundation: 0 inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes nd': //�, inches Channels <12 in. es no Depth to free water in pit: __SL FAC Neutral: yes o Water -stained Leaves yes,ta' Depth to saturated soil: —0 inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: _ Wetland hydrology present? ye no Rationale for decision/Remarks. '4 t 'At'G 5 p /f 5 ll� � -�(� �1 G.S �t1ve o� .in ✓.�c�Flo✓. o�y SOILS Map Unit Name T L (Series & Phase) Taxonomy (subgroup)-�A�"'�—�vJa�v,s 1�7e�lct,r, d � Flo �f- 1 Drainage Class Field observations confirm Yes No Profile Description Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix color (Munsell moist Mottle colors (Munsell moist) Mottle abundance size & contrast Texture, concretions, structure, etc. Drawing of soil profile (match description) 14>G s; Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma S 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime _ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? ye no Rationale for decision/RernarCl' :I I LDIn� LIn✓�y�,r � r� V � lam) I\ Mkt / 1A.- TO.1 S C V, to rV Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? no Hydric soils present? ye no Wetland h drolo resent? e no Is the sampling point yes no within a wetland? Rattii(on ale/Remarks: i ,O -r-��5 h�I � C r.�Q✓:�. a�J� �S tl� tv�e �✓�1 ,,. .✓�-��p�� NOTES: Revised 4/97 , DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1997 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Spf;,�brdml� fti�n't Date: 'p121 pCj Applicant/owner: County: State: W p Investi ato s : rvi p S/T/R: o ZZ3�' TZ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? gyi Community ID: -P-Cp Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes Transect ID: A- Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot ID: Z Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator 7,4t 0 �4 1A 1 ` 2� F 1 N o f MCn wC V l V C HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: FACW, & FAC LilIr" $ b7o % of dominants OBL, Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database_ Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities ITechnical Literature Other ex lain Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: S",t( -s �vrn;rn+Lrl� h� t`7d�o��yfi;� �c�cth+;o� HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season. no Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes o on Based on: soil temp (record temp —�_ ) Drift Lines: y no Drainage Patterns: yes n. other(explain)�o �• t �I w w+e Dept. of inundation: D inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes n 2 n Chanels <12 i .es no.. FAC Neutral: yes no' Water -stained Leaves fes no Depth to free water in pit: inches Depth to saturated soil: inches \ Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale` for decision/Remarks: 1 �� IQ� J ale- 7�10 V✓S S�h V�I`h1/ � .n �`C t+l '�1�J 1 (� i, (� SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) T —� Drainage Class r�r Field observations confirm Yes No Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) C9 -11 /} lv R 3,h 7, L Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma _< 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _ Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks Hydric soils present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: L`� cl.�� , r � f: i1 S -tl-- c�.�v a.. �� 'x79A/:` 5ue=\1 Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? es— no Hydric soils present? ye no Wetland hydrology resent? es no Is the sampling point yes no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: NOTES: Q �/ Revised 4/97 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: SP. ; „� � r ov V_ �� ,-� A Date: /0 lu �Z a Applicant/owner: County: K; //�� Investi ato s: MA State: L JA S/T/R: Do Normal Circumstances bxist on the site? VSSno Community :Is Transect ID: the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? iA„:t A Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot ID: 3 Explanation of a ical or roblem area: l/ VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum % cover Indicator �A q6 Hn) T 70 FAC ��1;X I :�.��r•. Ur H Fit -r r� - c CA HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: - % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC I Q ], Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? y no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes no Water Marks: yes Sediment Deposits: yes on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes Drainage Patterns: yes ✓ other (explain) locdt a- a,�r_ Dept. of inundation: --- --� -inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: o; yes Channels <12 in. es Depth to free water in pit: inches Ainches FAC Neutral: yes Water -stained Leaves yes Depth to saturated soil: Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: L S SOILS 2'f-ta ---zd I o-f- � Map Unit Name 5!I:AkftkA,s S , ` N- L. w--k Drainage Class t (Series & Phase) Field observations confirm Yes No Taxonomy (subgroup) i s t L - j', V ,'Z 's mapped type? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concreti-ons, Drawing of soil (inches) (Mansell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist)(match description) Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol / x Matrix chroma <_ 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (ex lain in remarks) Hydric soils present? s no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Wetland Determination (circle) no Hydric soils present? no Hydrophytic vegetation present? 1—r Wetland hydrology resent? o Is the sampling point es no within a wetland? Ration ale/Remarks: f 1 1, L(At �\`S rnl� TrU P% C'ViiLl,✓ ( �I/�j/� i TI,4-V¢ f� �/_ r IIP TlN►^//`• NOTES: Remised 4/97 /" DATA FORM 1 (Revised). Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: "Drin j brook - Un T / Jj a . Date: Applicant/owner: County:Kin State: t1VA Investi ator(s): 41: wl#cr, M. Boc keljkom , n. Taq her, 13. #ollowi S/T/R: -T Z3A %L Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? yes no Community ID: T" Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes no Transect ID: Gv;,-re_ t.vi'J �_ I Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes (2n Plot ID: -4t/ Explanation of atypical or 2roblem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum %cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum %cover Indicator ,54 ) 1 U C, J e w S 2 o. Q 1, V-1-I- �cic 1i k,ruji t 4� 85. 40-L1✓ 7U1WhV> �- (lVI[IAWtGt.r HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC 1 o , Z �Z- = 1 0 a Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in / Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation ✓ Wetland plant database ✓ Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature Other ex lain Hydrophytic vegetation present? (23 es� no I Rationale for decision/Remarks: hy�lroPhyric ve9etczHon �S CiGm�nanr. HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? ems, no Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes(:no) other ex lain Ieca�l cA, "mart- WeA_ Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in. yes n , Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: e no Water -stained Leaves yes no Depth to saturated soil: inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: _ Wetland hydrology present? ryes . no Rationale for decision/Remarks: P,r�f)e'r � hy(rrVPhy hc ve chfie" Mri"-'fr- �'Oe f la nhy�f,�� y , , s Tc e F1 Pi"V"aG lc7t I/(- �a.�s SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) Taxonomy (subgroup) %�^��to �►str' -��vvu Drainage Class oo� Field observations confirm Yes No mapped type? U Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concret ions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) A, ;o y2 4-12. 7. 5yR ` /6 � ��, s f; ., �t 5 o - // 1 f , 7.5 ^ Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol ✓ Matrix chroma :5 2 with m ottles Histic Epipedon X Mg or Fe Concretions X Sulfidic Odor x: High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime X Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions ✓ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (-1) matrix _ Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? N s ) no Rationale for decision/Remarks: A chC_cl 07 I &GV ' ti m a, A, ja M e z » X GG�� ,*rh a v2 t d� � ,u rr 1 t 5- Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? des ► no Hydric soils present? ( e�) no Is the sampling point �e1 no Wetland hydrology resent? es) no within a wetland? Ration ale1Remarks: h to c at P 3 t oG C.«- I ar r NOTES: Revised 4/97 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Sp», j b►'-ok — Uhi4- 8. Date: Applicant/owner: County: State: WA Investi ator(s): +6, 1% slow- S/T/R: - Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? yes no Community ID:� Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes LE� Transect ID: t,-cv_,jr, a . Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes no Plot ID: /"/04 N a Explanation of aty ical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator �o�jl�/wt Uli -�✓► fi �0 0+� / _ S7AI lt.L1,G x - ! . /0 I 2o. p I Pe/j ©n"i. ers)ca� __C_t'/ n 1 p e / �I OnuM dre eroid � y �j 0 C-I '6 HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC �/ _- Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation X Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations x Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature L�X Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: U HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes no Water Marks: Cye`�s no Sediment Deposits: yes no on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no other (explain) tDcQ t c,(. ,, -te 41--.i Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no �� N. Depth to free water in inches Channels <12 in. es no FAC Neutral: Water pit: '—� yes no stained Leaves ye no Depth to saturated soil: f inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial hoto gra hs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: �7 ---- ------------ Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) Taxonomv (sub.erouol �Ti.��'S��c:, ��.ra a-v?r�t✓�S Profile Description Drainage Class Qa cf lv ( r vL, Yl0 Field observations confirm Yes Id mapped tune? Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix color (Munsell Mottle colors (Munsell Mottle abundance size & contrast Texture, concretions, structure, etc, Drawing of soil profile moist) moist) (match description) 4 /0y23/?. 1(2y12 `OP Common, -fine. 1)ro"inen4 Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) X Histosol Matrix croma <_ 2 with mottles X Histic Epipedon X Mg or Fe Concretions X Sulfidic Odor /X High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils -X Aquic Moisture Regime X Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List i< Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: oxid'lzcd roo� CAetr)r)e15'r redC4C;7lq GLncl�fion5, /ow cbro-- w/ md/'cS. Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? (es> no Hydric soils present? ® no Wetland hydrology resent? es no Is the sampling point no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: /%')rc�s u(l 3 �.�ef/Q.nc� incli�Qfars. NOTES: Revised 4/97 DATA FORM 14Revised) Routine Wetland I)e-termination (WA State Wetland Deli atioxfManual or 1987 Corps Wetland Defneation Manual Project/Site: Date: 1�,/?�/OTC Applicant/owner: L' County: A-V4�e State: tvA investigator(s)7 ator(s): �' Tpl�dZil i%• S/T/R: Z5 -T Z ,v � e Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? yes nA Community ID: We� d Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes <:Z1)` ` Tiansect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes P1ot,ID: PJpf *3, .. Explanation of a ical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herbi_V vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum %cover Indicator S" iX l u c.i cFat- ✓- la_ S t ant d r A I�r�vti./s 5P r•iL�e� HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: i % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC Oo o Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database r� Morphological adaptations L� Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature Other explain Hydrophytic vegetation present? ee no Rationale for decision/Remarks: r / vi{ ae 't-m;t v, S �- `- O +�L / ✓het-T�e` 'f y (,c. J' O / �j S l cP�O l HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? es no Water Marks: no -Sediment Deposits: yes no on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) ( Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no ✓ other(explain) / —( Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no u Depth to free water in pit: inches Channels <12 inEeD no FAC Neutral: yes no Water -stained Leave ye no Depth to saturated soil: inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? es no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ri Q T t GCe r A 6 - SOILS Map Unit Name b✓oaji'v��,' � 51 (Series & Phase) Taxonomv (su Profile Description Depth Horizon (inches) o - iZ4 1 A kAa,¢..r-,kS w"a.r►d (.6-1 lv - Drainage Class Po o rl ,-a 1, n Field observations confirni yes 1 mapped type? Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast moist) moist) `l( ""` , i)'�'d f um, d s fi,-i>c-f Texture, concretions, structure, etc. S c /� loam Drawing of soil profile (match description) Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma <_ 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfrdic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=I) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? CiesD no Rationale for decision/Remarks: �` / e (Lo r.✓ ro w �0 1 S w� t%t P a m I �lc"t J - Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? no Hydric soils present? ye no Is the sampling point es no Wetland hydrology resent? es no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: NOTES: DATA FORM V(Revised) Routine Wetland I60termination (WA State Wetland Deli eatio"anual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site:h brn�- U Pa- Date: %%o/a4 Applicant/owner: - County: Investi ator(s): Q f�,�� &rt9 .. �1/L State: (�(f�1. S/T/R: Z .5 T R L7 Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es n, Community I b Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes Transect ID: Is the area a potentjal Problem Afea? yes no Plot•ID: /9/0f -11�iw��( Explanation of atyical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb `V.vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator 5�1;)c I�U;cQ� vi✓ �1 Ply:✓ f► r. r ►1lti%P 14 15. ��-GL✓ VlL2 HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION -INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC o07n 2/Z Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database _ X Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Ll c S v t i a w i S o v.-�, ;✓ 8 by `� 7G� J^ p �1 L j f�i c !�O i l/ HYDROLOGY no = Sediment Deposits: yes no Is it the growing season? yes no Water Marks:7yes on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines:no DrainagePatterns: yes no other ex lain ►ocu.aDept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Roo(veots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 i e no Depth to free water in pit: Lb inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water -stained Leaves yes no Depth to saturated soil: _f ; inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: _ Wetland hydrology present? ye no Rationale for decision/Remarks: n n n r a— e,2 G 0 C, 6 SQILSS Map Unit Name Wg� , n �> �'� !/ ✓ i (+ (oa,,v1, (Series & Phase) Taxonomv (sub TIvJa.a-u Drainage Class oo�� Field observations confimi . �YerNo mapped type? Profile Description Depth (inches) Horizon ' Matrix color (Munsell moist) Mottle colors (Munsell moist) Mottle abundance size & contrast Texture, concretions, structure, etc. Drawing of soil pro file (match description) /O y2 3/-�Z Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol /" v Matrix chroma <_ 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or, Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (ex lain in remarks) Hydric soils present? es no Rationale for decision/Remarks: / Law G.Vvro� sM��fin wi7� (�py�CX I��✓�`�t T� t^ 1Gc�`, L �i % Cam, fe�ro'�. Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? q no Hydric soils present? � no Wetland hydrology resent? es no Is the sampling point es no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: 1-a 3 t f7c�m u� ef,,. c� /�, s M..e.4 . is Gzd' Q n �'s w, t4' h o� NOTES: Revised 4/97 t : DATA FORM I (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 7OQ'1 f'- IV flo A ilutinvatinn Manual) Project/Site: B _prlrjbrook- - Una Date: /a/zo/off Applicant/owner: County: State: vvr+ Investieator(s): �• ��/ol�Q P To her M, ffu><<n M. S/T/R: 2_5 i Z3N g -AL Do Normal Circumstances exist on the ite? ye no Community ID: F F• Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes nod Transect ID: is the area a potential Problem Area? yes (2) Plot ID: Rlofl3- Ex lanation of a ical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Al �.ct, �G�ri 5 ce f�✓�GU' na�-C C .7 . -�Q,G � �I �anv►,er5,car" }} /5. HYUMVYIYY IAt- v11,"K, tflava % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Morphological adaptations Technical Literature I ydrophytic vegetation present? ye Rationale for decision/Remarks: / Physiological/reproductive adaptations ✓_ Wetland plant database Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Other (explain) no h1 '-Yrcphyf7 C vc9n ar, HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes no Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: ye no _I/ —other (explain) Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in. yes. no Depth to free water in pit: 7 inches `d14 FAC Neutral: yes no Water -stained Leaves yeci Depth to saturated soil: __0_ inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial hoto ra hs: Other: Welland hydrology present? cffno Rationale for decision/Remarks: ;rI l(.ti 4Tt'�1 n7 '>L./i'i <7'P StP nr'(i [—)Q jer J - SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) Taxonom Profile Description S Drainage Class Field observations confirm yes mapped type? Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Mansell size. & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) 0- /'f A /D Ye 4-12. /c yR 519 Common, -Fine, p rami n e n day " common, Fi�c Pro Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol / Matrix chroma < 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __,Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on NationaULocal Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks Hydric soils present? es no Rationale for decision/Remarks: /7)cr�riX �hromct ?with mot /e� ►ttQ,e{5 -f ��,c� S0.11 'Le'ct'd"- 1 Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? es no Hydric soils present? es no Is the sampling point �se no Wetland hydrology resent? � no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: %rle/i�afars. a wPf�an�. �Q� so,"T �2 �0cLdiO)1. W�yTltilrt GL- S NOTES: Re -'iced 4197 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: SJJn nyb —ook Uni f a Date: Applicant/owner: County: K%n� State: W4 Investi ator(s): -15• 411owG , M, S/T/R: 5 Tz -V Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? y no Community ID: pl5S' Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes Problem Transect ID: P/o r3'7- Is the area a potential Area? yes l/ Plot ID: f Z �w2t—�a''� Ex lanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum %cover Indicator rja-(�yc Iv�.iGla. vtir• � N� go. S Za bare ro vn d. i) 5Ci HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: 313 =1 ao� % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities ✓ Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: I�—//I �� tJ4LvU.�i.ar- �C� Apwt�hs.�QIJ� b, hf�/'O' 7�G S G�1�is HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes no Water Marks: es no Sediment Deposits: yes no on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: <es no other (explain) (Jo c,-t CI,,, le 6C�, Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in. yes no Depth to free water in pit: 7l inches FAC Neutral:. yes no Water -stained Leave yes no Depth to saturated soil: inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photo ra hs: Other: _ Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: dre,Inaf-15Wale :n middle of P/.ot) Soils 574�.A�ra4ec-/. SOILS Map Unit Name Snol�.ow, ►�1., 5i It low (Series & Phase) Taxonomv (sub iC' ilvvmA AtS Drainage Class E5�V'1w otth� Field observation s confirm Yes No K Profile Description Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix color (Munsell moist) Mottle colors (Munsell moist) Mottle abundance size & contrast Texture, concretions, structure, etc. Drawing of soil profile (match description) /0 y12 1 Z. 7. S)/12 41 4'. )brom,nen/ Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime —� Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix ✓ Matrix chrorna <_ 2 with mottles Mg or Fe Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Listed on NationalfLocal Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks Hydric soils present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks. oxidized rhiz'P.,Crej reducin� cone-11HO-s, rnofiix ehrorna eQ W/ mef/les Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? 3es no Hydric soils present? no Wetland hydrology resent? es no Is the sampling point yes no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: ol,t( 3 L�r tF�na� 0 re Pry • 50.vK-� ��- �Cca�"t� o vL S /rt cz. LT%Yi dcPressior) +hQf ho/c!s wofec- shrub e.ancloeSnllO,, v,— fi0,7 {0 row in Aol f-aF P/of ✓ NOTES: Revised 4/97 DATA FORM I (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: SP'rfnj brook — Uh i 4-_ I6 Date: l0/-20/04t. Applicant/o,wrier: County: State: V/VA Investi ator s : llhllpw 61*6ken k S/T/R: 7�1S 1 TZ V E Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? :y s— nb Community ID: Po Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes CH�) Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot ID: Akf 43/w.z tkcvl- 5 - Z Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum %cover Indicator pry goy,) Q GvJ C� ✓ 'Lo r v 0 C � HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: 3 /4 7 5 /O OBL, % of dominants FACW, & FAC Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual obsefvation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: 4.7 Y-�p(,,r-�,C, I HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? es no Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no —7— other (explain) tac.Q,t Dept. of inundation: 4Linches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in. yes no Depth to free water in pit: 69 inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water -stained Leaves es no Depth to saturated soil: (v inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: _ Wetland hydrology present? ye no Rationale for decision/Remarks: %y y SOILS Map Unit Name 5K r,^4,152 - Si It (oa-►�,. (Series & Phase) Taxonomv (sub Profile Description "'ty4S Drainage Class aoor-14 4ra4tn¢A Field observations confirm Yes No Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix color (Munsell moist) Mottle colors (Munsell moist) Mottle abundance size & contrast Texture, concretions, structure, etc. Drawing of soil profile (match description) - A /ay2 `L/a a ,-�,/oyR ►'o mi n en f �%am Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma <_ 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? <--� � no Rationale for decision/Remarks. 06 C't- ,.,A- �A,X �,.,-ct- ttlqS Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? e no Hydric soils present? yes no Wetland hydrology resent? es no Is the sampling point es no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: .1 NOTES: Revised 4/97 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1 Q5Z'7 ('nrne Worland Delineafon Manual) ?roject/Site: t/,n,�L_ Date: 10 124o b County: Applicant/owner: State: Invest Sator(s): P'TTo � 6 0�•+°� _ S/T/R: Z' I Z l� Q `"� (• 7o Normal Circumstancee exist on the site? no Communi D: (J s the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes >� Transect ID: s the area a potential Problem Area? yes n� Plot ID: Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator 5 -b4 k ce r I b TQt/ Ira .•a �o v a�j i i Jtj O 'CCU C (cJ �pr✓IVS GfG 4� -1-1 �r 7 0 q� /V L v rI q, HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC -~ % Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature '� Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? no Rationale for decision/Remarks: I oS �ttifi o ,� 7 cYa a Q }'r- HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? ye no Water Marks: yes o Sediment Deposits: yes on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Dnft Lines: yes Drainage Patterns: yes other(explain) 1,,,l Dept. of inundation: — inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soi1,�Survey: yes rt6? Channels <12 in. yes n Depth to free water in pit: 7)1& inches FAC Neutral: e no Water -stained Leaves a no Depth to saturated soil: 716 inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: -fO'21 Aerial photoraphs: Other: r�i'ee-C -.a ' it, o S Wetland hydrology present?,.. e no Rationale for decision/Rerrt'ark+s: ?/ / cam- l� U � � / S ,: S U� �P � � �•�t11'dC. U '"�' t � 1 /n.u-rl c�-.-. �/�.J' ,� ,r 1 �� VLSIV 11 RfIi. ��. •.� f I[iays.SGUY ��/'-/OF"I t / ICI vG 5 � ` � Z o " s. � �r G� � ��_ SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) Taxonomv (sub Drainage Class', Field observations confirm Yes No Profile Description Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix color (Munsell Mottle colors (Munsell Mottle abundance size & contrast Texture, concretions, structure, etc. Drawing of soil profile moist) moist) (match description) d— Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol / ✓ Matrix chroma S 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? no Rationale for decision/Remark c-o w !il.- r� n�. w o...,.,,.��.2 �r'e�s ✓vt c.2 p-� - '�.QGE.v� �vt-�I r/J' � 9 I"5 : v� GC. , c-Cc/t,s ✓ e s Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? 6�p no Hydric soils present? ® no Wetland hydrology resent? ae no Is the sampling point e no within a wetland? Ration ale/Remarks: n �/ /6c2Ct/ 6 h NOTES: Revised 4/97 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Sg /• , � f0o k lit W ( Date: l' 15-1,01 Applicant/owner: County: , Investi ator(s): , To fit. A v w— S/T/R: ZS -r Z: Do Normal Circumstances xist on the site? no Community ID: C� Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes n� Transect ID: Plot ID: C C 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes �j� 1„� — Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator J !