No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA77-046 � A RS BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE �pECIAL PERMIT SP - Uyl� r77 TO FILL AND GRADE TRI PP - HA� PE12 • • I. .. • II •'. r _ I _ V ,s.:•.:...; ) N \yid\ `.+;., � t• ` ,�tf 'ti f . F,• G ' C s„e Wirt �., i • ' z�„ t t r I'j J ' I ?%e',111 '";i, .,. fit s". :- r ::,.".i',,a-; I 11' • ' � • I'I] '' 1' >S' e:•SL ti Gz : , •• 4. �r / f, I 'ti'��( • ,r Q tM1 '•• :•l, .�4I •' :�F.'.:+;C•.S?;;J 1 I 7., I :.0 . Liu 7!�,.. ,:•,•,. 'r 4••••••�>••':•::. }'S:::: t' y.r `,r,, I 'i ( '. ..:*:.:%..........':ii,‘C.,,,,,:C.,9..,.!;,N,S:,41:,,W, �''' �y[f4 Q le',4.,i':.tii9'1.(/ T.!-(."j ,,...., }} -1 :;:':•••-•••t,f 1 . �� 1-f.'::•{`:lrrL4".v,ll„iu,•.(.,-1.4I •r�lt' ,t:......•.r "3 F':..: :',•:: '}i,.':':':..• , II �`, d''i'%r'::,./q Li•0,},n/t",4r�2�, :4J:1;:;;;};,;,;.•,•H:•.,, E yy�� •"•` p I --. .. .- ..:-. ;. 1 :, t, y::-'4'�r!'''•g"v.• 1 1!till ':•. 1r, ::::. ,• • •••,." •..I.).•"J' 'r . ---•' • ��t' rs� .4`�'3� ...:�si. a 3 Fk+I= .Q. II i ::• �7!k'4}r...,....•••• J7JXvarc`y',::,:,,. ....-.....:,:;‘,_•� `+ 1 i :•i 1� ,i;', i'fAL•It�:' :r: ,. A : • •w''',*:i1'I.� �'•' >l.'^.•... .:-r•rE^:>;n . S;'wd'}''ty,� { l .Gv' r.• ;.��1�.,. ,3G. ID ti+0lY{ BG�{P l.•:.•.•.. ;.I.i`m:�l� r .m u .:rt'#:n< 'o�a , rbv C, r......•. :ry ,3'�'la;�•,• _ a.. ..,n 'r�,.l�I•!•P 1. :! 1 �•,.. .J d', .14oI:e • }7t:+• :;: ::;:�+i7C 8!2 S tJ: 'tl w(�_yy\'•;•:•:•:•: . t iyrr.✓, ,, 9• „9S 9 0 ,n m.ia'0 '6,cJ�' ;:•:•: � ':,',•,•,::::..rev ,.., ,•.•.. i"j^,,T.0 t e E . :•: j'f,-��.t, •C,L ©PD C+6 t ,9 Gf 4J :1 ..... ...�( ...-... •!.':v:'.•.':•: a':':• +t`h;�_j;ip .l 'I• •:'••::: ;. ::::i!v,.6., {`.,m ro N o c tJ t •,(:::•,•:•::•: E.: 1-„ • ..:.•,•:: - c;t{c:+, t t • •• .• ::y✓i.q H O F Co rA p `A,•'•, ,• •''w3-};1:• :�'i�1:v��i'1 Wri.r� .... • ., ,f 1 x>J,,t,„I.• • 0 O PS •�''t C+.r .KA,«1'_,:Ai�:i�:•L..wv;:::::s` /,�t , r ti?.•mmr,uua�rrdoy 44+ : A:' t �,• tJ,•:'. ±�ri�'O lT 4 61 O Ib 9 41.C+fit ID N' f �' I .:•�:rJ{:;; ;1t},1 n a)ro n®ro a!,m e+v t, :•: 9 h r .�r. 7`r,.O 6b LJ 6 rD a)PA 4b+b a .•� r:'j � r .o • :••��S,•� r '�,l tit 0 iD Fi C'0 :':'1� r4 ' L '`!`!• `�ti rbLN+A�lR6arflHAC1+ : rn ............ .tl�1 w� (—: , : L ' ,�y, 06 DGrLiNtC 6,61 rb,C, ✓,t •ar.•1 ',l""d ::'•'''•.::•:'ti:•:•..:•:.y •:.• it k,�,�•P • ,� �i::(jti'.;';,.1i c�•,�aKtr••u'-r� m^'j p t��E:,'i,, 1•;1!, .1','.. ,r. Ji•l.n. „y, �`CC v�`:��f`�.y o p a to o m o is e=S. tt"falfti1 yalJi' Lc' '•'•:•:•:•::•:• ••:•:•:• • :; ;L�2 ��C't:; • �\)/)'� ki4,F�J n't�:�:•.��,`,p�'��'i:1'`",.:.r}i1'S{- ' "".tl 'f�^i ,.,:!••::•1r:u2`kl'{ y ftiy;Ya,:� :.l.,/ .7:n*q°f�.,�,i..vra�,,. �+i��,�;' '•.'•'�,':.:•: •:•';:.•.. •:�, .1,�,�i � ' I t<( .e .I y =f vt '7. t= xl' ::r ,tu•: :: -4,ar�,•a>�:,ri�a` rr'��=�zt';�;;:;::;:;:::::''�:::� ::,.,.t� )) ,+.t' CITY. , LIMITS �.• 2t,}tl v .r`•,i",,7 r11.��� +•,t',•y�:.:.�j ,,y'.,y}- '.N'�1/.�•� , yy',,'�'ri.11{ .:M1I .y`..,2 'f!1:f,�n�$ �f•':••••••••'•� .t4pi - .' `'j,,,.l,E } 'G'ri'.,::!1..F:'I,;:j%y;y�i'.r.'•.•..•• •••.'.':.'.;•.;.;nJll:.'.'•'.•:. �F"„1�' `t a } .J .a, iii i ,,, , (, ryj } at ;,�` :�v?.,.6tiw. :f S� 3 ail. 4. • •• :J F� {{ii CI• q. a. •'rt .r � b I tr' IA :•.J' nt h. a,J , • Z' . r ll d:. .f- • I .y �•7 r 'r r r. A: �p S I Jt fI, i :• • ::: :::;: ::::::.:yr • C' :Sr✓p , I r.'y¢ ':1 ^Y ti VT .ylp. • �''"4V'ri3L r li s k'+ :isn1 ai�G}a"'�," !aal rJl.16/IwY;,• i�{alh:' • Nua\ KENT - r// ,. •, ,•,,. . . o ?egend: CiT � ® • LAND USE ELEMENT ! PLANNING DEPT.. ;I Manufacturing Park • „..,c,,,,e® Recreation ; FIGURE 2 • , . 1. ern? '" ec ^ Commercial L?„+,11761`' Greenbelt '- Drainage Channel �'�r,,U�.w"'� Public ; : GREED' RIVER VALLEY . . 1 E T R ,�.:;.,.,:;;,Y,;.. /� ' 1i� \ 1 • 3 0l `., 4. Sul —�, rl — 1 P O S A L • ,�\ I �_cu >/ PA"FPN%� �"i llii P`' SRN % 31011 I II 1tiffilif• rig t5 II • 5.1 7-, ,..,,1"-"--Chrfliill . .. T - ., i ,0---- .,., I''HP! ' alW W n ii, .< , ___1„2. Sw 19 T- 5T. E M i -1-td-.4,..;4:=___L . __r. . _, :I, . __ ___.,_ •A P. i rU • --,k- . 4. ' • lf *. IN OF H NRY EADER DO r1 , __17 - -- -- PTIOI.: CAA\M NO.46 \\ I I�� 1 be00, U 1� (JCN LI, II : 'I - =3-- EMI 1 $ 1 > >-. Ix . _a n Q . 1! I u -----------7"---, 0 IMIMII n —1N;— �Si2 W i { —r.w s >' . t c' -.:.--. lI • OF HENRY MET TIER DONATION CLAIM NO. 4G ,f5+iel,*' �' ''Mi- t / i Y� p! y • a • In I\ I .• • , . _ . . • _ I---------- .." 1 :::'''. ' .; .' ' I . I .PJ 4 5 6 T ‘,3 7 , 4-— . ' i ' S I GROUP FOUR,Inc. TR 1 P/M ARPE R .t. 19707 44th Avenue West , / h� /� � P , .' Lynnwood, Washington 98036 • 206 775-4581 V I G !`V 1 T Y '1 n i +�+ r'�4 IUMY{YIN• ■NOINltNINO ►LANNINO NANAO[N•f•'7 r' /�' r'IKyt'• ►Y l.r•n.Jrn IIIt c I G• I — e, — JL 22, 1177 QELG_ 0 -_T_E.E LAND USE SEAR ._-_UACIIl�ER � (1 a2 0�t SLYF P,Fi�lTO�J ��g1� '- .. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, J0OC3 r APPLICANT: Tripp - Harper FILE NO. SP-04 J 00 c00 ` LOCATION: Property is located approximately one-half mile . ' 44120 s East Valley Highway, midway between Olympic Pipe Lin Mobil Oil site and Longacres Race Track. The subject site is also situated just north of the City's 20 acre • wetlands area and just west of the Springbrook drainage channel. - SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests special permit pursuant to the City's Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance to allow removal • of a portion of the existing fill on the southerly half of the subject property and ,placing it on the northerly half of the subject site to obtain an overall site subgrade elevation of 14.5 feet. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval subject to conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on July 5, 1977. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on July 12, 1977 at 9:10 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1 and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #3: Existing Topography Map Exhibit #4: Drainage Plan Exhibit #5: Cross Section Map Exhibit #6: Access Warranty Deed Exhibit #7: Letter from Public Works Department, dated July 11, 1977 Exhibit #8: Letter from applicant, dated May 23, 1977 Mr. Smith reviewed Exhibit #7 which recommends installation of a two-foot berm around the site following filling operations to provide 50-acre feet of storage for storm water. The Examiner entered the following two exhibits into the record: 4çcEN7 , Exhibit #9: Application to King County Hydraulics Division f� A,3, Exhibit #10: Letter from Olympic Pipe Line Company, f .,. ,,c _- 5 hey dated July 7, 1977 k LD a13 .,,° :"'/ • 1 Y _a~( rS" i� .it,,, -i. •F`t t�"� -S`,iJl'! 14'f''- JtF A•!. T!,j ,:d t •• r.,r,' : +i4�:a '✓,�'{' '.- f ,�' • ' :: ; ? • t, -,. • • .,.�Q' _ J , cj.:" .` 4i .!t' fs.. ,! .:d. t` t 'f, � .",. Tr, ' d ..i.* " •,.:. 5)'', • b r�_ of 4 ..' ''v r Fy ' ' ,f •-'"a- 2 [', .t" `Q y Fa 'IiNJ:y..- ii; • i. • • i"4' sL•s l i. ti- t'. a.. • 1'�'.:. .....�.rub k...: i-�;,:,-,vim",i } 1 " I, ti> v a. `- i' rA, y bT'- . ''1 Tv'�� r s, y - : '• .� • • • ttia f^ - - dt.> s.- .Y. .1l' - • ohs J, �:. v f - r,. .S 5 . • 4�: _Ys ''1 1 ' qF !' � 'f 'LIf.:p 'e''♦ s P'•''1:•,�f :l" f t I. rt ' /.•. R�.f1j y 67 ,.5:➢disNmi8 , : J, ,,( ,f� (.;%` i b` ; i✓ : . ,f1 t? "r v.G r , • • • • r. -' 'r- Y8' '' i„,t ' { f>. ..' 44S d `,t.-' 1, y..;1.,• _ { , ., j'. i'. SP-046-77 , Page Two Mr . Smith indicated that no response had been received to date. from the King County Hydraulics Division. The Examiner inquired about Item P.1. on Exhibit #1 regarding the portion of the site within 60 feet of the centerline of the Springbrook Drainage Creek and asked the relationship of the recommendation to the Mining, Excavation, and Crading ordinance setback requirements of 751feet. Mr. Smith indicated that the ordinance requirement referred to surface mining operations and was not considered a mandatory requirement. • In reference to Exhibit #1, Item P.4.� the Examiner asked if the requirement for utilization of 2% of .the site for landscape wildlife mitigation referred to existing or installed landscaping. Mr. Smith indicated that the site contained no significant vegetation and that a plant list for 'suitable material for on site development would Ibe • available from the Planning Department. The Examiner inquired about the compatibility of the proposed development with the Glacier Park fill project. Mr. Smith reported that the proposal is compatible with the existing development, although the 29 acres of wetland in the Glacier Park area did not create a typical site because of ,the difference in°character of the property. He suggested requiring specific site planning at the time of development and to obtain requirements for landscaping from the Soil Conservation Service as an alternative for' a donation of land for wildlife mitigation. • • The Examiner inquired about Item P.7. of Exhibit #1 in regards to a requirement for a hold harmless agreement pertaining to drainage, problems. Mr. Smith indicated that while the agreement was not required on the Glacier Park property, it may be necessary in this particular case because of cumulative impacts of filling the valley prior to the Soil Conservation Service P-1 and P-9 projects. In regard to Item P.B. of Exhibit #1, the Examiner asked Mr. Smith the relationship of minimum setback requirements for slope toes found in Section 4-2314 to the Planning Department report recommending the toe of the slopes to be placed entirely within the, subject site. Mr. Smith indicated that the recommendation found in the code relates to mining operations only and the recommendation found in Exhibit #1 had been imposed to prevent fill material from sloughing onto adjacent properties as had occurred previously in careless operations. He also felt that because of unknown problems related to the eventual pattern of fill in the valley area, it would be helpful to retain drainage areas to offset the possible impact of fill operations. The Examiner, asked Mr. Smith if similar requirements had been imposed on other landfill projects • in the area and if variances had been granted. Mr. Smith responded negatively to both inquiries, and indicated that the decision had been an administrative interpretation. In regard to Item P.9. of Exhibit #1 relating to suitable temporary access for filling and grading, the Examiner asked if future improvements to S.W. 27th Street were scheduled in the Six-Year Street Plan. Mr. Smith indicated that improvements had been scheduled on the street plan and also in the city's Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The Examiner asked about the necessity for a safety fence and if the applicant had submitted a rehabilitation plan for the slopes. Mr. Smith responded negatively to both questions. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith to estimate the gross amount of fill which would be moved. Mr. Smith estimated ,eighty thousand cubic yards, and although the applicant had not yet submitted a phase plan, he assumed the operation would not require more than one annual license to complete. The applicant requested permission to allow the representative from the Olympic Pipe Line Company to testify. Responding, after being sworn, was: Frank Jacobs Olympic Pipe Line Company P.O. Box 236 Renton, WA , 98055 • Mr. Jacobs clarified the •letter submitted by the Olympic Pipe Line Company and stated that the company had no opposition to the project. • The Examiner called for a ten minute recess at 10:15 a.m. The hearing reconvened at 10:25 a.m. with all parties present. ' The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in the Planning Department, report. Responding was: James Tripp , 324 S.W. 16th • Renton, WA ' 98055 SP- 046-77 Page Three t•tr. . Tripp indicated that while he concurred in the major recommendations. in the report, he was concerned about setback requirements designated in Item P.1. of Exhibit 451. Ile reported that he approved of recommendations to establish a dyke surrounding the property and to hydroseed the slopes. In regards to access, he indicated that the intended access to the property is from Lind Avenue through a 60-foot easement. He reported that completion of the grading within one year would depend upon the timing of the issuance of the permit and weather conditions. The Examiner referred to Exhibit #10, letter from Olympic Pipe Line Company, and asked the applicant about the use of the access roadway. Mr. Tripp stated that the concern originated from •tbe use of the company's private roadway located between Lind Avenue and the East Valley High"way, and he indicated that he did not intend to utilize the private road for access. Mr. Tripp stated that some additional fill in the form of crushed concrete would be required to bring the elevation height to 15 feet and°'that buildings would be fleod- proofed to that elevation. The Examiner asked the applicant about a temporary access agreement with Longacres Race Track and other properties to the west. Mr. Tripp reported that although Burlington Northern Railroad owns property to the west, he did not have a formalized agreement from that property. In response to the Examiner's question about the present condition of Lind Avenue, Mr. Smith reported that the street would require additional fill. Mr. Tripp stated that no problems exist for access to the property for the proposed project. He reported that hydroseeding the slope would improve esthetics for planting purposes and the 40-foot setback requirement would set aside 4% of the property to meet the Soil Conservation Service requirement of 2% for landscape wildlife mitigation. In response to the Examiner's inquiry regarding the contingency of the issuance of the special permit upon approval by the King County Hydraulics Division, Mr. Smith answered affirmatively. The Examiner referred to specific requirements in the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance, Section 4-2311, relating to landscaping and reuse of the site. Mr. Smith stated that when development occurs, a reuse proposal would include requirements for setbacks, landscaping and type of materials. The Examiner asked for further comments in support or opposition of the application. There was no response. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith for modifications or additions to the staff report. Mr. Smith indicated concerns regarding improvements to S.W. 27th Street, additional fill required because of sloughing conditions, hydroseeding subject to departmental approval, removal of existing fill on the south half of the property within the 60-foot area from the centerline of Springbrook Drainage Creek in relationship to South 27th Street, and the possibility of additional right-of-way requirements. The Examiner asked for further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on Item #SP-046-77 was closed by the Examiner at 10:45 am. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a Special Permit for grading and filling pursuant to requirements of the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance' (C hapter 23, Title IV) . 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference • as set forth in full herein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State 'Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance . has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Erickson, responsible official, provided suitable mitigation measures are taken. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by. all city departments affected by the impact of. this development and no adverse comment was expressed. 5. -There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities except water and sewer are available and in close proximity. 7. The Comprehensive Land Use Map indicates the property to be Manufacturing Park. A greenbelt designation is given Springbrook Creek, P-1 and P-9 drainage channels. SP-046-77 Page -Four , 8., A Flood Control Zone Application 'has been submitted to the King County Department of I-3ydraul.ics Division and the Department of Ecology; however, approvals 'have not, yet been given by these agencies . ' 9. Existing zoning on the property is H-1, Heavy Industry. The-applicant stated that the future plans for the property are for office and warehouse uses. - 10. The proposal consists of removing approximately 83;000 cubic yards of existing fill material on the southern portion of the ,site for deposit on the northern portion.' Upon completion of the grading and filling, an average elevation of 14.5 feet will result. It is estimated that the project will be completed,within two months and • that eventual development might occur within one year. No .pavipc'or import of fill, - material will occur in this phase- of development. 11. Substantial landfill projects have occurred and are occurring in .this general area. The proposed design generally conforms to the design of..these•projects. • In general, the elevation of these projects is approximately tpe. same' as proposed; for the site. The Department of Ecology and King County Hydraulics Division design. standard of an elevation of 21.8 feet in this area is being re-evaluated and is expected to be revised. If the revision does not occur, the applicant stated that measures would be taken in the future to meet the standard. . 12. Lying along the eastern boundary of the site is the Springbrook Drainage Creek of . a dedicated 40-foot easement. Past- precedent has been established in this area (e.g. Glacier Park Company landfill) to require a 60-foot from centerline setback for landfill and grading to enhance the Creek drainage and wildlife habitat. 13. Two other substantial drainage channels border the site. The P-1 Channel lies along the western property line,' and the P-9 channel along.the ,northern property line. Directly adjacent to the South property line is located the wetland area owned by' the city, , 14. After review of the drainage plan, the Public Works Department recommended a dyke ' . system around the perimeter of the top of the fill. The -applicant expressed . agreement with this modification to the original proposal. ' 15. Plans for stabilizing the banks of the fill' and grading were not submitted; however the applicant stated that hydroseeding of the banks would be utilized for that purpose. . . . 16. Adequate access exists to the subject site-via what would.be S.W. 27th Street for the temporary purpose of access for the grading equipment. ' :Olympic Pipe Line 1 . Company objects to continual use by heavy equipment ove'r' this shared easement. Lind Avenue would be connected to S.W. 27th for the purpose of this access. Permanent access will be resolved in the future. . 