Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-09-113 5 of 7_Misc{~ Q . ' ' , Q ' I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I : •• :·:" . . . - ·-"' V _-;. -,·r ~ ,'. .I .. ... __ .,. -.-=·-.·:j ' .. ). i· ... 'fr ~. •• i I I I ' • i I I (4~ ! I ' ' I I I I I ' ,, I ,. •, .. - ' / T .. I I I I I I I I I Rogers, Carol From: Ohrmundt, Ginger Sent: To: Thursday, December 18, 2003 11 :37 AM Rogers, Carol Subject: Names/Addresses to be added to L01 P0016/L03RE038 Hi Carol, Below are the names that we discussed via phone. Michael Rae Cooke 13125 -158th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 Michelle Hagerman 13710 -156th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 Duana Kolouskova Johns Monroe Mitsunga PLLC 1500 -114th Ave. SE, #102 Bellevue, WA 98004 Scott D. Baker 7018 -47th Ave. NE Seattle, WA 98115 Mark Costello 13012 -158th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 Diana Kazele 15657 SE 137th Pl. Renton, WA 98059 Mark Heckert Habitat Technologies 606 E. Main St. Puyallup, WA 98371-1088 David Rockabrand Four Creeks UAC 11427 -162nd Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 Alex Weitz 15646 SE 138th Pl. Renton, WA 98059 Jim McDougal 14502 -167th Pl. SE Renton, WA 98059 Gary Norris Gary Struthers & Associates 3150 Richards Rd., #100 Bellevue, WA 98005 1 Rogers, Carol From: Ohrmundt, Ginger Sent: To: Thursday, December 18, 2003 11 :37 AM Rogers, Carol Subject: Names/Addresses to be added to L01 P0016/L03RE038 Hi Carol, Below are the names that we discussed via phone. Michael Rae Cooke 13125 • 158th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 Michelle Hagerman 13710 • 156th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 Duana Kolouskova Johns Monroe Mitsunga PLLC 1500 • 114th Ave. SE, #102 Bellevue, WA 98004 Scott D. Baker 7018 • 47th Ave. NE Seattle, WA 98115 Mark Costello 13012 • 158th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 Diana Kazele 15657 SE 137th Pl. Renton, WA 98059 Mark Heckert Habitat Technologies 606 E. Main St. Puyallup, WA 98371-1088 David Rockabrand Four Creeks UAC 11427 • 162nd Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 Alex Weitz 15646 SE 138th Pl. Renton, WA 98059 Jim McDougal 14502 • 167th Pl. SE Renton, WA 98059 Gary Norris Gary Struthers & Associates 3150 Richards Rd., #100 Bellevue, WA 98005 1 Rogers, Carol From: Ohrmundt, Ginger Sent: To: Thursday, December 18, 2003 11 :37 AM Rogers, Carol Subject: Names/Addresses to be added to L01 P0016/L03RE038 Hi Carol, Below are the names that we discussed via phone. Michael Rae Cooke 13125-158th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 Michelle Hagerman 13710 -156th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 Duana Kolouskova Johns Monroe Mitsunga PLLC 1500 -114th Ave. SE, #102 Bellevue, WA 98004 Scott D. Baker 7018 -47th Ave. NE Seattle, WA 98115 Mark Costello 13012 -158th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 Diana Kazele 15657 SE 137th Pl. Renton, WA 98059 Mark Heckert Habitat Technologies 606 E. Main St. Puyallup, WA 98371-1088 David Rockabrand Four Creeks UAC 11427 -162nd Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 Alex Weitz 15646 SE 138th Pl. Renton, WA 98059 Jim McDougal 14502 -167th Pl. SE Renton, WA 98059 Gary Norris Gary Struthers & Associates 3150 Richards Rd., #100 Bellevue, WA 98005 1 i-- ----= == = =. = == == === = = = = = ==·== === == ====== == == == = ======== Please_ send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning tli5a€gli~t@.u Vi @@ File Nt>.'s: L01TY401 & L01P0016 -Evendell Rezone & Plat l.ni 0, .. ; f •i<>Qi N~e: \jAu:£1~ MfiJJj_µc5 ~• ' ~~ . -, --7 '· K.C. D.O.E.S. '22J7.?.5Pb ~ -W0::::: tjfo'Sf? Telephone No.: /! ·, F96\•pn\ll0. lp\Type-4 -~a 7/11/96·9 ,40,M/dj ----+-----t------------ --------- ··---4-------------- ~------------- --·-------------- ----------4------- ---..... ----------------------- -----___ .._ ______ --- ~----------- ------- ------- .. ·- ---· ----:---- ----·====·=======· --===·· ====·=--?B°P'= -=-=----=""=============·. - ; PJensc """ mo "°''"~"'" or mo ,,bu, "'"''"' """ ,mcr ,m,w "°""" oo~enu,g tlm,ii,1,<Jua',~ '\ii ~ I Filo No', O!TY401 & LO!P0016 -E,end,11 ...... & Plat \s{i~ ;i-: \ ,cm \ ------------------ LGJ~ fiiMJ,}CS " ' K..C. o.o.E.S- ---------l -·-t ·----: ---'W"'-=rt:-:::.,____+qil"'-'v"--5&':..-=_ Telephone No.: ,. -----F96\apu\ll0. lp\Type-4 .noa 1/U/96-!h4'AM/dj ----------i -,------------ --: -~-------------- --.-----------.---------- --------·-+--:---_...:...._ ___ --·---------__ -..f. __ --- -------------- --------------------· --------_......._ -----·------ --------:--- .---- .,.....--• ---------··.-----,---- ----~ ---l------. -------• .! --.. ----_______ ,_:.,..__ ---.--- -.----~-------------,;.. ·-·-· ;/ ·• -;. tJ ; _J ,_ ·, ------------- ~,-· ---- '"' ) "' , '/ ----- .- -------------------;-·-------- --------~-------------------------------------------- ·-----~----------------------- -_..,.. __ - --::-p;~::~:~nd :e-n~l~:~(~~~ ~f-t:e p~~~ic :e~r:; ~n: ~t::-:f~:~~ :o=t~I~ t~·~.p~~~l~-~--:t-[-Jn-rw-n File No's: L01TY401 & L01P0016 -Evendell Rezone & Plat U U OC[ 11 '._.~l \ -- Name: ~J qq'-4 ,5±:ctr, ! Y: 1< r n n i:: ~ Address: I 3 s--/el /lo o-f1' A-u.R. S.f: · 8£NT7JI\) (,/(). qtD:5'9 Telephone No.: L/..2.s-.;23S-)J"03 ~ _ ............. -- F96\tprs\ll0. lp\Type-4' .noa '7/18/96-9 ,40.M/dj -----------------------------------------------------c._::_---- -·-----------------; ;--------,----------- -.------.. ---- . ------+------. --------___ ; ___ - ---------------,------__ . __ -~----.-- ---.-----------..----~------. ------.-·---_.,,.-____ ,,. /• ----.---------------------· ---. --. ______________ ..... __ :.__ -·--. ---------+----/,; ,' ---.---- -------·' ... ___ . ___ _ ---.-----:-------------·--· . -'·· --------- ....... , .• ·I . . . . .J ' •.j•,,,,.:/.;,,~, Project Description: The proposal is to rezone 13 acres of property frimi R-4 to R-6 and to divide °the . site into 75 lots for detached single-family homes. Should the rezone not be granted, the applicant has proposed an alternative to subdivide a smaller portion of 11.46 acres under R-6 zoning into 44 Jots for development o( single-family use • ·, Permits requested in this application: Rezone and Formal Plat Relevant environmental documents are available at the address below: Yes :'••s) l.,· i Development regulations to be used, for project mitigation, known at .this time: KCC 21A and KCC.19A " ~/ Consistency with applicable Collnty_ pl~n~ and regulations: Th.is. project will be reviewed for compliance· with all applicable King County ·co'aes·:ipcluding Road S.tandards, Surface Water Management Design•. Manual, and Sensitive Area Regulations. -,;J-' I • · Other permits not included in this application, known at this time: Building Permits. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all of the required permits. A public hearing before the King County Hearing Examiner is required for this application. Notification of the public hearing date will occur approximately 30 days prior to the scheduled hearing. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) will issue a report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two (2) weeks prior to the scheduled public hearing. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written recommendation on the rezone and decision regarding the plat which may be appealed to the Metropolitan-King County Council. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice of recommendation. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact DOES at the address and/or teleph?ne number listed below. Written comments may also be submitted to DD~S. You may review the application and any environmental documents or studies in our Renton office. NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). Department of Development aud Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest · Renton, \Vashington 98055-1219 Mailing Date: October 4. 2001 '. , =========================== ================= ===== ' Please-send me notification of the public hearing aad other official notices concerning this application. · File No's: L01TY401 & LOIP0016 Name: ~ re-vE -Evenclell Rezone & Plat L'f"IVJAA! Address: I '-I!, o £ -I 6 0 +,-, A~. S·E. .·. Telephone No.: {t";z{') J-7,(-:-~¥ f3 C) ~en±-o.v1 rµA:611 9Ros-1 I J ', ·:!'.-··i'. ;\<: J, r9'\lpn\UO. lp\Type·ol .noa 7/18/'6· 9 ,4'AM/dj K.C. O.O,i;.S. . ~ High Country Contractors, Inc. 14505 160th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 D.D Es ~/i'T-...,~ ... ?,,·,·---'"\ V ~;· F ;,,] l::, .j. (:'"_, \ .n •• ·' \ ll(AI ( . I ',<'09.;/' -· -----·--,.,,,, ___ ._. -·~· - ,.._.,.,.r ·r-·.,..,,-,..A•-.~.,,._.z#'·" -· -'-...~ "' __..,,. ... -.. ,..._,,,,,__..,.~ ' ~-.~ -~~~..-----,,. ________ , ; -' ::~: . .''.":~==·~,-~== _;_.. -·- . . . L 4-,.,J c( U '5 e__ .5 e r v, °(. ~ $ D,v,s,oAJ s:~. Cjoo O A f<~da..& ,4ve. R ~ {o ,,, iv A er Flo ~s--t ;)...{ c, GENERAL CONTRACTOR -ae.~l!.$~\.'1\."il 0'2.. 11,1, .1 .. I, II, .. , I, I, .1.1 .... 11 .. 1.1 ... 111.1 •• 1.1 .. 1.1 .... 1.11 ® Deparnnent of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division Notice of Application 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Applicant: Howard Stansbury U.S. Land Development Associates c/o Centurian Development Services 22617 S'h Drive SE Bothell, WA 98021 File #'s: L01TY401 & L01P0016 File Name: Evendell Rezone & Plat ODES Planner: Katen Scharer (Type 4) Planner Telephone No. (206) 296-7114 Planner E-Mail: karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Date Application Filed: July 6, 2001 Date Determined Complete: September 20, 2001 Project Location: The site is located south of SE 136" Street between 156'h Avenue SE and 160'h Avenue SE. Project Description: The proposal is to rezone 13 acres of property from R-4 to R-6 and to divide the site into 75 lots for detached single-family homes. Should the rezone not be granted, the applicant has proposed an alternative to subdivide a smaller portion of 11.46 acres under R-6 zoning into 44 lots for development o( single-family use. Permits requested in this application: Rezone and Formal Plat Relevant environmental documents are available at the address below: Yes Development regulations to be used for project mitigation, known at this time: KCC 21A and KCC 19A Consistency with applicable County plans and regulations: This project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County Codes including Road Standards, Surface Water Management Design Manual, and Sensitive Area Regulations. · Other permits not included in this application, known at this time: Building Permits. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all of the required permits. A public hearing before the King County Hearing Examiner is required for this application. Notification of the public hearing date will occur approximately 30 days prior to the scheduled hearing. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) 'will issue a report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two (2) weeks prior to the scheduled public hearing. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written recommendation on the rezone and decision regarding the plat which may be appealed to the Metropolitan-King County Council. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice of recommendation. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact DOES at the address and/or telephone number listed below. Written comments may also be submitted to DOES. You may review the application and any environmental documents or studies in our Renton office. NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Mailing Date: October 4, 2001 =======-=====--====--==-----=-----==--------------- \ Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning this application. File No's: L01TY401 & L01P0016 -Evendell Rezone & Plat Name: _______________________________ _ Address:--------------------------------,- -------------------Telephone No.: P96\1pu\UO .lp\Type-4 .noa 7/18/96·9 ,40Jt/dj ll "II' ' I I•. I . . ,r J ~~' 11!1 I J Iii• 1 1 ·r •" lj, ,lj, I ,, !j,i ! I!~ iii! I r, lral " 1111 f I t~ f q Pjl ! ! ,, i I' • Ji I 'II . I !( II PjH' . I 111 . ! '. I I I 'I ,. !JI ' H r, 1: ~ ~~I; I· 111 i I P i mi, 1llill tl!ll'l ii I . J i l llillPII: Ii I I i l l 11111 HIii I 1!11 1 11 I.L! I 'Hl1•1 11! 11! I I I l 1111 l Hll1I ; I ·1-1 I m . 1·11 , • ,i , 1 : 1 1.1.1 ! ,,1 , • · i 1 .,.,, I •ti I I .. I ' I I I l•I I I I 1,1 r ! 1111 I , r: · · ·1 1 1 • , ,;11· , ii•1 1 11 , ·h 1 11·u 'ii I 1 11lilli '• ii .•11! I I • ! DJ!if lfl'f l•lll !•,If I I ! . ' l l ll .. ' . I ! ; I I. I l 'I! ~HI • I , • ' I ' ! I! I l!I 1 !l • I I, I l ~ I j I 'I I l if ~ . . I I H ~ ill 'I I !• l I r I! ii i I I ~ l' f Ir 11· ii l! I ! I I· ' I I i i ' i ! i "' ,,, "'Cl '$ ::0 tr:l ~ ~ "' i:: -5;: § ... I ::0 ;;:j -< ~ "' :a,: "'Cl I ~ I:'"" ~ ..., ,,, "~ ) ' + @ King County JQ)~JE~ Department of Development and Environ.m.ental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Sou th west Renton, WA 98055-1219 ~· , ••••-. -a·---1 h;tr'!JHIVE~iA3LE ~-:.:~ , . I .> '"" AS .HH)?.ESSEU (.~' ! i' •, ' 7r> r IH t ".',I"\ ~...,,-i '.J~in8'L E I u r Ofl n ~:-iu ~:[ L5TURN TO S~NO ER 1 2006000140/L01P0016 DA VIES ROBERT A & LORI 14708 30TH NE SEATTLE WA 98126 ...------------.. ~ :5Sg rZffl'-> ~----,,._,,.,I ' 4" T~,. ~d;""'. "'f3h xi? """ttl1 ·" =Jf'g ~ ' ~ "'"' ~l ~4'0 • ) ~;di~ : ~ 3 4 : (1 ... g (1 U.9. POSTAGE J ~ ,, \\l,(J: <,. ~ GJ Vt''!; ~~~A~ 'I.~ II ,I, ,l,,l,ll,11il ,1,, l,l,,, ,IJ,, l,l, .. 111,1, ,I ,i, ,I ,I,, 11i,II n}_.,-. Rogers, Carol From: Scharer, Karen Sent: To: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 7:44 AM 'Kurt Wilson' Cc: Rogers, Carol Subject: RE: L01 P0016 (Evendell Plat) Kurt - Your name will be added to our interested party list & I sent you a copy of the notice today. From: Sent: To: Subject: Kurt Wilson[SMTP:kwilson@harbourhomes.com] Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:32 AM Karen.scharer@metrokc.gov L01P0016 (Evendell Plat) Please put me un the notification list for this project. Also, please send me a copy of the Public Motice of Application with attached plat map. Harbour Homes attn: Kurt Wilson 1010 S. 336th St., Suite 305 Federal way, WA 98003 Thanks Kurt Wilson Land Acquisitions South Puget Sound kwilson@harbourhomes.com 253-838-8305 office 235-838-3990 fax Page 1 J Rogers, Carol From: Sent: To: Marsha Rollinger[SMTP:marsro01@noa.nintendo.com) Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:32 PM Carol.Rogers@METROKC.GOV Subject: Re: Evendell Subdivision and Rezone Thank you for your response! Please put my new home address on the notices (I begin moving in there tomorrow): 15646 SE 138th Place Renton, WA 98059 425.277 .0245 Thanks again for your help. -Marsha Marsha Rollinger Graphic Designer Nintendo of America 4820 150th Avenue N.E. Redmond, WA 98052 U.S.A. 425.861 .2698 marsro01@noa.nintendo.com »> "Rogers, Carol" <Carol.Rogers@METROKC.GOV> -1/15/02 2:42 PM »> Marsha, Robert Ware of our department received an email from you requesting some information. The only notice that has been sent to date is the notice of application. At this point we can add your name to our party of record list and thus you will receive the SEPA notice (environmental decision) and then the notice of hearing from both our department and the hearing examiner's office. Do you want me to use your Redmond address, 4820 150th Ave NE ?? Let me know and I will add your name right away. Carol Rogers Current Planning Section Page 1 Request to be made a Party of Record in the Evendell Application·s (L01P0016 and L01TY401) Mail To: / Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA, 98055-1219 Please add me to the list of Parties of Record for the a Na me (f)rint) 11 Street Address Citv, State, Zi Phone Siqnature J i.(! U1 () (,'I (lJ + ZOOZ OCT c 3 P,'1 I: 4 S K.C.D.D.L.s. n ··. 3 c:-,. V , . , .. , I I\J f'j . :0 .. ' '"" < N :_~ ' . , ' --·· Request to be made a Party of Record in the EvendeU Applications (L01 P0016 and L01TY 401) Mail To: Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA, 98055-1219 Please add me to the list of Parties of Record for the afl_plications L01 P0016 and L01 TY 401. Name (print) / S Ii i r le u ·· /)Q ;-str~et Address I /I/ I/ l-, - :City, State, Zi Phone Siqnature ~-. . .. ['J z:r· :1111::0 !ii I'\ r.: .. ,, :_. • " t:. £1• :;:; 2002 OCT 2 3 PM I: 5 0 ,:II + ..,. 1·,) ... ·, K.C.D.D.E.S . ~D \) S) \) ~ V\ (/~ :;--;~ . . ~o ;: Q -' ---- --- -----· -- '~--- ---\ -" ---~ --~ ----- ' ,~ 1-· ,-· ----l Request to be made, p,rty of Reco«l io the e,endell Applications {L01R0016 and L01TY401) - Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services Mail To·. 900 Oakesdale Ave, SW Renton WA, 98055-1219 \ications L01 P0016 and L01 TY 401. ...... -r -- I ---~ ' --· Si nature -=------------------=:C-----------,..-,----- ----~--- j __ ._ --···--_.;... ___ ----____ , , _ _:_ 1-, --- ,_::_ __ . ~-----~ ----· r- 1· ----------_____ :_: t=--~ ----===-=-=--- ,----- -.-·-- ' _____ _:, ---·-----.---_;.,-.,..._ -----~----.' ' 7-.----,--- _, -f-__ ._ ·.---,-----,;.. -----, . ' . . ·. ~ . 2002 OCT 23 PM I: 45 l<.C.D.D.E.S. ~ . ·-----·-------- -------------· - ---..;------- ___ .,.. __ ----------- ------ ----·- ,. --------,t- ---·. : Request to be made a Party of Record in the Evendell Applications (L01 P0016 and L01 TY 401) ••• • •. • • • • • • • • C •. • • • • •. • • • • • • • • • • • • •. •. • • • • • • • • • •. • • • • • • • • • • •. • ~c~ --· •• • ·-! -- ;:;-~----------·-----····---- Mail To: Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA, 98055-1219 \ications L01P0016 and L01TY401. · Please add me to the Name (print) Street Address Cit , State, Zi Phone Si nature ---------- ---! -. ----------- ---..-----..!... ___ ---------------------______ 1 -------- ----------------____ .: __ -,----------------- -------·-. ------ ~--,-~. . -:-· ---" -----------...,__ ----,-- ------------...-----_..,._ __ . ----.. ---~, ----- ---------~ --;.--· ---------__________ _:. __ _ ___,-of·---_:_ ___ _ ' ----- ... -,. :_ Thorbeck 15650 SE 138th Place Renton, WA 98059 I.D -0 (") w > :z: (L -t~J lD () '" ~ w LC C'!:'. 0 "' = = .,..., en w a a (.) ;:.c j;?~'{i_{'~ (/) ~ . ; ,,·. \ . \. ·1 2:,' . < •,...---cc:,,,. :::=::::.-::_ ·~: ___ .,.,,_ _____ . . ~ -s ... -------. -~ .'"" ~.. I."'::•____... • ::._.:__ ----··-----· Karen Scharer --Planner Dept. of Development & Environmental Svs. .. 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 '· ',I e. C, ,; ,; -\. 2 \. ',I C, l. 11, l,, I,, I, II,,,, l, I,, I, l,,,, 11,, I, I,,, 111, I, ,I, I,, I, I,,,, I, II -----------·--- -------------------------- -------+----·-------------------------------------------------------------- --------------· ----------·---- -----~-----------------I --------£-----------·--------·-------------- --------4-_-----------------;. -------. . ~ .. .......... ·--:----+--..:__ __ _ ------------------. ' ... -. -:::::::=--=··--=~· ------------------------------- Request to be made a Party of Record in the Evendell Applications (L01 P0016 and L01TY401) Please add me to the list of Parties of Record for the a lications L01 P0016 and L01 TY 401 . Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA, 98055-1219 Mail To·. • Street Address ,Ci , State, Zi Phone Si nature ----.. ------·--.------------- -------------------------------------. ----------------------- --.·----~---------· ----------------------------------------------~----------- ~----------------·----------------·-·-------------------------------..-,.-- __ : _______ , _____ _ ---------____ ; __ ~----. -·------------------------------------·-- ------------------_ _.. __________ _ ---------------------· ------------------------------ -:-e-~,-------,---------------·----------·------ --:--------+---·----_, ____ ---------------------.-. ·---'----. ------:,..:.~· -----·---------·- ------------------·---/-' . . ________ ...,_ ---~----,,. "'· ---_--~----. _:---·-.-·_-~_: _____ _ -----.----,, --.--------.·------·~ ---------------------- i i I I ' I I 1 \ ' ' ! -1 I ' l ·1 1 ·: ' ' I i , - • -·' - . . . : ~··· ~ -------------------------- ·------·---- ' ,. \ /"" " , -----------------------------------------------I , ----+--.-------:-· ----------------. -------------------- --~----,.------------. -----------------·--------. ---------------~ -----------.,.. --· -----_,__ __ --------------------·-------------------------__ .. _____________ ------ -------------------------· -•-+---------------------~ - --------------------------------·----------~ --~-----·-. ----. -· ---- Request to be made a Party of Record in the Evendell Applications (L01 P0016 and L01 TY 401) Mail To: Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA, 98055-1219 Please add me to the list of Parties of Record for the a Street Address Cit , State, Zi Phone Si nature ----------------------- 9 --------------- --. --. -.----------------: -----.. ---- ---------+----. ---------------------------------------------· --------------:-----------------------------.. --------·-------------·----- . . ---...-~--------------------------------------------:-----------------------------------.. -:----·---------- -----------·---------------------,'... ----------__ t ___ ------ ·------------------------------·-------·------------------------------------------,--------------------'----------·--·-----~--------------·-----~ --------- ------------------·-----·-·-------------------------------------------------------------------- ---.#--------------------------·-.---.,.__ -----.--------------------·- . -----,r---------. --.... _______________ --. - ' --- ---·-.----~---t---. ----. ------------------------------.-.. -- ---.----+-----------------------------... ---------------____ _...;:.. ----_ __, ,,/. -:'-------·--•-.---__ ..,:.. - ___ ._ ___ --.- --.. -------------· _, ___ . _____ --------------.-----.----------- -• \if 11, P.Ec,~1vtu c:i ;,J' .... ; (II 2002 o•~T 2{14~3 (II + .... 1·,:, ,~o 'J .... u:, C5 . -~ :,- r ~ (-,.~-~~~ - ., , - I '. ., ~ ) - * ' . ! \ ' ' t l ~ ,./ ' ,, - ----~ ~ I • ; ~ ~ ~ \ ', ' \ -~ . ' - \ ... - I \ I \ I ' . j ~ .. -I ~ -'-.. t ~e ~ :--" === ~ ~ t· ,. ·--+-------·-------------------------·---------- --~------·------· -----·-------- .. -----·---------~----------·------------------------. ___ ---------------·-------··---------------· ---. ---~---------------------·---·- ----------.. -·---------------------c-- --~:--------------·--· ---- . ----------------------------------------------..----------4----------·--------. ---------------------- --;···· • 7_.,_._ .. '---------------~-·-·-~-----.... ~-·.c-·-~ ·,;=;-,:;;r:-,-;-,-, ~-·---. ~;~.-----...... ,......-------·-· --·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·---·--·---..... ~ l--- Request to be made a Party of Record in the Evendell Applications (L01P0016 and L01TY401) Mail To: Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA, 98055-1219 lications L01 P0016 and L01TY401. Cit , State, Zi Phone Si nature . -------------.:... ·--:------r----------------·----------------- ----------..---------------------------------------------· '--------' -------------------. --------------------------------------------~ ------..----------------~----------------------------------·--------. -----·-----------------~ ----------.---------. ---------------- '--·----.._ ___ ..:_ _______ -------------------------------------------------'----------··---.-- 1---. ____ .;.._ __ ------------------------------- ! -----------------------------------r-·---·---___ . ___ _:_ ----_______ . __ -.-------·--------------------------------~ 1-----·------. _______ · __ -------·-------. -.-------···-··---. ---.... -------------··-----------· 1··-----------------------------·-----------------~-.... ---------------------~ --;----- i---.. ---·---··-··-:-·-·~----:-------. -··- j___ --------·---·--... -. ---.-----.. --------------. ----------------------· f--7 --·· -·--·-----------·----------• ----------.. -.. ------'r ------ -------' ---·----------------__ _: __ ---·-----·----------------~ .,---------~ ---';'-.· ---.----'·- . --------'·1"----------.--' -. ------,·-------·-,~ .. -----_. .• ,• ,i.. ' -------~------~------- ---------+--------------------·- ' ------ ---·-----...+-------------- ---... -----.. ----4--------------------------------,_ ... -_--------------------------.r-.. --_· --~-..... ----~--·---·--------------·----------- Request to be made a Party of Record in the Evendell Applications (L01 P0016 and L01 TY 401) Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA, 9B055-1219 Mail To: ---· Name (print) Street Address --.-, Cit , State, Zi Phone Si nature ·---------_, ------------~----,_.-__ -_-------- --_, ___ -· ·-· _...._ ____ ----------------- ----+----------· -------- -~----------.------" I ' -:.------.-----.:_ ____ ----------------------------------------------~----------- ------------------ ~. . ----------,----- .--------·------------------. - ----·------------ -------· --------...:.. --. ---------,--_.,_ ----;--· -------+ ~-;-----------------__!_ --~ --___ .., __ _ --.,--~------;----·--- -------·--' .... _ --_. __ ---·-.-------____ ,. ______ ,.._ --· --·--, ---··----- ,· .. '· 1 • •• , . I. .-- ' ., ' f I I I ! ' I L • I I i Request to be made a Party of Record in the Evendell Applications (L01 P0016 and L01 TY401) Mail To: Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA, 98055-1219 lications L01 P0016 and L01 TY 401. Name (print) · Street Address Cit , State, Zi Phone Si nature /· ( - ;.._. '< .. , I I -~ I . I ' •• ~ I -l I ( ' ,~? -:----~-.. ' ' ' • t t · ~ ~- ' I . t I •• I· -- C 1·-----/ j r··-- 1 I I t. 1--C I - t. --. -- i-·-·· . . - ----: . • .. .--· .- ., .. '· . 1 '1 I --t - I ,•·••' • I 1 4 ( 4 ··---·-' G --~ • .. -. 4 4 ·--~• Request to be made a Party of Record in the Evendell Applications (L01 P0016 and L01 TY 401) Mail To: Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA, 98055-1219 lications L01 P0016 and L01 TY 401. Name (print) Street Address Cit , State, Zi Phone Si nature ...... ' ' ' ' / .. . • 'I ~ _4 '. -. 4 ~---4 .-f ) ' ). . ;-· _ _I ' T ) ; ". ; ; ; • • ·---' -l -. -.. ~ • t ~ ~- ) iQ • ---;·..--~~ --i -· ··-- -, '. ·-------·-·-----·---·--··-·-·-------------·----·----·-··.~----~~--·-----------·---·---_,.._ ·-~-- . I I -~ j r I Request to be made a Party of Record in the Evendell Applications (L01 P0016 and L01TY 401) Mail To: Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA, 98055-1219 Please add me to the list of Parties of Record for the applications L01 P0016 and L01 TY 401. Name (print) Kr I Si nature . f--. -;· "'. - ,.. ' ·.•·.•.· • ~ I ., ---.+ •... : ) \ / // / -~----· ·----+---- ---... ___ _,;_ ---4-- ~ -- --:-r---. -..;--- ' ----· ----- \ ---- ' / • --' -____ .t ---- ------·- . -•------,-· ·------. -.--- .; , -----· ~~ I I , ', l • ; I I , I i ; I I I , ; I ; : l \ 1, \ \ ' . . \ ' \ l ; I ' .;/ --= ::;:;; -= -= --= -= ::;:;; I .. '· -' I I ---1 ---., I ·1 -_-_-_ -;;s::: ___ ----------------•c-vc~~--•v •-·-·-----------• --·------______________ ..:_ Request to be made a Party of Record in the Evendell Applications (L01 P0016 and L01TY 401) Mail To: Name (print) Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA, 98055-1219 i, Street Address ,. ,-C.::...:..:.itL!'--'S:.ct:.::;ac.:.:te:...!,~Z=-iL-------1-1+-'----''-"---~~-,-=c<..L...--L.!.l.-""-'=---'-------------;d-'<+V! Phone Si nature ' I I 1 ' I ----_, -I · :-I I I 1 I I r f. i I I :· ;, . . . . ' "'r-', -~~- ! ; ~ ) )- ) I ), I I , 1- I -- I- /" i-·, (' I 1 • \ / / / / • ,, ' • - __ :;,<... __________________________ --------. ______ . -------- Request to be made a Party of Record in the Evendell Applications (L01 P0016 and L01TY 401) Mail To: ' Name (er_int) Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA, 98055-1219 Street Address Citv,_§tc1_tei Zi Phone Sianature ' ! · .. ·~·:'·· ....•. n./': ~~ •. if/Ji ~~.~,,.,~Sii~fib""'' ,_.....:...:.,,~-'\ .. ·, ..• -'·····- ~ ' I . _:._.;.:,,,,..._-;: __ -_____ -.:: __________ .:.·. -----·-· ------.-~----~--=----~:.-: ------;.· . Request to be made a Party of Record in the Evendell Applications (L01P0016 and L01TY401) Mail To: Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services · l · 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA, 98055-1219 I ~ Please add me to the list of Parties of Record for the a lications L01 P0016 and L01 TY 401. Name (print) R oN l)f't Street Address Cit , State, Zi Phone Si nature IJ) ii' s "' ' ,, ~ .. t'1 - --- --- ------ -- -- . ---. ~ r:-c··.-·1·1 ·o lh:. ., :. \, t: ,I 2002Cf'T28 PM 5:08 l<.C.l).D.E.S. --0, v -lj Q; tJ C) rt l i Fv J > S:L.> ~ ~ C.>q ~. f v1 V I ' '-[ r -'*' ' 7t f' V) ~ 1 r ~ -3 Sc~ <; ' f\> r:~ '. ,\ -0 -r .:., a ~ \.,-, .::.i <I.·, ' •,.....J_g_~' ~ I ' ~ -·--------··--·--·----·----·----- Request to be made a Party of Record in the Evendell Applications (L01 P0016 and L01TY401) Mail To: Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Developr:nent and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA, 98055-1219 , Please add me to the list of Parties of Record for the a lications L01 P0016 and L01 TY 401. Name (print) Street Address Cit , State, Zi ,t~_.,T.:.,.., Phone Si nature ---------·--~ ... _, -7 ............... ~J". ·--·-·--------------____ .., __ ------• Request to be made a Party of Record in the Evendell Applications (L01 P0016 and L01TY401) Mail To: Name (print) Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA, 98055-1219 lications L01 P0016 and L01TY401. Street Address Cit , State, Zi Phone Si nature !¥ Tim Lex 13116 158th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059-8531 ..:r C, C :,,;~; tn V> ,..,:L.~ :,c CL Li.I -· 0 L~! 00 G N 0 w >-u LO c:: Cl :to: c--. = = "' <,,, ' ···-.'\' ... ------·-.'-->.,._ F-": i ,.-\ ,.,. I , ::; CC:J• , ... : ~~ -- Karrn Sc hc;rrc.r -f /ann(?r (pp!. (){ {}tvdt>p~ ~ ,Envi rPn~~ 5-«f//'ce,g ';/JD t)?ik~s4~ /f LK, 5iJ ~, ul-1t 1n55-1211 ..... ,., __ ------.- ~~O~'S°'t' \.2'\ ~ 11, I,, I,, I, II,,,, I, 1 .. I, 1 .... 11., 1,1,, ,111,1, ,I, I .. 1,1,,, ,1,ll ., LOVE 37 USA I I / .-----~------------. ·--. --. -------. ---·-.. ---------···. -· ------------·-----------------------------------·-·-·· -- Request to be made a Party of Record in the Evendell Applications (L01 P0016 and L01TY401) Mail To: Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA, 98055-1219 : Please add me to the list of Parties of Record for the a .. Street Address Cit , State, Zi Phone Si nature -•. ---·-·-· --~-------·-· ......... --·-·-·-·-------·-·-·--·-·--·-·--·----·----·--·-·-·-·-----·-------------. Request to be made a Party of Record in the Evendell Applications (L01 P0016 and L01TY401) Mail To: Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW • Renton WA, 98055-1219 Please add me to the list of Parties of Record for the a lications L01 P0016 and L01 TY 401. Name (print) Street Address Cit , State, Zi Phone Si nature ------------- --- ---- RECFIVED 2002 Wlli / Ii PM I: 48 l<.C.D.D.E.S. P?Tsr: } -... , -. -~ ~ .:.,,, ~ ,~'-~ * ~,1 -. ---.,-.;.. -----------·------------------------·-------... ·........_....:. . -. -.. ---=-·-----------··-·-·-·-·-·-·-·--------·-·--·---·-·--.... _ -----.. = Request to be made a Party of Record in the Evendell Applications (L01P0016 and L01TY401) Mail To: ·,1 Name (print) Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA, 98055-1219 ' Street Address ' Cit , State, Zi Phone Si nature ------------·------------ I I I I I : ' ' . f . • • ·• l ·s·3·a·a·::i·)I L £ :£ Wd 62 l:JO ZOOZ a:-:Al303~ .... _ ·-.. :::::: ~~ ~: •rf ,:•.J .,.. '·t- i(., If.• () •IJ 1.n . -------------·--------· -·---_____ -----~~-------· Request to be made a Party of Record in the Evendell Applications (L01 P0016 and L01TY 401) Mail To: ! Name (print) Karen Scharer -Planner Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA, 98055-1219 Street Address Cit , State, Zi Phone Si nature ,i1 f.11 0 (,'I (,'I + ,-,. 1·~1 ,.,. u:i ---- - - - - - ---- - - .~ Rt."'._.' .. 1 1~~1 QC~ 3Q ?I'\ '3: '3Q \i-.c.D,D.t.·S. ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ \S t ~~ ~ ~ hf 'J r '-~ 1.__ -~ ·[4 f. ' 1 $ r. ""<.'.> N J "' -o "' r r1 ~ -., -'" ~ . ,._. ra:., --· / . -· -----. --.... -. --· ~ --..• ----..• ------,,, --· --------------..... . Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices conc·erning;this:applicatio@n. 1u;Ls.'.:'.7tsuW@ File No's: L01TY401 & L01P0016 -Evendell Rezone & Plat lfll D or · .. 1 2001 Name: LE.ONA-Ra 'iJ: T,?M:t{s:n,AJ . I Address:/60/6 S.f_. /3.5"71,I. K.C. D.D.E.S ...J,,fi.....,E.,,.AJ""'--"7?2"""""4'4-4_..l{.)~&c~~9'~f': .... Q~~~S+?---Telephone No.: I '96\•pn\120. lp\Type-4 ,noa 7/18/96-9,46»!/dj • (~ ~ ~V) ~ \ \ ~ ::,; \ \ ' ' ~ {U)i, \, I -~ t i I I " 0 ' I I ~-~ ! . I I J . ' \ t \ ~ l ! • • • "-! ~ \i\ -------------------·-·------·-·-·-·--~-..·-·-·-·-·-·-· ----·-·-·-·-·-=.-....;..-_~·- Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices cbfl?elliint'Rlg-1 th!~ ~p\\iidatib~~ 1;:;<,~ ~" ,,_ ~[IJ) File No's: L01TY401 & L01P0016 -Evendell Rezone & Plat U U . OCT 1 j ~2JJ -- Name: Alv;"" Wolb~ ----'-~:..:_c____c:..::..::..=U==-,-4+7--<1___---------K-.C~.-D~.=o~.E-.S~.- Address:_--1.\"'(l/..,,,tl....::2-:c..L-I _'S::..,t:...=-_...:..\3::....;,:v_v __ '°'-'--'-------------- ---'-~-=-=Jl/'.\N.iu..c:. _ _:vJ.c...A:....:.· ___ q...::...ic._O_S]__,__ __ Telephone No.: n6\epn\l~O. lp\Typ'!·4 .noa 7/l8/96-9 •46AM/dj ::::: == -· =·. -=.· ::::· ... -· -· -· -· -· -· ~ ----· -----------=-~-=-=·=""=·=·=·· -=-=-=-= = = =· -= = = = = = = = --. --= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices cobce)r\ilig~hfs~a2piJahlJ@ File No's: LOITY401 & LOIP0016 -Evendell Rezone & Plat lfu CS f j j 2001 Name: f)c wo.,rd._ ct hla..-n ~ t\, ·1.J:ro .J..L I\ c; K.C. U.U.t:.::i. Address: I ;,L// L/ -/ 5g' ~ t'.x._ L..- :'Js?~un I W--A, 9 &"OSi TelephoneNo.(L/~~) c'1S$ -~9 /}-/ 1"91,P:eprs\UO. lp\Type-4 ,noa "1/18/96· 9 r46AM/dj '' ==· . _;· -· -=· 1 '~ (] lj-.... =,' "'lGJ ....... '~· ~ "' >-.: / 5 6 VJ ..J ~ 0 ~ -·· ,.. n.. Cl -~ 1 -:: <' ~ :... C\J m I " p <[ -· .15 L a 1 ~i ~ -· -· == -· =i ~ ~3- :::: 1 \J :s G f ~ .. 1'1 .. 111 ()& .j-.. , ~·J p -l ~ ~ ~ ® Department of Development and Envirorunemal Services Land Use Services Division Notice of Application 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055·1219 Applicant: Howard Stansbury U.S. Land Development Associates c/o Centurian Development Services 22617 S'h Drive SE File #'s: L01TY401 & L01P0016 File Name: Evendell Rezone & Plat DDES Planner: Karen Scharer (Type 4) Bothell, WA 98021 Planner Telephone No. (206) 296-7114 Planner E-Mail: karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Date Application Filed: July 6, 2001 Date Determined Complete: September 20, 2001 Project Location: The site is located south of SE 136'h Street between 156'h Avenue SE and 160'h Avenue SE. Project Description: The proposal is to rezone 13 acres of property from R-4 to R-6 and to divide the site into 75 lots for detached single-family homes. Should the rezone not be granted, the applicant has proposed an alternative to subdivide a smaller portion of 11.46 acres under R-6 zoning into 44 lots for development o~ single-family use. Permits requested in this application: Rezone and Formal Plat Relevant environmental documents are available at the address below: Yes Development regulations to be used for project mitigation, known at this time: KCC 21A and KCC 19A Consistency with applicable County plans and regulations: This project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County Codes including Road Standards, Surface Water Management Design Manual, and Sensitive Area Regulations. Other permits not included in this application, known at this time: Building Permits. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all of the required permits. A public hearing before the King County Hearing Examiner is required for this application. Notification of the public hearing date will occur approximately 30 days prior to the scheduled hearing. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) will issue a report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two (2) weeks prior to the scheduled public hearing. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written recommendation on the rezone and decision regarding the plat which may be appealed to the Metropolitan-King County Council. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice of recommendation. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact ODES at the address and/or telephone number listed below. Written comments may also be submitted to ODES. You may review the application and any environmental documents or srudies in our Renton office. NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Mailing Date: October 4. 2001 ===========================================-======- ' Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning this application. File No's: L01TY401 & L01P0016 -Evendell Rezone & Plat Name: ----------------------------,,------- Address: _________________________________ -,- -------------------Telephone No.: --------- V,6\apn\llO. lp\Type-4 .1_1,oa 7/ll/96·9 ,46»1/dj l11·111 · . . , .. ~~' 'I' I ' V , ,/i 1!J. I 11 !l,j I lj~ 11111 E i II I H WI " '' I , , ·j I 111 · ! I II llll!I · 11 If • •'! I 't ,. ,1•!11 F II !!! • 111!• I 11! I lj J r1 ; 1: ~-r· f· 1,.· 1-'·.'·'1 '1 i. ,',' 1.· 1· m'I !1lilj I ij, r"i lj I I lfl1:l1,lf1•1 . Ji 111111111i: II! I i I. i 1111 l i!!li I I!! I' I J l,lt I '11111 IJ! l'l j I I l 1111 i !ht! l 'I 11· ! I ~~i I '!I ( • ! j 1 1 l 1 11 I !ill,! i l 1' .,.,: i I ,J I I i I ! I f11 i • I 11 I lilll I !ilj l i Ii I -I!! I rl h l I 'ii I. Uh 11· l 11 , ! I• I • ! . l lll. !llijllll I Ill 'I I 11 l'i ! Ii I I I I I:':-. !§11111'! Iii I lj! II I I I ' I j!l!I J!j(11 1: !•If I I I I 'I I I i!/H l!!lj ' ' •• I I I ~ I . j l 'I! ~H~ • I !ii 1 , r I! f I ! i l t I• I ! ~ l f I 'I I ir ~ . . If r r t ii i •11!ii I ! i! ii i I I ~ If Ir ll·1; i ii I I l ! I I I I I ' l ! i i I V) "' L} i ::0 ~ l PJ ~ ~ l V) -~ ~ ' ... ' I ' ::0 \ ;:j -< ~ l "' :z: L} I £: t'"' \ :0 "' ...., "' i ~c: i ' Ii; ©) King County ]Q)E))JE2S Department ofDevelopment and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 ~ ,~ ' . \; I • I ' .. ...-\,J' . D'I ,.,. en \ I I ..J· .JU '; r, ;i· I I? 1,.•..:'- . . . :::,. '·~',I,' - Lw af . IO LI CJ,.0l. fG//1 V ·-i C ::. ~-.·~·:.:·: :~ ,-_----·-- : I u ,¥ r~ i 'c_--cicf· -. f i r I • ._:-,..,,,. _,• ' f C [] '~ E.::sr:-;:· --f ~ !u N KN\~ w r5·' -1 . -· -. i· .. ---- ' ,002 JO~Z o1 co '°' Wd ~,i, ~ ~ "' ·"' t. -~~~':..!()! 74180000!0/LOIPOOJ6 SPENCER DAVID LEE !3806156THAVESE RENTON WA 98059 12 --~ (I. (I·- '·••-•.-V~ 1,Ho,:l'S., J(r LEE-806 gao5q301s iN 2i i0/i6/0i RETURN TO SENDER NO .~ FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDER _ .. -~ .~ I I -==================~-------===---===========~=~=--- Please send me notification of the public hear'ing and other official notices concerning this application . . (". ~. r, · ,-·. Name: ·. \rn1 ----.!&-......C'--''-'-'-.... ..__-0 ................ ~-=~~=-u--------B""'"U,...,.,, ,.,.1 _,1..,.ia"'·-' . .,.., +, ...,,.,,.,,,.,,;,..,..,,=-- Adaress: ___ '*....!::~=-lW=~.c=::_-"~------------,~or . ..,.-·,, -:.-;-, -:-. ,f-.. ".', 7. ,""..-,:---- Telephone No.: '£2,,<-;x)l., ~"13 F96\•pu\llO. lp\T}'pa·4o .noa '1/U/96·9 ,46AH/dj . •' ·1 •. i:::. . " ~ . ·.i c· ' t • < ! l l. \ \ '-. ' ' \ . \ I ' ·, '1 Ill 0--$) V) ~ () °" ~ ":t 13- i '*~ 1 ._ -.J) , ~ -'-~ 8 ~ _J t, c1 'CJ -- , .. .... , + . ) .'~i: Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Mailing Date: October 4, 2001 ========================--=====-------------------- ' Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning this application . $;,;:;:-:i·;c-. ! : i~\l~::{lt~i:\{;{:~•i;);, C ·, II 1· .•• ' I ! jif(t'iit~;;,,:< _; -_ ! I -l ~t 6~ b ;;, '-> C ''1" ' .- ~.,. '5°" C) - ~.. ..... -:i a ' a.. ' C) ·';, f:: n,.. 'Y1 ··Y,( 10 LW .:.i ; 0- 0 -w d'.:> a ~ t ~ -+ .._ cs 8 • t"" • ~ " ., . 0 -o· 7··· r/·e,. ·c .'/J ,,, )f (',;, (7~ c, ,.,11) /r,'(J Y! ; . I • ,, Ss ~?r 0) v) - ·-I > ~~ Q 52 18 \....I >-cs s:·<t <,... (U < ~-s (j) c5 . ~~ ~ ~8-f Co V -5€0:: --.:: .:: .:: -E ----- :: --- ·11·1 ·:-1 t-1 .,; + ,\') ,\') [1 :ell "(T"i ---- Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Mailing Date: October 4, 2001 ' Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning this application. File No's: L01TY40I & L01P0016 -Evendell Rezone & Plat Jirune: Joann Lee 1 Address: l BZD1 I loD-11l Aot 'Xi Rw±otl \Al A g $['6q Telephone No.: \ i \ ' 'J ! I , 1 I i -' ' i - / l ! ' --~ l : u I i i , -: .3 --:: ::::> -c5 ,_ J -= ~ I == 'Jl' I ·°"\ ~ -'~.-.. .,, :-. C·. 1 ~ ~ ..., -:::,. ~ ·--.J D. .__. "'=' ~ ~ .,, .,, <I) "· ' -8 .,,....,<:-r ~ -= _..,..) .,, @=·~ 1 -= -~ ~ C) = "'= ":;) ::> 4 IS'" -~ .... -= ~ ··--c5 ~ - ~ 3 ~ 1:r, .:,,.l .... =5 ~ -E ,;,.1 ,,., ~ + ~ U• .s: 0 11:0 a Cr ~ •tl __J a-1:n ---~-.. -. =========-============-==-===----=---====---==-===- Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning this application. File No's: L01TY401 & L01P0016 -Evendell Rezone & Plat Name: Df/v IQ 1t,Jf}1.,Tti«.... ·~'°'.(·a '(I""). \,I Address: / :;-(, 3 S-.5 l-I 3 S-f' L. 7 C: :7 11.j I J ·., ·,· ' ---'-~:::i.~e:;NTOc.:....:...::._:r.J~, .....,u>.Ll.:...;'4-c_.;;;.9:.;,8'.:;:D:..::-Sc..-.t...L-------Telephone No.: .. , . .1,f e,',,: 7, 71-, 9 807 I ~ H / l l .... .-_. l ·e r: ·Jn·: . .. . , ' ·i ·,' . . . -----.. 1 . '-,: · ... ;, '. I'.-· CC~ [\ ' ~ --' '' I• i . . . . . . ...,). ·'-''· . L ..! •.• [\ Please send me nouficauon of the pubhc heanng and other official notices concernmg this appl1cauon. u u i I ,,;,~ .. File No's: L01TY401 & L01P0016 -Evendell Rezone & Plat · · · ,,I Name: \cJ)JC\ 1-\V-t.lJ G"<; Address: l~'-lb ~ l~i+l 'Pl· KC: DOE.,; ---~-·/JT:_o_iJ~·, _tJ._A __ cl_lS_D_$'_9 ____ Telephone No.: <./ZS'-103-s·1"jo F96\apra\ll0 . lp\Type-,t,. ~oa 'I /18/96 · 9 , 4.6>.M/dj [X}o~@m-r kurth 6/2244 Microsoft Corporation One Microsoft Way Redmond, WA 98052-6399 Forwa~\ng Service R~uest~ """' 0 .,:(';"'C"T~·,, .. -iv"\ i F; ··c::\ 16 O"T ~·J ' . '-.. 2C0\ / Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Ave. Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 i:,;,i;-,,,, __ ,, •• --·-- ~· ···---·· n "3,e,,f".J~°!'b/ \.'2:.1.2 I I; I,, I,, I, I I, 11, I, I,, I, I,,,,/ I,, I, I,,, II,, I, I II,,, II,,, I,, ,II ========-==-=-=-==-=--=-=-==-=-======-==-=-==-=-==- Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official~y~s ~tff/lWJ ~s/_Q)-aDpplication. File No's: L01TY401 & L0IP0016 -Evendell Rezone & Plat LfU f'"" ? I I n pr: :1 Ovl 1 6 2301 Name: ___15,_0 n .vi. til. 1....-0 Cl 1v Address: /{r;o/5°" SI:' /3? sj · K.C. D.D.ES. 'J?eodvn W II 9®5CJ -&'tJ..7 TelephoneNo.: 4)5 ;}S,S: .51/Jt/ n,~.spn\l~O. lp\Type-4 .noa 7/18/96·9 ,46Al-t/dj \ . Rllltl · .· : I ·-- ' -- ; -------·---·-·-·-·-------·-· •.. ------·-·-· . --------------·-- Please send me notification of the public hearing a~d other official notiJ;2ciffcbffiili°g llii1'.awlication .. I '·-~ ~ w u -.J / IJ J m. . . File No's: LOITY401 & LOIP0016 -Evendell Rezone & Plat Name: __ r{ltk~=t_t~_-~ki~'~n-P _________________ _ ~J!) (k ~{clo:,J ' ,·· . /OS's ~0rnc1-3 y,hty: l?etdmvtM Address: -------------------Telephone No.: --------- F'6\11pra\ll0, lp\Type·4 .i_,oa 7/U/96'.·Sl 146'.AM/dj .m@) <Cl!! 2e?pm~:1o2~ ~ and Strategic Planning 1055 South Grady Way -Renton Washington 98055 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED Dept. of Development & Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 ';!l!,<:)":,":,'\-\'2\';! <:>'2 II, I!, I,, 1,11,, ! , I ,I,, I ,I,,, ,11,, l, I,,, I I I, I,, l,\11! ! \, ! ! 'i 'Ii A -------. ----·-------------------. ----·----------·-·-------~------ ' Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning this application. File No's: L01TY401 & L01P0016 -Evendell Rezone & Plat Address: \3527-(54:, e. '0.G· 2GD1orr1 p,i,,.r~ -· R eM.: 0 ) \Al :A-er~() 0 Telephone No.:(g-.<?:~uo~-~ ~~ 10 i 0 F96\i:pn\ll0. lp\Type•4 ,r.ioa 7/lB/96·9 ,OAM/dj / ;o-l~--o/ , ~ \ \ \ t( . • .... ,\I ' . '· l j l ; . ------------- Mailing Date: October 4, 2001 =================================================== Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning,tliis <l!)plic'aticif ~ File No's: L01TY401 & L01P0016 -Evende\l Rezone & Plat \ O~ \.::J \::2 t::: O~ ,.~(): ~ Lru OCT 'I LJ I Name: l:>AV£ PETRIE B rL. ,,-c K.C. o.o.E.S. Address: /{ So, 2-73 =· '-· __ .. ]?:....,E..,.,s==-.... M-=o.,_J ..:;IU_,,C:'-":.S.=--,.,....:;k!"'-<-A.._2.c..· _,,,t:3=--1-''tc..=B;;..___ Telephone No.: 2 s 3 -14-b -un U6\~pu\UO. lp\Type·4 .noa 7/U/96· 9 ,46AM/dj 6/Mq,{: da.ve.pecr,e.@•>-ti .viet /. /6/tzlt1 r-,:i-11, 4c:--' ·_ /IJ.J 'c.--;-25 ; ,;:: 2 j -. -.::., s \J '(. -- ! \ I -; ·-:: ·-.: ·-·:: ·-::: ··"':: ·-·::: ----·- _._.------------ ' Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning this application. File No's: L01TY401 & L01P0016 -Evendell Rezone & Plat Name:,_..,.!.<:.!...A,!.,;;U_1~1)--,,--·.:V1-.:.:.L::.::P._<_· ---,------'::..:..': _:=-_;:' ·:..:..·~· '_' ,-c':··7· ~---- Address: .s:i O ,J rJ /t AM~ v CAMA:AJo Ub,NQ/ WA if ~fv F96\1pra\UO. lp\Type·4 .~oa ?/ll/9'·9146AA/dj ® -··" :·.·, ~.['iJ',:";~:,rc:e~g~1:•nd Environmenra!Services onr.::e~T ! ~ ~IQ.t.i ce of App Ii cation 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest l UJ Renton, Washington 98055-1219 • C ,. c· u.O . .:..c·. j', • • Applican'i: Howard Stansbury U.S. Land Development Associates c/o Centurian Development Services 22617 8'h Drive SE File #'s: LOITY40I & LOIPOOI6 File Name: Evendell Rezone & Plat DOES Planner: Karen Scharer (Type 4) Bothell, WA 98021 Planner Telephone No. (206) 296-7114 Planner E-Mail: karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Date Application Filed: July 6, 2001 Date Determined Complete: September 20, 2001 Project Location: The site is located south of SE I36'h Street between I56'h Avenue SE and 160'h Avenue SE. Project Description: The proposal is to rezone 13 acres of property from R-4 to R-6 and to divide the site into 75 lots for detached single-family homes. Should the rezone not be granted, the applicant has proposed au alternative to subdivide a smaller portion of 11.46 acres under R-6 zoning into 44 lots foi; development o~ single-family use. Permits requested in this application: Rezone and Formal Plat Relevant environmental documents are available at the address below: Yes Development regulations to be used for project mitigation, known at this time: KCC 21A and KCC 19A Consistency with applicable County plans and regulations: This project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County Codes including Road Standards, Surface Water Management Design Manual, and Sensitive Area Regulatious. Other permits not included in this application, known at this time: Building Permits. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all of the required permits. A public hearing before the King County Hearing Examiner is required for this application. Notification of the public hearing date will occur approximately 30 days prior to the scheduled hearing. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) will issue a report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two (2) weeks prior to, the scheduled public hearing. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written recommendation on the rezone and decision regarding the plat which may be appealed to the Metropolitan-King County Council. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice ofrecommendation. / Any person wishing additional information 911 this proposed project should contact ODES at the address and/or · telephone number listed below. Written comments may also be submitted to DOES. You may review the application and any environmental documents or.studies in our Renton office. NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). Department<Jf Development and Environmental Services ./ Land Use Services Division Mailing Date: October 4, 2001 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 ==~ === = "·=·= . = _-/ = = ===== ====== = === ===== = == = === == = = === = I -' Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning this application. File No's: LOITY40I & LOIPOOI6 -Evendell Rezone & Plat Name: $kJQx\ § fQ,t·\ N\W'\(Ll) Address: ( ?;lJ d,D I lpl)-::&... Au€. 'S t_, ~PC«ltf\ )u.)f\-q '}sDSCf Telephone No.: F9'\,pn\ll0. lp\Typ,e-f. . i:ioa 1 /18 /96 · 9, 4 6AM/dj I .. ')8J ~· . . - = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =·o @ © @ u ¥ ~ -= = = =, = = = = = = = = Please send me notification of the public hearing laJ other official noticdsQdncerning this application. · u e1 o·· .. · o ~°"' ~ , .• • i ~1,.:.J I File No's: L01TY401 & L01P0016 -Evendell Rezone & Plat DON KEZELE Name: .. /j) or{ Kew le... K.C. D.D.E.S. 15857 S.E. 137th Pl. Renluri, WA 9805S Add 1 ress: /:S-fe.S-] ,~17 !..I) eC e~(\kA. WD CJ YOSJ'. Telephone No.: y~-= ~8--:>1..s--::i.._ ' F96\1pn\UO. lp\Type-4 .noa 7/U/96· 9 •46AH/dj i w~·I ; ,;~ ·~'' ? cnc ..... 0 211 -== ---===. = --=====·=-··--. = ·=======·-==·· == -, :, '~~~ :::.·: \=-~ Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerbiri~ ~is ap~;i:ati!J!l.-~ l,.. . I l '--"''"' I File No's: L01TY401 & L01P0016 -Evendell Rezone & Plat Name: ,.fl--t;.c,/e,..J Aiv"t> Y@r.'>NE. /.&-/.Jsc,,./ K.C. D.D.E.S. Address: /$:6// S £. l'.3f?'J2f ~L. ~A?Y:Z>~ 1 µ)A. 98'659 . ---------------Telephone No.: i}5'-,;};)/f.-cJJ'R~ 1c/1t/Jl F96\apu\ llO, lp\TYpe -4. ooa 7 / l8/ 9E. 9, 46AM/dj ------------ ----·-·-·-------------------·· Please send me notification of the'public hearing and other official notices concer'ltng:y-ii~·ap~l}catjpn~ Io) ls \:'.I le'. iJ u' Ls\ D File No's: L01TY401 & L01P0016 -Evendell Rezone & Plat \JU Qr. G , l l_: Name: Florence Nott ~ 1 I ~-- Address: 15915 SE 134th Pl. Renton, WA 98059-6832 F96\ep\,'1\l:ilO. lp\Type•f. .1_1oa 7/18/96·9 ,46AM/dj K.C. 0.0.E.S. te~pllc9ri'e'No.: ( 4 2 5) 2 28-24 7 2 / /()(10/(}f ~ !fforena ?{ptt 15915S.'£.134tli.!Pf. 'R...enJ:tm, ,WJ{ 98059-6832 , '9&0'S'S"t\.'a.\."3 0'2. !~r:.._, C~li:-_____________ I /;; P''1 • I• ----a, '&J c·· c ~.; a::-,.·~:-<. ::\ .- , ---......_ 'i!= ,....-----K r;;;1;· -J ·--.-___ ... ___ _ Dept. of Development & Envronmental Svcs. Land Use Service Div. 900 Oaksdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 / II, 1 .. 1 .. 1,11 .. ,, 1,1, ,I, I,,, ,11 .. 1,1 .. , Ill ,I, ,I ,I,, I, I,, .. I ,II ··- Please send me notification of the public hearing and other o·fficial notices concerning this application. File Name & No.: LOIPOOI 7 -Plat of A'Piandale Name: ~:[L-1.e.~~ J~-~-_ Address: ,;l d--.. ( 39--/ 0 .j f'f.._. 2 ~ ~&:c_ Telephone No.: ;;z..5'3 -f"~,;l.. -{ 3 ? 0 F96\sp;s\Type·l .no,;1, l/J0/98 clc t ftOfrl j SEP -4 2001 JJ ~~~A~_/KING CO LUSD \~\l i; ,\'fi"' yuRRENT PLANNING ATE RECEIVED '11' ·s ·_:ra·n·r, ·.'f 0 1 1 :Z i!d Ir; ,1,,1 fDOZ C .,., I .. l,:, , .... , l-. ~· j .., d 1., . I .. ; {.J -§._RA~L~Rll'E/IAr _____ 1•c. w, 7 .0 -Ir' --· ~ : CAP . 158. 77' CALC ',:De..... __ · EAST 'ilJ AC, H OE .• CDANEB. ·-··T-!'i. 8 --···-r ~ -E1~~1f1~7 ;;~:;~·;·· -.. -:: .. _~--~ ·-. TliE SOUTH LINE OF THE' N. £. J/4 FENCE CORNER 1$ ~1 ~ .JAHIJARY 15. 2001 DF THE S.W'. !/4' OF $.H. 1/4 . .5.4' SOUTH OF CORNER 18 1 FOUND pt.AT ~T OF SEC. 8-22-5. <?/{b {.. ,, ~ ofbl AT CALC'D POSITION O' g4' f O / " . . 'ACCEPTED" 0 l,<._-t, :_)() . '" \. ~ .JANUARY 15, 200~ . • FOUND -UIIENT 1N CASE -~ 01°1 NUJ.RY J 5, 2001 j UNO MONUM€NT IN CASE if. CORNER OF SEC. B-22-5 .JANUARY 15, 200. i FIJUIIO -NT : ~ 3J1.S4' ~27 MEAS. (~~ct----- • .i · ·1 311.59· cAlc·o~· 311 54' CALc·o , ~ " ' . ct . ct--== ~-~ <t . · S.E. 224TH ST ses ·20 CALC 'D 19HE SOUTH l!Nc SEC. 8-22-:5 952.96' MEAS. (952.61'! '• .. ' . '··. I. Custom w-inP availablo- Call for details. Photo Greeting Cards 4..8 ,.;ti, .... ,_ 25 50 75 100 200 P-. a. 6.u!. 500 1000 $19.99 $37.99 $49.99 $59.99 $115.99 $279.99 $539.99 Come in and -our entire se l.ection. ~-~ l Order yours toda 1 New style, to choose t om. Use your company logo-.~\.~~Omstmas Call for details. • l" IAI 1 :ET \EAK Easteid«t !'how Lat, 729 122"" Ave NE - &ellevue, WA 98005 - 4 20-403-1042 ~ . . ~ EASTSIDE PHOTO LABORATORY 729 122ND AVE . N.E . BELLEVUE , WA 98005 { 425) 453-1042 1 r-=1 File Letta LAST NAME FIRST NAME ADDRESS PHONE FILM SIZE 110 &-~~\.u~ KlNG COUNTY DEPT, DE DEVELO~NT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 900 Oakesdale A"e1ttte s l11 Renton, WA 98055-1219 oa west EXPOSURES~~~~~~- 126 35MM 120 220 080223 DATE TIME IN TIME DUE TWIN CHECK 5719 . §iidd Other .______.I ...__I ___.II....._ ___.I ....._I __ II.___ ___.II.___ ___.I .__I ____. PRINT SIZE FINISH QUANTITY D 3x5 0 MATIE OONESET 04x6 0GL0SSY )(rwo SETS >A ADVANCED O C C:=J ~ PHOTO SYSTEM REPRINTS L ENLARGEMENTS ENTER CASSETTE ID# 0 H C:=J ~'~~~~___.IDPc=] D SINGLES D DOUBLES TOTAL NO.OF D ;,-. APS £:%,PRINTS Special Instructions: No. of Prints D WALLETS D REPRINTS ~ 4x6 D 5x7 D 8x10 D 11x14 D 16x20 D 20x24 TAX TOTAL NEG. NO . QUANTITY @ @ @ @ @ Ev--..- e1002 \~ '-lll4lol.., c1999 Fort Johnson Photo Packaging W7002 EASTSIDE PHOTO LABORATORY 729 122ND AVE. N.E. BELLEVUE, WA 98005 (425) 453-1042 o 1997 Fort Johnson Photo Packaging EASTSIDE PHOTO LABORATORY 729 122ND AVE. N.E . BELLEVUE , WA 98005 ( 425) 453-1042 CJU.--.pt JUI 9liUDtt ,... W.W p .......... • -...- lllde or negative le wlllloul all-, warranty or llllblllty, and l'NO"'Y for any lncldental or con,equentlal damagee 1, excluded. Limit • one roll per envwlope. ! File Letter .._____. B nJ(e. t..c ~ ,-\t-~ ~ LAST KlNG COUNTY NAME DEPT DE,m;~l€ E!l..rtnno ,;;of'MENT ,1 ~n I ~:~ 900 yehkeNMENTAL SERVICES~LJ ADDRESS Renton, Wt1;g~'s~~~g Southwe s PHONE FILM SIZE 110 126 35MM 220 080212 DATE TIMEIN TIME DUE TWIN CHECK 1785 1 Slide Other ._____.I ...__I ___.I ...__I ____. ._____.I L.....-1 _____.I _I _____. PRINT SIZE FINISH QUANTITY D 3xs 0 MATTE OONESET ~4x6 OGLOSSY 0TWO SETS Jia ADVANCED O C c=) ~ PHOTO SYSTEM REPRINTS L ENLARGEMENTS ENTER CASSETTE 10# 0 H C:J ~' ~~~~-JIDPC:J 0 SINGLES 0 DOUBLES TOTALNO.OFD J'A APS ~PRINTS Speclal Instructions: No. of Prints 2-. OWALLETS 0 REPRINTS O 4x6 o 5x7 O 8x10 O 11x14 O 16x20 O 20x24 TAX TOTAL NEG. NO. QUANTITY @ @ @ @ @ E7002 @1999 Fort Johnson Photo Packaging y I 1 EASTSIDE PHOTO LABORATORY 729 122ND AVE. N.E. BELLEVUE, WA 98005 ( 425) 453-1042 FIRST NAME ADDRESS PHONE FILM SIZE KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DE1fELOPMEN'f AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 EXPOSURES __ ....;;:i;;.... -'='------- 609656 DATE TIMEIN TIME DUE TWIN CHECK 7982 -r 110 126 35MM 120 220 Slide Other .._____.I I I I '-l.. I I I I I I I .___I __.. PRINT SIZE D 3x5 x6 Special Instructions: No. of Prints FINISH ~ATTE DGLOSSY QUANTITY NE SET DTWOSETS REPRINTS/ ENLARGEMENTS NEG. NO. QUANTITY OWALLETS 0 REPRINTS O 4x6 O 5x7 O 8x10 0 11x14 O 16x20 O 20x24 QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL @ @ @ @ @ TAX TOTAL c 1997 Fort Johnson Photo Packaging '! . ·.;.:::>c Page I of3 DDES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Summary of Related Activities/Projects/Dev. Applicant: SBI DEVELOPING, LLC KURT WILSON Activity Number: Project Number: t LO!POOI_6 _J Development Number: PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 PRE-PLAT Status: RECORDED -----·-·-------------·------·=--:::--:::--:::--:::--:::--:::-====================== ----------·--· Activity/Project# Comp Type Status Fee Charges Hours Charges . _Paymen_ts Balance Due · $1)i4jo ~:,·)51i,Q~0,25, . : . · $27,395.45 $0.00 LOIPOOl6 , .. PRE-.~LAT · Rg<::ORDED AOOPOl64 A04BN275 A04BN364 A04BN4s2·· A04Cll68 'A04POl 19 .. A05BN262 ;A05BN392 A05Cll43 L02V0024 [L03RE03S) L04GF042 L04Gl143 L04Ml037 · L04PCl85 L04PCi86, *L04Sl188 *l04SR024 L04SR057 L04V0056'; . *L05FR017 L05PC044 ... L05PC081 L05Sl039; L05Sl040 i ,. PREAPP-0 MTG-HELD $93.05 $792.00 $885.05 $0.00 a6Nif ·R°E¢giv[J5 '.' · _$i'9)62,o(' · · · · 'Jfo§: $19;16i.oc(. $6.oo RECEIVED $529,600.00 $0.00 . $529,600.00. $0.00 . RE:c:EIVtti~'.,.-·)11:io§.<i.9': ·.··. ;Jo.oo_· $11,100.00 so.oo BOND ··.a_9'ND CERTINS EXPIRED $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 _PRi{Ari>:6 ·coMPLETil,. . ' (i5.6i •··. $1,52].47'. . $(53?:Q9 . . $0.00 BOND RECEIVED $37,072.00 $0.00 $37,072.00 $0.00 .. , ~oNp i, , ; qpgN " " , , .. · jq,go . :to,oo . .· ·$0.00 , · . $().oo CERTINS VALID $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SUBVAR ·. 9RANTE]) . · $93.50 fi,isS:60 j;i,lii!2,10 $0.00 REVISION PRELAPPR FOREST .a.il_.:-\N_ rn_. o.·.·.· ' ..... : . ,. G-lNSPCT L-MISC .... , CHANGE CHAJ:/9:f MONITOR COMPLET.E COMPLETE COMPLETE •. , '"""'""'''••' '.,,_ "'"''' ,., ",.,.J :.,, •. , INSPECT PUNCHLST :· sITEREV · ': c6MPLET1'=:"· SITEREV COMPLETE SlJBVAR" .· ' ·.G ... RA, ..•.... N_· .. TE_ .. D.·.· .•... ,':.' . ' ,.. . ' .. __ , .. ,,J,. FINAL COMPLETE cAA_NGE ... ·.• REi'1wc1- CHANGE RET/WCI INS~EQJ,: ';P.ENJ?~Gj:;;·· INSPECT PUNCHLST $114.72 $12,079.18 $12,193.90 $0.00 $\fof28J ··: jo.oq , $3,103.28 • $0.09 $5.07 $869.43 $874.50 $0.00 .$}02.~ . . JJ,\)15A3_ s;1,2cii'1.01 . $0.oo $205.28 $8,273.80 $8,479.08 $0.00 , ,:,$705J8I .: .::~1}4:79 .' .... · ~~31),~8 · •.. s;o.oo: $42,895.01 $0.00 $43,931.24 ($1,036.23) ·;, $4i'i,ss6)f'. . _jo:cio · ·· $48,586)9 ·· ···-· $0:0o: $102.64 $4,557.13 $4,659.77 ' ,)fi(~?. ,• ,${231~66, . .:.,$~,!_8Q}3 $157,588.78 $0.00 $157,588.78 ·· · s'10_:i:i,4' ..• 1i>.o_o ' fioZ:64 $106.80 $36.23 $143.03 ,,, .. :::l~~~-Ojioi:· :t ... :\-·.,::::li.~I~i-;~:'.';1 .. ·::·. ,:,1$.~~9qQ ... 64: $2,406.53 $594.11 $3,000.64 $0.00 ,· .. JO.OQ $0.00 . $0.00 $0.00 . L $0.0.Q, $0.00 ooc Page 3 of3 •••-••••··--··-• .... •••-•••••-" .. , ... , ... ,_.,.,,,,•,•----•••·--"'••••••••••-----•--•·•----•--•·•--•·•---•·•-•------•--•••-------·-----------------•-•-------•--•--•--m,. ....... The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to ODES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate In effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.0. soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 10, 2006 Summary of Charges and Payments Applicant: SB! DEVELOPING PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 Description Bldg FireFlo;y Rexiew Counter Service Fees Deposii Bas~4 on E~t H~S. SEPA Checklist Fee Sens A~e~ ,Rev Com Cornpli HOURLY FEE: Appeals-Lusd Eng. Review HOURLY FEE: Critical area review··. .. · HOURLY FEE: Engineering Plan Review HOURLY FEE: Fin~IApplication s"bm[t ' .. HOURLY FEE: Land Use Planning HQuru.:v FEE: SEPA '.A.ppeals •••. SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: ''• .. >· al.'C: j',!,1,., l.';•·,•r·• ',''I Page I of I L03P0015 PRE-PLAT PRELAPPR Amount $201.2~ $460.00 ... $3]2,56 $1,3~0.00 $948.75 $144.90 ..... J2{1,.5o $7,590.00 $379:50 $7,670.04 '$304.30 $19,632.80 Description Check# Checklogid Payee .check . . ···. 129• :'.. /} · ···•••·· '.:u) tAND.)2EYELQPf'1Ei{r /\8-~¢:c~ ·: .. Date Entered , ... : .. 5/19/2003 Amount ($i'i,i2i:i~) ($2,328.75) ·, ($14.00) ($68.80) Check 461 62236 US LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES 8/7/2003 Check 487; ·J .. 6f1247 . Qst.AN'i:>J?g"5,gi;§!'ME!{I'A§SQ¢.1.At¥:s ... ::. '1·016i2\)03 Check 70 I 65356 US LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOC 11/6/2003 SUBTOTAL PAYMENTS: ($19,632.80) BALANCE: ($0.00) ,,. ~-,-,,. ,_ ..... The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DOES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. soc DDES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 10, 2006 Page 1 of 4 ~-------------Hourly Charges De~t_a __ il __________ , Applicant: SB! DEVELOPING Activity Number: PO BOX 73790 Project Number: PUYALLUP, WA 98373 Development Number: Permit Type: 253 848 0820 Status: Function AP -LU/Subd/SEPA Appeals Task/Description • Permit I Plan Review Hearings/ Legal Process . Headngs . . . . . -... Name Org Workday .,L,11g1ey,;~_rf~ieii : .,,,",,346~ , JJjil61ioo4 Whittaker, Bruce 3473 05/10/2004 • ,\ : :(an-gley, k!iit~-"~.; : .: : 3461 , . .9.5Jo.:i1~~04 , .• -•.... · · Hearings Hearings Hearings Langley, Kristen .. 3464 .. o?_I0?/2004 · ,: ••.. · .': -):"!'gley ;~Kri~te~ --; L, -3,i~tl . 05/ I 0!2Q94, Scharer, Karen 3464 05/10/2004 Subtotal AP Function ER -Engineering Review Task/Description Name O_rg_ -· 3473 3473 Workday Permit/Plan R;vlew -. • Cheshier, Beth 0§11012003- 06/12/2003 06/l~/2003 06/17/2003 06/18/2003, • 05/28/2003 06/03i2003 · Permit I Plan Review . Permit/ Ph1tt Revie'lv Permit/ Plan Review Permit/ Plan Review Permit I Plan Review Permit I Plan Review Permit / Plan Review Permit i Plan Jl.evie"; ' " . Permit I Plan Review )\errrliti~lanll.eVi~w I ;'' Permit I Plan Review Permit I Plan Jl.evj,w Permit / Plan Review Pemiit i Plan Review . Permit/ Plan Review . _ Permit I Plan'Jl..eview Permit/ Plan Review pef!Ilit i Plan R~v'iei', Permit/ Plan Review .. Perm.it i Pian Reyie~ Permit/ Plan Review Cheshier, Beth . ' (':heshier;'Eieih Cheshier, Beth . Cheshier; Betti Whittaker, Bruce ·' w\iitlaker, Bruce' , 3473 3473 · .3473 3473 ·. 7347:i Whittaker, Bruce_ 3473 06/25/2003 . Whitta)<er, Brt1ce 3473• •.::,06i30fjpQ~ .·-;,~~.--- Whittaker, Bruce 34 73 07/07/2003 ····:_:%ittag~r;Bi:\fce1 ,JI, •j4)3'.:co119~/~()Qf, Whittaker, Bruce 3473 07/10/2003 .' Whitta~.:~;'si{i~;; 3473'0''o'i11oizfo3 Whittaker, Bruce 3473 07/25/2003 _\Vl]ittlik~r,'~,;;~t' :r J473·····,;:oshs12003c r Whittaker, Bruce 34 73 09/24/2003 · \viiiitaker,iiruce 147.3 ·· 'iciilii12ofo , , Whittaker, Bruce 3473 11/12/2003 CWhittakti{i3i'u~e . .'.C '3473 _j:i1q7;:io9t ,: Whittaker, Bruce 3473 12/04/2003 ··• :y.i'hiit~~•r:Jlruce:·:• '.i4'73,': 1~1oshQoJ Whittaker, Bruce 34 73 12/08/2003 L03P0015 PRE-PLAT PRELAPPR Hours 6}{'. LO (LO) §'is I.I 3.1 Hours 0.75. 0.75 LO. 1.25 4.75 0.5 LO LO l.Q LO 2.0 2.0 LO 1.0 LO 1.0 -· 1.0 LO 1.0. LO L5. 2.0 Amount J36j3 $144.90 $]4,f:9Q ($144.90) $)0S:1is $159.39 $449.20 Amount $103,50 $103.50 $13g.oo $172.50 $655.50 $69.00 . ,J138.QO $138.00 $138,90 $138.00 $276,00_ $276.00 $138,00. $138.00 $138.00 $138.00 .. ·s;i.JS:oo- $138.00 .$138.00 $138.00 .. ~207,00 $276.00 soc Task/Description ···· Peqniii}'.lan. Jl,eyf~w Pennit / Plan Review Name Org Workday · ·. ·. ·. W11i~a1<.,, a,~fr :. J4ti. 'J}hoiioO:i Whittaker, Bruce 3473 01/22/2004 Hours 'I''" Page 2 of 4 Amount $138.00 $144.90 !'eqnii7i>lii,Jl,ex(eti . ; • t ,Whittaker; ~\11R•-·:: . ..F?t .QtG~/~9Q4 ' . . LO 1.0 LS, .. .. -~211)}1 Pennit / Plan Review . PermitlPlakReview .·· Pennit / Plan Review ' Pe~it'/P)~:Jle·~i~;·· i''I Penn it/ Plan Review . Pemii"i/ Piary Rbvie~ Pennit / Plan Review •••• < • ~-,,.. -~~-, ' Pe.nnit / !'1.~n.R~.vi_ew Permit/ Plan Review _Penni!./ Pll!I)•Reyie,'>¥ Penni!/ Plan Review 'Penni!/ Plan Revi.ew · Hearings 'Fi~ld ciieck Field Check Subtotal ER Function FR -Final Review Task/Descr_i_J?tio~ Penn it/ Plan _Revi~w. Permit/ Plan Review Subtotal FR Whittaker, Bruce 3473 01/27/2004 , .,WJiiUak•r:J3~c:e , ·.• ;?4i3;, 01hs1209~ .... · Whittaker, Bruce 3473 01/29/2004 _\Vliittaker:,B;.;;£;; , 34ff :/01ho12,oq4,:· Whittaker, Bruce 3473 02/02/2004 ·· %iiiake;;i'i;:;;_c:.;: ...... '34:if ''o:iio1i~oo,r····· Whittaker, Bruce 3473 02/11/2004 . ¥,ittaker, ~rue•~ · · · 34_i:i . 9~12<iJioo<i Whittaker, Bruce 3473 05/03/2004 '1,)\lltittll\(er~Ii11!~~ ; : ,1.3473. 05/0~/2094 Whittaker, Bruce 3473 05/07/2004 'I ,Whittaker "Bruce' '.. ~ '... ~-'· ' ~-... ''' 3473 05,ho1209{. Whittaker, Bruce 34 73 02/24/2004 · ·. de~iii.~. ~ei11 J47f 06/1012003 Whittaker, Bruce 3473 10/21/2003 Name Org Workday .. ! ,f'loi~iii,.Rayll)gi)g,: I I, .. I )11:f:,, ]sio1j7q9:J .•.. :, : Meins, Michael 3473 08/07/2003 Function GO -Geological Review . Task/Des,cripti~n Pennit / Plan Reyie',¥ Pennit / Plan Review Penn it/ Plan Review -.. ,.,.,,,,,,,., ,,,,, '"'"'''"'" ''"'''""'''"'' Permit I Plan Review .. Permit /.Plan Review' . Subtotal GO Name Org Workday \Yest, L_awre~.ce 'i:i16 01ii§iiiioo3 West, Lawrence 3470 06/16/2003 .. wesih·~~en~i,:· : , .· .·;;410.: ... oz/97129gf West, Lawrence 3470 07/09/2003 • ; ,,,.· W~s(Lawierice , ··1 '3470'", 07/24/2003/ Function PR -Land Use Applications Review Task/Description Name Org Workday Pennit / Plan Review Scharer, Karen 3464 06/02/2003 . Penn it/ Plan Review , .. , . S~harer, K~~en ... 3464 ' 'o6!16i2Q03 . Permit/ Plan Review Scharer, Karen 3464 07/07/2003 Penn it/ Pia~ Reyi~')' . . , . Schl)rer, ](arery .· 3464, I Q/01/2003 ·, . , Hearings Scharer, Karen 3464 02/24/2004 Project Coordinaiion · , , ., Clatissen; Kimlterly · 1 • • 3464 , , ,Q~i22/'.29Q31 Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 06/04/2003 · Project¢oordinatici~ .' 11}c_hifr~F;'i<;;,~;;. ,,,;: .. ···,·•'I. 3464: :O~iO§i~\)03 Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 06/17/2003 Project coorcii~aifan , .···· . ~c1ta~e{i<afrn _ . '.. .• .::.. 3464'. :06/J 7)~9_0:f".' ,. I., .• ,,, ',·'1 , . .,,r,··· 2.0 ,.2.0 1.0 , i:o 1.0 0.5 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.5 '" 1.0 0.5, 4.0 3.5 1.0 54.0 Hours .,g.25 2.5 2.75 Hours 1.25 .. 1.5 -~· .. 1.0 1.25 1.0 6.0 Hours 2.5 i:s 0.4 1.0 4.2 .J.5' 0.2 o.i 0.3 $289.80 ~~89,80 $144.90 $\'.44:90 $144.90 .... ~$72.45 $144.90 ~2-89.80 $144.90 . , $72.45 $144.90 ·.$72.45 $579.60 $483:00 $138.00 $7,590.00 Amount $34.5Q $345.00 $379.50 Amount ~0.00 $0.00 J0.00_ $103.50 $138.00 $241.50 Amount $345.00 $207.00 $55.20 }i38.00 $608.58 $207.00 $27.60 . $13,80 $41.40 :§.1············ .. $9§.60 SGC Task/Description Name Org Workday Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 06/25/2003 Proj~ct ¢9ordlnii{1011 :I!iiiar~i,Kai:?ri' ' -----3_4M -oiliiii:fofo '' - Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 08/14/2003 ,Proje,ct C\ioi:4\'!atici_n , , -scha,rer;I<ru:~11' : :-_ ' :· 3464 \io9/g3j2oiii----', Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 09/29/2003 · , .... ,.' -'"' • • >'···••, > '"''"T"'''"'"'"C''';m,,•n»;'""''C:"P/ n•t"r•' ,., .. '''' •,•s,•nn·,•»'"'•'»''''''"f • Pr -t C d-1· S h K __ 3-46-4 il_0/16/20-_03 __ -_-_-____ _ · " ..... OJ~.~-... 09,r .. )P..ct~q~ __ .. ,j.,, .. ,,,,,.,.."_.,,,.,,.,-~ -~~~' ,.._a.~~!J ... ~ .-... , ..... ,: ...... -_____ ... . Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 l l/03/2003 Project cci_ci_rdinatib~:: -:sifoi~f;:l(~r~r;::,·:--' --}\§4'1;,:i)f!~12oof:. Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 11/17/2003 Project cciorcii11aHon --i' 'scharer Karen ' ' ,, 3464'' 'Tiio3h66:f'', 1 ' '-'' ' ---- • ;, > ,,,,,,,• •,,•,•,, ,,,,,•, ,,,,..,: ,,l,1;:,::!.L..,.,<>,•»'>><>> ,,,,,n,,,,w,k• ''~"'''••'•'"'"'"'''I"'""'""''"'"''""'"~''""~"';;+, .. •;,_ Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 01/20/2004 J>rojectcdoriiination , :$ciiar~r, If~r~n, :F6;!' _ oii26i2004.'"' Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 03/08/2004 P~oject c;oqrdiif~tion -Scliarer, K~re~ ' -' 3464 _03/18/2004 Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 03/24/2004 Project,Coorclination' -----Sch,fr~fI<ar~ff ,-· '' --3464 '04/(9)2004 -- Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 05/03/2004 -field Che,){:_ --'}ch~r~i-.Kafi,if ----'· 3464_' _§~1.11!2003 Public Contact Scharer, Karen 3464 07/08/2003 P---b·l-·c------,t-t""-· ----··s··--h,,,-,,-, ,K--.,,., .,,-, ---,_,,, .. 3--4-,6-__ -4'-_'·.-_·o·_-_7·_·;··1·_-5-'1·2··0·0···-3·_-_7 ___ --_--. ~ IC 9n _ac .. -' _____ c arer,_, aren__ _ . Public Contact -_ public C(!nt<\ci Public Contact ---Public ¢qntact Public Contact --Public Con\~ct Correspondence •-· , ·· ··r ':', .. ,.,... .., ... ,,.,., f·-·r. _ . _ Cor;espondence ___ 1_ ,_ • Correspondence Scharer, Karen 3464 07/17/2003 . : sch~?lr:Kare~ '· ;J464 ·011_1_71_2903 ,_,;. Scharer, Karen 3464 07/22/2003 ' -__ :S~hare(K!'f'~~ _ ' 3464 '. 6~/J3i~9of - Scharer, Karen 3464 08/25/2003 -:sciia,~r:'Kru:eri --" ' -:14~4-. ,1p9312q_o.i __ -- scharer, Karen 3464 06/17/2003 .' s~nai'~, .. Kiir'~;,. 1 __ J464 , -061!_812003 - Scharer, Karen 3464 06/26/2003 c;9rrespon~~;;:ce '··: ,:'l'l''••"'''!''·'''it'."' ·;11,:·, "''r' Sch~re~, I<aren -_ _ Scharer, Karen :_:·$cfo~te!, _K~~ri :.:~ :: Correspondence . :-corresponcienc~ ' , Scharer, Karen -:-·sdi~·r~i'.:K.fll"i~·/1 r _.-· - Correspondence --c&rresp9ncte11c.( ··-· ------ Scharer, Karen ··.i ·s~ti~~r;)<.~~1{ __ ·: _·. Correspondence ... , ' ,', ' ' ,, .. ,, .. ',,p.•; Correspondence. -- Scharer, Karen Meetings -: Meeting~ Meetings ,,;:,,r_,:·,,' ;,';'~6'9#~r;:·~~rin·n·,·l''i :---_-Me6tings'··:' 1,,, Report Preparation Repcirt Pi~paratl_ohi' Report Preparation ---R,6portPrep~raiioif Report Preparation Subtotal PR Function TR -Traffic Review Task/Description Traffic' Review - Traffic Review Traffic"·Revtew·, Traffic Review Scharer, Karen SChar~:r\kfileif 1 "" · - • >. ·-· ·' • ~·-• ''. Scharer, Karen sEharer "Kareri , , ' . " . ,, . '·-.. -.... " ; Scharer, Karen __ i.~1-S£~afef/Kc1!_en ,,,, Scharer, Karen Name -Limgley, Kristen - Langley, Kristen Langley, ~iJte_n--- Langley, Kristen 3464 12/18/2003 _----3464 ' 12i2~hoo_3;; , __ _ 3464 02/12/2004 :_ 34§4:·02/19i2Q04;:-:-_ 3464 02/23/2004 3464 --! !)5710/2004 3464 07/09/2003 : 3464' 121i ii12o(jj--_ ... _- 3464 12/08/2003 -3464..' o_:i]j2i2004\- 3464 02/02/2004 346(--'-92L_Q3!20Q4.:': _ -- 3464 02/04/2004 . '34\;4'.--oiios12604:- 3464 02/05/2004 Org 3464 3464 -346~ 3464 Wo~kday , 0810712003 08/11/2003 -' ,-!2/08/200f' - 02/23/2004 .' :... :.:. Page 3 of 4 Hours Amount 0-3 $41-40 0:1 --$1:\.80 0.2 $27.60 ·0-2 $27-69 0-5 $69.00 Q-r $?7-60 0-3 $41-40 ' fii $27-60 0.5 $69.00 · 0.5 --$69.00 0-3 $43-47 "oj, -$43-47 0-3 $43-47 o_r ' $14-49 OA $57.96 o_[ r: ,·: $14-49 ·-~~ . 0.2 $28.98 1-6 _ $220.80 0-2 $27.60 - $27.60 ·0;2 , ... 0-2 $27.60 0-1 $13.80 0-2 $27.60 '0;1 _-. $13.80 0.1 $13.80 -$27,60 0-2 LO $138.00 1-? -$_207.00 0.2 $27.60 LO .$138.00 3.0 $414.00 LO '$138.00 0-5 $72-45 ·03 ~43,47 2-5 $362-25 -0-2 $28,98 L25 $172.50 02 . $27.60, LO $138.00 -0-2 $28,98 2.0 $289.80 ,2.0 $289.80 3.0 $434.70 2.5 $362,25 0-5 $72-45 43.85 $6,186.54 Hours Amount 0-5 , $69.00, L5 $207.00 ,1-?-$207,00' 0-5 $72-45 .. soc Tr~ffic R,eyiew . . J:Iearings. .M~etipgs\ .. Meetings Subtotal TR ii ..... , .. ·Kr:-·· .. ·· -' .... -·3 .. 4.·.·6.4 ... ·' "o .. 5 .. ,i.·.o .. ·3.-.1.·.2 .. 0.-.0.·.4.-.... ·. ' .. l.:,.',~p.g, ey, ;,, ,. J~t~Q.:, .... I ., , ,I Langley, Kristen 3464 02/24/2004 [i:a11gley,:l(fiSti~,',, . , ! I ,',}~§{i , .2?/()9(20,f{ ,. Langley, Kristen 3464 12/08/2003 Function WL -Wetland Review Task/Description Name Org Workday 0 ''" ·: W"' r:• p,-·,· '! ,-·-<·:,, "l!f"'',mF''I Penni! /'Plan Revi.ew. Conference confere.nc~ Field Check Subtotal WL TOTAL: "'"""' I''" r.cr: "'cli'IJy'/Ea;&a' ' "'.'.i 1''3~zo''''J.6-~02J~!i§t:· .. Casey, Laura 3470 07/08/2003 ¢a~ly,Ja~ra~' 3410 :' 'o'iio9iioo'r ,. . Casey, Laura 3470 07/08/2003 Page 4 of 4 1,0 $144.90 3.5 $507.15 . .0 .. 75 $103.5,0 1.25 $172.50 10.5 $1,483.50 Hours Amount <.6:S 'sii:oo 0.25 $0.00 ,_Q'.5 ·. $<>:OO 0.5 $0.00 1.75 $0.00 121.95 $16,330.24 . . . ' ' . .. . . . '. ' -' . ] The hours shown above represent the actual hours of service charged on this permit to date. Hours worked that are covered by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly charges not covered by a base fee are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O . .............................................. ,_.,_ ... , •..... ,, ___ ,.,_, ______ ,, ........................................ ,.,, .. ,,.,,.,,., ... ,,.,,:,. ..• , .. ,.,, .•. ,.,.,, ......... _._,,,,, _______ , .. , .. '" ___ ,,., __ , ___ , __________ . -----. ·-----. -·-·--·-·--·--·---·--·----, -----·-----·--- soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055·1219 August 10, 2006 Page I of I Summary of Charges and Payments ~-.C..----------------, Applicant: CERT OF INS EXPDATE: 9/27/06 Description SUB TOTAL CHARGES: l'ay1rn;111s - Description Check# Checklogid Payee SUB TOT AL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Date Entered A05Cll69 L03P0015 CERTINS VALID Amount $0.00 Amount $0.00 $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to ODES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. ·------'--------------"·__;·•--------·~---=-·--".: ________ .. ------------------------. . --. -------.. ---.. --.. _.'. -" . _ ... -. -.. _. -. -____ -----·-·--·---.. ·-·-··---.. ----·-·-- soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 July 31, 2007 Summary of Charges and Payments Page 1 of 1 ~---------··--·----~------·------------------------ Applicant: SBI DEVELOPING, LLC Activity Number: L07PC083 Description KURT WILSON PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 Oepqsit B~sed onilstHrs Site Inspect Counter Fee SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Description Check# SUB TOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Checklogid Payee Project Number: Development Number: Perm it Type: Status: Date Entered LOIP0016 CHANGE PENDING Amount $1;400.00 $205.28 $1,605.28 Amount $0.00 $1,605.28 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DDES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DDES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. .spc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August to, 2006 Page I of I Summary of Charges and Payments ~-=---------------, Applicant: SBI DEVELOPING, LLC ATTN: RICHARD BARBER P.O. BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 (253) 848-0820 Description C:ounter ServiR~ Fe~.s ·.· Deposit Based on Est Hrs Ffoance Charges ; . HOURLY FEE: Site Inspection SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Description Check # che~k i ' ,,· .t4804 ,: . SUB TOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Checklogid . Pay~e . _ 88456 . ' \ SB! DEVELQ~ING LLC. ------------· Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Date Entered . I 0/26/2005 L05SII08 L03POOl5 INSPECT PENDING Amount $102.6~ $1,883.69 , $27,]1. $724.51 $2,737.95 Amount ($2,737.95) ($2,737.95) ($0.00) The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to ODES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid _in full before DOES issues Final Approval,T,C.O._ or C.O. DOES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August to, 2006 Applicant: SBIDEVELOPING,LLC Hourly Charges Detail Activity Number: ATTN: RICHARD BARBER Project Number: P.O. BOX 73790 Development Num her: PUYALLUP, WA 98373 Permit Type: (253) 848-0820 Status: Page I of I L05SII08 L03P0015 INSPECT PENDING ·····-····-----·-·--------------·--·--·--···-····-·-··---· ······-------··-·····-··----···---·-·-··-··-·······--------·--··-·--------·---· Function SI -Site Inspection Task/Description Name Org Workday Hours :•··rj~'¢o~siru2ii&rig;orif,r~hc~·1.,;;r••; •···•• '¢Hi~!i\mi:fihlotiiyi·,.:•e i!i.~477.i •06@iii<iQ~c,;;::,•,;:r1•·.·•··· .. ., .. ,_,.,. .. Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 3477 08/12/2005 : r:J<9~4·11#·$p~~~~Qh:~1:1 :r: ::g~;~illWrrtffil.qihY'.'.?i{rnt:~It)·1·;::;g·~'tJ1a:qQ}I!:U :i::::b ... ~ Special Meetings (Inspections) Cheatum, Timothy 3477 08/16/2005 ·R··· :··, x;-"''';&''"\:'c'""i: ;-;,·i";: '·>·1>> ')'''.:;;r::n::1,nT;: :':.. ;:.,.c i''c''··'h':!"' "'')TnT:·,T···~·:n::·:'th''' ,.:,1 ;·:1 ,7'3"4'"''7"""7' 'Tfto""8'<1···.c6··1·2··0· ··0'''5''!":;ii::c~l'''Y!T' i;::::n ev1.ew. · •ommen s ::: •. ri•:,::: .• ::: ;.: •· : eatum;. Jmo. yr:::::::, .. :r ... _ 1 . :,,:,;:,:•-:::::::'· •' Subtotal SI TOTAL: 0.75 5.0 5.0 --=~~~==~===~~,~~~== Amount . .. ,$253!58 :.t; .1;: .. ,", , ••..• ·'' $108.68 $72.45 fff7j5 $724.51 $724.51 The hours shown above represent the actual hours of service charged on this permit to date. Hours worked that are covered by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly charges not covered by a base fee are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before ODES is_su_e_s Final Approval, 1" ,c,o: or_ C.O, soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055·12 l 9 August I 0, 2006 Page I of I Summary of Charges and Payments ~-=--------------, I Applicant: CERT OF INS EXPDATE: 10/1/05 Description SUB TOTAL CHARGES: z~ ,~--, - l'avmenls Description Check # Checklogid SUB TOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: The fees shown above represent current charges as provided to ODES at the time of application. Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Payee Date Entered A04CI168 LOIPOOl6 CERTINS EXPIRED Amount $0.00 Amount $0.00 $0.00 date and are an estimate based on the information For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be __ l)ille~~~~he_'.11>!'_~"._an~_~(!_~~"'."'.~~~-~-~1>~!~-i~-!~~~~-eJ~_i:!~~-~~i~_!~!"'.~'.~_'.'_(~~~r~~~l,_!:S:():_~~-S:()·__ _ _ ____ _ __ soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August I 0, 2006 Summary of Charges and Payments Activity Number: Applicant: CERT OF INS EXPDATE: 10/1/06 · Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Description SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Description Check# Checklogid Payee Date Entered SUBTOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Page I of I A05Cll43 LOIP0016 CERTINS VALID Amount $0.00 Amount $0.00 $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to ODES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. Ail fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. ------··----·------·---·---··--·------···-··---····--···---··----·----·----·-··----------··----·---·--------·--·-·------~-- Page I of6 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Project Management Statement Project Name: L01P0016/EVENDELL PLAT Project Location: 13606156TH AVE SE 581 DEVELOPING LLC KURT WILSON PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 Statement Date: Customer: Permit#: Project#: Parcel Number: Permit Type: Status: Project Management Statement Managed Project Hours Budget: Total Hours Worked (see Hours Detail): Total Budgeted Hours Remaining: Fixed Fees: Description counter service Fees·. ~,. Finance Charges Total Fixed Fees: Managed Project Hours Budget: f ' .,.,, , C-,, > .Tot.ilM.inagedOf/roject ~udgElt ' '' '' ' ,,·'-'•· ', ,•,:' i-1;1 'Total'Amount D,eferred: :, '1 i,;'f, ,,, ',:,'i' ;AMOUNT DUE AT APPLICAJION: , ,r!, ;. Installment Payments: . Scheduled for.10/1 /2004 . : ,· Scheduled for 11/1/2004 Scheduled'for 12/1/200<1 .. 0':, Scheduled for 1/1/2005 Scheduled for.2/1 /2005, ... Scheduled for 3/1/2005 , ',ScheduledforA/112005'. :. ·· Scheduled for 5/1/2005 . · .ScheduledOfor.6/1/2005·,· '"':.· ,,;, Scheduled for 7/1/2005 Scheduled for 811/2005 · Total Deferred Installments: Pa ments: '>i,I,.,, ,-~. ,, .... "I•' -, ·:s::i,• Amount .•. :'.$102'.6<!' :.:c··. $46.87 $149.51 $42,745.50 ,1,.'.,'. ,:,».,l,,,e,. .•. •· '. t·· $0.00 $21,372.75 ', ,,IL' .. ----.. $0.00 Date Posted Payment Type CkloglD Amount Check# 9/10/2004 Check . $8,651, 7 4 .. . . . . 3796 .. ~2/.13/2004. ·' .•Check': '.:'c:•:: I:. .;:,:,,0::,1 '.Y.:',::i ,.$17,553.33 ,,.,.:::,,:, U 1 •• 3999,,,,. 12/16/2004 Transfer To L04PC185 . . . ($4,274.56) ·31212005 Trarisfed=:romLo4PC~86;,, •!.' ,. ,, , (',$52S'ss;:Tr ,:t:i, 3/2/2005 Transfer From L04PC185 $1,608.40 ., ·3/3/2005 .'.Cti8bk'•·.··:.'.,· ·::r:r·(:':':·iT>., \·i·hE;:_·: .. \i/ .... $5;584:3·11:;/::~.·:.:;J:<:.L':;JT,:t,,:4·~ 6.1 ·1 • 4/5/2005 Transfer From L04SR024 $1,744.15 .,,. 5/3/2005 lChe.ck''':,,':i"{r ,'Ci(r \,::;;::, :.rr, .. ,82327[' :'1::• a'.:,:•. :"':;$i\,2<12,2J'" .... , .. ''i\3)6 ,'. · .. 5/19/2005 · Check 82927 $5,137.28 4393 ·····~i~~~~gg 5 . {~;;:erFrcim,L0<1Y0056'iic~6l;4f '$l~~{gf,,/ ::r.:4711 · 8/9/2006 L04Sl188 L01P0016 1423059022 INSPECT PUNCHLST 295.00 244.20 50.80 Due Now . ' $102.64 $46.87 $149.51 $21,372.75 $21,522.26 $77}.19 $777.19 $777.19 $1,602.96 . $1,602.96 . $2,639.22 $2,639.22 $2,639.22 • $2,639.22 $2,639.22 . $3 675.39 $22,408.98 · 10/17/2005 ,',ChecKl,r'' ,!',,880J3,i,'.i:t'.' ', ,,,.,/ I $23:131 .. . .4.778 . I,, : , i\•. ·, 11/16/2005 Check · 88995 $1 036.23 4882 Total Payments Received: ($43,931.24) Page 2 of6 $0.001 ;,:·.:· , '/ ·'•,·;:;, ,'.,'.'"(:;r:·:,1"""·1· '" ,:,11!';;· ,•,,;;.'i';!.1;:-:,.,:,i'; ,: i"•' ·. . ' . ' . ,T9t!!I. ~alc1n~~:,,. . . . . ' ' ,. ,.1 Disclaimer Language for Permits under Project Management Based on permit information submitted by the applicant, the Department of Development and Environmental Services has determined the amount of review fees for the subject application. The fees shown do not include ancillary permit fees, project-related mitigation fees, or any other fees that are passed through to the applicant from other agencies or as part of the project's environmental review. Fee estimates are based on information submitted to DOES by the applicant prior to finalization of the permit application. In addition, estimates are determined by utilizing historical data gathered from projects of similar type, size, and scope. DDES's fee estimate is subject to revision under conditions Including, but not limited to, the following: 1) Unknown or undisclosed site or project issues 2) Changes in the project 3) Incomplete information from applicant 4) Errors in applicant information or submittal 5) County code fee changes 6) Appeals Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. For billing questions, please call 206-296-6659 Page 3 of6 Permit Number: L04Sl188 Statement Date: 8/9/2006 Hours Detail Function Task Name Workdate Hours Financial Guarantees Mana Financial Guarantees Mgt. & Mon Graves, Stacy 9/7/2004 0.50 .·. ,:i,"R!OJ8.C:t';M~J8'Q~JTI.Bi\t!.!tr.> ii::\. 'i:; {_:"'('p~i-niif(P18b. Re~~l~~'i.':';-;,'i,/~1;.:•,:,:: <·-·~:,. '".1.'F~iEIYtJB.tlf~Y' .-:.~::,. ··-... ,.9./B[?OO~., ',OJ30 Project Management Project Management Fee Estimating Pray, Jeffrey 9/8/2004 1.00 .... Firi811Cl8i"'GU.af~Qt8'~·~ M8!).lf···1 ')=fri~i'ri_~iBf.'.~'ilS'f8'1li8~~-. ~~#e_ii5f 1;::'1_':t. .·: t' i , __ 1: 1TJ3~~v.~.S,;)3_t9.cy_· _911)g0:9.4:., 9:5~ Project Ma .. nage_ment Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Je~ey 9/17/2004 0.20 , . E.f P;~g -~~-Q~g~~~nr.·;... ' ,_. .. Cfofoi,,'U"rl'i'CSfoirlST'Staff 'C'1iO'FdfnaTiOn"1\'"C. '"I'" TT/:' 1':"?'~r.ay: )8_~ref:'.,'.''; '· · -· ·~· ~ · ~/1 (t?Oo{ 0.i~ Site Inspection ····-p·;:e.COrlSfr-UctiOri c0rlf8re"iiC8 ...... ,, ···-· ... . Cheatum, Timothy 9/17/2004 2.00 ,Sif~, ,~SP.eciion: 1 · •. ' I . ' '''. ·1.e·r~~OffSt.r.l!c.t.lq[IJ'.:fBPj'.i'~tJ.~.r::... ",., /· ... , . '~ ¢'~8~j_ij_~·;Jiln~tb{' ·: ·:·)111 't /?Q'b',f ' ''"1·.00 Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 9/17/2004 0.75 ::ltte inspeciicin. ..C:liiaiiiig(C3ra~fiigJ,jsp~ctions p,eafum; :nmoihy .· sii1i_i6~.: 6.25 Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 9/21/2004 0.75 · : . :pi~:~r;:i:\~:,:,~-~ifr&_~,~~s,M~·n~t :·;:~. 1 ~.r~~j~,:~-i;(¢.~.ctITT~~.~-.. PfJ~-~~ra~~-~ ... ·-~-. · · : . _gr~.Y~~:-.$!~9Y.-:.... ]1291f90(, ·· · ·oJp Financial Guarantees Mana Processing Certificates of Insurance Graves, Stacy 10/7/2004 0.50 ,. SiteJrlSpe_'ciion·:'·· , ;tf~~r;~g/qr.~~j_~g:)h!iiPecti9~~:~::.-:: \·:,{I"· -, ¢h~~~'fu,Jiry,9fhy .. .,,... J!)/~£2.Q_()~t, 1.'.?~ Site Inspection Communications-Public Interest Cheatum, Timothy 10/12/2004 0.25 •"?it8 .. _lnSj:,'~ciiOo" "'I • '1 .,. ··c,~~ri~Q/G_ra~in9 :l~·sp~~i~.~S:'r ·,'," . _"¢h,~~fi.i.ni', ,tirji,(!fhy/' ', . j0/14!.iQ"Q~ 9}b Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 10/14/2004 0.75 · ·· °f:>rOj8¢f ~fa'h'SQ'etne'~t_. _·:·, ,,r,t··· .. ,-r commGr11cat1onS' ~· staff ·c·oordinStiori' · .. · ~ray-;7~_effr~v·.··_ '" .. Ji}h_5i~oo~. ; ·. :.0:40 Site Inspection C1eSrinQtGi8dfrig·'1·nsp8CtiOnS .. " · Cheatum, Timothy 10/15/2004 0.75 _site ·_i.~_Sp~.ct_io·rr -Ti~V~_i Tirri~ .. ,., ... ,.,. 1·_~· .'~· ·r,: ghefB.l~~;:·1)fnQt~y·~· '.· . ·: .19tf5/~0b4 .. ··:.1." o.75 Site Inspection Cl_eari~g/~rading. Inspections Cheatum, Timothy 10/19/2004 1.00 .. $'1t8Ji,SpeCtiorli '".~i~,1ng~ '. ·· .. ~., ~·;·:;-. ~.~·.:,·:. · ~:. u ..... ', '"r·· .'. ·_·,:r~~-.,' ..••. 1 ~-.. _ . "_'~'"¢.hi~f~!TI;jjiff9iby:··"" __ 1_01JJJl?Q04. .tf?O Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 10/19/2004 0.75 · siieinspe.:tion-__ · :Gomm-unicaHons:-}eiei,hone . . .. , ·'-· :¢ffeati.!iii,J:ir11ofhy __ jo1211;1004 o:sq Site Inspection Erosion Control Cheatum, Timothy 10/21/2004 0.75 Sit~Jnspe"cti9n•·.i .:.:.tra.y~LIJr,je: --;:: ... -~ .. : ... ---,,~-· ·-· ·-.:::1:-'.'..C:b~a@ii,:T.h:iiot~y .·· .. , .. 19/?1/2004 O,I5 Project Management Field Check Pray, Jeffrey 10/22/2004 0.75 i ··.-·:pr9je9(~~Q~gerrj~r,:c; r.: .. '.:t~.v~ITlffi~.,-'~.:.::;;(l~~~;t'ti,,,,.,dr; , .. ,.,.,.:, .: ,,.,,,: ..... -··.1:/~~: ... ~[~Y.I~ftr.'~Y ... :-.·.~: .. ,.:-t-··:rq~~Z?.OQ:4.'-OAQ Site Inspection Clearing/Gradmg Inspections Cheatum, Timothy 10/22/2004 0.75 sTie 1iisiiei:tion' ·, . , , :i':,fra.ve\;;nme.' "\, .. , :.:,., ,,:, , · , , . , cheaiui:i,, Timothy;-. }01i;utoo,i; 0.75 Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 11/2/2004 0.30 ''sit~~In~P~cli(?~_r '!:' i" ,hi" ('." • ''.\':!,' EfoSiOll Cfoflfror' :;· '!:·1·:·> " w,_:.i:~ch8~i-~ITffJilli(?!fo1 ~t::' .'.1 H212QQ4 . . 'O}~ Si_te 1.nspecti_o.n Travel Time 9h13atum! Timothy 11/2/2004 0.75 -_Siie l_rj_S~C_t!on' ;~ ''l'''~'.~'r.O~i_Oflj~~-P~'~-iQ~·~~j3U!@ii9'JriV~i_''"'" "'','i"!:I ! :'• ·:r'"cb'8~tUi-fi;-_tifli~trjY:~: .. :.·_:_.)1/t/?09-4" '''.):.75_ Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 11/4/2004 0.75 · .. siteJnspecilqri' · · siie:C,ia1 Me~ti_rigS:@siieciions>·· i.. ···,· ctieaJui:i,,Jii:iioilii~ o· :~'11/9i2oo(::·· 1.00 Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 11/9/2004 0.75 :, .. e.f?j~~ .. M~.rT~Q~)rj_~i=if ·. -'·.communiciatforls ~ staff·cooidiri.StiOri .. -.: . .P.f~YJ.~ff~~y ~-··.. 1 .~·· ~-~··: {1/}q/20~ · · cf20 Project Management ...... com·mun-iCB'iiOris-~··staff ·coordiii8ti01'\' Pray, Jeffrey 11/1712004 0.25 ! i; ;_Sittj!.:ln.sP~6t.1.o_rj· .! .,· :· -·-·• ·" .,.1 • J_rjJ~rc;@'i,V8-·.¢9.ififfil!~.'i~J!~ll_(.7~.·-:: .. ,·.-------·. _ ,_~j;fi~_aI~rn.~_T!ITI.Qf~Y. ,j/1:?.i?o'Q~( , 0;50 Site Inspection Interactive Communications Cheat_um, Timothy . 1.1/17/2004 0.50 .)7rOJect, M.anage~.e:~-r;:_i~,;~ .~~.i. I.: , •. t), :ii.,;,i ~9u~~nty,.CO.r1fr<?(8~:vJ~.~.;i.::!~.~:.i::?,~,: ... :,. ,;,~, , •,):i).:~. ,'., ., . _,;,:.1.E.~gy;,gQ .. ~~.r:t .... .-.. ;.~ .. : .. ·:~.: 1.1!?~~9.Df .".,f)}.9 Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 11/23/2004 1.25 -~~~~~ste8~i~~e,it,e~"t" :• "•> ·;·:~ ••• ·:::. g-~t·~~·~·:·t'!!!~:··~l8J8~t!~,i~·ii~~: ~.-:.-· ~;,6~3:~it~r;r~it:h'Y" H~l~~~~gt ~J8 _$li~"lf!~P·~~i,6~'1?., .· ,I';. ~:·$p~g@~Mij6.fi~9ic1.n·~p~2fi.ofl,~f\ .. };:,) . .',_:' ·-·.¢ff8.afULTI., . .f!r~iClfhy=~:. ")',112°~20~ 0,.5_0 Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 11/24/2004 0.20 _' Si'tr{f~s·p_~Cfi'Orf ,.,.,~·: .. ; ···-· 1.... :.iijf~y_a~tiY8:t.Oflljpµ'~.·j~ti9J1.S'l 1'.i!'' 'i.'?t:t?\ /rrit·r::_·1'''',( ::cb~Bt~in;}ln.j~tfiY:,/ ··,_:::,:1](2~j2o_0_4-_.:.·. , i56 Si.te lnspecti_on Interactive Communications Sanders, James 11/24/2004 0.50 ···;·p·,:~j~.~·-~~~-~9~~86(' .... :. ,·,:.comITIU"rli6a"ffr)nSr:"ShiffC'OOrdi'ii'S'iiOri''t'. --Y. ',"''.]5'f.~'y',1V8ftt8Y T:1 '. 1·'Ff1'1~Q/299~,:·:·· '1f4o' Project Management comm·uriiC"afiOns··:··stSff c·oorct1natio-n ---· Pray, Jeffrey 11/30/2004 0.20 . .P.i.Oj~~ -~vf~ragf3.:in~hf ," :· .. , .. , '"~... ·;·t·9'i:if~_-u,i·i~_t'i9~ni:~Jj;i_jpt{O~!l.f: --. ,_ '_, ~i.:Er,~y·;i}~_(fr~{....... . .... _ f1{3~Q!260,(:. . j)JS Project Management Field Check Pray, Jeffrey . 11_/30/2004 0.20 f:roje.g M~-~agemenf .l. , .•••. ' Travel Time. .. -· ...... ·.·::· ... ~.-·,.. . . . F'r~l J~ffiey~ _ . )113Qi2004 .... _o)o Site Inspection Communications -Telephone Cheatum, Timothy 11/30/2004 0.25 I '-~ite_·I_DsR~cti~1:i'" : ,'.k ·,; -.;i,:.,.:.fn!~~~c;:t!Y~"¢?rnm~r,ic;:,~~\!?~.~ .... ~·:1,. . :.:.:.·~.tiE!~i~~. 1.t~9~6y"-·1_1@.9!?9.94 . . . o}o, Site Inspection Interactive Communications Cheatum, Timothy 11/30/2004 0.50 SiJ6_ lnSP8.ct_i,O~. I:·, ;r "ii .. t)rj{~r·a.~tiYBJ;Qrii.m~n,i~~f.lQr:if:.r::., S8nd_e~S.,A.8rTI.~s. ~.1@~91?_004' '' .. 9.5Q Site Inspection Plan Change Creation -Field Cheatum, Timothy 11/30/2004 1.00 : Pr6jB~t:_M_~n3g81'118.rit. . iit \¢:om.hi.~i]\Ca_t[~~.~?$.t~#.:¢9t)r~i"~~tl0.ri,'.,'.,\.. 1,; ,-· )~·fiY,~J~.~r,8y,::::~:_,. --.. 1.,,--:.i.?!1tioc}(~ .. Q)6 Site,rn.~pet:tion Interactive Communications Sanders, James 12/1/2004 0.50 ''.Pr6j8Ct·M8il8'98"m'8nP'.:· ":·~::,r. ..' .'r/j:_o·r,fmu·~[ca'tfohS:r_staff .. COOrd,.1r1iiH,On; . ~,,.,I. :'P.~S'y; J8ffrey .. i·--. ·-·"' .·J_21i(~00~ :. . o",~o Site Inspection Interactive Communications Cheatum, Timothy 12/2/2004 0.75 SitB_ !~SP~Ctiq~·· ,-~: '1".":,::.!iW~~.fiQ~tjOn'/trltOt~00~'11(1:>11 ' '.' Ch~_~fll_1TI::.Tiir{~\t,y !·. -~~12/?l~o'o'{ )'._oq· Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 12/2/2004 0.75 Sit~' lnsPElii_o_n' .. 1 " fotEir.~Cti:ve· GQ"_ffioiU'~'iijJi.Ons· 1 __ •• • -·_th~3tU.HCfi_lllOthy'·;l: .. , I °1"213J?o'Q~ ,"70·:50 Financial Guarantees Mana Financial Guarantees Mgt. & Mon <3.raves •. -~.tacy. _1 .. ~f?/2004. 1.00 .Project Management' -f'~imiti Plan Review . . . . . ' piaV:Jeffrey" 1217i2664 o:ifo Site Inspection Communications -Staff Coordination Townsend, Steven 12/7/2004 0.50 ' Sit,e' 1.n-SpE!Ction' ' ,.~.~~f~ct.\Y.~.:G.·~pf~ .. U.!Ji_~-~!~r.s. :, ·:.;_·~ .... ~-. ·,, c;.~~8-.t.~·m:J![l!Qlhy=:·_ -~-~.:· ·t~?20·94 ·1.Sd Page 4 of6 Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 12/7/2004 0.75 Jiite' 1.ri~p~etjion / :, '-' ·" ! l_rit~_ra·~:rYfc.~rijin~Q_icia!,[OhSi :;;;;,_·· :.: :i,: ,·., .,H.,; i ;, '·"' ,;,;, l, ·;::,c.~~-~tU.I].· Tt~:iOIOY .. '.:. }~~?904: .. ' tf5_o, Financial Guarantees Mana Financial Guarantees Receipt Graves, Stacy 12/13/2004 0.50 . i:>rOJe~ MB'ii_~g·~n:i·e~t ... ~ ~-~-'. ' ''c'On:i_rii.U~ri!~li9_iji~:~;t~f{g_O_~r~_irl8!!P.'~':· .1~'.-· -:-: ... Et8Y'J.8.ff!~Y ...... -~~_1Ji2POif ..... --· 0.30 Site Inspection Erosion Control Cheatum, Timothy 12/14/2004 0.75 : I. t -~Tt,e::J6!>P.:~-~!Oijr-:·-t ·.': ·:1r:a.Y.~fJfrl)~·.:.~.rt::i ;:i):1;L-·:: ·u· .dil.i . ' i ,,,;, ',i .. ··;;,-_9,ij~-~i~,JTI' ,)).m·gtbY:~: ;, "' ·.·.12/1~12004 .·. . ·o~ 7$' Site Inspection Interactive Communications Cheatum, Timothy 12/16/2004 0.50 , Si!elnSPectici_n )iavef,:ilne _ . ... .. .. .:re:·: , .:'.:c11~atur,j,:r)r.ii:_otby j?)f6Jl004 100, Financial Guarantees Mana Financial Guarantees Mgt. & Mon Graves, Stacy 12/20/2004 0.50 : .. i 1i?J!~}fh~Pirji~i~'.i'., : ;::::.;.~;\;~::.:'.i:::!i},,.'?.:i1 .. ·.:,I,;, ·r:Fti:~190J1S.fr~.~i~'J. '~Q~!~!~nc;:i:i<::;::.I.~;,·, :;, I,,;: ;t:.'. .. i::.::::~:.:~:'.'. :.G.~.!.!!~~r:n ;:J!rn.Q~hY .. '.: ·:;::·. j if?:?iiQ94 ..... ~·.}:,SQ Site Inspection Preconstruction Preparation Cheatum, Timothy 12/22/2004 0.75 ; Sijeinspectio.,i:: : .... ·.·· :' •. :: -:.: Jrave(tiine~:-:.::_·_~ ' •· . ~: C~eatum,JirrioJlly, _ 1y:!212j)04 Too Project Management Field Check Pray, Jeffrey 12/30/2004 0.25 ': 'I .. RtPj~~tM.~'~ii9'8ii:i.~rj.( ;J:5';} ::i:·;_:r;r!i i;::r;;;:::tlt~·~1 ":t.i/!i~:!f;;:i.li!j!;Lr:;:::;:j~,, ~,,,u ::.:;:,.:.i.i::iP:·i f; '.'.f. ipiB.f.'.J.~ffr~{.·:J·~::·,: ::::1.~1~9t?09i. :\·9:.4.Q. Site Inspection Clearing/Grading Inspections Cheatum, Timothy 1/11/2005 0.75 $i{~·1nsp89tJQ~;· -···_ u, ... ,; · .. n~.v~!.J.iin.e .·.--~~-~l·: .. :· . · -~.,~ .. :.: ... ..:.~: .. Gh.~~.tl:!m,Ii'!ls>_thy.· . 1/1.1·[?9_q5. ~~:fo9 Project Management Field Check Eddy, _Robert 1/18/2005 0.50 , i;iJ~roj8.C{~an.a~f8rri~iiT/!: iiI1·:,::,::r:::_·: ;::,:::,::J[~.V~ftfrll8 .. il?i 1tf:;.P!;!;i.'i::;:;;:r :::.:,:,1:.: ' ... :; '::;Ji::f'i·}·i·: \~;r::JJ~~y-;):{'Ofi~_a·?,~i ;iff8/2b:os-.. : : ,,.'.",:¢:.s.o: Site Inspection Investigation/ Enforcement Cheatum, Timothy 1/20/2005 1.00 . Sit~lnspeciicfn. :':Jray~l,Ii111e .~ '. •. :: .: . :.-.C.tieat~111/rimothy, 1/2J)/2_005 0.75. Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 1/25/2005 0.25 :"$i.tfii1Sii~·cti.O~.:::;:.rt1. J ('.\!'.{ rt: Ji : ·, :.;rf'.¢.9'.fDin:U.ii:fijl!~~·s.·1;;:·§:t~ff9:29.'&!!1~#9l:";J::i: l':.r ''.~.:3f'.~!_[th~jlf~:tn·,'fj"J!foifh'v,''' . :'.!Z(f{29Q~ . -···-·;·cf 56. Site Inspection -.·-·"'""" ~· _[),r~inagE:! & Utility Inspections Cheatum, Timothy 2/4/2005 3.00 Sitelnspectlo_n,:' C.:~:rr~v.eiJirn.e _ ... , . . . . ' t_ti~afii111, ti111oi11y ···. il4!_2oos ... O]S Site Inspection Review & Comments Cheatum, Timothy 2/10/2005 1.00 :1.:{sJtE(f6.~,p~4~~fri:'i\ ,·:,;;;'.5),1 !1:!i>:.·, .tiJ 1/. i;;'.~J.~[~~l.9~-.9.Cfrilf4!.1:'.::J?, ,:i:.:':'·' ·9h~·~tll.i!ff!!msithYi( .. :·. :.?.hJiiQQf'' J.09_ Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 2/11/2005 0.75 Si!~:1n~P86flQ~n · ·· :. , R.~:Vi_~~ .. &-Cg'!'m.ell)s · -·~·._q_h~at1.i'n,l, ·r11lJ9t_riY .... '.. 2i15J?00.5 o.'50 Site Inspection Erosion Control Cheatum, Timothy 2/1812005 0.75 1,1)site ·i.ri~P8'Cti·o~!':: ,Jray~1)'.illl~'.1 :1 :~··::::Ji:!:.\·;,T::.\i::\' , ,t:;;tt:1i:T ::; ·,·::·:.~: :?T?.¢H~·atµ·fu: Tt~'~t.Hy::· 211a,2005 o'.?.5 Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 2/25/2005 0.25 l'roject Maiiag~meni PemiiiTPlari Review· ,, . . ' ' ·Pray,)ef!i:ey. 3/1@05 .•.. ?,90 Project Management f:>~oject. M~nagerne.nt Fee .. ~~tim~ting Pray, Jeffrey 3/1/2005 0.75 Site Inspection ' ' . . o(ainage &'.(Jtii[ty l~spectio'ns' . '' '' 'Clleaiu111; Tiriioihy .. · • · 3/1/2005 1.00 Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 3/1/2005 0.75 FJ/lanciai -~-u~B.ra-Qt8.~s)..1B.~.~ }lri8~~C!~fGLl'iirante8s.· ~9( ... (~Qfl. . . .,. -»~··· -· -. .. . .. -.Gi.3.v_~-~::$!~1:Y .. _ .3_/?!iOQf 9)5 S_i_te Inspection Review & Comments Cheatu111, Timothy 3/2/2005 0.50 :· 'site', ln'SP8ct1on:·;· . '1Q_f~_irag~~~.·:~Jii)~'Y .Tr'~P.8~ifri.fjS;?(lJl''.:!::.?r.\)t_'.'1 i:."::~:/f;:·.9.~.~'.~fu'ri,.:_1,\_rj,j~t.by\ .. '.' ·:·'.::·~~i4l?@~· . ·:·:9).$ · Site' 1rlSpe'ciion Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 3/4/2005 0.75 , ~ite l_nspection . Qraj~age:~·uunty)iispection(, .·:.~ ... ttieiiiii_ri,, 1:;_riioihy ,. . • 3t!i/2o(f5 . 0,75 Site Inspection Road Inspections Cheatum, Timothy 3/8/2005 2.00 ~". S!t8"!ri.~P.8(;!,i_OB'" 't't'ti[:;'""'. '''; Jf8Yij!:r1!}1ij'::·· r' ;."' 1 ,, • • ~ ~j~hJi~)Ufff,'.f.i[TI5)!hY.'2' ·:. ~~~)!.~/.2.005.'"''.I' -.. ~~r75 Site Inspection Road Inspections Cheatum, Timothy 3/9/2005 1.50 · $it~-.i_~~P~C.li.?'~. --.Jf_c_~y~iJ::lrri~ .... -~-···:.=::·~--· : .. :c :.i.: ... : .:: .... 1, .•.• 1:.1.:, ·chl!8fiJ·n,.-tfnicithy' 3i9/2oo5 ··-""6_.7?. Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination ··pray:· Je.ffr8}''. -· . . .. 3/fof2o05' 0.70 ". $II~, 1~'j'~~~i<?h::". 1 ........... , , : ·.$!~ii9ijJ;.O,~{fOC; '":ri· ,,.~r.t:·.c.b~.afUfu~· tifi,-~t~Y 3/1. 1~o_o_!L ... f.09 Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 3/11/2005 0.75 _Sii,~ Inspection' " 'i:>r?inageJ Viilitylisp~~iioris:, '.: 9iieaturii, Tirn..i,\t,y ,. ., 3/f_azioo5 j 50 Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, TimothX 3/18/2005 0.75 .. , Site fr1SP0cil0i ''.','.~bf8.'i~'SQ'8:.8;rqrn1tyJ.riS'P'8CiiO~S).1 "' "''' 1 • .. •• ''\:;:·;~chijSt~ll,',Jiriioj~y.''' .. -·.· j~_Si2_'ti05 '_ '0)5 Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 3/25/2005 0.75 Sit~'lr\spectioii' '' i. ,p/ainage:&W)ilif/,l~~peclions' , ' ctieaiu'iii,Tir,:,qthy ~/2~/209~ 1.QO Site Inspection Erosion Control (;heaturr1i Timothy 3/2912005 0.75 Sit~:i_~·spect)~ri.".· ''/ff~V~(Tirri_8~.... . T. ·.c.6~atU'il1, Timot.~y ~ . .., '3/?:9t2oQ~·. ·o.75 Site Inspection Drainage & Utility Inspections Cheatum, Timothy 3/30/2005 0. 75 .SlteJiisP.8.cHOii .. Tr.aVS(Jii:i}_e· :. . . .. .. . .... ;_.... .:~,H ... ·;r·· ¢h.8,13tU.lli,';',Tiiri.OttiY .~/36i2o05 .0..7'.5 Wetland Review Permit/ Plan Review Gillen, Nick 3/30/2005 1.00 PtOjB'CfMSnil'Q'~i,ie~f. ·.;;-i: 'r-'"cOfnrrilJiiic'aliOiiS ::.S't8ffC·o·o'rd10StiO·n" "_''. 1.'. ~fB}i;)~ff~~y"".. . .. ~1~·1q.99f 0:29 Site Inspection COmlTIUnicatiolls' ~-Staff COOrdin3tiOii Cheatum, Timothy 3/31/2005 0.50 Siie Inspection ·:.c:.oni_mu_n_icatio~s.' St~ff <;p~r.d.in.~tjci_ff: , . ... . <;hea"iurri, Jiiii.iiihy , )/31i?Q05 Q 25 Site Inspection Drainag.e &.U.tili.ty Inspections. Cheatum, Timothy 3/31/2005 1.25 Sit8'J1JSP_8C.u6'ii r· ~··, ('e1an_·c_rya_~ge·.cr~.~-tib'n -'.~i&!d .. ., 1 Ch8~tum; !JniO't~l-3/:H/2·005 1,00 Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 3/31/2005 0.75 .~ite' lrl~P.~~19~·· . ·r.r_~~e)J:Jffi8 ... ,'i ./:': .. '.'.: <;: ... : . .'.'..'. :::.,~b~~J~.~.~'TJ.'AC)J~y . }(3,'1!~99.~ ... .Q:?.9 Wetland Review Permit/ Plan Review Gillen, Nick 3/31/2005 1.50 Site lrisJiedion:· , .. ,. •' ..•.• f{o~4Jn~pei:tfiiii(: ': ::··. _-,-, ..•... Ctie;i_tum, Timothy ~/1.?/2005 . • · .. · 2}~ Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 4/12/2005 0.75 Pf'oJeC:t MSnaQement , 11 • ·c,0'.r!ll!\~.tj,i~ti9ri§'.;;,$JS,f(C.Q()idirl8t!9·n··:, .... R.~8Y,).e.rtr8Y~:·:· -. · .. :4tf 3.i2.9.05, OJO Project Management Field Check Pray, Jeffrey 4/13/2005 0.25 .. P'!)ject Management · . 'riaveitinie. ·.. . i~. ,·. . ........ ·.:\ f'r~y. )effrey :. . . 4/1~12095_ 0:25 Site Inspection -·. Road inspections Cheatum, Timothy 4/21/2005 :.i ... sife:1.r:i_sP.e.ctiO~n, :: .:::;:riaY~.l:Ti.ITl~ .. ::1·,::"'.;:;;r.::,,'.: ..... :.;,.., .. ~ .. , 1'.;'.::I::·'.·:·-.-·::·.:1 .. :.u' .. ~. :.!.c~88(UITl,J.iIT.'~t-~y .: : ...... , .. 412Y?PQ5., .... · Site l~spe~~C?n q_or,:i!!:l~nications.,.s.taff Coordi~~-tlo~ .. ~. C~ 1 E3atum,.Tim.othy .. 5/5/2005 2.25 .:0-75 0.50 Page 5 of6 .:s_l~~: r~.~P.~~(!0/1 ''(: : ,,I '.t:.'..!:[''.r'.!.¢.0.ri\11,'ij~j~~fL~5~1:§t~fL9'i?§~i~:~u.Q:ff~::i:;:,jt'.Ti:I }L'.'~E'.;:!!'96~:~!~fl'.f,)Ji!,O!~V: :·:,:·. ::::Js[~i?PQ~.· ' ve' :i ·::·1 ;qq Site Inspection Drainage & Utility Inspections Cheatum, Timothy 5/6/2005 3.00 .. S.iteliispectii>ii ... i>ijnctil!siinsii~~ti,o~s'"···_ :: ''':\vi~:si~n~y -•. . 5/6/2005. 2~~ Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 5/6/2005 0. 75 : S)teJnspec:t(o~ , Ji~v~ftiriie .. , • '.;,-• . , ' d ~yorjs,·s_i~ney . ·. $i6i?QQ5 0.7'.5 Site Inspection Communications Staff Coordination~ Cheatum, Timothy 5/11/2005 0.50 Site lnsl)ectioh_ .... Filei.Jpdates::'.: ... : , . . ' ., ' . CJi,iaiuiii;Timc,thy:. . 5/1.1/2,005 ... 0.50 Site Inspection Review & Comments Cheatum, Timothy 5/11/2005 2.25 Site jnspeciion, , Drainag'e & Utiiiiy'lnspeciiqns Ci,~aiuin, timothy . 5/1V2005 2,00 Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 5/12/2005 0.75 site inspection . , ,, Road 1ns/>eciiiins; .. , . • c:~e~llim, Jirriotliy · s1131200s i5g Site Inspection Trav_el T_ime . . . . . Cheatum, Timothy 5/13/2005 0.75 ... st1.~· il1Sp:~ct)o0· , ··Re·v·ieYi'&'CorYiffi'8rltS':·· :9li_~~f~~.-JJili~ff6Y: ... ~ 5Htf2605. . 6i5Q Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 5/20/2005 0.40 Site [QSp~cticin . , Ri'i~flnspectlons.: :.: ::::..· • :~c~~aiuin, !!ino\~Y. • 5/20/2005 . . 6.06 Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 5/20/2005 0.75 :·1_p~Oj8,Ct:M~riij"i;j'8fn_8'rfr"; ·:":.c·om:m:t@C~ticiflS.{§f8!(¢:Q9i.~.ih.8t!Oi1 \·.·.u:;. .:;;_:pJaYrJ_e:ijr~rt· ... ,. ::,·.;ii:::s,~_M?9~Qf ;, _()'.,~fa, Site lnspecUon Special Meetings (Inspections) Cheatum, Timothy 5/24/2005 1.00 Site inspecjii,n Tra'i/ejtifiie. _ :. : ... '.'. ~ :. •·... ... .• • fheai~ryi, fini_ii(hy ,5124i~005 0]5 Site Inspection Special Meetings (Inspections) Cheatum, Timothy 5/25/2005 0.75 : sjf,rfo),p-~ciiQrl:: ·: ')~r~11~t:t:1iTl~ _ ... /'..: :::·ir \.::_ :_,_, _. . -t:bfic1JU_l]1_,_ji~-oihy. . -~5~_~1~095_· -. o.75 Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 6/1/2005 0.25 , ;·•''§ite 1ri'~i>~ctiori;,u :i' ... ' 1yi,. !§i5ai\ia1 rvi~~ti.b!lS:(1ii'siiectiOnsjJ'(I'···· · ::irucb~•tiiii'i;,:irnothY :.:,·: 6i,112oos··•.· ·.· :i:CJo Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 6/1/2005 0.75 . P.rojecif;ian~geri,e~t .. -.. communfcaiioiis : Staffcciorctinaiion· .. ··_ :J )'ray :)~fire{::.. . . 6{272965 . d.3ii Site Inspection Di-8iria·g·e· &'\Jti1lty" ln'SPeciiOns· ---"'" -Cheatum, Timothy 6/2/2005 4.00 Sit~ lnspeciiciD Tiay~)Tiin'e ,· . .,. ;c;~~aturn, Timothy 6/212005 0]!; Site Inspection Special Meetings (Inspections) Cheatum, Timothy 6/3/2005 3.00 . siie lnspeciforr 'i''' Tr~veii'irii~'i1 i 1;·1 ':'t.'.':).: :' '. .D:' .· !}c~a~iiim,'Timothy .. '.'.613i2005.. . b:75 Site Inspection Special Meetings (Inspections) Cheatum, Timothy 617/2005 0.75 __ SJie 1_n_~p'i,cil().f1. . fr~V8(:fim8 --~-~ .. ~~;-.·~: ... ,, ~.--Che·atu·n,;JJinOt_hy. :6tii2o05 . -~"if!S Site Inspection Special Meetings (Inspections) Cheatum, Timothy 6/8/2005 1.00 '~Jt.~.l~~p_e~ti~I}' :i.1,.:_Jg.1V~tJl.~~c.:' .. ,., ''"!:.:;·:···· , I 1: .... G.b~~I~l!!,iJimq1t,Y, ::-.s.1_~1,iqot .. ~· ;~ .... §.?.5 Site Inspection Bond Reduction Cheatum, Timothy 6/9/2005 2.25 -P(OJ~CfMa~n·age·m_eii_t 1·: ''.-~--• ·_::.':~¢9'!1'!1.~:·n:i~t10ns··~_-$·t_?ff_t·o·<,r.df~_at/Ory : r···ir~y~-'.~·ettrey--·· ,., .. , ~/1J}/?.695 . ~o:~5 Site Inspection Communications Staff Coordination -Cheatum, Timothy 6/10/2005 0.50 . Site 1n_SPeciion-· :bf8l~age--&. Ll_ii1_~Y:1ri~Pe_ctio.i1(-. . -c_h88tu~:.)\ffi0ihy_ Eu_i4~Qo5 2,75 Site Inspection Punchlist Inspections Lyons, Sidney 6/14/2005 2.00 :·!.$.il~._l~sP,~~FO~' ,. i,; : i .. : •• , rriV~i_Iim~~: i:., 1· . ' :.:·•·· ,... : '·I.. : I.: . •,1·:Gh~~·-Y.rr.:·1Ilm:9ibY: _... , .. J?it4/;z.oq§_,' ·_o/s. Site Inspection Travel Time Lyons, Sidney 6/14/2005 0.75 Sjte_tfl~pectjOn . ·sR8Cia0v18eHng·!d1llS'p8_Cfiol1S) ... --¢.h~~-t~n:,', Jlfl19fhy 6j1~/20Cf5-. 2'.·~.9. Site Inspection 'Tr8VelTi'rrie. . . . . .. Cheatum, Timothy 6/15/2005 0.75 Site lnspecifon Comniunicaiion; Staff C.oordi~aiioii -. . ': 'cneatum,"TilTlothy. : 6[2i7~d65 . o.so Site Inspection Communications Staff Coordination -Cheatum, Timothy 6/23/2005 0.25 Project Management[ ,, •. Coriirriuhica\icin(-i.taff C:oprolnation , P@',,J~ff!ey: .. . ,. J@/2Q05 ·. 0,25 Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 6/29/2005 0.75 Siie Inspection. . Interactive Communications Cheatum, Tiiii,otlly . ... .6/?9./?905 . ..1.2Q Site Inspection Communications Staff Coordination -Cheatum, Timothy 6/30/2005 0.25 : ·si_te 1riSP8cf!QD.-·.:.' .. ! ··-'fri)er'a'ci1Ve·c·ommiJ.riiCStloiiS -· -.~~-·,r::;:" ·-. _, : .. .,. t·68 .. ~iijfl1'.,Jfo}Oi_~y-.~-. _6~Q!~99~ ·-~ ··o/?5 Site Inspection Drainage & Utility Inspections Cheatum, Timothy 7/1/2005 3.25 '' ~llt-·\t:!~·t'~t}~~, Ti" ,-:';'.:_l]J¥ia"vt11~:li~·p·~.9,!Jt~'f::~:r:;,fIDt· :?c:;ri:::!.s: ,,~rX:;~;;:~ht~i~~·~i~~~i~y·_ ::·::i_:·~·::~~~·~~-~~f · ~i~- ::-~:_s_i_te ,.n~P~c.i!C?,-~ · · · · · · t·raver-t·ime·· · ·: .. :-·_-~-~: '.'_.······-.' ~: 1 :··, • ·.:-,_~ ~:-~:~ ~--:~'.~:=~LYO.~.s~),ia~ey __ -·-i1}1i695 ·o.5.o Site Inspection Communications -Telephone Pray, Jeffrey 7/6/2005 0.25 -. ,Sjte ini~cifo'riL. .-' /:··,~:O_rj_ifR.~~-~~i!9!f,'"''"'r· .,.. -r i . ."f>:r8YJ.~ff~~Y: ..... ,.. . 7_i]{i095. ·3.~·5 Site Inspection Field Check f)ray_, Jeffrey 7/7/2005 0.50 ·:sw~:·,~:~P.~:c;t1~6'..:·, ... , . 1::-'.1r.·;~i:1;'fr~ver:ri;:nEr .. 1·r 1:';: ,:;":: '.·;:ttn,-!'tT::'~·nP:,T: ;:.'!_·::'.::::-rr·:!'.[·::\ :: 'tr~·y,i~Q~ff[~f' ....... T,., ··,::ttl!~:9:qs· · ··:·o.s·o· Financial Guarantees Mana .. ·"· •-Fina'l1Ci81 'fau'a'i-il1te·e·; ·Mgt:·a· M·on Graves, Stacy 7/8/2005 "-1 ·.oo ; Site 1nsP~-¢.fiQri ---· ::-: .. ~QD.(~jd~¢i9_~_:·-=-~~:· __ : ~,:: :::.:: .. ~~. :·:,.,~rav·.~J8f(r.~i:-· -~· ·1,~i20Q5 6.60 Site Inspection Financial Guarantees Enforcement Miller, Raymond 7/12/2005 0.75 f;;rj~nCi81;G_1.i'a"ra_riteEl~·:_M8ri8; -; \fl~~·i~~_i~I. ~-~a."r8.r1i~ef~9(§i .fy10r( 1, . .-.~'.r~\'..8S;~~t~'Cf ... . . J:(1~/~0.0fj .0._?5 Financial Guarantees Mana Financia_l_ c;uarante:es Receipt ... ,,. 1 T"" _ Graves, Stacy 7/14/2005 0.50 site fosiieciion ······ . ,·';,uii6iiiist'1iisiieciions '·· ··· c:~e.:i~rri.Jtrn.<itfiy:: :a7~12qo.5 .Loo Site Inspection . Punchllst Inspections Lyons, Sidney 8/5/2005 0.50 Site lnspectii,n Punchiisf lnspeciions ~-_Lyons,.SidrieT • . 8/5f?Q05. 0:50 Site Inspection . Trave1 .Tirrie . . -·· Cheatum, Timothy 8/5/2005 1.00 ,:·_s_it~ .!_ii'speqfi0/1 ·: 1.)'_rijVi(ti~8 ._;_-;;:;Y:.L/C.''' .. : .. , .. 1 ,.'. ••• tY.Q6('$i_~n~Y.~~::; ; · ·.~i5/~QQ$. · .. cf59 Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 8/12/2005 0.25 ·si~e 1l1SP8cti(?n',.''. ...... , ... -~··" ... , .. :)~_U_ri_CbJJ.~T'fifSP8C.ti_QR[."~~:~.~~:~~-j 1:~· 1 • ·:~:; ~--:~_::·· ···::·:~i'.~:.:~G.~e~fiiiri;-Tin{OthY:·~ .... · )3/f:ii?°O~ff ..... 3_:oo Site Inspection Travel Time . Cheatum, Timothy 8/12/2005 0.75 .. Project ~a_ri~Qem~nt _ GOiiffTI~nj~tiOii~ =-:s.t~f!.COOf~iP~ti-~ff.:, L.. -~ _-;·_p!~Y, .J~~!efY __ :~-·-8/1 Bf.?005 _0;1_0 Project Mc1n_j;lg_ement Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 8/19/2005 0.25 Si_te.lri~p_ij~i9n:.i'\i' ' I, ·: ./·:.·)'f'U:~.c.~.l(~tei~P~!~#ifo\fi~l~'.i:,j'::.: --,· i ·-.. :·1< 'J5H1:t~i~!TI;'!tfrffOfhY.:· ~~:"·,:.·:a~~/~opit ·0.75 . . Page 6 of6 Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 8/23/2005 0.75 Pr0j8~t M_ary~geiji8rl(::·-;_~ "· :· .:~co:mrij~!it~tiOf1:S-~~$i~-tfG:~.<>rd.l!i_~t_i~n .. :· •••' _ '····--~-;::e~:i:J~f(riY.--·. " ..... , 9/29i20()5 _-· -.. OAQ Site Inspection Punchlist Inspections Cheatum, Timothy 9/29/2005 1.50 Site Inspection. :LPu~cbl~fp/ep~rajion :Ff~ld ._··,·:t~': ·::-c;li_e,itii_m,1ti,i,9Jiiy -9/29/2005 .. _4.00. Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 9/29/2005 0.75 Project ~anagement -' --~~ Q~a,i)tyC:ontroi,R~v!~\Y . _ __ '.'.. : __ P[BY,J!'ff!ey . • 9f.i0/2005 . -0~~9 Site Inspection Punchlist Preparation -Field Cheatum, Timothy 9/30/2005 2.75 ·:: FJ[l~n.c:\c!i ~g~~~S.hte.~·~· M~6~::: , J::rQ~~§i_~g°;Q~~!fi~t~fO(j~~gfa.:n~-~-:·:-: :-:.-~~r.ii~i.f §j9~~{ -~-~.-:. _fo@~2_9of--··c(4·o Project Management Permit/ Plan Review Pray, Jeffrey 10/5/2005 0.20 Site lnspe'c:tion ' ... ' . ~piicial Meetings (fnspectioiisj'. ' ' '' . .. "'c:li_eatuiii;Jiiiiothy .. 167512005. . .• J. ob Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum.Timothy 10/5/2005 0.75 Site'lnspeciion', : /F'u~ctilistf'ie~~r~iioiF Fl~ii:IJi 1 •• i 'Cheatum: TirifoitiY jo!)11266s ' 9.56 Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination ~rayi .~effr~Y 10/12/2005 0.70 ·:'.B{Oj8:§t.M~:n.ag·~rn:enf '' I ',LJ: ;cp:~'.~J'.ij8)'ity;¢Qh(r;:i).i8.~Yi~W~'.!:::'.;:;·:.1::: ::i;::JT:::'.:•; :::l:fiiLb 1>i r;· i iei:~Y{:~.~~[~Y . :.·:.!'.}Q!}?/~QQ:$:' ::·)t50 Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 10/13/2005 0.40 1 '"'S"fte )'~~P8Ci(o~::::':: .. $P~:cr~c~·~-~:~iij9f((n#i8~j9A~('::·,.. ._J;~·ff~.~tij!TI;Jiffi'.o"ifo': .. :·.: JJ~!?.90Jf . ').f~ Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 11/2/2005 0.75 'site 1nspediori , 1 corieiiiionderice'·" .,_ ... ,: , ... · ch°eaturii,;tiiiii>iliy 1)1.i,2oos o:so Project Management Communications· Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 11/17/2005 0.10 : §ite _lnsp8~H_prl." . < .. 1 )3~~·ea_rshLi. ., .. ·. : .. /; ..... : ·. _ 9.he.~turrf: T_i'!i"Ot~y .t11~1i2oq~ :P}~ Site Inspection communications Staff Coordination -Cheatum, Timothy 12n12oos a.so Pioje.d fyf~ri3gern_E!ii_t. 1 ·-,-. ---~~¢0f.n~~rrlC8til;>~~-=-stj# .. 9·~·o_,:ctl~atiQQ ...... -, ,~ .. .; _ p~~y ,:Jeffrey . 1°2(9/2005. . o.10 Site Inspection Communications Staff Coordination -Cheatum, Timothy 12/9/2005 0.25 Site_lnspe~iori. -~Research ... " .... , 'tlieaium, Timoihy 12/912005 1.25 Site Inspection Research Cheatum, Timothy 12/9/2005 0.75 . ~ite ln_sp_ectiOn 9.~fu~~ll!cati_OnS.?j~Jfc·oo·f91i,8~j~ii. :, ._:J;,.Q~~J~.~~-.:D.~~tliy. 1?1.141?99~. . : 9-:~~ Site Inspection Communications Staff Coordination -Cheatum, Timothy 12/14/2005 0.25 Site 1rspe'ction · S~eci~IMe'eiings(lnspe¢ioris), . _79ti~aJuni, fiiiiothy ·: .. 1?/)?12005_ -:i:oo S_ite_ l_n~p_ection ,, ,_, .. ,,,,,,._ Travel Time Ch~atu_n,, T_imothy . ___ 1 ~!1 ~12gq~ 0.75 s_ite. ·1_ns,pe:ct1~if ··· · 1 ·, l:t [¢_C?rn:mtii:iJ:~8Ji0:6~ .. §Ja:~i¢~~[~i0.'.iji!grr· 1\i i::-;: :·G_h~~~-ijm_·.Ji_~OthY 1:::·.:.1.::'. .. J:~1?:orio.05 : ..if15 Site Inspection Investigation/ Enforcement Thinley, Tenzing .. .. H17/2006 2.00 ,: : .§h-~'.,jH~P~:~J~/1:JI,: .. ':-:-:-,:-:--:-,::-:-::-'::-,,.n-:-.:-.n::-::-:rrr~Y~i.:I)ffi~'.:::J:'.:i::!;r;'.;_-:: :n:.:;::\1 [jf;::: ,·:::··::1:'i" i?l:;::rH: :·'.-;/:tb)~l~Y:.:t~~iI69::: :·: '.i'.r::.::f,Jt./.?.0..9f. '.;·:r;;:cr§:q Site Inspection Investigation/ Enforcement Cheatum, Timothy 1/19/2006 2.50 ., .. :~l!~'.i.~·sp~a,o:ij''.•:;::::;;~ 1·11·:' r:;~:tf8'.¥'i( Iin:i~::1:::.:.:.'I[i.'~::'.:::·iJ::-u:;:J::i} !T:'IT'' r,,·I ':::![c{ij~3jU?1f,itlrT\9t~Y'::::?t1 : 1;::)~f9j260:S.::, .. , , .. :-: cf7,s Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 1/20/2006 0.20 .. , :_~ij8"1rlji~~~1_0~-:_:;: ::::-i; :::::·c;·9_nj'm_u:~i(~ti_Ori~ ~:t~ff G2Sffij_iri~ifo_DX'.'.\ ': Chea"tum;J1nlOthY~'-_ -·. 1/20/2006 ·:· .. 2:qo Site Inspection Research Cheatum, Timothy 1/20/2006 1.00 Projei:! Man,ageme_rif i c:;~iiiiji_ijiiig,Jiiins:telel'_h!)!l• ;· ''.' •·· ..... ;: ·;: ~riiY:'.Jiffiiiy ..• '' . . iii{12QQ~ ....•.. j}o Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 1/25/2006 0.60 -~_ite 1nspe~ctiOn.. , -. ._.11'.'i~i~~~8GQinrr.i~~!.6-a.tl(?O~'.~ ... -:~-:~·:::~::::~ :::~:-: : ..... :.· :: · _.Cb~~Ju_~_._.Ti111othy ..... __ .'.1.~§/~Q06_ ..:0-.~.Q Site Inspection Communications Staff Coordination -Cheatum, Timothy 2/14/2006 0.50 ! . Si,e tr1.sP8d_ion.: :~·:~; :.¢Q.Ql.!11Uril_citj9~:s ."Si_!lff .9-Q.~~1ri.~tJ9 .. ll= ~::::.": ~: =· ~. -: : ;··cn~arum; Tiin'OH,y _ .. ,-·· -.. ~·2ti 6i2bb6.. .o. 7_5 Site Inspection Communications Staff Coordination-Cheatum, Timothy 2/17/2006 1.50 Site Inspection, , .. YR~se.arc~ ·:: ......• -~···· .... :•-.,, ... --. -Ch~~tuiri,.fimi:ithy . "2{1712006 . Z:6Q Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 2/22/2006 0.20 --P-roj~:CfM1;1QaQe·n:i.Em't '' ::.:.¢9~~~:U,n)c~~YDb.s .. ~-~i~f(~~~:r~(ii_~ti~:n:. ·<> .. ) • --·-, .. P~~Y~]~ftr~Y._.' .. .,_. ...J/~~/2.QQ~. . ~6.}Q Site Inspection Interactive Communications Cheatum,_ Timothy 2/23/_20_06_ 0.25 :Prc;,Je~:.M~n·ag·eme~.c· .. :/ ·;-, , :h ,::-:gqn,:11JIJ6J:Ccl~IQ~S -~:t~!~·P:ti~-~~'.: :-· ··~:Pfiy·.~J .. ~ffr.8Y.: .. :; .• . . ·)12!.~Pc>,6:.. · ·o.~6 Proj~ct Managemen_t Permit/ Plan Review Pray, Jeffrey 3/8/2006 0.10 , ;,;. Sife.1_!1SP'.8ciiO_n:.: ,., ''"' '"'"' 'i 1Ht8/~giiY~ .. c:o:1T1in-~".fC_8.HO~~Jit· ·_ph~8fU_ri,/1irrl:ofhY. :·-.... ~.~r"3(9/iO~Q6 , ·ci'.·~o: Project_Mana_ge_r11ent Communications-Telephone Pray, Jeffrey 4/27/2006 1.20 ·",· .Pf_OjeiC:f'M.~n:~fi~.rn-~n.t:·::;1'. 1.,s: ,., :cQii,initfoi_¢8.!H~ri.(~-'.~:i~tf '.Qc,'cirdJ!:!8iJ.CJr1 :.:· P,f2y ;;:J~t.fef:_;_·. ··1 .' ·: i: :.'.:~~1_7(?06~ o_}S Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 5/18/2006 0.10 '~rOj8{;t't~fci~:ag~·r!)e:n.t:.:: .:ti<?:rriiW~n'i~,!O~S :~)j[f9:9'.~i~!ri~ff9'.~~:·,"-~'" -~i~y·.::~&ffr~Y · , .$7io'i26o6'.. }.QC) ProjectManagement Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 6/21/2006 0.75 . PrOj8d M8rl'Sge·men1· :·_9Ua{itY c:o~trOf't~8Vi~\iV:.·:~::· 1··.. ;i .:::-~· ·e_d~Yi){i:¥8ff:,:. . .. 6726/2006 .... '.Cfs·p Project Management Permit/ Plan Review Pray, Jeffrey 6/29/2006 0.10 Er'!gin88ri~g· R8\li_8w · · .. P.efrinl(J P.1~·n-R8Vi8~i ... :. ,, :· _:;. ~~.ici~; :.M.i~~e1. 7(28/2006 1.00 Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Townsend, Steven 7/31/2006 1.00 Total Hours Worked: 244.20 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055· 1219 Project Name: NICHOLS PLACE L03P0015 Project Location: NICHOLS, MARK & BARBARA 13815160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 Project Management Statement Statement Date: 8/9/2006 Customer: Penni!#: L04SR034 Project#: L03P0015 Parcel Number: 1423059058 Penni! Type: SITEREV Status: COMPLETE Page 1 of 4 Project Management Statement Managed Project Hours Budget: Total Hours Worked (see Hours Detail): Total Budgeted Hours Remaining: Fixed Fees: Dcescript 5 iC?n ... . ... ounter ervice Fees Total Fixed Fees: Managed Project Hours Budget: 'To.ta.1.Managed.Proje<::\ Bu~get: .... Total Amo~rit D~ferted: · · AMC>UNT:DUI;: AT APPill9ATION! i Amount Under Budget: Pa ments: Date Posted 6/25/2004 . 6/25/200•!' . 7/15/2004 . 6/27/2005 7/22/2005 ' 8/1/2005'' . Total Payments Received: ,Total Balance: Amount . $205:20 $205.28 $22,314.60 $22,519;88 , ! IJ'. >; ; , .. ' , :,I.>,; ' .. $0:00 , .. < ' Deferred $0.00 $0.00 i,I, 154.00 134.45 19.55 Due Now $205.28 $205.28 $22,314.60 . ,, $22,519.81/' ,:· . ' ($2,832.77) ($19,687.11) $0.00i Page 2 of 4 Disclaimer Language for Permits under Project Management Based on permit information submitted by the applicant, the Department of Development and Environmental Services has determined the amount of review fees for the subject application. The fees shown do not include ancillary permit fees, project-related mitigation fees, or any other fees that are passed through to the applicant from other agencies or as part of the project's environmental review. Fee estimates are based on information submitted to ODES by the applicant prior to finalization of the permit application. In addition, estimates are determined by utilizing historical data gathered from projects of similar type, size, and scope. DDES's fee estimate Is subject to revision under conditions including, but not limited to, the following: 1) Unknown or undisclosed site or project Issues · 2) Changes in the project 3) Incomplete information from applicant 4) Errors in applicant information or submittal 5) County code fee changes 6) Appeals Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. For billing questions, please call 206-296-6659 Page 3 of4 Permit Number: L04SR034 Statement Date: 8/9/2006 Hours Detail Function Task Name Workdate Hours ')~foj~~LM~~i9~~in·~.nt J:'.8.rffif(J:'.1.cin)~·eyi.~w. . I .. ,' . • ' L ':"J?Y~Ja:m~s.': "-6(2,91~901_' ~ .. 00 Project Management Permit/ Plan Review Dye, James 7/1/2004 1.00 projei:fMsnag~rneiiC . ::.. . l'fcijeci Maii~g~nj'~~tf,i~c[:~ifm~iing .·. :;_sa~de:~;)~r:i!is 7/)/~Q01 ·.... O'.??. ~ngineering Review Permit I Plan Review ViJong, Wylie 7/14/2004 1.00 Project).ia_nagemenf : •. :· Peimtt/Plan:Revlew. ,Dye, Janies.. 111412604 ci:ts Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 7/23/2004 3.00 ·engiiuieri_ijg' R~Vi~~ P.erfii.i~ / fl.I~,,: ~~.~i-~~: . . .... L .• L ..... ·:·wo·ng·;:Wylie.--_ . . . 7/~-B/_?00_4 _ 0.40 Engineering _Revieyt Permit I Plan Review Wong, Wylie 8/3/2004 1.50 Engineering Rev_iiiw .•. ..:.P~l'!Tli! /Pl~n BevJew_ • --·-·-.... . .... c · '.' ~: : \.Y9_1!g, V\lylj<, • 8/11/2004 1.00 Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 8/20/2004 1.50 . _l'roject fiianagO:ineiii: .Pe_miiiiPlaii Riview . • . ...... · _;, -· •. ,, '.,:; ___ Dye; Jan,es 8i~0/2004 ci.50 Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 9/20/2004 2.50 Engihe~r(ng R~yi~-"' _ . Permif/.~~n !3eyiew: • .:';; -~~·::'o'Joiig;'Jl{ylie . 9/21/20.04 . _f59 Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 9/28/2004 1.50 Er1gl~_ie:rjDg)~~y!e~.: ·-pe/init (P.ISQ~R.E!VieV(·:· ":-'. ... -" ,.. '"W~n·g, WYli.E! ··-_ .. -~JOljgQo4_ .. 2. . .oQ Engineering Review Meetings Wong, Wylie 10/5/2004 1.50 __ -Eiigirl8_ejirig RtiVl8_W .Qll_Suty 9·o·~tt~f Rii\l.!~yj ~ .. ··----,-,--,-.=:, -~{Srld_eys"; __ Ja·m-es _ ··1Qi5/26o~_. o.50 · Project Management Permit/ Plan Review Dye, James 10/5/2004 0. 75 . :J;~gil'!e~!!rj9J:~-~Yi~w __ ·:::. . .. _ P~i}nit'i~la~,.~~V!~~. ~9ff9,\~'Y.1!~. _ 10[~/:?0Q{ 0.80 Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 10/15/2004 4.00 . Engineering Rev_iev/ Permit /,Plan Review Wong, 'Jl{ylie .·· ·1012512604. 1.00 E_ngineering _R_eview Field Check Wong, Wylie 10/28/2004 3.00 E_ngil1e~ri~g-~_8Yi_8_w'.:: . ·: : .. :.:.P.~miit/PiBrd~-~xi8~t::: .,.. . ._. l i. :: jiyO~g::v&:i!~ '"" )01i~'!200~'._". "2.00 Engineering Rev_i_ew Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 10/29/2004 0.90 :?:.E..09!rie8.~i_rjg -~-~~i.iW_;~ ;I,· ;j::_: '..~:;:::::::::::::::.:P.~~!hiQ[~i~fi:R~Yt~~ :--:_::_-:J:r:1;:; )~~O~s.:WY1!~'.:!::::i~'. :T: ... ~ .. --'io',i~/2CfO:,r···::_:~·-:_ :_3.ld' Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 11/1/2004 2.30 ~-~girl~~dD9 .rre:y_(ew: _ .! i:;.h, L,/! .. !.e~?iHJ.t..1ie1~bJ~_~y;~;v; J;' {HT1UT: !.iWPHtJTWY!l~~:i?'.: ::~e:.~;,:: :1J!il~Q6f:i ;:(:'.'.:))o Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 11/2/2004 1.40 i"' ij~'ri'girj~~~(69J{~:VtijiN:;;J::;'::!'1'.flliinT:?·;::1?JiF.?,~iinif/!P!8".iR~Y!~Y':r1 Tl': r ( ':''' t)r~,-.. ,J: {:\1&;:;1 ,1EWQ.6(f,LWYtl_~·::::::, \"ir:1:J_1~~~-o:o{L?::!)(§o' E~g)n~eri~g .. ~eview .. . Permit/ Plan_ Review Wong, __ \/_Jy_li_e 11/3/2004 1.60 ~rg!!l_~~J,n,g J{iYi~.w::?!::.:T'.I .tr:J:1!:r:~e~r.mwre:,~~::R~Yi~~::~·'.r!. , :"i.\~qag',::W@.~:::;::,::::::· . -: r11~1.?.Qo"f. ·ii, ?:9o Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 11/5/2004 3.00 . ··_~Bgl_ll~8H6~iJ{~Y(~Vii: ::!: . :·i !.'.::!:·::·· ,::_~~miI(!...P,l~ri}~BY!~W.. : ,.I :VYC>hg',jyYilf;:,, :U/8/io'Cf{ . \QO Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 12/15/2004 1.50 · Eriain.••ringfia:;:iaw 1: · ••• < • Pe\mif/P1aii13eview .. • ,w2n.g, V\lyli~ · 121.rn2004 · 1.oq Engineering_Review . .. Field Check \/!Jong, Wy_lie 12/28/2004 2.00 .-~ngfo8~_r!hg:f{~-Vi~~ ' .. ~ ·--·-·:·::"})~.t~T(l)~.1~~~··'3eY!~~r:· ,.,., -r::)YQ~g~_\,yyl}~-~ '-~_1/~1~Q9$' o.80 Project Management Permit/ Plan Review Dye, James 1/20/2005 0.50 · en,Qi_n~~r1ng:i:~~"'.i~~ ::: . ···; :·-.... :ope·rmif'I P1a~~J~~.Y.iew····· --:"1 •• ,, • "" , •• yv9.r1g·;:vvYu~. _. -· --1f?~i29·9-1t .: ·2.00 Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 1/27/2005 1.50 , Engineering Review "fierniff/Pi~nRi,:viey; ' ' Wong; itiiy'iie ~-2i1i?005. 2 50. Engineering Review Permit I Plan Review Wong, Wylie 2/18/2005 1.00 · El1gin88rlrlg R8Vi8W .. ·:~ . -~8rrnifi P1an·R8Vie'W: ....... -..... . ··:wOrig,)ivy.il8 -: 3/'1i2005 ·:.rso Engineering Review Permit I Plan Review Wong, Wylie 3/9/2005 2.00 ·-_E~gine~r1~9 -~e~i.~w: , :~-· ·. Pe·r.mift ~iai\. RijVi6!"' ---·. --· · t ·• ... ~--·• · ·• , •.•• ~~~-wl?fig: .WYu,(~ ·.3/1512005 _ 2.20 Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 3/16/2005 2.50 Engineering Review ~ ~ermit/.PJan)~e.view . . Y\'Qng,_Wylie. 3i16f2005 1 :oo Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 3/17/2005 3.20 Engineering:Review ·-teimit/f:lariReview·' ...... ,. ,W,oi,g, itiiyiie. 3/18/2005 1.70 Engineering Review Permit I Plan Review Wong, Wylie 3/18/2005 3.00 . Engineering R.eview . pen,, if/ f'1~6 _Fle_vi~\v .. .. ....... ;-: ----.. ,_. :· _ Wong,\Wlie -3/21/2005 3)o Engineering Review Permit I Plan Review Wong, Wylie 3/22/2005 3.00 Erigi1_1Eiering Revi8w ... :· ,. _ .. PE!~ii i Pi'8n· ReVi&W f'.. . :~yi/9.~g~_'!Y}'He 3/~~2005 1 }O Land Use Applications Rev Permit I Plan Review Dehkordi-Westerlun 3/23/2005 0.50 · _ Land;4Se APP1iC8ti~ris R~V .. . perm_it_l ~Ian_ R8y_ie_w _ R.~b:~Ordi~We_St8r_iUn .. . 3124(2_0_65 2.50 Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 3/25/2005 0.70 ·J;iigih~~f.L~iR.8..~i~W .. ·,: P8rnjif/ _P!clri R~Y,1ew: . " ... vyo~ilg, yvyn~ ~/30f2°0P_? ~_.50 Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 4/4/2005 3.00 l 'Ellgi~Eler!119)~8~i8w.~:, ··_.~:: ;;~~:.:~e~ffiitt:e·ia.~:.8~V-!ivi~. , , , ··t' ·····;r• i !-~iLWollg:·:WYnet :·•"'' '4/6/2005_ --_ -'~-.i .50 Engineering Review Field Check Wong, Wylie 4/11/2005 1.20 ::~· .. ~nQi~Ei~H~g °f{iY(~w:·· .1.. ..::~: ::;;c:P,efniiQ:e1aRJ~e_Vi8W . .,,. !"~ ·"' r., .,, :.t .. ·! '. :.·4 .• ~'1: .. .1.,)::·~::ti:WP!.19:·:WYii_~::::~:·:·~ 4/j~j/2.0.05 ·o!s.o Engineering Revi_ew_ Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 4/28/2005 1.30 ;_~~gf~:~~·~'i,iig'_8~.Yi,8\\f,i?i} r:r:r:::·.]::::::::::,::'.:TPM~f!nKl::&T~ff:8~~:y1_e~,~~:i[:;:'::'.i: '.;'.:l'.C:i")!' ,-,:iLL::t:n.! :r~?Y5i~g'/i.WYti.~'..i.':i,~.::1.r ::::1:~?~~'?79.Q§:::.~:· .. ~ ·:: .. f}9 Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 5/2/2005 2.80 Jfigi_~efr(ng'_R~.Y.!eY'./ :;: ' : 'l.':':1:\;JI8~f.[l'f(fl~!~.~~J~Y!~V;r:;:::_;:,;:1 r)~{o:ij·g·;!~6'Y'Oi::::.~::·.:·:\: ··,::·~·_\$?~/~PO( -: 1.00 Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 5/3/2005 2.00 : :?E.ngilleer,ng!~e:vi_eW.!,iYr:: .... Pi.~rmH·11Jt1.a:b'_R~·yJ~:~r;·q1:1.1 '?,::·r::1 I ·:<'..11) i :tyvo:ij'Q}YWu~.L-·:::... :w: ···;·;::~;s1zo.os1::. :::.~::J_::oo ~_ngineeri~g Revie!W_ Permit/ Plan Review ViJong, Y'Jyl_i_e 5/10/2005 1.00 ',L8n~1QSe Ain:ffi68_tf0l1S 'RSV JTi,:::·· •·;··:.-: ~~{@~/j~:[El~):i~·y'ie_;'.:_:;:·:"' : ,/ 1:: ':P~.h~t:>i~J~w~:~_t~fiUji :· .... , 5h6ii665 ,· . :'6}~ -~:~9.i.~~-~~!~9 -~~:Y\~~-... ~~ :.· Perm!t.{.~.\~~.~~~L~~-· ··'""'"'"'~ Wong_,. Wylie ., ... ~"•W·~-M-~~-s .. ~1.1:if*-'69§' 2.30 ) Page 4 of 4 l'fC~:iisJM8-~tiD9.l~~:v,~~ y:_ir:r::( t;::!ii[R:e,r:r:rjiflft!@)RijYJe\V,; i:;:;;:n:rw1l!l:::.;:r;;:r1T i::i;r;i,nr: :t:1:·::1w~~'iil'YWt~:i:Jr;::· s11J12oos j 1-1);· J:Qo Project Management Permit/ Plan Review Dye, James 5/11/2005 1.50 ::~~·ro1eCfM8Jfag~ry,-~--~~\ '"t ::~;-:;;;;i;t;t: dlU?:~lfiiff[~I~(~J~;~y:i·~~ -~~;-;; i f:~!;!'di r;:::1!Li: ~!'.!!'.ij'.'.i'.!;::'R'Y~'/~~~m~~::~ :T[!', · /1_1Js11212oos .. "n· 0/-?9 Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 5/13/2005 1.00 ''t:i:·rjgir\e~ri(lg:ReVi~~~;> 1 • p;·tiilF:~·rfoity·_P,t~6:·R~.1ii:iV.;::tfi'iJt:t;;C : ·1 ':rt·;·:vvO:ff~f;)'W1'i_~-;--?-~?1-~(?b.o~:i _ifp'.o .Project Management Permit/ Plan Review Dye, James 5/13/2005 0.75 1~n91.5·e~rJfffR~Y1~w.::;;::'. i'i.',,..:::i.;: i::11 t'.i'.t{F~t!J1Jf:L~tij_6J~.~Y.r.~~: i :;J!rn::iIIi:! :':;::::;tfi!ifo·1: 1:1r1 r ::w_o~{n:m1ie::· ,·:r;;":i::-rT :r~{t~??:QQ$_:n:rr::i:E1J>9 Engineeri_~g f3ey_i~w Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 5/19/2005 2.00 1t:,.~ngineer1r,g-_Rev[eW\'.fi: ·;-(("; ::1;1·m:i::::::t::;t~erm:irr~r~i'r1'."Flevrew;:;;;::;;;::"'''' ::::1:r:::wo'.ffg·;:.vwo:~:: sn412"oos::··-· ,::·/ 'Jl:;:o Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 5/24/2005 1.20 : '~rjQii,~~hrii{~:ey_iiWi],i"[::;: :r:;1; if ;:;;:;1~8(1lJ.iQ __ EJ8-_0:.f{8'.iJ~Vt u ii.:::::::;:: :iii'.::wo:~g·;:.YW,.(er ;r::;: 1 ?T$f??i~:q:9~~r ">.:.f:Oo' Project Management Permit/ Plan Review Dye, James 6/1/2005 1.00 :-:-:-Jffo!R;~-ril19'.~eyi~·w).:1f !X :'.:': H1'.:' L~~mi!tT~!~.r:iJ~-~YJ~W/ 1,i·;::> .. ,-ri;: :.:,:: :'t';i;l: ·r~tt~J::i rt!~_Q.nQ?i?w@:::: 1 "' r:TIYi}~~@?QQ§!I'.'.:i. -~f?Q Engineering Review Quality Control Review Sanders, James 6/3/2005 0.50 Total Hours Worked: 134.45 I I soc DDES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Summary of Related Activities/Projects/Dev. Applicant: SB! DEVELOPING Activity Number: PO BOX 73790 Project Number: \._LQ3~091LJ PUYALLUP, WA 98373 Development Number: PRE-PLAT 253 848 0820 Status: PRELAPPR Activity/Project# . Comp Type Status Fee Charges Hours Charges Payments Balance Due Lo3Poo15 · PRE:P.~At : P~i;,Ai>i>~/> · · ·, J~.:i9?._5f · ,$1{:i,39.2:r j1~.6I2,so. $0.00 A05BN208 BOND RECEIVED $121,000.00 $0.00 $121,000.00 $0.00 AossN346 , ,aq1;,b ... :'' . @cEiy~p \Jss,1lio':oo , )o:oo; $s5,,3,io.oci: jo,oo A05BN422 BOND RECEIVED $11,200.00 $0.00 _$11,200.9~ $0.00 Ao5c1169 ctil'rINs .. YAkJP ·t · ·· $0.Qo ·,, ': $0.9.9. . . $0.00 $0.00 A06BN007 , ' ~-----· •' .. -• 1 • L03V0036.:::_:, *L04SR034 ~L05FR042 : L05MI042 't05PC112 L05PCI30 BOND OPEN · • ···s··u··B·v··A·,·R, , ·''GRAN:rno: ' ,\",,:,. ;; .• , .• , j ,,: ', ..... : • .s.: ,,!,I,'--''%'"' ".L, ... , ... J' ,..i'I SlTEREV COMPLETE "' . . , ... l"''~"T'"~.·.·--, ,., , .. , . ., ,. .... ~.,, . .,., •• "I·,,·, , f.lN/\\e.,::': :'. .. )\J:'PR();Y§D.: , L-MISC COMPLETE , __ q-lA!'!ClE RE::r/\YC::.I ..... . CHANGE COMPLETE *L05SI 106 , } . \ INsfllcti L05Sll07 INSPECT Loss-11-08 .·. _ ~~'>f:]NSPE¢'f. : ·. ,PUNci-ii.sTi .. :.:: " .. , .. "'' .. , , , ,., , ., ,·1,.,.,.,.n., .... PENDING PEJ-ibri-ki. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ;-_._._$···_9·1·.·_1·5··.·. ',".:,,; • •. ··$1 938 90·:7 · ·$20·· 3·6·6· ·5· ·$0.00 ' :;\;,;:.,,, O ,., .. , ..... '. .. ,,,.,:(,,;.,, '-;,,,,/, ,,, ;,,M ..•• : ...... ~ .. 0 ,, ,,, , 'o .j $19,687.11 $0.00 $19,687.11 $0.00 ··,.· Js~.ci/;1,oiif:i_ ..... _ iso:o'o'' :$59,961)( $o.9o· $112.45 $688.28 $800.73 $0.00 ,,.$}o:i.i5'(: · · :$0.00 $103.67 ~6.oo $205.28 $970.84 $1,176.12 $0.00 .'~77;4<1i!ifa. ···,, •$q,op : iJzj;49~.o4 : . •• · ··. $0,00 $2,565.94 $144.90 $2,710.84 $0.00 $2.~13)4 C:s'iz.4.5 i . ., ' $7,737;95 $0.oo' TOTAL: $303,087.32 $20,797.67 $323,884.99 $0.00 * Asterisk denotes Permit under Project Management The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DOES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate In effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applic_ant. All fees must be paid in full before_ DOES issue_s Fin_al Approval, T.C.O._-or_C.O. ... Page I of6 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Project Management Statement Renton, Washington 98055~ 1219 Project Name: EVENDELL SUBDIVISION Project Location: 13606 156TH AVE SE SBI DEVELOPMENT-KURT WILSON PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 Statement Date: Customer: Permit#: Project#: Parcel Number: Permit Type: Status: Project Management Statement Managed Project Hours Budget: Total Hours Worked (see Hours Detail): Total Budgeted Hours Remaining: Fixed Fees: Desc_riptl_on .. ·-.... . .... 2004. Bldg _Fee .. R.eduction •• Bldg Inspection Bldg Plan'..Check':' .. :.: : ''. .... ':;: .... · Counter Service Fees Total Fixed Fees: Managed Project Hours Budget: T~tal ,Man~ged, Proie~t B,udget , · ~otal _Amoun\D 7terr7f ·.· •.. ,,!, [!, •. , .. AMOUNT:DUE •AT APPl.llCATION: ' ', '' " '' ',•', ', ,,,,' ' '' ''' Pa ments: , s', ' ', ... 1 ••• _: ! ,\. $2,647.09 $45,933.30 $48,580.39 . Date Posted Payment Type CkloglD Amount 511912004 · , -check -· ·· · • . ·•• , . , . · ..... L. '~ · · -.· ·$38,893.58 . 9110/2004 . Transfer i=rom.A04P6119 $379.13 Deferred ~--,--·-.. $0.00 Check# "'3538 .... ._. __ 9/10/2004:' .. Transfer,F}o'r\'\;L:04M1037T:iiriD . ;' $145,76. , .. , ...... 9/13/2004 Transfer From L04V0056 $448.04 1;. 912112004· narisfef'From :rn4.SR057'. .·::-,·.i .. , ,. ,::·.;$695:so: 10/14/2004 Check 75796 $488.70 3866 1111212004 · 'Ctiecl<"·r· ' ·•·· ·,· ······ ···7575r ,., ··· $S-22l.5T' · ..... -, •3910 3/3/2005 ·check ., -~·-· ... . . . .........• $1 :308.11-. . .. .. ··4151 3/f1/2005 · Ctieck' : . . . .. /30660":::'.· •. ' $1 74:.i: 15 ·-., .... -· 4198 .... 4/5/2005 Transfer To L04Si1B8 · ($1,744 15) ··· · -· · · ··· · Total Payments Received: :cURR,ENT (E~ciudes Deferred Amount): I .. , ' · .. ·· . .Total .Balance: ,.111, .,·· ,;,·,·· ,,ri ./ 8/9/2006 L04SR024 L01P0016 1423059022 SITEREV COMPLETE 317.00 317.00 0.00 Due Now .... ($436.04) $1,744.15 ·. $1..1.3.3. 70 $205.28 $2,647.09 $45,933.30 ,, ::r .. '·· . . $48;580.391 ' ' ., -·---,~,. • ,,. .. ,""'"""I ·r·•~• t• ... ' ($48,580.39) . $0.00 Page 2 of6 Disclaimer Language for Permits under Project Management Based on permit information submitted by the applicant, the Department of Development and Environmental Services has determined the amount of review fees for the subject application. The fees shown do not include ancillary permit fees, project-related mitigation fees, or any other fees that are passed through to the applicant from other agencies or as part of the project's environmental review. Fee estimates are based on information submitted to ODES by the applicant prior to finalization of the permit application. In addition, estimates are determined by utilizing historical data gathered from projects of similar type, size, and scope. DDES's fee estimate is subject to revision under conditions including, but not limited to, the following: 1) Unknown or undisclosed site or project Issues 2) Changes in the project 3) Incomplete information from applicant 4) Errors in applicant information or submittal 5) County code fee changes 6) Appeals Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. All fees must be paid In full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. For billing questions, please call 206-296-6659 Hours Detail Function Engineering Review .•.• Projec\Manaefemi,ri( _Engineering Review Engiri_eBri_~g 8e\'i8W' r·r~. Project Management . ··e ng in~Br"i'ng · .R~V.i.~;;.;-:. Engineering Review ·_Engineedrlg .. R8Vi8W. Engineering Review · ·, tr~ffi~Ril:vie_i,,_, ··· · Permit Number: Task Permit I Plan Review .,, , ,' :··,1'.' p:e·ry,,,r_(p1a.ff{eVJ~.W · ... , ., .... ,,. '· ···· · Permit I Plan Review "':'"i '', ·fi8rnjit) ·p1~:n' R_EIVi~·wi·' Permit/ Plan Review .,1 J:>~rrriJtf Pl~.11:.~~yi8~. ',i Permit/ Plan Review . .. , ·:.~errntt.iJ>·!~r(Rjyi~~ Permit/ Plan Review 1".",::rraffic ·R·evi·e·w" .. <,- E_~_gineenng _Revi_e\V. Permit/ Plan Review :1~~9l~t~~~l]g'j:(~y-i_8,~_: ·permii'TPi8'f(R8Vl8Wi·'i::-':::--""•·;··· Engineering Review -Pe."rmiri"PiS"ii'R8VieW·· ·- }=i/1~.ff{eV·i_~_W;,·: ,::1'·: _ ·~-_:.;e.~f_rriift:.eJS.~){~i1tte~?:::. Geological Review Permit/ Plan Review :~hQlri~er[nQJ·{EiV.l~W :::-,-,:,;;::: .. i\~F.{~·.'.;::~~P~ffilt)J:iilriJ~e.vJ~W~· 1·1 ·, ·.-,. ,1. Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review J~.ir .. a\ ~~Yi~.wl , .. :: . .-,~·t-· .. ~: PemittTP1ir1''ReVi8W""" .. , Grading/Clearing Review ,., ·· FiEt'ld''Ch8Ck ............. '"' · ., . .,, :· .. 1;,Q9i.~.~-~t!~9 ·R.~\ii~~ .. ,., ·.· "' ,., ··::· .::I'.'.'.'.'.J~.~fm!(/)~(a,·n:iR_ijj,_i_e'~ ·.:·:n.-'.···::. ·., .. , Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review _e·ngi~e.erinQJ{8.Y!~W'.T''.:··· ,··i ... , .'))~ITlJ.!t·, P_1~fR_8~J8Yi .:,:::2:·~::_ · Project Management Permit/ Plan Review Page 3 of6 L04SR024 Statement Date: 8/9/2006 Name Workdate Hours Dye, James 5/18/2004 0.25 ,'.',';,f.'; bye; James . '5/2~/i004 -.. 1,75 Walken, Gerald 5/26/2004 1.80 ::wa1iier1J3eiafd . : 5r,is1200~ 01.0 Dye, James 5/26/2004 1.50 .1, , by~,J~O}~I 512?@04 .. i,2$ Walken, Gerald 5/27/2004 4.10 Wailieii:c,eiii1c1 · ·s,1,2004 · 0.20 Walken, Gerald 6/1/2004 5.20 ·: Pirrih: Henry :.i ·· ... fl/112004 2.00 Cheshier, Beth 6/2/2004 0.50 iiyal~en'.:tfi,iai,( si2_i2cici4 .... ·060 Walken, Gerald 6/2/2004 5.50 ..Si"1nici~s. ~at~ck ,· ... )it2i?d04 ............ \.00 West, Lawrence 6/2/2004 1.00 :. Wa1ken;gc,_ra1<( ·•· . :6/3/2004 1:oo Walken, Gerald 6/3/2004 0.50 .::§ii,iiiii>6~:PJi!rfoli . '..-6i3t2ci04. '. . o.s_o Ballweber, James 6/7/2004 2.00 vyi,1~~11:Girald .. c , 6/8L2004 .. 0.50 Walken, Gerald 6/8/2004 5.40 Wan,i,n,:Geraid• 6/9/200.4. .. )10 Dye, James 6/9/2004 0.50 1 :·EnQi~88£!r.iQ,.R8'Vlew:::. p~rmit_TP1_8ri)f8Vle~~ .. ',:•:;', ,,:.!1.'· , 1/Vaikeci: geiiild : ; §/10r.?()o,i .. 6 90 Engineering Review r_·:: :~.n9i~~~!!rlg'.R~Vielh,'. :.; .. Engineering Review Engineering Review Engineeri.ng .R.eyi_e.Vt' · :: J~f1girl8_8"i.iilg ReVl8w.'.·' Permit/ Plan Review , : .. ' 1', ,. ... -~~fffiJt.'(J~i~ri'..R_ij\1'.i~~ Permit/ Plan Review . : •. i , ..... :e~ITl'.IJf(~1an)~"t;y1ew,.,· · Permit/ Plan Review ......... :::e_e·~Jf/F:i~rfR8'Vt8W_ .... Project Management Communications -Telephone :, '_ '.~rfrjin·eefi.l'lg··f(~V18_W'·' ,.. ·.··~irini(I p1~r.,J~8y1e~;·. · . -· -- Project Management Permit/ Plan Review EriQ\nEi~:ririg'R~yJ~~-· ... ,;: , :..Jt8~rf,it} -Pl8n ~ ReV\eY/ ~~~- Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review . Eng/rl'E!e-rfng·. ReiVi.8W_:;-.... _ .. Qli8.iiti:G9ntr.O(~.~\li.e·w~ Final Review Meetings .. P~<Jj~#·~~·h:~g~fn~ri,i_.. "('f' , . P~_fiiiif ! .. P.1~_ryJ~~Vi~~, .~ . Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review ·e3_eOi_OQ\~8j_R'e.~ieVi'' ·._·:r.. . '.:P_8.rniif(pf8rj"_RiYI~~ :,.'"j: ,:~ Engineering Review Permit I Plan Review , 'Engl_rtee·rfri9iR~VL8.W ;i ; ·:"·:'.·::'.··,~::-_QUii1ItY-C_O~frQ1.Re:~!-8W'.:,.1:,: (3eolog_ic:3I Review Permit/ Plan Review ·: .. PT.9i~~t~~~il9E!rri~!1G;·.:-..... ]J~.rfnffXE(~:~J~~Y.i.i;::::·::·· Geological Review Permit/ Plan Review I,· ;;,~ng1~.~~il~"9'.RiYi.fa"W::::·::-~·:::::\·. ,'Pei-mil /.f>lall R8V1eW' Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review .... :EnQiri'~eri'l19"f~~V.i8Vf '·'./ ·: 1 '' ""l'i .,~r>:r.r·,,~ .. :,:rpe:rn,w.1·P.#i~~R~\li~W· Engineeri.ng Review Permit I Plan Review '' E_l1gli,8~ring·RliVY~w' -~eQTii! /. PlanJ~e'.'-'_i_ew,,;' Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review . F:ri9i.ff~e.ri"rlg R8'vi8W:.2.: · · -~~fuill)J:>!~~· ~.B.Yi.BW,, Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review ~r,girl~erin·g B~Xi8V/:'. . .: f:~rrijJf/ __ p1ari)feV'{~W· f:ngineering .Review Permit/ Plan Review \1ye11irl~ 13.~Vi~w , · "\'. ,-..p·erJTiiiPlSri R8View Financial Guarantees Mana .. i=irlarlcial Gu8r8iitee·s-Mgt. & Mon "EnQin.88r_iriglR8ylf!\o¥. ,·p~fini,t,/.P.[a~.~"e~ie.~... -.. -· Engineering Review . Englri_~8ririg.8evi~_W· - Engineering Review "·~ng1~e·e:rfo·s · 13ev.1~vr~ Engineering Review .. ::(ram~--~~Vi~.w·· ·-' _i., ... .''..''.' Engineering Rev.iew ,·~rigih~~'~il19 f3.E!.Yf8w r Traffic Review . Tr8fflc··R8VieW;. :· Engineering Review ... Erigil'\8~ring. R8v.i8~ .. :., , -. ,·. ,1 ........ Permit/ Plan Review : ... , ,: ,:,,)~~fn:ii.tJ pJ8nB~Y,~~ Permit / Plan Review •1 Permit'/Pian Review· ····.[ .. Permit/ Plan Review ~·:rra_ffi~:'.R:,:t"y1ew Permit/ Plan Review P8rnilt i Pi8rl.RiVi8W;.,.<';;: .-~, Traffic R8Vi8w ·-~ :t ra·tfl.C:-~~Vi~yj·;-~/.--·:·· ... Permit / Plan Review : : P~rrri (( Pr.!~ci }~ey1e~(.k '•. , .. I, Walken, Gerald 6/12/2004 0.50 ',.Wal~en, Geiald 511412904 ·:. 3.0jl Walken, Gerald 6/14/2004 1.20 Wal.ken, Gerald ·. . 6/15/2004 6 80 Walken, Gerald 6/15/2004 1.00 1 ',. • .waiken;Geralci_ s11512iio<i, ... .:2.00 Walken, Gerald 6/15/2004 2.80 .. W~lken, G,eralg , . 6/16/2004 . 6 .. 90 Dye, James 6/16/2004 0.50 . \\/~lken, §erald . 6/17/2004 250 Walken, Gerald 6/21/2004 3.70 Saride:rs;'James .. , ·.stiilibo~.. · 0.50 Floren\, Raymond 6/21/2004 1.00 Dyii, J_am'es , J. . . :6(2,1/2004 0.50 . Walken, Gerald 6/22/2004 0.10 \Nest,:Cawrence ... 6/2)12Q04 .... :' .. ?.00 Walken, Gerald 6/24/2004 3. 70 Siind,ers; Jam'~$ 6/24ii6()4 2 50 West, Lawrence 6/24/2004 1.00 , PYi,J.iiiii•• , ... ., ..• ·· a,2<i,2_oo{ • 1.50 West, Lawrence 6/25/2004 1.75 ; Wai~en; 'Ge.ral( 612.8/2_00{ 2 80 Walken, Gerald 6/28/2004 0.20 -~.:• Wa]li'eri, Gerald .... .'.... 6t2St2064 f20 Walken, Gerald 6/28/2004 1.10 ·,waiken, Ge,a1a ·· :: e1§/i9tl{ •· 1,so Walken, Gerald. 6/29/2004 5.50 . \\/alkeri, g~rald ....•. 6/30/21l04 . .. 300 Walken, Gerald 6/30/2004 0.50 . 'Wa11ie~· .. 9!!rj1g 513012.004 . i:20 Walken, Gerald 6/30/2004 0.80 , Gl'llen, Nick·. -,.·, · ·5r.ici12.064 . 3:50 Graves, Stacy 7/6/2004 0.50 :walien,.:C,er~ld .-7/8@04. '.0,.6Q Walken, Gerald 7/13/2004 0.50 .......... W,aikeri,deiaig ... 1,1si,2c,of··· 1:10 Wong, Wylie 7/15/2004 1.00 · : ... woiig,wy'1ie.. .. ·"'<t/i612004• 1,.30 Walken, Gerald 7/17/2004 1.00 .. . ;. perrin,f!ency.. . 7/19/200~ 1_.00 Wong, Wylie 7/20/2004 0.40 · i i,yqiig, Wylie, ?i?OJ?ii~f . . jog Perrin, Henry 7/23/2004 2.00 ·· ·. ~, peir1n; 8eiiiy · · ; ·· ,.7,25120,0~ foo Wong, Wylie 7/27/2004 1.60 . '. I.Yci'rigJVylie: : .'. 7[.28[.20!)4 1,50 Permit/ Plan Review .):~~rfu.iJ I f?i.~·6. F{8.Y.i~~:. ~.;1.:,:.:.: ~J'. Engineering Review i :,: .... E;~g(Q.E!iiiffig J~eYfeW.,: ... ~-· .E_ng.in.eering Revi_ew Permit/ Plan Review ''1 '.Erlgi~.~e_f.i,rig,R~vi5~\. : ,: .,~,.\" .:-E~/rjj({elti.6J{8.YJ.~.' Engi_neering Review Permit/ Plan Review ;,' _,}[S~i~~.~-~.Y!~-~ /J:r:.1.· .1.i.<•-ifr. , !', •1,', ,:I~~tr!C?~~~-Y.!~Y!'.~S':.1:1:i: ... ,~ r/ Traffic Review Traffic Review _ErjQi_ni~~rtiiQ\~_8\/i.~-~, ,, f)~ffi3i((,p)Sfl}~~V·!~.~.:'. Engineer.ing .. RevieVi Field Check ·:E_n·gi~e.ering}~8\ii.~W', ,·, ', .. ·. -1·1•• '1·:_per[lit,i:~·1~_n·,J~JiYi~~· Building Plans Examination .Re~i~ion Proce~s.ing ··a_UiiCH~f P1~6'S 'E~Srri_i~~_fi6_1'1_' ·ii:· ' :_, .".'.:~~-~R~.Vlsl_O_t,: PrOijSSf~·g-~·' Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review , .. _ .. E.llgiO~e~r,1rig_~R~YJ.~~.'~:~.. P~mjlf/ P_fa/{t~ii'VJeit.'· -'' r;r,·· 'T Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review . Sµildj~Q ~J~.~s· .E_~.a~I~a'ii()!)_ Rj'Vf~i'C}.'r(_Pio.q~jStijf ··· .. __ Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Ei,Qinee·r1ijg. R_evi_8\Y . . <P8mih T~i'a'O')~-e·v·!e~· Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review E.nginij~·~i~g'f.~.~V.i8W'_·, -... P~.@i! /.E!.~Q .. ~.8.Vi.8~. Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review . Proj8.Ct."t,Aa~age"rri.~_nt.. '',"P.~mii/, P.1~_;;-~~.vi~w Engineering Rev_iew Permit/ Plan Review . .-E~gir,~8ring,_~8VJ,8w.' , ,I, e.enTi"(t_"t P.1a~J~8yi"'Y/~.~; Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review , );ri9i~~-e.!!6g .R~~V!~."'.' , "'"· 1,_ ·, ·-·~.J~effui!.t! B.I.~~ .. ~i~i~~.:. E.ngineering .Review Permit/ Plan Review '. ,,' Eiigin.~.el'i ng' R~Yi_evl .)i; 1J . .',).'~:: f;i:i'.~· Etirrri i~ '/ eta.ri}~~Y.1.~1.-,:.-j' Eng.ineeri~g .~eview Permit/ Plan Review ·,. :'i GBol_OQi_C,~!. R~iYiEIW_:_;~ .-:_\P8.frhW'iJ~.i~h': R·ey·,~~c·:,:(. J::ng.ineering. Re.v_i_ew Permit / Plan Review -:~_0gil1Serl6g · R~:Yi~'.~?\ -:·P · .? .. ,,.,., §:P.~miitl.J~i_Sn)~.ey_1,~w. ,'. .En.gin.~er.i.ng ~t3view Permit/ Plan Review .; .. Erl9i6e:~rJ.llg)~.8YJ~~~.:.. ·:',·.)?.~°th,)~ '(eJSh°LFf8·v:i~'.\~/; .. Project Management Permit/ Plan Review rn· .. ·1:·ngirte.er.1~g··~ev,evi ,, I'''("' ..... -~-~'}>fifrriif{P.ia'._Q.'A~Yi'f3Y/t''.~::_ ::•:l"I)'" Proj~ct Management Permit/ Plan Review ~_iigi.n·eeAQ'g .R.i_~i~W ·· ·· "J'~ffoit'i ·piarr:~~YJ~~~ .. Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review . 'Eiigf ~~e~fri'9)~.eY.i~~ . ·:. "' '•· P£i'rinTt '(Pi8'(.f{8V!eVr: Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review -_-Engiri_~~iQg ~8Vi~~ Engineering Review .. E;.~giri~.er.\~g-88.Yi~~ . Engineering Review .. S.n9i~8ering .. R.~vi~vi<· .. 11 Geological Review ·. ProjectManagen,ent. Pr_oject Ma_nagement Wet18rid :~·eview .i.: · Project Management '.El'lgirl.~~ri_ijg .R.~.vJ.~~; ·, Land Use. Applications R.ev ·,.PrOje6(M_an.~Q·e.111e~t , E_ngir,eering Review :_ :PrOj8_ci'J".8'.n~'QB'rf\8rlt· ·:··~:;_: '.M:~~~irjQS·, ·::.:·., .°-~~-.':. Meetings ..... P8mlit 1·P18ri R8VieW" F>e·miii/f>1ai, REIViEIW- :j~.u]fJ_ty ~Qri~.1"9!.R.~~i.~~--: ... Permit/ Plan Review ,.:~~~rir.ii.t/,_Plan'Reyieiv'. Permit/ Plan Review ~eimit !'Plan Review Permit/ Plan Review ', I i'.i:,. : "Mie~ings' . -. Meetings. i"P,~f!1Jt t~Yc~~:.~eY!~W .. , , . ,i.( .•. Permit / Plan Review ,:,i · :P.eniiJt (Bi~-~~F:i~Yl_;~:- Permit I Plan Review Wong, Wylie 712812004 :: :Wcitlg;,vyyu~~ :)12/i/20~. ; '·"· •. , ....... Wong, Wylie 712912004 11\/o~g,,Wylie ... • .I12~f?.004 Wong, Wylie 713012004 .J)~r[iQ, ljeDry ......... 812J20!):! Perrin, Henry 81312004 ,.!t'o'~g, 1111y1ie ·· ~ · , 01~@0~ . Wong, Wylie 81512004 . ,: ,Vif.,i:ig. ilWiie L .: , · .... s,s/200~ ... · Chow, Hou-Ching 811112004 cf,o:W, t-io~:C:tiing'i .. 1. s/j~i26il(, . Wong, Wylie 811212004 . ' 'f' I '' ''C, ,.'' '1/1/orig,Wylie''' :' 8/12/20.0il Wong, Wylie 8/1212004 ·. r··ctiowi8o~=c11ing' ·· · .·,·' ~11'ii2004 · Wong, Wylie 811312004 ... :wing; WYiie.'· s113i200~ Wong, Wylie 811312004 wong;,IIVy!i• a11s12oo_4 Wong, Wylie 8/1612004 . [J.y\,: Jain.es 8/16/?004 Wong, Wylie 811712004 VV<>~g;Wy1ie . _atf7ii604 . Wong, Wylie 8117/2004 ·.:.·.woijg;Wy1ie •.. • 8/1~1200_4· .. Wong, Wylie 811812004 • · · ::w.o,r,g,Wy1~~ , ., J1.1s12.004 .. Wong, Wylie 811812004 ' ;;·, .-w~st,):'avir~cicii: >, ; ., 8/18/2004 Wong, WyUe 811912004 ,';~'.i(,r~:i::r:.·:: ./i/.,W~D9.~WY1J.i:. r.i.: ... , ... i~ .. Jt1~t~ciq~,, ... Wong, Wylie 811912004 . ,·,w_orig;.vi/y11~· . a,1912004 Dye, James 811912004 :'~?·..:· _::::!?'.:?,J?r 1~~;i(.~1;:\~VV~~'QX ~!(8_\: ... , , .... · ·r-~" ·::adQt2·0:04 Dye, James 812012004 '"":r"i'.: ·:e·· r:;:·:: r 1Qy8,_JS&,~s''. 1 ·.'8/23/2004·;- Wong, Wylie . ll/23/2004 ,, •. 11\/oiig,Wyn('~:~ ,sg31~001. Wong, Wylie 812312004 : \6'ong: 'iVYlie;· ii1241~004. Wong, Wylie 812412004 : y.,o~g. WyJi• : ]i2412ob4 · • Wong, Wylie 812412004 ··· .. saiid~rs:.~,i:nies .. ~124r.1004· West, Lawrence 812412004 , .·i?Y~:J~nie_s . . . , .8/24/~004 . ,,1.,: Dye, James 8124/2004 e,men,f.Jlck · ai24i2oof Dye, James 813112004 . ,y\/o~fr'iYYli•. , .. · .. 9/_1/?Q04' Scharer, Karen 9/1/2004 ':·1.,. !Jy9~J~[118S ·. . . . .. 911(200~ Wong, Wylie 91212004 \ bye; James.. 9r.!12004 ... Wong, Wylie 912112004 Page 4 of6 2.50 .,.: .0,30 3.00 3,0Q 1.50 ,., j:qci 2.00 ... ?,~9 2.00 ·o:ao 5.00 {oo 1.00 ,.:.so 2.50 · }do 1.00 · i:oo 1.30 _1.20 2.50 'o)o 2.00 f2o 1.50 2,4Q 0.90 ,1.20 1.30 ' ~1,!;Q 1.50 , .• Q-?Q 0.80 ·fs.o 0.75 3.oo 0.50 Tis. 2.00 100 3.00 Too 1.50 070 1.50 f()Q 2.00 · " 100 1.25 1.50 0.75 ··o:,o 0.50 . J .. 50 1.50 Engineering Review '·l?roj~~.(i 1\,(ijn'1:ft'i~:ttj~'rj_t \' E.~gine5:rin_g Revie~ '.P.iOj~~· ~~_n89illlefr( -i:' P,~!iflit'.'!_P.JiiLR~Yl~i-,_-L.:r::·:;.,;·: ·.\_i1 .... ::~:gy~;}~ffi:~~·.~.:,· .. ,.1 .. :., :: '~ .. ~1.~·g,o•t', · ..95.0 1.00 0:2§ 1.50 .1.50 0.25 . 1.50 0.25 ;,0,50 1.00 1.50 0.50 o.~s 0.80 O.sj) Traffic Review :.' ~:!=.69t.68~'rtff9".'f~.e_vi·~~f. Final Review r i:>ioi~ctM~iiageiiie_nt __ Traffic Review ~n9i.Q~~i_i~g·-~eVi~~l: .' _Engi_neeri_ng -~ev_iew , Proj8Ct ~_MSnaQ8'rnEiiif~. - Engineering Review .l;ng!rle_e~ing .J3.eyi_~~ ... , Project Management : .. ,E.riginee.rJr,g Revie.\'.t' -,:., .. ·1 .. • Engineering Re~ie~ ·,,., V Field Check Wong, Wylie 912212004 :::-r::p·e·rmit '/:F,ian·:Revi·ew,·:c: ·-·-rraffic· Rev·iew· ----· -··-· ... -i,··· ·:T:J),: :~1 ~\\'.'.:.·;;:::rP·ye,s.~~me.~_1 .. :'.:1; .. : .. :.· .9f241ioo4 Lc:1ngley,_ K_risteri 9/:z'4/2004' · .. :'~'..' P..8rifoj t ~-1~Q ~~YfijW"·:~,:J:.\r~~.'.~.'?t2 ·,1~ ... :,, Permit/ Plan Review ,, ... ~8/i:n"lt[J>.!ii~''.R·~.¥J~W,' ~;· .... ''":r··-t:i·: ,,, Traffic Review ... _-.: ·_; , P~imif( F{faf6'· R~y"ievy·,, .. Permit/ Plan Review · · • peiinii/f.'1aiii'!eviev, · Permit / Plan Review Per-rTiitfPtan R&View·. ·Permit, PiEin Review· : . J~~rmJt/ .~1.a,r:1 R8Y_i~Y.t'.~: Permit/ Plan Review -' . ,,1 ... , ::::r :~. WonifWii1ie' '. · .. •s12i12oq;f Florent, Raymond 9/2712004 .. :• :'0ye;~~nij,i( .. •r · 9i~71?004' Perrin, Henry 912712004 Wori9. mue · §129/2004 Wong, Wylie 10/512004 pye, J~m~•~ . .:.. . · • 1016i2011~ ., Vllong, 11\/yli~ 101712004 ' 11\/ong, Wylie '.Jbti1700§' · Dye, James 10/8/2004 ,vyiirJ9. WyJie '. 191f112qof .. __ lrJong, INylie 1011412004 ·'-·· • .; ..... ·-···-1-..... ,_ 0.25 :fqo 1.00 !=n9iii.~EfrirlifR~Xi8~ I! · .. Bu.ilding .Pl.ans Examination Engine'8rin·g ReVi8:W ' · · · Engineering Review f:.rl9fri8_e.ring1~8:-'.i8W Engineering Review ·Proj8:CfM.~r18Qerry:e~t Engineering Review ·. ~~QI11~Elrlri'g:ReVieW Project Management EijQl!l88rln9 .. RBVi~_Y/ Engineenng Review _ ~ng~l'!,~8ltrig_ R~V-i8-w .. · Engineering Review . Erigi~~-~rifig' Ri~f8W: Engineering Review s:ui1~JnQ .. P1aQSEiifrr1[ri8ti6ri ·: . Building .Plans .Ex~mi_r:iation ·· · B~i.1.df~g··~!~.~~ _,l;?'ami_~.ci{l~11. Engineering Review _E~gineering' R~Vi8~ .· - Engineering Review ~and. Usf;I ~PpliCa_tiq.ns ~~~ fJroj!3ct_Managem_ent 1 _: R~Oj~.~.M~ri.~g~~,8'1t '''. : I,, . Engineering Review ;; ._i1=~gir\.~Elfingi~.~:Yi~~:.:.:: i'i '.: Engineering Review Pf()jeci. ~a-~·~ge:m~_dt! :·: Engi~.eeririg. Review · :.:QeQ(6QfoB1 R8 .. V1eW·t'; i':.: .. :--:.; !., , Engineering Review i iEr\i;lll,El~tirlg .R~'\/,i'~~'.'. 1·1 ::, . 'l. E.ngi_n~ering .. R~vi.ew Ellgi~813.i/l1g.~~~-i8W: , , r,·,· :ii Engineering Review ': iEllgil1'8ir:(h'Q)~8Vi8v,i.?' Engineering Review : :Proi~:~(Mari~Q~1),:~n{ ,.: .. E~gineering Revi.e1N .•. ~-n·g!heefi~g~~iY.i.~.~.--·'. ·'._.:: ... Project Management , . ·Er1gl'ii'eer:jng· R8v18V{ Engineering Review :.E~gl~~irlifa··~~V!.8;: .. Engineering Review Tr~ffic ~~Y\ew · Engineering Review . Erigl_ne~r.i_ng _Re\fie_w: Land Use Applications Rev Traffic (3:eview ,. · -· Page 5 of6 [W9n§, vyy1ie .. 1911512094 .· Revision Processing Chow, Hou-Ching 10/18/2004 .\00 1.00 . : :l.76 · permit /,Plan Revie"'., . Wo~g, \/Vylie, ... 1011aii0:04 ... Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 10/18/2004 2.00 . p'8i.~it (~ia~~ R8Yiew· .. )h[(fog',IWY!i_8:·----10/)'~/2004 .. · :roo 2.00 0.25 2.50 Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 10/19/2004 Permit/Plan f:<~vie,lr . 1 :·• _·Dye, James 10/19/2.004 '. Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 10/20/2004 .· -l'ermii I Pia ii Review ... . . .. :. -· Wong;Y,.,Ylie . . , 10/20/2004 . 3.00 0.25 1,00 3.00 1.50 1.75 3.00 3.00 4.0Q 4.00 ?,tio 0.50 :l.oo 1.50 0.50 1.75 0:25 0.80 Permit/ Plan Review Dye, James 10/20/2004 .eemi1UJ>iii,n1:<ev.i~w. ~·-· C ':: .. :.::c: .. :.Btiqa]lsil<~ie_ .1012112004 - Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 10/21/2004 . pejii,ii(PJliri"liii.vle."'. ...• ,, •.... ····.' ~:,r•·; ·wong,i/Vylie __ -16{2112004 Permit/ Plan Review Dye, James 10/22/2004 '"_pi,rriii[/ Plan Rev!eii= -' • . .... .. •• 'r: ___ Wo[lg,,\/Vyl[e .. 10122/2004 Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 10/22/2004 , . _ReyLsici,~pr.ocessi~g , , : :.i'·: . -·: . · chow; l::lou,ctijrig -__ -10/23/2004 Revision Processing Chow, Hou-Ching 10/23/2004 Revision Processi rig ' . . ..· :c::t;:Qw, 8ou'.C::hfrig · 1 iii:is1200~ · Meetings· .... . .... . Wong, Wylie 10/25/2004 permTt1P1an-Reiilew. ·.: ... ·--wciii!iiVWlie_ 1oiis/2064 Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 10/25/2004 : fy18~iir,9~.:._:: ·: · .... , ... !.:·,:. Permit/ Plan Review ···Proj~c(t,\aQag~m~i:!(tee E.~\infaUng Permit/ Plan Review :· 1 ,·1;·:)~~mi.i~:J..~t~r!.J~_i:-.ii_~w- Permit I Plan Review i !:: il?~fo1l(Ff~~· ~~_VYiYi:::·: 1 i • q Field Check :Ti:i::1~::~e.r.rn.1u;-~)an1{~v1~w:::l:: Permit / Plan Review : ·i ~~fffi if li.f.~@1 !}~~Y!~\fi :::,: Permit/ Plan Review :-.~~friii.f iff~n ·!:{:~:V!~V'1 t:,:· Permit/ Plan Review ::·,.1~~fnl!i 'i ·p:(B'6)~~\/i8Y./ : ... Quality Control Review '!P.8'rrriit I-Piii'll:R8VleYi'·' ,. , ~·Peimit ;' Pian'·R8Vi8W , ,,_,,,)'~~'if(PJ~n .. ·~:~.Vi~~: Permit/ Plan Review . : >)>~trnif~ p·1an:.!'.f8.V:i:~fri': .. ,_~ .r .... Permit/ Plan Review -~~f~riil((f>'.l~~~~Rijy_ij~ Permit/ Plan Review 'trSffic RevleY.i" · · ----· "i · Permit/ Plan Review . e8rri,~ I ~18ri'.ReVl8W .. Meetings · fr8ffi~ ~.8vi~w ;!>i:har~r.iaren. · 1 o/25/2Q04 . Dye, James 10/25/2004 sariile~;J~mes . 10{2·s1200.1 _ Wong, Wylie 10/26/2004 , Wong;\/Vylie, 1Q/26/20~4. .: -1 :so. Wong, Wylie 10/26/2004 2.40 ciy~: Jaines 1012ei2694 , . o ?5. Wong, Wylie 10/28/2004 1.00 · "'.''lw~st!,Lliiwie11ce: .1012812004 .. . ,.a.so Wong, Wylie 10/29/2004 1.10 · 1\l\/ong,iVVy1ie:: :·01 111112ooi( .. : ... J~o Wong, Wylie 11/1/2004 (1.20) ··· Rlioaas;'1<ate 1~1:i1299-1 ·· · o s_o Wong, Wylie 11/3/2004 1.20 Wong, vyy1ie ,. 1:fi:i"12004 . 2,00 Sanders, James 11/3/2004 0.50 , , , :.1 ! oxf~•m•~ ·· ·· · ., . 1}131?00{: o.5o Wong, Wylie 11/4/2004 2.50 ·=w~ng;\/1/ylie. : .. _ 11/412004 ''o)o Dye, James 11/4/2004 0.50 · • ·wong, VVy1if. . .. 111512004· ... foe Wong, Wylie 11/16/2004 1.40 ..: , wo:nil:Y','Yli~:-· ·· 1111112094 _ _t2.5oi Wong, Wylie 11/17/2004 2.50 • ,':f:errin, H~nry. f1i1712oo<i 1.00 Wong, Wylie 11/18/2004 2.50 . , :vJ911g,,Wylie 117Jsf?_ob4 (2.Sii) Scharer, Karen 11/18/2004 0.50 .,,1-1 ,... •• · •• ~§ri,_l::jn_~~. · 1)11?/2004 0~50 Traffic Review Traffic Review Perrin, Henry 11/18/2004 2.00 · Engi~eer!og· R~viElw. Perm.it_/_ p1a.n. R_~vleiw . VYfi119,,\Nyiie ,-•· --· · · 1,1/19/2004 (3.59) Engineering Review Permit I Plan Review · E~Qlri8ei-ing ~8.view. .. . P~8f!"jt /.?!.a!i'· Rij_V[f;!.w Wong, Wylie 11/19/2004 3.50 .: wong; WYiie 1 .. 112212004 · too Engine:ering _Revi_ew Permit/ Plan Review J~ngi~~~ring f.{evi_~i.v·. ,r P8miit'1·P1an R8Vl0W Engineering Review ·-·permit TP1ari R8view· Engineeffng·-~evT8W:'.' .P8rrr,_ft 1:p1ari~ F,fivie:W.'. Wong, Wylie 11/22/2004 (2.00) :\i\ioiig,yvy1ie"_. 11122/2064 · :i.so Wong, Wylie 11/22/2004 (3.50) wo~g. \/Vylii\~ . . _ i 1.122J20Q.\ 2.60 Land Use Applications Rev Project Coordination E~gin8erin9 R8Vi8'-V. -: .. ,. ,., ~efm~ I p1ari R~Y.i8V/ _: Scharer, Karen 11/22/2004 1.00 . won9;_vyy11a::· 11.12.:i:1.20.o~. .. (1.205 Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Engiri8~~i_Qg .~0.Vi~W, P.ifll)it i ~i~~IR~·yf~i 'I" '• Wong, Wylie 11/23/2004 1.20 VV<>ng,\/Vyiie· . • ,11131.2ooii · ·. 3.10 Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review E~gi_n~~rJ,llg"!3'8V,i,~~ .. :. ·1 ~: f'f;!~i((e1_~h'.R8itj~W 1·,;., Wong, Wylie 11/23/2004 1.20 \1\/ong.:VVylie: . J.1/2.3/2004 (3 .. 10) Land Use Applications Rev Proje.ct Coordination _Lirl'd 0Se APP1ic:8tiOrl'ii·~~-\l 1.· '. ~ P.U~i'iC:'¢~5J~C(''.::::.:·:·. Scharer, Karen 11/23/2004 0.60 $i:ii~i~r.Raien 111_2.:i129.o~ 6.~~ Traffic Review Traffic Review 1:Erj9i,~·e_e'ril19'fR'13,V18W'i/\.::.-: ,'' ; '.':.r f'i'Pi8Ini'ifit)fi8ri'it~~Y!~~v::.; '''I"'"' P_errin, .. t:i.8:.~.r)'. 11/23/2004 1.00 ;·I, ;;I;],;tf"'.t!: i})'t_0~1i,YVY.!.i8_:'.:'.I :~1 j_~4/2_o·o.~::·:d -·, tf?O Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review .. J;ri9tH~~h.~i;LR~VJ~:VF::.·:: :::·:.:;r;·,.!.l'.Li.'i-: i1.!t!:Utf~l'IT!.itf.~1~KJ~i~i~W:!. t? ;·::.:;;;; :·1 :t:::::·; :"-i/:;r1r: ., Wong, Wylie 11/24/2004 2.00 ::n.wq:og·;:miJ~,\i, ·1: ·::::r _:: .. :_,1;1:t~4i?.99.4:.: ·:.:·,?::QQ> Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review · :.-:Jng(ry;~si'dg'j~-~Yi~~?1:t!:1?iij':'.1t:::~:::1.''..]'1'.('.!J~~l.~1f?.:Ef~.n'.):{~vr~:w}r?r·: Wong, Wylie 11/24/2004 1.50 .:r:r:.rr1:[fr:."1·w9ng·; ;WYH~:l',·"·"··· .i:,,1..11.~~1.2_~Q1,· -:_'.:(1:so> • soc- ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Summary of Charges and Payments --=--------------· Applicant: Description SBI DEVELOPING PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 cciimter Seh'ic~. Fees.•·.· ... Finance Charges H()URLYFEf.Land TJse]iianning' SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: L05MI042 L03P0015 L-MISC COMPLETE Amount $lo:f64 $9.81 • 'S:$688.28 $800.73 ·l'a) rncnts · · Description .. Check # <::µeek . . · 44~Q:ic: Transfer Transfer To L05Sl I 06 SUB TOT AL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Payee • :;; ;sBibEVELOPINGLi:c ....• 1.,,. "''''"'""'"'"""'"""" "'··••'··•'"''' •···· '''" Date Entered · :, 1613i2005 10/28/2005 Amount • ($1;842,QQ) $1,041.27 ($800.73) $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to ODES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate In effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. AU fees must be paid In full before DOES .. issue.s .Fin.al Approval, T.C.O, or C.O. . soc DDES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Hourly Charges Detail Applicant: SBI DEVELOPING Activity Number: PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 Project Number: Development Number: Perm it Type: Status: Function PR -Land Use Applications Review Task/Description_ Permit/ Plan Review, Permit/ Plan Review ' .,. .. _,_. 1· ·--'"" R.e..f!llit I Ria.~ Revie."' Meetings Subtotal PR TOTAL: Name Org Workday Dehkordi-Wisierlu~d. Fe;.esiiieh ·. }±6± o~h7/20f25-.. Dehkordi-Westerlund, Fereshteh 3464 08/17/2005 '!)<lhk,qrdi: westerly~d: f.~re.sht~)l 3.464 : 0~/1 ~a.§of Dehkordi-Westerlund, Fereshteh 3464 06/07/2005 Page I of I L05MI042 L03POOl5 L-MISC COMPLETE Hours o-.zs"·· 0.5 ... zc~ . 1.5 4.75 4.75 Amount . $36.23 $72.45 ··jji;fzj: $217.35 $688.28 $688.28 The hours shown above represent the actual hours of service charged on this permit to date. Hours worked that are covered by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly charges not covered by a base fee are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid In full before DDES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. -soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Summary of Charges and Payments Applicant: SB! DEVELOPING Activity Number: PO BOX 73790 Project Number: PUYALLUP, WA 98373 Development Number: Permit Type: 253 848 0820 Status: Description Couhtef ·~·~tvi~~1.F·~~~:: ,_:.: Finance Charges SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Description Check# Checklogid Payee Date Entered Check · · :4ifoi ' ·· 88444 . . . .. '. I;Bi DEVELOPING Luc · · 1olzi;12oos · SUBTOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Page I of I L05PCI 12 L03POOl5 CHANGE RET/WCI Amount $Toi6<i $1.03 $103.67 Amount . ($103.67) ($103.67) $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DOES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed.to the applicant. AHfees must be paid_ln_fuUbefore DOES Issues Final. Approval,. T.C.O. or C.O. soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Summary of Charges and Payments Applicant: SB! DEVELOPING PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 · Char!.!<:S Description 'Co~Ilf~r·sery,i¢~.fe~s ' 1 '.::J:. :.1.·;:: HOURLY FEE: Site Inspection SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Description ,,,,, ,,,,.,f Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: !':''···-,• ••· I"""'"'"'" !, ,.1 .... Page I of I L05PCI30 L03POOJ5 CHANGE COMPLETE Amount $2os:28' $970.84 $1,176.12 Amount ¢Heil<. Check# ..... ,C~~ckl~~i~ Payee Date Entered ,,.:_4 __ 1_ifs_,::_ ; ,,.i8sos6,'.ii'· • _,, •:safolivlii:.opfNi::iLt:0)::i1;;:,::i,,toiisi2oos', .. ,' ,_._,_, L,,,,,., ... ,"'""'"'" i,-i ,,,.,11 .. "''"'"''i''"' <>•··•·••···""'""' , .. ,..,~.-,,,wf, .. ,,,. ,,.,,,.,.1.,.,_.,,.l, .... ,, ... ,.,,.,,,,,., · ($l;§sfts) $478.16 Refund R0609571 2/24/2006 SUB TOTAL PAYMENTS: ($1,176.12) BALANCE: The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to ODES at the time of application. $0.00 For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid In full before ODES Issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 OakesdaJe Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Summary of Charges and Payments .---~-------------, Applicant: US LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOC. C/0 CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 22617 8TH DRE BOTHELL, WA 425-486-2563 Description :cOUJlter .s~JYt~e Ff~s ·:· .. .' ~ ..... ~,., ... ~ .;:·· .... ". ~~-:~-~:-~~· --~·~~:- HOURLY FEE: Building Site Plan Review HOUllYEEE·''El{ am,riH 'pjlli!Re\iiew'Pi i'!V'1'111, . . , .. ,,, ... ., •,,t .'.,,, '.•,rn,,g,,,.,.,.,..,, .. g,,,.,,.~'"""''''''"'-"''"'''\ .. , .. I 1C,l,1 •• ,., HOURLY FEE: Engineering Review SUB TOT AL CHARGES: Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: L03V0036 L03POOl5 SUBVAR GRANTED Amount $<i'i:1s· $138.00 -·'''''""''' •. :~1,?~§,40 $34.50 $2,036.65 Description Check# Checklogid Payee Date Entered Amount Check 431 '1 • • 1 ,', .•. 1 .• ·:_·::•jJ~_ LANrij:Jj,_y],:~6pM~1'ifi$$9C.1'·:~J/i. 11~003 - Transfer Transfer To L05SI 106 5/20/2005 SUB TOT AL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: ($2):iO.OO) $493.35 ($2,036.65) $0_00 -----~----------------~, The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the infonnation provided to DOES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, _T.C.O. or C.O. .,.--soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Summary of Charges and Payments Applicant: SB! DEVELOPING, LLC KURT WILSON PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 Chances Description Counter'Seivice Fees. . . ,,, "''"''' '''" .•. , ' "' ,,,, ,q,, ,, Deposit Based on Est Hrs HOURLY.l'EE:·siteinspection !' .,,, !; ' SUB TOTAL CHARGES: i'aymcnls · · Activity Number: Project Number: . Development Number: Permit Type: Status: ·-,-~-1 'i,1:·: I:'':> i'-' ·:· !) ,'i .'·: '•;'.ti·:' r°' Description Check # Checklogid Payee Date Entered check · · ·· ······ 43f:f · s:2339" . ,... . SBiDEVELOPiNGii'.c ........... , · 5/312005 SUB TOT AL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: -. -.... . . ' Page I of I L05SI040 LOIPOOI6 INSPECT PUNCHLST Amount ·• $102.64 $2,303.89 .· ..•. $594. I I $3,000.64 Amount ($3,000.64) ($3,000.64) $0.00 ··-·----------·----·-·-.. ---·-·-···--------... ·-·------·----------·-·--·----- The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DOES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. .-II SQC DDES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Hourly Charges Detail ~----------------------·-------·-·----------------, Applicant: SBI DEVELOPING, LLC KURT WILSON Activity Number: Project Number: PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 Development Number: Perm it Type: Function PM -Project Management Task/Description . Prc\ject Management•FeeEstimatini Subtotal PM Function SI -Site Inspection Task/Description Quality Control Review Name ·-···-· ·-·-·-. ·. Pray; Jeffrey. Name Status: Org Workday :3477 .03/.11/2005 Org Workday Pray, Jeffrey 3477 07/26/2006 ·· .,..TrafeF"fimb'':r',' I -.. -.... , . . ,;: 'i;' rc~e.l~rti; t[llioiiif ·::o 1 ij~·1(f_:,·0~1i312gp6 · Punch list Inspections Cheatum, Timothy 34 77 06/13/2006 PJhchli~tP~ep,if~Hd,rt ·:Fieici''' ''"''. ''. 'd,~.itul)l, Timlii~y: ,, 1 ,j47'f"' 67ii:ii'fo61; Punchlist Preparation -Field Cheatum, Timothy 3477 07/19/2006 Subtotal SI TOTAL: f;"" ,•'! L05SJ040 LOIP0016 INSPECT PUNCHLST Hours Amount 0.6 $86:94 0.6 $86.94 Hours Amount 0.25 $36.23 ... 0.75 . }i08.68 1.25 $181.13 . 9.5 i $72.45 0.75 $108.68 3.5 $507.17 4.1 $594.tt The hours shown above represent the actual hours of service charged on this permit to date. Hours worked that are covered by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly charges not covered by a base fee are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Summary of Charges and Payments --=--------------· Applicant: SB! DEVELOPING, LLC ATTN: RICHARD BARBER P.O. BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 97373 (253) 848-0820 '?!script~~n ... ~ --···· _ Counter Service Fees . .. Deposit Based on Est Hrs H0.0~1Y l'Eif J:lcmg />ro~~ssinf .. HOURLY FEE: Site Inspection SUB TOTAL CHARGES: 'i'ay111ents Description Check# Check .. . 4421 Checkh>gid ....• Payee . SBI.DEVELOPING,LLC SUB TOT AL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Date Entered .......... .-. 6/2/2005 , L05Sil07 L03P0015 INSPECT PENDING Amount $_1_02.64 $2,463.3~ $72.45 $72.45 $2,710.84 Amount ($2,710.84) ($2,710.84) ($0.00) The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DOES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C .. o ... or C.O. • soc DOES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Hourly Charges Detail Applicant: SBI DEVELOPING, LLC ATI'N: RICHARD BARBER P.O. BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 97373 (253) 848-0820 Function FG -Financial Guarantees Management Task/Description Finaricia1Guara11i~esMgt. .. & &forifrorin'i Subtotal FG . Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: . Name Org Workday Ora.:.;: siacy' 341 s ·0§1oii1200:s ···· · ········ · -··· Function SI -Site Inspection Task/Description Drainage & Utility Inspections Name Young, Jay Org 3477 Workday 02/28/2006 Subtotal SI TOTAL: Page I of I L05SII07 L03P0015 INSPECT PENDING Hours . 'o.s 0.5 Hours 0.5 0.5 1.0 Amount .... fii.45 $72.45 Amount $72.45 $72.45 $144.90 The hours shown above represent the actual hours of service charged on this permit to date. Hours worked that are covered by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly charges not covered by a base fee are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees_ must be paid in full before DOES Issues Final Approval, T.C.O, or C.O. -S0C ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Summary of Charges and Payments ~-'-------------- Applicant: SBI DEVELOPING, LLC KURT WILSON PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 , (;h,lr!!t:S Description Coun'ter Service Fees « ' - Deposit Based on Est Hrs HOURLY FEE: siiJ'i'rtspectioii' SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: L05Sl039 LOIP0016 INSPECT PENDING Amount ,_:._ ·-$.102.64 $2,702.38 .. , $195.62 $3,000.64 l'ayrncnts · Description Check# Check · · ' 4324 · Checklogid 82325 . . SUBTOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Payee :'sa1 I:>EVELOPINGLLC Date Entered 5/3/2005 . Amount ($3,000.64) ($3,000.64) ($0.00) The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to ODES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit Issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before ODES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C,O, , . ' 'soc Page 1 of 1 ODES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Applicant: SB! DEVELOPING, LLC KURT WILSON PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 Function PM· Project Management Task/Description . .. . rerinii/iifan Re~ie'iVi Project Management Fee Estimating Subtotal PM Function SI -Site Inspection Hourly Charges Detail Name . <J'ray, J~ffr~y Pray, Jeffrey Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Org.. Workday 3411. :o:iii11200§ . . --··········' ,,.......... . ., ... , .. ' 3477 03/11/2005 Task/Description Name Org Workday Communications Stafr'Coordinaiioii :field. . Cheaiu\\i, Timothy 3477-0i/18/'.1006 Subtotal SI TOTAL: L05SI039 LOIPOOI6 INSPECT PENDING Hours Amount Q.25 $Jf:2j 0.6 $86.94 0.85 $123.17 Hours Amount 0.5 $72.45 0.5 $72.45 1.35 $195.62 ------------·------------. ___ . ---. ' .. _ . _. --·------------. ·----. ------· -·---- The hours shown above represent the actual hours of service charged on this permit to date. Hours worked that are covered by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly charges not covered by a base fee are charged at the rate In effect at the time of service. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. AU fees must be paid in fullbefore ODES Issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Project Name: NICHOLS PLACE Project Location: KURT WILSON SBI DEVELOPING LLC PO BOX 73790 PUYALUP WA 98373 Project Management Statement Statement Date: 8/9/2006 Customer: Penni!#: L05FR042 Project#: L03P0015 Parcel Number: 1423059058 Penn it Type: FINAL Status: APPROVED Page I of3 Project Management Statement Managed Project Hours Budget: Total Hours Worked (see Hours Detail): Total Budgeted Hours Remaining: Fixed Fees: Description · Issaquah Seti 'Dist'411 . School MPS Admin Fee Counter Servicel;eesif: Recording Fees Total Fixed Fees: .,. __ _ ·l:J',. Managed Project Hours Budget: Total Managed Rroject B~dget: .· • :·-.:, .• ,;. i", '. ',: •:1.'' . ·,::::· Total AmounfDeferred: . • ·.: i,<if,' h AMOUNT DUE.AT APPLICATION: Pa ments: Date Posted Payment Type . 8/16/2005 ." ~ .. Check . .. ..: .. 8/23/2005 Check 11/1/2005 Check Total Payments Received: I , • .. ' 1·: 'T' d, •.. I ... C::~lc,>gl[)_ ;CURRENT (Excludes Deferred Amount): .Total Balance: ' Deferred 32.00 21.25 10.75 Due Now Amount $54:s5e:oo . $65.00 · ' • $5:4,956:0o : . · ' '' , $65.00 ,·: ii $2os.2s1\ ;;.:r r $98.00 $55,324.28 $4,636.80 • $s!i,esios ;' ',,,,-., .. ., $55,021.00 :·' " ,,:· $55 1 ;021.00 ' ' ' . . Check# ·.···_4048. 4630 ... "4832 • !-.• $0.00 ·, , . "$205.28 $98.00 $303.28 $4,636.80 $4,940.08 ($59,961.08) $0.00 Page 2 of3 Disclaimer Language for Permits under Project Management Based on permit information submitted by the applicant, the Department of Development and Environmental Services has determined the amount of review fees for the subject application. The fees shown do not include ancillary permit fees, project-related mitigation fees, or any other fees that are passed through to the applicant from other agencies or as part of the project's environmental review. Fee estimates are based on Information submitted to DDES by the applicant prior to finalization of the permit application. In addition, estimates are determined by utilizing historical data gathered from projects of similar type, size, and scope. DDES's fee estimate is subject.to revision under conditions including, but not limited to, the following: 1) Unknown or undisclosed site or project issues 2) Changes in the project 3) Incomplete information from applicant 4) Errors in applicant information or submittal 5) County code fee changes 6) Appeals Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. All fees must be paid in full before DDES Issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. For billing questions, please call 206-296-6659 -. Hours Detail Function •.. Proje~ Manager11ent Proje_ct M_anageme~t i ~-~fin~}J~-~VJ&,W~_ -.. --- Final Review -_:''Fi/1_81_R8Y:iew_:···'.·.:· Project Management ;;,:,:.f.Jr~(R.~YJ~~-: ;·· .··", .,,1., .. Project Management "Fl_n~.l..8~Y.i~Yt'.: "": -. , ... Addressing Services Permit Number: L05FR042 Statement Date: Task Name Workdate •• , •• Proie£t .R.oori:1Jri~.iiiin •• .., ... :.:. , ;~ ::J1gieni, il•iriio~d ,=: . ·.· :@712005 . Project Coordination ,.,,. Florent, Raymond 8/30/2005 :pe·m,1t(P18rrR8VleW ---··-··-... , ..... __ . ___ •_1 ··--· •• _Simmons,_Patrick-___ --. :rai3f/2005 Permit/ Plan Review Simmons, Patrick 9/1/2005 1_:'_:T:}>er.n:,RiO'.i~-n'}{e~H~W·:,·i · _ _ i .. -.. .,.: •. '.-~.,,.,, ·:"":~::;.;.~~·::::);Jm·mon~;}~atrfo·(~~ jjf2l20Qtr:·· Project Management Fee Estimating Floren!, Raymond 9/13/2005 /i'./JLi;}i'.1.~i.E~~~j,if[Ef~'f.B'.ij,Y,Jij,~.:..i}:0.i::':'?},lT.:::; '} I ;'I;' . ;i?.::~:r ,;:;·:·L§@.!fo?~6fJifrJ~~·' .: .91~1° 12,·qps Project Coordin.ation Florent, Raymond 10/18/2005 . . " ·:·.~ .. :::P.~ITT11f(RT~.ci".t{~Y1-~i ''"' , ... 1,h, ·c:·Jfil'.im:~fo~',):~I~)~~k. JOJ.19~i0Qs', Addressing Fessenden, Janise 10/20/2005 . p'iri81 'R8VleW"·· . . •• ·--, '.IC'-" "P8miit (P1a·~ ·R·evi~vr::· . ·s_iTJ)!TIOns:):)atifCf"". fO.ii8(2q65 Final Review . ''f:i'ri8i'R~VJEIW'" · Final Review lincliJ~Bvle_w· . Addressing Services Fina"! RevieW · --,, · Permit/ Plan Review Simmons, Patrick 11/1/2005 '']'''!'!'! I 'I '! It' i"' i_,Cf~~.liif¢.~.b.fr~J 'f~~·yi~i&~ '. I'" r·· l''.''l"t ' .. ~'"'.' '":""''. 1 :' S~fid8fS'/:~~rn.ef''" ·11tf12g·os ' Permit/ Plan Review Simmons, Patrick 11/2/2005 '1,:,; :.J{~fri,.[{l·P.1~n ;·Re\f,i.E~\,V)°;, , ,' 1 , s1.rnrnon·~;. -~~.fr[t:k '... . -t j 1~!2.QPt Parcel Reconfiguration Fessenden, Janise 11/7/2005 "tluali\y Confrol Review Sandeis, James -11/8/2005 Total Hours Worked: Page 3 of3 8/9/2006 Hours ... ,Oa25 0.50 6 .• 0Q 2.00 ··.rso 1.00 2,00 0.25 ·o'..so. 0.75 1.00 1.50 .,_0.5_0 0.50 (25 1.25 0.50 21.25 .. soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Summary of Charges and Payments Page I of I ~---------------Applicant: SBI DEVELOPING, LLC KURT WILSON PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 Chan.1.1:s Description :~9ullter,.~ifYiC~J~~s ··...:, :::; ii:: HOURLY FEE: Building Plan Check SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Description Check ... Transfer Check # Checklogid 3953 , ' i' ' ' .... "" ,,, ;.._ . Transfer To L04V0056 Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Payee ••· · safoEvEi:i:iPiNG, t:Cc · .. .sa,w,••••••'•wC, ••' "''"' ~·'"'·' "'', ,,,,, ,-._-, Date Entered 12/1/2004 I-~·. ' ~ • ~· 3/2/2005 '·.'' ,. "' '"T' .. ,. >;'! ,·• '.'.:·:'I''·!',,,.,.,.'' ... ,."""Tl'' 'o'-'· ·'·!.'''·' ",.,,.,., ,.,.,., .. , . .,.) •.. , r p'. -., '• ,. '"·"''"'"'"'"'••·, .. l'I '' .,,., ... •"' "'"'"I ""''''"''"'"' ''""'"•••~-· . ., .. t ''' ITransrer:::,., <<;/.:·:-:1:d;1·<rrarisfe:r,:ro·1'.:04sns_s l,(i!: 1:"1 :e:·!:"!:"!J!f!lt .. :;: :·!ii;!, :i-c:·: '>'i:·: 1i:3t212oos:i · SUB TOT AL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: L04PCl86 LOIPOOl6 CHANGE COMPLETE Amount •. :(26~,2~ $434.70 $639.98 Amount +---'--·· ($1,654.28) $485.42 • E:isis' ($639.98) $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the infonnation provided to ODES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate In effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. -.. . -.. ''" . ,_ ---. ._.. . -~ -,,_ soc DDES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055~1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Hourly Charges Detail ----------------- Applicant: SB! DEVELOPING, LLC KURT WILSON PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA98373 253 848 0820 Function PE -Building Plans Examination Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Task/Description Name Org Workday R~yisibnii".r6t'isijrig CT i,iit~ow;'.tt§i\Jghitigi 1](' :r:' 3~31: L i21i\i72po4 Revision Processing Chow, Hou-Ching 3431 12/06/2004 Subtotal PE TOTAL: L04PCl86 LOIP0016 CHANGE COMPLETE Hours z:o ' 1.0 3.0 3.0 Amount ·$2s?:80. $144.90 $434.70 $434.70 The hours shown above represent the actual hours of service charged on this permit to date. Hours worked that are covered by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly charges not covered by a base fee are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before ODES issues Final • · T.C.O. or C.O. soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Summary of Charges and Payments Applicant: SBI DEVELOPING, LLC KURT WILSON PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 Description C~unier ~ervi_c~ Fe~s : : '. ·:;,;: .. , HOURLY FEE: Engineering Plan Review ----------------, Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: ·~ ·-_, ..... _ .... , .. , ... , ........ -~ . .• ,.,., ... • : .. :1' • L04PC185 LOIP0016 CHANGE COMPLETE Amount ~205,28_ $6,621.93 HOUR[)q•~E-E:·:s1tt{iflS"j)~BHO~rr::r: ,'";'!';·, ,: .. :"> : :\:;:~~:<1:r:;:~:·:·:::T~I~''!.; :·i iTJ."!,'~>';l'l"I/!'; .. i f')Ti'!!·:' '::· :.:·1 ::, ·: ~'''1'i"'~''."IF" .. , ... ,, ··• sT,iisI.si SUB TOT AL CHARGES: , ... ,. •1;·, Description Check Transfer Check Transfer Check# .. Checkl?gid 395_3 , ·':;' Transfer From L04Sll 88 . _4004_ Transfer To L04Sll 88 SUB TOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Payee Date Entered .. s13,(i5EVEt;OPING,I.J,c . . •. Jilihoo:i . 12/16/2004 . -"·· ---. 12/2_0/2004 3/2/2005 $8,479.08 Amount ($(65f28) ... ,. ($4,274.5~) ($4, 1_58.6:1) $1,608.40 ($8,479.08) ($0.00) The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DDES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DDES Issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. . soc DDES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055. J 219 August 9, 2006 Page I of2 Hourly Charges Detail ~---------------~-----~---------- Applicant: SBI DEVELOPING, LLC KURT WILSON Activity Number: Project Number: PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 Development Number: Function ER -Engineering Review Task/Description Permit/ Plan Review · · ' Permit/ Plan Review . Permit/ l'l~n,Revie,v Permit Type: Status: Name Org Workday Che~[Ulll, TimoiliY •.••. ,, 3477 ::)21§1i~iiiif ' ' '·,,' Wong, Wylie 3473 11/17/2004 ::~.;~g; fyyii{ ..... , ..... )4ft::I17Js1~091: Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie . Permit/Piah il~v.iew .• .... -. -. . \V()ng,)v'ylle 3473 11/19/2004 34 73 . ) i12j1~094 " Permit I Plan Review · Permii/Plan·Review ,· . Permit/ Plan Review : Permii1j>l~Revi~w. Permit I Plan Review ·. l'eritiii/Piari Review Permit/ Plan Review ·· Permit/·Plan Review Wong, Wylie · Woni, Wx11 •. Wong, Wylie · , · .·•·• Wilng;·wyJf-•· Wong, Wylie Wong, ~\fie, Wong, Wylie Worg,Wyli~ 3473 11/23/2004 ':J'47j ''il/23/2004 ' · "'" .,., ... ',.-,I~', .... :.,,.,' "~-,~,· ""'·· ,;"""'' 3473 11/24/2004 . -3473' i l/30i2QQ( ... 3473 12/02/2004 · · '.)47J 12ioi;/200:i. 34 73 12/06/2004 }1'1{: 1}!6iZ:ioo{ ·. · Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 3473 12/0712004 Permit 1.• Plan Review:' . wong· wyiie . ·• .. ' . . .... -,. '" . ' ' . . ',, . ' '' 3-47j','~: ·12/07/2004-: Permit I Plan Review Permit i Plan Revi~w Permit I Plan Review Wong, Wylie 34 73 12/08/2004 wong;wyiie::-. -·}17i_ .1210812004_ , Wong, Wylie 3473 12/09/2004 Permit/PlanReview.. '.' W9ng,Wylje:: ;: ,, ' )'41{:: "ii709li004 - Permit/ Plan Review Permit/Plan Review··· . . ' ,,,,' ...... . Wong, Wylie 3473 12/10/2004 \Vong; W,ylie Wong, Wylie ' ·_3473· 121j:ihoo.i 3473 12/13/2004 Permit / Plan Review Quality Control Revi~w .... ... . ' ·"-... ' " Field Check . ~.:.·sa11de .. r~:,··1ii~-~~ .. ' :-~.· · Cheatum, Timothy ..• 3473 : 'i27i3/Z,004i 3477 12/07/2004 Subtotal ER Function PM -Project Management Task/Description . Pt;rmit iplan'Rev.iew Permit/ Plan Review Permit/ Plan Revit;w. Permit/ Plan Review Name Org Workday . 'Pray; .i.~tire.x ~ 34'11..::I21oj/~tjo4' Pray, Jeffrey 3477 12/07/2004 · r··. Im · ''.ii11.·.1.·.·. i:iios12004 ' ' r~x,' .e ... ' ey Pray, Jeffrey 3477 12/09/2004 ,1··· •r ,~ • ,<-1 .. L04PC185 LOIPOOl6 CHANGE COMPLETE Hours Amount · 3'.i5 , ... . $4j0.93' 2.5 $362.25 -. -~-····-... 2:~ . $3~~-2? 3.5 $507.15 JI. ..$507)5 3.1 $449.19 i.i $173.88 2.0 $289.80 LO . $144.90 2.0 $289.80 Io $4,34,70 2.5 $362.25 0.5 $72.45 2.5 $362.25 ~··----· ~·- 1.5 $217.35 3.5 $507. 15 0.7 $IOL43 4.0 $579.60 0,5 $72.45i 2.7 $391.23 ' 0.5 $72.45 2.0 $289.80 .15 $72.45 0.5 $72.45 49.45 $7,165.31 Hours Amount '' 0.3, .. ·. .J43..4.?. 3.5 $507.15 2.0 $289.80 0.4 $57.96 . . .• soc Page 2 of2 Task/Description Name Org Workday Hours Amount r~;;J~ci/0ari'agem,e'.ni~eeJ:is1iniil1iiiJ/'' · ''' : ~r~y,/Je'.ffrey I t'J4zzf!'ifg/Q~L~Q/11 ,: :, e1:ur, , ,. o.s -: .. , ....... , ... ···:,·,· ·· ' Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 3477 12/02/2004 0.3 c.· .. ··.6. /n.' /n.' •. '.~.n ... i.t. at.i.o_···.n.''.s. ,_;_ S. ·.t. a .. ·.r.f_·• .. c.·.o.·.'o.·.t .. ·:.d .. lti.a.'.t.lo.'.'.n.' .. i' .. '! ... · :\T•ii!i'ii'J>ra';.'J''ff'r" . ':.: 113477" .''J!2103/200~' . ,ti''· .• .... Y, ~-ey,•,11\! ..•.. ::;:: ............ Ci' · Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 3477 12/09/2004 Subtotal PM TOTAL: I t:9~ij·.'.:::? 0.4 7.65 57.1 $43.47 : s.iii:73: $57.96 $1,108.49 $8,273.80 -~ The hours shown above represent the actual hours of service charged on this permit to date. Hours worked that are covered by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly charges not covered by a base fee are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. Fees that have been p_osted prior to per_ mit issua.nce will b.e collected a_ .t th. at.tim.e .. Fees s. u_bs·e· qu.ently posted will. be. _billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in_ full ,before DDES issues _Final Approval, T.C.O. or c,o. . . ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-I219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Summary of Charges and Payments ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~------=-~~-~--~~"--~~~~~~~~~~~~~, Applicant: SB! DEVELOPING LLC KURT WILSON PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 Description counter service Feei . HOURLY FEE: Land Use Planning SUB TOTAL CHARGES: 'l•ay1m:nls Descript_ion .. Check# Checklogid Transfer.. . fr~nif~riironfL!)jR,JiQj8 Transfer Transfer To L04SR024 Check ,, 4039 . , ,787,70,,, "'"''P,'"'""~', SUB TOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Activity Number: L04MI037 . Project Number: LOIPOOI6 Development Number: Permit Type: L-MISC Status: COMPLETE Amount .I/ $1()2,~1' $1,195.43 $1,298.07 Payee . Date Entered Amount ($828;00) $145.76 ($615.83) '"''l' W"-''"''.'''''e '''"T'r··, .. ,. • " ""' ··· · , .•... , .'"', ·:· •w·,.···,•c'">rr~r-·" • ,SBI DEVELOPING LLC: ·· ·· 1!2hoo4 · 9/10/2004 Iill/20.05 ($1,298.07) $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to ODES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit Issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before ODES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. -.• soc Page I of I •_! DDES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Hourly Charges Detail ~---------------, Applicant: SB! DEVELOPING LLC KURT WILSON PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 Function PR -Land Use Applications Review Task/Description Name . i>~rmit .. Ti>faii. iivJf"'···• ··: · · ':·c••.·.· .' 13_uif;f,ii~~ :I·· Permit I Plan Review Bull, Trishah . P.<)nnit/ Pia~ i{evfew --· : ·13~Ji, TrlshJlti -· Permit/ Plan Review Bull, Trishah '.:,: Pern1it, /;r1a~1ReyJ~~·,'.,' i·i·::tiJB~(i;,;ff.~·~hflfo:}:1:,]:; Permit I Plan Review Bull, Trishah Project Coorc:li.natio11 B~il. Trish-ii. . Public Contact Bull, Trishah Subtotal PR TOTAL: Org 3464 3464 3464 3464 Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Workday qz/0§1200~: , . 07/12/2004 . 07/16/2004 ... ' ~ " ........ , .......... , .... . 08/25/2004 :·:··,346~{,,":·;·::)ii/i 16/2604.:.··,·;;::·:, '1 ., ; > ,.e>./,,,.,, t,,I sl»H '"'•U, ,. , ,,t,f,.,.,.~.,.,.:{,, ':: /,,: /,,.:»>1.:Jb, 3464 11/30/2004 'j4i;4 i270212004:· 3464 11/16/2004 L04MJ037 L01P0016 L-MISC COMPLETE Hours 1:0 1.0 J.9. 0.5 LL,<ie. 2.0 1.5 0.25 8.25 8.25 Amount .. $j44.90 $144.90 . $!44.90 $72.45 s)4}CJ0 $289.80 ···$217.35' $36.23 $1,195.43 $1,195.43 The hours shown above represent the actual hours of service charged on this permit to date. Hours worked that are covered by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly charges not covered by a base fee are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid In full before .D.DES_ issu.~sFln~I, Jl.p~roval, T.C.O .. or C.O .. · .... ___ ____ ... ~soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 OakesdaJe Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Summary of Charges and Payments Applicant: Descrip_tion Finance Ch~ges SBI DEVELOPMENT KURT WILSON PO BOX 7390 PUYALLUP WA 98373 253-848-0820 HOURLY FEE: Critical area review SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Description :Transfer . Check Check # Checklogid -.. Transfer Fro,1)1 AO~P9 tfii 4394 82929 , -.-i" 4789 , ., -, 88246''/:li"i _ SUB TOT AL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: . -.1 .............. ·-' L04Gll43 LOJPOOJ6 G-INSPCT MONITOR Amount $5.07 $869.43 $874.50 Payee Date Entered .· .: ~= _ _ _ ·--'-, _ ,.?I.I 0/2004 Amount -($36.23) ($36.23) ·-. -, ($soio,i)' SB! DEVELOPING LLC 5/19/2005 1SBJ DEVELOPING'LLC' Ti':,1.::····16/:foi:foos '' ($874.50) $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DDES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit Issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be_ paid in_full before_DDES issues Final App_roval, T.C.O. or C.O. soc DOES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Hourly Charges Detail --------------·.-'----·-----·-------, Applicant: SBI DEVELOPMENT KURT WILSON PO BOX 7390 PUYALLUP WA 98373 253-848-0820 Function SM -Sensitive Area Monitoring Task/Description . p.,imit(Plan Review Penni!/ Plan Review Pennit/Pian Review Pennit / Plan Review . ~etmit i i>iah lleview Pennit / Plan Review .-. permit/ rl11n Revie,"' .-__ -. Name . _ , $fari.~t;\is,a '. Brandt, Lisa .. J. · -~·~ia_Q~!~·IiiB· ·:;··· Brandt, Lisa •· •--· sfan~~-i)s,t •. Brandt, Lisa ;_i;iran~t, ((sa '. Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Perm it Type: Status: Org Workday )fio . ·•-•osi26(2Qof ........ ____ -·- 3470 03/01/2005 ······347_9·-.. :-osiI6iioos>: : ,, ·•• 34 70 08/16/2005 3410 ·· ·:-osiii120.o? · 3470 08/30/2005 3470 -· P,?10112005 Penni!/ Plan Review Pennit/ Plru{Review Penni!/ Plan Review Field C::lieck · Brandt, Lisa 34 70 09/09/2005 Subtotal SM TOTAL: ~ra11dt, t;iia .. -. /347(! -.-· 9~7i4ii9:o·f - Brandt, Lisa 3470 09/14/2005 Brnndt,Lisa .3470 '09/08/2005 L04GI143 LOIPOOl6 G-INSPCT MONITOR Hours Amount ,,_025 $36.23 0.25 $36.23 ·o.5 $72.45 0.5 $72.45 0.5 ·--~72,45 0.25 $36.23 · -(i:25 -$36.23 0.25 $36.23 0.75 •-sio8.68 1.0 $144.90 1'.s $217.35 6.0 $869.43 6.0 $869.43 i ,,,,,. -----·····-···-·---·-· -·--------------·-·-·-··----·-·--·--·---. -·---··---·---·-··-·-·--·----····' ... -.. --·-·----·---~- The hours shown above represent the actual hours of service charged on this pennit to date. Hours worked that are covered by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly charges not covered by a base fee are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before ODES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. -····· .. ··· -·-····--·------·""'""'"'""""'"""'"" ________ ----•-·-•-·-·--···-------·-···························-------····-················-------··········"· ........ . . --········ ············--~----··········"·'·---'-. soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Summary of Charges and Payments Page I of I ----------------, Applicant: SBI DEVELOPMENT· KURT WILSON Activity Number: P.O. BOX 7390 Project Number: PUYALLUP, WA 98373 Development Number: Permit Type: 253/848-0820 Status: CharL>.es Description 'ar&c1r crri oV s:oi: ': To Ord/Cir Counter Service SUB TOTAL CHARGES: l'av1m:111s Description Check # Checklogid Payee Date Entered check ,' b690' .:.;[r .:7.1s21 :,:.:: Ir{ saftsi.ivEi:.oPMENTi-i'i,fi · ···s14i2004 SUB TOT AL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: L04GF042 LOIPOOl6 FOREST GRANTED Amount . . $2)l98.00 $205.28 $3,103.28 Amount ... : ( ($3,103.28) ($3,103.28) $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DDES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to _the applicant._ AU fees mu~ be pa~. i~_f_ull before DDES iss_ues Final A~proval, T.C.0. or C.O. soc DDES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Applicant: SB! DEVELOPMENT -KURT WILSON P.O. BOX 7390 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253/848-0820 Function GA -Grading/Clearing Review Task/Description Name ','. ;c:t>Aiu'ifatidq:,:.;·;:);:: -::::.:\::i::/:pe:a~~Oif{jOit: Subtotal GA TOTAL: Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Page I of I L04GF042 LOIPOOl6 FOREST GRANTED Amount >$000' 1.0 1.0 $0.00 $0.00 l ~ehours sho;,...n above represent the actual hours of service charged on this permit to date. Hours worked that are overed by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly charges not covered by a base fee are harged at the rate in effect at the time of service. ees that have bee·n· po.sled prior to permit issuance. will be collected at t ... h. a. t time .. F. ees subsequen.tly posted will be . lied to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. ·-·--------- .. -, . < < • soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of2 Summary of Charges and Payments Applicant: U S LAND DEVELOPMENT P.O. BOX 22200 SEATTLE WA 981220200 7261445 Description Counters.;r"vice Fees . . ... ,, . " ' ' . '" ' " . "'" • "·"·"' ' I.I >I I: .. ,', HOURLY FEE: Building Site Plan Review HOURLY FEE: Engineering Plan)levi~w , · SUB TOT AL CHARGES: Description Suspense AccOunt Check Transfer· Check # ChecklogidP ,1,;,,, . , I' 277 48976 · ... Transfer To .A04P0119 SUB TOT AL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Activity Number: L02V0024 Project Number: L01P0016 , Development Number: Permit Type: Status: .. 1.t'D. ' ., ···.'.!Y.'i.·"' ayee -·usLANDDEVELOPMENT··· ASSQCIA TE§.• ' ;.'< . US LAND DEVELOPMENT .. ' ' -... '1:.,: ' '\'' f ·, ' SUBVAR GRANTED Date Entered 4/15/2002 - 6/5/2002 7/6/2004 . Amount • $93,50 $66.00 $1;722.60 $1,882.10 Amount . ($1,413.50) .. .. ($660.0_0) . $191.40, ($1,882.10) $0.00 soc Page 2 of2 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DOES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid In full before .DDES Issues Fl_nal App_roval, T.C.O. or C.O. .. .. soc ODES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Hourly Charges Detail Applicant: U S LAND DEVELOPMENT Activity Number: P.O. BOX 22200 Project Number: Page I of I L02V0024 LO!P00!6 SEA TILE WA 981220200 Development Number: 7261445 Function ER -Engineering Review Task/Description · Permit I rian ~_i,vie"w· ·· ······ • ·-·· ·· Perm it Type: Status: Name Org Workday ~erg"")';Mark .... ·. ·· ·· · J<i1:i Q4/ _1512_0.9~ . Permit/ Plan Review Bergam, Mark 34 73 04/24/2002 PerD)it ill~v Review . · . , , ,·Berg~; Mai:k. ..•. · :J47I ·'· .. Q~/Q2/2QQ:2 , ,.,.,, Permit/ Plan Review Bergam, Mark 34 73 l 0/08/2002 Permiti•Pl~~Re;i;;w,: ,, · · • B~rg~iMai:k. l0i\i/i3~,73•_;'l<i/09/200:i=,:· · ·• Permit/ Plan Review Bergam, Mark 3473 10/14/2002 PCrinI~: ;:~fa~1.R~1yiew·'.· :,<:··1::'·r:: , .. 1'. 1::·.I·~ ')3-'~·rgrui;_~:·M~i? ·.::::h::.t~:~··> 3_4'ffi:Tr1q1(Sf}OQt··-~~·.,·, 1~·~""' · Permit I Plan Review Bergam, Mark 3473 10/17/2002 Permitij'>ian',il:ev[~w' '. i ·: .•. I •• B.frgl'm,. if irk; .... :· =j47f . i 0/22/2002 '. ....• . ... Permit I Plan Review Cheshier, Beth 3473 04/11/2002 . ··Qu __ ality·,·_co_··.n. ·tr __ ·o_" I R .. ··_e .. v.iew_···_·,·,: . ····. ·.s .. · .. ao.··· __ 'ct .. e.··_,r,·_·s.·.·_·,·_j __ a. _m_.·.· .. e.·.-.s.· .. ··, , . ' 3473 . 05/09/2002 •. . ..... . , , I.CL',,,,, , '"' ,,,, -~'"'" " ,,,,,."''•"", , "' '''"'I,, b, , I Quality Control Review Sanders, James 3473 10/17/2002 '' Field Check ' . ,.: ' ' Bergam: Mai"k·, ' 134 ii., .[ 05/03hoi>2 .. Subtotal ER Function SN -Site Plan Review Task/Description Variance Review Subtotal SN TOTAL: Name Chan, James Org 3434 Workday 10/17/2002 SUBVAR GRANTED Hours .... 1 .. 0. 0.75 ..... .0.c5 .... 0.25 ....... 1-:0.-'. 1.5 3.0 .. 0.5 J.5. 0.25 ·o:3 0.5 2.0 13.05 Hours 0.5 0.5 13.55 Amount .... Jl;J2_.Q() $99.00 ,·/ J§6_.oo $33.00 :s132.oo $198.00 J:i9{()0 $66.00 $198.00 $33.00 . $J~,6Q $66.00 $264,00 $1,722.60 Amount $66.00 $66.00 $1,788.60 ,, ... :" ... ___ ., ___ ,.,__ ··;_.,~,--. ·· ... --.. : .• _,-, .. ·: .. · .. ---··· ·.·"···_.-:· ":, ,.,, .... -.. _ ... _ "' '" "~ ·-.... :···· .. ., .. ""'''' -. ... .. . ....... "... ... . . "''' -. ,.. --. ··- The hours shown above represent the actual hours of service charged on this permit to date. Hours worked that are covered by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly charges not covered by a base fee are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the appli~ant. All fe~~-m...':'_st b<:._P_ald _in_ fuU before DDES issues Final Approval,T.C.O. or C.O. i ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of2 Summary of Charges and Payments Applicant: SBI DEVELOPING, LLC KURT WILSON PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 Description ,Counter Service Fees , .. ,,,, .,. ",, '""'' ,J,,,, .... ''" ., : ,,,,,, ...... ,:,,,:,.1., .• ;"i .. ,1 ... :.1 •.. ' Finance Charges (,IQ\JRLYF!;E:Apile,i1~;(us~);;9f lli:de)Y: .•..... HOURLY FEE: Critical area review HOU~).; X,f i,if'io:iig~~~~[ngp1;µ\tevJei · , .. HOURLY FEE: Engineering Review HOURLY F~E: Env, lrripa~t St~t~tner\ ,;' HOURLY FEE: Land Use Planning HOURLY:FEE:·S§PA App~als . , : , ,; ,.. ,, '·' HOURLY FEE: Services & Fees-UPD SUB TOTAL CHARGES: ir · ' .. , ., ' ~--------------, Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Perm it Type: Status: ,.r-. •. '1 "'''1.,.,, ._' ' ""'"' ,,,} I~.,.,' L03RE038 LOIPOOl6 REVISION PRELAPPR Amount $97.75 $]6,97 .. _}j44)o' $313.96 . :·~i,3~9.1.~ $362.25 $43,47 $8,381.45 ,$3~0.,52, $103.50 $12,193.90 Description Check# Checklogid Payee Date Entered Amount 'check ' 4&t'' ., ' ,.... .. I u~J:A1'/pi5EVEQ)PM~1'ifXss9c;_' •. '.)oiii290I: ~($j;<!77:i5) Check 709 66232 U.S. LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES 12/5/2003 ($676.20) check .. i:i} '61216 '0I(AN.'i:>'D~YE[QPijif,NfXgs·oc;JXfE,s· 17~200~:.:· (Si;9~{\oY Check 734 68161 US LAND DEVELOPMENT 2/11/2004 ($1,131.60) ~~~:t , , '~~'4 .. :!:tr~-: :::J:. ·, " -.. 0tLi~!~~itttit1tiTA~~ii~~¥! :·!;f~t~~-·: . ($f$[itJ!i Check . 1025 7o6si '". .tf~~AND bE,YELOl'MJ:N.f'' .,\ ,.",, . s;i;/2664 ······· ($fss.37) Check 1011 71638 US LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES 6/7/2004 ($347.76) Check 3~22 , . , , . . . . . . "usi,Ais:Q i5EVELOPMENTAsso¢ . '. . 771i2004 ($82&~oo)' Transfer Transfer To L04MI037 7/2/2004 $828.00 ·check 1036 121g~ ... . -. " :QsIANi? o,EvELb~1y1~N'r ... 1is12664 ($767,?8) Transfer Transfer From A04PO 119 9/10/2004 ($362.25) SUB TOT AL PAYMENTS: ($12,193.90) I 'soc BALANCE: The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the provided to DOES at the time of application. Page 2 of2 $0.00 For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate In effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be -~)~~-~to th~}_l'!'lic~~t._ AU fees m~_st be p~~~~~J!c~~oreJDES is~uesFinal Ap1>roval, T.C:.O. o! C.O,~·-~~---~=~ ' 'SOC DOES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of3 Hourly Charges Detail ~---------------, Applicant: SBI DEVELOPING, LLC KURT WILSON PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 Function AP -LU/Subd/SEPA Appeals Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Task/Description Peimit/Pfan R.evi~w - Hearings / Legal Process Name Org Workday ·-Ianiiey/&foien' -·. 3464 "os7ioizo§4 Whittaker, Bruce 3473 05/10/2004 Heru-ings , --,,,; ·,i,anli(ey:i<ris'il!ii,/ , _____ .•·;3_~6.4'i osJ031~0<i. : Hearings :•"" . "''"'":.: '"I , HearingSi Langley, Kristen 3464 05/03/2004 -1 ,. ~aiigiex'.,l(rls,i,,fr ?: _:_,34;;4 x_· .o.siiii12004 Hearings Scharer, Karen 3464 05/10/2004 Subtotal AP Function ER -Engineering Review L03RE038 L01P0016 REVISION PRELAPPR Hours -Q.5 1.0 1,0 (LO) 0.75 1.1 3.35 Amount _$72.4~ $144.90 ,_Jl.44_.90 _ ($144,90) H9_8,~8 $159.39 $485.42 Hours Amount Task/Description Name Org _\Y~rk_~a_y . !' .,,,.,.,r, ~,., !'''f ,.,_ ,,. ""n'"''.· '"""f'':•··,, '.'· "'''" , .. , :·~<-·,-,~" ,.,., . .,, ,.,,., , , ,-~,-,,,,.iTi'""' ., ..... , 'T-,., P''"T'" , .. , , .. , · ., .. ,,, .. , __ Pen,:i.tt/_f>.~"!1 R~view ~' •. 1·-11 ''Dye:}am:es.,•: ! ! ,Ii!,: '.}473(_2W0.2/2004 ,• -----,, 1:: a:~r-_: ,-$J§j3' Permit I Plan Review Rhoads, Kate 3457 07/12/2004 -Peimlt /pial\' Revil.w. ?: ' ' ' -. Whitii,k~f ijrtic_eiG C :! I{i':f 5')0/1 ~1~003_ :y .. ..' . , ' Permit I Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 I 1/17/2003 -· • Periiii1TP1,n_ilf0~f ·,, ,.,, ::··'wiHhaid,r;a._~b~','' ,, r'1J4'1:i 1 •· 'i2zi 11_1_:i:a:a3 Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 12/17/2003 --' -• Pem1liTP1iihJ~Efw · , ?'' -\V_i,iti'_aiilf: B,_ui:e · ' _ :iJjJ _ ]_o]i.i':i/2004 r Permit I Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 01/13/2004 'I"' ., 1··, .. ,, ... ,1 ·••. ""1 , •. ,.,.,., 1·1•· w•····r'":'"' !''"' ' """", •1r·11 .. ; '".! " i'"'\Vhitta.R~f" ·afu·c~r(';''i:/;·; 1·:.·;1.-_·:_'_J_~. 7_-·_j'l_;i':_',:'_ !_6,T,i_i'_6_ /_·20_-_0_···4_'_,_;_n __ ,_·_:;·_ is: , fermit_i Plan_l{eyiew ____ .. , _. _ ·-· __ • , _ .•... -· __ _ Permit I Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 01/21/2004 Pe;;;;ff(~i,m~i~fow ' . Whl~ak;r,_Bruce . ------34:13' '.§i!iif2§0.4 .-:_'! ' Permit I Plan Review Permit/ Plan Review P~miiii .Plan Review Hearings Subtotal ER Function ES -SEPA EIS Work Task/Description M~etings ------' Subtotal ES Whittaker, Bruce 3473 03/24/2004 · \y1tih.~er,'i:iru_::e.-'-·· -3473 'os10312064 Whittaker, Bruce 3473 05/06/2004 ' Whittaker,'Briice -, • .• '3473 -os7foiio64 ' '·---' - Whittaker, Bruce 3473 01/22/2004 Name Org Workday schaPer;k"a1efi': '"'''.' 3464-· '-0I/i3/2004 ' ,, 2.0 1.5 Fo··-· 0.5 ,:','.Jlf;Q1_·\, 1.0 ,, i'.o''- 1.0 . ''*TfiT':· 1.0 'o'.s 3.0 18.75 $289.80 $§2,00 $276.00 $2~7:oo $207.00 's°i44,90' $72.45 i $144.9(i $144.90 $144.90 $144.90 's14f90 $144.90 $72.45' $434.70 $2,678.93 Hours Amount ' 1·0.3 ,--·-·-·· $43.4?! 0.3 $43.47 ' · ·-soc Function PR -Land Use Applications Review Task/Description Name Org Workday Permit / Plan Review Chen, Michael 3456 11/17/2003 . Permit) J>iiin Reviiw •.. • ~<:h~rer, K!1I~.n: 34§4 1C@6/2003 Permit / Plan Review Scharer, Karen 3464 10/23/2003 Per_rnit[i>jan Rexl"W '. : s~ii~rir;'i<i~eii . 3464 • 1012112003 . . ··--· ~ ·····---.. Permit/ Plan Review Scharer, Karen 3464 12/01/2003 i_ '.· --,_·i ', ~~i1~Jt))>f~t{:~~;fe\Y\1. i\ 'C? :'. .;? ·i·r:''.'IS9.~~rer;: -~JiriD1'..::·i:: :·,::i_' Tt'34~~'.~'~'.'t1i)}~64ii9J}'~F-(T'.';··.-~r'T~'::IT~ Permit/ Plan Review Scharer, Karen 3464 12/10/2003 : 'Pe~iti. PIJn R~vie~ 1 : • • •• • ••• ,.·.··.·,.,·.·. s.-.c .. h, .. ,a.-.r .. e .. r_'i.K.·.·~.,·.·.~ .. ·e.'.n.···.·. ·.· _:.: ····., 3464' :··,· · oihs12004 ... ·.: .... · .. · -·· , 1 .. ,,,, » "", ·, ,-! .... , .. , ... :""'·' ·-··· ,.•,-.. ,.,, , .. ,: : , ,;_, ,,,:,,.H., .. , .:,, I"" _(,.,., ,.,, ... '"'"·k""·'·· , Permit/ Plan Review Scharer, Karen 3464 02/05/2004 Jii,ari~gs" .. -. . il.£~ar_!lr, ~ar~n ' , _3~6f ' 0,l_/~~~QQ4 Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 10/06/2003 Project§oorctirta~ion ' ' _ Schater;'~ln 34~( )01j.31200.:r Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 I 0/23/2003 i : · i;'rojecii'.:gordihati3~: r· •• schafe,;,i<.a.rI~:,,•.:. ·. )4§<1-(:i)0171i;0Qi Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 12/02/2003 . project_§9~r~inat[~~ . fZhare~, i{~r~~:.:.; )464 . giQ.3/~9.<>.~ Project Coordination ,., ,.,, Scharer, Karen ... _3-~_64 12/04/2003 · i:;;;j~~ic_oorctina1i 9n. ···· · ·sa;;;e~.R~~en.:.: 3464. i21g9120Q·:i.~ Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 01/12/2004 'p' ·r·:'o' ','e' c' '1'.''c":"o'·o·'r;:d·''',:tnr: 'a't','"o''n:··:·1 11 i 1·: ';"\iinflr;t,IY: 's'c:ih'''a!:~r·'e"/r1rK····rari''le:i'n, "'.:~ ·; ') _::.1.: .• ·•1 .• ··~···4·_·_·6·.··_4· .. ·.:;-\ .. : .. ·.:·r·:·;··.o·.··1·.1··.·1·_·3··.·1· .. 2···· .. o·.o·. '.4··;_:::.,_·:.-,7 .• •• .• ·.,·. 1::-·, .. :; _:,,., .. ,, ~-·· .. ,.,.,., .. _ -·····---····'"'·:!,,,r·' .•. ).;.,,.:.;,.,·:.,.,,.,.,' .•• , .. , .• , ..... ,... -.... - Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 01/13/2004 Hours 0.75 }.O 1.0 2.0 0.7 ''''''\ (.Q :· i '> 1.0 ,, ,Q,:5 .. , .. 0.75 . 5.0 2.0 . J.2 0.5 o:s. 2.0 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.3 '0.2 0.1 \. , .. Proje,~'(c:qor~Liiitigr:::;, , ....... : ....... Sc~~i,r,i<•r<ini.i': :o:)4§4:.n11J7Qi]iii,4'' ,. -. .......... 1,t. Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 02/25/2004 Project coorciin~tii>n , Scharer, Karen ::· 34§4 .. ·:9312:i/iog4 . Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 03/24/2004 · ·p~~j~9t·1ccirii~)ri~t~9;r1 :;I'!· . ·· ·;·, ~-:~ · sth¥~f/k~~R:·-:. _ _..:,, ··: :'j46Mr,,. · ··_o4Yi 972991r·:·_:T Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 05/03/2004 .. ~bH~,C(1nta~i ' .1.:' :i.1•i:,,~c~iirer; i<areiJ' : . ·, .. ,}16{'.i. ,)o;gtz~ociI ' :::: ' .... Public Contact Scharer, Karen 3464 10/20/2003 Pu9lic Con~ct . . :-,,, :~ Scharir)<i!reh -· -3464 ... I0/2~12003 . -- Public Contact Scharer, Karen 3464 01/21/2004 I _ P~blic Coh!aci' 1..,. ,., J;charer, Karen ;· .• , "3464 : ''o~~ .. 6£2,0.Q{ , .... -~ __ . ·-' Correspondence Scharer, Karen 3464 10/07/2003 ! ,· ' '¢_0~~SP_9ncie'r~~·::r ;;}iP:f!T(~~ij·~r~~-:·:K~t¥n'.°::L'Ji'.>;6f:Xi)4:~41},\!:~t9(21'ft9Q{1?,j/ii1 :.· :i:·····,. Correspondence Scharer, Karen 3464 10/29/2003 Correspond~nc_e. .:.. ' _Schar~r. Kar.~11 3461 111i'iiz'993 - Correspondence Scharer, Karen 3464 11/19/2003 . C:orrespondence ... s'c,h~rer: I<.a.ren_ -~ 3464 . "6shoizoo4: _ . Meetings Scharer, Karen 3464 10/23/2003 Meethigs;· 1•:.f,:''§c.h~ffr;f::~riii';:1,, · ,.,:}46{ ,'T]Jti.17i99_iJ;f. ·-·'···''·'-··'·· Meetings Scharer, Karen 3464 12/08/2003 .. Mee~~gs ' : ' Sc~ar_ei, ~ilre11 '····" ',. ;)464 '·.: .QI7(212ooi .- Meetings Scharer, Karen 3464 01/14/2004 i{eetings ····-... .... ~charer, ~ar~n . 3464 _ 91D?J200.cj Meetings Scharer, Karen 3464 01/20/2004 · ''fyieiii~gs"' ,,,,,. L .. "'.stii'arff; Kar~n'""'''. . 3464''. :'04/\:si:fo'94:,: Report Preparation Scharer, Karen 3464 I 1/18/2003 .. Rep<?rt Pieparadon . · , ,;; $9harer, i{ar~n/ -3464 , :(\i.\9i:2,Q93 : Report Preparation Scharer, Karen 3464 11/20/2003 0.3 0.2 0.1 '"l'"Q.T .. 0.2 0.2 0.5 9.,2 0.4 . 0.2 0.5 2.5 . 0,5 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.2 1.0 0.5 . 9.2 0.3 2.5 ::2,5 · 0.5 Page 2 of3 Amount $103.50 $27,6.00 $138.00 $276.00 $96.60 jlJ.S:bo $138.00 -,.: $72,45 $108.68 $724.56' $276.00 $16.5:~o $69.00 . $.69,00, $276.00 ...... _$62.:00 $13.80 $69.00 $43.47 _$28,.'fa' $14.49 .J.~11,.3_5 $43.47 $28}f8 $14.49 )14,49 $28.98 .J?J...60 $69.00 ~27,60 $57.96 ,···· $28'.98' $69.00 $1'iI,oo $345.00 $69:00 $27.60 $36.23! $41.40 ·· $69:oo $27.60 .. $14.iio $72.45 . $28.98 . $43.47 ' $]4,49 $345.00 ,$345.00 $69.00 ' · ·soc Task/Description R~port i>,,P!\1'.~t.i~ii i, , . Report Preparation ' """':':.i;'.;,•:;·f·"\'I' > "'·i"i"P~'"'"i'.i 1•r,!"',i Rt1pC>rt_ !'r~PAfalI~n· :: . ' Report Preparation Subtotal PR Function TR -Traffic Review Task/Description 1 '" 1 ?tf~fftR.':~:~if~{{.:::::::::.:: :::.11·: 11, Traffic Review ; Traffi2Revlew .. Name Org Workday $~~ar~r.J~ir~n .• 34(!4. 1.~(16/2003 "' ... ,.,,1 ... Scharer, Karen 3464 12/22/2003 ,. ;·:·~fh~J~f:]{'.afiffJ'.Fi" ·trr ':'J4~'{? ?ff~/i?lgQgf:·. :t?:.·1·:ri Scharer, Karen 3464 01/05/2004 Name 1~11gI~y. JS.[!SJ~~ L Langley, Kristen i\L~gie)', i<rfaig~ ~ .. · Org . Workday j.\'64' 1: 01/16/2004; ,, ,.,~. >,M,, Lk,l.,., ' 3464 01/21/2004 • 34g4'1• ·, 'oi/221200<1 · ·• ,.·: · ·· , · _, ' "" ., ' I 3464 01/22/2004 Hours 0.5 l.O 2.25 45.8 Hours 3.75 /i.6 l.O Page 3 of3 Amount $§.?.00 $138.00 ',,., •,V""'''"' ,·p· ' $276.00 $326.03 $6,420.12 Amount Traffic Review Traffic Review Traffic Review Heaqngs i 1 • Meetings _J,,angley, ~d~t~n . .. :Langley, Krist_eQ ·---·-------~. ,Sfl,?}5 $543.38 s144_,~o: $144.90 $144.90 Mott, Linda · '1~giey: Krfstt1il_' :;,· Langley, Kristen Subtotal TR Function WL -Wetland Review Task/Description Permit I Plan Review Project Coordination . ··-' ' -·:·· .. ·-1· •.. · Cqnf~r.en~~ :_ , i' .. : , <~:,. Field Check Subtotal WL TOTAL: Name . ~as.ey: L,aura.: .. Casey, Laura . r 3;.i~.ey; ~~ijfi:·:· Casey, Laura · 3464 05/Q3/2QO:I · 3457 08/16/2004 34§1 .. , ..• q)i.2712604 -· · 3464 01/13/2004 Org .. ~o~_kd~y ......... .. ' )470~ .. LJi26/2_0Q3 ... . 3470 01/14/2004 .. • 34?{ ... i i7Jj7~Q03 ... ' ....... . 34 70 01/15/2004 .),O_ 0.5 5.5 0.5 14.75 Hours 0.2 0.25 ·•a,s··········· 1.25 2.2 85.15 $72.45 ..... $796.95 $72.45 $2,137.28 Amount $27.60, $36.23 . $~?.<i6'. $181.13 $313.96 $12,079.18 The hours shown above represent the actual hours of service charged on this permit to date. Hours worked that are covered by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly charges not covered by a base fee are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be -~e~ to the,appllcant. All fee~-must be paid in_fuU before DDES lss_ues Final_ Approval, T.C.O. or c_,o. soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Summary of Charges and Payments --''--------------, Applicant: .~esc~}~.~ion flllance Charges SBI DEVELOPMENT L.L.C. P.O. BOX 73790 PUYALLUP WA 98373 253-539-8116 HOURLY FEE: Critical area review HoORLY'FEE: Engineeriii'g i>1aii/k.ilefit\~'; '• SUB TOT AL CHARGES: Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: A04POl 19 LOIP0016 PREAPP-0 COMPLETE Amount -$15.62' $253.58 .,, sCfrffs§' $1,537.09 -Pay1111:111s -- Description Check # Checklogid Ch.· ·.'bck ·· ·· · · 3440 .. ·_· " ··· · F' ' ., ., ,, · i' ·:· · . 1 --· _I; ..• ., ,. Transfer Transfer From L02V0024 Q.heck 3640 ' 7280f .. '... · Check 3697 73525 Payee Date Entered Amount ········saifiEVELOPMENTL.iici' .... " .• ' .. ( .. '' "''" ... ·• "." '" " --~-'""'""·' ...... , '.:1Ji4/20§.:1 7/6/2004 . ,SB! l)~\fl~°(Ql'MlNi_L L. -c: '. ~~--7f.l2/2004 . SBI DEVELOPMENT LLC 8/4/2004 ($2s9:ooY .. , ·-\~ 191._'10) ...... ($1,232.47) --,._.·""I, Transfer · .r · Tran~fer'fo 1L04:V0056 1 • 11 ·.',.·, -. "" ,, ..... ,.,.,,,,.,, ' ......... , .. ,,,,,,, •• , I 9TI 0/2004 . . I.,,.,,,.,,_,,,., .......... ' ($1,056.69) · I454.86. $36.23 $379. 13 $362.25 Transfer Transfer Transfer To L04GI143 Transfer To L04~RQ24 Transfer Transfer To L03RE038 SUB TOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: 9/10/2004 9/10/20'04 9/10/2004 ($1,537.09) $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to ODES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paicl in fun before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. -·-------------------~---------------------------~~-------~ .. soc DOES King County Department of Development and Environmental.Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Hourly Charges Detail ~---------------- Applicant: SBI DEVELOPMENT LLC. P.O. BOX 73790 PUYALLUP WA 98373 253-539-8116 Function ER -Engineering Review Task/Description · · · · Perm1fi,,Ptan Re~ie; Permit/ Plan Review Subtotal ER Function GO -Geological Review Name • ci,esifo:r,J:i._if :•· Dye, James Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Org Workday 3~1r;:_ o.~11 s.120.04' · _ 3473 04/27/2004 Task/Description Name Org Workday · ·,,:··.·;.i.ete.-Appi'ic·ati 1on::·P:teparation;;:;:. Tf:~:;1.:.r:<'·1,,:west;1·E~wrenc:·6r,:·6 1·:.1;r(1347tPii·:"04;2;1~i'oo4·: :·: :,:::,·: ·1·::::· Subtotal GO A04P0119 L01P0016 PREAPP-0 COMPLETE Hours .:~Is 2.75 3.25 Hours ::;f:25·;: 1.25 Amount . $72)5 $398.48 $470.93 Amount $181:i:i $181.13 Function PM -Project Management Task/Description Name Org Workday Hours Amount $108.68 $~6',:!5 Permit/ Plan Review Permit/ Pian! R~~ie.~ Permit/ Plan Review · · rem\H/p1iln il~vi~~ Subtotal PM Function WL -Wetland Review Task/Description Dye, James 3473 04/14/2004 0.75 t>Y~<l~m·~~~?.::1:Jp .. '"'' )4?,t.,·::,::'.)1!)~J7hQ( .. ·.::.·:.;:;:.·~·;;:~·~.:.:_ ._. . ":•;-{r·:. Dye, James 3473 04/26/2004 I"' , ... ,.' , ....... ,! !'"W' :-:;·» "'.' '·"T"'"""~''"'""'t r···r"~' ,.,••, ,,, ,,~,~,,, '''"'" · . , Dye, James: , , . , 3473 : • 04/29/2004. 0.25 5.5 Project Management Fee Estimating Name Casey, Laura Org Workday 3470 04/19/2004 Hours 0.5 Subtotal WL TOTAL: 0.5 10.5 $36.23 ··1144.90 $796.96 Amount $72.45 $72.45 $1,521.47 The hours shown above represent the actual hours of service charged on this permit to date. Hours worked that are covered by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly charges not covered by a base fee are charged at the rate In effect at the time of service. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be 11aid i11 full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O._ .. sec ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055~1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Summary of Charges and Payments Applicant: U.S. LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOC C/0 CENTURION DEVELOPMENT 22617 8TH DR SE BOTHELL, WA 98021 425-486-2563 Description '.,' ';··.','I·.· ., ,,,. I:,-• <:;ounter.Service Fees· . -· HOURLY FEE: Engineering Plan Review HOURLY: FEE:Land \Jse,Pla11niiig.,· ...... . :: / ','; SUB TOT AL CHARGES: Description Check # Checklogid Payee Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: AOOPOl64 LOIPOOl6 PREAPP-0 MTG-HELD Amount _$93.05 $396.00 $396:oo $885.05 Date Entered Amount chbi:k ,, •. /i r Ii 94' \! i.' _ , ·:_ ':l[:sL'.4A@j5g_\T,EtQPlv1,loN:T A~S9g',,-,s73oizooo. · 8/7/2000 ($35}50) ($428.55) ... ($99:iJO) Check 5014 30372 U S LAND DEVELOPMENT Check ,,,;,, :5020,-.. ; 31286, .. 9/13/2000 SUBTOTAL PAYMENTS: ($885.05) BALANCE: ($0.00) The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DOES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. AI_I fees _must be_ paid In full before D_DES issues Final App~oval, T.C.O. or C.O. • ·-· SGC DDES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Hourly Charges Detail Applicant: U.S. LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOC C/0 CENTURION DEVELOPMENT 22617 8TH DR SE BOTHELL, WA 98021 425-486-2563 Function PR -Land Use Applications Review Task/Description Name .. PeTI11iVPlairRevi,\\' ·•· !! . '~hfS:~[erj~th Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce . "·.· Fi~.iC(¢h~ck: "i :,-:-?/ff: i::::·::~9:fi~{~r; :~~f,~~·::·:·· Meetings McManus, Aileen Meetings ::scliare,;K.aren ... Subtotal PR TOTAL: Activity Number: ' Project Number: AOOP0164 LOJPOOJ6 Development Number: Perm it Type: Status: Org Workday ···.· }4?~ !i:O§h:iii()QQ: ; · 3473 06/28/2000 , < ., I 'V":··1·• .. ,,,. '"•·~··~, , .. ,.,., .,,.·-.; : 346!1;, OJII2/;QQO, ! 3464 06/28/2000 PREAPP-0 MTG-HELD Hours .... Jo 2.0 0:75 . 1.0 1.25 6.0 6.0 Amount . $Ei:foo $264.00 s;~foo $132.00 $165.00 $792.00 $792.00 The hours shown above represent the actual hours of service charged on this permit to date. Hours worked that are covered by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly charges not covered by a base fee are charged at the rate In effect at the time of service. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in_ fLJII before _ODES is!ue11 Fln'!I Approval, ,:,c,o. or C.O. ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055·1219 Project Name: NICHOLS PLACEIL03P0015 Project Location: SBI DEVELOPING, LLC ATTN: RICHARD BARBER P.O. BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 Project Management Statement Statement Date: 8/9/2006 Customer: Permit#: L05Sl106 Project#: L03P0015 Parcel Number: 1423059058 Penmit Type: INSPECT Status: PUNCHLST Page I ofS Project Management Statement Managed Project Hours Budget: Total Hours Worked (see Hours Detail): Total Budgeted Hours Remaining: Fixed Fees: 188.00 113.25 74.75 Description ..• Counter Service Feii"s . ' " ~%~\Isl ·· " ,. Qef~rred .. $154.20 .... Due Now . $102.64 $154.20 Finance Charges Total Fixed Fees: Managed Project Hours Budget: . Total Man'aged Project Budget:. ,.' '' > ' ' ',:, ' . :,,, '. ,/,' 1,"; ,Total AmountDeferred: .· .. · ' ' "L ,., ' '' >",' >,' ' ' /ii/; ' •AMOUNTDUEATAPPLICATION: · Installment Payments: Scheduled.for 7/1/2005. Scheduled for 8/1/2005 Scheduled. for· 9/1"/2005 Scheduled for 10/1/2005 · ·scheduled fcir."1;1/1/2005 .·:, Scheduled for 12/1/2005 · ·schedulec:f'for 1/1'12006 ·· •·· Scheduled for 2/1/2006 scheduled for 31112006: :,· Scheduled for 4/1/2006 r,,. Scheaulecffcff 5/1/2006 ·.· Total Deferred Installments: Pa ments: • r ·,·' .......... . ,' ._'t,,r ,I:•..,,;:\,; Date Posted Payment Type CkloglD 5/20/2005 Transfer From L03V0036 6/2/2005' ··. _Check, · ::; . 9/20/2005 Check Sri945 10/28/2005 .. Transfe(FrciiriT.05MI042 .. · ' 11/16/2005 Check · · 1/12/2006 Check · . 3/17/2006 Check 4/13/2006. ·:.check. ,. 4/13/2006 Check · 511512006·· · "' check ·, ·. ·,, :· ... .,. · .,. ·. · ·,., Total Payments Received: 88999 . 90925.' ·. , 93011 93819" . ' •.. 93820' .... 94957"?· $256.84 $0.00 $27,241.20 $13,620.60 $27 ,498,04 · · :$13,6_20;60 ' $256.84 $13,620.60 . ...... , ... :$1;238.24 $1,238.24 .. ""i$1,238.24 $1,238,24 ... _'$1:238.24 ,· ,, ·: ~l1:~~~j: $0.00 Amount Check# $493.35 $13,229.89 . 4419 :· $4,952.96 . 4713 .. $1,04f27''' •'· r $1,552.01 4881 : $2,476.48 ... ·. 5029 $1,250.62 5202 $1,23824 '• ,, ... ·5317 ·. . $25.02 -5316·-··· $f238:20, . ·o 5465 '. I,',' , V' $1,238.24 . "$1,238.24 l1·~~t~i $13,620.60 'I' r ($27,498.04) $0.001 'I ,f Page 2 ofS Tota1' Balance: I I ""'"' ·-·-~· ...... .,.. . ·~r ''':'i' 1$0'.00 1 ' 1 ,,:, Disclaimer Language for Permits under Project Management Based on permit information submitted by the applicant, the Department of Development and Environmental Services has determined the amount of review fees for the subject application. The fees shown do not include ancillary permit fees, project-related mitigation fees, or any other fees that are passed through to the applicant from other agencies or as part of the project's environmental review. Fee estimates are based on information submitted to ODES by the applicant prior to finalization of the permit application. In addition, estimates are determined by utilizing historical data gathered from projects of similar type, size, and scope. DDES's fee estimate is subject to revision under conditions including, but not limited to, the following: 1) Unknown or undisclosed site or project issues 2) Changes in the project 3) Incomplete information from applicant 4) Errors in applicant information or submittal 5) County code fee changes 6) Appeals Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. All fees must be paid in full before ODES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. For billing questions, please call 206-296-6659 Page 3 of 5 Permit Number: L05Sl106 Statement Date: 8/9/2006 Hours Detail Function Task Name Workdate Hours Projecl Managem~nt; Qualit{Control Revi~wf : ' i;Edcty::Rot,eii .... , , 5/jll/~OO(' .. q::_sp Project Management Permit/ Plan Review Pray, Jeffrey 5/17/2005 1.00 'P.f0j8~{ MSri~geme,,:1(: . ::~~: :::-: :--; ~~.ITTi'i't'f'P1.~ri):~'8Vi~'.lw( :·:::·:r:'.'. '.""j: .:::::.· :·:··, .. ;·~tl!.:'.:'..'. ._. _:f.>~~y/)81ff8y=·-'.-~:-:::~ .-~~·:?.~_)'Jt8Z260~:: : 3'.75 Project Management Field Check Pray, Jeffrey .. 5/19/2005. 0.75 i,:·: F1roje·c(M-anageme.nt ·:i, · ·:_;-pe:rm1t /P'iS_n·~ev1ew: :::-;c~·i'".1_: • • •• ·:~-·1:::T1-·i·1 ···:"_: .. L:eray,~J.~ffi8Y_-· : .. _:~s-6912-aos: · . _2.40 Project Management Project Management Fee Estimating Pray, Jeffrey 5/19/2005 1.00 el'QjeCf ~a~_~g~~~.n( · · ___ :T :Jr~_v:~! :nr-i~.:: .:.~:-:.:: ... · ,,~_::.: ··,;:_:::.~·:·.:·. :.; · · . P.f~y; ·~~tt~Y · . . ·-~!19'.?.995. :Q·.s_o Financial Guarantees Mana Financial Guarantees Mgt. & Mon Graves,.Stacy 5/20120.05_ 0.75 :· __ f>~Oj~Q( ~:a.P:ige_"1~:nt ···:::· :_· :¢~:mm.u:~:iCSt[Q.~_S _(§J~ff .9.0..0!ijiiiijtio.~·-·._:_:·· -. Pf8Y]8.fJi~Y-.: .~.. .. ~?.f2:9t.?.6.9?. . . f ~o Financial Guarantees Mana Financial Guarantees Receipt G.rav.es, .Stacy 6/312.005 0,.50 "Sij8"T~spe:ctto·n_:~-:·.~.:. ::·:~i:eCOl1Sfrij(:ti9:~ .. P~P-~iat.i_Ori __ -: ... :.'.~ Ch~S.:tU:&.i':1tfrnot_hy... 6iii26o5. . _{._:i5 Site Inspection Pre-Construction Conference Cheatum, Timothy 6/812005 1.00 "}>it~·.!ffSp~iji.~~~: . ·-:-::ti·::: Ii~.v~.1 Tirrl:e·_-:·-~···· . _ . .. _ ~.'.~:-· ~~::: .. :::.~::~c.~S.:BJ~'TI-.JilTI_ci(bv":. .6~8/fQ9~--9;·1s Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey . 6/9/2005 0.20 ·sit~..ifi~Pf~km' .,... ....... ¢'1~~r·fn!]iGr8ding:lris.P.~~HO~-~ .. -.. : -"r ..•. "'Cheat~n,_,.TiffiOthY ---~ ·s,1012oot; o.i5 Site Inspection Travel Time . ·et,eatum, Timothy. . .. 6/10/2005 ·o.75 · Sffefosiieciion : Clearing/13ra~ingfnspectio:ns:: .. ·::~· . .. . . . . .. :ctieatum, Timothy ·513612005· 1.50 Site Inspection Communications Staff Coordination· Cheatum, Timothy 6/30/2005 0.25 ; ~tt~ t~~P,ec1,oij,_-·:·:Jrayei rtrn~ ·,. _;-·--: -· · . _:·. · --· --· ·· ··-c_n·_~a!u'TI-, 1111\~ihf .... ·-__ e~·q,2q·o5 0:.1_~ Site Inspection Special Meetings (Inspections) Cheatum, Timothy 7/1/2005 0.75 Site Inspection . Travel Time-. _ • i . -. C~e~iuni, Ti,iiottiy 7/j/2005 0.75 Site Inspection Clearing/Grading Inspections Pray, Jeffrey 7/14/2005 0.60 -$!t_8 1_~Sp_8~1C,ri . _·:. -~:-·-.tra_V~i TI.nie_': -. --~ .. --· . .. . ~ .... eraY,. Jj!ffi8y 7H4i2665 : .-. j~.50 Site Inspection Communications· Telephone Pray, Jeffrey _7/19/2005 0.10 --Sit~ i_ri~~.qti~n· ' : ·.·.·~·9c>m"1U.lliCBii91l·s :J8J8phOrl:~:-· . ·Pr8y,Jeff~~y-· _7_12112005_ . q:19 Site Inspection Drainage & Utility Inspections Pray, Jeffrey 7/22/2005 0.50 , Site 111·sp~ction i'rayelTim~· . .... -. . . . . . Pray,_Jeffrey . 71221?005 0.26 Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 7/26/2005 0.20 -... Slf~Jn~-p~ctiO~-· ,, --· _· .~::::' irit8.faci!Vi, ·conim.~_rilca_tiOns :_che_1;1~~[D. Tir!)-Othy 1~61200~ . · o:50 Site Inspection Special Meetings (Inspections) Pray, Jeffrey 7/26/2005 0.50 -~iie Inspection' Travei Time . . . . . . . Pray, jefirey .. 7/26t:2005 0.40 Site Inspection Drainage & Utilit,iinspections Cheatum, Timothy. 8/212005. 1.25 . ~ne lnsl)ection _ travel J\me" '".. •. ----c~eatum,_firy·lcithy 8~~095 o.75 Project Management Field Check Pray, Jeffrey 8/3/2005 0.20 . Projecf "'1anagein,inl . Travel Time .. .•. . . .. Pray, Jeffrey 8/3/2005_ 0.30 Site Inspection Communications Staff Coordination -Cheatum, Timothy 8/4/2005 0.25 SJte ins~ction. -·orainage & Utility Inspections . __ .... ·Pray:·jeffrey.. . 8/1012005 0.75 Site Inspection --Tr8v81 Tfm8., · ..... · --· Pf.iy, Je-ffrey · .. 8/1 o/2005 · · 0.80 :_·_ :~it~_'!n~Pe~ti011 ·:. Qi~JhSQe~ez :UJi1~Y_(~~P~~19ns·: _ ·9he~,~rri •. IillicifhY _:_ --·-_·· -e,12i200S j:Oo Site Inspection Road Inspections C.heatu.m, Timothy .8/15/2005 1.00 . Site inspection ·:Travel Time ...•. -. . • Ch~aiuin, flniofhy •..... s11s12bo5 . ·· 1:00 Pro/ect Management ·aua.hty Control Review Pray, Jeffrey 8/16/2005 0.10 . §iteins.p8cli~n~----· . -· R08d fos·peCHo-n~ < -• • ··----:~ .. ~·:ch~titUm·,·_;-i_niOthy ·ei16t?oos . · 1.00 Site Inspection Travel Time C.heatum, Timothy 8/16/2005 0.75 , ~)t~:1.n.!iPe~J0/1. R.~.i~_)rj~p1f6_*>I1S_ ~!}-~:-:. Ch~.~t~-~.,,:i!Tiot~y . _81171200~ 0.75 Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 8/17/2005 0.75 Project Manag·e111ent ' ·: . .cornniiinjcaii9ns -Stait'Coo.rilin~tion Pray, Jeffrey_: ~-•. 8/19/2005 . 0.25. Site Inspection Special Meetings (Inspections) Cheatum, Timothy 8/23/2005 0.75 ... Siie inspection. C ,, Travel.Time. . : . , .. . C:lieaiuni,J'imothy, ...... 8/23iilid5 6)5 Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 8/25/2005 0.25 t,,,$i.te:_l~_~p~:¢!.Of , 1 ,, J:-.:::· R:O#d}~_sp~Cti~:'l~ '"r-·. ·-:.:-: .. :.:·'.':'.'J~.ti~8j~l:r) ... IfrD.~Ofr ... _ 8!~1f2Q0_5,. 1 :oo Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 8/31/2005 0.75 '.~ ?i_te.:i_rySp~.~!0~'.:'. :;;r:7:~:g.?# fo~R~~tfQiii ., .. _1 .::·:~:·:.~::~--:· •• ~~ ... ~:~-;.r_1 •• :~,. '.:~;:~:.-?.C~.~·af~ij,'])rri.Ql~Y-.--:.:~~ji/'icioS.:-~·-Jo"p Site Inspection Travel Time C'.;,he.atum,.Tim.othy_ . 9/7/2005 .0.75 -s(fe: 1.~·sp·E!cii_cfn::: ::c·;;;-mmU~riJ~i!~fiij:·$:t~f(¢()9~ij_ih~tiO'ri·~~-~::~~:·~=:x:"~~~ .... :·-~~j~jU_m·. J:iQ19t~Y.:~. ··: , 9t1)/~_o_o5 .. ·.o. 1_5 Site Inspection Communications Staff Coordination -Cheatum, Timothy 9/14/2005 0.25 $it~Jr\iP'~qt10:if :,, t • r:--1 ·:· , 1 ''i ::;:E_d~~i!:iD_:gOtjfrS)_1~'.1 }.:: :·r'·r·: ··~: .. · ··,-: .. r · :·:·:.:~: ' .. :::::·. : :·: ;_¢.~~:~j~.iri'.:1.irn'9~-~y-~::·.: , .. :·:_:·~tJ?(?·o:o,§ ,_9_:_50 Site Inspection Travel Time C.heatum, '!imothy 9/15~0,05 0,-75 · • sitednspection , . Tl .. 1riieraciiiie co111niunicaiioiis •, · . •: ::: ::1 :c~eaium,:TimothY 91301.2.005 :.1:06 Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination P.ray, .. ~Ei,ffrey . .. .. 10/5/2005 o.-10. Site lnsp'3ctiO·ri·':: ,·!',: :·:: ,:::-,s·p~ci~i',M88tir1QS:·cin'"s"pe:cti00S'j' ·. ·r. i :·::c.h88t~m·;:Ti_rTIOt_hy. 101s12oos l .... :: ·:. ~ :oo Site Inspection Special Meetings (Inspections) ... ch.ea!~.!"·.Timot.~y. 1015/2005 _0,75 Sit8:fn:sp(@'iO~I' ' :'.:J/.ijif°~.i:tfm.~·:-:·:.'.. :'.:·:.::·: i.'.:ti:'.:·::·:;;,.1·:· -··. ··;:·:-r'"'"' J;1 :' :·:.9,h~.~Wl1J,.I\m9~~y' W/~f.2_0Q5. ·, 0.7~ Project.M.anagement Communications. Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 10/6/2005 0.25 Site lnspectibn. : Drainage'.&' IJti)ityfnspe@ons C• :,}; •;° '::! :;}Cij~aiu111:T1111oifiyJ' • :; 1 o/etgoos • . 25.0 Site Inspection Plan Change Creation -Field Cheatum, Timothy 10/612005 1.00 :i i,:'~it8: l~S~~CifO'~·:," "":.::::1:::::JI1;;T[i: :-:::,::r.i: ::::~unChij~fli{SP~~t!~'.ri.~ ·: !:;Jr:, iI::'.:'.:,:t::r::t:1.::: ·!E}'.JiTi:ur:~:T!'~Y9:6~:;'.$.1.~.r~·;: :::· [':;::: ... ~9/~t? .. q9f' ,, f:Q6 Site Inspection Punchlist Inspections Lyons, Sidney 10/6/2005 1.00 ',U §J{~J~,SP~.~!OifFl"" :·: :: J;!:::2it~.i!:~Gt:1rii~::::i':'.!·_:'.JI!.i.F!}!J'.!.!?'.'.:tT::.::?::'T!f ]TtfJ2ii!'.G}fi:¢..bi~:tH~1:;f1_rh_q!ff?. : 1Qi§l?9.Q.s .. -·· :· :'O)~ Sit<; lnspe~tio_n_ . . .... .. ... .... Travel Time ............................................. .............. ..... Lyons, Sidney.......... . .... 1.0/6!2ClCl5... 0.50 .~f0j~if_M,8ri89~~-i6f:;:(::f::;:: Site Inspection 1 ,_,_SiJe-·f6~P:~~!9.11i": Site Inspection ·-~Sife: 1n·sp:~ctfc,_n: · Project Management ·, ~Jftfi5·s1?:e·~te>r: ····· .. :·,·.·. ·.· Site Inspection ,, .. :.PrOject· riS'ii'SQe·m_ent?:" Site Inspection , s·i{e_:ln'SReijiOn . Site Inspection J!te:·i~_Sp_~cu~".i:: Site Inspection Site_il1SP8.ctio.fi Site Inspection . Sifri fr1Sp_ecti0!1 . Site Inspection :·si!~)6~P~9!f9.~-~'" Site Inspection ~it8 fn~pection . - Site Inspection Pfoje:t;:t_~_allag·er11·e~~ Site Inspection . Pr9je~ i.l~,iag~iiieni ..... Site Inspection 1 ·: ~-rqjetj -~-;ul~g~fu~rit Project Management i $i!8-inSP8Cfio~,.. ... Site Inspection . Fi~allcia:fGU·arant8eS)~~ari'8 .. '. Financial Guarantees Mana Page 4 of5 i : i 1 ?QQ~iiiY~!9~t(o,·~~:~:-$fijff9§~f~_iff~~!i?-~.:::::i:::1 ·?:· [:Ui::.!::':?J~'f~Y:-~~,~ft~r:::~::·.~:::: '. ·:·1 ·orr,26os:: ·~/,:· ... o'. 10· Interactive Communications Cheatum, Timothy 1017/2005 0.50 'fi§iie&)~IM~~Iiifo~·(l~~P~i:iiO:iis)[ ·.•.• '· · · ··· :qh~~t~iliitiri,:oihv·· ')Qitf29~qs • •· ...•. 1. :oa. Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 1017/2005 0.75 . , "';'"'~!GQITI'fu~~QiC:8t,i'Ofi~'.S"f~:ff'.¢:o.o~fii8.~!0~:'.~ :::·:'.: .. :¢~1i~i(UV5:LI!ffi:O_thy:·=:· ,10{1J~005. ·, .... o.~s_q Communications~ Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 10/12/2005 0.40 spei:@M••tiiig((1rsp~c:ti<>@Cc: ' .•.. ' :. . :, . c:~~~@n:Jiiii<>!hY : 1P1121iqo5 · .. 2,09 TravelTi.me . . .. ... . ... .. . .. Cheatum, Timothy 10/12/2005 0.75 conimunlcations:.siattci,6iilinatioi, . ~ ·:~.~.: Pray;'Jeifrei : . . . fdh3i?065 ... 0:30 Special Meetings (Inspections) Cheatum, Timothy 10/13/2005 1.00 Travel.Time i. . ' . . . .. . ' . -C6E>atl!ri:i, J[m?i~y jd/j3!2005 9)5 Punchlistlnspections .•• . . Cheatum, Timothy 10/14/2005 1.00 :, Punc.hlist lnspec:tion~ . ·. Ly9rs,.§i~n.ey '' T6ii;j"1206s. .Joo Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 10/14/2005 0.75 .tiiive.1.Tiine. . Lyo,ns,'S[ifoE>y:: .• :· ·:rn/14/2005 05.0 Communications Staff Coordination· Cheatum, Timothy 10/18/2005 0.50 Special Meetings (lrisiiedions). _ .' Cheaiuiii, Timothy . . 1 Q/19/2005 .. -1 :so Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 10/19/2005 0.75 .Pun.ch list lnspe.ctio~s . . .. ·-Ch~jiforr>,}imc:,t~i .:.:·J gg11299s . : 1.50 Punchlist Inspections Lyons, Sidney 10/21/2005 1.00 Trav.el Ti.me·. .. .. Ctieaium, Tiinot~y . 1 oi21i2665 . 0.75 Travel Time Lyons, Sidney 10/21/2005 0.75 '.~~~?!11m·ynicaij~n.S ~ ·sJaf(C.oOf~ifi~ti.Q!L:· ~:~ ... Pr~Y. }~ffre}'~ ··· 1 Ol.?.Si?"OQ5. · 0.25 Communications Staff Coordination. Cheatum, Timothy 10/25/2005 0.50 . -.. C:.cimmunications ·: StaffCoordinalion. .Pray, Jettiey' . : 10/26/2005 0.25. CoITl-municatiOns Staff Coordina"t!On ~ Cheatum, Timothy 10/26/2005 0.50 : C!lmniu~icationi-:teleplione . . Pray; Jeffiey -. 10i27/2_005 O)O Permit/ Plan Review Pray, Jeffrey. 10/27/2005 0.20 .¢~,:,,i,,urilcations: Telephone f.'ray,.Jii:ffrey . 1012112,005 ci:30 Bond Reduction Pray, Jeffrey 10/28/2005 3.80 . Jirianciaf!fuiiraniees.t,igt& Mon . <:ii~ves::stacy 10/3V266s 1,60. Processing Certificates of Insurance Graves, Stacy 10/31/2005 0.40 .firi~l}Cjal_ ~~~ra~te~s.·M~.na .... _ .. F/n~rlC!~l-9U8~~nt~e-~.Re-~iP.t ,_ ~~ ~:ffF~eS.~$fa9' .111_112009_ Q._90 Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 11/1/2005 0.70 . Site in,spect\on C •• '. C:ommiinii:aiions s·taff C:oordiiialion -. : " Ch•.~1~1)1, Timothy_, .. """11/1/2005 0.50 Site Inspection . -··1nteraCiiVe·communication'S . -. . . . Cheatum, Timothy 11/1/2005 1.00 . _ S)te ·1risJ)86tiOii_.. _)iu_nch·ust 1~SP8~i~ns:. ~ · Che'.~ii.mi/fil'r!othy 1111512005. . ·roo Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 11/16/2005 0. 75 ~~i~ffln-~P~ft_iOi, .. : -P,~_[lch.l(Sl!r:i·~p~~t.iOrls · ___ Qti~~Jlf.m, ·riin~fhy· 11117/2.0QS .1.:qq Site Inspection Punchlist Inspections Lyons, Sidney 11/17/2005 1.00 Site inSpec{knl:::: . · -:travel time ··--..... .... ~h~~tun1.";fjn:_lo!tiY : ~·11(1.71f605 __ . ..o.75. Site Inspection . TrBVel Time Lyons, Sidney 11/17/2005 0.50 )3ite·il1Specti.o_n_:· ... '. -· ::'cOIT11Tl·~n_iCB.i_!O~s_:$.tBJt ¢~~r-dfnati.O!l' ·.~ .. -·g_h~~Juffi:.i\rm1t_~y 11123~~905 o.Kq Project Management Communications -Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 11/29/2005 0.20 ,Site Inspection . .. . Specia(Me~tirgs (lnspection,s) : . , C::h~.~tum:Jiriiot~y 1?/15/2005 0]5 Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 12/15/2005 0.75 ·~itE! ·1nSP8Ciio~ _ . . .. ~\J.r:i~fiTiS(1~spe¢"i_OhS' . .. 1 · ! . . jj)188t~·m. ... !!"19ihy . : 1~t'16J2oOS:, ·.2."So Site Inspection Travel Time Cheatum, Timothy 1.2/16/2005 0.75 Site Inspection puiichiist Inspections. Chea"ium, Timothy· . 12120i2005 1.50 Site Inspection Punchlist Preparation -Field Cheatum, Timothy. 12/20/2005 2.50 $i:te. 111~P~~iOr.. . :·i :·;. tr·aV8i'TfITl8 ·::.:· ,.: ·-.. , ..... ~ .. : ~~-. .. .... Ch88iUin, 1\ITIOthy ·. fa'!20120os· .. _0::15 Site Inspection Punchlist Preparation· Field .. ~'"'che·at.um .. Timothy'--. 12/29/2005, 1.25 ·s;t~IQspe9tioii "" :. puhctilist Prepar~tio~'.,"fi~ld:' ·:· ...... : ' . 9heatun,, 'rir119thy :: .1.?/3.012.005 ·.·· . : 1 .. oo Project Management q~ality Control Revie~ Pray, Jeffrey _ _ 1/4_/2.006 0.40 '.'. FIOaJ\C:ia'(Gji.8.f8~j~8~.i.M.~6i ·:,', 'J .. -::F.lri~l)\~i.~\ '.~~:a:r~·Dt,8~5.,r~Q{~&)~~i~~:;·~~:::·: ';-;:;; ;:~:~-,... :--:c:;r.~~~S.":?t~cY: ·.:. ;. Jt.1 'jf~!iO~--·-· . -'.(f}5 Project _Manager:r,ent __ i. Communications. Staff Coordination ... , . '"' ... _ .... ~~~.Y ... ~-~f:f!:~Y .. __ , ................. V\?/~9g.~ """ 1 0.10 .Proje9t;Mifoageri:,~ii(T .... , .. :• : C:iim.6i'u.nI~([g~{:$i~ffciiii.i~iii~tion .::: " .:,.. .. fr;,y,}~!!r!'Y .. ,., ... ·: ........ 1J~1i?OQ6. 9:2§ Project Management Field Check Pray, Jeffrey 1/24./20.06 1.50 , ;·P.iOje·crM~Q~ge~~-~:t .. :·, .:, . .: · ""traye.i):tl!l~i. XL: 1 '.:.:'.::::::;:.:::.: ·:·,?1·:: :· ..... ·:~ ')'.!~y/J.BJfi~y·, ·1i24/2oo6 · ... · ··a.so Site Inspection Communications Staff Coordination -Cheatum, Timothy 1/26/2606 0.50 • 1 Site ,n5-·pe¢l.O~:: ... I ·;·::.; 1 t'::··:o:qmri:i~~i,C'ifi'Oii,S'.s.~aff .~·o·o_rtji~jtiQi\:~:. , : :".~¢h.~~fum,;·Tirfl()t~{:" ~2!a/2qo(f'"' Q.?5 Site Inspection .spech:11 Meetings (Inspections) (::he.atum 1. Timot~y . .2/10/2006 0.75 " S,it8"1l1SJ)6cttc,n' :·:r1\~Y~liJifoi : "': i! . .'! ',.,:.::. :[)'.~:.: '' .. J. .1, ... , .. ·::i.9~~aj~fo . .Ifi:n~f~Y .. .''. ·: c.' -~!.1P'r~oq:~. . : :0.75 Site Inspection Punchlist Inspections Cheatum, Timothy 2/17/2006 0.50 : ;':,:s1t(1r·specti.9:n 1·;:,}:tr"~'.Y~.1 I1rri~::: ~: : ... ·:},,.:1 • :-, !'i.1. ·.G~~~f~fo /.ti.fu_~:tb'Y:1 ..... : :. ::: .. ·2Hti.2~os.':. :· .' .o)5, Site Inspection Punchlist Inspections Cheatum, Timothy. . 2/22/2006 2.00 "/Si18.:i.HSP~_Ct10h i:t:// '.,d,I ?i ::, ;·:r:::.:trra_v~1:f.iin~J[t!2:::.1.:.:11·i:(:,:I:J ,' :":' I 1 "'i~"'.:¢·~.i~:fU-l!i',]\rri.9fiiY/:.:. r •• :::)~?12'00~·:·,·· Q_.?5 Project Management Communications -Telephone Pray, Jeffrey 3/14/2006 0.25 :,:: ::_:~ p·rpi~'d:.M B'nase1T18.rij__ ,·i· ''i:jjp·1n:m:u.nic~·ti'ons;;:~~titr.'¢:o~r~tn_at1c,;,~'.~::::-i ·~;::i ·::'.~::::m:·::1::pa1y i'.Jiijf~~,.:.::::: ~'.·:· .. ;'.: .. · ... :)t.~-j.£?P.DJ{ , : ·;_0~25 Project Management Communications-Telephone Pray, Jeffrey 4/13/2006 0.10 ! : ~.PrOj~Cf ~ .. ~:o~ge:11)~.~.r: ;:r::t:Jr·7U'!Gom~~ti!C~ti.q6~:.+:cr.~1~P6il~~::1:T::J r , 'l ·,: jJ::u::P.:r~y;: :~.~.tr~ey· !·1::::c,·· ... :,:~zj.41~:99~3,, . ,. · .0}~9 Pr.eject fvl.anage.ment Communications. Staff Coordination Pray, Jeffrey 4/20/2006 0.30 ·: R-r6jeC~:Mi1ri8g'erri~tlf:· '.. , ;.,.1'1:¢,Q'n11T\'~.if(~~.!<?.11'.~\:$~~if¢9.9~in'~HO~{, l.1·:i;!·:?:):):i~Y,'.~iff~Y.· ~'.:T: ::5i~{?QQ§''. . .'Q.'30 Project Management f?rpjes;l_ M_arlag8 .. rij~·nt .. Project Management --. .,PrOJE{ct:rvfo:n:ag'en,e:~1::c··: Project Management ProjeCt Mari8gerrient Total Hours Worked: Communications -Staff Coordination . :-c~rorri u:nJcitiQns:·~: r_e:i_ep)fOff~--.. ~~ _ :.: .'..::· ... ·:~·- commu n icauons -Staff Coordination i .. .' -~-'cl'ii8Jity.:¢0:n([()f_~~YJ8W.i'.'. '"'.?7 .. ::·::· : ..... '" I' ... , Permit/ Plan Review -communicauons··-re1ept1one· Page 5 of 5 Pray, Jeffrey 5/16/2006 0.20 ~ -.::)iiayiJe!frey___-0 6/15/2006_ "6.25 Pray, Jeffrey 6/22/2006 0. 75 _Ti'J:d~y;_Ro.~eiC'.'. ' --~:_6(2~/200~----950 Pray, Jeffrey 6/29/2006 0.10 . ·Pray:Jeiirey -712712006 o.:io 113.25 ,. .- l soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Summary of Charges and Payments ~-=--------------, Applicant: SBI DEVELOPING LLC KURT WILSON PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 Description Counter 'service Fees. '. ,. ,,,,, "'·'" .,. ,,, .. ,,,I•, I , '' ,,.,.,., .. , HOURLY FEE: Engineering Plan Review HOURL y FEE: Site Inspection'.' .. . '" SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Description Check# Checklogid ciieck ........... 37s4 . . ' " Transfer Transfer To L04SR024 Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: L04SR057 LOIP0016 SITEREV COMPLETE Amount ,$.i0.,2.64' $4,412.23 $144.90 $4,659.77 Payee Date Entered Amount sl3JbiiyELQPMii'NT[:L:¢: ' .. ·· Check h ' .. ' 391 L ,ni()f rr ' . ' .• ,,,'ssi,DEVELOPME'Nrl, ' , ,_,,,.1_,.,,.,, .. ,,,,,,. , '"''' •"''"'"''"' .,1 · si:1.612004 · 9/27/2004 Ji 1/7'.J/2QCl4 .. <ss5i9.o<iY $695.50 ($~§ • .,23) ($36.23) $36.23. Check 3971 77670 SB! DEVELOPMENT LLC Transfer . . ·. Tran~fer To L04V00.56··· SUB TOT AL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: 12/9/2004 3/2/2005 ($4,659.77) $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to ODES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate In effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit Issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before ODES issues Final ApJ)roval, T.C,O. or C.O .. ..,, ' ... soc DOES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Applicant: SBI DEVELOPING LLC KURT WILSON Hourly Charges Detail Activity Number: Project Number: Page I of2 L04SR057 LOIP0016 PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Function ER -Engineering Review Task/Description Name .?~g. Workday · f•l1Tliifrl@J~yJ~;;; · · ;:::: ::_cfo,s.~t•f:S~iK'··:··:·:··· .. i41f''.'.'02)1§12.o§.ii 1i;?'" Permit/ Plan Review Dye, James 34 73 09/16/2004 SITEREV COMPLETE Hours Amount . _ . .o.1S ···. · ·· ,· sffof6s 0.5 $72.45 .•..• ,Peiilli.\ i,Pliin~~yie)Y;q,, .. •WQng;_\Vylie ,.::. .:i1z;t;;, Q~/~,0(2QQ~ ••···· .......... ~.o·. $~89,~0. $362.25 $1_30Al $144.90 Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 3473 09/01/2004 ·· ·· ···· Pemi1i /pi~n'Revr;;w·, .;, 1'1 • 1 , wii'iii:\vy11f "1• •11111ct 1:rr:.,rr ·• 3473 (;0910212004·· " • • ·• • ·~---"._! •. , .. -m .... "·• , ,.-·-"'"-·'·• Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 3473 09/02/2004 .. Pefllli!i,plah.~exi~»' ·, · Wgng,'\Vy!je .,, . ·.:··· 3/73 .99i0312004 Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 3473 09/03/2004 Permit'iPlap Re~iiw •, 1 'Woiii:'.Wyli{ •· ': / ,j473'• o~i<i~1ioo4 ' .·., , Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 3473 09/07/2004 Pennitf PlanRe~iew. .. Wofig,\yylie < '.l_47~·:·091i5.'f7io~4 Permit/ Plan Review Permit/ Plan. ii:e,v.ie;;,;i ·. ,·. Permit/ Plan Review Permit I Pian Revi6w :' Permit/ Plan Review Pel11)it} Pl!"' Reyiew Quality Control Review . Quality Control.Review Quality Control Review .. Quality.Cl:lnfrol R5"vi_e;···• Meetings Subtotal ER Wong, Wylie 3473 09/07/2004 ·., ... :.1:1." ;wgpg: .. WYJI~... ~4J{i: : .1.Q~1t~?~90.4 .. :, · Wong, Wylie 3473 09/15/2004 ....• '. Worig: Wytl~~'· ··· ' ,i 3473 • ji9l1§12004, .. Wong, Wylie 3473 09/16/2004 Wong, Wylit. 3473 .. 09/1.6/2004 Sanders, James 3473 09/07/2004 . Sand,;rs; James ;, ; !,u 3173 ,,·. O~/~Oj20Q4 !! Townsend, Steven 3477 09/14/2004 • ..... , ...... • ...... , •• , .. ,. , .... •• , ........ , ... ,.,.' · 1·3···4···1·1":".,0"·9··1·1·6···1·2···0·0··4·:·''.··.·,· ,TC>wnse.p_d; ~!e.~~11 .... :'. .. .... .... .. . Wong, Wylie 3473 09/03/2004 Function PM -Project Management Task/Description Name Org Workday Pef!11i.iJ i>i!!AR"vi,'" · · · -·-·····-·-····· . Dye, J!"'lf~ Permit/ Plan Review Dye, James Subtotal PM •·•r•·-.. , -·· }47~ 3473 )i9114/2004 !' 09/15/2004 2.5 0.9., LO · .. ·i.o L5 · i:s L5 2.0 L5 L5 2.0 2.5 0.25 0,25 0.5 ····.· F44.lio $217.35 , $.36~),5 $217.35 ~260 82 $217.35 .. $289.80' $217.35 '. ,i$217.35 $289.80 ..... $362.25 $36.23 . $36.23 $72.45 ·· o.s i · · . ~:12A} LO 29.45 Hours i.25 0.75 2.0 $144.90 $4,267.32 Amount s;l'sf:13 $108.68 $289.81 .... soc Page 2 of2 TOTAL: 31.45 $4,557.13 f: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------· he hours shown above represent the actual hours of service charged on this permit to date. Hours worked that are overed by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly charges not covered by a base fee are harged at the rate in effect at the time of service. . ees-that have been pos_ ted_ prio_r_ t_o perm_ it-is_ suance. will be collec.ted at-th-at tim_ e. Fees sub. seq_ u_ ently posted will be_ illed to the applicant. AUfees must be paid in full before D_DES issues _Final Approval, T.C.O .. or C.O. _ . . . ~.-: -: .. -SOC ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Summary of Charges and Payments Applicant: SBI DEV. L.L.C. P.O. BOX 73790 PUYALLUP WA KURT WILSON 98373 253-848-0820 Description }J.n~bC~.:9~afg~~:\i-:. ·1 , ·,, :L Roads Standard Variance HouRi'.y}EE' E11iih!'.~rfng·Pl~~Revle\,' HOURLY FEE: Engineering Review SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Description Check# Checklogid Check' · · ":fo'gii ,• .. 7.3. 1.1.s.·9.· .. ·' .. '.i'.'.·.· .. ·.,.·' ...... ,: . : ....... l:.i Transfer . .. Ch~ck '3767. Transfer From A04POl l9 7470[ . ,, . Transfer To L04SR024 ~---------------, Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: '----··· ··- L04V0056 LOIPOOl6 SUBVAR GRANTED Amount _$6 .. 82. $941.85 . _$],qi4j1 $217.35 $2,180.33 Payee Date Entered Amount , 1T:1, s~i:oijyEL,ojiMENf {ti? ); · ·., ,1/j_i;12904 ' SBI DEVELOPMENT L.LC. . . - 9/10/2004 9/10/2004 9/13/2004 . ($i)97.oo) ($~54,8§) ($454.86) $448.04 Transfer .Transfer Transfer :;_I I ii 1t,~ii:irei-i'ti>m ,fo~sRps1 :\!i 1 ·; · ,•·;1Ji212oiiS: i I,»., ........ ,' ......... ,., ..... , ·.·.·:·. i($36.23) ' .... ,, ... , .. , " Transfer From L04PC186 cliec.:k Transfer 4f9ii ·· ·'.')oil(, ~,- Transfer To L04Sl 188 SUB TOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: .S~J DEVEL,QPINQ LLC . . 3/2/2005 ~ ---·---· -..• _,}fl 1/2005_ 7/8/2005 ($4~_:5.42,) ($521.(i~) $521.65 ($2,180.33) ($0.00) ----·----·------. ----------------------· --.. -.. ----·~--· --------- The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to ODES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. • ' .. soc DOES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055·1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Hourly Charges Detail ~-----------------, Applicant: SB! DEV. L.L.C. P.O. BOX 73790 PUYALLUP WA KURT WILSON 98373 253-848-0820 Function ER -Engineering Review Task/Description ' ' ' Penni! /Plan Revl~~ Permit/ Plan Review Penn}_t/Plan Rev\ew Permit / Plan Review .. •. !'emit/ Plan ~~vi;w Permit I Plan Review 11etful1:1J>1!iliR~yiei. Field Check Subtotal ER TOTAL: Name ' C:heshier, B.•!~ Dye, James :_!)ye, James Wong, Wylie Wong,\yy_lfr · Wong, Wylie s:J:'.,'~Y,~~gi;r;~Y.!i~; . !!:,:; Walters, Douglas Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Perm it Type: Status: Org Workday ,, 3473 _ 19Jji4ij96s" 3473 07/29/2004 347~. ·oii'{oJ.2oo4 3473 11/01/2004 3473 01/05/2005 ' ............. ··"" ,,., ' '"~" 3473 01/14/2005 ., .I• ,,,.,1 ... ,.,,,, '".'·.··.'•.",··.',·.'3 .. ·.4.·.·1.·, 3.·.·.·.·.,·.· i16\if4i2tfo5 ~ ,b., ,'d '"'" '"""'' ' ... • • ..: •• : .... ,., 3457 09/22/2004 L04V0056 LOIP0016 SUBVAR GRANTED Hours Amount o:2s··· ......• $3~-~I 1.25 $181.13 --·· 1.0 $144.90 1.2 $173.88 2:0 $289.80 0.6 $86.94 .• ?J!Q\:4~ 1.5 $217.35 8.5 $1,231.66 8.5 $1,231.66 The hours shown above represent the actual hours of service charged on this permit to date. Hours worked that are covered by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly charges not covered by a base fee are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.c .. o. o.r C.O. ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Project Name: EVENDELL•• L01P0016 Project Location: 13606158TH AVE SE SBI DEV. LLC MARK ENEBRAD P.O. BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 Project Management Statement Statement Date: 8/9/2006 Customer: Penmit#: L05FR017 Project#: L01P0016 Parcel Number: 1423059009 Permit Type: FINAL Status: COMPLETE Page I of3 Project Management Statement Managed Project Hours Budget: Total Hours Worked (see Hours Detail): Total Budgeted Hours Remaining: Fixed Fees: ~::~i:~is611rnsr:.i11 .. ···.· · School MPS Admin Fee Counter Service Fees : .. Recording Fees Total Fixed Fees: Managed Project Hours Budget: . ' ' ,,,·.' ' .:. ·," '' ':''.,"'I''""", ., ' •Total Managed Project Budget: · .: ' ' ' ,, .... '•:,. '.,' ,'. !,!, '•'" ,:' ·''i ·i• Total .A,mount Deferred:,, ... , · . ,, ., :AMO.LINT DUE·.AT APPLIC.ATION: Pa ments: Amount '"/! :$14,i:8a4.oo $65.00 ·· ··$205:2a $118.oo· $145,272.28 $12,316.50 ,; ' ' $157;588.78 · .. ~,~};J'oi;.,t:e.•',d,·· ~~~r{1nt !~pe ' , .. CkloglD ... . Amount $!195.08 $12,026.70 $"145,067.00 ·. 4/21/2005 Check ·· · · · .··111312005 ... ·· '-'Check .... ,,.,.... ·:,:•:r.:7·:.,.···· ... · Total Payments Received: (' ,,:11.,,•,i'''' • '•·j' '·,: ,'1-1· ', •CURRENT,(Excludespet11~red.Amou'lt): . ' ' . ' ' . ' ' ' Total 'Balanbe: ·. I, '$0.00 . e'r',-,:,, ,v::·· ,-_ J, 85.00 85.00 0.00 Deferred Due Now ,: $144,884.00 $65.00 $205.28 $118.00 $0.00 $145,272.28 $12,316.50 i', '' $0.00 $1571588.78 Check# .•. .4304,4. 4304 ''t' ·4535,· ..... ($157,588.78) $0.00: -. -.... Page 2 of3 Disclaimer Language for Permits under Project Management Based on permit information submitted by the applicant, the Department of Development and Environmental Services has determined the amount of review fees for the subject application. The fees shown do not include ancillary permit fees, project-related mitigation fees, or any other fees that are passed through to the applicant from other agencies or as part of the project's environmental review. Fee estimates are based on information submitted to DDES by the applicant prior to finalization of the permit application. In addition, estimates are determined by utilizing historical data gathered from projects of similar type, size, and scope. DDES's fee estimate is subject to revision under conditions including, but not limited to, the following: 1) Unknown or undisclosed site or project issues 2) Changes In the project 3) Incomplete information from applicant 4) Errors in applicant information or submittal 5) County code fee changes 6) Appeals Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. All fees must be paid in full before DDES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. For billing questions, please call 206-296-6659 ... ,~ Page 3 of3 Permit Number: LOSFR017 Statement Date: 8/9/2006 Hours Detail Function Task Name Workdate Hours .: .. A~~t~·~'S.i.riQ:$·en,i~(1·• :,:;rt:1 1 !":·i,·•; :·i ·::::!::.A~~t~·iSi~g · i::.'JJ":'.ff!J!:?;'r·, ;~ , :·:::::c:-:!i!.::-:!:!,:. :;:;:_:::'.fiS~fi~:48.~';jarj.i.SE!) . ~4(!1ioOt:.... .O:$Q Project Management Project Management Fee Estimating Florent, Raymond 4/19/2005 1.50 :P.i,ojed M~r,agernen.t ,,, .. , '" .1.:. i.,Pr~j~~-.¢Qq~!n:~~19~· .......... ' . .• .. ..._.~.: ~: ·:· .. · .... :. ~T~r-~.QJ,. 8~Y-~i~i. · ·····-~~ 4!2ii?p05 ·_o.so Final Review Permit/ Plan Review Van Patten, Steven 4/27/2005 2.50 _ ~fo}eC(M8)i3Q'elll·enf .. . ... )~:rpj8Cf'¢j:IOiitJ~·atiO_ii-, i'..'.' .·' ' , . .' f:io,eni,Rayi,ioriii ··• ·. 412t,2oos o:2s Final Review Permit/ Plan Review Van Patten, Steven 4/28/2005 4.25 ,, .'·F:.i_ri.81;B.8VJ8.V/'r:,:>·i' -· \·.:::r\f 1:.~~if,ilf/.P.ial'I .. R~~!.~W 1:::::i;).':; (!);:. ·:·,;'!:r\i, ·. : ::::IvanJ?~tter, s1~iien, : . 5f?/?905,. ·.·•. s.oq Project Management Project Coordination J=.in~! .~eVI~\\'.-... ..-\··· -. _T:'' .. -:.e~tfuj_i_( P!~"6J~~Yiti~.t ·-~ ~ Florent., Raymond 5/2/2005 0.75 . : '..\t~nP~J!~!',sieven -· ~@/2.66.L.. 9.oo Final Review Permit/ Plan Review Van Patten, Steven 5/4/2005 8.75 Finaf~e.viev1 · ·. ·1:eiinit'/P1~n•Review· : . ' :~::'.'.2."'.'.: ~· :::···.·:":~-·~2a.n'.P~Jte:n:'."s·t_ijY~h:'.'..: t"r;-·-~j~J.2095"_ ,, _9._QO Project Management Project Coordination Florent, Raymond 5/9/2005 0.75 ,:J?.F:Jn.~l:R~YJ~Y{,:;:;:'. i'.:'i:ii.'i i . ;.)~~.rmtt/'!:I~,r,-.8~Y.i.~.¥V~ ; i' ,,I. ,., .. : .. •. ~{.~Q:~~~.~.Q;·~§.!~Y~r: .'.5f1~/fQ9.~.. · .. i.?~ Final Review Permit I Plan Review Van Patten, Steven 5/26/2005 1.50 . ~li6~1 R~V-ie:~. . . ·-.. -.... -.. -~-:.P._~nll~LP..ia'n)~eY.i~\'L.:. .-. :·:· .. ~.:-~·-· . : .:.Y~ii:P.ift~~ ... ~te·yen -~ . ~13jl?"o'05. fQO Final Review Permit/ Plan Review Van Patten, Steven 6/3/2005 4.00 eng·ineer1ng _R8\~i·ew··~·: .. , .. ·;·: ;·>:'TP:8iwi.t tPJSri 1R.8X!~V(;::':_ .)i!!l 1 ···:·: ·;~··:t'.WC@~tWyi(i(.':·::,: ... ,. I'/.--... '.s/2°0/io.Qs ·,:_'2·.aq Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review Wong, Wylie 6/20/2005 1.00 ~iria1:R~yj~~ ·: ' . '' '., e,I i:Jir.rri)t.'f..P\~n)3~Y!~.~:.· 'I . • ... y~~ F..~_ft~rl, .. $!~veh 6f29.J?P9~: 0.25 Engineering Review Permit/ Plan Review \,/Vong_, Vilylie 6/22/200~ 0.70 i=incif ~evie.w~. ' ··~--. . . P~/Olif/ p·1~fl}{ey_Jij_~:· ... '.':~:..Vari.P.~he.h":·:stti~ei,'_ , 1?128/2005. ('5Q Final Review Permit/ Plan Review Van Patten, Steven 6/29/2005 2.50 , :.Pi0j.8ci'.M~~~98'111'~'1tr'.: :'.'.f'.:1.!:iJ~.rQj8~(¢·o.o·~iri'a,tl~~-:i '·,:·r ,,, r·> .. 1.~·1cir~:6.i:"'R'a'Y.i,j·pnct': ;·f3i?~-t~.Q_Qtt. .:9:~_s Final Review Permit I Plan Review Dye, James . . . 6/30/2005. 0.50 : -. ~jn~.1.88¥,i~W..... ': ... , -. 1 ."', ~:i,I '"' :. ~-r} . ."'. .. :. i ~~-in,,i(l. ~1.ai_f~.~.vi~vi.~ ... , ... :. :· .. j.,:. " ',:·::: .:::;yc!n J~~Jf~.J>le.Y~i.: .§@91~96~ --· ---3.06 Project Management Project Coordination Florent, Raymond 6/30/2005 ''Jin3fR"e.~i8~i',L>> "'"'"'"'. : Pe@)f/_Pia:.n:.Aev·,e\;,~1_·1~:·: ... : ~··-~~~ . ----·~-'" .. : ·::~·:·:::M:_"YahJ>aH,e_"n,.·s·iev·~rC:"'' '}£5l2°6cif ~'. .. Final Review Permit/ Plan Review Van Patten, Steven 7/6/2005 :. : Erl9frt88ri~·g')~8.Vi8W "··1· :!/: j.·,·:."F.)Eii_ni)fl.P18_n.'.B~V.i8_~J-;;?r'.ii1i.i:t'.;:'i:,:.'i'.:L:.':::L:;/C:T;[;i~1,.,ii!;:::: :i::.i,WQ~·g, ·WY.i\~;.:., . --· .. -,. 'jfl.f?bfJ_~:·.:·: Final Review Permit/ Plan Review Van Patten, Steven 7ll/2005 '·: ~l,11a1 R~\lie~ .. Pei'mft I P1ari'Ff8vieW --· --· "\!Sri ),atte-n.·st8Ve'n 7/1112005 Final Review Permit (p'l8i,' Re~ieiW ,. -v·a-n ·p·atten.·stel/eri 7i13/200s Total Hours Worked: 1.75 o:so 1.00 .1.00 0.25 3.75 2.25 85.00 soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Summary of Charges and Payments Applicant: SBI DEVELOPING, LLC Activity Number: KURT WILSON Project Number: PO BOX 73790 Development Number: PUYALLUP, WA 98373 Permit Type: 253 848 0820 Status: Description Cotiritet'S~n>itei~~e~ ••···· SUB TOT AL CHARGES: I ',I)' lll<:lllS pescripUon Check# .... ~hecldog_i~ Check 4391 82925 ' Payee " 'SB! DEVELOPING LLC Date Entered 57i9;21fo5 ' SUBTOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Page 1 of 1 L05PC044 L01POOl6 CHANGE RET/WCI Amount $i'o:i.64 $102.64 Amount . ---· . ($102.64) ($102.64) $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DDES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DDES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.0. ~----------~-~--~ . . _,. --. ' . soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of I Summary of Charges and Payments --=--------------, Applicant: SB! DEVELOPING, LLC KURT WILSON PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 · char~l:S Description Counter Service Fees Finance Charges Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: . Perm it Type: Status: ['''/'' ~r': "' . HOURLY F'ilil: Ehgiri~ering'PianRb~iiw' :·,; •:,,:; SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Description Check# Checklogid ~h~.c~. ·· · .48.Qt ,· 88447. . ... ·· I , , '"'" • w,", Check 5409 94959 SUB TOT AL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Payee : jsiJ:ievtQ'ifiBq\~¢ "·· SB! DEVELOPING LLC Date Entered ... )Qi2§!}Q05. 5/15/2006 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the provided to ODES at the time of application. L05PC081 LOIPOOl6 CHANGE RET/WCJ Amount $]02J~' $4.16 $36:i3 $143.03 Amount . ($I06.80) ($36.23) ($143.03) ($0.00) For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate In effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid In full before DOES Issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Summary of Charges and Payments Applicant: SBI DEVELOPING, LLC KURT WILSON PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 Description Bldg Fire.Flow Revie:.V .· ! •• Counter Service Fees ~ensAreaRev.~~/.,Compb(.·:,•,,, · , ·.·· HOURLY FEE: Appeals-Lusd Eng. Review •·. I. ·y,, "''"" "" .,.,. ·•.•· '.'"'T·"·•• · ,.._, ...... , ,,,, .. , HOURLY FEE:. C:ritical area ri:w.iew · • . ' · · HOURLY FEE: Engineering Plan Review HO URL y FEE: L,i~d Usej>liitini~g .. HOURLY FEE: SEPA Appeals i' ;ht. ' .,· .' HOURLY FEE: );EPA R.eview • ,,(; ' , r : fii;: , , I . •• ' , • SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: ·;~1-,,, .. ,·1·:,,··w, .... ·,··1·,··,· .:.-,t,' !1 "'"'Ii'"' Page I of2 LOIPOOl6 PRE-PLAT RECORDED Amount ii' ' . $192.50 $440.00 $682..00 $897.00 $3,934.50. $22,833.45 $27, 729:00 $621.00 $6tioo $57,395.45 Description Check# Checklogid Payee Date Entered Amount 'c:.nec~, .. -.. · . -\97,;·-·. :~.-. :: : ~P~Iti!t?I?:~s,~~0}¥(t:if{s]ii:i¢~f~§--.·· 'iri,!2001.. , ..•. ·<3,fi;,412.50) Check 156 40979 US LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES 9/7/2001 ($682.00) Check . ;r:, z.22',·. 4~,1ifF'1 vs'.i:A}i6j:iEyEfQpii~NtA§~QQIAl'g$:·, j{1?2002 •.• (~)W.20) Check 241 47108 US LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES 4/4/2002 ($396.00) ch~ck 257 . '<iso69 D$[A}{Di>:il~)~i:Qi>ivlgi-lf._6s~qc::iA:rjl_s' ' 5i9/2oo2 ($?59:oo) Check 278 48975 US LAND DEVELOPMENT 6/5/2002 ($4,125.00) 'ciieck ... ; . ,293 . -.. 4?ffs .. u~ LAN'P DEV)oLQ('.f.:!E:N''J'A§S.OCIA. TjlS . .?/5/2002 • . ($2,145.00) Check 313 50878 US LAND DEVELOPMENT 8/6/2002 ($561.00) check .·. I • • • 3'.28 511705 ::· i4S.LA@ E>E.\i.E\()r~EJ-.T . • 1 W6i2002 ',!,· . (~~~§.QQ) Check 342 52640 us LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES 10/8/2002 ($454.35) 'chick· ')As. . . )~.5J9 ... ~):is !,ANQfiiiyg.r,.QP!y1ENfASS0C:l~TES : : l 1/6/20()2' . . ($_2)43.0_()): Check 357 54507 US LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES 12/5/2002 . ($2,805.00) Check · , · .. 372 .:?s~o·( ... , ys'(A)-J'P:DE\/t,{i5i>ME:J::lfA.SSQCIAfgs .. 1fi12§.6j , (~1,914.00) Check 386 56349 US LAND DEVELOPMENT 2/5/2003 ($2,712.00) Check ' 406 \ jii{i6 .Us'.l,~NP.i:JgvELOP¥Ei~)(AssociArn_s ·. '4/~/200.3 ($5,962.50) Suspense Account. 43:3.... 59357 US LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES 5/9/2003 ($11,012.40) Check _}6} 6.2.23.~... us'D\NDDEVELOPMENt',AssociA'.fEs iil'iiiooi ., (S3,1i!S:ss) Check 487 64247 US LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES 10/6/2003 ($324.30) C:l)eck·.·. . .·.1~,I', ,·, .M.~56.· ·' .:. LUS.l/ir-1)) t>i::y1;;i,9rM'i:;~Tb§§ciG , . , :_~ 11/6/2QQ} , .. , . (~ ['.24.20) s.oc 1'.iv1m:11ts Description Check Check# Checklogid Payee Date Entered 709 66232 U.S. LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES 12/5/2003 ¢11ecF •' ::''''?" •• ,., ·r,:·•,• 0 • f" ,.,.,•,••• •·;-•••••"•'" •·••' -~ >'"""° '"'"••••, •O•,,,oo, • "" ,-o,o•-,-.o• <, ,,,•~---,,-.,-,00, .,._._,,,, ,•,•--~ .. --M'~ -· ·"'' •·--• • 1•1 ,r >77g •. ,,:,:, ,6J.2.76,.c,·. ;'·,·U.s~,: I,;AJ::lQP!:l.Y.EhQP1,1J;:N.T 1.A$\>QQL~'.fE!i·.. 11))/?0Qi,' ... Check 1025 70652 US LAND DEVELOPMENT 5/6/2004 SUB TOT AL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Page 2 of2 Amount ... ($~7.60) . .' ,,,($1J.40) ($72.45) ($57,395.45) $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the Information provided to ODES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate In effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid In full before DDES1ssues.f:ina1Approval,T.C,Q. orC.O. soc DOES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 9, 2006 Page I of9 Hourly Charges Detail ----------------, Applicant: SBJ DEVELOPING, LLC KURT WILSON Activity Number: Project Number: LOIP0016 PO BOX 73790 PUYALLUP, WA 98373 253 848 0820 Development Number: Permit Type: Status: PRE-PLAT RECORDED -------------------~-~----~-=~===================== Function AP· LU/Subd/SEPA Appeals Task/Description Name Org Workday Hours Amount -Hearings /L~gai"Process _, .. ·. ·3:;i~usse.~, Kimberly . 34§{ 06/3.Q!2.Q~3 . ' 4.5 · · l;62J:oo Hearings / Legal Process Whittaker, Bruce 34 73 06/27/2003 1.5 $207.00 ·_He~j~gsi.Li,g~]'P~~iess: ... · .-.·:wl)i~akb;,~.:;;cI''--·· 3{,~----· Q~!;)Oj200? _. ·····-....... TQ_ .. . }1}1,0~ Hearings / Legal Process Whittaker, Bruce 3473 06/30/2003 Subtotal AP Function ER -Engineering Review Task/Description Name Org Workday • ,, ..... p. · ··T1 pf'····il··-,, . ., ··c,,, .. , ... , , ••. · •• · n ,.,,,. 'T' •.• , ..... ,.,,., ···:·T,. ,.. T_'_:i_·_4_1_·_ i_··_·._._,_i_··_o_J1_.1 si_2_0_·_0_· __ 4:_•_;;1_,._,_·· i. erm, _ ... al)_ e_y,ew_,•: ;-'. .'.· ... :. y __ e, .1\111eS'.!'.. . .... Permit/ Plan Review Foley, Steven 3473 11/18/2002 ·, ,,, '",:·:: ··.·r,·>·: '"''"':;:":,• '"!".:::,"!' ••:'T' . i' 1"·-, ·.·";<;: ("-l'""'c'":'.,! ·.::;;.\'.;.·r:/r:·::"'·::·i ·;:q':!"""' "" · !' ·.·····:··· '/"""j ... ,, .. ,.,.,_-··;.·-:··: P~rn:i1t I PI\Ul_Rev1e_w. :'. • · '.Fol~y, Stev!'n..'. i , , ,,.: '. :: 1, ;:lf\')3: '· •:1.2_ o.~.10.Q2 I'.': Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 04/02/2002 . Perrnitfil'lriI1 1Review 1 -Whitta~er,Brt1ce: ., I•.' !}~73 '"°c104!9"i.l20Q~ \:> Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 04/04/2002 Permi\ /:P;lan Review' "' ii ~itt~ker,8,~Ee " . ". 3473_ :,,Q4/IS.(?90:2 i Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 04/16/2002 P,fo1i\l ~Jiin)t!'xt•i,..... i. ·: I .··;:·, MJ[tt~~~;Jfrii9.i :,· " .. "':i.473-01/1?/~902 Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Ilruce_ 3473 04/23/2002 · 1 ,l'!'miit /gl\!!)R,evj~w, . • _Whjtt*er,J3rnst . 31:73 : . ,Q4/24/7QQ2 Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 04/25/2002 Permit/ Plan Review , ... Whittaker, 13ruce . .. 3473 , . _\)4_/29/2002 Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 34 73 05/02/2002 Permit/ Plan Review Wl)ittaker, B_rt1ce. 34 1ff . 0_5/07/2002.. Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 05/09/2002 """ ''": "" ' • l • """' .,, Permit/ Plan Review. Whittaker, ~ruce '347~ . 05-115120_02· Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 05/16/2002 i>em\iii p,~,; Review · , ·· WJiiffiikiiianice~ ''""J413'1 'osl111200J'· ... Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 05/21/2002 r .. J:>~rrrl.fr/Plriri'k~'Vfe·~, ::·· .. ,rt_''_ti:i···'_':i''.St~~1iliik¢1{BiuC·f:;::i.r:1 {1·1~;:·_·.-;,_3~·73 1.·'.?'.'. :_·q~[i,f/iQ_Qt' .. I'.'.·~:~·:._ · .· 'r 1 i Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 06/13/2002 ,. *• • · "' ''"'" •. · ..... , ~ ""'·'""""I' ... , "'l''T""'"'•f'"'P !l ·"·' · ''":'''" .. ···-:,,··1:'' "T"· '"•'(""'. '"''fl'I"''' 1· .. ,.,, ,.,. "l'',I''' .,,,., ........ , ..... , >''' ,,. ; , ... :""!"'"'''' .. .. . .•. Pemiit/Plruj_Revie«'. . 11> .'J'.' · Whitta.ker,Bn1c_e 1,·',:,1 !}4_7~\: .. 0§/1'1/2002 .. :' [\'•' Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 07/02/2002 2.0 11.0 Hours 'i:1, ·'))·; 1.0 $276.00 $1,518.00 Amount l;12;4s $132.00 ].O • :, $13}00 1.0 $132.00 !..! , 1.0. .,.$132.00 1.0 $132.00 . , L.t .....•. , .JI98,oo· 1.0 1.0 3.0 $132.00 ;$13~.oo $396.00 .......... JO $26_4,CJO 1.0 $132.00 ····· f:s-·-· · l19s:oo 2.0 .J.O. 1.0 ···ro · 2.0 1.0 $264.00 . $132:00 $132.00 j;i'li:oo $264.00 $66:0o $132.00 '_To _ ~''$13ioo 1.0 $132.00 :;:(o · · -.· $132:oo 1.0 $132.00 soc Page 2 of9 ' Task/Description Name Org Workday Hours Amount r (, Pe~:ff ?:,P~~--~byi~\YJ(i'!i.':;r',1( Wl!i~~11~tla,i:uct:' 1:r11,~+1:1i :1::<i7io'.iZi<itjr ,'r.:····,-,, ........ T:O. 1'i 1$13:{og Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 07/11/2002 1.0 $132.00 Permit/ Pl.an R~v.iew, \viiittaker, Bru£i~ .. _·:i4z"f Q9/.1Ji200~ 1.0 $132.00 Permit / Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 09/13/2002 2.0 $264.00 J>ermit/:Pi~ Revie\v . ' wBitta1<:J,i,ariice ' ·,3413 -,: <>9716_/._2_0_ ·_o_·.·.2.; .... : .. :._.·1_:Ci · .. ··. $_ 1_·_3_--.2 .. :.·_o_ o_ ·_, ..... ... .... . ..... . .... .. .. . ,. ..... . ..... .... . . . . Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 09/19/2002 1.0 $132.00 i>ermli i i>1a11 ReYj~\v. . :wi,iiiiiki,;'s~..:~ :,: :··, 'jf1E:i:i\iJQiZioo2::: ··· i.o ··· Ii:i2.oi} Permit I Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 10/07/2002 2.0 $264.00 · )Yl)itta~e.r,131}!9~ 3473 10/09/2002 · 1.0 $132.00 ----s-,-·--·· --···=·· " -... Permit/ Plan Review ' .,.. ·······-·-· ...• Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 10/10/2002 1.0 $132.00 • . , Pirmilf Pl~n ~~yie\y:;;:,::u ' .iWhittaker,\BrUc~'i , tJ i.i .i 347:if [iJohli2062\'i ....... : ... ,.:.. .. .: ;2,s .: $3~<i:QQ Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 10/22/2002 3.0 $396.00 Permit/ Plan ReYie; ... whi~erj,i_rucf=~.. •. :)473 . "i 012;112901 . . ..1.0 . $1_3.2.00 Permit I Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 10/24/2002 1.0 $132.00 Permit/ P_Iari Review .. Whitta~er, Bruce E'i:i' : 10/28/~o.oi. 2.0 $2'6{00 Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 34 73 10/29/2002 1.0 $132.00 .'.Wh.·_ i_«_·a_'_ii_~_1 r_1_,:·_:_B_··· __ ._ru_.,_ .. '_c_·_~-?? T? ;;i347'J;:1J' j iii'liii:iooi ·oi.s ·;_ ·_$66_ :00 -, r ,. , , .... · •. , ..... ,,. ""' ,. "' ., '"'·· ... , •• '"' ''''"'': ''"! .,,.,,,,.,•:,.:":''•'"'''''!"'f:''f'l"l'lt' · Penn.it/ Plat1 1 !{eyie\v'', · ·Permit I Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 10/31/2002 1.0 $132.00 ·: ~w.i)i«aker,.Bruc~ 34731 111oi;i2ooi·::·:.::~~ 1s $198.oo Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 11/12/2002 1.0 $132.00 . Pertnit/J'lan~~yie,f: .. ":1.11 %foiilc.~r.J3ruc:~::;. I. "j3§7r 1 Fii;i[.~QQ2 ...•... 'i.o ... ::,.,,$Liroo Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 11/26/2002 1.0 $132.00 . -... '' ' ~ ,,, .... ,, '"'>'"'T'''' ... Permit / Pia~. Review · Whittak;er; B~ce I· 3473 iii66QQ02 ... 1:5 $198.QO Permit / Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 12/12/2002 1.5 $198.00 Permit/ Plan R~view Whittak~r, Bruc<i 3473 1]2/16/20:92. 2.5 $330.00 Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 12/19/2002 1.0 $132.00 . Pei:m\t / J>l~n Review:, . , , . ····• .. ; .\Vhlttaker,)!ru~~: . . ..: ,1.~473.< J l:!/20iz\)Q2 ·· , :. l.O $1}:i.OO Permit / Plan Review P~~ii I Pl~n R.;view. Whittaker, Bruce 3473 01/06/2003 1.0 $138.00 ·. wh1tt:~k~,. a;£. 3473' oi13112003 .. . 1.0 $138.oo Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 02/03/2003 4.0 $552.00 P~rmi! (~I~n.il~yiew .: ', ,, .. , . . Wjlitt*.~f.)3i=\ic~:: i)41E')2l9+1266f 5.0 $690.00, Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 02/05/2003 4.5 $621.00 "" : \:.~~fl!lff!: f(~ ::geyJ~~?t!Jti'~111:!T :::: :(:W£Iij~ft~.hlse:::t~~!: \1 ;:·:::;:~:; ~At~]~1?9~!§'.6(~.[o$·:·::·[u ::~~~~·::.-~:·:1::·:·:·:::::·1 ::'.:·:·r.o ~ t 3t99: Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 02/12/2003 2.0 $276.00 ,Permit I Phm R~yie\V. '~-:· • '., ::%.itt:aker, Bi:oce:. :: . ·.)4'7f.:.:o~/2~?Q°OI .... 2.0 . $276)0 Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 02/28/2003 1.0 $138.00 Penµji/pIJnRevie)i:i \Vhitt~ker;'~Ql;i 1,_,))47'.( Q~IQJ.ff09f .. , . i:s . $~()7,00 Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 03/04/2003 1.0 $138.00 J>ermiiiPtan Review . whiiiaker: Bru~e. . )473 o'l/0572003 ..... , ······· 2.5 $3_45.oo Pennit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 03/07/2003 1.5 $207.00 l'~iinit I Ptrui;R~vi~w , jyhittak.ir, ~ruce ; 3473 ~-·o:ii1012003· 1.5 $207.00 Hearings Whittaker, Bruce 3473 03/06/2003 2.0 $276.00 . Hearing; )\Vhjtta°k:ei; ~!]p~ ... I! !.,. },3473 i,I!' 03/Q~(?QQ3 '' 6.() $828.qO Hearings Whittaker, Bruce 3473 03/10/2003 5.0 $690.00 . Field Che~k : . .foley;sfeien_ .. j,i7{ _ "'i'i/14/2002 2.5 .. $3;JQ.OO Field Check Whittaker, Bruce 3473 11/14/2002 3.0 $396.00 Subtotal ER Function PR -Land Use Applications Review :r_ask/Descrip_!(o_n, . Permit/ Plan ~eview Permit I Plan Review Permit/PI~ Re~iew '' '' • ' .... ~··' ' ' ', .... ,' "' ''": .. , •. : ! Name BuH,Trishah ,·.· Bull, Trishah . $1il]:):rish~ Org Workday 13464 ' 09j1J/2001 · 3464 09/13/200 I j~~4 ; .. 0212.~i~i)Qi 113.0 Hours ...... ,.1.,0. 1.0 .,0,5 $15,177.45 Amount ·-~q2.oo $132.00 $66.00 soc Permit/ Plan Review Cheshier, Beth 3473 07/16/2001 .• ',,, ,Pentiit{ p]iiriiR~~ie'w •: ,;. , .. ,' ,',,'.': .. ':,_·c.·.· .. • .. h.,is.-.h_··.·.·.1_' .. e,,r,·.1.;.B ........... ·.th.·· .. ··.: .. ,,·.:,,,:1_,,,'.r ... ·1 .. · ... ! .: Jj347j'' '61111iz601r < , ,_,., • • .,,rn,.,., ,,,,.,,,, ' • " ,, '"~''""'''" , '''' 'a,,;., ~'h, I , ; -,.rnl '"'"'"'"'"'"""'''j, '"" "'"'"' ''" ,,><>•,>, M>,,,»J Permit/ Plan Review Cheshier, Beth 3473 07/19/2001 ... Permit /Plim Review . .. .· _ ,S::l\!§l\i,r,.~~!h .... , ... ,.,_ ; ., .J1.?f, QZ(Pf1QO I_ Permit/ Plan Review Cheshier, Beth 3473 07/30/2001 · i>emiiiJtia,n~e~T.".:,· ····· · • ::: .. · c11~ibi~{ijei!i ·: : ... _:::i<i1f:. .. ot/3i)ii>o i · Permit/ Plan Review Claussen, Kimberly 3464 06/26/2003 1 ! ·1.R~fni#-t P}~-iJ~~Yi~jy;Ji.-!'r)):!·i·r,;:,:I~:1:::;_·[~~~~~~tltJ{µp~~dY.?. ···,·;,:·1::.3-.4.~fi~J:Q~/3J)t~PJ>t:-·_-~!.· Permit/ Plan Review Scharer, Karen 3464 07/16/2001 Permii i 1'.lai! R,ey\~w '· , . jc-~ar~i; Karfg :; -)46{ ~09!04/2QQi. --- Permit/ Plan Review l'eITllit / Plan Review Permit/ Plan Review . PertniUPian1ll~yie~ · Permit/ Plan Review Permit i Plan Review . Permit / Plan Review Permit ii>ian Review·· .. --. --· Scharer, Karen 3464 03/13/2002 scharer,Karen_ .. 3464 6:i/(ji:foo2 Scharer, Karen 3464 03/13/2002 ;)~Rharerf[(!!l'~lt,: ... ,, .. :.,./'146~ 94!1ii7~!>'Q:?.· -· Scharer, Karen 3464 04/18/2002 Sch~rer, K~reg' 346:f. , I O/O'Y?OJJ2 Scharer, Karen 3464 12/17/2002 ', S_ch!!fer, K,rren " _ 3464 1iz/jg12()oz Permit/ Plan Review Scharer, Karen 3464 01/29/2003 i ,;'.i>emilt/•PlanR;,vi~wi ,I ,. ,,,, ,,,: ,:Scharer,,I{~r~i{' 1:,i I i)4~4': §i7i?f7QO~U i.,i. Permit/ Plan Review S~har_e_r, [(ar~n 3464 ~4/22/~0_03 Permit,/ Piiin 'RevT~ ' ~charer, J<,aren_ . '. ' a, j~64' ' 06(24/2003 Permit/ Plan Review Scharer, Karen 3464 06/25/2003 l'eITlliilPian Revie* ' ··:Wliiitjik~r;'Btuce:. =-,,:··~473,::_if1i16}I<iQI : .... ,,, Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 07/18/2001 I ,. ,, i>i,'i,,ii1fi>1~11':R~vi~w :r .. i·, 'ff.,:,(i:r 7Mii~;;,;:~m~f:1, !,,,,,., :THiJfjg~jQ~/~QQ(:,· .. ·.,. •.,,ii,, ... ,,. Permit/ Plan Review -·---· ... ' .,,.. . ., . -i: >' fermit / Pl,µi Reyi_ew. Permit/ Plan Review Permit/ Plan Review i.. Permit/ Plan,Review Permit/ Plan Review Permit/ Plan,Reyie'Y Permit/ Plan Review Permit / Plan Review . · Permit / Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 08/06/2001 .. ,.. --·-· ....•••• ,=,··· ·-: ""!' '"" ·-'."""" ·-.. -·---· -----". ----·-· ·----z---·-- .. L ........ Whittak~r;_Elru£e., ,_ .. )173 , __ Q,8/31/'.!_00I Whittaker, Bruce 3473 09/04/2001 Wlii_ttiiti•i;i3rui;;: ··. ' .. · , ... 3473 .:··o!i1o~L~Po!. : - Whittaker, Bruce 3473 09/06/200 I ·· :.,1'l~Iu~k~~;l:lru~e, :!:l}i'•i i'ii:ii~1~••.•:r@1/oz129§E•·••:. Whittaker, Bruce 3473 09/11/200 I . · ....... _WJiittaker, Bruc.e )4~f 69111~691· . Whittaker, Bruce 3473 09/18/2001 Wll[tfuker, Bruce ·_··· ... ·. 3473 0972,V:foo i Whittaker, Bruce 3473 09/28/2001 L75 3.0 0.5 Page 3 of9 $23LOO ... J1:iI99: $264.00 $264,00 $396.00 $}~1.00· $69.00 . 2,9 ,$27~§6 0.25 0.5 $33.00 $6f00 0.25 $33.00 ···· cO:is) ($33.oo) 0.25 $33.00 '.2:Q ,.,,,, ; : -~2~{9Q 2.0 L7~ 2.0 L5 2.0 $264.00 $231,00 $264.00 · $19§:oo $276.00 . J,.5, •; · . i?07.00 0.75 L2 0.8 ",sr~-•'t"~o··· "• .M,~·,h -•••• LO 0.5 LO 3.5 4:o LS 1:5' 2.5 LO LO LO LO $103.50 $165.60 $110.40 $132.00 $132.00 $]3iOQ $66.00 .. _ ~132})_0 $462.00 . $5)8:09 $198.00 '' fi 9.8,()() $330.00 $132_,00 $132.00 $132.00 $132.00 P~rmitf.l'Ia,n ~~view., 1 !, ; . , , : ,\V)littakir, ~111ce , :.: ~4]3 1 ,:,19/jf/2001, ... , '.r ., ·,: .. ,l,Q ti}Z.oo Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 10/19/2001 · . Whittaker,B __ l}lce . --3',ffi _ II.!0917901 .... I. ·-·· ·-· Permit /Plan. Reyiew .. Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 11/14/2001 q ··---,,-•-"r"" ,. ·:· ,::-:"'."'''.'"' , .... , ... 1; ··: , .. , .. " , .. ,,\, ;;1•:""'"''"':""'''"'·'.T'T"'"""·. ·--~---, """"' · "'" ., : , Whit!'!ker,Elruc,e: .... , .~1!2. Jl/15./'.!_00I '"'" :•···-.. ··:"• ""•' __ ....... ,' · r•.· ·'['I' t"'f Permit/ Plim Review · . . . Permit / Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 11/19/2001 , .·,;; : P~rijiit/.r ia,nievi~f, "' .... ,.',.' .•• ;'1: ,\Vl\ittll~~r; Brucli' :'iI'.: , , i' r ~4.if ,. gj:tl l/2.9,02 . · Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 01/17/2002 ;Pe11)1it / J>lan Revi~\v. Whittaker, Bruce . }'!Tl ' O_I ii'.872092 -'' LO · .. ,,·i.o" LO $66.00 _$1}2,00 $132.00 $13'2:oo $132.00 ,! ' ', 9-? . --::, .$66,~0. LO LO $132.00 $132.00 soc Task/Description Permit I Plan Review Pennjt[l'lan Rev\•."'- Name Org Workday Whittaker, Bruce 3473 01/29/2002 :\\')littal<~r.~ru£~ ' 3473' Ql/30/~9Q2. Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 3473 02/05/2002 Permli/piari R~v~ew ., .. ,. . wii(ttaker, Bruce '' '347'3 '02io8!'2Jio2 •--.. Permit/ Plan Review Whittaker, Bruce 34 73 02/25/2002 1 , • · wiiittli~~.-Brill~' i:' rn r341J,i'10:ili21z'oo2': , ~-·····'"'''''··'·' ,.,,.,., .. , ~.,,.. ·-~··· ,, .. ~,.~.\. ... -""'''""'~··--"•''"'''' Traffic Review Mc Manus, Aileen 3464 09/04/200 I l'ra.fficil~~1.;w _, .. .1,, , .. ,,, :.tifoM811~i.iH~e~.:C: ·;., ,.3.4§{•,.§i/Q~/2.QtfE '. Traffic Review McManus, Aileen 3464 09/04/2001 Tram£.R_eview ,' ·····-·· ":_)1~M°~~i.A1Tie~.-~ :. :I1~~-= ~~/06/?0_()_l~- Traffic Review McManus, Aileen 3464 10/16/2001 Pre--ttiru'ihgc.;,if'i.-'.ence, ''' · · si:friii~r;i<ii~.~~-:::·:· .'i4-6{~ 'oz([Bi?iii!L:.· Hearings Scharer, Karen 3464 03/06/2003 -·,, ,.,.,., .. ,., ·· --, • -Y'""" .. ~·:~(:>>"'""'"~': t: :•' r-;··•·r·"l"l'""i/!"'' •··1,•·,· ',,-, .. ·:-·1·• , •. • ._ .... ,, .. , '""'''' t •. ,-'He~ririgf '~charer;J~~r~ri t :? :': ~'\ J.4i4 \•03/0~/~00~! Hearings Scharer, Karen 3464 03/10/2003 . !'rojeci C:oor4fnati<lfi,l i i' "' ::.::;-::ij41I;;'ri-isl}ah' '': ' '}4i4J: IQ7/23/?QO] ',, .I Project Coordin,ation _ Bun, Trishah_ ~i64 .... ~2(?'!f?_201 . ProjectCoordinat_ion , Bu)l, 'fri~l)ah, , ... 346.1: ... _Q7/30/2QO.L ..... . Project Coordination Bull, Tri shah 3464 08/29/200 I "Project Coordin.ation _ ·But('ri-ish!ili. 34~4 -08/3il2iiiii Project Coordination Bull, Trishah 3464 09/10/200 I 1Pi'olecf9~c\rdi11a'fi2n:, ,, It .~~ff.Ths'iiiiff ':"'' ,_3:/~1 11~"olf1191?liQ1:I :_'~ ... Project Coordination Bull, Trishah 3464 09/19/200 I ,I ... Hours 1.0 1.5 Page 4 of9 Amount $132.00 ----~- $198.00 1.0 $132.00 1:0 j'i~i.QO 1.0 $132.00 1.0 :$132Jq: (2.5) ($330.00) ) ·2.5 .. ·...... $3:iQ,QO., 2.5 $330.00 · -· .:1:s --J19s.oo 1.0 $132.00 LO $1}~190 LO $138.00 .. ::.''. : .6.0 $828.00 4.0 $552.00 ',2,0 $261,00 1.0 $132.00 . _ , Q,25 . $n,09 0.25 $33.00 o:s· · $66.oo 0.5 $66.00 , 0.5 $66,0Q' 0.5 $66.00 1. , .. ProJect<:;~Q~clinaligii,, .... ,, -····.~ul(J\ishih !:.,,. "')464 :.o?ii1i2ii,01 .. ,,., .. ,. ',. it ... $13.20 Project Coordination Bull, Trish ah 3464 09/21/200 I 0.5 $66.00 •-Projecic:°-or4}n~ffon ·-, ·siit),)'r[iliah . ~4~_4::§9i2§f;!QQ(.-.-.... 0.25 s33Jici Project Coordination Bull, Tri shah 3464 09/27 /200 I 0.5 $66.00 · Proj~ci cioorci_ii,i!iaii . __ ~;{ii, tH#ii!h __ .• _ ' :34~4 'ji91711i9oi_ ____ _ ·· ois _ $33:o() Project Coordination Bull, Trishah 3464 10/01/2001 1.0 $132.00 I°!','··-•· '"','"", "i'""''."1'"11':''" ;': ''"> I""'"' '' '.,..,.,,. P''• ,. ,,.,' •.. , .. ' , .• , ,.., -, 'Tf''"T"""I "" ""'''""' _,,,,.,,~,,,.,,,,,,.,, •...• , '"'"'"<·~•·•"'"'*"'I '· 1 'l'r6ject <;:oi?rdinatfoii , · ,! '! ! ,:·. ! -~ull/Jtish,an: ,: ::, ''Y' 346fi! 10/02/200 I !t .. ' o::is · · · ·· :: $3 'lJJo Project Coordination Bull, Trishah 3464 I 0/22/200 I 0.25 $33.00 .··,,l'roje_.ct.¢ciircifo~Ii6n:·· ··-·•·, ;,'."' '",;Jfµ[(i}iiii~f-::.;;:., ,x .,.: .. 1,,3464'::i§11i8iiI\Qf ,,, , ,,,. ' ,Q,7~ . $33,0Q Project Coordination Claussen, Kimberly 3464 07/12/2001 0.5 $66.00 -Projec(Coord.ination::,':'" ..... · .. ~ ,~ch~rer,'Kien::-: .· .... , .... _· J164--::J§ijj_7)7~Ql ... ·--· ·0.15 . . $99,_oo Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 09/10/2001 0.5 $66.00 Proje_c(C:oordination ... Scharer."Kare.'H --: _ ,. ,, ;--"i4§I .· 99.i:is12oji["'"' 0.5 , .. $66.00 Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 I 0/04/200 I 1.5 $198.00 i' '}rojecl'COO[dih~iio~ , ' ! ! I iiJ'. ssii'~te_r, \<,!irfo_i! '':' i 1 ', • ':,j}i64 ~i:{Qi0?(~96j' LO $132.60' Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 I 0/11/200 I 0.75 $99.00 ;-~~::::~9s~~l~¢~.q~4J~~t~2,~;:,1~;:j.\,.,~::1,~~···· . :§'~¥~r~,f,'"'~~~~:rl&::::r,1··;~~;i):::·:i::~I4§4jl ::i(Q[~4~~9~9I:~.: ,,,,,;L, .. Mi,>1.>M\le 1,0,.· )s1,:i2:oo Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 I 0/31/200 I 0.5 $66.00 Proje~t Coordinat,ion ---:-~shier: Karen::·,·· ·-··· .' 'i464 . ) 1/1:Jiioo 1 ... ,., ,, .... "0:5 _, $66.oo Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 12/18/2001 0.5 $66.00 'r~ojecf:c:oo~cti~ati~n·--' ··-"s~harer,Kai-e_n~~ '' "'i464,.04ioji2i'ioi --To _ __ _$132.00_ Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 04/02/2002 0.5 $66.00 · · ···· ... . .. · ·, .... , · · .,.. · .. ,, ... ,.,. , .. ,.,, .. ,, .. r:::1.·,,·3"'4··6"4' ','T"o'4'·1·1··5·;·2·"0· .. o ... 2.,.,,,"',,,.. .. · · Proj¢<;t Co(?rdi~_aJ~On:1,. • • 1 _S¢~llf.~'tJ.'~-~T~~i:i:L::"11 .:. , ............... , ~ • ,,. ... " .• "-...... '"' •• )'.o -$J3_2.oo Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 04/18/2002 0.5 $66.00 · -iJoJ~ct ¢29rdi~~iiqr . . ~sh~rer:K~ien , , j~64 • 0412:iij9Q2 : .. , .. ,-, .. ·-· --· . .. ,-Q:5. :.. , , ~,66,00 Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 04/29/2002 LO $132.00 soc Page 5 of9 Task/Description Name Org Workday Hours Amount Pro}ici C:oorcfiriaiion . T _Sc_lia?er,_Karen''. . . )46{ )i101!29[f . . .. . i{s .. . $66.00, Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 05/08/2002 0.75 $99.00 Pr()j~~i.co'ofctjnhticin, 1 , Sbh.libr; Kare~< " 1 346{['05/Q9i~:QR:icf 10:'75 . . $99:00. Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 05/13/2002 0.5 $66.00 PrnjectCoC>rdinatiof 1 1.sc.h~rfriKare.r, . 1 1 346{ ,,1Qj/!5/2.Q02 , , .. , (5 . ~66.,90 Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 05/16/2002 1.0 $132.00 , Projecj <::.ci~_rdln.~iio.n .· .... , ... L Scharer, Karen/ ... , ,. ····• .•.. }4§~ ')j'~ii[i,i~Q2 . . , •.... 0.5. $§6.oo Project Coordination ..... ~chare~,.E~en . 3464 05/_:1.~/2002 0.25 $33.00 Pr_oj°-~1¢~o~~i~~tfr,t( ,~ch,~re.r, K?~e.n · · .31~~ ... 28[14/~002 ...... o.5_ $66.00 Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 09/05/2002 0.5 $66.00 , i . P_roj~ct Coor~iri~ion.. . . . . Scharer, Karen .L,. . .. , .. 3-.4~~. .09.IQ~2QQ2. _ .. ,,· . . .· ... Q-~~-.... . ~Jii:oo' Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 I 0/08/2002 1.5 $198.00 . i>r'ojettCoordioaiJor : ·' S~h,aie~. Kar~~ ' '!! I? 13464 ='io/~j/2002 1''' 0.25_ . $33.00 Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 11/04/2002 1.5 $198.00 .. · P;oJ~ctCoor[l11,ition T ,_, sc:h~rtcr;i!(areri ifi( . )4iiJT:'!:ij/j4/~062J.:'.;'• • · '· .. ! Lo . . ,$132,cig, Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 12/16/2002 0.5 $66.00 · ,· •• Proj~cti::o"r~i~~tfori · : ~cgare,r)<!""~i,'1 . .1.,, :,3-1§4. ,, i)/i?hilqf i .·· .. 2,0 )264,oo Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 12/18/2002 2.0 $264.00 ··· •. _projec(<::9~r~fo~iioh .. : ,', .· ·, , · · · ~tc~~ii,r:R~.ren.·, ·0 · -34§4 -~ :J2t19[f@_2 :;: -···· ......... 1.2 : }i:i.2§0: Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 01/06/2003 0.5 $69.00 P.t:oject_C::o·of~in~ti~ll-· _ .. :: .. ,S~~are,){aren: :.: . -.346~.-Olfl:l/20~~ 0.5 j>69.00 Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 01/16/2003 0.5 $69.00 . 'Proji91:c:09rd,igiign,. .. ~ -~ ~ch~r.e.f,J;,.,~.-. _ ., , : 3464 . oi1:ffi2603. . . . . ..... IT. .,.. $207.09 Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 01/22/2003 0.75 $103.50 1 ' Projfdcoordin'ittio# ''::'.~ch~i~t;R;it'i.llr.' :' ...• ·.· )46-4'' 02/Q4/2:o.03 . '. 1:0. Jii~§o Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 02/05/2003 1.0 $138.00 .···_: i>,o;ect_· 'c.·.· .. o.'.'<,.·r.·.c1_··.1n .. _at.i ... o.n.· , ., ··s.·.c.··.ii.'.~.-r. e.'r_ ,_'._i<_a_'·_r_e_·n.·· .. •,_,'. ·1 13464 ' 'oids1266f · · i .. o.. '$i38 oo' , .... ,·, .•.•... : ,,.,.1 ..... ,.............. :'r,: ': .. . : •.. Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 02/24/2003 1.0 $138.00 '. 'Project C:::oordillatiol) , , I ~c:h~¥:'/<ar~!1 . 3464,, 3ijii?i?9Q3 1.5 . $207._00 Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 02/27/2003 0.25 $34.50 ljr9ject <::o.ord_in~tiq_n . S~~~r~r, I<~ren 3464. 03/05/2()0:i" .. ·· 0.5 $69.oo· Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 03/06/2003 1.0 $138.00 Project Co!Jrdination Schare'r,l(areii . ]~§:' ... 03ZI Q/20Q3 1.5 $207.00 Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 03/26/2003 0.25 $34.50 .. _ProjeciC:oordiration"" §cha,rer,.I<areri . ""' ':J4.64_'. 037:iT/26ci'J' T Lo $i3ii.cfo Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 06/16/2003 0.1 $13 .80 · rH,je8( C,~brilIIl~l[di\f ,'Sch'a~,,,r;1I<~re,ll 1 :,· • ,:.•:,..:if~{\,o§liNiQ0.3 ,..Q.2 $..~i..2§ Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 06/17/2003 0.2 $27.60 , Project C!f>Ordin~tion . 1:1:1. :!':.·. : ' $sh~r~~.K~rilli. '/.: i, ,'.3,4§{•,;:Q~h~i~QQ3' .!:,, . . $t_?,60 Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 06/24/2003 0.5 $69.00 Proj~~i C:qg,4i~aifori. .-~h.areriJ~ri.~-. I I :, 346{,, 9?!9?/:10()3 O} . $27.60 Project Coordination _Scharer, Kar~ll--··-3464 08/14/2003 1.0 $138.00 Profrct Coordinati~n.,: .. ~ch.~r\'r, I<,a~ell 3464 .. O?fO~l?QO~ .. '"" : §.f-$27.60 Project Coordination Scharer, !(_~re.~ . 3464 09/04/2003 0.75 $103.50 Project Coordination . ::ichar~r. Karen I. • . ~464 .0?/08/2003 . oj $4i .40 Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 09/09/2003 0.2 $27.60 .. Project (:()ordination . '.•·:'!''.''TScha_Nr,k:~ien :J4i;;(1fo<1h~i2003 0;1 )]3.80 Project Coordination Scharer, Karen 3464 12/04/2003 0.3 $41.40 ... >Fielif¢beck.'' .,.... ;c:H.eshier;~~t~ ,., .. }4}3 107/23/2001_,{ LI ,6,0 . . $7~?,QQ, soc Task/Description Name Org Workday Field Check Scharer, Karen 3464 09/20/200 I ,,,FJeldChe,ck--, . Sc!)ar~r.,i(\lfer 34~1 :<>.~/Q5'4Q§L Field Check Whittaker, Bruce 3473 09/13/2001 ...... futiii~c:;int~~! .. Bull, irishhh-...... 3464. 'iohsi200(1 Public Contact Bull, Trishah 3464 12/10/2001 ~iiiili~c~1~ci ,0uff,:fr1sliaii·': \,, .... ·'•3464' 0411212002· .. · .. Public Contact Scharer, Karen 3464 I 0/25/200 I '.p~§ii.9.c~iitiif't.',''..0:: !,:;i:;i,rr;:•: ::•,sc].iit~f'.ii{.;,FiB''.. 3'.1~4/r',,•1g;2~1~00 t'•'··. Public Contact Scharer, Karen 3464 11/15/2001 ·. Publici:;on)llct .. .. ,$c~~rf,r;·~~~ , ,, .. , , J~§£ ;9i7Q~12QQ'2','.),: Public Contact Scharer, Karen 3464 01/29/2002 Pubiii,Con, i.·a .. i:i, ·.s. cha .. ·.r,-,e .. r,'.K,-.·.a,·.,,e,'.,n ... '' '·'· 3464 , oiiioi:2002 ... • . ' '"' , .• i ,d ·"·-··•" ',, Public Contact _Sc_harer,_Karen __ . 3464 03/13/2002 Public Contiici .. Scharer, Karen · 346(' !)4il~!200z' . Public Contact Scharer, Karen 3464 04/18/2002 . Public conlllci .. , . slii\ll'e,; Kare~'. 3464 os/i 6h962 Public Contact Scharer, Karen · .·pu~ac;:·co·~·~~'f;:-r~:·: '·)· ::·:·}\ 10:':i 1• ·:.-.1~~fr~~r·;:k_~r~_r(,~.-- Public Contact Scharer, Karen · RiiblicC~ntaci i , ',',:.'~c~~i\,r,K~i~r ·, Public Contact Scharer, Karen P~bli°' (::qr/~9t , . ... Sch,ar~rii<a(er· 3464 05/20/2002 r j4~1: ,9§1201zoo2 · ,, 3464 07/18/2002 . '.,jA_~,, ·, ,97/2.51,~QQ2 .... ,., .:.,.,., '' 3464 08/08/2002 }'!§{-. 0~/03!tQQf Hours 3.0 .L5- 4.o 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.25 · r __ , 0,5, 0.75 , ........ , 0.5 0.25 0.5 0.5 i:25 0.25 i:ri 0.5 · .. ,.0 ... 25. 0.5 ,,,,,.o.,.t 0.25 Q,7~ . Public Contact Scharer, Karen 3464 09/04/2002 0.5 Public Contact . iicliare~. ~aren:::. . . H§f _ ... 09/0.5/2002 .. . ·o.2s . Public Contact Scharer, Karen 3464 09/10/2002 0.25 . Pul>ii£COnta:ct '. . Scharer)faren: -. . : 34~!._ 09/30/200?._. 0 •• : ••• '" 0.25 Public Contact Scharer, Karen 3464 01/06/2003 0.25 '·i>ii1,ifccbiita:Ft''.':. ,·:r '"'f,s.,~~r.,r.'k~frri::L .. '341J:i:":'9ilQs/206;iJ.:::~: :· 0,5 Public Contact Scharer, Karen 3464 01/1512003 0.5 Pu~lk,~oniast, Public Contact Pu~ij~ Conta9i . "I .. ".,. Public Contact Public Contact Public Contact ': .. i::orrejpondence , Correspondence B ,, ' Correspondence' Correspondence B . Corresponden~~·,,. Correspondence B : . <::prre~ponde~~~' . Correspondence B . Correspondence .. - Correspondence B . c·orr~:~po~i~-~~~-' . " . "'. Correspondence B ,;·:1 J ·_'¢~rie~-p~~deri~i',P".\:~':1i··\i/:\'.r/1{:! Correspondence B ': 1S9foir~,r. [(ar~r ' j~~~i[ ,9}1(?!,!90} ' , ,.. . ,Q.25 Scharer, Karen 3464 05/27/2003 0.2 ._ , ;scliiifei,J~~,.fi · ··· .... 3.4§4.. 0~1,27120.§:i~ -· · -iu Scharer, Karen 3464 06119/2003 0.1 . schai-er, Karin 3464.. §81:i5726c>3 . 0.1 Scharer, Karen 3464 10116/2003 Bun: Trishah . . ':i464 011~3.i}oiff ull, Tri shah 3464 07 /25/200 I . i3li1Cfrishaii . 3464 , 011261200! ull, Trishah 3464 08/29/200 I : Buir, Trishah0 • ,· 3464. '091i1iioo1 . ; .I.,.~:--, ... ,, ... ,.,, . "" -., ',, .'.h ,'. 1.,-::. ,' . i ! .. ' .. "''.! , , '"'·'"" ·, ,,.,,,., .. •, ull, Trishah 3464 09/12/2001 , .)lull, .frishail , }4~4 ,99/]212.901 ull, Trishah 3464 09/13/2001 · .· Bui), -trfshah 3464 · 0912.oitoo 1 ull, Tri shah 3464 09/20/200 I · Buri:·r,f~ii_iih· •.. · ' · 'j~§1·2:09i2Ji2QQJ' ull, Trishah 3464 09/28/200 I l'\,~if;'rrishah' ,r:,;·: ,;J464' .. 'ioi§Ji2qoJ:·· ull, Trishah 3464 12/18/2001 0.2 'iii 0.5 0.25 1.25 . !l,75_ 1.25 0.5 2.0 ' 0.5 0.75 ······ · ·o:s··· 0.5 x·o.5 0.75 Page 6 of9 Amount $396.00 . $20_7.00 $528.00 $66.00 -~ -·--~ .... $33.00 · )fi.o§' $33.00 -J~Iog; $99.00 •. · $6§.0Q $33.00 $6.6,00 $66.00 $165_.00 $33.00 .. , ··1132.cio' $66.00 $}3,Qb $66.00 $66:oo. $33.00 $33.00 $66.00 $3~.oo $33.00 ······· ········· $fi'.oo $34.50 d $~9.:00; $69.00 ]}!,50 $27.60 $13.80 $13.80 $13.80, $27.60 $2§4'.00 $66.00 .... $33.00 $165.00 ...... $99,00 $165.00 $66.00 $264.00 $66.00 $99.00 , .. $66Io $66.00 ,166.00 $99.00 soc Task/Description Name Org Workday .· ., '¢~rre~pon~~nce :1 ''' • ' ''''}{uii;f~ls~iili:~.1 :. 111<': Ji6{ '}jif9/2QQI _ -. ··.· ,~orrespo_~d~n~e B. , .... <i·'1··.·./i'i..,i.i.,·_,Buulll1_.,' TTrn1.:ss· hh'ahah·.· ,, ... ,.' · • ",'· ·, ... 3~64 __ !3/19/2~9.I ... __ .' CorresJiQ!'<.lenp_e_ ".i ·. ··. I • \1_,1}::1§1,LcJ}!.t?!lQOL, ,i:,,.,. Correspondence Sch arer, Karen 3464 09/11/2001 ' I £~rresponci~ni:e: I »• ~9h.'!1'.er,_Kar~n }19~ ... Q9!_12/200l Correspondence Sch arer, Karen 3464 11/05/2001 Correspondel)ce' 111• I 11 ·, ~£.har~r;_~i\iirii' . 1}foi .;iilj3J_;!90J.,, .. · Corre~p~_ndence. Sch_ arer, Karen 3464 02/26/2002 <:on:e~p~n~en~~ .I,, 111 I S~hareE, i<afoi.. . ....... '31~{·: 05(14/2002 Correspondence Sch arer, Karen 3464 08/13/2002 Corresponclen,I .· ;;, ., .. ., I Scharet;'k1fef 3464 I i0/03/2002 .. Correspondence Sch arer, Karen 3464 10/07/2002 i .. Cgrrespon4eri~e!~-;: . , ,;, s<i~are.r,'.15~mi · .. , ,I. . • J4~~. :Jii~~~.QQI Correspondence Sch arer, Karen 3464 01/22/2003 · c.;;j.,;pon~en'cf :· · .• · ·' · 1 :~i\J\aie,:k;.;:i;r· ... __ ··1fi~4 1:0212<1!2003 ···· Correspondence Sch arer, Karen 3464 02/25/2003 Page 7 of9 Hours Amount 1.2s ·· ·· · $16_s,oo; (I :~t . . .. (~_165:00) 1.2~ .. :,,,, ' 1•1 .. $1,65,00 0.5 $66.00 0}?