Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA77-037 maps /11\ PS I I • • BEGINNING • OF FILE . • ;FILE TITLE S P G I I P E N 1 T SP - O 7 - 7 7 /O( 8 5UNSLT 13LV . N• E . ' 4 ! pI NE 7 ;: z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 C) o) /3 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER L. RICK BEELER , 235 -2593 o44),. SEPZt�� May 9, 1977 Mr. Kip Ray Jardine RE: File No. SP-037-77 1068 Sunset Boulevard N.E. Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Jardine: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner 's report of April 25 , 1977 , has not ,been appealed within the time period set by ,ordinance, and therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Sinc ore die — L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner LRB:mp a\Q1112,13ki i cc: �W.anning Department co �l�Pr f, ✓City Clerk �n e�,k s co c �N r<{ ,0e cr l! AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Grant , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 25thday of April , 19 77 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. II Subscribed and sworn this 15 day of 19 11 . \\\ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: Kip Ray Jardine, SP-037-77 /z) Mt. Olivet Cemetery Co. , SP-034-77 (4) (The m%nute,6 contain a £ Lst (36 the panties 06 necond) C/7 Off' Va 7 �1 Misrg /9`7 y wii o/V\ ,% M �.y Ow��- ,v , Iv) '1 GE p/ [ V E M is 1<ip JA-R /iv 6 aiL77 WC • 6e-/7///N / d gPri1II,5 O 9 $?-05:5- um 22I977 �haN� 2-1%- 2 "2- S f�:yid a�a~N N\ y~•-- --._......�.�✓gyp,\ Li6� gg ?AM ‘9,e,t,q1\150 ',,.::' 7)-z-62.r. * ' 1((_ /7-0-1-197y `sc o 6 , ,_si _5_s'-C . -p < oVd yse/11 k. o 0- t( a9 id ri , 1N n < - k 0.1 >2- (01/ • / . pi oY al K Qk , 17 1,9 ' adodd . :Jo: g k // ). , ,2Vg. /y -i -tt/ 5 I 72--r it -y d 013 ) W d 0 Y11/ a d 3 y ? 9- 1'Ca�6i s Pi/ IfTi . ' ? U r1 " 9 7 skbr7d ai/c .' Pvfis- d,( / efv 4 t( pkv ?..s opik n T I w PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF APRIL 12 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : KIP RAY JARDINE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION Le ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended (RCW 43 . 216 ) , a Declaration of Non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal ( see. attached ) . This is based on provision of various developmental controls to mitigate potential impacts . ►M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and site map are attached . No AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Engineering Division 2 . City of Renton Utilities Division 3 . City of Renton Building Division 4. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department The above departments approved the applications . 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The site is presently zoned B- 1 business district . The pro- posed use is considered similar to a lumber yard which is allowed in the B- 1 zone by special permit , after public hear- ing thereon , and acceptance of the design and an examination of the location with a finding that such proposed use is in compliance with all provisions , regulations , and standards and will not be unduly detrimental to adjacent properties and enjoyment thereof . 2 . Minimum standards are also stipulated in the Zoning Ordinance . These include the requirement for an eight foot screening fence around the facility and a minimum 100 foot setback from any residential district. The applicant proposes a view obscuring fence , together with a 25 foot landscape buffer , in lieu of the 100 foot setback requirement. The applicant also proposes to utilize an earth-tone color and make a four foot cut in the elevation of the site , which will further reduce visual impact of the proposed structure and use . 'The Plan- ning Department has also received letters from the owners of the single family residences directly south of the subject site , which express acceptance of the project as proposed . These letters are attached to the staff report . It is the conclusion of the Planning Department that , if developed properly with the proposed setbacks and sufficient landscaping areas , together with certain amendments , the proposed project will not be detrimental to adjacent residential and commercial uses . 3 . Changes and amendments in the plans which are needed to reduce potential impacts and conform to ordinance requirements include : a . The eight foot screening fence is required around the entire site . b . Additional landscaping will be necessary along the public right-of-way in the proposed parking areas and along the westerly fence line . The southerly landscape area should also 'be continued to the proposed gate at the southwest corner of the site . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF APRIL 12 , 1977 ' PAGE FOUR RE : KIP RAY JARDINE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION 4 . The applicant had initially indicated that the proposed use would be temporary . However , the proposed improvements indi - cate a more permanent facility. It may be necessary to establish a time period for the special permit ,\ thereby allowing an opportunity for further review of the operation and extension of the permit . A reasonable time period would be three years . P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the special permit request with the setbacks and following conditions : 1 . Said approval shall be for a three year period from the date of the Examiner ' s decision . The permit may be extended for three years and for successive three-year intervals there- after upon review and determination by the Examiner that the operation is in compliance with all conditions of approval and applicable City ordinances and is not detrimental to adjacent properties . 2 . Final Planning Department approval of detailed landscape/ screening plans , including , but not limited to : a . Provision of an eight foot site obscuring wall or fence around the entire proposed operation . b. Additional landscaping as noted in red on the plans along Sunset Blvd . N . E . , within the proposed parking area , and along the westerly fence line . c . Continuation of southerly landscaping to the proposed gate at the southwest corner of the site . 3 . Final Planning Department approval of the building color and the proposed minimum four foot cut in site elevation . 4. All yard lighting must be properly shielded and directed to reduce glare and light intrusion onto adjacent properties . 5 . Large trucks or trailers shall not be stored on the subject site . 6 . Any outdoor storage shall be contained entirely within the screening fenced area of the site and shall not exceed a maximum of ten feet in height . 7 . Suitable ingress/egress and circulation control shall be pro- vided per the Parking and Loading Ordinance along Sunset Blvd . N . E . , including , but not limited to , proper driveway widths and locations , landscaping , and curbing . 8 . Public Works Department approval of drainage plans with suit- able on-site retention and oil water separation facilities . ,. .. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT APR 1 21977 PM PRELIMINARY REPORT TO. HEARING EXAMINER1R,9o10,11112,11213,4+516 PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 12 , 1977 APPLICANT: KIP RAY JARDINE XHIBIT �' o FILE NO : SP-037-77 , SPECIAL PERMIT, A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST Applicant requests special permit for location of a retail sales business similar to a lumber yard within a B-1 zone . Proposed use would consist of sales and storage of construction and roof- ing supplies . B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record : KIP RAY JARDINE 2 . Applicant : KIP RAY JARDINE 3 . Location : Property located at 1068 Sunset Blvd . N . E . 4 . Legal Description : Detailed legal description available on file in Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property : Approximately 1 . 6 acres . 6 , Access : Via Sunset Blvd . N . E . 7 . Existing Zone ; B-1 Business District 8 . Existing Zoning B-1 Business District , R-3 Multi -family i'n Area : Residence District ; R-1 Single Family Residence District . 9 . Comprehensive Medium and Low Density Multiple Family Land Use Plan : Residential . 