^ ti� ��✓a� 1� +CA—C Lj �� ✓�ce�. cw�✓ I 1 C- o' O�n [ N 1 L✓ v n� i/Iti> e Y HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC D-0 Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations database areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes - no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes no Water Marks: yes n Sediment Deposits: yes on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes y other(explain) 10 ej Dept. of inundation: inches Local Soil Survey: Oxidized RooTd yes/nq Channels <12Depth to free water in pit: �1-a inches FAC Neutral:Water-stained Leaves yes Depth to saturated soil: �a inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: 14 jib, L 'J S Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: �' SOILS`-� Map Unit Name 4 l .P -C o% �e- 57 � way (Series & Phase) Taxonomy (sub Drainage Class Iva I ray n „ Field observations confirm Yes No mani)ed type? Profile Description Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix color (Munsell moist) Mottle colors (Munsell moist) Mottle abundance size & contrast Texture, conereti ons, structure, etc. Drawing of soil profile (match description) 5-1 i'D 41411 M '.,A Vn Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma S 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Listed on National/Local 13ydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks Hydric soils present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: I �,,p� C�nvoy�,,� d,hJ� �O��S ,t��;c�� tnya�✓;(� 5p� � S Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? no Hydric soils present? no Wetland hydrology resent? no Is the sampling point Des no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: k G ✓ Jf'( NOTES: r Revised 4/97 DATA FORM I (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1997 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: + /((�,� �Oraak �/l l� (� Date: I S /� Applicant/owner: County- , p _ State: ,✓�-' Investi ator(s): f ,� S/T/R: Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? y no Community D: S S Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? es (sip Transect ID: C- Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes 34ro— Plot ID: f�- Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator v c.e,\ 6k uv, HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: OBL, FACW, & FAC % of dominants Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database c Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes no Water Marks: yes no,' Sediment Deposits: yes C_n3 on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes �no' Drainage Patterns: yes' n9' ✓ other (explain) la 4_l C'('-Ui�c Dept. of inundation: — inches Oxidized Root (live roots ) Local Soil Survey: yes.too )18 Channels <12 in. yes , Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes Water -stained Leaves yes( no Depth to saturated soil: _7 (?3 inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes n Rationale for decision/Remarks: IV S� n 5 C�'� SOILS Map Unit Name Pu 10a.., (Series & Phase) Taxonomy (subgrouR) oC i v ✓Qo (lS Profile Description Drainage Class w¢.(( j rat K te"c Field observations confirm yes mapped type? 6) Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix color (Munsell moist) Mottle colors (Munsell moist) Mottle abundance size & contrast Texture, concretions, structure, etc. Drawing of soil profile (match description) 9 Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma S 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes no Hydric soils present? yes no Wetland hydrologyresent? yes no Is the sampling point yes no within a wetland? Rct�ationale/Remarks: e i of, r c, 0 - �� y(? "tV✓e ho—t �'+Li �L NOTES: Lo«A tk v ) � Revised 4/97 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual) ?roject/Site: �5,�4e- (2► Date: Illt-tay Applicant/owner: County: kw ^I State: r/✓/b Investi ator s : 1�• f r- Gtu7�'�"� S/T/R: i s` t rt/ ►Z ' )o Normal Circumstances exist on the site? no Community ID: v@ s the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes 10 Transect ID: LC=1 C__ A Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes r� Plot ID: S _ Explanation of aty2ical or problern area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator ,t ro t{ 25 r 12.(�✓' O 1E 03 rows V za f"rr' Cv -,V•R r i'oE 1 _ C L H DROPHYTIC EGETATION INDICATORS: & FAC % of dominants OBL, FACW, Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? no Water Marks: yes rD Sediment Deposits: yes Based on: soil temp (record temp ) on Drift Lines: yes re Drainage Patterns: yes TO other (explain) Iota-1 CA Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes 0� Channels <12 in. yes rO Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes Water -stained Leaves yes r(� Depth to saturated soil: i Ifl inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes Rationale for decision/Remarks: / J? w�' /v s .".-.d i G�rta r-3 0_�(7 w O r�7 Cti- SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) Taxonomv (sub Profile Description �:HD + DS—U Drainage Class hell Field observations confirm Yes mapped type? Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix color (Munsell moist) Mottle colors (Munsell moist) Mottle abundance size & contrast Texture, concretions, structure, etc. Drawing of soil profile (match description) 6 -mot Al 10 -3 (3 Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma 5 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes Rationale four decision/Remarks: Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes Vo Hydric soils present? yes Wetland hydrology resent? yes 10 Is the sampling point within a wetland? yes Po l/ Rationale/Remarks: NOTES: C'ewtP j -rvr Re-vised 4/97 i DATA FORM 1 (Revised) I Routine Welland- rm' Aon.. _ (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: i k Date: Applicant/owner: County: K • � , Investi atot(s): 2Lv Zm .✓ H"" eel^ State: W S/T/R: N AZ L Communityovt j ►+ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the sit ? yes no Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes en,� Transect ID:Is the ama potential Problem Area? yes :' Plot ID: 'p\ o-r- Explanation of atypical or roblem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) ` 'Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator L ^' '.i ,.i= :`rtE J �� C�✓ 'J ..`�e6OUgl.l,; is � t _ �c.(iu..� ICU ✓�h v�- S r fceA� lj L V m it hi V J. HYDRO HYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations '(~'i'` "jxPersonal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: qo�,,��-t hk, Uy� 1 HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? es no Water Marks: yes "no� Sediment Deposits: yes on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes / 0 Drainage Pattems: yes Jnb other (explain) local G ,M S'a4__ Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root (live root Local Soil Survey: yes J Channels <12 in. yes MV Depth to free water in pit: L inches FAC Neutral: ye no Water -stained Leaves yes Depth to saturated soil: t inches Check all that apply & explain below: Stream, Lake or gage data: Other (explain): r Pr"_4ev� r �� -e� �T �c��s� t� 14 -' -is Aerial photographs: Other: — Tcy..� t Wetland hydrology present? ye no Rationale for decision/Remarks: yv)f��lt,J %��r Ab rj "5 0�P SOILS Map Unit Name la,-. (Series & Phase) Taxonomv (sub Drainage Class Field observations confirm No I mapped type? 6F, Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match d(--scription) 0-1 1-0 Z Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma _< 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? ye no Rationale for IIdecision/Remarks: Lb ui L kvtD � .0-A vWAt e, �✓ ! Piv; �!n Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? no Hydric soils present? ye no Is the sampling point no Wetland hydrolo resent? e y no within a wetland. ? Rationale/Remarks: 41 ` �II }�✓eQ G✓V'At et t5 t,/;i�� ., t✓QT\""u� NOTES: �,�Q�ev Alf e- Revised 4/97 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 19R7 rnrns Wetland Delineation Manual) 'roject/Site: 5-----oa Date: it I S —/o y Applicant/owner: County: (k,i ✓LI State: "✓µ Investi ator s : r- ,t S/T/R: ZS" TZ�N /� �z Do Normal Circumstances exisf on the site? no Community ProIs ( the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes a Transect ID:�- /� ) Plot ID: � w �rtt��Gt Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes � Explanation of atypical or problern area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator a ✓' 1 ,�Q �-/L lid oc-C. z5 CornJS SP��G¢w S Ow HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC 3 =1 o a') 'Check all indicators that apply & explain below: I Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities —� Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ye 0 no Rationale for decision/Remarks: / /I I ° ✓1. / �S d o w., r.