_ ii;:if oo: 1.0 ....... .1.,):9., 0.5 ,.,, '"""'""'"" _.,,, .. . ).5 0.5 'I.O 0.5 J..O .. 0.75 I 0.5 $132.00 ' liji,go $66.00 ... l:J:i'ojiO I ,' . Con:espo!lde1fae ', . >,; ,)ch~re.r, )<.,rren 'I. 'I J• ,; :li§~ I .Q~(26,'.20Q;J.I= I •• ••••• ,,,,, 2.0 2.0 1.0 $66.00 ·$'1:i2,oo_ $66.00 $I3i:oo $103.50 $69.00 $276.00 ,,$~76.09 $138.00 ' s1:ii:oo $69.00 ... ~3\09 Correspondence Sch arer, Karen 3464 02/27/2003 Meet{ngs r . I •• I I '.'Bujl;Tri~~.;i; ··. . .1 '3{~;1'.'. _09104/200'! 71 Meetings Claussen, Kimberly 3464 06/26/2003 'Meetings , , 1 ?Henoch,Lanny : .. )464i)Pi08(2002 ··'·· Meetings . Henoch, Lanny 3464 02/24/2003 f1e~!ings .· . ' . ,i-}cM~t1s;:A,ileen ., }i~4 I 09/_041i<\Qi 11 : : ' Meetings McManus, Aileen 3464 09/04/2001 Mfehngs ·' ·: •Mclvlai;ius,IAiiee'~ ,i' I 346i 'iii9io_4/20Q ! Meetings Scharer, Karen 3464 09/04/200 I Meetings I I I I I I ~cfrarer:iar~n' ' ' 3464_ . 09!05/?0iff Meetings Scharer, Karen 3464 10/22/200 I Meetings ·,·· I , ,, •. ,, I S~h.~e_{Karen: ' .,,,; :'}1i{i7j§124j2.QOl········· Meetings Scharer, Karen 3464 I 0/25/200 I r fyfoetit1gs I I ,,, ·,·sctiar~r;]siieii''-''' ••• '34ij,,·:gi/3Q/~0Qf.::.· Meetings Scharer, Karen 3464 04/18/2002 Me6tlngs .. " rv I -S<:har~r.~,\\'.'eri. ,_': ,, <34~4:,•04/?3/20.Qi :: Meetings Scharer, Karen 3464 05/02/2002 M~etings,~ I.·; : , · I, .. ~ . :L ·,,scF~r.er:)<."!i.~ .: .~: '3464 )9/0?!~QQ~ .. Meetings Scharer, Karen 3464 10/07/2002 · M'~etingS:',' ······ '1:·.,·:-::schru:'~r.i{Je,\."C ,,,,,,· '}i~f lolQiii§of'·., .. Meetings Scharer, Karen 3464 I 0/08/2002 Meetings . --, ~charer,,_karen, ... ,, I I Hffi'Jiiii'jfio§i ·: ,-:,-· Meetings Scharer, Karen 3464 12/17/2002 . Meetit,gs ·. , . . ·.:'.: §char~;:, K/,r_ery, , , .. ,.,, 3464' Tiiiiiiiooi . Meetings Scharer, Karen 3464 02/03/2003 I, Meetings ', , , ,, s~hareriKare~ , , ' " . 3464-~02/04i20_()3·;, , , Meetings Scharer, Karen 3464 02/18/2003 f1e~tings'. I '. ,schfiler, K,are~ . Eii:i 03/03/2003 Meetings Scharer, Karen 3464 06/26/2003 Meetings ''··.Scharer, Ka_ren ' .. :.34.64 ,,09/09/2003., Meetings Scharer, Karen 3464 09/17/2003 Report Prepll!'ation . , , . '.{::lauss~r,J<,im~eriy : .. 31~{ 021isi2oii:i'' ..... Lo 0.5 ' Q,~~ 0.3 .. <Lo). 1.0 ·,LO 1.5 I'>>>>>,,,,,· •• ii:'5 •I 0.75 1.0 1.0 },O 0.25 0.25 1.75 0.25 1.25 . --· . ',1).25 1.0 ': n • .9.:~.,., , 0.5 ifs 0.5 0.5 1.0 o:zs' 0.5 .·. 0.2 0.4 0.5 $41.40 ($f3f6o) $132.00 s1:i2.qo' $198.00 $66.0() $99.00 1 $132,00 $132.00 $132,00 $33.00 $~_3_.00 $231.00 ., .. $33,QO $165.00 )33.0() $132.00 )66cQO $66.00 $~6.oo' $69.00 $69.00 $138.00 $34.50' $69.00 , $27.60, $55.20 ~69.()0 soc Task/Description Name Org Workday Report Preparation Scharer, Karen 3464 12/16/2002 ' '.," .,.,,,"''I'""""''''"' ... ,., I"''', ........ ,.,' ··•:;,·,:_)'"."r··"'"'_'_'S'Chi{ief",""K:aret1"' ' ''F' "''l''''~-,-, .. ,,t"'"i'H,,•,,M"' ''"' ,.,,.' .,, T': .·;·· R.ePAl1 Prel)arati.oJ! .... . . ' ....... )464 ' 12/16/2002 Report Preparation Scharer, Karen 3464 01/27/2003 ' """ ,,, " ' ''"r'"" '~" \~f' I''"':• ,·,·r ",'' (' s'Cha,ret~·'R'fll'~·n ,. ,, ',·, ··:-~/:T•:·:rr•3·4(i4·;l,'i"i'cfi72"8/20'03' ll~port.f'.rep~.,:ation. .. . .. . ... , ... _ .. .... __ ..... . Report Preparation Scharer, Karen 3464 Ol/29/2003 Repoi{Prep!l"aii6n'· . '''· sciirir~r,ki/i~6 1 '···· :•·:·.·· '..::,··'.3.4~4'''':§!ZiQ/?.063 .. ,· .. ' Report Preparation Scharer, Karen 3464 02/03/2003 . [epor[}repj,ratio~ :: ... s.citi;i~"rikaieri ' :: . ' 'J4is('':02io4/2003 Report Preparation Scharer, Karen 3464 02/05/2003 · ilep~rt_frejlaration / · ·· • ' · •• J~~ari:,'.){~i:'en __ .. . . . :: ' 3'!6( . o.~061~003 Report Preparation Scharer, Karen 3464 02/11/2003 ·· .. R•rorip,eparair~"-•-···· ... · · :·§c~g;:~t;.i{ai~~::,~·: :·: ~1E· !liJ:ij/foQJ · ' Report Preparation Scharer, Karen 3464 02/18/2003 ReportPreparation. . .... ,,,.. :schl,fet;Kii?.eri ·. }i/54 fio21fJ~oof Report Preparation Scharer, Karen 3464 02/24/2003 ..... Report'Preparatiori' ,.,. ''7 • 'sd,are('kar'ert • 1 '"',34i;4'1 • 02i:is1200':l"'' • Subtotal PR Function SA -Sensitive Areas Review Task/Description Name Org Workday Permit/ Plan Review Bottheim, Stephen 3470 07/18/200 l Casey}I:aura' .. ''' ' 3470 ,097127:iool' Casey, Laura 3470 09/17/2001 ... ·. :¢.as'ey:;i:'.JG,f '' .:.fi?q:''}912,?Ji.ooT . ':_ .. Permit I Plan Review . . PeriniflPtan i{'.\vi<if Permit I Plan Review Casey, Laura 3470 09/27/2001 ·¢asey;_I1~llfK";'1:g·,~·:·i~'; ., i·t·> ·::_ "~·;i:_1_~·i}~ t9 ,,.;_1)Qt,2~4fii5or~'.:N~· · Casey, Laura 3470 04/08/2002 ' ·c· .. ,. ·· 'iT'''"" ., . ., ... ,.:r-;c·· ' 1'"'·'"''·:·.:\.4.1.·.o .. ··.• '_:io1.o .. '.1.'_i.2. 60.·.2 , : ..... as.ey, ... :.~yr~---·· , _ _ __ _ Permit I Plan Review p·e·rmit ?Pi~n 1i~{i'e~~:.··_: Permit/ Plan Review Casey, Laura 3470 l l/05/2002 . · Permit!PianRevie\v , .. K.1~1;,; fes'fi11:1 •• ..... '"". '· • •,3410 , 1013112001 Macwhinney, Elizabeth 3470 10/30/2001 · .'' ·.s1aan;J~ii' : '1' .. ' ::J1to_,(loi~iiioo1 . Permit/ Plan Review ''' ,., •. fT ..• , · ,.,.,.,... :' '•.P'.,. '· ! r':' Permit /Pla11 Revi,w Permit I Plan Review West, Lawrence 3470 07/17/2001 · · · "~1111if'1.PiariReview · '\v'est: t~wrenc,i ' )4'i0}()'iijsi2§01. Permit I Plan Review West, Lawrence 3470 07/24/2001 i Penilfr'i Plan litivie\v. , .. , .. ·.~~s(Law<~ri£(,._ ,......... ·::1E1oi§si~<Ji;io9) Permit/ Plan Review West, Lawrence 3470 08/31/2001 'w~~i;u~«-,foc• , 1 ':\410 ,'0910112001 •, · Bottheim, Stephen 3470 04/04/2002 · Ca§~y, [;a faff. .... i 347_0 1/fo/09/2001 Quality Control Review '. Coflf~r~·n1~e·; '\ I, .. "" Casey, Laura 34 70 10/09/2001 Cas~y.Laura I.. .. r34?0};io169iio9j. Conference Corif~rence 1·':" Conference Casey, Laura 3470 10/25/2001 'Cori'rete~·c·lr -,:.i·i·,-. '',:"' · "' ,,·, ;·n•• > ,'I'··•.••~':!"'.'·;', i ;', l"C" '"' • .,, .• , "'"' • i'" '' ••,,•, '"'-''""' ' . Casey, L.~ura __ .: i{,. ,: .' '((::.' ':I4.?Q,ifl,l/Q8(2_00.\. Casey, Laura 3470 11/14/2001 \' ·:i:: !,'1 'I ';·C,;:c" : 'T·•·;L 'f' O"l"";I'"; .. ·· ::':347()""'.'"'"61 /i57206i""'. -~-.',';' . as~y •. ~8.!11:~.'-':·. ! ............. ,·•· .......................... , Conference , :Gonre'fe11~e ' Casey, Laura 3470 04/18/2002 .... /C~s:~y,L~~r~. ,, ,;}i'ioi'osi677ioog .•.... Conference 1. · c;M.;f~h~~ Hours 1.0 '" "( i ,' ).._()~ 1.0 3·.0 2.0 . 3':6 2.0 · .. }I 2.0 :0 1.5 , .............. , .... , ... , 2.0 ., 0.75 ' 1.5 . ..... ·--1,.5· 244.2 Hours 0.5 .0:25 0.25 r ·;,r:,-'·:·-1.cr •:•'t'""" ., ""I''• '" . -· ' -----·~ 3.0 1.0 0.75 o:s· 0.5 0.25 l.25 1.0 1.0 · LO'. 1.5 ... 1.5 .. 0.25 ·····.··· 05 . 0.5 }0,?) l.O , ·, . L5 0.25 · 0.2~ 1.0 :·.:.?} .. Page 8 of9 Amount $132.00 s;i)2.oo $138.00 i.41:i:oo. $276.00 · s;,IJ:foo $276.00 $276,.i>o $276.00 $1}_8:00 $207.00 ·. J,iifoo $276.00 $10'3:50 $207.00 ....... $2()f()() $32,712.00 Amount $0.00 · $33:oo $33.00 $1).2.00 $396.00 ······ :· $i:i2,6o $99.00 .... $§6.0o $132.00 ··.· .. $33.0ci $66.00 ·j;:iioo' $0.00 )9.od $0.00 _ $3ioo: $198.00 .· $128,00 $33.00 . $66.00, $66.00 . ($66.00) $132.00 .... ·~19(00 $33.00 _ $3ioo: $132.00 ----··· ~3.30 .. 0ff .soc Page 9 of9 Task/Description Name Org Workday Hours Amount Conference Casey, Laura 3470 10/07/2002 1.0 $132.00 Field Check . Caseyi L~ur<i 3.4?.0. I 9912412QO I . 1.5 . $198.0_Q Field Check Gillen, Nick 3470 03/07/2003 3.0 $414.00 c9ns~f11tti9,n;. i I 1.,-1·;·· .... :H·,:·:·,-;-i !," ,. : I,. ';3470. Jo7ifi~ifo 1 '• I 0.75 .f$99,00 .. : ' C~s~y, l,~l\rE • ,,Iii. • 1 l~ .,I,:· ....... ,, 0 :, N-hh, Consultation Casey, Laura 3470 11/06/2001 0.25 $33.00 Subtotal SA 30.25 $3,417.00 Function TD -Threshold Determination Task/Description Se.pa R.equiremenis'fleview Subtotal TD Function TR -Traffic Review Task/Description Traffic Review i'rami: R.eyi•"' Traffic Review Traffic Revje,y_ Traffic Review Traffi~·Review Name . Hudson, Richard ,- Name o.rg Workday 3464 --12/1812002 Hours 0.5 0.5 Amount . $66.00 $66.00 Org Workday Hours Amount Langley, Kristen 3464 01/29/2002 1.0 $132.00 .•.. •L(iiigley/!<iisie~ijT': · :J.4?4.,. ':q~7(~17oor , .. , J.6~.oQ. Langley, Kristen 3464 10/07/2002 1.0 $132.00 l,.apgiey:I<fisten~ . 3464 (QiQlihopf: 1.5 $198.00 Langley, Kristen 3464 02/05/2003 1.0 $138.00 ·· ·-r:~~g1iy,I<iisten 3464. 0211312oil3 .. · _Io · · -$138.oo Traffic Review Langley, Kristen 3464 06/30/2003 2.5 $345.00 ... Hearings/Lega(p;9~~is :: r :: .:. '.:.Liwgley; Krist~~ :: 'J.A6t 067i5/~003 . .. . . . . . .. . . 1.0 $f38.0Q Hearings Langley, Kristen 3464 06/30/2003 2.5 $345.00 . FieldCh~ck " ,.:··· · :/.;a11gle§;~r(stirii,j!: :,::::F~if iiihotioi:if/ ]'.o. $1):i;go Field Check Langley, Kristen 3464 02/28/2003 2.0 $276.00 Public Coritac\t · · Meetings .. Meetings Meetings ' 1 ., 1,,;;;i1~:;;.x;;,,i.~ •· 3464 : 071dsifqof:_ ........ :. :o.s $66.90: Report Prepanttion . Subtotal TR Function WL -Wetland Review Task/Description Permit/ Plan Review .. Pe~ii /;Pia!) Review 'T : Hearings. Hearings Conference Subtotal WL TOTAL: Langley, Kristen 3464 01/30/2002 1.0 $132.00 . '(llllgfoy){risten"_' :· 3464. _os102hoo2_ . 1.0 $132,00 Langley, Kristen 3464 10/07/2002 1.25 $165.00 -Langley, Kristen · 3464 .. 02/0612003· . i.o $138.oo Name Org Workday Casey, Laura 3470 02/13/2003 .. ·:··c~s~y':L,ura ., .... ?',·'.3 .. ··.4.··_,'fo_·.··.··.·,, ·.·.o.··.2.iBi.2. 6 .. o ... :i .. '.' . . :c. .... ·'· .. ,, •. Casey,_L.aura . 34.79 .... 03/06/2003 <;:_a!ey, l,.~ur.'1 3479 Q3/10/i()_o3 __ . Casey, Laura 34 70 02/18/2003 19.75 Hours 0.75 .i_JJ,5 . 0.75 1.0 0.75 3.75 422.45 $2,673.00 Amount $103.50 ')69.0Q $103.50 $J38.0Q $103.50 $517.50 $56,080.95 The hours shown above represent the actual hours of service charged on this to date. Hours worked that are covered by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly ch,1r11,1s not covered by a base fee are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid i'! full before DDES issues Final .Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. -.~ CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: November 5, 2009 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M. Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: EVENDELL r;,,_,_,\ ('\,d· LUA (file) Number: LUA-09-113 t:cr/PP Cross-References: } AKA's: KC file# L01P0016 Project Manager: Acceptance Date: 09/20/01 Applicant: US Land Development Owner: US Land Development Contact: Mike Romano/Centurion Developmen·t PID Number: 1423059022 ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: March 28, 2003 Appeal Period Ends: April 11, 2003 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: 3/28/2003 Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: 20050726000751 Project Description: Subdivision of 12.43 acres into 70 single-family residential lots in the R-4 zone. Recorded at King County. Location: Between 156th Ave SE and 160 Ave SE , south SE 136'" Street Comments: \~ .,;,-. TYPES 3 and 4 LOG SHEET (Forll\at ~-lat, Rezone, Special Use, Shoreline Redesignation) FILE NUMBER: L01P0016 / LOiTY401 HEARING DA TE(S): 8~ ~ ,3 PLAT/PROJECT NAME: EVENDELL CONTINUANCE HEARING DATE(S) ____ _ PLANNER: Karen Scharer PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO.: :II' el!):23-M:31 /,)UTT ENGINEER: Bruce Whittaker RELATED APPLICATION & FILE NO. APPLICATION FILED (date): 07/06/2001 -#-.,;lM3-~3.,.<. ~ EXAMINER DECISION/REC: --------- . COMPLETE APPLICATION (date): ~ /,;o/o /· APPEAL FILED: D NO Jl-YES date: ____ _ ])f:.N~ ~e--z.o~e., ~L I L/~<=i4·( , \2-ewNE., 1)~_lE:1) .0(20/03 A. COUNCIL ACTIONS. ?1,1;,.T\\\l~Cll[>~~l'J'~~ .\4{o~S EFFECTIVE DATE: (Q /3C) / 0 2) HEARING DATE(S) ~ \ OD l ~:=i;--: (+NJ. ~h l\ll~ M [ ~::'\ , f I I. 1ti NOTICE OF APPEAL ) 2. '!JI APPEAL ARGUMENTS I '\. \=\LE. . B. HEARINGEXAMINER'SACTIONS-~/o'f O't (.o\F'DO\\..Q~ y'>.QQ~.~,t<J~D-~~ED~"& date(s): ,fl.k AJ 3 ,;J h, IZJ 3 I. ¢ PREHEARING CONF. NOTICE 'ti( HEARING NOTICE 2. 3 D PREHEARING ORDER 4 D CONTINUATION 5. ~ REPORT!~ QcunCJL 6 D RECONSIDERATION 7. fjl.. APPEAL SUMMARY ~ DOES STAFF ACTIONS date(s): IJ-/l"l /(j3 date(s): ----- date(s): --,----,~- date(s): 3 / J.'9 / 0 3 date(s): --,--~- date(s): (,, /o~ I <::i,3 I 1. D CONTINUATION NOTICE date mailed: ---,~--,~ 2. i(gPORT date mailed: B-~,3 3. ~DDENDUM REPORT date mailed: ' 4. ~RANSMITT AL TO EXAMINER (POR's/DOCS/STUDIES) date sent: ;/34/LJ3mx/ai-/.l-tJ.J Ji~ 5. ~OPOSED ORDINANCE NUMBER EMAIL TO THE KC CLERKS OFFICE date sent:/• .&;?--0 3 D 6. /JLltAJ/llfll!, #M/ll/U6 /11.f lr'L) n> -f.Kl'f/?J/Pc/f-.. h?fcLJ 1-..21-i:1 3 V SEPA REQUIREMENTS OHRESHOLD DETERMINATION: /)1 J}/1) s . DATE ISSUED: / c? 43 # .:2.. 2. SEA TILE TIMES PUBLICATION DATE: DATE AFFIDAVIT REC'D: __ _ 3. DATE POSTED PER AFFIDAVIT: --------~ DATE AFFIDAVIT REC'D: 6) DATE 500' RADIUS/AGENCIES/PORS/STAFF SENT: -~/.«¢::,,,~~-=~3.._._ac.....,,°O"--"a-....,"'-",,__-------- 5_ APPEAL FILED: DYES D NC:f ·, a. APPELLANTS: -------------- b. APPEAL ARGUMENTS: ----------- date received: -------- date received: -------- date received: -------- date received: -------- date received: -------- date received: -------- ,. ~ ~· ' ,.,... ,j , ' ' -TYPES 3 AND 4 LOG SHEET (rev . ./J81600) ' page 2 of3 E. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENT I. NOTICE OF APPLICATION a) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING/POSTING PACKAGE SENT z/;zd!it/ REC'D /d • -1-'-t:1 / b) LEGAL AD SEATTLE 11MES date(s) sent: ':e/.:i l&I date published: IP-'f-0 / LOCALS date(s) sent: 9p ~ A.J/ date published: /{)-q-0/ c) 500' RADIUS/AGENCIES/POR's/STAFF date(s) sent: /0 :£:-(2 / 2. NOTICE OF RECOMMENDATION/PUBLIC HEARING a) LEGAL AD SEA TILE TIMES date(s) sent: /-3/--LJ 3 date published: ,;l-k~C/3 LOCALS date(s) sent:/-3/-.?J..3 date published: .fl.-.d-()3 b) 500' RADIUS/AGENCIES/POR's/STAFF date sent: /--3,l-(2 3 ' F. APPLICATJON Date received: 716 lo I 1. ri INTAKE CHECKLIST 0 APPLICATION FEE ·) d APPLICANT DESIGNATION FORM (2 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. ri LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( 'flf t-]~ /of) r£ ASSESSOR'S MAPS: .riw 9 HPI ss ( red 7-/0-0 / } r,n CERTIFICATE OF WATER AV A!LABILITY -ff: ll{--2.3-';) ~t lf-23--S) N vv /l( 23-SJ -SW l~-23-S Ji CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY 8. 0 PRELIMINARY HEAL TH APPROVAL 9. 0 CERTIFICATE OF FUTURE CONNECTION 10. d FIRE DISTRICT RECEIPT 11. J SITE PLAN/PLAT MAP (o Id i ne.v) 12. rzl LEGAL LOT PROOF 13. J SENSITIVE AREA AFFIDAVIT 14. J ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I~/) !SE/) t-c79-t!J;;2_, lt1-/Lf-(,lol-..._ 15. r/, TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY (Z) ~'II~ 3/~(02- /J ,'111 e:ns/on Cc, /c11 (i,-011.J (~-£ i--J..-~) 16. 0 LEVEL ONE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS 17. d OTHER P/qf ~ns i])( qn,A G+-J; r/;_~f- 18. di WAIVER(Sl from P ~I:? Ginf'uto ce G. ADDITIONAL PLANS/MAPS 1. CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN 2. WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN (J2 REVISION NO. 1 &REVISION NO. 2 0/REVISION NO. 3 6. REVISION NO. 4 7. OTHER MAPS a) Joeojtanhf; ]-k-01 DA TES RECEIVED: 9:-t~z .3-a?Ci-~d< ,r d/7-t:J 2 e), ________________ _ f) _______________ _ ?LJur~/UJ/JtCJ,At.. ~ ~~ t!Pr~Wln ?LJ!.a, /J~~/'C,)$4(.. r ,• -·TYrES 3 AND 4 LOG SHEET (rev. 081600) page 3 of3 H. SPECIAL STUDIES ' 1. WETLAND/STREAM REPORT 3. 4. 5. DA TES RECEIVED 7/1,(01 6. 6 ~.D. 1. L -r; . 8. 9.4, h?I 12w dF 611a L~zr,,z:;:x_ fl2M1 er:"'A/7l(/t./;;A) l)e:t/, 9. t? -tf. -LJ I ,5-rrtrL<Yti112-Y ld/l-4:#t'W7Y {}f.?() 10. "!--~--at 5w:z,n12v Wct.e&wTY 4EF72 EtZIJ/11': 7&1to~rt21iz"C. IL f.-& :::4 I ,5mTL/7ZJ,£,'T J,)d/V2,,6A)l7 t)eEYJ Ee'Li/lt 7iW1,l~/,9-774AJ 7/rL.Er :~: $:~j; 9%~¢;:;1&1w1/!/rYH ReA!M/v' 14. f--,2/-/) I ' Nn7t!.t? 4F aM&Jlc $/JLJM7T(MJ 15. f-,M,7'2/ A?a1m.sz::::en /1/.)/.J/T/.l,N'#L ~F,:?,eHJl"171tJ/I.) 16. IJ-eZ-41 t&Lt£rr: 82? /J1tJ4,£ @1»77tPAMl 7;,tJl)},;(i!VfT.&e} ,1 · /o-~al Lim&? /LJi2-,b.;,xufJT ~111 6. 4/4-l't 18. /1-/-,::)/ £11,tt-iL E@)/11 BM 4, 1 //E?AA . ID?tf, ~ ::,iz::n-9~~~~~ 22. 1:l-,l/.-LJI tE:lTfL l1) J1. t:411 wv /'l./)111 X. ~ 23. e<cl£-4e? /~au 04121 m.tfwl't:Nt2 i'z&1tfsm16 <-&~ii ~.ll... 24. ;1.z,.4,;z !.trrtn E>ilfM: )(. SmtJL,e;e. ~ J11,fb;"',N</dcz1!&4f~7;k~~ 25. 3-tt?t. -tX}, Mfl>&Wt-114< ) ,<2.1!!,(£ ·411:e/J(J.f}L. lfl 1C7h h2L)ft,L M-AIMAW 26. {-tl£-d2 /JUlhfJ F&JIY' ,6Aeg'l$aaJ71fll~w .ll: 7.ettrAc> ,;Jn,J,io,9/~~ 21. 3 .;;1, z>e? 6P v ?JF swm ///Vz.1/'kU<!.P t'&l<I: > Tarf2 ..2-.:z c-tJ~ 28. .J...?& ::z2o? ~PV ~E 5rn,t.r[7J;2.Y WA/Ull/NZY !k-e.LJ 29 . .3-,;11..-tJ,P, SuJn;nt3:£Y (J£ i)~WN7Z(2.Bl/v' t?tmtAlfloE &m PIA;/AJTS 3o. ,3:.,u72g Rf.tll.$00 /?UTT /J.e;t1$17Y c'Ate::S: Fotz. £ r'AL11--1viJA1-/u,£, 31 .3-o?~ -,:22 Retfl.SE/2 furr f}.q..rJirY t!A1L!.5> £& ?lo e121JtDU'- 32. ~£0<6 l.eni::12 L,J~/J?.ut/B t;'£AtnCm2&rs·AIL//W(!,p PoJ.l-.A ~:: t:;:1 5~~~;;:!%1::/!~~,7):a;;1!!1~~ 35. £--x'--tl2 t'!Pmtt1&1rc1£10tL--PMM 6.Mi,u Tt? /!Aa?<l?IF'tu;,v> , f ~I --· I · lfile No. L01P0016 / L01TY401 Additional Correspondence ( I. ) ,,;. .. 36. 6 &~ ~ CmmcAJTLLFt:e E~tti 6, 1/1¢ TZJ /11-dtA1tVV'~ 37. 't/;e~,;.. L£7T& ~ 6,k n> 6.#!&t:1#1-/&«iNJ&e.. . 38. tfPii>k,;z. !fM/£$7 @£.. All/Jdl/lM1-LU1'ilzAtHZ7dA./ 39. 103~,2 a!Tf.lL ~ /J1-~~ 121.: >m.ttJ(AVtl<2Pdt:J.4iZ~?/ 40. Vo79 b /.) /)t)/J d/ enli.L--5/ed 4/l&t (b.Jw£t"tw Ve-v L . • 41. ib9/J.;i_ &r dEd,7tlg~M lf~t12.r/t!A-1/l._, 7°C) /11-IJltl/ldt:2 . J ) . _./J/J.47Z• . /J /. /) ;.,,, 42 . .!f<l.1/~;:? J/urM-mlflTIJA.J c~;ua~IL-&aM ./ll-/wnM.J/J/~'d!Rto,.J • 43 ff ~1/2U,. 'i7lfR (<)/ ~ hfMt £.A/J~<,1/,t,,/£,m ;,_ "J.Y,l)AiU , J 44. /ohA,-2.. !Ttl?--: w 6./~a,i r~ K~j~ 45. 14 I 't' /t;,2 /1/J1J17ZtJl{/,,,1{_ J;;/'441M-17~2 fusTJNI! -~&u?J ' 46. fl) Jr~ ,;z. hv1~ t1 R!J_ fr-je L3'. 47. 14h1>/thz E;n.,11L E4J/11 6. h/4# ZZ2 L_ ~A'~ 48. /~/2$-/o.Z ,U11/11L 7ZJ ,Kf~ RZdM f-e/UAJY@~f?i/:to 49. 114',,.dJ,2-/ttVJ177t»iJt7l ~1~/JAJ ~MST ~#1-/d;,-nANt:1 5o. 1b.?-ft3 It.mg Eitt!M d-rtu~m,Jd(2.J11.,,,~N /.J77J J,,.;);3 I 51. /J(.2/tltA 1/tJM --/i0&£. /J~&t,1L£ dr fl/~;u &mr&t-?{}~ 52. 1.tJA1d?ai,. LJAY'1E Ml&it--/t!!J!II f/4/dfhmty 72J //1-/4.,11{~.' -~IL a~~ riA!J(J/---, 53. ;,a/o;A,BJ, /tl)IJ~M '12J J.A.77_MJ4 8/;4il.l/}7mAJd/Jt/l,<Jb9l?mtJAr'/.a /) . ~ ~ . -'ff£//~ .,,;l,f,,::Y ~ 54. J.JiJ(,l),{)S7/2HUt LLAl/k~ 55. h?/dco2 Atw~Al,d(Utt -rLJ /£.11:L--Li /JMINff!c ~t?Y 56. @&'~ 3 A-7/77.hll 7o.JNzz.e.Vw6 57. ____________________ _ 58. ____________________ _ 59. ____________________ _ 60. ____________________ _ 61. ____________________ _ 62. ____________________ _ 63. ____________________ _ 'I i----· ® _) Departmenl of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division Notice of Decision 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 File No.: Project Name: ODES Planner: Telephone No.: Applicant: Project Location: Project Description: Permits Requested: L01P00I6 & L01TY401 Evendell Subdivision and Rezone Karen Scharer, Program/Project Manager II 206-296-7114 Howard Stansbury U.S. Land Development Associates c/o Michael J. Romano, Centurian Development Services 22617 -81 • Drive SE Bothell, WA 98021 425-486-2563 Lying south of SE 136'" Street and between 156 1 • Ave SE and 160'" Ave SE. Proposed is a rezone of 13 acres from R-4 to R-6 and to subdivide the site into 70 lots for detached single-family residences. Should the rezone not be granted, the applicant has proposed an alternative of subdividing the east 11.46 acres under R-4 zoning into 46 lots for detached single-family residential use. Rezone and Formal plat SEPA Threshold Determination: Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) Comment/Appeal Procedure: Comments on this SEP A determination are welcome. This SEP A dete1mination may also be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. A notice of appeal must be filed with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on January 16, 2003, and be accompanied with a filing fee of$250.00 payable to the King County Office of Finance. lf a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall also file a Statement of Appeal with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on January 16, 2003. The Statement of Appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including the file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. Further, the Statement of Appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) at the following address: DDES--Land Use Services Division Attn: Permit Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Date Mailed: December 23, 2002 If you have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the Land Use Services Division at 206-296-6600. If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, call 206-296-6600 (voice) or 206-296-7217 (TTY). n6\apra\Notice of oechion SEPA TD.doc clc 7/27/99 -;..I .. : ............... ~ .. , ... ,~ ...... ~ . .,,_ ,. ......... --.......... . ......... ,., ... ti.1111111· j 111 '111 11· " . I'' I • l !. I . I l'U'ljPl II I 1111 I I 0 I 11 I ! l 1 1!H!1 1'l'f If i' I I ' ' .· i ·. ~ ' ;, . d· ~= •• r . ' i I . i . !1•111111 i1·l1I I·· ·1 .. r . II I ~--~.~~ lil'll!il···· 'i 1!11111111 • ..... I " • ~ ti • ~ 'I • .. ',.-_I• u ., . 11111 11111 Ill 1111 It'll I I 'I I t!iH f !Iii' I( I I • '·-1~--~-i ff I i _ r I - :, _ .. "I ' l igr_rl'r f . . . . . t 1 j • • ;:: ;:: l:t ' ' I a --·1 -I' ! s B ~ e . ::i .., .., ! B . .. • :-1 ::i ::i . . . . ...... _.__,, _______ _ --- • -! ! i • ~ . i 156th ven'ue Southeut \ ///~ ,,.,· ! <,'. . . ' • ·'. ---: / _.,, . ------"·--- "'" -------·-·-- I I ·--·---"-·--- .. ___ - 4 CREEKS UAC ATTN: CLAUDIA DONNELLY PO BOX 3501 RENTON, WA 98056 BRYANT, RONDA 15406 SE 136TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 CARLSON, MARILYN 13616 156TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 CITY OF RENTON ATTN: REBECCA LIND I 055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 CLAUSSEN.KIM SR. PLAT l'LAN'.'JER ODES/ CPLN MS: OAK -DE-0100 COFFIN, RONALD 16015 SE 135TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059-6828 DAY, SHIRLEY 14412 167TH PLACE SE RENTON, WA 98059 DORST AD, ROGER EVERGREEN EAST REALTY PO BOX 375 REDMOND, WA 98073 GILLEN. NICK WETLAND REVIEW DDES / SDSS MS: OAK· DE -0100 LO\P00\6 LOIP00\6 LOIP00\6 LOIP00\6 L01P0016 L01P0016 LOIP00\6 LO!P00\6 LOlPOOl6 HANSON, STEPHEN & YVONNE 1561 l SE l38TII PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 HARBOUR HOMES KURT WILSON 1010 S. 336TH ST., SUITE #305 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 HEMNES, VALERIE 15627 SE 139TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98058 HIGH, VICTOR & GWENDOLYN 13405 158TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 HILL, EDWARD, JUNE & KRISTY 13527 -156TH A VENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 HILTON, EDWARD & NANCY 13414-158TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 HUGHES, KURT 15646 SE 138TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 JAQUES, FRED AND HELGA \31\4158Tl\AVENUESE RENTON, WA 98059 JO\INSTON. LEONARD J 16016 SE \35Tll RENTON, WA 98059 LOIP00\6 LO\P00\6 LO\P00\6 LO\P00\6 L01P00!6 LOJP0016 LOIPD016 LOIP0016 LO\P0016 KC EXECUTIVE HORSE COUNCIL ELEANOR MOON 12230 NE 61ST KIRKLAND, WA 98033 KEZELE, DON 15657 SE 137TH PLACE RENTON WA 98059 LANGLEY. KRISTEN LAND USE TRAFFIC ODES/ CPLN MS: OAK -DE-0100 LEE.JOANN 13802 !60THAVENUESE RENTON, WA 98059 LEX, TIM & GINA 131!6158TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 LYMAN, STEVE 14505 • 160TH A VENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 MARCY, JERRY POST OFFICE 130X 575 SEATTLE, WA 981 l 1 MARTIN, FRED & GLORIA 13019160THAVESE RENTON, WA 98059 MOKIN,BILL 14404 162ND AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 LOIPOOl6 LOJP0016 LOIP00\6 LOIPOOl6 LOIP0016 LOIP0016 LOIP0016 LOIP0016 LOIPOOl6 MUHICH, STEVEN & PERI 13420 160TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 NIPERT, SALLY !4004 !56THAVESE RENTON, WA 98059 NOTT, FLORENCE l 5915 SE 134TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 OLIPHANT, RICHARD & ANITA 16519 SE 145TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 PETRIE, DA VE 811 SOUTH 273RD COURT DES MOINES, WA 98198 PLATT, DAVID 510 PANORAMIC DRIVE CAMANO ISLAND, WA 98282 ROGERS, CAROL CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DOES/ CPLN MS: OAK-DE-0100 ROLLINGER, MARSHA 15646 SE 138TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 SCHARER, KAREN PROJECT PLANNER MS: OAK -DE-0100 DDES/CPLN LOJP0016 LOIPOOl6 L01P00l6 LOIP0016 LOIP00\6 LOIP0016 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOl6 LOIP0016 SCHOLES, GENEVA !'2924 158TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 SCHUSTER, CURTIS G JOHN L SCOTT REAL ESTATE 12505 BEL-RED RD, STE 212 BELLEVUE WA 98005 SCOBY, CHARLES & VIOLA 13112158THAVESE RENTON, WA 98059-8531 SIDEBOTHAM, KAREN & JEFFREY . 13004 158TH A VE SE RENTON. WA 98059 SLATON, DANIEL fl l 5315 SE 133RD COURT RENTON, WA 98059 STREIT, PEGGY 13512 160TH AVENUE SE RENTON. WA 98059 THORBECK, PENNY 15650 SE I 38TI I PL RENTON, WA 98059 WA ST.ECOLOGY DEPT /WQSW UNIT ATTN: LINDA MATLOCK PO BOX 47696 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7696 WATLER, DAVID ! 5ri35 SE ! 38TI ! PL. RENTON, WA 98059 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOl6 LOIP0016 LOIP0016 LO!POOl6 LOIPOOl6 LOIP0016 LOIP0016 L01P00!6 WEST, LARRY GEO REVIEW DDES/SDSS MS: OAK· DE-0100 WHITTAKER, BRUCE PRELIMINARY REVIEW ENGINEER DOES/ ERS MS: OAK -DE-0100 WILMOT, MR. & MRS. 13900 160TH A VENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 WOLBERG, ALVIN 16021 SE 136TH STREET RENTON, WA 98059 ZEEK, HAROLD & ELEANOR !6621 SE 145TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOl6 L01P00!6 LOIPOOl6 LOlP00\6 --...... (E Renton) FD25 (Spring Glen) FD40 Fire Protection Dist #25 Fire Protection Dist #40 P.O. Box 2925 10828 SE 176th St Renton WA 98056-0925 Renton WA 98055 MS: KSC-NR-0600 MS: KSC-TR-0431 KC27 Water & Land Res. Div Gary Kriedt King County Dept. of Natural Res. KC Metro Envirn. Planning Steve Foley Lll5 LI20 Fairwood Library Highlands Library 17009 -140th Av SE 2902 NE 12th St Renton WA 98058 Renton WA 98056 LI23 Documents Dept. Librarian LI24 Kent Regional Library King County Library System 2 12 --2nd Av N 960 Newport Way NW Kent WA 98032-4482 Issaquah, WA 98027 LI36 ATTN: Edward White PL18 Renton Library Kent Engineering Dept 100 Mill Av S 220-4th Av S Renton WA 98055 Kent WA 98032 PL19 City of Renton PL33 Kent Planning Dept Economic Development Dept. 220 -4th Av S 1055 S. Grady Way Kent WA 98032 Renton WA 98055 Clinton G. Marsh, Director Fae. & Const. Dept SD9 R. Stracke, Facilities & Plng SD13 Kent School District # 415 Renton School Dist # 403 12033 SE 256th St. Bldg B 1220 N 4th St Kent WA 98031-6643 Renton WA 98055 Administrator SES Environmental Review Section ST2 Kent Sewer Utility · WA State Dept of Ecology 220 -4th Av S PO Box 47703 Kent WA 98032 Olympia WA 98504-7703 Habitat Biologist, Rod Malcom TRI Russ Ladley, Fisheries Biologist TR2 M uckleshoot Indian Tribe Puyallup Tribe 39015 -172nd Av SE 6824 Pioneer Wy E Auburn WA 98002 Puyallup WA 98371 TR3 Fisheries Habitat/Environment TRS Snoqualmie Tribe Suquamish Indian Tribe PO Box 280 PO Box 498 Carnation WA 98014-0280 Suquamish WA 98392 I l Richard Young TR4 WD12 Tulalip Tribe Cedar River Water/Sewer Dist 7615 Totem Beach Rd 18300 SE Lk Youngs Rd M~rysville WA 98271 Renton WA 8058-9799 Public Works Dtr WD23 City of Renton, Public Works Dept. WD32 Kent Water Dist Development Services Div. 220-4thAvS l 055 South Grady Way Kent WA 98032 Renton WA 98055 WD41 WD55 Soos Creek Water/Sewer Dist Water Dist #90 PO Box 58039 15606 SE !28th St Renton WA 98058-1039 Renton WA 98059-8522 WD57 WD58 Coal Creek Utility District Water Dist #111 680 I 132nd Place SE 27224 -144th Av SE Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent WA 98042-9058 WA State Dept. of Wildlife WA State Dept. of Wildlife 16018 Mill Creek Blvd. Habitat Mgmt. Division Mill Creek, WA 98012 P.O. Box 43155 Olympia, WA 98504-3155 WA State Dept. of Ecology WA St.DOT MS 230 NW Regional Office 15700 Dayton Ave. No 3190 -160th Ave SE PO Box 330310 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 WA St DOT MS 240 WA St.DOT MS 250 15700 Dayton Ave No. 15700 Dayton Ave. No. PO Box 330310 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 WA St. Ecology Dept/WQSW Unit Roger Dorstad Linda Matlock PO Box 375 PO Box 47696 Redmond, WA 98073 Olympia, WA 98504-7696 Eleanor Moon KC Executive Horse Council 12230 NE 61st Kirkland, WA 98033 -· 3664500278/LOIPOOl6 BECKMAN FRANCIS J JR BECKMAN ROBIN J 13S.1 I 158TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 1457500096/LOIP0016 BOWDEN EDWARD & SHARON I 3939 SE 10TH PL RENTON WA 98058 1423059006/LOIP0016 BRYANT FRANKLYN A & RONDA A 15406 SE 136TH RENTON WA 98059 1423059019/LOIP0016 CARLSON MARILYNN E 13616156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000190/LOIPOOl6 COFFIN RONALD E 16015 SE 135TH RENTON WA 98055 1463400055/LOIP0016 DONNELLY KEITH E+SHIRLEY C 13805156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 1423059087/LOIPOOI6 FRANK JOSEPH J 15628 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98059 741S000050/LOIP0016 HALLETT GARY+MAUREEN M 15634 SE 138TH PLACE RENTON WA 98059 7418000150/LOIPOOl6 HANSON STEPHEN M+YVONNE M 15611 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1423059059/LOIP0016 HILL EDWARD J JR 13527 156TH SE RENTON WA 98055 14.,"69044/LOIP00\6 BELL HAROLD E 15636 SE 139TH PLACE RENTON WA 98055 1457500090/LOIP00\6 BOWEN VIRGIL E 13644 160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98056 1423059104/LOIP0016 BRYANT LARRY E 1567 I SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98055 PL50/LO I POO 16 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 1423059047/LOIP0016 COLONY HOMES INC 1215120THAVENE#201 BELLEVUE WA 98005 1423059033/LOIP0016 EHLERT DONALD E+EILEEN F 15502 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98056 1423059067/LOIP0016 GOETLICHER MARK S+SUSAN E 15623 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 !463400045/LOIP0016 HALLIN VALERIE L 15415 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98056 1463400051/LOIP0016 HENRY ALEXANDER M TTEE 13727 156TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 7418000090/LOIPOOl6 HILLJAY PO BOX 507 RENTON WA 98057 2c __ J00300/LOIPOOI6 BONFIGLIO THOMAS L+TERESA L 5253 NE 184TH ST LAKE FOREST PARK WA 98155 7418000040/LOI POO 16 BREIMON GENE 20530 SE I 30TH ST ISSAQUAH WA 98027 2006000270/LOIP0016 BURKS JAMES W 16038 SE 136TH RENTON WA 98055 PL33/LO I POO 16 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 2006000140/LOIP0016 DA VIES ROBERT A & LORI 14708 30TH NE SEATTLE WA 98126 UAC-FC/LOIP0016 FOUR CREEKS UNINCORPORATED AREA COUNCIL 12819 160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 1423059012/LOIP0016 HAGERMAN EDWARD G 13710 156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 1463400049/LOIP0016 HALLUM JOHN MARTIN+VALERIE 15415 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98056 1463400050/LOIPOOl6 -HENRY WILLIAM J TRUSTEE HENRY FAMILY LIVING TRUST 13707156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500135/LOIP00\6 HILTON EDWARD W+NANCY J 13414 158TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 9425:200040/LOIP0016 HOPSON VALERIE K 15627 SE 139TH PL REINTON WA 98059 9425200059/LOIPOOl6 JACOBS JEFFREY A+CHARMAINE 15643 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98059 3664500133/LOIPOOl6 JOHNSON WILLIAM 15902 SE 134TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1423059102/LOIP00!6 KEZELE DJ 15657 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98055 1423059074/LOIPOOl6 KEZELE DONALD J 15657 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98055 1423059053/LOIP0016 KNEBEL PAUL J+ MICHELLE 13730 156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 1457500095/LOIP0016 LEE STEVEN P 13802160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 1463400046/LOIP0016 MCADAMS CLAYTON A JR 15454 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98055 7418000030/LOIPOOl6 MCASKILL DENNIS 15618 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 9425200050/LOIPOOl6 MICHALSKI DAVID CHARLES 15635 SE 139TH ST RENTON WA 98055 7,. ,J0070/LO I POO 16 HUGHES KURT !+CHRISTINE R 15646 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 3664500126/LOIP0016 JOHNSON GLENDA E 13425 160TH A VENUE SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000150/LOIPOOl6 JOHNSTON LEONARD J 160!6SE 135TH RENTON WA 98059 1423059042/LOIPOOl6 KEZELE DON+DIANE 15657 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 2006000020/LOIP00!6 KNAPP RICHARD A 13412 160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 1423059054/LOIPOOl6 KNEBEL PAUL JOHN+SANDRA GAi 5310185THAVECTE SUMNER WA 98390 2006000200/LOIPOOl6 MAGGARD DONALDS 16023 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 1463400048/LO!P0016 MCADAMS MARY MARTIN 15454 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1457500087/LOIP0016 MCDONALD KIMBERLY ANNE 6947 COAL CREEK PKWY SE PMB354 NEWCASTLE WA 98059 741800002DILOIPOOl6 MIDDLETON LARRY D 15614 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98055 I,. ,59090/LOIPOOl6 HUNIU LEO 15642 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98055 2006000260/LOIP0016 JOHNSON JOHNNIE M 16046 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98055 1423059086/LOIP0016 KELLY BYRON D+PAULA M 15620SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98059 !423059051/LOIPOOl6 KEZELE DONALD J 15657 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1423059089/LOIP0016 KNEBEL PAUL J 5310185THAVECTE SUMNER WA 98390 7418000110/LO!P00!6 KOHR STEPHEN M+SHELLY R 15641 SE 18TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1423059022/LOIPOOl6 MAIR ROBERT 13606 156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98056 7418000130/LOIP00!6 MCARTHUR JAN !+LAURA A 15627 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1457500100/LOIP0016 MCNAIR DANNY M PO BOX 18914 SEATTLE WA 98118 . 74!8000140/LOIP00!6 MIHET BENJAMIN+ESTERA F 15621 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1423059045/LOIP0016 MILBRATH DON D 15624 SE 137TH PL REl>JTON WA 98059 3664500285/LOIPOOl6 MILL CHARLES V+ CATHERINEM 13434 156TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 7418000100/LOIP0016 MULLINS CECIL K 18631 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2006000280/LOIPOOl6 NASS LEROY 15713 SE 128TH RENTON WA 98056 2006000160/LOIP0016 NORRIS JOHN B+ROSA M 10516 172ND CT SE RENTON WA 98059 1423059009/LOIPOOl6 NYBLOM DAVID A+DEBRA L ALBI 13606 158TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500280/LOIP0016 OSGOODBY ELEANOR & VICTOR OSGOODBY BRUCE 13436 156TH SE RENTON WA 98056 9425200080/LOIP0016 PAULSEN ROGER A 15657 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98055 1457500085/LOIPOOl6 PLATT DA VID+GEORGIA 510 E PANORAMIC DR CAMANO ISLAND WA 98292 1423059101/LOI P0016 POAGUE JOHN+GEORGIA 15111 SE 43RD ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 I, ,59112/LOIP00!6 MILBRATH DON D 15624 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 2006000220/LOIPOOl6 MOELLER STEVEN R I 0836 CRESTWOOD DR S SEATTLE WA 98178 9425200070/LOIP0016 MURAYAMA PEGGY 15649 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98056 2006000210/LOIP0016 NASS LEROY 15713 SE 128TH RENTON WA 98056 3664500127/LOIP0016 NOTT DALEH 13422158TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500270/LOIP0016 OSGOODBY ALAN G 13527158THAVESE RENTON WA 98059 3664500279/LOIP0016 OSGOOD BY JR BRUCE S 13523 158TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500260/LOIP0016 PERRY LUCILLE M 13426 156TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98056 2006000180/LOIP0016 PLATZ ERIN D 14627 160TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 SDl3/LOIP0016 R. STRACKE, FACILITIES & PLANNING RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT #403 1220N 4TH ST RENTON WA 98055 I,. J59043/LOIPOOl6 MILBRATH DON D 15624 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98055 2006000010/LOIPOOl6 MUHICH STEVEN C+PERI A 13420 160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 9425200060/LOIPOOl6 MURAY AMA PEGGY H 15649 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1423059058/LOIP0016 NICHOLS MARKE & BARBARA A 13815 160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500120/LOIPOOl6 NOTT FLORENCE 15915 SE 134TH PL RENTON WA 98059 3664500281/LOI POOl6 OSGOODBY BRUCE SHANNON 13456 156TH SE RENTON WA 98055 1457500086/LOIP0016 PAPPAS LONNIE S 16009 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 3664500261/LOI POOi 6 PERRY LUCILLE M 13426 156 AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 3664500141/LOIPOOl6 PLATZ GUYE ET AL 13535 160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000130/LOIPOOl6 ROBERTSON GORDON R+SULTANA 16032 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 1457500097/LOJPOOJ6 ROHRER JJM+SHEILA 21914 N ACULPCO DR SUN CITY WEST AZ 85375 SD8/LOJ P0016 STEVE CRAWFORD, NEW CONSTRUCTION ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT #411 565 NW HOLLY ST ISSAQUAH WA 98027 7418000080/LOIP0016 TH ORBECK DA VE 15650 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1423059027/LOIP0016 WILLOUGHBY WADE V+NANCY 15612 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1457500088/LOIPOOJ6 WOLBERG ALVIN & DIANE 16021 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 7, .• J00010/LOJPOOJ6 SPENCER DA YID LEE 13806 156TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000170/LOIP0016 STREIT PEGGY ANN 13512160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 7418000060/LOIP0016 TRUSTY LARRY & CINDY 15640 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1457500 IO I/LOI POO 16 WILMOT ROBERT C+CAROL LYNN 13900 160TH SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500131/LOIPOOl6 WOOD ALVIN R+WENDY S 13403 160TH A YE SE RENTON WA 98059 l,_.J59088/LOJP0016 STACHOWIAK C R 15652 SE 139TH PLACE RENTON WA 98055 2006000290/LOIPOOJ6 SULT LINDA R 16022 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 7418000120/LOIPOOl6 WALTER DA YID M+SHARI D 15635 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 3664500132/LOIPOOJ6 WILSON GARY H+YICKIE LEE 13411 160TH SE RENTON WA 98056 1463400047/LOIP0016 ZOLD KEVIN J+DOROTHY L 13615 156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 ® Date oflssuance: Project: Location: King County Department of Development and Environmental Services State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Mitigated Determination Of Non-Significance for Evendell, File No. L01TY401 & L01P0016 December 23, 2002 Proposed is a rezone of 13 acres from R-4 to R-6 and to subdivide the site into 70 lots for detached single-family residences. Should the rezone not be granted, the applicant has proposed an alternative of subdividing the east 11.46 acres under R-4 zoning into 46 lots for detached single-family residential use. Lying south of SE 136'h St. between 156'h Ave. SE and 160th Ave. SE. King County Permits: Rezone & Formal plat County Contact: Proponent: Zoning: Drainage Subbasin: Section/Township/Range: Notes: Karen Scharer, Program/Project Manager II Phone: (206) 296-7114 e-mail -karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Howard Stansbury U.S. Land Development Associates c/o Michael J. Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 -81h Dr. SE Bothell, WA 98021 Phone: 425-486-2563 R-4 Orting Hills subbasin of Cedar River SE 14-23-5 ------------ I I L I ! __ ._J A. This finding is based on review of the project site plan received August 29, 2002 for 70 lots; Alternative plat for 46 lots; revised Environ111ental Checklist, dated October 14, 2002; Preliminary Technical Information Report, dated June, 2001; Level Three Downstream Drainage Analysis, dated August 26, 2002; Addendum to the Level Three Study, dated December 5, 2002; Wetland Evaluation & Delineation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation, and Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Plan, dated May 15, 2001; Addendum wetland/stream/wildlife report, dated May 16, 2000; Traffic !111pact Analysis, dated June 28, 200 I; Traffic Memo, dated January 29, 2002 from Gary Struthers & Assoc., Inc.; and other documents in the file. B. Issuance of this threshold determination does not constitute approval of the permit. This proposal will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County codes which regulate development activities, including the Uniform Fire and Building Codes, Road Standards, Surface Water Design Manual, and the Sensitive Areas RegulE~ihlbfi No. .5" @ Item No~Y>ifQO/' "i-/...Q[,'/40/ Received Z> '"(o -0 3-rulb\~INI ~I!.~ ©@!?'If y \ King County H~aring Examiner Eve.ndell Rezone & Plat MDNS December 23, 2002 Page 2 C. The density with this rezone to R-6 and plat of70 lots would yield an average density of7.4 dwellings per acre (based on the net buildable area) or 5.6 units per acre (based on total area). This density requested is within the density range of 4-12 dwelling units per acre as shown on the Land Use Map of the King County Comprehensive Plan. The majority of lots would range from 3,900 square feet to 6,600 square feet in area. Most lots would also have a width of 45 or 50 feet. Alternative development w/o a rezone would yield a density of 5.2 dwellings per acre (based on the net buildable area) or 4.0 units per acre (based on the total plat area). D. Flooding has occurred in the past along downstream-conveyance structures from the site on 160'h Ave. SE, 156th Ave. SE, and on nearby properties. These drainage issues are documented in the August 26, 2002 Level Three Downstream Analysis and December 5, 2002 Level Three Addendum. The applicant has proposed to address the current severe flooding issues along l 60'h Ave. SE and neighboring properties by upgrading the conveyance system and eliminating constrictions at critical locations. An onsite Level 3 flow control standard (King County's most restrictive release rate) is proposed for the westerly portion of the site flowing to 156th Ave. SE rather than upgrading the downstream structures as only a small portion of the plat drainage flows west. See mitigation below. E. As part of the development of the subject rezone & plat, the applicant will open SE l 36'h St. between 156th Ave. SE & !60'h Ave. SE with full width urban street improvements on the west Y, and half- street improvements on the east Y,. Although no access is planned off 160th Ave. SE, street frontage improvements will include an eight-foot wide paved shoulder. Under the plat only alternative, SE 136th St. would not be opened, access would entirely be off 160"' Ave. SE and ! 60'h Ave. SE would be improved with Y, street urban improvements. F. Renton will provide sewer service. Extension ofa 10" or 12" diameter sewer trunk will be located along SE 136th St. and a sewage pump station will be required on the southeast corner of the property. Threshold Determination The responsible official finds that the above described proposal does not pose a probable significant adverse impact to the environment, provided the mitigation measures listed below are applied as conditions of permit issuance. This finding is made pursuant to RCW 43.2IC, KCC 20.44 and WAC 197-11 after reviewing the environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency and considering mitigation measures which the agency or the applicant will implement as part of the proposal. The responsible official finds this information reasonably sufficient to evaluate the environmental impact of this proposal. Mitigation List The following mitigation measures shall be attached as conditions .of permit issuance. These mitigation measures are consistent with policies, plans, rules, or regulations designated by KCC 20.44.080 as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority and in effect when this threshold determination is issued. Key sources of substantive authority for each mitigation measure are in parentheses; however, other sources of substantive authority may exist but are not expressly listed. A. East Drainage Basin: The 160th Ave SE downstream conveyance system shall be upgraded to provide for the JOO-year storm capacity. Downstream driveway culverts/ditches and a cross-culvert under 160"' Ave. SE shall be improved as follows: Culverts P-117 and P-116 on the west side of 160th Ave. SE, cross-culvert P-115, and culverts P- 114 and P-113 on the east side of 160th Ave. SE shall be improved as needed. The culvert designations are according to the Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis by Haozous Engineering dated August 26, 2002. To address a related localized flooding condition, bank and channel stabilization are also required in the unopened right-of-way for 162"' Ave. SE, in the vicinity of the easterly line of Lot 12, Rich Lea Crest (address 16046 SE 142"' Street). It is estimated that stabilizing and re-grading approximately 50 to I 00 feet ~-..• Ev~ndell Rezone & Plat MDNS December 23, 2002 ) Page 3 of channel, east of 16046 SE 142"' Street, will be adequate to resolve flooding that has occurred in the past location. The culverts and channel described are located from the south site boundary to a distance of approximately· 1,700 feet downstream. Level 2 Flow Control design is required for the proposed stormwater detention facility. A factor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. B. West Drainage Basin: The stormwater detention facilities shall be designed to the Level 3 Flow Control Standard as described in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual(KCSWDM). As an option, Level 2 Flow Control with downstream improvements can be proposed according to Core Requirement 2 of the KCSWDM. The minimum Flow Control Standard shall be Level 2. A factor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. [Comprehensive Plan Policies U-109, E-126, F-254 & F-255; RCW 58.17.110] Comments and Appeals Written comments or any appeal of this threshold determination must be received by King County's Land Use Services Division prior to 4:30 PM, January 16, 2003. Appeals must be accompanied by a nonrefundable filing fee. Please reference the file numbers when corresponding. Appeals must be in writing and state the perceived errors in the threshold determination, specific reasons why the determination should be reversed or modified, the harm the appellant will suffer if the threshold determination remains unchanged, and the desired outcome of the appeal. If the appellant is a group, the harm to any one or more members must be stated. Failure to meet these requirements may result in dismissal of the appeal. Comment/appeal deadline: Appeal filing fee: Address for comment/appeal: Responsible Official: ~~ Current Planning Section Land Use Services Division Date Mailed: December 23, 2002 4:30 PM on January 16, 2003 $250 check or money order made out to the King County Office of Finance King County Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 ATTN: Current Planning Section ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue SW TO: Stafford Smith, Hearing Examiner FM: Karen Sch1IT9', , Current Planning Section Land Use Servi s Division RE: Hearing to Schedule The following cases are ready to have a hearing scheduled. The SEPA MDNS was not appealed. Name: File number: Principal Staff: Time needed for hearing: Principal issues: Community interest: 1 low Evendell LO!TY401 & LO!P0016 Karen Scharer, PPM II Bruce Whittaker, Engineer Kris Langley, Transportation Engineering Laura Casey, Senior Ecologist 1 day Density /Jot size road improvements traffic impacts 2 3 4 Recommendation regarding need for ~ring conference: 1 (___:,/ · 3 4 No 0 high 5 Yes Please note that Gwendolyn High requested a prehearing conference in September 2002 and that correspondence was previously forwarded to you. Suggested earliest hearing date: March 6, 2003 cc: Kim Claussen, Planner JII, Site Plan Review Section Bruce Whittaker, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section Kris Langley, Senior Engineer, DOT Laura Casey, Senior Ecologist, LUSD LP/Hearing.Sch 11/2:2/96-1,09 PM ., • @ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton WA 98055-1219 DATE: TO: FM: RE: January 22, 2003 Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council King County Council Greg Borba, Planning Supervisor Land Use Services Division Introductory Ordinances for Preliminary Plats • Attached are Introductory Ordinance(s) for the Hearing Examiner's agenda scheduled for public hearing, as follows: File No. LOITY401-EVENDELL REZONE scheduled to be heard on March 6, 2003. A copy of the hearing agenda for each item is also attached for your information. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 296-7118. Attachments Evendell rezone Cover Memo.doc ) King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton WA 98055-1219 PRELIMINARY PLAT AGENDA HEARING EXAMINER FOR METROPOLITAN-KING COUNTY COUNCIL LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION, BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK KING COUNTY DDES HEARING ROOM 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW, RENTON WA March 6, 2003 -PUBLIC HEARING 9:30 a.m, or as soon thereafter as possible FILE NO. L0ITY40l EVENDELL REZONE REQUEST Owner: Address/Phone: STR: Location: Proposed Use: Fire District: School District: Evendcll rezone agenda ----------- Howard Stansbury, US Land Development 22617 3th Drive SE,Bothell, WA 98021 Phone: ( 425) 486-2563 14-23-05 Located south of SE 136 1h Street and between 1561h Ave SE and 1601h Avenue SE Rezone 13 acres from R-4 to R-6 and to subdivide the site into 70 lots for detached single-family residences. No. 25 #411 Renton J .- King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton WA 98055-1219 DATE: TO: FM: RE: January 22, 2003 Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council King County Council Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division, Current Planning Section Hearing Examiner's Legal Notice for the Public Hearing Scheduled for March 6, 2003. Attached are multiple copies of the legal notice for the above-noted public hearing. In order to meet our 15 -day legal notice requirement, this notice should be published by February 19, 2003. Attachments Local Newspapers to be notified: (L01TY401, South County Journal & Seattle Times) Evendell rezone newspaper cover memo.doc I • f l " E p R B Ti rn H, sh Le Fro1 Sen To: Su~ Imp Plea plat. Plea Sub, Rezo he r @ King County NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Hearing Examiner of the Metropolitan-King County Council will hold a public hearing on March 6, 2003, at the Department of Development and Environmental Services building, 900 SW Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, starting at the hour listed hereafter, or as soon as possible, and in the order listed for purposes of considering application for a rezone approval. 9:30am. or as soon as thereafter as possible. L01TY401 / Evendell -A Rezone application Rezone 13 acres from R-4 to R-6. Details are available at Blackriver Corporate Plaza, at the Department of Development and Environmental Services, Land Use Services Division, 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest, Renton WA 98055-1219, 206-296-6600 (general information number). Dated this ___ day of ____ • 2003. Evende!! Clerk's legal ad.doc METROPOLITAN-KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ANNE NORIS METROPOLITAN-KING COUNTY COUNCIL ·- Rogers, Carol From: Sent: To: Subject: Importance: • Blossey, Linda Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:10 PM Rogers, Carol FW: Proposed Ordinance for a plat and Rezone High Hi Carol. Here are the proposed numbers: Plat: 2003-0031 Rezone: 2003-0032 • Both will be introduced on the February 3rd Council agenda. And the rezone will be published in the Seattle Times and King County Journal on Wednesday, February 5. FYI--South County Journal and Eastside Journal merged and is called King County Journal. If you need to see the notice, I can send to you. Here is the notice for the paper showing number of ordinance. I'm also attaching a revised newspaper list showing the merge of those two newspapers. Let me know if you need anything else. lwfiS'i 't::.J 2003·0032 Evendell LOITY401.do .. , Paper list.doc -----Original Message----- From: Rogers, Carol Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 2:45 PM To: Council, Clerk Subject: Proposed Ordinance for a plat and Rezone Importance: High Please have the attached ordinances introduced. Your office does need to do a legal ad for the rezone, but not for the plat. Please let me know what the numbers will be and call if you have any questions .. Subdivision - @j Evendell cover memo.doc Rezone - ® Evendell newspaper cover memo .... Evendell Subdivision Agenda.do ... Evendell Clerk's newspaper leg ... Evende!I Plat Ord.doc Evendell rezone cover memo.doc ... Evendel! rezone Plat Ord.doc 1 Evendell rezone Agenda.doc r @ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton WA 98055-1219 DATE: TO: FM: RE: January 22, 2003 Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council King County Council Greg Borba, Planning Supervisor Land Use Services Division Introductory Ordinances for Preliminary Plats Attached are Introductory Ordinance(s) for the Hearing Examiner's agenda scheduled for public hearing, as follows: File No. L01P0016-EVENDELL SUBDIVISION scheduled to be heard on March 6, 2003. A copy of the hearing agenda for each item is also attached for your information. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 296-7118. Attachments Evcndcll Cover Memo.doc _, . ' ·- , @ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton WA 98055-1219 PRELIMINARY PLAT AGENDA HEARING EXAMINER FOR METROPOLITAN-KING COUNTY COUNCIL LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION, BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK KING COUNTY DDES HEARING ROOM 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW, RENTON WA March 6, 2003 -PUBLIC HEARING 9:30 a.m. or as soon thereafter as possible FILE NO. L01TY401 EVENDELL SUBDIVISION REQUEST Owner: Address/Phone: STR: Location: Proposed Use: Fire District: School District: Evendell Agenda.doc Howard Stansbury, US Land Development 22617 3th Drive SE, Bothell, WA 98021 Phone: ( 425) 486-2563 14-23-05 Located south of SE 136 1h Street and between 1561h Ave SE and 1601h Avenue SE Proposed 70 lots in conjuction with proposed rezone to R-6 under DOES file number LOI TY401. No. 25 #411 Renton ' ; TO: FAX NO.: PHONE NO.: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Fax No. 206-296-6613 or 206-296-7051 FAX COVER SHEET Cheryle Packard 206-296-1654 206-296-4660 --Total numbers of pages including this cover sheet: _Q_ Date: From: Carol Rogers Phone: 206-296-7116 Sender's Name Sender's Phone Permit Name/Number: L01P0016 and L01TY401 -Evendell Subdivision and Rezone - Parties of Record list, applicant name & address, property location. COMMENTS: Hearing date is set for March 61 2003. SEPA appeal period will end on January 16, 2003. NO APPEALS FILED Exa mi ncr Fax Cover .doc (f) 4CRE2KS UAC ATTN: CLAUDIA DONNELLY PO BOX 3501 RENTON, WA 98056 BRYANT, RONDA 15406 SE 136TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 CARLSON, MARILYN 13616 156TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 CITY OF RENTON A TIN: REBECCA LIND 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 CLAUSSEN,KIM SR. PLAT PLANNER DDES/CPLN MS: OAK -DE -0100 COFFIN, RONALD 16015 SE 135TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059-6828 DAY, SHIRLEY 14412 167TH PLACE SE RENTON, WA 98059 DORST AD, ROGER EVERGREEN EAST REALTY PO BOX375 REDMOND, WA 98073 GILLEN, NICK WETLAND REVIEW ODES/ SDSS MS: OAK-DE-0100 LOIPOOl6 LOIP0016 LOIPOOl6 L01P0016 LOJPOOl6 L01P0016 LOIP0016 LOIP0016 LOJP0016 HANSON, STEPHEN & YVONNE 15611 SE 138TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 HARBOUR HOMES KURTWlLSON 1010 S. 336TH ST., SUITE #305 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 HEMNES, VALERIE 15627 SE 139TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98058 HIGH, VICTOR & GWENDOLYN 13405 158TH A VENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 HILL, EDWARD, JUNE & KRISTY 13527-156TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 I-IIL TON, EDWARD & NANCY 13414-158THAVENUESE RENTON, WA 98059 HUGHES, KURT 15646 SE 138TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 JAQUES, FRED AND HELGA 13114 158TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 JOHNSTON, LEONARD J. 16016 SE 135TH RENTON, WA 98059 LOIPOOl6 LOIP0016 LOJP0016 LOIPOOl6 LOIP0016 LOIPOOl6 LOIP0016 LOIP0016 LOJP0016 KC EXECUTIVE HORSE COUNCIL ELEANOR MOON 12230NE61ST KIRKLAND, WA 98033 KEZELE, DON I 5657 SE I 3 7TH PLACE RENTON WA 98059 LANGLEY, KRISTEN LAND USE TRAFFIC DDES/CPLN MS: OAK -DE-0100 LEE,JOANN I 3802 160TH A VENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 LEX. TIM & GINA !3116158THAVESE RENTON, WA 98059 LYMAN, STEVE 14505 -160TH A VENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 MARCY, JERRY POST OFFICE BOX 575 SEATTLE, WA 98111 MARTIN, FRED & GLORIA 13019160TIIAVESE RENTON, WA 98059 MOKIN,BlLL 14404 162ND A VENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOl6 LOIP0016 LOIP0016 LOIP0016 L01P0016 LOIPOOl6 L01P0016 LOIP0016 MUHICH, STEVEN & PERI 13420 160TH A VENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 NIPERT, SALLY 14004156THAVESE RENTON, WA 98059 NOTT, FLORENCE 15915 SE 134TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 OLIPHANT, RICHARD & ANITA 16519 SE 145TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 PETRIE, DA VE 811 SOUTH 273RD COURT DES MOINES, WA 98198 PLATT, DAVID 5!0 PANORAMIC DRIVE CAMANO ISLAND, WA 98282 ROGERS, CAROL CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DDES/CPLN MS: OAK -DE-0100 ROLLINGER, MARSHA 15646 SE 138TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 ROMANO, MICHAEL CENTURIAN DEVEL. SERVICES 22617 8TH DR SE BOTHELL, WA 98021 LOIP0016 LOIP0016 L01POOl6 LOIPOOl6 LOIP0016 LOIP0016 L01P0016 LOIP0016 LOIPOOl6 SCHAliR. KAREN PROJECT PLANNER MS: OAK -DE-0100 DDES/CPLN SCHOLES, GENEVA l2924158TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 SCHUSTER. CURTIS G JOHN L SCOTT REAL ESTATE 12505 BEL-RED RD, STE 212 BELLEVUE WA 98005 SCOBY, CHARLES & VIOLA Ill 12158TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059-8531 SIDEBOTHAM, KAREN & JEFFREY 13004 158TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 SLATON, DANIEL B. 15315 SE 133RD COURT RENTON, WA 98059 STANSBURY, HOWARD US LAND DEVL. ASSOC/CENTURION 22617 8TH DRSE BOTHELL, WA 98021 STREIT, PEGGY 13512160THAVENUESE RENTON, WA 98059 THORBECK, PENNY 15650 SE I 38TH PL RENTON, WA 98059 LOIP0016 LOIP0016 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOI6 LOIPOOI6 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOl6 WA ST.ECOLOGY DEPT/ WQSW UNIT ATTN: LINDA MATLOCK PO BOX 47696 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7696 WATLER, DAVID 15635 SE 138TH PL. RENTON, WA 98059 WEST.LARRY GEO REVIEW DDES/SDSS MS: OAK· DE-0100 WHITTAKER. BRUCE PRELIMINARY REVIEW ENGINEER DDES/ERS MS: OAK -DE-0100 WILMOT, MR. & MRS. 13900 160TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 WOLBERG, ALVIN 16021 SE 136TH STREET RENTON, WA 98059 ZEEK, HAROLD & ELEANOR 16621 SE 145TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 LOIPOOI6 LOIPOOI6 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOl6 LOIP0016 LOIP0016 @ ., Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 File#: L01TY401 & L01P0016 No~·ce of Recommendation and Hearing (Type 3 & 4) Name of Project · Evendell Applicant: Consultant: Project Location: Project: King County Permits: Permit/SEPA Contact: Threshold Determination: Community Plan: Drainage Subbasin: Section/Township/Range: Howard Stansbury U.S. Land Development Associates Phone: 425-486-2563 Mike Romano, Centurion Development Services 2217 8'" Dr. SE, Bothell, WA 98021 Phone: 425-486-2563 Located south of SE 136 1h between 1561h Ave. SE and 160'h Ave. SE Proposed is a rezone of 13 acres from R-4 to R-6 and to subdivide the site into 70 lots for detached single-family residences. Should the rezone not be granted, the applicant has proposed an alternative of subdividing the east 11.46 acres under R-4 zoning into 46 lots for detached single-family residential use. Rezone L0ITY401, Subdivision L0IPOOl6 Karen Scharer, Planner 206-296-7114 or e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Mitigated Determination ofNonsignificance Newcastle Zoning: R-4 Orting Hills subbasin of Cedar River 14-23-05 Department Recommendation to the Hearing Examiner: Approve subject to conditions Date of Public Hearing: Location of Public Hearing: March 6, 2003 at 9:30 a.m. DOES Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 The Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) will issue a written report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two weeks prior to the scheduled public hearing. Persons wishing to receive a copy of the report should contact ODES at the address listed below. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written recommendation for the rezone and a decision for the plat which may be appealed to the Metropolitan-King County Council. Appeal procedures will be stated in the Examiner's written recommendation and decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact ODES at the address and/or telephone number listed below. Written comments may also be submitted to DOES. A public hearing as required by law will be held to consider the approval of this application. If the Renton School District announces a district-wide school closure due to adverse weather conditions or similar area emergency, the public hearing on this matter will be postponed. Interested parties will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any questions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296 -6640 If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call (206) 296-6640 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TT'{). F96\SFRS\NOTR&H.T-J clc 2/6/9B DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ADDENDUM REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER March 6, 2003 -PUBLIC HEARING AT 9:30 AM Hearing Room at DDES 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Phone: (206) 296-6600 REZONE & PROPOSED PLAT OF EVENDELLi FILE NO's: L01TY401 & L01P0016 i PROPOSED REZONE ORDINANCE NO: #2003-0032 I_ J' PROPOSED PLAT ORDINANCE NO. #2003-0031 ------- The purpose of this addendum report is to provide supplementary information regarding schools servicing the property and school impact mitigation measures, as well as provide a set ofrecommended conditions for the R-4 / 46 lot plat alternative. E. AGENCIES CONT ACTED: REVISE 4. Renton School District: See Attaeh!fleat 8 aaa comments contained in the Addendum report. ADD 12. Issaquah School District: See Attachment 8 and comments contained in report. J. PUBLIC SERVICES: REVISE 1. Schools: This proposal has been reviewed under RCW 58.17.110 and King County Code 21A.28 (School Adequacy). a. School Facilities: The subject subdivision will be served by the Renton School District (Maplewood Heights, McKnight, & Hazen High schools) and Issaquah School District (see Attachment 8 of the preliminary report for Issaquah schools serving the site). b. School Capacity: The Renton School Board has not adopted capacity figures which indicate their ability to accommodate additional students. The district therefore anticipates adequate capacity to accommodate the students generated by this proposal. The Issaquah School Board has adopted capacity figures which indicate their ability to accommodate additional students. The capacity figures for 2004 through 2008 show a at the minimum an excess capacity of 779 per the 2002 Capital Facilities Plan for the District. The figures reveal the district has adequate capacity to accommodate the anticipated students generated by this proposal c. School Impact Fees: No ordinance requiring impact fees for tltts the Renton school district has been adopted. The Issaquah School District has adopted a fee of $3,924 for each new single family residential unit. A total of 60 dwellings would be added to the Issaquah District. ~xhlbll No ..... 3&-l>R __ _ 1mm NIJ, LOtf OOIL ~ L~rJfuJA~lfrUllE <cOl?V R~~§IV~!i ;) ' le~ 0) i(iRij IJ~Uf\ly lio~rtl\Q Examiner ',._,:" L01TY401 and L01P0016 Evendell Addendum Report Page 2 d. School Access: The Renton School District has indicated in a that future students from this subdivision will be bussed from the intersection of Se 136th St. and 156'" Ave. SE. The Issaquah District has indicated that the future students from this subdivision will be bussed from the intersection of SE 136ht St. and 160th Ave. SE. Curb, gutter and sidewalks are proposed on the south side of SE 136th St. to provide a walking surface between 160'" Ave. SE and 156'" Ave. SE. P. RECOMMENDATIONS: ADD-70 LOT PLAT CONDITIONS ... School Mitgation Fees 21. Lots within this subdivision east of 158th Ave. SE are subject to King County Code 21 A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected immediately prior to recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. LOITY401 and LOIPOOl6 Evendell Addendum Report Page 3 ADD the additional alternative recommendation and conditions which should be considered if the rezone is denied: DOES RECOMMENDATION for L01P0016-ALTERNATIVE 46 LOT PLAT If the reclassification to R-6 is denied, grant preliminary approval of the 46 lot subdivision, received March 26, 2002, subject to the following conditions of final approval: 1. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19 of the King County Code. 2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plat a dedication which includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952. 3. The plat shall comply with the base density (and minimum density) requirements of the R-4 zone classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-4 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, whichever is larger, except that minor revisions to the plat which do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. 4. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended (1993 KCRS). 5. The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow standards of Chapter 17 .08 of the King County Code. 6. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location oflots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and applicable updates adopted by King County. DOES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DOES Engineering Review, shall be shown on the engineering plans. c. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings# on file with DOES and/or the King County Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for individual lot infiltration systems, the systems shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with plans on file." d. The stormwater detention design shall comply with the Level 2 Flow Control requirements per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). e. The storm water control facility shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King County unless portions of the drainage tract are used for required recreation space in accordance with KCC 21A.14.180. 7. Drainage adjustment L02V0024 is approved for this project. All conditions of approval for this adjustment shall be met upon submittal of the engineering plans. See Attachment 9. LOITY401 and LOJP0016 Evendell Addendum Report Page 4 8. The following road improvements are required to be constructed according to the 1993 King County Road Standards(KCRS): a. SE 137'" St. shall be improved to the urban subcollector standard. b. The internal loop road(l58th Pl SE, SE 138th ST, and 159th Pl SE) shall be improved to the urban subaccess street standard. c. The short cul-d-sac road off SE 137th ST shall be improved to the urban minor access street standard. d. FRONTAGE: The frontage along 160th Ave SE(west side only) shall be improved to the urban neighborhood collector standard. e. Tracts A, B, and D shall be improved to the joint use driveway standard per Section 3.01 oftheKCRS. f. Tract C shall be improved to the private access tract standard per Section 2.09 of the KCRS. g. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered according to the variance provisions in Section 1.08 of the KCRS. 9. There shall be no direct vehicular access to or from 160"' Ave. SE from those lots, which abut this street. A note to this effect shall appear on the engineering plans and final plat. I 0. Eighteen feet ofright-of way shall be dedicated for future road improvements on SE 136"' St. from 158'' Ave. NE to 160th Ave. NE. 11. Off-site access to the subdivision shall be over a full-width, dedicated and improved road that has been accepted by King County for maintenance. If the proposed access road has not been accepted by King County at the time of recording, then said road shall be fully bonded by the applicant of this subdivision. 12. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final plat recording. 13. The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by the applicable fee ordinance. The applicant has the option to either:(!) pay the MPS fee at final plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. lfthe first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid." lfthe second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building permit application. 14. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the Sensitive Areas Code as outlined in KCC 21A.24. Preliminary plat review has identified the following specific requirements that apply to this project. All other applicable requirements from KCC 21 A.24 shall also be addressed by the applicant. a. This site contains a Class 2 wetland. The wetland will be protected from alteration during and after construction, with a 50-foot wide buffer around the wetland boundary. An additional 15-foot building setback is required beyond the edge of the buffer. b. Road improvements for 160th Avenue SE will eliminate an area of wetland buffer. Mitigation shall consist of providing at least an equivalent area of buffer added to the northeast portion of the site. c. Downstream drainage improvements to existing culverts and stormwater conveyances required through the SEPA MDNS shall cause no adverse alteration to existing wetlands or streams in the vicinity of the drainage improvements. LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell Addendum Report Page 5 d. Critical Areas staff shall review engineering plans for the plat for conformance with these requirements. 15. The following note shall be shown on the final engineering plan and recorded plat: RESTRICTIONS FOR SENSITIVE AREA TRACTS AND SENSITIVE AREAS AND BUFFERS Dedication of a sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. This interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the land subject to the tract/sensitive area and buffer the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by King County, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. The vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without approval in writing from the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services or its successor agency, unless otherwise provided by law. The common boundary between the tract/sensitive area and buffer and the area of development activity must be marked or otherwise flagged ·to the satisfaction of King County prior to any clearing, grading, building construction or other development activity on a lot subject to the sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer. The required marking or flagging shall remain in place until all development proposal activities in the vicinity of the sensitive area are completed. No building foundations are allowed beyond the required 15-foot building setback line, unless otherwise provided by law. 16. Suitable recreation space shall be provided consistent with the requirements KCC 2 IA.14.180 and KCC 2 IA.14.190 in providing sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic table[s], benches, etc .. a. A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) shall be submitted for review and approval by DOES and King County Parks prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the engineering plans. This plan shall comply with Ordinance # 14045. b. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording. of the plat. · 17. A homeowners' association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction of ODES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation, open space and/or sensitive area tract(s). 18. Street trees shall be included in the design of all road improvements, and shall comply with Section 5.03 of the KCRS and KCC 21A.16.050: a. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. b. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. c. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. d. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. LOITY401 and LOIP0016 . Evendell Addendum Report Page 6 e. The species of trees shall be approved by DOES if located within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. f. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by DOES prior to engineering plan approval. g. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording, of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year ofrecording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after ODES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. A landscape inspection fee shall also be submitted prior to plat recording. The inspection fee is subject to change based on current County fees. School Mitigation Fees 19. Lots within this subdivision east of 158'h Ave. SE are subject to King County Code 21A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected immediately prior to recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. 20. The following have been established by SEPA as necessary requirements to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of this development. The applicants shall demonstrate compliance with these items prior to final approval. a. East Drainage Basin: The 160th Ave. SE downstream conveyance system shall be upgraded to provide for the JOO-year storm capacity. Downstream driveway culverts/ditches and a cross-culvert under 160'h Ave. SE shall be improved as follows: Culverts P-117 and P-116 on the west side of !60ili Ave. SE, cross- culvert P-115, and culverts P-114 and P-113 on the east side of 160'h Ave. SE shall be improved as needed. The culvert designations are according to the Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis by Haozous Engineering dated August 26, 2002. To address a related localized flooding condition, bank and channel stabilization are also required in the unopened right-of-way for 162"' Ave. SE, in the vicinity of the easterly line of Lot 12, Rich Lea Crest (address 16046 SE 142"' Street). It is estimated that stabilizing and re-grading approximately 50 to 100 feet of channel, east of 16046 SE 142"' Street, will be adequate to resolve flooding that has occurred in the pas.I location. The culverts and channel described are located from the south site boundary to a distance of approximately I, 700 feet downstream. Level 2 Flow Control design is required for the proposed stormwater detention facility. A factor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. b. West Drainage Basin: The stormwater detention facilities shall be designed to the Level 3 Flow Control Standard as described in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). As an option, Level 2 Flow Control with downstream improvements can be proposed according to Core Requirement 2 of the KCSWDM. The minimum Flow Control Standard shall be Level 2. A factor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. • ' ' ' ~ • I DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER March 6, 2003 -PUBLIC HEARING AT 9°:30 AM Hearing Room at DDES 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Phone: (206) 296-6600 REZONE & PROPOSED PLAT OF EVENDELL FILE NO's: L01TY401 & L01P0016 PROPOSED REZONE ORDINANCE NO: #2003-0032 PROPOSED PLAT ORDINANCE NO. #2003-0031 A. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION: This is a request for reclassification of 13 acres from R-4 (Residential 4 dwellings per acre) to R-6 (Residential 6 dwellings per acre) and subdivision of approximately 12 acres of the property into 70 lots mostly ranging from 3,900 square feet to 6,600 square feet. The west 200 feet of the rezone area is not part of the plat, but will be kept as a large 26,000 sq. ft. parcel with the existing single family house, garage and pool to remain. As part of the plat, two recreation areas and two drainage detention areas are proposed. A second residence inside the plat will also be retained. Access to the lots is proposed via SE 136th Street. See Attachment 1 -the rezone area and Attachment 2 -the proposed plat map. A 46 lot plat based on the existing R-4 zoning on the east 11.46 acres was also submitted as an alternative plan should the rezone not be approved. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner: Representative: U.S. Land Development Association P.O. Box 22200 Seattle, WA 98122 Michael Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 8'" Dr. SE, Bothell, WA 98021 Phone: 425-486-2563 Facsimile: (425) 486-3273 e-mail: michael.j.romano@gte.net -----~ je>< 3A I I L~-__ J Location: Lying south of SE 136'h St. between I56'h Ave. SE and 160'" Ave. SE. Acreage Rezone/Plat: 13 acres Zoning: Existing R-4 to Proposed R-6 Number of Lots: 70 Density: 5.6 dwellings per acre with 7.4 dwellings per net acre Lot Size: 3,900 to 6,600 square feet Proposed Use: single family Sewage Disposal: City of Renton Water Supply: Water District #90 Fire District: King County Fire District# 25 School District: Renton Complete Application Date: September 20, 200 I Kina Cmmiy HOarlng Examiner @ ' • ' ' . L01TY401 and L01P0016 Evendell Threshold Determination: Mitigated Determination ofNonsignificance (MONS) Date oflssuance: December 23, 2002 King County Permits: Rezone & Subdivision Permit Contact: Karen Scharer, Project Manager II, Current Planning Section, LUSD Phone# 296-7114 or e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Community Plan: Newcastle Drainage Subbasin: Lower Cedar River Section/Township/Range: SE 14-23-05 Parcels# 142305 9022 & 9009 C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: D. I. The Subdivision Technical Committee (STC) of King County has conducted an on-site examination of the subject property. The SIC has discussed the proposed development with the applicant to clarify technical details of the application, and to determine the compatibility of this project with applicable King County plans, codes, and other official documents regulating this development. As a result of discussions, the applicant presented the STC with a conceptual build out plan of the immediate neighborhood (Attachment 2), revised plans for frontage road improvements, submitted a revised traffic study including pipeline development projects. Subsequently, DOES was able to obtain claims submitted to King County for drainage problems, which were then reviewed by the applicant, and an updated Level 3 drainage report was submitted December 9, 2002. In mid December 2002, the SIC determined that there was sufficient information presented to proceed with issuance of a SEPA TD and scheduling of a public hearing on the requests. 2. Under KCC 20.20.070, the request for rezone (Type 4 permit) is not vested under regulations in effect at the time of complete rezone application. Vesting to zoning can only occur once the zone becomes effective. The plat application (Type 3 permit) is based on the rezone to R-6; therefore the plat can not be vested to zoning. If the rezone were denied, the applicant's alternative plat layout under the existing R-4 zone is vested and could move forward through the hearing process. THRESHOLD DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE: Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C, the responsible official of the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) issued a threshold determination -mitigated determination of non-significance (MONS) for the proposed development on December 23, 2002. This dete.rmination was based on the review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent documents, resulting in the conclusion that the proposal would not cause probable significant adverse impacts on the environment with implementation of mitigation for the proposal. Therefore, an environmental impact statement (EIS) was not required prior to proceeding with the review process. Agencies, affected Native American tribes and the public were offered the opportunity to comment on or appeal the determination for 21 days. The MONS was not appealed by any party, including the applicant, and it has been incorporated as part of the applicant's proposal. The MONS states: The following mitigation measures shall be attached as conditions of permit issuance. These mitigation measures are consistent with policies, plans, rules, or regulations designated by KCC 20.44.080 as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority and in effect when this threshold determination is issued. Key sources of substantive authority for each mitigation measure are in parentheses; however, other sources of substantive authority may exist but are not expressly listed. 2 • • r A. East Drainage Basin: LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell The 160th Ave SE downstream conveyance system shall be upgraded to provide for the 100-year storm capacity. Downstream driveway culverts/ditches and a cross-culvert under 16(/• Ave. SE shall be improved as follows: Culverts P-117 and P-116 on the west side of ]6(/• Ave. SE, cross-culvert P-115, and culverts P-114 and P-113 on the east side of J 6(/• Ave. SE shall be improved as needed. The culvert designations are according to the Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis by Haozous Engineering dated August 26, 2002. To address a related localized flooding condition, bank and channel stabilization are also required in the unopened right-of way for l 62"d Ave. SE, in the vicinity of the easterly line of Lot 12, Rich Lea Crest (address 16046 SE l 42"d Street). It is estimated that stabilizing and re-grading approximately 50 to 100 feet of channel, east of 16046 SE l 42"d Street, will be adequate to resolve flooding that has occurred in the past location. The culverts and channel described are located from the south site boundary to a distance of approximately 1,700 feet downstream. Level 2 Flow Control design is required for the proposed stormwater detention facility. A factor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. B. West Drainage Basin: The stormwater detention facilities shall be designed to the Level 3 Flow Control Standard as described in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). As an option, Level 2 Flow Control with downstream improvements can be proposed according to Core Requirement 2 of the KCSWDM. The minimum Flow Control Standard shall be Level 2. A factor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. [Comprehensive Plan Policies U-109, E-126, F-254 & F-255; RCW 58.17.110} E. AGENCIES CONT ACTED: 1. King County Natural Resources & Parks Division: No response. 2. King County Fire Protection Engineer: Fire protection engineering preliminary approval has been granted as requested. 3. Seattle-King County Health Department: No response. 4. Renton School District: See Attachment 8 and comments contained in report. 5. Water District# 90: See Attachment 7. 6. City of Renton/ Sewer: See Attachments 5 & 6. 7. Washington State Department of Ecology: No response. 8. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife: No response. 9. Washington State Department of Natural Resources: No response. 10. Washington State Department of Transportation: No response. 11. METRO: No response. 3 ' r L01TY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell F. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT: 1. Topography: The site is relatively level with a 20-foot difference in elevation from the north central area to the southwest and to the southeast corners of the site. 2. Soils: Surface soils are found on this site per King County Soil Survey, 1973 include: AgC -Alderwood gravely, sandy loam; 6-15 % slopes. Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil type has a moderate limitation for low building foundations due to a seasonally high water table, and severe limitations for septic tank filter fields due to very slow permeability in the substratum. · 3. Sensitive Areas:· The site has been field checked. There is a Class II Wetland located on the northeast portion of the site according to the LUSD wetland ecologist assigned to review this project. The 17,162-sq. ft. wetland is classified as a palustrine, forested, seasonally flooded/saturated & palustrine, emergent, seasonally flooded. The Addendum to the Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report dated 10/28/02 clarified that the proposal was revised so that buffer averaging is no longer part of the proposal. Road improvements will cause filling of200-sq. ft. wetland, with 400-sq. ft. of mitigation proposed. Road improvements will impact 6,989-sq. ft. of wetland buffer. An additional 15,495-sq. ft. of buffer is proposed in the NE corner of site to provide mitigation at a ratio greater than 2 to 1. Improvements to the downstream drainage system through up sizing culverts will have to be reviewed to ensure that no wetlands are being drained or flooded as a result, no streams placed in pipes, or no streams damaged by increased flows downstream from replaced culverts. Up sizing culverts in a sensitive area requires a clearing and grading permit. · 4. Hydrography: A preliminary June 15, 2001, technical information report was prepared by Haozous Engineering, P.S. on June 15, 2001. Subsequently a Level 3 Downstream Analysis was submitted August 26, 2002 and a Level Three Addendum was submitted December 5, 2002. The site is within the Orting Hills subbasin of the Cedar River watershed. Flooding has occurred in the past along downstream conveyance structures from the site on 160th Ave. SE, 156th Ave. SE, and on nearby properties. These drainage issues are documented in the Level Three Downstream Analyses and Addendum. 5. Vegetation: The westerly 2.5 acres is mostly covered by pasture with some trees central and on the east edge. More than half of the east 11 acre area is wooded with a conifer upland forest and primarily Douglas fir. The far south of the parcel is developed with pasture and the north central area has partially been cleared as yard area associated with the home and south central includes deciduous trees and native shrubs. 6. Wildlife: A wildlife study in conjunction with the Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation, and Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Plan was prepared for this site and dated May 15, 2001. A large variety of small birds and animals were observed on site. Black tail deer and ruffed grouse both "Priority Species" of Washington State were observed. A single "State Candidate" species -the pileated woodpecker -was observed to utilize the forested wetland area along with adjacent upland forested area onsite per page 12 of the report. According to ODES staff Senior Ecologist, none of the species identified in the applicant's report are required to be protected in the urban designated part of the County where this project lies. And, there was no specific information provided in the citizens' documentation to indicate the presence of nesting sites on the proposal property for any protected species. However with preservation of the wetland and a 50-foot buffer, habitat will indeed be protected. 4 ... G. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell The site is located in the Renton Highlands area. Properties located nearby vary in size from large 5-acre parcels to small urban lots. The neighborhood is rapidly changing from a rural- suburban character to an urbanized area with mostly single family homes and some related services such as schools, a fire station, churches and parks. Developed lots immediately nearby are on septic systems. These lots are approximately 9,000 square feet to 30,000 square feet in size. However, directly north and south of the eastern portion of the site is a 5 and 4 acre tract respectively, each developed with a single-family house. Many of the parcels are currently considered as under utilized for the urban R-4 zone designation. · Zoning surrounding of Evendell is mostly R-4. R-8 zoning is designated on the 60 lot plat of Highland Estates located west of 156'" Ave. SE and south of SE 136'" St. (Files LOOTY 402 & LOOP0009). Sewer service will be provided to this development. The proposed plat of Hamilton Place (L02POOl l) is located on property 700 feet north of the site between 156'" Ave. SE & 160'" Ave. SE. Lots proposed would average approximately 5,000-sq. ft. each. Transfer of 6 density credits to this plat is proposed. The recently platted parcel of "5 Lot Subdivision", LOOP0023 is located southeast off 162nd Ave. SE and contains 5 lots averaging .9 d.u.'s per acre. DDES has also held pre-application meetings for three other plats in the immediate area, including the property directly north of the east portion ofEvendell and property east of 160'" Ave. SE. Timing for submittal of these applications is currently unknown. The City of Renton city limits are approximately 1,300 feet to the west of the site at the southeast comer of the plat of Maplewood which is under construction. City of Renton zoning within this plat includes the designations ofR-5 and R-8. On-Site: The east 11 acres of the site is currently developed with one single family home, detached garage and out buildings. The house is to remain and will be on Lot #52 of the plat. The remaining accessory buildings will be removed. The most westerly 200 feet on the west 2.5 acres of the rezone is outside of the plat boundary. A house, garage and pool are located in this area. The other buildings: associated shop, carport and greenhouse are all within the plat boundary and these structures will be removed prior to final plat. A lot line adjustment is to be completed prior to final platting of Evendell to revise the boundary to except out the house on the west portion of the property. H. SUBDIVISION DESIGN FEATURES: I. Lot Pattern and Density: The proposed lot and street layout is in conformance with King County Codes (i.e. KCC 21 A and the 1993 King County Road Standards. Density calculations for the plat average 5.6 d.u.'s per acre. The 70 lots ranging from 3,900 square feet to 6,600 square feet. 2. Internal Circulation: Most lots will front onto a public street that provides an internal loop street within the subdivision and exits out to SE 136'" Street. Private access tracts (PAT's) and Joint Use Development Tracts (JUDT's) connect to the public (loop) street will serve a few other lots. The remaining lots on the west side of the plat will front on PAT's & JUDT's off SE 136'" Street. See the proposed plat layout, Attachment 2 to this report. Attachment 3 shows the alternative 46 lot plat design for the east 11 acres should the proposed rezone and 70 lot plat not be approved. 5 ' ( LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell 3. Roadway Section: As proposed, SE 136tl' Street would be improved with urban improvements along the north & south sides of street frontage between 156th Ave. SE and 158th Ave. SE, but without sidewalks on the north side. Between 158'" Ave. SE and 160th Ave. SE, 136'" St. will be improved with a half street with curb, gutter and sidewalks on the south side. Shoulder improvements with 8-feet wide paving are planned for the right of way on the west side of160'" Ave. SE that abuts the east boundary of the site. The public loop street serving most. lots within the plat will be improved as an urban subaccess street with the access between SE 136'" St. and the loop (158'" Ave. SE) will be improved as an urban subcollector. Sidewalks will be provided on the outside curve of the loop street. The six J.U.D.T. will each serve two lots and the three P.A.T. will each serve more than three lots. 4. Drainage: The plat is required to comply with the 1998 King County Drainage Manual. A SWM Adjustment (File No. L02V0024) was approved for the subdivision allowing .15 acres of the western subbasin to be added into the eastern subbasin & the western subbasin controlled outflow will be released farther upstream in the ditch system of 156th Ave. SE. Detention for the west portion of the development will be placed on the southwest comer of the plat and detention for the east portion of the site will be located on the south east comer of the site. The applicant has proposed to address the current severe flooding issues along 160th Ave. SE and neighboring properties by upgrading the conveyance system and eliminating constrictions at critical locations. An onsite Level 3 flow control standard (King County's most restrictive release rate) is proposed for the westerly portion of the site flowing to 156th Ave. SE rather than upgrading the downstream structures as only a small portion of the plat drainage flows west. Also see Section D. of this report regarding the SEPA MDNS drainage improvements. I. TRANSPORTATION PLANS: I. Transportation Plans: The King County Transportation Plan indicates that SE l 36thth Street is a non-Arterial Road. The King County Nonmotorized Transportation Plan does not designate this roadway for bicycles of equestrian use. The subject subdivision is not in conflict with this plan, nor with the King County Regional Trails Plan or Nonmotorized Plan. 2. Subdivision Access: The subdivision will gain access from SE 136th Street with most trips via 156'" Ave SE. A south bound left tum lane from 156'" Ave SE will be provided to assure safe access onto SE 136'h Street. SE 136'" St. between 156th Ave. SE and 158th Ave. SE will be improved to an urban neighborhood collector standard with curb, gutter and sidewalks on the south side; and, curb and gutters on the north side. At 158th Ave. SE to 160th Ave. SE, this street portion will be improved as a neighborhood collector with urban half street improvements. Nine lots could have direct access to SE 136'h Street, instead, streets and access tracts have been sized to provide alternative access to these lots. The remaining 61 lots will front on the internal loop or other private access tracts. 3. Traffic Generation: It is expected that approximately 700 vehicle trips per day will be generated with full development of the proposed subdivision. This calculation includes service vehicles (i.e., mail delivery, garbage pick-up, school bus) which may currently serve this neighborhood, as well as work trips, shopping, etc. 6 J. LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell 4. Adequacy of Arterial Roads: This proposal has been reviewed under the criteria in King County Code 14.70, Transportation Concurrency Management; 14.80, Intersection Standards; and King County Code 14.75; Mitigation Payment System. a. King County Code 14.70 -Transportation Concurrency Management: The Transportation Certificate of Concurrency indicates that transportation improvements or strategies will be in place at the time of development, or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies within six (6) years, according to RCW 36.70A.070(6). b. · King County Code 14.80 -Intersection Standards: The existing arterial system will accommodate the increased traffic volume generated by this proposal. c. King County Code 14.75 -Mitigation Payment System: King County Code 14. 75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), requires the payment of a traffic impact mitigation fee (MPS fee) and an administration fee for each single family residential lot or unit created. MPS fees are determined by the zone in which the site is located. This site is in Zone 452 per the MPS/Quartersection list. MPS fees may be paid at the time of final plat recording, or deferred until building permits are issued. The amount of the fee will be determined by the applicable fee ordinance at the time the fee is collected. PUBLIC SERVICES: I. Schools: This proposal has been reviewed under RCW 58.17 .110 and King County Code 2 IA.28 (School Adequacy). a. School Facilities: The subject subdivision will be served by the Renton School District (see Attachment 8 for schools serving the site). b. School Capacity: The Renton School Board has not adopted capacity figures which indicate their ability to accommodate additional students. The district therefore anticipates adequate capacity to accommodate the students generated by this proposal. c. School Impact Fees: No ordinance requiring impact fees for this school district has been adopted. d. School Access: The District has indicated that the future students from this subdivision will be bussed from the intersection of SE 136ht St. and 160th Ave. SE. Curb, gutter and sidewalks are proposed on the south side of SE 136th St. to provide a walking surface between 160th Ave. SE and 156th Ave. SE. 2. Parks and Recreation Space: The nearest public park is located on the south west comer of l 52"d Ave. SE and SE 136th St. The applicant has proposed on-site recreation including two recreation areas, Tract Non the west end and tracts L & Mon the southeast area of the plat. The details of improvements will be designed and submitted for approval prior to final plat. KCC 21 A.14 requires subdivisions in the UR and R zone classifications to either provide on-site recreation space or pay a fee to the Parks Division for establishment and maintenance of neighborhood parks. The required recreation area per code equals 27,300 sq. ft. Tract L will contain 15,088 sq. ft. and the remaining 12,212 sq. ft. required will be provided within the two drainage tracts, Tracts M & N. 7 ',. LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell Per KCC 21A.14.180 E, one tot lot and three additional playground/recreational facilities will be required. The applicant plans to locate one recreation feature on Tract N and other two features designed with the tot Jot as part of tracts Land M. The stonn/recreation tracts will be required to comply with standards ofKCC 21A.14.180. Specifically, Tracts L and M will be required to be recorded as one tract per KCC 21 A.14.180 G. 3. Fire Protection: The Certificate of Water Availability from Water District 90 indicates that water is presently available to the site in sufficient quantity to satisfy King County Fire Flow Standards. Prior to final recording of the plat, the water service facilities must be reviewed and approved per King County Fire Flow Standards. K. UTILITIES: L. I. Sewage Disposal: A Certificate of Sewer Availability, dated May 18, 2001 indicates the city's capability to serve the proposed development (see Attachment 6). A sewage pump station will be constructed on the southeast comer of the plat as the property currently can not be served by gravity flow. By providing a pump station, approximately 37 acres in the immediate area will sewer available. The existing sewer line will be extended east along SE 136th Street to the subject property to provide connection to Renton's sewer system. 2. Water Supply: The applicant proposes to serve the subject subdivision with water from Water District 90. A Certificate of Water Availability, dated May 30, 2001, indicates this district's capability to serve the proposed development (see Attachment 7). COMPREHENSIVE AND COMMUNITY PLAN: 1. Comprehensive Plan 2000 Land Use Map: This proposal is governed by the 2000 King County Comprehensive Plan with Land Use Map that designates this area as "Urban Residential, 4-12 dwellings per acre". 2. The following policies and principles of the Comprehensive Plan are relevant to the proposed rezone and subdivision: a. Chapter 2-Urban Land Use, B. Residential Land Use, Section# 2 U-114 King County shall seek to achieve through future planning efforts over the next twenty years, an average zoning density of at least seven to eight homes per acre in the Urban Growth Area through a mix of densities and housing types. A lower density zone may be used to recognize existing subdivisions with little or no opportunity for infill or redevelopment. U-118 King County should apply minimum density requirements to all urban residential zones of four or more homes per acre, except under limited circumstances such as the: a. Presence of significant physical constraints, or b. Implementation of standards applied to a property through a property-specific development condition, special district overlay, or subarea plan. Comment: The proposal would yield an overall density of 5.6 dwellings per acre. b. Chapter 2-Urban Land Use, B. Residential Land Use, Section# 3.-Increases of Zoning Density: While King County supports higher densities in the urban areas, increased densities that would be incompatible with existing neighborhoods or cause significant impacts on roads. services and 8 •• LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell the environment are discouraged. The following policies will guide decisions on application of densities and proposed rezones. U-120 King County shall not approve proposed zoning changes to increase density within the Urban Area unless: a. The development will be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhood; Comment: The area is in transition from an under utilized urban area to a neighborhood that is shifting to more of an urban area with a full range of urban services for the residents. There are other similar residential developments in the neighborhood currently under construction or in the planning stages (see Section G of this report). b. Urban public facilities and services are adequate, consistent with adopted levels of service and meet GMA concurrency requirements, including King County transportation concurrency standards; Comment: Urban services are available to the property and concurrency standards are met. c. The proposed density change will not increase unmitigated adverse impacts on environmentally sensitive areas, either on site or in the vicinity of the proposed development; Comment: The Class II Wetland on the site will be preserved under the Standards ofKCC 21A.24. Drainage will be mitigated through the implementation of the 1998 KC Drainage Manual and through the SEPAMDNS. d. The proposed density increase will be consistent with or contribute to achieving the goals and policies of this Comprehensive Plan, and subarea plan, if applicable; and Comment: The proposed density is within the density range of 4-12 dwellings per acre as designated by the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Also see the Analysis Section of this report. e. The proposal is consistent with the adopted city comprehensive plan for the Potential Annexation Area where the rezone is located if the proposed density exceeds eight dwelling units per acre. If the city is not planning for urban densities and efficient land use patterns consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies, then this paragraph shall not apply. Comment: The proposal is consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan. The density does not exceed eight dwellings per acre. U-121 King County, when evaluating rezone requests for increases in density, shall notify adjacent cities, special purpose districts and local providers of urban utility services and should work with these service providers on issues raised by the proposal. Comment: DDES notified the City of Renton and the city has responded to this request through a series of correspondence (Attachment 5 & 6). Road improvement standards of King County that will be used to build out this plat would seem the only issue of concern raised by the City. U-122 King County supports increases in urban residential density through a rezone or a proposal to increase density through the density transfer or density incentive programs when the proposal will help resolve traffic, sewer, water, parks or open space deficiencies in the immediate neighborhood. Comment: The development will provide extensions of sewer and a pump station with the ability to serve a 37 acre area providing future opportunity for sewer hook-up by other nearby property owners. 9 LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell An east west connection between 156th Ave. SE and 160th Ave. SE will be provided serving the neighborhood with an alternative neighborhood access connection. 156th Ave SE will be improved with a southbound left tum lane onto SE 136'" Street. Additionally, the following table displays the road improvements which would be provided under the R-6 proposal and R-4 Alternative. SE 136TH ST. SE 136TH ST SE 136TH ST 160TH AVE. SE New Right-of Way Right-of Way Right-of Way Improvements Improvements 8 Foot Curb, Gutter, & Curb, &Gutter Shoulder Sidewalks (north side) Improvement Rezone & Plat 1,250 feet 1,250 feet 625 feet 800 feet 70 Lots East -59 Lots 625 feet 625 feet 800 feet West -11 Lots 625 feet 625 feet 625 feet 0 Alternative R-4 625 feet* 0 0 0 Plat -44 Lots * The applicant is not proposing dedication of right-of-way under the R-4 Alternative, however DDES would recommend dedication. 160TH A VE. SE Right-of Way Improvements Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalks 0 0 0 800 feet As shown, more improvements under the rezone w/70 Jot plat will be provided than with the alternative R-4 plat proposal. Proportional dedication per lot and proportional improvements to streets abutting calculates as follows: RIGHT-OF-CURB, GUTTER, CURB & GUTTER WAY SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS DEDICATION IMPROVEMENTS PER LOT PER LOT PER LOT (North Side of street) Rezone & Plat 18 linear feet 18 linear feet 9 linear feet R-6 w/70 Lot (SE 136'" St.) Alternative R-4 14 linear feet * 18 linear feet 0 46 Lot Plat '160'" Ave. SE) * The applicant is not proposing dedication of right-of-way under the R-4 Alternative, however DDES would be recommendiog dedication for SE 136" St. between 158" Ave. SE and 160" Ave. SE. 8-FOOT SHOULDER IMPROVEMENTS PER LOT 11 linear feet 0 The above table shows that 4 lineal feet of additional right-of-way per lot would be dedicated and 11 lineal feet of additional shoulder improvements would be built per lot under the rezone w/70 lot plat than the 46 lot plat. M. CRITERIA FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPROVAL: 1. KCC 21 A.44.060 Zone reclassification. A zone reclassification shall be granted only if the applicant demonstrates. that the proposal complies with the criteria for approval specified in KCC 20.24.180 and 20.24.190 and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and applicable community and functional plans. Comment: See Section L above for a discussion of applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies and the Analysis Section of this report below. 2. KCC 20.24.180 Examiner findings. When the examiner renders a decision or recommendation, he or she shall make and enter findings of fact and conclusions from the record which support the decision and the findings and conclusions shall set forth and demonstrate the manner in which the decision or recommendation is consistent with, carries 10 '' L01TY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell out and helps implement applicable state laws and regulations and the regulations, policies, objectives and goals of the comprehensive plan, subarea or community plans, the zoning code, the land segregation code and other official laws, policies and objectives of King County, and that the recommendation or decision will not be unreasonably incompatible with or detrimental to affected properties and the general public. 3. KCC 20.24.190 Additional examiner findings -reclassifications and shoreline redesignations. When the examiner issues a recommendation regarding an application for a reclassification of property or for a shoreline environment redesignation, the recommendation shall include additional findings that support the conclusion that at least one of the following circumstances applies: A. The property is potentially zoned for the reclassification being requested and conditions have been met that indicate the reclassification is appropriate; B. An adopted subarea plan or area zoning specifies that the property shall be subsequently considered through an individual reclassification application; C. Where a subarea plan has been adopted but subsequent area zoning has not been adopted, that the proposed reclassification or shoreline redesignation is consistent with the adopted subarea plan; or D. The applicant has demonstrated with substantial evidence that: 1. Since the last previous area zoning or shoreline environment designation of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other conditions or circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone substantial and material change not anticipated or contemplated in the subarea plan or area zoning; 2. The impacts from the changed conditions or circumstances affect the subject property in a manner and to a degree different than other properties in the vicinity such that area rezoning or redesignation is not appropriate; For the purposes of this subsection, "changed conditions or circumstances" does not include actions taken by the current or former property owners to facilitate a more intense development of the property including but not limited to changing tax limitations, adjusting property lines, extending services, or changing property ownership; 3. For proposals to increase rural residential density, that the proposal meets the criteria in Comprehensive Plan policies R-205 through R-209; 4. For proposals to increase urban residential density, that the proposal meets the criteria in Comprehensive Plan policies U-118 through U-123; and 5. The requested reclassification or redesignation is in the public interest. (Ord. 14047 § 12, 2001: Ord. 4461 § 10, 1979). Comment: KCC 2 lA.24.190 (A), (B), and (C) do not apply to the subject rezone application. The relevant criterion under the additional Examiner Finding is KCC 20.24.190 (D). Prior to the adoption of the 1995 KC Comprehensive Plan and Area Zoning, the property was zoned SR-15,000 which was an urban zone designation that allowed development of property into lots 15,000 square feet in size and allowed/assumed on site septic/drainfields would be provided for the disposal of sewage for new development. With adoption of the 1994 Comprehensive Plan, and 1995 Area Zoning conversion process, the property was rezoned from SR-15000 to R-4. This R-4 zone continued to permit urban residential development on septic/drainfield systems in the Service Planning Area provided that dry sewers would be installed & a future service agreement were signed. Now under the 2000 Comprehensive Plan and Ord.# 14049, both effective as of March 12, 2001, all new residential development in the urban area must be served by sewer. Providing sewer to this and other properties in the immediate area will require a sewage pump station to facilitate new residential development at either R-4 or R-6 zoning density. As a result, development of the subject property and a pump station will help to make possible new homes on other properties nearby. Additionally, since the last area zoning, the City of Renton annexed and zoned the developing plat of Maplewood Estates for R-5 and R-8, This plat is served by a sewer extension. The plat contains many smaller lots of approximately 4,500 square feet. Subsequently, the rezone to R-8 for the Highland Estates plat of60 lots was approved by King County. 11 . ' N. PLAT STATUTES/CODES: L01TY401 and L01P0016 Evendell I. If approved with the recommended conditions in this report, the proposed development will comply with the requirements of the County and State Platting Codes and Statutes, and the lots in the proposed subdivision will comply with the minimum dimensional requirements of the zone district. 2. King County Road Standards Section 1.03 -Responsibility to Provide Roadway Improvements: A. Any land development which will impact the service level, safety, or operational efficiency of serving roads or is required by other County code or ordinance to improve such roads shall improve those roads in accordance with these Standards. The extent of off-site improvements to serving roads shall be based on an assessment of the impacts of the proposed land development by the Reviewing Agency ... 3. RCW 58.17.110 Approval or disapproval of subdivision and dedication-Factors to be considered-Conditions for approval-Finding-Release from damages. (!) The city, town, or county legislative body shall inquire into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of the subdivision and dedication. It shall determine: a) If appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school; and (b) whether the public interest will be served by the subdivision and dedication. (2) A proposed subdivision and dedication shall not be approved unless the city, town, or county legislative body makes written findings that: (a) Appropriate provisions are made for the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds and all other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school; and (b) the public use and interest will be served by the platting of such subdivision and dedication. If it finds that the proposed subdivision and dedication make such appropriate provisions and that the public use and interest will be served, then the legislative body shall approve the proposed subdivision and dedication ... 4. KCC20.24.195 Additional examiner findings -preliminary plats. When the examiner makes a decision regarding an application for a proposed preliminary plat, the decision shall include additional findings as to whether: A. Appropriate provisions are made for the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds and all other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning . features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school; and B. The public use and interest will be served by the platting of such subdivision and dedication. (Ord. 12196 § 38, 1996: Ord. 9544 § 16, 1990). 12 L01TY401 and L01P0016 Evendell 0. ANALYSIS/ CONCLUSIONS: I. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C, the responsible official of the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) issued a threshold determination - mitigated determination of non-significance (MONS) for the proposed request on December 23, 2002. This determination was based on the review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent documents, resulting in the conclusion that with implementation of mitigation, the proposal would not cause probable significant adverse impacts on the environment. Rezone 2. The proposal is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policy U-114. The proposed rezone would allow the planned density of5.6 dwellings per acre on site. This density is appropriate for the site, the ultimate build out of the neighborhood at R-4 density or higher has not occurred and many "infilling" opportunities exist within the neighborhood. 3. The rezone &.subdivision will be compatible with the character and scale of the other development per Policy U-119. It is recognized that most surrounding properties have not developed to their highest potential use and density. Nearby properties until recently did not have all urban services available (such as sewer) and therefore these properties have developed at only lower densities (generally 1/2 acre lots and greater). Comprehensive Plan Policy U-119 requires that urban area density increases shall not be approved through the rezone process unless "the development will be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhood". The County Council reclassified the neighborhood area surrounding and Evendell to R-4 in 1995, thus imposing as a necessary premise that urban density residential development at the R-4 classification is to be deemed compatible. With respect to further increasing densities to R-6, no incompatibility issues exist directly north, east and south of the east half of the plat as future urban densities are currently in the planning stages. South of the west half, existing residential development at lower densities presents some potential for conflict. This conflict is mitigated, however, by the decision to retain the existing house on a large 26,000-sq. ft. parcel, the location of the drainage/recreation tract and the street design, which will provide neighborhood circulation opportunities between Evendell and parcels west. 4. Potential adverse impacts to environmentally sensitive areas on site and environmental constraints in the vicinity will be adequately mitigated through the King County Code and SEPA. 5. Per Policy U-120, King County has notified the City of Renton and other local agencies of the rezone request and plat. The City concurs that the density proposed is consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan for this Potential Annexation Area. The density does not exceed six dwellings per acre. The City did express concern with the road improvement standards to be used. At this time an interlocal agreement has not been signed between the two jurisdictions by which King County would alternatively recognize City of Renton standards for street improvements. 6. Comprehensive Plan Policy U-121 supports "increases in urban residential density through a rezone ... when the proposal will help resolve traffic, sewer, water, parks or open space deficiencies in the immediate neighborhood". When new neighborhood infrastructure is made feasible by the additional density requested within a rezone, the potential infrastructure benefits to be derived from the density increase are to be viewed as a supporting rationale for granting the rezone request. In the instant situation, the Evendell application will provide 13 LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell neighborhood infrastructure benefits in the form of right-of-way dedication; and road improvements on 156"' Avenue Southeast, Southeast 136"' Street and 160"' Avenue Southeast. The SE 136"' St. east-west connection between 156"' Ave. SE and 160"' Ave. SE is an important connection, providing circulation needed to serve the neighborhood in the future. Currently the only east west access between 156"' Ave. SE and 160"' Ave. SE is via SE 128"' St. approximately 2,500 feet to the north and SE 144"' St. approximately 1,900 feet south of this plat. DDES and DOT staff do not anticipate others outside of the neighborhood will use the new connection as a cut through route due to the signal and tum lanes at the intersection of SE 128"' St.. and 156"' Ave. SE. Neighborhood circulation is important in providing access for neighbor to neighbor trips, service vehicles, emergency vehicles, school bus routes, and school walking routes without using the arterial road system or long routes. SE 128th St is designated as a principal arterial. Per the King County Road Standards, Section 2.02, the function of a principal arterial is: "Inter-community highways connecting largest community centers and facilities." The function is not to provide a connection between neighborhoods. Section 2.03 of the King County Road Standards describes the function of several Residential Access Streets to provide circulation within neighborhoods. Arterial routes should be preserved to serve the longer distance trips between communities. Given recent rulings of the examiner relative to providing neighborhood circulation within neighborhoods (see L99P3013), it is unlikely that another east-west connection would be built along this corridor as a condition of a future plat. Further, without the rezone and the 70-lot plat approval, this connection will unlikely ever be built unless the county chooses to make it a priority as part of the capital improvement program. The applicant will extend the potential sewer service area to encompass approximately 37 acres north and east of the plat with construct a sewer lift station. These are significant infrastructure improvements that benefit the neighborhood as it converts to urban densities, the costs of which are only feasible for the applicant with the increased density contemplated by the rezone request. Thus, the considerations which underlie policy U-121 apply to this proposal. 7. The reclassification of this property to R-6 will facilitate development that will be reasonably compatible with other nearby development and future development. The rezone will not be detrimental to affected properties and the general public in conformance with KCC 20.24.180. 8. Under the provisions ofKCC 20.24.190 (D), additional examiner findings, the applicant has sufficiently demonstrated changed circumstances effecting the site to conclude the reclassification is appropriate and the applicant has demonstrated that the requested reclassification of the subject parcel is in the public interest. Among the circumstances that have changed since the 1995 area-wide zoning is the requirement for sewer service to all urban development. Also, since 1995 is urban level of development taking place in the neighborhood at Maplewood, Highland Estates and other nearby proposed plats with densities greater than 4 dwellings per acre. Further, new areas to the west are now zoned R- 8 within the City of Renton and Unincorporated King County. A further changed circumstance is the proximity of sewer service in the area. These changed circumstances affect the Evendell property in a manner and degree different from other properties in the vicinity due to Evendell's location adjoining SE 136"' St. and the needed infrastructure on 136'h St. (sewer and road improvements). The sewer and road improvements for this rezone/plat are necessary to make this first stage of urban conversion successful, and will provide an infrastructure foundation for further development of other properties consistent with the R-4 designation. 14 ' ' LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell 9. The subject subdivision wilJ comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan and will comply with the requirements of the Subdivision and Zoning Codes and other official land use controls of King County, based on the recommendation below conditions for final plat approval. P. RECOMMENDATIONS: REZONE Approve zone reclassification of the property from R-4 to R-6, subject to the folJowing: Post-effective Conditions PLAT I. SE 136'" Street from 156'" Ave SE to the west Evendell plat boundary shall be improved to the urban neighborhood collector standard; EXCEPT that no sidewalk construction is required on the north side. Twenty-six feet of additional right-of-way shall be dedicated for this improvement. An additional 25-foot right-of-way radius shall also be dedicated at the southeast comer of 156th Ave SE and SE 136th St. 2. The west side 160th Ave SE abutting the subject property shall be improved with an 8-foot paved shoulder. 3. The Applicant shall revise the channelization proposed with the off-site improvements currently being constructed in conjunction with the plat of Highland Estates (LOOP0009). These modifications to the channelization shall incorporate a revision of the current proposed painted 'island' to a southbound left tum lane with at least 60 feet of storage for left turning vehicles to (a) encourage the use of 156th Avenue SE in lieu of 158th Avenue SE and 160th Avenue SE, and (b) mitigate the potential deficient condition that would from southbound left turning vehicles to make legal southbound left turns from the southbound through lane, or, use the painted island as a deceleration and refuge area while waiting for gaps in northbound traffic. Channelization and illumination plans must be submitted to King County Traffic Engineering Section for review and approval of the tum lane channelization. Grant preliminary approval of the subject subdivision, received August 29, 2002, subject to the following conditions of final approval: 1. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19 of the King County Code. 2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plat a dedication which includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952. 3. The plat shall comply with the base density (and minimum density) requirements of ' the R-6 zone classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-6 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, whichever is larger, except that minor revisions to the plat which do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. 15 LOITY401 and LOIP00!6 Evendell 4. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended (1993 KCRS). 5. A Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) shall be completed to except out that portion of the rezone area on the far west that is not part of the Evendell plat prior to final plat. 6. The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow standards of Chapter 17.08 of the King County Code. Joint Use Development Tract Has shown on the plat (Attachment 2) will provide access to Lots 28 and 29. Additionally, it is a future emergency vehicle access tract to and from l 60tl' Ave. SE, which the applicant proposes to create in response to concerns raised by the City of Renton. The applicant shall include proposed protocols for the construction and maintenance of Tract H, plus any related plat notes, with its engineering plans submittal meeting the following standards: The emergency vehicle access to 1601h Ave. SE shall have a minimum driving surface width of 20 feet, with an all-weather surface capable of supporting 25 tons. Any locking device shall be approved by the Renton Fire Department (KCFD # 25). Chains, cable or bollards will not be permitted. The gate shall be located at least 50 feet from 160th Ave. SE to allow space for fire apparatus to stop while opening the gate or to wait before entering the public roadway. If these conditions are not met any future residence constructed on Lots 28, 29 and 30 will have to be sprinklered NFPA 13D. These conditions must be satisfied, unless an alternative is approved by the King County Fire Protection Engineer and Renton Fire Department (KCFD # 25) 7. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location oflots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and applicable updates adopted by King County. DDES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DDES Engineering Review, shall be shown on the engineering plans. c. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings # on file with DDES and/or the King County Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for individual lot infiltration systems, the systems·shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with plans on file." d. The stormwater detention design shall comply with the Level 2 Flow Control requirements per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). 16 LOITY401 and LOIPOOJ6 Evendell e. The storm water control facility shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King County unless portions of the drainage tract are used for required recreation space in accordance with KCC 21A.14.180. · 8. Drainage adjustment L02V0024 is approved for this project. All conditions of approval for this adjustment shall be met upon submittal of the engineering plans. See Attachment 9. 9. A drainage easement for the conveyance from the Tract N drainage facility to l 56'h Ave SE shall be provided upon engineering plan submittal. 10. The following road improvements are required to be constructed according to the 1993 King County Road Standards(KCRS): a. The internal access road from SE 136"' St. to the beginning of the internal loop road shall be improved to the urban subcollector standard. b. The internal loop road shall be improved to the urban subaccess road standard with sidewalks on the outside frontage of the loop road. c. SE 136"' St. FRONTAGE/OFFSITE--The following SE 136"' St. improvement shall be designed in general conformance with the Preliminary Road Improvement Plan received 3/26/2002: The frontage from 158"' Ave NE to 160"' Ave NE shall be improved to the urban one-half street standard. Eighteen feet of additional right-of way shall be dedicated for this improvement. SE 136'" St. frontage from the west plat boundary to 158'h Ave NE shall be improved to the urban neighborhood collector standard; EXCEPT that no sidewalk construction is required on the north side. Twenty feet of additional right-of-way shall be dedicated for this improvement. SE 136"' St. offsite from 156"' Ave SE to the west plat boundary shall be improved to the urban neighborhood collector standard; EXCEPT that no sidewalk construction is required on the north side. Twenty-six feet of additional right-of- way shall be provided for this improvement. An additional 25-foot right-of-way radius is required at the southeast comer of 156"' Ave SE and SE 136"' St. d. 160"' Ave SE FRONTAGE: The 160" Ave SE frontage shall be improved with an 8-foot paved shoulder on the west side. Adequate provisions for road drainage shall be provided. e. Tracts A,C,F,G,H, and I shall be improved to the joint use driveway standard per Section 3.01 of the KCRS. Tract A shall include an easement to King County for the maintenance of the Tract N drainage facility. Tract A shall be owned and maintained by the owners of Lots I and 2. f. Tracts B, D and E shall be improved to the private access tract standard per Section 2.09 of the KCRS. g. Per Rezone condition #3, the Applicant shall revise the channelization proposed with the off-site improvements currently being constructed in conjunction with the plat of Highland Estates (LOOP0009). These modifications to the channelization shall incorporate a revision of the current proposed painted 'island' to a southbound left tum lane with at least 60 feet of storage for left turning vehicles to (a) encourage the use of 156th Avenue SE in lieu of 158th Avenue SE and 160th Avenue SE, and (b) mitigate the potential deficient condition that would from southbound left turning vehicles to make legal southbound left turns from the southbound through lane, or, use the painted island as a deceleration and refuge area while waiting for gaps in northbound traffic. 17 LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell Channelization and illumination plans must be submitted to King County Traffic Engineering Section for review and approval of the tum lane channelization. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered according to the variance provisions in Section 1.08 of the KCRS. 11. There shall be no direct vehicular access to or from 160th Ave. SE from those lots, which abut this street. A note to this effect shall appear on the engineering plans and final plat. 12. Off-site access to the subdivision shall be over a full-width, dedicated and improved road that has been accepted by King County for maintenance. If the proposed access road has not been accepted by King County at the time of recording, then said road shall be fully bonded by the applicant of this subdivision. 13. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final plat recording. 14. The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by the applicable fee ordinance. The applicant has the option to either: (I) pay the MPS fee at final plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building permit application. 15. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the Sensitive Areas Code as outlined in KCC 21 A.24. Preliminary plat review has identified the following specific requirements that apply to this project. All other applicable requirements from KCC 2 lA.24 shall also be addressed by the applicant. a. This site contains a Class 2 wetland. The majority of the wetland will be protected from alteration during and after construction, with a 50-foot wide buffer around the wetland boundary. An additional 15-foot building setback is required beyond the edge of the buffer. b. A maximum of200 square feet of wetland will be filled for con·struction of SE 136th Street. Mitigation shall consist of at least 400 square feet of wetland enhancement to degraded portions of the existing wetland. c. Road improvements for SE 136th Street and 160th Avenue SE will eliminate 6,989 square feet of wetland buffer. Mitigation shall consist of providing at least an equivalent amount of additional buffer in the northeast portion of the site. Reduced impact will result in reduced mitigation. d. The proposed sewer main within the SE 136th Street right-of-way will intrude into the wetland buffer along with the road improvements. In order to protect wetland hydrology: (1) the sewer line shall be installed during the dry season (June through September), and (2) the design shall incorporate the use of pipe bed dams ofbentonite or other material at intervals to preclude draining possible subsurface water flows through the gravel pipe bedding. e. Downstream drainage improvements to existing culverts and stormwater conveyances required through the SEPA MDNS shall cause no adverse alteration to existing wetlands or streams in the vicinity of the drainage improvements. 18 LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell f. Critical Areas staff shall review engineering plans for the plat and sewer main for conformance with these requirements. 16. The following note shall be shown on the final engineering plan and recorded plat: RESTRICTIONS FOR SENSITIVE AREA TRACTS AND SENSITIVE AREAS AND BUFFERS Dedication of a sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. This interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the land subject to the tract/sensitive area and buffer the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by King County, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. The vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without approval in writing from the King County· Department of Development and Environmental Services or its successor agency, unless otherwise provided by law. The common boundary between the tract/sensitive area and buffer and the area of development activity must be marked or otherwise flagged to the satisfaction of King County prior to any clearing, grading, building construction or other development activity on a lot subject to the sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer. The required marking or flagging shall remain in place until all development proposal activities in the vicinity of the sensitive area are completed. No building foundations are allowed beyond the required 15-foot building setback line, unless otherwise provided by law. 17. Suitable recreation space shall be provided consistent with the requirements KCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21A.14.190 in providing sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic table[s], benches, etc .. a. A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) shall be submitted for review and approval by DOES and King County Parks prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the engineering plans. This plan shall comply with Ordinance # 14045. b. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. 18. A homeowners' association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction ofDDES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation, open space and/or sensitive area tract(s). 19. Street trees shall be included in the design of all road improvements, and shall comply with Section 5.03 of the KCRS and KCC 21A.16.050: a. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. b. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King 19 LOJTY401 andLOIPOOJ6 Evendell County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. c. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. d. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. e. The species of trees shall be approved by DDES if located within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. f. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by DDES prior to engineering plan approval. g. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DDES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. A landscape inspection fee shall also be submitted prior to plat recording. The inspection fee is subject to change based on current County fees. 20. The following have been established by SEP A as necessary requirements to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of this development. The applicants shall demonstrate compliance with these items prior to final approval. a. East Drainage Basin: The 160th Ave SE downstream conveyance system shall be upgraded to provide for the I 00-year storm capacity. Downstream driveway culverts/ditches and a cross-culvert under 160th Ave. SE shall be improved as follows: Culverts P-117 and P-116 on the west side of 160'" Ave. SE, cross-culvert P-115, and culverts P-114 and P-113 on the east side of 160'" Ave. SE shall be improved as needed. The culvert designations are according to the Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis by Haozous Engineering dated August 26, 2002. To address a related localized flooding condition, bank and channel stabilization are also required in the unopened right-of-way for 162nd Ave. SE, in the vicinity of the easterly line of Lot 12, Rich Lea Crest (address 16046 SE 142nd Street). It is estimated that stabilizing and re-grading approximately 50 to 100 feet of channel, east of 16046 SE 142nd Street, will be adequate to resolve flooding that has occurred in the past location. The culverts and channel described are located from the south site boundary to a distance of approximately 1,700 feet downstream. Level 2 Flow Control design is required for the proposed stormwater detention facility. A factor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. 20 b. West Drainage Basin: L01TY401 and L01P0016 Evendell The stormwater detention facilities shall be designed to the Level 3 Flow Control Standard as described in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). As an option, Level 2 Flow Control with downstream improvements can be proposed according to Core Requirement 2 of the KCSWDM. The minimum Flow Control Standard shall be Level 2. A factor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: I. The subdivision shall conform to KCC 16.82 relating to grading on private property. 2. Development of the subject property may require registration with the Washington State Department of Licensing, Real Estate Division. 3. Preliminary approval of this application does not limit the applicant's responsibility to obtain any required permit or license from the State or other regulatory body. This may include, but is not limited to the following: a. Forest Practice Permit from the Washington State Dept. of Natural Resources. b. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit from WSDOE. c. Water Quality Modification Permit from WSDOE. d. Water Quality Certification (401) Permit from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers REPORT ATTACHMENTS: I. Map of Rezone from R-4 to R-6 2. R-6 -70 Lot Preliminary Plat 3. R-4 -Alternative 46 Lot Plat 4. Density Calculations For R-6 Plat 5. City of Renton January 20, 2003 Letter 6. City of Renton June 15, 2001 Letter 7. Certificate of Water Availability, May 30, 2001 8. School Information, July 12, 2001 9. SWM Adjustment Approval, L02V0024 TRANSMITTED TO PARTIES LISTED HEREAFTER: 4 CREEKS UAC, ATTN: CLAUDIA DONNELLY PO BOX 3501 RENTON, WA 98056 BORBA, GREG, CURRENT PLANNING SUPERVISOR DOES /LUSD MS: OAK -DE-0100 BRYANT, RONDA, 15406 SE 136TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 CARLSON, MARILYN, 13616 156TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 CASEY, LAURA, WETLAND REVIEW DOES/ SDSS MS: OAK-DE-0100 CITY OF RENTON, ATTN: REBECCA LIND 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 CLAUSSEN,KIM, SR. PLAT PLANNER DOES/ CPLN MS: OAK-DE -0100 COFFIN, RONALD, 16015 SE 135TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059-6828 DAY, SHIRLEY, 14412 167TH PLACE SE RENTON, WA 98059 DORST AD, ROGER, EVERGREEN EAST REAL TY PO BOX 375 REDMOND, WA 98073 HANSON, STEPHEN & YVONNE, 15611 SE 138TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 HARBOUR HOMES, KURT WILSON 1010 S. 336TH ST., SUITE #305 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 HAOZOUS ENGINEERING, INC, ATTN: ROBERT DARROW 15428 -45TH CT MUKILTEO WA 98275 HEMNES, VALERIE, 15627 SE 139TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98058 HIGH, VICTOR& GWENDOLYN, 13405 158TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 HILL, EDWARD, JUNE & KRISTY, 13527 -156TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 HILTON, EDWARD & NANCY, 13414 -158TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 HUGHES, KURT, 15646 SE 138TH,PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 JAQUES, FRED AND HELGA, 13114158TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 JOHNSTON, LEONARD J., 16016 SE 135TH RENTON, WA 98059 KC EXECUTIVE HORSE COUNCIL, ELEANOR MOON 12230 NE 61 sr KIRKLAND, WA 98033 21 L01TY401 and L01P0016 Evendell KC HEARING EXAMINERS OFFICE , ATTN: CHERYLE PACKARD MS: BOC-CC -0850 KEZELE, DON, 15657 SE 137TH PLACE RENTON WA 98059 LANGLEY, KRISTEN, LAND USE TRAFFIC DOES I CPLN MS: OAK-DE-0100 LEE, JOANN, 13802 160TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 LEX, TIM & GINA, 13116 158TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 LYMAN, STEVE, 14505 -160TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 MARCY, JERRY, POST OFFICE BOX 575 SEATTLE, WA 98111 MARTIN, FRED & GLORIA, 13019 160TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 MOKIN, BILL, 14404 162ND AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 MUHICH, STEVEN & PERI, 13420 160TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 NYBLOM, DAVE, 13606 158TH A VE SE RENTON, WA 98059 NIPERT, SALLY, 14004 156TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 NOTT, FLORENCE, 15915 SE 134TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 OLIPHANT, RICHARD & ANITA, 16519 SE 145TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 PETRIE, DAVE, 811 SOUTH 273RD COURT DES MOINES, WA 98198 PLATT, DA YID, 510 PANORAMIC DRIVE CAMANO ISLAND, WA 98282 ROGERS, CAROL, CURRENT PLANNING SECTION ODES I CPLN MS: OAK-DE-0100 ROLLINGER, MARSHA, 15646 SE 138TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 ROMANO, MICHAEL, CENTURIAN DEVEL. SERVICES 22617 8TH DR SE BOTHELL, WA 98021 SCHARER, KAREN, PROJECT MANAGER MS: OAK-DE-0100 DDES/CPLN SCHOLES, GENEVA, 12924 158TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 SCHUSTER, CURTIS G, JOHN L SCOTT REAL ESTATE 12505 BEL-RED RD, STE 212 BELLEVUE WA 98005 SCOBY, CHARLES & VIOLA, 13112 158TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059-8531 SIDEBOTHAM, KAREN & JEFFREY, 13004 158TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 SLATON, DANIEL B., 15315 SE 133RD COURT RENTON, WA 98059 STANSBURY, HOWARD, US LAND DEVL. ASSOC/CENTURION 22617 8TH DR SE BOTHELL, WA 98021 STREIT, PEGGY, 13512 160TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 THORBECK, PENNY, 15650 SE 138TH PL RENTON, WA 98059 WA ST.ECOLOGY DEPT I WQSW UNIT, ATTN: LINDA MATLOCK PO BOX 47696 . OLYMPIA WA 98504-7696 WATLER, DA YID, 15635 SE 138TH PL. RENTON, WA 98059 WEST, LARRY, GEO REVIEW DDES/SDSS MS: OAK-DE-0100 WHITTAKER, BRUCE, PRELIMINARY REVIEW ENGINEER DOES I ERS MS: OAK-DE-0100 WILMOT, MR. & MRS., 13900 160TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 WOLBERG, ALVIN, 16021 SE 136TH STREET RENTON, WA 98059 ZEEK, HAROLD & ELEANOR, 16621 SE 145TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 22 JS"'JMHU)III •=em ' I I • JI 1llil H!ii ll ~ . , i I • .. • ·11 ,1. I, i ! ' . i,11 1: lll!li j, i ., I . · I llli I lll !11 1 1 1 11 111 i1 i , , 11,11111 i 1 1 1 11111111, 1 m1 1 .iii 1. m; I I. !i 1ili1 i!illl i II I I! ' 1 . ~1 I 11 !l1il1l1li I i f · I I! 1 ~ J . I I~ f II I~ 11, I 11111, 1·,111 II ! I I '111' 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ·1 I I II ~ I 1!•··1 I I I . ! • I. • l . 1 , ,Uh I 1 • ,1 · . I, ~ t! I.. ii i 11, I: I'~ I , I 11111 lll1 '1 111 1 ,II . •'. . I 11! I~ 11111 i~ I!!' !I .. . .i i I , ,fB,. .·,w,,-' ATIACHMEN-T-·--i ..... _, _____ ····-__ ,,_, .1 OF 1- . PAGE PAGE :.=====~---_-_ -_ -_ ...:.._ -_ -_ -_--:--------:-----------····-·-·········· . ATTACHMENT 2 ······--···· .. -····· .. ···· . -···' ! 6r=: I PAGE --PA,_G_E_ -·----'------,,-- I ; .--, .I. ... / , ,, \ " , 1su•q1nos ana~,v-' "19"1 --·--· '\lit . ' 1 ~ ,g '1 ,,, ,·:..:···· .~1 .• : .r I ... -:;:'~!' ,•t t''l' l ' ' IJ•I . .i·}i' ~!,JW. i i • 1llil n!l! I I ! I I ATIACHMENT I PAGE OF-~=-=--PAGE , l I --•n,-, .~ .. -~-·~"' ...... ,~--·-~; l(;ng Coun1y Department of De-tcp.1c1I and Enwonmental ~ Lard Use Ser,;ces ClMsion 900 OakeerHe Avenue SW Renton. WA 9805S-1219 (206) 296-6600 PLAT DENSITY AND DIMENSION CALCULATIONS PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION WORl<SHEET RELATING TO DENSITY AND DIMENSIONS n A great many ordinances play a ro6e in the creation of a subdrv,sion 'Nithin King County. Determining the aUowable density, maaimclm dl!ns,ty, minimum dens;ty." and loC widd'I on a piece of property can be confusing. This worksheet will assist you In conedty ~ specific p<>fticln$ cf the code and will be used to delermine If a proposed plat Of $Oft pial me.ts !he density ---ol lhe King County Zonmg Code (Tode 21A). --lo prwared to assist appticants, and does not replace comp6iance with adopted local. $l:ale and federal Laws. LD1 · Poo 16 Preapplication confe..ences are recornoe oded. These cordefences hefp lo clarity issues an4:' allS'Wef questions. They may save you boch time and money by eliminating deta)IS resuling from requests fOf additional infonnatk>n and revbions. You may call (206) 296-6640 to find out 1,()11# to arrar,ge for a PfeapP'icatton confel'ence. DATE: NAME OF Pl.AT: EYENPEI I FlLE NO.: LP1f>0016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Urban resideo1iaV4-J 2 Units pee Aae ZONING: 8-:§ f Pmrnsn1) COMMUNITY OR SUBAREA PLAN: Hr as#c If fflOfe than one Comprehensive P\an Land Use~ or zone' clas.sfflcatlon exisb for the property, show the boundary bet-Neer, the land uses Of lorle$ and the area 'Mthin each on the preliminary plat map. If a single loC is dMded by a zone-boundary, l1an5le,ring den:s,lty ac,055 zones on thal lot may be permitted $lJb;ect to the pr~ of KCC 21A.12.200. I. 5ffl! AcN QC CC 21A Qfi 1172)· Site area (in square feet) is the gross horizontal area of the p,o;ect site, l!e» submet"ged lands as defined by K.C.C. 2 IA.06.1265, and ffl_areas whieh are required to be dedicated ~ the pefimeter of a pro,ect site fOf public: rihgts-of-Wit'f. ____ o~---~e feet in subffierged land (any land bebN' the ordinary high water marlc • see K.C.C. 21 A.06.825.) + __ ~2_4,~80_7 ___ square feet in petknetef righb-ol-way which will be required to be dedk:ated (area 30 feet from center line of road) 24,807 Total Calculation: 24.807 Total submergec:t lands and rights-of-way 0 f-'7 ,, .. .. I,. / .. /·• c.:- 1-. /'. 541,432 Sile area in square feet NOTE: To continue calc:ulalk>ns. convert site area in square feet lO acres by dividing by 43,560 ___ 1_2._43_ Sile area in acres II. Base Densily (K.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.040 lab!,:s): The base density is delern,;, ,ed by the zone designalion(s) fof the lot. 25-Mar-02 Page 1 of4 6 du/ace ATTACHMENT t _ _,_ __ --,,~I.,,.· =--OF__,±*=" =- PAGE PAGE Ex. 3A,'-/ \. PLAT DENSITY AND DIMENSION CALCULATIONS Ill, Allt:!watm Dweffino Units and Roondin2 CK.CC 21A 12 070)· The base number of dweMing unb is~ t,v ~ the site aJea by lhe base densny in dwefNng units per acre (from K.C.C. 21A.12.030-.040~)- 12.43 site area in acres (see Section I.) X ___ 6c..._ __ base dfflslly (oee Section II.) aUowat>,e ~ng unib = 74.58 When cak:ulations resutt in a fraction. the fractSon _is rounded to the nearest whoie numbet" as follows: IV. · 1. Fractions ot .50 Of aba,,e shaU be rounded up; and 2. Fractions bebw .50 sha'I be rounded down. Beote:red On.site Bca:eatior $pa:rr (K C C 21 A 14 180)· This section must be completed onty If the proposal is a res,,dentlal de-oek,pment of moJe than four dwelling units In the UR ai'KI A zones. stand-ak>ne townhouses i':' the NB zone on p,operty designated Commerclal Qubkje of ~ter If fflOfe than lour units. or any mtxed use de.eloplne,1t it more than four units. Recreation space must be computed by muW~ng the recreatkln space requirement pet' unit type by the p,oposed number of such dwelling units (K.C.C. 21A.14. 180). NOTE: Ktng County has the discretion to accepl a fee In lieu of all or a portion of the required recreation _.,.per K.C.C. 21A.14.185. Apartments and townhouses devetoped at a density greater than eight untb pet' acre, and mixed use must provide · recreattona' space as foWows: 90 square feet X 130 square feet X 170 square feet X _____ proposed numbef of studK> and one bedroom unl ____________ _,o,.. _____ p,oposed numbef of t'M> bedroom units 0 -----~ number of three or moJe bedroom ui11t!i _____________ D 0 _ _____ Recreation Space Requirement Residential subdMsioos and townhouses ~ at a density of eight units Of less per acre must provide recreational space as fc:,,lkwi,'s: 390 square feet X ____ 7'-'0~proposed number ol units = 27300 Mobi~ home pant$ shall prCMC:ie recre~I space as folkiw's: 260 square feet X _____ pr~ numbef ol units = V. Net Bt tHdabh: Aom CK C C 21 A06 79D· This section is used tor computing rninlmum density and must be comP'eted only If the site is k>caled in the R-t through R-48 zones and desq\ated Urban·by the King County Compfehensive ?tan. The net boildabk! area Is the :site area (see Section I.) less the tolkJwing areas: + + + + + 0 ----''-----areas wilbln.a prQfOCt site which are required lo be dedk:ated fOf public rights-d-way In excess ol sbtty feet (60') ol width 76.130 sensltw areas and their buften. to the extent tt-.ey are required by King County to remain -------- 40.256 ---=='----areas required for abow ground stonnwatef control fadl.ties Inducting, but nol llmlted to .. rdention/~ l)Clf'm. bkJM1ation ~ and setbacks from such ponds and $Wales ---=='----areas requifed by King County to be dedicated or re5ef¥ed as on-site recreation areas. Deduct 13.650 area wtthin slonnwalef controt facility if requesting recreation space credit as allc:wri,ed by KCC 21 A. 14.180. (see Section IV.) 0 ___ ...;c ___ regional utHity corridors. and 0 -~----other areas, exduding sett>acb, required by King County to remain undeYek>ped 130.036 -~==--TCQI <edudions Calculation: 25-Mar-02 Page 2 of 4 541.451 Me area In square feet (see Section I.) 130.036 Total reductions 411 .415 net bulldable area in square feet NOTE: c~ site area in square feet lo acres by d~ng by 4.3.560 9.4-4 net bui~ area in acres 0 ATTACHMENT~-4"--_ --=~2..=--0F--,::-:4-==-PAGE PAGE \1 ' PlAT DENSITY AND DIMENSION CALCULATIONS VI. f#+ I n Urb;m Pni te,ltb;t C>eMay O( CC 21A 12 060) The minimum density requirement appije3 !2Qly: to the R--4 through R-.a ztlr'le$. Minimum density is detmnined by muttipfying the base density in <h,t,e4ling units pet'.acre (see Section II.) by the net buikiable area of the site in acres (see Section V.) and then muttiptying the resutting p,oduct by the minknum detlsity percentage h"om the K.C.C. 21A.12.030 tab'e. The mtnimum den$ity requirements may be pha$ed 04" waived by King County in certain cases. See K.C.C. 21A.12.060. . . Calculation: 6 base density In dU/ac (see Sectioo II. 9.44 net buikiable area In acres (see Section V.) ----'-56.67 X minimum density% set forth In K.C.C. 21A.12.030 Of as adjusled In Sec1Son VII. ------48=.1'-'7'-minimum dwelling unlb required VII. Woiro1YD Qmsity A,ijer;tmeots_tgr t:toderaJe Sko:s (KC C 21A 17_ o0n Residential d&t.elopmenb in the R--4. R-6 and A-a zones may modify the minimum deM.lty factOf in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 · based on the weighted .werage slope of the net buildable area of the site (see Sectk,n V.). To detennlnethe weighted average slope, a topographic s.urvey is 1equifed to cakulale the net bt.ikiabk area(s) withm each of the following sJope incremeob and then multiplying the nUmbef of square feet in each slope increment by the median sk>pe value of each slope increment as foMows:· _______ 7 0 sq. ft O. 5% slope increment X 2.5% median slop(!, value + 0 sq ll 5· 10~ slope inoementX 7.5% median slope vclue + 0 sq. fl 10-15% slope inoemen1X l2.5':'. madie.n slope value + 0 sq.ll.15·20~.slopeinaementX17.S•4medlans1opevalue + 0 sq. 11 20· 25~. slope maemen1X 22.S~; medie.n slope value + 0 sq.'ft 25-30!-'. slope inaemen1X 27.SX medien slope value + 0 sq. tt 30· 35% slope inoementX 32.SX median slope value + 0 sq. ft: 35 • 40% slope maemerrtX 37 S"'· median slope value -------~O_Total square feet innet~llfea ------'00 TOlal square feet adjusled ... slope Calculation: ___ ..:O~total square feet adjusted tor slope dMded by O total square feet In net buildable area ==· weighted average slope of net buildable area a % (Note: multiply by 100 to c~veft lo percent· round up to nearest who6e perc~) Use the table bebw' to detenntne the minimum density factor. This density is substituted tot" the minimum density factOf In K.C.C. 21 A.12.030 table when cak:ulating the mtntmum densfty as shown in Sedkin VI. of this wcwksheet. Weighted Awrage Sk)9e of Net Minimum Denstty Factor: ~ Areafs) of Site; 0% • less than 5% 85.00% 5% • k!ss than 15% 83%. less 1.5% tor each 1% of . In excess of 5% 15% • less than 40% 66%. less 2.0% for each 1% of In excess of 15% EXAMPLE CALCULATION FOR MINIMUM DENSITY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MODERATE SLOPES: -------sq. ft O. 5% skipe Increment X 2. 5% median slope value = + 10000 tQ. ft: 5. 10% slope inc:,emeniX7 5% medie.n slope value + 20000 sq.fl 10·15%slopeincremerrtX12.SY.medionsJopewlue + sq. ft 15-20% slope inc:,ementX 17.S'X medieri slope value + sq. ft: 20-25% slope inaementX 22.5% median slopevclue + SQ. fl 25 • 30% slope incrementX 27.S~. median slope value + SQ. n 30 • 35% slope inc,ementX 32.5% median slope value + sq. ft 35· 40% slope inaemerrtX 37.5% median s1opevelue -----~30.cOc.O=.O Total square feet in net buiklab6e area ___ _;3250=~ Total square leet ad!"""''"'"'°"" Calculation: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 2500 __ _,3250="-total square feet acfiu5led for sJope dMded bV tota, square feet In net buikiabte area 4 0-11 _...,_...,. ...... .._.... TACHMENT ============1~1:;:% % (Note:~ by 100 to cOfMeft to percent. round up to ~a,est wtde ~ . --...!--- Using the table aboYe, an 11 % wetghted avenge slope of ~ buildable area falls within the 5% • less than 15% range 3 Q F __ . _.4.i.;.· --- Wftk:h has a minimum density factor of 83%. ~ 1.5% for each 1 % of avetage slope In excess of 5%. Since 11 % >l1L66'>~-="--~-PAGE abow 5%, m"111ply6 llmeo 1.Swhlchwould equal 9%. Subcract9% hem 83% 10< an adjusied minimum densilylacto<. PAGE of 7~%. Thb repiaces the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21 A, 12.030 table. . , PLAT DENSITY AND DIMENSION CALCULATIONS VIII. HiPiDMHD Pedoo Units Alkzwrd rK CC 21A 12 010: 040)· This section should be compk!iled only If the proposal Includes applkation of res.kSential density incentives (K.C.C. 21A.34) or l1'an5ler of densitv credit (K.C.C. 21A.36 or 21A.S5). Maidmum density Is calculated by adding the bonus or bansfer units authorized to the base unils calculaled in Section Ill. of this '#Orksheet. The maidmum density permitted through resktential density incenttws Is 150 percent of the base density (see Section II.) of the undefMng Zoning of the de: elcpci.etlt or 200 percent of the base density for prop;,sab wilh 100 percent affor~ units. The maximum density permiQed through transler of density credit IS 150 percent of the base density (see Section 11.) of the underlying zoning of the de\elopment. ____ D_ base density in.dwe41ing.unlts per acre (see Section 11.) X 150% = 0 maximum density D ----· D,_maximum density In d\Nelling units per acre X 12.43 site area In acref------------=- maximum d'..wiling units alk,Ned utillzlng density Incentives (K.C.C. 21A.34) ___ .;Debase density in dwetUng units per acre (see Section 11.) X 200% 0 maximum density ___ .;Demaximum density In ct.vellilig units per acre X 12.43 site area In acr~·------------=-D maximum diNefflng units aUorwed utUlzk,g demity lnc:etJtiYes wtth 100% affordable units (K.C.C. 21A.34} ___ .;Debase density in d\Nelling units per acre (see Section II.) X 150% 0 maximum density ---,---'De maximum density In dweNlng units per acre X t 2.43 site area in acr~·------------=-D maximum <hrrte41ing units allowed utilizing density translers (K. C.C. 21 A.36 or 21 A.55) Calculation: -------=-0 base aMowat:>6e do#elling units cakulaled in Section Ill. + D boous uniOl ault<>rtzed by K.C.C. 21A.34 + 0 tran:sler WMb authorized by K.C.C. 21A.36 or 21A.55 ______ _c.o total doNel5il,g units (cannot exceed maxtmums calculated above) IX. Minimum Lot Area For Canstructioll: E,x:ept as prowled 1or nona:,nformances in Kee 21A.32: A. B. In the UR and R zones no cot'1$1ruction shall be permitted on a lot that contains an area of less than 2.500 square.feet or that does not compty with the applicabte minimum lot width, excepe for townhouse de. eloprnenb o, zero-k,t-Une subdMsions; and In the A. F. Of RA zones: 1. Construction shall not be permitted on a k>I containing. less than 5,000 square feet: and 2. Construction 5ha£I be limhed to one dv,,,eUing unit and residential acCes.sofY uses for lots containing 9reater than 5,000 square feet. but less than 12,500 square feet. (KCC 21A.12.100) X. Lot Width- 25-Ma<-02 Page 4 of 4 Lot widths shail be me~red by scaling a drde of the appijcable diameter within the boundaries of the lot iD ~ below. puMded that an access easement shall not be Included within the circle. (See KCC 21A.12.050). ATTACHMENT~4_,__~ it OF--=4-':-=:='-PAG E PAGE .. \: CITY OF-REN'EQN··_. · • .• _. Plaiutlng!Buildirig!Publit\V~ilcsD;;;;ar@dJt Gregg :Z:lmnierinanP.E:;·~~inl#lstrat~r··'. Janriary20; ioo3 .·· . Kareri Scharet, Prcip M~iige~ ' · ...• DOES-Larid Use Services Division·· . Attri_: Permi(Centet . .•.. , 900 Oakesdale Avemie SW .· Renton, WA 9805_5°1219 . . SUBJECT: . L01P0016 & L01TY401, EVENDELJ,.StJlJ~MSION AND REZONE· . . . . . . . ·. . . . . . · 'Dear Ms; Schimir, .·. · , . Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the rezone andformlil plat fo/t!ie ref~renced• · .. · development.) recognize ·.that this letter is coming to you past the published due date for t!itf . '.coinments. However; w,e would still request to put the attached comments into the record> · · I. ·. Utjlities: Water District#90 will provide water. The City of Renton will provide sewer. A sewer availability certificate has been i_ssued. An amendment to the sewer availability. certificate wiUallow_the parcel to the south to be included (in progress). · 2 .. · Transportation: The proposed development is within Renton's Potential Anne;ation area,. therefore we request that: · · ~ Right-of-way dedication along SE I 36'h Street abutting the development site conforms . with City of Renton standards (i.e. a minimum of20-feet ofpa,vtiment); Also, right-of- way dedication for the internal street system shall meet the City of Renton standards. ~ Street improveinents (roadway, pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks; streetlighting; etc.) · are required for the portion of the site abutting SE 136u. Street and abutting 160th Ave. · SE. . ·,. ~. The required street improvements along SE 1361!> Street, 160!)1 Avenue SE and the, internal street system shall be installed in accordance with City of Renton stan_dardsi. 'Thallk: you> · Siri~ere_ly, .· · · <.... .· · ,!J:ifl!!.!t!~ ····. Plannirig/Building/Public Works Dept . Lys Homiby .:Sandra MC)'cr. . Jcnhifcr·~enning ,\• :: ATTACHMENT·~ __.i::G:;,,..,_.':...• -- \ (}~ r:·.<···· .. PAGE PAGE \ # I ! 'I Jesse Tanner. Mayor June 15, 2001 · 1 CITY o_a_1~ RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.; Administrator .,r\. :~:,.:\ .. I~ .. ~,>,,:.,,: • .: •. :.~.:'.,_·~· .\ICITY_OF_RENTONIRENTON\CENTRAL\SYS2iDEPTSIPBPW\DMSION;S\UTIUTJE.SIWASTE.WTRldave · vat 1055 South Qrady Way, Renton, Washington 98055 ~ · ... ,_ ---L--~·-~-~,;., ~.:..:..._~ __ ._., ... · .. ;..,· ---· ---~··---. ,:.,,, '.I ' • I ® King County :ODES ; DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Wa 98055-1219 This certificatt. ,,,Q.rides the Seattle King County Department of Public Health and the Department of Development and Environmental Services V(ith information necessary to evaluate deyelopment proposals. · King County Certificate of Water Availability ' ' I Do not write in this box number D Building Permit D Short Subdivision 181 Preliminary Plat or PUD D Rezone or other _______ _ Applicant's name: U.S. Land Development Assoclates-Evendell Proposed use: Single Family Residences /75 lots) Location: Between 156th & 160th Ave SE. South of SE 136th Street /13 acres l name (attach map and legal description If necessary) ~,~---------~ Water purveyor information: 1. D a. Water will be provided by service connection only to an existing (size) water main that Is fronting the site. OR 181 b. Water service will require an improvement to the water system of: D (1) feet of water main to reach the site; and/or 181._(2) The construction of a distribution system on the site; and/or l!D{3) Other (describe) D.E. Required· offslte Improvements. Specific reg. will be determined In preliminary requirements meeting. 2. 181 a. The water system Is In conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan. OR D b. The water system Improvement Is not In conformance with a County approved.water comprehensive plan and will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. {This may cause a delay In Issuance of a permit or approval). 3. 181 a. The proposed project Is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outsldethe district or city, .or Is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. 4. 5. OR D b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval will be necessary to provide service. D D a. OR b. a. OR b. Water Is available at.the rate of flow and duration Indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant~ feet from the property (or as marked on the attache.d map): Rate of flow aiPe~k Demand . 0 Duratlon D. less than 500 gpm (approx. gpm) D less than 1 hour o soo to 999 gpm · D i hour to 2 hours A 7 181 1000 gpm or more 181·2 hours or more TTACHMENT_..,_ __ D flow test of gpm D D calculation of gpm other . --==-===--OF_-=-/=-==- . PAGE PAGE (Note:. Commercial building permits which Includes multlfarnlly structures requlre,fiow,test or :calculation.)··.·,.· · · ··· .. ·· · · · · .. :, , .· ·.'!GY)1,::'. , · , I :··<"\ , l I • 'L/ . t .. L.) _i . water system Is not capable of providing fire flow. • : ' " ;, ,,w,~ "• ' • .~ -• Water system has certificates of water right or water right claims sufficient to provlge servjce._ •... : Water system does not currently have necessary water rights or water right claims. ' . . ~-· . Comments/conditions: D.E. + Easements to District required. Current additional fe~s: $3200 GFC per ERU + meter charge ··, ... . '1' meter $1300 or 3/4" drop fee $450 I certify that th.e above water puryeyor Information Is true. This certlficatlcin sllall be valid forj_y~ru: frotn date of signature. KING COUN'TY WA-,rER DISTRICT #90 · . LESTER PIELE ·· .. ' :) RENEWAL FEES;W/IN i year $50.00 Agency name· ·•' , Signatory nam~ ·.\:J·,, '. : · .. ·.· "AFTER 1 yeat $125.00 SUPERINTENDENT of ~j? ~ . • . . 5/30/01 Title Signature . . · · Date C:\My Docume,nts Tawnya\Water AvallablUty\U.S. Land Development Associates.doc \I •, .. ,,® King County 1tJl:m;\_~~-=--~~~-=·E.,oiPO~R~n~R sCBOOL DIS'l'BlC'I' ,11 Transportation Supervi_sor Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwesc Renton, WA 98055-1219 Transportation Services (425) 837-6335 Cell (206) 819-2552 FAX (425) 837-6331 E-Mail: PORTERJ@lSSAQUAH.WEDNET.EDU DATE: ~\i I ~ Z,C()\ 805-2NDAVENUE5E. ~SAQUAH. WA 98027-4312 TO: ::reeci1u@ FM: f:(\KJ] 2:J)'.:UC('. RE: Proposed Plat of LUSD File No: LD!PQO/(o ~U)(T'/4{)1 ~ The Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has received an application for a subdivision in your District. Enclosed is a copy of the (1c,iscd) plat map received by the Land Use Services Division on .jt)I~ J Z11-Qo I In order for us to adequately evaluate this proposal, provide the most accurate information to the public, and for LUSD to serve the School District better, please provide us with the following information: Which schools do you anticipate the students living in this subdivision would attend? Elementary Br I"'-r 1/J O O d Jr. High/§) . l'.YJ 11-y w {) Q d Sr. High . Li b e fe-T1:J== Will the students walk or b~to these schools? Elementary kzc{ :rs:<-,( Jr. High/Middle ___ __.b"-"'""-'5~S::"-'J='----------------- Sr. High _______ -"'b_.u,_$.,.£:c.....d _ _._ ______________ _ If the students will be bussed, where do you anticipate the bus stops will be located? If that information is not available at this time, currently, where are the closest bus stops located to this site? Elementary /'7 rJ /1yf 5 £ ~ >E / 3~ J~ / ~() ,1ve Sc 9f ;, -v"'- SE / 3.S Jr. High/Middle /?t) M Se ~ Zc /3(,',h,. S'r- S1' Sr . High ___ ~/'--=(,:,c_;t):;__;_,c,tv-,_:____:S:;__E __ 'f __ s_· _£__:/c...::c3-='-_:_Sl:...}l-___ _ Other Comments : _..:5-f,.,._.c..c.::•.::;·. b-v..:.=.c:::.:f__:S"_--lW.::l<..1..< l.c/('--~..!:bo.Ll...;lt-""'-.( .>.:( <-::.___,.,frwC"--"'"'-L-· ~+o'--"---- Si,:, "' ,.s J, " s I will J., Vt { 0'/7~ ,20.Q.L_ to the address Please complete this form and return it by Avg. \~ below. If you have questions regarding this proposal, please call l:'.zt(t:() _______ at (206) 296-'//I 4-Thank you very much. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN: 14:ilUJ 6:h;t/d, , Planner 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Form96/SPRS/ReqSchol. Inf clc 1/6/2000_ ATTACHMENT~'6.::-..~ ~-..,;...-OF~='rl==,- PAGE PAGE ... • t • , <® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 October 17, 2002 Mike Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 Eighth Drive SE Bothell, WA 98021 .Edward J. McCarthy, P.E. Haozous Engineering, P.S. 14816 SE 116th Street Renton, WA 98059 RE: Evendell Subdivision SWM Adjustment Reguest {File No. L02V0024} Dear Applicant~gineer: · The-~ Services Division, Engineering Review Section, has completed review of the adjustment request for the Evendell subdivision. You are requesting approval for an adjustment from the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) Core Requirement No. 1, Section 1.2.1, Discharge at the Natural Location. Our review of the information and a site visit provides the following findings: I. The prorosed Evendell subdivision is located west of 160'h Avenue SE and south of SE 136' Street. The 75 lot, 11.7 acre, proposed Evendell subdivision is filed under Land Use Services Division (LUSD) file number LOIP0016. 2. The Evendell subdivision is located in the Orting Hills subbasin of the Lower Cedar River basin. The site is subject to the Level Two flow control and Basic water quality requirements of the 1998 KCSWDM. 3. The site consists of two adjoining, rectangular areas south of SE 136th Street split by 158'h Avenue SE. The smaller, western rectangle is 1.9 acres in size, while the larger, eastern rectangle is 9.8 acres. A common ridgeline passes approximately north- northwest to south-southeast through the two areas with the majority of the site draining to the east. The western subbasin sheetflows in a southwest direction through large, single family rarcels and is eventually intercepted by a ditch drainage system on the east side of 156' Avenue SE and flows south. The eastern subbasin sheetflows to the southeast and is eventually intercepted by a ditch system on the west side of 160th A venue SE and flows south. Both downstream drainage paths eventually recombine in an unclassified tributary of the Lower Cedar River. Most upstream flow is intercepted by ditches on the north side of SE 136th Street and is bypassed around the project site or through the wetland area in the northeast comer of the site. ATTACHMENT_q:.--- 3 I OF--=-:.,,,-;:=---:c:-p A~G=:-.E=--PAGE • ' -' , 'l Evendell/L02V0024 October 17, 2002 Page 2 of3 4. The proposal is to collect most runoff from the project site and direct it to two · facilities designed to separately accommodate drainage from the western and eastern areas of the site. The result is that 0.58 acres of the eastern subbasin will be diverted to the flow control vault and bioswale of the western rectangle of the site; and 0.73 acres of the western subbasin will be diverted to the combined wetpond/detention pond serving the eastern rectangle of the site. In the developed condition, the net effect is that 0.15 acres of the western subbasin will become tributary to the eastern subbasin's downstream drainage system. As a result, controlled outflows from the western area will be released farther upstream in the ditch system of 1561h Avenue SE reducing nuisance sheetflow through the intervening parcels. The release location from the eastern subbasin will remain the same. A negligible shift in flows in the two downstream drainage paths will result. The current conceptual drainage plan indicates that. a significant amount of frontage improvement drainage will bypass the planned RID facilities. · 5. No decorative ponds or shallow wells have been identified that would be affected by the proposed di:version. 6. The Level One and Three Downstream Drainage Analyses identified conveyance restrictions and nuisance flooding problems associated with both of the proposed downstream discharge locations. Although this adjustment is not addressing the potential for increased flow control standards as a result of the downstream drainage problems, the net impact of the proposed diversion will have a negligible impact on either downstream drainage path. Based on these findings, we hereby approve this adjustment to allow the diversion of on-site runoff between the two dr~inage subbasins to two separate facilities ultimately draining to their natural discharge locations with the following conditions: ' I. The release rates for the detention facilities will be based on the natural and diverted tributary areas being directed to the facilities. 2. The volume for the detention facility will be based on all flows directed to the facilities at full development under current zoning. The allowed release rates will be reduced by any undetained flows that would bypass the proposed subdivision drainage facilities. A 10 to 20 percent volumetric factor of safety must be applied to all storm events requiring detention. The design Technical Information Report shall state the factor 0f safety selected and the basis of that determination. · 3. Water quality facilities must be sized based on the entire proposed subdivision draining to the facilities including any required frontage improvements. 4. All onsite or offsite drainage facilities must be located in a public right-of-way or storm drainage tract dedicated to King County. ATTACHMENT~_q..;___ 2.. OF 3 ---PA.,..,G"""E=--PAGE • ~ :."' '). ... 1 ,,··.. • Evendell/L02V0024 October 17, 2002 Page 3 of3 5. Additional stonn drainage requirements identified by SEPA or the plat hearing review will apply to this project. If you have any further questions regarding this KCSWDM adjustment or the design requirements, please contact Mark Bergam at (206) 296-7270. Sincerely; James Sanders, P .E. Development Engineer Engineering Review Section Land Use Services Division Jim Chan, P.E. Supervising Engineer Site Engineering and Planning Section · Building Services Division cc: Curt Crawford, P.E., Managing Engineer, Stormwater Services, KCDNR Randall Parsons, P.E., Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Bruce Whittaker, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Karen Scharer, Planner II, Current Planning Section, LUSD Mark Bergam, P.):l., Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD q ATTACHMENT~~~ :; . O F---,,:-;3'::<-:=-_ PAGE PAGE r To be considered by the Metropolitan King County Council on June 30, 2003 at ~m. SUMMARY INFORMATION FOR THE METROPOLITAN KING COUNTY COUNCIL REGARDING AN APPEAL FROM THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER Proposed Ordinance Nos. 2003-0031 and 2003-0032 Department of Development and Environmental Services File Nos. L0IP0016 and L01TY401 EVENDELL er~ Proposed Plats and Rezone Request from R-4 to R-6 MAIN fll.E COt>Y Ordinances Concurring with Examiner's Recommendations Vicinity Map Examiner's Summary of Appeal Issues Examiner's Report and Decision Appeal Arguments U.S. Land Development Appeal Responses TABLE OF CONTENTS C.A.R.E./Gwendolyn High & Marsha Rollinger Shirlene Day Mark Costello Fred and Helga Jaques Mr. & Mrs. Edward J. Hill and Kristy Hill Mr. & Mrs. Edward W. Hilton Sally Nipert Michael Rae Cooke Department of Development and Environmental Services Preliminary Report Department of Development and Environmental Services Addendum Report (exhibit 3B) Department of Development and Environmental Services Revised Recommendations and Additional Conditions, dated March 10, 2003 ( exhibit 58) Page No. 5 6 IO 33 50 61 62 63 64 65 66 68 71 101 108 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JO 11 Proposed No. 2003-0031.2 KING COUNTY Signature Report June 20, 2003 Ordinance Sponsors Sullivan J 200 King County Courthouse 516ThirdAvenue Scanle, WA 98104 AN ORDINANCE denying the appeal by the applicant and concurring with the recommendation of the hearing examiner to approve, subject to the conditions recommended by the examiner, a preliminary plat of Evendell, on certain property located on the south side of · SE 1361h Street, between 1581h Avenue SE and 160 1h Avenue SE, at the request of U.S. Land Development Association/Centurion, as particularly described in DDES file no. LO I POO 16. 12 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 13 SECTION I. This ordinance does hereby adopt and incorporate the findings and 14 conclusions contained in the March 28, 2003 report and recommendation to the King 15 County council by the hearing examiner and adopts as the decision of the council the 16 recommendations by the hearing examiner to deny the application for preliminary plat 17 approval of the proposed plat of 70 lots, received March 26, 2002, and to grant the I Ordinance 18 application for preliminary approval, subject to the conditions recommended by the 19 examiner, of the proposed 46 lot alternative plat of Evendell, received March 26, 2002, in 20 DOES file no. LO I POO 16. 21 SECTION 2. The April 18, 2003 appeal by U.S. Land Development 22 Association/Centurion is denied. 23 24 ATTEST: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Cynthia Sullivan, Chair APPROVED this __ day of ______ , __ . Ron Sims, County Executive Attachments Hearing Examiner Report dated March 28, 2003 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Proposed No. 2003-0032.2 KING COUNTY Signature Report June 20, 2003 Ordinance Sponsors Sullivan 1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Sean le, WA 98104 AN ORDINANCE denying the appeal by U.S. Land Development/Centurion and concurring with the recommendation of the hearing examiner to deny the request for reclassification of certain property located on the south side of SE 136 1h Street, between 1561h Avenue SE and 1601h Avenue SE, as particularly described in ODES file no. LOITY401. JO BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 11 SECTION I. This ordinance does hereby adopt and incorporate the findings and 12 conclusions contained in the March 28, 2003 report and recommendation to the King 13 County council by the hearing examiner and adopts as the decision of the council the 14 recommendation by the hearing examiner to deny the application for reclassification of 15 certain property located on the south side of SE 136th Street, between 1561h Avenue SE 16 and l 60'h A venue SE, as requested by US Land Development Assocation/Centurion in 17 DOES file no. LOITY401. 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION w (/) AUG 2 9 2002 ~ WlPOOl® KING COUN1Y ~ S 136TH ST LAND USE SERVICES v ... w (/) SE 128TH ST ~ YJCINIJY MAP ~ W IO (/) ... SITE~ s ~ IO ... ST EXAMINER'S SUMMARY OF APPEAL ARGUMENTS RE: Dept. of Development and Environmental Services File Nos. L01P0016 and LOITY401 Proposed Ordinance Nos. 2003-0031 and 2003-0032 1. EVENDELL Proposed Rezone Request (from R-4 to R-6); Proposed 70 lot plat; and Proposed 46 lot alternative plat Examiner: James N. O'Connor 2. Parties to the Appeal: Appellant: Respondents: 3. Location: U.S. Land Development, represented by Robert D. Johns and Duana Kolouskova, Attorneys at Law C.A.R.E. (Citizens Alliance for a Responsible Evendell), represented by Gwendolyn High and Marsha Rollinger Shirlene Day Mark Costello Fred and Helga Jaques Mr. & Mrs. Edward J. Hill and Kristy J. Hill Mr. & Mrs. Edward W. Hilton Sally Nipert Michael Rae Cooke South of SE 136th Street, between 156th Avenue SE and 160th Avenue SE 4. Issues on Appeal: The appeal arises from three applications: (1) A request to rezone the property from R-4 to R-6; (2) a 70-lot preliminary plat based upon the proposed R-6 zone; and (3) an alternative 46-lot plat based upon the existing R-4 zone. 5. The examiner recommended denial of the rezone and approval of the 46-lot plat, subject to conditions. The appellant/applicant raises two issues on appeal. A. Should the rezone to R-6, and the accompanying 70-lot plat, be approved? B. If not, should the 46-lot plat be subject to the condition that requires dedication of 18 feet of right of way, and construction of improvements along the property frontage on SE 136'h Street, from 158'h Avenue SE to 160th Avenue SE (condition 8.d., pages 23 and 24)? Appellant's Arguments: DDES determined that the rezone and 70-lot plat complies with Comprehensive Plan policies and code requirements. The 70-lot plat would provide improved access to other properties in the area, and would construct a sewer lift station with excess capacity, providing a public benefit. This site was last rezoned in 1995, from SR-15,000 to R-4. Since that time, the following conditions or circumstances have changed: There have been significant amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, including a new 2000 Comprehensive Plan; All urban development must now be served by sewer; Sewer has become available to the site since 1995; There is a significant shortage of buildable land for detached single family housing; Increased density has been approved and constructed in the vicinity; Renton has annexed property in the area that has been rezoned and developed under the R-8 designation; The R-6 designation is consistent with Renton's Comprehensive Plan; Traffic in the area has increased dramatically. Impacts from the changed conditions affect the subject site differently than other properties in the area because: This site is larger, with more development potential than other sites in the vicinity, so that it can support the cost of improvements that provide benefits and urban services to the area; This site has the potential to open SE 136th Street to create an east-west connector to improve neighborhood circulation. Reclassification from R-4 to R-6 is consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies. The request complies with Policy U-1 I 8, which requires a minimum density of 4 dwelling units per acre. It complies with Policy U-120, requiring compatibility with the neighborhood. The proposal is within the density range set by the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map for the area, which shows 4-12 dwelling units per acre. R-6 is consistent with the Renton Comprehensive Plan, which sets a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per acre for this potential annexation area. The proposal implements Policy U-122, which supports increases in density when it would help resolve traffic or sewer deficiencies in the immediate neighborhood. The proposal would also help to achieve an average density of 7-8 homes per acre in the Urban Growth Area, consistent with Policy U-1 I 4. The required dedication and construction of SE I 36'h Street for the 46-lot plat violates the constitutional right to substantive due process, and is an unconstitutional taking of applicant's property. The subdivision will not have an impact justifying a required dedication or construction of SE I 36th Street. Respondent's Arguments: The I 995 area zoning was not the "last previous area zoning" of the property. The 2000 Comprehensive Plan update was the last previous review and change of development and zoning conditions. There has been no change in conditions since that review. The appellant's statement concerning the shortage ofbuildable lands is untrue. There is sufficient capacity in the whole county and in each sub-area lo accommodate growth expected to 2012 and well beyond. The South County Urban Unincorporated Area has a total capacity of 17,283 units; its remaining target to 2012 is 4,935. There is a surplus of 12,384 units. Changes to increase density must only be allowed as infrastructure is constructed. The City of Renton is not planning to increase the density in this area. A range of urban densities is permitted by the Comprehensive Plan. The current R-4 zone is within the allowable range for this site. Policy U-114 calls for average zoning density in the Urban Growth Area of 7 to 8 dwelling units per acre. To achieve this average, there must be areas of lower density as well as higher. The applicant has failed lo prove changed circumstances since the last area zoning on any point. This property is not affected by any changes any differently than other properties in the area. Policy U-114 states, "A lower density zone may be used to recognize existing subdivisions ... " The subdivision adjacent to the southwest is fully developed at R-4 density. Subdivisions adjacent to the northeast corner have been developed at the R-4 density. There are no developments at density greater than R-4 from 156th Avenue SE all the way east to Issaquah. Policy U-120 states that "King County shall not approve proposed zoning changes to increase density within the Urban Area unless: "a. The development will be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhood; ... " The surrounding development is a neighborhood of single-family homes on large parcels, with many rural characteristics. OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 850 Union Bank of California Building 900 Fourth A venue Seattle, Washington 98164 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO TIIE KING COUNTY COUNCIL March 28, 2003 ON APPLICATION FOR REZONE AND ALTERNATIVE APPLICATIONS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File Nos. L01POOI6 & L01TY401 Proposed Ordinance Nos. 2003-0031 & 2003-0032 EVENDELL REZONE AND SUBDIVISION Rezone and Alternative Preliminary Plat Applications Location: Applicant: lntervenors: South of SE 136"' between 156"' Ave. SE and 160"' Ave. SE US Land Development Association/Centurion, represented by Mike Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 -8"' Drive Southeast Bothell, WA 98021 Telephone: (425) 486-2563 Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Evendell, represented by Gwendolyn High 13405 -158"' A venue Southeast Renton, WA 98059 and Marsha Rollinger 15646 Southeast 138"' Place Renton, WA 98059 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services Land use Services Division, represented by Karen Scharer 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Telephone: (206) 296-7114 Facsimile: (206) 296-7055 /0 LOIP0016/LOJTY401-Evendell SUMMARY OF RECOMMEND A TIO NS: APPLICATION FOR RECLASSIFICATION (REZONE) Departmenl's Preliminary Recommendation: Department's Final Recommendation: Examiner: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION (70 LOT ALTERNATIVE) Department's Preliminary Recommendation: Approve, subject to conditions Approve, subject to conditions Deny Approve, subject to conditions 2 Department's Final Recommendation: Examiner: Approve, subject to conditions (modified) Deny PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION (46 LOT ALTERNATIVE) Department's Preliminary Recommendation: Department's Final Recommendation: Examiner: EXAMINER PROCEEDINGS: Hearing Opened: Hearing Closed: Approve, subject to conditions Approve, subject to conditions (modified) Approve, subject to conditions (modified) March 6, 2003 March 10, 2003 Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in the attached minutes. A verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the office of the King County Hearing Examiner. ISSUES/TOPICS ADDRESSED: • Comprehensive Plan Policies U-114, U-120, U-122 • Zone Reclassification Criteria • Changed Conditions or Circumstances • Neighborhood Compatibility • Tree Protection • Traffic Circulation and Impact Mitigation SUMMARY: Deny the application for a reclassification. Deny the application for the 70 lot subdivision as inconsistent with the current zoning. Approve the application for a 46 lot subdivision on 11.39 acres, subject to conditions. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: LO I POOi 6/LO I TY 401-Evendell REQUEST FOR RECLASSIFICATION FINDINGS: I. GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner: Representative: Localion: Acreage (Reclassification): Acreage (70 lot Plat): Acreage (46 lot Plat): Zoning: Proposed Zone: Proposed Use: Proposed Density(70 lot plat): Density ( 46 lot alternative): Lot Size (70 lot Plat): Lot Size (46 Lot Alternative): Sewage Disposal: Water Supply: Fire District: School District: Complete Applicalion Date: Threshold Detennination: Date of Issuance: King County Pennits: Pennit Contact: Community Plan: Drainage Subbasin: Section/fownship/Range: Assessor Parcel nos.: U.S. Land Development Association P.O. Box 22200 Seattle, WA 98122 Michael Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 8"' Dr. SE, Bothell, WA 98021 Phone: 425-486-2563 Facsimile: (425) 486-3273 e-mail: michael.j.romano@gte.net Lying south of SE 136th St. between 156"' Ave. SE and 160th Ave. SE. 13 acres 12.43 acres l L39 acres R-4 R-6 Single-family residential 5.6 dwelling units per acre (7.4 per net acre) 4 dwelling units per acre (5.2 per net acre) 3,900 to 6,600 square feet 5,400 to 14,000 square feet City of Renton King County Water District #90 King County Fire District #25 Issaquah September 20, 200 l Mitigated Detennination of Nonsignificance (MONS) December 23, 2002 Rezone & Subdivision Karen Scharer, Project Mgr II, Current Planning, LUSD Phone no. 296-7114, e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Newcastle Lower Cedar River SE 14-23-05 142305 9022 & 9009 2. The Subdivision Technical Committee (STC) of King County conducted an on-site examination of the subject property. The STC discussed the proposed development with the applicant to clarify technical details of the application, and to detennine the compatibility of this project with applicable King County plans, codes, and other official documents regulating this development. As a result of discussions, the applicant presented the STC with a conceptual build out plan of the immediate neighborhood, revised plans for frontage road improvements, and submitted a revised traffic study. The conceptual build out plan provided by the Applicant to DOES does not reflect the intentions or desires of the current owners of the properties shown. 3 LOIPOOl6/LOITY401-Evemlell Copies of drainage claims which have been submitted lo King County for problems in the area were provided lo the applicant, and an updated Level 3 drainage report was submitted December 9, 2002. 3. Under KCC 20.20.070, the request for rezone is no! vested under regulations in effect al the time of complete rezone application. Vesting lo zoning can only occur after the zone classification becomes effective. The 76 lot plat application is based on the requested rezone 10 R-6; therefore the 76101 plat application is no! vested. The applicant's 46 lot alternative plat application is vested under the existing R-4 zone. 4. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C, the responsible official of the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) issued a mitigated determination of environmental non-significance (MONS) for the proposed development on December 23, 2002. This determination was based on the review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent documents, resulting in the conclusion that the proposal would not cause probable significant adverse impacts on the environment if implemented with the required mitigation for the proposal. The MONS applies lo the proposed reclassification, 70 lot plat proposal, and allemalive 46 lo! plat proposal. Agencies, affected Native American tribes and the public were offered the opportunity to comment on or appeal the determination for 21 days. The MONS was no! appealed by any party, including the applicant, and is incorporated as part of the applicant's proposal. The MONS stales: The following mitigation measures shall be attached as conditions of permit issuance. These mitigation measures are consistent with policies, plans, rules, or regulations designated by KCC 20.44.080 as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority and in effect when this threshold determination is issued. Key sources of substantive authority for each mitigation measure are in parentheses; however, other sources of substantive authority may exist but are not expressly listed. A. East Drainage Basin: The 160th Ave SE downstream conveyance system shall be upgraded to provide/or the JOO-year storm capacity. Downstream driveway culverts/ditches and a cross- culvert under 16(/• Ave. SE shall be improved as follows: Culverts P-117 and P-116 on the west side of }6(/• Ave. SE, cross-culvert P-115, and culverts P-114 and P-113 on the east side of }6(/• Ave. SE shall be improved as needed. The culvert designations are according to the Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis by Haozous Engineering dated August 26, 2002. To address a related localized flooding condition, bank and channel stabilization are also required in the unopened right-of-way for 162"" Ave. SE, in the vicinity of the easterly line of Lot 12, Rich Lea Crest (address 16046 SE 142", Street). It is estimated that stabilizing and re-grading approximately 50 to JOO feet of channel, east of 16046 SE 142"d Street, will be adequate to resolve flooding that has occurred in the past location. The culverts and channel described are located from the south site boundary to a distance of approximately 1,700 feet downstream. Level 2 Flow Control design is required/or the proposed stormwaterdetention facility. A/actor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required/or detention storage volumes. 4 LOI POOi 6/LOITY 401-Evendell 5. A. B. West Drainage Basin: The stormwater detention facilities shall be designed to the Level 3 Flow Control Standard as described in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual ( KCSWDM). As an option, Level 2 Flow Control with downstream improvements can be proposed according to Core Requirement 2 of the KCSWDM. The minimum Flow Control Standard shall be Level 2. A factor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. {Comprehensive Plan Policies U-109, E-126, F-254 & F-255; RCW 58.17.110] Topography: The site is relatively level with a 20-foot difference in elevation from the north central area to the southwest and to the southeast comers of the site. B. Soils: Surface soils on this site per JGng County Soil Survey, 1973 include: AgC-Alderwood gravely, sandy loam; 6-15 % slopes. Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil type has a moderate limitation for low building foundations due to a seasonally high water table, and severe limitations for septic tank filter fields due to very slow permeability in the substratum. C. Sensitive Areas: There is a Class II Wetland located on the northeast portion of the site. The I 7, 162-sq. ft. wetland is classified as palustrine, forested, seasonally flooded/saturnted and as palustrine, emergent, seasonally flooded. Road improvements to SE 136"' Street would require filling of 200-sq. ft of. wetland, for which 400-sq. ft. of wetland enhancement is proposed as mitigation. Road improvements will also impact 6,989-sq. ft. of wetland buffer. Additional buffer area in the NE comer of the site could provide mitigation at a ratio equal to or greater than 2 to I. Improvements to the downstream drainage system will have to be reviewed to ensure that no wetlands are being drained or flooded as a result, no streams placed in pipes, and no streams damaged by increased flows. Enlarging culverts in sensitive areas, if any, requires clearing and grading permit(s). D. Hydrography: A preliminary June 15, 2001, technical information report was prepared by Haozous Engineering, P.S. on June 15, 2001. Subsequently a Level 3 Downstream Analysis was submitted August 26, 2002, and a Level Three Addendum was submitted December 5, 2002. The site is within the Orting Hills subbasin of the Cedar River watershed. Flooding has occurred in the past along downstream conveyance structures from the site on 160"' Ave. SE, on 156"' Ave. SE, and on nearby properties. These drainage issues are documented in the Level Three Downstream Analyses and Addendum and are addressed by mitigating conditions established in the MONS. E. Vegetation: The westerly 2.5 acres is mostly covered by pasture with some trees. More than half of the easterly 11 acres is wooded with a conifer upland forest, primarily Douglas fir. The far south of the parcel is developed with pasture; the north central area has been partially cleared as yard area associated with the home 5 LOJPOOJ6/LOITY401-Evendell 6 fronting 156"' Avenue SE. The south central area includes deciduous trees and native shrnbs. F. Wildlife: A wildlife study of the site was undertaken in conjunction with the wetland evaluation and delineation in 200 I. A large variety of small birds and animals were observed on site. Black tail deer and rnffed grouse, both "Priority Species" of Washington State, were observed. A single "State Candidate" species, the pileated woodpecker, was observed lo utilize the forested wetland area along with adjacent upland forested area onsite. None of the species identified in the applicant's report are required to be protected in the urban designated area of the County. However with preservation of the wetland and.a SO-foot buffer, some habitat will be retained on the site. Additional investigation was made by DOES environmental scientists and the Applicant's consulting biologist in March, 2003, lo review the site in response lo assertions that a red tail hawk nest exists on the site. The preponderance of the evidence is that there are no red tail hawk or other raptor nests on the subject property. 6. The subject property is within an area east of Renton known as Brierwood, in the southern portion of the Newcastle Community Plan area. The Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council serves the area under the King County Citizen Participation Initiative. The area within which the property is located is designated "urban residential, 4-12 dwelling units per acre", by the King County Comprehensive Plan. The zoning for the subject property and the surrounding area, generally extending from SE 128"' on the north lo SE 144"' and beyond on the south, and from Renton on the west to 168"' Avenue SE and beyond to the east, is zoned R-4. The principle exception is the J.'lat of Highland Estates, 60 lots on 8.67 acres lying between 152 00 Avenue SE and 154 Avenue SE, on the south side of SE I 36'h Street. Highland Estates was reclassified from R-4 to R-8 in 2001. Its northwest comer is adjacent to 218 lots under development within the plat of Maplewood in the City of Renton. The southern portion of the plat of Maplewood, which is the portion nearest lo Highland Estates, was zoned R-8 by Renton. In 2001, it was being developed with an average lot size of 4,500 square feet in the area closest to the Highland Estates property. Directly west of the Highland Estates site is an undeveloped King County park. Parcels lying to the north were sparsely developed in 200 I, and were expected to convert to urban densities. The Examiner in that case also found a potential for higher urban density redevelopment of parcels lying east and southeast of Highland Estates. The neighborhood lying to the south of Highland Estates contained newer residential properties, which were found unlikely to redevelop in the near future. Most of those properties are approximately 'A acre in size. Impact on the properties to the south was mitigated by not opening 152"" A venue SE, so as lo insulate the lower density neighborhood to the southwest from the impacts of higher density associated with Maplewood and Highland Estates. I~ LOI POOi 6/LOITY 401-Evendell Maplewood brought sewer into the neighborhood, which could be extended to serve Highland Estates, and road and traffic requirements for the two plats were found to be interconnected. 7. The developer of the subject property proposes to build a sewer pump station, dedicate right- of-way, construct roads, and make drainage improvements in conjunction with the 70 lot proposed plat, all of which will facilitate urban development in the area. Comprehensive Plan policy U-122 supports increases in urban residential density through a rezone or through density transfers when the proposal will help resolve traffic, sewer, water, parks or open space deficiencies in the immediate neighborhood. DDES relies primarily on Policy U-122 as justification for recommending reclassification of the property to R-6. Most of the same improvements also would he built to support the 46 lot alternative plat proposed under the existing R-4 zone classification. The impacts from development of 46 Jots require similar sewer and surface water drainage improvements, which address major concerns in the area. Recreation and open space deficiencies are met in the same manner by both proposed plats, with only proportionate differences, based on the fewer number of lots in the 46 lot alternative. Neighborhood traffic circulation is the one urban infrastructure concern which is addressed differently by the two plat proposals. The King County Department of Transportation and DDES have identified a need for an east-west street connection from 156th Avenue SE to 160'h Avenue SE, hetween SE 128th Street and SE 144th Street. SE 136th Street is the most viable option for that connection because of its existing 30 foot wide public right-of-way from 156"' Avenue SE to l 60'h Avenue SE. The Applicant would agree to provide additional right-of-way , varying from 18 feet to 25 feet, and improvements that would open SE 136"' Street from 156"' Avenue SE to l 60'h Avenue SE, if the 70 Jot plat is approved. If the zone reclassification and 70 lot plat are denied, the developer objects to any requirement for dedication of right-of-way or construction of improvements to provide plat access and neighborhood traffic circulation by way of SE 136"' Street. DDES nonetheless recommends dedication of 18 feet of right-of-way for SE 136th Street along the frontage of the 46 lot plat, and the Exal]liner also recommends improvements to the right-of-way to mitigate the impacts of that plat (see finding no. 2 at page I 0). 8. KCC 21A.44.060 provides that a zone reclassification shall he granted only if the applicant demonstrates that the proposal complies with the criteria for approval specified in KCC 20.24.180 and 190, and is consistent with the comprehensive plan and applicable community and functional plans. 9. KCC 20.24.180 addresses the requirement for hearing examiner findings and conclusions generally, including a requirement for a conclusion that the examiner's recommendation "will not be unreasonably incompatible with or detrimental to affected properties and the general public." KCC 20.24.180. 10. KCC 20.24.190 addresses applications for reclassifications specifically. It requires that an Examiner recommendation for reclassification of property include findings that support at least one of the circumstances descrihed in that section. The portion of the section applicable to this proceeding is subpart "D", which provides: "The applicant has demonstrated with substantial evidence that: I. Since the last previous area zoning or shoreline environment designation of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private 7 /? LOI POOi 6/LOITY 401-Evendell development or other conditions or circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone substantial and material change not anticipated or contemplated in the subarea plan or area zoning; 2. TI1e impacts from the changed conditions or circumstances affect the subject property in a manner and to a degree different than other properties in the vicinity sue~ that area rezoning or redesignation is not appropriate; For the purposes of this subsection, "changed conditions or circumstances" does not include actions taken by the current or former property owners to facilitate a · more intense development of the property including but not limited to changing tax limitations, adjusting property lines, extending services, or changing property ownership; 3. For proposals to increase rural residential density, that the proposal meets the criteria in Comprehensive Plan policies R-205 through R-209; 4. For proposals to increase urban residential density, that the proposal meets the criteria in Comprehensive Plan policies U-118 through U-123; and 5. The requested reclassification or redesignation is in the public interest. (Ord. 14047 § 12, 2001: Ord. 4461 § 10, 1979). 11. R-4 is the zoning applied to this area by the King County Council. The 1994 Comprehensive Plan and 1995 Area Zoning changed the zoning in this vicinity from SR-15,000 to R-4. That zoning was reaffirmed in 2001 with the adoption of the 2000 King County Comprehensive Plan amendments. "Official zoning ... is contained in the SITUS file and is depicted on the official zoning maps, as maintained by the Department of Development and Environmental Services." Ordinance 14044, Section 3, February 12, 2001. The current R-4 zone classification is consistent with the Urban Land Use policies of the King County Comprehensive Plan. 12. Existing development in the area surrounding Evendell is generally on lots ranging from 15,000 square feet to I \<I acres, with a few smaller and a few larger. Redevelopment and infill will occur over time in much of the area, creating smaller lots, but a substantial portion of the area will remain as currently developed for the indefinite future. The general character of existing development is individually built homes, with yards, gardens, trees and some pasture area and outbuildings, generating an overall impression of a suburban or somewhat rural area. The density of development permitted by the R-4 zone classification is greater than that which presently exists in the area. The existing R-4 zone classification provides a base density of 4 dwelling units per acre and allows a maximum of 6 dwelling units per acre. Maximum impervious surface allowed for a development within the R-4 zone is 55%. The R-6 zone classification requested by the Applicant provid.es a base density of 6 dwelling units per acre, a maximum density of 9 dwelling units per acre, and maximum impervious surface of 75% of the site. 13. Since the last previous area zoning, the approval and commencement of construction of the proposed plats of Maplewood and Highland Estates have brought sewer closer to the subject property. An additional road connection has been opened to the west and north, by way of I/ 8 LOJP0016/LOITY401-Evendell SE I 361 • Street, which now connects to SE 1281 • Street at 1481 • Avenue SE. The subject property, however, has three pre-existing direct connections to SE 128"' Street, by way of I 56"' A venue SE, I 58'" Avenue SE and 160'" Avenue SE, which have remained unchanged. The greater proximity of sewer service allows for development of the subject property at the R-4 permitted density, as well as at the higher density requested by the Applicant. The Kfog County Comprehensive Plan requires that property in the R-4 zone classification be developed with sewers, indicating that the Council's adoption and retention of the R-4 zone classification anticipated the availability of sewers in the area. There is no evidence that the closer proximity of sewers was not anticipated at the time of the last area zoning, or that it affects the subject property in a manner and to a degree different than other properties in the vicinity. CONCLUSIONS: I. The Applicant has not demonstrated with substantial evidence that authorized public improvements, pennitted private development or other conditions or circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone substantial and material change since the last previous area zoning which were not anticipated or contemplated by that area zoning. 2. The applicant has not demonstrated with substantial evidence that impacts from any conditions or circumstances that have changed since the last previous area zoning affect the subject property in a manner and to a degree different than other properties in the vicinity. Any reclassification of the subject property should be considered legislatively in conjunction with consideration of the appropriate zoning for the area within which the subject property is located. 3. The proposal partially meets the purpose of Comprehensive Plan Policy Ul22 that supports increases in density to help resolve traffic circulation deficiencies in the immediate neighborhood. However, reclassification of the subject property to R-6 would be inconsistent with policy U-120, which provides that, "King County shall not approve proposed zoning changes to increase density within the urban area unless: a. The development will be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhood; ... " 4. Reclassification of the Highland Estates property is distinguished from this application by the facts of that case, particularly its location adjacent to the development of 4,500 square foot lots in the City of Renton, the interconnection and overlapping of the road improvements necessary for the development of Maplewood and Highland Estates, and the greater separation of Highland Estates from fully developed properties on larger lots. Reclassification of the property under consideration in this case would result in 13 acres of R- 6 zoned property entirely surrounded by R-4 zoned property .. 5. The application for a reclassification of the subject property should be denied. RECOMMENDATION: DENY the application for reclassification. 9 LOIPOOl6/LOITY401-Evendell APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL (70 LOT PROPOSAL) FINDINGS: I. To the extent applicable, the findings set forth above with respect to the application for reclassification are incorporated herein as if fully set forth. 2. The Applicant proposes to develop 70 lots on 12.43 acres, with a density of 5.63 dwelling units per acre. The base density of the R-4 zone permits development of not more than 4 dwelling units per acre, or a total of 50 units, unless augmented by density bonuses or development credits transferred from other sites. No such augmentations are incorporated in the proposal. CONCLUSIONS: I. The proposed plat exceeds the density allowed for the site by"the King County Zoning Code. 2. The application for preliminary plat approval should be DENIED. RECOMMENDATION: Deny the application for preliminary approval of the proposed plat of 70 lots, received March 26, 2002. APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL (46 LOT ALTERNATIVE) FINDINGS: I. To the extent applicable, the findings set forth above with respect to the application for reclassification are incorporated herein as if fully set forth. 2. The proposed development of 46 lots on I 1.39 acres is bounded by SE 136th Street on the north (from 158th Avenue SE to I 60th Avenue SE), and I 60'h Avenue SE on the east. If SE 136th Street is an unimproved, 30 foot wide, county right-of-way between 156th Avenue SE and I 60th A venue SE, with a paved area abutting the proposed plat at the intersection with I 58th A venue SE. 160"' Avenue SE is a two lane neighborhood collector that runs from SE 125th Street to SE 144th Street. The roadway width is approximately 24 feet, with a paved shoulder on the east · side of the roadway. It is unstriped. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The existing construction of 160th A venue SE is a rural design. I 58th A venue SE is also a two-lane neighborhood collector, similar to I 60"' A venue SE, but with little or no dirt shoulders on either side of the roadway. The posted speed limit on I 58"' A venue SE is also 25 mph. Traffic to and from the proposed development is proposed by the Applicant to have access only to 160th Avenue SE. The intersection of 160th Avenue SE and SE 128th Street, a 10 LOI POOI 6/LOITY 401-Evendell principle ar1erial, would be the principle route for traffic to and from this plat to the nor1h and west. Level of service at SE 128'" Street and 160'" Avenue SE was projected to be "E" for nor1h bound left turns during peak hours for the 70 Jot plat, which would have had an alternative route through a signalized intersection ( 156"' Avenue SE and SE 128"' Street) to the nor1h and west. The level of service for that traffic movement for this proposal during the AM peak hour does not appear to have been analyzed. Traffic circulation to and from the subject proper1y, and neighborhood traffic circulation, would be improved by the provision of alternative routes (158"' Avenue SE currently and 156"' Avenue SE in the future), so that residents of the site could avoid using 160"' Avenue SE for congested traffic movements. Dedication and improvement of right-of-way along SE 136"' Street adjacent to this plat will provide for the enhanced safety and welfare of the residents of this plat and the public. Dedication and improvements consistent with King County Road Standards for an urban subcollector would be propor1ionate to the impacts of this plat. The Applicant should have the oppor1unity, if he chooses, to modify the traffic circulation within the plat to provide a direct access to SE 136"' Street, as well as 160"' A venue SE. As proper1ies in the area are developed or redeveloped to urban densities, improvement of street frontage to urban standards is a reasonable and propor1ionate requirement to provide traffic circulation for the increasing population of the area. The King County Road Standards, Section 1.03, provides that any land development which will impact the service level, safety, or operational efficiency of serving roads ... shall improve those roads in accordance with these standards. 3. The subject subdivision will be served by the Issaquah School District, which has adopted capacity figures which indicate their ability to accommodate additional students. Students living in the proposed plat would be bussed to and from all schools. The Issaquah School District has adopted a fee of $3,924 for each new single-family residential unit, as a school impact fee. For1y six dwelling units would be added by the proposal to the Issaquah School District. 4. Adequacy of Ar1erial Roads: This proposal has been reviewed under the·criteria in King County Code 14.70, Transpor1ation Concurrency Management; 14.80, Intersection Standards; and King County Code 14.75; Mitigation Payment System. a. King County Code 14.70-Transpor1ation Concurrency Management: The Transpor1ation Cer1ificate of Concurrency indicates that transpor1ation improvements or strategies will be in place at the time of development, or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies within six (6) years, according to RCW 36.70A.070(6). b. King County Code 14.80 -Intersection Standards: If-an alternative route to SE 128"' Street, other than 160'" A venue SE, is provided, the existing ar1erial system will accommodate the increased traffic volume generated by this proposal. If 160"' A venue SE were to be the only route to SE 128"' Street, there is not sufficient information in the record to determine whether or not the intersection of 160"' Avenue SE and SE 128"' Street would meet county standards during the AM peak hour with this proposed development. l l LOJPOOJ6/LOITY401-Evendell c. King County Co<le.14.75 -Mitigation Payment System: King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), requires the payment of a traffic impact mitigation fee (MPS fee) and an administration fee for each single family residential lot or unit created. MPS fees are determined by the zone in which the site is located. This site is in Zone 452 per the MPS/Quarter section list. MPS fees may be paid at the time of final plat recording, or deferred until building permits are issued. The amount of the fee will be determined by the applicable fee ordinance at the time the fee is collected. 5. The nearest public park is located on the southwest comer of 152"" Avenue SE and SE 136th Street. The Applicant has proposed on-site recreation in combination with the on-site detention facility at the southeast comer of the property, and a separate recreation tract adjacent to the north of the combination detention/recreation tract. The details of improvemenls will be designed and submitted for approval prior to recording the final plat. The area contained in proposed tracts E and F appear sufficient to meet the minimum requirements of KCC 21A.14.180. 6. Fire Protection: The Certificate of Water Availability from Water District 90 indicates that water is presently available to the site in sufficient quantity to satisfy King County Fire Flow Standards. Prior to final recording of the plat, the water service facilities must be reviewed and approved per King County Fire Flow Standards. 7. Sewage Disposal: A Certificate of Sewer Availability, dated May 18, 2001 indicates the city's capability to serve the proposed development (see Attachment 6). A sewage pump stalion will be conslmcted on !he soulheasl comer of the plat as the property currently can not be served by gravity flow. By providing a pump station, approximately 37 acres in the immediate area will have sewer available. The existing sewer line will be extended east along SE 136th Street to the subject property to provide connection to Renton's sewer system. 8. Waler Supply: The applicant proposes to serve the subject subdivision with waler from Water District 90. A Certificate of Water Availability, dated May 30, 2001, indicates this district's capability to serve the proposed development (see Attachment 7). 9. Neighbors on adjacent Jots to the west of the proposed plat expressed concerns that trees on their lots would be affected by development activity on the site of !he proposal. A 50-foot . wide buffer area was requested by the neighbors; an easement protecting the drip line of affected trees near the property line was recommended by the Department. No authority was cited to the Examiner which supports the imposition of a burden on the Applicant's property to protect trees on adjoining properties. CONCLUSIONS: I. If approved subject to the conditions recommended below, the proposed subdivision will comply with !he goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision and Zoning Codes, and other official land use controls and policies of King County. 2. If approved subject to the conditions recommended below, this proposed subdivision will make appropriate provision for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces, for drainage ways, streets, other public ways, transit stops, potable water 12 LOl POOi 6/LOITY 401-Evendell supply, sanilary wastes, parks and recrealions, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and safe walking condilions for studenls who only walk lo school; and it will serve !he public use and inlerest. 3. The conditions for final plat approval recommended below are in !he public inlerest and are reasonable requirements lo mitigate the impacts of 1his development upon the environment. 4. The dedicalions of land or easements within and adjacent lo the proposed plat, as recommended by the conditions for final plat approval or as shown on !he proposed preliminary plat submitted by the applicant, are reasonable and necessary as a direct result of the development of this proposed plat, and are proportionale lo !he impacts of the development. 5. This proposal is subject to the mitigated determinalion of environ menial non-significance issued December 23, 2002. The conditions of !hat MDNS mus! be implemented as conditions of this preliminary plat approval. The impacts of the culvert and channel improvemenls required in the east drainage basin, for a distance approximately 1,700 downstream from the plal, togelher with the change in flow volume resulting from development of !he subject property, should be analyzed by !he Applicant and reviewed by DDES lo delermine the impacts, if any, downslream from !he improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed of Evendell, 46 lot alternative, received March 26, 2002 subjecl lo the following conditions of final plat approval: 1. Compliance with all plaiting provisions of Title 19 of the King County Code. 2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plal a dedication which includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952. 3. The plat shall comply with the base density (and minimum density) requirements of the R-4 zone classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-4 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, whichever is larger. The plat layout may be revised to provide vehicular access to SE 136"' Street as well as 160"' Avenue SE. Other minor revisions to the plat which do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. 4. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopled by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended ()993 KCRS), except to the extent that variances from those standards are approved by the County Road Engineer. 5. The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow standards of Chapter 17 .08 of the King County Code. 13 LOJ !'0016/LOJTY 401-Evendell 6. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number ancVor location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and applicable updates adopted by King County. DDES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DDES Engineering Review, shall be shown on· the engineering plans. c. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings # on file with DOES ancVor the King County Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for individual lot infiltration systems, the systems shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with plans on file." d. The storrnwater detention design shall comply with the Level 2 Flow Control requirements per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). e. The storm water control facility shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King County unless portions of the drainage tract are used for required recreation space in accordance with KCC 21A.14.180. 7. Drainage adjustment L02V0024 is approved for this project. All conditions of approval for this adjustment shall be met upon submittal of the engineering plans. 8. The following road improvements are required to be constructed according to the 1993 King County Road Standards(KCRS): a. SE 137"' St. shall be improved to the urban subcollector standard: b. The internal loop road(l58"' Pl SE, SE 138"' ST, and 159"' Pl SE) shall be improved to the urban subaccess street standard. c. The short cul-d-sac road off SE 137"' ST shall be improved to the urban minor access street standard, unless this street is extended to SE 136"' Street, in which event it shall be improved to the urban subcollector standard. d. FRONT AGE: Eighteen feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated along the plat frontage on SE 136"' Street (from 158"' Avenue SE to 160"' Avenue SE). The frontage along SE 136"' Street (south side only) and 160"' Ave SE (west side only) shall be improved to the urban neighborhood collector standard. 14 LOI POOi 6/LOITY 401-Evcndell The SE 136"' Street frontage from l 58'h Avenue SE to I 60"' Avenue SE shall be improved to the urban Y, street standard, except that no sidewalk shall be required to be constmcted on the north side. e. Tracts A, B, and D shall be improved to lhe joint use driveway standard per Section 3.01 of the KCRS. f. Tract C shall be improved to the private access tract standard per Section 2.09 of the KCRS. g. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered according to the variance provisions in Section I .08 of the KCRS. 9. There shall be no direct vehicular access to or from I 60"' Ave. SE from those lots, which abut this street. A note to this effect shall appear on the engineering plans and final plat. The Applicant may redesign the plat to allow direct access to SE I 36"' Street for those lots which abut SE 136"' Street and do not abut the internal street system. (Joint use driveway tracts and pipe stems shall not be considered as abutting the internal street system) 10. (See condition 8 above) 11. Off-site access to the subdivision shall be over a full-width, dedicated and improved road that has been accepted by King County for maintenance. If the proposed access road has not been accepted by King County at the time of recording, then said road shall be fully bonded by the applicant of this subdivision. I 2. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final plat recording. 13. The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as detennined by the applicable fee ordinance. The applicant has the option lo either: (I) pay the MPS fee at final plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building pennit application. 14. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the Sensitive Areas Code as outlined in KCC 21A.24. Preliminary plat review has identified the following specific requirements that apply to this project. All other applicable requirements from KCC 21A.24 shall also be addressed by the applicant. a. This site contains a Class 2 wetland. The wetland will be protected from alteration during and after construction, with a 50-foot wide buffer around the wetland boundary. An additional 15-foot building setback is required beyond the edge of the buffer. b. A maximum of 200 square feet of wetland will be filled for construction of SE 136"' Street. Mitigation shall consist of at least 400 square feet of wetland enhancement to 15 LOI POOi 6/LOITY 401-Evendell degraded portions of the existing wetland. Road improvements for 160'h Avenue SE and SE 136"' Street will eliminate an area of wetland buffer. Mitigalion shall consist of providing at least an equivalenl area of buffer added lo 1he northeasl portion of !he site. c. Downstream drainage improvements lo existing culverts and stom1wa1er conveyances required through the SEPA MONS shall cause no adverse alleralion lo existing wellands or streams in !he vicinity of !he drainage improvemenls. d. Critical Areas staff shall review engineering plans for the plat for conformance wilh these requirements. 15. The following note shall be shown on the final engineering plan and recorded plat: RESTRICTIONS FOR SENSITIVE AREA TRACTS AND SENSITIVE AREAS AND BUFFERS Dedication of a sensitive area tracl/sensitive area and buffer conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the tracl/sensitive area and buffer. This interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes thal benefit the public heallh, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The sensitive area tracl/sensitive area and buffer imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the land subjecl to the tracl/sensitive area and buffer the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by King County, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegelation within the lracl/sensilive area and buffer. The vegetation within the tracllsensitive area and buffer may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without approval in writing from the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services or its successor agency, unless otherwise provided by law. The common boundary between 1he tracl/sensitive area and buffer and the area of development activity must be marked or otherwise flagged to the salisfaction of King County prior to any clearing, grading, building construction or other development ac1ivity on a lot subject to the sensitive area tracl/sensitive area and buffer. The required marking or flagging shall remain in place until all development proposal activities in the vicinity of the sensitive area are completed. No building foundations are allowed beyond the required 15-foot building setback line, unless otherwise provided by law. 16. Suitable recreation space shall be provided consistent with the requirements KCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21A.14.190 for providing sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic tablc[s], benches, etc. a. A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) shall be submitted for review and approval by DDES and King County Parks prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the engineering plans. This plan shall comply with Ordinance# 14045. b. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. 16 LOI POOi 6/LOITY 401-Evendell 17. A homeowners'association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction of DDES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation. open space and/or sensitive area tract(s). 18. Street trees shall be included in the design of all road improvements, and shall comply with Section 5.03 of the KCRS and KCC 21A.16.050: a. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. b. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. c. If King County detennines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of- way line. d. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the · face of the final recorded plat. e. The species of trees shall be approved by DDES if located within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. f. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by ODES prior to engineering plan approval. g. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a.maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after ODES has completed a second inspectio~ and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. A landscape-inspection fee shall also be submitted prior to plat recording. The inspection fee is subject to change based on current County fees. School Mitigation Fees 19. Lots within this subdivision are subject to King County Code 21A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and 17 LOI POOi 6/LOJTY 401-Evendell SEPA collected immediately prior to recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. 20. The following have been established by SEPA as necessary requirements to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of this development. The applicants shall demonstrate compliance with these items prior to final approval. a. East Drainage Basin: b. The 160th Ave. SE downstream conveyance system shall be upgraded to provide for the 100-year storm capacity. Downstream driveway culverts/ditches and a cross- culvert under 1601h Ave. SE shall be improved as follows: Culverts P-117 and P-116 on the west side of 1601h Ave. SE, cross-culvert P-115, and culverts P-114 and P-113 on the east side of 1601h Ave. SE shall be improved as needed. The culvert designations are according to the Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis by Haozous Engineering dated August 26, 2002. To address a related localized flooding condition, bank and channel stabilization are also required in the unopened right-of- way for 162"" Ave. SE, in the vicinity of the easterly line of Lot 12, Rich Lea Crest (address 16046 SE 142"" Street). It is estimated that stabilizing and re-grading approximately 50 to 100 feet of channel, east of 16046 SE 142"' Street, will be adequate to resolve flooding that has occurred in the past location. The culverts and channel described are located from the south site boundary to a distance of approximately 1,700 feet downstream. Level 2 Flow Control design is required for the proposed stormwater detention facility. A factor of safety of 5 to I 5 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. West Drainage Basin (if applicable): The stormwater detention facilities shall be designed to the Level 3 Flow Control Standard as described in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). As an option, Level 2 Flow Control with downstream improvements can be proposed according to Core Requirement 2 of the KCSWDM. The minimum Flow Control Standard shall be Level 2. A factor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. Additional Drainage Consideration: 21. The applicant shall provide additional analysis, to be reviewed and approved by DOES, to assure that downstream improvements, in conjunction with additional runoff volume from the site as developed, will not exacerbate drainage and flooding problems between the termination of the required downstream culvert and ditch improvements and SE 144m Street. ORDERED this 28th day of March, 2003 18 LOI POOi 6/LOITY 401-Evcndell TRANSMITTED this 28th day of March, 2003, to the parties and interested persons of record: .. 4 Creeks UAC Attn: Claudia Donnelly P.O. Box3501 Renton WA 98056 Ronda Bryant 15406 SE 136th Street Renton WA 98059 Michael Rae Cooke 13125158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Roger Dorstad Evergreen East Realty POBox375 Redmond WA 98073 Mark Heckert Habitat Technologies 606E Main St. Puyallup WA 98371-1088 Edward & June Hill 13527 156th St. SE Renton WA 98059 Fred & Helga Jaques 13114 · 158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Don Kezele 15657 SE 137th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Rebecca Lind 1055 S. Grady Way Renton WA 98058 Heckert, Mark Habitat Technologies 606 E Maine St. Puyallup WA 98371-1088 Jim McDougal 14502 167th Pl. SE Renton WA 98059 Steven & Peri Muhich 13420 • 160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Gary Norris Gary Struthers & Associates 3150 Richards Road #100 Bellevue WA 98005 Scott D. Baker 7018 47th Ave. NE Seattle WA 98115 Marilyn Carlson 13616 • 156th Avae. SE Renton WA 98059 Robert Darrow Haozous Enginee'ring 15428. 45th Court Mukilteo WA 98275 Michelle Hagennan 13710156th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Valerie Hemnes 15627 SE 139th Pl. Renton WA 98059· 7 422 Edward & Nancy Hilton 13414 -158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Leonard J. Johnston 16016 SE 135th Renton WA 98059 Joann Lee 13802 · 160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Steve Lyman 14505 • 160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Fred & Gloria Martin 13019 • 160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Bill Mokin 14404 • 162nd Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 John Nanney 16169 SE 146th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Florence Nott 15915 SE 134th Pl. Renton WA 98059~6832 Marshall Brenden 18225 SE 128th Renton WA 98059 Ronald Coffin 16015 SE 135th Pl. Renton WA 98059-6828 Shirley Day 14412 • 167th Pl. SE Renton WA 98059 Stephen & Yvonne Hanson 15611 SE 138th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Victor & Gwendolyn High 13405 · 158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Kurt Hughes 19112 NE 146thWay Woodinville WA 98072-6361 Diane Kazele 15657 SE 137th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Tim & Gina Lex 13116 • 158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Jerry Marcy P.O. Box575 Seattle WA 98111 Linda Matlock WA State Ecol. Dept.,WOSW Unit P0Box47696 Olympia WA 98504· 7696 Eleanor Moon KC Executive Horse Council 12230 NE 61st Kirkland WA 98033 Sally Nipert 14004 -156th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 DaveNybJom 13606. 158th Avenue SE Renton WA 98059 19 LOI POOi 6/LOI TY 401-Evendell Richard & Anita Oliphant 16519 SE 1451h SI. Renton WA 98059 David Platt 510 Panoramic Or. Camano Island WA 98282 Mike Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 8th Drive SE Bothell WA 98021 Char1es & Viola Scoby 13112 • 158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059-8531 Howard Stansbury US Land Development Association 22617 • 81h Dr. SE Bothell WA 98021 David Wader 15635 SE 13Blh Pl. Renton WA 98059 Kurt Wilson Harbour Homes 101 o South 336th Street #305 Federal Way WA 98003 Greg Borba DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 Kristen Langley DDES/LUSD Land Use Traffic MS OAK-DE-0100 Larry West DDES/LUSD Geo Review MS OAK-DE-0100 Dave Petrie 811 S 273rd Court Des Moines WA 98198 David Rockabrand Four Creeks UAC 11427 162nd Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Geneva Scholes 12924 • 1581h Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Karen & Jeffrey Sidebotham 13004 • 1581h Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Peggy Streit 13512 • 160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Alex Weitz 15646 SE 1381h Pl. Renton WA 98059 Alvin Wolberg 16021 SE 1361h St. Renton WA 98059 Laura Casey DDES/LUSD Wetland Review MS OAK-DE-0100 Carol Rogers LUSD/CPLN MS OAK·DE-0100 Bruce Whittaker DDES/LUSD Prel. Review Engineer MS OAK·DE-0100 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL David Petrie 811 S. 273rd Ct. Des Moines WA 98198 Marsha Rollinger 15646 SE 13Blh Pl. Renlon WA 98059 Curtis Schuster KBS Ill, LLC 12505 Bel-Red Rd., Ste. 212 Bellevue WA 98005 Daniel B. Slaton 15315 SE 133rd Court Renlon WA 98059 Penny Thorbeck 15650 SE 138th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Mr. & Mrs. Bob Wilmot 13900 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Harold & Eleanor Zeek 16612 SE 145th St. Renton WA 98059 Kim Claussen DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 Karen Scharer DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 In order to appeal the decision of the Examiner, written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Kfog County Council with a fee of $250.00 (check payable to King County Office of Finance) on or before April 11, 2003. If a notice of appeal is filed, the original and six (6) copies of a written appeal statement specifying the basis for the appeal and argument in support of the appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King County Council on or before April 18, 2003. Appeal statements may refer only to facts contained in the hearing record; new facts may not be presented on appeal. 20 l ·• LOI POOi 6/LOJTY 401-Evcndell Filing requires actual delivery to the Office of the Clerk of the Council, Room 1025, King County Courthouse, 516 3'' Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104, prior to the close of business (4:30 p.m.) on the date due. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Clerk does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Office of the Clerk is not open on !he specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient lo meet the filing requirement. MINUTES OF THE MARCH 6 AND JO, 2003 PUBLIC HEARING ON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FILE NO. LOJPOOJ6 AND LOITY401 James N. O'Connor was the Hearing Examiner in this matter. Participating in the hearing were Karen Scharer, Kristin Langley, Bruce Whittaker and Laura Casey, representing the Department; Mike Romano, representing the Applicant; Marsha Rollinger and Gwendolyn High, representing the lntervenors; and Mark Heckert, Gary Norris, Scott Baker, Michael Rae Cooke, David Rockabrand, Dave Petry, Michelle Hagerman, Sally Nipert, Diane Kazele, Alex Weitz, Fred Jaques, Jim McDougal, John Nanney, Bill Mokin, Anita Oliphant, Vanessa Burris, June Hill, Rhonda Bryant, and Kristy Hill. The following exhibits were offered and entered into the record: Exhibit No. I DOES combined file LOITY401 & LOI POOi 6, application filed and dated July 6, 2001 Exhibit No. 2A ODES application for land use permit(s) LOITY401 & LOIPOOl6, application dated July 6, 2001 2B Zone reclassification application and justification questionnaire with revision received September 6, 200 I Exhibit No. 3A ODES preliminary report prepared 02/20/03 with attachments as follow: I. Map of rezone from R-4 to R-6 2. Reduced copy of R-6-70 lot preliminary plat 3. Reduced copy of R-4 -alternative 46 Jot plat 4. Density calculations for R-6 plat 5. City of Renton January 20, 2003, Jetter 6. City of Renton June I 5, 200 I letter 7. Certificate of water availability dated May 30, 2001 8. School information dated July 12, 200 I 9. SWM adjustment approval for L02V0024 dated October 17, 2002 3B DOES addendum report with corrections and additional information regarding schools serving the property, prepared 02/27/03 Exhibit No. 4 Revised environmental checklist received October 14, 2002 Exhibit No. 5. Mitigated determination of non-significance dated December 23, 2002 Exhibit No. 6 Affidavit of posting indicating posting dates of October 3 and 4, 200 I. · Exhibit No. 7A Site plan (70 lot preliminary plat map) received March 26, 2002 7B Alternative site plan (46 lot preliminary plat map) received March 26, 2002 Exhibit No. 8 Assessors maps (4) for SE 14-23-05 revised 02/23/95, NE 14-23-05 revised 04/05/93, NW 14-23-05 revised 10/92, and SW 14-23-05 revised 07/07/97 Exhibit No. 9 Traffic impact analysis by Garry Struthers Associates, Inc. dated June 28, 2001 Exhibit No. 10 Traffic memo dated January 29, 2002, from Garry Struthers Assoc., Inc. Exhibit No. 11 Preliminary technical information report dated June, 2001, by Haozous Eng., P.S. Exhibit No. 12 Level 3 downstream drainage analysis by Haozous Eng., P.S., dated August 26, 2002 Exhibit No. 13 Addendum (6 pages plus cover) to the level-three study dated December 5, 2002 21 LOI POOi 6/LOITY 401-Evendcll Exhibit No. 14 Wetland evaluation and delineation report, wildlife habitat evaluation and compensatory wetland mitigation plan by Habitat Technologies, dated May 15, 2001. Exhibit No. 15 Addendum to wetland/stream/wildlife report dated October 28, 2002 Exhibit No. 16 City of Renton three-page certificate of sewer availability dated 6/15/01 Exhibit No. 17 Jaques, Fred & Helga email dated November I, 2001 Exhibit No. 18 Carlson, Marilynn letter dated November 7, 2001 Exhibit No. 19 Revised alternative R-4 plat density calculations received 3/26/02 Exhibit No. 20 Petition from Gwendolyn High (8 pg. + cover), received September 23, 2002 Exhibit No. 21 City of Renton letter received January 22, 2003, with attachments (4 pgs.) Exhibit No. 22 Letter from G. High & M. Rollinger for Citizens Alliance for a Responsible Evendell (CARE) dated April 5, 2002 with attachments (60 pgs. + cover) Exhibit No. 23 G. High and M. Rollinger, CARE petition to intervene filed on 2/18/03 Exhibit No. 24 DDES planning map (created 7/1/2003) prepared 2/20/2003 showing new development planned in the immediate vicinity Exhibit No. 25 Letter from Greg Zimmerman, City of Renton, dated March 05, 2003 (2/12/03 memo attached) Exhibit No. 26 Certificate of Transportation Concurrency received July 6, 2001 Exhibit No. 27 Topographic map provided by City of Renton (aerial photography taken Winter, 1996) subject property in conjunction with Highland Estates Exhibit No. 28 Article from King County Journal, "Give Us Some Space, Firefighters Say ... " 02/27/2003 Exhibit No. 29 Transportation service areas 2000 map-KCDDES, February, 2001 Exhibit No. 30 Community action strategies sub-area priority ranking map-KCDOT, February, 2001 Exhibit No. 31 Assessors map of East Renton/Briarwood area with coloring Exhibit No. 32 Proposed but not entered into the record -area map showing nesting sites Exhibit No. 33 Online permit details -DOES website printouts (18 pg) Exhibit No. 34 Notice of application for the Bales Annexation and pre-zone application, dated January 15, 2003 -City of Renton Exhibit No. 35 Letter from Scott D. Baker, Consulting Arborist dated 2/8/03 Exhibit No. 36 Tree retention/protection buffer site plan alternatives Exhibit No. 37 C.A.R.E. households list (2 pg) Exhibit No. 38 Letter from Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council dated March 5, 2003 Exhibit No. 39 Tree loss and possible ground water contamination depiction Exhibit No. 40 Sign-in and time donation sheet (3 pg) dated March 6, 2003 Exhibit No. 41 Transportation concurrency diagrams for 2001, 2002 & 2003 Exhibit No. 42 a Letter (2 pg) from Don & Janice Milbrath dated March 3, 2003 b Letter (2 pg) from Kristy J. Hill dated March 6, 2003 c Letter (2 pg) from Edward and June Hill dated March 6, 2003 d Letter (I pg) from Charles W. Scoby, Viola M. Scoby, and Geneva D. Scholes dated March I, 2003 e Letter ( I pg) from Laurie A. Hindes dated February 26, 2003 f Letter (2 pg) from Mark Costello dated March 4, 2003 g Letter (I pg) from Eloise and Claude Stchowiak dated March 6, 2003 h Letter (3 pg) from Bruce and Joyce Osgoodby dated Feb. 21, 2003, and March, 6, 2003 J Letter (I pg) from Richard Savage (undated) Exhibit No. 43 Letter (I pg) from Dan & Lynn Peterson, also signed by Fred & Helga Jaques (undated) Exhibit No. 44 a Letter (I pg) from John Nanney dated March 6, 2003 b Letter (I pg) from Linda Williams dated March 5, 2003 c Letter (I pg) from Rodney S. Stewart dated March 5, 2003 JI 22 LOJ POOJ 6/LOITY 401-Evendell d e f. Exhibit No. 45 a b C d e Letter ( I pg) from Edward A. Schultz dated March 4, 2003 Letter ( I pg) from Joseph Matsudaira dated March 5, 2003 Letter ( I pg) from Brenda Matsudaira dated March 5, 2003 Letter ( I pg) from Richard & Anita Oliphant dated March 5, 2003 Letter (2 pg) from Mark Costello dated March 4, 2003 Letter (2 pg) from Jeff & Karen Sidebotham (undated) Letter ( I pg) signed by Nancy & Edward Hilton dated March 6, 2003 Memo (4 pg) from Michael Rae Cooke dated March 4, 2003, with attached resident survey sheet, error notes, and April 3, 2002, memo and attachments (8 pg) to King County Surface Water and Land Management The following items were entered at the March IO, 2003, continued hearing: Exhibit No. 46 Exhibit No. 47 Exhibit No. 48 Exhibit No. 49 Exhibit No. 50 Exhibit No. 51 Exhibit No. 52 Exhibit No. 53 Exhibit No. 54 Exhibit No. 55 Exhibit No. 56 a b C d e f g h Exhibit No. 57 Exhibit No. 58 JNO:gao/cp LOJPOOJ6 LOJTY401 RPT Photos (9) provided by Anita Oliphant with commentary (undated) Letter (3 pg) from Bruce and Joyce Osgoody dated February 21, 2003 Letter ( I pg) from Marilynn Carlson dated March 9, 2003 Letter (2 pg) from Kristy Hill dated March 6, 2003 Letter ( I pg) from Marsha Rollinger (undated) Letter ( I pg) from Joseph Bostjancic dated March 5, 2003 Memo (I pg) from Nick Gillen dated March 7, 2003 Copy of table #3 from the 2002 Issaquah school plan showing "Projected Capacity to House Sudents" Memo (I pg) from Mark Heckert, Habitat Technologies, dated March IO, 2003 Gwendolyn High's testimony of March 6, 2003 with cover letter dated March I 0, 2003 noting correction Letters from: Donald & Diane Kezelle (2 pg) -undated Vanessa Burris ( I pg) Carolyn Ann Buckett (I pg) Ronda Bryant (3 pg) dated March I 0, 2003 Michael Rae Cooke (7 pg) dated 3/8/02 Marsha Rollinger (] pg) undated Sally Nipert (I pg) dated March 6, 2003 Shirley Day ( I pg) dated March 6, 2003 Bill and Donna Mokin (2 pg) dated March 6, 2003 Photos of hawk (2) ODES revised recommendation/additional conditions dated 3/10/03 23 l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IO ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 r,, • rf; ~·-~: 2 : (! .".'\~ ,·-. ·-' - .,.'1 / :'' .\ ..... /.1_ BEFORE THE KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Re: Zone Reclassification and Preliminary Plat NO. L01P0016 & L01TY401 (Prop. Ord. Application for Plat of EVENDELL No. 2003-0031 & 2003-0032) ------------------' STATEMENT OF APPEAL This Appeal Statement is submitted on behalf of the applicant, U.S.· Land Development Association/Centurion ("U.S. Land"). I. INTRODUCTION U.S. Land submitted dual, alternate applications for development of a residential subdivision known as Evendell. The first application was for a reclassification/rezone from R-4 to R-6 and a 70 unit residential subdivision. The site for the 70 unit subdivision is fu ~ . located between 160 Avenue S.E. and 156 Avenue S.E., bordered on the north by art unopened right-of-way for S.E. 136th Street. Exhibit 3 in Record, R-6 -70 lot preliminary STATEMENTOFAPPEAL-1 of 17 JOIINS MONROE MITSUNAGA PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 114'" Ave. SE, Suite 102 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Tel: (425) 451 2812 / Fax (425) 451 2818 $J l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 plat map. The second application was for a 46 unit residential subdivision, assuming that the rezone was not approved. The site for the 46 unit subdivision is located between 160th Avenue S.E. and 158th Avenue S.E., bordered on the north by the unopened right-of-way for S.E. 136th Street, and bordered on the west by private property (158th Avenue S.E. ends in a '"f" at its intersection with the unopened right-of-way for S.E. 136th Street). Exhibit 3, R-4 - 46 lot preliminary plat map. Both applications were complete as of September 20, 2001. Running along the north boundary of the site is the unopened and unimproved right- of-way for S.E. 136th Street, between 156th and 160th Avenues S.E. Exhibit 3, preliminary plat maps. Access to the Evendell Plat does not require that SE 136th be opened or improved because adequate access to the plat is provided by other streets. Opening SE 136th would provide improved access to other properties in the area, but would provide no benefit to the Evendell Plat. Nevertheless, during the plat review process, U.S. Land volunteered to dedicate additional right-of-way and construct improvements to the unopened portion of S.E. 136th Street as part of its 70 home application if and only if the rezone and 70 lot plat were approved. U.S. Land did not volunteer to open and construct S.E. 136th Street as part of the 46 home application since the cost to do so for the smaller subdivision would be prohibitive and would make that smaller project infeasible. DOES staff issued a recommendation in favor of the rezone and 70-unit subdivision. DDES reviewed the applications and determined that the rezone and 70 lot plat complied with applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and code requirements. DDES also found that US Land's offer to open S.E. 136th Street would provide improved access to other STATEMENT OP APPEAL-2 of J7 JOHNS MONROE MITSUNAGA PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 1141b Ave. SE, Suite 102 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Tel: (425) 451 2812 / Fax (425) 451 2818 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 properties in the area and was in the public interest. Finally, DDES found that U.S. Land's proposed construction of a sewer lift station with capacity in excess of that needed just for the proposed plat would provide a general public benefit to the area surrounding the site. See Exhibit 3 -Staff Report, generally. DDES also later provided an addendum report concerning its proposed conditions for the 46 Jot subdivision. Exhibits 3, 58. DDES did not change its recommendation to reclassify the property to R-6 and approve the 70 Jot subdivision. The Hearing Examiner pro tern held a public hearing on March 6, 2003. The Hearing Examiner issued a Report on March 28, 2003, recommending denial of the rezone and 70 unit subdivision application, and granting approval of the 46 unit subdivision. However, the Examiner also required that US Land ·dedicate and construct improvements to the unopened S.E. 136th Street even though those improvements are not related to the impacts of the 46 lot plat and US Land's voluntary offer to build this road applied only if the rezone and 70 lot plat were approved. IL APPEAL ARGUMENT A. The Hearing Examiner Erroneously Recommended Denial of the Reclassification. In granting a rezone/reclassification, KCC 20.24.190 (D) requires that certain conditions exist. In this fase, U.S. Land was required to, and did, demonstrate the following: l. Since the last previous area zoning or shoreline environment designation of the subject property, authorized public improvements, pennitted private development or other conditions or circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone substantial and material change not anticipated or STATEMENTOFAPPEAL-3 of 17 JOHNS MONROE MITSUNAGA PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 l 14ili Ave. SE, Suite 102 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Tel: (425)4512812/ Fax(425)45128J~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 contemplated in the subarea plan or area zoning; 2. The impacts from the changed conditions or circumstances affect the subject property in a manner and to a degree different than other properties in the vicinity such that area rezoning or redesignation is not appropriate; For the purposes of this subsection, "changed conditions or circumstances" does not include actions taken by the current or former property owners to facilitate a more intense development of the property including but not limited to changing tax limitations, adjusting property lines, extending services, or changing property ownership; 3 .... 4. For proposals to increase urban residential density, that the proposal meets the criteria in Comprehensive Plan policies U-118 through U-123; and 5. The requested reclassification or redesignation is in the public interest. KCC 20.24.190 (emphasis added). DDES's Staff Report and the evidence submitted during the public hearing demonstrated that the request for reclassification complies with these conditions. However, the Hearing Examiner erroneously held that U.S. Land failed the changed circumstance requirement of KCC 20.24.190(0) and recommended denial of the reclassification based on this erroneous conclusion. i. Changed Conditions or Circumstances. DDES staff and U.S. Land both testified that KCC 20.24.190(0) was met because several changed circumstances and conditions affecting the site have occurred since the last area rezone which were clearly not contemplated by that rezone. This site was last rezoned in 1995 when the County adopted its Comprehensive Plan and zoning scheme under the Growth Management Act. At that time, the site was STATEMENTOFAPPEAL-40f 17 JOHNS MONROE MITSUNAGA PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 114'" Ave. SE. Suite 102 Bellevue. Washington 98004 Tel: (425) 451 2812 / Fax (425) 451 2818 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 . 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 rezoned from SR-15,000 to R-4. Since that rezone, the following changed conditions and circumstances have taken place: 0 This Council has adopted significant amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, including a new 2000 Comprehensive Plan. o All urban development must now be served by sewer. The requirement that all urban sites be served by sewer was not contemplated at the time of the rezone. Instead, at the time the site was rezoned to R-4, the County still allowed fo{ lots to be served by septic systems. As of the 2000 Comprehensive Plan, the site must now be served by sewer. Staff Report, 0 0 0 pg. 11. Sewer was not available to serve the subject site at the time of the 1995 rezone. Since then, sewer service has become available. The County's Buildable Lands Analysis indicates that there is a significant shortage of buildable land for detached single family housing. The Inventory indicates that in order to meet 2012 Population Projections, 52% of the new housing in King County will have to be condominiums in the Seattle-Shoreline area. While one can argue about whether this is realistic, it nevertheless demonstrates that there is a significant shortage of area for detached single family housing. Increases in density have been approved and housing constructed in the immediate vicinity of the Evendell plat within the urban growth area since STATEMENTOFAPPEAL-5 of 17 JOHNS MONROE MITSUNAGA PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 114'' Ave. SE, Suite 102 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Tel: (425) 451 2812 / Fax (425) 451 2J l. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 0 0 0 1995. Specifically, on June 11, 2001, the County approved a reclassification from R-4 to R-8 for the plat of Highland Estates, located within 700 to 900 feet of the subject site. Highland Estates has been developed at an average density of 6.92 units per acre. The Highland Estates site-specific rezone in 2001 was not contemplated by the County's 1995 area-wide rezone. Highland Estates is served by sewer. The City of Renton recently annexed a portion of the East Renton Potential Annexation Area. Since the annexation, the Maplewood Estates subdivision has been rezoned and developed under R-8 zoning, which was not contemplated in the 1995 Comprehensive Plan. Reclassification Application, pg. 9; Staff Report, pg. 11. This subdivision is served by sewer. Staff Report, pg. 11. The City of Renton concurs that the R-6 density for the Evendell site is consistent with its Comprehensive Plan. Traffic in the area has increased dramatically since 1995, such that the opening and construction of S.E. 1361h Street would be of significant value to the area. Instead of considering all the above changed circumstances and conditions, the Hearing Examiner focused only on the properties immediately adjacent to the subject site and found that since they had not been rezoned or developed, no changed circumstances had occurred. Hearing Examiner Report and Recommendation ("Recommendation"), pg. STATEMENTOFAPPEAL-6 Of 17 JOHNS MONROE MITSUNAGA PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 I 14" Ave. SE, Suite 102 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Tel: (425)4512812/ Fax(425)4512818 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 8, Finding 12. This conclusion is erroneous because it fails to consider other properties in the area which have been rezoned and developed and the fact that the properties which are immediately adjacent to the Evendell site have not yet developed at urban densities because sewer service was unavailable until very recently. Staff Report, pg. 13. In addition, the Hearing Examiner's focus is inappropriate under the current land use laws and regulations for the subject site. The County has already detennined that this area is to be developed at urban densities. Further, the Washington State Supreme Court has already addressed the argument that a rezone should be denied because the adjacent properties have not yet changed or re-developed. SORE v. Snohomish County, 99 W.2d 363 (1983). The Supreme Court held that a rezone cannot be denied simply because adjacent properties have not yet been physically developed because, if that were the law, no new development would ever occur, nor would a rezone ever be possible. See, SORE, 99 Wn.2d at 370-371. U.S. Land has demonstrated extensive and significant changed circumstances and conditions which affect the property. This Council should reject the Hearing Examiner's recommendation and grant the reclassification from R-4 to R-6. ii. Impacts from the changed conditions and circumstances affect the subject site differently than other properties in the vicinity. The impacts from the changed conditions and circumstances affect the subject site differently than other properties in the vicinity. This site is much larger with more development potential than other sites in the vicinity. The extension of sewer availability STATEMENTOFAPPEAL-7 of 17 JOHNS MONROE MITSUNAGA PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 l 14~ Ave. SE, Suite 102 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Tel: (425) 451 2812 / Fax (425) 451~,. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 has a pivotal effect on the achievable density particularly for larger sites. Therefore, the extension of sewer has a particularly significant impact on this site due to its size, as opposed to other smaller parcels in the vicinity. Aside from the obvious fact that this rezone and plat is an opportunity to provide additional residential capacity within the Urban Growth Area, as required by the Growth Management Act, the rezone and plat is also an opportunity to take advantage of the size of the project because a 70 lot project will support the construction of the sewer lift station and improvements to 136th Street, which will provide benefits and urban services to this portion of the UGA, where the absence of such services has previously prevented its development at urban levels. Finally, the location of this site is unique in having the potential to open S.E. 136th Street to create an east-west connector needed at the present time for overall neighborhood circulation due to growth in the other parts of the area. iii. The reclassification is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policies U-118 through U-123 as well as other Policies. As is discussed in detail in the Staff Report, this reclassification complies with Comprehensive Plan Policies U-118 through U-123, as well as with Policy U-114. 0 0 Policies U-119, addressing densities of one dwelling unit per acre, and U-123, addressing the Sea-Tac Airport Noise Remedy Area, do not apply to this reclassification. Policy U-118 requires a minimum density of four dwelling 'units per acre. The ST A TEMENT OF APPEAL -8 of J 7 JOHNS MONROE MITSUNAGA PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 114" Ave. SE, Suite 102 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Tel: (425) 451 2812 / Fax (425) 451 2818 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 0 reclassification clearly complies with this policy. Policy U-120 provides that zoning changes to increase densities must comply with the following: a. The development will be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhood; The surrounding neighborhood is transitioning from rural to urban as is evidenced by both the suburban/rural preexisting development and the new Highland Estates and Maplewood Ridge plats, at R-8 densities. Staff Report, pg. 9. Further, the Staff Report indicates that DOES has held preapplication meetings regarding three other sites in the vicinity, all seeking to continue the pattern of urban development of this area. Staff Report, pg. 3. The only Plan Policy that the Hearing Examiner claims is not consistent with the proposed rezone and plat is this portion of Policy U-120 which encourages compatibility with neighborhoods in which the site is located. The Examiner's decision was based on his belief that this proposed development is incompatible with the immediately adjacent properties, which are not presently developed at urban densities. However, the Growth Management Act, chapter 36.70A RCW, requires the County to develop this site at urban densities. Further, staff specifically addressed the Hearing Examiner's concern by ex.plaining that "[n]earby properties until recently did not have all urban services available (such as sewer) and therefore these properties have developed at only lower densities (generally \/2 acres lots and greater)." Staff Report, pg. 13. STATEMENT OF APPEAL· 9 Of 17 JOHNS MONROE MITSUNAGA PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 114th Ave. SE. Suite 102 Bellevue. Washington 98004 Tel: (425) 451 2812/ Fax (425) 451 2818 ~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 If one accepts the Examiner's logic, it means that no property may be developed at the urban densities set by the Comprehensive Plan if an adjacent site is undeveloped or underdeveloped. This makes no sense and would be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and GMA. The Examiner's recommendation should be rejected. b. Urban public facilities and services are adequate, consistent with adopted levels of service and meet GMA concurrency requirements, including King County transportation concurrency standards; The Staff Report indicates that urban services are available. Staff Report, pg. 9. In fact, with the reclassification, urban services will be enhanced by U.S. Land's dedication and construction of the unopened portion of S.E. 136th Street and construction of the sewer lift station needed to bring sanitary sewer service to this area. c. The proposed density change will not increase unmitigated adverse impacts on environmentally sensitive areas, either on site or in the vicinity of the proposed development; A Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance was issued for the reclassification and subdivision. A Class II on-site wetland is protected pursuant to the County's sensitive areas regulations in chapter 21A.24 KCC. Staff Report, pg. 9. d. The proposed density increase will be consistent with or contribute to achieving the goals and policies of this Comprehensive Plan, and subarea plan, if applicable; and The proposed density mcrease from R-4 to R-6 is within the density range contemplated by the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation of 4-12 dwelling units per acre for the subject·site. Staff Report, pg. 9. STATEMENTOFAPPEAL-10 of 17 JOHNS MONROE MITSUNAGA PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 I 14" Ave. SE, Suite 102 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Tel: (425) 451 2812 / Fax (425) 451 2818 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 0 0 e. The proposal is consistent with the adopted city comprehensive plan for the Potential Annexation Area where the rezone is located if the proposed density exceeds eight dwelling units per acre. If the city is not planning for urban densities and efficient land use patterns consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies, then this paragraph shall not apply. The reclassification and 70 unit subdivision is consistent with Renton's Comprehensive Plan, which sets a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per acre. Staff Report, pg. 9. Policy U-122 provides the following: King County supports increases in urban residential density through a rezone or a proposal to increase density through the density transfer or density incentive programs when the proposal will help resolve traffic, sewer, water, parks or open space deficiencies in the immediate neighborhood. Clearly, U.S. Land's proposed reclassification implements Policy U-122 in . two ways. First, by helping to resolve a traffic circulation problem which affects other properties in the area by opening. Second, by constructing a new and needed east-west connector road as well as providing a sewer lift station that will provide sewer for up to 37 additional acres to the south and east zoned for urban densities. Upon extension of sewer for this subdivision under the reclassification, additional areas to the north will also be able to connect to the sewer main by gravity feed. In addition, this reclassification also implements Comprehensive Plan Policy U-.114, which provides the following: King County shall seek to achieve through future planning efforts over the next twenty years, an average zoning density of at least seven to eight homes per acre in the Urban Growth Area through a mix of densities and housing types. A lower STATEMENTOFAPPEAL-11 Of 17 JOHNS MONROE MITSUNAGA PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 114"' Ave. SE, Suite 102 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Tel: (425) 4512812/ Fax (425) 451 2818 ~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 density zone may be used to recognize existing subdivisions with little or no opportunity for infill or redevelopment. The reclassification from R-4 to R-6 more closely conforms to the County's goal providing an average zoning of seven to eight homes per acre. The subject site is a prime opportunity for urban infill, which is exactly the situation in which Policy U-114 contemplates densities in the range of R-6 to R-8. Leaving the property as R-4 violates Policy U-114. U.S. Land has demonstrated that the proposed reclassification implements all applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies as required by KCC 20.24.190 (4). This Council should decline to follow the Hearing Examiner's recommendation and instead grant the reclassification. iv. The reclassification is in the public interest. The Hearing Examiner did not make any conclusions · as to whether this reclassification would be in the public interest. However, as shown above, by providing necessary urban services and by its compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Policies, this reclassification is very much in the public interest. In addition, this reclassification is in the public interest for the following reasons: 0 0 The reclassification is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation for the site. Staff Report, pg. 9. The reclassification will result in a needed east-west connector road for increased STATEMENTOFAPPEAL-12 of 17 JOHNS MONROE MITSUNAGA PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 114"' Ave. SE, Suite 102 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Tel: (425) 451 2812 / Fax (425) 451 2818 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 0 0 traffic circulation for the existing neighborhood. Staff specifically noted that considering "recent rulings of the examiner relative to providing neighborhood circulation within neighborhoods (see L99P3013) it is unlikely that another east- west connection would be built along this corridor as a condition of a future plat." Staff Report, pg. 14. U.S. Land's construction of the sewer lift station will extend the potential sewer service area to the north and east. Staff Report, pg. 14. This new sewer service area will result in greater compliance with the Comprehensive Plan mandate to provide sewer service within the urban growth· area, as well as increase overall compliance with the Growth Management Act. The reclassification will help fo mitigate the housing shortage as has been evidenced in the County's buildable lands review process. B. The Hearing Examiner's Conditioning of the 46 Lot Subdivision on Dedication and Construction of S.E. 136th Street Violated U.S. Land's Constitutional Rights to Substantive Due Process and Freedom From Unconstitutional Takings. The Hearing Examiner acknowledged that U.S. Land had only volunteered to dedicate land and construct improvements to open S.E. 136th Street as part of the reclassification and 70 home subdivision. However, without pointing to any justification in the record, the Hearing Examiner denied the reclassification and required U.S. Land to build S.E. 136th Street as a condition of the smaller 46 home subdivision. U.S. Land respectfully requests that even if this Council denies the reclassification, that this Council reverse the Hearing Examiner's condition upon the 46 home subdivision which would STATEMENTOFAPPEAL-J3 Of )7 JOHNS MONROE MITSUNAGA PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 114" Ave. SE, Suite 102 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Tel:(425)4512812/ Fax(425)4512818 _,,,/ . ¥6 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IO 11 12 13 14 15 .16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 require it to dedicate and construct S.E. I36'h Street. This condition on the 46 lot plat is an unconstitutional taking, a violation of U.S. Land's rights to substantive due process, and violation of RCW 82.02.020. In order to impose a condition upon development, either by requiring dedication of land, exaction of fees, or a requirement to construct improvements, the County must demonstrate (1) that the condition alleviates an impact the development has upon the public interest (the "nexus" rule), and (2) proportionality between the development's impact and the condition that the County wishes to impose (the "rough proportionality" rule). Benchmark v. City of Battleground, 146 Wn.2d 685, (2000); Burton v. Clark County, 91 Wn. App. 505 (1998); Unlimited v. Kitsap County, 50 Wn. App. 723 (1988); Luxembourg Group, Inc. v. Snohomish County, 76 Wn. App. 502 (1995) .. Specifically, a condition of approval to make physical improvements to a road bordering a subdivision that is not needed for access, and which is not significantly impacted by any increase in traffic volume from the future residents of the subdivision, is an unconstitutional takings . Benchmark, 103 Wn. App. 721; Benchmark, 146 Wn.2d 685. RCW 82.02.020 provides that a county can only require dedications of land (or. . require construction of physical improvements including urban services) for which the county "can demonstrate are reasonably necessary as a direct result of the proposed development or plat to which the dedication of land or easement is to apply." Under RCW 82.02.020, the County has the burden to demonstrate the legality of the permit condition. Accordingly, the Hearing Examiner's decision was required to demonstrate STATEMENTOFAPPEAL-14 of 17 JOHNS MONROE MITSUNAGA PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 114'" Ave. SE, Suite 102 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Tel: (425) 451 2812 / Fax (425) 451 2818 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 how the dedication and construction of S.E. 136th Street is necessary as a direct result of the proposed development. The Hearing Examiner's decision fails to point to anything in the record that demonstrates that the exaction to dedicate and construct S.E. 136th Street which is related to the impacts of the 46 lot plat application. Nothing in the record supports this conclusion. The only comment the Hearing Examiner had regarding traffic circulation was whether the intersection of 160th Avenue S.E. and S.E. 128th Street.would meet level of service standards during the AM peak hour if 160th Avenue S.E. were the only route to S.E. 128th Street. In fact, County regulations provide that level of service analysis be performed based on PM peak hour traffic counts. KCC 14.70.210 (V). In this case, the PM peak hour traffic counts for this project were satisfactory and permit the 70 home subdivision without construction of S.E. 136th Street. Exhibit 9 (Traffic impact analysis); Exhibit 10 (traffic memo); Exhibit 26 (Certificate of Transportation Concurrency). The Hearing Examiner erroneously stated that the Staff Report supported construction of S.E. 136th Street as a condition of approval for the 46 home subdivision. Recommendation, pg. 7, Finding 7. In fact, the staff report recommending construction of S.E. 136th Street was clearly tied to staffs recommendation to approve the reclassification and 70 home subdivision. In its addendum report regarding the 46 lot subdivision, staff did suggest as a condition, dedication of 18 feet of right-of-way for S.E. 136th Street. However, staffs condition regarding the 46 lot subdivision was not a STATEMENTOFAPPEAL-15 of 17 JOHNS MONROE MITSUNAGA PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 114" Ave. SE, Suite 102 Bellevue. Washington 98004 Tel: (425) 451 2812 / Fax (425) 451 281~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 recommendation per se, since staff supported the reclassification as opposed to the 46 home subdivision. Staff did not recommend approval of the 46 home subdivision with construction of S.E. 136th Street; instead, staff recommended the reclassification. Staff clearly stated with respect to S.E. 136th Street that "without the rezone and 70-lot plat approval, this connection will unlikely ever be built unless the county chooses to make it a priority as part of the capital improvement program." Staff Report, pg. 14. Staff also did not make any findings that that the proposed 70 or 46 home subdivision directly resulted in a need to open and construct S.E. 136th Street. DDES. staff clearly understood that U.S. Land had volunteered to dedicate and construct S.E. 136th Street as part of the reclassification and 70 home subdivision. Staff Report, pg. 14. The Evendell subdivision will not have an impact that would justify requiring U.S. Land to dedicate land and open and construct S.E. 136th Street. Instead, U.S. Land demonstrated that all streets serving the development have sufficient capacity to accommodate the Evendell subdivision at either 46 or 70 units. Without any support for this unconstitutional exaction, the Hearing Examiner's condition that U.S. Land dedicate and construct S.E. 136th Street must be reversed. Specifically, Hearing Examiner's conclusions 8, 9, and 14 (b) on pages 14-16, must be reversed. STATEMENT OF APPEAL-16 of 17 JOHNS MONROE MITSUNAGA PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 114"' Ave. SE, Suite 102 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Tel: (425) 451 2812 / Fax (425) 451 2818 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 III. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, the staff report, and the record, U.S. Land respectfully requests this Council to reclassify the subject site, Evendell, from R-4 to R-6 and approve the preliminary plat for 70 homes. DATEDthis \~~dayof_AR""fu.0.1._I ______ ,2003. 2101-1 Statement of Appeal 4-18-03 STATEMENTOFAPPEAL-17 of 17 JOHNS MONROE MITSUNAGA, PLLC By:+) 'Ctl·, Robert D. Johns, WSBA #7086 Duana Kolouskovii, WSBA #27532 Attorneys for U.S. Land Development JOHNS MONROE MITSUNAGA PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 114'" Ave. SE, Suite 102 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Tel:(425)4512812/ Fax(425)4512818~f C.A.R.E. Response: Statement of Appeal Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications· L01P0016 and L01TY401 This Response to the Statement.of Appeal submitted on behalf of the Evendell applicants has been compiled from the notes, letters, surveys and conversations of the members of the community surrounding the subject parcel of these applications. The materials contained in it have been prepared and delivered by Gwendolyn High and Marsha . Rollinger. The subjects covered are of the highest concern of all citizens involved. We trust that these matters will be considered by the responsible parties with the same level of care we have expended in bringing them to your attention. We respectfully request that opportunity for oral argument be granted by King County Council so that we may be allowed to personally present our case, provide clarification on any point and respond to any additional questions the Council may have. · Gwendolyn High Marsha Rollinger Highlands Neighbors@hotmail.com 425.917.0117 425.277.0245 Thank you for your time and attention. Citizens Alliance for a Responsible Evendell 13405 1581 " Avenue SE Renton WA 98059 15646 SE 138'" Place Renton WA 98059 A,e/~+-k'gnt _5.23_()5 Gwendolyn High ' . .,.. l{.MOAJ)~ ~ pt.A Marsha Rollinger r·,.) w C.A.R.E. Response: Statement of Appeal . Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications -L01P0016 and L01TY401 Who We Are Since November 2001, Gwendolyn High and Marsha Rollinger have been meeting with and recording the concerns of the neighbors who will be most impacted by the subject applications. We have had four meetings, six newsletters, and numerous email discussions. Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Evendell represents over 80 households and over 150 individuals whose residencies in our community range from one year to more than sixty years. Their contact information is recorded in the official record of these applications. Ms. Rollinger is an accomplished graphic designer and commercial artist. Ms. High is a data analyst, programmer and information technology project manager. She is also the district representative for this neighborhood on the Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council, where she serves as Secretary and Transportation Representative. In the later capacity she has served since October 2002 as the only citizen representative on the King County Transportation Concurrency Advisory Committee. What We Have Accomplished On April s'", 2002, we delivered our first Response lo these applications. From !he data reported in that submission and other communications with DDES staff, our concerns over anticipated drainage impacts were further investigated and found to be factual. The applicant was required to perform a Level Ill Downstream Analysis and additional drainage mitigation was subsequently required. On March 6th we attended the Public Hearing. Ms. Rollinger and Ms. High acted as ln!erveners on behalf of the residents of our community. More than sixty citizens sacrificed !heir entire day to join together and speak out against the Evendell proposal. There were so many people and so much testimony that the Hearing Examiner had to grant an extension. On the 10th of March, we came back and delivered our closing arguments. In the Report and Recommendation to the King County Council issued March 28th 2003, Hearing Examiner Pro Tern James O'Conner recommended !hat the application for Zone Reclassification be denied. What We Hope To Achieve Zone Reclassification for the proposed Evendell development is wrong. We support the findings of Hearing Examiner O'Conner and urge the King County Council to follow his recommendations. The balance of this document rebuts the assertions presented by the applicant in !heir Statement of Appeal. C.A.R.E. Response: Statement of Appeal . Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications-L01P001·s and L01TY401 Response to Statement of Appeal Re: Zone Reclassification and Preliminary Application for Plat of EVENDELL Page 5 Lines 3 and 4 Neither the 1994 Comprehensive Plan nor 1995 Area Zoning are the "last previous" change to King County Zoning designations. Thus, references to these changes are irrelevant. The review and subsequent adoption of the 2000 Comprehensive Plan Update offered the express opportunity, indeed the legislative obligation, to make any necessary modifications to the area zoning. No such change was deemed appropriate, no change was proposed and none was adopted. Page 5 Lines 6 though 14 The review and subsequent adoption of the 2000 Comprehensive Plan Update was the "last previous" review and change of development and zoning conditions. With this update, sewer is required for all new urban development in the Newcastle Planning Area. Thus, there has been no change to development conditions and this argument is erroneous. Page 5 Lines 15 though 22 The King County Buildable Lands Evaluation Report 2002, published in September 2002, has no statement to support the applicant's assertion. In fact, the statement is untrue in several regards. King County's Buildable Lands report does not provide specific analysis of single family and multifamily capacity except on pages 28 to 30 of the published Report. Tables and text on page 28 indicate clearly that King County has capacity for nearly 80,000 housing units on single family zoned land. There is additional single family capacity in mixed-use zones in many jurisdictions. The more conservative 80,000 units capacity constitutes two-thirds of the capacity required (120,900 units) to meet the County's 2012 projections. Past development activity demonstrates that less than 50% of new construction in recent years has been single family, and we fully expect continuation of a 50-50 split -or more multifamily --in coming years in King County as a whole. The 52% statement is wrong and puzzling. About 40% of the Countywide capacity of 263,000 new units is in the form of multifamily and mixed use in the Seattle-Shoreline area. That includes apartments as well as condominiums. But that represents an opportunity, not a requirement. Even if none of Seattle's multifamily capacity were used (extremely unlikely), the remaining subareas have sufficient capacity to accommodate the entire growth forecast -without a single change in zoning anywhere in the County at any time within the twenty year planning period. There is single family and multifamily capacity in every subarea of King County; the Buildable Lands report clearly demonstrates that there is both sufficient capacity in the whole County and in each subarea to accommodate the growth expected to 2012 and well beyond. On page 183 of the Buildable Lands Evaluation Report 2002, the Residential Capacity Analysis for the South County urban unincorporated area, in which the proposed Evendell site is located, states: "The South County Urban Unincorporated Area has a total residential capacity of 17,283 units. Its remaining target to 2012 is 4,935 households. This amounts to a surplus capacity of 12,384 units greater than its target. It has achieved 53% of its target in the first eight years of the twenty year planning period." The data clearly shows that we have much more than sufficient capacity in this area to meet all mandated targets, and that growth already achieved has significantly exceeded planned rates. The infrastructure improvements that are also mandated to meet such growth have, unfortunately, not kept pace. Concurrency policy demands that new growth must only be allowed as infrastructure is constructed to accommodate it. Changes to increase the zoned density will be directly in violation of concurrency policies, and place an unfair burden on the citizens of the South County unincorporated area. -------------------------------------- C.A.R.E. Response: Statement of Appeal Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications -L01P0016 and L01TY401 Page 5 Line 23 though Page 6 Line 7 The Hearing Examiner"s conclusion thoroughly disputes the assertion of the applicant that the Highlands Estates zoning was given inadequate consideration. The text of that conclusion follows: "Reclassification of the Highlands Estates property is distinguished from this application by the facts of that case, particularly its location adjacent to the development of 4,500 square of lots in the City of Renton, the interconnection and overlapping of the road improvements necessary to the development of Maplewood and Highland Estates, and the greater separation of Highlands Estates from fully developed properties on larger lots. Page 6 Lines 8 though 14 The zoning for Maplewood Estates was adopted with annexation by the City of Renton with Ordinance 4776 on April 12, 1999. The King County 2000 Comprehensive Plan Update was adopted February 12, 2001. The review and subsequent adoption of the 2000 Comprehensive Plan Update offered the express opportunity, indeed the legislative obligation, to make any necessary modifications to the area zoning. No such change was deemed appropriate, no change was proposed and none was adopted. Renton is not planning to increase the zoning density of this area. Notice of a proposed annexation between the subject parcels and the City Limits of Renton and east of Maplewood Estates, has recently been issued. The proposed annexation will maintain zoning directly comparable to the R-4 designation presently in force. This shows Renton's intent for the long term development of this area. See Exhibit #34 in Record. Page 6 Lines 15 and 16 The proposed reclassification is barely within the very high end limit of that compatible with the Renton Comprehensive Plan. Renton anticipates a maximum density of R--8. However, City of Renton has significantly different definitions of "dwellings per acre." Renton has a net area dwellings per acre system, as contrasts with King County's gross area dwellings per acre. In King County, if a 10 acre parcel is zoned R-4, has a 2 acre wetland and the plat will require 2 acres of roads -40 units can be allowed. Under Renton standards, sensitive areas and roads are removed from the equation first and only 30 units could be allowed on that same parcel. Thus, R-6 under King County is not directly comparable to R-6 under Renton. In addition, the City of Renton has no minimum density requirement. In the Comprehensive Plans of both King County and of the City of Renton, there is a defined range of densities designated as Urban. Where circumstances in a specific area such as ours make higher density inappropriate, this provision for the allowance of lower density makes it not only possible, but necessary to allow that lower density to be maintained. Page 6 Lines 17 through 19 The Statement of Appeal offers only conjecture as to the efficacy of potential improvements to traffic flow. Further, their reference to the need for this new connection to improve neighborhood circulation "due to grow1h in other parts of the area" is in error. All recent development in the area which is now contributing traffic to the local system has been to the west, inside the Renton City Limits. No traffic from the new development flows to the east anywhere near the proposed S.E. 1361 h corridor. According to the Traffic Analysis submitted for the Evendell applications, the vast majority of all traffic expected to utilize the opened S.E. 136th will be from the Evendell plat itself and will travel eastbound on that route. The applicant asserts that changes in traffic patterns have not been considered in the most recent updates to the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning for this area. Changes in traffic and transportation capacity are reviewed at least annually under the Transportation Concurrency Policies. The current conditions are definitely included in the consideration at each Comprehensive Plan update cycle. • As previously testified in the Public Hearing, the Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council, in response to persistent public demand, has submitted repeated requests to KCDOT for North/South connectivity through our community. There is not a single request for EastNVest connectivity through our area in the entire archive of the Four Creeks UAC. We do not need it, and the opening of S.E. 1361" will not provide it. C.A.R.E. Response: Statement of Appeal Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications -L01P0016 and L01TY401 In fact, the opening of S.E. 136th onto 156th Ave S.E. will exacerbate existing traffic problems on that arterial. A better option for road improvement would be the addition of a traffic light and turn lanes at 160th Ave. S.E and S.E. 128th Ave. 128th is a four lane arterial as opposed to 156th which is a two lane arterial, a designated life Line Route and the only North/South access for the entire plateau. Page 6 Line 20 though Page 7 Line 4 The requirement of sewer has been in place for all developments inside the Urban Growth Boundary since the 2000 Comprehensive Plan Update. The availability of sewer to this parcel is still theoretical. There is no service to this site to date. The property owners·of the majority of parcels located between the Evendell site and the location of current sewer service are in the Record. Particularly, the Kezeles, the Milbraths, and the Hagermans have no interest or intention of ever redeveloping their properties to the densities proposed. Page 6 Lines 5 through 15 In every Code and Policy citation presented by DOES staff and the applicant, a range of density has been indicated as allowable. 2000 King County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates this area as "Urban Residential, 4-12 dwellings per acre". R-4 is within this allowable range. "U-114 King County shall seek to achieve through future planning efforts over the next twenty years, an average zoning density of at least seven to eight homes per acre in the Urban Growth Area through a mix of densities and housing types. A lower density zone may be used to recognize existing subdivisions with little or no opportunity for infill or redevelopment.· To achieve an average density within the Urban Zone, county wide, of seven to eight houses per acre, there must be areas with density lower than that average. Where circumstances in a specific area such as ours make higher density inappropriate, this provision for the allowance of lower density makes it not only possible, but necessary to allow that lower density to be maintained. "U-118 King County should apply minimum density requirements to all urban residential zones of four or more homes per acre, except under limited circumstances .. ." The R-4 alternative Plat proposal meets the minimum density requirement. The Hearing Examiner is quite correct in his conclusion that the applicant has failed to prove changed circumstances on any point. This Council must uphold the recommendations of the Hearing Examiner and deny the application for Zone Reclassification. Page 7 Line 19 though Page 8 Line 3 The Statement of Appeal states that the availability of sewer "has a pivotal effect on the achievable density particularly for larger sites." This is an erroneous statement. The requirement of sewer has been in place for all developments inside the Urban Growth Boundary since the 2000 Comprehensive Plan Update. This property is not affected any differently than any other property in the vicin1ty. Page 8 Lines 4 through 11 Any development of the proposed site at urban densities, which includes the current designation of R-4, will contribute to the addition of residential capacity within the Urban Growth Boundary as required by the Growth Management Act. A sewer lift station must be constructed regardless of the density to be developed on this parcel. These conditions apply to every property in the vicinity, thus, this parcel has no unique obligation in the regard of sewer availability. C.A.R.E. Response: Statement of Appeal Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications -L01P0016 and L01TY401 Page 8 Lines 12 through 15 The Statement of Appeal offers only conjecture as to the efficacy of potential improvements to traffic flow. Further, their reference to the need for this new connection to improve neighborhood circulation "due to growth in other parts of the area" is in error. All recent development in the area which is now contributing traffic to the local system has been to the west, inside the Renton City Limits. No traffic from the new development flows to the east anywhere near the proposed S.E. 1361 " corridor. According to the Traffic Analysis submitted for the Evendell applications, the vast majority of all traffic expected to utilize the opened S.E. 136th will be from the Evendell plat itself and will travel eastbound on that route. Page 8 Line 23 though Page 9 Line 1 The R-4 alternative Plat proposal meets the minimum density requirement as stated in U-118 Page 9 Lines 2 through 12 The various components of King County's Comprehensive Plan Policies must be balanced concurrently. Comprehensive Plan Policy U-114 states that "A lower density zone may be used to recognize existing subdivisions ... " The subdivision adjacent to the south west section of the proposal parcel is fully developed at R-4 density. Likewise, subdivisions adjacent on the north east corner have been developed at R-4 density. In fact, there are no developments developed at density higher than R-4 from 1561 " Ave. S.E. all the way east to Issaquah. See Exhibit #31 in Record. Page 9 Line 14 The assertion that Policy U-120 "encourages compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods" is erroneous. U120 states: "King County shall not approve proposed zoning changes to increase density within the Urban Area unless: a. The development will be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhood; • The Policy requires that any zone reclassification must be compatible in both character and scale. This area may now be zoned Urban, but there are still such rural infrastructural configurations as mailboxes at the street -and worse -along only a single side of arterials. Within a two block radius of the subject parcel there are multiple flocks of ducks, geese, and goats as well as at least twenty (20) horses, six (6) cows, two (2) llamas, and at least three (3) roosts of chickens. The proposed development site is completely surrounded by an existing well established neighborhood with a definite rural character. Reclassification will create an incompatible island of high density in an area topographically and jurisdictionally isolated to such a degree that transportation and other infrastructure improvements will never be feasible. U120 is the overriding policy in this case. It clearly defines the critical criteria that zoning changes to increase density must meet in order to be approved. No other policy may be applied that would violate this regulation. Character exists in every neighborhood, not just the wealthy ones, and by law must be protected. Page 9 Lines 15 through 20 The applicant insists that the Hearing Examiner failed to consider the sufficiently broad definition of "neighborhood", saying that only the immediately adjacent properties were considered. This is not true. No developments between 156'" Ave. S.E. and the Issaquah City Limits have been developed at density higher than R-4, which is within the range of densities defined as Urban. See Exhibit #31 in Record. Page 9 Lines 21 through 24 The applicant asserts that the adjacent properties have not been developed at higher densities due to lack of services, but our neighbors, the majority of the owners of the land adjacent to these parcels, have disputed this assertion, and this disputation is in the record. The Kezeles, the Milbraths and the Hagermans have never been, are not now, and never will intend to develop at densities greater than R-4. Further, the development pattern of the wider surrounding neighborhood indicates a well defined scale of not greater than R-4 development that has been in place since the early 1960s. See Exhibit #31 in Record. C.A.R.E. Response: Statement of Appeal Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications· L01P0016 and L01TY401 Page 10 Lines 1 through 4 The Hearing Examiner's Conclusion accounts for several facts not acknowledged by the Statement of Appeal. The text of the pertinent conclusion follows: "Reclassification of the Highlands Estates property is distinguished from this application by the facts of that case, particularly its location adjacent to the development of 4,500 square of lots in the City of Renton, the interconnection and overlapping of the road improvements necessary to the development of Maplewood and Highland Estates, and the greater separation of Highlands Estates from fully developed properties on larger lots. Further, contrary to the applicant's statement, the Hearing Examiner did not find that a site could not be rezoned "if an adjacent site was undeveloped or underdeveloped" but that in this case the site would be completely and without exception surrounded by parcels zoned at lower density. Page 10 Lines 8 through 11 This argument is irrelevant. The requirement is simply that urban services must be available. There is no legislative requirement or 'extra credit' for proposed provision of redundant capacity of any urban service. Page 10 Lines 17 through 23 In every Code and Policy citation presented by DDES staff and the applicant, a range of density has been indicated as allowable. 2000 King County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates this area as "Urban Residential, 4-12 dwellings per acre". R-4 is within this allowable range. "U-114 King County shall seek to achieve through future planning efforts over the next twenty years, an average zoning density of at least seven to eight homes per acre in the Urban Growth Area through a mix of densities and housing types. A lower density zone may be used to recognize existing subdivisions with little or no opportunity for infill or redevelopment." To achieve an average density within the Urban Zone, county wide, of seven to eight houses per acre, there must be areas with density lower than that average. Where circumstances in a specific area such as ours make higher density inappropriate, this provision for the allowance of lower density makes it not only possible, but necessary to allow that lower density to be maintained. "U-118 King County should apply minimum density requirements to all urban residential zones of four or more homes per acre, except under limited circumstances ... " The R-4 alternative Plat proposal meets the minimum density requirement. The Hearing Examiner is quite correct in his conclusion that the applicant has failed to prove changed circumstances on any point. This Council must uphold the recommendations of the Hearing Examiner and deny the application for Zone Reclassification. Page 11 Lines 1 through 8 The proposed reclassification is barely w_ithin the very high end limit of that compatible with the Renton Comprehensive Plan. Renton anticipates a maximum density of R-8. However, City of Renton has significantly different definitions of "dwellings per acre." Renton has a net area dwellings per acre.system, as contrasts with King County's gross area dwellings per acre. In King County, if a 10 acre parcel is zoned R-4, has a 2 acre wetland and the plat will require 2 acres of roads -40 units can be allowed. Under Renton standards, sensitive areas and roads are removed from the equation first and only 30 units could be allowed on that same 'parcel. Thus, R-6 under King County is not directly comparable to R-6 under Renton. In addition, the City of Renton has no minimum density requirement. In the Comprehensive Plans of both King County and of the City of Renton, there is a defined range of densities designated as Urban. Where circumstances in a specific area such as ours make higher density inappropriate, this provision for the allowance of lower density makes it not only possible, but necessary to allow that lower density to be maintained. C.A.R.E. Response: Statement of Appeal Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications· L01P0016 and L01TY401 Renton is not planning to increase the zoning density of this area. Notice of a proposed annexation between the · subject parcels and the City Limits of Renton and east of Maplewood Estates. has recently been issued. The proposed annexation will maintain zoning directly comparable to the R-4 designation presently in force. This shows Renton's intent for the long term development of this area. See Exhibit #34 in Record. Page 11 Lines 9 through 20 The Statement of Appeal offers only conjecture as to the efficacy of potential improvements to traffic flow. Further, there reference to the need for this new connection to improve neighborhood circulation "due to growth in other parts of the area" is in error. All recent development in the area has been to the west. No traffic from the new development flows to the east anywhere near the proposed S.E. 1361 " corridor. According to the Traffic Analysis submitted for the Evendell applications, the vast majority of all traffic expected to utilize the opened S.E. 136th will be from the Evendell plat itself and will travel eastbound on that route. The requirement of sewer has been in place for all developments inside the Urban Growth Boundary since the 2000 Comprehensive Plan Update. Special dispensation is not required in response to the proposal to build the lift station. Such construction is a basic requirement for development of any parcel inside the Urban Growth Boundary. Page 11 Line 23 through Page 12 Line 7 In every Code and Policy citation presented by DOES staff and the applicant. a range of density has been indicated as allowable. 2000 King County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates this area as "Urban Residential, 4-12 dwellings per acre·. R-4 is within this allowable range. "U-114 King County shall seek to achieve through future planning efforts over the next twenty years, an average zoning density of at least seven to eight homes per acre in the Urban Growth Area through a mix of densities and housing types. A lower density zone may be used to recognize existing subdivisions with little or no opportunity for infill or redevelopment." To achieve an average density within the Urban Zone, county wide, of seven to eight houses per acre, there must be areas with density lower than that average. Where circumstances in a specific area such as ours make higher density inappropriate, this provision for the allowance of lower density makes it not only possible, but necessary to allow that lower density to be maintained. ·u-118 King County should apply minimum density requirements to all urban residential zones of four or more tiomes per acre, except under limited circumstances ... • The R-4 alternative Plat proposal meets the minimum density requirement. Application of any single County Policy to its maximum limit must not violate any other Policy. U-114 must not be applied in such as way as would violate U-120. Page 12 Lines 9 through 13 The applicant has failed to demonstrate the pi:oposed reclassification meets the requirements of the cited Comprehensive Plan Policies. This Council must uphold the recommendations of the Hearing Examiner and deny the application for Zone Reclassification. Page 13 Lines 23 through Page 12 Line 6 The Statement of Appeal offers only conjecture as to the efficacy of potential improvements to traffic flow. Further, their reference to the need for this new connection to improve neighborhood circu·lation "due to growth in other parts of the area" is in error. All recent development in the area which is now contributing traffic to the local system has been to the west, inside the Renton City Limits. No traffic from the new development flows to the east anywhere near the proposed S.E. 1361 " corridor. According to the Traffic Analysis submitted for the Evendell applications, the vast majority of all traffic expected to utilize the opened S.E. 136th will be from the Evendell plat itself and will travel eastbound on that route. In fact, the opening of S.E. 136th onto 156th Ave S.E. will exacerbate existing traffic problems on that arterial. A better option for road improvement would be the addition of a traffic light and turn lanes at 160th Ave. S.E and S.E. 128th C.A.R.E. Response: Statement of Appeal Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat _Permit Applications -L01P0016 and L01TY401 Ave. 128th is a four lane arterial as opposed to 156th which is a two lane arterial, a designated Life Line Route and the only North/South access for the entire plateau. Page 13 Lines 3 through 11 The assertion that construction of the sewer lift station "will result in greater compliance with the Comprehensive Plan" . is erroneous. The requirement of sewer has been in place for all developments inside the Urban Growth Boundary · since the 2000 Comprehensive Plan Update. Special dispensation is not required in response to the proposal to build the lift station. Such construction is a basic requirement for development of any parcel inside the Urban Growth Boundary. As we have previously testified, see Exhibits #39 and 55 in the Record, on site sewer lift/pump stations are not the only alternative to bring sewer infrastructure to this area. City of Renton Long Range Waste Water Management Plan · I East Cedar River Basin Sewer Collection Report states that Option A (gravity lift station at the Elliot Bridge) is the best option for the following reasons: • Least requirement for force main pipe of all options considered o Lowest cost of all options considered -for both construction and maintenance • Better performance than pump lift station systems o More reliable.than pump lift station systems -less chance of environmental damage due to failure If our community must bear an unequal burden in the name of the public interest that would be served by the provision of sewer infrastructure, we are entitled to a system that does not subject us to the potential consequences of ari inferior infrastructure. Page 13 Lines 12 through 14 There is no shortage of housing or of housing capacity. The Buildable Lands Evaluation Report 2002 has indicated no such shortage now or in the foreseeable future. On page 183 of the Buildable Lands Report, the Residential Capacity Analysis for the South County urban unincorporated area, in which the proposed Evendell site is located, states: "The South County Urban Unincorporated Area has a total residential capacity of 17,283 units. Its remaining target to 2012 is 4,935 households. This amounts to a surplus capacity of 12,384 units greater than its target. It has achieved 53% of its target in the first eight years of the twenty year planning period." On page 9 the following summary conclusions are reported for the entire County: • King County has well over the capacity needed to accommodate the growth that is expected to occur by 2012. o Sufficient capacity exists to accommodate further growth beyond the 2012 planning horizon .. • All the sub-areas of King County show adequate capacity for the target period through 2012, an_d beyond. The data clearly shows that we have much more than sufficient capacity in this area, and in all of King County, to meet all mandated targets -without a single. zone reclassification anywhere in the County or at any time within the planning period. Further, the data shows that:growth in our sub-area has already significantly exceeded planned rates. The infrastructure improvements that are also mandated to meet such growth have, unfortunately, not kept pace. Concurrency policy demands that new growth must only be allowed as infrastructure is constructed to accommodate it. Changes to increase the zoned density will be directly in violation of concurrency policies, and place an unfair burden on the citizens of the South County unincorporated area. C.A.R.E. Response: Statement of Appeal Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications -L01P0016 and L01TY401 Conclusions Lack of transportation capacity is the top Issue in our community, yet we have no reason to anticipate any Improvements. The entire area from the City Limits of Renton to the City Limits of Issaquah; from May Valley to the Cedar River Valley have been out of compliance with King County Concurrency standards since spring 2002. The current Concurrency Status Map shows no improvement, even with the introduction of averaging factors to prevent a single critical link from driving a zone out of compliance. The current Capital Improvements Plan holds no improvements for our area. The KC Comprehensive Plan: Community Action Strategies -Subarea Priority Ranking places East Renton behind North Highline, West Hill, North Soos Creek and Juanita/Kingsgate for both Urban Retrofit and New Capacity Improvements. See Exhibits #22, 29, 30 and 41 in Record. The unique geographic, geological and jurisdictional isolation of this area precipitates a situation in which transportation capacity improvements will never be possible to bring our area back into compliance with concurrency standards. The eastern projection of the Urban Growth Boundary that surrounds the area of unincorporated King County from the City Limits of Renton to approximately Lake Kathleen is isolated by topography and jurisdictional boundaries that prevent logical connection and improvements to the local street network. 1561h Ave SE is the only North/South connection serving this entire plateau. There is no alternative route available to provide additional access or capacity due to the extreme changes in elevation and the limits imposed by local geology. The lack of formal interlocal agreements between King County and the City of Renton leaves our community caught between opposing finger-pointers. The Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council, through multiple correspondences with both jurisdictions, has been assured by each that the other is responsible to provide transportation capacity. Any changes to the zoning in this area to allow increased density now will result in isolated islands of high density that will remain incongruous with the character and scale of this community indefinitely. The current lack of transportation capacity already precludes the issuance of transportation concurrency certificates for proposed development, and since no improvements can. be made, no new certificates will be issued even under the present zoning of R-4. In fact, the transportation concurrency certificates already issued in anticipation of approval of zone reclassifications have contributed significantly to the current state of transportation concurrency compliance failure. Issuance of such certificates has actually closed the opportunity to all applications for development in our area regardless of either current or proposed zoning. See Exhibits #29 and 31 in Record. Piecemeal zoning, such as requested in the Evendell application, requires that decisions be made for which careful and coordinated consideration by the King County Council and staff is not possible to the detriment of existing neighborhoods and communities. Zoning and Land Uses issues can not be successfully addressed one at a time. These issues can not be isolated from each other or from other areas. The County Council has wisely made provision for this fact. Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Plans are re-evaluated on a regular four year schedule, with changes currently under review for any needed revision. Any such revisions will be adopted during the current review and update cycle by December 2004. If circumstances had changed sufficiently to require zoning changes, the City of Renton or King County itself would now be proposing revision of these regulations. There are no proposals to modify the zoning of this area under the current Comprehensive Plan review and update cycle. The King County Buildable Lands Evaluation Report 2002 clearly shows that we have much more than sufficient capacity in the South County .U11lncorporated Area to meet all mandated targets, and that growth already achieved has significantly exceeded planned rates. Not only is there sufficient capacity to meet the requirement of the 4,935 households remaining in the 2012 target, but additional surplus capacity of 12,384 units exits. Unfortunately, the infrastructure improvements that are also mandated to meet .such growth have not kept pace. Concurrency policy demands that new growth must only be allowed as infrastructure is constructed to accommodate it. Changes to increase the zoned density will be directly in violation of concurrency policies, and place an unfair burden on the citizens of the South County unincorporated area. Sufficient capacity exists today without a single zone reclassification anywhere in the County or at any time within the planning period. The applicant has stated the need for Zone Reclassification to make sewer and road improvements financially feasible. There is no requirement under King County Code or the Comprehensive Plan requiring King County to give special dispensation to any developer to allow them to be able to afford to do business. If a project is not financially feasible as presented, it is not our obligation as neighbors, or King County's as a jurisdiction, to bear the burden, or to create unequal and preferential circumstances to promote individual private businesses. C.A.R.E. Response: Statement of Appeal Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications· L01P0016 and L01TY401 Al the Public Hearing the qualifications and years of experience detailed by ODES staff, !he applicant, and !he various experts were impressive. Likewise, !he years of experience represented by !he members of our community are overwhelmingly impressive. More than sixty neighbors, with residencies ranging from one year to over sixty years, attended the Public Hearing on this matter. We represent over 80 households, and our expertise with the physical systems of !his area has already been proven valid. The original Drainage Plan submitted by the applicant was accepted by ODES staff as adequate, until !he issues with which we are all familiar were brought to staff attention and · subsequently verified by !he applicant's own downstream analysis. As a direct result, additional drainage mitigations have been incorporated into !he DOES staff recommendations as well as those of !he Hearing Examiner. We represent literally hundreds of years of expertise in the characteristics of our community -drainage, development history and potential, schools capactties, transportation· everything Iha! affects us as citizens. residents, commuters, parents and property owners. We are the Public, and our interest is in protecting !he character of our neighborhood from being violated and irreparably damaged by irresponsible development. • · The applicant has failed to demonstrate changed conditions or circumstances sufficient to meet the criteria of KCC 20.24.190. • This parcel is not affected differently than any other parcel in the vicinity by the applicable development requirements or circumstances as specified in KCC 20.24.190. • The alternate Plat Proposal for development at the current zoning designation of R-4 meets all applicable criteria set forth In Comprehensive Plan policies, particularly U118 through U123. • The proposed Zone Reclassification is NOT in the public interest as has been voluminously testified by substantial numbers of area citizens and since such reclassification would directly violate U120. For these reasons, we vigorously support the Recommendations of !he Hearing Examiner and respectfully urge denial of the application for Zone Reclassification for the proposed Evendell development. Shirley Day 14412-167'h. Place SE Renton, WA 98059 ( 425) 255-7005 May 19, 2003 Clerk of the Council Room WI025 King Country Courthouse 516-3'd. Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Evendell File No's LOITY401 & LOIP0016 -,-. ~-,_-·; I am writing to protest the appeal of the Evendell rezone from R-4 to R-6. As a resident of the above address for 32 years, I am aware that growth is inevitable. However, what has happened in our area, is growth with no consideration to the existing area or the traffic congestion. Much of King County has already been annexed into the City of Renton. To build homes on all remaining land, not compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhood should not be permitted. Homes are being built all around us in wetland area. Water retention ponds are on almost every block. I believe this is a health and safety hazard. My block has had homes and garages flooded since they cleared the area for homes North of I 44•h. The water retention pond has overflowed in years of heavy rains. I find it hard to believe that there are adequate provisions for drainage and our problems will not mcrease. In the last two years, the worst part of my commute into Seattle has been from my house to the bottom of the hill at Sunset. There are no plans for improving the roads to accommodate all the homes currently being built, let alone all those being plarmed. I hope you will consider the potential problems that increased density will have on our area. There should be no reason that the developer can not build using the alternate R4 plan. Thank you. Sincerely ~~ Shirlene Day ~ ,,., ----.---- . __ , May 20, 2003 King County Council c/o Clerk of the Council King County Courthouse 516-3"' Avenue Seattle, WA 981 04 Re: Evendell Rezone Proposal Dear Council Members: . ,: ) ,v -. I write this letter with the hope that you will exercise the same level of reason in your review of the proposed Evendell re-zoning as Hearing Examiner Pro Tern James O'Conner did when he denied the application for zone re-classification. I have lived at 13012 ISs'h Ave. SE for five years, and I have lived in the East Renton/Issaquah area all my life. When we bought our home, my wife and I did so primarily because of the neighborhood. Given the rural flavor of the area, with homes generally on Y. to I acre lots, livestock ranging from cows to geese to llamas, and modest traffic that has allowed us to walk with the kids and the dog at all hours without concern for safety, this has proven to be an ideal place to raise our two small children (ages 5 and 8). Over the past few years, I have witnessed the dramatic escalation of residential development in the general area. I realize that there is a need for housing to accommodate the expanding population, and I understand the theory behind the Growth Management Act, however, I am troubled when the growth is carried out at the expense of the existing homeowners. In the case at hand, it is undeniable that the proposed 75-home development will have a dramatic and adverse impact on the residents in the surrounding area. Specifically, the character of our neighborhood will be irreversibly altered. No longer will we enjoy the rural quaintness, quiet and safety that I described above. Instead, we will be subjected to dramatic increases in traffic, elimination of trees, vegetation and wildlife (not to mention the associated drainage and environmental issues). The days of walking the kids and the dog without concern for traffic will be over, and we will be deathly afraid any time the children are anywhere close to the street without supervision. Unfortunately, development of the site is inevitable. But can't the interests of all the parties (developers, residents, prospective homeowners) be balanced? The construction of 45 homes (apparently permissible under the current zoning) rather than 75 houses would achieve such a balance. I simply ask that you be reasonable in your analysis of this re-zoning. The current residents of the neighborhood are legitimate stakeholders and their interests must be considered. The proposed re-zone does not consider those interests. The 45 home development, while not something I would endorse, seems a reasonable balance. NC&HJ Mark Costello 13012 1581h Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 Noris, Anne From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: fredjaques@attbi.com Tuesday, May 20, 2003 3:12 AM Anne.Noris@METROKC.GOV; kolouskova@jmmlaw.com ghigh@hotmail.com -1n~e--~(L01P0016&L01TY401). After reading the subject Statement of Appeal, I don't find anything new that was not said at the previous Re-zone meeting. Please read the minutes for my position on the matter. KC law says that a re-zone application should only be allowed if it fits the character and type of the "neighborhood". The definition of the "neighborhood" is simple: it is composed of the houses and the people who were present at the Re-zone hearing. By this definition, it is strictly a rural area. Therefore the Evendell development does not fit the character of the neighborhood and the Re-zone appllication should be rejected. It violates King County law. Respectfully Fred and Helga Jaques 13114, 158 th, Avenue SE Renton , Wa 98059 1 TO: Clerk of the Council Room W1025, King County Courthouse 516 Jrd Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: DDES File Nos. L01P0016 & L01TY401 EVENDELL We wish to reiterate the concerns which we presented to the King County Hearing Examiner on March 6 and March 10,200). At that time we objected to the redesignation of the proper- ties in question from R-4 to R-6 because R-6 does not fit the well-established character of the neighborhood, A second major concern is the impact that additional traffic will have on 156th Ave, SE, This is the only No.-So, con- nector for several miles, and it 0 s a vital lifeline for much of the north side of Maple Valley, An East-West connector accessing a mid-point of 156 Ave. SE (SE 136 st.) does not appreciably improve traffic flow through the neighborhood, but it will definitely slow the heavy volume of traffic on 156 Ave, SE, Finally, we strongly urge the council to allow oral arguments during this appeals process. The people who have made their homes in this area should be heard, We who have lived here for 2, 10, JO, even 60 years have the best insight on the im- pacts (and mitigation of impacts) that new development will have, We are, and should be recognized as, experts on .the problems and special needs this area presents, and which must be taken into account, R~\?.~ 4~0tr'h/ Mr, & rors.~d~;;;{ J. Hill RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2003 KING COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER Clerk of the Council Room Ww25 King County Courthouse 516-J'd A venue Seattle, WA 98w4 £bwarb attb Natte\i Hilt~ 13414 158th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 King County Council Members: RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2003 KING COUNlY HEARING EXAMINER May 21, 2003 We are writing in response to the appeal filed on behalf of the developers of Evendell parcel. We in the neighborhood are very concerned about the re-zoning proposal. My husband and I moved into this neighborhood because of its present character- single family homes on large parcels, with a rural feel-chickens, geese, llamas, horses all around us. The proposed re-zone would result in over 400 daily trips in and out of the neighborhood, making it less safe for the numbers of elderly daily walkers which have chosen our street for their exercising. The present quiet, safe character is what we are trying to preserve, and we are counting on you to fulfill your lawful duty to protect it by denying the rezone. We are concerned about water problems, as water runoff problems already exist-on our property alone we have had to put in curtain drains to keep the ground from becoming soggy. The drainage which is working now will no longer be available, and the mitigation measures I have seen along 128'h (which are also proposed in this developer's plans) are not adequate -and an eyesore in addition. The lower the number of houses put in, the greater the amount of land available to cope with the run-off. We also respectfully request that oral arguments be allowed at this hearing so that the community voice may be heard. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter, which is so much of concern to us. Sincerely, ' 'l!Y)r-. <>1.. rY/rs. FJMJQAJ w, ~h..._ Mr and Mrs. Edward W. Hilton ---MAY 201> 2003 ATTN:'KING.COUNTY.COUNCIL RECEIVED RE: 'REZONE & PROPOSED PLAT OF EVENDELL FILE: ·. MAY 2 3 2003 · LOlTY401&LOlP0016. KING COUNlY HEARING EXAMINER l wotildlike to express my appr~hension and oppositionto tl:tis action:. AsJ · · expressed the problems that would definitely arise in a previomdetter :to the ·. Hearing Examiner, l would like to reiterate on that letter. Asl stated in .. tliis · letter two of the most definite problems are traffic and drainage. ·: ,, DRAINAGE The drainage in thi~ area during years of heavy rains and snowy conditions ... have caused real problems. . ~r only help were the trees and undeveloped landthat handled some ofthe bad storm drainage. With .the cutting of all · · . these trees and all the development going in we could· have a real disaster . . . "" --• .. . . . . :,, . c:) with s.onie ofthe houses sitting on the high;cliffs ending up at the bottom:.::: .... ··~ _ The storm ponds being put in are ajokeand.willonlyadd to theprobletn in'.· · ''~ ~::' bad stormy years; I have lived here all my life andlhave seen what can · 0 ;.:~ ~·· ·. · · happen. · · · -· '"' fT; . <:_~ ~· -· :.i--: 'I'RAFFI C · . 'i: ·-· Trafficjn.iliis ar~heigh&rh~'rf if~ itot'ifrri. fs6~'Ave SE is a mess{ ~::; . tigbtijc,w 1111d ifis jus~ starti11gt9,;ge(sorne' ofthetra1µc. frorr(the. begihni11g,: ' ... ·· ·· of the 4evelopments; l)unng J:raffii;~hours· I hl!ve ~h i11;.bumperto bumper . · traffic,forquite ·awhite-beforefinallygettingto my·h?use:.···TheriI can.not get .. · . into:6y.driveway'or outofit; Attd,.allbfiliidevelopnienthasjtiststaq~; .• The·roa4sir1:-this·11teaarenot•111;ifficieijt·tohapdle·tb.eirafficit•hasnow an~• witlt ,~!;~~ 11e\V"'~~y~lopment going·init'Yil\,beimP,R~sj~l~;':;)Yhy·.~~c~e · • · ,. ·, :s puftihgtlie'carf6efore· tlfo horse. We. . are overdeveloping'.tfiis:area arid 'are going to. have sorrie real problems because deyeloprrient was riot done in a wise manner. This state has developed·too'mst and we have terrible traffic · problems. This has always been the most beautiful state and people.who came here always remarked oil this. Please use some good judgment and . develop a little slower with needed improvements like roads, etc. while doing so. This part of the County is R4, fo11r houses to an acre. This was ·· . . stipposed to have been d'one {vfrh g6<xl'piari11ing:''Cfi:tngiiigthi~to R6, six·, houses to an acre at this tiirte is ridi~lous, ',: ' May 19, 2003 Clerk of the Council RoomWI025 King County Courthouse 516 3•• Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Council Member: I am submitting this letter In reference to: .RECEIVED I\ECl:!\1 E.:U MAY 2 3 Z003 20031FY 22 AM 11: IS KING COUN1Y .. , , , . HEARING EXAMINER ~ , ' ., ~-. ,. '\ Rezone from R4 to R6 or greater for Proposed Plat ofEvendell File No's: LOIP0016 and LOITY401. (plan I for 11 and Y, acres and plan 2 for 15 acres) This rezone has been denied by Mr. James O'Conner, Deputy Hearing Examiner, King County Hearing Examiners Office, 850 Union Bank of California Bldg., 900 4th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98164, and is now being appealed by the developers. I am in full agreement with the denial as presented by Mr. James O'Conner. I have previously submitted letters and comment to King County DDES, Land Services Division (Current Planning Section) and the King County Surface and Water and Land Management (KCSWLM) and testified at the hearing. As a Party of Record I request to be allowed to present oral arguments at this appeal hearing. Unfortunately for current residents it appears we fall out side of any environmental protection on our side of the Urban Growth Boundary, and reside in a "no-mans'' lap.cl with confusion among jurisdictions about who has authority within it. I have grave concerns about the Piggyback ReZone applications being filed should the developers of the Proposed Plat ofEvendell File No's: LOIP0016 and LOITY401 be granted their original or somewhat modified request. The parcel to the east of Evendell, across 1601h Avenue SE. has filed for Zone Reclassification from R-4 to R-6 as well. This is the Liberty Grove Contiguous Plat & Rezone (L03P0005 and L03TY 40 I). Already the Hamilton Place Proposed Plat, File No: L02PO 11, has been granted. This means an increase of approximately 300 homes within one-half mile of my home in an area where the roads, safety evacuation routes, drainage, and wildlife are already strained and will now be severely affected and compromised. Issues I have addressed previously include: a. Density at R-4 and the allowed transfer of Density Credits. It is of grave concern to see that the law setting the zoning at R-4 can be worked around by the transfer of Density Credits, so that in effect an R-4 zoning instead of allowing 4 houses to an acre can be stretched to allow 6 houses to an acre while still maintaining its R-4 zoning rating. That is what is happening with the Hamilton Place Proposed Plat. Frankly, this makes a mockery of saying that it is R-4 zoning. (See page 5, paragraph 3 under "g." of the DOES Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner, March 6, 2003, for the Evendell Proposed Plat.) b. Other adjustments included in the ODES Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner March 6, 2003, for the Evendell Proposed Plat Evendell are. (I) Lot line adjustments to revise the boundary: On pages 5, paragraph 8 and 9 under g of the DOES. (2) Boundary Line Adjustment {BLA): On page 16 at paragraph 4, paragraph 2. (3) Density Transfer and Density Incentive Programs: Page 9 last paragraph at the bottom. c. The law is clear and ls not based on subjective finding. Calculation mistakes and conflicting statements are throughout the Evendell application: Some examples are (I) References in the original application were unclear or incorrect. Some examples. (a) On page I, paragraph two cites a 46 lot plat based on existing R-4 zoning on the east 11.46 acres. However, the description below at "Acreage Rezone/Plat" lists 13 acres with a density of5.6 dwellings per acre with 7.4 dwellings per net acre. Which is it? (b) On attachment 4 page I is shown R-6 zoning and 4-12 units per acre; on attachment 4, page 2, is shown a 12.43 acre site with 6 houses per acre, for 74.58 dwelling units, and residential subdivision and townhouses developed at a density of 8 units or less per acre, number of proposed units 70; on attachment 4, page 3, 48.17 minimum dwelling units are required; on attachment 4, page 4, there is a maximum density of 12.43 acres. Which is it? for this proposal. (c) The original application stated the application was in the Renton School District. It is served by the Issaquah School District. ( d) This is the Four Creeks Unincorporated area, bounded by Briarwood, Coalfield, Lake Kathleen, May Valley, and 160 Ave. SE. It was referred to as Community Plan" Newcastle." (2) Subjective language is used throughout. Examples: (a) page 14, paragraph 3 "ODES and DOT staff do not anticipate ... " (b) page 15, paragraph 3, line 6 "potential deficient condition." (c) page 3, at 15 Plat, paragraph 3. "Minor revisions to the plat which do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the DOES." (3) Throughout the proposal are a lot of"should's", "mosts" and "expectations" in the language. These are not binding, are subjective conclusions of opinion, and carry no formal weight. I request that all calculations he put out in a factual table. I further request that the manual calculation requirements of the King County Surface Water Control Manual of 1998, be shown by a hydrologist or Dow engineer to have been accurately applied by the Evendell developer and the DDES prior to this appeal by the developer being granted. d. SEPA standards must be adhered to by law. The calculations are extremely important because of inaccuracies In the presentation of the developer and DDES testimonies during the Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner, March 6, 2003, on the proposed rezone and proposed plat of Evendell. The cumulative Impact of all the plats being filed in such a sniall area will directly affect existing flooding and surface water management. (I) DOES made a determination of"insignificant environmental impact." In light of the testimony from many current residents as to flooding on their land 1 we believe ODES needs to show in a more concrete manner how they add,essed the SEPA standards. (2) I appeal that the threshold of determination be applied concerning how SEPA Is suppose to work so that the county, the DDES, and the developers have ensured that the best conditions prevail and that mitigations and land density credits will not cause the plat development(s) to fall below the SEPA standards. 2 (3) At page 4, F. Natural Environment we note that water flow is significant when there is a 20 foot drop. In addition: (a) The soil survey reference shown in the application was made 30 years ago. Substantial changes in tree growth, etc. have occurred. It is a known fact that trees absorb many thousands of gallons of water. If these are removed where is the water going to go in an area that already floods. (b) They list 7,000 square feet of wetland. That is a substantial flooding area. (See paragraphs P3, paragraph 3, paragraph 4, 5, and 6. (4) At page 6, Drainage: (a) Until storm pond statistics from the KCSWLM Offices and the Cedar River Basin Steward are obtained for comparison on how well the storm ponds ( detention as they are called in the application) actually function in this area and surrounding areas of like land during the wet season and over time, and are presented for public access, the reports by ODES and the Haozous Engineering, Inc., are subject to subjective misinterpretations and conjecture. (b) We have heard about the sewers but not about the storm drains. On page l 06 at 7.c. there is no approved permanent storm drain outlet# yet on file with DDES and/or the King County Department of Transportation. (c) On Attachment 9, page 2 of 3, at the top "4." "As a result, controlled outflows from the western area will be released FARTHER UPSTREAM IN THE DITCH SYSTEM OF 156 TH A VE. SE." (I) DOES states in the report that these ~ulverts are undersized. (2) I can testify as a resident of 23 years the building on the hill has affected the drainage such that it now drains onto my property to the East from those culverts during heavy storm conditions and floods my flat areas with a minimum of 4 inches of water across the entire surface. I also have flooding under my house for the last 3 years which I have never had in the 20 years prior. (3) When my neighbors and I cannot take showers in the summer months because of low water pressure, how is the fire protectiori at page 8, J.3 going to be maintained? (d) There are three residential ponds within 800 ft ofmy property, and at the base of the hill at Coalfield there is a huge pond the size of a small lake. e. Traffic and personal safety: (I) The City of Renton, who anticipates annexing us is not happy about the single egress shown· in the Evendell Plat and neither are we. How will 70 homeowners get out at the same time firefighters and or rescue crews are trying to get in. (2) In addition, 156"' Ave. SE. is a primary evacuation route, is not geared to handle 300 more residential homes, and at its current capacity the safety of both the current and new residents will be severely compromised by the addition of 300 new homes in such a small area. (2) No provision has been made for sidewalks outside the developments from which DOES states "700 vehicle trips a day will be generated." Not only is this a huge safety issue for all ofus who enjoy evening walks, but for our children crossing to school bus stops. f. Legalities already in place: (!) U-120 states "King County shall not approve proposed zoning changes lo increase density within the urban area unless: A. the development will be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhood." Most of the comparisons used by the developer for the · surrounding neighborhood are OUTSIDE the boundaries they themselves have identified as our neighborhood. (2) Written into the homeowners agreement for the new homeowners signature is the agreement that if you purchase one of these houses, you agree not to fight annexation when it comes to a vote. This is an abridgement of constitutional rights and the guarantee of future freedom of choice. (3) The ODES and.the developer identify the neighborhood themselves as the immediate area bounded by 160th Ave. SE., SE 128th, SE 138th, and 156th Ave. SE., in unincorporated King County. (See page 9.a.b.c.e., and on page 11.) Yet throughout they use Renton City covenants and zonings that do not apply to Unincorporated King County. R-4 in the City of Renton is not the same as R-4 in unincorporated King County. In conclusion: This is a landmark case for this area of King County. I quote page 14, the last paragraph of the original DOES Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner, March 6, 2003, for the Evendell Proposed Plat: "The sewer and road improvements for this rezone/plat are necessary to make this first stage of urban conversion successful, and will provide an infrastructure foundation for the further development of other properties consistent with the R-4 designation." We are not against progress. We know development is coming. But say that progress must be in accordance with the existing SEPA laws, the KCSWCM of 1998, and U-120. As an access professional I know that you have a myriad of sometimes confusing and overlapping regulations to deal with in making your decisions. As the existing community, and in the protection of the new neighbors we have yet to meet, we look to your expertise from different disciplines to provide careful analysis and consideration as you make your officiai determinations on the appeal filed by the developer(s). Thank you for your time. Sincerely, -~7 M .. //{~&. <2._t,<{f}(:';:t~ Michael Rae Cooke Program Analyst and FOIA Officer by profession 13125 158th Ave. SE. Renton, Washington Message phone (425) 413 8623 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER March 6, 2003-PUBLIC HEARING AT 9:30 AM Hearing Room at DDES 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Phone: (206) 296-6600 REZONE & PROPOSED PLAT OF EVENDELL FILE NO's: L01TY401 & L01P0016 PROPOSED REZONE ORDINANCE NO: #2003-0032 PROPOSED PLAT ORDINANCE NO. #2003-0031 A. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION: This is a request for reclassification of 13 acres from R-4 (Residential 4 dwellings per acre) to R-6 (Residential 6 dwellings per acre) and subdivision of approximately 12 acres of the property into 70 lots mostly ranging from 3,900 square feet to 6,600 square feet. The west 200 feet of the rezone area is not part of the plat, but will be kept as a large 26,000 sq. ft. parcel with the existing single family house, garage and pool to remain. As part of the plat, two recreation areas and two drainage detention areas are proposed. A second residence inside the plat will also be retained. Access to the lots is proposed via SE 136'h Street. See Attachment 1 -the rezone area and Attachment 2 -the proposed plat map. A 46 lot plat based on the existing R-4 zoning on the east 11.46 acres was also submitted as an alternative plan should the rezone not be approved. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner: Representative: U.S. Land Development Association P.O. Box 22200 Seattle, WA 98122 Michael Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 81h Dr. SE, Bothell, WA 98021 Phone: 425-486-2563 Facsimile: (425) 486-3273 e-mail: michael.j.romano@gte.net 7/ C. LOITY401 and L01POOl6 EvendelJ Location: Lying south of SE I 36'h St. between 156'h Ave. SE and 1601h Ave. SE. Acreage Rezone/Plat: 13 acres Zoning: Existing R-4 to Proposed R-6 Number of Lots: 70 Density: 5.6 dwellings per acre with 7.4 dwellings per net acre Lot Size: 3,900 to 6,600 square feet Proposed Use: single family Sewage Disposal: City of Renton Water Supply: Water District #90 Fire District: King County Fire District# 25 School District: Renton Complete Application Date: September 20, 200 I Threshold Determination: Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) Date of Issuance: December 23, 2002 King County Permits: Rezone & Subdivision Permit Contact: Karen Scharer, Project Manager II, Current Planning Section, LUSD Phone# 296-7114 or e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Community Plan: Newcastle Drainage Subbasin: Lower Cedar River Sectionffownship/Range: SE 14-23-05 Parcels# 142305 9022 & 9009 HISTORY /BACKGROUND: I. The Subdivision Technical Committee (STC) of King County has conducted an on-site examination of the subject property. The STC has discussed the proposed development with the applicant to clarify technical details of the application, and to determine the compatibility of this project with applicable King County plans, codes, and other official documents regulating this development. As a result of discussions, the applicant presented the STC with a conceptual build out plan of the immediate neighborhood (Attachment 2), revised plans for frontage road improvements, submitted a revised traffic study including pipeline development projects. Subsequently, DDES was able to obtain claims submitted to King County for drainage problems, which were then reviewed by the applicant, and an updated Level 3 drainage report was submitted December 9, 2002. In mid December 2002, the STC determined that there was sufficient information presented to proceed with issuance of a SEPA TD and scheduling of a public hearing on the requests. 2. Under KCC 20.20.070, lhe request for rezone (Type 4 permit) is not vested under regulations in effect at the time of complete rezone application. Vesting to zoning can only occur once the zone becomes effective. The plat applicalion (Type 3 permit) is based on lhe rezone to R-6; therefore the plat can not be vested to zoning. If the rezone were denied, the applicant's 2 LOITY401 and LOIPOOl6 Evcndell alternative plat layout under the existing R-4 zone is vested and could move forward through the hearing process. D. THRESHOLD DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE: Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.2IC, the responsible official of the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) issued a threshold detennination -mitigated determination of non-significance (MONS) for the proposed development on December 23, 2002. This determination was based on the review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent documents, resulting in the conclusion that the proposal would not cause probable significant adverse impacts on the environment with implementation of mitigation for the proposal. Therefore, an environmental impact statement (EIS) was not required prior to proceeding with the review process. Agencies, affected Native American tribes and the public were offered the opportunity to comment on or appeal the determination for 21 days. The MONS was not appealed by any party, including the applicant, and it has been incorporated as part of the applicant's proposal. The MONS states: The following mitigation measures shall be attached as conditions of permit issuance. These mitigation measures are consistent with policies, plans, rules, or regulations designated by KCC 20.44.080 as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority and in effect when this threshold determination is issued. Key sources of substantive authority for each mitigation measure are in parentheses; however, other sources of substantive authority may exist but are not expressly listed. A. East Drainage Basin: The 160th Ave SE downstream conveyance system shall be upgraded to provide for the JOO-year storm capacity. Downstream driveway culverts/ditches and a cross-culvert under J6dh Ave. SE shall be improved as follows: Culverts P-117 and P-116 on the west side of J6dh Ave. SE, cross-culvert P-115, and culverts P-114 and P-113 on the east side of J 6dh Ave. SE shall be improved as needed. The culvert designations are according to the Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis by Haozous Engineering dated August 26, 2002. To address a related localized flooding condition, bank and channel stabilization are also required in the unopened right-of-way for 162"d Ave. SE, in the vicinity of the easterly line of Lot 12, Rich Lea Crest (address 16046 SE 142"d Street). It is estimated that stabilizing and re-grading approximately 50 to JOO feet of channel, east of 16046 SE J 42"d Street, will be adequate to resolve flooding that has occurred in the past location. The culverts and channel described are located from the south site boundary to a distance of approximately 1,700 feet downstream. 3 73 E. F. LOITY401 and LOIPOOl6 Evendell Level 2 Flow Control design is required for the proposed stormwater detention facility. A factor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. 8. West Drainage Basin: The stormwater detention facilities shall be designed to the Level 3 Flow Control Standard as described in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). As an option, Level 2 Flow Control with downstream improvements can be proposed according to Core Requirement 2 of the KCSWDM. The minimum Flow Control Standard shall be Level 2. A factor of safety of 5 to .15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. [Comprehensive Plan Policies U-109, E-126, F-254 & F-255; RCW 58.17.110] AGENCIES CONT ACTED: I. King County Natural Resources & Parks Division: No response. 2. King County Fire Protection Engineer: Fire protection engineering preliminary approval has been granted as requested. 3. Seattle-King County Health Department: No response. 4. Renton School District: See Attachment 8 and comments contained in report. 5. Water District# 90: See Attachment 7. 6. City of Renton/ Sewer: See Attachments 5 & 6. 7. Washington State Department of Ecology: No response. 8. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife: No response. 9. Washington State Department of Natural Resources: No response. IO. Washington State Department of Transportation: No response. 11. METRO: No response. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT: I. Topography: The site is relatively level with a 20-foot difference in elevation from the north central area to the southwest and to the southeast corners of the site. 4 LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evcndell 2. Soils: Surface soils are found on this site per King County Soil Survey, 1973 include: AgC -Alderwood gravely, sandy loam; 6-15 % slopes. Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil type has a moderate limitation for low building foundations due to a seasonally high water table, and severe limitations for septic tank filter fields due to very slow permeability in the substratum. 3. Sensitive Areas: The site has been field checked. There is a Class II Wetland located on the northeast portion of the site according to the LUSD wetland ecologist assigned to review this project. The 17, 162-sq. ft. wetland is classified as a palustrine, forested, seasonally flooded/saturated & palustrine, emergent, seasonally flooded. The Addendum to the Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report dated 10/28/02 clarified that the proposal was revised so that buffer averaging is no longer part of the proposal. Road improvements will cause filling of 200-sq. ft. wetland, with 400-sq. ft. of mitigation proposed. Road improvements will impact 6,989-sq. ft. of wetland buffer. An additional 15,495-sq. ft. of buffer is proposed in the NE comer of site to provide mitigation at a ratio greater than 2 to I. Improvements to the downstream drainage system through up sizing culverts will have to be reviewed to ensure that no wetlands are being drained or flooded as a result, no streams placed in pipes, or no streams damaged by increased flows downstream from replaced culverts. Up sizing culverts in a sensitive area requires a clearing and grading permit. 4. Hydrography: A preliminary June 15, 2001, technical information report was prepared by Haozous Engineering, P.S. on June 15, 200 I. Subsequently a Level 3 Downstream Analysis was submitted August 26, 2002 and a Level Three Addendum was submitted December 5, 2002. The site is within the Orting Hills subbasin of the Cedar River watershed. Flooding has occurred in the past along downstream conveyance structures from the site on 1601 h Ave. SE, 1561 h Ave. SE, and on nearby properties. These drainage issues are documented in the Level Three Downstream Analyses and Addendum. 5. Vegetation: The westerly 2.5 acres is mostly covered by pasture with some trees central and on the east edge. More than half of the east 11 acre area is wooded with a conifer upland forest and primarily Douglas fir. The far south of the parcel is developed with pasture and the north central area has partially been cleared as yard area associated with the home and south central includes deciduous trees and native shrubs. 6. Wildlife: A wildlife study in conjunction with the Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation, and Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Plan was prepared for this site and dated May 15, 2001. A large variety of small birds and animals were observed on site. Black tail deer and ruffed grouse both "Priority Species" of Washington State were observed. A single "State Candidate" species -the pileated woodpecker -was observed to utilize 5 \"II G. LOITY401 and LOJP0016 EvendcH the forested wetland area along with adjacent upland forested area onsite per page 12 of the report. According to DOES staff Senior Ecologist, none of the species identified in the applicant's report are required to be protected in the urban designated part of the County where this project lies. And, there was no specific information provided in the citizens' documentation to indicate the presence of nesting sites on the proposal property for any protected species. However with preservation of the wetland and a 50-foot buffer, habitat will indeed be protected. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The site is located in the Renton Highlands area. Properties located nearby vary in size from large 5-acre parcels to small urban lots. The neighborhood is rapidly changing from a rural-suburban character to an urbanized area with mostly single family homes and some related services such as schools, a fire station, churches and parks. Developed lots immediately nearby are on septic systems. These lots are approximately 9,000 square feet to 30,000 square feet in size. However, directly north and south of the eastern portion of the site is a 5 and 4 acre tract respectively, each developed with a single-family house. Many of the parcels are currently considered as under utilized for the urban R-4 zone designation. Zoning surrounding of Evendell is mostly R-4. R-8 zoning is designated on the 60 lot plat of Highland Estates located west of I 56'h Ave. SE and south of SE 1361h St. (Files LOOTY 402 & LOOP0009). Sewer service will be provided to this development. The proposed plat of Hamilton Place (L02POOI I) is located on property700 feet north of the site between 1561h Ave. SE & 1601h Ave. SE. Lots proposed would average approximately 5,000-sq. ft. each. Transfer of 6 density credits to this plat is proposed. The recently platted parcel of "5 Lot Subdivision", LOOP0023 is located southeast off 162"d Ave. SE and contains 5 lots averaging .9 d.u.'s per acre. ODES has also held pre-application meetings for three other plats in the immediate area, including the property directly north of the east portion of Evendell and property east of 1601h Ave. SE. Timing for submittal of these applications is currently unknown. The City of Renton city limits are approximately 1,300 feet to the west of the site at the southeast comer of the plat of Maplewood which is under construction. City of Renton zoning within this plat includes the designations of R-5 and R-8. On-Site: The east 11 acres of the site is currently developed with one single family home, detached garage and out buildings. The house is to remain and will be on Lot #52 of the plat. The remaining accessory buildings will be removed. The most westerly 200 feet on the west 2.5 acres of the rezone is outside of the plat boundary. A house, garage and pool are located in this area. The other buildings: associated shop, carport and 6 LOJTY401 and LOJPOOl6 Evendcll greenhouse are all within the plat boundary and these structures will be removed prior to final plat. A lot line adjustment is to be completed prior to final platting of Evendell to revise the boundary to except out th.e house on the west portion of the property. H. SUBDIVISION DESIGN FEATURES: I. Lot Pattern and Density: The proposed lot and street layout is in conformance with King County Codes (i.e. KCC 21 A and the 1993 King County Road Standards. Density calculations for the plat average 5.6 d.u.' s per acre. The 70 lots ranging from 3,900 square feet to 6,600 square feet. 2. Internal Circulation: Most lots will front onto a public street that provides an internal loop street within the subdivision and exits out to SE 1361h Street. Private access tracts (PAT's) and Joint Use Development Tracts (JUDT's) connect to the public (loop) street will serve a few other lots. The remaining lots on the west side of the plat will front on PA T's & JUDT's off SE 136'h Street. See the proposed plat layout, Attachment 2 to this report. Attachment 3 shows the alternative 46 lot plat design for the east 11 acres should the proposed rezone and 70 lot plat not be approved. 3. Roadway Section: As proposed, SE 1361h Street would be improved with urban improvements along the north & south sides of street frontage between l 56'h Ave. SE and l 58'h Ave. SE, but without sidewalks on the north side. Between 1581h Ave. SE and 1601h Ave. SE, J 36'h St. will be improved with a half street with curb, gutter and sidewalks on the south side. Shoulder improvements with 8-feet wide paving are planned for the right of way on the west side of 1601h Ave. SE that abuts the east boundary of the site. The public loop street serving most lots within the plat will be improved as an urban subaccess street with the access between SE 1361h St. and the loop (1581h Ave. SE) will be improved as an urban subcollector. Sidewalks will be provided on the outside curve of the loop street. The six J.U.D.T. will each serve two lots and the three P.A.T. will each serve more than three lots. 4. Drainage: The plat is required to comply with the 1998 King County Drainage Manual. A SWM Adjustment (File No. L02V0024) was approved for the subdivision allowing .15 acres of the western subbasin to be added into the eastern subbasin & the western subbasin controlled outflow will be released farther upstream in the ditch system of 156'h Ave. SE. Detention for the west portion of the development will be placed on the southwest corner of the plat and detention for the east portion of the site will be located on the south east comer of the site. 7 77 I. LOITY401 and LOIPOOl6 Evendcl1 The applicant has proposed to address the current severe flooding issues along 1601h Ave. SE and neighboring properties by upgrading the conveyance system and eliminating constrictions at critical locations. An onsite Level 3 flow control standard (King County's most restrictive release rate) is proposed for the westerly portion of the site flowing to 1561h Ave. SE rather than upgrading the downstream structures as only a small portion of the plat drail)age flows west. Also see Section D. of this report regarding the SEPA MDNS drainage improvements. TRANSPORTATION PLANS: I. Transportation Plans: The King County Transportation Plan indicates that SE I 36th'h Street is a non-Arterial Road. The King County Nonmotorized Transportation Plan does not designate this roadway for bicycles of equestrian use. The subject subdivision is not in conflict with this plan, nor with the King County Regional Trails Plan or Nonmotorized Plan. 2. Subdivision Access: The subdivision will gain access from SE 1361h Street with most trips via 1561h Ave SE. A south bound left turn lane from 1561h Ave SE will be provided to assure safe access onto SE 136 1h Street. SE 1361h St. between 156 1h Ave. SE and 1581h Ave. SE will be improved to an urban neighborhood collector standard with curb, gutter and sidewalks on the south side; and, curb and gutters on the north side. At 158 1h Ave. SE to 160'h Ave. SE, this street portion will be improved as a neighborhood collector with urban half street improvements. Nine lots could have direct access to SE 1361h Street, instead, streets and access tracts have been sized to provide alternative access to these lots. The remaining 61 lots will front on the internal loop or other private access tracts. 3. Traffic Generation: It is expected that approximately 700 vehicle trips per day will be generated with full development of the proposed subdivision. This calculation includes service vehicles (i.e., mail delivery, garbage pick-up, school bus) which may currently serve this neighborhood, as well as work trips, shopping, etc. 4. Adequacy of Arterial Roads: This proposal has been reviewed under the criteria in King County Code 14.70, Transportation Concurrency Management; 14.80, Intersection Standards; and King County Code 14.75; Mitigation Payment System. a. b. King County Code 14.70 -Transportation Concurrency Management: The Transportation Certificate of Concurrency indicates that transportation improvements or strategies will be in place at the time of development, or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies within six (6) years, according to RCW 36.70A.070(6). King County Code 14.80 -Intersection Standards: The existing arterial system will accommodate the increased traffic volume generated by this proposal. 8 c. King County Code 14.75 -Mitigation Payment System: LOITY401 and LOIPOOl6 Evendell King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), requires the payment of a traffic impact mitigation fee (MPS fee) and an administration fee for each single family residential lot or unit created. MPS fees are determined by the zone in which the site is located. This site is in Zone 452 per the MPS/Quartersection list. MPS fees may be paid at the time of final plat recording, or deferred until building permits are issued. The amount of the fee will be determined by the applicable fee ordinance at the time the fee is collected. J. PUBLIC SERVICES: I. Schools: This proposal has been reviewed under RCW 58.17 .110 and King County Code 21 A.28 (School Adequacy). a. School Facilities: The subject subdivision will be served by the Renton School District (see Attachment 8 for schools serving the site). b. School Capacity: The Renton School Board has not adopted capacity figures which indicate their ability to accommodate additional students. The district therefore anticipates adequate capacity to accommodate the students generated by this proposal. c. School Impact Fees: No ordinance requiring impact fees for this school district has been adopted. d. School Access: The District has indicated that the future students from this subdivision will be bussed from the intersection of SE l 36ht St. and l 60'h Ave. SE. Curb, gutter and sidewalks are proposed on the south side of SE ! 36'h St. to provide a walking surface between 1601h Ave. SE and 156'h Ave. SE. 2. Parks and Recreation Space: The nearest public park is located on the south west corner of 152"d Ave. SE and SE 1361h St. The applicant has proposed on-site recreation including two recreation areas, Tract N on the west end and tracts L & M on the southeast area of the plat. The details of improvements will be designed and submitted for approval prior to final plat. KCC 21A.14 requires subdivisions in the UR and R zone classifications to either provide on-site recreation space or pay a fee to the Parks Division for establishment and maintenance of neighborhood parks. The required recreation area per code equals 27,300 sq. ft. Tract L will contain 15,088 sq. ft. and the remaining 12,212 sq. ft. required will be provided within the two drainage tracts, Tracts M & N. 9 LOITY401 and LOIP0016 EvcndeH Per KCC 2 IA.14.180 E, one tot lot and three additional playground/recreational facilities will be required. The applicant plans to locate one recreation feature on Tract N and other two features designed with the tot lot as part of tracts L and M. The stonn/recreation tracts will be required to comply with standards of KCC 21 A.14.180. Specifically, Tracts Land M will be required to be recorded as one tract per KCC 2 IA.14.180 G. 3. Fire Protection: The Certificate of Water Availability from Water District 90 indicates that water is presently available to the site in sufficient quantity to satisfy King County Fire Flow Standards. Prior to final recording of the plat, the water service facilities must be reviewed and approved per King County Fire Flow Standards. K. UTILITIES: L. I. Sewage Disposal: A Certificate of Sewer Availability, dated May 18, 2001 indicates the city's capability to serve the proposed development (see Attachment 6). A sewage pump station will be constructed on the southeast comer of the plat as the property currently can not be served by gravity flow. By providing a pump station, approximately 37 acres in the immediate area will sewer available. The existing sewer line will be extended east along SE 1361h Street to the subject property to provide connection to Renton's sewer system. 2. · Water Supply: The applicant proposes to serve the subject subdivision with water from Water District 90. A Certificate of Water Availability, dated May 30, 200 I, indicates this district's capability to serve the proposed development (see Attachment 7). COMPREHENSIVE AND COMMUNITY PLAN: I. Comprehensive Plan 2000 Land Use Map: This proposal is governed by the 2000 King County Comprehensive Plan with Land Use Map that designates this area as "Urban Residential, 4-12 dwellings per acre". 2. The following policies and principles of the Comprehensive Plan are relevant to the proposed rezone and subdivision: 10 LOITY401 and LOIPOOl6 Evendcll a. Chapter 2-Urban Land Use, B. Residential Land Use, Section# 2 U-114 King County shall seek to achieve through future planning efforts over the next twenty years, an average zoning density of at least seven to eight homes per acre in the Urban Growth Area through a mix of densities and housing types. A lower density zone may be used to recognize existing subdivisions with little or no opportunity for infill or redevelopment. U-118 King County should apply minimum density requirements to all urban residential zones of four or more homes per acre, except under limited circumstances such as the: a. Presence of significant physical constraints, or b. Implementation of standards applied to a property through a property-specific development.condition, special district overlay, or subarea plan. Comment: The proposal would yield an overall density of 5.6 dwellings per acre. b. Chapter 2-Urban Land Use, B. Residential Land Use, Section# 3.-Increases of Zoning Density: While King County supports higher densities in the urban areas, increased densities that would be incompatible with existing neighborhoods or cause significant impacts on roads, services and the environment are discouraged. The following policies will guide decisions on application of densities and proposed rezones. U-120 King County shall not approve proposed zoning changes to increase density within the Urban Area unless: a. The development will be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhood; Comment: The area is in transition from an under utilized urban area to a neighborhood that is shifting to more of an urban area with a full range of urban services for the residents. There are other similar residential developments in the neighborhood currently under construction or in the planning stages (see Section G of this report). b. Urban public facilities and services are adequate, consistent with adopted levels of service and meet GMA concurrency requirements, including King County transportation concurrency standards; Comment: Urban services are available to the property and concurrency standards are met. c. The proposed density change will not increase unmitigated adverse impacts on environmentally sensitive areas, either on site or in the vicinity of the proposed development; 11 ?I LOITY401 and LOIPOOl6 Evendell Comment: The Class II Wetland on the site will be preserved under the Standards of KCC 21A.24. Drainage will be mitigated through the implementation of the 1998 KC Drainage Manual and through the SEPAMDNS. d. The proposed density increase will be consistent with or contribute to achieving the goals and policies of this Comprehensive Plan, and subarea plan, if applicable; and Comment: The proposed density is within the density range of 4-12 dwellings per acre as designated by the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Also see the Analysis Section of this report. e. The proposal is consistent with the adopted city comprehensive plan for the Potential Annexation Area where the rezone is located if the proposed density exceeds eight dwelling units per acre. If the city is not planning for urban densities and efficient land use patterns consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies, then this paragraph shall not apply. Comment: The proposal is consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan. The density does not exceed eight dwellings per acre. U-121 King County, when evaluating rezone requests for increases in density, shall notify adjacent cities, special purpose districts and local providers of urban utility services and should work with these service providers on issues raised by the proposal. Comment: ODES notified the City of Renton and the city has responded to this request through a series of correspondence (Attachment 5 & 6). Road improvement standards of King County that will be used to build out this plat would seem the only issue of concern raised by the City. U-122 King County supports increases in urban residential density through a rezone or a proposal to increase density through the density transfer or density incentive programs when the proposal will help resolve traffic, sewer, water, parks or open space deficiencies in the immediate neighborhood. Comment: The development will provide extensions of sewer and a pump station with the ability to serve a 37 acre area providing future opportunity for sewer hook-up by other nearby property owners. An east west connection between 1561h Ave. SE and 1601h Ave. SE will be provided serving the neighborhood with an alternative neighborhood access connection. 156th Ave SE will be improved with a southbound left turn lane onto SE 136 1h Street. 12 LOJTY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell Additionally, the following table displays the road improvements which would be provided under the R-6 proposal and R-4 Alternative. SE 136TH ST. SE 136TH ST SE 136TH ST 160TH AVE. SE 160TH A VE. SE New Right-of Way Right-of Way Right-of Way Right-of Way Improvements Improvements 8 Foot Improvements Curb, Gutter, & Curb, &Gutter Shoulder Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalks (north side) Improvement Sidewalks Rezone & Plat l,250 feet 1,250 feet 625 feet 800 feet 0 70 Lots East -59 Lots 625 feet 625 feet 800 feet 0 West -11 Lots 625 feet 625 feet 625 feet 0 0 Alternative R-4 625 feet* 0 0 0 800 feet Plat -44 Lots * The applicant is not proposing dedication of right-of-way under the R-4 Alternative, however DDES would recommend dedication. As shown, more improvements under the rezone w/70 lot plat will be provided than with the alternative R-4 plat proposal. Proportional dedication per lot and proportional improvements to streets abutting calculates as follows: RIGHT-OF-CURB, GUTTER, CURB & GUTTER 8-FOOT WAY SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS SHOULDER DEDICATION IMPROVEMENTS PER LOT IMPROVEMENTS PER LOT PER LOT (North Side of PER LOT street) Rezone & Plat 18 linear feet 18 linear feet 9 linear feet 11 linear feet R-6 w/70 Lot (SE 1361 • St.) Alternative R-4 14 linear feet* 18 linear feet 0 0 46 Lot Plat (160 1 • Ave. SE) • The applicant is not proposing dedication of right-of-way under the R-4 Alternative, however DOES would be recommending dedication for SE 136'' St. between 158'' Ave. SE and 160'• Ave. SE. The above table shows that 4 lineal feet of additional right-of-way per lot would be dedicated and 11 lineal feet of additional shoulder improvements would be built per lot under the rezone w/70 lot plat than the 46 lot plat. 13 M. CRITERIA FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPROVAL: LOITY401 and LOIPOOl6 Evendell • 1. KCC 21A.44.060 Zone reclassification. A zone reclassification shall be granted only if the applicant demonstrates that the proposal complies with the criteria for approval specified in KCC 20.24.180 and 20.24.190 and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and applicable community and functional plans. Comment: See Section Labove for a discussion of applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies and the Analysis Section of this report below. 2. KCC 20.24.180 Examiner findings. When the examiner renders a decision or recommendation, he or she shall make and enter findings of fact and conclusions from the record which support the decision and the findings and conclusions shall set forth and demonstrate the manner in which the decision or recommendation is consistent with, carries out and helps implement applicable state laws and regulations and the regulations, policies, objectives and goals of the comprehensive plan, subarea or community plans, the zoning code, the land segregation code and other official laws, policies and objectives of King County, and that the recommendation or decision will not be unreasonably incompatible with or detrimental to affected properties and the general public. 3. KCC 20.24.190 Additional examiner findings -reclassifications and shoreline redesignations. When the examiner issues a recommendation regarding an application for a reclassification of property or for a shoreline environment redesignation, the recommendation shall include additional findings that support the conclusion that at least one of the following circumstances applies: A. The property is potentially zoned for the reclassification being requested and conditions have been met that indicate the reclassification is appropriate; B. An adopted subarea plan or area zoning specifies that the property shall be subsequently considered through an individual reclassification application; C. Where a subarea plan has been adopted but subsequent area zoning has not been adopted, that the proposed reclassification or shoreline redesignation is consistent with the adopted subarea plan; or D. The applicant has demonstrated with substantial evidence that: I. Since the last previous area zoning or shoreline environment designation of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other conditions or circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone substantial and material change not anticipated or contemplated in the subarea plan or area zoning; 2. The impacts from the changed conditions or circumstances affect the subject property in a manner and to a degree different than other properties in the vicinity such that area rezoning or redesignation is not appropriate; For the purposes of this subsection, "changed conditions or circumstances" does not include actions taken by the current or former property owners to facilitate a more intense development of the property including but not limited to changing tax limitations, adjusting property lines, extending services, or changing property ownership; 3. For proposals to increase rural residential density, that the proposal meets the criteria in f1 14 Comprehensive Plan policies R-205 through R-209; LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendcll 4. For proposals to increase urban residential density, that the proposal meets the criteria in Comprehensive Plan policies U-118 through U-123; and 5. The requested reclassification or redesignation is in the public interest. (Ord. 14047 § 12, 200 I: Ord. 4461 § IO, 1979). Comment: KCC 21A.24.190 (A), (B), and (C) do not apply to the subject rezone application. The relevant criterion under the additional Examiner Finding is KCC 20.24.190 (D). Prior to the adoption of the 1995 KC Comprehensive Plan and Area Zoning, the property was zoned SR-15,000 which was an urban zone designation that allowed development of property into lots 15,000 square feet in size and allowed/assumed on site septic/drainfields would be provided for the disposal of sewage for new development. With adoption of the 1994 Comprehensive Plan, and 1995 Area Zoning conversion process, the property was rezoned from SR-15000 to R-4. This R-4 zone continued to permit urban residential development on septic/drainfield systems in the Service Planning Area provided that dry sewers would be installed & a future service agreement were signed. Now under the 2000 Comprehensive Plan and Ord. # 14049, both effective as of March 12, 200 I, all new residential development in the urban area must be served by sewer. Providing sewer to this and other properties in the immediate area will require a sewage pump station to facilitate new residential development at either R-4 or R-6 zoning density. As a result, development of the subject property and a pump station will help to make possible new homes on other properties nearby. Additionally, since the last area zoning, the City of Renton annexed and zoned the developing plat of Maplewood Estates for R-5 and R-8. This plat is served by a sewer extension. The plat contains many smaller lots of approximately 4,500 square feet. Subsequently, the rezone to R-8 for the Highland Estates plat of 60 lots was approved by IGng County. N. PLAT STATUTES/CODES: I. If approved with the recommended conditions in this report, the proposed development will comply with the requirements of the County and State Platting Codes and Statutes, and the lots in the proposed subdivision will comply with the minimum dimensional requirements of the zone district. 2. King County Road Standards Section 1.03 -Responsibility to Provide Roadway Improvements: A. Any land development which will impact the service level, safety, or operational efficiency of serving roads or is required by other County code or ordinance to improve such roads shall improve those roads in accordance with these Standards. The extent of off-site improvements to serving roads shall be based on an assessment of the impacts of the proposed land development by the Reviewing Agency ... 15 LOJTY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell 3. RCW 58.17.110 Approval or disapproval of subdivision and dedication-Factors to be considered-Conditions for approval-Finding-Release from damages. (I) The city, town, or county legislative body shall inquire into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of the subdivision and dedication. It shall detem1ine: a) If appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school; and (b) whether the public interest will be served by the subdivision and dedication. (2) A proposed subdivision and dedication shall not be approved unless the city, town, or county legislative body makes written findings that: (a) Appropriate provisions are made for the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds and all other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school; and (b) the public use and interest will be served by the platting of such subdivision and dedication. If it finds that the proposed subdivision and dedication make such appropriate provisions and that the public use and interest will be served, then the legislative body shall approve the proposed subdivision and dedication ... 4. KCC20.24.195 Additional examiner findings -preliminary plats. When the examiner makes a decision regarding an application for a proposed preliminary plat, the decision shall include additional findings as to whether: A. Appropriate provisions are made for the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds and all other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school; and B. The public use and interest will be served by the platting of such subdivision and dedication. (Ord. 12196 § 38, 1996: Ord. 9544 § 16, 1990). 0. ANALYSIS / CONCLUSIONS: I. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21 C, the responsible official of the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) issued a threshold determination - mitigated determination of non-significance (MONS) for the proposed request on December 23, 2002. This determination was based on the review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent documents, resulting in the conclusion that with ~ 16 LOITY401 and LO!P0016 Evendell implementation of mitigation, the proposal would not cause probable significant adverse impacts on the environment. Rezone 2. The proposal is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policy U-114. The proposed rezone would allow the planned density of 5.6 dwellings per acre on site. This density is appropriate for the site, the ultimate build out of the neighborhood at R-4 density or higher has not occurred and many "infilling" opportunities exist within the neighborhood. 3. The rezone & subdivision will be compatible with the character and scale of the other development per Policy U-119. It is recognized that most surrounding properties have not developed to their highest potential use and density. Nearby properties until recently did not have all urban services available (such as sewer) and therefore these properties have developed at only lower densities (generally 1/2 acre lots and greater). Comprehensive Plan Policy U-119 requires that urban area density increases shall not be approved through the rezone process unless "the development will be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhood". The County Council reclassified the neighborhood area surrounding and Evendell to R-4 in 1995, thus imposing as a necessary premise that urban density residential development at the R-4 classification is to be deemed compatible. With respect to further increasing densities to R-6, no incompatibility issues exist directly north, east and south of the east half of the plat as future urban densities are currently in the planning stages. South of the west half, existing residential development at lower densities presents some potential for conflict. This conflict is mitigated, however, by the decision to retain the existing house on a large 26,000-sq. ft. parcel, the location of the drainage/recreation tract and the street design, which will provide neighborhood circulation opportunities between Evendell and parcels west. 4. Potential adverse impacts to environmentally sensitive areas on site and environmental constraints in the vicinity will be adequately mitigated through the King County Code and SEPA. 5. Per Policy U-120, King County has notified the City of Renton and other local agencies of the rezone request and plat. The City concurs that the density proposed is consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan for this Potential Annexation Area. The density does not exceed six dwellings per acre. The City did express concern with the road improvement standards to be used. At this time an interlocal agreement has not been signed between the two jurisdictions by which King County would alternatively recognize City of Renton standards for street improvements. 6. Comprehensive Plan Policy U-121 supports "increases in urban residential density through a rezone ... when the proposal will help resolve traffic, sewer, water, parks or open space 0 17 R7 7. LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evcndell deficiencies in the immediate neighborhood". When new neighborhood infrastructure is made feasible by the additional density requested within a rezone, the potential infrastructure benefits to be derived from the density increase are to be viewed as a supporting rationale for granting the rezone request. In the instant situation, the Evendell application will provide neighborhood infrastructure benefits in the fonn of right-of-way dedication; and road improvements on 1561h A venue Southeast, Southeast 1361h Street and 1601h A venue Southeast. The SE 1361h St. east-west connection between l 56'h Ave. SE and l 60'h Ave. SE is an important connection, providing circulation needed to serve the neighborhood in the future. Currently the only east west access between 156th Ave. SE and 160'h Ave. SE is via SE 128'h St. approximately 2,500 feet to the north and SE 1441h St. approximately 1,900 feet south of this plat. DDES and DOT staff do not anticipate others outside of the neighborhood will use the new connection as a cut through route due to the signal and turn lanes at the intersection of SE 1281h St.. and 156th Ave. SE. Neighborhood circulation is important in providing access for neighbor to neighbor trips, service vehicles, emergency vehicles, school bus routes, and school walking routes without using the arterial road system or long routes. SE 128th St is designated as a principal arterial. Per the King County Road Standards, Section 2.02, the function of a principal arterial is: "Inter-community highways connecting largest community centers and facilities." The function is not to provide a connection between neighborhoods. Section 2.03 of the King County Road Standards describes the function of several Residential Access Streets to provide circulation within neighborhoods. Arterial routes should be preserved to serve the longer distance trips between communities. Given recent rulings of the examiner relative to providing neighborhood circulation within neighborhoods (see L99P3013), it is unlikely that another east-west connection would be built along this corridor as a condition of a future plat. Further, without the rezone and the 70-lot plat approval, this connection will unlikely ever be built unless the county chooses to make it a priority as part of the capital improvement program. The applicant will extend the potential sewer service area to encompass approximately 37 acres north and east of the plat with construct a sewer lift station. These are significant infrastructure improvements that benefit the neighborhood as it converts to urban densities, the costs of which are only feasible for the applicant with the increased density contemplated by the rezone request. Thus, the considerations which underlie policy U-121 apply to this proposal. The reclassification of this property to R-6 will facilitate development that will be reasonably compatible with other nearby development and future development. The rezone will not be detrimental to affected properties and the general public in confonnance with KCC 20.24.180. 18 LOITY401 and LOIPOOl6 Evendell 8. Under the provisions of KCC 20.24.190 (D), additional examiner findings, the applicant has sufficiently demonstrated changed circumstances effecting the site to conclude the reclassification is appropriate and the applicant has demonstrated that the requested reclassification of the subject parcel is in the public interest. Among the circumstances that have changed since the 1995 area-wide zoning is the requirement for sewer service to all urban development. Also, since 1995 is urban level of development taking place in the neighborhood at Maplewood, Highland Estates and other nearby proposed plats with densities greater than 4 dwellings per acre. Further, new areas to the west are now zoned R- 8 within the City of Renton and Unincorporated King County. A further changed circumstance is the proximity of sewer service in the area. These changed circumstances affect the EvendeJJ property in a manner and degree different from other properties in the vicinity due to EvendeJJ 's location adjoining SE I 36th St. and the needed infrastructure on 136th St. (sewer and road improvements). The sewer and road improvements for this rezone/plat are necessary to make this first stage of urban conversion successful, and will provide an infrastructure foundation for further development of other properties consistent with the R-4 designation. 9. The subject subdivision will comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan and will comply with the requirements of the Subdivision and Zoning Codes and other official land use controls of IGng County, based on the recommendation below conditions for final plat approval. P. RECOMMENDATIONS: REZONE Approve zone reclassification of the property from R-4 to R-6, subject to the following: Post-effective Conditions I. SE 136 1h Street from 156'h Ave SE to the west Evendell plat boundary shall be improved to the urban neighborhood coJJector standard; EXCEPT that no sidewalk construction is required on the north side. Twenty-six feet of additional right-of-way shaJJ be dedicated for this improvement. An additional 25-foot right-of-way radius shall also be dedicated at the southeast corner of 156'h Ave SE and SE 136'h St. 2. The west side 160'h Ave SE abutting the subject property shall be improved with an 8-foot paved shoulder. 3. The Applicant shalJ revise the channelization proposed with the off-site improvements currently being constructed in conjunction with the plat of Highland Estates (LOOP0009). 19 PLAT LOJTY401 and LOJPOOJ6 Evcndcll These modifications to the channelization shall incorporate a revision of the current proposed painted 'island' to a southbound left turn lane with at least 60 feet of storage for left turning vehicles to (a) encourage the use of 156th Avenue SE in lieu of 158th Avenue SE and 160th Avenue SE, and (b) mitigate the potential deficient condition that would from southbound left turning vehicles to make legal southbound left turns from the southbound through lane, or, use the painted island as a deceleration and refuge area while waiting for gaps in northbound traffic. Channelization and illumination plans must be submitted to King County Traffic Engineering Section for review and approval of the turn lane channelization. Grant preliminary approval of the subject subdivision, received August 29, 2002, subject to the following conditions of final approval: I. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19 of the King County Code. 2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plat a dedication which includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952. 3. The plat shall comply with the base density (and minimum density) requirements of the R-6 zone classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-6 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, whichever is larger, except that minor revisions to the plat which do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. 4. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended (1993 KCRS). 5. A Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) shall be completed to except out that portion of the rezone area on the far west that is not part of the Evendell plat prior to final plat. 6. The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow standards of Chapter 17 .08 of the King County Code. Joint Use Development Tract H as shown on the plat (Attachment 2) will provide access to Lots 28 and 29. Additionally, it is a future emergency vehicle access tract to and from J 60'h Ave. SE, which the applicant proposes to create in response to concerns raised by the City of Renton. The applicant shall include proposed protocols for the construction and 20 LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendcll maintenance of Tract H, plus any related plat notes, with its engineering plans submittal meeting the following standards: The emergency vehicle access to 1601h Ave. SE shall have a minimum driving surface width of 20 feet, with an all-weather surface capable of supporting 25 tons. Any locking device shall be approved by the Renton Fire Department (KCFD # 25). Chains, cable or bollards will not be permitted. The gate shall be located at least 50 feet from 1601h Ave. SE to allow space for fire apparatus to stop while opening the gate or to wait before entering the public roadway. If these conditions are not met any future residence constructed on Lots 28, 29 and 30 will have to be sprinklered NFP A I 3D. These conditions must be satisfied, unless an alternative is approved by the King County Fire Protection Engineer and Renton Fire Department (KCFD # 25) 7. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and applicable updates adopted by King County. DOES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DOES Engineering Review, shall be shown on the engineering plans. c. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings # on file with ODES and/or the King County Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for individual lot infiltration systems, the systems shall be constructed at the time of the building pennit and shall comply with plans on file." d. The stormwater detention design shall comply with the Level 2 Flow Control requirements per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). e. The storm water control facility shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King County unless portions of the drainage tract are used for required recreation space in accordance with KCC 21A.14.180. 21 LOITY401 and LOJPOOJ6 Evendell 8. Drainage adjustment L02V0024 is approved for this project. All conditions of approval for this adjustment shall be mel upon submillal of the engineering plans. See Allachment 9. 9. A drainage easement for the conveyance from the Tract N drainage facility to 156'h Ave SE shall be provided upon engineering plan submittal. I 0. The following road improvemenls are required to be construcled according to the 1993 King County Road Standards(KCRS): a. The internal access road from SE 1361h St. to the beginning of the internal loop road shall be improved to the urban subcollector standard. b. The internal loop road shall be improved to the urban subaccess road standard with sidewalks on the outside frontage of the loop road. c. SE l 36'h St. FRONT AGE/OFFSITE--The following SE 1361h St. improvement shall be designed in general conformance with the Preliminary Road Improvement Plan received 3/26/2002: The frontage from l 58'h Ave NE to 1601h Ave NE shall be improved lo the urban one-half street standard. Eighteen feet of addilional right-of way shall be dedicated for this improvement. d. e. f. SE 136'" St. frontage from the west plat boundary to 1581h Ave NE shall be improved to the urban neighborhood collector standard; EXCEPT that no sidewalk construction is required on the north side. Twenty feet of additional right-of-way shall be dedicated for this improvement. SE 1361h St. offsite from 1561h Ave SE to the west plat boundary shall be improved to the urban neighborhood collector standard; EXCEPT that no sidewalk construction is required on the north side. Twenty-six feet of additional right-of- way shall be provided for this improvement. An additional 25-foot ri~ht-of-way radius is required at the southeast corner of 1561h Ave SE and SE 1361 St. 1601h Ave SE FRONTAGE: The 1601h Ave SE frontage shall be improved with an 8-foot paved shoulder on the west side. Adequate provisions for road drainage shall be provided. Tracts A,C,F,G,H, and I shall be improved to the joint use driveway standard per Section 3.0 I of the KCRS. Tract A shall include an easement to King County for the maintenance of the Tract N drainage facility. Tract A shall be owned and maintained by the owners of Lots I and 2. Tracts B, D and E shall be improved to the private access tract standard per Section 2.09 of lhe KCRS. 22 LOITY401 and LOJP0016 Evendell g. Per Rezone condition #3, the Applicant shall revise the channelization proposed with the off-site improvements currently being constructed in conjunction with the plat of Highland Estates (LOOP0009). These modifications to the channelization shall incorporate a revision of the current proposed painted 'island' to a southbound left tum lane with at least 60 feet of storage for left turning vehicles to (a) encourage the use of 156th Avenue SE in lieu of 158th Avenue SE and 160th Avenue SE, and (b) mitigate the potential deficient condition that would from southbound left turning vehicles to make legal southbound left turns from the southbound through lane, or, use the painted island as a deceleration and refuge area while waiting for gaps in northbound traffic. Channelization and illumination plans must be submitted to King County Traffic Engineering Section for review and approval of the turn lane channelization. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered according to the variance provisions in Section 1.08 of the KCRS. 11. There shall be no direct vehicular access to or from 1601h Ave. SE from those lots, which abut this street. A note to this effect shall appear on the engineering plans and final plat. 12. Off-site access to the subdivision shall be over a full-width, dedicated and improved road that has been accepted by King County for maintenance. If the proposed access road has not been accepted by King County at the time of recording, then said road shall be fully bonded by the applicant of this subdivision. 13. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final plat recording. 14. The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by the applicable fee ordinance. The applicant has the option to either: (I) pay the MPS fee at final plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building permit application. 15. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the Sensitive Areas Code as outlined in KCC 21 A.24. Preliminary plat review has identified the following specific requirements that apply to this project. All other applicable requirements from KCC 21A.24 shall also be addressed by the applicant. a. This site contains a Class 2 wetland. The majority of the wetland will be protected from alteration during and after construction, with a 50-foot wide buffer around the 23 LOITY401 and LOIP0016 EvendeJJ wetland boundary. An additional 15-foot building setback is required beyond the edge of the buffer. b. A maximum of 200 square feet of wetland will be filled for construction of SE 136th Street. Mitigation shall consist of at least 400 square feet of wetland enhancement to degraded portions of the existing wetland. c. Road improvements for SE 136th Street and 160th Avenue SE will eliminate 6,989 square feet of wetland buffer. Mitigation shall consist of providing at least an equivalent amount of additional buffer in the northeast portion of the site. Reduced impact will result in reduced mitigation. d. The proposed sewer main within the SE 136th Street right-of-way will intrude into the wetland buffer along with the road improvements. In order to protect wetland hydrology: (I) the sewer line shall be installed during the dry season (June through September), and (2) the design shall incorporate the use of pipe bed dams of bentonite or other material at intervals to preclude draining possible subsurface water flows through the gravel pipe bedding. e. Downstream drainage improvements to existing culverts and stormwater conveyances required through the SEPA MONS shall cause no adverse alteration to existing wetlands or streams in the vicinity of the drainage improvements. f. Critical Areas staff shall review engineering plans for the plat and sewer main for conformance with these requirements. 16. The following note shall be shown on the final engineering plan and recorded plat: RESTRICTIONS FOR SENSITIVE AREA TRACTS AND SENSITIVE AREAS AND BUFFERS Dedication of a sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. This interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the land subject to the tract/sensitive area and buffer the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by King County, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. The vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without approval in writing from the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services or its successor agency, unless otherwise provided by law. 24 LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell The common boundary between the tract/sensitive area and buffer and the area of development activity must be marked or otherwise flagged to the satisfaction of King County prior to any clearing, grading, building construction or other development activity on a lot subject to the sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer. The required marking or flagging shall remain in place until all development proposal activities in the vicinity of the sensitive area are completed. No building foundations are allowed beyond the required 15-foot building setback line, unless otherwise provided by law. 17. Suitable recreation space shall be provided consistent with the requirements KCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21A.14. l 90 in providing sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic table[s], benches, etc .. a. A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) shall be submitted for review and approval by DOES and King County Parks prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the engineering plans. This plan shall comply with Ordinance# 14045. b. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. 18. A homeowners' association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction of ODES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation, open space and/or sensitive area tract(s). 19. Street trees shall be included in the design of all road improvements, and shall comply with Section 5.03 of the KCRS and KCC 21 A.16.050: a. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. b. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. c. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. d. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has 25 LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell adop!ed a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. e. The species of trees shall be approved by ODES if located within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. f. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by DOES prior to engineering plan approval. g. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DOES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. A landscape inspection fee shall also be submitted prior to plat recording. The inspection fee is subject to change based on current County fees. 20. The following have been established by SEPA as necessary requirements to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of this development. The applicants shall demonstrate compliance with these items prior to final approval. a. East Drainage Basin: The 160th Ave SE downstream conveyance system shall be upgraded to provide for the I 00-year storm capacity. Downstream driveway culverts/ditches and a cross-culvert under I 60'h Ave. SE shall be improved as follows: Culverts P-117 and P-116 on the west side of 1601h Ave. SE, cross-culvert P-115, and culverts P-114 and P-113 on the east side of 1601h Ave. SE shall be improved as needed. The culvert designations are according to the Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis by Haozous Engineering dated August 26, 2002. To address a related localized flooding condition, bank and channel stabilization are also required in the unopened right-of-way for 162°d Ave. SE, in the vicinity of the easterly line of Lot 12, Rich Lea Crest (address 16046 SE 142°d Street). It is estimated that stabilizing and re-grading approximately 50 to 100 feet of channel, east of 16046 SE 142°d Street, will be adequate to resolve flooding that has occurred in the past location. The culverts and channel described are located from the south site boundary to a distance of approximately 1,700 feet downstream. 26 LOITY401 and LOIPOOl6 Evcndell Level 2 Flow Control design is required for the proposed stonnwater detention facility. A factor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. b. West Drainage Basin: The stonnwater detention facilities shall be designed to the Level 3 Flow Control Standard as described in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). As an option, Level 2 Flow Control with downstream improvements can be proposed according to Core Requirement 2 of the KCSWDM. The minimum Flow Control Standard shall be Level 2. A factor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: I. The subdivision shall conform to KCC 16.82 relating to grading on private property. 2. Development of the subject property may require registration with the Washington State Department of Licensing, Real Estate Division. 3. Preliminary approval of this application does not limit the applicant's responsibility to obtain any required permit or license from the State or other regulatory body. This may include, but is not limited to the following: a. Forest Practice Permit from the Washington State Dept. of Natural Resources. b. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit from WSDOE. c. Water Quality Modification Permit from WSDOE. d. Water Quality Certification (401) Permit from U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers REPORT ATTACHMENTS: I. Map of Rezone from R-4 to R-6 2. R-6 -70 Lot Preliminary Plat 3. R-4 -Alternative 46 Lot Plat 4. Density Calculations For R-6 Plat 5. City of Renton January 20, 2003 Letter 6. City of Renton June 15, 2001 Letter 7. Certificate of Water Availability, May 30, 2001 8. School Information, July 12, 2001 9. SWM Adjustment Approval, L02V0024 TRANSMITTED TO PARTIES LISTED HEREAFTER: 4 CREEKS UAC, ATTN: CLAUDIA DONNELLY PO BOX 3501 RENTON, WA 98056 BORBA, GREG, CURRENT PLANNING SUPERVISOR DDES I LUSD MS: OAK -DE -0100 BRYANT, RONDA, 15406 SE 136TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 CARLSON, MARILYN, 136 I 6 156TH A VENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 27 CASEY, LAURA, WETLAND REVIEW ODES/ SDSS MS: OAK· DE -0100 LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell CITY OF RENTON, A TIN: REBECCA LIND 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 CLAUSSEN,KIM, SR. PLAT PLANNER DOES/ CPLN MS: OAK -DE -0100 COFFIN, RONALD, 16015 SE 135TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059-6828 DAY,SHIRLEY, 14412 167THPLACESE RENTON, WA 98059 DORST AD, ROGER, EVERGREEN EAST REALTY PO BOX 375 REDMOND, WA 98073 HANSON, STEPHEN & YVONNE, 15611 SE 138TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 HARBOUR HOMES, KURT WILSON 1010 S. 336TH ST., SUITE#305 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 HAOZOUSENGINEERING,INC,ATTN: ROBERTDARROW 15428-45THCT MUKILTEO WA 98275 HEMNES, VALERIE, 15627 SE 139TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98058 HIGH, VICTOR & GWENDOLYN, 13405 158TH A VENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 HILL, EDWARD, JUNE & KRISTY, 13527 · 156TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 HILTON, EDWARD & NANCY, 13414 · 158TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 HUGHES, KURT, 15646 SE 138TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 JAQUES, FRED AND HELGA, 13114 158TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 JOHNSTON, LEONARDJ., 16016SE 135TH RENTON, WA 98059 KC EXECUTIVE HORSE COUNCIL, ELEANOR MOON 12230 NE 61ST KIRKLAND, WA 98033 KC HEARING EXAMINERS OFFICE , ATTN: CHERYLE PACKARD MS: BOC -CC. 0850 KEZELE, DON, 15657 SE 137TH PLACE RENTON WA 98059 LANGLEY, KRISTEN, LAND USE TRAFFIC DOES/ CPLN MS: OAK -DE-0100 LEE, JOANN, 13802 160TH A VENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 LEX, TIM & GINA, 13116 158TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 LYMAN, STEVE, 14505 -160TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 MARCY,JERRY,POSTOFFICEBOX575 SEATTLE, WA 98111 MARTIN, FRED & GLORIA, 13019 160TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 MOKIN, BILL, 14404 162ND AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 MUHICH, STEVEN & PERI, 13420 160TH A VENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 NYBLOM, DA VE, 13606 158TH A VE SE RENTON, WA 98059 NIPERT, SALLY, 14004 156TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 NOTT, FLORENCE, 15915 SE 134TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 OLIPHANT, RICHARD & ANITA, 16519 SE 145TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 PETRIE, DA VE, 811 SOUTH 273RD COURT DES MOINES, WA 98198 PLATT, DAVID, 510 PANORAMIC DRIVE CAMANO ISLAND, WA 98282 ROGERS, CAROL, CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DOES/ CPLN MS: OAK -DE-OJ 00 ROLLINGER, MARSHA, I 5646 SE I 38TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 ROMANO, MICHAEL, CENTURIAN DEVEL. SERVICES 22617 8TH DR SE BOTHELL, WA 98021 SCHARER, KAREN, PROJECT MANAGER MS: OAK -DE-0100 DDES/CPLN SCHOLES, GENEY A, 12924 158TH A VE SE RENTON, WA 98059 SCHUSTER, CURTIS G, JOHN L SCOTT REAL ESTATE 12505 BEL-RED RD, STE 212 BELLEVUE WA 98005 SCOBY, CHARLES & VIOLA, 13112 158TH A VE SE RENTON, WA 98059-8531 SIDEBOTHAM, KAREN & JEFFREY, 13004 158TH A VE SE RENTON, WA 98059 SLATON, DANIEL B., 15315 SE 133RD COURT RENTON, WA 98059 STANSBURY, HOW ARD , US LAND DEVL. ASSOC/CENTURION 22617 8TH DR SE BOTHELL, WA 98021 STREIT, PEGGY, 13512 160TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 THORBECK, PENNY, 15650 SE 138TH PL RENTON, WA 98059 WA ST.ECOLOGY DEPT/ WQSW UNIT, A TIN: LINDA MATLOCK PO BOX 47696 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7696 28 WATLER, DA YID, 15635 SE 138TH PL. RENTON, WA 98059 WEST, LARRY, GEO REVIEW DDES/SDSS MS: OAK -DE-0100 WHITI AKER, BRUCE, PRELIMINARY REVIEW ENGINEER DOES/ ERS WILMOT, MR. & MRS., 13900 160TH A VENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 WOLBERG, ALVIN, 16021 SE 136TH STREET RENTON, WA 98059 ZEEK, HAROLD & ELEANOR, 16621 SE 145TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 29 LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evcndell MS: OAK -DE-0100 9f DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ADDENDUM REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER March 6, 2003 -PUBLIC HEARING AT 9:30 AM Hearing Room at DDES 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Phone: (206) 296-6600 REZONE & PROPOSED PLAT OF EVENDELL FILE NO's: L01TY401 & LOIP0016 PROPOSED REZONE ORDINANCE NO: #2003-0032 PROPOSED PLAT ORDINANCE NO. #2003-0031 The purpose of this addendum report is to provide supplementary information regarding schools servicing the property and school impact mitigation measures, as well as provide a set of recommended conditions for the R-4 / 46 lot plat alternative. E. AGENCIES CONT ACTED: REVISE 4. Renton School District: See Allaehmeflt 8 afld comments contained in the Addendum report. ADD 12. Issaquah School District: See Attachment 8 and corrunents contained in report. J. PUBLIC SERVICES: REVISE I. Schools: This proposal has been reviewed under RCW 58.17.110 and IGng County Code 21 A.28 (School Adequacy). a. School Facilities: The subject subdivision will be served by the Renton School District (Maplewood Heights, McKnight, & Hazen High schools) and Issaquah School District (see Attachment 8 of the preliminary report for Issaquah schools serving the site). b. School Capacity: The Renton School Board has not adopted capacity figures which indicate their ability to accommodate additional students. The district therefore anticipates adequate capacity to accommodate the students generated by this proposal. P. LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell Addendum Report Page 2 The Issaquah School Board has adopted capacity figures which indicate their ability to accommodate additional students. The capacity figures for 2004 through 2008 show a at the minimum an excess capacity of 779 per the 2002 Capital Facilities Plan for the District. The figures reveal the district has adequate capacity to accommodate the anticipated students generated by this proposal c. School Impact Fees: No ordinance requiring impact fees for this the Renton school district has been adopted. The Issaquah School District has adopted a fee of $3,924 for each new single family residential unit. A total of 60 dwellings would be added to the Issaquah District. d. School Access: The Renton School District has indicated in a that future students from this subdivision will be bussed from the intersection of Se 1361h St. and 1561h Ave. SE. The Issaquah District has indicated that the future students from this subdivision will be bussed from the intersection of SE l 36ht St. and l 60'h Ave. SE. Curb, gutter and sidewalks are proposed on the south side of SE 136'h St. to provide a walking surface between 160'h Ave. SE and 156 1h Ave. SE. RECOMMENDATIONS: ADD-70 LOT PLAT CONDITIONS ... School Mitgation Fees 21. /0/ Lots within this subdivision east of 1581h Ave. SE are subject to King County Code 2 lA.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected immediately prior to recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. LOITY401 and L01POOl6 Evcndell Addendum Report Page 3 ADD the additional alternative recommendation and conditions which should be considered if the rezone is denied: DOES RECOMMENDATION for L01P0016-ALTERNATIVE 46 LOT PLAT If the reclassification to R-6 is denied, grant preliminary approval of the 46 lot subdivision, received March 26, 2002, subject to the following conditions of final approval: I. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19 of the King County Code. 2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plat a dedication which includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952. 3. The plat shall comply with the base density (and minimum density) requirements of the R-4 zone classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-4 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, whichever is larger, except that minor revisions to the plat which do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. 4. All constmction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended (1993 KCRS). 5. The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow standards of Chapter 17.08 of the King County Code. 6. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number ancVor location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and applicable updates adopted by King County. DOES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any constmction. b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DOES Engineering Review, shall be shown on the engineering plans. c. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the pem1anent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved constmction drawings # on file with DOES ancVor the King /@v LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evendell Addendum Report Page4 County Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for individual lot infiltration systems, the systems shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with plans on file." d. The stonnwater detention design shall comply with the Level 2 Flow Control requirements per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). e. The storm water control facility shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King County unless portions of the drainage tract are used for required recreation space in accordance with KCC 21A.14.180. 7. Drainage adjustment L02V0024 is approved for this project. All conditions of approval for this adjustment shall be met upon submittal of the engineering plans. See Attachment 9. 8. The following road improvements are required to be constructed according to the 1993 King County Road Standards(KCRS): a. SE 137•h St. shall be improved to the urban subcollector standard. b. The internal loop road(l 58"' Pl SE, SE 138'" ST, and 159"' Pl SE) shall be improved to the urban subaccess street standard. c. The short cul-d-sac road off SE 137"' ST shall be improved to the urban minor access street standard. d. FRONTAGE: The frontage along 160"' Ave SE(west side only) shall be improved to the urban neighborhood collector standard. e. Tracts A, B, and D shall be improved to the joint use driveway standard per Section 3.01 of the KCRS. f. Tract C shall be improved to the private access tract standard per Section 2.09 of the KCRS. g. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered according to the variance provisions in Section 1.08 of the KCRS. 9. There shall be no direct vehicular access to or from 160"' Ave. SE from those lots, which abut this street. A note to this effect shall appear on the engineering plans and final plat. I 0. Eighteen feet of right-of way shall be dedicated for future road improvements on SE 136"' St. from 158"' Ave. NE to 160"' Ave. NE. 11. Off-site access to the subdivision shall be over a full-width, dedicated and improved road that has been accepted by King County for maintenance. If the proposed access road has not been /()J LOITY401 and LOIPOOl6 Evendell Addendum Report Page 5 accepted by King County at the time of recording, then said road shall be fully bonded by the applicant of this subdivision. 12. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final plat recording. 13. The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by the applicable fee ordinance. The applicant has the option to either:(]) pay the MPS fee at final plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building permit application. 14. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the Sensitive Areas Code as outlined in KCC 21A.24. Preliminary plat review has identified the following specific requirements that apply to this project. All other applicable requirements from KCC 21A.24 shall also be addressed by the applicant. a. This site contains a Class 2 wetland. The wetland will be protected from alteration during and after construction, with a 50-foot wide buffer around the wetland boundary. An additional 15-foot building setback is required beyond the edge of the buffer. b. Road improvements for I 60'h Avenue SE will eliminate an area of wetland buffer. Mitigation shall consist of providing at least an equivalent area of buffer added to the northeast portion of the site. c. Downstream drainage improvements to existing culverts and stormwater conveyances required through the SEPA MONS shall cause no adverse alteration to existing wetlands or streams in the vicinity of the drainage improvements. d. Critical Areas staff shall review engineering plans for the plat for conformance with these requirements. 15. The following note shall be shown on the final engineering plan and recorded plat: RESTRICTIONS FOR SENSITIVE AREA TRACTS AND SENSillVE AREAS AND BUFFERS Dedication of a sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. This interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the land subject to the tract/sensitive area and /eJ:,/ LOITY401 and LOIP0016 Evcndcll Addendum Report Page 6 buffer the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by King County, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. The vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without approval in writing from the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services or its successor agency, unless otherwise provided by Jaw. The common boundary between the tract/sensitive area and buffer and the area of development activity must be marked or otherwise flagged to the satisfaction of King County prior to any clearing, grading, building construction or other development activity on a Jot subject to the sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer. The required marking or flagging shall remain in place until all development proposal activities in the vicinity of the sensitive area are completed. No building foundations are allowed beyond the required 15-foot building setback line, unless otherwise provided by Jaw. 16. Suitable recreation space shall be provided consistent with the requirements KCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21A.14.190 in providing sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic table[s], benches, etc .. a. A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) shall be submitted for review and approval by ODES and King County Parks prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the engineering plans. This plan shall comply with Ordinance# 14045. b. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plal. 17. A homeowners' association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction of DOES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation, open space and/or sensitive area tract(s). 18. Street trees shall be included in the design of all road improvements, and shall comply with Section 5.03 of the KCRS and KCC 21A.16.050: a. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. b. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation detennines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. c. If King County detennines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. -~7 LOITY401 and LOI POOl6 Evendell Addendum Report Page 7 d. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. e. The species of trees shall be approved by ODES if located within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstmct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. f. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by ODES prior to engineering plan approval. g. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after ODES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. A landscape inspection fee shall also be submitted prior to plat recording. The inspection fee is subject to change based on current County fees. School Mitigation Fees 19. Lots within this subdivision east of 158th Ave. SE are subject to King County Code 21A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected immediately prior to recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. 20. The following have been established by SEPA as necessary requirements to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of this development. The applicants shall demonstrate compliance with these items prior to final approval. a. East Drainage Basin: The 160th Ave. SE downstream conveyance system shall be upgraded to provide for the I 00-year storm capacity. Downstream driveway culverts/ditches and a cross-culvert under 160th Ave. SE shall be improved as follows: Culverts P-117 and P-116 on the west side of 160th Ave. SE, cross- culvert P-115, and culverts P-114 and P-113 on the east side of 160th Ave. SE shall be improved as needed. The culvert designations are according to the Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis by Haozous Engineering dated August 26, 2002. To address a related localized flooding /eJ~ LOITY401 and LOIPOOl6 Evendell Addendum Report Page 8 condition, bank and channel stabilization are also required in the unopened right-of-way for 162"' Ave. SE, in the vicinity of the easterly line of Lot 12, Rich Lea Crest (address 16046 SE 142 00 Street). It is estimated that stabilizing and re-grading approximately 50 to I 00 feet of channel, east of 16046 SE 14200 Street, will be adequate to resolve flooding that has occurred in the past location. The culverts and channel described are located from the south site boundary to a distance of approximately 1,700 feet downstream. Level 2 Flow Control design is required for the proposed stom1water detention facility. A factor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. b. West Drainage Basin: The storrnwater detention facilities shall be designed to the Level 3 Flow Control Standard as described in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). As an option, Level 2 Flow Control with downstream improvements can be proposed according to Core Requirement 2 of the KCSWDM. The minimum Flow Control Standard shall be Level 2. A factor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. DOES Revised Recommendation/Additional Conditions LOIP0016 / Evendell 70 Lot Plat 21. Lots within this subdivision east of 158 1 h Ave. SE are subject to l(jng County Code 21 A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected immediately prior to recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. 22. The drip line of trees off-site west of proposed Lots 12-19 shall be established and easement(s) shall be placed over drip line area(s) on the lots of the subject plat. Easement area within the drip line shall be left in a natural state and no grading, placement structures or other improvements shall be allowed. Establishment of the drip line area shall be completed at the time of engineering review. 23. A pedestrian access easement between 1581h Place SE and I 601h Ave. SE shall be provided over either Tracts H or L (Tracts as shown on Exhibit 7a.). The easement shall have a minimum IO foot width and be improved with a 5 foot wide all weather paved surface. 3/10/03 • OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 850 Union Bank of California Building 900 Fourth A venue Seattle, Washington 98164 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 • March 28, 2003 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE KING COUNTY COUNCIL ON APPLICATION FOR REZONE AND ALTERNATIVE APPLICATIONS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File Nos. L01P0016 & L01TY401 Proposed Ordinance Nos. 2003-0031 & 2003-0032 EVENDELL REZONE AND SUBDIVISION Rezone and Alternative Preliminary Plat Applications Location: Applicant: Intervenors: South of SE 136"' between 156th Ave. SE and 160th Ave. SE US Land Development Association/Centurion, represented by Mike Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 -8'h Drive Southeast Bothell, WA 98021 Telephone: (425) 486-2563 Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Evendell, represented by Gwendolyn High 13405 -158"' Avenue Southeast Renton, WA 98059 . and Marsha Rollinger 15646 Southeast I 38'h Place Renton, WA 98059 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services Land use Services Division, represented by Karen Scharer 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Telephone: (206) 296-7114 Facsimile: (206) 296-7055 LOJPOOl6/LOJTY401-Even. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS: APPLICATION FOR RECLASSIFICATION (REZONE) Department's Preliminary Recommendation: Department's Final Recommendation: Exmniner: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION (70 LOT ALTERNATIVE) Department's Preliminary Recommendation: • Approve, subject to conditions Approve, subject to conditions Deny Approve, subject to conditions 2 Department's Final Recommendation: Examiner: Approve, subject to conditions (modified) Deny PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION (46LOT ALTERNATIVE) Department's Preliminary Recommendation: Department's Final Recommendation: Examiner: EXAMINER PROCEEDINGS: Hearing Opened: Hearing Closed: Approve, subject to conditions Approve, subject to conditions (modified) Approve, subject to conditions (modified) March 6, 2003 March I 0, 2003 Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in the attached rninutes. A verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the office of the King County Hearing Examiner. ISSUESrfOPICS ADDRESSED: • Comprehensive Plan Policies U-114, U-120, U-122 • Zone Reclassification Criteria • Changed Conditions or Circumstances • Neighborhood Compatibility • Tree Protection • Traffic Circulation and Impact Mitigation SUMMARY: Deny the application for a reclassification. Deny the application for the 70 lot subdivision as inconsistent with the current zoning. Approve the application for a 46 lot subdivision on 11.39 acres, subject to conditions. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: LOl POOJ 6/LOITY 401-Evendell • REQUEST FOR RECLASSIFICATION FINDINGS: I. GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner: Representative: Location: Acreage (Reclassification): Acreage (70 lot Plat): Acreage (46 lot Plat): Zoning: Proposed Zone: Proposed Use: Proposed Density(70 lot plat): Density (46 lot alternative): Lot Size (70 lot Plat): Lot Size (46 Lot Alternative): Sewage Disposal: Water Supply: Fire District: School District: Complete Application Date: Threshold Determination: Date of Issuance: King County Permits: Permit Contact: Community Plan: Drainage Subbasin: Section/Township/Range: Assessor Parcel nos.: U.S. Land Development Association P.O. Box 22200 Seattle, WA 98122 Michael Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 8'h Dr. SE, Bothell, WA 98021 Phone: 425-486-2563 Facsimile: (425) 486-3273 e-mail: michael.j.romano@gte.net Lying south of SE 136th St. between 156'h Ave. SE and 160th Ave. SE. 13 acres 12.43 acres 11.39 acres R-4 R-6 Single-family residential 5.6 dwelling units per acre (7.4 per net acre) 4 dwelling units per acre (5.2 per net acre) 3,900 to 6,600 square feet 5,400 to 14,000 square feet City of Renton King County Water District #90 King County Fire District #25 Issaquah September 20, 200 I Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) December 23, 2002 Rezone & Subdivision Karen Scharer, Project Mgr JI, Current Planning, LUSD Phone no. 296-7114, e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Newcastle Lower Cedar River SE 14-23-05 142305 9022 & 9009 2. The Subdivision Technical Committee (STC) of King County conducted an on-site examination of the subject property. The STC discussed the proposed development with the applicant to clarify technical details of the application, and to determine the compatibility of this project with applicable King County plans, codes, and other official documents regulating this development. As a result of discussions, the applicant presented the STC with a conceptual build out plan of the immediate neighborhood, revised plans for frontage road improvements, and submitted a revised traffic study. The conceptual build out plan provided by the Applicant to DOES does not reflect the intentions or desires of the current owners of the properties shown. 3 LOIP0016/LOITY401-Eve. Copies of drainage claims which have been submitted to King County for problems in the area were provided to the applicant, and an updated Level 3 drainage report was submitted December 9, 2002. 3. Under KCC 20.20.070, the request for rezone is not vested under regulations in effect at the time of complete rezone application. Vesting to zoning can only occur after the zone classification becomes effective. The 76 lot plat application is based on the requested rezone to R-6; therefore the 76 lot plat application is not vested. The applicant's 46 lot alternative plat application is vested under the existing R-4 zone. 4. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C, the responsible official of the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) issued a mitigated determination of environmental non-significance (MDNS) for the proposed development on December 23, 2002. This determination was based on the review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent documents, resulting in the conclusion that the proposal would not cause probable significant adverse impacts on the environment if implemented with the required mitigation for the proposal. The MDNS applies to the proposed reclassification, 70 lot plat proposal, and alternative 46 lot plat proposal. Agencies, affected Native American tribes and the public were offered the opportunity to comment on or appeal the determination for 21 days. The MDNS was not appealed by any party, including the applicant, and is incorporated as part of the applicant's proposal. The MONS states: The following mitigation measures shall be attached as conditions of permit issuance. These mitigation measures are consistent with policies, plans, rules, or regulations designated by KCC 20.44.080 as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority and in effect when this threshold determination is issued. Key sources of substantive authority for each mitigation measure are in parentheses; however, other sources of substantive authority may exist but are not expressly listed. A. East Drainage Basin: The 160th Ave SE downstream conveyance system shall be upgraded to provide for the JOO-year storm capacity. Downstream driveway culverts/ditches and a cross- culvert under 16(/h Ave. SE shall be improved as follows: Culverts P-117 and P-116 on the west side of 16(/h Ave. SE, cross-culvert P-115, and culverts P-114 and P-113 on the east side of /6(/• Ave. SE shall be improved as needed. The culvert designations are according to the Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis by Haozous Engineering dated August 26, 2002. To address a related localized flooding condition, bank and channel stabilization are also required in the unopened right-of way for 162"d Ave. SE, in the vicinity of the easterly line of Lot 12, Rich Lea Crest (address 16046 SE 142"d Street). It is estimated that stabilizing and re-grading approximately 50 to JOO feet of channel, east of 16046 SE 142"d Street, will be adequate to resolve flooding that has occurred in the past location. The culverts and channel described are located from the south site boundary to a distance of approximately 1,700Jeet downstream. Level 2 Flow Control design is required for the proposed stormwater detention facility. A factor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. 4 LO I P00! 6/LO!TY 401-Evenclell • • 5. A. B. \Vest Drainage Basin: The stormwater detention facilities shall be designed to the Level 3 Flow Control Standard as described in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual ( KCS\VDM). As an option, Level 2 Flow Control with downstream improvements can be proposed according to Core Requirement 2 of the KCS\VDM. The minimum Flow Control Standard shall be Level 2. A factor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. {Comprehensive Plan Policies U-109, E-126, F-254 & F-255; RC\V 58.17.1 JO] Topography: The site is relatively level with a 20-foot difference in elevation from the north central area to the southwest and to the southeast comers of the site. B. Soils: Surface soils on this site per King County Soil Survey, 1973 include: AgC -Alderwood gravely, sandy loam; 6-15 % slopes. Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil type has a moderate limitation for low building foundations due to a seasonally high water table, and severe limitations for septic tank filter fields due to very slow permeability in the substratum. C. Sensitive Areas: There is a Class II Wetland located on the northeast portion of the site. The 17,162-sq.·ft. wetland is classified as palustrine, forested, seasonally flooded/saturnted and as palustrine, emergent, seasonally flooded. Road improvements to SE I 36'h Street would require filling of 200-sq. fl of. wetland, for which 400-sq. ft. of wetland enhancement is proposed as mitigation. Road improvements will also impact 6,989-sq. ft. of wetland buffer. Additional buffer area in the NE corner of the site could provide mitigation at a ratio equal to or greater than 2 to I. Improvements to the downstream drainage system will have to be reviewed to ensure that no wetlands are being drained or flooded as a result, no streams placed in pipes, and no streams damaged by increased flows. Enlarging culverts in sensitive areas, if any, requires clearing and grading permit(s). D. Hydrography: A preliminary June 15, 200 I, technical information report was prepared by Haozous Engineering, P.S. on_June 15, 2001. Subsequently a Level 3 Downstream Analysis was submitted August 26, 2002, and a Level Three Addendum was submitted December 5, 2002. The site is within the Orting Hills subbasin of the Cedar River watershed. Flooding has occurred in the past along downstream conveyance structures from the site on I 60'h Ave. SE, on I 56"' Ave. SE, and on nearby properties. These drainage issues are documented in the Level Three Downstream Analyses and Addendum and are addressed by mitigating conditions established in the MONS. E. Vegetation: The westerly 2.5 acres is mostly covered by pasture with some trees. More than half of the easterly I I acres is wooded with a conifer upland forest, primarily Douglas fir. The far south of the parcel is developed with pasture; the north central area has been partially cleared as yard area associated with the home 5 LOIPOOl6/LOITY401-Even. • fronting 156'" Avenue SE. The soulh central area includes deciduous trees and native shrubs. F. Wildlife: A wildlife study of the site was undertaken in conjunction with the wetland evaluation and delineation in 200 I. A large variety of small birds and animals were observed on site. Black tail deer and ruffed grouse, both "Priority Species" of Washington State, were observed. A single "State Candidate" species, the pileated woodpecker, was observed to utilize the forested wetland area along with adjacent upland forested area onsite. None of the species identified in the applicant's report are required to be protected in the urban designated area of the County. However with preservation of the wetland and a 50-foot buffer, some habitat will be retained on the site. Additional investigation was made by DDES environmental scientists and the Applicant's consulting biologist in March, 2003, to review the site in response to assertions that a red tail hawk nest exists on the site. The preponderance of the evidence is that there are no red tail hawk or other raptor nests on the subject property. 6. The subject property is within an area east of Renton known as Brierwood, in the southern portion of the Newcastle Community Plan area. The Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council serves the area under the King County Citizen Participation Initiative. The area within which the property is located is designated "urban residential, 4-12 dwelling units per acre", by the King County Comprehensive Plan. The zoning for the subject property and the surrounding area, generally extending from SE 128"' on the north to SE 144'" and beyond on the south, and from Renton on the west to 168"' Avenue SE and beyond to the east, is zoned R-4. The principle exception is the J;lat of Highland Estates, 60 lots on 8.67 acres lying between 152"' Avenue SE and 154 Avenue SE, on the south side of SE 136'" Street. Highland Estates was reclassified from R-4 to R-8 in 2001. Its northwest comer is adjacent to 218 lots under development within the plat of Maplewood in the City of Renton. The southern portion of the plat of Maplewood, which is the portion nearest io Highland Estates, was zoned R-8 by Renton. In 200 I, it was being developed with an average lot size of 4,500 square feet in the area closest to the Highland Estates property. Directly west of the Highland Estates site is an undeveloped King County park. Parcels lying to the north were sparsely developed in 2001, and were expected to convert to urban densities. The Examiner in that case also found a potential for higher urban density redevelopment of parcels lying east and southeast of Highland Estates. The neighborhood lying to the south of Highland Estates contained newer residential properties, which were found unlikely to redevelop in the near future. Most of those properties are approximately 'A acre in size. Impact on the properties to the south was mitigated by not opening 15200 Avenue SE, so as to insulate the lower density neighborhood to the southwest from the impacts of higher density associated with Maplewood and Highland Estates. 6 LOJ POOi 6/LOI TY 401-Evendell • Maplewood brought sewer into the neighborhood, which could be extended lo serve Highland Estates, and road and traffic requirements for the two plats were found to be interconnected. 7. The developer of the subject property proposes to build a sewer pump station, dedicate right- of-way, construct roads, and make drainage improvements in conjunction with the 70 Jot proposed plat, all of which will facilitate urban development in the area. Comprehensive Plan policy U-122 supports increases in urban residential density through a rezone or through density transfers when the proposal will help resolve traffic, sewer, water, parks or open space deficiencies in the immediate neighborhood. DDES relies primarily on Policy U-122 as justification for recommending reclassification of the property to R-6. Most of the same improvements also would be built to support the 46 lot alternative plat proposed under the existing R-4 zone classification. The impacts from development of 46 lots require similar sewer and surface water drainage improvements, which address major concerns in the area. Recreation and open space deficiencies are met in the same manner by both proposed plats, with only proportionate differences, based on the fewer number of Jots in the.46 Jot alternative. Neighborhood traffic circulation is the one urban infrastructure concern which is addressed differently by the two plat proposals. The King County Department of Transportation and DOES have identified a need for an east-west street connection from I 56'h Avenue SE to 160'h Avenue SE, between SE 128'h Street and SE 144"' Street. SE 136'h Street is the most viable option for that connection because of its existing 30 foot wide public right-of-way from J 56"' Avenue SE to I 60'h Avenue SE. The Applicant would agree to provide additional right-of-way , varying from I 8 feet to 25 feet, and improvements that would open SE 136"' Street from I 56'h A venue SE to l 60'h Avenue SE, if the 70 lot plat is approved. If the zone reclassification and 70 lot plat are denied, the developer objects to any requirement for dedication of right-of-way or construction of improvements to provide plat access and neighborhood traffic circulation by way of SE I 36"' Street. DDES nonetheless recommends dedication of 18 feet of right-of-way for SE 136"' Street along the frontage of the 46 lot plat, and the Examiner also recommends improvements to the right-of-way to mitigate the impacts of that plat (see finding no. 2 at page I 0). 8. KCC 21A.44.060 provides that a zone reclassification shall be granted only if the applicant demonstrates that the proposal complies with the criteria for approval specified in KCC 20.24. I 80 and I 90, and is consistent with the comprehensive plan and applicable community and functional plans. 9. KCC 20.24. I 80 addresses the requirement for hearing examiner findings and conclusions generally, including a requirement for a conclusion that the examiner's recommendation "will not be unreasonably incompatible with or detrimental to affected properties and the general public." KCC 20.24.180. 10. KCC 20.24.190 addresses applications for reclassifications specifically. It requires that an Examiner recommendation for reclassification of property include findings that support at least one of the circumstances described in that section. The portion of the section applicable to this proceeding is subpart "D", which provides: 'The applicant has demonstrated with substantial evidence that: J. Since the last previous area zoning or shoreline environment designation of the subject property, authorized public improvements, pem1i1ted private 7 LOIP0016/LOITY401-Eve. • development or other conditions or circumstances affecting lhe subject property have undergone substantial and material change nol anlicipaled or contemplated in lhe subarea plan or·area zoning; 2. The impacts from the changed conditions or circumstances affect the subject property in a manner and lo a degree different than other properties in the vicinity such that area rezoning or redesignalion is not appropriate; For !he purposes of !his subsection, "changed conditions or circumstances" does not include actions taken by the current or former property owners 10 facilitate a more intense development of the property including but not limited to changing tax limilalions, adjusting property lines, extending services, or changing property ownership; 3. For proposals to increase rural residential density, that the proposal meets the criteria in Comprehensive Plan polic;.ies R-205 through R-209; 4. For proposals lo increase urban residential density, that the proposal meets the criteria in Comprehensive Plan policies U-118 through U-123; and 5. The requested reclassification or redesignation is in the public interest. (Ord. 14047 § 12, 2001: Ord. 4461 § 10, 1979). 11. R-4 is the zoning applied to this area by the King County Council. The 1994 Comprehensive Plan and 1995 Area Zoning changed the zoning in this vicinity from SR-15,000 lo R-4. That zoning was reaffirmed in 2001 with the adoption of the 2000 King County Comprehensive Plan amendments. "Official zoning ... is co11tained in the SITUS file and is depicted on the official zoning maps, as maintained by the Department of Development and Environmental Services." Ordinance 14044, Section 3, Febmary 12, 2001. The current R-4 zone classification is consistent with the Urban Land Use policies of the King County Comprehensive Plan. 12. Existing development in the area surrounding Evendell is generally on lots ranging from 15,000 square feel lo I 14 acres, with a few smaller and a few larger. Redevelopment and infill will occur over time in much of the area, creating smaller lots, but a substantial portion of the area will remain as currently developed for the indefinite fun,re. The general character of existing development is individually built homes, with yards, gardens, trees and some pasture area and outbuildings, generating an overall impression of a suburban or somewhat mral area. The density of development permitted by the R-4 zone classification is greater than that which presently exists in the area. The existing R-4 zone classification provides a base density of 4 dwelling units per acre and allows a maximum of 6 dwelling units per acre. Maximum impervious surface allowed for a development within the R-4 zone is 55%. The R-6 zone classification requested by the Applicant provides a base density of 6 dwelling units per acre, a maximum density of 9 dwelling units per acre, and maximum impervious surface of 75% of the sile. 13. Since the last previous area zoning, the approval and commencement of constmction of the proposed plats of Maplewood and Highland Estates have brought sewer closer to the subject property. An additional road connection has been opened lo the west and north, by way of 8 LOIP0016/LOITY401-Evendell • • SE 136'h Street, which now connects to SE 128'" Street at 148'h Avenue SE. The subject property, however, has three pre-existing direct connections to SE 128'h Street, by way of I 56'h Avenue SE, 158'" Avenue SE and I 60'h Avenue SE, which have remained unchanged. The greater proximity of sewer service allows for development of the subject property at the R-4 pennitted density, as well as at the higher density requested by the Applicant. The King County Comprehensive Plan requires that property in the R-4 zone classification be developed with sewers, indicating that the Council's adoption and retention of the R-4 zone classification anticipated the availability of sewers in the area. There is no evidence that the closer proximity of sewers was not anticipated at the time of the last area zoning, or that it affects the subject property in a manner and to a degree different than other properties in the vicinity. CONCLUSIONS: I. The Applicant has not demonstrated with substantial evidence that authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other conditions or circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone substantial and material change since the last previous area zoning which were not anticipated or contemplated by that area zoning. 2. The applicant has not demonstrated with substantial evidence that impacts from any conditions or circumstances that have changed since the last previous area zoning affect the · subject property in a manner and to a degree different than other properties in the vicinity. Any reclassification of the subject property should be considered legislatively in conjunction with consideration of the appropriate zoning for the area within which the subject property is located. 3. The proposal partially meets the purpose of Comprehensive Plan Policy U 122 that supports increases in density to help resolve traffic circulation deficiencies in the immediate neighborhood. However, reclassification of the subject property to R-6 would be inconsistent with policy U-120, which provides that, "King County shall not approve proposed zoning changes to increase density within the urban area unless: a. The development will be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhood; ... " 4. Reclassification of the Highland Estates property is distinguished from this application by the · facts of that case, particularly its location adjacent to the development of 4,500 square foot lots in the City of Renton, the interconnection and overlapping of the road improvements necessary for the development of Maplewood and Highland Estates, and the greater separation of Highland Estates from fully developed properties on larger lots. Reclassification of ihe property under consideration in this case would result in I 3 acres of R- 6 zoned property entirely surrounded by R-4 zoned property. 5. The application for a reclassification of the subject property should be denied. RECOMMENDATION: DENY the application for reclassification. 9 LO!P0016/LOITY401-Eve. • APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL (70 LOT PROPOSAL) FINDINGS: 1. To the extent applicable, the findings set forth above with respect to the application for reclassification are incorporated herein as if fully set forth. 2. The Applicant proposes to develop 70 lols on 12.43 acres, with a density of 5.63 dwelling uni ls per acre. The base density of !he R-4 zone permits development of not more than 4 dwelling units per acre, or a total of 50 units, unless augmented by density bonuses or development credits transferred from other sites. No such augmentations are incorporated in the proposal. CONCLUSIONS: I. The proposed plat exceeds the density allowed for the site by the King County Zoning Code. 2. The application for preliminary plat approval should be DENIED. RECOMMENDATION: Deny the application for preliminary approval of the proposed plat of 70 lots, received March 26, 2002. APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL (46 LOT ALTERNATIVE) FINDINGS: I. To the extent applicable, the findings set forth above with respect to the application for reclassification are incorporated herein as if fully set forth. 2. The proposed development of 46 lots on 11.39 acres is bounded by SE 136th Street on the north (from 158th Avenue SE to 160th Avenue SE), and 160'" A venue SE on the east. SE 136th Street is an unimproved, 30 foot wide, county right-of-way bet\veen 156'" Avenue SE and 160th Avenue SE, with a paved area abutting the proposed plat at the intersection with 158th A venue SE. 160th Avenue SE is a two lane neighborhood collector that runs from SE 125th Street to SE 144th Street. The roadway width is approximately 24 feet, with a paved shoulder on the east side of the roadway. It is unstriped. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The existing construction of 160th Avenue SE is a rural design. 158th Avenue SE is also a two-lane neighborhood collector, similar to 160th Avenue SE, but with little or no dirt shoulders on either side of the roadway. The posted speed limit on 158th Avenue SE is also 25 mph. Traffic to and from the proposed development is proposed by the Applicant to have access only to 160th Avenue SE. The intersection of 160'" Avenue SE and SE I 28th Street, a 10 LOIP0016/LOITY401-Evendell • • principle arterial, would be the principle route for traffic to and from this plat to the north and west. Level of service at SE I 28'h Street and I 60'h Avenue SE was projected to be "E" for north bound left turns during peak hours for the 70 lot plat, which would have had an alternative route through a signalized intersection (156"' Avenue SE and SE J28'h Street) to the north and west. The level of service for that traffic movement for this proposal during the AM peak hour does not appear to have been analyzed. Traffic circulation to and from the subject property, and neighborhood traffic circulation, would be improved by the provision of alternative routes (158"' Avenue SE currently and 156"' Avenue SE in the future), so that residents of the site could avoid using 160'h Avenue SE for congested traffic movements. Dedication and improvement of right-of-way along SE J 36'h Street adjacent to this plat will provide for the enhanced safety and welfare of the residents of this plat and the public. Dedication and improvements consistent with King County Road Standards for an urban subcollector would be proportionate to the impacts of this plat. The Applicant should have the opportunity, if he chooses, to modify the traffic circulation within the plat to provide a direct access to SE 136"' Street, as well as I 60'h Avenue SE. · As properties in the area are developed or redeveloped to urban densities, improvement of street frontage to urban standards is a reasonable and proportionate requirement to provide traffic circulation for the increasing population of the area. The King County Road Standards, Section 1.03, provides that any land development which will impact the service level, safety, or operational efficiency of serving roads ... shall improve those roads in accordance with these standards. 3. The subject subdivision will be served by the Issaquah School District, which has adopted capacity figures which indicate their ability to accommodate additional students. Students living in the proposed plat would be bussed to and from all schools. The Issaquah School District has adopted a fee of $3,924 for each new single-family residential unit, as a school impact fee. Forty six dwelling units would be added by the proposal to the Issaquah School District. 4. Adequacy of Arterial Roads: This proposal has been reviewed under the criteria in King County Code 14.70, Transportation Concurrency Management; 14.80, Intersection Standards; and King County Code 14.75; Mitigation Payment System. a. King County Code 14.70 -Transportation Concurrency Management: The Transportation Certificate of Concurrency indicates that transportation improvements or strategies will be in place at the time of development, or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies within six (6) years, according to RCW 36.70A.070(6). b. King County Code 14.80-Intersection Standards: If an alternative route to SE 128"' Street, other than I 60'h Avenue SE, is provided, the existing arterial system will accommodate the increased traffic volume generated by this proposal. If 160"' Avenue SE were to be the only route to SE 128"' Street, there is not sufficient information in the record to determine whether or not the intersection of 160"' Avenue SE and SE l 28'h Street would meet county standards during the AM peak hour with.this proposed development. 11 LOIP0016/LOITY401-Even. • c. King County Code 14.75 -Mitigation Payment System: King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), requires the payment of a traffic impact mitigation fee (MPS fee) and an administration fee for each single family residential lot or unit created. MPS fees are determined by the zone in which the site is located. This site is in Zone 452 per the MPS/Quarter section list. MPS fees may be paid at the time of final plat recording, or deferred until building permits are issued. The amount of the fee will be determined by the applicable fee ordinance at the time the fee is collected. 5. The nearest public park is located on the soulhwest comer of 152"• Avenue SE and SE 136"' Street. The Applicant has proposed on-site recreation in combination with the on-site detention facility at the southeast comer of the property, and a separate recreation tract adjacent to ihe north of the combination detention/recreation tract. The details of improvements will be designed and submitted for approval prior to recording the final plat. The area contained in proposed tracts E and F appear sufficient to meet the minimum requirements of KCC 2 IA.14.180. 6. Fire Protection: The Certificate of Water Availability from Water District 90 indicates that water is presently available to the site in sufficient quantity to satisfy King County Fire Flow Standards. Prior to final recording of the plat, the water service facilities must be reviewed and approved per King County Fire Flow Standards. 7. Sewage Disposal: A Certificate of Sewer Availability, dated May 18, 2001 indicates the city's capability to serve the proposed development (see Attachment 6). A sewage pump station will be constructed on the southeast comer of the plat as the property currently can nol be served by gravity now. By providing a pump station, approximately 37 acres in the immediate area will have sewer available. The existing sewer line will be extended east along SE 136'h Street lo the subject property to provide connection to Renton's sewer system. 8. Water Supply: The applicant proposes to serve the subject subdivision with water from Water District 90. A Certificate of Water Availability, dated May 30, 2001, indicates this district's capability to serve the proposed development (see Attachment 7). 9. Neighbors on adjacent lots to the west of the proposed plat expressed concerns that trees on their lots would be affected by development activity on the site of the proposal. A 50-foot wide buffer area was requested by the neighbors; an easement protecting the drip line of affected trees near the property line was recommended by the Department. No authority was cited to the Examiner which supports the imposition of a burden on the Applicant's property to protect trees on adjoining properties. CONCLUSIONS: I. If approved subject to the conditions recommended below, the proposed subdivision will comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision and Zoning Codes, and other official land use controls and policies of King County. 2. If approved subject to the conditions recommended below, this proposed subdivision will make appropriate provision for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces, for drainage ways, streets, other public ways, transit stops, potable water 12 LO!P0016/LO!TY40!-Evendell \..._ • supply, sanitary wastes, parks and recreations, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and safe walking conditions for students who only walk to school; and it will serve the public use and interest. 3. The conditions for final plat approval recommended below are in the public interest and are reasonable requirements to mitigate the impacts of this development upon the environment. 4. The dedications of land or easements within and adjacent to the proposed plat, as reconunended by the conditions for final plat approval or as shown on the proposed preliminary plat submitted by the applicant, are reasonable and necessary as a direct result of the development of this proposed plat, and are proportionate to the impacts of the development. 5. This proposal is subject to the mitigated detennination of environmental non-significance issued December 23, 2002. The conditions of that MDNS must be implemented as conditions of this preliminary plat approval. The impacts of the culvert and channel improvements required in the east drainage basin, for a distance approximately 1,700 downstream from the plat, together with the change in flow volume resulting from development of the subject property, should be analyzed by the Applicant and reviewed by DDES to determine the impacts, if any, downstream from the improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed of Evendell, 46 lot alternative, received March 26, 2002 subject to the following conditions of final plat approval: I. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title I 9 of the King County Code. 2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plat a dedication which includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952. 3. The plat shall comply with the base density (and minimum density) requirements of the R-4 zone classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-4 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, whichever is larger. The plat layout may be revised to provide vehicular access to SE 136th Street as well as I 60th Avenue SE. Other minor revisions to the plat which do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. 4. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. I I 187, as amended ( I 993 KCRS), except to the extent that variances from those standards are approved by the County Road Engineer. 5. The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow standards of Chapter 17.08 of the King County Code. 13 LOJPOOl6/LOITY401-Even. • 6. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and applicable updates adopted by King County. DDES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any constrnction. b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DDES Engineering Review, shall be shown on the engineering plans. c. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved constrnction drawings# on file with DDES and/or the King County Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constrncted and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for individual lot infiltration systems, the systems shall be constrncted at the time of the building permit and shall comply with plans on file." d. The stormwater detention design shall comply with the Level 2 Flow Control requirements per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). e. The storm water control facility shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King County unless portions of the drainage tract are used for required recreation space in accordance with KCC 21A.14.180. 7. Drainage adjustment L02V0024 is approved for this project. All conditions of approval for this adjustment shall be met upon subminal of the engineering plans. 8. The following road improvements are required to be constrncted according to the 1993 King County Road Standards(KCRS): a. SE 137" St. shall be improved to the urban subcollector standard. b. The internal loop road(l58" Pl SE, SE 138" ST, and 159th Pl SE) shall be improved to the urban subaccess street standard. c. The short cul-d-sac road off SE 137th ST shall be improved to the urban minor access street standard, unless this street is extended to SE 136th Street, in which event it shall be improved to the urban subcollector standard. d. FRONTAGE: Eighteen feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated along the plat frontage on SE 136" Street (from 1581 • Avenue SE to 160" Avenue SE). The frontage along SE 136th Street (south side only) and 160th Ave SE (west side only) shall be improved to the urban neighborhood collector standard. 14 LOI POOi 6/LOI TY 401-Evendell • The SE 136"' Street frontage from 1581h A venue SE to I 60"' A venue SE shall be improved to the urban Y2 street standard, except that no sidewalk shall be required to be constmcted on the north side. e. Tracts A, B, and D shall be improved to the joint use driveway standard per Section 3.0 I of the KCRS. f. Tract C shall be improved to the private access tract standard per Section 2.09 of the KCRS. g. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered according to the variance provisions in Section 1.08 of the KCRS. 9. There shall be no direct vehicular access to or from 1601h Ave. SE from those lots, which abut this street. A note to this effect shall appear on the engineering plans and final plat. The Applicant may redesign the plat to allow direct access to SE 136th Street for those lots which abut SE 136"' Street and do not·abut the internal street system. (Joint use driveway tracts and· pipe stems shall not be considered as abutting the internal street system) IO. (See condition 8 above) 11. Off-site access to the subdivision shall be over a full-width, dedicated and improved road that has been accepted by King County for maintenance. If the proposed access road has not been accepted by King County at the time of recording, then said road shall be fully bonded by the applicant of this subdivision. 12. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final plat recording. 13. The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by the applicable fee ordinance. The applicant has the option to either: ( I) pay the MPS fee at final plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building pennit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building permit application. 14. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the Sensitive Areas Code as outlined in KCC 21A.24. Preliminary plat review has identified the following specific requirements that apply to this project. All other applicable requirements from KCC 21 A.24 shall also be addressed by the applicant. a. This site contains a Class 2 wetland. The wetland will be protected from alteration during and after construction, with a 50-foot wide buffer around the wetland boundary. An additional 15-foot building setback is required beyond the edge of the buffer. b. A maximum of 200 square feet of wetland will be filled for construction of SE 136"' Street. Mitigation shall consist of at least 400 square feet of wetland enhancement to 15 LOIPOOJ6/LOITY401-Eve. • degraded portions of the existing wetland. Road improvements for I 60'h Avenue SE and SE 136'h Street will eliminate an area of wetland buffer. Mitigation shall consist of providing al least an equivalent area of buffer added to the northeast portion of the site. c. Downstream drainage improvements to existing culverts and stormwater conveyances required through the SEPA MDNS shall cause no adverse alteration to existing wetlands or streams in the vicinity of the drainage improvements. d. Critical Areas staff shall review engineering plans for the plat for conformance with these requirements. 15. The following note shall be shown on the final engineering plan and recorded plat: RESTRICTIONS FOR SENSITIVE AREA TRACTS AND SENSITIVE AREAS AND BUFFERS Dedication of a sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. This interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the land subject to the tract/sensitive area and buffer the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by King County, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. The vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without approval in writing from the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services or its successor agency, unless otherwise provided by Jaw. The common boundary between the tract/sensitive area and buffer and the area of development activity must be marked or otherwise flagged to the satisfaction of King County prior to any clearing, grading, building construction or other development activity on a lot subject to the sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer. The required marking or flagging shall remain in place until all development proposal activities in the vicinity of the sensitive area are completed. No building foundations are allowed beyond the required 15-foot building setback line, unless otherwise provided by law. 16. Suitable recreation space shall be provided consistent with the requirements KCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21A.14.190 for providing sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic table[s], benches, etc. a. A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) shall be submitted for review and approval by DDES and King County Parks prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the engineering plans. This plan shall comply with Ordinance# 14045. b. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. 16 ... LOI POOi 6/LOITY 401-Evendell l) 17. A homeowners' association or olher workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction of DDES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation, open space and/or sensitive area tract(s). · 18. Street trees shall be included in the design of all road improvements, and shall comply with Section 5.03 of the KCRS and KCC 21A.16.050: a. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. b. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. c. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of- way line. d. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. e. The species of trees shall be approved by DOES if located within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft m.aplcs, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or stonn sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. . f. The applicant shall submit a street tree pla'n and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by ODES prior to engineering plan approval. g. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the perfonnance bond replaced with a ·maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DOES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. A landscape inspection fee shall also be submitted prior to plat recording. The inspection fee is subject to change based on current County fees. School Mitigation Fees 19. Lots within this subdivision are subject to King County Code 21A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and 17 .. .Gl'J> -- LOI POOJ 6/LOJ TY 40!-Even, Exhibit No. 14 Wetland evaluation and delineation report, wildlife habitat evaluation and compensatory wetland mitigation plan by Habitat Technologies, dated May 15, 2001 Exhibit No. 15 Addendum to wetland/stream/wildlife report dated October 28, 2002 Exhibit No. 16 City of Renton three-page certificate of sewer availability dated 6/15/01 Exhibit No. 17 Jaques, Fred & Helga email dated November I, 2001 Exhibit No. 18 Carlson, Marilynn letter dated November 7, 2001 Exhibit No. 19 Revised alternative R-4 plat density calculations received 3/26/02 Exhibit No. 20 Petition from Gwendolyn High (8 pg.+ cover), received September 23, 2002 Exhibit No. 21 City of Renton letter received January 22, 2003, with attachments (4 pgs.) Exhibit No. 22 Letter from G. High & M. Rollinger for Citizens Alliance for a Responsible Evendell (CARE) dated April 5, 2002 with attachments (60 pgs. + cover) Exhibit No. 23 G. High and M. Rollinger, CARE petition to intervene filed on 2/18/03 Exhibit No. 24 DOES planning map (created 7/1/2003) prepared 2/20/2003 showing new development planned in the immediate vicinity Exhibit No. 25 Letter from Greg Zimmerman, City of Renton, dated March 05, 2003 (2/12/03 memo attached) Exhibit No. 26 Certificate of Transportation Concurrency received July 6, 200 I Exhibit No. 27 Topographic map provided by City of Renton (aerial photography taken Winter, 1996) subject property in conjunction with Highland Estates Exhibit No. 28 Article from King County Journal, "Give Us Some Space, Firefighters Say ... " 02/27/2003 Exhibit No. 29 Exhibit No. 30 Exhibit No. 31 Exhibit No. 32 Exhibit No. 33 Exhibit No. 34 Transportation service areas 2000 map-KCDDES, February, 2001 Community action strategies sub-area priority ranking map -KCDOT, February, 2001 Assessors map of East Renton/Briarwood area with coloring Proposed but nor entered into rhe record -area map showing nesting sires Online permit details -ODES website printouts ( 18 pg) Notice of application for the Bales Annexation and pre-zone application, dated January 15, 2003 -City of Renton Exhibit No. 35 Letter from Scott D. Baker, Consulting Arborist dated 2/8103 Exhibit No. 36 Tree retention/protection buffer site plan alternatives Exhibit No. 37 C.A.R.E. households list (2 pg) Exhibit No. 38 Letter from Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council dated March 5, 2003 Exhibit No. 39 Tree loss and possible ground water contamination depiction Exhibit No. 40 Sign-in and time donation sheet (3 pg) dated March 6, 2003 Exhibit No. 41 Transportation concurrency diagrams for 2001, 2002 & 2003 Exhibit No. 42 a Letter (2 pg) from Don & Janice Milbrath dated March 3, 2003 Exhibit No. 43 b Letter (2 pg) from Kristy J. Hill dated March 6, 2003 c Letter (2 pg) from Edward and June Hill dated March 6, 2003 d Letter (I pg) from Charles W. Scoby, Viola M. Scoby, and Geneva D. e f g h J Scholes dated March I, 2003 Letter (I pg) from Laurie A. Hindes dated February 26. 2003 Letter (2 pg) from Mark Costello dated March 4, 2003 Letter (I pg) from Eloise and Claude Stchowiak dated March 6, 2003 Letter (3 pg) from Bruce and Joyce Osgoodby dated Feb. 21, 2003, and March, 6, 2003 Letter ( I pg) from Richard Savage (undated) Letter ( I pg) from Dan & Lynn Peterson, also signed by Fred & Helga Jaques (undated) Exhibit No. 44 a b Letter (I pg) from John Nanney dated March 6, 2003 Letter (I pg) from Linda Williams dated March 5, 2003 Letter (I pg) from Rodney S. Stewart dated March 5, 2003 C 22 LOI POOi 6/LOITY 401-Evendell • 19 TRANSMJ'ITED this 28th day of March, 2003, to the parties and interested persons of record: 4 Creeks UAC Scott 0. Baker Marshall Brenden Attn: Claudia Donnelly 7018 47th Ave. NE 18225 SE 128th P.O. Box 3501 Seattle WA 98115 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98056 Ronda Bryant Marilyn Carlson Ronald Coffin 15406 SE 136th Street 13616 -156th Avae. SE 16015 SE 135th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059-6828 Michael Rae Cooke Robert Darrow Shirtey Day 13125 158th Ave. SE Haozous Engineering 14412 • 167th Pl. SE Renton WA 98059 15428 -45th Court Renton WA 98059 Mukilteo WA 98275 Roger Dorstad Michelle Hagerman Stephen & Yvonne Hanson Evergreen East Realty 13710 156th Ave. SE 15611 SE 138th Pl. PO Box 375 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Redmond WA 98073 Mark Heckert Valerie Hemnes Victor & Gwendolyn High Habitat Technologies 15627 SE 139th Pl. 13405 -158th Ave. SE 606 E Main St. Renton WA 98059-7 422 Renton WA 98059 Puyallup WA 98371-1088 Edward & June Hill Edward & Nancy Hilton Kurt Hughes 13527 156th St. SE 13414 • 158th Ave. SE 19112 NE 146thWay Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Woodinville WA 98072-6361 Fred & Helga Jaques Leonard J. Johnston Diane Kazele 13114 · 158th Ave. SE 16016 SE 135th 15657 SE 137th Pt. Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Don Kezele Joann Lee Tim & Gina Lex 15657 SE 137th Pl. 13802 • 160th Ave. SE 13116 · 158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Rebecca Und Steve Lyman Jerry Marcy 1055 S. Grady Way 14505 • 160th Ave. SE P.O. Box 575 Renton WA 98058 Renton WA 98059 Seattle WA 98111 Heckert, Mark Fred & Gloria Martin Linda Matlock Habitat Technologies 13019 -160th Ave. SE WA State Ecol. Dept./WOSW Unit 606 E Maine St. Renton WA 98059 PO Box47696 Puyallup WA 98371-1088 Olympia WA 98504· 7696 Jim McDougal Bill Mokin Eleanor Moon 14502 167th Pl. SE 14404 -162nd Ave. SE KC Executive Horse Council Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 12230 NE 61st Kirkland WA 98033 Steven & Peri Muhich John Nanney Sally Nipert 13420-160th Ave. SE 16169 SE 146th Pl. 149<)4 -156th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Gary Norris Florence Nott Dave Nyblom Gary Struthers & Associates 15915 SE 134th Pl. 13606 • 158th Avenue SE 3150 Richards Road # 100 Renton WA 98059-6832 Renton WA 98059 Bellevue WA 98005 LOIPOOJ6/LOJTY401-Evem- Richard & Anita Oliphant 16519 SE 145th St. Renton WA 98059 David Platt 510 Panoramic Dr. Camano Island WA 98282 Mike Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 8th Drive SE Bothell WA 98021 Charles & Viola Scoby 13112 -158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059-8531 Howard Stansbury US Land Development Association 22617 -8th Dr. SE Bothell WA 98021 David Watler 15635 SE 138th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Kurt Wilson Harbour Homes 1010 South 336th Street #305 Federal Way WA 98003 Greg Borba DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 · Kristen Langley DDES/LUSD Land Use Traffic MS OAK-DE-0100 Larry West DDES/LUSD Geo Review MS OAK-DE-0100 Dave Petrie 811 S 273rd Court Des Moines WA 98198 David Aockabrand Four Creeks UAC 11427 162nd Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Geneva Scholes 12924 -158th Ave. SE Renlon WA 98059 Karen & Jeffrey Sidebotham 13004 -158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Peggy Streit 13512 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Alex Weitz 15646 SE 138th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Alvin Wotberg 16021 SE 136th St. Renton WA 98059 Laura Casey DDES/LUSD Wetland Review MS OAK-DE-0100 Carol Rogers LUSD/CPLN MS OAK-DE-0100 Bruce Whittaker DDES/LUSD Prel. Review Engineer MS OAK-DE-0100 • David Petrie 811 S. 273rd Ct. Des Moines WA 98198 Marsha Rollinger 15646 SE 138th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Curtis Schuster KBS Ill, LLC 12505 Bel-Red Rd., Ste. 212 Bellevue WA 98005 Daniel B. Slaton 15315 SE 133rd Court Renton WA 98059 Penny Thorbeck 15650 SE 138th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Mr. & Mrs. Bob Wilmot 13900 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Harold & Eleanor Zeek 16612 SE 145th St. Renton WA 98059 Kim Claussen DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 Karen Scharer DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL In order to appeal the decision of the Examiner, written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King County Council with a fee of $250.00 (check payable to King County Office of Finance) on or before April 11, 2003. If a notice of appeal is filed, the original and six (6) copies of a written appeal statement specifying the basis for the appeal and argument in support of the appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King County Council on or before April 18, 2003. Appeal statements may refer only to facts contained in the hearing record; new facts may not be presented on appeal. 20 LOI POOi 6/LOJTY 401-Evendell Filing requires actual delivery to the Office of the Clerk of the Council, Room 1025, King County Courthouse, 516 3'' Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104, prior to the close of business (4:30 p.m.) on the date due. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Clerk does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Office of the Clerk is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. MINUTES OF THE MARCH 6 AND 10, 2003 PUBLIC HEARING ON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FILE NO. LOIP0016AND LOITY401. James N. O'Connor was the Hearing Examiner in this matter. Participating in the hearing were Karen Scharer, Kristin Langley, Bruce Whittaker and Laura Casey, representing the Department; Mike Romano, representing the Applicant; Marsha Rollinger and Gwendolyn High, representing the Jntervenors; and Mark Heckert, Gary Norris, Scott Baker, Michael Rae Cooke, David Rockabrand, Dave Petry, Michelle Hagerman, Sally Nipert, Diane Kazele, Alex Weitz, Fred Jaques, Jim McDougal, John Nanney, Bill Mokin, Anita Oliphant, Vanessa Burris, June Hill, Rhonda Bryant, and Kristy Hill. The following exhibits were offered and entered into the record: Exhibit No. I DDES combined file LOITY401 & LOI POOi 6, application filed and dated July 6, 2001 Exhibit No. 2A DDES application for land use permit(s) LOITY401 & LOI POOi 6, application dated July 6, 200 I 2B Zone reclassification application and justification questionnaire with revision received September 6, 2001 Exhibit No. 3A DDES preliminary report prepared 02/20/03 with attachments as follow: I. Map of rezone from R-4 to R-6 2. Reduced copy of R-6 -70 lot preliminary plat 3. Reduced copy of R-4 -alternative 46 lot plat 4. Density calculations for R-6 plat 5. City of Renton January 20, 2003, letter 6. City of Renton June 15, 2001 letter 7. Certificate of water availability dated May 30, 2001 8. School information dated July 12, 2001 9. · SWM adjustment approval forL02V0024 dated October 17, 2002 3B DDES addendum report with corrections and additional information regarding schools serving the property, prepared 02/27/03 Exhibit No. 4 Revised environmental checklist received October 14, 2002 Exhibit No. 5 Mitigated determination of non-significance dated December 23, 2002 Exhibit No. 6 Affidavit of posting indicating posting dates of October 3 and 4, 2001. Exhibit No. 7A Site plan (70 lot preliminary plat map) received March 26, 2002 7B Alternative site plan (46 lot preliminary plat map) received March 26, 2002 Exhibit No. 8 Assessors maps (4) for SE 14-23-05 revised 02/23/95, NE 14-23-05 revised 04/05/93, NW 14-23-05 revised 10/92, and SW 14-23-05 revised 07/07/97 Exhibit No. 9 Traffic impact analysis by Garry Struthers Associates, Inc. dated June 28, 2001 Exhibit No. JO Traffic memo dated January 29, 2002, from Garry Struthers Assoc., Inc. Exhibit No. 11 Preliminary technical information report dated June, 2001, by Haozous Eng., P.S. Exhibit No. 12 Level 3 downstream drainage analysis by Haozous Eng., P.S., dated August 26, 2002 Exhibit No. 13 Addendum (6 pages plus cover) to the level-three study dated December 5, 2002 21 LOI POOi 6/LOITY 401-Even"' • Exhibit No. 14 Wetland evaluation and delineation report, wildlife habitat evaluation and compensatory wetland mitigation plan by Habitat Technologies, dated May 15, 2001 Exhibit No. 15 Addendum to wetlancl/stream/wildlife report dated October 28, 2002 Exhibit No. 16 City of Renton three-page certificate of sewer availability dated 6/15/01 Exhibit No. 17 Jaques, Fred & Helga email dated November I, 2001 Exhibit No. 18 Carlson, Marilynn letter dated November 7, 2001 Exhibit No. 19 Revised alternative R-4 plat density calculations received 3/26/02 Exhibit No. 20 Petition from Gwendolyn High (8 pg. + cover), received September 23, 2002 Exhibit No. 21 City of Renton lelter received January 22, 2003, with altachments (4 pgs.) Exhibit No. 22 Letter from G. High & M. Rollinger for Citizens Alliance for a Responsible Evendell (CARE) dated April 5, 2002 with attachments (60 pgs. + cover) Exhibit No. 23 G. High and M. Rollinger, CARE petition to intervene filed on 2/18/03 Exhibit No. 24 ODES planning map (created 7/1/2003) prepared 2/20/2003 showing new development planned in the immediate vicinity Exhibit No. 25 Letter from Greg Zimmerman, City of Renton, dated March 05, 2003 (2/12/03 memo attached) Exhibit No. 26 Certificate of Transportation Concurrency received July 6, 2001 Exhibit No. 27 Topographic map provided by City of Renton (aerial photography taken Winter, 1996) subject property in conjunction with Highland Estates Exhibit No. 28 Article from King County Journal, "Give Us Some Space, Firefighters Say ... " 02/27/2003 Exhibit No. 29 Exhibit No. 30 Exhibit No. 31 Exhibit No. 32 Exhibit No. 33 Exhibit No. 34 Exhibit No. 35 Exhibit No. 36 Exhibit No. 37 Exhibit No. 38 Exhibit No. 39 Exhibit No. 40 Exhibit No. 41 Exhibit No. 42 Exhibit No. 43 Transportation service areas 2000 map-KCDDES, February, 2001 Community action strategies sub-area priority ranking map-KCDOT, February, 2001 Assessors map of East Renton/Briarwood area with coloring Proposed but not entered into the record -area map showing nesting sites Online permit details -ODES website printouts ( 18 pg) Notice o_f application for the Bales Annexation and pre-zone application, dated January 15, 2003 -City of Renton Letter from Scott D. Baker, Consulting Arborist dated 2/8/03 Tree retention/protection buffer site plan alternatives C.A.R.E. households list (2 pg) Leiter from Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council dated March 5, 2003 Tree loss and possible ground waler contamination depiction Sign-in and time donation sheet (3 pg) dated March 6, 2003 Transportation concurrency diagrams for 200 I, 2002 & 2003 a Letter (2 pg) from Don & Janice Milbrath dated March 3, 2003 b Leiter (2 pg) from Kristy J. Hill dated March 6, 2003 c Letter (2 pg) from Edward and June Hill dated March 6, 2003 d Letter (I pg) from Charles W. Scoby, Viola M. Scoby, and Geneva D. e f g h j Scholes dated March I, 2003 Leiter ( I pg) from Laurie A. Hindes dated February 26, 2003 Letter (2 pg) from Mark Costello dated March 4, 2003 Letter (I pg) from Eloise and Claude Stchowiak dated March 6, 2003 Letter (3 pg) from Bruce and Joyce Osgoodby dated Feb. 21, 2003, and March, 6, 2003 Letter ( I pg) from Richard Savage (undated) Letter ( I pg) from Dan & Lynn Peterson, also signed by Fred & Helga Jaques (undated) Exhibit No. 44 a b Letter ( I pg) from John Nanney dated March 6, 2003 Letter ( I pg) from Linda Williams dated March 5, 2003 Leiter ( I pg) from Rodney S. Stewart dated March 5, 2003 C 22 . LOIP0016/LOITY40I-Evendell d e f. Exhibit No. 45 a b C d e Letter (l pg) from Edward A. Schultz dated March 4, 2003 Letter ( I pg) from Joseph Matsudaira dated March 5, 2003 Letter ( I pg) from Brenda Matsudaira dated March 5, 2003 Letter ( I pg) from Richard & Anita Oliphant dated March 5, 2003 Letter (2 pg) from Mark Costello dated March 4, 2003 Letter (2 pg) from Jeff & Karen Sidebotham (undated) Letter ( l pg) signed by Nancy & Edward Hilton dated March 6, 2003 Memo ( 4 pg) from Michael Rae Cooke dated March 4, 2003, with attached resident survey sheet, error notes, and April 3, 2002, memo and attachments (8 pg) to King County Surface Water and Land Management The following items were entered at the March l 0, 2003, continued hearing: Exhibit No. 46 Exhibit No. 47 Exhibit No. 48 Exhibit No. 49 Exhibit No. 50 Exhibit No. 51 Exhibit No. 52 Exhibit No. 53 Exhibit No. 54 Exhibit No. 55 Exhibit No. 56 Exhibit No. 57 Exhibit No. 58 JNO:gao/cp a b C d e f g h LOIPOOI6 L01TY401 RPT Photos (9) provided by Anita Oliphant with commentary (undated) Letter (3 pg) from Bruce and Joyce Osgoody dated February 2 I, 2003 Letter ( I pg) from Marilynn Carlson dated March 9, 2003 Letter (2 pg) from Kristy Hill dated March 6, 2003 Letter ( I pg) from Marsha Rollinger (undated) Letter ( I pg) from Joseph Bostjancic dated March 5, 2003 Memo ( I pg) from Nick Gillen dated March 7, 2003 Copy of table #3 from the 2002 Issaquah school plan showing "Projected Capacity to House Sudents" Memo ( 1 · pg) from Mark Heckert, Habitat Technologies, dated March 10, 2003 Gwendolyn High's testimony of March 6, 2003 with cover letter dated March l 0, 2003 noting correction Letters from: Donald & Diane Kezelle (2 pg) -undated Vanessa Burris ( 1 pg) Carolyn Ann Buckett ( l pg) Ronda Bryant (3 pg) dated March l 0, 2003 Michael Rae Cooke (7 pg) dated 3/8/02 Marsha Rollinger ( I pg) undated Sally Ni pert ( I pg) dated March 6, 2003 Shirley Day (I pg) dated March 6, 2003 Bill and Donna Mok.in (2 pg) dated March 6, 2003 Photos of hawk (2) DOES revised recommendation/additional conditions dated 3/10/03 23 ,· (' i \ ... .1' OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 850 Union.Bank of California Building 900 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98164 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 February 19, 2003 PRE-HEARING ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. LOIP0016 & LOITY401 Location: Applicant: Intervenors: EVENDELL SUBDIVISION AND REZONE Rezone and Preliminary Plat Applications South of SE 136th between 1561h Ave. SE and 1601h Ave. SE US Land Development Association/Centurion, represented by Mike Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 -8th Drive Southeast Bothell, WA 98021 Telephone: (425) 486-2563 Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Evendell, represented by Gwendolyn High 13405 -158th Avenue Southeast Renton, WA 98059 and Marsha Rollinger 15646 Southeast 1381h Place Renton, WA 98059 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services Land use Services Division, represented by Karen Scharer 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Telephone: (206) 296-7114 Facsimile: (206) 296-7055 I. A pre-hearing conference on the above-referenced applications was held by the King County Hearing Examiner's Office on February 18, 2003. In attendance were Michael Romano representing the Applicant, Karen Scharer representing King County ODES, and Gwendolyn High and Marsha Rollinger representing neighborhood residents. LOIP0016 & LOITY401-Eve-2 2. An intervention petition was received from Ms. High and Ms. Rollinger as representatives of a neighborhood group, the Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Evendell. Intervention was granted based on the public interest in facilitating an organized presentation of neighborhood testimony. Ms. High and Ms. Rollinger will also be provided an opportunity to cross-examine other parties' witnesses. 3. The following deadlines have been established for the pre-hearing procedures described below: o February 20, 2003. Deadline for filing the DOES staff report. o February 27, 2003. Deadline for disclosing to the other parties and to the Hearing Examiner, the name, address, telephone number and qualifications of each expert witness who is expected to testify at the hearing. A brief summary of the testimony expected to be provided by any such witness shall also be supplied. 4. The public hearing on the applications is scheduled to open at the following time and place: 9:30 a.m. -March 6, 2003 Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 5. The representatives of the parties for the purposes of service and exchange of documents and information are those identified in bold face at the beginning of this pre-hearing order. 6. While oversized displays may be used at the public hearing for demonstrative purposes, smaller copies thereof sized to fit within an 8 Y, by 14 Y,-inch file should be submitted to the hearing record as exhibits. Also please note that pre-hearing exchange of documents among the patties does not eliminate the need to offer separate copies of such documents at the hearing as exhibits. 7. The parties are directed to bring to the public hearing three copies of any exhibits that have not been previously disclosed, one copy to be submitted to the hearing record and two copies for other parties. ORDERED this 19th day of February, 2003. mt King County Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED this 19th day of February, 2003, to the following parties and interested persons: 4 Creeks UAC Attn: Claudia Donnelly P.O. Box 3501 Renton WA 98056 Ronald Coffin 16015 SE 135th Pl. Renton WA 98059-6828 Ronda Bryant 15406 SE 136th Street Renton WA 98059 Robert Darrow Haozous Engineering 15428 -45th Court Mukilteo WA 98275 Marilyn Carlson 13616-156th Avae. SE Renton WA 98059 Shirley Day 14412-167th Pl. SE Renton WA 98059 ·, J UHPOOl6 & LOITY401-Evendell 3 Roger Dorstad Stephen & Yvonne Hanson Valerie Hemnes Evergreen East Realty 15611 SE 138th Pl. 15627 SE 139th Pl. PO Box 375 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059-7422 Redmond WA 98073 Victor & Gwendolyn High Edward & June Hill Edward & Nancy Hilton 13405 -158th Ave. SE 13527 156th St. SE 13414-158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Kurt Hughes Fred & Helga Jaques Leonard J. Johnston 19112 NE 146thWay 13114-158thAve. SE 16016 SE 135th Woodinville WA 98072-6361 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Don Kezele Joann Lee Tim & Gina Lex 15657 SE 137th Pl. 13802 -160th Ave. SE 13116-158thAve. SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Rebecca Lind Steve Lyman Jerry Marcy 1055 S. Grady Way 14505-160th Ave. SE P.O. Box 575 Renton WA 98058 Renton WA 98059 Seattle WA 98111 Fred & Gloria Martin Linda Matlock Bill Mokin 13019 -160th Ave. SE WA State Ecol. Dept.lWQSW Unit 14404-162nd Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 PO Box 47696 Renton WA 98059 Olympia WA 98504-7696 Eleanor Moon Steven & Peri Muhich Sally Nipert KC Executive Horse Council 13420 -160th Ave. SE 14004-156th Ave. SE 12230 NE 61st Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Kirkland WA 98033 Florence Nott Dave Nyblom Richard & Anita Oliphant 15915 SE 134th Pl. 13606 -158th Avenue SE 16519 SE 145th St. Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 David Petrie David Platt Marsha Rollinger 811 S. 273rd Ct. 510 Panoramic Dr. 15646 SE 138th Pl. Des Moines WA 98198 Camano Island WA 98282 Renton WA 98059 Mike Romano Geneva Scholes Curtis Schuster Centurion Development Services 12924 -158th Ave. SE KBS 111, LLC 22617 8th Drive SE Renton WA 98059 12505 Bel-Red Rd., Ste. 212 Bothell WA 98021 Bellevue WA 98005 Charles & Viola Scoby Karen & Jeffrey Sidebotham Daniel 8. Slaton 13112-158thAve.SE 13004-158th Ave. SE 15315 SE 133rd Court Renton WA 98059-8531 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Howard Stansbury Peggy Streit Penny Thorbeck US Land Development Association 13512-160thAve. SE 15650 SE 138th Pl. 22617 -8th Dr. SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Bothell WA 98021 David Watler Mr. & Mrs. Bob Wilmot Kurt Wilson 15635 SE 138th Pl. 13900 -160th Ave. SE Harbour Homes Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 1010 South 336th Street #305 Federal Way WA 98003 LOIPOOl6 & LOITY401-Evce Alvin Walberg 16021 SE 136th St. Renton WA 98059 Laura Casey DDES/LUSD Site Development Services MS OAK-DE-0100 Carol Rogers LUSD/CPLN MS OAK-DE-0100 Bruce Whittaker LUSD/ERS Prel. Review Engineer MS OAK-DE-0100 Harold & Eleanor Zeek 16612 SE 145th St. Renton WA 98059 Kim Claussen DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 Karen Scharer DDESILUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 (ill\ • Greg Borba DDESILUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 Kristen Langley Land Use Traffic/DOES MS OAK-DE-0100 Larry West LUSDISDSS Wetland Review MS OAK-DE-0100 4 NOTE: If the Renton School District announces a district-wide school closure due to adverse weather conditions or similar area emergency, the public hearing on this matter will be postponed. Parties of record will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any questions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. Sign language and communication material in alternate formats can be arranged given sufficient notice at 296-1000 (TDD number 296-1024). SLS:gao LOIPOOl6 PHO Attachment ., . AITACHMENT A (Excerpt from Examiner's Rules, effective March 31, 1995) XI.B CONDUCT OF HEARING: Presentation of Evidence ... 2. Admissibility of Evidence a. Except as otherwise provided by these rules, evidence will not be limited by the Washington Rules of Evidence (ER). Any trustworthy oral or documentary evidence may be received, including reliable hearsay. However, the examiner shall exclude testimony or evidence which is unreliable, unduly repetitive, irrelevant, immaterial or privileged, and may use ER as a guide when making evidentiary rulings. b. Opinions of lay witnesses on matters normally within the purview of qualified experts ordinarily will not be excluded, but lack of qualification shall be considered when giving weight to such opinions. c. The examiner may admit excerpts from public documents or from books, studies or reports when the remainder of such material is either irrelevant or unnecessary for an adequate understanding of the issue. d. Copies of documents may be accepted as evidence, provided, that the examiner may exclude copies when there is reasonable doubt as to authenticity. e. In proceedings where a penalty, forfeiture or similar divestiture oflegally cognizable rights is sought by King County, the examiner may apply the Washington Rules of Evidence to govern the admissibility of evidence, and may require adherence to other rules applied in the Superior Court for King County to assure that due process oflaw is afforded to the parties. 3. Exhibits a. Copies of documents submitted as exhibits must be legible. b. A rare or one-of-a-kind exhibit which is held by a King County agency, and which cannot be conveniently reproduced, may be entered in the hearing record by reference. Examples of such exhibits include, but are not limited to, official zoning, land use or community plan maps or aerial photographs. If practical, duplicate reduced copies should be provided as an exhibit when possible to do so without excessive cost. c. Physical evidence may be excluded by the examiner, even though relevant, on the basis of an unreasonable custodial burden if other relevant evidence having equivalent probative value is available. The examiner also may require the substitution of photographs or reduced size copies for exhibits which are difficult to store, and written or oral descriptions of water, rocks, dirt, or other objects, instead of the actual items. Photographs, maps, charts, illustrations or similar materials which are mounted for presentation purposes shall be removable from their mounting and capable of being stored within a legal size filing cabinet drawer, unless reasonable need for submission of an exhibit not susceptible to reduction is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the examiner. (For charts, photo montages, and similar materials, a common method to meet the requirements of this rule is to attach the item(s) presented to a plain paper backing prior to mounting on poster-board, so that the evidence can be readily removed from the poster board for storage.) d. Exhibits accepted into the record shall not normally be returned to parties, except that the responsible county agency may act as the official custodian of the case file. The examiner may order the return of an exhibit when there is no public or private need for retention by the examiner or responsible County agency. DIREi\lONS TO DDES HEARING R~M 90~AKESDALE AVE SW, RENTuN SOUTHBOUND 1-5 • EXIT 157 -Marting Luther King Way • Tum RIGHT onto 68"' Ave. S. 68'h Ave. S. becomes MONSTER RD. SW Monster Rd. turns into OAKESDALE A VE SW DOES is on your left (building 900) NORTHBOUND 1-5 • EXIT 154 to 1-405/W A-518/Burien/Renton • Stay right to 1-405/Renton/Bellevue • 1-405 EXIT I to WA-181/W. Valley Hwy. LEFT onto W. Valley Hwy/SR 181 • RIGHT onto East Grady Way • LEFT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW ODES is on your right (building 900) NORTHBOUND SR 167 • Northbound under the l-405 overpass • LEFT at SW 7"' St. (2"a light) • LEFT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW ODES is on your left (building 900) SOUTHBOUND 1-405 • EXIT 2 to WA-167/Aubum/Rainier Ave. • Follow to SR-167 (Valley Fwy.) north • LEFT onto SW Grady Way • RIGHT onto Oakesdale Ave._SW DDES is on your right (building 900) NORTHBOUND 1-405 • EXIT I to Interurban Ave. S/W est Valley Hwy • LEFT at light at ramp bottom (north under 1-405) • RIGHT onto SW Grady Way • LEFT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW DDES is on your right (building 900) SW 7TI1 STREET SW GRADY WAY. N s G:\working\Misc\Hex\DDES directions.doc ,.,·•lo, ''-( .. • OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 850 Union Bank of California Building 900 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98164 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 February 6, 2003 NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED PRE-HEARING CONFERENCE SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. L01P0016 & L01TY401 EVENDELL SUBDMSION AND REZONE Rezone and Preliminary Plat Applications Location: South of SE 136thbetween 1561h Ave. SE and 160 1h Ave. SE Applicant: US Land Development Association/Centurion Attn: Howard Stansbury 22617 -8th Drive Southeast Bothell, WA 98021 Telephone: ( 425) 486-2563 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services Land use Services Division, represented by Karen Scharer 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Telephone: (206) 296-7114 Facsimile: (206) 296-7055 At the request of the neighborhood resident representative, the pre-hearing conference scheduled for Tuesday, February 11, 2003, has been rescheduled for 11 :30 a.m. on February 18, 2003, in the Department of Development and Environmental Services Hearing Room, 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest, Renton, Washington. ORDERED this 6'h day of February, 2003. -• LO I POO I 6/LO I TY 401-Evendell TRANSMITTED this 6th day ofFebmary, 2003, to the following parties and interested persons: 4 Creeks UAC Attn: Claudia Donnelly P.O. Box 3501 Renton WA 98056 Ronald Coffin 16015 SE 135th Pl. Renton WA 98059-6828 Stephen & Yvonne Hanson 15611 SE 138th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Edward & June Hill 13527 156th St. SE Renton WA 98059 Fred & Helga Jaques 13114-158thAve. SE Renton WA 98059 Joann Lee 13802 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Steve Lyman 14505 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Linda Matlock WA State Ecol. Dept./WOSW Unit PO Box47696 Olympia WA 98504-7696 Steven & Peri Muhich 13420 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Richard & Anita Oliphant 16519 SE 145th St. Renton WA 98059 Marsha Rollinger 15646 SE 138th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Curtis Schuster KBS Ill, LLC 12505 Bel-Red Rd., Ste. 212 Bellevue WA 98005 Ronda Bryant 15406 SE 136th Street Renton WA 98059 Shirley Day 14412 -167th Pl. SE Renton WA 98059 Valerie Hemnes 15627 SE 139th Pl. Renton WA 98059-7422 Edward & Nancy Hilton 13414 -158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Leonard J. Johnston 16016 SE 135th Renton WA 98059 Tim & Gina Lex 13116-158thAve.SE Renton WA 98059 Jerry Marcy P.O. Box 575 Seattle WA 98111 Bill Makin 14404 -162nd Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Sally Nipert 14004 -156th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 David Petrie 811 S. 273rd Ct. Des Moines WA 98198 Mike Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 8th Drive SE Bothell WA 98021 Charles & Viola Scoby 13112 -158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059-8531 Marilyn Carlson 13616 -156th Avae. SE Renton WA 98059 Roger Oorstad Evergreen East Realty PO Box375 Redmond WA 98073 Victor & Gwendolyn High 13405 -158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Kurt Hughes 15646 SE 138th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Don Kezele 15657 SE 137th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Rebecca Lind 1055 S. Grady Way Renton WA 98058 Fred & Gloria Martin 13019-160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Eleanor Moon KC Executive Horse Council 12230 NE 61st Kirkland WA 98033 Florence Nott 15915 SE 134th Pl. Renton WA 98059 David Platt 510 Panoramic Dr. Camano Island WA 98282 Geneva Scholes 12924-158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Karen & Jeffrey Sidebotham 13004 -158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 2 LO I POO 16/LO I TY 401-Evendell Daniel 8. Slaton 15315 SE 133rd Court Renton WA 98059 Penny Thorbeck 15650 SE 138th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Kurt Wilson Harbour Homes 1010 South 336th Street #305 Federal Way WA 98003 Greg Borba DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 Kristen Langley Land Use Traffic/DDES/CPLN MS OAK-DE-0100 Larry West LUSD/SDSS Wetland Review MS OAK-DE-0100 • Howard Stansbury US Land Development Association 22617 -8th Dr. SE Bothell WA 98021 David Watler 15635 SE 138th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Alvin Walberg 16021 SE 136th St. Renton WA 98059 Kim Claussen DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 Carol Rogers LUSDICPLN MS OAK-DE-0100 Bruce Whittaker LUSD/ERS Pre!. Review Engineer MS OAK-DE-0100 Peggy Streit 13512-16oth Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Mr. & Mrs. Bob Wilmot 13900 -16oth Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Harold & Eleanor Zeek 16612 SE 145th St. Renton WA 98059 Nick Gillen Wetland Review DDESISDSS MS OAK-DE-0100 Karen Scharer DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 3 NOTE: If the Renton School District announces a district-wide school closure due to adverse weather conditions or similar area emergency, the public hearing on this matter will be postponed. Parties of record will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any questions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. Sign language and communication material in alternate fonnats can be arranged given sufficient notice (296-4660). SLS:ms L01POOI6 PHC2 Attachment TDD Number 296-!024. llf9il aaaaa aaaa 0.2:,,:..• LO I POO 16/LO I TY 401-Evendell 4 RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE KING COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER Rule VIII. PRE-HEARING CONFERENCES A. Purpose and Initiation Pre-hearing conferences promote efficient case management by providing an informal process for early identification of issues and resolution of procedural matters in complex cases. Evidence generally will not be received at a pre-hearing conference, except when required in order for the examiner to rule on a motion. (Pre-marking and introduction of exhibits to which there is no objection may occur at the discretion of the examiner.) The examiner, on motion of any party or upon his/her own motion, may convene a pre-hearing conference to: 1. Identify, clarify, limit or simplify issues. 2. Hear and consider pre-hearing motions. 3. Schedule hearings, identify parties and witnesses, determine the order of and limits upon testimony, obtain stipulations as to facts and law, identify and admit exhibits, order discovery, and consider and act upon any other matter which may aid in the efficient disposition of the hearing. B. Requests for Conference A motion to convene a pre-hearing conference shall be made to the examiner as soon as the need for a conference is recognized by the moving party (at least 21 days prior to the scheduled hearing date), and shall state the reasons for the request, including any motions to be presented. For good cause stated in the motion, the examiner may consider a request that fails to meet the 21-day requirement. For hearings authorized under KCC 20.24.080, a motion by any party for a pre-hearing conference shall be granted if timely. However, unless consented to by all parties or otherwise ordered for good cause by the examiner, no pre-hearing conference on an appeal can be convened later than 45 days after receipt of the statement of appeal by the hearing examiner's office. C. Proceedings at Conference A party who has received timely notice of a pre-hearing conference shall identify at the conference any pre-hearing motions not previously made which he/she intends to make. Parties or interested persons may also file timely written pre-hearing motions for consideration at the pre-hearing conference. Failure to make or disclose a motion which was available to the party at the time of the conference may be grounds for its denial if subsequently made. D. Pre-hearing Order Following a pre-hearing conference, the examiner shall issue an order specifying all items determined at the conference. The order shall be binding upon all parties and interested persons who received timely notice of the conference. Revised March 31, 1995 A) NORTIIBOUND 1-5 OR SOUTIIBOUND 1-5 -Take Renton exit to North 1-405 (eastbound) -Take Exit 1 ;Jnterurban Ave S/West Valley Hwy -Left tum at light at the bottom of ramp (north under 1-405) -Tum right (east) ai SW Grady Way -Tum left (north) at Oakesdale Ave SW -DOES is on the right (east) prior to SW 7th St \ C) NORTIIBOUND 1405 -Take Exit 1, Interurban Ave S/West Valley Hwy -Left tum at fight at the bottom of ramp (north under 1-405 -Tum right (east) at SW Grady Wy -Tum left (north) at Oakesdale Ave SW -ODES is on the right (east) prior to SW 7th St B) SOUTIIBOUND 1-405 -Take Exit 2, North 167 Renton -Al Second Slop Light tum lelt (wesl) al SW 7th Street -Continue to Oakesdale Ave. S.W. tum left (south) -ODES is on the left side L.-1 ' ' l D) NORTIIBOUND 167 -Go northbound under ihe 1-405 overpass -At second stop light tum left (west) at SW 7th St -Continue to Oakesdale Ave. SW, tum left (south) -ODES is on the left side OVE~ -· -···- l>epadmeol oftllpm~nl and Envi.-oumeiJt.al Services 900 Oakesdale Ave.oue SW Reolon SW 7th Sheet Ti --. i I I ':, l Bl.9G1 :o • •. , ! ' i;:111_;~;;;;1 111 11,,,;.,,, -. _D:t;!;!II t:!:!H 935 Powell A venue SW To SW Gndy Way To SW Cndy W2y ' LI OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 850 Union Bank of California Building 900 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98164 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 February 4, 2003 NOTICE OF PRE-HEARING CONFERENCE SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. L01P0016 & L01TY401 EVENDELL SUBDIVISION AND REZONE Rezone and Preliminary Plat Applications Location: South of SE 1361h between 1561h Ave. SE and 160'h Ave. SE Applicant: US Land Development Association/Centurion Attn: Howard Stansbury 22617 -8"' Drive Southeast Bothell, WA 98021 Telephone: ( 425) 486-2563 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services Land use Services Division, represented by Karen Scharer 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Telephone: (206) 296-7114 Facsimile: (206) 296-7055 As requested by neighborhood residents, on Tuesday, February 11, 2003 at 9:30 a.m., in the Department of Development and Environmental Services Hearing Room, 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest, Renton, Washington, a pre-hearing conference on this appeal will be opened for the purposes of: o Considering petitions for intervention; o Identifying issues; and o Addressing such other procedural matters as will assist in the efficient conduct of the hearing. Petitions for intervention shall be presented at the pre-hearing conference and shall conform to the requirements of Section X.A of the Hearing Examiner's Rules of Procedure. The public hearing on the above-referenced applications has been scheduled on this proposal for 9:30 a.m. on Thursday, March 6, 2003, at the DDES Hearing Room. • . --. . \ LO I POO 16/LO I TY 401-E vendell 4 RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE KTNG COUNTY HEARTNG EXAMTNER Rule VIII. PRE-HEARING CONFERENCES A. Purpose and Initiation Pre-hearing conferences promote efficient case management by providing an informal process for early identification of issues and resolution of procedural matters in complex cases. Evidence generally will not be received at a pre-hearing conference, except when required in order for the examiner to rule on a motion. (Pre-marking and introduction of exhibits to which there is no objection may occur at the discretion of the examiner.) The examiner, on motion of any party or upon his/her own motion, may convene a pre-hearing conference to: I. Identify, clarify, limit or simplify issues. 2. Hear and consider pre.hearing motions. 3. Schedule hearings, identify parties and witnesses, determine the order of and limits upon testimony, obtain stipulations as to facts and law, identify and admit exhibits, order discovery, and consider and act upon any other matter which may aid in the efficient disposition of the hearing. B. Requests for Conference A motion to convene a pre-hearing conference shall be made to the examiner as soon as the need for a conference is recognized by the moving party (at least 21 days prior to the scheduled hearing date), and shall state the reasons for the request, including any motions to be presented. For good cause stated in the motion, the examiner may consider a request that fails to meet the 21-day requirement. For hearings authorized under KCC 20.24.080, a motion by any party for a pre-hearing conference shall be granted if timely. However, unless consented to by all parties or otherwise ordered for good cause by the examiner, no pre-hearing conference on an appeal can be convened later tl1an 45 days after receipt of the statement of appeal by the hearing examiner's office. C. Proceedings at Conference A party who has received timely notice ofa pre-hearing conference shall identify at the conference any pre-hearing motions not previously made which he/she intends to make. Parties or interested persons may also file timely written pre-hearing motions for consideration at the pre-hearing conference. Failure to make or disclose a motion which was available to the party at the time of the conference may be grounds for its denial if subsequently made. D. Pre-hearing Order Following a pre-hearing conference, the examiner shall issue an order specifying all items determined at the conference. The order shall be binding upon all parties and interested persons who received timely notice of the conference. Revised March 31, 1995 . .-•.• LOI P0016/LOI TY401-Evendell Marsha Rollinger 15646 SE 138th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Curtis Schuster KBS Ill, LLC 12505 Bel-Red Rd., Ste. 212 Bellevue WA 98005 Daniel B. Slaton 15315 SE 133rd Court Renton WA 98059 Penny Thorbeck 15650 SE 138th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Kurt Wilson Harbour Homes 1010 South 336th Street #305 Federal Way WA 98003 Greg Borba DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 Kristen Langley Land Use Traffic/DDES/CPLN MS OAK-DE-0100 Larry West LUSD/SDSS Wetland Review MS OAK-DE-0100 - Mike Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 8th Drive SE Bothell WA 98021 Charles & Viola Scoby 13112-158thAve.SE Renton WA 98059-8531 Howard Stansbury US Land Development Association 22617 -8th Dr. SE Bothell WA 98021 David Watler 15635 SE 138th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Alvin Walberg 16021 SE 136th St. Renton WA 98059 Kim Claussen DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 Carol Rogers LUSD/CPLN MS OAK-DE-0100 Bruce Whittaker LUSD/ERS Prel. Review Engineer MS OAK-DE-0100 .. Geneva Scholes 12924-158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Karen & Jeffrey Sidebotham 13004 -158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Peggy Streit 13512-160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Mr. & Mrs. Bob Wilmot 13900 -16oth Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Harold & Eleanor Zeek 16612 SE 145th St. Renton WA 98059 Nick Gillen Wetland Review DDES/SDSS MS OAK-DE-0100 Karen Scharer DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 3 NOTE: If the Renton School District annonnces a district-wide school closnre due to adverse weather conditions or similar area emergency, the pnblic hearing on this matter will be postponed. Parties of record will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any qnestions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. Sign language and communication material in alternate formats can be arranged given sufficient notice (296-4660). SLS:gao L01P0016 PHC Attachment TDD Number 296-1024. .. ~~.... . LO IPOOl 6/LO I TY401-Evendell 4 RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE KING COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER Rule VIII. PRE-HEARING CONFERENCES A. Purpose and Initiation Pre-hearing conferences promote efficient case management by providing an informal process for early identification of issues and resolution of procedural matters in complex cases. Evidence generally will not be received at a pre-hearing conference, except when required in order for the examiner to rule on a motion. (Pre-marking and introduction of exhibits to which there is no objection may occur at the discretion of the examiner.) The examiner, on motion of any party or upon his/her own motion, may convene a pre-hearing conference to: I. Identify, clarify, limit or simplify issues. 2. Hear and consider pre-hearing motions. 3. Schedule hearings, identify parties and witnesses, determine the order of and limits upon testimony, obtain stipulations as to facts and law, identify and admit exhibits, order discovery, and consider and act upon any other matter which may aid in the efficient disposition of the hearing. B. Requests for Conference A motion to convene a pre•hearing conference shall be made to the examiner as soon as the need for a conference is recognized by the moving party (at least 21 days prior to the scheduled hearing date), and shall state the reasons for the request, including any motions to be presented. For good cause stated in the motion, the examiner may consider a request that fails to meet the 21-day requirement. For hearings authorized under KCC 20.24.080, a motion by any party for a pre-hearing conference shall be granted if timely. However, unless consented to by all parties or otherwise ordered for good cause by the examiner, no pre-hearing conference on an appeal can be convened later than 45 days after receipt of the statement of appeal by the hearing examiner's office. C. Proceedings at Conference A party who has received timely notice of a pre-hearing conference shall identify at the conference any pre-hearing motions not previously made which he/she intends to make. Parties or interested persons may also file timely written pre-hearing motions for consideration at the pre-hearing conference. Failure to make or disclose a motion which was available to the party at the time of the conference may be grounds for its denial if subsequently made. D. Pre-hearing Order Following a pre-hearing conference, the examiner shall issue an order specifying all items detennined at the conference. The order shall be binding upon all parties and interested persons who received timely notice of the conference. Revised March 31, 1995 .. A) NORTHBOUND 1-5 OR SOUTHBOUND 1-5 -Take Renton exit lo North 1-405 ( eastbound) -Take Exit 1,.lnterurban Ave SN/est Valley Hwy -Left tum at fight al the bottom of ramp ( north under 1-405) -Tum right (east) ai SW Grady Way -Tum left (north) at Oakesdale Ave SW -ODES is on the right (east) prior lo SW 7th St C) NORTHBOUND 1-405 -Take Exit 1, Interurban Ave SN/est Valley Hwy -Left tum at fight at the bottom of ramp (north under · 1-405 -Tum right (east) at SW Grady Wy -Tum left (north) at Oakesdale Ave SW -DOES is on the right (east) prior to SW 7th St B) SOUTHBOUND 1-405 -Take Exit 2, North 167 Renton -Al Second Slop Light turn left ( west) al SW 7th Street -Continue lo Oakesdale Ave. S.W. tum left (south) -ODES is on the left side D) NORTHBOUND 167 -Go northbound under ihe 1-405 overpass -Al second slop light tum left (west) at SW 71h St -Continue lo Oakesdale Ave. SW, tum left (south) -DOES is on the left side OVER Dep:1.-hneol orl-,m~nl and JEavi.-oomeol:lll Senicts 900 0.aktsd.ale An:uue SW lRentoo SW 7th Street I~ -t _-, ---. --, ,-r--: --< ' - -- To SW Cr2dy W"J 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. Proposed No. 2003-0031.2 KING COUNTY Signature Report July 1, 2003 Ordinance 14695 Sponsors Sullivan 1200 King County Courthouse 5l6 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 AN ORDINANCE denying the appeal by the applicant and concurring with the recommendation of the hearing examiner to approve, subject to the conditions recommended by the examiner, a preliminary plat of Evendell, on certain property located on the south side of SE 136th Street, between 158th Avenue SE and 1601h Avenue SE, at the request of U.S. Land Development Association/Centurion, as particularly described in DDES file no. L01P0016. 12 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 13 SECTION 1. This ordinance does hereby adopt and incorporate the findings and 14 conclusions contained in the March 28, 2003 report and recommendation to the King 15 County council by the hearing examiner and adopts as the decision of the council the 16 recommendations by the hearing examiner to deny the application for preliminary plat 17 approval of the proposed plat of 70 lots, received March 26, 2002, and to grant the 1 .,/ -~-~··----------------------------------------- Ordinance 14695 18 application for preliminary approval, subject to the conditions recommended by the 19 examiner, of the proposed 46 lot alternative plat of Evendell, received March 26, 2002, in 20 DDES file no. L01P0016. 21 SECTION 2. The April 18, 2003 appeal by U.S. Land Development 22 Association/Centurion is denied. 23 24 Ordinance 14695 was introduced on 2/3/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 6/30/2003, by the following vote: ATTEST: Yes: 9 -Ms. Sullivan, Ms. Edmonds, Mr. von Reichbauer, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Pelz, Mr. Constantine, Mr. Gossett, Mr. Irons and Ms. Patterson No: 3 -Ms. Lambert, Mr. McKenna and Mr. Hammond Excused: l -Ms. Hague KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASIDNGTON Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council Attachments Hearing Examiner Report dated March 28, 2003 2 ' , 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Proposed No. 2003-0032.2 KING COUNTY Signature Report July 1, 2003 Ordinance 14694 Sponsors Sullivan AN ORDINANCE denying the appeal by U.S. Land 1200 King County Courthouse 516ThirdAveoue Seattle, WA 98104 Development/Centurion and concurring with the recommendation of the hearing examiner to deny the request for reclassification of certain property located on the south side of SE 136th Street, between I5611i Avenue SE and 1601h Avenue SE, as particularly described in DDES file no. L0ITY40L 10 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 11 SECTION 1. This ordinance does hereby adopt and incorporate the findings and 12 conclusions contained in the March 28, 2003 report and recommendation to the King 13 County counciJ by the hearing examiner and adopts as the decision of the council the 14 recommendation by the hearing examiner to deny the application for reclassification of 15 certain property located on the south side of SE 136th Street, between 156th Avenue SE 16 and 160'h Avenue SE, as requested by US Land Development Assocation/Centurion in 17 DOES file no. LOITY401. 1 . • 11 IN FOil.iE ICOl?V -------------- I ,. .. Ordinance 14694 18 SECTION 2. The April 18, 2003 appeal by U.S. Land Development 19 Association/Centurion is denied. 20 Ordinance 14694 was introduced on 2/3/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 6/30/2003, by the following vote: ATTEST: Yes: 9 -Ms. Sullivan, Ms. Edmonds, Mr. von Reichbauer, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Pelz, Mr. Constantine; Mr. Gossett, Mr. Irons and Ms. Patterson No: 3 -Ms. Lambert, Mr. McKenna and Mr. Hammond Excused: I -Ms. Hague KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON C nthia Sullivan, Chair Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council Attachments Hearing Examiner Report dated March 28, 2003 2 ' TO: RE: OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER King County, Washington NOTICE OF APPEAL MEETING DATE PARTIES AND INTERESTED PERSONS Dept. of Development and Environmental Services File Nos. LOIPOOl6 and LOJTY401 Proposed Ordinance No. 2003-0031 and 2003-0032 EVENDELL Proposed Rezone Request (from R-4 to R-6); Proposed 70 lot plat; and Proposed 46 lot alternative plat Action on the appeal from the Report and Decision of the King County Hearing Examiner on the above referenced application is scheduled to be taken by the Metropolitan King County Council at its meeting on June 30, 2003 at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as possible, in Room 1001, Council Chambers, King County Courthouse, 516-3'd Avenue, Seattle, Washington. In order to assist the members of the Council in considering appeals from the Hearing Examiner, the Examiner prepares packages of summary information ("Appeal Packages"). Attached to this notice is the table of contents of the "Appeal Package" prepared for this appeal proceeding, as well as a copy of the Examiner's summary of issues on appeal. These packages are delivered to the members of the Council in advance of the time set for oral appeal arguments. The complete record of the public hearing is also available to the members of the Council for review at their convenience. Presentation of oral arguments to the Council is usually limited to parties to the appeal (those persons who have filed written appeal statements or responses thereto within the allowed time periods). Normally each party to the appeal, or the party's representative, is allowed five minutes for an oral presentation. If there are multiple parties, generally only one person supporting and one person opposing the appeal may provide oral argument, unless all parties supporting a common position agree to a division of time among themselves, or different time allowances are set by the Council. The time limit on presentations does not include time spent responding to questions by the Council, and the Council may also address questions to other persons who are present. All persons who are given an opportunity to speak should keep in mind that the Council's consideration of this appeal is limited by King County Code Section 20.24.220 to the record of the hearing before the Examiner. Therefore, no new evidence may be introduced, and references to factual information must be limited to matters that previously have been introduced into evidence. Any contact with a member of the Council concerning this appeal prior to final action by the Council is prohibited by law. DA TED this 20th day of June, 2003. Stafford L. Smith King County Hearing Examiner /LOIP0016 U)1TY401 lua.doc · Ordinances Concurring with Examiner's Recommendations Vicinity Map Examiner's Summary of Appeal Issues Examiner's Report and Decision Appeal Arguments U.S. Land Development Appeal Responses TABLE OF CONTENTS C.A.R.E./Gwendolyn High & Marsha Rollinger Shirlene Day Mark Costello Fred and Helga Jaques Mr. & Mrs. Edward J. Hill and Kristy Hill Mr. & Mrs. Edward W. Hilton Sally Nipert Michael Rae Cooke Department of Development and Environmental Services Preliminary Report Department of Development and Environmental Services Addendum Report (exhibit 3B) Department of Development and Environmental Services Revised Recommendations and Additional Conditions, dated March IO, 2003 (exhibit 58) Page No. 5 6 IO 33 50 61 62 63 64 65 66 68 71 IOI 108 EXAMINER'S SUMMARY OF APPEAL ARGUMENTS RE: Dept. of Development and Environmental Services File Nos. LOIP0016 and LOITY401 Proposed Ordinance Nos. 2003-0031 and 2003-0032 I. 2. EVENDELL Proposed Rezone Request (from R-4 to R-6); Proposed 70 lot plat; and Proposed 46 lot alternative plat Examiner: Parties to the Appeal: Appellant: Respondents: James N. O'Connor U.S. Land Development, represented by Robert D. Johns and Duana Kolouskova, Attorneys at Law C.A.R.E. (Citizens Alliance for a Responsible Evendell), represented by Gwendolyn High and Marsha Rollinger Shirlene Day Mark Costello Fred and Helga Jaques Mr. & Mrs. Edward J. Hill and Kristy J. Hill Mr. & Mrs. Edward W. Hilton Sally Nipert Michael Rae Cooke 3. Location: South of SE 136" Street, between 156" Avenue SE and 160" A venue SE 4. Issues on Appeal: The appeal arises from three applications: (l) A request to rezone the property from R-4 to R-6; (2) a 70-lot preliminary plat based upon the proposed R-6 zone; and (3) an alternative 46-lot plat based upon the existing R-4 zone. @ 5. •• •• The examiner recommended denial of the rezone and approval of the 46-lot plat, subject to conditions. The appellant/applicant raises two issues on appeal. A. Should the rezone to R-6, and the accompanying 70-lot plat, be approved? B. If not, should the 46-lot plat be subject to the condition that requires dedication of 18 feet of right of way, and construction of improvements along the property frontage on SE 136th Street, from 158th Avenue SE to 160th Avenue SE (condition 8.d., pages 23 and 24). Appellant's Arguments: ODES detennined that the rezone and 70-lot plat complies with Comprehensive Plan policies and code requirements. The 70-lot plat would provide improved access to other properties in the area, and would construct a sewer lift station with excess capacity, providing a public benefit. This site was last rezoned in 1995, from SR-15,000 to R-4. Since that time, the following conditions or circumstances have changed: There have been significant amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, including a new 2000 Comprehensive Plan; All urban development must now be served by sewer; Sewer has become available to the site since 1995; There is a significant shortage of buildable land for detached single family housing; Increased density has been approved and constructed in the vicinity; Renton has annexed property in the area that has been rezoned and developed under the R-8 designation; The R-6 designation is consistent with Renton's Comprehensive Plan; Traffic in the area has increased dramatically. Impacts from the changed conditions affect the subject site differently than other properties in the area because: This site is larger, with more development potential than other sites in the vicinity, so that it can support the cost of improvements that provide benefits and urban services to the area; This site has the potential to open SE 136th Street to create an east-west connector to improve neighborhood circulation. ,,. . ' . Reclassification from R-4 to R-6 is consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies. The request complies with Policy U-118, which requires a minimum density of 4 dwelling units per acre. It complies with Policy U-120, requiring compatibility with the neighborhood. The proposal is within the density range set by the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map for the area, which shows 4-12 dwelling units per acre. R-6 is consistent with the Renton Comprehensive Plan, which sets a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per acre for this potential annexation area. The proposal implements Policy U-122, which supports increases in density when it would help resolve traffic or sewer deficiencies in the immediate neighborhood. The proposal would also help to achieve an average density of 7-8 homes per acre in the Urban Growth Area, consistent with Policy U-114. The required dedication and construction of SE 136th Street for the 46-lot plat violates the constitutional right to substantive due process, and is an unconstitutional taking of applicant's property. The subdivision will not have an impact justifying a required dedication or construction of SE 136th Street. Respondent's Arguments: The 1995 area zoning was not the "last previous area zoning" of the property. The 2000 Comprehensive Plan update was the last previous review and change of development and zoning conditions. There has been no change in conditions since that review. The appellant's statement concerning the shortage ofbuildable lands is untrue. There is sufficient capacity in the whole county and in each sub-area to accommodate growth expected to 2012 and well beyond. The South County Urban Unincorporated Area has a total capacity of 17,283 units; its remaining target to 2012 is 4,935. There is a surplus of 12,384 units. Changes to increase density must only be allowed as infrastructure is constructed. The City of Renton is not planning to increase the density in this area. A range of urban densities is pennitted by.the Comprehensive Plan. The current R-4 zone is within the allowable range for this site. Policy U-114 calls for average zoning density in the Urban Growth Area of 7 to 8 dwelling units per acre. To achieve this average, there must be areas of lower density as well as higher. The applicant has failed to prove changed circumstances since the last area zoning on any point. This property is not affected by any changes any differently than other properties in the area. Policy U-114 states, "A lower density zone may be used to recognize existing subdivisions ... " The subdivision adjacent to the southwest is fully developed at R-4 density. Subdivisions adjacent to the northeast comer have been developed at the R-4 density. There are no developments at density greater than R-4 from 156th Avenue SE all the way east to Issaquah. Policy U-120 states that "King County shall not approve proposed zoning changes to increase density within the Urban Area unless: "a. The development will be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhood; ... " The surrounding development is a neighborhood of single-family homes on large parcels, with many rural characteristics. The examiner recommended denial of the rezone and approval of the 46-lot plat, subject to conditions. The appellant/applicant raises two issues on appeal. A. Should the rezone to R-6, and the accompanying 70-Jot plat, be approved? B. If not, should the 46-lot plat be subject to the condition that requires dedication of 18 feet of right of way, and construction of improvements along the property frontage on SE 136"' Street, from 1581 • Avenue SE to 160"' Avenue SE (condition 8.d., pages 23 and 24). 5. Appellant's Arguments: DOES determined that the rezone and 70-lot plat complies with Comprehensive Plan policies and code requirements. The 70-lot plat would provide improved access to other properties in the area, and would construct a sewer lift station with excess capacity, providing a public benefit. This site was last rezoned in 1995, from SR-15,000 to R-4. Since that time, the following conditions or circumstances have changed: There have been significant amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, including a new 2000 Comprehensive Plan; All urban development must now be served by sewer; Sewer has become available to the site since 1995; There is a significant shortage of buildable land for detached single family housing; Increased density has been approved and constructed in the vicinity; Renton has annexed property in the area that has been rezoned and developed under the R-8 designation; The R-6 designation is consistent with Renton's Comprehensive Plan; Traffic in the area has increased dramatically. Impacts from the changed conditions affect the subject site differently than other properties in the area because: This site is larger, with more development potential than other sites in the vicinity, so that it can support the cost of improvements that provide benefits and urban services to the area; This site has the potential to open SE 136"' Street to create an east-west connector to improve neighborhood circulation. ' EXAMINER'S SUMMARY OF APPEAL ARGUMENTS RE: Dept. of Development and Environmental Services File Nos. LOI POO 16 and LOITY 401 Proposed Ordinance Nos. 2003-003 I and 2003-0032 1. EVENDELL Proposed Rezone Request (from R-4 to R-6); Proposed 70 lot plat; and Proposed 46 lot alternative plat Examiner: James N. O'Connor 2. Parties to the Appeal: Appellant: Respondents: 3. Location: U.S. Land Development, represented by Robert D. Johns and Duana Kolouskova, Attorneys at Law C.A.R.E. (Citizens Alliance for a Responsible Evendell), represented by Gwendolyn High and Marsha Rollinger Shirlene Day Mark Costello Fred and Helga Jaques Mr. & Mrs. Edward J. Hill and Kristy J. Hill Mr. & Mrs. Edward W. Hilton Sally Nipert Michael Rae Cooke South of SE I 36th Street, between 156th Avenue SE and 160th A venue SE 4. Issues on Appeal: The appeal arises from three applications: (I) A request to rezone the property from R-4 to R-6; (2) a 70-lot preliminary plat based upon the proposed R-6 zone; and (3) an alternative 46-lot plat based upon the existing R-4 zone. 5. •• •• The examiner recommended denial of the rezone and approval of the 46-lot plat, subject to conditions. The appellant/applicant raises two issues on appeal. A. Should the rezone to R-6, and the accompanying 70-lot plat, be approved? B. If not, should the 46-lot plat be subject to the condition that requires dedication of 18 feet of right of way, and construction of improvements along the property frontage on SE 136"' Street, from 158"' Avenue SE to 160"' Avenue SE (condition 8.d., pages 23 and 24). Appellant's Arguments: DOES determined that the rezone and 70-lot plat complies with Comprehensive Plan policies and code requirements. The 70-lot plat would provide improved access to other properties in the area, and would construct a sewer lift station with excess capacity, providing a public benefit. This site was last rezoned in 1995, from SR-15,000 to R-4. Since that time, the following conditions or circumstances have changed: There have been significant amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, including a new 2000 Comprehensive Plan; All urban development must now be served by sewer; Sewer has become available to the site since 1995; There is a significant shortage of buildable land for detached single family housing; Increased density has been approved and constructed in the vicinity; Renton has annexed property in the area that has been rezoned and developed under the R-8 designation; The R-6 designation is consistent with Renton's Comprehensive Plan; Traffic in the area has increased dramatically. Impacts from the changed conditions affect the subject site differently than other properties in the area because: This site is larger, with more development potential than other sites in the vicinity, so that it can support the cost of improvements that provide benefits and urban services to the area; This site has the potential to open SE 136"' Street to create an east-west connector to improve neighborhood circulation. ' Reclassification from R-4 to R-6 is consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies. The request complies with Policy U-118, which requires a minimum density of 4 dwelling units per acre. It complies with Policy U-120, requiring compatibility with the neighborhood. The proposal is within the density range set by the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map for the area, which shows 4-12 dwelling units per acre. R-6 is consistent with the Renton Comprehensive Plan, which sets a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per acre for this potential annexation area. The proposal implements Policy U-122, which supports increases in density when it would help resolve traffic or sewer deficiencies in the immediate neighborhood. The proposal would also help to achieve an average density of 7-8 homes per acre in the Urban Growth Area, consistent with Policy U-114. The required dedication and construction of SE 136th Street for the 46-lot plat violates the constitutional right to substantive due process, and is an unconstitutional taking of applicant's property. The subdivision will not have an impact justifying a required dedication or construction of SE 136th Street. Respondent's Argµments: The 1995 area zoning was not the "last previous area zoning" of the property. The 2000 Comprehensive Plan update was the last previous review and change of development and zoning conditions. There has been no change in conditions since that review. The appellant's statement concerning the shortage ofbuildable lands is untrue. There is sufficient capacity in the whole county and in each sub-area to accommodate growth expected to 2012 and well beyond. The South County Urban Unincorporated Area has a total capacity of 17,283 units; its remaining target to 2012 is 4,935. There is a surplus of 12,384 units. Changes to increase density must only be allowed as infrastructure is constructed. The City of Renton is not planning to increase the density in this area. A range of urban densities is pennitted by the Comprehensive Plan. The current R-4 zone is within the allowable range for this site. Policy U-114 calls for average zoning density in the Urban Growth Area of 7 to 8 dwelling units per acre. To achieve this average, there must be areas of lower density as well as higher. The applicant has failed to prove changed circumstances since the last area zoning on any point. This property is not affected by any changes any differently than other properties in the area. Policy U-114 states, "A lower density zone may be used to recognize existing subdivisions ... " The subdivision adjacent to the southwest is fully developed at R-4 density. Subdivisions adjacent to the northeast comer have been developed at the R-4 density. There are no developments at density greater than R-4 from 156th Avenue SE all the way east to Issaquah. Policy U-120 states that "King County shall not approve proposed zoning changes to increase density within the Urban Area unless: "a. The development will be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhood; ... " The surrounding development is a neighborhood of single-family homes on large parcels, with many rural characteristics. 