No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA77-063 r- V\ 16\ P5 BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE SpEGIA� PERMIT 5P- 0�3- 77 LIND AVENUE 5 . W. / RAYMoNO AVE . S. W THE ftUSr� N COMPANY alas l �� pF R11, �, icv as y. , 0 THE CITY OF RENTON u of . r Z j Z • .,;,:k MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 bek 0 p MI= ' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 0 L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 41- F0 SEPlt° • August 30, 1977 TO: Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director FROM: Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: Austin Company Special Permit No. SP-063-77 During today's hearing on this application the applicant indicated that access for an unknown volume of trucks depositing landfill on the site would be utilizing Grady Way and Lind Avenue S.W. as access to and from the site. To date, your department has been silent regarding the feasibility of this access and traffic engineering implications other than to state that no, significant impact would occur as a result of the. proposal. In light of the applicant's testimony that 50,000 cubic yards of landfill will be deposited on the site on a continuing• basis until the project is completed and that Grady Way and Lind Avenue S.W. and possibly S.W. 16th Street will be utilized for access, does your department's opinion remain the same? Please respond within ten days in order that I may forward a copy of your review to the applicant and integrate it into my final decision. 0111.111!:411111. I0 �► -ic Beeler RB:mp • I�� 34 Gerard M. Shellan i Page Two • The hearings on the above subjects have been closed but continued for a brief period to allow for your legal opinion on this subject. As soon as your opinion is received I will forward copies to the applicants and complete my decision. As was indicated in our telephone conversation, if the landfill must indeed be set back ten feet from the building setback line, the applicants would have to make application for a variance from this requirement. I would appreciate your response within ten days. "OW- Olit'T r\ u....w.•� .J.....u...ru...r..........�.. ....._ L. Rick Beeler LRB:mp cc: Mike Smith, Planning Department 2- pF U ® o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 p a) CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT (0 235 - 2550 D4TFD SE PSE*O MEMORANDUM August 26 , 1977 TO : L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner FROM: Gordon Y . Ericksen , Planning Director By: Michael L . Smith , Associate Planner RE : THE AUSTIN COMPANY SPECIAL PERMIT NO . SP-063-77 Attached is a copy of restrictive covenants relative to The Austin Company as requested . With reference to your other questions , please see our memorandum of August 25th regarding the Gary Merlino Special. Permit request. wr Attachment j . RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AUG 2 51977 AM PM 7,8,9110,1111211,2131415/6 A • METRO INDUSTP1-_'t7„ DISTRJ-C T • I NCchi>Gr,' :-1 calle " is t. of the real property desribed in i..'_.'.a:.`:.t t': called the .�Ct7 Tract, t; r"' t: ...•.;1 to ::._.; ..... __. ._" l::�i--;. , :o .L _ .c V, C . J.-.ac i_, and d_sire::, to :-•1 :Iect th ? - t to the conditions , covenants , ;est;io-1-ions r..esorvtios i, ,r% c_ 1 1 called covenants) hereinafter set forth, isand (. for the benefit of the Tractand each owner thereof„, . - � : • Co the benefit ?nci pass with the Tract, and ir vei :i: r �= .C. t:J c;.: t.: Qt`_C::t c�:7.C. every i..:, c.Ji.' _�.,; l thereof, and shall apply to and bind the suc ;css , in. ..d owner thereof. � ::iLL,' THEREFORE, G hereby declaresthatTract ��0:'', ^ ';R_sFOPrantQr the is, �,� ''l Ca and Cl ,�,�,l l .�_ h� ' , transferred,. sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the coven;. �.ts, here set forth. �. • CLAUSE DEFINITION r,r�. "Building Site" shall mean any lot, or portion thereof, or two or more contiguous lots or portions thereof, or a part el. of land in the Tract ' upon which a commercial or light industrial building .or buildings- and appurtenant structures may be erected in conformance with the require- ments of these covenants m - . "Improvements" shall mean and include a co=e rc•:..al warehouse, or light industrial building. or buildings, outbuildings a.pnuruenant thereto, park load inc- areass` inG* areas,. fences, masonry wails, :� � loading areas , Ii.c.., �. � 1 hedges,es, lawns, mass plantings and any structures of any type ,or kind l.oca:wed above ground. Building line or lines" shall mean the maximum distance which commercial warehouses, or light industrial buildings and outbuildings o"' any struc- tures of any type or kind located above ground shall be set back from the ' property or street lines„ , . . "Side Building -site line" shall mean the boundary or property line aivi-- ding tiro •adjoining building sites. . • CLAUSE II . • GENERAL PURPOSES OF CONDITIONS The Tact 1 �- is Subjected to the covenants to insure proper use .:nd ap•��•n';I i_. .. development of each building site; to protect the oi•rner's of buiidino sj.tes against improper use of surrounding building sites as will depreciate the • value of their property; to guard against the erection thereon C on of st i:l:? e: built of improper or unsuitable materials; to insure adequate and rest sonab li development of: the' Tract; to encourage the erection of attractive ir,lreve•" Bents thereon with aD rO iiate locations '"her .. s; co ore- s p P•" thereof on �•:J.i_C:1.I:C' E;:�.1:.F• vent haphazard and inharmonious improvemen-a of building s:_ , '<-; ' scot;:::o and maintain proper set-backs streets, an `uaue `'' _ _ between structures; and in general al_ to provide : u•atoly for a h= _'a t" -1- • and quality of improvement in the Tract.. , - . (Continued) /4' . { . c:i,.��tj; TIT • C3.;; 1. ' _,..:'. :i.c .::c : • r A. No noxious or O1::C :i1.,J'J'C t:'"c:ta: i ' y be anything be done thereon which i:." '' en o:..• hcc: �1..il. ann tr` c /., the Tract by -• . `'''� _.._. O , c;l-1C:e: O:- iU:.... . ; - reason of on ,_ightl.t.1ice -1 C,• 7C-: � �)... '�.lC`: .._. .... ,:LL'C'- Qf3S)_o:; Of Cy'ii:".:: • (lust, fumes, smoke or i1C)a.; C' • B. Without otherwise limiting the provisions o,_ 'araq: al)n A of t 1:'_. Ca:,s III, or• any of the other terms and conditions of -i c:se coven nti;, tla buildings or premises, except as otherwise provided in these re:Ti •_ ive ' covenants, may be used for any use permitted under apel_ica.bl . c_' t;i. I zoning regulations, as the same now exist, or i -P as tiZe samehave been ,r hereafter be amended, except the following uses shall not be permit•.=:' ; 1. Auto .wrecking, salvage yards, used material yards, baling of waste or scrap paper, rags, meta ls,s . or junk; 2, Bag cleaning; • 3 . Boiler and tank works; _.- 4 . Central mixing plant for asphalt, moi:ta'r:r plaster or concrete. C. Improvements erected on the Tract shall not exceed th i_;ty•- _ ,.ve (35) i el in height, without the written approval of the Grantor. • D. No, ir;tnrovements as herein defined shall be erected, placed or altered c any building site until the building or. other improvement plans, specifica- tions, and plot plan showing the location of such improvements on the part: cular building site have been submitted to. and approved in writing as to conformity and harmony of external design with existing structures in the development, and as to _Location of the improvements on the building site a: as to location- of the improvements With respect to topography, grade and finished ground elevation, by Grantor, unless and until such right• has beer • expressly assigned, and then such right will pass to such assignee. The Grantor, -its successors or assigns, shall not be liable in damages to any one so submitting plans for approval or to any owner or owners of lane covered by this instrument by reason of mistake in judgment, negligence o': non-feasance of itself, its agents or employees, arising out of or in con- nection with the approval. • or disapproval, or failure to approve any sub:1 plans, Any one SO submitting plans 'to the Grantor for approval, by the • submitting of such plans, agrees that , he o7; it will not bring any action o suit to recover for any such damages against the Grantor. . In the event - Grantor fails to approve or disapprove such design a.nd location within thirty (30) days after plans and specifications have been submitted to this covenant will be deemed to have_ been fully compliedwith, IT the •t J oli- structi on -ot alteration of improvements or extension of trackage is bec;1122 in violation of the terms and conditions ons of this Section D or without th.a written approval required in other ctio is hereof = erection, establishment or alteration of such is _roveme. is r of ii �. • _ackc ge has been commenced prior to the completion thereof, havebeen CJ'i�.._ nt will he deemed to fully complied with.. • 1 • - 'opon—•n_ _.l 0-,: �('(: ..e . • . (.J . . separately c -:ed 11�;'):,:C .•. '.1 _ . .. �.t . .. .. ., ty lino clil:jo .`; a (iC:C:.._:i'. i.I i' (. ty lino sl ..L.l not cl'J' C . ' 'L7:'(% the railroad company, . �:;lt 1::, ,.c. )�-.of any .building site, J10 '_ .11c: 1.•.J=i o:' bui.1d•i 1'"' . . . . �� right-of-way Or .F�1 '- c J I'� � I.�. V i.:G•.�, ui:' C.' -- d the railr0 exeoi F;:1 1::::�.c.'i''il C'Gu`�:'ii [; d:1 railroad CGiui�'<4:'1�'s - ' • • No building or structures shall '? closersixty 1^' /'\ L1 l b, 'Lhan s { South 153rd Y, ,t or thirty = _._ U) foot tO thi' 4i Y1 ' L. .`r oth::;;_ v:. C.. ..lr1{.il',n the Tract. �' ' - �� . Improvements on any building ldi.n(; i.i.('^::ha�.l ne'•-- . than US'� of the site. The. J_ OCCL more 1h facing material o�: the !)i:1.1.C�' r).tj in the r'ra t shall be ' concrete block, brick, steel, or other material Grantor. other i:._.%C r:1.e: 1. i) i.CiVC '., by the r. No building or structures above ground ;-L , • lines, area aJc extend beyond the "'L111G. '"; • , and the area between the building lines a_;;[;. the • • •.-J- v linc,s is to be uhed either for open landsca,:cd and _ .� o : o: faced pa kind areas. If i111dS6-ap :c' it C) l 1 J_ ac ,f I:�'-`'`^w th ., .t shall cone• attractively with laL•ril trc�e.^a Sill:L1��' '' - ••• _ l _ ' /7 , .J, e:lrc• , c^.CCG%Ck.LII�� l.d p3..�!..1.? J_.1.:_Ut.. Cl4'�:�::OV''ed In �'ri:.V.!.Z(.' )J,1 T.G OJ_J. Sl.rl.e:•c t.-::: Jt�.:'Sl 4s:�� 1� r , surfacingmust be approved -i�' c.i:1C1i1C, c.:.J_.:'i:rc:',;.�;i::;� Z...G j in writing by , Grantor.'a:hl.. Any l�:�iC:.�.:C.'c:i���.d [•_d pnr;:i.nc. areas shall be maintained in good condition. -" G. The location. of loading facilities v1e.._:. shipping and receiving i ocksare required shall be subject to the approval of the Grantor. N. Power.used in any' establishment in the Tract shall be confined to elec- , trical or substantially equivalent type of power using only oil, gasoline: gas or liquid petroleum products or similar Cobu ti nlo• m:.tcr Lals in its production, or other products which do not p1iocmc:e excessive smoke, odors . • or fumes. . • .1. For each light manufacturing, jobbing, warehousing, wholesaling or other use permitted in the area subject to .these covenants, there :,'hall b e provided off street automobile parkingsuchto facilities, facilities �,, be app oved •in writing by • Grantor but to bO based generallythe eminimumPate at `ll� �. ..�. of one parking space for each three employees to be employed on the pr al C?i (i:?Ci5 J. The storage of bulk co::modities shall be confined to locations and scrceni.l., thereofas approved in writing by the C;_tlntor. X. Railroad right-of-wayGrantorany easements may be granted ed by on ty in the Tract so long as it .is the owner in fee simple thereof. L. , No bit board- nY- - 7 7.r.,~' ' li • n i— -. Ir si c other than these i.cic::lti.f,,•inc; the name, business and prodiucts of the person or firm occupying the i)'=o:lises shall be permitted., except that a sign not to e ten foot bv twenty (20) feet in size offering the premises 1:U:'7 sale or lease permitted. . ' ii. No fence, masonry' wall, hedge or mass n{ i?: shail be permitted to extend beyond the building lines establish c-L he:_c::,i: except r L:':CJa ct:��.�Ci v cl.t ?..J Writing by the Grantor. - . • . 1 . -)... ,- • • . . . . - , . . , . . . . Auditor ' s 2ile No, 67.92;711 Paco -4- . . . • . . N. Whenever the wrin apprcval of the Crantor is :.:C.:(111.-LKC. i'‘.-'. connecti.on with any improvements to be installed, erectc.d, or altered, or is otherwisc, . ' required by the provisions of the covenants, sa:-:.e shall be governed bv the conditions set forth in Section D, Clause II:r„ hereof,, . . 1 . : ; 1 , 1 O. Each of the conditions, covenants, restrictions and reservations sot forth above shall coLtinue and be binding upon the Grantor and upon its successors and assigns and upon each of them and all parties and all oer L sons claiming under them for a period of twenty-five (25) ve::.rs from date 1 - . hereof. . .. - .. . Reasonable deviations from these covenants may be permitted upon the prio written approval of the Grantor. 1 . . • . . . P. These covenants shall run with the land and bind the owner of each no: tion .of the Tract, its successors and assigns, and all parties agree to • conform to and observe them, but no covenant shall be personally binding c any corporation, person or persons, except in respect to breaches committc 1 during its, his or their ownership, and Grantor or the owner or owners of .• J 1 - any of the above land shall have the right to sue for and obtain an in.jun( tion prohibitive or mandatory to prevnt the breach of or to c:nfcrce the observance of these covenants, in addition to the ordinary leccal action fc dnfl,-----,- and the failure of Grantor' and the owner of any other lot or lot.: c.. ,—,...,,, , CA , or building sites hereby restricted to enforce any of the covenants at t1-1 time of its violation, shall in no event be coerce to be .a waiver of the right to do so as to any subsequent violation. . • . . . . Q. Invalidation of any one of these covenants or any part thereof by judgments or court order shall in no wise effect any of the ,other provi- ! I - sions which shall remain in full force and effect. ,- 1 r ' . 1 . . 1 . . . ; 1 . • : • , . . . . . . . • . . . . . ! I, ' . ' ' • . . . . , . . , . . . • . , . ' . * • - • . . •. • ' . . . . . . . . - ' : . • . • • . • ° . . . . ' . . . . . • - • . . . . , . . .. , • , . . . . . . • . - . . . . . . . . . . • • . . • • . • ' . . • . . . . • • • • . ; . . . . • ; 1 . - - - - - .• • • ' . . . , . • . . • • . . , • • - - .. . . . • . • .. . • • • . • . • . • , , • • . • ' . ' . . . . • . ; • . . • • • - • • . . • . . . • • . . . . . . • • . • - . • , • • . . • • • . , •udite i'!-�'e -D . o (,i i__. i'.,X.1;L:._,.:_ I. . Lots 11 to 48 inclusive in Block 19 snd all of Blocks 20, 23, 24, , , 3c), 33 and 34 (now vaceted) of C.D. rl1111:-,an ' ; Earl -iigton Garde_,:. Addition to the City of ,Seattle e Division.i _.Ci: No . 1, as per plat .:'c C;o:_'d.,. .,,,,:,,,H inVolume 17 of Pits, on page 74, records of i.i.nJ __.. County, v_- that 4g portion of Lots 12 to 29, inclusive in said Block 15, conveyed to the State of Washington by Deeds recorded under Auditor' s File .:c . 391 o ',,; No. 45� 3, TOGETHER WITH. t - 0-,-1T ay:. andt�� t�� ' 1 1L ',;_L.111 vacated c Ci streets adjoining; ALSO, _,..'..�� I'•�'t:,' I the north 15 feet of the following •described property: -' € I All of the vacated Blocks 23 and 24 of said C .D. Hillman' s :.'3.:arlington '` : Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division i':o. ! TCG:_:.;x....._,_i WITH,4 Sean e Dl v , •;ip: - west n -� of vacated sJ__�_.et • -� r Blockr l ^'/, - %;�,.F the c J one-half TaCa�Cd �.�:. c� aa�o n___z�; 'said LCi r �; 0,. the east, g:, the. east one-half of vacated s erect adjoining said Block 24 on the west, ,,1 . . and all. of the vacated street lying between said Blocks 23 and 2�;; . : , Also, EXCEPT . all that part of the following in described- tract " " ' T_n : r,ri of line drawn with o _ feet es t eriz __ ,, easterly a 1. „c d_. a'. 1 parallel Z'�i�Il 2 Cic 71= 50 _ec tJ distant i'; k..:,•;a,E,,, .. when; measured at Tr4�C.,•it angles from0. t f L Line Surveyey of Primary State htic N CV cs,iyo 1, SSi1 No. 2-M to Jct. .PSi-1 No.. 2 in Rec on, . sa. a tract ,45, I; 'X being described as follows : - R Lots . 11 to 4o, Inclusive in (vacated) Block 19 of said ,C.D. Hillman' s 4.-g ' ._;arlir,�;to i Gardens. r^.dc':it1.on to the City of Seattle .Division No, 1 • . •>t,tl j .6A:C. �'i tnat portion of said Lots 12 to 29 inclusive,' conveyed .to State (gym,v 1 _ - - ' l,j•_ ir.�• i g t _ f+ Auditor' s �:.� O� ,.u,�.�1.�GlJOi"1 �.O.C'- r'Oud by deeds recorded under File Nos . ,_"1 • 391b5CC and 4551.803, records of King County, situatein the C. �y of J_ l J_ F� .!_ J r. j L ;iN . Reritofi, County o.� .King, StJaUe o.� ti`�ashington. . xt { • P • • I . CITY OF RENTON 0 NtO APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT (A. ' 441 FOR FFICE USE ONLY ,9 PQ- �� 7 41 tiQ /: e0P77 Date Rec ' d. ,E 2 NG ;Application Fee $ .4/576 0 Receipt No . /7- jEnvironmental Review Fee $ 27.zD 'APPLICANT TOT COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : l. Name /i/e A'.'nily eon BANS Phone 206 -22 6 -8800 Address 80o S ►y I674 STEEP / ,PE,VrO/v , \VAs,dw6rem, 9805 S 2 . Property location 8E J�s L/ 1 Q �v��v v� �'Jo �AY Bourg Sipe. OF StII /6 rW S3-2E67: 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) T E /Voe7H 455.88 OF VAe.4 re D $moo car 241 C.D. WalablA,vS 9 EArecivc ro,v *642.4 DE,u5 AvA/rjo" TO T/hE eir9 JF .SEAP7G4, 0/015/04, 'tio I J EYGEP7 TKE Po er/O'V 0E4eE Dr Ly/A) et:.Y Oc A LmuE Lc et To yE-- Ce.ore2 L/A/e OF 87 Ave So.r4 1../ND Ad6 . ALSO THE ,loarfl 444.4 OF VAGATErO &o cI 31 Pi.Ar &cces*" TEE Pony/oN L,y/,u c lesrrtec y Piz A Lira 30 ' C A sr Ama Pa,eeALc et To 77;6 CE.vm-2 L/,vE gc 7N Aus ream (/tAYHo,vO Aye ). Ac.s-o T 4r PQr/aN me V4eAr&) A." Ave,uue Soaro 1 49./,4ceAdo AA..o A4v rria4 OPOA, me AgovE pesc/t/$E7o us Po rio or Se,o l c.oc1Cf. 4 . Number of acres or square feet lO • 5 A c tccS Present Zoning44vie /Wag. 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? 1702EPAR.449/04J , Ass u rv2.E ve-i_o ilE-A)7: 6 . The following information' shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan ;(include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B . Parking, landscaping , and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) ' 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307 . 5 in addition to the above. 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER' S ACTION: Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks I � Planning Dept. AFFIDAVIT an officer of METRO INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT{. who is I►� C_ R. Wing , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 28thday of July ► 19 77 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Seattle - (Name of Notar Public) (Signature` of 0 er' Donna J. Trulson C. R, Wing METRO INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT 800 Southwest 16th Street, Renton, WA 800 Southwest 16th Street (Address) (Business Address) (Address) Renton, Washington (City) (State) 226-8800 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me Hand has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to ;conform to the rules d r" gu ` ions of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing <of s_uch Qp ication . ,Date Received 4(1 , By : uep � OV • � 111111 c� ss�oo �N1NG ` Renton Planning Dept . ��!_� 2-7 3 -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : ' Peopee ry to CA 7 - SETiaEe4v 1.,/mo lave ,4 et, fAYMoNvO Av6iVelE---QN 7;4 So i ri zoe ®F ST2 EC-G 45. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : -- 1 JAaOARY 1978 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : CleA OP)4 if 6L4- Ped&I/rf,eo M _ g/frit QF gE-Alfall 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain: No - ---- -- 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: ,4 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed , but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: / II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) ( 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in : (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions , displacements, compaction or over- �I covering_ of the soil? YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? YES MAYBE NO (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? �� �G YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Cc) l.O^P4C..7"'lQv1/41 6JE-7CCov l E(� 1� 540I t_ P c s 4 tiv Ti-Po Ca Z A_P parts. TF) Atu tktG. 1rc' o, coo cy OF CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON e ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ,,: kJ 1 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ��%N , Application No. [A u_ _ � Environmental Checklist No. £ Ct' - aL = /7 PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date : 0 Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance O Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS : — _.-- -- - --- — • Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major.actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. • Please answer the following questions as completely •as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided,, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM - I . BACKGROUND A /� 1 . Name of Proponent _._TNE -__ AUsr/NCOMP NY _ -- 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 800 51V /bra s-,Q€�rrQ ,_C1/Askisc�ON 98055___ P#ionic 206- 226 -88QQ 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist AEAIfDA/ PLAAIAI 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6 RA0 m4 FT; resc l 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : L. /o • 3 Ac& S'irE /v Tit frierito 4. Durr*iAL R-c, F sv'/Ai Are ric..4_ SD 000 r ,,a -4- • (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? �C YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement X of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X ^� � �/ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: t 1 �1.4eQC 1Vh �/�.y1SE M \Y 50 B ILQt(FeI RAa'$trs, Ft et ►`'.L ` lkAIT 'Vit Re DIS Pt AcE-4 13v Ftc.-t&Jc . C1izAOEa (6) Noise. Will the proposal, increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES . MAYBE Explanation: (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in .the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? �( YES MAYBE NO Explanation.: • (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in : (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation : (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including; but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? _ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location,, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Yam— MAYBE NO • Explanation: -3- (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MIT N0 (b) The creation of objectionable odors? �( YES . MAYBE NO (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO ( Explanation: (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or n ' the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? k YES MBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? ?C YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE 0 (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ YES MAYBE 0 ' (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? Nr YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (V) DgiktivA4.e PA MU, A Lire-Ka-0r5y _ New I o P o 4, tZ po tl-4 Airho D 1A -Ltq# • (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? Y!S MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? YES' MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MAYBE NO (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YET— MAYBE NO Explanation: Dt/e C.._,LEAtrAA. T32t.) Sld T cr A L.0n44 \V 1T-14 &J&le co;Jew/,v4 Es-ay./Ala 4.2A 4'r'Ec e1�� FILL • -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? • YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? X YES RAT0 N- (f) Solid waste and disposal? )C /'' YES MAYBE NO /Jtii Explanation: A cocuaer I,Yt( _ 1k A,0408• pa/2 Aorgie 144 02 A[A.44E 7-o Ace_ocJJ ice..aga Ai To A wr 6ear uct PRA1N4\4 E ames-E • (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? ?C MAYBE W Explanation: • (18) Aesthetics.. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation': • • (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 1Q YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? V YES MAYBE N� Explanation: III . SIGNATURE 1, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is uhderstoOd that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: signed • (name printed City of Renton Planning ,Department 5-76 • el" -5- ( 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: ( 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MAYBE NO - (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO • (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YES MAYBE N (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? Y YES HATIE NO Explanation: (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or - result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NO (b) Police protection? )C YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? �! YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? �G YES ' MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance -of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO (f), Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: • (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES M YBE 0 Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : " (a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO (b) Communicat.ions. systems? YES MAYBE NO (c) Water? X— YES MAYBE NO • O F RA' .4 "4N PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT .. WARREN C. GONNASON, P.E. •• DIRECTOR °f MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 - 206 235-2569 O414pf0 sr pi CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR August 26 , 1977 • TO : L. RICK BEELER RECEIVED HearingExaminer CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER FROM: WARREN GONNASON GP AUG 3 01977 kW Public Works Director Phi 71819110,11,I2111213e4,5,6 RE : MERLINO SPECIAL PERMIT NO. SP-062- 77 • In response to your letter of August 24 , 1977, concerning this • subject, the following information is supplied: • • 1) At present City.water is located at the southwest' corner of the property. ' In order for the property to be developed, the developer will be required to install a water main in East Valley Highway to his north property line . This will not be required during this stage of development . . 2) The storm drainage . retention • required is based upon the City's ' proposed drainage ordinance. The ordinance. outlines the criteria to be followed and the developer devises the plan. The P-9 channel as proposed in the SCS drainage project is approximately 70, feet in width as it traverses through the northerly portion of the Merlino properties . This portion of the :properties should not be filled and should be kept clear to provide the necessary right-of-way for the proposed drainage facility. 6) No known comments have been received from the King County Hydraulics Division regarding this or the Tripp-Harper property. 7) Dust control is accomplished by sprinkling water on the unimproiFed surfaces. ,that are being driven on or graded. The city streets should be kept clean of all dirt, mud, and debris . This can be accomplished by using mechanical sweepers to pick up the big pieces and flush truck to wash the street down after the sweeper is finished. This would also be in . response to your Item #4 on your memo regarding the Austin Company Special Permit #SP-063- 77. If you desire any additional information, please advise. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON • PLANNING DEPARTMENT NEARING EXAMINER PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER AUG 3 01977 PM AM PUBLIC HEARING 7,8,9,Iodbi21112s3,41516 AUGUST 30 , A7 gyp^T (� ryy!�(`- i�;' O, / APPLICANT: THE AUSTIN COMPANY ITEM NO. . � - 7 7 FILE NO. : SP-063-77 , SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND. GRADE A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests special permit, pursuant to the City ' s Mining , Excavation , and Grading Ordinance , Chapter 23 , to allow approxi - mately 3 feet of fill , together with grading , on an approximate 10 acre site . B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record: THE AUSTIN COMPANY 2 . Applicant: THE AUSTIN COMPANY 3 . Location : Located on the south side of S . W. 16th Street between Lind Avenue S . W. and Raymond Avenue S . W.. . 4. Legal Description : Detailed legal descriptionon file in the Renton Planning Deparltment, 5 . Size of Property : Approximately 10. 3 acres. 6. Access : Via S . W. 16th Street'''and Lind Avenue S . W. 7 . Existing Zone: H-1 , Heavy Industry , �With restrictive covenants . 8 . Existing Zoning in H-1 , Heavy Industry ; M-P , Manufacturing the Area : Park District ; L71 , Light Industry ; and G, General Classification District. 9. Comprehensive Land Manufacturing Pank. Use Plan : L 10. Notification : The applicant was: notified in writing of the hearing date.. Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . Notice was also mailed to surrounding property owners . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The purpose of the request is to allow filling and grading to an elevation consistent with surrounding properties , which would ini - tially prepare the site for future industrial and commercial development. D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The site and general area was annexed to the City on April 14 , 1959 , by Ordinance No . 1745 . The subject site was rezoned from G to H- 1 , Heavy Industry District, on May 7 , 1962 , by Ordinance No . 1955 . . Certain restrictive covenants were established at the time of the rezone to , run with the land. These covenants deal with permitted uses , setbacks , landscaping areas , and other site development require- ments . The area immediately surrounding the site has been previously filled to an elevation of approximately 23 feet. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF AUGUST 30 , 1977 PAGE TWO RE : THE AUSTIN COMPANY , SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE , SP-063-77 E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The subject site is relatively level . 2 . Soils : Puget Silty Clay Loam ( Pu ) . Permeability is slow, and seasonal high water table is at or near the surface. Runoff is slow to ponded , and erosion hazard is slight. ' The soil is generally used for row crops and pasture . 3. Vegetation : The site consists primarily of scrub grasses and abandoned pasture area with various 'deciduous trees scattered around the perimeter. No significant natural vegetation exists on .the subject site. 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water: No streams or surface water appear to be located on the subject site. 6 . Land Use : The subject site borders on the south side of S. W. 16th Street. There, is a mixture of commercial and light indus- trial uses located along S. W. 16th between the Valley Freeway and Longacres . The Austin Company ' s main headquarters is located on the north side, of S . W. 16th Street,, just west of the subject site. The new Group Health warehouse and laboratory complex is located directly west of the subject site . The areas south and east of the subject site are presently unde- veloped. However, the site directly south of the subject site has beep previously filled to an elevation of approximately 23 feet; and the proposed Lind Avenue LID will extend Lind Avenue along the eastern boundary of the subject site . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The general; area is in a transitional area from pasture and unde- veloped land to various industrial and commercial uses . Glacier Park Company is presently conducting filling operations approxi - mately half a mile to one mile south of the subject site and has plans for future platting and development of that area . Filling and/or development have occurred directly adjacent to the subject site . G. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer: An existing 24 inch sewer line is located at S.W. 16th Street and Raymond Avenue S . W. Sanitary sewers are also proposed with the Lind Avenue S . W LID. There are existing 12 inch water main along S . W. 16th Street and a 16 inch main along Lind Avenue S . W. Storm sewers are not available in the area . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . Any future development of the site will be subject to the City of Renton standards . 3. Transit; Metro Transit Route 161 operates along S . W. Grady Way approximately 1/4 mile north of the subject site . 4. Schools : Not applicable . No existing schools are located in the general area. 5 . Parks : The subject site is approximately 1/2 mile north of the City ' s 20 acre wetland wildlife preserve area . • • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF AUGUST 30 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : THE AUSTIN COMPANY , SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE , SP-063-77 H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Chapter 23 , Mining , Excavation , and Grading Ordinance. 2 . Section 4-713, H- 1 , Heavy Industry District. I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER- OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS: 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, June; 1976 , page 4, Goals , and pages 5 through 8, Objectives . J. IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS: The subject proposal will disturb present soil and vegetation condi - tions , increase storm and water runoff, and ma, .affect drainage patterns in the area . Traffic and noise level $$ will be increased by the proposed filling and grading operationsJ However, these impacts can be mitigated through proposed cevelopment controls . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS: "' .. Filling the subject property will providena step toward future development 0-lithe site to higher intensity, uses . : There may be some indirect social spinoff effects as a result of such future development. ' 11- L. ENVIRONMENTAL 'ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATIQN: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental !Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43. 21C , a Declaration of Non-significance has been ' issted for the subject proposal (see attached) . This is based upon the previous environ- mental impact statements prepared for the large fill project pre- sently being conducted by Glacier Park Company , south of the sub- ject site and is further predicated upon proper development pro- cedures in accordance with the City' s Comprehensive Plan and other City requirements and suitable impact mitigation measures . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity map and site map are attached. N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . King County Hydraulics Division 2 . City of. Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Utilities Division 4. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 5. City of Renton Fire Department O, PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS; 1 . The subject site is presently zoned H-1 (Heavy Industry) which will permit commercial or industrial future development on the site : The proposal generally conforms to the comprehensive planning and zoning for the area . 2 . The applicant does not have a specific development plan for the subject 'site at the present time . However, he indicates that interest has been shown for development on the site providing the site is properly filled and graded . Future development will be subject to City of Renton standards including the Hearing Examiner ' s Site Plan approval per Section 4-2302 . 2 . 0 and the requirements of the restrictive covenants running with the land . • II II , PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF AUGUST 30, 1977 PAGE FOUR RE : THE AUSTIN COMPANY , SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND. GRADE , SP-063-77 3. An LID has been proposed for the extension of .Lind Avenue S . W. (proposed 80 foot right-of-way) along the easterly boundary of the subject site . . 4. The subject site is adjacent to previously filled property on the south , west (Group Health Complex) , east (Lind Avenue S. W. ) , and S . W. 16th Street on the north. The recently : developed Group Health Complex and the planned Lind Avenue S. W. extension have stimulated interest in development in the general area of the subject site . 5. The existing elevation of the site is approximately twenty feet. This is substantially higher than other areas of the Valley,. Therefore , the site contains no existing wetland or marsh areas . However , because of its location in the Valley, mitigating measures fo'r removal of wetland wildlife habitat must be applied . There can be considered within the SCS' two ' percent landscaping requirement , and other landscaping requirements . Due to the absence of ;any specific re-use plans for; the site at the present time , site plan approval bythe Hearing Examiner at the time of specific site development should be re'q'u':ired ; as per Section ' 4-2303. 2. C . ,1 • 6. The site is, not adjacent to any existing or' proposed ' wetland or greenbelt areas . The applicant proposes approximately three feet of fill to match existing elevations surrounding the subject site (approximately 23 . 5 feet ) . The 100 year flgodplain level as indicated by the Army Corps of Engineers: and utilized for flood zone control permits by King County Department of Hydraulics is 20. 8 feet, With flood protection required to 211 . 8 feet. The, proposed fill will exceed this requirement!.:. 7 . A interim storm drainage plan has been: pro;posed by the applicant. This should require Public Works Depar'tmen,t, approval . The Public Works Department has in the past on similar: fill operations required a berm or dike on the top around the perimeter of the site to act as a retention pond for control of storm water, runoff. 8 . No significant trees or vegetation exist on the site that might possibly be preserved ., The site consists 'of dormant pasture , scrub vegetation and certain stands of deciduous trees the loss of which can be mitigated by proper landscaping at the time of site development. 9. Suitable hydroseeding and erosion control methods will be necessary as an integral phase of the proposed fill and grade project. 10. The Planning Department has contacted King County Department of Hydraulics for review and comments on the subject application . Approval should be subject to King County Department of Hydraulics review and approval . A State Flood Control Zone Permit has been submitted to King County Department of Hydraulics and the Depart- ment of Ecology. Approvals have not yet been received from ' these agencies . P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: I , I Recommend approval of the Special Permit suNect , to : - 1 . Final approval of the engineering design, and supervision of the filling and grading for compliance with the requirements of Chapter 23 , Title IV , including the annual license by the Public Works Department .. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER .PUBLIC HEARING OF AUGUST 30, 1977 ' PAGE FIVE • RE : THE AUSTIN COMPANY , SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE , SP-063-77 2 . Final approval of the uses and site plan for the property shall be required by the Hearing Examiner after conducting of Public' Hearing . 3 . Two percent of the subject site shall be appropriately land- scaped for purposes of mitigating removal ; of wildlife habitat pursuant to the SCS agreement with the City of Renton . Such landscaping shall be' included in the landscaping plans for site development , and be exclusive of other landscaping require- ments . . 4 . The entirelandfill shall be hydroseeded as soon as an integral portion of the phasing and completion of the grading project . 5. Interim storm water retention shall be accomplished via plans approved by the Public Works Department this may include the construction of a berm or dike on the top and. around the perimeter of the fill . 6. Suitable d st control methods ' shall be :Utilized including watering of work ir�as per approval of the Public Wrks' Department. 7 . City streets shall be kept clean of debr, isfrom the fill operation at all times . ri i • • 8 . The Public Works Department may require additional traffic control by the Contractor and/or owner if it i.s .found to be necessary during the isubject' operation . 9. Final approval by King County Department ofrHydraulics and the Department of Ecology of the Flood Zone !Cgntrol Permit for the subject proposal shall be required : , ! ; ! . • • • • l I • • • i INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date August 10, 1977 TO: Planning Department FROM: Engineering SUBJECT: The Austin Company Special Permit, Fill and Grade This division will require an approved temporary sedimentation and detention pond with a designed restrictor, until such time that construction is com- pleted and the approved permanent drainage facilities are operational . The Austin Company will be required to maintain dust control on the side streets and the site during all phases of construction. Curbs, gutters and sidewalks will be required at the time property is developed. Ultimate development will require sewer construction in 16th and payment of latecomers for 12" water in- 16th with some on-site extension probably required. REGDEO AUG ® 1977 ,ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS i TO : Finance Department Fire Department , Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department ff' g .Building Div , Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee) L-4 ___-_46 a-- -( SUBJECT : Review of ECF-_ (p3-77 ; Appl i cat,i on No . :s -- Cic;;3 -77 Action N'ame :_ AuS lkJ 6D ' ____4 (4,(.___FC„L-e-LUI- 11212- '..0...1.- 0712-ACV- Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date)': d )- 77 iI , REVIEW BY OTHERI CITY DEPARTMENTS 1.1 : r Department : vC._�� � —_ Comments : �-- �� ;(`e� (-- - ...7,- Si gnatu of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : ' Department : ----l-' iZL _ _' - ?.G 1'oJ i ... ---- Comments : KTO 5t C. N I G I c.A.,..)'c 14"p ,1— ___ ► i_ ^ : _ __ &".. .3 "r7. >ignature^of D•i re' o or Authorized Rep re,pn i:a ri ve Date 1 / - - I Lt; i Y DLPARTMENTS : • • Department : Comments : • . ; • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • . • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : , • torii.; IV Department : Comments,: NO SV.641FtCAAr7 • 1`4"4"i`FT. /21: Z-ZZ-77 Signature of Di recto or Authorized Representive Date • • _ . • • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • Department : :t ,• Comments : . . • ••Si gnatuF e of ,Director or Authorized Repre,,rive Date ._ • N.LVIEW BY OTHL.: , CITY DEPARTMENTS : • ! Departl:lent : Comments : • , . • . , 'Signature of birector or Anthei.ii4 1t • • PROPOSED/FINAL LL...LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCEi .._N-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SP-063-77 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-263-77 El FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Fill and grade a 10. 3 acre site with an _ existing elevation of 20 feet ± to an elevation of 23 feet ±. Proponent The Austin Company Location of Proposal :Southwest corner of S . W. 16th 'St . and Lind Ave . S . W . Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is ® is . not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . negative Reasons for /declaration of environmental significance : 1 . Proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning for the site and surrounding area . 2 . The subject' site is surrounded by existing filled land and is not designated as or adjacent to a wetland area , greenbelt or drainage channel . 3. This negative declaration is further based upon the provision of proper mitigating measures within the site development plan . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent ok" mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue d' ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible -Offic . al :Gordon Y. ERicksen Title Plann ' gi> ire for / Date August 22 , 1977 Signature ,/-r,1 1A. City of Renton I ( Planning Department 5-76 ' tiff. i- L _ a fi '__ - ' �/, I I l . . . 1 --'R' �= Illq��llllgllll�l ail I I i j �� ERN- Ate;as% ' " I�IIII IIIIIIIIII' IIII I ,I Ihi 1, � �, I �. 5.. :IIIN l p . r� / 1 >�.p R% s ' ' tW1�110. .,. .1.11 oil I i; al co i• I\�i—�\ \\ cam, . -tom ___ ', I'�IIIhi�I pit...,;a Ili I (I `'IIIIHWii� ��� ���1\ �' di IL • ii ajI it 11ts,• I ;,-0,11 0 (IIII#a II Ir _ = Ole. atrivi l l 1 /, - 11. IIIII6 011C1 __--__� --- , __. ___-__21- ,• , . ,,!"•:•!. . _J.._ ____Ii--_ _ ___ 7,,•=7-_ ,L__________=__.„,, ______. ,,,,„ ; ,,,,,-,. I ! - .- ... . li •• • 40S ., ',1 1/4011 ,t :4'.:..litdi:: .1. ',i":,--..617E6,\\. 0 . _, . \ .,. .;,. : ,.i . :,....L.. - - :WEI; 11:•Film .Listi 4,Thai im_mtte .,-,L,:„-i-..::,--„...,.,; ,p1.__,.....____.pm. ,,,,,. ,/ _:. ., . •qui . —71 _ 11j r49,,F r- _ ' _ _J n y s 1 I J�!1 _ ' \ 1 = - _ 1> _ 1- c.--—4.iiiiimiiiimr -- _§\,/- ' i 9 II---.: : — 7 ---?, .:=:. r• :77 c i 1 _- —' - -: L. ---- - j . • f •-� I-- Si a r-- ``2 '�-- t• ..t v. 15 { i S►r� -- ' . .._:_ .._ -- L—i rt /1=1;* � z Is(ls o I i I I 6' Z I I Z ' - I 8 I e a' ., Ta 1 • • 1 T� I 1 i , i i_^ gL \` 1 -j 1 .1 I SPECIAL PERMIT : i' THE AUSTIN COMPANY ; Appl . No . , SP-063-77 ; Special permit to fill and grade ; prope'rty ' located on the south side of SIW. 16th Street between Lind Avenue S. W. and Raymond Avenue S . W. • ' APPLICANT THE AUSTIN COMPANY TOTAL AREA ± 10. 3 Acres . PRINCIPAL ACCESS S . W. 16th Street EX? STING ZONING H-1 • • I EXISTING USE Undeveloped 1 , Filling and grading for future commercial and PROPOSED USE industrial development . I ' I I COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN M-P (Manufac,turinq, Park ) COMMENTS I I I ' l . I . , I I, it • 1 I . . INTO"rieif 111(44144Y G. ow 6 4 • I, iIIIIII i it i i 7 T 7 , 4 A {N co Z - ,c� Z a 0- a 4-RE 2.44AeGIC G- coo0 t -. i i i 1 v1i1 I j .' . % i % / �iiiia�iaai�,jiijai/iaiaiii. _ _ -_ - _ 1 1 i i ' //// ///%%// /%%%�/ //%%/%, __ _ - 1 _ _ - ILL %:. / �% �i, /%%jMI _ ._ _i_ - _. rfoor- __J ./,/, ,,E., / , 1 ' dr,e, A L Tim , ',/%/Z/////4 % 4,-. ,�'./;. , r. /t-_ _ _ _ -1 .r.... •••• ....1 V ZA V/ / h E , , ,,,, .. t- t - - - - -}o �- - - - I- - - 40 - - -- L k 4 - - - - - - I r.. _ _• �r it _ �� _. -- _� r I- - - - -gar .� it ,= - -. — - - - ! ` I aI j._ -ir fir - - � _. ._ CNN Wm., - -• ; }; .,... _ _ _• —• — — L. -J -� i L _ - - - Ir- -- -- - - - - -- - -. 1 _.__ __ _1 t_. _ 1 r MM. _. MONO Jr I Nor 070,4 I ,SC• a es too Sfsed"[- Femur: ao• Sp-043-17 01 410 C.) %re ' OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHING'I'ON 0 ® Hif'r%n7n vyl l".I A':E':,'F In'lLUtiJC ® HEN T'c",,AA',111.`^G:r,^ k+n'd (O. o �Q GERARD M.SHELLAN,CITY ATTORNEY LAWRENCE J.WARREN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 41-f®SEP0-4". August 31, 1977 Mr, L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner City Hall Renton, WA 98055 Re: Setback requirements on applications for special permits-Merlino;Austin Co. Dear Rick: ' Thank you for your Memo dated August 30, 1977 regarding the above matter. Section 4-2314, without question, requires a minimum setback of ten, feet as indicated in your letter . It is your conclusion that a strict interpretation of this particular requirement would produce moats at property lines between the adjoining properties whenever adjacent properties have heretofore established a different grade. You are inquiring whether you may change or reduce the setback lines required by the aforesaid Section without doing violence to the purpose and intent of the ordinance itself. In this connection we refer you to subparagraphs C _and D of Section 4-2301 that you should consider in determining whether a strict interpretation and adherence to the cited Section would be detri-. mental to the adjoining properties . If such definite finding is made, you would have inherent authority to provide for some relief. Alternately, the property owner may seek redress by applying for a variance from the Board of Adjustment. You certainly could recommend such a variance based on the fact pattern that you have outlined. We also call your attention to Section 4-3010 B which allows you some discretion in imposing conditions , modifications and restrictions as you may find necessary to make the application compatible with the environment and carry out the objectives and goals of the City' s Comprehensive Plan and other ordinances. It seems to me that a strict interpretation would result in an absurd situation that would not be in the best interest of the City, and may be detrimental or create other problems , and then in any such case you have limited discretion to modify it. The preferable way, of course, would be for you to request the City legislative body to consider certain amendments to the existing ordinance in order to avoid the situation you have described. Any reduction that you may recommend in this setback line as required by Section 4-2314 should be strictly limited to the facts of this Page 2 August 31, 1977 Mr. L. Rick Beeler particular case and adequate safeguards imposed therefor. If we can be of any further assistance to you in this matter, please advise. We remain, Very /trul urs, E Ger rd M. Sh llan Ci y. Attorne GMS: ds V ' i ir OF Re .► '� THE CITY OF RENTON 7 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 NAL o . Co CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 O4 h. D SEP*1 -' August 30, 1977 TO: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney FROM: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: Setback Requirements on Applications for Special Permits; Gary Merlino, SP-062-77 and Austin Company, SP-063-77 As a follow-up to our conversation yesterday, and as a result of the hearings held today on these two subjects, I am requesting a legal opinion regarding the following: Section 4-2314 of Chapter 23, Title IV, Mining, Grading and Excavation Ordinance, outlines setbacks for landfill. The interpretation of this provision affects these two applications and landfill in general in the Green River Valley. The provision stipulates that the tops of the slopes of landfill will be set back from the "setback line," a minimum of ten feet (4-2314.-2) . Crucial to the application of this ordinance is the definition of "setback line. " The strict application of this requirement in the Green River Valley would produce moats at property lines between properties where slopes occurred and landfill didn't meet the grades of adjacent properties. This interpretation is predicated on the assumption that "setback line" is defined as the distance from the property line to the building line as specified by the underlying zoning district or, in other words, the same as the setback line of a structure. Therefore, Section 4-2314 would require an additional ten feet of setback. Chapter 16.11 of the American Law of Zoning by Anderson would indicate this interpretation to be correct. My conclusion is that the setback for landfill slopes, where they occur, must be measured from the line established for building setback purposes in the underlying zoning. The structure, of Section 4-2314 seems clear in requiring this interpretation. It appears that the additional setback requirement is overly burdensome and perhaps unreasonable in the Green River Valley. An ordinance revision may be more appropriate to resolve this conflict. . . . „ . . , . r - -.! 7.;• -.: i , - .' - ,,, 1 , ,' ii . . . , . .t . • Eiff" 401r.--:1,:-.''I., 'i.: ...., i• - - k.,..f.i.4..,;:..z, -.. .. . trfti.A.....toemP:.44:,;!..,:,4,, ,p0-1.,,,i,,r,,,,A,v,it;10.44-',.4,101.1r4;00, -Wy.,:4',.t,:-.;-'...- .Y.-;r:,...,.--A3f.,-.4,>p,.,...,.,,,,,,.,,,,-;.*-..,-„,...,a;,.;,N:,...„.e.-:z.t.:. --.,..,j0sli oeq;;;vitti.e4114.4.*.:if"..1%:?:%:ti:E,' .t,.$,.--.9.1.i..:..1..:c:CA4i rot,:,.-•;,.. , -,,,,i . , I . .. . '"-' •,k.i 0 .••• - • . •.,• i . 1. '•••••'•'• .4"ter,• 1`•• a ' •, .1t, ,f•'0C.-:. "15341•: IIIIIV .... , • • . • .,.. . .. , '', '• ' . ___......:-,,•to•:.;_i V, . . • II ,... ' • •••'-:,•4'.,.;•.',2 I [--- - --- *: T. . —TiiT . 1. _____-, I . . . • 64. k• ''.‘".---- —• ..„. 1 • ' '',V WI I .• '; • • I . .';''', .•• 1 1-- e . . ••• ,,,:•.,.,.,•.6,:t4.,,,....,.. •• ,,,,,..:•1•.,,..,•,g,,,,,,,,,..,:,,::,.,....,,,,.. 4.4., ow, . - . :•,,, ..-.:.:.„. ...,;,4,.k:•,,,,........., -.,-.4,,l'• ''",-1: 1 ''''-'? . . 1 . . . . A.`f,',,,;:•''-o;.4'• 4::..,..'':•':;,`,.... ,...:",)i..r.j' -',', .. . . r• , . i "floti usi,•Ort'3 Pri• ,.... ..,......._..,.___........._.___ ' 0% t !',•,,7877...,:.:0;,..',45..„1';,._11_',',:il'. 0 ' ' 1. . ® . . *to•.. .0 . ....• .. i6....,......r.,',..,;:.,:. /..,,tx,,:. . ..,.',,,,.::....P•,--: ,^ . -. -.., '?•:.;;;-....;•,,V.0;',.;A.,',1-1?','.-,1*.....4.., ...' 'fr til•'''''";,';.•'. . . "qt.: CI ' ' • ' i t ...,, . • '' • •:,:1.1•C•449'.•,."• '1 • - ,-, 1.kl1(.-;'.?4-'41,tt.,..- 4.,. 4 . _.. I • . , -•'..,.,'..11.'..-".....,,C,-,.,• . ft '"0 4,4 ,iiit 44,:.k..7.11• !. . •.. . -7-7\1 4.---••,'"..:''v , . •1 , . • ,,-••• ::-.,.,,.,:„•,.• ,-.- IP- 'A' bat-A.1.h., 41.-x . • • • ,i !•'' : • ..., .,,.:,...-•;,••••,-#.1J ,T.T.14 ,0•24,0'"'01:',,r-ii,'*%.,',1,..1. '. e .• .• ,. . \. L.: '- ,t ...yr.. (;,; , ' ' '. :i.,:i'Ori', '." '',. - •A''''A4. ,'e'T'=-,,,RA • ,,,,•z•,, 0 i . , .:'••• ....:;,!..,,i, _,,A'4'•t.,,,,,,N,-441,:,,.,..,,,,;4_,, -,4,,...,:b.., , -,. .. ';,:".y•:i,•1'1.-i'e.•,`..0.-F. • • .' .,'.ry•"e . ,'".if' -... , ,ii...1.4..1. 41'"1•'*96 :1:'..:'. ' - 0 I .• .. ., • , ...„ „ . . .' ..-.-,• ..';.)....f..',.'- ',Ii,;.!.1:.t3 e*,:::01 ;`,'AL';'•-•V . . . • - . . . . . ' i 1 ,.'• •.- • '-.',:.'' .7.:7".r . - •'..:;,,s.* :°:1..1.-PO4,,.""ii.t.-.1e',:;1 '.' . I 4no •"-- - O.i \ ® I'II I I •f %. •,.:. '., 1-•/;.4.,'.::,.1 .4'k1cP aP•• :•••,4 .. • • "" • ••• _ tn;..:,cs•.,•.::,r..1.::.:::'..:'..:......:•:..::. ..:'... .!.1:,.;;,. , 7:71,::::-)T.,41'..:;:',. ,*:441,,..,111:?;:; .., • ..... ti t !Well.le•0,004/0' , .:, ' 0 \, v. \ . .. . 1 I • . . 11, \ • • 4.' ,,•••• ',°.• i ' 'I • • . .! ..., —'nA '17, 0' .•,....:::: -,. 4181 ..A1./1 3111..01) 0 ;(€1 0 I 0 I 1 i • 0 i i . , .. --•' .r,-. • ?,....,-.-,S'.