17. Section 4-2303.2.C. requires approval by the Examiner of the, eventual: use of the property, which would reasonably include the final site plan. 18. A safety fence to enclose the project was not felt necessary (Section 4-2311.1) ., 19. Section 4-2311.2 specifies that a 75-foot setback of grading from the property • line may be imposed. This was found unnecessary due to other conditions being applied to 'the proposal. .. ' CONCLUSIONS: . ' 1. The proposal generally conforms to the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan. . The I goals listed on page 4 of the plan are 'met in this initial phase of, eventual development. Specific compliance will be determined during review of the proposed site plan. ' The objectives outlined in pages 5 through 7 are also met or can be met • as a result of the Examiner's decision. Areas for greenbelt and wildlife habitat purposes are encouraged. Compliance with the Soil Conservation, Service requirement. for 2% of the ,site for,wildlife can be achieved as well by maintaining°a greenbelt of 40 feet -along -the eastern-property. . . ' line coincidential with the Springbrook Creek (total of 60 feet from centerline of . the creek as implemented elsewhere in the area) . This drainage channel should be hydroseeded if regrading occurs' (Section 4-2311.2) . A mixture of, coniferous and deciduous trees would also be desirable for planting to provide the, animal habitat ' and enhance future landscaping installed during final development (Section 4-2311.2) . • Only the hydroseeding is required which will result in.character similar to that on other properties in the vicinity. . • " ' SP-046-77 Page Five 2. Section 4-•2303.2,B. of the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance requires that the Examiner conclude that the Special Permit ". . .not be unreasonably detrimental to the surrounding area. " .Based upon the evidence submitted in the hearing, the proposed grading and filling is compatible with and similar to existing landfill operations in the immediate vicinity. Since the project will occur in a drainage area, some conditions to the Special Permit are necessary. to control erosion, mitigate loss of animal habitat, and facilitate water drainage. These conditions will make the Special Permit not detrimental to the adjacent properties and surrounding area. 3. The P-1 and P-9 drainage channels require protection from sloughing of landfill into the channels, thereby reducing their drainage effectiveness (Section This can be accomplished via hydroseeding the banks of the landfill and perhaps "stair-stepping" the slopes (Section 4-2311.2.) . Furthermore,, the landfill should occur entirely within the boundaries of the site, not in the drainage channels or Springbrook Creek easement (Section 4-2314.) . 0 • 4. Drainage of the storm water that will accumulate atop the fill can be accomplished several ways. The Public Works Department's suggestion of dykes around the top and perimeter of the site seems the most simple and reasonable solution. Such a system will provide more than adequate holding capacity for recharge into the landfill. Upon submittal of the site plan for final development, this drainage plan will again be reviewed as revisions will be necessary. 5. In order to help control dust and erosion, the entire grading and fill operation should be hydroseeded except where existing vegetation is retained. 6. Per Section 4--2303.2.C. the final uses and site plan must be approved by the Examiner. A public hearing will be required, and the Examiner must conclude that the uses and site plan conform to the Comprehensive Plan and are compatible with the vicinity as well as`applicable zoning requirements. 7. Sufficient access to the property exists via Lind Avenue and the easement across Olympic Pipe Line Company property for the proposed phase of development of the property. Only slight grading is necessary to implement this access., However, • subsequent phases of development will require re-evaluation of the access. Olympic Pipe Line Company is on record opposing regular, continual use of the improved road in the easement. At this phase, only one-time access onto and off the subject site is necessary, but future improvements (filling, paving, construction) will require continual vehicular access for heavy and light equipment. The applicant is actively pursuing the future access, which must be resolved prior to the Examiner's review of the final development site plan. The proposed development of what would be S.W. 27th Street should be investigated by the applicant with the Public Works Department. This improvement may meet the future, permanent access requirements. DECISION: • Based upon the record, findings and conclusions, the grading and filling Special Permit . is approved, subject to 1. Forty-foot greenbelt area of existing vegetation be set aside along the eastern property line. Any fill in this area is to be removed and the area regraded to the grade of the drainage channel and hydroseeded. The toe of the landfill will not extend into this greenbelt. Existing trees shall be retained in this area. 2. Filling not to occur in the P-1 and P-9 drainage channels. Any existing fill in these channels is to be removed and the area regraded to the established grade of the channel and hydroseeded. Existing vegetation is to be retained in these drainage channels. The toe of the landfill is to be within the subject site, and the grade hydroseeded and constructed to prevent sloughing of landfill into the drainage channels. • 3. Interim. storm water retention be accomplished via construction of a two-foot berm around the top and perimeter of the site. • 4. The entire regrading and landfill be hydroseeded as soon as possible after the completion of the grading, except for portions where existing vegetation is retained. 5. Final approval of the engineering design and supervision of 'the grading and filling for compliance with the requirements of Chapter 23, Title IV, including the annual license by the Public Works Department. • • • SP-046-77 Page Six i ina1 approval of the proposal by the King County Department of Hydraulics Division end Department of Ecology of the Flood Zone Control Permit. 7. Final approval of the uses and site plan for the property by the Hearing Examiner after conducting a public hearing. 8. Erosion control measures for utilization during grading and filling be approved by the Public Works Department to afford maximum possible protection from siltation of Springbrook Creek, and P-1 and P-9 drainage channels, and the adjacent city wetlands area. 9. Resolution of permanent vehicular, access to the property be accomplished 'prior. to submittal for approval of the final development site plan. 10. Suitable dust control methods be utilized, including watering of work areas per approval of the Public Works Department. ORDERED THIS 22nd day of July, 1977. • L. Ric Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of July, 1977 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: James Tripp Frank Jacobs • TRANSMITTED. THIS 22nd day of July, 1977 to the following: ' • • Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti • . ' Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen; Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must • be filed in writing on or before August 5, 1977. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section .3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and • meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, • or same may be purchased at cost in said office. Invoice No. 619 C I 'I' Y . 'OF RENTON 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASH I NGTON 98055 Cif TY CLERK Depar.t'ment or Division Date September 8, 1977 Tripp/Harper Please make checks. payable to 324 S . W. 16th Renton, Wa. 98055 Finance Department_ City of Renton Recording fees for Restrictive Covenants at King County $4 . 00 .' Records & Elections Department Restrictive Covenants ( copy attached ) K. C . Receiving Receipt ( copy attached ) #7708160764 { I I Total; Due $4 0.0 _-- - / DECLARATION; OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS , James W. Tripp and Patricia L. Tripp, his wife, . and James F. Harper, are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows : That portion of Government Lot 9 and the Henry, Meader • Donation Claim No. 46, all in Section 25 , Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W. M. , described as follows : CD Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Section 25 ; thence South 0° 49 ' 10" West, along the East line of said • OD Section 25 a distance of 180. 01 feet to an intersection CD with a line parallel to and 180 feet southerly, measured h at right angles to, the north line of said Section 25 ; thence North 87° 12 ' 59" West, parallel with said North line, 20 . 01 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to and 20. 00 feet Westerly, measured at right angles to the East line of said Section 25 , said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 87°12 ' 59" West, parallel and 180 . 00 feet Southerly of the North line of said section, a distance of 1026 . 07 feet; thence South 1 01 ' 19" West 1095 . 58 feet; thence South 88° 24 ' 48" East • 1029 . 43 feet to a point on a line 20 feet Westerly, measured at right angles to the East line of said Section 25; thence North 0°49 ' 10" East parallel to said east line 1074 . 19 feet to the True Point of Beginning. WHEREAS , the owners of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property; NOW THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned , their successors, heirs and assigns , as follows : GREENBELT Forty-foot greenbelt area of existing vegetation shall be set aside along the eastern property line. Any fill in . this area is to be removed and the area regraded to the grade of t41e drainage channel and hydroseeded. If possible , the toe of the landfill will not extend into this greenbelt . Existing trees shall be retained in this area where practical . LANDFILL AND GRADING OPERATIONS Filling shall not occur in the P-1 and P-1 drainage channels,. Any existing fill in these channels is to be removed. and the area regraded to the grade of the drainage channel and hydroseeded. Existing vegetation is to be retained in these drainage channels. The toe of the landfill I -2- is to be within the subject site, and the grade hydroseeded and constructed to prevent sloughing of landfill into the drainage channels.', The entire regrading and landfill shall be hydroseeded as soon as possible after the completion of the grading, except for portions where existing vegetation is retained. Final approval of the engineering design and supervision of , the grading and filling is required under Chapter 23, Title IV, Code of General Ordinances, Renton, Washington. Erosion control measures for utilization during grading and filling shall be approved by the Public Works Department to afford maximum possible protection from siltation of 0 Springbrook Creek, and P-1 and P-9 drainage channels, and the adjacent city wetlands area. CD Suitable dust control methods shall be utilized, including r" watering of work areas per approval of the Public Works Department. STORM DRAINAGE Interim storm water retention shall be accomplished via construction of a two-foot berm around the top and perimeter of the site. VEHICULAR ACCESS Resolution by the aforesaid owners of permanent vehicular access to the property shall be accomplished prior to submittal for approval of the final development site plan. FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Final approval of the uses and site plan for the property shall be required by the Hearing Examiner after conducting a public hearing. OTHER APPROVALS Final approval of the proposal by the King County Department of Hydraulics Division and Department of Ecology of the Flood Zone Control Permit shall be required. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proxlegal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either theCity of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. Reasonable attorneys ' fees incurred during said enforcement will be borne by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns . • . . Javies -3- • Patricia L. Tripp / ames F. Harper CD STATE OF WASHINGTON) CD COUNTY OF KING N- On this day of (le; , 1977 ,. before me personally appeared J •••:' / , and / •--/- • . • I the persons who executed the within and . . 'foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and . purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. • , , Notay Public in l4.*rfor the State of WashingtonVresiding, at • . . , • • • ,� pF R�y 0 THE CITY OF RENTON V `. .4'-r" MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 p � '' °' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI ► MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER � L.L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 1'44. SEPItw® August 8 , 1977 Mr. Jim Tripp RE : File No. SP-046-77 324 S.W. 16th Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Tripp: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner' s report of July 22, 1977 , has not been appealed within the time period set by ordinance, and therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Restrictive Covenants will be filed by the City Clerk with King County. s ,e 1r4gr:7;.ak _.�. �__._._._....... L. 'ick Beeler Hearing Examiner LRB:mp cc: Planning Department I/City Clerk DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, James W. Tripp and Patricia L. Tripp, his wife, and James F. Harper, are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: That portion of Government Lot 9 and the Henry Meader Donation Claim No. 46, all in Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W. M. , described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Section 25; thence South 0° 49'10" West, along the East line of said Section 25 a distance of 180.01 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to and 180 feet southerly, measured at right angles to, the north line of said Section 25; thence North 87°12'59" West, parallel with said North line, 20.01 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to and 20.00 feet Westerly, measured at right angles to the East line of said Section 25, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 87°12'59" West, parallel and 180.00 feet Southerly of the North line of said section, a distance of 1026.07 feet; thence South 1 01'19" West 1095.58 feet; thence South 88°24'48" East 1029.43 feet to a point on a line 20 feet Westerly, measured at right angles to the East line of said Section 25; thence North 0°49'10" East parallel to said east line 1074.19 feet to the True Point of Beginning. WHEREAS, the owners of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property; NOW THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: GREENBELT Forty-foot greenbelt area of existing vegetation shall be set aside along the eastern property line. Any fill in this area is to be removed and the area regraded to the grade of the drainage channel and hydroseeded. If possible, the toe of the landfill will not extend into this greenbelt. Existing trees shall be retained in this area where practical. LANDFILL AND GRADING OPERATIONS Filling shall not occur in the P-1 and P-1 drainage channels. Any existing fill in these channels is to be removed and the area regraded to the grade of the drainage channel and hydroseeded. Existing vegetation is to be • retained in these drainage channels. The toe of the landfill -2- is to be within the subject site, and the grade hydroseeded and constructed to prevent sloughing of landfill into the drainage channels. The entire regrading and landfill shall be hydroseeded as soon as possible after the completion of the grading, except for portions where existing vegetation is retained. Final approval of the engineering design and supervision of the grading and filling is required under Chapter 23, Title IV, Code of General Ordinances, Renton, Washington. Erosion control measures for utilization during grading and filling, shall be approved by the Public Works Department to afford maximum possible protection from siltation of Springbrook Creek, and P-1 and P-9 drainage channels, and the adjacent city wetlands area. Suitable dust control methods shall be utilized, including watering of work areas per approval of the Public Works Department. STORM DRAINAGE Interim storm water retention shall be accomplished via construction of a two-foot berm around the top and perimeter of the site. VEHICULAR ACCESS Resolution by the aforesaid owners of permanent vehicular access to the property shall be accomplished prior to submittal for approval of the final development site plan. FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Final approval of the uses and site plan for the property shall be required by the Hearing Examiner after conducting a public hearing. OTHER APPROVALS Final approval of the proposal by the King County Department of Hydraulics Division and Department of Ecology of the Flood Zone Control Permit shall be required. DURATION' These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. Reasonable attorneys'' fees incurred during said enforcement will • be borne by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns. -3- - • !�ri Wit- mv-/ it J e �.t,c.�a— ,- :- ,CSC ._ .� , Pa _c*tricia L. Tripp lA/ Aames F. Harper STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) ' On this% day off (,. .-f L<,c..z , 1977, before me personally appeared 9,n , CCJ. ,:/1..,�;d-, (�tc/iu-u-.e- �J,,j9 , and ci �inta> f �/ tfaec,, , the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notd4 Public in and,for the . • State� of�-Was}� ingtorp, residing • at Q�/`,,�lP_u.A�(.`. r� i c SP-046-77 Page Two Mr. Smith indicated that no response had been received to date from the King County Hydraulics Division. The Examiner inquired about Item P.1. on Exhibit #1 regarding the portion of the site within 60 feet of the centerline of the Springbrook Drainage Creek and asked the relationship of the recommendation to the Mining, Excavation, and C,rading Ordinance setback requirements of 75 feet. Mr. Smith indicated that the ordinance requirement referred to surface mining operations and was not considered a mandatory requirement. In reference to Exhibit #1, Item"P.4. the Examiner asked if the requirement for utilization of 2% of the site for landscape wildlife mitigation referred to existing or installed landscaping. Mr. Smith indicated that the site contained no significant vegetation and that a plant list for suitable material for on site development would be available from the Planning,Department. " • The Examiner inquired about the compatibility of the proposed development with the Glacier Park fill project. Mr. Smith reported that the proposal is compatible with the existing development, although the 29 acres of wetland in the Glacier Park area did not create a typical site because of the difference in character of the property. He suggested requiring specific site planning at the time of development and to obtain • requirements for landscaping from the Soil Conservation Service as an alternative for a donation of land for wildlife mitigation. The Examiner inquired about Item P.7. of Exhibit #1 in regards to a requirement for a hold harmless agreement pertaining to drainage problems. Mr. Smith indicated that while the agreement was not required on the Glacier Park property, it may be necessary in this particular case because of cumulative impacts of filling the valley prior to the Soil Conservation Service P-1 and P-9 projects. In regard to Item P.8. of Exhibit #1, the Examiner asked Mr. Smith the relationship of minimum setback requirements for slope toes found in Section 4-2314 to the Planning Department report recommending the toe of the slopes to be placed entirely within the subject site. Mr. Smith- indicated that the recommendation found-in the code relates to mining operations only and the recommendation found in Exhibit #1 had been imposed to prevent fill material from sloughing onto adjacent properties as had occurred previously in careless operations. He also felt that because of unknown problems related to the eventual pattern of fill in the valley area, it would be helpful to retain drainage areas to offset the possible impact of fill operations. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith if similar requirements had been imposed on other landfill projects in the area and if variances had been granted. Mr. Smith responded negatively to both inquiries, and indicated that the decision had been an administrative interpretation. In regard to Item P.9. of Exhibit #1 relating to suitable temporary access for filling and grading, the Examiner asked if future improvements to S.W. 27th Street were scheduled in the Six-Year Street Plan. Mr. Smith indicated that improvements had been scheduled on the street plan and also in the city's Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The Examiner asked about the necessity for a safety fence and if the applicant had submitted a rehabilitation plan for the slopes. Mr.. Smith responded negatively to both questions. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith to estimate the gross amount of fill which would be moved. Mr. Smith estimated eighty thousand cubic yards, and although the applicant had not yet submitted a phase plan, he assumed the operation would not require more than one annual license to complete. The applicant requested permission to allow the representative from the Olympic Pipe Line Company to testify. Responding, after being sworn, was: Frank Jacobs Olympic Pipe Line Company P.O. Box, 236 Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Jacobs clarified the •letter submitted by the Olympic Pipe Line Company and stated that the company had no opposition to the project. The Examiner called for a ten minute recess at 10:15 a.m. The hearing reconvened at 10:25 a.m. with all parties present. The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in the Planning Department report. i Responding was: James Tripp 324 S.W. 16th Renton, WA 98055 f. 9 Jul_ 2, 1977 a OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. ' APPLICANT: Tripp - Harper FILE NO. SP-046-77 LOCATION: Property is located approximately one-half mile west of East Valley Highway, midway between Olympic Pipe Line - Mobil Oil site and Longacres Race Track. The subject site is also situated just north of the City's 20 acre wetlands area and just west of the Springbrook drainage • channel. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests special permit pursuant to the City's Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance to allow removal of a portion of the existing fill on the southerly half of the subject property and placing it on the northerly half of the subject site to obtain an overall site subgrade elevation of 14.5 feet. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval subject to conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on July 5, 1977. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on July 12, 1977 at 9:10 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1 and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #3: Existing Topography Map Exhibit #4: Drainage Plan Exhibit #5: Cross Section Map Exhibit #6: Access Warranty Deed Exhibit #7: Letter from Public Works Department, dated July 11, 1977 Exhibit #8: Letter from applicant, dated May 23, 1977 Mr. Smith reviewed Exhibit #7 which recommends installation of a two-foot berm around the site following filling operations to provide 50-acre feet of storage for storm water. The Examiner entered the following two exhibits into the record: Exhibit #9: Application to King County Hydraulics Division Exhibit #10: Letter from Olympic Pipe Line Company, dated July 7, 1977 SP-046-77 Page Four 8. A Flood Control Zone Application has been submitted to the King County Department of Hydraulics Division and the Department of Ecology; however, approvals have not yet been given by these agencies. 9. Existing zoning on the property is H-1, Heavy Industry. The applicant-stated that the future plans for the property are for office and warehouse uses. 10. The proposal consists of removing approximately 83,000 cubic yards of existing fill material on the southern portion of the site for deposit on the northern portion. Upon completion of the grading and filling, an average elevation of 14.5 feet will result. It is estimated that the project will be completed within two months and that eventual development might occur within one year. No paving or'import. of fill . material will occur in this phase of development. 11. Substantial landfill projects have occurred and are occurring in this general area. The proposed design generally conforms to the design of these projects. In general, the elevation of these projects is approximately the same as proposed for the site. The Department of Ecology and King County Hydraulics Division design standard of an elevation of 21.8 feet in this area is being re-evaluated and is expected to be revised. If the revision does not occur, the applicant stated that measures would be taken in the future to meet the standard. 12. Lying along the eastern boundary of the site is the Springbrook Drainage Creek of a dedicated 40-foot easement. Past precedent has been established in this area (e.g. Glacier Park Company landfill) to require a 60-foot from centerline setback for landfill and grading to enhance the Creek drainage and wildlife habitat. 13. Two other substantial drainage channels border the site. The P-1 Channel lies along the western property line, and the P-9 channel along the northern property line. Directly adjacent to the south property line is located the wetland area owned by the city. I 114. After review of the drainage plan, the Public Works Department recommended a dyke 1 system around the perimeter of the top of the fill. The applicant expressed 1 agreement with this modification to the original proposal. 115. Plans for stabilizing the banks of the fill and grading were not submitted; however the applicant stated that hydroseeding of the banks would be utilized for that purpose. I16. Adequate access exists to the subject site via what would be S.W. 27th Street for the temporary purpose of access for the grading equipment. Olympic Pipe Line Company objects to continual use by heavy equipment over this shared easement. Lind Avenue would be connected to S.W. 27th for the purpose of this access. 1 Permanent access will be resolved in the future. ; 17. Section 4-2303.2.C.• requires approval by the Examiner of the eventual use of the property, which would reasonably include the final site plan. 18. A safety fence to enclose the project was not felt necessary (Section 4-2311.1) . ! 19. Section 4-2311.2 specifies that a 75-foot setback of grading from the property 1 line may be imposed. This was found,unnecessary due to other conditions being applied to the proposal. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposal generally conforms to the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan. The goals listed on page 4 of the plan are met in this initial phase of eventual development. Specific compliance will be determined during review of the proposed 1 site plan. The objectives outlined in pages 5 through 7 are also met or can be met as a result of the Examiner's decision. 1 Areas for greenbelt and wildlife habitat purposes are encouraged. Compliance with the Soil Conservation Service requirement for 2% of the site for wildlife can be achieved as well by maintaining a greenbelt of 40 feet along the eastern property line coincidential with the Springbrook Creek (total of 60 feet from centerline of the creek as implemented elsewhere in the area) . This drainage channel should be hydroseeded if regrading occurs (Section 4-2311.2) . A mixture of coniferous and deciduous trees would also be desirable for planting to provide the animal habitat and enhance future landscaping, installed during final development (Section 4-2311.2) . Only the hydroseeding is required which will result in character similar to that on other properties in the vicinity. 1 • • SP-046-77 Page Three Mr. Tripp indicated that while he concurred in the major recommendations in the report, he was concerned about setback requirements designated in Item P.1. of Exhibit #1. He reported that he approved of recommendations to establish a dyke surrounding the property and to .hydroseed the slopes. In regards to access, he indicated that the intended access to the property is from Lind Avenue through a 60-foot easement. He reported that completion of the grading within one year would depend upon the timing of the issuance of the permit and weather conditions. The Examiner referred to Exhibit #10, letter from Olympic Pipe Line Company, and asked the applicant about the use of the access roadway. Mr. Tripp stated that the concern originated from these of the company's private roadway located between Lind' Avenue • and the East Valley Highway, and he indicated that he did not intend to utilize the • private road for access. • Mr. Tripp stated that some additional fill in the form of crushed concrete would be required to bring the elevation height to 15 feet and that buildings would be flood- proofed to that elevation. The Examiner asked the applicant about a temporary access agreement with Longacres Race Track and other properties to' the west. Mr. Tripp reported that although Burlington Northern Railroad owns property to the west, he did not have a 'formalized agreement from that property. In response to the Examiner's question about the present condition of Lind Avenue, Mr. Smith reported that the street would require additional fill. Mr. Tripp stated that no problems exist for access to the property for the proposed project. He reported that hydroseeding the slope would improve esthetics for planting purposes and the 40-foot setback requirement would set aside 4% of the property to meet the Soil Conservation Service requirement of 2% for landscape wildlife mitigation. In response to the Examiner's inquiry regarding the contingency of the issuance of the special permit upon approval by the King County Hydraulics Division, Mr. Smith answered affirmatively. The, Examiner referred to specific requirements in the Mining, Excavation • • and Grading Ordinance, Section 4-2311, 'relating to landscaping and reuse of the site. Mr. Smith stated that when development occurs, a reuse proposal would include requirements for setbacks, landscaping and type of materials. The. Examiner asked for further comments in support or opposition of the application. There was no response. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith for modifications or additions to the staff report. Mr. Smith indicated concerns regarding improvements to S.W. 27th Street, additional fill required because of sloughing conditions, hydroseeding subject to departmental approval, removal of existing fill on the south half of the property within the 60-foot area from the centerline of Springbrook Drainage Creek in relationship to South 27th Street, and the possibility of additional right-of-way requirements. The Examiner asked for further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on Item #SP-046-77 was closed by the Examiner at 10:45 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: • 1. The request is for approval of a Special Permit for grading and filling pursuant to . requirements of the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance (Chapter 23, Title IV) . 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this, matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full herein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official, provided suitable mitigation measures are taken. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development and no adverse comment was expressed. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. . All existing utilities except water and sewer are available and in close proximity: .7. The Comprehensive Land Use Map indicates the property to be Manufacturing Park. A greenbelt designation is given Springbrook Creek, P-1 and P-9 drainage channels. • SP-046-77 Page Six Final approval of the proposal by the King County Department of Hydraulics Division and Department of Ecology of the Flood Zone Control Permit. 7. Final approval of the uses and site plan for the property by the Hearing Examiner after conducting a public hearing. 8. Erosion control measures for utilization during grading and filling be approved by the Public Works Department to afford maximum possible protection from siltation of Springbrook Creek, and P-1 and P-9 drainage channels, and the adjacent city wetlands area. 9. Resolution of_permanent .vehicular access to the property be accomplished prior to submittal for approval of the final development site plan. H.O. Suitable dust control methods be utilized, including watering of work areas per approval of the Public Works Department. ORDERED THIS 22nd day of July, 1977. L. Ric Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of July, 1977 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: James Tripp Frank Jacobs • TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of July, 1977 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti _ Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before August 5, 1977. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision'of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure,. errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is-governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such ,appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, • or same may be purchased at cost in said office. • 1 b d SP-046-77 Page Five 2. Section 4-2303.2.B. of the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance requires that the Examiner conclude that the Special Permit ". . .not be unreasonably detrimental to the surrounding area." Based upon the evidence submitted in the hearing, the proposed grading and filling is compatible with and similar to existing landfill operations in the immediate vicinity. Since the project will occur in a drainage area, some conditions to the Special Permit are necessary to control erosion, mitigate loss of animal habitat, and facilitate water drainage. These conditions will make the Special Permit not detrimental to the adjacent properties and surrounding area. 3. The P-1 and P-9 drainage channels require protection from sloughing of landfill into the channels, thereby reducing their drainage effectiveness (Section 4-2313.4.) . This can be accomplished via hydroseeding the banks of the landfill and perhaps ' "stair-stepping" the slopes (Section 4-2311.2. ) . Furthermore, the landfill should occur entirely within the boundaries of the site, not in the drainage channels or Springbrook Creek easement (Section 4-2314.) . 4. Drainage of the storm water that will accumulate atop the fill can be accomplished several ways. The Public.Works Department's suggestion of dykes around the top and perimeter of the site seems the most simple and reasonable solution. Such a system will provide more than adequate holding capacity for recharge into the landfill. Upon submittal of the site plan for final development, this drainage plan will again be reviewed as revisions will be necessary. 5. In order to help control dust and erosion, the entire grading and fill operation should be hydroseeded except where existing vegetation is retained. 6. Per Section 4-2303.2.C. the final uses and site plan must be approved by the Examiner. A public hearing will be required, and the Examiner must conclude that the uses and site plan conform to the Comprehensive Plan and are compatible with the vicinity as well as applicable zoning requirements. - ' 7. Sufficient access to the property exists via Lind Avenue and the easement across Olympic Pipe Line Company property for the proposed phase of development of the property. Only slight grading is necessary to implement this access. However, subsequent phases of development will require re-evaluation of the access. Olympic Pipe Line Company is on record opposing regular, continual use of the improved road in the easement. At this phase, only one-time 'access onto and off the subject site is necessary, but future improvements (filling, paving, construction) will require continual vehicular access for heavy and light equipment. The applicant is actively pursuing the future access, which must be resolved prior to the Examiner's review of the final development site plan., The proposed development of what would be S.W. 27thh Street should be investigated by the applicant with the Public Works Department. This improvement may meet'the future, permanent access requirements. DECISION: Based upon the record, findings and conclusions, the grading and filling Special Permit is approved, subject to: 1. Forty-foot greenbelt area of existing vegetation be set aside along the eastern property line. Any fill in this area is to be removed and the area regraded to the grade of the drainage channel and hydroseeded. The toe of the landfill will. not extend into this greenbelt. Existing trees shall be retained in this area. 2. Filling not to occur in the P-1 and P-9 drainage channels. Any existing fill in these channels is to be removed and the area regraded to the established grade of the channel and hydroseeded. Existing vegetation is to be retained in these drainage channels. The toe of the landfill is to be within the subject site, and the grade hydroseeded and constructed to prevent sloughing of landfill into the drainage channels. 3. Interim storm water retention be accomplished via construction of a two-foot berm around the top and perimeter of the site. 4. The entire regrading and landfill be hydroseeded as soon as possible after the completion of the grading, except for portions where existing vegetation is retained. 5. Final approval of the engineering design and supervision of the grading and filling for compliance with the requirements of. Chapter 23, Title IV, including the annual license by the Public Works Department. RECEIVED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER U1, 11977 PUBLIC NEARING AM PM "71819110111112a t243441516 JULY 12 , 1977 F '1IBIT NO / APPLICANT: TRIPP — HARPER 5 I� I t, .LV1 NO P- - 7 7 FILE NO. : SP-046-77 , SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests special permit pursuant to the City ' s Mining , Excavation , and Grading Ordinance to allow removal of a portion of the existing fill on the southerly half of the subject property and placing it on the northerly half of the subject site to obtain an overall site subgrade elevation of 14 . 5 feet . B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : JAMES TRIPP AND JAMES HARPER 2 . Applicant : JAMES TRIPP AND JAMES HARPER 3 . Location : Property is located approximately one-half mile west of East Valley Highway , midway between Olympic Pipe Line - Mobil Oil site and Longacres Race Track . The subject site is also situated just north of the City ' s 20 acre wetlands area and just west of the Springbrook drainage channel . 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property : 25 . 5 acres . 6 . Access : Temporary access for filling purposes is proposed by verbal agreement with Long- acres via the access road along the east side of the horse barn area . Permanent access for development of the site would be either the proposed South 27th Street extending westward across the Valley from Strander Boulevard , or via a cross street from the proposed Lind Avenue (There is presently a 60 foot easement extending from Lind Avenue to the subject site between the Mobil Oil and Olympic Pipe Line properties . ) , or extending into the subject site from the future Longacres Parkway . 7 . Existing Zone : H-1 , , Heavy Industry. 8 . Existing Zoning in H- 1 , heavy industry; M-P , Manufacturing the Area : Park District ; and G , General Classification District . 9 . Comprehensive Manufacturing Park with greenbelt designa- Land Use Plan : tions for Springbrook Creek channel area and proposed drainage channel project area . 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . Notice was also mailed to surrounding property owners . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: To prepare the site for future industrial or commercial development . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF JULY 12 , 1977 PAGE TWO RE ; TRIPP - HARPER, SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE , SP-046-77 D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was originally owned by Glacier Park Company . The property was later bought by Shell Oil Company, who proposed the site for a petroleum storage distribution facility . Shell Oil Com- pany elected not to proceed with development of the site and subse- quently sold the site to Tripp and Harper. The southerly approxi - mate one-half of the site was filled by Shell Oil Company to a height of approximately 18 . 