6. •• •• Examiner's Recommendation: Deny the appeal concerning the proposed reclassification to R-6 and the 70-lot preliminary plat. Deny the appeal of that portion of condition "8.d." (pages 23 and 24) that requires dedication and improvement to the SE 136"' Street frontage, provided that the applicant shall have the option to request that the hearing be reopened to allow the introduction of additional evidence in opposition to that requirement, and rebuttal of any such evidence. LOIP0016 LOITY401 lua.doc • ',. '/ OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 850 Union Bank of California Building 900 Fourth A venue Seattle, Washington 98164 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 NOTICE OF LAND USE APPEAL MEETING TIME CHANGE TO: Parties and Interested Persons Clerk of the Council .. June 25, 2003 RE: Dept. of Development and Environmental Services File Nos. L01P0016 & L01TY401 EVENDELL Proposed Plat and Rezone Request The land use appeal meeting for the above reference matter, originally scheduled to be heard by the Metropolitan King County Council at its meeting on June 30, 2003 at 10:00 a.m., has been changed to 9:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as possible, on that same day. in Room 1001, Council Chambers, King County Courthouse, 516-3'd Avenue, Seattle, Washington. ORDERED this 25"' day of June, 2003 mit King County Hearing Examiner \LOIP0016 LOITY401.lua ·--. Dep"artment of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055·1219 File#: Name of Project Applicant: Consultant: Project Location: Project: King County Permits: Permit/SEPA Contact: Threshold Determination: Community Pl;m: Drainage Subbasin: Section/Township/Range: Nr ~~-.!e of Recom'mendation and Hearing L01TY401 & L01P0016 Evendell Howard Stansbury U.S. Land Development Associates Phone: 425-486-2563 Mike Romano, Centurion Development Services 2217 8'" Dr. SE, Bothell, WA 98021 Phone: 425-486-2563 (Type 3 & 4) Located south of SE 136'" between l 56'h Ave. SE and 160°' Ave. SE Proposed is a rezone of 13 acres from R-4 to R-6 and to subdivide the site into 70 lots for detached single-family residences. Should the rezone not be granted, the applicant has proposed an alternative of subdividing the east 11.46 acres under R-4 zoning into 46 lots for detached single-family residential use. Rezone L01TY401, Subdivision L01P0016 Karen Scharer, Planner 206-296-7114 or e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Mitigated Determination ofNonsignificance Newcastle Zoning: R-4 Orting Hills sub basin of Cedar River 14-23-05 Department Recommendation to the Hearing Examiner: Approve subject to conditions Date of Public Hearing: Location of Public Hearing: March 6, 2003 at 9:30 a.m. DOES Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) will issue a written report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two weeks prior to _the scheduled public hearing. Persons wishing to receive a copy of the report should contact DOES at the address listed below. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written recommendation for the rezone and a decision for the plat which may be appealed to the Metropolitan-King County Council. Appeal procedures will be stated in the Examiner's written recommendation and decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact ODES at the address and/or telephone number listed below. Written comments may also be submitted to DOES. A public hearing as required by law will be held to consider the approval of this application. If the Renton School District announces a district-wide school closure due to adverse weather conditions or similar area emergency, the public hearing on this matter will be postponed. Interested parties will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any questions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. I Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296 -6600 If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). WlAIN F'. '"' rr.OWfo!/ F96\SPRS\NOTR&H,T-3 clc 2/6/98 ·-.,. 4CREEKS UAC ATTN~ CLAUDIA DONNELLY PO BOX 3501 RENTON, WA 98056 BRYANT, RONDA 15406 SE 136TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 CARLSON, MARILYN 13616 156TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 CITY OF RENTON ATTN: REBECCA LIND I 055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 CLAUSSEN,KIM SR. PLAT PLANNER DDESI CPLN MS: OAK -DE -0100 COFFIN, RONALD 16015 SE 135TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059-6828 bAY, SHIRLEY 14412 167TH PLACE SE RENTON, WA 98059 DORST AD. ROGER EVERGREEN EAST REALTY PO BOX 375 REDMOND, WA 98073 GILLEN, NICK WETLAND REVIEW DDES/SDSS MS: OAK-DE-0100 LOIPOOJ6 LOJPOOl6 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOl6 LOJPOOJ6 LOIP0016 LOIPOOJ6 LOIPOOl6 LOIP0016 HANSON, STEPHEN & YVONNE 15611 SE 138TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 HARBOUR HOMES KURT WILSON JOJO S. 336TH ST., SUITE #305 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 HEMNES, VALERIE 15627 SE 139TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98058 HIGH, VICTOR & GWENDOLYN 13405 158TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 HILL, EDWARD, JUNE & KRISTY 13527 -156TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 HILTON, EDWARD & NANCY 13414 -158TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 HUGHES, KURT 15646 SE 138TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 JAQUES, FRED AND HELGA 13114 158TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 JOHNSTON, LEONARD J. 16016 SE 135TH RENTON, WA 98059 LOIPOOI6 LOIPOOJ6 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOJ6 LOIPOOJ6 LOJPOOI6 LOJP0016 LOIPOOJ6 LOIPOOJ6 KC EXECUTIVE HORSE COUNCIL ELEANOR MOON 12230 NE 61ST KIRKLAND, WA 98033 KEZELE, DON 15657 SE 137TH PLACE RENTON WA 98059 LANGLEY, KRISTEN LAND USE TRAFFIC DDES/CPLN MS: OAK -DE-0100 LEE.JOANN I 3802 I 60TH A VENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 LEX, TIM & GINA 13116 158TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 LYMAN, STEVE 14505 · 160TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 MARCY, JERRY POST OFFICE BOX 575 SEATTLE, WA 98111 MARTIN, FRED & GLORIA 13019160THAVESE RENTON, WA 98059 MOKIN, BILL 14404 162ND AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 LOIPOOl6 LOlP0016 LOIP0016 LOIPOOl6 LOIP0016 LOIP0016 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOl6 MUHICH, STEVEN & PERI 13420 160TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 NI PERT, SALLY 14004 156TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 NOTT, FLORENCE 15915 SE 134TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 OLIPHANT, RICHARD & ANITA 16519 SE 145TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 PETRIE, DA VE 811 SOUTH 273RD COURT DES MOINES, WA 98198 PLATT, DAVID 510 PANORAMIC DRIVE CAMANO ISLAND, WA 98282 ROGERS, CAROL CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DDES/CPLN MS: OAK-DE-0100 ROLLINGER, MARSHA 15646 SE 138TH PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 ROMANO, MICHAEL CENTURIAN DEVEL. SERVICES 22617 8TH DR SE BOTHELL, WA 98021 LOIP0016 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOI6 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOl6 LO\P0016 SCHARER, KAREN PROJECT PLANNER MS: OAK -DE-0100 DDES/CPLN SCHOLES, GENEVA 12924158THAVESE RENTON, WA 98059 SCHUSTER, CURTIS G JOHN L SCOTT REAL ESTATE 12505 BEL-RED RD, STE 212 BELLEVUE WA 98005 SCOBY, CHARLES & VIOLA ll112158THAVESE RENTON, WA 98059-8531 SIDEBOTHAM, KAREN & JEFFREY 13004 158TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 SLATON, DANIEL B. 15315 SE 133RD COURT RENTON, WA 98059 STANSBURY, HOWARD US LAND DEVL. ASSOC/CENTURION 22617 8TH DR SE BOTHELL, WA 98021 STREIT, PEGGY 13512160THAVENUESE RENTON, WA 98059 THORBECK, PENNY 15650 SE 138TH PL RENTON, WA 98059 LOIP0016 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOl6 LOIP0016 LOIP0016 LOIPOOl6 LOIP0016 L01P0016 LOIPOOl6 WA ST.ECOLOGY DEPT/ WQSW UNIT ATTN: LINDA MATLOCK PO B0X47696 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7696 WATLER, DA YID 15635 SE 138TH PL. RENTON, WA 98059 WEST,LARRY GEO REVIEW DDES/SDSS MS: OAK -DE-0100 WHITTAKER, BRUCE PRELIMINARY REVIEW ENGINEER DOES/ ERS MS: OAK -DE-0100. WILMOT, MR. & MRS. 13900 160TH A VENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 WOLBERG, ALVIN 16021 SE 136TH STREET RENTON, WA 98059 ZEEK, HAROLD & ELEANOR 16621 SE 145TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 LOIPOOl6 LOIP0016 LOIP0016 LOIPOOl6 LOIP0016 LOIP0016 LOIP0016 .. ~-. -~- 3664500278/LO l POO l 6 BECKMAN FRANCIS J JR BECKMAN ROBIN J 13511 158TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 \457500096/LO\P00\6 BOWDEN EDWARD & SHARON I 3939 SE 10TH PL RENTON WA 98058 1423059006/LOIP0016 BRYANT FRANKLYN A & RONDA A 15406 SE 136TH RENTON WA 98059 14230590\9/LOIP0016 CARLSON MARILYNN E 13616156THAVESE RENTON WA 98059 2006000190/LOIP0016 COFFIN RONALD E 16015 SE 135TH RENTON WA 98055 1463400055/LOIP00\6 DONNELLY KEITH E+SHIRLEY C 13805156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 1423059087/LOIP0016 FRANK JOSEPH J 15628 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98059 7418000050/LOIP0016 HALLETT GARY+MAUREEN M 15634 SE 138TH PLACE RENTON WA 98059 7418000150/LOIP0016 HANSON STEPHEN M+YVONNE M 15611 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1423059059/LO\P00\6 HILL EDWARD J JR 13527 156TH SE RENTON WA 98055 ,4._"J9044/LOIPOOl6 BELL HAROLD E 15636 SE 139TH PLACE RENTON WA 98055 1457500090/LO\P00\6 BOWEN VIRGILE 13644 160THAVESE RENTON WA 98056 1423059104/LOIPOOl6 BRYANT LARRY E 15671 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98055 PL50/LOIP0016 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 1423059047/L01P0016 COLONY HOMES INC 1215 120TH AVE NE#201 BELLEVUE WA 98005 1423059033/LO\P00\6 EHLERT DONALD E+EILEEN F 15502 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98056 1423059067/LOIP00\6 GOETLICHER MARK S+SUSAN E 15623 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1463400045/LOIP0016 HALLIN VALERIE L 15415 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98056 \463400051/LOIPOOl6 HENRY ALEXANDER M TTEE 13727156THAVESE RENTON WA 98059 74\8000090/LO\P00\6 HILLJAY PO BOX 507 RENTON WA 98057 2c_,0003001LOIP0016 BONFIGLIO THOMAS L+TERESA L 5253 NE 184TH ST LAKE FOREST PARK WA 98155 7418000040/LOIP0016 BREIMON GENE 20530 SE 130TH ST ISSAQUAH WA 98027 20060002701LOIP0016 BURKS JAMES W 16038 SE 136TH RENTON WA 98055 PL33/LOIPOOI6 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION !055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 2006000140/L01P0016 DA VIES ROBERT A & LORI 14708 30TH NE SEATTLE WA 98126 UAC-FCILO \P00\6 FOUR CREEKS UNINCORPORATED AREA COUNCIL 12819160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 14230590121LOIP0016 HAGERMAN EDWARD G 13710156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 1463400049/LOIP0016 HALLUM JOHN MARTIN+VALERIE 15415 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98056 1463400050/LOIPOOl6 HENRY WILLIAM J TRUSTEE HENRY FAMILY LIVING TRUST 13707156THAVESE RENTON WA 98059 3664500\351LOIPOOJ6 HILTON EDWARD W+NANCY J 13414158TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 9425200040/LO\P00\6 HOPSON VALER!E K 15627 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98059 9425200059/LO\P00\6 JACOBS JEFFREY A+CHARMAINE 15643 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98059 3664500\33/LO\P00\6 JOHNSON WILLIAM 15902 SE 134TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1423059102/LO\P00\6 KEZELE DJ 15657 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98055 1423059074/LUIP00\6 KEZELE DONALD J 15657 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98055 1423059053/LO\P00\6 KNEBEL PAUL J+ MICHELLE 13730156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 1457500095/LOIP00\6 LEE STEVEN P 13802 \60THAVESE RENTON WA 98059 14634000461LO\P0016 MCADAMS CLAYTON A JR 15454 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98055 7418000030/LOIP00\6 MCASKILL DENNIS 1%18 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 9425200050/LOIP00\6 MICHALSKI DAVID CHARLES 15635 SE 139TH ST RENTON WA 98055 7,."J00070/LOIP0016 HUGHES KURT J+CHRISTINE R 15646 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 3664500126/LOIP00\6 JOHNSON GLENDA E 13425 160TH A VENUE SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000150/LO\P00\6 JOHNSTON LEONARD J 16016 SE 135TH RENTON WA 98059 1423059042/LO\P0016 KEZELE DON+DIANE 15657 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 2006000020/LOIP00\6 KNAPP RICHARD A 13412160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 1423059054/LO\P00\6 KNEBEL PAUL JOHN+SANDRA GA! 53 IO 185TH AVE CT E SUMNER WA 98390 2006000200/LOIP00\6 MAGGARD DONALDS 16023 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 \463400048/LO\P00\6 MCADAMS MARY MARTIN 15454 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 _ !457500087/LOIP00\6 MCDONALD KIMBERLY ANNE 6947 COAL CREEK PKWY SE PMB354 NEWCASTLE WA 98059 74!8000020/LOIP00\6 MIDDLETON LARRY D 15614 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98055 \,_J059090/LO\POOl6 HUNIU LEO 15642 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98055 2006000260/LOIP00\6 JOHNSON JOHNNIE M 16046 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98055 1423059086/LO\P00\6 KELLY BYRON D+PAULA M 15620 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1423059051/LO\P00\6 KEZELE DONALD J 15657 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1423059089/LO\P00\6 KNEBEL PAUL J 5310 \85THAVECTE SUMNER WA 98390 74180001 \0/LOIP00\6 KOHR STEPHEN M+SHELLY R 15641 SE 18THPL RENTON WA 98056 \423059022/LO\P00\6 MAIR ROBERT 13606 156TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98056 7418000130/LO\P00\6 MCARTHUR JAN J+LAURA A 15627 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1457500100/LO\P0016 MCNAIR DANNY M PO BOX 18914 SEATTLE WA 98118 7418000\40/LOIP00\6 MIHET BENJAMIN+ESTERA F 15621 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1423059045/LOIPOOl6 MILBRATH DON D 15624 SE 137TH PL RENTOt,i WA 98059 3664500285/LOIP0016 MILL CHARLES V+ CATHERINEM 13434 156TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 7418000100/LOIPOOl6 MULLINS CECIL K 18631 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2006000280/LOIP00!6 NASS LEROY 15713 SE 128TH RENTON WA 98056 2006000160/LO!P0016 NORRIS JOHN B+ROSA M 10516 172ND CT SE RENTON WA 98059 1423059009/LOIPOOl6 NY BLOM DA YID A+DEBRA L ALB! 13606158TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500280/LOIP00!6 OSGOODIJY ELEANOR & VICTOR OSGOODBY BRUCE 13436 156TH SE RENTON WA 98056 9425200080/LOIPOOl6 PAULSEN ROGER A 15657 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98055 1457500085/LOIPOOl6 PLATT DA VID+GEORGIA 510 E PANORAMIC DR CAMANO ISLAND WA 98292 1423059101/LOIPOOl6 POAGUE JOHN+GEORGIA 15111 SE 43RD ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 J,_,J59!12/LO!P00!6 MILBRATH DON D 15624 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 2006000220/LOIP0016 MOELLER STEVEN R 10836 CRESTWOOD DRS SEATTLE WA 98178 9425200070/LOIPOOl6 MURAY AMA PEGGY 15649 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98056 2006000210/LOIPOOl6 NASS LEROY 15713 SE 128TH RENTON WA 98056 3664500127/LOIP0016 NOTTDALEH 13422 158TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500270/LOIP0016 OSGOODBY ALAN G 13527 158TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500279/LOIPOOl6 OSGOODBY JR BRUCE S 13523 158TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500260/LOIPOOl6 PERRY LUCILLE M 13426 156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98056 2006000180/LOIP00!6 PLATZ ERIN D 14627 160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 SDl3/LOIP0016 R. STRACKE, FACILITIES & PLANNING RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT #403 1220 N 4TH ST RENTON WA 98055 1,.J059043/LOIP0016 MILBRATH DON D 15624 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98055 2006000010/LO!POOl6 MUHICH STEVEN C+PERI A 13420 160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 9425200060/LOIPOOl6 MURAYAMA PEGGY H 15649 SE. I 39TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1423059058/LO!P0016 NICHOLS MARKE & BARBARA A 13815 160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500120/LOIPOOl6 NOTT FLORENCE 15915 SE 134TH PL RENTON WA 98059 3664500281/LOIP0016 OSGOODBY BRUCE SHANNON 13456 156TH SE RENTON WA 98055 1457500086/LOIP0016 PAPPAS LONNIE S 16009 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 3664500261/LOIPOOl6 PERRY LUCILLE M 13426 156 A VE SE RENTON WA 98055 3664500141/LOIP00!6 PLATZ GUY E ET AL 13535 160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000130/LO!P0016 ROBERTSON GORDON R+SULTANA 16032 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 1457500097/LOIP0016 ROHRER JIM+SHEILA 21914 N ACULPCO DR SUN CltY WEST AZ 85375 SD8/LOIP0016 STEVE CRAWFORD, NEW CONSTRUCTION ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT #41 I 565 NW HOLLY ST ISSAQUAH WA 98027 7418000080/LOIP0016 TH ORBECK DA VE 15650 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1423059027/LOIP0016 WILLOUGHBY WADE V+NANCY 15612 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1457500088/LOIPOOl6 WOLBERG ALVIN & DIANE 16021 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 7,."J00010/LOIP0016 SPENCER DA YID LEE 13806 156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000170/LOIP0016 STREIT PEGGY ANN 13512 160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 7418000060/LOIP0016 TRUSTY LARRY & CINDY 15640 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1457500101/LOIP0016 WILMOT ROBERT c+CAROL LYNN 13900 160TH SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500131/LOIP0016 WOOD ALVIN R+WENDY S 13403160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 J,_,u59088/LOIP0016 STACHOWIAK CR 15652 SE 139TH PLACE RENTON WA 98055 2006000290/LOIP0016 SULT LINDA R 16022 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 7418000120/LOIP0016 WALTER DA YID M+SHARI D 15635 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 3664500132/LOIP0016 WILSON GARY H+VICKIE LEE 13411 160TH SE RENTON WA 98056 1463400047/LOIP0016 ZOLD KEVIN J+DOROTHY L 13615156THAVESE RENTON WA 98059 -· • (E Re7-,ton). ' FD25 (Spring Glen) FD40 Fire Protection Dist #25 Fire Protection Dist #40 P.O. B.ox 2925 I 0828 SE 176th St · Renton WA 98056-0925 Renton WA 98055 MS: KSC-NR-0600 MS: KSC-TR-0431 KC27 Water & Land Res. Div Gary Kriedt King County Dept of Natural Res. KC Metro Envirn. Planning Steve Foley Lll5 LI20 Fairwood Library Highlands Library 17009 -140th Av SE 2902 NE 12th St Renton WA 98058 Renton WA 98056 Ll23 Documents Dept Librarian Ll24 Kent Regional Library King County Library System 2 l 2 --2nd Av N 960 Newport Way NW Kent WA 98032-4482 Issaquah, WA 98027 Ll36 ATTN: Edward White PLl8 Renton Library Kent Engineering Dept 100 Mill Av S 220 -4th Av S Renton WA 98055 Kent WA 98032 PLl9 City of Renton PL33 Kent Planning Dept Economic Development Dept 220 -4th Av S 1055 S. Grady Way Kent WA 98032 Renton WA 98055 Clinton G. Marsh, Director Fae. & Const Dept SD9 R. Stracke, Facilities & Ping SD13 Kent School District# 415 Renton School Dist # 403 12033 SE 256th St. Bldg B 1220 N 4th St Kent WA 98031-6643 Renton WA 98055 Administrator SES Environmental Review Section ST2 Kent Sewer Utility WA State Dept of Ecology 220 -4th Av S PO Box 47703 Kent WA 98032 Olympia WA 98504-7703 Habitat Biologist, Rod Malcom TRI Russ Ladley, Fisheries Biologist TR2 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Puyallup Tribe 39015 -172nd Av SE 6824 Pioneer Wy E Auburn WA 98002 Puyallup WA 983 71 TR3 Fisheries Habitat/Environment TR5 Snoqualmie Tribe Suquamish Indian Tribe PO Box 280 PO Box 498 Carnation WA 98014-0280 Suquamish WA 98392 Richard Y o,µ~g Tulalip Tribe • 7615 i:o·tem Beach Rd Marysville WA 98271 Public Works Dtr Kent Water Dist 220 -4th Av S Kent WA 98032 Soos Creek Water/Sewer Dist PO Box 58039 Renton WA 98058-1039 Coal Creek Utility District 6801 132nd Place SE Newcastle, WA 98059 WA State Dept. of Wildlife 16018 Mill Creek Blvd. Mill Creek, WA 98012 WA State Dept. of Ecology NW Regional Office 3190 -160th Ave SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 WA St DOT MS 240 15700 Dayton Ave No. PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 WA St. Ecology Dept/WQSW Unit Linda Matlock PO Box 47696 Olympia, WA 98504-7696 Eleanor Moon KC Executive Horse Council 12230 NE 61st Kirkland, WA 98033 TR4 WD23 WD41 WD57 WD12 Cedar River Water/Sewer Dist 18300 SE Lk Youngs Rd Renton WA 8058-9799 City of Renton, Public Works Dept. WD32 Development Services Div. 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 WD55 Water Dist #90 15606 SE 128th St Renton WA 98059-8522 WD58 Water Dist #111 27224 -144th Av SE Kent WA 98042-9058 WA State Dept. of Wildlife Habitat Mgmt. Division P.O. Box 43155 Olympia, WA 98504-3155 WA St.DOT MS 230 15700 Dayton Ave. No PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 WA St.DOT MS 250 15700 Dayton Ave. No. PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Roger Dorstad PO Box 375 Redmond, WA 98073 '~ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Barbara Alther, first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the King County Journal 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the King County Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Proposed Ord 2003-0032 as published on: 2/5/03 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $129.25, charged to Acct. No. 8010112. · The cost above includes a $6.00 fee for the printing of the affidavits. Legal Number 845203 ~--~ ga ~ Subscribed and sworn before me on this ~day of*· 2003 '''"'"'''''' ,,,,, \\ M . ~ ,,,,, '!t.,, \. \. ... _ ......... ( ·"-' ,.,, $'+"····:~s':J\-..!ts .c.,t:'··. (/''-:,. ~ ..... -·~'-'· P.. -:,··. ;;, ~ ~q,-·~ \',,·. ~~ S1:::1l \\otAnr ~ · .. ~:.n·:. ii -0 -:; 'i, \ _ Pun1\C:. . # •-UI-..... --., ~-.,:· .. ~ ~/~~ ",.-tj.··t2a i~--~"-$ ,,,. ,. ........ -:..,··· ~ ............. .... .,,,,, 0 F ~J A$\\\~"/,...,-.., ,,,,,uunu\\\ Notary Public of the State of W;iihington residing in Renton King County, Washington 2003-0032 METROPOLITAN KING COUNTY COUNCIL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN thal the Hearing Examiner of the Metropolitan-King County Council \ will hold a public hearing on Marcl: 1 6, 2003, at the Department of Development and Environmental Services building, 900 SW Oakesdal( Ave SW, Renton, starting at the hom I listed · hereafter, or as soon as possible, and in the order listed fo1 ! purposes of considering applicatiotJ for a rezone ~pproval. 9:30am or a~ soon as thereafter as possible · L01TY401 / Evendell -A Rezon£ ' application j Rezone 13 acres from R-4 to R-6. I Details are available at Blackrive1 j Corporate Plaza, at the Department of Development and Environmental · Services, Land Use Services Division. 1 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest; Renton, WA 98055-1219, 206-296- 6600 (general information number). Dated this 5th day of February 2003. ANNE NORIS CLERK OF TIIE COUNCIL ; METROPOLITAN-KING COUNTY I COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Published in the King county Journal February 5, 2003. #845203 ~ - . ~ t 8 ~ ~ a: ~ §z Affidavit of Publication 1885423 / 2 State of Washington, Counties of King and Snohomish, Daniel S. O'Neal being duly sworn, says that he/she is the Authorized Agent of Seattle Times Company, publisher of The Seattle Times and representing the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, separate newspapers published daily in King and Snohomish Counties, State of Washington: that they are newspapers of general circulation in said Counties and State; that they have been approved as legal newspapers by orders of the Superior Court of King and Snohomish Counties; that the annexed, being a classified advertisement, was published in: Newspaper ' . l{iililiciitlaii;Date . The Seattle Times 02/06/03 And not in a supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed and/or distributed in the regular and entire issue of said paper or papers during all of said period, and that said newspaper or newspapers were regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of · ~idpcriod. ~ Subscribed and sworn to before me this 11'" day of February, 2003 ~ •• STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Allison Fryer, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The Eastside Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Eastside Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a NOT/Cc 0£ f>c.f!.Mlr /{£1Jfl!Y(, /IN() !2.E( 0 f'1 !'1E. N 04 T? ON was published on TIil/. d /(, / 0? , / I The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ /6 S-. 6 0 at the rate of c29-<JO per inch for the first publication and NA per inch for each subsequent insertion. 04 ?'.2 :z ----'"'''' on -~., __ x: A J ,,, Allison Fryer tJ _:-~\,~::: .. : .. ~C,t'•1 Legal Advertising Representative, King County Journal {.{f.-:;-.,."i>s,ON_t:.,:;, .. _<S"0 111 Subscribed and sworn t_Le this day f J,Z,::-;,:,-.,\20,,&J~ -.;,·. 't-11 I ! Q -.U .. " r ·l'f\: I : en : ~ • • ~ ,.___,._... ,, \..,UC . j 't (J, ••• •·· ~ .:-,, ~ · .. 1.1.ao ,·· ,o ~ , Residing in Sanlm~''~:·Wll);'lii£"OJT ·ii''OFWASI-.~:.. ,, --,,,,, ..... --P.O. No. ___________ _ Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DDES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219 NOTICE OF PERMIT HEARING & RECOMMENDATIDN LAND USE SERVICES l>MSIQN Request: Formal Subdivision and Rezone File: L01P0016 & L01TY401 File Name: Evendell Subdivision and Rezone Applicant: Howard Stansbury, US Land Development Assoc. Location: Located south of SE 136th, between 156th Ave SE and 160th Ave SE. Proposal: A rezone of 13 acres from R-4 to R-6 and to subdivide int.o 70 lots for detached single-family residences. Should the rezone not be granted, the proposal would be to subdivide into 46 lots. Project Planner: Karen Scharer, (206) 296-7114 Hearing Date and Time: March 6, 2003 at 9:30 a.m. Location of Public Hearing: DOES, Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Dept. Recommendation to Hearing Examiner: Approve subject . to conditions. Comment Procedures: Comments on the above file are now being accepted by King County ODES, Land Use Services Division, at the address listed above. Phone: 206-296- 6600 Published in the King County Journal February 6, 2003. #842635 i '!\ ~ ! ~ Affidavit of Publication 1881339 / 3 State of Washington, Counties of King and Snohomish, Daniel S. O'Neal being duly sworn, says that he/she is the Authorized Agent of Seattle Times Company, publisher of The Seattle Times and representing the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, separate newspapers published daily in King and Snohomish Counties, State of Washington: that they are newspapers of general circulation in said Counties and State; that they have been approved as legal newspapers by orders of the Superior Court of King and Snohomish Counties; that the annexed, being a classified advertisement, was published in: Newspaper 'Publication ,bate ,, '' The Seattle Times 02/05/03 And not in a supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed and/or distributed in the regular and entire issue of said paper or papers during all of said period, and that said newspaper or newspapers were regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. Subscribed and sworn to before me this l l 'h day of February, 2003 ·---• .. Rogers, Carol < From: Rogers, Carol Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:56 AM To: Subject: 'ggreen@seattletimes.com'; 'legals.bellevue@kingcountyjournal.com' Legal ad for publ. on Thursday, 2/6 Please confirm receipt. Please publish the accompanying, legal notice in your newspaper on THURSDAY February 6 2003, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please call or fax me lromedlately. Submit your invoice and 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to Accounts Payable as soon after publication as possible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (ODES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219 NOTICE OF PERMIT HEARING & RECOMMENDATION LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION Request: Formal Subdivision and Rezone File: L01 P0016 & L01TY401 File Name: Evendell Subdivision and Rezone Applicant: Location: Howard Stansbury, US Land Development Assoc. Located south of SE 136", between 1561" Ave SE and 160th Ave SE. Proposal: Project Planner: Hearing Date and Time: Location of Public Hearing: Dept. Recommendation to A rezone of 13 acres from R-4 to R-6 and to subdivide into 70 lots for detached single-family residences. Should the rezone not be granted, the proposal would be to subdivide into 46 lots. Karen Scharer, (206) 296-7114 March 6, 2003 at 9:30 a.m. DDES, Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Hearing Examiner: Approve subject to conditions. Comment Procedures: Comments on the above fil8 are now being accepted by King County DDES, Land Use Services Division. at the address listed above. Phone: 206-296-6600 Published this 6'" day of February, 2003. cc: Accounts Payable, Administrative Services Division, DOES Application File(s): L01P0016/L01TY401: Evendell plat and rezone hearing notice. Thanks, Carol Rogers 206-296-7116 1 Legal :1d for pub!. on Thursday, 2/6 . . • Rogers, Carol From: Tom Meagher Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:06 AM To: Rogers, Carol Subject: RE: Legal ad for publ. on Thursday, 2/6 Hi, Carol ... Happy Friday! Page 1 of2 I have received your email, and will publish the notice (Re/File Nos. L01P0016 and L01TY401) in the 2/06/03 edition of the King County Journal. Thanks a lot, Carol. .. have a great day! Tom Meagher Legal Advertising Representative King County Journal Newspapers Phone: 425-453-4296 Fax: 425-635-0602 -----Original Message----- From: Rogers, Carat [mailto:Carot.Rogers@METROKC.GOV] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:56 AM To: 1ggrecn@seattletimes.com1 ; 1legals.bellevue@kingcountyjoumal.com' Subject: Legal ad for pubt. on Thursday, 2/6 Please confirm receipt. Please publish the accompanying, legal notice in your newspaper on THURSDAY, February 6. 2003, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please call or fax me immediately. Submit your invoice and 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to Accounts Payable. as soon after publication as possible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DDES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW. Renton. WA 98055-1219 NOTICE OF PERMIT HEARING & RECOMMENDATION LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION Request: File: File Name: Applicant: Location: Proposal: 01/31/2003 Formal Subdivision and Rezone L01P0016 & L01TY401 Evendell Subdivision and Rezone Howard Stansbury, US Land Development Assoc. Located south of SE 135th, between 156th Ave SE and 160th Ave SE. A rezone of 13 acres from R-4 to R-6 and to subdivide into 70 lots Legal <1dfor µubl. on Thursday, 2/6 . . .. .. Rogers, Carol From: Grace Green Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:17 AM To: Rogers, Carol Subject: RE: Legal ad for publ. on Thursday, 2/6 Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Rogers, Carol [mailto:Carol.Rogers@METROKC.GOV] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:56 AM To: Grace Green; 'legals.bellevue@kingcountyjournal.com' Subject: Legal ad for publ. on Thursday, 2/6 Please confirm receipt. .. Please publish the accompanying, legal notice in your newspaper on THURSDAY, February 6. 2003. which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please call or fax me immediately. Submit your invoice and 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to Accounts Payable. as soon after publication as possible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DOES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW. Renton. WA 98055-1219 NOTICE OF PERMIT HEARING & RECOMMENDATION LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION Request: File: File Name: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Formal Subdivision and Rezone L01P0016 & L01TY401 Evendell Subdivision and Rezone Howard Stansbury, US Land Development Assoc. Located south of SE 1361h, between 155th Ave SE and 1601h Ave SE. A rezone of 13 acres from R-4 to R-6 and to subdivide into 70 lots for detached single-family residences. Should the rezone not be granted, the proposal would be to subdivide into 46 lots. Project Planner: Karen Scharer, (206) 296-7114 Hearing Date and Time: March 6, 2003 at 9:30 a.m .. Location of Public Hearing: ODES, Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Dept. Recommendation to Hearing Examiner: Approve subject to conditions. Comment Procedures: Comments on the above file are now being accepted by King County DOES, Land Use Services Division, at the address listed above. Phone: 206-296-6600 Published this 5th day of February. 2003. cc: Account~ Payable, Administrative Services Division, DOES 01/31/2003 Page I of2 ~ ~ = ~ ~ ffi Ii) 0 ~ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Christina Meyers, first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a L01P0016 & L01TY401 as published on: 10/4/01 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $113.00, charged to Acct. No. 8030903. The cost above includes a $6.00 fee for the printing of the affidavits. Subscribed and sworn before me on this S~ay of {!Ja:, , 2001 ''''''""'''' ,,,,, t \\ r:, r-'',,,, ~'~~---··;,::;···-. /}/ .. ,, ~ ~ .--..~:,.s ... -~ .. ( :',, ..;;;:'..... ··~,, . ., ~,iq, ... ~ A--~ E~! ·:-.0-r,~1:-;-,)~ ~jOeb fu<~~ Notary Public of the State of Washington residing in Renton King County, Washington E ~ -c--§ ~ \ ,/>\<> Pu:L\', ,. : 2 ~·-.I/' ~ .... ~~ ~ 4>"·.~ 2 6 '2. ~...--<~ ~ ~,,. ~ 0 ·······'······ Vo~ ... ~ 11'11 F WAS\\\ ,,,,, 11IU It ll UI\ \ '' KJNG COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & i ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES I 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, . Renton, WA 98055-1219 : NOTICE OF LANO USE • PERMIT APPLICATION I ; REQUEST: FORMAL Pl.AT H,. ' , REZONE ' : File: l01P0016 & L01TY401 i File Name: Evendell Rezone & Plat , ; Applicant: Centurian Develop. I i Services/Howard Stansbury i location: South of SE 136th St. : between 156th Ave. SE and 160th i 1 Ave. SE 1 Proposal: Rezone 13 acres of I property from R-4 to R-6 and divide site into 75 lots for detached single-1 I family homes. / Project Planner: Karen Scharer i (206) 296-7114 . COMMENT PROCEDURES:/ / , Comments on the above file are now , being accepted by King County , ODES, Land Use Services Division, ; at the address listed above. Phone: 1 206-296-6600. I Published in the South. County ; Journal October 4, 2001. 9581 : I -_/ • ' ' fj .. 1021073 I 2 f) : ., i ' I t '.. . ') Affidavit of fvM~1i,irrJi~~ ' I.: /IQ: 12 l'C.C.LJ.D.£.s. State of Washington, Counties of King and Snohomish, Brandon Darrow being duly sworn, says that he/she is the Authorized Agent of Seattle Times Company, publisher of The Seattle Times and representing the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, separate newspapers published daily in King and Snohomish Counties, State of Washington: that they are newspapers of general circulation in said Counties and State; that they have been approved as legal newspapers by orders of the Superior Court of King and Snohomish Counties: that the annexed, being a classified advertisement, was published in: l'ublicati"'" Dat<l The Seattle Times l 0/04/01 And not in a supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed and/or distributed in the regular and entire issue of said paper or papers during all of said period, and that said newspaper or newspapers were regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. • Subscribed and sworn to before me this 5th day of October 2001 \ DEPT.KJ~i~e~~6~MENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVIC· 900 Oakes:a~e Ave SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219 NOTICE OF LAND USE PERM\T APPLICATION • ~6~~1i1 ~LAT & REZONE I File: LOl P0016 & L.OlTY 401 File Nome: ' evendell Rezone & Plot Applicant: centurion Develop. ' serv/Howard Stonsburv Location: South of SE 136th St, between 156th Ave. SE and 160th Ave. SE Proposal: Rezone 13 acres ~ ', property from R-4 to R.-i, and di- vide slte into 75 lots for detached sino;ile-fomllY homes. · Prolect Planner: Koren Scharer (206) 296-7114 COMMENT PROCEOURES: Comments on the obove flle (_Ire now being occePted by King counlv ODES, Lond use Services Divls\on, ot the address 11sted obove. Phone: 206-296-6600, Published this 4h dov of October, 2001 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 DATE: September 28, 2001 TIME: FAX TO: SEATTLE TIMES LEGAL ADS ATTN: GRACE GREEN (206) 652-6527 FAX#: 206-515-5595 (email: ggreen@seattletimes.com) NOTE: NO HARD COPY WILL BE SENT # OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): 2 SENDERS NAME: SENDERS PHONE: Patricia Malone, Office Tech. Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division 206-296-6603; (Fax: 206-296-7051) Please publish the accompanying legal notice in you·r newspaper on THURSDAY, October 4, 2001, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please call or fax me immediately. Submit your invoice and 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to Accounts Payable as soon after publication as possible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice cc: Accounts Payable, Administrative Services Division, DOES Application File(s): L01P0016 & L01TY401 (Centurian Develop. Services) -Notice of Application MAIN FILE COPY I ' ' IVlaione, Patricia From: Grace Green[SMTP:ggreen@seattletimes.com] Friday, September 28, 2001 10:11 AM Sent: To: 'Malone, Patricia' Subject: RE: Publication Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Malone, Patricia [mailto:Patricia.Malone@METROKC.GOV] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 10:07 AM To: 'ggreen@seattletimes.com' Subject: Publication Hi Grace, Please publish the following on Thursday, Oct. 4th. Thanks. KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219 NOTICE OF LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUEST: FORMAL PLAT & REZONE File: L01P0016 & L01TY401 File Name: Evendell Rezone & Plat Applicant: Centurian Develop. Serv/Howard Stansbury Location: South of SE 136'" St. between 156'" Ave. SE and 160'" Ave. SE Proposal: Rezone 13 acres of property from R-4 to R-6 and divide site into 75 lots for detached single-family homes .. Project Planner: Karen Scharer (206) 296-7114 COMMENT PROCEDURES: Comments on the above file are now being accepted by King County DOES, Land Use Services Division, at the address listed above. Phone: 206-296-6600. Published this 4h day of October, 2001 Page 1 ' . ., ® King County Department of Development and Enviromnental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 DATE: September 28, 200 I TIME: FAX TO: SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL A TIN: KA THY FEHLINGS / Legal Ads FAX#: 253-854-1006 NOTE: NO HARD COPY WILL BE SENT # OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): 2 SENDERS NAME: SENDERS PHONE: Patricia Malone, Office Tech. Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division 206-296-6603; (Fax: 206-296-7051) Please publish the accompanying, legal notice in your newspaper on THURSDAY, October 4, 2001, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement Should this not be possible, please call or fax me immediately. Submit your invoice and 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to Accounts Payable as soon after publication as possible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment Attachment: Legal Notice cc: Accounts Payable, Administrative Services Division, DDES Application File(s): L01P0016 & LOOTY401 (Centurian Develop. Services)-Notice of Application • KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENT AL SERVICES 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219 NOTICE OF LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUEST: FORMAL PLAT & REZONE File: L01P0016 & L01TY401 File Name: Evendell Rezone & Plat Applicant: Centurian Develop. Services/Howard Stansbury Location: South of SE 1361h St. between 1561h Ave. SE and 1601h Ave. SE Proposal: Rezone 13 acres of property from R-4 to R-6 and divide site into 75 lots for detached single-family homes. Project Planner: Karen Scharer (206) 296-7114 COMMENT PROCEDURES: Comments on the above file are now being accepted by King County ODES, Land Use Services Division, at the address listed above. Phone: 206-296-6600. Published this 4 11 day of October, 2001 I~ ' cr CJ Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division Notice of App.iication 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (Type 4) Applicant: Howard Stansbury U.S. Land Development Associates c/o Centurian Development Services 22617 S'h Drive SE File #'s: L01TY401 & L01P0016 File Name: Evendell Rezone & Plat DDES Planner: Karen Scharer Bothell, WA 98021 Planner Telephone No. (206) 296-7114 Planner E-Mail: karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Date Application Filed: July 6, 2001 Date Determined Complete: September 20, 2001 Project Loca.tion: The site is located south of SE 136'h Street between 156'h Avenue SE and 160'h Avenue SE. Project Description: The proposal is to rezone 13 acres of property from R-4 to R-6 and to divide the site into 75 lots for detached single-family homes. Should the rezone not be granted, the applicant has proposed an alternative to subdivide a smaller portion of 11.46 acres under R-6 zoning into 44 lots for development o~ single-family use. Permits requested in this application: Rezone and Formal Plat Relevant environmental documents are available at the address below: Yes Development regulations to be used for project mitigation, known at this time: KCC 21A and KCC 19A Consistency with applicable County plans and regulations: This project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County Codes including Road Standards, Surface Water Management Design Manual, and Sensitive Area Regulations. I Other permits not included in this application, known at this time: Building Permits. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all of the required permits. A public hearing before the King County Hearing Examiner is required for this application. Notification of the public hearing date will occur approximately 30 days prior to the scheduled hearing. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) will issue a report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two (2) weeks prior to the scheduled public hearing. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written recommendation on the rezone and decision regarding the plat which may be appealed to the Metropolitan-King County Council. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice of recommendation. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact DDES at the address and/or telephone number listed below. Written comments may also be submitted to DDES. You may review the application and any environmental documents or studies in our Renton office. NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Mailing Date: October 4. 200 I ===-========--====-===--====-====================== Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning this application. File No's: L01TY401 & L01P0016 -Evendell Rezone & Plat Name: ----------------------------------- Address: ______________________________ _ --------------------Telephone No.: --------- MAIN FILE COPY P96\11pra\UO .lp\Type-4 .noa 7/11/96· 9 ,40,M/dj I' ' -----,:;:ii,: __ _ ·-~~- ' ·~ ) ' BULL, TRISHAH PL:ANNER DDES /CPLN MS: OAK -DE-0100 CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 22617 8TH DR SE BOTHELL, WA 9802 I CLAUSSEN.KIM SR. PLAT PLANNER DDES /CPLN MS: OAK -DE -0100 DARROW, ROBERT 13428 45TH CT MUKILTEO, WA 98275 DORSTAD, ROGER EVERGREEN EAST REAL TY 16651 NE 79TH ST REDMOND WA 98052 DRY CO SURVEYING & MAPPING ATTN: PROJECT MGR 31218 PACIFIC HWY SO FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 GILLEN, NICK WETLAND REVIEW DDES /SDSS MS: OAK -DE-0100 KC EXECUTIVE HORSE COUNCIL ELEANOR MOON 12230NE61ST KIRKLAND, WA 98033 MARCY, JERRY PO BOX 575 SEATTLE WA 981 I I .. LOIPOOl6 LOJPOOl6 LOJPOOl6 LOJPOOl6 LOJP0016 LOIP0016 LOIPOOJ6 LOJP0016 LOJPOOJ6 MCMANUS, AILE~ LAND USE TRAFFIC DDES /CPLN MS: OAK -DE-0100 ROGERS, CAROL CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DDES /CPLN MS: OAK-DE-0100 SCHARER, KAREN PROJECT PLANNER MS: OAK -DE-0100 DDES/CPLN SCHUSTER, CURTIS G JOHN L SCOTT REAL ESTATE 12505 BEL-RED RD, STE 212 BELLEVUE WA 9805 STANSBURY, HOWARD E US LAND DEVELOPMENT PO BOX 22200 SEATTLE WA 98122-0200 WA ST.ECOLOGY DEPT/ WQSW UNIT ATTN: LINDA MATLOCK PO BOX 47696. OLYMPIA WA 98504-7696 WEST, LARRY GEO REVIEW DDES/SDSS MS: OAK -DE-0100 WHITTAKER, BRUCE PRELIMINARY REVIEW ENGINEER DOES /ERS MS: OAK -DE-0100 LOJP0016 LOJPOOJ6 LOIPOOl6 LOIPOOJ6 LOJPOOJ6 LOJPOOJ6 LOJPOOJ6 LOIPOOJ6 MAIN FILE COPY r; ' ~ ' ' .-.. r ·. ( SEPA/SPR DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL FORM File Name euenJOBZL teztJAJB ..;--lt./.PI File NoL!JlfaJ!lo fl{){r/t/o/ Document _ __,M._,._...;;lJ...:..~...:.._ __ _ Date The agencies listed below receive the docu- ments checked unless BIG 9 Metro Env Planning Ecology Fish/Wildlife (Mill Cr) Fish/Wildlife (Oly) SUMMARY King Co Agen (KC) Council (13) Health (Env Health) Historic Preservation Housing/Econ Dev Parks Planning/Comm Dev Public Safety PW/Roads PW/Solid Waste PW/SWM Libraries (LI) King Co System Seattle Public (Govt) Newspapers (NP) Daily Jour of Comm Issaquah Press Journal-American Morning News Trib Northshore Citizen Seattle P-1 Seattle Times Snoqualmie Val Rep Valley Daily News Woodinville Weekly Eastside Week Beachcomber otherwise indicated: Sum TD ECL Plan X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9-}e ---{JI Staff Name /{. $If/Me£_ Use GRP codes on the master mailing list to AlOk 0th . ' ,. ~ indicate additional organizations/agencies below which are to receive the documents checked: NOD TD ECL Plan Comm Grps (CG) Fire Districts (FD) ::15, t/0 Federal Agen (FE) King Co Agen (KC) ;,f~e?Ck~).2.t- Ndwspapers (NP) - ;/lj?f'i~ [~L Regi6,~) tfhr/~ ·st (SD) ~e "''-t (SE) ,s State (ST) Utilities (UT) !:li Water Dist CWJf <;-~~ State Agencies (ST) Natural Resources Parks Transportation I ~ I I I I I ; ;;;j,, -?21-t! l.;. i DOES Staff ; Tribes (TR) Muckleshoot Puyallup Snoqualmie Tulalip Suquamish X X X X X X X X X X No. of 500-foot labels (attached): No. of PO~? (attached): /O-'f-O I Date of Mailing ,t riO-- X X X X X X X X . X X . 1(/ Staff Member .Qllt- .. ' I MAIN FILE COPY FORMSIF961SPRSISEPA.TRANSMITIAL.DOC 419199 clc ' . ' ' ' ~• ...:.,~=--·-"·. -• I ). . '!', .J.t:~:~ ' .. -:J:.--' .. CJ5_67° CJO,\ (E Renton) FD25 (Spring Glen) ~25? FD40 Fire Protection Dist #25 Fire Protection Dist #40 P.O. Box 2925 10828 SE 176th St Renton WA 98056-0925 Renton WA 98055 Ll15 LI20 Fairwood Library Highlands Library 17009 -140th Av SE 2902 NE 12th St Renton WA 98058 Renton WA 98056 LI23 LI36 Kent Regional Library Renton Library 212--2ndAvN 100 Mill Av S Kent WA 98032-4482 Renton WA 98055 ATIN: Edward White PL18 PL19 Kent Engineering Dept Kent Planning Dept 220-4thAvS 220 -4th Av S Kent WA 98032 Kent WA 98032 Clinton G. Marsh, Director Fae. & Const. Dept SD9 Administrator SES Kent School District# 415 Kent Sewer Utility 12033 SE 256th St. Bldg B 220-4thAvS Kent WA 98031-6643 Kent WA 98032 WD12 Public Works Dtr WD23 Cedar River Water/Sewer Dist Kent Water Dist 18300 SE Lk Youngs Rd 220-4thAvS Renton WA 8058-9799 Kent WA 98032 City of Renton, Public Works Dept. WD32 WD41 Development Services Div. Soos Creek Water/Sewer Dist 1055 South Grady Way PO Box 58039 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98058-1039 WD55 WD57 Water Dist #90 Coal Creek Utility District 15606 SE !28th St 6801 132nd Place SE Renton W A.98059-8522 Newcastle, WA 98059 WD58 Water Dist #111 I 27224 -144th Av SE PO Box 330 } Kent WA 98042-9058 Attn: J Suther! l e,WA 98133 B 9425200040/L01P0016 HOPSON V ALERlE K 15627 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98059 9425200059/LOIP0016 JACOBS JEFFREY A+CHARMAINE 15643 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98059 3664500133/L01P0016 JOHNSON WILLIAM 15902 SE 134TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1423059102/L01P0016 KEZELE DJ 15657 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98055 1423059074/L01P0016 KEZELE DONALD J 15657 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98055 1423059053/L01P0016 KNEBEL PAUL J+ MICHELLE 13730 156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 1457500095/L01P0016 LEESTEYENP 13802 160TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 1463400046/L01P0016 MCADAMS CLAYTON A JR 15454 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98055 7418000030/L01P0016 MCASKILL DENNIS 15618 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 9425200050/LOIP0016 MICHALSKI DA YID CHARLES 15635 SE 139TH ST RENTON WA 98055 =--~7418000070/L01P0016 --' HUGHES KURT J+CHRlSTINE R 15646 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 3664500126/LOIP0016 JOHNSON GLENDA E 13425 160TH A VENUE SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000150/L01P0016 JOHNSTON LEONARD J 16016 SE 135TH RENTON WA 98059 1423059042/LOlPOOl 6 KEZELE DON+DIANE 15657 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 2006000020/LO 1 POO 16 KNAPP RlCHARD A 13412160THAYESE RENTON WA 98059 1423059054/LOIP0016 KNEBEL PAUL JOHN+SANDRA GA! 5310 185TH AVE CT E SUMNER WA 98390 2006000200/LO 1 POO 16 MAGGARD DONALD S 16023 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 1463400048/LO 1 POO 16 MCADAMS MARY MARTfN 15454 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1457500087/L01P0016 MCDONALD KIMBERLY ANNE -,ai.1423059090/L01P0016. , \.._,.,IHUNIU LEO 15642 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98055 2006000260/L01P0016 JOHNSON JOHNNIE M 16046 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 9805 5 1423059086/L01P0016 KELLY BYRON D+PAULA M 15620 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1423059051/LO lPOOl 6 KEZELE DONALD J 15657 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1423059089/L01P0016 KNEBEL PAUL J 5310 185TH AYECTE SUMNER WA 98390 7418000110/L01P0016 KOHR STEPHEN M+SHELL Y R 15641 SE 18TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1423059022/L01P0016 MAIR ROBERT 13606 156TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98056 7418000130/LOIP00!6 MCARTHUR JAN J+LAURA A 15627 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 6947 COAL CREEK PKWY SE PMB354 NEWCASTLE WA 98059 1457500100/L01P0016 MCNAIR DANNY M PO BOX 18914 SEATTLE WA 98118 7418000020/L01P0016 MIDDLETON LARRY D 15614 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98055 7418000140/L01P0016 MIHET BENJAMIN+ESTERA F 15621 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 ,-'- , ' . 3664500278/L01P0016 BECKMAN FRANCIS J JR BECKMAN ROBIN J 1351 l 158TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 1457500096/LOlPOOl 6 BOWDEN EDWARD & SHARON I 3939 SE 10TH PL RENTON WA 98058 1423059006/LOl POOl 6 BRYANT FRANKLYN A & RONDA A 15406SE 136TH RENTON WA 98059 1423059019/L01P0016 CARLSON MARILYNN E 13616 156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000190/L01P0016 COFFIN RONALD E 16015 SE 135TH RENTON WA 98055 1463400055/L01P0016 DONNELLY KEITH E+SHIRLEY C 13805 156TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 1423059087/L01P0016 FRANK JOSEPH J 15628 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98059 7418000050/L01P0016 HALLETT GARY+MAUREEN M 15634 SE 138TH PLACE RENTON WA 98059 7418000150/L01P0016 HANSON STEPHEN M+YVONNE M 15611 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1423059059/L01P0016 HILL EDWARD J JR 13527156THSE RENTON WA 98055 1 ~059044/L01P0016 BELL HAROLD E 15636 SE 139TH PLACE RENTON WA 98055 l457500090/LOlPOOl6 BOWEN VIRGIL E 13644 160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98056 l423059104/L01P00l6 BRYANT LARRY E 15671 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98055 PL50/L01P0016 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 l423059047/L01P0016 COLONY HOMES INC 1215 120TH AVE NE #201 BELLEVUE WA 98005 1423059033/L01P0016 EHLERT DONALD E+EILEEN F 15502 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98056 1423059067/L01P0016 GOETLICHER MARK S+SUSAN E 15623 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1463400045/LO!POO!G HALLIN VALERIE L 15415 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98056 1463400051/L01POOJ6 HENRY ALEXANDER M TTEE 13727 156TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 7418000090/L01P0016 HILL JAY PO BOX 507 RENTON WA 98057 ~000300/LOIPOOJ6 BONFIGLIO THOMAS L+TERESA L 5253 NE 184TH ST LAKE FOREST PARK WA 98155 7418000040/L01POOJ6 BREIMON GENE 20530 SE 130TH ST ISSAQUAH WA 98027 2006000270/L01P0016 BURKS JAMES W 16038 SE 136TH RENTON WA 98055 PL33/LO 1 POOl 6 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION I 055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 2006000140/LOIP0016 DA VIES ROBERT A & LORI I 4 708 30TH NE SEATTLE WA 98126 UAC-FC/LOJPOOIG FOUR CREEKS UNINCORPORATED AREA COUNCIL 12819 160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 1423059012/LOIP0016 HAGERMAN EDWARD G 13710 156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 1463400049/LOlPOOl 6 HALLUM JOHN MARTIN+VALERIE 15415 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98056 1463400050/L01POOJ6 HENRY WILLIAM J TRUSTEE HENRY FAMILY LIVING TRUST 13707 156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500135/L01P0016 HILTON EDWARD W+NANCY J 13414 158TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 9425200040/LOIP0016 HOPSON V ALERJE K 15627 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98059 9425200059/LOIPOOI6 JACOBS JEFFREY A+CHARMAINE 15643 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98059 '· 3664500133/LOIP0016 JOHNSON WILLIAM 15902 SE 134TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1423059102/LOIPOOI6 KEZELE DJ 15657 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98055 1423059074/LOIPOOI6 KEZELE DONALD J 15657 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98055 1423059053/LOIPOOI6 KNEBEL PAUL J+ MICHELLE 13730 156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 1457500095/LOIPOOI6 LEESTEVENP 13802160THAVESE RENTON WA 98059 1463400046/LOIPOOI6 MCADAMS CLAYTON A JR 15454 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98055 7418000030/LOIPOOI6 MCASKILL DENNIS 15618 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 9425200050/LOIPOOI6 MICHALSKI DA YID CHARLES 15635 SE 139TH ST RENTON WA 98055 ~418000070/LOIPOOI6 ~UGHES KURT J+CHRISTINE R 15646 SE 138TH PL .1423059090/LO I POO 16. . ,, HUNJULEO RENTON WA 98059 3664500126/L01POOI6 JOHNSON GLENDA E 13425 160TH A VENUE SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000150/LOIPOOI6 JOHNSTON LEONARD J 16016 SE 135TH RENTON WA 98059 1423059042/LOIP0016 KEZELE DON+DIANE 15657 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 2006000020/LO I POO 16 KNAPP RICHARD A 13412 160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 1423059054/LOIP0016 KNEBEL PAUL JOHN+SANDRA GAi 5310185THAVECTE SUMNER WA 98390 2006000200/L01POOI6 MAGGARD DONALD S 16023 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 1463400048/LOIP0016 MCADAMS MARY MARTIN 15454 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1457500087/LOIP0016 MCDONALD KIMBERLY ANNE 6947 COAL CREEK PKWY SE PMB354 NEWCASTLE WA 98059 7418000020/L01P0016 MIDDLETON LARRY D 15614 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98055 15642 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98055 2006000260/LOIPOOI6 JOHNSON JOHNNIE M 16046 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98055 1423059086/L01P0016 KELLY BYRON D+PAULA M 15620 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1423059051/L01P0016 KEZELE DONALD J 15657 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1423059089/L01P0016 KNEBEL PAUL J 5310 185TH AVE CT E SUMNER WA 98390 7418000110/LOIPOOI6 KOHR STEPHEN M+SHELL YR 15641 SE 18TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1423059022/LOI POOl 6 MAIR ROBERT 13606 156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98056 7418000130/L01P0016 MCARTHUR JAN J+LAURA A 15627 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1457500100/LOIP0016 MCNAIR DANNY M PO BOX 18914 SEATTLE WA 98118 7418000140/L01P0016 MIHET BENJAMIN+ESTERA F 15621 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 ,- . ' ' . 1423059045/LOIPOOl6 MILERA TH DON D 15624 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98059 3664500285/LO I POO 16 MILL CHARLES V+ CATHERINEM 13434 156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 7418000100/LOIP0016 MULLINS CECIL K 18631 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2006000280/LO I POO 16 NASS LEROY 15713 SE 128TH RENTON WA 98056 2006000160/LO 1 POO 16 NORRIS JOHN B+ROSA M 10516 172ND CT SE RENTON WA 98059 1423059009/L01P0016 NYBLOM DA YID A+DEBRA L ALB! 13606 158TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500280/L01P0016 OSGOODBY ELEANOR & VICTOR OSGOODBY BRUCE 13436 156TH SE RENTON WA 98056 9425200080/LOlPOOl 6 PAULSEN ROGER A 15657 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98055 1457500085/L01P0016 PLATT DA V!D+GEORGIA 510 E PANORAMIC DR CAMANO ISLAND WA 98292 1423059101/LOlPOOl 6 POAGUE JOHN+GEORGIA 15111 SE 43RD ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 .9112/L01P0016 MILERA TH DON D 15624 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 2006000220/L01P0016 MOELLER STEVEN R 10836 CRESTWOOD DRS SEATTLE WA 98178 9425200070/LOIP0016 MURAY AMA PEGGY 15649 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98056 2006000210/L01P0016 NASS LEROY 15713 SE 128TH · RENTON WA 98056 3664500127/LOIP0016 NOTTDALEH 13422 158TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500270/LOIP0016 OSGOODBY ALAN G 13527 158TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500279/L01P0016 OSGOOD BY JR BRUCE S 13523 158TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500260/L01P0016 PERRY LUCILLE M 13426 156TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98056 2006000180/L01P0016 PLATZERIND 14627 160TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 SD 13/LO 1 POO 16 R. STRACKE, FACILITIES & PLANNING RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT #403 1220 N 4TH ST RENTON WA 98055 ~059043/L01P0016 MILERA TH DON D 15624 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98055 2006000010/L01P0016 MUHICH STEVEN C+PERI A 13420 160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 9425200060/L01P0016 MURAY AMA PEGGY H 15649 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1423059058/L01P0016 NICHOLS MARKE & BARBARA A 13815160THAVESE RENTON WA 98059 3664500120/LOIP0016 NOTT FLORENCE 15915 SE 134TH PL RENTON WA 98059 3664500281/L01POOl6 OSGOODBY BRUCE SHANNON 13456 156TH SE RENTON WA 98055 1457500086/L01POOl6 PAPP AS LONNIE S 16009 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 3664500261/LO lPOOl 6 PERRY LUCILLE M 13426 156 A VE SE RENTON WA 98055 3664500141/L01P0016 PLATZ GUY E ET AL 13535 160TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000130/LOlPOOl 6 ROBERTSON GORDON R+SULTANA 16032 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 1457500097/LO!P0016 ROHRER JIM+SHEILA 21914 N ACULPCO DR SUN CITY WEST AZ 85375 SD8/L01P0016 STEVE CRAWFORD, NEW CONSTRUCTION ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT #411 565 NW HOLLY ST ISSAQUAH WA 98027 7418000080/LO!P0016 THORBECK DA VE 15650 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1423059027/L01P0016 WILLOUGHBY WADE V+NANCY 15612 SE 139TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1457500088/L01P0016 WOLBERG ALVIN & DIANE 16021 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 ~418000010/LO lPOO 16 ~PENCER DA YID LEE 13806 156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000170/L01P0016 STREIT PEGGY ANN 13512160THAVESE RENTON WA 98055 7418000060/L01P0016 TRUSTY LARRY & CINDY 15640 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1457500101/L01P0016 WILMOT ROBERT C+CAROL LYNN 13900 160TH SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500131/L01P0016 WOOD AL VIN R+WENDY S 13403 160TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 ...... ,, 423059088/L01P0016 ,• --, STACHOWIAK CR 15652 SE 139TH PLACE RENTON WA 98055 2006000290/L01P0016 SULTLINDAR 16022 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 7418000120/L01P0016 WALTER DAVID M+SHARI D 15635 SE 138TH PL RENTON WA 98059 3664500132/L01P0016 WILSON GARY H+VICKIE LEE 13411 160TH SE RENTON WA 98056 146340004 7 /LO 1 POOl 6 ZOLD KEVIN J+DOROTHY L 13615 156TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 • . ( ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 EVENDELL REZONE & PLAT-L01P0016 & L01TY401 DDES Project Name/Number I,,_L/.'.---"J-'--','e-"'h'"'"'"'J.r"'L=-~.I~. _g.="~M~-'N'-'--"O ___ , hereby affirm that I have posted the following: (print name) !ID Notice of Permit Application Other _____________________ _ 3 t:.,.d On the day of C)?7V,&1:.,,g_ , 2001, in accordance with the Department of Development and Environmental Services' requirements. I further affirm that the notice will remain in place and visible during the full required notice period. Notice was provided at the following location(s): ~IZAVC.L o~·v~w,..y. I) 2) 3) Ar Aff'«>'· M;l2&,,:_,r I hereby affirm that the above is a true and correct statement. ~L~r.£._ Signature This affidavit must be completed and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days of posting. Improper posting or failure to return the affidavit within 7 days shall be cause for the final decision regarding your permit to be postponed. Exhibit No. --::-'/""'_p ___ _ Item Nq. L~ H'ClO/ lo ..,.. l~ l'T'/.LJC!.) Received 3 -1,, ,-C0 MAIN FILE COPY CPSFORMS/AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING.DOC 7~9,lfoCOunty Hearing Examiner @ King County ~~~~ Department of'Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 King CountY Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 93055-1219 -----. ~ ~ [E O~T ~} :Zc1[E ~ K.C. D.D.E.S. CPLl\l/l?M ... '*, ! . I ' ' Number of sign ·boards required: Location of sign boards: Formal Plats A. Cities within 1 mile to be notified: B. Airports within 2 miles to be notified: ---------------- Mail Notice to: 1) Affected Tribes • 2) Applicant 3) Community Groups * 4) DOT, if adjoins State highway 5) City ( ) with a utility which is intended to serve the site. * Always included as a notice recipient (off of the STR list). Planners Posting Board lnstrx.doc ~\ f -'"'I. ®,• ' . I. ' NnTICE BOARuiiREQUIREMENTS~ i NOTICE OF APPLICATION King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1212 Per King County Code Section 20.20.060, a notice board must be prepared and posted for your land use application. Please prepare and post in the following manner: Notice Board Size and Text Specifications The notice board shall be constructed to the specifications described below. The notice board shall display the information shown in the figure. · Board Construction: The notice board shall be constructed with 4' x 4' plywood. Professionally prepared plastic notice board overlays, permanently affixed to the board are permissible. Notice boards may be reused but they must be clean and show no evidence of former wording. 1. Lettering style: Helvetica or similar standard typeface 2. Lettering size: Title should be 3" capital letters (NOTICE OF PROPOSED LAND USE ACTION). Other letters should be 2" letters except on the 8%" x 14" laminated paper providing the details of the proposal. See illustration below for use of capital and lower case letters, and placement of laminated paper and vinyl jacket. 3. Lettering: Black (permanent ink or silk-screen) 4. Background Color: White 5. Logo: King County emblem, in black 6. Laminated Notice of Application on a legal size sheet which provides information regarding the proposed land use application. TO BE SUPPLIED BY Land Use Services Division (LUSD) ( see enclosed). 7. Legal size waterproof vinyl jackets with a fold flap, and wrap string. TO BE SUPPLIED BY LUSD (see enclosed). The applicant must make copies of the Notice, place them in the vinyl jacket, and maintain a supply of copies throughout the posting period. ® NOTICE OF PROPOSED lAND USE ACTION 4 FT King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Call (206) 296-6600 Type of Action: Proposal: File No.: LUSD/Forms/LUSD Forms Public/Notice Board Requirements-NOA Updated 8/9/01 NOTICE OF APPLICATION 8.5" X 14" LAMINATEO 4 FT EXAMPLE I COPIES OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION IN VINYL JACKET Mf,IN FILE COPY l' fYl~ (i) fu/oi ,m /!· 5/a/lS~('Pg 1 l -. • ',-, ':, Jti(>., " ,' ., i '". ·1,: 'I ,:, ,: '" .. I ·,.i, ,', •. , .: 'I ' ' ' I ' ' 1 • ".".' ' ,., j' ',:_ • .-' ''. ' ,.Standards for t:ocatin'' 11 an'd 1 ln'stallin I 1 Notice'1Bo~fd:'_ -, ' ·. , , "· ,... •1• .1 ,,,1111r.,r'_,":w,: ,,,,, , .. ,,,.-r,,,_Q_,,,,,,,,,,,,1,,.,,,1, .. ,, ,1 r ,11,1-,• -1 .+9, 1,1-· .• ,,111-_-1,,r._,.,.,,•·,, ,·1• .,1 --_, ' :, ' ' •, ' , ,I' ' ' i I ,, •· . , ', , J'' ; '"'' ' , ' , 'I ' , , Vi I • I' I ' ' · , , ' i,' , II The notice board shall be located and installed to the specifications described below. Number of Notice Boards required for this application: TWO Special Instructions: LOCATION OF POSTING BOARDS WILL BE: ONE SIGN AT SE 136TH STREET AND ONE SIGN AT 160TH AVENUE SE Notice board shall be located: • • Midpoint on the site street frontage or as otherwise directed by LUSD staff to maximize visibility . At a location 5 feet inside from the street property line; a notice board structurally attached to an existing building shall be exempt from the setback provisions, provided that no notice board is located not more than 5 feet from the property line without approval from LUSD staff. • So that the top of the notice board is between 7 to 9 feet above grade . • So that it is easily accessible and totally visible to pedestrians . The applicant shall erect the notice board by solidly setting the post 12 to 18 inches into the ground; or structurally attached it to an existing building. Two 4" x 4" 8-foot-long (minimum) posts and four washers, bolts and nuts (3/8-inch diameter and bolts are 5-inches long) shall be used to install the notice board. Installation Certification The notice board(s) must be installed within 14 days after Land Use Services Division has determined that the application is complete. The enclosed "Affidavit of Posting" must be signed, and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days following the date of posting. Maintenance and Removal of the Notice Board The applicant shall maintain the notice board in good condition throughout the application review period, which shall extend through the time of the final county decision on the proposal and the expiration of any applicable appeal periods. If the notice board is removed, LUSD review of the land use application may be discontinued until the notice board is replaced and has remained in place for the required period of time. TO BE FILLED OUT BY LUSD STAFF ===========================================================----====--------- NOTICE BOARD TEXT INFORMATION (To Be Given to the Sign Painter) Type of Action: FORMAL PLAT & REZONE Proposal: REZONE PROPERTY AND DIVIDE SITE INTO 75 LOTS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES File No.: L01P0016 & L01TY401 NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 206-296-6600 (voice) or for hearing impaired 206-296-7217 (TTY). LUSD/Fonns/LUSD Forms Public/Notice Board Requirements-NOA Updated 8/9/0 l Pg 2 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 October 30, 2003 Notice Board & Posting Procedures Instruction Package Notice of Application In accordance with King County Code Section 20.20.060, enclosed you will find instructions, specifications, and materials in order to meet the notice of application posting requirements of the County. Please read these instructions carefully and take action quickly to order your notice board sign. Your notice b<:Jard sign can be ordered through a sign painter, using the information supplied on page 2 of the enclosed "Notice Board Requirements." The cost of the sign is the responsibility of the applicant. Further processing of your application is dependent upon fulfilling the notice of application posting requirement. ' When your sign is in place, attach the colored laminated notice of application along with the plastic envelope ( containing extra copies of the notice of application) to the notice board as depicted on page 1 of the instructions. Maintain a supply of notices within the plastic envelope throughout the comment period. The posting sign/notice board must remain in place throughout the duration of your application. Immediately upon completion of the above instructions, complete the enclosed affidavit of posting and return to the Department of Development and Environmental Services, Land Use Division, Current Planning Section. at the address shown above (envelope enclosed). Failure to comply with posting requirements may be cause for a delay in the processing of your application. If you have any questions, please call the Land Use Services Division at (206) 296-6600. Enclosures: Notice Board Requirements-Application Laminated Notice of Application Waterproof Vinyl Envelope containing copies of the Notice of Application Affidavit of Notice of Application Posting forrn/LUSD return envelope Noiice Board & Posting Procedures Instruction Pkg.-NOA 8/8/01 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services ',j,.t,,,·:····ri ··1:·:,:1":·,·:' .. ·· .. ·,,·,.0F···, 11,;,, ., .,, ··:·:,:1;, ·;;r Land Use Services Division 1.;' ,':;1 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 L03RE038 -Evendell Plat Revision DDES Project Number '''I 1"\•ti ' 1 'PbSTING ,,, . ·!,-·,,.',,·' ,1 .. · ,' !, ______________ ,, hereby affirm that I have posted the following: {print name) X Notice of Permit Application D Other-------------- on the day of , 2003, in accordance with the Department of Development and Environmental Services' requirements. I further affirm that the notice will remain in place and visible during the full required notice period. Notice was provided at the following location(s): I) 3) I hereby affirm that the above is a true and correct statement. Signature This affidavit must be completed and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days of posting. Improper posting or failure to return the affidavit within 7 days shall be cause for the final decision regarding your permit to be postponed. CPSFORMS/AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING.DOC 7/27/99 \ NOTICE BOAftb ff'EQUIREMENTSa NOTICE OF APPLICATION King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1212 Per King County Code Section 20.20.060, a notice board must be prepared and posted for your land use application. Please prepare and post in the following manner: Notice Board Size and Text Specifications The notice board shall be constructed to the specifications described below. The notice board shall display the information shown in the figure. Board Construction: The notice board shall be constructed with 4' x 4' plywood. Professionally prepared plastic notice board overlays, permanently affixed to the board are permissible. Notice boards may be reused but they must be clean and show no evidence of former wording. 1. Lettering style: Helvetica or similar standard typeface 2. Lettering size: Title should be 3" capital letters (NOTICE OF PROPOSED LAND USE ACTION). Other letters should be 2" letters except on the 81/," x 14" laminated paper providing the details of the proposal. See illustration below for use of capital and lower case letters, and placement of laminated paper and vinyl jacket. 3. Lettering: Black (permanent ink or silk-screen) 4. Background Color: White 5. Logo: King County emblem, in black 6. Laminated Notice of Application on a legal size sheet which provides information regarding the proposed land use application. TO BE SUPPLIED BY Land Use Services Division (LUSD) (see enclosed). 7. Legal size waterproof vinyl jackets with a fold flap, and wrap string. TO BE SUPPLIED BY LUSD (see enclosed). The applicant must make copies of the Notice, place them in the vinyl jacket, and maintain a supply of copies throughout the posting period. 4 FT ® NOTICE OF PROPOSED II.AND USE ACTION King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Call (206) 296-6600 Type of Action: Proposal: File No.: NOTICE OF APPLICATION 8.5" X 14" LAMINATED 4 FT EXAMPLE COPIES OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION IN VINYL JACKET Notice Board Requirements-NOA 8/8/01 Pg 1 The notice board shall be located and installed to the specifications described below. Number of Notice Boards required for this application: TWO Special Instructions: ___________________________ _ Notice board shall be located: Along 156'" Ave SE & 160'" Ave SE • • Midpoint on the site street frontage or as otherwise directed by LUSD staff to maximize visibility . At a location 5 feet inside from the street property line; a notice board structurally attached to an existing building shall be exempt from the setback provisions, provided that no notice board is located not more than 5 feet from the property line without approval from LUSD staff. • So that the top of the notice board is between 7 to 9 feet above grade . • So that it is easily accessible and totally visible to pedestrians . The applicant shall erect the notice board by solidly setting the post 12 to 18 inches into the ground; or structurally attached it to an existing building. Two 4" x 4" 8-foot-long (minimum) posts and four washers, bolts and nuts (3/8-inch diameter and bolts are 5-inches long) shall be used to install the notice board. Installation Certification The notice board(s) must be installed within 14 days after Land Use Services Division has determined that the application is complete. The enclosed "Affidavit of Posting" must be signed, and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days following the date of posting. Maintenance and Removal of the Notice Board The applicant shall maintain the notice board in good condition throughout the application review period, which shall extend through the time of the final county decision on the proposal and the expiration of any applicable appeal periods. If the notice board is removed, LUSD review of the land use application may be discontinued until the notice board is replaced and has remained in place for the required period of time. TO BE FILLED OUT BY LUSD STAFF =============================-=======--=======--====--------------------===- NOTICE BOARD TEXT INFORMATION (To Be Given to the Sign Painter) Type of Action: Formal Subdivision Revision Proposal: Subdivide into 70 lots for detached single-family residences using Density Credit Transfers to allow for 20 of the 70 lots. File No.: L03RE038 Evendell Plat Major Revision , NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 206-296-6600 (voice) orfor hearing impaired 206-296-7217. Notice Board Requirements-NOA 8/8/01 Pg 2 Rogers, Carol From: Scharer, Karen Sent: To: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 1 :31 PM Rogers, Carol Cc: Claussen, Kimberly Subject: L03RE038 Evendell 103re038SN0A.doc Carol -attached is the NOA revised to include our NOR&PH This will need to go to the 500' radius & POR's for Evendell -L01P0016 Also I have the SEPA Adoption notice ready for Greg's signature. Please send this documeni out to the PO R's also. I have scheduled the tech mtg & will that you route the information packaged. Questions??? See me. Oh -signboards on 156th Ave & 160th Ave. on the property frontage. Karen J. Scharer, Program/Project Manager II Current Planning Section Land Use Services. Division, DOES 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 206-296-7114 Fax 206-296-7051 1 ... . ' ' ... ' ...... , .. ® Department of Development and Environmental Setvices Land Use Services Dlvblon 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 980S5-1219 -.,~ ' ,, .. . . ·1· •. " ' ) Rational The Director or his designee may waive the requirement for a pre-application conference if it is determined to be unnecessary for review of an application. PLEASE PRINT ALL INFORMATION BELOW. Date: __ ~_. _/~z._i __ /_o_o __ King County Activity Number: __ .,,,,L"--='D_,O"'-'-f_O.:::......:.l_lc_~ 1 t In Permit type: ___ je.:_e._Z._c:1Y\..L ____ """'(~i'JY'_1)_\c:,_t-_________ _ Project Name: _ _,_N"--'~'1----"'b'-'-'\(J"'---)'V'}'--'----'------------------ Site Address: _______________________ _ . Parcelnumber(s): , IL\Z.30S' -C/ODq Applicant's Name: Applicant's rational for waiver: Based on the rational noted above, I agree to waive the required pre- application conference, which has been determined to be unnecessary for filing for an application . ..,,f7,, Mark Car~tand Use Services Division Manager F96/ SPRS/ Rational. W11.v 4/15/9?-B:~2 AM/dj White: File MAIN FILE COPY Canary: Mark Cary !'!c!!',, Applicant @ King County Department of De I j MIE:i tt and Environmental Services Land Use 5eM:es DMsion 900 Oa+-esdafe Avenue SW PLAT DENSITY All' DIMENSION CALCULAl ,uNS !I Renton. WA98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 PRELIMINARY SUBOMSION WORKSHEET RELATING TO DENSITY AND DIMENSIONS A great many ordinances play a rc:Me in the creation ct a ~ wtlhin King County. Determining the alkMable density. maaimum density. minimum density. and lot widdl on a pM!C'I? ot property can be confusing. This 'tN'Ofksheet will assist you in correctly applying spec;& portions of the code and will be used to determine if a proposed plat or short plat meets the density and dimensk>ns prOYisions ol the King County Zoning Code (TlUe 21 A). This worksheet is prepared to assist aw'leants. and does nol replace comP'iance wtth adopted local. state and federal laws. Preappication conferences are recommended. These conferences ~P to clarify issues and ans'Wef questions. They may save you both time and money by eitmtnabng delays resulting from requests for additional information and revisions. You may call (206) 296-6640 to find out how to arrange for a Pfeappltcatlon conference. DATE: 25-Mac..02 NAME OF PLAT: fYENDEll. FILE NO.: L01PQ016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Urban resfdmtia1/4-12 LJoits per Aae ZONIC':) COMM~R SUBAREA PLAN: ~l!im,1...,illk:lc If more than one ComPfehenslve Plan Land Use desagnation or zone classification exists for the property. show the boundafy between the Land uses or zones and the area W'tthin each on the pretlminary pt.at map. If a single lot is divided by a zone boundary. translening density across zones on that lot may be permitted suh;ect to the prOYisions of KCC 21A.12200. Ple,»1? comDE'le onty the applkah&.. pornons of the form I. Site Area (KC C 21A 06 1172)· Site area (in square feet) is the gross horizontal area ol the prOfecl site, m submefged lands as defined by K.C.C. 2 IA.06.1265. and ~areas which are required to be dedicated on the perime1er of a protect site for public rihgts-<>f+way. ___ _.:O:_ ___ square feet in submerged land (any land bek:Jw the ordinary high water mark • see K.C.C. 21A.06.825.) + ___ _.:O:_ ___ square feet in perimeter rights-of-way which will be required to be dedtcated (area 30 feet hom center line of road) ___ _s.o ___ To<al Calculation: II. 496,355 Gross horizontal area of the proied site ----~00 Total submefged lands and rights-of-way 496,355 5,,a,e area in square feet NOTE: To continue calculations. convert site area In square feet to acres by dMding by 43.560 11.39 Site area in acres ----- Base Density (K.C.C. 21A.12.D30 -.040 tab!es): The base density is determined by the zone designation(s) for the lot. '& ,q 25-Ma,-02 Page 1 of4 4 du/acre n {') () :=..; {/j _:?; :::, !,,; ,-._1 ·-' 0 ·, ( C, ' ,< 1 <--, ' ~u· ~ • J () ' PLAT DENSIT'( AND Dl~ENSION CALCULATIONS Ill. , BAYod:o2 (KC C 21A 12 070)· The base number of dwetltng units is calculated by muttiPMng the site area by the base density in dwelling units per acre (from K.C.C. 21A.12.030-.040ta~). 11.39 site area in acres {see Section L) X 4 base-(seeSectloo II.). = 45.58 aMowable dwelling units When cak:u~ result in a fraction, the fraction is rounded to the nearest 'Nho'e number as folJows: 1 . Fractions of .50 or al::lc>Ye shaU be rounded up: and 2. Fractions be4ow .50 shall be rounded do\.vn. IV. Beww:ed Qn..site Bea:eation 5oace (KC C ZIA 14 180)· Thts section must be com~ed only if the proposal is a residential de"i elopment of more than four dviletUng units in the UR and A zones. stand-ak>oe tCNlll"lhou5es in the NB zone on Pfoperly designaled Commercial OJts.ide of Cenlef if more than four units. or any mixed use deo lcµ1.e11f. it mofe than four units. Recreation space must be computed by muttiP¥ng the recreation space requirement per unit type by the Pfoposed number at such dwetling units (K.C.C. 21 A.14. 180). NOTE: King County has the discretion to accept a fee in Ueu ol all or a poftion of the required recreation spact> per K.C.C. 21A.14.185. Apartmenb.and 10'\llfflhouses developed at a density greater than etght units per acre. and mixed use must prov;de recreational space as foUo•,,'5: 90 square feet X ______ proposed number of studio and one bedroom uni _____________ --".o 130 square feet X 170 square feet X _____ proposed number of t'NO bedroom units 0 ______ Pfoposed number of three Of fflOfe bedroom unit! _____________ _,,_o ------Recreation Space Requirement 0 Residential subdMsk>ns and townhouses developed at a density of eight units or less per acre must p,CMde recreational space as folkJws: 390 square feet X _____ 46:.::.proposed number of units Mobi~ home parks shall provde recreational space as foilows: 260 square feet X ______ Pfoposed number of units = V. Net Roifr1abte Area fK CC 21 A 06 79D· Tors section rs used tor computing minimum density and must be competed onty if the site is located in the R-4 through R-48 7.ones and designated Urban by the King County Comprehenstve Plan. The net buildable area is the site area (see Section I.) less the foilow'ing areas: + + + + + 0 ____ .::... ____ areas dJin.a project site which are required to be dedicated fOf public rights-of-way in excess of sixty feet (60') of 'lilidth 65.700 ---===---sensltille areas and their buffers. to the extent they are required by King County to remain undeveloped 35.740 __ _.:::::.ce.:::::._ ___ areas required fOf above ground stormwater control facilities including. but not limited to. retention/detention ponds, 'biofittration swales and setbacks from such ponds and $wales ----"'='----areas required by King County to be dedk:ated Of reserved as on-site recreation areas. Deduct 6.227 area wtthtn stormwatef controi facillty If requesting recreation space credit as allowed by KCC 21A. 14.180. (see Section IV.) 0 ___ ..:,. ___ regional utility corridors. and 0 ____ .::._ ____ octlef areas. excluding setbacks. required by King County to remain undeveloped 107.667 ==.:..... __ Total reductions Calculation, 17940 0 496.355 de area in square feet (see Section I.) ---c1,c0:-7 ,,,:66;7,..Total reductions = 388.688 net bu~ area in square feet NOTE: convert site area In square feel to acres by dtviding by 43.560 8.92 net ~ area In acres PLAT DENSITY AND DIMENSION CALCULATIONS VI. 1ne minimum density requirement applies QON to the R--4 through R....a zooes. Minimum demity is determined by multiplying the base density in ct#elling units pet' acre (see Section II.) by the net buildab6e area of the site in acres (see Section V.) and then mullipiying the reslUbng product by the minimum density percentage from the K.C.C. 21 A.12.030 tabk!. The minimum density reQ™remenb may be phased or waived by King County in certain cases. See K.C.C. 21A.12.060. Calculation' ____ 4_base deo:$tty in dU/ac (see Section IL 8.92 net bulkiabk! area in acres (see Section V.) VII. ------~357'.6797 X minimum density% set forth in K.C.C. 21 A.12.030 Of as adjusted in Section Vil. _______ 30_.34_minimum d-Nelling units required t;&,imtJln Peosity: Adi! estmeots foe M:xteratc Sfore:s CK C C 21 A J 2 087) Residential de elc.t,Aoo,.ts in the R-4. R-6 and R-8 2ones may modify the minimum dens.fy factor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 based on the we;ghted aYefa9e slope of the net build,able area of the site (see Section V.). To determine the weighted average slope. a topographic survey is required to calculate the net buUdable area(s) within each of the following slope increments and then muttiptying the numbef of square feet In each sk>pe Increment by the median sk>pe value of each slope increment as follov,r.;: --------'00 sq. ft O -5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value + O sq 11 5-10~~ slope inoementX i.5% mediM slopeve.lue + O sq. II 10-1 S~~ slope 1naementX 12.5% medion slope value + 0 sq N 15-20% slope incrementX 17.5% medion slopevolue + · 0 sq N 20-25% slope 1ncremen1x 22.5% medion slope value + 0 sq N 25-30% slope inC1ement>-: 27 5% median slopevelue + 0 sq II JO -JS!.o slope incremen1 X 32 5% med,on slope value + a sq " 35-40~~ slope inC1ementX 37 S~• median slope value --------'00 Total square feet in net buikiat:Me area -------'O_Total square feet adjusted for slope Calculation: ---~0'-total square feet adjusted for slope dMded by ....,,.,.-,.,....--0'-total square feet in net buildable area ________ 'Netghled average slope of net buUdable area ---------% (Note: mumply by 100 to cOl"IYet't to percent -round up to nearest whole percent) Use the tabk! bek,w to determine the minimum density factor. This density is substituted for the minimum den~ factor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table when cak:u&ating the minimum densfty as shc:MTt in Section VI. of this WOfkshfft. Wetghted Average Slope of Net Minimum Densny Factof: Buiklable .Area(s) of Site: 0% -less than 5% 85.00% 5% -less than 15% 83%, less 1.S% for each 1 % of aYef ......... i.....-in excess of 5% 1S% -less than 40% 66%. less 2.0% for each 1% of aver-~ in exte$S of 15% EXAMPLE CALCULATION FOR MINIMUM DENSITY ADJUSTIAENTS FOR MODERATE SLOPES, ________ sq. ft O -5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value + 10000 sq. tt 5-10'7. slope inC1ementX 7 5% mediM slopevelue + 20000 sq n 10-15% slope inoementX 12.5% med,on slope value + sq, 11 15-20% slope inoemen1X 17.5% median slope value + sq. tt 20-25% slope ,noementX 22.5% median slopevelue + sq n 25-30% slope inoementX 27 5% median slope value + sq. N 30-35% slope inoementX 32.5% median slope vclue + sq tt 35-40% slope ,ncrementX 37.5~~ median slope value -----~300~_0_0 Total squafe feet innet~area Cakulation: ____ 3250 __ Total square feet adjusted tor sk>pe ---==-total square feet adjusted for slope dMded by total square feet in net bulkiable area ------~o~. 1~1 vrteighted ~ :s.lope of net buildal:Me area -------''~'%.cc% (Note: m~ by 100 to convert to percent-round upto nearest whole percent) Using the tab'e aboYe. an 11% weighled average sloped net buildable area faUs within the 5% -less than 15% range whkh has a mlntmum density factor cl 83%, less 1.5% tor each 1% of~ 5k,pe in exce$S of 5%. Smee 11% ts 6% aboYe 5%. multiply 6 times 1.5 whkh would equal 9%. Subtract 9% from 83% for an adjusted minimum denstty factor of 74%. This replaces the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21 A.12.030 tabk?. 25-Mar-02 Page 3 of 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 2500 ·' PLAT DENSITY AND DIMENSION -:ULATIONS VIII. Haxirnurn C r· d1 Units Mrw:d fK C C 21 A 12 030 040) · This section shoukt be completed only it the proposaf includes apP'ication of resklential density incentives (K.C.C. 21 A.34) or transfer of density credit {K.C.C. 21 A.36 or 21A.55). Maximum density is cak:uLated by adding the bonus or transfer units authorized to the base units cak:uWed in Section Ill. of this WOt'ksheet. The maximum density permitted through residential density incentives is 1 SO percent of the base density (see Section II.) of the underlying zoning of the de lcµ:11E11t or 200 percent of the base density for proposals \Nlth 100 percent afforda~ units. The maximum density pemiitted through transfer of density credit is 150 percent of the base density (see Section II.) of the underlying zoning of the Mclopme,,t. ---~O base density In dwelling units per acre (see Section II.) X 150% O maximum density -~---'O~ maximum density in ~ng units per acre X 11.3947429 site area in acr~·--------------=-0 maximum chrr,,effing units alkJwed utiluwlg density incentiYes (K.C.C. 21 A.34) ---~Oc-base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section 11.) X 200% 0 maximum density --c--0,-maximum density in dwelling units per acre X 11.39 site area in acr~,-c-,,-------------0~ maximum ~ling units alkY-Ned utilizing density incentives with 100% affordabk! units (K.C.C. 21A.34) ---~Oc-base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section II.) X 150% 0 maximum density 0 maximum density in ct.v,e4ling units per acre X 11 .3947429 site area in ac:r~ 0 --,---,------------maximum d-NeHing units aUovr.<ed utilizing density transfers (K.C.C. 21A.36 or 21A.55) Cakulation: ________ o base atlowab6e dwelling units cak:ulated in Sectk>n Ill. + 0 tx>nus units authorized by K.C.C. 21A.34 • _______ 7 0 transfer units authorized by K.C.C. 21 A.36 or 21 A.55 ________ o_total dwelling units (cannot exceed maximums calculated aboYe) IX. Minimum Lot Area For Constructioo: X. 25-M-<-02 Page 4 ol 4 Except as proYided for nono:>ntormances in KCC 21A.32: A. B. lnt Width· ln the UR and R zones no constructiOn shall be permitted on a lot that contains an area of less than 2.500 square feet or that does not comply with the appHcable minimum lot width, except for !°""""house de-eloptnents or zero-lot-line subdivisions: and In the A. F. or RA zones· 1. Construction shajl not be pennitted on a lot containing less than 5,000 square feet: and 2. Constructioo shaM be limited to one ctvr,,effing unit and residential accessory uses tor lots containing grealef than 5.000 square feet, but less than 12,500 square feet. (KCC 21 A.12.100) Loi widths shall be measured by scajing a clrc~ of the apphcable diameter within the boundaries of the lot as shown bekiw. prOYided that an access easement shall not be included within the circle. (See KCC 21 A.12.050). !I King Counly Dep,artn,ent of De\ I , , e.11 and Environmental Services Land Use 5eMa:s DMsion 900 Oalresda+e A'l/eflue SW --WA98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 PLAT DENSITY~ DIMENSION CALCULA·, ,.,NS PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISKlN WORKSHEET RELATING TO DENSITY AND DIMENSIONS A great many ordinances play a ro6e in the er~ of a subdlYi:sion within King County. Detennining the allc::Hlab6e dern;,;ty. maaimum density, minimum density, and lot wdh on a j:*!Ce of property can be confusing. This woritsheet wiU assist you in COtTectly applying specific po,tions of the code and will be used to determine if a proposed plat or short plat meets the density and dimemioos prc:Jlfflions of the King County Zoning Code (Tl& 21 A). This WOfksheet is prepared to assist applk:ants. and does not replace compffance with adopted local, Slate and federal laws. Pre~icalion confefeoces are recomme..ded. These conferences he4p to clarify issue$ and an5'!lrl'ef questions. They may saw you both time and money by e+tminating detays resulting from requests for additional informabon and revisk:>ns. You may call (206) 296-6640 to find out how to arrange for a preappllcation conference. DATE: NAME OF PLAT: EYFNOEll. FILE NO.: L D1eoo16 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Urban res&otiaf/4-12 Units per Aa:e ZONING: R-6 (f'mpr;ed) COMMUNITY OR SUBAREA PLAN: t!e astle If moJe than one Comp,"ehensNe ~ Land Use ~ or zone cLassification exists for the property, show the boundary betNeet'l the land ~ or zones and the area wtthin each on the preliminary pW map. It a 5ingte lot Is divided by a zone boundary, translerring density across zones on that lot may be petmrtted subject to the prOYisions of KCC 21A.12.200. ~a;,;e c~ly the aPQ/:irahfe portions al the tonn I. Site Acea {KC C 21A.06 1172)· Site area (in square feet) is the gross horizontal area of the project site. ffl submerged lands as defined by K.C.C. 2 IA.06.1265. and ffl_.areas 'llrl"hich are r@qU«ed to be dedicated on the perimeter of a project site for pubOc rihgts-ol-way. -----=o ___ square feet in submefged land (any land below the ordinary htgh wateJ mark -see K.C.C. 21A.06.825.) + __ _,2"4",B0"7'---square feet in perimetef rights-of-way which will be required to be dedicated (area 30 feet from center line of road) Calculation: II. 24,807 Total 566.239 Gross~ are.a of the project site 24,807 Total 5Ubmetged lands and rights-of-way 541.432 Sile are.a In square feet NOTE: To continue cak:ulations, convert site are.a in square feet to acres by dividing by 43.560 ___ 1~2._43_ Sile .are.a in acres Base Density (K.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.040 tab!es): The base densi1y;,; determined by the zone designation{s) for the lot 25-Ma<-02 Page 1 of4 6 du/acre I! C!J ,-., .~· -, •, !!J .\ i-.J ',; ~ . .., .. 0 .1 C.' ~ (1 .; ' ., l ::::: -1 ~E} 0 , PLAT DENSITY AND DIMENSION CALCULATIONS Ill. , Bovodfo2 CK CC ZIA 12 0701· The base number of ctweling units is ca6cu&aled by multipfytng the site area by the base density in dweffing units per acre (from K.C.C. 21A.12.0JO-.040~). 12.43 site area in acres (see Section I.) X 6 base -(see Section II.) = 74.58 aUowabk! d\NoelJing units When cak:ulations result in a fraction. the fraction is rounded to the nearest~ number as folkwir.;: 1. Fractions of .50 Of abcwe shall be rounded up: and 2. Fractions bek,w .50 sh.NI be rounded down. IV. Beo,MCOO On-site Bn:zeatioo 5racr CK CC 21A 14 180)· Tots section must be comP'eted only if the proposal is a residential dPI -elopm,cnt of more than four d'N'etting units in the UR and A zones. stand-ak>ne townhouses in the NB zone on property destgnated Commercial Outside of Center if fflOf'e than lour units. o, any mixed use ~elopmeut it more than four units. Recreation space must be computed by multiP¥ng the recreation space requirement per unit type by the proposed number of such <fo#elling units (K.C.C. 21 A.14. 180). NOTE: King County has the discretion lo accept a fee in lteU of aJI Of a port>on of the required recreation space per K.C.C. 21A.14.185. Apartments and townhouses deYek>ped at a density gtealer than eight units per acre. and mixed use must prcwide recreational space as loUc:>"NS: 90 square feet X 130 square feet X 170 square feet X ______ proposed numbef of studio and one bedroom uni ______________ o=- ______ proposed number of two bedroom untts O ______ p,oposed number of three or more bedroom unre! ______________ o=- ______ Recreation Space Requirement O Residential subdMsk>ns and tCM'flhouses deYek,ped at a density of eight unib or less per acre must prlJl\ltde recreational space as folkiws: 390 square feet X _____ 7_0_proposed number of units 27300 Mobik! home parks shall prlJl\oftde recreational space as fotlows: 260 square feet X _____ propo5ed numbef of units = V. Net &ik1abte Area fK CC 21A 06 J9D· This section is used tor computing minimum density and must be completed only if the site is located in the R-4 through R-48 zones and designated Urban by the King County Comprehens.#Ye Plan. The net buildab&e area is the 500 area (see Section I.) less the folkJwing areas· 0 -----'-----areas ~a prqect site which are required to be dedicated for pu~ic rights-of-way in excess of sixty feet (60') of widd"I + 76.130 ---==:=..---sensitiYe areas and their buffers, to the extent they are required by King County to remain -+ 40.256 ----~----areas required for aboYe groond s.tormwater control facilities Including, but not limited to, reteooon/detention ~. bk,fittration swates and setbacks from such ponds and swales + 13.650 ---==:=..---areas required by K)flg County to be dedicated or reser,,ed as on-site recreation areas. Deduct area "w'ithin stormwater control facility if requesting recreation space credit as alk:,wed by KCC 21A.14.180. (see Section IV.) + 0 ------regk>nal utility corridors. and + 0 ____ .c.,. ____ other areas. excluding secbacks. required by King County to remain undevek>ped 130.036 Total reductions ------CalaJlation: 25-Ma,--02 Poge 2 014 541.451 site area in squa,e feet (see Section I.) ---;;130~,006=.=,~Total reductions 411.415 net build.able area in square feet NOTE; convert site area in square feet to acres by dividing by 43,560 9.44 net bulldab&e area in acres 0 -. PLAT DENSITY AND DIMENSION CALCULATIONS VI. "'i:th!n Urban en· htitb .. -nsity (KC C 21A 12 060) The minimum density requifement app6ies QDfy: to the R-4 through~ zor,es. Minimum density is determined by multiplying the base d,ens;ty in ~ling units pef acre (see Section II.) by the net buikiable area of the site in acres (see Section V.) and then multiplying the resulting pl'oduct by the minimum denSfty percentage from the K.C.C. 21 A.12.030 table. The minimum density requirements may be phased Of wa.....ed by King County in certain cases. See K.C.C. 21A.12.060. Calculation: ____ 6_base density in duJac (see Section ll. 9.44 net build.able area in acres (see Section V.) ------,567'.6-=-7 X minimum density% set forth in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 Of as adjusted in Section VII. ------~48~. 1~7-minimum <Nl'elling units required VII. MioimYCD Qeosity Adbastrneots for Mod-ate SkJoes (KC C 21A 12 ()fm Residential de'\elopments in the R-4. R--6 and R-8 zones may modify the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21 A.12.030 based on the weighted avefage slope at the net buik:iable area of the site (see Section V .) . To determine the weighted average slope. a topographic survey is required to cakulate the net bui~ area(s) within each of the following sk>pe increments and then multiptying the number ot square leet in each slope increment by the rn«?dian slope ViMue of each slope increment a:s follow5: ________ o sq. ft O -5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value + O SQ II 5-10% slope 1naemen1>,: i St~ medi!l.r1 slope value + 0 sq n 10-lS'Y. slope 1ncrementX 1 ~.5% median slopeve.lue + O sq fl 15-20% slope increment:'<. 1 i.5% med1e.n slope ve.lue + 0 SQ n 20-25% slope incrementX 22.S'!-'~ med1an slope volue + 0 SQ n 2S • 30~'<-slope incrementX 2i.5% median slope ve.lue + 0 sq n 30-35% slope 1ncrementX 32.5% medie.n slope ve.Jue + O sQ. n 35-~O~o slope inoemen1X Ji.5% median slope value _______ ..:0 0 Total 5quare feet in nee bwldable area ------'0-Total square feet adjusted '°' slope Calculation: ____ o_totat square feet adjusted for 5k>pe dMded by a total square feet in net buildable area _________ wetQhted average slope of net buikiab4e area _________ % (Note: multipty by 100 to convert to percent -round up to nearest 'Nho6e percent) Use the talMe below to determine the minimum density factor. This density is substituted tor the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21 A.12.030 tab6e when calculating the minimum density as shown in Section VI. of this worllsheet. Weighted AYefage Sk>pe of Net Minimum Densny Factor: ~ Area(!!) of Site: 0% -less than 5% 85.00% 5%-lessthan 15% 83%. less 1.5% for each 1 % of -o:i.--in excess of 5% 15% -less than 40% 66%. less 2.0% fof each 1 % of in excess of 15% EXAMPLE CALCULATION FOR MINIMUM DENSITY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MODERATE SLOPES: ------==~sq. ft O -5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value + 10000 sq n 5-10'!-o slope ,noemen1X 7.5~~ median slope value + 20000 sq n 10-15% slope inoementX 12.5% median slope value + sq. fl 1S • 20% slope inoementX 17.5% medie.n slope ve.Jue + sq. n 20-25% slope inoememx 22.5% median slope value + sq. ti 25-30% slope inoementX 27.5% median slope ve.Jue + sq n 30· 35% slope inoemen1X 32 S~~ median slopeve.lue + sq n 35-'10% slope inoementX 37.5% median slope ve.lue ------'30=0'-0'-0'-Total square feet in nee bui4dabJe area Calculation: -----'3250=.c.Totat square feet adjusted for slope __ ..:3250='-total square feet adttded tor slope divided by total square feet in net: buUdable area _______ o_. 1_1_-'9t*d average sk>pe of net buWdable area -------'\-'-\ %""-% (Note: muetipfy by 100 to conYert to percent -round up to nearest whole percent) Using the tabko atx:,,,,e, an 11 % weighted avetage slope of net boodable area falii! within the 5% -less than 15% range 'Nhich has a minimum density factor of 83%. less 1.5% for each 1% ot avef"ilQ8 $lope in exces5 ot 5%. Since 11 % is 6% above 5%. multiply 6 times 1.5 'Nhich 'NOUld equal 9%. Subtract 9% from 83% for an adjusted minimum den~ factor of 7 4 %. This r~es the minimum density factOf in K.C.C. 21 A.12.030 tab6e. 25-Mar-02 Page 3 of 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 2500 ' PLAT DENSfTY AND DIMENSION ";ULATIONS VIII. Hmrirnurn D H" ig Units Attm-d CK CC 21A 12 030 040)· This section shouk:I be completed only if the proposal Includes application ot residential density incentives (K.C.C. 21A.34) or translef ot density credit (K.C.C. 21 A.36 or 21A.55). Maximum density ts c.akulated by adding the bonus or transfer units authorized to the ba5e units calcu!aled in Section Ill. ot this WC>fbheet. The maximum density permitted through residential density incentives is 150 percent of the base dens,ity (see Section II.) of the underlying zoning of the de-.clcpc,,e,,t or 200 percent at the base dens.Icy for proposab with 100 percent atkwdable units. The maximum density pennitted through translef of density credit is 150 pet"cent of the base density (see Section II.) of the underlying zoning of the de-. elopmE!,, ,t. ____ Oc-bas.edens.ity in dwelling units pet' acre (see Section II.) X 150% 0 maximum density -~--O~maximum density in dwelling units per acre X 12.43 site area in acre! _____________ -=-0 maximum d'#elling unlt:S allowed utilizing density incentives (K.C.C. 21A.34)_ ----,0,.base density in dvteUing units per acre (see Section II.) X 200% 0 maximum density ____ O_maximum density in ct.ri,,effing units per acre X 12.43 site area in acre! ______________ o maximum dwelling units aUc:wr.•ed utNizing density incentives with 100% affordab6e units (K.C.C. 21A.34) ----,0,.basedensttyind'Ne41ingunitsperacre(seeSection11.) X 150% 0 maximum density 0 maximum density in dwelling units pet' acre X 12.43 site area in acre! O -max,-~·-m_u_m_dwel7 ling units allowed utilizing density transter.i. (K.C.C. 21A.36 Of 21 A.55) -------------- Cak:ulation: ________ O_base alk:Nirable dwelling units cak:ulated in Section Ill. + 0 bonus units authorized by K.C.C. 21A.34 + 0 transfer units authorized by K.C.C. 21A.36 Of 21 A.55. ________ o_total ctwetling units (c.annol: exceed maximums calculated aboYe) IX. Minimum Lot Area For Construction: Except as provided for nonconformances in KCC 21A.32: A. B In the UR and A zones no construction shalt be permitted on a lot that contains an area ot less than 2,500 square feet Of that doe$ not comply with the apfMicab6e minimum lot width. except fOf tO\NTlhouse d~elopmettts Of zero-kit-line subdMsions; and In the A, F, Of RA zones: 1. Construction shall not be permrtted on a lot containing less than 5.000 square feet: and 2. Construction shall be limited to one dwelling unrt and residential accessay uses IOI' lots containing greater than 5.000 square feet. but less than 12.500 square feet. (KCC 21A.12.100) X. lpt Wldttr 25-Mar-02 Page 4 of 4 Lot 'Nktths ~II be measured by scaling a circle of the applicabae diameter within the boundaries of the lot as shown boelc:M'. pn:JIVO!'d that an access e~ shall not be included within the cirde. (See KCC 21A.12.050). ... •, • King County 0£ ~artment of Dwelopment ond Environmental Services Le.nd Use SelVices Division 900 Oe.kesde.leAvenue SN Renton. WA 96055-1219 (206) 296-6600 PLAT DENSITY AND DIMENSION CALCULATIONS PRELIMINARY SUBOMSION WORKSHEET RElA1lNG TO DENSITY AND DIMENSIONS A. grHI many crdi11111ces play a role in the cr9aticn of a s11bdivision within King CQunty. Oelarrnining the .allowable dens11y, maaimum den1ity. minimum density. and lot widlh on a piece of property can be conf\lsing. Thia wol'Uheel will usisl you in a,rredly a.pplying specific: portions of the code and will be used IO determine if a propc,1ed pla1 er 1hor1 plat meats Iha density and dimensions provisions of 1he King O,unty Zoning Cod• (Title 21A). This worksheel is prepar..:1 to assist Apphc:ant:s. &nd does not replace ccmptianco with adopted local. si.i-and federal laws. Praappllcaticn c,gnferenc:es arw reccmmendad. These ccnferenc:es help to c:lanly issues and answar queshons. They may nve you bc:rth time and mcnay by eliminating delays resulting ln:im requasts for additional information and rwisions. 'T'1;111 may call (206) 296-6640 10 find out htJW to arr&nge for a prw;i,pplication conlerwnco. OA1E NAME OFP\.AT:EVENOELL COMPREHENSIVE PIAN LANO USE DESIGNATION ZONING: ~ COMMUNITY OR SUBAAEA Pl.AN: FllE NO: ______ _ Urhnn rftlidentinl/+J 2 Units per Acre It more than one CcmprwhensNe Plan Wd Use duignalion or mne clusification Dilts for the property, shc,wthe boundary ~nth a land use, gr zones and the area within eadi on tha prwliminary plat map. ti a single lot is divided by a zona boundary. ITansferring density ac:rou zones on that lat may be permitted subject ID the pro.'isions of KCC 21A.1Z.200 Plc.u, cpmpltto onlv !ht applicable portions otth, fgun S~e A,:eo CK CC 21A 061172)· Site area (in squa,e 1 .. 1) is the gross horiZl:lntal area of the projed sit•. !Ill submerged lands u defined by K.C.C. Z IA.06.1265. and lnl.areas whic:h are required IO be dedicated on th• perimeter of il projed site for public rihgts-of-way. ----''----square feet in submerged land (any land below tha ordina,y high water marll . sn K.C.C. ZlA.06.825.) ___ 1_1._48_2 ___ squarw feet in perimmr rights-of-way which will be required 10 be dedicated (area 30 Int from center line of road) ___ 1c1~.•-•~2 ___ Tota1 Calcule.tion: 4197. 150 Grass horiZl:lntal ilffl<I of the projed site ---'101.04802~Tatal submerged lands and rights-of-way 4185.668 Site area in squant /HI NOTE: To ccntinue calculations. ccrwert site area in square IHI IO acrn by dMding by 413,560 ___ 0110.015~ Sita area in acre• II. Base Density (K.C.C. 21Al2.030 • .O~O !ables): The base density is determined by the zone designation(s) for the lot. 3.JUl•Ol Paga 1 0141 ____ •c..... ___ du/aae fVB1tJ£ZL i?-"1" '1'-~1·v£" MAIN FILE COP'i ... P!tAT OENS11Y AND DIMENSION CALCULATIONS Ill. Allmwable Dwelling Units ond Boundio2 CK CC 21A 12 QZO)· Th• bu• numb•r of ctw.lling unil!I i1 ealeulilted by multiplying the site VH. byth• base density in dwtilling units per ii.er• (from K.C.C. 21A.12.030 • .040tablH), 11.15 sila &rH in .eras (see Section I.) X 4 ----. 4"4.60 ,1.llcw&t:lle dwtilling 11nits When ealcul~ons result in ii. !radian. the fradion is rounded to th• nea,astwhoi• number u follows· 1. FradlO!ls of .50 or abo¥a 11\all be rounded up: and 2. FrKtJons be!c:JW .50 stlall be rounded down. rv. Required On:11ite Becremion Scace {Kc c 21A 1:11 em· This s.-ction must be a:impleted only if the proposal is ii. rasidenh'ill dllY91Dpment of morw than /cur dwelling units in the UR and R zones. stand·alon• townhousH in the NB zone on_property design.atad Commercial Outside of Center ii mare than IDur units. or any mix.cl use d...,.lopment if mo,. than !Dur units. Reawiltion spKe musl be eompu1ad by multiplying lh• rac:niaticin spac:. requir•m•nt p•r uni1type by th• propCJS•d numb•r cit suc:h d-lling units {K.C.C. 21A.14. 180). NOTE: King Count)" hu lh• diseraticin 10 accept al•• in li•u of all cir a porticin Clfth• r•quirad racr•aticin spac:a per K.C.C. 21A.1•1.1a5. Apartments ii.lid IClwnhous9s d...,.lopltd al a d•nsi1y gr•at•r lhil.ll •ight unit,; p•r ac:re. ii.lid mix•d UH must provide racr.ationa.l spu:a il!I follows: 90 S(IUar•l..t X _____ proposltd number of studio ii.lid on• bltdroom units ----------------------"'" 130 square lfftX 170squar•f-lX _____ proposltd numbtlr ol two badroom units O _____ propoHd number olthra• or mora b•draom units 0 _____ R•creation Space Requir•m•nt O Residential s11bdivisicins and townhouses d..,_loped at a densily of eight units or less P•r ac:ra must provid• recreational spaee as follows: 390 s.quare feat X ____ 0 <~5 proposad number ol uniis = Mobile hom• parks shall provid• recr•il.licinil.l spaca u 1cillciws: 260 square fe•t X _____ pmposad number ol units = V. Net BuildahJe Amo a< CC ?JA 06 79D" This lad!Cln is usad for c;:omputing minimum density and must be ccmpl•tad only if the site is located in the R-4 lhrough R-48 mnas ii.lid design ii.lad Urban by the King Counly Comprehensr.,9 Plan. Th• n•t buildabl• area is th• sit. area (s- Secaon L} leu In• follDWing aniu: ___ _,O ____ aftlU Ylilhirl.• projed site whieh ara requirad 10 be dedicatltd for pub!ie rights-of-way in u.c:.u of sildy Ml (60') ol width ___ S_t"9_<_1 ___ sensitiwi arou and their butlers. to the axtent thay are requirltd by King County !Cl remain und-lci~ __ _,J_50.80J0S ___ aniu required for abQYtl ground s!ClrlTlWil.ter ecintrol lacilities ineluding. but no1 lim1tad to r919nticin/detenticin ponds. biofittration swil..lH and sett>ack:s from such ponds a.nd swales ___ 80.07705,_ ___ il.Alu required by King Coun1yto be dadicatad cir ras•rwd as on-site recreabon areas. Deduct ara• within stormwater ecintrol lacility ii requesting recraaticin space erad1t as allCIWld by KCC ZlA.14.180. (s-Section IV.) ___ ....,oc_ ___ ,agionil.l utilily ecirridors. and ___ _,o ____ oth•r ateu. ucluding setbacks. requirad by King Counly to ramain unditV,1lciped ___ 1 0 0 0 7_.5 0 5 0 1 ___ Tcital radudions Calcule.llon 3-Jyj.Ql Pig• Z of 4 485.668 site araa in 1quare fe•t (H• Section I.) ---e',°'a·'.'s'cTotlll raduc:llcins 378. 11 7 n•t buildable area in squar• fe•t NOTE: convan srte area 1n square 1 .. 1 to ac:ras by dividing by 43.560 8.68 n•t buildabl• ara;a in ac:ra1 17550 0 PW. T DENSrTY AND DIMENSION CAL CU LA TIQNS VI. Minimum Urban BHidtotial Ponaitv CK CC ZJA 12 060) The minimum denaity r•quir•m•nt a.ppliH ~ to th• R-4 through R-118 zon••· Minimum d•nsity is d•t•rmin•d by multiplying th base d•nsl1'/ in ct-lling unils P•r Kr• (s•• Section 11.) by the n•t buildabl• ill'tl& of th• sit• in acrH (sa• Section V.) and th•n multiplying th• resulting prcdud by the minimum d•nsity p•rcentag• from the KC.C. 21A.12.030 !abl•. Th• minimum d•nsi1y r•quir•ments may b• phased arwaiv.d by King County in c:artain c:u•a. 5•• K.C.C. 21A.12.060 Calculolion ____ 4 bu•d•nsity in du/ac (H• Sec:tian II.)) 8.68 n•t buildable ar•a in aera• (sH Sec:tion V.) Vll. -----....;l;,<,.7,20 X minimum density% sat forth in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 or u adjusted in Sec:tion 1/11. _____ __,2090.501_minimum dw9lling units requir.cl Minimum Pensitv Adiustmenta tor Moderate Slopes (KC C 21AJ 2 08D Residenti~ dwelopm•nts in the R-4. R-6 and R-8 zone,, may modify th• minimum d•n1ity fader in K.C.C. 21A. 12.030 bu•d on the-ighled ·-~· alope ofth• netbuildabl• ;area of th• 1it• (sa• Section V.). Ta d•t•rmin• thawaighl•d average slope. a IDpographic SU"""'f is required lo aJcula.te lh• net buildabl• araa(s) whhin •ach of lh• fallCH!ing slope increments and then multiplying the number of 1quar• l•et in each slope incramenl by the median slope v~ue of each slope incr•m•nl u fallows: --------,',sq. fl O • 5% slop. incram•nt X 2.5% madian slope value _______ 0o0 sq. fl 5 • 10%slope ina11mentX7.5•t. median slopevalu• _______ 000 sq. It 10 • 15% slope increment X 12.5% median 1lope value _______ 000 sq. It 15 • 20% slope increment X 17.5% madia.n slope value 0 sq. It 20 • 25% slope incrementX 22.5% median slope value -------s,csq. fl 25. 30% slope increment X 27.5% median slope value _______ 0o0 sq. It 30 • 35% slope incram•ntX 32.5% median slope value --------,',.sq. It 35 • 40"/• slope increment X 37.5% madian slope va.lu• _______ 000 Tota.lsqUillef .. t _____ 0o0 Tota..laqua,el••t in n•t buildabl• a1•a adjustad tar slop• CalcuLanan: ____ o Iola.I squill• ffft adjusted far slope divided by O total squa,e fHt in n•t builda.bl• atea -igh1ed a...,.rage slope of net buildabl• area --------% (Note: multiply by 100 ta convart ta pen:ent. round up 10 nearast whol• percent) Use th• tabl• below ID datermin• the minimum dansily fac!Dr. This d•nsily is substitutad tor the minimum den1ily lador in K.C.C. 21A. 12.030 ta.bl• wh•n c.a.lculating th• minimum denaity u shDWTI in Section VI. of this workshHl Weighted A-rag• Slope of Net Minimum 0.naily Factor: Build able A,aals) of Site: 0%-lauthanS% 85.00% 5% -Ins than 15% 63%. less 1.5"!.fareach 1%ot ave-R• sloo. in •111:cass of 5% 15% • less than 40% 66%.1ns 2.0%1or •ach 1% of aver•"• sic--in u:cass al 15% EXAMPLE CALOJL.A.110N FOR MINIMUM DENSITY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MODERATE SLOPES: ------,=cc sq. ft O. 5% slope increm•n1 X 2.5% median 1lape value -----...,:1:0000::::csq. It 5 • 10% slope incramen1 )( 7.5% maclian slope value ------=20000=~sq. It 10. 15% slope incr.mant X 12.5% median 1lope value ________ sq. It 15. 20% slope increment X 17.5% median slope value ________ sq. It 20. 25% 1lope incr.mentX 22.5% median slope valu• ________ sq. It 25 • 30% slope incrementX 27.5% madian slope value ________ sq. It 30. 35% slope incr.rnent )( 32.5% median alope value -----~=~sq. It 35. 40% slope increment X 37.5% madian 1lopo value ______ J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,Tota.l squara Ifft 3250 Tata.I square IHI in net buildabl• area adjusted far slop. Calculation: 3250 tata.i square 1 .. 1 a.djusted far slope dividad by total square IHI in n•t builda.til• atH ----0.11 -ightecl :average slope of net buildable a.re• ______ ;.1 ;.1 •a"-c% {Nata: mulbply by 100 to convert ta IM'n:ent • round up ID nearaat whole percent) Using the u.bLe ilbov.. an 11% waightad a-rag• slope of n•I buildabl• ar•a falls within lh• 5% • l•ss than 15% rang• which hu a. minimum densilyfactorof83%, !u111.5%tar ••ch 1% of-rag• 1lope in •111:caH of5%. Sine. 11% is 6% abcNa 5%. multiply 6 ti mas 1.5 which would equal 9%. Subtract 9% from 83% tor a.n adjusted minimum d•nsityla.c:tar at 74%. This r•placas the minimum density t~r in l<.C.C. 21 A. 12.030 tabl•. 3.Jul-01 Paga 3 of• a a a a a a a 750 2500 .... -'. PLAT DENSITY AND DIMENSION CALCULATIONS VIII. Maximum Dwelling Units Allowed (KC C 2JAJ 2 030-040)· This sacbon should be eompleled on~ ,f th• propoH.I inc:ludH application of r•sidantial d•nsity incentivas (K.C.C. 21A.34) or transf•r of density cr•di1 (K.C.C. 21.A..36 or 21.A..55), Muimum density is calculated by adding 1h• bonus or transftir units authori:ied lo th• bas• units c:alcula111d in Sec:lion m. al this wgrksheet The muimum density p~minad thl'Dugh r•sidential density incentives is 150 perean1 al the bu• d•nsity (s-S•dion II.) of th• und•rtying ionmg of lhe.d-lopment or 200 percent ot the bu• den1ityfar propo1als with 100 percent atfordabl• units, The maximum density permitted through tran1fer of den1ity credit is 150 percent ol the bas• density (s•• S•c:tion II,) oflh• underlying zoning of the d-lopment 0 baH dens1ty1n dwelling un,ts p•r a.er• (s-SKbon II) X 150"~ 0 maximum d•ns1ty ---0-muimum density in dwelling units per ac:r• X 11 .14940207 site area in ilCres ~dw1111ing units allow-d utilizing d•n1ity incentive• {K.C.C. 21.A..34) -----------------------=- 0 bas. den1ity in dwelling units per ac:r. (s•• Sec:tion II.) X ZOO'"/• 0 muimum density ---0-maximum d•nsity in d-lling units p•r acrt1 X • 11 .15 sit-. area in aeres O ~dwelling units allOWfll utilizing d•nsity inc:enti1111s with 100% affordable units (K.C.C. 21.A..34) -----------------------=- 0 bu• d•nsity in d-lling units p•r acr11 (11111 Sitdion H.) X 1SO'Y. 0 muimum density ---,-maximum dansity in dwelling units per a.er• X 11 .14940207 sit• art1a in acl'l!s ~dw1111ing units allow.d utilizing densitytrans/111'1 (K.C.C. 21.A..35 or21A.55) -----------------------"- ~c:ulation: 0 bo1H allowilbl• dwelling units Collc:ulated in Section Ill. -------,,,-bonus units authorized by K.C.C. 21A.34 -------.;',.nnst.r units ai.rthorized by K.C.C. 21.A..36 or 21A 55 ________ 00 1otal dwelling units (cannot exce.d muimums c:alc:ulatad above) IX. Minimum lot Area For Construction: X Except es provided for nonconforme.nces in KCC 21 A.32: A B. 1. 2. l.l2l.'tlidlh; In th• UR and R zones no eonstrudlon shall be p•rmit!llo on a lot that contains a.n a1•a of less than 2,500 squaAI f-arthal does not camply with !he applic:a.ble minimum lot width. nee pl lor townhous• d-lopment5 or zaro-lot-lin• subdivisions: and In the A. F. or RA zones: Consuudion shall not be permitted on a lot eonlllining less than 5,000 square leet and Construction shall be limited lo one dwtilling unit and resid•ntial ac:c.ssory UHi for lots containing grt1ahlrthan 5.000 squart1 lllllt bi.rt less than 12.500 square !•et (KCC 21A.12.100) Lot widths shall be measu!Wd by scaling a circ:I• al the applic:abl• diam•t-.rwithin Iha bounda,ias of the lot as shown below. provided that an ac:c:ess •as•m•nt shall not be inc:lud•d within the circle. {See KCC 21A.12 050) 3-Jul-01 Po.ge 4 ot4 King County • Department of Development and Envh ...... nental Services /Land Use Services Division PLAT DENSITY AND / ~00 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton. WA 98055-1219 DIMENSION CALCULATIONS (206) 296-6600 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION WORKSHEET RELATING TO DENSITY AND DIMENSIONS A great many ordinances play a role In the creation of a subdivision within King County. Determining the allowable density, maalmum demslty, minimum density, and lot width on a piece of property can be contusing. This worksheet will assist you In correctly apptylng specific portions of the code and will be uaed to determine if a proposed plat or short plat meets the density and dimensions provisions of the King County Zoning Code (Title 21A). This worksheet ls prepared to assist applicants, and does not replace compllance with adopted local, state and federal laws. Preappltcatlon conferences are recommended. These conferences help to clarify Issues and answer questions. They may save you both time and money by eliminating delays resulting from requests for addltlonal Information and revisions. You may call (206) 296-6640 to find out how to arrange for a preappUcatlon conference. DATE: NAME OF PLAT: fVENDELL FILE NO.:. _______ _ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Urban residenUal/4-12 Units nee Aae ZONING: 8-6 (Pmpgsed) COMMUNITY OR SUBAREA PLAN: NewrasHe If more than one Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation or zone classiflcatlon exists for the property, show the boundary between the land uses or zones and the area within each on the prellmlnary plat map. If a single lot is divided by a zone boundary, transferring density across zones on that lot may be permitted subject to the provisions of KCC 21A.12.200. P/ea:2e comWete 000' the appJJcabte portion, of the form I. Site Area CK CC 21A 06 lf72)· Site area {ln square feet) Is the gross horlzontal area of the project site, .leu submerged lands as defined by K.C.C. 2 IA.06.1265. and lu,_areas which are required to be dedicated on the perimeter of a project site for pubtlc rthgts-of-way. _____ o ____ square feet In submerged land (any land below the ordinary high water mark -see K.C.C. 21 A.06.825.) + 24,495 square feet In perimeter rights-of-way which will be required to be dedicated ---==..c..---(area 30 feet from center line of road) --~2~4~,4~9~5~ __ Total Calculation: II. 566.239 Gross horlzontal area of the project site 24,993 Total submerged lands and rights-of-way 541,246 Site area in square feet NOTE: To continue calculations, convert site area In square leet to acres by dividing by 43,560 ---~1~2~.4~3~ Site area ln acres Base Density (K.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.040 tables): The base density is determined by the zone designation(s) for the lot. 3-Jul-01 Page 1 of4 ---~6--~du/ac:re MAIN FILE COPY II • PL]' DENSITY AND DIMENSION CALCULATIONS 111. A!Jownble Dwelling Units and Boundin2 CK CC 21A 12 070)· Th• bu• numt>., ol dwelling units is c:alculilt•d by multiplying lh• site ilreil by the bu• d•nsity in dwalling units pa, acr• (lrom K.C.C. 21A.12.030. MO tilbl.s). ~ site V9i1 in ilCr•s (se• Secllcn I.) X ______ bu• density (sa• Saaicn II.) ~ 44 60 illlcwabl• dwalling units When calculi1UDM rasult in ii lradlcn. th• frilc:llcn is round.cl tD !h• nailfa1t whcl• number u fellows 1. FradlDns of .50 er a.bow shall b• rounded up: and 2. Fractions b•lc,w .50 shill( be roundad dc,wn 1v. Beauired ONite Bec;reotion Sooce CK c C 21A1 ~ l em· This section mus1 ba com pl.tad only ii th• propoul is ii rasid•ntiill d-lopmant of more thiln lour a-lling un,t,, in th• UR and R zones. 1wd-illone 1l:1wl'lhouses in the NB zone on.property designiltlld Commetciill Outsid• of C.n1ar 11 more thiln four units. or ilny mind use dll'l/lllopment if mer. than /Dur units. R,craallcn space must b• computad by multiplying th• recrailticn space r.quir.mant ~r unit 1YP• byth• propos•d number of such dwa!ting units (K C.C. 21A. 14. 180). NOTE: King County has th• discration to ilCCepl ii I•• in lieu of illl er ii portion of th• r.quir•d r•crHticn spil.Ce par K.C.C 21A. 14.185. Apilrtmen15 ill!d townhous,s d-loped ill ii density graillar thilll eight units per il.Cl"e. and mixlld use must prDYid• recreaticnill space u tcllows: 90 square feet X 130 squilre leet X 170 squilr.leetX _____ proposlld number of studio ilnd on• bedroom unrts ----------------------"''- proposed number of two bedroom units a -----proposed number of thr-or mor• bedroom units _____ Recreation SpilC• Requirement Aesidentiill subdMsions and townhouses d-loped ii! a densit/ of eight units or less per acre must provide rttereiltlOMill space as !cllaws 390 squ .. r• !eet X -----"-proposed number of units "' Mobile home pukl shilll provide recr,alionill space u follows: _____ proposed numti.r of units "' V. Net Buildoble Amo CK C C 21 A 06 79n· This section is UHd for computing minimum density ilnd must b• completed only if th• sit• is loealed in the A.4 through R..118 icn.s and de1-gnilled Urban by th• King Count,' Ccmpr11h,n1ive Pl;i.n. Th• net bui!da.bl• uea is th• silll araa (see s.ction I.) less th• following areas: ---~''-----areas wil.ttin.il projed site which a,. requirad tc be dedicated for public righll-ol-way in ucess of sixly1-t (60') cf width __ __,6=2.090401 ___ sensitiw a.reu and their buffers. tcth• exti1nt1h.yare requir.d by King Counfyto r•ma1n und-laped ___ Jc5c.8_J_S ___ arau required lor i.boYe ground stormwa.ter control li1Cililies including. but not limited ta. retentian/det.ntion ponds, biaf11tra.tion sw&les and setba.cks from such pends and swales ---"'·c7_7_S ___ areu required by King Count)! to ti. dlldic:aled ar res•rved u on-site recr,aticn u.u. Deduct il,.a wrthin stormwa.ler control facility •I niquesllng racra&llan space credit as a!Lcw.d by KOC21A.14.180. (see Section IV.} ---~'-----regio11ill utilify corridars. ilnd ---~'~---other Meas. excluding setbacks. r,quired by King County ta remilln undevelop•d ----'10070 .05051'--__ TDlill raductians Calcule.tion· 3..Jul.01 F'ilge 2 cl <I 485.668 site area in square lee! (s-Sec:bon I.) 107.551 Tatill racluctions ---,3s70i-_'i1 "17~net buildilble i1!9i. in squilfe l••t NOTE. convert sil• area in sc;ua.ra feel to i1Crllll by dividing by 43.560 8 68 net buildable UH in a.eras 0 17550 JI • J . PtA t DENSITY ANO DIMENSION CALCULATIONS VL Minimum Urban Residential Pen1itv fK CC ZJA 12 06DI The minimum denl.ltf requiremu1t ilpplies gnJlf to the R • .Q through R.<!18 zonas. Minimum density is determined by mu!11plying the bu, densi1y in dw.lling units per ure (see SK!ion II.) by the net buildable &reil of the 111, in .,er,u (see Section V.) and tn,n multiplying the rHulting produo by the minimum densl!y percentage lrom the K.C.C. 21A.12.030 !able. The minimum density requirements m&y be phas«I or wa;v.d by King County in e.ruin cues. SH K.C.C 21A.12.060 Colculotlon ____ 4 bue dens!ly in dw'K (see Section II.)> 8.68 nat buildable arH in ;lCl'H (see Section V.) -----...;34;·;12;.. X minimum density %set forth in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 or u adjuated in Sadlon VII. ------"290.05'-1 minimum dw.lllng units raquir.d vu. Minimum Dennm,' Adiustments far Moderate Slopes (ICC C 21A12 087) RHidenti&Jd..,..lapments in the R-4. R-6 &nd A-8zon•• may modify th• minimum den11itylactor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 bued on the -ightecl aver~• slo!)<t of the net buildabl• ar-a of !tie site (s .. Section V.J. To detarrnine ltl• -ighted aver~• slope. a topographic survey is raquired to calculate the net buildable area(s) within eaet, at the foilOW1n9 slope ina,ments and then mu lb plying th• number of squve feet in ,ach 11lo!)<t incrament by the median slo!)<t value of each slope increm,nt u tallows· -------~O sq.It O-S'Y.1lopeiner9ment X 2.5%medianslc1!)<tvalue _______ o,,.sq. ft 5 · 10% slope inerementX7.5% mediar, slope value _______ ,::.O sq. ft 10· 15%slo!)<tincram•ntX12.5%medianslopevalue _______ o,,.sq. ft 15 -20-J. slope increment X 17.5% median slope value _______ o,,.sq. ft 20 • 25% slope increment X 22.5% medi&n slope valu• -------'~sq.ft 25 • 30% slope incrementX 27.5% median slope value _______ O;. sq. ft 30 • 35% slope inerement X 32.5% medi&n slope value -------,,-0 sq, It 35 · <10% slope incrementX 37.5% median slope value _______ O,,.Total squar, teet _____ 0o0 Tota1 square leet in net buildable area adjusted for slope Calculation: ____ o tata1 square feet adjusted for •lope divided by O total 1quare feet in net buildable area ________ -ightlld ..... rage slope at net bulldable araa ________ % (Note: multiply by 100 to canvertto percant ·roundup to nearest whole percant) Use th• table below to dNrrnine the minimum density lacu,r. This de1111ity is 1ub$titut:ed far th minimum density lactDr in K.C.C. 21A 12.030 tabl• when calculating the minimum den1ity u shown in Section VI, at this worllshfft. Weighted Av.rage Slope of Net Minimum Density Factor. Builda.bl• Ar9als\ of Site: 0% • less than 5% 85.00% 5% -less than 15% 13%.le11111.5%1cireKl'I 1%of awrane slo ... ln exaiss of 5% 15% -less than ,40% 66%. leu 2.0% far each 1 % of • ..,. ..... sloce in excess of 15% EXAMPLE CAL.OJLA110N FOR MINIMUM OENSllY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MOOE AA TE SLOPES: ________ sq. ft O · 5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value _____ __:;10000::::,,:.SCI. ft 5 • 10% 1lo!)<t ina.ment X 7.5% median slope Yillue ------"20000=~ .sq. ft 10. 15% slope increment X 12.5% median slope value ________ sq. ft 15. 20% slope increment X 17.5% median slope Yillu• --------.sq.ft 20 · 25% slope incr9ment X 22.5% median slope value sq. ft 25 -30% slope increment X 27.5% modian slope value --------sq. ft 30 • 35% slope incraiment X 32.5% medi•n slope Yillue -----~=~sq. ft 35. 40% slope incroment X 37.5% medi.n slope value _____ 0 300000000_T otal squu. feet 3250 Total squve Ifft in net build.tile area adiustlld for slope Calculation: 3250 IOlal square f .. t adjusted far slope divided by tataJ aquue feet in net bu1ldabl• area ----0.11 -ighted avorago slopo at net build•ble aroa ______ 1 0 10Y.0._% (Note: multlp*'f by 100 ta CCIM/911 ta percar.1 • round up to n•uest whole percant) U,ing th• table .aove. an 11%-ighted average slope of net buildabl• area !alts within the 5% • less th•n 15% rU1ge which hu • minimum der.sity factor of 113%. less 1.5% tor euh 1 % of a-rage slope ir. _ .. of 5%. Since 11% is &Y. ll>OYe 5%. multip*'f6 times 1.5 which would aqua! 9%. Subtract 9% from 83% for •n adjusted minimum den1ity factor ot 14"1 •. This r•plK:91 the minimum density fM:tor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table 3.Jul.01 Page J of 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 2500 pt.,(f DENSl1Y ANO DIMENSION CALCULATIONS VIII. Maximum Dwelling llnit1 All<tWffd lK CC 21A 12 D30· MO)· This sKlion should b• ,;ompletad only i1 th• proposal ineludes .pplication of residen11al density incenlives (K C.C. 21A34) or tr.l.ns1er at dansity CJitdit (K.CC 21 A.36 or 21A.55J. lvluimum density is c:alculatad by adding the bonus or tr~sler units au1horind h:I the bM• units calculilt..:I in Sadlon Ill. ct this wor~het The maximum density perm1hd thlClugll residential densi1y incanUV.s is 150 percant ot the bue density (SH SKtion U.) ot the underlying zoni11g at lh• d-lopment or 200 pttrcant of the bu• densi1y for prop0$11.ls with 100 percent affard;a.ble units. The muimum density permitted through transfer oldens it; ~it is 150 pen:ent al the bue density (SH S.ct1011 II.) of the underlying zoning Cl! the d-lopment. ----iO,-buedentily in dwelling unrts per acra js-Sedlon It.) X 150°/. 0 miilQmum density ---,---O',maxim1,1m density in dwelling units p•r aera X 11.14940207 sita a.rea in K1es ______________________ _,00 maximum dwelling units iJ1aw.d utilizing d•nsity incenti...s {K.C.C. 21A.34) 0 bueden5ity in dw.lling unitli p•r acra (s .. Section It.) X 200"/• 0 muimum densit, ----0 muimumdensityin~llingunitsperaer• x· 11.15 sitliu.ainaer•s o ~dw91\ing un1tli i.l!owad utilizing d•nsifo,, incenti...s with 100"1. affordable unrts (K.C.C. 21A.34) -----------------------"- 0 bue den,itj in d-lling units per aer• (s .. Section ti.} X 150"/• 0 muimum d•nsity ----0 muimumd•nsityin~Hingunitsp•raca"• X 11.14940207 sitliu.ainaeres O ~dwalling units ;i.llc:,wed utilizing d•nsrtytransf•rs (K.C.C. 21A.36 or ZlA.55) -----------------------"- Calculation: -------~O bu• allawabl• clwalllng uniU ca!eulat•d in S•dion m. -------',-0 bonus uniU authorized by K.C C. ZlA.34 -------.,,-0 transf•r uniU authorizad by K.C.C. ZtA.36 or21A.55 ________ o total dwalling units (cannot IIXCffd maicimums c.Jculat•d abow} IX. Minimum lot Alee. For Construction: Except e.s provided for nonconforme.nces in KCC 21A32: A 8 \nth• UR and Rmn•s no construction shall be p•m,itted on a lotlhat contains an ar•a of less than 2.500 sq11ar• f..t or that does not comply with th• app!ic:a.bl• minim11m lot width, ucept for townho111• d-lopments or zaro-lot-tine subcliv1siOns: and In lh• A, F. or RA zones: Construction shall not be parmitt•d on a lot containing l11ss lhan 5.000 squar11 l1111t: and 2. Con5trudlon shall be limited to on• i;w.11in9 unit and residential accessory uses for lots containing greatarthan S.OOOsquarel"t. but!•ss than 1Z.500 squ&r• feel (KCC ZlA lZ.100) Lot widths shall be measured by scaling a circle ol the applic:able diametarwilhin the boundaries ol th• lot as shown below. pn'.Mded thal an aecess euemttnt shill! not be includad within th• eirde. (S .. KCC 21A.1Z.OSO). 3·Jul-{)1 Pe.ge 4 of 4 ,e-v ,l}(JT Parcel Number: 1423059022 Taxpayer: MAIR ROBERT Annexation: N/A Jurisdiction: Unincorporated King County Situs Address: 13606 156TH AVE SE Postal City: Renton, 98059 Plat Name: ; Rec: nil Lot: N/A; Block: NIA Kroll Page: 811 E Thomas Bros. Page: 657 1/4-S-T-R: SE-14-23-5 Acres: 2.39 (104108 SqFt.) Current Zoning: R-4 Potential Zoning: Comp. Plan Land Use: um Assessors Open Space: N/A Commercial Use: N/A Number of Units: NIA Mobile Home: Y Land Value: 81000 Improvements Value: 91000 Community Plan Area: Newcastle Unincorporated Area Council: Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council School District: Renton 403 Fire District: 25 Roads MPS Zone: 452 ($2128.00) Waterfront: No Water Service: WATER DISTRICT Water Service Planning Area: King County Water District 90 Sewer Service: PRIVATE Airport Noise Remedy Program: N/A Bald Eagle Flag: N/A Council District: 12 David Irons Jr. (R) Drainage Basin: Lower Cedar River, WRJA 8 Police: King County, Pct: 3, Dist: F2 Service/Finance Strategy Area: Service Planning Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Rural Agricultural District: N Forest Production District: N Rural Forestry District: N TDC Program: N/A Building Inspection Area: Terry Hammond Clearing Inspection Area: Bruce Engell Code Enforcement Inspection Area: Jeri Breazeal ESA Inspection Area: Chris Tiffany Grading Inspection Area: Chris Tiffany Land Use Inspection Area: Gary Casad Sens. Areas Notice(s) on Title: NONE MAIN FILE COPY s -1~\ill K.C. D.D.E.S. @ U o(P@!g #b ...... King County Road Services Division Department ofTran.sportation 201 S0u1hJ.:ickson Street Sea tile, WA 98104-3856 TYPE OF CERTIFICATE [8J ORIGINAL 0 CONDITIONAL May 24, 2001 Certificate # 01305 File Number: 01-05-14-02 Exoires: Mav 24, 2002 CERTIFICATE OF TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY 0 Specific conditions are described on the reverse side of this certificate. Pursuant to King County Code, Chapter 14.70 as amended, this certificate confirms that the level of service standard used in the Transportation Concurrency Management program has been satisfied and sufficient road capacity is reserved for the development project described below. IMPORTANT: This certificate does not guarantee a development permit. Other transportation improvements and mitigation will be required to comply with Intersection Standards, Mitigation Payment System, King County road standards, and/or safety needs. 1. Applicant Name and Address: Centurion Development Services 22617 8th Drive S.E., Bothe!, WA 98021 2. Property Location: a. Property Address: 13606 158th Ave. S.E b. Development Name: Evendell c. Parcel Number: 1423059009 3. Type of Development Permit To Be Requested: Formal Plat 4. Proposed Land Use: Single Family Residential 5. Zone Location and Reserved Units: a. Concurrency Zone: 452 Community Planning Area: Newcastle i. Commercial Project -Total Square Feet: 0 ii. Multi-family -Number of Units: 0 iii. Single family -Number of Units: 75 6. This Certificate is subject to the following general conditions: a. This Certificate of Concurrency runs with the land and is transferable only to subsequent owners of the same property for the stated development, subject to the terms. conditions and expiration date listed herein. This Certificate of Concurrency is not transferable to any other property and has no commercial value. This Certificate Expires: May 24, 2002 unless you apply for the development permit described above. prior to that date. If this requirement is not met the King County Department of Transportation reserves the option to cancel your certific.ate and capacity reservation. When you apply for a development permit with King County's Department of Dt!vclopment and Em·ironml:!ntal Services (DDES), bring this Certificate of Transportation Concurrency as part of the development application pack:.1ge. If you have any questions, please call (206) 263-4722. ~/_:~;ac~;:.Ti:i)~'' · ... ,, '; [)' --'---------.j~ lr.L "" ~ 2~~1 _J_) J-..,1L -.; -!J~ Linda Dougherty, Acting Manager. Road Services 1vision Department of Transportation King County. Washington ~, f"" ., '""" ·,-: !" ¥"\.v. L,.u.i:.-.\J. Exhibit No. :--<Z=..a,C..:.o ___ _ MAIN FILE COPY Item No. .l& If' t)t)) lo :'t LC'.l I Received a-(p ·-03 (@ ·:@ KlngCounty Road Services Division Depctrtment of Transportation 201 Southjack.-.on Street Sc;1ttlc, WA 98104-3856 TYPE OF CERTIFICATE l8J ORIGINAL 0 CONDITIONAL -~ "---- May 24, 2001 Certificate # 01307 File Number: 01-05-14-01 Expires: Mav 24, 2002 CERTIFICATE OF TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY D Specific conditions are described on the reverse side of this certificate. Pursuant to King County Code, Chapter 14.70 as amended, this certificate confirms that the level of service standard used in the Transportation Concurrency Management program has been satisfied and sufficient road capacity is reserved for the development project described below. IMPORTANT: This certificate does not guarantee a development perf!lit. Other transportation improvements and mitigation will be required to comply with Intersection Standards, Mitigation Payment System, King County road standards, and/or safety needs. l. Applicant Name and Address: Centurion Development Services 22617 8th Drive S.E., Bethel, WA 98021 2. Property Location: a. Property Address: 13606156th Ave. SE b. Development Name: Evendell c. Parcel Number: 1423059022 3. Type of Development Permit To Be Requested: Formal Plat 4. Proposed Land Use: Single Family Residential 5. Zone Location and Reserved Units: a. Concurrency Zone: 452 Community Planning Area: Newcastle i. Commercial Project -Total Square Feet: 0 ii. Multi-family-Number of Units: 0 iii. Single family -Number of Units: 11 6. This Certificate is subject to· the following general conditions: a. This Certificate of Concurrency runs with the land and is transferable only to subsequent owners of the same property for the stated development, subject to the terms, conditions and expiration date listed herein. This Certificate of Concurrency is not transfer~ble to any other property and has no commercial value. This Certificate Expires: May 24, 2002 unless you apply for the development permit described above, prior to that date. If this requirement is not met the King County Department of Transportatioffreserves the option to cancel your certificate and capacity reservation. When you apply for a development permit with King County's Department or Development and Environmental Services (DOES), bring this Certificate of Transportation Concurrency as part or the development application package. Ir you have any questions, please call (206) 263-4722. Linda Dougherty, Acting Manager, Road Services Department of Transportation King County, Washington • ,.1,1, .. REcie, n A IEllV/E{Q) !Rl!ECIE~~IE[D) A g& 2~04 2002 King County Executive OCT l 4 2002 L N~1~~~ES Ron Sims KING COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECK~l!l USE SERVIIWJ I PO O 16 Purpose of Checl<Jist: The State Environmental Policy Ad (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applications: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checl<list for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D.). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Exhibit No. ~ 4 Item No. Lo \'Pt>a I lg ~ l-.a 11'-lLf 0/ Rec"e1ved ;, ,) -& -C)~ [Ch.197-11 RCWp.40] King County He~r!n,9 Examiner (1983 Laws) f SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: EVENDELL 2. Name of applicant: U.S. Land DIM!lopment Associates 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 4. C/0 CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 22617-8™ DR. SE. BOTHELL, WA 98021 (425) 486-2563 ATTN: Michael J. Romano Date checklist prepared: ll.llay 22, 2001 5. Agency requesting checklist: KING COUNTY 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Land d2Velopment is p!anood to occur in Spring/Summer 2003. Building construction will occur fall of 2003 through 2005. 7. Do you have any plans for Mure additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Wetland reconnaissance, traffic studies, drainage studies, soil studies. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for government approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Zone reclassfficatio req11 t concurrent witt1 plat submittal. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. if known. Pretiminary PtaJt Approval, rezone approval, Engineering Approval, NPOES, Forest Practices, Final Plat Approval: -2- [Ch.1 97-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) 'I SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. EIR!t'ldell is a ~sed 75 lot single family detach2d p&at. Th2 subject ~ is zoned R-4 and contains an area of appn>Kimately 13 acres. Th2 siOe is localed in the Reiiltu,, Highlands area of King County in the ll!2wcastle planning. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient infonnation for a person to understand the precise location of our proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal v.ould occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The subject 5* is located in the SE Y, of Section 14, T~ip 23 Norih, Range 5 East, W.llll., King County, Washington south of SE 136111 Street between 156"' Ave. SE and 160"' Ave. SE. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. Rolling b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 10% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification as agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Site soils consist of Aldet wood series (AgB). -3- [Ch.197-1 1 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NO. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximaaely 15,000 CY cut- to-fill with onsite soils. It is anticipated that the site ea, ti ,..ori< quantities will ba4ance. f. Could erosion OCOJr as a result clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. There will be the potential for erosion due to construction of the project. This potential will be mitigaGed through implementation of an evosion controllwa1ler management plan using Best Management Practices. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 50 -60%. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. Use of Best~ Practices including: temporary swales with sumps and chack-dams, mulching, seeding, visq1 eMn sheeting, sediment traps and ponds, silt fence. Stonn water deaentiort and treatment facilities will be designed and constructed in accordance with the King County Drainage Manual and Dapa,b,ee.'lt of Ecology standards. A Washington State Depa1b,cent of Eco4ogy NPDES pevmit will be required and will specify the method of stonn waler control, treatment and monitoring during construction. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, indusbial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. Dust and combustion engine e11haust during construction. Automobile exhaust and wood smolle from fireplaces aftef' home building. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odors that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Unknown c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Mod2m construction machinery will be employed in the pem,rmam:e of the wcwk. Walering will be used to control dust during construction. Wood stc)lles, if used, will be of modem make and will mut cunent .egulatory standards [Ch.197-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (induding year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. n-e is one isotaded W<l!Uand on the site. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. Homes, roads and utilities will be consbuded within 40' of the wetland edge. 3. Estimate in the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities., if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Potlutants associated with typical urban resimential de\:alopments may eYentually make their way to surface wate.s. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No ground water will be witt.dlawn. Stonn water discharged from the onsitJe -5- [Ch.197-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT ~ quality facility may eventually recharge ground wa6er. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any, (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Pollutants in storm water discharges from onsite treatment facilities typical for residential ~elopn.ents may eventually reach ground water. c. Water Runoff (including stonn water): 1 . Describe the source of runoff (induding stonn water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (induding quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm WcJtJer ru~ from roofs, yards, driveways and st, e:ts will be diredecl by street gutters and yard dr.Dcnage S}lsa."115 to catch basins and underground storm pi$1,es. R~ coll2cted by the underground storm water pipes will be conveyed to an onsite detention pond and water quality treatment facility. Storm flows will be discharged at the natural points of the discharge. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe: Typical pollutants associatled with urban resfmntial delielopments cou6d eventually reach surface or ground w I e rs. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: A storm water system will be constructed to collect, convey and treat run-Gfl' gen.a.ailed from the site. Tm! storm water detention and treat»u.a1t facilities will be designed and constructed in accC1dance witt1 the King County Drainage l\llanual and ~tb,ldlt of Eco6ogy standards. -6- [Ch.197-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULIES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 4. Plants a. Check or cirde types of vegetation found on the site: X X X X X X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: fruit trees, cottonwood, evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup. bullrosh, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation (landscaping) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Land clearing typically associated with urban residential de'>elopnent activity will occur on the site including areas of typical We stem Washinp1 recent growth forest and pasture. This will include tree cutting, stump and undergrowth grubbing and removal and stripping of sod. Exceoit for ~ion localed within the wetland, wetland buffer and associated buffer replzcement averaging area all vegetation on the site will be removed in onler to allow site grading and construction of roads, utilities, reaeation and stormwater detention facilities. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Yards will be landscapc2d using typical Pacific Northwest plantings. 5. Animals a. Cirde any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawks, heron, eagle, songbirds, other -woodpeckers. mammals: ~ bear, elk, beaver, other. rodents, coyotes, raccoons fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other. -7- [Ch.197-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unlmown. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. Retain2d native vegetation within the sensitive areas tract associated with the wetland and buffer will continue to provided habit.rt for varioYs mammals, amphibians and birds. Yard landscaping will provide habitat opportunitias for birds and tree loving mammals. Typical landscaping is likely to include combinations of lawn, landscape plants, shrubs and trees that thrive in the maritime environment of we stem Washington and various annual and perennial flowers. Typical shrubs might include rhododendn,.,, azalea, Japa1'12Se maple, boKWOC>d, juniper, pyramidalis etc. Trees might include dogwood, magnolia, cedar, blue spruce, cheny, plum and ash. In addition, street trees are required which will also provide habitat opportunities. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. E.lectric and natural gas service will provide the primary sources of en2r'QY. Wood stoves and soiar may be used as supplemental energy sources. b. Would the project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Land clearing may improve solar access by adjoining properti25. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are induded in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Modem home construction m:ettoods and materials will be empklyed to conserve eaiergy. -8- [Ch.1 97-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. fl!o. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicabk>. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. b. Noise 1 . What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic on adjacent st.eels, barning dogs, EMV sirens, other noises typical to an urban residential environment. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-tern, or a long-tern, basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. During land dewlopment there will be heavy equipment engine noise and noises associated with equipment maintenance. During hom2 building there will be delivery truck traffic, nail guns and saws. After build-out there will be traffic noise on the inlemal st, ets and other noises typical to an urban residential environment. Construction noise will be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM llilondaly through Friday and 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM on Saturdays. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction eq,e;:,ment will be fitted with modem eJthaust muffling daYices and will be maintained in good working order. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties. Re idential and past, me. -9- [Ch. 197-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Unknown c. Describe any structures on the sites. One large home and several outbuildings. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? All of the outbuildings will be demolism!d. Thi! enistin9 home will li6lely remain. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-4 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation for the site? Urban Residentiall4-12 Units per Acre. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicab4e. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes. A wetland has been identified. The wetiand rm!aSUreS approximaClely 17, 162 square feet and meets the criteria fOf' a Class 2 weUand 2CCcwding to King County sensitive area codes. 1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed Project. Approximately 20& peop!e. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Nol'l8. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. NA. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. The proposal complies with current~ plans and is in character with future de·, elapment pro1timatie to the sile. -10- [Ch.1 97-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income building. 75 units of middle income housing. b. Approximalely how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Nona. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: When com~ the project will provida 74 new single family detac'-1 middle income homes. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 35 feet. Wood, brick, stucco. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? V~ ova or inward to the project site will ~ altered from forest and p,!)Sture to modem, well designed homes and landscaped yards. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. The project p,oposes 74 new, modem, vrell-desigm!d homes and landscaped yards 11 . Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly ocrur? Automobile headlights and strwtlights at night. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Giare from streetlights may i111evfen! with the view of nearby residents of the night sky. Automobile headlights may cause temporary discomfort for oncoming drivers. -11- (Ch.1 97-11 RCW-p.40) (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. What existing off-site source of light or glare may affect your proposal? Automooite headlights and street lights from adjacent saeets. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. Street lighting in confonnance with Puget Sound Energy (PSE) standards will be provid!!d. Typically this would include streetlights at the co:, ,lef"S af the loop road and ottl2I" locations as deemed appropriadle to ~ a safe nighttime driving and walking environmant. Typical streetlights would consist of a 150-watt flat lens luminaire locatied atop a 25' light standard. Streetlights will be designed to minimize glare. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Urtde110elc,ped King County pant land lies appronimately 2000' W8st of the site. Maplewood Pat1< is about 1 mils southwest of the site. Maplewood I !eights park is .4 milss soutm!ast of the site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. A minimum of 29,250 square feet of 2Ctive and passive recreation space will be provided in conjunction with the project including a tot lot, larg2 play apparatus and sport court. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally descfibe. No wittl regard to the subject site. Unknown with regard to adjoining Pl operties. b. Generally descfibe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Nom! knol:m. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. Not appAicalffl!. -12- [Ch.1 97-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is bounded on the north by SE 136th St, on the east by 154"' Ave. SE and on the ,:;i:est by 156"' Ave. SE. Project aiccess for the 75 lot R-o zoning~ is proposed via SE 136"' St. from a single proj2ct emrylegl e s point. Project access for the 44 lot R-4 current zoning aMemative is prG90Sed from 160"' Ave. SE from a single access point. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? King County/Metro provides transit service in the vicinity of the site. Roules 111 and 114 provide service along SE 128"' Street, SE 144"' Street and 144"' Avenue SE. The nearest bus stop to the proposed project is located on the southeast comer of 156"' Ave. SEJSE. 128"' Street. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Approximately 300 off-street sp;nces wou!d be provided for the single family hoffl25 utilizing driveways and garages. No sp;nces would be eliminatied. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to the existing roads or streets, not induding driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Yes. Public interiol" plat roads will be required to provide neighbomood traffic circulation and z,c,: s to the proposed residential units. Upgraded access to the site and frooltaga improvements may be required. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. According to the traffic report ~ for this project approximately 708 new trips per day would be gene,aded. Peak volumes would occur during the All! and PM commuaes with approximately 55 AM peal< hoYr trips and 75 PM peak hour trips. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. Interior plat roads meeting King County Road Standards will be construdJed to provide inte.ior circulation. County Mitigation Payment System Fees (MPS) will be paid for each lot to mitigate offsite impacts to the regional County road infrastructure. Transit service to the site may reduce overall traffic impacts. -13- [Ch.1 97-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) r . TO: ~,e·{)pe~ A1lr£ .' JC,e,.µ,..; $'°~ FROM: Ce 10, velopment Services 22617 -8th Dr. SE Bothell, WA 98021 f11 t,h~e[_ J' ~1'1.6-vO ' ·.~U~JECT: .. 1 MESSAGE: .OCT 1 4 2002 RECIFORM, 4S468/4P468 POLYPAK (50 SETS) 0 NO REPLY NECESSARY D REPLY REQUESTED -USE REVERSE SIDE CARBONLESS SPEED/SET • SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT OCT 1 4 2002 15. Public Services a. K11,u ,,\JUN/ y Would the project result in an increased need forlp{l.bi11£ ~i®l~~EC: example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)~ If so generally describe. Yes. ~~ ~ in the im~ vicinity due to the p,o;,t'fid pntjee1 will ~ ~dttional fire, police and ema.yµ,oicy ~ p,uli:ecoon. It is ~y that som2 of the naw hom2s will comain ~ wwt1 schook!p c~ ~ng in inc!"ell54!d ~ for edlll"-""lrfln 5'2fVices. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. ~ tins, if~. will b2 pacd on eech individual unit. Portions of the p,o;,:2rty ta= pzCd by the horns/lot owners will be~ to the various puh!ic service provi¢efs. 1 6. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site; e!a:tlicity1 naitural gas, water, rduse S<enlice. ~. saamy -,., septic system, other. Cabe2 TV. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Eh:diccity and Na:nr.11 Gas will be pn,vidiad by Pupt Smmd Enemy: Cal!m! TV S2VYeCe will b2 provided by AT&T B'Jw'ilismd; T ' 21towe H!7va::e will b2 ~ by 9!ifflst. Se· e r.seo lice will Ila Dl"O~ilmd by the Ci1y of Ra.1»11. EJdJensicn of a,10".lllmmivor 12" disui . • rss ~tnmk im:n will b2 reg1 eket[plcna SE 1ii'?'. 9lR1et. Iii a,., Hlfun," ·a ss ge l!lfim SW-Vnn" · will beragul@d.in twe SE comer to the pme1,aety. Wc!!Jar Sl!VVioe will be•Pf(Mded by'King.Ccumy water District #Jltl. Cctoi~IS to the various service mams will be made at the protect frmge on SE 136&,'St. and/ex' 1iiJ&i AISe. SE. Undeimc.md wvice v.R!I b2 constr'uded in~ witf'I roa:d ~ !lbm ~ construction~- C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and com to the best of knowledge. I understand that the 1911,iAti on them to make its decision. ' Date Submitted: ~&-=""~""/)"'-__,,_l!-"''tJ~I..L,L't;;;-"'-"'Z.~---- -13- [Ch.197-1 1 RCW-p.40] (1983Laws) r::::----F~lE COPY ~[E\f i C' t \~~n · · ~ ,.,.J; l! '\di U\'J King County Executive lLO 1 PO o l (' Ron Sims ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Check.list: RECETVED AUG 2 9 2002 h,1~u 1.,UU!\JTY LANO USE SERVICES The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applications: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmar1( designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checl<list for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D.) For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. -1- [Ch.197-11 RCWp.40] (1983 Laws) r; SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: EVENDELL 2. Name of applicant: U.S. Land De·. elopment Associates 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 4. C/0 CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 22617-3TH DR. SE. BOTHEU, WA 98021 (425) 486-2563 ATTN: Michael J. Romano Date checklist prepared: May 22, 2001 5. Agency requesting checklist: KING COUNTY 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Land development is planned to occur in Spring/Summer 2003. Building construction will occur fall of 2003 through 2005. 7. Do you have any plans for Mure additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Wetland reconnaissance, traffic studies, drainag2 studies, soil studies. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for government approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Zone reclassificatio request concunent with plat submittal. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Preliminary Plat Approval, rezone approval, Engineering Approval, NPOES, Forest Practices, Final Plat Approval. -2- [Ch.1 97-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) /. SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Evendell is a proposed 75 lot single family detached plat. The subject property is zoned R-4 and contains an area of approximately 13 acres. The sile is located in the Re,ltoo Highlands area of King County in the Newcastte p4anning. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of our proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The subject site is located in the SE Y. of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington south of SE 136"' Street bets e en 156"' Ave. SE and Hio'" Ave. SE. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. Rolling b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 10% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification as agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Site soils consist of Aldefwood setu!S (Age). -3- [Ch.197-1 1 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NO. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 15,000 CY cut- to-fill with onsite soils. It is anticipated that the sile ea, th..or1< quantities will balance. f. Could erosion occur as a result clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. There will be the po1ential for erosion due to construction of the project. This potential will be mitigated through impleme,11atiu,i of an erosion controllwater management plan using Best Management Praciices. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 50 -60%. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. Use of Best Management Practices including: temporary swales with sumps and check-dams, mulching, seeding, visqt""Pl"I sheeting, sediment traps and ponds, silt fence. Storm water detention and trwtmem facilities will be designed and constructed in accordance with the King County Drainage Manual and Depa1b11em of Ecology standards. A Washington State Depatb,ce,lt of Eco6ogy NPDES permit will be required and will specify the method of storm water control, treatment and monitoring during construction. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. Dust and combustion engine e11haust during construction. Automobile exhaust and wood smoke from firep4aces after "-'e bui4ding. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odors that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Unknown c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Modem construc:tion machinery will be employed in the perfonnance of the work. Watering will be used to control dust during construction. Wood stoYes, if used, will be of modem ma1u! and will meet cunent rege ,latcvy standards -4- [Ch.197-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is one iso4ated wetland on the site. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. Homes, roads and utilities will be constructed within 40' of the wetland edge. 3. Estimale in the amount of fill and dredge matertal that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities., if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Pollutants associated with typical urban residential de\elopme111ts may eventually make their way to sunace waes. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No ground watef' will be witt.diawn. Stonn water discharged from the onsite -5- [Ch.197-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT detention/water quality facility may eventually recharge ground water. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any, (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable}, or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Pollutants in storm water discharges from ?flSite treatment facilities typical for residential devel~ may eventually reach ground water. c. Water Runoff (including stem, water): 1 . Describe the source of runoff (including stonn watef) and method of collection and disposal, if any (including quantities, if known). Where will this water ftow? Will this water ftow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water run-off from roofs, yards, driveways and stt ets will be directed by street gutters and yard drainage syste.ns to cau:h basins and underground storm pipes. Run-off collec:tecl by the underground storm water pipes will be conw:yed to an onsite detention pond and water quality treatment facility. Storm flows will be discharged at the natural points of the discharge. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe: Typical pollutants associated with urt>an residential del.ela9me11ts could eYentually reach surface or ground waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: A storm water system will be constructed to collect, convey and treat run-off gene,ated from the site. The storm water detention and beatment facilities will be designed and constructed in ac:cordance with the King County Drainage Manual and Depa,biient of Ecology standards. -6- [Ch.197-1 1 RCW-p 40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULIES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, rnapte. aspen, other: fruit trees, cottonwood, X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: X shrubs X grass X pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, butlen:up, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other X other types of vegetation (landscaping) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Land clearing typically associated with urt>an residential de1. elopment activity will occur on the site including areas of typical We stem Washington recent growth forest and pasture. This will include tree cutting, stump and undergrowth grubbing and removal and stripping of sod. Except for vei,etalion located within the wetland, wetland buffer and associated buffer repacement averaging area all vegetat.on on the site will be remo'Jed in onter to allow site grading and construction of roads, utilities, recteation and sto, mwater detention facilities. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Yards will be landscaped using typical Pacific Northwest plantings. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawks, heron, eagle, songbirds, other· woodpeckers. mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: rodents, coyotes, raccoons fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other. -7- [Ch.197-11 RCW-p.40) (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. Retained native wgetatio.1 within the sensitive areas tract associated with the wetland and buffer will continue to provided habitat for various mammals, amphibians and birds. Yard landscaping will provide habitat opportunities for birds and tree loving mammals. Typical landscaping is likely to include combinations of lawn, landscape plants, shrubs and trees that thrive in the maritime environment of u e stam Washington and various annual and perennial flowers. Typical shrubs might include rhododendrioo, azalea, Japanese maple, boxwood, juniper, pyramida!is etc. Trees might include dogwood, magnolia, cedar, blue spn.ece, cherry, plum and ash. In addition, street trees are required which will atso provide habitat opportunities. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Elecbic and natural gas service will provide the primary sources of energy. Wood stoves and solar may be used as SUf111lemental energy sources. b. Would the project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Land clearing may improve solar access by adjoining pn,petties. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Modem home construction methods and materials will be employed to conserve energy. -8- [Ch.1 97-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not apf)licabfe. b. Noise 1 . What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic on adjacent s1teets, barking dogs, EMV sirens, other noises typical to an urban residential environment. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. During land deYelopment there will be heavy equipment engine noise and noises associated with eq11ip ment maintenance. During home building there will be delivefy truck traffic, nail guns and saws. After build-out there will be traffic noise on the internal s1teets and other noises typical to an urban residential environment. Construction noise will be limited to the hours of 7:00 Al'll to 10:00 PM Monday through Friday and 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM on Saturdays. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction eqeqpment will be fitted with modem exhaust muffling devices and will be maintained in good working order. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties. Residential and pasture. -9- [Ch.197-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Unknown c. Describe any structures on the sites. One large home and several OI itbuildings. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? All of the Oldi>uildings will be demcllished. The existing home will likely remain. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-4 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation for the site? Urban Residential#4-12 Units per Acre. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not apf)licabte. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area0 If so, specify. Yes. A weUand has been m..,tified. The wetland mea5Ul'1!S approximately 17, 162 square feet and meets the criteria for a Class 2 weUand acconting to King County sensitive area codes. 1. Approximaiely how many people would reside or INOrk in the completed Project. Approximately 206 people. J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. NA. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. The proposal complies with current comprehensive p6ans and is in character with future de·,elopment proximate to the site. -10- [Ch.1 97-11 RCW-p.40) (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 9. Housing a. Approximately how many uni1s would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income building. 75 units of middle income housing. b. Approximately how many uni1s, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: When completed the project will provide 74 new single family detached middle income homes. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed strudure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 35 feet. Wood, brick, stucco. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views OYll!f" or inward to the project site will be altered from forest and pasture to modem, well designed homes and landscaped yards. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. The project proposes 74 new, modem, vrelldesigned homes and landscaped yards 11 . Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Automobile headlights and sbwtlights at night. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Glare from sbwtlights may interfere with the view of m!arby residents of the night sky. Automobile headlights may cause temporary discomfort for oncoming drivers. -11- [Ch.1 97-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. What existing off-site source of light or glare may affect your proposal? Automobile headlights and street lights from adjacent s1ieets. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. Street lighting in conformance with Puget Sound Energy (PSE) standards will be provided. Typcally this would include s1i etlights at the comers of the loop road and other locations as deemed appropriale to provide a safe nighttime driving and waJking environment. Typical streetlights would consist of a 150-watt flat lens luminaire located atop a 25' light standard. Streetlights will be designed to minimize glare. 12. Recreation a. What designaled and infonnal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Undeuelapecl King County park land lies approximately 2000' west of the site. Maplewood Park is about 1 mile southwest of the site. Maplewood I leights part< is .4 miles southeast of the site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. A minimum of 29,250 square feet of adiYe and passive recreation space will be provided in conjunction with the project inciuding a tot lot, large p4ay apparatus and sport court. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No with regard to the subject site. Unknown with regard to adjoining properties. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. Not applicable. -12- [Ch.1 97-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. ShOIIY on site plans, if any. The site is bounded on the nonh by SE 136th St, on the east by 154"' Ave. SE and on the west by 156"' Ave. SE. Project access for the 75 lot R-6 zoning alb!mati¥e is propcsed via SE 136"' St. from a single project el'ltr)#egf:e ss point. Project access for the 44 lot R--4 current zoning a!aematille is pnlf>OSed from 160"' Ave. SE from a single access point. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? King County/Metro provides transit sevvice in the vicinity of the site. Roules 111 and 114 provide service along SE 128"' Stft!et, SE 144"' Street and 144"' Avenue SE. The nearest bus stop to the propt1sed project is located on the southeast comer of 156"' Ave. SEJSE. 128"' Street. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Approximately 300 off-street spaces would be provided for the single family homes utilizing driveways and garages. No spaces would be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to the existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Yes. Public i,dei ior p&at roads will be required to provide neighborhood traffic circulation and access to the ptoposed residential units. Upgraded access to the site and fvontage improvements may be required. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. According to the traffic report prepared for this project approximately 708 new trips P2f° day would be gene.ated. Peak volumes would occur during the AM and PM commutes with approximately 55 AM peak hour trips and 75 PM peak a-trips. g Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. Interior p&at roads n e eting King County Road Standards will be constructed to provide i,deiior circulatiorl. County Mitigation Payment System Fees (MPS) will be paid for each lot to mitigate offsite impacts to the regional County road intrastructure. Transit service to the site may reduce overall traffic impacts. -13- [Ch.1 97-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) ; Purpose of Checklist: King County Executive Ron Sims ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applications: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON~9='1:\5op'( ACTIONS (part D.). MAIN I-IL For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the wordr~Pf9i~st;', "appli,c~~t.~nd "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and/ "affected_g~ograp~ 1 area," respectively. _fl 1 ,. " n r ..• 11-V -1- [Ch.197-11 RCWp.40] -·--~-l..uj - V ,-, ·, ··, -n '"·'"'· , • ..l ... ~.s. ~ (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: EVENDELL 2. Name of applicant: U.S. Land Development Associates 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 4. C/0 CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 22611.5TH DR. SE. BOTHELL, WA 98021 (425) 486-2563 ATTN: Michael J. Romano Date checklist prepared: May 22, 2001 5. Agency requesting checklist: KING COUNTY 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Land development is planned to occur in Spring/Summer 2003. Building construction will occur fall of 2003 through 2005. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Wetland reconnaissance, traffic studies, drainage studies, soil studies. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for government approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Zone reclassification request concurrent with plat submittal. 1 O. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Preliminary Plat Approval, rezone approval, Engineering Approval, NPDES, Forest Practices, Final Plat Approval. -2- [Ch.1 97-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Evendell is a proposed 75 lot single family detached plat. The subject property is zoned R-4 and contains an area of approximately 13 acres. The site is located in the Renton Highlands area of King County in the Newcastle planning. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of our proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The subject site is located in the SE Y. of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington south of SE 1361h Street between 1561h Ave. SE and 1601h Ave. SE. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. Rolling b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 10% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification as agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Site soils consist of Alderwood series (AgB). -3- [Ch.197-1 1 RCW-p.40) (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NO. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 15,000 CY cut- to-fill with onsite soils. It is anticipated that the site earthwork quantities will balance. f. Could erosion occur as a result clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. There will be the potential for erosion due to construction of the project. This potential will be mitigated through implementation of an erosion control/water management plan using Best Management Practices. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 50 -60%. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. Use of Best Management Practices including: temporary swales with sumps and check-dams, mulching, seeding, visqueen sheeting, sediment traps and ponds, silt fence. Storm water detention and treatment facilities will be designed and constructed in accordance with the King County Drainage Manual and Department of Ecology standards. A Washington State Department of Ecology NPDES permit will be required and will specify the method of storm water control, treatment and monitoring during construction. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. Dust and combustion engine exhaust during construction. Automobile exhaust and wood smoke from fireplaces after home building. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odors that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Unknown c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Modern construction machinery will be employed in the performance of the work. Watering will be used to control dust during construction. Wood stoves, if used, will be of modern make and will meet current regulatory standards -4- [Ch.197-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3. Water a. b. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is one isolated wetland on the site. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. Homes, roads and utilities will be constructed within 40' of the wetland edge. 3. Estimate in the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities., if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Pollutants associated with typical urban residential developments may eventually make their way to surface waters. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No ground water will be withdrawn. Storm water discharged from the onsite -5- [Ch.197-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT detention/water quality facility may eventually recharge ground water. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any, (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Pollutants in storm water discharges from onsite treatment facilities typical for residential developments may eventually reach ground water. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (including quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water run-off from roofs, yards, driveways and streets will be directed by street gutters and yard drainage systems to catch basins and underground storm pipes. Run-off collected by the underground storm water pipes will be conveyed to an onsite detention pond and water quality treatment facility. Storm flows will be discharged at the natural points of the discharge. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe: Typical pollutants associated with urban residential developments could eventually reach surface or ground waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: A storm water system will be constructed to collect, convey and treat run-off generated from the site. The storm water detention and treatment facilities will be designed and constructed in accordance with the King County Drainage Manual and Department of Ecology standards. -6- [Ch.197-1 1 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULIES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X X X X X X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: fruit trees, cottonwood, evergreen tree: fir. cedar, pine, other: shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation (landscaping) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Land clearing typically associated with urban residential development activity will occur on the site including areas of typical Western Washington recent growth forest and pasture. This will include tree cutting, stump and undergrowth grubbing and removal and stripping of sod. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Yards will be landscaped using typical Pacific Northwest plantings. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawks, heron, eagle, son birds mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver h _ ~11~00.J rodents. coyotes fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other. -7- [Ch.197-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. Yard landscaping will provide habitat opportunities. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric and natural gas service will provide the primary sources of energy. Wood stoves and solar may be used as supplemental energy sources. b. Would the project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Land clearing may improve solar access by adjoining properties. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Modern home construction methods and materials will be employed to conserve energy. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control envir6nmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. -8- [Ch.1 97-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic on adjacent streets, barking dogs, EMV sirens, other noises typical to an urban residential environment. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. During land development there will be heavy equipment engine noise and noises associated with equipment maintenance. During home building there will be delivery truck traffic, nail guns and saws. After build-out there will be traffic noise on the internal streets and other noises typical to an urban residential environment. Construction noise will be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM Monday through Friday and 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM on Saturdays. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction equipment will be fitted with modern exhaust muffling devices and will be maintained in good working order. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties. Residential and pasture. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Unknown C. Describe any structures on the sites. One large home and several outbuildings. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? All of the outbuildings will be demolished. The existing home will likely remain. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-4 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation for the site? Urban Residential/4-12 Units per Acre. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. -9- [Ch.197-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes. A wetland has been identified. The wetland measures approximately 17,162 square feet and meets the criteria for a Class 2 wetland according to King County sensitive area codes. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed Project. Approximately 206 people. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. NA. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. The proposal complies with current comprehensive plans and is in character with future development proximate to the site. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income building. 75 units of middle income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: When completed the project will provide 74 new single family detached middle income homes. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 35 feet. Wood, brick, stucco. -10- [Ch.1 97-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views over or inward to the project site will be altered from forest and pasture to modern, well designed homes and landscaped yards. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. The project proposes 74 new, modern, well-designed homes and landscaped yards 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Automobile headlights and streetlights at night. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Glare from streetlights may interfere with the view of nearby residents of the night sky. Automobile headlights may cause temporary discomfort for oncoming drivers. c. What existing off-site source of light or glare may affect your proposal? Automobile headlights and street lights from adjacent streets. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. Street lights will be designed to minimize glare. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Undeveloped King County park land lies approximately 2000' west of the site. Maplewood Park is about 1 mile southwest of the site. Maplewood Heights park is .4 miles southeast of the site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. A minimum of 29,250 square feet of active and passive recreation space will be provided in conjunction with the project including a tot lot, large play apparatus and sport court. -11- [Ch.1 97-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No with regard to the subject site. Unknown with regard to adjoining properties. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. Not applicable. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is bounded on the north by SE 136th St, on the east by 154th Ave. SE and on the west by 1561h Ave. SE. Project access for the 75 lot R-6 zoning alternative is proposed via SE 136th St. from a single project entry/egress point. Project access for the 44 lot R-4 current zoning alternative is proposed from 160th Ave. SE from a single access point. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? King County/Metro provides transit service in the vicinity of the site. Routes 111 and 114 provide service along SE 1281h Street, SE 144th Street and 144th Avenue SE. The nearest bus stop to the proposed project is located on the southeast corner of 1561h Ave. SE./SE. 12S'h Street. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Approximately 300 off-street spaces would be provided for the single family homes utilizing driveways and garages. No spaces would be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to the existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Yes. Public interior plat roads will be required to provide neighborhood traffic circulation and access to the proposed residential units. Upgraded access to the site and frontage improvements may be required. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. -12- [Ch.1 97-11 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) SEPA RULES TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. According to the traffic report prepared for this project approximately 708 new trips per day would be generated. Peak volumes would occur during the AM and PM commutes with approximately 55 AM peak hour trips and 75 PM peak hour trips. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. Interior plat roads meeting King County Road Standards will be constructed to provide interior circulation. County Mitigation Payment System Fees (MPS) will be paid for each lot to mitigate offsite impacts to the regional County road infrastructure. Transit service to the site may reduce overall traffic impacts. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so generally describe. Yes. Population growth in the immediate vicinity due to the proposed project will require additional fire, police and emergency health protection. It is likely that some of the new homes will contain families with school-age children resulting in increased demand for education services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Mitigation fees, if required, will be paid on each individual unit. Portions of the property taxes paid by the home/lot owners will be targeted to the various public service providers. 1 6. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site; electricitv1 natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. CablelV. • -13- [Ch.1 97-11 RCW-p.40] SEPA RULES (1983 Laws) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT C. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. SIGNATURE Electricity and Natural Gas will be provided by Puget Sound Energy; Cable TV service will be provided by AT&T Broadband; Telephone service will be provided by Qwest. Sewer service will be provided by the City of Renton. Water service will be provided by King County Water District #90. Connections to the various service mains will be made at the project frontage on SE 136th St. and/or 160'" Ave. SE. Underground service will be constructed in conjunction with road and storm drainage construction activities. The above answers are true and complete to the best of knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on th to make its decision. Date Submitted: _ __:7._4<......:?c.a/<--..:::Zcc...c..:1,:;......_/_· ____ _ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale A venue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 STATE OF WASHINGTON } } ss COUNTY OF KING ). File Number:------------- ( Application Name: _......<:/:1:..=-V...,,'t:N"-'-'0:c..=&"7==£=------------------- Project Location: ~ 4f Sc. 1$6 ~, 7. .it.'7Wl:hy !Sb t,. A<,Y lE ,;/ //." 11 Ptve, SC,. The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says: 1. That the affiant is.competent to be a witness herein; 2. That the affiant is the applicant for the above project; 3. That to the best of the affiant's knowledge the sensitive areas on the development proposal site have not been illegally altered; and 4. · That the affiant has not previously been found to be in violation of sensitive areas regulations for any property in King County, or alternatively, that if there have been any violations, such violations have been/are being cured to the satisfaction of King County. · Date and Place (City and State) I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. UB g (d.:; :~ J.} 1·;: Ql WP/F0RMS/FORMS96/SOS$/AFF1DAVIT CONCERN SINSIT AREA COMP.DOC 4/6/99 CLC JL:L G -2:ni /_::V MAIN FILE COPY ® l@~~@@~ Transnation A L\NDAMERJCA COMPANY -TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 14450 NE 29TH PLACE SUITE 200 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98007-9926 Prepared for: CENTERIOR DEVELOPMENT 22617 8TH DRIVE SE BOTHELL, WA 98021 ATIN: MIKE ROMANO 2/1 Order Number: Seller: Buyer/Borrower: Your Reference No.: Loan Number: Order Summary 870890 Thank you for placing this order with Transnation Title Insurance. If you need assistance on this file, please contact: John W. Jones (425) 646-8589 johnjones@landam.com Mark S. Niklason (425) 646-8592 mniklason@landam.com Randy McCrory (425) 646-8590 rmccrory@landam.com J, Jay Pugh (425) 646-8591 jaypugh@landam.com 1-800-441-7701 Fax: ( 425) 646-8593 ' .. MAIN FILE COPY File No.: 870890 fi,· Transnation RE: SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE LIMITS OF LIABILITY AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HERETO ANNEXED AND MADE A PART OF THIS GUARANTEE, AND SUBJECT TO THE FURTHER EXCLUSION AND LIMITATION THAT NO GUARANTEE IS GIVEN NOR LIABILITY ASSUMED WITH RESPECT TO THE IDENTITY OF ANY PARTY NAMED OR REFERRED TO IN SCHEDULE A OR WITH RESPECT TO THE VALIDITY, LEGAL EFFECT OR PRIORITY OF ANY MATTER SHOWN THEREIN. TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation herein called the Company, GUARANTEES CENTERIOR DEVELOPMENT the Assured named in Schedule A against actual monetary loss or damage not exceeding the liability amount stated in Schedule A which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. DATED: June 25, 2001 at 8:00 am Transnation Title Insurance Company Authorized Signature Subdivision Guarantee TQ900WA (5/99) Page 1 of 9 Order No. Customer No. 870890 1. Name of Assured: CENTERIOR DEVELOPMENT 2. Date of Guarantee: June 25, 2001 at 8:00 am SCHEDULE A Liability: Charge: Tax: Total: The assurances referred to on the face page hereof are: File No.: 870890 $200.00 $200.00 $17.60 $217.60 That according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matters affecting title to the following described land: As fully set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part thereof. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in: ROBERT A. MAIR AND CLYDERAE MAIR, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS TO PARCEL A; AND DAVID A. NYBLOM AND DEBRA L. ALBISO, HUSBAND AND WIFE , AS TO PARCEL 8 subject to the Exceptions shown below, which are not necessarily shown in order of their priority. Page 2 of 9 Subdivision Guarantee SCHEDULE A -Continued File No.: 870890 EXCEPTIONS: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies or assessments on land or by the public records. 2. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown by the public records. 3. Title to any property beyond the lines of the land expressly described herein, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways on which said land abuts, or the right to maintain vaults, tunnels, ramps or any other structure or improvement; or any rights or easements therein unless such property rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in the land described herein. 4. GENERAL PROPER1Y TAXES and SERVICE CHARGES, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No.: l'.fil!.[ li.l.l.wl 2001 $2,220.89 142305-9022-07 fBill $0.00 Total amount due, not including interest and penalty: Levy Code: Assessed Value Land: Assessed Value Improvements: (Covers Parcel A and other property) 4350 $81,000.00 $91,000.00 Balance $2,220.89 $2,220.89 5. The 2001 County Tax Roll discloses that a mobile home is situate on the land herein described and is being taxed under personal property taxes as Account Number 39922612. Inquiry must be made for correct payment amount and procedure. (Covers Parcel A and other property) 6. The 2001 King County Tax Roll discloses that a mobile home is situate on the land described under the above referenced tax account, however it is not located on the land described in Schedule A herein. When the taxes are segregated upon subdivision, this note will be eliminated. Page 3 of9 Subdivision Guarantee SCHEDULE A -Continued FIie No.: 870890 7. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES and SERVICE CHARGES, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, If any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No.: ~ .llliwl 2001 $6,806.55 142305-9009-04 eii.1.11. $3,403.28 Balance $3,403.27 Total amount due, not including interest and penalty: $3,403.27 Levy Code: Assessed Value Land: Assessed Value Improvements: (Covers Parcel B) 6870 $208,000.00 $301,000.00 8. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDING NO.: KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 90, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION WATER AND SEWER MAINS NORTHERLY 30 FEET OF PARCEL B 7507170567 9. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDING NO.: KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 90 WATER AND SEWER MAINS WITH NECESSARY APPURTENANCES NORTHERLY 30 FEET OF PARCEL A 7507170570 10. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDING NO.: (Covers Parcel B) PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION ONE OR MORE ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION LINES AS CONSTRUCTED OR TO BE CONSTRUCTED, EXTENDED OR RELOCATED 9502230476 11. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon the land herein described as established in Volume 31, of Commissioner's Records, Page 415. ( Covers Pa reel B) Page 4 of9 Subdivision Guarantee SCHEDULE A -Continued File No.: 870890 12. ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS OR OTHER SERVITUDES, IF ANY, DISCLOSED BY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9508099008. RIGHTS OR BENEFITS, IF ANY, WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY THE RECORDED DOCUMENT(S) ABOVE AFFECTING LAND OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARY DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A. (Covers Parcel B) 13. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ADDRESS: LOAN NO.: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: (Covers Parcel B) DAVID A. NYBLOM AND DEBRA L. ALBISO, HUSBAND AND WIFE NORTHWEST FINANCIAL CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION FIRST SAVINGS BANK OF WASHINGTON P.O. BOX 907, WALLA WALLA, WA 99362 $203,150.00 JULY 21, 1995 AUGUST 1, 1995 9508010201 Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owed by contacting the appropriate lender/agency/individual. Page 5 of9 Subdivision Guarantee SCHEDULE A · Continued File No.: 870890 14. DEED OF TRUST SECURING A LINE OF CREDIT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ADDRESS: LOAN NO.: AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: DAVID A. NYBLOM AND DEBRA L. ALBISO, HUSBAND AND WIFE CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY KING COUNTY CREDIT UNION 801 SECOND AVENUE, SUITE 100, SEATILE, WA 98104-1510 $40,000.00 SEPTEMBER 12, 1997 SEPTEMBER 19, 1997 9709190341 NOTE: CAUTION SHOULD BE EXERCISED TO ENSURE THAT A RECONVEYANCE WILL BE OBTAINED, (Covers Parcel B) Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owed by contacting the appropriate lender/agency/individual. 15. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ADDRESS: LOAN NO.: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: (Covers Parcel A and other property) ROBERT A. MAIR AND CL YDERAE MAIR, HUSBAND AND WIFE FIDELITY MORTGAGE TRUSTEE SERVICE, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION IMC MORTGAGE COMPANY D/B/A COREWEST MORTGAGE COMPANY $122,000.00 JULY 18, 1997 JULY 31, 1997 9707311685 Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owed by contacting the appropriate lender/agency/individual. Note 1: The legal description of the land described herein is a portion of a County Tax Assessor's parcel. Conveyance of a portion of said parcel may violate RCW 58.17. Under the Exclusions from Coverage, any loss arising from such a violation is excluded from coverage. (Covers Parcel A) Page 6 of9 Subdivision Guarantee SCHEDULE A -Continued File No.: 870890 Note 2: The liability amount shown on Schedule A herein is a minimum because no specific liability amount was requested at the time the application for title insurance was made. Please contact your Title Officer if a greater liability amount is required, for which an additional fee will be charged. Note 3: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WITHIN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT. PTNS OF NW 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC 14 TWN 23 N RNG 5 E JLB/rr ENCLOSURES: Sketch Vesting deed Recorded encumbrances Page 7 of9 Subdivision Guarantee EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH V2 OF THE NORTH 'h OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M., LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 156TH AVENUE S.E. AS DEEDED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 1094243; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE WESTERLY 199 FEET THEREOF, AS MEASURED FROM THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 156r" AVENUE S.E., LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF; TOGETHER WITH A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILmES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE NORTH 15 FEET OF THE WEST 187 FEET (AS MEASURED FROM THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY) OF LOT 2 OF SHORT PLAT NO. 878133, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8002250639, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; ALSO TOGETHER WITH A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE SOUTH 15 FEET OF THE EAST 22 FEET OF THE WEST 199 FEET, AS MEASURED FROM THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 156TH AVENUE S.E., OF THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH V2 OF THE NORTH 'h OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 156TH AVENUE S.E.; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: THE EAST V, OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M.; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID EAST V2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 14 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID EAST 1h OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 25°21' EAST 523.99 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID EAST 'h OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 'I•; THENCE NORTH 88°07'58" WEST 653.61 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST V2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST V•; "" l ·= 4 a 3 ... ,1.~--------1 :,oei7 > • l_m__ A ~ • I i l • • .. ' -.-·-, LOT 2 .r .~ I t•l>·. ~I ._' <; \_ '!! ~ .... 5 ....... .,,-.., I ,.,.-., --1,. ·• n (' ,, B • ; r•••-.•i4 ~ ·~ • • (0 .. I I '1 *'-------,......,.-. ... r,'"',>-,•'"·---------l ~ ~-"' J 1 ;c ;:-,,,-----~f ""-''e.• '"""'"~~ !~e,,'!,;;e, '-----.::i •' ,, ' • (J} I ' • ' I I ~ ! KCSP 481066 -•18109100~03 •• J.JT/ ~: £•7Z ,; fl'·' .,. i· ," .. ~ ~· : . ' •• •: ~-.. .. . . • -~ . ~ l 1 • : '"'4'\. " .. : ... .. .. . . .. '; , .. : '\:: .. ,.:,.,.. --''c...,:, .. ·_,_,.,,.c,.~,.'!'?"-.•-...L..-----, .1'-'-""··----'~'-'-- This sketch is provided, without charge, for your information. It is not intended ID show all matt?rs related ID the property including, but not limited ID, area, dimensions, casements, en- croachments, or location of boundaries. It is not a pan of, nor does it modify, the commianent or 11>olicy 1D which it is al!llched. The Company assumes NO UABIUTY for any matter related ID this sken:h. References should be made 1D an accurate survey for further information. 1, SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE 1. Except to the exlent that specific assurances are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the foUowlng: {a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other maners against the title, whether or 001 shown by the public records. (b) (I) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessmems on real property; or, (2) Proceedings by a public agency which may result in laxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not the matters excluded under (I) or (2) are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the public records. (c) ( I) Unpatented mining claims: (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excluded under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records. 2. Notwithstanding any specific assurances which are provided In Schedule A or this Guarantee, the Company assumes no llablllty for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to any propeny beyond the lines of the land expressly described in the description set forth in Schedule (A), (C) or in Part 2 of this Guarantee, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways to which such land abuts, or the right to maintain therein vauils, tunnels, ramps or any structure or improvements; or any rights or easements therein, unless such property, rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in said description. (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, whether or not shown by the public records; (I) which are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the Assureds; (2) which result in no loss to the Assured; or (3) which do not result in the invalidity or potential invalidity of any judicial or non-judicial proceeding which is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provided. (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to in Schedule A. (d) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to in this Guarantee. GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS I. Deflnlllon of Terms. The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: (a) the "Assured": the party or parties named as the Assured in this Guaritntee, or on a supplemental writing executed by the Company. (b) "land": the land described or referred to in Schedule (A)(C) or in Part 2, and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "land" does not include any propeny beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule (A)(C) or in Part 2, nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, Janes, ways or waterways. (c) "mortgage": mortgage. deed of trust, trusr deed, or other security instrument. (d) "public records": records established under state statutes al Date of Guarantee for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of mailers relating to real propeny to purchasers for value and without knowledge. (e) "date": the effective date. 2. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Claimant. An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as slated herein, and which might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by vinue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then all liability of the Company shall tenninate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required: provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any Assured under this Guarantee unless lhe Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty 10 defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which the Assured is a party, notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or proceeding. 4. Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions; Duty of Assured Claimant to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 3 above: (a) The Company shall have the right, at its sole option and cost, 10 institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, interpose a defense, as limited in (b), or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee, whether or not it shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. (b) If the Company elects to exercise its options as stated in Paragraph 4(a) the Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of such Assured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Assured and shall 001 be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel, nor will the Company pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by an Assured in lhe defense of those causes of action which allege ma11ers not covered by this Guarantee. (c) Whenever the Company shall have broughl an action or interposed a defense as pemtitted by the provisions of this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in its sole discre1ion, to appeal from an adverse judgment or order. (d) In all cases where this Guaranree permits the Company to prosecute or provide for lhe defense of any action or proceeding, an Assured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecu1e or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company 10 use, at its option, 1he name of such Assured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, an Assured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecu1ing or defending the action or lawful acr which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. S. Proof of Loss or Damage. In addi1ion to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided to the Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company within ninety (90) days after the Assured shall ascenain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or darflage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of loss or damage and shall state, lo the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligation to such assured under the Guarantee shall 1erminate. In addition, lhe Assured may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of !he Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the Joss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Assured shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All infonnation designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oalh, produce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably oecessary information from third parties as required in the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. 6. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims: Termination of Liability. In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have 1he following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Llabili1y or to Purchase the Indebtedness. The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result in loss 10 the Assured wi1hin the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or, if this Guarantee is issued for lhe benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder, the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon, together with any costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the 1ime of purchase. Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall tenninate all liability of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers 10 purchase said indebtedness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness, together with any collateral security, to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph {a) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other 1han to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay or 01herwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the Assured Claimant. To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name ofan Assured claimant any claim assured against under this Guarantee, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incllll'Cd by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4. 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only lo the extent herein described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least of: (a) the amount of liability stated in Schedule A or in Part 2; (b) the amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, as limited or provided under Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations, at the time the loss or damage assured against by this Guarantee occurs, together with interes1 thereon; o, (c) the difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or interest subjecl to any defect, lien or encumbrance assured against by this Guarantee. 8. Limitation of Liability. (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures any other maner assured against by this Guarantee in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully perfonned its obligations with respect to that mailer and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTINUED ON BACK COVER CLTA Guarantee Conditions and Stipulations Form 2015-7 (Rev. 12-15-95) ORIGINAL CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTINUED (b) In the event of any litigation by the Company or wilh the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liabili1y for loss or damage until there has been a final ddemunation by a coun of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title, as stated herein. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any Assured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Assured in setlling any claim or suit without the prior written consenl of the Company. 9. Reduction ol Liability or Termination or Liability. All payments under this Guarantee, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liability pro tanto. 10. Payment of Loss. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement of the payment unless the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished 10 the satisfaction of the Company. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within 1hirty (30) days thereafter. 11. Subrogallon Upon Payment or SettlemenL Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee, all righ1 of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured claimant. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property in respect 10 1he claim had this Guarantee nol been issued. If requested by the Company, the Assured shall transfer lo the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this righ1 of subrogation. The Assured shall permit !he Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured in any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the Company shall be subroga1ed to all rights and remedies of !he Assured after the Assured shall have recovered its principal, interest, and costs of collection. "' ~ss ~ ...,- "' ~ ~ g 3 C) ~ u, 0. 0 ~ 0 .:, j:.~3 ~~ s~ A ~ 0 z i~ ~ ~ £· ;i 1:aai m ~;;? > C/1 z ~~ j§ ~ C . . p ~ ~ ~":.< 8 a: ~~ n !@ m i ~ ~ n 0 < ~ ~ 0 • • 12. Arbitration. Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the Assured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association, Arbitrable maners may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relating to this Guarantee, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a Guarantee provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Liabili1y is SI ,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured. All arbitrable mancrs when 1he amount of liability is in excess ofSI,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect al Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state in which the land is localed penni1s a coun to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitra1or(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall a_pply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 13. Llabl!Uy Limited to This Guarantee; Guarantee Entire Contract. (a) 'This Guarantee together with all endorsements, if any, anached hereto by the Company is the entire Guarantee and contracl between the Assured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of 1his Guarantee, this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, or any action assening such claim, shall be restricted to this Guarantee. (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a writing eodorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either lhe President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 14. Notices, Where Sent. All notices required to be given the Company and any slatement in writing required to be furnished the Company .~hall include the number of this policy and shall be addressed to: Consumer Affairs Department, P.O. Box 27567, Richmond, Virginia 23261-7567. ~ C'.l ~ i 0 ~,1 ~ .,, c::: "' § ~ ~ 0 0 z z (JJ 0 a 0 z (JJ '. ··, ~i \ I ! T~ANSAME!UCA /!, TITLE INSURANCE FUD FOR RECORD AT REOUW OF WMIN A!COl'OID RlfURN TO ......... -........ -.............. _ ....... _ ............ . Tr.ummcrid j llHS SPACEPROVIO&O FOR RECOAOER'S USE: r 1idc Insur.ma: Comr:inJ' l ... :,; .. ,: \';Ud!: !:~·.1 ti::-;;!~; :.:·-~~:L (,.1'.,ii';,i !'.( :-· .:J i l;;'.lh f,:,:. 1.J.E.l . ~-~\j:( i.<•; 1 ' ' i ! I DEC 261989 ! ' 106015 1 99, 12-'26 tt07S9 ;,.' I> REC!) F ,5,00 ) l . "----RESIOEllI1AL ~~.n.x:·,.-·----··~-·1 24837 -104th Ave SE ilOJA JJ,~i!1 I RECFEE 2, 00 i CASHSL ,.......,.*?,00 • 55 : ·············-··-··-········ .. ---·-.. ·---. ! ~ ......,___ ~j~ 9 WA 98031 __ •. ------·-···-.. ·- I j l ! .I l .i 1 i :1 I ["' Cltf, Slat,,Zlp. ____________ ,,_., ________ _ 0 CD N N '"4 (fl (l) THE OR.\NTOR Statutory Warranty Deed T1D1AS M. BEVAN and MARGARET M, BEVAN, husband and wife TEN CXXLARS ($10.001 and all other good and valuable amsideration ; lnlumdpiud.cmi-.eramndwarrantat.o RceEllT A. MA.IR and a.YIEU\E MAill, husband and wife ~ tho followias dMcribed tftl ed4W. situated in lho County ol King , Statoof Waahiqtoa.: 0., THE NCIIT!I \ a! THE HCJml I OF THE Nam!WEST I a! TIii: tmrHWEST I OF THE soorm:AST I W SEC1'I~ 14, tomship 23 ?K.Rl'ff, RANGE 5 £AST, W.M.: EXCEPT 'fflE WEST 30 FEEr a:fflEYEI) 10 KIN:. COON1'Y IN DEED RECaUl£O UNmR RB:CJU>ING II). 10942431 . SIT!ll\l'E IN THE COUNrl( OF KING, S'!ATE OF WASHilllI'OII, =il!2I Wl'l'II fl.xtun, of 1975 Silch 68x36 M>bile Hane, serial N:I. 5248 together with &ll appirtenanCeS thereunto- SUBJE::?TO: l. Easanent 1n ~avor of 1C1ng county Watnr District for water and sewer main i:ecorded under Recording MO. 7507170570. ~:; IW,d.. ____ Po<enbe>: .. 15 ... -· ..... ,i,89 .. ~- f)~E :.: ·: ~· : -·.;. •· $? n ·~ -. ..., '" --.,; '-" ,. ... " "' :;; ~ . C' .. ;;; .. ?: ~&-~ ~e.t~,_:&G!.,--- ··----...... ···-__ .. ___ ---·--·--- ~o:r:· .. :., .-.. ,_c;,,'•~..-;,.1;~it,7, bofoM ... ~:.'i' l!e'la,> "'f~t H. Bevan io ... knGft'lD bG tho indlm:IIW deac:ribN:l la. and * ~kllo\irii.hln GIid fanaalnc \MtNIIIOftl. .:Mil ackaowleqa{'~·:..tm.y_.j .. tho--· L ... ~'.......ttmr.~:,,.., *' 'IOhta.J,. 11n onc1 deed. Car t,-.uaa ,,d.~ theraia.mtatlDned. "" ··-~ \ ~· _j,;. .. ··-····-· ·-· ·-··· ... --··--.. ·-·---------- STATE OF WASHINCTON _J -. COUNTY OF----- .,.,: a!::'~~': N,14r7 Public 1n u.11 t,, t111 s~ :""weii= 1..-. dwJ ~ &ad •-m. pononallJ' Gl)Ptllftd---- MAI \I FILE COPY - ---·-. '' -· 0 5~091ll·Q20C 01101!100 M KING tn\lNl'i RECORDS 1111 PHI 7.00 ... , "' .... ' ... ir" ' . First American Title Insurance Company Filrd for Record nl ltequeal nr · Name DAVID A. HYBLOK and DEBRA L. ALBJ.SO Addre1111 ___,l"'3"'6"'0"'6'-"l"'5"'8.=th"'-'A'-'v"e"-'S°'."E".'-----···------ City ond Stote Renton. WA 98059 THIS SPACE PAOVIOED FOR RECORDER'S USE: ~ Quit Claim Deed I THE GRANTOR DAVID A. NYBLOH, as hb separate estate In ror ond in cnnJ11iderntiun or GI.Fr OF LOVE AND AFFECTION TO ESTABLISH MARITAL COMMURITY INTEREST C, conveyR ond quit dnimR to DAVD> A. H!BLOK and DEBRA L. ALBJ:SO. Husband aud wu:e the followinR ducribed real r11tale, !litunted in the Counly oC toi\:ethcr with oil nrtu acquired tiUc of lhe Kntntor(11) I.heroin: UJIC St.Ate of WaahinKton, ri \ KB EAST JUU,F OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE 80UTHEA$T QUARTER OF SECTION l.4, ~~ OWNSHIP lJ ttORTH. RANGE 5 EAST. WJ:Lt.AMSTTE MSRIDIAH, IN kINC COUNTY, NASH1NCTON; .;.1 ~ XCS:PT THAT PORTIOH OF SAW EAST RALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER. OF THE SOUTHEAST ;;1, 'ARTEa. OF' SAID SECTI0ll 1.& DSSC:RIDED AS FOLLOKS 1 0~ EC:IHHING AT THE SOUTHEAST COR!nm OF SAID BAST KALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUAATER OF '•J ~ 1 HE SOtrrHEAST QUARTER AS THE POI?ff' OF TRUE 'SEGXNNING I f2 ":::l' HEHCE HORTH 25•21' EAST 52]. 99 FEET ALOH'l TH£ EAST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE '-::. rORTHWEST OUAJtTER OF TUE sotrrHEAST QUARTER: :·.f .'.'JTH1!:1'1CE fJORTH aa•o"7•Sa'" NEST G"Sl.Gl FEET TO THE: WEST LtUE OF SA%D EAST HALF OF THE l.l:'rroRTHWE'ST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER: THE:JCE SOt.rrH 0•27•os" WEST S25,82 FEET TO THE SOUTH LIHE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE t:OR.T~WEST QUAR'tER OF THB SOlJTHE;\ST QUARTEP.; TREHCE SCt.rnl aa•17•JS .. !.AST 653.84 FEET A.I.ONG THS SOUTH LUJE OP' SAID EAST HALF OF THE fJORTHWEST QUAATER OF' fflE SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO THE TROE pOINT OP BEGI1:lt1ItlG, AND EXCEPT COtnlTY' ROA.OS. ?:Iltny Zlat ~ _. 19 95 O "· ~!-+-------------ll-Y--~--~------~------~----~-------,-,-~:-,-,a:.:.-,-,::::::::::::::::::~ lly ______________________ _ IS..:·rwt.aryl ,.. ~_,,.._,,.. ............. "' ... "' ..., STATI-: ot· \VASIIINf:'"rON _J -~~~~Ul"f'~\'"(ARHINOTON _J It.ING • ...c-~~ ~ ........ ";.~~ •• l'f.• • ' 1..: ,·oUNTY o, ___ .____ _ 1'"9:'r~ou...., .... 61'_ _ ___ . __ On 1hl• day l"•nnnally 11r,1:;:;d ~-;on• m• f Q:) \\OTAJa;{hl •_).., d•J' or ____________ ,, __ _ Davi.d A. N bl01ll z --tJ«cR\l'tn•. I , u •n11Md. • Nntar,-P•bhc In •nd rarche Stal• of w .. h1111ron. dulJ' com- --· · --· ._Y_ ···-·---------·-f~~ :;.. PlJB~d 14=-''"· (H'r!<onally 111111rnrll'd ·-• ·-• __ tn""" knro•n t,; h• th~ in1hv1dua11,., ·,l•ut1tM.'d m .. rlf_~ •,!.";--1-::!.. . .....:·~-{.:':/----···----------------·-------- PU'"-'l•d lhc, .,,,hm •nd foruolnc in1INm,n1. '-W~c~ ... : · _ •' -------------------------- uknowt•dltd th•I be • _ 11tpNI ~ .. ..:;,'-\.\,'Uril.·~.;.. 10 ba1M __ . --·-··-_l•rw•id•nt ,,.s _______ s-....,.. •• •. J1J..~ ····--· __ fr,r• onol volun1ery 11c-l and de.d, ntllf"'l"liw•ly, of ---·-·· ... ·-·· fur lh• m••• i1nd 11111'1""""" 1 h•r,in m•ntinnrd. If,• carpnralinn lh11l ••Hu led lh• forepin1. ln11tn:im•nl. •nd .cltnowl•d1ed 1h11 .atd lnal.nl• ···--······--·----· -------- Hy oppo~ntmenC e•pirea: 1/1/97 m•nt In h• lh• fr•• ind wnlunt11ry 11ct nnd dffd 11( 11111d irn,pnration. fnr lhlP u .. ,. and pupo1111 th.,•in m,rnth•RNl."11nd nn uath •t111td thlll -----------,,-,---------- authoriHd IUHIPNl1' lh• ~id in,1ruru,n1 and that th• q11l11Uiud ia th1c:upor11l1tHololaokt cv,amr•tio.on. Wltn••• f!IY hancl 111111 nfl1d,l •ul tt.N"ln •lfi•ed th• day ,nd yHr lir•l •bow• written. -------------·-----. ------------- :'.. . . -: . -. ' ) , ---~~ _..,_. 0 0 0 0 . VI "' ' .. "' ' r- 0 0 "' "' 0 .. ... ~ ... 1 I I \ ·1 j 1 1 t ., l .l l ,j 1 ~ ~-. .. • -I ' \ •• .J -TIil$ AGREEMEIIT made 19.li._, l>y and between thill __._t ... 5._J:!!. __ doy of /'1.A-y P«au: L. ond , hio wife, horeinafter called •erantora•, and King County Water Diotrict No, 90, a municipal corporation of King County, Wanhington, horelruifter called •erantee.• e1fflESSETI11 That oaid Crantor(s), for valuable conoideration, do(eo) by thooe presents grant, bargin, aell, convey ond conficm unto the ooid Grantee, its succesaors, or asoigns, a right•of•way or ease• 1112nt for Water and Sewer Hains with necessary appurtenances over, through, across and upon the following described property situated in King County, Washington, particularly deocribed as follows, A PERMANENT EASEHENT deocribed ao tho Nortlwrly 30 feat of the E\ of tho~\ of tho SEk of Section 14, Townohip 23 North, Rmlao 5 Eoot, W,M,, leoo County Road, rHc ,R.:iMCl.'Ft) 8 'It' r,1£ C=,£A.Vn5'=. /'l t r#e. G,RAIII Ttl/f!.5 .. P.J.£D for Record , at He!;uest :,f r B c' £n, l k C (•,-..A,~ QM;;m •• Record Owner, Roger L, Chandler Easelll8nt No, 14•23·5·6 19650 108th Ave. s.E. Renton, Washington 98055 • ; I _,) -) That said CL"antee shall have che right without prior institution of any suit or proceeding at law, at cimss as may be necessary, co enter upon said propercy for the purpose of constructing, repairing, alcering, or reconscructing said Water or Sever Hain, or making any connections therewith, without incurring any legal ob!igation or lia• bi11ey therefor, provided that such conscructing, repairing, alterirg or reconstruccing of said Water or Sewer Hain shall be accomplished I.JI ouch a 1118JU18r that the private l.mprovemsnts existing in this riGht•of-ay shall not be disturbed or deap:oyed, or 1n Cl".e. 'lWi!.'l!= Chsy are diaturbed or dearroyed, they will be replaced in ad"!ibod a condition ao they were imm:adiately beforo Chs proparcy vao entered upon by the Grantee. 11w Grantor shall recain the right to use che surface of said eooolll3nt, so long aa said use doss not interfere with the 1nacalla• tlon and maintenance of che Water and SBV3r Hain and ao long ao no parmanent buildings or ocructures are erected on said eaaelll3nt. This easement shall be a covenant running with the land and ahall be binding on the oucceooors, hou·a,. and aooigns of both PQrtiea hereto, ·· :· -· · - STATE OF WASHINGTON) ~ ss COUNTY OF KlNG 1, the undersigned, a notary public in a~for the Scatt of \laehington, hereby cert~ that on this 1£/L day of H•;«- ---------,.-• 19 , personally appeared before 1119 " Rd~r 4. ciuJJ.;, and 1¥.,,11 H cl111~c . to 1113 known to be the individuals descri~in end vno executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that chey signed and sealed the 881113 as their free and voluntary act and deed·, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, eJ:a?T .. ,~ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at S" ea#'k, k/.4 . ----------------· 1?.&.1.gt1g11x mu AGllZEKi?Jl'i' lillldo ci:alo ·· 1/,3.f · ~~;, .. '/'f.;...;...a..,!i,Jt__. __ _,,. 1,u-.-1,y'~ ;;,~~-Jg,,,-1 'B. AA..J .· ad rq,.;Gs~ l( · 11,,,..,,~ · ,,::;>: · .. ·.~. 'liiM>C odd GrllnCor(o), for valuabls CCl3Wlderad.on, do(oo) by giwoo preooncs aranc, barslll, ooi.1., c-,, aJld comfum unco dlS oof.4 Granceo, I.co ouccouo..ro, or lllO&lpg. o rigbc•ofottay or 0000° iz:msc for \lacer "nd So""&-ffllll.l·.o ~1&:11 nocoo11ary appurconancoo <Nor, dlrouaho acrooo llnd upon t:,o f.olloving doocrl.bad propsrey o1cuocod iA lt1ltg Councy, lfooh1Jigce.a, ~clculorly cloocrlbod oo .foUoi,o, ·.;; .. -·/:...::..-, (~ <~ f..._., •• f ") "' y ..... ~ .... ~ .-l<---. /:-"" t. • ·• '!: _, -{._ r ,....; /!, V ,~ . .:::[,,., ~ ·....:....c.__ I ~I, k ,&:' .. /., e .. ,,,/ ,:. .. ·~a'.__ / .•. ilocord Ownor, Royal a. itorcb Za"""'3nc ffo, 14•23•5•5 1 5021 S,lf. Da11son Scrooc Soacclo, lfaebln3con· 98116 I : .. ,. 0 '· / <> FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: PUGET POWER -OR II Ga N AL RCAL ESTA Tl: DEPARTMENT _. B ft P.O. BOX 970.14 RF.LLEVUE. WASHINGTON 98009·9734 EXCISE T I\X MOT r.~QUIRF.D . · ') .. t'"P. c,, Record~ ON1S1uri EASEMENT ' -.-::::::. ./ .u.v,..... . o,c·,11 and Debra A lbiso B . For end in consideretion of One Dollar (S1 00) and Otho, valuable considorallon, thtt recei~t of which le hereby acknowlodgod. DAVID A. NVBLOM.Jadxmmllmed:»e:maA raranto,.. horCHn), hereby granLD. canvoyu and warrants to PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a WallKngton ea,po,at1on C"Grontoe" herein), ror the purposes hor0tnaner Ht fortt,. a perpetual easement over, across and under the fallOW1ng detChbed real property (the "Proper1y" hcretn) 1n KING COUNTY, Washington SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 'A' Excopt as may be othorw110 set .rarth he,~n Grantoe'a tight. shall bo oxardlDd upon that portion or tho Property (lhe-Rlghl•of.Way'" heratn)doscnbed a~ follows A R1ght-ot-Way ten (10) feet in width having five (5) feet ot such width on each side of a centertina descrioed as follow, TKI! CENTERLINE OF GRANff.E'G FACtUTIES AS CONSTRUCTED OR TO BE CONSTRUCTED. EXTENDED OR Rl!LOCATeo, LYING WITfflN THE ABOV£ DESCR1BED PROPl!RTY. 1. Purpooe. Grantee shall have the right to canstruct. oparata, maintain, repair, replace and enlarge on• or moro eteetnc 1ran1mlsalon and/or distribution Jines ovat and/or under the Right-or-Woy logother with an necnury or convenient appurtenances theaeto, which may indude but are not limited to the foDowing· a. Oworhead rocllltlaD. P01n and/Or towen with crassarrns. braCOII, guys and anchors, elec:lnc transmission and distribution 11nes; communialion and signal linn; transformers. b. undorgraund focllltlea. Undefground CMd\llts, cabtn. 'VD\dts.. manholes. switches and translotmera; semi-buried or ground mounted fadlmn such as pads, tnnsformllf'I and switches. Follaw1ng th'i initial con1lruct1an of 1t1 laciht.ies, Grantoe may from lime to tlma canstruct IUch DddlUonal hnes and other faci!IUol as 1t may requite. 2. Accoao. Grantee ehall have the right of access to Iha Right-of-Way rNer end acraH the Propltfty to enabl• Grant" to exordao Its rights hereundltl', provided. lhot Granttta lhaU compansate Gfantor for anr damago to the Property caused by the mcerctsa at 1ald right ot access 3. Cutting of Treeo. Grantae shall have the nght to cut or trim any and all bNsh or troea standing or growing upon the Rlght-ot-Wny. and also the rtghl to cut or ltim any trea upon tno Property which. in falling, could in Grantee's reasonable Judgment, ba a hozard lo Granlae·, flldlitln. 4. Grantor"D t..,ae of Rlght-ot•Way. Gr.:snt"Jr rin-=l"WOl lho noht to uso lho Rlghl-c>f.\1\'ay for any purpo1a not incat1sistent with the nghts h81'e1n granted. prCMdad. thal Gfantor Shaft not construct or mamtaln any bu1ld1ng or other structure on the Righ,,01-Way and grantor sh11ll do no blasting Within 300 feat of Grantoo'a laclUllos wilhout Granlee's prior wr1nen consent s. lndomnlty. By accepbng and recording this easemont. Grantee ag,oes to Indemnity and hold harmless Gn:mtor from any and alt claims for lnJurlos and/or damaaes suffered by any parson. whlCh may be caused by the Grant-·, exerciso of tho rights herein grantoct provided, that Grantee lhoU not bo rosponsibto to Grantor for any Injuries and/or damagOG to any paraon caused by Oct~ or omlnions of Gtantor . a. Abandonment. The rights he,ein granted shall cantinuit until such time as Gtont1e coases to use the Righi-of-Way for a period at fl'Vo (5) succenivD years, In ~Ch event 1h11 easemant shall terminate and aH rights hereunder shall reY81l to Gtantor, provided, u,at no abandonment snail be dlflffled to have occurred by reason of Granteo·s foilure lo 1ni00Jly tnstan Its tacttlttn on tho Right-at-Way witnln any pot'lod of timo rrom tno data haroor. 7, succeoaor ond Aaalgna. The rights and obligaUons of lhe pillties shall Inure to the benefit or and be binding upon their r~pecttve 1ucco11ors and assigns. 708.JO 2.a.4 JH • AC001195D1'65 • rnQC 235-56 £))...,.Lil( --.~·----- " ! () u ., I I" • I I( IJ ll!'I' ' I ~ " • •II I. •,'·I I" !•· J 't 11 ~,·!h -Ill ~ l ( ~~Ii l 111 i ! I ! i mil 11111! I Hi r"1 Ii, I I' 11 r r 1 ,, • , , 1:-:1 1 111 , • q 11 w1,1111u: 1·11 1 I i l i 1111 l !',·!Ii , 1u r 11 1 ~ I' i 1 ''" , • • , , 111 i •I , , , ~" ; I ·h1 1,, ill fl l I I l 1111 ; ,i!•[i I I I il • i I '!·1,1 • , 1•1. I I ; 1111 I •1 1 1 •, • ·, · 1 l ' . I I I I • • I f T ' . I . .,.,. J ... I • ij ! ! 1 '1' I 111~1 I I 1,111 ! !II ! ·, 11' I ,,,,1, I ,,·!•, I l •i•~ I l'rJ .. 1 1 , iji I .,11 I i , , ! ii !•l!il I I · ' ! I '111!1 11111 '·11 11111 ,: ,.. i I I ·I Cl I ipH IJIII 1.iu 1,.1 1 II I . ' l l llll ' . I • I I ~ ~ i I 'I!~~~~ ~ I ,., r r 111 I I J!f I I !I I t I• I I • I • GI ! • c r -.. •I HHli •11!ii ii 11 l l I I I ! ' f .. I" I ·1 •I I • Uth i I ! i I I ! l ' ~- ~ #" • ' I • f ' \ l l i. i ! c:::=.a!;:• "' "' lJ i :u tij n, r-~ i "' ~ "" I :u ;:;J --<; ~ '"" :z: lJ I r; t--< ~ 0, -! "' ~!<., ) j • 1~1<vt.SE "' IHE. NORTI1 10 ~-t::E.l OF ,.IHE. Wt.::il H~f ~t.t.l .~A::S Mt:A::sUKt.U tKUM IHt. t.A::Slt.KLY MAKulN Ut l,;UUNIT KUAU RIGHT-OF-WAY) OF LOT 2 OF SHORT PLAT NO. 878133, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8002250639, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. - !3 m TOGETHER WITH A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE SOUTH 15 FEET OF THE EAST 22 FEET OF THE WEST 199 FEET, AS MEASURED FROM THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 1S6TH AVENUE SE, OF THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 156TH AVENUE SE LEGEND-EXISTING 8 MONUMENT FOUND THIS SURVEY 0 FOUND PROPERTY CORNER AS INDICATED O SET REBAR & CAP LSf 6226 A SET PK & TAG LS# 6228 & ELECTRIC METER Q, POWER POLE -o-UTILITY POLE -GUY ANCHOR IZJ PHONE OR CABLE PEDESTAL Q FIRE HYDRANT M WATER VALVE 'g WATER METER II CATCH BASIN OR INLET !ID' GAS METER •ft~ DECIDUOUS AS DESCRIBED -E -OVER HEAD ELECTRIC LINES EDGE OF PAVEMENT -X-CHAIN LINK OR WIRE FENCE -o-WOOD FENCE -W-WATERLINE -SO-STORM DRAIN I I I I I I I/// I BUILDINGS ) C CULVERT -454-CONTOUR LINE NOTES: LEGEND-PROPOSED 111 WATER METER IXl WATER VALVE' 1.H.FIRE HYDRANT .:c,..., WA TE:R TEE ~~ W/ CONC. BLOCKING o CATCH BASIN 0 MANHOLE o CLEANOUT [ CAP PROPERTY LINE (PROPOSED) -·-·-·--·-LOT LINE (PROPOSED) [R j-· ·,ID ;;~ ;-c :1 D 1 .' '..' :_ G -2;JD/ I '( " .......... ·-"" r .1,,.;. u.u.i::.0. --EXISTING LOT LINE/ROW 1. BUILDINGS MARKED WITH AN * WILL BE DEMOLISHED . .. ;.i;i.li ~,, .. ,.# •• " ,_ :IJJ!• ... ,-.;' 'fi',£;,, ,.,,.-',, __ _ I, - DRYCO TOPOGRAPHY BY GEORGE W. DRYSDALE, P.L.S. DRYCO Surveying & Mapping 12714 VALLEY AVENUE EAST SUMNER, WASHINGTON 98390 (253) 826-0300 FAX (253) 826-9703 I PLAT OF EVENDELL LO~ P@Vll~ I SCALE: 1 "=100' 11 75 LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT 11 DRAWN BY: MJR I I DATE: 5/29/01 I I I RE.VISED: PREPARED FOR: U.S. LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 22200. SEATTLE. WA 98122-0200 CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 22617 -8TH DR. SE., BOTHELL, WA 98021 (425) 486-2563 OFF. (425) 486-3273 FAX SHEET 1 OF 1 1'k4/ Cf) (}ti,, 11 . , " fY,IAIN FILE COPY i.. - I r ' . ' i4 ~ i S 136TH ST ... SE 128TH ST ST VICINITY MAP - ~.. LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP NORTH. RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMEITE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER v, SAID SECTION 14 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AS THE POINT OF TRUE BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00"25'21" EAST 523.99 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88" 07'58" WEST 653.61 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 00"27'05" WEST 525.82 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 88'17'35" EAST 653.84 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTE:R TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT COUNTY ROADS. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 156TH AVENUE SE AS DEEDED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 1094243; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE WESTERLY 199 FEET THEREOF, AS MEASURED FROM THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 156TH AVENUE SE, LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. " . 0 C} l l lll. '-·~ ' . J I -J I ; i 'I! l.~H • I ,., 1 r 111 I I l!I I I ! I I ; l• j I ,, . 'I I • I I .•. h •I r r HII i I I !, l I I •t i i!· ll 1 I I ~ • I Ir r• r 'I •I I • f ·1· : 111 ' I I i i 8 IJl "' I) ::0 t%j ~ rri r-~ IJl ~ ... ~ ~ I ::0 ~ -< ~ "' C2: I) I i;: t°"" ~ -I "' , __ ,--- • 1716 , •= I I LEGEND EXISTING 0 MONUMENT FOUND THIS SURVEY 0 0 FOUND PROPERTY CORNER AS INDICATED SET REBAR & CAP LS# 6228 A SET PK & TAG LS# 6228 £ ELECTRIC METER Q POWER POLE --0--UTILITY POLE ,._ GUY ANCHOR l8J PHONE OR CABLE PEDESTAL (j FIRE HYDRANT &,, WATER VALVE @' I/IA TEA METER II CATCH BASIN OR INLET lQJ GAS METER •!fj,: DECIDUOUS AS DESCRIBED -E -OVER HEAD ELECTRIC LINES EDGE OF PAVEMENT -x-CHAIN LINK OR WIRE FENCE -o-WOOD FENCE -W-WATERLINE -SD-STORM DRAIN 1,111111,,1 BUILDINGS )-== -454-- NOTES: LEGEND-PROPOSED Ill WATER METER 1X1 WATER VALVE 1.H.FIRE HYDRANT lr'1 WATER TEE W/ CONC. BLOCKING D CATCH BAS/N 0 MANHOLE o CLEANOUT [ CAP PROPERTY LINE: (PROPOSED) -·-·-·-·-·-LOT LINE: (PROPOSED) 1. BUILDINGS MARKED WITH AN * WILL BE DEMOLISHED. I I SCALE: 1"=100' 11 I DATE: 5/29/01 I PREPARED FOR: DRYCO ToPoG~RMY ,LB;c : -..:, [ID GEORG~ 1W•.)IDRYSDALE, P~Y-V D R¥CD. ~ -2:i01 1 Survey:\1:tg. ~.)M:~pping 12714 VALLEY AVENUE EAST SUMNER, WASHINGTON 98390 (253) 826-0300 FAX (253) 826-9703 PLAT OF EVENDEL1l© ~rPOOD!!@I 44 LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT 11 DRAWN BY: MJR I I REVISED: I U.S. LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 22200. SEATILE. WA 98122-0200 CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 22617 -8TH DR. SE., BOTHELL, WA 98021 (425) 486-2563 OFF. (425) 486-3273 FAX SHEET 1 OF 1 o(J [JLi l ,--... ' t,lL MAIN FILE COPY-.---~ - ~ i S 136TH ST LL.I en .... SE 1281H ST VICINITY MAP 1,1 ~ SITE~ s ~ .... ST .... l!.l,""J" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMmE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNlY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14 DESCRIBED AS FOL.LOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AS THE POINT OF TRUE BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00°25'21" EAST 523.99 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88' 07'58" WEST 653.61 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 00'27'05" WEST 525.82 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 88°17'35" EAST 653.84 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT COUNlY ROADS. ' f' ' a i) 0 ~ei~-::z ofDevelopmeP and Environmental Services ::.~~~~·~~~~":;~~" Fire District Receipt Fire District #~~"----':5'"----- Name of Project/ Proposal __ ..::$,.=--.::~.,,;o..='0"-"'E...,L..:=L..=------------------------- Location of Project/ Proposal S:,v+i. tf $1: 13'1. c,>r .if;m.,.,w ~, :f'.;w, sc d-/bbt111v.i.. se. (Address, parcel number, tax account number, legal description)* •one of these required for processing of application ~ (Al< :T..J,;,I JJ(.Pb 1s, b!M{~£ (/1/z..JD!;-fozz) ¢ /~ SEC ______ _ 2.3 lWN ______ _ RNG. _ __,,()'-'S°,,,__ __ _ KROLLPAGE _ __:e:J~/=-/ __ _ Name of Applicant /), S. Lft,.IL) 0£. VELDf"µ(NT A"oe,'A;zz< QD ,?,/;:."""/IITVtr.,'0,-1 l}:tY£lu/'H£N1 $EJZV,"ee:$ Address of Applicant zz,n -8° At< ,SF, ,. ,&, p/1!1.L ,· M4 9fozl Telephone Number &z~) 'If b -UU Description: Type of Project/ Proposal Check appropriate box(es) D Apartment/ Multifamily D Commercial / Industrial ORetail D Residential: Single Family Residence 0Duplex Jl1 Subdivision D Short Subdivision / Short Plat lil'Rezone D Conditional Use D Unconditional Use D Planned Unit Development D School / Classroom OOther (describe) ______________________________ _ D Storz couplings required on Fire Hydrants Issuance of this receipt does not imply an approval, dis.approval nor review of referenced project/ proposal. This re:~J~ shall be valid for 30 days from date of signature. Q , L " . 'Af:1-A if JS: ~lll'J~SLC.. !Jd~ ~ -k4 /S~i ~n ',,<oLry"j:.Na~m~~,__:C....=-· _ _.:O:.._fR::,.._-::'.'.:J.:::.,1:_-~0~- Title Date Distribution: White: Applicant (see below) Yellow: King County Building Services Division Pink: Fire District Note Applicant: at the time of application to DOES the white copy must be presented with project / proposal submittal. 0178 (Rev. 9/97) Fire District: mail yellow copy to: King County r i_; 0 ) i : I -0 Building Servlces·oivision · ·/ 0 LI L· .. ., ~ 900 Oakesdale Avenue,.~ ~ -2:01 · Renton, WA 98055-1219 Attn: Fire Engine&'lnf;, D.D.~.D. MAIN FILE COPY UofF@Ub @ , ..... ' Jesse Tanner, Mayor CTI'TI'"1tlt JF lRIEN'TI'<O N Planning/Building/Publ_ic .Works Department Gregg Zlmmerman.P.E., Administrator , ,. ,,, . ' , ' .~. ,p, • 'SANITARY SEWER AV ~~ ~BILITY FOR SIN(; LE FAMILY R')ENTIAL BUIUHN(; CITY OF RENTON 1055 S Grady \Vay, Renton. \VA 98055 Phone: (425) 430-7200 Fax: (425) 430-7300 TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT: Date of Request .s/ ~ Applicant's Name: ,/.~~~~ Phone No &gz}4;:/,-z&6 Mailing Address: ~~-______j:/,___ _ ~ _p.i;ti!Yt~ ~ 77?(7-6we.;€. City §~ / State W/f-Zip Code ~/ Check one: Proposed Single Family Home Existing Single Family Home On Septic /~ Other (Specify) G~ ~l('/$M;./ Location/Address: ~zy' Ir z-~z2&z:r0EP:4' /Sb171,1v../£ o'-/BJzy'~ King County Tax Account No: ~~ ~t:)59..,Lz{?pr-tfF '7t:1Z7-, Legally Described as: 6e/L~ THIS APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE A COPY OF THE PROPOSED SITE/PLOT PLAN. INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CITY: I. 2. 0 Sanitary Sewer Service will be provided by side sewer connection only to an existing size --- sewer main located within -------------------------- City records show a side sewer stub to the property D Y O N or O Sanitary sewer service will require an extension of approximately ------------- or D 0 f ___ size sewer main located within-------------------~ The proposed development lies within -------------service area; therefore, the applicant shall contact The District/Agency at (phone) for sewer avJi\abiliry. See anached Jetter <lated --------------------------- Payment of all applicable system development fees: (Fees are subject to chani,e without notice) -System Development Charge: -Residential.building sewer pennit: -Latecomers special Jsses ment fel!s: i;;&.2'.:,6,i~~~;g_2;!/Q__ $ 760 $ 60 per single f~Hnily residence Per sin°le familv resiJen..:t! ~ . (nHr) . '' ~ • '· ' Sanitary Sewer Availability Form Page2 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. fl D )( D or)( 'p:. or D J( or D Reference data --~~=-"~"''--"'"""="""~c....Jl~"""=~a:;c,,..-"'5<...... _____________ _ Applicant shall abandon the existing septic system in accordance with Section 1119 of the current Uniform Plumbing Code and Section 4-6-040.1.6 of the City Code. Customers connecting to sanitary sewers in King County, including Renton's Sewer Service Area, after February I, 1990, are subject to a sewage treatment capacity charge. The purpose of this King County charge is to pay for building sewage treatment capacity to serve newly connected customers. Single- family customers pay $10.50 a month (billed by King County as $63 every six months) for 15 years. At the customer's choice, this fee may be paid to King County as a lump sum of $1,089.40. This fee is in addition to the monthly charge for treatment that Renton is required to collect and pass to King County. The Renton portion of the Wastewater Utility Rates for customers outside the city limits is 1.5 times the standard rate for customers inside the city limits. (City Code section 8-5-1 SC) The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the City of Renton or has been granted King County Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval for extension of service outside the City .. Annexation or BRB approval ~e necessary for the provision of sanitary sewer service. The sewer system improvement is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan'. The sewer system improvement will require an amendment to the Renton Long-Range Wastewater Management Plan. The sewer system improvement will be within an existing franchise from King County allowing the installation of facilities in the County Right(s)-ofWay. The sewer system improvement will require that Renton obtain a franchise from King County to install the facilities in the County Right(s)-ofWay. CONDITIONS OF CERTIFICATION: I) It is the responsibility of the owner/developer to verify, by an engineering study, whether it is possible to connect by gravity line to the existing City sewer system (a private lift station may be installed, but is not desirable). The City may require, at it's option, the verification to be in the form of a letter signed by a professional civil engineer. 2) When new sanitary sewer lines are installed, the City typically installs or requires to have installed stub-outs to the property line. This is done as a courtesy to the property owners. The City does not guarantee a stub for all properties nor does it guarantee the condition or location of the stub. lt is the responsibility of the owner/contractor to have an approved connection from the building sewer to the City's sewer main. If there is a stub, it is in good condition, and the owner/contractor can locate it, thell" it is available for use. The determination of condition of existing sanitary sewer stubs shall be the sole responsibility of the City and the City's decision shall be final. If the stub is broken or the City inspector determines that the stub's condition is not acceptable, it shall be the owner/contractor's responsibility to repair the stub, replace the stub at the existing tee, or to install a new stub and tee directly into the main. The method of repair/replacement to be determined by the City's inspector. I hereby certify that the above sanitary sewer information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. (Fee information is s ·ect to change without notice). l )...,~&=:.. ~:z,TP1/6~ Signatory Name / '€fo. {_ Wastewater Utility Section ~u~ _ !bat /wwavail.doc FORM DC90H001. 11/20/00 -' ' ' ® King County ODES This :ertiibprovides the Seattle King County Department of Public Health and the Department of Development and Environmental Services V(ith information necessary to evaluate deyelopment DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Wa 98055-1219 proposals. · King County Certificate of Water Availability I Do not write in this box number name D Building Permit D Short Subdivision [& Preliminary Plat or PUD D Rezone or other _______ _ Applicant's name: U.S. Land Development Assoclates-Evendell Proposed use: Single Family Residences (75 lots) Location: Between 156'h & 160'" Ave SE. South of SE 136'" Street 03 acres l (attach map and legal description if necessary) ~~-..,.,.,.,..,.,. ,.., '>;'"~ .. ~ ~-·-'l"'[' ~..-. ~ ~. --,.,.,=, .:,w"ater pur~~yor in!ormation: ~ 1. D a. Water will be provided by service connection only to an existing .. (size) water main that Is fronting the site. 2. 3. 4. OR [& b. Water service will require an improvement to the water system of: D (1) feet of water main to reach the site; and/or D a. OR b. a. OR [&(2) The construction of a distribution system on the site; and/or ig:)(3) other (describe) D.E. Required-offsite Improvements. Specific reg. will be determined In preliminary requirements meeting. The water system is In conformance with a County approved _water comprehensive plan. •1· • l ', \ The water syst~m improvement Is not In conformance with ·a County approv~cfwatercomprehenslve plan and will require a water compreherislve plan amendment. (This niay cause a delay In Issuance of a permit or approval). · · · · ·· The proposed project is within the·corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of.service outside the district or city, .or Is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. · ' • · D b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval will be necessary to provide service. • , ' _j. • . ' [& • a. · .Water Is available at.the rate of flow and duration Indicated below,at no. less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant <350 feet from the property (or as marked on the attached map): ·. , • • ' : ,~ :. • ' • . ,, • .. ~ \ ';, •· l ' ' • " : , ' · Rate of flow at Peak Demand ., · · ): ·.: Djifatlon : \ · . o · less than 500 gpin (approx. gpm) · · ··; D·, less than 1 hour D ' 500 to 999 gpm ·· . : ' ib '. i' hour to 2 hours ' [& 1000 gpm or more .. ~ 2 hours or more D flow test of gpm D D calculation of . gpm · other . · ' •, . -,, ( ' ' . ·,; ' . . . (Note:. Commerc(al buildln~ p_erm_lts which Includes multlf!J~i!Y: str~';l~res:~~i~~fl6w1test. of, ~-·1~- ... "·calculation)· ... ·········-· ... ·-'· ,.',-· · •"· ·1· UD'· · ,-.•'{} -. J. -'\ , --·-. • .. • ,.,,i ~-... -. 1lr <1 ,J,;.:./" --.·\..,\, -,:-~ •. OR • ' ' 1 / • \, •• • • . . . . '· . . . . " . . J' \1 r--2JO\ D b .. ,-Water system ls:not capable of providing fire flow. · , . ; ·, • / ,, ... ,.: · , . ., · -:-" •. • • ' ~\ .. 1·· ••• • · , • • .". /~~·:'··:(.:'.:'/} • .'· ·~: .i .; :-._,::..·. : : : · . :."' ·: :·i: .:· L\t:'":,_·,\>:~::·(" _,;,j · · 1 n. ~---,f-.. ~ ,,.,,. 5. ~ a. Water system has'certificates of water right or watei-;rlght-dalms·sufficient tofprovlde service . .=.;.,. OR . ,_,.} .. ,. . -~ ·,. . -.., . ' ., .. _·;,,_·:"'.'··'·.,·ii:·. ,',\'.._:i,., ;. · D · b. Water system does· not currently have necessary water rights or water right claims. ' ' . ' , Comments/conditions: D.E. + Easements to District required. Current additional fees: $3200 GFC per ERU + meter charge . . , l' meter $1300 or 3/4" drop fee $450 I certify that the above water purveyor Information Is true. This certification shall be valld for_' 1 'year from date of signature. KING COUN1Y )NATER DISTRICT, #90 ' LESTER PIELE . RENEWA~ FEES: W/JN 1 year $50.00 Agency ~ame ':.P;~~:ry-. nam -~;A_·_: •' i ·, ,' ,:'.;~_. :~ ~;.{fr~/~1I~o COPY SUPERINTENDENT ()i-~/;f ~ · • 5/30/01 lltle Signature , · : " _. ' . Date C:\My Documents Tawnya\Water Availability\U.S. Land Development Associates.doc L© ~ (P'~ ll ~ ® PLAT OF EVENDELL 44 LOT PLAT/CURRENT ZONING ALTERNATIVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AS THE POINT OF TRUE BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00°25'21" EAST 523.99 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88° 07'58" WEST 653.61 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 00°27'05" WEST 525.82 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 88°17'35" EAST 653.84 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND EXCEPT COUNTY ROADS. K r-D 7"\ f,:: ~ .v. .u.-.0. MAIN FILE COPY ) • -. PLAT OF EVENDELL 75 LOT PLAT/R-6 RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETIE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AS THE POINT OF TRUE BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00°25'21" EAST 523.99 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88° 07'58" WEST 653.61 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 00°27'05" WEST 525.82 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 88°17'35" EAST 653.84 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT COUNTY ROADS. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 156TH AVENUE SE AS DEEDED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 1094243; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE WESTERLY 199 FEET THEREOF, AS MEASURED FROM THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 156TH AVENUE SE, LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES OILER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE NORTH 15 FEET OF THE WEST 187 FEET (AS MEASURED FROM THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY) OF LOT 2 OF SHORT PLAT NO. 878133, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8002250639, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE SOUTH 15 FEET OF THE EAST 22 FEET OF THE WEST 199 FEET, AS MEASURED FROM THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 156TH AVENUE SE, OF THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. LYING EASTERLY OFTHEEASTERLYMARGINOFSAID156THAVENUESE f"o') rc'(r"'c. , 1.'1 i n\ LnJ LS\:'.71.S~ VJ ~~ JUL 6 -2001 i,< c r D ::::: c "'· •. .J, ·--0. . MAIN FILE COPY 0 Uij@>@O~ ~ I ODES King County Department of Development and Envirorunental Services 900 Oakc:idalc Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 ,. CERTIFICATION A."iD TRANSFER OF APPLICA.c"iT STATUS Application No I, J; 8e:tZ.T A. Hftz'!:. -, hereby certif,; that I am an/the owner ofth.e property which is the subjec: of this applicatioo for pemut oc approval_ If I am not the sole owner a£ the property, L cettify that I am authori.:ed by any and all other owners of the properrv to make this certification and transfer any and all rights I/we have to apply for this permit or approval ;o #n,,JA,,i() £, ~ij . I therefore certify that /-bwAT#P £, ~4aSV is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and shall remain the "applic.uit:' for the duraticn of thiS-permit or app-rov,rl urrles, "appnca:m:" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department_ By being the "applicant," that individual assumes financial respon~ibilitv for all rees and will receive any refunds paid_ I ce~enaltyof perj;1ry under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. f._ Cf/?71 tU,,z'v J B ~" IU(! ,2 o" / Signature of Owner Date Signed --------------------------------------------------------- I, J./.n,w() £, S-m e(de'11!:</ , hereby certify that [ am the "applicant" for this permit or approval. shall remain the "applicant" for efe duration of this _permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department_ I accept fimutcial respomibilitv for :ill f= associated with this p_eJ11lit or approval and will receive any refunds. My mailing address is: /J. S. uwo /:Jc.V£ l.4/94 ti",-~~ 9'.o LfNTVteJvn P£.J/1:."1.(J f'..Cl!:/>JC SDt.vl<CS , zz.&, 17· 8 t> 0.£ St:., -So71./tl.L, W-4, "7 Roz./ -OR- I, hereby certify that I am an authorized agent of _________ __, a corporation or other business asscciatioo_au:thorized. to do business in the .Stme of Washington anc;i that this business association is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and is financiallv responsible for all ~ and will receive any cefuruis_ paid.. This. association shall remain. the :· appli=t" for the duration of this permit_or_approY.1.1 unless ''applican1'.' =sis t:rans:ferrecLin writing an_a_furm pm'lided by-!his depamnent_ Toe mailing address of this business association is: .-, ''' '.:.l;~';ff~':";r,'·e laws of the State of W ~ r the foregoing is true :md correct_ Date Signed NOTICE TO APPLIC..\N'!Sc By law. this. department. returns ill engineer'.ng and other pl:ms to the applic:mt. IC: however, you wish to authorize the d~pa_rtmem to return engineering and ether plans direcdy to the engineer. @ architect. or other con.sult.'.lm for the l.i.mited purpose of malcina correcoons, ple:ise desi=e bdow: . =i ~ ,,_ . . . . . 90) (g (Qi~ .· '.} l~ID' \ J 7f I authonze this department to return plan directly to my ccnsult:mtt.s) tor the lillUted purpose or m•1v corrections, as designated on the back of this furm_ U J'..:L 6 _ 2')!i1 1 '< C. D.D.E.G. U ~ (P@ ~. ,, .M.AIN FILE COPY I I I I I I I I I I I . CONSULT At'\/TS ' --' ... '·.·. '.II\ • _.., •• •• •• • • ~ ., 1 • ' .. _' ~ ,. ~· •....;. . ~:·. . "... . . ". ·-·M~:t~·.,. ·. _, -·- Date Signed I :ODES King County Depanment of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055·1219 ' CERTIFICATION Al'ID TRAi'ISFER OF APPLICANT STATUS Application No. I, Avio A. N'lf3f(ln . 'hereby certify that I am an/the owner of the property whii:h is the subject of this application for pemrit or approval. If I am not the sole owner of the property, L certify that I am authorized by any and all other owners of the propertJ to make this certification and transfer any and all rights I/we have to apply for this permit or approval to l[n.,1,w() £, .S~'yl . I therefore_ c~rtify that_ f-bwArt¥J E:. . ~.6utf.J/. is the "app Ii cant" for_ this permit or approval and shall remam·the "app~' for the duraUM of this. permit or approval um= "apphcant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. By being the "applicant," that individual assumes financial responsibility for all fees and will receive any refimds paid. rjury Wlder the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. . :::futb I~ zeo ( Signa re of Owner Date Signed I, J/.,w,w(} t", ~ t(f'r¢'<( , hereby certify that I am the "applicant" for this permit or approval. I shall remain the "applicant" for~ duration ofthis_peimit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. I accept financial respomibility for alJ fees associated with this p_eJillit or approval and will receive any refunds. My mailing address is: II.$. UIJilQ i,e.v£U/il4t1'1,-A&s«!,4'/1:S.. % LflflV/J.Jvn /)£,,;J:."l,IJf;ce:,Jr .st)t.vlCCS, zz,17-8 t,. ~ se,,/!,op.Jt:J.'l., WA, '7/'0Z./ -OR- I, hereby certify that I am an authorized agent of ----------' a corporation or other business association..authorized.to do business in the .State of Washington an\i that this business association is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and is financiallv responsible for all ~ and will receive any refunds. paid.. Th.is. association shall remain. the :·applicant" for the duration of this permit.or.approval unless ''.applicant'.' .sta:tllS is tran.sferred.in writing on..a..form pro.'lided. b.y..this department. The mailing address of this business association is: ' · .:;,: er the laws of the StateofW~thatthe foregoing is true and correct. 7/J/tP/ of AppliC311!. Date Signed MAIN FILE COPY NOTICE TO APPLIE:Ai'i1"S; By law, this.department returns all engineering and other plans to the applicant. !®"· however, you wish to authorize the department to return engineering and other plans directly to the engineer, t architect, or other consultant for the limited purpose of making corrections, please designate below: . -;:,,ID I authorize this department to return plan directly to my consu!tant(s) for the lirniteapu,r'P.~@/i:,alqi,J \s\ D corrections, as designated on the back of this form. \ ':12 . " UI.J 11.!'-G -?.~.i\ C: \W!NDCWS\ TE.'1P\ Applica l . .::oc IL r 0 :J,_ . ....,. · @ra ""' I'"\ r:: ~ L@~ a O ij~JJ;Jo/99V• ' ' COl'iSUL T AJ'\/TS . ·~· . .. .. . .. -... · "· 1··-'/"0WS\·rs~,1 'ool~JT\n ~ ~J_d~~,.,l)' •c • , .••. _ -··· ., .. ·s::t O .\!JH\;l~-~-'li i .... u -..•.. 0 . ~~).lt ;9- I Date Signed ® * King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055,1219 Technician:----------------- ~riginal application fonn (plus 2 copies): No. Submitted :) D Original signature of owner/developer/agent D Original signature and stamp of surveyor D All requested infonnation in applicant section filled out. D One set of current assessor's maps showing: No. Submitted __ _ D Property to be submitted outlined in red. D Adjoining properties under the same ownership outlined in yellow. D All properties within 500 feet of the subdivider' s ownership. D If assessor maps are stamped "See enlargement," the enlargement must be submitted. D Mark the map showing subject property with a red X just under the section-twp and range designation of the map. D Number maps using first numbers for X marked maps. (Example of numbering format is"! of3", "2 of3", "3 of3") fl Put plat name and number on each sheet. Id"' j.egal description (3 copies) cv'Proof of "legal" lot status: (date and method of segregation) c/E ·ronmental Checklist (20 copies)· , Check that it is signed and dated No. Submitted ;)0 No. Submitted 3 minary Health Department Approval if on septic/or well (3 copies) D Approved Jl Form signed by H~alth Department Office Offici~l within one year oftodais date. CV Certificate of Water and/or Sewer Availability, if applicable (3 copies} . No. Submitted 3 D Form signed by water and/or sewer district official within one year of today's date. D Certificate of future Conn~ction, if applicable (I copy) , , , , · .2._ ~rtificate of Transportation Concurrency (1 copy) ip/"Fire District Receipt'(! copy)' •· · !:] Sighed by fire district official, within 30 days of today's date: [!/'Level-One Drainage Analysis (8 copies) ilJ/"~ceptual,Dr~inage Plan (8 copies) · .,,. · · , . vpensity calculations/lot area calculations li:V'Certificate/affidavit of sensitive areas compliance ~~licant Status Fann (I copy eiich) . · ' c;v'"Additional Studies and/or Information (optional) (8 copies each) '. ' ' .,. No. Submitted 3 No. Submitted~ No. Submitted~ No. Submitted 8 No. Submitted .? No. Submitted 3 No. Submitted -I ! ,. .;t '' 1•,. • • h · • • -.. ,., "OPY 1-.-u \II • . . ' , • ~ • ·,' t < , ,; " ' I D Copies of variance decisions required per KCC Title 2 IA No. Submitted .? 1TI\ ~ts of.other, issued or pending permits or decisions related to the proposal·'·~ O~~~SG~mitted 1 \S fi:V if Jill~ ll,~PO' ~ (3 ~op\\!,s),i~~~ed, w/in 30,?ays of,appli?~tion , .. ·.• .' 1, ' _ru J, L s ~ 'l'J .. li\ l!Y"" Prehmmary Plat (35 copies) , , , , 1,, .. 1 , , , , ,_1..\ J:) ... , , . \:' · ' · . /0 Stamped and signed by_ land surveyor ".J.·\') V L , , , , r .-.. D. ~. S .. WP/FORMS::R:~:1:s::::u::i:~s:::~~N:::~e;:ECKLISTDOC rn29ro9 CLC . . \)~ j K. V. LJ • ge 1 ® un19mo1J; I I I I I I I I I """' Preliminary pint mnp (35 prll,. _ _}iidcd): I D Name of proposed subdivision with a limit of 32 letters and spaces, D Name., address, phone number, signature and seal ofland surveyor. D Name, address, and phone number of engineer. D Name, address, and phone number of developer .. D. Name, address, and phone number of owner. D s.ection, Township, Range of subdivision. D Acreage of subdivision. D Number oflots, units and proposed density. D Existing zone classification. D Check/verify zoning D Proposed use (Le., townhouse, single family detached) D Means of sewage disposal; if sewer district, include name. D Source of water; if water district, include name. D School district. D Fire district D Telephone service. D Power source. D Legal description -type or print. D Field topography and verification and signature. I l D Vicinity map showing sufficient area and detail to clearly locate the subdivision in relation to surrounding roads, parks, rivers, and municipal boundaties'together with its scale. · (Include Section, Township and Range lines.) · Graphic representation shall show the following: D North arrow and scale. Recommended scale= I" io 100'.· D Indicate by a heavy line the boundaries of the subdivision. D. Use heavier line weight for streets so they wili st~nd ~iit'ftom the Jots ~nd contour lines. ,, • ,, 1 • .' D Dimension all lots and streets to the nearest foot. • J ' ~ D Label all streets, existing and proposed. Identify areas of proposed dedication and purpose. ' . • ! ) •• 1,. '.' ~ ·' '·' D Verified field sµ,;vey, with contour intervals of either 2 feet or 5 feet within the boundaries of the proposal. 2-foot intervals w/in urban growth area when slopes are.less than 15%. 5-foot intervals for slopes exce~dii:ig 15%. D Show boundary lines of adjacent tracts within 500 feet of the subject subdivision together with property ownerships: , : 1 ·' • 1 • • - 1r·1 ., ,. ! . ' ,,, I D Show all existing structures and parcels in their appropriate locations both within the proposed subdivision and within I 00 feet of the boundaries, of the pwposed subdivision. D Number lots consecutively from I to the total number of lots: . ' D Locate and show all sensitive areas and hydrologic features w 0 itl1in 500 feet of the boundaries aerial survey acceptalile off-site. Indicate if streams are intermittent and the limits of any wetlands. Estimate the limits of the 25-year floodplain for streams and I 00-year floodplain for rivers. Provide names of all water features and all drainage basins served by or containing these features . . -..• . ~ . . . -' . D If parcels of land are set aside for residential or reserved for future deveiopment, indicate proposed use. D If electrical transmission Jines cross the subject property, show locations of poles and towers. D Provide adjacent existing zoning. D Identify substantial grading outside the proposed right-of-way. D · Sight distance for entry to all County Roads. D Locate and show all physical and legal description encroachments. Graphic representation shall show the following (co11ti1med): , .. , i,... . ,· ' ·'!• '. ! r . D Existing sewers, .waterrnains, culverts or other underground facilities within tract; indicating pipe sizes, grades, exact location. D Show location, widths and names of all existing, adjoinlhg; b~'j,fior platted stre.~ts,9r other p1,1blic ways, railroad, a~d utility rights-of-way, parks and other public open sp~c~~· , ·; '· ' ' D Any existing easements on the subject property. · -:-•. · I . . WP/FORMS1FiR~~JIGI.S"4\~'~µeo1'(1s1~APP{NTAl<E CHECK~1sr ooc 121291119 cLc i ~~~Jyt1,& 1>~ . I page 2 Hearing Date STR ZONE INFORMATION E"ILE NO. RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION AND JUSTIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE WLIY4Dl Zone Exist Zone Request ---------Kroll & Book No. __________ _ Zone Granted --------- Acreage 0 rd in an c e # F.H.B./C.D.A. Ref. E'ile # Sensitive Area Shoreline Desig. ----------------------------~ Ag. District Land Use Design Comm. Plan Area Area Location ************************* Do not write above this line******************* 1. Existing Zone: R-4 2. Requested Zone: R-6 3. Acreage: 13.76 6.· Sec.-Twp.-R.: SW '1 14-23-05 4. Water District: King Co Dist #90 7.Sewer District:City of Benton 5. Fire District: K.C. #25 8. School District: ReotonOssaqnah - 9. Has an environmental impact statement (EIS) been prepared for the proposed development ( J Yes ( X ) No. 10. List all buildings and land uses which are present on the property. The property contains one house, a J.arge metal. shed and smaJ.J. stabJ.e/.barn. Most of t:he J.and is forested wi t:h some in pasture. 11. Describe existing land uses on adjoining properties. The surrounding area is in transition from primariJ.y J.arger lot subuz:ban residentia1 uses to higher density urban residentia1 development. Surrounding parcels range from under 11, 000 square feet to over 4.5 acres. Some of t:he larger parcels are undeveloped whiJ.e t:he smaller parceJ.s contain homes buiJ.t on platted lots with onsite septic systems. K.C. D.D.E.S. Page I of 11 MAIN FILE COPY ~~~~~~©[NJ (sheer I oni& ZONE INFORMATION FILE NO. RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION AND JUSTIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE Hearing Date Zone Exist STR Zone Request~~~~~~~~~ Kroll & Book No. Zone Granted~~~~~~~~~ Acreage F.H.B./C.D.A. Sensitive Area Shoreline Desig.' Ag. District Land Use Design Comm. Plan Area Area Location Ordinance# Ref. File# ************************* Do not write above this line******************* 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Acreage:~~~~~~~1=3~.0~l~- Water District: King Co Dist #90 Fire District: KC #25 6. Sec.-Twp.-R.: SW~ 14-23-05 7.Sewer District:City of Renton~- 8.School District: Penton 9. Has an environmental impact statement (EIS) been prepared for the proposed development ( J Yes ( X) No. 10. List all buildings and land uses which are present on the property. The property contains one house, a large metal shed and small stable/barn. Most of the land is forested with some in pasture. 11. Describe existing land uses on adjoining properties. The surrounding area is in transition from primarily larger lot suburban residential uses to higher density urban residential development. Surrounding parcels range from under 11,000 square feet to over 4.5 acres. Some of the larger parcels are undeveloped while the smaller parcels contain homes built on platted lots with onsite septic systems. Page 1 of 11 Exhibit No. __.._2':-', .... B..__, --= Item No. b~ I f (,)t) Ho + L.ti rT"'j "'l~J Received :S -l,, ~ Q3 King County Hearing Examiner ZONE RECLASSIFICATION INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION ,/ APPLICATION QUESTIONNAIRE CONTINUES 12. What is the proposed use of the property under the requested zone? The project proposal is to subdivide the property into 75 lots for single family detached homes on 13 acres at an average density of 5.76 lots per acre. 13. Have you made this request or your planned development known to interested community groups or neighboring property owners? ( ) Yes ( X) No. If yes, whom have you notified and what were their reactions? 14. What effect will the proposed zoning and contemplated use of the subject property have on adjoining or neighboring properties? Locally increased traffic and population; altered views from primarily pasture and scrub to urban residential homes, streets and landscaping; existing substandard roads as well as unopened county road right of way will be upgraded to public road standards; extension of gravity sewers within close proximity to surrounding properties. 15. How can the uses permitted within the proposed zone be made compatible with uses permitted on abutting property or dissimilar zoning? Land uses permitted within the existing and proposed zones are the same and are, therefore, compatible. 16. Is this a logical expansion of any existing adjacent zone? Yes. Although not immediately adjacent, the Maplewood Estates property, located about 1500 feet northwest of the subject site is zoned R-8 in the City of Ren ton. The density proposed for the subject application is analogous to the densities achieved in that zoning and generally conforms to the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan as implemented by the City's zoning code. This conformance with City of Renton Comprehensive Plans was reviewed by City of Renton Long Range Planning staff prior to the City's issuance of a Sewer Availability Letter (copy attached). In addition, the recently approved plat and rezone of Highlands Estates, located 900' due west of the subject site and kitty- corner to the Maplewood Estates project, proposes approximately 60 lots on 8. 67 acres at an average density of 6. 