•;,•,i,,,-;:c'..;..,*:.•';',;;Ii....:,.:-,,,•-r#4,,,,:-.,,',.• • $ .0 , .... ••••' •4. ' ' 'tt, ..;,•!,:•t7i,";•:::.';',.,•14•1A--.V,rtg,t1,5,.•-r,.; . - 1Z' • 1 •. / t- ,•:','„I./I./I?' . .. . ., . .•,•..,:-.. ,,,,,,-...-'),..t.h.eo:',:,,t4t4A,t! I"' ' ,. It - • • •,, • s• v:J,.,:•t,•4.',,..,.•:.'4,,•t 1.,,g44Ati•krki.."' ) •••,:-.•',...,,?...,•,,...,,;...i.,),c!,-...,:440:v.•,,•' . • . . • ' ' A. 1 • .. • .' " '. • . • .". . 1 '—' . ' . • '•A.1 t,. ))12/41 friV 9 '. . . ,. . • V /17 11 .4/cc.; 12...11, .11....i4r ...Ir. , . ^ -` ' ! , - ',, ' • ',.":;,:',:,..y....z,..,k....lel....',-.•;.,,,,,, 4:':: • . • 1 , 4.0416.03.04111/11111.:'' • i.t / i hic?.`IL-i ..111117 941.e 5' 7' ....‘11.1.; r (.• 4 r ..it, . , , '.. . • .0 . . 1. • . . . . . .. . . . ,. .., •,,, l• , . ..1I ' th•-"./"3 c,.• . - __..i,...'.,'.'spi'\f,19L , . i , u . . ••• : - • . .•—••"":•9"•.;;‘;.••••. • . • ti ; • .- a , • - - -• .. . .• 1\ '11 • • • ••• • ' ••EVON"I C) • .. • •- , '•-, ,,..,...2•',,•••,•, 1 , .1 .4 as Ii. • 40 avt.1 It ..8,00,1 p..tun i444.„, II 1 . • . .. ; • - .' ••.' "•, 1 . -.- ".• - • •• 1 5 --4. . .. , i ti ;• . . ,. , , ..,qn , 1i • .1 '. 6' 4 • ' ." h -44.;.5, -, '- '•'..,..._- !I , I . ;1 • . .. I.',ir's . -t. ''' - • still.,:•,,,, , • •••• ; 1: ., i .1 ; ., • I, pc ,.• I••• , I ' ' •' ''''1;4..;:i4i.,.;.„.‘ .....,•,',,...,'„ 0 ,•. .. . ..•,'.•'ry,.'.f,....,..(_/,1.,,..,,_-I_,,1i"(,,...:•..1 L-.•,.,.r6).., ' /. / _...i...._;._-• _4••.J1 1 t,.i'I 1 n0_) ___• __\.. V---- \ /0 / )( r e A 0 _ L k, •.','' — _ 1I \ .11.9 1.1121C-b0 v(.g1-1 t.•.t8R.tl. ioeioi1,, ®. . . •'.•.-.'„•'.,,,,•...':',..•...•.!,..',.':'-.'.:.1',:„,.„.:..1J1„,;.!.'.::!"4',„,`.,,2,;.':.,.,'.,.'.,,':,,.'.'',,' ...;.''.'•..:-.r.:...'c.,'. -.- 1 Orwrri . • . • , efier,t. ii .. , ... ... . • • ...I r.--ivo9 • - t ' • '.,.., 7 .. ... ,..-....... ., .. . . , i• 3 . ,,.. ., • II I'. . . .. ., . .. . • ' t 1! I , 0,..m3 . -,,, • , :\ t• 1 . ,•le.03'° N, sex/ ., "ii 10 et ' • 03 WM' .1 .. ,. .. • r i :)* ,,,,s..... .01, ,.. . i . ,7... ft. • . ,. •. . I . )11 .., \ ) • • i 1 . . ..'t •, . - . •• )/ti -. ., — 4 . • • ' • . . , . -• • • • , I t .., . 1 f ..: . t 1 : Ei ! 14'"'r % sr . — —.floats,' ti P _a-------...—.----.---.-•---L--- .; __...........______.___,. T _____— . . . . , i • • . I Mt * ' , •• c- . ' 9 . ,,,, „ . is. 7-----3".---0-11, ,2 • 1 •,A4 cz xt lc Eat 1 ii ; i A • SI . .... ., : . , .C,V..-;. . • . ' INTRODUCTION This Comprehensive Plan is the official statement of' the City of Renton which establishes major policies concerning desirable future development in the Green River Valley planning area. The planning area is illustrated in Figure 1'. The southerly boundary is S.W. 43rd Street; the westerly boundary is the Green River and the railroad tracks; the northerly boundary is the Black River and the railroad tracks ; and the easterly boundary is Hardie. Avenue S.W. , Rainier • Avenue South, the base of Talbot Hill (edge of wetlands) and • SR-167 (Valley Freeway) . The Comprehensive Plan consists of the Goals , Objectives , 'Land Use Element (Figure 2) , Circulation Element (Figure 3) , Community Facilities Element (Figure 4) , and Definitions . The Goals and Objectives are to be used in association with and to assist in the interpretation of the three elements . Proposed developments should be reviewed against the Comprehensive Plan to insure that growth is consistent with the Plan. • The purposes of the Comprehensive Plan are:. • To improve the physical and social environment of the City as a setting for human activities - to make • it more functional, beautiful, decent, healthful, interesting and efficient; • • To promote the public interest, the interest of the City at large rather .than the interests of • individuals or special groups; • To facilitate the democratic determination and implementation of City policies on development; i To effect political and technical coordination in development; # • To inject long-range considerations into the determination of short-range actions ; and I To bring professional and technical knowledge to bear on the making of political decisions on the • development of the City. The Comprehensive Plan is intended to help resolve some of the dilemmas confronting municipal officials and the people • they represent. The Plan addresses itself to the major aspects of open space needs. It takes into account existing conditions and future needs , and attempts to express the best reasonable consensus that can be achieved at a given time as to the character and direction of future growth. - 1 I rill V. bi d \\' 11 fill°r I I ill!li r. . •? \,:.s.:::-..:::*:::::::::::::::::.:::::.::::::::;::**:;*::::::::::::.::::::::.:::::::-▪ *: own,• l N. ter. ti I . Fay: �7c�� � �' ; 1 '.. G�Cs)Lt'ri:L,b e.,,..•c+" rp ▪ ••)OOQ4':. ,416-‘ F,Al.. -' g -1,, . : g , lrge.a •.mOE3+ , , i - ., �1 i ry�• a® m ®®a0+ 4 • .aS •e a000. :i.: :, . O - 3,.•nw -': ‘,...-, Y f :::•::*:"::'::::::-:::*:::::::i.:*:l'4-1-:.',, (mill •6: ' 7` ' F.®..o... ii;# Mks _' TALBOT 'oose000... -s r HILL , w+coi•i.ie�oi : ; ''yx Vri' ` K•, � ��~0 0...O.O.® y �xe w� �. •• ��� 4 --,i et, I ;S: -• i ' •'-'2•'- •••••••:••••::*::::*••:*•-•::4 fi �� `� ?�'� 7�• �<",+. CITY LIMITS u 1 •f• t f . (; f *KO' ;1•4�] w j•; 7• `w 4 r .aa .▪ 3 f cD . S y ▪ :g { J' �:ti�: f• ''i •• r. %% `. ;,mow )11 legend: CITY e46/ OF RENTO: ...,:,.....:i::::•::4\::•::::::ttee•,..*•"N%▪• / /7 K hel t LAND USE ELEMENT PLANNING DEPT. t�•:::•::.;::• .....o.. T Manufacturing Park Recreation'•eoo. FIGURE 1 Z ®®®&OOcia Drainage Channel ®®®? Public I 1 GREEN RIVER VALLEY nl COMPREHENSIVE PLAN scale "= 2000' • r -4- ; � l ' GOALS A goal is a general aim or desired end; a broad, long range purpose toward which policy decisions and action are directed. The term is used to connote a very general, long range achievement or performance level, which may require implementation from the combined operation of varying levels of government, or coodinated agency operations at any one level of government.; It is the intent of the City to promulgate realistic and obtainable goals for the Valley that will promote high quality development which will benefit the• community and surrounding jurisdictions , firms and residents. The goals listed below are intended to be equal in importance although some may be more readily achieved than others. • Promote high quality development that will enhance the image of the City. of Renton. • Preserve and/or enhance wildlife habitat. • Enhance the tax base of the City of Renton so all the citizens of Renton are able to benefit. • Minimize noise, air and water pollutants; transportation difficulties; glare, heat; vibration; and other detrimental effects. Promote aesthetics , including views from adjacent hillsides , so developed areas will not be detrimental to adjacent development. • Provide a high quality working environment for employees. • Provide a viable economic climate for industrial firms. • Promote passive and active recreational opportunities that are compatible with urban development. • Promote a diversified economic base. • Development should be designed to minimize rdetrimental impact. • � I i • i I • • OBJECTIVES An objective is a specific p purpose, product or performance level; a middle range of achievement. Several objectives can be proposed to achieve a given goal. A coordinated group of objectives may be required to attain a goal. Just as with goals , it is the intent of the City to establish realistic and obtainable objectives to promote high quality development in the Valley. Since objectives are formulated to accomplish goals , they are more specific and suggest one or more courses of action. • I . For the purposes of this, Comprehensive Plan these objectives are presented separately for the Valley as the over all unit and for the individual sites that will comprise the components of the Valley. In a sense these are inseparable due to their mutually dependent relationship. , However, as a practical matter, property owners probably will desire to subdivide their land and install improvements prior, to selling parcels to individual developers . After the individual developer. acquires the property he will request various developmental. permits from the City. VALLEY OBJECTIVES: Land Use - • Light industrial , office, and warehouse uses and those heavy industrial uses that can be made compatible with goals of the Valley are. the types of developmental land uses intended for the Valley.) 6 Incompatible uses in industrial areas should be discouraged. • Certain areas should be retained in their natural state to meet U.S. Soil Conservation Service requirements and community needs for mitigation of wildlife habitat and open space, • Land uses should be grouped to promote a harmonious) mix. , } • Green belt uses should be expanded into J suitable areas. Circulation - • Access should be limited 'to controlled ingress and egress points to avoid conflicts and congestion. i � • • -6- 9 • i Circulation should be designed to minimize the area devoted to rights-of-way. • At-grade railroad service should cross as few streets and trails as possible to minimize safety problems and inconvenience to other mOdes of transportation. • Streets should be adequately designed to safely • accommodate the types of vehicles that will be used. • All parking, servicing and loading and unloading . of vehicles should be only on-site. • The. possibility of providing mass transit should be considered. Landscaping and Open Space - O A landscape theme and recommended plant list should be established to provide habitat for wildlife and to promote aesthetics . • • Large areas should be permanently reserved and managed for wildlife habitat. 4I A landscaped buffer should be established at the • periphery of bounding streets to create a favorable image; between areas of incompatible land use to minimize differences; and along water channels and wildlife habitats to minimize impact on wildlife. and promote recreation: Al Whenever feasible unique natural features should .be incorporated into developmental plans to preserve the character of the Valley. Design and Development - i Design standards should be established to insure high quality development. • ® Development should odcur in a logical, systematic manner to prevent the premature expansion of • utilities and minimize the possibilities of vacant parcels occurring. Recreation - t The drainage channels, including the banks and. adjacent. maintenance roads , should be used for recreation whenever feasible. • { -7- III • An off-street pedestrian and bicycle path system should be incorporated in the developmental plan , for the Valley. • Whenever feasible wildlife habitats should include recreational opportunities . • Joint recreational opportunities pp sties should be encouraged for the benefit of employees and the community. SITE OBJECTIVES: Circulation - • Internal circulation should accommodate all modes of transportation but these should be kept separated as much as possible. • Ingress and egress points should be well defined to expedite the safe movement of vehicles and people. Parking I Adequate screened and landscaped parking should be provided for employees and visitors. I Large interior landscaping islands or a series of smaller parking lots should be used to break up the large areas of paving. • Where feasible pervious paving materials should be employed to minimize surface water runoff.. Landscaping and Open Space , - . • A maximum' amount of appropriate landscaping should. be permanently established to provide wildlife habitat. • Large amounts of landscaping scattered throughout , the site including along property, lines are encouraged to provide a pleasant environment, minimize the impact of the development and, enhance the visual experience from the adjacent properties , including hillsides. Y • • -8- • Areas set aside for future expansion should remain in the original state or rehabilitated to support wildlife until the expansion is needed. • Whenever feasible unique natural features should be incorporated into developmental plans to preserve the character of the Valley. Design and Development - I • The site layout and architectural treatment should be compatible with the characteristics of the site, and the design standards of the Valley. • Less aesthetic uses , such as loading areas and outdoor storage areas , should be adequately screened and landscaped and placed so they are not visible from adjacent public rights-of-way. • Roofs and other features of the site that are visible from adjacent hillsides should be designed to minimize visual impact. • All utilities should be placed underground. O. Firms with large numbers, of employees should develop outdoor recreation facilities. • The latest technology should be employed to. minithize adverse characteristics . it y I i ' I 0 Ft cc* .o ',6M,0,4.,.y, o THE CITY OF RENTON " MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o 4 �' _ CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER co- 4 L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 1P.1 ED SE P1 ' August 24, 1977 MEMORANDUM TO: Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director Warren Gonnason, Public Works Director FROM: Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: Austin Company Special Permit No. SP-063-77 At the August 30, 1977 public hearing on this application, I will need the following additional information: 1. Copy of restrictive covenants. 2. Any resolution number for adoption of the Soil Conservation Service requirement for 2% landscaping in wildlife habitat. 3. What would constitute ". . .appropriate landscaping for purposes of mitigating removal of wildlife habitat. . . "? 4. Amplify what constitues keeping city streets clean and dust controlled. Some of these questions are duplicated in my memorandum dated today regarding the Merlino Special Permit. Therefore, any response can include both applications if applicable. This request is for the same reasons as outlined in the aforesaid memorandum. Thank ou.„% // RECEIVED �,.. ............. . . CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER Rick eeler AUG 3 01977 AM PM RB:mp ' t8t9tlOrlttd2il t2t3t4r5r6 gk cc: Mike Smith, Planning Department XH BJT NO 7 ITEM NO. 5/°- 6 3- 7 7 �. .�.-.. OF R� THE CITY. OF RENTON (.; 43.0,.' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE..SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o °' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235 - 2550 grFD SEPt -v- MEMORANDUM I � August 26 , 1977 TO: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen , Planning Director By: Michael L . Smith , Associate Planner . RE: THE AUSTIN COMPANY SPECIAL PERMIT NO.. SP-063-77 • Attached is a copy of restrictive covenants relative to The Austin Company as requested. , • With reference to your -other questions , please see our memorandum of August 25th regarding the Gary Merlino Special Permit request. wr Attachment • • • RECEIVED C1TY OF :AENTON HEARING EXAMINER . AUG 2.51977 AM .. . PM 1'18i9110e11112111213i415,i b) t 3IQD 71, c , y METRO Ir;i::j;'. ,.1: .'� D.i::;'':;.:(: ,' � ;�c' >;;.. ..'�_', ( :+.:� .. <. of the re:a called the r:.:tro Troct, on `J.'; , i•' Conditions cove. J t...:' called covenants) here.:.nn to _.t .Lor;:h, e,..oh , ..la. c:: :;: ' for the benefit _ c..: :i and ,:':.. of the l i_ c : and for C :+.0 1 to o the benefit of anti pods with l_ile A',-,'C.l., c:.aria cn(...! and G' evo. thereof, and shall apply to and i): the ;; - „ �.i -- - .:�:�...:,1.Y ,. r.. ii1 owner thereof. • NOW, TEEREFORE, Grantor hereby declares that the T a.. •ct is, c. lei �a held, transferred, sold, Conveyed and occupied u:)ject to the co'1nri;::':t,s here set forth. CLAUSE I ' DEFINITION OF T:E.'iZ''"•' "Building Site" shall mean any lot, or portion thereof, or two or more contiguous lots or portions thereof, or a p arc: 1_ of land in the Tract upon which a commercial or light industrial building or buildings and appurtenant structures may be ' 1 erected in GCS:11:U::::)";iiCC' with the require- , lnentS of these covenants. "Improvements" shall mean and include a coi:,mea:c.:_cnl warehouse, or iigi.t industrial building or buildings, outbuildins a J ri ela: . thereto, pa rk- ! ing areas, loading areas, fences? masonry walls ., hedges, lawns, mass plantings and any structures of any type or kind located above ground. ' "Building line or lines" shall mean the maximum distance which commercial warehouses, or light industrial buildings and outbuildings or any Shall s t' ruc^ tures of anyty e or kind located above ground b- sot a,,cf from the property or street lines, "Side Building site line" shall mean the boundary or property line divi-- ding .two.adjoining building sites. CLAUSE II GENERAL PURPOSES OF CONDITIONS ' The Tract is subjected to the covens nts to insure proper u;:,v ..net C ovclop rent of each building site; to protect the owners of build.ln_(:: site. against improper use of surrounding building sites as will depreciate tL_'' • value of their property; to guard against the erection thereon of sti:.:..^_tur•.: built of 'improper or. unsuitable materials; to insure adequate :":c ::ena .)1, develo;."''c'nt of the' Tract; to encourage the erection of attro.ct'!ve ... 7c ' merits thereon, with appropriate locations thereof on building .ios; to 7)Y_ir• vent haphazard and inharmonious improvement of build..:i )..ng _.t _ S�_:mil - 1.: r� `.'J : ..+ and maintain proper set-backs from streets, and - 1=;::� frees between structures; and in general to provide ,nattily for a. h gh and quality of improvement in the Tract. • (Continued) milv , A. No noxious or o :Zc__•, c1:lVtil111t:f be done J-� '': 1 _,^ _ ac;j _.�.v . .,:... bc. C�.:..:... �.,.. C-. ..',:. ... :1 h l..i!' '�l a1:' .,i 1..'..',' ,)`., o b..-c:ci:.2 an anncr,' :'la: o:: i.cn '' the ir_act by reason of 1-_.. ;ic*,��.1,; the ..c_:, dust, fumes smoke , G. C' `.C,:";, Ci:.: iiC B. Without otherwise lir.1itinc.1 • l_1:C. Provisions ofi'c.1:�L��r�ij7a A G... J_ _:, �.....,... III, or any of the other ii r �:1: terms and conditions of 'i;'_ covenLnt, ; buildings or premises, except as otherwise 1 i _ covenants, maybe used fort_J. l._ any use permitted L nea r a;pPli.c;blo c; .c-nwnn:.-,nntal zoning regulations, r as the ,same now exist' or as s - hereafter be � .; l.cie,. same ,'-1';v�: :.,-' , .- .�- � amended,- except the following uses shall. not be permitt•.:' '. : • 1. Auto wrecking, salvage yards, used -s balingof material y�.:_c.�:, ;;•;:.crc�r;: ci:,: waste or scrap papery rags, scrap metals,. bottles : Or junk; 2. Bag cleaning; A( 3 .• Boiler and tank works; 4 . Central mixing plant for asphalt, mortal:j plaster Or concrete. C. Improvements erected on the Tract shall ll not exceed thirty-five : (35) fec . in height, Without the written. approval of the Grantor. D. No improvements as herein defined shall be erected, placed 'or altered c any building .site until the building or other improverient plans, spec .i__ca;•- tions, and plot. plan showing the location of such improvcacnts on the parti • l cular building site have been submitted to and approved ' i n writing ,as to conformity and harmony of external design with existing structures in the development, and as to location of the improvements on the building site an as to location of the improvements With respect to topography, 'grade and finished ground elevation, by Grantor, unless and until such right. has been . expressly assigned, and then such right will pass to such assignee., The Grantor, -its .Successors or assigns, shall not be liable in damages to any one so submitting plans for approval or to any owner or owners of lane. covered by. this instrument by .reason of mistake in judgment, negligence o:': non-fe asance of itself, . its agents or employees, arising out of or in cnn- nectioIl with the approval or disapproval, or failure to approve any' sa :1 plans . Any one so submitting plans •to the Grantor for 'approval, by ,he submitting of such plans, ,agrees that he or it •will not bring any action or suit to recover for any such damages against the Grantor. In the event Grantor sails to approve Or disapprove such design and location with:;.n thirty (30) days after, plans and sneci. icati.ons ha 'en snbmi it , .:his c JC:nC'.nt will be deemed to have been fully complied with. I: the con- struction -or alteration Of improvements or extension of trackage is beclun in violation of the terms and conditions of this S`? . v�lOYl j) or �'ii'L•.. CAL:'.: ,.::, writ Len approval required in other Sections hereof c'.n0 suit th, erection, establishment or alteration of si'.ch i t to u!__J'):_:i :trackage O 1 to .'1�. GJ. 1:.. .�.• _..J:a r✓.. has been commenced. prior t the com: l_c::.en thereof, to . cbiC.'.;:�, ', , will be deemed to have been full co:lz2li_e c' with, i cf `� . ' - any aJuiiu:i.ilcj site line iJ:.: Y(_'" ee . _ L- 0nun c 'a1 of ci l: ..lC'_:a.`�l. G�.'...._'.:�f f(7 t�• t shell _•• i::... ._. _:1 is _ .... separately owned irlil: C '- ... ..'ii i.:; 1.): :1 i. i :... C:i : .' ty line adjoins a dedicated, a l_.j_ey, ;. a; ty line shall not apply, �., _`� -:. r ,- -� s ;--'c;•�-,.. ..� .. .tic; "._.,:L'. , i".:..� 1 :. ,;: f; _r�,-�__ railroad its ., . .-.. .. ,._ .._, i,,:.... �- .�.at:�:c. ,=c thefr hroad company, successor or s C :,_.any building ., cl _C71. '� _1Ct:� reer _ site, no structures Or bi'.:..Ld-•r.. r ri clAlt--G�-•[•ray or any �;;" thereoft - •��:�.:::�..i. be �:.c:",::t:I:uc;; - c". :" I tl C except with :C_ [':,:i."�.'i'en consent o _ ee a • No building or structures shall 1 be closer than„•" : - _:ty (SO) feet -- e--t t 153rd S re ,t or thirty L2O ; ';? - tot,h ErQ ; streets tr` i "wi: in the Tract. Improvements on any building si.te ;, a? : not occl - r more t ,`n of the site. The materialT t� 3 �.slC. facingI[:=:. ,_G:C" O-- the j)., j _CA_Yi r - rz. l be concretet. in t_ t:shall l block, brick steel or othera� .. _ _/�t_c Grantor. f ' , ..._.i�.-.L:!.cL�. Ci?:;7: ( �lCs T ' • L No building or. structures _lines, `��S and cla�0'VC^. C7:Oi:2"?.C�. ;'.�1� � ! Ei:.C.- .�c beyond�-i , the area between the building lines s building ! J l_i:t. the property I ,. 1� is COl..O�1:�� used either7 F -0�/'.�� ` J lines for� s Opera landscaped Ci and C` ",^.,_ ,-'-,'` or _.. f street sur- . faced parkincr areas. i f 1 1' s t 'si ., � , lawn, trees, shrubs, �.1d �Cc^i ��C<: i- 1Fa-' + am C;.O:1C?' c Grc Gi V ly with �_. aU � ' .! hr , etc. , according to plans i::!:�.. t approved in ['::::."C__.n by Grantor.�.o_ . used for off streetthe _ i n: ' must parking, �-il�. parking arrangements t.J and surfacing be approved in writing by the Grantor. Any>r,•�- } v�ll�� `_((�� _ /� (-/�/-+ condition. landscaped and+"'erIcin\� areas shall i e maintained in. good • G. The location of loading facilities where sh _ a _ vi are required shall be subject to the • v ArC� d o . . n; cioc}. approval Ali a_ the Grantor. . N. Power.used in any establishment in the Tract . shall be confined to elec-- trica l or .substantially equivalent type of power using only oil, gasoline, q as or liquid petroleum products or similar combustible materials in its production, or other products which do not produce excessive smoke, 'odors • or �uA:,es. • I. For each light manufacturing, jobbing, warehousing, wholesaling or other use permitted in the area subject to .these covenants, there shall be provided Off street automobile parking facilities, such facilities to be c p71_oved in writing by ' Grantor but o based er to be C;ei"i:.._ ally at the minimum rate of one parking space for each three employees to be employed on the premises 1 y0". The storage of bulk commodities shall be confined 4 leeninci thereof as i O locations and s:. approved in writing by , 7 X. Railroad right-of-way easements may . � J o "n�..., bC'-. granted by Grantor on any in cc? simple thereof.ty in the Tract so long as it is the owner - proper • . L. No bill boar is orNrn. "` '-1-1 Strir signs other than those identifying ' � �C name, business andproductsthe '"' of person or firm occupying the premises shall be permitted, except thatL c , p a sign n01._ to E:;%';C'_e'_'. ten (10) feet by - twenty (20) feet in size offering the premises for sale or lease may be permi t ted, . • . • N0 No fence, masonry wall, hedge or mass planting shall be 'permitted to extend beyond the building lines establishes.; hee it except writing by the Grantor. l�L1Cl.Li:i ., :Ile .:o , l', '- :.'ncn �. N. S'ilicnc\-i_`r the l.'..i:. n nvnl U,, t,:o :.. Cl..l:. . C:•... with any 1.I:1.)i"o:'aL;..n L:.' orc o L:t..:. C'_: i li i:; reci, required by the pl:ova..,iC„:n o : chenL' covolle.n s, •` n...'_ shall ;.,il CjCi'•!C C..•" bv the conditions set 1C.i i '.! in Section 1),, c_i.anne .1 1 ! i.C:::"i:Ui_ „ 0. Each of the conai.t .onfi, covenants, rest:Cici ? C:n:i and re::e;:'Ja _a.C'i1 forth above shall continue and be b .ndinq upon t,]._ Cnnnto:: ::.:.: Llji!'':1 i;" successors and assiCjns and upon each of them and all 1 rtS.e::: and. allr. r Sons claiming under them for a pe iodl of twenty-five 1.ve �(2�i) V�::::::.::� fro:.l d,:te hereof. Reasonable deviations ' from these covenants may b.-.. permitted upon t'1a prior written approval of the Grantor . • P. These covenants shall run with the land an:; bind the owner of each nor tion of the Tract, its successors and assigns, and all part:_ agree to conform to and observe them, but no covenant r ,: 7 be personally G any corporation, parson or persons, except in r2n22ct to breaches Coi:iiJ .._ during its, his or their ownership, and G:_a:1.'t br or the owner or owners G : any of the above land shall have the 1 : c1: to �: : 1G. and 0.. .: il an ia jh':... t. prohibitive J �; ,_ ._`_ + " J o enforce the tion or mandatory to p,-1 'l.'.1� the fJ.,. c.C:+: OJ. or �� G:)Servance of these covenants, in addition to the ordinary J.ccel action fc da71a es, and the failure of Grantor and.. the owner of any other lot or lc-,::-: or building sites hereby restricted ted to enLo'� at ' • � J 1 + a � '();,::.'i :'�� of the covenants:.�iit,.�J .`?. time of its violation, shall in no event be dee:::C: to be .a waiver of th.. right to do so as to any subsequent violation. Q. Invalidation of .any one of these covenants or any part thereof by judgments or 'court order shall in no wise effect any of the ,Cither provi- sions wn3.ch sha.Ll remain in full force and effect. . • • • • • • • • • • • , r , , . 4 • ... • . . .Auditc.,:,..: s -...••'.:..1.....: ::.., . c,... , .. , .. ... • . . . . . .11::' :!:.,' A . . . . . , Lots 11 to 48 incluive -.1.n ..t.J.10;:k .1. .i an0 z-J11 of YV.1.0ekl-, '.,-;), !.'..,,, ',-! , 32, 33 and 34 (how vac:22.;..,6 ) of C. )„ 1-Ii111,.:-.;n' s -.v.;erlin-ton t•!•,.. , Addition to the City of S(..attle Div.i:;iGn No , 1, az.: p•or •,lat -..-... o, :.-0.:,...; • .•:;..; , in Volume 17 of Pits, on page 74, records of King County, •:;-:•_'• 1 portion of Lots 12 to 29, inclusive in said Block 19, convc.y,..,0 to th-,': .::,,• State of Washington by Deeds recorded under Auditor' s File No . 391 ::,30 f.•.:. • g, 1 and No. 4554803, TOGETHER WITH vacated streets adjoining; ALSO, $2•'''. the north 15 feet of the following described property: .4* ; tV; All of the vacated Blocks 23 and 24 of said C.D. :Hillman' s -2arl.ington '7;fe.• ' Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division No. ',1, TOCI. Zi.-...E1,', the west one-half of vacated street • adjoining 'ssid Block 2'4. on the east, rt ! the. cast one-half of vacated street adjoining said Block 2 on the west, and all of the vacated street lying between said Blocks 23 and 24; . --•-e. • ,... , . . Also, EXCEPT , all that part of the following described tract "X" iYing , . -? .• •• easterly of a line drawn parallel ' with and bein-4 50 feet distant westerly, i.:7• . 6.i'ff. r whenv,easured:at right angles from the FL Line Survey of Pr. :-.-.ary State 4 1 Highway No. . 1, Jct . SSH Na. 2-M to Jct. TSH No. 2 in Renton; said tract 'flk. i : • "'X ' bein described as . follows : .-..:, . • .... • _ . . . . ,r, , • , : Lots . 11 to 48, inclusive in (vacated) block 19 of said .C.D. Hillman' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division No. 1; W.• EXCEPT that portion of said Lots 12 to 29 inclusive, conveyed to State of Washington for road by deeds recorded under Auditor' s File Nos . 7.,•.• , . - , r Or . • 3916580 and 1454003, records of King County; situate in tile City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. .'„, • • . • . • • .., , • ., • •,,,;,- . • . , . . . . .14-,'. 1 • . . . ;;;i4's• • . . . 4 oz-) . • ' . • '.. ' - • • 444 1 • • . - . , t •,i I . . • . . • : •'''' , ' . . . , • • . . . • • • • A '• ' • .. . - • , . ;%1? • • . . " - ,,'.i•r:' . . ,N;•.`-. - • . .. - . ',';';!i'...' 1 . . . • . A'• ..11;:•; , . . • •••" ''' , .. . •.1.•.1.:•• • ' r. • . , . . • . . , • .• . 1 . , . . ". .1 • •. , . . , • I . • . . , - • ' i • • , 1 . . . • . . • •• 1 , . . , . • .. .• , . . , , • - 1 , •• ' tJ 4 OV R� I 4. „ ,Naropr THE CITY OF RENTON 8MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 O Nemo CHARLES'J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT ?,oco. 235 - 2550 li 0 �4TF0 SEPSt4e MEMORANDUM August 25 , . 1977 RECEIVED. TO: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner CIT1f OF REfdTOM NEARING EXAMINER FROM: Gordon Y . Er.i cksen, Planning Director AUG2 51977 PM By: Michael L. Smith , Associate Planner AM 1 7,8,9'10,1l,12il its 3o415i6 RE: GARY MERLINO SPECIAL PERMIT, NO. SP-062-77 e The following information i,s presented in response to your memo, randum dated August 24 ,. 1977: 1 . Availability, of water to site - Ron Olsen of the Utilities Division of .the Public Works Department can best answer this question. However, in discussing the matter with him, 'it was his intention to simply comment on the fact that although water service is'. available, to the site , the main will need to be: extended to City standard across the entire frontage at the time of specific site development. 2. Storm drainage retention -. This is also .a matter to be s'pec.i'- fically addressed by the Public Works Department. However, our report did include a discussion of this element and a' recommendation on the method of retention similar to that which has been recommended by the Public Works Department for similar projects . 3. Retention o.f north 74 feet for P-9 drainage . channel- The ' Renton Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, June 1976 ,. Objectives , on pages 5 through 7 , outlines various objectives to be established as development review policies. Attached is a copy of this document, with specific references to ele- ments that would apply to the subject proposal . The land use element of this plan indicates this area for location of a deaipage channel . King County Hydraulics Division and. City o'f Renton 'have required retention of proposed channel areas in previous pro- jects . One specific project is a previous fill by Mr. Merlin() - I I II, . i I L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner August 25, 1977 Page Two south of the subject site. Attached is a copy of the Plan- �. ning Commission decision. Discussion with King County . Hydraulics Division indicates that they will establish a similar requirement for the proposed project. Also attached is a copy of a City resolution establishing City policy to participate in the proposed drainage channel project. 4. The City Council adopted the Soil Conservation Service require- ment for 2% landscaping in wildlife habitat by Resolution No. ! 1923, (See attachedj 5. Type of landscaping for wildlife habitat - the Soil Conserva- tion Service has compiled a . list of those species best suited for provision of wildlife food and/or habitat. It is rather extensive and covers many species native to the area . Other. materials areavailablie which are helpful in choosing land- scape materials suitable, for this function. Compatibility of landscape plans to this requirement can be reviewed at the time of specific site development. 6. We have not received any. comments to date from King County Hydraulics regarding the subject application or the Tripp- Harper project.. Telephone discussions with them, however, have indicated they are in the review process ; and there are no significant problems except for retention of the drainage channel areas . . 7. Dust and mud : control Section 4-2321 .8 establishes the need for control of dust and mud both on-site and on City streets . The Public Works Department is responsible for enforcement of this requirement. We hope that this has clarified any questions you may have. If you need additional information, please contact this department or the' Public Works Department. . MLS:wr Attachments cc: W. Gonnason, Public Works Director r . • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON m n , - RESOLUTION NO. 1923 • WHEREAS the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, has submitted to the City of Renton,as well as other cities,/Rhag County., a letter agreement dated June 3, 1974, for the purpose of evaluating environmental setting within the Green•i River area, -and , '. WHEREAS the City of Renton elects to become a party to any such agreement, NOW THEREFORE • . !,' TIME CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and . directed to execute that certain Letter Agreement dated June 3, 1974, a true copy being attached hereto and incorporated herein, on behalf , • of the City of Renton. SECTION II: No City funds shall be expended for the acquisition ' ' . of any property within the subject area, or commitments made therefor, • without prior approval of the City of Renton, and subject to applicable budget laws. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 22nd day of July', 1974. ' '\. . ;d 7. Delores ad, Ci y Clerk '•''' APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 22nd day of July, 1974. '.''.', .'''.. - (i! • . . A r.y ( rirr, i t; Mayer , Ap ved as to �' , Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney °04:1 . ' ? y 1 ��w ° . - ,:4,,,j, .. , . ., c „j rr ! ....................................... _ , . ,..,., • , -2- The sponsoring local organizations will : 1 . Purchase in title or perpetual easement and maintain in public control �t-. during the life of the projects at least 110 acres of suitable wetland .A, 0 habitat at locations approved by the SCS and the Washington State Department of Game. • 1 2. In granting commercial-industrial development permits'with the Green iRiver Flood Control Zone District require: a. , A landscape development plan that will provide reasonable consider- F ation for wildlife and esthetic values (environmental quality) 4for the area planned for buildings and parking lots; te'' 1 p� b. a significant portion (not less than two percent) of the land i i involved be designated and commerce-industry managed for the life of the project to produce wildlife habitat for species best suited to site, conditions, and location; i L F. c. all land not needed or used for other purposes, be planned and s.• �, managed for wildlife open-space until such time as tit is utilized 1,--. q in additional developments. 1 � 1 3. With Soil Conservation Service assistance, preserve or,replace existing 1 wildlife habitat along affected channels. t 1 4. With Soil Conservation Service assistance, provide fish passage through structural measures where deemed necessary by the Service and the s Washington State Department of Fisheries, . 5. Adopt and enforce a land use plan (policy) consistent with the regional land use policy of the Puget Sound Governmental Conference or the + Regional Planning Authority having jurisdiction before Public Law 566 k funds are expended on any part of an independent system. I am in agreement with the above, If you are in agreement, please sign in the space provided and return to the Coordinating Sponsor (King County) for r further processing. 1 F fit\ / / ! TGalen S. Bridge Date `;f',� -/ ', 7% State conservationist r Green River Flood Control Zone District ,By �." 4� � ; Local Organization � Room 900 K.C. Adm. Bldg. Seattle War.it/DbLector' DiZector ul tic Works Address " Zip Cod � �• ; Date ,. , a/ O Ye C. UNITED .A F—`EPARTMENT-O CUL I ----r ., SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE Room 360 U. S. Courthouse,F Spokane, Washington 99201 ;w:; • June 3, 1974 71 Mr. John D. Spellman County Executive, King County • • King County Courthouse • Seattle, Washington 98104 L King County Engineers Office Green River Flood Control Zone District y Room 400 King County Courthouse • '"`3 Seattle, Washington 98104 Mr. Ralph Backstrom. I ' Chairman, King 'Co. Conservation District 35 South Grady .Way Renton, Washington 98055 a Mayor Frank E. Todd • ' ' City Of Tukwila City Hall - PEI 14475 . 59th Avenue South t I Tukwila, Washington 98067 Mayor Avery Garret I i City of Renton ! City Hall • ;,,;. 200 Mill. Avenue �outh I `4 Renton, Washington 98055 ` l • Mayor Isabel Hogan 1 r.-:. City of Kent • City Hall ... I� P.O. Box 310 +d Kent, .Washington 98031 i Mayor Stanley P. Kersey • City Hall . City of Auburn • 20 A Street Northwest • Auburn, Washington 98002 { Gentlemen and Ms. Hogan: r o., It is essential that, enviro.nmental considerations be fully recognized in,:c carrying out the East and West Side Green River Watershed Work Plans. An s evaluation of environmental setting and project measure impact reveals the need for agreement between the •sponsoring local organizations and Soil m Conservation Service on the following. I. e� . �. . °"1 SC 5 PRESERVATION OF NATURAL AREAS In the Soil Conservation Services (SCS) "Proposal for Reten- tion and Improvement of Non-Wetland Wildlife Habitat in Green ' . River Watersheds," the SCS states, "In many areas, habitat along channels and streams represents the last remaining habitat in the valley suitable for pheasants, California quail , abbits , (musk- • rats) , ,and many species of songbirds. As urban buildup continues in the Valley, habitat areas become more and morejcritical and must be retained to preserve at least remnant popilations of many wildlife species." i , • } • SCS is requiring that the sponsoring agencie' provide "wild- };. as• life - habitat" mitigation areas in the Green Riv r Valley; and ' unless all governmental units having jurisdiction within the Green River Watersheds pass such resolutions , the floodwater channeli- ,-':,i I. • nation program may be deleted from Federal Assistance funding. , ;' METHODS OF INSURING HABITAT AVAILABILITY: ',' 1. Preserve existing habitat where possible. `' 2. Replace habitat where lost -through construct•ion•. - Establish plan for replacing lost habitat and establishing additional areas prior to time contracts are let for revegeta- , tiny disturbed areas. 1. Require all landfill areas abutting any of the pro- '^ • posed channels to preserve an area adjacent to the °. • channel for wildlife and esthetic purposes - minimum 10-15 feet wide and run entire length of property bordering the channel . SCS PROPOSED WETLAND MITIGATION SITES FOR SPONSORS' CONSIDERATION: • South of •FAI 405 - east of freeway, SR 167, running south • , ,,, to a point just north of 180th Street. Preserve entire . area. .'t, ' • Type III - approximately 35 acres (An upstream water control ;.;, structure and a riser on the highway culverts would enhance this area. .`'°', '[ Four 'blocks north of 180th Street - between West Valley . Highway and railroad. • Type IV - approximately 8 acres. Seven acres additional . land suitable for upland habitat in horseshoe-shape of . is wetland. Type I and III will have the greatest project induced impact • on wildlife habitat. Type' I - seasonably wet but dry during most of the growing season. In project area - used by wintering ducks. ,. i - Type III - generally wet through most of the growing season • with water depths of 6 inches or more. Used for feeding . and nesting. . SCS PROPOSAL IOR CONS!ULNAIION: . CONDITIONS FOR OBTAINING A PERMIT TO DO LAND FILLING . 9b 0R CONSJ IJC I iON . 1. Develop landscape plan. • • a. Consideration for wildlife and esthetic values (environmental quality) of area around buildings , • and Parking lots. . 2. Percentage of total land be designated; planned and managed for wildlife best suited to site, condition and location. a. ' Area to remain as wildlife habitat for perpetuity or "X" number of years. 3. All land not needed or used for other purposes be ' planned and managed for wildlife or allowed to revert back to original conditions. ,t a. Remain as oPen space until such time it is needed for further development. RESULTS: 1. Provide much of the mitigation that may need to be j j,. provided by the waterhsed project sponsors . , 2. Preserve open, space and greenbelt areas (however small ) "• ' ; throughout the developed portions of the Valley. 2. Assure perpetuation of many wildlife species which otherwise would be gone from the Valley. ti. °t . / nay'ip4:,% ' . .—) CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 1970 WHEREAS the City of Renton, a municipal; corporation, operating as a non-charter code city under the Optional Municipal Code, has heretofore executed certain agreements in connection with the Green River Water Shed Drainage Plan, and { ' WHEREAS King County and other cities are likewise participants and subscribers to said•Plan, and WHEREAS various meetings have heretofore been held for the purpose of considering alternative methods of project implementation in erder to accelerate the proposed development, and WHEREAS it has further been determined by the Soil Conservation Service that the Eastside Project, including the City of Renton, could be implemented at an early date, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The City of Renton hereby're-affirms its participation and concurrence with the proposed Water Shed Project, as heretofore ratified by written agreements, and; further concurs in the implementation and construction of the Eastside Project at the earliest possible time. .�. • is • SECTION II: The City Clerk is hereby authorized to certify t'1; copies of this Resolution and forward 'same to King County, Soil Conservation Service and other cities affected by said Eastside Project. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 17th day of March, 1975. e ores A. odd, City C eY . APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 17th day of March, 1975. fA ,i� zTnf�t� /1 ' It- very � tt, Mayor • s. Appr ed as to form: Ge176rd M. Shellan, City Attorney /v l /, . Renton Planning Commission Meeting June 26, 1974 Page Four Committee, stated that at its meeting of April 17 the Com- mittee recommended that the special permit to fill and grade be granted, inasmuch as it was their opinion that the area • was unsuited for the location of a wildlife sanctuary due 1. Y. ' to the proximity of a• railroad right-of-way and highway. Discussion ensued regarding desirable locality for a wildlife ' sanctuary and whether or not an EIS is appropriate. It was . then MOVED BY SEYMOUR, SECONDED BY SCHOLES, THAT THE PUBLIC • HEARING BE CONTINUED UNTIL JULY 24, 1974. A roll call vote • was requested with the following result: . Humble - No Gibson - No Morrison - No • Ross - No Scholes - Aye Seymour - Aye . Mola - No • MOTION DEFEATED. The Planning Director again stated that continuance- was recom- . mended to allow sufficient time for staff review of the environ- mental assessment. ACTION: ' MOVED BY SCHOLES, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR, THAT THE ITEM BE REFERRED TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND REPORT BACK AT 1,:\ THE' JULY 10, 1974, MEETING. • Discussion followed regarding whether or not the matter was al- ready in committee, the preogative of the Planning Commission to , grant or not grant permits to fill , and the suggestion by Commis- • sioner Morrison to give the staff authority to act after their environmental review. . On the question, a roll call vote was called with the following r`;), result: , Humble - No has Gibson - No ' ' Morrison - No ' Ross - No Scholes - Aye Seymour - Aye Mole - No MOTION DEFEATED. ACTION: MOVED BY HUMBLE, SECONDED BY ROSS, THAT THE APPLICATION BE CONTIN- UED UNTIL THE JULY 10, 1974, MEETING, WHEN A STAFF REPORT AND COM- MUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT IS ANTICIPATED. MOTION CARRIED . UNANIMOUSLY. • � . D. MERLINO, GARY; Appl . SP-768-74; special permit to allow fill- ingT and .grading in L-1 zone; property located at 3000 East Valley Road. , -;',. Staff comments were requested by the Chairman. • Mr. Ericksen stated that it was the staff's 'opinion that an envi- ' ronmental assessment was not necessary based on present use of >, s•• - Renton Planning Commission Meeting June 26, 1974 • Page Five the 5.8 acre site. He noted that the property is presently zoned L-1 and partially filled. Approximately 2.8 acres are presently filled, and approximately 3 acres are unfilled. The unfilled areas were pointed out. Based on previous data from the applicant and review with Soil Conservation Service am King County Hydraulics, the staff recommends approval . wizh provision that the easterly 87' of the site be retained in its natural state. •.. Commissioner Humble noted that the Comprehensive Plan Com- mittee had made its report, also recommending approval sub- ject to retention' of the 87' easterly strip. Should the drainage channel be relocated to the other side of the free- way, the area could be eventually filled. • . Discussion followed regarding other reasons for not filling . the easterly 87' of the site, including drainage, wildlife sanctuary and need for future setbacks. . . Comments were invited from the applicant by Commissioner Mola. Mr. . Gary Merlino, 8630 Fauntlee Cr., S.W. , Seattle, stated ' that adjacent property owners had filled easterly portions • of their sites. . Responding to Commissioner Morrison, -the Planning Director indicated that it would be the public agency's responsi- • • bility to remove dirt from filled areas planned for the drainage channels. Mr. Ericksen also stated that the Com- ' • mission can require development plans to. be submitted regarding ultimate use of the property, in accordance with the Mining, Excavation and' Grading Ordinance. Mr. Merlino cited rising costs as a reason' for filling the area now. Responding to Commissioner Humble, he stated that filling of the entire site is expected to require.four . • years and require an additional year to solidify. ;,,, Following discussion, ' it was MOVED BY SCHOLES, SECONDED BY ,, SEYMOUR, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. MOTION CARRIED UNA'NIMOUSLY. • ACTION: MOVED BY SEYMOUR, SECONDED BY MORRISON, THAT THE GARY MERLINO APPLICATION TO FILL BE GRANTED SUBJECT TO: 2. RETENTION OF THE EASTERLY 87' OF THE SITE IN ITS NATURAL STATE UNTIL THE FINAL DRAINAGE CHANNEL LOCATION IS ESTABLISHED. • 2. PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS WHEN THEY ARE PREPARED, INCLUDING SETBACKS, BUILDING LOCATIONS, LANDSCAPING, SCREENING, STORAGE, PARKING • ! AND CIRCULATION.• . 3. ADDITION OF THE TWO PERCENT SOIL CONSERVATION • SERVICE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENT TO BE INCORPORA- TED AT SUCH TIME THE REMAINING 87' IS FILLED AND • C. :' A PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS PRESENTED. • • C " ' Discussion followed regarding the requirement for site plan approval , as provided for in the Mining, Excavation and ' Grading Ordinance. On the question, MOTION CARRIED, ROSS DISSENTING. .y •: v �1 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 OpA °% CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER(o. 0 L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 43,Tf® SEPW4N- • September 28, 1977 ' Mr. Paul Arnett RE: File No. SP-063-77 The Austin Company • • 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Arnett: • This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of September 13, 1977, . has not been appealed within the time period set by ordinance, and therefore, this application is considered final .and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. • Surely • L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner LRB:mp� cc: vDel Mead, City Clerk • Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states : That on the 12th day of September , 19 77 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this VZ day of See -2tAfx �� 1911 . kL<C)A- - \ -U9)( Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: The Austin Company, SP-063-77 (The minuteb contain a £L t of the pai tLe6 of necond) 1 ,I ••-t- -- • MAIN AND RIM FLOTATION TUBES ARE 8" TO 10" (203 TO 254 MM) IN DIAMETER , MAIN AND RIM FLOTATION 7UBES ARE SPACED AND SIZED TO PROVIDE DESIRED BUOYANCY CHARACTERISTICS.I , FLOTATION IS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 100% EXCESS BUOYANCY. ALL MOVABLE COVER ACCESSORIES ARE BONDED ELECTRICALLY TO THE COVER! WHICH IS TOTALLY ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVE IN NATURE AND WHICH IS ITSELF BONDED .ELECTRICALLY. TO THE TANK TO ELIMINATE ANY STATIC SPARKING HAZARDS, ALL •ACCESSORIES ARE• BRACED WITH 2 SUPPORT BEAMS ' RESTING ON . ADJACENT CLAMPi! BEAMS. 'I COVER TO SHELL SEAL • °"I"In.nRluv/-11Qumn/' *io,1 ,,� RIM FLOTATION TUBES • • TO SUIT PRODUCT "°t� .0``� ! I , MAIN FLOTATION TUBES o``��� I 111111 ,'*,� SUPPORT LEGS •TANK .�`` / � `'•,.1_4.1 � I .� VARIOUS SHELL o �1 •'� • ACCESSORIES �� LOCATED I N , . .., • ►�:I . i'I ►'-` ,'• FIELD TO I . II `I� SUIT ACTUAL 4.�� ;t \• .CONDITIONS r_1 I'I1 ail I I �1 I. I ' ' �- I �II Ili II! 1 .' I II.gI 1 1•1 raw%el 111 1 µ 1 g I II or I r . 13.E I4I I • t • i '''''',N.., r;:i !! ! 1 .I �r Ti COLUMN WELL ,', r;i :S, I y AND COVER FOR N, II + EACH COLUMN 41 / ,,i/N� I ��•``` DECK SKIN CLAMP BEAMS wwu.uYAiwu""'tj°L' DECK SKINS (S *U.S.PATENT NO. 3861555 OTHER U'.S .AND FOREIGNNPATENTSARENT PENDINGR CLARITY) • IzottOFESs�n„y* ULTRAFLOTE CORPORATION. -,, ��� K•ttaa NFL 3p TYPICAL PLAN FOR o s �' 1 a °� �'n �� AN ULTRAFLOTE* COVER rtT' I4 o +�._.., i, OF AVERAGE DIAMETER li.I 2251 a�� TNIS DRAWING Is THE CACLUSIVE PROPERTY OF ULTRAfLOTE CORPORATION. ITs ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES AN AGREE• OF O \ MINT THAT IT SHALL SC TIR[AT[O Al A STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT AND IS TO SE RETURNED UPON REQUEST f1y STMCC ) AND IS NOT TO SE COMMUNICATED.DISCLOSED.OR COPIED EXCEPT UTNORIE[DIN WRITING■T ULTRAFLOTE CORPORATION: •V HAN [DATIL417�72 ' REV. 2/1 2/75 I DWG. NO. 20098 September 13, 1977 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINE CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. APPLICANT: The Austin Company FILE NO. SP-063-77 LOCATION: Located op the south side of S.W. 16th Street between Lind Avenue S.W. and Raymond Avenue S.W. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests special permit, pursuant to the City's Mining, Excavation and Grading ,Ordinance, Chapter 23, to allow approximately 3 feet of fill, together with grading, on an approximate 10 acre site. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval with conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on August 23, 1977. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on August 30, 1977 at 10:40 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the representative for the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: Vicinity Map Exhibit #3: Cross Section of Landfill Exhibit #4: Site Plan Exhibit #5: Resolution No. 1923 (reference only) Exhibit #6: Documents from Soil Conservation Service (on file with Planning Department, for reference only) Exhibit #7: Memorandum from Hearing Examiner to Planning Director and Public Works Director, dated August 24, 1977, and respective responses, dated August 25, 1977 and August 26, 1977. In response to the Examiner's inquiry regarding submittal of a geology or rehabilitation report, Mr. Smith stated that neither document 'had been submitted although the applicant had indicated that hydroseeding would be accomplished and the Planning Department would require the procedure upon filling to meet ordinance requirements. The Examiner stated that clarification of Section 4-2314 of the Mining, Grading and Excavation Ordinance would be resolved with the City Attorney. He inquired if the landfill operation would be accomplished in phases. Mr. Smith indicated that the fill'would occur in, a simultaneous operation as soon as possible in order to allow for development. • SP-063-77 Page Four 4. The storm water drainage plan for a surface retention pond has met with preliminary approval of the Public Works Department and can be further refined by the applicant with the department prior to issuance of the Special Permit. 5. Per Section 4-2303.2.0 the final uses and the site plan must be approved by the Examiner. A public hearing will be held and the Examiner must conclude that the uses and site plan conform to the Comprehensive Plan and are compatible with the vicinity as well as the applicable zoning requirements. 6. Sufficient access exists via Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 16th Street. In the attached memorandum of September 9, 1977 the ,Public Works Department stated that any problems occurring during the filling operation can be resolved on location. 7. Dust and mud control as recommended by the Public Works Department and accepted by the applicant is sufficient to meet the requirement of Section 4-2312.8. 