10 . Noti.fication : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: To allow location of a construction supply sales facility within a B-1 Business District . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The site has been zoned B-1 since the original zoning map was pre- pared in the early . 1950 ' s . The site has been utilized for single family residential purposes for many years . There is an existing single family residence located on the site , which will also be used for office purposes related to the subject proposal . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The site is relatively level . However , the site gently slopes from the southeast corner towards Sunset Blvd . N . E . creating a difference in elevation of approximately three or four feet. 2 . Soils : Ragnar (RdC ) , well drained , gently sloping , utilized for timber and urban development . N ` PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF APRIL 12 , 1977 PAGE TWO RE : KIP RAY JARDINE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION 3 . Vegetation : Lawn and scrub grass with fruit trees and other evergreen and deciduous trees scattered throughout the site . 4 . Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site may provide, some habitat for birds and small mammals native to the area .. 5 . Water : Surface water and streams are not apparent on the site . 6 . Land Use : A single family residence exists on the subject site . Single family residences are located immediately south and east of the property , and an apartment building is situated south and west of the site . Various commercial uses are located to the west along Sunset Blvd . N . E . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area consists of a combination of small businesses , apartment buildings , and single family residences . G . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 , Water and Sewer : An 8" water main , an 8" sanitary sewer main , and an 18" storm sewer main exist along Sunset Blvd . N . E . Water and sewer service is available upon payment of fees and a $ , O1 per square foot for water and a $ . O1 per square foot for sewer connection charges . 2 . Fire Protection : Fire Department review comments included the requirement that a fire hydrant be located within 165 feet with no portion of the building being over 300 feet from the hydrant . A new hydrant leading from the main shall be on an 8 inch line . Fire flow requirement is 1750 gallons per minute . The subject building and business shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Fire Code Article 21 covering lumber yards . If material to be stocked in the building is over 15 feet in height , the building shall be sprinkled . A new hydrant , to be more cen- trally located , is required as indicated on the plans . 3 . Transit : Metro Route No . 107 operates along Sunset Blvd . N . E . approximately one-fourth mile south of the subject site . 4 . Schools : The site is located within the Renton School District. 5 , Parks : Not applicable . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . 4-711A (7 ) , Business District , Lumber Yards , Fuel Yards , etc . 2 . Chapter 22 , Parking and Loading . I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 , Land Use Report , 1965 , Objectives , Pages 17 and 18 . J . IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS : The impacts that may occur as the result of development can be miti - gated through proper drainage control , setbacks and visual screening , landscaping , and other development controls . K, SOCIAL IMPACTS: Not applicable . SP-037-77 Page Five 2 . Final Planning Department approval of the building color and the proposed minimum four foot cut in site elevation. 3. All yard lighting must be properly shielded and directed to reduce glare and light intrusion onto adjacent properties. 4. Any outdoor storage shall be contained entirely within the • screening fenced area of the site and shall not exceed a maximum height that is so stipulated by the height of an existing adjacent screening fence. 5. Suitable ingress/egress and circulation control shall be provided per the Parking and Loading Ordinance along Sunset Blvd. N.E. , including but not limited to proper driveway widths and locations, landscaping, and curbing. 6. Recommendations as stipulated by the Public Works Department , Traffic Engineering Division, and Fire Department providing the screening fence is extended around the entire storage area of the property. This screening fence may extend to a height of 12 feet upon option of the property owner and, as a clarification, subject to the overnight parking of no more than three trucks or four vehicles that may be described as heavy equipment., 7. Public Works Department approval of drainage plans with suitable on-site retention and oil water separation facilities. ORDERED THIS 22nd day of April, 1977 . Ahrme a- � • s L. ag- `-a•t/'F nd Use Hea ing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of April , 1977 'y an Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Kip Ray Jardine TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of April , 1977 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3071 , Section 4-3015, request for reconsideration or notice of appeal must be filed in writing on or before May 6, 1977. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedures, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date of the Examiner' s written decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. SP-037-77 Page Three The Examiner inquired about public access to the proposed circular driveway leading to the sales office. Mr. Jardine indicated that one- way traffic flow would be required and the driveway would be restricted from public access. The Examiner asked the applicant to estimate a maximum number of vehicles which would be parked on the site at one time. Mr. Jardine indicated his reluctance to impose a limit because of possible future expansion. The Examiner indicated that because storage of heavy equipment is prohibited by the city, a maximum number must be established, and asked Mr. Jardine if, as an example, no more than ten vehicles would be a reasonable figure. Mr. Jardine responded that though the number would most likely be excessive, he accepted that figure. The Examiner asked for further comments . Since there were none, the hearing on Item #SP-037-77 was closed by the Examiner at 9 :00 p.m. • FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS : Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS : 1. The intent of the application is to request a special permit to locate a retail sales business in a B-1 zone which has the characteristics of a lumber yard. The proposed use is to consist of sales and storage of construction and roofing supplies. 2 . It is the opinion of the Planning Department that the proposed use can be considered acceptable in a B-1 zone by the issuance of a ' special permit. 3. The existing zoning of the subject property is B-1. Section 4-711 , as amended, states that lumber yards are allowed by special permit • with the finding that the use will not be unduly detrimental to adjacent surrounding properties and enjoyment thereof , provided that when established they shall be surrounded by an eight foot solid. wall or sight-obscuring fence herein known as a structure and the yard regulations of this district shall be observed and provided further that no such lumber yard shall be maintained closer than 100 feet to the sideline of the residential districts. Therefore, an approval of this request would be conditioned on the acceptance of this use and the granting of a variance from the required setback by the Board of Adjustment. 4 . A single family residence exists on the subject site which will be converted to an office use and will be an extension of the commercial use intended for the property. Single family residences are located immediately south and east of the property and an apartment building is situated southwest of the site. The property primarily fronts Sunset Boulevard N.E. with uses located to the west of Sunset Boulevard that consist of a variety of commercial enterprises. Adequate utility lines exist on Sunset Boulevard N.E. 5. Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance, Gordon • Y. Ericksen, responsible official, has issued a Declaration of Non-Significance for the subject proposal. This is based on provisions of various developmental controls to mitigate potential impact. 6. The applicant, Mr. Kip Jardine, stated that he has received the . . staff report, concurs with the staff recommendations with the exception of Items #P-1, P-5, and P-6 . 7. The applicant stated that there is an occasional need to park delivery trucks on an overnight basis primarily during the weekends when qualified personnel are unavailable to unload material. Upon inquiry by the Examiner, the applicant could not state the maximum number of vehicles which would be parked at one given time. • • SP-037-77 Page Four 8. It is of concern to the Hearing Examiner that the storage of a large number of commercial trucks could be construed to consist of a storage area for heavy equipment, which is prohibited in a commercial zone and is limited to industrial areas. • 9. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, findings of fact, applicable' policies and provisions and departmental recommendationsi in this matter, and this report itself, being uncontested, is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as is set forth in full herein. CONCLUSIONS : • • 1. It appears that the intended use and .storage of construction materials is similar to a lumber yard, which is allowed by special permit in , a B-1 zone. 2. The B-1 Ordinance specifiesithat :a .minimfum setback of 100 feet • must be maintained from residential districts. At this time, the ' Hearing Examiner does not have the jurisdictional authority to grant an exception from this setback. This authority is currently designated to. the Board Of 'Adjustment. This is an example of the need to combine rezones, special permits and variances under one authority to save applicants and staff needless steps. Therefore, approval of this application is subject to submittal of a variance request to the Board of Adjustment to modify the setback from the required 100 feet .to a proposed 25 foot setback. 3. The proposed use as illustrated. on Exhibit #3 appears to be compatible with the surrounding " area subject to . the provision of ample screening and landscaping to buffer the adjacent residential areas. 4. In viewing the site, the storage of miscellaneous materials such as pallets of roofing material seem to be significantly higher than an intended 8 foot screening fence. The height of the material that was viewed by the Hearing Examiner appeared to be in excess of 20 feet. This .material was very apparent when viewed from adjacent residential properties and is not considered ' compatible with these uses. . Therefore, the storage of material in the storage areas should not exceed the height of the proposed screening fence. 5. This use should not be considered as a type of facility that requires the storage of a: large number of trucks normally considered • by ordinance as heavy equipment storage on a regular basis. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the special 'permit request with the following conditions: 1. Final Planning Department approval of detailed landscape/screening plans , including, but not limited to: . a. Provision of a twelve, foot,. sight obscuring wall or fence • around the entire proposed operation. b. Additional landscaping as noted in red on the plans along Sunset Blvd. N.E. , within, 'the proposed parking .area, and along the westerly fence line. c. Continuation of southerly; landscaping to the proposed gate at the southwest corner oi...the site. M : April 25 , 1977 OFFICE OF THE 'LAND'.USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. APPLICANT: Kip Ray Jardine FILE NO. SP-037-77 LOCATION: Property located at 1068 Sunset Blvd. N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests special permit for location of a retail sales business similar to a lumber yard within a B-1 zone. Proposed use would consist of sales and storage of construction and roofing supplies. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Recommend approval with RECOMMENDATION: setbacks and conditions. Hearing Examiner : Recommend 'approval with a conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received REPORT: by the Examiner on April 5, 1977 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report , examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding areas, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on April 12 , 1977 , at 8 :20 p.m. in the 4th floor conference room of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2 : General Plat Plat with Site Configuration. Exhibit #3 : Detailed Site Plan with ' Landscaping, Parking and Screening. Exhibit . #4A: Elevation Drawings Exhibit #4B: Foundation Plan In response to the Examiner' s inquiry regarding the zoning of the area, Mr. Smith reported that the site had been zoned B-1 for a number of years. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith to read city departmental recommendations on the application into the record. Mr. Smith read responses from Utilities/Public Works Department, Engineering Design Division, Traffic Engineering, and Fire Department into the record. He also reported that an environmental checklist has been submitted. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith if he were aware of other departmental recommendations when the staff report was finalized and if modifications on the report would be required. Mr. Smith responded that he was not in receipt of the comments at that time and revisions would be made in regard to • SP-037-77 Page Two drainage and fire department recommendations. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith to define ingress and egress for the subject property on the site map. Mr. Smith reported that edges of the pavement and the entrance to the parking area would be clearly defined including incorporation of landscaped islands at the ends of the stalls. In response to the Examiner' s inquiry regarding . ownership of the adjacent property, Mr. Smith reported that a commercial building adjacent to the site is under separate ownership. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith if he had additional information to enter at that time. Mr. Smith indicated that comments of the Engineering Division regarding traffic and circulation in relation to Sunset Boulevard would be incorporated into the report. The Examiner asked Mr. Jardine if he concurred in- the staff report. Responding was: Kip Ray Jardine 1068 Sunset Blvd. N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Jardine indicated his concurrence with the exception of Item #P. 1. of Exhibit #1, which recommends approval of a permit for a three year period and successive three year periods thereafter. Mr. Smith responded that he had reviewed the proposal with respect to the relationship to the surrounding area which is in a transitional state and felt periodic review should be stipulated. Mr. Jardine noted that the business was being established on a permanent rather than temporary basis with considerable expense involved in landscaping. The Examiner indicated that the nature of a special permit allows uses that are not normally allowed in a certain zone to make the subject use compatible with the surrounding properties. Mr. Jardine inquired about the possibility of elimination of review of requirements if conditions continued to be met., The Examiner stated that conditions could not be more restrictive at a later date than were imposed on the original request. Mr. Jardine inquired about Item #P. 5. of Exhibit #1 regarding the storage of large trucks or trailers on the property, and reported that large delivery trucks were parked on the property overnight and on weekends on occasions. He expressed the desire to eliminate the restriction on this item because of the lack of rail service to the site. Mr. Smith responded that vehicles which were utilized as part of the business operation were not subject to the restriction, but restrictions would be imposed on storage of other vehicles. The Examiner reported that violations of the Parking and Loading Ordinance would be reported to the city. !, Mr. Jardine questioned Item #P. 6. which imposes a height limit on outdoor stored material, noted that most material is processed in four foot increments , and requested the limit be increased to 12 feet. Mr. Smith reported that the Bulk Storage Ordinance allows a maximum of 25% over the existing height of the eight foot fence, setting the restriction at ten feet. The Examiner asked for further testimony in favor of the application. There was no response. The Examiner asked for testimony in opposition to the application. There was no response. The Examiner indicated his concern regarding height of stored material with relationship to visual impact from the street and inquired about • a site obscuring screening fence. Mr. Smith reported that an eight foot screening fence would be installed around the entire site and would reduce visual impact of the operation. • 1 • II 1 • 1 I I • 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 I ,Ii . 