92 lots per acre. The Highlands Estates property was the subject of a zoning reclassification from R-4 to R-8. The K. C. Council approved the decision of the King County Hearing Examiner and adopted the reclassified zoning on June 11'", 2001 by ordinance# 2001-0187.2. Page 2 of 11 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE CONTINUES 17. To the best of your knowledge, was a reclassification request made on this property at the time of the last area zoning or at any other time in the past? NO. 18. Since the last area zoning of the subject property, have authorized public improvements, private development, or other circumstances materially or significantly affected the property? (X) Yes ( ) No. If· yes, what are the changed circumstances and how have they affected the property? Recently, a portion of the East Renton Potential Annexation Area (ERPAA)was annexed into the City of Renton. This annexation included lands northwest of the subject site. According to the adopted City of Renton Comprehensive Plan, properties with a residential designation within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGA) that are greater than % mile from the UGA may be zoned R-5 ( 5 units per net acre), R-8 (8 Units Per Net Acre) or Mobile Home Park. Included within this annexed area is the Maplewood Estates property. Subsequent to annexation that portion of the Maplewood Estates site closest to the subject property was up-zoned from King County R-4 to City of Renton R-8. In conjunction with development of Maplewood Estates a gravity sewer connection will be constructed within 1500 feet of the northwest corner of Evendell. This gravity sewer connection will allow gravity access to all of the properties directly east and somewhat southeast of the Maplewood Estates project. More recently, in King County jurisdiction, the Highland Estates project has received preliminary plat approval and zoning reclassification from R-4 to R-8. This project is located south east of and kitty-corner to the Maplewood Estates site about 900 feet due west of the subject site on SE 136'h Street. Highlands Estates proposes a gravity sewer connection at its' northeast corner that, when constructed, will provide a gravity sewer connection in SE 136'h Street about 900 feet from the subject site. In conjunction with the development of the above two plat SE 136'h Street will be improved to King County Subcollector and Neighborhood Collector standard from 152"" Ave. SE to 156'h Ave. SE. In addition, the plat of Highlands Estates will construct intersection improvements at SE 136'" St. /156'h Ave. SE providing a northbound left turn lane and southbound right turn pocket. These improvements will affect the eastern portion of 156'" Ave. SE right of way proximate to the subject site. Development of the Maplewood Estates and Highlands Estates plats will bring urban residential densities comparable to those proposed in the subject application within close proximity to the subject property. The sights and sounds of relatively dense urban development will forever change the character of the surrounding area particularly those properties in the vicinity of SE 136 Street and 156'h Ave. SE. Page 3 of 11 ZONE INFORMATION AND RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION JUSTIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE CONTINUES In addition, a sewage lift station is proposed for construction in conjunction with development of Evendell. This lift station, to be located near the southeast corner of the Evendell property will provide a central location for gravity sewers from a .much greater portion of the surrounding East Renton PAA (approximately 37 acres based on review of topographic maps). From this new lift station sewage flows would be pumped via force main to a new manhole to be located at the intersection of SE 135th St. and 159th Ave. SE. From there, flows would be conveyed by a new gravity sewer system located in SE 136~ Street to the northeast corner of Highlands Estates. The combination of sewer systems constructed Estates, Highlands Estates and Evendell would availability to a large area that was previously served and, therefore, unable to be developed to contemplated in the King County Comprehensive Plan. by Maplewood bring sewer unable to be the densities 19. Public roads and/or other means, i.e., easements, by which access would be provided to the site. Development of the Evendell property as proposed under the reclassification alternative ~ill require improving existing unimj'roved or marginally improved King County right of way ( SE 136' Street) adjacent to and leadin~ to the site east from 156th Ave. SE. to a connection with 160' Ave. SE. Specifically, the improvements contemplated include: 1. Construct an urban neighborhood collector road from 155t• Ave. SE to the plat entry at 158'" Ave. SE. The road would be fully developed except for sidewalks along the north side. Existing ROW through this section consists only of the north 30' wide half. The eastern section is partially developed with a narrow strip of asphalt pavement. The west 300' is unopened. 2. Construct half-street urban neighborhood collector road along the RfOject frontage from the plat entry at 159t• Ave. SE to 160 Ave. SE. The current existing right of way through this section is unopened and consists of the north 30' wide half. Page 4 of 11 INFORMATION ZONE AND RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION JUSTIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE CONTINUES 20. The attached forms concerning sewer and water availability must be completed by the appropriate agency (sewer district, water district, city, water company, or water association) whether or not public water or sewer service is planned for the proposed development, unless the site is to be served by an on-site waste disposal system or private well, and is located in the Rural Area as defined by the King County Comprehensive Plan. If a waste disposal system other than public sewers is proposed, explain what type of system will be utilized. If water service is planned to be provided by some means other than an existing water purveyor, explain how it will be provided. The required forms are included in the development application. 21. Which King County Comprehensive Plan and relevant community plan principles and policies regarding appropriate land use, access, utilities, etc., support this request? Will an amendment to the King County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map be required to support this request? The King County Comprehensive Land Use Map designates the subject property as Urban Residential/4-12 DU per acre. The incident request is to rezone the property from R-4 to R-6. Since R-6 is within the density . range of the Land Use Designation an amendment to the King County Comprehensive Land Use Map will not be required to support this request. This rezone request is supported by numerous King County Comprehensive Plan principles and policies, e.g., U-114 King County shall seek to achieve through future planning efforts over the next 20 years, an average zoning density of at least seven to eight homes per acre in the Urban Growth Area through a mix of densities and housing types. A lower density zone may be used to recognize existing subdivisions with little or no opportunity for infill or redevelopment. Although in the instant case the requested zoning will result in a density slightly under the targeted average density it is located in an area where substantial prior development resulting in relatively large septic lots with density less than 4 per acre has occurred. The proposal would serve to assist in achieving the general comprehensive plan goal of higher densities in the urban area. It should also be noted that, in order to obtain sewer availability from the City of Renton, proposed development outside of the City must generally conform to City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use policies. Renton policy requires that density be calculated on a net basis and precludes service to attached units. The unit count at King County R-6 density is closely analogous, in this case, to City of Renton R·B density and results in the highest density possible for this project that will be served by the City of Renton. Page 5 of 11 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE CONTINUES U-121 King County supports increases in urban residential density through a rezone or a proposal to increase density through the density transfer or density incentive programs when the proposal will help resolve traffic, sewer, water, parks or open space deficiencies in the immediate neighborhood. The applicant proposes to provide sewer system and transportation system improvements that will resolve existing local deficiencies in these two areas of concern: SEWER When complete the Evendell sewer system will allow access to approximately 37 total acres to its' lift station. In addition, approximately 450 acres upstream of the Evendell project ( generally located between 162"d Ave. SE on the east and 156'" Ave. SE on the west and between SE 128'" St. on the north and SE 136'" St on the south) would be able to connect, via gravity sewer mains, to the gravity portion of the sewer system to be constructed within SE 136'• Street. In total, nearly 500 acres of urban area currently without sewer service could be served upon completion of the Evendell sewer system improvements. TRAFFIC Currently only SE 144~ Street, approximately 3,600 feet south of the subject property, provides an east-west route connecting the Renton Highlands area south of SE 128'" Street and east of 156'" Ave. SE to 156'" Ave. SE. SE 156'" Street is identified by King County as a minor arterial and is considered the main north-south thoroughfare in the vicinity. In planning for this project the applicant has determined that the easterly extension of SE 136'" · St all the way to 168'" Ave. SE is feasible. The Evendell project proposes constructing that portion of SE 136'" Street between 160'" Ave. SE and 156'" Ave. SE. When complete this would provide full-width neighborhood collector road improvements· between 158'" and 156'" and half- street improvements between 160'" and 158'• providing a greatly needed and highly desired second east-west route connecting to 156'". Page 6 of 11 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE CONTINUES 22. Which of the additional Examiner findings list below (e.g., A, B, C, or D) apply to the zone reclassification request. Explain the relevant circumstance(s). Note: If you are requesting a reclassi- fication to the M Zone, the additional Examiner findings does not apply to it. KCC 20. 24 .190 Additional examiner findings Reclassifications and shoreline redesignations. When the examiner issues a recommendation regarding an application for a reclassification of property or for a shoreline environment redesignation, the recommendation shall include additional findings which support the conclusion that at least one of the following circumstances applies: A. The property is potentially zoned for the reclassification being requested and conditions have been met which indicate the reclassification is appropriate; or B. An adopted community plan or area zoning specifies that the property shall be subsequently considered through an individual reclassification application; or c. Where a community plan has been adopted but zoning ,has not been adopted, that reclassification or shoreline redesignation is the adopted community plan; or subsequent area the proposed consistent with D. The applicant has demonstrated with substantial evidence that: 1. Since the last previous area zoning or shoreline environment designation of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other conditions or circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone substantial and material change not anticipated or contemplated in the community plan or area zoning; 2. The impacts from the changed conditions or circumstances affect the subject property in a manner and to a degree different from other properties in the vicinity such that rezoning or redesignation is not appropriate (for these other properties); and 3 The requested reclassification or redesignation is required in the public interest. Page 7 of 11 ) ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE CONTINUES (Please provide your response, if lengthy, on an attached sheet of paper.) See response attached. 23. If you are specifically requesting a p-suffix designation as part of your reclassification request, provide detailed and specific language describing the P-suffix limitation you are requesting King County to approve. Not applicable 24. You may submit any additional information (sketches, site plans, engineering reports, petitions, photographs, etc.) which you believe will justify, clarify, or assist in the review of your requested zone reclassification. The Department of Development and Environmental Services or the Zoning and Subdivision Examiner may at any time request further information or studies for this purposes. Please find all relevant proposal information attached as part of the overall project submittal package. Page 8 of 11 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EVENDELL REQUEST FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION RESPONSE TO QUESTION 22 Additional examiner finding D. is appropriate for the subject request. D.1. Since the last previous area zoning or shoreline environment designation of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other conditions or circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone substantial and material change not anticipated or contemplated in the community plan or area zoning; Recently, a portion of the East Renton Potential Annexation Area (ERPAA)was annexed into the City of Renton. This annexation included lands northwest of the subject site. According to the adopted City of Renton Comprehensive Plan, properties with a residential designation within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGA) that are greater than % mile from the UGA may be zoned R-5 ( 5 units per net acre), R-8 (8 Units Per Net Acre) or Mobile Home Park. Included within this annexed area is the Maplewood Estates property. Subsequent to annexation that portion of the Maplewood Estates site closest to the subject property was up-zoned from King County R-4 to City of Renton R-8. In conjunction with development of Maplewood Estates a gravity sewer connection will be constructed within 1500 feet of the northwest corner of Evendell. This gravity sewer connection will allow gravity access to all of the properties directly east and somewhat southeast of the Maplewood Estates project. More recently, in King County jurisdiction, the Highland Estates project has received preliminary plat approval and zoning reclassification from R-4 to R-8. This project is located south east of and kitty-corner to the Maplewood Estates site about 900 feet due west of the subject site on SE 136th Street. Highlands Estates proposes a gravity sewer connection at its' northeast corner that, when constructed, will provide a gravity sewer connection in SE 136'h Street about 900 feet from the subject site. In conjunction with the development of the above two plat SE 135th Street will be improved to King County Subcollector and Neighborhood Collector standard from 152"d Ave. SE to 156th Ave. SE. In addition, the plat of Highlands Estates will construct intersection improvements at SE 136'h St. /156'h Ave. SE providing a northbound left turn lane and southbound right turn pocket. These improvements will affect the eastern portion of 156'h Ave. SE right of way proximate to the subject site. Development of the Maplewood Estates and Highlands Estates plats will bring urban residential densities comparable to those proposed in the subject application within close proximity to the subject property. The sights and sounds of relatively dense urban development will forever change the character of the surrounding area particularly those properties in the vicinity of SE 136 Street and 156'b Ave. SE. Page 9 of 11 ZONE INFORMATION AND RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION JUSTIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE CONTINUES In addition, a sewage lift station is proposed for construction in conjunction with development of Evendell. This lift station, to be located near the southeast corner of the Evendell property will provide a central location for gravity sewers from a much greater portion of the surrounding East Renton PAA (approximately 37 acres based on review of topographic maps). From this new lift station sewage flows would be pumped via force main to a new manhole to be located at the intersection of SE 136'• St. and 158th Ave. SE. From there, flows would be conveyed by a new gravity sewer system located in SE 136'• Street to the northeast corner of Highlands Estates. The combination of sewer systems constructed Estates, Highlands Estates and Evendell would availability to a large area that was previously served and, therefore, unable to be developed to contemplated in the King County Comprehensive Plan. by Maplewood bring sewer unable to be the densities D.2. The impacts from the changed conditions or circumstances affect the subject property in a manner and to a degree different from other properties in the vicinity such that rezoning or redesignation is not appropriate (for these other properties); The subject property is strategically positioned topographically for locating a sewage lift station sized to serve a much larger area than the development site. Further, the Evendell property is one of the few properties large enough to create sufficient lots to warrant the expense of a lift station and over 1500 feet of offsite gravity sewer main .. Topography and/or distance preclude smaller properties east and north of the site from reaching the Highlands Estates sewer system with gravity service. In addition, due to their higher elevation in the drainage basin, the surrounding properties are not positioned to provide a lift station capable of serving the scope of the region the subject site can serve. The combination of size, topographic location and proximity to the Highlands Estates/Maplewood Estates developments creates a unique situation where higher density for the subject site will be proximate to similar density and will create economic feasibility for the provision of sewer service to a wide area. When complete, development of Evendell will enable surrounding properties to develop at their current designations or higher, if desired. This in turn will encourage development of this area of the County in conformance with the King County Comprehensive Plan as mandated by the Growth Management Act. D.3. The requested reclassification or redesignation is required in the public interest. The requested reclassification is in the public interest because it: l. Achieves the residential density goals set forth in the King County Comprehensive Plan, Page 10 of 11 :~·-, ............ ~ .. , ... ,~ ......... ..,_ ,,~., .... --·:"'" ""' ............ Hl!111111· ' 'I! ! .1 •11111•!1· I i f :l'ljP 1 II 11'1 . ! l . II I J'llj IJj(' i: ;:11 'i'II I I • l i!IH i!llj i ! ' :e· ~ .lll d ~L I • . \ . . ll'flll'i i ;11 I I j'i I II I .,,._. _. " I I I i!f H i!ll 1 1 I I ' " - 156th Aven'ue So the st i i I i i . I ! .i . i ; . ~ i i I • --···-·-·--·---'---·--- !· .. I . King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakescfalc A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 . Application Number(s ): _1e:~..JL...lf__l!L!l,.,L...JJc..J!;.'.~----STR: _/j,{J --5£ /4--J.-3 -: 0 I 1,, / / Exhibit N~:-'· ··2,~ Date Filed: ____ 7'-1--'w"'-+, ""-Q-'-------~-llll"""elll No. LI:)\ :f'S:>t:::>l lp...,.. J. .... S~ n-'\4l O / Application Name: ---------------......'.=~:.:'..::~=:,==-="'~-="l::l="·?>~==- , .• ' • I (We) request the following permit(s) or apprcival(s): D Building Pennit D Clearing & Grading Permit D Temporary Use Perniit D Binding Site Plan c, [] Site Dev~lop~~~t Permit D Boundary Line Adjustment ; ' 1 ~ D, ·Slloit'SubdiVision" · ' !){ Formal Subdivision . I D Urban Planned Development . D Plat Alteration D Plat Vacation 0 Road Variance , o Drainage v anfu1ce 0 Right-of-Way Use Pennit · D .Shorelin~ ·Exemption D Shoreline Substantial Development Permit D Shoreline Conditional Use Permit D Shoreline Variance _.,,D Shoreline Redesigna!i.on, D Zoning Variance D Conditional Use Permit . D Reuse Of Public Schools D Special Use Permit '){ Zone Reclassification -' D Site Specific Comprehensive Plan Amendment D P-Suffix Amendment 0 Reasonable Use Exception · .. ' ' ' • J ••• • • ••• .. ·o-Public Agency & Utility Exception · D Periodic Review for Mining Sites I, )/4!NA,e:f) Ii:, · ~{'i9,(.[,Bv1&1/ ·. being duly sworn, state that I am the owner or (print name) . 7 officer of the corporation owning property described in the legal description filed with this appli- cation and that I have reviewed the rules and regulations of the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) regarding the preparation and filing of this application and that all statements, answers artd infpnnation submitted with is application are in all respects true, accurate · and coniplete to. the best ofmy knowledge and belief. During the review of this application, it may be necessary for DDES staff to make one or more site· visits .. By signing this application form, you are giving pem1ission for these· visits. If it is rental · property, the owner hereby agrees to notify tenants of possible site visits. printed name I ..:Vo ?~rvrz/o,..f Ol:.rG.J.oPt-ft.""lr 5£Je11it£!,,, ZZ<o/7-e, e1, p,e St. mailing address corporation or company name . -~. If applicable, state below, the name, address and telephone number of th~\'.1~.!!J!l@~IDageriUfor . this application as shown on the Certification and Transfer of Application Status form filed with this application. . · MAIN FILE COPY ?£AJr11#-Jv,,..!'"fYL-Vt:~~t.JT f!zs') L/ 819 -.tr,;'-:3 telep d k.11,.. • _ __..,,,$.:.;..:..'vl41aL'""'=~'-"_ai-/i-ng_a,_/,_/,._es-"sAJ=:'6.::.___q~@~zif" city slate z,p V '· Application for Lan<~c Pcnnit(s) Page Two . For Formal S1ibdivisions only~ ,E°v'E:wf)E.LL Name ofS1ibdivisio11 Regislered Land Surveyor Engineer Hri.JAJW £, 57i4Mf8<.)/ty' 11. s. Ltw.() P1:.'t11:1.!£Mu.rT mrt1dA'{l;S Developer Land.Surveyor's Certification: I hereby certify that the accompanying plat has been inspected by.me and conforms lo all rules and rcgulat' ns of the platting resolution and stan rds fo . g County, Washington. ... ·.t '; . . Date: U 1-r1 I i /Z71t./ Address 1111d Zip fAlll:.Y At.& . k-.. , ~~~ t,,11 "71'3?0 (i~ ) (iZ {. -tJ.3oo 7eepwne 11 · 14,ozuv .s Name /3c,z& -1./~ t!-~r: ,Hv~J.:tu, 'l Vl7F Address nm/ Zip ' " . fqs-> 7'1S--5'".f7z. Teiep1011e fl ur. · Name Pi:,. ~y,£ Z.Zl.o-o Address a11ci Zip (¥v;:) ... ;g,-ir,:1 Telep!tone fl , ... \ . I . ... --· ---~~ . . . • . . • . . . . \ ! . ·' . Note: Application fonns and submittal requirements· arc s(1bject to revision without. notice. •, . ' F~lE COPY Evendeli Plat IREc1::,v~o AUG 2 ,q 2002 LAN~;USEl,(}LJiHY SERVICES Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis !EXPIRES: -··, 0(12 I LD 1 PO o IS Submitted to: King County DUES 900 Oakesdale Avenue S.W. Renton, WA 98055 Prepared by: Haozous Engineering, P.S. 9957 171" Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 Tel. (425) 235-2707 Fax (425) 254-0579 Exhibit No. l Z. "11gust 26, 2002 Item No.LO I POO/l 0 + LO /i'y-<./(J J Reca1ved $ -(o <-0,3 Kint, County Hearing Examiner L\filb\~INI !FUil..~ ©@!Jl>'\f Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis !EXPIRES: 2/19/ {) J Submitted to: King County DDES 900 Oakesdale Avenue S.W. Renton, WA 98055 Prepared by: Haozous Engineering, P.S. 9957 171~ Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 Tel. (425) 235-2707 Fax (425) 254-0579 August 26, 2002 • /j=(/ II O Z O U II /Eng/nt1orlng, 9957 I 7t" Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 Jax (425) 254-0579 (425/135-1707 August 26, 2002 Mr. Michael Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 8th Drive SE Bothell, WA 98021 Re: Evendell Plat -Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis DDES File No. Dear Mr. Romano: ,, . s. This letter report documents the methods and results of a Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis requested by DDES for the Evendell Plat. Separate analyses were conducted for the two drainage courses from the Evendell site. Project Description The Evendell Plat is a proposed residential development located within the Renton Highlands area of unincorporated King County (Figure 1 ). The proposal for development includes building single-family dwellings on approximately 12 acres (Haozous Engineering, June 2001). Road improvements along SE 1361h Street are also proposed. Level 2 RID standards are being proposed for the onsite stormwater facility as is required by the King County Flow Application Maps and recommended by Lower Cedar River Basin and Nonpoint Action Plan. Site Description The site is located within the Orting Hills sub basin of the Cedar River watershed (King County Department of Natural Resources, 1999). The site is located east of 156th Avenue SE and is bordered by SE 136th Street on the north and by 160th A venue SE on the east. Cover types on the site include a single-family residence, pasture, and forest. A Class 2 wetland has been identified in the northeast portion of the site. The site consists of two basins with most of the project area draining to the easterly basin. The easterly basin drains to a conveyance system along 160th A venue SE. The westerly basin drains to a conveyance system along 156th A venue SE. Both downstream drainage courses eventually discharge to an unclassified tributary of the Cedar River (King County Department of Parks, Planning, and Resources, 1990). :·l ) Drainage Complaints Drainage complaints along the downstream systems were investigated at King County Water and Land Resource Division as part of the Level 1 Downstream Drainage Analysis submitted with the project's preliminary technical information report (TIR)(Haozous Engineering, June 2001). Since the preliminary TIR was prepared, neighborhood comment forms, collected by C.A.R.E., have been reviewed for information about drainage-related problems in the basins. Of particular note, flooding from the ditch on the east boundary of the Evendell site has been observed by Mr. Bret Bowden, a resident at 13814 160th Avenue SE. When flooding occurs, water crosses the road and flows onto Mr. Bowden's property. Mr. Don Gregg, a resident at 16046 SE 142"d Place, has also observed portions of 160th Avenue SE inundated by flooding during the past 5 years. Methodology A hydraulic analysis was conducted for conveyance systems along both 1601 h Avenue SE and 1561h Avenue SE. The conveyance system along 1601h Avenue SE was evaluated from the east boundary of the site for a distance of 2,300 feet. The conveyance system along I 56th Avenue SE was evaluated from a location due west of the site for a distance of 1,900 feet. Both systems consist of driveway culverts, pipe segments, and open channel. The model Stormshed™ was used to predict runoff rates from contributing basins and to model the hydraulics of the conveyance systems. Stormshed™ is widely applied in similar projects and has been adopted by Washington State Department of Transportation for assessing and designing highway conveyance systems. A field survey of the downstream systems was conducted by a licensed surveyor. Ditch cross sections, pipe inverts, catch basin rims, and road surface elevations were surveyed to obtain data for the Stormshed™ hydraulic model. A summary of each structure surveyed is provided in Table 1. Basin boundaries contributing to the conveyance system were based on aerial topography and the Cedar River Basin Plan. The basin boundaries were field-verified and divided into subbasins contributing to various branches of the conveyance system (Figure 2). The easterly basin was divided into seven subbasins (el -e7), ranging from I .1 to 33.9 acres in size (Table 2). The westerly basin was divided into eight subbasins (wl -w8), ranging from 1.2 to 16.3 acres in size. Cover types and land uses in the subbasins were based on a 1990 aerial photograph and updated for recent development by conducting a field reconnaissance. The basins consist of mostly single-family residential land use with housing densities ranging from about 1 to 6 dwelling units per acre. Land uses and cover types are shown in Figure 3. The east basin was estimated to have a total of 124.4 acres, with 35.6 acres in forest, 20.2 in 2 ) pasture, and 68.7 acres in single-family residential land use (Table 3). The west basin was estimated to have a total of 48.3 acres, with 6.5 acres in forest, 7.0 in pasture, and 33.4 acres in single-family residential land use, and 1.4 acres occupied by a church. Based on King County Soil Survey (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1973) soil types in the basins consist of Alderwood soils. The Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph (SBUH) model was used to model the runoff from each of the subbasins contributing to the conveyance systems. Curve numbers for the subbasins were based on the weighted averages of the various land uses in the watershed (Table 4). Hydrographs for the 2-, 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-year storms were routed through the Stormshed™ hydraulic model of the conveyance systems to determine flooding locations and their approximate return periods. The Evendell site and other contributing areas in the basins were modeled under their existing land use conditions. Travel paths for each subbasin were based on aerial topography. The type of flow, flow length, and slope used to calculate time-of-concentrations are summarized in Table 5. Rainfall amounts of2.0, 3.0, 3.5, 3.75, and 4.0 inches were used for the 2-, 10-, 25-, 50-, and JOO-year storms design storms in the SBUH model. Modeling Results Details of each subbasin modeled in Stormshed are presented in Appendix A. I for the easterly basin and in Appendix A.2 for the westerly basin. Model results for routing the design storm hydrographs through the drainage networks are presented in Tables 8.1 through 8.12 of Appendix B. Table 6 presents a summary of flow rates at key locations in each of the conveyance systems. A summary of predicted flooding, for all surveyed structures, including open channels, is provided in Table 8.6 for the easterly basin and in Table 8.12 for the westerly basin.· The locations and return periods of flooding related to pipes and culverts are identified in Figure 4. Many of the driveway culverts and pipes along 1601h A venue SE flood at a return period of 2-years (Table 8.6 and Figure 4). Several reaches of ditch also overtop at this return period, likely as a result of constrictions in the pipe capacities. Modeling results are consistent with drainage complaints from residents along this reach of the drainage course. Similar modeling results were obtained for the westerly drainage course, where several culverts and catch basins were predicted to overtop at 2-year or I 0-year return periods (Table 8.12 and Figure 4). Conclusions Several flooding locations with return periods of 2°years were identified in the downstream conveyance systems. Flooding in the east basin that overtops and inundates 160th Avenue SE is considered a severe road flooding problem by the King County 3 . ·I Surface Water Drainage MamJal. Residential structures have been flooded at 14028 160th Avenue SE and at 16046 SE 142"d Place. If the finished space or the electrical/heating components of these residential structures were flooded in the past, the flooding would be classified as a severe problem. Otherwise, flooding that occurs at these residences is considered a nuisance problem. Channel erosion observed along the east boundary of the property at 16046 SE 14200 Place, downstream from Pipe P-110, has been a persistent problem over the past several years and would likely be considered a severe erosion problem. Continued bank erosion is likely at this location, with potential for reducing the capacity of channel sections further downstream where sediment is deposited. The flooding that occurs at the adjacent residence is likely related to the reduction in channel capacity due to sediment deposition from the eroded banks. Based on modeling results and information available, flooding problems in the westerly basin would likely be classified as nuisance problems by the King Caunty Surface Water Drainage Manual (1998). We found no documentation indicating that 156th Avenue SE or residential structures along the westerly drainage course have flooded in the past. However, a drainage complaint (Complaint No. 97-0318) related to flooding due to a plugged culvert, was not available for review (Haozous Engineering, June 2001 ). Proposed Mitigations Level 2 RID standards are currently being proposed for new development in the westerly basin of the Evendell Plat. No additional flow control or other mitigations are therefore required in this basin to reduce project impacts to nuisance flooding problems. Level 2 RID standards are also currently being proposed for new development in the easterly basin of the Evendell Plat. With severe flooding and severe erosion problems located in the downstream drainage course, additional measures to mitigate drainage impacts could be required. For the severe road flooding problem along 160th Avenue SE either of the following mitigations could be required: • Providing Level 3 detention in the easterly basin, OR • Upgrading the downstream conveyance system along 160th Avenue SE to eliminate road flooding. This would likely entail replacing driveway culverts P-117 and P- 116 on the west side of 160th Avenue SE, cross culvert P-115, and pipes P-114 and P-113 on the east side ofl60th Avenue SE (Figure 4). For the severe erosion problem along the east boundary of the property at 16046 SE 142nd Place, the Level 2 RID standards provide the mitigation required by code. Other types of mitigations to reduce erosion at this location, such as bank stabilization in the eroded section of channel or Level 3 RID standards, can be imposed through the King Caunty Surface Water Drainage Manual under certain circumstances. It is our opinion that either stabilizing the eroding section of channel or the use of Level 3 RID standards would mitigate project-related drainage impacts that occur at this location. 4 :·I References Haozous Engineering, June 15, 2001. Evendel/ Plat -Preliminary Technical Information Report. Renton, Wash. King County Department of Natural Resources, 1998. King County Surface Water Design Manual. Seattle. King County Department of Natural Resources, 1997. Lawer Cedar River Basin and Nonpoint Pollution Action Plan. Seattle. King County Department of Parks, Planning, and Resources, 1990. Sensitive Areas Map Folio. Seattle. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1973. Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington. Seattle. 6 ;·I Table I. Sumary of Surveyed Structures iu Downstream System Reach ID Reach Pipe Dia. Manning's Length UpstrIE Dwnst IE Slope Type (IN) n (FT) (FT) (FT) (%) East Basin D-llO X-Section 0.035 48 408.54 407.59 1.99 D-ll 1 X-Scction 0.035 58 409.57 408.54 1.78 D-ll2 X-Scction 0.035 20 411.25 409.57 8.57 D-113 X-Scction 0.035 12 411.86 411.25 5.28 D-114 X-Section 0.035 48 412.96 411.86 2.31 P-110 Circular 24 O.OIO 60 413.6 412.96 1.06 D-115 X-Section 0.035 3 414.27 413.6 25.24 OsJJ6 X-Scction 0.035 33 415.1 414.27 2.48 D-ll7 X-Section 0.035 24 415.34 415.1 1.01 D-ll8 X-Section 0.035 25 417.07 415.34 7.01 D-119 X-Section 0.035 48 419.77 417.07 5.61 D-120 X-Scction 0.035 79 420.05 419.77 0.35 P-111 Circular 18 0.013 29 419.3 420.05 -2.56 D-121 X-Section 0.035 6 421.94 419.3 45.68 D-122 X-Section 0.035 24 422.17 421.94 0.96 P-ll2 Circular 12 0.013 85 423.42 422.17 1.47 D-123 X-Section 0.035 43 424.16 423.42 1.73 D-124 X-Section 0.065 90 424.6 424.16 0.49 D-125 X-Section 0.065 107 426.13 424.6 1.43 D-126 X-Section 0.065 48 428.17 426.13 4.27 D-127 X-Section 0.035 79 429.74 428.17 1.99 D-128 X-Section 0.035 56 431.36 429.74 2.87 P-113 Circular 18 0.01 124 434.95 431.36 2.91 D-129 X-Section 0.035 12 434.81 434.95 -1.21 D-130 X-Section 0.035 61 436.28 434.81 2.40 D-131 X-Section 0.035 66 439.1 436.28 4.30 P-114 Circular 24 0.024 21 439.59 439.1 2.37 D-132 X-Scction 0.035 IO 440.26 439.59 7.02 P-115 Circular 12 0.013 45 441.31 439.59 3.78 D-133 X-Section 0.035 2 441.15 441.31 -7.30 D-133A X-Scction 0.035 35 442.14 441.15 2.80 D-134 X-Section 0.035 50 443.4 442.14 2.53 D-135 X-Section 0.035 106 444.67 443.4 1.20 D-136 X-Scction 0.035 54 445.89 444.67 2.25 P-116 Circular 18 0.024 28 446.34 445.89 1.62 D-137 X-Section 0.035 3 446.6 446.34 10.15 D-138 X-Section 0.035 88 448.4 446.6 2.04 D-139 X-Section 0.035 106 451.13 448.4 2.58 D-140 X-Section 0.035 55 452.3 451.13 2.15 P-117 Circular 12 0.013 18 452.9 452.3 3.39 D-141 X-Section 0.035 3 452.65 452.9 -9.42 D-142 X-Section 0.035 102 454.76 452.65 2.07 D-143 X-Section 0.035 160 459.46 454.76 2.93 D-144 X-Section 0.035 I03 462.79 459.46 3.24 D-145 X-Section 0.035 100 466.72 462.79 3.92 Table 1 ( continued) Reach ID Reach Pipe Dia. Manning's Length UpstrIE DwnstIE Slope Type (IN) n (FT) (FT) (FT) (%) West Basin P-001 Circular 12 0.013 113 378.62 372.66 5.27 D-001 X-Section 0.035 3 379.22 378.62 20.00 D-002 X-Section 0.035 114 381.68 379.22 2.16 D-003 X-Section 0.035 153 388.9 381.68 4.72 D-004 X-Section 0.035 157 397.4 388.9 5.41 D-005 X-Section 0.035 2 396.77 397.4 -31.50 P-002 Circular 12 0.013 25 397.51 396.77 2.96 D-006 X-Section 0.035 3 398.49 397.51 32.67 D-007 X-Section 0.035 35 399.58 398.49 3.11 P-003 Circular 12 0.013 19 400.17 399.58 3.11 D-008 X-Section 0.035 2 400.4 400.17 11.50 D-009 X-Section 0.035 36 400.91 400.4 1.42 P-004 Circular 12 0.013 59 403.71 400.91 4.75 P-005 Circular 12 0.013 9 404.21 403.51 7.78 P-006 Circular 12 0.013 42 406.09 404.26 4.36 P-007 Circular 12 0.013 150 411.17 406.34 3.22 P-008 Circular 12 0.013 157 417.58 411.77 3.70 P-008A Circular 12 0.013 28 418.1 417.58 l.86 P-009 Circular 12 0.013 142 427.25 420.75 4.58 P-010 Circular 12 0.013 86 431.9 427.35 5.29 P-011 Circular 12 0.013 62 434.34 432 3.77 P-012 Circular 12 0.013 33 435.68 434.39 3.91 D-010 X-Section 0.035 3 436.07 435.68 13.00 D-011 X-Section 0.035 48 438.87 436.07 5.83 D-012 X-Section 0.035 53 442.78 438.87 7.38 P-013 Circular 12 0.013 19 444.46 442.78 8.84 D-014 X-Section 0.035 3 444.63 444.46 5.67 D-015 X-Section 0.035 43 446.52 444.63 4.40 P-014 Circular 12 0.013 23 447.67 446.52 5.00 D-016 X-Section 0.035 3 448.08 447.67 13.67 D-017 X-Section 0.035 57 450.3 448.08 3.89 P-015 Circular 12 0.013 22 451.33 450.3 4.68 D-018 X-Section 0.035 3 451.83 451.33 16.67 D-019 X-Section 0.035 52 454.6 451.83 5.33 P-016 Circular 12 0.013 34 457.55 454.6 8.68 D-020 X-Section 0.035 3 457.71 457.55 5.33 D-021 X-Section 0.035 107 465.05 457.71 6.86 Table 2. Summary ofExistiug Basiu Cover Types by Subbasiu Curve Number= Subbasin East Basin cl e2 e3 e4 e5 c6 c7 Site -East Subtotal West Basin wl w2 w3 w4 w5 w6 w7 w8 Site - West Subtotal 81 0 85 0 1ill-forest Till-pasture (AC) (AC) -5.8 6.0 5.2 -1.7 -- 4.0 1.8 14.9 3.5 1.8 - 8.9 2.2 35.6 20.2 -- -0.7 -- -- -- 0.8 - 1.6 - 3.8 4.9 0.4 1.4 6.6 7.0 98 0 86 0 98 0 Cover Type Wetland 1ill-grass lmperv (AC) (AC) (AC) 12.0 1.9 15.6 7.0 0.7 0.1 0.9 0.2 12.3 5.4 9.8 2.3 -- 0.4 -0.1 0.4 51.4 16.9 2.3 0.6 13.8 1.8 1.0 0.2 2.7 0.5 1.8 0.4 1.8 1.3 3.8 2.4 0.4 0.0 --0.1 -27.6 7.2 Total (AC) 19.7 33.9 2.4 I. I 23.5 30.4 1.8 11.6 124.5 2.9 16.3 1.2 3.2 2.2 3.8 7.8 9.1 1.9 48.4 '..;... Table 3. Summary of Land Uses by Subbasin Subbasin · Forest ·(AC) East Basin el - e2 6.0 e3 - e4 - e5 4.0 e6 14.9 e7 1.8 Site -East 8.9 Total 35.6 West Basin wl - w2 - w3 - w4 - w5 - w6 0.8 w7 . 1.6 w8 3.8 Site -West 0.4 Total 6.5 % Grass % lm_eerv Pasture (,4C) 5.8 5.2 1.7 - 1.8 3.5 - 2.2 20.2 - 0.7 - - - - - 4.9 1.4 7.0 92.5% 7.5% SFJ (AC)· 4.5 2.1 0.8 - - 4.7 - 0.1 12.1 - 14.5 - - - - 0.6 0.4 0.1 15.6 83.5% 16.5% SF2 (AC) 9.5 6.7 - 1.1 7.9 4.5 - 29.8 2.6 - 1.2 3.2 2.2 - - - 9.2 58.4% 41.6% SF6 (AC) - 13.8 - - 9.8 2.8 - 26.4 - - - - - 3.0 5.6 - 8.6 0.0% 100.0% Wetland . (AC) 0.4 Notes: SF!= Single-family residential with 1 DU/Ac; SF2 = 2 DU/Ac; SF6 = 6 DU/Ac 36.0% 64.0% · Church (AC) - - - - - - - - 0.3 I.I - - - - - - 1.4 Total (AC) 19.7 33.9 2.4 1.1 23.5 . 30.4 1.8 11.6 124.4 2.9 16.3 1.2 3.2 2.2 3.8 7.8 9.1 1.9 48.3 Table 4. Curve Numbers for Subbasins Subbasin Pervious Pervious Jmperv CN (AC) (AC) East Basin el 85.7 17.8 1.9 e2 84.7 26.9 7.0 e3 85.3 2.3 0.1 e4 86.0 0.9 0.2 e5 84.8 18.1 5.4 e6 · · 83.2 28.1 2.3 e7 81.0 1.8 - Site -East 81.8 I I.I 0.5 West Basin wl 86.0 2.3 0.6 w2 86.0 14.5 1.8 w3 86.0 1.0 0.2 w4 86.0 2.7 0.5 w5 86.0 1.8 0.4 w6 84.5 2.5 1.3 w7 84.5 5.4 2.4 w8 83.4 9.0 0.0 Site - West 84.0 1.8 0.1 Table 5. Travel Path Distances and Slopes for Pervious Land Areas SheetF/uw ·, Delta · . Shalluw·Fluw •·. Delta.\\. ···,.· . Channel Fluw · Delta . . .·. ,,'.,, , ,-• ,·; __ ,_ ·' .":'·_ ·,·;'.c_' Subbasin · ' Distance ' Elev. Slop~ Distance · Elev. · . ., : ; .. Slope Distance Elev. Slope ., (F1) (FT) ,• > '(FT/Fl) _;, ;(F:1) (Fl) (FT/FT) (Fl) (Fl) (FT/Fl) East Basin el 300.0 5.0 0.017 1,484.0 20.0 0.013 950.0 10.0 0.011 e2 300.0 5.0 0.017 922.0 15.0 0.016 1,824.0 18.0 0.010 e3 300.0 5.0 0.017 264.0 3.0 0.011 106.0 3.0 0.028 e4 300.0 5.0 0.017 200.0 4.0 0.020 e5 300.0 8.0 0.027 1,248.0 23.0 0.018 705.0 10.0 0.014 e6 300.0 3.0 0.010 1,777.0 35.0 0.020 e7 300.0 3.0 0.010 Site -East 300.0 3.0 0.010 876.0 13.0 0.015 West Basin wl 2,610.0 70.0 0.027 w2 300.0 5.0 0.017 585.0 70.0 0.120 w3 300.0 32.0 0.107 272.0 13.0 0.048 w4 300.0 10.0 0.033 292.0 22.0 0.075 w5 300.0 30.0 0.100 322.0 22.0 0.068 w6 300.0 2.0 0.007 613.0 40.0 0.065 w7 300.0 20.0 0.067 655.0 40.0 0.061 w8 300.0 20.0 0.067 1,020.0 70.0 0.069 Site - West 210.0 10.0 0.048 ~ Table 6. Peak Flow Rates at Selected Locations. Storm Return Period Location · 2-Year JO-year 25-Year 50-Year JOO-Year (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) East Basin P-110 12.0 24.5 31.6 35.3 38.9 P-111 12.1 24.9 32.0 35.6 39.4 P-112 9.9 20.0 25.5 28.3 31.2 P-113 10.2 20.3 25.9 28.7 31.6 P-114 10.2 20.4 25.9 28.8 31.7 P-115 7.4 15.2 19.4 21.6 23.8 P-116 7.3 14.9 19.l 21.2 23.4 West Basin P-001 6.8 13.7 17.5 19.4 21.2 P-002 6.2 12.2 15.4 17.0 18.6 P-006 4.8 9.6 12.2 13.5 14.7 P-008A 4.1 8.4 10.8 I 1.9 13.I P-009 3.8 7.7 9.8 10.9 I 1.9 P-013 3.2 6.7 8.5 9.4 10.4 P-015 3.0 6.2 8.0 8.8 9.7 P-016 2.8 5.7 7.3 8.1 8.9 Note: Flow rates are those predicted by Stonnshed using the SBUH method. ·1 ~I -~ _"• . .....:..;,;_ \ • •SE••""·,-.• : . . ; . . . .. \ ..... o"' : •••••• ::, 0 ' . '...."·· : SOURCE: USGS 7.5 x 15 Minute Series -Renton, Washington SCALE: 1 :25 000 TITLE PAGE \'\ \: Figure 1. Vicinity Map 1-5 01/03101 > / " ,: ·~ -<.· o 200 •oo be er+*' *" I SCALE IN Fttl u \ ~:ir-~ el ,/''[ tEVENDELL ;,;.,..,-,,,...,..~',',-..::.,·· 1 exe"~~t 1 /<9.3 AC> Haozous Engineering CIVll. ENGINEERING 14816 SE 116TH ST, RENTON, VA 98~9 425-233-2707 _ .. ''"" ""' 8/12/02 ....... ..,., ..... B/12/02 i i/ ,/\ '\. ---~-'.-.. i \ J> .. , .. / !' ,·, l' \ ~·'" "~ ',, '\ ""'I i\ ·,,., \,,. /"1, \. '\.\ \,~ ! ( \ \ ~ ii \ ,,,. •.. I \ '· '\ ,i ,, \ '., i SITE !S 9% OF TRIBUTARY•.ARE:A I --~ \ . \ / \ " ' PROJECT NO. EVENDELL PLAT AG\/ Drainage Basins 2 I 0 200 .. oo L , . ')*'* l == SCAL£ lN rtE:T ' ' ' > - ' Haozous Engineering PROJECT NO, CIVIL ENGll£ERJNG EVENDELL PLAT / 14816 SE U6TH ST, RENTON, \JA 980"9 425-235-2707 _ .. .. ,., FlGU ~ ..... B/12/02. Land Use/Cover Types 3 ........ .. ,., .-:':· .. £JM 8/12/02 d"• 8-, . ... ... Ls 5 ;;;a1ws+ ,aw;.~ SCAL£ IN FttT LEGEND c Co. tch Bo.sin P5 Pipe ID ~0-Yeo.r I Flooding Return Period llaOZOWII Engineering CIVL .ca HAI..S 14816 IE 06TH Sf., IIDflllN. VA tall99J e es ax, OtSICNED BY: OATE: DATE: ,V,l/lll EVENDEI.J.. PLAT I I i ' ,,,j . ""j ! I ... i Flooding Locations PROJECT NO. f'ICURE 4 Appendix A.1. Subbasin Summary-East Basin Drainage Area: e-001 Hyd Method: SBUH Hyd Peak Factor: 484.00 Storm Dur: 24.00 hrs Area CN Pervious 17.8000 ac 85. 70 Impervious 1.9000 ac 98.00 Total 19.7000 ac Pervious CN Data: Subbasin e-001 Perv Impervious CN Data: Subbasin el Imperv Pervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Sheet e I sheet Shallow e I shallow Channel e I channel Impervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Fixed None Entered 85.70 98.00 Loss Method: SCS CN Number SCS Abs: Intv: 0.20 10.00 min TC 0.98 hrs 0.17 hrs 17.8000 ac 1.9000 ac Length: Slope: 300.00 ft 1.70% 1484.00 ft 1.50% 950.00 ft 1.10% Length: Slope: 0.00 ft 0.00% Coeff: Travel Time 0.1500 31.85 min 11.0000 18.36 min 17.0000 8.88 min Coeff: Travel Time 10.0000 10.00 min :-1 Drainage Area: e-002 Hyd Method: SBUHHyd Peak Factor: 484.00 Storm Dur: 24.00 hrs Area Pervious 26.9000 ac Impervious 7.0000 ac Total 33.9000 ac Pervious CN Data: Subbasin e-002 Perv Impervious CN Data: Subbasin el Imperv Pervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Sheet e2 sheet Shallow e2 shallow Channel e2 channel Impervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Fixed None Entered CN 84.70 98.00 84.70 98.00 Loss Method: SCS CN Number SCS Abs: 0.20 lntv: 10.00 min TC 1.01 hrs 0.17hrs 26.9000 ac 7.0000ac Length: Slope: 300.00 ft I. 70% 922.00 ft 1.60% 1824.00 ft 1.00% Length: Slope: 0.00 ft 0.00% Coeff: Travel Time 0.1500 31.85 min 11.0000 11.04 min 17.0000 17.88 min Coeff: Travel Time 10.0000 10.00 min ' :·\ Drainage Area: e-003 Hyd Method: SBUHHyd Loss Method: SCS CN Number Peak Factor: 484.00 SCS Abs: 0.20 Storm Dur: 24.00 hrs Intv: 10.00 min Area CN TC Pervious 2.3000 ac 85.30 0.60 hrs Impervious 0.1000 ac 98.00 0.17hrs Total 2.4000 ac Pervious CN Data: Subbasin e-003 Perv 85.30 2.3000 ac Impervious CN Data: Subbasin e3 Imperv 98.00 O.IOOOac Pervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time Sheet e3 sheet 300.00 ft I. 70"/o 0.1500 31.85 min Shallow e3 shallow 264.00 ft 1.10% 11.0000 3.81 min Channel e3 channel 106.00 ft 2.80% 17.0000 0.62 min Impervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time Fixed None Entered 0.00 ft 0.00"/o 10.0000 10.00min Drainage Area: e-004 Hyd Method: SBUHHyd Loss Method: SCS CN Number Peak Factor: 484.00 SCS Abs: 0.20 Storm Dur: 24.00 hrs Intv: 10.00 min Area CN TC Pervious 0.9000 ac 86.00 0.55 hrs Impervious 0.2000 ac 98.00 0.17 hrs Total 1.1000 ac Pervious CN Data: Subbasin e-004 Perv 86.00 0.9000 ac Impervious CN Data: Subbasin e4 Imperv 98.00 0.2000 ac Pervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time Sheet e4 sheet 300.00 ft 1.70% 0.1500 31.85 min Channel e4 channel 200.00 ft 2.00% 17.0000 1.39 min Impervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time Fixed None Entered 0.00 ft 0.00% 10.0000 10.00 min ) Drainage Area: e-005 Hyd Method: SBUH Hyd . Peak Factor: 484.00 Storm Dur: 24.00 hrs Area CN Pervious 18.1000 ac 84.80 Impervious 5.4000 ac 98.00 Total 23.5000 ac Pervious CN Data: Subbasin e-005 Perv Impervious CN Data: Subbasin es Imperv Pervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Sheet eS sheet Shallow eS shallow Sheet eS channel Impervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Fixed None Entered 84.80 98.00 Loss Method: SCS CN Number SCS Abs: 0.20 Intv: 10.00 min TC 1.81 hrs 0.17 hrs 18.1000 ac 5.4000 ac Length: Slope: 300.00 ft 2.70% 1248.00 ft 1.80% 705. 00 ft 1.40% Length: Slope: 0.00 ft 0.00% Coeff: 0.1500 Travel Time 26.47 min 11.0000 14.09 min 0.1500 68.19 min Coeff: Travel Time 10.0000 10.00 min Drainage Area: e-006 Hyd Method: SBUH Hyd Peak Factor: 484.00 Storm Dur: 24.00 hrs Area CN Pervious 28.1000 ac 83 .20 Impervious 2.3000 ac 98.00 Total 3 0 .4000 ac Pervious CN Data: Subbasin e-006 Perv Impervious CN Data: Subbasin e5 Imperv Pervious TC Data: 83.20 98.00 Flow type: Description: Length: Sheet e6 sheet Shallow e6 shallow Impervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Fixed None Entered Loss Method: SCS CN Number SCS Abs: Intv: TC 1.35 hrs 0.17 hrs 28.1000 ac 2.3000 ac 0.20 10.00 min Slope: Coeff: Travel Time 300.00 ft 1.00% 0.1500 39.38 min 1777.00 ft 2.00% 5.0000 41.88 min Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time 0.00 ft 0.00% 10.0000 10.00 min ., Drainage Area: e-007 Hyd Method: SBUHHyd Loss Method: SCS CN Number Peak Factor: 484.00 SCS Abs: 0.20 Storm Dur: 24.00 hrs Intv: 10.00 min Area CN TC Pervious 1.8000 ac 81.00 1.44 hrs Impervious 0.0000 ac 98.00 0.00 hrs Total 1.8000 ac Pervious CN Data: Subbasin e-007 Perv 81.00 1.8000 ac Pervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time Sheet e7 sheet 300.00 ft 1.00% 0.4000 86.31 min Drainage Area: ex_east Hyd Method: SBUHHyd Loss Method: SCS CN Number Peak Factor: 484.00 SCS Abs: 0.20 Storm Dur: 24.00 hrs lntv: 10.00 min Area CN TC Pervious 11.1000 ac 81.80 2.lOhrs Impervious 0.5000 ac 98.00 0.17hrs Total 11.6000 ac Pervious CN Data: Subbasin ex_ east Perv 81.80 11.1000 ac Impervious CN Data: Subbasin ex_ east Imperv 98.00 0.5000 ac Pervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time Sheet ex east sheet 300.00 ft 1.00% 0.4000 86.31 min Shallow ex east shallow 876.00 ft 1.50% 3.0000 39.74 min Impervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time Fixed None Entered 0.00 ft 0.00% 10.0000 10.00 min Appendix A.2. Subbasin Summary-West Basin Drainage Area: w-001 Hyd Method: SBUHHyd Peak Factor: 484.00 Storm Dur: 24.00 hrs Area Pervious 2.3000 ac Impervious 0.6000 ac Total 2.9000 ac Pervious CN Data: Subbasin wl Perv Impervious CN Data: Subbasin wl Pervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Time Channel wl Impervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Time Fixed wl CN 86.00 98.00 86.00 98.00 Loss Method: SCS CN Number SCS Abs: 0.20 Intv: 10.00 min TC 0.26 hrs 0.17hrs 2.3000 ac 0.6000 ac Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel 2610.00 ft 2.70% 17.0000 15.57 min Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel 0.00 ft 0.00% 10.0000 10.00 min , :·1 Drainage Area: w-002 Hyd Method: SBUHHyd Loss Method: SCS CN Number Peak Factor: 484.00 SCS Abs: 0.20 Storm Dur: 24.00 hrs Intv: 10.00 min Area CN TC Pervious 14.5000 ac 86.00 0.57 hrs Impervious 1.8000 a:c 98.00 0.17hrs Total 16.3000 ac Pervious CN Data: Subbasin w2 Perv 86.00 14.5000 ac Impervious CN Data: Subbasin w2 Imperv 98.00 1.8000 ac Pervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time Sheet None Entered 300.00 ft 1.70"/o 0.1500 31.85 min Shallow None Entered 585.00 ft 12.00% 11.0000 2.56 min Impervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time Fixed None Entered 0.00 ft 0.00% 10.0000 10.00 min Drainage Area: w-003 Hyd Method: SBUHHyd Loss Method: SCS CN Number Peak Factor: 484.00 SCS Abs: 0.20 Storm Dur: 24.00 hrs Intv: 10.00 min Area CN TC Pervious 1.0000 ac 86.00 0.27hrs Impervious 0.2000 ac 98.00 0.17hrs Total 1.2000 ac Pervious CN Data: Subbasin w3 Perv 86.00 1.0000 ac Impervious CN Data: Subbasin w3 Imperv 98.00 0.2000 ac Pervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time Sheet w3 sheet 300.00 ft 10.70% 0.1500 15.26 min Channel w3 channel 272.00 ft 4.80% 17.0000 1.22 min Impervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time Fixed None Entered 0.00 ft 0.00% 10.0000 10.00 min ·1 Drainage Area: w-004 Hyd Method: SBUHHyd Loss Method: SCS CN Number Peak Factor: 484.00 SCS Abs: 0.20 Storm Dur: 24.00 hrs Intv: 10.00 min Area CN TC Pervious 2.7000 ac 86.00 0.43 hrs Impervious 0.5000 ac 98.00 0.17 hrs Total 3.2000 ac Pervious CN Data: Subbasin w4 Perv 86.00 2.7000 ac Impervious CN Data: Subbasin w4 98.00 0.5000 ac Pervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time Sheet w4 sheet 300.00 ft 3.30% 0.1500 24.43 min Shallow w4 shallow 292.00 ft 7.50% 11.0000 1.62 min Impervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time Fixed None Entered 0.00 ft 0.00% 10.0000 10.00 min Drainage Area: w-005 Hyd Method: SBUHHyd Peak Factor: 484.00 Storm Dur: 24.00 hrs Area CN Pervious 1.8000 ac 86.00 Impervious 0.4000 ac 98.00 Total 2.2000 ac Pervious CN Data: Subbasin wS Perv 86.00 Impervious CN Data: Subbasin wS 98.00 Pervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Length: Sheet w5 sheet Shallow wS shallow Impervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Time Fixed None Entered Loss Method: SCS CN Number SCS Abs: 0.20 Intv: 10.00 min TC 0.29 hrs 0.17hrs 1.8000 ac 0.4000 ac Slope: Coeff: Travel Time 300.00 ft 10.00% 0.1500 15.68 min 322.00 ft 6.80% 11.0000 1.87 min Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel 0.00 ft 0.00% 10.0000 10.00 min :·1 Drainage Area: w-006 Hyd Method: SBUHHyd Loss Method: SCS CN Number Peak Factor: 484.00 SCS Abs: 0.20 Storm Dur: 24.00 hrs Intv: 10.00 min Area CN TC Pervious 2.5000 ac 84.50 0.82 hrs Impervious 1.3000 ac 98.00 0.17 hrs Total 3.8000 ac Pervious CN Data: Subbasin w6 Perv 84.50 2.5000 ac Impervious CN Data: Subbasinw6 98.00 1.3000 ac Pervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time Sheet w6 sheet 300.00 ft 0.70% 0.1500 45.42 min Shallow w6 shallow 613.00 ft 6.50% 11.0000 3.64 min Impervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time Fixed None Entered 0.00 ft 0.00% 10.0000 10.00 min Drainage Area: w-007 Hyd Method: SBUHHyd Peak Factor: 484.00 Storm Dur: 24.00 hrs Area CN Pervious 5.4000 ac 84.50 Impervious 2.4000 ac 98.00 Total 7.8000 ac Pervious CN Data: Subbasin w7 Perv 84.50 Impervious CN Data: Subbasin w7 98.00 Pervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Time Sheet w7 sheet Shallow w7 shallow Impervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Time Fixed None Entered Loss Method: SCS CN Number SCS Abs: 0.20 Intv: 10.00 min TC 0.53 hrs 0. 17 hrs 5.4000 ac 2.4000 ac Length: Slope: Coeff: 300.00 ft 6.10% 0.2400 655.00 ft 6.10% 11.0000 Length: Slope: Coeff: 0.00 ft 0.00% 10.0000 Travel 27.83 min 4.02 min Travel 10.00 min ' .. , Drainage Area: w-008 Hyd Method: SBUHHyd Peak Factor: 484.00 Stonn Dur: 24.00 hrs Area Pervious 9.0000 ac Impervious 0.0000 ac Total 9.0000 ac Pervious CN Data: Subbasin w8 Perv Pervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Time Sheet w8 sheet Shallow w8 shallow Impervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Time Fixed None Entered CN 83.40 0.00 83.40 Loss Method: SCS CN Number SCS Abs: 0.20 lntv: 10.00 min TC 0.79 hrs 0.17 hrs 9.0000 ac Length: Slope: 300.00 ft 6.70% 1020.00 ft 6.90% Length: Slope: 0.00 ft 0.00% Coetf: Travel 0.4000 40.33 min 9.0000 7.19 min Coeff: Travel 10.0000 10.00 min Drainage Area: ex_west Hyd Method: SBUH Hyd Peak Factor: 484. 00 Storm Dur: 24.00 hrs Area Pervious 1. 8000 ac Impervious 0.1000 ac Total 1. 9000 ac Pervious CN Data: Subbasin ex_ west Perv Impervious CN Data: Subbasin ex_ west Imperv Pervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Time Sheet ex west sheet Impervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Time Fixed wl CN 84.00 98.00 84.00 98.00 Loss Method: SCS CN Number SCS Abs: lntv: TC 0.38 hrs 0.17 hrs 1.8000 ac 0.1000 ac 0.20 10.00 min Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel 210.00 ft 4.80% 0.2400 23.02 min Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel 0.00 ft 0.00% 10.0000 10.00 min , :·1 Table B.1. Hydrograph Routing -East Basin -2-YearStorrn ROUTEHYD a THRU (Existing East] USING TYPE1A AND (2 yr] NOTZERO ACTUAL Reach Area Flow Full Q % Full nDepth Size nVel Nel CBasin I Hyd ac cfs cfs ratio fl ft/s ft/s ------------ D-Dum2 19.7 2.1303 122.33 0.02 0.3312 X-Sect 3.0688 ----e-001 D-Dum1 53.6 6.625 122.33 0.05 0.5728 X-Sect 4.4532 -----e-002 0-145 53.6 6.5953 121.12 0.05 0.5744 X-Sect 4.4169 ---- 0-144 53.6 6.5642 117.92 0.06 0.6659 X-Sect 4.3432 ----- D-143 53.6 6.5478 122.41 0.05 0.6381 X-Sect 4.0213 ----- D-142 53.6 6.5467 82.3869 0.08 0.6881 X-Sect 3.5759 --- D-141 53.6 6.5465 10.3949 0.63 1.6141 X-Sect 1.1146 --- P-117 65.2 7.0246 6.5804 1.07 0.9037 12" Diam 9.4073 8.3784 ex_east D-140 65.2 7.0224 124.5 0.06 0.4782 X-Sect 3.1305 ----- 0-139 65.2 7.018 117.81 0.06 0.4685 X-Sect 3.4675 ----- 0-138 65.2 7.013 94.8108 0.07 0.6314 X-Sect 3.4413 ----- D-137 67.6 7.2807 279 0.03 0.4113 X-Sect 5.3323 -----e-003 P-116 67.6 7.2787 7.2535 1 1.2342 18" Diam 4.6787 4.1046 D-136 67.6 7.2745 61.7242 0.12 0.6832 X-Sect 3.5858 ----- D-135 67.6 7.2645 66.6905 0.11 0. 7836 X-Sect 2.9393 --- D-134 67.6 7.2596 70.9939 0.1 0.5719 X-Sect 3.6244 ---- D-133A 67.6 7.2557 93.7984 0.08 0.6719 X-Sect 3.6325 ----- D-133 67.6 7.2549 26.6671 0.27 1.4156 X-Sect 1.1841 ----- P-115 68.7 7.4254 6.9473 1.07 0.9067 12" Diam 9.9203 8.8456 e-004 D-132 68.7 7.4237 226.87 0.03 0.5902 X-Sect 5.7063 ---- P-114 92.2 10.2247 18.9199 0.54 1.0474 24" Diam 6.1392 6.0224 e-005 D-131 92.2 10.2216 338.51 0.03 0.5631 X-Sect 4.9185 --- 0-130 92.2 10.2183 33.2703 0.31 0.8395 X-Sect 4.3224 ----- 0-129 92.2 10.2164 8.6723 1.18 -1 X-Sect 1.178 ----- P-113 92.2 10.212 23.5738 0.43 0.6902 18" Diam 12.8615 13.34 D-128 92.2 10.2081 266.41 0.04 0.6392 X-Secl 4.3565 ---- D-127 92.2 10.1973 1354.11 0.01 0.6263 X-Sect 2.0863 ---- D-126 92.2 10.1853 491.48 0.02 0.3323 X-Sect 1.4977 ----- D-125 92.2 10.132 3470.27 0 0.3539 X-Sect 0.8642 ----- 0-124 92.2 9.9841 549.84 0.02 0.2991 X-Sect 0.5983 ----- D-123 92.2 9.9643 3827.85 0 0.4105 X-Sect 1.946 --- P-112 92.2 9.9216 4.3371 2.29 -1 12" Diam 2.2876 5.5221 D-122 92.2 9.9128 50.2681 0.2 0.904 X-Sect 2.771 ----- 0-121 122.6 12.0698 594.02 0.02 0.2893 X-Sect 10 .2968 ----e-006 P-111 122.6 12.0648 15.3148 0.79 1.0036 18" Diam 9.6013 8.6664 D-120 122.6 12.0245 18.2879 0.66 1.4658 X-Sect 2.1936 ----- D-119 122.6 12.0107 17.5281 0.69 0.6067 X-Sect 4.6997 ----- D-118 122.6 12.0027 179.94 0.07 0.4436 X-Sect 5.2531 ----- D-117 122.6 11.9926 61.1492 0.2 1.0638 X-Sect 2.9017 ---- 0-116 122.6 11.9823 27.9865 0.43 1.096 X-Sect 4.2499 --- D-115 122.6 11.9814 78.2241 0.15 1.2007 X-Sect 4.2155 ---- P-110 122.6 11.972 30.6525 0.39 0.868 24" Diam 9.156 9.757 0-114 122.6 11.9572 47.75 0.25 1.1715 X-Sect 4.2164 ----- D-113 124.4 12.0112 319.76 0.04 0.6751 X-Sect 5.8978 ----e-007 D-112 124.4 12.0055 1134.16 0.01 0.5548 X-Sect 5.7484 ---- D-111 124.4 11.9853 413.21 0.03 0. 7639 X-Sect 3.7479 ----- D-110 124.4 11.9689 241.55 0.05 0'.698 X-Sect 3.9096 ---- Reh App Bend Junct HW Max El/ Loss Head Loss Loss Elev Rim El Fr Node To Node ft ft ft ft ft ft N-110 408.288 N-111 N-110 409.238 -na----na----na--409.238 411.92 N-112 N-111 409.9703 --na----na---na--409.9703 414.13 N-113 N-112 411.6608 -na----na----na--411.6607 415.64 N-114 N-113 412.5349 -na---na----na--412.5349 415.67 N-115 N-114 414.1314 --na----na---na--414.18 414.08 N-116 N-115 415.5033 --na----na----na--415.5033 416.5 N-117 N-116 415.5562 -na---na---na--415.5562 416.39 N-118 N-117 416.3861 -na--na--na-416.3861 416.39 N-119 N-118 416.626 --na----na----na--416.71 416.61 N-120 N-119 418.44 --na----na----na--418.24 418.14 N-121 N-120 420.9399 --na---na----na--420.43 420.33 N-122 N-121 421.5157 --na---na----na--421.5157 422.69 N-123 N-122 422. 9861 --na----na----na--422.9861 423.31 N-124 N-123 425.626 -na---na----na--423.41 423.31 N-125 N-124 423.64 -na--na----na--423.64 424.05 N-126 N-125 433.8967 -na---na----na--424.9 424.8 N-127 N-126 425.6399 --na---na---na--425.6399 426.02 N-128 N-127 426.0798 -na--na--na-426.0798 426.52 N-129 N-128 427 .6098 --na--na---na--427.6097 428.27 N-130 N-129 429.6497 --na----na----na-429.4 429.3 N-131 N-130 430.9699 -na--na---na--430.83 430.73 N-132 N-131 432.4499 -na--na--na-432.45 432.79 N-133 N-132 437.2623 --na----na----na--436.5 436.4 N-134 N-133 436.5119 --na----na---na--436.03 435.93 N-135 N-134 437.4999 -na--na---na--437.57 437.47 N-136 N-135 440.3899 --na---na---na--440.25 440.15 N-137 N-136 441.418 --na---na----na--441.418 442.1 N-137A N-137 442.088 --na----na----na--441.99 441.89 N-138 N-137A 445.5185 --na---na---na-442.9 442.8 N-139 N-138 442.9019 --na---na---na--442.9 442.8 N-140 N-139 443.8899 --na---na----na--443.14 443.04 N-141 N-140 444.3999 --na--. -na----na-444.3999 444.84 N-142 N-141 445.6699 --na---na---na--445.6699 446.11 N-143 N-142 446.8898 --na---na----na--446.8898 447.71 N-144 N-143 448.3436 -na----na----na--448.2 448.1 N-145 N-144 448.4599 --na---na--na-447.84 447.74 N-146 N-145 449.6399 --na----na----na-449.6399 449.84 N-147 N-146 452.3699 -na---na---na--452.3698 452.71 N-148 N-147 453.5398 -na--na----na-453.5398 453.89 N-149 N-148 456. 7368 --na---na--na-454.3 454.2 N-150 N-149 454.303 -na---na---na--454.3029 454.65 N-151 N-150 456.4129 --na---na--na-455.87 455.77 N-152 N-151 460.5699 --na---na---na-460.56 460.46 N-153 N-152 463.89 --na----na----na--463.89 464.17 N-154 N-153 467.8199 --na----na---na-467.44 467.34 Table B.2. Hydrograph Routing -East Basin -10-Year Storm ROUTEHYD D THRU (Existing East] USING TYPE1A AND (10 yr) NOTZERO ACTUAL Reach Area Flow Full Q %Full nDepth Size nVel Nel CBasin I Hyd ac els els ratio ft ft/s ft/s ------------ D-Dum2 19.7 4.4884 122.33 0.04 0.4719 X-Sect 3.935 -----e-001 D-Dum1 53.6 13.1058 122.33 0.11 0.81 X-Sect 5.5304 --e-002 0-145 53.6 13.1051 121.12 0.11 0.8142 X-Sect 5.4927 ----- D-144 53.6 13.1036 117.92 0.11 0.9649 X-Sect 5.2679 ----- D-143 53.6 13.1 122.41 0.11 0.9032 X-Sect 4.856 ----- 0-142 53.6 13.0953 82.3869 0.16 0.9821 X-Sect 4.3102 --- D-141 53.6 13.0948 10.3949 1.26 -1 X-Sect 1.2597 --- P-117 65.2 14.3238 6.5804 2.18 -1 12" Diam 2.1767 8.3784 ex_east D-140 65.2 14.3181 124.5 0.12 0.6926 X-Sect 3.9913 --- 0-139 65.2 14.3076 117.81 0.12 0.6891 X-Sect 4.3262 -- D-138 65.2 14.2973 94.8108 0.15 0.9065 X-Sect 4 .2086 ----- 0-137 67.6 14.8971 279 0.05 0.5622 X-Sect 6.5644 ----e-003 P-116 67.6 14.8875 7.2535 2.05 -1 18" Diam 2.0525 • 4.1046 D-136 67.6 14.8791 61.7242 0.24 0.9641 X-Sect 4.5155 ---- 0-135 67.6 14.86 66.6905 0.22 1.1209 X-Sect 3.6062 ----- 0-134 67.6 14.8509 70.9939 0.21 0.8189 X-Sect 4.472 --- D-133A 67.6 14.8437 93.7984 0.16 0.899 X-Sect 4.4767 ----- D-133 67.6 14.8424 26.6671 0.56 1.9795 X-Sect 1.4503- P-115 68.7 15.1643 6.9473 2.18 -1 12" Diam 2.1828 8.8456 e-004 D-132 68.7 15.1617 226.87 0.07 0.8315 X-Sect -7.0313- P-114 92.2 20.3817 18.9199 1.08 -1 24" Diam 1.0773 6.0224 e-005 D-131 92.2 20.3728 338.51 0.06 0.8183 X-Sect 6.0985 -- D-130 92.2 20.3642 33.2703 0.61 1.2093 X-Sect 5.2653 --- D-129 92.2 20.3511 8.6723 2.35 -1 X-Sect 2.3467 ---- P-113 92.2 20.3415 23.5738 0.86 1.07 49 18" Diam 15.0091 13.34 0-128 92.2 20.3328 266.41 0.08 0.9398 X-Sect 5.4109 ----- D-127 92.2 20.3088 1354.11 0.01 0. 7502 X-Sect 2.4283 ----- D-126 92.2 20.2866 491.48 0.04 0.428 X-Sect 1.9106 ----- 0-125 92.2 20.1873 3470.27 0.01 0.4582 X-Sect 1.0267 ---- D-124 92.2 20.03 549.84 0.04 0.4223 X-Sect 0.7679 ---- D-123 92.2 19.9985 3827.85 0.01 0.5331 X-Sect 2.3162 -- P-112 92.2 19.9587 4.3371 4.6 -1 12" Diam 4.6019 5.5221 0-122 92.2 19.9456 50.2681 0.4 1.2487 X-Sect 3.3192 ----- D-121 122.6 24.93 594.02 0.04 0.4161 X-Sect 13.223-e-006 P-111 122.6 24.8832 15.3148 1.62 -1 18" Diam 1.6248 8.6664 D-120 122.6 24.6416 18.2879 1.35 -1 X-Sect 1.3474 - 0-119 122.6 24.5438 17.5281 1.4 -1 X-Sect 1.4002 ---- D-118 122.6 24.5308 179.94 0.14 0.6339 X-Sect 6.562-- D-117 122.6 24.5144 61.1492 0.4 1.4223 X-Sect 3.6544 -- D-116 122.6 24.4971 27.9865 .0.88 1.4271 X-Sect 5.1474 ----- D-115 122.6 24.4955 78.2241 0.31 1.657 4 X-Sect 5.1522-- P-110 122.6 24.4801 30.6525 0.8 1.3515 24" Diam 10.8367 9.757 D-114 122.6 24.4557 47.75 0.51 1.5399 X-Sect 5.2816 -- D-113 124.4 24.6393 319.76 0.08 1.0057 X-Sect 7.2971 ----e-007 0-112 124.4 24.6301 1134.16 0.02 0.742 X-Sect 7.4221 - D-111 124.4 24.5979 413.21 0.06 1.1252 X-Sect 4.6448 --- D-110 124.4 24.5719 241.55 0.1 1.0455 X-Sect 4.8977 ----- Reh App Bend June! HW Max El/ Loss Head Loss Loss Elev Rim El Fr Node To Node ft ft ft ft ft ft N-110 408.6355 N-111 N-110 409.5854 --na----na----na--409.5854 411.92 N-112 N-111 410.6952 --na---na--na--410.6952 414.13 N-113 N-112 412.3751 -na--na----na--412.3751 415.64 N-114 N-113 412.985 --na----na----na--412.985 415.67 N-115 N-114 414.5504 -na--na--na--414.18 414.08 N-116 N-115 417.346 --na---na--na-416.6 416.5 N-117 N-116 416.6529 --na--na---na--416.49 416.39 N-118 N-117 417.3199 --na--na--na--416.49 416.39 N-119 N-118 416.7623 -na---na--na--416.71 416.61 N-120 N-119 418.4399 --na----na----na--418.24 418.14 N-121 N-120 420.9399 -na---na----na-420.43 420.33 N-122 N-121 421.3322 --na----na----na--421.3322 422.69 N-123 N-122 427. 5867 -na----na---na--423.41 423.31 N-124 N-123 426.0499 -na--na----na--423.41 423.31 N-125 N-124 423.6399 --na----na---na--423.64 424.05 N-126 N-125 465.1461 --na----na----na--424.9 424.8 N-127 N-126 425.6399 -na--na---na-425.6399 426.02 N-128 N-127 426.0798 -na--na--na-426.0798 426.52 N-129 N-128 427 .6098 -na----na---na-427.6097 428.27 N-130 N-129 429.6497 -na---na--na-429.4 429.3 N-131 N-130 430.9699 -na--na--na-430.83 430.73 N-132 N-131 432.4499 --na---na--na-432.45 432.79 N-133 N-132 441.2068 --na----na---na-436.5 436.4 N-134 N-133 436.5119 --na--na---na-436.03 435.93 N-135 N-134 437.4999 -na--na---na--437.57 437.47 N-136 N-135 440.3899 --na--na--na-440.25 440.15 N-137 N-136 442.9103 -na---na----na--442.2 442.1 N-137A N-137 442.87 --na---na----na--441.99 441.89 N-138 N-137A 458.8658 -na---na----na--442.9 442.8 N-139 N-138 443.1294 -na--na--na-442.9 442.8 N-140 N-139 443.89 --na----na----na--443.14 443.04 N-141 N-140 444.3999 --na----na----na--444.3999 444.84 N-142 N-141 445.7908 -na---na---na-445.7908 446.11 N-143 N-142 447.0108 --na---na--na-447.0107 447.71 N-144 N-143 451.3791 --na----na----na--448.2 448.1 N-145 N-144 448.46 -na---na--na-447.84 447.74 N-146 N-145 449.6399 --na--na--na--449.6399 449.84 N-147 N-146 452.3698 --na--na--na--452.3698 452.71 N-148 N-147 453.5397 -na--na--na-453.5397 453.89 N-149 N-148 464.129 -na----na----na--454.3 454.2 N-150 N-149 454.3029 --na---na----na--454.3029 454.65 N-151 N-150 456.4128 -na---na---na-455.87 455.77 N-152 N-151. 460.5699 --na---na---na-460.56 460.46 N-153 N-152 463.8899 --na----na----na--463.89 464.17 N-154 N-153 467.8199 -na---na----na-467.44 467.34 Table 8.3. Hydrograph Routing -East Basin -25-Year Storm ROUTEHYD a THRU [Existing East) USING TYPE1A AND [25 yr] NOTZERO ACTUAL Reach Area Flow Full Q %Full nDepth Size nVel Nel CBasin / Hyd ac cfs cfs ratio ft ft/s ft/s ------------ D-Dum2 19.7 5.7736 122.33 0.05 0.5347 X-Sect 4.2649 ----e-001 D-Dum1 53.6 16.6641 122.33 0.14 0.9204 X-Sect 5.9522 ---:-e-002 D-145 53.6 16.6623 121.12 0.14 0.9253 X-Sect 5.911 ---- D-144 53.6 16.6597 117.92 0.14 1.095 X-Sect 5.6189 --- D-143 53.6 16.6543 122.41 0.14 1.0158 X-Sect 5.17 48 ----- D-142 53.6 16.6481 82.3869 0.2 1.1029 X-Sect 4.6242 ---- D-141 53.6 16.6444 10.3949 1.6 -1 X-Sect 1.6012 --- P-117 65.2 18.3188 6.5804 2.78 -1 12" Diam 2.7838 8.3784 ex_east D-140 65.2 18.3118 124.5 0.15 0.7894 X-Sect 4.3271 --- D-139 65.2 18.2992 117.81 0.16 0. 786 X-Sect 4.6556- D-138 65.2 18.2868 94.8108 0.19 1.024 7 X-Sect 4.5015 ----- D-137 67.6 19.0686 279 0.07 0.6269 X-Sect 7.0354 -----e-003 P-116 67.6 19.0592 7.2535 2.63 -1 18" Diam 2.6276 4.1046 D-136 67.6 19.0493 61.7242 0.31 1.0913 X-Secl 4.8719 - D-135 67.6 19.0273 66.6905 0.29 1.2672 X-Sect 3.86 ---- D-134 67.6 19.0167 70.9939 0.27 0.926 X-Sect 4.7959 ---- D-133A 67.6 19.0082 93.7984 0.2 0.9908 X-Sect 4.8691 --- D-133 67.6 19.0069 26.6671 0.71 2.2289 X-Sect 1.5584 -- P-115 68.7 19.4194 6.9473 2.8 -1 12" Diam 2.7952 8.8456 e-004 D-132 68.7 19.4163 226.87 0.09 0.9372 X-Secl 7.5367- P-114 92.2 25.943 18.9199 1.37 -1 24" Diam 1.3712 6.0224 e-005 D-131 92.2 25.9323 338.51 0.08 0.9321 X-Sect 6.5545-- D-130 92.2 25.9219 33.2703 0.78 1.3721 X-Sect 5.6512 --- D-129 92.2 25.9106 8.6723 2.99 -1 X-Sect 2.9877 -- P-113 92.2 25.8992 23.5738 1.1 -1 18" Diam 1.0986 13.34 D-128 92.2 25.8888 266.41 0.1 1.076 X-Sect 5.818- D-127 92.2 25.8608 1354.11 0.02 0.8003 X-Secl 2.5676 ---- D-126 92.2 25.8358 491.48 0.05 0.4713 X-Sect 2.076 ---- D-125 92.2 25.7224 3470.27 0.01 0.5018 X-Sect 1.0908 ---- D-124 92.2 25.5489 549.84 0.05 0.478 X-Sect 0.836- D-123 92.2 25.5134 3827.85 0.01 0.584 X-Sect 2.4616 - P-112 92.2 25.4763 4.3371 5.87 -1 12" Diam 5.8741 5.5221 D-122 92.2 25.4617 50.2681 0.51 1.3879 X-Sect 3.5601 ----- D-121 122.6 32.0486 594.02 0.05 0.4735 X-Sect 14.376 ---e-006 P-111 122.6 32.0049 15.3148 2.09 -1 18" Diam 2.0898 8.6664 D-120 122.6 31.7866 18.2879 1.74 -1 X-Sect 1.7381 - D-119 122.6 31.6961 17.5281 1.81 -1 X-Sect 1.8083 -- D-118 122.6 31.6812 179.94 0.18 0. 7203 X-Secl 7.0837 -- D-117 122.6 31.6627 61.1492 0.52 1.5908 X-Sect 3.9591 --- D-116 122.6 31.6418 27.9865 1.13 -1 X-Sect 1.1306- D-115 122.6 31.64 78.2241 0.4 1.866 X-Sect 5.5186 - P-110 122.6 31.6228 30.6525 1.03 1.7027 24" Diam 11.096 9.757 D-114 122.6 31.5955 47.75 0.66 1.7176 X-Sect 5.6991 ---- D-113 124.4 31.8576 319.76 0.1 1 .1584 X-Sect 7.8462 ---e-007 D-112 124.4 31.8471 1134.16 0.03 0.8307 X-Sect 8.1092 --- D-111 124.4 31.8116 413.21 0.08 1 .2906 X-Sect 4.9987 --- D-110 124.4 31.7828 241.55 0.13 1.207 X-Sect 5.2894 ----- Reh App Bend Junct HW Max El/ Loss Head Loss Loss Elev Rim El Fr Node To Node fl fl fl fl fl fl N-110 408.797 N-111 N-110 409.747 --na----na----na--409.747 411.92 N-112 N-111 410.8606 --na----na----na-410.8606 414.13 N-113 N-112 412.5405 --na---na----na--412.5405 415.64 N-114 N-113 413.1504 --na----na---na--413.1505 ~15.67 N-115 N-114 414.8065 --na---na---na-414.18 414.08 . N-116 N-115 418.962 -na----na--na-416.6 416.5 N-117 N-116 416.6529 --na----na---na-416.49 416.39 N-118 N-117 417.3199 -na---na----na-416.49 416.39 N-119 N-118 416.9307 --na----na---na--416.71 416.61 N-120 N-119 418.4399 --na----na----na--418.24 418.14 N-121 N-120 420.9399 --na----na----na--420.43 420.33 N-122 N-121 421.5229 --na----na---na-421.5229 422.69 N-123 N-122 431.8698 --na--.--na--na--423.41 423.31 N-124 N-123 426.0499 --na---na--na-423.41 423.31 N-125 N-124 423.64 --na----na----na--423.64 424.05 N-126 N-125 491.2671 --na----na----na-424.9 424.8 N-127 N-126 425.6399 --na----na--na--425.6399 426.02 N-128 N-127 426.0798 -na---na--na-426.0798 426.52 N-129 N-128 427.6098 -na--na--na-427.6097 428.27 N-130 N-129 429.6497 -na--na--na-429.4 429.3 N-131 N-130 430.9699 -na--na--na-430.83 430.73 N-132 N-131 432.45 --na--na----na-432.45 432.79 N-133 N-132 437 .2202 --na--na----na--436.5 436.4 N-134 N-133 436.5119 --na----na----na--436.03 435.93 N-135 N-134 437 .85 --na---na----na--437.57 437.47 N-136 N-135 440.39 --na---na----na--440.25 440.15 N-137 N-136 444.033 --na----na----na--442.2 442.1 N-137A N-137 442.8699 --na----na----na--441.99 441.89 N-138 N-137A 469.665 --na----na----na--442.9 442.8 N-139 N-138 443.3789 -na----na---na--442.9 442.8 N-140 N-139 443.89 --na----na----na--443.14 443.04 N-141 N-140 444.3999 --na----na---na--444.3999 444.84 N-142 N-141 445.9371 --na----na---na--445.9371 446.11 N-143 N-142 447.157 -na--na--na-447.157 447.71 N-144 N-143 453.928 --na---na----na--448.2 448.1 N-145 N-144 448.46 --na---na----na-447.84 447.74 N-146 N-145 449.6399 --na----na----na--449.6399 449.84 N-147 N-146 452.3699 -na----na----na--452.3699 452.71 N-148 N-147 453.5398 -na---na----na-453.5398 453.89 N-149 N-148 470.8597 --na---na--na--454.3 454.2 N-150 N-149 454.3029 -na--na---na--454.3029 454.65 N-151 N-150 456.4129 -na---na--na-455.87 455.77 N-152 N-151 460.5699 --na----na----na--460.56 460.46 N-153 N-152 463.8981 -na----na---na--463.8981 464.17 N-154 N-153 467 .828 --na----na----na--467.44 467.34 Table B.4. Hydrograph Routing -East Basin -SO-Year Stonn ROUTEHYD D THRU [Existing East] USING TYPE1A AND [50 yr) NOTZERO ACTUAL Reach Area Flow Full Q % Full nDepth Size nVel Nel CBasin / Hyd ac cfs cfs ratio ft ft/s ft/s ------------ D-Dum2 19.7 6.4328 122.33 0.05 0.5644 X-Sect 4.4125 ---e-001 D-Dum1 53.6 18.4875 122.33 0.15 0.9737 X-Sect 6.1401 ·----e-002 D-145 53.6 18.4851 121.12 0.15 0.9789 X-Sect 6.0973 ----- D-144 53.6 18.482 117.92 0.16 1.1561 X-Sect 5.7757 --- D-143 53.6 18.4757 122.41 0.15 1.0682 X-Sect 5.3178 ---- D-142 53.6 18.4689 82.3869 0.22 1.16 X-Sect 4.7688 ----- D-141 53.6 18.4652 10.3949 1.78 -1 X-Sect 1.7764 -- P-117 65.2 20.3744 6.5804 3.1 -1 12" Diam 3.0962 8.3784 ex_east D-140 65.2 20.3667 124.5 0.16 0.8355 X-Sect 4.4786 --- D-139 65.2 20.3531 117.81 0.17 0.8317 X-Sect 4.8035 ----- D-138 65.2 20.3398 94.8108 0.21 1.0799 X-Sect 4.6329 --- D-137 67.6 21.2149 279 0.08 0.6572 X-Sect 7 .2468 -----e-003 P-116 67.6 21.2056 7.2535 2.92 -1 18" Diam 2.9235 4.1046 D-136 67.6 21.1949 61.7242 0.34 1.152 X-Sect 5.0314 -- D-135 67.6 21.1716 66.6905 0.32 1.3357 X-Sect 3.9737 --- D-134 67.6 21.1602 70.9939 0.3 0.9762 X-Sect 4.9411 ·---- D-133A 67.6 21.1511 93.7984 0.23 1.035 X-Sect 5.0466 --- D-133 67.6 21.1496 26.6671 0.79 2.3487 X-Sect 1.6064- P-115 68.7 21.6082 6.9473 3.11 -1 12".Diam 3.1103 8.8456 e-004 D-132 68.7 21.605 226.87 0.1 0.9869 X-Sect 7.7628 -- P-114 92.2 28.7909 18.9199 1.52 -1 24" Diam 1.5217 6.0224 e-005 D-131 92.2 28.7784 338.51 0.09 0.9857 X-Sect 6.7585 --- D-130 92.2 28.7663 33.2703 0.86 1.4508 X-Sect 5.8219- D-129 92.2 28.7555 8.6723 3.32 -1 X-Sect 3.3158 --- P-113 92.2 28.7428 23.5738 1.22 -1 18" Diam 1.2193 13.34 D-128 92.2 28.731 266.41 0.11 1 .1405 X-Sect 5.9997 ---- D-127 92.2 28.699 1354.11 0.02 0.8231 X-Sect 2.6309 --- D-126 92.2 28.6712 491.48 0.06 0.4918 X-Sect 2.1506 --- D-125 92.2 28.5445 3470.27 0.01 0.5218 X-Sect 1.1196 ----- D-124 92.2 28.3566 549.84 0.05 0.5043 X-Sect 0.8666 ----- D-123 92.2 28.3183 3827.85 0.01 0.6073 X-Sect 2.5267- P-112 92.2 28.2813 4.3371 6.52 -1 12" Diam 6.5208 5.5221 D-122 92.2 28.2656 50.2681 0.56 1.4497 X-Sect 3.6834 --- D-121 122.6 35.6853 594.02 0.06 0.5006 X-Sect 14.8923-e-006 P-111 122.6 35.6419 15.3148 2.33 -1 18" Diam 2.3273 8.6664 D-120 122.6 35.4329 18.2879 1.94 -1 X-Sect 1.9375 ----- D-119 122.6 35.3437 17.5281 2.02 -1 X-Sect 2.0164 - D-118 122.6 35.3278 179.94 0.2 0.7605 X-Sect 7.315 --- D-117 122.6 35.308 61.1492 0.58 1.6707 X-Sect 4.0938 --- D-116 122.6 35.2852 27.9865 1.26 -1 X-Sect 1.2608 ---- D-115 122.6 35.2833 ?8.2241 0.45 1.9632 X-Sect 5.68- P-110 122.6 35.2651 30.6525 1.15 -1 24" Diam 1.1505 9.757 D-114 122.6 35.2359 47.75 0.74 1.8022 X-Sect 5.8823 --- D-113 124.4 35.5397 319.76 0.11 1.2299 X-Sect 8.0881 --e-007 D-112 124.4 35.5284 1134.16 0.03 0.8726 X-Sect 8.4163 -- D-111 124.4 35.4908 413.21 0.09 1.3677 X-Sect 5.1548 ---- D-110 124.4 35.4602 241.55 0.15 1.2828 X-Sect 5.4622 ---- Reh App Bend June! HW Max El/ Loss Head Loss Loss Elev Rim El Fr Node To Node fl fl fl fl fl fl N-110 408.8728 N-111 N-110 409.8228 --na----na---na--409.8228 411.92 N-112 N-111 410.9377 --na----na----na-410.9377 414.13 N-113 N-112 412.6176 -na----na---na--412.6176 415.64 N-114 N-113 413.2275 --na----na----na--413.2275 415.67 N-115 N-114 414.9305 --na----na---na-414.18 414.08 N-116 N-115 415.8377 -na--na--na--415.8377 416.5 N-117 N-116 416.2331 --na----na---na-416.2331 416.39 N-118 N-117 417.0631 -na---na--na-416.49 416.39 N-119 N-118 417.0166 --na----na----na-416.71 416.61 N-120 N-119 418.4399 --na----na----na--418.24 418.14 N-121 N-120 420.9399 --na---na---na--420.43 420.33 N-122 N-121 421.6109 --na----na---na--421.6109 422.69 N-123 N-122 434.4431 --na----na---na--423.41 423.31 N-124 N-123 426.0499 -na---na---na-423.41 423.31 N-125 N-124 423.6399 --na----na----na--423.6399 424.05 N-126 N-125 506.9789 -na---na---na-424.9 424.8 N-127 N-126 425.6399 -na---na---na-425.6399 426.02 N-128 N-127 426.0798 -na---na---na-426.0798 426.52 N-129 N-128 427.6098 -na--na--na-427.6097 428.27 N-130 N-129 429.6497 --na----na--na-429.4 429.3 N-131 N-130 430.9699 -na--na--na-430.83 430.73 N-132 N-131 432.5004 -na--na---na-432.5004 432.79 N-133 N-132 438.2302 --na---na----na--436.5 436.4 N-134 N-133 436.5119 -na----na----na-436.03 435.93 N-135 N-134 437 .85 -na----na--na-437.57 437.47 N-136 N-135 440. 3899 --na----na---na--440.25 440.15 N-137 N-136 444.7122 -na---na----na-442.2 442.1 N-137A N-137 442.8699 --na----na----na-441.99 441.89 N-138 N-137A 476.2553 --na----na---na--442.9 .442.8 N-139 N-138 443.4986 -na---na--na-442.9 442.8 N-140 N-139 443.8899 --na----na---na--443.14 443.04 N-141 N-140 444.3999 --na----na---na--444.3999 444.84 N-142 N-141 446.0057 --na----na---na-446.0057 446.11 N-143 N-142 447.2256 --na----na--na--447.2256 447.71 N-144 N-143 455.4835 -na---na---na-448.2 448.1 N-145 N-144 448.46 --na---na---na--447.84 447.74 N-146 N-145 449.6399 -na---na--na-449.6399 449.84 N-147 N-146 452.3699 --na--na--na-452.3698 452.71 N-148 N-147 453.5398 -na----na---na--453.5398 453.89 N-149 N-148 474.9647 -na---na--na-454.3 454.2 N-150 N-149 454.3029 -na---na---na-454.3029 454.65 N-151 N-150 456.4129 --na----na----na-455.87 455.77 N-152 N-151 460.5836 -na--na--na-460.56 460.46 N-153 N-152 463.9726 --na----na----na-463.9726 464.17 N-154 N-153 467 .9025 --na----na---na-467.44 467.34 Table 8.5. Hydrograph Routing -East Basin -100-Year Stonn ROUTEHYD O THRU [Existing East) USING TYPE1A AND (100 yr) NOTZERO ACTUAL Reach Area Flow FullQ % Full nDepth Size nVel Nel CBasin I Hyd ac cfs cfs ratio ft ft/s ft/s ------------ D-Dum2 19.7 7.1007 122.33 0.06 0.5932 X-Sect 4.5504 ----e-001 D-Dum1 53.6 20.334 122.33 0.17 1.0256 X-Sect 6.3154 -----e-002 D-145 53.6 20.3311 121.12 0.17 1.0311 X-Sect 6.2711 --- D-144 53.6 20.3274 117.92 0.17 1.2148 X-Sect 5.9225 ---- D-143 53.6 20.3204 122.41 0.17 1.1183 X-Sect 5.4519 ----- D-142 53.6 20.3129 82.3869 0.25 1.2157 X-Sect 4.9037 ---- D-141 53.6 20.3094 10.3949 1.95 -1 X-Sect 1.9538 -- P-117 65.2 22.46 6.5804 3.41 -1 12" Diam 3.4132 8.3784 ex_east D-140 65.2 22.4518 124.5 0.18 0.8802 X-Sect 4.6208- D-139 65.2 22.4372 117 .81 0.19 0.8757 X-Sect 4.9419 ---- D-138 65.2 22.4229 94.8108 0.24 1.1329 X-Sect 4.756 ---- D-137 67.6 23.3927 279 0.08 0.6862 X-Sect 7 .4448 -----e-003 P-116 67.6 23.3835 7.2535 3.22 -1 18" Diam 3.2238 4.1046 D-136 67.6 23.3721 61.7242 0.38 1.2109 X-Sect 5.1805 ----- D-135 67.6 23.3475 66.6905 0.35 1.4016 X-Sect 4.08 --- D-134 67.6 23.3353 70.9939 0.33 1.0244 X-Sect 5.0771 ----- D-133A 67.6 23.3254 93.7984 0.25 1.0782 X-Sect 5.2133 ---- D-133 67.6 23.3239 26.6671 0.87 2.4653 X-Sect 1.6511 --- P-115 68.7 23.829 6.9473 3.43 -1 12" Diam 3.43 8.8456 e-004 D-132 68.7 23.8256 226.87 0.11 1. 034 7 X-Sect 7.9743 --- P-114 92.2 31.6894 18.9199 1.67 -1 24" Diam 1.6749 6.0224 e-005 D-131 92.2 31.6761 338.51 0.09 1.0378 X-Sect 6.9502- D-130 92.2 31.6628 33.2703 0.95 1.5281 X-Sect 5.9813 --- D-129 92.2 31.6529 8.6723 3.65 -1 X-Sect 3.6499 ----- P-113 92.2 31.6395 23.5738 1.34 -1 18" Diam 1.3421 13.34 D-128 92.2 31.627 266.41 0.12 1.2034 X-Sect 6.1704 -- D-127 92.2 31.5932 1354.11 0.02 0.8449 X-Sect 2.6909 ----- D-126 92.2 31.5642 491.48 0.06 0.5117 X-Sect 2.2214 ---- D-125 92.2 31.4314 3470.27 0.01 0.541 X-Sect 1.1469 ----- D-124 92.2 31.2367 549.84 0.06 0.5301 X-Sect 0.8959 ---- D-123 92.2 31.1967 3827.85 0.01 0.6298 X-Sect 2.5886 -- P-112 92.2 31.1607 4.3371 7.18 -1 12" Diam 7.1847 5.5221 D-122 92.2 31.1444 50.2681 0.62 1.5106 X-Sect 3.8005 ---- D-121 122.6 39.4139 594.02 0.07 0.527 X-Sect 15.3819 -----e-006 P-111 122.6 39.3717 15.3148 2.57 -1 18" Diam 2.5708 8.6664 D-120 122.6 39.1738 18.2879 2.14 -1 X-Sect 2.1421 ----- D-119 122.6 39.0873 17.5281 2.23 -1 X-Sect 2.23 -- D-118 122.6 39.0705 179.94 0.22 0. 7996 X-Sect 7 .5336 ----- D-117 122.6 39.0498 61.1492 0.64 1.7492 X-Sect 4.2208 -- D-116 122.6 38.9434 27.9865 1.39 -1 X-Sect 1.3915 ----- D-115 122.6 38.9414 78.2241 0.5 2.0557 X-Sect 5.829- P-110 122.6 38.9219 30.6525 1.27 -1 24" Diam 1.2698 9.757 D-114 122.6 38.8904 47.75 0.81 1.8838 X-Sect 6.0508 --- D-113 124.4 39.2371 319.76 0.12 1.298 X-Sect 8.3113 -----e-007 D-112 124.4 39.225 1134.16 0.03 0.9129 X-Sect 8.7019 ----- D-111 124.4 39.1846 413.21 0.09 1 .4411 X-Sect 5.2991 ----- D-110 124.4 39.1518 241.55 0.16 1.3552 X-Sect 5.6219 ---- Reh App Bend Junct HW Max El/ Loss Head Loss Loss Elev Rim El Fr Node To Node ft ft ft ft ft ft N-110 408.9452 N-111 N-110 409.8951 --na----na---na--409.8951 411.92 N-112 N-111 411.0111 --na----na----na-411.0111 414.13 N-113 N-112 412.691 --na----na----na--412.691 415.64 N-114 N-113 413.3009 --na----na----na--413.3009 415.67 N-115 N-114 415.03 --na----na----na-414.18 414.08 N-116 N-115 416.0292 --na---na----na--416.0292 416.5 N-117 N-116 416.3256 --na---na----na-416.3256 416.39 N-118 N-117 417 .1555 --na----na----na--416.49 416.39 N-119 N-118 417.1629 --na----na----na--416.71 416.61 N-120 N-119 418.4399 --na----na--na--418.24 418.14 N-121 N-120 420.9399 --na----na----na--420.43 420.33 N-122 N-121 421.696 --na----na----na--421.696 422.69 N-123 N-122 437 .3544 --na----na---na--423.41 423.31 N-124 N-123 426.0499 -na----na---na--423.41 423.31 N-125 N-124 423.6805 --na----na----na--423.6805 424.05 N-126 N-125 524.8533 --na---na---na-424.9 424.8 N-127 N-126 425.6399 --na---na---na-425.6399 426.02 N-128 N-127 426.0798 -na--na-· --na--426.0798 426.52 N-129 N-128 427.6098 --na--na---na-427.6097 428.27 ) N-130 N-129 429.6497 --na----na----na--429.4 429.3 N-131 N-130 430.9699 -na----na----na-430.83 430.73 N-132 N-131 432.5633 --na---na---na-432.5633 432.79 N-133 N-132 439.3671 --na----na----na-436.5 436.4 N-134 N-133 436.5119 --na----na----na--436.03 435.93 N-135 N-134 437.85 --na----na---na-437.57 437.47 N-136 N-135 440.3899 --na----na----na--440.25 440.15 N-137 N-136 445.4 762 -na---na----na--442.2 442.1 N-137A N-137 442.8699 --na----na----na--441.99 441.89 N-138 N-137A 483.6605 -na---na----na--442.9 442.8 N-139 N-138 443.6152 -na---na---na-442.9 442.8 N-140 N-139 443.8899 --na----na----na--443.14 443.04 N-141 N-140 444.4243 --na----na---na--444.4243 444.84 N-142 N-141 446.0716 --na----na---na-446.0716 446.11 N-143 N-142 447.2915 --na----na----na--447.2915 447.71 N-144 N-143 457.2313 --na--. -na----na--448.2 448.1 N-145 N-144 448.4599 --na----na----na-447.84 447.74 N-146 N-145 449.6399 --na----na----na--449.6399 449.84 N-147 N-146 452.3698 -na--na---na-452.3698 452.71 N-148 N-147 . 453.5398 --na----na----na-453.5398 453.89 N-149 N-148 479.5756 --na--na----na-454.3 454.2 N-150 N-149 454.3031 --na---na--na-454.3031 454.65 N-151 N-150 456.413 --na----na----na--455.87 455.77 N-152 N-151 460.6481 --na---na----na--460.56 460.46 N-153 N-152 464.0445 --na----na---na-464.0445 464.17 N-154 N-153 467.9954 --na----na----na--467.44 467.34 ·1 Table B.6. Hydrograph Routing -East Basin -Summary Table 2-Year 10-Year 25-Year 50-Year 100-Year Freeboard Freeboard Freeboard Freeboard Freeboarrl Reach ID From Node To Node (Fl) (Fl) (Fl) (Fl) (Fl) N-110 D-110 N-111 N-110 2.68 2.33 2.17 2.10 2.02 D-111 N-112 N-111 4.16 3.43 3.27 3.19 3.12 D-112 N-113 N-112 3.98 3.26 3.10 3.02 2.95 D-113 N-114 N-113 3.14 2.69 2.52 2.44 2.37 D-114 N-115 N-114 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop P-110 N-116 N-115 1.00 Overtop Overtop 0.66 0.47 D-115 N-117 N-116 0.83 Overtop Overtop 0.16 0.06 D-116 N-118 N-117 0.00 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-117 N-119 N-118 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-118 N-120 N-119 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-119 N-121 N-120 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-120 N-122 N-121 1.17 1.36 1.17 1.08 0.99 P-111 N-123 N-122 0.32 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-121 N-124 N-123 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-122 N-125 N-124 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.37 P-112 N-126 N-125 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-123 N-127 N-126 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 D-124 N-128 N-127 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 D-125 N-129 N-128 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 D-126 N-130 N-129 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop · Overtop D-127 N-131 N-130 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-128 N-132 N-131 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.29 0.23 P-113 N-133 N-132 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-129 N-134 N-133 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-130 N-135 N-134 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-131 N-136 N-135 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop P-114 N-137 N-136 0.68 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-132 N-137A N-137 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop P-115 N-138 N-137A Overtop Overtop Overtop · Overtop Overtop D-133 N-139 N-138 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-133A N-140 N-139 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-134 N-141 N-140 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.42 D-135 N-142 N-141 0.44 0.32 0.17 0.10 0.04 D-136 N-143 N-142 0.82 0.70 0.55 0.48 0.42 P-116 N-144 N-143 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-137 N-145 N-144 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-138 N-146 N-145 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 D-139 N-147 N-146 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 D-140 N-148 N-147 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 P-117 N-149 N-148 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-141 N-150 N-149 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 D-142 N-151 N-150 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-143 N-152 N-151 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-144 N-153 N-152 0.28 0.28 0.27 0.20 0.13 D-145 N-154 N-153 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop .·\ Table B.7. Hydrograph Routing -West Basin -2-Year Stonn ROUTEHYD O THRU [Existing West) USING TYPE1A AND [2 yr) NOTZERO ACTUAL Reach Area Flow Full a % Full nDepth Size nVel Nel CBasin / Hyd ac cfs els ratio fl fl/s fl/s ------------ D-021 2.9 0.5767 215.99 0 0.3321 X-Sect 3.0535 -----w-001 D-020 2.9 0.5766 75.0242 0.01 0.3244 X-Sect 2.7143 ----- P-016 19.2 2.8102 10.5228 0.27 0.3529 12" Diam 11.3425 13.398 w-002 D-019 19.2 2.8096 212.76 0.01 0.6667 X-Sect 4.1816 ----- D-018 21.1 3.0333 251.93 0.01 0.2382 X-Sect 5.8108 -----ex_west P-015 21.1 3.0325 7.7298 0.39 0.4351 12" Diam 9.2462. 9.8418 D-017 21.1 3.0318 138.18 0.02 0.3561 X-Sect 3.5277 --- D-016 21.1 3.0316 452.04. 0.01 0.254 X-Sect 5.0894 --- P-014 22.3 3.2439 7.9881 0.41 0.4436 12" Diam 9.6423 1 O. 1708 w-003 D-015 22.3 3.2432 160.64 0.02 0.451 X-Sect 3.7541 ----- D-014 22.3 3.2429 200 0.02 0.6317 X-Sect 4.3238 ---- P-013 22.3 3.2423 10.6228 0.31 0.3791 12" Diam 11.8787 13.5253 D-012 22.3 3.2413 290.67 0.01 0.6234 X-Sect 4.8101 -- D-011 22.3 3.2403 320.43 0.01 0.3609 X-Sect 4.0339 ----- D-010 25.5 3.7564 1040.88 0 0.5771 X-Sect 6.1421 -----w-004 P-012 25.5 3.7551 7.0631 0.53 0.5186 12" Diam 9.1309 8.9931 P-011 25.5 3.7536 6.9402 0.54 0.5239 12" Diam 9.0097 8.8365 P-010 25.5 3.7521 8.217 0.46 0.4742 12" Diam 10.2249 10.4623 P-009 25.5 3.7507 7.6431 0.49 0.4945 12" Diam 9.6859 9.7315 P-008A 27.7 4.1444 4.8684 0.85 0.709 12" Diam 6.9597 6.1986 w-005 P-008 31.5 4.8063 6.8722 0.7 0.6161 12" Diam 9.4657 8.75 w-006 P-007 31.5 4.8057 6.4104 0.75 0.6459 12" Diam 8.9569 8.162 P-006 31.5 4.8039 7.4569 0.64 0.5839 12" Diam 10.0875 9.4945 P-005 39.3 6.248 9.9629 0.63 0.574 12" Diam 13.3954 12. 6852 w-007 P-004 . 39.3 6.2406 7.7824 0.8 0.6778 12" Diam 11.0133 9.9088 D-009 39.3 6.2233 93.993 0.07 0.6278 X-Sect 2.79 --- D-008 39.3 6.2231 112.96 0.06 0.414 X-Sect 6.2056 --- P-003 39.3 6.2205 6.2952 0.99 0.8091 12" Diam 9.1373 8.0153 D-007 39.3 6.2079 107.57 0.06 0.5256 X-Sect 3.8357 ----- D-006 39.3 6.2077 964.56 0.01 0.3936 X-Sect 8.1166 ----- P-002 39.3 6.204 6.1462 1.01 0.8284 12" Diam 8.9179 7.8256 D-005 39.3 6.2035 ----0 0.915 X-Sect 2.1497 ---- D-004 39.3 6.1864 44.3354 0.14 0.5256 X-Sect 4.8288 ----- D-003 39.3 6.1853 313.41 0.02 0.5341 X-Sect 4.3358 ----- D-002 39.3 6.1799 770.99 0.01 0.6454 X-Sect 1.5651 ----- D-001 39.3 6.1797 146.32 0.04 0.4209 X-Sect 7.1705 ---- P-001 48.3 6.7994 8.2043 0.83 0.6946 12" Diam 11.6778 10.4461 w-008 Reh App Bend June! HW Max El/ Loss Head Loss Loss Elev Rim El From Nod To Node fl fl fl fl fl fl N-001 373.6321 N-002 N-001 382.2466 -na---na----na--380.5 380.4 N-003 N-002 381.0999 -na----na----na--380.43 380.33 N-004 N-003 382.8899 --na----na----na--382.3 382.2 N-005 N-004 389.8769 --na----na----na--389.8769 390.25 :·I N-006 N-005 398.3768 --na-- N-007 N-006 397. 7699 --na-- N-008 N-007 400.6486 --na-- N-010 N-008 400.3799 --na-- N-011 N-010 400.4899 --na-- N-012 N-011 403.3211 --na-- N-014 N-012 401.9299 --na-- N-015 N-014 402.4099 --na-- N-016 N-015 406.8691 0.9827 N-017 N-016 407.6445 0.5809 N-018 N-017 408.2272 0.5814 N-019 N-018 411 .1539 ------ N-019A N-019 419.722 0.4324 N-020 N-019A 420.102 ----- N-021 N-020 428.8048 0.3544 N-022 N-021 431.8735 1.2605 N-023 N-022 435.9002 0.355 N-024 N-023 437.2402 --na-- N-025 N-024 437.6302 --na-- N-026 N-025 440.4301 --na-- N-028 N-026 444.3401 -na-- N-029 N-028 445. 7641 --na-- N-031 N-029 445.934 -na- N-032 N-031 447.8239 --na-- N-033 N-032 448.994 --na- N-035 N-033 449.4039 -na- N-036 N-035 451.6238 --na-- N-037 N-036 452.5651 -na-- N-039 N-037 453.065 --na-- N-040 N-039 455.835 --na-- N-041 N-040 458.6864 -na-- N-043 N-041 458.8464 -na-- N-044 N-043 466.1862 --na-- --na---na-- --na----na-- --na----na-- --na----na-- --na----na-- --na---na-- --na----na-- --na----na-- 0. 0089 ------ 0.0075 ------ 0.0023 ---- 0.0032 ----- 0. 0039 ------ 0.0049 ------ 0.0013 ------ --na----na-- --na---na-- --na---na-- --na---na-- --na----na-- -na---na- -na---na-- --na----na- -na---na-- --na----na-- --na---na- --na----na-- --na----na-- --na---na-- --na----na- -na----na-- 398.3768 397.7699 399.4 399.4 400.32 401.7 401.9 402.4099 405.8952 406.41 407.6481 411.1539 419.2928 420.102 428.4543 430.6179 435.5465 437.2402 437.6302 440.4301 444.3401 445.764 445.934 447.8239 448.994 449.4039 451.6238 452.5651 453.065 455.835 458.6864 458.8463 466.1862 398.68 398.68 399.3 399.3 400.22 401.6 401.8 402.6 406.01 406.31 408.14 413.72 420.68 422.5 429.85 434 436.59 438.2 438.9 441.52 444.82 446.2 446.47 449.01 450.1 451.24 452.98 453.8 454.27 457.02 459.3 459.71 467.86 , ... Table B.8. Hydrograph Routing -West Basin -10-Year Storm ROUTEHYD D THRU [Existing West] USING TYPE1A AND [10 yr) NOTZERO ACTUAL Reach Area Flow Full Q %Full nDepth Size nVel Nel CBasin / Hyd ac cfs cfs ratio ft ft/s ft/s ------------ D-021 2.9 1.1262 215.99 0.01 0.4269 X-Sect 3.6099 ••••• w-001 D-020 2.9 1.126 75.0242 0.02 0.417 X-Sect 3.2085 ---- P-016 19.2 5.7252 10.5228 0.54 0.5258 12" Diam 13.6802 13.398 w-002 D-019 19.2 5.7243 212.76 0.03 0.8706 X-Sect 4.9958 ---- D-018 21.1 6.2369 251.93 0.02 0.3597 X-Sect 7.2932 --ex_west P-015 21.1 6.2355 7.7298 0.81 0.6807 12" Diam 10.9508 9.8418 D-017 21.1 6.2346 138.18 0.05 0.5336 X-Sect 4.3923 -- D-016 21.1 6.2343 452.04 0.01 0.3664 X-Sect 6.4244 --- P-014 22.3 6.6546 7.9881 0.83 0.6973 12" Diam 11.3797 10.1708 w-003 D-015 22.3 6.6534 160.64 0.04 0.6285 X-Sect 4.6707 --- D-014 22.3 6.653 200 0.03 0.827 X-Sect 5.1746 -- P-013 22.3 6.652 10.6228 0.63 0.5735 12" Diam 14.2771 13.5253 D-012 22.3 6.6504 290.67 0.02 0.8162 X-Sect 5.757 ••••• D-011 22.3 6.6488 320.43 0.02 0.516 X-Sect 5.0632 --- D-010 25.5 7.6794 1040.88 0.01 0. 7546 X-Sect 7.3444-w-004 P-012 25.5 7.6772 7.0631 1.09 -1 12" Diam 1.0869 8.9931 P-011 25.5 7.6747 6.9402 1.11 -1 12" Diam 1.1058 8.8365 P-010 25.5 7.6721 8.217 0.93 0.7657 12" Diam 11.8884 10.4623 P-009 25.5 7.6702 7.6431 1 0.8229 12" Diam 11.0927 9.7315 ) P-008A 27.7 8.4447 4.8684 1.73 -1 12" Diam 1.7346 6.1986 w-005 P-008 31.5 9.6483 6.8722 1.4 -1 12" Diam 1.404 8.75 w-006 P-007 31.5 9.6459 6.4104 1.5 -1 12" Diam 1.5047 8.162 P-006 31.5 9.6425 7.4569 1.29 -1 12" Diam 1.2931 9.4945 P-005 39.3 12.2397 9.9629 1.23 -1 12" Diam 1.2285 12.6852 w-007 P-004 39.3 12.2337 7.7824 1.57 -1 12" Diam 1.572 9.9088 D-009 39.3 12.2305 93.993 0.13 0.867 X-Sect 3.43 ----- D-008 39.3 12.2302 112.96 0.11 0.5807 X-Sect 7.6019 --- P-003 39.3 12.2269 6.2952 1.94 -1 12" Diam 1.9423 8.0153 D-007 39.3 12.2225 107.57 0.11 0.7439 X-Sect 4.7079 -- D-006 39.3 12.2223 964.56 0.01 0.5074 X-Sect 9.6143 ---- P-002 39.3 12.2172 6.1462 1.99 -1 12" Diam 1.9878 7.8256 D-005 39.3 12.2169 ---0 0.915 X-Sect 4.2335 --- D-004 39.3 12.207 44.3354 0.28 0.7349 X-Sect 5.8637 ---- D-003 39.3 12.1945 313.41 0.04 0.7226 X-Sect 5.3815 -- D-002 39.3 12.1624 770.99 0.02 0.7234 X-Sect 1.7335 ---- D-001 39.3 12.1621 146.32 0.08 0.5527 X-Sect 8.9201 --- P-001 48.3 13.7386 8.2043 1.67 -1 12" Diam 1.6746 10.4461 w-008 Reh App Bend Junct HW Max El/ Loss Head Loss Loss Elev Rim El From Nod To Node ft ft ft ft ft ft N-001 373.66 N-002 N-001 397.4953 -na---na----na--380.5 380.4 N-003 N-002 381.0999 -na----na----na--380.43 380.33 N-004 N-003 382.8899 --na--na--na--382.3 382.2 N-005 N-004 390.363 -na---na--na-390.35 390.25 N-006 N-005 398.8499 --na----na---na--398.78 398.68 N-007 N-006 398.1499 --na---na----na-398.1499 398.68 N-008 N-007 406. 7091 --na----na----na--399.4 399.3 N-010 N-008 400.3799 --na----na----na--399.4 399.3 N-011 N-010 400.4899 --na----na----na--400.32 400.22 N-012 N-011 402.893 --na----na---na--401.7 401.6 N-014 N-012 401.9299 --na----na----na--401.9 401.8 N-015 N-014 402.4099 --na----na----na--402.4099 402.6 N-016 N-015 414.9783 3.7712 0. 0341 ------406.11 406.01 N-017 N-016 412.823 2.3405 0.0303 ------406.41 406.31 N-018 N-017 412.9798 2.3422 0.0092 ------408.24 408.14 N-019 N-018 421.5153 ------413.82 413.72 N-019A N-019 428.7839 1.7952 0.0134 ------420.78 420.68 N-020 N-019A 424.1394 ------422.6 422.5 N-021 N-020 431.693 1.4817 0.0162 ------429.95 429.85 N-022 N-021 431.8735 1.4827 0.0057 ------430.3965 434 N-023 N-022 438.0848 1.4837 0.0053 ------436.69 436.59 N-024 N-023 440.4391 --na----na----na--438.3 438.2 N-025 N-024 438.69 --na----na----na--438.69 438.9 N-026 N-025 441.4899 --na---na----na--441.4899 441.52 N-028 N-026 445.3998 --na----na----na--444.92 444.82 N-029 N-028 447.9408 --na----na----na--446.3 446.2 N-031 N-029 446.47 --na----na----na-446.47 446.47 N-032 N-031 448.3599 --na---na---na--448.3599 449.01 N-033 N-032 451. 1722 --na---na---na--450.2 450.1 N-035 N-033 450.6099 --na----na----na--450.6099 451.24 N-036 N-035 452.8299 --na----na----na--452.8299 452.98 N-037 N-036 454.9681 --na----na----na--453.9 453.8 N-039 N-037 454.3999 --na----na----na--454.37 454.27 N-040 N-039 457.14 --na----na----na--457.12 457.02 N-041 N-040 460.2915 --na----na----na--459.4 459.3 N-043 N-041 459.5599 --na----na----na--459.5599 459.71 N-044 N-043 466.8998 --na----na----na--466.8998 467.86 ' ., Table B.9. Hydrograph Routing -West Basin -25-Year Storm ROUTEHYD O THRU [Existing West] USING TYPE1A AND (25 yr] NOTZERO ACTUAL Reach Area Flow Full Q % Full nDepth Size nVel Nel CBasin I Hyd ac cfs cfs ratio ft ft/s ft/s ------------ D-021 2.9 1.4193 215.99 0.01 0.4655 X-Sect 3.8249 --w-001 D-020 2.9 1.419 75.0242 0.02 0.4548 X-Sect 3.3995 --- P-016 19.2 7.2941 10.5228 0.69 0.6125 12" Diam 14.4658 13.398 w-002 D-019 19.2 7.2903 212.76 0.03 0.9533 X-Sect 5.3071 ----- D-018 21.1 7.9622 251.93 0.03 0.4124 X-Sect 7.8517 ----ex_west P-015 21.1 7.9606 7.7298 1.03 0.8494 12" Diam 11.1952 9.8418 D-017 21.1 7.9596 138.18 0.06 0.6103 X-Sect 4.7161 --- D-016 21.1 7.9593 452.04 0.02 0.4154 X-Sect 6.9302 --- P-014 22.3 8.4903 7.9881 1.06 0.8943 12" Diam 11.4571 10.1708 w-003 D-015 22.3 8.4889 160.64 0.05 0. 7052 X-Sect 5.0142 -- D-014 22.3 8.4884 200 0.04 0.9062 X-Sect 5 .4996 ----- P-013 22.3 8.4872 10.6228 0.8 0.676 12" Diam 15.0227 13.5253 D-012 22.3 8.4854 290.67 0.03 0.8943 X-Sect 6.1186 ----- D-011 22.3 8.4835 320.43 0.03 0.5836 X-Sect 5.4511 ----- D-010 25.5 9.7892 1040.88 0.01 0.8265 X-Sect 7.8039 -----w-004 P-012 25.5 9.7867 7.0631 1.39 -1 12·: Diam 1.3856 8.9931 P-011 25.5 9.7842 6.9402 1.41 -1 12" Diam 1.4098 8.8365 P-010 25.5 9.7811 8.217 1.19 -1 12" Diam 1.1903 10.4623 P-009 25.5 9.7791 7.6431 1.28 -1 12" Diam 1.2795 9.7315 P-008A 27.7 10.7564 4.8684 2.21 -1 12" Diam 2.2095 6.1986 w-005 P-008 31.5 12.2532 6.8722 1.78 -1 12" Diam 1.783 8.75 w-006 P-007 31.5 12.2295 6.4104 1.91 -1 12" Diam 1.9077 8.162 P-006 31.5 12.214 7.4569 1.64 -1 12" Diam 1.6379 9.4945 P-005 39.3 15.4537 9.9629 1.55 -1 12" Diam 1.5511 12.6852 w-007 P-004 39.3 15.439 7.7824 1.98 -1 12" Diam 1.9838 9.9088 D-009 39.3 15.4332 93.993. 0.16 0.9703 X-Sect 3.6728- D-008 39.3 15.4329 112.96 0.14 0.6524 X-Sect 8.1307 -- P-003 39.3 15.4277 6.2952 2.45 -1 12" Diam 2.4507 8.0153 D-007 39.3 15.4211 107.57 0.14 0.8378 X-Sect 5.0372 ---- D-006 39.3 15.4209 964.56 0.02 0.5537 X-Sect 10.1896 -- P-002 39.3 15.4136 6.1462 2.51 -1 12" Diam 2.5078 7.8256 D-005 39.3 15.4133 ----0 0.915 X-Sect 5.3412 ---- D-004 39.3 15.3973 44.3354 0.35 0.8232 X-Sect 6.2522 ---- D-003 39.3 15.3784 313.41 0.05 0.8043 X-Sect 5.7771 --- D-002 39.3 15.3305 770.99 0.02 0. 7 49 X-Sect 1.8482 -- D-001 39.3 15.3302 146.32 0.1 0.61 X-Sect 9.5841 ----- P-001 48.3 17.4789 8.2043 2.13 ·· -1 12" Diam 2.1304 10.4461 w-008 Reh App Bend Junct HW Max EV Loss Head Loss Loss Elev Rim El From Nod To Node ft ft ft ft ft ft N-001 373.66 N-002 N-001 412.2399 -na----na----na--380.5 380.4 N-003 N-002 381.1 -na----na---na--380.43 380.33 N-004 N-003 382.8899 --na----na---na--382.3 382.2 N-005 N-004 390.6017 -na----na----na--390.35 390.25 N-006 N-005 398.85 --na----na----na--398.78 398.68 N-007 N-006 398.1499 --na----na----na--398.1499 398.68 N-008 N-007 411. 7735 --na----na----na--399.4 399.3 N-010 N-008 400.3799 --na----na----na--399.4 399.3 N-011 N-010 400.4899 --na----na----na--400.32 400.22 N-012 N-011 404.2625 --na----na----na--401.7 401.6 N-014 N-012 401. 9299 --na----na----na--401.9 401.8 N-015 N-014 402.4099 --na----na----na--402.4099 402.6 N-016 N-015 422.4271 6.0118 0.0544 ------406.11 406.01 N-017 N-016 416.8114 3.7554 0.0486 -----406.41 406.31 N-018 N-017 416.9514 3.7649 0.0148 -----408.24 408.14 N-019 N-018 429.5789 ------413.82 413.72 N-019A N-019 437.9548 2.9125 0.0218 ------420.78 420.68 N-020 N-019A 426.2303 ------422.6 422.5 N-021 N-020 436.8487 2.4083 0.0264 -----429.95 429.85 N-022 N-021 438.8036 2.4098 0.0093 ------434.1 434 N-023 N-022 442.3643 2.4111 0.0087 ------436.69 436.59 N-024 N-023 442.7826 --na----na----na--438.3 438.2 N-025 N-024 438.69 --na----na----na--438.69 438.9 N-026 N-025 441.4899 --na----na----na--441.4899 441.52 N-028 N-026 445.3998 --na----na----na-444.92 444.82 N-029 N-028 449. 7335 --na----na----na--446.3 446.2 N-031 N-029 446.47 --na---na----na-446.47 446.47 N-032 N-031 448.3599 --na----na----na--448.3599 449.01 N-033 N-032 452.986 --na----na----na--450.2 450.1 N-035 N-033 450.6099 --na---na---na-450.6099 451.24 N-036 N-035 452.8299 -na----na----na-452.8299 452.98 N-037 N-036 456.3148 --na----na----na--453.9 453.8 N-039 N-037 454.3999 --na----na----na--454.37 454.27 N-040 N-039 457.1399 --na----na---na--457.12 457.02 N-041 N-040 461 .6094 --na----na----na--459.4 459.3 N-043 N-041 459.5599 --na----na----na-459.5599 459.71 N-044 N-043 466.8998 --na---na----na--466.8998 467.86 :{ Table 8.10. Hydrograph Routing -West Basin -50-Year Storm ROUTEHYD O THRU [Existing West) USING TYPE1A AND [50 yr) NOTZERO ACTUAL Reach Area Flow FullQ % Full nDepth Size nVel Nel CBasin / Hyd ac cfs els ratio fl fl/s fl/s ---------- D-021 2.9 1.5685 215.99 0.01 0.4833 X-Sect 3.9215 ----w-001 D-020 2.9 1.5683 75.0242 0.02 0.4722 X-Sect 3.4853 --- P-016 19.2 8.0999 10.5228 0.77 0.6581 12" Diam 14.7787 13.398 w-002 D-019 19.2 8.0896 212.76 0.04 0.9912 X-Sect 5.4469- D-018 21.1 8.8435 251.93 0.04 0.4372 X-Sect 8.1008 -----ex_west P-015 21.1 8.8417 7.7298 1.14 -1 12" Diam 1.1439 9.8418 D-017 21.1 8.8407 138.18 0.06 0.6463 X-Sect 4.8603 --- D-016 21.1 8.8404 452.04 0.02 0.4384 X-Sect 7.156-- P-014 22.3 9.434 7.9881 1.18 -1 12" Diam 1.181 10.1708 w-003 D-015 22.3 9.4262 160.64 0.06 0.7412 X-Sect 5.1673 ----- D-014 22.3 9.4257 200 0.05 0.9425 X-Sect 5.6454 ----- P-013 22.3 9.4245 10.6228 0.89 0.7329 12" Diam 15.2781 13.5253 D-012 22.3 9.4224 290.67 0.03 0.9301 X-Sect 6.2809 --- D-011 22.3 9.4204 320.43 0.03 0.6154 X-Sect 5.6241 ----- D-010 25.5 10.8663 1040.88 0.01 0.8595 X-Sect 8.0101 --w-004 P-012 25.5 10.8659 7.0631 1.54 -1 12" Diam 1.5384 8.9931 P-011 25.5 10.8622 6.9402 1.57 -1 12" Diam 1.5651 8.8365 P-010 25.5 10.8581 8.217 1.32 -1 12• Diam 1.3214 10.4623 P-009 25.5 10.8544 7.6431 1.42 -1 12" Diam 1.4201 9.7315 P-008A 27.7 11.9326 4.8684 2.45 -1 12" Diam 2.4511 6.1986 w-005 P-008 31.5 13.5621 6.8722 1.97 -1 12" Diam 1.9735 8.75 w-006 P-007 31.5 13.5297 6.4104 2.11 -1 12" Diam 2.1106 8.162 P-006 31.5 13.5123 7.4569 1.81 -1 12" Diam 1.8121 9.4945 P-005 39.3 17.0801 9.9629 1.71 -1 12" Diam 1.7144 12.6852 w-007 P-004 39.3 17.0634 7.7824 2.19 -1 12" Diam 2.1926 9.9088 D-009 39.3 17.0568 93.993 0.18 1.0185 X-Sect 3.7809 --- D-008 39.3 17.0564 112.96 0.15 0.6858 X-Sect 8.366 -- P-003 39.3 17.0509 6.2952 2.71 -1 12" Diam 2.7086 8.0153 D-007 39.3 17.0435 107.57 0.16 0.8816 X-Sect 5.1838 ----- D-006 39.3 17.0432 964.56 0.02 0.5748 X-Sect 10.4477 --- P-002 39.3 17.0355 6.1462 2.77 -1 12" Diam 2.7717 7.8256 D-005 39.3 17.0353 ---0 0.915 X-Sect 5.9032 --- D-004 39.3 17.0172 44.3354 0.38 0.8642 X-Sect 6.4254 ----- D-003 39.3 16.9961 313.41 0.05 0.8428 X-Sect 5.9539- D-002 39.3 16.9427 770.99 0.02 0.7591 X-Sect 1. 9232 ----- D-001 39.3 16.9424 146.32 0.12 0.6369 X-Sect 9.8817 -- P-001 48.3 19.3916 8.2043 2.36 -1 12" Diam 2.3636 10 .4461 w-008 Reh App Bend June! HW Max El/ Loss Head Loss Loss Elev Rim El From Nod To Node fl fl fl fl fl ft N-001 373.66 N-002 N-001 421.1453 -na---na---na--380.5 380.4 N-003 N-002 381.1 -na--na----na--380.43 380.33 N-004 N-003 382.8899 -na----na---na-382.3 382.2 N-005 N-004 390.6621 --na---na----na--390.35 390.25 N-006 N-005 398.8499 --na-- N-007 N-006 398.1499 --na-- N-008 N-007 414.7916 --na-- N-010 N-008 400.3799 --na-- N-011 N-010 400.5191 --na-- N-012 N-011 405.0781 --na-- N-014 N-012 401.9299 --na-- N-015 N-014 402.4099 --na-- N-016 N-015 426.8611 7.3437 N-017 N-016 419.1824 4.5962 N-018 N-017 419.3115 4.6079 N-019 N-018 434.3575 ------ N-019A N-019 443.3864 3.5843 N-020 N-019A 427 .4875 ------ N-021 N-020 440.1545 2.9679 N-022 N-021 440.8607 2.9701 N-023 N-022 444.2857 2.9721 N-024 N-023 444.2004 --na-- N-025 N-024 438.6899 --na-- N-026 N-025 441.4899 --na-- N-028 N-026 445.3998 --na-- N-029 N-028 450.8166 --na-- N-031 N-029 446.47 --na-- N-032 N-031 448.3599 -na-- N-033 N-032 453.324 --na-- N-035 N-033 450.6099 --na-- N-036 N-035 452.8299 -na-- N-037 N-036 457.129 --na-- N-039 N-037 454.3999 --na-- N-040 N-039 457 .1399 --na-- N-041 N-040 462.4097 --na-- N-043 N-041 459.5599 --na-- N-044 N-043 466.8998 --na-- --na----na-- --na----na-- --na----na-- --na----na-- --na----na-- --na----na-- --na----na-- --na----na-- 0.0665 ------ 0.0595 ------ 0.0181 ------ 0.0268 ------ 0. 0325 ------ 0.0115 ------ 0.0107 ------ --na----na-- --na----na-- --na----na-- --na----na-- --na----na-- --na----na- --na---na-- --na----na-- -na---na-- --na---na-- --na--na-- --na----na-- --na----na-- --na----na-- --na----na-- --na----na-- 398.78 398.1499 399.4 399.4 400.32 401.7 401.9 402.4099 406.11 406.41 408.24 413.82 420.78 422.6 429.95 434.1 436.69 438.3 438.6899 441.4899 444.92 446.3 446.47 448.3599 450.2 450.6099 452.8299 453.9 454.37 457.12 459.4 459.5599 466.8998 398.68 398.68 399.3 399.3 400.22 401.6 401.8 402.6 406.01 406.31 408.14 413.72 420.68 422.5 429.85 434 436.59 438.2 438.9 441.52 444.82 446.2 446.47 449.01 450.1 451.24 452.98 453.8 454.27 457.02 459.3 459.71 467.86 " ., Table B.11. Hydrograph Routing -West Basin -100-Year Stonn ROUTEHYD a THRU [Existing West] USING TYPE1A AND (100 yr) NOTZERO ACTUAL Reach Area Flow FullQ % Full nDepth Size nVel Nel CBasin I Hyd ac cfs cfs ratio fl fl/s fl/s --··--··---- D-021 2.9 1.7191 215.99 0.01 0.5002 X-Sect 4.0124 -----w-001 D-020 2.9 1.7188 75.0242 0.02 0.4887 X-Sect 3.5662 ----- P-016 19.2 8.9147 10.5228 0.85 0.7064 12" Diam 15.0315 13.398 w-002 D-019 19.2 8.8982 212.76 0.04 1 . 0272 X-Sect 5.5783 ----- D-018 21.1 9.7341 251.93 0.04 0.4611 X-Sect 8.3334 -----ex_west P-015 21.1 9.7323 7.7298 1.26 -1 12" Diam 1.2591 9.8418 D-017 21.1 9.7313 138.18 0.07 0.6809 X-Sect 4.9949 ---- D-016 21.1 9.7309 452.04 0.02 0.4605 X-Sect 7.3672 ---- P-014 22.3 10.3918 7.9881 1.3 -1 12" Diam 1.3009 10.1708 w-003 D-015 22.3 10.3745 160.64 0.06 0.7757 X-Sect 5.3102 ---- D-014 22.3 10.3736 200 0.05 0.977 X-Sect 5.7823 ----- P-013 22.3 10.3718 10.6228 0.98 0.7991 12" Diam 15.4151 13.5253 D-012 22.3 10.3694 290.67 0.04 0.9642 X-Sect 6.4331 ----- D-011 22.3 10.3672 320.43 0.03 0.6459 X-Sect 5.7856 ----- D-010 25.5 11.9547 1040.88 0.01 0.8908 X-Sect 8.2036 ---w-004 P-012 25.5 11.9546 7.0631 1.69 -1 12" Diam 1.6925 8.9931 P-011 25.5 11.9518 6.9402 1.72 -1 12" Diam 1.7221 8.8365 P-010 25.5 11.9391 8.217 1.45 -1 12" Diam 1.453 10.4623 P-009 25.5 11.8994 7.6431 1.56 -1 12" Diam 1.5569 9.7315 P-008A 27.7 13.0768 4.8684 2.69 -1 12" Diam 2.6861 6.1986 w-005 ) P-008 31.5 14.8216 6.8722 2.16 -1 12" Diam 2.1567 8.75 w-006 P-007 31.5 14.7641 6.4104 2.3 -1 12" Diam 2.3031 8.162 P-006 31.5 14.7397 7.4569 1.98 -1 12" Diam 1.9766 9.4945 P-005 39.3 18.6376 9.9629 1.87 -1 12" Diam 1.8707 12.6852 w-007 P-004 39.3 18.6131 7.7824 2.39 -1 12" Diam 2.3917 9.9088 D-009 39.3 18.6037 93.993 0.2 1.0612 X-Sect 3.8828 --- D-008 39.3 18.6034 112.96 0.16 0.7161 X-Sect 8.5744 ---- P-003 39.3 18.5959 6.2952 2.95 -1 12" Diam 2.954 8.0153 D-007 39.3 18.5866 107.57 0.17 0.9214 X-Sect 5.3133 ---- D-006 39.3 18.5863 964.56 0.02 0.5938 X-Sect 10.6766 ----- P-002 39.3 18.5762 6.1462 3.02 -1 12" Diam 3.0224 7.8256 D-005 39.3 18.576 ----0 0. 915 X-Sect 6.4371 ----- D-004 39.3 18.5514 44.3354 0.42 0.9012 X-Sect 6.5778 --- D-003 39.3 18.5234 313.41 0.06 0.8774 X-Sect 6.1089 ---- D-002 39.3 18.4536 770.99 0.02 0.7682 X-Sect 1.9897 ---- D-001 39.3 18.4532 146.32 0.13 0.6611 X-Sect 10.141 ----- P-001 48.3 21.1994 8.2043 2.58 -1 12" Diam 2.5839 10.4461 w-008 Reh App Bend June! HW Max El/ Loss Head Loss Loss Elev Rim El From Nod To Node fl fl fl fl fl fl N-001 373.66 N-002 N-001 430.4121 --na----na----na--380.5 380.4 N-003 N-002 381 . 0999 -na---na----na--380.43 380.33 N-004 N-003 382.8899 --na--na----na--382.3 382.2 N-005 N-004 390.6975 --na---na---na--390.35 390.25 :·1 N-006 N-005 398.8499 -na----na----na--398.78 398.68 N-007 N-006 398.1499 -na----na----na--398.1499 398.68 N-008 N-007 417.9379 --na----na----na--399.4 399.3 N-010 N-008 400.3799 --na----na----na--399.4 399.3 N-011 N-010 400.5711 --na----na----na--400.32 400.22 N-012 N-011 405.9302 --na----na----na--401.7 401.6 N-014 N-012 401.9299 --na----na----na--401.9 401.8 N-015 N-014 402.4099 --na----na----na--402.4099 402.6 N-016 N-015 431.5039 8.7441 0.0791 ------406.11 406.01 N-017 N-016 421.6752 5.469 0.0707 ------406.41 406.31 N-018 N-017 421.7617 5.4872 0.0216 ------408.24 408.14 N-019 N-018 439.3409 -----413.82 413.72 N-019A N-019 449.133 4.3046 0. 0322 ------420.78 420.68 N-020 N-019A 428.8355 ------422.6 422.5 N-021 N-020 443.6975 3.5882 0. 0393 -----429.95 429.85 N-022 N-021 443.1411 3.5959 0.0139 ------434.1 434 N-023 N-022 446.4317 3.5976 0.0129 ------436.69 436.59 N-024 N-023 445. 7808 --na----na----na--438.3 438.2 N-025 N-024 438.6899 --na----na----na--438.6899 438.9 N-026 N-025 441.4899 -na----na----na--441.4899 441.52 N-028 N-026 445.3998 --na----na----na--444.92 444.82 N-029 N-028 452.0266 --na----na----na--446.3 446.2 N-031 N-029 446.47 -na----na----na--446.47 446.47 N-032 N-031 448.3599 -na---na----na--448.3599 449.01 N-033 N-032 454.3832 -na----na----na--450.2 450.1 N-035 N-033 450.6099 -na--na----na-450.6099 451.24 N-036 N-035 452.8299 --na---na----na-452.8299 452.98 N-037 N-036 458.0387 -na----na----na--453.9 453.8 N-039 N-037 454.3999 --na----na----na--454.37 454.27 N-040 N-039 457.1399 --na----na----na--457.12 457.02 N-041 N-040 463.3042 --na----na----na-459.4 459.3 N-043 N-041 459.5599 --na----na----na--459.5599 459.71 N-044 N-043 466.8998 --na----na----na--466.8998 467.86 ' I Table 8.12. Hydrograph Routing -West Basin -Summary Table 2-Year 10-Year 25-Year 50-Year 100-Year Freeboard Freeboard Freeboard Freeboard Freeboard Reach ID From Node To Node ft ft ft ft ft N-001 P-001 N-002 N-001 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-001 N-003 N-002 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-002 N-004 N-003 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-003 N-005 N-004 0.37 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-004 N-006 N-005 0.30 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-005 N-007 N-006 0.91 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 P-002 N-008 N-007 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-006 N-010 N-008 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-007 N-011 N-010 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop P-003 N-012 N-011 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-008 N-014 N-012 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-009 N-015 N-014 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 P-004 N-016 N-015 0.11 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop P-005 N-017 N-016 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop P-006 N-018 N-017 0.49 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop P-007 N-019 N-018 2.57 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop P-008 N-019A N-019 1.39 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop P-008A N-020 N-019A 2.40 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop P-009 N-021 N-020 1.40 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop P-010 N-022 N-021 3.38 3.60 Overtop Overtop Overtop P-011 N-023 N-022 1.04 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop P-012 N-024 N-023 0.96 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-010 N-025 N-024 1.27 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 D-011 N-026 N-025 1.09 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 D-012 N-028 N-026 0.48 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop P-013 N-029 N-028 0.44 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop r D-014 N-031 N-029 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ,_ D-015 N-032 N-031 1.19 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 P-014 N-033 N-032 1.11 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-016 N-035 N-033 1.84 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 D-017 N-036 N-035 1.36 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 P-015 N-037 N-036 1.23 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-018 N-039 N-037 1.20 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-019 N-040 N-039 1.19 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop P-016 N-041 N-040 0.61 Overtop Overtop Overtop Overtop D-020 N-043 N-041 0.86 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 D-021 N-044 N-043 1.67 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Preliminary Technical Ilnformation Report .~©;" 1'1 ~IQ' ,:J l_l:V 1 JUL 6 -2()0\ K.G. o.o.E.S. EJ<hlblt No. --'l"'"l.__ __ _ Item No. Le11tio11e +l.CiIYitP/ Aeeeived 3 · <.. ··111 King County Hearing Examiner Submitted to: King County DDES 900 Oakesdale Avenue S.W. Renton, WA 98055 Prepared by: Haozous Engineering, P.S. 14816 SE I 16th Street Renton, WA 98059 Tel. ( 425) 235-2707 Fax ( 425) 254-0579 June 15, 2001 ) • • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS .. :· I. Project Overview ............................................................................................................... 1-1 2. Conditions and Requirements Summary ........................................................................... 2-1 3. Off site Analysis ................................................................................................................. 3-1 4. Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design ....................................... .4-1 5. Conveyance System Analysis and Design ......................................................................... 5-1 6. Special Reports and Studies .............................................................................................. 6-1 7. Other Permits .................................................................................................................... 7-1 8. ESC Analysis and Design ................................................................................................. 8-1 9. Bond Quantities, Facility Summaries, and Declaration of Covenant.. .............................. 9-1 10. Operations and Maintenance Manual.. .......................................................................... I 0-1 11. References ..................................................................................................................... 11-1 LIST OF TABLES Table I. Description of Downstream Conveyance System ................................................... 3-5 Table 2. Existing and Developed Site Basin Conditions ..................................................... .4-2 Table 3. Summary of Performance Standards ....................................................................... 4-3 Table 4. Wet Pond Sizing Calculations ............................................................................... 4-11 Table 5. Summary of Special Reports and Studies ............................................................... 6-1 Table 6. Summary of Other Permits Required ...................................................................... 7-1 Table 7. Summary of Maintenance Requirements for Stormwater Facilities ..................... l 0-1 • \ • LIST OF FIGURES Figure I . TIR Worksheet ....................................................................................................... 1-2 Figure 2. V1cm1ty Map .......................................................................................................... 1-5 Figure 3. Drainage Basins ..................................................................................................... 1-6 Figure 4. Soils Map ............................................................................................................... 1-7 Figure 5. Downstream Conveyance System .......................................................................... 3-4 Figure 6. Stormwater System Design .................................................................................... 4-6 Figure 7 A. Flow Duration Curves for RID -East Basin ....................................................... 4-7 Figure 78. Flow Duration Curves for RID -West Basin ...................................................... 4-9 Figure 8. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan ............................................................... 8-2 Figure 9. Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet.. ...................................................... 9-2 Figure 10. Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Summary ............................................ 9-3 APPENDICES Appendix A. Downstream System Appendix B. Stormwater RID System Design Appendix C. Conveyance Calculations Appendix D. Hydrologic Model Documentation u • • ~ • 1. Project Overview , Project Description A summary of the Evendell Plat project is provided in the TIR Worksheet (Figure I). This preliminary technical information report (TIR) addresses the design of stormwater facilities and the offsite drainage analysis for the Evendell Plat project. The Evendell Plat project is a proposed residential development located within the Renton Highlands area of unincorporated King County (Figure 2). The proposal for development includes building 75 single-family dwellings on approximately 12 acres. Road improvements along SE 136th Street are also proposed. The proposed site plan is provided in Figure 6 of Section 4. Site Description The site is located within the Orting Hills subbasin of the Cedar River watershed (King County Department of Natural Resources, 1999). The site consists of two basins. The topography of the east basin generally slopes from the northwest to the southeast (Figure 3). The topography of the west basin generally slopes from the east to the west. The elevation of the site ranges from about 494 feet (NAVO 88) in the north portion of the site to 456 feet in the southeast comer. The project is located east of I 56th Avenue SE and is bordered by SE 136th Street on the north and by 1601h Avenue SE on the east. Cover types on the site include a single-family residence, pasture, and forest (Photo I in Appendix A. I). A Class 2 wetland has been identified in the northeast portion of the site. Based on King County Soil Survey (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1973) the site consists of Alderwood soils (Figure 4). Drainage from an approximately 0.94-acre tributary subbasin adjacent to the west boundary of the easterly basin sheet flows onto the site (Figure 3 ). The easterly basin drains to a conveyance system along 160th Avenue SE. The westerly basin drains to a conveyance system along 156th A venue SE. Both downstream drainage courses eventually discharge to an unclassified tributary of the Cedar River (King County Department of Parks, Planning, and Resources, 1990). Stormwater Design Under developed conditions, stormwater from the site and offsite road improvements will be collected and treated onsite to basic water quality standards. A combined wetpond/detention pond will be used to manage runoff in the easterly basin. A small wetvault will provide water quality treatment to a portion of SE 136th Street that bypasses the stormwater facility in the east basin. A vault followed by a biofiltration swale will be used to manage runoff in the westerly basin. Level 2 RID standards are required by the King County Flow Application Maps and recommended by Lower Cedar River Basin and Nonpoint Action Plan. Natural discharge locations from the site will be maintained at the outlet of the proposed storm water facilities. 1-1 Evende/1 Plat Preliminary 11R-June 2001 8 Figure 1. TIR Worksheet TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER Project Owner: U.S. Land Development Associates, Inc. Address: C/o: Mike Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 8th Dr. SE Bothell, WA 98021. Phone: (425) 486-2563 Project Engineer: Ed McCarthy, P.E. Company: Haozous Engineering, P.S. Address/Phone: 14816 SE 116th Street Renton, WA 98059 /425) 235-2707 Part 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION ~ Residential ~ Grading Part 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Project Name: Evendell Plat Location: West of 160th Avenue SE and bordered by SE 136th Street on the north. Township: 23N Range: 5E Section: 14 Description: The proposal for development includes building 75 single-family dwellings on approximately 12 acres. Part 4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS 0 DFWHPA ~ Wetlands ~ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Permit ~ Forest Practices Class IV General Part 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community: King County Drainaoe Basin: Lower Cedar River Watershed; Ortina Hills subbasin Part 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS 0 River: N/A D Stream: N/A D Critical Stream Reach: NIA D Depressions/Swales: NIA 0 Lake: NIA 0 Steep Slopes: NIA D Floodplain: N/A ~ Wetlands: Onsite Class 2 Wetland D Seeps/Springs: N/A D High Groundwater Table: NIA D Groundwater Recharge: N/A 1-2 ) • • • Part 7 SOILS Soil Type Alderwood Slopes Moderate Part8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS REFERENCE Ch 6 -Water Quality Requirements Ch 5 -Flow Control Part 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION ~ Sedimentation Facilities ~ Stabilized Construction Entrance ~ Perimeter Runoff Control ~ Cover Practices ~ Construction Sequence Part 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM . Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT Onsite treatment -basic standards Level 2 R/D standards MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION ~ Stabilize Exposed Surface ~ Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities ~ Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris ~ Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities Basin Water Qualitv Treatment Detention East Wetoond/Wetvault Level 2 Pond West Biofiltration swale Level 2 Vault Facility Related Site Design Considerations: Reference Facility Design Consideration 1-3 ) t) ) • • • Part 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS IE! Rockery > 4' High D Berms> 6': NIA Part 12 EASEMENTS/TRACTS D Drainage Easement: NIA D Access Easement: NIA D Native Growth Protection Easement IE! Sensitive areas ~ Stormwater tracts Part 13 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. Si ned/Date 1-4 • ) • • : ::, 0 0 • . · ..... SOURCE: USGS 7.5 x 15 Minute Series -Renton, Washington SCALE: 1 :25 000 TITLE PAGE \ '~ .. : ~ ·,~· : ,a • • ' .......... Figure 2. Vicinity Map DATE 1-o 01/03/01 I I I I u """ ™ Fm l'"i ... fj.p,WfiA,., .fWV . 0 200 '°° DATE NO. REV1SION LIi - od n , ·\ ·r:1 / t [ [ .i \_, l ' ,•.a' .,,.:,.)if«.,[. I.I { BY -• ~ EVENDE~PL o.st' ~J (9.3 AC) '-\J 3 A i -. e <I\ - [ -A. ( Jr "\. • ,.,J't. \.,"" l ~ ....... 0="'€=-~~[ ( D PROJECT NO. Haozous Engineering CIVIL ENGINEERING 14816 SE 116TH ST, RENTON, ',/A 98059 EVENDELL PLAT 425-235-2707 DESIGNED 8Yl EJM I DAlE: 1/08/01 -~¥ ·...;;-.. ---..-,. ~~---· Figure 3. Drainage Basins EJM 1/08/01 SHEET 1-6 OF • • • SCALE: 1 :24 000 1" = 2,000' TlTl.E PAGE Figure 4. Soils Map DATE 1-7 01/03/01 • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • ~ 0 • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • < 2. Conditions and Requirements Summary A summary of conditions and requirements for the project are presented in this section. The following is a summary of core and special requirements from the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual: Core Requirement 1: Discharge at the Natural Location The natural discharge locations from the site will be maintained at the outlets of the proposed stormwater facilities. Core Requirement 2: Off-site Analysis A Level 1 downstream drainage analysis is presented in Section 3. Core Requirement 3: Runoff Control Level 2 RID standards are required for the site. Core Requirement 4: Conveyance System The onsite stormwater conveyance system and offsite improvements will be designed to convey the 25-year storm. Core Requirement 5: Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan froposed erosion/sedimentation control procedures are described in Section 8. An erosion/sedimentation control plan (ESCP) will be developed for the project during engineering design. Core Requirement 6: Maintenance and Operation The proposed systems for managing stormwater will be maintained and operated by King County. Recommended maintenance activities are provided in Section l 0. Core Requirement 7: Bonds and Liability Bonds and liability requirements will be developed for the project during engineering design (Section 9). 2-1 EvendelJ Plat Preliminary TIR-.hme 2001 • Core Requirement 8: Water Quality As described in Section 5.E, basic water quality standards apply to the site. A basic wetpond will provide water quality treatment for stormwater collected from the site's east basin. A biofiltration swale will provide water quality treatment for stormwater collected from the site's west basin. Alternatively, a wetvault may be used to treat stormwater collected from the site's west basin. A small wetvault will provide water quality treatment for stormwater collected a portion of road improvements along SE 1361 h Street. Special Requirement 1: Other Adopted Area-Specific Requirements The site is within the Cedar River Basin. Basin-wide requirements have been recommended by the Lower Cedar River Basin and Nonpoint Action Plan that apply to the site. These requirements are covered by the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual Applications Maps. Special Requirement 2: Delineation of 100-Year Floodplain The site is not within a 100-year floodplain. Special Requirement 3: Flood Protection Facilities The project does not contain nor is it adjacent to a flood protection facility. Special Requirement 4: Source Controls Source controls are not proposed for the development. Special Requirement 5: Oil Control The proposed development does not meet the definition of a high-use site requiring oil control. 2-2 EvenddlP/at Pre/bninary 17R-.lwte 2001 3, Offsite Analysis The site and project area are in two separate basins. The majority of the site is in the easterly basin. Topography in this basin slopes primarily from the northwest to the southeast towards 1601h A venue SE. A smaller portion of the site flows the west. This includes the northwest and southwest comers of the site, as well as a portion of proposed road improvements along SE 136th Street. These portions of the site flow to the west towards I 561h A venue SE. A downstream drainage analysis for the site, including drainage routes along both 160th Avenue SE and 156th Avenue SE, is presented in this section. The drainage courses from the site were assessed on 01/05/01. Moderate rainfall occurred during the morning prior to the site visit. The downstream conveyance system is described below and illustrated in Figure 5. Further descriptions of downstream structures are summarized in Table I. Upstream Drainage Drainage from an approximately 0.94-acre tributary subbasin adjacent to the site's western boundary sheet flows onto the site's easterly basin (Figure 3). Runoff from areas north of the site is collected in the roadside ditch along 158th Avenue SE (Location 2 in Figure 5). Runoff collected in the ditch on the west side of 158 1h Avenue SE is conveyed to the east through a 12- inch diameter culvert (Location I) under the cul-de-sac of 158th Avenue SE. The culvert at Location 1 also conveys drainage from a section of ditch along the north side of SE 136th Street (Location 30). The 12-inch diameter culvert discharges to an earth-lined ditch on the site's north boundary (Location 3, Photo 3 in Appendix A. I). Segments of the ditch show signs of minor erosion. The northerly ditch also collects runoff from the roadside ditch on the east side of 1581h A venue SE and from properties to the north. The vegetation and dimensions of the northerly ditch change as it proceeds from west to east (Locations 4 and 5). At the northeast comer of the site, a ditch on the west side of 160th A venue SE joins the system. The system subsequently jogs around a utility box (Location 6). The ditch continues along the east boundary of the site (Location 7). No scouring or erosion was observed in the grass-lined ditch along this segment. The road embankment on the west side of 160th A venue SE is steep, but stable. A side channel from the onsite wetland merges with the roadside ditch at Location 8. (Photo 4 in Appendix A. l ). A small amount of flow was observed exiting the wetland at the time of the site visit. The ditch continues along the east boundary of the site to the site's southeast comer. Downstream Drainage Course -1601h Avenue SE Upon leaving the site's southeast comer, the grass-lined ditch continues in a southerly direction through 12-inch diameter driveway culverts (Locations IO through 13, Photo 5 in Appendix A. I). At a distance of about 660 feet from the site, a 12-inch diameter concrete pipe conveys drainage to the east side of 160th Avenue SE (Location 14 ). The site comprises approximately 17 percent of the tributary basin area at this point in the drainage system. Drainage is then conveyed through a 24-inch diameter CMP driveway culvert with a crimped end (Location 15). From Location 15, drainage is conveyed through a short section of ditch with accumulated sediment 3-1 Evendd11'1111 Preliminary 11R-June 2001 (Location 16). At a distance of about 860 feet from the site, drainage flows through an 18-inch diameter pipe at the residence of 14028 -160th Avenue SE (Location 17). A past drainage problem (Drainage Complaint No. 97-0423) was reported at this location. The complaint was not available but was related to overflow from the roadside ditch (Appendix A.2). The 18-inch diameter pipe discharges to an earth-lined section of ditch (Location 18). Minor erosion was observed at the outlet of the 18-inch diameter pipe. At a distance of about 1,000 feet from the site, drainage flows away 1601h Avenue SE to the east, among trees on a forested parcel (Location 19). The channel is somewhat flat and braided after leaving the roadside ditch and passes through a ponded area (Location 20). The channel then becomes more well-defined (Location 21) and enters a 12-inch diameter pipe (Location 22) located near a horse corral. Drainage is then conveyed through a 12-inch diameter driveway culvert (Location 23) and then to an open channel. The open channel flows along the north boundary ofresidential lots that are along SE 142nd Place. Asegment of the channel has been reinforced with concrete blocks (Location 24). Drainage then enters an 18-inch diameter pipe that has a trash rack and concrete headwall inlet (Location 25). At Location 26, the channel turns to the south and has significant bank erosion at the bend. The site comprises approximately 9 percent of the tributary basin area at this point in the drainage system. The channel then flows down the hill (Location 27) towards SE 144th Street. A past drainage problem (Drainage Complaint No. 97-0206) was reported at Location 25 (Appendix A.2). The resident at 16046-SE 142"d Place has had problems from runoff in the channel along his property. The 18-inch diameter pipe has likely been installed since the complaint was filed to reduce groundwater seepage from the ditch that was apparently compromising the performance of the homeowner's onsite sewage treatment system. The homeowner also stated in the complaint that he maintains the ditch long the north and east boundaries of his property by removing accumulations of debris and sediment. King County investigated the problem for the Neighborhood Drainage Assistance Program. Downstream Drainage Course -1561 h Avenue SE A break in grade approximately 250 feet west of the intersection of SE 1361 h Street and1581 h A venue SE divides surface water flow to the east and west. From the grade break, drainage flows west along a shallow grass-lined ditch along the north side of SE 136th Street (Location 31 ). Road improvements end about 375 feet west of 1581 h Avenue SE, at which point the roadside ditch discharges to a grassy area in the road right-of-way (Location 31 ). There is no distinct flow path in the road right-of-way and drainage likely reaches the ditch along 1561 h Avenue SE by sheet or shallow flow. At the intersection of SE 1361 h Street (Location 33, Photo 6 in Appendix A. I), the earth-lined ditch along 156th Avenue SE flows to the south. At a distance of about 150 feet south of SE 136th Street, drainage enters a series of Type I catch basins connected by segments of ditch and 12-inch diameter pipe (Locations 34 through 52). No signs of capacity problems were observed along the drainage route at these locations. At Locations 35 and 3 7, leaves and other debris have accumulated, presenting the potential for plugging downstream sections of pipe. 3-2 Evmddl l'lllt Pn!limmary 77R-June 2001 At Locations 42 and 43, drainage from SE 1381h Place enters the conveyance system. Runoff from the southeast comer of the site sheet flows towards the backyards of homes at the end of SE 138th Place. Runoff from this area of the site eventually drains to the conveyance system along SE 138th Place. A past drainage problem (Drainage Complaint No. 97-0107) was reported by the resident at 15641 SE 1381h Place (Appendix A.2). Based on King County's record, the complaint was related to a change in drainage pattern due to a broken culvert at the cul-de-sac (Appendix A.2). At Locations 46 and 47, drainage from SE 139th Place enters the conveyance system. Downstream from Location 52, a grass-lined ditch conveys drainage to the south along a pasture (Location 53). At the lower end of the pasture (Location 54) the ditch flattens and it appears that high flow rates could flow onto a portion of the pasture. At Location 55, drainage enters a 12- inch diameter pipe. A past drainage problem (Drainage Complaint No. 97-0318) was reported at Location 55 by the resident at 14038 561h Avenue SE (Appendix A.2). The complaint is a claim and was not available from King County. Based on King County's record, the complaint was related to flooding due to a plugged culvert (Appendix A.2). Downstream Drainage Complaints Drainage complaints along the downstream system were investigated at King County Water and Land Resource Division. Drainage Complaint Nos. 97-0423, 97-0206, 95-0107, and 97-0318 are along the drainage route and are described in the narrative above. A map showing the locations of residents that filed drainage complaints is provided in Appendix A.2. Copies of registered drainage complaints are listed in Appendix A.2. A summary of the drainage complaints is provided in Table A.I of Appendix A.2. 3-3 Evendel/ Plat Preliminary 11R -June 200 I / LEGEND Culvert Ditch I I~ • 1- I~ ' Catch Basin -· 10 (2) -;. ! i e ,,.~ ® " 'fi Ac. ~211.01· @/ ~ SheetFlow ~ Location ID ® 1'111.E PAGE ll-4 SCALE: 1" = 300' 8111/01 Table 1. Description of Downstream Conveyance System Basin: Easterly basin draining to 160th Ave SE (including upstream areas) Site Visit on 01/05/01 Weather: Raint :!!;'!:~~~ r~i&;;~~11i~J~~~~r~;:1ffir~l i:~~l! '~ii ',&;;,-F''s'· r sheettl ·swa1 · ·. · ·druinag bas'·· " .. ,, ,,,. 'l/4inil -r32ott · •· · · ·· stricti · 'uridei'C!IPIICi!Y po,iding 7•• • tributary likelihooctoff ~jjfitf! ;aff,~Jl i~~~~~ 1°'(~,r{i J>:?t~lrt1i}1 }ti~~scZ~~~=~it~ 2··,.~prob~-0vcill~'j;,%, 56 Sheet flow Pasture area drains 2 West boundary of 58 2 3 4 5 Sheet flow 12-inch diameter CP Length =90' Roadside ditch Width: 1.5' Depth: 2' Side slope: 2:1 North boundary ditch Width: 1.5' Depth: 1.5' Side slope: I: I North boundary ditch Width: 1.5' Depth: 3.0' Side sl()Jl_e: 2:1 North boundary ditch Width: 2.0' Depth: 3.0' Side slope: 2: I towards site site Forested area I I I South portion of HW=l' Earth-lined ditch; east side of 158th Avenue SE Earth-lined ditch Grass-lined ditch w/ briars Earth-lined ditch 2 4 3 2 2 site Northwest comer of site North of site I North boundary of site I North boundary of site North boundary of site I Minor erosion I Somewhat undulating topography; runoff from south boundary of site flows south Conveys drainage from west ditch of 158th Avenue SE I Collects runoff from roadside ditches along 158th Avenue SE and areas to north of site Collects runoff from areas to north of site Collects runoff from areas to north of site • Table 1 (continued) Basin: Easterly basin draining to 160'" Ave SE ":Eociition. Drainage _ Drainage Slope . Distance from Existing Potential . Observations ofFieldt' IP??· . component Site Discharge _" -· ._ ..... ~ -'.·-·,.~~--r Component Type, Problems Problems Inspecto_r;· ,~efa~,1 Name, and Size ~escription -:}.· -:~.__,,~ ·Reviriver·-or'.f.{'$ 'if.;."$.t:"; -. ,< .• -ResfatJr~I~ ~;:~{.i-~~. .. ·- !SccFi ·S Type: sheet flow, swale, drainage basin, 1/4 mile=l,320 ft constrictions, under capacity, ponding, tributmy area, Iikclihooo_of, "·<:" rr·, _g: l~!Jt;~_·{· ·stteam, channel, pipe. vegetation, cover, depth, . (%) (Fl) overtopping, scouring, bank sloughing, · problem,:overl!o\v ?.ti, Size: diameter, width tvnP of sensitive area sedimentation, incision, other erosion nathwa= nntential ~>;, 6 North boundary ditch Dense briars 3 Northeast comer Collects runoff from Width: 2.0' of site areas to north; ditch jogs Depth: 3.0' around utility box; ditch Side slope: 2: I from west side of 160th Avenue SE ioins in 7 Roadside ditch Grass-lined ditch; 4 East boundary of No scouring or Width: 1.5' west side of 158th site erosion; road Depth: 2' Avenue SE embankment is Side slooe: 1.5:1 steeo but stable 8 Side chanoel from Wetland 0.5 East boundary of None Small amount of flow onsite wetland site observed Width: 2' Depth: 1.5' Side slooe: 2: I 9 Roadside ditch Grass-lined ditch 3 East boundary of Width: 1.5' site Depth: 2' Side slooe: 3:1 IO 12-inch diameter CP HW=l' 2 40 None II Roadside ditch Grass-lined ditch 3 60-400 Width: 2' Depth: 1.5' Side slooe: 3:1 12 12-inch diameter CMP HW=l.5' 2 400 Table 1 ( continued) Basin: Easterly basin draining to 160" Ave SE liil·~i~~j ~)-}~i~t, !IJJr,~: ·· ,::r .,_ iil~~;~l:'!£Ft1~!~;:tl. ~~~~~-l1~<~\f;l-r 1!~~~ll1:~~l:i:{;~~~1:i°l~~~:1~~ia~~Ji;· 13 I Roadside ditch I Grass-lined ditch I 3 I 420-660 Width: 2' Depth: 1.5' Side slope: 2: 1 14 I 12-inch diameter CP HW=L5' 15 16 17 18 19 Length= 40' 24-inch diameter CMP I HW= I' Length= 20' Roadside ditch I Grass-lined ditch Width: 2' Depth: 1.5' Side slope: 2: I 18-inch diameter CMP I HW= 1' Length= 80' Roadside ditch I Earth-lined ditch Width: 3' Depth: 3' Side slope: 2: 1 Braided channel Forested 3 660 2 780 3 820-860 3 860 2 950-1,000 1,000-1,100 Downstream end of culvert is crimped Some sediment at culverts Past drainage problem reported at this location; See Drainage Complaint No. 97-0423 Minor erosion at outlet of! 8-inch diameter CMP Culvert crosses from west to east side of road Water flows east among trees Table 1 ( continued) Basin: Easterly basin draining to 160'" Ave SE ~¥~i~, ... ·.· :~rllin9:ge' :,.: \,},.~2D,2~g~~~.:,[f:~, '.~~-0~~: {~~ta~i:e!~?~J .. '.4; _Ens.t!~g:~~-{ ;,~1;• . ~~ten~ial __ :~:.'. : Ob~ry-a~~?-i~!~fI~!~f ,'J,,,.,,JD,• .. r,-.c •. .Componeirt.Type,< ·, ·-:.,Component, , •>> 6 ,,, ·.C?,, .•. Stte-D,s_charge.,. '"·Pro.blems "'.,. c, .• Problems ···"· Ins~tor,.Resource., ~~;;}s:.~; ... _Nanie;,anifs~e > t::§~!&~~~~~il~' ;:~:If! }:f:f''·'i~Y!~:~ i~?f7:.·~1:~:J ~]~'.~ .. :_, .. · ... _· ·: {;; ~i},~l~~efl~~ll ilili~i ~~i:._. iy:~~:;r~~~~~i: 2• 1~~%~i~if~I E~,=1~~~:$:i~~ ~~~;wi~~~ 20 Ponded area Forested, potential 0.5 1,100-1,200 Flow path through 21 22 23 24 25 26 Channel Width: 2.5' Depth: I' Side slope: 2: I 12-inch diameter CMP 12-inch diameter culvert Channel Width: 2.5' Depth: 2.5' Side slope: Vertical 24-inch diameter culvert Channel Width: 3' Depth: 4' Side slope: I: I wetland area middle of ponded area Earth-lined J 2 J 1,200-1,350 Earth-lined bottom; concrete block walls Earth-lined 1-2 1-2 2 3 I 1,350 I 1,450 I 1,470-1,600 1,600 1,660-1,700 I Water likely backs up mder his!! flows I Potential overtopping of I drivewa:i: Past drainage problem reported at this location; See Drainage Complaint No. 97-0206 Highly eroded banks I I Erosion likely to continue I Culvert passes mder horse corral I Culvert passes mder driveway Culvert has trash rack and concrete headwall inlet Table 1 ( continued) Basin: Easterly basin draining to 160 1• Ave SE Slope •. I)istance_froin . Existing . .. Potential .· . • Observ:ationso,f~!~I!fj ';;c SiteDiscltarge• ·· Probleins. Problems • ·lnspecto1{Rlisourci:1 ' . ·. ' -;()0~ -_c_:'; .i:J,1~~f~i!i1tlt 11,li~l~ 211~J ~~)''ig>S 'l'•Type: sheetllow.-swale; '" I' • ;:<lrainage.basin, · . · _ _ . . .. ,,\W3.',cc/i<;s 'stream, chaiuiel;pipe · · . vegetation, covet'·depth, I '(%) · ~}1'?f,};r: · ske: diameier;width . · · .•• , • iypi,orsensltiv~area-· ·. ···· · '' :,_ 114 mile=l;320 ft'· 1··•. . constrictions, under capacity, ponding,:·, ·1-·.tributaryarea,likiilihotJd'.of; . . ':?:11}:···-••. • o:::!:i:=.;;,;~~o=:;·jr. ~:'~~~~ I, 700-2,000 I Eroded banks I Erosion likely to I Channel heads down hill 27 I Channel I Earth-lined Width: 3' 6 continue towards SE 144th Street Depth: 4' Side slope: 1:1 Table 1 ( continued) Basin: Westerly basin draining to 156,. Ave SE bLocation. --: -Drainage --<'<Drainage:',: , ,Slope, _ Distan-cefromc. --Existing,,-,,-, . Observiitions:of-F'ieldt i~if:;·_,:;:cN:;:~~~~-;->~~J~~~~~~fJ~It:: it}.it~~ ·"SJ!1-~~;:11;t! i';;;:~;~1!~s_:: .. ~st~L~~~,~ ,~;~t1-il'.~~;:.j;~~=~-clii~h1,~4?Y;i§t;~~ftf~.[f;1:&?l::~S:~~~p~~iii&- 57 I Sheet flow I Forested area I 2 I Southwest corner I I I Runoff from southwest 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Roadside ditch Width: 1.5' Depth: 1.5' Side slOPe: 3: I Ditch Width: OS Depth: OS Side sl()J)e: 3: I Sheet and/or shallow channel Roadside ditch Width: 2' Depth: 3S Side slope: 2: I 12-inch diameter CP 12-inch diameter CP 12-inch diameter CP Grass-lined ditch Shallow grass-lined ditch Grass area; no distinct flow path Earth-lined ditch HW=l' HW=JS HW=l.5' 2 2 3 5 4 4 4 of site corner of site sheet flows towards SE 138th Place Road improvement along SE 136th Street Road improvement along SE 136th Street Road improvement along SE 136th Street 0-150 150 220 310 None Upstream end of culvert partially blocked with leaves Flows to east towards Location I Flows to grass area to west in road ROW Access to vacant lot Table 1 ( continued) Basin: Westerly basin draining to 1561• Ave SE !!~~~~'; ~s~;"~~!~1~;ir~~:~r•~t~~.:~it S1i &e&eF· ··s\ •.Type: sheet f!ow·swal • . • d!Binage basin;; . · ·: . • • -:, l/4.mile=l· 320-ft ·•, '.coilstricti 1lllder · i .ponding '.;, .'tributary.... ··:Jilc:elihiilxrorn• tft1?n'i0 ·=~~ ... v~~~~'. =:}%~.'> ;:,·•0:i~i:u.;li~11 l~t~1~~:~~~~~ f~~-- 37 I Roadside ditch Earth-lined ditch 5 340-470 4-6 inches of Debris has Width: 2' leaves in bottom potential to block Depth: 2.5' of ditch downstream Side slope: 2: I culverts 38 I 12-inch diameter CP HW-1' 4 470 Upstream end of culvert partially blocked with leaves 39 40 41 42 43 44 12-inch diameter CP I HW-1.5' crossing SE 13 7th Place Type I CB 12-inch diameter CMP in 12-inch diameter N12 out Type I CB -grate inlet 12-inch diameter N12 Type I CB 12-inch diameter N12 Type I CB 12-inch diameter N12 Type I CB 12-inch diameter N12 4 550 4 600 4 660 4 870 3 950 3 1,100 Table 1 ( continued) Basin: Westerly basin draining to 156th Ave SE *~i#:X :\; ;I>~lli11.age,i) t Z'.;\ i)>,r,lli~~~t, .. ;,&loP,e, {D.is~aJ}t~Jr,~.~llA :· . , .Emti11g ... . · · .. P~tential · · Obs~i;,t~~°'ps;§f;Ji~!! I\\;;:g>,r,,:; ' Co1Dponent,Type, ,/C;om11o·ne11t· . S1teD1sch11rge Problems · Problems lnspector;il:l~yli.~'.{ !itlttI}~ •· : N1U11~?'1!d Size> , /)lriri:iP,t~t,;1f ·. · · : >~ ;r(/ ···· -it,:wJt~tiJlli ;,l~Fi 5.·,:.r . : sheetflow;·swale . · .>,.''drainllgebesin, · · l/4mile=l;320·ft::. constrictions, under i , ding, >tributary: .. -:likelihoocfof!: ff~Itig~0f''~J:J£'· v~~~:~~· .. •(%)·' ·.(Ff)'' ... 0=:=E~:;.,y~~to~~T. 45 I 12-inch diameter CP I I 2 I 1,240 I I I Collects runoff from SE from east 139th Place 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 T)1le I CB -grate inlet 12-inch diameter N12 in 12-inch diameter CP out Type 1 CB -grate inlet 12-inch diameter CP from east T)1le 1 CB -grate inlet 12-inch diameter N12 out 12-inch diameter N12 outlet 12-inch diameter CP 12-inch diameter CP Roadside ditch Width: LS' Depth: 2' Side sl()J)e: 2: 1 Roadside ditch HW= 1' HW=l' Grass-lined ditch Grass-lined ditch; ditch flattens out 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 1,240 I 1,290 1,290 I 1,320 I 1,460 1,470 1,520 1,550-1,750 1,750-2,000 I I I Half-filled with sediment I Collects runoff from SE 139th Place Water likely spreads out onto adj11,cent pasture Table 1 ( continued) Basin: Westerly basin draining to 1561h Ave SE Et~lfl~i ~111~n·-·;ti: :::::.. ·1.;a -~~¥iJt~~t.;t ;~e!~ mi(~;:} ·~·''~:if~i~~fr~; ·v;a.:i~:S'..;r~ .j~~sMf, 55 12-inch diameter CP HW = I' 2 2,000 Past drainage problem reported at this location; See Drainage Complaint No. 97-0318 • • '4/iliFiow Contnifaiid Water ·Quality Facility Analysis and Design . ·. · Part A: Existing Hydrology The site consists of two basins. The topography of the east basin generally slopes from the northwest to the southeast (Figure 3). The topography of the west basin generally slopes from the east to the west. Cover types on the site include a single-family residence (Photo 1 in Appendix A. I), forest (Photo 2 in Appendix A. I), and pasture. A Class 2 wetland has been identified in the northeast portion of the site. Cover types and areas used in the storm water design for existing onsite conditions are summarized in Table 2. Part B: Developed Site Hydrology The proposal for development includes building 75 single-family dwellings on about 12 acres. The proposed site plan is provided in Figure 6. Cover type areas for developed onsite conditions are summarized in Table 2. Under developed conditions, the developed portion of the site, including offsite road improvements, will consist of 4.53 acres of grass and 7.23 acres of impervious area. Under developed conditions, stormwater from the site and road improvements will be collected and treated onsite to basic water quality standards. Stormwater will be managed separately in the east and west basins. In the east basin, stormwater from the site and a portion of improvements along SE 1361h Street will be collected and managed in an onsite combined wetpond/detention pond. The outfall of the pond will discharge to the drainage ditch along the west side of 160th Avenue SE. Stormwater from a 0.33-acre portion of SE 136th Street will bypass the onsite stormwater facility, but will be treated to basic water quality standards with a small wetvault located near the intersection of SE 136th Street and 160th Avenue SE. The stormwater pond in the southeast corner of the site will be designed using a downstream point-of-compliance to account for the bypass from SE 136 1h Street. In the west basin, stormwater from the site and a portion of improvements along SE 136th Street will be collected and managed in an onsite detention vault and subsequently treated by a biofiltration swale. Stormwater from a 0.19-acre portion of SE 136th Street will bypass the onsite storm water facility. The storm water vault in the southwest corner of the site will be designed using a downstream point-of-compliance to account for the bypass from SE 136th Street. Runoff from the existing impervious area of 0.16 acre on SE 1361h Street will be treated onsite in lieu of the bypass. 4-1 Evouldl Pfat Preliminary 11R-Jw,e 2001 • Table 2. Existing and Developed Site Basin Conditions Existing Conditions Subbasins KCRTS Till-forest Till-pasture Wetland Till-grass Imperv Basin (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) East Basin exeast Site 7.54 1.74 --- SE 136th Street Improvements -0.47 --0.09 Subtotal 7.54 2.21 --0.09 West Basin exwest Site 0.44 1.12 --- SE 136th Street Improvements -0.29 0.07 Subtotal 0.44 1.41 --0.07 Grand Total 7.98 3.62 --0.16 Developed Conditions Subbasins KCRTS Till-forest Till-pasture Wetland Till-grass Imperv Basin (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) East Basin deveast Lots 3.79 4.82 RID 0.16 0.66 SE 136th Street Improvements -0.56 Subtotal ---3.95 6.04 West Basin devwest Lots 0.58 0.73 RID 0.10 SE 136th Street Improvements -0.36 Subtotal ---0.58 1.19 Grand Total ---4.53 7.23 Note: 0.19 acre of impervious of SE 136 Street improvements bypass the RID facility in the west basin. 0.33 acre of impervious of SE 136 Street improvements bypass the RID facility in the east basin. 4-2 Total (AC) 9.28 0.56 9.84 1.56 0.36 1.92 11.76 Total (AC) 8.61 0.82 0.56 9.99 1.31 0.10 0.36 1.77 11.76 Part C: Performance Standards A summary of flow control, conveyance, and water quality treatment performance standards for the project is presented in Table 3, below. Table 3. Summary of Performance Standards Catee:orv Performance Standard Source Flow Control • Level 2 RID . C 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual; Applications Map Conveyance System C Provide conveyance for C Surface Water Design Capacity developed 25-year storm Manual Section 1.2.4.1 Water Quality C Basic water quality treatment C Surface Water Design Treatment Menu using a wetpond in the east Manual Section 1.2.8.1; basin and a biofiltration swale Applications Map or wetvault in the west basin Source Control C None proposed Oil Control C The site does not meet the C Surface Water Design definition of a high-use site Manual Section 1.3.5 4-3 Evenddl Plat Preliminary 11R-June 2/JOJ Part D: Flow Control System KCRTS was used to design the proposed stormwater facilities. Procedures and design criteria specified in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual were followed for hydrologic modeling. Descriptions of the storm water systems and details of the design analysis are provided below. A plan view of the stormwater systems is provided in Figure 6. For stormwater facility designs, the reduced KCRTS time series data set was used for the Sea- Tac rainfall region with a correction factor of 1.0. Documentation of the KCRTS input and output including descriptions of executable files, reservoirs, and times series is provided in Appendices C and D. Under developed conditions, stormwater from the site and offsite road improvements will be collected and treated onsite to basic water quality standards. A combined wetpond/detention pond will be used to manage runoff in the easterly basin. A small wetvault will provide water quality treatment to a portion of SE 1361h Street that bypasses the stormwater facility. A biofiltration swale will be used to manage runoff in the westerly basin. Level 2 RID standards are required by the King County Flow Application Maps and recommended by Lower Cedar River Basin and Nonpoint Action Plan. The natural discharge locations from the site will be maintained at the outlet of the proposed storm water facilities. Stormwater from the development in the easterly basin will be managed with a combined wetpond/detention facility. Stormwater from the development in the westerly basin will be managed with a detention vault facility followed by a biofiltration swale. Level 2 RID standards are proposed for both facilities. The stormwater facilities shown in Figure 6 meets Level 2 RID criteria and basic water quality requirements. Flow duration curves at the downstream point-of- compliance are provided in Figures 7 A and 7B. Peak flow rates for the downstream point-of- compliance, under existing and developed site conditions follow Figures 7 A and 7B. The downstream point-of-compliance includes runoff from portions of SE 1361 h Street that bypasses the stormwater facilities. The duration curves and peak flow rates, shown for existing and developed conditions, indicate that Level 2 RID criteria are met. The stormwater facility in the east basin requires approximately 117,770 cubic feet oflive storage, excluding a factor of safety, to meet Level 2 RID standards. The stormwater facility in the east basin requires approximately I 7,92lcubic feet of live storage, excluding a factor of safety, to meet Level 2 RID standards. A factor of safety of 5 to 10 percent will be added to the final design volume. Part E: Water Quality System Basic water quality standards apply to the site. A basic wetpond will provide treatment for the site's easterly basin. A small wetvault will provide treatment for a portion of road improvements along SE 136th Street that bypasses the easterly stormwater facility. A biofiltration swale will provide treatment for the site's westerly basin. Alternatively, a wetvault may be used to treat stormwater collected from the site's west basin. A treatment trade is proposed for stormwater collected from the road improvement area along SE 136th Street in the site's westerly basin to account for a small area of the road improvement that bypasses the westerly storm water facility. 4-4 Evenddl Plat p,./iminary 11R-June 2001 • Runoff from an area of existing pollution generating impervious surfaces equivalent to the area bypassed will be collected from SE 1361h Street and treated onsite. The required wetpool volumes for the treatment facilities were determined using equations provided in Chapter 6 of the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual. Basin areas, annual runoff volumes, VbNr ratios, and required volume for the wetpond are given in Table 4. 4-5 Evenddl Plat p.,,/iminary 11R-June 2001 -~:z.:··-:.~--~:: ·;---·.::.-~_:;_ .· lt--~ ~ ~ I • I • I • I • I • I ~---- 'deveast/ -~~-4.N,5-LZ&2ZJ.,C,, ,,r • .. -3~·srv a~ e~ . _. _. SJT~ESL ·r:. -1 -.,. /?1141\,.A(; 4' ~rbed(}VJre 1 4 V II 7 Fen I, ....'...!1 . ._.. -~ ;........ ·-· i ·-·-· T--Y 8 i 11 61332' 30'\II x'1oo°L ·x 7EII (INSIDE ~ TOP OF VAULT• 48Ui Offsite 4 AC ~ Area=O.S 'b~ \VAlER SURFACE-481.0 ear. OET.• 475.0 REll'D DET. 'IOI..• IB,000 CF 1. OET. 'IOI..• 2D,200 CF (B.7J'D) I _L_·I I 5'Wood~ ' l . J $E 1HIH S76IEB P.111.QY Y!l:ff I \ lo'\1 X 30'1. X &.5'0 (INSIDE DIY.) 10P OF WJCT• -.., . • , IWER SURFM:E-482.0 I ear. DET.-477.tJ ~ ....,..,., I • WLo-l,!lOO CF · ,y::_----~~~-d/l.f!i~_$tJ.%r4~~.:.:? "' I / . . . . <1r-~ ~& \ 1 4' / f-. -L ! / I k-----l.1_9, AC . ~/-·--, ~I'.: ,~ 47 ,Ji 51 ! 'Q , . \\ ~--·-·1--. ...L. ~ "'\ ,ID L . . I ' ,, ! ~ -'°-__! 43 ! 3!.--. . '·, / ~ "" ~ g_ __J ! A{! ! ,(i i / '· ' _\ . lCtlQ_: 11 "'2 I 4~1 ef 1 j 36 j 735 . V ;--I .... 4 tbeast 1 St.reef. . · / /\ . ~---' •~•=•1=•-' •=•'-L~ • .J, / 34 / / . I '-. -U'4t--¥ -'· /. I\ / --='" I ~ { •=•™t™ "4"™7" ...... " . : . / '1, l . . .,/ 33 ' ~ 158 I j73\\;' ·. e~Y .. Y1, ... ~·im i 75 .i,-14 . . /iJ 1----__ J ~-t·, ---/-/: i_~·-· , ! I 1--.,,. '-1-. £ 72 j ~ 32 :j . , 57 7. ~ /. ~i I ~---/-. 30 , -·-· -~ ( __ ~--·-·--! ,t \5 I i 58 . . · ~ ~----· • I • ...J.. ' ~ 1-59~1 I 71 I ~V31 j/ · Lf ._./_. TE _ T~:j !Q) __ /----,r; --· ,.£--~. ilfrf ! ~7~ ( a1/oo I ae Y ea ! !ll.._2£1ERw~~--- ~~-·:-1_r: ~i-t-·-~4 ~ ~S~g _J ·L_ I I l 1.::=:;::-====-~~=::::;::::::::;- J • I ~ _j__J_J "I Lat 7 / Rhse / t :Y , h AIIW-~~ . -. -. . i . . -. -. i < IOO i s. 7 -.rm ~ _____ _,,, .. 63 _! 84 i es~ ee 1v, :-L-1-..Z. ~ -=v h =x_..,,/~iH,~ !! " ~ ---..J:·+· --· . ·--'\J. " -. ;_..,, . _ _,,. k Bar 'i8.Kf/kii{1,[i8°~e~ I \ fence y ·· \j 1 f.(1 I / I 19 . ~ . 211: 22 . 23 ~4 . 25,, . 26 I . I I 1. ~ I A-.. I / 1..,7 f\ -L ~_j \ .-~ • I • I • I j, l'w ::E LLI 1--I- <( cnz ...J iii :s a.. ...J a,: Q. ...JI LLlz '"-' !;;: C> 0 z 3:rn uJ :::E L,J > a,:O :....,_J 0 Iii fll . ., ll< la ... 1111 . ll ~ ' :i 1"~ ,w .,;; ~ ::, I~ :~ bG ~ (9-_t? ___ - c::1 Ii: ' r.:l gs l m ~ l 5 ~ I N 1·· o a 1 ~--_.·· al ., " ·~ ...... ..-IVl ;<[ t-4 jW ·CJ:: ,O 'o ~ @n.tl1 ~ t .. D =11 • • ui u. 2. a, .. ;;_ ~ ii: 0.7 __,.__Existing --a -Developed 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 o+------+-----1-------+-------+---..1:1...---i 1.00E-05 1.00E-04 1.00E-03 1.00E-02 1.00E-01 1.00E+OO Probability of Exceedence Figure 7 A. Flow Duration Curves for RID -East Basin. Duration curves are shown at the downstream point of compliance in the easterly basin. The pond is designed to meet Level 2 RID standards. 4-7 • ) ) Predeveloped Peak Flow Rates -East Basin Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:exeast.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0. 645 2 2/09/01 18:00 0.891 1 100.00 0.990 0.200 7 1/05/02 16:00 0.645 2 25.00 0.960 0.517 3 2/28/03 3:00 0.517 3 10.00 0.900 0.037 8 3/24/04 19:00 0.508 4 5.00 0.800 0.303 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.457 5 3.00 0. 667 0.508 4 1/18/06 20:00 0.303 6 2.00 0.500 0. 457 5 11/24/06 4:00 0.200 7 1.30 0.231 o. 891 1 1/09/08 9:00 0.037 8 1.10 0. 091 Computed Peaks 0.809 50.00 0.980 Developed Peak Flow Rates -East Basin Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:poceast.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0. 611 2 2/09/01 19:00 1.13 1 100.00 0.990 0.177 7 1/05/02 16:00 0. 611 2 25.00 0.960 0. 517 3 3/06/03 20:00 0.517 3 10.00 0.900 0.182 6 8/26/04 2:00 0.472 4 5.00 0.800 0.173 8 1/05/05 8:00 0.214 5 3.00 0. 667 0.214 5 1/19/06 2:00 0.182 6 2.00 0.500 0. 472 4 11/24/06 6:00 0.177 7 1.30 0.231 1.13 1 1/09/08. 11:00 0.173 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.955 50.00 0.980 4-8 Evendell Plat Preliminary TJR-June 2001 0.2 _ _,__Existing --a -Developed 0.18 0.16 0.14 13- ~ 0.12 2-.. -/}_ ~ 0 ii: 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 1.00E-05 1.00E-04 1.00E-03 1.00E-02 1.00E-01 1.00E+OO Probability of Exceedence Figure 78. Flow Duration Curves for RID -West Basin. Duration curves are shown at the downstream point of compliance in the westerly basin. The pond is designed to meet Level 2 RID standards. 4-9 Predeveloped Peak Flow Rates -West Basin Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:exwest.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.138 2 2/09/01 18:00 0.235 1 100.00 0.990 0.059 7 1/05/02 16:00 0.138 2 25.00 o. 960 0.129 3 2/28/03 3:00 0.129 3 10.00 0.900 0.024 8 8/26/04 2:00 0.122 4 5.00 0.800 0.074 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.116 5 3.00 0. 667 0.122 4 1/18/06 16:00 0.074 6 2.00 0.500 0.116 5 11/24/06 4:00 0.059 7 1. 30 0.231 0 .235 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.024 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.202 50.00 0.980 Developed Peak Flow Rates -West Basin Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:pocwest.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.140 2 2/09/01 18:00 0.197 1 100.00 0.990 0.059 8 1/05/02 16:00 0 .140 2 25.00 0. 960 0.110 4 3/06/03 19:00 0.135 3 10.00 0.900 0. 067 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.110 4 5.00 0.800 0. 068 6 10/28/04 16:00 0.107 5 3.00 0. 667 0.107 5 1/18/06 20:00 0.068 6 2.00 0.500 0.135 3 11/24/06 4:00 0.067 7 1. 30 0.231 0.197 1 1/09/08 9:00 0.059 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.178 50.00 0.980 4-/0 Evenddl 1'1111 Preliminary 11R-June 2001 East Basin Residential Lots/Onsite Road 0.00 3.79 4.82 8.61 9,018 3.0 27,053 RID Tract 0.00 0.16 0.66 0.82 1,082 3.0 3,245 SE 136th Street Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 353 3.0 1,059 !Total o.ooJ 3.95! 5.71 J 9.66J J 10,452 J 31,357 J E tB. SE136hS I 5071 3.0 I 1,520 I as as1n -t treet mprovements SE 136th Street Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.33 '-'!T..:..otac...1 ___ _._ __ 0:..:..0:..:0.1.I _ __:.:o·.;:.;oo:.i.J __ __:.:o·:..:33"-J -___:o:.:.::.3~3 j ._j __ 5_01 ..... J 1,520 J West Basin* Residential Lots/Onsite Road 0.00 0.58 0.73 1.31 1,368 3.0 4,105 RID Tract 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 154 3.0 461 SE 136th Street Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 261 3.0 783 j ._T_ot_a1 ___ __._ __ o_.o_o..1..l _----"o.-'-5s_,_! ___ 1._oo_._! __ 1_.5-'-'8jj ~ __ 1~,7_83~j 5,349 i Mean annual storm= 0.47 • Either a wetvault or biofiltration swale will be used to treat water in the west basin. 4-11 '.6, '·Special Rep~rts and Studies ' A summary of special reports and studies conducted for the Evendell Plat is presented below. Table 5. Summary of Special Reports and Studies Study/Report Geotechnical/soils Wetlands Evendell Plat, King County, Washington. Wetland Delineation and Report Floodplains Groundwater Anadromous fisheries impacts Hydrology Level l Downstream Drainage Analysis (Section 3 Evendell Plat Preliminary Technical Information Report) Water quality Structural fill Emuldl 1'1111 Pre/imma,y 71R-June 2001 6-1 Date Conducted NIA June 2001 NIA NIA NIA January 2001 NIA NIA 7. Other Permits ' A summary of permits required for the Evendell Plat project is listed in the table below. Table 6. Summary of Other Permits Required Permit Onsite Sewage Disposal Onsite Well . Developer/Local Agency Agreement Hydraulic Project Approval NPDES Stormwater Fore st Practices Section 10, 401, 404 Evenddl Plat Preliminary 17R-Jwre 2110/ Required? No No No No Yes Yes No 7-1 Regulating Agency Seattle/King County Department of Health Seattle/King County Department of Health Washington State Department of Transportation Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Washington State Department of Ecology Washington State Department o'fNatupu Resources United States Army Corps of Engineers .· '•. ~ ' Construction activities required to develop the site will include the following: 0 clearing and grading, 0 earthwork ( excavation, filling, hauling), and 0 paving. An erosion and sedimentation control plan for the project is provided in Figure 8. Construction best management practices (BMPs) have been selected for each of the particular types of anticipated construction activities. Implementing proven BMPs at construction locations, such as minimizing exposed soil surfaces, and controlling erosion and sedimentation will reduce potential impacts on surface water. BMPs for the proposed types of construction activities are outlined below. Clearing Limits To prevent disturbance of project areas not designated for construction, a construction clearing limits fence or silt fence will be installed by the Contractor. These fences will be installed prior to clearing and grading activities where appropriate. Cover Measures Temporary and permanent cover measures will be provided by the Contractor to protect disturbed areas. Mulching will be used to provide immediate temporary protection from erosion and to enhance plant growth. Plastic covering may be used in order to protect cut and fill slopes and stockpiles and/or to encourage grass growth in newly seeded areas. Perimeter Protection In order to reduce the transport of sediment off-site, the Contractor will install filter fences as indicated on the drawings prior to grading activities. Equipment Parking and Storage of Materials Parking areas for vehicles and equipment on the construction site should be covered with gravel to prevent erosion and tracking of the underlying soil. Machinery and vehicles should be well maintained. In the event of a spill or leak of toxic materials, the incident should be reported to the Construction Site Supervisor and actions should immediately be taken to contain and cleanup the materials. 8-1 Evendell Plat Preliminary TIR-June 2001 Traffic Area Stabilization Stabilized pads of quarry spalls will be installed by the Contractor at all egress points from the project site to reduce the amount of sediment transported onto paved roads or other off-site areas by motor vehicles. Sediment Retention Sediment retention will be provided by silt fencing at the locations and dimensions shown on the drawings and shall be maintained by the Contractor. Wet Season Construction If soils are exposed during the period of October 1 to March 31, the Contractor will mulch and seed as much disturbed area as possible by the first week of October in order to provide grass cover for the wet season. The Contractor will also conform to the following wet season special prov1s10ns: a Apply cover measures to disturbed areas that are to remain unworked for more than two days. 0 Provide on-site stockpiles of cover materials sufficient to cover all disturbed areas. 0 Seed all areas that are to be unworked during the wet season by the end of the first week of October. a Apply mulch to all seeded areas for protection. a Provide construction road and parking lot stabilization areas for all sites. Maintenance The Contractor will maintain and review all TESC measures on a regular basis. Final Stabilization Prior to obtaining final construction approval, the site shall be stabilized, the structural TESC measures removed, and drainage facilities cleaned. Disturbed areas of the site should be vegetated or otherwise permanently stabilized. At a minimum, disturbed areas should be seeded and mulched to provide a high likelihood that sufficient cover will develop shortly after final approval. 8-3 Evenddl Plat Preliminary TIR-June 2001 Figure IO. Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Summary Development: Evendell Plat Date: 6-11-01 Location: King County Township 23N, Range 5E, Section 14 ENGINEER Name: Ed McCarthy Firm: Haozous Engineering, P.S. Address: 14816 SE I 16th Street Renton, WA 98059 Phone: ( 425\ 235-2707 Developed Site: 12 Acres Number of detention facilities on site: I Combined Wetpond/R/D I Vault Downstream Drainage Basins Lower Cedar River Number & type of water quality facilities on site: _I __ biofiltration swale (regular/wet/ or continuous inflow?) _I __ combined detention/WQ ponds __ flow dispersion trenches ___ combined detention/wetvault ___ compost filter __ filter strip ___ landscape management plan DEVELOPER Name: Mike Romano (representing U.S. Land Develonment, Inc.) Firm: U.S. Land Develooment Associates, Inc. Address: Clo Centurion Development Services 22617 8th Dr. SE Bothell, WA 98021 Phone: ( 425\ 486-2563 Number of lots: 75 single-family residences Number of infiltration facilities on site: 0 Immediate Maior Basin Orting Hills Cedar River __ sand filter (basic or large?) ___ sand filter, linear (basic or large?) ___ sand filter vault (basic or large?) _! __ vault _2 __ energy dissipation structure(s) Basic pond (basic or large?) ___ oil/water separator (baffle or coalescing plate?) catch basin inserts: Manufacturer __________________ _ ___ pre-settling pond ___ pre-settling structure: Manufacturer __________________ _ __ flow-splitter catch basin DESIGN INFORMATION Easterly Basin SE 136w Street Westerly Basin (Easterlv Basin) Water Quality Desi= Volume (CF\ 31,400 5,300 Biofiltration Swale Onsite Area (AC) 9.43 0.00 1.41 Offsite Area(AC) 0.56 0.33 0.36 Type of Storage Facility Combined Wetvault Vault Wetoond/R/D Reauired Live Storage Volume /CF) 118,000 NIA 18,000 .,,..._ The conveyance and water quality facilities for the Evendell Plat will not be privately maintained nor do they contain non-standard features. The table below specifies the maintenance requirements for each component of the storm water facility being constructed. Applicable maintenance requirements, taken from the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual, are referenced to the pages that follow. Table 7. Summary of Maintenance Requirements for Stormwater Facilities Maintenance Requirement 0 No. I -Detention Ponds 0 No. 4 -Control Structure Restrictor 0 No. 5 -Catch Basins 0 No. 6 -Debris Barriers 0 No. 10 -Conveyance Systems 0 No. 13 -Water Quality Facilities -Wetponds 0 No. 13 -Water Quality Facilities -Wetvaults 0 No. 13 -Water Quality Facilities -Biofilration Swales JO-I Evenddl Plat Preliminary 11R-June 2001 General Trash & Debris Poisonous Vegetation Pollution Unmowed Grass/ Ground Cover Rodent Holes Insects Tree Growth Side Slopes of Pond Erosion Storage Area Sediment Pond Dikes Settlements Emergency Rock Missing Overflow/Spillway Any trash and debris which exceed 1 cubic foot per 1,000 square feet (this is about equal to the amount of trash it would take to fill up one standard size office garbage can). In general, there should be no visual evidence of dumping. Any poisonous or nuisance vegetation which may constitute a hazard to County personnel or the public. Oil, gasoline, or other contaminants of one gallon or more Q! any amount found that could: 1) cause damage to plant, animal, or marine life; 2) constrtute a fire hazard; or 3) be flushed downstream during rain stomis. If facility is located in private residential area, mowing is needed when grass exceeds 18 inches in height. In other areas, the general policy is to make the pond site match adjacent ground cover and terrain as long as there is no interference with the function of the facility. Any evidence of rodent holes if facility is acting as a dam or bem,, or any evidence of water piping through dam or berm via rodent holes. When insects such as wasps and hornets interfere with maintenance activities. Tree growth does not allow maintei:iance access or interferes with maintenance activity (i.e., slope mowing, silt removal, vectoring, or equipment movements). If trees are not interfering with access, leave trees alone. Eroded damage over 2 inches deep where cause of damage is still present or where there is potential for continued erosion. Accumulated sediment that exceeds 10% of the designed pond depth. Any part of dike which has settled 4 inches lower than the design elevation. Only one layer of rock exists above native soil in area five square feet or larger, or any exposure of native soil at the top of out flow path of spillway. Rip-rap on inside slopes need not be replaced. 10-2 No danger of poisonous vegetation where County personnel or the public might normally be. (Coordination with Seattle-King County Health Department) No contaminants present other than a surface film. (Coordination with Seattle/King County Health Department) When mowing is needed, grass/ground cover should be mowed to 2 inches in height. Mowing of selected higher use areas rather than the entire slope may be acceptable for some situations. Rodents destroyed and dam or bem, repaired. (Coordination with Seattle/King County Health Department) Insects destroyed or removed from site. Trees do not hinder maintenance activities. Selectively cultivate trees such as alders for firewood. Slopes should be stabilized by using appropriate erosion control measure(s); e.g., rock reinforcement. planting of grass, compaction. Sediment cleaned out to designed pond shape and depth; pond re- seeded if necessary to control erosion. Dike should be built back to the design elevation. Replace rocks to design standards. NO. 4 -CONTROL STRUCTURE/FLOW RESTRICTOR Structural Damage Cleanout Gate Damaged or Missing Orifice Plate Damaged or Missing Obstructions Overflow Pipe Obstructions Manhole Catch Basin Distance between debris build-up and bottom of orifice plate is less than 1-1/2 feet. Structure is not securely attached to manhole wall and outlet pipe structure should support at least 1,000 lbs. of up or down pressure. Structure is not in upright position (allow up to 10% from plumb). Connections to outlet pipe are not watertight and show signs of rust. Any holes-other than designed holes-in the structure. Cleanout gate is not watertight or is missing. Gate cannot be moved up and down by one maintenance person. Chain leading to gate is missing or damaged. Gate is rusted over 50% of its surface area. Control device is not working properly due to missing, out of place, or bent orifice plate. Any trash, debris, sediment, or vegetation blocking the plate. Any trash or debris blocking (or having the potential of blocking) the overflow pipe. Structure securety attached to wall and outlet pipe. Structure in correct position. Connections to outlet pipe are water tight; structure repaired or replaced and works as designed. Structure has no holes other than designed holes. Gate is watertight and works as designed. Gate moves up and down easily and is watertight. Chain is in place and works as designed. Gate is repaired or replaced to meet design standards .. Plate is in place and works as designed. Plate is free of all obstructions and works as designed. Pipe is free of all obstructions and works as designed. See "Closed Detention Systems" Standards No. 3 See "Closed Detention Systems' Standards No. 3 See ·catch Basins· Standards No. 5 See 'Catch Basins" Standards No. 5 10-3 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 5 -CATCH BASINS Structure Damage to Frame and/or Top Slab Cracks in Basin Walls/ Bottom Sediment/ Misalignment Trash or debris of more than 1/2 cubic foot which is located immediately in front of the catch basin opening or is blocking capacity of the basin by more than 10% Trash or debris (in the basin) that exceeds 1/3 the depth from the bottom of basin to invert the lowest pipe into or out of the basin . Trash or debris in any inlet or outlet pipe blocking more than 1/3 of Its height. Dead animals or vegetation that could generate odors that could cause complaints or dangerous gases (e.g., methane) . Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic foot in volume Corner of frame extends more than 3/4 inch past curb face into the street (If applicable) . Top slab has holes larger than 2 square inches or cracks wider than 1/4 inch (intent is to make sure all material is running into basin) . Frame not sitting flush on top slab, i.e., separation of more than 3/4 inch of the frame from the top slab . Cracks wider than 1 /2 inch and longer than 3 feet, any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks, or maintenance person judges that structure is unsound . Cracks wider than 1 /2 inch and longer than 1 foot at the joint of any inleU outlet pipe or any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks. Basin has settled more than 1 inch or has rotated more than 2 inches out of alignment. 10-4 No Trash or debris located immediately in front of catch basin opening. No trash or debris in the catch basin. Inlet and outlet pipes free of trash or debris . No dead animals or vegetation present within the catch basin. No condition present which would attract or support the breeding of insects or rodents . Frame is even with curb. Top slab is free of holes and cracks . Frame is sitting flush on top slab. Basin replaced or repaired to design standards. No cracks more than 1/4 inch wide at the joint of inleUoutlet pipe. Basin replaced or repaired to design standards. NO. 5 • CATCH BASINS (CONTINUED) Catch Basin Cover Ladder Metal Grates (If Applicable) Vegetation Pollution Cover Not in Place locking Mechanism Not Working Cover Difficult to Remove Ladder Rungs Unsafe Trash and Debris Damaged or Missing. Presence of chemicals such as natural gas, oil and gasoline. Vegetation growing across and blocking more than 10% of the basin opening. Vegetation growing in inleUoutlet pipe joints that is more than six inches tall and less than six inches apart. Nonflammable chemicals of more than 1 /2 cubic foot per three feet of basin length. Cover is missing or only partially in place. Any open catch basin requires maintenance. Mechanism cannot be opened by on maintenance person with proper tools. Bolts into frame have less than 1/2 inch of thread. One maintenance person cannot remove lid after applying 80 lbs. of lift; intent is keep cover from sealing off access to maintenance. Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, misalignment, rust, cracks, or sharp edges. Grate with opening wider than 7/8 inch. Trash and debris that is blocking more than 20% of grate surface. Grate missing or broken member(s) of the grate. No flammable chemicals present. No vegetation blocking opening to basin. No vegetation or root growth present. No pollution present other than surface film. Catch basin cover is closed Mechanism opens with proper tools. Cover can be removed by one maintenance person. Ladder meets design standards and allows maintenance person safe access. Grate opening meets design standards. Grate free of trash and debris. Grate is in place and meets design standards. NO. 6 DEBRIS BARRIERS (E.G., TRASH RACKS) General Metal Damaged/ Missing Bars. lien'.Mali\tenance'ls'ii;~·~;;;:J·~¥:1,tResu1ts'Eii·ectec1 .. w11eril'1 ''" . ! i ': '.''!J1~ttlt~i(;ttt{~{lt 1~iti1~{trf:!t r~l~! Trash or debris that is plugging more than 20% of Barrier clear to receive capacity the openings in the barrier. flow. Bars are bent out of shape more than 3 inches. Bars are missing or entire barrier missing. Bars are loose and rust is causing 50% deterioration to any part of barrier. /0-5 Bars in place with no bends more than 314 inch. Bars in place according to design. Repair or replace barrier to design standards. NO. 10 -CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS (PIPES & DITCHES) Vegetation Damaged Vegetation that reduces free movement of water through pipes. Protective coating is damaged; rust is causing more than 50% deterioration to any part of pipe. All vegetation removed so water flows freely through pipes. Pipe repaired or replaced. Any dent that decreases the cross section area of Pipe repaired or replaced. Open Ditches Catch Basins Debris Barriers (e.g., Trash Rack) Trash & Debris Sediment Vegetation Erosion Damage to Slopes Rock Lining Out of Place or Missing (If Applicable). pipe by more than 20%. Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic foot per 1,000 square feet of ditch and slopes. Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20 % of the design depth. Vegetation that reduces free movement of water through ditches. See "Ponds" Standard No. 1 Maintenance person can see native soil beneath the rock lining. See "Catch Basins: Standard No. 5 See uDebris Barriers" Standard No.6 10-6 Trash and debris cleared from ditches. Ditch cleaned/ flushed of all sediment and debris so that it matches design. Water flows freely through ditches. See "Ponds" Standard No. 1 Replace rocks to design standards. See "Catch Basins" Standard No. 5 See MDebris Barriersn Standard No.6 NO. 13-WATER QUALITY FACILmES Trash and Debris Inlet/ Outlet Pipe Sediment Accumulation in Pond Bottom Oil Sheen on Water Erosion Settlement of Pond Dike/ Berm Rock Window Overflow Spillway Vegetation such as grass and weeds need to be mowed when it starts to impede aesthetics of pond. Mowing is generally required when height exceeds 18-inches. Mowed vegetation should be removed from areas where it could enter the pond, either when the pond level rises, or by rainfall runoff. Accumulation that exceeds 1 CF per 1000-SF of pond area. Inlet/ Outlet pipe clogged with sediment and/ or debris material. Sediment accumulations in pond bottom that exceeds the depth of sediment zone plus 6-inches, usually the first cell. Prevalent and visible oil sheen. Erosion of the pond's side slopes and/ or scouring of the pond bottom, that exceeds 6-inches, or where continued erosion is prevalent. Any part of these components that has settled 4- inches or lower than the design elevation, or inspector determines dike/ berm is unsound. Rock window is clogged with sediment. Rock is missing and soil is exposed at top of spillway or outside slope. 10-7 Vegetation should be mowed to 4 to 5 inches in height. Trees and bushes should be removed where they are interfering with pond maintenance activities. Trash and debris removed from pond. No clogging or blockage in the inlet and outlet piping. Removal of sediment from pond bottom. Removal of sediment from pond bottom. Slopes should be stabilized by using proper erosion control measures, and repair methods. Dike/ berm is repaired to specifications. Window is free of sediment and debris. Replace rocks to specifications. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 13-WATER QUALITY FACILITIES Wetvaults Wetvault Sediment Accumulation in Vault Damaged Pipes Access Cover Damaged/ Not Working Vault Structure Damaged Baffles Access Ladder Damage Trash and debris accumulated in vault, pipe or inlet/ outlet, (includes floatables and non- floatables) . Sediment accumulation in vault bottom that exceeds the depth of the sediment zone plus 6- inches . lnleV outlet piping damaged or broken and in need of repair . Cover cannot be opened or removed, especially by one person. Vault: Cracks wider than 1/2-inch and any evidence of soil particles entering the structure through the cracks, or maintenance/ inspection personnel determines that the vault is not structurally sound . Baffles corroding, cracking, warping and/ or showing signs of failure as determined by maintenance/ inspection staff . Ladder is corroded or deteriorated, not functioning property, missing rungs, has cracks and/ or misaligned. 10-8 Trash and debris removed from vault . Removal of sediment from vault. Pipe repaired and/ or replaced. Pipe repaired or replaced to proper working specifications. No cracks wider than 1/4-inch at the joint of the inleU outlet pipe. Vault is determined to be structurally sound. Repair or replace baffles to specifications. Ladder replaced or repaired to specifications, and is safe to use as determined by inspection personnel. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 13-WATER QUALITY FACILITIES Biofiltration Swales Sediment Accumulation Sediment depth exceeds 2-inches on Grass Layer Vegetation Inlet Outlet Pipe Trash and Debris Accumulation Erosion/ Scouring When the grass becomes excessively tall (greater than 10-inches); when nuisance weeds and other vegetation starts to take over. Inlet/ outlet pipe clogged with sediment and/ or debris. Trash and debris accumulated in the bio-swale. Where the bio-swale has eroded or scoured the bottom due to flow channelization, or higher flows. 10-9 No sediment deposits on grass layer of the bio-swale, which would impede filtration of runoff . Vegetation is mowed or nuisance vegetation is eradicated, such that flow not impeded. Grass should be mowed to a height between 4 inches and 9 inches . No clogging or blockage in the inlet and outlet piping . Trash and debris removed from bioswale. Bioswale should be re-graded and re.-seeded to specification, to eliminate channeled flow. Overseeded when bare spots are evident. King County Department of Natural Resources, 1998. King County Surface Water Design Manual. Seattle. King County Department of Natural Resources, 1997. Lower Cedar River Basin and Nonpoint Pollution Action Plan. Seattle. King County Department of Parks, Planning, and Resources, 1990. Sensitive Areas Map Folio. Seattle. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1973. Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington. Seattle. 11-1 Evendd/ Plat Prelimma,v 17R-.hme 2001 ••••• J V Photo Number 1 Date of Photo: 01/05/01 Location: Existing single-family residence in north oortion of oarcel. Description: The site currently contains one single-family residence, shed, and lawn area. f .. "• le . ;. ,:,> 4J $ \[:~· . ,. _,' · .. ;;a V Photo Number 2 Date of Photo: 01/05/01 Location: Northwest portion of parcel, looking south. Description: Cover types on the site include mature forest, pasture, lawn, wetland, and a single-family home. ,'.! 1·,1, ,_, ~t t~';.,· Evendell Plat -Offsite Drainage System eeeesv80 V Photo Number 3 Date of Photo: I O 1/05/0 I Location: Description: Location I in Fig_urej_,_ looking east. A drainage ditch flows to the east along the north boundary of the site and turns south on the site's east boundar V Photo Number 4 Date of Photo: Location: Description: '- 01/05/01 Location 8 in Figure 5, looking north. The open ditch along the east boundary of the site flows to the south along 160th Avenue SE. Evendell Plat -Offsite Drainage System Y Photo Number 1 Y Photo Number 2 Date of Photo: 01/05/01 Date of Photo : 01/05/01 Location: Existing single-family residence in north Location: Northwest portion of parcel, looking south. portion of parcel. Description: The site currently contains one single-family residence, shed, and lawn area. Description: Cover types on the site include mature forest, pasture, lawn, wetland, and a single-family home. ~~ ... ;, 4l Evendell Plat -Offsite Drainage System 'Y Photo Number 3 Date of Photo: I 01/05/01 Location: Description: Location 1 in Figure 5, looking east. A drainage ditch flows to the east along the north boundary of the site and turns south on the site's east bound 'Y Photo Number 4 Date of Photo: Location: Description: 0 1/05/01 Location 8 in Figure 5 , looking north. The open ditch along the east boundary of the site flows to the south along 160th A venue SE. Evendell Plat -Offsite Drainage System Table A.1. Summary of Downstream Drainage Complaints Complaint Date Property Owner Description of Complaint Number 89-0867 13802 160th Avenue SE Drainage complaint not available. 95-0107 2/01/95 Steve Kohr Broken culvert at entrance to cul-de-sac. 15641 SE 138th Place 97-0206 1/10/97 Don Gregg Offsite flows impacting private property. 16046 SE 142°d Place Backyard flooded with larger storms. Septic system operation impacted. Investigated for Neighborhood Drainage Assistance Program. 97-0318 14038 56th Avenue SE Flooding due to plugged culvert. Drainage complaint is a claim and is not currently available. 97-0423 14028 160th A venue SE Roadside flooding -overflow of ditch along 160th A venue SE. Drainage complaint not available. 98-0202 3/19/97 Paul Huff Drainage from neighbor impacting low area of 14312 160th Avenue SE private property. Evenddl Plat Preliminary TIR -June 200 / • l:J t ' '• 5 t I T [ 9~-[ I I J' -' TITLE Drainage Complaints -From the Files of KCWLRD • • bll ClllrtY wmr n....., r11a1• 11¥11111-tnmaa llntal 111:tbi ~ ...... Pl1n1ed : 12/28/00 7:36:58 AM -..i 1"' lffl If,,,.. .... If,,,.. c-ta ln .... ..... &:Ill 1974-0095 C RIPRAP 15225 JONES RD ROCKS/OIKE/15219 JONES RD/CEDAR RIV 657M 1974--0096 C RIPRAP 15224 JONES RO ROCK/DIKE/JONES RO/CEDAR RIVER 657M 1974-0103 C 15631 JONES ROSE W/0 BACKFILUJONES RO 657A4 1974-0106 C DRNG 15005 JONES RO DITCH/ALONG CEDAR 657A4 1975-0128 C FLOG 16418 SE 145TH ST STORM SEWERS/BRIARWOOD S 65784 1976-0084 C 156TH PL SE/JONES RD DAMAGE ALONG RD/CEDAR RIVER AREA 657A4 1976-0091 C DEBRI 15463 SE JONES RD CEDAR RIVER 657A4 1979-0090 C ORN G 14406 162ND AV SE 65783 1980-01 17 C ORNG 13405 158THAVE SE 657A2 1981-0316 C 15035 SE JONES RD DIKE JETIY/CEDAR RIVER 657A4 1982-0520 C FLOG 13612 160THAVESE 65782 1982-0521 C FLOG 16426 SE 145TH PL BRIARWOOD AREA 65784 1983-0357 C DRNG 14827 SE JONES RO CHNL OVERFLO/MADSEN CRK 657A4 1983-0386 C DRNG 15243 SE 132ND ST DRNG DITCH/SE 132ND ST/152ND AVE SE 657A2 1983-0387 C FLOG 14063 171ST AVE SE BRIARWOOD AREA 65783 1984-0224 C FLOG 16211 SE 145TH ST 65784 1985-0710 E FILL 15035 SE JONES RO KG CTY NOT RESP-WILLnotEN F 657A4 1986-0372 C VI OLATE 15817 SE JONES RD MOBILE HOME IN FLOOD PLAIN 657A4 1986-0372 E ILLDVLT 15817 SE JONES RO TO BALD FOR CM(CHK STAT BY CMDT). 657A4 1986-0378 C FLOG 13129 160TH AVE SE BLOCKED DITC H 65782 1986-0437 C CULVERT 15252 SE 142ND PL INSTALLATION-NEED CB 657A3 1986-0651 C FILLING 15045 SE JO N ES RD SEE 86-0745,1158 657A4 1986-0745 C FILL 15045 SE JONES RD ILLEGAL FILL-CEDAR RIVER 657A4 1986-0812 C EROSION 15421 SE JONES RD CEDAR RIVER 657A4 1986-11 58 C FLOG 15059 SE JONES RD SEE: 86-0745 BRAMBLETT 88-0745 657A4 1987-0430 C TRFD TO SWM-FM/RD DRNG. 65782 1987-0430 ER OH/SWM DIV PLY . 65782 1987-0430 NOA OH/SWM DIV PLY. 65782 1987-0496 C DRNG 16423 SE 135TH ST SEEPAGE 65782 1987-0589 C SEE 87-0430 WILSON. 65782 1987-0593 C DRNG 16904 SE 136TH ST ORNG ESMT WATER/DITCH NEEDS MAINT 65782 1987-1001 X FILL 16861 SE JONES RD I LLEGAL FILL IN FLDPLAIN 65784 1988-0377 C DRNG 14250 161ST AVE SE H AZARDOUS POND OH/TO CM. 06/10/89 65783 1989-0020 C FILL 13400 168THAVE SE NEAR DRNG CHNL 65782 1989-0086 C ORNG 14820 154TH PL SE IN STALLING DRAINAGE 657A4 1989-0863 C ORNG 13224 168TH AVE SE DITCH CLEANING/LOSING YARD 65782 1989-0867 CL DRNG 13802 160TH AVE SE CL#12735 DUE APRIL 65782 Page 1 ot4 TTTtE t1Aozo~J c~QmccruN<Q. r .1 Drainage Complaints -From the Flies of KCWLRD • CIIIIIIII : ,,...,,,.. _. 1990-0318 C FLOG 1990-04'49 C ORNG 19II0-0518 CL FLOG 1990-0590 C ORNG 1990-0702 CL FLOG 1990-07'48 CL FLOG 1990-0793 CL FLOG 1990-0931 C ORNG 1990-0956 CL FLOG 1990-1023 C ORNG 1990-1101 C EASEM'T 1990-1101 E EASEMENT 1990-1280 C ORNG 1990-1343 C ORNG 1990-1503 C ORNG 1990-1509 C EROSION 1990-1542 C FLOG 1990-1625 C EROSION 1990-1673 C EROSION 1990-1684 C EROSION 1991-0064 C FLOG 1991-0064 SR FLOG 1991-0188 C ORNG 1991-0188 E ORNG 1991-0322 C FLOG 1991-0422 C ORNG 1991-0422 SR DRNG 1991-0688 C ORNG 1991-0750 C FILL 1991-0954 C FLOODING 1991-1000 C DRAINAGE 1991-1147 C DRAINAGE 1992-0082 C DRAINAGE 1992-0082 E DRAINAGE 1992-0082 ER DRAINAGE 1992-0082 PN DRAINAGE 1993-0252 C ORNG 1993-0252 E ORNG 1993-0521 C DRAINAGE 1993-05 28 C DRAINAGE MAOZO\I J CNQIN CCmNQ. , .S. ...... ,,.. c-11 In .... 15225 SE JONES RO DIVERTED DITCH/STORM EVENT 657A4 14943 SE JONES RO DEBES IN CREEK/STORM EVENT 657A4 15225 SE JONES RD Cl.#12839 657A4 1'4933 SE JONES RO BACKUP INTO MADSEN CREEK/STORM 657A4 15059 SE JONES RO Cl.#12933 SEE TULLY DUE AUGUST 857A4 15023 SE JONES RO Cl.#12989 SEE TULLY DUE AUGUST 657M 15035 SE JONES RO WASHE OOUT ORIVEWAY/CL#13019 SEE 657A4 16423 SE 135TH ST SWAMP IN NEXT LOT/STORM 65782 15226 SE JONES RO MUD FROM CLOGGED CULVERT/Cl#1313 657A4 15408 SE JONES RO HOUSE MOVED IN NEAR CEDAR RIVER 657A4 16516 SE 1'49TH ST ON LOT BUILD ADDITION 65784 16516 SE 149TH ST MET ON SITE WILL SUBMIT PROPOSED S 65784 14926 165TH PL SE ONTO 0/W AT CUL OE SAC 65784 1'4920 163ROCT SE DAMAGED PVT DRAIN 65784 15025 156TH PL SE PIPE OUTFALL TO RIVER 657A4 14250 154TH PLACE SE CULVERT DAMAGE ANO SLIDE IN RAVINE 657A4 16448 SE JONES RO WATER OVER ROADWAY/OUT OF BANKS 65784 15633 SE JONES RO OF RIVERBANK/FAILED LEVEE 657A4 14908 SE JONES RO CEDAR RIVER BANK 657A4 17055 SE JONES RO REPAIR OF DIKE OF RIVER 65784 16426 SE 145TH R/0 PLUGGED/NO DRAINAGE 65784 16426 SE 145TH ROST FM ADO TO OLDS/OFF 657B4 16400 SE 143RD PLACE BROKEN PIPE 65783 143RD SE 164THAVE SE BROKEN PIPE 65783 16418 SE 145TH ST PLUGGED PVT DRAIN 65784 16448 SE JONES RD ROCKS AND DEBRIS FROM RAVINE 65784 16448 SE JONES RO OH/RORNGCM 05/11/91 SEE 91-0530 65784 15243 SE 132ND ST BACKYARD IS UNUSABLE 657A2 13008 156THAVE SE IN DRAINAGE AREA 657A2 15606 SE 143RD ST STORM EVENT C/B OVERFLOW 657A3 13535 160TH AVE SE MAINTAINENCE OF UNOPEN R.O.W. OITC 65782 14506 165THAVE SE WATER PONDING IN ROAD 65784 12817 162ND SE 65782 12817 162ND SE 65782 12817 162ND SE (lntAcByCmOt) 65782 12817 162ND SE 65782 16410 SE 143RD PLACE TURNED TOE 65783 16410 SE 143RD PLACE CHECK STAT BY CMOT DATE 65783 13301 SE 160TH PLACE BROKEN WATER LINE 65782 13301 SE 160TH PLACE SEE 93-0521 65782 Page 2 of 4 TTTlE Drainage Complaints -From the Files of KCWLRD • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • re • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • c..l*t '"' '"' " .... .......... c-11 1111'11 ... ..... ca 1993-0724 C FLOG 13516 164THAVE SE FLOODING 65782 1993-0724 RN FLOG 13516 164THAVE SE FLOODING IN WETLAND ON PROPERTY 65782 1993-0752 WQC DUMPING 16861 SE JONES RO 65794 1993-0752 WOE DUMPING 16861 SE JONES RO SEDIMENT FROM WELL DRILLING 65794 1993-1063 C HOLE 16519 SE 149THST HOLE IN ROAD SHOULDER 65784 1994-0326 C ORNG 13200 156TH AVEY RD SE NEW UPSTREAM CONSTRUCTION • Will 657A2 1994-0538 C HAZARD 16519 SE 149THST NEW KC DITCH IN YARD IS A HAZARD 65794 1994-1011 C ORNG SE 132ND & 156TH A SE DIRECT DISCHARGE FROM PLAT OEVELO 657A2 1995-0107 C CULVERT? 15641 SE 138TH PL POSSIBLE GROUNDWATER IMPACT TO S 65783 1995-0715 C RUNOFF 164XX SE 135TH ST ROAD CULVERT DISCHARGE HIST DRNG 65782 1995-0907 C DRAINAGE 13100 164THAVE SE LACK OF CONVEYANCE IN UNOPENED R/ 65782 1995-0907 R DRAINAGE 13100 164THAVE SE LACK OF CONVEYANCE IN UNOPENED R/ 65782 1995-1070 C CREEK 15915 SE 148TH ST STREAM FLOW INFO REQUEST 65784 1996-0039 C DRNG 15609 SE 128TH ST NO INFORMATION AVAILABLE 65782 1996-0289 C FLOG 15225 162NDAVE SE GROUNDWATER STREAM IMPACT PVT PR 65794 1996-0289 R FLOG 15225 162NDAVE SE GROUNDWATER STREAM IMPACT PVT PR 65784 1996-0376 co SEEPAGE 15225 162NOAVE SE SEE 96-0289 DUP 65794 1996-0556 C RUNOFF 14301 166TH PL SE APPARENT GROUNDWATER SURFACING 65783 1996--0556 R RUNOFF 14301 166TH PL SE APPARENT GROUNDWATER SURFACING 65783 1996-0869 C FLOG 15035 SE JONES RO HIGH FLOW PONDING PVT PROP NO OUT 657A4 1996-0869 NOA FLOG 15035 SE JONES RO HIGH FLOW PONDING PVT PROP NO OUT 657A4 1996-0869 R FLOG 15035 SE JONES RD HIGH FLOW PONDING PVT PROP NO OUT 657A4 1996--0870 C R/0 POND 15XXX SE 143RD ST KIDS USING POND FOR DIRT BIKES 657A3 1996-1050 CL FLOG 15010 156TH PL SE REIMBURSMENT FOR CLEAN UP WORK IN 657A4 1996-1253 C ORNG/PIP 15226 162NDAVE SE PVT ORNG INSTALLATION IMPACT ROAD? 65794 1996-1253 NOA ORNG/PIP 15226 162NDAVE SE PVT DRNG INSTALLATION IMPACT ROAD? 65794 1996-1253 R DRNG/PIP 15226 162NDAVE SE PVT DRNG INSTALLATION IMPACT ROAD? 65784 1996-1557 WOA CONSULT 13203 156THAVE SE BCW SITE CONSULTATION 657A2 1996-1724 C FLOG 14206 164TH AVE SE OFFSITE FLOW IMPACTING PVT PROP 65783 1996-1762 C FLOG 15059 SE JONES RD DAMAGE TO ORNG OUTFALL TO CEDAR R 657A4 1997-0056 C DITCH 1321 5 154THAVE SE 657A2 1997-0056 R DITCH 13215 154THAVE SE 657A2 1997-0203 C FLOG 14028 160TH AVE SE OVERFLOW FROM D/W CULV IMPACT PVT 65783 1997-0206 C FLOG 16046 SE 142ND PL OFFSITE FLOW IMPACTING PRIVATE PRO 65763 1997-0206 NOA FLOG 16046 SE 142ND PL OFFSITE FLOW IMPACTING PRIVATE PRO 65763 1997-0206 R FLOG 16046 SE 142ND PL OFFSITE FLOW IMPACTING PRIVATE PRO 65763 1997-0318 CL CLAIM 14038 56THAVE SE FLOODING DUE TO PLUGGED CULVERT 657A3 1997-0423 CL FLOG 14028 160THAVE SE ROADSIDE DITCH OVERFLOW-160TH AVE 65783 1997-0484 C DRAINAGE 15701 138TH PL SE PROPERTY DEV CONCERNS PVT DRNG 657A3 1997-0524 C EROSION 14631 156THAV E SE NATURAL SLIDE AREA ADJACENT TO PIP 657A4 Page 3 ol4 TTI1.E ri~O ZO\I J CNQINCCRINQ, II' j_ Drainage Complaints -From the Flies of KCWLRD '-= ,,.. ...... ......... Clalltl Tlrll .. _. 1997--0859 FCR VANDALIS 167TH PL SE&SE 1 .. TH VANDALISM TO R/0 IDENTIFICATION SIGN 65783 1997.()917 FCR DRNPOND 145TH SE PL8TWN 150&151 PL NEIGH KIDS DIGGING IN POND SIDE SLOP 657A3 1997-1072 C STUMPS 15405 SE JONES RD STUMPS STOCKPILED FOR CO PROJECT 657M 1997-1432 C DRAINAGE 15413 SE 133ROST LOT DRAINAGE PVT DRNG SYS CB LOWE 657"2 1997-1493 FCR PONO 1&426 SE 145TH ST INFILTRATION POND NOT HANDLING lAR 65784 1998-0152 C DRAINAGE 13115 158THAVE SE PVT PROPERTY IMPACT DUE TO NTRL DR 65782 1998-0192 FCR WASTE 15006 SE 145TH PL DOG WASTE SIGN REQUESTED 657A3 1998--0202 C DRAINAGE 1"4312 160THAVE SE LOW AREA PVT PROP ADJ PROP RAISED 65783 1998-0322 C TREES 14232 150TH PL SE TREE FALL DAM FENCE. NOT LDSU F'ACI 657A3 1998-0"475 woe ALGAE 16713 SE JONES RD ALGAE RELEASE FROM FISH PONO 657B4 1998-0"475 WQR ALGAE 16713 SE JONES RO ALGAE RELEASE FROM FISH PONO 65784 1996-0931 wac FILL 12813 163RDAVE SE DUMPING OF COL ADJ TO DRAINAGE SYS 65783 1999-0059 CL TREE 1'4334 166TH PL SE TREE FALL DAMAGED FENCE 65783 1999-0225 wac DUMPING 15921 SE 1"8TH ST DUMPING ON PVT PROP YARD WASTE/OE 6578"4 1999-0297 FCR RDMAINT 15006 SE 1"45TH PL REQUEST TO REPLACE BOLLARDS AND L 657M 2000-0322 woe WQI 13612 160THAVE SE APPARENT IRON OXIDE BACTERIA IN DIS 65782 2000-0666 FCR MNM 163XX SE 1"45THST REQUEST TO INSTALL ADDITIONAL TRAS 65784 2000-067"4 FCR MMG 18225 SE 1"45THST DUMPING/STOCKPILING OF LUMBER ON 65794 2000-067"4 R MMG 16225 SE 1"45TH ST DUMPING/STOCKPILING OF LUMBER ON 65784 2000-0703 FCR MNM 16225 SE 1"45TH ST CB DOES NOT HAVE LOCKING LID. FENC 65784 2000-0731 FCR MMG 1"4210 1"49TH PL SE OEVLEOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF REN 657A3 2000-0731 WOE WQO 1"4210 1"49TH PL SE OEVLEOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF REN 657A3 2000-0731 WQR MMG 14210 1"49TH PL SE DEVLEOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF REN 657A3 Page 4 or• TITLE tlAOZO~J CNQ~~~CCRIN Q, f' .S. Drainage Complaints -From the Flies of KCWLRD • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • J~. 8.2001 s :03f'M. Kc loLRD N0.642 • ~-2~ r ~ n. , KING COUNTY SUAFACE WATER MANAGEMENT OMSION " DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT Page 1: lNVESTIGATlON 'REQUesT Type ___ C. __ R Dtltl: OK'd by: Fle·No. 95-0107 Do..-.ldfrom: (l'le&N pilnl plalnly "" -11111e11. ~"'· NAME: Ko b c , Sir;(e, (wlFe, Shelly i $ hCn'!4!.) PHONE ~35-J(,97 ADDRESS: /5(;, ¥ 1 SE t ,a.,.., e J... City _______ State __ :zip __ _ Plat name: tf ose-~ Ade/ Other agenclo1 lnvotwc:1: Basin~ Counclt Dist 12 Charge No: I.Dt No:// 81ock No; No Field IIWMtlgatlon N11ded --- ~ Kroll 811 £ RESPONSE:. Citizen notlll8d on ___ by _ phone _ letter _ In person DISPOSITION: Turned to ___ on ____ by __ _ OR: No turther action r9commendecl becausi _ Leac:t agency has been notffied: _ Problem haa been corrected. -::::""No-pro""'""'bl,...em-ha_s_be-en.....,...,ld-ent-lfled,,,,_,..._ ----P,...,,ior,.......,1nves1--,,1ga,....-,,11,...on-11d.,..d,...re-:-sses=-=pro=bl'em -S.•FII•• . _ Private problem -NDAP will not comld., Nell&JU: _ Water originates on111te and/or on neighboring parcel l...ocatlon is out.aide SWM Service Aru. DA'TE CLOSED :_;__/__/_ by: __ TTT1.E Other (Specify): Drainage Complaints -From the Files of KCWLRD JA'l. 8.2001 KC lol.RD • N0.642 p 3r3 . •. •• -:. {)~ /.' KINQ-80~ SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DMste1• : ·· L../ DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION R.m>ORT .a . , ,.. ,; . INVEIT1GATION1U!OU~ . Type....;;;'--:;.__ R~ by: ~ Date: @& ~K'd .bv: A•~o. 97-;)()v:, . -R,-!vwl ~ ·, (PllaM pllnt P~ tw Wftl!lnO). •• . ~~ . ~) ~. . f]y,.,; '~ Gr. . . . . PHONI! Z35-(JltiJ8'_ . . ..:ODfU!SS: ~ ·:z?S:'/o2_:!t!Ji City~ .State_ ZJpfflB • . . I . . ~ d prabltrn. I dJll'want · , 1 • , \ Plat·~e: · ~i'-1 l EA Li?r>T Other agancln twolwd: .. . z_.:.tf::. 2-3 · S-Paroel No. 7.2 S: ~7Q-O//O 1/4 . I T " -. • • Lot No: i / . Block Nol . No .Flelcf lnwsm!atlon Needed __ _ ~ ·Th.Bros: Now~574, 8ufn.1£d!i.· Counci DIil /:2., Charge No •• · ___ _ • Old :3/SF~ _ Lead 11Qengy ta. bean notllled: ---,:·.--......,...,-.---,---,-..,==------..:'.:r.:::-;=::-==:-:.:r::r:::=::::--::=i _ Problem ha.a been corrected. _ No problem ha, been Identified. Prior lnvutlgaUon addresses prot . . . -. Se•Fil•# • _ Pdvat• problem • NDAP w,71 nof con~lder b•ceun.· ·: _waiar oliglnatH onaJte ard/or on nalghboc1ng parcel _. t.oc.tl~~II outside SWM Servloe jlrea.. . . OATf.'?LOS'c.D:.i.uJ~~ by:-t.2-~ ~ Other (Specify): ,. 1 · • . J 1~17.J j· TTTlE tlAOZO\IJ tNQl~CCRINQ, r ~. Drainage Complaints -From the Flies of KCWLRD • • • • • • • .I I • • • • • • • . , • • J~. 8 .2001 5:04PM KC "'-RD ~ ... .. , Coroplaint Sl7-206; Don~ 16046 SE 14'2""' PL. R.nton lnvesbpted by-Seu Groom on 01/14/97 N0 .642 P.41'9 Don Greig bu liwd at the above rdlmnced loc:atiOll llncc the early 60& (hi• house wu ICCOnd built ln the dcvdopmea~. Surface atonn WIit.er tlaws bqan flooding his,... approximately 11~-e years ago , At bis own expense at 1hat. tin,e be broucbt a 'back hoe In ,o cut a 4rainage dill:h alOD& the back 11.c!e at his property, 'Ibis open trench prOYf&:t nlieC during -predpllation .-n. lllrlace walQ' 1DOYC& arOlllld hi• propcny. Stonn water doei breech ~e top ~onally. The ditch fills ledhnenu up and be clears tho dileh ar debris ma 110&11 dO'Ml and mhlces 11ow. Be Miks the dl'aillqe ditch duriq stmm evtnll (lie -'t around for the last ltOT'III event) ID oblerve its t\w:tionality a.s a ~n u well. He wanu tbe cmw:iaae to continue down 160• Ave SE matea4 or a ~ l)'ltCID ll'Olllld his ml nef,dlbar'1 property. Appmndy, 11 de9clopmmt nort.b at'.hi, propen,_bu lnarcued additional runalfia CODCCDtl'llted lm.o the drainage along 160• Ave SB and sublcqucntty l'WlS'tO his properl;Y. 160th Ave S .E . Stllldiq wau:r, nmo.tf from 160• ATC SE dillcbarpa lm.o this ... Lo,r pertC\ltion. Orea ujd the IIDd Clll 't be~ · bccanse they don't have the percolation fof iDmtratian ar Mptic: sys1e1m. Drama~,tJJ Ditch "1 SE 142nd Place TTTl£ Drainage Complaints -From the Files of KCWLRD J/:fi, 8. 2001 KC lol.RD -------- TO: l'Ii.. JUI: IIDAP :nJU.~TIOIII l'OR OOMPU.1.11'1' ll'O. 11046 Q 142111D PLAc:s 1'mrTOII CXIICPLAX)ff Clla.OIIOU>GY I aaIOUllU. 1.-10-97 !17-0206 CIUIQO 2311-0168 ruz.o :nrv 1-1,-,1 ar noui C1'00K n:su, a:v&L. 3-7-n n AJ.AJf Kll'Dlt.S. OLD l'U,•a t •m11 Pl.• ... •N tbtt attaobad drd.~ OOlllplaint 1n .. eti9ati.on reJIC)rt da~d 1-14•97 by 8aan Grooe,. ruau:••, 8!.llce the probl--et:• &l.l ot the IIIDAP proj-t criteria l.S.ated bel.ow, .S.t qval.l.f.1.e• tor and ha• b .. n inveat.l.9ated under the 1'l>AP progr&SD. • The prol:>l..,. a.I.ta .I.• within the lrWM ••rvice araa and doe• not in•olve a 111\9 County (KC) code violatioa, • The problem •ite •howa ••idence at or reported localicad flooding, eroaion and/or &ediaentation wJ.tbin th• off road draina9e •Yet..,. on privat• raaidentlal and/or COIMlllrclal property dua in part to later upatream de•elopnent. • Th• problem la cauaad by aurface water from nor• th&II ona adjoining property. son.s, According to tha ltC eoila aap, th• aite 1• located J.n the tallowing •oil aaaooiation: ALDS~NOOD A880CIATI0lf1 .NOdarately ... 11 drained undulating to hilly aoil• that have daaae, vary ,lowly permaable glacial till at a depth ot 20 to •o .s.nch••J on upland• and terrace&. I -t with Kr. Gra119 on March 7th and toured hi• property. A• davelopaent oonti.nu•• i.n the apprcKi.m&ta 60 acre drainage beain north ot hia property: 11\0re drainage water baa bean routed aouth into the pond located juet Inf of hi• property which then drain• •••t and eouth a.round the adga of hie prope~ty, 1 11AOZO\U CNQmCCr<INQ. P' .S. Drainage Complaints -From the Flies of KCWLRD J~. 8.2001 KC i.LRD N0 .642 P.6/9 <?7-JO~ Re requeated that the drainage flowi.n; •outh along the eaat eJ.d• of 160th A,ranu. 81 be rerouted etraight acnith along tbe •••t •Lde of 110~ pa.et 8B 142nd ~lac• rath•r than the current rout• tthJ.oh f'lOWlf •aat and aouth around bta p~y. Mr. Gc1199 atate4 that aevaral. l.ol\9 tft1l raai.4ent• ha,ra tol.d hiitl the dr&Uage u•ed to fl.ow straight aouth al.ong the veat and eaet aidee of 160th al.l th• vay down to as 1441:tl . X atated that -l' be true but tl)e -i.1Jt1n9 4r&iQA9e pattern i.• ol.4 and olll:lnOt be raviaed becauae it ie conaidared the eata!:lli•hed 4rai.n&99 pattern for hi• area. ·· · I revi.-d hi• and hi• two nai.9hl>or• • draJ.l\a9e nlated ~• IID4 · ecortld th• probl.-at 14 with hi.a 9ar49e and aept.ic ay9tea 1-p&eta and :rar.1 daaag• to two~·· Although the l.eat f-,...r• ba..,. N- eapecially -t and l>ad, I rated tlle .-nt frequency at 10 or 0110. .,,..ry 2-~ yea.ra whiah i• IIIY eniaate of the frequency of how often bi• aept.ic ayatem wUl be e.-rely 1-paA:ted onr the lon9 term. Mr, Gragg eta~ that bi.a pun,pe4 ef'f'luent aepti.o •:r•t-haa worleed fine for the ti.rat 15 years. HOW<ffer, ha ha• b\lriled up four ~· wi.thJ.n the la.at thrwa :rearm du• to the Lnoreaeed groundwater f'lawa into hi• aepti.c tank/drainf'Leld ar.a. l'r<IID hi.• w.t/dry ••••on obaervati.ona, he ie convinced that -•t of the groundwater -• free the 4.rai.J\a.ge di.toh located j'1et a.boYe hie drai.!dield. We reviewed way• of protectLng his •epti.o dr~ield from the ~nt of groundwater froaa the uphJ.11 pond a.nd drainage ditch. 'IJe di•~•••d wayv to eeal. the earthen 4.l.tch iteel.f uei.ng a piaatio lU\ar or a iarge half round or full pipe ••otion• alofl9 about 50 f .. t of ditch abcwe hi• drainfield, I pointed out that oon•iderable groundwater ,nay •till fl.ow f'rom north to eo..th below th• ditch •action •o that •••ling tbe ditch may not •olva the problem. Depending on tha depth to ~an, an impervioue vertical laytr of pla•tic or bentonit• al,u:ry located upbi.ll of bi• drainfiel4 between hie draU1field and the ditch would probably be th• a .. iaet and mo•t effeeti.-. solution to thia pTOl>l ... rhi• i•~iO\I• layer W0\1ld run f rom tba qr011nd aurfaoe down to the hardpan layer where it would be ltayed down i.llto the hardpan layer. BecauH •uch a layer would re•triet the flow of ground water, higher groundwater level• 11\i.ght reault in thi• part of Gragg'• ya.rd with 1110re grounl!vater •urfacin; during the 'Witt ••••on ••pacially near eaoh end of eucb an i.mpe:neiou• wall re•ulting in t110ra wet vaaaon aurface water •••page/flow• and icy conditione on portion• of Kr. Cragg'• dri,,.way. ror any work thie oloae to the drainf i eld, any yard drain or ifflpervioua facility of thia kind would have to be reviewed and approv..S by the Xing county Heal.th Departmant (Wayne Ol•en at 296-9737). 2 TTT1.E Drainage Complaints -From the Files of KCWLRD J~. 8.2001 5105PM KC i.t..RD P .7~ 97-JO~ Mr. Or&99 i• conoarDe<t ak>o\lt c:onti.n1>inq up•t:reaa deYalopaent whiob tJ1)ioally r••ult• in aora aurfaoa watar fl;w• through hi• drainage ditch aDd occaa~na.l.ly .i..nt:o hL• yard. 1 aapla.Lnad th&t for l~ *-lopaenta ""9re eon tllan 5,000 •'l'l&re t'•et of iilperorlou.a •u.l'f•-• are oonat:ruotad, th.a devel.oper•• engf.nae.r ia only required i:o reY1Aw. 1t.b.e ~ai.Aag• er•t-·• o,q,&oit7 Q to o-~arter ot • ai1• dOW11etre-from th.a l)ropo•ad plat•• outlft poi.At. J'or •Lrl9l• bolaeaitaa, then ia aoraal.l.7 no dow,istr-anal.yai• required au09 there ia unally l.eH tihu 5,000 •~are feet of nev .iapar,,i.oqa aw:faoea oon•truoted. I 911999st..S tbat Mr. ar&99 look for J>evalopaent aJ.gna al.oaq uotll aortb of hi• ~. When be •N• new aivn•, he can attend public b-rinq• and vri'--l.ttara axpn,••in9 bu OOl\cena• and outlLnLnq bi• dra~ga ~ct •• noa.ar acoa.s -1,0 Jlo •ol1ation to thia drainage probl-waa identi fied , Mr. Ora~ requaatad t:bat -clean out hie drainage di.toh. We offer.d to clean out part of hi• ditch if our oontracrtor oan get th• nac•••ary e~i .P1119nt freon Gragg•a dri•..,ay into the ditch. 3 TITI.E t1110ZO\U CNQINCCruNQ. Y .i Drainage Complaints -From the Files of KCWLRD • • • Jl=t-4, 8 .2001 5:06PM KC lot.RD King County Departmnn of N•taral RNolln* Wmr Md LalMI ._.,_ DMdo• Local Dn••• Strvka Ualt Council Di9t 12 1nitia1t DCD N0.642 P.9/9 (jfl-;..tJ~ "'"" I IIEM .. .,._ - Addnas: l4J12 160111 AVE SE Aulped Dolle 3"""91 Cify RENTON Sca111 WA Zip~ Report Date 4-l-91 Phone: Day ~5-271-!>152 .!'bone: E¥eoina Thomu Bro,. 6'783 STR&E 14-ll·S PacfJJcy# ~ Dia: 3-25-91 '-1 # 145?500123 M•intenanc:e t>tv. 4 Plat N.,.: J called Clll 3.l5-91 to Nt 11J> an IJIPO.,_ ID ilnwtlpaa the complalllt. Pim ,aaeff9d mNdag al 11 ml tblt lJIOnUll&, ) met ,rnb Pam M blr bamo 10 dbcuat lbe concmm lhc 111d the Mlgllbon fllllq In tba yard tor a 11CW nllcr. 1 cxplainad IO Pam 1hat tbe llvea In a Will depwaaa that UI DO drlioep fellum 10 chla 111c -to dlil ICrNt dralaap. TIMI naigtibor Im JIOI. bnlbll ~ codll fbr ~ 111d 1be 1l'llilor bM belD llpied off. I uid that I would MDCI a oopy of• dry well deiall and a COOll'&CtOl1 llst. Filo clONd onsite Pendlna tbe litarmn ir6e «ywell \ \ J t \ I t Drainage Complaints -From the Flies of KCWLRD • • • • • • • • • / (iJ ,!!1t 10,. ~ \o., N ·~ * :) .,. ,, ' ~ ~t . l "'011•; ·--._ ' If -I \~ ..... Jl ' ' ' Location Map ' J3 •.•........ , ,_ ____ ·-s m, 8 0c, --- Maplewood & Orting Hills Subbasin Conditions Cedar River Basin Planning Area Map20 . ~~ !. Stream & Stream Number -Lake/River "'• Stream Mile 5 ~ Wetland & Wetland Number • .. ,. -Subbosin Boundary ~ --Catchment Boundary MWl Catc hment Number ®I ~ CD 11 8 ~ Problem Location/ Area Areawide Nonpoint Water Quality Problem Wetland Habi tat Problem Stream Habitat Pro bl em Ero sion/Sedimenta tion Locally Significant Resource Area Fl ooding 0 East Basin -Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Side Slope: Pond Bottom Length: Pond Bottom Width: Pond Bottom Area: Top Area at 1 ft. FB: Effective Storage Depth: Detention Pond 3.00 H:lV 167.00 ft 58.00 ft 9686. sq. ft 23762. sq. ft 0.546 acres 7. 50 ft 452.00 ft Stage O Elevation: Storage Volume: Riser Head: Riser Diameter: Number of orifices: 115676. cu. ft 2.656 ac-ft 7.50 ft 18.00 inches 3 Pipe Orifice # Height Diameter Full Head Discharge Diameter (in) (ft) 1 0.00 2 5.50 3 5.90 (in) 1.50 2.30 2.80 (CFS) 0.167 0.203 0. 269 6.0 6.0 Top Notch Weir: Outflow Rating Curve: None None Hyd Inflow Outflow 1 3.53 1.10 2 1. 74 0.58 3 2.09 0.50 4 1. 74 0.46 5 1. 84 0.21 6 1. 50 0.11 7 1. 40 0.13 8 1. 09 0.14 Hyd R/D Facility Tributary Outflow Inflow 1 1.10 0.16 2 0.58 0.08 3 0.50 0.09 4 0.46 0.08 5 0.21 0.09 6 0.11 0.08 7 0.13 0.07 8 0.14 0.05 Evendell Plat Preliminary 17R-June 200/ Peak Stage Elev 459.60 459.13 458.65 458.47 457 .·72 455.30 456.41 457 .11 7. 60 7.13 6.65 6. 47 5.72 3.30 4.41 5.11 Reservoir Inflow ******** ******** ******** ******** ******** ******** ******** ******** Storage (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 117770. 2.704 107632. 2.471 97838. 2.246 94092. 2.160 79774. 1.831 39784. 0.913 56865. 1.305 68647. 1.576 POC Outflow Target Cale ******* 1.13 ******* 0. 61 ******* 0.52 ******* 0. 47 ******"" 0.21 ******* 0.18 ******* 0.18 ******* 0 .17 ,1.'•/' West Basin -Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Facility Length: Facility Width: Facility Area: Effective Storage Depth: Stage 0 Elevation: Storage Volume: Riser Head: Riser Diameter: Number of orifices: Orifice # Height (ft) 1 0.00 2 4.75 Top Notch Weir: Length: Weir Height: Outflow Rating Curve: Hyd Inflow Outflow Detention Vault 80.00 25.00 2000. 9.00 470.00 18000. 9.00 12.00 2 Diameter (in) 0.70 1. 30 ft ft sq. ft ft ft cu. ft ft inches Full Head Discharge (CFS) 0.040 0.094 Rectangular 3.00 in 8.90 ft None Pipe Diameter (in), 4.0 Storage Peak Stage 8.96 7.61 6.91 6.00 6.07 3.11 2.40 3.97 Elev 4 78. 96 477.61 476.91 476.00 476.07 473.11 472.40 473.97 (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 1 0.60 0.15 2 0.29 0.11 3 0.30 0.10 4 0.31 0.08 5 0.35 0.09 6 0.26 0.02 7 0.31 0.02 8 0.24 0.03 Hyd R/D Facility Tributary Reservoir Outflow Inflow Inflow 1 0.15 0.09 ******** 2 0.11 a.as ******** 3 0.10 0.05 ******** 4 0.08 0.05 ******** 5 0.09 0.05 ******** 6 0.02 0.05 ******** 7 0.02 0.06 ******** 8 0.03 0.04 ******** Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:devwest.tsf Outflow Time Series File:rdoutw POC Time Series File:pocwest Inflow/Outflow Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: Peak Outflow Discharge: Peak Reservoir Stage: Peak Reservoir Elev: 0.595 0. 14 6 8.96 478.96 CFS CFS Ft Ft 17921. 0.411 15219. 0.349 13815. 0.317 12009. 0.276 12133. 0.279 6214. 0.143 4797. 0.110 7942. 0.182 POC Outflow Target Cale ******* 0. 20 ******* 0.14 ******* 0 .13 ******* 0.11 ******* 0.11 ******* 0. 07 ******* 0. 07 ******* 0. 06 at 6:00 on Jan 9 in at 11:00 on Jan 9 in Peak Reservoir Storage: 17921. Cu-Ft 0.411 Ac-Ft Evendd/ Plat Preliminary TIR-June 200/ • • • • • • • r • • r r r • r r r r r r r ~ r ( C r r r r r r r r r C r Year 8 Year 8 r ~ r .~ ~ ~ • I) • • • KCRTS Command CREATE a new Time Series Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location: Sea-Tac Computing Series exeast.tsf Regional Scale Factor : 1.00 . . , .,,, .! t '~"-. Data Type : Reduced Creating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STTF60R.rnf Till Forest 7. 78 acres Till Pasture Impervious Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STTP60R.rnf 2.74 acres Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STEI60R.rnf 0.09 acres Total Area 10.61 acres Peak Discharge: 0.970 CFS at 9:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Time Series File:exeast.tsf Time Series Computed KCRTS Command Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module Analysis Tools Command Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies Loading Stage/Discharge curve:exeast.tsf Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:exeast.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:exeast.pks Analysis Tools Command Compute Flow DURATION and Exceedence Loading Time Series File:exeast.tsf Computing Interval Locations Computing Flow Durations Durations & Exceedence Probabilities to File:exeast.dur Analysis Tools Command RETURN to Previous Menu KCRTS Command CREATE a new Time Series EvenddJ Plat Preliminary 71R-June 2001 Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location : Sea-Tac Computing Series deveast.tsf Regional Scale Factor : 1.00 Data Type : Reduced Creating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STTG60R.rnf Till Grass 3.82 acres Impervious Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STEI60R.rnf 6.13 acres Total Area 9.95 acres Peak Discharge: 3.70 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Time Series File:deveast.tsf Time Series Computed KCRTS Command Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module Analysis Tools Command Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies Loading Stage/Discharge curve:deveast.tsf Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:deveast.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:deveast.pks Analysis Tools Command Compute Flow DURATION and Exceedence Computing Interval Locations Computing Flow Durations Loading Time Series File:deveast.tsf Durations & Exceedence Probabilities to File:deveast.dur Analysis Tools Command RETURN to Previous Menu KCRTS Command CREATE a new Time Series Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location: Sea-Tac Computing Series byeast.tsf Regional Scale Factor : 1.00 Data Type : Reduced Creating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STTG60R.rnf Till Grass 0.32 acres Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STEI60R.rnf Evenddl Plll1 Preliminary 17R-June 2001 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • (j (j) • • @ @ ~ Gi Ci @ Qi ® @ * i) i) • • • • • Impervious 0.36 acres Total Area 0.68 acres Peak Discharge: 0.238 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Time Series File:byeast.tsf Time Series Computed KCRTS Command Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module Analysis Tools Command Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies Loading Stage/Discharge curve:byeast.tsf Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:byeast.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:byeast.pks Analysis Tools Command Compute Flow DURATION and Exceedence Loading Time Series File:byeast.tsf Computing Interval Locations Computing Flow Durations Durations & Exceedence Probabilities to File:byeast.dur Analysis Tools Command RETURN to Previous Menu KCRTS Command Project Location : CREATE a new Time Series Production of Runoff Time Series Sea-Tac Computing Series Regional Scale Factor : exwest.tsf 1.00 Data Type : Reduced Creating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STTF60R.rnf Till Forest 0.26 acres Till Pasture Impervious Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STTP60R.rnf 1. 80 acres Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STEI60R.rnf 0.12 acres Total Area 2.18 acres Peak Discharge: 0.293 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Eve,u/dl Plat Preliminary TIR-June 2001 Storing Time Series File:exwest.tsf Time Series Computed KCRTS Command Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module Analysis Tools Conunand Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies Loading Stage/Discharge curve:exwest.tsf Flow Frequency Analysis -------------------------------------------------------- Time Series File:exwest.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:exwest.pks Analysis Tools Command Compute Flow DURATION and Exceedence Loading Time Series File:exwest.tsf Computing Interval Locations Computing Flow Durations Durations & Exceedence Probabilities to File:exwest.dur Analysis Tools Command RETURN to Previous Menu KCRTS Command Project Location : CREATE a new Time Series Production of Runoff Time Series Sea-Tac Computing Series Regional Scale Factor : devwest.tsf 1. 00 Data Type : Reduced Creating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STTG60R.rnf Till Grass 0.81 acres Impervious Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STEI60R.rnf 1.19 acres Total Area 2.00 acres Peak Discharge: 0.734 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Evenddl Plat Preliminary 71R-June 2001 Storing Time Series File:devwest.tsf Time Series Computed KCRTS Command Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module Analysis Tools Command Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies (I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • (I • • Qt Gj • ® (t 'i (ii @ ~ @ ® ® 4D • • • ) • • • • Loading Stage/Discharge curve:devwest.tsf Flow Frequency Analysis -------------------------------------------------------- Time Series File:devwest.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:devwest.pks Analysis Tools Cormnand Compute Flow DURATION and Exceedence ------------------------------------ Loading Time Series File:devwest.tsf Computing Interval Locations Computing Flow Durations Durations & Exceedence Probabilities to File:devwest.dur Analysis Tools Cormnand RETURN to Previous Menu KCRTS Cormnand CREATE a new Time Series Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location : Sea-Tac Computing Series bywest.tsf Regional Scale Factor : 1.00 Data Type : Reduced Creating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STEI60R.rnf Impervious 0.16 acres Total Area 0.16 acres Peak Discharge: 0.076 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Time Series File:bywest.tsf Time Series Computed KCRTS Command Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module ------------------------------- Analysis Tools Cormnand Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies ---------------------------------- Loading Stage/Discharge curve:bywest.tsf Flow Frequency Analysis -------------------------------------------------------- Time Series File:bywest.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:bywest.pks Analysis Tools Cormnand Compute Flow DURATION and Exceedence ------------------------------------ Evendell Plat Preliminary 11R-June 2001 Computing Interval Locations Computing Flow Durations Loading Time Series File:bywest.tsf Durations & Exceedence Probabilities to File:bywest.dur Evenddl Plat Preliminary 17R-June 200/ Analysis Tools Command RETURN to Previous Menu KCRTS Command eXit KCRTS Program • • ~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • <it • Qt * ~ Ci (j) 4i ~ @ ~ ~ @ (i 4D • Flow Frequency Analysis Time Seri€s File:exeast.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.645 2 2/09/01 18:00 0.891 1 100.00 0.990 0.200 7 1/05/02 16:00 0. 645 2 25.00 0.960 0. 517 3 2/28/03 3:00 0.517 3 10.00 0.900 0.037 8 3/24/04 19:00 0.508 4 5.00 0.800 0.303 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.457 5 3.00 0.667 0.508 4 1/18/06 20:00 0.303 6 2.00 0.500 0. 457 5 11/24/06 4:00 0.200 7 1.30 0.231 0.891 1 1/09/08 9:00 0.037 8 1.10 0. 091 Computed Peaks 0.809 50.00 0.980 Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:exwest.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0 .138 2 2/09/01 18:00 0.235 1 100.00 0.990 0.059 7 1/05/02 16:00 0.138 2 25.00 0. 960 0.129 3 2/28/03 3:00 0.129 3 10.00 0.900 0.024 8 8/26/04 2:00 0.122 4 5.00 0.800 0.074 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.116 5 3.00 0.667 0.122 4 1/18/06 16:00 0.074 6 2.00 0.500 0.116 5 11/24/06 4:00 o. 059 7 1.30 0.231 0.235 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.024 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.202 50.00 0.980 • • Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:deveast.tsf • Project Location:Sea-Tac • ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 1. 74 6 2/09/01 2:00 3.53 1 100.00 0.990 1. 40 8 1/05/02 16:00 2.17 2 25.00 0.960 2.09 3 2/27/03 7:00 2.09 3 10.00 0.900 1. 50 7 8/26/04 2:00 1. 84 4 5.00 0.800 1. 80 5 10/28/04 16:00 1.80 5 3.00 0. 667 1. 84 4 1/18/06 16:00 1. 74 6 2.00 0.500 2.17 2 10/26/06 0:00 1. 50 7 1. 30 .o. 231 3.53 1 1/09/08 6:00 1. 40 8 1.10 '·b. 091 Computed Peaks 3.08 50.00 0.980 Evende/1 Plat Preliminary 17R-Jwie 2001 Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:devwest.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0. 294 6 2/09/01 2:00 0.240 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.354 3 2/27/03 7:00 0. 260 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.313 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.312 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.378 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.595 1 1/09/08 6:00 Computed Peaks Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:byeast.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.080 7 2/09/01 2:00 0.070 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.098 3 12/08/02 18:00 0.082 6 8/26/04 2:00 0. 097 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.085 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.120 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.156 1 1/09/08 6:00 Computed Peaks Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:bywest.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.046 7 2/09/01 2:00 0.040 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.056 3 12/08/02 18:00 0.047 6 8/26/04 2:00 0.056 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.049 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.069 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.090 1 1/09/08 6:00 Computed Peaks Evendell Plat Preliminary 11R-June 20()/ -----Flow Frequency Analysis--------Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.595 1 100.00 0.990 0.378 2 25.00 o. 960 0.354 3 10.00 0.900 0.313 4 5.00 0.800 0.312 5 3.00 0.667 0. 294 6 2.00 0.500 0.260 7 1.30 0.231 0.240 8 1.10 0.091 0.523 50.00 0.980 -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.156 1 100.00 0.990 0.120 2 25.00 0.960 0. 098 3 10.00 0.900 0. 097 4 5.00 0.800 0.085 5 3.00 0. 667 0.082 6 2.00 0.500 0.080 7 1. 30 0.231 0.070 8 1. 10 o. 091 0.144 SO.OD 0.980 -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0. 090 1 100.00 0.990 0.069 2 25.00 0.960 0.056 3 10.00 0.900 0.056 4 5.00 0.800 0.049 5 3.00 0.667 0.047 6 2.00 0.500 0.046 7 1. 30 0.231 0.040 8 1.10 0.091 0.083 SO.OD 0.980 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • <it (:j <i ~ (j) Ci ~ @ @ 6, ~ ® @ ~ fiD • • ) • • Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:poceast.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0. 611 2 2/09/01 19:00 0.177 7 1/05/02 16:00 0.517 3 3/06/03 20:00 0.182 6 8/26/04 2:00 0.173 8 1/05/05 8:00 0.214 5 1/19/06 2:00 0. 472 4 11/24/06 6:00 1.13 1 1/09/08 11:00 Computed Peaks Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:pocwest.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.140 2 2/09/01 18:00 0.059 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.110 4 3/06/03 19:00 0. 067 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.068 6 10/28/04 16:00 0.107 5 1/18/06 20:00 0.135 3 11/24/06 4:00 0.197 1 1/09/08 9:00 Computed Peaks Evenddl Plat Preliminary T1R-June 2001 -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 1.13 1 100.00 0.990 0. 611 2 25.00 0.960 0.517 3 10.00 0.900 0. 472 4 5.00 0.800 0.214 5 3.00 0. 667 0.182 6 2.00 0.500 0.177 7 1. 30 0.231 0.173 8 1.10 0.091 0.955 50.00 0.980 -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0 .197 1 100.00 0.990 0.140 2 25.00 0.960 0.135 3 10.00 0.900 0.110 4 5.00 0.800 0.107 5 3.00 0.667 0.068 6 2.00 0.500 0.067 7 1. 30 0.231 0.059 8 1.10 0. 091 0.178 50.00 0.980 • • • • •• -• ·•o_<j,·---.,->•• u•• ,• •·w ,"'•••>•C• ,• -••• CV-.._-"'' •,••• .. -. • , , -~ !'"' . ..._,,-~ ,, •-•.--,-~,.."~•~" ~,..,,: >'-•'-"'-'-''"<,.,; •,•~'i'" •• :. : : : .. ,\ .. Appe11!~ D. _ Hy1b:ologk Model Documentation ·, :-; , ··:·-...~:·-· -It.·,-·.: ·''.~,·:.' u ·t;,. .tt. ·"" The following is a description of KCRTS input and output files used in designing the R/D facilities and conducting the downstream drainage analysis for the Evendell Plat. EXECUTABLE FILES basins.exc: This executable file creates time series for all contributing areas to the downstream system. tar.exc: This executable creates target duration files for R/D design. TIME SERIES FILES R/D Design exeast.tsf: The site's easterly basin under existing conditions. Includes area of proposed road improvements along SE 136'h Street. exwest.tsf: The site's westerly basin under existing conditions. Includes area of proposed road improvements along SE 136'h Street. byeast.tsf: The portion of proposed road improvements along SE 136th Street in easterly basin that bypasses the stormwater facility. bywest.tsf: The portion of proposed road improvements along SE 136th Street in westerly basin that bypasses the stormwater facility. deveast.tsf: The site's easterly basin under proposed developed conditions. Includes area of proposed road improvements along SE 136'h Street . devwest.tsf: The site's westerly basin under proposed developed conditions. Includes area of proposed road improvements along SE 136th Street. poceast.tsf: the the Time series for developed conditions at the site's easterly downstream point-of-compliance. pocwest.tsf: Time series for developed conditions at the site's westerly downstream point-of-compliance. Evendell PlaJ Preliminary nR-June 2001 tare.tsf: Target duration curve for the proposed R/D system for the site's easterly basin. Based on the following times series: exeast.tsf. tarw.tsf: Target duration curve for the proposed R/D system for the site's westerly basin. Based on the following times series: exwest.tsf. RESERVOIRS rdeas. rdf: The Evendell Plat R/D facility managing stormwater from the easterly basin of the developed site, including an offsite road improvements. rdwes.rdf: The Evendell Plat R/D facility managing stormwater from the westerly basin of the developed site, including an offsite road improvements. GENERAL NOTES 1. Seatac regional rainfall runoff files with a scale factor of 1.0 were used in the hydrologic simulations. 2. R/D facilities were designed with the 8-year data set. 1-hour peak flow rates were used for detention calculations. 3. 15-minute peak flow rates were used for conveyance calculations. 4. Gravel areas were modeled in KCRTS by assuming that 50 percent of the area is impervious and the remaining 50 percent are the same· cover type as that surrounding the gravel area. Evenddl Plat Preliminary TIR-.hme 2001 • • • • • • <I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ~ * (j @ (i " @ (l) ~ @ @ @ • i} ~ • I I I I' I I I I ,. t I I I a I I I I I Traffic Impact Analysis Evende/1 -~~---'---------------------------= TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... I PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................ I EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................................ I Roadways ................................................................................................................................................... 5 SE l 28ili Street ........................................................................................................................................ 5 148ili Avenue SE ..................................................................................................................................... 5 SE l 36ili Street ........................................................................................................................................ 6 156ili Avenue SE ..................................................................................................................................... 6 158ili Avenue SE ..................................................................................................................................... 6 160ili Avenue SE ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Transit/Non-Motorized Facilities ............................................................................................................... 6 Transit... .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Non-Motorized Facilities ........................................................................................................................ 7 Traffic Volumes .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Level of Service .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Definition ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Accidents .................................................................................................................................................... 9 Planned and Programmed Improvements ................................................................................................... 9 FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT ........................................................................................ IO Background Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................................... IO Pipeline Projects ................................................................................................................................... I 0 Historical Growth ................................................................................................................................. 11 Level of Service ........................................................................................................................................ 11 FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT ................................................................................................ 13 Traffic Volumes ........................................................................................................................................ 13 Project Trip Generation ........................................................................................................................ 13 Trip Distributionffraffic Assignment ....................................................................................................... 14 Level of Service ........................................................................................................................................ 14 Tum Lane Analysis .................. : ............................................................................................................... 19 CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................................................................... 20 TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION ............................................................................................................. 21 Garry Struthers Associates, Inc. I I I I I' ,I I I I I I I' I I j I 1· I I Traffic Impact Analysis Evende/1 INTRODUCTION The following report was prepared to address the traffic impact analysis guidelines of King County for the Preliminary Plat ofEvendell located on the south side of SE 136th Street between 156th Avenue SE and 160th Avenue SE in the Renton area of King County. A vicinity map is presented in Figure I. This report summarizes the process, findings, conclusions and recommendations of the traffic analysis. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Evendell is a 13.01-acre property consisting of two adjoining parcels. One parcel is 11.4 acres and the smaller parcel is 1.61 acres. The zoning is R-4, which allows 4 units per acre. Two alternative development concepts are being considered for the property. Under one alternative, the plat will only include the larger 11.4-acre parcel, developed to 44 lgts under the current R-4 zoning. Under the second alternative, a rezone application would be submitted requesting re- designation to R-6 density (six units per acre). Under the R-6 alternative, both parcels would be included in the plat for a total of 75 lots. Both alternatives are being submitted to the County for concurrent review and are included in this Traffic Impact Analysis. Under th<:,R-4 alternative,J!_ccess to the plat will be via 160th Avenue SE, negating the need to improve SE 136th Street from 156th Avenue SE to 160th Avenue SE. Under the R-6 alternative, SE 136th Street will be improved to urban neighborhood collector standards.from 156th Avenue SE to I SRth Avenue SE although a sidewalk is not proposed for the north side. From 158th A ven E SE 136th Street will be develo ed There is an existing single-family dwelling unit on the 11.4-acre parcel that will remain under both alternatives. The plat is expected to be fully occupied by 2004, which for the purposes of -this analysis is assumed to be the horizon year. Preliminary site plans for both the R-4 and R-6 alternatives are presented in Figures 2A and 2B. EXISTING CONDITIONS The Existing Conditions analysis provides a statement of the traffic-related conditions within the study area at the time of the writing of this report. The statement includes a discussion of the existing roadway, transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities serving the site; identification of existing peak hour traffic volumes and accident history at the analysis intersections; and identification of proposed transportation improvements in this area. Garry Struthers Associates, Inc. Page I 1~------------------i I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'i I uJ (/) ~ j:!: S 136TH ST ~ uJ (/) ... SE 128TH ST ~ l;j ... ·S SITE~ ~ IO ... ST •~------,------~---~ GARRY STRUTHERS AssoclATES, INC. I, 31110--.a..1ao ...._,WA~ Phllrm:{4211)11ll-0300 a-~ft2S)ll19-0IDO _,, hll;p:/krr ,0.- VICINITY MAP EVENDELl FIGURE 1 ,L_ ___ ..l__ ___ ______:_::::::.:.:.:....:.. ___ __., I I I i I I I I I I •• I I I I ·~. i I _I I SCAU:: 1· .. 100' 100 100 200 R-4 - .. ~ . : I-"' I 'i_' i . • ~. ·ic.:+ 'j.·· ,. • I -~,-., ,._ ·i I 11---~--,-------,------~ I SITE PLAN R-4 ZONING EVENDEll FIGURE 2A ,L_ ___ ___i_ _____ ---L----~ I I I I I I I I I 1· I; I I I I ' ' "" "' I 7\~ _ _k_ ·" J<' I ' I I I L._ "°I I , •. I •· I I I ~ ' _1 ... I 'a, .• I :§ I 1~--~----~--- 1 GARRY==--=-~ .. "'"· INC. s IT E p LAN ';;ii:: R-6 ZONING a-: a .-- --FIGURE 28 ,~ __ _l_ ___ --.:...::::::::....::..i_ __ ~ EVENDELL I I I I I I f I I I I I I I I I I Traffic Impact Analysis Evende/1 King County Ordinance #11617 requires a traffic analysis of the project impact at all intersections. which receive 20 percent and 30 peak hour project generated trips. Based on the transportation 'concurrency model distribution for this site, the following intersections are impacted by the project: ' R-4 Alternative » SE !28th Street/160th Avenue SE » Site Access/160th Avenue SE R-6 Alternative » SE 128'h Street/148th Avenue SE » SE !28th Street/156th Avenue SE » SE 136'h Street/J 56th Avenue SE » SE 136th Street/158th Avenue SE Although the intersections of 144'h Avenue SE/SE 128'h Street and 138th Avenue SE/SE !28th Street meet this criteria, these intersections are under the jurisdiction of the City of Renton and therefore were not analyzed as part of this study. Roadways The roadways directly impacted by the proposed development include SE 128th Street, 148th Avenue SE, 156'h Avenue SE, SE 136'h Street, 158th Avenue SE, and 160th Avenue SE. These roadways are discussed in the following section. SE 128'• Street SE !28th Street is a 4-lane principal arterial, which runs from 148th Avenue SE to 160th Avenue SE in the vicinity of the site. There is a westbound left-tum lane at 156th Avenue SE and an eastbound left tum lane at 148th A venue SE. The roadway width is approximately 60 feet. There is curb, gutter and sidewalk at the intersection with 156th Avenue SE and asphalt-paved shoulders at the intersection with 148th Avenue SE. Traffic control includes a stop sign at 148th Avenue SE and a signal at J 56'h A venue SE. The posted speed limit is 3 5 mph west of 156th A venue SE and 45 mph east of 1561h Avenue SE. 148°' Avenue SE 148th Avenue SE is a 2-lane collector arterial that runs north south from SE !28th Street to May Valley Road in the vicinity of the site. There are paved shoulders at the intersection with SE !28th Street. Traffic control includes a stop sign SE !28th Street. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. Garry Struthers Associates, Inc. Page5 I I I I I I I ,, I I I I I t ., I I I Traffic Impact Analysis Evende/1 SE 136'h Street SE 136'h Street is a 20-foot wide gravel road from 152nd Avenue SE to 156th Avenue SE. King County maintains the roadway near the intersectio · th e SE. The remainder of the oadway tot e west is a pnvate street. 136 Street is a aved road from 160th Avenue SE to 162nd Avenue top signs on SE l 36'h Street provide the traffic control at the mtersection with 156th Avenue SE and 160'h Avenue SE. 156'h Avenue SE 156'h Avenue SE is 1Lminor arterial that runs north/south from SE 128'h Street to SE 142nd Street in the v1c1mty of the site and has one lane in each direction. The pavement width is approximately 24 feet with paved shoulders on the both sides of the roadway. Traffic control includes a stop sign at SE 136th Street and a signal at SE 128'h Street. The posted speed is 35 mph. 158'h Avenue SE J 58th Avenue SE is a two-lane neighborhood collector that runs north and south from SE ] 28th .Street and dead ends at approximate]y SE ) 3§.th Street. The roadway width is approximatelY. 24 feet with ittle to no dirt shoulde · es of the roadway. Traffic control includes a stop sign at SE 128 treet. The p.osted speed limit is 25 mph. ]6(/h Avenue SE 160th Avenue SE is a two-lane neighborhood collectpr that runs north and south from SE 125th Street to SE 144th Street in the vicinity of the site. The roadway width js apprgxjmate))c 24 feet • with )mje to no dirt shouldi;.!] on the west side and a paved shoulder on the east side of the roadway. Traffic control includes a stop sign at SE 128th Street. The posted speed limjt is 25 mph. Transit/Non-Motorized Facilities Transit King County Metro provides transit service in the vicinity of the site. Routes 111 and 114 provide service along SE 128th Street, SE 144th Street and 144th Avenue SE. There are two bus stops located near the proposed plat. One is located on the southeast corner of SE l 28'h Street/156th Avenue SE and the second is located on the southeast corner of SE !28th Street/160th Avenue SE. During the week, service for Route 111 runs from 5:15 AM to 7:35 AM from 4:15 PM to 6:45 PM with approximate 30-minute headways. Service for Route 114 runs from 6:45 AM to 9:00 AM and from 5:00 PM to 6:30 PM with approximate 30-minute headways. In addition, there is Renton Dial-a-Ride Transit (DART) service along SE 128th Street, Lake Kathleen Drive, SE 144'h Street, and 156th Avenue SE Monday through Friday. Garry Struthers Associates, Inc. Page6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I : I I I I Traffic Impact Analysis Evende/1 Non-Motorized Facilities There are currently no non-motorized facilities in the vicinity of the plat. Traffic Volumes Existing PM peak hour traffic volumes at the analysis intersections were determined from turning movement counts collected between June 11-22, 2001. The existing PM peak hour volumes are presented in Figure 3. Level of Service Definition Level of service (LOS) is used to qualify the degree of traffic congestion and driver comfort on streets or at intersections. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) describes the methodologies for calculating LOS on street segments and at signalized and unsignalized intersections. According to the 2000 HCM (TRB Special Report #209), there are six levels of service by which the operational performance of the roadway system may be described. These levels of service range from LOS A, which indicates a relatively free-flowing condition, to LOS F that indicates operational breakdown. Th level of service for a two-wa stop controlled TWSC intersection is determined by the computed or measured control dela an 1s defined for each minor movement. Level of service is not defined for the intersection as a w o e. Average contro e ay ess an or equal to I 0 seconds per vehicle is defined as LOS A. For LOS F, the average control delay is greater than 50 seconds per vehicle. ' The LOS for signalized intersections is defined in terms of average control delay per vehicle. The criterion for LOS A is an average control delay of less than or equal to IO seconds per vehicle. The criterion for LOS F is an average control delay of greater than 80 seconds. King County has adopted a,,level of service E as the county road capacity standard. According to Ordinance # 11617 J!llY development that impacts an intersection with 20 percent of the peak hour project generated trips and 19 project generated peak hour trips qrnst provide a level of service E with full development of the proJect. If the level of service is below LOS E for the without project condition, the developer is responsible to maintain the existing level of service. For the R-4 alternative, the SE 128th Street/160th Avenue SE and the site access/160'h Avenue SE intersections meet the criteria for an impacted intersection. For the R-6 alternative, the SE 128'h Street/148th Avenue SE, SE 128th/156th Avenue SE, and SE 136th Street/156th Avenue SE intersections meet the criteria. Level of service for the signalized intersection was calculated using Synchro™ and the McTrans version of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, HCS-2000 was used for the unsignalized intersections. The results of the existing condition level of service analysis for the R-4 and R-6 alternatives are shown in Table I. Garry Struthers Associates, Inc. Page? I,----------------~ I I I I I I I I I I I I a I I " "' "' "' j l 65 _) 1164- L" w -604 "' :;; '" "' ! SE 128TH ST 670 - 415 ! JI 0 _) 1 t 1 -.... ~ I ON -549 ,336 1 r N "' N ~ N Q:i FIRE STATION SE 137TH PL w "' "' -" Ls Jll -736 ,,s 7 _) 1·t 1 755 - 56 " N ' NON 11---No_T_T_o_s_c_AL_E ___ --,--------------r----/------,~---l I • GARRY STRUTHERS As80CIATES. INC. s,so---.-,oo ......... WA- ..,_,(42111)111- FP:(•'2$)1119"030III ~=1 01 "'-"""" ,.,..-.--.- 2001 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES EVENDELL ~-------'---------'--------' I FIGURE 3 I I I I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I Traffic Impact Analysis Table 1 2001 Existing Level of Service Intersection R-4 Alternative SE !28th Street/160lh Ave SE NBLT 1 R-6 Alternative SE 128 1' Street/148lh Ave SE SBLT 1 SE 136th Street/156lh Ave SE EBLT 1 SE 1281 ' Street/156lh Ave SE Overall (xx) -seconds of delay per vehicle. Traffic Control Two-Way Stop One-Way Stop One-Way Stop Signal 200 I Existing D (28.7) F (50.9) B (13.4) B (16.3) SBL T -southbound left, NBL T -northbound left, EBL T -eastbound left. Evende/1 LOS Standard E E E E I, -for the unsignalized intersections, the movement with the highest delay is shown. All other movements operate at LOS A or B. As shown in Table 1, all analysis intersections operate at an acceptable level of service except for the SE 128th Street/148th Avenue SE intersection. This intersection operates at a LOS F with a vehicle delay of 50.9 seconds. Accidents The latest three-year accident history data at the analysis intersections were obtained from King County. The latest three-year accident history included the period from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 1999. A summary of the three-year accident history is presented in Table 2. Table 2 Three-Year Accident History Intersection SE 128m St/148m Ave SE SE 128 1' St/156lh Ave SE SE 136\h St/156lh Ave SE SE I 28th St/ 160th Ave SE I )-Accident rate per million entering vehicles No. of Accidents 1997 1998 0 2 4 4 0 0 3 5 1999 0 4 0 5 2) -Average accident rate for type of intersection per WSDOT Acc. Avg. Rate' Rate 1 0.11 0.90 0.49 0.90 0.00 1.30 0.66"-0.90 ' As shown in Table 2, the accident rates for all analysis intersections are below the state average for similar intersections. " Planned and Programmed Improvements , A review of King County's Planned and Programmed Transportation Improvements indicate the following transportation improvement projects planned in the study area. Garry Struthers Associates, Inc. Page9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Traffic Impact Analysis Evende/1 o 149th Avenue SE (Maple Valley Highway to Elliot Bridge) CIP #400588. North of Jones Road -Construct three-lane approach with a left-tum lane, two through lanes. South of Jones Road -Construct a three-lane approach road with one 12-foot center turn lane, two through lanes with curb, gutter, and sidewalks. This project is related to CIP #401288. Presently the County is conducting further environmental studies and preparing a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. o 1541h Place SE/SE 142nd Place (SE Jones Road to 156th Avenue SE) King County Roads. Realign roadway, widen roadway, pave shoulders, and construct bike lane on shoulder. o 156th Avenue SE (SE 142nd Place to SE 1281h Street) King County Roads. Pave shoulders. o Jones Road (149th A venue SE to SR 169) Private. Pave shoulders. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT The Future Conditions without Project analysis provides a discussion of the traffic-related conditions in the horizon year without the proposed project. This section includes a discussion of background traffic volumes and level of service at the analysis intersections in the horizon year. Evendell is expected to be fully occupied by 2004, market permitting. Therefore, 2004 for the purposes of this analysis is considered to be the horizon year. Background Traffic Volumes Background traffic volumes for the 2004 without project condition include the 2001 existing PM peak hour traffic volumes, PM peak hour traffic generated by known pipeline projects in the vicinity of the site, and area-wide traffic growth. Pipeline Projects Pipeline projects are defined as proposed development, which is expected to be fully developed and impact the transportation system within the horizon year of Evendell. King County and the City of Renton identified the following proposed projects in the general vicinity ofEvendell. Trip generation for the proposed projects is presented in Table 3. Garry Struthers Associates, inc. Page IO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Traffic Impact Analysis Evendel/ Table 3 Pipeline Projects PM Peak Location Land Use Total In Out King County ,' '' ' ' '' ',,, ' ' 13615 154ili Ave SE 59 sfdu's 60 38 22 13305 160'h Ave SE 22 sfdu's 22 14 8 l39XX 162nd Ave SE 5 sfdu's 5 3 2 SE 138" Pl/196" Ave SE l sfdu 1 I 0 14243 183rd Ave SE 2 sfdu's 2 I 1 SE 128" St/164" Ave SE 4 sfdu's 4 3 City of Renton 5001 SE 128'h Street 8 sfdu's 8 5 3 N. & S. side of SE 128" St 45 sfdu's 45 29 16 14606 SE 136" St 21 sfdu's 21 13 8 5715 SE 128" St 7 sfdu's 7 4 3 5710 SE 128" St 7 sfdu's 7 4 3 5800 SE 128" St 8 sfdu's 8 5 3 S. of SE 128" St, btwn 148ili Ave & 152nd Ave 218 sfdu's 218 140 78 618 SE 128" St 124 sfdu's 125 80 45 Total 533 341 192 As shown in Table 3, the pipeline projects are expected to generate approximately 533 PM peak hour trips. Trip distribution/traffic assignments for the pipeline projects were determined based upon King County's Transportation Concurrency model run. Historical Growth Existing 200 I PM peak hour volumes were factored by 1.03 to represent the historical growth portion of the background traffic. The 1.03 factor is based on a 1.0 percent per year growth rate in the vicinity of the site provided by the County. A summary of the background traffic volumes is presented in Figure 4. Level of Service The 2004 background without project PM peak hour level of service at the analysis intersections is presented in Table 4. The existing level of service is shown for comparison purposes. Garry Struthers Associates, Inc. Page 11 1.----------------- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ~ <O -<O Jll L,s -641 w "' 19 I;; " <O ;! SE 128TH ST 720 - 461 ! JI 11_)1! 24--... ro~ l NN -601 ,,so l r ~ ., N " cs FlRE STATION fT3STHsrr-- ' I I I L __ ~E 1JBTH PL I --:____;, I :1 wl "'I "'I ~I ~I :;J I ;e I :;JI .1;1 -. -1 I I I I I I I <O -., L5 -783 Jll ,,a 7 _) 111 794 - 73 ., ., ' "ON SE 137TH PL I NOT TO SCALE XX -PM PEAK ·1----------.--------,-------; I ~ GARRY 8TRUTHERSAll80CIATES, INC. 31&0 AloMtm -· -100 -,WA....-""°""' ('20) 11IMl300 Fp:("25)1111MJ31111 --~----"""' 2004 W/OUT PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES EVENDELL ! I ~---------~----------F-IG_UR_E_4 __________ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Traffic Impact Analysis Evende/1 Table 4 2004 Without Project Level of Service 2001 2004 Intersection Traffic Control Existine Without Proiect LOS Standard R-4 Alternative SE 128"' Street/160"' Ave SE E NBLT' Two-Way Stop D (28.7) E (39.7) R-6 Alternative SE 128"' Street/148"' Ave SE SBLT' One-Way Stop F (50.9) E Overall Signal' A (8.8)' SE 136" Street/156" Ave SE EBLT' One-Way Stop B (13.4) C (17.2) E SE 128"' Street/156"' Ave SE Overall Signal B (16.3) 8(19.1) E (xx) -seconds of delay per vehicle. SBL T -southbound left, NBL T -northbound left, EBL T -eastbound left. I -for the unsignalized intersections, the movement with the highest delay is shown. All other movements operate at LOS A orB. 2 -a traffic signal, a south leg and eastbound/westbound left turn lanes will be constructed at this intersection as part the Maplewood development. As shown in Table 4, all analysis intersections will operate at an acceptable level of service in 2004 without the project. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT The Future Conditions with Project analysis provides a statement of what traffic related conditions will be like in the horizon year with the project. The analysis simply adds anticipated project impacts to the horizon year background conditions. The analysis defines anticipated project trip generation and evaluates impact through a level of service analysis at each of the analysis intersections. Traffic Volumes Traffic volumes for 2004 with project condition include 2004 without project volumes discussed above plus expected traffic to be generated by Evendell. Project Trip Generation Trip generation for Evendell was calculated using the trip generation rates for Single-Family Dwelling Units, Land Use Code 210 presented in the Sixth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Report, 1997. A summary of the anticipated trip generation for both the R-4 and R-6 zoning alternatives for Evendell is presented in Table 5. Garry Struthers Associates, Inc. Page 13 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Traffic Impact Analysis Evende/1 Table 5 Trip Generation ' AM Peak . PM Peak Land Use AWDT Total In Out Total In Out R-4 Alternative Proposed -44 sfdu's 421 33 8 25 44 28 16 Existing -I sfdu IO I 0 I I I 0 -24 --Net Impact 411 32 8 43 27 16 R-6 Alternative Proposed -7 5 sfdu' s 718 56 14 42 76 49 27 Existing -I sfdu 10 I 0 I I I 0 Net Impact 708 55 14 41 75 48 27 As shown in Table 5, the R-4 alternative for Evendell is estimated to generate 421 daily, 33 AM peak hour and 44 PM peak hour trips in the 2004 horizon year. The net traffic impact of the project was determined by deducting the existing site trip generation from trip generation expected with the proposed development. The net traffic impact is 411 daily vehicle trips, 32 AM peak and 43 PM peak hour trips. The R-6 alternative is estimated to generate 718 daily, 56 AM peak hour and 76 PM peak hour trips in the 2004 horizon year. The net traffic impact determined by deducting the existing single-family dwelling unit is 708 daily vehicle trips, 55 AM peak and 75 PM peak hour-trips. Trip Distributionffraffic Assignment Trip distribution percentages for Evendell were based on the traffic assignment provided by King County Transportation Planning as part of the Transportation Concurrency Analysis. Trip distribution percentages for the pipeline projects were derived from the percentages determined for the Evendell analysis. The results of the trip distribution/traffic assignment process for project-generated trips are presented in Figures SA and SB for the R-4 and R-6 alternatives, respectively. A summary of the 2004 with project PM peak hour volumes are presented in Figures 6A and 6B for the R-4 and R-6 alternatives, respectively. Level of Service The 2004 with project PM peak hour level of service at the signalized intersection are shown in Table 6. The existing condition and 2004 without project PM peak hour level of service are provided for comparison. Garry Struthers Associates, Inc. Page 14 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -L -6 15 - 6 SE 128TH ST - 15 -6 16 - 6 16 f "i5rnisrr-- l I 16 - w V> ~ ;, a, !!' I I ~-'- 1J_am __ PL----~I ~--1 I :, I SE 137TH PL "' I t:! I ~ I ~ I ff I iE I :;jj vi -, !!' I I I I I I I I PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES R-4 ALTERNATIVE -6 ,1 1 r 16 l w n 6 7 ---16 -J "' 23 I t 9 N j 9 _) 1 7 ' v I t R-4 ALTERNATIVE 7 I 4 44 LOTS PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS TOTAL: 43 IN: 27 OUT: 16 XX -PM PEAK EVENDELL I ~----------'-----------__:_Fl::.GU::.:R::E....:5:::.:Ai_ ________ __J 'r----------------- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -L 28 - -10 10 SE 128TH ST - 28 "' VI In iE .. : SE lJIJTH PL -2 21 -l 8 ' .. 10 -29 .. r w f i3riTHsrr-- I I I I I ~-- I I 8 l ~ "'I "' VI I VI ~, ~, ~ ~ I i!: I iE ~ I ::q w -, -, :':' I I I I I I I t l ," 21 ' N r w ;: 11 j j 6 J • _) 1 +r---r.*°bh-""7"~,ff,+---~J I N SE 137TH P ---- t• ;;. J I t 2 R-6 ALTERNATIVE 75 LOTS ~ PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS TOTAL: 75 IN: 48 OUT: 27 1 13 11r 1-------1-'----' § w 14 ' w -"°' 11---NO_T_T_o_s_c_AL_E ___ ---r-------------~---x_x_-_PM_P_EA_K _ __J I ~ GARRY==-.. ~~TES.INC PROJECT-GENERATED -=:.~,=' TRAFFIC VOLUMES Fa: (4211)1119-4308 -:;;:..':.---.: R-6 ALTERNATIVE EVENDELL I '------------'-----------~Fl..:.GU:.:.R:=E....:5::Bi__ ________ __J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' <O <O -<O Jll L35 -647 "' 19 "' :;; :r ~ "' ;': SE 128TH ST SE 1J8TH PL -607 ,350 736 -l r 461 l "' ;:; .. N 0 Q;i <O" FlRE n,o STATION JI '" "' 11 _J lt ~ iE 2•, n "' "'"' ~ NN fT3BTHsrr-- I I I I I ~------ I I :, , "' I "' '" ~, ;1 "' < <I ~ ~ I iE I :;if :1;f ~ ~ -, -, I I I I I I I <O_ .. Ls -783 Jll ,•s 7 _) lt1 794 - 89 ' ~o~ JI 9 _) lt "' 7 "' "' ' .. .,, ~ iE 0 ~ I r-----N_o_r_rn_s_cA_LE-----.------------~----xx_-_P_M_P_EA_K _ __J I • -~="!..,-,:':-:.,TEa.1NC 2004 WITH PROJECT ":,:-:,=' TRAFFIC VOLUMES Fu: f,Q5)619"030lll •.;..:-...= R-4 ALTERNATIVE EVENDELL I ~----.------'-----------...:..F:.::.IG:.:UR.:.:E_:6::..:Ai__ ________ _J lr------------------- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' <D <D -<D JIL L35 -soJ -651 w ,350 19 V> I;; l ( ~ 741 - 469 I " ;; ;! "' N SE 128TH ST ~~co La FIR~ -o STATION JI L,• 61 .::: l t ( 24--.. IX)~ ' NNU) f"'i3STHsrr-- l I I I L __ ..:_E 1387H PL I ---.::..._~ii I .:, I "' I m I m ~I ~I ~ ~ I iE I t;ll vi ~ -, :!!I "' I I I I I I I oNo Lo Ls -o <D-v JI L 13 Jll -78.3 y49 .:::lt( 0 7 _) lt( 0 794 -14 ' <D 73 v 0 -NO, ' "0" SE 137TH PL 1,--N_o_r_r_o_s_cA-LE-----r---------------.----xx_-_P_M_P_EA_K _ _J I • GAARY~=-RS~~TES,INC 2004 WITH PROJECT -=.~,=' TRAFFIC VOLUMES Fa:1425)61--=--= R-6 ALTERNATIVE EVENDEll I ~----------'-----------F...:..IG.:...UR.:::E....:6:.:B.!__ ________ _J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,\ Traffic Impact Analysis Evende/1 Table 6 2004 With Project Level of Service 2001 0 2004 2004 LOS Intersection Traffic Control Existine Without Project With Project Standard R-4 Alternative Site Access/160" Ave SE EBLT1 One-Way Stop . A (9.4) E SE 128" Street/160" Ave SE 8 G47.SJ NBLT1 Two-Way Stop D (28.7) E R-6 Alternative SE 136th Street/158" Ave SE WBLT' Two-Way Stop A (9.0) E SE 128' Street/148" Ave SE SBLT 1 One-Way Stop F (50.9) E Overall Signal' A (8.8) 1 A (8.9) 1 SE 136" Street/156" Ave SE EBLT' · One-Way Stop B (13.4) C (17.2) E Two-Way Stop' C (19.1) SE 128" Street/156" Ave SE Overall Signal B (16.3) 8(19.1) B (19.2) E (xx) -seconds of delay per vehicle. SBL T -southbound left, NBLT -northbound left, EBL T -eastbound left. 1 -for the unsignalized intersections, the movement with the highest delay is shown. All other movements operate at LOS A or B. 2 -a traffic signal, a south leg and eastbound/westbound left turn lanes will be constructed at this intersection as part the Maplewood development. 3 -with the R-6 alternative, SE 136th Street will be developed west to 156th Avenue SE, creating a two- way stop controlled intersection. As shown in Table 6, the analysis intersections will operate at an acceptable level of service in 2004 with the project. Turn Lane Analysis A tum Jane warrant analysis was conducted at the SE 136th Street/156th Avenue SE, SE 136th Street/I58th Avenue SE, and the Site Access/I60th Avenue SE intersections. Under the R-6 alternative, the plat access road will align with 158th Avenue SE. The warrant analysis determined that niether a northbound left-tum nor a southbound right-tum Jane is warranted at the SE 136th Street/158'h Avenue intersection. In addition, under the R-6 alternative, SE 136th Street will be developed west to 156th Avenue SE, thus creating an east leg at this intersection. The warrant analysis determined niether a southbound left-tum nor a northbound right-tum Jane is warranted at the SE 136th Street/l 56th Avenue intersection. Under the R-4 alternative, access to the site will be via a plat entry road to 160th A venue SE, south of SE 136th Street. The warrant analysis determined that neither a northbound left-tum or a southbound right-tum Jane is warranted at this intersection. Garry Struthers Associates, Inc. Page 19 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Traffic Impact Analysis Pedestrian Facilities To/From Schools Briarwood Elementary School Evende/1 Briarwood Elementary School is located on, SE 134th Street, east of 168th Avenue SE. The pedestrian route to this school from Evendell would likely be via north on 160th Avenue SE, east on SE 128'" Street, south on l 68 1h A venue SE, and east on SE 134 th Street, which is approximately 1-1/4 miles. Pedestrian facilities on 160 Avenue SE north of SE 136th Street include a paved shoulder on the east side of the roadway. On SE 128'h Street pedestrian facilities include a paved shoulder on the south side of the road. Paved shoulders are provided on the east side of 168th A venue SE and on the north side of SE 134th Street. Maywood Middle School Maywood Middle School is located on 168th Avenue SE south of SE 144th Street. The pedestrian route to this school from Evendell would likely be via south on ! 60'h Avenue SE, east on SE 144'" Street, and south on 168th Avenue SE, which is approximately I mile. Pedestrian facilities on 160'" Avenue SE, south of SE 136th Street, include little to no shoulder on the either side of the roadway. On SE 144th Street, pedestrian facilities include a paved shoulder on both sides of the road. A sidewalk is provided on the east side of 168th A venue SE. Liberty High School Liberty High School is located on 168th Avenue SE south of SE 136th Street. The pedestrian route to this school from Evendell would likely be via north on 160th Avenue SE, east on SE l 28'h Street, and south on 168th A venue SE, which is approximately 1-1/2 miles. Pedestrian facilities on 160 1h Avenue SE, north of SE 136th Street, include a paved shoulder on the east side of the roadway. On SE I 28th Street pedestrian facilities include a paved shoulder on the south side of the road. A paved shoulder is provided on the east side of ! 68'h Avenue SE. Since the,pedestrian routes are greater than a mile from the proposed pl~ students will likely be bussed to the schools. CONCLUSIONS The plat of Evendell will not create any significant adverse conditions on the surrounding transportation network. Under the R-4 zoning alternative, the plat will generate approximately generate 411 daily, 32 AM peak hour and 43 PM peak hour new vehicle trips. The R-6 alternative is estimated to generate 708 daily, 55 AM peak hour and 75 PM peak hour trips. As determined from the analysis, the R-4 alternative will meet the County intersection analysis standard at two intersections: site access/l 60'h Avenue SE and SE I 28th Street/l 60th Avenue SE. The R-6 alternative will meet the standard at three intersections: SE !28th Street/148th Avenue SE, SE !28th Street/156th Avenue SE, and SE 136th Street/156th Avenue SE. All analysis intersections were determined to operate at an acceptable level of service for the 2004 with and without project conditions under both alternatives. The turn lane warrant analysis for the R-4 alternative, determined that neither a northbound left nor a southbound right turn lane is warranted at the Site Access/l 60th Avenue SE intersection. Garry Struthers Associates, Inc. Page20 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Traffic Impact Analysis Evende/1 Under the R-6 alternative, it was determined that neither a southbound left nor a northbound right tum lane is warranted at the SE 136'h Street/I 56th Avenue SE intersection. TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION Evendell will be required to pay a MPS mitigation fee of $117,820 (43•$2,740) for the R-4 alternative and $205,500 (75•$2740) for the R-6 alternative based on $2,740 per unit for Concurrency Zone 449. No other traffic mitigation is deemed necessary. Garry Struthers Associates, Inc. Page 21 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Evendell SE 128th Streel/148th Ave SE PM PEAK HOUR " " m i (!) 0 a. " C :; a. ~ e C) 0 0 N ~ m a, EBLT 65 2 EBT 1164 35 EBRT 0 0 WBLT 0 0 WBT 604 18 WBRT 31 1 NBLT 0 0 NBT 0 0 NBRT 0 0 SBLT 58 2 SBT 0 0 SBRT 57 2 1979 60 6/28/014:49 PM 0 u 0 'e' a. 0 .5 oi -~ a. 0 c.:, C) C ,1 0 u 0 ·e- a. 0 .5 oi a. a: C 0 E ill u 0 ·e- a. s 0 " "' s: s. 0 9 76 46 71 1316 0 136 136 0 19 19 18 1 641 0 2 2 36 0 75 75 0 1 1 0 12 12 3 2 65 0 1 1 0 6 65 69 335 2443 "' C) .5 C -~ 0 N 0 N C) C ·2 ~ 'f 0: oi " C ~ w "' C ·2 0 N 'I' 0: oi " C ~ w 'f 0: u 0 'e' a. " ,: s: ~ 'I' 0: u 0 ·e- a. E s: 8 N ~ 0 u m LL 5 0 :c " m 0 a. 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 2 ... c ~ ~ 0 0 76 76 15 28 1331 1344 0.97 0.005 0 0 136 136 0 0 19 19 6 10 647 651 0.87 0.002 0 0 36 36 0 0 75 75 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 12 12 1 1 66 66 0 0 1 1 0.81 0 0 0 65 65 22 39 2465 2482 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Evendell SE 128th Streel/156th Ave SE PM PEAK HOUR .c 3' " .. e (!) cf "C C :; a. , e O> 0 0 N ii .. ID EBLT 0 0 EBT 670 20 EBRT 415 12 WBLT 336 10 WBT 549 16 WBRT 0 0 NBLT 222 7 NBT 0 0 NBRT 125 4 SBLT 0 0 SBT 0 0 SBRT 0 0 2317 69 6/28/014:49 PM .. u • 'e' a. .. u • ·e • a. .5 'ii .9-a. 0 () O> C >2 ~ .5 'ii f C ~ &! 0 0 19 11 30 4 4 0 11 25 0 0 9 7 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 47 O> .5 C O> C ·2 0 N 0 N u • 'e' a. s 0 .c "' s: 1! 2 O> C ·c 0 N 1 a: 'ii "C C ~ w O> C ·2 0 N ~ 'ii "C C ~ w ~ u • ·e a. .c ~ 1! 2 'I' a: u • ·e a. i 1! 0 N 5 u .. LL " , 0 l: " .. • a. .. • .. , ~ ii 2 I- c ~ cf 0 0 0 0 0 720 16 21 736 741 0.94 0.004 461 0 8 461 469 350 0 0 350 350 601 6 2 607 603 0.96 0 0 0 0 0 0 245 0 8 245 253 0 0 0 0 0 0.81 0.009 131 0 0 131 131 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2508 22 39 2530 2547 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Evendell SE 136th Streel/156th Ave SE PM PEAK HOUR ~ " .. i (!) m 0. ,, C ::! 0. 0 0 N ~ e l .. ID EBLT o 0 EBT o 0 EBRT 1 o WBLT o o WBT o o WBRT o o NBLT o o NBT 239 7 NBRT o o SBLT o o SBT 647 19 SBRT 2 o 889 26 6/28/014:49 PM 0 ts m ·e 0. tl m ·e m 0. .5 j 0. m .5 oi .e. 0 () "' C ,2 0. C ~ m 0: 11 o 0 0 10 13 0 o 0 0 0 o 4 24 0 7 0 0 0 o 0 4 34 0 59 48 "' "' C C ·2 ·2 0 0 N N ts m ·e 0. s 0 ~ " 3: cl 2 "' C ·2 0 N 'f 0: 'ii ,, C ~ w "' C ·2 0 N ~ 'ii ,, C ~ w 'f 0: ts ·~ 0. ~ cl 2 'I' 0: ts m e' 0. ~ " 3: cl 2 0 ts .. u. ~ ~ 0 :,: " .. m 0. 0 m 0 ~ ~ "II 2 ,- 1: ·~ m 0. 11 0 o 11 11 0 0 o 0 0 0.23 o 24 o o 24 24 o o 8 o 8 o o o o o o o o o 8 o 8 28 0 o 28 28 253 0 o 253 253 0.86 0.004 o 0 6 o 6 o 0 8 0 8 670 0 o 670 670 0.86 0.006 36 0 o 36 36 1022 0 30 1022 1052 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Evendell SE 128th Streel/158th Ave SE PM PEAK HOUR .c " • I (!) m a. " C ::; a. , e "' 0 0 N ti • a, EBLT a 0 EBT 750 23 EBRT 14 0 WBLT 3 0 WBT 760 23 WBRT a 0 NBLT 5 0 NBT a 0 NBRT 5 0 SBLT a 0 SBT a 0 SBRT a 0 1537 .45 6/28/014:49 PM • tl m 'e' a. • tl m 'e' m a. .5 8. ii: ci u "' C i2 m C ii D. ii: C 11 & a 0 21 6 0 1 0 0 15 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 25 "' "' C C ·2 ·2 0 N 0 N tl m ·e a. " 0 .c "' s: 1! 0 N "' .5 C 0 N ~ 'ii " C m > w "' C ·2 0 N : 'ii " C ~ w ~ tl m e' Q. € s: 1! ~ : tl m e' a. .c "' s: ... 0 0 N " 0 tl • ... " , 0 :c " • i!'. • m • , ~ " u 2 .... c ~ m Q. 0 0 0 0 0 800 16 0 816 800 0.86 0.004 15 0 21 15 36 3 0 0 3 3 816 6 0 822 816 0.97 0.007 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 5 7 0 0 0 0 0 0.58 0 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1644 22 23 1666 1667 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Evendell SE 136th S1/158th Ave SE PM PEAK HOUR ,: " .. I t!) • .. "C C :;; .. , e 0, 0 0 N jj .. ID EBLT 0 EBT 0 EBRT 0 WBLT 0 WBT 0 WBRT 0 NBLT 0 NBT 0 NBRT 0 SBLT 0 SBT 0 SBRT 0 0 6/28/014:49 PM 0 ts • ·e-.. 0 ts • 'e' • .. •• • _g. .. ci () 0, C " • C ii _g. .. C ~ ,l! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, C ·c 13 ts • 'e' a. s 0 ,: " ~ 11 !?. 0, C ·;; 0 N .., "' • "C C • > w 0, C ·2 0 N ~ • "C C ~ w ~ ts ·~ a. ~ .. 0 0 N 5 ts .. u. s 0 :,: " .. • a. 0 • 0 , ~ ti 2 ... c ~ • a. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 0 0 0 0 14 14 0 0 0 13 13 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 0 0 0 2 2 0.9 0 0 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 21 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 75 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Evendell SE 128th S1reel/160th Ave SE PM PEAK HOUR " " m I Cl m 0.. 'D C ::! 0.. , e 0, ;; 2 ti m CD EBLT 7 0 EBT 755 23 EBRT 56 2 WBLT 35 1 WBT 736 22 WBRT 5 0 NBLT 24 1 NBT 0 0 NBRT 22 1 SBLT 4 0 SBT 1 0 SBRT 6 0 1651 50 6/28/014:49 PM m 1l m ·e 0.. m ~ m -~ 0.. 0 () 0, C i2 m 1l m ·e 0.. m .5 'ii Q. ii: C ~ m "' 1l m 'e' 0.. ;; 0 " "' s: cl !?. 0 0 7 6 10 794 15 0 73 2 0 38 0 25 783 0 0 5 9 0 34 0 0 0 1 0 24 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 6 33 35 1769 0, 0, C C ·2 ·2 ~ ~ 0, .5 C 0 N "t "' 'ii 'D C ~ w 0, .5 C 0 N 'I' "' 'ii 'D C m > w "t "' 1l m ·e- 0.. " "' ' s: cl 0 N 'I' "' 1l m e' 0.. ~ cl 0 N 0 ti m u. " , 0 :c " m m 0.. m m m , ~ ti 2 ... E ~ m 0.. 0 0 7 7 0 0 794 794 0.89 0 16 0 89 73 7 11 45 49 0 0 783 783 0.96 0 0 0 5 5 6 0 40 34 0 0 0 0 0.92 0 3 6 27 30 0 0 4 4 0 0 1 1 0.46 0 0 0 6 6 32 17 1801 1786 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Evendell Site Access/1 &0th Ave SE PM PEAK HOUR .c " m i (.') .. a. .., C :; a. ~ e D> 0 0 N i'l m a, EBLT 0 EBT 0 EBRT 0 WBLT 0 WBT 0 WBRT 0 NBLT 0 NBT 44 NBRT 0 SBLT 0 SBT 91 SBRT 0 135 6/28/014:49 PM {l • ·e- a. {l .. 'e' .. a. a .. .e. a. ci () D> C ,1 .. .s ,; 0. a: C Jl C &! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 3 17 0 0 4 27 " .s C 0 N 1l .. ·e a. s 0 ~ 1! 2 " C ·2 0 N i i .., C .. > w D> C ·2 0 N 'I' "' ,; .., C ~ w 't "' 1l ~ a. E ;: 1! 2 ~ m u. ~ ~ 0 :r " m .. a. 0 .. 0 ~ a, " " u ~ c ~ .. a. 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 55 0 0 55 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 0 0 111 0.9 0 0 0 23 0 23 0 166 43 0 209 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I T'l---1-.CI TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analvst JMS Intersection SE 128TH ST/148TH AVE SE Anencv/Co. GSA furisdiction KING CO. Date Performed ~nalvsis Year 9 001 EXISTING llnalvsis Time Period PM PEAK Proiect ID EVENDELL East/West Street: SE 128TH STREET North/South Street: 148TH A VENUE SE Intersection Orientation: East-West Studv Period hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments Maior Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 65 1164 0 0 604 31 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 72 1164 0 0 604 31 Percent Heavv Vehicles 0 .. .. 0 .. .. Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Unstream Sinnal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 1 269 0 58 743 57 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Hourlv Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 58 0 63 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade {%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration L R Delav, Queue Len nth, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT L R Iv (vph) 72 58 63 C (m) (vph) 958 134 684 Ivie 0.08 0.43 0.09 95% queue length 0.24 1.91 0.30 Control Delay 9.1 50.9 10.8 LOS A F B Approach Delay .. .. 30.0 Approach LOS .. .. D HCS2000™ Copyright© 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 . -. ·-----·-·-----·-·--r I 3: SE 128TH ST & 148TH AVE SE (2004 WITHOUT PROJECT) PM PEAK 6/28/2001 I Lanes, Volumes, Timings .P ---(> ~ ef' <l-" ~ t I" \. ! <I I Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ~ ~loo 1900 ~loo i9oo p 4' p Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 I Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (fl) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Total Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 I Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt Protected 0.986 0.992 0.850 0.850 I Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.953 0.953 Said. Flow (pro!) 1770 3490 0 1770 3511 0 0 1775 1583 0 1775 1583 Frt Perm. 0.986 0.992 0.850 0.850 I Flt Perm. 0.294 0.138 0.724 0.728 Satd. Flow (perm) 548 3490 0 257 3511 0 0 1349 1583 0 1356 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 25 13 13 72 I Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 76 1316 136 19 641 36 75 1 12 65 1 65 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) I Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% I Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 84 1462 151 21 712 40 83 1 13 72 1 72 I Lane Group Flow (vph) 84 1613 0 21 752 0 0 84 13 0 73 72 Turn Type Pm+Pt Pm+Pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 I Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 I Total Split (s) 8.0 32.0 0.0 8.0 32.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split(%) 13% 53% 0% 13% 53% 0% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% Maximum Green (s) 4.0 28.0 4.0 28.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 I Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag I Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None None Min Min Min Min Min Min I Synchro 4 Report Page I Garrystr-st4 l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3: SE 128TH ST & 148TH AVE SE (2004 WITHOUT PROJECT) PM PEAK Lanes, Volumes, Timings .P Lane Groue EBL Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Lane Grp Cap (vph) 437 vis Ratio Prat 0.01 vis Ratio Perm 0.11 Critical LG? Yes Act Effct Green (s) 31.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 vie Ratio 0.18 Uniform Delay, d1 2.6 Percentile Delay 3.5 Percentile LOS A Uniform Delay, d1 2.6 Platoon Factor 1.00 I ncr. Delay, d2 0.2 Webster Delay 2.8 Webster LOS A Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 Queue Length 95th (fl) 19 Link Length (ft) 50th Up Block Time (%) 95th Up Block Time (%) Turn Bay Length (fl) 50th Bay Block Time % 95th Bay Block Time % Queuing Penalty (veh) Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 47.2 Natural Cycle: 60 -I> EBT 5.0 11.0 0 2029 0.46 Yes 27.3 0.62 0.74 7.6 9.7 A 7.6 1.00 2.2 9.9 A 96 #392 832 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Total Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical vis Ratios: 0.54 Intersection vie Ratio: 0.63 Intersection Percentile Signal Delay: 8.9 Intersection Percentile LOS: A Intersection Webster Signal Delay: 8.8 Intersection LOS: A 'l;, '(j <J-4... EBR WBL WBT WBR 5.0 11.0 0 200 1918 0.00 0.21 0.06 29.9 24.1 0.56 0.55 0.07 0.39 2.8 6.1 3.7 6.9 A A 2.8 6.1 1.00 1.00 0.2 0.1 3.0 6.2 A A 1 57 7 108 3744 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Garrystr-st4 I '\ NBL 5.0 11.0 0 t I" NBT NBR 5.0 5.0 11.0 11.0 0 0 266 322 0.06 0.01 Yes 9.3 9.3 0.21 0.21 0.29 0.04 16.2 0.0 16.4 9.2 B A 16.2 0.0 1.00 1.00 3.1 0.2 19.3 0.2 B A 18 0 55 0 1762 6/28/2001 ~ ! ./ SBL SBT SBR 5.0 5.0 5.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 0 0 0 267 370 0.05 0.04 9.3 9.3 0.21 0.21 0.26 0.18 16.1 0.0 16.2 5.5 B A 16.1 0.0 1.00 1.00 2.5 1.2 18.6 1.2 B A 16 0 49 24 1470 Synchro 4 Report Page2 I 3: SE 128TH ST & 148TH AVE SE (2004 WITHOUT PROJECT) PM PEAK 6/28/2001 I Splits and Phases: 3: SE 128TH ST & 148TH AVE SE I (1 •3 ,-'r, . ' -~ i, ' .... ~·i·: •7 I r • C I I I I I I I I jl I I I I I Synchro 4 Report Page3 Garrystr-st4 l :I I 3: SE 128TH ST & 148TH AVE SE (2004 WITH PROJECT R-6 ZONING) I PM PEAK 6/28/2001 Lanes, Volumes, Timings I .)> -!> "'\, 'J <l-4.... '\ t I' \. ! ,d Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 'i 'l'f. 