8. Section 4-713(D) (e) (H-1 Zone) specifies the building setback lines as 60 feet for the front and 20 feet for the sides. An additional 10 feet of setback is added by Section 4-2314.2 (Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance) to these building setbacks whenever the fill does not meet the adjacent property but forms a slope. In this request the fill will meet the adjacent property on the south and east property lines. A slope setback will not be necessary in those areas. However, along the west and north property lines slopes will occur which must meet the applicable building setback lines plus the additional 10 feet setback for slopes. The Examiner requested a legal opinion regarding this matter in the attached memoranda dated August 30, 1977 and August 31, 1977. Existing ordinances (Chapter 23 and 30) prevent the Examiner from granting a variance from the slope setback requirement of Section 4-2314.2. However, it seems appropriate to comment upon the effect of this additional setback requirement. The setback of Section 4-2314 is intended to ". . .preserve the setback for the safety and benefit of adjacent properties, the adequacy of foundations, and to prevent damage as a result of water runoff or erosion of the slopes." (Section 4-2314.1) The purpose of Chapter 23 is to ". . .protect. . .areas and uses. . . against detrimental effects" (Section 4-2301.C) and to "Promote safe, economic, systematic. . .grading activities. . ." (Section 4-2301.2.D) . Application of the setback will accomplish these purposes; however, it may be counterproductive in instances. A moat could be created if the fills do not meet - a setback area equal to double the building setback area and 10-foot slope setback for "protecting" each property. This appears not to be the intent of the ordinance. The intent seems to be to require landfill to be set back from adjacent property, where the landfill may be detrimental to that abutting property - a clear case of protection. However, in other instances nothing detrimental can be shown, but moats may be created around neighboring properties undergoing landfill operations. It appears in this case that a variance should be sought from the Board of Adjustment. In addition, Section 4-2314 should probably be revised to accomodate a wider range of situations. DECISION: . Based upon the record, findings and conclusions, the grading and filling Special Permit is approved subject to: 1. Landscaping of 2% of the site for wildlife habitat purposes per the landscaping materials suggested in Exhibit #5 as approved by the Planning Department. This landscaping is to be installed upon completion of the landfill operation. 2. Finalization of the storm water retention system and its approval by the Public Works Department. 3. Dust control be implemented by water sprinkling. 4. Control of mud and debris on adjacent or affected public right-of-way be implemented by a mechanical sweeper adn water flushing. 5. Exposed slopes are to be hydroseeded to control erosion. 6. Fill material will conform to the requirements of Chapter 23, Title IV. 7. Tops of the slopes to be no less than 10 feet from the building setback lines established by Section 4-713 (D) (e) . ' li . I SP-063-77' Page Three 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. . 1 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The proposal is compatible with the required setback requirements of Sections 4-713 and 4-2314 of the Code. 8. Future use of the property is confined to those uses specified in Section 4-713 (Heavy Industry) of the Code and review by the Examiner per Section 4-2303.2. ' 9. The property is'bordered on four sides by existing landfill as a result of construction of Group Health warehouse and laboratory and Raymond Avenue S.W. on the west, S.W. 16th Street on the north, the proposed Lind' Avenue S.W. on the west, and an existing fill on the south. 10. Vehicular access to the property will be from Lind Avenue S.W. to S.W. 16th Street. It is anticipated that the existing city streets will be adequate to accomodate this traffic under the control of the Public Works Department. 11. Storm water retention at this stage of development will be, accomplished via a retention pond per Public Works Department approval. This' method may be altered or discarded during construction of buildings on the site. 12. Existing public services are adequate to handle the fill operation. 1 13. The proposed, fill will reach an elevation' of 23.5 feet which is 1.7 feet higher than the tentative flood level established by the King County Hydraulics Division. That DivisiOn's review of the application has not been completed, but is essential to final approval of this application and the Flood Zone Control Permit. 14. Dust.control is proposed via water sprinkling. 15. Control of mud on city streets is proposed via a mechanical'sweeper and a flush truck. 16. Erosion control of the fill is proposed to be accomplished by hydroseeding all slopes. . 17. Section 4-2314.2 requires a 10-foot setback from the build;ing' setback line in instances where slopes occur and'the proposed fill does not meet the grade of adjacent property (see attached memoranda dated August 30,, 1977 and August 31, 1977) . . 18. Fill material will conform to the requirements•of the Mining, Excavation and • . Grading Ordinance, Chapter 23, Title IV. 19. The fill operation will occur on a continuing basis until completed. Fill ' r material is to be imported from a site in south Seattle. . 20. Wildlife habitat of 2% of the site is required per the U.S. 'Soil Conservation Service and City of Renton Resolution: No. 1923. 1 CONCLUSIONS: ' 1. The proposal generally conforms to the Green River Comprehensive, Plan with the exception that wildlife habitat must be provided on the site. It appears that the requirement of 2% of the site to .be landscaped in wildlife habitat 'can be . • accomplished utilizing perimeter ,screening. The Planning pepartment has on file several documents (Exhibit #6) outlining the landscaping materials suitable for wildlife habitat. ' . ' 2:, Fill material should be inspected periodically by the Public Works Department for conformance to Section 4-2316. 3. Section 4-2303.2.B requires that the Examiner conclude that the fill activity • ". . .not be unreasonably detrimental to the surrounding:area." Based upon. the • evidence submitted in the public hearing and the physical IcharadteriStics of the site, the proposed landfill' is compatible'with.and similar 'to existing landfill operations in the immediate vicinity. Restrictions are necessary to control erosion, facilitate storm water drainage, and-to mitigate loss of• ' wildlife habitat. These conditions will make the Special Permit not detrimental' ." ' , to adjacent properties and the surrounding area. ' . SP-063-77 Page Five 8. Public Works Department monitoring and approval of access and traffic control. ORDERED THIS 13th day of September, 1977. L. Rick Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner . TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of September, 1977 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Paul Arnett TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of September, 1977 tothe following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before September 27, 1977. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examineris based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from'the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said office. 4.: 41 0 THE CITY OF RENTON `®° 40MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH 98055 o `�+,11, • CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ( 0 472- L. RICK BEELER , 235 -2593 4-0 SEPIt August 30, 1977 • TO: Gerard M. 'Shellan, City Attorney FROM: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: Setback Requirements on Applications for Special • Permits; Gary Merlino, SP-062-77 and Austin Company, SP-063-77 • As a follow-up to our conversation yesterday and as a result of the hearings held today on these two subjects, I am requesting a legal opinion regarding the following: Section 4-2314 of Chapter 23, Title IV, Mining, Grading and Excavation Ordinance, outlines setbacks for landfill. The interpretation of this provision affects these two applications and landfill in general in the Green River Valley. -The.provision stipulates that the ,tops of the slopes of landfill 'will' be set back 'from the "setback line," a minimum of ten feet (4-2314.2) . Crucial to the application of this ordinance is the definition of "setback line. " The strict application of this requirement in the Green River Valley would produce moats at property lines between properties where slopes . occurred and landfill didn't meet the grades of adjacent properties. This interpretation is predicated on the assumption that "setback line" is defined as the distance fromjthe property line to the building line as specified by the underlying zoning district or, in other words, the same as the setback line of a structure. Therefore, • Section 4-2314 would require an additional ten feet of setback. Chapter 16. 11 of the American Law of Zoning by Anderson would indicate this interpretation to be correct. My conclusion is that the setback for landfill slopes, where they occur, must be measured from the line established for building setback purposes in the underlying zoning•. The structure of Section 4-2314 seems clear in requiring. this interpretation. It appears that the additional setback •requirement is overly burdensome and perhaps • unreasonable in the Green River Valley. An'ordinance revision may be more appropriate to resolve this conflict. Bf l Gerard M. Shellan Page Two ' The hearings on the above subjects have been closed but continued for a brief period to allow for your legal opinion on this 'subject. As soon as your opinion is received I will forward copies to the applicants and complete my decision.. As was indicated in our telephone conversation, if the landfill must indeed be set back ten feet from the building . setback line, the applicants would have to make application for a variance from this requirement. I would appreciate your response within ten days. L. Rick -eler LRB:mp cc: Mike Smith, Planning Department 9 • I t f, • of .s 1. ®® OF'F'I(: I•; ( 11• 1 1i F: L '1 i 'x ;\'I"1 ( ►K `. I:l ® ii i . '. i i . , i • '� :z �. o 0 rn P,o p o �Q- GERARD M SHELLAN,CI7Y ATTORNEY LAWRENCE J WARREN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 4T1.0 SEPIt° August 31 , 1977 • • • Mr. L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner City Hall Renton, WA 98055 • Re: Setback requirements on, applications for special permits-Merlino ;Austin Co Dear Rick: . Thank you for your Memo dated August 30, 1977 regarding the above matter. . Section 4-2314; without question, requires a minimum setback of ten feet as indicated in your letter . It is your conclusion that a strict interpretation of this particular requirement would produce moats at property lines between the adjoining properties whenever adjacent properties have heretofore established a different grade . You are • inquiring•whether you may change or reduce the setback lines required by the aforesaid Section without doing violence to the purpose and intent of the ordinance itself. • In this connection we refer you to subparagraphs C and D of Section 4-2301 that you should consider in determining whether a strict interpretation and adherence to the cited Section would be detri- mental to the adjoining properties . If such definite finding is made, you would have inherent authority to provide for some relief. Alternately, the property owner may seek redress by applying for a variance from the Board of Adjustment . You certainly could . recommend such a variance based .on the fact pattern that you have outlined. We also call your attention to Section 4-3010 B which allows you some discretion in imposing conditions , modifications and restrictions as you may find necessary to make the application compatible with the environment and carry out the objectives and goals of the City' s Comprehensive Plan and other ordinances . It seems tome that a strict interpretation would result in an absurd situation that. would not be in the best interest of _the City, and may be detrimental or create other problems , and then in any • such case you have limited discretion to modify it . The preferable way , of course, would be for you to request the City legislative body to consider certain amendments to the existing ordinance in order to avoid, the situation you have described. Any reduction that you may recommend in this setback line as required by Section 4-2314 should be strictly limited to the facts of this Page 2 August 31, 1977 Mr . L. Rick Beeler particular case and adequate safeguards imposed therefor . If we can be of any further assistance to you in this matter, please advise. We remain, Very trul furs, Ger- d M. Sh,Ilan Ci y Attorne GMS: ds � I MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9, 1977 TO: Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner FROM: De1..Bennett, Deputy Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Austin Company Special Permit No. SP-063-77 We have reviewed the Austin Company's proposal to deposit land fill on a site located at SW 16th Street and Lind Ave. SW. We do not feel that their proposed means of access will create any unusual traffic problems. If any problems do occur during their hauling process, they can be resolved at that time. We normally work with the earth moving contractors during their hauling and filling operations, and; this project will be no exception. I DCB:ad \ RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER F.1) 21977 AM ¢M 718,911Q11111211121:314(. en6 1 I r — • M- P - . .►f .. • _' - 1 1 , H _ ,�.A kit f n(0••'"‘•M�<; i y'' I 'q • 1,d 1, I .,.,'.' 1:;fl,i ( �- b 6 • r, Iv • IL. , ( I :HI, „i(.tl I r M ,.' .y� '1 �iT11a1illI 1I// ( II _ - • •• p .• ; (1 )T\' ..„., , „ � . : ' .. :. - `: ' ,t ram! L- , , ` fSr, fp ii.L.J.4,„ I l ago ,, B-I I.,;�I W G. �,. , . •• •' 4 ' h ,. .. G _ • � .�,. ' . l , C -i S-ram . ✓• u " •'w ��, ;�* ,1 :u, •III, iT. .l1 ,7, li a, • ` I'� . .. r�R- f ;'� �IMINr GI. . ,�-,-r de\\ , [ r • • • sure ,. , •'� L-I . :, •.• I .� r !� ., .*'-_-. , 727.? r 1 1; \ Si r: , ,' .i: . . • I . SPECIAL PERMIT : THE AUSTIN COMPANY ; App.l . No : SP-063-77,; Special permit to fill and clrade property located on the south side of LW. 16th S'treet' between Lind Avenue S. W. and Raymond Avenue S. W. • • . APPLICANT THE AUSTIN COMPANY TOTAL AREA ± 10. 3 Acres . PRINCIPAL ACCESS S . W. 16th Street EXIS11NG ZONING H-1 EXISTING USE Undeveloped • Filling and grading for future commercial and PROPOSED USE industrial development . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN M-P (Manufacturi'nq Park ) COMMENTS ' 1 . . _ ._____ /- ;- rr rFri -t- T •ti -t• --1 -1,--riv- -t:__ _ _ 1 ' , 1 illillitiri : Ii lir, i__ _ _ _ 1 1 III iiiiIIIIIII 11-1114--ii — 4 ! 1 11161% i L - I ' i .. ! . ' . I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I li 1 I I I i I 1 1 li I 1 I I 1 I -I I li_ I _ I I I i I 1 1 I I I I r----° -1. 1 I II 1 I I I I---- - , t VACATED AsavAioArt. Avg r rrrrrrrrrr-r-1 -1 -1 -rrrrrrT-i- rrrrT -0"•""Tt '- 1111 .11111111111 , 1111IliiiiitAl : 1 =' cN El El i i I i I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 i k,-,11 i i i IA .4 ..t_AA,, , Lim 1 I 1 1 1 ' I 1 I I I I t:h 4.111I-':**,laski4 ii 1. L.I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 , .1‘..: It,:4-.:4 ,,...... ......... ... ...... 0 i-I 7 7 r 1-- I- 4- " 4- - ,....-1-44: :: 4::•.1444+ta;t61 I 1 1 1 i , 1 I I I I I 1 1 1701.44,,AwN4,,A.: „ 1 , 1 I 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1111 • 1 ll 1 0.-: ...43:4-...i: :'::- ::-vtv 0 u 1 1,.. 1 1 1 E 1 1 1 1 1 = i I ii4: : -: : . :4Y- : -,*st)-4 kr -\ z ‘1‘ II : 1 1 1 : il 1 11'4,14.0: : - -"'"&‘::A's'4 ` ' 111 4. .1-1... I 4-1-I I I I i J-i- i, I I 1 tie4,4‘ aor epf44v, c, 4 ,. •-.;a4N f4"tet.A Ave sPI 1 -riI rn I rrr rer ttr-ael . '‘`\ . - " itiIIIIII -. -N,k.- - ,...., •‘ \ ' 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 I I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I I\ 'AVy \ \\-..‘„*-Ns.‘\\ .' •\;,.•\\•\ x 1 1 1 iii 1 1 IIIII ' llii r I I IN I /.. -4. i 1 1 I ik -'-'•- • ,\'-,,,\' , -4-:p,.: \ _ _. I _ it. 1 1 1 1 I r I 4 + .I- t- t--I -t i 1... t.,_ 6....I\ \`\\" , • .- \ ';\,y,_kl___-\‘*';':', `A ' &I J kIN I \ .'\ .. '4-7 *- - • --t -I-I- .4- -a i I I 1 I , I I I 1 IV] ' I' I 1 L **•,:. -,,s _ --.-44tt. • I i 1 1 . ' Iliiiiiiii 1 1 1 .\. \.,‘::-.: .,,, , A. .:::-.\- N K '' \ , .\Vi.ss'..-4•' illiala 1 r4) 1 - ,i i 1 1 , -4 k,.. . ‘,‘-t• i'\\ I v% 1 lilt , It Is. 11 . I I i I 1 1 I I 1441°111'1%4 1 1 I. III 1 1111 ! 1 1 1 9 e i 1 Ili ' 1 \ \4\ \\\' ' ; _,.At‘,1\,,,,,\`‘.,,-' 4 • Olt TA Iti no- °paw 2%1,1 hvilovie.. Si" ‘... ... -- 1T-11-7 I 1—rT I-T-r I "FT IT 1-r-I TT i-ri-r giN t t X A TA 1 i 1 i I 1 1 I I I i I I i I I I 1 1 I ill11111 , •....,..„,..,... N is: t i 1 % II II IiiiIIIIIIII ' lliiiiiii • ca i s .... h 1111111111, 1H111111. : 1111 1111 •3 .: 'V o L:::] (r, 1 1 1 A '1-1 --1 Ail. L LL. '_i_t_l_l_LI 1 ' a 1 I I I 1 1 I _ 0 , 11111111i It ri -I 1 rrr Ft t"" I 1 1 I 1 1 11 : 11111111iiii I 111111111 : 11 ! ! ! IIIIIIIii iii , Iiii II _ .., iii , . 1 . . , 1 : 11111 , 1 ! 1 ' 4 °- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON AUGUST 30 , 1977 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . DUANE A. WELLS AND VAL BAIN , APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT OFFICE AND LABORATORY BUILDING IN M-P ZONE , file No. SA-061-77 ; property located at Lind Avenue S .W . and Tenth Avenue S .W. 2 . GARY MERLINO , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN L-1 ZONE , file No . SP-062-77 ; property located at 2900 East Valley Road . 3 . THE AUSTIN COMPANY , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN H-1 ZONE , file No . SP-063-77 ; property located between Lind Avenue S .W . and Raymond Avenue S . W . on the south side of S .W. 16th Street. Legal descriptions of all applications noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. • • ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 30 , 1977 AT 9 : 00 A . M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED August 19 , 1977 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , MICHAEL L . SMITH , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES ' OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn /' • to before me , a Notary Public , 72 � ,i.' on the 10�'^_ day of �� ..k / r � %'" 19 7-7 . SIGNED /��Ct , �1✓ PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 30 , 1977 APPLICANT: THE AUSTIN COMPANY i FILE NO„ SP-063-77 , SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests special permit, pursuant' .to tilie City ' s Mining , Excavation , and Grading Ordinance , Chapter 23 , 'Ito allow approxi - mately 3 feet of fill , together with grading , on an approximate 10 acre site . !! B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record: THE AUSTIN COMPANY 2 . Applicant: THE AUSTIN COMPANY 3 . Location : Located on the south side cif S. W. 16th Street between Lind Avenue S. W. and Raymond Avenue S .'W.. . 4. Legal Description : Detailed legal de;scriptionlon file in the Renton Planning Department ) 5 . Size of property : Approximately 10.3 acres. 6. Access : Via S . W. 16th Street and Lind Avenue S . W. 7 . Existing Zone : H-1 , Heavy Industry; with 'estrictive covenants . HeavyIndustry ; M-P, (Manufacturing 8. Existing; Zoning in H-1 , the Area : Park District ; L71 , Light ;Industry ; and G, General Classification District. 9. Comprehensive Land Manufacturing Park. 1 '` Use Pla 10. Notification : The applicant was notified; in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the ,Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . Notice was also mailed to surrounding property owners . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The purpose of the request is to allow filling and grading to an elevation ' consistent with surrounding properties , which would ini - tially prepare the site for future industrial and commercial development. D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The site and general area was annexed to the City on April 14 , 1959 , by Ordinance No . 1745 . The subject site was rezoned from G to H- 1 , Heavy Industry District, on May 7 , 1962 , by Ordinance No . 1955. .' Certain restrictive covenants were established at the time of the rezone to . run with the land. These covenants deal with permitted uses , setbacks , landscaping areas , and other site development require- ment . The area immediately surrounding the site has been previously filled to an' elevation of approximately 23 feet. • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF AUGUST 30 , 1977 PAGE TWO RE : THE AUSTIN COMPANY , SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE , SP-063-77 E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The subject site is relatively level . 2 . Soils : Puget Silty Clay Loam ( Pu ) . Permeability is slow, and seasonal high water table is at or near the surface. Runoff is slow to ponded , and erosion hazard is slight. The soil is generally used for row crops and pasture . l � 3. Vegetation : The site consists primarily of scrub grasses and abandoned pasture area with various 'deciduous trees scattered around the perimeter. No significant natural vegetation exists on the subject site. 4 . Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the ite provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water: No streams or surface water appear ; to be located on the subject site. 6 . Land Use : The subject site borders on the "s, outh .side of S . W. 16th Street. There. is a mixture of commercial and light indus- trial uses located along S. W. 16th betweenthe Valley Freeway and Longacres . The Austin Company' s main headquarters is located on the north side of S. W. 16th Street; just west of the subject site. The new Group Health warehouse and laboratory complex is located directly' west of the subject site . The areas south and east of the subject site are presently unde- veloped. However, the site directly south of the subject site has been previously filled to an elevation of approximately 23 feet;, and the proposed Lind Avenue LID will extend Lind Avenue along the eastern boundary of the sybject site. F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: i The general! area is in a transitional area fromipasture and unde- veloped land to various industrial and commercial uses . Glacier Park Company is presently conducting filling operations approxi - mately half a mile to one mile south of the subject site and has plans for future platting and development of that area . Filling and/or deve; opment have occurred directly adjacent to the subject site . G. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: An existing 24 inch sewer line is located at S.W. 16th Street and Raymond Avenue S . W. Sanitary sewers are also proposed with the Lind Avenue S . W LID . There are existing 12 inch water main along S . W. 16th Street and a 16 inch main along Lind Avenue S . W. Storm sewers are not available in the area . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . Any future development of the site will Le subject to the City of Renton standards . 3. Transit: Metro Transit Route 161 operates along S . W. Grady Way approximately 1/4 mile north of the subject site . 4. Schools : Not applicable . No existing schools are located in the general area . 5. Parks : ' The subject site is approximately 1/2 mile north of the City ' s 20 acre wetland wildlife preserve area . I PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF AUGUST 30 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : THE AUSTIN COMPANY , SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE , SP-063-77 III 1 H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: • 1 . Chapter 23 , Mining , Excavation , and Grading Ordinance. 2 . Section 4-713 , H-1 , Heavy Industry District. I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR Ol HER 01-F I CIAL C I TY DOCUMLItTS: 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, June , 1976 , page 4, Goals , and pages 5 through 8, Objectives . J. IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS: The subject proposal will disturb present soil and vegetation condi - tions , increase storm and water runoff , anq may affect drainage patterns in the area . Traffic and noise levels will ; be increased by the proposed filling and grading operations . However, these impacts can be mitigated through proposed development controls . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : • Filling the subject property will provide a. stop toward future development ofithe site to higher intensity! uses . There may be some indirect social spinoff effects as a result of such future development. L. ENVIRONMENTAL.ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: I Pursuant to, the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43. 21C , a Declaration of Non-significance has beenl1ss1ed for the subject proposal (see attached) . This is based upon te previous environ- mental impact statements prepared for theilarg4 fill project pre- sently being conducted by Glacier Park Company south of the sub ject site and is further predicated upon properidevelopment pro- cedures in accordance with the City' s. Comprehensive Plan and other City requirements and suitable impact mitigation measures . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity snap and site map are attached. N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . King County Hydraulics Division 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Utilities Division 4. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department 0, PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS; 1 . The subject site is presently zoned H-1 (Navy Industry) which will permit commercial or industrial future development on the site . The proposal generally conforms to 016 comprehensive planning and zoning for the area . 2. The applicant does not have a specific development plan for the subject site at the present time . However , he indicates that interest has been shown for development on the site providing the site is properly filled and graded . Future development will be subject to City of Renton standards including the Hearing Examiner ' s Site Plan approval per Section 4-2302 . 2 . 0 and the requirements of the restrictive covenants running with the land . I- , PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF AUGUST 30, 1977 • PAGE FOUR RE : THE AUSTIN COMPANY , SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND, GRADE , SP-063-77 3. An LID has been proposed for the extension Of Lind Avenue S . W. (proposed 80 foot right-of-way) along the easterly boundary of • the subject site . . 4. The subject site is adjacent to previously filled property on the south , west (Group Health Complex) , east . (Lind Avenue S . W. ) , and S . W. 16th Street on the north. The recently : developed Group Health Complex and the planned Lind Avenue5S . W. extension have stimulated interest in development in the 'general area of the subject site. H 5. The existing elevation of the site is approximately twenty feet. This is substantially higher than other; areas of the Valley. Therefore , ,the site contains no existing wetland or marsh areas . However', because of its location in the; Valley , mitigating measures for removal of wetland wildlife habitat must be applied . There can be considered within the SCS' ;two percent landscaping requirement , and other landscaping requirerients . Due to the absence of ',any specific re-use plans far the site at the present time, site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner at the time of specific site deveL,opment should be required as per Section 4-2303 . 2 . C .i 6. The site is, not adjacent to any existind or proposed wetland or greenbelt areas . The applicant proposes approximately three feet of fill to ;match existingelevations surrounding the subject site (approximately 23. 5 feet ) . The 100 year fl'oodplain level as indicated by the Army Corps of Engineers and utilized for flood Zone control permits by King County Department of Hydraulics is 20. 8 feet, with flood protection required to 21 . 8 feet. The proposed fill will exceed this requirement .' 7 . A interim storm drainage plan has beenpropiosed by the applicant. This should Tequire Public Works Department approval . The Public Works Department has in the past on similar fill ' operations required a berm or dike on the top around the perimeter of the site to act as a retention pond for control of storm water runoff. 8 . No significant trees or vegetation exist on the site that might possibly1 be preserved . The site consiftslnf dormant pasture , scrub vegetation °and certain stands of deciduous trees the loss of which can be mitigated by proper landscapingat the time of site development. 9. Suitable hydroseeding and erosion control methods will be necessary as an integral phase of the proposed fill and grade project. 10. The Planning Department has contacted King County Department of Hydraulics for review and comments on the subject application . Approval ; should be subject to King County Department of Hydraulics review and approval . A State Flood Control Zone Permit has been submitted to King County Department of Hydraulics and the Depart- ment of Ecology. Approvals have not yet been received from these agencies . P, PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : i .. Recommend approval of the Special Permit' subject to : 1 . Final approval of the engineering desi n and supervision Of the filling and grading for compliance Wit the requirements of Chapter 23 , Title IV , including the annual ; licepse by the Public Works Department. . j I , PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT , TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF AUGUST 30, 1977 PAGE FIVE . RE : THE AUSTIN COMPANY , SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE , SP-063-77 2 . Final approval of the uses and site plan for the property shall be required by the Hearing Examiner after . conducting of Public Hearing . 3 . Two percent of the subject site shall be appropriately land- scaped for purposes of mitigating removaliof wildlife habitat pursuant to the SCS agreement with the City of Renton . Such landscaping shall be included in the' landicaping plans for site development , and be exclusive of other landscaping require- ments . 4. The entire ; landfill shall be hydroseeded as soon as an integral portion of , the phasing and completion of the grading project. 5. Interim storm water retention shall belalccomplisred via plans approved by the Public Works Department this mayiinclude the construction of a berm or dike on the top and. around the perimeter of the fill . 6. Suitable dyst control methods shall be Utilized including watering • of work areas per approval of the Publid Works Department. , , I 7 . City streets shall be kept clean of debrifrom. the fill operation at all times . 8 . The Public Works Department may require 'additional traffic control by the bontractor and/or owner if it is ' found to be necessary during the ;subject operation . • 9. Final approval by King County Department. gf .Hydraulics and the Department of Ecology of the Flood Zone Cc$ntrol permit for the subjectproposal shall be required : el P i • I1 i ! • , I • • INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date August 10, 1977 e — TO: Planning Department FROM: Engineering SUBJECT: The Austin Company Special Permit, Fill and Grade This division will require an approved temporary sedimentation and detention pond with a- designed restrictor, until such time that _constructionis com- pleted and the approved permanent drainage facilities are operational . The Austin Company will be required to maintain dust control on the side streets and the site during all phases of construction. Curbs, gutters and sidewalks will be required at the time property is developed. Ultimate development will require sewer construction in 16th and payment of latecomers for 12" water in 16-th.=wi th some on-site_ ext.ens i on_ p.rcobabl y _ __ - required. - • /(.5 UC 10 1977 f ✓G p? ,. ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Finance Department ( Fire Department (-3 ' . . • 0 Library Department, 1 0 Park Department a. POlice Department Public Works Department I ' . Br Building Div . Trafic Engineering Div . I Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , (signed by resPenSible official or his designee) _ -c,•_(____-_,Cg114. . . . . . . . SUBJECT : Review of ECF- a(23-77 ; Application No . : 7- C(. 3 -77 A ct i On Name :___Au.$"Fik.) (?..,0 . - --/1Apk-- , Please review the ',attached . Review requested by ( date) : REVIEW BY OTHER ! CITY DEPARTMENTS : . , Department : • &___,-C Ccz:, , . Comments : ,,-,.. „ _,..e_... .„1/,‘c...-.1.-#.-7-___,r.... w.-.7.4', • . • , • . . . I 1 • , . • ' . , ! . -5- -7? Signatu of Director or Authorized Representative -bate 1 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : i 1 Department :rT_tabLc- Comments : I . , . , I . , i 1 c- --- -- --- --A-""--- -r--------L-77' ' a-z3.77-i7 Signature of Dire' o or Aqthorized Pepretive Date , . . .!' 1 , ( OVER. ) . , ; . 1 . , . , N kLY | / \� S / /)TH! |� i [ lY OEP�ARTN[0T5 : / - ' ' — '�--' '---------' ---- i . � �DOp8ptNCnt �__________ � | | Comments � � � ` ` | | | � ! � | | / -- r�ct�r Or �Ut�Ori �8d R8pr88 � nt�z� ve ~--- Date � ' x"" ^�r8 " ' � ' - r � ' \ | . | --------------------r--------- ���� ` ' . ! REVIEW BY OTHER � l�Y DEPARTMENTS : . AM / /��~�^����� D2pdrtme�t! �~` �v��' COmmen s- ^ - NO S tG41 FxC^mN *wv��' � � ^ / ! � | ' ^ ---------'--Siciriatur8 GCtO thOri zSd ReDr8 �i Ve -- Date � ' | | | i | REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : � Department : | | Comments : / i ! / ' ! | , i � � -- --- -----'-- ---- i-v c----`-- Uote) � -- SignatU of ' 13Y OTHi �'� DEPARTMENTS | � '~ ' ! D8pa; len t � / [0 rilmE�.Vt5 � . ' . / ! ' \ / | � ' ! ' � � . � ! ! i ---�\-`e o f Di ------------ --ot�l--�� r I i " / . � / | ` � PROPOSED/FINAL ._CLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE, ,.JN-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SP-063-77 ❑ PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-263-77 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Fill and grade a 10. 3 acre site with an existing elevation of 20 feet ± to an elevation of 23 feet ± . Proponent The Austin Company Location of Proposal Southwest corner of S . W. 16th St. and Lind Ave . S . W . Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to 0 have ❑ not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ❑ is is . not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma-de after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . negative Reasons for /declaration of environmental significance : 1 . Proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning for the site and surrounding area . 2 . The subject " site is surrounded by existing filled land and is not designated as or adjacent to a wetland area , greenbelt or drainage channel . 3. This negative declaration is further based upon the provision of proper mitigating measures within the site development plan . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent of mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a� (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible tffic . al - --Gordon Y . ERicksen. Title Plan . g / ire tar / Date August 22 , 1977 AIVWXAMVIMEMPF Signature /e( City of Renton Planning Department 5 -76 I - 'y• I I:I -I _ — �w / _ rl� W I Q _- s N Tl I rim I • 1 F J - I L _, ' _— . ► Ilu�1 I I 1 H- - -, -; ,-s pIIIIIIIIifilri i •ACFf� MR SIN III IIIIIII/� IIIIIIIIII N��I�e I -I i L �N NER' 4 •' i j 1110ll 1 illlp. 1 N oh Ili• I I\ 'I- �,G _�T� a�°Rj;A;? 0 i;�:gll_llNil ` ,:�i III I II �;� '�� ,� I,I i� �� f� — . •Ile II! y;,',.111 I I . III 1�n1 iL� e \ ��\ di 1IIIIIII ", 1 11il ° > III / _ �. 11 . .�I�! — •II• i IEIIssol j' L J�' _ I Oil° i1j� 111! '� 7� q I..I,. owl-. _ _ _"r /4 .,,f 12 1__- _.,4: •�J •-- 1 mak\I1\\\ l .„,,,,..„.."-•,,.:., firsoirvem : —'—' •r-qiii a' sTa FT, in:a•l_w, .:._ :,,:,7_ •1:.z.ip .11.12iiiiM iii'...',,,,,,,.,..., !. 12,4._.1 . 53 II , ` f L.I • — tip + �• • I .-i- N -) y / -- -1 f. f -- - - • `03 IThl `yu -:r.. :_ '�'-_�"�--••y--- ' �- 4- ---- 17-•� �';� �..... f r_I.1 .III �e- _._�7 � d . , ' .sc ..Via, --•i-M r -- _ �. J :- ' ZII �� '`t� 9,o St I_ 'r- i _ifirt_>_ -7- �W. -I __{��1 i (\l�j�� ± ;t- •• !or 16,r { - >• --.: _ - -., . - 1 - .— -1 .-- .... l \ JIi-.",i -.y .-_�_1.>. _•' T --1>1 i - - -.-_._ --_ /1 • 44 Ij ,et • 'i n — of .n • 7} :f Cd I1 _ E, ,. If I 1 . rfe Z, z. ru1 \ . Ilc a ,_ nl • • l M I -! ! A u-n ac _`,, I I11 I ' ,, SPECIAL PERMIT : I THE AUSTIN COMPANY ; Appl . No . SP-063-77 ; Special lermit to fill and grade ; property located on the south side of S . W. 16th Street between F Lind Avenue S .,W. and Raymond Avenue S . W. . I APPLICANT , THE AUSTIN COMPANY TOTAL AREA ± 10. 3 Acres , PRINCIPAL ACCESS S . W. 16th Street EXISTING ZONING H-1 EXISTING USE Undeveloped Filling and grading for future commjercial and PROPOSED USE industrial development . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN M-P (Manufac:turin Park ) I COMMENTS •' • , ,. I • a-re• Arc may 445* - .• Cr, •••-6.040, . • i� 2 - - - - 1 -- - - -r. 1 { Nt Q a AI � _ _ h ►N a IZ+.--+�--� a ® _ - _ -�+N� T G-(o000 . . w /614. sr I I I II I I ' / %// %%/% /% % /%/,.%�/%/%//%//%/ , __ 1 _ _ - _J " ,/,`",) .;:rY.Z/ / 'd ' /.. /7 ' ilti ill" '.ei/ h i�i��,1429(174" --"7:- ----/ # ' 91%7 /441frv /,;/ /, /%%/%/ /. ko: 5- itropolv.0_ 1 _ -_ _ - ' / x ��//4� ,,,//�,/� ���/%/��� _ _ _1_ _ _ ....4 ....1_ _ r -- - - 1 ,/ . 4 /%% %� /// -- - -- i - - - T - - - - -, I .. w it - - �+ .I. "1 k E- --' I-1 1.4..- .,...1 ,r _ _ .-' ....!_ _ _. • - — - - -J L - - - I- - - - - _. �.f: ,. - - - - - -a -- _ _. l- - - - -..1 L - --- -- - a. 1 .y:- - _ - - _ ..-I_ -- _. • L.-- ... .,.I L - - - I-- - _ 7.. J.O ,-..1 i r +. �_ - _ __ I L. - - - - -�� L - _ _-1... _ _ -I i I-- - ,. - --1 -- -- - _4 - - - : F- e,, c71i4 , 1 I • rsCAi g /11= Z00 f Oi f S'rE ' , I ' .r . . /NE. Aln! +FAw1 Sp6cIA - 7ES.Mir:, Z(0. 5p. 043..77 , I pF 11/ 41354 o THE CITY OF RENTON Z v AI = o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 S CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR o PLANNING DEPARTMENT O 235-2550 ��� 4tFO SEP�� August 16 , 1977 George Wannamaker King County Division of Hydraulics Room 976 King County Administration Building Seattle , Washington 98104 Dear Mr. Wannamaker : RE : GARY MERLINO , SPECIAL PERMIT NO . SP-062-77 AUSTIN COMPANY , SPECIAL PERMIT NO . SP-063-77 Attached for your review and comments are two special permit applications for fill and grade recently submit- ted to this department. These projects are located in the portion of Renton within the Green River Valley . floodplain . We would appreciate any comments you have regarding these applications prior to the August 30 , 1977 , Land Use Hearing Examiner public hearing date. If you have any further questions , please contact this department. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Plan/ing-,; Director/7 NGi c h a`� Smith ,�� Associate Planner MLS :wr Attachments +' -� l0TED_DEP8,.. ,_ ,TAL REVIEW REvUEST _ _ _ ` � TO : _ � ' pill `| �� E� UlVl-SIO P ' FIRE DEPARTMENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT ' � | 'FR0M� PLAN-N�-NG DEPARTMENT ( / Contact Per5'On RE: 7s V \ '`---~' ` --------- '---- -- | Please review the attached information regarding the subject | prnpO3d7 and return it to the Planning DepOrtment by | IS /7 ' with y0Vr written recommendation . Your re-sponse will be included as part Of 'the | staff report to the Hearing Examiner. � / Thank you , - | PLANNING DEPARTMENT | | — — | | Date ./ �/ . 7~J` | / , / ` / ] / / | / \ \ / � ` INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date August 10, 1977 TO: Planning Department FROM: Engineering SUBJECT: The Austin Company Special Permit, Fill and Grade This division will require an approved temporary sedimentation and detention pond with a designed restrictor, until such time that construction is com- pleted and the approved permanent drainage facilities are operational . The Austin Company will be required to maintain dust control on the side streets and the site during all phases of construction. Curbs, gutters and sidewalks will be required at the time property is developed. Ultimate development will require sewer construction in 16th and payment of latecomers for 12" water in 16th with some on-site extension probably required. _ C� REala 9„ AUG 10 1917 fi ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ; FORMS TO : Finance Department Fire Department i Library Department ' Park Department Police Department • Public Works Department Building Div. Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . Jti sties Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) _____4(4(zaaa.c-LAAJ . A l lion No . : Sc— f�3 --77 SUBJECT : Review of ECF-_��-77 ; pPica�_ Action Name :__ Au$T (5D _.____.... >. ..C.1•4,4;_____Fll,U_T__42.1e-_.._L__(-1..U- f6T11&c'r" Please review the 'attached . Review requested by , ( date)': ' �� ,7? i , i REVIEW BY OTHER ' CIITY DEPARTMENTS : ' I t-'; , Department : C�- 1 , i , i Comments : ��-� .��� �,c..„.- - '-' c ---: _ Sign o'f Di (-5------)? rector or Authorized Repr'espntati ve Date-- - REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Depalrtment : --r to ..L G.!?d , � .A.t.�------- Comments : i 1 1 , l Sicgnature of Dire m or Authorized Repre ;'��t i;��•ti ve Date 1i • N i ( o yr is IZ ) \ H ' \ 1 ! I it z l, I +il. , +., i 1 'r' DL PARTMENTS : Department : — Comments : • • • • Signature of Director or Authorized Represe;ntat,i ve Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : mane 111 rY Comments : • • T-2?-77 Signature of Di recto or Authorized Represr ntati ve Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • Department : . • Comments : , • • • • I i Si gnat.ut e of Director or Authorized Repro c..,+1 -. :11 i v :, Date I • OTiIL CITY DEPARTMENTS : Depar ent : Comments : I I ' `9 . r1,-1 ,1 .I.Ire of Director or Author? zcl ttl. ,1 • �� ... 1 • j i B ParY , , / 1 BEGINNING OF FILE IFILE TITLE SPCCIAL PERMIT SP - OCoCo — 77 , RDDI1'iUN OF ONE 50> 000 BRA Srol:AGC TANK •M081L OIL CORPOPATION 8�8 I77 M1 API Publ. 2519 Second Edition Price: $3.00 • Use of Internal Floating Covers and Covered Floating Roofs to Reduce Evaporation- Loss For general information only. This is not an API Standard. • Non-Departmental/Industry Affairs. American Petroleum Institute • 2101 L Street, Northwest Washington, D.C. 20037 • • 11) A • • 'r', • • • The American Petroleum Institute takes no position as to whether any method, apparatus or product mentioned herein is covered by an existing patent, nor as to the validity of any patent alleged to cover any such method. Furthermore, the information contained in this bulletin does not grant the right, by implication or otherwise, for manufacture, sale or use in connection with any method, apparatus or product covered by letters patent; nor does it insure anyone against liability for infringement of letters patent. This publication may be used by anyone desiring to do so, but the American Petroleum Institute shall not be held responsible or liable in any way either for loss or damage resulting therefrom, or for the violation of any Federal, state or municipal regulations with which it may conflict. • • • • • • ;Copyright ° 1976 American Petroleum Institute Printed in the United States of America CONTENTS Page 0. Introduction 1 1. Scope 1 2. Field of application 1 3. Evaporation loss 2 4. Operating considerations 3 5. Cost Effectiveness 3 116.1 Annex A • 4 • I • • Us • e of Internal Floating Covers and Covered Floating Roofs to Reduce Evaporation Loss • 0. INTRODUCTION The majority of the tanks in use in the petroleum This publication has been prepared by the American in- dustry are the fixed-roof type.Considerable progress Petroleum Institute's Committee on Petroleum hes been made over the years in controlling evapora-- Measurement through its Committee on Evaporation - tion, but breathing and filling losses from fixed-roof Loss Measurement to provide information on the use tanksstill are of significantmagnitude in tanks con- of floating covers and steel pans as a economical taining volatile sttocockss. and effective conservation method to reduce Reduction of evaporation loss conserves a valuable evaporation loss from volatile hydrocarbons stored natural resource and in many instances it is necess- in fixed-roof tanks. ary to provide a storage system which complys with emission control requirements for stationary - ("1 Since current designs reflect continuing improve- sources. ment and development, several questions still re- main regarding operating life and effectiveness The apparatus used to achieve the loss reduction under a wide range of conditions. A user should may be: recognize that there are differences in designs and should evaluate each design for the specific applica- a) Any one of several nonferrous covers of proprie- tion. Additional testing is under way or'planned, and tary design made for installation in a fixed-roof tank, as more conclusive results become available, a and defined as internal floating covers. This type of revised edition of this publication will be issued. system will be designated herein as floating covers. Steel pans were first developed and installed over 50 , b) A pan-type steel floating roof designed in accor- years ago for open-top tank use. Replaced by more dance with Appendix H of API Standard 650, Welded stable pontoon designs, they found reapplication Steel Tanks for Oil Storage, and installed in a fixed- under the protection of fixed-roof tanks around 1950. roof tank. This system is defined as a covered float- Floating covers were developed about 1955. Since ing roof,and will be designated herein as a steel pan. the introduction of floating systems for closed tanks, considerable improvement has,been made in con- 2. FIELD OF APPLICATION struction and design. At the present time, at least 10 U.S. manufacturers offer one of the closed tank Either floating covers or steel pans may be used in • systems on the commercial market.-To date, approx- fixed-roof tanks in volatile product service. They are imately 5,000 floating covers and steel pans have'h available in virtually all commercial sizes for vertical been installed in liquid storage tanks in the United fixed-roof tanks. Available diameters currently range • States. • from about 300 feet to 20 feet, and with slight • 1. SCOPE modification, down to 8 feet. Methods and materials . have been developed to properly seal the annular This publication describes the' methods used to space between the tank shell and the rim plate, as reduce evaporation loss from a free liquid surface in well as sealing around any number of verticals such a fixed proof tank by separating the liquid and vapor as roof support columns, internal ladders and gaging regions, and summarizes the characteristics and .tubes. performance of floating covers and steel pans. A recommended method for evaluating evaporation Several types of floating covers and steel pans are loss reduction for either type is also included. available. Through experience and continuing 'pro- t • 2 American Petroleum Institute eiN duct development, most of the early designs have g) Manways to permit inspection and maintenance. been replaced with improved models. The variety of covers and pans described below and shown in An- In addition, circulation vents and an open vent at the nex A indicate the wide range available. high point of the fixed roof must be provided to minimize the possibility of hydrocarbons accumulat- These include: ing to concentrations approaching the flammable range. Appendix H of API Standard 650 specifies use a) Aluminum deck on an aluminum grid framework of at least four circulation vents, not more than 32 supported above the liquid- surface by tubular feet apart,with a total open area of at least 0.2 square aluminum pontoons. feet per foot of tank diameter,'plus a high point vent •b) Aluminumpanel• deck on an aluminumgrid fra- with at least 50 square inches of open area. All tanks •with floating covers or steel pans must have this mework supported above the liquid surface by venting capacity. aluminum floats with polyurethane foam. c) Aluminum sandwich panels with a honeycombed Other design features that are usually available, but aluminum core floating in contact with the liquid. generally must be specifically requested by the purchaser, include floating suction guides, tank d) Sandwich panels consisting of foam enclosed in overflow openings, internal ladders and gaging fiberglass-reinforced polyester skin, floating in con- tubes, fill inlet diffusers, adjustable support legs, tact with the liquid. cover walkways, and tank gage guides and wells. e) A pan-type steel roof floating in contact with the Some modification to tank internals is usually liquid and designed according to Appendix H, API necessary, but the need generally becomes apparent Standard 650. only after a tank is cleaned and inspected.This work could include plumbing vertical columns and lad- The basic design concept is to reduce the liquid sur- ders, removing column lateral bracing and installing face exposed to evaporation to a minimum by resting reinforcing, correcting tank shell deformation, ellk a floating device on the product, or by confining a removing shell obstructions and miscellaneous pip- layer of saturated vapor under a tight cover floating ing. on the liquid. The loss of vapor otherwise displaced during filling a fixed-roof tank is virtually eliminated, 3. EVAPORATION LOSS so that losses sustained during filling and with- drawal from a tank with a floating cover or steel pan The results of tests of early designs of floating covers are negligible. Some evaporation does occur from and steel pans were contained in the appendix to the the annular space between the rim plate and the tank November 1962 edition of this publication. The shell. results were quantitative and indicative of the state of the art at that time. Each type may incorporate one or more of the follow- ing: Reductions in vapor loss ranged from 47 to 94 per- cent. The reason for the wide efficiency range can a) Flexible, product-resistant perimeter seals or probably be traced to conditions under which the wipers that permit the device to move freely up and tests were conducted, the methods used and the down in the tank without lodging on rivet or bolt types available at that stage of development. heads, lapped weld joints or shell irregularities. Limited test results with some current designs,based b) Antirotational devices that keep the sampling and primarily on stock records, indicate average vapor gaging openings of the cover in alignment with loss reductions exceeding 90 percent of the amount those in the tank roof, and prevent contact with verti- that would have occurred in a fixed-roof tank. Long • cal appurtenances. term data to substantiate vapor-loss reduction using newer designs is now being accumulated. c) Suitable gaging and sampling openings to permit manual gaging and sampling operations. Until long term data is available, it is suggested that the theoretical evaporation loss for both a floating d) Venting devices. cover and a steel pan be calculated by procedures eiN described in API Bulletin 2517, Evaporation Loss e) Legs or hangers for support at low liquid level. From Floating-Roof Tanks, using the minimum average wind velocity of four mph and a multiplying f) Anti-static bonding devices. factor for a pan roof with a single modern seal. With • • Use of Internal Floating Covers and Covered Floating Roofs to Reduce Evaporation Loss 3 rrNi seals in good condition, estimated evaporation Certain other operational precautions should be ob- losses so computed should parallel the accuracy served. A floating cover or steel pan can be severely range described in Bulletin 2517. damaged if the tank is overfilled, forcing the device into the roof support members. The former maximum 4. OPERATING CONSIDERATIONS fill capacity therefore must be slightly reduced after floating covers or steel pans have been installed.Ac- Tests have been conducted, and some are still in cess for tank bottom cleaning or repair may be ham- progress, to determine seal effectiveness, hydrocar- pered unless the cover is supported at a suitable bon vapor concentration and specific mechanical height above the tank bottom. Adjustable supports performance. are available for this purpose.'Rapid withdrawals or high filling rates at low tank levels may cause Nonmetallic seals are generally used for floating mechanical damage. Protection against damage by covers and steel pans. A coated fabric filled with mechanical mixers must be provided by special resilient open-cell urethane-foam or a closed-cell• guards. At low tank levels, jet mixers must be oper ated at low speeds. No mixer should operate when elastomeric wiper are the most common types. Material can be supplied to accommodate the full the floating cover or steel pan is resting on supports. range of hydrocarbons, alcohols and many special products under most climatic conditions. Long term Individual designs must be evaluated to avoid durability characteristic of the various types will be difficulties from turbulence, air slugs and boiling. considered as part of the evaporation loss study now Product boiling considerations limit application of under way.Additional information is also available in the systems to volatile stocks with a true vapor pres- ' Bulletin 2517. sure at storage conditions somewhat below at- mospheric pressure. Some users and regulatory On initial fill, and subsequent refills involving a agencies provide a safety margin by specifying 11 Asia as the upper limit of product true vapor pressure vapor space beneath a floating cover or steel pan, a for floating covers or steel pans. Manufacturers must flammable mixture can occur in the vapor space above the device in tanks with vent openings (see be consulted on service requirements to ensure suitability Appendix H, API Standard 650) for as long as 12 to specific designs and compatability of 24 hours. Since vapor is heavier than air, stratifica- tion of hydrocarbons will occur, with concentrations Filling and emptying rates must also be considered, decreasing rapidly as the distance above the floating and velocity diffusers and proper venting furnished cover or steel pan increases. for maximum operating conditions. On working tanks storing hydrocarbons, selected 5. COST EFFECTIVENESS tests on some current designs with venting (see Ap- pendix H, API Standard 650) normally indicate vapor It appears that a new fixed-roof tank with either a concentrations below the lower flammable limit in floating cover or a steel pan is often highly competi- the vapor space above the device. However, the con- tive in first cost with a new open top floating-roof dition of the floating cover or steel pan,the effective- tank, depending on diameter. ness of the seals,the wind velocity and the operating mode of the tank at the time will all affect vapor con- To determine the economic justification for installing centration. a floating cover or steel pan in a fixed-roof tank, it is suggested that the theoretical evaporation loss for Recognizing the potentiality of a flammable mixture the specific tank first be calculated by established within the vapor space above the cover, it is recom- methods described in API Bulletin 2518, Evaporation mended that a gage top be grounded to the fixed- Loss from Fixed-Roof Tanks. The modified method roof gage hatch before opening the hatch cover and described in Bulletin 2517 under Evaporation Loss, be kept in contact with the hatch rim while lowering may be used to estimate evaporation loss with a the tape into the tank to prevent the occurrence of floating'cover or steel pan. The loss reduction may electrostatic arcing. then be used to establish potential savings. • w 4 American Petroleum Institute ANNEX A • f • TYPICAL SECTIONS • TYPE FLOATATION & PERIMETER SEALS ELASTOMER WIPER-SEAL OR FOAM-FILLEDU COATED FABRIC SEAL a) I—' v PONTOON DECK VA FOAM-FILLED COATED FABRIC l c) v TT i BUOYANT PANEL • • , . / ' > . FOAM-FILLED COATED FABRIC • • . . e) v / • 1 e- \ . TANK SHELL STEEL PAN • ERRATA SHEET - 2519 • Page 1, column 1, fifth line from bottom has a registered trademark symbol instead of a hyphen in fixed-roof. • • • • • • �w•.r:S—°.r.: '"� :}•:�- ',ir.. �•..