��Ir toy G� ylX J`o77G Sri IJ F�,�"ft�-' ° � , ..� I"„� S°�'r�� oG�, / I HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? (y)e no Water Marks: yes Sediment Deposits: yes o on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes Drainage Patterns: yes other (explain) l0 1 c , c c(4- I Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root (live rooms Local Soil Survey: yes eil- Channels <12 in. e FAC Neutral: no Water -stained Leaves yes Depth to free water in pit: b- inches Depth to saturated soil: / 1 t5 inches Check all that apply & explain below: Stream, Lake data: �Vo Other (explain): -F �afio eo";1-, 6 or gage r / yr-15) 'ire� / GQ Aerial photographs: Other: — c%c y0 / �S Wetland hydrology present? es no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ( I I %/bI�E'r'.ut1L- 54--Ge2 SOILS Ma Unit Name �a•�., Drainage Class�� p � vrJ � u (Series & Phase)-T� Field observations confirm Yes No Taxonomy sub ou OUP iL LAZIOx s mapped e? Profile Dpcerintion Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Mansell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. prof—ile moist) moist) (match description) toys-��z I$-t Z.sy y�z 7.SY1r- yl� Ma 1e`�� s" I 16a Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma <_ 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks Hydric soils present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: (.aw 61)..rov6ernA— �.+n.a.�'�c' w�j'��JS r.-ce��Ga. f%!/ 6��yG�✓'t�- �✓�'1S• Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? no Hydric soils present? yes no Wetland hydrology resent? no Is the sampling point ye no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: GC. i r (i1�.''t� �-i'� .cn.�� v� �'r , , I , L�Z- S ct-vn��i� I OGa �o ►1 1 1S WILH .' n Q.- / NOTES: Sys' fi� f o� Remised 4/97 DATA FORM I (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or I QR7 Cfhirnc WPflnnd indineation Manual) . roject/Site: 15 n h ✓rv/c _ yy L Date: /LI pplicant/owner: county: c� State: VVA . Investi ator s : I', o aw o Normal Circumstan es exist on the site? no _ S/T/R: �ZZ Community ID: Pe&f the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes <15 Transect ID: t C -z Plot ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes e? ��Bf x lanation of atypical or problem area: . VGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) ►ominant Plant Species. Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator J00- TCi.t,tli IYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: FAC Zk't001 % of dominants OBL, FACW, & :heck all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations J/ areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant cornmunities Technical Literature ✓ Other ex lain iydrophytic vegetation present? ye" no rationale for decision/Remarks: 3YDROLOGY Is it the growing season? Ye no Water Marks: yes nL> Sediment Deposits: yes o on 3ased on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes Drainage Patterns: yes Q other(explain) (opt G(,,. j'-J' Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes Channels <12 inCqe no FAC Neutral: e no Water -stained Leaves yeK!-r) )epth to free water in pit: inches Depth to saturated soil: inches heck all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: � t,'/Q "&('t 'd ;t,X 7�,Vrr�i�f ✓P � w.t r-b t 09 � SOILS. Map Unit Name tAmdh^a.,1', 1+ (Series & Phase) Taxonomy (su Drainage Class PO a A ,, Field observations confirm (Y5e No ------- —n Profile Description Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix color (Mansell Mottle colors (Munsell Mottle abundance size & contrast Texture, concretions, structure, etc. Drawing of soil profile moist) moist) (match description) U-I�Of f} lGyg�/�, `7.5yrz 3 Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) HistosolMatrix chroma <_ 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? � no Rationale for decision/Remarks: (, G yt,i� 7iti f"F.IL 6 f(' `1a.=L%-t{✓ i `PiS C2r r C- r r°`Cr4 7 ' r, C- 4r Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? no Hydric soils present? no Wetland hydrology resent? ye no Is the sampling point y no within a wetland? Ration arks: +ale/Rem r� 1 1 � CAP L4-Q.� li � " '''c1f� f t..C.�.s.... a C�vtii }�l,(.�. '�?P-I'�^•. `L' pN" � b �•�' Yx �.tl Y NOTES: Revised 4/97 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual Project/Site: S p(^) yr , 0 k— LA,) 1 + Date: I I q0 � Applicant/owner: County: State: Investi ator : s S/T/R: Tz lZ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ye no I Community I : P.'d Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes Transect ID: did„ , Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes o Plot ID: Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator ICo �� Serice� 5 3 0 �o VAO� HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: G�a % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature _1z' Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? es no Water Marks: yes n Sediment Deposits: yes Based on: soil temp (record temp ) on Drift Lines: yes Drainage Patterns: yes n� other (explain) (owl c, ,_,,te Jctc,- (� Dept. of inundation: — inches Oxidized Root (live roots Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in. es Depth to free water in pit: 7 +18inches FAC Neutral: yes �J Water -stained Leaves yes Rio Depth to saturated soil: 2inches Lt C/ Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: �SS�V` t.�' �•S+(% p4, ��rpil�...l{ C �Q �tih"� �Jr �pw� � .��fi c •,, � l�'c` + �— S°�\� SEALS Map Unit Name S (.t (Series & Phase) Taxonomv (subgroup) Drainage Class Pon r(w,j-M)'., e Field observations confirm es No I manned tvne7 Profile Description Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix color (Munsell moist) Mottle colors (Munsell moist) Mottle abundance size & contrast Texture, concretions, structure, etc. r Drawing of soil profile (match description) �- (0 r y Z �'�� l� � �1 L �� q6 �CI.t Kq� COMT'1D✓� Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma S 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Listed on NationaULocal Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks Hydric soils present? ye no Rationale for decision/Remarks: (, b or , -1 g L.o,, , zzo C S L a,j cl,,omk s p ,` 7 '^/ 't Pr e- je -c e o� v"tro' (-2 / Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present?ryes? no Hydric soils present? no Wetland hydrology resent? yes no Is the sampling point no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: I / `c c^ n , 5 �a t -f 0 ie ,� J r fi �� tiJ� (• •�. NOTES: f 0hte--X Revised 4/97 I DATA FORM I (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or t OQ'7 f'.,..,c Wo+!o„rl nohnaafinn Mnnnall 'roject/Site: vv Date: Applicant/owner: County: State: WA, Investi ator(s): Try r � t r.K �` S/T/R: Zf T Z �11 Do Normal Circumstan s exist on the site? es no Community ID: "( Ail Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes no Transect ID: e_ Z.��a Plot ID:� i Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes <:J_1� Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator S 50 FK'v FA v F,4 A! tvTC)S S S :j !� Ir4CLG1J HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: 3 3�0 OBL, FACW, & FAC A�- % of dominants Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities ✓ Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes ; no Rationale for decision/Remarks: yy. SL \��`,jCgGAc�J HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? (�e no Water Marks: yes Sediment Deposits: yes on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes Drainage Patterns: yes other (explain) o,�,( Dept. of inundation: _ n inches Oxidized Root (live roots Local Soil Survey: yes o Channels <12 in. yes Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes CT Water -stained Leaves yes Depth to saturated soil: 21i2 inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: _ Wetland hydrology present? yes Rationale for decision/Remarks: n h - o . , . 'C , < r-to r S 0 ond SOILS GI ,o U ►0� " Map Unit Name i'%Q i e, S, (A 1 _ Drainage Class Poarly I (Series & Phase) Field observations confirm Yes No Taxonomy (subgroup) T -F(v ma ed e? Profile Descriution Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match d(--scription) 6 — l(o+ A I a yR �2 /o yR Mpny, one, Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol ✓ Matrix chroma S 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain. in remarks Hydric soils present? es no Rationale for decision/Remarks: L.o 4v G•1'L. C6'rt/lAi moo: w-,2'Yi��C..'S L�+.'