5 feet . The northerly one-half has remained in a grassy pasture , partially wetland area . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The southerly half of the site , which has been previously filled , is level and at a height of 18 to 25 feet . The northerly half, which is proposed to b.e filled and graded ,. has an existing elevation of approximately 11 feet. Approxi - mately 4 feet is to be shifted from the southerly portion of the site to the northerly location . 2 . Soils : Woodinville Silt Loam (Wo ) . Permeability is moderately slow. The seasonal high water table is at or near the surface ; runoff is slow; and the hazard of erosion is slight. This soil is used for row crops , pasture , and urban development . Some Puyallup Sandy Loam (Py) may exist on the westerly portions of this site . This soil has moderately rapid permeability , slow runoff, and slight erosion hazard. This soil is also used for row crops , pasture , and urban development . 3 . Vegetation : The southerly half of the site , which has been previously filled , contains various species of scrub grasses that have regenerated subsequent to the filling process . The northerly half of the site appears to have been previously pasture area and consists primarily of grasslands . There are scattered cattails indicative of wetland situations and a scattering of small cottonwood trees . There are a number of ! significant cottonwood trees and vegetation adjacent to the Springbrook Creek channel along the easterly edge of the sub- ject site . 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water: Most of the vegetation on the site seems to indicate a general absence of surface water. However, there are certain areas containing cattails , which would indicate the possibility of surface water during certain portions of the year. The site , however, does not appear to be typical wetland area of . the type similar to the City ' s 20 acre wetland area directly south of the subject site . The existing Springbrook Creek channel flows along the westerly boundary of the subject site . 6 . Land Use : The site is presently entirely undeveloped . The • Olympic Pipe Line facility and the Mobil . Oil Company tank storage distribution center are located to the east of the subject site across the Springbrook drainage channel . Long- acres Race Track is located north and west of the subject site ; the Washington Horsebreeders horse auction facility and offices are located about one-fourth mile west of the subject site . The City ' s 20 acre wetland area and 39 acre optional wetland area is situated directly south of the subject, site . The proposed P- 1 drainage channel is located along the westerly edge of the subject site with the smaller P-9 drainage channel located along the northerly edge of the subject site . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF JULY 12 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : TRIPP - HARPER, SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE , SP-046-77 F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS . The subject site is located in a transitional area from pasture and natural wetland area to the various industrial and commercial uses . Glacier Park Company is presently conducting filling operations south of the subject site and has plans for future platting and development of that area . . G . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : Water and sewer facilities are not located directly adjacent to the subject site . There are facilities serving the existing Olympic Pipe Line and Mobil facilities east of the subject site . Significant utility extensions will be necessary for future development of the subject site . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . Any future development of the site will be subject to the City of Renton standards . 3 . Transit : Not applicable. 4 . Schools : Not applicable. 5 . Parks : The subject site is directly north of the City ' s 20 acre wetland wildlife preserve area . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Chapter 23 , Mining , Excavation , and Grading Ordinance . 2 . Section 4-713 , H- 1 , Heavy Industry District. I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan , June 1976 , page 4 , Goals , and pages 5 through 8 , Objectives . J, IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS : The subject proposal will disturb present soil and vegetation condi - tions , increase storm water runoff, and may affect drainage patterns in the area . Traffic and noise levels will be increased by the pro- posed filling and grading operations . Certain impacts may occur to the City ' s wetland area located directly adjacent and south of the subject site. K. SOCIAL IMPACTS: Filling the subject property will provide a step toward future develop- ment of the site to higher intensity uses . There may be some indirect social spinoff effects on such future development. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended ( RCW 43. 21C) , a declara- tion of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal (see attached ) . This is based upon the previous EIS ' s prepared for the large fill project presently being conducted by Glacier Park Company south of the subject site and is further predicated upon the proper development procedures in accordance with the City ' s Compre- hensive Plan and other City requirements , and provision of suitable impact mitigation measures similar to those provided by Glacier Park Company . f i • it PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF JULY 12 , 1977 PAGE FOUR RE : TRIPP - HARPER, SPECIAL .I'PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE , SP-046-77 M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A vicinity map and site map are attached . N . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . King County Hydraulics Division - -/,ah.o ivdA- 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3 . City of Renton Utilities Division 4 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department 0, PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYISIS: 1 . The subject property As partially filled to an elevation of approximately 18 . 5 feet within its southerly half. 2 . The northerly unfilleld portion (elevation 10 - 11 feet) of the property will be filled to an elevation of approximately 14 . 5 feet by removing approximaltely 4 feet from the existing southerly fill , thus creating an overall elevation of 14 . 5 feet for the entire site . 3 . The Department of Ecology and King County Hydraulics Division have established the elevation of 21 . 8 feet as the critical flood protection standard . , Thisl height (one foot above the 100 year flood level ) must be met for any new development by either fill - ing to this height , or by a combination of fill and flood proofing of the buildings . The applicant has been advised of this require- ment. The area is presently zoned (H- 1 ) for industrial and com- mercial uses . 4. The property owned by Glacier Park Company lying south of the subject site was the subject of a similar fill permit request of a much greater scope . The special permit for the 300 plus acre area wa,s approved subject to certain conditions on November 19, 1975 , and October 13 , 1976 . An environmental impact statement was prepared for, that proposal . The analysis and con- clusions contained in that document can be applied to the sub- ject proposal . As a 'means of mitigating certain impacts of the fill and to conform with the City ' s Comprehensive Plan , Glacier Park Company donated 20 ac, 'es and reserved an additional 39 acres for wetland preservation programs . Springbrook Creek has also been preserved as a 120 foot wide greenbelt/wetland/storm water retention area . 5 . The applicant has not submitted any plans for mitigation of the impacts of fill . Retention of the Springbrook greenbelt should be a condition of any filL permit for the subject site to provide mitigation measures siimila'ir to those provided by Glacier Park Company. 6 . The subject site is located directly adjacent to the proposed location of the P-9 drainage channel on the north and the P- 1 channel on the west . It may be necessary to excavate portions of these channels abutting,' the subject site to retain a proper balance in the drainage pattern for the area . This would be considered an interim[lmeasure to assist in reducing drainage impacts on other properties in the valley . 7 . ' Temporary retention/sedimentation ponds will be necessary to reduce impacts of drainage 'lland siltation on the Springbrook Creek and adjacent wetland areas . • 8 . Proper erosion control methods will be necessary on the slopes of the proposed fill . 'I PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF JULY 12 , 1977 PAGE FIVE RE : TRIPP - HARPER , SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE , SP-046-77 9 . A hold-harmless agreement may be necessary to release the , City from responsibility of any drainage impacts resulting from the proposed fill . 10 . No public access exists to the site at the present time , although a 60 foot easement exists from the site to Lind Avenue . The applicant has also attained a verbal access agreement from Longacres ' for the filling and grading opera- tion only . 11 . No plans for site development have been submitted with the subject request . 12 . Temporary drainage plans were submitted in written form. Detailed temporary drainage plans should be prepared to reduce any off-site impacts from the fill . P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : Due to lack of proper access , specific site use , and suitable impact measures , the application appears to be premature. However, to off- set these elements , approval of the subject request should be subject to the following conditions : 1 . The portion of the site within 60 feet of the centerline of the Springbrook Drainage Creek shall be retained in its natural state . No trees or vegetation shall be removed or disturbed , including , but not limited to , the large cottonwood trees near the easterly boundary of the site . This requirement is to conform to the Comprehensive Plan indicating a greenbelt designation for this area and to assist in mitigating the potential drainage impacts of the subject proposal by creating additional storm water retention area . This shall include removal of existing fill on the south half of the property within this 60 foot area . 2 . Interim drainage plans with detention/siltation ponds suitable to control potential drainage and siltation impacts on adjacent drainage channels , wetlands , and other properties shall be sub- mitted to and approved by the Public Works Department at the • time of annual license application and prior to beginning the project . 3. Final approval of proposed fill and grade by King County Depart- ment of Hydraulics Division (State Flood Zone Control Permit) . 4 . In view of the lack of specific development plans for the sub- ject fill proposal , the lack of adequate public access , and the proximate location to establish wetland and greenbelt areas , any specific site development shall be subject to site plan approval of the Land Use Hearing Examiner. Permanent on-site drainage retention facilities shall be provided at the time of site plan approval . Setbacks and landscaping shall be consistent with the M-P standards . All setback areas shall be landscaped a minimum 10 feet in width with plant material suitable to enhance wild- life food and habitat . Landscape plans for site development shall be submitted at the time of site plan approval . This shall be in addition to the Soil Conservation Service requirement for landscape wildlife mitigation on 2% of the site . 5 . The area to be utilized for the P-9 drainage channel shall be retained in its natural state. 6 . Suitable erosion control methods shall be provided , including proper hydroseeding of site and slopes subject to Planning Department approval . 7. A hold harmless agreement shall be prepared which would allevi - ate any City responsibility for possible drainage problems caused by the subject fill project. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF JULY 12 , 1977 PAGE SIX RE : TRIPP - HARPER , SPECIAL ,PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE , SP-046-77 8 . The toe of the slopes shall be placed entirely within the : subject site. This shall include removal of fill material presently existing on the City ' s wetland area adjacent to the south . 9 . Suitable temporary access for filling and grading shall be provided by written agreement , subject to approval of the Public Works Department . Access shall not be permitted across the City ' s wetland area . The Public Works Department shall review the need for dedication of any portions of the subject site for future right-of-way purposes and shall require dedication , if necessary , as a condition of approval of the annual license application . 10 . Suitable dust control methods shall be provided including watering of work areas . • . ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div . �� Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div. FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) , SUBJECT : Review of ECF- as0 -77 •; Application No . : - p1.6--77 I Action Name : 1 v, kiav ey- e,c_s�-�( rervn;l _co v. 'c, R ,4 (jyc L€ 5t�J oc-G, _77 Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : 6 -2, 2-- 77 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : (BCD& Comments : .---- ,c, ..--e_1„9--,-, :7,e c,......,_.r .....,,,ei-- - Sign e of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : !.�/..7 /lefirii-t-��j' 1(i/7;,,- Comments : , v),h ,/c „It. .,,2erc:�7� 1 PIA I _26.9-77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 6-76 (OVER) REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Arcs— 7 Signature of Direct or Authorized Representative Date , REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • Department : f 2 /�,/ L.-�'/ e Comments : . , • Signature of Director or Authorized R /presentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments :: • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative — Date • lI (-1/ , -i4 -, _-aI' 1:::-_i '-7---,°i'--- - - I- ' - - i' r Zl li 11 i I.\_ F-- J _ A 11L� 1 -1 I- _1 L I ' , 4'_--..--,1- i jv. lo, •IQ' i • ------" 'ST --- - —'RI" - Cr r.ErJRV MEADER DO1 TIOhCLAIM - - i� Z I x l _ ^I J ��1 1 \ Q o r, , 1 1 O I -. rt 1 d• • • • • • • . . . • • J°••'•I•••'••••'••'••• I - -- -----_-- - _ i1 T• • • • • • • • • • • I O. * I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • O • • • • • 1I• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 I I • • • • • • • • • • • • "I rlu, ME i DE 1Ji>,.1AIi, /., • • • • • • • • • • • • 1( 1 7 • . ••••••••••••••• . M IMP PL 11 • • • • • • • • • • • • l‘ • • • • • • • • • • • • , I f • 0 • 01 • • • • • • • • II •••0••'•••'•'•••'•' •• •••• 1 • •• • •• • •• •• •• •• • •• •• •• 1 ' • •• O •• O •• •• •• •• •• • • r . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • . • • • • • • • ....... Ilia , _ i � ._._..1._. Ile9., . I 1 0 ___ , 1 . . _ ., i , , , , 1 1 . 1 [ . ,. _____________ ___ _. . , , - - - ____ _ _ _ . _ 1 , J . 'I I - 1 1 L -1 74-,,-„_ f � f 1 l I F 1i F• ' .a �) I ,z „ 9 1 w V I T 1 SPECIAL PERMIT : ;' TRIPP - HARPER; Appl . No., SP-046-77 ; Special Permit to Fill and Grade in H-i Zone ; property located ,approximately one-half mile west of East Valley Highway, midway between Olympia Pipe Line - Mobil Oil site and Longacres Race Track. I . APPLICANT TRIPP - HARPER TOTAL AREA ±26 acres Via 60 foot easement from Lind Avenue S.W . between PRINCIPAL ACCESS- Olympic Pipe Line and Mobil Oil Company properties . , • I EXISTING ZONING ' H-1 EXISTING USE Undeveloped r PROPOSED USE Future industrial or commercial development I , . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN ; Manufacturing Park 1 COMMENTS 1 I ?,vaI Mge 7r7ELINe r ...P _ • ..........- • I S.:Me.., I t I®�. 9 • .. . • • • m o 0 0 • • •° °v:a. •"•• .. . ..° .• . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • a C J • 0 0 • a 0 a 0 0 O O • a • • O O • • • • • • O • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 O 0 0 • 0 • o o a • • • • •, • • o o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • - .% a ee°o°i 0ae0 0 0 . •°.o°i 0 aao aaaaeaa00 aaa0 aaaa0o aaoaaaeao• •7 • • 0 • 0 • o e 0 • a • • • 0 • • • o • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • o • • • I ,.•""""~� 0 00•°00°0 o°aa°° oaoa o•°•°•O..5 S as•5•.aaof oaaof•.a°°a•°•••°:e O 0 • 0 0 • o o • o o • • 0 0 • a o • • o • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • o o • • 0 •S 7 a o 0 0 0 0 0 • • • • • 0 0 • • 0 0 • • • o • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • 0 0 0 • 0 • o • O o 0 0 0 0 0 • o • . • e o • o • • 0 •,• • • O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • o • o 7 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 0 • • 0 • • O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • o • c • • 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 m 0 • • • • O • o O 0--da/♦1 • • • • • ° • 0 • • • • • O • • • O • • .pd 7 O O • • • e O O 0 •Q-^ ^ ' ^ ^ ' ^ ^ ^ - - O O • • • • • • • O • . • • • 0 a O • • 1 t • O O • O 0 0 O 01• • O • • • • O 0 • • • • • • • O O • • O • 7 0 0 0 0 • o 0 0 0 • 1 , 't. O • • o • • ° • • • o • 0 • • • 0 0 • • 1 y ° • ° • 00000 • • Fyy�. j? .• r"; • • • • • . s • • • • • • o • • aoao • 0?�� 7 . 0000000001 ,t ��� t' . ° ° . . e • . . . • . . . . • o • a • . cgy y 0 • m • o • oo0 • 0 " ` FF77 C""r• • • • • a • • • • • • • • • • • ma . . mr 7 O O • O 0 O O O O O 1 • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • e • • • o . • cVI i oo°00 0 O 0 00 S%. - - _ - _ - - - .�iaaaaoi•�aas•�aoa aaa c IA •p1'pd, o • 0 O o O . • 0 • 0 0 o e • 0 • • e • • • • o •-••• e e • • O • • • • o • • • • • e 0 • 0 • • 7 • O ° • e ° O O 0 O O O 0 O • • • O • • e O O • • • O • • • • • • O • • • • • • • O O • • • O O c • • o 0 0 0 • o 0 0 0 0 0 • o 0 0 0 • • O . 0 • • • • • o • o • • o • • • I • • e • • • o,r e o e J • • o O O o O 0I0 • O a • 0 0 • • • o • e • • • • • • • • • • ° • • O .!, • • a • • • ?• o o F e C �aL • • o o • o 0 0 o a o 0 0 • e o • o • • • • • o • • • • o o • • • s f• •1 • • • • • • S, • 0 0 �oApt2 i�I 7 0 • o • 0 0 • o ° o o . • o o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ° • a • . • • o a Y'•Lr o e o • e o 0 0 o e o • O e O o • • a • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • o • • • r ,• • . o i o o • • e o • • • 0 0 • 0 • • 0 • O • • • 0 0 0 0 • • • • • • • • ri..0 • eo a0e• o 0 0 • • • • 0 0 0 0 a o • e • o • • • • o o • • • • • • • o • • o • e a o o • moo • • 0 m e • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • °`"'• • • - .6.a. l'• O o 0 6 o O • o • o 0 0 0 e o • • 0 0 0 • • • • o • o O • • • • • • • • • o • •'+• • • • • • �`• • • o ° p� , p 700 • • • oo 0000eoo0 • • - • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • 0f • •:r • • o • • • • • o • e /14644� ®f /0) °°•oa0.°oe :°0•oe•eoee°•°aaeaoaaea00•:eaaaaa i.aa ,r •eeeaa- e0 e:ec 0 0 . o o • o 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 • • o • o • o • . • O o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 1 0 • O O e O O o ° O O 0 OI O O O • • • • O • • • • • m • O O • • • • o • • • • • O • O • • 0 • • c V [,,y w • O O O O • 0 O • 0 O O • O • O • • o • • o • • • • O O • • • • • • e • • • . • • e • • • O • • O V. .