7y/ y 1 �j / I .2'1G 1 i / • ,,_,,,..77-,-,;,,,.,-.7. i • . 1 I 1 -r-•Si 7U e.4 ,•_/-27 .:>2.2-`7,%,. . . I 1 .�' )�->>3l >2- .''3,�,� �,..7J/ 1 1 2 .;7/)i :) .. +'�-- `/"7•;-•''tZ7'Z/1j' '- .,• ";`L;.% r—..r—i3-"J,J^ i T• ?) 1.1 I r--),.2....,;;;=-, ,- ::::2_,?-,:e...--__•:z--C...>,7-- -'3.--442.-.?..-/r-• r:"."-,2-e.) I 1 1 1 1 ,j t 7 f/ �)/tt/i-,� ;� I • %i J \ vvf-1 1 I -) ,ii:•(,,2,2) ''...,2" ) ''74-?;?-; .kA's I • •---,-'-:1• 9--,',, ,,:-7-,,y 4 7. -:6-,?.24.9,2 1. / ,L 1 /.. . . 1 . . I I • I ' • 1I 292 zes VT1 244 I 251 244 ir z1U , zoe •';'1 I' � ,• , . j2 u f1 Qe y � t h • ■ .r . _ , 1y a -,' . r . , ..__ , i . • 1 •• • .: : _ Ea (Aim,12A ' . IOW tla I,I zsl zea zTo zas �, zo1•�.1�I41�p 214 09 a �' _1 I :z� �� o � • •..r _ I • . \ zo_ NE 1bTM. • T. .--TT - r ••.•',� .. rt " a , • IV t . n \ ,. „ i. 10_ .4,.4 ' rdS ',. „.,,ti,,,..1.41 is • �'L '3 ' 24(a j 231 228 2Y9 210 ° y •4 1.1f: •' I _ 46 i `47•.Y41 O •. ), ,� i K I M"` KIP RAY JARDINE '— • ' R. - MI ,*' •t o Ze SPECIAL PERMIT .__= .i Z50- 429 in � Z11 .'t, a= J .. �'' : ea A f —t �µ T 1 1 1 — ' �� _ .- n'z+ - tf '—4 . 1 l j I + 1 �,+�?o is .:is . • I _ 1 I �� . I 00 � Jill) r' r 43 Nsimmalad �i=-II3• • `i A . °aid �� 'i Lill '• { i 7 a° ,: hi, o�aKe Iv r za ' • .i•Weg,-.-,.-___ NI E ilt. ., . _ - if.,;;), 1 ., .. ,, . ,, ..,.. .,:,,.. , i ,f, - -; ;I. !_i . . \ V \i\ ,.. . :* •fr- , '":-, "7i.• • • ; '.' ill\\,F3- eili;DEij .. °'.4'. Al'44:/6,:z 11"pli !...,41•13 \ .\ • ...,k. , ,, ,.. _ l 4 ) '''* 2 U . ,, 1 .i.1,.1"1..LLL1•.i..� v� � .1 y . . .‘t \ 15/C, \-, ` ‘.r Q �+ N r . . e f' •� - -n 33 92 °•++ ,1 ' h.......o.1?1 +{• \` \ ' . �r�r : ri7vIti,i1114, .1 _ Y �. . z1• � , — -.�•1{ T \1 • ,ys' a I1 L�•i•�. `o 'u S°r':of _•1'r . r-- . ' 741. • :4 . 2 ---,rile!, .Ili .'-.., -' I mouN-4,,,A LI Etii ....."-8"1- ". ---1-1 1 .!... : : •-1 1, / damn •• )t' IN 1 1 •• • a •_4 y/ l S . . ff. 4. ..',•4, I rt4 ; 1::; .: , ;' r.-•, , • ! 44 _ . 1 ' '-. ' AW,V14 71,MN010 1 '°J-'1''i.., ' , Z' °41; ill 1 i - IN a 1 1. + \\ ma_ _ S g 0p� _'t:‘1....rif t�, � — � /. J ._,.. e.. !,, [ 1 i , 1 • SPECIAL PERMIT: KIP RAY JARDINE; Appl. SP-037-77; special permit for location of a retail sales business similar to a •lumber yard in' a B-1 zone; property' located at 1068 Sunset Blvd. N.E . APPLICANT Kip Ray Jardine TOTAL AREA 1.6 Acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Sunset Blvd. N.E. ' EXISTING ZONING B-1 Business District EXISTING USE Undeveloped ' PROPOSED .USE Construction of a supply sales facility. COMPREHENSIVE LAND .USE PLAN Medium density multi-family • COMMENTS 1 • ov. t. iz r, 5r. DLjDDUjJ0: to• it nbo 4,6 _ 1 go ' d m , , p z 6 ER i , -. ' 0 „43 a►rv -3 teo ..ff&& ay. • ,..,0 1 . , 1 • 1.0prf?Pi :, q0-Cr NpRrtt Ji. 0016 "`� '‘'. 0E1 . p1 00 �V FY • 0144 i .. .P " i , e n • o _ h �� •f �o..' '::.,:,,:''': :: - a . �] • 47 I, wit , , ,„„ rniu" 113 . 62i BE R44, Mt. l0rN PI.. . , * c-A : . IQ ., satig 43 repo eni01 1 ;111 %I Its. . 1i1 . ❑ n N E. /O rN 76. • _ JR-3 . • �1 K aZI[cf ci Q b 0 t N.E. /O.rti Sr. V If-1rh7 ). .' I as Oa 9 Camm , o 0• 7100r cE , c� k4/71 n . Q - w ,30 , . . r : jDjjQ(0J / a h LI . o. se. 9rW ?L-. • . II gi"q ell? 0 0 cp o? Ci 01 cO U jVaJEcf tic ism KIP my J/FRDiNr • • iNICIA4. 7fLiiir * $P-037-77 f PROPOSED/FINAL DCi.LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/,W.1-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SP-037-77 ❑ PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-232-770 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant requests special permit for location of a retail_. sales business similar to a lumber .yard within a B-1 zone . Pro- posed use would consist of sales and storage of construction and roofing supplies . Proponent KIP RAY JARDINE Location of Proposal 1068 Sunset Blvd . N . E . Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to ❑ have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma a after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . ' Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : ' Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Plann ' ,, , D . ecto / Date April 5 , 1977 Signature ✓,d./4 .. City of Renton 0111r , Planning Department 5-76 'i °- -- 'e'""'-__•yam. CITY OF RENTON O , cob APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT . c) .�Q�� a MAR 16 19?T FOR OFFICE USE ONLY r40 A - ------ 4 "/ File No . SP- ty 37-17 Fee $15 �'NG DEpP / 'Date Rec'd -/<• 77' Receipt No. 76' APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name k1',0 (< y J iJi 7i1Ur Phone - 2 E- SO 0j Address /(06 r t,rr\J5f-r Q (.. r' • ( :k \,1 , LUTA 5�J I 12. Property location 1068 C,u,to, T e( _ 71. i . (;' \JTob.1 . 111 tS 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) 4. Number of acres or sq. ft. 5cc. 477- A-0/-1,90 Present zoning -8— 5. Wh5t do you propose to develop on this property? Pc771-1(. S 4c C rs<d.s;/!Ui'S ) tuILA1E- ToCA9M YZ- )'/Aw N .A)� Li. A 5AI.i= 0F' WALL0,6A4.0) ' ,rlaY/i M/V1=tti4L� A►JI) r9171/4-4EL (Alttrpt,v/r l)12?t tE4 6. The following information shall be submitted with this application: Scale A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , existing structures, easements , and other factors limiting development) . . . . . . . 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan . . 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' - 800 '' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) E • A special permit required by the Renton Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307 . 5 in addition to the above . 7. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Date approved Date denied Date appealed Appeal action Remarks Planning Dept . 2-73 revised 1- 74 of. RN O ' " CITY OF RENTON/ WASHINGTON e Q��y'�D' �L 4" ': ENVIRONMENTAL:CHECKLIST FORM •• ' ' r AR i'e 1917 . • `!bjNG DCPP FOR' OFFICE U E ONLY . • - Application lo. S/I37- 79' • Environmenta Checklist No. .t e/ ?3 -T p . PROPOSED, dalIe: ' FINAL, date:- . Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance ' II Declara• tion of Non-Significance'.'`,.` r Declaration of Non-Significance • :D C] , , ' COMMENTS: • , ' , :: In'troduction The State_ Environmental Policy Act of 1971. Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires "a1.T.::s.tate:and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their . _'own; 'actions and when licensing private proposals. The'Act also requires that an EIS be '.,prepared forall major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose Of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a ▪ proposal ; is uch a major action. ' , ;01ease..answer•- the following questions;'as completely as you can with the . information . ▪ "presently• available'to you. , Where explanations -of your answers are required, or' where '4:40u` believe .en explanation. would. be. helpful to government decision makers , include your ex'pJanationAn. the space:provided, or'use additional pages if necessary'. . You should . i r incllude*:-references-,to :any reports or. studies of which you are aware and which are rele- .:'.v'ant..to: the answers,you.,provide. Complete'.answers to these questions now will help all . ;. a'-agen cies.',involved"with;your;.proposal'.toiunde;rtake the required environmental review with- . ; out=un'necessa'ry' delay. The following, questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which ' you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. ; 'NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington' for various types of proposals,. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal!,. If a question does not apply', just answer it "no" and continue on to the . next questionj. I 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM , I . BACKGROND t_ 1. Na` a of Proponent /� 'f )y' 4/g%'griv/E 2. Ad ress and phone number of Proponent: /p �-y /661 SLcIOS�'7 PJL• i -t:. n?,Ad �• JJ . J'7 jo,- s- i • 3. Da e Checklist submitted .07F-- 9 2 , O91:✓6 4. I Ag ncy requiring Checklist (_ (71V' CIF �h,u '6/0 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: , . ( . cu PPOI 1 6. , Na ure and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its si e, general design elements ; and other factors that will give an accurate un erstanding of its scope and nature) : • f W ril,la- ,, "Lc �A(I(dIdZ. TO 1-()F-(36V, 1/Aw. ' INGLV.S Gv.Q.i.g (gp poFiq,` A#Ja IQ�1d 4C kpbvlr Syc -151, . I _ • -2- 7. ' Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , ,as well as the extent of the land' area' affected: by any .environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- Mental 'setting of the proposal) : 4-7774C( c d . . . 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : .rf"t6 i , • /171 . ' 9. List of all permits, licenses or (government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local--including rezones) : V s C..DI NV•(i- 'Pe ��k) 10. ' Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity . related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain:. R.1©T,-4r: Pd. -.'cA-r "i"hL4E • 11. : Do .you know of any plans by others which may affect the' property covered by ' ' your•,•proposal? , If yes,.=explain: . • . • _ ' Attach •any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-. • posal ; if none has been. completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the .nature "of .such ,application form: • II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ' , (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal' result ' in: . (a) Unstable earth 'conditions, or in changes in geologic ' / , substructures? V FED NO (b) Disruptions', displacements ,' compaction or over- j covering of the soil? 1 :.. YES MAYBE NO (c) i Change in topography' or ground surface relief features? ' YES MAYBE NU— { (d) The destruction, • covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? ief 1 MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water ',erosion of soils, either on or off the site? Y S MAYBE NO . (f) Changes .in deposition or erosi,on' 'of beach sands, or ' ' changes in siltation'. deposition or.•erosion which ' may modify the channel of 'a river or 'stream or the' ' 4 bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: '. m zre0C•. Odell ' !r S� p� �' .� v,�'�=�� ' ram'� c.. �, • • • • • -3- ' (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) , Air emissions' or deterioration of ambient air ' Z 'r- . quality? ' . YES 'ITATTE NO. (b) The creation of objectionable odors? TEB MAYBE NO ' ' • . (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, • or any change in climate., either locally or regionally? • . ' , Z. ' YES • MAYBE NO , Ex lanation: 1 , . . (3), Water. Will the proposal result in: (a, Changes in currents, .or the course of direction of ' / . water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? • �. YES MBE NO (b Changes in absorpti'on :ra'tes; drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? �/ ' ' ' YET— MAYBE N� (c Alterations to the course, or' flow of flood waters? _ WIFE E NO , ' (di Change in the amount of surface water in any water ' body? ' , . • : v ' . YES •• MAYBE NO i � ' (e Discharge into surface waters,, or in .any alteration" • . . surface water quality, including but not limited to / • temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ' YET— MAYBE Vim' . (f) Alteration of the' direct,ion or rate of flow of ' ground waters? YES MAA BE NO (g) Change in the quantity, of ground waters , either ' through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES AIEYBE NO (h) Deterioration in `'ground water quality, either through direct injection, or thrOughl the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances iniolthe ground waters? Z. l YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? , I TM MAYBE N ( • Exlanation: .a1G-)© 45 , r i/ c544.7 /J4 :-1 ';'t l , S U"-so #1C /0U !.1,1 // A < G O of�Gt 0 (4) Flcra. Will the proposal result in: I (a1 Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? V 1 YES MAYBE P— (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? ' YES' MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora .into an .area,. or , in a barrier to 'the normal replenishment of existing ' species? 1 I ' YES A B ME NO (d) Reduction in. acreage of any agricultural crop? ' �° . , EES WEE NO- Ex d lanation: Qly/r1l r ' j c.,6,1 ,„1,45, J'p!, A 41 d:., :44,4247.''.7-m K,A, cl, ` e'N/ ".'7 :a ,� - c'P 'r_ . t,," $ .✓ . a -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish,' benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? , YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO , (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO ' (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Ya— MAYBE NO Explanation: • 46) Noise. Will the proposal increaselexisting noise levels? w✓ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: /6,;/15(„e:. �I7l�,c��./�'�` A14/1✓✓/pf/d /N al3 ionAY,.0 /7°'� Q,� ;ail/y�., p�.v ,�..r/11.4 .A'&4.2/,M 44,7 ...44/ ✓CA,. .. ' r (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? DES :WRY N‘(/' Explanation: Wi ll) Land Use. W it the proposal result in the •alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YET--- MAYBE NO Explanation: (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use ofl any natural resources? YES MAYBENO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? DES— MAYBE NO Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? EPOS- MAYBE N Explanation: 1 L • ! I , II . . -5- ' (12) H using. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or . , , c eate a demand for additional housing? iefi YES MAYBE NO. .' Explanation: ' (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in': ( ) Generation of additional 'vehicular movement? (t ) Effects on existingYES M YBE NO parking facilities, or demand ' for new parking? , ✓ YES Wirt- NO • (c') Impact upon existing transportation systems? . 1 YE M BE NO 1 I (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or ' ( movement of people and/or goods? ! YET— MAYBE NO . 1 (e;) Alterations to waterborne, nail or air 'traffic? ' I YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor. vehicles, , 1 bicyclists or pedestrians? YES. MAYBE NO E'x!planation: . ' , ' (14) ! Public Services. Will•. the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for 'new or alter'ed `governmental services ' in any of the following areas,: , (a) Fire protection? ' .je: i ' YES M NO (b) Police protection? to/ YESMAYBE NO (c) Schools? • YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational . facilities? � �' YES MAYBE NO • (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? JZ YES MAYBE NO • (f) Other governmental services? _IZ • . S M Y E No Explanation: • (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: • (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? • , YES NO (b Demand upon existing sources of energy, or requite. 1111,, the development of new sources of energy? YE- MAYBE dr Explanation: . 6 (16) Utilities. Will the proposal 'result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: I (a) Power or natural gas? i ✓ • YES RWYWE NU— ' (b Communications systems? to,' YES MAYBE NO I (c) Water? , . _ YES MAYBE NO J . -6- . (d) Sewer or septic tanks?' I YES -MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? . 1 ,. r ' YES MAYBE NO • . (f) Solid waste •and disposal? , • • �� `,/� YES MAYBE NO p. Explanation: eteldNer,e4s, ir'e '?` :,'-'�"rZ', .. (r`�-''.) , '•s Ili r```77`'.c .1-1, /: Q4/4/ :G,J 7"f"` . S ,'L'7' rg',4 ,. , (17.) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? ' V!T MAYBE Nt'e ' Explanation: I (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public , or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? i ' • YES MAYBE NO ' Explanation: • (19) ' Recreation. Will the• proposal result in an impact upon 'the quality or quantity of existing relcreational opportunities? • YES. • M-BE NO Explanation: • (20) Archeological/Historical . Will th,e proposal result in an , . alteration of a signiiT cant archeological or historical site, structure, object or buildinlg? • YES MAYBE NO , Explanation: i III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that' to Ilthe best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood' that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance 'that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be, any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. ' Proponent: • � Cl'�C a,(4 (sighed) P ay R-eplwE . (name printed) • • City of Renton Planning Department ' 5-76 . i j • . AFFIDAVIT • • KTP RAY .TARDTNR , being duly sworn, declare that I am the a i,ex. V the property involved in this application and that the foregoirgms 'astemeWts and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed' and sworn before me t i1 � q. day Of fPrPmhPr , 1976 , • - .Notary Public in and for the State of Washington ' residing at RPntnn 42 ( am of Notary Public) (S gna r of Owner) , ice residing at 9721 Wallingford Avenue North Seattle, Washington 98103 1(16R s„nGPt Rlj,d ATE (Address) (Address) • $Paton Washi ton-'9 055 (City) state) • • (206) 228-5809 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) • CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such app f5ft �Al • QF�FV � Date Received V , 1'9"``I �DByQ Ct�� PEAR 1 6 1977 ti <v Renton Planning Dept . 'II /� �'� 2-73 AFFIDAVIT 14 -rvn r v 7A70,-%"0.117 , being duly sworn, declare that I am the :.owner- of-the property involved in this application and that the foregoing slatEeaents and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this ___�_day of n„ „,1,„�- , 19 -,,- , • 'Notary Public in and for the State of Wash-ington,�residing at -, , . ------/a ' arde-iLt . • (� of Notary Public) (Signa of •ewiiei ) • cu I residing at 9721 Wallingford Avenue North , Seattle, Washington 98103 i n(;P. 0...y, p,7 mi wrr (Address) (Address) ' (City) (State) ' (20 0 228 5.809 •, (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) • CERTIFICATION This is to ( certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been \found to be thorough and' complete in every particular . and to ' conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such appl ' a) ior � Date Rece,iv'ed �19 ;::.‘ RECEIII10 r MAR 1 6 1977 i • ' • ' `-9 • 4, Renton Planning Dept . // ti��G DE.____ 2-73 I NTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW REQUEST TO : PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR l :UILDING DIVISION 1,.// ► GINEERING DIVISION of .'AFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISIO (,7s/JUTILITIES DIVISION IRE DEPARTMEN HEALTH DEPARTMENT FROM : PLANNING DEPARTMENT NkA4A4L1. L. SP41714 Contact Person R E : SLIP yo► 2491 N1f ', , SI ML1/4 . Fett.M1T 4aDrL Please review the attached information regarding the• subject proposal and return it to the Planning Department by '3/2.5/7 7 with your written • recommendation . Your response will be included as part of the staff report to the Hearing Examiner. Thank you , PLANNING DEPARTMENT ,Date 1•1 177 • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON APRIL 12 19 77 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING' 1''ETITIONS: 1 . SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL AND GRADE OF CEMETERY PROPERTY IN GS- 1 ZONE; File No. SP-034-77 ; property located east of N . E. 3rd St. in vicinity. of 100 Blaine Ave. N. E . between Blaine Ave . N. E. and powerline right-of-way. 4' 2 . SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT RETAIL SERVICE CENTER (CONSTRUCTION SUPPLIES SALES SIMILAR TO LUMBER YARD) IN B-1 ZONE ; File No . SP-037-77 ; property located at 1068 Sunset Blvd. N. E. 3. REZONE FROM R-2 TO B-1 ; ' File No . R-035-77 ; property located at 1522 . No . Brooks St. 4 . SPECIAL PERMIT, FOR. PROFESSIONAL CLINIC IN AN R-3 ZONE ; File No. SP-036-77 ; property located on south east`corner of. Talbot Rd . S . and S . W. 43rd St: ; Legal descriptions ; of all applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. . r ' 1 ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS "ARE "INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 12 , 1977 AT 9:0.0 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. t' GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, PUBLISHED April 1 , 1977 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , Michael L . Smith , HEREBY .CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WER1 POSTEb BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS. PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW: ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, on the AQ;4' day of March 1977 SIGNE \\Lke } ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div. Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) M1ab J s +k SUBJECT : . Review of ECF- Z3L -27 ; Application No . : y-077-77 Action Name : K‘r sA ae : 1tAL ?RMIT Fop- VSE sokk AK.� t.4 411 )1AAD 14 A 8-/ 2.0 Of Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : 3(LS/77 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : ,ie part ment : 2L_D 6- s.60, � . Comments • •1 S 52 0° 14Vi LS 10�(1.M1Es ?— / —av/,v,, LA A.,,,, ,.._,„p.--. �" • _ ,2-TC dZ- A LSD �• L �:S 1211-fF %GCD CO . ouT.i I A S7-oaz- �� o 7— a s_ ki, ram— ..„---gv r ipt;„,ei`� ?r2 ?�) Signatur Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : U4,Ic4ics /PArc, wo,ltes Comments : 0 Ex, V`w f/I4Iti ni-g".VA". SCAR' , ti Situ. IC) IA cottl, S e,,J--te 5e,ev-:(.4., 0.a ..,(4 6 vp...-v (pa.), ief„vot ed -fe.c ti- /tr z w akv t- 1 '•??_' ,5c,, C o NAgti gin, Gild s (7 .0 ,14,7t--. ,:laad ' f , VZV/ 7" Signature of. Di rector or 2orized Representative Date OVER) 6-76 ( REVIEW BY OTHER CITi uEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : /,''• ////,: /J>irir. ; ('/);1'.•'/-: � !',!i"I ////; crj)�r//l J Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : // 1 6Z/ /UG Comments : l &, ://),) •7 a4, /; j Ai7yc5S ��rd C JF � rS5 Pa-vo� 2 ., W2� /- 542,a." U,,6)(' vt e • 5,wf-li �1 sty"J 15 i I yy o G 1 Gi -1- O Icy.-�/`y. 5 ri- its cu. f 1 7-/ve ,2z? Signature of Director Authorized Representatihe Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : V icy_ Comm e n\t s : `r.s‘,c 4.4.A b e.. v. r� wN 1(o5' C v� �►�, •� op�I, 1�. �,� \ .BLI.�n� \i.,5"/NeN & ''�Y\/U.N" DY`0 M cov3),:t),-2-xA"-k-co)- i4N4k1.9. w..e.Ja•XrAs ‘1-tk'x&r\st-JAALL 41\11/4-- I ))/‘)-VNANN ‘>„, . i..1\A '3A .b3twic (- \��L� V o • ny IJ ew SSh :u c.u hl"1Jt• ciLAS3N41. yvv..1•Yaix."-/N. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date \i\• Qi-ic. -e" 3 -- REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : epartment : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date . , . , , - • . . , . - ... . , . . . i . .,. : . ,t - . . . . . _ , . .; . ' • . .. . I . ) , ' . .• - ' , - • . . , . ' . . . • .',..,- , . , • . . • . . . . . . .- .1 , ) • • . . . . 7/4.-%'' •---„,. ., .. .... - .. ) ,.-3 -z,-e-: -/z --c .-.-- (-\./ d /L8T ( da will 1 . -.7d cr.z:(7/ ' 7 'N. oc) 7.; , • 9, (7,1,1/-70,, - oii, _.,-,------ ,--D-1-a-o),14 ...---) 1,.--v-r1..._0 (-__t _______, • Cl --.1 .1-7 Q _-_-_-,e• C, ___J__-±- -----7—_-_-"_. •S 7 7 ill // i rr? .- -. ../\/l7 I :-:.-7, ivr a. -. /r, C i 1 / 7)J(/1/ cr>_ ..--...:7,ityid_7_-2-i-,.. -24 (./ti- --7-- - . ' ,IV2(-E---f.".)/1, 9.1). XN/ L/V 1 1 v./c?I,/n? c . , /< // i ' - ' ''.:-;..'.7.'f,-:'...,-„..:.::-.-:'.',"-,'•' ../:.[...,? .:. '•:..::::-.-:,,...J.:,:`,..:', ,'.•;,' .. .:. .. • ...) -1-:_-_-.''F-'-'.-..',"' - '':'"i4v4.3..i.,; ',..'-,•- •-..-.;,-,-.. • . . . ,• '.. . ._ ,. , . , . . ..„.., _ _._ . . . • ,..„.--_,-.,. . ' - --, ..•.:, ,,.,-. .. --., : ,:i. ;.„:: .-,,, , . 1 ,, ' ..:.,. .•.- ,,, • .- ti:.- , -,.., -. -' :".-- , t.-_,-- -• ., -----• - ,- .. . • .c..., . - _ - :..../..... :.• , - ., .....„ .t N . ...,... ., ._ ,....._. -, .. ..-...,,,,--.--,- .,.„.,., . . ,, , ,,.. , . .. . . . -,,,, . ,,,..-.„.._..,..