� j• ti; , .'• ..' ,.!�k .� ., ,.,+;• ,�,,"'...:.,. yd•: f ' ,�?. - _.' 7—`•�. aiz. r i1't .r.n..Y.•,S.,C'.�it 'Y '$46, •N% •S . ::�'a " *.• "��nr "�'+y+-`5 r!:—;r_r - '.. ,_e, 'vk;'�'1+„a,;;``.; . �,.�,.,:. ..r�.Cty'u3•;>;'s..�k' ' �Lf+r;iii �'*+�!�'�►;S'' .ti,,,.�,; ;�'; ,is ,"+- • •• _A".�' 4'::�?ti: •F:,,,, .•r—:..•. �J ..,a .L�• .•';�► oi `h.. �. S''• 41,R,i r • w' r:: 't 'y - � - :7"��:w.' �,.•�w.:-Y rf . •`�� Qw b•::+1.'R:,y ..�.i r. • • � - it � n.w�' .. - � .. .,i' �� •i.. '1 •s t..... . �u . .x ,rt „'ri S:pt r..<��p,••'::d'•�•�.;p: ;1';;,•,.,.,,' . ,..R:. , ).;w.;,i`.• ,. .�.' 1 Jr`' +,: �:'c,�'s.,.' s• ::x„ e.. •i� ro.ti�.i'.�''t.r°�r�•r'��s.�,;rL;.;a�", .LM tib.,. ' k^a,. a Pd. e,�,' 4 ✓ ) a • • • :4 r. ,•)t s y,. �' R;• ':e$,: •:_ •,�"# + •'•i. c x'ar' r • •'l • ,•, • �:. Iw.r- ,: �, J " f•. ` .fro.,� •` .rK^,�•."•'.: `. \ - API Bull. 2517 i - I .` February 1962 / PE • API BULLETIN . .• • ON . EVAPORATION LOSS FROM FLOATING—ROOF TANKS - - - Prepared by the Evaporation Loss Committee of the American Petroleum Institute - _ 1 •1 For general information only. _ - • This is not an API Standard. ' • t� • 0� "fit, - - _ _ - _ . • 1041 V 00 . . AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE - - . - ' . - Division of Technical Services 1271 Avenue of the Americas - New York 20, N. Y. _ Price $1.00. -� !•; : : f c titute takes noposition as to whether anymethod, . - The American Petroleum Ins _ apparatus, or product mentioned herein is covered by an existing patent, nor as to - - • the validity of any patent alleged to cover any such method. Furthermore, the information contained in this bulletin does not grant the right, by implication or , otherwise, for manufacture,,,sale,or,use in connection with any method, apparatus, or product covered by letters patent; nor does it insure anyone against liability for infringement of letters patent. - _ This bulletin may be used by anyone desiring to do so, but-the American Pe- troleum Institute shall not be held responsible or liable in any way either for loss or damage resulting therefrom,or for the violation of any federal,state,or municipal - regulations with which it may conflict. : - 1 • ( • - - • �; t - \ ( • • • • • • - ABSTRACT A method for estimating standing-storage and withdrawal evaporation losses . from floating-roof tanks containing crude oil or gasoline has been developed by the - Evaporation Loss Committee of the American Petroleum Institute. Actual field test•data p_ovided the basis for the standing-storage loss correlation; laboratory test data, which determined the adhesion of gasoline to steel surfaces in several • stages of corrosion,provided the basis for the withdrawal loss equation. The correlation establishes the factors necessary to predict the loss under many - possible combinations of tank and floating-roof construction, type of roof seal, and . _ color of tank paint. The correlation is applicable over the ranges of 2-psia to • 11-psis true vapor pressure (TVP), 4-mph to 16-mph average wind velocity, and - - 20-ft-to 200-ft-diameter tanks. The accuracy of this method of loss estimation has - •• not been determined for higher vapor pressures or for tanks of larger diameters. Floating-roof seals of the metallic and nonmetallic types are described. The - manner•in which evaporation loss occurs from the seal area of a floating roof is - discussed and guidance for the selection, maintenance, and replacement of the • • seal is presented. - _ • • • ( • • • • • • • - - • INTRODUCTION - The American Petroleum Institute sponsored a symposium on evaporation Ioss at the Thirty-second Annual Meeting in 1952. The symposium papers presented . average figures for standing-storage loss from floating-roof tanks expressed as barrels per foot of diameter per; year per.pound of true vapor pressure. Wide - variation in the data was noted and further effort on correlating test results was • recommended. Losses from butt-welded tanks with close-fitting seals also required . ' additional consideration. . - The API Evaporation Loss Committee, in 1957, collected from the petroleum . industry both new and previously obtained data on evaporation loss from floating- roof tanks. An intensive study was made of these data. As a result of this study, the effect of an additional,variable, wind velocity, was determined and the earlier _ variables were defined more precisely resulting in a significant reduction in the ( spread of data for the 'various types of floating-roof tanks. This bulletin presents the resultant correlations for use in estimating evaporation loss. 'To supplement the general description of equipment covered in API Bulletin .• 2513: Evaporation Loss in the Petroleum Industry—Causes and Control, informa- tion is presented herein which deals with the vital seal portion of the floating roof. - In addition to the metallic-shoe type of seal, the nonmetallic seal is discussed and a comparison is made of the features of each. . . A guide to the selection, maintenance, and replacement of the floating-roof - - seal—based on -manufacturers' publications, users' experience, and tests—is in- - eluded in this bulletin. • *"Symposium on Evaporation Loss;"Proc. API 32 DJ 213-81 (1952). • • . • is - • • • _ CONTENTS PAGE CHAPTER 1—LOSS CALCULATION SUMMARY 7 • - - • A. Method 7 B. Sample Calculation 0 7 • CHAPTER 2—DESCRIPTION OF ROOFS AND SEALS 12 A. Floating-Roof Decks 12 • B. Floating-Roof Seals • ... .. : '12 • C. Metallic Seals 12 • - D. Nonmetallic Seals 13 CHAPTER 3--DETAILS OF LOSS ANALYSIS 14 A. Mechanism of Loss _ • - - 14 B. Standing-Storage Loss Data -• 14 • C. Loss Correlation and Estimation 14 - • •D. Significance of Variables 16 : ' . E. Withdrawal Loss 16 F. Use of Results • 16 G. Maintenance and Operation to Minimize Losses 17 H. Miscellaneous Benefits -17 - CHAPTER 4—GUIDE TO SFi.FCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ( SEALS 17 A. Guide to Selection—Metallic Vs. Nonmetallic 17 B. Guide to Maintenance and Replacement 18 CONCLUSION • 18 • APPENDIX I--SUMMARY OF DATA FOR RIVETED TANKS WITH PAN ROOFS 19 • APPENDIX II—SUMMARY OF DATA FOR RIVETED TANKS WITH • . PONTOON ROOFS - - • - ' 20 APPENDIX III—SUMMARY OF DATA FOR `MELDED TANKS WITH PONTOON ROOFS 21 • • APPENDIX IV—GRAPH OF FLOATING-ROOF STANDING-STOR- " .AGE LOSS EQUATION _ 22 _ • APPENDIX V—COMMI it trh. MEMBERSHIP 23 l . • • 5 . •• EVAPORATION LOSS FROM FLOATING-ROOF TANKS CIIAPTER 1—LOSS CALCULATION SU:1LML•ARY A. Method is painted aluminum color. The average wind velocity _ at the tank site is 10 mph. Standing-storage loss is determined from Fig. 1. The • calculated loss is the product of the loss factor, Lt, • - - Obtained from the graph in Fig. 1(B), and the,multi- Solution: plying factor, obtained from the table* in Fig. 1(A). . To determine evaporation loss by this method i is With a straight edge enter Fig. 2, "Vapor Pressures necessary to know the following factors: of Gasolines and Finished Petroleum Products," at 1'. Type of product stored—gasoline or crude oil. 52 F temperature, go to the 13 lb RVP with a slope factor curve S of 3 and read the true vapor pressure • 2. Reid vapor pressure of the stored product. line, 6 psia. (Fig. 3 is a similar vapor pressure chart 3. Average temperature of the stored product. for crude oil.) With the true vapor pressure deter- . Tank diameter and construction—welded or riveted. mined, enter Fig. 1(B) at 6 TVP, move vertically to intersect the 10-mph wind velocity line, horizontally •5:Color of tank paint. • , to the line representing a 120-ft-diameter tank, and 6. Type of floating roof—pan or pontoon. vertically down to the base line to a loss factor, Lt, of 7. Type of roof seal and condition of the seal. 225. Select from the table in Fig. 1(A) the multiplying factor to apply to the 225 value in order to adjust to 8—Average wind velocity of the area. the specific conditions of the investigation. The factor for a welded tank painted light gray or aluminum, with B. Sample Calculation a pontoon type of floating roof and a seal of the older �' Problem: - type,is 1.33 for gasoline storage.The adjusted standing- storage Ioss is 225 times 1.33 or 300 bbl per year. Estimate the evaporation loss to be expected from a The factor adopted for the nonmetallic seal is the welded, floating-roof tank 120 ft in diameter, storing same as for the modern type of double seal shown in 13=1b-RVP gasoline at an average storage temperature the table in Fig. 1(A). - - of 52 F (no ASTM distillation curve given). The tank If the floating-roof seal for a tank is defective, losses • has a pontoon type of floating roof with an older version will be much higher than predicted by this correlation. - (looser fitting) metal seal (good condition). The tank Chapter 4, "Guide to Selection and Maintenance of Seals," discusses the importance of proper maintenance •Losses during withdrawal essentially are negligible except, and affixes approximate values to losses as demon- • for gunite-lined tanks. A method for estimating withdrawal loss is presented in Chapter 3;Par. E. _ strated in Iaboratory equipment. • ( - 7 5 • �1 /+� • ' i , 00 • • • - FIG. !-Stnnding-Storngo Evaporation Lose front Floating•Aoof Tanks. • • ' L, (loss In barrels per year) 4 Li (loss factor from graph) limes multiplying factor (from table). . (A) o w - -WELDED TANKS- - - RIVETED TANKS - �- • x MULTIPLYING PAN OR PONTOON ROOF PAN ROOF PONTOON ROOF FACTORS O To SINGLE OR DOUBLE SEAL SINGLE SEAL DOUBLE SEAL SINGLE SEAL DOUBLE SEAL N APPLY TO `'� MODERN OLD® MODERN OLD• MODERN OLD• MODERN OLD. MODERN OLD• 0 Lf ♦ 7 TANK • •TANK TANK TANK TANK TANK TANK TANK TANK TANK PAINT•• PAINT PAINT PAINT PAINT _ PAINT PAINT _ PAINT PAINT PAINT Cam' LT. LT. • LT. LT. LT. LT. LT. LT. LT. LT. O GREY WHITE GREY WHITE GREY WHITE GREY WHITE GREY. WHITE GREY WHITE GREY WHITE GREY WHITE GREY WHITE GREY WHITE GASOLINE 1.0 - .90 1.33 1.20 3.2 2.9 4.2 3.0 2.8 '2.5 3.8 . 3.4 2.8 2.5 3.0 3.4 2.5 2.2 3,3 3.0 _ O CRUDE OIL .75 .68 1.0 .90 2.4 2.2 3.1 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.0 '2.5 2.1 1.9 2.B• 2.5 1.9 1.7 2.5 2.2 0 • • • • SEALS INSTALLED PRIOR TO 1942 ARE CLASSED AS OLD SEALS • . •• ALUMINUM PAINT IS CONSIDERED LIGHT GRAY.IN LOSS ESTIMATION • ' • ' - . . ' . - r • • • (B) • \ • . FOR AVERAGE.WIND VELOCITY i 16 REFER TO API BULLETIN • 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 • 2513, EVAPORATION LOSS IN • • THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY.. . 14 CAUSES AND CONTROL,OR LOCAL WEATHER BUREAU DATA 12 .7� • 1 • ��ia I 10 r ' I �A y ��i/ Vl _ __ __ . • r N • 11. _ _ `�C_� 1JVi4iF/ID A �A�Q • r • a. rosr — a IP :"..1 . . • • cn • A / ' FOR TANKS LARGER THAN 1501 I DIAMETER, MULTIPLY LOSS FOR • • 150T DIAMETER TANK BY RATIO F- OF TANK D1AM• 150 • • • . • • J/ • • _• �+� ' I 1 Ti _, 1 1 1 1 1 1, 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 . 3 2 1 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 , • • TRUE VAPOR PRESSURE PSIA • LOSS FACTOR, 14 (SEE FIGURE 2 OR 3) (MULTIPLY BY VALUE FROM TABLE TO OBTAIN ADJUSTED tOSS) . %D ' . • . ' i in • lb'. -• )RATIOS1 Loss FROM FLOATING-ROOF VKS - 0.20 ,( • • - 0.30 - • - - 1207 • - 0.40 - r y - • 0.50 = r- - .5 - 1 I O•--- - - 0.60 3a1 0 _ _ .- • • _- 0.70 . 4, • . - • . • -- .80 •• 100- - - -• 0.90 1 - .• = W --- 1.00 - _' - _ _, ;- ._ _ _ Q - 1.50 E 2 - - - 80�- u IZ. ' 4 01 . W . •00 `I' cc ` a • Q - • 70-- `N tL' co _ 2.50 1011 I' 6 a > W W • _ 3.00 ��'/ 8 _c • I 2 a • W • z - 3.50. • �I/� 10 - cc. • W c, _ 4.00 ' - ill - ( a ill 12 so Q Z = iid/ 14 _ , - w 5.00 P 16 -4.1 a - 20 -F 301 • . _ _ a 7.00 - a. - 8.00' > W - 20 _ D ._ 9.00 S = SLOPE OF THE ASTM DISTILLATION CURVE AT mo- 10.0 10 PER CENT EVAPORATED = y' I - - - I1.0 DEG F AT IS PER CENT MINUS DEG F AT 5 PER CENT 107 _ - - 12.0 - 10 IN THE ABSENCE OF DISTILLATION DATA THE FOLLOW- 03 - _- 14.0 ING AVERAGg VALUE OF 3 MAY BE USED : - - 15.0 MOTOR GASOLINE 3 - 16.0 AVIATION GASOLINE 2 _ - 17.0 LIGHT NAPHTHA (9-14'LB RVP) 3.5 . - 18.0 NAPHTHA (2-8 LB RVP) 2.5 • - 19.0 . -- 20.0 ° 21.0 _ - 22.0 .. • - • - 23.0 2 4.0 . ( • Source: Nomograph drawn from data of the National Bureau of Standards. - . - _ FIG. 2-Vapor Presurei of Gasoline'and Finishcd Petroleum Products, 1 Lb to 20 Lb RVP. • TRUE VAPOR PRESSURE IN POUNDS PER-SQUARE INCH •ABSOLUTE 1 I I I I J i • i 1 1 I1J I HI I i 1 I, 1 111 I I I 1 I I I11111 I I I i 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1;I I I I I I 1 1 1 - . w 0 CP ;► W N -- O 'D CO •CP U A W N - • • • • REID VAPOR PRESSURE -: - n se a e r • r - O N p fJ� A W N H C G a 0 O ., O 0 • 0 0 0 0 0,,. 0 0 0 O O 0 IWI�I,llllll111111111lj�lllllllllilll111111I1111j(Jilhil111,1,li111i1111111►IIIIIlIl11111111I111111111I101111111,111►111I1►111;11d11111 . . .• • . , TEMPERATURE, IN DEGREES ..FAHRENHEIT • , ... • . . • CHAPTER DESCRIPTION OF ROOFS AND SEALS • The floating-roof tank, compared with an htmos- days of floating-roof development. Thus, there has pheric pressure tank, achieves a high percent reduction . been a great deal of favorable experience with them, of evaporation Ioss because the roof floats upon the and during this period of use they have been highly product and the air space in contact with the volatile refined. Modern metallic seals are rugged yet they ' stock is almost completely eliminated. exert only a slight pressure on the tank shell.•• , - The metallic seal is diagramed in Fig. 5. The identi- A. Floating-Roof Decks fying characteristic of this seal is that it utilizes a light. Floating roofs are of three general types: pan,pon- gage metal band as the sliding contact with the tank . shell. The band is formed of sheets (called shoes) toon, and double deck, see Fig. 4. Manufacturers sup- and may vary in dimension for the different mann- ply various versions of the basic types of roofs ,which facturers. Generally, the band is of galvanized steel are tailored to emphasize some particular feature such approximately 16 gage for butt-welded tanks,and about • as vapor trapping, full liquid contact, load carrying - in. thick for riveted tanks. Thus.the heavier shoes capacity, or roof stability. Details of the various classes _ - • of floating-roof'tanks are presented in API Bulletin 2513: Evaporation Loss in the Petroleum Industry— _ Causes and Control. - ' • Selection of a specific type of roof depends upon the r properties of the product to'be stored, particularly vapor pressure and corrosive nature, and the roof sta- - - bility required under service conditions. The least • costly pan-type roof is also the least stable and offers . .. the lust protection against product boiling. The more1 • • costly double-deck roof provides good stability as well - • z. as insulation to minimize the boiling of stored product. 4 Boling of product should be avoided because itlis the Pan Floating Roof . cause of excessive evaporation loss. _ - _ - B. Floating-Roof Seals • - . All classes of roofs provide an adequate annular rim space between the tank shell and the outer rim plate i. .l of the floating roof to permit installation and mainte- L�-- --' f�— TJ nance of the sealing mechanism. In order to obtain the full benefit of a floating roof . as a vapor conservation device the annular rim,space - _ must be fitted with a tight seal. A good seal closes this space effectively, yet permits normal roof movement while performing its main function of protection against evaporation loss. Tanks and foundations must be built Pontoon Floating Roof so that out-of-roundness, caused by faulty construction • or unequal settlement, does not exceed the capability - - of the seal to conform to the shell.. • The mechanism that provides the sealing force for H- today.most seals also serves to keep the roof centered iin the • tank. �n rirr:ri_Two general• types of seals are in prominent use M For purposes of description these seals have been classed as metallic and nonmetallid. A number - • of specific types of seals in each class are described herein. . C. Metallic Seals • . Double-Deck Floating Roof • Metallic seals,which have been in widespread use for FIG.4--General Types of Floaring.Iioof Tanks. man years, became the industry standard in the early _ • 12 • f ?. ESCRTPTION OF ROOFS AND SEALS 13 • for riveted tanks usually are made in shorter segments In normal use, metallic seals will give excellent serv- so that they will conform to the curvature of the tank ice. When used with a corrosive product, the metal shell. API Standard 650: Welded Steel Tanks for Oil parts usually are heavily galvanized or made of stainless I Srora;e specifics the minimum shoe thickness and the steel. It is not unusual for a seal to function dice- grade of Galvanizing for these shoes. The shoes are tively for 15 years. As a rule, the primary seal fabric joined together to form a complete ring. Provision is will begin to lose its life and show signs of aging before Imada for expansion and contraction of the ring as it the metal parts show wear. 'passes over shell irregularities, rivets, and the like. This . is accomplished by narrow pieces of fabric joined into D. Nonmetallic Seals Ithe ring or by crimping the shoes at intervals. The metal ring normally is from 3-ft to 4-ft deep and thus Nonmetallic seals are a relatively recent development . . Iprovides a potentially large contact area with ,the tank • in the search for more effective seals. They were used shell sparingly many years ago, but have come into promi- The rim space between the shoe,and the roof is nence in the past 5 to 10 years. The nonmetallic seal sealed by bolting or clamping a coated fabric from the is shown in Fig. 6. The identifying characteristic of this • ;shoes to the,rim plate of the roof. This is called the, seal is that it utilizes a coated-fabric band as the sliding - primary seal fabric. The specific type of fabric used contact with the tank shell. Liquid pressure, gas pres- . varies with the tank manufacturer and the type of sure, or resilient foam are used to prpvide the force service. Two methods are used for attaching the pri-, needed to expand the seal. against the tank shell. mary seal fabric. In the oldest and most commonly Nonmetallic seals have two major advantages: fled- , Sused method the fabric is attached to the top of the bility, and elimination of the annular vapor space. The hoe and the rim plate. In the reduced vapor space fabrics used are much more flexible than the steel shoes, method the fabric is attached to the shoe near the thus, there is better conformity fo the tank shell. The surface of the stored product. The two positions fort seals are placed in direct contact with the stored product the primary seal fabric are shown in Fig. 5. which prevents the occurrence of any vapor space in Metallic seals usually are designed to accommodate the tank and, consequently,.eliminates breathing loss. an increase or decrease of 5 in. in rim space. The shoe Because nonmetallic seals have less abrasive action than ring and mechanism ordinarily provide sufficient flexi metallic seals, the nonmetallic seals are recommended • bility so that a tight fit is obtained in small tanks, or where some types of internal coatings have been applied ' •'in tanks with moderate local irregularities. However,1 to the shell. - he seals may not be completely effective with severe Because the coated fabric makes rubbing contact with local.irregularities. ' *the tank shell, projections from the shell, such as rivet . Most metallic seal designs may be fitted with an heads or weld burrs, may cause wear and reduce the additional shell wiper at the top of the shoe ring. This service life. Sharp projections which might cut the is called a.secondary seal. This seal minimizes the effect fabric should be removed. Also, coated fabrics.in • of wind on any opening to the product surface. Sec-1 contact with petroleum products, especially those with ondary seals are desirable on riveted or lap-welded, high aromatic content, have been a source of trouble.tanks;the benefits for butt-welded tanks are slight The However, recent advances in synthetic compounding position of the secondary seal is shown in Fig. 5. I have resulted in fabrics with increased resistance to With some metallic seals,the shoes or spacing mecha- petroleum. Seal manufacturers can recommend the - - nism may not permit the tank to be filled to the top most suitable fabric for particular storage problems. • or permit the roof to descend to the bottom. The'', Most nonmetallic seals arc designed to accommodate travel limits imposed by a particular seal are available' an increase in rim space of 5 in. and a from the manufacturer. P decrease of 4 in. • j---Secondary Seal Optional • ,/-Wwlker Shield • 1 Primary Fabric Seal Tonto C1• V (location varies according WWI Tank �� to manufacturer) Shill—P- S.ol Conleiniwg t".... tpuid, n.o+ • Qoo1��0 ' Floating F.+1li.ef Mdwio{ k f • Roof Metallic seal �, • ( Note: Seal supports not shown. I ' Note Seal supports not shown. FIG.5—Metallic Seal. FIG. 6--Nonmetallic Seal. 1 14 (...._'ORATION Loss FROM FLOATING-RO01 __INKS - Because of the flexibility of the fabric, these seals prob- potential contact area as metallic seals. Any gap to the ably will conform to the contour of the tank shell 'even product surface may cause loss, and wind increases ( when fairly severe irregularities or•out-of-roundness are this loss. For this reason, nonmetallic seals are often encountered. Nonmetallic seals do not have as much• equipped with close-fitting weather shields. CHAPTER 3—DETAILS OF LOSS ANALYSIS - A. Mechanism of Loss in the Appendixes. Information solicited which did not The annular rim space between the tank shell and prove susceptible to correlation is not shown, i.e., tank the outer rim plate is the principal source of evaporation •environment, paint condition, outage, and weather dur- loss. Relatively small losses may occur at various points ing test. In some instances, the information was not l over the roof when adjustable length roof'suppoit and available. Gaps in wind velocity data were filled in by . exposed overflow pipes are present. consulting records of the nearest weather bureau station,. Two ways in which evaporation loss may occur in Meeting conventional accuracy.criteria, particularly the seal area of a floating-roof tank are: evaporation minimum loss specification,was not possible in the case between the seal and tank shell, and vapor permeation of the tests conducted on the welded tanks which, as a through the sealing fabric. • type, have a very low loss rate. Judgment, backed by • Loss between the seal and the tank shell may occur experience,was used to avoid discarding probably good by evaporation from exposed product surfaces or Ifrom data merely because the loss was low while retaining product wicking up the tank shell, or both. Product possibly bad data merely because the loss was not low. exposure may result from poor fitting' seals, or may Six tests (four of which were for butt-welded tanks) occur at shell irregularities, rivet beads, or antirotation which showed zero Ioss were accepted when no other bars. Vapors formed between the sealing ring and the reason existed for elimination. Study revealed that tank. shell must travel upward the depth of the seal these six tests were within the range of the probable to escape. Fora given gap, the deeper the sealing ring, overall experimental error; they averaged out 'some - high-loss tests conducted for comparable conditions. t;^.e more effective the seal in preventing loss: Wind Omission of these data would have presented an absurd increases this loss. Under the force of wind action, air Tests the space between the seal and the tank shell, trend in the correlation. on tanks having small sweeping out vapor at a rate which increases with the withdrawals were included, which is permissible when• wind velocity. :Laboratory tests have shown the loss the vapor pressure change method of loss measurement from wicking to be small. ' is employed. Vapor permeation through the sealing fabric is the cause of additional vapor loss. The magnitude of the Lose Correlation and Estimation loss depends upon the vapor permeability of the fabric. The test data were segregated into groups repiesent- For most fabrics used for floating-roof seals, this loss . ing the five types of tanks. Loss in barrels per year is relatively low. was plotted against different variables; this demon-, • strafed greater than direct proportionality to tank di B. Standing-Storage Loss Data I ameter and true vapor pressure, whereas wind velocity • •e bad a lesser effect- Outage and daily atmospheric ight companies provided data on 60 tests acceptable The true for correlation; 18 additional tests were'not used be- temperature variations showed no trend. cause of incomplete data orr nonrepresentative condi- vapor pressure was based on the average stock tem- tions, i.e., defective seals or large withdrawals. 'Fifty- perature, using Fig. 2 or 3 to convert from Reid vapor seven of the acceptable tests were run between 1933 pressure;it would be impractical to use the temperature and-19.2; one recent test involved a .15-ft-diameter in the seal zone. The three major variables in exponen • tial form were then related to the loss tank of old construction and two recent tests were --unit loss it conducted on a modern 145-ft-diameter tank. Two of the 60 tests were earl on crude oil stored in'white TABLE I—Distribution or 60 Acceptable Tests by, Type tanks. Fifty-eight tests were run on gasoline stored in of Construction . _ - tanks. 56 of which were painted in gray or aluminum. No.of Tank Type of • Loss was measured by the vapor pressure change Tests Shell - Roof Seal Paint Color - method in 57 tests, by the gaging method in 2 tests, 8 Riveted Pan Single White (3), gray (5) and by the gaging method' plus the density change 13 Riveted Pan Double Gray or aluminum ( method in 1 test. The distribution of tests byt e of 9 Riveted Pontoon Single Gray or aluminum YP 15 Riveted Pontoon Double Gray or aluminum tank is shown in Table 1. • 7 Welded Pontoon Single White (1). gray (6) Detailed test results by types of tanks arc.recorded 8 Welded Pontoon Double Gray or aluminum • - DETAILS OF 'LOSS ANALYSIS • 15 - • proportional to diameter to some power. Successive1•7. vs.D for differingvalues of k K cross plots were made, holding two of the three varia- p ` Liles constant, converging upon the exponent best'repre- V"o.T( 14.7—P) - ( senung the data. A re-examination produced no well- The comprehensive\ form of equation (1) may be solved cleaned additional variables. The resulting correlation by use of Fig. 1(A) and 1(B). based on tests on floating-roof tanks in good condition ! A seal factor k,-1.00 applies to metallic and non- is represented by equation (1) which includes three metallic seals of modem construction installed in either recommended modifying factors (k„k„k,). new tanks or in old tanks of riveted or welded con- e 0.1' I_,=KDt' struction (provided a good fit is obtained). A seal ` (14.7—P) Vo•:k,k�k" (1) factor k,=1.33 applies to loose-fitting seals typical of Where: those built prior to 1942. Two tests were made on a L,=standing-storage evaporation loss, in barrels per welded tank built in 1948; both tests had a loss rate - - . year. below 60 percent of the loss based on the other tests Kt=a tank-type factor which changes as follows: used in the correlation. However, the principal basis I Kt=0.045 for welded tank with pan or pontoon, for use of a lower loss factor for seals of newer con- roof, single or double seal. struction is the ability of the manufacturers to make a Kt=0.11 for riveted tank with pontoon roof,' tight seal. double seal. Standing-storage losses from crude oil arc estimated Kt=0.13 for riveted tank with pontoon roof,' to be 75 percent as great as from gasoline at comparable single seal. conditions. This conclusion is based on an analogy Kt=0.13 for riveted tank with pan roof, double, of the relative loss of crude oil versus gasoline stored seal. in atmospheric pressure tanks, inasmuch as the con- - - • Kt=0.14 for riveted tank with pan roof, single' trolling factors causing the difference (see API Bulletin seal. 2518: Evaporation Loss From Fixed-Roof Tanks) also exist in floating-roof tanks. The lower unit loss D=tank diameter, in feet.[For tanks 150 ft or rate for crude oil is confirmed directionally by the two less in diameter, use D1•J; for tanks larger crude oil tests which, fortunately, were conducted in a D 90-ft- and a 95-ft-diameter riveted-pan tank, thus • than 150 ft in diameter, use 150`s (--.150)1 1 eliminating diameter as a variable.' These two tests t. made on crude oil stored in tankspainted white showed P=true vapor pressure of the stock at its average a loss,of 30 percent of the loss for gasoline storage temperature, in pounds.per squarepredictedo inch absolute. (This may be determined from by equation (1). Part of this reduction is obviously the Reid vapor pressure, using Fig. 2 for caused by the beneficial effect of the white paint; the finished products and Fig. 3 for crude oil.) remainder of the reduction in value represents the swing V.,=average wind velocity, in miles per hour. of the experimental error. • - k,=a recommended seal factor: A paint factor* k,=0.90 applies to the loss value k,=1.00 for tight-fitting seals (typical of mod- for tanks painted white instead of the gray or aluminum ern metallic and nonmetallic seals). colors used on 56 of the 60 loss tests. For example, if - - k,=1.33 for loose-fitting seals (typical of seals two tanks contain a product with the same Reid vapor - • - • • blunt prior to 1942). pressure, a white-painted tank will be cooler and have . ke=a recommended factor distinguishing'between a lower true vapor pressure than an adjacent aluminum- gasoline and crude oil storage: painted tank with otherwise comparable conditions. • 14=1.00 for gasoline. This will cause an additional reduction in the estimated k =0.75 for crude oil. loss. There can be no doubt, qualitatively, about the kp=a recommended paint factor for'color of shell loss-reduction benefit of white paint. Three tests on - - and roof: products stored in tanks painted white were in a group . . kp=1.00 for light gray or aluminum. totaling eight tests in riveted tanks with pan roofs and kp=099 for white. single seals. Two of these white tanks contained crude oil for which a 25 percent reduction in loss has been For 90 percent of the applications for a seal in justified. After this correction is made these two tests normally good- operating condition, estimated losses •show at 40 percent of the correlation for tanks painted calculated by means of equation (1) should deviate gray or aluminum. The test in the third white-painted ,) from the true loss by not more than = 25 percent. - 12. Losses may exceed the calculated amount by two to •-A 1.00 factor was chosen for tanks painted gray or alumi- thrte times for a seal in poor condition as discussed in num because they comprised 93 percent of the tests and pro- more detail in Chapter 4. The basic form ofequation vided a firm correlation. In contrast, the paint factor for white tanks i9 less accurate since it is based on only 7 percent of the (1) for the five types of tanks, without modifications tests and complicated by the effect of crude oil storage in some by k, and k,, is plotted in Appendix IV in the form: instances. • 16. . APORATION Loss FROM FLOATING-ROOT INKS I • tank, which contained gasoline, was 55 percent of,the The existence of a common value, Kt=0.13, for correlation for tanks painted gray or aluminum. Out of both riveted-pan double-seal and riveted-pontoon single- a total of 15 welded-tank tests, the test in a single seal tanks means their loss rate is similar but not identi- white-painted tank was also well below the appropriate cal. A higher product temperature will prevail in a correlation. Thus, tests in all four white tanks showed tank with a pan roof than in a tank with a pontoon losses below the average. ;j roof at otherwise equal conditions, and a higher loss rate will be calculated. The maximum vapor pressure D. Significance of Variables 1 of stock which may be stored without boiling loss is - It is convenient to express seal length in terms of lower for the pan-roof tank. - diameter because they are directly proportional. How- Some theories explaining why evaporation loss from ever, this study shows that loss is not directly propor- crude oil should be lower than from gasoline at other- tional to diameter, and that if diameter is doubled, loss wise similar conditions may be found in API Bulletin' will more than double, see Appendix IV. Several 2518. - individual effects produce this cumulative result,�in- _ _ eluding increased wind effect for tanks of large diameter E. Withdrawal Loss and decreased shading effect from the shell. Inasmuch Withdrawal loss resulting from evaporation of stock- as estimated evaporation Ioss, as expressed in equation (1), increases as DI.5, a large-diameter tank has a which fails to drain down the shell as the roof descends _ smaller loss than two smaller diameter tanks totalingis negligible under most conditions. Laboratory data the same volume. There were no data for tanks larger determining the clingage of gasoline to a rusty steel than 145 ft in diameter. Until additional data are surface support this conclusion. The tests show that available, loss from large-diameter tanks should' be cIingage ranges from 0.02 to 0.10 bbl of gasoline per D 1,000 sq ft of steel surface which has a'scale ranging estimated as 150 times the loss for a 1'504t-diameter from light rust to dense tight rust. • • • • tank. • , The loss is represented by the equation: Loss increases when the vapor pressure increases. RT=22,400 C , The effect becomes pronounced at high vapor pressures. C j�} •(2) Doubling 2.psia to 4 psia nearly doubles loss, whereas . Where: • • doubling 5.5 psia to 11 psia triples loss. The loss rate W=withdrawal loss, in barrels-per million barrels . accelerates rapidly thereafter. For example, a 13.3-1b- throughput: t. RVP stock at a-main-body temperature of 92 F will 'C=0.02 (based on barrels of clingage per 1,000 sq • have a true vapor pressure of 12.5 psia. In an alumni- ft of shell surface). - num-painted tank, this stock may be at its boiling point D=tank diameter, in feet. . - (101 F at 14.7 psiaY between the seal and the shell Equation (2) can be simplified to: • for several hours each day, causing large daily losses. P - At high main-body temperatures, the stock could boil ",•448 many hours each day and the loss would be'unpre- D dictably high. The form P serves as a useful Withdrawal Ioss for gunite-lined tanks used for stor- • 14•7—P ing gasoline can be significant and should be considered flag to indicate excessive losses as P approaches The laboratory clingage data indicate a factor C=2.0, 14.7-psia atmospheric pressure and no substantial error which is a hundredfold greater than for light rust scale. is introduced within the valid range of this,correlation. Since withdrawal loss suppresses standing-storage loss, Loss increases but does not double when average it is recommended that a factor C=1.0 be used in wind velocity doubles. This variable was•difficult to equation (2) for gunite-lined tanks used for storing correlate because the wind velocity data were somewhat gasoline. weak, being based in many instances on data from the nearest weather bureau rather than at the test site. F.•Use of Results • - • Twelve tests on similar tanks, 117 ft' in diameter with • - pan roofs and double seals, substantiate the selection Evaporation losses from floating-roof • tanks may be of an exponent of 0.7 for the wind velocity. In these readily estimated by the use of Fig. 1(A) and 1(B). tests, the masking effect of changes in diameter (a Factors which must be known are: tank diameterrtype strong variable) is. absent. Actually, loss will not be of tank shell, roof, and a d seal; Reid vapor pressure of zero at zero wind velocity because of breathing losses in stored product; average temperature of stored product; the seal zone. For average wind velocities exceeding and average wind velocity at the storage site. 4 mph, the 0.7 exponent fits the data. The exponential The true vapor pressure, P, is obtained from the form is convenient for correlation and there are no vapor pressure charts, see Fig. 2 and 3. To use these recorded localities having less than 4-mph .average i charts the Rcid vapor pressure of the stock must be ( wind velocity. 1 • known. If the stock is gasoline or another finished - i:a-`,;4- ?roduct, Fig. 2 should beThd. If the value . Withdrawal losses• nuld be added for gunitc-Iined �,t c i .-..;of the ASTM distillation e.',. it 10 percent tanks used for storim isoline. ' „,a.,,:,_:.•i) is not known, it may be _....mated using -;re -'Led values given in a note on Fig. 2. .Fora G. Maintenance and Operation to Minimize Losses :i:, 1,,;:ponent stock,the value of S is zero. In multi- Evaporation losses from floating-roof tanks arc.high _ Jthm-on.-s. stocks, which are usually handled in pe- when the shoes arc exposed above the top ring. Losses ( =o.e..� sscerations, the value of S increases with a are even higher when the roof is resting on its legs. If ,;; _age in the "front end" or light components. operation under either condition cannot be avoided, it • 1 Fcr'. .de.oils, the vapor pressure chart given in should be minimized. g ��uld be used. Fig. 3 is intended to cover the Maintenance of the seal is discussed in Chapter 4. -i ;rude oils which have not been subjected to - ;¢rem ,.cathering or mixed with light stocks for pipe- H. Miscellaneous Benefits • - t; e ,rtation. If the crude oil has been subjected Experience has shown that floating-roof f tanks are- . 1r, eit_b.;•`I these extremes, a special determination of extremely safe because of the almost complete elimina- __ ti,e u-.z vapor pressure at storage temperature should tion of the vapor space. Vapor can burn only at the - Pe m- seal, and usually can be readily extinguished. ' _ t, The i,,erage stock temperature should be used in Corrosion resulting from storage of corrosive stocks c_ 4 pressure charts to determine the true vapor is at a minimum in floating-roof tanks. The absence of firessurz, For a given operation this usually is known a large vapor space, which prevents the accumulation }rith air accuracy because it is used regularly for vol- I of water vapor and oxygen, is responsible for this .;me aRections in gaging operations. I benefit. • • CHAPTER 4—GUIDE TO SELECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SEALS One major decision which must be made by users seals should and generally do follow the contour of the -. - •t g03tI g-roof tanks is the type of seal to be specified , tank shell more closely than do metallic seals. An even - _ :fir new tanks--metallic or nonmetallic. Other deci- , pressure is exerted on the membrane which contacts • ;you wl;i;h must be made are: the degree of tightness the tank shell causing it to press evenly against the •cqui.-el to prevent excessive losses from seals in use shell. In contrast, metallic shoes are held in contact .nd the atuount of attention required to•maintain this with the shell by pressure at intervals and do not press - gQhtnes and maintenance requirements and justifica- into out-of-round areas as closely as nonmetallic seals. ion for replacement of seals. Metallic seals are designed to contact the shell over a much greater height than nonmetallic. Vapor, to be Guitle to Selection—Metallic Vs. Nonmetallic lost, must pass upward from.the liquid surface,between ;► the seal and the shell, to the top of the seal. The - Unfortunately there are no test data either on oper- amount lost depends upon the width and height of the .'gig tanks or on test models to directly compare the gap, and the wind.. For an.equivalent gap, wind cur- -,-Isses re,ulting from the use of metallic seals and non- rents acting on a shallow depth of seal erode vapors ,y'etallic seals, thus the following discussion is qualita- away at a faster rate. Thus wind current action is more -ve. Eaeh type of seal has certain features aimed to- severe for nonmetallic seals if a gap exists. • .card to+a reduction, and only those features which ' Windshields arc commonly used with nonmetallic affect evaporation loss are considered. Seal characteris- seals. The shields also prevent snow buildup which can �cs which affect loss and which should be considered force the seal away from the shell and lessen its effec- d selecting a new seal are: tiveness. Secondary seals are commonly used with - • Initial fit. metallic seals on riveted tanks,see Chapter 2,Par. C. - ,. Height of contact with the tank shell above the - It is somewhat easier to check nonmetallic seals for liquid. effectiveness and maintenance than it is to check metal- ;, tints shielding. • lic seals. A nonmetallic seal properly designed and _ installed provides a good seal. A mechanism failure ,. Leakage and permeation. I ' . usually will nullify its effectiveness and immediate re- ' ▪ Maintenance required to retain the initial fit. pair will be required. Normally, simple visual inspec- - tion will determine if the seal is properly serving it's ▪ Expretzd service life. purpose. It is more difficult to check the effectiveness In initial fit, nonmetallic seals generally are superior of metallic seals because the many bolted connections ., metallic seals. By nature of their design and types, and fabric joints in the primary seal can have concealed .f matt'iials used in their construction, nonmetallic leaks. - • ' . • . .` -'• w �;+r.'+,ti.� *1.. .�i, ';• ft 'E•�`�i�c't'��n�,,t};�,y�y `i d : =`�e..a n' ,F--,-to-►,cc:•.. j :�4 .- ;... 'fr e 7! �i r -} i�c _ ",'i";: •{�;.:,• �C-L t;:,'7,t k'.0 1 •Ss- J�; b'f0`,• x Sr tom!-,�, •, . �_ iO4' ' -... �•,n .. � ..'.•aiG`.^�:-� .a x�. .7..r ��,.: .M. cj� � ')., 4.3�'. t _, rs� `��' �„�• ' (Th ' a 18 - PORATION LOSS FROM FLOATING-ROO ANKS - The service life of metallic seals has been observed One laboratory test measured:loss between the shoe • over many years. As stated previously, it is not uncom- of a metallic seal and the tank shell for several condi- • mon for a metallic seal to function effectively for as tions of gap and air velocity measured parallel to the long as 15 years. Actual service life for nonmetallic shell. Another test measured vapor permeation through . - seals will only be determined through usage. Some of the sealing fabric. Relative loss rates for different condi- these seals have been in service since 1951. With the tions of seal fit were extrapolated from these laboratory improvements in materials and designs that accompany , data and are shown in Table 2. - usage, it is expected that the service life of nonmetallic ; . seals will approach that of metallic seals. ITABLE 2—Relative Loss Rates for Different Conditions of A well-designed nonmetallic seal, with ample vertical • Seal Fit shell contact under varying widths of seal space•and •I Gap • with a good weather shield, will hold standing-storage i (Inch) Loss Ratio losses to the low values presented in this bulletin. Main- * 1.0 tenance required to retain a good fit is slight; however, • . . . 26 in event of a serious mechanism failure, the seal ceases I 3.7 to exist as such. A well-designed metallic seal will - . yield results approaching those for nonmetallic seals, It is admitted that the translation of Iaboratory data however, maintaining fit and vapor tightness may be into losses for field tanks leaves much to be desired. more difficult over the period of expected service life. ' However, in the absence of any actual operating test • • i data, Table 2 may be useful to emphasize the impor- B. Guide to Maintenance and Replacement tance of effective seals and to provide a guide to corn- - • Any expenditures for maintenance'and replacement pare replacement and repair costs with savings 'ex of seals must be balanced against the return in savings. trapolated from laboratory data. No field test data have been developed to show the There are no data from which to predict losses caused. difference in loss rate between effective and partially by holes in the sealing fabric, leaking connections, or • splices on metallic seals. These holes greatly increase effective seals. The Evaporation Loss Committee con- sidered soliciting field tests for this purpose as well a's the losses produced by windage. It is recommended for determining the difference between various types of ' that any'holes or obvious Ieaking connections be re- seals. Determination of the latter could require even ; paired as soon as they are detected. Such slight mainte- ( longer periods of standing storage than are required to . name costs will be returned in savings very quickly. - demonstrate the loss for a given type of roof. The ' Maintenance requirements for nonmetallic seals de- expense of appropriating storage for comparatives loss pend upon the type; normally they are slight. Tank tests'was prohibitive. However, information from sev- manufacturers can supply recommended maintenance eral pilot scale tests was available. and inspection procedures. i - - CONCLUSION • .• ' • . The correlations derived in this study are sufficiently justifiable except perhaps on large-diameter tanks— accurate to permit evaluation of the floating roof as a 200 ft in diameter or greater. vapor conservation device. I Although proper operation of the floating roof and - Many months of storage or the setup of many maintenance of the seal require very little care, the time so allocated is valuable because it assures that the transfers is required to determine the very low loss . full benefit of the roof in vapor conservation service . rates involved. Further tests are not economically will be obtained. . - i, ' - . •' - 1 • . a . • • • APPENDIX I-SUMMARY OF DATA FOR RIVETED TANKS WITH PAN ROOFS • . • • True Vapor . • • Pressure • Loss WInd Wind (Pounds per (Barrels DIameter DIameter (Miles (Miles Square Inch . • L. Test - Working per Year) (Feet). •.(Feet) per Hour) per Hour) Absolute) p \�•+ y+.•,( P a'• • No. Tank Days L, D D'•' • Y.. V." P C l4 7-P) \14.7-P) • Single Seal - 1 No 58 278 60 440 7.5 4.1 6.3 0.823 82.5 2 - - -- No - 43• -. - -91- _ • 50 - 345 12.6- _ -5.9 - - - 5.2 -0.644 - -24.0 3 No 71 1046 • 144 1720 6.6 3.7 6.3 0.823 344.0 4 No 28 157 • 45 300 11.7 S.6 3.9 0.489 57.4 S No 51 84 60 440 5.0 3.1 6.5 0.850 31.9 • - - 6 Yes - 47 99 -, -90---- 850 6.4 • 3.7 -5.4- -- - --- 0.682 -- 39.2 --- - -- • v 7 No 77 '29 15 60 8.7 • 4.55 5.1 0.632 10.1 8 No . 61 164 95 930 6.5 3.71 4.9 0.608 72.8 • Double Seal • - ' 9 No 32 • •862 117 1270 8.8 4.6 5.8 0.745 ' 251.0 •• • 10 No 25 '1140 117 1270 9.6 4.9 5.4 • 0.682 341.0 11 No • 68 619 117 1270 8.2 4.35 • 4.2 0.524 . 271.0 ' 12 No 50 710 117 1270 8.7 • 4.55 • 5.5 0,694 225.0 ' • 13 No 59 464 • .117 • 1270 I1.0 5.37 3.0 0.379 227.5 14 No • 118 605 117 1270 8.7 4.55 5.0 0.620 - 217.0 15 • No 128 566 . 117 1270 8.5 4.5 4.8 0.59.1 212.0 16 No 30 423 117 1270 10.2 5.1 3.1 0.390 . 213.0 , • • 17 No 90 346 117 ' 1270 • 11.3 . 5.49 2.2 0.298 211.0 • 18 _ ' No 120 511 117 • ' •, 1270 9.4 • 4.8 4.1 0.512 208.0 • • 19 • No 30 • • 494 •117 . 1270 • 10.7 • 5.28 3.7 • 0.465 183.0 20 No 120 . 369 117 1270 11.2 5.45 2.2 '0.298 227.0 • . ' 21 No 55 • .204. ' • 45 . 300 • 9.6 4.9 6.4' 0,834 50.0 , • • • ' • • APPENDIX II-SUMMARY OF DATA FOR RIVETED TANKS WITH PONTOON ROOFS • True Vapor Pressure • Loss • •Wind Wind . (Pounds per .,: . (Barrels Diameter Diameter (Miles (Miles Square Inch L, Test Working per Year) ' (Feet) (Feet) per Hour) per Hour) Absolute) p \••' „r p v/ No. Tank Days L, D . D" • Y„ V." P (14.7-P) • - \14.7-P) Single Seal • 1 No •128 204 40 250 9.3 4.76 4.2 - 0.524 - 82 - - 2 No 128 531 117 '1270 9.3 4.76 3.3 0.4.12 271 3 No 102 171 • . 24 116 • 7.1 3.95 ' 4.6 0.570 76 • 4 No 184 __ 1478 60 440 _ 14.0 6.35 10.2 . 1.76 1.32 S • No 39 51 40 250 15.1 6.7 5.0 0.627 12 - 6 Yes 21 • 885 114 1200 13.0 • 6.03 6.7 0.870 169 7 Ycs 21 • 87 3S 210 13.0 6.03 6.8 0.890 16 . - v,, 8 Yes • 57 248 95 920 10.1 S.07 6.1. . 0.783 • 62.5 0 9 Yes 58 380 95 920 • 10.1 5.07 ' 5.8 0.745 • 101 Double Seal 10 No • 99 582 120 1300 9.6 4.7 • 4.4 0.546 227 11 No 41 546 120 1300 10.6 5.25 4.9 0.608 171 12 No 48 904 120 1300 10.9 .• 5.34 4.5 0.560 302 13 , No 63 580 120 1300 11.2 5.45 • 2.9 0.367 289 • 14 No • 139 382 90 . 850 9.8 • 4.45 4.2 ' • 0.524 164 15 No 43 127 90 850 10.8 ' 5.3 4.7 • 0.582 41 ' 16 No 51 401 100 1000 14.6' 6.53 . 3.7 0.465 132 17 No • ; 69 222 100 1000 8.9 4.62 5.4 0.682 70 18 'No 55 • 113 • 70 590 . 9.9 4.99 2.0 • ' 0.274 83 19 No 360 455 . • 60 440 16.0 • 7.0 ,9.5 • , 1.51 43 • • 20 Yes . 58 147 ' 70 590 12.1 5.74 • 1.52. 0.22 ' 116 21 No 74 600 ' ' 70 . 590 9.0 • 4.65 ' 5.7 0.730 177 • - . 22 No 34 301 70 590 9.0 4.65 . 5.6. . 0.715 91 23 • No 40 • 0 • 70 590 ... • ... ' • 2.0 0.274 • 0 ' ' • 24 No 69• 0 70 . • 590 • ... ••3.2 • 0.400 •• 0 • • , •. , • • • , a . • 1 • • • • • - APPENDIX III-SUMMARY OF DATA FOR WELDED TANKS WITI!. PONTOON ROOFS • • True Vapor • • Pressure . •• Loss Wind • Wind (Pounds per • •. 1., • t • (Barrels Diameter Diameter (Miles (Miles Square Inch 1, �•, V��•r Test . • Working • per Year) (Feet) (Feet) per Hour) • per Hour) Absolute) . . No. • Tank Days L, • D II"' V. V„'•' P 14.7-P) C P 14.7-P)�•� • • - - ' Single Seal . • I No . 22 376 75 650 .10.3 5.14 4.8- 0.594 123 2 No 77 208 - 78 680 • 7.0 ,• 3.91 S.4 0.682 78 3 No • 63 80 . 48 . 330 12.0 5.69 ' 5.0 . • 0.620 23 -• 4 - No --- - --68 _- ; 0 48 - 330 - 12.0 5.69 3.9-- - - 0.489 0 S No 61 ' 0 75 650 3.7 0.465 0 6 No ' 96 53•1 145 1780 9.8 4.95 9.55 .1.54 70 ' ' 7 • No . 40 : • 274 145 . 1780 8.S 4.50 10.2 1.76 35 • Double Seal • 8 No 61 • • • 186 91 860 10.4 5.16 2.5 0.33I 10S 9 No 124 299 120 1300 14.2 6.1 4.8 0.594 83 • 10 Yes 70 328 120 1300 . ' 16.5 7.14 3.8 0.478 96 • • II Yes 60 • 0 70 590 12.0 5.68 • - 2.7 . 0.352 0 • 12 • Ycs 60 ' 255 ' 140 • 1650 12.0 5.68 3.0 0.379 118 • 13 Yes 34 . 37S ' 140 1650 • 11.7 5.6 3.4 0.421 159 ' 14 . Yes 52 0 .. 70 590 . 11.7 5.6 2.6 0.343 0 ' IS Ycs • 3S 703 • : .93 900 8.0 . 4.29 6.7 0.870 188 • i , AI'PENDIX IV—GRAPII OF FLOATING-ROOF STANDING-STORAGE LOSS EQUATION Equation and Curves Shown Wcre Derived from Actual Test Results t • Form of Equation:k. k, k, K, D'•'= • L, • . • V' r`14.;/ ' Where: • • k,= 1.00 for gasoline. • k,= 1.00 for gray or aluminum paint. • k.= 1.33 seal factor (older seal, built prior to 1942). •• . K,=tank-type factor. D=tank diameter, in feet. ' Lr=standing-storage evaporation loss in barrels per year. �,' ' V.=average wind velocity, in miles per hour. P=true vapor pressure,in pounds per square inch absolute. 400 - RIVETED TANK WITH PAN ROOF ' SINGLE SEAL ksKt=.19 300 • I 1 N • N • RIVETED TANK ►; • '' PAN ROOF DOUBLE SEAL • . • 0 OR PONTOON ROOF—SINGLE d . SEAL ks K t =.17 as 200 t` RIVETED TANK WITH PONTOON ROOF ,,.y 03 • DOUBLE SEAL > . . lc. Kt = .15 100. - �°- • • WELDED TANK • WITH PAN OR PONTOON ROOF • . ' • SINGLE OR DOUBLE SEAL • , •• k:Kt= .OG 0 ••10 20 30 40� 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 '120 430 140 150 • • •• TANK DIAMETER IN FEET • • • U `' • . APPENDIX V---CO:1111'1TTEE 11IEilIBERSIIIP . . . . r Committee on Evaporation Loss (1961) - •E. L. Hoffman (Chairman) Socony Mobil Oil Co., Inc. . • New York, N. Y. ' . H. C. Packard (Vice Chairman) Shell Oil Co! New York, N. Y. W. L. Cullison (Secretary) • - American Petroleum Institute - • _ New York, N. Y. • R. J. Austin American Oil Co. Whiting, Ind. J. P. Collier The British American Oil Company, Ltd.. . ..Toronto,Ont.,Canada _ , J. M. Dempster The Standard Oil Co. (Ohio) - Cleveland, Ohio E. K. Dewey, Jr. Continental Oil Co. Ponca City,Okla. D. E.Hanson Sinclair Refining Co. • New York, N. Y. R. J. Hawes Tidewater Oil Co. New York, N. Y. F. Horton Texaco Inc. • Houston, Texas F. . Irwin • Imperial Oil Limited Toronto,Ont.,Canada A. W. Jasek Humble Pipe Line Co. • Houston, Texas . W. S. Jennings The Atlantic(Refining Co. Philadelphia, Pa. O. W. Johnson Standard Oil Company of California San Francisco, Calif. R. T. Mapston Richfield Oil Corp Wilmington, Calif. J. H. McClintock Esso 'Research and Engineering Co. Florham Park, N.J. H. S. Mount Sun Oil Co.1 Philadelphia,Pa. K G. Oswald The Pure Oil Co. Palatine, Ill. H. E. Simonson • Phillips Petroleuml Co. Bartlesville, Okla. W. J. Talley The Pure Oil Co. ,. ..;. .. .Palatine,Ill. Subcommittee II--Correlations (1961) ••. . A. W. Jasek (Chairman) Humble Pipe Line Co. • 'Houston,Texas - - O. Gerbes (Secretary) ..Humble Oil and Refining Co. Baytown, Texas ' - P. D. Baker Humble Oil and Refining Co. ' Tulsa, Okla. A. P. Giannini General American Transportation Corp. • Chicago,Ill. - . D. E. Hanson Sinclair Refining Co.- New York, N. Y. W. S. Jennings The Atlantic'Refining Co. Philadelphia,Pa. O. W. Johnson Standard Oil Company of California -San Francisco,Calif. . R. T. Mapston . Richfield Oil•Corp. Wilmington, Calif. H. S. Mount Sun Oil Co.1 Philadelphia,Pa. • T. D. Mueller Graver Tank and Manufacturing Co. East Chicago,Ind. H. C. Packard Shell'Oil Co. New York, N. Y. H. E.-Simonson • Phillips Petroleum Co. Bartlesville, Okla. . • A B. Stevens San Gabriel, Calif. . I. L. \Yssmiller , . Chicago Bridge and Iron Co. .Chicago, Ill. - Task Force on Metallic Seals . D. R. Miley (Chairman) Sun Oil Co. Toledo, Ohio • R. W. Bodley Graver Tank and Manufacturing Co. East Chicago, lnd. L. H. Fabian Nooter Corp! St Louis, Mo. A. Fino Pittsburgh—Dees Moines Steel Co. Warren, Pa. V. Larsen Chicago Bridge and Iron Co. New York. N. Y. K. G. Oswald The Pure Oil Co. Palatine, Ill. • 23 . 