+(.� h4t!t:-�?� ''E"�_o(..�C�is CR- v.,,eCTi �=- Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes no Hydric soils present? 0 no Wetland hydrology resent? yes n— Is the sampling point yes no within a wetland? _ Rationale/Remarks: J� ,:gyp--,(�, <o, t � , NOTES: Revised 4/97 t DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Cor s Wetland Delineation Manual Project/Site: `� kjpop V \ 1n N �— L- J 15101 Applicant/owner. County: K, -)L State: LJY' Investi ator(s): S/T/R: Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ye nyt Community ID: Transect ID: — Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes n yes (, Plot ID: L W J Explanation of aty2ical.or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator 40 htnbN dA IWUVY 0101' i 'HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant cc,mmunities Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? es no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes no Water Marks: yes (nei Sediment Deposits: yes no Based on: soil temp (record temp ) on Drift Lines: yes Cn Drainage Patterns: yes Ana other ex lain 10 Gal LwatL Dept. of inundation: —' inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: y� no Channels <12 in. es n Depth to free water in pit: ALB inches FAC Neutral: e no Water -stained Leaves ye�l Depth to saturated soil: >i_IL inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: /� ACL Aerialphotographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? es no Rationale for decision/Remarks: 1 V, SOILS Map Unit Name u� i (Series & Phase) Taxonomv (sub Profile Description Drainage Class Field observations confirm yes No mapped type? Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix color (Munsell Mottle colors (Munsell Mottle abundance size & contrast Texture, concretions, structure, etc. Drawing of soil I profile moist) moist) (match description) 0- f L- Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma 5 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks Hydric soils presentl es no Rationale for decision/Remarks how V(, "'Ae5 -I- A;�C-A,e %7d1 v C- So �I rresec, c r Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? no Hydric soils present? no Wetland hydrology resent? es no Is the sampling point no within a wetland? Ration ale/Rer arks: �e�'..� / �� S �(�Ve7t ✓e NOTES: L VC h' Irk Zo Lie,+ "-f 0) s3_ Re-vised 4/97 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1 QR7 Cnr„c Wntlanrl nPlineation Manual) ?roject/Site: Srr-„- r-ask (Z'C%e� / Oyu -r G___ Date: ii kpplicant/owner: County: k-i State: Investi ator s : - Te ,aV\ S/T/R: Zfi Z3 N te -'16 Community ID: ��'ha ti� 7o Normal Circumstance 'xis on the site? no C _3 s the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes Transect ID: "`'V C' 3 A the area a potential Problem Area? yes io Plot ID: c—e-T Ex lanation of a ical or roblem area: �I 6fi Z-v VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator S zo �e c tJ bk) HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: OBL, FACW, & FAC 36 7s77s I % of dominants Check all indicators that apply & explain below: I Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature ✓ Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? es no Rationale for decision/Remarks: fJ � I HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? ye no Water Marks: yes Sediment Deposits: yes o I on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes SF Drainage Patterns: yes �e —7— other IDept. of inundation: -- inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes ►o Channels <12 in. yes $6 Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water -stained Leaves yes o Depth to saturated soil: inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial hoto ra hs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ((�� iv 6 , .-, S i r !k T o r- S r f x-ie4 e. i . SOILS Map Unit Name'�� (Series & Phase) sub Profile Description Drainage Class L-- l( Field observations confirm Yes l� Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) p -- t o y �.. �� '" 6t S L Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma <_ 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on Nationanocal Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks Hydric soils present? yes Rationale JS �-., for decision/Remar� / °Lo r Ga't" c k7'x - C' Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? y��a no Hydric soils present? yes 6P Wetland hydrology resent? yes Vlo Is the sampling point yes within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: � � i-itio ✓�j� w �'tl � ��c,.�lS �� '� °'�4�-F/►l�l / Lv��cti-�� j Q ° � S LC.,�.-d� It�.rG1tn61 o�7N i v�d f GIL�OI G�.`klgeva . TU�Q- SA"t-•Take- IDL.A' 6 ✓L 1'S l f� i-�/ 11-) NOTES: ZS Revised 4/97 DATA FORM 1(Revised) Routine Wetland I)`etermination (WA State Wetland Deli (eatio .. Manual or 1987 Corns Wetland Dekneation Manual) Project/Site: �pri h 9 b rco� — L/n D . Date: Applicant/owner: , .: _:; ' County: Kitj State: Investi ator(s): p % her, 6 A��owa ,t`eokom ., /� %>tLr�e� V /A S/T/R: P L Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? yes no Community ID: p5.5 Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes Sao Ttansect ID: tvL . p _ ! Is the area a potentjal Problem Afea? yes n4� _ P1ot,ID: Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb;-V:.= vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator ��.► a. $C-C T 4 S. �prn✓5 s,¢��GGh * �. �S. 4Z'C10✓ Typ6�c. 10.+��Ilw N !O Obi X pG��I�;�s 90. t,,J - Sdtc�„�w. ✓rL�,,,v,q,�a:. v �%CICe HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION'INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC_(Oo' Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature ✓ Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: I/etrea::1- 0 — "S G� o.� 1►� cc� PAC � y 1 t,19 ro I HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? es no Water Marks: yes no :- - Sediment Deposits: yes on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes other (explain) (o Uf w Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in. e no Depth to free water in pit: %16 inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water -stained Leaves yes �o Depth to saturated soil: 7 �, inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: _ Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: n r ate• ' ro 05 �/ e-^a' ! i c ct-t , �� G��7i / i r - 1 SOILS Map Unit Name PAC I (Series & Phase) Taxonomy (subgroup) -I' I v qe ad ;c, 4.2I c�,e v�� t S Profile nescriDtion Drainage Class Field observations confirm Yes No - mapped type? Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) 0-4 drgQtic (_9t /b y,25/2 . Al )/R fly clay Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma <_ 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? ye no Rationale for decision/Remarks: o w f`6w�LL ci ..dL P-p-f}I, Y\0 IM PJZ"r -f(%Q- i� L Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? es no Hydric soils present? yes no Is the sampling point es no Wetland hydrology resent? ye no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: 'f --1t, 6,5,_,p 1¢ c . b -v NOTES: Revised 4/97 DATA FORM 1YRevised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual ?roject/Site: Spr %�Y.Areok - Uni !i Date: kpplicant/owner: County: An n9 J g�%w M . �b°/�e� _ 4"� State: wA . S/T/R: T ry t� Investi ator s : )o Normal Circumstances exist on the site? n0;'>' Community ID: peek sthe site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes Transect ID: T:�)-� Is the area a potentipl Problem Area? yes - Plot.)D: '0/W #-2 Explanation of atyical or problern area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb"N: _=.vine) Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator �G/yyDrl�/i✓I hyd%Vl-an er t} .75. 09L 7- If /O 0 d L .1jic�ens cernUa /� 16 Fite wf are �-6und Al /O HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC 313 = I00'70 % of Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations ✓ areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? es no Rationale for decision/Remarks: o�-'t -j•�c-ate S a..,.-.� I�Qi � 1 n1 N �� h� �` -v G�', a ,,�.. � S d.o �`'`�� ►�i S i cQ/1, V � �-c�-EI o �., HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes no Water Marks: yes no . -:Sediment Deposits: yes no on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: a no other (explain) oc-J G Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in. a no FAC Neutral: yes no Water -stained Leaves yes no Depth to free water in pit: -ZL& inches Depth to saturated soil: /8 inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? ye no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Pof)(fked czrtal otefrfS'-Vor) w/gin 30 � 11 - :� s..a�� :.