-.,:.:,_•., -, -v , _. - . . „ .. . . . . , . . . . . . , . . C t vj 0 F g >7 f roe v ti 0 ) 2 i`t 41`1 Co ')1 ee Rcti )1e Pi-- )9 ')/ 5 bvi cl v 1- d1 • ,n j d 3- ,9c_e )3Z4 t he PQ- 418 --(` 1 5 111. - I? dz< r�; � � �i uric % F e iu ;' Lds cc/ f '-t i, ;` 15 Fi • a F - he p pc. (R •61 c f7 Po kX1t / a f -6 o )7 k.(//=I 5 h ' Or �•F S MAR 22 • 4'1 a • � coaaq �_l•, /t/ F' it r ��• %J 7 / =%!5-:7:J (.t._ .. (c:%::G%tip-/.. (D[_"f/"- Gt 0!c-. %'1Jrirr_- Wit :, . r &,��a_,-7 -...t t'`t: - - '`t� //.:e el C ` c-�u".r-. _r ,.yL�!r y'C,,c-Ge-(/.i.�i� ✓(l'ia-L_L[LL"7--�= �C.- Cf%'"4:_, - 'Ct::. . jC�6, n .‘"/_1?-;z_,-e-- .--', 1,%--/*' ;),r6,-s-.7.,--- D / • OTC ��\� , (. r IA) _�i �- cb /; ) z. er - fJLy . • • • ---1+-- - -'----------- -- -- - - _ -- - -- - MEMORANDUM -To , Kip Ray Jardine DATE 4/5/77 'FROM Michael L . Smith , Associate Planner , Renton Planning- Dept . SUBJECT PUBLIC HEARING WITH LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Please note the change in time (from 9 : 00 a .m. to 7 : 30 p .m. ) and place (from Council Chambers to 4th floor conference room , Renton Municipal Building ) for your application to be heard by the Land Use Hearing Examiner . The date remains the same : TUESDAY , APRIL 12 , 1977 . If you have any questions , please do not hesitate to call , phone 235-2550. wr cc : Land Use Hearing Examiner ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF APRIL 12 , 1977 PAGE TWO RE : KIP RAY JARDINE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION 3 , Vegetation : Lawn and scrub grass with fruit trees and other evergreen and deciduous trees scattered throughout the site . 4 . Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site may provide some habitat for birds and small mammals native to the area . 5 . Water : Surface water and streams are not apparent on the site . 6 . Land Use : A single family residence exists on the subject site . Single family residences are located immediately south and east of the property , and an apartment building is situated south and west of the site . Various commercial uses are located to the west along Sunset Blvd . N . E . F, NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area consists of a combination of small businesses , apartment buildings , and single family residences . G. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : An 8" water main , an 8" sanitary sewer main , and an 18" storm sewer main exist along Sunset Blvd . N . E . Water and sewer service is available upon payment of fees and a $ , 01 per square foot for water and a $ . O1 per square foot ' for sewer connection charges . 2 . Fire Protection : Fire Department review comments included the requirement that a fire hydrant be located within 165 feet with no portion of the building being over 300 feet from the hydrant . A new hydrant leading from the main shall be on an 8 inch line . Fire flow requirement is .1750 gallons per minute . The subject building and business shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Fire Code Article 21 covering lumber yards . If material to be stocked in the building is over 15 feet in height , the building shall be sprinkled . A new hydrant , to be more cen- trally located , is required as indicated on the plans . 3 . Transit : . Metro Route No . 107 operates along Sunset Blvd . N . E . approximately one-fourth mile south of the subject site . 4 . Schools : The site is located within the Renton School District . 5 , Parks : Not applicable . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . 4-711A ( 7 ) , Business District , Lumber Yards , Fuel Yards , etc . 2 . Chapter 22 , Parking and Loading . I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OK OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , Objectives , Pages 17 and 18 . J . IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS : The impacts that may occur as the result of development can be miti - gated through proper drainage control , setbacks and visual screening , landscaping , and other development controls . K, SOCIAL IMPACTS: Not applicable . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 12 , 1977 APPLICANT: KIP RAY JARDINE FILE NO: SP-037-77 , SPECIAL PERMIT A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST V Applicant requests special permit for location of a retail sales business similar to, a lumber 'yard 'within a B-1 zone. Proposed use would consist of sales and storage of construction and roof- ing supplies . B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record : KIP RAY JARDINE 2. Applicant : KIP RAY JARDINE 3. Location : Property located at 1068 Sunset Blvd . N . E . 4. Legal Description : Detailed legal description available on file in Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property; Approximately 1 . 6 acres . 6 . Access : Via Sunset Blvd.. N . E . 7 . Existing Zone : B-1 Business District 8 . Existing Zoning B-1 Business District , R-3 Multi -family in Area Residence District; R-1 Single Family . Residence District. 9 . Comprehensive Medium and Low Density Multiple Family Land Use Plan : Residential . 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle, and posted i'n three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: To allow location of a construction supply sales facility within a B-1 Business District. Do HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The site has been zoned B-1 since the original zoning map was pre- pared in the early 1950 ' s . The site has been utilized for single family residential purposes for many years . There is an existing single family residence located on the site , which will also be used for. office purposes related to the subject proposal . E. PHYSICAL 'BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : , The site is relatively level . However , the site gently slopes from the southeast corner towards Sunset Blvd . N . E . creating a difference in elevation of approximately three or four feet. 2 . Soils : Ragnar (RdC) , well drained , gently sloping , utilized for timber and •'urb'an development . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF APRIL 12 , 1977 PAGE FOUR RE : KIP RAY JARDINE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION 4. The applicant had initially indicated that the proposed use would be temporary . However , the proposed improvements indi - cate a more permanent facility . It may be necessary to establish a time period for the- special permit , thereby allowing an opportunity for further review of the operation and extension of the permit . A reasonable time period would be three years . P, PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : Recommend approval of the special permit request with the setbacks and following conditions : 1 . Said approval shall be for a three year period from the date of the Examiner ' s decision . The permit may be extended for three years and for successive three-year intervals there- , after upon review and determination by the Examiner that the operation is in compliance with all conditions of approval and applicable City ordinances and is not detrimental to adjacent properties . 2 . Final Planning Department approval of detailed landscape/ screening plans , including , but not limited to : a . Provision of an eight foot site obscuring wall or fence around the entire proposed operation . b. Additional landscaping as noted in red on the plans along Sunset. Blvd . N . E . , within the proposed parking area , and along the westerly fence line . c . Continuation of southerly landscaping to the proposed gate at the southwest corner of the site . - 3 . Final Planning Department approval of the building color and the proposed minimum four foot cut in site elevation . 4. All yard lighting must be properly shielded and directed to reduce glare and light intrusion onto adjacent properties . 5 . Large trucks or trailers shall not be stored on the subject site . 6 . Any outdoor storage shall be contained entirely within the screening fenced area of the site and shall not exceed a maximum of ten feet in height . 7 . Suitable ingress/egress and circulation control shall be pro- vided per the Parking and Loading Ordinance along Sunset Blvd . N . E . , including , but not limited to , proper driveway widths and locations , landscaping , and curbing . 