24 i-,v,PORATION Loss FROM FLOATING-ROOT TANKS . • • Former Members of the Committees Who Assisted in Preparation of This Bulletin (. O. C. Bridgeman • Plillips Petroleum Co. Bartlesville, Okla. -J. H. Brown Tidewater Oil Co. New York, N. Y. W. H. Creel Phillips Petroleum Co. Bartlesville, Okla. S. H. Dowdell The British American Oil Company, Ltd.. . . .Toronto,Ont.,Canada. T. C. Frick The Atlantic Refining Co. - Dallas,Texas - . J. P. Hammond Amerada Petroleum Corp. - Tulsa, Okla. H. M. Hart Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Whiting, Ind. - . E. P. Kropp The Standard Oil Company (Ohio) Cleveland, Ohio • R. W. Martz Esso Standard Oil Co. New York, N. Y. C. C. Miller The Atlantic Refining Co. Dallas. Texas - - E. O. Perkins Texaco Inc. • . - New York, N. Y. _ N. A. Pierson , • Gerieial American Transportation Corp. Chicago, Ill. E. F. Wagner The Atlantic Refining Co. Philadelphia, Pa. . • • • ' rli • Ii II I •• it _ • 11 - • API EVAPORATION LOSS BULLETINS API Bulletin 2512: Tentative Methods of Measuring Evaporation Loss from Petroleum Tanks and Transportation Equipment (1957) $2.00 • API Bulletin 2513: Evaporation Loss in the Petroleum Industry—Causes and Control (1959) $1.50 API Bulletin 2514: Evaporation Loss from Tank Cars, Tank Trucks, and , - Marine Vessels (1959) • API Bulletin 2515: Use of Plastic Foam to Reduce Evaporation.Loss r (1961) • .. $1.00 API Bulletin 2516: Evaporation Los from Low-Pressure Tanks (1962) .. $1.00 • • API Bulletin 2517: Evaporation Loss from Floating Roof Tanks (1962) . . $1.00 • • • • • • • 3.1—Feb. 1952 �` R[Cfl1 P 2S\\ Affidavit of Pu icatii►, 1 JU 2 STATE OF WASHINGTON �4, NOTICE OF COUNTY OF KING ss PUBLIC HEARING \� 4,--:", A public hearing will be .�`.41,- ��� held by the Renton Land 1 \� D E P AQ -• Use Hearing Examiner at his w;�, /i` Mar a r e t Ha r b a u h �.—,._..d in the coun- being first duly sworn on cil chambers, cityhall, Re- nton, Washington, on Feb- ruary 7,1978,at 9:00 A.M.to oath,deposes and says that 8 he is the Chief Clerk of consider the following peti- tions: THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) 1.KOHL EXCAVATING, times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and INC./IVAN C. CHRIST- has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred IANSON, APPLICA- to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- TION FOR REZONE paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, FROM G TO R-2, File and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained .--No. R-114-i i; property at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Rentonlocated on Sunset Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Boulevard S.W.between 4 . Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, 80th Avenue South and Washington.That the annexed is a Public Hearing S OBIL OIL COR,1Q. RATIONATION "'A-SPECIAL PERMIT TO INSTALL ONE ADDI- TIONAL 50,000 BAR- REL GASOLINE STOR- as it was published in regular issues(and AG N ile No.SP not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period 6-77• rope sated • in-the existing Mobil, Oil Tank Farm area of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the situated approximately 1,000 feet south of the Intersection of the future. 2.7...day of J a tea ry ,19 78 ,and ending the S.W. 23rd Street and Lind Avenue S.W.direct- ly south of the Olympic Pipe Line facility. day of ,19 both dates 3. S AND M INVEST- inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- MENTS, APPUCATION scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT CON- I charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $.27... 2which A AND MS IN R 2 has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the SP 1 R-3 ZONE,File No- SP-123-78;.pnoperty lo- first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent sated at the northeast insertion. corner of Grant Avenue �y� South and South Puget J 1 Legal descriptions of files- noted above on file in the Chief Clerk rReent ent. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 27 day of All Interested persons to Renton Planning Depart- said petitions are invited to be present at the public January 1978 hearing on February 7,1978 at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. R . 6�� �� � Published In the Renton 1 Notary Public " and for the State of Washingto , 7, 197-Chronicle January residing at Kent, King Coun 27, 1978.R4771 — Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. OF R. A. • A. �� z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 2 .o p ® CHARLES J. DELAURENTI t MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 1 * L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 O � ,Q47. SE Pit 0 March 3, 1978 Mr. Steve Kelly 1103 IBM Building Seattle, WA 98101 RE: SP-066-77, Mobil Oil Corporation. Dear Mr. Kelly: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved, subject to conditions as, noted on the Examiner's report of February 16, 1978, has not been' appealed within the time period set by ordinance, and therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Si. 4111111111* L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk • r. ,,,,,?... ,\cy (-L.," ,1 i oC�J �`(.\ \6.,c, 0 :��CGu,4t,��'r AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) L. Rick Beeler being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 16th day of February , 19 78 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. • Subscribed and sworn this day of \-A\- m-.( 19 . \ ANY\41, f\f\. • Notary Public in and 'for the State of Washington, residing at Penton Application, Petition or Case: Mobil Oil Corporation, SP-066-77 (The minutes contain a £Lst of the patct,%e's of necon.d) February 16, 1978 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION , APPLICANT: Mobil Oil Corporation FILE NO. SP-066-77 LOCATION: Approximately 1,000 feet south of intersection of future S.W. 23rd Street and Lind Avenue S.W. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests the approval of the addition of a 50,000 barrel gasoline storage tank with an internal • covered floating roof and a vapor recovery system as per Renton Bulk Storage regulations. Storage tank will be within existing filled and developed area. • SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning,Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. . • PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on January 31, 1978. ' PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking'the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the' subject as follows: • The hearing was opened on. February 7, 1978 at 10:50 a.m. in the Council, Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. • Parties wishing to testify were sworn. • It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #3: Plan of the Proposed Tank Exhibit #4: Elevation Drawings Exhibit #5:' Construction Details (4 pages) Exhibit #6: Site Map Exhibit #7: Landscape Plan with staff comments Exhibit #8: Landscape Plan as submitted Exhibit #9: Letter to Department of Ecology from King County Division of Hydraulics, dated January 3, 1978, regarding flood control zone application. The Examiner asked a representative from the Renton Fire Department to testify. ,Responding was: • Ed Wooton • Renton Fire Department • • Mr. Wooton indicated that although the Fire Department does not have the authority. to negate the wording of the Bulk Storage Ordinance adopted in 1975 by the City Council, it was the departmental opinion that requirements in the ordinance pertained to new • construction of facilities and not to the subject request for one additional 50,000 barrel tank in an existing storage facility. He reported that it was the consensus of the Fire Chief and representatives of the Mobil Oil Corporation at the conclusion of a meeting this date that elimination of the requirement for •an automatic foam system was not in conflict with requirements Of the Bulk Storage Ordinance, the NFPA SP-066-77 Page Two Pamphlet 30, and the Uniform Fire Code. He also indicated that representatives of the corporation had agreed to installation of an alarm system as requested. The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: Steven Kelly, Attorney 1103 IBM Building Seattle, WA 98101 Mr. Kelly indicated that certain provisions of the report were objectionable which he would address in his testimony. He referenced Section 0.5 relating to landscaping provisions and indicated that although he objected to provision of landscaping to the extent recommended in the report, landscaping would be provided along Lind Avenue upon completion of the roadway project and suggested a conformance deadline of 180 days following completion of construction as acceptable to the corporation. Regarding Section 0.6, Mr. Kelly emphasized that because of the nature of the fence for security purposes, the 80% opaque requirement would prevent personnel from visually monitoring the site. He noted that in Section 0.8, the date of issuance of the Department of Ecology permit for waste discharge should be revised to January, 1978. Referencing Section 0.12 relating to an on-site fire suppression system, Mr. Kelly expressed strong objection to the requirement for an automatic foam system, emphasized the adequacy of the current manual foam system, the expense of converting the system, and stated that such systems currently are not in operation on the west coast. Regarding requirements of the Bulk Storage Ordinance, he felt that the intent of the requirements contained in the ordinance were designed to apply to new facilities and not to additions to existing facilities. The Examiner asked for further comments. Responding was: A. E. McCluskey Environmental Conservation Manager Mobil Oil Western Region 612 S. Flower Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Mr. McCluskey reported that the Mobil Oil facility meets all requirements of NFPA Pamphlet 30 and the Uniform Fire Code. He indicated that if such automatic foam systems were available and approved by Underwriters Laboratory they would be included in the requirements of the referenced documents, and would be installed and utilized for petroleum storage by all companies. He emphasized that such automatic systems were not currently in use either by Mobil or other corporations. He explained the physical nature of the storage facilities located in the City of Renton and indicated that advantages to the closed tank because of the space between the top of the tank and the' floating roof included effective control of fires with foam injection systems either above the roof or through submersible injection. He reviewed disadvantages to an automatic system which included inadvertent reaction to stimulation other than fire by the system; utilization of all available foam creating an emergency situation in the event of a subsequent fire; contamination of unleaded petroleum products resulting in noncompliance with federal regulations for maintenance of leaded and unleaded products on site and subsequent $10,000 per day fines; safety hazards for on-site personnel; and requirements for additional provision of storage for foam system. Advantages to the existing manual system included ability to direct foam to specific areas; personnel previously trained to effective utilize system; and capability to connect to existing fire department alarm system. He noted that the corporation had contributed $300,000 for construction of a water main along Lind Avenue in the event of future expansion and stressed that the corporation maintains a 10-year safety record utilizing the current manual ADT system. In response to the Examiner's inquiry regarding expense of conversion to an automatic system, Mr. McCluskey deferred his response to a representative of National Foam Systems, Inc. Responding was: Martin Boyd Sales Engineer, National Foam Systems, Inc. 2054 S. 308th Street Federal Way, WA Mr. Boyd explained procedures for installation of a thermostatically controlled automatic detection system to the existing facility, which would include installation of 8 to 10 thermostat devices inside the roofs along with an explosion-proof junction box at each unit. He advised that cleaning of the tanks would be required to allow such installation as well as contracting with fuel engineering service, and installation of electrical wiring and supervisory panel, full detection system, break glass stations, and manual alarm stations. He reported that the total expenditure for automatic detection would be $95,400 and actuation of the foam equipment would total $133,500 which did not include costs incurred due to interruption of business or federal fines incurred. Mr. Boyd SP-066-77 Page Four 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the State Department of Ecology, lead agency. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The proposal is compatible with the requirements of Section 4-713 (H-1) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. 8. The proposal is compatible with the requirements of Section 4-734 (Bulk Storage Regulations) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, except for: a. Section 7-734. (J) : requirement for two access points. b. Section 4-734. (H) : requirement for approval of the storm drainage plans by the Public Works Department. c. Section 4-734. (N) , (0) , (P) : requirement for certification of meeting all pollution control regulations. d. Section 4-734. (0) .3: requirement for fully automatic fire suppression system. Once the Lind Avenue South local improvement district is completed adjacent to the subject site, the proposal will have two access points from the site onto Lind Avenue South, thereby complying with Section 4-734. (J) . Storm drainage plans have been reviewed by the State Department of Ecology (Exhibit #1) and the King County Department of Public Works (Exhibit #9) . No testimony was entered into the record as to the decision of the city Department of Public Works relative to the storm drainage plans. The former agencies have approved the proposal. Certification by the applicant of compliance with all of the applicable pollution and emission regulations will occur during three months of monitoring the site after construction of the additional oil storage tank. Certification is also to occur regarding Section 4-734. (0) .10, ground surfaces. The fully automatic fire suppression system as specified has not been adequately developed in the industry at this time. The Fire Department, therefore, recommended connection of the existing foam system to the tank, an automatic alarm system for the tank, and connection of the alarm system to the Valley Communications Center. This was acceptable to the applicant. 9. The Mobil Oil storage facility existed prior to enactment of Section 4-734, and therefore, was not evaluated per the location requirements of Section 4-734. (G) . But per Section 4-726. (B) the facility is in any case allowed to continue as a nonconforming use. Although Section 4-726. (B) .3 does not permit extension of nonconforming uses such as is proposed, Section 4-734. (P) .11 allows for expansion of existing facilities that emit hydrocarbons provided the produced emissions do not exceed twice the annual permitted emission levels. The staff report, Exhibit #1, paragraph 0.11 stated that the information 'supplied by the applicant indicated that the emission levels of Section 4-734. (P) would be met. Conformance with these emission levels must be established during the first three months of operation of the facility (Section 4-734. (P) .7) . The Puget Sound Air. Pollution Agency approved the evaporation recovery system (Notice No. 1789, Exhibit #1) as well as the Public Works Department (Letter dated August 9, 1977, Exhibit #1) . 10. Existing vegetation surrounds the facility on all but the northerly portion. Landscaping per Exhibit #8 was submitted to comply with the screening and landscaping requirements of Section 4-734. (E) . An eight-foot security fence surrounds the site. SP-066-77 Page Three further explained that the industry has not improved the system because of potential problems associated with it, such as false alarms caused by lightning, and danger of contamination by foam to the oil product causing expense and inconvenience to restore the product to its original specifications. He emphasized that the current manual system is in compliance with NFPA standards and that no automatic actuating foam system exists currently on the west coast of the United States. The Examiner asked for testimony in favor of the application. There was no response. The Examiner asked for testimony in opposition to the application. There was no response. Mr. Smith clarified a point raised by Mr. Kelly regarding deferral of landscaping requirements and advised that application for such deferral should be made to the City of Renton Board of Public Works which meets each Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. The Examiner asked.Mr. Smith for clarification of Section 0.1 regarding an interior portion of the dike in relationship to the 80% obscuring oqaque fence. Mr. Smith explained requirements for removal of an interior portion of the dike to provide spill protection. In response to the Examiner's inquiries, Mr. Smith advised that the Public Works Department had reviewed existing storm drainage plans and locations of catch basins on the site and review had occurred by the Department of Ecology for the waste discharge permit, but specific new plans would be reviewed during application for a building permit; odor standards would be required to be certified within a 90-day period; and explosive location requirements of Section 4-734.6 would be reviewed for compliance with the Washington State Explosive Act although Mr. Smith felt that it may not apply to storage of petroleum products. He also reported that certification would be required to assure compliance with requirements of the ordinance by the dike area due to surface water table in the vicinity. Regarding Mr. Kelly's concern regarding the 80% oqaque screen requirement, the Examiner inquired if alternatives to the proposal would be reviewed. Mr. Smith felt that due to the height and location of the existing fence, installation of berms and landscaping could be reviewed by the Planning Department to provide effective visual control and maintain visibility for safety purposes. Reiterating previous discussion regarding the automatic detection system, the Examiner asked Mr. Wooton for final comments from the department. Mr. Wooton reported that connection of the proposed storage tank to the existing manual system and connection of an automatic alarm system to the Valley Communications Center would satisfy departmental requirements in conjunction with NFPA Pamphlet 30 and the Uniform Fire Code. The Examiner asked Mr. Kelly to further explain concerns regarding the 80% opaque requirement of Section 4-734(E) 1. Mr. Kelly and Mr. McCluskey reported 24-hour traffic activity on the site, height and type of vehicles utilizing the site, and felt that the proposed fencing would impede safety. Mr. Kelly expressed the opinion that since the dike area would not be revised, changes should not be required to the nature of the dike itself to bring the entire facility up to ordinance requirements. He assured the Examiner that compliance with federal and state guidelines would be met to prevent occurrence of contamination of soil and subsurface water. He reiterated previous objections to the proposed automatic detection system and briefly explained the current manual foam system in operation at the facility. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith for final comments. Mr. Smith explained departmental review and application of the Bulk Storage Ordinance with regard to the non-conforming section of the Zoning Ordinance and indicated that although Mr. Kelly's concerns may apply to existing tanks on the site, review of the proposed tank must be made individually with regard to landscaping and screening. He reported that Exhibit #1 would remain as submitted with the exception of Section P.2 of the Planning Department recommendation relating to fire suppression systems which should be revised per recommendations_of the Fire Department representative through his testimony. He noted that deferral of landscaping requirements should be reviewed by the Board of Public Works, and discussion and review of the opaque screening fence be accomplished by the Planning Department to determine necessity of berming. The Examiner asked for further testimony. Since there was none, the hearing on Item #SP-066-77 was closed by the Examiner at 12:10 p.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a special permit to allow construction of a 50,000 barrel gasoline storage tank to the existing Mobil 'Oil Corporation bulk storage facility. SP-066-77 Page Six 5. Modification of the existing dyke (Exhibit #6) per approval of the Fire Department for conformance with applicable standards. 6. Implementation of the landscape plan, Exhibit #8. Upon removal or decrease of the existing vegetation at the perimeter of the site for construction of Lind Avenue South or Strander Boulevard, the need for additional landscaping and/or modification of the security fence should be evaluated by the Planning Department with the applicant for a mutually agreed upon solution. If possible, the rights-of-way for both streets should be used per a mutual agreement to assist in meeting these. landscaping requirements. ORDERED THIS 16th day of February, 1978. L. '\, k Bee er Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 16th day of February, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Ed Wooton, Renton Fire Department Steven Kelly, 1103 IBM Bldg. , Seattle, WA 98101 A. E. McCluskey, 612 S. Flower Street, Los Angeles, CA 90017 Martin Boyd, 2054 S. 308th St. , Federal Way, WA TRANSMITTED THIS 16th day of February, 1978 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director (2) Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 2, 1978. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could. not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said office. • SP-066-77 Page Five 11. Storm drainage plans have been approved by the Department of Ecology (Flood Control Zone Permit No. 1-2772-2, Exhibit #9, and Waste Discharge Permit No. WA-000194-5 (I) , Exhibit #1) . The Public Works Department has yet to decide upon the drainage plans. 12. The proposed tank will be located within an existing dyked containment area shared by existing tanks. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposal conforms to the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the Green River Valley. Prior to passage of the Comprehensive Plan for this area (Ordinance No. 3037, June 14, 1976) the Mobil Oil storage facility existed on the site. Therefore, the Comprehensive Plan can only be applied to the proposed additional tank. On all but the easterly side of the tank, existing vegetation exists to screen the tank. Existing landfill will be used for the tank. The net impact of the additional tank will be minimal relative to the existing facility. 2. The requirements of Sections 4-734. (H) , (J) , (N) , (0) , and (P) can be met. Construction of Lind Avenue South will provide the required access. All but the Public Works Department have approved the storm drainage plans. Certification regarding conformance with applicable pollution and emission regulations will occur three months after construction as a result of monitoring the site. The recommended fire suppression system will be installed. The normal inspection of the construction and building permit by the appropriate departments will achieve satisfactory compliance with Section 4-734. 3. Due to the existence of the Mobil Oil storage facility prior to enactment of Section 4-734, the proposed storage tank is the only portion of the facility that must technically conform to the requirements of that ordinance. 4. Adequate vegetation and security fencing exists around the proposed tank, except along the easterly side of the tank where the existing tanks are located,provided the existing vegetation remains as is. The proposed landscaping (Exhibit #8) along the northeasterly corner and northerly portion of the site should adequately provide the screening required for the proposal. Upon removal of the existing vegetation along the site perimeters to accommodate Lind Avenue South and/or Strander Boulevard, the need for additional landscaping and/or modifying the security fence should be evaluated by the Planning Department in cooperation with the applicant for a mutually agreed upon solution. It should be noted that it seems unreasonable to require full compliance with Section 4-734. (E) along the perimeter fence since this fence encompasses the total site, of which the proposed tank is a small part. The impact of the existing tanks east of the proposed tank seems to reduce the effectiveness any screening or fence modifications might have at the perimeter of the total site relative to the added tank. Although the facility might be nonconforming with regard to requirements of Section 4-734, it is unreasonable to impose the requirements of the ordinance retroactively upon the total site. 5. Required approvals of other agencies have been secured. Monitoring of the site for three months after construction is, the only requirement remaining to be accomplished. DECISION: Based upon the record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the decision of the Examiner to approve the Special Permit as submitted subject to: 1. Compliance with all of the requirements of other agencies relative to storm drainage, pollution and emission standards. Certification is to occur per Section 4-734. (P) .7 and other, applicable requirements. 2. Construction of a fire suppression system to consist of connecting the existing foam system to the proposed tank, installation of an automatic alarm system for the proposed tank, and connecting the existing and added fire alarm systems to the Valley Communications Center per approval of the Fire Department. 3. Construction of access to Lind Avenue South when the street is constructed per approval of the Public Works Department. 4. Compliance with the sound, liquid waste, light and glare, odor, emission and pollution standards of Section 4-734. I yyy v�• ' . G S•I i i M Q . 1• 1 y — 7 , " $_:_ -!:::: 11 W ObR •DO�a ITloh .GL� �n '— \� —.—.I ..— `"__..ILL.— — _ ' n - • < 0 . _ , oi • 6 t -1 G „�� WB7I J _ 1 7• _ „ Z I j '_ ` E .\4 • ____ .___....../_. —.--:. .:,____,, ..0 J 7 n F . i 9 UONArI I. i0 -P . . y E---. ro I N ,e . . .: /7/ . _ \ i - _ --r _lim.�- • • •.I III W —_r -- — — , 1\ 11 sorpecr �t�_ • • i_.._ r,==, ! 1 ! [ . . . _ • , , . :-- i__-_____T_--..141.-__, ..._. _. . ..____ ______:_- __T:.., ' I♦ I •D I •e ` W�_ 1 s -- I--r--r-' -'-r- 1 r— > -T —f"_-_l 7 7—l'- —T--T 1 I -_% I 1 .. .. SPECIAL PERMIT: ' MOBIL OIL CORPORATION , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT IN H-1 ZONE , File No. SP-066-77 ; property located within the existing Mobil Oil Tank Farm area situated approximately, 1 ,000 feet south of the intersection Of the future S . W. 23rd Street and Lind Avenue S . W. directly south of . the . Olympic Pipe Line facility . c APPLICANT MOBIL OIL CORPORATION TOTAL AREA . ±11 acres • • PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via .E: .Valley Highway and proposed S.W. 23rd Street HI- 1', Heavy Industry I EXISTING ZONING • ,I - _ EXISTING USE Petroleum storage facility. • PROPOSED USE Addition of 'a 50,000 barrel gasoline storage tank. _ 1 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN . Manufacturing Park COMMENTS .. I — ..,--• -• .• -- -- - -- • -,. _ - - .{. • .-. • • _____ . ..-. . • - - L,F� Gebf- R1veg pipeuNg- ,,. PAR-it CO. 5044e /f 1I , ,,NfIC FIFE uN1: co. � ' i 'D i z /G01VG0 ii rolq,;,/ II CI eN; II-- i, ,1 Q Lei .� \ .000 / piety OIL. CO. ; '. 1. 1 n i I GI NArU, AL L , I Z YE&rAr,onl 1 o 1 A ag0414; ?ARK co. v 61001 /40 ' /,/Irltstu v' GtAc1� ?ARp- GO• l .-•• BOULIWAN9 , ,r, _.,, 'nzcnj oseb 39!000 s- (101 0tJiVe. 6rtgr.AGO. fAr1K b s,Gi,4r.b cll.,/ ; 411-'T Aga . GLAC,EK pAEK CO. &I A CI J ! ?ARK CO. (7. 114 grOW'? S11,1A6thteoK DRA►16e G44?14•16i-/ v 01410 f 64OLPLEPFROM 5GAL • zca 4 � 00 JECr sire MOBIL OIL. CORP. Spe,u4,L. p ►rf No. • r'''` King County St f Washington• John D.Spellman, County Executive q Department of Public Works Jean L. DeSpain, Director ti; u 1//1/111/ ,'?� G b ; 900KingCountyAdminstration Building SeaSeattle,Washington 98104 HEC 1VED January 3 , 1978 CITY OF 'RENTOI ‘H AFdING EXAMINER • F E B 71078 F RFN PM ��,�IOI�D �o i i9il0olls12ili2i3i415i6 Mr . Duane Wegner RC , _ Department of Ecology C.) f ! Northwest Regional Office • 4350 150th Northeast JAN 6 1978 Redmond, Washington 98052 -o Dear Mr . Wegner : vG DEPP'�// We are enclosing a State Flood Control Zone application and plans submitted to this Office by Mobile Oil Company for the construction of a 50, 000 gallon bulk storage tank in Section 30, Township 23 • North, Range 5 East , W.M. We have reviewed the proposed construction and submit the following comments : • 1 . For compliance with the East Side Green River Watershed Project any structure within this • site must be flood proofed to elevation 14 .4 feet (Mean Sea Level Datum) . • It must be noted that until such time as the Green River Watershed Project is constructed to the extent that it would fully serve this property, flooding could occur at elevation 14 .4 feet and somewhat higher . 2. The existing. 100-year frequency flood plain according to the Soil Conservation Service ' s Flood Plain Study is 21. 8 feet (MSLD) at the subject site. The storage tanks are shown to be flood proofed to elevation 24 . 0 feet . However , the approval of this development on the basis of flood proofing to above the existing 100-year frequency flood plain along • • ;i.y1` M NO, 5f 7 7 . 'Mr . Duane Wegner 4 Page two Mobile Oil Co. ,, . January 3 , 1978 Ip . u with the approval ofl otherapplications will . • result in a higher elevation for the 100-year frequency flood'a, plain because of the reduction . in the storage. area for flood waters unless , improvements are made to provide' for discharge • of the flood waters from the flood plain. • . • • 1 VI 3 . Additional improvements to this site -will require • State Flood Control• Permits . io If you have any questions regarding the, above comments , please feel . free to contact Mr .. Larry Gibbons of this office on 344-3874 . . • �I � Very truly yours , - ' •• ,. III WILLIAM B. GILLESPIE Division Engineer • 'II Division of Hydraulics WBG ''' •LRG/SK/bb it . Enclosures : FCZA Plans ,li . • Topography map III'' . cc.: _/ Mr . Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director ; ' ' City of Renton "'I ;'ll ,J • bill . L . RECEIVED y' CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEB 71978 PRELIMINARY iREPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER AM PM 71819110111112a112e3141516 PUBLIC HEARING A FEBRUARY 7 , 1978 • APPLICANT : MOBIL Oi'IL CORPORATION EXHIBIT NO. 1 FILE NO . : SP-066-77 , SPECIAL PERMI-ME NO. 5/9— “ _ 7 7 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST : 'I Applicant requests the,, approval of the addition of a 50 , 000 barrel gasoline storage tank with an internal covered floating roof and a vapor recovery system as per Renton Bulk Storage regulations . Storage tank will be . within existing filled and. developed area . B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : ;'i Mobil Oil Corporation 2 . Applicant : Mobil Oil Corporation 3. Location : Approximately 1 , 000 feet south of intersection of future S .W . 23rd Street and Lind Avenue S . W. 4 . Legal Description :'i A detailed legal description is on file in the Renton Planning I Department. II� 5. Size of the Property : ± 11 acres . Via East Valley Highway and 6. Access : proposed S . W. 23rd . 7 . Existing Zoning : ! H-1 , Heavy Industry 8. Existing Zoning in, L-1 , Light Industry District the Area : M-P , Manuafacturing Park District G , General Classification District 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Manufacturing Park 10. Notification : I The applicant was notified in ii writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three (3 ) places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance . C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST : To allow the addition . of a 50, 000 barrel gasoline storage tank to the existing fill and diked area , together with the installation of a vapor recovery system to control hydrocarbon emissions per the City ' s Bulk Storage Ordinance . D . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The site was annexed into the City by Amended Ordinance #1928 dated December 22 , 1961 . On March 8, 1965 , the site was rezoned from G , General Classification District to H-1 , Heavy Industry district. it 11 III PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF FEBRUARY ! 7 , 1978 PAGE TWO RE: MOBIL OIL CORPORATION , SP-066-77 , SPECIAL PERMIT E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography : The site is level . 2. Soils : Urban land fill . 3 . Vegetation : The majority of the site consists of swamp grasses , scrub brush , and a small number of deciduous trees . 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation of the site provides a suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water: There are several portions of the site where natural water retention ponds have formed. Also, Springbrook Creek abuts the western boundary of the site. 6 . Land Use: The land is divided between heavy industrial use and land in the process of being prepared for development. F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS :: The area surrounding the site is primarily heavy industrial in character. G. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: ' A sixteen ( 16) inch water main exists along the north property line of the subject site . An eight (8) inch sewer main is located along East Valley Road east of the subject , site. An additional sewer main is planned as part of the Lind Avenue L . I . D . project to be constructed this summer. Storm drains will also be included as part of the Lind Avenue L. I . D. Storm drainage at the present time percolates into the ground within the diked area . Storm water runoff flows westward in the natural area owned by Mobil Oil Company and eventually into the Spring- brook Creek drainage channel . 2 . Fire Protection : ' Provided by the Renton Fire Department. The Fire Department has reviewed the application and approved it. A foam system is provided on site per code requirements . 3. Transit : Not applicable . 4 . Schools : No schools are located in close proximity to the site. 5. Parks : The subject site is near the City' s 20 acre wetland area and the Springbrook Channel greenbelt area . H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-713 (B) (4) , H-1 '1Heavy Industry District. 2. Section 4-734, Bulk Storage Facilities . I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE , COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY, DOCUMENTS : 1 . Renton Comprehensive Plan , Green River Valley , June 1976 . J . IMPACTS ON. NATURAL SYSTEMS : The addition of a new :tank within the existing filled and diked area , together with the installation of a vapor recovery system PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF FEBRUARY 7 , 1978 PAGE THREE RE : MOBIL OIL CORPORATION , SP-066-77 , SPECIAL PERMIT per the bulk storage regulations , will not impact the existing natural systems . The installation of additional landscape screening and the vapor recovery system may , in fact, result in some positive impacts . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : Not applicable . L . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : v Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , R. C . W. 43 . 21C, a Declaration of Non-signifance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Department of Ecology (lead agency for the subject proposal ) . This negative declaration was further based upon proper development procedures per the City ordinances and the provision of suitable landscape buffer, together with the preservation of existing natural areas around the entire site . (See attached negative declaration . ) M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : 1. A . copy of the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency review and approval of the proposed addition is attached . 2. A vicinity and site map are attached. N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency 2. State Department of Ecology 3 . King County Hydraulics Division 4. City of Renton Building. Division 5. City of Renton Engineering Division 6 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 7 . City of Renton Utilities Division 8. City of Renton Fire Department 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The proposed construction will be entirely within the exist- ing filled and diked area . An interior portion of the dike has been removed to provide spill protection meeting National Fire Protection Association Code (minimum holding capacity of 100% of the single largest tank) . The barrier required under Section 4-734. 0. 2 was omitted from the ordinance by the courts . 2. Section 4-734 (B ) . 3 establishes the responsibility to the applicant of proving compliance with the bulk storage regulations . 3. The proposed 50 ,000 barrel storage tank meets the maximum height of 40 feet established in Section 4-734 (C ) . 4. The proposed tank complies with the setback requirements of Section 4-734(D) . 5. The proposal complies with the landscaping requirements of the bulk storage regulations . The existing natural areas . west of the site and at the southeast corner are to be retained in a natural state to provide screening. At such PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF FEBRUARY 7 , 1978 PAGE FOUR RE: MOBIL OIL CORPORATION , SP-066-77 , SPECIAL PERMIT time as they are filled and/or developed, landscaping shall be installed per ordinance requirements . Additional land- scaping is proposed along the north property line and along the portions of the east property line which do not have existing natural trees and vegetation . The area south of the existing dike (constructed on the property line) is owned by Glacier Park Company and is proposed as the future location for Strander Boulevard. It is assumed this area will remain in a natural state until the proposed roadway is constructed. At such time , additional landscaping will be installed as part of the street improvements . Any special permit approval should be conditioned upon Plan- ning Department review and approval of landscape plans and preservation areas . 6. An existing eight (8) foot cyclone fence is located around the entire perimeter of the site . This must comply with the 80% opaque requirement of Section 4-734( E) 1 only along and in conjunction with those areas to be landscaped . At such time as natural vegetation is removed in other areas around the site perimeter, conformance to this requirement , will be necessary. 7 . Any further signing shall conform to the requirements of Section 4-734( F) . 8. Drainage facilities have been reviewed and approved by the Department of Ecology in conjunction with a National Pol - lutant Discharge Elimination System Waste Discharge Permit. Permit No. WA-000194-5 ( I ) was issued by the Department of Ecology on 7r subject to conditions . (See copy of at the p6rmit. ) Any special permit approval should also reference the conditions established in the NPDES permit. All storm drainage facilities for any site development shall also be subject to final Public Works Department approval . 9. Permits from Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency for construction of the vapor recovery system and the 50,000 barrel gasoline storage tank with Ultraflote Corporation floating roof were issued on November 8, 1977 , and Novem- ber 2 , 1978, respectively. The proposed facility must meet the ambient air quality standards specified in Regulation 1 of PSAPCA (4-734 ( I ) 1 ) . 10. __Section 4-734(P), also relating to control of air contani - nants , requires that the applicant provide an initial report that certifies compliance with the established standards . 11 . Section 4-734 (P ) 13 requires all existing facilities to comply with the emission standards of the ordinance . The proposed vapor recovery system and floating roofs are intended to meet this requirement. It will be necessary for the applicant to certify this once the facilities are installed and operational . Projected emissions calcula- tions have been provided with the application , which indi- cate hydrocarbon emissions below the 100 tons per year maximum allowed by Schedule 4-734( P) 1 . 12. The existing facility has an on-site fire suppression system. Any new construction must meet the requirements of 4-734 0. 4. (See Fire Department comments . ) 13. Access to the site is presently via a joint roadway with Olympic Pipe Line Company, which extends from the northeast PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF FEBRUARY 7, 1978 PAGE FIVE RE : MOBIL OIL CORPORATION , SP-066-77 , SPECIAL PERMIT corner of the Olympic Pipe Line site to East Valley Road. Although this does not meet the strict application of Section 4-734 (J ) 1 , a new access to be coordinated with the Lind Avenue street construction and indicated on the site plans will provide suitable access to the subject site. Proposed curb cuts and driveway widths shall be designed and approved as part of the Lind Avenue project per Public Works Department approval . 14. Sound levels appear to be within acceptable levels per State and City of Renton law. Enforcement of the maxi - mum noise level standards is by complaint only. 15. Liquid waste discharge must meet all State standards . See attached National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Waste Discharge Permit issued by the Department - of Ecology with various general and special conditions (Section 4-734(L ) ) . 16 . Although the proposed use would not by itself normally be considered consistent with the proposed land uses established in the Comprehensive Plan for the Valley area (manufacturing park) , it can be considered a reason- able addition to an existing facility in an existing previously established H- 1 Heavy Industry District. The fact that the applicant proposes to provide landscape screening around the site perimeter and/or preserve natural screening vegetation lends compatibility to certain elements of the Comprehensive Plan. P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the special permit for the 50,000 barrel petroleum storage tank, together with the installation of the vapor recovery system subject to: 1. Certification by the applicant that the facility meets all air emission standards established in Section 4-734(P ) as part of a report to be filed per 4-734(P) 7. 2. Compliance with the fire protection requirements of the Uniform Fire Code and NFPA 30 and Section 4-734(0)4. 3. Compliance with the conditions established within the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Waste Discharge Permit No. WA-000194-5 ( I ) issued by the Depart- ment of Ecology. 4. Compliance with the requirements of PSAPCA, Regulation I , air emission standards . 5. Compliance with any requirements established as part of the State Flood Zone Control Permit issued January 19 , 1978. 6. Landscaping shall be provided per the landscaping plan subject to final approval of the Planning Department. . Landscaping shall provide a suitable screening buffer, and planter areas shall be earth-bermed per Planning Department approval . Existing natural areas shall be retained in a natural state . If removed as part of future fill and/or development, suitable landscaping shall be provided by the applicant to bulk storage ordinance requirements . Assurance of landscaping (A bond shall be posted to insure landscape installation . ) installation and maintenance shall be provided per PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF FEBRUARY 7 , 1978 PAGE SIX RE : MOBIL OIL CORPORATION , SP-066-77 , SPECIAL PERMIT Section 4-734( E) ( 3) . Landscaping shall be provided along the south property line at such time as the natural vege- tation is removed and/or Strander Boulevard is constructed. Suitable agreement shall be established to allow the appli - cant to utilize City right-of-way for landscaping pur- `, poses as part of the design for Strander Boulevard. 7 . The existing cyclone fence surrounding the site perimeter shall be provided with screening inserts to provide an opaqueness to ordinance standards in those areas of the site not surrounded by existing natural vegetation . At such time as the natural vegetation is removed from other . perimeter areas , the fencing shall be appropriately con- verted to an 80% opaque screen together with the required landscaping. . 8. The proposed entrance roadway shall be coordinated and constructed with the Lind Avenue L . I . D. project . 9. Sound levels shall not exceed established State and City standards . 0 10. Drainage facilities shall be approved by the Public Works Department . 11 . The applicant shall provide certification of compliance with the dike requirements, of NFPA 30. 12. Compliance with light and glare requirements of Section 4-734 (M) . I'I , Th _C /��`�`1 -_r______V tt:tF_-_-�'Ii- - ---'>i---T{1--ig-- _-_-I 1---I--i r1.1 -_' N. ,r•ii -4--- O- -- -- -- ----i ll W--- 7r ; EADER D9UIITIO1. GLAIM -- �aa W• =I _ 3T.' eo IT a a[I 1 U d \ I ----- _-- — '79 . ^' __O \II B _ 7/ .__ �l. I) I I — - . I ' 77 B I G - 1 . W J l B m. . 1. ,l li 7i U rc � �. _ == l� • Q D I • E, i 1 0 I W MXI - .! ii \\\ i — OONATIQJac.:1 h • • a m CLA1F1 Np q� i 12 S M-p 1, 1i-- 6 III I . 6 . . . , \ 1 . .- • .rti i . . , . 2 . • . i 1 1 .. . . . il 1 s., • . . . • .• • . . r- IR 1., , i 4 s ' •. 1T H • I i Ieoll _r _ ..._1 • j _— I, I a z o �g ') ' ' . --1 . I. a --,--r- , , 1 ? ,•-ice-T--l--T—"T—( I 1 I fl [i . .. . ....... . . . , , . . . _, ..., . .. , .. . ., , . • - • ' SPECIAL PERMIT: • 1-s I; MOBIL OIL CORPORATION , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT IN H-1 ZONE , 1' File No . SP-066-77 ; property located within the existing Mobil Oil Tank '` Farm area situated approximately 1 ,000 feet south of the intersection 'SI of the future S . W. 23rd Street and Lind Avenue S . W. directly south of 4s the Olympic Pipe Line facility . I:4 APPLICANT MOBIL OIL CORPORATION TOTAL AREA ±11 acres I . PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via E. Valley Highway and proposed S.W. 23rd Street { EXISTING ZONING H- 1 , Heavy Industry 13 :f Petroleum storage facility. EXISTING USE ,f Addition of a 50,000 barrel gasoline storage tank. PROPOSED USE �.' COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing 1� �` COMMENTS -' 1'1 1 1g : . . . I' GD - 12,1vEK P ----- yAKK Co• �s 1e-4r ti� eel 1/APIC ?I PE unle Co. 11 a . 'COAX-0 II t 1 ( ® i --- ). ' II 1 I1 � ' , e %. i lio s 1 itil. �N eee /// / / / // . / /'// / //7//�//.l 5 ' 1 I4014 o: co. / 1/ / ®; 'I/ . v{ / I Il Z NAruI�4� I o/ V & r•,OA► 1 rA �� 000 LAci at ?ARK Co. % • 17 / 10 o O v ' 1 //,/ / //// ti/ /✓///,! cimcieg. 7ARK CA• , •pgcr-raaeb 501000 i- DESiGNa A airy . 61.A CiElt pAgx co. &I-A CV. pARIK Co. 1.i O.? ' 6111 570,4„spa°K D4'W'K'O. cktitnll L/ 61404beor a SCAL a 0 2.:5O 5U0JAcr $iik rIzza ______. Mo$1c.. Oil- CORP. 5peCIAL ref-Mir No. 5p-0449-71 i ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO • Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department Police Department Public Works Department 4.j Building Div . 041 Traffic Engineering Div : Engineering Div . �i Utilities Engineering Div . . FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) • MIG4 'LIl SUBJECT : Review of ECF- ? 7-77 ; Application No . : p-6) -77 Action Name : hjo t (o(L CO , .cj,�.� it U Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : 't J Department : • Comments : (;(2 r >.) C (Ae �Q,� � II Y`�r.�� r-zyie,L.Q -. ` stA 0 1 1 br‘ei. y-? ) • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ,'e ee� ' Comments : No Signature of Director or uthorized Repre entative Date 6=.76°_ • ; „„ REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : j-- Department : /I— I Comments NO _S.)„: -z z.e), /4 •7pc-:-t-• c-2- //e 7)/) • : 7' „v. Signature of i rector oY. Authorized Representati —fat( e REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : "Nsakl,a,— Comments : 9tkikk\ Ce:=0VAR\%1 (-1.5‘..NNA VWC*1°'abt:1) Signature of Di risori zed Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : N.01-4 it_ • Si gnature of Di r-Tc-Firi; or Authorized Representative Date , 7' • I 1 REVIEW' BY: OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : ' Department : . r, • Comments : • ig • nAt u r of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTE SCHEDULE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED j//7/77 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: REZONE MAJOR PLAT SITE _PPR UAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMI J) P-M.)t5L AL ea., WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT � � WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE ////6 77 fAs I2 -TO, $ W IT►U . SIGNATURE OR INITAL DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE ili) UILDING //•iy- 7 RAFFI C ENG. v //--/4=7 7 ENGINEERING 4/ i//j9/77 4t.____ FIRE t� iil5/'77 1 HEALT k.-7- 1/4-5TiIATIG /llif/77 I • REVIEWER ' S CO OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : ' — Clii 04 014 .,# l 9)11. JSL --f /per neeZs� 2G St Y,s 7 f•C /�'LJ*--, r� .s 5-p' ei — 73 ea) y. • a utir j r�ic.4ee e&-eie.�rr/,ig--- • PLEASE SIGN THE E . I ,W . : qic4411 l., .sM►-R-A I--,kN,;;,,,4„, - • • • ' �� ` STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 1 r = WASHINGTON 4350 150th Ave.N.E.,Redmond,Washington 96052 206,885•1900 Dixy Lee Ray Got.•ernor • January 19, 1978 • Mobil Oil Corporation 612 South Flower Street • Los Angeles, California 90017 Gentlemen: Enclosed are the original and one copy of Flood Control Zone Permit • No. 1-2772-2 for The purpose of construction of a,50,000 barrel' gasoline storage tank. • Please sign both copies on the reverse side as permittee, retain the original, and return the copy to this department. The permit does not become effective until said copy is received. The enclosed permit should not be considered a permit under the Shore- line Management Act of 1971. Sincerely, ROY C. BISHOP . Resource Management - RCB:jw • Enclosures • cc: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Dept. , Renton King County Hydraulics • RECEIVED o� 2 . JAN 18 19778 • 2��G DEPPR��� • _ PERMIT. , STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON • • • Permit is granted under provisions of Ch. 86.16 RCW, this 19.th day of Janaury to MOBIL OIL CORPORATION (Name of applicant) 612 South Flower Street, Los AngelQ.S....California..90.017 . • (Address) to construct and maintain 50,000 Barrel Gasoline .Storage Tank (Description of works) for the period , 19 to , 19 or in_perpetuity in MANNW4 Section 30 Township 23 N. Range...5..E.. W.M. Green River . on , which said works, structures and improvements are located within Green (Name or stream or flood plain affected) Flood Control Zone No 2 , all in accordance with Application No 2173 and plans attached thereto on file with the Department of Ecology, which application, with plans attached, is made a part hereof. • The work herein authorized may commence on or before the 19th day of January , 19 78 80 and19th January , 19 shall be completed on or before the day of , or before such dates as may be specified by any extensions granted. This permit is subject to the conditions printed on the reverse hereof. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. Tht Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Dept,Renton - f R King County HydraulicsERT K. MteORMECK': Regional Manager ECY 050-6 • • THIS PERMIT is subject to the following conditions, which are hereby accepted and agreed to by the permittee: I. This permit is granted under authority of Chapter 159, Session Laws of 1935. (Ch. 86.16 RCW.) 2. No property rights are granted herein, nor does this permit absolve permittee from liability [or any damages which may be suffered to life or to property, public or private, by reason of works, structures and improvements authorized hereunder. 3. This permit does not obviate the necessity of obtaining assent of the Federal Government in case of United St= .ns navigable waters. 4. The permittee shall remove, at his own expense, all falseworks, structures and materials incident to the consti uctioo of the work herein authorized. Works and structures erected under permit covering a specific period of time shall be removed by the permittee at his own expense upon the expiration of said period or at the expiration of any extension of time which may be granted. 5. Should permittee fail to remove, at the proper time,,materials; works and structures referred to under paragraph i. the Director reserves the right to have it done at the expense of the permittee. • 6. Any alteration of plans for works and structures made subsequent to the filing of application or the issuance of permit shall be subject to approval by the Director. 7. The Director shall be notified by the permittee of the completion of works under this permit in order that he may make final Inspection and give final approval. 8. This permit is subject to further special conditions as follows: • • • • • • • 9. This permit is accepted subject to provisions of law and regulations and conditions herein preset ibed. • • (Pernittee) • • By NOTICE OF COMPLETION - WARNING: Fegulation I, Section 6.09(a), requires that the owner or applicant notify the Agency of the completion of the work covered by the application and when its operation will begin. This form is provided for your convenience to assist you in complying with this part of the Regulation. APPLICANT or OWNER SECTION Mail to: Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Plan Review Section 410 West Harrison Street P.O. Box 9863 Seattle, Washington 98109 • Gentlemen: The project described below was completed on and will be in operation on Signature of Owner and/or Applicant Title Date OR AGENCY USE ONLY Notice of Construction No. 1769 Project Description: 50,000 BBL 95' Dia x 40' Unleaded Gasoline Storage Tank with Ul trafl ote Corporation floating Roof • Owner's Name Mobil Oil Corporation Location Approx_ 1,000 Feet South of Future Intersection of SW 23rd St, & Lind Ave, SW ❑ Inspector check ❑ Engineer and Inspector check • Follow-up (Estimated Completion Date Plus 7) Date Inspected Inspector REMARKS: • ❑ See Attachment � 1 FORM 43-1 t.t 5/76 • • • Yu t Sound-Air Po11ui_._ n • Notice of Control A 1769 gency Construction No. • HEREBY GRANTS Date • PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT, INSTALL,OR ESTABLISH 50,000 BBL 95' Dia x 401 Unleaded Gasoline Storage tank with Ultraflote Corporation Floating Roof A P Stephen C, Kelly, Atty, Mobil Oil Corporation NAME O NAM Watson RI Kelly vim IBM Building N 612 South Flower Street C STREET A E STREET • N Seattle, Washington 98101 R Ins Angeles, CA 90017 T CITY STATY ZIP CITY STATE ZIP • INSTALLATION ADDRESS • Renton Bulk Storage Terminal , 1,000 feet South of Intersection of SW 23rd St. & Lind Ave. SW STREET CITY STATE ZIP SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS GENERAL SPECIFIC Permission Is hereby granted as provided In Article 6 of Regulation I of the PSAPCA to the APPLICANT to install, alter, or establish the equipment, device, or process described hereon at the INSTALLATION ADDRESS In accordance with the plans and .