'i 'l'f. ,f 'f1 i900 ~900 I Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Total Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 I Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt Protected 0.986 0.992 0.850 0.850 I Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.953 0.953 Said. Flow (prot) 1770 3490 0 1770 3511 0 0 1775 1583 0 1775 1583 Frt Perm. 0.986 0.992 0.850 0.850 I Flt Perm. 0.289 0.138 0.724 0.727 Said. Flow (perm) 538 3490 0 257 3511 0 0 1349 1583 0 1354 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes I Satd. Flow (RTOR) 25 13 13 72 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 76 1344 136 19 651 36 75 1 12 66 1 65 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) I Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% I Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 84 1493 151 21 723 40 83 1 13 73 1 72 I Lane Group Flow (vph) 84 1644 0 21 763 0 0 84 13 0 74 72 Turn Type Pm+Pt Pm+Pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 I Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 I Minimum Split (s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 8.0 32.0 0.0 8.0 32.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split(%) 13% 53% 0% 13% 53% 0% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% Maximum Green (s) 4.0 28.0 4.0 28.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 I Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag I Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None None Min Min Min Min Min Min I Synchro 4 Report Pagel Garrystr-st41 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3: SE 128TH ST & 148TH AVE SE (2004 WITH PROJECT R-6 ZONING) PM PEAK Lanes, Volumes, Timings .)> Lane Groue EBL Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Lane Grp Cap (vph) 433 vis Ratio Prot 0.01 vis Ratio Perm 0.11 Critical LG? Yes Act Effct Green (s) 31.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 vie Ratio 0.18 Uniform Delay, d1 2.6 Percentile Delay 3.5 Percentile LOS A Uniform Delay, d1 2.6 Platoon Factor 1.00 Iner. Delay, d2 0.2 Webster Delay 2.8 Webster LOS A Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 Queue Length 95th (ft) 19 Link Length (ft) 50th Up Block Time (%) 95th Up Block Time (%) Turn Bay Length (ft) 50th Bay Block Time % 95th Bay Block Time % Queuing Penalty (veh) Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 47.9 Natural Cycle: 60 --<> EBT 5.0 11.0 0 2050 0.47 Yes 28.0 0.63 0.75 7.6 10.1 B 7.6 1.00 2.4 10.0 A 100 #405 832 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Total Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical vis Ratios: 0.54 Intersection v/c Ratio: 0.64 Intersection Percentile Signal Delay: 9.2 Intersection Percentile LOS: A Intersection Webster Signal Delay: 8.9 Intersection LOS: A ""t, q <l-~ EBR WBL WBT WBR 5.0 11.0 0 201 1941 0.00 0.22 0.06 30.6 24.8 0.56 0.55 0.07 0.39 2.7 6.0 3.7 6.9 A A 2.7 6.0 1.00 1.00 0.2 0.1 2.9 6.2 A A 1 59 7 110 3744 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Garrystr-st41 "\ t /> NBL NBT NBR 5.0 5.0 5.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 0 0 0 262 318 0.06 0.01 Yes 9.3 9.3 0.21 0.21 0.30 0.04 16.6 0.0 16.5 9.2 B A 16.6 0.0 1.00 1.00 3.2 0.2 19.8 0.2 B A 18 0 55 0 1762 6/28/2001 \. ~ ,:/ SBL SBT SBR 5.0 5.0 5.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 0 0 0 263 365 0.05 0.04 9.3 9.3 0.21 0.21 0.26 0.19 16.4 0.0 16.3 5.5 B A 16.4 0.0 1.00 1.00 2.7 1.2 19.1 1.2 B A 16 0 49 24 1470 Synchro 4 Report Page2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3: SE 128TH ST & 148TH AVE SE (2004 WITH PROJECT R-6 ZONING) PM PEAK Splits and Phases: 3: SE 128TH ST & 148TH AVE SE Garrystr-st41 6/28/2001 Synchro 4 Report Page 3 I 6: SE 128TH ST & 156TH AVE SE (2001 EXISTING) I PM PEAK 6/20/2001 Lanes, Volumes, Timings --!> ~ 'J <)-'\ I' I Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ·i'f· ,900 'r'r \j p Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 I Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (fl) 0 0 0 0 I Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 Total Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Leading Detector (fl) 50 50 50 50 50 I Trailing Detector (fl) 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Fri Protected 0.943 0.850 I Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow (pro!) 3337 0 1770 3539 1770 1583 Fri Perm. 0.943 0.850 I Flt Perm. 0.182 0.950 Said. Flow (perm) 3337 0 339 3539 1770 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes I Said. Flow (RTOR) 266 139 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 670 415 336 549 222 125 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) I Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Grow1h Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% I Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 744 461 373 610 247 139 I Lane Group Flow (vph) 1205 0 373 610 247 139 Turn Type Pm+Pt Perm Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 I Permitted Phases 8 2 Detector Phases 4 3 8 2 2 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 • I Minimum Split (s) 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 22.0 0.0 13.0 35.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split(%) 40% 0% 24% 64% 36% 36% Maximum Green (s) 18.0 9.0 31.0 16.0 16.0 I Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time ( s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead I Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None Coord Coord I Synchro 4 Report Page I Garrystr-st4 l I I 6: SE 128TH ST & 156TH AVE SE (2001 EXISTING) I PM PEAK 6/20/2001 Lanes, Volumes, Timings --!> "'tr if <l-'\ I' I Lane Groue EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 I Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1327 457 2059 547 585 vis Ratio Pro! 0.31 0.15 0.17 0.14 I vis Ratio Perm 0.33 0.07 Critical LG? Yes Yes Act Effct Green (s) 19.0 32.0 32.0 17.0 17.0 I Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.58 0.58 0.31 0.31 vie Ratio 0.91 0.82 0.30 0.45 0.24 Uniform Delay, d1 13.2 7.5 5.8 15.2 0.0 Percentile Delay 20.0 18.1 5.9 15.8 3.5 I Percentile LOS B B A B A Uniform Delay, d1 13.2 7.5 5.8 15.2 0.0 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I Iner. Delay, d2 9.2 10.8 0.1 2.7 1.0 Webster Delay 22.4 18.3 5.9 17.9 1.0 Webster LOS C B A B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 152 62 45 64 0 I Queue Length 95th (ft) #279 #191 68 119 28 Link Length (ft) 3744 2512 1414 50th Up Block Time(%) I 95th Up Block Time(%) Turn Bay Length (ft) 50th Bay Block Time % I 95th Bay Block Time % Queuing Penalty (veh) Area Type: Other I Cycle Length: 55 Actuated Cycle Length: 55 Offset: O (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBL and 6:, Start of Green I Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Total Lost Time: 6 I Sum of Critical v/s Ratios: 0.61 Intersection vie Ratio: 0.68 Intersection Percentile Signal Delay: 15.1 Intersection Percentile LOS: B I Intersection Webster Signal Delay: 16.3 Intersection LOS: B # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. I Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. I I Synchro 4 Report Page2 Garrystr-st41 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l1 I I 6: SE 128TH ST & 156TH AVE SE (2001 EXISTING) PM PEAK Splits and Phases: 6: SE 128TH ST & 156TH AVE SE '(J •3 -I> •4 ll Garrystr-st4 l I I 6/20/2001 Synchro 4 Report Page3 I 6: SE 128TH ST & 156TH AVE SE (2004 WITHOUT PROJECT) I PM PEAK 6/28/2001 Lanes, Volumes, Timings I --l> ""t, if" <J-'\ f> Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ~loo ,900 ~too ,900 ~900 I Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 I Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 Total Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 I Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt Protected 0.941 0.850 I Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3330 0 1770 3539 1770 1583 Frt Perm. 0.941 0.850 I Flt Perm. 0.143 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3330 0 266 3539 1770 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes I Satd. Flow (RTOR) 257 146 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 720 461 350 601 245 131 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) I Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% I Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% I Adj. Flow (vph) 800 512 389 668 272 146 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1312 0 389 668 272 146 Turn Type Pm+Pt Prat Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 2 I Permitted Phases 8 Detector Phases 4 3 8 2 2 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 I Minimum Split (s) 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 28.0 0.0 16.0 44.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split(%) 43% 0% 25% 68% 32% 32% Maximum Green (s) 24.0 12.0 40.0 17.0 17.0 I Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead I Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None Coard Coard I Synchro 4 Report Page I Garrystr-st4 l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6: SE 128TH ST & 156TH AVE SE (2004 WITHOUT PROJECT) PM PEAK Lanes, Volumes, Timings --!> ~ 1" <)-'\ /> Lane Grou~ EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1425 459 2200 506 557 v/s Ratio Prot 0.35 0.17 0.19 0.15 0.07 vis Ratio Perm 0.36 Critical LG? Yes Yes Act Effct Green (s) 24.7 40.4 40.4 18.6 18.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.62 0.62 0.29 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.85 0.30 0.54 0.26 Uniform Delay, d1 15.3 12.2 5.7 19.6 0.0 Percentile Delay 21.2 21.7 5.7 20.6 4.0 Percentile LOS C C A C A Uniform Delay, d1 15.3 12.2 5.7 19.6 0.0 Platoon Factor 0.99 0.98 0.95 1.03 1.00 Iner. Delay, d2 10.0 13.5 0.1 4.1 1.1 Webster Delay 25.1 25.5 5.5 24.1 1.1 Webster LOS C C A C A Queue Length 5oth (ft) 207 93 54 92 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #348 #233 77 160 34 Link Length (ft) 3744 2512 1414 5oth Up Block Time(%) 95th Up Block Time(%) Turn Bay Length (ft} 50th Bay Block Time % 95th Bay Block Time % Queuing Penalty (veh) Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 65 Actuated Cycle Length: 65 Offset: O (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBL and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 · Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Total Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical vis Ratios: 0.67 Intersection v/c Ratio: 0. 7 4 Intersection Percentile Signal Delay: 16.6 Intersection Percentile LOS: B Intersection Webster Signal Delay: 19.1 Intersection LOS: B # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Garrystr-st4 l 6/28/2001 Synchro 4 Report Page2 I 6: SE 128TH ST & 156TH AVE SE (2004 WITHOUT PROJECT) I PM PEAK 6/28/2001 I ;. ". ''"~ ",f' :r I I I I I I 1· I I I I I I I I Synchro 4 Report Page3 Garrystr-st4 l I I 6: SE 128TH ST & 156TH AVE SE (2004 WITH PROJECT R-6 ZONING) PM PEAK 6/28/2001 I Lanes, Volumes, Timings -<> ~ (l <J-'\ I" I Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ,j\'f> \'j ,j\,j\ \'j r1 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 I Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 I Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 Total Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 I Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 F rt Protected 0.942 0.850 I Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow (prot) 3334 0 1770 3539 1770 1583 Frt Perm. 0.942 0.850 I Flt Perm. 0.148 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3334 0 276 3539 1770 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes I Said. Flow (RTOR) 280 146 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 741 469 350 603 253 131 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) I Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% I Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 823 521 389 670 281 146 I Lane Group Flow (vph) 1344 0 389 670 281 146 Turn Type Pm+Pt Pro! Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 2 I Permitted Phases 8 Detector Phases 4 3 8 2 2 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 I Minimum Split (s) 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 0.0 13.0 40.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split(%) 45% 0% 22% 67% 33% 33% Maximum Green (s) 23.0 9.0 36.0 16.0 16.0 I Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead I Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None Coord Coord I Synchro 4 Report Page I Garrystr-st4 l I I 6: SE 128TH ST & 156TH AVE SE (2004 WITH PROJECT R-6 ZONING) I PM PEAK 6128/2001 Lanes, Volumes, Timings --!> ""tr (J <J-'\ /> I Lane Groue EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 I Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1481 417 2159 513 563 vis Ratio Pro! 0.36 0.16 0.19 0.16 0.08 I vis Ratio Perm 0.41 Critical LG? Yes Yes Act Effct Green (s) 23.6 36.6 36.6 17.4 17.4 I Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 0.61 0.61 0.29 0.29 vie Ratio 0.91 0.93 0.31 0.55 0.26 Uniform Delay, d1 13.4 11.5 5.6 18.0 0.0 Percentile Delay 18.2 34.4 5.7 18.8 3.8 I Percentile LOS B C A B A Uniform Delay, d1 13.4 11.5 5.6 18.0 0.0 Platoon Factor 0.98 0.99 0.97 1.02 1.00 I Iner. Delay, d2 8.3 27.8 0.1 4.2 1.1 Webster Delay 21.5 39.1 5.5 22.5 1.1 Webster LOS C D A C A I Queue Length 50th (fl) 185 86 51 86 0 Queue Length 95th (fl) #325 #238 75 153 32 Link Length (fl) 3744 2512 1414 50th Up Block Time(%) I 95th Up Block Time(%) Turn Bay Length (fl) 5oth Bay Block Time % I 95th Bay Block Time % Queuing Penalty (veh) Area Type: Other I Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 60 Offset: O (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBL and 6:, Start of Green I Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Ac.tuated-Coordinated Total Lost Time: 6 I Sum of Critical vis Ratios: 0. 72 Intersection vie Ratio: 0.80 Intersection Percentile Signal Delay: 16.8 Intersection Percentile LOS: B I Intersection Webster Signal Delay: 19.2 Intersection LOS: B # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. I Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. I I Synchro 4 Report Page2 Garrystr-st41 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6: SE 128TH ST & 156TH AVE SE (2004 WITH PROJECT R-6 ZONING) PM PEAK Splits and Phases: 6: SE 128TH ST & 156TH AVE SE I .... /:,. ·,. _ii Garrystr-st41 6/28/2001 Synchro 4 Report Page 3 ,···-'"-·· "·--,... __ . __ , n---1 _i: 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I General Information Site Information ~nalvst JMS Intersection SE 136TH ST/156TH A VE SE Onencv/Co. GSA Jurisdiction KING CO. I Date Performed Analvsis Year W01 EXISTING IAnalvsis Time Period PM PEAK Proiect ID EVENDELL East/West Street: SE 136TH STREET !North/South Street: 156TH A VENUE SE I Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudv Period lhrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments I Maier Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 239 0 0 647 2 I Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Hourlv Flow Rate, HFR 0 265 0 0 718 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 ----0 ---- I Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 I Configuration LT LT Unstream Sinnal 0 0 I Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 0 0 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 1 Percent Heavv Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 . Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delav, Queue Lenath, and Level of Service pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LR V (vph) 0 0 1 C (m) (vph) 892 1311 432 Ivie 0.00 0.00 0.00 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 0.01 Control Delay 9.0 7.7 13.4 LOS A A B I !Approach Delay ----13.4 !Approach LOS ----B HCS2000Th1 Copyright© 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version4.I I I 1···-"'-·· ~---~--·--· n---1-CI TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY -eneral Information Site Information nalvst JMS Intersection SE 136TH ST/156TH AVE SE ilencv/Co. GSA Jurisdiction KING CO. ate Performed o.nalvsis Year 2004 WITHOUT PROJECT alysis Time Period PM PEAK Project ID EVENDELL East/West Street: SE 136TH STREET North/South Street: 156TH A VENUE SE Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudv Period /hrs\: 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments Maior Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 28 253 0 0 670 36 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 281 0 0 744 40 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 ·---0 ---- I Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 11 0 24 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 12 0 26 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Del av, Queue Len nth, and Level of Service pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR V (vph) 31 38 C (m) (vph) 843 334 vie 0.04 0.11 95% queue length 0.11 0.38 Control Delay 9.4 17.2 LOS A C I Approach Delay .. .. 17.2 Approach LOS .. --C HCS2000TM Copyright 4) 2000 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 I I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I General Information Site Information Analyst JMS Intersection SE 136TH ST/156TH AVE SE Agency/Co. GSA 1urisdiction KING CO. I Date Performed ~nalysis Year 2004 WITH PROJECT R-6 ~nalvsis Time Period PM PEAK ZONING Project ID EVENDELL I East/West Street: SE 136TH STREET North/South Street: 156TH A VENUE SE Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments I Maior Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R I Volume 28 253 6 8 670 36 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 281 6 8 744 40 I Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 .. --0 ---- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 I Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L TR LT R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 8 0 8 11 0 24 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 0 8 12 0 26 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR De/av, Queue Lenath, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR l(vph) 31 8 16 38 C (m) (vph) 843 1287 268 294 vie 0.04 0.01 0.06 0.13 95% queue length 0.11 0.02 0.19 0.44 Control Delay 9.4 7.8 19.3 19. 1 LOS A A C C pproach Delay .. .. 19.3 19.1 Approach LOS --.. C C '!C.\"2000™ Copyright© 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 I -.. --· --···-----·····r TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst JMS Intersection SE 128TH ST/160TH AVE SE t\aency/Co. GSA Jurisdiction KING CO. Date Performed o.nalvsis Year 2001 EXISTING l\nalysis Time Period PM PEAK Project ID EVENDELL East/West Street: SE 128TH STREET North/South Street: 160TH AVENUE SE Intersection Orientation: East-West Studv Period rhrsl: 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Movement 1 2 3 4 L T R L Volume 7 755 56 35 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 755 62 35 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 ----0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 Configuration LT TR LT Upstream Sianal 0 Minor Street Northbound Movement 7 8 9 10 L T R L Volume 24 0 22 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 26 0 22 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach N Storage 0 RT Channelized 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 Lane Configuration LT LT LTR V (vph) 7 35 48 I C (m) (vph) 875 820 199 vie 0.01 0.04 0.24 I 95% queue length 0.02 0.13 0.91 Control Delay 9.1 9.6 28.7 LOS A A D I Approach Delay ----28.7 ll\pproach LOS ----D HCS2000n 1 Copyright© 2000 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved I I .. -. ·-----·-·-·-··---·, Westbound 5 6 T R 736 5 1.00 1.00 736 5 ---- 0 2 0 TR 0 Southbound 11 12 T R 1 6 0.90 0.90 1 6 0 0 0 N 0 0 1 0 LTR Southbound 10 11 12 LTR 11 219 0.05 0.16 22.3 C 22.3 C Version 4. l n .. __ I _.J.' 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analvst JMS Intersection SE 128TH ST/160TH AVE SE IAnencv/Co. GSA lurisdiction KING CO. Date Performed o.nalvsis Year 2004 WITHOUT PROJECT Analvsis Time Period PM PEAK Project ID EVENDELL I I I I I East/West Street: SE 128TH STREET North/South Street: 160TH A VENUE SE Intersection Orientation: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Maior Street Movement 1 L Volume 7 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type RT Channelized Lanes 0 Configuration LT Upstream SiQnal Minor Street Movement 7 L Volume 34 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 37 . Percent Heavy Vehicles I I I I I I I I I I I 0 Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized Lanes 0 Configuration Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB Movement 1 Lane Configuration LT V (vph) 7 C (m) (vph) 840 vie 0.01 95% queue length 0.03 Control Delay 9.3 LOS A Approach Delay .. Approach LOS -· Studv Period hrs): 0.25 Eastbound 2 3 4 T R L 794 73 38 1.00 0.90 1.00 794 81 38 -· .. 0 Undivided 0 2 0 0 TR LT 0 Northbound 8 9 10 T R L 0 24 4 0.90 1.00 1.00 0 24 4 .o 0 0 0 N 0 0 1 0 0 LTR WB Northbound 4 7 8 9 LT LTR 38 61 780 163 0.05 0.37 0.15 1.59 9.9 39.7 A E .. 39.7 --E HCS2000TM Copyright© 2000 Universi1y of Florida. All Rights Reserved I I Westbound 5 6 T R 783 5 1.00 1.00 783 5 -· .. 0 2 0 TR 0 Southbound 11 12 T R 1 6 0.90 0.90 1 6 0 0 0 N 0 0 1 0 LTR Southbound 10 11 12 LTR 11 194 0.06 0.18 24.7 C 24.7 C Vcrsmn 4. l TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection SE 128TH ST/160TH AVE SE 'lnalyst JMS Jurisdiction KING CO. l\aency/Co. GSA Date Performed Analysis Year 2004 WITH PROJECT R-4 nalvsis Time Period PM PEAK ZONING I Proiect ID EVENDELL East/West Street: SE 128TH STREET North/South Street: 160TH A VENUE SE Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 7 794 89 45 783 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 794 98 45 783 5 I Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 ----0 ---- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream SiQnal 0 0 I Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 40 0 27 4 1 6 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 44 o 27 4 1 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) o 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized o o Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR I V (vph) 7 45 71 11 C (m) (vph) 840 769 152 187 Ivie 0.01 0.06 0.47 0.06 95% queue length 0.03 0.19 2.17 0.19 Control Delay 9.3 10.0-47.9 25.5 I LOS A A E D Approach Delay ----47.9 25.5 Approach LOS ----E D Copyright© 2000 Universily of Florida. All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I n_ --I _.i_• 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection SITE A CCESS/160TH A VE Analvst JMS SE ~aencv/Co. GSA Jurisdiction KING CO. Date Performed Analysis Year 2004 WITH PROJECT R-4 o,nalysis Time Period PM PEAK ZONING Proiect ID EVENDELL East/West Street: SITE ACCESS North/South Street: 160TH AVENUE SE Intersection Orientation: North-South Studv Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments Maior Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 4 55 30 0 111 23 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 61 0 0 123 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 ----0 ---- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Siqnal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 9 796 7 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 10 0 7 Percent Heavy-Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delav, Queue Lenath, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR V (vph) 4 17 C (m) (vph) 1446 835 vie 0.00 0.02 95% queue length 0.01 0.06 Control Delay 7.5 9.4 LOS A A ~pproach Delay ----9.4 Approach LOS --.. A Copyright© 2000 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I General Information Site Information Intersection SE 136TH ST/158TH A VE SE "-nalyst JMS "-aency/Co. GSA 'urisdiction KING CO. I 2004 WITH PROJECT R-6 Date Performed ~nalysis Year ZONING Analvsis Time Period PM PEAK Proiect ID EVENDELL I East/West Street: SE 136TH STREET North/South Street: 158TH AVENUE SE Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments I Maier Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R I Volume 16 2 9 0 21 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 2 9 0 23 0 I Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 ----0 ---- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 I Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream SiQnal 0 0 I Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R I Volume 13 0 0 0 0 14 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 0 0 0 0 15 I Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N I Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 I Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service I Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR I V (vph) 17 0 13 15 C (m) (vph) 1605 1621 906 1060 ~le 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 95% queue length 0.03 0.00 0.04 0.04 Control Delay 7.3 7.2 9.0 8.4 ~OS A A A A pproach Delay ----9.0 8.4 pproach LOS ----A A .HCS2000"' Copyright© 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Resenied Version 4.1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LEFT TURN LANE WARRANT CALCULATION Intersection: SE 136th Street/156th Avenue SE Project: Evendell Volumes: PM Peak INPUTS: v. = volume advancing= v.= VL= v= p threshold = T= lg= t. = CALCULATIONS: volume opposing = volume left turns = operating speed = utilization factor threshold (based on speed) average time to make left tum = critical gap = left turn exit = VLNa average headway (3600N0 ) vehicles opposing/sec (Vof3600) [3600/{V 0 e·IVolg/3S00)}]-(3600N ol·lg 714 vph 287 vph 8 vph 35 mph 0.0225 40 mph, p = 0.020; 50 mph, p = 0.015; 60 mph, p = 0.010 3 sec 5 sec 1.9 sec 1.12% percent 5.04 sec 0.080 veh/sec 1.14 sec L= t. = t.o= tw= :i.,= # of arrivals/hour of through vehicles behind left turning vehicles = [L(1-L)V 0)(t., +t.,)/[(2/3)!,,] 7.16 P= e·"'19 (t.0 1g+1) 0.94 A= (1-P)3600 220 B= ((1-P))3600t2 110 µ= (3600-A-B)/T 1090 p= ,.,/µ 0.0066 IS LEFT TURN POCKET WARRANTED? NO ENG/97PROJ/97032.04/LtTumCalcs.xls6/28/015:16 PM I I I I I I I I I I I I > I Cl Cl - w :iE ::i _. 0 > z a:: ::i I- I- :I: c..:, -a:: a:: ::i 0 :I: ::.::: <( w a.. RIGHT-TURN LANE GUIDELINES 80 60 40 20 Right-Turn Pocket or Toper <Figure 910-120) Recommended ' Radius Only Reqommended Figure 910 -!7 l (j; +-------------·--·--0----- ' 0 100 200 ~300 Right-Turn Lone <Figure 910-!2bl Recommended 400 500 600 PEAK HOUR APPROACH VOLUME COOHV)o ?tAIL tlDv e. A\?PEDA0H \JDL, ::. 281 ?C:A.-\c. \-\OUt er ·,v.t.JJ '../PL ::(Q ~For two lone highways, use the peak hour opprooch volume (through+ right turn). 700 For multi lone, high speed <posted ot 45 mph or obovel highways, use the right lane peak hour approach volume (through+ right turnl. I Note: When al I three of the fol lowing conditions ore met, the right turn DDHV is reduced by 20 VPH. I I I I I !. Posted speed 45 mph or under. 2. Tight-turn volume greater than 40 VPH. 3. Total approach volume less than 300 VPH. Intersections At Grade Page 910-26 Right-Turn Lane Guidelines Figure 910-11 (Metric) Design Manual August 1997 / I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LEFT TURN LANE WARRANT CALCULATION Intersection: SE 136th StreeU158th Avenue SE Project: Even dell Volumes: PM Peak INPUTS: V -.-volume advancing = 27 vph v.= volume opposing = 21 vph VL= volume left turns = 16 vph v= operating speed = 25 mph p threshold = utilization factor threshold 0.0275 40 mph, p = 0.020; (based on speed) 50 mph, p = 0.015; 60 mph, p = 0.01 O T= average time to make left turn = 3 sec lg= critical gap = 5 sec t. = left turn exit = 1.9 sec CALCULATIONS: L= VLNa 59.26% percent \ t. = average headway (3600N8 ) 133.33 sec I "-o= vehicles opposing/sec (V of3600) 0.006 veh/sec tw= [3600/{V0 e·(Votora•oo>}]-(3600N 0 )-lg 0.07 sec )..,= # of arrivals/hour of through vehicles behind left turning vehicles = [L(1-L)V .J(lw+t.,)/[(2/3)1.) 0.14 P= e·,.'9()..0 1g+1) 1.00 A= (1-PJ3600 2 B= (( 1-p ))3600/2 1 µ= (3600-A-B)/T 1199 p= ,._,/µ 0.0001 IS LEFT TURN POCKET WARRANTED? NO ENGl97PROJ/97032.041LtTumCalcs.xls I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > ::i::: 0 0 - LLJ ::E :::J ...J 0 > 80 ~ 60 :::J I- I- ::i::: Q -a: a: :::J 0 ::i::: ~ < LLJ a. 40 20 0 RIGHT-TURN LANE GUIDELINES Right-Turn Pocket or Toper !Figure 910-120> Right-Turn Lone !Figure 910-12bl Recommended Recommended Radius Only Recommended c Figure 910 -7 l 100 200 300 400 PEAK HOUR APPROACH f Y\,\ P~ l1DL.1.IL A-f Pf; VD l.. = 7-1 P I'\. Pt:, fibll t-rl., Th 10J V DL :: 0 500 600 VOLUME CDDHVl<> o For two lone highways, use the peak hour approach volume !through+ right turn). 700 For multi lone, high speed <posted at 45 mph or above> highways, use the right lone peak hour approach volume (through+ right turn>. Note: When ol I three of the fol lowing conditions ore met, the right turn DDHV is reduced by 20 VPH. 1. Posted speed 45 mph or under. 2. Tight-turn volume greater than 40 VPH. 3. Total approach volume less than 300 VPH. Intersections At Grade Page910-26 Right-Turn Lane Guidelines Figure 910-11 (Metric) Design Manual August 1997 '· • ,, --· r:. _/ I I I I I I I I I LEFT TURN LANE WARRANT CALCULATION Intersection: Site Access/160th Avenue SE Project: Evendell Volumes: PM Peak INPUTS: v.= volume advancing = 59 vph Vo= volume opposing = 134 vph VL= volume left turns = 4 vph v= operating speed = 25 mph p threshold = utilization factor threshold 0.0275 40 mph, p = 0.020; (based on speed) 50 mph, p = 0.015; 60 mph, p = 0.010 T= average time to make left turn = 3 sec t,, = critical gap = 5 sec t.= left turn exit = 1.9 sec I CALCULATIONS: I I I I I I I I I L = VLNa t. = average headway (3600N.) vehicles opposing/sec (Vof3600) (3600/(V 0 e-<VotQ13SOOl}l-(3600N 0 )-t,, 6. 78% percent 61.02 sec 0.037 veh/sec 0.50 sec # of arrivals/hour of through vehicles behind left turning vehicles = [L(1-L)V8 ](1w+t,,)/[(2/3)t.] 0.22 P= e·•otg(Aot,,+1) 0.98 A= (1-P)3600 55 B= (( 1-p ))3600/2 28 µ= (3600-A-B)/T 1172 p= ,..,/µ 0.0002 IS LEFT TURN POCKET WARRANTED? NO ENG/97PROJ/97032.04/LtTumCalcs.xls :I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > :c 0 0 - w ~ ::J ...J 0 > z a::: ::> I- I- :::r: (.:) -a::: a::: ::J 0 :c ~ <( w a.. 80 60 40 ?.P RIGHT-TURN LANE GUIDELINES Right-Turn Pocket or Toper <Figure 910-120> Recommended Right-Turn Lone <Figure 910-120> Recommended Z31--~~~~~~ 20 0 Rodi s Only Recommended < Fi ure 910 -7 > 300 400 500 600 100 1=~ 200 PEAK HOUR APPROACH VOLUME COOHV)o PE.l\ll.fti A.fiJr VOL= 134- vt..M'. .. 1-He. tr 'fl,(JtJ VDL.r l3 o For two lone highways, use the peok hour approach volume (through+ right turn). 700 For multi lone, high speed <posted at 45 mph or above> highways, use the right lone peak hour approach volume (through+ right turn>. Note: When o I I three of the fo I I owing cond it i ans ore met, the right turn DDHV is reduced by 20 VPH. 1. Posted speed 45 mph or under. 2. Tight-turn volume greater thoh 40 VPH. 3. Total approach volume less than 300 VPH. lnterser:t/ons At Grade Page 91 CJ.26 Right-Tum Lane Guidelines Figure 910-11 (Metric:) Design Manual August 1997 .. • ,,--. . ( _/ ·-- ·,,,. ,, 'J,;, ..,,. ///1,, ·~~/ .,, ' . il.'l!..•7,':; "''' yfj l, '" l'' , .. ,/ff ,· 'I'' ,,,, ' (." .,, ,.,,, ,,.·' ,~, ,• ''· ,,, fi,?A,, :1df· 11, , Ji?· ; :,), · u, , :.1.11 6, : ;,.. , b,::,,f1c;,;,,.i,.!,hi; f', :J·, , '.41/ti!h(lffi/llJilJ/!/lil,l;lii,~tfJ~~,,f;j/tjli!!l/l,i!if/!!lilf!4f !~ ,! 1;1f,M111@1Jo1'4ifll!Jl~*f!it'ilt,i/iwri/;P/l · · · · , iJJi . .,, {t,'f";i,,,: :;,7/4 .• ,,}Ii " 'ff/•,:!" ' . ' ' ·!//,1/,t'l{ % / (;,: ~~1(4,f f'J . 1/#f/Jf,~1' ,: ('.. :tj,~~1,,,1:-'''.;:~ ' ) ' 0 e '1· ~1;)1t~ ... it i11i::..i,1~ ?·1, :i 1J!/J1h,11, :ffe}#1 +;'.\,:':. 1'', :.:'.W;,.·:;,, 'fh,,·•11 • ,f/.,, " ,,.,,, __ ' .,, 0 " i 'I . ' ' , 1,, I, f,, ' :1 ,, I'•,. ,,,:,",,,, I ,,'1•1/1,;;· •. , ,,,,,, ,1,:,_;,. / ,.,J;_fllifl41i,, ' [) ' n,'. 'l II U I I :1 I u 110 I ;ID ' ilJ I : IJ i IJ rt] I I ~ Cl [I iJI DI WIETlAND EVALUATION AND DELINEATION REPORT,. , WllDllFE HABITAT EVALUATION, AND COMPENSATORY WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN EVENDELL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY King County, Washington Part of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. \.__.,__ ------------ prepared for Centurion Development Services 22617 -8th Drive SE Bothell, Washington 98021 prepared by HABITAT TECHNOLOGIES P.O. Box 1088 Puyallup, Washington 98371-1088 Exhibit No. --'/_1,..._ __ _ Item No. J..Jj If on llo"t:LOO-'no. Received 3 · (o -C) 3 King County Hearing Examiner 253-845-5119 m31'2(;· • , ·,;',·_Q) D l:.i '' ' '' I J1__ ;..i:~ : -!.~=~· May 15, 2001 .,, if" ' ·~ ""\ . ·.: '."' :\.v. ~~ .. .J •.••• t.J. l@ il (p)@{Q) 8~ @ wetlands, streams, fisheries, wildlife -mitigation and permitting solutions P.O. Box 1088, Puyallup, Washington 98371 voice 253-845-5119 fall 253-841-1942 MAIN FILE COPY ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Evendell Residential Community is approximately 14 acres in total size and located to the east of the City of Renton, King County, Washington. The project site is comprised of two adjacent parcels; Parcel A of 11.5 acres, and Parcel 8 of 2.5 acres directly to the west of Parcel A. The Parcel A portion of the project site is dominated by a mature Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesi1) forest plant community on the periphery of the parcel that has been planted following prior forest harvest activities. A single- family dwelling is located in the northern portion of Parcel A. The center of Parcel A has been cleared and is dominated by a dense canopy of Himalayan blackberries (Rubus procera). The southern portion of Parcel A is dominated by active livestock pasture. Parcel 8 portion is dominated by an active livestock pasture which also contains a single-family dwelling and four associated buildings. Onsite assessment of the project site following the procedures outlined in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Wash. Manual) and the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987 Manual) resulted in the identification of one area that exhibited hydric soils, wetland hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation consistent with the established criteria of both the Wash. and 1987 Manuals. This area had been impacted by prior forest harvest activities and grading and was dominated by a mixture of deciduous trees and shrubs. This assessment, completed in accordance with King County regulations, included an evaluation of the function and value rating for the identified wetland, a classification of the wetland following the U.S. Fish and Wildlife methods, and an identification of the standard King County buffer width required for this wetland. Onsite assessment also included an evaluation of the wildlife habitat availability and utilization. Species presence and habitat utilization were evaluated following the methods identified by Horner and Raedeke (1989) and within U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Publication 80/58 (Mikol, 1980). In addition, the King County Wildlife Study Guidelines (Draft Wildlife Management in King County, Issue Paper, 1993) were followed to assure consistency with the King County permit process and documentation of habitat types. WETLAND SIZE ONSITE CLASSIFICATION KING COUNTY FUNCTION STANDARD (square feet) (USFWS) RATING AND VALUE BUFFER RATING WIDTH A 17,162 PFOE, PEME 2 low 50 feet PFOE palustnne, forested, seasonally flooded/saturated PEME palustrine, emergent, seasonally flooded The "habitat type" best represented within the site would be that of "young conifer upland forest -low understory." This habitat type included three isolated freshwater wetlands and a mixed freshwater wetland drainage corridor. ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRIMARY HABITAT TYPES INCLUDED MINOR HABITAT TYPES Conifer Upland Forest Deciduous Forested wetland -low understorv Aaricultural Lands Persistent Lowland Shrub The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and King County, as well as a number of other local, state, and federal agencies, regulate activities in and around identified wetland and drainage corridor areas. Such regulations focus on the avoidance of adverse impacts to wetlands, streams, associated buffers and the mitigation of such impacts that cannot be avoided. King County has established criteria to categorize wetlands for purposes of regulation and the establishment of buffers. In addition, King County allows a limited amount of alterations to wetlands (i.e. isolated wetlands, roadway crossings) provided such impacts are mitigated pursuant to an approved mitigation plan. The Selected Action Plan of the Evendell project site focuses on the creation of independent Jots suitable for the development of single-family homesites consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan. Buffer averaging will be used along the western boundary of the onsite King County Class 2 Wetland (i.e. Wetland A) as a part of this lot creation. Such averaging will provide additional protection to wetlands and enhance the wetland's functions. In addition, improvements to the existing right-of-way (South 135th Street -a primary collector route for the area) which fronts the project along its northern boundary will require the unavoidable filling of the northern 200 square feet of Wetland A and the reduction of the buffer associated with this area of the wetland. Through restoration of the existing onsite wetland, addition of buffer area along the eastern side of Wetland A, and onsite erosion protections this unavoidable wetland intrusion will be fully compensated, will enhance onsite wildlife habitats, and will not adversely impact the remaining wetland area. The GOAL of the wetland mitigation and buffer averaging plan is to ensure that proposed site development actions (i.e. the improvement of an existing right-of-way to meet King County health and safety standards) do not create a short-term or long-term adverse impact to the onsite wetland or associated buffer areas. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 STUDY PURPOSE ..................................................................................................... 1 SITE DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION .................................................................................... 2 NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAPPING ......................................................... 2 STATE OF WASHINGTON PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES ............................ 2 STATE OF WASHINGTON STREAM CATALOG ....................................................... 2 KING COUNTY SENSITIVE AREAS MAPPING ......................................................... 2 SOILS MAPPING ........................................................................................................ 2 AERIAL PHOTO ANALYSIS ....................................................................................... 3 ONSITE EVALUATION -WETLANDS ........................................................................... 3 WETLAND STUDY METHODS ................................................................................... 3 FIELD OBSERVATION ............................................................................................... 4 c Vegetation ....................................................................................................... 4 c Soils ................................................................................................................ 5 D Hydrology ........................................................................................................ 5 WETLAND AND STREAM DETERMINATION ............................................................... 6 WETLAND FUNCTION AND VALUE ASSESSMENT .................................................... 6 ONSITE WETLAND VALUATION ............................................................................... 8 ONSITE EVALUATION -WILDLIFE .............................................................................. 9 WILDLIFE STUDY METHODS .................................................................................... 9 ONSITE HABITAT TYPES ........................................................................................ 10 PLANT AND ANIMAL SPECIES OBSERVATIONS .................................................. 10 MOVEMENT CORRIDORS ....................................................................................... 12 PRIORITY SPECIES ................................................................................................. 12 STATE CANDIDATE SPECIES ................................................................................ 12 REGULATORY CONSIDERATION .............................................................................. 12 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS -SECTION 404 ............................................... 13 KING COUNTY -"ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS" ORDINANCE 21A.24 ............. 13 D Wetland and Stream Classes ........................................................................ 13 D Wetland/Stream Alteration ............................................................................. 14 D Roadway Improvements ................................................................................ 14 o Required Buffers ........................................................................................... 15 SELECTED ACTION PLAN ......................................................................................... 15 ELEMENTS OF THE COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN ..................................... 16 DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PROGRAM .................... 17 GOAL AND OBJECTIVE OF THE MITIGATION PLAN ............................................. 18 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA ..................................................................................... 18 MITIGATION REPLACEMENT/ENHANCEMENT ..................................................... 19 SUMMARY TABLE OF WETLAND FUNCTIONAL BENEFITS ................................. 20 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ••• I SELECTED PLANT COMMUNITIES ........................................................................ 20 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION ............................................................................... 21 WATER QUALITY PROTECTIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION .............................. 22 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE ................................................................................ 22 PROJECT MONITORING ......................................................................................... 22 STANDARDS OF SUCCESS .................................................................................... 23 Vegetation Sampling Methodology and Monitoring Schedule ................................ 23 Vegetation Monitoring ........................................................................................... 23 Vegetation Monitoring Sequencing ........................................................................ 24 WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS .................................................................................... 25 VEGETATION MAINTENANCE PLAN ...................................................................... 25 CONTINGENCY PLAN ............................................................................................. 26 PLANT! NG NOTES ................................................................................................... 26 FINANCIAL GUARANTEE ........................................................................................ 26 FIGURESREFERENCE LIST ....................................................................................... 27 REFERENCE LIST ....................................................................................................... 28 APPENDIX A ................................................................................................................ 29 APPENDIX 6 ................................................................................................................ 30 I I I I I I "'1 I ~1 I I I I I I I I I I STANDARD OF CARE Prior to extensive site planning, this document should be reviewed and the wetland boundaries verified by the appropriate resource and permitting agencies. Wetland boundaries, wetland classifications, wetland ratings, and all proposed wetland restoration and enhancement activities should be reviewed and approved by King County and potentially other regulatory staff. The above consultants have provided professional services that are in accordance with the degree of care and skill generally accepted in the nature of the work accomplished. No other warranties are expressed or implied. The consultant is not responsible for design costs incurred before this document is approved by the appropriate resource and permitting agencies. Mark Heckert Senior Wetland Ecologist I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I INTRODUCTION This report details the culmination of activities and onsite evaluations undertaken to complete both a wetlands evaluation and a wildlife habitats assessment as an element of the planning and site development of the Evendell Project Site. The project area is approximately 14 acres in total size and generally located within a quickly urbanizing area east of the City of Renton, King County, Washington. The evaluation and delineation of onsite and adjacent wetlands, drainage corridors, and wildlife habitats is a vital element in the planning and selection of a site development action. The goal of this approach is to assure that planned site platting does not result in adverse environmental impacts to such areas. Wetlands are generally defined as "those areas of King County that are inundated or saturated by ground or surface water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." (King County Environmentally Sensitive Areas). STUDY PURPOSE This purpose of this document is to present the results of the onsite assessment and evaluation of the wetland/drainage corridor areas and the wildlife habitats within the project area. Included within this report is an assessment of the proposed impacts and compensatory actions to be taken to ensure that proposed onsite actions do not adversely impact environmentally sensitive areas. This study was designed to accommodate site planning and potential regulatory actions. This report is suitable for submittal to federal, state, and local authorities for wetland boundary verification and permitting actions. SITE DESCRIPTION The project site is generally square in shape, approximately 14 acres in total size, and located within a rapidly urbanizing area generally east of the City of Renton, King County, Washington (Figure 1). The project site is comprised of two adjacent parcels; Parcel A of 11.5 acres, and Parcel B of 2.5 acres directly to the west of Parcel A. The Parcel A portion of the project site is dominated by a mature Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesit) forest plant community on the periphery that has been planted following prior forest harvest activities. A single-family dwelling is located in the northern portion of Parcel A. The center of Parcel A has been cleared and is dominated by a dense canopy of Himalayan blackberries (Rubus procera). The southern portion of Parcel A is dominated by active livestock pasture. Parcel B portion is dominated by an active livestock pasture which also contains a single-family dwelling and four associated buildings. Evendell • 1 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 • The project site is generally flat and rolling and a narrow drainage corridor area is present generally through the northeast corner of the Parcel A portion of the site. This narrow drainage corridor had been impacted by prior forest harvest actions (i.e. clearing, harvest, roadways, slash piles), and subsequent clearing and grading as part of homesite development activity. Surface drainage within this corridor is conveyed as overland flow to the southeast to the ditch that runs south along the western side of 1601h Avenue South. However, there is no evidence onsite of a continuous stream channel. BACKGROUND INFORMATION NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAPPING The National Wetland Inventory (NWI) mapping completed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was reviewed as a part of this assessment. This mapping resource did not identify any wetlands or drainage corridors on the project site. (Figure 2). STATE OF WASHINGTON PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES The State of Washington Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) Mapping was reviewed as a part of this assessment. This mapping resource did not identify any Priority Habitats or Species onsite or within the immediate vicinity. STATE OF WASHINGTON STREAM CATALOG The State of Washington Stream Catalog for Puget Sound was reviewed as a part of this assessment. This mapping resource did not identify any streams within the project site. This mapping did identify the Green River to the south of the project site. The Green River was identified to provide habitat for a number of anadromous and resident salmonid fish species. KING COUNTY SENSITIVE AREAS MAPPING The King County Sensitive Areas Mapping was reviewed as a part of this assessment. This mapping resource did not identify any wetland areas or streams within or adjacent to the project site. (Figure 3). SOILS MAPPING A review of the mapping of soil types within the project area completed by the U.S. Soils Conservation Service (SGS) identified that the onsite soils consist primarily of Evendell -2 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (Soils Survey of King County Area Washington, Nov. 1973) (Figure 4). This soil is described as: AgC -Alderwood gravelly sandy loam: This series consists of moderately well drained soils that have a weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated substratum at a depth of 24 to 40 inches. This soil is on uplands and formed in glacial deposits. A typical pedon of Alderwood soils from O -12 inches is dark brown (1 OYR 4/3) gravelly sandy loam. From 12 to 27 inches the soil is grayish-brown (2.5YR 5/2) gravelly sandy loam with many medium, distinct mottles. This soil series is not listed as a hydric soil. AERIAL PHOTO ANALYSIS Recent aerial photos of the project site were used within the background data collection process. These aerial photos identified that a coniferous forest plant community which has been altered by prior forest harvest actions dominated the majority of the project site. A deciduous foresUshrub community was identified to pass generally within a narrow corridor north to south through the central portion of the project site. This deciduous foresUshrub community appeared to continue offsite to the south until reaching the top of slope leading in the Green River Valley. A few small pockets also dominated by a deciduous foresUshrubs were present in the north-central and west central portions of the site. The project site was within an area of large-lot single-family homesites and a number of internal roadways were present through the site. ONSITE EVALUATION -WETLANDS WETLAND STUDY METHODS Presently accepted wetland identification is based on a three parameter criteria test as established within both the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987 Manual) and the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Wash. Manual). These criteria are: 1. A predominance of hydrophytic vegetation. 2. The presence of hydric soils, and 3. The presence of wetland hydrology. Initial onsite assessment and evaluation was completed during several site visits in June and July 2000. Specific identification of wetland boundaries was completed on July 17, 2000. Assessment transects were established on a north/south pattern through the project area. Wetland assessment within the project site followed the methods and procedures outlined in both the Wash. Manual and the 1987 Manual. Onsite assessment noted that there were no differences in the identified wetland boundaries as a result to using either the Wash. Manual or the 1987 Manual. Drainage corridors were Evendell -3 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I assessed and identified in accordance with the criteria established by King County and the State of Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Forest Practice Rules (WAC 222-16-030). The boundary between wetland and non-wetland areas was established by examining the transitional gradient between wetland criteria along transects through the site. Delineation was performed using the routine methodology for areas greater than five acres as detailed in the 1987 Manual. Field data sheets are provided in Appendix A. Identified boundaries were marked in the field with number flagging. These boundaries were then surveyed and made a part of the site plan mapping. FIELD OBSERVATION o Vegetation A mature coniferous forest plant community that had been planted following prior forest harvest actions dominated approximately two-thirds of the project site. The dominant onsite species was Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesil). These mature trees formed open stands across the treed portion of the site. Additional tree species occurring onsite included Western red cedar (Thuja plicata), Western hemlock (Tsuga heterophyl/a), big leaf maple (Acer macrophy/lum), red alder (A/nus rubra), black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), cherry (Prunus spp), and cascara (Rhamnus purshiana). The understory included a wide variety of shrubs and herb species including vine maple (Acer circinatum), salal (Gaultheria sha/lon), Oregon grape (Berberis spp.), hazelnut (Cory/us cornuta), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus procera), evergreen blackberry (Rubus laciniatus), Pacific red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa), snowberry (Symphoricarpus a/bus), bracken fern (Pteridium aqui/ium), and sword fern (Polystichum munitum). Throughout the project site this plant community had been altered by prior forest harvest actions. This plant community was identified as non-hydrophytic (i.e. typical of non-wetlands). The central area of Parcel A was dominated by dense stands of Himalayan blackberry. This area had apparently been cleared of the tree canopy in the recent past, and the blackberry had colonized after the clearing. The plant community within the central drainage corridor (Wetland A) that was identified to generally pass from north to south through the site was dominated by a young, mixed deciduous forest and emergent plant community. This plant community had also been altered by prior forest harvest and grading actions which had removed the mature trees, created slash piles, and created an internal drag-road across this drainage. Observed tree species included sapling red alder, Western red cedar, black cottonwood, Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifo/ia), and Pacific willow (Salix /asiandra). The understory was dense and included salmonberry, Douglas spiraea (Spiraea doug/asil), Western crabapple (Pyrus fusca), Sitka willow (Salix sitchensis), slough sedge (Carex obnupta),horsetail Evendell -4 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (equisetum arvensis), buttercup (Ranuncu/us repens), reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), softrush (Juncus effusus), and lady fern (Athyrium filix-femina). This plant association was identified as hydrophytic in character (i.e. typical of wetlands). o Soils As identified by numerous sample plots throughout the project site, the majority of the site exhibited a soil profile typical of the Alderwood soil series. The soil was defined as gravelly sandy loam with a soil matrix color of dark brown (10YR 3/3) to brown (10YR 4/4). These soils did not exhibit redoximorphic features such as prominent soil mottles, oxidized root channels, or glayed soil layers within the first 20 inches of soil depth. The majority of the project site exhibited soil which would not be considered "hydric." Representative sample plots are identified on Figure 4. (Special note -many more sample plots were completed during the field assessment than are shown within Figure 4 or reported within Appendix A). Sample plots within the defined drainage corridor that was identified to generally pass from north to southeast through the northeast corner of the site exhibited a mixed gravelly loam soil texture. These soils appeared to be mineral in character. Soils ranged in color from very dark brown (10YR 3/1) to dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2). Redoximorphic features were present and often very prominent. Soils within these areas exhibited "hydric" characteristics. o Hydrology Onsite hydrology appeared to be the result of seasonal stormwater runoff from onsite and adjacent properties. In addition, the pattern of surface water movement appeared to have been modified by prior land use activities. These activities have included the development of offsite homesites, the development of roadways and utilities, and the placement of culverts. The general movement of surface water runoff across the site was generally to the south. The movement of surface water through the central drainage corridor did not form a continuous drainage pattern and no areas within these swales exhibited characters typical of a "stream." This area had also been impacted by an internal roadway and draglines and logging slash piles. Based on field indicators (i.e. water stained leaves, drift lines, surface water, soil saturation, oxidized root channels, wetland drainage pattern) this drainage corridor met the wetland hydrology criteria of the 1987 Manual and the Wash. Manual. Within an area located in the north-central portion of the site, directly south of the homesite and past the edge of the landscaping, pooled water was also documented. This area was in a small, isolated depression, and had been impacted by prior land use actions (i.e. root pull up, slash pile, compaction). However, based on field indicators (i.e. water stained leaves, drift lines, soil saturation, oxidized root channels, wetland Evendell -5 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •• drainage pattern) these isolated depressions met the wetland hydrology criteria of the 1987 Manual and the Wash. Manual. WETLAND AND STREAM DETERMINATION Wetland determination was based on sample plots which contained hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology in accordance with the 1987 Manual and the Wash. Manual. Based on these methods one wetland area was identified onsite (Figure 4). No area was identified onsite to exhibit characters typical of a "stream" (i.e. a continuous pattern of surface water movement, either permanent or intermittent). WETLAND SIZE ONSITE CLASSIFICATION KING COUNTY FUNCTION STANDARD A (square feet) (USFWS) RATING 17,162saft PFOE, PEME 2 PFOE palustnne, forested, seasonally flooded/saturated PEME palustrine, emergent, seasonally flooded AND VALUE BUFFER RATING WIDTH low 50 feet Wetland A: This wetland was identified within a topographic drainage that passed generally from the central northern boundary to southeast through the northeast corner of the project site. This wetland complex was dominated by a young, mixed deciduous forest and emergent community that had formed following prior forest harvest and grading activities. This plant community was very dense in the southern end and open on the north end. This wetland complex exhibited shallow ponded surface water during the winter and early growing season as a result of topography, the internal' logging road and draglines, a created berm, and an offsite roadway culvert. Soil saturation to the surface was noted to occur within a majority of this wetland complex into the early part of the growing season. As noted by a slash pile within this area forest harvest activities had been undertaken within this wetland complex. This wetland plant community ended adjacent to, but separated from, the roadside berm to 1601 h Avenue South to the south. Wetland A was identified to meet the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) criteria for classification as palustrine, forested, seasonally flooded(PFOC) and palustrine, emergent, seasonally flooded/saturated (PEME). Based on the young forested plant community this wetland complex was identified to meet the criteria for designation a King County Class 2 Wetland. WETLAND FUNCTION AND VALUE ASSESSMENT Wetlands are known to perform significant roles in the ecosystem, some of which are of immediate value to society. These roles vary greatly with the size, type, hydrology, vegetation, and location of wetland areas. Although the ecological functions performed by this wetland are complex, interrelated, and difficult to assess and quantify, methods Evendell -6 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I have been developed for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Adamus et al. 1987: Reppert et al. 1979). The functions provided by wetlands include hydrologic support, shoreline protection, stormwater and floodwater storage, water quality, groundwater recharge, and provision of wildlife habitat. The HYDROLOGIC SUPPORT FUNCTION is defined by the measure of hydrologic stability and environmental integrity which the wetland provides. This function is measured by the frequency of inundation and saturation by tidal actions, stream flow, runoff, and precipitation. Wetlands permanently inundated or saturated, or intertidal wetlands are valued as high. Medium valued wetlands are seasonally flooded or are open water systems that remain saturated during most of the growing season. Wetlands that are intermittently flooded or hydrologically isolated are considered of low value. The SHORELINE PROTECTION FUNCTION is defined by the measure of shielding from wave action, erosion, or storm damage which a wetland provides. This function is measured by the location and width of the wetland along shoreline areas, types of vegetation present, and the extent of development along the shoreline. A high value is given to wetlands along a shoreline that have a width greater than 200 yards and dense woody vegetation. A medium value is given to a wetland with a width of 100 to 200 yards, sparse woody vegetation, and dense emergent vegetation. Wetlands less than 100 yards in width and emergent or lacking vegetation are considered of low value. The STORMWATER AND FLOODWATER STORAGE FUNCTION is defined by the ability of a wetland to store water and retard flow during periods of flood or storm discharge. Wetlands of larger size are generally considered to have greater ability to provide this function. In addition, wetlands nearer to urban or potentially develop-able areas are also considered to provide greater flood protections than wetlands which are in undeveloped areas. The WATER QUALITY FUNCTION is defined by the physical, biological, and chemical processes which wetlands provide to naturally purify water. This function removes organic and mineral particulates through natural filtration. In general, wetlands of greater size, more dense vegetation, and those which are close to point sources of pollution are considered to be of higher value. Wetlands which are small (<5 acres), lacking dense vegetation, and not close to point or non-point sources of pollution are considered of low value. The GROUNDWATER RECHARGE FUNCTION is defined by the interaction of the underlying geology and soils, and the surface topography. This function provides for the movement of surface water into groundwater systems. Important to this function is wetland size, period of inundation, and depth of standing water within the wetland. High value is given to permanently inundated wetlands greater than 10 acres in size. Medium value is given to wetlands which are Evendell -7 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I seasonally flooded and 5 to 10 acres is size. Wetlands less than 5 acres in size, isolated, and temporarily saturated are considered of low value. The NATURAL BIOLOGICAL FUNCTION is defined by the complexity of physical habitats and biological species within the wetland area. The value given to a wetland depends upon its ability to provide habitat for nesting (spawning), incubation, feeding, rearing, and cover of aquatic and terrestrial animal and fish species. In addition, the ability of a wetland to provide support for varying food chains is an important element in value assessment. Wetlands of high species diversity, three or more habitat types, unique habitat features, large in size, and associated with a permanent stream or tidal marsh are considered of high value. Wetlands with moderate species diversity, two habitat types, moderate in size, and associated with an intermittent stream or high salt marsh are considered of medium value. A low value is given to wetlands of low species diversity, small size, and isolated. These six functions are rated low, moderate, or high, based on the criteria outlined above. These criteria are guidelines compiled from Adamus (1987) and Reppert (1979) and professional judgment must be exercised in assessing these criteria. Overall values for a wetland are assigned, based on a synthesis of individual values. In addition to intrinsic functions, extrinsic functions are also recognized. These extrinsic functions provide social values that have indirect benefits to wetlands. Education and recreational opportunities are most often mentioned as extrinsic functions. Associated values are often subjective and are thus difficult to evaluate. As such, these functions are not rated, but are nonetheless important when considering creation, restoration, or enhancement projects. ONSITE WETLAND VALUATION Following the function and value assessment process noted above Wetland A was rated as exhibiting a low rating: o Water Quality Benefits -This wetland was small, isolated, and had been impacted by prior forest harvest and clearing. This wetland appeared to retain less than 25% of the runoff which occurred within the local area. This wetland also exhibited a limited vegetation density as a result of prior forest harvest and grading. The primary water quality benefit provided by this wetland was a very limited amount of biofiltration of surface stormwater. o Stormwater Storage -This wetland appeared within a topographic depression and had been impacted by prior land uses. This wetland was located in a rapidly developing part of King County. This wetland was small and exhibited a very limited ability to store stormwater. Evendell -8 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o Hydrologic Support -This wetland appeared small, isolated, and to pond a limited amount of surface water early in the growing season. Evidence of seasonal ponding and saturation to the surface was limited. o Groundwater Recharge -This wetland appeared small, isolated, and to pond a limited amount of surface water early in the growing season. Evidence of seasonal ponding and saturation to the surface was limited. o Natural Biological Function -This wetland was small, isolated, and exhibited a very limited range of plant diversity and vegetation complexity. Available habitat was dominated to young deciduous trees and a dense shrub community. Unique habitat features (i.e. snags, fallen trees, mature trees along the wetland boundary) were absent. This wetland included a large slash pile resulting from prior forest harvest. ONSITE EVALUATION -WILDLIFE WILDLIFE STUDY METHODS The onsite assessment of wildlife species presence and available wildlife habitats was completed as a part of the onsite assessment of wetland characteristics. This assessment included both early morning and late afternoon observations. Species presence and habitat utilization were evaluated following the methods identified by Horner and Raedeke (1989) and within U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Publication 80/58 (Mikol, 1980). In addition, the King County Wildlife Study Guidelines (Draft Wildlife Management in King County, Issue Paper, 1993) were also followed to assure consistency with the King County permit process and documentation of habitat types. Onsite activities documented observations of individual species presence, the general location of the species sighting, and the life history activity being undertaken. Sample stations were established within the site for these observations. This range of observations were documented because for many of the smaller, less mobile species (i.e. small mammals, amphibians) the project site may provide all of their life history requirements (nesting, cover, feeding, and reproduction) while for the more mobile species (i.e. waterfowl, songbirds, medium sized mammals) the project site may be used for only a few of the life history requirements. These more mobile species may depend more upon adjacent habitat for more critical habitat needs such as nesting and cover from predators. It is unlikely based upon the existing site conditions, coupled with adjacent land uses, that species which require large areas of undisturbed habitat would exist onsite. Evendell -9 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ONSITE HABITAT TYPES The site exhibited one primary habitat type that had been manipulated as a part of past land use activities. An upland coniferous forest plant community dominated this primary habitat type. This plant community had been retained following prior forest harvest activities. Included within this primary habitat type were two additional habitat types. As defined by King County, the "habitat type" best represented within the site was "Conifer Upland Forest -low understory." The primary tree within this habitat type is Douglas fir that is 80 to 200 years old with a well developed understory. One additional habitat type was Persistent Lowland shrub. This upland habitat type has been manipulated and modified by prior forest harvest activities. In parcel B, and in the southern portion of parcel A, the areas were developed into active pastures, and qualify as Agricultural lands under the County designation. The adjacent properties also exhibited similar land use actions along with the development of single family homesites. The "deciduous forested wetland" habitat type was identified as present within the central drainage corridor (Wetland A). This habitat type had also been impacted by prior forest harvest activities and adjacent land uses. This habitat type included young deciduous trees (i.e. red alder, black cottonwood, Oregon ash, Pacific willow) and a wide variety of shrubs and herbs (i.e. Douglas spiraea, salmonberry, willows, sedges, rushes, reed canarygrass, lady fern, buttercup). PRIMARY HABITAT TYPES INCLUDED MINOR HABITAT TYPES Conifer Upland Forest Deciduous Forested wetland -low understorv Aoricultural Lands Persistent Lowland Shrub PLANT AND ANIMAL SPECIES OBSERVATIONS Conifer Upland Forest: The majority of the 14-acre project site was identified to be dominated by a coniferous upland forest plant community. Total crown cover exceeded 60 percent. The primary tree species was Douglas fir that had been retained following prior forest harvest. Additional tree species include Western hemlock, big leaf maple, western red cedar, hawthorn, cascara, black cottonwood, and red alder. The understory was dense and composed of a wide variety of shrubs and herbaceous species. Avian species observed within this coniferous upland forest habitat type included tree swallow (Tachycineta bico/or), song sparrow (Melospiza melodia), dark eyed junco (Junco hyemalis), American crow (Corvus brachynchos), American robin (Turdus migratorius), golden crown kinglet (Regulus satrapa), bushtit (Psaltriparus minimus), house finch (Passer domesticus), Steller's jay (Cyanocitta stellert), pine siskin (Cardue/is pinus), black-capped chickadee (Parus atricapil/us), brown creeper (Certhia americana), ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbel/us), varied thrush (/xoreus naevius), rufous sided towhee (Pipilo erythrophtha/mus), Northern flicker (Colaptes auratus), and hairy woodpecker (Picoides viflosus). These avian species were feeding throughout this Evendell -10 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I : I I I I I I I I habitat type with the greatest number of observations noted along the edge between this upland forested habitat type and the mixed wetland areas. This habitat type also appeared to provide cover to many species that also used the adjacent areas, particularly the residential areas. A number of nests were observed onsite and appeared to have been used during the 2000 breeding season. A limited number of stumps and snag trees are present within this plant community. These stumps and snags appeared well utilized as feeding areas by a wide variety of avian species, particularly hairy woodpeckers, creepers, and Northern flicker. A few of these snags also exhibited a limited use by pileated woodpecker (Drpocopus pileatus). Mammal species observed within this habitat type included deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus), shrew (Sorex spp.), opossum (Didelphis virginianus), Douglas squirrel (Tamiasciurus douglasi1), mountain beaver (Aplodontia rufa), raccoon (Procyon lotoi), and black tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Freshwater Deciduous Wetland: A deciduous wetland area was identified to pass generally from north to southeast through the northeastern portion of the project site. This wetland represented less than 5% of the total project area, had been greatly modified by prior forest harvest activities, and was dominated by a young mixed forest composed of red alder, black cottonwood, and Pacific willow trees. Crown cover exceeded 50% in some areas where dense thickets of sapling red alder trees, Douglas spiraea, and salmonberry dominated. The northern portion of this area had been cleared and graded and was dominated by herbaceous species. This grading has enhanced an existing swale that ran through the property. Avian species observed within this freshwater wetland habitat type included tree swallow, violet green shallow (Tachycineta thal/assina), barn shallow (Hirundo rustica), song sparrow, dark eyed junco, American crow, American robin, golden crown kinglet, house finch, Steller's jay, pine siskin, black-capped chickadee, rufous sided towhee, Northern flicker, pileated woodpecker, and hairy woodpecker. These avian species were noted to use the "edge" between the mixed wetland habitat type and the upland young conifer forest habitat type. Many of these avian species were feeding, nesting, and seeking cover either within the forested portions of this wetland habitat type or within the adjacent upland forest plant community. This wetland plant community included a number of downed logs and a slash pile. These habitat features were noted as heavily used as feeding areas, cover, and perches. A number of small cavities were also noted to be used by swallows. Mammal species observed within this habitat type included deer mice, opossum, black tailed deer, and raccoon. Evendell -11 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ••• I I I I Pacific tree frogs (Hy/a regil/a) were also noted within this habitat type. As identified the apparent length of surface water ponding resulting from water retention by the wetland would be inadequate to provide spawning habitat for this species. MOVEMENT CORRIDORS As identified by onsite wildlife trials, small and medium size mammals appeared to be moving throughout the project site and into the adjacent areas. The larger of these trails (many of which are logging roadways and draglines) also appeared to be used by domestic cats, domestic dogs, horses, and neighbors. Wetland A also appeared to serve as a movement corridor for a wide variety of wildlife species. PRIORITY SPECIES Two wildlife species identified by the State of Washington as "Priority Species" were observed onsite during this assessment. Black tailed deer and ruffed grouse are noted by the State of Washington as a "priority species" because these species are regulated as "game" species. The project site may also provides suitable habitat for other game species such as mourning dove (Zenaida marroura) and band-tailed pigeon (Columba fasciata). STATE CANDIDATE SPECIES A single "State Candidate" species -the pileated woodpecker -was observed to utilize the forested wetland area along with the adjacent upland forested areas onsite. State candidate species are presently under review by the State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) for possible listing as endangered, threatened, or sensitive. WDFW has developed a list of recommendations for management of the pileated woodpecker that focused on the preservation.of nesting habitat. As defined by WDFW the most popular nest trees are typically hard snags with bark and broken tops within riparian areas. REGULATORY CONSIDERATION The proposed alteration of lands defined by various federal, state, and local authority rules and regulations as "wetlands" raises environmental concerns that are generally addressed in the development review process. These concerns center around the development's potential adverse impacts to the structure, function, value, and size of these "wetland" areas. Such adverse impacts may include a reduction in wildlife habitats, reduced surface water quality, reduced water retention, a reduced ground water recharge rate, reduced plant species diversity, and the reduction in the function and value of other associated wetland and non-wetland characteristics. ( Evendell -12 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS -Section 404 Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) prohibits the discharge of dredged or fill material into "Waters of the United States" without a permit from the Corps of Engineers (Corps). The Corps has jurisdiction over freshwater systems waterward from the ordinary high water line of a water body or waterward from the upland boundary of the adjacent wetland. The definition of fill materials includes the replacement of aquatic areas with dry land, grading which changes the surface contour of a wetland, and mechanized land clearing in wetlands. For the purposes of Section 404 permitting the Corps makes the final determination as to whether an area meets the wetland definition and would be subject to regulation under the Corps program. Currently the Corps has two specific types of permits which apply to wetland fill proposals. These two types are a series of specific Nationwide Permits and the Individual Permit. The Nationwide Permit process identifies specific categories of work that can be undertaken following a set of specific conditions applicable to each Nationwide Permit number. For example; NWP#12 allows for the limited, short term impacts to wetlands for the placement of utilities, and NWP#14 allows for a limited impact to wetlands as a part of the development of a roadway crossing. The Corps has noted several times within information papers, documents, and workshops that a project proponent that places fill within a wetland without specific Corps authorization does so at the proponent's own risk. The Corps requires an Individual Permit where a proposed activities within an identified jurisdictional wetland area can not be authorized under one of the Nationwide Permits. Within the Individual Permit process the Corps undertakes a much more in- depth review of the proposed project and the proposed impacts. The Corps must evaluate whether the benefits derived from the project outweigh the foreseeable environmental impacts of the project's completion. KING COUNTY -"Environmentally Sensitive Areas" Ordinance 21A.24 o Wetland and Stream Classes King County regulates activities in and around wetland areas. Such regulations also require that an undisturbed native vegetation buffer be retained along the upland side of the identified wetland areas. To assist in this regulation the County has defined classes by which to regulate wetlands, streams, and their associated buffer area. These categories are based on such features as size; the presence of endangered or threatened plants, fish, or animals; regionally rare wetlands; wetlands of local significance for wildlife or stormwater functions; the number of wetland classes and subclasses; and percentage of open water. A Class 1 Wetland means a wetland assigned the Unique/Outstanding rating in the King County Wetlands Inventory, or any wetland which meets any of the following criteria: Evendell -13 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' .• I I I 1. The presence of species listed by the federal government or state as endangered, or threatened, or the presence of critical or outstanding actual habitat for those species; 2. Wetlands having 40% to 60% permanent open water in dispersed patches with two or more classes of vegetation; 3. Wetlands equal to or greater than ten acres in size and having three or more wetland classes, one of which is open water; or 4. The presence of plant associations of infrequent occurrence. A Class 2 Wetland means a wetland assigned the Significant #2 Rating in the King County Wetlands Inventory; or any wetlands which meet any of the following criteria: 1. Wetlands greater that one acre in size; 2. Wetlands equal to or less that one acre in size and having three or more wetland classes; 3. Wetlands equal to or less than one acre that have a forested wetland class; 4. The presence of heron rookeries or raptor nesting trees. A Class 3 Wetland means a wetland assigned a Lesser Concern #3 Rating in the King County Wetlands Inventory, 1983, or uninventoried wetlands that area equal to or less than one acre in size and that have two or fewer wetland classes.· A Class 3 Stream means those streams that are intermittent or ephemeral during years of normal rainfall and are not used by salmonids. o Wetland/Stream Alteration King County allows a limited amount of alterations to wetlands provided all impacts are mitigated pursuant to an approved mitigation plan. For example, on a site larger than 20 acres in size, up to three isolated wetlands may be altered by combining their functions into one or more replacement wetlands pursuant to an approved mitigation plan (21A.24.330.K). The County defines an "isolated wetland" as those Class 3 Wetlands whose total size is less than 2,500 square feet and which area hydrologically isolated from other wetlands or streams. o Roadway Improvements King County will allow a roadway to cross a wetland or associated buffer where the following are met (21A.24.330.N): 1. King County determines that no alternative access is practical; 2. all crossings minimize impact to the wetland and provide mitigation for unavoidable impacts through restoration, enhancement, or replacement of disturbed areas; Evendell -14 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3. crossings do not change the overall wetland hydrology; 4. crossings do no diminish the flood storage capacity of the wetland; and 5. all crossings are constructed during summer low water periods. o Required Buffers King County has established a standard buffer to be applied to a wetland or stream to assure protection of the wetland function and value. This buffer area is measured perpendicular to the defined wetland edge or perpendicular to the identified ordinary high water mark of a stream. WETLAND CLASS STANDARD BUFFER WIDTH 1 100 feet 2 50 feet 3 25 feet King County allows the standard buffer to be modified where such actions would provide additional protection to wetlands or enhance the wetland's functions (21A.24.320.B). Buffer averaging may be allowed as long as the total area contained in the buffer on the development proposal site does not decrease and the minimum width of the final buffer is not less than 65% of the standard buffer width. SELECTED ACTION PLAN The Selected Action Plan of the Evendell Residential Community focuses on the creation of independent lots suitable for the development of single-family homesites consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan. An essential element of this process is the development of access roadways and utility corridors which both meet King County health and safety standards and meet the goal of avoidance and minimization of potential short-term or long-term adverse impacts to aquatic environments. A primary feature in the creation of these homesite lots will be the establishment of a protective buffer adjacent to the identified onsite wetland consistent with the King County Environmental Sensitive Areas Ordinance. The creation of these homesite lots will not require the adverse impact or placement of fill within identified wetland areas. To provide additional protection for the onsite wetland, the buffer in the northwest corner will be increased by the addition of 15,495 square feet. Through averaging, the buffer on the west side of the wetland will be reduced to 32.5 feet, a total of 9,340 square feet. Through buffer averaging these unavoidable intrusions into the standard buffer areas will be fully compensated and will not adversely impact the adjacent wetland areas. The development of this residential community will require the creation of a public roadway access by extending the existing 1581h Avenue South roadway which presently Evendell -15 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ends at Southeast 135th. In addition, site development requires improvements to the existing right-of-way (SE 1361h Street -a primary collector route for the area) which fronts the project along its northern boundary. This will require the unavoidable filling of the northern 200 square feet of Wetland A and the reduction of the buffer associated with this area of the wetland by 4,649 square feet. Through restoration of the existing onsite wetland, additional of buffer area along the eastern side of Wetland A, and onsite erosion protections these unavoidable intrusions into the wetland and standard buffer areas will be fully compensated and will not adversely impact the remaining wetland area. ELEMENTS OF THE COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN Site planning for the Evendell Residential Community project site has focused on the mandated hierarchy of wetland impact reduction: 1) avoidance, 2) minimization, and 3) compensation. These avoidance and minimization strategies included a site design to reduce impacts to onsite wetland systems. The total amount of wetland area to be unavoidably modified by this project equals 200 square feet. As compensation for this unavoidable impact to Wetland A resulting from the development of SE 1361h Street approximately 4,000 square feet of existing degraded wetland area will be enhanced through the planting of native trees and shrubs. The presently degraded buffer adjacent to the restored wetland area will also be restored and enhanced. Through buffer averaging the final protective buffer will be established to ensure that there is no reduction in the total area of buffer onsite and that the final buffer enhances the onsite wildlife habitats and greater long-term protection of the wetland. PROJECT ELEMENT IDENTIFIED IMPACT Reduction of the standard 50 9,340 sqft of buffer foot buffer along the western eliminated edge of Wetland A to 32.5 feet. Elimination of 4,649 square 4,649 sqft of buffer feet of buffer along the eliminated northern edge of Wetland A to develop SE 135th Street. Elimination of 200 square feet 200 sqft of wetland of buffer along the northern eliminated edae of Wetland A to develoo COMPENSATION PROVIDED 10,000 square feet of buffer will be added to the eastern side of Wetland A. This addition of buffer will provide greater protection to the wetland through the addition of mature trees and a very dense vegetation communitv 5,495 square feet of buffer will be added to the eastern side of Wetland A. This addition of buffer will provide greater protection to the wetland through the addition of mature trees and a very dense vegetation communitv The existing degraded part of Wetland A onsite will be enhancement with the olantina of native trees and shrubs. Evendell -16 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SE 1361h Street. DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PROGRAM 1. As compensation for the unavoidable impact to 200 square feet of onsite King County Class 2 Wetland a presently degraded area of wetland adjacent the existing homesite equal to 4,000 square feet will be restored. Wetland restoration will be accomplished through the planting of native trees and shrubs. In addition, site design will ensure that there will be no adverse changes in the existing wetland hydrology patterns (Attachment 1 ). 2. The buffer associated with the identified onsite wetland will be established and identified onsite. The width of the protective buffer area shall be averaged so the total square footage surrounding the buffer does not decrease and that additional protection to the wetland is provided. Along the western buffer boundary the buffer width will be reduced to 65% of the standard buffer width for a Class 2 Wetland, to 32.5 feet as measured perpendicular for the identified wetland boundary. For the eastern buffer boundary, the buffer width will be increased to a maximum of 100 feet, and will encompass the entire corner to the project site. Once identified the wetlands and associated buffers will not be adversely modified by future land use actions. 3. As a part of the development of the required roadway improvements the actual encroachment into buffer area of Wetland A will be held to the minimum necessary to meet County roadway requirements along the SE 1361h Street Corridor. Following placement of the roadway improvements the roadway side slope within the buffer areas will be seeded with the defined grass seed mixture (Attachment 1). 4. As compensation for the unavoidable encroachment into the buffer associated with Wetland A as a part of the development of SE136th Street the standard buffer along the east side of this wetland will be increased. This buffer width increase is designed enhance the wetland's function through improved visual and auditory blockage from the street crossing and greater wildlife habitat opportunities. 5. As a part of the development of the required roadway improvements the actual encroachment into buffer area of Wetland A will be held to the minimum necessary to meet County roadway requirements along the SE 1361 h Street Corridor. Following placement of the roadway improvements the roadway side slope within the buffer areas will be seeded with the defined grass seed mixture (Attachment 1 ). 6. All onsite activities will be monitored by the onsite biologist. The onsite biologist shall identify planting locations and planting patterns within the restored wetland and buffer.. Following the completion of onsite planting activities a "record-drawing" plan will be prepared and submitted to King County. A five-year monitoring program will be undertaken to assure the success of the compensatory mitigation plan. A project Evendell -17 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I financial guarantees will also be implemented to assure that the proposed work is completed and is successful. 7. Temporary and long-term erosion control measures will be implemented. These measures include silt fencing during site preparation and wetland construction, and seeding of exposed soil areas. 8. The outer boundary of the wetland buffer will be marked and fenced to limit intrusion into these areas. GOAL AND OBJECTIVE OF THE MITIGATION PLAN The GOAL of the Compensatory Mitigation Plan is to fully compensate for the unavoidable adverse impact to 200 square feet of wetland area and to enact a buffer averaging program that provides greater protection to the onsite wetland. This wetland area meets the criteria for designation as a King County Class 2 Wetland and presently exhibits a low function and value rating. The proposed restored wetland area will be within with the northern portion of Wetland A will provide full compensation for unavoidable project impacts while also enhancing the function and value of the wetland. Upon the completion of this mitigation plan there will be no net loss of King County regulated wetland functions or values, an increase in the potential for the buffer to protect aquatic habitats, and an increase in the potential to provide long- term protection of wetland and buffer areas through an enhancement of a degraded wetland. To achieve the defined GOAL, the following OBJECTIVES are defined: • Plant Community Structure A. The enhanced compensatory mitigation wetland area will total 4,000 square feet and will exhibit a scrub/shrub and sapling tree vegetation classes within five years following initial planting (palustrine, scrub/shrub, seasonally flooded -PSSC). • Natural Biological Attributes B. The compensatory mitigation wetland and the associated buffer will include the placement of snags and downed logs which provide nesting and cover habitat for passerine birds common to the area within five years. PERFORMANCE CRITERIA Evendell -18 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I To establish whether the defined project OBJECTIVES have been met by the wetland mitigation plan, the following PERFORMANCE CRITERIA have been established to apply to the compensatory mitigation wetland area. Objective A. The compensatory mitigation wetland area will total 4,000 square feet in size and will exhibit scrub/shrub and sapling vegetation classes within five years following initial planting (palustrine, scrub/shrub, seasonally flooded -PSSC). Performance Criteria: As defined by Canopy Coverage Method sampling (0.25 m2 plot frame) the emergent plant community within the 4,000 square feet of the compensatory mitigation wetland area will exhibit at least an 80% coverage within five years following initial planting. As defined by Line- intercept Method sampling the scrub/shrub and sapling vegetation class will exhibit at least a 50% aerial coverage within five years following initial planting in those areas not identified as open water. Performance Criteria: At the end of the first growing season 100% of the installed trees and shrubs will be alive and exhibit growth. Those species identified as dead will be replaced prior to the start of the second growing season. Performance Criteria: At the end of the fifth growing season 80% of the trees and shrubs (species combined) will be alive and exhibit growth. Objective B. The compensatory mitigation wetland and the associated buffer will include the placement of snags and downed logs which provide nesting and cover habitat for passerine birds common to the area within five years. Performance Criteria: A minimum of three (3) stumps (minimum 10 feet in length, minimum 20 inch diameter at the top, minimum 10 foot diameter at bottom of rootball) and a minimum of three (3) downed logs (minimum 20 feet in length, minimum 20 inch diameter at 10 feet above root collar, minimum 10 foot diameter at bottom of rootball) will be placed within the compensatory mitigation area to provide habitat for passerine birds common to the area. (Appendix B). Performance Criteria: The compensatory mitigation area will be used for cover by at least two species of passerine birds common to the area within five years of completion of construction of the mitigation area. This will be monitored through observations and photographs of individual birds and habitat utilization. MITIGATION REPLACEMENT/ENHANCEMENT Evendell -19 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The selected mitigation area will make an improvement to the functions and values offered by the existing onsite wetland and buffer while also providing a wider range of functions and values not presently exhibited onsite. Primary features offered by the selected mitigation plan includes a higher functioning wetland area, greater water quality protection to downstream resources, greater opportunity for biofiltration of surface water, greater water storage capacity, greater diversity of plant species and plant community associations, greater diversity of wildlife habitats. Overall, the proposed mitigation plan will provide a higher quality and a wider range of functions and values per unit area that presently exiting onsite within Wetland A. The proposed mitigation plan offers the opportunity to replace existing low function wetland with an area of greater functions and values. In addition, provisions will be put into place that will allow for the long-term protection and preservation of the entire wetland mitigation area, together with monitoring to ensure that the plant communities and wetland hydrology features are established. SUMMARY TABLE OF WETLAND FUNCTIONAL BENEFITS MITIGATION ELEMENT WETLAND FUNCTION BENEFITS Establishment of a diverse plant community 0 Natural Biological Function and habitat features within the wetland and 0 Water Quality buffer areas. Enhancement of the mitigation wetland area 0 Hydrologic Support through selective site excavation. 0 Stormwater & Floodwater Storage 0 Water Quality 0 Natural Biological Function 0 Groundwater Recharae Removal and management of invasive 0 Water Quality soecies. 0 Natural Bioloaical Function Use of temporary and long-term erosion 0 Water Quality control technoloav. SELECTED PLANT COMMUNITIES The plant communities and plants selected for the created wetland and restored/ enhanced wetland and buffer areas will be obtained as nursery stock. These selected species are native and commonly occur in the local area. The plant species are selected to increase plant diversity, match present onsite communities, increase wildlife habitats, and enhance the aquatic environment. NUMBER COMMON NAME LOCATION SCIENTIFIC NAME 20 Western red cedar (THP) Wetland and Thuia o/icata buffer PROPOSED PROPOSED INDICATOR SPACING locl SIZE STATUS 12-15ft 5 ft height FAC minimum Evendell -20 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 20 Sitka spruce (PIS) Wetland and 12-15ft 5 ft height FAG Picea sitchensis buffer minimum 10 Oregon ash (FRL) Wetland 10 -15 ft 4 ft height FAGW Fraxinus latifolia minimum 20 Black twinberry (LOI) Wetland and 4 ft 2 gal FAG+ Lonicera involucrata buffer 20 Pacific ninebark (PHC) Wetland 4 ft 2 gal FACW- Phvsocarous caoitatus 20 Red-osier dogwood (COS) Wetland 4 ft 2 gal FACW Gornus stolonifera 20 Salmonberry (RUS) Wetland 4 ft 2 gal FAG+ Rubus soectabilis 20 Sitka willow (SAS) Wetland 10-15ft 2 gal FACW Sa/ix sitchensis SEEDING MIXTURES Wetland Area Soil Moisture Conditions Common name Scientific name percent bv wei!lht Redtoo Aarostis alba 50% Water foxtail Alooecurus oeniculatus 50% apply at the rate of 120 pounds per acre Upland Buffer Area Soil Moisture Conditions Common name Scientific name percent bv weiQht Colonial bentarass Aarostis tenuis 15% Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea 40% Perennial rvearass Lo/ium oerenne 30% Greeoina red fescue Festuca rubra 15% apply at the rate of 120 pounds per acre CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION Essential to the success of the compensatory mitigation plan is the accurate inspection of onsite activities immediately prior to and during the construction phase. These activities include pre-construction site inspection, onsite inspection and technical direction during construction and planting activities, and post-construction site inspection and evaluation. The pre-construction site inspection allows the project proponent and the project biologist to evaluate and, if necessary, adjust the onsite construction steps. These steps include analysis of project site elevation features, project sequencing and timing, final grade analysis, unforeseen required minor modifications to the original establishment plan, and the establishment of environmental protections (silt fences, etc.) required during construction. Interaction with King County wetland staff is also an Evendell -21 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I essential element during pre-construction site inspections and discussions. Onsite technical inspection during construction and planting activities will be implemented by the combined efforts of the project biologist and King County wetland staff. The project biologist will perform construction oversight and address minor unforeseen construction difficulties to assure that the intent of the buffer establishment plan is met. The project biologist shall also be responsible for assuring that the species and sizes of native plants selected and noted within the final planting plan are utilized during construction. The project biologist shall also be responsible for the placement of all trees and shrubs. If selected native species become unavailable, the project biologist will consult with King County wetland staff for substitute plant species to assure that the intent of the stream buffer establishment plan is met. Post-construction site inspection/ evaluation will include the preparation of a "record-drawings" which will be submitted to King County wetland staff. WATER QUALITY PROTECTIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION The project team will implement a wide range of water quality protective measures during and immediately following the construction of the compensatory mitigation area. This protective measures include the placement of appropriate silt fencing along the outer boundary of the buffer area to be established, short-term silt fencing adjacent to the specifically identified wetland and buffer excavation areas, work during the drier season of the year, the use of well maintained machinery, the seeding/mulching of all exposed soil surfaces within two weeks from the final completion of site excavation, and the irrigation of the wetland and buffer areas to ensure plant community establishment. In addition, best management practices as identified within the erosion control plan prepared for this project site will be used during the entire construction phase to protect water quality. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE T~SK APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMPLETION Initial onsite team meeting to define final construction steps September 30, 2001 and project team tasks. On site marking of wetland creation area and outer buffer October 15, 2001 boundaries. Placement of protective silt fencing and other erosion protections as needed. Plantino of wetland and buffer areas. Final construction report PROJECT MONITORING November 15, 2001 November 30, 2001 Evendell • 22 Wetland/Wildlife Report • 00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Following the successful completion of the proposed compensatory mitigation plan a five-year monitoring and evaluation program will be undertaken. The purpose of this program is to assure the success of the selected mitigation as measured by an established set of performance criteria (see above). This monitoring will also provide valuable information on the effectiveness of mitigation procedures. STANDARDS OF SUCCESS Vegetation Sampling Methodology and Monitoring Schedule Permanent vegetation sampling plots will be located within each planting community in areas representative of the communities being sampled. These sampling plots will be located along specific transects and at stationary identified points. Observations and measurements will be recorded for all plant species in order of dominance based on the relative percent cover for each species within the various vegetation strata. Sampling for tree and shrub species will be completed in 30-foot radius sampling plots. Stratified methods will be used to increase the precision of sampling data while also maintaining elements necessary for statistical inferences. The evaluation of the success of the enhancement program will be based on the expected cover percentages to be defined within the final compensatory mitigation plan and the selected 80% survival rate at the end of the fifth growing season following initial planting. The percent of aerial cover and the percent survival rate will be based on combined counts of existing and planted species during vegetation monitoring. Sample location will be shown on the design and the "record drawings" plans, and will correspond to identified photo points. Trees and shrubs will be visually evaluated to determine the rate of survivorship, health, and vigor of each plant. The categories to be used will include live, stressed, tip dieback, basal sprouts, not found, apparently dead, and dead. Vegetation Monitoring 1. Upon the completion of initial planting and as a part of each monitoring period the project biologist will count the number of plants which were planted within the wetland and buffer areas. Plants will be identified to species and observations of general plant condition (i.e., plant health, amount of new growth) are to be recorded for each plant. 2. At identified sample plots within the created wetland and the enhanced buffer areas the project biologist will. determine percent coverage of vegetation using the Canopy Coverage Method sampling (0.25 m2 plot frame) procedure for emergent species and by using the Line-intercept Method sampling procedure for the scrub/shrub and sapling tree species. 3. Within the entire mitigation area the project biologist will count the number of undesirable invasive plants and estimate the aerial coverage (as if the observer Evendell -23 Wetland/Wildlife Report • 00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I were looking straight down from above) of these invasive plants. Undesirable plants include blackberries, Scot's broom, tansy ragwort, reed canarygrass, and other such plants listed in the Washington State Noxious Weed List. 4. Within the entire mitigation area the project biologist will count the number of desirable "volunteer" plants and estimate the aerial coverage of these plants. 5. The project biologist will take photographs that show the entire mitigation area. During the five-year monitoring period photos will be taken in the same direction and at the same location to provide a series of photos. These photos will show plant growth, plant species, and plant coverage. 6. Upon the completion of the initial project planting and upon the completion of each monitoring period the project biologist will prepare a report defining methods, observations, and results along with the date the observations were completed. Each report will be sent to King County wetlands staff. 7. The monitoring schedule is defined as: A. At the completion of initial project planting. This report will include a "record drawing" defining the species used, locations, and general site conditions. This report will also include a "lessons learned" section to assist in future monitoring and final project assessment. This "record drawing" and report will be provided to the County within two weeks after the completion of onsite planting. B. Twice a year for years one through three following the completion of initial onsite planting. For each monitoring year, onsite monitoring will be completed once early in the growing season (late March to mid-April) and once again near the end of the growing season (mid-September). For each onsite monitoring activity a report will be prepared and provided to the County within two weeks after the completion of onsite monitoring. C. Once a year for years four and five following the completion of initial onsite planting. For each monitoring year, onsite monitoring will be completed once near the end of the growing season (mid-September). A report will be prepared and provided to the County within two weeks after the completion of onsite monitoring. MONITORING YEAR YEAR-1 YEAR-2 YEAR-3 Vegetation Monitoring Sequencing VEGETATION MONITORING On or about April 15, 2002 on or about Sept. 15, 2002 On or about April 15, 2003 on or about Sept. 15, 2003 On or about Aoril 15, 2004 SUBMITTAL OF MONITORING REPORT Reoort due Mav 25, 2002 Reoort due Oct. 15, 2002 Reoort due Mav 25, 2003 Report due Oct. 15, 2003 Report due Mav 15, 2004 Evendell -24 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I on or about Sent. 15, 2004 Reoort due Oct. 15, 2004 YEAR-4 on or about Seot. 15, 2005 Report due Oct. 15, 2005 YEAR-5 on or about Seot. 15, 2006 Report due Oct. 15, 2006 The last monitoring report dated October 15, 2006 will include notification to the County biologist that the monitoring program has concluded and that County review and site inspection is required for project analysis and release of the financial guarantee. This final report will also include a "lessons learned" section to assist and final project assessment and to potentially assist in the evaluation other mitigation projects. WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS Observations of wildlife will coincide with the onsite activities undertaken as part of the Vegetation Monitoring Program. The onsite team will document the extent of bird species abundance, site utilization, nesting and feeding activities, and species diversity. In addition, documentation of terrestrial and aquatic reptiles, amphibians, and mammals observable without trapping will also be documented. Wildlife observations will be documented within the Vegetation Monitoring Reports noted above. VEGETATION MAINTENANCE PLAN Maintenance of the enhanced wetland and buffer plant communities may be required to assure the long-term health and welfare of the wetland's and buffer's environmental functions. Such maintenance would be identified during the monitoring period and undertaken only following discussion and coordination with King County wetland staff. The overall objective is to establish undisturbed plant communities that do not require maintenance. Activities may include, but are not limited to, the removal of invasive non-native vegetation and the irrigation of selected areas. Established maintenance activities include the removal of any trash within the wetland and buffer. Temporary irrigation will be established (if necessary) to ensure one-inch of water from June through September of the first year following installation of the plantings. The need for temporary irrigation of these areas during subsequent years will be defined during the spring monitoring period. REMOVAL OF INVASIVE NON-NATIVE VEGETATION As a contingency, should the removal of invasive non-native vegetation become necessary, the project proponent will contact King County wetland staff to establish and define specific actions to be taken. Resultant contingency plan activities will be implemented when the ongoing vegetation monitoring program indicates that plants listed in the Washington State Noxious Weed List, blackberries, Scot's broom, tansy ragwort, or reed canarygrass are becoming dominant in the community. Evendell -25 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CONTINGENCY PLAN As a contingency, should the proposed compensatory plan fail to meet the performance criteria, the project proponent will undertake required remedial actions. Where plant survival is the failing component, the project proponent will replant and assure the success of this second planting which would be held to the same standard of success as measured by threshold criteria and monitoring processes. Should additional remedial actions be required, the project proponent will meet with King County wetland staff to establish and define actions to be taken to meet the desired goal of this program. PLANTING NOTES All plant materials shall be native to the Puget Sound Region. The onsite biologist shall inspect plant materials to assure the appropriate plant schedule and plant characteristics are met. The project proponent shall warrant that all plants will remain alive and healthy for a period of one-year following completion of planting activities. The project proponent shall replace all dead and unhealthy plants with plants of the same specifications. FINANCIAL GUARANTEE Financial guarantee will be provided for this project to ensure project completion and performance. This guarantee is defined using the standard King County Bond Quantity Worksheet (Appendix B). Evendell-26 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 ------------------- c.afl li'!i'il n :i: :I: )!.i Zm 0 .... ~~ 0 c.afl Q -m ~ (n 'Ti Cl.II 11ml ,,. m CD C < "I CD -· n d:, ""' =i -· .. "( , / I w ;f~j"',/ UlJ .) N tit •; : I ... .A ,> .,,. u' .,, ·,,,.« .. · '• v.v rt1 ,v y:__ Oj :Z: !ir. , .. · 1 1: V;·'s'":-'"~-~ti,, '-' l?'. O Cl ',."""' .,.,..,,, •• , 'ri 'I* < "' ' .._. 'g It;; '" l!!ili,,, . '~"'-!> I' " I(: ~ 156TH 1 -,. AV ~ "l ~i~C,§)ls'l ,~··'-~iffs,rn P-~;-~ ··-·--14000 (/) 134/lD 1-3200--p,,;,,it,, "'· ·,,. ------. (/) W _ I ,,, .;D__________ ' .. · HiBfH·--t--· . o ,-. ? """ --w ' I AV SE SE ..... !158 HAV SE ~ ~~ ~ ~ -1-W:!i__ ~V ~ SE m >~ ':'l I-' ,-. "D rn ,-. w .i:. -, .i:. v, .i:. r -o w o -1:> l/1 N --l ,-. r I-' ,-. 60TH PL SE O -l 2 V> ~ v, -'"" ,! o O ~ 160TH .• AV 5 ~ SE ./ 61 ST A A -~----····1;;:-·-14200 --rrooo ,_, V, V, 13200 u, -----rw'i'JO ··---~ -' 1 Y SE ~ I·' w"' rn rn v, u, u, ,_, --,. -, I"" "' --l rn -o,:..~ \ .... ---I-' -l r sl • ¥." 0 , _ 16 )o a ~ _ AV _ --5L "64l1J Pl SE , ~ --,~"-" s, '-o O a O ,a I-----... . ... I-' -,,~ ' 165TH PL SE "ti~ ' '''. "<f:.-.".'"'·\ia,,·'. ~ -~ "' ,.. !.'IE> AV" : ----~---_.. ,.. e: '{I: ;zl. 'i~.:!i ,..... 164 H -1 Av-1 SE ~ 1 I 1661 H PL SE "° -·-·-· . ·. ~!, '-< :c ..... ---·· ----. ·-·-165n, Pl S , i> '!~, ;:I:: O'.J 14500 lr~t . i,f'i'A':, Vi rri T 166T ----AV----· --·sE .. • 1 u, 166TH p ik\'.<'\-n )!!!i<1, -~ ~ --,....1--------, --1 ~-----~..S. rn-.... _, . -~., ----°' I l'L CE ----•....• "" I • g; u, (/) . -· .... .ill. . ',""-'· It:;1, ' 1 8TH O -1 rn ~ 168TH AV-E 169TH 1-,;~1.,,.,,~.,1 SE r~---·----13400 ~~?nri S -~-\ \:::) ------. L..!i I > , ~t:--<<====~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i ' . ., \, i" ----....... .. !..--; -, '.~...r.l, i .~(\' :,' ,J.q•\L;.;.;:;:_--::::-:- i . . .... _ .'-I --~-:_: . :i; i'<t "I IHIAB9TA1' if'lcCIHNOlbOGi~S • ' ' ,, "\: ,,\ \ •,, -~-~ \ '· ' \ ,, -~"' ... ,, \ \'.)., ·'\';-\ \ ',\~ ', figure~ NWH 1ReS1tl>ll.81l"CC9 Mappoll'llg I I I I I I I I I I 1 • I I I I I I I I I I I I it" ...... I I I I J --·"· lHlABUTAif I ir~~HINiOlbOGO~$ I 13, -~ figll.llre 3 IJillHIS ~es@l!Jll1'«:e Mappill'ilg I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ... ,G: IHAB8ifA'f 'flf~HNOlOGOIES ,. ;.~· i:''.' .. -,,.'!'··· ''"' ,. ··:Jt\"· ,. ,, ., ., . , , . , . , . • • , . ,. : , . ' . • •. •. •. • •. • • .. • • • • ,. ,. a,a, • GD.a a :-,o, • • • .. ... •· • .... --- o·: a a, art, . •-;°' .. . :.a a·.a ·, • 0 • • • .. aa•aaaa; DD D· • a II"' a. • a a er a ··o:· .. . • . " . ] .... L .. · a-a a a -: • • · a· a G O · · a Do· .. ln .. .====: • 0 a. a. • • • • a, • • a lrigli.llre 4 Seo~ Mappirrog I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REFERENCE LIST Adamus, P.R., E.J. Clairain Jr., R.D. Smith, and R.E. Young. 1987. Wetland Evaluation Technique (WET); Volume II: Methodology, Operational Draft Technical Report Y-87, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Office of Biological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, FWS/OBS-79/31. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1, US army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. Hitchcock, C.L., A. Cronquist. 1977. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press. Seattle, Washington. Horner, R.R. and K.J. Raedeke. 1989. Guide for Wetland Mitigation Project Monitoring. Washington State Department of Transportation. contract number GC8286, task 6. King County Department of Natural Resources. 1993. DRAFT Wildlife Management in King County: Issue Paper. Mikol, S.A. 1980. Field Guidelines for Using Transects to Sample Nongame Bird Populations. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service publication FWS/OBS -80/58. Reppert, R.T., W. Sigleo, E. Stakhiv, L. Messman, and C. Meyers. 1979. Wetland Values -Concepts and Methods for Wetland Evaluation. Research Report 79-R1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soils Conservation Service. Soils Survey of King County Area Washington, Nov. 1973. Washington State Department of Ecology. 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Publication Number 96-94. Washington State Department of Fisheries, Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization, Volume 1., 1975 Evendell -28 Wetland/Wildlife Report -00062 I I SAMPLE PLOT SP1 _.;;.;..;.. ______ _ DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL) I Project/Site Applicant/OWner: ..;:;Ev,:.;e;.;;n~de;:.;1:..1 -----------------Date: 17 July 2000 ...;;,M:;.;r.~M;:;i~ke:;,;.:R::::omc.;;;;an;.;;o::...,... _______________ County: _P_i_erce~----I Investigator: ..:..:H::::ab:::i.::ta:!.t .:.Te:::c:::.h::.:n:::ol:::11:i:::es::..._ _______ __,______ State: Washington Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? I Is the area a potential Problem area? (If needed, explain on reverse) YES YES Community ID: Transect ID: Plot ID: SP1 I VEGETATION (Note those species observed to have morphological adaptations to wetlands with an*) Dominant Plant <>M~•ec: St=tum ln'"cator I Do~inant Plant Snecies I I 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Acer macrootivilum San. Corylus comuta Rubus snoctabllis Rubus nrocera Rubus lacinatus pteridlum anuilium Stratum lnrticator Tree FACU Shrub FACU Shrub FAC+ Shrub FACU Shrub FACU- Herb FACU 8. •------------Percent of Dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or 0% I FAC (except FAC-). Include species noted (*) as showing morphological adaptations to wetlands --------------------------1 Describe Morphological Adaptations: -------------------------~ Remarks: Near araded roadbed I HYDROLOGY I -Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): __ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage __ Aerial Photograph I other _25._ No Recorded Data Available I I I I I I FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Depth of Surface Water: o· Depth to Free Water Pit: o· Depth to Saturated Soil: o· Remarks: Deciduous forest Wetland Hydrology Indicators: ~ Inundated Saturated in upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands X-Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12" Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data other (Explain in Remarks) SAMPLE PLOT SP1 I I Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy Taxonomy (Subgroup):Dystric Entic Durochrepts ,,,---------Drainage Class: Field Observations I Profile Description: Confirm Mapped Type Yes No Depth I (inches) Matrix Color (Munsell Moist) Motue Colors (Munsell Moist) MotUe Texture, Concretions Horizon Abundance/Contrast Rhizospheres, etc. I 0-18 10 YR 3/3 None None Gravelly loam 1- Hydric Soll Indicators: Hlstosol Concretions ------High Organic Content in Surface Layer ------Organic Streaking Hlstic Epipedon ---Sulfidlc Odor I I ___ Probable Aquic Moisture Regime ___ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ---Reducing Conditions ___ Listed on National Hydric Soils List 1 __ :::::_G_1_e_yed_o_r_L_o_w_c_h_ro_m_a_c_o_1o_rs ________ ----______ Ot_h_er_(Exp--1-ai_n_in_R_em_ari<.s_) _____ _ Remartts: I Field indicators of hydric soil NOT present I WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytlc Vegetation Present? Hydric Soils Present? I Wetland Hydrology Present? I Remarks: WETLAND CRITERIA NOT MET Is this Sampling Point within a ~ Wetland? ~ • -=----,---=--:---:~---:---:-----,--------Area appears to drain well following seasonal storm events I I I I I I I SAMPLE PLOT _S;;;.;P...;2;__ ____ _ DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL) I Project/Site Applicant/Owner: ..;:;E,;.ve-;n.;;;d~e-11 .,,,..-----------------Date: -;,;;M.r.;.,;M;;;;i.;;;ke~R;,;;o.m:.;;;a~no:;.,,.---------------County: 17 July 2000 Pierce I Investigator: ...;.;H .. ab;;.;it..;;;at;...;.T ... ech=n:.;;;o;.;;log;a;.;;ies ________________ State; Washington I Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? Is the area a potential Problem area? (If needed, explain on reverse) YES~ YES~ Community 10: Transect 10: Plot 10: SP2 I VEGETATION (Note those species observed to have morphological adaptations to wetlands with an*) Dominant Plant i::necies Stratum Indicator I Dominant Plant Snocies Stra•um Indicator I I 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Sap. Pooulus trichocaroa Carex obnuma Juncus effusus Shrub FAC Herb OBL Herb FACW 8. I --=----,,----.,..-~-=-------, Percent of Dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or 100% I FAC (except FAC-). Include species noted(*) as showing morphological adaptations to wetlands --------------------------1 Describe Morphological Adaptations: ----------.,,..,.--,-,------'--------1 Remarks: swale depression on edae of homasite area I HYDROLOGY I -Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): __ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage __ Aerial Photograph other I 2.__N_o_R-ecorded Data Available I FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Depth of Surface Water: o· Depth to Free Water Pit: O" I Depth to Saturated Soil: o· Remarks: I Depressionionat swale on edge of cleared homesite Next to slash pile and root ball ...YY!!!and Hydrology Indicators: X X Inundated Saturated in upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits X-Drainage Patterns In Wetlands --Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 • X-Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data Other (Explain in Remarks) I SAMPLE PLOT SP 2 I Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy Taxonomy (Subgroup):Dystrlc Entic Durochrepts ,..,....--------Drainage Class: I Profile Description: Depth I (inches) Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors (Munsell Moist) Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type Yes No Mottle Texture, Concretions Abundance/Contrast Rhizospheres, etc. I 0-6 1 O YR 2/1 None None Gravelly loam _6-"'-'-1""8 _________ ..;.10;:_;_YR'-'-'4"-/1'------...:.1.c.O...:.YR..:..;..;3:.:./2=-----=-P.:.ro~m~·::.;'CJJ=m.::.m:.:.:o:.:.n;__ _ __:C~l::,ay,_l:.:o::,am""---- I- Hydric Soil Indicators: I Histosol X Concretions ----------Histic Eplpedon ___ High Organic Content in Surface Layer I Sulfldlc Odor ___ Organic streaking ::x::: Probable Aquic Moisture Regime ___ Listed on Local Hydrlc Solis List ---Reducing Conditions ___ Listed on National Hydric Soils List I ...,,,_:-x;_-___ G_1_ey_ed_o_r_L_ow_c_h_ro_m_a_c_o1_o_rs ________ -_-_-_-___ 0t_h_er_<_Ex_p_1_ai_n_in_R_e_m_arks_> _____ _ Remarks: I Field indicators of hydric soil present I WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soils Present? I Wetland Hydrology Present? NO NO NO Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland? I Remarks: .....;W:..:..:::cET.:.;LA=-::.N;,::D:...C::..:Rlc.::...:..TE=:Rlc..:::..;Ac.cMc..:;E;;.;;T _____________________ _ •~--,---,-,--~~--:-:--~-----Area appears to drain poorly following seasonal stonn events I I I I I I I SAMPLE PLOT SP 3 I Project/Site Applicant/OWner. I Investigator. DAT AF ORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL) Evendell Date: Mr. Mike Romano County: Habitat Technologies State: Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? YES YES NO NO Community ID: I Is the area a potential Problem area? (If needed, explain on reverse) Transect ID: Plot ID: --------- 17 July 2000 Pierce Washington SP3 I VEGETATION (Note those species observed to have morphological adaptations to wetlands with an") I I Dominant Plant S=cies 1. 2. Sao. Alnus rubra 3. Carex obnupta 4. Phalarts arundinacea 5. Salix sltchensls 6. 7. St""'um l""icator I Dominant Plant Snecies Stratum lndi ... "tOr Shrub FAC Herb OBL Herb FACW Scrub FACW 8. •~-------------. Percent of Dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or 100% I FAC (except FAC-). Include species noted (") as showing morphological adaptations to wetlands --------------------------1 Descrtbe Morphological Adaptations: --.-..---,----,--'"""'--.,,..-------------1 Remarks: swale depression on edge of homesite area I HYDROLOGY I -Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): __ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage __ Aerial Photograph Other I .JL""'N..,.o-,R""ecorded Data Available FIELD OBSERVATIONS: I Depth of Surface Water. Depth to Free Water Pit: I Depth to Saturated Soil: Remarks: o· o· o· I Depressionional swale on edge of cleared homeslte I I I Wetland Hydrology Indicators: -Inundated Saturated in upper 12" X Water Marks ---X-Drill Lines Sediment Deposits --X-Drainage Patterns In Wetlands Oxidized Root Channels In Upper 12 " --X-Water-Stained Leaves Local Soll Survey Data Other (Explain in Remarils) SAMPLE PLOT SP 3 I I I I Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy Taxonomy (Subgroup):Dystric Entic Durochrepts ---------Drainage Class: Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type Yes No Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color (Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors (Munsell Moist) Mottle Texture, Concretions (inches) Horizon Abundance/Contrast Rhizospheres, etc. I ~a 1- Hydric Soil Indicators: 10 YR 2/2 10 YR 3/4 None None None none ___ Histosol ___ Concretions Gravelly loam gravelly loam I I Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer ------Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking ---------Probable Aquic Moisture Regime ___ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ___ Reducing Conditions ___ Listed on National Hydric Soils List • -=-=::::_G_1_e_ye_d_o_r_L_o_w_c_h_ro_m_a_c_o_1o_rs ________ -----_: ___ ot_h_e_r (Exp __ i_ai_n_in_R_em-aoo._> _____ _ Remarks: I Field indicators of hydric soil not present I WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soils Present? I Welland Hydrology Present? Is this Sampling Point within a @ Wetland? I Remaoo.: ....;W~E=T;;;LA::;:.,..N=o,....c=m=T=E=Rl=A~N=o=r=-=M=E=T=--------------------- Sample plot on edge of defined wetland ·------------ I I I I I Area appears to drain well following seasonal storm events I I I SAMPLE PLOT SP 4 DAT AF ORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL) Evendell Date: ...,.,~..,,.,......,,,------------------ --------- 17 July 2000 Project/Site Applicant/Owner: I Investigator: ...,.,M_r .,.,M_i_k e_R_o m_a_n o _________________ County: _H_ab_it_a_t_T_ech_n_o""log.,.i""es-'----------------State: Pierce Washington I Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? Is the area a potential Problem area? (If needed, explain on reverse) YES YES NO NO Community ID: Transect ID: Plot ID: SP4 I VEGETATION (Note those species observed to have morphological adaptations to wetlands With an*) I Dominant Plant Soecies I I Dominant Plant Snor,85 1. 2. Sao. Alnus rubra 3. Carex obnuma 4. Phalaris arundinacea 5. 6. 7. Stratum Indicator Stratum Indicator Shrub FAC Herb OBL Herb FACW 8. •~-----------Percent of Dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or 100% I FAC (except FAC-). Include species noted (*) as showing morphological adaptations to wetlands --------------------------; Describe Morphological Adaptations: Remarks: swale depression on edge of homesite area I HYDROLOGY I -Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, orTide Gage --Aerial Photograph I --Other ..JL No Recorded Data AvaHable I FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Depth of Surface Water: o· Depth to Free Water Pit: o· I Depth to Saturated Soil: o· RemarkS: I Depressionional swale on edge of cleared homesite I I I ~and Hydrology Indicators: Inundated Saturated in upper 12" X Water Marks X-Drift Lines Sediment Deposits X-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 • X-Water-Stained Leaves Local Soll Survey Data -Other (Explain in Remarks) I SAMPLE PLOT SP 4 I I Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy Taxonomy {Subgroup):Oystric Entic Durochrepts Drainage C:,,1-ass-: ------- Field Observations Profile Description: Depth I {inches) Horizon Matrix Color {Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors {Munsell Moist) Confinn Mapped Type Yes No Mottle Texture, Concretions Abundance/Contrast Rhizospheres, etc. I 0-6 10 YR 2/1 None None Gravelly loam _6-_18"'-----------'-10c..Y..c.R;...c_c4/c..1'-------'-10"""'"Y-'-R'"3/"'2=-----'-P-'-ro~m'°.'"/co"""'m"'m"'o"'n'-----'C°'"la::.ycclc:.oa=:m.:..:.... __ _ I- Hydric Soil Indicators: I Hlstosol X Concretions ---------Histic Epipedon ___ High Organic Content in Surface Layer I _,,, __ Sulfldic Odor ___ Organic Streaking _x;.;;__ Probable Aquic Moisture Regime ___ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ___ Reducing Conditions ___ Listed on National Hydric Soils List • -=-:X::::_G_1_ey_e_d_o_r_L_ow_c_h_ro_m_a_c_o1_o_rs _______ :::_-_-_0_1_he_r_{Ex_p_1a_i_n_in_R_e_m_a_rks_) _____ _ Remarks: I Field Indicators of hydric soil present I I WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytlc Vegetation Present? Hydric Soils Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? I Remarks: WETLAND CRITERIA IIIIET NO NO NO Is this Sampling Point within a ~ Wetland? (~ •-=------=-~~--:--~c-----:-------Area appears to drain poorly following seasonal stonn events I I I I 1. I I I SAMPLEPLOT_S::..P...;5c....-----~ DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL) I Project/Site Applicant/Owner: ...;E;;;v;..;e;;;n:;;:d:::el::..1------------------Date: 17 July 2000 Pierce I Investigator: ~M~r-~M~ik:=;e::,R:..;o::;:m.:.:a::;n~o..,.. ______________ County: ...;H:..;a:::b::;it::;a::..t T.:.e;.:ch:;::::no:::l:;;s;i.;;es;:_ _______ ...,..~..-----State: Washington Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? I Is the area a potential Problem area? (If needed, explain on reverse) YES YES Community ID: Transect ID: Plot ID: SP5 I I VEGETATION (Note those species observed to have morphological adaptations to wetlands with an*) nnminant Plant s-ctes <>+ratum Indicator I Dominant C>lant S""cles Sl""um Indicator 1. 2. Alnus rubra Tree FAC 3. 4. I 5. Rubus orocera Shrub FACU 6. Rubus lacinatus Shrub FACU- 7. Pteridium aouillum Herb FACU 8. I ~------=----=---------. Percent of Dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or 25% I FAC (except FAC-). Include species noted (") as showing morphological adaptations to wetlands --------------------------1 Describe Morphological Adaptations: ...,,,.,...-.,..,..--..--------------------1 Remarks: Cleared homesite area I HYDROLOGY I -Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): __ Stream, Lake, or Trde Gage __ Aerial Photograph I Other -2L. No Recorded Data Available I I I I I I FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Depth of Surface Water: o· Depth to Free Water Pit: o· Depth to Saturated Soil: o· Remarks: Deciduous forest ~and Hydrology Indicators: Inundated _ Saturated in upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines -Sediment Deposits --Drainage Patterns in Wetlands --Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 " ~ Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data Other (Explain in Remarks) I I Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy Taxonomy (Subgroup):Dystric Entic Durochrepts SAMPLE PLOT _S;;.;P:,.;5;._ ____ _ Drainage Class: Field Observations I Profile Description: Confirm Mapped Type Yes No Depth I (Inches) Matrix Color (Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors (Munsell Moist) Mottle Texture, Concretions Horizon Abundance/Contrast Rhlzospheres, etc. 0-8 10 YR 2/2 None None 10 YR 2/2 10 YR 5/6 Faint/uncommon loam Gravelly loam 1 8-18 I- Hydric Soil Indicators: I Concretions ---Histosol Histic Epipedon ___ High Organic Content in Surface Layer ---Sulfidic Odor ___ Organic Streaking --- I ___ Probable Aquic Moisture Regime ___ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ___ Reducing Conditions ___ Listed on National Hydric Soils List • -=-:::::_G_t_ey_ed_o_r_L_ow_c_h_ro_m_a_c_o,_o_rs _______ :_-:_-___ Ot_he_r_(Exp __ ,a_i_n_in_R_e_m_a_rk_s_> _____ _ RemarkS: I Field indicators of hydric soil NOT present I WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soils Present? I Wetland Hydrology Present? I Remarks: WETLAND CRITERIA NOT MET YES YES YES Is this Sampling Point within a ~ Wetland? {_!!5!7 ·-,----.,..--:--:----=-=-:c:----:----:-:---.--------Area appears to drain well following seasonal storm events I I I I I I I I I Project/Site SAMPLE PLOT SP 8 DAT AF ORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL) Evendell Date: ...,.;....,.,;,,--:::----------------- --------- 17 July 2000 Pierce Applicant/Owner: I Investigator: _M;;,,;;.;r .,.,M_i""k e;;,.;.;R.;;;o m=a n.;.o~--------------County: _H;.;.;;;;ab.ita ___ t _Te"-ch=n .. ol"'o"'i"'es""---------,------State: Washington Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? Is the area a potential Problem area? (If needed, explain on reverse) YES YES Community ID: Transect ID: Plot ID: SP8 I I VEGETATION (Note those species observed to have morphological adaptations to wetlands with an*) Do 1inant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator I Dominant PIAO! Snecies Stratum lnrllcator I 1. 2. Sao. Popuius trichocarpa Shrub FAC 3. 4. Juncus effusus Herb FACW 5. Rubus lacinlatus Shrub FACU- 6. I 7. 8. •~----------~ Percent of Dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or 66% I FAC (except FAC-). Include species noted (*) as showing morphological adaptations to wetlands --------------------------1 Describe Morphological Adaptations: Remarks: ...,,.s"'ug'"'1h'"'t-d'"e-p1re-s-s'"io_n_o_n_ed...,.1a-,e-o""f"'h_o_m_e-s"'ite_a_re_a------------1 I HYDROLOGY I -Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage --Aerial Photograph I --Other _!._ No Recorded Data Available I FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Depth of Surface Water: o· Depth to Free Water Pit: o· I Depth to Saturated Soil: o· Remarks: I Slight depression on edge of cleared homesite Next to slash pile and root ball I I I Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Inundated = Saturated in upper 12" X Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 " ,r-Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data Other (Explain in Remarks) I I Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy Taxonomy (Subgroup):Dystric Entic Durochrepts SAMPLE PLOT .....;;.s .. Pa _______ _ Drainage Class: Field Observations I Profile Description: Confirm Mapped Type Yes No Depth Mottle Texture, Concretions Matrix Color (Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Rhizospheres, etc. I Onches) Horizon ------------ 10 YR 3/2 None None Gravelly loam I s-18 10 YR 4/3 None none loam I- I I Hydric Soil Indicators: ___ Histosol ___ Concretions ___ Hlstic Epipedon ___ High Organic Content in Surface Layer ___ Sulfidic Odor ___ Organic Streaking ___ Probable Aqulc Moisture Regime ___ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ___ Reducing Conditions ___ Listed on National Hydric Soils List I -=-=::::_G_1_e_ye_d_o_r_L_ow_c_h_ro_m_a_c_o_1o_rs ________ -_:_-_____ Ot_h_e_r (Ex--pl-ai_n_in_R_em-arks_> _____ _ Remarks: I Field indicators of hydric soil NOT p19sent I I WEn.AND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soils Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? ~ YES~ YES~ I Remarks: WETLAND CRITERIA NOT MET Is this Sampling Point within a .~ Wetland? ~ I ---.,....,..-~,--.,.----,-,-----,--------A re a appears to drain well following seasonal storm events I I I I I SAMPLE PLOT SP12 I I --------- I Project/Site Applicant/owner: I Investigator: DAT AF ORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL) Evendell Date: ----------------------_,.M_r ._M_i_k e ..... R_o m_a n_o _______________ County: __ H_ab_it_a_t_Te_ch_n_o1_091.._·_es _______________ State: Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? YES ~ YES@ Community ID: I Is the area a potential Problem area? (If needed, explain on reverse) Transect ID: Plot ID: 17 July 2000 Pierce Washington SP12 I VEGETATION (Note those species observed to have morphological adaptations to wetlands with an •1 Dominant plant Soecies I Dominant Plan+ Snactes I I 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Alnus rubra Rubus orocera Rubus lacinatus Pleridium aauilium Stratum lnd'""*or Stratum Indicator Tree FAC Shrub FACU Shrub FACU- Herb FACU 8. •~-----=--------, Percent of Dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or 25% I FAC (except FAC-). Include species noted(") as showing morphological adaptations to wetlands --------------------------1 Describe Morphological Adaptations: ...,,,.,..--,-,----,.,-.--------------------1 Remarks: Cleared homesite area I HYDROLOGY I -Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage --Aerial Photograph I --Other ~ No Recorded Data Available I I I I I I FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Depth of Surface Water: o· Depth to Free Water Pit: o· Depth to Saturated Soll: o· Remarks: Deciduous forest Wetland Hydrology Indicators: -Inundated Saturated In upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits --Drainage Patterns in Wetlands -Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 " Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data Other (Explain in Remarks) I I Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy Taxonomy (Subgroup):Dystrlc Entic Durochrepts SAMPLE PLOT ,...,s.;;;P;..1;.;;2;.,_ ____ _ Drainage Class: I Profile Description: Depth I (inches) Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell Moist} Mottle Colors (Munsell Moist} Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type Yes No Mottle Texture, Concretions Abundance/Contrast Rhizospheres, etc. I 0-4 1 O YR 3/2 None None Gravelly loam -4-.:;....;1-=-e---------.;.10;..,:,Y:,;Rc.:4:::/3;..-----..;.N::.:o::.:n.::.e _____ -=,N.;.:o:.::n""e--------=1:::oa:.=m=:,..:;=c:....-- 1- I Hydrtc Soil Indicators: Histosol ---Histic Epipedon ---Sulfidic Odor Concretions ------High Organic Content in Surface Layer ___ Organic Streaking I ___ Probable Aquic Moisture Regime ___ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ___ Reducing Conditions ___ Listed on National Hydric Soils List 1 __ :::::_G-le_y_ed_o_r_L_ow_c_h_ro_m_a_c_o1_ors ________ :_:_:_::__ot_he_r_<_Ex_p_1a_i_n_in_R_e_m_a_rks_) _____ _ Remarks: I Field indicators of hydric soil NOT present I WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soils Present? I Wetland Hydrology Present? I Remarts: WETLAND CRITERIA NOT MET YES~ YES / YES . NO Is this Sampling Point within a ~ Wetland? ~ 1------------ Area appears to drain well following seasonal stonn events I I I I I --- Ci ------- ma, King County Or:partment of Devtl.opmmt md FA.vironmmu.l Setviccs 900 Oakesdale A'fenue Southwest Rtnto~ WA 9805S.1219 ------- Date; f/2-7/CL AppendixE: Bond Quantity Worksheet for Sensitive Area Mitigations 112'2;! ec t _!f-1 e::,6-,.,/oi.-II Proj act NWllber, Location, contact Name, Address: PLANT MA'l'IRIALS: Plant Material prices include labor, installation, contractors' markup and sales tax, but dan•t include delivery. (12Bt of wbo1esa11!!' plaz TRSBS Scientific Name Common Name Unit Pric1 Qtv Unit Pric Qty unit Pric Qty Unit Pric Qtv Total 4 11 cot 1 aallon 2 oallon 5 aa.llon Cost Abies m-andis* Qrand fir Acer macrophyllum big leaf macle $ 13.54 s - Alnus rubra lied alder s 13.22 • - Arbutus menziesii Pacific madrone $ 14..SO il - Betula pacvrifera oaoer birch • 13.22 $ - ~ f'raxinus latifolia Orecion ash $ 13.22 $ 23.51 --;: -/ 5'/I ;17 s ,1 5 -CO :,( Piaea sitchensis* Sitka spruce $ 13.54 $ 24.15 11 ({o;, 2.(.."1 $ 'fO (} -C,ci Pinus contorta * Shore nine $ 13.54 s 24.15 $ - Pinus montiaola• western white pine s 13.54 $ 24.15 $ - Populus tremuloides m1aking asnen • 24.15 s - Pon11lus trichocartia black cottonwood $ 13.54 s 23.Sl $ - Prunus emarqinata bitter cherry $ 13.54 s - Pseudotsuaa menziesi Doualas fir $ 13.54 $ ;!3.51 $ 44. 74 $ - Taxus brevifolia* Pacific yew $ - x Tbuja olias.ta* western red cedal $ 13.54 $ 23.51 • 44. 74 Zr) • );'"'/'t-"U Tsuga heteroohv1la• western hemlock $ 13.54 s 23.82 $ 44,74 $ - All plant i,r1ces are from Fourth corner NUrseries, Sound Native Plants, Storm Lake Growers, and Wabash Natives (aontai and Abwidant Life and Frostv Hollow (seeds). I I I I I I I I - wet>,,BondQuantttyWorksheetAnal ,xis sensitive Areas Bond Quantity WorkSheet Page 1 August 8, 1998 - ------------------- SHRUBS Unit Price unit Price Unit Price 'l'otal Scientific Name Common Name 4 11 cot QtY l l'lallon "tv 2 e1allon ''tv Other '"tv Cost Acer circin.atum vine mar::ile • 13 .54 • 23.51 $ - Ame1an.chier alnifoli eerviceber""'' $ 13. 54 • 23.B2 • - Berberis arn..1i£01ium tall Oregon aran1 • 24.15 ---. - Berberis nervosa short Orecon ara1 e • 13,86 • - Camus sto1onifera red~osier do.-n.,001 ll 13 .22 I./} s 23.51 s I) lQ -·J.,c Corvlus cornuta ha2elnut • 13.54 • 23.51 ---. - Crataeaus doualasii black hawthorn • 13. 22 • 23.51 • - Gaultheria shallo.tJ salal s l. 89 s 13.86 s - Holodiscus discolor ocean sriray •• 13. 54 • 23.51 • - Lonicera 1nvo1ucrata black twinber...-.., s 13. 54 Ui s 22. 87 s 1/,7 -lf·() Mvrlca <:tale sweetgale $ - 1onlopana.x horridus Devil's club • 13.86 s 24.15 • - Phlladelohus lewisli mock oranae • 13.54 • 2::i. 97 • - Phvsocarpus capitatu Pacific ninebark • 13. 22 ~ 1 • 23.51 = $ iJ. 70-7.() Prunus v1ra1n1ana choke cher...v • - P,rrus .fusca western crahannl1 • 13.22 • 23.51 ~ . - Rhamnus nurshiana cascara • 13.22 • 23.Sl $ - Rbod6dendron ma:cro~hullum Pacific rhododendron • 14 .19 • - Ribes bracteosum stink currant • 13 .22 • - Ribes lacustre pricklv currant s 13.86 $ - Rlbes sanauineum red-flowerina currant • l3. 86 • - Rosa '""""""'Ca ma wood rose s 13 .54 s 24.15 • - Rosa nutkana Noatka rose $ 13.54 $ 23.51 $ - Rosa nisoaa ~a clustered rose • l3 .54 • 22.87 • - Rubus leucodermis black rascberrv • - Rubus parviflorus thitnbleberrv $ 13 .54 $ - Rubus soectabil1s salmonber~ • 13 .22 1_() • 23.51 ,-,{) • ll tO -Zc Salix qeyer.iar1a Gever willow • 13 .22 • 22.87 $ - Salix hookeriana Hooker I s willow • 12. 91 s 22.87 • - Salix lasiandra P'acific willow • 13.22 • 22.87 • - Salix scouleriana Scouler willow • - Salix sitchensis Sitka willow • 13.22 2 CJ • 22. 87 s fn 1-qo Sambucus racemosa red elderOer-1 • 13 .54 • 23. 51 • - Sorbus sitchensis Cascade mountain ash • - Svmnhor1carJ)os albus snowberrv • 13.22 • 23.51 $ - Vaacinium ovatum everareen huckleberrv • 13.86 • - vaccin1um parvito11u red hucklebe:rrv I $ 2.91 • 1S.4i $ - web-BondQuantltyWorbheetAnal.xls Sensitive Areas Bond Quantity worksheet Paga l August 8, 1998 ------------------- Sedaes and Rushe, I Scientific Name Common Name Unit Pric Qty Unit PricJQt v Unit Pric, Qtv Qtv Total 4 11 oot Seeds/oz. 2 aallon Other coa:t Carex comosa Bristlv sedqe s 1. 32 • - Carex lenticularis Shore sedae s 1. 32 • - Carex 1 vnnb\lei L~""'"''""'° sedqe s 1. 32 • - Carex obnupta Slough sedc::ie s 1. 32 ' 19.20 • - Carex rostrata (utri Beaked sedge $ 1.32 Carex stipata Sawbeak sedqe s 1. 32 s - Eleocharis aciculari Snikerush • - Eleocharis calustris Common Soikerusb $ 1.32 • - Junous acuminatus rar.iered rush ' 1.32 • - Juncus articulatus Jointed rush • - Juncus effuaua(var. pac1t Soft rush s 1. 32 s - J'Unous ensifolius Daaaer leaf rush s 1. 32 • - Juncus o .... nneris Pointed rush • 1. 06 • - Scirous acutus Hardstem bulrush $ l. 32 $ 23.04 s - Scirnus maritimus Saltmarsh bu1rusl • 1. 32 .-- Scircus microca~us Smallwfr~ited bu s l. 32 s - Grasses Scientific Name Common Name Unit Pric atv Unit Pric Qtv unit Pric Qtv Qtv Total 4.jj not Seeds/oz. 2 aallon Cost Aloiu,curus aequali.s Short-awn foxtai • - Alonecurus aeniculat Water foxtail s 1. 00 • - 8eckman.nia svz1qachn American slougha] $ 1. 20 • 3.04 s - Calamagrostis C4llade.."lBi Blue;oint reedgrass • - C.inna lati.folia wood reed s - .Desobamosia caesnito Tufted hairarass s L06 s 9 .60 :. - El tnnus crlaucus Blue wildrve s l.36 s - Festuca idahoensis Ida.ha fescue • 3.52 • - Festuca rubra var. : Red fescue s 4. 79 • - Glvceria borealis (o Northern manna---ass • l. EiO s - Glvceria elata. Tall mannaarass I $ 1.45 $ l.60 • - Panicum occidentale Western canic-grass • - Ferns Scient:!tic Name Common Name Unit. Pric Qtv unit Pric Qtv Unit Pric Qtv Qtv Total 4n cot 1 t'tallon 2 Nallon Cost Athvrium filix-femin ladv fern s 13.96 • - Blech.num spicant deer fern $ 13.86 $ - DrVt"'lnteris expansa shield 1:ern $ 13.54 s - Polystichum munitum western sword fern • l3 .96 $ - Pteridium al'\'11i11nium bracken s - web·BondQuanHtyWorksheetRnal.xls sensitive Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet Page 3 August 8, 1998 ------------------- Herbs and Groundcovers I Scientific Name Common Name Unit Pric Qtv Unit Pric Qty Unit Pric~Qty Qtv Total 4" """'t l aallon Seeds/oz. Cost Achillea mi11efo1ium Yarrow $ 11.52 An.aohalis ma.7'"naritar Pearlv everlasting $ 7.68 Arctosta~hvlos uva-u Kinnikinnick $ 2.27 $ 33.2B $ . Aruncus di oi cus Goat's beard $ 13.54 s 33.28 $ . Caltha t>alustris Marsh mariqold $ 14 .19 $ 20.48 $ . Dicentra tormosa Bleeding heart $ 2.27 • 13.22 S 122.88 $ . er,ilobium &n""•stifol Fireweed $ 61.44 s . Fraqaria chiloensis coast strawberry $ 2.27 $ 57.60 $ . Geum macronhv11um Bia-leaf avens s 2.27 $ 51. 20 s . Heracleum lanatum cow oarsnip $ 1.45 $ . Hydropbyllum tenuipe Pacific waterleaj $ 2.27 $ 17.92 $ - Linnaea borealis Twintlower $ 2.27 $ 143. 4Ei $ . Lu.oinus polvnhvllus Big-leaf lupine $ 6.72 $ . Lvsichiton amerioanu Skunk cak>baqe $ 13.86 $ . Maianthemum dilatatu Wild lily of the $ 2.27 $ . Mimulus auttatus Yellow monkev fl, • 2.27 $ 128. 00 $ . Mvosot1s laxa Small forget-m~-not $ 26.88 $ . Oe.na.ntbe sarmentosa Water parsley $ 12 .SB s 44.80 $ . Osmorhlza chiloensis Sweet cic:elv $ 44.BO $ . OXal is oreqana Wood-sorrel $ 2.27 $ B9.fi0 $ . Petasites friaidus Coltsfoot $ 13 .22 $ - Polvcrnnum rurirs:taaria Lady 's thumb $ . Potentilla fruticosa aush cotentilla s . Smilacina stellata S0lomon 1 s Star $ 2.27 $ . Stachvs coolevae Great betonv s 102.40 $ . Tell.1ma rrrand.1I1ora Fringecuc $ 3B.40 s . Tiarella tr1foliata Foamflower $ 143. 46 $ . Tolmiea menaiesii Pinrm.back nlant $ 2.27 s 102.40 $ . Viola alabella Stream violet $ 2.27 $ . web-BondQuantttyWorlcsheetRnal .xis Sensitive Areas Bond Quantity Worl<Sheet Page4 August 8, 1998 ------------------- INSTALLATION COSTS I LABOR. EOUIPMBNT OVERHEAD & PROFIT) Tvne I unit Pric, tlnit Total Comnost, vegetable, delivered and sor • 37.8B CY $ . Decomnactinq till/hardoan, medium, to $ l. S7 CY Oecomoacting till/hardpan, medium, to $ 1. 57 CY Fertilize, slow release tablets, 30gm s 3.21 Bach $ - HvdroseedinQ I s 0.51 SY s . Labor, aeneral (landecacina) $ 25.00 HR $ . Labor, general (construction) s 37.00 Hit $ . Labort Consultant, sucervisina • ss.oo HR $ . Laber: Consultant, on-site re-desiqn s 95.00 HR $ . PLANTS: Potted, 4" diameter, medium $ 0.68 S:ach $ . PLANTS1 Container, 1 aallon, mediums s 10.02 Bach s - PL.ANTS: Container, 2 gallon, mediums $ 16.(7 Kach h/.) J,n_ $ "1'?!?-2<7 PLANTS, Container, 5 aallon, medimr. s 29. 38 Each ,-,"n G_ •• ,,.. s11rb·1. oo PLANTS: Seedinc:i, hv hand s 0.44 SY $ - PLANTS: Slics (willow, red-osier) s l.32 Each $ - PLANTS, stakes (willow) $ 0.96 Each s . Rental of deoomnactina machine...-v & on • 70.65 Hour sand, coarse builder's, delivered and s 42.06 CY $ . Staking material (set per tree) • 7.00 Bach s . Surveving, line & qrade $ 605.44 PAY s . Surveying, lot location & lines $ 1,353.60 ACRE $ . Survevina, tor,ncrrachical $ 2,160.00 ACRB $ . Tilling topsoil, diok hatrow, 20hp tractor, $ 1.02 SY $ . O'l'BBR COSTS -THROUGHOUT MONITORING PERIOD 'I'vne Unit Pric Unit Total Inscection, annual S 460.00 EACH s iJ I, i'l,J -Cf) Inspection, final £; 575.00 EACH $ 5'7{-DtJ Maintenance, semi-annual $ . Maintenance, annual I $ . Monitorina, annual • . Watering, l" of water, 50 1 soaker hos s 3.62 MSF $ . Irriqation -temoorarv $ :a,000.00 Acre Irriaation -buried $ 4,500.00 Aore I web·BondQuantltyWorlcsheetAnal. xis senstttve Areas Bond Quantity worksheet Page 5 August 8, 1998 ------------------- HABITAT STRUCTURES (includes delive--) ITEMS 1 Unit cost unit Tot.al Fascines (willow) I Bach s . Logs, (cedar) 1 w/ root wads, 16n-24• diam., $ 1,000.00 Each $ . Logs (eeda:r) 'il/o root wads, 16•-.24" diam., • 400.00 Bach • . t.oga, w/o root wads, 16°-24• diam., 40' lon $ 245.00 Bach s . Logs w/ root wads, l6fl-24" diam., 40 1 long $ 460.00 Each • . Rocks, one-man s 60. 00 Bach s . Rocks, two-man s 85.00 Each $ . Root wads $ 163.00 Each • . Scawnina aravel, t,n-e A s 22. 00 CT s . Weir -log $ 1, soo.oo Sach Weir -ad;ustable 9 2,000.00 Each "X r Woodv debris, larne s 163. 00 Kach ' a i "''1 • Ci') Snaas -anchored S 400.00 Bach ( Snaas -on site «: s SO.DO Each -l ii,'(:.' oa Snaas -imnorted $ 800. 00 Bach EROSION CONTROL ITEMS Unit cost Unit Total Backfill and comnaction-embankment s 4. 89 CT s - Crushed surfacina 1 l 1/4" minus $ 74.30 CT $ . Ditchina s 7. 03 CT • . '"' Bxcavation, bulk $ l. 30 C'l s . , Fence, silt $ 1. 20 LF ,-,,oo $ 6 O(}-\,() .1ute Mesh s 1.26 SY • - MUlch, bv hand, straw, 2" deen $ l.27 SY s - MUlch, by hand, wood chics, 2" deep s 3.25 SY • - MUlch, bv ma.chine, straw, 1 11 deeo $ 0, 32 SY s . EJinino, temnorarv, CPP, 6 11 $ 9.30 LF • . Pieing, temrtorarv, Ct>P, 8' $ 14.00 LF s - Pipinq, temr:orarv, CPP, 12" s 18.00 LP s . Plastic coverina, Eitt.rrt thick, sandba"',.. s 2.00 SY • . Rip Rao, machine r.laaed, slot"leS s 33. 98 C'l s - Rock Constr. Entrance 100 1 x1s•x1 1 $ 2,5-46.6B Each • . Rock Constr. Entrance so 1 x1s 1 x1 1 $ 1,273.34 Bach $ . Sediment nond riser assemhlv $ 1,695.11 Bach $ . Sediment trat1 1 s 1 high berm $ 15.57 LF • - Sediment trap, 5 1 high berm w/apillway incl $ 59.60 LF s . Sodding, 111 deeo, level around s 5.24 SY $ . Soddina, l" deen, sloned r'fround s 6.48 SY s - straw bales, nlace and remove s 432.00 TON $ . Topsoil, delivered and snread s 35.73 CT $ . I web--BondQuantltyWorksheetAnal .xts sensitive Areas Bond Quantity worNsheet Page6 August 8, 1998 ------------------- GENERAL ITEMS I Unit Cost llllit Total Fencina, chain link, 6' hiah s 18.89 LF $ - fencing, chain link, corner posts $ 111.17 Bach $ - Fencing, chain link, gate S 277.63 Each $ - Fencin"" sclit rail, ~1 hiah (2-rail) $ 10.54 LF $ - Fencing, temporary {NGPE) s 1.20 LF $ - Signs, sensitive area bound.aT'V s 2.50 Each $ - STEEP SLOPE SLOPE INSTABILITY WRITE-IN ITEMS OTHER NOTE: All plant prices are from Storm Lake Orowers, Wabash Natives, Fourth Corher, and Sound Native Plants (containers), and from Frosty Hollow and Abundant Life (seeds}, --··---i {J. )fb-L' /} 301 CONTINGl!!ICY & MOBILIZATION, $ I/-OD'"'f7IT TOTAL: $1 TfT{;, 32. web·BondQuantityWorksheetFlnal.xls Sensitive Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet Paga 7 August 8, 1998 . "' 450.65 '+-,, A PorUon of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of SecUon 14 Township 23 North, Range 5 East Willamette Meridian, King County, Washington ~ ~ t)l ~ ~ li • ... I .. 4' ... J ( ~ Nll"U'JB"W~ , II; 1t' yout)l 1ilatb ~e,..,.---.:.,~"' ~--------=-= -= • CJ ...... ... ....,. .,,,, II; 11'11-1-t: 40Z.t2 South 136th Street ~ f --IS',e>111n,: 4".» ... , 1[1t'N-S: "' "O 0 GRAPHIC SCA1.E 1·-too· Lf'··hfl\e;&A-1·-1,... ! • 0 ,oo 200 300 BASIS OF' SURVEY THIS SURVEY JS BASED ON A PREVIOJS SlllVEY Of THIS PAOPERTY, RECORD OF s.JIYEY, AfN 2k18099008, PJEAa: COUNTY, IIIASHINGTON • BASIS Of BEARlNG MONIJHEHTS TtE IIEST LINE OF Tt£ SOIJtHIIEST IJUAATEJI OF SECTION U. AS SHOljN ON RECOFI> OF SIFt'EY. N'N 9S08099008, FIJTATED -(l '18'49" R[f£RENC£ SURVEYS PLAT OF CARa..lllOOD. AFN NCIB280!58!5 Pl.AT Of ROSE GARDENS. 1FN 62610U PLAT OF WILLIAM'S 51.NfY SLOPES, AfN 5'979118 RECOAO OF SURVEY, AFN 78110390U ff;:CCR> Of SI.JWEY. Af'N 9508099006 911'!922'( 13:li._ff YQTICAl. DATUM KING COLWTY SURVEY CONTROL POINT fRENT2l~ ELEVATION 468.87 East 1 /4 Comer Section 14 "' ,,, ·eo -,-- j ~~ . I! -~11{:'' ,..,,~\i, " --" ... EOUIPMOO USED TOPCON GTS 38 TOTAL STATION 1-P--dGX DATA CCU.ECTOR ~ ~ ~ ~ DRYCO Surveying, Incorporated 12714 VALLEY AVENUE EAST SUMNER, WA 98390 253--826--0300 FAX 253--826--9703 ·~"·.· /" ~ .. ~' ~ :t:': . ' f: ~k~ ~1 \ r}s I. ~ Ii C: ... ~ ·1~ '<Ii !! :5 <I) I __.,, .t. .... 1~ Parcel A /"'ob,~ ( ""' Rbse .. ) r~Jr~,. .J ,----~ : Or~fl. : ..... ,n~-yh_....:::-:_7.,, •'1 / / ,_ '\:::=I ,. / ,,, • " Tii:,113'ered _.,.Area ,,, / ;-c-'~ SE 138th Plac~ ill Gardens Lot 10 ,JI ,,.. Un platted ,, ,o !,l' "' ... '" C • mn--- "' ~ GI s I ~ I ~· ~ s t)l ' • II ~ "' ::§ "t:, " --i ::§ ---<ISol.H CIZ'"Jt:-.JI C 12"S; 4=.71 8 0 0 .. "' 0, - PR0CEDUR£ USED Fia.D TRAVERSE ll El..Et1R0NIC DAT A a:u.ECTIClil l£GAL DESCRIPTION TKE £AST I-IMF OF TKE ~ QlWnER OF Tt£ SOUTHCAST flUAA1T.II' Cf" s:::ma,: ~.;.. 1,:-,-.,.s,;.-.i:l MMnt, iwc.[ 5 EAST 'Ml.l.AW£TT£ MERl)Wt. IN KINC COUH?Y WASKNCTON.. • . EXCEPT THAT PORTlOH OF SN!> £AST HALF OF THE NOflTMl£ST CllWfTER OF THE SOUlH£.AST OUNnEJt or 5-.o SECTIOH 14 OESCR18ED NS f"Ol..l.Ow..: BEGINNIHC AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER SO 5,1,10 EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QtJARTEA or THE SOUlH£.AST QU.fRTER; lH£NCE NORTH 00'25'21• £AST 523.H FEET AlOMG TH[ EAST LINE or SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST OlJMJER or THE SCJUn£ASr OlUiR1ER; TiiENCE NORTM 88"07"58" WEST 653.61 FEET TO THE WEST UHt Of SAID EAST tW.r OF THE NORTHWEST QUMTER OF TH£ SOUTHEAST oi.wm:R: THDICE SOUTH OC727"0:i 1l'£ST !125..82 FEET TO THE SOUTH LW£ OF SW EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST OUMTER OF THE SOIJTHEAST QUfRf£R; THENCE SOUTH B8'1Tl5" £AST GSJ.84 FEET Al.ONG THE SOUTH UNE or !WO £AST HALF OF THE NOlfTHWEST QUAR1ER OF TH[ SOUlHEAST QWRTER TO TH( TRUE POIHT or 8EG1NN1NG. TOGETHER 'MIH THE NOlml HAU' or TH£ NOfffil HALF or THE ~ CIUMTER OF THE NORTH'flEST DUARTtR OF TI€ SOLllHWEST Ql.WlTUt OF SECDON 14. TOWNSHf' 23 HORTH. RAHGC !I EAST, Wffl..lJiMETTE W£RIDINrf. ICINQ COUfm', -EXCEPT COUNlY """5. ~ IIJNUWENT f'OOND THIS SURVEY FOUND PROPERTY COANEA AS IMJICAT£0 ET REBAR ll CAP LS• 6228 SET PK Iii TAG LS• 6228 "'"""' wrnR """" ..... urur, POU "" """"' 181 PHOHE OR CA8LE PEl)ESTAL Q FIRE HY!Rt.NT A. w,JER \11,1.\,£ ~ U.TEA IETEA t:J ColJCH BASt1 OR IN.£T llr ... """' 0 0£C0J0US AS OE5CRIBED -E-O'f'ER H£JD W:CTlaC UES ..........-EDG[ OF PA~ ~ = ~OR WIit: FDa --11-U.-m:LUE ~ !! i ;-. I • l ! ;\ So,theo,t Come, +· -I Section 1 4 e i 5118 '51 '58'! mo :12· } South 1 / 4 Comer Section 14 -SO--STORM DRAIN =·--"'-""' ~ ' l ' ' • SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATIE: THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENITS A SURVEY ~ B'I' .U: OR UNDER WY OIR[C'TION IN CONFOl!nW¢E WITH THE RE!lUIR[M[XTS Of Tl-£ SUIMY RECQR!lUr,11; N:W. c;, M WIGENT IP.LS. )4145 1'11""1 I .. " l"°-~~blom/Ma,!r Topograph~ Project l.oeaUoD Renton Hi9hland~ on SE IS6th Street al!'ld V'<le!;t of 160th Avenve SE · IDRAWN Mn IUl'flD: ~. 2000 am MatD: Vil/21»1 C:!lapu:.c.~ t:11-•-•••,-llalllli-,...... -............ '"' tN1.m.m1 • ___ .,... ... .,.... ... ,.._.11,~e .. ,__.._ __ _.. __ ............ 11111 ... 11111_ .. ..., __ _ -•lt.ct.w.&121.j M .,..wa,-.~.....,,..,...,. • .,..,._. ....... -.. ., ... .... ... ..... --~-... _..,..._..._, .. ..,.o ___ l\!IMLTml ...... _..,.~ __ ,., ... .._l!:J_III .... IIIIIIOIE:1'---...-e- 1111:,Mllllllll_lf...,.lrG,a ----'"""'--·-·- L -~llt"'2!A.IUII•• .... n.1a1=,r1t-.-...... ~tr ... ---''--'- D. AllideJIIIIA'IUlllls•lllllldlllll,C.C.IIA.Wllt= .... -., ...... .,. ...... ___ ... _ ... _ ...... .._.,. --i.ct:.ZIA.llm·--- ____.ll:!L0-·-· .... 4X • .._ ...... q •14.JI -=---=ii.• _ __,_ .... ,-. ................ ---·-- 1. -11• .. --......... ... l._ ............ ..-- "· ....,,..OD,IIIAIGrdlclll!IIIIIICIC,C,C.N.'11.'ICQI; __ .......... 1 .. ""'""•·---------~-· .. W..R ______ ll_•,..._._...-Cllllllm,,,c:arl- ............ -• ....... I--W•-.. -llf_....llr ................. ,. ......... ,.....i .... , ......... ,cu. tl.l.M.-~lllllo:.(rllfl .............. 111 .. ,,, .... ~., ...... ... -prttU.N,.'IC.-........ -....... ,..., .......... ,._ ....... -~ -. .... .. ....,_., ........... -. --------...... , ilh: ..... , m..-1o11 ,.....i __ , _____ _ .............. ....__ ..................... _ ..... ,. _ _,.. ___ -·-Dl1'MNI -----"-n,........,, .... .......... ~ ..... -· ... ........ , ____ ,.... ... .,-. . Y. IIIIWlll:t!t •,U:.C.ZSAam, ____ .. ________ .. __.. .... , .... 11..illl .. lW ..... .... _ .. lllfgllllllllilllllr ..... Crulr~-llll-Willllll-···-· ...,.4 __ ...,._ - ---1--=-==--=-·--" ............. ~. f'oJO .,.._ ......................... -c:-cr .... -fUM ______ ,..... ....... ~ ...... 1111111U;IIIII .. ___... .............. ---..----MJl:!I _,.....,KIIOIIIJllllll...., .. -•-----D*I _ .. .,,...a*ll..-,~----------- MCCMM.111. ..... N', __ .L __ ........... .. __ _,_ ________ _.._~ .... --... ,z, ,,, Tll:II---.• _ ............ ij 3::=:. .... 111.:nllalllb-• ..,..111111 __ ...... ... ...... _ ... m=,,.tM,11111111111!111Dllllllll"""21A.II.Q ---~....-~ ~ .............. -. ........... --..- ......... ....,11 ...... ,._ ...... lJ.,. .... M1111119.ll .. o=,II_ .. ""*"YJal ... -.-.................. ...., .......... JtC.C.:MGJlf ... 11111--....,, ...... ~ ............ c.rr.--.. KC,C. ...... -____ , ... ...., ........... 1.11 2,41 .. ...., •• _ .. ..,w~ • -~·---91Q'1, .. bllllCC.IIA.1lm••-=-...... .n..L. ____ ... EVENDELL PRELIMINARY PLAT SE 1/4 S14-T23N-R5E SCAii: 1· • 100' P'a,""wE~ 100 0 100 200 C,? .. ~~~. , .. ~ \ \ ..,---·--Jlll 1 \ ... ~- ~-!Hl\U-"--J· 'i, I I ::iJ, ~ '\ l\~· -----,, ,h" " { i --=--=---=-t------,,,-"' ~ --/ i @ -, ~Polo <\ C i#" ?" j:'>l I i :i 1 ,,151 -~ ··I ell I ~ --1"i11'i l:l 1 .J· -1 L,--I~ ~!... I I,,._) ~\ ~ \ I • R-4 I t'~'"'"ibs ::,1 . t)li· -·-.@1 _. _@L . , ~~ '5I R-4 "' I 3i. ----·-,-:r,t ~1 t-_I , r ----i--rz='-''.J-., ~i... i J \ \ I 1. "'--"· "'I! 'r I + :Si J-_l _J _J • @l I ~ ,,.J.--_.!Z.Ajj <ct " ~ &Qj i ~ ~: i - ...... - m;;tD(, 1QllaCPlMf&: """"' 'IWi,JUEl(f\DII ... - i ~i ~\ ~1 ~ ! ..... -...... """""' ""' Sl«lllil'CM:. ..,.. ..... """"..,,.,, ........ """"""""" """' .......... , ...... ..... _ ...... _ __ .. P.D.b:ZZ2111 _ ......... ....... ----·--~IL _ ..... ..,_ • I .. .. ............ ... l:NSl.l!IWlll.1ll:IIBIW. """"""" DIJa:ulf'f' IQJERt81RICrGI IENIC 35 l:IWI QIBo:um'FREClll'M:l'm """' ------........... i ,lo- """""' Lot7 R se .__~, ... ---~ IUlllo.WANZJI ""'"'"" .,._ ..,_ IZ714VdlJ,-.&::t am..WA .. ... ..... 1. 4!llilf, WETLAND FILL • 200 SQ, FT. 2. ~ 8UITTR OISTUR!IANCE A. BY R.O.W. • 4,649 SQ. n. a. B'1' LOTS • 9,3'40 SQ. FT. 3. ~ BUFFER REPLACEMENT/AVERAGING AREA • 1!1,4lil!I SQ. FT. 4, C:) BUFFER ENI-L'.NCEMENT ARr.A • ±!l,000 SQ. FT. (IF R£Q'D) (TO BE SEl..£CTED BY BIOLOGIST') S.A.T. '0' A. BUFF[R AREA • fO,~ SO. FT . B. WETL>ND AREA • t~,162 SQ, FT • PERIMETER ROW /.M.A • 24,91i13 SQ, FT. INTERIOR PUBLIC ROAD AREA .• 55.SOQ SQ, FT. INTERIOR PRIVATE ROAD JtMA • 17,52!1 SQ. FT. STORMWAlER DETENTION TRACT ~· AREA • 4,421 SQ. FT. STORMWATER DETENTION TRACT "'M• AAIA • 35,835 SQ. FT. RECREATION TAACT "L• AREA • 14,871 SQ, FT • AR£A Of TRACT "M• OUTSIIE OF 100 YEAR WATER SURFACE lEVEl. • 11,808 SQ. FT '!' 1 I ;,_ I J,}- 1~ ~ .,, " --i :S ~~ It, :It ~<Q, WW. """"""'" ti ~ ~Is ,,.,,, ST -ti ! YJCINIJY MAP ~ti ~ I '!' n£ EAST fW..F Of Tl£ NOflllflttST QlWllER OF TH£ sotm1EA.ST QLWITER OF SEC'OON 14, TOWNSHf' 23 NORTH. RANGE 5 EAST, WIWM£T1t MERIDWf. IN iONG COUffl, WASHINaTON; EXCEPT tw.T PO!fflON OF SW EAST IW.F OF 1HE NOlffltWESf QiJ,l,RTER Of' TllE SOUTHfAST cu,.,mR OF SW stCTlON 14 DE$Cfi!8ED AS FOLI.OWS: 8EClrlNlNO AT THE SOUT'H£AST CORHER Of SAID EAST ~ OF 1ltE NORTHlll'EST ~ Of Tl£ SOJTHfAST QLIAATEA AS TH£ POINT Of TRUE BEGINNIHG; nDCE NORT1i 00'2:i'11" EAST !523.llll FEET ALON!: THE EAST LNE Of S-.0 EAST tw.Y Of ll£ MORTHWEST QU,t,RTER OF" THE SOUTKfAST QU,t,R1'ER; l1£JrlCE NOfmi &a" OT!!le" WEST 153.4!11 FEET TQ THE WEST I.NE Of SAIO EAST IWJ' OF n£ NORfWWEST QUIJnER OF THE SOUTHtAST QUAKJER; n£MCE SOUTH 00-27'~· WEST U!.82 FEET TO THE sount LN: Of !WO EAST 1WF Of n£ NORrl'WESf QtMT[R OF n£ SOUTl1EAST OUol.RTUt THENC[ SOUTH 8S'17'35" EAST G53.M FEtT ALONQ THE SOllll-1 UN£ Of SAil EAST IW.F Of THE NOAlHWESJ' Qt.MTER Of 1HE SOUT'H£AST Qllo\RTLR TO Tl£ TRUE POINT OF 8EGNUNQ. """" "'""" ...... TOCEl'HER WITH Tlilol PORt10N OF 11-£ NORTH 1/2 Of ll£ JrC>RTH 1/2 Of TllE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of' THE ~1~or~~J/~~~,~~~2lTONO~.~~~w~ UNDER l(INCl COMTY RECORDCNC NllilBER 1084243: · EXCEf'I' THAT PORtlON OF Tl£ WESTERLY 1fl FEET n£REOf, AS WfASURED FROM Tl£ £AS1Efa.Y w.RG1N Of SA10 15$TN AVEN.JE SE, L'l'ING soun£RLY Of n£ NORTH JO FEET ntEREOF. STUATE IN THE COUNTY Of K1G. srATE Of WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WllH A MON-DCaJJSriC £ASOIOlT FOR IHGRESS, EGRESS AHO tm.mES o.'ER, lKIER MID ACROSS ;,.;: ;;.:,itT" i~ FU::1 uF int: w~r Ur,1 fr.U (.AS ~ Arull TI£ £ASftRLY W,lrACIN OF COUHlY Rew, AIGHT-oF-WA"t'J OF LOT 2 or SHORT Pl.AT NO. 87111133, RECORDED Ut«R IONC OOUtm RECOA01NG NO. ~t. RECORDS Of IQNG COIMn', WASHINCTON. TOOt1MER WITH A MON-DCCWSN( EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS ANO UTlLmES o.'ER, tMllER AND ACROSS THE SOIJTH 15 FEET Of THE EAST 22 FEET Of TI£ ftST 1n Fm. AS MEASURED fROU THE v.sTUU.Y UARQN OF WO 15ell-l ~ 5(, OF mo.T POROON OF' n£ NORTH 1/2 OF lHE HORTH 1/2 Of THE :-F~·-~. ~~ ~4~ ~~1{}~~ ~~ 2l NORTH, t EGENO::fllSDNG 9 WOHUWENT F'OUJtD TtlS SURIIE.Y 0 FOi.NO Pm:IPERTY CORNER AS IJrrlllCATED O SET REBAR lil CAP LS• 6228 A SET PK ,ll T A8 LSf, 6228 ,. ELEC1RIC """' 0. PmlEll PCLE ~ U11U1Y POl[ -GUY ANCHOR 181 PttoHE OR CABLE PEDESTAL (:J FIRE HYDRANT &, WJiT[R Vl,LVE lt WA TEA IETER Cl CUCH &.SIN OR iNl.ET "' "" M£1ER 0 OECIOOOUS AS DESCR18ED --t-CNER HEAD D.ECm1C UHES ......,-EDGE OF PAVEMENT -X-CHAIN LINK OR WIRE FDfCE -------o--WOOO FENCE ~-WATER.It£ -~ STORM DRAIN mrrrnTu BUI.OINCS )--( CWIERT ---CONTOUR LINE t!QIES, I fA2fP-:ffilZQ5fP 11 WATER tETf!l M WATER VAL.!£ 1.H. FIRE. H'fDRJ.NT Ir" :}~ Bl.OCICWG a CA TQf 8J.StH 0 UANHQ.E aL<HOCJT CAP ----Pf«PERTY I.IIE (PR!POSED) -·-·---·-·-LOT~ (PmPOSED) --£XlSTING LOI' LINE/ROW 1, eun.DINGS WARl<£D WITH AN * WU. BE DEMOUSHED. SCllL: 1·-100' I °'TE: 5/29/01 I """"" ""' PLAT ~ '°"°""""" "' GEORGE W. DRYSDML. P.LS. DRYCO Surveying & Mapping 12714 VAU.EY AVENUE EAST SUMNER. WASHINGTON 9BJ90 (25J) ....... "" (25J) .,._,,., OF EVENDELL 75 WT PRELIMINARY PLAT I OMWN 81: liLIR . """" u.S. LANO OE.VEI.OPt.400 ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 22200 SEATTLE WA 98122-0200 CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 22817 -STH OR. SE., B0THEU. WA 98021 ,.,... ..._2563 OFT. (4'"" 481-3273 FAX SHEET I Of" I , / , .. ·· \.-.,, ,, . . ·>-. ...a· · Petition to Intervene: ~. .. Pr-oposed Evendell Zone Recla~on and Plat Pennlt Applications -L01Pwi6 and L01TY401 This Petition to Intervene has been compiled from the notes, letters, surveys and conversations of the neighbors to the subject parcels of these applications. The materials contained in it have oeen prepared and delivered by Gwendolyn High and Marsha Rollinger. The subjects covered are of the highest concern of all citizens involved. We trust that these matters will be considered by the responsible parties with the same level of care we have expended in bringing them to your attention. All assertions stated here are based on our collective understanding of the situatioril If we are in error, your knowledgeable correction is most appreciated. Gwendolyn High and Marsha Rollinger pemion the King County Hearing Examiner's Office to intervene on behalf of the neighboring community in the matter of the Zone Reclassification and Plat Applications -L01 P0016 and L01TY401. Gwendolyn High Marsha Rollinger 425.917.0117 425.277.0245 13405 158m Ave SE Renton WA 98059 15646 SE 138"' Pl Renton WA 98059 We have no representing attorney. We will speak for ourselves and our neighbors. Thank you for your time and attention. Gwendolyn High Marsha Rollinger cMtJiVJ~~ z:/19/o~ Exhibit No . .-!::2:;..;3:;;._ __ _ Item No. L.o/ PDO/h <:t" t..blT'l~ctf Received ?-lo ' 0 S ).. ~ ,, King County Hearing Examiner 'f, \~\ l'D I D ~ '-&V / Petition to Intervene: .. . Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications -L01 P0016 and L01 TY 401 Who We Are Since November 2001, Gwendolyn High and Marsha Rollinger have been meeting with and recording the concerns of the neighbors who will be most impacted by the subject applications. We have had three meetings, three newsletters, numerous email discussions and two more meetings are planned. Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Evendell represents over 70 households and over 150 individuals whose residencies range from one year to more than forty years. Their contact information is attached. · Ms. Rollinger is an accomplished graphic designer and commercial artist. Ms. High is a data analyst, programmer and information technology project manager. She is also the district representative for this neighborhood on the Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council, where she serves as Secretary and Transportation Representative. In the later capacity she has served since October 2002 as the only citizen representative on the King County Transportation Concurrency Advisory Committee. What We Have Accomplished On April 5'", 2002, we delivered our first Response to these applications. From the data reported in this submission and other communications with DOES staff, our concerns over drainage impacts were further investigated and found to be factual. Additional drainage requirements have resulted. What We Hope To Achieve Several issues of contention in two broad categories remain. We oppose the application for Zone Reclassification and we seek additional mitigation for the impacts of the Plat application as provided by King County and State law. The balance of this document is an outline of the issues as we see them. • Ps:mA? nfA Petition to Intervene: Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications -L01P0016 and L01TY401 Zone Reclasslflcatlon Infrastructure Police The population of the Fred Two precinct has grown dramatically. In 2002 applications for over 2000 single family homes were submitted, but the assigned officers have decreased from 2. 9 to'2.7 over the last 5 years. The crime rates are rising. II is a clear and present danger to public safefy to allow this trend to continue. Fire The City of Renton provides fire protection services for this area of unincorporated King County. This constitutes a kind of functional interlocal agreement for which consideration of Renton's standards for the accommodation of emergency vehicles and zoning must be included in the evaluation of these applications. Renton requires additional site access and road network connectivity, wider and thicker road surfaces with larger turning radii. The Evendell, and all applications for development in areas for which the City of Renton provides Fire Protection, should require these design standards. Transportation Functional Arterial Reclassification Study: King County's Transportation Planning Division began a county wide Functional Arterial Reclassification Study in 2002. The last time the arterial system was reviewed and changed systemwide for Unincorporated King County was in the King County Transportation Plan, adopted in 1989. The Rural portion of this study is now complete. Within the 1,100 miles of rural roadway system, total roadway miles· changed were 47.6 miles, with 28.5 miles changing to a lower functional classification and 19.1 miles changing to a higher classification. The Urban portion of the study can be expected to yield comparable reclassifications, and 156th Ave SE is likely to be classified as a Principle Arterial over its current rating as a Minor Arterial. If this study determines that 156th has been functioning at a higher classification, the Traffic Study done for these applications will be proven have been prepared based on incorrect Levels of Service, warrants, etc. All Traffic Plan and related proposed impacts must be reevaluated based on the results of this study. Transportation Capacity and Improvements: The entire area from the City Limits of Renton to the City, Limits of Issaquah, from May Valley to the Cedar River Valley have been out of compliance with King County Concurrency standards since spring 2002. The currently proposed Concurrency Status Map (lo be adopted before March 2003) shows no improvement, even with the introduction of averaging factors to prevent a single critical link from driving a zone out of compliance. The current Capital Improvements Plan holds no improvements for our area. The KC Comprehensive Plan: Community Action Strategies -Subarea Priority Ranking places East Renton behind North Highline, West Hill, North Soos Creek and Juanita/Kingsgate for both Urban Retrofit and New Capacity Improvements. Physical and Political Isolation: . The eastern projection of the Urban Growth Boundary that surrounds the area of unincorporated King County from the City Limits of Renton to approximately Lake Kathleen, is isolated by topology and jurisdictional boundaries that prevent logical connection and improvements to the local street netwolk. 158"' Ave SE is the only North/.South connection serving this entire plateau. There is no alternative route available to provide additional access or capacity due to the extreme changes in elevation, and the lack of formal intertocal agreements between King County and the City of Renton leaves our community caught between opposing finger-pointers. The Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council, · through multiple correspondences with both jurisdictions has been assured by each that the other is responsible to provide transportation capacity. The resultant situation is that we will never have the · capacity available to bring this area back into LOS compliance. · Elliot Bridge Replacement: . The Elliot Bridge is scheduled for replacement. During this major project, traffic along 158"' Ave SE will be severely impacted, and access to residences in this community will be very 'difficult We ask Petition to Intervene: C I · • '61 Proposed.Evendell Zone Reclass cation and Plat Permit Applications· l.OTP0016 and L01TY401 Zoning that road improvements associated with the Evendell applications be required to not coincide with any Elliot Bridge traffic impacts. Present Piecemeal zoning demands that decisions by made for which careful and coordinated consideration by the King County Council is not possible. Zoning and Land Uses. issues can not be successfully addressed one at a time. These issues can not be isolated from each other or from other areas. The County Council has wisely made provision for this fact. King County has a Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Plans which are re-evaluated on a regular schedule with changes scheduled to be evaluated and adopted by December 2004. Given the unique geographic and jurisdictional isolation of this area, all zoning changes should be considered in the more appropriate larger context. U-120 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states 'King County shall not approve proposed zoning changes to increase density within the Urban area unless: a. The development will be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhood;' Of the residential development applications pending with ODES in the Newcastle Planning Area, 13 proposed units are single family or short plat applications, with no request for zoning changes. 310 units ere represented by 5 Plat or Pre-Plat applications with no request for zoning changes. Of those 310 units, 6 represent requests for Density Transfer credits. The only applications requesting or considering Zone Reclassification are the 3. !)f US Land Development. These do not reflect the character or scale of the existing neighborhood or of the concurrent development under application. See attached Online Permit Details obtained from the ODES website. Aerial photos of the community further illustrate the incompatibility of the requested zone reclassification with the character and scale of the neighborhood. There is no adjacent nor contiguous parcel currently zoned for density of greater than R-4. Future This area is within the Potential Annexation Area of the City of Renton. Renton has just given notice of a proposed annexation between the subject parcels and the City Limits of Renton. The proposed annexation will maintain zoning comparable to that presently in force. This shows Renton's intent for the long term development of this area. See attached Notice of Application for the Bales Annexation by the City of Renton. The City of Renton anticipates a reevaluation of its Comprehensive Plan for this area's zoning to coincide with King County's schedule of Comprehensive Plan updates. Both are expected to be complete by December 2004. No changes in zoning are expected to be introduced. Approval of the application for Zone Reclassification will create a development that is not and never will be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhoods. Alternatives to Zone Reclassification Under the Comprehensive Plan, King County allows the transfer of development rights from the Rural area to the Urban area as a means of preserving rural land. This very mechanism for achieving greater density inside the Urban Growth boundary is being utilized two blocks north of the subject parcels in the proposed Hamilton Place development (L02P0011 ). This is the responsible alternative by which the requested density may be achieved. Petition to Intervene: Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Pennit Applications -L01P0016 and L01TY401 1\/ilscellaneous Mitigation King County code guarantees improvements and mitigation to be included in the development plans. We repeat here the items we identified in our original Response of April s"' 2002. · • The proposed Wildlife Habitation Recovery Plan indicates that the return of two species of bird is all that is developers' mitigation can be expected to· allow. E-167 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states "Habitats for species which have been identified as endangered, threatened, or sensitive by the state or federal government shall not be reduced and should be preserved.· The wildlife figures that they have submitted, and which we dispute as incomplete, list 17 observed species, including mammals et. al. -of which two Priority Species (black tailed deer and ruffed grouse) and a Candidate Species (pileated woodpecker) were identified in the Wildlife Evaluation and Delineation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation, and Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Plan. U-131 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states • Urban residential neighborhood design should preserve historical and natural characteristics and neighborhood identity, while preserving privacy, community space, and safety and mobility of pedestrians and bicyclists. ODES Customer Information Bulletin 17 A refers to KCC 21 A 16 and says that • Appropriate use of landscaping promotes privacy, creates and visual and sound buffer, increases aesthetic value and deters erosion." City of Renton has indicated its Intent to supply sanitary sewer service on the express condition that "the property owner( s) will be required to execute a covenant to annex form'. In light of the Washington State Supreme Court ruling of March 14, 2002, we believe that the condition required by City of Renton in order to provide sanitary sewer constitutes a kind of prior restraint and is in direct conflict with this ruling. · We request a more stringent Wildlife Habitation Recovery Plan be required as provided by E-167 of the King County Comprehensive Plan. · We request that design changes be required to: • Preserve the existing conditions of privacy to the community • Create a Tree Preservation /Protection buffer along the west border of the subject parcel per the recommendations of our Arborisl. See attached Aborist Recommendations. • Require full landscape plan with street trees required on all (interior and exterior) street imorovements We request that the sewer concurrency statement be deemed invalid. Petition to Intervene: • I""\ • ill) Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Appllcatlons -L01P0()16 and L01TY401 T-316 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states 'King County should included nonmotorized transportation when general transportation improvements are made, induding road (JJ/ construction, reconstruction, subdivision development end development of new transit systems. T-317 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states 'New land use plans, subdivisions and urban planned development proposals should include enhancements to nonmotorized mobility and access. w T-318 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states 'King County design standards should allow flexibility In selecting, and the authority to require designed features that benefit nonmotorized safety and accessibility. T -321 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states 'King County should seek to improve pedestrian safety both within residential areas and at arterials near pedestrian activity centers such as schools, retail centers, concentrations of housing, transit facilities and trails .... To foster safe walking conditions for students, King County should continue the School Walkway Program. U-133 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states ' New urban residential developments should provide recreation space, community facilities and neighborhood circulation for nAtiestrians and bir.vdists. Additional Exhibits We request that the highest requirement for provision of facilities for nonmotorized transportation provided by law be required for these applications to be approved. Specifically: • provide increased safety and facility for pedestrians and bicyclists with bike lanes required on all (interior and exterior) street improvements o a siw,nalized crosswalk at 136'1' and 156 to provide safe access to the Briarwood King County Park o a signalized crosswalk at 136111 and 160th to provide safe access to walk to the local schools ·,1. .. J ~.,,,., ,.,ff Additional visual aids, maps and tables will be presented at the Public Hearing for clarification and reference by the neighbors who wish to testify. In general, these materials will be related to the data presented here, but additional resources may become available between the date of the Pre-Hearing Conference and that of the Public Hearing. PAnARnfR Pennit Application Infonnation -DDES, King County Washington ® King county llllil!ffl18 m i..tz1di34W 4i¥1i4,W --~NAt~t·~~l:9a~, . ..,c,;,bvi"~•~••1lllw~• > ODES Hom<p>ge Online Permit Detaii Permit Information: Activity No: AOOP0303 Permit Type: PREAPP-0 Sub-Type: FEASBL TY Title: JIM HANSEN SP Status: PENDING Process 10% Percent: Description: 3 LOT SP Applied/Opened: 10/17/2000 Contact Information: Applicant: HANSON, JIM Address: 17446 MALLARD COVE LANE MTVERON,WA 98274 Assigned Staff: Site Information: Location & 14010 154TH AVE Juris.: SE KC Community Plan: NEWCASTLE Comp Plan: URBAN RES 4-12AC Owner: Parcel No: 1463400062 (Link to Parcel Viewer Map) Link to: Parcel Reports Related Parcel/Permit Activity: Other Projects/Actions attached to this parcel List Date: February 16, 2003 King County I Permit Applications Report Engine I News I Services I Comments I Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The de!!III• http://www6.metrokc.gov/ddes/scripts/permdetail.cfm?permit_no=AOOP0303 Page 1 ofl 2/16/03 Pennit Application Infonnation • DOES, King County Washington c. ·~ ® Km~ «:oomi~ 1~ 1Mti1'i'l'.!IU iffi~m1ffij,tffl ~ ~M~.VJ.Q~~.~ ~ff ~.1111~l~~~t'1•~~1",~@ll~~~Q~~ Permit Information: Activity No: A02Pl\ll063 Permit Type: PREAPP-M Sub-Type: LUSD Status: PENDING Process 10% Percent: Description: PROPOSAL TO SUBDIVIDE PARCEL NUMBER 1023059390 (14.7 ACRES) INTO 26 SINGLE FAMIL Applied/Opened: 09/19/2002 • DDES llomtp>go Contact Information: Applicant: NORTHWARD HOMES Address: 1560 140TH NE BELLEVUE, WA 98005 Assigned Staff: Site Information: Location & 11813 148TH AVE Juris.: SE KC Community Plan: NEvilcASTLE Comp Plan: URBAN RES 4-12AC Owner: CRULL RICK H Parcel No: 1023059390 (Link to Parcel Viewer Map) Link to: Parcel Reports Related Parcel/Permit Activity: Other Projects/Actions attached to this parcel List Date: February 16, 2003 King County I Permit Applications Report Engine I News I Services I Comments I Search ' Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting 1hls and other King COUnty web page,,, you expr8S61y agree to be bound by terms and conditions of Iha Bite. Ih• de!aJla http://www6.metrokc.gov/ddes/scripts/penndetai1.cfin?pennit_ no=A02PM063 Pagel ofl 2/16/03 · Pennit Application Information -ODES, King County Washington . @) King County llllmlDII m-;14.:.;;;M M 1¥114,M ltB~UMl').I: qf Q-~oa~,.,-,,~,,·~~lll\tctlt$e.~ S llomep>ge Ollllline Permit Detaii Permit Information: Activity No: A03Pl\li013 Permit Type: PREAPP-M Sub-Type: LUSD Status: PENDING Process 10% Contact Information: Applicant: JEWETT, ALAN & SUSAN Address: 18144 SE 42ND PL ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 Percent: Ass' ed St ff· D · · b ·t I b ign a · escnpt1on: su m1 parce num er s·t I f . 4246000570 into two I e n ormation: lots. one existing Locatio~ & 16376 SE 40TH ST house. Juris.: KC· Applied/Opened: 02/07/2003 Community Plan: NEWCASTLE _ Comp Plan: URBAN RES 4-12AC Owner: JEWETT ALAN S+SUSAN E Parcel No: 4246000570 (Link to Parcel Viewer Map) Link to: Parcel Reports Related Parcel/Permit Activity: Other ProjectsfActions attached to this parcel List Date: February 16, 2003 King County I Permit Applications Report Engine I News I Services I Comments I Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you exl)feasly agree to be bound by terms and conditions or the Bite. The details, http://www6.metrokc.gov/ddes/scripts/penndetail.cfin?pennit_no=A03PM013 • Page 1 of 1 2/16/03 Permit Application Information -DOES, King County Washington •• •• ® King <Ccaa~ W#®fll itW~ffl ,1 a,§m1mw iMm1·1remd 'i'IWi¥Mfi ~ffl.~o;o.ll ~ff ij.t"'~l!!lli~n,,•-~l~$m•~~~~'-' Permit Information: Project No: BOOL 1276 Permit Type: DWELLING Sub-Type: SINGLE Status: PENDING Process 10% Percent: Description: TWO STORY, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE \MTH > DOES Homepage Contact Information: Applicant: YELKIN, GRIGORY Address: 3831 NE 140TH AVE BELLEVUE, WA 98005 Assigned Staff: Site Information: , Valuation: $364,860.00 Location & 16615 SE 43RD ST Juris.: KC Community Plan: NEVI/CASTLE · BASEMENT AND BASEMENT GARAGE Comp Plan: URBAN RES 4-12AC Owner: YELKIN, GRIGORY Parcel No: 1324059140 (Link to Parcel Viewer Map) Link to: Parcel Reports Related Parcel/Permit Activity: Applied/Opened: 09/11/2000 List all activities attached to this project BOOL 1276 Other Projects/Actions attached to this parcel List Date: February 16, 2003 King County I Permit Applications Report Engine I News I Services I Comments I Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By vis111ng 1h18 and other King County web pages, you expresaly agree to be bound by terms end conditions of the ette. The daCalla, http://www6.metrokc.gov/ddes/scripts/penndetail.cfm?permit_no=BOOLI276 Page 1 of I ' 2/16/03 Permit Application Information -ODES, King County Washington ® King County IDm!lll lllml!III ¥i4Hi•4¥ M 8¥!14,M Q11R~~-.. ,. .. ,:Qt·~~-.a~,1~4\iQ~l~nm.•Qttlle,~~ ,ooes-- 01111ine Permit DetaiB Permit Information: Contact Information: Project No: B02L 1675 Permit Type: DWELLING Sub-Type: SINGLE Title: LOT 2 KCSP 1080094 Applicant BEACH, VICTOR Address: PO BOX 187 RAVENSDALE, WA 98051 Assigned Staff: PINTACHA Status: PENDING Site Information: Process 10% Valuation: $220,129.00 Percent: Location & 14717 180TH AVE Description: NEW RESIDENCE & Juris.: SE _KC ATTACHED GARAGE Community Plan: NEWCASTLE {MECH INCL) Comp Plan: URBAN RES 4-12AC Applied/Opened: 10/02/2002 Owner. MILLER DUANE L Parcel No: 7230400535 (Link to Parcel Viewer Map) Link to: Parcel Reports Related Parcel/Permit Activity: List all activities attached to this project B02L1675 Other Projects/Actions attached to this parcel List Date: February 16, 2003 King County I Permit Applications Report Engine I News I Services I Comments I Search Linke to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. Jhedetana. · http://www6.metrokc.gov/ddes/scripts/penndetail.cfm?pennit_ no=B02L 1675 Page 1 oft 2/16/03 Permit Application Information -ODES, King County Washington c. •• ® Klnw <Cctlnll\l~ IM•J•'!t• l+?MW F?F'll id'1uf!llffi(Df ~·fHlf{~l!llJ\®,~: @!f ~-~i*.,_~, i~l!~,ti~~~.12!§'\\~@~ ~~~~ > DDES Homepage OB11~nne Perrmit Detail Permit Information: Project No: B03L0159 Permit Type: DWELLING Sub-Type: SINGLE Title: · GAMBLE NEW SFR Status: PENDING Process 10% Percent: Description: CONSTRUCT NEW 3 BEDROOM SFR W/ATTACHED GARAGE(MECH INCL) Applied/Opened: 02/07/2003 Contact Information: Applicant: GAMBLE, MIKE Address: 11624 164TH AVE SE Assigned Staff: Site Information: RENTON.WA 98059 Buildings: 1 Units: 1 Valuation: $239,763.00 Location & 9617 122ND AVE SE Juris.: KC Community Plan: NEWCASTLE Comp Plan: URBAN RES 4-12AC Owner: GAMBLE, MIKE Parcel No: 6625900020 (Link to Parcel Viewer Map) Link to: Parcel Reports Related Parcel/Permit Activity: List all actiyjties attached to this project B03L0159 Other Projects/Actions attached to this parcel List Date: February 16, 2003 King County I Permit Applications Report Engine I News I Services I Comments I Search Unka to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting tllis and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to ba bound by terms end conditions ol the site. Thedetaila http://www6.metrokc.gov/ddes/scripts/penndetail.cfm?pennit_ no=B03LO 159 Page 1 ~fl 2/16/03 . "2f SCOTT D. BAKER CONSUL TING ARBORISTS 2/8/03 Ms. Marsha Rollinger 15646 SE 1381h PL Renton, WA 98059 RE: Observations and comments regarding development plans for property that is adjacent to 1601h Ave SE in Renton WA, and also, shares a property corner with your neighborhood. Dear Marsha, . I'm glad we finally got to meet on February 1•1 when I came out to look at the property north of your neighborhood that is under development review by King County. I hope that my observations and comments are helpful to you in presenting a case that might result in a positive change to the eventual development plan. I was happy to see that the Development Company, Centurion Development Services, was willing to have Mr. Michael Romano meet with us. Mr. Romano was focused, during our limited discussion with him, on the issues that exist with trees along the south fence line given the current proposal for a ten-foot "buffer" along that property line. My intent in this letter is to comment on the development as a whole as well as the tree issues on the adjacent properties. The proposed development is to be built on a mostly flat 13 acre site with one existing residence. The property is currently zoned R-4, meaning that the land . may be divided to allow four residential dwellings per acre. The parcel has an area that has been designated as wetland at the northwest corner and is forested with a mixed stand of native trees, including Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), and bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), along with other native tree species and associated understory trees and shrubs. The property is within the Urban Growth Boundary of King County. In this area high density new development is required by the Growth Management Act in order to preserve open space in other areas. · The development planned under the R-4 zoning will allow 46 homes. The layout of the development at that density that you showed me is a simple cul de sac style neighborhood. The plan divides the 13-acre property into small lots, a large ~urface water detention tract, and a wetland area that is shown as the only (206) 528.4670 7018 47th Avenue NE• Seattle • WA • 98115 Rollinger letter 2-03.doc www.sdbca.com scottdb@attbi.com Page 1 of 4 --------------- . \" •. d SCOTT ID. BAKIEIR CONSUl Til\lG'\IRIBOIR!STS property that will not be disturbed. The lots run right up to the property line with no buffer. No trees are likely to be retained on the site outside the wetland area. The developer told us that no trees could be retained on the site. I would point out that this is essentially true given the layout of the lots, tendency to build homes right up to required setbacks, and the amount of required infrastructure. In fact, based on my experience, not only will all the trees be removed, but also most of the surface soil will be removed or destroyed by the development activities. My observation is that any large trees on adjoining properties near the property line that I saw (south line) would certainly be compromised by the development if the lots extend to the edge of the property. Many of your neighbors are worried that larger trees on their property would be at risk from the clearing of the adjacent site. Based on my knowledge and experience, I do not think that there is cause for concern, with the exception of the trees immediately adjacent to the development site property line. · You also told me that the developer is petitioning the County for a zoning change to R-6 that would allow the property in question to be split into 76 individual residential lots, an additional 30 homes! At this density, the developer has expressed willingness to extend sewer service to the development at their expense. When we spoke with Mr. Romano, he seemed to be indicating that a 10' "buffer" was something he could live with, although he mentioned a fence to prevent future homeowners from "landscaping" the buffer. He did not tell us if this "buffer" was intended for the R-4 or R-6 plan for the development. In my opinion, the Growth Management Act is a good idea in essence. Increased density can be used to preserve open space and agriculture in surrounding areas. However, looking at this example, I think that the result of this development proposal, at either R-4 or R-6 density, represents a very negative impact on the surrounding community. It is difficult to preserve existing forest, especially large trees, on any construction site. However, when trees and native vegetation are preserved successfully, value is added to a finished project. In a situation like this one where the developer is planing to build affordable homes, I think that preserving trees where possible provides a net benefit. Mr. Romano told us that he is building affordable homes and that the. development plan as presented is needed to do this. When I think about that comment, I wonder, does this mean that only those who can afford larger lots receive the benefits of the natural landscape? With the layout that I looked at for (206)528.4670 701847'"AvenueNE• Seattle• WA• 98115 Rollinger letter 2-03.doc www.sdbca.com scottdb@attlii.com Page 2 of 4 •. g SCOTT D. BAKER CONSUL TING ARBORISTS the site proposed at R-4, it is my opinion that most of the forest and all the benefits it brings will be lost. Worse, there is unlikely to be any room on the new properties to plant replacement trees that would provide canopy in the future neighborhood. It is surprising to me that King County is not requiring developers to plan their projects to include preservation of existing canopy and vegetation as a provision for guaranteeing large trees in the future neighborhood. In the scenario we are discussing, a large tract of natural forest that provides for retention and filtering of storm water that will eventually reach streams will be lost. Turf, rooftop, and pavement will dominate the likely landscape in this new "planned" neighborhood. One result of this engineered plan is the need for the detention pond to hold surface water. I see many of these "ponds" that are generally ugly, surrounded by fences, and quickly covered with invasive species such as Himalayan blackberry. In my opinion, they are not an amenity for people who will live in this neighborhood. · · The possibility exists to eliminate the large detention pond by using many small attractively landscaped bio-swales throughout the property. This approach has also seen success retrofitted into existing neighborhoods to deal with runoff problems, resulting in new construction that will serve our area well in the future. The proposal to increase the density even further to 76 homes is excessive, given the value of the resource that will be lost. I understand that the County would be asking the developer to extend the sewer out to the site as part of an agreement to up-zone. In my opinion, the choice to build giant centralized sewage treatment systems should be challenged Avoiding the huge costs and environmental impacts of regional sewage systems and asking developers to build small; decentralized systems to serve their · · projects, makes much better sense for our region's future. Allowing the density · ·oil 13 acres to be 76 homes so that the developer can afford to subsidize the County's sewage business is a bad idea! Well, I have strayed off my favorite subject, trees. As a developer with some ·experience myself, I would enjoy a debate that allowed us to look further at some 9( the points that I have made above. I think that it is possible to provide housing ~t a reasonable cost with a profitable bottom line for the developer while furthering sustainable communities. I'm hopeful that folks like us will be able to . influence King County to help instigate the changes that are needed to accomplish this. I do have the following comments regarding trees and some simple changes that may allow successful tree retention on this site at either d_e,nsity. · .. (2Q6) 528.4670 7018 47th Avenue NE• Seattle • WA • 98115 Rollinger letter 2-03.doc www.sdbca.com scottdb@attbi.com Page 3 of 4 . er • ,d SCOll D. BAKER CONSUL TIN~ARBOR!SlS 1. The ten-foot buffer along the south property line will not work. It is unlikely that any large trees on the development property can be retained with this approach. Mr. Romano described a strip 10' wide with a fence (to keep new owners from "landscaping" the "buffer"), and then a back yard. This seems like a very poor idea to me. 2. Wrth the loss of just four lots, a 50' deep buffer could be designed along the south property line. At this width a very attractive piece of remnant forest and related understory vegetation could remain along the property ·· line. Some of the trees along the inside edge of this buffer would be removed or snagged for safety. Fifty feet provides ample room for a protected root zone that will ensure the successful retention of selected trees. 3. I also think that the community covenants required by the County for the new neighborhood should call for new large trees to be planted and protected. This can be a marketing tool for the developer and adds value to the properties right away. I've noticed that in many new neighborhoods, few street trees are planted and that new large trees of any kind are rarely planted. The Real Estate industry tells us that trees add value. I have to . ask, where are the new trees going to come from? 4. Consider salvaging small trees and shrubs from the development site for re-use in new landscape buffers. Again, based on what I observed on our brief walk on Saturday, I do not think there is a risk to the larger trees that remained in your neighborhood due to the proposed new development. That being said, please be aware that large trees always present some risk during severe weather. I hope that you find this information helpful. If you have any questions, or if I can be of further assistance, please give me a call. Respectfully, Scott D. Baker, Consulting Arborist (206) 528.4670 7018 47'" Avenue NE• Seattle • WA • 98115 Rollinger letter 2,03.doc www.sdbca.com scottdb@attbi.com Page 4 of 4 Pennit Application Information -ODES, King County Washington ® Kmg County • ;j,j .. ,§ m W3§fii%4M ±5¥ii4,W , DOES Homepage Online Permit Detail Permit Information: Project No: B03L0130 Permit Type: DWELLING Sub-Type: SINGLE Title: LOT 13 BLK2 GERBERS ADON RENT Status: PENDING Process 10% Percent: Description: CONSTRUCT NEW 4 BEDROOM SFR W/ATTACHED GARAGE(MECH INCL) Applied/Opened: 02/03/2003 Contact Information: Applicant RILEY JOHN Address: 12414 149TH A VE SE Assigned Staff: Site Information: RENTON WA 98055 Buildings: 1 Units; 1 Valuation: $289,029.00 Location & 12417 150TH AVE Juris.: SE KC Community Plan: NEWCASTLE Comp Plan: URBAN RES 4-12AC Owner: RILEY JOHN Parcel No: 2739200260 (Unk to Parcel Viewer Map) Link to: Parcel Reports Related Parcel/Permit Activity: List all activities attached to this project B03L0130 Other ProjectslActions attached to this parcel List Date: February 16, 2003 King County I Permit Applications Report Engine I News I Services I Comments I · Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pagee, you expr868fy agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The detailt, . http://www6.metrokc.gov/ddes/scripts/penndetail.cfm?pennit_n<FB03L0130 Page 1 ofl 2/16/03 Pennit Application Information -DDES, King County Washington C• •• ® Kl!ri19J ~MV fM·!ii-lM$mj F#'OM'J.'i ll®1'.iiUQ§i\W ·rt iA\ffll\i . li~-~~ .• ~i ~Q l®<!i!miiR~l\i!m'imt,1~ Jil@ijl"'n.~,~~a:l!l~l- Permit Information: Project No: B03L0083 Permit Type: DWELLING Sub-Type: SINGLE Title: L-131 KCBLA LOOM0046 Status: PENDING Process 10% Percent: Description: SFR W/GARAGE, DECKS & COVERED PORCH Applied/Opened: 01/23/2003 , DDES llomopago Contact Information: Applicant PARK LANE HOMES, INC. Address: 4957 LAKEMONT BLVD C-4 #293 BELLEVUE, WA 98006 Assigned Staff: PINTJKEN Site Information: ., Valuation: $577,307.00 Location & 7015 169TH AVE SE Juris.: KC · · Community Plan: NE\11,CASTLE Comp Plan: URBAN RES 1DU/AC Owner: PARK LANE HOMES, INC. Parcel No: 2524059131 (Link to Parcel Viewer Map) Link to: Parcel Reports Related Parcel/Permit Activity: List all activities attached to this project B03L0083 Other Projects/Actions attached to this parcel List Date: February 16, 2003 King County I Permit Applications Report Engine I News I Services I Comments I Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting Ihle and othar King County web pages. you expressly agree to be bound by terms and concitfons of the alte. The detallo. . http://www6.metrokc.gov/ddes/scripts/permdetail.cfm?pennit_no=B03L0083 Page 1 oft 2/16/03 ·. Permit Application Information -ODES, King County Washington .ftiffiii9,M • DOES Homep- Online Permit Detarn Permit Information: Project No: B02L0645 Permit Type: DWELLING Sub-Type: SINGLE Title: HARRIS SFR Status: PENDING Process 10% Percent: Description: CONSTRUCT NEW SFR W/ATIACHED GARAGE(MECH INCL) Applied/Opened: 04/18/2002 Contact Information: Applicant: HARRIS-WILLIAM E Address: 4548 186TH AVE SE ISSAQUAHWA 98027 Assigned Staff: Site Information: Buildings: 1 Units: 1 Valuation: $299,248.00 Location & 4370 164TH WAY SE Juris.: KC Community Plan: NEV\iCASTLE Comp Plan: URBAN RES 4-12AC O.rmer: HARRIS WILLIAM E Parcel No: 1424059140 (Link to Parcel Viewer Map) Link to: Parcel Reports Related Parcel/Permit Activity: List all activities attached to this project B02L0645 Other Projects/Actions attached to this parcel List Date: February 16, 2003 King County I Permit Applications Report Engine I News I Services I Comments I Search Links to external sites do not constitute endoJSementa t,v King county. By vlslting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and concfrtions of the site. The details http://www6.metrokc.gov/ddes/scripts/pe~detai1.cfin?permit_no=B02L0645 Pagel ofl: 2/16/03 Pennit Application Information -ODES, King County Washington er •• ® e<mg <eoo~ l~ twrmil 4iYWNi i@•1nm1~ml li4t®i®ijiJ ~~Jt~4'~,t, Qi~~~,a~iwmfl~tl1.-.~ ~ijVlffiri\~~~l~wl~, , DOES Homepage Oll1linlrlle Permot Detarn Permit Information: Project No: B01 L0927 Pennit Type: DWELLING Sub-Type: SINGLE Title: E100 OF S150 SE NW 13-24-05 Status: PENDING Process 10% Percent: Contact Information: Applicant: WOLTER, THOMAS Address: 2409 153RD AVE SE BELLEVUE, WA 98007 Assigned Staff: PINTMPHA Site Information: Buildings: , 1 Units: 1 Valuation: $676,240.00 location & 17126 SE 43RD ST Juris.: KC Community Plan: NEWCASTLE Description: NEW 3-STORY SINGLE FAMILY WITHATIACHED GARAGEAND DECK/COVERED PORCH; RETAINING Applied/Opened: 07/24/2001 Comp Plan: URBAN RES 4-12AC Owner: WOLTER, THOMAS Parcel No: 1324059043 (Link to Parcel Viewer Map) Link to: Parcel Reports Related Parcel/Permit Activity: List all activities attached to this project B01L0927 Other Projects/Actions attached to this parcel List Date: February 16, 2003 King County I Pennit Applications Report Engine I News I Services I Comments I Search Links to external sit et do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this end other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The delpjls http://www6.metrokc.gov/ddes/scripts/permdetail.cfin?permit_ no=BO IL0927 Page 1 oft 2/16/03. Pennit Application Information -DDES, King County Washington H#ii9,M Online Permit Detaii Permit Information: Project No: B02L1062 · Permit Type: DWELLING Sub-Type: MOBILE Title: TL22 of NE NW 13- 22-05 Status: PENDING Process 10% Percent: Description: install double-wide mobile home -1978 Commander, 66'x 28', 3 bedrooms and decks Applied/Opened: 06/13/2002 Contact Information: Applicant: CANDLER, JEFF Address: 16915 SE 128TH ST RENTON, WA 98059 Assigned Staff: pintmpha Site Information: Buildings: 1 Units: 1 Valuation: $10,850.00 Location & 16818 SE 132ND ST Juris.: KC Community Plan: NEWCASTLE Comp Plan: URBAN RES 4-12AC Owner: CANDLER, JEFF Parcel No: 1323059022 (Link to Parcel Viewer Map) Link to: Parcel Reports Related Parcel/Permit Activity: List all activities attached to this project B02L 1062 Other Projects/Actions attached to this parcel List Date: February 16, 2003 King County I Permit Applications Report Engine I News I Services I Comments I · Search Links to external eltes do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details http://www6.metrokc.gov/ddes/scripts/permdetail.cfm?permit_ no=B02L 1062 Page 1 of 1 2/16/03 Permit Application Report-DOES, King County, Washington .{'\ •• ) ® Kin~ (CcQ.o~ IEiiiX_ !.~Mi ll§!'IJ'!ffltl:1i p,1mt\FlWil \Wf¥*'ttifi'\ll ~-~f~.\l (l!\ff l~wtDlO)@~~,lt@q-J,~\. ;~,,d~~-~-t lk"{· >DOES~ On~nl!1le IP'eli'mit Appiicatuonis fRepoli't ~ Search Results for: Permit Group: PreHmloary Plat/PUD AppHcmtions Permit Status: All Pending Applications Under Review Page I of I Urban/Rural: All Community: Newcastle Jurisdiction: All Reported through: February 11, 2003 A/P/D No Permit Urban Project litle/Descriplion Applied Status Applicant Type Rural LOOP0024 PRE-PLAT URBAN ASTER PARK 11/14/2000 RET/WCI US LAND DEVELOPMEN L01P0016 PRE-PLAT URBAN EVENDELL PRE PLAT&REZONE 07/06/2001 ~~H-US LAND DEVELOPMEN L02P0005 PRE-PLAT URBAN EAST RENTON 04/03/2002 RET/WCI CAM WEST DEVELOPMI 05/30/2002 RET/WCI KBS Ill LLC L02P0011 PRE-PLAT URBAN HAMILTON PLACE L02P0014 PRE-PLAT URBAN SHAMROCK SUBDIVISION 08/01/2002 RET/WCI CAMWEST DEVELOPME List Date: February 16, 2003 King County DOES I New Application Search I News I Services I Comments I Search Links to external sH:e& do not constib.rte endorsements by King County. By visiting U,Js and oHler King County web pages, you expressty agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. Toti details. http://www6.metrokc.gov/ddes/scripts/pennlist.cfin . 2/16/03 Permit Application Information -DOES, King County Washington . ® King County ~ 1 gm...p i-i§d\%49 4%114,M ~M~•~t ~f t•~tl~Rl\lf!~.t ,-,.~: ll\"'i~r,,m•"til!il"~- > DDES Homep>9< Online Permit Detail Permit Information: Project No: L02P0005 Permit Type: PRE-PLAT Sub-Type: PRE-PLAT Title: EAST RENTON Status: RET/WCI Process 10% Percent: Description: EAST RENTON PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 148TH AVE SE. SITE CONSISTS OF TWO PARCELS TOT Applied/Opened: 04/03/2002 Contact Information: Applicant: CAM WEST DEVELOPMENT Address: 9720 NE 120TH PL #100 KIRKLAND, WA 98034 Assigned Staff: LHEN PDYE Site Information: No. Lots: 66 Location & KC Juris.: Community Plan: NEWCASTLE Comp Plan: URBAN RES 4-12AC Owner: SCHIRMAN MICHAEL +WOLF CYNTH Parcel No: 1023059023 (Link to Parcel Viewer Map) Link to: Parcel Reports Related Parcel/Permit Activity: List all activities attached to this project L02P0005 Other Projects/Actions attached to this parcel List Date: February 16, 2003 King County I Permit Applications Report Engine I News I Services I Comments I · Search Links to external eltes do not constiMe endorsements by t(jng County. By visiting thte and other King COunty web pages, you expreesty agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The dolails. http://www6.metrokc.gov/ddes/scripts/permdetail.cfin?permit_no=L02P0005 Page I ofl 2/16/03 Pennit Application Infonnation -ODES, King County Washington •• 1)9 Permit Information: Contact Information: Project No: L02P0011 Permit Type: PRE-PLAT Sub-Type: PRE-PLAT Applicant: KBS 11.1 LLC Address: 12505 BEL-RED RD #212 Title: HAMIL TON PLACE Status: RET/WCI BELLEVUE, WA98005 Process 10% Assigned Staff: KCLA BWHI Site Information: Percent · Description: Applied/Opened: 05/30/2002 No. Lots: 23 Location & Kc· Juris.: Community Plan: NEVVCASTLE Comp Plan: URBAN RES 4-12AC Owner: HAMIL TON MARY E Parcel No: 3664500100 (Link to Parcel Viewer Map) Link to: Parcel Reports Related Parcel/Permit Activity: List all activities attached to this project L02P0011 Other Projects/Actions attached to this parcel List Date: February 16, 2003 King County I Permit Applications Report Engine I News I Services I Comments I Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By viaitlng 1hls and other King County web pages, you expressty agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details http:l/www6.metrokc.gov/ddes/scripts/penndetail.cfin?pennit_ no=L02POOI I Page 1 of,1 2/16/03 Pennit Application Information -ODES, King County Washington Pagel ofl ® King County W:f.foi· •. Wi¥iHlN ~M~m,t&l Qi' a...lt~g..-g•,..t, ,.,«#, ta~"itql).m~n-• $.Q~~- s I lor,.es::rage Permit Information: Project No: L02P0014 Permit Type: PRE-PLAT Sub-Type: PRE-PLAT Online Permit Detail Contact Information: Applicant CAMWEST DEVELOPMEN. INC. Title: SHAMROCK SUBDIVISION Address: 9720 NE 120TI PLACE, SUITE 100 Status: RET/WCI Process 10% KIRKLAND, W1 Percent: 98034 Description: SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL NUMBERS Assigned Staff: KCLA BWHI 102305-9040, Site Information: . 9304,9319,9174,9384,9415,9030,9022,91 No. Lots: 118 Applied/Opened: 08/01/2002 Location & KC Juris.: Community Plan: NE\NCASTLE Comp Plan: URBAN RES 4 12AC Related Parcel/Permit Activity: Owner. BALES LTD P~ Parcel No: 1023059040 (Link to Parcel Viewer Map) Link to: Paree/ Reports List all activities attached to this project L02P0014 Other Projects/Actions attached to this parcel List Date: February 16, 2003 King County I Permit Applications Report Engine I ~ I Services I Comments I Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressty agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the aite. The details http://www6.metrokc.gov/ddes/scripts/penndetail.cfin?permit_ no=L02POO 14 2/16/03 Pennit Application Infonnation -ODES, King County Washington •• •• ® Km~ <Cowlwtw !fiUlfi1M fflil'i\l•b®I ~- ~'"IF\~~o:o,t ~i IQ:,~~nt,~ffllt~~,ij~ff~I/J\m~~tz ~IN~~, Permit Information: Activity No: A99P3025 Permit Type: PREAPP-0 Sub-Type: FEASBL TY Title: HARBOR HOMES PREAPP-PLAT Status: PENDING Process 10% Percent: Description: 77 LOT PLAT IN 10- 23-5 > DOES Homepogo Contact Information: Applicant: BARGi-lAUSEN CONSULT ENGRS, INC. Address: 1821572NDAVES KENT, WA 98032 Assigned Staff: Site Information: Location & 11813 148TH AVE Juris.: SEKC Community Plan: NEVI/CASTLE Applied/Opened: 0612511999 Comp Plan: URBAN RES 4-12AC Owner: HARBOR HOMES Parcel No: 1023059390 (Link to Parcel Viewer Map) Link to: Parcel Reports Related Parcel/Permit Activity: Other Projects/Actions attached to this parcel List Date: February 16, 2003 King County I Permit Applications Report Engine I News I Services I Comments I Search Links to external sttea do not constitute endorsements by King county. By visiting thla and other King County web pages, you expressty agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. Ib• details, http://www6.metrokc.gov/ddes/scripts/penndetail.cfm?pennit_ no=A99P3025 Page 1 o,f 1 2/16/03 ·. Perm~t Application Information -DDES, King County Washington .• King County .,_ 4i44i!i34-W 41i8ii4,W !IMP~.~~~-Qf QI\Wei~RJ'Mnl-.•dti~~"-@•ftt\llii•"k~ • ODES Homep>ge Onlill1e Permit Detaii Permit Information: Activity No: A99P3154 Permit Type: PREAPP-0 Sub-Type: FEASBL TY Status: PENDING Process 10% Percent Description: FORMAL PLAT/POSSIBLE REZONE Applied/Opened: 11/23/1999 Contact Information: Applicant: U.S. DEVELOPMENT COMPANY-o/oCEN Address: 22617 8TH DR SE BOTHELL, WA 98021 Assigned Staff: · Site Information: Location & 13615154TH AVE Juris.: SE KC Community Plan: NEIIVCASTLE Comp Plan: URBAN RES 4-12AC Owner: MORGON, HENRY Parcel No: 1463400005 (Link to Parcel Viewer Map) Link to: Paree/ Reports Related Parcel/Permit Activity: Other Projects/Actions attached to this parcel List Date: Februaiy 16, 2003 King County I Permit Applications Report Engine I News I Services I Comments I Search Links to external aitee do not constitute endorsement& by King County. By visiting thla and other King County web pagaa, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the Bite. Thedetallo. http://www6.metrokc.gov/ddes/scripts/permdetai1.cfm?permit_ no=A99P3154 Page 1 of 1 2/16/03 Permit Application Information -DDES, King County Washington •• • • . • King <Coomw ~ i@11,:1ffl'ii;@Wffiitt1r,1J. ~iw·~~.,,1t~·,-~•@i~ffl\@.i,~~~~~ffif!~~~~~~ > DOES Homopoga Permit Information: Contact Information: Project No: LOOP0024 Permit Type: PRE-PLAT Sub-Type: PRE-PLAT Title: ASTER PARK Status: RET/1/VCI Process 10% Applicant: US LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOC. Address: C/0 CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SERV 22617 8TH DR SE BOTHELL, WA 98021 Percent: Description: Applied/Opened: 11/14/2000 Assigned Staff: LHEN iVIBER Site Information: No. Lots: 37 Location & KC Juris.: Community Plan: NEWCASTLE Comp Plan: URBAN RES 4-12AC Owner: MAARTIN, CURTIS N & BEVERLY J Parcel No: 0323059026 (Link to Parcel Viewer Map) Link to: Parcel Reports Related Parcel/PermitActivity: List all activities attached to this project LOOP0024 Other Projects/Actions attached to this parcel List Date: February 16, 2003 King County I Permit Applications Report Engine I News I Services I Comments I · Search. Links to external Bites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting 1111a end other King County web pages. you expressly agree to be bound by terma and conditions of the site. The detaila http://www6.metrokc.gov/ddes/scripts/permdetail.cfm'lpennit_no=LOOP0024 Page I of I 2/16/03 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-03-004, A,PZ, ECF/ BALES ANNEXATION AND PREZONE ,. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City of Renton, in response to a 10% Petition to Annex, is proposing to authorize an annexation election for the proposed Bales Annexation. The subject site is an 8.52-acre area generally located between NE 4'" Street (SE 128'" St) on the north and SE 1301h Street (if extended) on the south, 152"" Avenue SE (if extended) on the west, and 155'" Avenue SE (if extended) on the east. It abuts the City of Renton boundary on its north and west. The proposed City zoning for the subject annexation site is R-5 Zone, allowing up to 5 dwelling units per net acre. This is comparable to King County's current R-4 zoning which allows up to 4 dwelling units per gross acre. A concurrent prezone from the County's R-4 Zone to Renton's R-5 Zone is also being processed as a part of this application. Future zoning would allow up to approximately. 34 single-family detached dwellings on the 8.52-acre annexation site. PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed annexation is located on th13 south ·side of NE 41 " Street SE across the street from the Morrison Annexation/Maureen Subdivision, west of White Fence Ranch. It abuts the City of Renton to its north along NE4th Street and to its west. PUBLIC APPROVALS: Annexation, Prezone, and Environmental Review for Prezone \~ \_, a i a N Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Donald Erickson, AICP, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on January 29'". 2003. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Don Erickson at ( 425) 430-6581. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. ~ PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NIJMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: January 15, 2003. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January 15, 2003 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: January 15, 2003 Sally Nipert 14004156thAve SE Renton WA 98059 Richard and Anita Oliphant 16519 SE 145th Renton WA 98059 Dave Olson 16206 SE 134th Renton WA 98059 Kenneth and Dorothy Olson 16210 SE 134th St Renton WA 98059 Bruce Osgoodby Sr. 13456156 Ave Se Renton WA 98059 Michael S. Otis 14521166th Pl SE Renton WA 98059 Warren and Sara Pape 13420 162nd Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Roger Paulson 15657 SE 139 PL Renton WA 98059 Gloria Peters 13025 158th Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Dan and Lynn Peterson 13118158thAveSE Renton WA 98059 Dave Petrie 811 S 273rd CT Des Moines WA 98198 Kathleen Quimet 140381561hAve SE Renton WA 98059 Harold and Roxaine Reynolds 13016 156th Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Dorothy Riley 14525167th Pl SE Renton WA 98059 C ,rPavid Rozymalski . 6511 SE 145th St Renton WA 98059 K Sarquist 14204 160th Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Richard Savage 12909158th Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Geneva D. Scholes 12924158thAve SE Renton WA 98059 Charles and Viola Scoby 13112158thAveSE Renton WA 98059 Jeff and Karen Sidebotham 13004158thAve SE Renton WA 98059 Gary and J.Y. Smith 14504 166th Pl SE Renton WA 98059 Gerald Smith 8524 s. 125th Renton WA 98055 Neal Speer 12914158th Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Eloise Stachowiak 15652 SE 139th PL Renton WA 98059 Gary Stanford 13111 160th Ave SE Renton WA 98059 David Stevens 15910 SE 142nd St Renton WA 98059 SamTacher 15514 SE 132nd ST Renton WA 98059 Barbara J. Thomas 14537166th Pl SE Renton WA 98059 tr" Penny, Dave and DJ Thorbeck \.._ .5650 SE 138th PL · Renton WA 98059 Rene and Lilly Threadwell 14005 133rd ST Renton WA 98059 Russ Waterhouse 12925 158th Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Sally and Gary Williams 13204 156th Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Terri R. Williams 13421 163rd Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Harold and Eleanor Zeek 16621 SE 145th Renton WA 98059 Constance and Richard Allen S"' ... ,;me Day ~· ,, Ann Huniu 13411 168rd Ave SE 1 .2 167th Pl SE ,, •2 SE 139 PL Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Robin and Donna Allred Esther Delp Frady and Helga Jaques 13412163rd Ave SE 12820 156th Ave SE 13114158th Ave Se Renton WA98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Jennifer Armstrong Brent Flatau and Doryan Jarcell Leonard Johnston 16613 SE 145th ST 11453163rd Ave SE 16016 SE 135th ST Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Bret Bowden Wendy Downs Don and Diane Kezele 13814 160th Ave SE 13825 156th Avenue SE 15657 SE 137 PL Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Rhonda Bryant Danielle and Davis Eckstrom David Kupcho 15406 SE 136th 156thAve SE 13110158thAve SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Carolyn Ann Buckett Bob Elwell Alice Lee 16524 SE 145 ST 16020 SE 130th St 16304 SE 135th Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Marilynn Carlson Debbie Erickson Tim and Gina Lex 13616 156th Ave SE 16031 SE 135th ST 13116158th Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Jeff Casebeer Dale and Don Fisher Fred and Gloria A Martin 14051 156th Ave SE 13155 158th Ave SE 13019 160th Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Calvin and Barbara Chin Roxi and J.S. Greider Kerrie Mason 14517 157th Pl SE 13420 163rd Ave SE 13111156thAve SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Paula Chipman Donald Helms James and Patricia McDougal 14210171st Ave SE 13404162nd Ave SE 14502 167th Pl SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Ray Conwell Bud, June and Kris Hill Delores Menking 13006158th Ave SE 13527 156th Ave SE 13415 163rd Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Michael Cooke Ed and Nancy Hilton Don D. Milbrath 13125158thAve SE 13414158th Ave SE 15624 SE 137th PL Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Mark and Gail Costello Laurie Hindes Kathryn Monroe 13012 158th Ave SE 14115 160 Ave SE 14131 160th Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Lona Crosslin Randy Homer Martha Newton 15430 SE 132nd ST 13404 160 Ave SE 14518 167th Pl SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 East Drainage Basin: Bruce Whittaker 12/16/2002 Proposed SEP A Drainage Condition Evendell LO 1 POO 16 The 160th Ave SE downstream conveyance system shall be upgraded to provide for the 100-year storm capacity. Downstream driveway culverts/ditches and a cross-culvert under 1601h Ave SE shall be improved. Culverts P-117 and P-116 on the west side of 1601h Ave SE, cross-culvert P-115, and culverts P-114 and P-113 on the east side of 160'h Ave SE shall be improved. The culvert designations are according to the Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis by Haozous Engineering dated August 26, 2002. Bank and channel stabilization is also required in the unopened right-of-way for 162nd Ave SE, in the vicinity of the easterly line of Lot 12, Rich Lea Crest(address 16046 SE 142nd St.). The culverts and channel described are located from the south site boundary to a distance of approximately 1700 feet downstream. · Level 2 Flow Control design is required for the proposed stormwater detention facility. West Drainage Basin: The stormwater detention facilities shall be designed to the Level 3 Flow Control Standard as described in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual(KCSWDM). As an option, Level 2 Flow Control with downstream improvements can be proposed according to Core Requirement 2 of the KCSWDM. The minimum Flow Control Standard shall be Level 2. '® Ki,19 County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division Drop-Off f0,LUSD ONLY Cover Sheet .· 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 TTY (206) 296-7217 Alternative formats available upon request Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division **************************** IMPORTANT ***************************** PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY FOR ALL DROP-OFFS Project No.: ,L. t? l? tfltJ / b Project Name: lj.ervO.CLL . ~v'~~ Oe:J/ $'VC.{ FROM: 111(4..rt... .r. ,e-,.GNO Company Name ipon~ct Person Telephone No.: f!LZ_tL c/f6· U-fo:? TO: J:",q,ep,.; ~ Date Received by LUSD CTS)fE~~~W~f(y ln} DEC O 9 2002 [1lj K.C. D.D.E.S. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please print) Short Pia Plats Please spe m(s) dropped-off: .MP.t:M2Y<d, ff) ,~ 3 Lot Line Adjustment Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Right of Way Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Clearing / Grading Permit Additional information requested; please specify item(s) dropped-off: l:J<hlblt No. J -5 Imm No. bei 1ppoJJ" ::t: R@G~iv~d $ ·to -C53 U.r, "1'1oJ King Cll!Ynty Hearing Examiner RECE\\/ED gE.C O 9 7.lllll Other:----------------·--------------------- PLEASE NOTE: All drop-off item(s) will be logged into the computer under the project number, therefore, it is important that the top portion of this form is completed properly before you· drop-off anything. Assistance in finding a project number can be provided by speaking to a Land Use Services Division Person of the Day (POD) or the Zoning/Land Use Technician. Your cooperation is important. Thank you. LUSD Drop-Off Cover Sheet lg-cvs-dropoff.pdf 05-30-2002 ...... Robert H. Darrow, P.E. /3428. 45th Court Mukilteo, WA 98275 fax (425) 742-8488 (415) 745-5872 December 5, 2002 Mr. Michael Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 8th Drive SE Bothell, WA 98021 RE: Additionii.i.· Information Request Bring, P.IS. Edward J. McCarthy, Ph.D., P.E, 148/6 SE /16th Street Renton, WA 98059 fax (415) 254-0579 (425) 235-2707 Application No. L01TY401 & L01P0016-Evendell Dear Mr. Romano: This letter is in response to an information request.by DDES in their letter dated November 26, 2002. I have analyzed additional drainage complaints in the downstream Evendell basins that were recently released by DDES .. Toe analysis presented below includes proposed mitigations for.the downstream problems per Core Requirement 2 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. Drainage Complaints Drainage complaints along the downstream systems from Evendell were investigated at King County Water and Land Resource Division as part of the Level 1 Downstream Drainage Analysis submitted with the project's preliminary technical information report (TIR)(Haozous Engineering, June 2001). However, since the preliminary TIR was prepared, the following drainage complaints and claim information have been released by DDES: Complaint ID Date of Address of Type of Flooding/Description · Complaint Complaint KCDOT Action 12/13/01 13814 160tn Nuisance Flooding -Ditch on west side Request 01-Avenue SE of 160th Ave SE overtopped road and 005339 flooded the owner's driveway and yard. Complaint 97-1/7/97 1402,8 160"' Severe Flooding -Capacity of pipe 0203 Avenue SE system in front of house was exceeded. Water overtopped ditch, and flooded road and ground level floor of home. Mr. Mike Romano December 5, 2002 Page2 Complaint ID Claim31249 Claim21860 Complaint 97- 0318 Claim21699 Date of Complaint 1/29/02 1/25/97 1/21/97 1/10/97 Address of Complaint 14028 160"' Avenue SE 14028 160"' Avenue SE 14038 156tn Avenue SE 14038 156"' Avenue SE Type of Flooding/Description Severe Flooding -Capacity of pipe system in front of house was exceeded. Water overtopped ditch, and flooded road and ground level floor of home. Severe Flooding -Capacity of pipe system in front of house was exceeded. Water overtopped ditch, and flooded road and ground level floor of home. Severe Flooding -Inlet pipe in front of house overtopped and flooded basement. Severe Flooding -Inlet pipe in front of house overtopped and flooded basement. I have also provided additional information regarding the following drainage complaint that was presented in the TIR for the project (Haozous Engineering, June 2001 ): Complaint 97-1/10/97 16046 SE Severe Erosion -Soil eroded from bank 0206 142°dPlace is deposited 50 -100 feet downstream and contributes to ditch overtopping and garage flooding. Analysis of Complaints The complaints and claims listed in the table above document problems that occurred along the downstream conveyance systems from the proposed Evendell plat. The complaints were filed by property owners due to flooding caused by inadequate capacity of conveyance structures. The hydraulic structures at the locations of each complaint were evaluated as part of the Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis (Haozous Engineering, August 26, 2002) prepared for the Evendell Plat. KCDOT Action Request 01-005339 was filed on 12/13/01 by Mr. Bret Bowden, a resident at 13814 160th Avenue SE. The ditch on the west side of 160th Avenue SE overtopped the road and flooded the complainant's driveway and yard. King County Mr. Mike Romano December 5, 2002 Page3 DOT responded to Mr. Bowden's action request and cleaned the ditches on both sides of the road. The flooding that motivated Mr. Bowden's call to the county was apparently caused by a blockage in the ditch. Two driveway culverts on the west side of 160th Avenue SE, across from Mr. Bowden's property, were modeled in the Level 3 ·Downstream Drainage Analysis. The culverts, identified as Pl 16 and Pl 17 in the drainage analysis, were predicted to flood at a 2-year return period. Flooding at these culverts could create a backwater condition in the ditch, thereby causing water to sheetflow onto Mr. Bowden's property, as did occur when the ditch was blocked. This type of flooding would likely be classified as a "nuisance" problem by the King County · Surface Water Design Manual. · Complaint 97-0203, Claim 31249, and Claim 21860 relate to flooding that has occurred at the residence located at 14028 160th Avenue SE. Flooding at this location has been a recuning problem. Both 160th Avenue SE and a residential structure are subject to flooding. On at least two occasions in the past, the culverts in front of the property have overtopped. When flooding occurs, stormwater flows down the driveway and into the garage and ground level floor of the home. This problem is considered both a "severe building" and a "severe road" flooding problem by the King County Surface Water Design Manual. The Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis predicted flooding occurs in front of this residence at a 2-year return period. Flooding is caused by undersized culverts at locations Pl 13, Pl 14, and Pl JS. Complaint 97-0318 and Claim 21699 were filed by the property owner located at 14038 156th Avenue SE. A 12-inch diameter inlet pipe to a conveyance system, identified as POOI in the Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis, is located in front of the complainant's property. Stormwater in the easterly ditch of 156th Avenue SE overtops the 12-inch diameter inlet pipe and flows down the owner's driveway and into her basement. Flooding has occurred on more than one occasion and has resulted in damage to the owner's washer, dryer, and water heater. This flooding problem is considered a "severe building" problem by the King County Surface Water Design Manual. Based on the Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis, the 12-inch diameter inlet pipe in front of the property is predicted to overtop at a 2-year return period. Lastly, a "severe" channel erosion problem is located in the downstream system on the east boundary of the pro~ located at 16046 SE 142nd Place. The channel is within the right-of-way of SE 162° Avenue. Channel bank erosion that is occurring at this location could be depositing in a flat section of channel 50 to 100 feet downstream from the eroded area. Sediments in the channel could be contributing to flooding as documented in Complaint 97-0206. In my field visit of the site, Mr. Don Gragg, the property owner, described flooding that impacted his garage in the past. A 4-inch pipe drains a catch basin in the driveway near the garage. The invert of this pipe is only 1.4 feet above the bottom of the channel. It appears that when the channel fills, water backs up in the pipe. and floods Mr. Gragg's driveway and garage. Minor channel improvements at this · Mr. Mike Romano December 5, 2002 Page4 location would likely improve the existing flooding/erosion and sedimentation problem. Alternatively, changes to the configuration of the 4-inch diameter drain pipe could prevent further flooding of the driveway and garage. Proposed Mitigations Level 2 detention standards are required on the Evendell site, and were included in the preliminary drainage plan for the proposed plat. Prior to receiving recently released flooding information from DOES, described above, we had considered the flooding to be a "nuisance" problem and did not propose mitigations in addition to the Level 2 detention standards. In light of the new information, additional stormwater mitigations will be needed as part ofthe Evendell Drainage plan to conform with the King County Surface Water Design Manual. Drainage Problems at 13814 and 14028 160th Avenue SE For the severe flooding problem at 14028 160th Avenue SE, I recommend upgrading the downstream system as opposed to adopting onsite Level 3 detention standards. In my opinion, in this situation, upgrading the conveyance system along 160th Ave SE by eliminating constrictions, would provide more benefit to the neighborhood and surrounding properties than would adopting a more stringent onsite detention standard. By upgrading the system, the existing "severe roadway" flooding problem would be fixed, as would the existing "severe building" flooding at the residence located at 14028 160th Ave SE. Proposed upgrades would also solve the nuisance flooding problem at 13814 160th Avenue SE. While adopting onsite Level 3 detention standards would conform to requirements in the Surface Water Design Manual, only conveyance upgrades would fix the existing problems. Pipes that would need to be upgraded would include the following: • Two driveway culverts on the west side of 160th Ave SE (Pl 16 and Pl 17) • Cross culvert under 160th Ave SE (Pl 15) • Culvert immediately upstream the property at 14028 160th Ave SE (Pl 14) • Existing 18-inch diameter pipe at 14028 160th Ave SE (Pl 13) Upsizing these pipes would prevent the ditch from overtopping. Stormwater would be contained in the roadside ditch and would not be allowed to flow across the road or onto adjacent properties, as has occurred in the past at 13814 and 14028 160th Avenue SE. Drainage Problem at 14038 156th Avenue SE For the severe flooding problem at 14038 156th Avenue SE, either onsite Level 3 detention standards could be adopted in place of Level 2 standards or the capacity of the Mr. Mike Romano December 5, 2002 Page 5 existing 12-inch inlet pipe could be increased. Increasing the capacity of the 12-inch inlet pipe would likely entail upsizing at least 115 feet of 12-inch diameter pipe. By upsizing this reach of pipe to 18-inch diameter and increasing the head above its crown at the inlet, the capacity of the inlet pipe would be increased. The frequency of flooding would be reduced from a 2-year return period, to approximately a 10-year return period. Drainage Problem at 16046 SE 142"d Place For the severe erosion problem along the east boundary of the property at 16046 SE 142"d Place, the proposed Level 2 RID standards provide the mitigation required by code. Other types of mitigations to reduce erosion at this location, such as bank stabilization in the eroded section of channel or Level J RID standards, can be imposed through the King County Surface Water Drainage Manual under certain circumstances. Cleaning sediment out of the flat section of channel and stabilizing the eroding banks immediately upstream would reduce flooding to the driveway and garage at 16046 SE l 42"d Place. Alternatively, the owner of the property could explore the possibility of retrofitting the outlet of the drainpipe from his property with a flap gate or extending the outlet of the pipe an additional 80 to 100 feet downstream to where the flood water surface in the channel is below the upstream invert of the pipe. Impacts of Mitigations on Downstream Properties I do not believe that upsizing the conveyance pipes along 160th Avenue SE would aggravate flooding that occurs further downstream. The amount of runoff that flows out of the constricted ditch during floods along 160th Avenue SE is enough to cause damage to affected properties. However, containing this water in the conveyance system would likely not result in a substantial increase in flow rate .. Furthermore, because the storage volume in the roadside ditch is relatively small and provides insignificant attenuation, upsizing the pipes as proposed would not result in an increased flow rate at the downstream end of the improvements. If you have questions regarding these analyses or need additional documentation, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, Edward McCarthy, Ph.D. P.E. Hydrologist . i Mr. Mike Romano December 5, 2002 Page6 References Haozous Engineering, August 26, 2002. Evendell Plat -Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis. Renton, Wash. Haozous Engineering, June 15, 2001. Evendell Plat-Preliminary Technical Information Report. Renton, Wash. King County Department of Natural Resources, 1998. King County Surface Water Design Manual. Seattle. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON CLAIM FOR DAMAGES (LAIM 21860 NOTICE: No damages. can be·pald by King coun~f unless a claim complying ,,ith Washington State Law's presented to the King County Council. Mer filing claim, please direct all. questions to the Office ot Ris~ Management at, (205) 296·7432. INSTRUCTIONS: 1}Cornp\ete form 1 giving specific detliils about your damagB' or loss. 1riclude dates: tfm~s end witnesses. Z)Sign and have the rorm notartzed. 3)Return form to King County Clerk of the. Councii, Roon, 403, King County Courthouse, Seattle, WA 98104 . . NAME /Jllcn-,Ytfl'fl( . 111. &el\/d (?IV 1 .f~. (~lrst, middle, last or business name) _ ADDRESS /~-,Z/ /(tzf ,fa/. S f:. -l:4./o-J?td ?rf a5 f> (home or b!_:siness} Include city, &ta.re and tip . PHONE\_dGC, J.77-rfl'o{ ( I BUSINErS ) HOME r,,, 1\ . PHONE:vxc·~J.l 77-J'l 2/ MESSAGE PHONE: ______ _ I ADDRESS SIX MONTHS BEFORE LOSS/ACCIDENT ii · /.:. :ocCURRED: / ~ z..j ~ l{o s: r: -u:4-v (_ · /nclucl• cllY, .&tile and zlp loATE or Acc1DENT l.b..r, C TIME oF ACCIDENr8-/0 / "1-A~OuNT cLAtt,~;;:f 5:[,£~~ kocATION LOSS/ACCIDENT l'i'.O 1.rf /bl) J:c ' ~-</ z1,.J . I \ DESCRIPTION OF DETAILS (Describe how ihe loss/incident occurred): . Su d<C•cl'.-,,#r tJ . . I [ __ _ /PROPERTY DAMAGE (Please describe the value and extent or damage to your home, automobile, o,· ·--_-·, 1persona! pro rty. Attach estimates, bills oiwt'1atever documentation or damages rou ;nay · ihave): . . ----·-- 1 .[.y "'::ti!'"''kf e .-~.'=~v,fl 66 • ··rn~:· 1:m•,,e !MJURY {lf y~u ·.vrJrf: inj•.!red, pleas:.e d;_crihs in full}:_.,A,.l)..,,n·.o&,cc-.-ok}:/.~r:</?Cr :!'r I ldentl/y phy~ician(s) or any other medical professional(•) involved: _ _.N"'-<tui/<i-:.·--------~- ! ~~ear mis ts a true and attur~~~ tfat~n~ent PROPERTY DAMAGE 35.00 Hair dryer 95:00 vacuum cleaner 950.00 Carpel and pad 150.00 Removal 600.00 Doll House ~0.00 Dog bed 225.00 1wo N intendos 100.00 Stereo cabinel 800.00 Hidcabed 7 50.00 Couch .,50.00 Recliner 250.00 Sicrco speakers 200.0il coffee tahlc 17 5.00 Pictme frnmes IS5.00 Wicker chair ·150.00 three <loc>r> at 150.00 each 100.00 Rug cleaner-rental 50.00 Rug Ian rcnlal -5 days S5,505.(J0'Total Cos IS Brenden claim Atlachment C · January 18, 1997 •The torn! nmount does not include hidden charges such as mildew or water·damagcs to the walls Or irlsulation. King Cour1l)· Involvement Brenden claim AnachmentB January 18, 1997 King Co,mty Maintenance over a period of three months have be.en cleaning, lining and otherwise improvinfthc drainage ditches on both sides of 160 SE above my property starting at a point from SE I 30th street. 111ese improvements and cleaning was extended to approximately l block North of my pnipcrty. This action cau~cd the drainage water to be all diverted to the culVtrt at my property site rather 1hnn some waters be absorbed by properties above mine. lmmcdifllcly North of my site the County andlor others diverted all waters draining on the West side of 160 SE by the use t~f a culvert under the roadway to the Ea.'>l side of 160 SH thereby doubling the water volume immedintely 11bove my hornc Sile. This action along with ditch improvements-to the North and the:debris huiidup in the ditch next to my home caused an overflow of the culvert area.and directly caused my.house 10 be deluged with drainage wntcr. I believe the County erred in·improving the drainage areas above my site rather than below my site. rhis lefi only iny house to contain the excess flow nfwatcr. I have included photographs to help you helter understand the County's negligence in this matter. Photo No. I Driveway at 138 l 5 160 SF.·~hows drnin culvert and \•olume of water on \VEST side· of 160 SC Photo No. 2 Drrduagc ..ind culvcn \VF.ST side of 160 SE Pho(o No. 3 Drainage of water in ditch on WEST side of 160 SE and the point where this drainage is directly closed off and ro111cd to the EAST side of 160 SE and direct!)' feeds this water through my culvert. Photo No. ,1 Drainage on EAST side of i 60 SE ,md immediately prior to conversion of waters see Photo. No. 3 Pho10 No. 5 Drainage ditch on EAST side where waters from both EAST ond WEST ditches were diverted by·the Counly directly above my residence. Photo No. 6 Drain cuivort from WEST diich to EAST ditch. Photo No. 7 EAST di1ch directly Norlh of my residence and after the conversion ofbo\h WEST and EAST drainage ditches into one drainage ditch. Photo No. 8 West side ()f 160 SE ( across the street from my home). Although there is a culvert on the South tlie culvert ends or is plugged before it meets 1hc drain waters on the WEST side of 160 SE. J:j' .:.: .. · " ·,1.:.J::::.· .,.. . ·.11': \' I ' i ' ! •·1 • .. ·.·;,·t· . , ... ~ __ ;. · ..... ,:, . ., I I j 1 :• •! -:,.)\: I ,.,,·.<·' ·i':' i",.-;i·_· f.:di:~·. / ., rf J}~·· ~Jf.i\: ··r-:;1··. )t;· ,"''' t}~f) ~)·~,::· 13renden claim Attnchme1it A January: 18, 1997 Description of details: (see attachment A) Loss resulted from npproximatcly a foot or so of water entering !he ground floor area of my'home at 14028 160 Avenue SE and severely damaging or destroying 1he contents ofth~ living area ofmy home. The water was the result of an overflow from lhe roadside ditches arld its drainage culvert on 160 SE c3used by J. uvcrgrowth of vegetation 2. dct,ris in the ditch immediately adjacent lo my home and 3. excessive waler drainage routed to the ditch adjacent to my home. hy the County. :•, . . .·\,,: ·.' •:',•!, ·.1: I .• Oct 30 02 02: 1Sp Habitat Technolo~ies 2538411942 p. 1 ' .,,, COPY ~Si c4S',~ October 28, 2002 Centurion De11elopment Services 22617 -8th Drive SE LO 1 PO O 16 Bothell, Washington 98021 oc ~o i37 L,qtv, lf11v1:, . . 20oz 'Dus. Luutv RE: ADOENDUM to .the Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report, Wildlife £ St1r([ Habitat EvakJation, and Conceptual VVet!and Mitigation Plan for the Evendell £s Project Site Dear Mr. Romano, if Subsequent to the preparation of the • Wetland Evaluetion and ~n Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation. and Conceptual Wetland Mitigation Platt' for the Evendall Project Site, (Habitat Technologies, May 2001) the Selected Action Plan has been modified. This addendum describes the changes from the original report. The Evendell Project Site is approximaiely 14 acres in total size and is located eest of the City of Renton, King County, Washington. Onsite assessment of the project site following the procedures outlined in the Washington state INetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Wash. Manual) and the Corps of Engineers llllet1ands Delinealian Manual (1987 Manual) resulfllld in the identification of one area (Wetland A) that md"libmld hydric soils, waland hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation consistent with the established criteria of both the Wash. and 1987 Manuals. . The preliminary Selected Action Plan of the Evenelell project site included the creation of independent lots suitable for the de..elopment of single-family homesites consistent with the King County Compiehensive Plan. Bulfer averaging was to b8 used along the western boundary of the onsite ~land as a part of this lot creation. The Selected Action Plan of the Evendell project site focitses on the creation of independal,t lots suitable for the development of single-family homesites consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan (Attachment 1 - Preliminary Plat). An essential element of this process is the development of access roadways and utility corridors that meet both King County health and safety standards and the goal of avoidance and minimization of potential short- term or long-term adverse impacts to aquatic environments. wetllE mis, s~ ~' wiF :Clfa -Mi8"a tfon mKi p,euc · Cl t vat th: 1s P .o. i!oJl 109S, ~valt..p, llllrns I • , 1,1-98371 vcoco 253 8195-5119 ~ Report ~=U~ Oct 30 02 02: ! Sp Habitat Technolocies 2538411942 l A primmy tearure in the creetion of these homesite lots wiU be the establishmel it of a protective bUffer adjacent to the idal ltified onsite watlend consistent with King County Sensitive Area codes. The creation of these hOITl89ite lots will not require placement of fill within identified wetland areas or rBdudion of the stanmrd buffer width as previously proposed. Site d:evelopment requires construction of road improvements within existing unopanad SE 136th Street right-of-way along the no,H.em projact boundary. This will require the unavoidable fiUing of th9 northern 200 square feet of Wetland A and redl.lction of the associateci buffer by 4,649 square feel In addition, in response to King County staff concerns, the applicant has proposed constructing ro2d frontag9 improvements along 1sdh Avenue SE consisting of a paved shoulder and relocation of the drainaga ditch. This will requre the unavoidable intrusion into 2,340 square feet of the buffer for Wetland A. As mitigation for the unavoidable loss of wetland and buffer associated with required road improvmnents, the wetland_buffer will be increased by the addition of 15,495 square feet of forested_area located in the northeast comsr of the site betureen .the csstem boundary of the watland and 160th Ave. SE. Provision of this addilio,,al buffer fully compensates for the unavoidable intrusions into the weHand and standard buffer areas and will not adversely impact the remaining wstland area. El IBIB1 i S OF THE IWFfEft ADDmOM AND WETlAMD RESTORATION Pl.A!\! 1. The buffers associated with the identified onsite wetland will be established to the King County standard 50-foot width. Identified onsite wetland and associated buffers will om be advel'sely impacted by full.Ire onsile land uses. 2. As a part of the development of the required roadway impro1191"11S' ,ts the actual encroachment into buffer area of Wetland A will be held to the minimum necessary to meat County roadway requiremsnts. Following placemsnt of the roadway improvements the ~Y side sklp8s within the buffer areas will be rewgatated by seeding with an approprize SS8d mixture. 3. As compensation for unsvoidable encroachment into the north end of Well&nd A, 400 square feet (a 2 to 1 ratio) of cl8graded '#8tland in the proximity of the edge of the rosdbed will be enhanced through the planting of native treas and shrubs. This restoration will enhance wetland function by providing structural diversity in the plant community. 4. As compensation for un8'roidsble encroachme11t into the north end of the buffer associated with Wetland A and a portion of Iha buffer on the east side of Watland A the standard buffer will b8 inae sad to encompass the entire northeast comer of the property. This buffer width increase will enhance EvendeU-2 00062 Wdlsn<Widdlife Raport ADDENDUM p.2 I Oc~ 30 02 02:19p 2538411942 ·- 'llldand function relative to that provided by sta, idaid buffers through il'lQ ea led visual and auditory bfockege from 16d" Ave. SE and g. ler conservation of wildtife habdat opf)Ol'iunities. 5. In order to protect the watiand and associated buffer erosion control Best Management Practices will be implemsnted during all phales of construction. These measures include silt fencing along the buffer prior to any onsite actions. In addition, all e,cpond areas will be seacled with low giowing grasses upon the completion of onsite actions. 8. All activities related to the establishment of the buffer areas will be monitored by the project biologist. WETLAND RESTORATIOfll NlD BUFFER ENURGCFFENT PLAN :) The GOAL of the identified buffer addition plan is to ensure that proposed site development actions (i.e. the upg.ading of an existing right-of-way ro&Ql#ay to meet King County health and safety standaids) do not create a short-term or long-t8fffl adverse impact to the onsite watlands or associalecl buffer areas. Th8 total amount of King County jurisdictional w lland area to be unavoidably modified by this project eq1181s :lllMI ~ fuGt. As compensation for this unavoidable impact to Welland A, 4GO e1; ·mo feat (a 2:1 ratio) of remaining degraded wetland will be restaed through the planting of native treas and shrubs. The total amount of King County jurisdictional buffer area to be unavoidably modified by this project eqi 181s 6,986 squaae feet. As compensation for this unavoidable impact to Wetland A, 15,416 & ; nre feet (a 2.2:1 ratio) of area at the r Kll 11 :eastern comer of the project will be dedicated to buffer area. The purpaeo of the l,\ietlaoo Restoration Plan is two fold. a=wt, to define the wetland restu.ation plan proposed as an element of the construction of the Evendell deY&!opment. S11 cond, to identify the objectives and c:rtteria whereby the St iccess of the completed wetland and buffer restoration plan will bed lam,ined. E-1-3 00062 Vidl:uul//Aldl:le RGpOlt AODENOUM p.3 oci 30 02 02,2op Habitat Tecnnologies 2538411942 .• ' • • To achi8ve the identified GOAL, the following OBJECTIVES are defined: A. The restol 8d wetland will exhibit scrub/shrub and sapling vegetation classes within three years following initial planting. o N;teral B;m a rirrf /t4LH ntee IB. The restored wetland will utilize native trees and shrubs which provide additional habitats for wildlife. This wetland area will provide nesting and cover habitat for l)866eline birds common to the area within three years. PBS ORSIANC'I: CRITERIA To establish whether the defined project OBJECTIVES have bean met by the watland restoration plan, the following PEAFORlilANCE Qcll I iUUA have been esiablished to apply to the restored wetland area. otj G@lve A. The resttlled wetlantt will exnibit scrub/shrub and sapling vegetation classes within three ye,ars following initial planting. Pe.fomlance Crileria; As dsfil't8d by specific plant counts 100% of the tress and shrubs initially planted will be alive at the end of the first growing season. Pariannanc:e· Criteria; As defined by specific plant counts 80% of the trees and shrubs initialy planted (cumulative count) will be alive at the end of the third grCJl#ing season. Otj c!iw. B. The restoled waUand will utilize native treas and shrubs which provide additional habitats for wildlife. This area will provide nesting and cover habitat for passerine birds common to the area within three years. Paifo.n@IIC@ Crimria: Use by passefine birds will be documented through observations and photographs of individual birds and direct habitat utilization. Sela c tad Plant Conununiti as The plant species selected for planting in the wetland and buffer areas will be obtain8d as nursery stock. 1he specific regional nursery will vary according to plant species and nursery aWlilatiity. The selected species are native and Evendell • 4 00062 W-odMli!dlite Report AOOENOUM p.4 • Oct 30 02 02:20p HabitPt Technologies • commonly occur in the local area. The plant species pr8llaibsd were selected to increase plant diversity, match p1 esent onsite communities, and ina a a&e wildlife haMats The plant locations will be nine feet on center for the trees and six feet on center for shrubs and will be adjusted in the field at Iha time of planting to ensure plant survival and to protect retained nam,e species. QUMTrr Cal ¥1:W NMIE PROPOSED INDICATOR y SCISfflFIC ll:IMCE SIZE STATUS 4 Westem rad cedar (THP) 6-81! FAC Thuia . 6 We lama~(PYF) 4-61! FACW Pyrus fu:sca 8 Pacific ninebark (f'!"IC} 2gal FAr::N- 8 Red osier dogwood (COS) 2gal FACN- Comus stoiomflera 8 Sitka willow {SAS) 2gal FACW Salix silchensis l\llaintenance of the restored wetland and bufrer plant communities may be required to assure the long-tfll'1Tl health and welfl'II e of the wetlands environmental functions. HoweYer, this area is so small as to make maintenance and mooitoring unwarranted. In lieu of maintenance and monitoring, the 400 square foot area will be planted at dol Ible the nonnal planting density for trees and shrubs. This will provide for mortality of the planted vegemtion while still meeting planting density objectives. Temporary irrigation will be established within the restored wetland area to ensure one-inch of water from June through September of the first year following installation of the plantings. Financial guarantee will be defined using the standard King County Sensitive Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet. King County will hold these guarantees_, Should you have questions or comments regarding this addendum, please CCI ltacl: ma. Mark Heckert Senior Walland Ecologist E-1-5 00062 WdandNllildllle Report ADDENDUM p.S Nlichael ROfflilllio From: Sent: To: Cc: SU!zject: Mike, \ ) Ed McCarthy [edwan:lmccarthy@msn.com] Tuesday, October 29, 2002 5:40 PM LO 1 PO O 16 Michael Romano Robert Darrow Evendell -Downstream Flooding along 16oth Ave SE I've reviewed the flood damage claims for the property at know, the claims were recently released to us by ODES. As we suspected, based on the Level 3 Analysis we conducted for the downstream system this past August, this flooding problem is considered 11 severe" by the King County Surface Water Design Manual. At this location, both 160th Ave SE and a residential structure are subject to flooding. Our modeling predicted flooding occurs at the culvert in front of this residence at a 2-year return period. The predicted 100-year peak flow rate is 31.6 cfs. You and I have discussed alternative mitigations for the Evendell plat in recognition of this flooding problem. We've looked at the option of applying Level 3 detention standards Onsite (versus the required Level 2 detention -standards) and also discussed providing upgrades to the downstream conveyance system as an alternative. Until these claims were released, we did not know the exact nature of the flooding. Based on the information we now have in hand, I would recommend upgrading the downstream system as oPposed to adopting onsite Level 3 detention standards. In my opinion, in this situation, upgrading the conveyance system along 160th Ave SE by eliminating constrictions, will provide more benefit to the neighborhood and downstream system than wo_uld adopting a more stringent detention standard. While either mitigation would conform to requirements in the Surface Water Design Manual, only the conveyance upgrades would fix the existing problem. Based on my rough calculations, the existing 18-inch diameter pipe at 14028 160th Ave SE would need to be upsized to a 24 or 30-inch pipe. We will have to perform more detailed calculations to determine the pipe size. As described in our Level 3 Analysis, oth~r conveyance improvements would be required including replacing two driveway culverts on the west side of 160th Ave SE, the cross culvert, and an additional culvert irrunediately upstream of the pipe at 14028 160th Ave SE. If you·have questions or need additional analysis, please call me. Ed McCarthy, Ph.D., P.E. , ,-) ~:· ~\., ·-. •• •• °' • ~ • •-"• ,_, '.,;• ·--~---·.'.·-··" ___ ·,:·_'_:~;_'..?'~-:~:.'.~.: .. _. ___ N•-• , •• : • · ·".:~ft).\/.. . --. ; -: -.. :.,~:\ ~\ :~\-Ar.i~/.i::?r-1_/~~i,~<j~~tf,.: >:-:·::-~,.-./ . · ;/(,.::: .. 'iiloc ool.4 ~-eso &lboU. ·bow Cito.~ tf!.i:lacJllg prior Wd.cut:la ':ofl ··Glll7 oulc·or ll'&aHL!dills OC 1'1!10 of§'._@cao,lllSS7,ilo 11Qo:;)00Bgyo ~ : osacer upoa ool.4 piropny fa&' Clw gRIBpot,JQ oil caaocncc:1.DG. INIPlllirille• ·.:'.aJ.CllrislQo Oil' -GaOCSIZftUIII Hid ldoCff fE/t BafM&' ffm:I.Do Cl&" pglrfng Dfl9 , ca cci.oao ~Cito vt.dlou1: ~ ll&ll7 S.pl o1,1!8')Cia Oil' 110° :b!\Ucy dlsrefa&'8 ~ CllaC Duell CClll&laacnago INIPsl.&':1.DGo alCO&'bQ :ar ncoaoCl'UCC:I.DG oll -oaid !:face&-osr S4lw&' Hal.Ill &ball bo a uapUlllwd lllil GlliCls o -· Ciloc die p;rivaco i· J&o. •CB l!llSi.GUAB :I.D cb!o · ripc--oll-vay DIMlU. IIOC be di.scuned w desa:o, .. do c :I.II ell© oveac dlay mro df.ecurllod or d4llllC&'O,udo =v tlf.U bil SIDPl.acsd :I.D /JO good o cadi.cf.OII oo Clls>Y t<Oftl l.illil!Nl.acoly llsfllftl dtl> r,,:ogoa:cy tfoo oacorod a,-by ~ Oire111coo. _ .. :,;·: ~ . 'iito oroacor o!ll>U rGJl:0:1.D dlO rlebc· ~ :~ . dis ourfoco of oald '~ 0011Gm311Co oo 1G:il8 OD IMlld 11110 dCl30 iZOC i.llClilrian tfi.da dis t.aoca11o 0 r-Ci.Gil ad cdaCGIIQJl:O of Ciao llocsr oad Setlilr Mat.a oad oo lOll8 oo ao ~ac buUdt.ago w auu:curoo ors oncad a oald oaOOfllSIICo . • . ,.. •· "·.•-;·:c,!:~~:f;·!•-.·:'.;:.·; ·. ) .. •• • 'ibi.o ooDGmOa,:: obaU bo o c0Vl!ltl0111: naalaa meta die llllld oad oboll bo bladf.lla oa tao oucceooorDo ltof.a:Do ad ODDI.po of bom _..,-.~. 7;:e g ~ ~ 1,--/,'' ~ /+:::::::e:z < IT ( 1: !L,!.4.A,.4 ,,........_':z ·. :., . l i' ' I l ".1 ~-_.o ., ' DATEO thls ~ d/ day ot_-'ri--'e_d_;F._,,_A-fP __ ,+-f------------~ 10 ?S-: GRANTOR: DAVID A. NYBLOM, ·~""-Debra Abiso ev: fln,n:OQ Y?~:w- ev, a q On-, a. O&-,.o; STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KI IJCr l l ss l On thiS day pGf'IOnally appenred before me DAVID A. NYBLOM, to ma known to be the indlvidual(a) dncr1bed tn and who oxocutocl the Within and foregoing IMtrument. and ocknOwtodgod UtDt ho algnod tho came DG his free and ~~hand doecl tor the uses and purposes thttntln menUomrd. _.. ,11. ~AAl·u,, A :~~ .. !~~~(.~~°'Jdafflclalsealthls 1,:a,L dayot J/$1(.uAo/ 19 9)- f "j<:'.:-.. i·l\,~~~···~ '\ f?~ ~ '._:. .: ~:~~ -···-;: J ·, j Print~= C1A ,:-: ... -.. , .. t!R'Jv ] ~:: ':, ·>.'.:· . • . .. . ::~---~<::5.:: • •. • . """" 'ii:-<.::, -- '·,, OF WAS~"----: \ \ ,,-,,,, ......... - STATE OF WASHINGTON ) Notary Publlc In and for lhe Slato of Wmahlngton Rosldlno •• J,. 1:l' Ir U, f &;, My commission oxpirn '3 -fd -(o :..- l ss COUNTYOF KIIJ<r-l 'f>l"<l'I:> Mr<'1..o..--0 On this day penon111ly appeared before ma O E:dR A A.L d f So to mo known lo be lho lndivtdualCs) do&Ctibad In and wha u:aculed tha within and foregotng ln•trumont. and acknOWladged lhal S:Y:E signed the aame n hS:f free and voluntary act and deed far Uta UIOS and purposes therein memioned. Natary Public In end far the Stale of Watttlngton Rnldlng at J?,.,,J" (r ( J :. ~· My commissMJn expires J "/..J:'i \ ·-.t §,J&tlmlll L. 4J :: iii· ,. \ ; ' J I : ' I I ' : i I "!',,t . . ::"·-~~ 'I' ,. ; . ~:'. ·.; • ~' -· ) , ,.•: 0 -· 9501465 JH-ACOOl 235-56 ' EXHIBIT "A" THE £AST Hl\.t.F OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OP THZ SOUTHEAS'r QUARTER or SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 rlORTII, MNGE 5 &AST, WILLI\METTE Kl!:RIDIAN, IH KIHC: courrrr. WASHI1IGTOU1 EXCEPT TllAT PORTION OF SAID EAST HALF or THE IIORTHWEST QUARTER OF TU£ SOUTHEI\ST QUMTER OF SAID SECTION 14 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS s DEGIHN"INC AT TH.&: SOUTHBI\ST CORNER OF SAID EJ\ST KJ\LP or THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF Tlllt SOUTHEAST QUARTER I\S THE POINT OP TllUE BEC"IHNIN01 TIIEHCB NOR'TII 25•21• EJ\ST 523.99 FEET ALONG TUE EMT LIN£ OF SAID EAST ll~F OF THE IIORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTllEAST QUM'l'ERI THENCE HOR'l'H as•o1.•se• WEST 653.61 FEET TO Tit£ WEST LIN£ OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE HORTtlWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARfl:R1 THENCE SOUTH 0•27•05• WEST 525.82 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE or SAID EAST 11/\LF OP THE HORTHWEST QUARTER OF TUB SOUTHEAST QUARTERI THENCE SOUTH es•11•35• EJ\ST 653.84 FEE'T I\LONO Til8 SOUTH LIN£ OF SAID &AST HALF OF TUE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO TIIE TRUE POIHT OF DEG"INHIHG: I\ND EXCEPT COUNTY ROADS. : . 114¥1-J .. @ ,, I I I ! \ I ; ' l l ' I i I i , .\ J ,j 4 .. , •J ,I 'l l , J ' J t J l ii 1 I ,. __ ,.____ __ 0 0 SO 100 ,,, j wl 200 #&·l 1 • 1:1 100' Ro,tz.. ,SI$ aF -(l<CAS) rra 1 DOl:.'l '°. cith ;t at 111'95. • -c,;:::, ,::::=::I 11), c:, IHI EAST H~ aF N -'IMtCT QUAIIIUI OF ll<t SOU-QUAIITER OF 5EC110>t 14. TO USIC:,, :U -1H, RANG![ S WT, VIU.AM(Tlt lltRll)IAH. IN 111HO COUNTY, tlAS!~ DCiJ'T 1HA T PQR'IIO>t '• SAIII EAST HAU" 01 THE NOAlHYCT CUAIITDI (1T IH£ SOll'll<IAST CUAll11R Cfl' SAID SECllOII 14 Gal"D\910 AS RlUDIIS: 11:tGllS<"II AT THi[ SCUMAST COIIIG a, SA111 WT ~ aF THE -11111:iST QUAIIIP 01 l!C SOU'IICAST QUM1UI AS 1IGt POINT 01 1RUE ·-·C; 1HDlClt NQll1M 00'25'21° WT SZ199 PtET M.DNG 'IHI!: It.AST UNI a, SA10 ltAST HAI.I aF 1!11E NOll1HaaT CUAR1111 01 1Mit SCU1IIIAST C1UAA111t THINCfl IIOA1M W07'V' 1111131' -81 PtET TO 11ft llEST LIi¢ aF SAID EAST HAIi aF lllt NCIRllftliST-01 lHI SOUIHIEAST CUAllllll: 111D1CE SOU1H OO'ZTOll0 111ST !l2S.8t FIET 10 1Ht SOUTH Ula 01 SAID EAST HAIi aF '!IE -..sT CIUAlfflll aF 1Mit SOU'IICAST GUAR1ER: -SOU111 118'17'3ll" EAST 8511.84 ,u;r M.DNG 1Ht SOUTH UC 01 SHD l!AST 1'"11 01 11C 1111111,4t!i.51 CUAlfflR 01 THZ SCU1ICE4ST CUAlll!R 10 THI .'IIIUt PQIIT rtl Bitcli UellQ. --C:CU:OTY ROADS. 1) 1IGS SURVZY 11lllS 8ASEII OIi A CClil1IIOI. lRAVERSE USING A ,,_ CltS-3C lOTAL STAllOII N!IJ El!IZIDS 1HIE-ST""1WIDS PEQIIIR£0 BY l'IAC 322-1- 2) M I.QCA110H 01 M 160TH AVE. SL (A.IC.A. HAaY El. IQl.SOH AOAD) tlAS D£1'EJllladO FRoi, ICING COUHTY RQAO SUR\£'I' NO. 14235-1 VO.. 287 1/2. 3) R!RlmlCE mu: R£PCltT BY OllCAGO mu: INSURANCE CO.. NO. 211lffll. EFnClM: AUGUST 13,, 11191, s !I 5 .. ;,::.:-.~ I @::m ... -. " o.r l'J't'j. 1Kl i CM.c.--_.......,. , (Ol-10-0I) -.-.. .... .,, .... ~.,_l~~~;;:;--41~,.~~'---~.; -.,_.-__ A»0 II CA!il!I taa.11• M Q. DISl a CASl ( __ , 11 N88°38'07'\ol 2617,72' 11 ., (01-,0-021 BASIS OF' BEARING Cl<CCS> .A ~!;!'!'!!: I Aicoilb &i WWWY I _,.., DA'IID Nffl.OSa . A ~oflDO~ pc.. ccc.c, IOO'M. w.o,: S11493,F'8 ;!§ " 4$1 U10 lOf.1" AWIICUI .c2. ~. '#A .:GOA rn. ,,_ HO-aoro JJAa. t1001 HO-M70 mi& Flb& 1g1-as I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON II SHEET 1 Of' ---I .. ··"-!-- ., I i ~ :i,, i ... ') il .• -. ' . . -11 I -1-t;.. '< /2 .. / v~~-11"1:' ~ -/------·--:,\ '}-' .J . ··: -Y~ -4-·f::R_,d~~·;,. ··"a.--:./.•5-1.(! 7-,~/.-,_, .' , II ----.; ~. ~-J ,-· .. .\jf • (. • ~~~-· , ! ,~ ~·-" -· . , . ,; -~"" . I ·') !l Com Rec 415 Filed May 18/31 . V . : .,>'<_ , . , · , :?.DER OF ES-rABLISHMENT ROAD h"/ i.V ~<..";r::4 A.-.: /f-;:_3-,::;·-·.:_ ___ ,. r. ~[ HARRY B NELSON COUN'l.'l f .._,t_ ,.~ · ·• 1 Com at pnt 1268.82 ft W of cor comm to Secs ll,12,13>, :.; .• ·\ ,1:· \ and 14-23-5, being pnt on County Road No 434, rung th. S ·':'~---, a dist 2624.20 ft, th s 0°04'45" E a dist 2038.60 ft and ·· ending at pnt 1308.15 ft W of cor comm to Secs 13,14,23 _....~-i', and 24-23-5 being pnt on County Road No 135 . ~-~ ) \, 60 rt ... 1.n w1 1 _dth excl of.~lop-:_s for cuts and.f1.Lls/,,-· · -: ,i.; _1-t :-·:·--,_.( c:t_,:{r.t .Ct., )~, _7 (iAziv-'.1 .. ·,--.:·-: .. (ii~ -;\l . ·-.. __ ,.. ~ ...!. ' ' . . ' . • • ,., . I I -.;:-(...-.r· I' ... :;-_· ~ . a. ;f ..( -/ -, .; -~. ~~-;_:: .. ~1-,: .. J I • , Ht: COOIICII aT 1"'Z NW ~AR'IIII a, 1IC ~vr-.J@~•o1.'?.!l:Sl""--...::ir-----;;;;-;,:-..::...._-.;:;-;:;;:-------,...,b:.J.¥1\1..sit_..) S87'!18'1 l"'t S[ OUAAltR 01 S(C. 14 023.23' S[T llt8AR / ·i • 475.7' FIIO!.! S1'1PIIOS'. COll. -IS o:, Ula 274.2 ,_ S1'1PIIOS'. C(R. --It" 1.4' 71.J' FllOII sr,d:.°". FtNa: IS OH UNE S[T ROAR -LS CN' C 0 21140S SIC ~ .. ~ ,I" i z F'OUNO -AIID LS CAP L,TCIIA 9G34 EAST o, I.Im AND ll3Z.S NGITH W 'ME srt Pl10!'.·ca:1. (01-17-92) FOUICD RGAR '«!lit NO Cl# o.:r EAST OT Ula AND 40G.2' NCIIITH C1F 1H£ S.t. ""°"· COR. (01-17-92) I I 8AAII I ENCRQACl<tSI BY ,.o rar: RIECORDeR'& Clll!RTIFICA TII!! ,COROIHG HO.-------------led '"' roco,d llim_day ol ______ ,9 - :_I.I.In Bo=_ol at paqo_ l \ho ,_.,,t ol DO~ En9inocro. Inc. -. . . "----- ANO LS CN> JO.OI' 02844ll 1JO' ~ I ' ti "' ~ ! I 100 0 ~+..a ,• D 10 llASISaFB! ..,_- 8URVl!!VOlll'li!l Cll!IRt'Tifii'ICA. Ta lhlo map c:otTOCtly "'P'a,outo • .,,,.,,., -by 001":l. E,,4Jin~ Inc. \11\ck::t' my dlrocUon in ew.CO.se::ctea oitl'l U'lo ntciMircmatto of tho Sut'w)Ot'D Rd :A1 Act at tho rec,.,oot of Q,1,\AO N"tBl()M in .lA.T 194...!...! 7/eat,s .,.'.· '·· H t AnER RECORDING HAIL T01 PIRS1."' SAVINGS BMK or WASHINGTON ~3555 SZ 36th ST, Sta. 255 Bellevue, WA 980D6-148S ORDZR NUKDBRr 432598 7 744958 17 ----------------ISponAa-o"nblJDoFuRoc'OnllD4DdDJ---------------- DEED OIF TRUST THIS DEED OFTRU5r ("Security lmlnlmclll") is made oo JULY 21, 1995 Tbo gnmtor is DAVID A. HYBI,OM AND DBBIIA t... ALBtSO HUSBAND AHD WJ:n NORTHWBST FINANCIAL CORPORATION, & WASHINGTON CORPORATION PIRST SAVINGS BJUrlK OP WASHINa1'0N reol'TOWCr-). Tho trmtcc is ("Tru.stcc•). The bcacficiary is . whic:b is ol'plli:zed GIid czisti.ag under the Jaws of THB STATB or WASHINGTON • and whose Address ii P.O. SOX 907 WALLA WJU.LA, WASHINGTON 99362 (91.cadcr-). B0ff0Wer owes Lender the principal sum or TWO HU!ll>RBD TIIRBB THOUSAND 0KB HUNDRBD rirrr AND N0/1DO Dollus (U.S.$ 203,150.00 ). This debt is evidenced by Borrower-a aote dated lhe &Gme date as this Security Jnstnaaelll ("'Nate'"), which pnMdca ror monthly paymcnu, with the Cull dcbc. if not paid earlier, due mad payable on PBBRUAR.Y 1, 2026 • ThisSccwitylnurumenlaccurcstoL.c.odcr. (a) thcrcpaymcnto(thcdebtcYidcaccd by tho Note, with lntcrcat,. mid all rcncwe.ls. cstemiom 1111d modillcaliom of the Note; (b) tbc paymcat of all other sums. wilb intcn:u. adwuu.:cd. Wider parasrapb 7 10 proeect tbc accurity of this Security lasbumcat; aad (e) the performance o! Bunuwcr's CCM:DDDts and agrccmeata under this Security Jnatnuncnt and the Note._ For l.b1a purpose.. Bonowcr irr'cYoc::tbJy grants aod COllV'l:)'S lo Trustcc. UI t.rust,. with power of aalc. lhc roUowing dcacnocd property located in JC.ING· County, Wubington: LECAL DESCRIPT'ION AT':'AalBD HBRBT'O AND HADE A PART HBRl:01'. which has the address of 13 606 Wasbingtoo 98059 (ZlpCodel 158TH AVBNUB SOUTHEAST , ...... , ("Property Addrcas"); RJINTON 1°'71 TOGe:ntER WJTH all the improvements now or hereafter ercded OD the property. and all casements. appwtcnaDCCS. a.ad r.nwcs now or hereafter a pan o( the property. AU rcplar.cmcnts and additioas shall al.so be covered by this Scauil)' Jnsuumcal. All or the Corcgoins is rcrcm:d to lD this Security lmtrumcat as the "Property.· BORROWER COVENANTS thal Bol'l'O'WCf is la~ully sciscd or tho cstale bcrcby conveyed and bas tho right lo grmn :ind convey tbc Property uad lbat the Propc~ is UDCAa&mbcred. except for encumbraaccs o( record. Borrowel' wanants and will defend generally the title to the Property ~ all claims ud dcmaa~ &ubjcd lo any cncumbrucca or record. THIS SECURJTY JNSTRUME?n' combines uniform CO\ICD&Qt.s for natiooal use tmd DOD6UDil'orm c:ovcnants with limited variation.."' by jurisdic:tlon lo COGStit.ulc a uaitorm scc:wity .imtrumcnt covcriAg real property. UNIFORM COVENANTS, Bonowcr and Lender covcnan& aDd agree a.,, follows: I. Pnymmt or l'riDc:JpD.I ood lateral; Pnpaymc.11t aad. Lote C'b.nrBQ. Borrower ab.all promptly pay when dua the principal of and iolcrest OD tbc debt evidenced by the Note and uy prcpaymco1 aod late cbargca due under the Note. WASHINGl'ON•Sin&lc Pemily-FNMA./nll.MC UNIFORM INSTRUMEfff FormJ61D 9/90 (pap l of SJ Doo #134 (04-91) fPSSM.1 \ i ' J ) I 1 l I \ I 'l J r I .•. .. , .•. '·' . -~----------- ~- t I 2. F1111da for Tmea aDd lmlurmace. Subjccl to appUc:nblc law or to a wriUcn waiver by LcDdcr, Bonowcr daaU pay to Lender oa tbc day moalhly paymcats ate due undu lhc Note, until the Noto is paid iD full. a sum (9Fuad&j for: (a) ycady lucs nnd .nsscaamcat.a which may attain priority over this Sccuritj.lmtrumcnt as a u~ on tbe Propcny; (b) yearly lcucbold pay,ncata or s,ound....,.. OD the Property, If any; (c) yearly bumd Dr propcny lnswaacc premium,; (d) yearly OODd Wllrallcc pn:miwm, il aar, (c) ~y mortgaac inswancc premiums,. if a.ny; aad (f) any awm payable by Borrower to Leader, in accordance with the proYisiom or paragntpb 8, in lieu of the payment or morqpgc imvancc prcmluma. These itGma arc called ·&crow ltcmL • Leader may, at DAY lime. collect and bold Funds iii a.a amouat DOt to cxcecd the. muimum amouat a lender for a fcdcrnlly related mOJ'ISl&'C loan may require for Borrower's cac:row accowat UDder the federal Real l!sla.tc Sculemcnt Pr<>ccdun:aAct of 1974 as a,ncadcd Crom time to time, 12 U.S.C. I 21iOI ••,.... ("Rl!SPA"), unless another lawthal applicata the Funds sets a lcucr amounL If so. Leader may, at any time, caUca aad bald Fuda in u amount not to cxcccd &he lcsac:r amou.aL Lender may catimllle llm amount or Funds due oa the basis of currcat data ud rcuorahlc Cllulla1cs of expcndkwcs of flltwa l!scrQw ltcma Dr otherwise iD acconluac:c with applicable law. Tbc PUDds ahall be beld iD DD im&ltUIIDD whoso deposits nrc insured by a federal DgCDC)', imtrwncatallty, or cotity ("mduding Lc:ndcr, ii' LcDclcr is suc:b an i.asututioo) or in any Federal Home LoaA Duk. Lender ala.all apply lbc Fuads to pay tbc Escrow Items. Leader may -cbargc Borrower for boJdiDa and opplP"IJ tho Fw,ds, DDOually oaalyzing tho =:row account, or vcrifylna: the Escrow llcma, unJcu Lcadu pays Borrower iDacn:st on the Fwull mid applicable law ponnita Leader to make •ucb o. chargo.. HGWeYCr, Lcodcr may n:quiro 8otrowc.r to pay a ooo-WIIC daatgc for 1111 illdcpcndcnt real CSUU:c ta rcpnrtlag ..nice wed by Leader ill ca•nedio~ wlU, Ibis IDDD, UDloa oppUcablo law provides odlcnriso. Ualcsa an agn:cmCDI ls made or applicable, law rcqui.rca intcreat 10 be paid. Leader shall Dot be rcquin:d to pay Borrower uy iaticn:st or carniap oa the PuQds. B-,. aad Lender may ogr,:c ill writiog, howcwr, thal imcrost ablill be paid oa the Funds. Leader sb.U g;.,, to llom>wcr, without charge, 1111 DDOual oocaunw,g of tho Funds, ahDwiDg cn:dlta and debils to tho Funds and Ibo purpooo rar which each debit to tho Funds ,.,.. made. 1bc Funds are pledged as additional socurily far all sums .se<UrCd by Ibis Security haslrument. IC the Funds held by l.oDdor Cl<COII tho amDUDta permitted 10 be held by applicable law, LoDcler alwf accDWll to BOffOWCT far tho .,...,.. Funds ill -with tho rcquircmcalS Df applicable law. If tho BIDDUDt or tho Fuads held by Lender many time b not suflicicm to pay I.be Escrow IICIDS wbcn due. Lender ma.y ao aotif'y Bonowcr in writing. and, in &Uch cue Bonovn::r shall pay to Lc.adcr the amount MCC&SafY to make up the deru:icncy. Borrower shail make up the deficiency in oo more I.ban twelve monthly payments, a1. Lenders aoJc disactioa. Upon payment in. full of all auma secured by tb1s Security lmtrumcot. Lender ahaJ.I promptly refund to Borrower any Fund.s bcld by Lender. II, under paragraph 2t.. Lender shall acquire or ac:U lbc Property, Lcndc:r, prior to the acquisitJao or sale or the Property, aha1I apply my Funds bc1d by Leader at tbc time of acquisilioa or sale as a credit apimt the ,ums sccurod by Ibis Security lastrumcaL 3. AppllcaUoa ar PDya,ellla. Ualoa applicoblo law provide& otherwise, aU paymoal& rccciYcd by Leader under paragraphs I DDd 2 ..i..11 bo applied: linl. to DD)' prcpaymcat charges duo under the NDlc; ac-.1, ID amoualS payable under parogropb 2; thitd, lo iDlcrcat due; fDwtb, ID priadpal due; and last, ID any lalG d&ugea due uadcr thD Noic. 4. a.a._, Uciii,.;· B""'°'""' aliaU pay aU 1-as&CSUllCIIIS, chmgos, liDca ud impasiUons atulbutablto ID tho Property which may DIWA priority over this Sccaril)' Iasuumca&. and tear.bold payments or grounds n:ats. if any. SarrOWCt' ahaU pay these obllgalloas lo the numner provided iD pat'Zlll'3pb 2, or if not paid in t.hal manner, Borrower ahaU pay lhcm on time directly lo the person owed paymcaL BOl'r'OWCr sbAll promptly fumish to Lcodcr all not.ices of amounts to be paid under this pangraph. IC Bonowe:r makes tbc:sc payments dlrcdly, Bon'OWCI' sball promptly furaisll to LcDdcr rcccipts cvidcacina lhc pa,-:a ... Borrower Rall promptly dlsc:bargc uy lien which bu priority over this Security Instrument unless Borrower: (a) agn:a 1D writing to the pa)'QICnt of I.he obligation ICCW'Cd by the lien in a mmm.cr acc:cptable to Leader; (b) contests in good faith lbc Uca by, or defends apla.st cnfol'CClllcDl of t.Jac Ucn in. legal proceedings wbich iA the 1..c:lldcr"s opinion operate to pf1M:IU. the ca!orccmcat of the lien; or (c) secure& from the bolder of lhe lica an agreement u.llsfnctory to Lcodcr aubordilUlting tbc Deo to this Security Jmtnuacut. U Leader dctcrmiacs tbnt any part of the Property i.s 1Ubjcct to a lica wbich may au.ai.11 priority over this Security Instrument. Leader may give Banowcr a notice identifying lhe llco. Borrower sball samfy lhc lien or IDkc one or mOR of tho adiom act forth aboYc, wilhm 10 days of the sivina of aotim. S. Hamnl or Prapst;y l.naUfflllce. Borrowtt abaU keep I.he improvcmcs:ua oow cxistiDg UC' bcrcaCtcr cn:ctcd oo the Property imurod agaiast loss by rirc. hazards included within the term "ex1coded «m:rage• ...II 1111y other .._,ds, lnc1udina f1uods or llooding., for which Leader rcquin:.a insurance. This UUW111la: shall be. malrstaincd iD. the aunoUata and for the periods lhal Leader rcquir.:s. The i.asurancc carrier prO\lidiag the insurance aball be cbDSCD by Bonowcr subjcd lO Lcadct"s approval which sball not bo unrcasoaably withheld. If Bonowor fails to maintain ..,..,... dcscn1>ccl abcM:, Lender moy, •• Lender-a opt.ion,, obtain c:overaac to protect Lender's rigbts in the Property la accardmacc with puagrapb 7. All insurance policies aadia, ~ aball be acceptable to Leader and ahaU iDdude a amadard mortsmie dausc. Lclldcr shall have the: rigbl to bold the poticica ud renewals-JC Leader requires. Bonvwcr shall promptly give to Lender all rcccipts of paid premiums mul renewal notices. Ia tbc event of loss., Bo~ shall give prompt ooticc lo the iaaunuu:c aarricr and Lender. IAndcr may make proof of loss if not mada promptly by 8onoWCI'. Uolcss Leader aad DOffO'NCJ' otbc:fWisc agree in wriliag.. iasunacc:: procccds shall be 11pplicd to restoration or repair or the Ptopcrty damaged. if lhc rcstorotioo or repair is c.cooom1c:Ally fcaslblc and Lcader"a security ls not Jc.ucacd. If the rcaton.tioa or rcpml' i.s not ccoaomically feasible or Leader's accwil)' would be lessened, the insurance proceeds shall be applied to lbc sums secured by lb.ls Security lnstrumcnt. whether or not then due,, with 11ny caccss paid lo Bonowcr. If Bol'l'OWCr nb.lndom lbc Property. or docs aot amwcr wit.hia 30 days a notice Crom Lender that Iha U1$1D11Dcc carrier bu offered to settle a dun. lbcn Leader may collcc:t the imwancc procccds.. Leader may u.