`r'R 1 O • • O O O O O • O • O Oo• • • • e • • • • • • • • 0 O • a O • • • O • • • • • m • e • • e O 0 C 000a0 0 0a00 0°0 0 0000°aa•°oeaaa00aaoeaO• O.O.0 S OsO O�ee•Y•e•e00 • • • O o ••m0 o0 o 0•0•0 o 0 e 0 0 0 m 0 o 0 e 0 o••e e o o•o••••o••m•••••••••••••••o••-•••••-o••••••o•o•••••••o•o••o o 0 0•0 o•0• l 00 0 0 0 • o a' o 0 0 • l o e • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • o • • • • • • o o r • 0 • • o • • o 0 0 • • 0 0 • • • e • • • • • • 0 0 • • • • • - 0 • • e • • • a • • • • o • o o • 0 0 e 1 • • • • • • o o • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • o • • o • o o • • • • • • • • 0 • • o • • • • . • • 0 • q� •00:•0oaoa• ••aeaeea•••••o aaoaaaaae:°°a a••••••a oao•0•• •.o • o o • • • • o o • • • 0 • • • • 0 • • a o • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • ° ° • • ,• • O 0 • • • o o • 0 0 • • o • • a • o • • 0 • o • • 0 0 • o • • • • • • • • • o • • • o • 0• 0 0 0 • • • • • 0 o 0 0 e • • • • • • • • • • • • • • o • o • 0 0 0 • 0 0 . • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 • I) ta ••o 0 0 • • 0 0 a e o O • • 0 • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • 0 • • • • • 00 • et • o • o o a • a o e • • •10 •qa. eeeeee'ee-e e-tlf• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • e e • o i • • o o e o • o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • o • o • o 0 • • • e o 0 0 0 0 • e • • o • • • • • • a • • • • • o . • 0 0 o a • • } • • • m o • o o • • • • • • ,>,F' - e • o • o • • • • s • • o • • • • - o • • 1 �,�, o r • o 0 0 • o • o • o e • • �� /0 'aaaaaoaaaaa0ee•ieo°v i°o°°ao IN .0•.•0°•5oo°oe0 aao e 0 0 iea e 0 0 a aao•°•eaaaaaoe o° 0 ° 0 • • o o • o o • o • • • 0 0 • -1� - - - - .�o • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • 0 • 0 0 Ot ao aai 0 0.0.0.00aa i 0 S aaoaa0i aaoi• e ai ai i 0�oeao•e0ao aaoeo 0°0' • 0 0 • • • o e o 0 0 • e o • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 0 • e • O 0 0 . • • • a • • • o • o e e o O o ilia • O o • o o • 0 0 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • 0 0 • • • • • • o • 0 O • o • • 0 0 0 O o • • • • • • 0 • o m 0 o e 0 • ° • • • • • • • O • O • • • • • • • • • • • • a • 0 0 0 0 • o o • • E�!�'%�9 . • • o 0 0 • 0 0 0 • • • • • • o • • • • • • • • • • • O • • • o o • • • • 0 0 • • • • o m o a o O • O • 0 • 0 0 • o o • • • • • • o o • • o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • O • • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 eaam°° 0 0o°0e.e0o°°°ao aae••• •ereo•• •°oaO°•e•e•e•eaoe•• •°•°•e•e•ea0°°i°o°oeo°o. J" C2310 o 0 0 • 0 0 0 • • 0 0 0 0 • • • • • • - OSSSSSSSSSSSSSOSSOOSSSSSSOOSS 0 • 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • O • • • • • • 0 0 • • • • • 0 • • • 0 • 0 • 0 . W. a 0 0 • 0 0 0 • 0 • • 0 0 • • 0 0 0 • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • 0 • 0 • • • • 0 • 0 0 0 • • 0 0 0 a 6 ,�, • 0 • 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 • • • a • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • o O • 0 0 • • • • • • O a • • 0 0 0 a 0 • v. ®/1,41�,y, a•.•e°°00e oi ea°ae ••e••••000i ao aa0a•.•O aaac a0°•00 0.0°0•°a00°0 0' �• S� a 0 0 0 • • • • 0 0 • 0 •1• • 0 • • • • •��0,�0, • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 0 0 0 • • 0 0 0 a 1 P•• • aaoi°•°•°oeo ie•eoa•e•e��/�•"iroe•••o oeaao•ea•e•eao°•°o a0 a•°•eo°0•ee0°•0 > • • • • • • o • • • • • • • • • • • o • e • • • • o • • • 0 0 0 O • i Gala fi "ry'+G•53 :��'i-• "1'414;:'+:',:V.''' ` ;N'' a.'erac'�"" a7,,ox.1 5 .,:in..*, A-, .t qiki� Y s M Pib M ® ' it k'. t / / w , 4s weic.AND 5 Gsr1 i / 6,cfAen uislTo, /`1 p, t eb 1If i t � / / i i 0,1 I' I 1 . I 5'CALE /tZ001 [ ' CjeliEllr Silt iN5i T'LIPP— NAriePgR Sp'c"• pagmif NO. 0p_®46p-77 11, PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NCB. SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SP-046-77 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-250-77 EX FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant requests special permit to allow removal of a portion of the existing fill on the southerly half of site and placement of it on the northerly half of site to obtain an overall site subgrade elevation of 14 . 5 feet . Proponent _ James Tripp and James Harper Located approx. 1/2 mi . west of East Valley Highway, midway Location of Proposal between Olympic Pipe Line-Mobil Oil site and Longacres Race Track. Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to 0 have x® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is pis not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : Declaration of non-significance has been determined on the basis of mitigating conditions proposed in Planning Report to Hearing Examiner report dated July 12 , 1977 . Conditions to include : (see attachment ) . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent -or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an ,extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue. a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Plan9pg Director Date July 5 , 1977 L i ' e Si gnature ,- � j City of Renton Planning Department Ii Attachment: Declaration of Non significance Application No. SP-046-77 Environmental Checklist No . ECF-250-77 Tripp - Harper Special Permit for Fill and Grade July 5 , 1977 Page Two Conditions : 1 . The portion of the site' withlin 60 feet of the centerline of the Springbrook Drainage Creek shall be retained in its natural state . No trees or vegetation shall be removed or disturbed , including, but not limited to , the large cottonwood trees near the easterly boundary of the site . This requirement is to conform to the Comprehensive Plan indicating a greenbelt desig- nation for this area and to assist in mitigating the potential drainage impacts of the subject proposal by creating additional storm water retention area . This shall include removal of existing fill on the soluth half of the property within this 60 foot area . 2 . Interim drainage plans with detention/siltation ponds suitable to control potential drainage and siltation impacts on adjacent drainage channels , wetlands , and other properties shall be sub- mitted to and approved by the Public Works Department at the time of annual license appli at.ion and prior to beginning the project. 3 . Final approval of proposed fill and grade by King County Depart- ment of Hydraulics Division (State Flood Zone Control Permit) . 4. In view of the lack of specific development plans for the sub- ject fill proposal , the lack of adequate public access , and the proximate location to establish wetland and greenbelt areas , any specific site development shall be subject to site plan approval of the Land Use Hearing Examiner. Permanent on-site drainage retention facilities shall be provided at the time of site plan approval . Setbacks and landscaping shall be consistent with the . M-P standards . All setback areas shall be landscaped a minimum 10 feet in width with plant material suitable to enhance wild- life food and habitat. ' Landscape plans for site development shall be submitted at the time of site plan approval . This shall be in addition to the Soil Conservation Service requirement for landscape wildlife mitigation on 2% of the site . 5 . The area to be utilized for the P-9 drainage channel shall be retained in its natural : state. 6 . Suitable erosion control methods shall be provided , including proper hydroseeding of site and slopes subject to Planning Department approval . Attachment: Declaration of Non-significance Application No. SP-046-77 Environmental Checklist No . ECF-250-77 Tripp - Harper Special Permit for Fill and Grade - July 5 , 1977 Page Three 7 . A hold harmless agreement shall be prepared which would allevi - ate any City responsibility for possible drainage problems caused by the subject fill project . 8 . The toe of the slopes shall be placed entirely within the subject site . This shall include removal of fill material presently existing on the City ' s wetland area adjacent to the south . 9 . Suitable temporary access for filling and grading shall be provided by written agreement , subject to approval of the Public Works Department. Access shall not be permitted across the City ' s wetland area . The Public Works Department shall review the need for dedication of any portions of the subject site for future right-of-way purposes and shall require dedication , if necessary , as a condition of approval of the annual license application. 10 . Suitable dust control methods shall be provided including watering of work areas . OV Et PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT o WARREN C GONNASON, PF. 0 DIRECTOR AO MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 206 235 2569 0,p4t D SEPit°O • CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • July 12 , 1977 Mr. William B . Gillespie , Division Engineer Division of Hydraulics King County Department of Public Works 900 King County Administration Building 500 Fourth Avenue • Seattle , Washington 98104 • bear Mr. Gillespie : • This is in response to your letter of June 22 , 1977 , with regard to the application and plans submifted to your office by Tripp-Harper for grading in Section 25 , Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. The applicant has made application to the City of Renton fora mining and grading permit in accordance with the City' s ordinances In connection with the application to the City, we will provide for the right-of-way for the P-1 channel to not be filled as well as the P- 10 channel on the northerly side of the proposed grading . I feel that the • best approach would be to notify your office once the City has gone through its process and approved the mining and grading permit . At that time , we will advise you of 'the detailed conditions that we would like attached to the Department of Ecology permit which is issued through your office . Yours very t.x�uly, • ' Warren C . Gonnason, P .E . Public Works Director QV R WCG : cah RECEIIIEI) o� v cc: ��Planning Department JUL 13 1911 R. Houghton -e ------ ----�. • 4/A, • NG DES • �,a. .%'�'i .� a`Y,i • +t �.I. I.,` : ..F•'�t�.r'.�-y'y'i� ' ,:R}�� 1 .__...y,.;a•'"...s."',waLN.. Y-i� st •• •: o '.:' ,ry'JC � `L:� Y;'_ e J.3 ( :� a �.:r l ,�' ` .�r.a��...:.�4�d=L'T.'�t' �.:�.�:-: ..�awr.a.*.., ::�;��..:�:�:r�K err.°:� °•-,,;;;:T.,:. ' '�' t... 1 - ( ,, . 'I. ,*/ Pf_CF.NED — '''. . . • 1,..•.3 \ e WAiI1 TY o>~= 9 JUL 8 1cy ; The Grantor. OLYMPIC PIPE LINE COMP ,rip ela- ,`$`. ware corporation,. for and in consideration' of the s ' 52 LPC.1 1 [ Ten Dollars (810.00) and other good and valuable considers- 4 titan. in hand paid, conveys and warrants to the Grantee. 410 MOSIL OIL CORPORATION, • New Yorkcorporation, its ounces- t sore and assigns, the following described'real estate. c. '� "' ' situated in.the County of King, State of Washington' si.ivain That portion of the northwest quarter of R E6€ M i ?7�wem .A the northwest quarter of Section 30 Town- ;• 'ship 23 North, !tango S Bast W.M., described ' %. t.' ii al ---- ' I I Commencing at the Northwest corner of said • "'V^ .riTrDni w. Section 30; thence South 0749'10" West, f [3 along the West line'Of said Section 30, •a 1' distance'of 1e0.01 feet to an intersection T7 i with,' line parallsi to and 100 feet �1�� .Southerly. measured at right angles to 7 D -7,1 ‘ iI Is).i iir.IJUIL , •.y Y • the North line of said Section 30: thence 7 South 69'52'Ol' :Cast, parallel with-maid S !� '� / North.line. 20.00 te.t to an: intersection " i}j if E -- with a line parallel'to and.20 feet Easterly. 1 aeasurid.at right angles to the West line "`ill t t ' `S of said Section 301 thence South 0'49'10" 4 5 West along said parallel line 554.32 feet • li ���,��� .to the True Point of Beginning: thence j��a, • 3 ,' \ South 9t'2d'48" East a distance of 903.21 %7 ' feet to a point on a line 70 feet Westerly. 1' 1 tc LIE measured at right angles'to the Bast line Cv SALES. TAX LIEE of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest P .A `r�D/ • Quarts:. thence South 1'3S'1�2" West, parallel to said Bast line. 217.71 feet to a point of curvature of a curve to the right of radius. • ' '3 7215Z . 344.265 feet: thence Southwesterly along f _. ;- !3 said curve 369.79 feet to a point frog which pp .the center of the, circle of said curve bears • CV II '( '! . . . South 26'52'12' Bast: thence North 88'24'48" . ✓ • West' 716.02 feet to 'M point on a line parallel i ' / • ' to and 20 feet easterly,of, measured at right • io:.i14�1/I i 1s”i11ii.n.i .angles to the West line of said Section 301 , , 'Ci;Pew vle 4 thence North 0`49'10'Bast along said parallel t j +•f line: 520.05 feet to the True Point of se- ��' ginning and containing in all 10.33 acres. i, � �No. more or less, BUT RZSERVLNG,unto the Grantor. '.rSh�.L7J, ' s F DO141n f(F1f'rpm • — . • + 11 `p SAY 9- 1967- • 3. fiED 6r -CNTI , , • 'I .a.ts.,''y4hil- 7v"i.:i'4::: 'ZGY;tt..1461..WVs,11.7. „4F132.am . .`A+'altaiNI&+catn.r.'wnarixxivaswiiwmsnasv.:tias .:Vart man..n,m,u.u..:,...w.ae.nmwago,,.¢w.ftr.. ...T,,.........w,.......—.. „a, ,.,... w.,, •n-.:,,•, twee.,.. 1 • y 1 t cit. successors and assigns a permanent 1 i easement for road purpose/ over. across and upon the northerly 30 feet thsrsoft 1 , Ps N TOO*'fIRK with a permanent non-exclusive use- ). OW meet for road purposes, for the benefit of . 1 ..p the property conveysd over, across and upon the following described teal property of , Grantors. situated in tha County of King. , • Mate of Waehingtons (1) The southerly 30 feet of the fol- • lowing described property situate in the north- west quarter of- the northwest quarter of • Section 30, Township 23 North, sang. S Ease, W.N. 1 • Commending at the Northwest corner of said t Section 30/ thence South 0'49'10' Wise. • • along the Meet line Of said Section 30. a distance of 180.01 feet tolan inter- . ' • action with a line parellel Ito and 100 action / ' - .• feat Sout .rly.. ..masured at right angles to ' the,Werth line of Said faction 10; thence ' uth Sg'32'01' East:' parallel with said • ; t • •' -RECE /IVE®- Wow lam. 20.00 foot to an j intersection + •'. with a line psrallel'to and 20 �leet Easterly. . CITY OP RENTON• smasuXXsd.-at right angles to the West line E I; i ' HEARING EXAMINER of said...otics! 30, maid point being the Tsui Print of leginningr thence South t ,I U LI 1 21977 .9•42'0l7 inst. parallel and-'190 feet t PM Southerly of the North line of said section, . 1 i • f� a distance of 110.13• feet toe a point on a t N' 191IQr1iN12i1i2Nrle4r p61in. 70 •feet Westerly, esasured at right, •ogles to-the East tins-of•said Northwest 0 , ; •'i Quieter Of tb. Morthwe,t Quartarr thence - t F t . .. I. r•1 .. • ,.� Sends 1•,3s'lY Me.t,�"D.r.11.i to said Last lime. 577.01 !eet, t .nc. North 88'24'48' • '• Meet°a distance of S03.21 fait to a point . i :,• •. one a line jerallel.to and 20 feet Easterly. . qi . . . ef. iiseurrsd'at right anglss.to the Nest 8 Piai of said Section 30, thence North , i .a t'•0•4$'10• Sant. sling said parallel line, , y•' ', ' • • 114.32 feet to the True Point of Beginning. .. •7;• Q, _ --)".(2) .A i0 foot wide strip Of land in the I. northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of 2 Notices 25, Tors►.hip 23, North. ,Range 5 East. • LII. described as follows, j ' C1V ` Co�sncinq ae the Northeast corner of said Section 2Sr thence South,0'49'AG" West. • 1 ��i along the East line of saidlSactlon 25 a , c p,L.l1'i rb 0 distance of 150.01 feet to en interaaction ! re '� with a line parallel to and 180 feet rAr !.' EXIIBIO.t - - 4/ _ � • 0. . • , - d.....s4w.ti: sv„. r•.xy,.:v,*e��...,...nta .rso.nzmcsmusd..i.. ,.,... .,....e••r".---.. .,y.. r�.vgn-.. s.4,; •.A'se:.�,r.......,5,, —T..,^.:.,,�,, 4li .>., t Y .. • ail i ' �" ill, *, , Nadsrly. asssurrd at right angles to the worth line•of 1�aid Section 25/ thence • 1 forth 07'12'59' Melt, parallel with said North line. 30.01 feet to an intersection with • line parallel to and 20.00 feet Masterly, measured, at righ't-angles to the +� last line of said Section ,2S11 thence South °4) 0.49'10" West along said parallel line ' • 314.14 test to th. True Point of beginnings thence forth S$ 24'40' West a distance of i • '! 1027.40 Nett thence South 1.01'19' West r • a diatanoi of.50.00 feet, !thence South M'.24'40' laet a distance'of 1027.70 feet, thence berth O'49'10' last a distance of • 60.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; • WiilCT TO s ' (1) Declaration of ►rotective.Covenants • • dated febsuery,16, 1965. exeeuted by Glacier Dash Company. a oorporation,land recorded 10ardt S, 1965, asder,Auditor's rile be. 3652490, ' rice de of Eine County; (2) lssasvatiOnl and exceptions contained . ' !a dead dated August'12, 1963'ftom Glacier - ;x ' priw Chispeny, a Opsporatioa,; to Grantor. re- T. osided Lu Volu'. fo. 4690 of Deeds. Page 290. ,�` faosads of Stag Couftyt •- ` •(3) leeeosot for power.Line transmission a. aver'a portion of the proPerty conveyed, as trantaf by iastrlreent•datSd February 14,, 1966 %y . is faros Of Puget'Sound to er and •Light Company clad sikorded March 1', 1964 under Auditor's rite • • •• la. 5996725. records of Xing County. . ;4 ,•.. . , ' • .SOf 111i'lSHO 11RPO/, !;siaid corporation has caused of ;, this last:ii.nII to be executed by its proper officers and 1•: it. oesporiti seal tei bi hereunto affixed this 24th day I 1f6 j.. - a! Jainism • rum. C L NS COMDAwPT • k.. �� tea. ���' . . / _ • • • '�a I RECEIVEb�7�o (",. ft. ,. ^� •rem ides ( '?i Attests r?i_ ,�j �s. secatary JUL 8 1977 1. �9*. ` _.....ate.:._...�._. ' .L _ , _ + I ,,iitt P #c� '1 V. �. ..,..ei r`h../ .)"..,. .•• `.� .Y •♦ ''{. F J` yam • ' • r. •1. 4 •. e.:...:'t,t.p #s:arAV,V'.w:+i4,41,.tu._4"..-::.0 - uv.•con.-.0 L11g1 20V15, -.,or011.13+1'curs,.....15,:" iwamiJaiawywatwmc... As:ft,ra.. -....m..•.*.. .,.,.. ,;, ,p••. col��. •f`5J � f -t.y 4 r�i ti''� e 2, . . _ ., II , • STRTI 01 TEXRE ) IIl I . . . I ) .SS, j . I ,. f COoamr or Dallas ) •I On this 24th, day of .11 Janusrl , 1961., . N before sun, personally eN Y appeared Ives H. True and 1 `D L■_i, Irsnsler , to we known to be the President and /1 .' • Secretary, respectively, of OLYMPIC,PIPE LIMt COMPANY, the . corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and ; acknowledges'•the said, instrument to,Ibe the fres and voluntary . act and deed of said 'oorporatlon. for the uses and purposes • therein mentioned, and on oath stated'that they are authorized I to execute the said inatra �t and Chat hat the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporatioh. veal i/i eqy bund'and official seal hereto affixed ' time day sad year Civet above written. • ' • iii esiimbamwirisw Notarylic'in and of r the State of ' Jens1.1tN Texas,' residing at Dallas• n., asp=aaia.macs wow , t 'io.d r srs �os.Tam' �� .� . ate L • (C..):''‘i PACij\l. 64.1 . - ith; , AI., LL . .. I. rrrwrN ry..rq,� � r III I.r A , ; G 1)t 1?, ` • • V-''anti 1' 11:^r:I''k'''''''!.d"_ .". 1 •, ♦ y6,E,. �,r,....), :.� e, • • , , GItANI'i OF FASLH1.a'1' FUR AND 1N CONSIDERATION of the cum of lhtee 'thousand Five Hundred Dollars 11 i ($3,500.00) and ocher good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby .0 acknowledged, MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, a New York corporation, hereinafter referred JD to as "Grantor," hereby grants, bargains and sells to SHELL OIL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, a non-exclusive easement for road purposes to be used in common with others over and across the following described real property in the County of King, State of Washington: That portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 30 Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.H., described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 30; thence South 0° 49' 10" West, along the West line of said Section 30, a distance of 180.01 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to and 180 feet Southerly, measured at right angles to the North line of said Section 30; thence South 89° 52' 01" East, parallel with said North line, 20.00 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to and 20 feet Easterly, measured at right angles to the West line of said Section 30; thence South '0° 49' 10" West along said parallel line 554.32 feet; thence South 88° 24' 48" East a distance of 903.21 feet to a point on a line 70 feet Westerly, measured at right angles to the East line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, said point being the true point of beginning; thence Southerly parallel, to said East line 30 feet; thence easterly at right angles to said East line 30 feet; thence northerly parallel to said East line 60 feet; thence westerly at right angles to said East line 30 feet; thence southerly 30 feet to the true point of beginning and containing in all 0.04 acres more or less. SUBJECT TO all reservations, restrictions, conditions, easements ;.. and rights-of-way of record. 