• specifications on file in the ENGINEERING DIVISION of PSAPCA. This approval is not a waiver of liability for the infraction of Regulation I nor does It relieve the APPLICANT or OWNER of any requirements of other government agencies. C/440,LAAMtkt_6,C_W.-Lk A. R.Datnmkoehler —Reviewing ngineer Air Pollution Control Officer Form 50-118 Approved 11/73 NOTICE OF COMPLETION HWARNING • 0 • Regulation I, Section 6.09(a), requires that the owner or applicant notify the Agency of the completion of the work covered by the application and when its operation will begin. This form is provided for your convenience to assist you in complying with this part of the Regulation. APPLICANT or OWNER SECTION Mail to: Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Plan Review Section 410 West Harrison Street P.O. Box 9863 Seattle, Washington 98109 Gentlemen: The project described below was completed on and will be in operatiorn' I on Signature of Owner and/or Applicant Title Date FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Notice of Construction No. 1789 P'oject Description: Installation of Edwards Hydrocarbon Recovery Unit - VC 800 for control of hydrocarbon vapors from truck loading rack. • Owner's Name Mobil Oil Corporation Location Approx. 1000 ft. South of intersection of S.W. 23rd Strppr and i.ind Avenue S.W Renton, WA ❑ Inspector check J Engineer, A.J. Wright and Inspector check • Follow-up (Estimated Completion Date Plus 7) Date Inspected Inspector, REMARKS: ❑ See Attachment FORM 63.11.1 5/76 • • r 't 60uno TUI 1-43111.. Li • Notice of , . . • * Control Agency Construction No. 1789 HEREBY GRANTS Date NOV $ 1977 PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT,INSTALL,OR ESTABLISH Edwards Hydrocarbon Recovery Unit - VC 800 for control of hydrocarbon vapors from truck loading rack. - , • Stephen C. Kelly, Attorney A Watson & Kell P Y Mobil Oil Corporation P NAME 0 NAME • 1103 IBM Building w 612 South Flower .Street C STREET N E STREET N Seattle, WA 98101 • R Los Angeles, CA 90017 T CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP INSTALLATION ADDRESS Approximately 1000 ft. South- of Intersection of S.W. 23rd ,Street and Lind Avenue S.W. , Renton. , STREET CITY- STATE ZIP SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS . • GENERAL SPECIFIC Permission is hereby granted as provided in Article 6 of • Regulation I of the PSAPCA to the APPLICANT to install, alter, or establish the equipment, device, or process described hereon at the INSTALLATION . • ADDRESS In accordance with the plans and specifications on file in the ENGINEERING DIVISION ' • of PSAPCA. This approval is not a waiver of liability for - the infraction of Regulation I nor does It relieve the APPLICANT or OWNER of any requirements of other • government agencies. ...c<FisimA ALL (f_ I ""toki(„•4/1......: A. fight A. R.Dammkoehler _Reviewing Engineer Air Pollution Control Officer Form 50.118 Approved 11/73 i • • / 0 r R - . . . /did' C) Rfefll/eD o��� •IAN 20 19 rb : • . 92 _�� • �DcPAF.�/ 1 ) Page 2 of 7 ' Permit No. WA-000194-5 • SPECIAL CONDITIONS Sl. FINAL EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND A10NITORING REQUIREMENTS - After July 1, 1977,, permittee is authorized to discharge effluent, consisting of storm water, subject to the following limitations: EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS , MONITORING PEQUIRDMENTS Parameter Daily MaXimun Minimum Frequency Sample Type • Oil and No sample shall Twice monthly Grab Grease exceed 15 mg/1 when discharging • (mg/1) • NOTE: A sample for the purposes of determining the daily maximum is defined as the arithmetic average of a minimum of four grabs collected at equal intervals during a 45-minute period, not to commence during the first five minutes of treatment facility operation. However, one of the four grabs can be. omitted from the average, if unrepresentative. The omission of one grab as unrepresentative must be noted in the permittee's . monthly report. • Samples shall be taken immediately downstream of the effluent clearwell. Each grab shall be made with a one liter-sample container dipped entirely below the surface of the discharge stream. Inspection for visible oils in the effluent shall be made and xecorded daily when discharging. In the event that a visible sheen is present, reasonable methods, of elimination shall be applied prior to discharge. S2. MONITORING AND REPORTING In addition to the monitoring and reporting requirements set forth in preceding sections of the permit, permittee shall maintain a record of all data collected on the operation and efficiency of treatment and control facilities and the quantity and quality of the waste discharged and shall comply with the follow- ing: . • y, �A�_ Page 3 of 7 • , �� ham., - Permit No. WA-000194-5 a. Reporting • in A C' . Monitoring results shall be reported to the Northwest Regional Office of the Department of Ecology on a monthly basis. Monitoring results obtained • ' during the previous six months shall be summarized and reported on a Dis- charge Monitoring Report Form (EPA No. 3320-1) submitted no later than the 15th day of the month following the completed reporting period. Monitor- ' ing -shall be started 30 days .follow ng the effective date of this permit, • ' and the first EPA No. 3320-1 report is due six months thereafter. The- EPA report shall be sent to the Northwest Regional Office of the Department of Ecology. pLT rC,v,,,a oKe' L;., c.:,//J b. Records Retention 1 • • The permittee shall .retain for a minimum of three years all records of monitoring activities and results ncluding all reports of recordings from continuous monitoring instrumentation. This period of retention shall be extended during'the course of. any unresolved litigation regarding the dischak. rge of pollutants by.,the. permittee..or :when .requested by the Director. c. Recording of Results - . The permittee shall record each measurement .or sample taken pursuant to the 1 ' requirements of this,permit for..the following information: (1) the date, exact place, and' time of sampling; (2) the dates the analyses were performed; • ' . • ' (3) who performed the analyses; (4) the analytical techniques or methods . used; and (5) the results of all analyses. • . : . ' . ' d. Representative Sampling . . . Samplings and measurements. taken to meet. the.requirements of this condition shall be representative of the volume and nature of the monitored discharge. e. Test Procedures • { - - ''All sampling and..analytical methods used to meet the monitoring requirements specified in .this permit shall, unless approved otherwise in Writing by the . Department, conform to the Guidelines Establishing Test. Procedures for the ' Analysis of Pollutants, contained n 40 CFR Part 136, as published in the led ral Register on bctober 16, 1973, or the latest .revision thereof,-which references the following publications: Page 6 of 7 • Permit No. WA-000194-5 • GENERAL CONDITIONS G1. All discharges and activities authorized herein shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of this permit. The discharge of any pollutant more frequently than or at a level in excess of that identified and authorized by this permit shall constitute a violation of the terms and conditions of this permit. G2. Whenever a facility expansion is anticipated which will result in a new or in- creased discharge, or which will cause any of the conditions of this permit to be exceeded, a new.application must be submitted together with the necessary reports and engineering plans for the proposed changes. No change shall be made until plans have been approved and a new permit or permit modification has been issued. G3. The diversion or bypass of any discharge from the treatment works by the per- • Puttee is prohibited, except (a) where unavoidable to prevent loss of life or severe property damage, or (b) where excessive storm drainage or runoff would damage any facilities necessary for compliance with the terms and con- ditions of this permit. The permittee shall immediately notify the Depart- ment of each such diversion or bypass in accordance with the procedure spe- • cified in Condition G4. G4. In the event the permittee is unable to comply with any of the conditions of this permit, the permittee shall: • a. Immediately take action to stop, contain, and clean up the unauthorized discharges and correct the problem. • b. .Immediately notify the Department by telephone so that an investigation can be made to evaluate the impact and the corrective.actions taken and determine if additional action should be taken. • - • c. Submit a detailed written report to the Department describing the break- down, the actual quantity and quality of resulting waste discharges, cor- • restive action taken, steps taken to prevent a.recurrence, and any other pertinent information. • Compliance with these requirements does not relieve the permittee from respon- sibility tovaintain continuous compliance with the conditions of this permit or the resulting liability for failure to comply. The Department of Ecology • will take into consideration this information submitted by the permittee in exercising its discretionary authority for enforcement purposes. Notification received pursuant to this section, or information obtained by the exploitation of such notification shall not ;be used against permittee in any criminal case. 7 . Page 5 of 7 • Permit No. . WA-000194-5 • j. Cleanup and containment materials such as sand and sorbents, etc. , shall be readily available in the event of a spill. This material should bv. • used in conjunction with a contingency plan listing emergency telephone numbers and procedures. . k. The use of oil dispersant chemicals is strictly prohibited. Any emergency use of these, materials must be authorized by the' Department of Ecology. S6. OTHER REQUIREMENTS • • a. Sanitary wastes are to be disposed of in accordance with the recommenda- tions of the Seattle-King County Health Department. b. The installation, construction and maintenance of on-site sewage disposal systems shall meet the regulations of the Seattle-King County Heal.h De- partment. c. All washing operations utilizing chemicals shall be conducted in an es- tablished area that drains to an approved oil separator. This oil sepa- rator effluent shall be discharged into an approved drainfield that is isolated from the sanitary disposal system. This effluent shall be dis- charged to the sanitary sewer within thirty (30) days after one becomes • • available. . - • Page 7 of 7 • Permit No. " WA-000194-5 ' GS. The permittee shall 'at all times maintain in good working order and efficiently operate all treatment or control facilities or systems installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. • Gh. After notice and opportunity for a hearing, this permit may be modified, sus- pended or revoked in whole or' in part during its term for cause including, but not limited to the following: a. Violation of any terms or conditions of this permit or any applicable rule, •• standard, or order of the Department; • b. Obtaining this permit by misrepresentation or failure to disclose fully all relevant facts; c. A change in the condition of the receiving waters or any other condi- • tion that requires either a temporary or permanent reduction or elim- ination of the authorized discharge. • G7. The permittee shall, at all reasonable times, allow authorized representa- tives of the Department: • 7P7 "Ns ` a. To enter upon the permittee's premises for the purpose of inspecting ' :! ah a and investigating conditions relating to the pollution 'of, or possible ;��oJ c6/l G� pollution of, any of the waters of the state, or for the purpose of tf1"' l • investigating compliance with any of the terms of this permit; • i%/ b. TO-have access to and copy any records required to be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit; !.,;,11:0' c. To inspect any monitoring equipment or monitoring method required by this permit; or, • d. To sample any discharge of pollutants. • G8. If a toxic effluent standard or prohibition (including any schedule of com- pliance specified in such effluent standard or prohibition) is established , • under Section 307 (a) of the Federal Act for a toxic pollutant which is pre- .. sent in the discharge ,authorized herein and such standard or prohibition is more stringent than any limitation upon such pollutant in this permit, this permit shall be revised or modified in accordance with the toxic effluent standard or prohibition and the permittee shall be so notified. Section 307 (a) requires that the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall promulgate effluent standards (or prohibition) for toxic pollutants which he has listed as such. • G9. Nothing in this permit shall be construed as excusing the permittee from com- pliance with any applicable Federal, State, or local statutes, ordinances, or regulations. . 1 �• El • `fi p r ``A•‘• • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT z o WARREN C GONNASON, P.E • DIRECTOR p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 206 235•1569 • Oeo SEPIt August 9, 1977 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR Watson, Kelly &;Holcomb 1103 IBM Building Seattle, Washington 98101 Attention: Mr. Stephen C. Kelly Subject: Proposed Edwards Hydro Carbon Vapor Recovery Unit to be Installedlby Mobil Oil Corporation Gentlemen: In response to your letter of July 28, 1977, we find the unit proposed acceptable. • However, it will be the responsibility of Mobil Oil to install a unit capable of meeting the emission standards as established by ordinance and having this certified by a qualified engineer. Sincerely, • Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. Public Works Director WCG/RGN/mp • cc: PlanningDepartment p t I 6U- is, i U AUG y e �c 1 l v / -gA 41/ P. r • RECEII �� CITY OF RENTON \ Li AUG ftI977 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT / FOR OFF 0 � File No . S - Date Rec' d AttO A U' / 977 Application Fee $ ' Receipt No . !+ z� 41C • - Environmental Review Fee $ ;APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1 . Name_Mobil Oil Corporation Phone 206/624-7171 Address Attn: Stephen C. Kelly, 1103 IBM Bldg. , Seattle, Wa. 98101 2 . Property location Approximately 1000 Ft. South of intersection of future SW 23 St. and Lind Ave. S.W. ' . 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) See Attachment. I - • • • i 4 . Number of acres or square feet 11.12 Present Zoning H-1 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Addition of one 50,000 BBL. • gasoline stoorage tank with internal covered floating rnnf 6 ., The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , - Scale existing structures , easements , and other .factors limiting development) 1" =-10 ' or 20 ' B, Parking ,• landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) . E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining ,. Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307 . 5 in addition to the above. 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER' S ACTION: Date Approved Date Denied • Date Appealed Appeal Action . . • Remarks • • • • \ • Planning Dept. 1 ` • Y ' I Parcel 1 The following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: That portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 30 Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 30; thence South 0°49'10" West, along the West line of said Section 30, a distance of 180.01 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to and 180 feet Southerly, measured at right angles to the North line of said Section 30; thence South 89"52'01" East, parallel with said North line, 20.00 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to and 20 feet Easterly, measured at right angles to the West line of said Section 30; thence South 0°49'10" West along said parallel line 554.32 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 88°24'48" East a dis- tance of 903.21 feet to a point on a line 70 feet Westerly, measured at right angles to the East line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence Souht 1°35'12" West, parallel to said East line,217.71 feet to a point of curvature of a curve to the right of radius 344.265 feet; thence Southwesterly along said curve 369.79 feet to a point from which the center of the circle of said curve bears South 26°52'12" East; thence North 88°24'48" West 716.02 feet to a point on a line parallel to and 20 feet easterly of, measured at right angles to the West line of said Section 30; thence North 0°49'10" East along said parallel line, 520.05 feet to the True Point of Beginning and containing in all 10.33 acres more or less. Parcel 2 The following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: That portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 30; thence South 0°49'10" West, along the west line of said Section 30, a distance of 180.01 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to and 180 feet southerly, measured at right angles to the north line of said Section 30; thence South 89°52'01" East, parallel with said north line, 20.00 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to and 20 feet easterly, measured at right angles to the west line of said Section 30; thence South 89°52'O1" East, parallel and 180 feet southerly of the north line of said section, a distance of 910.93 feet to ,a point on a line 70 feet westerly, measured at right angles to the east line of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter, thence South 1°35'12" West, parallel to said east line, 547.01 feet to the true point of beginning; thence South 1°35'12" West to a point of curvature of a curve to the right of radius 344.265 feet; thence southwesterly along said curve 369.79 feet to a point from which the center of the circle of said curve bears North 26°52'12" West; thence South 88°24'48" East along a line to a point of intersection with a line 40 feet westerly measured at right angles to the east line of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of said section; thence north along said line 550.38 feet, thence at right angles westerly 30.00 feet to the true point of beginning, containing 0.79 acres more or less. -2- • 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : On Lind Ave. S .W. approximately 1, 000 ' South of S.W. 23rd St. and-�=�/4 mimes—soii of the City of Renton, consisting of 11 a are.s-.-o.fLandi_ • 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : September, 1978 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : Dept- of__Ecology,. P.uge._.S.nund._Air P llution C'son.ttoL_Agen.cy, and City of Renton. • 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or. further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: installation of a vapn.r_rec.o.vpry_unit_ for the. ,gasnl i ne.:loading facilities. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: __No . 12 . Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed , but is expected to be filed at some future date , describe the nature of such application form: Environmental check list for a vapor recovery, unit. • • II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) ( 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: • • (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? }�_ YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil ? - YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief . features? Xg 1TES MAYBE NO (d) The destruction , covering or 'modification of any unique geologic or 'physical features? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , • either on or off the site? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands ,• or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay , inlet or lake? X YES MAYBE' NO. Explanation: (b) Di eruptions• connected with erection of a petroleum storage tank. / CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON •� O� �ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM � REEII��D�jo. • '2 • AUG • 8 1977 , • FOR OFFICE USE ONLY �9iL ,+ �"" . •:ic, Application No. _07'- L.'_ _�.lz._ — --- — 2/NC' DEPP�•c Environmental Checklist No. .-',per- =_� ._ _77 PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date : ElDeclaration of Significance - Declaration of Significance IDDeclaration of Non-Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance , COMMENTS : ---____- - - - ---,_—. . . . . • Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, .RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their , own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires 'tha't'an EIS be prepared for all major .actions significantly affecting the quality of 'the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine' whether or not a proposal is such a major action. , Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the . information . . presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use• adrlitional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide . Complete answers to these questions now will help all . agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out- unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for. which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is' completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This 'will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to -complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : Ihis is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in' the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions -may' not •apply to'. your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and' continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1 . BACKGROUND . - • • ' 1 . Name .of Proponent Mobil Oil Corporation_- Z. Address and phone number of Proponent : ' 612 South Flower Street, L. A. , Cal. 90017 213/683-6335 Stephen C. Kelly, -Attorney for Petition, 1103 'IBM Bldg. Seattle, WA. ', 98101 206/624-7371 • 3. Date Checklist submitted ' 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton . 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: •• . . Install 50, 000-barrel gasoline storage tank. Renton Terminal • 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give' an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Tank to hP internal_covered floating roof typP 'rontructed . ' • according to American Petroleum Institute specification 650. Tank to be diked and protected according to. recommendations of—the_National Fire Protection Association. NQ_ 30_ Tank _ • will receive and store gasoline for distribution to 'customers. . 1 4- • (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: - (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish , benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? - X YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO . (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , ----or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? V YES MAYBE NO - (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? y'- YES MAYBE Ni) Explanation: (6) noise . Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? - _ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: During construction phase on a temporary basis within normal business hers• --- -- - - - -- (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal procuce new light or glare? X - - YES MAYBE NO Ex lanation : • (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in . the alteration of the present or planned land use of ar area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation : (9) Natural Resources . will tne proposal result in : - (a) -Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO - (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? . X YES MAYBE NO • Explanation : (a) irectly, -addjtio.na .._elec,tric 1 energy k=;l_1 he nja ded for pumping. __ _ --------- -- — ( 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal invole a risk of an explosion or the release of nazardous substances (including , but not limited to , oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? _ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: There is very_ small inherent risk that is present in handling, Storage and transportation of petroleum products. • ( 11) Population . Will the proposal alter tne location , aistri- bution , density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? - - - - - - X YE— Mr,�B4 NO Explanation: - F - • (2) Air. Wi.11 .the proposal result in: • (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YES MAYBE NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X• YES - MAYBE NO_ (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature , or any change in climate , either locally or , regionally? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation : (a) There will be some hydrocarbon emissions but only those consistent with the latest tank building technology including a floating roof with the best seal technology. (3) Water. Wi1,1 the proposal result in : • (a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE NO • (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? - X YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration • surface water quality, including but not limited to ' temperature , dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE NO . (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? - .. X YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through _ interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through • ' direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate , - • phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available _ for public water supplies? X • YES MAYBE NO Explanation : (4) Flora. Will the proposal result -in : (a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora ( including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , • microflora and .aquatic plants)? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or • endangered species of flora? X YES ,MAYBE NO • (c) Introduction of new species__of flora into an area, or _• in a- barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? - X YES MAYBE NO (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? - _ YES MAYBE NO' , Explanation: _ • -6- . • (d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE -NiO (e) Storm water drainage? X. YES MATBE W (f) Solid waste and disposal? _ X_ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: - (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? - x YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: — - (18) Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? x • YES . MAYBE NO Explanation: ( 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality o-r quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical . Will -the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical _ site , structure , object or building? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • SIGNATURE I , the undersigned', state that to the best of my knowledge the, above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: \:, . signed) — —" • • - Stephen C. Kelly 'name printed) `-- ---- ------ • City of Renton - Planning Department 5-76 -5- ( 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or create a demand for additional housing? YE'S MAYBE NO Explanation: ( 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE ,NO , ('b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? X ' YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? - X YES MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns .of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X YES MAYBE NO • (e) Alterations to waterborne., rail, or air traffic? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (a.) Constriirtion vahir'los anrd trmffir will hP a011rat-ed_ during construction and additional transportation of petroleum products will' increase consistent with demand. (14) Public Services . Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services _ in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? X .YES MAYBE NO. (b) Police protection? X YES, MAYBE NO • ' (c) Schools? I X____ YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities ,' including roads? ' X YES ' MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? • - YES MAYbE NO Explanation :' . • (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in : (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X . -. YES MAYBE N Explanation: (b) Incremental use of fossil fuels and electric energy _ consistent with demands for petroleum products. (1,6) Utilities. Will the proposal -result in a need for new ' systems , or alterations to the following utilities : - (a) Power or natural gas? YES " MAYBE NO (b) - Communications systems? qq YES MAYBE df0 (c) Water? . YES MAYBE NO '99 o16iL, O.L. 74' gA4. ',q Pam. r -All re? 4445/9 -sT- )1 ./ 61/4 6177 ( ,✓nrui9 _ 6Ad/5.57 S 2Zo /V7A1 P C74oGi '6 7w2WWP6'r R VP / 2 . 2 pSi /cZ Use Lieguio 570 i4-E MeIthNT = 52, / ° Pe2 'PZI �Y, %✓/2 612 la It)/4/re wez-Deo / I r-/21V4 Z. 6)V6zS < SI (Iv6 r CAP, I ° i / 5"?'6 oo ,fie� /o� �' x -� '44'2 :4 oa K 93171 l0 27 /00 of 7/,51.? K it 7 50, o00 1 x 40' (Pi - ) 2, /AN�4 L.ossc-' 13,1-seo , OA( /FP/ 2s79 6'76) D I,,$'/ 7 ) 7vei s � P (PE2 ,q P/ z.S77 kv/4 uh#40) v.7, 0, 7= Z,6 4- o,o4S D'PS(,8)CZ 64K;q) P C6z. �¢,7-P = :S )-a8oz G 3 . No. �/ p /. " LIC / /OS /0;77 93 93 g97 7 G ' 0S. 52. so 3 r3 .`Y2 . . 44;15S 6A4‘S5, 42Cf%-ipi N/?Eoo2r) .5,0#/C�.9C., €(D /Z Sk ¢Z x, 303 132 THY _ 44" lri.4,,i.y roI4 ``67. 6/29/77 nc_c_o w' '3LC Lass /00 rpy (545co (9,., i17z Alc,q 6 s) 7 Nr/5,4-erE ess 3 z G 8 MRx. LoRL/.mac? LOSS G 2Zo A4'I Cod q[.L 6 c t).9-l3G e //wiz I3EGO Li to Y r ..� •8 x 2ob0 _ o. 6.4 `oao ZZox /O G CfAG. 6; / P/Z/Cie-24-r/e2,V 6i.[/r OPER.4r' A r M'Ax• Zco ivoetiy�2 /76/4p, �Sy gPP(.G/�ar .S/vt-ouLD ,gPPx. 2 ,7% ✓vauN1t our NyQ2oc/426oNJ. AWA/ o, 9 !✓fui/c./* So o,%c (o.S"= .S8 * Mfv/c./ 74-5S/4 D ` (a / Aroz.. air. Our O.D Z7 /4410••°A I CirzvwTk x .S8%oG z Oi 7000 GAz. `©d 0 644. 7,S C7 44./ 6 .: g'-s <oN f-Pi 2 S7T(970 'o FZ leNr TeR vFi L vari,5 /tir rA,-/ S ,' -f D Q PeT A-T-i0467 I 7- @ iF/uEN C Y j ,1./©r /OD T'P . . ?yr,. c7 z' 7 7-?, / 7/0—Z 0 j, ,) ,' 7YOJ-^7 . o 11'`;;-) city. :5 •C les — A (17-//NI 77,7r; r7 S -21 eft t-.7/71 . / 2/ --if /./ ( • . ( ,f-5/;" ?e..Z. '7 77 - 7 1-x.. ) /I-2_SS 21-_,--- ,/c-1 7JOcJJ4 /)?,' (l (- •• -Lz.; 7 • ) • 77/ . (-7/ / • 1., " ! • it , , RAINPROOF , AERODYNAMICALLY DESIGNED RAINPROOF 1 O' (254 MM) D IA. —?--- COMBINATION VENT/INSPECTION HATCH STEEL CENTER VENT WITH ' WITH ALUMINUM BIRD SCREENING ALUMINUM CAP & BIRD SCREEN AREA = 2 SQ.FT. (0.186S(a.METERS) i Ij . TANK ROOF. • `\ . I , WELDED HOOP MADE FROM FIVE HOLD ROOF RAFTER O 12"X3/16" (38 x 5 MM)BAR DOWN BOLTS `` ROLLED TO 21 " (533 MM) pER VENT ,_ ______--1L D I A .ETER _ 1 I I-4----- „ I E20 (508 MM) O I AMETER 1 OPENING IN ROOF • i ROOF SUPPORT COLUMN- \ t 1 COVER TO SHELL SEAL ' ' COLUMN WELL • \ ' ! AND COVER ! . DECK' SKIN ' I i CLAMP BEAM DECK SKIN� 1 ��. _ _ —.1 ', I . LIQUID ! - = �� LEVEL I ir' '' 1- I / \ II I iL.7.. C -- mil .. 1 r ..." • ij f . . _ _� /'V RIM FLOTATIiON' �Y — /�l -1 �. TANK TUBES (HIDDEN) TUBE SADDLE RIM PLATE i1 AND STRAP SHELL I•, if • ��WELL PROJECTS �; SEE NOTES 1 .2.&3 1, 4" TO 5" (102 DRAWING 20101 TO 127 MM) INTO 1 I THE PRODUCT. - - - - - - - MA I, N FLOTATION TUBES SEE NOTE 1 9 DRAWING 20101 SHELL BRACKETS 1,1 FIXED LEG 1/4MV ' - 1 DRAINAGE NOTCH I - i if *U.S.PATENT NO. 3861555 OTHER U.S.AND FOREIGN PATENTS PENDING .� 44. ULTRAFLOTE RAFLOTE CORPORATION �o��,�. H. Nees $ GENERAL ELEVATION, FIXED LEG oZ Zia Er ..t '` i FOR ULTRAFLOTE* COVER fib ` -010 i� �� 42c"51 0THIS DRAWING IS THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF ULTRAFLOTE CORPORATION. ITS ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES AN AGREE- MENT THAT IT SHALL BE TREATED AS A STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT AND IS TO BE RETURNED UPON REQUEST Mb t AND IS NOT TO BEii'COMMUNICIAT ED.DISCLOSED.OR COPIED EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY ULTRAFLOTE itt STAGE® CORPORATION. i BY HAN I DATE 4/7/72 I REV. 2/1 2/75 I DWG. NO. 20099 , . 1 I RAINPROOF , AERODYNAMI CALLjY DESIGNED RAINPROOF , 10" (254 MM) COMBINATION VENT / iNSPEO-T.ION HATCH DIA, STEEL CENTER VENT 1.WITH ALUMINUM BIRD SCREEN�ING. I W/ ALUMINUM CAP AND BIRD • AREA = 2 SQ.FT; (0.186 SQ. METEItt) SCREENING. V I I TANK ROOF• 0 P . 1 , i \ j WELDED HOOP MADE FROM .,„__, \\ 1 1/2" x 3/16" (38. ) \ 5 MM) BAR ROLLED TO , FIVE HOLD DOWN \\ 21 " (533 MM) DIA. . BOLTS PER VENT \ V �` A _ ROOF RAFTER H ••••---------... upp______T--...1,111 . 0 0 20" (508 MM) OIA, OPENING ROOF SUPORT COLUMN- OPTIONAL 'ADJUSTABLE _ LEG ASSEMBLY I ''i COLUMN WELL-\ :. EcCOVER TO SHE;,LL SEAL AND COVER DECK SKIN CLAMP BEAM DECK SKIN \ LIQUID N _ i i:;;;: LEVEL Q� i I' •777----=-- ' ii".---• f I . i : i . RIM FLOTATION TUBE • - IM PLATE (PARTIALLY HIDDEN) • SEE NOTE I WELL AND LEG HOUSING 1 . 2, & 3 TUBE SADDLE AND STRAP PROJECT I" TO 5" DRAW I NG I (102 TO 127 MM) • 20101 MAIN 'FLOTATION TUBES INTO THE PRODUCT FOR /TANK I! A POSITIVE SEAL. 1/� SHELL DRA 1 NAGS NOONSEE NOTE -1 DWG„ 201 01 • l "U.SSPATENT N0. 386t355 OTHER U.S.ANO FOREIGN PATENTS PENDING • fESSI U.L TR `k'. FLUTE CORD® ', AT ION ��10 Oyq • �``�SE ., a\,\- . NFi, 3%,t GENERAL E,1 .LEVATION, OPTIONAL ADJUSTABLE LEG c '� ( ;,, , o ;,I j FOR ULTRAFLOTE*. COWER ___ , fi 42251 (`� YIDS DRAWING IS TN.EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OP ULTRAYLOTt CORPORATION. ITC ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES AN \ % MENT THAT IT SHALL SE TRSATEO AS A STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT AND IS TO SE RETURNED UPON NEOUEST O AND IS NOT TO SE 1 .DISC1AKO,OR COPIED EXCEPT A.ZX►NESSLY AUTHORIZED IN WRITING■Y ULTRA FLOTR .`NE Pa �` CORPORATION. ,1 i MY HAN 1 DAT< 1'/7/72 I REV. 2/12/75 'ma. No., 20100 . 11 l i COVER TO SHELL SEAL SUITABLE FOR INTENDED TANK SERVICE :::: I53N (08MM) SK1IN RIM PLATE 1 _s ►^g= - PROJECTS (102 To fr N 40: 127 MM) INTO THE SKIN CLAMP BEAM ASSEMBLY SEE NOTE 3 PRODUCT FOR LIQUID A POSITIVE MINIMUM THICKNESS OF RIM PLATE = 0.080"(2 MM) LEVEL SEAL. SEE NOTE 1 - NOTES•• — RIM SPACE 1.— This projection of the ULTRAFLOTE*Cover into the product forms a liquid seal to 7"ATOE8N %. PI positively trap the saturated vapor under (178 TO 203 MM) the cover. Any other cover, whether contact - or non-contact, without this, required projection RAMP EDGE into the product will suffer) reduced efficiency SEE NOTE 2 and also hazardous operation as a result of t the following conditions: A. Seal friction can raise the rim plate or the entire cover during withdrawal enough to allow vapor to escape and!expose liquid surface. Seal friction during fill can depress a shallow rim or this cover allowing product to flow onto the cover. B. Atmospheric low pressure cells cause any trapped vapor to expand and escape. C. Differential thermal expansion of the cover structure causes out of plane warpage thereby raising or lowering sections of the cover again allowing vapor to escape. D. Diurnal thermal cycles from solar radiation causes expansion and contraction of any trapped vapor thus raising and, lowering the cover with the same results. (The conditions described inl'C and D are a primary cause of the reduced efficiency experienced with sandwich type covers and other contact covers.) E. Insufficient vapor capacity under the cover or shallow rim plates or covers with no projecting rim plates prevents the containment of vapor slugs or entrained vapor in the fill stream which will "burp" past the cover edge. The optimum design of theALTRAFLOTICover allows the vapor space to contain any vapor volume changes and then return to a state of equilibrium without "burping" and without creating any other hazardous condition. 2. Ramp edges are required on rim plates to preclude the possibility of damage to the cover should the rim plate contact the tank shell. A straight rim plate would hang up on welds, rivets, .plate offsets, burrs, etc. that normally occur on tank shells. 3. The rounded edges of rim plates, precludes the possibility of tearing the deck skins from any loading experienced, by the cover. I. *U.S.PATENT No. 3861555 OTHER U.S.AND FOREIGN PATENTS PENDING ,,,�r --- _ U RAF LOT E CORPORAT [0 ``/ I j�NCAIT[RtD\ O ` , I's, c,/`PROFCOSIONAL',�\1` ,� R I Al PLATE AND SEAL DETA I LS 1�i ARDELL H. NELSON —+o ' FOR ULTRAFLOTE* COVER �� EN:INELR II `�4� `14 THIS DRAWING IS.TINE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTT OF ULTRAFLOTE CORPORATION. ITS ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES AN AGREE- L F� Ns.11811-E Vim// MENT THAT IT SHALL SE TREATED AS A STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT AND IS TO SC RETURNED UPON REQUEST A, �. AND IS NOT TO St I .DISCLOSED.OR COPIED!INCEPT AS IZED IN WRITING tT ULTRAFLOTE 4��S Y 1'-j/r< CORPORATION.J1 ' �iIi%S P� e� y r� 201 01 ■Y HAN I DATE �/(I(2 I REV. 2/1 2/75 I DWG. NO. J, I C • • 1 1 - I' INGE ASSEMBLY EDGE RAMP (PLATED STEEL) ii HATCH COVER . i I 1/8" (3 2 0.023"(C.584 MM) .; MM) D IAIYiETER '� _ DECK SKIN STAINLESS STEEL GROUND CABLE . \ .:. f . ( 32" (812-.8 MM) SQUARE ACCESS HATCH AND NECK y , `LIQUID LEVEL / . q ;I WELL PRO.IECTS INTO PRODUCT • 4" TO 5"' '102 TO ;,127 UM) FOR A POSITIVE SEAL SEE NOTE 1 ON DWG 20101 • \\ NOTES 1 1 • TWO 1 1/2" C38 MN') SQUARE HOLLOW BEAMS SUPPORT THE ACCESS HATCH FROM ADJACENT CLAMP BEAMS TO RELIEVE THE DECK (SKIN OF STRESS AND INSURE ALIGNMENT . 2. MINIMUM THICKNESS OF COVER , NECK , AND WELL IS 0.080" (24MM) , 3. ALL MATERIALS ALUMINUM UNLESS NOTED, *U.S.PATENT NO.' 3861555 OTHER IU.,S.AND FOREIGN PATENTS PENDING , • . ULTRAFLOTE CORPORATION /.�P��F V��'�D `' o��� �' Nf�� y� I ACCESS HATCH DETAILS oy No. 2689 * i FOR ULTRAFLOTE* COVER lb-4` Pe 1., .1� THIS DRAWING Is,TNa EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OP uvro YLOYit CobiroRAYION. ITS ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES AN AGREE- ` MINT THAT IT SHALL EX TREATED AS A STRICTLY CONPIDENTIAL DOCUMENT AND IS TO Et RETURNED UPON REQUEST F� � ulONAL E�' AND IS NOT TO 1111S C ICATED.DISCLOSED.OR COPIED EXCEPT AS'EA oR1:ED IN WRITING BY UL LOTC .CORPORATION. 1 , ■THAN JDATt4/ /(2 [ REV. 2/12/75 IDWG- NO. 20102 AAA , I . iI • • -- j . . I• CURVATURE OF FLARED FITTINGS PRECLUDES THE POSSIBILITY OF SAMPLE BOTTLES SNAGGING OR , CATCHING ON THE SAMPLE WELL. • • di . 16" DIA. X 10" DIA. x 4 1 /2" (406.4 x 254 x 114.3 MM) HIGH FLARED FITTING . .14" x 14" x 0.080" (355.6 x 355.6 x 2 MM) . BOLTING FLANGES TOP AND BOTTOM ////DECK SKIN \k ' 14" x 14" x 0.25" 10" (254 MM) DIA. PIPE (355.6 x 355.6 x 6.4 MM) DIAPHRAM WITH 8 RADIAL SLITS FOR SAMPLING OR GAGING _ ii III „i LIQUID SURFACE • 16" DIA. X 10" CIA. x 4 1/2" NOTE. (406.4 x 154 x• 114.3 Mal) li war) 1/2" (38 MM) SQUARE HOLLOW - HIGH FLARED FITTING PROJECTS BEAMS SUPPORT THE SAMPLE WELL FROM 4" TO 5" (102 TO 127 MM) ; ' ADJACENT CLAMP BEAMS TO RELIEVE' INTO THE PRODUCT FOR A II THE ' CECK SKIN OF STRESS AND INSURE POSITIVE SEAL. ALIGNMENT SEE NOTE 1 . ON DWG. 20101 I' . • lil j ALL MATERIALS ALUMINUM UNLESS NOTED. . l *U.S.PATENT NO. 861 3 555 OTHER 'U.S.AND -FOREIGN PATENTS PENDING .�- ULTRAFLOTE CORPORATION /O * REGIS►ERED Q\.. i l ,: PROFESSIONAL ~l'' Ii SAMPLE WELL LRONALD CARL KERN FOR ULTRAFLOTE* COVER '61 Ilio 17OEEBr_lit •`e THIS DRAWING IS THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF ULTRAFLOTE CORPORATION. ITS ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES AN AGREE_e`r No.11010•E ..r WENT THAT IT SHALL RE TREIATED Al A STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT ANO IS TO RE RETURNED UPON REQUEST R. 4, `/• 'I- AND IS NOT TO RE COMMUNICATED,DISCLOSED.OR COPIED EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY ULTRAFLOTE '''ti $ w L V•.�°.+ CORPORATION. 1 l ' BY DATE DWG. NO. HAN � 3 '/8/73 ' REV. 2/12/75 ] 20105 :, , • . 12"(304.8 MO, SQUARE PALLET t TELESCOPING LEG COPOLYMER SEAL MATERIAL MUST BE ADJUSTED LOOSE JOINT TO ALLOW TO RAISE PALLET PALLET ALIGNMENT FOR 6"(152 .4 MM) WHEN • A POSITIVE SEAL COVER IS STANDING ON ITS LEGS -10"(254 MM) DIA, NECK WITH ROLLED EDGE. I I GUIDE TUBE AND FLOW FINS I i i ,i II ,, i 1 I h q 1I e' ; DECK SKIN r ; II 1 ' II I I I p i1 II 10„(254 MM) DIA. HOLE �I CUT IN DECK SKIN �--� 44:(356 MM )- SQUARE BOTTOM FLANGE WITH 10" (254 MM) DIA, HOLE. ;\ I 1 .90«(48.3 MM ) 0.'0 . OUTER LEG • j , I I TELESCOPING LEG WEIGHTED 1 .66"(42.16 MM) G.D . ADJUSTMENT BOLT TELESCOPING LEG OF GALVENIZED NOTE , STEEL HOLDS PALLET POSITIVELY TWO 1 ' 1/2" (38 MM) SQUARE l CLOSED AT PRESSURES BELOW 5" HOLLOW BEAMS SUPPORT THE (127 MM) OF WATER WHEN COVER IS VACUUM BREAKER FROM ADJACENT FLOATING NORMALLY. ' CLAMP BEAMS TO RELIEVE THE', DECK SKIN OF STRESS AND INSURE TELESCOPING LEG MUST BE ALIGNMENT. REPOSITIONED IF OPERATING HEIGHT OF COVER ABOVE TANK BOTTOM--\ ! TANK BOTTOM IS CHANGED. I s !,! i ALL MATERIALS ALUMINUM UNLESS NOTED *U.S.PATENT NO. 3861555 OTHER U.S.AND FOREIGN PATENTS PENDING • �:ifr-"ZULTRAFLOTE CORPOR +„, TiOr .s NwE.4 i,Q REGISTERED \ • '1 • °` VACUUM BREAKER . PROFESSIONAL �4 �� RONALD CARL KERN FOR ULTRAFLOTE* COVER ., •• ENGINEER �i �.4'., r . NI/DRAWING IS THE EXCLUSIVE PNOPENTY Of L RARLO C ♦ORATION. ITS ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES AN AORt[- D%a No.17070-E /\ ,.. ML L NI PAINT THAT IT/HA SI TREATED AS A STCTLY CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT AND I/ TO /E RETURNED UPON REQUEST V ` / /j AND IS NOT TOSS 1 .DISCLOSED.O COPIED EXCEPT A/EX ID IN WRITING■Y ULTRAFLOTE '+le\`s y L �� R I= ,' CORPORATION. I f� -- -�-•� ■Y HAN DATE 3/v/73 I REV. 2/1 2/7.5 I DWG. NO. 201 06 1''I • FLOAT GUIIIDE WIRES ATTACHED TO •ROOF AND FLOOR OF TANK TAPE I ' FIELD LOCATE HOLES FLOAT WELL COVER FOR FLOAT 'TAPE AND MAY BE BOLTED OR • GU IDE WIRES LOOSE TO SUIT CUSTOMER ' ! 0.023" (0. 584 MM) ' P1 • DECK SKIN i I ' i 1 32"; (812.8 MM) -, SQ4ARE FLOAT WELL AND NECK I I . CUSTOMERS LIQUID LEVEL —\ AUTOMAT IC FLOAT •0 WELL PROJECTS. INTO it PRODUCT 4" TO 5" , (102 To 127 MM) FOR A POSITIVE SEAL. SEE NOTE 1 ON DWG. 20101 r NOTES, 1 • TWO 1 1/2" (38 MM) SQUARE X 1/1 6" (1 .6 MM) WALL BEAMS SUPPORT THE FLOAT WELL FROM ADJACENT CLAMP BEAMS TO RELIEVE THE DECK SKIN OF STRESS i WAND INSURE ALIGNMENT. 2. !MINIMUM THICNESS OF COVER, NECK, AND WELL ''0.080" (2.032 MM) +' 3. .'ALL MATERIALS 'ALUMI NUM UNLESS NOTED ( *U.S•PATENT NO. .1861555 OTHER IU•S.AND FOREIGN PATENTS PENDING U L RAFLOTE CORPORA TION sof70 ..`� �REGISTERED ,.;• I, I FLOAT WELL DETAILS /V PROFESSIONAL •A`�. ` RONALD CARL KERN FOR ULTRAFLOTE* COVER �\ \ ENGINEER A\\` �y. NIS DRAWING IS lTNS EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY O/ ULTRA►LOTS CORPORATION. ITS ACCEPTANCE ITUTES AM No.17010•E •NI t MEAT THAT IT SNAIL SE TNEATED AS A STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT AND IS TO SE RETURNED UPON REQUEST \a `-., I AND IS NOT TO SN',C ICAYED.DISCLOSED,OR COPIED EXCEPT AS EXPR 1MED IN WRITING SY ULTRAFLOTE '�' H . P. ♦r or CORPORATION. •'.� ry HAN (0Ars 4/7/72 REV•• 2/12/75 I DWG- NO. 201 07 5 ,i I fl II 1 . - , . , •3/4" (19 MM) EYEBOLT 14 X 2" LONG PIPE 6" (152.4 MM) WITH DOUBLE NUTS. (25.4 X 50.8 MM) - SQUARE PLATE PLATED STEEL j ^ WITH LUG WELDED w 0 ! 3/16" V ! Pt CENTER 3/16" (4.8 MM) .` TANK ROOF (4.8 MM) /4" (6.4 MM) STAINLESS STEEL 1 /8" (3.2 MM) 06, OIAMETER I ANT!I-ROTATION CABLE !'p STAINLESS ' 5" 'X 5" (127 x 127 MM) STEEL GROUND I, ! . WEAR PLATE 3/8"(9.5 MM) THICK CABLES BOND i! II COVER TO if DECK .SKIN—� . TANK ** F . Ilk ; . LIQUID LEVEL DECK SKIN CLAMP BEAM ! ANTII-ROTATION CABLE MOUSING PROJECTS • TANK I 1. 4" IT0 ' 5" (102 TO 127 MM) INTO PRODUCT . SHELL RIM PLATE FORNi,,,: A. POSITIVE SEAL. SEE. NOTES SEE NOTE 1 ON DWG. 20101 1 . 2. & 3 ; 7• .,DWG. 20101 ** NUMBER OF CABLES VARIES WITH SIZE OF TANK 1 I!. I LUG WELDED TO TANK BOTTOM 1/4N 41 .1' • _ (6.4 MM) , i i" • 0 *U•S•PATENT No.• 3861555 OTHERiU.S.AND FOREIGN PATENTS PENDING . w .� ULTRAFLOTE CORPORATION •/� ---1,. 4 ,E p .�/pa�/ REGISTERED ` 0,* ill .,�� \.�,� GROUND CABLE AND ANT I -ROTAT I ON CABLE : f, PROFESSIONAL �,1 ill! RONALD CARL KERN � 'II FOR ULTRAFLOTE* COVER '. • 4• �•A• o 170 EER , . \'e \\` �. THIS DRAWING Isp;7NE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF ULTRAFLOTE CORPORATION. ITS ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES An AaREE- N. No.17070-E �� .� fe \ � MENT TN AT IT SHALL •E TRiE ATCO AS A STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL DOCUM El ON AND 19 TO •E RETURNED UPON REQUEST W•.4� -"T�•� Vh,I- ANO IS NOT TO■E COMMUNICATED.DISCLOSED.OR COPIED EXCEPT AS EX AUTHORIZED IN WRITING■Y ULTRAFLOTE '' 1'10 Y L V ,' CORPORATION. h7. BY HAN I DATE 4/7/72 ' REV. 2/12/75 I DWG. NO. 20105 ill I1, F III ROUNDED EDGES PRECLUDES THE LEG RETAINER BAR \ POSSIBILITY OF TEARING OF II 1 DECK SKIN FROM LOADING CLAMP RING I' • EXPERIENCED BY COVER I 1 0.125" (3.18 MM) 0.023"( .584 MM) DEC .K SK 11 CLOSURE PLATE EAR I -TUBE CLOSURE PLATE ( --__�. li III w __ __ r ` <J . II '�� �'__ 1 11 LIQUID LEVEL \ , I, I ® i IL `` , L -- _ ` .I 1 y 11 , II' WELD TO BE LEAK 11 TESTED WITH TUBE FLOTATION TUBES OF PRESSURIZED TO 8 ' , 9" , AND/OR 10p1 20 PSI MINIMUM. (203 MM, 229 MCA, 254 MM)I `tea (1 .1.1 KG/SQ. CM) DIAMETER. TUBES VARY IN LEG HOUSING PROJECTS THICKNESS FROM 0.050" TO 4" TO 5" (102 TO 127 MM) 0.12511(10 MM TO 3.18 MM) INTO THE PRODUCT FOR A it POSITIVE SEAL. LEG HOUSING VARIES 'IN THICKNES SEE NOTE 1 ON DWG. 20101. FROM 0.125" TO 0.375" 'ell (3.18 MM TO 9.53 MM) SLIDING DUAL POSITION SUPPORT LEG 1 .90" LOW POSITION STOP (48.3 MM) O.D. NOTE : COVER SHOWN IN HIGH: POSITION. LEGS MAY BE ADJUSTED WHALE; FLOATING (RELOCATING LEG RETAINER BAR ON CLAMP R SING) TO ALLOW COVER TRAVEL TO DRAINAGE NOTCH THE LOW POSITION. k I 11 I l I ALL MATERIALS ALUMINUM Il UNLESS NOTED I *U.S.PATENT- NO. 3861555 OTHER 'U.S.AND FOREIGN PATENTS PENDING ••..� ULTRAFLOTE CORPORATION .,' , � f REGISTERED � ' I1 I OPTIONAL ADJUSTABLE LEG ASSEMBLY;'� PROFESSIONAL ; ' RONALD CARL KERN ; FOR ULTRAFLOTE* COVER ♦ EIzGIN EER TNIR GNAWING I/TN[ fxcI.usty[PROPERTY OF UL(MAFGOTZ CO1 PORATION. ITS ACCEPTANCE CON/TITUTt1I AN AGNtC• ♦ 4 ��•! 0. IJG.I7O7U E MINT THAT IT SHALL /[ TREATED AS A STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT AND IS TO SE w[TURN[D UPON REQUEST _ AND If MOT TO[t I .DISCLOSED.OR COPIED EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SEED IN WNITINa/v ULTRAFLOTE ‘.-1. =Y Z.V J�C CORPORATION. I ■Y HA N I DATit 4/7/72 1 REV. 2/12/75 I DWG" NO. 20110 ;II1 1 . • 10 GA. (3.4 MM) HOOD \ 1 /4(6 MM)V 2 1/2" (63.5 MM) ABOVE) r CUTOUT AT CENTER OF ii��►'1.-� .6�►� HOOD. CORNERS WILL B E . I ; �!����%%%%%�����.0 LOWER DUE TO SHELL �v4".��i4i�:4.�i�i���i!i!%.—4.40����i��0i10, CURVATURE . I ''C�� - - sue - - w-v� ! 44"(1117.6 MM) I 44" 'x 6 1/2" (1117.6 x 165.1 MM) CUTOUT. 46"(1168.4 MM) 46" x 8" (1168 .4 x .'' I 203.2 MM) ALUMINUM SCREEN VIEW A - A CENTERED OVER CUTOUT AND HELD WITH SIX 3/8" (9.5 MM) A' MINIMUM OF 14"(356 MM) IS BOLTS. • !I A REQUIRED BELOW THE LOWEST OBSTRUCTION THAT LIMITS UPWARD MOVEMENT OF THE COVER (RAFTERS , WELD HEAD OF 3/8" X 1 " RAFTER CLIPS, FOAM NOZZLE OR (9.5 X 25.4 MM) ,BOLTS DEFLECTOR , PIPING, ETC. ) . TO SHELL NEAR EDGE OF HOLE. ' / CLAMP SCREEN WITH WASHER. /Hmoi IF ANY UFC ACCESSORY IS HIGHER AND NUT. ! // ' I'' 1- `- THAN 2"(50'.8 MM) ABOVE THE AUFC DECK SKIN AND INTERSECTS ANY / II OBSTRUCTION, INCREASE THE 14" / ' (356 MM) DIMENSION BY THAT / / II ADDITIONAL HEIGHT. ADJUSTMENTS / MUST ALSO BE MADE IF THE TANK // II IS NOT LEVEL. - II • / II \-6 1/2"(165.1 MM) OPENING 9 NOTE : nk\NI 1 EACH OVERFLOW VENT REPLACES ONE STANDARD • TANK SHELL ROOF VENT AT THAT VENT J • LOCATION. 11 ', • L,�► , • *U.S.PATENT N0. . 3861555 OTHER U.S.AND FOREIGN PATENTS PENDING wc�- • ULTRAFLOTE CORPORATION 0.rain 4\ „ ` -A/o; REGISTERED 8. .r`/ PROFESSIONAL "\I OPT I ONAL. OVERFLOW VENT - 4•( RONALD CARL KERN FOR ULTRAFLOTE* COVER • `,4 ENGINEER 'i \ No.17070•E ,,,"r..;" THIS DRAWING IS,THE EXCLUSIVE PROPENTY OP ULTRArLOYL CORPORATION. ITS ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES AM AGREE- \.. MENT THAT IT SMALL Si TREATED AS AL STRICTLY CONPIDENTIAL DOCUMENT AND IS TO SE RETURNED UPON REQUEST •' E AND IS NOT TO SEC I .DISCLOSED.OR COPIED EXCEPT ASEX 17IED IN WRITING•Y ULTRAFLOTE =�s.S.Y L 4 �,e CORPORATION.'' • or HAN DATI 1 G/1 2/ 31 REV. 2/12/75 I DWG. No. 2011 7 I . + ' FIXED ROOF SUPPORT COLUMN (STEEL) l'ir . COLUMN CENTERLINE " GROUND CABLE CONNECTION .."7" COLUMN COLUMN WELL COVER PLATE SEAL COVER PLATE FLANGE RAMP EDGES 147. ' '' o o e I RAMP EDGES. SEE NOTE 1 , BELOW COLUMN WELL' NECK DECK SKIN CLAMP BEAM ASSEMBLY ^ DECK SKIN 1/8"D I A'. STAINLESS STEEL GROUND CABLE . 1• 1 .2 / COLUMNI WELL ., I _ I Ifi {— - 32" SQUARE COLUMN WELL TUBE SADDLE LIQUID LEVE TUBE STRAP WELL PROJECTS • . 4" TO 5" . (102 TO 127 MM) FLOTATION TUBE INTO THE PRODUCT, FOR A POSITIVE SEAL. \ • SEE NOTE 1 RAMP EDGES �, ON DRAWING 20101 � SEE NOTE 1 , BELOW • NOTES: _ 1. RAMP EDGES ARE REQUIRED ON COLUMN WELLS TO PRECLUDE THE POSSIBILITY OF DAMAGE TO THE COVER SHOULD THEY' COME INTO: CONTACT WITH THE COLUMNS IF • THE FLOATING COVER MOVES RELATIVE TO THE COLUMNS. COLUMN; WELLS WITHOUT THIS FEATURE WILL HANG UP ON WELDS, ; RIVETS, PLATE OFFSETS, OURRS, ETC. THAT .NORMALLY OCCUR ON TANK COLUMNS. • . • 2. MINIMUM THICKNESS OF COVER , NECK , AND WELL = 0. 080" • 31, ALL MATERIALS ALUMINUM UNLESS NOTED. • *U.S.PATENT (NO,. 3861555 ' OTHER U.S.AND FOREIGN PATENTS PENDING , , • ,•P0 U LTRAELOTE CORPORATION .,. ram__`(ram.• • , 'c,*r •EWSILNEU L\.,o.. COLUMN WELL DETAILS 1 RONALD CARL KERN FOR ULTRAFLOTE* COVER •` ENGINEER .'` • THIS DRAWING IS THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OP ULTRAFLOYL celleposiwrioe4. ITS ACCEPTANCE CON.TI S AN AGREE- • 4. No.17070•E .� MINT TNAT•IT.NALL SE TREATED All STRICTLY COMPIOENTIAL DOCUMENT AND IS TO III RETURNIO UPON REQUEST O 'L• • •r"/ • AND IS NOT TO OE C ICATED.DISCLOSED.ON COPIED EXCEPT AS EXPNESELY TEED IN WRITING ET ULTRAFLOTE I\•S.'"1: CORPORATION. at, HAN (DATE 4/ /(2 I REV. 2/1 2/75 IDWG. NO. 20112 I 3/8" (9.5MM) DIA. HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS 19 i I I ALUMINUM UPPER CLAMP BEAM SEE NOTE 2 I' 0,023" (0.58MM) � � V 0.023" ( 0.58MM) ALUMINUM DECK SKIN 1 ALUMINUM DECK SKIN • • L J& j SEE NOTE 2 ALUMINUM LOWER CLAMP BEAM NOTES 1 . DECK SKIN CLAMP BEAM ASSEMBLY SHOWN FULL SIZE . 2. SPECIAL SURFACE TREATMENT ON THE MATING SURFACES OF BOTH THE UPPER AND THE LOWER DECK SKIN CLAMP BEAM. *U•S.PATENT NO. 3861555 OTHER U•S.AND FOREIGN PATENTS PENDING ULTRAFLOTE CORPORATION - •ki INSURED 0 PROFESSIONAL \ ,' . DECK SKIN CLAMP BEAM ASSEMBLY RONALD 9! KERN FOR ULTRAFLOTE* COVER ENGINEER • • e No.17C70•E •'r • THIS DRAWING IS THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OP ULTRAFLOTE CORPORATION. ITS ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES AN AGREE- At �, M£NT THAT IT SHALL ■E TREATED AS A STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT AND IS TO SE RETURNED UPON REQUEST �• E' AND IS NOT TO■t COMMUNICATED.DISCLOSED.OR COPIED EXCEPT AUTHORIZED IN WRITING RY ULTRAFLOTE S T L V fir CORPORATION. !� •! ®r HA N I DATE1 1/15/714 I REV. 2/12/75 I DWG. NO. 2011 3 I. • l f «. • � • A;; FFIDAVIT Ip 1I, S72^et}dw Q. f. - , being duly sworn, declare that I am t owner of the property involved in •this application and that the oregoing statements and answers herein contained and the' information herewith submitted are in all !respects 'true and correct to the best of tqy knowledge and belief. ., 114Aoubscribed and sworn before me this day• of , 19 , , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at . Its � , ame dill Not ic) ( ign ture of der} \ le- • A404' dWqmq. • • ) 0 Co 0 7 ' _sc-__-=:---- )A-{-1,, _cE ...., 4-43 /....0,40, . (Address) (Address) Iwo LI i Qv(k_e 1 (1)pc__ , , . . (City) State) I' I (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) . , ' CERTIFICATION • This is to certify thatthe foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been foun Fbe rough and complete in every particular and to conform to the 40 4, ations of the. Renton Planning Department l governing the �kincff ItAc plication . VVVVV U . Date Received AUG 1977 G , 19 By: vitS, •••••...............IB•ea.alt• '4 . I' 2��NG p pR�� DE Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE'1HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, 1WASHINGTON I � A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON FEBRUARY 7 , 19 78 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1. KOHL EXCAVATING, INC./IVAN C. CHRISTIANSON, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO R-2 , File No. R- 114-77; property located on Sunset Boulevard Sr: W. between 80th Avenue South and S. W. 3rd Place. ;K 2. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO INSTALL ONE ADDITIONAL 50,000 BARREL GASOLINE STORAGE TANK, File No. SP-066-77 ; property located within the existing Mobil Oil Tank Farm area situated approximately 1 ,000 feet south of the inter- section of the future S. W. 23rd Street and Lind Avenue S. W. directly south of the Olympic Pipe Line facility. 3. S AND INVESTMENTS, APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT CONDOMINIUMS IN R-2 AND R-3 ZONE , File No . SP-123-78; property located at the northeast corner of Grant Avenue South and South PugetIDrive. Legal descriptions of files noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETiITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON FEBRUARY 7 , 1978 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS.. GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED January 27, 1978 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS' PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn' to before me, a Notary Public,', . on the 25th day of January . 