~c the pmcccds to repair or rc.slote tbc Property or lD pay sUOI$ secured by this Security Jmuumcaa. wbctbcr or not thca due. The :JO.day period will hcgia when I.he notice is gi~n. Unless Lender and Borrower otherwise agree in wri1ing. any appliration or pn,cccds lo prindpal shall not c:xlcmi or poslpoac the due dale or the m.oolbly paym.cn&s rc(cncd to in paragraphs S a.ad 2 or cbaagc the amoual o1' lhc pnym.cms.. If under paragraph 21 lhc Property is acquired by Lender. Borro~s right lo aay iasurancc policies mid procccJs resulting from damage to the Property prior to the. acquisition shall pass to Leader lo the C2tcat of tbc sums sec:w"cd by this ScauitJ Jn.strumcnt immediately prior lo the acquisition. 6.. Oetupcuu:y, Praa: ,oLloo, Mala<euaec u.cl Protection or Ille Property; Bornwtnl LoaD AppUcadoa; 1.c:Dadtolds. llonowcr sbaU occupy, ..iabllsb DDd U>C tho Property as Borrnwor'a priDdpal n:sidCDCO wilbiD aixty dey:a after lbc OlU:CUliaD or this Security lostnuncnt and sball coatiauc to occupy the Property as Borrower's principal residence for al least one )"CAI' alter lhC date of occupecy, uo.Jcu Leader otbcrwisc agrcca in writing. which coa.vmt shall nol be umcuonably withheld, or uolc:ss "'"9dcnuatiog circumstmaa:s exist which arc bcyolld Bonowcr•s coqt.roJ. Borrower shall not dcatroy. dD.magc or impair tbc P.ropcrty, allow 1bc Property to dclcrioralc. or a,mmit WDStc on the Property. Bom,wcr &hall be ill dcf.11:ult ii uy for£cilurc 0oo 0135 (OMJ1) FPSM,o.a ' I actioo or proc:ccding. whelbcr civi.l or c:rimilw. is begun that in Lender's good (aith judgmclll could n:ault iD fodciturc of the Property or otbcrwiso ma.1erially impair the lien created by this Security lnstrumcat or Lcadu"1 aecuriry intcrcsL Borrower mpy cure such a default a.ad reimlnlc.. as provided in paragraph 1a.·..1,y cauaing tbc action or proceeding to be di:emisscd with a ruling that. ia 1.codc,'a good raith dctcrmia"1lon. precludes faneiture or the B0m1w,:r'a iat...,.. ia the Property or othu au1tcrial impairment of the lien created by this Scc:Wity lmU'Umcat or Lender's accwity b:atcre3L .8onowCf, ahall aim be in ddault it Borrower, during lhc loan npplic:alioo proccu. pw materially Calsc or i.a.accurntc inlonnntioa or atatcmcaLI to Leader (or railed to prCJYldc Leader witb BIIY material iarormolloo) ia CODDcctiOD with tbc !om, mdeaocd by the Note, lnduding. but DOt limited to. rcprcac11tatiom coaccnw:18 Bonowcr"a occ:upnacy or the Property m a principal residence. U this Security lmuwnCDt is oo a h:uehold, Borrower aball comply with oil the prooillom or the lcaac. ir 8-owu acquires rce title to the Property, tbo lcascllold aod tho rec tllle &ball Dot merge uolcu I.coder aa,cea to tbo mc,ger ia wriUog. 7, Platedlon of~ lllabta ID tbe Pl,Jpmy. Ir Borrow,:r raib to perform tbo..,...,.,.,.. aad qrccmcots contaia<d in this Security lnatrumeot. or tbcn: is a legal proccediog tbal may ugnilic,mtly affect I.coder's rigbta ia tho Property (auch as a proc -ding in bmaknaptcy, probate, for coadcamati'OD or forfcitW'C or lO ccforcc lawa or regulation&). then l.cadcr may do ud pay ror wbolcm:r is ncccsamy to protect tbe value or tbo Property aod Lcodcr'a righta ia the Property, I.coder'• actiooa may iocludc paying m,y auma acc:urcd by a licD which bu priority ffiU this Sc=ity laalrumcat, appcariog ia court, paying reasmuible auorDCJI' fees and catering OD the Property lo make repairs. Altbougb Lender may take adlon ua.dc.r this puagrapb 7. Leader doca not have lo do so. A"'f --clldJuncd by I.coder under Ibis puagnpb 7 aball bccomo addllloml debt or Borrower acc:ur<d by Ibis Sccarity lmtnamcnt. UaJcas Bonowcr and Lender agree to o&hcr tcrma or payment. tbcsc nmoWda ahal1 bear inlCl'Cll Ctom Iha dale or disburacmenl at the' Noto rato aad aball be payable, wltb iatcrcst, ·-aoticc from Leader lo Borrower rcquating pa)'IIICIIL 8. M-......_ Ir Leader required mortga,gc lmuraocc os u CODclllloo or making tho loao ICCURd by Ibis Security bulrumcna. Borrower ah.all pay the premium& required lo IIUWIWD the mortpgc lmunmcc ill effect. IC. Car amy reason. lhc mortgage UIIIUQDce coverage rcqaired by Leader lapses or ccasca to be iD efrccc. BOl"l'O'W'CT aball pa)' the premium& required 10 obtaiD am::rup 11uQJ1ontinlly cqllivalcot to tho mortgage immazacc pnmGualy in cfi'cct. at D C011111t-teatielty cquiwlcDt to the COIi to Do-or the morfBZl&e lmurucc prmously ia cll'cct, from an altcroa10 mortgage insurer apPl'D"'d by I.coder. 1£ 1ubsaon1inQy equlvalc:at mOl'tgD,IP:J UUUl'aacc a,vcngc: is not avnilablc. Borrower &ball pray to Lender coda month o 1um equal to ooc•twdftb of I.be yearly mortgage lmunmcc premium being paid by BorTOM:r wbca tbe lmlll'Ulcc coverage lapsed or ceased l? be in effect. Lender will accept. use and rctaia tbcsc paymcats as a Joss n:ame ia llcu of monpge iuuraDcc.. Lou l'CICn'C payments may ao longer be required. al tbc optioa of Leader, U' mortgage lnsW11Dcc cavcngc (m the amount and £or lhe period that Leader requires) prCJYldcd by an lmurca· approwd by I.ender again becomes availahl,, aod is obtained. ~ sbaD pay the premium.a required to mnintein mortgage insunmcc iD cfl'ca, OI' to provide D k,u raenic. until lhc requircmen1 Cor mOl'IIDF imurDacc CDda in accorda.ncc wilh any wriltca. agreement bctwa:n Bomrwcr and LcDclcr or npplicablo bw. 9.. laopedlon. 1.cadcr or its agent may IIIWle reasonable cntrica upoa and impccdou or the Property. Lcodcr &ball give Bonowcr notice at the iliac of or priOI' to an Imped ion specifying reuonable COUIC Car tbc inspection. 10. Coademnntlrm.. The pn,occ:ds of ,my awnrd or claim for dnmagc:s. dircd. or coa.scqucntial, ia coancctioa wit.b IID)' coadcmnetiOCJ or other taldag or any part oC tbc Property, or Cor CODWl)'UOCC in lic11 of condcmoation., ~ bcrcby assigned and aball bo paid to Leader. · · · 111 the CV'Clll oC a totnl UWng of the Propcrt)', Lbc proceeds ahnll be applied 10 I.ho sum.a accurcd by thia Security Jnstruninl, wbcthcr or aot then due. wilh aay excess paid lo Bonowcr. ID lbc cvcn.t o! a partial taking oC tbc Property ia which lhc Cair market value oC the Property immediately bcfora the taking i.s equal to or grcalcr I.ban tbe amount of tbc sums .s.ccu,cd by this Sccuritt Instrumcat immcdiatdy bcCorc tile l4Jdn& unlcu Bonowcr GDd 1.cndcr olhcrwiac agree in writiag. Lbc awm secured by this Sc.cwity lmtrumcnl shall be reduced by lbc amount of the proceeds mulliplicd by the followin.s !rac:tioa: (a) tho total amount or the swm accurcd immccliatcly before Iha Ulkiag, divided by (b) the £air market Ylliuc of the Property immediately bcrorc tbc la!:iag. NJ</ balaa<C &ball bo paid 10 e-. fA the ...,.,, or a panial takiug or Ibo Property in which tbc fair morflct valuo or tho Property immediately before tbc taking is lcsa tb8II tbc amouot or tho awns accu,cd immediately before the taking, unleaa BoffOWCr and Lender oLhcrwisc ag:rcc io wriliDg or uDlcu applicable law otherwise providca, tho proc=d& &ball be applied lo tbc auma lCCURd by Ibis Security 1-eat wbclbcr or Dot tho sums arc thca due. U lbc Property is amncloncd by BoffOWCf. or~ after notice by Lcaclcr to Borrower that lbc coa.dcmoor offers 10 111ake an award or acu1a a clnim far damages. Borrower Cails lo respond to Lender wilhia 30 daya alter the elate tho notice is giYcn. Lcudcr is authorized to coUcct and apply tbc proccccls. et i&s option, citbcr to rcs&01'8tion °"" repair of the Property or to tho sums secured by this Security Imuumcnt. wbcthcr or not. t.bcn due. Ualcu. Lender aad Borrower ot.bcrwisc agree: in writing. any appliCAtion of proceeds lo principal ahaU not c:x1cod or pos&poac. the due data oC tbc montbly payments rcCcncd to i.o. pangrapba 1 and 2 or dumgc tbe am.oUDI of 1ucb payments. 11. Boaac::a Noc Reli:ucd; Fort.cnrrmce By Leader Not D Waber. Exlcnsion of lbc time for payment ormodific:ationof amurtization of the sums sccurcd by tlm Security IIISUUmcnt gnmlcd by Lender to a.ny succcuor in interest of BOff'OWCI' &ball not operalc to release the liability of lhc original Borrower or Borrower's aucc:c:.s.son in iatcrcaL Lcn.dcr ab.all cot be required to commence proceeding, apiast any auc:a:s.sor i.o intcn:st or rcCusc 10 exlcad time Cor payment or othc:rwisc modif¥,. amortization of tbc sums ICCurcd by this Sccur'lly lns&rwnent by l'CalOo of any dcmamd made by the origbud B01TOwcr or llorrowcr"s sueccu,ors in intcrcsL AIJ.y !orbcaraacc by Lender in cm:rcisi.ag any right or remedy shall not be a waiver of or predudc the exercise of m1y right or remedy. 12. SIICCeSSOnl oad AsaJp.a Bouad; JolDl and Seftral LIDbWty; Co-alpcn. Tbe ~nants and agrccmcots of this Security lmuwncut dmll bind ood benefit the successors and m.:1ips of Lcndu a.ad Borrower., subject to the provisions or pangrapb 17. Borrower's canveouta aad agreements sball be joint and scYCtDJ.. Ally Borrower who co-&igna lhil Sccwiay lnsuumcol but dOQ no& czccutc the Note: (a) is CO-sipi.a.g this Security lnstrumca.t only to m.ongagc. grant and convey that Borrower"s intc:rcst iD the Property under the terms of this Security Instrument; (b) is QOl pcnoaally obliaa!cd to pay tbc sums sccur-~d by this Sc:cwity lnsuumca.t; and (c) ngrce.s that Lender aad any other Borrawcr may agree to cxaend, modify. forbcM or m~c aoy accommodations witb regard lo the terms of this Security lasuwnent or the Note wit.bout lha.t Bom,wcr's consent. 13. LoDD Cbnrwcs-It the IOGD secured by this Sccurily lmtrumcnt is subject to a law which ac&a muimum lc>aA ds.ergcs. :t.nd that law is finally interpreted so thal the interest or other loan c.bargcs coUcctcd OI' to be coUcc:tcd in coDDcctioo witJt tbc IOOD exceed tho pc:nnillcd limils, tbcu, (a) aay such loaa charge shall be rcduocd by Iha a!IIOIIDl occcssmy 10 rcduoc lhe charge 10 the pcnnl11cd limit: aad (b) aoy sums already c:ollc<tcd &om Borrow.r wbicb.cxoccdcd pc:rmiltcd limitawillbo refunded to Bonowcr. Lcnc1cr may choose to make lhls refund by rcduciag Iha principal owed under the Nole or by mak.i:q a dircd pa)'IIICDt lo B~. lf a refund reduces principal. the reduct.ion will be treated as a partial prepayment without aay prepayment chsrgc under the Note. WASIIJNGl'ON.sln&Jc Panlil)'-FNMA/1'11LMC UNUORM INffW.UMENT Fona 3048 ,/to (}IOr1' J of S) Dao Ot31 (04-91) FPSSM-.3 -·-.,. . -'. . -) . ' . . • ,:' • • -·-· ·,-!::!',~-~- i \ \ l I .I l ·l i \ 1 Q i { I ' ., ::1 J ' I 14. Notk:a. Airy notJcc to Borrower provklcd for in this 5ccurity lbSll'Umcnt shall be givca by dclivcriag it or by mniling it by r .... cJus moil Ulllca appUcablc law requires use o! anotbcr IJl!'lhod. The cOlia: aball be -cd to the Property Addrcu or any ot.bc:r ndcln:sa Borrower dcsigoa.1ea by aOUC:C to Lender. -Ally aolia: to Lender shall be given by lint dma mail to L.cadcr'a addreu allltcd bcrcin or aay other addrcu Lender cks,ipntu by notice to Bom,wcr. Any notice provided £or in this Security lm&n&mcal sball be deemed to have been given to Borrower or Leader wbca given as provided in this paragraph. 15, C...-laa .....,. Sc¥embUI~. This Security lnstrUmcat sli.U be goveracd by Ccdual law and the law or the juriadlelioa in which lbc PTopcny i& located. lo the CYCDI. tha a.ny provisioa or dausc of this Security lmlrumcnt or the Note coaflida wil.b applJCDblc law, •uch collflld &ball aot affect other prcmsions or this Security lmtnamcnt or tbo Note whidt can be given cfl"cel without I.he conflic:liag pl'CMlion. To tJais end tho provisiom of this Security lnsuumcat ud the Note arc dcdaRd to be KVCl'ablc. 16. Bo.........,. Copy. Bom,wcr shall be si-oac coa!ormcd copy o! tho Note ... d a! this Security IIISUwtacaL 17. 'lmasfcr of &be Ptopu1)" or a BendJdal Interest III Boni,wer. If all or any put oCthc Property or aa.yi.atcrcat illkis sold or tramf'crred (or if' a bc.acfidal intcrcs& ill Borrower is sold or uamlcrrcd a.ad Borrower is not D aatural person) wilbout Leader's. prior wriuca C011SCDt.. Lender may, at its Qplima. requir'a, immcdia&c payment ·la full of 1111 111111& ICCUl'Qd by this Security lastrumcaL H_.., this optloc shall aol be mrcrdscd by Leader iC c,r.1111:iaa Is prombilcd by !cdoral law u o! tho data or this Sccuri&y JmtnmcaL IC Loader eacrcilca lhls optlon. Lender aball give Borrower aotla, oC accdcrulioa. Tha mtlcc &hall pra,idc a period or aot less lhan 30 clays rrom lbc elate the notice is delivered or mllilcd wit.blc which Borrower must pay all auma secured by this Scc:urily lasUumCDL If Bonowcr fails to pay thcso :1wm prior to Lbo cxpiratioo or 1h11 period, Lender may &m'Okc any re.medics pcnniucd by this Security lmtrumcat without further notlc:c or dcmaad on Borrower. 18. -Rlpt IO RdllalOCc. JC Bonowor med& ccnaia eo11dltloas, Borrower shall baw the ript to ....., coforccmcnt or this Security lastrumoct dlscoatiaucd at ""Y time prior to tho -ucr o!: (a) 5 days (or aut:h 91hcr period as applicable law may spccil"y !or rcimtat-oct) boforo sale of the Property punuanl to 1111!' power of salo coataiacd in lhls Sc:curi1y lastrumcat; or (b) cct,y or a judpacot ca!orc:iag this Scc,my lamwacot. n.-canditloos ore that Borrower. (•) pays Leader all awaa wbicb then would be due Wide, &his Sca&rity lUlrumcm &md lhe NOR as lC ao ac:cclcratioa bad oc:curn:d.; (b) cures any dcCaull o! aay other COVCIWllS or agn:cmc11ta; (c) pays all C"PCDIQ incurred ill enfon:iag this Sc:aarity lns&rumeat. Uldudlog. but not limited to. reasonable attorneys• fees; and (cl) taJcca aucb. acdon as Lender may rcuooably require to assure that the lien of this Security lmtn&mcnt. Lender's rigbts IA the Property and Bonowa"s oblig:atioa to pay the 1uma scaared by this Security Jastrumcnt ab.all coatinuc unchanged. Upoo rclulatcmcat by Borrower. this Security lnstrumcat and the obligations secured hereby 1ball rcmaia. fully clJ'cc:Uvc as if no aa::clctatioa bad occurred. H~. lb.is right to reinstate ahall not apply in tbc case of accdcration under paragraph 17. 19. SAie of Note; ~ or Loc.D Senlca'. Tbc Note « a put1al interest in the Note (togc.c.bcr witb tbis Security lmtrumcDI) may be sold one or more times without prior notice to Born,war. A aalc may rcaul& la a cbaD&c in the cDlily (known as the ·Loan Scl'Yic:cr-) that collects monthly payments due under t.b.o Noce and this Security ~L There. also may be one or more dmagcs of the Loan Servicer umclatcd to a sale of the Note. If there is .D change of the Loan Servic:cr. BotTOWU will be givca written AOliCO or the dwtgo in accorducc with paragrapb 14 above ud"-p'pUc:nblc law. The aodcc will stale the name :md address of the new Loan Scl'YICCI' and the addrcu to which paymcnts ahouJd be made. Tbc notice will also con1aia any other in.formntion required by applicable law. 20. Hazardoaa SnblJtaoca. Borrower shall aol cause or permit the presence. me. disposal. storage. or tclcasc oC .any Hazardous SubslaDc:ca DD or in the Property. Bofl'QWCr 1ball not do. aor allow anyone c1sc to do. anything nlfeCWI& the Property thal Is ln violation oC any Environmental Law. The prcn:cding two ICDtc:acc& aball not apply to the prcac:aa::i. use. or storage on the Property or smGll quantities of Hazardous Subsuinccs that arc generally recognized to be approprialc to nomual residential mes and lO moiatcoancc of tho Property. Bonowcr sh.all promptly give Lender written aotJcc or ay in.vcstigalion, c:la.im. demand,, lawsuit or other ac&ioo by any gow:rnmcnual or regulatory agency or private party iavoMDS the Property aad any Hazardous Substance or EnYiroamcntal Law of wbicb Bonowcr has 8ctual knowledge. IC Borrower lcaras. or is notified by aay gawnuncat.ol or rcgulatoty authority. that any removal or ot.bcr rcmccliatloa o( any Hazardous Subslancc Afrccaiag tbc Property is necessary. Bol'l'O'CI' ah.ill promptly lake all ncc:csaary remedial aCUoas in nccorducc with Enviroamclllal Law. As used in this puasraph 20. •Hazardous Substances• arc those aubsWlCCS ddincd as toxic or huardom substances by Eavironmcntnl Law and the followia,g subslaac:cs: gasoline. kcrmca.c. other Oammablc or tOKic petroleum products,, toxic pcsliddcs and herbicides. wlAlilc aotvcnu. materials coataini:ng mbcstos or lonnaldchydc. and radioad.i\l'C materials. As used in this paragrapb 20. •Blwiroamcntal LaW" mcus federal laws and laws oC the jurisdiction where the Property is located lhat relate lo health, saf'cty or cnrironmcalal protection. NON.UNIFORM COVENANTS. Borrower a.ad LcAdcr further COYCD4Dl and ugn:c as follows: JI. Accelenatloa; Remedies. Lender sbDU sift Do&lce lo BOl'TO'\ffl" prlDII' to aa:elcnUoa roUawtaa Bonvwcra breach or any coftllDDt GI" op,:icmcDt ID thla SecurUy lostrvmellt (but not prior to acczlaadon aader poraa:rapb 17 aalaD oppUcablc law proYldca olJM:rwbe). Tbe aodce •ho.II apedl): (D) tbe ddault; (b) the ac:tloa nqulm to Cllft Ute ddbult; (c) D date. not lcsa th.DD 30 doya from tbe dote tbe aoda Is u;:lftll to Bot a cwu, by wbkb tbe dd'Dalt must be Cl:'nd; mad (d) thGt ftulure to cure die delbult oa or Wore die cm&c apcdlled ID the ootle11 may re:!11110. ID accclerodoa of the IUIIUI secured b)' tJala Security Jmtnuneat and azi1e of tbe l'r'operty ot publlc auctloo nt o date not lam tJma llO dDya lo Iba lutuft. Tlae aotlcc almll rurtbu- lnfonn Bornraa-of die rigbt lo RWUl&e afkr aculeniUoo, die rla,bt to brlaa a court ocdoD to assert tbe DOD-abteacc of a default or aa.y other dd'cmc of.Bon'l,wU lo acaluadoa mad sale, aod DDy olher matterD requlftd to be lndadcd In the aatlce by appllcable ""'· If tlle delbult Is aot cared an ar before tlle elate 1p,clllcd In tlle aotla,, Lmdcr at Ila option 111117 require laamrdlaJe PQ11DeDt la llall or all ..,... -,,red by 1111s Secorily lmtrumult ...tlllaul luribor demoad DDd may lavobe lhe .,_-or IDie ... d aay atller remedies pcnaltted by appllmble law. Lader abaU be eatllled to collect D11 ers ,., lncu~ In pursuing the nmeclla provided III tb.b parqrapb 21. llldudlng, but not limited to. neasoamble otlonleyl' rns aad costs or UUe ffldcac:e. · tr Leader IDWD!sa tbe ~r of SAie, Leader shall atve wrllten noUc:c to 'nuatee ol lhc OCClll'l'CDCe or DD CYCul of dd'ault aad or Lender's eb:ctlon to muse the Proputy to be sold. Tnastce i:uad Luuler shall tDh.e sucb acdoa repnllq aodcc ol sole and ab.DII give aucb aodc:cs to Bcwao.:a" DDd to otbe.r penou CUI applicable law may require. Miu-tbo time required by applicable I.Dw mad ancr pubUmUoa or tbe not.Ice or snle. TNstcc, wit.boat drmnd oo Bew a ewer. shall sell the Property at public audloa to tbe hl&laat bidder at tbe limo cad place aad u.ndcr the terms dalpnlcd ID &be nol&cc of SDI• la one or m""' pan:els &11d In 001 order Trusue dotc,mlaes. 'l'rllllrc 111117 paslpcac snle or lh• Properly rar • pulad or periods permitted br appUmble low by pubUc 11D11ouacement at the lime o.ad place fixed la the aotJce ol SAie. Lader or Ill dalpcc IODY plll'daAse the Property ol any sale. WASlllNCTON..slnsfc l"'amll1"fNMA/n1LMC UNIFORM INSTRUMENT Form Jo,&cl 9/to (pap .f of SJ Doo 0137' (04-81) FPSSM-4 ~,,,-.... T>; • -~ ' T~ • ·.- \ I ) .', • ' •! f ! \ \ l i .1 • ! l & ·I I I ! • l :1 J 1 ' -' ' ' --) ---~--. -· ------~-------- I Tnlllleo abl>ll --10 tl,e .,..-... Traa_.a deed -..,i,,a ti.e Pro-..ttboat aay .........,, ..,.......,...17, "'II-or lmplkd. Tloe rcdtahl la u.., 'l'nlaum'• -oball bz_primm -ffl-or tlae tn,U, ., .... ..._ .. _de lbp,dn. Tnloteo olmll opp!J I.be pa In aru.. 1113b ID Uan foll"""'8, ardon (a) IO all-of die Diile, la<ladlag, bat aot Umlled lo, nnsnan,.._ 'l'nlntm'n nad nn .....,.. reen; (b) to all aaraa -by U.:. Secarily lantnuacat; ud (c)..., m:ao IO die pc,n,-or pm, ... louoll1catlded lO ltor lO die cleru of die D11pnol'"""" af""' CD11D'7 ID -""'nale taoll ,.__ :n. Ill .q = Upna poymeat or oll llUIIUI accurcd by thls Sca,rity lutnlment. Leader alu>II rcq,,ent Tnllleoeo rccoaw,y tbc Property nad alu>II ""'"'8der lhia Scalrily lmUument· ODd 1111 aotca c:videnciag debt ........i by tma Sccarity lmlnimcDl lD Truatcc. Truatec alu,11 rcconvoy tbo Property wilbout worrnaty lO tbo -or pcrna,,a lcplly entitled to it. Sucb person or pcrllOIIS llholl pay nay rccordAlion c:oslL Leader may dwge 1ucb -or pcrarms a rec ror r .c1i.og the Property, but AD11 If tbo rec ia paid to n third pillly (llllCh ns tbo Trustee) for ....,.... rendered aad the thargiag of the rec ia pc,mlttcd Wider npt>licablo law. 21 Sa'nff...,,, Trcudm. ID nrmnloncc witll oppllcoblc IAw, Leader IIUlJ' &om alma to limo nppoiat .a sun--sor trutee co nay Truatcc appouucd hcrcm,dcr wbo baa ceawl to ad. W"ltbout ...._ of Ibo ~. tbo auca:uor......., shall .........i Co all tha title, -nad dutiellCOllfcn'cd upon Trustco bcrci,, nad by applicnblo law. :Z4. Uoo of Ptapaq,. 'tbc l'lapcuy fa aot med prlacipally for qricullllnd or fummg purposea. 25.. IUcl:z:n, to tlalo SecuU;y bmtnmmL If ODC ot' more ridcm arc C-OdCd by BOl'TVWCr end recorded together with Lbia Security IDIUumcat. the can: oat, m1d ape: racn«e of enr.b ,ucb rider aba1J be iac:orporntcd iato and abnll amcod oad aupplemDDt tho -Dlld _agrcementa or Uaia Scalrily lmlrumeat aa If tha rider(,) were n part ..r thla Security IDUrumcot. (Cicck applla,l,lc boa(ca)J 0 AdjuatableRataRlder O Oruduntcd Paymc:at Rider 0 Ballona Rider O Other(•) (apcclfy) D Coadamiaium Rider 0 Plormed Uait Oevdopmcat Rider O RalO 1m_... .... Rider 0 1-tPamilyRidcr 0 lliw=kly Payma,t Rider 0 Sccoacl Homo Rider BY SIGNING BELOW, Borrower accepts Dlld aarccs to tho torma nod -contaiacd ill pagca 1 throup Sorthls Sccwity lastrumcat ODd la oay rider(•) cv:o•m by Borrowor and recorded with it. -------------=(Seal) -Bomrwcr SacWSccurityNumbcr ____________ _ STATE OF WASHINGTON, :a!1G to mo bown lo be tha iadMdual(1) dcscnl>od la and wbo executed the Coregoizag inatrumcat. oad admowlcdgcd to me &hat fllB!' cigacd and acalcd lhc ufd imlnlmcut oa '%1111:IR free mul voluntary act and deed. Cor tho usca aDd purpoacs therein mCDtiooed. WITNESS my baad and offidal seal allla,d the clay ycor la this certificate above writt=. My Camminioo c,qrircs: 1/1/97 REQUEST FOR RECONVEYANCE ToTrus<ec: n reaidiag a.l: Koa.rOe Tbc wulcrsipcd is tho balder of the nous or aotca accurcd by this Deed or Trust. Soid aotc or DOies. together wn.b 1111 ol.bc1' mdcbtcdacs.s iccurcd by tbis Deed ofTruaL, haw been paid in rulL You nrc bc.reby dlrcctcd to cancel said note or notQ aacl this Deed or Tru&t. wbicb arc dc1ivezed hereby, ud lo rcconw::y. without wanuty, all I.he cstD.tc now held by )'ffll under this Deed o( Trust co the person or pcnom lcplly catitlcd thereto. D111e: ----------- WASHINGl'ON-slqlo PluaU1-1NMA/111LMC UNll"ORM INSl'llUMBNT Foro J04D P~ (poca S of lJ ODo 0130 (04-91) FPSS84,.a t"'--,-.-, • ~-~?~ . . ~ .~ . . ) .. :=t~"~'f.J'G~,~11~tit,~~!~1 , .. , . , I = ' I 0 -::.- • THE EAST 111\LF OF TUE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTJIEJ\ST QUARTER OF SBCT%0N 1t • TOWHSUIP 23 NORTH. RJ\NGE 5 EAST. WILLl\MB'lTI!: MERIDXAN. IN KINO CCUNTY. WASIIINCTON1 EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID EAST JU\.LF OF '1'11£ NORTtlWBST QUNtTER OF THB sourttBAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTXOtf 14 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOffS t DEOU~HINQ AT TIIB SOtmlDST CORNER OF SAID SNIT 111\LP OF THE NORTHMBST QUARTER OF TJI.B SOUTHEJ\ST QUARTER AS TUE POI!ff' OF TRUE BEOINNDIO 1 THENCE NORTII 2s•21 • EAST 523. 99 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SJ\I.D EAST HALF OP 'nlE NOATIIWEST QUI\RTER OF TIIE SO\ffllEAST QUI\RTBRt TIIBNCE NORTH ou•o7• se• WEST Gs:;s\.~1 FEET TO TR£ WEST LINE OF DAID EAST HALF OP THB NORTIIWEST QUARTER OF TIIE SOUTJIEAST OUARTEA1 TtlENCE SOUTH 0•27•os• M£ST 52S.B2 FEET TO TIIB SOl.ffll LINE OF SAID EJ\ST.IIALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUI\RTER OF TIIE SOUTHEAST QUNlTBR I THENCE SOurtl aa•17• 35• EAST 653 .84 FEET ALONG TIIE souru LINE OF SAID EJ\ST HALF OF THE UORTIIWBST QUARTER OF TltE S0UT1l8AST QUARTER TO TJ1B TRUB POI!n" OF BEGINNING: AND EXCEPT COUNTY ROADS. =~,--' . •' -' --' ~ t~ ~~-... • • .., .... ""··, , ••• -.··~ Ltc.;,,!·': ,,\ '" • ' ~ L. • • • • •• , ' \17', " ' ;, -:.· .. · .. ., .. r ., ,,., • fl ' 801 2nd Ave.• S\1:1.te 100 Saattla, -98104 l<l.NGCOUlNT'( CDGOIT UDIID At+ft;Sh,, 801 Second Awnuo, SulO 100 Smida. Waahfnrgkln &a1Q4.1510 (208) 382-1888 DA.VXD A. NYBUM AKO DEBIIA L. AU3LSO ~fty lDeecl1 of Trust IH!ome Equity Uoe of Cn:dlt ._, "'·"-· PCllrl"IQil NDRDiWl!S'l' (lUARl'BR OF 'l1IE SOl1lHBAST QUARTER OF =r:ra, l.4, "l'QQ&ilP 23 NORnt:. RANZ S EAST. ~•~TU Paklft or ACIC'OUN No.: 142J05-9009-C)4 13-ClilCAm INS. CO REF# //,':>~ , 19 .,, b,' THIS DEED OP 11UJ5T Is pal on ee, t.&iiLSr 12 c .MVXD A, MtBLCM AND IJBBRA L. ATPTSO, HUSBAND AND WZFE --------------=--===~'~ rdcned 1u lndmduaUJ ur mlk:a)wty, • the CONCD mar~ a.a·C~to gnc;ACP Trl'LE D60RANCB CX>IPANY w1-.~b 1800 QJJnffO?ia g,nter, 701 Fift:h. Avenue, SreattJ.e, WA 98104 r~·>. tor 11,r bencftl cl JUNO CXJUNTY CREDIT UNION', la :AX1CCUOn and ue.laN. •'-..W.-b 8fll.9ccurtd A..._, S~ 100, xaUJc. ~ 9910.,1,10 C-8-cflrill!IY"). Onn10f doa hnebJ' ...... ~ and warranl ED TRISICC. in'-• wllb .._., ol .::ile-, the-above dncl1bn;I P")P'flY klcMftl In 1M c.r.-y ol ltin9 Sahl' of \S'aahin.-,. which baa 1he .,-. addl'em ol 1360§ 158th AYDa SE, Amrtqn, WA 98059 , 1Ulfth,er wkh Cl) all .mp.a•cc • bwkUflp or ~ al any m..._ ~. nuw ,,.. hrn=lh-r ~ on lhe propeflJ'. CW ell fba:...-indudl"fl all phimt:Ma. hil:-.allnM,. aU ~~ -.id ,1allilauntc cquipnml. ,,._. , .. hefr.aflr, lot'aued under. on or~ IN pn,peny. C"9l au ,w-. ~ renu. ~. ~ oiJ ... , ea ,..hi.• and ~. ienl"meno•. ~-rtatu,,ol, w~·. --. &pjAI .:la;.n appwtcnancc::L M rtpanan ri,dll,i nuw or lu:n=afkr hrlnnain& nr In any way appcrubMnf; tr, the JWOPC'"Y, and (Iv) au of 013111ar'• "*"· 1k)e and lf1tffW"III fn and tn •nr -. rishoH-of-wwy. :d...,.... ... •r1P'!I ol land now ~ ~ ~ ~ indudlna any ~ and ackilllkMla au....,. or,,_ r,-.""18 All or tt.. (Off'II06na ls c:olkcUYel.,· rd"~ 11) ln thla l>c:cd of Tl\dl &" dM •propeffl•, • THP.: PROPP..-rv ~ Nt:JT' ll!liP.n PAIP..'l'lPAU.V POR A("',RJc:tJLnJRAL OR FARMING ..uRPO!'ll!S nMS l>ccd o/ TIUIA l1 for dw purpc1M ol llftWtna die plymcnl nl al.I ~ indU<ling prinripal. tncflat. ~ <- heretnahcr defined> • .W aha' amouna. finance charpc:s. ~ymema !Ind pn:miUffllO di.: and dw pnfo1n111n<'C' ol aU obfi,p,iM, dla1 Or.lNOI' "°"" or hcft=,afler _. Bendk1aty w.dff this Deed ol TNa aud unckrr d-c.'eflain asn,em,nn yuw,rm,"11 Or.llnlCl"'I Open• end Honw £qulry Cftdk Nan r--.:1 lrllo t.tween Gfanaw and Bcnefldary ol even d:Me hnvwtlh ("A.-"). lndudlna aU c:lltcnskans. _..._, Ind o,odlfla.UDN ~Call cl .ud1 ~ 1Jein8 ~-n:fcnl:u IU aa Ihm •Dcbc"). 1be ~ hu a c.ffdlt bm6I of S 40 1 00Q ,QQ UNC5il CM' llnlill la ncn:ucd and • noticC' ol -b ---=--la n,:,cun;lcd NI 1M Offlc:e ol 1M C:0.HK\' AudlcUf ta \M tt!UMY whft'e lhi:t o-d o/ Tnm. hu been ~ nm Dad al TNll is b cbcr purpmc al aG."""8 e -'.wir,a cnda. loan and liml -am: ,_ anly prwendJ' ~ ~ Yndltr IJle, ~ !)la: ..., ~'1!5, r,lbcthn Midi~ -uhltpao,y or co be made II \he oplJOn of Bcndkiary, or ~UI'. as arc, m,oe •11hn TEN ~ )._. fmrn &he date hemof, IO \he aam,p aaerw as U" sucll fun,,e edYanccs •en: fflMM' on the claw ol the ~ ol dWI Deed of Tnm. 1khr-..gh 1hcft, nay he nn adr.1""9 nDCW at the dnW ol ft~ ol dlllro Deed of TN:1111 And allbouclh lhcftt mav be no lo 1 t r -MXUrN hndwy .,.,.,., .wA:w ~ thr ,~ any actvanc» b rmda T1M:' liffl of du Dc«I ol Trusr ll1all he valid u IO all iudc:b.a:dnuw.---=' hond,y, indud4na furuNo ach'W'ICIS, from the um. ol Ill fWna ror rwcontlna 1n lhe otnm r,/ !he <:.uunc)· Auduor tn the rounty In which 11M: Pn.'f'C'l'Y b b:alll!'d. TIM: 1oaJ. -ol indetudnc:N, -.WW twnrt,y ma,· 1nc.-or dea'll:Ue from ume to c.inw. tAM the tnal unpu.l balance ul iniJt.bcfttneu .te'CUffld hc:m,y (lndudin& ,H1be1 IWIIU wtuch Bcnd'IUMY may nvJw undff tho o-d of T-. d11.. Apwlncnl or :any ntMI' documa:11 wtlh ~ dleftol) at an','" OfW u,nc: ~ shall not c:,r.o,ed thcr cl'edJl bmit ICI rc.lh ahrw. pbD 6nlc:I.--' law~ ~ ma11J011 ..t any ~ ot dsb'I Whl..lA -+a6d'I Benc:ftaNy nvy ..... .,.__ en dll.. ~ al "-o.:.m al T-. U1C ~ or any othc:r dol;urnc:N wilh re,pc:c1 U'll..lftQ, lnCluc;Uni: DUI ni:a Urru&ed ao ponna11 rot-. aperiaJ , •••= or tnsurallC'e on cti. Propeny ..._. .... ~ on -uch dilb:t WIIWA. Thia o.ed o1 n... .. ln!l..nded to a.Id -'..ii ..... Hd and t... pnorllY _. aU IUb:loqlteN ue- al'ld ~ lndudina llarutofY liens. ~ tallCS a,ld I i.SWW lc:,,ic:d un lhc: Pmpc:rly ,_ ye! due and peyable, ID IN c:x1eN ni IN --.-n ---!ICCUft'd hc:teby. The: unpaid ba&enc.'c: al ~ -.trins ~ but '""" ;a1 ceru6n m,.-be -..rg. A Zl..l'O belanc,r doc:s ni;a ~ the ra¥0&,ina: aedJl kJmn ot Bcnefkiary'a obliepdrM ID adwancwr """"-&o 0.--. Tbaduf,r, the u..n ol di-. De..d ol TN-I ..iU .-naln In full force and c:ffea: ~ eny -m&ar.• . ...... n---UIIII'-~ ..... ---- ., . I I ! !ii I il< a I I t! l5 .. -s = DEED OIP 'Dlusr (condoued) A. IIIBRUi!SllN'l'AUONS ClfDNCW hmleby .cpcuc.-110 Bcnafkary a ~ I. YalllOly G6 OocC'ay ta> "nle CACUdoft. ~ al!d JM,ibc " br 0~ r,f rtw Aa,eenwm. dds Dcftl ol Trua 1111d all othff docvla:ml. and inanNn,au noo, a, hCfellll..-fuJlllilhed IO &mdlctllry IO cwdrnKw CII' 9ffUN pD)"IMIIIIII al ft. Dd:a (dW ~ l>oa--."l. and dNt bc.ccab:.. uldcucecl b,y die ~ wdl -wtolaw •DY pnwtuon ol lnr. ant' Old« of any coun or Olhcr •llffl'C'Y nf ~ GI' ony fflOll'IIPilC', lftdenhMe. UWII ape,nl'tCdl or otlwr ~ cu whkh enn,,,a,, • • .-.,, or t.,. aohkh er..-or sn, ol c.nuaot"o IJICIPCnlY l9 tx-ld, or t.. tn conflla Wilh. a. di lftUII kl a maecrial ~ 1111 cw OllflMitulle (wilh _..., nulk'I!' and/cw bp» ol lime) 11 ddaub under any a.ch~.~. uua ~ •• mhff ~ or -.a. in 1be '°._..,.,, o, 11, : u : of ...,. lten. c11aqpr a, flCUlllbrllw ol any mnw upon _,. n1 ennuw·• JIIGPn'Y cw ....._ cacq11 • UeMl)l) lf.,,.d,,rp.o; ...... Mo/llw~~I~ (bl nw 5ecwu7 Documen1S. u llftd •heft aecuce4 and dcUwfed a,y an..ur. cons:111uw ctw 1ep1. -w 1111d htndlno: or-114 •tnnr GI Gnuw In oceo,adanc• wtch lheir sesp!JQfflr lfflm Albf«c IO oppUc:irblrbonk,upaq and :b•A Ci.CW ..... i. Olll=r All dt-=r ~. ~ p;ap:19 _. dam r-10 Renaf"ociuy, or w Bclldidary'• lepl cOUftld.. MUI ~ tu c.-.:w. Iha' ~·. or tha IDln ~ hr tho~ Ducumcnla -aauiaac and CUIKC1 tn an nwenal re,ipaa. and cunas--....,,_ _ ,011.pkMUx= Jff:11 IIC' -,,.1n ,re~• uua-,1111 oa:umle' ~ ol V._,... tn1111er !,. 'Dd& Granaor hu Fad and m,;uketable tide In r_. simple IIO ltw Pft,peffJ' l,ee and dnar ol .n ~--~ fur ~ol ncard u al dNt dale' al dlb Dftd t#Tr\11:1. a.u.or wUI ,,.._._ Udde' ID the P1opltfty and will ,...,_,.cwwaa.N and ddend 11M mme 10 Denefktalyand di (Of'lf'Wflcovenanland clri'end lhe .-aildllr .,,cl~ ol&t. Kn o/1hw.1'lftd ulT..-. of. l...btz; 111CN' .. nal aDW' pcndi:l'lg cw .... W acd ...... o, ~ 1M Jlfopl::wy, W, IO SM knowlodAr d GninNW, i:s lhien!-~pl,a,C'ICI. any Odkwl. auot cw pu.cedio1a •• t.w tW in CJqlMIY or l,r or bdoff any llCIIRinisuad-•ltfllCY whkh. ii ....,,_ly d..1c,:11b.nl. wouk.l isap;cr .--*-ncly llil'as 1M -.llld or opaauun ol lho PmptnJ. ~. anwL-c n I c o,...,., o...-.or shaU indemnify and hold llendlcta.,. ._,..._ tap1rw and ''°'" ...,. aJld ata kaa. .......... damaa,cr. cbiffl ot e:11:pel'de (lndudinA,. ......,_. lll:nlZallon. any and 1111 IIUCN'IW)"• fees or~ ol lllllpb'm) lncum:d ,w ~ by fte-neftdarT on occ;aum ol tu d,e AocakNI IJft &ho P,openy 0/( _., chertllmb. maccrilll. ~. ,w CONarninan1 (lnriuduqf. wtlhoul lbnltadon. oU. peuo&cum produaL ~ ..-. Carmaldo..,.._. l<iam ~. haa,doui,i -and/tw mu: --au). dw ~ cw --., of -takh DI' dlC' aqMJIIUf'C IO ,which ia ~ limkd. Of' ~led by any (eden.I. IUIC'. 1.,i,umy. tepxDI. <W loc:11 ji<i•aaaw..e,w.l UIUI. •flC'"CY' or•~. or ..t,tctt ~. _..,_cw-..-,-mar r--• haaad a, t..-allh and u.r~. cw cu, CM folhln! by Gt11ncor °" any pnor owner°" occup:uv old..:-Prnpl.-ffy "'1 ~,i,mpy -.h any 11pplk...,.. ro:dr:-r.al. aaec. counry. ~ « Joc:al cnv~ bws.. ~ •nd «MNI or adrn1n•nu._. cwdcff, B. ADDmONAL COYll!NANTS Unsff the enan Debi .... have' been r-kl In fulL Gr.anu,, ~ 1111d ~ ;u rulk-,,.• 6 ~ of Gnanlaf' 91.aB u,ncty p;ay and dlKha,. thcr Debi OIi any f"ll&" lheftof in 11ecntdai1N' wuh er,nn and n..Mt"'-ul Iha: ~. dl1s Deed '11 Tnut. :lnd the 5eautrt· DoturncrllS. 7. ~ of'rlmaJ CDd ft mcne:, Cif2ftlOII' .tl;,U d.,fy pay :and~. 1W UII-In he p:aid and Ji..:haqccd aU rad CSUIC' Uld .,.._.. Pl'opcTly .__. and incMf Witn ;and 2""=" IWIW.. puhlk' IW' priv:IU:: WlllCl' 2nd -nlCICII and ~ all Cllhft AZ. =•• ...... Of'J-iQD CIIUIWl-1 chaa8n ap;Akablc tolhl! ~ an, tnwi'all nr ttlllaCWJ'.efllllrb~ felPCC\10 anyol atw (~ and chal'R'ftl for any ~ or=~ •••......inn! few dlC' bcndl o# da "'°Peffn ,:enD'lll and ...,_ ~ or a,f'IIOidlnafy. r-nr unf~ 11( any kind anal ~ .... 1.--"ff whkh nuiy • any 1imc priot 10 ot ar.n ~'°" nl du Offd ol'l'nail. he =---d, lericd, or ~ upon lb¢' ~ or d,e -" or lna:>me-~ ;het.efa,om. "":any u,e nr occupaney 1hirtft,f. NI n/ the f1,rqpJffll: an: hcn=in.lftcr ~, .efnt'lld IO L... ... • ..... • Gra-shall ~ ~,y wah Afllllanary pcuol ot pa~ ul any a ,.es_ wilhin 1cn ( 10) days ol llw dale any sud'a ,._._.. anr due. In~~ CJr.ancor (alb tn 1imdy s-'r 11ny -..ch &ra m:r:ru. 8cncf'lcia,y may. bul lhall ... be abtipcd ID. rmft saK°h paymcnla .... :.ny amount: .-paid hy ~..,. llhall _.,,_ Adn.r,cma in ~ "'ilh Ponwaph 16 hneaf'. a Haaaft1 Gr:anl(IC' sl\aU kecs, .hr ...,_o,c11w1w nr,w rw.W:ltqi: nr tlC'ft'llllwr -,cd,.,, ,tw Pmp,rny irwuntd 11pinsl tc- by Rn:. ~ included Wkhln lhc wnn -~~.-and any rxhcr .__,. b whill:h fknd"Ebry RlqUifOI ~-It the Prop,::ny t., ~ ln an _,_ ~ by UW l>lr'leclOI' ul tho:-l'ftk'ffl P~y Ajp..'ftCY' -• ,p.:ial Jloud haDUd 11rea. Gr.anlue :a,--"" otxain F-eoer21 t1ond lnounna: ,., 1tw ~ -" __,_ _. ~ rnr ,,-trtm nl 11111' kmn llftd for the (ull ~ ol the-k>An insumnnr ~ WWI ~ malnQrrwd In •hr ::unoun111 :and fnr 1t.c p,rirxb 1hal lkndidaly n!q',lilw4 The inaunanc:c-camer ~ UW' w-shail he ""'-" h)• C:.,.,.,w .ul.-c" ti, .....,_,,ary'• :apP'U¥111 ... -hktl t.hall no,: be -·-All1n...u"flln" p,afk~ iand ,,_-.L" ahaU hr ao.,i.Yflllll,k, 1c, Himetk.ury and llhall llldude :a aand:ard mnftlPIIDU' clalnle. IM'ftC'fkl.:a,.,, -.haQ hiavo..• 1hi: rt,dlt 1n hold the' p11-.;c,. and n:rwwab. tr ~ry ~ 0~ shall name, u.ndk:b,y as ·~· 2nd .-.hall ~ ~ u, Jll!'nuf'kDI')" all ..,..-cip,. ul 11111d P"lffl*lffl.'I :and NTWW;..I ,-;c,c11,. In 1hl: -cnt tr/ k-. <.it11n1.,.. .tull IP"&: PftXl'IP. nolkT 111 1hr 6-ir.Jil'lt.'C' .. ~fflCI" and ~iar)" Bcndkiary """'Y n\a.kcl' pruai nf kat, If not madot ptDfflf'dy by Omnuw. 1 ·~ ~ and G...-u.hefwtlc IIJO'C'II' In -'linlll----..,...._. ....n he •pphcd tn rncnral~ or,..,.., ol the Pmp .. ~· d:muiccd. d 1,w rc:iu,nUOfl or ~lr b CC'CWlf'WftlClllly (r.w!W and ttn..-fln,uy• ..,,:vn1y ilo n1111 ln.1cncd or impa_.i H the rea,,rad,nn or l'IC'fUlr as not ~Uy ,-.._, nr ~" .. " M."l:Vrily -,ukf l,c, 1.:-s ni. impuft:d. I.he h'ISUni.nCe ~ '\ll;,IQ he applkd en tho: 911 ,ns ,ecu,nl t,y •hd lleCt.l ttl Tn•. whc.hcr r• "'• d'"' •b.:. widl any ~ pa,IKI IO GnullOf rr Cf'lltlUW alunJur\'t lhc Propeny. or d(Nr-. l'IOi ~ •"tlhtn !JO cbfll a r.lla'C ln-lkoa::...:ta•J lhaa chi: ---('afflrf hall~ 10 -..de II c.:l.um. men lloffletkbly l'JUIY cotic'C1 uw ,~ .,.. .. _... ·~· TTY1' UIIC lhc JlffL'C'CdA In rqmr nr ~ die Ptopnty •• lu pay --.-,.ued by 1hls oced nl Tt'\HI. wtwc~ or nr• lhnl •NC' 11..: ~ pcrio.d will hqpn when ~ nn.ka Is ~ t'~ 1~ and <':r.il'lh• oil~ ;..~ In wt'IIIIIR, an°"· uppbcauDn of pl'OCIICdl IO prlndpal lllaD ftDII c,r,tcnd or,.,.,,,._. the: di.IC' t.b.11l' n( 1nll' ""-hi)·,-,.....,..,_ n:l..m.:d"' in PIINW"4flh b or~ d1C' amoum ol dw Pllyr'.WfQ tr undcT P:ar.1,r.rph 21 !he.- I~ 19 xqulrcd hy fl,r,w.dk_,.,,. C.ftlfllllw"11 l'lghl In llftf "-.ce ~ and prucwm ~ fl"onl dasn:a#' Ill dw ~ p10I' 10 tJw ~ llh:aD r-11, tlnlcf'ln:ary 11• the calCnl ,,t lhr-~ hy aim Dc.S dTnm unmcdluc-Jt• 'P'10f' IO dw ~. 9 a.-pcilr. Gra-111\aU keep lhc-Pn::.pcny In ,tund oadc.' antJ et-..iMlun and maim .U ~ or IIPfll'OPdaUI Npaln,.. n:plaN:lmN:rU .n,d ,.._'ab, lhcrffCII OnlftlO"' ~ nna to pnmtl •w :aU.-any -1,I Iha Pm,pclty cw fft&kcr or pmnlll ID bC' nada •m•· 1nMCnal aaun.oon. DI' addnkll'M, to dw ~>fl'll"'Y th.al wcoukl tDve 1t.e cfl'en ul ~ !ht value ~ cw lh,il wt.II In any v.-.it in,:n:ue-tho: ri~ '11 a.ny nn-t'l4' ha1r:1«t "l'l."ltnfl c•II d dw.• "°"'"'IC"linn nr np:,wkW'I I~ OtanUlr ~ ..-to ahcT •• n:nx .... c-,any IIUUClure or nau,c, tn thir ~-""''Uhaut ~y·11 pnur W"'1Cn 1.'\IIW'lllfnll. Gr9111DI ~ ~ any an nr 1lunM ""'"IUCh n\lAhl advcncly cffca.,. unpau t!w ,"atuc-•• &aMfulno.·.-ol 1lw Pn-rcnr. 10 Polk: k.:J I rot c:d CMl::lky. In nw eYll'nl ul lM happcntnA ol any c:asuaky. ol :any kww.l or na&ur.z. ord6nal'Y or ~1..t1Jft.l.N1,.. •. r11n-..:n cw Ufll~ .-e11V'CTC'd ..,_. any lnllurance policy. ,nulUng In cbm:ap 1" or ~11.,iion nl the l'Topftly. Granltlll' ..hall pve l'IQUl.:4' ihlrNof IO ~ and Gran&u." lhall ,....,. a11 0,anllW'a _. a.t and ca1)ul'W. <llilllhCikC Mid ~ condnUc W'> l'IISIUN. ~. l'eflbcc'. ~ Oi' alw, ct. dDaagcd CW~ ~ .. nca,ty U pa,u,ohl<r In iuo. value-... ~ 1111d ..tui,,-a.er lmmc:diawly prior ID such damDp cw dn:lrucUon, II.Coen t ~ a.-. Onintor "-II P"Jfflf'IIY and lallM.aUy CIDlllply wilh. ~to and obaT o. a:,,nsaa by a~~ pmc114"dlnsP in wXld faMh all ~· Mid -.u ._.... cffurla -lb,--...... Ol'dklancea.. ru&cs. ~ and ,equ..,.._ nl -'"Y du.I}· conMilUMl"d JIO'l'ftT'fflC'fll:al :a1Mhuriiy nr •~ •nJ trl C'YCty haald ol h ~ havlltA ~-cw .....U.r ... ;•;' • (> ... .. .• I ·~ ·., ,,, ... ,, ... " .. -~ • txxly mtdli6llg ~ which ,nay be s;zs IF E I ID ll or IO die ~or., die -and nm..-ol .-. OCCUpanlt"f, oplrmdQn. ~lnllfflllnCe o, a«curm a al die........,., wbahff or no& CU&h i::lw, anitnan,o;,. rule. Older. n:pbuan or~~ J:zftlClm1II chanQa M IH.P..4•••-= OI' .._,,... wtlh 1M' UN Of~ of the l'fopmy. IZ. Pa Cl ol Od=:r' A(P GftUIIOI' .ohaU duty and~ pe,b9t. GIi ~ and • .....,_... espcwd as btnd:no upon a. ..... ...,. 4 • o1-,. ..-............ _.. lrwclh,a ttw PIOpfflY, ~ wMhout 1tm1tmon. au ru1cs and tepbdOfts, of II l awn or~ ~ 11 11w Prapc,nt • pan ol a candomlnlunl. ~. ph:ued •.clq.ed 0, Qlhn , ...... 11.MGCbalDn. 13, Gnlmuralall panlir Bedcfld;uy, a,u po.mrt0 ds;:;.-:d by , i:I tlD :WW.atik dmcll,, SD...,.. die~. 14. ft!abl ~ Gn1CDor aha,lL al Gnmlor'• .oM' COIIII lltld a:penN,--. inde:anlfy and hold die Tnas:aee and 8imcfl,ciuy, atK1 lhrir ~ officers. dilllQc:lo. cm,ilc; == nnd ..-.,, h=tnalem ....,_ and flraal an,. 1r$1fJ, clalnl. denDnd. adl. judg:mcnr. cmcu11an, ~. ~ d:aaa,Or or pfflalty' (~ ~ Mened IO • '"ClalrN'") .n'ecdn11 Ullt Praperry, or die ¥Ilk.le ol --, of dlo 5ecurtly Der ues. ariang Old al, n:addna frrm. or slleged m .,_ OUl ol or ....ea from. •ft'f IICdos'I or '"9a6on bf Q,wor, acep: -rna,-be die dbftl ,-all ~ Dendktaar-,_..,.,.a. 0-lhaU PIY' an ~ lnCUned hp dw T"""'*' and ftentflduy in ~ IIRtf .all NPnl ID an," and ;sD CIAirm. n-.-eapema da:all lndlNle-.U out-ol-pcx:ut ~ wch as lllltll'neyS and e,rpen:a' ,-. and ah;aU llllu indude thlill ~ ---al any am,tcit. .--cd by any ~ o/ 8cftdkiary. ,,. c.nu.=ur shd JmT o, ~ Tl'lllolCO and 8cftdldar( tor ad ~ •IIIJnle'P' rees. rauoMbll' -and e,rp,n1CS paid or laafflol.l bt' T""*"° o, 8endldilry ln -, ----. p JI 4 o, db:puW o/ •ny kind 111o which T~ o, Bfflidlciary Is ~ • JIICUIJ' or appears -JW1Y pllllmlff' or ddle. 7 ne ~ -,, oldie Sl:c:urlly Donu 1w1a. Glanror, or th-. ~. Jadudlno,. ~ Uadmk,n. &o die r. I NC or Giber ad.wa:.cPl oldlb Deed of nu.. -Y condemnacton ltwolvins tho Prop:rq,, onr lll:IIIDII IO pror,ecl dlll MCUrily her9ol', or...,. Cl CdlhA ffl ~ cw hlnlcnapeq,, and anp ,uctl ---paid or incur,-by a--ahaD c:aa:=dNle AIMlflGCS In wtlh Padllnph 16 haeol. 16. Adu In dNt C¥enl Grwitor &as IO pedonn any ms ~ ol Gnwor bp any ol lho Scautly Dol:ument• or m ,-,. wt-dale_,._..~ 10 he p,id by any al~ Sccuriry DocufflentD. Ba Cd • DlaJ', bl.II ....U not be oblipaal CO. make _.h psymmw or piuform IUdl oa.. .s..lCh ,.,,_,. or~ t,y ~ shaU tVIII ~ &he cffca cl antng an1 £-.. ol Oef•ula or ol GltllCMno chit dine (« DDJdna ...,.. payme,11 due bCIWndff or under the Ap:,cmcnL All ~ ~ J.i.:1 bl' ~. "'9ftbff w1lh .U cq,aw ~ In mu:ccdut.1 ~ at.u be d£cmcd Min..-r~·> under &)WI, Deed al nu.. and~~ ...n be b1u1 Wet,. duo .-1 .-rat-. and shall Ix~ ID lhe Od,t.. Adwncff ..tlaJI bcu ~ m,ffl tJ.. due esp:ndod .. lhe ,se ~ In &be ~ and 111d be ~ b, dab D,s,sl ol Tnasa: u lhoull,ft orialmDY a pan ol the prindpll ---ol lhe o.bc. 17. U:o ~ ahaU nDI uoe lhe PmpeffY ~ •ao-lhc ...._. io be UIZld o,-occupied for any unlawful pupr-ae or ln Ylola&kln ol any perm:2 0, ~-or.,. ..... ~-~ 0, ~ ~ ~ or .«ecuna the u..: or ~ thereot. or cuff'• 1111y .c1 IO br done or &ny c:ondblon to e:xi9t on dm ~ or •ny amde WI be brnuaht ~ tha& fllllY be ~ unta. ~ -,eqldred by b.w. °" dm may. bl bW. COllmlUlS • nllllmlllClt,, p,11blk' or pri-.ie. 18. OdDzr &Je:a=,,. GnullQr llh:all nal, wtlhou1 the prior Wriaen COflSl:!rll nl ~. c.-..: or pernlft 10 be~ o, ro remain. any .,..,...._ pledge. Hal.~ or ct-. on. 9C'C\wtlY linNn=M in. or I ttonel •Ae ot "II' other 1hllr IICtCNkXI •..-~• on<~ s-tor « mbu.dtnaw to &he Dens ollhc Sccuncy PoCvrnomu> lho J"lopfflr-inuornc ~ ocher cnzn dw Securicy DocurnrNa (·Lk:ns'"). ln Ila --w GntnlOI' f&'l• lO pmmpdy d....,.. any such I.Jam. &-ndklary nay. hul .tu.n net be obUptcd m. do au and aay .,,__..-Sor 5nQinod by a....dld:uy <~ rcuonablc ~• NO In~ thetewtlh). ,hall b9 ~ .. ~In~ wtdl PanaJll'IIPh 16 heteo(, 19.~o/1111=:t~. GffUrlffTdlall noc adl. ~. uansferor....., die Prapffly ... any bn'ldlrial tnlefle!l lhcn:in or ...,.. psttu.e:r-of. wi.:dlftbr openac,11 ollaw «Olhvrwtac. crilboul lhe pr..-...-.n~ nC sa.....tk,.,. In 1he~ of axh a mle. m, u; .....ae. ullftlllff or~ ~ -1. 81 .. opttun, J'C'qlJlle tmmedbac r-ym,nn tn fuU al aD aum:1 ..cu~ t,y 1hLS o..& ul Tnm. ~. lhia option llh:&ll nm he -=-rdMd by Hctaefldary ti enffbe o p.ohibMd br :appli,oablc law u ol tbo date a( lhla 000d gf T,ud. If llclldldary ~ ~• upl'°8 lO teqllft' law 1/aa. pa,m,n,, In full, Btnefk1art 11111111 st-GranlOI' no1ke al ~ The nc,tn at.al JNOWkk • period of noc lao 1han ,0 .Jays from •he due lhe nmKV la dcUYered or mailed Wllh1n. wh6dt G,,._-rnuS1 pay 1111 -,,ccun:d by &bll Deed ol Tiw&. lf Onlftlaf' bib IO pq d-. -prior IO the -puadan al lhill pntAd. 8endktary n1:1y Wlvol&e ...., ~ pomunad by dlia DNd of Trual 1lrilhoul funhl:r ~ or dn'nancf on a-. 20. B¥1rDc::. o4 Dc:8:::dl. n,e -.n l!'ll'Cftl ol Oefautf. -UMd in dw ~ l>oc'laalrnb. Ahal ....n the -DI' hapPCnina. rrom wae ao ttma. al any one or rr.-e ol lhc foUc,win .. CllJ OfaNor faib. 10 maM any r-,'llienl reqtlltftt by Iha Peed d Tn.ta °" Iha ~ whcft II a due:. (t,) GftlllllcW tall# to airnr,ly wllh any ol lhc ~ ,_ DI' c:ond~ al lhlia Deed ol Trust. lhc ~ or any ol dW :secunry Oncumcnmt (d G-has~ 6n °' ~ In fraud o, m;alftt;.J ~rm,don. dthff by IIC:l o, cmllilluln. In c:annec1'on wilh dm Deed nl Trwit or die ,.arci=mcnr • any WW. dlutn" die 11ppilaulor,i procesa or durina tho lerffl o( 1tua Deed r;A 1'Nsl or 1h,,: ~: or (.J) Gratllor IICIS f• c.iJs IO act in a way thal ach,-ly Nf'~ lhe aca,ricy Undr'r 1h11 Dttd ol TNM. ~ wtithnul limiaUJOn. 1hu followsna: U) Gran1 .. uamfflli 111k 1e• lhe Prupcny or actla lhe Pmperry W#huul lhe CPllenl ul Bcndkta,r. (ti) GNnrnr falb 10 rnatnlllln lbu lft,ulann: ~.n,d ID t.. c:arricd ~· Gr.anwr mn-nrdi"-ro the wnn:. nl dtb Deed n( TN!'&: CHO Gr.anll• t:ads 10 pa)' ;any ~ (WI I~ Prnpeffy: ti•> Gantur parnilS lhe 1U1f18 ol a ben alllldnM 1hC' Ptapeff)" tcniOf' 10 ma& held hy llio:ndldary: (.,) the dach nf <Jranwr (WI Iba~°'""_. man o,w Gr..ncor. lhe dnlh of the au. rcmtintn8 Gn.,uor who cx:a.U"cd the~): (vO dw ~•taken hy Clll.do:u.aw&ion OI' ~ ol eminenl domaV\: or (vii) tho ho6dn" nr hawftc:DIT rtl •"Y ~ or dcwd al uua COffrintl lhe PrDpimy UJrnnlClll.'1::5 ~..,. al alda --,Pat' or deed ........ ll. C f:m lf;in P.VO'lld Ocfaull .a-l)oc ... ~ 1111d bo:CI~ lk~ nay.11 Uop;k,n, ~ ~~m*rwdlu lcaa INn)o ea> day. ar.t..ance ncdCt: ol and upponu,\llty' ro CUftl! the P.vem d Dem.ill. ~ anv • ..xnc .... all of the followintl ~ la) Uerwfkiuy ,nay ~ I~ unpud PQfUIJII uf the ~ '° ti,,. ~-~ and po,-,.. ""*'-ft.NUM.T ~ -demand (each ol .. hid'I heffoy .,, ~,, ~ by Cnanil••). Whcteupnn &he Dea. llha1I ~ in'on1cdiMcty du,e :and payablir. ~ In dw A~ OI" 6n at-l'ico..,aricy 0o;vmc:nu IU lhe <XJflV9I)' ~ ~ f"\llthff dlal dw unpaid pora-, of the Dl=tw. ahall t.r -....dtrely •nd ~ due and Jm.,abR ......_... __,.. al any kind un lt. pan ol ~- (b) v6.,._.~'T'l"II:& ~ • .,Ids_........,. C'ftll7', ~ nr by la •aenta or·~ INolaraa ;apphr..1.a... mar. (I) n:q\MSI In Wrilfna thal Tn..-ot T__. .• ,.,,ad...ued apN lldl tJw Propcny. tn ~ wflh dX' l'">a,-..l of TIUSI AC1 o/ tha Stale of ,.._,.IC'O" has anwndittd), :.i public •UCl.iiofl ro dMt hi&!wa ~. and applJ the ~ nl such uAir aa pnwktiPd try ta .. ·• -""' pc-non. lnciudong Rc:nrdid,uy. m:ay hid and become lhc pun:h:Uer a, lhe nuaca'• .ale: flil 11pon .-le nldle l"rOpC1'y al• ~·:a :t:11lr, TNlllleirahl.U dcttwes'"wlhe ~al audl aleaUIUIOI''• da:d,. -.hlch ~ n-,ey IO the pun;-haNT at-\.,._ lfl dr Ptopeny which G .. ntof had or had 1tw: ~ 10 com,cy aa I.he-time ul di<' r.acaadnn •X ltris Deed ol Trua, :;an<J ......-h .. G....-.-,_,. h:H"e acquUftt then:atta. TIie INMeir"a ~ shall rccile the f..cu ahc)wjny Lhlll lhe saic: wu cnndua~ 1n CQcnpUann: wt&h aU the ~---ol law and ol 1.bY Diced ol Tnuil. wha:b rec-' .tlall be pnrna rac.w ..vidcno:e cl such c;ompla~ and conc-k,aivc eYtdencc thcteol ln laVOI' of bona J1dr purdmlera a,-1 ~ {1.-value, (li0 iab CICl'f9 LO p,o&ort and enforce JIii ~I~ whether by 9t:tion. ANI •• pnxieedtna in OdQIJily « al law fOI" Ille ~ perfonnancl!' of any nwcn1UIC, concUuon <W ~ In lhc' A..-meni o, In dual Deed ol 1'1\dl, or in •id o/ lhct e;xccu1io.t o/ anY ~ lwreln ivan1ed. or lo,, any f0tft1cwan-hereundc,, ~ for lhe cnfuccmcnr o/ any OClla appaep.uarc· lqlll or cqujlablu ,,nncdy or u1hc,.•·• u 8enrikiUy ,d\llll riKI: (iv) ~ 1,ny rau. pf'Ot""a. or odlar amnunl4 due Gn&NOr fflJffl any lc::aae, land c:onrntcf. « odtcr a~ by wNd, Gnimo, i,. ~ or dins any ~ In dw Pro,p,e.Ty. and esen."be Gf2nlor'• riatD and ralll!dlea under auch .,,,..,.._.....,.. ..... -~ .... ..,.._..... :J ~)· '. r: ..... ; ,. I°' i ~~--•, ... ·' ;_.,! - i. ' = ~ IO 11W maw perm,ned bf la..,. U..r-.'ldw, .tuaU ..._ no obllepuDQ 10 ma.b any dmla"'1 o, Inquiry aa IO lhe ll'IISNA: Of' ..n'ldency al 0..,. payment llei'Mftc1uy tecel¥l!s OI' CO pn,en:11 GI' fttl, • ..,. dalln Clf' take-..,. .......... _ to coUecr or ftllon:e dw poymen,c ol any .---8eneftrtu,, ID ftllJded co undn thla o-d ol T..- ('t') JIIIY' on oraneon betmll aU o, any pan ol 1M debl and obllpuonsr, &him 9ft'Ur9d t,r ;in, pnor ..-pp. eked n1 wu,,t cw Cllhcr lien. whelhlr .-,-ti-,. UII' lhcn due and payahle and whcchcT or.-~ 1.s 1hnl ti1 dcfaull undo:T ..,_ pna:r fflOll1G:IDe, deed ol uu:11 or llffl. Howe¥er. Bencfktaty wffl nor br ~ m do ... Any ,-ym,ma Renelldriry nmlleo 9hall bttome J:11111 ol dwr odil. and shall br S-111'-nn llsndkta,y'• fllmDnd. 1~ wid'I mi.-.. 1he -rale -fflC' Debi baaN from I~ IO timr. (wt) c:iblaln or upctae co.w.dliow: .. ror •• .-wane:.. ui• i..urtc. n, 11dcr ~ m.&uaM,g Lhl, Pmpcrly. Any - dW Bendkb,y spenm In doa'la ., will ~ pu, ul ltw DdM~ (¥1» ~ any ol G___.• ctabD and ~ undo •"l' Jc:... bnd CDftll'DCI. or odter ·~ by which G..-q. a-ana or ~ any lnlmcct ln IM Pn::ar-'ffY, lndud6na any opUon 1a pun:!.-dW ~,. .. cv -°" ~ ttw 1em, ol &h9 .__,, bind .--r.an. « ndlel' a....-nr. or to prepay in wtlDle or In fD11 11w lca9e. land caw1 o, otbn =a:cuem .. ~ wUI •-no ohllpllon 10 _.,.-,, auch ff#)l a. opuona ~ l~ Iha Deed cl nu.a in ony ult.er n-penniaed ~ the ta'" ul lhe sm. ol ., ............ lndudlna kwwcl u.., nl thill Deed ol Tnaa .. • ,.... .... (d o6~. Al any wna" hel'ore flt' llfwr the~ nl an Ktkan IO (QI'~ It. ~ nt Tnm. 8C'neftdl:,y lhAAI be endlled IO and may opply co die coun for 1M •pp,o6n&menl ol a ~ ol lM PnJpefly'. wtth,,ua ,-tee or 1M reqUkanmt ol band ,.,.,. and aU a.ch n,uak'e and bond bclna: henby aprnaly waned) ...a -Uhl.RM ,qpffl to tt. ~ OI' lnlal~ of CJn,wor M the daW' al appllallon for IIUC'h ~ ;and wtd.JUI nqpnl ID fflC' then vaJuo ol llw Prop:'IIJ'. Such ~ lhall haw power to colteft the ~pu. .-c.. '---and ptafiu of the l'lc,,pffl,.. tncludine durintl 11 .. pcndanl'y c,I NC"h fo..eclcZ.JW amon and. In CIN' ol a Aleo ;and a ddlt1cncy, durln(J the full anauu.,, p:rind al rcdenlpdan (j/ an,). whelt.w lhef,e, br ,edempllon or no1. .. -u u dunno any l\alhff lbm:a 01 -,,) •hen Gmnlor, cxa:pa ror 11w inlcrw:n&inn n1 -.:h ta:'ldnrr. walkl t. enddnf IO colMCf ...ch~ nmu,.. ...._ and pmin... .-1 .U ad-,--whkh _,.he~ 1W UICI' uaai In ..ti c:a.-fur 1t. poN:,Cdun. S I a1, cc:wlll'DI. fflllnaa,emenl and opmadon. nl the Propcdy. 5udl ~ ahaU ha-= .U nl at. rtshta and SW-pi:::rmialtd ~ the lsws al the SC:olc' olWulllnglon. 'ffll: readYltt tha,11 be oudMwbed 10 •ppty Ullii' ncl i~ 6n b hands in ps~ 1ft whole, twin pan of1 (a) die Debi or any Oldm OI' ~ ~ l!IC Uen o/ihis Deed o/Tnua. ur any tax. apedall -, ,c.-irw Olhcr lien which may be or become supniof IO the Oen ltnd -.'Wily k1ler'em hcft,o( or Ila lcn ft¥ -.di nnkr cw .....,_.., prc,iridcd .uch oppliaadan ls m.lc prior IO ~ saw. and (h) dMr defkicncy In aue of a rOft"ClcwNc ....._. .... ~-n.c, ~t.-~. tnctudift1I ~· ree. counser. reo. C0111S anc1 •!lffll"• con:k ,,;en lno.~ p.,nuanc to lhc powen bftcin cunuUICd ~ be accuNld herd,y. (d) ho oodC mamL The rtghts ancl ~ ol OC'nefkbry :a. piU"tded In the-sca,my ~ shaM hit ~,a, and -utd may be~~. suc.cwf•elr ~ IOfpilhff •~ 0...-or or 0. Pfuprfly'. or any ono of dlem. a1 the 9tlle dl:IC'feliOn of ucnefldary. and may he-~ aa ofwn aa oi.x;wun 1~or a.hal artse. all 10 ttw lll&ZmMUII --.. pennmed br appl6clblc la.,.. Nin and NRUlauon,, If ueneRdary electa to~ under OM' rtpl or remedy Undcn' lhb Deed olTna.sll o,r Ille A___.. Ocne6dary may 211 an,' lime ceal!' ~ undff .uctt .1ahl or ~Y ;and ptVCCCd under Ml)' other ,tam cw ~ under dm S>ccd ol Trua tw Iha ~-The failuto to~ any ....ch f1SN or rC'fflCdy' .thaJI ln no OYCIIC bo c:onsuuad -a _.._ br ~lessc &h,eKuf. Ncdrinsl In lM Ape'C'fflC'fll or lhB ~ of Tnut a.NU aff"eo:t OranlOI" .. obUpu,,ns IIO PIIV ttNr Debt and pennna b ot,Upuana ln ~ wtth tlMP ·-~- (c) No<" --~ Oll'P Flea N,ekh,n OllllllCW nor :lllY' Olhclr pe,-,, now OIi' hel'caflet' c:ihllfplccJ rrw thndF 1.-yrn,cN of an or any pon uL lhc D..tM .. t.ou he-.-.1........ed o1 a.ch ohl.,adon t,v '--' c11tw ~ by Bendlcmrv c:JC any ~ after iu eta.. date. or 1hc ratlurr of ~ tu comply wkh any raqua1 ot Gnu.-or any <KIMI' ,,._.,.. au ahUp&cd 11:1 IIIT&e JICIJDl1 re, ,~ on 1hi:a Deed ol Trus& or ~ mlf'orce-any p,ovts1ons al dds Dmd ol Trull .. the Ac;wwww.1i1l. -by rcalUfll of die nrlea.M, ~ r,f ccnaldcnadon. of 1111 OI' any pan. ol Iha .-ufkY held (or Debi. or by -. of any 98fC'ICfflCnt o, .upub1aion beC...m ... y suhlleqUc'III owner of the-Pl'OpeflJ" and ~ eziendirtfl Ow ,ane ol ,,-yrnet'II trir modifyln,: the ,erms of lhls Oc,rd o( TNSI OI' lhe Ajllftffleffl WitlKM,rt Rnll M¥insz chained the c:r,ment ol Gnnleit or such ndWr penam and ln 11W 1anff ~ G...ucM and au such othff PC'nlUIY •hall o,nttnuc m be 11111* '° make ptYfflCII' ~ io 1tw 1CflM ol any such estenM:NI or rnodlfk'Mlon a~. unlcw cxp,asly Nfr.ucd and ~ tn wrldng by Bendkbfy 1r, of Pc -In <W" Bcndkiaty ahall hawe p,oi:c,cdi!d 1n t!ftf~ any righl u.r.:la..,,. d 11M: SccurilY' Docum,mu, a.i .uctt ~ a.hall lia-hccn dua.m~ or abtndnncd for any ~ then In ~ such -=--. Gclanlar and Homefk;ary 11.h:;all lie ff'M-1 IO lht.rl, li''"'1CI' p!Mlio.-11nd d'°' riMflU,. n.-mcdk:s illnd ~ oJ ~· NlalJ conllnu. -If nn -.lril pl'OC.'C'Cdl"fP had hc.:n talit:n. 22. T~ In 11w C"·il:fll ol lhcr dnda. d.osaol\llkM'L lnc:'lllp.Kky. dlNabdny or tatpaUUn ol TNSlee. Dcndkwy ah.all appatn1 a1 wrfwtt1 a succcuor V\IIWG, and upon 1lw re«.nUn,; ol .. oc:h 11ppu,tnmwJM In atw ~ ol PW CauntF Auditor In tlw 1.,>unry In ...-h.ch 1M Pft,pcr1V b lo:iawd. 1h11' ~ uwccce shall t,e, .--.ed ,..,Ith all powen ut ,tw unRifta,I uuare . .Z.1 » == bpnu=::m. Th-vml """"'"'Y aU cwu.,. pa,11,lthu t'n.,p:fl)' IU dwpeninn cntilk=d ~unwnUCn~ rl twneftcia,r. nr upon lll:ldl6,;u;_.. ..,,-,1,c, o,,h1 -.I wril.c:n n:.i-:,,,1 f,w nxnrwq•an..:c flack: by 8encf1d.ry "' dw pc:nun ndbl ~ l.f. In dw C\"C:ftl at lhe takln,t hy cmlnent damaln ~ or thC' Wee ol any part or all of tJ,r ~ by :an,r flDmll. IIUCC'. n1unldpml « odW'r ~ aud¥wny or ·~· cheTeof'. aU aw:uda o, odlC1' t"QfnPC'nSIUOII for .uch 1.11dn,1 :th:all tic pa.a In Benef'k:lan· fOf appla,:a&ian on 1hv Debi. r,ruvkk,d ~• nu wc:h 11ppUca1kln ..tw1 -* In addlunul ~ nr ti.a,~ dw cff~ of C:WVIM any EYWIII of o.f;auJa or C'JClftldlnA lhC' llrne for rnaJunM any paysnrni ~ hneundff or undrr 1M A~ • .!1. Prior o-d,ofTruol. If 1hu 1,_,....I ,ti Tn&>U: """'1'fL'"I 111 a mew lnllft~p:' or ~"Cl nl uuat. lfw lien ol ""hich I& aupcriril' 1U 1hcr bt.-n ,~ tho, Dtoed 1,I TNIII. ~nan11w wR,ft"C$ to p:t,r C".1.-lt ift.'Wlllmo:nl of d-= Jr.U -."U-111')" 1he prirw ;nu1plltl' nr UCC'fl of tftllll when d III due-. •·twttwr by ~ik.n •• ,.,._._.. C.r.an11• wlM; :IIIP"5 1u y-ay and Jk"florm all nthcr nhlipti,1:-nf lhc moft...-,. RfflnlltW undrr 1ho.• Jwior ffll-.llPIC'" or ,lcrd ,,i 1n,~ C.ranU• a~ lu pr,:n,i,Jc Bl.-ncf"N.-.my ,_,..h prou( c,I pa)'ffleftl -J'IC'"fwnDllf"C UndcT 1h(o fwkv _.,!PNC' ur di.-1:..1 nl lnP-4 wfk-nc...,..,.,. Rrn,:f011.iauy R.'tfUC"'U> k. II Gr.anllil' r• 1n pity :any ~ nf ~ •• lturn,11 .,...,._.., ;I b di.IV ur .I (jn1nt1• talk lu p:a,r •• ,......,,..,,, :.any ,,.tw:,r ubll:tpdoin 11nda::r lhe f'"I• rnti.'IPIJC cw d,,cet.J of ,nu.. a.:ndkiar,• ..t,;all ha-1he ritthl. •-floll• tho• ,.:,n;P111on. 11~ pay UW "->dlnk"'"' •• "'• pay n,r ,-,,fnnn llUd, clffiC'j' uhUpUun cwa (.OnffllOr'a hdDW Any ,._..,_ """""'°"'""° .•p.-1il in J'C"l.nninlC Gr.anrow"a cihlitpliolll!l WIii •~-pan ;,I 1tw o.:tw. pay:thl,r hy Gr...-un lfcond'k'l:11')•".• ck:rand. :and w,II h, ... , inti........, .:11 1ho:-...:..1.11.• n.our..,. ,ho: fld• bc:an ftum ciml: tu :iffll.'. Drnd"tc.'Dty may~,· Ul"'On ;any wnn-nuctn" ,,I c.lri:llllc undr-r 1tw pn,• munPRC <JI' deed ut ~ 1hw ~ ~ rrwxn 1ho:I holder nl lhe prww ffWNIJPlfll: cJI' dred 1,I 1nm "'°" 1hriUW\ Gran1u, quc:Miona or ~ ltw -..c:na: . .-.JUn'll. or '1lllllnt ol Iha drfaull. GrantO." ahaD ... ft"l"WW. -1cnd nr rnndtfy 1he fl"W"' rnunpp or deed nl IIWII,. and ~II tw1t incw::uC' lhc debl aa.<ufed by th!, prtn,, ......-ae or drnl ,,11n1111. wi:tw-... llenL'f".,,......,,.,. 1wi.v •·rincn cnn,,rnl. 26. atll'ffWII at"am• acid c ,-nw ~ ~-cownara and~ • rorlh 1n tho s.wtt,, Uocumrms lfflaU IIOJ*""'II' the maklna ol 1hr )o;an and 1hr "'"rn,1 .. .,. .ano.l dofoli-,y o( lhc ApeC'm,rfll. uvJ ahall C'Ol'llinuc 1n full r- and dfrc;r; unul dw Pi:hl aha61 lia,"'l' ~ pa"-' in NU. J"' • ....,_. • Onnuwahall. upon mC' ~~al ~.CJlllll.w.. ~ ond de~ ..ch funhrr '"'"""-(i~ -.-w-.a ll,Nlak,n. a dr,da.r.11k111 cl no 1C1.-olll um do a,ch l'unha:r .a. u ,_). be-nccaury. cte.lnblr or fW'(.,.-r m ~ny DUI fNXe df«uqty dw ~ of the Sralrtry ooa.menu and IO Mablen IO IN' lleM ~ UI)" P'GPft'T ~ by ihr lftmS "-"°' 10 he c;:uve,cd ~ and any~ addidons. , t J: ... 1epb..:.euk1 .. a, bczow:-llwnllo. 211. n dlazu and Plllao, (jr.an1,w atv.11. :N c.no ....... ·,. **= n.,. and c:a,,,...-.c. c,._._ ~ Sr;,c:uNy Doawww and •U 5UpplemcnU, ll'lc-ne,.o. IN-.-hkh C'l'Wklrurtft,:, .... ..,,, ffllW l:a: gi,"C'ft :n fW01CC1 Drnrrtriaty. •• au linw9 IO be reccllded and fllod. Nxl ,e,,.feCOl'ded and ....ruec:I. in wch llllltllWI' and In MK"h pl,ic."CII -twncflcial'y ahall ffllMJflllbly raquc:a. and at.II poy .U &udl roc:ordina. OU. l'e'-l'C'Contan,l and ,...nuns ,_ and 01111..,. 1.harJlii:a. 29. a-l!apeDIIICD. Gr,uuu, Iha.II s»Y All appheablC' 1.VMa. rape-and fr!Cf' ...:t (onh ln 1hcl A..-rnnu •. .,. ' . . - ~-· ~-;~ " ·., , .. .,, .. · .. -~ ,I- .... '., ""' <&' li':I ! I Dll!lBD OIP TBUS'll' (condmoed) JO. Mo Cope r a., • 8Y llll;CCJldna "" we biQ. UY'dllnA requfflllll co be~ p.;,ba..ed "" fu&Nled, "" tu bcr ~ tg ~• purmult to thb DNd al Tfta, endllf:t:ng (lu not Hfflhd IO -, ofllit,o,'• ~. b:lbixe liheft, aaa:men, al p,cRs Aftd 11:=s Ci" mhcr ftnandaJ ~ .--,-or oppnaal), llend'lctary &hall no1 be deftned en bll¥11r lll'IUIQC'd or , p c.wd tha adllc:kncy, ......,, efl'ecclWIW o, 11:p& dlecl of dW w, Ci" ol any wna. prowWan o, con,;ti.Jon thl:ft,of, and adt -cu: r o, oppm,na& lhsnd' ahall nn1 he at conM!nae any warnam,-or :cp.c=c *"' wtlll .apea lhenllo-by llentfk:iary. Sl, c4Ac;:.. J!Acb and ewry lflffl. ocwnan1 and p,owWon ~ in &he~-. t,y ,,. ~. blico.pc:wuced a,., um Deed al Tnoa » Ir fultr -fcxth MftiR. ,Z. Nctdc:,a,. ilbcap fat any .-kie requft'd undff ..,.,uatble Inf' IO be gtftll In .nochff nonn,n, any nadce piorided (M in 1h19 Dnd cl Tnaa atlAll be 1s1 "'"1dn8 !Ind ahaU be dtlenacd p~ ~ ttuee O> m.,. aRct" depoA chefeal &n any matn « bnndl lJllilecl $Dia Pcllll Office. c:entned -lb.s dM,a Ul'dted Smln Mall. poc:&aai:-prqaid. lldd,eaed .. follows CM' :II Radl OUlff lldd,a,a u rmsy be I TJt wed bV fllJCkY aa. p.-owfd,r!d hadn: u .0 lhe Bencfldary: Kltla <;.ounsy Crcdil Unkln lt01 5econd A-. Suiec 100 5aaN', WuhinAl'Jft 98104-1~10 3' Cc Drmbzo "CP'llb cbo LaDIL All ~ ~ In dlill Dc:cd ol TNSJ uwl run ...Mb ti,-Land. "4. ll::ISld ~ All crl Iha .-o/ lhill Deed al Tnm aball apply IO and l'"c hinc:Un9 upon. and Inure 10 tM bmdlf d, Iha A m and ..... ol er.....-and llenefid::uy, a I .. ~. •nd :iiU pcnion:,. daanlna undn 0, duouah them:~ lh8I ~ In lhb ~ .... u t. t:ODlbUCd lO pnmtl • IIIUldff, con,c7MKC1 °'" ne,19 w1..:c& OlhCI' lhan as~~ br dlla Dold of Tnm. 5'. l:Ollldpb ~ Clculli.:W"• COWft:TnD and =~ hma.wlda shad be tolM, .-nJ and prtmafy. Any Cr:u>IIV -..·ho co- -rpD 1hla Daed •• TNCI bul does fMX ~ &he A.-,nenu (a) la ~ lhb Deed of TruA un&y lo nw"'JP~• sr.ant anJ ~ tha P,upeffy; (b) i!l no& ~ obllp&ed •o pay thlr Dcfx1 and (c> •....-thas ~ and an,. ,:ahn-G...-m,iy a.,_ 10 c:sacnd. moddy, rORbc:u or make ...,. ~ widl ,qpint ., die--ol thlll Deed u1 T,... °' 1he-Agreemem ...,,,_,, 1hal o ......... Coasnl. -'6. k u ? TIiey, 1ft c::a. any one or ma,,e ol lhr dlllpdanS or the ~ ol thill Dem ol T~ or ol ttw ~ :thaill be dnemur-1 co be b'Mllkl.. 1llepl ur uc--'"Dl'l:'Cllblo in any nispea. 1he vaUdlry ol 1hc ~ obUJptJons cw pn,riSion, nl lhtl Deed of TNsl shall be tn no -Y all'--1. Jl'ffjudiCOd at dlstuahed ~b,-. 37. Thia Deed ol Tnm may ftCII be m:anaicd,. -.MCd. dbdm,vad Of lcrrntnaled or.all,., bul ON,. hy an..--o, ~ in _.... •ISncd by die s-«Y llpuwl ~ .nr.-of UIII dllansle. waliwff. di.,charp-mo-termination is Ullffled. ,a. AppH 'r i-. 'f1IWi o-d o/ Trua ah:aU he JIO"ClftlCd by and oCUfUINCd ~ IO lhe la.s of the su.e ol 'll'"aNWIIIIOf'. 59. sertcc PWAw Any roitw. br Bencfk1MT to.,._~ aria pcdommnce by Gl'TI....,.. ol an,. of lhc ,nna and ~ ol ltu. Deed d TRIM CM' aay ol lhe Secudry OocunmnU nhaU nnl bit deemed ID be • -*'Tr of any ol 1he nrna nr ptVYWons ol diu Deed ol TRIM CM' any ol lhc Sccurtry Oor;,,ns,c,nu,, and Bnldktaty •hall have the riJ:ht ti-fin-m irw.l UJMMI •ria Pffl°"--. by Grant« al any and all ol .twm. 40. ~ TIM hadlnp and &he~ autd panSl'ffllph cn.Jdcnlenu, hcftaf an, i~ rcw con~ ol ~ff'nlC'e cint)•. and s.ball In no way altff OI" modify 1hr .-col ...ch pal'Tla,sph.S. SC'CdOnll and~ 41. ~ fl one o, IIIOl8 ridaS .,. aaacbcd '° and made • put ol dlis Df!ied of Trust. dw eov1mants and ·~ fw each IUdl ndcr 1'blU t. iuc:opc,.wwwd tnto and m:al.l amand and auppaemcn. lhe ~ and =~ ol .ho Deed ol TNll. IN ~ WHEREOP. Iha Onrww ... cacoaed du ~ lhc ~ and )'CU' na. abowr WT1l:len. STATE OP WASHINGTON COUNJY OIP l(p,gj DATED . -· .. ·-·-l:t- IJ;, I ' :: LE.GAL DESCR.JJ/'t'lON '1"HZ BAST KALP or THB HOR't'HWBST QtmJ\Tml OP TJm SOOTHEA&T QUJUlT'ER 01" SBc:Tl:OII' 14~ T'OMNSKl.R' 23 HORTB. RA.IIOZ 5 EAST. WlLLAMBTTB MEIUJl~. not K:DICI coaen-r. 11A&R%1'GTCN; EXCEPT THAT JIIORTXOH OP SAU> BAST KJU..r OP THE NOATHNE8T QUJl,JlT8R, OV' THE SOU'nlBAST Q~ 01' SA%1) SKCTXOH 1,t, DESCJlXBBD AS FOi.LONS 1 BBG.Dnl'IHO A.T TRB SOUTHEAST C:ORNSJl OF SAD) RAST IUU.P OP THB NORflllt'BST QUARTB'll 01" 'THB flOO"l'ltaAST QUA.RTBJl AS TillC PODIT or TRVB BBG%NH1:l1C 1 THBNCB NORTH 25•21,• .BAST S23. 99 .l"DT ALOHQ THB BAST L%NB OF SA%1> BUT HJU.,F OF THS N'ORrHW&Si QrmRTER OP TH8: SOUTMBAST Q'~TICR1 '1"HBNCB NORTH aa•o7•sa• WBST 1553.ti1 F2E't' TO nm WEST LDfB OF 4Al'.D SA.BT JDU.11' OF THE NOR"nl'NEST QUARTBR OP 'nlE SOtl"'l"H!tAST QUAJtTBR; THENCE SOUTH 0•27•os• NEST 525.82 l"£ZT TO THE SOU'nl LDIE OF SAXD KAST HALF OF THE HORTKWKSr QUARTBJl OP THE S0tm1ZAST QCUTBR.1 THENCE SOOTH eo•:1,7•35• EAST 853.86 FggT ALONG 'l'HB SOUTH LDf'B OF SAn) SAST RALF OP THB NOaTHNBST QUAR'fBJl OP THE SOtn"KBAST QUARffR TO TK8 'l"RUB pOllfl" OF BEOXNNDIG: A:tm EXCEPT COUNTY' ROADS. ·.¥i '"'.·· .: , I -, I I ·., ' .. • IJj N a; . RdlWTo: · · · · IHC MORTGAGE COHPAHY D9A COREllEST MORTGAGE COMPANY 5901 EAST F!M.£R AVENUE . TAHPA, FL 33617.·2362 Aaeaor'I Plnzl or Aa:DIIIII Namber. , 142305·9022•07 Abbn:vlll<d Lepl Docriplloo: · · SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NOR'Tll, RANGE 5 £AST llsludl ~ block w p111 at mon. locmslllp 1111 ruacl Fall lcga{<!o<rtptwn loc:al<d oa PIil• . . . ·.. . . . 4 lSP=(r, Abff4o 'Rm 1.111:1 l'ot Rlarlllaa D=:w!J cw 777161-:-· · .·· .. · ........... JVA.uozn /~ · · • · • DEED OF TRUST nl!S DEED OP TRUST ('Sccuril)' InaltUIIIOllt') lo m,dcc, July 18, 1997 RIIIEIT A. KIIR NIil CLYDIJIAE KIIR, teaANIJ AND WIFE ('eonv-"}. 'lbe111111CO la FIDELID HORTGAGE TRUSIEE SERVICE. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION • TIie gramor Is ("T1U11C01, 'Ille bm:Odary Is Jt'C IO!T6l6£ rJ/IPNff OIIA cmEl£ST tlJll1ll.\GE COl'ANY . wbkb Is ormlml anti c,lsltag Ulldcr Ille Im or FLORIDA ..... _ t. l°Gn1 C'.ACT · ct'IJI CD A\IC'IIIIJ:' TAMPA.· Fi:""3m1 ,2:iif'' "'-·-('Imler"). so""""....., L<adcr 111t prioclpal , aadwbase Dollan (U.S. S 122,000.00 ), aumof Ono Hundred 11,anty:r.., lbousand l 001100 WASHIXOTON-Slnglo Fornifyi,IWMMHI.MC UNli'CRr:1 IN9nM:IIN1' · '°"" *o t1ao <:11.Cl m, Cliiill,.aHIWAt19701) -IZ/113 :--'/) Pogo 1 al a lnhiml C:.. • IY/ VMP MOATOAGI FORMS • r800JBZM291 111mmmm1 ..... ~, .. :, -.. : ;, 1 'I lbla debt II l'lldenood by Bomlwe<'1 -~:Iha 11D1D dale,;.~ Securilyl'aluwui=l("Noto•), whlch · pl!Mda for mmlhly paylllCIIII, whh Iha l\lll ddn, . If DDI paid earlier, , duo ax! pay,1110 "" AIIIIUSI 01. ZOIZ . . . . • 'lblo 3o<:wilY ....,._,.....,.. 10 Laldcr: (a) Ibo "l'&ymcul or Ibo deb! evldmml by Ibo Note, with iDlomt, 1111d all .-ii,. Ollalliool ml modlllcadm,a or lhc Noto: . (b) Iha -of all Olher IWIII. with lnlffl:a. alvllllcod -poniar,pb 7 IO P""°" lh.o ,-!ty of 1h11 Seczlrily """-; mid(<) lflo ~ of,am-'1 ..,......., 11111 qn,aDOIIO 'aada 11111 s.cum, !ml,-ax! ~ .. N .... for d>il purpo..; IIGm,wcr Jrmacailly -111d CODVoyt 1G 'l'nulo; ID IIUI!, wltb ....-of ,ale; Ibo li>Dowfllg describtd propary lo..rm In . : . . . . . KOO . · · . . . · · . COO..,, Wmhlogtam TIIE NORnt IW.F Of TIIE J«R'l1j H.llF DF 11£ NIJllll/EST· ClllfflR Of l1IE JIIJITIMSf lllJMmt.OF TI£' SllUl1IEAST QIMTER OF SECTIOll 14, TlllSlSHIP ZJ lllllllt, .R/IIG£ S EAST. V.M., IN KIIIG QIOOY, lfASHJHGlllH;. · . . .. · .. EXCEJIT ntE.ll!ST'30 fEEI' CONl'EYEl 10 K[!lll CCUIIIY IN DeED IIECORIIED Ulall !!Nil CCUlllY RECDUll!IG NDi 1094243. . . .., ...... . ,'\~.-/ ' .. : . ·• .~. :., ........ ..... , ,{ I I ., 1--) I Blmk. Lcnd<r 111111 ,ppl7 lllo Fmida ID pq Ille exn,,. 11<ms. Lender --Doi ctu,p Bo,,,,_ for bold!D; ...i applrJng 111D Flllllll, .....Uy WlyzinC · Ille ....,,.., _., or verl!ytna ll\1> Escrow Item, Wllcu Lomler PIIYI Borrower lntaa\ oa Ille Fwxll and applicable law permll1 Lmder ID mob 1odt a clwp. Howc:v<r, Lender may "'IUini ecnawcr to pay a C111C-limo dmp form, iDdqJelldtm real CllalO lal rq,onlllg ..,.loo used by Lmdcr ID """"'"1ao wll!l lhll loan, WIim cppUcable 1..., pnl'llda Olberwlae. I/Dim m agn,cmmt II male or. app11a1b1e law n:quift,s llltaen to be paid. Ladculu1ll DOI be· requlfod to pay 8om1Mr lJZ'/ lmaal or com!op 011 lllo l'toldD. Bcmov,'Cl' lllld Leader may . ._ lo fflfdag. bowmr. 11w iu....,. lllall be paid en lllo l'uada .. l.elldcr lhall 111'• to Bomlwer, wltllOIII dwp, m 1111111111 o<:r:OIIIIIID& of Ille Flllldl, 111aw1ng c:mllta 11111 ddltll to lhe Foods 11111 lllo puq,osc for wbld, esb dd>k ID Ille Funds WU 1111:do. 1111 l'lmdl aniplodpd II al4Jllonal ICCllri,y for III mmo ICCIIRd by lhlo Secm!ly ""'1wlaL If Iha Pmldl bdd by I.coder ..-I Iha DIIIOUIIII pmmillod to be bcld by appllclble I...,, l.<llder olwl -10 lk>ml\vcr for Iha ....,. FuDdl lo za:a-l1lhb Ille ~ of oppllcablc law. If lhc -of Ille l'1mdl bold by Lcodcr • lllff limo la DOI oulflcleet to pay tho ex,..., IIUDI wbco due. L=dcr may ea oodly llomnnt In wrillllg. mid, lo ouch ""° Bomn,,:r ,ball pay ID Leodcr Iha """""" oo:asuy ID maim ., me dcllclm,cy. Bonowcr lhall mou up tho dclldm,cy Iii DD more llWI .-.-.hly paymmu, 11 Lcadcr'uelcdlsredoe. · · · · · . Upoa p.,_i In llill ofoll'awm sa:ured·by !bb Sccmlly lnllnlll1all, Lalder111oll p,ompdy rcrimd ID llorTov<r 11111' .Puod:r llcld by-Lemler. ·If. Ulldcr. pan,ppll 21, l.clldcr · dial! ,cquJto oro<II lbe Piopcny, Leader, pnar ID Iha e,qulaldae or·oaJe at WI PrapalJ,· lllall apply ,my l'wldl lldd by Lmder ,s Iha -of m:qulaltleo or me.a a orcdll qliml Ille IWIII -by 1h11 Secllrtty .......,.,., · 3. ApPllceUea of l"D,,...... Uolm eppUcablc lw pn,,,ldcs · otbawbc, Ill JIIYlllCDIJ r<cciYed by Leader mtdcr parqnj,!,i I IIOd 2 ....U be ,ppUcd: Ont, to my p-clwgcs duo mtdcr Ille No1c: o«ood, to -payable llllder pangnpll'2; Chlo!, ID lalma due; foonla, to prtndpal due; IIDd last, to any l01e cborga dlle Ulldor lhe Nole. 4, Cllargtsr U-llomlwer tball pay 511 mm, ......,...,., cbaqe1, fines 111d lmpm!tlo .. lllribulablo ID Ille Frapcny wblc:11 may 111111D prtodly over 1h11 SoQlrl,y -~ aod latdlold p,ymana or gn,lllld ·...,.; II ottf. BonoMr lball pay Lbcso a11u..,-ID Ille mam:r pmldcd ID pangnph 2, or If om pold lo 1h11 amomr, l!ocrDaor lhlll pay .lbcm on tlmo dlnctly ID Ille pcn011 cwod pa,mcnt. llonDwcr dllll promptly ftlmltlt ID L<ndcr oil ootlca of amDODII 10 be pald undcr lhla pvagnpb. If 8omm:r maku lllose Pl)'nlllD dlrocdy, BornMr 111Dll pnl1lll1llr l\mdSll to Leeder iecelplleridcodq Ille JIIIY10CIIII. Bomn,cr lball ptDllllllly dlsc:llargc ODY 11m wbJcb bas priority over lhlo Sec:arlty lnwulll<III unless Bonowa: (o) -ID wrltlog 10 lbc ~ or lllo ollllpllan -by Ille U.. In a -"'"'""'le ID Lnda; (b) -lo· aood 111111 Iha 11:n by, er dcfmda oplmt cafon:em,m of lhe 11m lo, lcpl ptDcccdlap wl1lda bi Ille lmlet'1 oplD1ce op....., IO JR""' Ille Cllfon:cmcm ol lhe lien: or (c) ICCURS from Ille bolder or lbc llcO'ID ag....-.. tarm:tory 10 I.coder •uboclll!tados Iha Ilea a, Chis Sccurily lmlNDIOIII. sr 1o1cr dctatDloa 111a1 my pan or 11111 PlopalY 1a lllll>Ject to a lleo wblch lllll' wlA priority over 11111 Soc:erlly .....,._, Lcodcr may gt,e Boaower • •Cllke ldcudfylng Ille Um. -oball lllllofy the Ilea orulla·eoe or maro oClho a:wm ICl lotlb aboYe wllhbl 10 daya at lhe JIIYIDB of naclcc. .S. Bozmd.,. Prap,rlJ i-Bofflffffl' sboll kcq, lbc lmpto,..,.... -a~llug er baolller c:rc=d oo Ille Plvpcny '-'"d ,galmi lea by Ora, lwmdl locludod wllhle die 1a111 'calaldod com,igo• 1111d 1111)' elhcr bDm'dr, lm:llldlog Oeocta-or Ooodlllg. fer which Lcodcr n,qwa IDlonlDce. lbla loslulDco shall be matm-lo 11111 _...,. aod ror lho pcrlodl lbtt Lemler roqaha. 111c ....,,_ cnntor J)IOYkllllg lbe lmmllll:o 1lull be -by 8omm<r IUbject IO l.cllder'1 ._ .. wblcb iball OD! be umasooal,ly wtdlhcld, I( Jlanowor fmla IO maJmalD -dcscribod above, Lader 1111)', II Lcodcr'I opdDII, Obmin CDVffllJID ID ptV1'CI Lcmler'I rigbll III die Plvpcny In -wltll Pll"'IJIIPb 7. AD......._ Policies sad --11a--co Leeder nnd lllall lncludo a IIAadanl -sac• cl...._ Lacdar l1lall boYO die rigbt ID bold lllo pollda ml -Ir i...icr ftlJldm. -IIWl pn,mp!IJ glw lo Lceder all -..a or p,ld pi,,mlmm aod .....,.. oodca. Ill Iha mot or Jou, Bomtwcr ebnll JII•• plDlllpl IICllce ID lho lttmnDce -er DDd Lemler. Leeder may owc pcoof of Joa ii nac made pn,mpdy by llomlwet. UDlcse Lmder 111d llomlwer Olllcn>lrc agr<e In wriUoa, imunDce pn,acdl sbaJl be applied 10 ..,.ol'llloa or RJJalr of Ibo Pn,penJ dm,god. 11 Iha --· or ,q,alr b """°wwly fwible end ~!J.,,,. ~9'"'. ll9\-eHIWAI t9'1DII .... 3oll ,. ·· .. ;-;:-,;;~ ... :.· :. .. .. ~ i • a g ;;! !!! •. Ill Cll ID "'4 ..,f ~ c:, r,. Q) ' Lender•, ,-i,y ii 001 luacm:d. 11 lho talOndoa or repair 11 !IOI """°nd<ally feulble or Lcoder'111fflrity -14 be ICSIClllld, lllc 1nsunDco proceccil llu,ll be '!IJ>llol lo Illa ,wm lealRd by 1h11 Security lllslllmlCIII, Wimber or 1IDI lllea due, whb mry cuess paid 10 Bormwtt. If Bommer lbandou lhc Properly, or doCI DOI mswer wldllo 30 dlfO a -Cram Lmlcr dm Illa -canter bu orrcrcd io IC!llc a claim, lhan Lcnderlll'l' coJlea llle.llllunm:l: pn,=11. L=dcr '"'l' ... w pn,oo,da lO n,,alr or ial010 lhe l'lOpc,I)' or 10 pay IIWIII i=nd by 1h11 Security ........,,.. wbcdlcr or !IOI Wit due, T1,e 3~ period wUJ bcglA -lllellOlkoilgi..... . . . . Ualm Lmler 111d llomnlia' owrwbe agim lll wrltlq, m,y awtJcllloo or proa,o1110 prildpol lball not wmd or-dus duo d>ul of die monlhly p.,,...u mc:rrod iota pnaraplla I ml 2 or dllllp, die -of tbe pny!llalll, Ir lllldor panpnpb 21 lhe. P!opalY ii "'l"ind by Lcodcr, Bomlwa'1 rlaJ,l lo ID)' buunmao pollc1co 11111 pn,a,cdD resulllDa rram damqe io Ille Pn,peny · prlor io dus ocqulsldml li!lil pas io Lcnder tolllaUIOII of dm awna ...wed by 1h11 Sa:urtly WU1IIIICIU immnlllldy priorlO llle-blllc,i; 6. OCl:Dpollq', Presom,Uoa, Malat-and -ol. Ille 1'1'Dpa1J; llon'o1ffr'o Loml AppllmllaJII Len r!cl!s -lllalroccupy, etLlblllll, llld"8 lhnl'mpelly OS Bomnffl'lprlm:lpal ..,...,.. whhlD amy· dqu nlla lhe "'"""""' of 1h11 Scarlty· loslrllmm1 aod lllalt.:commoo co occupy tho Pn,pi:ny II Bomwer'o prlndpll ia1"nl» ror 11 ,..., ... year nlla' dul d.u of oocap1111C7, WllcD l.cllllu olhcrwilo apa .. la wntlas, wlddl.OOQICIII tliall·°'" be uma,olllbly· •ilhllcld, or walcsa o,lCnll!llllg dmnn..._ Ollll wblcb me beyond llom>Wcr'• comiol. Bo-tbll1 OOI detin,y, da=p or Impair lh• ~. lltow Illa Propaty co-...,., ormmml, ,.,.,.on tbc Propcny. Bonvwculmll be lodeflUll ll 111y forfeloio, ecdan or pn,cooc1111g; wlr<dlet civll or cdinmll, ii llez,m <lmr ta Laldcr'1 good r.tl!l jod_,r could ""1111 1a flXfdllue. of die l'nlpen)' or Olln:rNbn marer1111y ._ir lhl 11m -by 1bit s..:urity """""""' ct IAdar'o oa:wtry tau:,at, so.-mq ..,. tud! 11 default 111d -. u pmldl:d In -b IS. by ....tng· lhe ...ion oi pi,,cmllng to be clllmislCd wllb o lllllq dun, Ill Lalder'1 p>d rallb cteramlmdoo, p,odudea fllr!dlure of Ibo Bommr'• -In lhe Propcny or otbcr mmcrtll lmpthmall of Illa Ilea ......S by lhb Scc:mtry ram,,mau ar Lau!er'1 IICalffl)' imaal. Banower alulll abo bo ladeCIUll 11 Borrower, d1111ag Ille lom, appll<lllloa pn,eas. gaw mcrlally l'allo or"""'""'"' lofanmdoa or_ lo Lender (orfallol lOprovido Lclldcrwilh any mau:rlll lnformalioo) ta-=iou wllh Illa loanmdax:cd by the NOie, loeladloll, bot DOI llmilcd io. _.,satklu COIICffllUl8 Bonv,,er', OCICll1JIIICY of Ille i'lqlcrty u o prlncipai =-. if lhls Secarlly tmu,m,a,t ii oo a ieadlold. Bonvwer sbaJ1 comply wilh Iii lh• pnmslont of Ibo,...._ If Bom>wcr oequl"" feo 1Jlle lO lhc Pn,pcny, lllo lauebol,I IDd Ibo re, tbJe lhail DOI merge ualm Lmler •ll"'S to Ibo mc,gcr III writlDg. 7. -of Lmder'o RlgblD la dN\ l'n,pal)', If Bo-!alls io ('Ctfona Iba CCM11111W UICI ._ cooamal ID 1h15 Sccmtty lallnlmall, or 111m 11 a lepl po,ceedlo& 1h11 -~gaJlkn,liy affa:t 1-ler'1rtabJ, in Ibo~ (IIICb uap, ding tabllllaUpu:y, pn.b,:te, formndcmnNIM orforfollun> or lO cnfon:cllnw orretpilllllom), thea Leodlr may do oadp,.y forw_il........, io P"""" Ille 'lliua of the Plope&ty IOd l.m&dm:'o rlpu lo Illa Pn>peny. L<mlcr'1 ilCllom G8lf tad&&d&o poylng my ,mm -...cl by o U.. whicb 11,s prlorlly cmr lhis Securi.Y imU&lma&l. oppc:iNI la ""111, paying ...-111 ,.,,_,• rcca aod cmcln1 oo lhe Pn,peny io -n,paln. Alilloagb Leader may 11b "'1oa llllllor lhll plllp&IPb 7, I.alder does ..C bm to 6o DO. Any ....-dllborxd by Lemler under lhls ponanpb 7 llmli -addltlonoi ddll or a.....,.. .... n:d by lhb Sccmity -· Ua!OII S0nvwer IOd Leader apoe ID otber &mila of~. lllc,e liDOllDll tblll bearlnifflll mna tbc dale or-at lhc Noro..,. mdliilll bo paydllc. wtlll lai....., upm& a«ico fmn& Lader ID llaml<7<r n:qualil1B plYiliCDL :. :.:=-a-p ·-::•' --.. ....--: ==;;.: ==== = : =::d!:!= c! ===: = =: -.n:d by lhb Scc:udly -· Bonawcr tlial1 pay lllc pnmilams r,qolild IO maimlil1 lho omnpge iol&&nacc la dlect. If, for mty .ama. Ibo DIDl11,P UilllllllCil mva,p r,qolild by Lemler 1-or ceues io be in dfeot, Banawcr sl&lil pay the pmniumS re<J11ind io oblaln c:.m:mgt mb111minll7 "l"ivllc&&t io Ille l111111pga -plfflOlllly In affn,t, 11 a CXISI IIWIIIIUlily Cll'llnicnl lO tbo COIi IO llommr of tbo mon-i&uun&nco pr.mawly la ,m.:,, from 1111 -mm&pgo lmuRr oppnrvol by Lcodcr. if mbn,mllily equiv,Je&11 OIOrtpgC losl&IIIICC COfflliP II COi available, ilomnn:r aholl pay 10 under eocl& e. . .o . m . ,.,. ""' 1fttlialil1-;;; lOtQ 11111G . , . . '';, . 1t~li ···-.-·~ :-;:-· • • • •• •' ~ .... , • •, ., ,1• .. ,,, ..... (: '"~:-i.:-.:, ... t .. ·~·/;'11!.-:..-,····.,·~~' •r•,!/Ji, . ·::~m:;•;,,-· 'l';.foo!1.~!.,.~.. --~·· ·,l;,;;·"~·~_;,·'!.,';(111~.~ .. "'•ft' • ''l'' •o "' '""•1,··,..!···~·1;•.-: ... ~ 11..-,,:;:l~~···;th• ... ,~111.-,,,,,,. )'M\• ,,,-., ,• ""IJ,,.~ '• ..... ;, .. ,:: '• • •O'I., ! •· ·, -, •, ..• , .. t:•,,."r:"r.·-~\.~, !•,•",•!'">',~ti.~,·, 1i•A,,;~,.;T...;,•r ... :,..i-,-:, ~·i .• n.••\•.~f,j.Y'~·~,,.•···~ },I~ \0 ~1~,. .·.•· ., ....... ~~ .~.,· •. ,, ·,:. ' I . , I ' .. I ' I I IDOIIIII • ,am <q111110 -dfth or die Jcar1Y monpge lmanmm praaliim being paid by llomlwer wh<II die -.,,_.1ap,cc1 or ceased 10 be Jn .cfl'<a, l.<Ddor will -·· uaa 11114 rcalD lhl:,e pll)'IIICIIU U • lou .-.e Ill lleo or monpgo ltuunmeo. Lou ......., PIIJJllellll mq tio long,r be Rqllllod. u tho option of Leodcr, ~ -gap iDl1lrllm:e -enae {In lho IIIIIOWll lllld ror Ibo period.Iha Leader requlla) pmldcd by OD !mum ,pp,avcd by l..cmlcr qaln bccamos avalbhlll llld II oblllllal. llommr tltall pay tho prcmiDms fflllDl'd 10 malmllin monpp lnsurllica ID c((COI, or ID pn,vlde o lo• ....,..., IIDlil tho rcqa1.....,. for mon--eoda ID --with any wrlam·~ bcnmn Bormm mid I.alder or appllcabla law. . . . . ,. lmpzdlaa. Lender or Ill agoa, may mab """""1>11 omries upo11 ood 1-tloas or lhe Pn>peny. Lader lllall she Bomwo: aotlce" tho 11mo or or prior ID "' bupccdon ,pcd(yllls iasomblc"""' !or Ibo impo;lloo • 10. Coad-n. no pn,mdS of 11y ,word or dllm ror damlga, di-or C01UCq11C1111al, m CGIIIICaloo with ID)' --ar citbcr utia& of l1J'f J!1U1 of die Plapaty, ar for-once Ill U.U of oondmmiafoo. 111 hmml7 llllipd 1111d lilail be paid 10 Leoder; · In tho ovcm of o loml L1l:illa or die Properly, WO pn=II ,hall be opplled ID lho 01011 """""1 by Ibis Secullly lns-wlH:rhcror 001 Ihm duo. wilb Ill)' ....,..paid ID Borrow.r •. la Ibo cvcm of o pwal Ulkla1 al Ibo Propeny lo. wlcll-lho ra1r mami vaiao of d.lo Pn>pmy lmmntlndr bet ... ibo takma 1s equal ID or gro,la' Iha tho """"""of Ibo -a-= by tbll SQrlty -immcdlmly be!on, Iha Uilo.g, uolm -lllld Leodcr"""'"'1ile ._ m wrt1Jua. !ho -.-..d by this Scl:url,y lnJUamcn1 wll be lafucod by w IUIIIIIIOI al 11111 prua:<dl nwlllpllcd by 1h11 followlag rnaloa: (a) tho IOIII .-.. ol lho sums leCUftd Jllllll<df&ly bd'om Ille IJtblg. dlvidod by (b) Ibo t'&fr martol vll,z or tho Pn,puly lmmedlllldy borolO die llldllg. Aay 11a1 .... 111a11 be paid io Borrowr:. In Ille nom or a pmtial llklDg ol tho l'n>pmy lo.. wbidi du, rllr mmla:l v:1lao or tho Propeny lnunedlaldJ bclOIO. lhc l!klo& II leu Ihm tho IIIDOUOl of tho sums .......S 1111111!,dlmly bcf.•re 1bo ultlllg, w,1,.. Bom,wcr ut4 I.alder lllilawo ._ 1n wrillng or uaJm oppllablo law Olherwl,c pzvYlda. tho pn,ccodl ihall be oppllod ID tho aima .......S by this 5ecurhy lnsuwam wbethcr or am du! ...., am Ihm doc. If Ille Pn,pet1J 11.-by &om,wcr, or If, allrrllOlice by LcmlcrlD Bom>wer llm ""'oondettmor o(fn 10 111U1 lO -or soall I claim for damagol, llonvWtr fDilA ID rapoud ID Lmdcr wbbJa 30 dlya aller Ibo d2U Iha -II glvoo. l.clldcr II -orlzal 10 collC<l ad applJ the plllCOOdl. ll 111 option. ,Idler to 1'0JIOrllloo or 1DPair of Iba "-'1 or ID tho 1111111 """"1 by 11111 Seourlly lm1r11o=l, wbetbcr or 1111 lhcnduo. • 1/DIOII Lclldcr 111111 11onawcr Oll!awlic qn:e bl writlq, 1111)' oppllclllloa ol rlllCCIClb ID priadpd llwl ao1 ealald or poapoae lhe duo clam or Ille m=idJ paymcn11..Ccrml 10 bl panpq,1111 am! 2 orclw,gc lhe · amoun&or...i.,-. . u. llamnnr Nat Rdm,ed; f'Drl>tm..,.. By Leader Not • wa1 .... l!llemloo of Ille l1nu! ror pormm or -aoall1111 ol amonlzst!on or die...., s:and by lhia Security ....,_,. gmmed bJ l.eodcr ID 11111' ..-ID bdeial of -..1111111 nm op:r,11 ID =-&1u1 liallUlty ol lhe ori&latl Do......, or llonvwff'a -II fa IDuiaL Leader lilsU nm be ....... ID ......,_ """""'"QII apiml 1111)' ,_ ID inlmsl at n,ft= ID ..iend llma r« paymcm « olhcrwlsa omdll)' IIIIOlllzl:lfoo or die ,urm s=IOd by 1h11 Secmitr lrull1lmCl1I bJ.....,, or.., domad...,.. by tho ortalnal eano-or Battower'• wa:eams ID "'"""'· Aar r-bJ Lemler lo. .....is1oa ;,y riahl or .....Sy tlmll ao1 be a WlliYor or or prcdudo lhc omciJe o1.,,, rigbt or mnodJ. t::. 'i4"v-+--; ::,;: ~ ~ :== .=;: _ • .,._ 1 '•~ r-. -'n:: ;-.-.....:= :=, ._.. of dlis Secarily lma,mlml alloll blod aad bcDefU tho ....,..,. aod usl11111 of l.eodcr sol aa-. llJb}td 10 lhe pnmolom Df panp,:pb 17. Somn>or'• ......,... qra,ma,11 Jlwl bajoia111d SOYffll. NJ'f llanoworWbo ... sl&m lbisS=ri'Y -baJdoas llGl-tba Nole: (a) bOIMlpmg this Sccerity lnMD!lllll oaJy ID IIIOllpp, gntn aod caovey lbs! llonol>u'1 imtroJI Ill die Pnlpeny _, tho tcnm or 1h11 Socurily 1nmaroc11: (bJ I, no, pcnonmJy oblt,llled to pay die .... .......s by lhls s«ur1,y ln,1111111011: 11d (o) apoes dlll Leodcr and 1111)' Olbcr l!ormwer may -10 estead, modify. lotbe>r or ~ • .o.m. f. ....... -~ -•1111011 Paao , ot a --;;;;; .... ,,.o ) ·:.r:.;:· .. ·. ~:./f· i. ,'j.":,·: :·:·· .. .. : . :::!~ .. ':;;;;{,:w,;,1c~,r.,,,,~,,--,.,..,:-~;:,s,¢1,,~ ' I ........ ; I·) I 001,WU.S j ' \ i ' ' ·I = = . BY SICJNINO BELOW, Dor.,_. -111d ...... IO lho ram, ml...,,._ colllAilxd ID 11111 S:curitJ, lmlrumcat md ID "'I r!dcli•l-by Bomnm and -wi1ll h. Willlmlcl: . _________ (Sa,I) -----------·(Seal) ·-__________ (Sell) ·-STATEOFWASHJNGTON COIIIIIJ' of 1W1G 0,, lhb day iicn,,,wly 'l'JlCORd bo(OIO mo RDBEllT A MAI! A11D CL'ml!RA£ HAIK ~~....,·Pt&!~· ~(}""'~""· :;;~;;..· ___ (Seal) . RGS!llT· A. HAIR • ...-., ..;_,,~(l .. 1 ... !;,i(~de.d", .... ,..11....Lmu..,,,"","~"'r....--(SCII) Q.YDEJIAE HAm ...,_, __________ (Sal) -______ .;._ ____ (Seal) -__________ (Seal) } ... ·- IO mo bo,,a IO IJo rile l!ldJyldual s descrllxd In 111d who-Ille wllilln and fmgofng imlnlmnzl, and -ledgal 111o1 t!IJ!Y dpllll lho....,. a, THEIR frat and .. 1.....,. a:t ad d1Ud,t'orlilamallld_...,11acma- OIVEII Wider my -llld offldd ICli llals ......... Z/8/98 @L .eHIWA! f97011 Pago 8 of 8 Form 3040 DIID 00..WAI .t··. . ! ! ! •: -~· \ I I • ' 1-) I \ ) LOAN NO. 311A•11028 BALLOON RIDER TIIIS BALLOON RIDEil ll imdo lhll 11tll day af ,JU!y, 1'97 , lllld Is mcorparmcd Imo md 111.U be "-al IO IIIIClld imd ,uppl..,,... lhc Morta,ao. O...S of Tnzst or Deal IO Seallo OdJI (lhc 'Socwily 11111n1mem•1 cf Ille....; dale gt= by Ille aadmlp,cd (!he 'Bonower"l to """"' Ille Borrwtr'1 Note ro me -amrr~ eo:t!PAll'I' mA. c:ci:Uffll8T UDR~D c:oa,ur (the 'Lender"') aflbc lAfflC d&!e md-l lbc p_,; ~bad ID Ibo Security lasuum,n1 u,I lac:au:d 11: UISOf 1SC'l'B AVBIIVII 88 =·'"' ·,sos, (Piop,nyAddraal 'Jbc lmemt racoaii.cd ca &be Noto b called lb •Notc Rile.• Tbed.Dlc of the Nole b caUcd ~;··Nole Date.• I u:adcntaDd tho Lccd,:t mq truuCet the Nocc. Secmtty IDauumtal GDd tb1s Rider. ne Leader or anyone who oam lllo Noie. die ScOllril) 1m1n1ma1111111 I.bl• Rider 1111n111fcr 111111 -Is emltlcd oo -. paymco11 Wider 11111 No<e ls called Lbo 'NOie Holder.' ADDfflONAL COVENANTS. ID oddltlca IO""'...,....,. md ._ ...... ill die Scan!oy lnstrumo111, -11111 Loodcr ftlnllcr _..11111,effll II fclloWl (dospilc im,tblllg lO lhc C01111111J COlllllllcd 111 die 5cc,uUy ............ erlheNOIO): I. CONDfflONSTOOfflON If I wam ID -.. .... ComlltlOIIOI Rdlmndas OplloD a mmurioy, ccram ooadlllam -be mc1 u of 111, Mllurlty Daso. nm --uo: m I mua 11111 be tllo owner ood occupm,t of lbe-.,t,jc<l 10 lhc Secari,Y lmumncnt (tllo 'l'lopcny'); (2) 1.-be CWTCCI la II/ff llllllllllly poymad> olld CIIIIIIOl lme been man: lbml 30 dlyo !me oa m, of Ille 12 sdlcdulcd DIOlllbly poymcllll -Y p.....U.g lhc Mo:lllrioy D111e: (3) no :.Hen aplnst lllo PlopcllJ (aoopl Rlr wa Cid ,pedal 111t11n011 am Y" duG 11111 J111Yl1111c) atllff lhlll lllat of die Secarioy 1as,rv...., 11111J also: (4) Ille Nert HOie RIie WOOi be mma lllaa 5 patelllll" polml 11,ow, Ille HOie Rile; 1111d CS) I IIIUll makD o wriaal ffil-lO Ille NOia Holder ns pmtdcd ID SOCllao 5 below. z. CAI.CtJLATIMG THE NEW NarB RATE Tba Now NO!e Rma WID baa Olal 1maaf-.a "!l"I IO lhc Fcda.1 Nollaml M---·· .~ ac1 yield far JO.)'llf Rud...,_.. 1UbjCC110 a 6Cklay IIIIDllmory dcll""Y ,.,_._. pl111 onc- half ol ODC pcrcemqc pollll (0.5"J, madcd lo lho-OIINlilolb ol GDO-polor (O.l:2"5) (1he 'New HOie Ru'). 'Ibo mpal1'd IICl yield 111.U be Ille applfalllo ncl ylcld Ill cfrc:<l oa Ille dllt ad llma ol day Iba Ille Note Hold<rn:ocha oatic,: ol a:, dcaloa lO .. crcllc Ille Condlllond Rclb1111dag Opdon. If lhls rcquln:d 11<1 ykld ls OOI aW1illllllc, Ille Nole Holdtr will dclcnnlnc lllc New Note Rile b)' asmg mmp>n1ble lnformallon. (!. fJ. m. ,~ ?,'I. MIILTtsrAlZ &\L&.OOH RID!A. Sklpl Family' DDS.WI r,rmJIA um .. . ,·_ ' .I J. C.u.ct11.ATING THE NEW PAYMENl" AMOllNT l'rovldodtboNow.NoioRotooscalculeaedlllSocllcnl.-l1ao1a-crlhaa,_potwa1>o,e Ibo N0111 Rao 11111 aD.ochcr COlldlUD01 _,...i In Sc<don 2-. me 111ilncd. Illa NOit Holder will ddamJDe Ilic......, or l)o IIIOlllbly P"Y"""' ow will be IUlllclenl IO 1q1a, In ftlll (a) Ibo unpaid priadpol, plaa (b) ICCIIIOII blll m,pmd Iii ....... plun (c) oil odler .-I wlD °"" 11111,rlbe NCDJ 111111 Scautly -.. l.bo Mamlly. Dcio (iWllllllq my IIIOllddy payma,11 r.bmae =-u r,qaiml Wider Sccdoa 2 llbove), owrtho -or Ille Now Nall m w, New.Noll a ... 1a cqwd Olll1llldy paJIIICIIII, TJ,e n:aull 0111111 c:alcalawm will be the _, ormy..,;pdnclpal 1111d i.....;.p.,,........, IIKlllblllllll.thoNcw ND1G ls l\lJ!ypald. 4. EURCISING TRE CONIJITIONAL .REl'INANCING Ol'llON 1hc Noto Holdcrwlll llDllty mo ti last 60 Cllcudatdays.la olY-of !ho Mlllmily o ... ...i advise mo of the pdadpol, """'cd bul ODpald IDlcre!I. dlld all Olhor ..... t mn apec,td IO -OD Ille_,, Daie. The Noll: Holder allo wlD cdvilo mo lhll I 1Jl111 emcbio tllo Cotldlttolllll "cllnnncl•s Op,loD II lh1 CIICldlllom In-. 2 -are mot. 'l1ln Nole Holdor wtll proriil= my pil)'mDlll lCO>Jd illlarmmion. toSClhor w!lh Ille ....., 11111 11111 addreu or Ille pa,m1 iqm,sooillla l)o NOii Holder lirll I nmst nodJ'y la ardor to'"""'" dlO Omdltlonr! RlllnanclDg Op1los.. U I moot rllc oondldona of Scclfon 2 abo,o, I --Iha Caodldoml Rdlmncillr Opdall by nodl)lq dm'Nnll llolifa' no --"'..tcndar da,I pdOI IO lbe Mnwril)' 0.... TIIII NOii Holda will ollcul"' lh• flied New Noto lla1o lmaal upoa 111• Fcdaal N"1onnl Man-Auocl,slon'1 appllc:alilo p,blbllal requlnd aet yield ID elrcot on llao dale and dam al day aodllclllon la rcoolYcd by Ibo Neto Holder 111d a Clllnwm In Scclloa 3 ....... I will Ihm-30 Clllondllrda,I IO pnMdo Ille NDIO Holder will! ~lo p!OOI or..,. Rlj1liRd owmnJ,lp, -am1 -Um1t11111, Bot°" lilo 114a1ur11y Dato 111c Note llolckr will cdYbe .. oribcacw lclaa1 """(Ibo Now Noto RIie), ..,,m=tbly _ IDIDUDl 11111 n =.11mo and pb:or: II whlcb 1-appear IO alp my don,_tn i<qUlml IO_.... Ille n,quhal idlnwlna, r - !lo Noee llaldcrwlllcllarge me offlO pn,casmg fee, dle-lSIIICWal llith updallq die Ihle 1na11ri1n= polloy, II "'f, lcd any lOAIOlllblc lhlnl,pul)' emu, -osd--=i>s, lnlmlgtMc In', llllfflY, -arccs,ae. DY SIGNING 81!!.0W, Bom,wcr IIIZCpll 11111 -to lile lallll a..,._.. OOll!llilicd la IIIII Bnll004 Rllfcr. MIIL'mTAD ILU.I.OON RIDER• Ap Pam:11 DDS-Dll . ' '1/Z.</ /'/7 ~. (Sip Original Ooly) P1112ol2 r~r :J~trtt 11t1~fi: I Jit1 ;,!H \~:(i $\,~; !, \;!r;i'-_ i~ if.,.';·.;: II ';;\~ii_· '.·l ;;$ti.,, ~·i·· ... ~ ! .. ~} ~--; .• ~ ':~ ~ 'ii~·.I. fr1? : ·-· ·::·.; i - Lolll Namb<t: 31/A· 1102S OWNER OCCUPANCY RIDER 11illridcrlllllldcdlbl8TH day of Jt,'LY, 1997 adll~laiollldslwlbe cleamd to ......S lllllaupplcmml a Deed olTNSl dacd al .-d&u: bl:nn,ilb, commg Iba pn,pcny clcscribcd ill=!Dm: lllE r:am1 IWf OF lllE IIIJl!H HALF OF 1IIE Hll!IIM'.ST WARTEJI OF 'IIIE NCR11WT IJWll6l OF Tl£ SQrt1IEAST QUNmR OF S(CTIOH 14, lMSltll' 23 NOIIIII, ANIG£ 5 EAST. li,H., 111 IUIC CIIUNlY, IIASllllll!Ot: £XC!PI' Tl£ IIEST JO FEEr CaNEYm 10 KIIG CCUll!Y IN IIEEII A£COIUJED lliD£R lt!IIG Clllll1Y R!mlll!IG HO. 1094243. llam>wem-dlll Ibis rider ii beiag glvca u-...... io L,odcr for anmlag Joan ID Bomn,,:r(I), oad for Iba purpose of Borrawel(1) llllllclog wllln oentllcatlom, ._.111111 repc,:sa,wloas to I.alder 1qanllag OQ.opmoc, of lbe abcMI-to pn,pcny. Banawcr(1) w.dc:1 , bis aad qrea 1h11 L,:adc(110la lodnrcmear ror gnanlng a Jom on the aubjca piopcny b bascd-1'1111 n:llmce upoll Iba followlag: 'lllo ftmds n:pi :fag :ha Joa pn,cocds.,. obula:d by Lcoder -"'" oflba lmn to Ibo F,dcnJ Homa Loan No"'"'° C<upxalioD ("FHLMC") a< Olla Fatml Nllloaal MOIIBIP Auoci1tlaa ("FNMA") or ~..:,a.11AVtiiiiii. FIIU,IC, FNMA llltd ltulinttfoalli , ........ icqultl. ... mndldoa to Plln:lwln& tllc loan WI, IIIIIOOII albcr :hhtg,, Iba Bo1t'111ffl(1) OCCOIP)' 1111 sal>ject p:vpeny u 111 y,:ar-lllWIII primmy restdcacc. Bolt'lllffl(o) bfflla ccnllla ...icr pcaDltJ of perjal)' 111 .. flonowa(1) llm:la llullf occupy lllo sub)ffl pn,peny m 111 ycar-tolltld prlllllllY n:sidlmce. 0Dd lh11 tho-by llonowa(1) wll oc:cur noc fa:or than tlllny (30) dayullcr !lmdlag of this fo1D. llomlwa(o) Wldcniuds lbot foflwe lo comply with lbb provision ,ball comtl ... a dcflllll umlct Iba tm!II or the Deal orTN11 to wblcb this ridtt ls macbcd, and siLIU immcdltldy giYC rue 10 Lender's ccfon::c:mcm ol 111 riglm 1llldcr tho fanxlosum IIOd pow,, ol Illa proYil!oas Olldff Aid Do:d olTnm. We aadmtlad and 1poo llw IIOIII dmo 10 dmc iii, l.<lldor -RqUln:, IDd llomlwer(s) allaJJ l\uulSII, docwlnWloa or prool a=plabfe to l.clldcr o! our c:omlao:d -'l' ollllo 111bjee1 PIIJ()ffll'. e._.f).111. f.ft,?ff. ,r; .... :- :,:-:!,:: ... ·.··.• ~ :: . / .!'·· • 6 .,. ;:.;/,· '•,\ SUie olllASHINGillH KING COUiey ss. 0n __ 11_z_4t_,_1 _______ be,foro mc. lbcWldenlpd. • Noco,y Pul>llo In and for ..id S1J1e. penoaally~pemd~~~---~-,-,--~~~~~~~~~~~~- RO&m A IIAIB. Allll CLYl>EIIAE IIAIR -10 mo IO be Iha peno11(1) wbose 11111111(1) _ _., ... ,.__ ___ IUbsr:rlbed 10 Iha fo,qoilla lmtrumm ...i aclnowicdgc llla1 Tll!Y uecwd Ibo-. WITNESS n,y band 1111d om.tu ial: P1112or2 ,·' . ::;· =.:~· ~If .. -~ ....... ~~J .. ;.;E>.:·:~~~s\~%t~~.!.~~-~i~:~1;·'.~}:..f:::.:.:~;~~~;:~r~~~:-~~~r,~;:r~~~!¥~!tr~t~-~.e~~~-~:::~ .. :~;,j~NJ:,;1:i;1f::f.:/~~~:~~:~~~-~f~. Whittaker, Bruce From: Casey, Laura Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 1 :46 PM Whittaker, Bruce To: Cc: Scharer, Karen Subject: RE: Addendum Wetland Report for Evendell {L01 P0016) Hello Bruce: I reviewed the drainage information from the upstream plat file L02P0011. Improvements to the downstream drainage system through upsizing culverts will have to be reviewed to ensure that no wetlands are being drained or flooded as a result, no streams placed in pipes, or no streams damaged by increased flows downstream from replaced culverts. Upsizing culverts io a sensitive area requires a clearing and grading permit. Laura Casey -----Original Message----- From: Whittaker, Bruce Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 9:39 AM To: casey, Laura Cc: SCharer, Karen Subject: RE: Addendum Wetland Report for Evendell (L01P0016) Laura, I have recently received copies of several drainage complaints and claims downstream from this development that were not previously released. The claims do appear to be severe(type 3) floodling problems, involving finished basement flooding. To make a long story short, I am considering conditioning the plat through SEPA to improve all the culverts south along 160th Ave SE and easterly to the unamed tributary at the unopened R/W for 162nd Ave SE. I have spoken to Mike Romano and both he and Ed McCarthy seem to agree with this approach, rather than simply overdetaining with Level 3 Flow Control. Would there be permitting problems with upsizing these downstream culverts from your perspective? Note that WLRD recently upgraded one of the culverts at 16046-SE 142nd St.through the Neighborhood Drainage Assistance Program. Thanks, Bruce Whittaker -----Original Message----- From: casey, Laura Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 12:27 PM To: Scharer, Karen Cc: Whittaker, Bruce Subject: Addendum Wetland Report for Evendell {L01P0016) Hi Karen: I have reviewed the Addendum to the Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report (etc) dated 10/28/02, for the 70- lot alternative to the plat of Evendell. Buffer averaging is no longer part of the proposal. Road improvements will cause filling of 200 sf wetland, with 400 sf of mitigation proposed. Road improvements will impact 6,989 sf of wetland buffer. An additional 15,495 sf of buffer is proposed in the NE corner of site. This information is acceptable for preliminary plat review. Please let me know if you have any questions. Laura Casey Environmental Scientist 111 / Ecologist Critical Areas Section 1 .; . . Whittaker, Bruce From: Casey, Laura Sent: To: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 12:27 PM Scharer, Karen Cc: Whittaker, Bruce Subject: Addendum Wetland Report for Evendell (L01P0016) Hi Karen: I have reviewed the Addendum to the Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report (etc) dated 10/28/02, for the 70-lot alternative to the plat of Evendell. Buffer averaging is no longer part of the proposal. Road improvements will cause filling of 200 sf wetland, with 400 sf of mitigation proposed. Road improvements will impact 6,989 sf of wetland buffer. An . additional 15,495 sf of buffer is proposed in the NE corner of site. This information is acceptable for preliminary plat review. ~Please let me know if you have any questions. Laura Casey Environmental Scientist 111 / Ecologist Critical Areas Section King County Dept. of Development & Environmental Services (206) 296-7291 1 -®--! ... :" 71:fro.p·;ott<t uso:oNLY ling County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 TTY (206) 296-7217 • ': ,:': .. '.:Cover·s11eet. e'~, -~ • . ·~ ' . • .J.. . • . • ,y, ···-, . ' Alternative formats available upon request Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division "'**"'***********************" IMPORTANT **"'****"'********************* PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY FOR ALL DROP-OFFS ProjectNo.: Lo/Ptllll& Project Name: pr/E3y0£ll- UNTf,1/UIJij' OL.V. 5' vc .s FROM: .f!d!rctc.-~/Vf-./v Company Name&' Contact Person Telephone No.: _o-) ./fl~ -z '5(,,.s' ~Oy~D,DUitTY LAND USE SERVICES ' TO: £fl te'LN 5;:c:ho,e!C>'C 1, yo O 1. G ADDITIONAL ORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please print) Short Pia / Plats Please spec1 em(s) dropped-off: , / , Cci,e.,, u tl&c ,: 6 L4:;d'h . I ,f/(.7,:J,0v,Ol/'--1 d/L'Tl/:l,..//)/ /.,v'/COL//~,£.- Lot Line Adjustment Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Right of Way Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Clearing/ Grading Permit Additional information requested; please specify item(s) dropped-off: Other:------------------------------------- PLEASE NOTE: All drop-off item(s) will be logged into the computer under the project number, therefore, it is important that the top portion of this form is completed properly before you drop-off anything. Assistance in finding a project number can be provided by speaking to a Land Use Services Division Person of the Day (POD) or the Zoning/Land Use Technician. Your cooperation is important. Thank you. LUSD Drop-Off Cover Sheet lg-cvs-dropoff.pdf 05-30-2002 I' 22617-S'h Dr. SE Bothell. WA 98021 Karen Scharer, Planner II CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 30, 2002 LO I PO O 16 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 (425) 486-2563 OFF (425) 486-3273 FAX RE: 3rd Request for Information -Rezone and Plat of EVENDELL Application Numbers: L01TY401 & L01P0016 Dear Karen: On behalf of our client, U.S. Land Development Associates, please find the following in response to the referenced Request for Information: o 8 copies of a letter report titled ADDENDUM to the Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation, and Conceptual Wetland Mitigation Plan for the Evendell Project Site prepared by Habitat Technologies, dated October 28, 2002. In addition, please also find enclosed 8 copies of an e-correspondence from Ed McCarthy with Haozous Engineers in response to a request made by Bruce Whitacre of KCDDES to evaluate newly released downstream drainage complaint information. Please note that 8 copies of a revised SEPA Checklist dated 10/9/02 indicating the possibility that 10" or 12" sewer main may be required to be constructed along the frontage,of the property along SE 136'" Street to provide sewer service to the project was submitted to you previously. I. RESPONSE TO OCTOBER 8, 2002 NOTICE OF REQUEST ODES COMIIIIENT· Wet/and/Wildlife Study: You may wish to update your wildlife study to address needed mitigation. RESPONSE: Attached please find 8 copies of the requested addendum to the original study. The addendum revises proposed mitigation to ,eflect impacts associated with the latest revised 70-lot plat. The revision eliminates the proposal to reduce the width of the wetland buffer along the western edge of the wetiand. "lei us take the load " / Karen Scharer October 30, 2002 Page 2 of 2 ) In addition, the addendum specifies compensation for road impacts to the wetland and wetland buffer that will be created by construction of road improvements within SE 136'" Street existing and proposed right of way as well as County required road improvements along the project frontage on 160'" Ave. SE. Please call me at (425) 486-2563 if you have any questions regarding the material submitted via this transmittal. It is our understanding that this submittal will provide Staff with sufficient information to proceed to a SEPA Determination and establishment of a hearing date. Accordingly we would like to request that the process be forwarded as rapidly as possible. Thank you. Enclosures CC: U.S. Land Attn: Howard Stansbury Sincerely, CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES rpe __ Michael J. Romano Land Consultant "Let us take the load. " ,. Oc~ 30 02 02: 19p Habitat Technolo~ies October 26, 2002 Centurion De-.-elopment Services 22617 -Bu, Drive SE Bothell, W8shington 98021 2538411942 RE: ADDENDUM to .the Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation, and Conceptual 'l/\letland Mitigation Plan for the Evendell Project Site Dear Mr. Romano, ,! ' w Subsequent to the preparation of the "Wetland Evalualion and DeHneatkn Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation. and Conceptual Wetland Mitigation Pfarr' for the Evendell Project Site, (Habitat Technologies, May 2001) the Selected Action Plan has been modified. This addendum desaibes the cnengas from the original report. The Evendell Project Site is approximately 14 acres in total size and is located 6liiSt of the City of Renton, King County, W&shington. Onsite assessment of the proj8ct site following the procedures outlined. in the Washington State ~ ldentmcation and Delineation Manual (Wash. Manual} and the Corps of Engineers lltl!etlands Delineation Manual (1987 Manual} results~ in the identification of one area (Wetland A) that 8Jlhibil8d hydric soils, wetland hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation consistent with the established criteria of both the Wash. and 1987 Manuals. The preliminary Selected Action Plan of the Evendell project site included the creation of indapend8nt lots suitable for the deYelopment of single-family homesites consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan. Buffer averaging was to be used along the western boundary of the onsite wetland as a part of this lot creatiOn. The Selected Action Plan of the Evendell project site focuses on the creation of indapeudent lots suitable for the del/elopment of singt&.family homesites consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan (Attachment 1 - Preliminary Plat). An essential element of this process is the development of access roadways and utility conidors that meet both King County health and safety standards and the goal of avoida11ce and minimization of potanlial short- term or long-term advefse impacts to aquatic environments. ~' st:roc2VIO, ~' wi! WL -1wlll a r ae r a aod pee::: 3 : a a a I th ns P.O. SoJr: 1088, ~Hup, 1¥ sh" put 98371 vooco 2S3 84S 5119 ~Report~=U~ p. 1 OC't. 30 02 02: 1 Sp Habitat Technologies 253B4l1S42 A primary feature in the creetion of these homesite lots wiU be the establist.ment of a protective bUffer adjacent to the ida llified onsite wetland consistent with King County Sensitive Area codes. The creation of these homasite lots will not require placament of fill within identified wetland areas or reduction of the st& .dm d buffer width as previously proposed. Site development requires construction of road improvements within existing unopened SE 136111 Street right-of-way along the no.II.em projacl boundary. This will require the unavoidab!e filling or the l'lOf1hem 200 square feet of Wetland A and reduction of the MSocisted buffer by 4,649 square feet. tn addition, in response to King County staff concerns, the applicant has proposed constructing road frontage impro\18ffl81lts along 1 sdh Avenue SE consisting of a paved shoulder and relocation or the drainage ditch. This wiH require the unavoid9ble intrusion into 2,340 square feet of the bufMr for Wetland A. As mitigation for the unavoidable toss of watland and buffer essociated with required road improwments, the wettand_buffer will be inaeased by the adclition of 15,495 Squ£l'8 feet of forested_area located in the northeast comer of the site between .the eastern boundary of the \ll8tland and 160111 Ave. SE. Provision of this adaioo.,at buffer fully compensates for tha unavoidable intrusions into the wetland and standard buffer areas and will not adversely impact the remaining wstland .area. Ff azsos OF THE BUffER ADDfTIOill AND wen.AND RESTORATIOl\l PUN 1. The buffers associated with the identified onsite wetland will be established to the King County standard SO-foot width. Identified onsite wetland and associated buffers wiU DQl be adversely impacted by fubJre onsile land uses. 2. As a part of the development of the required roadway impro~ the adUal encroachment into buffer area of Waland A will be held to the minimum neceSS2fY to meet COIJl'lty row11ay requirements. Following placement of the roadway improvements the roadway side sk>pes within the buffer areas will be revegatated by seeding with an appropriate seed mixture. 3. As compensation for · unavoidable enaoachment into the north end of Wetland A, 400 square feet (a 2 to 1 ratio) of deglaoed wetland in the proximity of the edge of the roadbed will be en'-1ced through the planting of native treas and shrubs. This restoration will enhance wetland function by providing structural diversity in the plant community. 4. As compsnsation for unavoidable encioachrnent into the north end of the buffer associated with Wet1a, Kl A and a portion of the buffer on the east side or Wetland A the standard buffer will be inc a sad to encompass the entire · northeast comer of the property. This buffer width increase will enhance Evendell-2 00062 WGllsnd/Wildlife Report ADDENDUM p.2 ' ·• Oct. 30 02 02: 19p Hab~ ··at Technologies 253r·11942 weUand function relative to that provided by stalda,d buff8rs through ina eased visual and auditory blockage from 160"' Ave. SE and Qi Bier conservation of wildlife habitat opportunities. 5. In order to protect the wstiand and associated buffer erosion control Best IVJanagement Practices will be implemanted during all phases of construction. These measures include silt fencing along the buffer prior to any onsite actions. In addition, all ~&ad areas will be seeded with low 91owing grasses upon the completion of onsite actions. 8. AH activities related to the aswblishment of the buffer areas will be monitored by the project biologist. WIETUNO RESTORATION AND SUFFER ENLAPCER ENT PLAN g Tha GOAL of the idet ,titled buffer addition plan is to ensure that proposed site deYelopment actions (i.e. the upgtadi,ig of an existing right-of-way roed¥1&y to meet King County health and saf8ty 5*andards) do not aeme a short-tam, or long-term adverse impact to the onsite wettalds or associaed buffef' areas. The total amount of King County jurisdictional 'I. atlar!d area to be unavoidably modified by this project equals 200 ~ fiNt. As compensation for this unavoidable impact to \Netland A, 480 S4iJ"ern 6laat (a 2:1 ratio) of remaining degraded wetland will be restored through the planting of native treas and shrubs. The total amount of King County jurisdictional buffer area to be unavoidably modified by this project equals 6,986 squan, feet. As compensatian for this unavaidable impact to Wetland A, 15,496 s • n,e feet (a 2.2:1 ratio) of area at the northeastern corner of the pro;ect will be dedicated to buffer area. The~ of the ~ Restaralion Plan is two fold. Fnt, to define the wetland resto.atio,, plan proposed as an element of the construction of the Evendell ~t. Second, to identify the objectives and criteria wheleby the success of the completed wetland and buffer restoration plan will be detennined. E-1-3 00082 vvc:t::ndfv~ Report AODENOUM p.3 -~ •. Oct 30 02 02: 20p Hab•tat Technologies 25:'~411942 To achieYe the identified GOAL, the following OBJECTIVES are defined: A. The restoled wetland will 8llhibit scrub/shrub and sapling vegetation classes wi1hin three yea-s following initial planting. B. The restored wetland will utilize native trees and shrubs which provide additional habitats for wildlife. This wetland area will provide nesting and cover habitat for paaeerine birds common to the area within three years. , EU ORHANC'E CRITERIA To es8ablish whether the defined project 08JECTIVES have been met by the watland restoration plan, the following PEIFCMUIANCE CkiliZRtA have been ·estalxishad to apply to the restored wstland area. Otj ctiva A. The restoled wetland will exhibit scrub/shrub and sapling vegetation <:lesses within threa )'413111 following initial planting. Pa.formance Criteria; As dsfinsd by specific plant counts 100% of the trees and stvubS initially planted will be alive at the end of the first growing season. Pwfcmlance Criteria; As defined by specific plant. counts 80% of the trees and shrubs initially planted (cumulative count) will be alive at the end of the third growing season. 01 j l!i...a B. The restored waland will utilize native treas and shrubs which provide additional habitats for wildlife. This area will provide nesting and cover habitat for passerine birds common to the area within three years. Pafu.n.aup Crilaria: Use by passerine birds will be documsnted through observations and photographs of individual birds and dirsct habitat utilization. The plant species seleeted for plenling in the wetland and buffer areas will be obtainsd as nursery stock. The specific regional nursery will vaJy according to plant spades and nursery availability. The seleded species are native and Evendell -4 00062 Wstlond/Wi!dlife RBl)Olt ADDENDUM I". 4 .... Oc.t 30 02 02: 20p Har >at Technologies 25~ '11942 commonly occur in the local area. The plant species p,9llaibad were seledad to increase plant diversity, match piese, ,t onsite communities, and ino a ase wildlife f'la.tt,itas. The plant locatiOnS will be nine feet on centei for the trees and six feet on center for shrubs and will be adjullted in the field at tha time of planting to ensure plant survival and to protect retained native species. QUAHT1T cosvsr:w MME PROPOSE> INDICATOR y SCElfflFIC NA!lllE SIZE STATUS 4 Western rad cedar (THP) 6-811 FAC ThuiB .. 6 vvauam aal>aj ,~e (PYFJ 4-611 FACW Pwusfusca 8 Paafic. ninebark (PHC) 2 gal FAOt/V· .. _ ' 8 Red osier dogwood (COS) 2gal FACW- Ccmus sto/onifem 8 Sitka willow (SAS) 2 gal FACW SaHx sitch8nsis 1\/!aintenanc:e of the restored W8tland and buffer plant communities may be required to assure the lonQ-lerm health and welfale of the wettand's environmental functions. However, this area is so small as to make maintenance and monitoring unwasranted. In lieu of marute11anoe and monitoring, the 400 square foot area will be planted at doul:lle tha normal planting dsnsity for trees and shrubs. This will provide for mortality of the planted vegstation while still meeting planting density objectives. Temporary irrigation will be established within the restored wetland area to ensure one-inch of wals!" from June through September of the first year following installation of the plantiogs. Financial guarantee will be definad using the standard King County Sensitive Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet. King County will hold these guarantees. Should you have questions or comments regarding this addendum, please co, itact ma. Mark Heckert Senior Watland Ecologist f'. 5 •· Jesse Tanner, Mayor January 20, 2003 Karen Scharer, Program Manager DOES -Land Use Services Division Attn: Permit Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 ' f;~ <CIT~IF JRJENTON Cb-6 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: L01P0016 & L01TY401, EVENDELL SUBDMSION AND REZONE Dear Ms. Scharer, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the rezone and formal plat for the referenced development. I recognize that this letter is coming to you past the published due date for the comments. However, we would still request to put the attached comments into the record: I. Utilities: Water District #90 will provide water. The City of Renton will provide sewer. A sewer availability certificate has been issued. An amendment to the sewer availability certificate will allow the parcel to the south to be included (in progress). 2. Transportation: The proposed development is within Renton's Potential Annexation area, therefore we request that: ~ Right-of-way dedication along SE l 36'h Street abutting the development site conforms with City of Renton standards (i.e. a minimum of 20-feet of pavement). Also, right-of- way dedication for the internal street system shall meet the City of Renton standards. ~ Street improvements (roadway, pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, street lighting, etc.) are required for the portion of the site abutting SE 1361h Street and abutting 160th Ave. SE. ~ The required street improvements along SE 1361h Street, 160th Avenue SE and the internal street system shall be installed in accordance with City of Renton standards. Thank you. Sincerely, \... o'!l:ttl:!!i~ RECEIVED Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. z \ J~N 2 2 7-003 cc: Lys Hornsby Sandra Meyer Jennifer Henning MAIN FILE COPY Exhibit No '.---'\--~\_.S:, \\'"'-\ ·<-1 t> 1 Item No .. l..,~ .. PSl~l.l\11.lp.p~-= ' 1,-ls, -Cl~ Rece11,e1J ·---··--·-·-·.::::=--- King co.0 n,y hearing Examiner 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 @ This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE i • DATE: TO: CC: FROM: SUBJECT: • • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM December 27, 2002 Jim Gray/Fire Department Lys Hornsby/Utility Systems V/ Sandra Meyer/Transportation V Lesley Betlach/Parks Director Gregg Zimmerman; P/B/PW Administrator Jennifer Henning; Development Planning;Pfvt'T f1 King County DDES Notice of Decision File#: L01P0016 & L01TY401/Evendell Subdivision & Rezone Attached is a copy of the above subject notice. Comments must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) by January 16, 2003. Please refer to the attaclunent for complete details. Please submit all comments to Gregg Zimmerman, allowing sufficient response time. RECE\\/EO JM~ 2, 2, 1.003 ~"'~ (-, .·@·~ ·. [--~:~o" , . ~ . l)l~~b-_) \\ t\\\\'l ~tt. 'l . Notice \___) Department of Deve!opmenl and Environmentll Services . . , ~\~~'O Laud Use Servicu Division ~Cl-\ 900 Oak~ale Avenue S0u1hwes1 ~i,.: (Remon, Washingron 980S5-1Z!9 of Decision ( File No.: · Project Name: DDES Planner: Telephone No.: Applicant: Project Location: Project Descripdon: Permits Requested: L01P0016 & LOITY 401 Evendell Subdivision and Rezone Karen Scharer, Program/Project Manager II 206-296-7114 Howard Stansbury U.S. Land Development Associates c/o Michael J, Romano, Centurian Development Services 22617 .-s• Drive SE Bothell, WA 98021 425-486-2563 Lying south of SE 136" Street and between 156" Ave SE and 160" Ave SE. Proposed is a rezone of 13 acres from R-4 to R-6 and to subdivide the site into 70 lots for detached single-family residences. Should the rezone not be granted, the applicant has proposed an alternative of subdividing the east 11.46 acres under R-4 zoning into 46 lots for detached single-family residential use. Rezone and Formal plat SEPA Threshold Determination: Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) CommenUAppeal Procedure: Comments on this SEPA .detennination are welcome. This SEPA_ determination may also be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. A notice of appeal must be filed with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on January 16, 2003, and be accompanied with a filing fee of$250.00 payable to the King County Office ofFinance. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall also file a Statement of Appeal with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on January 16, 2003. The Statement of Appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including the file number) and the alleged e1Tors in that decision. Further, the Statement of Appeal Shall state: l) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the hann suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failnre to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal Appeals must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) at the following address: · DDES-Land Use Services Division Attn: Permit Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Date Mailed: December 23, 2002 C ~ you have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the Land Use Services Division at 006-296-6600. If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, call 206-296-6600 (voice) or 206-296-7217 (TIY). PH\spn\Notic:• ot Dachion !ilPA. TD.doe de 7/n/n RECEIVED JAN 2 2 2003 I DATE: TO: CC: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM December 27, 2002 Jim Gray/Fire Department Lys Hornsby/Utility Systems Sandra Meyer/fransportation Lesley Betlach/Parks Director Gregg Zimmerman; P/B/PW Administrator Jennifer Henning; Development Planning.f\0/.,,'1 /1 King County DDES Notice of Decision File#: LOIP0016 & LOITY401/Evendell Subdivision & Rezone Attached is a copy of the above subject notice. Comments must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) by January I fi, 2003. ~!0~s"l r~fer to the attachment for complete details. Please submit all comments to Gregg Zimmerman, allowing sufficient response time. Co~""'~,,+s. n,s pv~po~eJ Jevelo1H,te111,f Is w1 llir11. l?erifo'ts Pofe•1:hd A,...11.e1'1ti·t<>#\ A¥~a. ~ell"~('/ we re1t,(erf f-'1-:1,f: · • R. Jhf o{ w .iy de.Jr c:,:/ioi, afo'1.j SE. l3bi<t "51Yeef iiJ,1.4-f{,"':J ft+e. ~eve(of""e ... + :ni"fe C.O"'-""""S w1/4 C,+y o( f<e,.,t-o,i s~;;,,c.J;,,.cfs (t.e, .a. '9l1Kr 11,t..,.., of 2o ~e+), Al s o1 v'JhJ-of ipJ.y deei,c a,./-,., ... t,,t,, /-t..e .1"t-+ev11a-/ ,s+,,.eef srsfe,... :sho,...((.( ltf~ef C, ry, o~l(e.,.+,,,. ~h, .. J-:,..Js, 9 S-{,.ee.+ •"11.fi-ove~ell\.f-r (lr•<JdwJJy pave ... e.,,,+ ·· · ~uvb a.d /J,,d{ er~ 'S'tdtw~lk.1 s n.e:ef /11(+,':7 .1 e.f..c} be i,-ef"l•ved .f;r'#t, por--ho/1\ ()J: ·l'~e s,+e eb11ff, .. 1 s~ /':J~f-t... S1"e~t-.a .. J :1bl.(H1;/ I /,0 -/11. ,4.,,e ,u< t S E, · ' ~'!'. rerl.f•vel ~tve.ef f-""tfl-ov~l'!Ad/1\i-s .i/olifj' ~£ l?l.f4..S~...rf: //,~~ ~v~it1.1.t ~€ ;,J Ht'-1,ifev1t:,{ sfz,.e,::,.f--s7~fe-/ RECEIVED be t"'-5-t~l(el JiA. a.cu;i,,/.;,.111,(,e wvK ~.fit ,{,te,11,:fc"'- S-hflld~,,J 5 , JAN 2 2 2003 , DATE: TO: CC: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM December 27, 2002 Jim Gray/Fire Department Lys Hornsby/Utility Systems Sandra Meyer/fransportation Lesley Betlach/Parks Director Gregg Zimmerman; P/B/PW Administrator Jerurifer Henning; Development Planning;P/ofT d King County DDES Notice of Decision 12.-30--02 Ly-s, . . Ju..,,+-1 h. ~ y ~ v.-d t-6 v.' + .Q_\.~o-.y s~e.. .. ,, ~} CV\!\ RECEIVED DEC 3 O 2002 CITY OF RENT ur,urv svsra.i~N File#: L01P0016 & L01TY401/Evendell Subdivision & Rezone Attached is a copy of the above subject notice. Comments must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) by January 16, 2003. Please refer to the attachment for complete details. Please submit all comments to Gregg Zimmerman, allowing sufficient response time. RECEIVED JI\N 2 2 2003 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 November 26, 2002 Mike Romano Centurian Development Services 22617 S'h Drive SE Bothell, WA 98021 RE: Additional Information Request Application No. LOI TY 401 & L01POOl6 -Evendell Dear Mr. Romano: The purpose of this letter is to provide written notice that the Land Use Services Division has requested additional information and/or studies to complete the review of the above- referenced project. This information is necessary to continue processing the application. Recently, copies of several downstream drainage claims and complaints were released to us and were forwarded to you by fax and mail. I understand that Bruce Whittaker has discussed with you by phone these complaints and his concerns. Please review this new information with the project engineer. After reviewing the complaints, submit an addendum to the Level III Downstream Analysis, which provides analysis of the complaints (6 copies). The analysis shall include proposed mitigation for the downstream problems per Core Requirement 2 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. If any mitigation is proposed on private property, a letter of intent is required from the property owner. When submitting the requested information, include copies of the letters requesting information and retain copies for your records. Provide a cover letter, which lists how each item, was addressed. Any clarification or explanation of the submittal can also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN: Karen Scharer, Planner II, Current Planning Section 900 Oaksdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 If the submittal is hand delivered, submit at the address above. L01TY401 & LOlPOOIL November 26, 2002 Page 2 Your application is on "hold" from the date of this notice, until the date you are advised that the additional information satisfies this request or 14 days after the date the information has been provided. You will be notified if the Division determines that the information is insufficient. Please note that the supplemental information required after vesting of a complete application shall not affect the validity of such application. The deadline for the submittal of the information is January 27, 2003. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist, which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request, in writing, for consideration by this Department. Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If possible, please submit all of the information in one package. If you have any questions, regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-7114 or by e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov. Current Planning Section cc Kim Claussen, Planner III, Current Planning Section, LUSD Bruce Whittaker, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Kris Langley, Supervisor, Traffic & Engineering, KCDOT Laura Casey, Senior Ecologist, Site Development Services, LUSD Application File Howard Stansbury, U.S. Land Development Associates C/0 Centurian Development Services 22617 gth Drive SE, Bothell, WA 98021 ., Sch;,rer; Karen From: Wright, Jenny Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:33 AM Scharer, Karen To: Subject: RE: L01P0016 L01TY401 Geneva Scholes She sent 10.00 cash and I have not done anything with it yet. So I will mail back her cash. -----Original Message----- From: Scharer, Karen Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:17 AM To: Wright, Jenny Subject: RE: L01P0016 L01TY401 Geneva Scholes I'll call -but first -will we be sending the money in cash or by check? -----Original Message----- From: Wright, Jenny Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9: 10 AM To: Scharer, Karen Subject: RE: L01P0016 L01TY401 Geneva Scholes Yes it is 425 228 2312 -----Original Message----- From: Scharer, Karen Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:09 AM To: Wright, Jenny Subject: RE: L01P0016 L01TY401 Geneva Scholes No!!!!! Please return the money. Thanks. Did they leave a phone#? -----Original Message----- From: Wright, Jenny Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:58 AM To: Scharer, Karen Subject: RE: LO!P0016 L01TY401 Geneva Scholes There isn't a letter it is a stub cut off says to mail to : Karen Scharer Planner It looks like they are requesting to be made a party of record in the evendell applications. Is there a fee for this? -----Original Message----- From: Scharer, Karen Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:55 AM To: Wright, Jenny Cc: Borba, Greg Subject: RE: L01P0016 L01TY401 Geneva Scholes Read the letter & see what the $10 is for? I have no idea why they sent money, that is unless they want copies of something. If you can't figure it out, please return. -----Original Message----- From: Wright, Jenny Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 8:21 AM To: Scharer, Karen Subject: L01P0016 L01TY401 Geneva Scholes Good Morning, We (the finance dept) received cash with a bottom half of a letter regarding party of record and included was $10.00. How should this be routed? Should we post the 10.00 to tL ---- permit#? 1 Scha'rer, Karen • From: Sent: To: Subject: Highlands Neighbors [highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com] Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:04 AM Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV RE: Evendell Status question What is the definition of the term 11 SEPA TD"? What is the current target date for SEPA Determination to be made public? Thank you, Gwendolyn High >From: 11 Scharer, Karen 11 <Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV> >To: 1 Highlands Neighbors 1 <highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com> >Subject: RE: Evendell Status question >Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:06:50 -0700 > >The checklist has been revised. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Highlands Neighbors [mailto:highlands_neighbors@hotmail.comJ ,sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:01 PM >To: Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV >Subject: RE: Evendell Status question > > ,Hello! > >Thank you for helping us to understand the process. > >It sounds like the second of the most recent requests for additional data >has been met, but I can not tell if the response for the first (sewer pipe >specifications) is still outstanding. 1) Please advise as to the current >status. > > >2)Also, what is a SEPA TD? I think I know what a SEPA Determination is. Is >this the same thing? 3)What is the target date for this decision to be made >public? > >Thank You! ,Gwendolyn High > > >From: "Scharer, Karen" <Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV> > >To: 1 Highlands Neighbors' <highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com> > ,subject: RE: Evendell Status question > >Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:10:01 -0700 > > > >We held our in-house meeting with only county staff on 10/7. 1 The >applicant > >n6r neighbors were invited. This is our standard procedure. > >A letter was mailed to the applicant on October B, 2002. > > > >We requested: > > > >· Environmental Checklist: > > # 16, Utilities, Page 13 -Clarify the size of sewer piping > >proposed in conjunction with plat development. > > >>·Wetland/Wildlife Study: > > You may wish to update your wildlife study to address needed > >mitigation. > > > >The applicant submitted a revised checklist & once in-house review is > >completed, we will issue a SEPA TD and then a pre -hearing date & hearing > >date will be scheduled. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Highlands Neighbors [mailto:highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com] > >Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:58 AM > >TO: Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV > >Subject: RE: Evendell Status question > > > > > >We would like to send representation to the Technical Review meeting. > >Please > >let us know how we may properly request inclusion in this meeting. > > > >Thank You! > >Gwendolyn High > > > > >>>From: "Scharer, Karen 11 <Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV> >>>TO: 'Highlands Neighbors' <highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com> >>>Subject: RE: Evendell Status question >>>Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 13:34:48 -0700 > > > >>>Information was submitted on 8/29/02. > > > >>>I will be routing the information & scheduling a meeting will staff to >>>review the documents. Once completed, we may request additional > >information >>>or prepare to schedule a technical review meeting, then a public >hearing, >>>etc. > > > >>>-----original Message----- >> >From: Highlands Neighbors [mailto:highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com] >>>Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:56 PM >>>To: Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV >>>Subject: Evendell Status question > > > > > > >>>Good Afternoon! > > > >>>I am just writing to ask if the Evendell developers have submitted the >>>latest required data in time to meet today's deadline. We are looking 2 >>>forward to reviewing t > > > >>>Thanks! >>>Have a great weekend! >>>Gwendolyn High > > > > > > data as soon as it is submitt ------------------------------------>>>Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com > > > > > > > > > >....,.----,--:---,,-,---,----,,-,,-------------,---c-,-------- > >Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://rnessenger.msn.com > > >---------------,--------------------->Broadband? Dial-up? Get reliable MSN Internet Access. ,http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp Protect your PC -get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 3 Scharer, Karen From: Sent: To: Subject: Hello! Highlands Neighbors [highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com] Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:01 PM Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV RE: Evendell Status question Thank you for helping us to understand the process. It sounds like the second of the most recent requests for additional data has been met, but I can not tell if the response for the first (sewer pipe specifications) is still outstanding. 1) P.lease advise as to the current status. 2)Also, what is a SEPA TD? I think I know what a SEPA'Determination is. Is this the same thing? 3)What is the target date for this decision to be made public? Thank You! Gwendolyn High >From: 11 Scharer, Karen" <Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV> >To: 'Highlands Neighbors' <highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com> >Subject: RE: Evendell Status question ,Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:10:01 -0700 > >We held our in-house meeting with only _county staff on 10/7. The applicant >nor neighbors were invited. This is our standard procedure. >A letter was mailed to the applicant on October 8, 2002. > >We requested: > >· Environmental Checklist: > # 16, Utilities, Page 13 -Clarify the size of sewer piping >proposed in conjunction with plat development. > >· Wetland/Wildlife Study: > You may wish to update your wildlife study to address needed >mitigation. > >The applicant submitted a revised checklist & once in-house review is >completed, we will issue a SEPA TD and then a pre -hearing date & hearing >date will be scheduled. > >-----original Message----- >From: Highlands Neighbors [mailto:highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:58 AM >TO: Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV >Subject: RE: Evendell Status question > > >We Would like to send representation to the Technical Review meeting. >Please >let us know how we may properly request inclusion in this meeting. > >Thank You! >Gwendolyn High > > > >From: 11 Scharer, Karen" <Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV> > >TO: 'Highlands Neighbors' <highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com> > >Subject: RE: Evendell Status question > >Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 13:34:48 -0700 > > > >Information was submitted on 8/29/02. > > > >I will be routing the information & scheduling a meeting will staff to > >review the documents. Once completed, we may request additional >information > >Or prepare to schedule a technical review meeting, then a public hearing, > >etc. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Highlands Neighbors [mailto:highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com] > >Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:56 PM > >TO: Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV > >Subject: Evendell Status question > > > > > >Good Afternoon! > > > >I am just writing to ask if the Evendell developers have submitted the > >latest required data in time to meet today's deadline. We are looking > >forward to reviewing that data as soon as it is submitted. > > > >Thanks! > >Have a great weekend! > >Gwendolyn High > > > >----------------------------:~-------> >Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com > > > > >---~~~~-~--.,-,------------~---:~------->Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Broadband? Dial-up? Get reliable MSN Internet Access. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp 2 Scharer, Karen From: Sent: To: Subject: Highlands Neighbors [highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com] Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:58 AM Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV RE: Evendell Status question We would like to send representation to the Technical Review meeting. Pl~ase let us know how we may properly request inclusion in this meeting. Thank You! Gwendolyn High >From: "Scharer, Karen 11 <Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV> >To: 'Highlands Neighbors• <highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com> >Subject: RE: Evendell Status question >Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 13:34:48 -0700 > >Information was submitted on 8/29/02. > >I will be routing the information & scheduling a meeting will staff to >review the documents. Once completed, we may request additional information >Or prepare to schedule a technical review meeting, then a public hearing, >etc. > >-----original Message----- >From: Highlands Neighbors [mailto:highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com] >Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:56 PM >TO: Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV >Subject: Evendell Status question > > >Good Afternoon! > >I am just writing to ask if the Evendell developers have submitted the >latest required data in time to meet today 1 s deadline. We are looking >forward to reviewing. that data as soon as it is submitted. > >Thanks! >Have a great weekend! >Gwendolyn High > >-,----,--,---,-,--,----,-:-------------,---,,...,-------->Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Scharer, Karen From: Sent: To: Subject: Scharer, Karen Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:21 AM 'Highlands Neighbors' RE: Evendell Status question State Environmental Policy Act Threshold Determination SEE KCC 20.44 for more information -----Original Message----- From: Highlands Neighbors [mailto:highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:04 AM To: Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV Subject: RE: Evendell Status question What is the definition of the term 11 SEPA TD 11 ? What is the current target date for SEPA Determination to be made public? Thank you, Gwendolyn High >From: 11 Scharer, Karen" <Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV> >To: 'Highlands Neighbors' <highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com> ,subject: RE: Evendell Status question ,Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:06:50 -0700 > >The checklist has been revised. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Highlands Neighbors [mailto:highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com] ,sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:01 PM >TO: Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV ,subject: RE: Evendell Status question > > >Hello! > >Thank you for helping us to understand the process. > >It sounds like the second of the most recent requests for additional data >has been met, but ·r can not tell if the response for the first (sewer pipe >specifications) is still outstanding. 1) Please advise as to the current >status. > > >2)Also, what is a SEPA TD? I think I know what a SEPA Determination is. Is ,this the same thing? 3)What is the target date for this decision to be made ,public? > >Thal1k You! ,Gwendolyn High > > >From: "Scharer, Karen" <Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV> > >To: 'Highlands Neighbors 1 <highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com> > >Subject: RE: Evendell Status question > ,Date, Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12,10,01 -0700 > > > >We held our in-house meeting with only county staff on 10/7. The >applicant > >nor neighbors were invited. This is our standard procedure. > >A letter was mailed to the applicant on October 8, 2002. > > > >We requested: > > > >· Environmental Checklist: > > # 16, Utilities, Page 13 -Clarify the size of sewer piping > >proposed in conjunction with plat development. > > >>·Wetland/Wildlife Study, > > You may wish to update your wildlife study to address needed > >mitigation. > > > >The applicant submitted a revised checklist & once in-house review is > >completed, we will issue a SEPA TD and then a pre -hearing date & hearing > ,date will be scheduled. > > > >-----Original Message----- > ,From, Highlands Neighbors [mailto,highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com] > >Sent, Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10,58 AM > ,To, Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV > ,subject, RE, Evendell Status question > > > > > >We would like to send representation to the Technical Review meeting. > >Please > >let us know how we may properly request inclusion in this meeting. > > > >Thank You! > >Gwendolyn High > > > > >>>From: "Scharer, Karen" <Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV> >>,To, 'Highlands Neighbors' <highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com> >>>Subject, RE, Evendell Status question >>,Date, Tue, 3 Sep 2002 13,34,48 -0700 > > > >>>Information was submitted on 8/29/02. > > > >>>I will be routing the information & scheduling a meeting will staff to >>>review the documents. Once completed, we may request additional > >information >>>Or prepare to schedule a technical review meeting, then a public >hearing, >>>etc. > > > >>>-----Original Message----- >> >From, Highlands Neighbors [mailto,highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com] >>,Sent, Friday, August 30, 2002 2,56 PM 2 >>>TO: Karen.Scharer@METh ,.GOV >>>subject: Evendell Status question > > > > > > >>>Good Afternoon! > > > >>>I am just writing to ask if the Evendell developers have submitted the >>>latest required data in time to meet today's deadline. We are looking >>>forward to reviewing that data as soon as it is submitted. > > > >>>Thanks! >>>Have a great weekend! >>>Gwendolyn High > > > > > > ___________________________________ _ >>>Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com > > > > > > > > > >....,.----,---,----,-,---,---.,-,-------------,---,-,-------- > >Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com > > >--------,--------,-~~------------------->Broadband? Dial-up? Get reliable MSN Internet Access. >http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp Protect your PC -get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 3 Scharer, Karen From: Scharer, Karen Sent: To: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 9:07 AM 'Highlands Neighbors' Subject: RE: Evendell Status question The checklist has been revised. -----Original Message----- From: Highlands Neighbors [mailto:highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:01 PM To: Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV Subject: RE: Evendell Status question Hello! Thank you for helping us to understand the process. It sounds like the second of the most recent requests for additional data has been met, but I can not tell if t~e response for the first (sewer pipe specifications) is still outstanding. 1) Please advise as to the current status. 2)Also, what is a SEPA TD? I think I know what a SEPA Determination is. Is this the same thing? 3)What is the target date for this decision to be made public? Thank You! Gwendolyn High >From: 11 Scharer, 'Karen 11 <Karen. Scharer@METROKC. GOV> >To: 'Highlands Neighbors• <highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com> >Subject: RE: Evendell Status question >Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:10:01 -0700 > >We held our in-house meeting with only county staff on 10/7. The applicant >nor neighbors were invited. This is our standard procedure. >A letter was mailed to the applicant on October 8, 2002. > >We requested: > >· Environmental Checklist: > # 16, Utilities, Page 13 -Clarify the size of sewer piping >proposed in conjunction with plat development. > >· Wetland/Wildlife Study: > You may wish to update your wildlife study to address needed >mitigation. > >The applicant submitted a revised checklist & once in-house review is >completed, we will issue a SEPA TD and then a pre -hearing date & 1 hearing ,date will be scheduled. > >-----Original Message----- >From, Highlands Neighbors (mailto:highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com] ,sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:58 AM >TO: Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV ,Subject: RE: Evendell Status question > > >We would like to send representation to the Technica~ Review meeting. >Please >let us know how we may properly request inclusion in this meeting. > >Thank You! ,Gwendolyn High > > > >From: 11 Scharer, Karen 11 <Karen. Scharer@METROKC. GOV> > >To: 1 Highlands Neighbors' <highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com> > ,subject: RE: Evendell Status question > ,Date, Tue, 3 Sep 2002 13:34:48 -0700 > > > >Information was submitted on 8/29/02. > > > >I will be routing the information & scheduling a meeting will staff to > >review the documents. Once completed, we may request additional >information > >or prepare to schedule a technical review meeting, then a public hearing, > >etc. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Highlands Neighbors (mailto:highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com] > ,sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:56 PM > >TO: Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV > >Subject: Evendell Status question > > > > > >Good Afternoon! > > > >I am just writing to ask if the Evendell developers have submitted the > >latest required data in time to meet today's deadline. We are looking >. >forward to reviewing that data as soon as it is submitted. > > > >Thanks! > >Have a great weekend! > ,Gwendolyn High > > > >----------------------------,~-------> >Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com > > > > >---~-------~--------------,---,-,-------->Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com 2 Scharer, Karen From: Scharer, Karen Sent: To: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:10 PM 'Highlands Neighbors' Subject: RE: Evendell Status question We held our in-house meeting with only county staff on 10/7. The applicant nor neighbors were invited. This is our standard procedure. A letter was mailed to the applicant on October 8, 2002. We requested, · Environmental Checklist: # 16, Utilities, Page 13 -Clarify the size of sewer piping proposed in conjunction with plat development. · Wetland/Wildlife Study, You may wish to update your wildlife study to address needed mitigation. The applicant submitted a revised checklist & once in-house review is completed, we will issue a SEPA TD and then a pre -hearing date & hearing date will be scheduled. -----Original Message----- From, Highlands Neighbors [mailto,highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com] Sent, Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10,58 AM To, Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV Subject, RE, Evendell Status question We would like to send representation to the Technical Review meeting. Please let us know how w~ may properly request inclusion in this meeting. Thank You! Gwendolyn High >From: 11 Scharer, Karen 11 <Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV> >To: 'Highlands Neighbors' <highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com> >Subject: RE: Evendell Status question ,Date, Tue, 3 Sep 2002 13,34,48 -0700 > ,Information was submitted on 8/29/02. > >I will be routing the information & scheduling a meeting will staff to >review the documents. Once completed, we may request additional information >Or prepare to schedule a technical review meeting, then a public hearing, >etc. > >-----Original Message----- >From, Highlands Neighbors [mailto,highlands_neighbors@hotmail.com] ,sent, Friday, August 30, 2002 2,56 PM >TO: Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV >Subject, Evendell Status question > 1 ,, ,:· ~. r' ') TO: ~~l)pe~ ) ! ,::;; SUBJECT: MESSAGE: REClFOnM® 4S468/4P468 POLYPAK (50 SETS) 0 NO REPLY NECESSARY RE DI-LETTER@ FROM: c. rion vevelopment Services 22617 -8th Dr. SE Bothell, WA 98021 /lfJ.4d J. ~"'1.&vO OCT 1 4 2002 D REPLY REQUESTED -USE REVERSE SIDE CARBONLESS SPEED/SET ,· -, " /• , ' • RECIFIVEO .OC11 4 2002 .. SEPA RULES I . #'-" TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 15. Public Services 1 ,, ._,-JuNl'Y LAND USE SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so generally describe. Yes. Population growth in the immediate vicinity due to the propnsed project will require additio,,al fire, police and eme.gency health µ,otec:tion. It is likely that some of the new homes will contain families with school age children resulting in increased demand for education services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public _ services, if any. Mitigation fees, if required, will be paid on each individual unit. Portions of the property taxes paid by the home/lot owners will be targeted to the various public service providers. 1 6. Utilities a. C. SIGNATURE Cirde utilities currently available at the site; elecbicitv 1 natural gas. water, refuse service, telep:,one, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Cable TV. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity and Natural Gas will be provided by Puget Sound Energy; Cable TV service will be provided by AT&T Broadh¥1d; Telephone service will be provided by Qwest. Sel#er service will be provided bv the City of Retitu.i. Extension of a 1 O" diameter or 12" diameter sewer trunk main will be required along SE 136"' Stleet. In ael lili:«1 1 a se aage pump station will be required in the SE comer to the property. Water service will be provided by King County Water District 090. Connections to the various service mains will be made at the project frontage on SE 136'" St. and/or 1 &d" Ave. SE. Underground service will be constructed in conjunction with road and storm drainage construction activities. The above answers are true and com to the best of knowledge. I understand that the I ,e1,,.iA(i on them to make its decision. ' Date Submitted: -1-&c.::::::s:i.:_~/)'--_,,_/,c.,'tl~/<...L,~~'-"'-""Z.~--- -13- [Ch.197-1 1 RCW-p.40] (1983 Laws) ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055'1219 October 8, 2002 Mike Romano Centurian Development Services 22617 81h Drive SE Bothell, WA 98021 RE: Additional Information Request Application No. LOITY401 & L01P0016-Evendell Dear Mr. Romano: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance 12196, the Land Use Services Division is requesting additional information and/or studies to complete the review of the above-referenced project. The following information listed below is necessary to continue processing the application. Unless otherwise noted, please provide eight (8) copies of any submittal item. o Environmental Checklist: # 16, Utilities, Page 13-Clarify the size of sewer piping proposed in conjunction with plat development. o Wetland/Wildlife Study: You may wish to update your wildlife study to address needed mitigation. When submitting the requested information, include copies of the letters requesting information and retain copies for your records. Provide a cover letter, which lists how each item, was addressed. Any clarification or explanation of the submittal can also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN: Karen Scharer, Planner II, Current Planning Section 900 Oaksdale A venue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 If the submittal is hand delivered, submit at the address above. LOJTY401 & LOI POOi ••. · October 8, 2002 Page 2 Your application is on "hold" from the date of this notice, until the date you are advised. that the additional information satisfies this request, or 14 days after the date the information has been provided. You will be notified if the Division determines that the information is insufficient. Please note that the supplemental information required after vesting of a complete application shall not affect the validity of such application. The deadline for the submittal of the information is December 9, 2002. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist, which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request, in writing, for consideration by this Department. Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If possible, please submit all of the information in one package. If you have any questions, regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-7114 or by e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov. Sincerely, CT)?,_ bl JJ~--, / Karen J. Scliarer Current Planning Section cc Kim Claussen, Planner III, Current Planning Section, LUSD Bruce Whittaker, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Kris Langley, Supervisor, Traffic & Engineering, KCDOT Laura Casey, Senior Ecologist, Site Development Services, LUSD Application File Howard Stansbury, U.S. Land Development Associates C/0 Centurian Development Services 22617 81h Drive SE, Bothell, WA 98021 King County Department or Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Rebton, WA 98055-1219 -.· October 3, 2002 Gwendolyn High Member Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council 13405 15 8th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 RE: Evendell Rezone & Plat-L01TY401 & LOIP00!6 Dear Ms. High, Thank you for your letter received September 23, 2002 regarding the Evendell applications noted above. Your correspondence including petition has been entered into the file and will be considered when making a recommendation to the Hearing Examiner. Please note that ·only the first name on the petition, (Shirely Day, 14412 167th Pl. SE.) will be added to the list of interested persons. Please confirm that the remainder of her address is Renton, WA 98059 by contacting Carol Rogers at (206) 296-7116. If others wish to be added to the list of interested persons they may be added by individually submitting their request to DDES. We also consider copied letters signed by different individuals as a petition as well. Currently the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) is processing these applications in screening/technical review. After receipt of all additional information from the applicant, DDES will then proceed to issue a SEPA threshold determination (TD) and schedule the applications for hearing. As previously communicated, DDES has.not yet taken action regarding SEPA, nor have we prepared recommendations regarding the rezone and plat, therefore the examiner has not been forwarded any requests by DDES for scheduling of any hearings. As such, we have previously advised you that the appropriate time to request intervener status or prehearing conference from the examiner would be after DDES issues a SEPA TD and notice of the public hearing is published. As an interested party, you will receive notice of future action(s) regarding these applications by DOES and the Hearing Examiner. Direct testimony to the King County Council is nomially not accepted on a specific development application outside of an appeal. An appeal may be filed after the Hearing Examiner issues his Report and Recommendations to the Council. I am again encouraging you to access the DDES web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes/ where you can find Codes and Policies regarding processing of applications (see KCC 20.20 & KCC 20.24), Information Bulletin regarding SEP A, and Permit Information for application instructions. You may wish to also review past decisions oftlte examiner and Rules of Procedures at www.metrokc.gov/mkcc/HearingExaminer/. Member Four Cree.inc(' >rated Area Council Page 2 •• I am forwarding your letter to the Hearing Examiner at this time to address your requests for: I) intervener status, 2) specific instructions to schedule a prehearing conference, and 3) specific instructions to directly testify before the King County Council. Again, thank you for your interest in this matter. Karen Schar , PPM II Current Pl ing Section Land Use Services Division, DDES cc: Stafford Smith, Hearing Examiner, King County Hearing Examiner Office Application File No's. LOITY401 & LOIP00!6 Letter.frm/CoverLtr.SP 3/26/97 ',I~ -~~- King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 TTY (206) 296-7217 Alternative formats available _ _ upon request Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division ii,**********•"'****•********** IMPORTANT***************************** PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY FOR ALL DROP-OFFS Project No.: U1>1 J->¢d> I lo 4 L¢f TY!f¢ I Project Name: 1::\/.E,Nb,,p·LL.. FROM: Ghu12NOOL':< N i±tCe:!1 Company Name I Contact Person Telephone No.: LQ<5 9 11 b[ 17 TO: ~ N & H,Ar' t-'\IL- Date Received by LUSD lo,fi~fiijijfi ~ lJ11 SEP 2 3 !002 UdJ K.C." 0.0.1:'..S. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please print) Short Plat / Plats Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Lot Line Adjustment Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Right of Way Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Clearing / Grading Permit Additional information requested; please specify item(s) dropped-off: Other: ______________________________________ _ PLEASE NOTE: All drop-off item(s) will be logged into the computer under the project number, therefore, it is important that the top portion of this form is completed properly before you· drop-off anything. Assistance in finding a project number can be provided by speaking to a Land Use Services Division Person of the Day (POD) or the Zoning/Land Use Technician. Your cooperation is important. Thank you. LUSD Drop-Off Cover Sheet lg-cvs-dropoff.pdf 05-30-2002 Page 1 of 1 •• Citizens' Alliance for a Respo1111silbie IEvell'ldlell Hlghlands_Nelghbors@hotmall.com September 23, 2002 Karen Scharer Department of Development end Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton WA 98059 •• .,. ' . ~--··• . ' ', Re: PROPOSED EVENDELL ZONE RECLASSIFICATION AND PERMIT APPLICATIONS L01P0016 AND L01TY401 Dear Ms. Scharer, With this letter we submit the requests and signatures of over sixty member of our community to listed as parties of record in the applications listed above. In addition, we reiterate our requests submitted in our letter to you of June 4, 2000 regarding which we have received no response: o First, we ask to be listed as lnterveners when the applications listed above are presented for decision before the Hearing Examiner at the Public Hearing. o Further, we anticipate the need for a pre-conference hearing es provided under KCC 20.21.145. Please forward specific Instructions of the procedure by which we may properly request this hearing. o Finally, we wish to testify before the King County Council when the applications listed above are presented for decision before that body. Please forward specific instructions of the procedure by which we may properly request this right to testify. ;z ~ Gwendol~ ~ Member Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council 13405158"' Ave SE Renton WA 98059 425.917.0117 w e /} the neighbors of the proposed Evendell development. . do hereby request to be listed as Parties of Record in the applications for Preliminary Plat (LOJPOOJ 6) and Zone Reclossijicalion (LOJTY401). We wish to officially record our complete opposition to the Zone Reclassification application as well as our dismay and alarm on several points raised in the Preliminary Plat application. Character of the Neighborhood: . U-120 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states "King County shall not approve proposed zoning changes to increase density within the Urban area unless: a. The development will be compatible with the character and soo/e of the surrounding neighborhood; " The proposed development is utterly Incompatible with the existing neighborhood Furthermore, these parcels are within the Potential Annexation Area of Renton. whose Comprehenstve Pion and Land Use Plans show that this orea wt/I never be zoned at a higher density, so Evendell will never be compatible with the su"ounding neighborhood. Traffic Impacts: The proposed applications wl/1 flood a critical traffic corridor, J 5(/" Ave SE, with no provision for tum lanes, traffic signals, signage, sidewalks, or even a crosswalk. City ol Renton's Requirement of Annexation Is In Vlolatlon ol Stale Supreme Courl RuDng: City of Renton has indiooted Its intent to supply sanitary sewer service on the express condition that "the property owner(s) will be required to execute a covenant to annex form". In light of the Washington State Supreme Court ruling of March 14, 2002 which specifically requires aformo/ vote by the citizens for every annexation decision, we believe that the condition required by City of Renton in order to provide sanitary sewer constitutes a kind of prior restraint and Is in direct conflict with this ruling. Sensitive Areas Impacts: The proposed construction ofa new road across one of the Class I/wetlands does not meet the requirements ofKCC 2/A.24.330.Kwhlch states that a roadway can only be permtned to be built across a wetland when no altemative access Is practical, all negative Impacts can be folly mitigated, there would be no overall change in the wetland hydrology, and no diminishing of the flood storage capacity of the wetland would be caused. Altemate access to the parcels is easily practical, and Impacts will diminish the quality and fonct/onallty of the wetland. Impacts to Resident WIidiife: Page 6 (3.c.2.) of the Plat application states -"Pollutants associated with typical urban residential developments may eventually make their way to surface waters. "Recent scientific findings demand more stringent consideration of the em,tranmental Impacts of residential runoff Particular concern is warranted for the runoff of lawn chemicals into the two Class II wetlands. These wry pollutants will flow from this site drains directly into the Lower Cedar Rtver Basin, through the storm water drainage system and endanger the ecosystem of the federally protected salmon who spawn there. The application also states that two Priority Species (black tailed deer and ruffed grouse) and a Candidate Species (ptleated woodpecker) were Identified In the Wildlife Evaluation and Delineation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation, and Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Plan. However, no documentation lists any nocturnal nor hydrophilic wildlife, and no amphibians but tree frogs, despite the presence of two Class II wetlands. The Wildlife survey is Incomplete and poarly documented. Drainage Impacts: The proposed development Is to be located on two parcels completely surrounded by an established neighborhood In which all the houses haw individual septic tank systems. We are greatly concemed that the significant Increase oflmpervtaus surface will dramatlcally increase runoff and severely adversely affect our existing systems. This is of even more critical concern to us since there are two Class II wetlands on the subject parcels. Any damage to these systems wl/1 certainly negatlw/y affect runoff in our neighborhood. In addition, we are concerned that in the .,..nt of severely Increased runoff. and any subsequent septic system failure, there would be significant damage to the Cedar River as It is directly downstream from us. Longtime neighbors to parcels on which comparable development has been completed In our area haw suffered complete septic system failure and extenstve flooding damage directly attributable to the Impacts of that development. PubUc Subsidization of Private Development: The acceptance of the argument that the developers need the higher density zoning In order to cover the cosrs their Investment In the proposed Improvements to the sewer system infrastructure means that King County would be directly subsidizing this development and ff/quiring our neighborhood to bear an unfair burden for the resultant Impacts. Flnally, we ask the full protection of the law as provided by the State ol Washington Growth Management Act, under which all munlclpallfles are mandated to coordinate all aspects of urban planning under compatlble Comprehensive Plans, even In the absence ol formal lnlellocal Agreements: The City of Renton, which provides the Fire Protection services for these parcels, has higher standards for road construction, dimensions and road network connectivity speclj/cally to provide adequate Infrastructure for emergency vehicles. Furthermore, the City of Renton has stronger setback and other but/ding standards which must be considered In order to ensure compatibility with the character of this neighborhood. We are guaranteed these protections by Washington State Law. We will fight for them. Respectfully submitted by the undersigned clHzens ol lClng County, Washington, this 1 O"' day ol August, 2002. } ~ J { ~ •'"\ °'-("\ ' Q ;:J () I \/\ I (' ''9 ' ' -!.. .,. 'll rl ti\ () ~ r--• "A r-~ rl t'1:, r:; "l, r'\ \~ V\ h I • ~ ~ \I\ ,..,. N "{ ~ ~ :r-~ ~ ' lll ~ \J '-<.J ~ (/J vJ \i) • l..l.l ~ '-) (fl . ~ .J . ~ Vl I ~ s1 ~ ~ . S" ~ <l: ~~ ~ ~ j._ ~ '1 ~ 0 -1... ~ f,~ <ii:'. 'f -9, ·~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J} ~ J ..._ Ir) -1/) 'J-' ' j ...... .... b; I ..... I '<::> \I' ,.:.. • ',}\. c:s ~ ('.::) (So ~ -~ ~ <') ~ .. ~ 0 .... "' ~ } '-' ~ ~ <;) ..... J ~ ~ fV') "f) ..,... ....... ~ --f'(l -......... ...... '--..... .._ 1 ~ -i,.) \--""' ~ :z. ct ~ i ~ t ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ oJ . -" 0:: ~ ~ ., "' (II Qj -a) ~ ~ t :5 _., t -, j "Y. '"~ '<..._ " / /-red/!--le/q<9t Jaqt/es 'LI ,'1--.ar IGc,,J'",' w' ' I 11-..._ ,vi' tf.du>a. rd J, rl ,II .J'ie.. ))/ i..~· r:2..or!DPr J3R j__.;JN T r'V\AIZ.:'.)i-\A ((OLUN be'(2. · s Fl===-e ~)(,~ J.. e., £. 0 J'S l! ;J ~t,J' Pf~:!IY'ft Flp.,'f~ ~~ '!J(),7c..."'-u4<Gt.l \ t; 2.c,v\ /'5-t, Ave {?_ e /1 -1-c;, y,/c,-.. ~5"-·.J,-J_l, .9('.. Bl. 'L.1 1cJs . .;.Js-sr: 15 u 'i c. -se ,~e T~ PL. l<.e1'STCN, WI\ 9BCS'\ I ~u2..r JS?iM/iJeJ'S K-Sc.-t t-w, ' <,t,,tA Cj t'CJ ,)--.::r l A 'T' { '-{ -I 5°'a ";1;,e.. $ F. ' I{ei-i fu?<-t ~& --- J S' I/ 'J o J" 6 I J ;J-Nb J"T £ .J T !).,.J i<;£/'1 S £ iJ2/l.d .$ ,,- Ir R.Bf\Tvl\., w A I <t 'bOS"• ll 4 >.3 tt"J (;_ ~l.,M..· ~ G l'<N'\'~ -___i.:-11'\ -_ q ~ >') //l{_5;> \£.:~r-' ...,.... $,6 . .\~ w qf)'5 >/'3.S- z. u.., -12-0 Lj 't2.5. '2.17. 0'2.•15 '+,9-S--;) '7 /-I f(7 '=, l[( 7; ft :z. '?""'-'7 /, I, '!'I" I 'I)-,f -.). /) 'I,./ It(, • <(2S -<. c G"''f'-(CQ '1~~2,"17 1"$!t ~i.{-1.-17 'i 3fl- I .r '· ."'; • • I><) ' "' ~ I'("\ r'( ('.I ~ "" c--1 ~ :;:;-... l,lj 'I-! 1/\ If' ~ ~ J.\ {-., ~ ' --\/) :'( ....:i ~ --·~ ...... r<, - ,' ~ \ ~ I) ~ I'- VJ ~ ' ' I) ~ I'\ il> CD f I ~ ;:;::i C: ~ 0'\ ~· ~ £' ~ --Q 1';1 ~ {t) fT\ ~ e ~· J· ~ ' 7J :=t-D ~ -z ~-\J ~ tti <::::,. < --....... ~ ~ ---.. ~ -......... -~ t ~ ~ ~. \),I "". 8: '}-!> ~ ~ ct. ~ 9-J -N ' '-...... C) C) C) -f' I'\ ~ ' ~ I & w V:, ,V) ......._ I ~ ,t -~ °' -~ OJ ~ I,' ; ~ ~ 0,1 ~. "-~ ~. ~ Y> k, --!::;. ~ ~ \ <. --1 ~ ~ n """' .::s-,. ~ fl'\ l/) (~ C/'\ . ~ --, VJ ~ ii\. . r-t\ • -ti --<.I::: '{::· ~ ~ le:. ..;t: jJ t ~t ~t ~~ 'I-> '!:s ~~ N c,, N \ .J\ ~~ .~ !'~ lf\ 'f' ~01 .:s I 0p ~· I ' ' I I ~ \Jt ( / ~ t N oQ '}, I ~ ~ * ' ~ ~°' -J ~ ~ ll wCA 00 1: '-J~ ~ j 0 ~ ~( ~\ ~ (? r 'F.. ~ ~ ~ ' ' .. ' ·. ~ . . .. .. Drop-Offf ·uso ONLY . King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division Cover Sheet 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 TTY (206) 296-7217 Alternative formats available upon request Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division •******************•******** IMPORTANT *****•******************•"'*""• PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY FOR ALL DROP-OFFS Project No.: L¢1 f::::¢c/i ( 10 4 Lrj>f ·y Yi±¢ I Project Name: E\/€Nl;::,,p:LL FROM: Ghu12Nt:£:)L':( II.) l±tc-ra Company Name / Contact Person Telephone No.: LfLt:5 9 IJ bf I 7 TO: ~EN&~ Date Received by LUSD f53~~~ijV!~ ITT} SEP 2 s 2DDZ IJdJ l<.C.~ D.D.E.S. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please print) Short Plat / Plats Please specify item(s) dropped-off: -----Cx 2-0 Lot Line Adjustment Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Right of Way Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Clearing / Grading Permit Additional information requested; please specify item(s) dropped-off: Exhibit No. --"'£J=-e.._ ___ _ 1te1111~0. t...~ I f\l~ 16s ~ Received 3·1n -~3 L-{) 1 ).JI:)/ King Crnmty Hearing Examiner Other:------------------------------------- PLEASE NOTE: All drop-off item(s) will be logged into the computer under the project number, therefore, it is important that the top portion of this form is completed properly before you drop-off anything. Assistance in finding a project number can be provided by speaking to a Land Use Services Division Person of the Day (POD) or the Zoning/Land Use Technician. Your cooperation is important. Thank you. LUSD Drop-Off Cover Sheet lg-cvs-dropoff.pdf 05-30-2002 ·.::> C> Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Evendell Highlands_Nelghbors@hotmall.com September 23, 2002 Karen Scharer Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton WA 98059 Re: PROPOSED EVENDELL ZONE RECLASSIFICATION AND PERMIT APPLICATIONS L01P0016 AND L01TY401 Dear Ms. Scharer, With this letter we submit the requests and signatures of over sixty member of our community to listed as parties of record in the applications listed above. In addition, we reiterate our requests submitted in our letter to you of June 4, 2000 regarding which we have received no response: o First, we ask to be listed as lnterveners when the applications listed above are presented for decision before the Hearing Examiner at the Public Hearing. o Further, we anticipate the need for a pre-conference hearing as provided under KCC 20.21.145. Please forward specific instructions of the procedure by which we may properly request this hearing. o Finally, we wish to testify before the King County Council when the applications listed above are presented for decision before that body. Please forward specific instructions of the procedure by which we may properly request this right to testify . .A~-1:. Gwendolyn High ~ Member Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council 13405 158'" Ave SE Renton WA 98059 425.917.0117 / ' . _! ___ J ' I I I . I I ·'· I .. :.~----_\__ '' : -·----·t I' '' ,. ' j • .. .. ~ @ I} the neighbors of the proposed Evendell development. do hereby request to be listed as Parlies of Record in the applica.ions for Preliminary Plat (LOJPOOJ 6) and Zone Reclassijica.ion (LOI TY 401). We wish to officially record our complete opposition to the Zone Reclassijica.ion application as well as our dismay and alarm on several points raised in the Preliminary Plat applica.ion. Character of the Neighborhood: U-120 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states "King County shall not approve proposed zoning changes to Increase density within the Urban area unless: a. The development w/1/ be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhood; "The proposed development Is utterly incompatible with the existing neighborhood. Furthermore, these parcels are within the Potential Annex a lion Area of Renton, whose Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Plans show that this area w/1/ never be zoned at a higher density, so Evende/1 will never be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood Traffic Impacts: The proposed applications w//1 flood a critical traffic corridor, 1511' Ave SE, with no provision for tum lanes, traffic signals, signage, sidewalks. or even a crosswalk. City of Renton's Requirement of Annexation Is In VlolaHon of State Supreme Court Rullng: City of Renton has indicated its intent to supply sanitary sewer service on the express condition that "the property owner(s) will be required to execute a covenant to annex form". In light of the Washington State Supreme Court ruling of March 14. 2()()2 which speciflcally requires a formal vote by the citizens for every annexation decision, we believe that the condition required by City of Renton in order to provide sanitary sewer constitutes a kind of prior restraint and is in direct conflict with this ruling. SenslHve Areas Impacts: The proposed construction of a new road across one of the Class II wetlands does not meet the requirements of KCC 2/A.24.330.K which states that a roadway can only be permitted to be built across a wetland when no alternative access is practical, all negative impacts can be folly mitigated, there would be no overall change in the wetland hydrology, and no diminishing of the flood storage capacity of the wetland would be caused. Alternate access to the parcels is easily practical, and impacts will diminish the quality andfanctiona/ity of the wetland Impacts to Resident Wlldllfe: Page 6 (3.c. 2.) of the Plat application states -"Pollutants associated with typical urban residential developments may eventually make their way to surface waters. "'Recent scientific findings demand more stringent consideration of the environmental impacts of residential runoff. Particular concern is warranted for the n.mojf of lawn chemicals into the two Class II wetlands. These very pollutants will flow from this site drains directly into the Lower Cedqr River Basin, through the storm water drainage system and endanger the ecosystem of the federally protected salmon who spawn there. The application also states that two Priority Species (black tailed deer and ruffed grouse) and a Candidate Species (pi/eated woodpecker) were identified in the Wildlife Evaluation and Delineation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation, and Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Plan. However, no documentation lists any nocturnal nor hydrophilic wildlife, and no amphibians but tree frogs, despite the presence of two Class II wetlands. The Wildlife survey is incomplete and poorly documented. Drainage Impacts: The proposed development ts to be located on two parcels completely surrounded by an established neighborhood in which all the houses have individual septic tank systems. We are greatly concerned that the significant increase of impervious surface wtll dramatically increase runoff and severely adversely affect our existing systems. This is of even more critical concern to us since there are two Class II wetlands on the subject parcels. Any damage to these systems will certainly negatively affect runoff tn our neighborhood. In addition, we are concerned that in the event of severely increased runoff. and any subsequent septic system failure. there would be significant damage to the Cedar River as It is directly downstream from us. Longtime neighbors to parcels on which comparable development has been completed in our area have suffered complete septic system failure and extensive flooding damage directly atlributable to the impacts of that development. Publlc SubsldlzaHon of Private Development: The acceptance of the argument that the developers need the higher density zoning in order to cover the costs their investment in the proposed improvements to the sewer system infrastructure means that King County would be directly subsidizing this development and requiring our neighborhood to bear an unfair burden for the resultant impacts. Finally, we ask the full protecHon of the law as provided by the Slate of Washington Growth Management Act. under which all munlclpallHes are mandated to coordinate all aspects of urban planning under compaHble Comprehensive Plans, even In the absence of formal lntel1ocal Agreements: The City of Renton. which provides the Fire Protection services for these parcels, has higher standards for road construction. dimensions and road network connectivity speclftca//y to provide adequate infrastructure for emergency vehicles. Furthermore, the City of Renton has stronger setback and other building standards which must be considered in order to ensure compatibility with the character of this neighborhood We are guaranteed these protections by Washington State Law. We will fight for them. Respectfully submllled by the undersigned clHzens of King County, Washington, this 10th day of August. 2002. .. . ; . L. ., • ('i ... ' : n ; . ,, , .Ill . '"\ I',• \1 '. . •; .' '.: ., •', ~ :.• ,. ,. Sl. 1' \ ... , ' t' ."\·\ ., , '' , · 1, ' " ·'' 'l .. " ...... ,, . ,. '' ... '1 '',, '·' ,. ' . ' . \ :_ \ ,·,., • l ;,• ':1•.t .'.• '1 l \,, I I.' I)\ • ,\.. • i:' ,· ·: \ \. : · .. ,, . \ '·' '\'. ,. Jl \\\~ ..•. ,'' '···:.. ,,. " ) ...... "' '·, .'1· ,,,,, ' ··1\. ) "' l:Jt1l· f .,·~·.j:· ,, \, I,•,),• "· ,, ' ... " ,, j I ,• I, ,, \,' ,,1 •'r,· ., •''t J• . ' ., ,, , ,', I ','\, , '"I , ··1• I • ,,} ,. I,,· , 1• ,, I ',, \n , r ··,. ,. 1 .-•. .., r-~1-... 1'. ·\ · 1, , . , , . •• ", ,,.\ · ~v. :11!<:1,11'1 .,, / .. ); • .'J 'I.C~ ·,c .:}{1 ,1 ) ·.·,r' r· nr. 1 ·; .er, , . ._r, '1:. T.O:) \ .,. \ . ... '· ' .,' '((. l·:-.tif'f'.t' ,. " '"" ') ,I", . ' ...,. ; •' ~:f:'."f~·\' ." ..;<,-- ~1/~:t . ., \- •• ,. r .• ,'&1"' ·"1 ,~. ~ ·«.;r "'t:. ' ,., '. ,·, .""'-' . " ,, ' \1 ~ cs ~ I)) "" ~ ~ ~ I\) l ,' ---.. l ';:p :J'" ~ -l. --t 0 ' .J. -. 3 J ~ $) '-9 ~ 7" rJ 0 () ..:, r-"" f:i '" '>I :i- ~ 'l.) " ~ i '-.: \l) '9 ,, 2 ':t: ~ ·J l-j ..) c;? 13 L ~ <l'., ~ :r ~ //J ~ 'S:!. '(I <( \I~ ~ ~ ~ '-'- .. ,.£)WI ~ "I' ~ ~ Cl 00~ ~ ..., r.:> _,.. --"' \ )-~ ~ s-.. I I :),... I -s,--...... "" \l) r-"" I:' I~ " (\; ·I":: " ~ N r-) ~ r-• l.., fr, ""' J ( l ~ rl ;,, ~ \' i r\ r,, s ~ .... ,,,_ ~ ::r ~ g 1 1\' __( -~ -~ ~ \, ~ ~ ,( i J' 7: ..... ~ " r-' I , .,,,,.. '-.. .. . ' -.s Q .,.. r! N I "f .,., I "" \.) r< I'(\ <"( ~ ~ V", r...j -:;r;. ~ \~ 'N V\ 10 ~ ~ q: "' f.-'l ' ~ 1/) --- :'( -..:i ~ ·~ ---·-r<") - I . ,:;:_--I ~· () ~ ,.._ ' I) ~ 0 fl ?I> ~ f I ~ c::. ~ -~· ~ £' ~ "'-l"i\ { ~ 0 ~ I' ~ :::r-I', D -z t/) t \J ~ ~. ~ ~ c=> \ t. ~ rs-~ -("I SJ r. I. . ~ <:-- -'-.. ~ t; '· i. ......._ .......... --\>S !; ~ 6'-~. $..I ~ }' ~ ~ ..t ~ µ -..... ~ )--> I I:\ ' C) ~ I' Q c::, f' I' I C) ~ ~ w v:i ,Vi ....._ ~ \ ~ ,t _Ir\ (5-.... -....... l,U i'l'i· w ~ 'o' CT'. ; UJ (';,l w \ ~ "· ~ ~ ' '-' \'?-t ~ ~ ~ ::w k, * ~ ~ <:. r'-' --l ~ n; n !f r ii --c:. ::s--. ~ fl) "<-c.() lY\ IJ) (t:i t' (.._ c/\ 0 ,-0 ~ ' 0::> &c ({\ ., --.:F._' --, M M ~~0 ~ . ~ "' ., .-t:, • ~ 'v -<l::: ~· i ~ -t_ !.:: -;t: )J t J~ ~...r ~~ -.ti ~ ',J N 'I-> '1-> )..:, t.J ~~ \ J\ ~~ !<A... 1.,1 ~vl ~ "\ ~· I I ~ ) ' I 'J\ _'.:$ I \l\ ~ ',,., 1 I / ~r t'. 1.-t )\.J Cl'{ '},, I ~ ~\ ,.b, I ~ 'i WCA t "' --! "-J ~ ~ ~ 0 l) 00 ~ ~ :i 0 c:.i ~( I 0' ~ "O t::!. " ' ~ ..__j ~ ~ ~ . cg ...._, ~- ' ,, ' F~LE COP) 22617-S'h Dr. SE Bothell WA 98021 Karen Schaler, Planner 11 LO 1 PO O 'll6 CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 30, 2002 King County Department of Development and Environmental Selvices Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton.WA 98055-1219 (425) 486-2563 OFF (425) 486-3273 FAX AUG 2 .0 ?no2 L /\11,,. RE: ANo ustsu1_v, / 2nd Request for Information -Rezone and Plat of EVENDELL [RV/C[S Application Numbers: L01TY401 & L01P0016 Dear Karen: On behalf of our dient, U.S. Land Development Associates, please find the following in response to the referenced Request for Information: o 8 copies of a Level 3 Downstream Drainage Study dated 08/26/2002 prepared by Haozous Engineers. o 8 copies of a revised 70 Lot R-6 Preliminary Plat Map indicating the addition of a curve radius at the SE corner of the intersection of SE 136th Street and 156th Ave. SE. o 8 copies of a revised Environmental Checklist. I. RESPONSE TO MAY 16, 2002 NOTICE OF REQUEST Drainage DOES COllfJIIJENT: Level Three Off-site Drainage Study per Core Requirement 2 of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM). The study shall evaluate the downstream drainage complaints from King County and the concerns expressed in the neighborhood submittal (CORE). Please classify the problems as to severity and indicate proposed mitigation per Core Requirement 2. RESPONSE: Attached pt ase find 8 COflies of the req•rested study. The downstlWlm study ,-als -eral locations where flooding due to undersized culverts occurs. In addition, a severe erosion problem was also ideotiF.ed in the dowr.stteam system. The applicant has ~sed level 2 detention standards in conformance with the area requitements established in the 1998 KCSWDM maps which satisfy code requirements for stormwater discharge to an erosion problem. In addition, the applicant will either replace the under.sized culverts or upgrade the onse deaw1tion pond to leYel 3 detention • standards. "Let us take the load ... Karen Scharer August 30, 2002 Page 2 of 5 Road/Traffic Information: ODES COMIIIENT.· R-6 Alternative: Provide assessment of right-of-way necessary to construct the improvements proposed at the intersection of SE 136tn Street1156th A venue SE. This may include enhancements to the improvements required/proposed in conjunction with the plat of Highland Estates such as: conversion of the painted median north of the intersection to a southbound left tum lane meeting County standards; widening of 156th Avenue SE (north of that current proposed improvement); construction of curb returns meeting KCRS 2. 10A (3)(a); and shoulder improvements abutting any widened section. RESPONSE: The applicant has p,09Qsed the following impnm!ment to SE 136111 Street betweefl 158"' Ave. SE and 156"' Ave. SE: "In aadition, the proponent anticipates that p,.;,.,ry access will be from SE 136'" Street via 156'" Ave. SE Therefore, the applicants propose to improve SE 136'" Street to near full-width Neighborhood Collector standards from the plat entry west to 156'" Ave. SE. The exception is that the applicants do not propose to construct sidewalk or street trees along the north side. The applicallts believe that c~ of ;,,,pro.,-ts along the north side should be constructed when devel~t of p,v,perty fronting that side of SE 136'" Street occurs. " ( excerpted from submittal letter dated July 6, 2001.) Traffic studies have not indicated that tum lanes are n!qUired in any leg of the in1Jers4!ction. Therefore, it is our intent to provide the proposed improvements within the existing 30' right of way of SE 1~ Street plus additional right of way dedica1Jl!d with the ~:ed ptat as indicated on the preliminary ptat map. No additional improvements to 1 A11e. SE are piopc:ed. ODES COMIIIENT: If the result of right-of-way constraints at the intersection of SE 136th Street/156th Avenue SE includes curb returns that are significantly less than KCRS requirements of 359 [KCRS Sec.2. 10A (3)(a)], and right-of-way acquisition by the Applicant is unachievable teview WSDOT Design Manual 910.07(2) and (3) and Figure 910-12 for the consideration of speed change lanes tapers or tum lanes and amend traffic impact study to provide recommendation for the provision of a speed change lane for northbound traffic onto SE 136tn Street. RESPONSE: A 25' radius curb return has been added at the SE comer of the intersection of SE 1~ Street with 156111 Ave. SE. This will allow provision of a 35' J>abeiiillMt radius at that location. Disc• ISSions with the owner& of the property located at the NE com2r of the inle.'section for the purpose of obtaining a dedication for a 25' radius at that location were unsuccessful. "Let us take the load " Karen Scharer August 30, 2002 Page 3 of 5 .. Improvements to be ccnstrucled within 156"' Ave. SE in conjunction with the plat of Highland Estates require the full widlh of existing 156"' Ave. SE right of way at this location. Accordingly, there is no room within this right of way for additional improvemetlts. On July 1~, 2002 Gary Noms of Gany Struthers Associates held a telephone meeting with Kristen L..angtey of the King County Depa,b,.a,t of TrallSflOitation. From that discussion it is our understanding that Ms. langleys' primary concern was that the lack of a standard pa-.,t radius at the SE comer of the inlersection would adversely affect the ability of nonhbound traffic on 156"' to adequateiy change Sfl ee ds for a right tum to eas ti IOI.Ind SE 136"' (see copy of e- mail memo from Gary Norris dated July 16"', 2002 attached). Provision of the right of way and pavement radius at the SE comer as shown on the revised preliminary plat map ~ alleviate that concern. ODES COMMENT: Provide assessment of pedestrian improvement needs along 160th A11enue SE between the Joint Use Driveway Tract 'H' and the intersection of SE 136th Street/160th Avenue SE. KCDOT has identified the need to provide shoulders on the east side of the roadway in the plat vicinity, to supplement the improvements to be constructed along the plat frontage. RESPONSE: It is our understanding that recent plat applications and/or planned appAications in the vicinity have alleviated this concern. R-4 Alternative: Provide assessment of pedestrian improvement needs along 160th A11enue SE. KCDOT has identified the need to provide shoulders on the east side of the roadway in the plat vicinity, to supplement the improvements to be constructed along the full length of the plat frontage. RESPONSE: It is our undefstanding that recent plat appAications and/or planned applications in the vicinity have alleviated this concern. "Let us take the load " Karen Scharer August 30, 2002 Page 4 of5 ·,/ Envirmm,antal Checklist: DOES COtllJHENT: # 4 b, Plants, Page 7 Clarify what portion of the site will be cleared for plat development. Will any trees or other existing vegetation (other than the sensitive area) be retained? # 5 d, Animals, Page 8 -Clarify what yard landscaping will be used to provide habitat opportunities. # 11 Light & Glare, Page 11 -Clarify what street lighting is proposed with plat development. RESPOI\ISE: Attached please find a revised Environmental Checklist providing the req1rested information. With regard to t.\<3b the site will be cleared in it's entirety with the ell('eption of the sensitive areas tract including the waland and wetland buffer and the plantings/landscaping within the limits of the lot containing the house to remain. All ottter existing vegetation will be remolled. Regarding landscaping in #5d the actual landscaping to be performed will depend on the hom2builder initially and, over tints, the homeowners. Typical landscaping is likely to incJude combinations of lawn, landscapP plants, shrubs and trees that thrive in the maritime environment of,,,_ est em Washington and various annual and peiennial flowers. Typical shrubs might include rhodcdendoon, azalea, Japanese ll\2fl4e, boxwood, juniper, pyramidalis etc. Trees might include dogwood, magnolia, cedar, blue spruce, cherry, p4um and ash. In addition, street trees are requin!d which will also provide habitat opportuniti2s. Street lighting in conformance with Puget Sound Energy (PSE) standards will be providad. Typically this wou6d include street lights at the comers of the loop road and othar loccDtions as deemed~ to provide a safe night-time driving and walking environment. Typical street lighas would consist of a 150 watt flat lens luminaire located atop a 25' light standard. Clarify what other permits and appro11a/s have been requested, and clarify the status of each application. Specifically, has a delermination of whether a Section 404 is required & if so has a permit been requested. "Let us Jake the load ... Karen Scharer August 30, 2002 Page 5 of5 .. .. RESPONSE: The Anny Corp of Engineers (COE) has jurisdiction Oller non-isotated wetlands in the United States. Because the onsite wetland is not adjacent to a stream or other water body the COE does not have jurisdiction thetefore no permit is required. Ho-,., even if the COE did have jurisdiction in this case Nationwide Permit 39 allows the titling of up to 1/1o"' of an acre (4,356 SF) of wetland without prior COE notification or l'eYiew but does require notification within 30 days after completion. Since the proposed road~ of SE 136"' Street will require filling less than 1/1o"' of an acre of wetland aiea no permit would be required, only notice when the work is complete. Other permits that will be required include a Forest Practices Application (FPA) from the Washington State Depc,1b,lb1t of Natural Resources (DNR) if Oller 5000 board feet of metchantable timber is to be han,ested and a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Si,stem (NPOES) permit from the washingtDn State Department of Ecology for clearing in enc e ss of 5 acres. Both of these pewnlits will be req• sled prior to start of construction but after preliminary plat approval. Please call me at (425) 486-2563 if you have any questions regarding the material submitted via this transmittal or if you require any additional information. Thank you for your efforts. Endosures CC: U.S. Land Attn: Howard Slansbury Sincerely, CENTURION DEVELOPMEN ~J Michael J. Romano Land Consultant "Let us take the load. " From: Sent: To: Cc: Su~: Mike, .. Gary, Nonis [garyn@gsassoc-inc.com] Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11 :23 AM michael.romano@gte.net Joan. Smelser Conversation witti Kristen Langley of King County .. As requested is a summary of my telcon with Kristen Langley on Monday July 15. Our conversation focused on two issues: l)Evendell -I asked Kristen the basis for the request for turn pockets or tapers at the intersection with 156th and 136th. Her indication to me was because of the requirement to provide the south bound left turn in the future would provide an inadequate radius and that north bound traffic might require a speed change lane to make the northbound right turn. Based on our conversation today, you indicated a 35 foot radius on the SE corner can be provided which should be adequate. There should be no requirement for speed change lanes in the east west direction if it is under stop control. 2)Aster Park -I had a short discussion with Kristen regarding Aster Park. We discussed the County requirement to accept the State 1 s request; proportionality of improvements; the north bound left turn; and the sight distance issues. Of specific interest would be Kristen's statement they didn't think the left turn would work so perhaps some additional layout would help and secondly Kristen didn't believe the sight distance issue was resolved either. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Thanks Gary .. .. ~~ gi!·c1::~:g~~~;;~~!~o;~~~~es ~rO 22617-8 Dr. SE. V Bothell, WA 98021 «'-<>~ July 2, 2002 Attn: Michael J. Romano ~ RE: Evendell Plat Modification Dear Mr. Romano: LOIP0016 AUG 2 9 2002 KING COUNI ( LAND USE SERVICES I hereby authorize Centurion Development Services, on behalf of U. S. Land Development Associates, permission to modify the proposed preliminary plat map to include a 25' road right of way radius at the intersection of SE 136th Street with 156th Ave. SE. I understand that the area contained within the limits defined by the 25' radius and the previously shown plat exception will be dedicated for road right of way and other public purposes. As a consideration to grant this proposed 25' right of way radius. A 12" eft:'.lemeRt ah,:J .--- NS or E!tlt siae ef my pF8f*:R¥ wr \ISG ef feei;ieg er Fetailling v.oall beW1eee em /r/1/ rb1llt:'; /Vt;? 11 1 Ii I peffles . ..1';0t'&a"£>.do/ &l/yE;;t.5d%vcw-r~rv0v 1'.Ct.1~££'7'!"±'::;M'--'-B"i Further as street grade is established and grading is being done to future lots I &2. Back ,:;1/,1 .-1?11').::?,C'.'.7 portion on Northern area ofmy propeft}'. ~I.I be graded accordi_ngly so as to conform to ;.?,;tZv-/c/.2~ over all appearance and grade oflo~ ~<l!OIWJlg~· .p_ o//tll;-S /311 Yiif.. /J~l6S/l/l/f"Ojf/1/;~ fll3 f"f'<,(). fbL 71/!6 //lJt1.e¥. . ' This change will be reflected in the legal description epicted on the plat map as we~~/ . V ;JJ/ in the purchase and sale agreement and all title documents. (')fa{iJJ In Witness Whereof, the parties herby affix their respective signatures on the date recite . above and state that they intend to be bound by the terms of this Amendment. Sel!!_rsii . -I . ?;TQ--l?'l'-1C(_ -1!/tJtvv o/¥~t!O;z.., Robert Mair Buyer: U. S. LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, A Washington general partnership By: Michael A. Utt Clyderae Mair By. 1 lA·14#~~J-- H~~r:nsbury I . r . ~@ = I. King County ren nE. Drop-Off fo. ~'1SD ONLY Dep~rtment of De~JJ,Jb and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division CO :-v Coversheet· 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 TIY (206) 296-7217 Alternative formats available upon request Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY FOR ALL DROP-OFFS Project No.: /v1:_-..dJCL L L D/T'/L/O~;io1POOli. Project Name: EV£'>v0EL L ,Ce,v_r,:,;z,(),-, ,t:>6V, ,s;vcs FROM: Hf;::,.-,e,,,,,,,,.,.,o Company Name I Contact Person Telephone No.: &?>:_) '-/ff. -z~-{.y TO: ~[ry ~ck,, .-e,< Date Received by LUSD K.C. D.D.E.S. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please print) Lot Line Adjustment Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Right of Way Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Clearing / Grading Permit Additional information requested; please specify item(s) dropped-off: Other:------------------------------------- PLEASE NOTE: All drop-off item(s) will be logged into the computer under the project number. therefore, it is important that the top portion of this form is completed properly before you drop-off anything. Assistance in finding a project number can be provided by speaking to a Land Use Services Division Person of the Day (POD) or the Zoning/Land Use Technician. Your cooperation is important. Thank you. LUSD Drop-Off Cover Sheet lg-cvs-dropoff.pdf 05-30-2002 r . --. ' Sc.harer, Karen a,,=============================================== Subject: Location: Start: End: Recurrence: Meeting Status: Required Attendees: Optional Attendees: Resources: Rescreening Mtg RR, DDES C1 Mon 10/07/2002 10:00 AM Mon 10/07/2002 11 :00 AM (none) Meeting organizer Scharer, Karen; Bruce Whittaker; Kristen Langley Laura Casey RR, DOES C1 I will be forwarding the information that recently was submitted to you. Karen 1 'I ' ® ,,,. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 August 13, 2002 Mike Romano Centurian Development Services 22617 s"' Drive SE Bothell, WA 98021 RE: Extension for Additional Information Request Application No. LOJTY401 & L01P0016-Evendell Dear Mr. Romano: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that a two week extension is granted for . submittal of additional information. Y mi will have until August 30, 2002 to submit this information. The following information listed below is necessary to continue processing the application. Unless otherwise noted, please provide eight (8) copies of any submittal item. o Level Three Off-site Drainage Study per Core Requirement 2 of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM). The study shall evaluate the downstream drainage complaints from King County and the concerns expressed in the neighborhood submittal (CORE). Please classify the problems as to severity and indicate proposed mitigation per Core Requirement 2. o Road/Traffic Infonnation: R-6 Alternative: Provide assessment of right-of-way necessary to construct the improvements proposed at the intersection of SE 136th Street/ 156th Avenue SE. This may include enhancements to the improvements required/proposed in conjunction with the plat of Highland Estates, such as: conversion of the painted median north of the intersection to a southbound left tum lane meeting County standards; widening of 156th Avenue SE (north of that current proposed improvement); construction of curb returns meeting KCRS 2.IOA (3)(a); and, shoulder improvements abutting any widened section. If the result of right-of-way constraints at the intersection of SE 136th Street/ 156th Avenue SE includes curb returns that are significantly less than KCRS requirements of35' [KCRS Sec.2.IOA (3)(a)], and right-of-way acquisition by the Applicant is unachievable, review WSDOT Design Manual 910.07(2) and (3) and Figure 910-12 for the consideration of speed change lanes, tapers, or tum lanes, 'LOITY401 & LOIPOOl6 August 13, 2002 Page 2 and amend traffic impact study to provide recommendation for the provision of a speed change lane for northbound traffic onto SE 136th Street. Provide assessment of pedestrian improvement needs along 160th Avenue SE between the Joint Use Driveway Tract 'H' and the intersection of SE 136th Street/l 60th Avenue SE. KCDOT has identified the need to provide shoulders on the east side of the roadway in the plat vicinity, to supplement the improvements to be constructed along the plat frontage. R-4 Alternative: Provide assessment of pedestrian improvement needs along 160th Avenue SE. KCDOT has identified the need to provide shoulders on the east side of the roadway in the plat vicinity, to supplement the improvements to be constructed along the full length of the plat frontage. o Environmental Checklist: # 4 b, Plants, Page 7 -Clarify what portion of the site will be cleared for plat development. Will any trees or other existing vegetation ( other than the sensitive area) be retained? # 5 d, Animals, Page 8 -Clarify what yard landscaping will be used to provide habitat opportunities. # 11, Light & Glare, Page 11 -Clarify what street lighting is proposed with plat development. o Other Permit Review: Clarify what other permits and approvals have been requested, and clarify the status of each application. Specifically, has a determination of whether a Section 404 is required & if so has a permit been requested. When submitting the requested information, include copies of the letters requesting information and retain copies for your records. Provide a cover letter, which lists how each item, was addressed. Any clarification or explanation of the submittal can also be included in the cover Jetter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN: Karen Scharer, Planner II, Current Planning Section 900 Oaksdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 If the submittal is hand delivered, submit at the address above. Your application is on "hold" from the date of this notice, until the date you are advised that the additional information satisfy this request, or 14 days after the date the information has been provided. You will be notified if the Division determines that the information is insufficient. Please note that the supplemental information required after vesting of a complete application shall not affect the validity of such application. ' LOITY401 & LOIP0016 August 13, 2002 .-Page 3 The deadline for the submittal of the information previously requested is August 30, 2002. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist, which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request, in writing, for consideration by this Department Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If possible, please submit all of the information in one package, If you have any questions, regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-7114 or by e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov, 4:_ 9 ,,,....__,, Karen J, Scharer Current Planning Section Land Use Services Division cc Kim Claussen, Planner III, Current Planning Section, LUSD Bruce Whittaker, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Kris Langley, Traffic & Engineering, KCDOT Laura Casey, Senior Ecologist, Site Development Services, LUSD Application File Howard Stansbury, U.S. Land Development Associates C/0 Centurian Development Services 22617 3th Drive SE, Bothell, WA 98021 ,• (® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 May 16, 2002 Mike Romano Centurian Development Services 22617 81 h Drive SE Bothell, WA 98021 RE: Additional Information Request Application No. LOITY401 & LOIP0016-Evendell Dear Mr. Romano: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that, pursuant to the ·provisions of Ordinance 12196, the Land Use Services Division is requesting additional information and/or studies to complete the review of the above-referenced project. The following infom1ation listed below is necessary to continue processing the application. Unless otherwise noted, please provide eight (8) copies of any submittal item. o Level Three Off-site Drainage Study per Core Requirement 2 of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM). The study shall evaluate the downstream drainage complaints from King County and the concerns expressed in· the neighborhood submittal (CORE). Please classify the problems as to severity and indicate proposed mitigation per Core Requirement 2. o Road/Traffic Information: R-6 Alternative: Provide assessment ofright-of-way necessary to construct the improvements proposed at the intersection of SE 136th Street/ 156th Avenue SE. This may include enhancements to the improvements required/proposed in conjunction with the plat of Highland Estates, such as: conversion of the painted median north of the intersection to a southbound left tum lane meeting County standards; widening of 156th Avenue SE (north of that current proposed improvement); construction of curb returns meeting KCRS 2.1 OA (3 )( a); and, shoulder improvements abutting any widened section. Tf the result of right-of-way constraints at the intersection of SE 136th Street/ 156th Avenue SE includes curb returns that are significantly less than KCRS requirements of35' [KCRS Sec.2.IOA (3)(a)], and right-of-way acquisition by the Applicant is unachievable, review WSDOT Design Manual 910.07(2) and (3) and Figure 910-12 for the consideration of speed change lanes, tapers, or tum lanes, , - • '-./ .... . L01TY401 & L01P0016 May 16, 2002 ,"') '--ou Page 2 and amend traffic impact study to provide recommendation for the provision of a speed change lane for northbound traffic onto SE 136th Street. Provide assessment of pedestrian improvement needs along 160th Avenue SE between the Joint Use Driveway Tract 'H' and the intersection of SE 136th Street/160th Avenue SE. KCDOT has identified the need to provide shoulders on the east side of the roadway in the plat vicinity, to supplement the improvements to be constructed along the plat frontage. R-4 Alternative: Provide assessment of pedestrian improvement needs along 160th Avenue SE. KCDOT has identified the need to provide shoulders on the east side of the roadway in the plat vicinity, to supplement the improvements to be constructed along the full length of the plat frontage. o Environmental Checklist: # 4 b, Plants, Page 7 -Clarify what portion of the site will be cleared for plat development. Will any trees or other existing vegetation ( other than the sensitive area) be retained? # 5 d, Animals, Page 8 -Clarify what yard landscaping will be used to provide habitat opportunities. # 11, Light & Glare, Page 11 -Clarify what street lighting is proposed with plat development. o Other Permit Review: Clarify what other permits and approvals have been requested, and clarify the status of each application. Specifically, has a determination of whether a Section 404 is required & if so has a permit been requested. When submitting the requested information, include copies of the letters requesting information and retain copies for your records. Provide a cover letter, which lists how each item, was addressed. Any clarification or explanation of the submittal can also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN: Karen Scharer, Planner ll, Current Planning Section 900 Oaksdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Tfthe submittal is hand delivered, submit at the address above. Your application is on "hold" from the date of this notice, until the date you are advised that the additional information satisfies this request, or 14 days after the date the information has been provided. You will be notified if the Division determines that the information is insufficient. Please note that the supplemental information required after vesting of a complete application shall not affect the validity of such application. I ; .• L01TY401 & L01P0016 May 16, 2002 Page 3 The deadline for the submittal of the information previously requested is August 16, 2002. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist, which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request, in writing, for consideration by this Department. Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If possible, please submit all of the information in one package. If you have any questions, regarding the additional infomrntion or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-7114 or by e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov. Sincerely, ~~' Current Pl~~t~g Section cc Kim Claussen, Planner III, Current Planning Section, LUSD Bruce Whittaker, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Kris Langley, Supervisor, Traffic & Engineering, KCDOT Laura Casey, Senior Ecologist, Site Development Services, LUSD Application File Howard Stansbury,' U.S. Land Development Associates C/0 Centurian Development Services 22617 gth Drive SE, Bothell, WA 98021 Whittaker, Bruce From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hi Karen; Casey, Laura Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:57 PM Scharer, Karen Whittaker, Bruce L01P0016 Wildife Issues King County does not have regulations specifically protecting wildlife. A policy document, the King County Comprehensive Plan, asks for protection for certain species, primarily in the rural designated part of the County. These protections are implemented through SEPA. None of the species identified in the applicant's Wetland Evalutation and Delineation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation, and Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Plan are required to be protected in the urban designated part of the County where this project lies. There .is no specific information provided in the citizens' documentation to indicate the presence of nesting sites on the proposal property for any protected species. There is no additional wildlife information needed from the applicant at this time. Laura Casey Environmental Scientist Page 1 ·' Whittaker, Bruce From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Casey, Laura Friday, April 05, 2002 12:05 PM Scharer, Karen; Bull, Trishah Whittaker, Bruce; Bottheim, Steve Evendell revisions L01 P0016 Hi Karen and Trishah: I have reviewed the resubmittals for the plat of Evendell, L01P0016. Two alternatives have been submitted, a plat of 70 lots and one of 46 lots. Wetland buffer averaging is no longer a part of this proposal. The 70-lot plat would require construction of SE 136th Street and associated utilities, resulting in a small amount of wetland and buffer fill, and improvements to 160th SE filling a small area of wetland buffer. Mitigation is proposed as setting aside twice the area of impact as additional wetland buffer in the forested NE corner of the property. This is acceptable, along with a requirement for a visual barrier-type fence along the wetland buffer boundary adjacent to the new lots. The 46-lot plat would only require improvements to 160th SE, resulting in fill of a small area of wetland buffer. A new lot is proposed in the NE corner of the site. Mitigation is proposed as setting aside a small forested area south of the proposed new lot, and adjacent to the impact area. This is also acceptable with a requirement for a visual barrier-type fence along the wetland buffer boundary adjacent to the new lots. Conditions on the plat must require evaluation of wetland hydrology prior to engineering plan approval, and maintenance of wetland hydrology following plat construction. If you have any questions, give me a call at 6-7291 or send return email. Laura C. Casey, Environmental Scientist Ill Critical Areas Section, Land Use Services Division King County Dept. of Development & Envr. Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 (206) 296-7291 Page 1 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 April 29, 2002 .Q:wendolyn High 13405 -1581 • Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 Dear Ms. High and Ms. Rollinger: Marsha Rollinger 15646 SE 138 1 • Place Renton, WA 98059 King County Executive Ron Sims asked me to respond directly to your letter of April 5, 2002, expressing your concerns, on behalf of the Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Evendell, as to the Evendell subdivision and rezone proposal. I appreciate your active involvement in your community, and I encourage you to share this response with your neighbors who share an interest in this matter. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) is carefully reviewing the Evendell subdivision and rezone applications for compliance with all applicable development and environmental regulations. I am confident that all issues you raised regarding this proposal will be thoroughly addressed by staff during the preliminary plat and rezone review process, which includes a public hearing before the King County Hearing Examiner. You have been included as a "party-of-record" on the plat and rezone applications. As a party-of-record, you will receive all future public notices regarding this proposal. You may also testify at the public hearing and you may submit additional written comments. If you have any specific questions or need additional information on this proposal, please feel free to contact DDES Planner, Karen Scharer, at (206) 296-7114. I have asked Ms. Scharer and her supervisor, Greg Borba, to be available should you request a meeting with our staff. Thank you for taking the time to write. Ifl can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me again. cc: Ron Sims, King County Executive The Honorable David Irons, King County Council, District 12 Councilmember Greg Borba, Current Planning Supervisor, Land Use Services Division, DDES ATTN: Karen Scharer, Planner II, Land Use Services Division, DOES I C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 Part I: Summary Incomplete Application Though the letter of September 21, 2001 from Karen Scharer to We request that the listed documentation be Howard Stansbury indicates that these applications had been required and placed in the public file of this determined to be complete, the contents of the public files for these application. applications do not support this assertion. KCC 20.20.040 and the DDES documents named Instructions for Subdivision Applications and Instructions for Zone Reclassification Applications lists documentation required for an application to be deemed complete. The following listed documentation does not exist in the public file for this application: Level-One Drainage Analysis Conceptual Drainage Plan Zone Reclassification Application Form Of particular concern to us is the lack of the Zone Reclassification application and the subsection of this document -Zone Reclassification Application Information and Justification Questionnaire . No NPDES Permit Application is in the public file for this application. We request that the NPDES Permit Application be required and placed in the public file of this annlication. Errors There are only 4 WIRA drainage basins in all of King County. This We request that parcel location and context application repeatedly indicates the proposed development is in the data presented in this application be reviewed, Green River Basin instead of correctly referencing the Cedar River the assertions of the developers reassessed Basin. and a report of this analysis be made and Street names are incorrectly recorded. placed in the public file. Multiole macs are markina incorrectlv. Developers' Consistent Failure to meet DOES Deadlines At least three extensions have been requested by the Developers for We request that these applications be denied time to respond to the points and disallowances stated in the DOES in accordance to KCC 20.44.030. Wetland Review. No deadline has been met, including the one af March 2, 2002, designated as Final by ODES. On February 26, 2002, DDES granted an additional extension to April 5, 2002, as specifically requested by the Developers. KCC 20.44.030 states "The manager of the building and land development division may set reasonable deadlines for the submittal of information, studies or documents necessary for, or subsequent to, threshold determinations. Failure to meet such deadlines shall cause the application to be deemed withdrawn, and plans and other data previously submitted for review may be returned to the applicant together with any unexpended portion of the application review fees." Environmental and Wildlife Issues The Environmental Checklist prepared and submitted by the We insist that a Mitigated Threshold. Developers, contains no fewer than four answers of 'Unknown'. Determination of Non-Significance must not The Environmental Checklist question, "List threatened or be submitted nor can it be accepted without endangered species known to be on or near the site" was answered due diligence being done to clarify each of "Unknown', yet in this same application, two Priority Species (black these specific environmental issues listed in tailed deer and ruffed arouse) and a Candidate Soecies lnileated this Resoonse, P::inA? nf 1R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 woodpecker) were identified in the Wildlife Evaluation and Delineation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation, and Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Plan. The parcels under consideration contain two Class II wetlands, yet only a single amphibian species -(hyla regilla) tree frogs -was observed. The Resident Survay's indicate the known and common presence of owls. No attempt to observe nocturnal animals was made. Vegetation Observation Field Data Forms ware submitted with this application. No such Wildlife Field Data Forms ware submitted. The following species have been identified as not only inhabiting King County, but also as likely to be found in environments such as have been determined to exist on the parcels in question. More species of sensitive classification are likely to inhabit these parcels. Carax buxbaumii -State Sensitive - http://www.wa.gov/dnr/htdocs/fr/nhp/rafdesk/fguida/htm/fsp_cabu.ht m Carax comosa -State Sensitive -obligate wetland species (USFWS 1988) - http://www.wa.gov/dnr/htdocs/fr/nhp/rafdask/fguida/htm/fsp_caco.ht m Cimicifuga elata -State Threatened, USFWS Species of Concern - http://www.wa.gov/dnr/htdocs/fr/nhp/rafdask/fguide/htm/fsp_cial.htm Lycopodium dendroideum -State Sensitive - http://www.wa.gov/dnr/htdocs/fr/nhp/refdask/fguide/htm/fsp_lyde.htm Platanthara obtusata -State Sensitive -facultative wetland species (USFWS 1988) - http://www.wa.gov/dnr/htdocs/fr/nhp/refdesk/fguide/htm/fsp_plob.htm Utricularia intermedia -State Sensitive - http://www. wa. gov/dnr/htdocs/fr/nhp/rafdask/fguida/htm/fsp _ utin. htm (Bufo boreas) -Federal Candidate (1999), State Candidate - http://www.pacificbio.org/ESIN/ReptilesAmphibiansJWesternToad/we sterntoad_pg.htm (Ascaphus truei) -Federal Species of Concern, State Species of Concern (WA) - http://www.pacificbio.org/ESIN/ReptilesAmphibians/TailedFrogfTaile dFrogpg.html E-167 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states 'Habitats for species which have been identified as endangered, threatened, or sensitive by the state or federal government shall not be reduced and should be oresarved.' The proposed Wildlife Habitation Recovery Plan indicates that the return of two species of bird is all that is required for fulfillment of the developers' mitigation requirements. The wildlife figures that they have submitted, and which we dispute as incomplete, list 17 observed species, including mammals et. al. -of which at least two are oarticularlv orotected birds. KCC 21A.24.190 states 'Grading and clearing permits are required for any alteration to a sensitive area or its buffer.'. Further, alteration is defined as ' ... any human -induced activity which results or is likely to result in an impact upon the existing condition of a sensitive area ... .' And finally, 'Grading 100 cubic yards or more outside sensitive areas also requires a permit... . .' No mention is made of anv aradina oermits in this annlicatian. DDES Customer Information Bulletin 26 states "As a final consideration, the DDES planner must try to determine whether a project will, to a significant degree, result in any of the fallowing: a. An adverse effect ta environmentallv sensitive or soecial areas We request that a new Environmental Study, including Wildlife Field Data Forms, to specifically address the lack of reported sightings of nocturnal and hydrophilic species, to search for threatened or endangered species known to reside in habitats in King County similar to those extant on the subject parcels, be conducted by a qualified, independent biologist, reported and placed in the public file. We request that an Environmental Impact Study be prepared, submitted and placed in the public file. We request that the highest protection of the sensitive areas and wildlife provided by law be required for these applications to be approved. We request a more stringent Wildlife Habitation Recovery Plan be required as provided by E- 167 of the King County Comprehensive Plan, as cited above. We request that the status of the grading permits by reported and placed in the public file for this application. We assert that both of these consequences wi II result from the project as currently proposed. We renuest that strinaent orotections as P"n" ::Inf 1R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01P0016 and L01TY401 such as the loss or destruction of historic, scientific and cultural provided by law, be required to prevent such resources; parks; prime farmland; wetlands; wild and scenic rivers; destructive outcome. or wilderness; b. An adverse affect on endangered or threatened species or their habitat;" E-173 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states "Stream and We request that the highest protection of the wetland buffer requirements may be increased to protect pecies of sensitive areas and wildlife provided by law be local importance, as listed in this chapter. and their habitats, as required for these applications to be approved. aooropriate. Non Compliance with King County Development and Design Standards We assert that this application provides inadequate planning We request that modifications to this documentation for several design requirements, particularly under application be required to bring this proposal the following points of Recreational Space, Wildlife Habitat into compliance with all current King County Corridors, and Sensitive Areas Protection: Development Standards. Chapter 21A.14 Recreational Space: E. 1-4 F. 1 &2 H. 1 &2 Chapter 21 A.14.260 Wildlife Habitat Corridors Chapter 21A.24 Sensitive Areas Protection (http:l/207.68.162.250/cgi- bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=S7c62ce8c93f98b614dc975bf4a9898b&lat =1015373407 &hm_action=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2emetrokc%2e gov%2fmkcc%2fCode%2f21A14%2d16%2epdf) http:/ /www6. metrokc. gov/case/198p0018%20rpt. doc http://www6.metrokc.gov/case/l98p0024%20rpt.doc httP://www6.metrokc.aov/case/198P0043%20rot.doc U-131 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states "Urban We request that design changes be required to residential neighborhood design should preserve historical and provide increased safety and facility for natural characteristics and neighborhood identity, while preserving pedestrians and bicyclists as well as to privacy, community space, and safety and mobility of pedestrians preserve tha existing conditions of privacy to and bicyclists. adjacent properties. U-133 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states " New urban residential developments should provide recreation space, community facilities and neighborhood circulation for pedestrians -and bicyclists. Approval of an increased zoning density will be inconsistent with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. Privacy will be greatly reduced. The proposed design will result in increased risk to pedestrians and bicyclists. Zoning Piecemeal zoning demands that decisions by made for which careful We request that the regulations -the law - and coordinated consideration by the King County Council is not currently in place be enforced. possible. Zoning and Land Uses issues can not be successfully addressed one at a time. These issues can not be isolated from each other or from other areas. The County Council has wisely made provision for this fact. King County has a Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Plans which are re-evaluated on a regular schedule. The latest Annual Growth Report indicates the successes and challenges that our area faces under these policies. Ron Sims has identified several key issues, of which" ... air quality. stream water quality and habitat conservation continue to be major challenges .... Restoring salmon runs is our laraest environmental challenae. The total P::mA 4 nf 1R ) C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01P0016 and L01TY401 number of natural-spawning adult Chinook in the Cedar River/ Lake Washington watershed reached a new low of 120 in 2000, after a low of 240 in 1999. Overall, the average of runs in the 1990s is about one-half the average during the 1980s. " King County is obligated by state and federal law to enforce wildlife and sensitive area protections. Ron Sims' statements show the need for even greater vigilance in this enforcement than has previously been achieved. U-120 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states "King County We request that the Application for Zone shall not approve proposed zoning changes to increase density Reclassification be denied and that current within the Urban area unless: zoning regulations be maintained and enforced. a. The development will be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhood; " We intend the materials in this Response to demonstrate that the proposed increased zoning density is distinctly incompatible with the established character of the surroundina neiahborhood. Drainage The proposed development is to be located on two parcels We request an evaluation of this situation by completely surrounded by an established neighborhood in which all the King County Community Environmental the houses have individual septic tank systems. We are greatly Health department be conducted and the concerned that the significant increase of impervious surface will findings of that study be placed in the public file dramatically increase runoff and severely adversely affect our for this application. existing systems. This is of even more critical concern to us since there are two Class II wetlands on the subject parcels. Any damage to these systems will certainly negatively affect runoff in our neighborhood. In addition, we are concerned that in the event of severely increased runoff, and any subsequent septic system failure, there would be significant damage to the Cedar River as it is directly downstream from us. Properties to the south of the proposed site of development have a We request an evaluation of this situation by history of damage from the existing drainage infrastructure. No the King County Water and Land Resources mention of the Drainage Complaint History related to these parcels Division be conducted and the findings of that is mentioned in this application. study be placed in the public file for this annlication. -Annexation City of Renton has indicated its intent to supply sanitary sewer We request that this conditional statement be service on the express condition that "the property owner( s) wi II be reviewed, reevaluated and the official findings required to execute a covenant to annex form'. of the relevant municipalities be placed in the http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/63742_nnex25.shtml public file for this application. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/134420701_annex ation15m.html In light of the Washington State Supreme Court ruling of March 14, 2002, we believe that the condition required by City of Renton in order to provide sanitary sewer constitutes a kind of prior restraint and is in direct conflict with this rulina. Traffic City of Renton has approved, or is now processing applications for, We request that a new Traffic Study, 1769 single family residences for the Renton Highlands area alone. specifically considering the known expected DDES's Search and Report on Permit Applications website traffic impacts of the projected new (http:llwww6.metrokc.govlddeslscriptslpermsearch.cfm) indicates development on this hill, as well es the specific approval or current consideration of 254 comparable units in this adverse effects to the function of 156th Ave SE area (Newcastle Communitv Plannina Areal since 2001. in reaards to its utilitv as a desianated Life Line P"n" !i nf 1 R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Pennit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 Approved 2001 http:llwww6.metrokc.govlddes/scripts/permdetail.cfm?permit_no=LO OP0009 -60 units http:llwww6.metrokc.govlddes/scripts/permdetail.cfm?permit_no=LO 1 P0002 -14 units http:llwww6.metrokc.govlddes/scripts/permdetail.cfm?permit_no=L9 9P3008 -49 units Approved 2002 http:llwww6.metrokc.govlddes/scripts/permdetail.cfm?permit_no=LO OP0016 -14 units Under Consideration http:llwww6.metrokc.govlddes/scripts/permdetail.cfm?permit_no=LO OP0023 -5 units http:llwww6.metrokc.govlddes/scripts/permdetail.cfm?permit_no=LO OP0024 -37 units http:llwww6.metrokc.govlddes/scripts/permdetail.cfm?permit_no=LO 1P0016-75 units (this is the Evendell application) This comes to a total of at least 2023 new single family residences. These additions to our community are in no way accounted for in the submitted Traffic Plan for this development. In an area of already severely limited access, largely due to geology and topography, our roads are already pressed for capacity. An additional critical traffic factor to consider is that King County has designated 156th Ave SE as a Life Line Route. As such, traffic impact considerations to this critically designated arterial must be held to a higher degree of scrutiny. Inadequate roads and transportation access to this area are on- going concerns of all the citizens of this neighborhood. The Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council has and continues to expend considerable effort to address this issue. http://www.fourcreeksuac.org/issues.html http://www. fourcreeksuac. org/pasU1 -22-02ER. html The Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council Survey for Summer 2001 very clearly illustrates the extreme dissatisfaction of the citizens of our area with development in general, and its subsequent traffic in definite particular. htto://www.fourcreeksuac.orn/survevresults.html T-316 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states "King County should included nonmotorized transportation when general transportation improvements are made, including road construction, reconstruction, subdivision development and development of new transit systems. T-317 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states "New land use plans, subdivisions and urban planned development proposals should include enhancements to nonmotorized mobility and access. T-318 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states "King County design standards should allow flexibility in selecting, and the authority to require designed features that benefit nonmotorized safety and accessibilitv. T-321 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states 'King County should seek to imorove oedestrian safetv both within residential Route, be conducted, reported and placed in the public file for this application. We request that the highest requirement for provision of facilities for nonmotorized transportation provided by law be required for these applications to be approved. We request that sidewalks be required to ensure the safety of the student residents of the P"'n" fi nf 1 R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 areas and at arterials near pedestrian activity centers such as proposed development. schools, retail centers, concentrations of housing, transit facilities and trails .... To foster safe walking conditions for students, King Countv should continue the School Walkwav Proaram. Aesthetics DDES Customer Information Bulletin 17A refers to KCC 21A.16 and We request that the "appropriate use of says that "Appropriate use of landscaping promotes privacy, creates landscaping" be required in order to preserve and visual and sound buffer, increases aesthetic value and deters the current levels of privacy, to provide erosion." adequate buffers for adjacent properties and to at least maintain the current aesthetic value afforded by the subject parcels in their current state. Local Infrastructure and Level of Service Issues DDES Customer Information Bulletin 17 A refers to KCC 21 A.28 says We request that the statement of school that it "contains adequacy and school concurrency standards ... " adequacy and concurrency be required and No documentation of adequacy and school concurrency for this placed in the public file of this application. annlication is in the oublic file. The Resident Surveys submitted with this Response and the Four We request the Application for Zone Creeks Summer 2001 Survey indicate grave concern by residents of Reclassification be denied due to the current our neighborhood for an adequate level of service from our local inadequate levels of service in our subarea and Fire, Police, and School infrastructure. We consider the current the low priority presently assigned to rectify the levels of service inadequate. The situation resulting from granting existing situation. the requested rezone would be completely unreasonable. The Four Creeks Summer 2001 Survey shows that the top four concerns of all the citizens in our area are DevelopmenUGrowth, TraffidCongestion, Land Use/Zoning, and Environment. The comments detail specific inadequacies in and concerns for the capacity of our neighborhood to support more demands on our local infrastructure. According to the Community Action Strategies -Subarea Priority Ranking Map created by the King County Department of Transportation, our area is in line behind at least four high priority areas and one medium priority area for any retrofit or new capacity improvements. This indicates that our bad situation will continue to . get far worse before there is any attempt at correction. Approving even hiaher densitv zonina is uniustifiable in liaht of these facts. P:>nA 7 nf 1A C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 Part II: Point By Point Review of Application Materials Alternate Plot Map (44 Units) We request that this credit not be allowed. Required Recreational Space Reduction Section IV indicates that the total required Recreational Space is .17160 square feet. However, Tract F, specified as this Recreational Space, is only 8987 square feet. Section V indicates that there is an allowed deduction of area from the required Recreational space equal to the area with in the Stormwater Control Facility. This map indicates that the Stormwater Control Facility is completely enclosed and inaccessible to anyone. No recreational use is afforded bv the Stormwater control facilitv. Environmental Checklist Page 2 (A.7) "Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain." Many of our neighbors have reported that US Land has approached them repeatedly with aggressive offers to buy their property. We consider this answer to be incorrect. Page 4 (1. f.) "There will be the potential for erosion due to the construction of the site. This potential will be mitigated through implementation of an erosion control/water management plan using Best Management Practices." Page 5 (3.a.2.) "Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters?" Page 5 (3.a.6.) "Pollutants associated with typical urban residential developments may eventually make their way to surface waters." Page 6 (3.c.2.) "Pollutants associated with typical urban residential developments may eventually make their way to surface waters." Recent scientific findings demand more stringent consideration of the environmental impacts of residential runoff. Particular concern is warranted for the runoff of lawn chemicals into the two Class II wetlands. Pollutants have been reachina streams and rivers from residential We request that clarification and justification of this statement be required, reported and placed in the public file for this application. We request that the full text and all plans of the referenced Erosion Mitigation Plan be submitted and placed in the public file for this application. We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • What are the actual distances to the Wetland boundaries from construction? • What are the actual distances to the Wetland boundaries from all construction activities such as equipment movement, parking, surface disturbance, materials storage? • What ·specific legislation allows the indicated encroachments? • The question in this Environmental Checklist asks about work within 200 feet. In light of this measure, why have the buffers been requested to be set at 32.5 feet? We request that stringent protection of the wetlands from residential runoff be required. p,.n,, R nf 1 R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 developments through surface waters etc. This site drains directly into the Lower Cedar River Basin that is home to salmon. A recent article was in the Seattle Times showing how pharmaceuticals are even making it into rivers and streams. http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi- bin/texis. cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=pollute 13&date=20020313&qu erv=rivers Page 7 (4. b.) "What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?" Page 7 (4. c.) "List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site" Two Priority Species (black tailed deer and ruffed grouse) and a Candidate Species (pileated woodpecker) were identified in the Wildlife Evaluation and Delineation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation, and Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Plan. Page 7 (4. d.) "Proposed ... measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the site, if any" Page 7 (5. a.) "Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site:" The Resident Surveys submitted with this Response indicate a very rich wildlife community in and around the subject parcels. No nocturnal studies were attempted for this application and the only amphibians found were tree frogs. We assert that the wildlife studies submitted for this application are incomplete and grossly inadequate. We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • What percentage of vegetation and sod is expected to be removed? • To what depth will the surface be 'stripped'? • What are the King County specified limitations to this? • Why are no Clearing and Grading permits present in the public file for these aoolications? We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • What research was conducted to satisfy this question? • What justification is the there for the answer given -"Unknown"? • What specific legislation allows the indicated answer to be adequate? • Why is conflicting data listed elsewhere in this annlication? We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • What is the exact definition of "typical Pacific Northwest plantings" given as the answer to this question? • What is the specific applicability to the mitigation of the disruption and destruction of the existing habitats of Conifer Upland Forest, Persistent Lowland Shrub and Deciduous Forested Wetland? We request that a new Environmental Study, including Wildlife Field Data Forms, to specifically address the lack of reported sightings of nocturnal and hydrophilic species, to search for threatened or endangered species known to reside in habitats in King County similar to those extant on the subject parcels, be conducted by a qualified, independent biologist, reported and placed in the public file. We request that a Mitigated Threshold · Determination of Non-Significance must not be submitted nor can it be accepted without due diligence being done to clarify each of these soecific environmental issues. P"nA Cl nf 1R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 Page 8 (5. b.) We request that answers to the following "List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the questions be required and placed in the public site" file for this application. • What research was conducted to satisfy this question? • What justification is the there for the answer given -"Unknown'? • What specific legislation allows the indicated answer to be adequate? • Why is conflicting data listed elsewhere in this application? Two Priority Species (black tailed deer and ruffed grouse) and a Candidate Species (pileated woodpecker) were identified in the Wildlife Evaluation and Delineation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation, and Compensatory Wetland Mitiaation Plan. Page 8 (5. c.) We request that answers to the following "Is the site part of a migration route?" questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • What research was conducted to satisfy this question? • What justification is the there for the answer given -"Unknown"? • What specific legislation allows the indicated answer to be adeauate? Page 8 (5. d.) We request that answer ta the following "Proposed ... measures to preserve or enhance wildlife at the site, if question be required and placed in the public any" file for this application. • What specific activities will address and redress the loss and disruption of established habitat and wildlife corridors? Page 8 (6.b.) We request that answer ta the fallowing "Land clearing may improve the solar access by adjoining question be required and placed in the public properties.' file for thi~ application. • What specific activities will address and redress the loss and disruption of established habitat and wildlife corridors? Page 9 (7. b.2.) We request that answers to the following "What types and level of noise would be created by and associated questions be required and placed in the public with the project ... ?' file for this application. The stated hours of construction activity are completely and totally • What specific regulations allow the hours unacceptable to the residents of this neighborhood. listed, 7am to 10pm Monday through Saturday, for construction in a residential neighborhood? • What options are available for further restrictions for the protection of the neiahbors and communitv? Page 9 (8. b.) We request that answers to the following "Has the site been used for agriculture?" questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • What research was conducted to satisfv this PAnA 1() nf 1 R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01P0016 and L01TY401 question? 0 What justification is the there for the answer given -"Unknown"? 0 What specific legislation allows the indicated answer to be adeauate? Page 10 (8. h.) We request that answer to the following "Has any part of the site been classified as an ·environmentally question be required and placed in the public sensitive area"? file for this application. 0 Does not a designation of Class II Wetland qualify as an "environmentally sensitive area"? Page 10 (8. I.) We assert that the proposed rezone is directly "The proposal complies with current comprehensive plans and is in and distinctly incompatible with the established character with future development proximate to the site." character of our neighborhood. The question is "Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is We request that the application for Rezone be compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any" denied. We assert the importance of the "existing" portion of this question. Within a two block radius of the subject parcels we have counted flocks of ducks, geese, and goats as well as 20 horses, 6 cows, 2 llamas, and at least 3 roosts of chickens. This proposed development site is completely surrounded by an existing well established neiohborhood with a definite rural flavor. Page 11 (10.b.) We request that significant landscape buffers "Views over or inward to the project site will be altered from the be required on all boundaries to adjacent forest and pasture to modern. well designed homes and landscaped properties. yards." The neighbors to these parcels consider the existing views as extremely valuable. Some property owners have made substantial investments to their own orooerties to eniov these views. Page 11 (10. b. and c.) We request that answers to the following "The project proposes 7 4 new, modern, well-designed homes and questions be required and placed in the public landscaped yards." file for this application. "What views in the immediate vicinity will be altered or obstructed?' "Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any?" 0 What specific protections will undertaken to preserve views currently actively enjoyed by neighbors? 0 Some neighbors have made investments to specifically enjoy these views. 0 What compensation should they expect to offset this loss? 0 Elsewhere in this application, the number of proposed new homes is more commonly expressed as 75. What is the real number? Page 11 (11.a. and 11.c) We request that lighting covenants be required "Light and Glare" of all new residents. The relative lack of light pollution of any kind in this neighborhood is a very significant aesthetic issue for current residents. We do not We request that light pollution mitigation be have streetliohts. reouired in the annroved buildino olans. Page 11 (12.b) We request that light pollution mitigation and "Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses" adequate habitat protections be required in the approved building plans. Birdwatching and stargazing will be devastated. These activities are greatly enjoyed by the owners of the surrounding properties. The abilitv to enoaoe in these recreational pursuits are kev indicators of P:anA 11 nf 1A C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 the character of our neiahborhood. Page 11 (12. c.) We request that answers to the following "Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation ... " questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. The area of proposed recreational space reported recorded here matches neither the initial nor the alternate plat proposal. 0 What is the real proposed area for recreational space? 0 Why are these numbers inconsistently reported? Page 12 (14. a.) We request that answers to the following "Identify public streets and highways serving this site, and describe questions be required and placed in the public proposed access to the existing street systems ... " file for this application. 0 What impact will there be to neighbors residing on the currently dead end 158th Ave SE? 0 What impact will there be to the utility of 156th Ave SE in its capacity of King County Life Line Route? 0 Why does the Traffic Report in this application neglect to consider the impending impact of greater than 2000 single family residences currently.planned for this hill? Page 12 (16.a.) We request that this conditional statement be 'Circle utilities currently available at the site" reviewed, reevaluated and the official findings of the relevant municipalities be placed in the Sanitary sewer is NOT currently available. public file for this application. In light of the Washington State Supreme Court ruling of March 14, 2002, we assert that the condition required by City of Renton constitutes a kind of orior restraint. Page 13 (15. a. and b.) We request that answers to the following "Would the project result in an increased need for public services ... ?'' questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. The Resident Surveys submitted with this Response indicate a significant concern that our local services will be severely taxed by 0 Who will be responsible for these increased the proposed development. costs1 0 What mechanisms for impact fees and/or comparable remedies can be required of the developer and/or eventual homeowners? 0 Will these costs fall to existing citizens? 0 What recourse do existing residents have to onnose such unfair financial burdens? Plat of Evendell -Wetland Review Laura Casey Senior Ecologist Site Development Services Paragraph 3 We request that answer to the following 'Construction of SE 136th Street for access to this property would fill question be required and placed in the public 200 square feet of wetland and encroach on about 4600 square feet file for this application. of buffer. This impact could potentially be minimized by reducing the width of the required road improvements and by using construction 0 What specific portions of the submitted Plat techniques to limit fill in the wetland." Proposals indicate these actions will be undertaken? Paragraph 4 We request that the lot boundaries be required 'This is not an 'unavoidable intrusion' into the buffer as stated in the to be redrawn. PAm> 1? nf 1R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01P0016 and L01TY401 Wetland Report. It can easily be avoided by redrawing the lot boundaries to provide the minimum 50 foot buffer. Buffer averaging can only be permitted when it provides "additional protection .. ." This intrusion into the buffer cannot be allowed under existing reaulations. Wildlife Evaluation and Deliniation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation, and Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Plan Executive Summary page 2 paragraph 2 We request that answer to the following "Buffer averaging will be used ... Such averaging will provide question be required and placed in the public additional protection to wetlands and enhance the wetland's file for this application. function" • What are the specific justifications for the ' ... improvements in the existing right-of-way ... will require the request to allow this extreme degree of unavoidable filling of the northern 200 square feet of Wetland A and buffer averaging? the reduction of the buffer associated with this area of the wetland." The Plat of Evendell -Wetland Review specifically refutes these assertions and clearly states alternatives -this is not an "unavoidable intrusion". Page 2 State of Washington Stream Catalog We request that parcel location and context "This mapping resource did identify the Green River to the south of data presented in this application be reviewed, the Project site." the assertions of the developers reassessed and a report of this analysis be made and The site is not in, adjacent to nor is it in any way otherwise placed in the public file. associated with the Green River Basin. This site in part of the Cedar River Basin system. Page 3 Aerial Photo Analysis We request that parcel location and context "This deciduous forest/shrub community appeared to continue offsite data presented in this application be reviewed, to the south until reaching the top of the slope leading in the Green the assertions of the developers reassessed River Valley.' and a report of this analysis be made and placed in the public file. The site is not in, adjacent to nor is it in any way otherwise associated with the Green River Basin. This site in part of the Cedar We request that protection for this corridor River Basin system. function be required. We assert that this statement indicates the vital wildlife corridor utility - of these olots. Page 4 Field Observation We request that answer to the following . question be required and placed in the public file for this application. • No mention is made of mycological studies . Are anv such data reauired? Page 8 Onsite Wetland Evaluation -Water Quality Benefits We request that answers to the following 'The primary water quality benefit provided by this wetland appeared questions be required and placed in the public to be a very limited amount of biofiltration of surface stormwater." file for this application. • What measurements were taken? 0 What pollutants and concentrations of them were identified on the input side? the output? • What specific benefit is provided for the livestock runoff produced by the existing horse oasture on 158th Avenue SE? Paae 9 Wildlife Studv Methods oaraaraoh 1 We reauest that answer to the followina P"nA 1::1 nf 1A C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01P0016 and L01TY401 "This assessment included both early morning and late afternoon observations." Page 9 Wildlife Study Methods paragraph 2 "These more mobile species may depend more upon adjacent habitat for more critical habitat needs such as nesting and cover from predators." "It is unlikely based upon the existing site conditions. coupled with adjacent land uses. that species which require large areas of undisturbed habitat would exist onsite." We assert that there is no adjacent habitat that is suitable for the purposes stated. Black tailed deer and coyotes are listed in the observed species lists. While neither of these species is likely to be strictly confined to these parcels for their complete lifecycles, it can be argued that movement through these parcels along the aforementioned forested corridor to the Cedar River valley is likely necessary for their continued existence. Page 1 O Plant and Animal Species Observations This section lists a single amphibian (tree frog), but no reptile or macro invertebrates. Yet a significant area of these parcels is identified as a Class II wetland. We assert that this data is incomplete. Page 11 Plant and Animal Species Observations paragraph 2 "These stumps and snags appeared well utilized as feeding areas by a wide variety of avian species, particularly hairy woodpeckers, creepers and Northern flicker. A few of these snags also exhibited a limited use by pileated woodpecker (Drpocopus pileatus)." No fewer than four very large dead trees are visible from the west side of the subject parcels, the 160th Ave SE side. Two are right next to the Proposed Land Use sign, which display extensive signs of woodpecker utilization. At least one of these sites is large enough to accommodate an owl or other bird of prey. Please see the attached ohotos. Page 12 Movement Corridors "Wetland A also appeared to serve as a movement corridor for a wide variety of wildlife species." Wildlife corridors have been identified by KCC 21A.14.260 and KCC 21A.14.270 for specific protection in King County's commitment to environmental protection. htto://www.metrokc.oov/MKCC/Code/21A14-16.odf Page 12 Priority Species "Two wildlife species identified by the State of Washington as "Priority Species· were observed onsite during the assessment... Black tailed deer and ruffed grouse ... The project site may also provide habitat for ... morning dove and band-tailed pigeon." question be required and placed in the public file for this application. • What consideration of nocturnal species is reouired? We request specific documentation be required to support this assertion of the developers. We request that protection for this corridor function be required. We request that a new Environmental Study, including Wildlife Field Data Forms, to specifically address the lack of reported sightings of nocturnal and hydrophilic species, to search for threatened or endangered species known to reside in habitats in King County similar to those extant on the subject parcels, be conducted by a qualified, independent biolnnist. reoorted and olaced in the oublic file. We request specific investigation of these dead trees, by a qualified independent biologist, to determine the specific wildlife utilization. We request requirement that this corridor's function be maintained intact. We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • What specific protections are in place for these creatures? • Bv what means will these nrotections be P::.nA 1.d nf 1R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01P0016 and L01TY401 enforced? Page 12 State Candidate Species We request that answers to the following "A single "State Candidate" species -the pileated woodpecker -questions be required and placed in the public was observed ... • file for this application . 0 What specific protections are in place for these creatures? 0 By what means wi II these protections be enforced? Page 13 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers -Section 404 We request that answers to the following "For the purposes of Section 404 permitting the Corps makes the questions be required and placed in the public final determination as to whether an area meets wetland definition file for this application. and would be subject to regulation under the Corps program.• 0 Has application been filed for the Corps determination of jurisdiction? 0 If so, what is the current status of the application. 0 If not so whv not? Page 14 Roadway Improvements We request that the lot boundaries must be Points 1, 2 and 4 list conditions required for King County to allow a redrawn. This intrusion into the buffer cannot be roadway to cross a wetland or associated buffer. allowed under existing regulations. The Plat of Evendell -Wetland Review specifically indicates several factors which will not allow the requested intrusions into the wetland and its buffer zones. Page 15 Selected Action Plan paragraph 2 We request that the lot boundaries be required "Through averaging, the buffer on the west side of the wetland will to be redrawn. be reduced to 32.5 feet... Through buffer averaging these unavoidable intrusions into the standard buffer areas will be fully compensated ... • 32.5 feet is exactly the minimum allowed by law -65% of the mandated value. This allows zero margin of error. Additionally, the statement regarding "unavoidable intrusion· is erroneously asserted. The Plat of Evendell -Wetland Review specifically states: "This is not an "unavoidable intrusion· into the buffer as stated in the Wetland Report. It can easily be avoided by redrawing the lot boundaries to provide the minimum 50 foot buffer. Buffer averaging . can only be permitted when it provides "additional protection .. ." This intrusion into the buffer cannot be allowed under existing reoulations. Page 15 Selected Action Plan paragraph 3 We request that this extension of 158th Avenue " ... extending the existing 158th Avenue South roadway ... . SE be denied . The road name is 158th Avenue Southeast, and as the Resident We request that parcel location and context Surveys submitted with this Response indicate, the extension is data presented in this application be reviewed, strongly opposed by the neighbors. the assertions of the developers reassessed and a report of this analysis be made and olaced in the oublic file. Page 16 Selected Action Plan paragraph 3 We request that the lot boundaries be required " ... these unavoidable intrusions into the wetland and standard buffer to be redrawn. areas will be fully compensated ...... " The Plat of Evendell -Wetland Review specifically states: "This is not an "unavoidable intrusion· into the buffer as stated in the Wetland Report. It can easily be avoided by redrawing the lot boundaries to provide the minimum 50 foot buffer. Buffer averaaino P"nA 1/; nf 1A C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01P0016 and L01TY401 can only be permitted when it provides "additional protection .. ." This intrusion into the buffer cannot be allowed under existing reaulations. Page 16 Elements of the Compensatory Mitigation Plan paragraph 2 " ... wetland area to be unavoidably modified ... As compensation for this unavoidable impact..." The Plat of Evendell -Wetland Review specifically states: 'This is not an 'unavoidable intrusion' into the buffer as stated in the Wetland Report. It can easily be avoided by redrawing the lot boundaries to provide the minimum 50 foot buffer. Buffer averaging can only be permitted when it provides "additional protection .. .' This intrusion into the buffer cannot be allowed under existing reaulations. Page 18 Description of the Compensatory Mitigation Program 8. "The cuter boundary of the wetland buffer will be marked and fenced to limit intrusion into these areas.' Page 19 Objective B. Performance Criteria (first) Page 19 Objective B. Performance Criteria (second) "The compensatory mitigation area will be used for cover by at least two species of passerine birds common to the area within five years of completion of construction of the mitigation area.' The record of observed species stated in this application lists seventeen different species -including 2 Priority Species and 1 Candidate Species. These Performance Criteria list requirements for birds only. We find these Perfonnance Criteria entirely inadequate and wholly uniustifiable Page 20 paragraph 2 'Primary features offered by the selected mitigation plan includes ... areater diversitv of plant species and plant associations. We request that the lot boundaries be required to be redrawn. We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • Will any portion of the area to be fenced and protected from intrusion be used in the calculation of stormwater control facilities being used to justify the application for reduction of required Recreational Space? We assert that this is not a suitable substitution of recreational space. We request that any such request for recreational space substitution be denied. We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. o What is the current inventory of comparable habitat characteristics as those described here? • What'percentage of the current figure are the proposed aggregated habitat features? • What percentage is mandated by law? • What percentage is required to provide habitat for the creatures to be displaced by construction? We request that answer to the following question be required and placed in the public file for this application. 0 What mitigation is required for mammals, amphibians, reptiles and plants? We request that answer to the following question be required and placed in the public file for this aoolication. P::mR 1n nf 1R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01P0016 and L01TY401 greater diversity of wildlife habitats." 0 What exact habitat designations will exist This does not address the loss of currently existing habitat. The on these parcels after construction? current habitats, according to this very report, include Conifer Upland Forest Persistent Lowland Shrub and Deciduous Forested Wetland. Page 20 Summary Table of Wetland Functional Benefits We request that answers to the following "Establishment of a diverse plant community and habitat features questions be required and placed in the public within the wetland and buffer areas.' file for this application. This does not address the loss of currently existing habitat. The 0 What exact habitat designations will exist current habitats, according to this very report, include Conifer Upland on these parcels after construction? Forest, Persistent Lowland Shrub and Deciduous Forested Wetland. 0 What wholly new designations will exist after construction? Page 20 Selected Plant Communities We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. 0 Which of these species are native species? 0 Which are specifically applicable to the mitigation of the disruption and destruction of the existing habitats of Conifer Upland Forest, Persistent Lowland Shrub and Deciduous Forested Wetland? Page 21 Construction Inspection We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. 0 Who has jurisdictional oversight of this responsibility? 0 What are the options for community review? 0 What will be the period of inspection by a county official? 0 What are the consequences for failure to meet reauirements? Page 22 Construction Sequence We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public All tasks listed in this table are shown with dates indicating that all file for this application. actions have been completed already. . 0 Where did these datas come from? 0 How many of such comparable errors are allowed in an annlication to be annroved? Page 24 Vegetation Monitoring Sequencing We request that answers to the following questions ba required and placed in the public Again, incorrect dates are listed. file for this application. 0 Where did thasa dates come from? 0 How many of such comparable errors are allowed in an aoolication to be annroved? Page 27 Figures We request that parcel location and context Figura 1 Site Vicinity data presented in this application be reviewed, the assertions of the developers reassessed The circle indicating the secondary parcel is drawn on the east side and a report of this analysis be made and of the primary parcel. In reality, the secondary parcel is on the west placed in the public file. side of the primarv oarcel. Page 29 Appendix A We request that a new Environmental Study, Field Data Forms including Wildlife Field Data Forms, to specifically address the lack of reported Field data is oresented for ve=tation onlv. siohtinas of nocturnal and hvdroohilic species P"n" 17 nf 1R REPORT OF FOUR CREEKS UAC SURVEY, SUMMER 2001 http://www.fourcreeksuac.org/surveyresults.html Prepared by Kate Kaluzny September 200 I Describe your community: A good place to live: 29 (47.5%). An excellent place to live: 22 (36.1%). Prefer to live somewhere else: 4 (6.6%). Other (Please elaborate): 4 (6.6%). *We would like to live farther from SE 128th because it is like an interstate. *The quality of life has been going downhill for the last J years. *I loved it in 1993, but too many new developments and getting too much traffic. *Not as good as it was before growth of the area. No Response: 2 (3.3%). Concerns: 12.5% Development/Growth 11.9% Traffic/Congestion 8.0"/o Land Use/Zoning 7. O"/o Environment 2.1% Too much environmental regulation 4. 6% Too little environmental regulation .3% Other: "Keep more open spaces." 6.9%Roads 5.5% Taxes 4. 9% Building Regulations 4.0% Crime J .5% Education 3.4% Speeding/Other Traffic Violation 3.2% Endangered Species Act 3.1% Parks 2.6% Public Transit 2.6% Law Enforcement 2.5% Sewer/Septic 2.1 % Surface Water Management 2.0% Landfill 2.0"/o Churches/Schools in Rural Area I. 6% Drug Abuse/ Alcoholism 1.3% Recreational Facilities/Programs 1.3% Library I . 0% Government Services 1.0% Housing I . O"lo Composting Company .8% Discrimination on the basis ofrace or ethnicity .1% Housing .3% Employment .3% Other: "and influence" .8% Domestic Violence .7%RTA . 7% Services/Housing for the Elderly . 7% Mental Illness .3% Services/Housing for the Disabled 1.8% Other Concerns : .3% "Noise from gun cJub." .3% "Ability to keep horse (i.e., rural lifestyle) and access to public trails (i.e., concern that some trails are no longer available for horse use)." (14500 block of Cedar Grove Rd.) .3% "SE Bypass (I'm against) and effect on Issaquah-Hobart area." (16200 block oflssaquah-Hobart Rd.) .3% "Continuing annexations into City of Renton should stop." .3% "Need to address the litter problem along 128th--organize neighborhood clean-up days--pick up litter, etc." .2% "Air quality: Would like to see permanent county-wide burn ban. Isn~ the air grand this summer." (13700 block of240th Ave. S.E) .2% "Need mandatory garbage collection." NOTE the concerns were scored as follows: There were 30 general areas of concern. A concern ranked #1 was given 30 points, #2 29 points, etc. If one merely placed X's by concerns, the X's were counted and the average point value assigned to each. For example, if there were three concerns X'd, each was given 29 points. Point values were added up for each concern, and all of the points for all concerns were totaled. Then the total points for each concern were calculated as the percentage of the total points. Comments received in response to summer 2001 survey. Development/Growth & Land Use/Zoning *There should be a re-evaluation of the Growth Management Act--urban housing is becoming too dense, rural housing too sparse, and too much land is set aside for no development. (Lake Kathleen area) *Homes are built too close together--no room for runoff, privacy, natural buffers. Homes should be zoned to require more open space. A home should take up less than 1/3 of the property. (Maple Heights) •rm concerned about the impact on my neighborhood and the Four Creeks area that will come from all of the development and new land use that is currently taking place, especially along 128th St. (O'Donnell precinct) *Development seems not to take into account our ability to handle the added traffic, resulting in unacceptable congestion. *The dense growth of high density housing on 128th and on 900 near Tibbetts. What a horrible way to grow! (Near 196th and 134th) *I despise the growth along 128th. I am a 12-1/2 year resident, near Maywood Middle School and am stricken with grief due to what they are doing to our woods. More buildings, more traffic. (14300 block of 165th Place) *No restriction. *This used to be a quiet place with quick, easy access to anywhere. Now it is a congestion nightmare, and hundreds of cars drive by at 60 mph on my 35 mph road. I see deer standing in a clearing (construction) and it breaks my heart. (148th Ave. S.E.) *Renton must be stopped! (Lake Kathleen area) *Development is allowed by government to outstrip the carrying capacity of roads & Legislature has failed to provide and specify major road construction. (12300 block of206th Place) *Growth: No. *I think that it is unfair that the density/growth in our Area is limited to only one side of 128th. There is a mini-subdivision grandfathered in on 176th Ave. S.E. and yet I can~ build a small house on my land on 174th (over 1000 square feet) or subdivide. (12600 block of 174th Ave. S.E.) *I Jive on Tiger Mountain and I don't want to see it end up crowded like the Plateau. (Tiger Mountain) *Too much! Have lost our rural existence! (Briarwood South/Skyfire Ridge) *My biggest concern is the clear cutting for housing developments on 128th S.E., the change in density with incorporation, and the fear of even more land being incorporated by Renton. There is no plan for the huge increase in growth. (Valencia precinct) *Land use restrictions should be eased. I want higher density on Tiger Mountain, not a bunch of 5-acre tracts for millionaires. (13100 block of250th Place) *Too much development. (Mirrormont) *The city limits are moving too far. (Briarwood) *My concern is for careless growth of Highlands area and accompanying issues of crime, traffic, and infrastructure in local community. (Briar Hill) *I'm concerned about losing the precious small rural character of the Issaquah-Hobart Road_ corridor to Mirrormont, road expansion, and traffic. (16200 block oflssaquah-Hobart Rd.) *Seek to bring in solid services and businesses into our area. (13200 block of 180th Ave. S.E.) *Whether it is zoning, growth, parks or other areas on your list, I'm concerned about the restrictions placed on home owners and/or how the rural lifestyle is being pushed out farther. (14500 block of Cedar Grove Rd.) *There should be growth management plans rather than growth stifling plans. (Mirrormont) •1 see too much housing development and fear Renton will continue annexing land until we have another city, or Issaquah. (Maple Hills) *My wife and I moved here from Bellevue for some open space. We are in a 5-acre zoning area. Up the street, land is being cleared .. .in order to build several houses. They have covered over wetlands according to our neighbor and we want to make sure they can rightfully construct all these houses. ( I 50's blocks of S.E. I I 6th) Development/Growth & Land Use/Zoning (cont'd) • As I was born in Seattle, raised on Cougar Mountain, and have lived in my current house for over 8 years, located in the Briarwood area, east of Renton, I feel I have the right to voice my concerns about the way this area is being developed. My children attend Issaquah Schools, and for that I am grateful. It was a little chilling though when I took my children on a kindergarten bus ride and the organizers called out all the elementary schools im the district (The children raised their hands when their school was called.). I think I heard at least 20 schools called and I thought back to when I attended elementary school in Issaquah. I believe there were about 5. I feel so sad when I drive down Cemetery Road these days. Each week, it seems, there is a new clearing for a new development. Can't imagine what traffic will be like soon--especially when developers take a lane for their own use, as I have seen in the past. I took my kids to Dairy Queen about a year ago (off Duvall and 128th) and my son started to cry as we were in the drive-through. I asked what was wrong and he said he missed the trees. That area is now home to those marvelous storage units, probably for all those new residents with crammed houses or apartments. I have deer running through my yard more lately--they have nowhere else to go. When and where is the cap? When is it enough? I understand that when my own house was being built--over 30 years ago--someone probably complained, if there was anyone around to complain. This place was pretty barren back then. Thanks for letting me ramble on about something so important to me and my family. P.S. Do developers pay a certain amount toward new schools? If not, they should! (Briarwood) Traffic/Congestion/Roads *S.R. 900 needs to be straightened and widened to accommodate the current traffic and future growth. This roadway is never addressed by the county or state-why not? (Hi-Valley) *Main roads need two lanes both ways, lanes added--Coal Creek Parkway. More thru roads. (146th Place S.E.) *Congestion is hampering economic growth. (18900 block of S.E. 133rd Place) *If large areas are made into houses (as near Newport), another arterial should be part of the builder's responsibility, not just dumping cars on to small back roads. (14400 block of Renton-Issaquah Road) *Large developments should pay most costs to upgrade road system to handle their increase in traffic volume. *There is lots of development on S.E. !28th St. I'm concerned about it becoming congested, traffic-wise. ( 16400 block of S.E. 135th) *What effect will the new developments have! (13300 block of 191 st Place) *We are a substitute for 405. I'm appalled the Legislature cannot agree to a plan. (20500 block of S.E. 136th) *Issaquah-Hobart Road has become very congested (Widen it?). (Tiger Mountain) *Since we don't have any sidewalks or street lights, it seems dangerous to walk or bike ride on my road. It would be nice if one shoulder was paved and marked as a bike lane. (Tiger Mountain) *Keep Maple hills a "no outlet" neighborhood. Prevent a connector to Maple Valley. Thanks! (Maple Hills) *Build the new road to the new Sunset interchange in Issaquah immediately--traffic on Issaquah-Hobart Road is impossible. ( 13100 block of250th Place) *Because too much building going on. (Briarwood South/Skyfire Ridge) *Too much traffic and congestion. (Mirrorrnont) *Roads are good, no complaint. It's that they trimmed each side of road 128th, got to 196th and stopped. There's a curve after our driveway and so much brush on side ofroad, can't see the cars coming down, just to get in our driveway, which is on the left side. Wouldn't be too bad ifwe didn't have all the speeders on our road .. (13400 block of 196th Ave. S.E.) *Need more roads; wide roads. (Mirrorrnont) *Excess traffic #1 problem. I've stopped commuting to Seattle due to this and am considering relocation due to it. Increase in growth in this area without adequate road infrastructure is disturbing. (Off of Cedar Grove Road) *Road maintenance and roadside maintenance ( cutting growth back from roads) and ditch maintenance. (Briarwood) *School traffic. (Briarwood, 175th Ave. S.E.) *Issaquah-Hobart Road inadequate for the amount of traffic. (15600 block of263rd) *Maintenance of roads and with all the building in surrounding areas. Can our small roads handle the volume? (20500 block of S.E. 136th St.) *Roads should be wider to handle all the people coming to live here. (Mirrorrnont) *900 from May Valley Road to 1-90 is backed up horribly during rush hours. It is going to get even worse with all the new development going on. Widening the road just south of Newport Way on 900 is a joke if they think that will alleviate the congestion when all 1,800 new homes in East Cougar Mountain are occupied! (Sunset Valley Farms) *The traffic congestion is a by-product of the housing development. Many of our roads are being congested past acceptable limits, especially with trucks. (Maple Hills) *Too much. Too many people using Issaquah as a "through way." Too many people living and working in Issaquah. Don't want any more construction, commercial or residential. (Mirrorrnont) *Our main concern is 128th. With all the new developments, it can tum into another 99. Accidents will get worse--people drive too fast and just too many damn cars. (13100 block, 158th Ave. S.E.) Environment *This environment is so fragile--! worry that cynicism and inattention will endanger it. (20500 block ofS.E. 136th) *Replace bridge just off Maple Valley Highway on 149th Ave. S.E. over Cedar River. Due over 3 years, needed over 30. (14000's of 171st Ave. S.E.) *Loss of native habitat & environmental degradation. (Mirrormont) *Too many derelict cars and equipment setting around, spoiling the naturalness of the landscape. Clotheslines in front yards with clothing hanging from them. People don't take care of the upkeep of their property. Toonerville territory. (Coalfield-May Valley) *Keep more green spaces. (13100 block, 158th Ave. S.E.) *God said we could use this world, not kill it. (14600 block, 161st. Ave. S.E.) Taxes *Need to hold the line on increased taxes, avoid our elderly being taxed out of their homes. (13200 block of 180th Ave. S.E.) *Too high; too much waste--e.g., daycare pay subsidies. (Lake KatWeen area) *I find them very high compared to what I was paying in Bellevue. (16400 block ofS.E. 135th) *Legislators have not used taxes wisely for 30 years in their failure to build roads. (12300 block of206th Place) *Too high. Unincorporated, "rural"; I am being charged like urban. We pay too much. Why are we paying for the rest of these at the county level? Should be state, except real local concerns, like crime. I just lost my husband and can't afford to live here because property taxes are exorbitant. I have been re-zoned due to Growth Management Act and my house sits on an 8-acre "lot." I will be re- buying my land every 4 years! (Above Hi-Valley) *Taxes will always be too high. (20500 block ofS.E. 136th St.) *Always go up. (14600 block, 161st. Ave. S.E.) *Consistently rising every year, services we receive don~ seem to matter re what we're paying. (Lake Kathleen area) Building Regulations *Building permit process is too costly, takes too long. (18900 block ofS.E. 133rd Place) *Lack of. Crime *I picked crime as number I because we have been vandalized and stolen from 2 times and we've only lived in our house for less than 2 years. (12800 block 162nd Ave. S.E.) *So far, so good. (14000's of171st Ave. S.E.) *Bad kids with irresponsible parents in Mirrormont. (Mirrormont) Education *The best education we can afford for the next generation. *Classroom size is too large (more teachers). (Tiger Mountain) *The Issaquah School District and diving into the humanistic approach of teaching, rather than sticking to teaching on the emphasis of academics. I prefer they focus on academics and making sure students learn what is right academically, rather than trying to build self- esteem, with any answer being approved as long as the student tried. (Maple Hills) Speeding, etc. *I picked speeding as number 2 because we live on the corner of 162nd S.E. and S.E. I 28th but it feels like I live next to a raceway. (12800 block 162nd Ave. S.E.) *Speeding on Tiger Mountain Road. (25400's block ofS.E. 138th) *Speeding is terrible on 196th. Limit is 30 mph, few obey that. Goes on all day. Children will be going to school soon. My granddaughter has to walk on the side of the road, then cross to bus stop. Also, other kids in the neighborhood. I wait to collect my mail if cars are coming down the hill. (13400 block of 196th Ave. S.E.) *Speeding on rural streets mostly by high school students. *May Valley Road sometimes feels like a race track. (20500 block ofS.E. 136th St.) *Too many times kids race down our 25 mph street. (Licorice Fern) *More police presence on 128th, especially near "Issaquah-Lake McDonald" Y. Cars travelling at high speeds constantly ignore 35 mph limit at intersection. (Near Lake McDonald) *Going too fast on May Valley Road. Also concerned about stupid things such as smashing trash cans and just general stuff plus mail theft. (Hi-Valley) Endangered Species Act *Endangered Species--out ofbalance--too strict, too controlled. (146th Place S.E.) *Get the bridge in. (14000's of 171st Ave. S.E.) *Money spent to comply with ESA seems like, in large part, a big boondoggle. (Lake Kathleen area) Parks *With all the housing development going on along N.E. 4th/128th, I'm concerned about connecting green space parks. I want to be able to take my children on their bikes and safely move from my home to a designated point (like a library or park or grocery store. I hate having to rely on my car to safely get places with my family. (Briarwood) *I don't think we have any! (Tiger Mountain) *Not enough ball fields!!. (Briarwood South/Skyfire Ridge) Public Transit *I'm worried that bus service is getting worse. I have few options to driving if! miss the 111 bus or need midday or evening service. Park 'n' Ride lots for day-long routes are too full (I used to park on the street near the S. Bellevue Park 'n' Ride, can't now, it's restricted.). (13300 block of 191st Place) *We need public transit. (25400's block of S.E. 138th) * An area transit system is a must to reduce traffic problems--but it must be prompt and reach many places easily to be usable. Europe has a great system. (Maple Hills) *No Metro on Issaquah-Hobart Road. *Tell your legislator to raise the gas tax to fund a mass transit system. It is the single most important issue we face now and will be in the future. Recreational facilities/programs * Availability advertised. Library *Great. (14600 block, 161st. Ave. S.E.) Law Enforcement *Police officers are never seen patrolling in my area. In the year I have lived here, I've seen 2 officers on May Valley Road. (20500 block ofS.E. 136th St.) *I believe we need to continue to maintain a strong law enforcement presence in our neighborhoods. (13200 block of 180th Ave. S.E.) *Excellent. (14600 block, 161st. Ave. S.E.) Sewer/Septic *Lack of enforcement. On 116th, property was sold to build a horse arena?? They put a septic-tank in on a Saturday (no pennit) and the house (not suitable for living) is now being occupied by multiple families. We (the neighbors) have fonnally complained to Health Department, Land Use, Water people. It is not anyone's job to stop this. 1500's area of S.E. 116th) *No sewer-land use residential. (14000's of 171st Ave. S.E.) *Need sensible advance of the sewer system. (13200 block of180th Ave. S.E.) *Discrimination. Different septics for different people (Money) (14600 block, 161st. Ave. S.E.) Churches/Schools in Rural Area *Preventing churches is a disservice. (Maple Hills) *Schools are always in need of$ and not enough churches in our area. (20500 block ofS.E. 136th St.) *Since there has been an increase in housing, it would be great if churches could purchase land, as well. (Maple Hills) Drugs/ Alcoholism *This is everywhere. (20500 block of S.E. 136th) Government Sen,ices *Lack of enforcement. *My biggest concern is the lack of enforcement of safety codes. [ A J neighbor has a trailer that they hauled onto the property and set up without pennits from the County. They are running a power line from the back of the house to .. the trailer. I am concerned about the fire hazard ... My neighborhood is also zoned single family residential and the property in question already has a house on it and they are using the trailer as a rental ... rm also concerned about outdoor burning that takes place 9 months of the year. Why is the County allowing outdoor burning in a residential neighborhood? Why are my neighbors being permitted to smoke me out of my own yard? I can~ even have the windows ofmy house open for 9 months of the year because of the burning ... [T]hey burn their household garbage everyday .. .!! hardly seems fair that something this serious isn't brought up for a vote. I warn my voice to be heard and I want to vote on the issue of outdoor burning in residential neighborhoods. The County needs to come up with alternatives to burning. The County should offer curb side pick-up of yard waste. If the City of Renton can offer this service to its citizens, then the County should do the same for us. (12000's area of 176th Ave. S.E.) *I am very concerned about zoning law enforcement in the unincorporated areas. (26300 block of S.E. 158th St.) Composting Company *Keep smell down. *Great. (14600 block, 161st. Ave. S.E.) Services for Elderly *I don't see any of these either, except in Issaquah. (Tiger Mountain) Other & Miscellaneous *There must be some way the gun club could build sound absorbing walls around the shooting range to reduce the volume. (18300 block of 145th) *Improve animal welfare. Too many people simply tie up their dog for long times, sometimes their whole lives. People should be educated about the cruelty of it. (Licorice Fern) *Trash along the roads is another concern. We pick it up all the times. (13100 block, 158th Ave. S.E.) *You all do a great job. (Above Hi-Valley) *Need to address the litter problem along 128th--organize neighborhood clean up days--pick up the litter, etc. (Lake Kathleen area) *Thanks for your community involvement to help our neighborhood. (Briarwood) *Over 50 years ago we had the technology to get rid of the internal combustion engine, but greed for money is always first. Everybody has hurry to the next red light. Get rid of the King County Council. (14600 block, 161st. Ave. S.E.) *This is a beautiful and, generally speaking, peaceful place to live. "Beautiful" goes without saying, but peaceful, yes, most of the time. What I mean is we don't have busy freeway overpasses crisscrossing over our homes and we don't live under a flight pattern. The kind of peace rm talking about is neighbor-to-neighbor. We've lived here almost 9 years in the Mirrormont area and have noticed that people don~ mingle much with their neighbors. Maybe because of the way properties are: large lots made private by thick, tall tree growth, no sidewalks to invite people out for a stroll, numerous dark, dreary days that keep people inside their homes. Not enough common areas--neighborhood parks or fishing/swimming holes ... We would love to see the Mirrormont Park Project happen. Some residents expressed concern that "outsiders" would come swarming into our neighborhood park, invading our community with hoards of people and traffic jams full of cars, aimed at the park's parking lot. This just simply wouldn't happen--not here any more than it has happened to the Four Lakes community, with their lake, park, and gazebo. (We are for creating a park here.) Getting back to the peace-with-your-neighbor subject, I don't think people talk to each other enough (or ever). I Mve obderved that, if someone drives past another's property and sees a tree or two being cut down or a piece of heavy equipment changing the landscape, suddenly an anonymous letter shows up in their inailbox or a sign outside their land is spray-painted with an accusing graffitti. The person who wrote the nasty message never bothered to go to them and talk. Perhaps, if they made a neighborly visit over to the people, they would have found out that the two trees being removed were deceased or growing in a dangerous way that was threatening the structure of the home or such. Maybe the piece of heavy equipment was smoothing out an uneven, pitted area to make a level lawn or playing area that could be safe and more usable for a family with children. Or how about a handicapped relative? We'd like to suggest that your board put together some kind of "outline of suggested ways to talk to your neighbor" form Send one to everyone. Perhaps it could have a few suggestions of how to talk to a neighbor regarding their dog that keeps you awake at night or whatever collection of disputes may exist between neighbors. Let's get neighbors talking not murmuring against each other. Maybe you could include the form in your next mailing or, at least, write up a few paragraphs encouraging neighbors to talk. (Mirrormont) Re-sTclenfSurvey . . --. - Response to Proposed Rezone and Preliminary Plat of Evendell - 1-.Q1PQQ1G11nd L01TY401 rh I c; Viola Sc,,bu Name L-aJt.,, P...6 • Address l?