1i 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed hereto and this instrument to be executed by its Vice President and Assistant Secretary thereunto duly authorized. DATED this 9th day of SepLunber , 1974. MOBIL OIL CORPO ON �� RrFjy By L'�...//`l-4,-.2 c_/ CI` RECEIVED � Vice President A. H. MA$5AD. By ` JUL 8 'I9Ti' Assistant Secretary G..O F-f O1 -o ' NG DEPpR :.'...'�.. :r. INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date July 11 , 1977 TO: Mike Smith, Planning Department FROM: Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Department SUBJECT: Tripp-Harper Fill We have reviewed the attached drainage plan which does not really tell us very much since there are no acres shown. We assume this is a 25-acre site. In lieu of the system they propose, we would suggest that a two foot (2' ) berm be placed around this site after filling. This would provide approximately a 50 acre feet of storagefor storm water which would be more than adequate until such time as the site is finally developed. Also the water could also perk through the fill material and recharge the drainage basin. —z RCH:pmp • RECEIVED p CITY ®F FtENT®N i HEARING EXAMINER rpr'11• \ JUL 1 21977 ,�'� AM PM ,� 71819110010W12A3e4o5a6 231 12 .1377 /G DEP Pxre EXHIBIT NOa ITEM NO '6 —17 S.F.No.4418—OS Form F. 1 ' FLOOD CONTROL ZONE APPLICATION NO - ' Dated , DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Washington Regional Office. 15345 NE 36th Redmond, Washington 98052 (1)*APPLICATION is hereby made by Tripp-Harper Phone: 235-1550 (Individual, corporation, etc.) of 324 S.W. 16th Renton, Wa. , for permit to grade and thereafter operate (Postoflice address) (Construct, reconstruct, modify) (2) and maintain future Light Industry or Manufacturing Park (Nature of works: Bridge, dike, road, revetment, logging works, gravel pits, etc.) (3) to be known as • (undes i gnated) (Name of works, structures or improvements) • NEl/4 of NE1/4 2 23 North, 4 (4) located in Section 5 , TownshipRange L) (W).W.M., (N, NWi ,etc.) 1 At S.E. corner of Longacres Race Track, Renton, Wa. (Location with reference to nearest town or well known locality) (5) all or portion of which will be located upon the banks or in and over the channel or over and across the flood plain of Green River , a tributary of Puget Sound (Name of stream or body of water) (Name of stream or,body of water) 1. in King County Flood Control Zone No . 1 (6) This permit is sought in perpetuity (In perpetuity; or, if temporary, state number of years) (7) Definite location and plan of the proposed works, structures or improvements are shown on attached sheets numbered • 1 • to 4 , inclusive, which are parts of this application. (8) Construction will commence July 1 , 1977 and will be completed Oct. 1, 1977 (Date) (Date) ' (9) Remarks: The work consists of 'removing 4 foot of pre-load fill from the South 1/2 of the site and placing it on the North 1/2. Exist grnd. elev. 10 ±, ' ' I exist fill on S 1/2 elev 18.5 ±, proposed site subgrade elev. 14.5 ± I :4i;;;-- •SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS - (Ap ant) —1"—±—g EXHIBIT NO. B ITEM NO. SP-0 4 - 77 . yGroup Four - Agent p ��y �e d p� {��ield Examination and Application Retained PERMITERrtieflYbylitl ..�JI�1 Report by for Alteration Recommended by Issued HEARllun .EXAM}), R . . Name JUL 1 2 1977 _ AM pm . Date '18191 t01111121_ 1 d 4.151.6_----------- ---- ----- .— ---— — — — -- — ,,,d.l ,3 I . LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Government Lot 9 and the Henry Meader Donation Claim No. 46, all in Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Section 25; thence South 0°49' 10" West, along the East line of said Section 25 a distance of 180.01 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to and 180 feet southerly measured at right angles to, the north line of said Section 25; thence North 87°12'59" West, parallel with said North line, 20.01 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to and 20.00 feet Westerly, measured at right angles to the East line of said Section 25, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 87°12'59" West, parallel and 180.00 feet Southerly of the North line of said section, a distance of 1026.07 feet; thence South 1°01119" West 1095.58 feet; thence South 88°24'48" East 1029.43 feet to a point on a line 20 feet Westerly, measured at right angles to the East line of said Section 25; thence North 0°49' 10" East parallel to said east line 1074. 19 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Figure 3a .. . '''':'-- • —10— • •.? ' . . . tri a•K r ' • • ,...•",-,-,-‘. ( 4b .... 11/4t,i' . \'\.* .... ..,...•••••••••••••••• ii1/4 d• _._.-.. .--.._ . MO • / • r • \1011"1111 k W. --..to ', .'4'.. 111 s'"i.. '!. ' ,:.' 's. :-- ,' dt,. %% .4', 't s• \\\............... .... , . 0, ,er ,vt.. .......„. . . , . . ,,,,,... . ler---- WIN . - .%*33EiValtr AZ:rate;,•' " , '.,..,.....::.,.-,......• ., •.,. , ..r ., : 1 . ...,:: . ..0. .. . 4 ..:; / (1) . 4-.) . s. 4'00 ' ,i ; I lb I ' • . r. 1 . 41' I 1 C: CC 0 i t 1 I i I . .., '• . , 0 ' 0 4 1 . . \\.,1 . 4;:,;'C' • II). A.' ..011. 1 I .'• , 41101,;Fr,ti-_,;.1„;;;;:-..0'. ...._.. ... • ,, • /;;...S : • . , .c.;cz,..6.1':' '' ,_ .,., . ,,,,ekl.r,Adini ........ .... . . . , . • .'• I cp\t‘ •••,-,-;,'..- --- '-'- ., " . ,•, ; ! •1- • : ...:, ilki,.,,,7,1,..;,',041.1111111,'1' • ," -..N. .5. ,. •aa.graarida.d.c• • - ' — ., ..• • , 1 . _i. , • .,':',,,Pe.r'' r. f*" . • '.. AML • ,.• .•..•. • , II e \ 51 r HILL , • . 1,. ,.., 4s,, .r, po:',.,..,.•,.., ,• :,• , • • El_ , .0' . I?ig, niniZan..V..''.,L• 4111 • . - , ..604.1.............itni:di . ,1 ; 4 • : . '-• • -, . . • s— 41 1 ce.. . . , i 6, ' "" ' I-• • i 0 V 1 >- ,CITY LIMITS . C;j1 -.1- .0-,.• : ........... ........ t : .' .' .—1 t! - g • . 4 'TUKWILA • • 1- 4/ . .... . ••••1‘...011610111011111i. • 0 >. . • ••• . . .i • .R IENTON 4 tij W ...I . 1..,........_I. . . . • : ..(yi " ...•.. ' . . .. . 1 1• . • 1 1T A 1 . . , •• ... .. . . . . •,,„,.:n,'...,:.,:•.;, ,,,.„.• ..1„ ,•? .,-.•, • legend' CITY . OF RENTON • • . . . ' CIRCULATION ELEMENT PLANNING DEPT. . . I • . . ,. • ' em22:2. at) l i Artera § . FIGURE • . • , r • 7s..li.,..— Collectors . . . • . . ..,, . . Freeway Interchange . . . • . . . . •• , . . . . . . . . . . , . .. .i . 1 ...:'---------------.4.--------'4./ . . , .... GREEN • RIVER . VALLEY • . ,„.f. i• , COMPREHENSIVE PLAN • - •• .sciiI0 1„a 2000, . , ,J.;,.- foppir! J', . l', • ?\ 40 , 1 ___ ri �.\dry.�' d ...2,\, Z. . ' v: ,, ,, Ilii t . i. 1 ., . ; ,,,,::::,.,„:„:,:,::::,:::„:,:,:,:,::,:„,..,„,:,:,::::.:::..... „4,,,..,........::.:::.,::::.:..........:::::,,,.:::::::::::::::::::::,:,:::.:.::,::::::::,::::., , \- .,,.....:........w,,,,,..„,„. ...::::::::::::::....:::::,:,.:::.::::.:,::::::::::,:.:.........,,,............„,,,,,,„.. \,,,___,,__ __ " ' s'' ' , ., 1111 °P . i---- .1., „„,..„ 2, , el 4. N.,;:•••..........- irr f' t w' ,,,,,,,s0r . • t, • •. .... X;:::::::::::::•••••••••• 1' Y 1 r1e.r A.•h.:• S F,r•IL•1'y.�cr'i•e ` y:•I:r::'.:::''' '''•,• '•,`: - . L.—,� � . gyp''. ,,•:,,•:r ••' .:!F,c'i t; � . • - ._'ti'r, & i rr.�,r W•':��:• .. afvil `;C}':.:,..:.;. ry,l y' __ -�• i'N`A r IF�g (.!r 7' F - !Ali ,�::::::::.;::: ::':1::*.;:4::".4:i'.G•1•;:::::::.:,:. :• ••.::,::::::•:.,::.... 4, ;; ;: omouo� 3: m ©rcao �o1, ..A. .6'; • { ' /' o Y oao 0 o i�: r • .. I ........................ti,,,., lT °fo< eye®o - -• •0 I Oil 4 0 rDC` l• 11 1 oa Doom,' eoe,; f 4: .s0000 ;'' ':. e! Y'' -Ib 9®eElb •OE ' ;fir f0 , ; , , �, ::_ 1 : ao�evvv. ov f1 r • 7.1,t�, 'k�ta L ,,.. : : ' • 00000e000e �Yt'- ,, HILL '). :',., iii„ . ...:„......:„.... .. , , ii, - OObObON004 ! 'a ::::::....::: ...:.:.:. ::A]1 •'r� l �W'K,. eo toeo I.• T�} qtt ,, ,• ..::::.......::::.:.:.::::....:.::::.......::..,.:::...„.., „... rM, i o'ooaoevvo00 1iati;+• ;'1c +[•:•+ {, 1 Y+q ,ll b tS.,O.ir 4C•ir P ,1 t tf y N▪ �., 'Y-` 1, � _ hy° doowoo�oo,`. a0 ,4S :it9"t; : Axle • II,, ' !!•( •Alk •S*1T.•Mn cr ' it4::' :.::: ::.: {:: {::':•::;' ::-W'_ {.+,, m.mf :;43i' L ,3 • :: , d.! �" ' t � -m, .®. _.,..e'.•is ';f4�• ;: i dal •:-M .t CITY. LISr >t:^ • ::'4 f 4gNt d :g. r�' IN'. '} '1 I E 1 1 : tk i s •�fs2 t J E. r• ..::::::::r....:,:,:,•::.::,:,::•::::::.:::::•:,•::•:::.:::•:.:,:•:::.:,,,,,,::::,,,.;.::::•:.. > is . A . S 1 Y". 4 i d• ��2 . • •r • i f 'v ' ,:1, 1' :7. I pp '� I' rir°• ti'•r Y •Y • OPI: � I/ K E N T ' . [ . 1 dlegenci•: CITY ®F REST®N LAND USE ELEMENT PLANNING ®• EPT. '+ • • ®omso®o `'1' Manufacturing Park• ....cocoacoccab' Recreation 1 `'?6,''t .:- Commercial a�'°"�; Greenbelt IIIIICILIIMMCIFEW Drainage Channel 1u���*,W= Public %. • aor :id�a4u a • F GRCEN RIV • ER VALLEY r I i ; COMPREHENSIVE PLAN scale " = 20�' e h Nvr/4 be. Section 2.5, T 23N.,,Q.4E,14!M. �" N87° /2'59"W 24 1 19 25 iI 30 ri 1:h, . . -.... N87 /2'59"W /� ' ,►- t 1046.08 ..t 1 ,... I . ..., , j -.50' Ppe/ie Easemen>• Q I ,I I c , :U I . D -.w`J ., A . . i . . . ' ' Average Elev. 10.D �^ -:• "}•J, • I C — —...—.. —. —• • 60' Roadway Easement -z:. �,% :F: ¢:•a I . . . h 20'Oroi q. :. o D/!ch RN A Average E/ev. /B 5 . . , O jtil� 1.1{.j i , RI. ! 0 1 1 /029.43 I '-, �... N d8°24'48"W . • , • La. See f urn 4 Sections. ' Out�m US C. �`G.s. . • J/TE 'AAA, �_ GROUP FOUR,Inc. IPPL/c,41/ON• NO 19707 94th Avenue West PER MIT No 1 , i. Lynnwood, Washington 98086 • 206 775-9581 • ,/I /URYIYINS NNWINiEAIMi PMMMINY MAbIA/1114 E /TO A/' �/Qil f AG I (`.;- N: i DRAWN BY Vd .5.5'77 CHECKED OY APPROVED ®Y J�a.'Y n/ f/�T /VV ic/G�rE , , .. "• 'I .:_ ,_..... , 1 . • • . 1 . • • - f$q . ...:, IN ‘'' • , J. i . , , ; •f.-, ; , : -...Z. , Emitify fill ,.. * : ' -,'1 di :it -4,-•'-• • , • 7 i,„----Ave. Reg /11..5 L • ,.. , 2 . --Proposed 6rorie /45 . I . . , I 0 . , .', , 1 ' S.-7-77(t/AF Ns , * --..--Ex/sinif Ground ...,ri : ; ..': , :,r' . ! • , • • . , ' Ave ilex /D.0 , , „ • . • 3 .-., f,:— ifli rTi ,:i,. rt.,- — • . • ,... ,-..t.4.,,,,,,t,Alr.,, 4 , ! . . , . 1., it •.. . " . , L... i. : SECTION A-A , 1 • ',1 ..1,:. ,, . • , , , , , . . , .. „ • . : . , , ; -r • r , . „ , • . ' t.'.:•-•;;.';'-i.,- ..i . ',I, .1‘::4i•-;-: I- , , , ' ' . • , (.-.-'-4-**fr 7,..}. :HI 1, , ' ,, ,• : ! , . ' : • . , • :'" I: : J ,..,; . . . , 11. , ' " • i , , , ;•;,..;,;-.4.4,,,t'vin. . . , ... . • • ,- , . .. . , . . . • • ..... ., • ,•:..; • ,, -r.4,,,,i,,r+4,.,..tr. • ".*;';:!,a,:'.;.4•'. - , , 1 I l'"L'i•', . IN. • I -,, ,n N 1 R•5 , •'' l' ' 7//ited rn ,t, • • .. ' • ; ,-,..., '-44 1'' I • , '.... 1. 5.0.--a-7 1 ....--&posed Grade (Reonekv. /1.5) • ' • ' ..--.,-4,..1-i-tt4 , il -. ', : • , , .. • . , .,-,! --,t,..,,, :.•4-,,, , e,,, , , . , ,,,,.,-:,_,,,pi,,,,c..,„,.. ,.,, f• • . ; : •: ...1: • • I I ---///2.--///•=70-= /- iii. /// , kr - - -----r-i--'--:-.i Lt-X/ ///2.9 6.rood-----. , jvc.Elev. 10.0 -_:-. •t,..-.-...,9_ , 1 ...N.,-... .4- . SECTION D•9 .:'1,•,: ,i';„ , : " ,...I, ' - : . 1 1 7 : • , , , . . • . i•,1,,,..,,-,,.4-.1.." , , . : '1,•;:l r::: , .i. :. • ,1 i . „ • . . , , . , ., : „ , ! - -,:: , :. ,.: ; .••:.;.t.,:.:'i... :i*.444,1' :1:, • 1 , i '; 1 ' „ ... I •1 GROUP FOUR9ItiC. ' RRPLICAnow Ala. ! 1., 19707 44th Avenue West ,,, , I Lynnwood, Washington 98036 • 200 7754581. ffeeM/T Na. ,.., , .+,i. .....m. EINBINSIMINCI " PiAPINIIIII IdANAleinitter . . . .•', 01/ ORE 4 .-•' DV il .5%5•77 CHECKED NY APPROVED NY RENTON, YaeH1NGTON R OLYMPIC PIPE LINE COMPANY P.O. BOX 236, RENTON, WASHINGTON 99055 July 7 , 1977 City of Renton Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue So . Renton , Washington 98055 RE : ' TRIPP-HARPER SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL AND GRADE FILE #SP-046-77 Gentlemen : It has come to our attention under the subject permit j application , Tripp-Harper intend to use our private road from East Valley Road to gain access to their property in order to accomplish this work . As this additional traffic could possibly create a safety hazard , we are not in a position at this time to allow the use of this road for this purpose. We are , of course , willing to discuss with the applicants the possibility of using the road in a specific instance on a limited basis . 1 Very truly yours ,, A G- ;(/:;2- G . W . Williams , Jr. Manager fECEI ED GWW/sw CITY OF FIENT,. .1 HEADING EXAMIr JULY 1977 718,9110ollrt21112i": 1 I i • EXHIBIT NO./o Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. 'arlys Hoefert being first duly sworn on she chief clerk oath,deposes and says that is the of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) _ times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and *.L NOTICE OF - has been for more than six monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred ,F-y PUBLIC HEARINGto, printed and published in the English language continually as a news RENTON LAND USE • paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, HEARING EXAMINER and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained RENTON,WASHINGTON at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton A PUBLIC HEARING Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE Notice of Public Hearing HEARING EXAMINER AT Washington.That the annexed is a HIS REGULAR MEETING , IN THE COUNCIL CHAM- BERS, CITY HALL, RE- NTON,WASHINGTON,ON JULY 12, 1977, AT 9:00 as it was published in regular issues(and A.M. TO CONSIDER THE WING PETITIONS: , not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period 1. T R I P P HARPER; SPECIAL PERMIT FOR One , FILL AND GRADE IN of consecutive issues,commencing on the H 1 ZONE; file No. SP r it U 1 y ?7 046-77;property located approx. 1/2 mile west of day of ,19 ,and ending the ' East Valley Highway, midway between Olym pia Pipe Line — Mobil Oil site and Longacres day of ,19 ,both dates Race'Track: Legal de inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scription on file in.Renton scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee Planning Department. 153.3n ' ALL INTERESTED PER- I SONS TO SAID PETITIONS° charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ , which ARE INVITED TO BE PRE i has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the I SENT AT THE PUBLIC 1 first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent HEARING ON JUL`f 12, I insertion. 1 1977 AT 9:00 A.M.TO EX- I • Ci /I v PRESS THEIR OPINIONS. I • //1�G �� ��Q, p�.L. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN / 1 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR Chi n clerk Published in The Renton 1 Record-Chronicle July 3, Ill rd 1977.R4429 _ . Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of -- - t;uly 77 19 , . -, QF Notary Public i and for th State of Wash' ton, I C J iCf/0ss residing at Kent, King unty. (("JUL I2 —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June r .,�..�� 4977 9th, 1955. , 'y2 ., —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, 24 • �,, adopted by the newspapers of the State. G DEPARl‘1\ . V.P.C.Form No.87 S.F.No.4418—OS - r 'Form F. 1 . 1•`` FLOOD CONTROL ZONE APPLICATION NO - DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Dated Northwest Washington Regional Office . 15345 NE 36th Redmond, Washington 98052 1(1)*APPLICATION is hereby made by Tripp-Harper Phone: 235-1550 . (Individual, corporation, etc.) of 324 S.W. 16th Renton, Wa. , for permit to grade and thereafter operate (Postoflice address) (Construct. reconstruct, modify) (2) and maintain future Light Industry or Manufacturing Park (Nature of works: Bridge, dike, road, revetment, logging works, gravel pits, etc.) 1 (3) to be known as (undesignated) • (Name of works, structures or improvements) (4) located in NE1/4 of NEIJ4Section 25 , Township 23 North, Range 4 5.4 (W).W.M. (N,, NW?4,etc.) r At S.E. corner of Longacres Race Track, Renton, Wa. (Location with reference to nearest town or well known locality) . (5) all or portion of which will be located upon the banks or in and over the channel or over and across the flood plain of Green River a tributary of Puget Sound (Name of stream or body of water) , (Name of stream or•body of water) in King County Flood Control Zone No • • (6) This permit is sought in perpetuity (In perpetuity; or, if temporary, state number of years) (7) Definite location and plan of the proposed works, structures or improvements are shown on attached sheets numbered 1 to 4 , inclusive, which are parts of this application. (8) Construction will commence July 1 , 1977 and will be completed Oct. 1, 1977 (Date) (Date) •(9) Remarks: The work consists of removing 4 foot of pre-load fill from the South 1/2 of the site and placing it on the North 1/2. Exist grnd. elev. 10 I-, • _ . 1 exist fill on S 1/2 elev 18.5 t, proposed site subgrade elev. 14.5 ± ". •SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS • 6:7' .� (Ap ant) By Group Four - Agent . Plans Examined and Field Examination and Application Returned PERMITReported by Report by for Alteration Recommended by _I Issued Nalme Date \ __ Ili LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Government Lot 9 and the Henry Meader Donation Claim No. 46, all in Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Section 25; thence South 0°49' 10" West, along the East line of said Section 25 a distance of 180.01 feet to an intersection • with a line parallel to and 180 feet southerly;measured at right angles to, the north line of said Section 25; thence North 87°12'59" West, parallel with said North line, 20.01 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to and 20.00 feet Westerly, measured at. right angles to the East line of said Section 25, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 87°12'59" West, parallel and 180.00 feet Southerly of the North line of said section, a distance of 1026.07 feet; thence South 1°01 ' 19" West 1095.58 feet; thence South 88°24'48" East 1029.43 feet to a point on a line 20 feet Westerly, measured at right angles to the East line of said Section 25; thence North 0°49' 10" East parallel to said east line 1074. 19 feet to the True Point of Beginning. • Figure 3a 1 • / V -....._. T ' \, .�tY Eat nem,. ��'' ' I FS2.� • 4 411110pi , .: ‘., :-. ! .,-.,,- ..,.. , :., ,,,, •, % • �\ • \ Ii it y , • ...-L 4, 1--CT. 0�� t y t Oa la .GP,P.'.L.a.5"'" r "4:0) ....•. 5. -, I 4.1;1- , 4 Gr .,W .. 9 A, im ,, .; ' . ;^ ar' :.ems v Y .ti,; ,• -:{,.4?,1,tet...a.:.s::.ar..ta.r. :vsrt i�r_ 1 Zvi ' A..1. , 4 ,) `j Gib • 0. a�,., '' ji 7�7 r3 .;,s'sr.�.' r4:„.„,, „. )\) P, . • y P N A ='E a S4 t' ' ? , ' }t '}. t 0 ;ryes` 1 Al . •,. . ... -I . ) i . t. f _. ._ 3 (Ts yil % S1T�. I HILL `: • a Z s` `'':.h�XRi.,. 14i 0 •'��i n}YvY� ^v / R. t{. D \ • �•.11J�:tt1O' '�4y1�ii/'Li�43:'' Y\"� • .+ ..y. 1 M1, F Y' (J ,� ¢tv: Vf Y cia c - S;ciy�C. G$' 01 0 L)' )- s . U.Y. = ,:i P�£ -J CITY LIMITSrr}?l • Y, _] Asa ; I'r ems? T U K W I L A e�� ;* ' +�at• d� RENTON P� c was , w 04 a J i if,. ' rl • a. • I. t i it WIt 4,• C t t0" Sw. 43, ST m na.fi i:., _v't ,,_,.. >zas.sead� >#>tir�hs lst,tz ,y.,• �$S'°frt(Ts\ . •I $ , l� .ems . : i» r • KENT O. jr CITY OF RENTON `',. , • CIRCULATION ELEMENT 'PLANNING DEFT .•s-t.1 . Wiz= Arterials � "" FIGURE 1 V. • 4t SY. • -�-P— Col lectors • 1 . • 1,� ,•',, • ® ® 0 Freeway Interchange :, r • r . .. . .. ,...... . . dn GREEN RIVER VALLEY ,,44 ' 1c 9MPREHENSVE PLAN „ , • k►s • 1 . ••••,- ...,6 N.) ....I..)— r [ ..... . . i . 1 Lli.1;11'1...11100 It•`,, P .., c':.•• '; 4 c3 ,,,,••'' ... t\' .....-.-t! --•":177:7:......... 01"1::: ...:•:::•:•:•:•:::•:-:•:•::::::::... N'''' ,,,,...... ' . ' ' ,i'—.•, , ,. .....- ,., ,.. ,. : „. , •.....::.........„......::.:::::::::.:.::::::::::.. ........,..::::.....................:.:.:.:.:...............:.. ,.,...,...................