�riL4M.r�L... is _ _ �.. _ - SOILS Map Unit Name _Q'f s� ({N (u f 6a.w�, Drainage Class Poorlydim fwg:W (Series & Phase) x Field observations confirm No Taxonomy (subgroup) -fl u mapped e? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Mansell size & contrast- structure, etc, profile moist) moist) (maich description) 0-4 Organic rnanY, medluin� Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol ✓ Matrix chroma <_ 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? es no Rationale for decision/Remarks: n(J kno��,iL �Qn"f✓�¢� O`Zi iaOli vQ.�'1J�� I5 . Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? es no Hydric soils present? ye no Is the sampling point yes no Wetland hydrology resent? 6es no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: 3 NOTES: Re-vised 4/97 DATA FORM V.-(Revised) Routine Wetland *termination (WA State Wetland Deliqieatio:"-..-. anual or 1987 Corns Wetland De :'ad n Manual) Project/Site: Date: 10/ 1/ 4A Applicant/owner: County: ' State: WA Z 3 k..� KL -7 S/T/R: 34i Investigator(s): Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? yes r1o" Community ID: -p.(:o Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes Transect ID: far' 1, Is the area a p6tentjal'Problem Aiea? yes rio Plot,ID: /0/67� Explana ion of atypical or problem area: L '-e7d -% I VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb,"-'V->= vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator— Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator 90 CA C- 50 f,-Ic- VV 0 50 V\/ 7. F6 (.-j t cA, LA,%, Lo j HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION "INDICATORS: Q / % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC o 7. Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in PhysiologicaUreproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database ✓ Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature V, Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? (::j:es- � no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Water Mar Sediment Deposits: yes no Is it the growing season? (]Ee�� no Marks: de—S) no, on *ces (,,o1,6'1-V0011) Based on: Soil temp (record temp Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no other ex lain low CA -,,d-e- Dept. of inundation: 40— inches Oxidized Root (live roots) -FsD Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in.no Depth to free water in pit: ?'18 inches FA I C Neutral: yes no Water -stained Leaves yes no Depth to saturated soil: 7-A— inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs:. Other Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remark : SOILS Map Unit Name Pyr, (tom N0-, . Joao,,, (Series & Phase) l Taxonomy(subgroup) Profile Description Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix color (Munsell moist) Mottle colors (Munsell moist) Mottle abundance size & contrast Texture, concretions, structure, etc. Drawing of soil profile (match description) 6- la rf 16Y)e3/4 S py lOcrm. lv l- 6 /vyn 3/4 3 /0YR/l- R7" � e, �iy sets lam Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol ✓ .Matrix chroma <_ 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or, Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in reniarks� Hydric soils present? (Et> no Rationale for decision/Remarks: L6 w '� C•o r.`aL' cam.. .voiTl �Yts, cb r L 'Y..eCi GGL�1 ✓�. G� i�-yGr. J'✓Ci sv,' i 5 .. Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Y�K) no Hydric soils present? es no Wetland hydrology resent?e� no Is the sampling point yes no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: c� l 3 C r -t r c r ck- r- � � S nn e=1: � a..-., I 'G�i � a N ► C llJ, [ c,1-' �L. a-' w�' :1�,c..1. d' . NOTES: ,vrv#1e �, assvuukd "&I'zea root c- Aa_nnelr. Revised 4/97 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or I QR7 Cnrnc Wetland nelineation Manual) Project/Site: SPringbrook- Uni k a• Date: /b/z/o-/ Applicant/owner: �`lJ County: 16.,r State: WA Investi ator(s): ffo�%w M, Q�cl%n,Eo S/T/R: Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es no Community ID: P 5 S Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes Transect ID: ("C740--k l�-I P�Of Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes no) Plot ID: Explanation of atypical orproblem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum % cover Indicator D✓s L�-'r`uV%`�K�A�.�%S S �4 V we 0 �� A+r �• Gi+r..M 111A.:�i� -Fe HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDI/CATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC -tab w Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database i Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? es no Rationale for decision/Remarks: / r ��iY. ill�,.�Y f"g�R...sV e.J<,t�".t4 �.'�•n �/L,r G ✓4 iw '-i'�c.Q�.. (fir -2L6 C..�C7 Nn� l•'W.r-'�cr-.'" HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes no Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no 1 on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no other ex lain o,,,X Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in. es�> no FAC Neutral: yes no Water -stained Leaves yes no Depth to free water in pit: inches Depth to saturated soil: inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial hoto ra hs: Other: — Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: �. t 17 Map Unit Name 51' t tzf 0«l baw\ (Series & Phase) T Profile Description r r Drainage Class f?Cariy 9V>1-ak Field observations confirm �jYs No manned type? Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) 7.5�//Z �l� 61m1717'7, f'nc - med%N.y+l pprlwyn'f Si/�tJ. clay Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma <_ 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor re ally far^k Mg or Fe Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? es no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ..�. v, r „o-� + 'S + s✓� � i'GEt,'f/ v,�fi �J'� I.s�C1f"!.f, (� S0•(S. Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? es no Hydric soils present? ciCeD- no Wetland hydrology resent? e no Is the sampling point es no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: f� NOTES: Revised 4/97 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1997 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: S P r �� Date: ,pplicant/owner: County: k: State: �✓�' Invest i ator(s): ��, S/T/R: Z lV 2 Er Community ID: F-"Ta ►o Normal Circumstances exist on the site? yes no the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes n Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes no Plot ID: O_L ;x lanation of atypical or problern area: IEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) )ominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species_ Stratum % cover Indicator IHIn� �vt�f� .{-2�L ►�nhhn�ti��-� dC ^) ►,,i �f Cttn s Sbr,,er' �l7 �— " 'v\ 5 C. p 3YDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: I % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC 701e heck all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations database areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant — Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? y no Rationale for decision/Remarks: / HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? ye no Water Marks: yes Sediment Deposits: yes no on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes 19 Drainage Patterns: yes o other (explain) - (loca-1 L cFaa Dept. of inundation: hes Oxidized Root (live root Local Soil Survey: ye no Channels <12 in. yes no FAC Neutral: yes o Water -stained Leaves yes Depth to free water in pit: inches ---inches Depth to saturated soil: Check all that apply ex 1 & lain below: Oth (explain): Ptshc p ve Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: 01 ��,1 ��`� 5 , er `at� s,f .•r.'y.rl Se.S•„ Wetland hydrology present? es no (� Rationale for decision/Remarks: 14 c �� , fif Jrc� SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) Taxonomy (subgroub)' a Drainage Class P Field observations confirm yes No mapped type? Profile Description Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix color (Munsell moist) Mottle colors (Munsell moist) Mottle abundance size & contrast Texture, concretions, structure, etc. Drawing of soil profile (match description) o A, Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma 5 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remar - Lo,J Ck1 't9w.a a_� ✓noWt(" ite- LV'kLf Or� Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes no Hydric soils present? no Wetland hydrology resent? es no Is the sampling point yes no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: 5:}L 0e_ets h�� v•ieV;n e,�� 1lierlFb✓t i� �;+t:� � ✓��Lhl^d\ NOTES: 40'A bo' Lve OX56 Revised 4/97 1 Appendix C - Wetland Photographs s r N ` L I Al _ r ?-i 1+' %j 1 tA ;, .i .r V-"e- jv '►�� NOW 74W.-i "ems:" 1-, A-1 - eastern edge of A-1 - showing shrub community. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report 7 o partmant of TranaportaHon May 2005 C-1 A-1 - shrub community on eastern edge of A-1, second photo. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report T o Pa.tma iState naportatian May 2005 C-2 A-1 - drainage ditch in eastern portion of Wetland A-1, traversing west across wetland. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report 7 o:P::�l oat to r Trnnapo.lsllon May 2005 C-3 �;ir%i �WSSr��r��GG- I_'��,,.d+�. 4 A �• � vy►;^r � �.' ��1 III► T' A-1 - eastern edge of A-1- smal �;�,N► �,� �, 5 is �y� �� 4�� ;�^�, �' tea►�. ('OVA o ��' ��•'�Snn�ti !. We IAPJI.� VA UL ISM, tch. 0 A-1 - northern edge of A-1, ponded area with multi -stemmed willow. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report T =., !of;"a bn May 2005 C-4 A-1 -remnants of old culvert (non -operational). Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report Aft, a.•,�T �b� May 2005 C-5 13-1 - Polygonum-Typha community, looking west. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report 7v - M ;, s,t May 2005 C-6 B-1 - transition between emergent and forested communities. Idw Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report o, Transportation May 2005 C-7 B-1 - transitional area between Oakesdale mitigation site and B-1. B-1 - transitional area between Oakesdale mitigation site and Wetland B-1, second photo. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report T wi�R aof Tnroprlatbn May 2005 C-8 B-1 - Salix thicket. 'r I °. T ' ► AI p B-1 - small ditch into Polygonum community. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report 7WashingtonStat May 2005 of on C-g B-1- northern edge of wetland - plot 5. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report T w�;;� �;;;T�,,,p„t,t,a, May 2005 C-10 B-1 -culvert outfall area, overview. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report Depa.tmanl oiT Transportation May 2005 C-11 W-, 4, J� MA VQ > J- IL Ile, B-1 - outfall area of culvert on southern — PA-m% . ^ 4 B- I - southern culvert on southern edge of wetland. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report 7 =-of sftft TronopwftHon May 2005 C-12 r C-1 - facing west from Oakesdale Avenue. C-1 - forested community, facing west from Oakesdale. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report 7 ` :,,8,0t- ion May 2005 C-13 0 C-1 — wetland upland matrix area, facing north. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report MYW4* nirsisnt St t en.po.tatbn May 2005 C-14 1 t! C-2 — emergent community facing west. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report T attob� May 2005 C-15 C-1/C-2 — ditch facing north from access road. art i I �iJ AI 19.1 2il�Rl1y. n T7�aa �I,' C-1/C-3 — ditch facing south from access road. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report 7" ..' ��,st'T Mre.e.uo� May 2005 C-16 C-3 — facing south from uplands. "N �1 D-1 -forested community in Wetland D-1. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report ' * ,n�T �o� May 2005 C-17 D-1 - ponded area dominated by Polygonum. AWA Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report T Dop.h,-s-1 olT.naportalion May 2005 C-18 i r�P L ' �wr 4i AW' N! IN AkI& iFIX, 2 D-I - soil nit i P, '0 it community on eastern side of wetland. f 4 M!, ,.CAP, �� , `• _ �`i;i�,�•� tip,"�� 4 fj D- I culvert on western side of wetland. w Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report stake MIFF ==63 I of TransporUtIon May 2005 C-19 # I A -1-A D- I - culvert on western side of wetland showing steep slope from railroad. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report T W:.2.hI"*oO at to May 2005 C-20 D-1 - culvert outlet from western side of wetland from railroad grade. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report T D slon State of Transportation May 2005 C-21 Appendix D - Wetland Survey Maps Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report Dap.h.ln tstate anapo.lalbn May 2005 M M w M w w M M M M w r M w M M M r M a O N0N F^S SFR b KF "SSd "V .'F�K" gib >nN> Mm it Kx oy TIp�nN CQ �j �R � �>y�� w •.2A iRA d�•Ry Co' yob SSR 9, of m�Fi R � R "y' AH S mI g N RO 1p �l R K k m !'• O 2tt 9, •o PH IK �NIRV � tz 'Q� SS g9p� SR a""=qxA ti z A tJ> RA w N >y{( ICI zO$ZZ ) SW N 2 AV Iq 01 °��• Rb S O I••�IfS a ��txl P"uY°�Z�Vf N JAI 2 Q$N� RNaNa 1, KKz>}Qi$j�� N� � m>i Cpo>Cl(Klj{ppYpYf1{{O ~Nappj£-1 V �3 2 K N ° > N Ox Ay R uK � R � R� R � y4 -1° �� O-I •"i0 N Zi WHIM" �k�Kl yi Xtil i�i �>� R�Fmm q F-K i , i R a a m I � ig SMH ��`6� R " $ 4 �a z> �� F� fl R�� •g � A�Ng� R N ERR AliOf A lit O z R R Y ° O b, $8 Hz 3 �K N S •'AMIR V x�Am pp ZpZp ypyp�� j�a'ypo. �R NF§AAA _� ° F FRI> O� iN Q Ran 2 1On ° o.Y 88N +N, 1 N Rk °S > ogc q W em N�P? b m ':.Z. ?Pill R~[$ g $$'¢ 90 °F �Fpyp♦' oO8"$� >Ri�'z�n €�� mR, _o i$R�[� ° "$ 4 ioo K m 71 a�Y� No' o L " $ m PNg r P : N $A'- F v� eR OB E A �wi � � S n�K �.. ��^'�o�l^� NK �� ns+ F ��Km RzRdO °�•��> m >S�M•N q� K� �R R ay 4 +AIin uivy � � �•S �SY F$ �y � � $�^^t� �p"px nAz • F Y> � pA � Q �ymy,� 2i T R q ~l maµ4 � l fyl ONr-TSI j W2 p _N fj1VA�yNp zmm Nm � Fm `il yy�° YN}I 2r_ 2A el.>bb m >S Y•Nm ZA Y� `mNr Zw P�02' n�w� 'I' 4nmA m ��is"��,��RR y'aiF�oumm2c n AK �t I m oil, ROq� 2 q > F °AaN m >$ m yyim�i nFK^ mn �y>4 4m`o > ^Im ~SA N UR '��$oK[g Yx�Q FmioR�'�g �qxx R gR� �R > I?A� h ag In4 Rim F� A{ > � g R� a�xnN oA € N g �f>K{izy E R NAB $ m.�mmR� ° 'A $ • ��^r�^xR•m '� on ��:? K! SRN � p 4 g'g �, gKR4 �r�la>Q W£ � 7 R v mSRw� �^�y s$i$o g ��[ z o ) Y �i$" �R A R F_ SK R� NP ,Mg: > $�Anil na. egg mrioRi$m.� dK dym § ggmwi. avi gRPi ,N$ ,R E R i Aip ;R"Y "� m)w ma N ? �R � R � .� Aim w,' 6 g-Sw Ngg L£,y �K� �R RR R m �CN � > 7 g�R � � �K �K��'�� m3~ �1155 �1 � Sv� ��'��R'dN� '�K N,�`�55 y �i "'og�i��R " h�C�mm�•KQ � �i � F� m $ � �.. e M $� g )�R:�` Uq IN °[z � I $ �w$y� NB�tiR � � Nlano dio NI pp $� .��'��A� R-'•� gi�N��'`cR � RR �$ ��N ,o�g±�RF�N �. EF Rig$ �° A�SRKF y�z tzV ys+A R F Nk 1 > O N •` m I } >MF ~3 RZ■F�$ $RJR°xR [� KA�°R�E��<�aK��% $�NRa"�Rm L m O I> K �~ In 8 w ��"� b§��>K$�R"Ra �•`1 � �K.11 .. E S 1� A 2 = O ® El r N o � o ; 3 y m A m m m m m m m m m r m m m m �momo maxzm o�m a�� tiWCti3; ---- — �- _ 889va5��_ SW 27TH STREET 2 SSSOJ' 589'42`57T ct Cg 4"�� JP _ 457. 7J' S O N� j1 \y apt T �11 � IRe y �a J. WAS 1 Ain WIT Y its flow n p'pJ> SP � I� Nml p N m TY T o c m ySAO.I o _toy t oil m R Lqca � 1 ' t ... _ O l Ili. 07 _ ' 4QS v F was A �5 yak, �..I slid Z MOT &of ®.' o �4 /^ AIM IJQ b \ N � mV At N� OPAL SIN 44 I Q cp 40.0' 8`O • lsn JjQ v ;> �� g8 00 .4 42. N N ��2• t� .. ✓� N887447"w F 7 J99.8J' ' _ DSO Fi'7 Al SW 30TN ST (VAGATEDPJ a ri v T� A NOON �35 � N� aN �i Co e F U0 N IM o a ti a o I y�Cy; o A, ° SW 27TH STREET —� — B-909.99 S CB-NB4YB JO'W N 2 n r 11 L Syn 5 Sg NN z3 S'F;' m � > i m� o m I � o S NN I m I S l{ yyN O� m ;3 rn� s$ t L-114.BJ 6-7J"j l.B-104:i5'59"W IVy 1" 5 NN Ali .. 1 I I Iti Nr m a I I MR t'o m> m I t !1 Ism mo ? M1Q poF pWp VS bS {� W �+� mo tw to N— m 'f N^ii Na �` / mg VF W W �1 9 NN V n� ao 0 N nn "s� oil r 3 m I�� I r 1 tl�mltlqa 4Fm Nmi Af .. S"N Stl N'" µm �m tl3 w-a N ^ U tlo� o o a 1 SnN 4.N SP °se NN ON �� I ntl Nm A i tlOr N 4� I ;o + $m jt i Ona� Ay0 4 100*00, 11 3"94,11Z.99S W,�a� "I C3 (-104.Bs Upy2 2�� N N-1000 00 CBdBJ'55 i n 10 d=4J.00 26'S0" -S84 29 J2"E / w a b� c_ n� t'g IN_ I� rjb 0 I-�Tj amro lJ A IvN i Ip I I �UN i 2 Np r m 4� O, cj N b �.� uj QD uN \ N m e la� INN Imp �o R RNN Vy 250.00' 5o 0 o qN L+v NN 4N uw N F � mF m m m m m m m m m m = m = = = = m m m o o r a BOEING LONGACRES B.S.P. chi m m m (REF 10) ® i � a y I I RI pZZ, 0 S8756'5J'E Uy uti F Sn, �a m 40.0' v � n on N Imp tly4q'y Z. OA �w �o n`irn m ti cno nwi w `� ,g a>I ED a $g �mI m+ n � nFa s� 0 U) S'P � O eU oa �> Vg mq 1 —i C a m u>_ � 1 N> I TC b � Poi v�T N I v , I�T�iu h m n a �u i to N vR U'°CIO +Tv h ih t �� eV a D =' ; 1883.22' b _ 45.0' i Na `,%P2iOO+a I X 4 Y Y-X�SiV"42i7-r__x_-X-_Y_X__ UN o�y Nh N' 7 v 7 r o Ino2p o �m2 o � � BOEING L ONGACRES B. S. P. r � � 2 0 m 0 0 a (REF.10) r � b ��Cb a Um mo U — — 58756'SJ'E � I -< � Pg Z O aaiRnll y j N q3 S'9 N ••2 0� ° QQ !�- I g2 SW I 142 o 77 1*114 i'F yyzU QQ oa � gQJm �Um SP i U � a m 1rq�±Fl A Q d' YYt.. QQ i V� ti RV, R �Yy'Bu�' �N ir i.f, ,N W tw bN x Q (h Z f 75 3 ; & i 3, 5 .. +rw 51 i'lu 'faa }�+Ns"\,��NN C m z 2 � Tm 3 mn� iy Al 0 m 9 MATCH LINE BELOW RIGHT MATCH LINE ABOVE LEFT C y � y m g0 Zo U o �I O I� I e� rJ � 7izti= � ll AUK I � A^n 5 .. 4 QD In N H (v1p 3 ~—r � ti f�j ` SBBYS•JS E see7r1 se �. N uza rT— i SW 43RD STREET � ~C z WV N V1V01�,ZO 'r §I22% 22& oo® rn §7\\\ ® )R� w ; _s±. ± ± . % «0 ) � I ® � m \ 9 7 I � ± � $) 2 `S m m � % s § § � C 2 O g � � I $ � ® 9 « 2 $ / `2 « � i ( I JN / > §)|§} \ 9�# & 4q N87Gw In zu.~ C I / & � 4 ; ± ® � � 7 ƒ .@ ^ \ § 0) uj o $2E 4 ( 2 % §/ in i /�k 1 2 » I �q � m m§ \ Wl m■ � � ('Ap m(K�|