19 78 SIGNED • 11 11\,U;A- H1,\ \lk l I .. ROUTE SCHEDULE • PLANNING DEPARTMENT !', DATE ROUTED. j/ Y/77 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: REZONE MAJOR PLAT SITE AP VAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMI� M,p �L C L ea:, WAIVER C SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE, PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE ///6� 77 'j /kS ( Kf..0 ..SD, $►.) WS�ii-106.1. SIGNATURE J OR INITAL DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE /1,/ UILDING //•1/-71 RAFFI C'' ENT �� //-/s--7 7 ENGINEERING 4/ i//j1/77 44...._. FIRE 11/5/77 HEALT ti71_ oTil,fT*j `_--- iiis/77 REVIEWER ' S CO OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : Gdi°0097'5' "W:..S /Whig .sivtr7x-A-r rs /9IA/ zd/t-747LG 4' r' 7 ed) tie. au .e JTse/ r ,e. .e./e17i��-1C �.- - g i PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W . : ' j i ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS ' TO : Finance Department ' Fire Department Library Department O Park Department Police Department Public Works Department 0 Building Di v'I. 4; Traffic Engineering Div . ' i 0 Engineering IDiv . ek Utilities Engineering Div. FROM : Planning Department , (�Isigned by responsible official or his designee ) MIG-� q� ' SUBJECT :: Review of ECF- '7-77 ; Application No . : .�,�E76G - .. 7 Action Name : 'AwnL 0(1_, eo , C.j4L- i7Z'uir f )E2— ,VDL(4. 01 &lb'lL(IF FA.c11 c i-ry Please review the attached .'.'. Review requested by ( date) : i REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : �DePartment : ,fir ; !�f) - � Comments : Chi ( /,,>� /C�¢7e,x) Z '.i() /4/01 , , r� /� aou.?4/7 t /l - r/ (C� d, D/./ e).L -re)..e.iier --- . (. ..1)ec ‘1e#(41, 7-1_772 ; . Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : 1 Department : it eeV"� • • Comments : No ��'Twc--" --- • • ,. . • ,. 4______ i l f Jz//�77 Si • gnature of Director or utlhorized Repre entative Date i iI II 6-76 it (OVER) . , III 6 • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ;��T`'�? 111c �' ` - Y Comments : A/o S•. y ;�.� � i�,p.zc_t u), f4 r�;xcf . i J , / Signature of Director oc Authorized Representative Date 1 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : N:\7214E Comments : Sk 4\\ CcSHi �� w‘'Csii ‘.)SP1le" j Signature of Dir rized Representative Date 1 1 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : U1 -tTic_.5 Comments : \-`6i•-t. 1 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • Department : Comments : • i Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date N LAW OFFICES OF WATSON. GROSSE & KELLY 1103 IBM BUILDING SEATILE,' ASHINGTON 98101 (206)624-7371 January 19 , 1978 Mr. Michael Smith Planning Department City of Renton Renton WA 98055 Re: Mobil Oil Corporation Special Permit Application Dear Mike: Pursuant to your request, I enclose a copy of the NPDES Permit issued by the Department of Ecology to Mobil for its Renton Bulk Storage Facility. In addition, I enclose copies of Permits issued by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency to Mobil for the construction of a 50 , 000 barrel gasoline storage tank and installation of a hydrocarbon vapor recovery unit. If I can be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely yours • te •hen C. Kell SCK:djb Enclosure o R 1/(t4 0 �Arr z "G® lytu • I f* . Page 1 of 7 Permit No. WA-000194-5 (I) Issuance Date Expiration Date 6-30-81 • NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM . • WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT • • State of Washington • • DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Olympia, Washington 98504 In Compliance with the provisions of Chapter 90.48 REM as amended • and The Federal 'Water Pollution Control Act Amendment of 1972, Public Law 92-500 • • MOBIL OIL CORPORATION _ • 612 South Flower Street Los Angeles, California 90054 • • Plant Location: . Receiving Water: 3006 East Valley Highway Black River to the Green River Renton, Washington 98055 Industry Type: BULK PETROLEUM STORAGE Discharge Location: 47° 27' 45" N and DISTRIBUTION 122° 14' 07" W Waterway Segment Number: 04-09-06 . is authorized to discharge in accordance with the special and general conditions which follow. ,;``� r,�^ ROBERT K. McCORMICK, Regional Manager '( (�o Department of Ecology (M) JAN • 1,((ti 20 15 .8 • EPA • Page 2 of 7 Permit No. WA-000194-5 SPECIAL CONDITIONS • • Sl. FINAL EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTTS . • • • After July 1, 1977, permittee is authorized to discharge effluent, consisting of storm water, subject to the following limitations: . 1 . . EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Parameter Daily Maximum Minimum Frequency Sample Type • Oil and No sample shall Twice monthly Grab Grease exceed 15 mg/l, when discharging ; ( /1) NOTE: A sample for the purposes of determining the daily maximum is defined as the arithmeticllaverage of a minimum of four grabs collected at equal intervals during a 45-minute period, not to commence during the first five minutes of treatment facility operation. However, one of the four grabs can be omitted from the average, if unrepresentative. The omission of one grab as lunrepresentative must be noted in the permittee's . monthly report. ', ` Samples shall be taken inmediately downstream of the effluent clearwell.• Each grab shall be made with a one liter sample container dipped entirely below the surface ;of the discharge stream. Inspection for viS;ible oils in the effluent shall be made and recorded daily when discharging. ) In the event that a visible sheen is present, • reasonable method of elimination shall be applied prior to discharge. S2. MONITORING AND REPORTING , I I, In addition to the monitoring and reporting requirements set forth in preceding sections of the permit, permittee shall maintain a record of all data collected on the operation and efficiency of treatment and control facilities and the quantity and quality of the waste discharged and shall comply with the follow- ing: • i I • iI I �' I'I • Page 3 of 7/ .,-, Permit No. WA-000194-5 / • a. Reporting Monitoring results shall be reported to the Northwest Regional Office of the Department of Ecology on a monthly basis. Monitoring results obtained during the previous six months shall be summarized and reported on a Dis- charge Re ort Form (EPA Igo. 3320-1) submitted no later than the charge p 15th day of the month following the completed reporting period. Monitor- ing shall be started 30 days following the effectife date of this permit, and the first EPA No. 3320-1 report is due six months thereafter. The EPA report shall be sent to the Northwest Regional Office of the Department of Ecology. /LT .cv„`' oKr � :, �:�,//Jr ,Y /6 3,0-•! ) b. Records Retention • The permittee shall retain for a minimum of three years .all records of monitoring activities and results, including all reports of recordings from continuous monitoring instrumentation. This period of retention shall be extended during''the course of any unresolved litigation regarding the discharge of pollutants by the permittee or when requested by the Director. c. Recording of Results The permittee shall record each measurement or sample taken pursuant to the requirements of this permit for the following information: (1) the date, exact place, and time of sampling; (2) the dates the analyses were performed; (3) who performed the analyses; (4) the analytical techniques or methods used; and (5) the results of all analyses. d. Representative Sampling • Samplings and measurements taken to meet the requirements of this condition shall be representative of the volume and nature of the monitored discharge. • e. Test Procedures • All sampling and analytical methods used to meet the monitoring requirements specified in this permit shall, unless approved otherwise in writing by the Department, conform to the Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants, contained in 40 CFR Part 136, as published in the " 1 ederal Register on Utober 16, 1973, or the latest revision thereof, which references the following publications: • a1 Page 4 of 7 • Permit No. WA-000194-5 . • e. Test Procedures (Continued) • 1. American Public Health Association, Standard Methods for the Examina- tion of Water and Wastewaters (latest edition) . • • 2. American Society for Testing and Materials, A.S.T.M. Standards, Part 23, Water, Atmospheric Analysis (latest edition) . • - 3. Environmental Protection Agency, Water Quality Office Analytical Control Laboratory, Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes (latest edition) . S3. OPERATION AND MAIlVTENANCE • ao Chemically contaminated effluent from the washing of trucks shall be treated in its own oil/water separator and discharged to an approved drainfield. A sand and grease trap may be substituted for the separator and drainfield provided no chemicals are used. Any drainfield shall be in compliance with all Seattle-King County Health Department requirements. ' b. A posted oil/water separator inspection and maintenance schedule for all . operational separators and the holding tank will be kept beginning on the 'date this permit is issued. These records shall be made available upon : request of this Department. c. All contaminated runoff from the enclosed tank farms, and product transfer areas shall be intercepted to approved oil separators for adequate treat-• ment prior to discharge to the adjacent marshlands. d. Water accumulated within the diked area shall be discharged to the oil sepa- rator at a rate that will not exceed 160 gallons per. minute. This discharge will be controlled by a valve that will be left closed while unattended. e. An effluent shut-off valve shall be installed on all oil separators on the discharge line downstream from the effluent clear;tiell. f. Oily sludges must be disposed of in a manner other than to a state waterway. g. All detergent washing of vehicles shall be conducted on the established wash rack areas. h. Sanitary sewage is to be discharged to the existing septic tank system. i. The discharge of tank condensate drawoff shall not be allowed to run over- land to catch basins that are directly connected to the separator. . Page 5 of 7 Permit No., WA-000194-5 • j. Cleanup and containment materials such as sand and sorbents, etc. , shall be readily available in the event of a spill. This material should be • used in conjunction with a contingency plan listing emergency telephone numbers and procedures. k. The use of oil dispersant chemicals is strictly prohibited. Any emergency use of these materials must be authorized by the Department of Ecology. • S6. OTHER REQUIREMENTS • • a. Sanitary wastes are to be disposed of in accordance with the recommends- . tions of the Seattle-King County Health Department. b. The installation, construction and maintenance of on-site sewage disposal systems shall meet the regulations of the Seattle-King County I-k alth De- partment. • c. All washing operations utilizing chemicals shall be conducted in an es- tablished area that drains to an approved oil separator. This oil sepa- rator effluent shall be discharged into an approved drainfield that is isolated from the sanitary disposal system. This effluent shall be dis- charged to the sanitary sewer within thirty (30) days after one becomes • available. - -- • • • • • • • • I ' Page 6 of 7 Permit No. WA-000194-5 • GENERAL CONDITIONS G1. All discharges and activities authorized herein shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of this permit. The discharge of any. pollutant more frequently than or at a level in excess of that identified and authorized by thus permit shall constitute a violation of the terms and conditions of this permit. . . f... _ G2. Whenever a facility expansion is anticipated which will result in a new or in creased discharge, or which will cause any of the conditions of this permit to be exceeded, a new application must be submitted together with the necessary reports and engineering plans for the proposed changes. No change shall be made until plans have been approved and a new permit or permit modification has been issued. - G3. The diversion or bypass of any discharge from the treatment works by the per- mittee is prohibited, except (a) where unavoidable to prevent loss of life or severe property damage, or (b) where excessive storm drainage or runoff would damage any facilities necessary for compliance with the terms and con- ditions of this permit. IThe permittee shall immediately notify the Depart- ment of each such diversion orlbypass in accordance with the procedure spe- cified in Condition G4. . ..-. G4. In the event the permittee is unable to comply with any of the conditions of this permit, the permittee shall: a, • Immediately take action tol stop, contain, and clean up the unauthorized discharges and correct the! problem. b. :Immediately notify the Department by telephone so that an investigation can be made to evaluate the impact and the corrective.actions taken and determine if additional action should be taken. _ • _ . • • c. Submit a detailed written report to the Department describing the break- down, the actual quantity and quality of resulting waste discharges, cor- . rective action taken!, steps taken to prevent a recurrence, and any other pertinent information. Compliance with these requirements does not relieve the permittee from respon- sibility to maintain continuous compliance with the conditions of this permit or the resulting liability for failure to comply. The Department of Ecology • will take into consideration this information submitted by the permittee in exercising its discretionary authority for enforcement purposes. Notification received pursuant to this section, or information obtained by the exploitation of such notification shall not be used against permittee in any criminal case. Page 7 of 7 1 • Permit No. - WA-000194-5 G5. The permittee shall at all times maintain in good working order and efficiently operate all treatment or control facilities or systems installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. Gh. After notice and opportunity for a hearing, this permit may be modified, sus- pended or revoked in whole or in part during its term for cause including, but not limited to the following: a. Violation of any terms or conditions of this permit or any applicable rule, i standard, or order of the Department; b. Obtaining this permit�,by misrepresentation or failure to disclose . fully all relevant facts; c. A change in the condition o£ the receiving waters or any other condi- tion that requires.either a' temporary or permanent reduction or elim- ination of the authorized discharge. \ G7. The permittee shall, at all reasonable times, allow authorized representa- tives of the Department: rt Vie°J `�f,,tip a. To enter upon the permitteel'i's premises for the purpose of inspecting �•. ;! ok , and investigating conditions relating to the pollution of, or possible / cc/a/l-'4 pollution of, any of the waters of the state, or for the purpose of `-t"`' investigating compliance with any of the terms• of this permit; - 1 b. To have access to and.;copy any records required to be kept under the % i�;lu terms and conditions of this permit; ;1.. . ;,;:r/j' c. To inspect any monitoring equipment or monitoring method required by this permit; or, '1 d. To sample any discharge of pollutants. . G8. If a toxic effluent standard or prohibition (including any schedule of com- pliance specified in such effluent standard or prohibition) is established under Section 307 (a) of ;the Federal Act for a toxic pollutant which is pre- sent in the discharge authorized herein and such standard or prohibition is more stringent than any limitation upon such pollutant in this permit, this permit shall be revised or modified in accordance with the toxic effluent standard or prohibition and the, permittee shall be so notified. Section 307 (a) requires that the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall promulgate effluent standards (or prohibition) for toxic pollutants which he has listed as such. I G9. Nothing in this permit shall bedconstrued as excusing the permittee from com- pliance with any applicable Federal, State, or local statutes, ordinances, or regulations. i • i Ll i u Till "17 i t. 11 Notice of 4 r: v Control Agency Construction No. 1789 '! NOV 8 1977 HEREBY GRANTS Date PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT,INSTALL,OR ESTABLISH • Edwards Hydrocarbon Recovery Unit - VC 800 for control of hydrocarbon vapors from truck loading rack. Stephen C. Kelly, Attorney r Watson & Kelly Mobil Oil Corporation P NAME 0 NAME • 1103 IBM Building �' 612 South Flower Street N C STREET 1 E STREET N• Seattle, WA 98101 R Los Angeles, CA 90017 T CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP • INSTALLATION ADDRESS Approximately 1000 ft. South of Intersection of S.W. 23rd Street and Lind Avenue S.W. , Renton. STREET CITY STATE ZIP SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS GENERAL SPECIFIC Permission is hereby granted as provided in Article 6 of Regulation I of the PSAPCA to the APPLICANT to install, alter, or establish the equipment, device, or process described hereon at the INSTALLATION ADDRESS in accordance with the plans and specifications on file in the ENGINEERING DIVISION of PSAPCA. This approval is not a waiver of liability for the infraction of Regulation I nor does it relieve the APPLICANT or OWNER of any requirements of other government agencies. A. ight A.R.Dammkoehler Reviewing Engineer Air Pollution Control Officer Form 50-118 Approved 11/73 ( 77,(;\ r.r)r„ 4.7.4,, .., f I I JAN � '�.. p lq V . NOTICE OF COMPLETION A • ,., .: „. G . €34- .. ,. 1 1 Regulation I, Section 6.09(a), requires that the owner or applicant notify the Agency of the completion of the work covered by the application and when its operation will begin. This form is provided for your convenience to assist you in complying with this part of the Regulation. I , PPPLICANT or OWNER SECTION Mail to: Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Plan Review Section 410 West Harrison Street 1 P.O. Box 9863 Seattle, Washington 98109 - • (Gentlemen: The project described below was completed on and will be in operation on Signature of Owner and/or Applicant Title Date FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Notice of Construction No. 1789 Project Description: Installation of Edwards Hydrocarbon Recovery Unit — VC 800 for control of hydrocarbon vapors from truck loading rack. • Owner's Name Mobil Oil Corporation Location Approx. 1000 ft. South of ,inter5fftion of S.W. 91rd Srreer and Lind Avenue S.W, Renton, WA ❑ Inspector check 50 Engineer A.J. Wright' and Inspector check Follow-up (Estimated Completion Date Plus 7) 1 Date Inspected Inspector REMARKS: 1 1 ❑ See Attachment i FORM 63-11.1 5/76 ' • • f -t Sound—A- it roiiun n Notice of 1769 • Control Agency Construction No. HEREBY GRANTS Date NOV 2 IJr r PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT, INSTALL,OR ESTABLISH 50,000 BBL 95' Dia x 40' Unleaded Gasoline Storage tank with Ultraflote Corporation Floating Roof P _ Stephen C, Kelly; Atty, Mobil Oil Corporation NAME O NAME • Watson P Kelly, 1103 IBM Building N 612 Snuth Flower Street C STREET E STREET A N Seattle,l Washington 9R101 R I rSY Angeles, CAE 90017 rT ZIP INSTALLATION ADDRESS • Renton Bulk Storage Terminal , 1,OQO feet South of Intersection of SW 23rd St. & Lind Ave, SW STREET CITY STATE ZIP I y SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS • GENERAL SPECIFIC Permission is hereby granted as provided In Article 6 of Regulation I of the PSAPCA to the APPLICANT to install, alter, or establish the equipment, device, or process described hereon at the INSTALLATION ADDRESS in accordance with the plans and specifications on file in the ENGINEERING DIVISION of PSAPCA. This approval is not a waiver of liability for the infraction of Regulation I nor does it relieve the • APPLICANT or OWNER of any requirements of other government agencies. • L7(C-\'' • 61MAAAA.L.Q_L,LA1/4 A. R. Dammkoehler Re;=iewing ngineer Air Pollution Control Officer Form 50-118 Approved 11/73 I , • • • • • ,:?•':, .- .. . ,k.,"' - . , ;c::.7.-.'•;.;' -..i.f ,.:i.;:',7-i=i7§-,:;$1.1gpij,#:e: -- --- ' „ ,N4F,,gX-Tii;';',7';',fg.,:".',,:-.#,•'...;,.....,•:,.&,- -.:-i-..:/•!,':,'.:,'.-..-f4i1.<2.-;;i; -,;:E-;;,,,,;‘,3,1.1,.7. ,..?,..,-..,'.-,.,':'::,:•.e-fl".:gg,',,..':;. ;,:.ziy•,-'?::5....,,,.:;,,,:,,,,„.,-L.,2 .'''rl'',:',''''''.':----,J"'');:;. ';':;;'i,K4f;:Ni''.!::t,:'i',';',A': ,' .?'ji:'.:%"4g:f••:,?4:::Igj'i',.:*':i:X::::-g' ;. ,,. .,kyri,,';t. . - ',r'.3 '. r.:;,.: Ai. ;'f..i.,,: q',,',',(ki.:: ;::.fi'_;t'-'''n:'!:'''',':::•'•'47,-'.,...:. r--.,'.1.'-:.-••:.11,5.,:',:.:- - -...:•f.•'„,'.-,,i',..t'ri,',:gitii•-"liet,i;:f4ifiii....f..;,,,,. .3'--...,..f.---..',,,..,s.... 44.1,16.,,f'f.,,...:?!;,,..•,-...-.-„,,,,, ;:i-,1-„,..'.i,-;...5.,....-.:;:',..:ir,,,'-..'•;),-;,...•::•:-,;;,....,.. ;,-3... ggi.,„,,..f.?-; :.'::-,---,-,?,•,;,, ,,,•.).....,-,:-:.-_;-.,-.;„...:. :,,.-,5-,:".•,,,,k,,,,,:,...-,-_,;,:.•,. °, ,,fr", ,,..:-;::,riv;:.:-;.,7.'"'.::,,;,;:iNS.,...,.''if-'4....... ;: .:-, ..'".:::::-;':',:iii:.i'l) ,.',,,,,',.:i..•;:::::::,:-2,i,---•;:41.if-,.. _, -,..;-',.'.:-• , ',, :::i._....i.,.•:;?:'.::'',..4;',-Wif.Sic:ih,-*•-:-.1,.:':, :;,,",,..‘,1k:. ...:J: ; -:: '4.,..4t''i'•••••';'1,.::-.:,..' ,--...,--f,,,-'•"t''' ,,..,,,:--'•••-k.;-:;:4;i,':3;',.-.4,',77.;tr,;',.:7•;:i7,•••t--i-i".V':.•:,•.';,...V ',"'-'-:2..';',•''''..f ...-- ,•;:':.;„,,,;;;,,,-;.4-1-,:-4..,-,,,,;..-....,,,,,.=;-,.,:,:,,,,.....,,,,...,,,,...,,,,,.:,-...-•-,,.,,,-..;.1.:i.;:;-,.,,,-..;.:::-,,,-,z,„-,,,J.1?-,:-:,t:j."...„..,'.;•-!..,:,,,:i--;;T:,:,.;.--f.;-.;:?;-''.';'..--..•'' ::,..,....,, 1.:...;. -•',:;--..; „:::c-..'.2 •.',•,-,....---. .-.1:.-',.;;:,:3,':.:;',.,„,,,,?,.H '4.-:-:::'-... ..-,'..:-;-:;..",:-.....:k: -;:ii.-.=:,C.'• : ',:-.:'?..-.,;-:...'::!'-'c''.- ;:n1;.:&'•:":-:',:;0"-'1; :.';',7='::'',„:-''...;;;•-'12;:! ...i.:'''',;.- :::'......:.',.:,':,"i.;q,::,.::.:::.-,-.',':,‘...-.,-...'. .-1-... .-•:-' ' --'. *•--,'" ".,;'''';':• :-:',7-,,,,;:.. ':'...i".::'-','-.:'.1"., -q".'-;,..•7;-f.,,,-;`,-..':.,',,4'-;-,';'-:".=,:-i-•.;-,r.,.;.•,:.., !-',;-:.,.i...,'..,•.:'':*•,':-...-.;,..k-t,..---,:', ,•'. -'.-;::':,;;'1.;,...1',..,%''..,•':'''..;;.'••-r-,,:j--:,,r''...1.-J:'1, '''-'i'",'S''',-•%:.;:L.:,'',.';''''‘'''''-'•;.:;--:,r,'.;',L'''.'.',.(.:','",'.; '.:.',.-,-;=:.'.:, .-•--L "..- •: '---' - '- '' ';',-.''''z''''''':;'-l'i,""zi,--;-(-;.'•"'--.:-...14-,'.....;:','''',,,''r'.;-,',".:-....,'.---;1*,:','.1 --''''.;=",.'''''st.'.-'-, '' ;'...-•':•,-.f'1,-....' ..-'. -:.• : -'-•-•'.'..,•-•.•.,i.•.•;;:•;,--.,••,,,:‘,...-...,•.2-,-...._.;,•- -...,:•,,,•;„•,,,,,-.•;,,,-;:,..,-...,..:•,,•••.1•,,,•&...-.;,,-,•,-;:i;,s....;,..--.:„.7.,-,4!,•,-;-•,,,,,,-..-.7i.-....;- ',--,..„,.-..: - ..... ,-..•:_: "-,•-..--. , .... ....:.1,:•,,,r.,::.]:.',,,,-,,,:,-,f7,4,:..2,-•,-,•,-:,,.!..t..-..,'.5.„•-..$::!_.-..,,-.::•,:-,-::•,;•:,-•,-.,-,•.5,;•,•ii;_-,;;:.•.2;-•.('- t,,.;.:,••••.,..-••,.-,..'-,•!'L.:•-.•:,.,„ ;,..,,,,,,..-..•5..,..,,,•:.....i,..,..f,.,,,,,::-..-,,•.-;,••:::':••••.;•.-.••:•.'•i•,•••-•,,I•f.'••-.J..4.5.-4,„,'m...f::•;•-!.;,-2.•-.,;..-i„,• ,•:•,•:-,:1,,,,,_sn'.';'-?.'f,•°;',1•••'.-.••:5-::-", ‘,:.• ' ; ;. :::::.7.: -,••-:--. • -••'1,7... ''.'"..".•'..";;I:';.:..",:,-... .;','.',.i.-',-'?,...,.:•''..-'-'%:'',1":i!.....'.1,1'..,''P::-,J,.:',:,.,,''.,i',,I..,''...'". , : :,,:'-.:',-....':.. ."''''',',-', ''.:-.,.:,-...;.','.,1.',.'-,l'...-......,`-.,4."'.''.,,".."',::'-'_,.P..-,V;:.:2,,';:..,-,'.;;:-.5:::;'.':','.'':.'''i,i,,-.',''gr.,,P,-,..,;; ;; ,','; .Y'',%.''S'::** ,:" .'" ,• -. ,'''''' ' ' '''''s:'''..:''''''''''''','''"'r,,,' L''':''''''':'.:-'C;•::^",,'''''N.'.'V4:',' .;I'L".''4''',',1"'` '..C•.1:-....''.'-. ,-''.'''n1';'.'7':`,.-`.:'•...,,:'1-''.'•''-;;''',,i,'---f.:..:,-L.:!".'-',:-...';;..7.-.1,*,-..,,,,./.-7;--1!;31,,,.;:et.;,...:1,i'd,---..!,•',.;,'-'74'.';'="1,•,•••"•''','-'•'--"'-;:••,'"'' '''••' •• — -.4 ;..• ;;,,-,..•'.....",.',...,,.....:,•• •,••-:,,,...7,. .' ',:..-7:1.:..-.....,,,..-_,--:"...;,::,..!,,.::....f, ..,..}.7..,,,747,..;,.::,::,,,-,,.:.,.,,..'4,.";.:•:-.;,.....,,:,,,',;-';',;,,:i..:!;`:,,V::,.'1..,-2.''':.-."'''•:'!.......-......."F''."1.:S.....1..:',Z,:';c::,:.".•,:..1';'.,.'.;,:-.., '.17.7..:.%‘:".....-,!,-.•;''i,;7:::: .(;•;:.•;,:•:-'..1.7:1'.i;": -...::::::.',::-.1,-;:t":'''.:.:i..;:i,..;....-.,.-.....:-_:','''.'...:;.."=.'..-:.;',:.-'-'-':::....'..;;;1`..,..;,.--.-''-tC.S',..,..::::•:•(,;. ..;;Yi:"....1.;',.!.:','':::'•"- -"•,..4-;..'4';',.. , ;:e::: ':?; ,..=i ,,I.':''' '.... 7.7. *-'..5- x%;-' i - ''.;:" 1; :1." '-';'''.;"--4f.73;,'--'''''.--'•.''-,:'-';'•••";--ck11:4 :?-...-'." ‘. -i,-.":i..z.,•"•;.:'-''• .1-1..?.:•-..a'.1' '.ti,l‘...;:',.'".:.,...',,;-;.,':::A.:Za':.-Iir,'L:.g.;',.;=-,.-...;•';i'•,'.."... ‘..- i.;.--.4.-,.!.--,1:','••. .'•.z:;-,':::;•:-t1,1.!';',-,'.,;:Y„,:.,,i;i--;.,.-',L.A:,,,:;:-‘-`4%;r1;,-,.;;••-;',1,;;';';':; .-';';--: ,-.r ;'-,.!-..':•-.....-.F.:::'..:',...: ,,"- -;'.:,:...::-.1...:-.,..`,...i.;.:•;:' s ..;.*:,,',;,'..1.,,,•7..1...-"4:-..q:-.7.,?:::V•Ali:;',;:,,::!zy.;'•-2'',,,?.,.:.;'...9•;', Y,--qi..-••.,:`,......,';:l:L-,,.,;:v• 4:;: c.., • ..2;2k.1.4e::.b1-1';',,,,;':".-'.-..;;;*,:..e.. .,-'ff":::”%q.,i',..• 4•...,.'.. ..t1,0„',;.;:,:-.E.,,‘,-;;, ..."'-•;::',.. i'if.';;',•<:',3:.\--,:';',,:-...';',--t,k•An„'F.'"..'::.', :,.'".7'',....:-.1',-",A!',i;tt'A.:::,". ":':.:•?... ,.ks,7'..e,s;,,,-,,,,',','; ',.:'.'.%.45.:',.,i',4.:;',";.:;•42.-.•.:•7 '..,.,'.-,77,,..., -.4,'.•;•',:;,',!,.-..q.;-,.- -,,..,....te40:4::',1,;:.:4•74',.:,-; '"?.-,!,-;.-;•,;•,: ..!...,;%t..;K:;;:.,::,;':.:,.;..,..;•:,. ,..f,....:!-:ie,,r.-.,.;'s.t.i.,:ca:-;;''':::...''...L'i,.,.,-i41.77',..,,.-;;;',.'::;;Z7i.,"fc:.'r.:..;:i;'•,?.:•--:..,:.:-...:,1,-;:',.0-i':.T-.•:-•`'"..-'-',.:,F:y . •;-..f.•;:,.".:;c.:,.-., ',.!..-_,....A,:s,:.-i....„!,,c,:.:?......Ki.v.,..,..,,41..;.......-....,... ...,-,-;:„...j,•;;;i..,43:::..47.y„......•,:•,,.:-..,,,.;.:,..i-,,,:,,,7.-,,,,i,,,,,i2,..v,;;;,.1,,,,....1..... s-;:k.,-, ?.:f'4n;';'',,F:.;'.,.:;:::,',.`,72,...:".:-...1...`4‘;...,..'! ...i.:,..j-.:*,!4,.:,•:,.;;;;':i,;;;;;,......,-,••-,.:';5-',..i041:- :,::.1,;:',.',%-,,?:',.,.`,:; .':.:;;:'•.'";,,..;',: .-_:. ,,s,.. .:„'''„''..4"::'.:';.t " ; '-'-' '-' .A.;2',•;D;'..' . '...':':C-3.'i. '' :'•.' ` `'- . ' ' cit •;•••••.ir:;,`,:•';'•';',1:-,'•••;"- -7;',..',•1:.:,.,-:!:',-,..,.;..,;;:;•;3,,,,:.!.,,.. ,...,.:i...,-, . :••,,r ;:-. 11.f.2..:. .. '.4.:' - 1 --.4r,!!;. :;.i.:.T.I'!.?i':P.,:.::'1:;'..,:'''...;:.'.:Y. .::::::!;1.F.i,.: ,::.:•.;:::',.('1•,::,:,::.1:f;:.':;;I:),i,:'?,;;Y:;-;.;:.':,...;,:,, :„PiEV::1,...:1;1;‘, ;..,::J4:r....,',1'.!,",..,,,,....'• ',,%,i,W....":.;'!:.4.,;:::,..1.4,,,*:;,,, ,,,,,,,;:-..,;-, A:1;1 ', .''`i.:.i '..;,:.:........, ". <I.:....'..'-,:'.:;;.'Sel:. i.":,•1,',:".:rs; .7'.'....'i:,,....::,:,,,'.:.2:....:,..1.-..j:..,r1..-.:7,.,..:9,1'.',:',..;:c,,,-,-:-::::::,..',..:1.7*-:: :.f.:::.r....'..:.•'-:,:.:......i.P.•'...;'.;2.1-1','-:.'•1`,-,1".';':••••.'..-;:-.11:•:•.W:.'•'''.,-;:!;.:-..'.:.::: ';...•_: .,..::•••,:---..',;=•:,-i':7•:',!•.,:.c.;,-ig•Rii'.4-.J';',„-• ,,•;2-•.:,''.• :,,'••• '=.':-';'I,'....,:,,I....,-.7,r;i:. '..,.,''.':. ••••-.'. ;:-.::::."---'..-,:::;.:.•'v,;- :,,,•.-.',"••,.,,,',.:/•;,:ril.• -....,• ".'5'47,-..1:',.,-';',:::,'-:•::...,,,,,',1',',-.;•-,,,:i.-.•.-:•,..r.-?.,(,:-:!•i•,:-.'-'.,-.. -•••• &?::-I,-..:;-.. .-:.•: ::,-,, ,..,'•:;,-.:?:',.-:.s...i.,....-..;;Ij.,.c.4',.". . ,'4.°:....g.:::• ,:::'!:..'' 1:--,;,-;Y:?..,:j!i•541.7,..;;3...i.ii:::;;1-1.f,4:,.t::7:, .-!'-Y,-:','::'q:i: :::'.4-:-.'::: .'s -:.-:., :----..-'.i.s,',:TI:'). ::•-•:,:::::.-4.'-iV:::::',1z;',.,'!:,-.::..::::',:::.,.:1:-:..-. .1-,,..',,..:,..,,,-.„?.1--..,-•:.;-..-:'.-'.:...-...i.::...t:::::::,;;.;--. .E',.:',1 ••',.,',I.,-;:: ?...Z;.•'.•,''')2,.,',...'.!:.;t: ',...-.:•.',-..:.!2.;:;:•;,:4.T...::;;;;?,',...',.;',..,...:•••`'.:,,...1':ti.:Vig.,::::;tp55i,..,:.,,,,,..;:1,1,,Lt 1;;;;::-..;•.....,!:,t,•,!••,',.•:'••,... ,,.,..,.• . `;.:1,T:_.:•::':. ......:',..;_:;',',,r; '.;:22.,:,'.:•,:r;,..;;:.F..'2...', ',,••••1•F'• :',--:-,-.•',',. .'::::_,..•• :.:,"%,',.;..-. ..,.tf.F,:.'7,....,:''. .;' ..'.,-7-...-':;;,:k;:..'.,\Z‘''P.:.-•:•:-.-i..•12"•??.-',.";.'::.f,3:',;..:,.%.,..:."'''(.:',V. 'S • .''.:-.: :1.-7:-.',..:','•C,:'''' .;•17...,;:2.1:1':'..,1";', '''''" •••.,'',;:-.•'-.- .- • I ' . :•-:'T'•:'.'"":',,',..f;':•,,,..•(,..*•,7;:f5;,4:,-,5-j,::"":...' ..'2. .- I :t•;'. .-',.,,,-.'-' '1'' -'-'',-'r"'",-:-.V,'.::-•...' . *-":77••-•,• .:;•i-f;''...-.'::::;:.--.•:-,;•;ti;.;'•,,'-',--2.-,;-,'•":i';-' ',-,•••-.."'.,--,•'2,,f.:•-•7,`,.:i7,;.',../.',..:•':,. .-,;.:5.'...5•'1'..-;'!:.', • ... . . ••;-''','' •' '-;',',,'"•--,•:•.::-.• ,'.'•' .:- 1, '..•• .,_.;':-.1:..2:,. .. ..,'",',:.;-,,,.,V.:••;.,;;‘...7.."-- -..,-e:/:-..."•;'n'...:!-'-.2.•',,-,:,...-•.,'.'f.t'•,:'.4F::i.1:,-;•-f.r:;;: f..-,-:', . r...•',•„:',..5.,:az,,,,t','-'5?",y,47:it.-:•,f,,,,:..,.•. ;7-il".- f •• .•:'-- • •• •,•'.1'',2;;;,• •...",;:i•,::,..:,_:;";,.,,,,',..;;;;;;;;!•;:: ::::-..,•.-••,.•:•,..t:.",•','' '•••.,i.••••.-r-:-,•;.,•:•: -., ,:•.',.."--:',--',...;:.--•,,:...., .•. t•-..•F-.;5-*-,',.-::-.•''.•i',..,....;-:-..i.•••,,-,,,....';.'•••, '...,:,:;:,..;:-, , •'...',;;,.:4-1'..f•....:',,F;',';',.,-;.',,: ,,-..-'::-;•.::. .: . ,' , ,'•':• .2.,,'.'...•'.',.:',..;",:•'. .';.-'-':'.....,tv:71•`%;:',::-:,t7',T.,-..K .,,:-7,7,';''.:"; '.•:-1," 4:-...,-.:(• ;.' ' .* '' ::, ....:',',='!...;::.:'„.':;;,. ••••',....::::-'::,...,:;:!-.*;'-.•;-!,',.;•-.`-`,,'•"•:, :•`?i.:',•.7:,',','!',.'::,.'*',':.'7r.-j . -, itf -'' a• i.f..,;%,',"!....'-'•:!',-;:;-;;.-1.'•., ... ,. -:•-•,.•fi.L.:2;?::..-':••-•:.,:-.' '...7.:•?,•1•!•••,3z-.::::.?..'y::•;'•'.•I';;'..;•-.:'.•..;•-,,-:',;-,:-:-•••;f':•:'•'•, .• •-F,..,:••,','•,!:.-:.•'--:••••••-•:.-,-'.....-7.-7•2•.,,`:•?...--.••i -.'•-•'•:,-.'-;.,•:-•;;,4-•!. i-,;.,F':`,.•':,';,:,;.' '...t, -.*'-`1i:':'•"",,-;,-:6';'?,•ZI;ef:;'•'.c .:,:,;,?...Z.:'-',•- ...„.. • ,s. ,:.. . ; .,. . ..,....,.,,,,,,,,..:.. .q.,;,....;.,,,-,,_::-..;,,,...,.,•••:.,,..,, ,;•?z,f,1,`,•,`,•:-;_''',7•::•••`.':i ..7.'."I,?,-••:::'',,,)jr!,•-;. -• •,-,..'---,'",,t,',',-.'...;:"",.•'.••:••.,••• .','•"--,:c-,•t'e.•••••.,,7' ''..".:1,r;'•:?5,"-<;.:1"',:::'%-:. •,'..";-';:;g:'...",•:',7•'•."•'''-:-:-.1'.•!.%.:-,... .tr.'f."inz..;;;;5y,N...-•:.-':.-,,,,t1;-;,, .......,;,_r. 1.:.-r.._t:"... ....,..• .-.,::::-..•,,,,.;!:,•„4,,,..,,..,,.....7.:.,;.,.,.„,„-,...,,,,-,!,-, -;-: .,...;.t..•.:,,;";.),r-.:-,...;:,,:...•, : :•.' :5. -.?" . . ;••• ,; •%.:,.;,-:;2 .•••,,,''; ';r:,,•:.ii.;••;: :',:,,t,•?1',•,•••,:x•,.':'..„-• . 4;. .„ii,..s.F,:-...,;,,,,,:::i?.re,•4•,--6;.*: .z.,..,1;.;.i444';',U -: • , .. -' ••-•.- '''''.. :-'"; .;.•';.,'.7-;'•:;.•-',--....`•?,,. .....'.?-''',,.,-:','-;•;':',,,.- .•?.;:.. .:-::::....'--.,,:.::-':;.*:::.4':;..,...`•.LI-•: '..,.. ..'",,';;,.,2-.,•'''''....',.. :.:',1.Y,'.4.-.1.7:5.,',!Yi2:Z;:q.'7-''''''.:.' .:':'.",.'''; i :'. ...?:i•''''.. . . i.;;T!-, v"' .. ,111-ii,•414,V., 1-i' ,",..-i. , C.:.:',::: ';..'''''''- "''' ' . ' ..; ,.,:...,• -''.'..1.*.'',''''.''' ''....,`'.' 4.;:.:1,1"-•'$.*,'Y.ilfiS,1,! ^-4.13'; ''.:,..., '. '';.,'.:,: '''..-..::::, :.-',11...'''''';:;:::'''''''if::::'.1i..1.-i.: ',.:.'!'.1'..i?:::..i''''';';'''' :-::'''': :.:.'".::;1 :;.:?'.i'l :':'''i''''''':::';‘'...:1:".:`4:".1::17±12:::r';:- '''''''":".'''''.-'''''. 1:l'''''..'''''':-:::':•"'''..•'•::-::::•:':•;7::::•;.''...E.'1,'-::;1'!:'•'. ., .• ••••••-;: ';.:.43.;.',.:k. .,. :••••:•.--::::,..c.'. .,.,.. 'g':. 3-13,.1.rf-.§4-if.,:-,v.,,.. 0..• ,_,,.. . ,. ...,.....:::.,......,,,_: ..„., .se.....i::..,.„....,.,,,..,.,).:.p.,,..,,,,,.:,•:.•;.;•:,_„:.:.,:-.2.,;:f.,;••n....-;,;;.:,,,.,:i,i2.„-;,...,,,•••:• ....,-ece:,•..;:•:-..,,,..._':'....• e: :,...-, '..,......,.::,....,..:::,...i..,,fic.......„.:-„,:i,•,,(..-:.-:).:::?.•-: .1;•-•:::::-•;•,,..,..,::: --v_g,'.,Ii4?-;'• ;::.;•,,,e,...':-'1-Y;;J:-M:1-t.ri:.,"ii'ig-i:: :',.T:--•:,:•V • ,. .. . ..„.•:...-•.i-.... ,i:-.-.;•‘,..,_::.--...,:•-,:•:.,,.:.•,'...•.,::,. ..--Y,..-;:f.;::::4.-..,'„Ip.,.....-•:...r.-:::!::•..:,..-,.. ;-,.5-•••';-,:•:.•-,';', .:.''....,?'-',ii:-:',;:j••••••:',,:::-•':.::,-.•:,-',-,.-;,;•-,•-' • /,'',' 7•--',:, ..:, ...'.:::'•Fl•-••'0:KY.;F:.q.: ,;.,:7",•if-';,-;-.:,.•:.:•:::','..:.'.;,:,.:.; :.--`,..::;.-.',';.t;•• „-,-.•-,,,..-....;.,•••,!:.c,•.;,,•!.•,•:-,.;,5.1.,,,,Ii,,,,...,!,..:.,..*.4.tit-i4..,..,,,,,. .._.0 ., --...;:"• .1- ,..-:.--..-.•"• ...,•-•- ••••;'1:12;J.43-1f--:."....1.-•.i4....,-;.;:ii..:•'•'2.'-:;-:-..;:!--:,n--;...:'.:-.,--.....:-....:•.:;:'•.,-'::•:••;-,:.'5••-.f,.''''''-':.1,;- '.:-',-:.7--: •••.•.'I- -';';:•:,•'-':'!.....'.:;,--,:,:,..1‘•,,.. .;,; •-•...,:,•:,-.••-•,-\:•;;••;':.,....., --- - - „..••••-•':•;,:.'i.,:?`71'i.,';g'•i,..;-::::;gi-_"ii!:::•,-,t?,,,,.::-.Z.if:0,, -•]."-.'i';'•••••'C.':--:'....-.-.. .•:.,-..'•:-•.:':'• -7.•-:...-....,-,,f;•';f:::---;gg'•••,:,'-7"..;.'••••••::':,...-':.:•?;. ...;•:'.''..:-.•• •••••'',';'-'-:•-,,:'''''''''''':-:,---',-':-, '''. . ..-. '' -.... --';'''';.•':::;,.,;.,.•--.r.-:::!';:'•-- '7" .. .-; '. -„-.1,-,:-. .: . 1,:;.;•'2-.'..'' T,rf,1. 1,..:tZ.in.:.. '"; 1 ..:;:r.'.r..:;,1:.'..%-:,),:-.:.:-.;-7:::.;:...I .:' ;",::,:t-;:::"Vi',3-DR:.;.'•,:-;:.:, -,!...--;:',,,;:-,.,:.:•:,-;:‘,...r.;;; ;;;,.:-.,,, :t..'M...:-I..:.1 0:":-)1,:.•'7: -' ,..., ._:. . .::.....-:'----- - ','::'.,--.‘: i'..,..;-::-::,• .,:.-. .-1..,..,;`,:•,..,- .,2,-,t-,,,It:;:f..,';;:si,,•i-,-',4';;...- ':.“-:::, .•;::s.'1:--.•..''..,;: •• :',...!:.i.i.,':7i."' ...Z.,..i.....'-',,...,.: 4.,-.'..,,,:,'.'":7e.,:i•'..,4::';',":"",.;:,•;•17.,-",.;i.,-, •t, ;•..- .-,2, •.'-•••••,,,,,:.,7 .' •. ,...,-.:".",i',:,;:,,..:1.1'.',.:7.,4:',..,.;;;•.,'::,'".;;•,;.:',,`,,.-:;.:;• ',Q.'..;.:?!,-,-,t'.••••-,;..,...;-::•••.',7-77;7;"•,.;...r-t-,--7,77.7 ' ...''..••', :-....,,•_..;:•.',,,-;1-,',-J.,.. :.'.'•'2..'...-',•f : ..7,..:;•,,,-;.... .,,...••,:...,....:::,,,,,•, ,;,:i7.... .1"L7',..,:;'•'';"" •,',:. ':' •.,.:.. -,• ./,: ',... :•;,,,•..,:,;.•,... ,,•••;„-;,...,••::;...,,.,'•.",-,,,,;,-.:,,!"..cz•,•4Ft_.•„:;•is...,,,.....t7-•,•.-7A,•,.,3:c,•••: ' •,'.•-,,i.. 0..77.7. ...,1,.,....,.. ;; :1:•'; '.,:...,: •''.:::',,i , ,:';•:."....... • , -t:,••.•;.- '..,::',-,•:',.'•': '•2-',":'.,,L,-,'•:-.7';:,x':•':::.*•••';'••;A,...t'''''..•''''. . • .. . ,.,-. .,. .„ .. .: •-. .. •••". f'' : •",.'---1.,.. .,:f. ..,:.-:,',:..":.:";'.':"." . . . .• '''' I . - .--: .-' ''' •'.," '',..t..r.'...:7'f.--,,,•?:C..,Z.,........;',.,-,'..-.. -'7,;' ,.`,1'."?::"f.0-•.,''•.'..'‘..-:,;-"-;-').",•:.', ,•:.VI,ft.- :'•;;_,,.::7-.--.7.- • I.1' -'S LI, •!tali.'. -1-,..-: ••., , - e.,..,•:-.',.:....-;•:. -,-.,• . •--. . ?--,;.-.y: ...,... -...... '-..• . . . .. :,.... .. ... . . .. . . .. . . . . . ........,.. .,. .. . . . , „ .,. .. • . .......••• . • . . . , . . , . .. . . • • • It I , . • . .. .. . . . . . . t , . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . .• . . . . • . I : I, , • . . . . :, . . • . . •• .._ ,.! • .. • . , •• • .,„....:. . .. . ,... .. ... - • - . - - ..,... • - . . I ' . " CA • .....:, -. .., ,. . * I ‘ • - . - . . - -- . •. . • • . ' . I . . ',-,2-?td, 19• _71.; ._.4 ... .. , . .. . . ....._ • . . : . . . . .. ... . • • ,. . I. ,- . •... . • • . :__...., • . : . .. .. • .. . .. .. . . _ . . .... . . . , .. . , . . . , ., „ . , . , I . .. . • • - . .•-• :. -..- - .•• r ., . . • . , • 1 - 1 . . . . . . .. - - .. ..• • . • ., . . .. . . , . • ,-c-T-5-r - 1- s 1., -Li • , ..... . . , . . . .. . ..•. •:. "• • . . . .. . . ., ....„ .• .• •-• • .., ., ..... . ,....•.,,.... ,......... .. . . . .. .: ... , .. .... ..:,..... • . . - . . • • • • . ,. . . . • ,..... ,.. . .,.. . . . ,. .. . . .. ._. . •• • • , .... . . • : . • - . ..: . ...„.., ,. .. .. . . .,,• . • . . . . • • --•:..:• ... . . . . • i 1 • , - - - - ' -- • • — ' . ... • • • . ..., . . .•. . . .. .. .....,.... . , • I. Lit ........... - . „-..,) ..._-; . :- - - -.-. _-.,-,....:•.-. - - ._ .:--.-..... . •. •,.._,-.•-•-•-,,,.....-;.,;:.,.,-• ..-..---. -.: : i •.,. ., . - . _ -.:•... ,•.,.•,•. . • .. -.., , N u.i.. 2 •• ..4 1• , 1'• . • : .:_. _ — ..-„, - -t...,-,::::..' . -••:•••••-.-:-::.',',•:...,..•••.:.,':, •':-- .-- .•-•.,•:• , .• , , • .. . ., .. . . ,......., . .. . .,.- • . . . •-•• lyiST/ ... i a r . . !.- ,...;'...•:..-.:,.., - - ' . . .. .. . . ., - '.-• .; .!I . . . •••..• • , . . . ' . .'1-,.:::. • '. -:'' •''1\46)(c... i:f. p -71_1t.1 fj,r J -----'‘)1 PII ell • . • - -. . ‘• ,...... . - :• ., ::--'. ii..• , , •• ''s :JAIL': 1 - - ' . - ' .. • ''''•-•.!." :::-;-...•••''• ' . , . . .... - . •. - , .. • -. • • -x-. 1•-, . . _ .. , . , . . . . . ... •. .. . . .•. . • • - -. • . , . . . •, - • ' • • • •• . . . .... •• .. . ' . . .. . • . . .., . , . . . . .. .... .. .. , ,.. ....., . . . . ,.. • • . ' . -9.• , 77 ,-• ''• \''‘, '•-•. '.„ ''. •1 _ -- ,., .• . , •• . • . .. ,..•••-.. -. • ,. , , ,,...-" .•, ,. • . :.- • . . - . - . . . -, ... -. • • • •• -• ,• • • !' ' . .,j • s `,1 ',. i ' 1- 1-1 LI 1441: ';''' 7 • '';', , . , .... , , . . . . . . .. , , . .• „ ,. . . : 0 '.. • . \ \ i •. . . . . ...., , :, 4. , . .., • \N. \',..1 I. .; - \ . . : ••••‘• ':'• • '• - • ---'•-. . . 'V : • - ---.- - • . - ••- . ....• •... • • . . -- . 1'• . • I ••• • F-L • 1 , . . . . . . . . . ' ,,,...: • ' , • . . . , . , ..,....., .:......,...i ‘. •, . 1 • . CL' ; , • t • , . • . . 1 . 1.1) t,(16011. c), - (2.(..k, . . . . , . • - . . , . . . •- _.e. .. • • • . . • . . ., • . . „ . . . . . . . . . . • . . • •... . . 1 "--' • '1111:k i --r--:• . - • i - • . . . \j: 16 11\1.11 • - • ..' ciciq- i '7 `..1-''''-'') . .. . •. , • . . , . . . , • . . . , . . .. . • . . . . . . . . . . . • . , • • . . . . . . . . . . • . . • . . . , . . . • . .. . .. . . , . . . , .•• . .• . .. . . . . ,. . • . .. .. • . . . • . . „ . .. . ,. , . . . , . • - .. • ..- . • , , , . .. - - _ . . , ..• , . .• , . . ., , • . , - . . . .. .• . . . . . • _.-___......._._______,• ______... ........ ..._......__.....___. . • . 1 •-.- . . „ - •,, . - ... , , • ,. , ...., • 1 , . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' I- • . . . • , . . . . , • ,. • ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • - I .• , :.. . . , _ .... . . ., .. ..., . . .. . . .. , . • - .• -.-----. .• . , .. •...- . ,...,, . . , • . „. . -- —" _. . . •....,.... • . . , • ...:5 .,., . . . . . _ - • . . . .. , . ,, . ,..... .., ,. . .., :., • , ' • . . -• --; - i.'. "..,::'"'''- '...:.',•:::,-.;:•,-.-.••••••-'•.••••;-;-"-;',•,:,•.-.',••••...••-•-•-• i -..-•-•. -' • ". ,;• ,. •.•.,..,:,:-..-;,'..:.::•••,-; .:„•,' '. ....:- •„;.,..-':. ••...,.• r•••••'.;',-"A:',..-•...,••-•',-,••,..`..,•• •'-•.,?..%.27;:'•'t:',.-..;:•:=.f.:•,,•',', ,-.,:.'•,:..:',--i''';',.-.,...•••..,',.-..,•-•:.:','-...':•;:'‘i -:: •• ,• • - 7;•", -•.-.--, • '.,•..•••,-,•,::::.f.,,,-7..-:.',••••.l''.'-..-• .:...:,...:::•,:',,',''..••,.-5:;:,,x,',,.,';,:•:::•.•:•'•:.:•-••i,:-.::;'•,•i,::.,,,,.. ..:.;.'.•.:."''..•:.- " •••.''•;:,..2-.-.••,.--..-':-...:. ...•,;-•-•'.•-,-'.•••r7.''.•'. :•'-•'.'-':-. -•. :••••-..:--:-,•-•.;',..:_.'::•',- -- '• ''.,• -.5.,:,•-:-..*-'',-.''',. ..;•::::;;::',.' ',4•4-'••••••:"'s-••'•••-•--'›n..,',-,,,•-• ,,e%•••..q•A ••67gg--•••••:i7V2.in•7•"•••;;z:-k.4"?4•Ti.,.i.'•.JY-K••••ii•f., •;•WiFfi.7.!":'•ii••••::::,j, g-'-',-,7AN••••• •,;'A.•••ii‘.?iP'',••.'•-•if:. •_•i':-,'-'jf•J•7,7•'••7,?••,7,i',:-:,;•'••••,•'•;•-i',•••••7•. ••••-•Vg.-i"-.1---•-iFfi- A.•- •7. •".F.;••;•„,vi--:•••••R-K••••:ie..1.•t'•••••4`..5i•••7•i.7...--!_rs;•,:lit'Aii•L'..7‹:',4••I'ill •,.%,.:•••...k:••••,•,-,,•,.--•-•-.7;.,-;,-.;44.-_.'..ff.:4-,..•,;•.'•••• ';'.•.r:•• ::;,••• •.-.....•,..-,-,..-:,;',.7(..•••.-... .-1-,,,,,,„•,•4"..-A'z.::";.:•••t";-• '..:•:•"..1.,",',,a,"•:.•• ••.-•,'•••••1'.-•":"i•-"":4•;"•',"ii•';4*•••••••"5:•.", ,g7.'"•- ••••'•5';i','••••••;'.."'':•'-'•'-'1'''••,•"-:•'"•""*''-'•1'''*••' K'''•L'•''':'•••'4•;•-•'•'*•tt:';,:ti'-‘4:-4",.'"I''''''' ''''';'•'"A"'••••••4'°'7';''';'-"4-5';'••• ••*'•/*•''''''''' ••;1'; "2-.-rn•::•.:;••:",..4",,•':•-*/..-:,:•,1".•;•• ',";••,•-'1'.':*:`.j:3:; ;',-...,•-•;.;',•.,*/*,';`,-*;*•;t•_-:4.-„,,;',11:f."',-,,,;-;•;:•,:,.n2,-.;';;'•./.,,-',',:,..f. -- •-q-';‘-j,`";::;n3;:,V; :,,N-,g'..,.'4.r: ti' :,',•.-2,1,,A.-,;• 7;:::::::.; •:: ,.:.;1',"-.•:„.2";::,•:,...-1:•iy;j': :71-„:,;-;`,..-"If;;:4Pif.:"Z.ef.ii,„'..,i'..,; •-;•%,,/,;,:",.,-J.:-1.;; ;;;;,:,:41,2,1•-,,•,:,:c.,:7,,,-.,,,,::..,:c...,;,,.:..,...4-,:,4,,, .''''''''''.4'.'2:-:','.."'",'•':-.''..''r;*.--"Y.''..'-'?;..:,1'..A.C1--;..!,!'."-11'-'.'.'4'1-..1.;4!-:;,., 1::t.:,.X:-.1'.". .. ::;.,;:,'.:','.'.4.:::,. :.'..Yrr,....!,',,.,,,i7;.;:j.7 ,:?,:i.,.-.1:- .i'::.:5;F:-.,,"7:.'.: 1,'-.::',:',:i;T::..',..r.,::::,..r...,,T, ';'..:',.3-4,14-.1.::.--',.;;. :,'''?-?Vi.,;',,q,i5:Ii?,;:..'44.,,,....., -...;,,, ,',":, ,,76.,',-,. .:;,..;j.;;T:..:.;In.,..,M,":-.L ';..,..?:::..'..Fiitr,g';'',. ..!.f:-:::t'.-;...-.4'..;:,:4','.:.,:..T..?..;,;:j.3... ......'s.:••;i.;.V..k.:,'I':"..,:,:4--%.". .,"f'.'--3$•..f1:-..1,"'::'''..'- ;.3:',,,;?....,.•;,,[2,-;,7.:,......,:_,.;-.. .......r. .'i-'...,:fi-....,x;'.;t47,.g--....;,! ..".";:;:•,.._:,4..a.....?„;-.2:...5.1,:......,f,,,.,......;,,,:.5i,... .,..-.q..t,:f,...,..........g.,,;.,,,,-if,.:„,...,..f!4,:j;..:7„,..,„,..4..4.5:.... .,.„:,:,:.,...,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,rotilri.z...,,,;...,4kii;iv,v,..., ,: ‘,.........,4., ........._.„._..,,,;:.,-..,..:,2-..,..7...f.,,4i,,,,...K,..-;:-..„5,":„.„;....,:,..:;„.;.,..-„,.....4....,,,i-,:,-.,....;;;,..:.-/...,. ......?.-7.'..7.., -,;:-......,,,y,...,'....... ',•,...n.--,i.;,-.,...;;.'-:-....,1,...,:•4-'.••:- -.•-•-•••T, -,:,•••:-:.+,-.1-,ip-•;*,•7.•-,,,,';',. ;,.. :•.;•1•?k-;-::;:;-.'•:*.-•--;.:,;q•>...r4ri: irr4:-:••-•-':- .,,,•';-.•-i----n::-',•-•--':'',4:'-1:x7:•••,::'''--- . ..:' -':e:'::--.***'*''.•:':--• •:-•.:-.7.--::At'Y'.'"t"':-:::-n--;:f.'-- -'..:r...;?','-f.:,.:: :...4•1.:,:,:-.i.3-:'-g:.,-.--,,.--;*:.5-,.:.=,:.,-...y'....'.---...f.'-',-:'.:-.'.',..-!;?-!-.--,:. ;"!..."...':?'.`;',:'-':.;.',7`:.',.`,.:3,;-'.2,---.--.:;1..-.',,-;',., ....;-..!•f`i,f-.',„'..i.'-<;-t*A.'.ffi.-.).'t.':•..t.•,•:..Y. .i.,'",-,'' '....-.."i:•-..:':,-. ....'-'...-,z,r.',-5'.A :.?.,...,V,t'...c{."-',.:C..'.'.f.".'::-.•' ,.:-.•Y...:".''.',•i:;.-,-.';,....,..-;...-:..:::,-..:';''.--.1:.,'-..''''',-7:EIT 'f:::*:-./;::5a-,2".,5.-jj,:.';'"-?.'''...'-'1':,!:':, -Y,?11,..':•I'Lt.'-',,,,:,:.--.1,-;',75,:.:7,-'.----;'''', ..',1.-7•7;,;;4.S.,!'„,..,.-g.',P,...-',"..,-..i.----.-..".'......-.:,!,!'. .'....-7!..:,•*.-.'i:.i."2,..k...,-.,?..'7.?,.;'4'K4;i;-.4:7,-.1-.'4'.':-.:R-=',.'"ii,-:.,f;T.':.:•:.';.:" 1,-.T.c.1.!-:.., -'1i.i7-,:i;::::-,:: :'.!'-..:..--- .-<;,?...t,',../;',..':.;-:-..-...-.,s. .---:.-'-'::':,'.. l'.;...-7.:::.,:,..'-':;-).:-.;':..i"..... .---.."-.7.. ..'-'..-;',',E-";.'.i,..;-.:;?,-.:;•"`:.-....-., :-..•::'1":.-"?.--;-'-"Kl.:';•-•:._-,-......:•;,.....:'::.,-'-,..z.'..:...54';',•'<'3''''',•:,••••,:,24i•-•.?.:.-r.--.5.:;•-•':•-•• :`':':••::'••.:C'''1:-':•,?_M2. ,'•;•:r,,, •.;".:;•;SL•::,;,:•;:•f,',•,:•:;::-.' 1,7•;:.',•,.::• •:-•;:.;',7g.,;',;••,'• -.;:,.;•,,;:g:k:•*,t," ;;•,,i;4;;7••:::;;; :•,,,4:,.11..Y':: •,..;•,,-i...••.....•;i1;;•,: . •',,,,,,.•••.i,.•-,..'_:-•-•:,"; ;;;••••,:•,::.;;;',"1- ,;•••;•":.•'.'!"•:•-;f•• :;:•.:,,, •,."?•:-'-.1;;;'-...,:'•'.•.•.7.'..;[,-:"•;4:-::-•.•-•,••'.1,,,,,.••;•:;.""X: •••••;••.;•;;-;•-jilr;',,'.."-.,:•• •'•;•:31,',4•::•••,:::;;;;-::•••••.;%.-..•c•••;.:•,,,,,,,,7,.,,,,,,,,,.,•,;;;;•.,,-.;:;.•-_-':1•';''.-y.:.:;,,,,,`,":1,.1',,,,i';;.,-":,.,s2,:•.,••;;,•,:i7,i1;'...:::.:4-:•;,-;:,;:fi:24,4;; O:';••••:-.•,.;!;,,•‘...",•'fy:1!.,;.•:.;.,‘4•1••!•:;.••;;;•',"'f:.:•,-,•,•:•$:.;L:,•;:::•n•:WV. •;-;:,.,•;.:-....,•-f,••,',••,-•;. •:'•7 '••f''..f 7;••••,';-'..'• '''.•;;•.,••,':,:::•21-•'!:•-•-;•'•',•••:••••••'-5'4•':‘.‘.;:•!".-.•-•"';'•;••'••••21:'•';''':''''••••••h'•7-•'''''••:;•''-:.*:';',:'-2• •:*--;:-.*;.5:.'':4•'•.- :'•'4,:'•:*.;:',*'''' :'•f:(-'*,::'•‘=;*:•:•*'-'-'''%::-'-:.:•:.:••*,' *,4*-;',7-'!:•*:1;7•: -/k74-•, '';';'•.,••-r1-...•-:-..r.,:-•:., :;.'„'!";.-': '',',-;:!:'.•-,1-:;';.,-,"-,;!.::,•-V.-V,;-;f,::„1„,!•;;;!-L:,,:',:',.: :::-f,-..-'1 :"::-'-W-•'•'-':•'1-!-::: *•':,2•L''••*-:'-'-'-''''•:''''Pi'''''''''••-:7‘''-''''''''''.-**2;',".': :;::-<•":-.-':'*-*---''''-•*•-•'-,::*- :.'-'''''''''VX:'.•":-''''-''.::;;''--" ':T-''f'-'''':!:';•''::.':•*•;',':•:‘:;"**-':":''- ''.-.'•7:::".1'.-•-:'*;*•,..:1.,:,•,';';'*.'-t-,':',*-:(:'...,-,,.••::'4:.'f':'4'`---:!:'-i,',', ':';'..*:;;S:'••,-..;,iff:•2:•'&,r;•-ra:,;•.-7•'-':‘, Y,',g-':*-:-1•-'.:7_?:*:::','-',?::5'-'4.•:4•:': '-''..,.*;-:- ,..;,:-..,;--,,,;,,ii.„-,,,-..;,,....„.,„;.-:-....-...,'. ..;,I.-;..,7;•.".,,:•••......,.•,.:•,.'.:,•.:.,`;;.L.;.:,,,.:::". .-.,„..•••„.•...,;,_•,.•:••-".• ;;-,:•;2)...,...;,4•2•11.:;;;;,''.:±•••.,4',I..,,;;;•11;k2 .,,,.;,,..:,,.:-,,',',.1., ,, ,...„..4:,1.;thigi;,1-,,,,,•,,i...i.e.,app,;;•;..,.:44•;:•-i.„1-.1••••'ai,..•;;•;•1,7,,,,,,••=&y.i.,`,..3.„.,,,t,:.'-Z4.••••,44:41.4 .•••".^*....:,'4,... r••;•.,-...4••••:•,. ....::-.•:- -.. •:,• ......7...4..--.t...r,.:.,,:.--i..:::,..',;f:;;;;::,,.;--7.,:,......:. ,._,,:::::;.:',E.,.--,.:. -.: .,-...- -' -.---...-;,..,..,.-;:,:f..7-_.47.47.,--:... ..'7:4'::::',:.••-.-'1-::-,'":-:.•:-.--''''''.----''''''''''':;---'7-'::..1.7:,::::i.,-t...:'..r.:.-.;;•::-.--'.---t4';'-'-!.--..-Z-;.----:-...:47,;.7--..c'zt-.----.,,!-:;:.^.-- -:':‘":"7-,'•--7::4,;::.'ff:..-J: ":.";:.-.";'„'-', -..;•.....,....‘:ii:"-'-',.-...-.T-•.:L=. ::..,=---,-,,,s. :..zt.i:::::-7.::.:;----',-::-.:-•::',..-';"ATT:""-t..:T. 4gfr;t:;'=:'-';:::-..,...: --4.;- .r .'43.-?". •:4.'i•-:;,',,,',;-Fr_5ti•-:.i..r.t4t-7-7•:----,,„:::-.;Lki.,,.'-;: i.FE't.•-,.;‘,,,t.!:';.,,;..7.1Z-kIi;.- ...-..4-.i.-',;'''.76i:;-7,p';:..-::"-'7."....4. .-..;i:„.-......7...:x.i't.;;:--r•-."-...'-_.. .::::..-,---.,,r7i:.' ,.-.Z.":3•-,tic:,:.-.,. .g7.''::.;..f.:4::i- : ',.7;.,..": -.:..7 .,..,.:"." , '.7t '',4*.7- ,,,',,.,-...:'. .-Ysr"-.,2-';'•!;-',7-.:.----k . . :. . . .. . ........ , •. ‘, . --• • • • • -• ,...-.. . . .. ;-..,,-.... ...f:j..,,,.;,„ .: -•:..-.....1-..-i„.. •,,••'-:•.:,,-„_!.:„.... -...,.t..,..x.,-...,_ .....::-.-,.:.- .. •: .-..-:.'..:•:::„'..,..._:,.....-..:i','",:,.„:„....-:',-::::.....:'....:..,'r:.,..:'..-..--„,'.:2-;.'....,-;.:.',,,..:,..--;--;"...'.- :.--..-7:-:- :"•73;-"::”..,;----'-'-';--'>'•-.7-•:::*-;. •.:- :*-c• ;`'';';•••);•.'.L-7!*-.: -t:i.-1-:;.''*:.:':'':•;:':....''-':'.. ' • '.*.: .....::2:•.:•-': '..'.'*'.- - ' .•''':"..-'::--1*--•. -•''.. ';:-'s'.; *** -'•:-'*'•:•:.,,•-:,`,*:••--.::::::'-'::::::'•',--:*-••:-'-': •,•:--..,..':.•':•::'•:,;:;.,;:;•.•,:'-.;*•:**-':. '"--.*::-.*:•.. :*-**;•.*::r*. *-::::-.-,:--.F.;;;;',-.';'::7,--,:':**,:;.••••••:: ::1-:::•;.;:''',*.:`----.4'-.•...;:"...-:::1"...-- : -.1-*,1,...;*:4•L,• - ..•' . . •'- . • .: ' * - --••'••- ' -.I.. :•-I- • • • * p,h--- •••••-• "."-•- : _.. . .-;‘-',;:i •' ;* • . ••.-• . • * • .. . - . -* • - - • - • - *-----'-*- : --- - -- -.-*.-----*------ -"--..-API-I.Z. ,..RC. .M',..49e./4.t/hGT4#4,ivi cm rh,-42..-1.7,./1 74i c I-..- •: • '''..-'1:3-.1_-'i`3_5' 12 r.tY - 247 7/ • ----- t4,7---f:z.. • .,. -. ''''' • .r-1- 1.1.../d. i_.-27-__,r,.tr-r-Cc-icr.ETTXA2W42 l•-, ),-2_-_,------j--,..._ -- • . , .:.-_,_--- - . ..4..-4..__I _ • .. .. ..:-. . 4---- -,... . .. . .. '.-."---q._._...,.... ... . ... '---i --1 • -r-7---4-----7 --- •.:. .--- . '''''`i.... - - • - '.'r.-- • -... .;,„1-;,•••••:t':•:. ,:„:•• •,,,--.. .'.:...-E7':';1-:: - -.• - 1 . . . F04.1k•eq.---r=..-. - 1 ::, -.....--.. .. - . ............., . -,_______,_ ... . •- - - N------- • -"..- -,:;.<c•-- - 'f':.-::::-;: -„...,1.. - . ....•:,. ... • ' I • •-•.- • . •: :.;.;,:;..:•/:••-.,..,1,-;•.;•;.2...•,f;.•:,;:, • ' .. '. . •.,._. . . . . . . . . • • • •" • • - •,,,.. ' V.. .<-'• ••1-/14)/e• ',' ; •- . - L....5631174' • . . • . . . . . . . . .. , ., . . - . ..,... .,r,. .. .. ... ,_.- . - • . .--... - - • -' -- ... • •i. '..'.-':::='.:,,--z..i..'.,..i.,I, ::?•-•:',.-1.'..: '-:' .....:. .:.. t•.:-.:.,., '. '.7-.:',-.•i: •-•-•:i.,(-.'. ..- ..:,...,,:•.,,-:,,,•::-.•y,.:,-.,',.•.•:;-...-.,..'.... -- ;:f.;: -..-;:::,:...:;....•.1-::,...;-.2.,,i,-.•,.;;.--„-; - ;-.:J..:- ....,:•.: ,.• :: •: • ' • '.--'-•--•, • - ‘'"' .-::;-/:':-.'"'-'41'.-- • -..'sY-7,..74-'4::•.- -': •-1.:-:•1:-.'..-...:,:-.;•.'.•-,2-,:'.,. : -:';', •••;:'-::.-. ..ii,';'.•'.1:. ;: ..:..,:':'.:-.".:;-_-":-....;.-i-..1'!-•:-'..:.';-:]•-:::•--.,-,1--; ...-.-•: -.7:*.:•.''''.-;''.,•,.::'.:-).,_••.;-.-.'.:-_:: '''. • '..z."'--... --_-...:,•-.,---..-• • •- - -• ••••-• - •-• - • •-- • - - •-• •-_-. ,.. , . _ . . raule.,;..1,:,-::4. -. .-.::..--7.:-.-. •••., .-_. ..-7:-.::.,7-,:,.-P' .: .. . _ .. , . , . .._ ... ... ..,_, .. _ -•'..:-..;1-•-• ' ..-: .;• I . • •.:::::.--:::: .-.'•,.;'-:.-..+. .. . ,, -..•-•‘•,•••••'„,,.• „..:.,-- . . 1. 1- .. .. . ..... . . . • . • • 1054 A aor zEGLILL- ••• •• -',.'•',2•-•:::•t.l. _. .:. .. : : , • • •. - • --.. . . ,, .. .. .. . _ • . • - ...... ....... .. .. . . ".1::i.- •• -.. ._.. ., ..•/•••" . . ' 4 • - - ii••-• et.sec... .96.krist. !.•• r* d , 1 •-• • • - ,..... . • .. i - " - ' . ' - • • - 1 r • H • i• .. . .. . • ,„,..,.....,.:._v. ,..: , 1 ..:.......„? . ..„,.....,,i . . • ) . . _. .., . . 1 . . . _....„ . _. . . . .. . - -. - . - ---- • - • - • - 1 1 . . . • . ." _I .. . 1 . . . 5 ,--,:i • . , , . , • • - ''' -; ''- . L---..-.... ----.. ..----i ,: ..• . ' ' - . , ......... .. -.. .r. , -1 . .- I .• .. - . . ,.... . .. - . .1 . - i - • . .. . . , .. ./. / . . • ' 1 .PO A 613L • ' . . .. . . ' 4 8.11 V-Pi131.• : . ---..' •. '' * . , / 7 . . • .:... , .. • • - -• • . • - •• . .- • • . . • ...r,. ._•-.. • , , .., . .. .• I. :. -... -. .. . t 4e- ,401 * - - -- •TAilt.2.::-.....'.it-. -. -_ • .... e7TCV .e./IL... . i- , . . • * * - ' • •' • - • I •- • -•• - . ., , • •* 9 5.40 R4d.P.UU1SIVIR..-,• •--1• .,1 • : • . •. . -. .. • ._ ._ . . . .. . . . . i -...-...... _ .._ . 1 -• '','*''•. . • . . . .. . - - .. '..„' '. - . • . ,.. . '' • • ' - •.. .,.... .„., .,. , '-'.•::•.=....'-'., -'.. : l • - • - • - 1- : - • - - 51m-*151.• .• - . ..•-- • -•.2-----, :.. ; . . ... .... . . • ...• . •_.„ -.. . .. - • • • • •.\, ':2' I ''' : -.•-;• -•‘..- . - .-..*:-..:-..',- :'-' .:.;:_.;•---- i'• • • -;:...--.I".--L.,.. 1• 1 . .1 : .', -**\\ . .. . . . ,. .. .. . .. - . . ,.., ..,- . . .. . • , ' •-'' -:. .-, • . •i . -..- : - •- • . 15/A.:36L. --. •. . ' .... . , - . -Tdtt..114.4:. -',• . :: ... .. . , • - -N,. •. .. . • .... ,.,.. . , . ,.. . :'.-.2.?.:1 .., ... • Nt\l • • . :- • %,: • .. - -:. ''.- - " ' • " '" '- , . - • .//441,1t..-Ne..dr" . •. .T .„ 5edb.r4(5, ..... t .,_ .., - ,.. N • , , . . . • •- • -. • . i . ., .• - • • • ' - r• - • r. •••• . - -11 • •-_,,,' - k••• ..., .1 • • i i * - • .• • • ker'S;VAL-rti•VI. S7AL r;k''t j •-•'•',-•.-1. • • . '' • , . ... , , , , .. _ . .. . - „. ._ • c- . - ...A.•••••........i r-a,c. r...i• •A,.3•2 II .s. -,-••'-'7.1 • \ . / : . .- . '';;;;',51 • • . ........_ , . , , I,- •-•-' ____. _ _ _. -.... ---..-- I• „ 17-1;-. • • .. ,...,, • , • i, ... . • ___...... _._ .. __ _ _,...1 . • ,- - 7\/.... - ,.1`-,--i----.--k*-7----- •• ' -\,, 7- ,.4 '•4'1• X. ''N' • 1 ' i''' 1 ..r. •I;Ilr;It K4gt.r6ZNae.9 1:1: DTPC7 ;1=4 1 :-.> .. ; .- i- i'.- til____y t. . - \/ r i._2(____i_ .7 • Ohl:PRI,Apf-A(.. 8.. ..,• .• 7..•••"". . .. ..... , . ..k.711-1- e•YIKII-1/-, •.- .- • .,.- • . I ------ 1 11 I • • -Alger • \ 2*- .1 . ."7. ' ...,- , • • ' 1 • • „ ___.:•_,.',.e___. ,/••. - :.. .pK20sc:ta • • .A. ' -;' -: • --- --- 1 .'___..... ' -- .. . . . •"...7-i-,.., - - ... • - ;-:1 ....•': ..---- :•.- . ...-.- - , •::-;•••1-. ,..•-•,- • .:••:. '',"•-._. -r-,-- . II; -f-,01.-1•513 .-17.,•,;(. 7 ..i„.......: - z,5•1 Aki...;'0,1:.'N I.... . •-• . _. ....,_... . A . - ..- .. ' . - . . . . • - r• - v'oc• . 1 e 4, .431 . • • - - --:- i,.. : , :•--1 ' 5 >` , _ - , - 11. ,_os4o....1:. z- . _ r• .,.. ,. • CIL . . , . r,to , I s,•u4.1Le PO-Fe.i : ....•. .., . 4.0, c,,r.f",/ . i. 71 - . . . . • ... • _ . :.) . ' • i / r • • +':„'i It• .41 , ____• •••• -- 11 ,=-I -. • i .1 ' t . . s • . . f.a . . - - '- 'i . I) .• • . - • X 1. - - : • 4 -V.....' ;i ; . • ...---...... .1 1 . •.. 4 .4 ,-..-, . • ! •11 1 . '' . . • Vi I ILL),• '7 * - t•• - .4-... ./.• At : •4ifi 'Sr • ' b " 1 -• '•-0 ,f, s , 4.4 '"C'.1r 'I;;'"•-, '.:1./.::•;.‘.-,t4*-•'-'''°PN.-:*f.1:"*...., i'\!..:K-•-•A'.;.=1'.4t'+, • • = .:,, • ,,.,..-r.,:-....,,,,z,....•--.••• ....i.a. ;F:•••••••. • 0"' #.4. , ; .,/,•,, c_\...•• I--..,6*`-. --_/' ''' •••• --4 i.' 4 ','‘' '4 '' '-• • • ... 0. Z „ rt..,. . .L ,k• 1.1., '• -.• 1.'7 iiIi7T4I-I- 4-15,1 90,oarl- i•• Tal-IK • • ' : • I • ' .• . . '.. ,I::: ..:: -'_. . --: - I . . . - ". ....• ..•i V- - : '..• . ‘‘ 14 I OTE-r i.1A I. Fi.o46.--rwc, coy 4. ..... . . ,.... • i •o•-14,7TEue:.-r"-rac.iv, -ra A,P.D • . r ii i . , -. -Jet . • . •. , ••• f .r. ,e2TD. •ta.:;0. 14-191a-q21.L CC2dEg, ..1 t . . • t . . . --•'c-•': - -- , .-. I . . i . -i „ 1 . ; • .‘ iji.TRAF-L-n-r • cal FIQL14+L ' . . • • .• .• ...: I • ',;7.4-0 . .. .i . • . c, ,• ". • - • 1.-- ,_ . ..... . : ; r-•;‘."- 7"/A tiai. - . ' ' 0 ' • • ' • I ' ' ' ' - '4'40 t :..,••• -:. .••!..-• •• :. • • . ,i. -, • . • -- . - .,.. • .--. ... ...-. •. - •• . ..• .. . .. . - •- . .-- . - . -..- . . . . . - • ... -. . . ,. . . ••- - .-. - . • . - . - • . , . ,.. . . . • . . ... .. , • •-.. . • ..• , .:•• . ' - -. . .. . ... ,. - • • •- . . . .. • .. . , . ... . . . .• ...... . . . . .. ... . . • .-..-.....-.. . ,..,-•. . . • .,• ... . . , . , , . • , . • • •• -- , . . . ", • _ , . , ,-.. . .....,. • .. _. ; . . .. ,....,.... ,....•.. • ..• ,. •- • ..; !.•..'.1,---.,'::.'r... ..:I'•.'•--2P;..-'"A.''-.',.-,--.a.."."....,.-..,,"'r...-.-*.:!.'"'..:.:13'.:.-; •.:'::.:-•-..::: -;:.•-.,,,-':•-•'-...- .'..."-, '...,..-.•• •.'.:.•:-. <;'-.'''..-;,',••-•',..-'•''..••-''.'',:-...--•'.4-:':.,',.-..-,-;-.*:,_':'.`..---•`.g.:;-.•.,.)•Vr,,,:',;•. .,...,"41.',:if...',•':!.,..-:-..'•'-';'.-.--..:1-.,.:-...-:.:--f.......,..,-;-•...4.•,':.1. ,.,..:•:':V:.•';''-.:..' = •=,.1.,;"-.'.-..•'2',.,-.:::•_`.••-'2'..,:f:::•J''-,•';‘:',-:••-.1.:':::::::•;:::::,;:-'::::,,:.-;- .•'',:--;::T,.-.:',•:::„„--..",:,';'...,J--:".;.;,•,,.,,•;:-,:',:,j'.-...-,-;,.:.','::-,'.:;•::*..,-y;:',';'..;;4-.:'..--;::'•;;::_••...'...;,:,:;.,--':.'.'-*Ji:'„:%:,- --;;:t.-,1; e:,•:;;,,j-:;,-,:,?;;,-.;,-T-;•'::-.N.;;;-•i-,.:';;:r, ;'....,•,,::.,::,.:-.-,.:$'•.,:: •,'-..-",--.:,!",:,.,',::.,,-!±,?:;-".-*;-,:?:',..;;;:';'..-,,,,!„.;,,,?.. -FL'....•;:e.,.. .,;_-.,.:..; , . . ,.`:-.F:i:-y-- •..:::,,,'-';`-_ , :,. .,4:,••,;,•1.,.;•-.,-,--,-,-,,,,,..,.,..,,,i,;i. : , ,•'...,-:-„..:..,. ..,,,..,;::::.:-,--;.:-,;•.•,-;..:„..-;•.....i;-.;,..:,-; ••.,...-.',.„•--;•:3-7.f,:;-•;,-;;`,;t-F--• '*•--1•:.••••:: :-'-;;:','.--,:'--*;-%:*f-''•••-;::*..-•'-'i'-:-'-'. •':-:',:::'''-';'2.:-:•-•,-:.:'•.?:-'.,..i.;';'i4 iZ,..'.:-...--.. .I:j;;;""ri:,-,•,,..;,-;,:;..-;::::::,-...,j,.....;;;.:,-:::P'.a6-::::-L,6': ',: ::::-1-..'