8 . Public Works Department approval of drainage plans with suit- , able on-site retention and oil water separation facilities . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF APRIL 12 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : KIP RAY JARDINE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended (RCW 43 . 216) , a Declaration of Non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal (see attached ) . This is based on provision of various developmental controls to mitigate potential impacts . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and site map are attached . N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Engineering Division 2 . City of Renton Utilities Division 3 . City of Renton Building Division 4. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 5. City of Renton Fire Department The above departments approved the applications. 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The site is presently zoned B-1 business district. The pro- posed use is considered similar to a lumber yard which is allowed in the B- 1 zone by special permit , after public hear- ing thereon , and acceptance of the design and an examination of the location with a finding that such proposed use is in compliance with all provisions , regulations , and standards and will not be unduly detrimental to adjacent properties and enjoyment thereof . 2 . Minimum standards are also stipulated in the Zoning Ordinance . These include the requirement for an eight foot screening fence around the facility and a minimum 100 foot setback from any residential district . The applicant proposes a view obscuring fence , together with a 25 foot landscape buffer , in lieu of the 100 foot setback requirement. The applicant also proposes to utilize an earth-tone color and make a four foot cut in the elevation of the site , which will further reduce visual impact of the proposed structure and use . The . Plan- ning Department has also received letters from the owners of the single family residences directly south of the subject site, which express acceptance of the project as proposed . These letters are attached to the staff report. It is the conclusion of the Planning Department that, if developed properly with the proposed setbacks and sufficient landscaping - areas , together with certain amendments , the proposed project will not be detrimental to adjacent residential and commercial uses . 3 . Changes and amendments in the plans which are needed to reduce potential impacts and conform to ordinance requirements include : a . The eight foot screening fence is required around the entire site . b. Additional landscaping will be necessary along the public right-of-way in the proposed parking areas and along the westerly fence line . The southerly landscape area should also be continued to the proposed gate at the southwest corner of the site . 1 4C--a. -3-"—cl---Ziti\\ - 4>) LL& ZZ Zyyu ) o Q 'a \-d 30 -,-)-2-271) * Zel(:: . iirr1/7Y i ) 9�s1`s_c-c ' o y d `ssr�� b tis4"7 ko ?- k aY .7d v/ ' .YAM o < - Qu, 17 ii , ,9do1d d c_) y ;1. Jo • >iJ 51 (4 ,► Y )-,I cPI , n9 WI : d? t?,c. i1 "v >1 r 21 'i 7 t/ Si 7-1 40.-bl d 011 d )414 d 6 Yfiahl - Y LCa-4 PY JztiiIi . a r71 9 1 s k 6e 7d au ,!PV 6 _C_ d J, 1 3- Pky2-'SyaPtc n T. 44.' ?-Dk, o, bp11 7?-,1 uC Dvi M Q.1— ic)413 0 I . ► 7 --� fi 7 2/ MAg /9 C�Try- dam' �, _`'/D A) i...v Loh a AA / / M Ay C.O.AV<_c-�2A/ , - i iv) 7i c.' p%.vE 7 M2 kip JAX I) i,v b 4-1 i 1:-.77 /9- 6-4-)/7 7//1l /5' .t=- .. T- y= d u 2 plop 1-2 7-7 L./NC- „ j p Fbc�zT-C, Mz� � f ,�' ku . b .0 t� c.v/aim' wA:�W 9 `-c-v55- 22 I977 2 --Ph a Al .2-7/- `? z 0 F, • • ,-o , . . ,.. . , . ' . ' . , . . ' '.--7:.-eA. 7.,_,) di,., (42-77//•:e4 (' . . i ( 4,5.., -, . L.") :72`,-2- ' "72't/e •;:e70.4. - ..- LitfA- A...-•/N../ 11., / 61...),..", . . (::AO L2"/Z.er7'.71.-I ‘I( L7,;((c•Z'-e-/ c1-7 Z9',2,/. '.. . (--*e. ..::2 .--e.<.-eZt-1,...•___ ,.,.-_-).. ........7:.„.2.7_,,,-.?"—. ,1_,. }.., (5/4,.../ ri-_, ,<...; . . L4,1e.t....74,7 ._.4..(21t1. _....0,/....:e....ele- ....","!‹, . . Wpeitele..--)c_cz.--, _ -6-,:', e 1'el.; ,eeiLev,tti:-../...e)7.,....,-,,___.:_, c.- ..- ..../.‘_-,..('' )0---- c172-e--1;-&-, _..,,,-;-.;: / ,-('4%.. ? .. c‘ /-7 /6' .--,f/ if.1,'t2Z2'. /M-..7-(' 4 . i!--/I? 5 . 1 • . .,..7/..1.. .,..{,... -2-:-e1, ••: , -.1 --,c--• - !I , • i...., 1/,,L,r:-.71:x•-"" il ' (, 1' I; '\ Y i 0 , N: k.,. . 1.. • , • 1 \< ) • 'S...) • / ui, , .Z 14/ " ' // ,.•c-/-' 4it5/ K , '/yi /31-A N tatICI ,.-- ...-- X-) 1 R:11.[Yle`. • . . , I . . . . • • . • ' . , . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . ... . . . ., . .. . . . . .• . . . . . . . . . . • . . . , • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . . ' • , . . . . . . . \i , l'' • .: ..-... 211.- .-:,1 it--.• t 1 I • II T _w� g ' ' t^ � II 292 La! 2T1 244L 2S1 244.41 -,i; Psi" L06 ,..ct.vt�„... / !. , ` _4r1 .y 7 '1o•" iCI I . r � _ • ( �m T r at_ 1 T,, ., 211 264 Z70 24S • ,>' 241�'!O :ri La Z14 209" :. ,. 1 I ,2, • ti ,, ' 1 .1 C11 \\ 4,1I , ....,.c. ' 1290 1, ' •_i ... 249 IC L410~' 231 I 228; 1113 :10 i �-. 1r1:� �•�' 9.• Ill' V )■ j=r1- �I at, : i4T• .ai •I: . �Ia . , •ip .. 4 �1 �_� �jI �' KIP RAY JARDINE 4 2e SPECIAL PERMIT _z4z_r 2'�0 #�9" ;t ■4 Z11 2 • .'4, �b 1 +'r Cr ZS 1 l I 1. u I =? ©t� •`I.II ai� 1. , 9 ._ ..� 7 % 73 ,1 1 0 —1" oio•''''95°41. . 111111P 43 iiii 0 . — N: IV 4:: 7 '. 59 - Arvi: -::, 6" r.:‘,\:>-,...._ I ,. si • I -—-—- . Lit 471 \ p- %,., :-; ' .. ,,,,, , , . -, “ \ _ 7 tot. 4 , . 7, .,jaw --i_, a' \ ' \\.„ 11 j bs ., '�I'�iji�.�,y$R. I Ali ` ye Si ~a 37 ~ �. � r ' _ S\ .r% V �•�'"M1.�_.!-! ,_ If r 3s, "<,•. , ^''t ■Ya ' : 'n} 7 '' %.,.\\ v IA' '• 1th.1 i- .. _ .,. .r d °) .- i jd.+•1.L(...E.1 --{ ,,. Ali ' Li ,,-�1 J. . \. \ ��t� • . 1. �� .r5 Tel il! ,iflç �\ J o r27, .:1011 • I — .1 1 Q" � Y �.� r \� TVA'\. : 1 n :1Ii: � T,� ' 1� -� • . }.• ;Y+ { .2,•,t..1 s: . : . , P I L 7 1 'N '� �,. i' fir .• • -.,-... •V /,,� • • N sk. 9 . I ''''l i i _.. 3 ,L�� "�-, m� . fir` .. t , a . S va,' Nor 4 W u !• H. T• M ". 1i. .1... fir 4 ill , •V•4••a0) sr 'I \.„ ' T O� I .,I'•s lY • 7 1 r • - 1 -1/ I \;, - 1..t::R)% �•••—tt Ili. ,t,".•'`• - „. ..,`Na`1 . 1 - T ,� • ' 1 ii I ' SPECIAL PERMIT: . ' KIP RAY JARDINE; Appl. SP-037-77; special permit for location of a retail 'sales business similar to a • lumber yard in a B-1 zone; property - located at 1068- Sunset Blvd. N.E. • APPLICANT Kip Ray Jardine TOTAL 'AREA 1.6 ,Acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Sunset Blvd. N.E. EXISTING ZONING B-1 Business District ' EXISTING USE Undeveloped • PROPOSED USE Construction of a supply. sales facility COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Medium density multi-family • COMMENTS i , . N. E. /Z rfi ST - DLJJDDUI 0 AI eD Roo in „`0 .66 pz :3 ei me Oa u Er. f usC] , ,,,, .:_ ____ __,...-------- ika•3 ' m.o.' osieN°' • ,..c, O q®0 -, 4- 4,#\‘‘ ____ i; Hov . -.g oJ'r "� ,,,,, ;no uo� 's , o %y d R. ALI II ‘1.4 . T . 0 .II I li as p I Q 5 °' '` " '" � i 0 o 0 L3 ( PACT O &tot, I allb R' ;, lost,, ' �, nu; ufJ En"' le E Eila krel61 -a 1 w Rep 4 '?. 1-3 fi] N$. /0/71 PL. w. w W Q K a . • ° 1 itil E) I Ct oa 1 bto Eli cs t 0 k-) N.0. oo TH Sr. h CO Ir . I OP c r (51=7 si i Cs ' 710i• ' cr O Et ci11411 � kl I Ez3 our O 10 [� Q 0 b LA a vl 0 0 . NO. 9rN ?I-. . Al IP 1C4 'O 0 C1G300 rj 01 CI Cal 0 CD S44LE /"= ZOO' 1 wuJscr*ft CM IUP PAYJkADIN! 1 : . POC/A.L. 71IMSt ' 5P-.037-77 ' PROPOSED/FINAL Dcx.LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/pluA-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SP-037-77 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-232-77 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant requests special permit for location of a retaii. sales business similar to a lumber yard within a B-1 zone . Pro- posed use would consist' of sales and storage of construction and roofing supplies . Proponent KIP RAY JARDINE Location of Proposal 1068 Sunset Blvd . N . E . Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not hay a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS (�] is Elais not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on .file with the lead agency . ' Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Plann ' ► , D ' ecto ,/' Date April 5 , 1977 Signature 41, ✓y.. i �.. I Ogir City of Renton Planning Department 5-76