„„... , I • 1 \'''''-\--;:::—.......____---_...- \' . '':::::::.::•: ::..."....1:1,4:.s.".::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::.:-........... i k, - ----..--- C . ...... .!;'''::: ••••:::':::*.::::::::::::-:•:•;:::::::::::::::::::.:.;.;:::::::::::......5 - , tjt;c1:0\''pPrIN::::::::::::::'' '::::::::::::::::::•:•:•:•::::::::::::::::: . ,Y,'.. ..,:4..1,,,77. ,....:0:4„ ss , .-c:' 4 1 - --------- ." frz-iic,i,'2,-Svi.irei..N .....:•:•:::::::::.'::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;,4 ::::: .::::::-.:4::;;:„...:0:.„!;:,,•;.•,,,,,i, i . :••••••'.'"•'X'•-::•:•:::-:•:13t;t` :•.'•••' ."....t..••••••••••••••;•:•:':••••'•'•'•'•: ••s• ,•.• r•. ..... .••• ... ••4.,t-e‘t%14k1: ' . A- . ••••'•••••'•••••••••••••••••••••••':';•:':k,17:,:. '1"I'L., „,.-)."..0—',:t':*:':'::::•:•:••••••••••••'::::::I; ::•: :•:•.• :•:•*. -:::,..::..... ...,,..'cs..t,;iti:Isl,;: . : ta\ . .1: 'I, '''..../..*::::::::::::::'::::::.:'cLt'..t"izi,.., -V.::::::::::::::::::::::::•:: '• :::.* ;:;•. •;t: :::: :-...i...:,,4,c.:1',.?1%,,,, 1 ( '•:•:::::•.:•••••....,•:•.•,... .. ,..„,.,1,•r-:,.-: ,t....••••••••••:•:•:•::: ....! •:•:.t.-.• ••:-:;•::. ••-• •:.Ist:1'..;:AP2.ti` •••••••••••••':':"......•:••••••:. ;fr,,.-•-,.,e,a.',...„ .Q'' ..1:-:':':::;•;•:......':,**S.:: -,....if:*:".':',.; '.....1 .1:': ..;,t.,,,,,,...,,,,.,,,,,, s ‘,....'••:.:.:.:.:•::::::::•:.:•.• •:, 7,.. ......-,t, t. :•:.:•:••••••:•:.:•:. :•:••• ••••.• :•:•:•:•.••11:•:..........,,,,,,,,,.., . , , • .. N.............::::...........:•........................:.1.4.,:.(,...!..) ,• ;:.t.'6..e.;?.3„,t:::::.::':*:::::::::: :::::: :.:::. ................:::;........, ::::::..... ....., , 1 , .,,./.•:„.. ' •-. . • : ',.1, . 1. . .........::::::::::::::..0••,..,,,?;,y,„:„.„,,,,,..,.,,,,,,7,:r,..•..,ic:ef,,,,,:;\4.::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::i..::::.....f:...........„...s................ .........,,,o,:l.i.,,::::,.„;,..........::,;,.....:*,:::.t,:::;..................$ .a.-5.i:;...,,•••.7,',1•,,7•-'•,,,l'4:..iri.,1:°EUM',:ii:••••••••::::•.;•••••••••:',.;:::;;;;;,,,V.E!!!.::://•••:4:11' ;.%•:•'•:•'•• f, .._ I. •. . . 's • ---14%..: :::''',,.',i;;;.:,..x.;!?,:,''4'.1;;''.:47..:..;§'..4c.;?1.1,F.,....:,„.„.••:•••••;.;3.;e.,:t.7::•::. •,P,...-..t.:?. :'.....-.:: .i..r..i.:.:..t...::' • 411. „..F417: ' ''', 1 s • - • .. . ,.,. •• I. '-• '.------NN:::'.A..kt-s.'"...,,4,'L' 4'•..-•"::'''.'••••;••;:::::::." ::••••••••:::::::,••:.:::!;4•••• .t;t:t7o.,:6;74;1.43::-- ,mealli AI ,., ,.,, ... , • .....•.. ........ ....... ....... ......... . . - •-. !:-P:;::t:.-::• .....„..::::;:::i,,..::,:4--.....1...........-,Y:5,.-:.!::,:1; :.: :::::::::::::.:.,..).:.:.:.:.,,,......:...,44:„:„. .. .4.: . . - ,.,--.:-.-...:::::.::.:::.,,,....:44.::::.•,,,....,,,:' .n.'''1.......•••••-."......••••„:•,:',............4.:1:•=';:77:. :::::::.•::•::::.:::::::::::::::.i..i:i•::. it:4 . ••. , :t. ''.•'.' . ........':'•'•:.::,..4f':':::',.... 't':'. '''6''V'71 C 43'4,-,,I/..*•'•••••••••:•:•:•:•:•:•••••••'•'•:::•:•...'.;•;•;:::;•:•:•.•::;•:'•'..,;;;16,1...,`, ,•.',..,,.';•:,...,.....•••••••,e11.,,:•:40.4'f.e.:.'..,0,01 0 1" 0 t)0 0%Ill.....::::::::::....;.:•;•;•;:::;:::::.X.::::::................::::::::::::.: 1 ti?',I.,. I L. I.'1',"1.4,..4.4•41,,,V.::-:;>1),Y,' ',I 0'11 " '" -0'6'‘, ••.,•.•:•••••••.•:•:•:::•:•:•:-...:.:•:•:•:•:•...:•:•:•:•:•:•:•...:.:.:•:.:t.1, J:44 i r::::?;')'.44'‘,,,e...•••••'''',.:1?::::••••A P 0,.. *0(...'.0 0 0 tl 11›.;5;;;;;;;-:::•:-:•:•:•:•:•••::':::::::::.::::::::::::::::.:.:.::::: rft.:4,),....II, . i.-..,-:.T.:.'.L........,:,..,.„,.,:.::..::•::::...:.:: ..ltl::.:•::•:::::::-...:N....:....:..I.2:.1•:::::::::-:.•...:..:...::::::::.:a::::::::::::-..:..::..*.....::.:•::.::::::.:::;:;:::::,::,::::::.::::::::::::::.•::.:::.::.::.::::.?ra:.rk:,r.,,;,,,4h...:,,. • . , , .. , V . 11 0c e - -.- 40 a * 1 t.:.... ..'„ -:''.'.',;•,....1,/.......-;•••110000 :a a c..^0.:::N;•:,:/::::::..-.••••••:•:::::_______•.•-••••••••:•::::.;.:•;•:•:.:•:::: i ' ' .:.,• t::::44.....: ::- .,..1: /9 'a°c'°° '6''2 li.ii.....':':'.:71,1::,::7-.:Fikfc4k44-.:1::::-...:•:•...........*::::: fr„1::; !.. ..-1 C ( . I .:::::::: ::.:. :.:4‘..f.-' '°t1i 45 42 43.°4 2::?f,':::::::::.:.: ::3:,... ........C7.....,,,,*.*"..e•—,•::::*::::::::::::::::::::::: .•,,,, '11;44.1 1 , _ . , ..............:::.' ::::::. ::.?1•V °:,,,'.,'',7:`..-.A 0-0 v:::::::::::::: . 1031;% TA L a 0 r • • :t.'''''' :' A.,J 6 0..• • I 69 o ct :•;;;:*:•:7...;:;;;;,4itir.•';,:i.7 ..i,;•;7,,i,Aii_•-•—•"7,—,' ."'",'.1:1;;•.';',;ftgi•:'• , 1 v"g.;•;---, '-.;:t;".v.:Y.-:::::!tf:?F:f:!::-.';`..`::-.t..................:.::::::::4.:.. epst'cr,-O. t-vrt.•.• ':: ''' H I L L •— ...-'4,1-..:•1'--:•'• •l'Ai•'6 6 6°°6 6 6 6 6 6,:i•i::.:::::r.:::: ' ••••••••••::::::::::::::':::::,:::::::::::::•:::::.•.::::::::;::.,::::.; „it,m6-:,, . 1 ( ..•••••:4•‘;t,tsil 1171ift;-.6°°6**6 6 6 6'° -..t..::::.::::::: :::::: :::::::::.;.;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::4.:: t,vil-f:, ..::::::';,,,..;:it'..,.I,i4......or.o o.o=?; t:•:•:•:•:•::: :::•:::•:::::::::::::::::::::::::.::.::.;:.*:::::::i.:::$.::::,:. ,4.14 !.it; ! — a 11 l'•:•:•:•::::. ,,•:•:•:•:•:-...-„-••-•.•:•:•:•:•-•.•-•••-:•:••:•:-:•••41 .1,- . iiiii : ,,.. . .....s.,:•,,.h..........„,..,....„., ,,:::,...„..: )4•••<'.....4.:•t?",,...:,,, o o o et a o a a o o ett.k isf,';:,,;(!-.,.::11.1,..:!,7:,,%;'3:•:•:':'::•:•:•:::•:•:•:•::::........:•-4c),1•:::.. ,1, 4 . , . ,i,,..'111,.,"`"r',:al 0:J.'s 41,C.,0•01110.'jo P'''':':Iln.'Pa4,,A'';'.;kt,:',.,t':.::::::...........:::::::.:.....-:•:),V.:.:{::, A.,s......, . 1,..k.,;:.Vt.-,r1;,74."e""C""C'e C t•ii..;;L:'X.':1‘tli,Vt i•i'g}'Ai:::::::::.:".:::::::::::::::::::::::::.:0:1::::::.54.`,•)1 VA -.t: )5 f".0.v.L.41,11.,,ort..t7tlihi•;•;;'...rrpts.t.,:•.,...,.;A••••••:•:••••••••••••:-:•:•::.•...•:• •:•:-.•' 9 Epoit .i,:,:. i 4.,,,,-.l'Irt't,:11,:4Ft,"Y`:—' ::`, ''.--''''''';AV:',!%).•tii't AV 7i:ht!?;;,::::::::::•:•:•::::::.;...............:::•::. .-.....k -• ,q4, r•-• ///.:::::',',..414e1)" ::::::::ii;i::: :::::::::: :::111.7.171';bilil '' A:.'11....11::::::•::::::: : :::::i ::•:::•:.:•:11.4J: :.:.:1:::::•.?:::: 3414144* 7+ 17: ar1.1 M1-rs -11 r: , 4,.::::•:•:,,,•;,::: •,%•-.2;.;-, ::::::::.......::::::::::::::•:•:•::t4,:i:Ip.I.i.„4 p:i73iv:•:-:•::::::::::::•:::•:•:-::::::::::J1;:•::::::::::: ..emak I ( .::::::::-.:.:':::::!,0:::•"1,,M,i ......:;:::::::::::::::::.:ii*::::.:*:::::::::Kt:t'.: .!;. .,4;§.:?fit:.:t:•:::":•:.i:.:::::i*.-•::*i::.:-..::::.::::::::::g :..::.:-....:.::::::., ,,,,f40.4 :::::::::::::::::::::. ::::1;f-tfi'' i::::::•:::::::::•i:::::::::::.:•:::.:.:.:::-:.-:::i.".::*:".::::'•::*-::'•::-:*::-..5":"...-::::::::::::::.::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::ii::-...i:::•::::•::::Tii:.::::•::::::•::::. IL;19 -.I 6,,? ''' ,„:.*•••••• :::':,,„, •••:?;:liK.4.::::.:::::::1:::.:::).**:::.::::: !:::',::::::::::::::.::::.:":::::::::::•:::,:i:•••::,::.::tr)f,,:.:::.:if;;;, r 1/ \i5.ili./41a .§. .. :::!4F':::::::::::.:;.::::::.:S ti,,•,q• • 6' Al,_'?'21:::•;i'.:V,i ' ...4:i•-';.4:4.-1•‘..i.,1),:ef;••••••.*:.:.....;:.::::.:.*:::::::,:':::;ks'..;:i*:.:::.:,:i:?..iii:.*:•;:.;:.:: ::....i.....i.......:•....... ..s3f,.......:.:4 ir .., \ •. '4 4'47;1: 4* ::::.:;4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::%::.:::::::::::%:::.•::.:/..;::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::.i::::::::::::::......::::::::::.:::::::::::::::4:::,Ag.:9.1 . . , 4‘V&...}:.0::.i.I.:::::::-;'3,),r. :::::::::....:.::::::::::::::::::::::.......•::::: :::: :;;,''...:,. ..iii::::::::::i:......::::•::::::::::::::.iii.',....i.:::::::::::•?..,::::::::::..:1::::::.....1,, /„.4.?:3:m ... ''..t. c•,,q..74.1.:11.1."::"..:.::?..:::1:t'', .....:.::::::::::::::K:i*i.:"......::•:::::::::::::::::::.:::::::.:.:::.:::..ixi:.?.::..............:::::::1:..F..;Mu., • •••• i:V...".......:•:.::::::,:::::tr,::,.`•:::*:......:::::;::::::::::::i:;;"..::::::::::::i:.:::::::::::::i•::::•:.::::::::.;::::::::::':::.:1::::.:::::::::::::::::: ...;.:::,....;:. .; • ii... t•i:P4::::::j:"i`if.:•:::iii:.:.:A.7 1;::::.:??::::::::::::::::%:::::............ie ............:::::::::.;•:::.::::.::......:::::::.:.:::::::::::::::.::::::::::: ::;.....•.::.•::::::::1,;„,.. 1,P •k; 1 :'''''..:..i::1::::.:::'::: :.i.:::.:**-:6 1:•::•:•::::::::::::::::.:::::::.:: ::_i:.;>;,:f•:::::::•::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•:::::::::::::::::::::.••:::::::::::.:::.:•:.:•:.:•;i:::::::::::::.•:::::..........::::::::::::::: .......t If :::':::::::::::::::::':::::,:: i 1 '...:::?!irlii:V:7::'•*::::.:::.:::::.:::.::::;i,::::::4i.::.::::::::::::::::**i:::::::::::::::::.•::::::::::::::::::-.....:::::7. f., 1 1 1..ri.....::::::::::::::::1:14. ':V.'•;•:;;::;§..,.. ...:;>11",..1,..1.,,!'w,.;:44:,:,..;A:;',:cii.,;::,,;,::,‘.ket,krIz.A.1,14,,,a.Y, 4 • .. .. „ • / ____ K E N T • • , •;i.t , . , • ilt legend: • . CITY OF RENTON : .,.. LAND USE ELEMENT ! PLANNING DEPT. • I?, • 1 • . 10000000 .? . * 3.i... ,:•:::::::::::::::::::::::: """*"' Manufacturing Park Recreation FIGURE 2.0..0060 ) ... •-•'..1.4.101'..B Commercial Greenbelt •. • • , ,,, k.110VPS,Z, PI1 icel.,,,,e,-,4,1, Public 4"1"m2- °Enr° Drainage Channel . ! • • , . I mm------- • i , VALLEY . . . 1 1 GREEN RIVER '..'Y.COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ... . — scale 1" = 20009 4.'• ...—.— ..— . -------• .. ... . , Lk; ki -Nor/h/iie Section 25, T!3N.,,Q q£,lyM °` °`_ • j. N 87°/2'59"w 24 /9 ••- 25 (!30 • N8J°/Z'59"W /a46.08 z . Z lill l ` • -� : i /026.07 , -.50'P e/he Easexed---- Nr • ifI pc: Averageh _® • . • I ' + • � . • ...... — — — 60 roadway Easenaenl T ,7 . \ oo • oh. 20'Dram.ye D,1ch R//f Average E/e% 45 • • • O 2' • • • • r /02243 . . ... . :... N dd°24'48"w .fee f9ure .4 / sections. - Orifum U C.S �`G.s. , . • • • SITE .PLAN .. �� LT GROUP FOUR,Inc. •; 197074. 94th Avenue West �PPL/CA TID/U No. ,., , PERMIT No . A. Lynnwood, Washington 88038 • 208 7T5-4581 . I'Q NYIIV[YIN• [N�INIIKASNII PLANNING YIANMOIMIT Lr. DRAWN BY Y p. J�'S']] CHECKED Rr APPROVED iY /SENJON, JY,QS/8IVOTOA/ F/GUFF .5 • - • • • -...,C �. r --r-k --1.-i-_i.:_ _: O -I-` .---Proposed 6/nk /45 I - _ i _ • • • fie gel! NO - '. y = • _ . • SECTION A'A • • • 4 • • 7!, tr)o = • /�° P�opased Geode !Meant-ley; /4.5J i. • • f :��'.,: • Ews/i� G�aund • rrr • ; ,, Qve.E/ev. /0.0 • . . . _ '�� • • • AEC T 10 N B'B • • � :• • • • • s rt $ GROUP FOUR,Inc. APPLICATION No. : 'a 19707 49th Avenue West PeeMI r No. -...• Lynnwood, Washington 88038 . 208 775-4581 _ _ .,. SURVEYING [NGlMEiIUMG PLANNING MANAGEMENT -DRAWN BY il. 5.5.77 CHECKED AY APPROVED BY RENTON) WA8HINGTON- Fl6ORE 4 y . , . . , CITY OF ZL , . . . , _ , , . • .APPLICATF PERMIT 2 . MAY. 12 1977 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY \-ii ---- ------.. 1••, .). • File No . SP- d 6, " 7 Fee4.,/ C. IDa to ' Rec'd .7/.2/11 _ Receipt No . s9/�' _,_ bEP •`' APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : ' • '1. Name Tripp - Harper _ _ _Phone 235-1 550 Address 324 S.\/. 16th Renton, Wa. . 12. Property locat.ionNear Southeast corner ofLongacres . 3 . Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) __ __ (See attached) - -- ______ • ' 4 . Number of acres or sq. ft. 26.59 Acres : Present zoningl.._.or...MP. __ 5. What do you propose to develop on this property? Grade site only ....._......___ for future Light I b.u s t r i_o r P1 a n i f.ar t u r-i.ng-P-a-F-k 6. The following information shall be submitted with this application: Scale A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , • existing structures , easements , and other 1" 10 ' or 20 ' factors limiting development) • B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan . . 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning 1" = 200 ' - 800 ' on adjacent parcels) D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) i E . A special permit required by the Renton Mining, Excavation ' and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307 . 5 in addition to the above . • 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER' S ACTION; • Date approved . Date denied • Date appealed `_ _ Appeal action M___ --- - • Remarks -- _ — P r '1il, i i i .t:kr.. 1 . AFFIDAVIT J A.pi gr.( r. 1t '`9 &t, /Z I , ,1 A,,,,, �,� /� 000 , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner_ . the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me • this // day of ilvi ,,„—, , 19 77, Notary Public in and f the State dr of Washington, residing at (2f9 40111ir (Nam of Nota y Public) (S' -ature of Owner . , • . ______. „0--/-0--1-vt_,A---7.. - a , ,,F;" ‘2, „,/32, ,2,5785-z) • Address) (Address) 9,c5v/2j-- , , __I-752e4s',e5=2 Ze%'// (City) (State) . (Telephone) , . • 1 (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) 1 CERTIFICATION . This is to certify that the forego '. - ' cation has. been inspected by me and has been found to be thorouge n co 4r e in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulasr, \ ton Planning Department governing the filing of such a - AJica .� D O MAY 12 1977 Date Received -0 19 By: L\ NG D E P PR( a +1, a ;_...,"; ., n„„i- ►I:.' =`vim' LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Government Lot 9 and the Henry Meader Donation Claim No. 46, all in Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Section 25; thence South 0°49' 10" West, along the East line of said Section 25 a distance of 180.01 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to and 180 feet southerly measured at right angles to, the north line of said Section 25; thence North 87°12'59" West, parallel with said North line, 20.01 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to and 20.00 feet Westerly, measured at right angles to the East line of said Section 25, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North 87°12'59" West, parallel and 180.00 feet Southerly of the North line of said section, a distance of 1026.07 feet; thence South 1°01119" West 1095.58 feet; thence South 88°24'48" East 1029.43 feet to a point on a line 20 feet Westerly, measured at right angles to the East line of said Section 25; thence North 0°49' 10" East parallel to said east line 1074. 19 feet to the True Point of Beginning. OsF RF/y RECHIED �o MAY 12 1977 ' I ' CITY OF RENTON, 14ASHINGTON • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ' ' �,• �j+�=; '... :. ,, ..,'.''..'.','',,I,''.'.'.„-:..:,:.':..,';.....,„_.• . E 'FI% .. . ,MAY 12 1977 :;'s' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ` � Application No. S/'— o -516- 7 2 Environmental Checklist No. ,C1F --7-63� " I'l NC' DEPP1/4t `''PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: ' ® Declaration of Significance • ®Declaration, of Significance Declaration of. Non-Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance' • .. • ;-;•• COMMENTS: :'.Introduction . .The State .Environmental _Policy Act of 197,1, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires . . all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their.: . ..: . `,-•; own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that .an EIS be ' .: prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. • :. :. ..: . The purpose of this checklist 'is to help the agencies involved determine whether •or not •a '..' ": proposal is such a major action. . ; Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the 'information "fir ' •-;'. "•;presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where '... `' you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your:;':.,,;{, ;;' ` `` explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele . vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will •help all _. ▪ agencies involved with your. proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. , : ';'.:,aThe following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the• license for• which . you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is .sought. , Your •answers ;;.!, should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal 'when it is completed, • even though completion may not occur until sometime 'in the- future. This will allow all ._ "'.`•;;''- -: ::-.'- of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- •', ',!'': - out duplicating paperwork in the future. ' NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State ' ,'-'.;'`r•, ., •: of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to '' . ':�; '':': your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and :continue on to ,the ', ;;;;` : . next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM:.. : . ;: I . BACKGROUND , • , , . • 1. -Name of Proponent Tripp - Harper et al . li •2. Address and phone number of Proponent: - 324 S. W. 16th ;` Renton, Wa. 98055 • ;','" • Phone: (206.) 235-1550 • 3. Date Checklist submitted '. • 12 May 77' . 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton 5. Name of proposal , if ,applicable . 5. N/A • 6. - Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its ,.,;,; - ' size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate ' understanding of its scope and: nature) : , • See Attachment A. ' • • , .. -2-• 7. • Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including.',' ' any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ mental setting of the proposal ) : See Attachment .A. -i,'.-' .. • 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : Auq.. 77 • ' 9. List of all permits , licenses 'or. government approvals required for the proposal!: ._, .. ,,' : :`J..„, (federal , state and local --including rezones) : , Grading Permit • ' City of Renton Special Permit • , ' • Department of Ecology Flood Control Zone Permit 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity ' related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: - The proposal is to grade the property to allow for some future use. `: ; ,.; . • • 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain . , — No ,'i,;,:ir ':- 12.• Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- ,.; . ',` ' . . . posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, .describe the nature of such application form: , • • ' City of Renton Application for Special Permit. Department of Ecology Flood Control Zone Application• jP �`,;:.I I . - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS • ...... (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) • Unstable earth conditions or in changes ingeologic . substructures? X . YES MAYBE NO • (b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil ? X ' • . YES MAYBE NO ; ;• • ' (c). . Change in topography or ground surface relief X • features? YES MAYBE N-b--- (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any • . ° ;-.:::,. unique geologic or physical .features? M X • .. .. . • YMAYBE NO •,..T.- (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , '.',;;' either on or off the site? - X 3' - _ -_,YET, MAYBE NO . . ' (f) Changes in deposition 'or' erosion of beach sands , or : :, changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which . may modify the channel of a river or stream or the "- ` bed of the ocean or any- bay, inlet or lake? r YES MAYBE Explanation: See Attachment A • . • ,' r • • '..4 . _3_ ,i: ''.�y (2) Air. ' Will the proposal result in. t,. (a). Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air,: • ' quality? ' '''s;' ;�,;'�•:.; , : ., , , YES MA BE NO.. :t; .;;r f •(b), •The creation of objectionable odors? X i; ' :';.: YES MAYBE NTT :. �,i - (c) Alteration of air movement,' moisture or temperature, , ;4i, - or any change in climate,' either. locally or r ' "T.r�`; • . regionally? - .<;° ` `'4, _ YES .MAYBE NO :; :?; .Explanation. - • ,.,'•:; (3) Wate.r. Will the proposal result in: • `." .'•::; .•,•. (a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of : ;r:•'; water movements, in either 'Marine or fresh waters? ' ' i`' '''!''