-`tq. -1:.....-.i•:->':',-',;-i.:':-:-:;',...:'47,',"7..i.. ,::F,.......;•-.j'...:2.4'2.,,i.::- .-..:_...-:',,:',--...:::".f.:.i.7 i,,...-.:1.-:'_.i...:P.,.•••7:„.,;;;;;•._•••;:•;',•-•-y-:,-".77'.;• ••••:;;Ii.,,• :-•;.'-.•;•-.:..••;;•:-:,''.:;;•••::•i•e'_,••,•-••••:••.;;;;5.-:-.',;.•-,•j.:,...•;;.1.'..-2:-.y-7.;;;..•._.••e..:;•;•.j.....•1:.;•:,:;.;• 11 • " • j1:, " •- • ' ' • : " ;;••••::. . • : ;1,1 : : • •:' ".‘ " : •:."• , . ; •. '-••• : --• ; • . • .; 1 . • • : , 1. :" • "'•1:1 ••• ' •.: - ; 7,-; '1-' AMENDMENTS TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM • SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF RENTON • - , . • . „ ' - 1, 5. NAME OF PROPOSAL, IF APPLICABLE Install 50, 000 barrel gasoline storage tank _and vapor recovery unit on loading rack at Renton: Terminal. , • • - - - „. _ I. 6. -NATURE AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: . Tank to be internal covered floating roof type constructed „ according to American Petroleum Institution specification 650. Tank to be diked and protected according to recommendations of the. National Fire Protection Association ,Na. 30. The : tank will 'receive and store gasoline for distribution to .• ,r, , : •: : • .! • - customers. :•,: '• ;• Install:,gasoline terminal!' vapor, recovery system consisting: . of a vapor hose connection, vapor lock and vapor recovery , unit. The vapor hose connection. consists of four-inch • diameter flexible rubber hose with female coupler at one end • for connectionito the_vapOr return line of the tank truck. . During bottom filling ope'ration, the incoming liquid gasoline , , displaces the vapor inside the empty tank truck and pushes it • out through the vapor dome and, into the vapor hose. From • here, gasoline vapor mixture passes through the check valve, flame arrester and into the main vapor line. The• vapor line is a pipe to, convey the. gasoline vapor mixture into the • recovery unit. :Located at the lowest portion of the vapor n, line is 'a condensate tank' to collect any condensation. Any condensation on this tank!: is pumped out into the regular gasoline tanks.', The vapor recovery unit has a vapor condensor with cooling coils that could be maintained at 90°F. The gasoline_ vapor mixture paSSes !through these coils' where• ' gasoline vapor condenses and collects at the water - gasoline • separator tank. The cooling Coils are defrosted periodically , to remove water. The collected gasoline in the separator tank is transferred into One Of the regular gasoline tanks. 1. 8. ESTIMATED DAY FOR COMPLETION OF PROPOSAL; • • • • :. It is estimated that the 50,00,0 barrel gasoline storage tank • . would be completed in 19719. It is proposed that the gasoline • .r _ terminal vapor recovery system be completed by September, • 1978. • . 1.9. LIST OF ALL PERMITS,',, LICENSES( OR GOVERNMENT APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR THE PkePOSAL (Federal, State and Local -- Including Rezones) :ft 1! • For the 50,000 barrel gasoline storage tank a special permit 1-1- ,, - • , - I • •;-2 • il- .1.'1'''`,x,',:'-,T3,--"P5-T.'-..,..5,.:i-s 4,,,,,,o q-34.:1,,,,..if•-t•-,:;,...c.-Nzp„-.,,,.,,,,.4, 11,",,,,,-,--4: Z :1 ,-,,,,,-,,,,,,r,,,k-..-,s-ii:-..-,..,,;,i,-„W?';;,,..T-1,,:--..-1-:4,,:;,,,.:-g, - •, -kfz..,. .:,,,,,.,:::-.,..,,.. ''.,,`,:t.i.:;;;T:::.iS:',.:;:jirg:Zi;:7,-',.il'.Wt?:;F,g-4,7::FV::'*kr:OOK4i-1,.:A.F:f;V :?:iit?:;:';',;i-',Iiii:,,i1,::!:7i'l.S:I.L.1;;;;;,.1-1;1,7;;-.4,4'1,-:17:',.7-:1-_,'.2:-,f,11E;;=;;;;'-.•'1.if>r,:.ct,Iri;.':,:'-; :',.••-,-,':''''" '':' '':., .z.'' '' ' : : ''L-'. -v.,f''i' Y')4''Lf-r4:1:;:!,C:C':':':'''`i;':':::::'- ::;.'n'':'':':''s'IY;..1/4.C::',-'-'-:?:•::It:4;:::!'''''':--.V::(1.'''''''"I'-‘jr27.1e':q%i!4`4:::7i'Z'''',.--C`-':;?;':'''t'''''-''';'''',,,''f,l;YV:21:415-5-ei:;,Rf.-1-:' , 1-i-; :l'.:::.1;:3',.' "N.-0',,:;IP4.jil,'(•=f,,i'4:".4'':,, :,P.;4.!.' ,..',%:,§-'i-,.-,,:,:r•ri:4':.,. ., ',.A.,Z:;P:,r,"?....:`:'i-;,,=.;":.1,,,,"•:,-../...,,,,;:,i-..i,?•4",,i,::Ti..::,,:j..,,;.:?:,, ,,-1.:,,_i.iiy,.;,fc;„,..; • 1:".,i,lc,:ia.--:; -.:.,:-.,';':.;.,::..;:-.:;; ;;.0,4; !:,i.?l,',,n:.;:,6,W;::f,n::,'Xa:::;:,,j,r;',-!y4.:::::.'i:',<i.,F,. ,,,Y7i7.!;:,',.'...:,,. .;.."',S*s- •:..,,!.04,f,:-.i.:;:.!...gf,trE,'-;k,,,./..,i,:;,i':`,M'4j';'„i';',5.',- ....Itt., ,fi:3 :7':;,'I';':'r,':;;:a.:!;.,.3D1A,'n.:';''qf',;',.Za',_,1':.',','WV.,:i. ,;,::',,!i;;'',,,f,q,,.?t'',W1',2-P;F,:,iJ',I,'',;t':'. .;e'',';''''" :‘-1'-';'; ;!'''''''''''''-'';'('''-';'''-'1,.''':?'i.;',:'-'?'-..;::';,'''':,::;:,,.'"':-.';',.L...C4';:',3-!-';--;;;',". .--',---, 5,:',-''' ''; ;51,',..':4:?,{..n:1",,:.,h-;:44•?,..';N•S;•:fr.,',,J,'2,..i.4,7;.`,`. ;`,;',;,•;":,.::-.,.r;,;,ai-:::,r-,-,!.4;,,f:I;T:.„': ;; ; ,.,,,.,,,,..„..,,,,,,A--,:;•.-,;:',V,,,.'.,,, _,T,'•.'.:.•,-;4;:';',;.'kf,;-6,4,.1,,6.,21;',.',;;;;;;;j--,..;;,•;,„);...;,:::,,,,,y.,_,4".„iii..R.b„,:.i-,K;..-;,{,.:;,,,..1:;;..-i,:,,,:.,4,,.: '.;',:;."--';',":4-::"'''-';',",s'-',"•;',',',,,,,-.?•',-;-4:•:::•.,-,•:',...:::;.-:;.--'h,- ;••-',4,;;:•;.,e,-'1'-‘,:;.',..,..;'; --`,,,:-,.:',17F,,..-,-,,•,-/•5472-::17,i5M.,,,:e'3;4,7:*'..,':',,l';;V•:',',.,,i;';',7t7,.1:•I'Z'4,-;:,:-:,''', ,,,6,=?;',$'W,';',7',.,2,'--iL-':.;'„1.,',,t,T,F--,,,,,,'..'.ie.,'.::'Of:' ,.:1-'.',,,. .;:p.".',.',,„'2..;:';'. .,`,'::;::4,P',.:;.,-;!;r;;:e1;,.14:^i.:::;:41.-:?..';'4,, :-::;::.t.•::: J''''',:':::"'''''''' ''''''''''''':'5'''''t''''.°`'''''!' ::47•?4:''''''''''"'q:?:-,;-'a%':';::'''il.-'-::::?:::,i'''"'L*•:"''''' ';''!' '''''.,'-i V i,,,':,%--::: ';:"4,:::'-',4..';ii‘i'vP,,i'.41:4ii,6 ',,,:''''''S.',"..t-70-'F:::',-.. .:74P1.';',.';','S'il; .'-', .-;?ij',.i.,,;.:. .',,,,,,,:`,q.."'2t--4,',6-..-'...,. ;.:'•-..--1-y..:: -.-;;;;I:;',•,,',:-•. -::::-:';', 5.-:';, .-';;-''''"•,;i0:-..-'AW..,.:tz,:rij,•.'i-.!, ,,.:'''_,,,,,v,.;','.,.,,:,•.'2,,,', ..':.'1'.:f1;',IStif;.,!;-.',. .'..,k-e:;f:-.,=:::..4'-A:...',,,4;?.,1;:.;',T.,:::,„:',.:. f...-...:Y,':':".;...7..?.':.,.,'''', ...:'•n'`..:';-:':4-,:'' .1'1.''''j'3.-:'-';'''''''''''''-':: ;.i'•C;.=0-',!:'!.Y.f=i,;..:, -;,IS.,,r*.,.e...j.J:f.:.:3-,, .,:.-..?, -,i,>,.....,-; ,:e:'4..:,4...1,',--57,:..j.;.,`..':`.:,,,I:41r:-.:,.v..?.:-.!,-;.-: .'.r.-..,.-': ,,,,-;:,',-.... ::...,;:-,'''.'".;•,,,:;,r,..,::::1;',,,T,'.--:.:.,:•:, •'......,r,,-;('-!- :.-:.',.,i':::;:',`":',S' ?"-',,',';-:."i--..."':,.z1'.1r...0',,,iP14-',2.7:4.1.4.'•: "-.,, ',";::...L.:.'f.''..';''',......i.f,1-%?..,';5'';-:;';',..,'..,';',`-''',-,'„i''.,i:',1•:-..„':-T7.:.,' .l-i.--,,,'..T.,-,:-.,,..:A',.-:•.7..Y',..`.--..'..'...;:.,;'..., ,:,.,:rf?::'...,:,:-.,-fi.,'::-..:.2..:-;"-f.'.11,1,..,.-.;',.... ./2,..•::....:2.,v,'-'47.1,..,;::4;;; ,,..,,:,,,`,.::-..4.1:., ,,I,.4,-ai--,',.--',,,,;:',.;,-..,:'„,..;!..':'.. ., 2.,—:,..,.-,. •, -.-:.,-..;-,,,-..,-,-....-:::‘,. i.:-..A..•,,,-...,..,,,J,...;,,,.%,,,,-.--,-,...,..,..,:,.....,,.,..,f,..„....,,,.z,-,.,.,,,,,,,..-...;-,,,,,,,,.,4%.,,..;..;.....'„,.:;),-.4..;5,..'fze.... .:,,;,..,.,:,..=:%,‘,4=?:..g.,;‘,::::,,..;.='.'..'?. .1--.,,,..:.,!....-:',:.,.',,,,,•,-.,•;.--,- .g.i'.!,-;:.:J.;-!:Fi!,..,;,;:.,t,,,:....,-;.,;..,,-.,....i:4.1.7.-:,,,,,,_..•-,:,,,,,,-.;.f..,1..f.,,,,,,,A,.....,v.,-.:11:„q:.Fv.:,,,:,,;-..„;_,,,,,„1,,,..... .', ,:‘.'''''''''. ' 1':''-',i'''','''''',':: '= '-'".-- '24r!'::'''''-":``s-':r."''f--''.'''.''.::.::::;.....'ci. ;.:'.-t:i''..'-:-‘.:..'u'-,--...Z.:":4':'3',W.,..:4-V.:7.--....::-.,`;', ':-;:.:','-,'.-,,1-.'/,',;4,,,,,,.7,.:;,..:•„:-:,-;:,;,-,:',,,..'7?:'.'t.P.•.-,,,,.:..,..tA--.4:14v. ..:.,-;.j,11,,;',,'.n22:,:;:rA,,4:,,,,!,:',,..,....i-r:,..,..-::-....:;'...,,,.:::..•,---,.-:...,,,-,--..',4.._ .:.-4....:. . . . . --. . .. . , '!'f:` '.'••'''::-... ....-:' -.''''':'''::;,- .-:-..-1 - • ' :"1-...-:. . - - %.. ''''---' '•-•..: •-. ,' - ''..,'.!:.::-:•','.:.. i'-,'"I."..;-...-,.:-'-47,..,':-%".,.'";f::::',',....:?:,:-::::,•=,,---:,',..'-'-';-.72.':',1'....'.;...'-f?':.--,'..4-2.Z'.1.4?azi ..1% '1..V=.fl'i;,1.1',,1113.K. V„'....,. ...:•;. ,,'2.',-,.."::.':''..,,,.'-=':-,,.": :-::.5; .-.?-- ..-,.. "--- .;i:';',.:..-... ."..- ....'.:-.'-.!:-..,i;-',:.-.','.:i . ,', :i.•.''...:.,'':•"':-.':'-': .• :1-'...--3'.-:,'-'''';'..'=:'-"''''- '''''•'.' .'':',"'....'-'7:".":;=`,t...!:;:...,1!z,,,,,k,M,,w4-...f,4:4:., ..-,,-,.,..,..,,,-.,:;.:,',..),,:fltg,;•41--,g,;;;';',:.:4:-Z.:.. j,!..f-42-:!..-" ft:t.,-.T;::11."i..r.T5...L'..i-1..--,,-,:-. ".-1' '....; '•11:),::'-',- ". -•;:q..: ','i'.'--'4'.:.---''',',:::''-::'''':...:. :,-:-'::.',.--.'.:'',:1Z.'.'''..-..:.- ..,.:..,...`;'i j''',.....--',,i-Y.,...:..:.-''''';;:::',"-:...-':.1.--3---•:.-.?-",'‘.4-..;..'i"."::;‘..k:'''.:::...'7!:1.:?r,,'-'f.7:.,?. ,;21';'...;''..:',.:-.;'-',,'0,..:1-Tf...-i'ft..4§-4t•,t,'',';;-, .:.-!:,fT,_,,,.'..,-...:,,,.,..6-,..!.;.:.:•-:.., ,:,:.?:„.,.'...- '.,,. '.„.."-' ,'...?...---', ,-.'.-','.:•7,4'-'-.'.-.''..';'-:;"-- ''-:" ' ' ..-' ., ....'.:-':":-: •- 1 --, '.t.-:. ':''....:...':.:.:-' '::----::-.'"' 'is.::''.-z.:,:,:,.•.',',;1:,;.';;-,`-.'-f Y.::''...ri.:-:-,S),,,'r:'::::"':;:',1'i:?2'.4.r., 4.:7!,: f.'::'?-i-,;;;`3!... :'::::.--;',....:.'.::::':=.•";:'.''-.';' , . ' . ".':- ." -:-,E::Cf;.:'.7,...-.._ : . .-, -,i;__.....:_,..-;„:,_;....- _ ..'--„.-;,•':•••:• ---...:-- ,-: -.-•,,..•-•.-.-::-... ".•,.::.•-•.:.;.---:::i!:'-'-,r7izj,":-:1;-.....';,...,;;;•-;•;-,1.;-'-'1;.:.!:%•::::--,•''•:--"•'',4-....7;:1-:.•:':f,::,.•-•,',:•,--- .;::.'3'''-?;"--',•-:, ---',--- ' -,--,', '-'•- ••'''-•' :-.'. -'•- :: •;'..,i,'•:-: • ; - . ,• , ';-:,:.:. - . ,; ; ' -:- .::: 7.„,:-_.. ..'... . ; .;-,,„:,!."-:,, ,'..,:-'.:•,,,,,;;;;,Y.:.'i,--':- -, .''...r.'---,;•CA\•';,'• :••••:':P:',. :,-S.;:,',--:',- ..... ....,.. ,. . , _,,..:, - - --- ;;-.",, ;.7.--",;.•:.;_',...',,,",,,:ip,..:'••.':-=-,•...,-,:••,-):•••• , _ .., • ;•.--':' '' - • is required from the City of Renton which has been :applied. for - ... . : . SP-066-77 - August 8 , 1977. A Building Permit will be required :::-:-.. ..T.,•.:,:lE,_-„,,-,,,.,.,,,,.„ . ' from the City of Renton .for the vapor recovery unit which •• , -,r,, .,.. .,: :: ::,,,,,;.,,,,,:•,,,:::,,,,,...,,,,,.:::„..,,,..::, application has not yet been made. Both units will require: :: •:•.:' , • - approvals::from the Puget Sound Air Pollution •ControlTAgency.. -..... ..,...„,-,.. ..,..,,,,..,,,,,,,-;_-..: .1.7,,,,-.•,:o.,,,.,„„.-,,,,,,,,,..f.::, . - •-•-- .• .-,-:-.7.-„,:. •••••.: : •••,. ••••.,.-•• ••,.•- ..,..-: ••:.., ,..,;,...,-, ,,;,,,,,ir.-,,,,•3,-1-4,.-•,,,,f..-...,-,,•-•;•,,•:,.--.,,-•,•::.- , • • - •-- . -,...; :, --. •.• • - .• . .'-,-- ; '- . -':.- - . ' ':-.,', .;-...•.......-:".."--:•:,,";'•,.::::.,....--;,-'-'::;•,...:-,,,;",'..t,T'.•:.•.-,:-:-:"1.;.;','1::;.."',;;;;`,7-..ti".5:::','I'''n',,i•:::,.'-'if .'' I. 10.:',.•;_:None - :.:. -_. -. ..... ,.. .-. . - , .. • --••---•• : •--, ----;•;.-z-...--. •...-_,....-.-•-,!....,..-.-....,.,..--,••,:-......•.,•-i..,z••••• ,,fi--.•,--•:,7•••1;.••••::,;:..-.•-••••,•-•-:..,,,.•5-,•,..-?..--.-..--.-:t7,-,i-:.••,•.-•,,,,••:,..'-z-,,--:•f...-•,-2•:•,_,!?,f,. 1. 12. None • : -....,-. ....',-,-,,,-...- .-•... -- -.• ••-... , . • - .•,, .:-..• - -.• •.-.:,. ,• • ,::.--..:.-....., -....-.-.,..-.,,:....'..,,,::,.........1.,,,,.......--.,..,.'''.-',',..,5:',:'?..,!,..;!:.,..,.',.,... -,.;,,'/-.';,,02',*.v'iff-==',N,',',.=:::,,,`,7,', :,.-...„ ....,..:::-; -. --.:,-,-.:,',..;,...-7,--.-,e,:1,7*.V.F 4-1',"2,'-',.:'1:::„''-'i•:;,,,;.:i.,;"-Ei•Z;;;•;•;:7...si,--...,,,..-,:i,•,:4,.•::.-.... ,. :-•":',-k- -;,... , -3','., :•--7.;":;„:,•:;;.:•.';'..-.-.•.:.''..'''-''..,-•- ' ''.• •:-•-•:.:.:-'' : ",.:;,i.i..,-,:'--,'::',--".--'- . - '.,,-..• .,• ,:-'--;-".c•'''•;;,,-.;,'"--'..-,.....';';!.,:','.•:;-'..' •'-.'-.••,„;;,;•!:i;',..-,..-' ,;;;;;"::i'lq,;.'-',4'.-;',.",-;'.-fg..,,':-.4;14':.;tW4,;_,:r•-.;t,,,-;',,,,r,,•••; ', . . ,-..-,..;:.':,,r.'.'i.:';.;.--;_::.-,.; -...--..„:',,, ,:,•,,,;:•,--.,',,,,:,-,..1.,_',- . :',: .'.,;. - ,--. .".-,• :,,-',;_..•- ,. •' .- ,':''.:-- , - ,...,'••-..":',•-',':,•:'.,..; -,':-.-:,':-.=,,,=7.-,, '_-• :•:.;--;;;;',1•-;',--, r•,;':',.':',,,k,i'-"S••'.*-;••*-0:`41?-C7.•--•k; ;;',',-c-1,fi.:;5;tA'':::' . • : • ' ''-'-•--'-'-'':''-' ••-•'::•,:'-';','-'.--',•-•-••-”•;‘g'''''''?'''-',--•' -''•''-';'•;:;- '.-,''-''::i: '• ; •-',f'-,''!-f''-;'-'1'::'-'7,"--:- •'"•:'--,..;'••-'7'-, ..' •',...,;.'.-:., .','-.;;;-,•:'.-:•:;---."-...-,;•-',:.;;...;-.1/4-:-,,, .,,:.;:i,,,,A-pr:,...,;•:::,;'!;1,:4:,,,,,,•,,:.4-',...',•=•..-;:;:i_.14.,,F:11-,iil7:,•,,:ior-,7,-.„7:. .ye,•,.; •,,.. ' - ;-.-?':'''- - ..-..P;,-;::".:'•-,-;:- • •;'-'.•.J:','."-' : ••i•"..:::;.-;•i---'1-.;:i,",,,'.,' :...';',,.- i:::''f•:;•••',:,,"i'-•",-.••?--. ;,:--:j,,..--:".:.•:.-;',",•;'„-:,,-;',,,;•.•j'.-'-'.•'-...';',".,";','t•.'.-:,'-';''•:-7--.'\Z•-:-:').!;:-;-'''''..,•:•••••?_;..",-,;•,•:•;`,--'1::,-;.,-:",•.•,:` ,•;',.-'2';';',•: .'o47:',.-5.;.ti-;-••••z„ .';i:.:,;-&-';',;;:::C" ' , • '•'•...' .:.•:-..;'!'"‘'.;',1;;-..-.•' --•;:.-. • •-•,',..,,,::;=;;;;;;V•IFP-;`.';...;.;•':V-•,-..,::;:,,•',-.P.,;;;:,:::-.1,,-1-',":•:I ..:‘-•4';,...-;',:''.;',...:`.':...fr-•‘•-.'''.'-''.L.-,*;: :-.:....Y.':'",•.;.'":,...';,")'••''';‘,-;.';'::::,"-7.:'-',"',;.2.:;.:.;;;,'..---'..:;'.1,•:-::;:''';','",tv,.,-,•1;:'';f1,'!.';i1A::.;';••,-...,::T.,'"-,..:.:',.,::::;7•,,::",:9?‘,61-i,'.Y4.,:i.'„,"-'s"e.-1/A ::. . -:.-::::',.•:,:,-.;7-::,-;;I:," -',.:,-;.::• ".,;,,..,•-•-•:-..::, -,..:;-.•.(s).?•',..,::::::::-....:t-,:.;,-..„.•i"..-.:,:::-,':,',...---:":,•.',•:', ,'-, :,;:-2.,./..,;;.•".r,;'.7,.,..•''--;',;',;:,'",'••,-.-,:•,•;.::-„,,'2-.' ::: '..'";.';,::.'..',;:,i,::."--,.•_:'.. :':-.....':...•":,.....',;---_,-7.-./;"::„"...';:,:,..7',1.7.:;-klq.:,,.'.;',...,.. .'1...,,,,,..-...VE::_V.:::,,,,,,.;71,•„F.1.,,,,:::7...';;,'7:4 . . ..... . , _ . . . . • • . „. . ,. " - . • . ... . . ' • '.• - . .1,':c',-.'-; . .,' - -.-.'!.''','''.. '''',--- .7";:-:,:z .,_. . . . .•. .. , -....,-.:.-. • -.- .• '-- . • ' • ' . . . . . . _ .;;;.; . . . - . , .. . • . . .. . , - • . . . . . .. .• . . . . • . . • .. , ' . , . . .' .• • . . . . . . , .. , • . . \ . , \ . , : • . . ,:.. ., .. _ •.. :- . . , . ', : ,1 ;, :-, ; , . . .. . '.' •. ... .• • . . ' . .: •, • : • : - - • . i : . . . .. . . ,: ; • ,,.., ' . . . - . . . , • , . \ ' , 1 . , . . . • . . .. , . • _ . . , . ... . , .• ' • , - . __ _._ __- -- - — • , . -- '• ---- . • . . . . . . , . '- - -.. .'•••',•, .:.., . : ..- ' ; . •"..•• . ; , ,....,• ._- ....•: . . •• - . .''''• -..•••;',.- --. — - ,--::..z.:-% ''•-, -''-„.. .• . ' ' • .. . , , . • . . . . ,..; . . , . . .• - ' •, . . .. . . • , , .; ,.. . , : - .. - •. - , • .-• . ; ...-::-.- ;::2'....',;',..- -, 1,-.;''' ' . . ,. , ; ::.; •, ' •': -'' -:'.:,:-,-:.',..'.:-..f.'---.7,:.'".':.••-:,-- • . • . . . - ''':-.• '-::.,•s'• 2-'7.:'", '::,''','.;-;•---';:•:.7.-- • ' . . •• "' _ '. :, ..- -f' . • • . .-".' ', - . - • ' . „ . ' . . ' • , _ , . . 1. ' . . . , , .. • ' . -.... ..,-• , . • • ,-... •- , . . . . • , . . . •—2— . . . . . . ...., • . .,.. ...„_......._.............._.__..... . , . : .. •. ,. . ' . • . . .-... . .-,. • _ , ,......_„. ..... - , - •.-,.. .-, , . ........._ , • .• , • .. . . ,. . ... . . •. . . . . , . . . ,. . . ... „ . • .. . . • . . .. ... ''''''';--'' '''''"' ''''''''''''''''''..:`'''''''''''''''''''''-''.."-'.'•:-`,::',--.•.,—;.';'",'-'"'--,.',•,...., '!,---,:,,,,,,--,,,gz.',.. ..-..4.,•,.,.,,,,,..,.:,.e.f.rs.,,,,...-,,,,k...,•,...„-_,,,..,—...—„,.,,,,....,—.. :, .„._ _ .. _.. r/ ; 1 : :::.,, :‘, ,,,,,i, : , ,._ _ .,...,,,..,,:f; ,,, ,.,.,,,,,,, ,,: .,. ..:........................................ , . ,i,. . , ..,..;!•, ,,: ' . 1::.f.'''':::'[:.":'''''':''''''''' •'.1.7;'.- ::":'''•'":'-'-4'4:'-'':..''''';'-: .• : ..:" ; :- ; ''''-''''''•c-..-:•-• ,.:.'.... :-1,„,.:2-,:,`;, ,..,.."-ii.J•:.,i,'q,.:..:,.;,"..,',.:::'....'g,',,,e.,'7V`,,, ,.,-::;11:-1,',':', ..,'-...-..'-'., :,:.,'.--,Z;•-,--",...,,..•''., ;:.:•,,..'.:, '..i.,?!..i:• :S:!..F...-' ,'.‘‘.1'.;'11:.:?;:::„17i,.-:;:::t.'. ::-...."..1.,;,,,; \:_f:1,;':;.•4'.1::'.i.7,4,;,1,' . „.'—• ; : .: ‘,..1......... : 1,,,.. .., ,:1:,,,:,..,,,,',i,,,,, ;.'.:..,..,-.,.!:,; -:: : •; .:::,....,'. ,, ,: :: ......,,,!:,, ,':(..: ,•.*::;;-.-_,..;,•.:,-_--iY.,,,-. ',:;:,;::-..,;';.--s.:,':;.::,-,--,';.- ; ,',.:;r;.- :',;,?g.;c. +.=._'',, :g;.:'.'.: . . ;.- ' ' ':•''''' '. ;'.: si,.....:.'.;7":,.• '...', '.,...c..;;!:':-..:.•:,::-.::: :. t' , :' ' - ',:•:;Z: • :" ( 12) Housing_ Will: the,-;:proposal!-:-..affect 'existing .hoUsing-,.:,,,p(,:, :: ,,•:,. .,..y.,:;_•-_-.., ,,,:...fr,,....-. • create a demand for 'additionaY:„housing? YE MAYBE O , -, _ - -,-,.:,:::,,l-,':.,„: ,, ..:'•-, '-. .:'' ., '. K.L.-- :, : ... %-,-,3...,,:..ii Explanation : . ...,_,,• , ., . ,,,,,,. , • . ,-,•• _ ..,:, :. 2-..: :,- ':.:2:-.1;T::::Y,..:::-:.,--'.'":$;.i .7:.:0;,'ji.-A,r;: '..,:. : :: . :. : ,•,,,:-."..1,,;•:::. •....r.- .•:-. .•:. ..:- : : :- :.. :..,'• .. .-,•,:- ( 13) Transportation/Circulation.: ' Will the proposal resul t :in; .. . i,;! : •,. : • • :::- -,„,,,,,, : . _ (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? :. , .. 1r ,.... . . ,. .:, - - • -. , • -i : • YES : 'MAYBE NO (o) Effects on existing parking faci 1 i ties , or demand : for new parking? , • - , , . --` ..- . YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? • - ' TETT.: MAYBE NO , (1) Al tera ti ons- to ,present patterns of ci rcu 1 a t 1 on :9:r: . . _, ,. x: movement cf p`eople and/or goods? YES- MAY BE NO . , :,.::' ''';','; -::- ' : :- • ::::-----:''..:".',.,-;.,:;:'; i';' ":-.',,,'-'- ';'L': , , X (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic' ,';•.;: ;.. ;: " -,;:::'.;•_-: ,..•,,-,57:,Tyi,•,,,:-.,:. YES MAYBE NO 1 , ':::',:-. ' . ,'-:::::,.: :::::.'':-. ' .: ' • ' ,--' ',''..::'•i'-',-.•:',.:',';;;: :_.v.:,,:";:f: ' ;.; :: ;,;';'.::';-:::A.:V'''' :;'.',='::::',.'-',, , (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , ':..-: .- .....':,:•!..-..i,i,,,,,,-:-!,:,-;.:,,,-,:1:,. .:. ::,,.;..--.....y::, -,,-.,":::„.„,,,,:a& bicyclists or pedestrians? . - - - ...,.. ..„1...2... .LL2.,2,.,.., ..-,-- x:-.:7.-,,,„:„.1,, i,,. .,...-„,,,:.-,y...,.,:„ -_—, -,-,-- jE$,...- -TTY.Tif NOt,..' -;',451,4'..::,-:.::.. .,:-;: •, ':::::'.-:"..",2:7,:',-:::'',-f-','-!" -::-: ".::-...---":', - Explanation: (A) ronci-rtir•t-frr, 17rl. and rraff-'-1, T..7 ill ha- zprprai•Pri - -:::, ,— 11::T during construction and 'additional transbortatiOri of Detroiehni oroductS . — will increase consistent with demand. =. ' ' ; .---''' •:- '.: ':i'.:-.,';':' , - ' ' ....,( 14) Public Services . Will the proposal have an effect upon , or \ result in a need for new' oe altered governmental services . . in any of the following areas : . . . , . (a) Fire', protection? ' X 'YES MAYBE NO '. . . . (b) Police protection? , - X YES MAYBE NO :. . X.--- (c) Schools? , . YES MAYBE NO .. ., _ . " (d) - Parks Or other recreational facilities? _ 1 . ;• YES MAYBE NO • ! : (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO . _ , . (f) Other governmental services? , - X-- 'YES MAYBE NO , .. . Explanation:- . . ( 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in : • , (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? , X YES MAYBE NO . , (b) Demand upon existiog sources of energy, or require x ' the development of new sources of energy.? YES MAYBE . 1 Explanation : (b) Incremental use of fossil fuels and electric energy 1 . consistent with demands for petroleum products. . . . . . .-2 ' ( 16) Utilriies . wiir the proposal result in a need for new systems; 'or alterations to the following utilities : . - (a) Power -or- natural gas? . X__ ,'.-•,',.;:,...-- - YES MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? • YES MAYBE NO. .. • (c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO - - -. ,. _ . . _ _ _ • 5 f .r} . q- ; ` ,�.. C ad - f r ' t .. -;-,,!:',....:::,•':,.-.: ' - rra", �" ^„: s ��r:1 . kk �,k - - z -5 _ - 4 .'..5 ':.tie":. - - - - - d Sewer or septic tanks? _ ( ) (e) Storm 'pater drainage? .'.-,;';;..r. t 1=S' �1 . . . •••:. •1ffiE hT (f) -i'Sold wasite' .and disposal .....,:.-tie - - '-+L - -jr - -- -}'•`'`cr. Explanation — ( 17) 'Human Health. Wi 1.h, the proposal resr:i t i, the creation of `' any !•realth hazard or potential Health hazarc (excluding _ ;c, srental heal th)? - H.--= ••i•t - °`'°-;f '. =: s,; .'YES H.-r 5 E 1. °„s,'', • ., • xolanation : ----- : ,a :,,. - _ ray•':'`a"-''c.,,yn ,Z', ` 16 Aesthetics Will _the proposal result .in the ohstruc ice ,;. ,, ;. -,,., T _ne publ ;c or wi l I. the r:•' ;•;fight ar.y scFnic vista ar view open to `:...r •'t'''•'-'' ; proposal result- in_.:tha creation of an aescneticai:ly o-frensive "` `� .;, .";'`,A site open to public view �' ,- :. . •- - ✓:(E'S.- ..MAY BC. - 1'l 1. ,'qM,'. Explanation: __- - . ( 19) Recreation. Will .the. proposal result it an impact upon the • • quality or quar,ti,ty of existing recreati„nai opportunities? - -_ YES ri,'YEE NC Explanation: -- - (20) Archeological/Historical . gill the proposal resul _ in an alteration of a significant archeological o,,r nistorical ' `� site, structure , object or building? YES M�,;'6E NO . E x u 1 a.na t i.o o t — - -- — -- ------- • • i:`',Y:, • ` , • i;Alli.• •--. • ! _— III . SIGNATURE - ' I , the undersigned , state that to the. nest of a+y knowledge the above information is true and complete . It` is understood that the lead agency may .ritheiraw any decla- • ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist . shculd there be any willful misrEpresentation, or -..i1l ,fll lack of full disclosure on :ay part. Proponent : •' '. • ' _. --_— ks . ,ned) Stephen C. Kelly ,Gale o.'intei; - ' • ' l lt in: _ J. (3) water water -mo) AX n any al terdtiort (e)'- Discharge into surface waters , o r surface, water ,quality , including but .n3t limited to temperature , dissolved oxygen or turbidity? K_ YES MAYBE NO ground -waters , eiti)er (.g Change in the quantity. 6' ithrough direct additions cr withdrawals , or thraugh .� interception of an aquifer by Cu direct in-jection , or through. the 'a r other .substances into the gro MAYBE NO TE YES MAYBE Explanation- will th proposal re�o (4} �l���. a / ' ` `^' . f � i o ui sity of species or num�e�� o any � (a) Change « the »e' i species , grass crops ,. - species of ' flora (Including trees , . ^ ^ X , micrufluro and aquatic plants)? _ MAyBE NO d ' i f the numo*r� of any unique , rare or (b) oe wc� nn u e . X � " ' u ' —�e—��-��u,�� ' | endangered species YES R A'FDE- a0 _ ' . � (c) lntrodu�cion of oe� ,pecie� of flora' into an area , or the l replenishment of existing �\barrier �o e normal. n� ^. . � — _X- �p�cies7 yES xA,3E «U . ` | ^ i l � al crop? . . [ - ^ � i i �age of any agr cu ur , Lu)� Re �ct on » «cr ' ` ^ ^ ' -� —� vB MAYBE N7�- ``- ,Evplanation� . � | � ^ ! ' / . ' .it. 4+" _ - ;r n.h r 1' S u l t' .i - Fauna. 'r�i 11 t: e:c�p o osa e (a ) . Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers . of • • any species -of-'-fauna (birds,, lane animals. including._ '' - ' reptiles , , fisn and shellfisn-, bentnic crganisns , • y • insects orgicrofauna) - • y • YES- MAYBE iQ_ (b) Reduc.tion" of :tne•. numbers 'of' any unique , rare or ` •';,''';;` .endangered:_species...of fauna? - • • '{ . r . .. :YES _ MAYBE N0 (c) • Introduction:o'f:rnew species' of fauna into an area , . . ' or result .in--.a barrier co the migration or 'ioveTent. of fauna? ..;: ,.- . ( - .,.- YES•. •.,MAYBE. NO (d) Deteriora•tio . to existing ri'sr or wildlife naoitat? • • - " n ' • y .. 4S -...'AAYBE NO Explanation . -- •!:'•, ,,_,,•`:• . • 1, (o) Noise Will th2 proposal -increase= e.aist n? noise level-s' __ • """ -i, -.. - - _ :YES MAYBE _ :i;jc::- - > :::.;• p' Excelanati �n During construction—phase on a temporary basis ;,rit`hin.nor'_al- business • hgurs `_� - — (7) Light and Glary �i11 tme' pi pcsal pr:,cuce new light or glare? - YES MAYBE i' Explanation : — - ---- ------- - , , • (S) Land Use. I 'dill 'tne proposal result in the alteration of the' present or p'ilanned ; and use of an area? i -x .. • • . 'YES MAYBE i E:Explanation.: • -- ----. — - — - • (9) Natural Resources . II the proposal result ir. : ... • (a) Increase in the rate of use ,if any r'a_ur•al- resources? Y— ' , __ . YES MAYBE .i (b) Depletion off any +iom zer.ewahle natural resource? X . - 1 . . iES MAYBE NO - Expl anat i on: • (a) —Indire�tl,.` ,_ad adiitio.0_el.ect_ica- eYen� '11 1 a_eeded .. . ''for pumping. ---- --- --- -- -------- -- ( 10) Risk of Upset . Does tne proposal ir:vol .e a risk of ar; 'explosion or the release of hazardous s+ubs:ir•+.:es (including , but not limited to , oil , pesticides , chemici.ls or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset. c.:nuitions?- • __ • •�* YES MAYBE NO . Exp•lana'tio'n : ., There is Very small inherent risk that is present in handling, 'Storage and transportation of_2etro:leun products. — ___—_ ( 11 )',•'0-opulation'. - Will the proposal alter tne location , distri - - bution, de"nsity , or growth rate of the human population X of:.-an area? • "_ YES MAYBE Ni Explanation : • - . _,7,v ;'q '�,if i�'n a >,:-'T•,'�-::'� t_ 1;1is q�'� :tii _ .y= cs�Y.j;. R I �.1 '. I r...��_' is�' 9 I _ H�� -:fix: r .. :lei >-';=.• �G It /� - V FORM N 0 1 R E [R f � N A CK 1ST F d T L CH LI E E { H -UFI C USE 1 A 11C4L on '� -0 Enviroirurental Checklist No: PROPOSEU._.date = r: F.INAL',:.;date: Declaration-:of Significance- Declar,,tion of Significance ' DDeclaration of N-on'-Significance it D'Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS:,.. r-• Cn'''.ti its/l`_'•, - Introduction The State:;En'vironment''al Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires '>- '.:_,:`;;;iis>,';; all 'state and local, 'gover-nmental agencies`. to consider environmental values both for .their.•',;- ,•:;,;..,; : own'. actions and when:licensing'-private proposals . -. The Act also requires that an f15 be'�_;.,.. `:.;:�•;.�,,��-:;. prepared for.all major actions signI,ificantly affecting the quality of'•the environment. ,: `:.',; :*,.. _f,, The purpose of this checklist`is ,to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a -'.-` ' ;:. ' =' proposal.:;•i,s such- a major' action. ' I . Please answer the following questions 'as lcoiipletely 'as you can with the' information ' : I presently available to you. Where' explanations of your answers are required, or where' you believe an explanation_'would . be helpful,- to government decision makers, include your . . explanation in the spade 'prov-ided, or use-additional pages if necessary. You should - include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant ,to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these,questions now will help all . agencies involved with your proposal to Undertake the required'environmental review with- out ,unnecessary delay.. .,. 1 ' _ , The following questions 'apply to your total proposal . not just to the license for -which you are currently:' applying or the 'proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers ' should include the impacts which will be caused by ,your proposal when It is completed.' even though completion may not occur until sometime + in .the future. This will allow all • of the agencies which will be involved to complete .their environmental review now, with- uut.duplicating paperwork' in the future. ', , NOTE: this is a 'standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of. Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may-not apply to ' • - your proposal . If. a question does hot apply . just answer it "no" and continue. on_ to the next question. - ENV IRONMENTIAL CHECF:LIST FORM - 1 1 . BACKGROUND. • I. Name .of Proponent Mobil Oil- Corporation __ 0. • ' 1. Address .and phone number of IJroponent : • 612 South Flower .Street, L. A. , Cal. 90017 213/683-6335 Stephen C. Kelly,--:Attorney _for Petition, 1103_ IBM Bldg. ' Seattle, WA. , 98101 206/624-7371 ..3. Date Checklist submitted I' 4. Agency requkri ng Checklist City of Renton /Depfi: of �co[ogy . 5. Name ofproposal , if applicable: . . ' ' Irn•s'tal1,,.50, 000—barrel ' gasoline storage tank. Renton Terminal • 1SS �i- heal,; m 'In''' -I- - 6. Nature Andebr.ieta de trip ion of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements. and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): . CSee'attached amendments) - Tank to k. ir►tr-rna1_aLrc rnri flnati,ng rnnf .type cnntrurpri - according to American Petroleum Institute specification 650. -Tank —o be diked) and .,protected according to , recommendations • of the National Fire 'Proteri-ion Assoeiai-ion No_ in_ Tank • will receive and; store gasoline. for distribution to customers.' - , - J - i 1 , \' • : . '5''-''.r . `Ai;•,:!::;±.,:::.•" ''-',T.'" ,!;ja''.;':.!,,r:`:;','.,:t„'-,•, = '1.,,,,,i. .. ce.r.,-.19.,:w-:- - ..:... .....:.-:. : .• .':.;;4;'., :,,'..;-;.*; : '..;f s,: :.,:antrgYnif '.ilf:4c.T.'.:T;::: ,!:".'r:',-;:: ., "":'',;::';',:.-. ::: '?''', ;,--:":';' -',.i.:`,:r:',':'-3':: .j-•:-,r:.,,i:z,N'Yi',':',,,1-`,,(4,,;,'.-r:;,;,;,:r.',;,:;',,.1'N.:,,'- '.'; ,,,,,,,,e1, ,. % ,.,_-,-.-:•,'-:1- ' ' ',.:'..':,,i;,'.',' ;.,-.: -..;., .;:',n';'',!,'T,':;;I:::.;''''`,'''6§;ic';',•:.,:V.-.:•,f2Ti.,,•A1.:7-,F.-.!',.:. :'•',' :..:•-•: ...;:, .;:.i';,.•..-.'•:', :•,:y.,-,•:-R.kr:', ..;-.:ej ::'Z,,i,:' , 4••••, .. 'F,'....,'•• •,''P:A54.‘.•'',2-'3': ' ...!ek,1 z,'''. ';1=-1.,/..•::',...-,.-",-,'.:,:---.4•;•";.2- '• - . .• ''-•', ":;::::;...•,-.,•:-, _!,1•4 .'-',..,.:'.'.-cs.-.:,?..,;,?..1.:;'i•S';an•-,:-..-),•-.:'-. :-..-:::: :.:,•.5::;:,:. 5,,;:t1 . ,- • • . - : . -,:-..,.31:-, ..-:',:•.,':•:,•'e•,',-,, .,'„,:.:-.•:44'.L.,,.;:"•.•:.; - " . --; :, ' • :::::•'-,"",-,::-;,sii r.•:. ',.,:-; '..:;• :'' ' ':.',:..-;...'.': ;!.:...,; :::.;.;:,:.:: :'...-.7":: ''''' f..:.?.';',-,: • . • - : ... , ,:,,,,.....„;,?,..,..:,,,,,: .,‘:,,I,s:z_.: , 1.,,,,,,, .: .,..,..r..4,:,:.:.,-.;; ,, : • :,..: : :• :.. 1:,...:,...,::.;;: . .. --- i. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposals as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including • : any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the 'proposal ) : . On Lind Ave. S'.W.: approximately 1, 000 ' South of S.W. 23rd St.• -arid-Z-174—riir1-6§-7Witillt-W-Of--erie-CitfTite , , 11__aares..a_f_L_Ind.... ____.. ___ :.__ . . . • „ 8. Estimated date for Completion of the proposal • - • _ Sep_tpinjiqs, __1978 38Pttact4e-cl. an:ten-drnents) . . i). List of all.-permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal --, ' :- . (federal , state andAocat--including rezones) : _ . . . • . , , • __Dp.t—o.f__E.colos4y,,__Ruge_t__Sound._211r.__PaLlution.S'ontrol_ Agency__, •;.,, ,,. - . - --.--. and City of Renton. ----- ----- - Flood Control- Zone 1321211LSSee attabcad_amendments) -- - ----- - :..,..,..;:.a., .•..;;-.,:',:-.,,,,-.: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions-, expansion, or further activity : related to or connected with this proposal? If yes. explain:. -- - .. . . . __________•___ , -- _--, . • 11 . Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ?-' If yes , explain: ..titl , • . I . 12. Attach any other' application form :that has been completed regarding the pro- ' posal ; if' none has been completed ; but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such .application form: _____ _-- : ----4------ — — • ..1 , ----NICIMF________________ _; ___ _..____ _____ , ' 1 , ____ ...... —,-- . . . • , r .k. ,• ,..: . , _ . . ,- _ ..._.... . . • It . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS . -.• , (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) -. . . . . ( 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in chanyes • in geologic substructures? • • . , MAYBE 14-0— - • . • (b) 'Uis'ruptions, displacemepts , compaction or oi,er- • covering of the soil? _X.--. , _YES MAYBE NO , — . ..„ . (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? . X • YES MAYBE NO (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any • untqiie,..-aeologic or physical features? X 'vrs..— RI T ITT 0- . (e),:•.1A6Y inci-ease in wind or water erosion of soils , - either' on .or off the site? , X ______ YES MAYBE Wo .:.-., (f) kChangeS -in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or hinges in siltation, deposition or erosion which s'xmay modify the channel of a river or stream or the • . bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X STS— RAW N-O--- • Expi anaii an: ' (b) IIi_ Ht-tipticins 'connerterl with c.rPrtj on of a ____. petroleum ,storage _tank. . . -----..-.....---..- --.....--- . . . , . . •.- ' ... A j NOTICE OF COMPLETION I-. G. cli "-- 1'' . RNI r i Regulation I, Section 6.09(a), requires that the owner or applicant notify the Agency of the completion of the work covered by the application and when its operation will begin. This form is provided for your convenience to assist you in complying with this part of the Regulatioin. I 1 APPLICANT or OWNER SECTION ' Mail to: Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Plan Review Section 410 West Harrison Street P.O. Box 9863 Seattle, Washington 98109 • (Gentlemen: • The project described below was completed on and will be in operation on Signature of Owner and/or Applicant 1 Title Date I ;FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Notice of Construction No. 1769 Project Description: 50,000 BBL 95' Dia x 40' Unleaded Gasoline Storage Tank with Ul trafl ate Corporation Floating Roof t 1 i Owner's Name Mobil Oil Corporation Location Approx. 1,000 Feet South of Future Intersection of SW 23rd St, & Lind Ave, SW ❑ Inspector check ❑ Engineer and Inspector check . I Follow-up (Estimated Completion Date Plus 7) Date Inspected Inspector REMARKS: 1 1 . ❑ See Attachment I FORM 63-11.1 5/76 41 STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY WASHINGTON 4350 150th Ave.N.E.,Redmond,Washington 98052 206;885 1900 r., Dixy Lee Ray ^�--—r Governor I ' January 19, 1978 Mobil Oil Corporation 612 South Flower Street Los Angeles, California 90017 Gentlemen: Enclosed are the original and one copy of Flood Control Zone Permit No. 1-2772-2 for the purpose of construction of a 50,000 barrel gasoline storage tank. Please sign both copies on the reverse side as permittee, retain the original, and return the copy to this department. The permit does not become effective until said copy is received. The enclosed permit should not be considered a permit under the Shore- line Management Act of 1971. Sincerely, ROY C. BISHOP -- Resource Management RCB:jw Enclosures cc: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Dept. , Renton King County Hydraulics RED PECRIED o�, JAN 18 1978 4/ 3 . -- - -- - - ------------- PERMIT NO...J.-27.72-.2 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON Permit c mit is granted under provisions of Ch. 86.16 RCW, this 19.th day of Janaury , 19....7.s, to MOBIL OIL CORPORATION (Name of applicant) 612 South Flower Street, Los AngeiQS-,.__Oalifornia..90.017 (Address) to construct and maintain 50,000 Barrel Gasol.ine .Starage..Tank (Description of works) • fcr the period , 19_......... to 19 or in..-perpetuity in. NWI4NA Section.....34.....; Township 23....N. Range---5...E.. W.M. • on Green River , which said works, structures and improvements are located within Green....... ( ame or stream or flood plain affected) Ftcc;d-`Control Zone No 2 , all in accordance with Application No 2173 and plans attached thereto on file with the Department of Ecology, which application, with plans attached, is made a part hereof. The work herein authorized may commence on or before the 19th day of January 19 78 hand shall be completed on or before the 19th day of January , 1980 or before such dates as may be specified by any extensions granted. This permit is subject to the conditions printed on the reverse hereof. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. :c: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Dept,Renton -; �,: � �` King County Hydraulics RZFBERT K. MMCORMl ::.Regional Manager ECY 050-6 - THIS PERMIT is subject to the I ving conditions, which are hereby accept, ad agreed to by the permittee: ' r 1. This permit is granted under authority of Chapter 159, Session Laws of 1935. (Ch. 86.16 RCW.) 2. No property rights are granted herein, nor does this permit absolve permittee from liability for any damages which may be suffered to life or to property, public or private, by reason of works, structures and improvements authorized liereunder. • 3. This permit does not obviate the necessity iof obtaining assent of the Federal Government in case of United St=;t,?s navigable waters. 4. The permittee shall remove. at his own expense, all falseworks, structures and materials incident to the construction of the work herein authorized. Works and structures erected under permit covering a specific period of time shall be removed by the permittee at his own expense upon the expiration of said period or at the expiration of any extension of time which may be granted. . 5. Should permittee fail to remove, at the proper time, materials, works and structures referred to under paragraph 4. the Director reserves the right to have it done at the expense of the permittee. 6. Any alteration of plans for works and structures made subsequent to the filing of application or the issuance of permit shall be subject to approval by the Director. . 7. The Director shall be notified by the permittee of the completion of works under this permit in order that he may make final inspection and give final approval. 8. This permit is 'subject to further special conditions as follows: • 9. This permit is accepted subject to provisions of law and regulations and conditions herein prescribed. (Permittee) • By 1 King County Sty; _ 'f Washington • I '- John D.Spellman,County Executive r L�'. '� %, ,i Department of Public Works (s peggJean L. DeSpain, Director l)///1://(:7 '•µ;r. 900 King County Administration Building )//1 " ,°:_A500 Fourth Avenue Seattle,Washington 98104 i • • January 3 , 1978 • Mr . Duane Wegner AN-1 pciliE0 t u.Department of Ecology .1 Northwest Regional Office • JAN 6 4350 150th Northeast • IS W • Redmond, Washington 98052 \\\ Dear Mr . Wegner : „ ��.:7DEP� • We are enclosing a State Flood. Control Zone application and plans submitted to this office byi;llMobile Oil Company for the construction • of a 50,000 gallon bulk storage tank in Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. • ' • We have reviewed the proposed construction and submit the following _ comments : , 1 . For compliance with the East Side Green River • Watershed Project any structure within this ' site must be flood proofed to elevation 14 .4 ' feet (Mean Sea Level Datum) . It must be noted that until such time as the Green River Watershed Project is constructed to the extent that it would fully serve this ' property, flooding could occur at elevation _ 14 .4 feet and somewhat higher. 2. The existing. 100-year frequency flood plain according to the Soil Conservation Service' s Flood Plain Study is 21. 8 feet (MSLD) at the subject site. The storage tanks are shown to be flood proofed to elevation 24 . 0 feet . • However , the approval of this development on • the basis of flood proofing to above the existing 100-year frequency flood plain along • • Ii 1 • , Mr . Duane Wegner Page two Mobile Oil Co. January 3 , 1978 4' t • with the approval of other applications will result in a higher elevation for the 100-year frequency flood plain because of the reduction in the storage area for flood waters unless improvements are made ,to provide for discharge of the flood waters from the flood plain. 3 , Additional improvements to this site will require State Flood Control Permits . • • If you have any questions regarding the above comments , please feel free to contact Mr. Larry Gibbons of this office on- 344-3874 . • Very truly yours , • • WILLIAM B. GILLESPIE Division Engineer Division of Hydraulics WE G BG/_SK/bb Enclosures : FCZA Plans Topography map • cc : / Mr . Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director City of Renton w � ®F RF1 •► - THE CITY OF RENTON V t/i* MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 < 2,1 • CHARLES J. DELAURENTI• MAYOR • PL.ANNING DEPARTMENT 10 e ®�� December 12 , 1977 235-2550 Ore® SEP-t‘t Stewart A. Messman Department of Ecology _ - - - 4350 150th Avenue N. E . Redmond , Washington 98052 -- RE : ECF FOR MOBIL OIL CORPORATION INSTALLATION OF 50 ,000 BARREL GASOLINE STORAGE TANK AND' VAPOR RECOVERY UNIT ON LOADING RACK AT RENTON TERMINAL + - Dear Mr. Messman : This department has received and reviewed the subject environmental checklist form and the proposed declaration of non-significance issued November 10 , 1977 , by the Department of Ecology. It appears from review of the checklist that this is an addition within the existing diked tank farm area and does hot represent a major expansion either within or beyond the existing diked area . It is our understanding that the applicant will include a vapor recovery system and floating tank roofs , together with all the necessary safety devices to meet City of Renton and other appli - cable standards . This will significantly reduce the environmental impact of the proposed project as well as the existing facility . We also understand the proposed 50 , 000 barrel tank will be con- structed entirely within the existing diked area and that the project will conform to all of the City ' s bulk storage regulations . One primary concern that the City has is with regard to proper visual screening and buffering 'of the site . The site is adjacent to proposed industrial park and light industrial areas and is highly visible from the residential hillside and surrounding \ ' • properties . This department concurs in the proposed declaration of non-signifi - cance , provided proper landscape screening and buffering is pro- vided around the subject site in conjunction with the special / permit for a bulk storage facility required by the City of Renton . If you have any further questions , please contact this department . Very/"truly yours , //Go►�dorl Y. r ksen -� \\\ Planning irector li GYE : MLS :wr cc : Building Division 0 . • FORM FOR [PROPOSED/ >I;M] DECLARATION of [ DG EJOAKE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE] I)('j )U• 1!;is • • Description of proposal Install 50,000 barrel ) gasoline storage tank & vapor recovery unit on loading rack at Renton Terminal Proponent - -- --Mobi;l Oi I Corporation Location of Proposal II acres of land on Lind Ave. S. W. , Renton, WA Lead Agency Department of Ecology This proposal has been determined to [-#iaee'not have] a significant adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS [,a /is not] required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This Hdecision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other in- formation on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Stew Messman / Position/Title Regional Supervisor for Environmental Quality Date November 10, 1977 Signature 2- !-f `jam DISTRIBUTION: Project File/Environmental Review DOE King County, Division of Hydraulics City of Renton, Planning Department)/ . • Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Attn: John Anderson �: 0 c� • • -o • ECY 010-4-I06 `,/O ' `/ �' LAW OFFICES OF � �,,,,, , �i�\77/.... WATSON & KELLY U1 _ \ I 1103 IBM BUILDING %') 1 (l l'IOV SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 98101 �( p �" e.. r?l (206)624-7371 i, !, \�• qN �'�. � � November 23, 1977 Mr. Mike Smith Planning Department City of Renton Renton WA 98055 Re: Mobil Oil Corporation - Bulk Storage Facility Dear Mike: I appreciate your taking the time to meet with me on Monday, November 21, 1977 , regarding Mobil' s special permit application No. SP-066-77 . As we discussed, within the last week Mobil has decided to convert one of its distilate tanks (diesel) to a gasoline tank. This conversion involves installing an internal floating roof, identical to that to be installed in the proposed new tank, and piping changes to permit product drawn from that tank to be run through the vapor recovery unit to be installed. I have discussed this matter with Mr. Gonnason of the Building Department and have reviewed the Renton Bulk Storage Ordinance. Based upon this conversation and review, I believe a building permit must be obtained from the City of Renton for this con- version. In addition, the Puget Sound Control Agency must grant approval. As we also discussed on Monday, the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, has accepted a modification to the manner in which one computes emissions from internal floating roof tanks. This change was based upon studies done by Chicago Bridge and Iron and the Western Oil and Gas Association. The modification to the floating roof tank emission factor results in a 75% reduc- tion in the emissions associated with tank losses. Thus , on page 2 of the Summary of the Emissions, dated 6/29/77, tankage losses are reduced to approximately 8 tons per year rather than 32 tons per year. With the conversion of the 15 , 000 barrel storage tank, noted as tank 5 on your drawings , presently used for storage of diesel, total emissions will not rise by more than 1 ton per year upon the conversion of this tank. It is my understanding that you anticipate hearings being held on the special permit application of Mobil sometime in January, f, r' WATSON C KELLY Mr. Mike Smith 1103 I B M Hru nua 9EATTLI:,l�ASHIIGTOA'08101 November 23, 1977 Page 2 1978 . If I can be of any assistance or answer any questions regarding the special permit application or the conversion of the existing tank, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely yours , f Steshen C. Kell SCK:djb LACY OFFICES OF WATSON & KELLY 1103 IBM BUILDING SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101 (206)624-7371 October 26 , 1977 Mr. Mike Smith Planning Department City of Renton City Hall Renton WA 98055 Re: SP-066-77 Dear Mr. Smith: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Renton and the Department of Ecology that there will be a review of Mobil Oil Corporation' s proposal to construct a 50, 000 barrel gasoline storage tank and install a vapor recovery at its Renton Terminal, simultaneously, I enclose an amended Envir- onmental Checklist which references the vapor recovery unit. You have already been presented with a booklet outlining the vapor recovery unit in some detail. At the present time, Mobil is preparing plans and specifications for the vapor recovery unit to be submitted to the Building Department pursuant to the City' s determination that only a Building Permit must be obtained for the vapor recovery unit. Upon completion of these drawings an application for a Building Permit will be submitted. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely you , Stephen C. Kelly SCK:djb Enclosure ks OCT 31 1977 AMENDMENTS TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF RENTON c��/ I . 5. NAME OF PROPOSAL, IF APPLICABLE: \G DEpP'%/ Install 50, 000 barrel gasoline storage tank and vapor recovery unit on loading rack at Renton Terminal. I. 6 . NATURE AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Tank to be internal covered floating roof type constructed according to American Petroleum Institution specification 650 . Tank to be diked and protected according to recommendations of the National Fire Protection Association No. 30. The tank will receive and store gasoline for distribution to customers. Install gasoline terminal vapor recovery system consisting of a vapor hose connection, vapor lock and vapor recovery unit. The vapor hose connection consists of four-inch diameter flexible rubber hose with female coupler at one end for connection to the vapor return line of the tank truck. During bottom filling operation, the incoming liquid gasoline displaces the vapor inside the empty tank truck and pushes it out through the vapor dome and into the vapor hose. From here, gasoline vapor mixture passes through the check valve, flame arrester and into the main vapor line. The vapor line is a pipe to convey the gasoline vapor mixture into the .recovery unit. Located at the lowest portion of the vapor line is a condensate tank to collect any condensation. Any condensation on this tank is pumped out into the regular gasoline tanks. The vapor recovery unit has a vapor condensor with cooling coils that could be maintained at-90°F. The gasoli-ne vapor mixture passes through these coils where gasoline vapor condenses and collects at the water - gasoline separator tank. The cooling coils are defrosted periodically to remove water. The collected gasoline in the separator tank is transferred into one of the regular gasoline tanks. I. 8. ESTIMATED DAY FOR COMPLETION OF PROPOSAL: It is estimated that the 50 ,000 barrel gasoline storage tank would be completed in 1979. It is proposed that the gasoline terminal vapor recovery system be completed by September, 1978 . I . 9. LIST OF ALL PERMITS, LICENSES OR GOVERNMENT APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSAL (Federal, State and Local -- Including Rezones) : For the 50, 000 barrel gasoline storage tank a special permit -1- is required from the City of Renton which has been applied for - SP-066-77 - August 8 , 1977 . A Building Permit will be required from the City of Renton for . the vapor recovery unit which application has not yet been made. Both units will require approvals from the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency. 1. 10. None 7.49 c:atin�� m.,r..t i r I. 12. None • • • -2- • FORM FOR [PROPOSED/ jta.] DECLARATION Stall of [)) OI OE'NON-SIGNIFICANCE] Deart of 1---,cc 45TA] _ o Description of proposal Install 50,000 barrel ) gasoline storage tank & vapor recovery unit on loading rackat Renton Terminal Proponent Mobil Oil Corporation Location of Proposal II acres of land on Lind Ave: S. W. , Renton, WA Lead Agency Department of Ecology _ This proposal has been. determined to [hare/not have] a. significant adverse impact upon the environment. 'An EIS [Wis not] required 1 under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other in- formation on file with the lead agency., Responsible Official Stew Messman Position/Title 'Regional Supervisor for Environmental Quality Date . November 10, 1977 Signature 4/ % Cure DISTRIBUTION: Project File/Environmental Review DOE King County, Division of Hydraulics City of Renton, Planning Department!'" ' Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Attn: John Anderson OF {Qt f1 Pti,FIVEb ° NOV ECY 010-4-106 ivG DEPC"'R ' Daniel -EvansGovernor John A. 81ggs, Director O!vmpia.Washington 98504 Tal;aphone (206) 753-2800 ► o THE CITY OF RENTON C.) •01:' 2 . MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 F _ p n ;w4 0f O ;; -., CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4 December 12 , 1977 235-2550 ',4TFO SEPI'‘.4O Stewart A . Messman Department of Ecology 4350 150th Avenue N . E . Redmond , Washington 98052 RE : ECF FOR MOBIL OIL CORPORATION INSTALLATION OF 50 , 000 BARREL GASOLINE STORAGE TANK AND VAPOR RECOVERY UNIT ON LOADING RACK AT RENTON TERMINAL — —� Dear Mr. Messman : This department has received and reviewed the subject environmental checklist form and the proposed declaration of non-significance issued November 10 , 1977 , by the Department of Ecology . It appears from review of the checklist that this is an addition within the existing diked tank farm area and does not represent a major expansion either within or beyond the existing diked area . It is our understanding that the applicant will include a vapor recovery system and floating tank roofs , together with all the necessary safety devices to meet City of Renton and other appli - cable standards . This will significantly reduce the environmental impact of the proposed project as well as the existing facility . We also understand the proposed 50 , 000 barrel tank will be con- structed entirely within the existing diked area and that the project will conform to all of the City ' s bulk storage regulations . One primary concern that the City has is with regard to proper visual screening and buffering of the site . The site is adjacent to proposed industrial park and light industrial areas and is highly visible from the residential hillside and surrounding properties . This department concurs in the proposed declaration of non-signifi - cance , provided proper landscape screening and buffering is pro- vided around the subject site in conjunction with the special permit for a bulk storage facility required by the City of Renton . If you have any further questions , please contact this department . Very/trul.y yours , l Gar-do-n Y . / ri ksen Planning eirector �f GYE : MLS : wr ✓ cc : Building Division 1 i • I • • l • I" t • I $I�• - -•- -- ---- -.� IQPu,<^CHQS,0 FROM .6U/,jU iTQN NU�4THFR - /974--- 1 f FoON dQ.�--= �—'3Co9.�9' 'N. ".\\.(.4 - :: : It • r , , opt /n. *r5�. 1 I, a f• rain. :: 1 • I • • . .. ri n : t \T.,; __ .; , , • I Lioach I ' - \ 1 . \4t \,.6 t\i-1 I' r TLIK. r/` 10-M 6$5L (481A 45P3,1... `4t=fo•40v T1Bdr. r ! 1 i • tHft ; � ? 1 • r 35/l1 *OIL. II 1 fi : - , • N\.�, 'u � .� i�t�a�. wit` Tdt. 4��'a+.p�v" ,� e� _� __ R� 1AL't giccg imL i. lbl ,,' • -"I"— y —\•- ,,f• `T; �'y_��i .•-C-� 'X..., �i• r (�r �^[J•fG 4r'$ ',t- (`1 e1/. 11 I r --t---t __L-'.' •,' ��_ v� j Y. L IY�1, 7 OP1+1�1(tJJ�[� pi KG 4 4,,,ra'ETc {=� ti ,I I � ., .. j -- -\ ---- • / ' _ �-, .�++ ern �v ` '1 '4 � o :P�a'oi�D .. • !� J t 0Li'asp .r :c�'15 4 � I I, a` • ®' i (I. l X to • I. — • • t • t ' is • e' N1 —� .ak,,c-Ir - •-.1 ' . .1.Y_:a :#i. `<'..' - ' " `5.v 0 /° a :s r •ter 4Ar _\ x_., ."... - 4J • • 1 n ! I • k • •f I � ' h.--'.-_1 `� �l ,! :: .D -M.It, a' •40 .V . .I I e,04e,TRJ.r TAI-i T7 . L t II 1 OCT 31 • 77 f7 ! •.r h . . ! RL cNIZ U. IFiC E1AL I r 74=o '��NG DEj- Jr r- I /,------9---i / _.. .. 1 1 S U 1 t, s t I if 1I L--.-_, R.I.L.1,--/___" st, _44-3 \,._' I I5 +.► z1 {tSf( f== --11 I , �III t41 , i1 . I I._� yisri G UI.yr,I3c-Ol`(tt�('IC -f► C':c , I Ow P,he1IPle AcoS1 [ � \ 'y 11 . 1' -.----..._ - --- c \\ a� F1iI,1) ° f .4 OCT 31 1977V 1'6 11 . 11 , , ,�1 I �> :. 1. _,..„...,,,, oc,s-, %,-7./p.,,t, y„,,, \ -_G DEPP I _ -l 1 j, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2 �. o WARREN C GONNASON, P.E. • DIRECTOR "' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 206 235.1569 5) CO. O t�Q• 9Alt° SE Pit August 9, 1977 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR Watson, Kelly &Holcomb 1103 IBM Building Seattle, Washington 98101 Attention: Mr. Stephen C. Kelly Subject: Proposed Edwards Hydro Carbon Vapor Recovery Unit to be Installed by Mobil Oil Corporation Gentlemen: In response to your fetter of July 28, 1977, we find the unit proposed acceptable. However, it will be the responsibility of Mobil Oil to install a unit capable of meeting the emission standards as established by ordinance and having this certified by a qualified engineer. Sincerely, Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. Public Works Director WCG/RGN/mp cc: Planning Department ✓/ RF