• . YES MAYBE NO •:if? : . (b) ' Changes in' absorption rates , drainage patterns , or' ' '. `:':4 the rate and amount of surface water runoff? . X "-:". ..,'• • 1 ; YES M �1 NO q ' (c) . Alterations to• the course or flow of flood waters?' y YES MAYBE NO ' (d) Change in the amount of surface water, in any water - body? X ':•4'i•' , • YES : MAYBE NO •• . r : : ,.,, a;;' (e) • Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration -4 ' ` :;`,,':` surface water quality, including but not limited to `'''`• •f' ;-."/ : ,.temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ' X :•'1:•;•` i ;' YES MAYBE risr " (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of^If; ,,�. ground waters? {'�t' • YES MAYBE NO .:,: ' =` - (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either . "' through direct additions or withdrawals , or through; -i ;,+ - 'r• , ...interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _X__, -_ -a' :14 • YES . MAYBE NO , :" 'l4:':,' (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either 'through •. •`;y=•• direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, . ), phosphates , detergents ,' waterborne virus or -bacteria , " ' ti;;:: '" - or other substances into the ground waters? X ,, " , , . • YES MAYBE NNO' a;,: . •;' j'i' i Reductionwater otherwise available "' ''?r�1,-' ' .;;.;:�,:: ( ) in the amount .of i _ •��� :'';;: for public water supplies?: , • X !•x;'a'- ' YES MAYBE NO : Explanation. w1a: iit' 14...1.yf,• (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in. _ • ?;:;=:..r:: •• ,(a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any ' ' • -`'. ";;' s ecies of flora includin trees shrubs rass , cro s :. .',.`I'` '.; . microf1ora and aquatic',pl ants)? • ' • . . X y r. .' � - : ; YES MAYBE .�S . .i2-4• •.:• - '(b) ,:.Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare :or ", >', '1':r�•,, ' .;. endangered species of.. flora? , , X �: y•;.' ' • 'YES{ M YBE. NO .:, ,; '' �; (c) . ' Introduction of new species of flora into an area , or. . ' '' -;,;;. .:.<;;:.J;, ~' in a barrier to the normal -replenishment of:: existing _ #.,ire.;,. ' pis,`_ ' species? ' I X -V'.';•;r. ,. ;r. ;s: „- ; • _ • ,. `YES MAYBE, NO •:'�-', :P;SL ;•,r •° \• ' .;' ,(d)'• Reduction .in' acreage of any 'agricultural 'crop? '•''ti : r V— M YBE N0,' ,'p-t`. t.;., i,,,,-; '':“:; _ ;) Explanation. >' • • -4- r (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity' of species , ,or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including ;, .•' .-:.,:,.' . • ', reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , _,,. )?, X ;• ', insects or microfauna . },;' S MAYBE :NS. (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or � '` , - endangered species of fauna? • . -' X .1. • , , . • YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , • or result in a barrier to the migration or movement ,of fauna? X ' - YES , MAYBE NO ' (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? yt t , - , . YES MAYBE.• NO + ' Explanation. .'? . . • (6) , Noise. ' Will, the proposal increase existing noise levels? • X ---� 4 _ Explanation: 1 (7)• Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or • ° :;'` glare? _ X '{'• ' . • YES MAYBE NO . Explanation :.lF, _ , (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the : • present or planned land use of an area? , X E MAYBE NO ;;• Explanation: • (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in : ` (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? • ' X . YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 1 YES MAYBE NO , • Explanation. =r, ,.. ( 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve 'a risk of an "<<: ,.''.' :•`:;:,- . , explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including , "':,';:' ,, • ' but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) ' .. in, the event of an accident or upset conditions? - X 1TES ' MAYBE NO ;.'.;. • Explanation. N/A • '`'" ;' • `,:, ,: . (11) ' Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- . ' bution, density, or growth rate' of the human population "....•,,. of an area? X YES MAYBE ,NS: ;; : Explanation. N/A _ ` :' '1I • • -5- • (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect 'existing housing, or • create a demand for additional housing? _X_ • YES MAYBE NO• ' Explanation: N/A • • (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : • (a) Generation of additional, vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand ' • for new parking? YES MAYBE NO ' * (c) . Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YET— MAYBE NO • • • (d) Alterations tb present patterns of .circulation or • movement of people and/or goods? X_ • ' • YES MAYBE NO • • (e) Alterations to waterborne , rail or air traffic? ' X ' • YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? • YES MAYBE NO ' Explanation: • • • • ( 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : • • • • '(a) Fire protection? X.— YES MAYBE NO . (b) Police protection?' X • YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? • YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE• t' O • (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO • ' Explanation: • • 15 Energy. Will the proposal result in : Re ( ) P P (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? • YES . MA B NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require • the development of new sources. of energy? YES MAYBE NO Explanation : • (16) Utilities . Will the proposal result i'n a need ' for new ' systems , or alterations to the following utilities : • ' (a) Power or natural gas? ' YES MAYBE NO „ . (b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO . • (c) Water? X • • • YES MAYBE NO -6- • - - (d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES FI-A—YBE NO— - ,.(e) . Storm water drainage? X . YES MAYBE NO (f) S-olid waste and disposal,? _x_• YES MAYBE NO ' Explanation : , ( 17) .Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding . . mental health)? X • YES MAYBE NO Explanation: N/A ( 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal, result in the obstruction of . any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the . '•4; proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive . site open to public view? X • YES MAYBE NO • • Explanation: } • • . ( 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the ,, 1,;, quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: ' • . • 1 ' (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an , . alteration of a ,significant archeological or historical . site, structure , object or building? X YES MAYBE NO . • Explanation: - __ !^____ • .'•III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state' that to the best of my knowledge the above information is. true and complete. It is understood' that the lead agency may withdraw ,any decla- ' ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.' , . Proponent: ts("sclr4N,CP..c..).„.....j (signed) . • Todd W. Hummel• • (name printed) •• . . Group Four, Inc. • Agent for Proponent City of Renton , • Planning Department ' 5-76 Tripp-Harper 77r110. ATTACHMENT A I . BACKGROUND Nature of Proposal I , The proposal is to regrade compacted fill from the South half of the site to the North half of the site, creating a level fill over the entire area. The northern portion exists as a open pasture with some standing water and wet spongy ground. The southern portion is covered by 8 feet of compacted fill . Regrading of the site will result in a uniform fill over the entire area for future Light Industrial or Manufacturing Park use. Location The site is 2. 59 acres, of ground located in the Green River Valley, in the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 25, Township 23, Range 4 E. , W.M. near the Southeast corner of the Longacres Race Track, Renton, Wa. 11 . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1 . Earth The 1973, King County Soil Survey indicates two types of soil on the site. These are Woodenville silt loam (Wo) and Puyallup fine sandy loam (Py) . Woodenville soils are formed under grass and sedges, are poorly drained and have seasonal high water table. The permeability is low and the chance for stream overflow is great. Puyallup soils are well drained soils formed in alluvium. They form natural levees in valley bottoms where they are found. The permeability is moderate to rapid, although, runoff is slow due to slight slope. The proposal is to grade the site creating level fill over the entire area. The site is essentially flat except the 8 foot raise created by the fill . The northern portion exists as an open pasture with some wet and spongy ground. Filling the entire area will stabilize the earth conditions creating a desirable site for future .development. There will be little change, in the relief features as the ground will remain flat but raised approximately 4 feet over its entirety. Filling should create no increase in erosion, siltation or deposition on the site. 2. Air Emissions to the ambient air or objectionable odors created by the machinery will be temporary, lasting only as long as the grading activities. Due to the open and out of the way nature of the site, the exhaust emissions created. by machinery are not anticipated to generate objections or complaints. 3. Water The site lies in the floodplain of the Green River. Springbrook Creek formerly ran through the site but was displaced to the open ditch that runs along the eastern boundary by previous filling on that ground. There is still standing water in the old creekbed - that has not been filled and two small ponds -- with rushes and wet ground. The proposed P-1 Channel which may eventually run along the western boundary will eliminate flood hazard in this area. Filling will eliminate standing water on the site and displace it to the drainage ditch along the eastern boundary. Storm water runoff will be drained into this open ditch. 4. Flora Filling of the northern portion will eliminate natural fauna that exists there. Pasture grasses predominate over most of the site although pond grass, cattails and rushes occur in areas with sufficient moisture. There are several small willow trees scattered over the site. Filling will eliminate reveg- etation of natural species although there are some hearty pioneer species flourishing on the present fill . No known unique, rare or endangered species of flora exist on the site nor will the acreage of any agricultural crop be reduced. 5. Fauna Reduction of habitat will reduce natural species such as mice, frogs, garter snakes, moles, lizards, sparrows, etc. by 90 percent. Species such as ducks, hawks, herons, bitterns, blackbirds, swallows, robins, etc. , that visit the site regularly will be displaced and eventually eliminated through competative exclusion. To our knowledge, no known unique, rare, or endangered species will be jeopardized by development. 6. Noise Noise levels will be intermittently high throughout the grading activities, but will be limited to waking hours. 7. Light and Glare There will be no increase in the amount of light and glare on the site. 8. Land Use The site is presently unused but has been developed to the extent that half the site has been filled. To the East is a Tank Farm and to the Northwest is the Longacres Race Track. The Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Manufacturing Park. Grading to spread fill over the entire area will create a site suitable for manufacturing or light industrial useage. 9. Natural Resources Grading of the site will not increase the use of any natural resources nor will it cause the depletion of any non-renewable resources.. 13. Transportation/Circulation Grading will not create any significant increase in traffic. Access and adequate parking is available along the East side of Longacres Race Track. 14. Public Services Grading will not generate the need for additional public services on the site. 15. Energy IIIL No excessive demands will be made. on energy sources, nor will grading require any new sources of energy. • - • I I 16. Utilities Grading of the site will create no need for new or expanded utility service. Portable sanitation facilities will be provided on site during the grading activities. 18. Aesthetics The proposal will not obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the public. Filling of the northern portion will eliminate the grassy field that exists there presently. 19. Recreation The proposal will have no effect on the quality or quantity of recreational activities in the area. 20. Archeological/Historical There is no known significant archeological or historical sites or objects, although, there is little evidence of this. I . I . • -ii'nj j'v1 •• •i h a' `y- , ;4 vF t'' et P e h;a`I� .l. 14' ti:,'•u F, iiik • t 9* `S+;r. V 4.�J ��dV V /SIT' 97 7 a • I 44 th'A` ®nii- 7 r L+' ii f, Y �r R tob: 38 • • ,', 'x:: iY n 97T, . t;1'<a'' c' Ss ',1: 9:}hail,---i'i JI', gip' .a""! ,Id.' , rys . . t� + a ,1- 1,i • - ii / vYi.i nIY•/:. '; ` • .,.5, .YY a e 'et • lint • r :1:":`-' .�,r iiu: "t -•P w,:, ti,, r,Re�' , :f::. .f n ry„. ,tOf1' ;� ,. ' .e r.....oc.o..¢.i.� ar s: 4} , , 5 i. t: :i; .14 'z „k' ry� i •1,. If' ,1 r Re _ ,k t i)A1l �''{'o.�tti�itia t�r drainage,.is • ��' � ria e" for 'tr is -��' - ,tr.�•�I. 4; 8 j(�j/� 1ia.ri,:.eT'':.' ,'C!-{ -i'-: f: _ , 41 r�!r.��r'1, .{yam. Y'`�: �{�; .y, "Litt":-'';; :k< 4 I ,. gar' - .'Y•• ,�i' :Snn;,;5:, ,?. i�, IP?:+4,;!?.':n�3, , e- - t Om n 'i`i;i.�t. .:�,'�. a.t 1. k{';.,,,:,; .L. " 4� 14 a't"I'� ^Ya. i� : t �.at'r. :.a �.T tie ter'i. ,,,,, , ,:, 1: .e na-.:e; aan'- for.'''7r` 's;.', '�:, ,�y:: I ",. ;:. ,.. ,,.. 9 ,�P 1. .',i��t?`.>��`^^ .: �.,eft': : t= ''f'i'e��t 'i :,G r' ;;a n'•`R ver:' L e'` .a't`.�the:sou. fi�' ,; . YL t east �coriier'.:bf!;i�.•,a;::� �: ;;��,' ,,'. ' f - ..7' •.I �n:•.: �,t:': F Y �..' fin. � �,:;,:i• - WaS i„ h. n, Lori' -hl ' .,. ..t. .ff:< ' a?'•':�:', , �,w.i..Y1 ''be.�li' e� 'oTa: abn� :A• z. 9 ��`'p rc t and':::reiiha`r ,,,,.a• �:,.,;, ,.;,t,. t ;,;I '1 ,t.Y :y: �5 T ((�fir -irk `'tr wo c t i`f. Q �,'�'+b �i': Inov`i n` f .,. �: 4 eet .ofi 'r' �J �'�' ':2•' •�_. ':f.'eA„�+ ,.y, :11. 4fir.T ,al— '�+.L,_,.1.�;''Y,^', J;v" •FI ii ,.t ''st' a'3R =r, � t on• the nor-t�,,_,-,,Li.. a`i`f '�::'! .Y_ .,�,. 9°:. ;T�iie`!'eft�i'st:I' ,ri.�i. , •'�.. .e�t:'r.�ah`e�='f��i'starl' ':f' ',M.� 'I` �'��.r�,. f, .(,.. � ,, 'Ill.l';.,e l eva t i'ori;:'�i: ' Py}^q 5�;:�'e �.'��' tt}t r'. ".,',,,: , - I -:`-:a�'•'�1,1� :.4 ' ,1 ..i' � ,1., ��.!n" Vt�.,, .:It �.�4},�,�`�•�•U. ':af�„�Qpo �,'.{ �{,' y ... i:te`'sub 'rac to kE' °a,,.R•' .')..p,,,:a~<� ,•,'a"..{ 9 ¢.,_ 'ei: va.fa;crr' .'is'.`i'4.:5';'feet. ;:;. "�i .'k« r.�- .t„ ',ice.'.•;;,✓,,y, i,,,:'i . ''t, T i e' 'i e gym.' ;�9 c ila}i'.n�a,•corderi�` -cdn'f i aura:`, s: ,Y` ,.�:. , t�rc:iri fi;�l-+',t t ��.��1:;:'.o �n��d is c l • -`. around'' he { i:r .,,,,' :f,,: - ;:t ,.:�er,i,ij;i;'ter�� of; tle''f.i1.1. Storm'wa e- . �+ "I r, t r�;rttn�iff�:,.. .`'lJ+l:�-�� a.,'.d i;re -:��:a�`�i,: r'>, , �,�r.:9r'' �;f�r,., •+; '�.,�;w- 7., Y';R 'the os i.tr.v `r.'p .�. ` ade'�`o'f�..ahe- co.rdero �'I' ,Y � J`;. W?9. y surface. c,�t^�f=r ui-a`�:id�:<,,.. �lq� t•:� �f��`i: i� - -t:,'; I',. 9, ..,,,, �, P, c p" Via.°," • . �.p through', the ;''f„�i.11 'sulr,f c��-'�"u`'o`�'f �� /,• �,}' >,:,,r.. ;. � � n ./P w'�:al.l�:`,be.,t+b;l�,l:'e'� ted' Yt�:n''�.� �'.c.., the;` `'erimi': er`:"d'itc'h `a :t ,,;0:',,i Z'' -9'; 4:., �P l tid d i.reefed�"to sett<�l rng���ta`5 t.i1 ' ' �,< r.�;�C��Bd•.".�'. (le,'-;Sdu'Li7H1S'P � and,northeast:corner Surf ' ` :. ace ;runoff`co.l l ected?i'i``. a'he F "` rechar. etlie,- round water :,o ,.g::' ..' ,,,I 9 table. Sethi in pond o =:co s'-�wi1,1;".a;7s� nIf'8''i;n",:•o�e'�r.f;l,ow'' ,..', dr,a;�,ns`'`.that.;r�e.1ea'se`I's: orm water `"' ., t to the.O0en d i.tch:' OrderIn' ';t'h'e;'"e`' ter,'n`'" bound r of;>,the;.;.s"i to :1:' .. . ' ' "I.,;� I.II. • .;, ,:t' Th nic ,, • ,:f' . ' . .. • S'incer.'elyii GROUP. FOUR-, :.i N t • • '• 6 4 , ry•I.I,�' �t• • - D., 'K. Roupe: ' RECEIVED OF' :RE , . President. CITY OF RENT 0 ;''r'": oN R'ECE�UED' -K HEARING EXAMINER f, Y ; y ;'. 4 DR:mf. ' JUL. 1 21977 '„ ' . y, :..tP,4977 , : s.., •;� � MAY. %r'.d ,, .�,:_, PM • ,. ' : A . •' ,-Y÷'' ,'' ..-*.'"I: ...'...',..S . ,,.".',',:.':; ,;::"....;=;."'','."'' ":", ':.i.',,..-r.T'', • • 'EXHIBIT ,DN) NG DES °41 + • i . F. ., Ri1RVFVTN( �� NnLL'U *WATrm!T ,,. ..,.a., G r iiriy.t ab.c}n'. . V' . 'Ii. I I � NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON IA PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 'AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON JULY 12 , 19 77 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER ITHE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . TRIPP-HARPER; SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL AND GRADE IN H- 1 ZONE ; file No . SP-046-77 ; property located approx . 1/2 ,mile west of East Valley Highway , midway between ' Olympic Pipe Line - Mobil Oil site and Longacres Race ' Track. Legal description on file in Renton Planning Department . • I , ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 12 , 1977 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED July 3 , 1977 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I I , jMICHAEL L . SMITH , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST Subscribed and sworn to :before me, a Notary Public , on .the : 28th day of June 19 77 ! . \\ SIGNED AQX6K±—\\N . l4 , 0 R .. :°-=.. 9 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT (c, 235-2550 -c91•fD SEPlt- I June 20 , 1977 Tripp - Harper 324 S . /. 16th Renton , Washington 98055 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE ; APPLICATION NO. SP-046-77 ; PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE GREEN RIVER VALLEY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LONGACRES RACE TRACK Dear Sirs : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on June 20 , 1977 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for July 12 , 1977 , at 9 : 00 a . m. . Representatives of: the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . • Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen. Planning Director • / d By : is ae L . Smit Associate Planner MLS :wr cc : Group Four, Inc. D . K. Roupe , President INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW REOUEST TO : / PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ✓ BUILDING DIVISION ://ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION X UTILITIES DIVISION FIRE DEPARTMENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT lt' Icitae l �jL64 ± . Contact Person R E: J T- r— �te-J , FE,Vw1171-- "1r' ...4'1 I aw�a at-e Please review the attached information regarding the subject proposal and return it to the Planning Department. by 4 17477 ' with your written recommendation . Your response will be included as part of the staff report to the Hearing Examiner. Thank you , PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date % ` THE CITY OF RENTON Cw .. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 c C � , �' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT co' O � 235-2550 ,P�TED SFP�F- ' • June 27 , 1977 Mr. George Wannamaker King County Division of Hydraulics Room 976 King County Administration Building Seattle , Washington 98104 Dear Mr. Wannamaker: RE : TRIPP-HARPER SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL AND GRADE , FILE NO. SP-046-77 Attached for your review and comment is a copy of an application for special permit to fill and grade a site located just north of the City ' s 20-acre wetland area and west of the existing Olympic Pipeline and Mobil Oil Company facilities . We would appreciate your review and any comment regarding the application as soon as possible . A public hearing date has been set for July 12 , 1977. We also understand that the applicant has applied to your office for a Flood Control Zone Permit. If you need any additional information , please contact this department. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Dir ctor pichael L . Sm. th Associate Planner GYE :wr Enclosures 1