/1_2 158 live. 5 .[. 'ilen:fvn, UM 98059 Phone Number Email Address A I Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. e'l\lJ.AOnineiu. 2. The (!J'tt,ffl'Tffl<!ftt a/ May we include this data in communications with King County? No No No Yes No /ol(eVe/1..· 3. 9nC'T.ea.6liUj the nwnbe/C. of. h.omM would pui. a .o:fJtaUt on cul rdJ..u;lip..o, MAV i.cM, <'..O,OW.tLlhj: pol.ice, and .odwob. • [B I Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neiahborhood will be damaaed bv this develooment. If vou own Livestock animals. olease list tvnAs and numbers Tvoe Number Tvoe Number Tvoe Number floMf'.L> l!amao 2 A,-.-,,. n ,;- ( <>UM C,ee.oe -duclu, -:twiheu mnnu C Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestin or other Ion -term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. 7 11)() /[ed :failed hawlu, f .!.!fUUJ o~ p1W;"e/l71f. NumP.Jif/M. l><lclU.Jt('.,/,t, , • One bald "en.a.!.e. /J.,/..UU/ ove/C. oWl ()l[O,".Jf'AfU () . r' ,', ' ' C: 7/accoon i.n OWl bad. umui. C D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. !We have a /.nh.e of {1)(lf<'A on :t.h.e erud .o.ide of. ow, home e.vem; t.une il NUJUs Bdol[e put.:f..i.n.7 i.n a ,t,peci..i.J dMin, oWl pp.:fi.Jr.e. bad, fcvrd !.,p..=me a !ak" wl,en il l[(,ined corrwu; JLi-9/,:t up to oWl dool[, dopped on/11 b/1 pui.tliUj i.n a .ofh"hon h,u.e. If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! /c1 Z ·.·-' .: : : Scoby ·z;:rz_ Address /3//(,, /Sft>-, /TV? 5& P. cn-fon, lJfJ-q fD:51 Phone Number Email Address 2-3 5 :'.=:•---::::,.~a:~~---·= .. -.~---s--..... -~ !el•--·-.~_ -':.. _"":---.~ ... --__:_. _;:;;. A I Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. 1. 2. 3. May we include this data in communications with King County? No No B I Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neiahborhood will be damaaed bv this develooment. If vou own Livestock animals olease list tvoos and numbers Tvne C Number Tvoe Number Type Number . Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestin or other Ion --term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. I ~./\...:.. o.-~ _ _, .:s I () ec.JI... I j/1' o-;-re,.) o V L. / l>A lO t: AJ""- II) Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! Lt\( z,,fc ~ame \ddress !30i7!S !SR ~ {)--e~, __,,j,C,. p-,x:_,, / Wll. t?Josr; :mail Address ~ I Please desclibe your lop 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. I. May we include this data In communications with King County? No No No Yes No B I Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neinhborhood will be damaoed bv this develnnment. If vou own Livestock animals nlease list tv""s and numbers rv= Number Tvoe Number T"""' Number -- C Descnbe the kinds of wildlife you have seen In this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestin or other lo -term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. D) Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. r you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! f>c,u,s Zof2- Name Address Phone Number Email Address !JiitlM of'. .. : ,f I r . / ·./ d /f;f. _? A--S/·t'<~ ,/ 1'/1 //t 'j::,Y. ':; ,:.,:14 &,"'( f@t1 ,K May we include this data in communications with King County? /·-. '· YeS·,: '--., ... ,/ ,..--, ' (" ' \ Yes\ No No No No A Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. 1. n')Oll.{CY ~u /rv'--v 1Lw1cJJ.. ,cJ'Y01t£du.. t;J/ _ ~Llu.A.,r I L~ Glue};'.)··. ) '"o~J-/J?7{Llltt?tL:>-_ a.i-;_u101L,l"t',?i-?!:J .. /:n:v2L.2~3 -. · .. • · c. .; · ;)'' ' '<-, -~· 0 1 ; : /21.,u.J,,rtlJ/i·.1 2. b1 tf--{1v~4' f, .tt"'J.:J r,f ,0.t!ft.~ /t,rJ felttt.ifk! d-21'/L/ . # ~ . SnJ aLtu'otL · -( Yrl( .l.11 (?) {j 2t) Y~a .. £/;u_'.--n / 2 S--(;_~t_,,15,y . ,,.,. _ .'I.LL '/ ;J-, ,·,, . ,,-}"'[ / di . / 5-,,' ,1./2 f;-;:2.,· ~ "a 3· ,.L?)LfY.tcl-/11 · tcz.!t/ .llfa· J__· _f.L,1)./,;j-/?Jcft >r L,., {!_,r>w);iud[Jiy1u-:s·c72.t.1'0. 1 !{. {l ,J/t7ri &i>LQ) utJJJspid) tJ0 'd-,Lt1,, 1-.-:; 'J B \ Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neiAhborhood will be dama1ied bv this development. If vou own Livestock animals nlease list tvnes and numbers Tvoe Number Tvoe Number T= Number (' n !'I" .k "'.A/\ "' . C Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestin or other Ion -term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. 6-dd -ec~.'1 i-e, ouJ J-s <!..OLJcJ t c., ,oCLOO ,1, possu,m I r-Ct,b b1 rs I t.Joad P~ -t',:i cn1ctac.r~6:sna.lcl1/ (OVIJ/15, i.ilu.eJ~j5, c:._,-01,..uS, 3f)LlrroW5 I (Jawl:5, SPq a/g jf)r/2.()~1 ma./kJ~,i 0/)c/:S, /)1,0)/'})1,')!_;l.VYi'.-/5 J (7<:'e,-1 :::Sf_c,;FrR/5,, Oii!)Cl1-i11/K ) \.--- D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. h,5n~,)c.0\--er ta...b/e ha5 CcU{,sed. 8ept1L Dt1u:_ a,o, /Ve 19htJr ru1,ofF(iaU!J.fe ::stv--Pt1W1 />,.b{;)c.J(!J~lvcl wf/€ 11 1'J-Yc1/'l')'.5, Jl)cJut.u ,':i r1 nr 5 Ct v-.e Ct bo t' n /;,o.c.J, aw..!- If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! I of'Z c. I - Address / 5 / / 'f P. r r /-,-;)[1 f /_I:, r 1v{' f//A · r.r.:p O~C::-7 Phone Number ' Email Address • / 0 ( 0/ I A Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project May we include this data in communications with King County? No No No Yes ' No c>''- /[;6 Ii! ___ _. ------ B j Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neighborhood will be damaged by this development. If you own Livestock animals. please list tvnAs and numbers Tvoe Number Tvoe Number Tvoe Number - C Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestin or other Ion -term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. S~1!&111t,:.t11t:l~1:1 lf~rtJn,;:'. .'J',:t()! l?~J . Ot1// .n.t,!rrl!J,. Eafs-1. ;-:J i!A c ,.>1JjrJ s 1 -" ,i; v 1 ~ I~ i V £.!./,,\ {///J1~ 1 Cu y ui,.f!. / l'! 1/ q <-l (' . F ;Y.)(. s: . Toc;,.:/s . · r.inkr: {!Ja /c.fs. 1-<e-1~~-1 ,; /-Iv r1v1t21/1-1< (JI 0 .. · /ia kc U/u ,t{)(- D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experience . · , C/:f I ; //// /),/, ', __ ·· .. ./..' t'/11./ \·./ (JU/' ··J· I li, ;£) If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet Even more paper is available. Just ask! .M-d' Cn-r/_.eu!' u{A)od~f'rk-er,, 62ct/l.s I ~.\/(/&;//~ Jt·~y r C!'OWS"; u/lo/ duc/r...s· J I l~ v J ins I J'J!t/ e ewe hav.f 3t rrOt"Jv() 6u/i/NJj!: /-l{Jt V./ ,le s I Z a It! (;b5, /j_r, ~ // jJ/.e sp c;/// 1 ;1:1 ci'.l..s t-1/~ $ P.P/1' &; {/J ~ /'YrPtl /hJ {ovyc::tr_ 7Jul 5 djf«1t/ //t:f~2ot/rs " / ,i 1,;· 1 ./ It 17 o;--/e a' s; u 1141 #! fiH I all {/ .uy ·'] , 1· ' 1 I ( [).(?I/ {:(/Cl Cl-/1 /((} J2r/_f), / "? 'f . . / ., j;:) /t~ . ) C _). -, .'> . .1 ResicleiiiSt1rvey ,,,--· -\ · ----· •· Response to P1opose~ Rezone and Prel1111inary Plat of Evenc!ell - kQ1P;QOt~ ?.l)C! k,0.1TY:401 . . . , , . ,. May we include this data in communicalions with King County? No Address /3 //:? 15!? //UC S6 f)v-,-fon; Lu/I <7g'Q5C/ No Phone Number L/c) 5 -c} 7 I -7517 -Ye Email Address Yes . . . A I Please desaibe your top 3 ooncems of the effects~ the ~ Evendell project 1. JJJ7f)(lc.'-f on ·-Hie. rc1ral aimo.spl?er& of Oll r ne 1 'glt_hor hooc/ we.. /Jave. . /a,y1e /o-fs' _o/'/d C)..., Court-fr rt se:/11/79 & wi.J-11 -~ J°l??Ser//e., 1/-. 2. T1a-.f-f1c -{)Cir sfree/-()si11} /Joe{ /70 s1de_wa/.c5 O()d C--oa/cf /1of ha11c//e 0/l //JCre't15-C //7 77ctmc · _. :I-i woutd bz 1,112sa-fc. -fe/ cvr · /Je1}li.oo//zood C,,1/d/,t:0- . 3. Ci7t///O/)/JJ€'/J,7?ll u11de ve.l o j)e cl 10-/5 h orne for Lui Id lr/2. V UJ/l_~r/75 --we_ /Jat/_(/__ --/CZJ9e , Lu i-111._ ---fr.e es. ·----;-/! a i-/>.rot/ 1 de CG ,suc/z. as t:7aJles1 dee~ e·-fc _ C Describe the kinds of wildlife you have &ee11 in lhis area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are · or other erm habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. . -deer a--!---hie 2..11d ()-/-15:? 111 -/i'ie. o,-Oel? -;:ieild- . {:.oujcu-on --tfte. c or //e;· c, f I 3 z "' IS J7 (CL C'Oons Or) IS[?/ [) j Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Desaibe any drainage related problems you have experienced. (J)e.. ore at! 01'1 S<?phc. .s·c;s-/c.ms 1 !Jere. we.. C1rJL. wc,rned -;-1,Q-t--rlie. bu;!c/1177 of ()omes · mc,y f//Cre'ase:. (!)_l)O·{-f 0/lc:/ /U/IJ Q{.//' c:/)/dl/l --fields: If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet Even more paper is available. Just ask! PrT>:~c~ Ze,t'Z.c Address / 7> l ,J ) J 511 Cl/\ ft>e_ , 1 _ { t? evt+uv, I Ll__(//-q g Q s-c( Phone Number '771-,r'L 1g7 Email Address A I Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. 1. l 2. 3. May we include this data in communications with King County? Yes No No Yes No Yes No If"<' Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen In this area, and where you have seen them. Especially Important are ~ nesti or other Ion term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches coun too. D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! To: Distribution List Attached April 3, 2002 To: King County Surface Water and Land Management From: Michael Rae Cooke 13125 158th Ave. SE. Renton, WA 98059 Subj: Proposed Rezone and Preliminary Plat of Evendall-L01P0016 and L01TY401 As a homeowner, we recognize that growth is inevitable. But we also know that there are current regulations, laws and statutes in place that impose requirements on applications of this type. The current application does NOT meet these requirements for the following reasons. Additionally, we wish to prevent loss of the character ofan existing community, loss of habitat for wildlife, loss of habitat for livestock, loss of safety regarding exit routes during disasters, and protection from disease and crime that occurs when packing a dense number of people into a small area .. a. Urban Grid Pattern: It does not meet the urban grid pattern zoning requirements. b. Public Vote: Without a vote of the existing residents, the area was arbitrarily rezoned from RI to R4. When you look at a layout map this is very obvious. One developer has secured a rezone substantially inside the western border ofR4 to R8. Now comes this other developer trying to add another R8, well into the center of the R4 area. If the later succeeds, the plan is to rezone again in the 5 acres adjacent to the Evendall plat. c. Character of the Neighborhood: It is not in the character of the existing neighborhood. The existing neighborhood is semi rural, not urban, inspite of what the county has rezoned it to. Seven houses to the acre in an area that is composed of I, 2, 5, I 0, and 20 acre plots with one house apiece is totally out of character with the existing neighborhood. In addition, regarding the quality oflife, we thrive on the sounds of horses neighing, goats baying, cattle lowing, numerous bird and small animal sounds, space to breathe, safe areas to walk, rural beauty. We have precedent right to maintain our quality of life here, the animals we keep, and the forests and wildlife we protect. d. Traffic: Traffic Safety, tax increases, and maintenance has not been sufficiently managed or studied, at peak traffic periods as well as evening hours. By published statistics traffic averages 15,000 to 16,000 cars a day already on 156th Ave. SE, a two-lane road. This will add over 400 or so additional trips up a dead end street (158th Ave. SE.) per day. The impact on taxes, the county road maintenance, etc., will be substantial. Trying to get out onto SE 1281h is almost impossible already. There has been one fatality, and many accidents, but the county has not addressed local residents' concerns and complaints to act on behalf of our safety. e. Fire and Earthquake: The present road structure is barely able to sustain OSHA requirements for escape routes. I) Houses as close together as Windsong on SE I 28th present an incredible fire danger. If one goes, a whole row will go. At the very least heavy damage will be done to the houses on either side, fire trucks and aid cars will not be able to get to them with the residents trying to get out.· 2) We have many natural gas lines in the area. In the event ofan earthquake, peple trying to escape will not be able to do so with the density of 75 new houses on 158th and possibly 20 more adjacent to it in the space of 5 acres. That's 85 houses crammed onto 17.5 acres. This is criminal when it comes to safety issues. e. Wildlife/Environmental Isssues: There are serious wils life and environmental issues that have not been addressed by King County Water and Land Managment offices, nor certified wildlife biologists. The current environmental checklists submitted byt the developers lists "unknown" no less that four times for threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Let me fill you in on what exists there, and in the area., in many cases nesting: I) This is a list of the wildlife on my property: Weasels, Pileated Wood~ecker (nesting), Squirrels (nesting), Raccoons, Opossum, Field Mice (nesting), Great Horned Owls, Red Tail Hawk. Snowy Owl, Doves, Cedar Waxwings, Blue Jays, Crows, Titmouse's, Kill Deer, Wren, Mallards, Sparrows. Ruby Finch, Roufess Twoee, Robin, Black Capped Chickadee, Hummingbirds (Ruby and one other (nesting). (2) Ninety percent of these are permanent residents. All of these reside and nest arow1d me on neighbors property adjacent to mine. In addition this seems to be a part of the flyway for Gulls and Canadian Geese as they do land on our wetlands and fields. Ruffled Grouse have been seen nesting by neighbors. (3) Carnivors: In addition cougar (multiple) have been sighted by neighbors one house down from me, around the next block, and up 160"' for two years running, as their habitat is being diminished by R4 and R8 building. ( 4) Black Tailed Deer are resident on the Evendall plot. I have seen them (four or five of them) often feeding in the fields across the street on 160"' Ave. SE. Behind me on 156'", I have seen them running across the road to eat in the fields around 14 2"" and 144"'. (5) Bugs and Insects: Most of us have large gardens, fruit trees, open spaces, and evergreen and maple treed lots which provide shelter to a variety of bugs, insects, and wildlife. Beetles of all kinds, hornets, mud wasps, bees of four or live varieties including the endangered native bees, and the rare Bumble Bee nest here and are common here. Several varieties of Dragonflies, Butterflies, and Moths nest here. All of these are present on my and my neighbor's properties. · (6) Across the May valley a mile away, are bear on the property of my friends who live there. The character of the open fields and the surrounding trees and wetlands which provide homes for the wide variety of wildlife is currently protected by the character of the neighborhood as it is. It was especially protected as RI. It has been mitigated to R4. Grading permits have not been applied for by the developer as required. This may be because they arc likely to result in an impact upon the existing condition of a sensitive area. · e. livestock Issues: On my plot I maintain two Toggenburg Goats (the size of small ponies), two Indian runner ducks (nesting), 2 large dogs, and 1 cat. Ne:rt door to me are 38 chickens. South of me are a minimum of 12 horses. Within the space of 3 acres south are 5 cattle. North of me, next to the 38 chickens are numerous geese and ducks, and an occasional turkey. Behind me are large houses on several acres apiece with dogs and children. On 160'" running from 132•• Street south are multiple horses and cattle. Right across from the Evendall plat are Carrier pigeons. Adjacent the Evandall plat are multiple horses (south side) and llamas (east side). f. Drainage: In the last three years, the area has experienced escalating drainage impacts, which have caused flooding and severely impacted the existing residents. (!). New Flood Issues: Since the building on SE 128'" and surrounding area began in earnest three years ago, we have been subjected to severe flooding every year, whereas in the 29 years I have owned this piece of property we never h~d a flooding problem before. (a) My barn bas been inundated for the last 3 years with several inches of water during heavy rains. Fortunately part of it is higher than the other, but even that got doused 2 years ago. (b) Under my house bas been flooded for the last 3 years with large amounts of water during continued heavy rains and this is a health bawd requiring sump pumps. (2) Creeks. A creek runs 7 months out of the year across the back pastures behind mine and the neighbors. We never had flood issues prior to the changes caused in the water table by the developers putting too many houses on land that previously would not perk. The old laws required perks 3 times a year. (3) Springs: There are multiple springs in the area. These have become creeks as the water table level has risen due to destruction of wide tracks of trees, which remove and utilize approximately 1,000 gallons of water a day. (4) Underground River: It is suspected Uiat there is an underground river here. I have dug down to air in the back of my property and there are parts of it Uiat are forever green even in the hottest summer. (5) Ditches: The county has refused to clean out our ditches, which provide drainage, for they say "lack of funds". (6) Two Swamp and Pond areas less than 1/8 1 • mile from the house (Coal Creek). (7) Perk requirements and drainage ponds: Perks of property entertained for building, originally had to be perfonned twice in the rainy season, and once in the dry in order to get a pennit. Because this area contains several Class II wetlands, these were usually denied. Apparently because of the new engineering for drainage ponds, this restriction has been lifted. HOWEVER THE NEW DRAINAGE PONDS HA VE NOT PREVENTED FLOODING, but rather have increased it!! Additionally with the drainage ponds have come noxious weeds and hordes of mosquitoes. No one maintains the drainage ponds and they are eyesores and blights on the neighborhoods in which they exist. Once SE 128'" was lovely to look at. Now we face rows of ugly drainage ponds. You have only to look at developments of three or seven years to see what a blight they become. We respectfully submit this letter and the attached smnmary response to the Proposed Evendell Rezone and Plat Permit Applications LO IPOO 16 and LO ITY 40 I which point out existing conditions, laws and regulations, that support denial of these applications and applications like it Sincerely, Michael Rae Cooke Program Analyst and Resident 13125 158"' Ave. SE. Renton, WA 98059 -- Address Phone Number Email Address A I Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. May we include this data in communications with King County? es) No No No No ii"" Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are ~ nestin or other Ion -term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count t . II) Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! 0~ Tor~ \1.u.~ -(1(ex:&J c,_ IJJ-(/4Q_J ,~i,-~S c<AY i);\.C/ 1~1'I~e.. ?icc.5; 0 ('.)w_ ·1 l \ , Name Address t50So s& 138-t~ P\ ~~\ol"\, WA q~05°1 Phone Number Email Address A I Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. 1. t,f'lL) irO(\rl")~f"\--ro\ ~°t,u_ct\O't, ~ f'Qbitc, I~ {)Qrro.g~ . May we include this data in communications with King Count ? No No No No / ren:.c, seu 2 · QJerc.roli.XJi nzt ot S:,\,co\s ;''-\-rQ ~';i" ~ (\i~\-}rnore.S) \ N::_.lc:05e.d CX'(ff\t_ 3. Loss o~ 11aturql beau13 B I Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neiqhborhood is distinctl rural. If vou own Livestock animals, olease list tvnes and numbers Type Number Tvoe Number Tvpe Number 'r\(l"n\~ ,:J C Describe the kinds of animals you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestin or other Ion -term habitations an uses. Creatures in d'=itc:ihi-le"'s'-:'c":oc=-u:.:,nt"-:, :':to":o:'-. J-,,-..,....,-.,,_--±----=c-=-bc-.,....----j Oee~ 1.0oodp~'.kr(J-fe~ ,nf,do I tqc.co:> , 59,'-i;r-re , ?Yl e) Y'l"\Oe.-); W:Q~\ rob~ns, ~111c.he5, 'olueJo'-15, :,no, es. l,e.e.. ~"oc:rs 13c,cK ybrd <I-,,.,Jct !?el-,,nd 4S) .J ~ E.. '. b C D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! May we include this data in communications with King County? Name Ml\/l-Sf-\A (le u.., :.JG et?.. ~ No Address 151,,4 u SE 13 B Til P LAC.f Ret-srot-J, WA_ 'l!:,05'1 @) No Phone Number '12'5.-Z.Tl. 024'5 ,~ No Email Address Vv\!1..c,11\ASlcc@. a..\:-\c.'o,. l:.C·"'-Q No A I Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. 1. Dt~u.C.,,tiCY\ 9.£ ~ Q,l,\(l{O.Q.W 9J: ~ ru_i~borl-\oool '. w-t. ~C!r~ ~ MlW\{hs to ~d On Qffercl<lblc h~ wltvl Q. \c,r~t :;,urr;ouf\~()( b~. tf-t~ -l"'i~ c.re...o... l ~ c.A-Li< Vl\:~.;:iiu.i-.u., t-Oc.l.j, t<-4·lwo\ 1.. o\ cu, 1cl.1,~. --r\.'\,s pill"' , s l::ot~Lll:I O\..,dc o<f pl (I, QV'O unvu__u.ss<l,":j 1- 2 . EnvlrcnM.tn.t~ !s~v-.L.S ! TNrt. Qf{. \::tio ;'\.U.vN..ru~~ hi 1/\,\.,I_V\bCN\ ! ~rloll(f.t- Y\~~taJc UV\()1.St:1,lf\:JA..o\ for~(~ Wil\ b-<... mt0-.l'::) alt.SVO'f.:'' ·\(-U.S. Id,\&,\: Q,l,~(r~'V\~ s;o~k.·u~ gro c,lwQM.r w111 tlJ... b.!. c».\: do1A.Jn. /wl\maLs ~-.:il\1 ~ d.r~V\ a_w(l,lj o...g{),\ , \'V\o/-t <\01~, I'\(:) l>lW'or--te,\c.~, ..u..ke. ~tt-'d\J.I( ~ 3 _ ov-<.rQU QuUi~.9{ llit, w\\\ ~ olt.c.t.Q..ll5.<.ol ~\KJ'l fu~r '. Tr~e:. ;s ct{ sQ. ll-~~~ ux, bL , e,b-Lc , ~'c.hool ~ or<--(N-{r c:r ow d~ \ B -u.~ o.r ~ 9-rs <l(f ...-t w ~, ~ w1l most \r\~10~ ov..r tr~s cu.u \:Cl V\ J>ltl wt-0.dS wd::v,ol/1.J ~ rro·Q~CV\ * .Q.)((~ tf--U..S I our sipidc S,q~~,'V\ {V\~~, ~-l .~oocL.cl, ...ttc. B J Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neighborhood is distinctl rural. If you own Livestock animals, olease list types and numbers Tvoe Number Type Number Tvne Number C I Describe the kinds of animals you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestino or other lono-term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count, too. D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. If you need more room. please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! n Address \ "3 \"9\) (\_ \'S-i ' t>(\) -$~ Phone Number 4. l, <;'-)S'S -)._ be\ Email Address /. A Please describe your t'JI) 3 roncems nf th'a' ef!'ect:i r the :,re".'':(! Evendel! project. May we include this data in communications with King County? No No No Yes No C I Desaibe the kinds of wildlife you have seen In this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestina or other Iona-term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count. too. \'lAC,\t~" \ p,.,.\.(> i:-J\'j le-:;, \-1, .. -.,.J\'._::~ , C,V\U) ~' \\'f \JS ( ._S)W l'S -\)cS,'2.. -Q.;\e.-eo\JS -f 0.".>Svlv-5 -e4llil~ l-"1..Mlll \ \>Nl'>~\J '> \.l ~e_; . ::; l'L4-m,,,.,bsu -S.<\).,.~U · ;./lfl\\l'\li;T \>i1Ll):i , UJOuP p,c~"-\ · ti-l.ll'.-0~ '> -\\\ll,\,.e_) D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. 1\'I~ ~ .Q,._ e,.~ ~"!.\.I\ t M.tA \':. ~\-ew ~llol\.. ~\ ~ou IYvli.. l-lWjfi:.. i-:>i 1 - 0~'"'~'i-l:S SLow ~ 1\\'L "\>~Tt-(t W\\\ 'l..~~£ ~t. ',~ cl1 s;;Q,\\ll\1.-Q...S ~ ~l)C,\\l~ t,.,1>,1..-\ \.v \\\ ~<-u.,H,t;> o ~ "'°'t.. L--ll,-" b ~ ~E-oC-,'I\.{., y Ro ~o "~ <tu \o~J ~-i\\ '{,S ~ ~)\ \\ t<>-..i- ...:i~ ~<--'-\->-IA LM'\'O~ v'\~ -\ If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheel Even more paper is available. Just ask! Name Address /300 Phone Number Email Address /A. Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. May we include this data in communications with King County? No No No Yes No 1. /(/ 0 ro e,._ 5 h w Cl.t;J -:__ -e_ -lJ (0 a.. (JO+ t,-..:1 ((.n,-f O L(r""' s rr ~ e_,f- +o be.co m..L, /1 lee.., I :::,C::, ~ Dr I UJ --:-. 11 1t¢i 0rl:..er-11 a_-C/11 /dref".- j._ 5ma._/l /]e',<f door) arw. C?r),,net/s, /Ylif.:,,f-o-F o,,,.-!:J'-r s o,,r-e_. bl:J 5L f!!../L.,. , 'llr t{11 i' n1..tcf 5 oa.m o'+ft. ,e.,y e.-i -0 2. ~oo/s -J t,JOr L ,-for ~ 1 · SS"'-c5£t.til..... S~oo < "1;)1 s,f., c_f -w rel"'\ol<k.cl re.c..en+ I j a.0d lv-G. ho~ Ci.dd ~-d. Y Dot<,b/.e __ c)qs.s roofY' rpo~k-s plu.~ l 51 (")J/e-"+lits ear, '--riv2-s,:__/i_oo/s ,e__ re V, U-u-c.ro d · r a. ., B I Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neiohborhood will be damaoed bv this develnnment. If vou own Livestock animals. please list tvnAs and numbers Tvne Number Tvne Number Tvoe Number -. I. A . -~ C Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestin or other Ion -term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! {!)t<A.., .~ ~ .~ ah'?£ _A~ ~ ~~ -t01 !flu St~~ lv~· '--AA_) NJ. L .~ rd'M-1 o s-t-~ ~ ~. [{)JL, --hf!UU?_, JV~ ~ . .__,,t.,_)tc-Dz ~~ - -&~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~?U-<u, Name Address Phone Number 4-z. <; 2"2,~ k1 ( Email Address A . Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. 1. May we include this data in communications with King County? j Yes No t/Yes No No Yes No 2. ~ .. ~ 6\-"'\-k i'\-et.C: v M· (\t)-\_ _ lmv-tl CW!.,\;~ v ifO~e..A-'-\ \~ Jh~ _'3°3i (\cl;('.~~ ~6-~mr~-1\~y ~~ 10-{'1~' CUt1 VY]~ ua.co.J to-ts ~~ ci')e. r~ . 3. B I Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neiahborhood will be damaaed bv this develnnment. If vou own Livestock animals olease list t'""'S and numbers Tvoe Number Tvne Number Tvne Number . : If" Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are ; """ nestino or other lono-term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count. too. D I Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet Even more paper is available. Just ask! 'ResidenfSurvey - Response to Proposed Rezone and Preliminary Plat of Evendell - bQlPQQ:1§ glJQ. b.91TY 491 Name • PE-1 RlE Address So. 2.. 73 .-d. ---- Phone Number 2.. 5 3 -Cf 4 6 -<S. 6 / Y Email Address A I Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. . . e ;(I'S 'CIVl"j R-4 r:;,ON)/.JC,-. May we include this data in communications with King County? Yes No No Yes Yes ::i::-tA.""-d.eve.l opl"'J c;. pt,;.-& ~ -t-f<-4 de"'-s.-1:·'J , ?ov ,t::.~e{· to (t.p £:c,:st!:: ,::;,+-1= ue:,,uDELL, ad jc;c:_e,.,i·· fo l.q:n,,,P.T .. f ,-/tC~I-• Sc r.,,01.-. A,"' e.xi.-st,114 f>la.--t /8cR'E.0A PP,1'1:.~), .)'-'st: ~o tt,e._ .s.,...,CI.. is 157000 I \. < S(i} -Ft. I ,,.,-t . :r be ... ,. LJ "1<1 'J 0.... -£· t<> do 4-£> r B I Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neighborhood will be damaged bv this develanment. If vou own Livestock animals nJease list tvnes and numbers Type '· ,., Number Tvoe Number T""" Number ·--'•, ' ' C I Describe the kinds of wi~~ave seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestina or other Iona-term hali ·ons and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. '~ -~ "· IQ I Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any ~e related problems you have experienced. ~~- ' -~- If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet Even more paper is available. Just ask!'· May we include this data in communications with King County? Address 1352-1-lSI., ReV\+o n I W Pt Phone Number Email Address -/.,:,70:Z A . Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. Yes· No No Yes No Yes No --~) .Cou1>\e:;, exp<:'f=,ti'/'1 ct ~st,,:..\\,\cl -fr w',-tJ....CMe. ,o•· woyoa111~ e:A'li v-en eil"C( :pr1ee 1. e.il\shwi stnlt\ ,:,,\-a'...-te.-homes .,i ,,H; !:fctvas 11,,c·it,e !<.,els, b)O !Je;r res,de n-ts .be'.,..,1 +a~eJ oFP pwf,61-t'ifh~ r.c..ve oui~ .f!? r ~+'f&tr~. C) l·ives+oc.k <!>tOvle.rs be1"'1 s,~ueezed ollT of fClS+u.re -For-sa..,d 1ves+oc..k · i'o.-i tM,cJet11a..ble.. t ;.,,fct.e,t B j Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neiohborhood will be damaoed bv this development. If vou own Livestock animals please list !voes and numbers Type Number Tvoe Number Tvne Number t,1,... ,.-c;"' I . . D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. ~+ f i'e,<:,e,0. , c\ u.e. O Ou.ir O e~r,e:,,ce .seveve dva.int<.qe D V\ I\ e.11.. i-o o.. e.,LU,, ~ Woo ov eV'os',0 " :prable,ns. \-loweve.r, · If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! :tli'fom;ct QlAaJ :~\deev- ~ea..s0-,Y\ t'::> d-J1 v-ea.s-ted ~ .::> u.c.1ee-s mer·, c0vv1 GD ld ~1 V\e,h l"e9on )Ll<\C.os :u.{us-s!Jecl "towhees {)..v-ied thn,ish Oil Se ti nches rOIAJ '::> hesi-nd-htc.ked di,co.cl ees la.d-Ctlfped Ji:Cadees :.1,~-tt\vca.W httrnm1~bi'rds \\e, s -\ ; (\ 'i':t..id ll.A,J a.d jdee1A.-l----uJ t>od s U;follS ~ h"'vn"",.-,1bids :.d broi.'<>\-ed nu.. t hoJe,~es__, _ . ( :/i,..:;,f. · '-\" <1,r 1.-0 .v .s · V cur t (Hl ~ . t 1 ..-i hu.$ h q,\.o ""! 3 b ' i:J I, f\tev-w \ren -<Y\ 5ec I ttdeJ pa..v-1 of ~av-d fleo.v-vJo s "' ii ,\ \, , lb,, \I , 1 I , ' ore-n~~kl5 / ·wa..t\OW$-i,e.s'hl/\1 111\ OCL-1" I.U d1ncp,, ,hCLi,lTi"9 ,vi ) v.:, \ s . ~e.s ii l'IC\ '(\ w ooc\$ N w c,t O (LI'" t' ro:r-rty a,.,,a s t o4 0 LL tr "fro pevf ~' ~c1.wk5 . \J.Lu/\··ti°wJ ~~e,r 1,\fooc\s =_A <!>fe11.J!i'e\Js CLnd o c.ca.s,'ol\ct.l\'i 1•, ~vees 1,\Jo...Ui',1'"( 5m£t\le.r birds -feed\<\~ ll'\ our ~Q,---d, (eJ ·· shCi:ffed fl,~L~,v-J aJ b,;-c\ ~eede,-;,, ~<1.vd \i uh'\"\ wo odf ec-ke.----J , )i'I ~ o...kJ "ti o od f""c.-le.-v . 'n ClJJa:.c.evc.-\-wocded bf <.ob;,"\$. nes--f ;.,., ~a.v-d =·d :.'zl)..1'ro"""d"1t woods S-hv/iriqs -~eel i'"' q(ct.ss o,, b\)..qs,,. ... J 9'rccb"' ResTde-nfS~urvey ·----. --·· . -----. - Response to Proposed Rezone and Preliminary Plat of Evendell - kQ1PQQ1f:i ~p~l i,,Q1TY401 Name C. ,c. Phone Number ,'4;;:r) ? ~-' Email Address 'J A I Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. May we include this data in communications with King County? Yes No No No -Yes B I Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our nei!lhborhood will be damaQed bv this develooment. If vou own Livestock animals. olease list tv""s and numbers Tvne -d., Number Tvoe Number TvnA Number -:1-/,a.,,,, A• A I -,:,o .. -, u_ ... .. • • • - ' . If'" Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are v nestin or other Ion -term habitations and uses, Creatures in ditches count too. Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet Even more paper is available. Just ask! J~,01.:~ ke4p.1101C/: a1,2<t., Afl'Z«i-~ ~ ,1!-4-' ev_~L6d/:: ,a,12-<v. May we include this· data in communications with King County? /'?1' di,.-1 /) d' . s:-~~ ./.d ~e rv;~· ·- Name ) No I /ff/ti" (lc/C.~ _;;··r -- Address /'?f'd'y (S;J, No ,,.---. .. Phone Number '/2-<;-~ ).. 7 I " ..,7t,) (rv;;)' No ··' (Yes ~,,, Email Address No '------A I Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. :s /' /? .7;{;.J fr?c,.c.,/~ -µ~ft/< //<rt" /r?"C -/ /'/( <:: /,,,v/,:P e 1. / J"".:/~ ~··v,-J - 2. -1--;:i)( c:3' -/,,, ~ !" -7- 3. L/A:::c:. ,/ ,P (/ ,'V 777 /tv·/,,J:,f- B I Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neiahborhood is distinct!, rural. If, ou own Livestock animals. olease list tvnes and numbers Tvoe Number Tvne Number Type Number C I Describe the kinds of animals you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestina or other Iona-term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. , D \ Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! Name Address j 30(2 /srg71h ,4-Vt <;E-. R,;e.!f-t-t/n r Wit q'BOS'} Phone Number Email Address May we include this data in communications with King County? No No No No A Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. Number C I Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestina or other Iona-term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count, too. D I Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. t::_" /Y,. 'I .:::>='·" (," /7Vi'. .. , (.( (~ .:· t!C \ r·-\~. I\~('_,'\·(''( , .. 1J ('_. (1,~ !. \ \,.., ,-:,;·\ (;._ .. • ·"'' .. , ,•· .. ' . , \; e-c>-r~,.C\ t-U ' '·· ·.~· -·'-· : .. .. .•• __! :-: ' ,· ·', \.., If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! -Resident Survey -------. -· Response to Proposed Rezone and Preliminary Plat of Evendell - !-.Q1 PQQ1§ 11J1c! 1,,01 TY 401 Name ,/~--~. Phone Number Email Address A. Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. May we include this data in communications with King County? Yes No No No No i if"" Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are I 11.o nestin or other Ion -term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. IQ I Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! I Address \1-S. \(.\ \ ')'zS tr A'le. S ~ Q.__-e0. \ ,, 'I' , vv A °I. '6 o ::, q_ Phone Number Email Address A Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project/ May we include this data in communications with King County? No No Yes Yes / / .t] B J Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neiahborhood will be damaaed bv this develooment. If you own Livestock animals, please list tvoos and numbers Type Number Tvoe Number Tvoe Number . C Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestin or other Jon -term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. n.v-\""~ ,l'o,.c.'f:.oo"'s"$.."\'1'>,_.::.s':>i.\.="'\?"'\,; 1 \.\.J..'<. >"'")~, ""o"~ 1?<!.-\c-e,sso\>1"'s G..'(\I> <,e:'le\c,\(I S~-e.ce5 CY \JVl\6 '¢,<,~<;1 (;,-,,1"""'\c, ,(c~e~~ ~"'!,, &,'f\\'\\i'\?I"'")· II) Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! l From: Bretb2600@aol.com To: Highlands_Neighbors@hotmail.com Subject: Evendell Development Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:57:25 EST My name is Bret Bowden, and I am writing this letter because I oppose the Evendell Development. This development will be directly across from my property. Property which I enjoy watching the wildlife that resides there, such as deer, and hawks, woodpeckers, and I've heard owls over there too. Not to mention the little ones too, like the raccoons and such. It sickens me that they can build a "mini mass" neighborhood on our street. Our neighborhood does not need anymore traffic that this "mini mass" neighborhood will inevitably create. It would stick out like a sore thumb here. Where does king county expect all these animals to live? We need to stop running all these animals away from their homes. It's no wonder neighborhoods close by have cougars and bears wondering on their properties .. And whats King County's answer to that? Shoot them. Enough is enough. This is their way to try and push other neighbors away and sell their property so this nonsense can continue. • A couple months ago the drainage ditch across the street (in front of the proposed development) started flooding (again) and all the water was going across the road and into my property, flooding it. So I called King County Roads. When they arrived I told them it need to be drenched some so it could flow properly. They told me that they couldn't because of the salmon. (the service call is on record) People on our street don't even have a sidewalk to safely walk on, and the extra traffic will do nothing but endanger pedestrians and the wildlife that most of us came hear to enjoy. This development is totally out of place here. Homes hear are on acreage and this doesn't belong here and we don't want it. King County needs to step_up and do the right thing. The trees, the deer, the hawks, the many different kinds of birds, and all the other wildlife that live there need to keep their homes too Bret Bowden 13814 160th ave. s.e. Renton, wa. 98059. l What is wrong with this picture? High density zoning is lilOT consistent with the character of our neighborhood. We are the buffer between high density of the City of Renton and the rural zone of Unicorporated King County in accordance with the King County Comprehensive Plan. we demand the protection of our neighborhood as guaranteed by law. ~6ll6xaD1ls &OD6mD111ta l!ca,17 m ~aS{ll>@DllsDD»Da rn~aDll~aDD Highlands_Neighbors@hotmail.com What is wrong with this picture? Nigh density zoning is NOT consistent with the character of our neighborhood. We are the buffer between high density of the City of Renton and the rural zone of Unlcorporated King County in accordance with the King County Comprehensive Plan. We demand the protection of our neighborhood as guaranteed by law. Citizens Alllance for a Responsible Evendell Hlghlands_Neighbors @hotmail.com This is what our quiet, tree-filled neighborhood currently looks like ... SE 138th Pl.· Trees In back on proposed Evendell site... 13012 158th Ave. SE 13405 158th Ave . SE 15646 SE 138th Pl. 13110 158th Ave . SE 13112 158th Ave . SE 13152 158th Av e. SE Some neighborhood livestock 13414 158th Ave . SE 13527 156th Ave . SE 13512 132nd Pl. 13616 156th Ave . SE 13644 160th Ave . SE 158th Ave . SE Adjoi n ing Proposed Evendell Site on 160th Ave . SE 13004 158th Ave . SE This is what it would change to ... WlndWood Cherry lane at the Orchard• WlndWood WlndSong The proposed Evendell plan DOES NOT FIT with the character of our neighborhood!! This is our HOME. We live here because it is safe and quiet with a old fashioned comfortable character. We wake up to roosters crowing and birds singing. We end our evenings in our large backyards, gazing at the stars while the breeze whispers through the trees. We cherish our neighbors • families, children, elders, owls, foxes, woodpeckers, Douglas Firs, hummingbirds, horses, cows, ducks and all the rest. We are fighting to protect them all. Citizens A111ance for a Responsible Evendell Highlands_Neighbors@hotmail.com ' J Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Eveno'lell Highlands_Neighbors@hotmail.com Maya, 2002 Jeanette McKague David Irons Office King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room 1200 Seattle, WA 98104-3272 Re: PROPOSED EVEN DELL ZONE RECLASSIFICATION AND PLAT APPLICATIONS L01 P0016 AND L01TY401 Dear Ms. McKague, Thank you for your letter phone call of May 7, 2002. We appreciate your efforts to help us understand the processes and protocols under which the subject applications are considered. While we struggle to understand the logic behind many of these processes and protocols, we do understand that all parties must operate under these constraints and respect that Mr. Irons has not and will not review our Response to these applications in order to maintain his objectivity in these matters. We will respect this necessity of protocol and endeavor to share this new understanding with our neighbors. We also wish to express our thanks that you have invited our future questions of process. We already have such a question. We have received a letter from Mr. Kipp, director of DDES, which he cc'd to Mr. Irons. Is it appropriate for us to mirror Mr. Kipp's cc in our reply to his letter, or will the public record, in the files for these applications, of our reply be sufficient and the more appropriate method by which to keep Mr. Irons informed? Since~, ~/V£?61ij'--/j tl4--- Gwendolyn High Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Councilmember C.A.R.E. 425.917.0117 CC: Karen Scharer Claussen, Kimberly From: Sent: To: Subject: Highlands Neighbors[SMTP:highlands_neighbors@hotmail.corri] Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:44 AM Kimberly.Claussen@metrokc.gov Evendell Response Follow Up Dear Kimberley Claussen, We and our neighbors delivered a Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat applications to your office April 5th, 2002. We are following up to confirm that you have indeed received our information. We have reviewed and responded to the Evendell applications. We applaud DOES for its commitment to an excellent set of core values. We are pleased to report that we have indeed experienced the benefit of EXCELLENT SERVICE and RESPECT with all ODES personnel with whom we have so far dealt. We are ) heartened to expect FAIRNESS AND CONSISTENCY, INNOVATION, and COMMUNICATION as we approach the consideration of these concerns in the spirit of TEAMWORK. And we are extremely concerned. As our Response shows, we are very worried that the data presented by the developers is laden with errors, omissions, and contradictions. Documents appear to be missing from the public file for these applications. Critical wildlife habitat and the character of our neighborhood, as well as the quality of life and public safety are placed at risk by these proposals. These are very serious issues to us. We live here. We and our neighbors share a responsibility with you to protect the well being of our community. We look forward to constructive cooperation to that end. We request an opportunity speak with you in person about our concerns in these matters. Thank you, Gwendolyn High 425.917.0117 13405 158th Avenue SE Renton WA 98059 Marsha Rollinger 425.277.0245 15646 SE 138th Place Renton WA 98059 Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Evendell (C.A.R.E.) Highlands_Neighbors@hotmail.com Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http·llmobile msn,com '! King County DDES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest· Renton, WA 98055 DROP-OFF FOR LUSD ONLY Cover Sheet *******************IMPORTANT****************** Portion Below MUST BE complete for all drop-off to KC LUSD Staff Project No. Lnl {)CO\ Lo £1;>,.)l;;;, I O 1T'i'.L\O\ Project Name \::.\If !\.I bC: L '- FROM: bv1:1u.Dotii'-l t\1(?\--1 ~of-(;.l\f?..C Company Name/C.ontl!_ct Person Telephone No. 42 5 · 9 I I . 0 I l:J TO: _l='-'1 fllc,_).l...._c.=...=L:.:...,A-'=u'-"S:::.:S:::..sf-.:N..=. =------- Date Received by LUSD rru~~~~w~rry lJll APR O 5 2002 lLl) K.C. D.D.E.S. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KC STAFF Shgrt Plat I Plats Please specify item(s) drop-off Lot Line Adjustment Permit Please specify item(s) drop-off Right of Way Permit Please specify item(s) drop-off _______ · -'£)( 2Z Grading/Gearing Permit Additional Inf. requested, please specify item(s) drop-off · Other: ___________________ _ ****NOTE****** If what you are dropping off is not given on this cover sheet, then please check with a Land Use Technician or our POD. He/She can assist you in determining whom the drop-off should go to, within Land Use Services Division. Karen Scharer -assigne~1DES Planner 4;i' Kim Claussen' -Planner IV', Curren\! Plannir~, Section Trishah Bull -Planner 11,'Current Planning Section Bruce Whittaker -Sr. Engineer, Engineering:Review Section ' . Laura Casey -Sr. Ecologist, Site Development Services King County DOES 900 Oaksdale Avenue SW Renton WA 98055-1219 April 5, 2002 RE: Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01P0016 and L01TY401 Dear ODES Professionals: We are writing to introduce ourselves and our formal Response to a pending Zone Reclassification and Plat Application in our neighborhood. We are Citizens Alliance for a Responsible Evendell. We are the neighbors of the proposed Evendell development. As the Response will show, we have a multitude of grave concerns for the impacts of these proposals. We have expended considerable effort in our review of these applications. As the content of our Response will show, we have attempted to be extremely precise in our requests. We intend this Response to be a formal request for action as well as for information and have clearly labeled the questions to which we seek answers. Determination of the most appropriate persons to whom to address individual questions is beyond the scope of our knowledge. Based on cc: lists of DOES documents in the public files, we have attempted to cc: the correct recipients, but defer to your more complete understanding for any additionally required routing. In the interest of providing advance notice for scheduling purposes, we anticipate significant likelihood that we will be requesting a pre-hearing conference as provided for under KCC 20.21.145. As a principle contributor to our Response, Marsha Rollinger requests consideration of her work-related schedule constraints. She will be out of state from May 17, 2002 to May 26, 2002. Please make the appropriate effort to schedule the pre-hearing conference and the Public Hearing to allow her attendance. We apologize in advance for any errors on our part. None of us are experts in these matters. We have been diligent in our efforts to educate ourselves in the process, policies and protocols of DOES and King County, but inadequacies are likely inevitable. We look forward to your illumination. We would very much appreciate the opportunity to meet with you to discuss these matters personally. Thank you for your time and attention. A~~il:/!-: ~UM~r"- Gwendolyn High and Marsha Rollinger on behalf of Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Evendell Exhibit No, 22. :-:";;-==----,-- 1 t em No. UtfOQ/1,, t/-PITY40/ Received • -a King County Hearing Examiner. 1;;~ Q!lb\Dli\!I L<=Dll.!E CC(Q)l?l'lf ~ V HELP US SAVE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD! u,u1,01hAH.S! !Sith An. SE This Is our HOME. We live here because it is safe and quiet with a old fashioned comfortable character. We wake up to roosters crowing and birds singing. We end our evenings in our large backyards, gating at the stars while the breeze whispers through the trees. We cherish our neighbors -families, children, elders, owls, foxes, woodpeckers, Douglas Firs, hummingbirds, horses, cows, ducks and all the rest. We are fighting to protect them all. «:1t1zen• &mance for a rueoponslble rnvendell Highlands_Neighbors@hotmail.com C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 This formal Response has been compiled from the notes, letters, surveys and conversations of the neighbors to the subject parcels of these applications. The materials contained in it have been prepared and delivered by Gwendolyn High and Marsha Rollinger. The subjects covered are of the highest concern of all citizens involved. We trust that these matters will be considered by the responsible parties with the same level of care we have expended in bringing them to your attention. All assertions stated here are based on our collective understanding of the situation. If we are in error, your knowledgeable correction is most appreciated. This Response contains many specific requests for additional information. The entire neighborhood looks forward to learning the answers. In any case. we would very much value the opportunity to meet in person for more direct discussion. If clarification or additional information is required in order to address our concerns appropriately, please do not hesitate to contact us by any of the following means: Gwendolyn High 425. 917 .0117 Marsha Rollinger 425.277.0245 Highlands_Neighbors@hotmail.com Thank you for your time and attention. Citizens Allied for a Responsible Evendell cc· Karen Scharer -assigned DDES Planner Kim Claussen -Planner Ill, Current Planning Section Trishah Bull -Planner II, Current Planning Section Bruce Whittaker -Sr. Engineer, Engineering Review Section Laura Casev -Sr. Ecoloaist Site Develooment Services Greg Kip Director of DDES Kristen Langley Supervisor, Traffic and Engineering KCDOT David Irons King County Representative District 12 Ron Sims King County Executive Jesse Tanner Mayor of Renton David M. Christensen Wastewater Utility Supervisor Greg Zimmerman Administrator PlanninntBuildina/Public Works enc· Summarv and Point bv Point Resoonse Character of the Neiahborhood Photo Poster Annotated DDES Zonina Mao 13405 158th Avenue SE Renton WA 98059 15646 SE 138th Place Renton WA 98059 King County DDES Land Use Services Division 900 Oaksdale Avenue SW Renton WA 98055-1219 King County DDES Land Use Services Division 900 Oaksdale Avenue SW Renton WA 98055-1219 King County DOT 201 South Jackson St, MS KSC-TR-0222 Seattle WA 98104 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room 1200 Seattle, WA 98104-3272 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room 400 Seattle. WA 98104 City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Four Creeks UAC Summer 2001 Survev Resident Survevs PAnA 1 nf 1R This is what our quiet, tree-filled neighborhood currently looks like ... 11644 1 611111 AH. H 1Sllh Aff, H 1Jff4 Ult~ Aft. H This is what it would change to ... Wh114WH4 <Muy llM .. the OnNnh The proposed llvendell plan DOIIS NOT FIT with the character of our nelghborhoodll This 11 our NOMI. We live here because it is safe and quiet with a old fashioned comfortable character. We wake up to roosters crowing and birds singing. We end our eve nings in our large backyards, gazing at the stars while the breeze whispers through the tre es. We cherish our neighbors • families , children, elders, owls, foxes, woodpeckers, Dougla s Firs, hummingbirds, horses, cows, ducks and all the re s t . We are fighting to protect them all . Citizens Amance for a RHponslble Evendell Highlands_Neighbors@hotmail.com C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Pennit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 This formal Response has been compiled from the notes, letters, surveys and conversations of the neighbors to the subject parcels of these applications. The materials contained in it have been prepared and delivered by Gwendolyn High and Marsha Rollinger. The subjects covered are of the highest concern of all citizens involved. We trust that these matters will be considered by the responsible parties with the same level of care we have expended in bringing them to your attention. All assertions stated here are based on our collective understanding of the situation. If we are in error, your knowledgeable correction is most appreciated. This Response contains many specific requests for additional information. The entire neighborhood looks forward to learning the answers. In any case, we would very much value the opportunity to meet in person for more direct discussion. If clarification or additional information is required in order to address our concerns appropriately, please do not hesitate to contact us by any of the following means: Gwendolyn High 425.917.0117 Marsha Rollinger 425.277.0245 Highlands_Neighbors@hotmail.com Thank you for your time and attention. Citizens Allied for a Responsible Evendell CC· Karen Scharer -assigned DOES Planner Kim Claussen -Planner Ill, Current Planning Section Trishah Bull -Planner II, Current Planning Section Bruce Whittaker -Sr. Engineer, Engineering Review Section Laura Casey -Sr. Ecoloaist Site Develooment Services Greg Kip Director of DOES Kristen Langley Supervisor, Traffic and Engineering KCDOT David Irons King County Representative District 12 Ron Sims King County Executive Jesse Tanner Mayor of Renton David M. Christensen Wastewater Utility Supervisor Greg Zimmerman Administrator Plannina/BuildinA/Public Works enc· Summarv and Point by Point Response Character of the Neiahborhood Photo Poster Annotated ODES Zonina Mao 13405 1581 " Avenue SE Renton WA 98059 15646 SE 138'" Place Renton WA 98059 King County ODES Land Use Services Division 900 Oaksdale Avenue SW Renton WA 98055-1219 King County DOES Land Use Services Division 900 Oaksdale Avenue SW Renton WA 98055-1219 King County DOT 201 South Jackson St, MS KSC-TR-0222 Seattle WA 98104 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room 1200 Seattle, WA 98104-3272 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room 400 Seattle, WA 98104 City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Four Creeks UAC Summer 2001 Survev Resident Survevs P"nA 1 nf 1R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01P0016 and L01TY401 Part I: Summary Incomplete Application Though the letter of September 21, 2001 from Karen Scharer to We request that the listed documentation be Howard Stansbury indicates that these applications had been required and placed in the public file of this determined to be complete, the contents of the public files for these application. applications do not support this assertion. KCC 20.20.040 and the DDES documents named Instructions for Subdivision Applications and Instructions for Zone Reclassification Applications lists documentation required for an application to be deemed complete. The following listed documentation does not exist in the public file for this application: Level-One Drainage Analysis Conceptual Drainage Plan Zone Reclassification Application Form Of particular concern to us is the lack of the Zone Reclassification application and the subsection of this document -Zone Reclassification Application Information and Justification Questionnaire . No NPDES Permit Application is in the public file for this application. We request that the NPDES Permit Application be required and placed in the public file of this aoolication. Errors There are only 4 WIRA drainage basins in all of King County. This We request that parcel location and context application repeatedly indicates the proposed development is in the data presented in this application be reviewed, Green River Basin instead of correctly referencing the Cedar River the assertions of the developers reassessed Basin. and a report of this analysis be made and Street names are incorrectly recorded. placed in the public file. Multiole maos are markina incorrectlv. Developers' Consistent Failure to meet ODES Deadlines At least three extensions have been requested by the Developers for We request that these applications be denied time to respond to the points and disallowances stated in the DDES in accordance to KCC 20.44.030. Wetland Review. No deadline has been met, including the one of March 2, 2002, designated as Final by DDES. On February 26, 2002, DDES granted an additional extension to April 5, 2002, as specifically requested by the Developers. KCC 20.44.030 states "The manager of the building and land development division may set reasonable deadlines for the submittal of information, studies or documents necessary for, or subsequent to, threshold determinations. Failure to meet such deadlines shall cause the application to be deemed withdrawn, and plans and other data previously submitted for review may be returned to the applicant together with any unexpended portion of the application review fees." Environmental and Wildlife Issues The Environmental Checklist prepared and submitted by the We insist that a Mitigated Threshold. Developers, contains no fewer than four answers of "Unknown". Determination of Non-Significance must not The Environmental Checklist question, "List threatened or be submitted nor can it be accepted without endangered species known to be on or near the site" was answered due diligence being done to clarify each of "Unknown", yet in this same application, two Priority Species (black these specific environmental issues listed in tailed deer and ruffed arouse\ and a Candidate Soecies lnileated this Resoonse. PAnA? nf 1R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 woodpecker) were identified in the Wildlife Evaluation and Delineation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation, and Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Plan. The parcels under consideration contain two Class II wetlands, yet only a single amphibian species -(hyla regilla) tree frogs -was observed. The Resident Survey's indicate the known and common presence of owls. No attempt to observe nocturnal animals was made. Vegetation Observation Field Data Forms were submitted with this application. No such Wildlife Field Data Forms were submitted. The following species have been identified as not only inhabiting King County, but also as likely to be found in environments such as have been determined to exist on the parcels in question. More species of sensitive classification are likely to inhabit these parcels. Carex buxbaumii -State Sensitive - http://www. wa. gov/dnr/htdocs/fr/nhp/refdesk/fguide/htm/fsp _ cabu. ht m Carex comosa -State Sensitive -obligate wetland species (USFWS 1988) - http:/ /www.wa.gov/dnr/htdocs/fr/nhp/refdesk/fguide/htm/fsp _ caco. ht m Cimicifuga elata -State Threatened, USFWS Species of Concern - http://www.wa.gov/dnr/htdocs/fr/nhp/refdesk/fguide/htm/fsp_ciel.htm Lycopodium dendroideum -State Sensitive - http://www.wa.gov/dnr/htdocs/fr/nhp/refdesk/fguide/htm/fsp_lyde.htm Platanthera obtusata -State Sensitive -facultative wetland species (USFWS 1988) - http://www.wa.gov/dnr/hldocs/fr/nhp/refdesk/fguide/htm/fsp_plob.htm Utricularia intermedia -State Sensitive - http://www.wa.gov/dnr/htdocs/fr/nhp/refdesk/fguide/htm/fsp_utin.htm (Bufo boreas) -Federal Candidate (1999), State Candidate - http://www.pacificbio.org/ESIN/ReptilesAmphibians/WesternToad/we sterntoad_pg.htm (Ascaphus truei) -Federal Species of Concern, State Species of Concern (WA) - http://www.pacificbio.org/ESIN/ReptilesAmphibiansfTailedFrog/Taile dFrogpg.html E-167 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states "Habitats for species which have been identified as endangered, threatened, or sensitive by the state or federal government shall not be reduced and should be preserved." The proposed Wildlife Habitation Recovery Plan indicates that the return of two species of bird is all that is required for fulfillment of the developers' mitigation requirements. The wildlife figures that they have submitted, and which we dispute as incomplete, list 17 observed species, including mammals et. al. -of which at least two are oarticularlv orotected birds. KCC 21 A.24.190 states "Grading and clearing permits are required for any alteration to a sensitive area or its buffer.'. Further, alteration is defined·as " ... any human -induced activity which results or is likely to result in an impact upon the existing condition of a sensitive area .... " And finally, "Grading 100 cubic yards or more outside sensitive areas also requires a permit... . ." No mention is made of any gradina permits in this annlication. DDES Customer Information Bulletin 26 states "As a final consideration, the DDES planner must try to determine whether a project will, to a significant degree, result in any of the following: a. An adverse effect to environmentallv sensitive or special areas We request that a new Environmental Study, including Wildlife Field Data Forms, to specifically address the lack of reported sightings of nocturnal and hydrophilic species, to search for threatened or endangered species known to reside in habitats in King County similar to those extant on the subject parcels, be conducted by a qualified, independent biologist, reported and placed in the public file. We request that an Environmental Impact Study be prepared, submitted and placed in the public file. We request that the highest protection of the sensitive areas and wildlife provided by law be required for these applications to be approved. We request a more stringent Wildlife Habitation Recovery Plan be required as provided by E- 167 of the King County Comprehensive Plan, as cited above. We request that the status of the grading permits by reported and placed in the public file for this application. We assert that both of these consequences will result from the project as currently proposed. We reauest that strinaent orotections as PAnA :'Inf 1R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 such as the loss or destruction of historic, scientific and cultural provided by law, be required to prevent such resources; parks; prime farmland; wetlands; wild and scenic rivers; destructive outcome. or wilderness; b. An adverse affect on endangered or threatened species or their habitat;" E-173 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states "Stream and We request that the highest protection of the wetland buffer requirements may be increased to protect pecies of sensitive areas and wildlife provided by law be local importance, as listed in this chapter, and their habitats, as required for these applications to be approved. annrooriate. Non Compliance with King County Development and Design Standards We assert that this application provides inadequate planning We request that modifications to this documentation for several design requirements, particularly under application be required to bring this proposal the following points of Recreational Space, Wildlife Habitat into compliance with all current King County Corridors, and Sensitive Areas Protection: Development Standards. Chapter 21 A.14 Recreational Space: E. 1-4 F. 1 &2 H. 1 &2 Chapter 21 A.14.260 Wildlife Habitat Corridors Chapter 21 A.24 Sensitive Areas Protection (htlp://207.68.162.250/cgi- bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=67c62ce8c93f98b614dc975bf4a9898b&lat =1015373407&hm_action=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2emetrokc%2e gov%2fmkcc%2fCode%2f21A14%2d16%2epdf) http://www6.metrokc.gov/case/198p0018%20rpt. doc http://www6.metrokc.gov/case/198p0024%20rpt.doc htto://www6.metrokc.oov/case/198o0043%20rot.doc U-131 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states "Urban We request that design changes be required to residential neighborhood design should preserve historical and provide increased safety and facility for natural characteristics and neighborhood identity, while preserving pedestrians and bicyclists as well as to privacy, community space, and safety and mobility of pedestrians preserve the existing conditions of privacy to and bicyclists. adjacent properties. U-133 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states " New urban residential developments should provide recreation space, community facilities and neighborhood circulation for pedestrians -and bicyclists. Approval of an increased zoning density will be inconsistent with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. Privacy will be greatly reduced. The proposed design will result in increased risk to pedestrians and bicvclists. Zoning Piecemeal zoning demands that decisions by made for which careful We request that the regulations -the law - and coordinated consideration by the King County Council is not currently in place be enforced. possible. Zoning and Land Uses issues can not be successfully addressed one at a time. These issues can not be isolated from each other or from other areas. The County Council has wisely made provision for this fact. King County has a Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Plans which are re-evaluated on a regular schedule. The latest Annual Growth Report indicates the successes and challenges that our area faces under these policies. Ron Sims has identified several key issues, of which" ... air quality, stream water quality and habitat conservation continue to be major challenges .... Restoring salmon runs is our laraest environmental challenae. The total PAnA 4 nf 1R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 number of natural-spawning adult Chinook in the Cedar River / Lake Washington watershed reached a new low of 120 in 2000, after a low of 240 in 1999. Overall, the average of runs in the 1990s is about one-half the average during the 1980s. " King County is obligated by state and federal law to enforce wildlife and sensitive area protections. Ron Sims' statements show the need for even greater vigilance in this enforcement than has previously been achieved. U-120 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states "King County We request that the Application for Zone shall not approve proposed zoning changes to increase density Reclassification be denied and that current within the Urban area unless: zoning regulations be maintained and enforced. a. The development will be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhood; " We intend the materials in this Response to demonstrate that the proposed increased zoning density is distinctly incompatible with the established character of the surroundina neiahborhood. Drainage The proposed development is to be located on two parcels We request an evaluation of this situation by completely surrounded by an established neighborhood in which all the King County Community Environmental the houses have individual septic tank systems. We are greatly Health department be conducted and the concerned that the significant increase of impervious surface will findings of that study be placed in the public file dramatically increase runoff and severely adversely affect our for this application. existing systems. This is of even more critical concern to us since there are two Class II wetlands on the subject parcels. Any damage to these systems will certainly negatively affect runoff in our neighborhood. In addition, we are concerned that in the event of severely increased runoff, and any subsequent septic system failure, there would be significant damage to the Cedar River as it is directly downstream from us. Properties to the south of the proposed site of development have a We request an evaluation of this situation by history of damage from the existing drainage infrastructure. No the King County Water and Land Resources mention of the Drainage Complaint History related to these parcels Division be conducted and the findings of that is mentioned in this application. study be placed in the public file for this annlication. -Annexation City of Renton has indicated its intent to supply sanitary sewer We request that this conditional statement be service on the express condition that "the property owner(s) will be reviewed, reevaluated and the official findings required to execute a covenant to annex form'. of the relevant municipalities be placed in the http:l/seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/63742_nnex25.shtml public file for this application. http://seattietimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/134420701 _ annex ation1 Sm.html In light of the Washington State Supreme Court ruling of March 14, 2002, we believe that the condition required by City of Renton in order to provide sanitary sewer constitutes a kind of prior restraint and is in direct conflict with this rulino. Traffic City of Renton has approved, or is now processing applications for, We request that a new Traffic Study, 1769 single family residences for the Renton Highlands area alone. specifically considering the known expected DDES's Search and Report on Permit Applications website traffic impacts of the projected new (http:l/www6.metrokc.govlddes/scripts/permsearch.cfm) indicates development on this hill, as well as the specific approval or current consideration of 254 comparable units in this adverse effects to the function of 156th Ave SE area /Newcastle Communitv Plannina Area) since 2001. in reaards to its utilitv as a desianated Life Line P"n" <; nf 1 R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01P0016 and L01TY401 Approved 2001 http://www6. metrokc. govlddes/scripts/permdetail. cfm? permit_ no=LO OP0009 -60 units http:/lwww6.metrokc.govlddes/scripls/permdetail.cfm?permit_no=LO 1P0002-14 units http://www6. metrokc. govlddes/scripts/permdetail.cfm? permit_ no=L9 9P3008 -49 units Approved 2002 http:llwww6.metrokc.govlddes/scripts/permdetail.cfm?permit_no=LO OP0016 -14 units Under Consideration http:llwww6.metrokc.govlddes/scripts/permdetail.cfm?permit_no=LO OP0023 -5 units http:llwww6.metrokc.govlddes/scripts/permdetail.cfm?permit_no=LO OP0024 -37 units http:llwww6.metrokc.govlddes/scripls/permdetail.cfm?permit_no=LO 1P0016 -75 units (this is the Evendell application) This comes to a total of at least 2023 new single family residences. These additions to our community are in no way accounted for in the submitted Traffic Plan for this development. In an area of already severely limited access, largely due to geology and topography, our roads are already pressed for capacity. An additional critical traffic factor to consider is that King County has designated 156th Ave SE as a Life Line Route. As such, traffic impact considerations to this critically designated arterial must be held to a higher degree of scrutiny. Inadequate roads and transportation access to this area are on- going concerns of all the citizens of this neighborhood. The Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council has and continues to expend considerable effort to address this issue. http://www. fourcreeksuac. org/issues. html http://www.fourcreeksuac.org/pasU1-22-02ER.html The Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council Survey for Summer 2001 very clearly illustrates the extreme dissatisfaction of the citizens of our area with development in general, and its subsequent traffic in definite particular. htto://www.fourcreeksuac.ora/survevresults.html T-316 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states "King County· should included nonmotorized transportation when general transportation improvements are made, including road construction, reconstruction, subdivision development and development of new transit systems. T-317 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states 'New land use plans, subdivisions and urban planned development proposals should include enhancements to nonmotorized mobility and access. T-318 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states 'King County design standards should allow flexibility in selecting, and the authority to require designed features that benefit nonmotorized safetv and accessibilitv. T-321 of the King County Comprehensive Plan states "King County should seek to imorove oedestrian safetv both within residential Route, be conducted, reported and placed in the public file for this application. We request that the highest requirement for provision of facilities for nonmotorized transportation provided by law be required for these applications to be approved. We request that sidewalks be required to ensure the safetv of the student residents of the PAnA fl nf 1R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 areas and at arterials near pedestrian activity centers such as proposed development. schools. retail centers, concentrations of housing, transit facilities and trails .... To foster safe walking conditions for students, King Countv should continue the School Walkwav Proaram. Aesthetics ODES Customer Information Bulletin 17A refers to KCC 21A.16 and We request that the "appropriate use of says that 'Appropriate use of landscaping promotes privacy, creates landscaping" be required in order to preserve and visual and sound buffer, increases aesthetic value and deters the current levels of privacy, to provide erosion.' adequate buffers for adjacent properties and to at least maintain the current aesthetic value afforded by the subject parcels in their current state. Local Infrastructure and Level of Service Issues ODES Customer Information Bulletin 17A refers to KCC 21A.28 says We request that the statement of school that it 'contains adequacy and school concurrency standards ... . adequacy and concurrency be required and No documentation of adequacy and school concurrency for this placed in the public file of this application. annlication is in the oublic file. The Resident Surveys submitted with this Response and the Four We request the Application for Zone Creeks Summer 2001 Survey indicate grave concern by residents of Reclassification be denied due to the current our neighborhood for an adequate level of service from our local inadequate levels of service in our subarea and Fire, Police, and School infrastructure. We consider the current the low priority presently assigned to rectify the levels of service inadequate. The situation resulting from granting existing situation. the requested rezone would be completely unreasonable. The Four Creeks Summer 2001 Survey shows that the top four concerns of all the citizens in our area are DevelopmenUGrowth, Traffic/Congestion, Land Use/Zoning, and Environment. The comments detail specific inadequacies in and concerns for the capacity of our neighborhood to support more demands on our local infrastructure. According to the Community Action Strategies -Subarea Priority Ranking Map created by tha King County Department of Transportation, our area is in line behind at least four high priority areas and one medium priority area for any retrofit or new capacity improvements. This indicates that our bad situation will continue to . get far worse before there is any attempt at correction. Approving even higher densitv zonina is uniustifiable in liaht of these facts. PAm::i 7 nf 1R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 Part II: Point By Point Review of Application Materials Alternate Plot Map (44 Units) We request that this credit not be allowed. Required Recreational Space Reduction Section IV indicates that the total required Recreational Space is 17160 square feet. However, Tract F, specified as this Recreational Space, is only 8987 square feet. Section V indicates that there is an allowed deduction of area from the required Recreational space equal to the area with in the Stormwater Control Facility. This map indicates that the Stormwater Control Facility is completely enclosed and inaccessible to anyone. No recreational use is afforded bv the Stormwater control facilitv. Environmental Checklist Page 2 (A.7) "Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain." Many of our neighbors have reported that US Land has approached them repeatedly with aggressive offers to buy their property. We consider this answer to be incorrect. Page 4 (1. f.) "There will be the potential for erosion due to the construction of the site. This potential will be mitigated through implementation of an erosion control/water management plan using Best Management Practices." Page 5 (3.a.2.) "Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters?" Page 5 (3.a.6.) "Pollutants associated with typical urban residential developments may eventually make their way to surface waters.' Page 6 (3.c.2.) "Pollutants associated with typical urban residential developments may eventually make their way to surface waters." Recent scientific findings demand more stringent consideration of the environmental impacts of residential runoff. Particular concern is warranted for the runoff of lawn chemicals into the two Class II wetlands. Pollutants have been reachino streams and rivers from residential We request that clarification and justification of this statement be required, reported and placed in the public file for this application. We request that the full text and all plans of the referenced Erosion Mitigation Plan be submitted and placed in the public file for this application. We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • What are the actual distances to the Wetland boundaries from construction? • What are the actual distances to the Wetland boundaries from all construction activities such as equipment movement, parking, surface disturbance, materials storage? • What ·specific legislation allows the indicated encroachments? o The question in this Environmental Checklist asks about work within 200 feet. In light of this measure, why have the buffers been requested to be set at 32.5 feet? We request that stringent protection of the wetlands from residential runoff be required. P~nA A nf 1R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01P0016 and L01 TY 401 developments through surface waters etc. This site drains directly into the Lower Cedar River Basin that is home to salmon. A recent article was in the Seattle Times showing how pharmaceuticals are even making it into rivers and streams. http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi- bin/texis. cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=pollute 13&date=20020313&qu erv=rivers Page 7 (4. b.) "What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?" Page 7 (4, c.) "List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site" Two Priority Species (black tailed deer and ruffed grouse) and a Candidate Species (pileated woodpecker) were identified in the Wildlife Evaluation and Delineation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation, and Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Plan. Page 7 (4. d.) 'Proposed ... measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the site, if any" Page 7 (5. a.) "Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site:· The Resident Surveys submitted with this Response indicate a very rich wildlife community in and around the subject parcels, No nocturnal studies were attempted for this application and the only amphibians found were tree frogs. We assert that the wildlife studies submitted for this application are incomplete and grossly inadequate. We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application, • What percentage of vegetation and sod is expected to be removed? • To what depth will the surface be 'stripped'? • What are the King County specified limitations to this? • Why are no Clearing and Grading permits present in the public file for these aoolications? We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • What research was conducted to satisfy this question? • What justification is the there for the answer given -"Unknown"? • What specific legislation allows the indicated answer to be adequate? • Why is conflicting data listed elsewhere in this annlication? We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • What is the exact definition of 'typical Pacific Northwest plantings" given as the answer to this question? • What is the specific applicability to the mitigation of the disruption and destruction of the existing habitats of Conifer Upland Forest, Persistent Lowland Shrub and Deciduous Forested Wetland? We request that a new Environmental Study, including Wildlife Field Data Forms, to specifically address the lack of reported sightings of nocturnal and hydrophilic species, to search for threatened or endangered species known to reside in habitats in King County similar to those extant on the subject parcels, be conducted by a qualified, independent biologist, reported and placed in the public file, We request that a Mitigated Threshold Determination of Non-Significance must not be submitted nor can it be accepted without due diligence being done to clarify each of these soecific environmental issues. P~nA Q nf 1R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 Page 8 (5. b.) We request that answers to the following "List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the questions be required and placed in the public site" file for this application. 0 What research was conducted to satisfy this question? 0 What justification is the there for the answer given -"Unknown"? 0 What specific legislation allows the indicated answer to be adequate? 0 Why is conflicting data listed elsewhere in this application? Two Priority Species (black tailed deer and ruffed grouse) and a Candidate Species (pileated woodpecker) were identified in the Wildlife Evaluation and Delineation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation, and Compensatory Wetland Mitiaation Plan. Page 8 (5. c.) We request that answers to the following "Is the site part of a migration route?" questions be required and placed in the public ,· file for this application. 0 What research was conducted to satisfy this question? 0 What justification is the there for the answer given -"Unknown"? 0 What specific legislation allows the indicated answer to be adeouate? Page 8 (5. d.) We request that answer to the following "Proposed ... measures to preserve or enhance wildlife at the site, if question be required and placed in the public any' file for this application. 0 What specific activities will address and redress the loss and disruption of established habitat and wildlife corridors? Page B (6.b.) We request that answer to the following "Land clearing may improve the solar access by adjoining question be required and placed in the public properties." file for thi~ application. 0 What specific activities will address and redress the loss and disruption of established habitat and wildlife corridors? Page 9 (7. b.2.) We request that answers to the following "What types and level of noise would be created by and associated questions be required and placed in the public with the project ... ?' file for this application. The stated hours of construction activity are completely and totally 0 What specific regulations allow the hours unacceptable to the residents of this neighborhood. listed, 7am to 10pm Monday through Saturday, for construction in a residential neighborhood? 0 What options are available for further restrictions for the protection of the neiahbors and communitv? Page 9 (8. b.) We request that answers to the following "Has the site been used for agriculture?" questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. 0 What research was conducted to satisfv this P:::inA 1 0 nf 1 A C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 question? • What justification is the there for the answer given -"Unknown"? • What specific legislation allows the indicated answer to be ad=uate? Page 10 (8. h.) We request that answer to the following "Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally question be required and placed in the public sensitive area"? file for this application. • Does not a designation of Class II Wetland qualify as an "environmentally sensitive area"? Page 10 (8. I.) We assert that the proposed rezone is directly "The proposal complies with current comprehensive plans and is in and distinctly incompatible with the established character with future development proximate to the site." character of our neighborhood. The question is "Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is We request that the application for Rezone be compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any" denied. We assert the importance of the "existing" portion of this question. Within a two block radius of the subject parcels we have counted flocks of ducks, geese, and goats as well as 20 horses, 6 cows, 2 llamas, and at least 3 roosts of chickens. This proposed development site is completely surrounded by an existing well established neighborhood with a definite rural flavor. Page 11 (10.b.) We request that significant landscape buffers "Views over or inward to the project site will be altered from the be required on all boundaries to adjacent forest and pasture to modern. well designed homes and landscaped properties. yards." The neighbors to these parcels consider the existing views as extremely valuable. Some property owners have made substantial . investments to their own properties to eniov these views. Page 11 (10. b. and c.) We request that answers to the following "The project proposes 7 4 new, modern, well-designed homes and questions be required and placed in the public landscaped yards." file for this application. "What views in the immediate vicinity will be altered or obstructed?" "Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any?" • What specific protections will undertaken to preserve views currently actively enjoyed by neighbors? • Some neighbors have made investments to specifically enjoy these views. • What compensation should they expect to offset this loss? • Elsewhere in this application, the number of proposed new homes is more commonly exnressed as 75. What is the real number? Page 11 (11.a. and 11.c) We request that lighting covenants be required "Light and Glare" of all new residents. The relative lack of light pollution of any kind in this neighborhood is a very significant aesthetic issue for current residents. We do not We request that light pollution mitigation be have streetlights. reouired in the annroved buildino clans. Page 11 (12.b) We request that light pollution mitigation and "Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses" adequate habitat protections be required in the approved building plans. Birdwatching and stargazing will be devastated. These activities are greatly enjoyed by the owners of the surrounding properties. The ability to engaoe in these recreational oursuits are kev indicators of P~nA 11 nf 1A C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 the character of our neighborhood. Page 11 (12. c.) We request that answers to the following "Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation ... " questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. The area of proposed recreational space reported recorded here matches neither the initial nor the alternate plat proposal. • What is the real proposed area for recreational space? • Why are these numbers inconsistently reoorted? Page 12 (14. a.) We request that answers to the following "Identify public streets and highways serving this site, and describe questions be required and placed in the public proposed access to the existing street systems ... " file for this application. • What impact will there be to neighbors residing on the currently dead end 158th Ave SE? • What impact will there be to the utility of 156th Ave SE in its capacity of King County Life Line Route? • Why does the Traffic Report in this application neglect to consider the impending impact of greater than 2000 single family residences currently planned for this hill? Page 12 (16.a.) We request that this conditional statement be "Circle utilities currently available at the site" reviewed, reevaluated and the official findings of the relevant municipalities be placed in the Sanitary sewer is NOT currently available. public file for this application. In light of the Washington State Supreme Court ruling of March 14, 2002, we assert that the condition required by City of Renton constitutes a kind of orior restraint. Page 13 (15. a. and b.) We request that answers to the following "Would the project result in an increased need for public services ... ?" questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. The Resident Surveys submitted with this Response indicate a significant concern that our local services will be severely taxed by • Who will be responsible for these increased the proposed development. costs1 • What mechanisms for impact fees and/or comparable remedies can be required of the developer and/or eventual homeowners? • Will these costs fall to existing citizens? • What recourse do existing residents have to onnose such unfair financial burdens? Plat of Evendell -Wetland Review Laura Casey Senior Ecologist Site Development Services Paragraph 3 We request that answer to the following "Construction of SE 136th Street for access to this property would fill question be required and placed in the public 200 square feet of wetland and encroach on about 4600 square feet file for this application. of buffer. This impact could potentially be minimized by reducing the width of the required road improvements and by using construction • What specific portions of the submitted Plat techniques to limit fill in the wetland." Proposals indicate these actions will be undertaken? Paragraph 4 We request that the lot boundaries be required "This is not an "unavoidable intrusion" into the buffer as stated in the to be redrawn. P.Am::t 1? nf 1A C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Pennit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 Wetland Report. It can easily be avoided by redrawing the lot boundaries to provide the minimum 50 foot buffer. Buffer averaging can only be permitted when it provides "additional protection .. ." This intrusion into the buffer cannot be allowed under existing reaulations. Wildlife Evaluation and Oeliniation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation, and Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Plan Executive Summary page 2 paragraph 2 We request that answer to the following "Buffer averaging will be used ... Such averaging will provide question be required and placed in the public additional protection to wetlands and enhance the wetland's file for this application. function" 0 What are the specific justifications for the " ... improvements in the existing right-of-way ... will require the request to allow this extreme degree of unavoidable filling of the northern 200 square feet of Wetland A and buffer averaging? the reduction of the buffer associated with this area of the wetland.· The Plat of Evendell -Wetland Review specifically refutes these assertions and clearly states alternatives -this is not an "unavoidable intrusion". Page 2 State of Washington Stream Catalog We request that parcel location and context "This mapping resource did identify the Green River to the south of data presented in this application be reviewed, the Project site." the assertions of the developers reassessed and a report of this analysis be made and The site is not in, adjacent to nor is it in any way otherwise placed in the public file. associated with the Green River Basin. This site in part of the Cedar River Basin svstem. Page 3 Aerial Photo Analysis We request that parcel location and context "This deciduous foresVshrub community appeared to continue offsite data presented in this application be reviewed, to the south until reaching the top of the slope leading in the Green the assertions of the developers reassessed River Valley." and a report of this analysis be made and placed in the public file. The site is not in, adjacent to nor is it in any way otherwise associated with the Green River Basin. This site in part of the Cedar We request that protection for this corridor River Basin system. function be required. We assert that this statement indicates the vital wildlife corridor utility - of these plots. Page 4 Field Observation We request that answer to the following question be required and placed in the public file for this application. 0 No mention is made of mycological studies. Are any such data required? Page 8 Onsite Wetland Evaluation -Water Quality Benefits We request that answers to the following "The primary water quality benefit provided by this wetland appeared questions be required and placed in the public to be a very limited amount of biofiltration of surface stormwater." file for this application. 0 What measurements were taken? 0 What pollutants and concentrations of them were identified on the input side? the output? 0 What specific benefit is provided for the livestock runoff produced by the existing horse pasture on 158th Avenue SE? Pai:ie 9 Wildlife Studv Methods oaraaraoh 1 We reauest that answer to the followino Pi:1nA 1~ nf 1R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01 P0016 and L01TY401 "This assessment included both early morning and late afternoon observations." Page 9 Wildlife Study Methods paragraph 2 "These more mobile species may depend more upon adjacent habitat for more critical habitat needs such as nesting and cover from predators." "It is unlikely based upon the existing site conditions, coupled with adjacent land uses, that species which require large areas of undisturbed habitat would exist onsite." We assert that there is no adjacent habitat that is suitable for the purposes stated. Black tailed deer and coyotes are listed in the observed species lists. While neither of these species is likely to be strictly confined to these parcels for their complete lifecycles, it can be argued that movement through these parcels along the·aforementioned forested corridor to the Cedar River valley is likely necessary for their continued existence. Page 1 O Plant and Animal Species Observations This section lists a single amphibian (tree frog), but no reptile or macro invertebrates. Yet a significant area of these parcels is identified as a Class II wetland. We assert that this data is incomplete. Page 11 Plant and Animal Species Observations paragraph 2 "These stumps and snags appeared well utilized as feeding areas by a wide variety of avian species, particularly hairy woodpeckers, creepers and Northern flicker. A few of these snags also exhibited a limited use by pileated woodpecker (Drpocopus pileatus)." No fewer than four very large dead trees are visible from the west side of the subject parcels, the 160th Ave SE side. Two are right next to the Proposed Land Use sign, which display extensive signs of woodpecker utilization. At least one of these sites is large enough to accommodate an owl or other bird of prey. Please see the attached photos. Page 12 Movement Corridors "Wetland A also appeared to serve as a movement corridor for a wide variety of wildlife species.· Wildlife corridors have been identified by KCC 21A.14.260 and KCC 21A.14.270 for specific protection in King County's commitment to environmental protection. htto://www.metrokc.aov/MKCC/Code/21A14-16.nnf Page 12 Priority Species "Two wildlife species identified by the State of Washington as "Priority Species" were observed onsite during the assessment... Black tailed deer and ruffed grouse ... The project site may also provide habitat for ... morning dove and band-tailed pigeon." question be required and placed in the public file for this application. • What consideration of nocturnal species is reauired? We request specific documentation be required to support this assertion of the developers. We request that protection for this corridor function be required. We request that a new Environmental Study, including Wildlife Field Data Forms, to specifically address the lack of reported sightings of nocturnal and hydrophilic species, to search for threatened or endangered species known to reside in habitats in King County similar to those extant on the subject parcels, be conducted by a qualified, independent bioloaist reported and placed in the public file. We request specific investigation of these dead trees, by a qualified independent biologist, to determine the specific wildlife utilization. We request requirement that this corridor's function be maintained intact. We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • What specific protections are in place for these creatures? • Bv what means will these orotections be P::::am:~ 1.4 nf 1A \ ' ,> Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Evendell Hlghlands_Nelghbors@hotmall.com Maya, 2002 Michael Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 alh Drive SE Bothell WA 98021 . "' ' ~ Re: PROPOSED EVENDELL ZONE RECLASSIFICATION AND PLAT APPLICATIONS L01P0016 AND L01TY401 Dear Mr. Romano, With this letter we hope to introduce ourselves and our concerns about the pending applications listed above. We are the owners of the vast majority of properties surrounding the subject parcels for which development has been proposed. We are not opposed to this subdivision and development. We hope to participate in this process in order to protect our neighbors, our properties and the welfare and safety of our community so that we may look forward to welcoming our new Evendell neighbors to the community we love so very much. We have spent the last few months in vigilant effort to educate ourselves in the processes and protocols involved in the consideration of these applications, as well as to familiarize ourselves with the specifics of your proposals. Karen Scharer at ODES has told us that she has forwarded our initial Response to your office. We hope that you have had a chance to review it. Since our initial submission, we have learned that you have presented additional material for consideration. We have begun to review this new data and we appreciate the evident effort that has been expending in the preparation of the new plans. However, we do still have considerable concern for the impacts that we expect from this proposed development. We would very much appreciate the opportunity to discuss these concerns with you in person, and to present recommendations which we hope you will incorporate into the final plans which we believe will greatly facilitate the smooth incorporation of these many homes to our community. We will make every effort to accommodate meeting arrangements of your convenience, and look forward to productive dialog in these matters. Thaink yo.u for your time and attention, /t/, /, ·' / / 7-'/ft,:,t t:,t;f"fjl ~1-~ 7,/ I ~;/-......._ Gwendolyn High.?" <f · Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Councilmember CARE. 425.917.0117 cc: Karen Sharer / This is what our quiet, tree-filled neighborhood currently looks like ... SE 138t h PL· Trees I n back on proposed Even dell site... 13012 158t h Ave . SE 13405 158th Ave . SE 1 S646 SE 138th Pl . 13110 158th Ave. SE 134U 158th Ave. SE 13644 160th Ave . SE WlndWoo d 13112 158th Ave. SE 13152 158th Ave . SE Some neighborhoo d livestock 13527 156th Ave. SE 13582 132nd PL 13616 156t h Av e . SE 158th Ave. SE Adjoining Proposed Even dell Sit e on 160th Ave. SE 13004 158th Ave . SE Ch erry Lane at th e Or ch ard s WlndWood Wlnd song The proposed Evendell plan DOES NOT FIT with the character of our neighborhood!! This is our HOME. We live here because it is safe and quiet with a old fashioned comfortable character. We wake up to roosters crowing and birds singing . We end our evenings in our large backyards, gazing at the stars while the breeze whispers through the trees. We cherish our ne ighbors -families, children, elders, owls, foxes, woodpeckers, Douglas Firs , hummingbirds, horses, cows , ducks and all the rest . We are fighting to protect them al l. Citizens Alliance for a Responsible Evendell Highlands_Neighbors @hotmail.com C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01P0016 and L01TY401 Page 12 State Candidate Species "A single "State Candidate· species-the pileated woodpecker- was observed ... • Page 13 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-Section 404 "For the purposes of Section 404 permitting the Corps makes the final determination as to whether an area meets wetland definition and would be subject to regulation under the Corps program." Page 14 Roadway Improvements Points 1 , 2 and 4 list conditions required for King County to allow a roadway to cross a wetland or associated buffer. The Plat of Evendell -Wetland Review specifically indicates several factors which will not allow the requested intrusions into the wetland and its buffer zones. Page 15 Selected Action Plan paragraph 2 "Through averaging, the buffer on the west side of the wetland will be reduced to 32.5 feet... Through buffer averaging these unavoidable intrusions into the standard buffer areas will be fully compensated ... • 32.5 feet is exactly the minimum allowed by law -65% of the mandated value. This allows zero margin of error. Additionally, the statement regarding "unavoidable intrusion· is erroneously asserted. The Plat of Evendell -Wetland Review specifically states: "This is not an "unavoidable intrusion" into the buffer as stated in the Wetland Report. It can easily be avoided by redrawing the lot boundaries to provide the minimum 50 foot buffer. Buffer averaging can only be permitted when it provides "additional protection ... • This intrusion into the buffer cannot be allowed under existing reaulations. Page 15 Selected Action Plan paragraph 3 • ... extending the existing 158th Avenue South roadway .. ." The road name is 158th Avenue Southeast, and as the Resident Surveys submitted with this Response indicate, the extension is strongly opposed by the neighbors. Page 16 Selected Action Plan paragraph 3 • ... these unavoidable intrusions into the wetland and standard buffer areas will be fully compensated ..... ." The Plat of Evendell -Wetland Review specifically states: "This is not an "unavoidable intrusion" into the buffer as stated in the Wetland Report. It can easily be avoided by redrawing the lot boundaries to orovide the minimum 50 foot buffer. Buffer averaaina enforced? We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • What specific protections are in place for these creatures? • By what means will these protections be enforced? We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • Has application been filed for the Corps determination of jurisdiction? • If so, what is the current status of the application. • If not so whv not? We request that the lot boundaries must be redrawn. This intrusion into the buffer cannot be allowed under existing regulations. We request that the lot boundaries be required to be redrawn . We request that this extension of 158th Avenue SE be denied. We request that parcel location and context data presented in this application be reviewed, the assertions of the developers reassessed and a report of this analysis be made and placed in the oublic file. We request that the lot boundaries be required to be redrawn. P~nA 1~ nf 1A C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Pennit Applications L01P0016 and L01TY401 can only be permitted when it provides "additional protection .. ." This intrusion into the buffer cannot be allowed under existing reQulations. Page 16 Elements of the Compensatory Mitigation Plan paragraph 2 " ... wetland area to be unavoidably modified ... As compensation for this unavoidable impact..." The Plat of Evendell -Wetland Review specifically states: "This is not an "unavoidable intrusion· into the buffer as stated in the Wetland Report. It can easily be avoided by redrawing the lot boundaries to provide the minimum 50 foot buffer. Buffer averaging can only be permitted when it provides "additional protection .. ." This intrusion into the buffer cannot be allowed under existing regulations. Page 18 Description of the Compensatory Mitigation Program 8. "The outer boundary of the wetland buffer will be marked and fenced to limit intrusion into these areas: Page 19 Objective B. Performance Criteria (first) Page 19 Objective B. Performance Criteria (second) "The compensatory mitigation area will be used for cover by at least two species of passerine birds common to the area within five years of completion of construction of the mitigation area.• The record of observed species stated in this application lists seventeen different species -including 2 Priority Species and 1 Candidate Species. These Performance Criteria list requirements for birds only. We find these Perfonnance Criteria entirely inadequate and wholly uniustifiable Page 20 paragraph 2 "Primary features offered by the selected mitigation plan includes ... oreater diversity of plant soecies and olant associations We request that the lot boundaries be required to be redrawn. We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • Will any portion of the area to be fenced and protected from intrusion be used in the calculation of stormwater control facilities being used to justify the application for reduction of required Recreational Space? We assert that this is not a suitable substitution of recreational space. We request that any such request for recreational space substitution be denied. We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • What is the current inventory of comparable habitat characteristics as those described here? • Whaf percentage of the current figure are the proposed aggregated habitat features? • What percentage is mandated by law? • What percentage is required to provide habitat for the creatures to be displaced by construction? We request that answer to the following question be required and placed in the public file for this application. • What mitigation is required for mammals, amphibians, reptiles and plants? We request that answer to the following question be required and placed in the public file for this aoolication. PAnA 1n of 1A C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01P0016 and L01 TY 401 greater diversity of wildlife habitats." This does not address the loss of currently existing habitat. The current habitats, according to this very report, include Conifer Upland Forest Persistent Lowland Shrub and Deciduous Forested Wetland. Page 20 Summary Table of Wetland Functional Benefits "Establishment of a diverse plant community and habitat features within the wetland and buffer areas.• This does not address the loss of currently existing habitat. The current habitats, according to this very report, include Conifer Upland Forest, Persistent Lowland Shrub and Deciduous Forested Wetland. Page 20 Selected Plant Communities Page 21 Construction Inspection Page 22 Construction Sequence All tasks listed in this table are shown with dates indicating that all actions have been completed already. Page 24 Vegetation Monitoring Sequencing Again, incorrect dates are listed. Page 27 Figures Figure 1 Site Vicinity The circle indicating the secondary parcel is drawn on the east side of the primary parcel. In reality, the secondary parcel is on the west side of the primary parcel. Page 29 Appendix A Field Data Forms Field data is presented for veaetation onlv. • What exact habitat designations will exist on these parcels after construction? We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • What exact habitat designations will exist on these parcels after construction? • What wholly new designations will exist after construction? · We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • Which of these species are native species? • Which are specifically applicable to the mitigation of the disruption and destruction of the existing habitats of Conifer Upland Forest, Persistent Lowland Shrub and Deciduous Forested Wetland? We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • Who has jurisdictional oversight of this responsibility? • What are the options for community review? • What will be the period of inspection by a county official? • What are the consequences for failure to meet reauirements? We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application. • Where did these dates come from? • How many of such comparable errors are allowed in an aoolication to be aooroved? We request that answers to the following questions be required and placed in the public file for this application . • Where did these dates come from? • How many of such comparable errors are allowed in an aoolication to be aooroved? We request that parcel location and context data presented in this application be reviewed, the assertions of the developers reassessed and a report of this analysis be made and placed in the public file . We request that a new Environmental Study, including Wildlife Field Data Forms, to specifically address the lack of reported siahtinas of nocturnal and hvdrophilic species PAnA 17 nf 1R C.A.R.E. Response to the Proposed Evendell Zone Reclassification and Plat Permit Applications L01P0016 and L01TY401 to search for threatened or endangered species known to reside in habitats in King County similar to those extant on the subject parcels, be conducted by a qualified, independent biolooist reported and placed in the oublic file. P::inA 1R nf 1R REPORT OF FOUR CREEKS UAC SURVEY, SUMMER 2001 http ://www .fourcreeksuac.org/surveyresults.html Prepared by Kate Kaluzny September 2001 Describe your community: A good place to live: 29 (47 .5%). An excellent place to live: 22 (36.1 %). Prefer to live somewhere else: 4 (6.6%). Other (Please elaborate): 4 (6.6%). *We would like to live farther from SE 128th because it is like an interstate . *The quality oflife has been going downhill for the last 3 years . *I loved it in 1993 , but too many new developments and getting too much traffic. *Not as good as it was before growth of the area. No Response : 2 (3 .3%). Concerns: 12. 5% Development/Growth 11 .9% Traffic/Congestion 8 .0% Land Use/Zoning 7 .0% Environment 2.1% Too much environmental regulation 4 .6% Too little environmental regulation .3% Other: "Keep more open spaces." 6.9%,Roads 5.5% Taxes 4.90/o Building Regulations 4.0% Crime 3.5% Education 3.4% Speeding/Other Traffic Violation 3.2% Endangered Species Act 3 .1% Parks 2 .6% Public Transit 2 .6% Law Enforcement 2.5% Sewer/Septic 2 .1 % Surface Water Management 2.0% Landfill 2.0°/c, Churches/Schools in Rural Area 1. 6% Drug Abuse/ Alcoholism 1.3% Recreational Facilities/Programs 1.3% Library 1. 0% Government Services 1.00/o Housing J . 00/o Composting Company .8% Discrimination on the basis of race or ethnicity .!%Housing .3% Employment .3% Other: "and influence" .8% Domestic Violence .7%RTA . 7% Services/Housing for the Elderly . 7% Mental Illness .3% Services/Housing for the Disabled 1.8% Other Concerns : .3% "Noise from gun club." .3% "Ability to keep horse (i.e., rural lifestyle) and access to public trails (i.e., concern that some trails are no longer available for horse use)." (14500 block of Cedar Grove Rd .) .3% "SE Bypass (I'm against) and effect on Issaquah-Hobart area." (16200 block oflssaquah-Hobart Rd .) .3% "Continuing annexations into City of Renton should stop ." .3% "Need to address the litter problem along 128th--organize neighborhood clean-up days-pick up litter, etc." .2% "Air quality : Would like to see permanent county-wide burn ban. Isn't the air grand this summer." (13700 block of240th Ave . S .E .) .2% "Need mandatory garbage collection ." NOTE the concerns were scored as follows : There were 30 general areas of concern . A concern ranked #1 was given 30 points, #2 29 points, etc. If one merely placed X's by concerns, the X's were counted and the average point value assigned to each . For example, ifthere were three concerns X'd, each was given 29 points. Point values were added up for each concern, and all of the points for all concerns were totaled . Then the total points for each concern were calculated as the percentage of the total points. Comments received in response to summer 2001 survey. Development/Growth & Land Use!Looing *There should be a re-evaluation of the Growth Management Act--urban housing is becoming too dense, rural housing too sparse, and too much land is set aside for no development. (Lake Kathleen area) *Homes are built too close together--no room for runoff, privacy , natural buffers. Homes should be zoned to require more open space. A home should take up less than 1/3 of the property . (Maple Heights) *I'm concerned about the impact on my neighborhood and the Four Creeks area that will come from all of the development and new .land use that is currently talcing place, especially along 128th St. (O'Donnell precinct) *Development seems not to take into account our abilhy to handle the added traffic, resulting in unacceptable congestion . *The dense growth of high density housing on 128th and on 900 near Tibbetts. What a horrible way to grow! (Near 196th and 134th) *I despise the growth along 128th . I am a 12-1/2 year resident, near Maywood Middle School and am stricken with grief due to what they are doing to our woods . More buildings, more traffic . (14300 block of 165th Place) *No restriction . *This used to be a quiet place with quick, easy access to anywhere. Now it is a congestion nightmare, and hundreds of cars drive by at 60 mph on my 35 mph road . I see deer standing in a clearing (construction) and it breaks my heart. (148th Ave . S.E .) *Renton must be stopped! (Lake Kathleen area) *Development is allowed by government to outstrip the carrying capacity of roads & Legislature has failed to provide and specify major road construction. (12300 block of206th Place) *Growth: No . *I think that it is unfair that the density/growth in our Area is limited to only one side of 128th. There is a mini-subdivision grandfathered in on 176th Ave. S.E . and yet I can't build a small house on my land on 174th (over 1000 square feet) or subdivide. (12600 block of 174th Ave . S.E .) *I live on Tiger Mountain and I don't want to see it end up crowded like the Plateau. (Tiger Mountain) *Too much! Have lost our rural existence! (Briarwood South/Skyfire Ridge) *My biggest concern is the clear cutting for housing developments on I 28th S.E ., the change in density with incorporation, and the fear of even more land being incorporated by Renton. There is no plan for the huge increase in growth . (Valencia precinct) *Land use restrictions should be eased . I want higher density on Tiger Mountain, not a bunch of5-acre tracts for millionaires. (13100 block of250th Place) *Too much development. (Mirrormont) *The city limits are moving too far . (Briarwood) *My concern is for careless growth of Highlands area and accompanying issues of crime, traffic, and infrastructure in local community. (Briar Hill) *I'm concerned about losing the precious small rural character of the Issaquah-Hobart Road _ corridor to Mirrormont, road expansion, and traffic. (16200 block oflssaquah-Hobart Rd .) •seek to bring in solid services and businesses into our area. (13200 block of 180th Ave . S.E .) *Whether it is zoning, growth, parks or other areas on your list, rm concerned about the restrictions placed on home owners and/or how the rural lifestyle is being pushed out farther . (14500 block of Cedar Grove Rd.) *There should be growth management plans rather than growth stifling plans. (Mirronnont) *I see too much housing development and fear Renton will continue annexing land until we have another city, or Issaquah . (Maple Hills) *My wife and I moved here from Bellevue for some open space. We are in a 5-acre zoning area. Up the street, land is being cleared ... in order to build several houses. They have covered over wetlands according to our neighbor and we want to make sure they can rightfully construct all these houses. ( 150's blocks of S.E. 116th) Development/Growth & Land Use/Zoning (cont'd) • As I was born in Seattle, raised on Cougar Mountain, and have lived in my current house for over 8 years, located in the Briarwood area, east of Renton, I feel I have the right to voice my concerns about the way this area is being developed. My children attend Issaquah Schools, and for that I am grateful. It was a little chllling though when I took my children on a kindergarten bus ride and the organizers called out all the elementary schools im the district (The children raised their hands when their school was called.). I think I heard at least 20 schools called and I thought back to when I attended elementary school in Issaquah . I believe there were about 5. I feel so sad when I drive down Cemetery Road these days . Each week, it seems, there is a new clearing for a new development. Can't imagine what traffic will be like soon--especially when developers take a Jane for their own use, as I have seen in the past. I took my kids to Dairy Queen about a year ago (offDuvall and 128th) and my son started to cry as we were in the drive-through. I asked what was wrong and he said he missed the trees . That area is now home to those marvelous storage units, probably for all those new residents with crammed houses or apartments . I have deer running through my yard more lately--they have nowhere else to go. When and where is the cap? When is it enough? I understand that when my own house was being built--over 30 years ago--someone probably complained, if there was anyone around to complain. This place was pretty barren back then. Thanks for letting me ramble on about something so important to me and my family. P.S. Do developers pay a certain amount toward new schools? If not, they should! (Briarwood) Traffic/Congestion/Roads *S.R. 900 needs to be straightened and widened to accommodate the current traffic and future growth. This roadway is never addressed by the county or state-why not? (Hi-Valley) *Main roads need two lanes both ways, lanes added--Coal Creek Parkway. More thru roads. (146th Place S .E .) *Congestion is hampering economic growth. (18900 block ofS.E . 133rd Place) *If large areas are made into houses (as near Newport), another arterial should be part of the builder's responsibility, not just dumping cars on to small back roads . (14400 block of Renton-Issaquah Road) *Large developments should pay most costs to upgrade road system to handle their increase in traffic volume. *There is lots of development on S.E . 128th St. I'm concerned about it becoming congested, traffic-wise . ( 16400 block of S .E . 135th) *What effect will the new developments have! (13300 block of 191st Place) *We are a substitute for 405 . I'm appalled the Legislature cannot agree to a plan . (20500 block of S.E . 136th) *Issaquah-Hobart Road has become very congested (Widen it?). (Tiger Mountain) *Since we don't have any sidewalks or street lights, it seems dangerous to walk or bike ride on my road . It would be nice if one shoulder was paved and marked as a bike lane. (Tiger Mountain) *Keep Maple hills a "no outlet" neighborhood . Prevent a connector to Maple Valley . Thanks! (Maple Hills) *Build the new road to the new Sunset interchange in Issaquah immediately--traffic on Issaquah-Hobart Road is impossible. (13100 block of250th Place) *Because too much building going on. (Briarwood South/Skyfire Ridge) *Too much traffic and congestion. (Mirrorrnont) *Roads are good, no complaint. It's that they trimmed each side of road 128th, got to 196th and stopped. There's a curve after our driveway and so much brush on side of road, can't see the cars coming down, just to get in our driveway, whlch is on the left side. Wouldn't be too bad ifwe didn't have all the speeders on our road .. (13400 block of 196th Ave. S .E .) *Need more roads; wide roads. (Mirrorrnont) *Excess traffic #1 problem . I've stopped commuting to Seattle due to this and am considering relocation due to it. Increase in growth in this area without adequate road infrastructure is disturbing. (Off of Cedar Grove Road) *Road maintenance and roadside maintenance (cutting growth back from roads) and ditch maintenance. (Briarwood) *School traffic. (Briarwood, 175th Ave. S .E .) *Issaquah-Hobart Road inadequate for the amount of traffic. (I 5600 block of263rd) *Maintenance of roads and with all the building in surrounding areas. Can our small roads handle the volume? (20500 block of S .E . 136th St.) *Roads should be wider to handle all the people coming to live here . (Mirrormont) *900 from May Valley Road to 1-90 is backed up horribly during rush hours. It is going to get even worse with all the new development going on. Widening the road just south of Newport Way on 900 is a joke if they think that will alleviate the congestion when all 1,800 new homes in East Cougar Mountain are occupied! (Sunset Valley Farms) *The traffic congestion is a by-product of the housing development. Many of our roads are being congested past acceptable limits, especially with trucks. (Maple Hills) *Too much . Too many people using Issaquah as a "through way." Too many people living and working in Issaquah. Don't want any more construction, commercial or residential. (Mirrormont) *Our main concern is 128th. With all the new developments, it can turn into another 99. Accidents will get worse--people drive too fast and just too many damn cars. (13100 block, 158th Ave. S.E.) Environment *Thls environment is so fragile--! worry that cynicism and inattention will endanger it. (20500 block ofS.E . 136th) *Replace bridge just off Maple Valley Highway on 149th Ave. S.E . over Cedar River. Due over 3 years, needed over 30. (I4000's of 171st Ave. S .E .) *Loss of native habitat & environmental degradation. (Mirrormont) *Too many derelict cars and equipment setting around , spoiling the naturalness of the landscape. Clotheslines in front yards with clothing hanging from them . People don't take care of the upkeep of their property. Toonerville territory. (Coalfield-May Valley) *Keep more green spaces. (13100 block, 158th Ave. S.E .) *God said we could use this world , not kill it. (14600 block, 161st. Ave. S.E.) Taxes *Need to hold the line on increased taxes, avoid our elderly being taxed out of their homes. (13200 block of 180th Ave. S.E .) *Too high ; too much waste--e.g ., daycare pay subsidies. (Lake Kathleen area) *I find them very high compared to what I was paying in Bellevue. (16400 block of S .E . 135th) *Legislators have not used taxes wisely for 30 years in their failure to build roads. (12300 block of 206th Place) *Too high . Unincorporated, "rural"; I am being charged like urban. We pay too much. Why are we paying for the res t of these at the county level ? Should be state, except real local concerns, like crime. I just lost my husband and can't afford to live here because property taxes are exorbitant. I have been re-zoned due to Growth Management Act and my house sits on an 8-acre "lot." I will be re- buying my land every 4 years! (Above Hi-Valley) *Taxes will always be too high . (20500 block of S.E . 136th St.) • Always go up. ( 14600 block, 161 st. Ave. S.E .) *Consistently rising every year, services we receive don't seem to matter re what we're paying. (Lake Kathleen area) Building Regulations *Building permit process is too costly, takes too long. (18900 block of S.E. 133rd Place) *Lack of Crime *I picked crime as number 1 because we have been vandalized and stolen from 2 times and we've only lived in our house for le ss than 2 years . (12800 block 162nd Ave. S.E .) *So far, so good . (14000's of 171st Ave. S.E .) *Bad kids with irresponsible parents in Mirrormont. (Mirronnont) Education *The best education we can afford for the next generation. *Classroom size is too large (more teachers). (Tiger Mountain) *The Issaquah School District and diving into the humanistic approach of teaching, rather than sticking to teaching on the emphasis of academics. I prefer they focus on academics and making sure students learn what is right academically, rather than trying to build self- esteem, with any answer being approved as long as the student tried. (Maple Hills) Speeding, etc. *I picked speeding as number 2 because we live on the corner of 162nd S.E. and S.E . 128th but it feels like I live next to a raceway. (12800 block 162nd Ave. S.E .) *Speeding on Tiger Mountain Road. (25400's block ofS.E . 138th) *Speeding is terrible on 196th. Limit is 30 mph, few obey that. Goes on all day. Children will be going to school soon. My granddaughter has to walk on the side of the road, then cross to bus stop. Also, other kids in the neighborhood. I wait to collect my mail if cars are coming down the hill. (13400 block of 196th Ave. S .E .) *Speeding on rural streets mostly by high school students. *May Valley Road sometimes feels like a race track. (20500 block ofS.E. 136th St.) *Too many times kids race down our 25 mph street. (Licorice Fern) *More police presence on 128th, especially near "Issaquah-Lake McDonald" Y. Cars travelling at high speeds constantly ignore 35 mph limit at intersection. (Near Lake McDonald) *Going too fast on May Valley Road. Also concerned about stupid things such as smashing trash cans and just general stuff plus mail theft . (Hi-Valley) Endangered Species Act *Endangered Species--out ofbalance--too strict, too controlled . (146th Place S.E .) *Get the bridge in . (14000's of 171st Ave . S.E.) *Money spent to comply with ESA seems like, in large part , a big boondoggle. (Lake Kathleen area) Parks *With all the housing development going on along N.E. 4th/128th, I'm concerned about connecting green space parks . I want to be able to take my children on their bikes and safely move from my home to a designated point (like a library or park or grocery store. I hate having to rely on my car to safely get places with my family . (Briarwood) *I don't think we have any! (Tiger Mountain) *Not enough ball fields! I. (Briarwood South/Skyfire Ridge) Public Transit *I'm worried that bus service is getting worse. I have few options to driving if I miss the 111 bus or need midday or evening service. Park 'n' Ride lots for day-long routes are too full (I used to park on the street near the S. Bellevue Park 'n' Ride, can't now, it's restricted .). (13300 block of 191st Place) *We need public transit. (25400's block of S.E . 138th) * An area transit system is a must to reduce traffic problems--but it must be prompt and reach many places easily to be usab le. Europe has a great system . (Maple Hills) *No Metro on Issaquah-Hobart Road . *Tell your legislator to raise the gas tax to fund a mass transit system. It is the single most important issue we face now and will be in the future . Recreational facilities/programs *Availability advertised . Library *Great. (14600 block, 161st. Ave . S.E.) Law Enforcement *Police officers are never seen patrolling in my area . In the year I have lived here , I've seen 2 officers on May Valley Road . (20500 block of S.E. 136th St.) •r believe we need to continue to maintain a strong law enforcement presence in our neighborhoods . (13200 block of 180th Ave . S.E.) *Excellent. (14600 block, 161st. Ave . S.E.) Sewer/Septic *Lack of enforcement. On 116th, property was sold to build a horse arena?? They put a septic-tank in on a Saturday (no permit) and the house (not suitable for living) is now being occupied by multiple families . We (the neighbors) have formally complained to Health Department, Land Use, Water people . It is not anyone's job to stop this . 1 SOO's area of S.E. 116th) *No sewer-land use residential. (l 4000's of 171 st Ave. S.E .) *Need sensible advance of the sewer system . (13200 block of 180th Ave. S.E.) *Discrimination . Different septics for different people (Money) (14600 block, 161st. Ave . S.E.) Churches/Schools in RuraJ Area *Preventing churches is a disservice. (Maple Hills) •schools are always in need of$ and not enough churches in our area . (20500 block ofS.E. 136th St.) *Since there has been an increase in housing, it would be great if churches could purchase land, as well . (Maple Hills) Drugs/ Alcoholism . *This is everywhere . (20500 block of S.E. 136th) Government Services *Lack of enforcement. *My biggest concern is the lack of enforcement of safety codes . [A] neighbor has a trailer that they hauled onto the property and set up without permits from the County. They are running a power line from the back of the house to .. the trailer . I am concerned about the fire hazard ... My neighborhood is also zoned single family residential and the property in question already has a house on it and they are using the trailer as a rental ... rm also concerned about outdoor burning that takes place 9 months of the year. Why is the County allowing outdoor burning in a residential neighborhood? Why are my neighbors being permitted to smoke me out of my own yard? I can't even have the windows ofmy house open for 9 months of the year because of the burning ... [T]hey burn their household garbage everyday .. .It hardly seems fair that something this serious isn't brought up for a vote. I want my voice to be heard and I want to vote on the issue of outdoor burning in residential neighborhoods. The County needs to come up with alternatives to burning. The County should offer curb side pick-up of yard waste. If the City of Renton can offer this service to its citizens , then the County should do the same for us . (12000's area of 176th Ave . S.E.) *I am very concerned about zoning law enforcement in the unincorporated areas . (26300 block of S.E. 158th St.) Composting Company *Keep smell down . *Great. (14600 block, 161st. Ave . S.E.) Services for Elderly *I don't see any of these either, except in Issaquah. (Tiger Mountain) Other & Miscellaneous *There must be some way the gun club could build sound absorbing walls around the shooting range to reduce the volume. ( 18300 block of 145th) *Improve animal welfare. Too many people simply tie up their dog for long times, sometimes their whole lives . People should be educated about the cruelty of it. (Licorice Fem) *Trash along the roads is another concern . We pick it up all the times. (13100 block, 158th Ave . S.E.) *You all do a great job. (Above Hi-Valley) *Need to address the litter problem along I28th--organize neighborhood clean up days--pick up the litter, etc. (Lake Kathleen area) *Thanks for your community involvement to help our neighborhood . (Briarwood) *Over 50 years ago we had the technology to get rid of the internal combustion engine, but greed for money is always first . Everybody has hurry to the next red light. Get rid of the King County Council. (14600 block, 161st. Ave . S.E.) *This is a beautiful and, generally speaking, peaceful place to live. "Beautiful" goes without saying, but peaceful , yes, most of the time. What I mean is we don't have busy freeway overpasses crisscrossing over our homes and we don't live under a flight pattern. The kind of peace rm talking about is neighbor-to -neighbor. We've lived here almost 9 years in the Mirrormont area and have noticed that people don't mingle much with their neighbors . Maybe because of the way properties are: large lots made private by thick, tall tree growth, no sidewalks to invite people out for a stroll, numerous dark, dreary days that keep people inside their homes . Not enough common areas--neighborbood parks or fishing/swimming holes ... We would love to see the Mirrormont Park Project happen . Some residents expressed concern that "outsiders" would come swarming into our neighborhood park, invading our community with hoards of people and traffic jams full of cars, aimed at the park's parking lot. This just simply wouldn't happen--not here any more than it has happened to the Four Lakes community, with their lake, park, and gazebo . (We are for creating a park here.) Getting back to the peace-with-your-neighbor subject, I don't think people talk to each other enough (or ever). I have obderved that , if someone drives past another's property and sees a tree or two being cut down or a piece of heavy equipment changing the landscape, suddenly an anonymous letter shows up in their mailbox or a sign outside their land is spray-painted with an accusing graffitti . The person who wrote the nasty message never bothered to go to them and talk . Perhaps, if they made a neighborly visit over to the people, they would have found out that the two trees being removed were deceased or growing in a dangerous way that was threatening the structure of the home or such . Maybe the piece of heavy equipment was smoothing out an uneven, pitted area to make a level lawn or playing area that could be safe and more usable for a family with children . Or bow about a handicapped relative? We'd like to suggest that your board put together some kind of "outline of suggested ways to talk to your neighbor" form Send one to everyone . Perhaps it could have a few suggestions of how to talk to a neighbor regarding their dog that keeps you awake at night or whatever collection of disputes may exist between neighbors . Let's get neighbors talking not murmuring against each other. Maybe you could include the form in your next mailing or, at least, write up a few paragraphs encouraging neighbors to talk . (Mirrormont) Resident Survey Response to Proposed Rezone ancl Preliminary Plat of Evendell - L01 P0016 and L01 TY 401 Name Address 1}1-12 'Ren:l:.on , Phone Number Email Address ~ !1ioln Scobu " 158 live . 5 .(,. U.H 980W A I Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project . 2. l h.e en. v .ur.ol'IJ7leAf. ~ t,;e/f,'T!'lt.f!:!T:f. o( May we include this data in communications with King County? No No No Yes No 3 . :1note£U,i..ntj the nwnbe;r. vf.. hornet, woul.d pui:. a 1:,i.Nti.n. on a,ll. u;lili.;t.i.,e,6, .6 eltVW...6 , e.,t,peci.a/ /.ij. po.li.c.e , and .6ch.oo14 . C Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area , and where you have seen them . Especially important are nestin or other Ion -term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too . D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments . Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. !We have a J..ahe o( wai.P.A on i:h.e ea.of. ,1.i.de of. ou.Jt h.ome eveJUj :ti.me il IUU..f1,6, • Bef-o1r.e outt:JJu; in a .op e..cu.d dNu.n , owr. PJ1.i-i.Jre bacil. tuvrd became a 1-ake. ulien il l'lCLi.n.ed COfTlll1.9-JU-flhi:. up i:.o owr. doo1t, d.opped onl!f bf!, put:ti.nr; in. a .6ljPhon h.o.6e. If you need more room , please continue on the back of this sheet Even more paper is available. Just ask! l of Z ... .: .. : .. · ·:.; ........ : ,::· . . ' .. :;: .···· .:-· .. ... :~. .; .. .. . Address / 3 JI (,, / 5 F h--. ,/t I/? 5 & R ~n fo n , 0 fJ-q tt> :5 C, Phone Number 2-3 5 Email Address A I Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. 1 . 2 . 3 . May we include this data in communications with King County? No No B I Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neiahborhood will be damaged by this develooment. If you own Livestock animals. please list types and numbers Type C Number Type Number Tvoe Number - Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in U,is area, and where you have seen Ulem. Especially important are nestin or other Ion -term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. j)oSS\J"""-I C.oyoTc...:S I J...A<..o,,.-') I C:...0J5i<tf?...!> ) 1.,,,,.-l,T,e 'j/l..<l..p,-'° H-oA,,-.,e-1) 0 '-' L / OeG!t. 1 5 ~ v 1,tu: .. L.5 / /-/,4.._,I<. S W tU) J"lfH31J1,S. S"L"'~~..,o"'·,,5 1/ n " ,.,,_-~,,-.....,._ , H\J-.r•.,.J, ,::,11tO.> J{f' o 7""Tetj o v l... ,, /J_,q<.O t: A,~ D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! r o·f z_ r ' '·. ' ! .· .:: ,: ..... .-·: ... ,• .··:· .·.· .... ··:· .. ·: ·.· ·.· . :· .... • .. . ... ·· ~ame ~ddress J30rf/S !5R ~ {ft~, _.I.e. ~ / alt? t?c?o5r >hone Number :mail Address ~ J Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Ev~I project. May we include this data In communications with King County? No No No Yes No C Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nesf or other I -term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments . Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. f you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet Even more paper is available. Just ask! . · . . . ... :::: .... :• . ':· .· :-··.··:· . :·. . ·.• ·=·.·· . ....... . ., . : .. . .~ . . . · .. : . ' .. . : ', .. ~ ... !jji llM or ~ I l . i ~ / -;;· A;f.;o~ -.<../-!r,/L _./ //1 11t11~_,'{ I J t¢ G!"( /~><. Resident Survey Response to Proposed Rezone and Preliminary Plat of Evenclell - L01P0016 and L01TY401 Name Address Phone Number Email Address A Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. May we include this data in communications with King County? Yes No .,,,, ,,- Yes . No . . ../ No No 2 · t1Cl.~4 t ·~Li~ cf ):)4Li@ A/Y) )IVttt l.f-)( (/2,2//-U. w_,,,~ cc(JL0e,L(_ '-/ Y&)d _[A') (1,l_t.;2c J Y--0 .. bJ?:( !20' f4L)S,Y. ,,,- :.4--"'· -.,,Jt;. ~ I --:-... ~ t1-'2 frc.,,1-~· 3· vL ·?)L,fXtLf-n 1 tcz){/ LL}( ~ h t)-t'~<fi L,.~ {1_.,,t;L>M/UltliFiv 'Sul//>0 ic_ {1 J c-:IYi Q/)XV udJ)spi-c!) tt~ ~'W) ·I t ~ 'J C Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestin or other Ion -term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. h1 5 hiCCutfr twb/e ha 5 ec.w-sed 3 eptlL D4ci:_ ap.,, J\Je 1.9 htJr runoff {PL1Ubte sfr-faW> /n.bvtck'!_Javcl w/1<!. I} ,· J-van'")~. J1i·.uu~i:1 ,S r..,.nt.5 Ct v-e Q /.:Sc, 1 ~, .no. c/1 Ct wJ_ If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! lofl .··· •'. · .. : ... . · . . . . . ... ; ..... . .... . . .. . . .. . . : :;~ ·_).·:_·:· .·:;:_:.··.<· . . . . . . .. ~·.: : ... .. . . · .: . :· .. · .·· ........... . '••·· ..... . ..... . ~· .. Address / 5 // '/ / / _', J> AV -( 5;, /3"' P. er~;;,~ , w A· Y-?o .... ~-·9 Phone Number Email Address 0/ I A Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. 1. Ovl cf char(;}rc/t'r ho0c( w1fh May we include this data in communications with King County? No No No No 2 /f'fJljf c -t'-,ti°ln:J flt}m /~f lAAv-f · .1 E onk,- 11.f M (ch-. //ti' · .ofr9rw · -~,:r 9 ,'{ N., IM<ffe C /;',;le), '<-:r......, -JI j ,., 1-1 i't) ( 3 .. · ~ f~~"! o/e S -fd , C. • U/ OU /o/' //J .ff/ er (>/&re .f l-ffljf C l~ykl Nj/J. aj/er /h o/1.,:; 01 cJ-1-<-- / £;{; ~ ____ _... ---------- C Desaibe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestin or other Ion -term habitations and uses. Creatures i n ditches count too. S,~1/Bt 111f:/f. ~~(":._~-1 (lertJn s./ .f~-t{)./. i?/J Otvl l?-tf,fir;_!J, l30..f·.[1 (~6>t{.&'(JjrJ$1 ,':, yviN'-{!/~i Ve:}SSf/J,1/ff, ro;/ul-e..1 C?!t.:fJ.:..l.r-. FfY.:J . S Toc;d5. . · dtr/.en (na/c-ts· ~ -!'Gt f...5.· I .Jv 11v1ru 1~ b 1 ·fr . /J.i ku v ii)(- D Drai~ is another major issue in our argwnents. Describe any drainage related problems you have experience . "c~ ,1 , > I I V "f- !I// f?/1 \·I vur (-fr.)w/ ,-, / (,, (:/l_)M_ i i If you need more room, please continue on the back of this shee t Even more paper is available. Just a sk! I J~ .. Pu/ c-re --d .eul UAJo df .fr/::-.er,, 62 I.le, '/ s 1 ,ftva// (!.,'£ Rv lJins I lJ!t1e {' w~ ha£/.f J,;1'jc; 1 Ci'ows1 U!iiol dv,!f.s at r iOnv!) Zu!i/Mj-' /--/ et wk s I z {;j /1,( bb<f /.f!S , /h '~ sp 0h I ;/J~ 4 1 !s {/J ---/J('(J?f 1· / --:-, y l -.5 --Ii .f' /t~ . 11/~ s·.f'/ Fil {hJ7 rovc:;w .. J ..... . .. · . • ..... .. · . ·•: ··.· No Address /3-I I 8' 15 8' f5vi ·775r) 1 Lu/I No Phone Nootber L/d. 5 -7 I -7 SC/ ·7 -----~ -- Email Address •. ----ii Yes A Please describe )'(U top 3 oonoems d the effects ff the ~ Evendell project. 1 .. J1nf}t1C-f on . ·-ftle. rltra( C. a.sf} ere, Or OC/ r ne t'gii_hor hood. we_ ha11e larfe /o ·-fs ~a//d CJ...., C oufl-fr se.#1/Ja cl w1c:W1 -I?; />;,:eserve, If-. 2. ·Tia-f:f)c -()(Jr s ·free/-(lscfY /Joel" /JO Sld~wa/b a/Jd C--oalcl 110-f ha/Jc//e a/J J/JCre't?.J-e /n ·-fTtfrf?'c .. · 5:-f would be. v/lscrfc ·-lo/ Mr · /Je1 ·0/Jo/Aoocl CA1ld~~ - 3 . c/JV1/o/J/7J.e/J,-/zt I u11deve.lujJecl /o-/s fl o,ne_ -/o/ WI J d /; fe C!t>IJ_CU/75 #-u/e_ /j(?t/..{!_ /a/9e i tufl-?i -/rRes. ·-;-//a.·-f-;0rot//c/e c::<...., ,sue//. as ea les1 deerj e ·fc _ , .. C Desaibe the kinds d wildlife you haw seen in this a(ea, and where you have seen them. Especially importan se · or other erm habitations and uses. Creattns i\ <Itches too . . de.er a-I-~e 1211.d cJ -~ l5F 1h -f7te. o,,oet1 ·rie/d- coujar on -tAe C or11er D ·-f I 3 Z "" I sir racvon.s o,i 1sF/ D I Drainage is another major issue in our argl.lTI80ts. Oesaibe fJfff drainage related problems you have experienced (;)e.. Ql'e al/ Ori Sep-he .sljs-/cms t /Jere . We. C//.fL w o,ned -rilcrf--rile... buJ/d1/l7 o ·f )Jomes · moy 1/JCre'as~ ru.nof-f a11cl ('lL/1} 0{,{/ drd/11 -he'tds-- If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet Even more paper is available. Just askl I o.PZ. .: ...... ..... . • •' .. .... ·· . . ·:·_ ... I •• . . .. .... I ! :··· .·.: .· .. · .· : .. .··:· .:\ ... ,. •,• ..... · Name Address / 1-> l ;J J / JR 'cf/\ jk_ ~ 1 _ { _ f{ eut-hY, 1 UA!r q gos-ct Phone Number ~7 / - Email Address A Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. 1. 2 . 3. May we include this data in communications with King County? No No No Yes No C Desaibe the kinds of wildlife you have seen In this area, and where you have seen them. Especially Important are nesti or other I --term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches coun too. D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments . Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet Even more paper is available. Just ask! To : Distribution List Attached April 3, 2002 To : King County Surface Water and Land Management From : Michael Rae Cooke 13125 158th Ave . SE. Renton , WA 98059 Subj : Proposed Rezone and Preliminary Plat ofEvendall-L01P0016 and L01TY401 As a homeowner, we recognize that growth is inevitable. But we also know that there are current regulations, laws and statutes in place that impose requirements on applications of this type . The current application does NOT meet these requirements for the following reasons. Additiona1ly, we wish to prevent Joss of the character of an existing community, loss of habitat for wildlife, Joss of habitat for 1ivestock, loss of safety regarding exit routes during disasters, and protection from disease and crime that occurs when packing a dense number of people into a small area .. a. Urban Grid Pattern : It does not meet the urban grid pattern zoning requirements. b. Public Vote: Without a vote of the existing residents, the area was arbitrarily rezoned from Rl to R4 . When you look at a layout map this is very obvious . One developer has secured a rezone substantially inside the western border ofR4 to R8 . Now comes this other developer trying to add another R8, well into the center of the R4 area. If the later succeeds , the plan is to rezone again in the 5 acres adjacent to the Evendall plat. c. Character of the Neighborhood : It is not in the character of the existing neighborhood. The existing neighborhood is semi rural, not urban, inspite of what the county bas rezoned it to. Seven houses to the acre in an area that is composed of 1, 2, 5, l 0, and 20 acre plots with one house apiece is totally out of character with the existing neighborhood. In addition, regarding the quality of life, we thrive on the sounds of horses neighing, goats baying, cattle lowing, numerous bird and small animal sounds, space to breathe, safe areas to walk, rural beauty . We have precedent right to maintain our quality of life here , the animals we keep, and the forests and wildlife we protect . d. Traffic : Traffic Safety, tax increases, and maintenance has not been sufficiently managed or studied, at peak traffic periods as well as evening hours. By published statistics traffic averages 15,000 to 16,000 cars a day already on 156th Ave . SE, a two-lane road . This will add over 400 or so additional trips up a dead end street (158th Ave . SE .) per day . The impact on taxes, the county road maintenance, etc ., will be substantial. Tzying to get out onto SE 128th is almost impossible already . There has been one fatality, and many accidents, but the countyhas not addressed local residents' concerns and complaints to act on behalf of our safety. e. Fire and Earthquake: The present road structure is barely able to sustain OSHA requirements for escape routes. I) Houses as close together as Windsong on SE 128th present an incredible fire danger. If one goes, a whole row will go. At the very least heavy damage will be done to the houses on either side, fire trucks and aid cars wiJl not be able to get to them with the residents trying to get out.· 2) We have many natural gas Jines in the area. In the event of an earthquake, peple trying to escape will not be able to do so with the density of 75 new houses on 15 glh and possibly 20 more adjacent to it in the space of 5 acres . That's 85 houses crammed onto 17.5 acres. This is criminal when it comes to safety issues. e. Wildlife/Environmental lsssues: There are serious wils life and environmental issues that have not been addressed by King County Water and Land Managment offices, nor certified wildlife biologists. The current environmental checklists submitted byt the developers lists "unknown" no less that four times for threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Let me fill you in on what exists there, and in the area, in many cases nesting : 1) This is a list of the wildlife on my property: Weasels, Pileated Woodpecker (nesting), Squirrels (nesting), Raccoons, Opossum, Field Mice (nesting), Great Horned Owls, Red Tail Hawk, Snowy Owl, Doves, Cedar Waxwings, Blue Jays, Crows, Titmouse's, Kill Deer, Wren, Mallards, Sparrows. Ruby Finch, Roufess Twoce, Robin, Black Capped Chickadee, Hummingbirds (Ruby and one other (nesting). (2) Ninety percent of these are permanent residents. All of th ese reside and nest around me on nejghbors property adjacent to mine. In addition this seems to be a part of the flyway for Gulls and Canadian Geese as th ey do land on our wetlands and fields . Ruffled Grouse have been seen nesting by neighbors . (3) Carnivors: In addition cougar (multiple) have been sighted by neighbors one house down from me, around lhe next block, and up 160th for two years running , as their habitat is being dimini shed by R4 and R8 building. (4) Black Tailed Deer are resident on the Eve ndall plot. I have seen them (four or five of them) oft en feeding in the fields across the street on 160th Ave. SE. Behind me on 156th, I have seen them running across the road to eat in the fi elds around 142n<1 and 144th. (5) Bugs and Insects: Most ofus have large gardens, fruit trees, open spaces, and evergreen and maple treed lots which provide shelter to a variety of bugs, insects, and wildlife. Beetles of au kinds, hornets, mud wasps, bees of four or five varieties including the endangered native bee,, and the rare Bumble Bee nest here and are common here. Several varieti es of Dragonflies, Butterflies, and Moths nest here. All of these are present on my and my neighbor's properties. (6) Across the May valley a mile away , are bear on the property of my friends who live there . The character of the open fields and the surrounding trees and wetlands which provide homes for the wide variety of wildlife is currently protected by the character of the neighborhood as it is. It was especially protected as R l . It has been mitigated to R4 . Grading permits have not been applied for by th e developer as required. Th.is may be becau se they are likely to resuJt in an impact upon the existing condition of a sensitive area. · e. Livestock Issues: On my plot I maintain two Toggenburg Goats (the size of small ponies), two Indian runner ducks (nesting), 2 large dogs, and 1 cat. Next door to me are 38 chickens. South of me are a minimum of 12 horses. Within the space of 3 acres south are 5 cattle. North of me, next to the 38 chickens are numerous geese and ducks, and an occasional turkey. Behind me are large houses on several acres apiece with dogs and children. On 160 .. running from 132 ... Street south are multiple horses and cattle. Right across from the Evendall plat are Carrier pigeons. Adjacent the Evandall plat are multiple horses (south side) and Damas (east side). f . Drainage: In the last three years, the area has experienced escalating drainage impacts. which have caused :flooding and severely impacted the existing residents . (1). New Flood Issues: Since the building on SE 128 .. and surrounding area began in earnest three yean ago, we have been subjected to severe flooding every year, whereas in the 29 years I have owned this piece of property we never h~d a flooding problem before. (a) My barn bas been inundated for the last 3 years with several inches of water during heavy rains . Fortunately part of it is higher than the other, but even that got doused 2 years ago. (b) Under my house has been flooded for the last 3 years with large amounts of water during continued heavy rains and this is a health ha7.ard requiring sump pumps. (2) Creeks. A creek runs 7 months out of the year across the back pastures behind mine and the neighbors. We never had flood issues prior to the changes caused in the water table by the developers putting too many houses on land that previously would not perk. The old laws required perks 3 times a year. (3) Springs: There are multiple springs in the area. These have become creeks as the water table level has risen due to destruction of wide tracks of trees, which remove and utilize approximately 1,000 gallons of water a day . (4) Underground River: It is suspected ttiat there is an underground river here. 1 have dug down to air in the back of my property and there are parts of it that are forever green even in the hottest summer. (5) Ditches: The county has refused to clean out our ditches, which provide drainage, for th ey say "lack of funds ". (6) Two Swamp and Pond areas less than 1/8111 mile from the house (Coal Creek). (7) Perk requirements and drainage ponds: Perks of property entertained for building, originally had to be performed twice in the rainy season, and once in the dry in order to gel a perrnil Because this area contains several Class ll wetlands, these were usually denied. Apparently because of the new engineering for drainage ponds, this restriction has been lifted . HOWEVER fflE NEW DRAINAGE PONDS BA VE NOT PREVENTED FLOODING, but rather have increased it!! Additionally with the drainage ponds have come noxious weeds and hordes of mosquitoes. No one maintains the drainage ponds and they are eyesores and bUgbts on the neighborhoods in which they exist. Once SE 128111 was lovely to look at. Now we face rows of ugly drainage ponds. You have only to look at developments of three or seven years to see what a blight they become. We respectfully submit this letter and the attached summary response to the Proposed Evendell Rezone and Plat Permit Applications LOIP0016 and LOITY40lwhich point out existing conditions, laws and regulations, that support denial of these applications and applications like it Sincerely, Michael Rae Cooke Program Analyst and Resident 13125 158th Ave. SE. Renton, WA 98059 -- Resident Survey Response to Proposed Rezone ancl Preliminary Plat of Evcndell - L01P0016 and L01TY401 Name Address Phone Number Email Address May we include this data in communications with King County? No No No No A I Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. C Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them . Especially important are nestin or other Ion -term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count t .cJ~r / D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheel Even more paper i s available. Just ask! 0~ ~ \\u...) ~i.eo&e.J Ct µv.~-~ i ,~.S ~ fvt<-( /.11:Ia-e. he~ Y)> ("0i..,Q_ . d \ . May we include this data in communications with King Coun ? No No Phone Number t\o.5 -a?J6-No Email Address No A I Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. 1. e,{') u , ro{\rn~r\-to \ c\e;-\, \.\ c.-\-, on ~ ~ 'o, t°' -t j ()Qfl"03~ . if'Cre..A5e« 2 · ()Jere rOlCO i "% ot S::,\--cc,\ s ,"' + rQ ~ '\='; ~ f\ i ~ t rf\Ore.S i Q,r, ft\t_ ~~~qse d 3. o~ '1Gi-Urq\ beau~ loss C Describe the kinds of animals you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestin or other Ion -term habitations an uses. Creatures in ditch s count, too. Dee~ wocdp~'k..rl-hee ir1.f ,~\? ) tq c.oo '""> 1 s9,1..1;r-re , t::Y e) l"f\O l;Ra9:,\ rob\n5, ~if\Q.heS, 'olue-.f:\jS, Sno. es . free.. f"oa-s (3c,cl(y~rd it-Cield be.~,nd "s) Cf; e._·~ C D Drainage is another major issu e in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. If you need more room , please co ntinu e on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! May we include this data in communications with King County? Name l'YlAfl..S HA !'low r.J Gett (Yes) No Address 15~4 ll SE 13~ TJ~ P lAtf ReNToN, WA. 9eioS'1 @) No Phone Number L\2..S .1.,,. 02.4S ~ No Email Address V\'\<tc I li A9~r@. o. \:~'oi . C:..O""'-Q No A Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. B I Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neiahborhood is distinctlv rural. If vou own Livestock animals, olease list tvoes and numbers Type Number Tvoe Number T-voe Number C Describe the kinds of animals you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them . Especially important are nestin or other Ion -term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count, too. D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced . If you need more room, please continu e on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! n Resiclent Survey May we include this data In Resp onse to Proposed Rezone t111cl Prel1111ir1c1ry Plt1t of Evcncl(:11 -communications with King County? L01P0016 and L01TY401 Name °5 t'r-f !. $'i\~\\J S, \ t)"i:. ~ \ \\'t\ Y'v\ ~ No 1300~ \ S-~ r \t-'{\'$ . ~ '--""' Address C, No Phone Number "41. S' -).SS -11. be\ ~ No -I Email Address Yes No A Please desaibe your t'JJ) 3 ooncemi of~ ef!~s fJ' thE ::irc??':ti Evendel! project. C Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen In this area , and where you have seen them. Especially Important are nesti or other I -term habitations and uses. Creatures In ditches coun too. ~4.A(,\t~Y' p,y\\) ~'}le.~, \\,"..,J$:"~ l(}}\U) ?.\~,\!~S s,w ·s -$c~~'l..-Q.A.C..\l>O \J.S-f 0.4.:oV rr-5 - h\1.M \l) "> ().M~\J '> ~ ~e.5 . ::> ~lt\-m,\.vb.lti , ~Q,.1.\.-ill.-~ · #lf~IW'-\Vf '\>,I.L t>! 'LUOo ll p-1c.\'.'.'.~~. 1:Lv.~ ~~ ~' \,\)v~'-~ D Dra inage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced . \~~ ~ 4" &-~ "!,\.} ~ (. ~ \~ v,.; _ &w t)\N\... ~\ 'Bots Ml~ L-~fi:.. ~~j - t>~~\l\{_~ t s S low ~ 1Wt ... ~~1 <-0: W\\\ '1,~~£ ~t. ~~ c.t1 ~~\\L\1..Q_~ zl. ~simvi6 tv'°',~ w l\\ ~c... u.-H~I) o \.l ""'-t... l-Ar"o ~VrfE-oC\'l\.~ V ti.>(\,"'~ ~U \o~JC'i:..S -1°\\~s ~ ~h \\ ~v.µ- ~\.J~ ~(.. ~-<A L~'O ~ ~"'t ~ -\ I If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet Even more paper ls available. Just ask! Name Address /300 Phone Number Email Address A Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. May we include this data in communications with K;ng County? No No No Yes No 1 ___ AJo roe..5ft wu~ S <. -t..J~~ no+-~~-t ou..r-S ~e-f- +o be.CC>m.L..> /1 I<~ IS-te, ~ e:,, /(p() -. ~¢, Cu,cer,7J_-C/J, /~ j_ 5m'<--II 11-e ¥f dour') aNi ar,,·me::t../ S, IY2o<:>+-o-F our-;j'-r S av.e.., bl j s.e... ~, t.tr 11/ntJr.Ps oa..m D'+h-~ ei ~ 2 ~o e> /s -J v0 or L ,-for ~ I ss 4:. 6 kit"-5Ghoo ( 'b), S 1,--,·c..: -w ferY\Dl<k.d re.c..en+ I j 0<.nd. ""--.J~ hovUL Ctcl.di!-d <f Dok-0/-e_ 'c)?l-S.S roo~ f-X>rkbk-~ plu.~ l sin:)e-'+!tis ear,~ ~oo/s r e i d ' 1 .. C Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestin or other I -term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. tf you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! (I}wc ~ ~ ~c.r ah[£ JJCU4:_ /)'v\.r ~~ -tv 1 ,JI._, .s 1 ~ Afk, tv -L, '-"AJN-1.L ~ ~/HtO~ ~ ~ ~- Resident Survey Response to Proposed Rezone ancl Preliminary Plat of Evendell - L01P0016 and L01TY401 Name 11, ~ Address S.6 . • Phone Number Email Address A . Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. ~~ $--'\'k V\-et. ~~-(R)-l ~l CJ 2 · r.&~ _13 Octe -~~ ~b.c ~ro ~e.---t H~Y ti.f '<. lo . .r1 <€.r l o-ts ~Q. a\~e . ,~} . 3 . May we include this data in communications with King County? / Yes No J ves No No Yes No B I Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neiahborhood will be damaoed bv this development. If vou own livestock animals olease list tvoes and numbers Tvoe Number Tvoe Number Type Number - : C Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them . Especially important are 1 nestin or other Ion -te habitations and uses . Creatures in ditches count too . Q...t_OC) \" l, tf\ s~~,~~~ D I Drainage is another major issue in our arguments . Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced . If you need more room , please continue on the back of this sheel Even more paper is available. Just ask! Resiclent Survey Response to Proposed Rezone ancl Preliminary Plat of Evenclell - L01P0016 ancl L01TY401 Name Address ])AV r;: 811 DE"S PETR\E So. 2... 73 rd -Cr:_, \,L} I-\ Phone Number 2... S3-Cf 41.-::. -~ 6 ( Y ----- Email Address . -. ---- A I Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. May we include this data in communications with King County? No No Yes • :t:"" a""-d.e.vel op,i..<J ct. f>lc;..~ ~ -t-R-4 d..e"'s,-t-J , ?ou ~eet t<> '(t:..p Ea..'66 o+-EUE"f....JDEL'-~a.diac_e.11-t-fo Lq:H;::1<,·r t-llCr-M S~y-1no1..,, A-/c..tr~<EµA 'Ph. ) "' ... st:rot1,te. . .sa-Ct.,is J5';000 V\ e..x\.-slr•ut f'/a.-t ,v ,-,R..*-. , .., S(} -Ft ./tc;,t, • :r C..O '-< / J. Mc, K €. ~ C) -re ""'1 U ..,~ ) o, .... :f R -~ J j, "'-f ; t '-vu4 /&. be tJ,, e. "'-,) rui.t '1 {h; vi 1 -C-0 do -f.c r -t h--e ct ve ~ ., C D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any · ·nage related problems you have experienced. "·· If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet Even more paper is available. Just ask! Resident Survey Response to Proposed Rezone and Preliminary Plat of Evenclcll - L01P0016 ancl L01TY401 Name &dw I I . ii 1 Address \ 3 5 2. 1 -i 5 lo Re.V'l-t o n I W Ft Phone Number Email Address t\ ve . S · E:-· q~oSC, -l.o 702- A Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. C tt.ho ve.. Is~ u ecs n e lqhb oY hoo d . May we include this data in communications with t(jng County? No No No Yes No D Drainage is another major issue in our arguments . Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced . ~+ f re~e-¥\ , d u.e. o ou.~ D V\ t\e~ 4--o o.. etLu·~ ~ w oo e~r1enc.e se veve d v-a.in"-q e o.,,-e.V'os 10P1 frob le i'<'5 . Howeve-r, If you need more room. please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! -/ \I' w\ \J \·l~U I ~ y\+" I :t l i'fom ;Cl G lAaJ ~\\dee~ ~ ea.s(.,vy\ + s d-t v-ea.s~ed ~ ~ u..cJei--s me~·, C-aM Go ld~, V\~h \"e9o n 'j LH\tos '.u. {us -Sided towhees o..v-ied thrush ou se· t, n0he s ~e,s ~ , ~ t1 -~rl (U,J a.-d J~e1/\.+-IN ood !:'7 \"OW':> -Feed \V\ ~a.vd h estn .A · bdd dt ;Clld ees lad-eapped dt~~ees .1,b~ ilhTtt..Jed h~rn 1"'ib,·n:Js Ll..follS ~ h\Unw'Y\;l"libi'rd$ ~ bv-ea~Jed ~u.. t h~+c1es...--'.· , . . 13 b~s+. --~ ~ro ui .s-Vtu/10\l~ -t-W) ~h q,to..-.q cxA I ,."'tev-1iv rev. -'-Y\ '=>e c \ u..deA ra..v=t of 1a..v-d t'\eo.v-wo s Ill 1\ .. \ \, , 'b ' \I , I \ • ' or~,~~Us ·wel_\.lOWS-P'e-si-1V\4 1\1'\ OlA.-"'t LU d1nqs ,hu..1,ttlV\~ IV\ ) ~ \ s -Ne.s i, "°I i ~ wood<;, N \\l ot o c.t,V-r> ro~-r"tl.( o.,v,A S E o4 o u.v "fro peit ~, 1 ctw k,,, . ~ u.V\-\-, ·"'! ouer \,\f o o As =.A "' f e.v, -11, 'elcls \l-" .:I o ~ c a.s ;o ""-ll '1 i" { ,-ees w ._ -1J. 1 • "'l 5mct-\l erbirJs -!'eed\<\~ lV\ ou.~-~lU--d, ; e,\ · s hct .f+ed ..(' I 1 ~ L,,v-5 a,-\-b , ;.,Hee J ev-; ~ ~ a.vd )ouh:'\ woodf e~e,--, >,-li11.,b/ wooJ~w . '" a,) J"-'-...._..\-woad.J bf ~o b;n s . ne.s -+ .·"" ~axcl cu-d 5U-V"ro t.A,v,.c.f 1vi1 wo o ds 7k_\r I ,r1 q S ~ ~eJ ! V\ 9 l'"ct.SS O'Y\ b lJ-'f ~ ~J Cf V-£-1-hs :ti i'~om ;ct O tAnJ :~\cteev ~ ea_so..,Y\ ts eJ-J1 v-ea.s~ed ~!:> u..c..-ker"o <\'\ev-·,c.D.M Gold ~(V)e,h r-e4on junc.os '.u. tus-s1Jecl towhees {l,V"i t d th nJ. 5 h OU Se "h ne,he s row':> hesl-nd·h.tc.ked di1co..dee5 lad-eapped Jiic~ees :l,~~ -Jf11w_ fed httl'l\ ff\ I~ b i'rd s l'le.s i i"' 'i c1.,rl a.,<,J a..d j Cl-l\e~\.-\--w oo d e> Feed 1V\ ~a.v-d 1.dou..5 ~ h..u'l'>W1;.-.1birds ~ bv-ea,,,\-ed nu.._t hoJc.~es~-, _ . ( 3 b'/f..St, 'f,'li'ro.vs-va.v1ou5, -_ \-11) Ji~h o,\.0 "9 ooc\ I, Y1tev-wren -<Y\_ <::>ecL.1..decl pa.,v-i of ~av-d fleav-IA.I ~ "' 11 ,\ \, , 'b' I'' I I• ' or~,~~ld5 wCLt\OWS-~esi-1V\4 IV\ 01,1..i (,U d1n9s ,h<1c1Atl"9 !Vl )1.1.\\s -Nesii4 il'"'I woods NW ot o<Lv-\='!'O:rrtl-j °""'~ S 6: o4 ou1-yropeif~, ~<lwks-\-\u_V\*l'w-i ~\Jev-usood,s ~A eire11 -R·e~s a.nd O c.ca.s(ol'at..l\'i ;,., -\v-ee.s W<L--kti,4 5ml{..\ler birds --feed\(\~ ti'\ o,u-~lL,--d, \ej -shu.ffed fl1~le,v-] aJ b,~--c\ ~eeJe,-;,_ ~q_vcl ) 6 w 1\ "\ wood f ec...-ker __) )i'I ii "-kJ IP oocl-pe-Jc.e-v -; "' a) j«-c.e,,,_--t wocde<-i bf ~ob;,')$. ne.s-t ;" _ ~a.v-d ,a,"'d :!<1,t,vv-0,'-""d•vi'/ woods 2hv-L,1qs -~eJ in '\1'"4.Ss o~, bU--qsa-..J 'fvscbs ResiclenfSurvey · - Response to Proposed Rezone and Preliminary Plat of Evendell - .k01PQ01§ <1119 L,Q1TY401 Name C ,C.. ·, ' May we include this data in communications with King County? Yes No No No Email Address d -Yes A I Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. B I Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neiahborhood will be damaaed bv this development. If vou own Livestock animals please list types and numbers Tvoe -v .. Number Type Number Tvoe Number -;t./,,....... .I. • A 1 , _ 2 .• ·Ju,._. A,,~• - . C Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestin or other Ion --term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet Even more paper is available. Just ask! J~ ,.:Y!<'_P<J'Q,tj_ ckvekp. ''®d a~ ~l--~ 4t ,cµ; ev .~-Jxil: ,a,~. May we include this data in communications with King Countv? Name //?t, c:h ,1 ,, . d "<-:. /4,ye ,,;;;;~ -) No I ffYf(' (lc/C.~ ---.,r- Address /2 t' "'Y / / . ,,;;, e: (i;J No -···- Phone Number yz..,;-~ )_ 7 / ·-670) (~)' No --··' Email Address (Yes \ No ' / A I Please describe your ~op 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed _Evendell project 5 ,;-, /7 /(,,;J p?c, ?p7/:f' -µ~0 Y< 7/<' (,f' ,,,,_,,, < --.L <At -e. /,,P/?' o 1. / Jo.:// ~-·,/,,,d - 2. --r-:.-:r .x: e:-:3' -/,,, ,;f' 7 -~- 3. L/,tc_ ~,:? (/ ;V 7/'f/ /rt,' 1-1 f' - 1B j Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neiahborhood is distinctl • rural. If, ou own Livestock animals. olease list tv=s and numbers Type Number Type Number Tvoe Number C I Describe the kinds of animals you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestinQ or other lonQ-term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. _ D j Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet Even more paper is available. Just ask! Name Address Phone Number Email Address j 30(2 /Sts11i ,4-Vt <{,E-- ~e,'rt-Yn I l'\llt q'B03'} May we include this data in communications with King County? No No No No A Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. C I Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestinA or other lonQ-term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. D I Drainage is another major is~ue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. ~' C( t:th/~ .. \~ ,.....,.1, C,_ , -. J'••' ~ ,_ ,·· _ ,--· /' t C:: -~ ~ • . \· (7--\ rrv-.C\ .c,,-0 ' ,. , ····· _.,_ -.. '? o 6 .. .c·.e.., {\t) -\:. ,._e, \~\u_.,..~,. . .\ri;: '" c ( r ... _·-. ,.! r~ \ c .. \~ ·.·.,·. ·. · ·· ~-' · ...) '\.,1, IJ.,,,.,,..,,~;.. cl': •1\t'.'1...,.,. 1··c. (:, • .,. \.i'· ,,...,,·tt~,,rV'\,·\(t_\\. ,~\ .. :-\(: ... "':.·_ .:".r;~·-.,.·_t_.,. -\' V'-'" ,•· "'-~ . . . .. , _ y ,. -, -.. , .. , •• ~ .. ,._ I " If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! -Resicfe,1tSt1ivey . . . . . . Response to Proposed Rezone and Preliminary Plat of Evendell - ~01PQQ1G ~qcl k91TY4Q1 Name/~~-~- Phone Number Email Address A Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project. May we include this data in communications with King County? No No No es No i C J Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are i nestina or other Iona-term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count. too. I ID) I Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! Address\1-~IL\ 1._')'zStrA\{e.. s~ \\-.-e0-\ ,, ~, VI A C\ 'l O ':tl Phone Number Email Address May we include this data in communications with King County? No No Yes Yes A Please describe your top 3 concerns of the effects of the proposed Evendell project/ / .. \ / B 1 Livestock population totals in our neighborhood may be a key indicator in our statement that the character of our neiahborhood will be damaaed bv this develooment. If vou own Livestock animals. olease list tvnos and numbers Tvru, Number Tv= Number T= Number - C Describe the kinds of wildlife you have seen in this area, and where you have seen them. Especially important are nestin or other Ion -term habitations and uses. Creatures in ditches count too. 'f'\.:,..\'1"\<:.s ,~c,,.c.\-.oo"5S::..'t>i\<:,,1;>t.'>'Ji/\.=:>:~0.\, t'c>\"'--<: >"'-'')'; 1 wood \'~\c.e,c,So\>1V\S G..'C\h ':.e·'lt.\c,\t s~-ece5 c~ \/V,\b ~,5,(!,;1 "''''"""'\s ,xccel'-\s ""'b C:-,"'-~\-..i'\)i'-'"$· 0 Drainage is another major issue in our arguments. Describe any drainage related problems you have experienced. If you need more room, please continue on the back of this sheet. Even more paper is available. Just ask! What is wrong with this picture? f===!ir---High density zoning is 1\101 consistent with the character of our neighborhood, We are the buffer between high density of the City of Renton and the rural zone of Unicorporated King County in accordance with the King County Comprehensive Pian. We demand the protection of our neighborhood as guaranteed by law. ~BllDxeous &oonmuuce lieu m OO.esjp>ouus6~0e ~~eoua!leDD Highlands_Neighbors@hotmail.com • King Coun1y 0epartmen1 of Qe,. I , • • et tt and ErnirorlT Lar,;l Use s..w:es !lMsiof, ' 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Aen1on. \IVA98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 PLAT DENSITY~ DIMENSION CALCUL.AlilJ.!I' Lo 1 Po o 16 -------~~~~==-~---~----------- n PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION WORKSHEET RELATING TO DENSITY AND DIMENSIONS A great many ordinaoc~ play .,:ii role in the creap of a subdMSion '#hhln King County. Determining the alk:iiwable denMy. maawnum density. minimum density, ana'lot widtt'I on a piece of property can be confusing. This wor1'$heet 'Will assist you in cOffectty appiving sp,ecificopttiom of the code and '#tU be used to detennine if a proposed plat or short plat ~ the density and ~ pr~ of the King County Zoning Code (Tine 21 A). This woritsheet is prepared to assiSt applk.ants, and does not replace cotnpbnce wtth adopted kxal. stale and federal laws. Preal)pication confe-rences are recommended. These confefences he4p to clarify issues and answet' questions. They may save you both time and mooey by etiminating dclays resulting from requests fof additional infonnation and rNisions. Yoo may call (206) 296-0640 to find out how to am,nge lo< a p,eappl;caoon conle<ence 1 • \ / (1' • (p DATE 25::HiH:='12 \jV I '\.: NAME OF PLAT: EYENDELL FILE NO.: LDIPQD16 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Urban c:esitjentiaULJ 2 Units per Aqe ZONING: R-6 IProvosedJ w/rla.z.~ COMMUNrTY OR SUBAREA PLAN: If mc>fe than one Cofnpt"eheosi\,oe Plan Land Use~ or zone classification exists tor the property. show the boundary between the land uses or zones and the area 'Mthin each on the pretimtnaJY plat map. If a single lot is dMded by a zone boundary. ba..sle.1i.tg den5Jty across zones on that lot may be pennitted sut,;ect to the prcwisions of KCC 21A.~2200. I. Site Area (KC C 21A Ofi 11721· / J Site area (in square feet) is the gross horizonla( area of the Pfoiect site, m ~ lands as defined by K.C.C. 2 IA.06.1265, and m_areas 'Nhd, are requifed to be dedicated on the perimeter of a project site fOf pubtic rihgts-of-wav. ____ o~---square feet in submerged land (any land below-the Ofdinary high water martc. -see K.C.C. 21A.06.825.) + ___ 24_·~""-'---square feet in perimeter rights-of-wav 'Nhich will be required to be dedicated Calculation: 11. 24,807 Total (area 30 feet from center line of road) fi66239 Gross horizontal area of the ptOted site 24.807 Total submerged lands and rights-of-way 541 ,432 Site area in square feet NOTE: To continue calculations. cotwert site area in square feet to acres by dMding by 43.560 ---'~2_.43_ Site area In acres Base Donsity (K.C.C. 21A.12.D30 -.040 tab!,,s)c The base densi1y is determined by the zone designation(s) ft>< the lot. 25-Ma,-02 Page 1 ot4 6 du/acre ~ ~ s,., °'Cl Q: "" I/ c, n:":-f g;.'/ ,-...l I· I ()''I/ ( • < • ( l 1 ·-"-...:: ! 1-.; ! ' J () PLAT-DENSITY AND DIMENSION CALC 'TIONS .. Ill.,' AounmnZ Q< cc 21A 12 ozm· 'The base number ot ~ unks is calculaled by multiptying the site area by the base density in ~ng units per acre (from K.C.C. 21A.12.030-.040~). 12.43 site area in acres (see Section I.) X 6 base density (see Section II.) = 7 4.58 allowable dweUing units When calculations result in a fraction, the traction is rounded to the nearest whole number as follow5: 1 . Fractions of .50 or aboYe shall be rounded up; and 2. Fractions bek>w .50 sh.Ml be rounded down. IV. Beouiced Po-stte BeaN1ioo 5oaa: (KC C 21A 14 180)· This section must be completed onty if the proposal is a residential dew:Jopment of mofe than four dwetling units in the UR aod A zones. stand-alone townhouses in the NB zone on property designated CommeJcial Outskle of Center if more than four units. or any mO(ed use de-clopment if more than four units. Recreation space must be computed by multipfying the recreation space requirement per unit type by the proposed numbef of such dwe41ing units (K.C.C. 21 A.14. 180). NOTE: King County has the discretion to accept a fee in lieu of all or a portion of the required recreation space per K.C.C. 21A.14.185. Apartments and townhouses devekiped at a density greater than etght untts per acre. and mtxed use must prOYide recreational space as lolHJONS: 90 square feet X _____ proposed number ot studk> and one bedroom uni _____________ ~o 130 square feet X 170 square feet X -----proposed number of two bedroom units O -----pmposed number of three or more bedroom un~·-------------~O -----Recreation Space Requirement O Aesidef'ltial ~ and t=houses deYetoped at a density of e,;ght units or less per acre must prCMde recreational space as tCJllot.Ns: 390 square feet X ----~7.c..O proposed number of units 27300 Mobi~ home parks shall prCMde recreational space as to46ows: 260 square feet X -----proposed number of units V. Net Aoildatte Acea (K.C C 21A06 79D· This section is used tor computing minimum density and must be competed ooly if the site is localed in the R-C through R-48 zones and designated Urban by the King County Comprehens.ive Plan. The net buildable area is the site area (see Section I.) less the to4kM1ng areas: ----~O;.... ___ areas ~a protect site which are required to be dedicated for public rights.of-way in excess of sixty feet (60") of width + ___ ~7~6~.1~30~---sensitive areas and their buffers. to the extent theV are required by King County to remain u-+ ___ 40_._2_S6 ____ areas required for above ground slonnwatef contro4 lacilibe$ including, but not limited to. retention/detention ponds. bkifittration swales and setbacks from such ponds and swales + ___ ~1~3~.650=:_ __ areas required by King County to be dedicated or resef'Yed as oo-sile recreation areas. Deduct area wtthin stonnwalef control facility if requesting recreation space credit as allowed by KCC 21A.14.180. (see Section IV.) + _____ o ____ regional utility corridors. and + ___ ~o ____ other aJeas, exdudiog setbacks. required by King County to remain u- Cak:ulation-, __ 1~30~.036=~-Total reductions 25-Mor-02 Poge 2 014 541.451 site area in square feet (see Sectiof'I I.) 130,036 Total reductions 411.415 net buildable area in square feet NOTE: convert site area in square feet to acres by dMding by 43,560 9.44 net buildable area in acres 0 PLAT DENSITY AND DIMENSION CAL \TIONS .. VI.~ r::, -n IJrt>an Res.Jdu~ .. -nsay lk CC 21A 12 060) The minimum density requtrement ~ QfW to the R-4 through R-48 zones. Minimum density is determined by multiptying the base density in ~ing units pe< acre (see Section IL) by the net buildable area of the site in acres (see Section V.) and then multiplying the resulting product by the minimum density percentage from the K.C.C. 21 A.12.030 table. The minimum density requirements may be phased Of waived by King County in certain cases. See K.C.C. 21A.12.060. Calculation' ____ Sc._base density in du/ac (see Section II. 9.44 net buildab&e Mea in acres (see Section V.) VII. ------,56,:'c.6c,7c X minimum def'l5itv % set forth in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 Of as adjusted In Section VII. _______ 48_. 1_7_minimum dwe41ing units required Minimum Oeositt Aruustroeot:; fnc Hodeete: 5'ooes CK CC 21A 12 087) Reskiential devek>pments in the R-4. R-6 and R-8 zones may modify the minimum density factOf in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 based on the weighted average slope of the net buiidable area of the site (see Section V.). To determine the 'Netghted average slope, a topographic survey ts requtred to cakulate the net buildah'e area(s) within each of the follmr.ing slope increments and then multiplying the number of square feet in each slope increment by the med~ slope value of each slope increment as loHows: 'O sq. ft O • 5% sk,pe increment X 2.5% median slope value +--------0'-sl'.1 II 5 -1 O'Y. slope incremen1X 7.5~0 medie.n slopevo.tue + 0 sq. 1t 10-15~• slope inaementXl2.5% medie.n slopevt1iue + O sq. 11 15 -20% slope maemen1X 1 i.5~• med1mi slope value + 0 sq 11 20 • 25% slope mcrementX 22.5% med1e.n slope volue + 0 sq II 25 • 30% slope 1naemen1X 27 5% medio.n slope volue + 0 sq. 11 30· 35% slope 1naemen1X 32.5~; medien slope vaJue + 0 sq II 35· 40% slope maementX 37 5% med1mi slope value ________ Dc._Total square feet in net buikiab6e area _____ __,0 0 Total square feet adjusted f()f s.k>pe Cak::ulation: ____ De.total square feet adjusted fOJ sklpe drvided by O total square feet in net buildabk! area _________ \llt'etQhted ~ slope of net bui6dab6e area _________ % (Note: muttiply by 100 to conYeft to percent. round up to nearest whole percent) Use the table bek>w to detennine the minimum density factOf. This density is substituted fOJ the minimum density factOJ in K.C.C. 21 A.12.030 tab'e when cak:ulating the mtnimum density as 5tlown in Sectioo VI. of this woritsheet. W8'ghted Avierage Slope of Net Minimum Dern.;ty Factor: BuMdab4e Area(sl of Site: 0% • less than 5% 85.00% 5% • less than 15% 83%, less 1.5% fOJ each 1 % of in excess of 5% 15% -less than 40% 66%, less 2.0% IOJ each 1 % of in excess of 15% EXAMPLE CALCULATION FOR MINIMUM DENSITY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MODERATE SLOPES, ------,==sq. ft O. 5% sk>pe increment X 2.5% median slope value + 10000 sq n S • 10% slope 1naemerrtX 7_5~0 median slope value + 20000 sq n 1 O • 15% slope inaementX 12.5% median slope value + sq. n 15· 20!,; slope inaemerrtX 17.5% medien slope value + sq. n 20 -25~0 slope ,ncrementX 22.5% medien slopevaJue + sq II 25· 30~0 slope incrementX 27.5% medien slope value + sq. n 30-35% slope increment:,..: 32.5% med1en slope volue + sq n 35· 40% slope incremen1X 37.5% med,e.n slope value ______ 30_0_0_0_Total square feet in net buikSabk! area Cakulation: ----~=~_Total square feet adjusted f()f slope --~==-total squa,e feet adjusted for slope divided by total square feet in net buik:Sable area ------~O~. 1_1 wetgl1led average sk>pe of net btJildabk!, a.-ea --------'1~1-'%'-% (Note: multipty by 100 to Corwet1 to percent . round up to nearest vmole percent) Using the table aboYe. an 11 % weighted average slope of net bu.idab6e area falb 'Nilhin the 5% -less than 15% range 'Nhich has a minimum density factor of 83%. less 1.5% for each 1 % of average slope in excess of 5%. Since 11 % is 6% aboYe 5%. mukiply 6 times 1.5 which wouk:t equal 9%. Subtract 9% from 83% fOJ an adjusted minimum density factOJ of 74%. This repiaces the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21 A.12.030 tab6e. 2S..Mar-02 Page 3 of 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 2500 • PLAT DENSITY AND DIYENSION • ,, •TIONS .. VIII. Maximum P r· al Units A"t:P:Med [KC C 21A 12 030 Q40)· This section shoukt be completed only it the proposal includes applk:atkln of fesidenlial density incl!'l'1tiYes (K.C.C. 21A.34) or transfer of density credit (K.C.C. 21 A.36 Of 21A.55). Maximum density is calcutded by adding the bonus or transfer units authorized to the base unib cak:ulaled in Section Ill. of this 'Mrl.sheet. The maximum density pennitted through residential density incenti'.e.s is 150 percent of the base density (see Section It.) of the underlying zoning of the dE"..elopmeut or 200 percent of the base density for p,opclS&S wtth 100 percent affordabM! unrts. The maximum density permitted through transfer of density credit is 150 percent of the base density (see Section II.) of the underlying zoning of the de-I. clcp:1.e, ,t. ____ O~base density in dwel~ng units per acre (see Section II.) X 150% 0 maximum density ____ oc.. maximum density in ct.Nelling units per acre X 12.43 site area in acre:!--------------"-0 maximum ct-Ne+ling units allowed utilizing density incentives (K.C.C. 21A.34) ____ O~base density in ~ing units per acre (see Section II.) X 200% 0 maximum density ____ o_ maximum density in ct-Netling units per acre X 12.43 site area in acre:! ______________ o maximum dwelling units aUowed utilizing density incentiYes with 100% atfoniab6e units (K.C.C. 21A.34) ____ O~ base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section 11.) X 150% 0 maximum density ---~O~ maximum density in dwelling units per acre X 12.43 site area in acre:!--------------"-0 maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density transler.i (K.C.C. 21A.36 Of 21 A.55) Cakulation: ________ O_base al~ dwetling units cakulated in Section 111. + 0 bonus units authorized by K.C.C. 21 A.34 + --------,00 transler units authorized by K.C.C. 21A.36 or 21 A.55 ________ o_total dwelting unib (cannot exceed maximums cak:ulated aboYe) IX. Minimum Lot Area For Construction: Except as prow:jed tor nonconformances in KCC 21A.32· A. B. In the UR and R zone5 no construction shall be petmltted on a lot that contains an area of le5s than 2.500 square feet or that does not com~ with the appticatMe minimum lot width. except for tCMTlhouse de'welop:1.etlts or zero-k:il~ine subdM5klns; and In the A. F, or RA zones: 1. Construction shall not be permitted on a lot containing less than 5,000 square feet: and 2. Construction ~I be limited to one dwetling unit and residential accessory uses for lots containing greater than 5,000 square feet, but less than 12.500 square feet. (KCC 21 A.12.100) X. lpt Wtdth· 25-Mar-02 Page 4 of 4 Lot widths shall be measured by scaling a circle of the applicab6e d~ within the boundaries of the lot as shown bekJw. prOYided that an access easement shall not be included 'Nithin the circle. (See KCC 21 A.12.050). ·' King Coun1y Depprtment of De-I , , .a ,t and Erwironm PLAT DENSITY AN .. Land Use 5eMa,s DMsa, DIMENSION CALCULAi'llllir" • 900 Q;J,escfa'e AYern.Je SW Renb,. WA 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 PRELIMINARY SUBOIV1Sl0N WORKSHEET RELATING TO DENSrTY AND DIMENSIONS A great many ordinances play a role in the creation of a subdMsion within King County. Delermining the aDowable density. maaimum density, minimum density, and lot wdh on a piece of property can be confusing. Thb 'lJIIICrt5heet will assist you in con-ectty apptying specific portions of the code and wUI be used to determine if a proposed plat or shoo: plat meets the density and dimension$ provisions of the King County Zoning Code (Title 2~A). This worksheet is prepared to assist applicants. and does not replace comp6.ance wtth adopted kx:al. state and fedefal laws. Preappltc.alion conferences are recom11.e-..ded. These confefences hetp to clarify is.s.ues and al'lSWef questions. They may save you both time and money by etiminating delays resulting from requests for additional information and rMSions. You may call (206) 29&6640 to find out hcNri to arrange fOf a preapplk:ation conference. DATE: NAME OF PLAT: EVENPFI L FILE NO.: L01PD016 If more than one ComJXehensiYe P\an Land Use designation or zone classification exists for the property. show the boundary i:>et'Neen the I.and uses or zones and the area vtithin each on the preliminary plat map. H a single lot is dMded by a zone boundary. transferring demJty across zones on that lot may be petmitled s.ubject lo the prOYi:skins of KCC 21A.12.200. Plea;w complete only the appf;,;;ah&P portions of the toan I. Site Area fK CC 21A 06 1172)· Sfte area (in square feet) is the gross horizontal area of the protect Sfl:e, ~ submerged lands as defined by K.C.C. 2 IA.06.1265. and m_areas which are required to be dedicated on the perimeter of a protect site for public rihgts-of-way. ___ ....::O ___ square feet in submerged land (any land beklw the ordinary htgh water marl( -see K.C.C. 21 A.06.825.) + -----"o ___ square feet in perimeter rights-of-way which will be required to be dedkated (area 30 feet from center line of road) ___ _::o ___ Total Calculation: II. 496,355 Gr055 horizontal area of the project site ____ o_Total submerged lands and rights-of-way 496,355 Site .-ea in square feet NOTE: To continue calculations. convert site area In square feet to acres by dMding by 43.560 ___ 1_1 _.39_ Site area in acres Base Density (K.C.C. 21A.12.030 .. 040 tables): The base density is determined by the zone designation(s) for the lot. ___ _:::4 ___ dulacre /7 ! ' lOJpo 01a ., / ,_' ~ i'.,t I ·,r, ' , .... 1 () Exhibit No. _1--'~'----- 25-Mar-02 Page 1 of4 ltem No.t'..C/PQQ//o t LOJTt{l/0) Roceived 3 • 1£> -O.'.\ PLAT DENSITY AND DIYENSK>N CAL' \TIONS .. Aouod:02 (KC C 21A 12 070)· lhe base number of dvi,e,lling units ts cak:ulaled by muhiptying the site area by the base density in dv..telllng units per acre (from K.C.C. 21A.12.030 • .04.0 tah'es). --~'~'~·39::::.. site area in acres (see Section I.) X 4 base -(see Section II.) = 45.58 alkM-ab&e dweling units When cak:ulations resutt in a fraction. the fraction is rounded to the nearest whole number as follovrr.i: 1. Fractk>ns of .50 Of aboYe shall be rounded up: and 2. Fractions bek,w .50 shall be rounded dc:win. IV. BemYred Oo-:site Beo:eatioo 5racr (KC C 21A 14 180)· This section must be comP'eted onty if the prc:,pos.M is a r~ de' elopment of more than lour dweWng units in the UR and R zones, stand-ak>ne townhouses in the NB zone on property designaled Commercial Outside of Center if more than four units, Of any mixed use dee eloµneut if more than four units. Recreation space must be computed by multiplying the recreation space requirement per unit type by the pn:,pos.ed number of such dvteffing units {K.C.C. 21 A.14. 180). NOTE: King County has the discretion to accept a tee in lieu of all Of a portion of the required recreation spact' per K.C.C. 21A.14.185. Apartments and townhouses deYek>ped at a density grea&ef than etght units per acre, and mixed use must prc:,,,,;de recreational space as foUows: 90 square feet X 1 JO square feet X 1 70 square feet X ______ proposed number of studio and one bedroom uni. _____________ -=..o ______ proposed number of t'NO bedroom units 0 ______ proposed number of three Of more bedroom un~·--------------"-0 ______ AeCfeation Space Requtrement 0 Residential subdMsions and townhouses deYek>ped at a density of etght units Of less per acre must prOVKie recreational space as foUows: 390 square feet X ----~46::,_proposed number of units 17940 Mobik! home pario.s shall pr~ recreational space as foUows: 260 square feet X ______ proposed number of units V. Met Btwrtatte Area (KC C 21A 06 79D· Thjs section is used fOf computing minimum density and must be comP'eted only if the site is located in the R...i through R-48 ~ones and designated Urban by the King County ComprehenSNe Plan. The net buildable area is the site area (see Sectk>n I.) less the lolk:iw'ing areas: + + + + + ----~O ____ areas d)m.a P'oied site \M"IK:h are required to be dedicated fOf public rights-Ot-way in excess of sbcty feet (60j of width 65.700 ---=~~---sensitive areas and their ~. to the extent they are required by King County to remain u-__ __:=.c.:c::.. ___ areas required tor abow ground stonnwater control facilities including, but nol limited to. retention/detention ponds.'bidilnlatiol1 swa6es and setbacks from such ponds and swales ----"'='----areas required by Kmg County to be dedicated Of reseNed as on--stte recreation areas. Deduct 35.740 6.227 area 'l\lithin stormwatef control facility If requesting recreation space credit as allowed by KCC 21A.14.180. (see Section IV.) 0 ----~----regional utffity comdon, and 0 107.667 -'----other area5. exduding setbacks, required by King County to remain u- =='---Total reductions Calculation: 25-Mar--02 Page 2 ot 4 496.355 site area in square feet (see Section I.) 107,667 Tota, reductions 388.688 net buildable area in square feet NOTE: convert site area in square feet to acres by d~ng by 43,560 8.92 net buikiabie area in acres 0 •PLAT DENSITY AND DIM~ ,TIONS VI. Mfrer:;v;,re I.Jrban _ . (K C C 21 A 12 060) .. lhe minimum density requirement ~ QrHY to the R--4 through R-48 zones. Minimum deflsily is determined by multiplying the base density in ~ling units pef acre (see Section 11.) by the net build.able area of the site in acres (5E!e Secoon V.) and then multiplying the resulting pt"oduct by the mtnimum density percentage from the K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table. The minimum density requirements may be phased or waived by King County in certain cases. See K.C.C. 21A.12.060. Cak:ulation: ____ 4'-base density in du/ac (see Section II. 8.92 net buildable area in acres (see Section V.) ------c35~.6~9 X minimum den5ity % set forth in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 or as adjUSled in Section VII. ------~30=.34-minimum ~ling units required VII. t&oiroucn DeooitY Adjlsstrnmrts for Hodeca1e Slores (KC C 21A12 Q87J Residential de' cluµme-,its in the R--4. R-6 and R-8 zones may modify the mfnimum ~tactof in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 based on the wetghted average slope of the net~ area of the site (see Section V.). To detennine the 'Netghted average slope. a topographic survey is required to caku~e the net bulldable area(s) wtthln each ot the foHowtng slope increments and then multiplying the number ot square feet in each slope increment by the median slope value of each slope increment as foUows: ________ o_sq. ft 0-5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value + 0 sq n 5 • 1 D~; slope ,ncremen1X 7 5% median slopevelue + 0 sq. 11 10-15% slope 1ncrementX 12.5% median slope value + 0 sq. II 15-20% slope incrementX 17.5% med1on slope velue + 0 sq. 11 20-25~; slope mcrementX 2~.5% med,en slope value + O sq. 11 25-30% slope mcrement>O: 27 S~. med1on slope ve.lue + O sq. II 30-35% slope increment>: 32 s~~ med1en slope velue + 0 sq. 11 35-40~0 slope mcremen1><· 37 5% med1en slope velue ________ O Total square feet in net buik:iable area ______ a Totalsquarefeet adjusted for sk>pe Cakulation: ____ De.total square feet adjusted for slope divided by O total square feet in net buUdable area· ________ 'NetQhted aYef39e sJope of net buUdable area ---------% (Nole: multipty by 100 to convert to percent -round up to nearest whole percent) Use the table bek:lw to detennine the minimum dens.tty factOf. This~ is substituted fOf the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21 A.12.030 table when cak:u&ating the minimum denstty as shcM'n in Section VI. of this W'Ofksheet. Weighted AYeraQe Slope of Net Mtnimum Densny FadOf: Buildable Area(sl of Site: 0%-~than5% 85.00% 5% -less than 15% 83%, less 1 .5% tor each 1 % of avet"_..... .. a.-... in excess of 5% 15% -less than 40% 66%. less 2.0% fOf each 1% of -.,i........, in excess of 15% EXAMPLE CALCULATION FOR MINIMUM DENSITY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MODERATE SLOPES: ------==~sq.ft O -5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value + 10000 sq. 11 5-10% slope inoementX 7.5% medio.n slopevolue + 20000 sq 11 10-15% slope incrementX 12.5~-. medio.n slope value + sq. fl 15-20% slope mcrementX 17 5% medien slope velue + SQ II 20-25% slope mcrementX 22 5% median slope velue + sq fl 25-30% slope 1noementX 27 5% median slope velue + SQ. II 30-35% slope 1ncrememX 32.5% medion slope velue + sq 11 35--40% slope 1ncremen1X 37.5% medion slopevelue _____ ..;300=c.c0c:OcTotal square feet in net buHdable area Calculation: ___ _;3250="'-Total square feet adjusted for slope ___ 3250~_total square feet ad;u5ted fOf sk)p8 divided by total square feet in net buildable area _______ o_.1_1 weighted average slope of net buildable area ______ _;1~1~%"-% (Note: multi~ by 100 to conYert to percent -round up to nearest who6e pe1"Cent) Using the table ~. an 11 % weighted average slope of net buikf.abM! area fafb wtthin the 5% -less than 15% range whk:h has a minimum density factor ol 83%. less 1.5% fof each 1 % ol average slope in e>teess ol 5%. Since 11% is 6% abo\.te 5%. muttiptv 6 times 1.5 whkh woukt equal 9%. Subtract 9% from 83% fo, an adfusled minimum density factor of 74%. This replaces the minknum density factOf in K.C.C. 21 A.12.030 table. 25-Mar-02 Page 3 of 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 2500 . . PLAT DENSITY AND DIMENSION . _.ATIONS .. VIII. Harirourn Prl5cc Units Mowed CK C C 21 A 12 030: 040)· This section should be completed onty if the prOJX)Sal includes af)pication of residential density incentives (K.C.C. 21A.34) o.-translef of density credit (K.C.C. 21 A.36 Of 21 A.55). Maximum density is calculated by adding the bonus or transfer units authorized to the base units calculated in Section Ill. of this worbheet. The maximum density permitted through residential density incentives is 150 percent of the base density (see Section II.) of the underlying zoning of the deo. clq::,me,11 Of 200 percent of the base density tor prOfX)Sal5 with 100 percent affordable units. The maximum density permitted through transler of density credit is 150 percent of the base density (see Section II.) of the underlying zoning of the de-.cloprne,.11. ----'D~base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section II.} X 150% 0 maximum density ____ D~maximum density in dweUing units per acre X 11.3947429 site area in acr~-------------~O maximum <t-Netling unrts a'lowed utiliz;ng density incentiYes (K.C.C. 21 A.34) ____ De-base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section 11.) X 200% 0 maximum density ____ D_ maximum density in dwelling units per acre X 11.39 site area in acr~_-,:.,,-------------0 maximum dv,,elling units alk>wed utilizing density incentives with 100% affOfdable units (K.C.C. 21A.34) ____ D_base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section II.) X 150% ______ O maximum density ____ D_maximum density in ~ing units per acre X 11.3947429 site area in acr~-------------~O maximum dwelling units aUowed utNizing density translefs (K.C.C. 21A.36 or 21A.55) Cak:ulation: -------~D 0 base afk7twabie dvilelling units cak:ulated in Section Ill. + 0 bonus units authorized by K.C.C. 21 A.34 + 0 transfer units authonzed by K.C.C. 21A.36 or 21A.55 0 total ctNelling units (cannot ex~eed maximums calculated above) ------'- IX. Minimum Lot Area For Construction: Except as pror,,ided for nonconformanc::es in KCC 21 A.32: A. B. In the UR and R zones no construction shall be permitted on a lot that contains an area of k!5s than 2.500 square feet or that does not comptv with the applica~ minimum lot width, except for townhouse deo, clcp,.ents or zero-lot-'ine subdMSK>ns: and In the A. F. or RA zones: 1. Construction shall not be permttled on a lot containing less than 5,000 square teet; and 2. Construction shall be limited to one dvilelling unit and residential accessory uses for lots containing grealef than 5,000 square feet. bul less than 12,500 square feet. (KCC 21A.12.100) X. I gt Width· 25-M.ilf-02 Page 4 of 4 Lot widths shall be measured by scaling a circle of the applicable diameter within the boundaries of the lot as shown below, pl'<Mded that an access easement shall not be included within the cirde. (See KCC 21A.12.050). • .. .. · Table A.I. Summary of Downstream Drainage Complaints 89-0867 13802 160'° Avenue SE Drainage complaint not available. 95-0107 2101195 Steve Kohr Broken culvert at entrance to cul-de-sac. 97-0206 97-0318 97-0423 98-0202 15641 SE 138th Place 1110197 Don Gregg 16046 SE 142nd Place Type of Problem: Conveyance System Nuisance Problem: Not impacted by proposed project. Onsite mitigation: NIA Offsite flows impacting private property. Backyard flooded with larger storms. Septic system operation impacted. Investigated for Neighborhood Drainage Assistance Program. Type of Problem: Conveyance System Nuisance Problem. Chronic channel erosion. Channel erosion is likely to continue in future. Onsite mitigation: Level 2 Flow Control Standards 14038 56m Avenue SE Flooding due to plugged culvert. Drainage complaint is a claim and is not currently available. 14028 160m Avenue SE Roadside flooding -overflow of ditch along 160th Avenue SE. Drainage complaint not available. 3119197 Paul Huff Drainage from neighbor impacting low area of 14312 160th Avenue SE private property. Type of Problem: Conveyance System Nuisance Problem: Not impacted by proposed project. Onsite mitigation:· NIA a ;} t· { r r f • ( .-----------------------==-=-===--=------------- C'J c:, c:, "' ti '~ c· s; ~ ~ PIONEF'l NAllONAl TITLE INSURANCE A T'ICOR COMPANY F1lt-d !or H1~·11rd nt Requt.':(t of ". )'' AFTER RECORDING MAlL TO: 82.-·0 .,o,:. ;E .C· F CH .. i-iSL .... • • 3. 51) J _1;xm D. ~J.lbrath ·j 15624 S.E. 137tll Place '.:· Ren ten, \'!I\ 9605&, 7~--cc.cc...;.:..;_-"':.:.'-"-------- ;~ ---------------- ·.·, ;0x2i~~ ~~-;MD---..,\ ~\JG 1,\992 ) E068·'ll\9' ,·,. Statutory Warranty Deed ' :·.;:. I 22 t@lPOO 16 THF GK.-\:\TClR LOUIS [3. RIClu\PLSON ard R}'lMJN/\ M. RICHARDS.:JN, husblnd arrl wife, also shewn of record as Rcm:ma M. Richardson rvr anc\ in c1111•idt'r;11i,,n ,,1 $10.00 .)J)'.J othC'r valuable consideration in h:1m! ruiJ. com"t·y~ ;111d w;irr,-inc"' H• CON D. ~ULBAATH ard VEM JANICE Mll..BRA'Ilt, husbarrl ii.I'd wife "" th1• folluwini: ,!l'~..:rit,l'd rt·al t~l3!1'. ~i\U,lltd in \hf Cnunty n! wi .. hill~lon: KilJG , St.ate of lot 2 as describ:d in King County Short Plat No. 878133, reoordE.'d un.:l.cr King COUnty Recording No. 8002250639, reing a i:ortion oi tI'C Sl/2 of ilia Hl/2 oft-he NWl/4 of the NWl/4 of the SEl/4 of Section 14, Tcwnship 23 North, Range 5 East, h'.M., in King • COUnty, Washington, e.xcept county road. SUBJOCT 'IO all easarents, restrictions, reservations ard agreerrent.,; of record, if any; SCJBJB:T 'IO ·an:i reserving unto granters, their heirs am. assigns a oon-exclusive easem."lt for ingress, egress ard utilities .over, un:Ier and across the N 15 feet of the 1·1 187 feet (as treasured £:ran the ea.c;terly edge of county road ::-ight-of-way) Of said Let 2 of SOOrt 'Plat :k>. 878133, which easarent shall be appurtenant to and for tre unrestricted·use and enjoyrrent of the Nl/2 of the Nl/2 of the ~'Ml/4 of the NWl/4 of the SEl/4.of Section 14, Township 23 North,.Range S Eas' .. ~'1.M., with no obligation of granters to develope, maintain or make any prescril:xrl USt.., of said easererit e.xcept as they may dee:,, appropriate fran tirre to tine. ?UI'.TIT..tSTANDING the non-exclusivity of granters' resex:vation, granters unrestricted right to use the easarent area shall inClude, without limitation, the right to cor.trol, restrict or direct access therefran, direct grading, filling, surfacing or inproverrent thereof, to erect and maintain fences, gates, hedges or othel."Wi.se enclose or limit e.11closure of the easer.e!'lt area or any part: theteef, and to require an equitable contribution in ca.:5h for costs inc-.irred cy-grantors fran grantee, h1s heirs an:l assigns, 1:ased on gr.311tee' s use er reasonable anticipated use of i.nproverents or utilities placcl or to be placed within tl.:? easen-ent area. In uccep!:.i.ng a.-ii reoording this deed, grantee expressly cover.ants ard .:igrees to 00 l.::ound by the terms ard covenants of this reser,JOO easa-rent. Dated this . 6J:h,.,. / <lay of August, 19~2. Cminty of KING On 1his·day pa~nall:,-.1pp•::md 1.itlort' m, Louis B. Richardson arrl Rmrona-,.._Richardson 1<.1 nit knuwn tn he-the-h1di\'ill11 .. '5 dr.~rihrd in ;iud who. -~"'(lllf'•I thl' ~ithi~ tnd for~_,1ln1i~'Ftt\~umcnt, and acknowll'tli;l'd th:11 they ~i1tntd thl' -'-'"1t as thci,. r,rtt anrl ,·o'·mtary act and ~. for the ,' ., 6th '"'' "' August, 100~0~ Ir-Bf!.~ ©©Ill> t.%,«,l~-0-:;2.":.k .. "····-- \ ,, ,.,. . . . .. King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale A venue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Project Name: Evendell Plat Project Address: Portions of Sections 25 36 of T23N R5E Applicant: Mr. Mike Romano Address: Centurion Development Services 2261 7 81h Drive SE Bothell WA 98021 Phone: ( 425) 486-2563 Date: _y;z;/az_ ~01rUO 16 e.~,Y;f~f1.!;,,I:;• .\llf AJ"l:_!;3:p,l;~IG.J'!1.IVlA~YAI;,;" · •, 'REQlJIREiVlENTS/STANOARDS · ·•: .··. ,·iijd\~.···A,~:J.liJ.~illil:i'.!1\~E~tlJ:~11~:i:~:•;)~· < ' ' • DOES File No. LOIP0016 DOES Engineer/Planned Name: Bruce Whittaker, P.E. Design Engineer (submitting variance): Edward J. McCarth P .E. Signature: tJwqr-d ~-fflc(q~t~ Engineering Firm Name: Haozous Engineering, P.S. Address: 14816 S.E. 1161h Street Renton, WA 98059 Phone: 425 235-2707 Date: 2/25/02 {' .. ~ f•;,;• .. ,, ,,' :·c: ·.. v:~ .:-.,._,\ ''.),:; -~':';~ ·f,' ... '.' , ff_; ' 1"",. ~ "''!~-''f'r." " ,;3f. ·•;; , ... ff,/''>~," ·, ~ 1;<."1'< '· I, ,,)i;.\~ "-.'~." ' ~!j\:\,I>" "l\~,':' '. -~-~1,\:''.'i-;-·,;· -~,-{ .;~;j,:'\..",v J,' :,>i/ , 1' ·,., REFER,TO SECTION U IN-CHAPTER 1 OF. THE SURFACE WATER.DESIGN MANUAL'FOR VARIANCES' . '·,.;' ~ ' ' ' lo. ' ' ,\.c.. ' ~-., DESCRIPTION OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST: !,_Standard Request We request that the design of the storm water facility that manages storm water from developed portions ofEvendell be allowed to divert drainage from a net area of0.15 acre from the west basin to the east basin on the site. APPLICABLE SECTION(S) OF STANDARDS: The adjustment request is applicable to Core Requirement #I: Discharge at the Natural Location, Section 1.2.1 of the Surface Water Design Manual (King County Department ofNatural Resources, 1998). ,le.Ip JUSTIFICATION (see --page attachment): AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES· DOES Oirector/Oesignee Detennination: _ Approval _ Condition Approval (see below) -Denial _ ODES Approval Signed: Date: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: See attached memo dated: - DOES, Land Use Services Division, Engineering Review SupeMsor: ODES, Bldg. Serv. Div., Site Engineering & Planning Supervisor: Signed: Date: Signed: Date: ~ .,·,cfl'!ED .,.... l'I. 'i' . '· . ... . - . . King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055~1219 .. Evendell -Diversion of Drainage -Adjustment Request JUSTIFICATION: Description of Site The Evendell Plat project is a proposed residential development located within the Renton Highlands area of unincorporated King County. The proposal for development includes buildinl 75 single-family dwellings on approximately 12 acres. Road improvements along SE 136 Street are also proposed. The site is located within the Orting Hills subbasin of the Cedar River watershed (King County Department of Natural Resources, 1999). The site and area of offsite improvements consist of two basins. The east basin consists of9.84 acres under existing conditions. The topography of the east basin generally slopes from the northwest to the southeast. The west basin consists of I . 92 acres under existing conditions. The topography of the west basin generally slopes from the east to the west. The southwest corner of the site has an area of 0. 73 acre that is included in the westerly subbasin. Runoff from this subbasin sheet flows to adjacent yards of single-family residences to the southwest. Stormwater Design Under developed conditions, stormwater from the site and offsite road improvements will be collected and treated onsite to basic water quality standards. A combined wetpond/detention pond will be used to manage runoff in the easterly basin. A vault followed by a biofiltration swale will be used to manage runoff in the westerly basin. Level 2 RID standards are required by the King County Flow Application Maps and are recommended by Lower Cedar River Basin and Nonpoint Action Plan. Under developed conditions, the 0.73-acre area in the southwest corner of the site will be diverted from the westerly basin and collected in the onsite stormwater system in the easterly basin. To compensate for this diversion of drainage, an area of 0.58 acre in the northwest portion of the site will be diverted from the east basin to the west. The net result will be a diversion of0.15 acre from the west basin to the east basin. Managing runoff with the proposed diversions results in the following features: 0 Two stormwater facilities will be constructed. A larger combined wetpond/detention pond will manage runoff in the easterly basin and will discharge to the ditch system along 160th Avenue SE. A vault will be used ? • to manage runoff from the smaller westerly basin and will discharge to the ditch system along 156th Avenue SE. • The discharge locations from each basin will be to an engineered conveyance system. • The net diversion of0.15 acre is not anticipated to cause any problems in either of the two basins. References King County Department of Parks, Planning, and Resources, 1990. Sensitive Areas Map Folio. King County Environmental Division, 1990. Wetlands Inventory Notebook Volume 2 East. King County Department ofNatural Resources, 1998. Surface Water Design Manual. King County Surface Water Management Division, 1993a. Cedar River Current and Future Conditions Report. 1 • 1' 0: r ~ • e,1 g ~ ]' • r ;• < ~ ~ ~ N g ". ~ ~ ~ ::: ' 0 N .'. ii "' ,; ~ ., .. ~\\ 1 1 "j\ 'devwest'-0-'deveast' .t >l~~~~\ l '---=--~~L-~-~1 ·/ ,1 . ~~·,, ~ 11 ·~i SE 1 J8IH WATER QI l:!:I DX YAAJ 10'W X 30'L X 5.5'0 (INSIDE DIM.) TQP OF VAULT• 482.5 WAttR SURFACE= 482.0 1 l, N88d 14 '38 ''W 1306 8 • OET. VOL• 1.500 Cf' \ L k BOT. DET,• 477.0 .~ -~-~§°1t}JJ~~t. 1_36th,?_g~~-~-~~ T I ("\I\ \ ~\ I "' .,---- I 3 ~·~..:8'--i,'-. ~ ____ SITO;:W 4~vc oM EAST ro eO . 0.58 ~ '"'~ ~ ~~ L ~ -~ ~~~ '"''" 56 /. 75 j 7/i 73 I s'-\ ~e ,~'fad~ _/J / 1~- 1-._.,, !rill I~ -57 .r ~ ~~_72_ ~ I "59~7 I 71 _J L I I I -__:::::::::::--1 J _l_J_J 0. 73 AJ DIVERTED FROM WEST TO EAST Lot 7 Rose .... ~ ~ "'.... -· ~ . I . -L TE· t-·-· /--:=:~ AC-r~ I . . . ; 51/60 I 69 y 68 7::: l/~--_"J,:-t-1-_r' 63 . 64 · 65 / I 1 /\ 66 f=i =-x: ; .. - I ~D& BUf'FER.._ 75\ AC \\ "-.......,\ :1,4.\ ~ " 0 \"----" 1 u ~ \ ~=-= ! Q -'-'~'~" I '-K\i I . .WO:.!' • • -'.'.'-:: c- Iii ico '.:21 s I ~x a. ! ~:j :I ; m: a. ~o g ~~ 2 :, ;-~ 8 '.:21~ w li! m:0 l2 0 Iii ~ . 'ij Q.." C)C) N s N .. " b! 0) ~· • c= I ! €. ..... -,n ti~-~ ~ ~ V ffi'"ll .. = ~I~ •l""I ~::::1~0 ~i51i" ~~§~ t ~ ~ ~Ii 0 .. ~ ia le oi ::I 15 ::c: -~ § ~M12 • t.,0 2 , .. .. GARRY STRUTlHIEIRS ASSOC!A TES, INC. Date: Januarv 29_ 2002 To: Mike Romano Centurion Development Services From: Garv A. Norris_ P.E. Subject: Response to ODES Screening Memo dated September 26. 200 I 3150 Richards Road, Suite JOO Bellevue, WA 98005-4446 (425) 519-0300 (phone) (425) 519-0309 (fax) Project Name: Evendell Project No. 01-002.07 P:_l T: '...:;· !,~.,: ~\,)' .(l-, Per King County Department of Development and Environmental Services' (DOES) Screening6':i;-' Memorandum dated September 26, 2001, additional issues need to be addressed for the proposeo plat of Evendell. This technical memorandum includes responses to the following traffic-related elements requested by DD ES: ODES Comment: Provide AM Peak hour volumes and LOS analysis To determine if the AM peak or the PM peak is the "worst case" condition, the Consultant collected AM peak period turning movement counts at the four analysis intersections. As shown in Table I, the results of the AM peak hour counts indicate the AM peak hour volumes arc lower than the PM peak hour volumes at three of the four analysis intersections. Therefore, the PM peak hour is considered the -'worst case" condition. Table 1 Volume Summary Total Entering Volume Intersection AM PM SE 128th St/148th Ave SE 1.817 1.979 SE 128th St/156th Ave SE 1.894 2,317 SE 136th St/156th Ave SE 1.062 889 SE 128th St/160th Ave SE 1.379 1.651 Table 2 summarizes the AM peak hour level of service for the 2004 with project condition. The AM peak hour traffic volumes are summarized in the Technical Appendix. c:\windows\temp\techrnemoevendell.doc 1/29/02 (mjr) Exhibit No.__,_/...::()'----- Item No.LO tfOottp -t 1..,0 IT'l'IO/ Roeelvad 3 -lo -03 King County Hearing Examiner I Memorandum January 29, 2002 Page 2 .. Table_ 2 AM Peak Hour Level of Service Intersection SE 128th St/148th Ave SE SE 128th St/156th Ave SE SE 136th St/156th Ave SE WBLT' (xx) -seconds of delay per vehicle l -level of service with bypass traffic volumes 2004 With Project' B (11.7) B (16.0) E (37 3) 2 -movement with the highest delay. the·remaining movements will operate at an acceptable level of service. As shown in Table 2, all analysis intersections would operate at an acceptable level of service in 2004 with the project for the AM peak hour. ODES Comment: The opening of SE 1 36th St. will allow other neighborhood trips to use the SE 136th St. route to access onto 156th Ave. SE. Please reevaluate traffic volume in the area to determine the future volumes on SE 1 36th St. between 156th Ave. SE and 160th Ave. SE. An estimate of future PM peak hour volumes on SE 136th Street was made by comparing existing and future travel times between the alternative routes created with the opening of SE 136th Street between 156th Avenue SE and 160th Avenue SE. Table 3 summarizes tbe results oftbe travel time analysis. Table 3 Travel Time Analysis Travel Origin Destination Via Time /seconds\ SE 136th St/l60th West of SE 128th St/156th Ave SE SE 128th St & 160th Ave SE 131 Ave SE 136th St/160th West of SE 128th St/156th Ave SE SE 136th St & 156th Ave SE 129 Ave SE 136th St/160th West of SE 128th St/156th Ave SE SE 136th St & 158th Ave SE 140 Ave West of SE 128th St/ SE 136"' St/160th Ave SE' SE 128th St & 160th Ave SE 113 156th Ave SE West of SE 128th St/ SE 136'" St/l60th Ave SE 156th Ave SE &SE 136th St 128 156th Ave SE West of SE 128th St/ SE 136'h St/160th Ave SE SE 128th St. 158th Ave SE. 122 156th Ave SE & SE 136th St 156th Ave SE/ 158th Ave SE/SE 128th St SE 136th St. 158th Ave SE 101 SE 136th St 156th Ave SE/ 158th Ave SE/SE 128th St 156th Ave SE. SE 128th St 80 SE 136th St 158th Ave SE/SE 156th Ave SE/SE 136th St SE 128th St. 156th Ave SE 108 128th St 158th Ave SE/SE 156th Ave SE/SE 136th St 158th Ave SE. SE 136th St. IOI c:\Wlndows\temp\techmemoevendell.doc 1/29/02 (mjr) .' Memorandum January 29. 2002 Page 3 128th St .. Based on the travel time studies, eastbound traffic on SE I 28th Street destined southbound on 160th Avenue SE would continue to use SE 128th Street rather than SE 136th. Street. However, northbound traffic on 160th Avenue SE destined westbound on SE 128th Street would use SE 136th Street. This is a result of the reduction in travel time created by the signal at the SE I 28th Street/156th Avenue SE intersection. Furthermore. the existence ofa traffic signal at the SE 128th Street/ 156th Avenue SE intersection provides the motorist with a degree of certainty that access to SE. I 28th Street will be provided within a specified time period. Therefore, it was estimated 34 PM peak hour trips would be diverted from 160th Avenue SE to 156th Avenue SE with the opening of SE 136th Street. PM peak hour traffic generated from the residential neighborhood along 158th Avenue SE destined to the south (4 vph) on 156th Avenue SE would use SE 136th Street; one (I) trip destined west on 128th Avenue SE and two (2) trips originating from the east on SE 128th Street would use SE 136th Street; three (3) trips originating from the north on 156th Avenue SE would use SE 136th Street; and all traffic originating from the north and destined to the south (2 vph) on 160th Avenue SE would use SE 136th Street. The trip distribution/traffic assignment for the PM peak hour future with project condition was revised based on the estimated preferred routes with SE 136th Street opened from 156th Avenue SE to 160th Avenue SE. Table 4 summarizes of the level of service with the revised traffic volumes at the impacted intersections. The AM peak hour level of service is provided for comparison. Table 4 Peak Hour Level of Service PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour lntenection 2004 With Pro;ect' 2004 With Proiect' SE !28th St/156th Ave SE B (19 2) C (20.l) SE 136th St/156th Ave SE EBLT' C (19 I) C(l9.7) WBLT 4 (xx) -seconds of delay per vehicle l -level of service as determined in TIA (without bypass traffic volumes) 2 -PM peak hour level of service with bypass traffic volumes 3 -AM peak hour level of service with bypass traffic volumes AM Peak Hour 2004 With Prou,ct' B(15.7) E (37.3) 4 -movements with the highest delay. the remaining movements will operate at an acceptable level of service. As shown in Table 4, the impacted intersections would operate at an acceptable level of service with the opening of SE 136th Street and the addition of project-generated traffic. Additional Analyses: Lefi and right turn lane warrants Left and right tum lane warrants were conducted at the SE 136th Street/160th Avenue SE, site access/ 160th Avenue SE, and the SE 136th Street/ 156th Avenue SE intersections for the 2004 with project condition. Results of the analysis indicate that neither a left-tum nor a right-tum lane is warranted on 156th Avenue SE at SE 136th Street. As determined by the level of service analysis, the westbound left tum movement at this intersection would operate at an acceptable level, therefore, a westbound left tum lane is not warranted. For the SE 136th Street/160th Avenue SE intersection, c:\Windows\temp\techmemoevendeU.doc 1/29/02 (mjr) I Memorandum January 29. 2002 Page 4 .. neither a left-tum nor a right turn lane is warranted. Results of the warrant analysis indicate that neither a left-tum nor a right-tum lane is warranted at the site access/16Dth Avenue SE intersection. Additional Analyses: Roadwav Classification . . A review of the King County Road Standards indicate that SE 136th Street under the R-4 Alternative would be considered a subcollector since the roadway would serve less than 100 single- family dwelling units and since it would connect to a neighborhood collector (160th Avenue SE). Under the R-6 Alternative. SE 136th Street from 156th Avenue SE to 158th Avenue SE would be considered a subcollector since the roadway would serve less than 100 single-family dwelling units. A total of74 PM peak hour trips were estimated to use SE 136th Street between 156th Avenue SE and 158th Avenue SE in 2004 with Evendell including pass-through trips. SE 136th Street from 15 8th Avenue SE to 160th Avenue SE would again be considered a subcollector since the roadway would service less than I 00 single-family dwelling units. A total of 58 PM peak hour trips were estimated to use SE 136th Street between 158th Avenue SE and 160th Avenue SE in 2004 with Evendell including pass-through trips. Conclusions • AM peak hour volumes were found to be generally lower than the PM peak hour volumes. • The AM peak hour level of service analysis determined that the analysis intersections would operate at acceptable level of service for the 2004 with project condition. As determined in the Traffic Impact Analysis. all analysis intersections would operate at an acceptable level of service for the PM peak hour in 2004 with the project. • A total of 74 PM peak hour and a total of 62 AM peak hour trips are estimated to use SE 136th Street from 156th Avenue SE to 158th Avenue SE. From 158th Avenue SE to 160th Avenue SE, a total of 58 PM peak hour and 50 AM Peak hour trips arc estimated to use SE 136th Street if opened. • Since both sections of SE 136th Street would serve less than 100 single-family dwelling units, SE 136th Street from 156th Avenue SE to 160th Avenue SE is considered a subcollector per the King County Road Standards. • The two impacted intersections would operate at an acceptable level of service for both the 2004 AM and PM peak hours with the project and diverted traffic volumes. c:\windows\temp\techmemoevendell.doc 1/29/02 (mjr) 22617-8"' Dr. SE Bothell. WA 98021 ~ CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES lLG l PO a,, :p 6 (425) 486-2563 OFF (425) 486-3273 FAX March 25, 2002 C, k• Karen Scharer, Planner II ::,. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services &:; Land Use Services Division f;] 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW re Renton, WA 98055-1219 f:! RE: 151 Request for Information -Rezone and Plat of EVENDELL Application Numbers: L01TY401 & L01P0016 Dear Karen: § On behalf of our client, U.S. Land Development Associates, please find the following in response to the referenced Request for Information: o 10 copies of a revised 70 Lot R-6 Alternative Preliminary Plat Map o 10 copies of a revised 46 Lot R-4 Alternative Preliminary Plat Map o 10 copies of a plan titled "16d" A 118. SE Frontage lmpro11ements. R-4 Altemati11e" o 1 O copies of a plan titled "136"' A 118. SE Preliminary Road Jmpro11ement Plan" o 10 copies of the revised R-6 Alternative Density Calculations o 10 copies of the revised R-4 Alternative Density Calculations o 10 copies of a Downstream Drainage Complaints Table o 10 copies of a Drainage Variance Request w/ Revised Onsite Drainage Sub-basins Map o 10 copies of an existing Drainage Easement o 10 copies of a Memorandum dated January 29, 2002 prepared by Garry Struthers Associates, Inc. _I.-· RESPONSE TO SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 NOTICE OF REQUEST Drainage: o K. C. Comment -"Le11e/ 1 Analysis: Please evaluate the downstream drainage complaints and categorize them as to se11erity per Core Requirement 2 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. Indicate in the analysis how the proposal mitigates for these problems per Core 2. Apparently, complaint #97-03 18(Gregg) is still a problem e11en though a new cul11ert was installed by King County. The remaining drainage complaints should also be evaluated per Core 2." RESPONSE: Enclosed please find 10 copies of a table identified as "Table A.1. Summary of Downstream Drainage Complaints" prepared by Haozous Engineering. The table indicates the various downstream complaints, categorizes their severity, describes if they are or are not impacted by the project and, if they are impacted, how such impacts are mitigated by the proposal. "Let us take the load. ·· • ... Karen Scharer November 30, 2000 Page: 2 of7 Please note that some of the complaints are current claims against the County. Accordingly, King County WLRD staff would not allow our review of those documents. o K. C. Comment-"Show the existing onsite subbasins on the conceptual drainage plan." o A drainage diversion adjustment is required for the proposed shift in post-developed basins. RESPONSE: Attached please find 10 copies of a drainage variance request and technical justification prepared by Haozous Engineers and dated 2/25/2002. The variance requests approval of diversion of a net area of .15 acres from the west basin to the east basin of the project site. Included within the technical justification is a conceptual drainage plan indicating the existing onsite subbasins and the requested diversion. o Provide a copy of a drainage easement for the proposed conveyance from the west portion of the site to 156" Ave SE. If an easement does not exist, provide a letter of intent from the property owner to execute an easement. RESPONSE: Please find enclosed 10 copies of the referenced easement document. Roads: Traffic Impact Analysis: o Provide AM Peak hour volumes and LOS analysis. o The opening of SE 136th St. will allow other neighborllood trips to use the SE 136 St. route to access onto 156 Ave SE. Please reevaluate traffic volumes in the area to determine the future volumes on SE 136 St. between 156 Ave SE and 160th Ave SE. The existing TIA did not account for existing and future traffic using this route. "Let us take the load " Karen Scharer November 30, 2000 Page 3 of7 RESPONSE: Enclosed please find 10 copies of a memorandum report prepared by Garry Struthers Associates dated January 29, 2002. The report finds that the PM Peak is considered the worst case condition. In addition, the report finds that a total of 74 PM peak hour and a total of 62 AM peak hour trips are estimated to use SE 136111 St. between 156111 Ave. SE and 158111 Ave. SE. And that a total of 58 PM peak hour and a total of 50 AM peak hour trips are estimated to use SE 136111 St. between 158"' Ave. SE and 160111 Ave. SE. This results in a functional classification for SE 136th St. as a "Subcollector'' per KCRS. Finally, an analysis was conducted to determine if tum lanes were warranted for impacted intersections. Results of the analysis indicate that tum lanes are not warranted at any of the affected locations. o It appears that 158" Ave SE as it enters the site could serve more than 100 lots if the rezone is approved. You would assume the undeveloped parcels that will be served by 158" Ave SE would also be rezoned to R6. They do not have access to 156th Ave SE that can meet King County Road Standards for intersection spacing. Therefore a second full access should be provided to the east to 160th Ave SE. RESPONSE: The revised R-6 alternative preliminary plat indicates a potential single-family development layout for the properties lying west of the subject site. Based on current King County and City of Renton codes we believe that 39 lots could be sited on the affected properties. In addition, the revised plat indicates that 57 of the 70 total Evendell lots would take access via the plat entry road. The combined total number of lots anticipated to take access via 158111 Ave. SE as it enters the plat then is 96, four less than that required to trigger a second access under KCRS. Accordingly, a second access is not warranted and is therefore not proposed. SE 136th St. will function as a neighborhood collector street. King County Road Standards does not allow for a reduction in right of way dedication for a neighborhood collector street. Therefore 26 feet of right of way is required throughout the plat frontage on SE 136th St. RESPONSE: Per the above described report SE 136"' Street will function as a Subcollector road at the 2004 horizon year with all pipeline projects and anticipated existing neighborhood cut-through traffic taken into account. "Let us take the load ... Karen Scharer November 30, 2000 Page 4 of7 However, we understand the County's concern that over an extended period of time traffic on SE 136111 Street may increase to Neighborhood Collector volumes. Accordingly, in the interest of compromise and consistent with our original submittal, we propose the following: a. Provision of a Neighborhood Collector standard half-street contained within a Subcollector standard 48' width right of way between 160111 Ave. SE and 158111 Ave. SE. This will require dedication by the project site of 18' of right of way in this section. In reference to concerns voiced by County staff at our meeting on January 30111 , 2002 about the adequacy of a half street section please note that per KCRS 2.07 "a half-street may be permitted as an interim facility when: 1. Such street shall not serve as primary access (emphasis added) to more than 35 dwelling units or tall lots; and 2. Such alignment is consistent with or will establish a reasonable circulation pattern; and 3. There is a reasonable assurance of obtaining the prescribed additional right-of-way from the adjoining property with topography suitable for completion of a full-section road." In this case all of the criteria are met since: (11 Construction of this section of SE 136111 Street will provide primary access to 4 Evendell lots and only new secondary access to all others; (2) The alignment will establish a reasonable and highly desirable circulation pattern and; (3) There is 30' of existing right of way north of the subject property and the topography is suitable. b. Provision of a full width Neighborhood Collector standard road contained within a 50' width right of way between 158"' Ave. SE and 156111 Ave. SE ellcept that we would not construct the north sidewalk. This will require dedication of 20' of right of way to approllimately the west line of Joint Use Driveway Tract 'A' .. West of this point, in order to accommodate an additional 4' of traveled way width, 26' of right of way would be dedicated. "Let 11s take the load ... , Karen Scharer November 30, 2000 Page 5 of7 Please note that the proposed right of way widths are more than adequate to contain the physical requirements of a neighborhood collector road. Dry utilities consisting of natural gas, power, cable TV and phone lines will be located in easements on the adjoining lots so no right of way is required for these facilities. • Provide a sight distance analysis for the access onto 16d" Ave SE. RESPONSE: Because the R-6 proposal will not be providing a secondary access to 160"' Ave. SE analysis pertinent to that proposal was not performed. However, entering and stopping sight distance information was provided on the original R-4 Alternative preliminary plat map. In addition, further analysis has been performed in conjunction with the revised R-4 alternative due to the relocated access point and is indicated on the attached plan titled "16<f' Alie. SE Frontage lmpro11ements, R-4 Alternative". • Provide a preliminary engineering plan for frontage improvements along SE 136th ST and 160th A VE SE. The improvement plan should include urban neighborhood collector standards on the plat's frontage and a centerline profile. RESPONSE: Attached please find 10 copies each of the referenced plans. Please note that the plan provided for improvements along 160"' Ave. SE is in conjunction with the R-4 Alternative which proposes plat access via 160"' Ave. SE. With regard to the R-6 proposal neither primary nor secondary access is proposed via 160"' Ave. SE. In addition, our trip generations indicate only 3 PM peak hour trips to the south and 2 PM peak hour trips to the north from the intersection of SE 136"' Street with 160"' Ave. SE. Accordingly, full frontage improvements along 160"' Ave. SE to Urban Neighborhood Collector standards are not warranted given project impacts. However, we anticipate pedestrian impacts along 160"' Ave. SE by children walking to school. In the e:itisting condition there is little to no shoulder along the project frontage. Accordingly, in the interest of compromise and a desire to provide a safe walking route we would agree to construction of an 8' wide paved shoulder and relocation of the drainage ditch along the project frontage. This proposal is reflected on the revised preliminary plat map. "Let 11s take !he load. ,. .. Karen Scharer November 30, 2000 Page 6 of7 • Direct access to a neighborhood collector by driveways and joint use driveways are not allowed. Revise access for lots 54, 55, and 29. RESPONSE: Although SE 136th Street will function as a "Subcollector" the R-6 plan has been revised to comply with this comment. • Document that the existing house will comply with setback and parking requirements ofKCC 21. A. RESPONSE: The eidsting house will be sited to meet all KCC 21A requirements. KCC 21.A.12.030 requires 5' minimum interior setbacks. Further, for lots taking access from a private tract note 16 specifies that vehicle access points for garages, carports and fenced parking areas be setback a minimum of 26' from the center- point of the parking area to the opposite side of the access tract. Per the revised R-6 alternative preliminary plat map 10' side yard setbacks are provided. In addition, the ellisting home has a 2 car garage that is in alignment with rather than perpendicular to the access tract. The distance to the center of the garage from the near line of the access tract is about 20'. KCC 21.A.18.030 requires that Single Family Detached homes provide 2 off-street parking spaces. The ellisting garage meets that requirement. II. RESPONSE TO OCTOBER 2, 2001 NOTICE OF REQUEST • Wetland impacts have been evaluated by ODES Senior Ecologist. Laura Casey, see memo dated September 27, 2001. Please address the concerns and make revisions to the plans as required. • In addition to the previous request for additional information, provide calculations. as needed, for disturbance of wetland and wetland buffer area that would occur as a result of road improvements, per technical staff comments in the September 26, 2001 Screening Transmittal. For your convenience, a copy of the memo from Laura Casey and previous Screening Transmitttal are attached. "Let 11s rake the load. ·· Karen Scharer November 30, 2000 Page 7 of7 RESPONSE: The revised R-6 and R-4 Attemative preliminary plat maps have been revised to eliminate buffer averaging. Ms. Casey's comments regarding maintenance of wetland hydrology are noted. We do not anticipate the placement of any utilities within the wetland area or it's buffer outside of those to be installed in conjunction with construction of SE 136th Street, the impilcts of which are detailed on the revised plat map and associated SE 136th Street Frontage Improvement Plan. In addition, the provision of a widened paved walkway and relocated ditch along 160th Ave. SE will result in wetland buffer impacts. These impacts are detailed on the revised preliminary plat map. With regard to the R-4 Altemative we anticipate wetland buffer impacts due to construction of the Urban Neighborhood Collector improvements along the 160th Ave. SE frontage. These impacts are indicated on the revised plat map and further detailed on the 160th Ave. SE Frontage Improvement Plan. III. R-4 Altemative -Elimination of SE 136th Street ROW Dedication Given that the R-4 altemative does not impact unopened SE 136th Street ROW and creates no impacts that require opening SE 136th Street we have modified our proposal to eliminate the 26' right of way dedication originally indicated. Please note that lots 11, 12 and 13 have been designed to comply with Section 21A.12.160.A. Setbacks -Required Modifications. Accordingly, the density calculations have been revised to reflect the increase in site area and resulting increase in the allowable number of lots from 45 to 46. Please call me at (425) 486-2563 if you have any questions regarding the material submitted via this transmittal or if you require any additional information. Thank you for your efforts. Enclosures CC: U.S. Land Attn: Howard Stansbury Sincerely, CENTURION DEVE:zT SERVICES ~J Michael J. Romano Land Consultant "Let us take the load. ·· r , .. King County DDES _ LMl) USE SER VICES DIVISION 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 93055 .. DROP-OFF rOR LUSD ONLY Cover Sheet ... •.• * * * *"."'."' * .. * • • "'IL'tfPORTANT· • • .. • • • "'* • * * * * • • "· Date Received by LUSD PROJECT Nl:ii'rfBER AND NA1'rfE rs NECESSARY FOR ALL DROP-OFF Project No. .L (Jj,P 00/ (;, Project Name E VL::.tvP.cL.t -. C¢:)yTv.t'4 h, £}LY, s' vc: J FROM: /1if£ ?t;l1~-f/YVt7 Company Nam&oat'ct Pen-00 Telephone No. yi<,-:f"f'6-z1-£.s , K.C. D.D.E.S. UESTED BY KC STAFF (pie= print) Lot Line Adiustment Permit Please specify item(s) drop-off Ri'!ht of Way Permit Please specify item(s) drop-off Gradin',!!Oearin',! Permit C..o--;;...v DD;;). q:: Additional Ia(. requested, pie= jpecify itwJ(j) drop--Off · ,.. -(l-, 1 ---~------__J~(W~ :::-:-Other.-. ----~--=---=---=--=--=--=--=-======~l73b 2-- •••**~ •• "'* * * * • • • • •• "•• • • • ••• ..... ••••NOTE._.,.••••••""••••••••*•••*••••,., ..... *"'"*•• ·OO/OJ/98 All drop-off itern(1) will be Jogged into th~ computer under the pruJect number, therefore. ltJ imporunt that the top portioa of thi, form i, completed pruperly before you drop-off aayth.ing. ~.\jjirtance in finding a proje1:t aurnbc!r on b-e provided by jpc::iling to 2: Land U3-e Se~c~ Division Pc::noa of the Day (POD), or cbe Zoaing/La..nd U:se Technici::w... Your cooperation jj iIDport:int, th:mk you. @ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest February 26, 2002 Mike Romano Centurian Development Services 22617 8'h Drive SE Bothell, WA 98021 RE: Time Extension Application No. LOITY401 & LOIPOOI6-Evendell Dear Mr. Romano: .. The purpose of this letter is in response to your request for extension of time to submit additional information to complete review of the rezone and plat. Your request for extension of time until April 5, 2002 is granted. When submitting the requested information, include copies of the letters requesting information and retain copies for your records. Provide a cover letter, which lists how each item, was addressed. Any clarification or explanation of the submittal can also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN: Karen Scharer, Planner II, Current Planning Section 900 Oaksdale A venue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 If the submittal is hand delivered, submit at the address above. Your application is on "hold" from the date of this notice, until the date you are advised that the additional information satisfies this request, or 14 days after the date the information has bee!). provided. You will be notified if the Division determines that the informati.on is insufficient. Please note that the supplemental information required after vesting of a complete application shall not affect the validity of such application. The deadline for the submittal of the information previously requested is now April 5, 2002. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist, which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request, in writing, for consideration by this Department. Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If possible, please submit all of the information in one package. If you have any questions, regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-7114 or by e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov. ~·· ~---- Karen~ c.,re.:/.:::;,i:; s~""" / cc: Application File • ~ .. CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (425) 486!2563 OFF (425) 486-3273 FAX 22617-8"' Dr. SE Bothell. WA 98021 LCL F:·, / '] P" 1. • ...,8 I, I.(• l'.; February 15, 2002 Karen Scharer King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Re: Evendell (KCDDES File #L01P0016 Request for Time Extension Dear Karen: : ' " , .. r,.1.., . ..,•.D.i.S. On behalf of our client, U.S Land Development Associates, we would like to request an extension of the deadline for submission of the supplemental information requested by the County in your September 26, October 2, and November 13, 2001 Notices of Request for Additional Information to April 5, 2002. We are preparing submission of the required materials, however, due to the complexity of the issues involved we require more time to complete the supplemental studies. Please call me at (425) 486-2563 if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, CENTURION DEVELOPMEN RVICES 1J/;llfat---r-- Michael J. Romano Land Consultant ··Let us take the load. " --· -·· .. ~WPS K!gg._{.ounty Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 December 21, 2001 Marilyn Carlson 13616 156"' Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 RE: Proposed Plat & Rezone of Evendell (ODES File Numbers LOIP0016 & LOITY401) Dear Ms. Carlson: .. Thank you for your letter expressing concerns regarding growth in your area, specifically the proposed subdivision and rezone of Evendell. This project is a proposal to rezone 13 acres of property from R-4 to R-6 and to divide the site into 75 lots for detached single-family homes. Should the rezone not be granted, the applicant has proposed an alternative to subdivide a smaller portion of 11.46 acres under R-4 zoning into 44 lots for development of single-family use: In reviewing and making recommendations for this proposal, staff will evaluate this project for compliance with the codes and regulations regarding zoning, traffic, drainage, etc., as well as consider the issues you've raised. In the interim, you have been made a party of record for this proposal and will be notified of the public hearing and future decisions on this proposal. If you would like to review the information contained in the file for this project, please contact ODES at (206) 296-6647. If you have further questions, please call me at (206) 296-7114. Cc: Bruce Whittaker, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Kris Langley, Supervising Engineer, Traffic Development Review, KCDOT Application File , Marilynn Carlson November 7, 2001 13616 156th Ave se Renton, WA 98059 .. , , 425-226-6178 home 425-376-7486 work:. . '(_'. : .. J. Evendell Plat file# L01TY401 & L01P0016 Applicant: Howard Stansbury U.S. Land Development Assoc. KCC 21a.06.1172 Dear Ms. Scharer, Following are my comments on this development: Runoff: When the 10 acres along 160th Ave se was developed for the existing dwelling, the water on that property was diverted off, at least in part, to those of us to the west. My neighbor behind me Don Milbrath had water in his pasture and I had water standing in my backyard and under my house. The gravel toad 137th St was damaged and still has erosion occur to it during heavy rains. I myself had to put in a trench drain to remove the runoff to my front yard. I am NOT going to be able to take any more runoff. It appears that my land in from could already be sinking form too much water and my drainfield is also further down in my front yard. T.he water off this property to be developed also flows to the southwest through property where my horse is boarded. The land where my horse is has a drainage ditch through it, and the pasture along 160th already has deep standing water every winter. Twice my horse has become very ill because of floodwaters getting so high it ran into the barn. I do not want my horse to become ill again or pay unnecessary vet bills because of runoff from other's land. Stormwater detention ponds are a dismal failure. They take little of the runoff and fill up to the outlet pipe almost immediately. In addition with no fish, movement or chemicals they become a breeding ground for mosquitos. Adding chemicals is really not an option for the health of the neighborhood. Furthermore as with all man made systems, this drainage solution would wear out. Pipes become clogged and break and in a couple of decades or so it could become useless. Natural drainage, absorption and ground cover are the only permanent solutions to water problems. tr· .. .. Environmental: Unfortunately with most all new developments they are not made environmentally sound. This can be seen with the developments west of us in Renton. The developers rape the land of all vegetation, take off the topsoil and make the whole development impervious surface. The amount of top soil that is put back is very little which means the surface water runs off in the winter and in the summer the water . use is increased. With the lack of permeable surface the aquifers are also not being recharged. The trees and other vegetation give various benefits to the whole community, including air cleansing, wind buffers, oxygen production, surface water management, recharging aquifers, and of course beauty. Our neighborhoods in this area are full of vegetation. Developments with no vegetation buffers do not fit in our community. Traffic: In the 11 years I have lived on 156th Ave, the traffic has gone from a busy road to a freeway. Many many times we have complained to the county. {To no avail} We have thousands of cars a day as it is now; we can take no more, especially at 35mph. It is a very dangerous road and it is unfair to make one set of citizens' take the entire traffic load for four major areas. We have traffic from Fairwood, Issaquah, Maple Valley and the Highlands. Our community has told both Renton and King County that we need at least two more roads off our hill. They both have refused to do anything. For the safety of our neighborhood and those who pass through, we need alternate routes to escape off this hill. A natural disaster, or in these times terrorism, could cut off 156th and/or make Renton to the west impassable. As it stands now 156th is the only road to the south for the whole area, this is unacceptable. Before more developments are put into east Renton and our area, we need more roads. New developments should be required to have thru roads in them. Cul de sacs create traffic problems. The developments increase traffic and they should help share in the solution. If there are urban densities then an urban grid pattern of roads is needed, not dead-ends and cul de sacs. .. Upzone: This area east of Renton in King County is zoned R-4. All citizens are supposed to be treated the same. for too long developers, contractors, and 'special' individuals have been given extra rights. If all the other properties in the area as R-4 then this development should also be R-4 not upzoned to R-6. I am also wondering about the waste disposal. This area is on septic systems and the area was supposed to be off limits to any more septics. The development specs say nothing about sewer. If there is to be a sewer are we , going to be forced to pay for the profits of another developer? Suggestions for the Development Until separate roadways to the south are built no more development should occur. If we are forced to accept the development, the following should be the minimum requirements: 1} R-4 not R-6 2} A perimeter of natural vegetation at least 20 ft wide should surround the development except for ingress and egress, 3} Leaving the total amount of depth of topsoil as it is now on the property, with the exception of the dwelling foundation. 4} If there are sewers going to the property the developer pays for the whole cost unless another property owner wants to connect. Sincerely, .-~,<~- ~4-c/· Marilynn Carlson Cc Ron Sims ® c--J ODES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 December 19, 2001 Mike Romano Centurian Development Services 22617 8th Drive SE Bothell, WA 98021 RE: Application for the Preliminary Plat ofEvendell ODES File No. L01P0016 Dear Mr. Romt1no: Thank you for your December 10, 2001 request for an extension of the dea~line for the submittal of the additional information required to process the preliminary plat application of Evendell. The request for additional information stops all processing of the plat application until the required information is received. The time spent waiting for information to be submitted is not counted toward any time limit requirements of the plat application process. The October 2, 2001 and November 13, 2001 letters established a deadline of January 2, 2002 for the submittal of additional information. We are granting a final extension to this deadline. If the Land Use Services Division ofDDES does not receive the necessary information requested to process your application by March 2, 2002, your application may be canceled or denied. lfyou have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (206) 296-6758. Siincerel~~ T Bull, Planner II C Planning Section, LUSD Cc: Kim Claussen, Planner III, Current Planning Section, LUSD Karen Scharer, Planner II, Current Planning Section, LUSD Bruce Whittaker, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Kris Langley, Supervising Engineer, Traffic & Engineering, KCDOT Laura Casey, Senior Ecologist, Site Development Services, LUSD Larry West, Senior Geologist, Site Development Services, LUSD Application File Howard Stansbury, U.S. Land Development Associates C/0 Centurion Development Services 22617 8th Drive SE, Bothell, WA 98021 ' -· ( King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest 1'/ovember 13,2001 Mike Romano Centurian Development Services 22617 3th Drive SE Bothell, WA 98021 RE: Sensitive Area Development Constraints Application 1'10. LOITY 401 & LOIP00!6 -Evendell Dear Mr. Romano: .. The purpose of this letter is in response to the questions raised during our October 24, 2001 meeting regarding constraints on development due to the on-site wetland. Subsequently, our sensitive area staff met with Tom Deming, Habitat Technologies to discuss your proposed plat. Laura Casey presented the proposal for wetland buffer averaging. and impacts to wetlands. The summary of comment_s resulting from this meeting is as follows: • Buffer reduction, as part of a buffer averaging proposal is not acceptable in a forested buffer. • This proposal for buffer averaging does not meet the buffer averaging criteria, because it does not enhance the functions of the wetland. • Potentially acceptable to reduce the buffer through buffer averaging where the buffer has been previously cleared, although scientific literature shows that 25 -50 foot buffers are not very effective. • lfbuffer averaging is approved, require a densely planted mitigation plan along with an effective fence. · You may choose to revise plans for a proposal with buffer averaging that reduces the buffer only on the northwestern portion of the wetland, where it has previously been cleared and is not currently vegetated in either trees or saplings and shrubs. Revised plans with buffer averaging must include a compensatory wetland mitigation plan. Plans must graphically portray that portion of the wetland buffer that has been previously cleared and is not now vegetated in either forest or sapling trees and shrubs. Compensatory mitigation for the buffer reduction shall consist of three parts. The remaining area of buffer where the reduction in width is proposed must be enhanced with dense plantings of native trees and shrubs. A solid wood fence must be installed at the rear of the residential lots adjacent to the sensitive area tract containing the wetland and buffer. An equivalent area of additional undisturbed buffer must be set aside at some location around the wetland where it will enhance the functions of the wetland. If you choose to revise plans to meet the criteria above, note that this is in addition to the previous request to show the locations of proposed utilities in relation to the wetland and buffer. If you have any questions regarding review of wetlands please contact Laura Casey by phone at (206) 296-7291 or by email at laura.casey@metrokc.gov. MAIN FILE COPY MAIN FILE COPY • C, • • L01TY401 & LOIP0016 November 13, 2001 Page 2 .. The Land Use Services Division is ·requesting additional information and/or studies to complete the review of your project. See our letters dated September 26, 2001, October 2, 2001 and memo dated September 27, 2001. When submitting the requested information, include copies of the letters requesting information and retain copies for your records. Provide a cover letter, which lists how each item, was addressed. Any clarification or explanation of the submittal can also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division A 1TN: Karen Scharer, Planner II, Current Planning Section 900 Oaksdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 If the submittal is hand delivered, submit at the address above. Your application is on "hold" from the date of this notice, until the date you are advised that the additional information satisfies this request, or 14 days after the date the information has been provided. You will be notified if the Division determines that the information is insufficient. Please note that the supplemental information required after vesting of a complete application shall not affect the validity of such application. The deadline for the submittal of the information previously requested is January 2, 2002. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist, which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request, in writing, for consideration by this Department. Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If possible, please submit all of the information in one package. If you have any questions, regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-7114 or by e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov. arer Current P anning Section cc Kim Claussen, Planner III, Current Planning Section, LUSD Trishah Bull, Planner II, Current Planning Section Bruce Whittaker, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LU.SD Kris Langley, Supervisor, Traffic & Engineering, KCDOT Laura Casey, Senior Ecologist, Site Development Services, LUSD Larry West, Senior Geologist, Site Development Services, LUSD V Application File Howard Stansbury, U.S. Land Development Associates C/0 Centurian Development Services 22617 s" Drive SE, Bothell, WA 98021 . ... -•"' ., November 8, 2001 TO: Karen Scharer, Planner, Current Planning Section FM: Laura Casey, Senior Ecologist, Sensitive Areas Section RE: Evendell-Wetland Buffer Averaging Review (L01P0016 / L01TY401) Following our meeting with the Mike Romano, Centurion Development Services, and Tom Deming, Habitat Technologies, I presented the applicant's proposal for wetland buffer averaging to six other Senior Ecologists at DOES, all of whom evaluate permits for impacts to wetlands. The summary of their comments is as follows: • Buffer reduction, as part of a buffer averaging proposal is not acceptable in a forested buffer. • This proposal for buffer averaging does not meet the buffer averaging criteria, because it does not enhance the functions of the wetland. • Potentially acceptable to reduce the buffer through buffer averaging where the buffer has been previously cleared, although scientific literature shows that 25 -50 foot buffers are not very effective. • If buffer averaging is approved, require a densely planted mitigation plan along with an effective fence. I am willing to consider a buffer averaging proposal that reduces the buffer only on the northwestern portion of the wetland, where it has previously been cleared and is not currently vegetated in either trees or saplings and shrubs. The applicant must revise the buffer averaging proposal and compensatory wetland mitigation plan. It must graphically portray that portion of the wetland buffer that has been previously cleared and is not now vegetated in either forest or sapling trees and shrubs. Compensatory mitigation for the buffer reduction shall consist of three parts. The remaining area of buffer where the reduction in width is proposed must be enhanced with dense plantings of native trees and shrubs. A solid wood fence must be installed at the rear of the residential lots adjacent to the sensitive area tract containing the wetland and buffer. An equivalent area of additional undisturbed buffer must be set aside at some location around the wetland where it will enhance the functions of the wetland. -TO: Karen Scharer RE: Evendell, L01P0016 / L01TY401 November 8, 2001 Page 2 Please request that the applicant submit a revised proposal as described above. This request is in addition to my previous request to show the locations of proposed utilities in relation to the wetland and buffer. If you or the applicant's agents have any questions, I can be reached by phone at (206) 296-7291 or by email at laura.casey@metrokc.gov. Sincerely, Laura C. Casey, PWS Senior Ecologist Sensitive Areas Section Cc: Bruce Whittaker, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section Steve Bottheim, Supervising Engineer, Sensitive Areas Section Attn: Nick Gillen, Senior Ecologist Pesha Klein, Senior Ecologist Greg Poels, Senior Ecologist Betsy MacWhinney, Senior Ecologist Bill Kerschke, Senior Ecologist Jon Sloan, Senior Ecologist .. , r • , • ;· ) -'. Marilynn Carlson November 7, 2001 ~ th 13616 156 Ave se Renton, WA 98059 '"n\ ,.tr" -B P·'' ": 51 1 425-226-6178 home 425-376-7486 worli<, 1 11 ..i ~~ .c.u.u.t.s. Evendell Plat file # L01 TY401 & L01P0016 Applicant: Howard Stansbury U.S. Land Development Assoc. KCC 21a.06.1172 Dear Ms. Scharer, Following are my comments on this development: Runoff: When the 10 acres along 160th Ave se was developed for the existing dwelling, the water on that property was diverted off, at least in part, to those of us to the west. My neighbor behind me Don Milbrath had water in his pasture and I had water standing in my backyard and under my house. The gravel toad 137th St was damaged and still has erosion occur to it during heavy rains. I myself had to put in a french drain to remove the runoff to my front yard. I am NOT going to be able to take any more runoff. It appears that my land in from could already be sinking form too much water and my drainfield is also further down in my front yard. The water off this property to be developed also flows to the southwest through property where my horse is boarded. The land where my horse is has a drainage ditch through it, and the pasture along 160th already has deep standing water every winter. Twice my horse has become very ill because of floodwaters getting so high it ran into the barn. I do not want my horse to become ill again or pay unnecessary vet bills because of runoff from other's land. Stormwater detention ponds are a dismal failure. They take little of the runoff and fill up to the outlet pipe almost immediately. In addition with no fish, movement or chemicals they become a breeding ground for mosquitos. Adding chemicals is really not an option for the health of the neighborhood. Furthermore as with all man made systems, this drainage solution would wear out. Pipes become clogged and break and in a couple of decades or so it could become useless. Natural drainage, absorption and ground cover are the only permanent solutions to water problems. Exhibit No. __,_I a~---- ltem No. 4i )PCP tG, v-Lo[N J../0/ Received 3 ~ Ct,-~3, tl!Jblll!NJ lr~l!..IE ~(OJl?'lf King County Hearing Examiner .• .. ~ Environmental: Unfortunately with most all new developments they are not made environmentally sound. This can be seen with the developments west of us in Renton. The developers rape the land of all vegetation, take off the topsoil and make the whole development impervious surface. The amount of top soil that is put back is very little which means the surface water runs off in the winter and in the summer the water : use is increased. V'lith the lack of permeable surface the aquifers are also not being recharged. The trees and other vegetation give various benefits to the whole community, including air cleansing, wind buffers, O)(ygen production, surface water management, recharging aquifers, and of course beauty. Our neighborhoods in this area are full of vegetation. Developments with no vegetation buffers do not fit in our community. Traffic: In the 11 years I have lived on 156th Ave, the traffic has gone from a busy road to a freeway. Many many times we have complained to the county. {To no avail} We have thousands of cars a day as it is now; we can take no more, especially at 35mph. It is a very dangerous road and it is unfair to make one set of citizens' take the entire traffic load for four major areas. We have traffic from Fairwood, Issaquah, Maple Valley and the Highlands. Our community has told both Renton and King County that we need at least two more roads off our hill. They both have refused to do anything. For the safety of our neighborhood and those who pass through, we need alternate routes to escape off this hill. A natural disaster, or in these times terrorism, could cut off 156th and/or make Renton to the west impassable. As it stands now 156th is the only road to the south for the whole area, this is unacceptable. Before more developments are put into east Renton and our area, we need more roads. New developments should be required to have thru roads in them. Cul de sacs create traffic problems. The developments increase traffic and they should help share in the solution. If there are urban densities then an urban grid pattern of roads is needed, not dead-ends and cul de sacs. .upzone: This area east of Renton in King County is zoned R-4. All citizens are supposed to be treated the same. For too long developers, contractors, and 'special' individuals have been given extra rights. If all the other properties in the area as R-4 then this development should also be R-4 not upzoned to R-6. I am also wondering about the waste disposal. This area is on septic systems and the area was supposed to be off limits to any more septics. The development specs say nothing about sewer. If there is to be a sewer are we "~~going to be forced to pay for the profits of another developer? Suggestions for the Development Until separate roadways to the south are built no more development should occur. If we are forced to accept the development, the following should be the minimum requirements: 1} R-4 not R-6 2} A perimeter of natural vegetation at least 20 ft wide should surround the development except for ingress and egress. 3} Leaving the total amount of depth of topsoil as it is now on the property, with the exception of the dwelling foundation. 4} If there are sewers going to the property the developer pays for the whole cost unless another property owner wants to connect. Sincerely, .v"./ -~~- Marilynn Carlson Cc Ron Sims LI . . . Marilynn E. Carlson 13616156th Ave. SE Renton. WA 96059 ~\LE /i~, 'v'' ~,,, {'<, DM «> ·v) · co (',J -t:7 NU\/ ~) ~4~0tlo?~ /J11-µ hteD :5c._4a~ 900 O::tk.esda~/rJ,JF;;.5v..J ·~t~ lu4--~ ~~~.Ji --- ·~e.Cl'S'S I 'I. '2. 'I.~ H : ! i g i t \ ! n \ 1 1 i\ ; i i i ! . 1 \! Hdi!liH:llnHH\:H!lHn\h: iH!ih th!l::i!!H1HHi! I -..:;;:=~·-· .·· --~ .. . .......... ' Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning this application. File No's: L01TY40I & LOIPOOI6 -Evendell Rezone & Plat Nam~/cpJJ (};dSJv Address: / ?/al fo ('# -.;:£r def. 5£. ~~ ~· 7d07 Telephone No.: fis:/2l-0t78 </l~-37G -r!Bb • ' h ......_&_, Scharer, Karen From: Sent: To: Subject: Fred Jaques[SMTP:fredjaques@home.com] Thursday, November 01, 2001 5:03 PM karen.scharer@metrokc.gov L01TY401 & L01P0016-Evendell Rezone & Plat We areagainst the subject Evendell rezone for the following reasons: 1. We came to live in King County because of the low population density and because KC laws prevented high density tract housing. This project builds 75 houses, each on 0.13 acre. This is incredibly dense. This may be OK for Renton, but not for King County. The quality of life will decrease and the area will completely lose the rural lifestyleit had.We don't see why regulations should be changed for the gain of some private company when it affects so many people. 2. What are the plans for the handling of sewage? Obviously, septic tanks would not work for this kind of housing density. Will the city of Renton agree to connect to its sewer system? Will Renton annex this area? Does the Renton city council know about the project? 3. The traffic on SE 128th Street is already horrible, as bad as an Interstate. Thereare already huge developments started on SE 128th Street, which is sure to exacerbate the problem. The added 75 homes would cause an unacceptable congestion. The alternative road is Maple Valley road, which is already congested. 4. This area is wet land. State law does not allow such a land to be developed. 5. This dense and cheap tract housing will bring more crime and trash along the road. We never see any police officer patrolling the area. Please send us notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning this application. Please send me a 17 "x 22" copy of the plat, since what you had at the proposed location was unreadable. Or else you could also put the plat onyourWeb site. Thank you Fred and Helga Jaques 13114, 158th.AvenueSE Renton, Wash. 98059 Page 1 Exhibit No. __._I...,]'----- Item No. i.,,pt/Jcei/ln t-J..J)r,YA/01 Received 3 ·(q ~n '> King County Hearing Examiner ,/ //-S-Qj I .. Renton city council know about the project? 3. The traffic on SE 128th Street is already horrible, as bad as an Interstate. Thereare already huge developments started on SE 128th Street, which is sure to exacerbate the problem. The added 75 homes would cause an unacceptable congestion. The alternative road is Maple Valley road, which is already congested. 4. This area is wet land. State law does not allow such a land to be developed. 5. This dense and cheap tract housing will bring more crime and trash along the road. We never see any police officer patrolling the area. Please send us notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning this application. Please send me a 17 " x 22" copy of the plat, since what you had at the proposed location was unreadable. Or else you could also put the plat onyourWeb site. Thank you Fred and Helga Jaques 13114, 158 th. Avenue SE Renton, Wash. 98059 Page 2 r • Ii Malone, Patricia From: Sent: To: Scharer, Karen Thursday, October 04, 2001 1 :27 PM Malone, Patricia Subject: FW: Regarding: L01TY401 and L01P0016 Please add to interested party list. Thanks From: sent: EXT-High, Gwen A[SMTP:gwen.a.high@boeing.com] Thursday, October 04, 200112:56 PM To: 'Scharer, Karen' Subject: RE: Regarding: L01TY401 and L01P0016 Hello Again! Thank you for such a speedy reply! Let me see ... as the address I gave below is incomplete, here is the full address: Victor and Gwendolyn High 13405 158th Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Please add us to the interested parties list. Your reference to comparable applications is excellent and I will follow your suggestion to review these reports ASAP. I will also arrange to meet with Mr. Ware to review the file as it exists. You have been most helpful! Thank you very much! g -----Original Message----- From: Scharer, Karen (mailto:Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV) Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 12:39 PM To: 'EXT-High, Gwen A' Subject: RE: Regarding: L01TY401 and L01P0016 First we should have your address so that we can add you to our list of interested parties. We have asked the applicant to provide additional information regarding traffic, wetlands, etc .. After he submits & we review, we will issue a threshold determination and then we schedule a public hearing. ODES issues a report & recommendation 2 weeks before the hearing. We are at the beginning of the process & don't have answers to all your questions at this time. If you have specific concerns, please describe so that we can address them in our review. If you wish to review the file, please make an appointment with Robert Ware at 206-296-664 7. You may wish to look at the King County examiner's decision on LOO TY 402 at their web site & our file LOOTY 402 &'..,(' 1 \1 LOOP0009 for a similar rezone & plat west of 156th Ave. SE. _ Y After you have a chance to review these files -you may have a better understanding & more specific questions. Page 1 MAIN FILE COPY '. ' Karen J. Scharer Current Planning Section Land Use Services Division Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Phone 206-296-7114 Fax 206-296-7051 Mailstop: OAK-DE-0100 From: EXT-High, Gwen A(SMTP:gwen.a.high@boeing.com] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 200112:01 PM To: 'karen.scharer@metrokc.gov' Subject: Regarding: L01TY401 and L01P0016 Hello! .... I noticed a brand new Proposed Land Use sign at the end of my deadend street last night. It concerns the application for the Rezone and Formal Plat for the 13 acres at the south end of 158th Ave S. E. We live at 13405 158th Ave S.E. and are very interested to become more educated on the details of this application. I am most interested in the traffic and environmental implications of the rezoning. In addition, my neighbors are quite concerned with the infrastructural impacts to the neighborhood, for instance those related to possible sewer installation. I also would like to understand to specifics of the changes in regulations between a zoning of R-4 and R-6. If possible, it would also be appreciated if I could get a legible copy of the map provided on the back of the Notice of Application. When may we meet? I generally work from 6:30am to 3:00pm, but my schedule is quite flexible. I also work in the Washington Technical Center across the parking lot from your building. Please let me know what would work for you. Thank you for your assistance! gwendolyn Gwendolyn High Application Developer > 425.393.0092 > Page 2 • ~ ' . King County Depat11nent of Devclop1ncnt and Envirmunental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 October 2, 2001 Howard Stansbury U.S. Land Development Associates C/0 Centurian Development Services 22617 81h Drive SE Bothell, WA 98021 RE: Notice of Request for Additional Information or Studies Application No. L01 P0016 -Evendell Date Filed: July 6, 2001 Date of Complete Application: September 20, 2001 Dear Mr. Stansbury: The purpose of this letter is to notify you pursuant to King County Code Title 20, that the Land Use Services Division is requesting additional information and/or studies to complete the review of your project. In addition to the previous Notice of Request for Additional Information or Studies (dated September 26, 2001 ). the following information is required: Wetland impacts have been evaluated by ODES Senior Ecologist, Laura Casey, see memo dated September 27, 2001. Please address the concerns and make revisions to the plans as required. In addition to the previous request for additional information, provide calculations, as needed, for disturbance of wetland and wetland buffer area that would occur as a result of road improvements, per technical staff comments in the September 26, 2001 Screening Transmittal. For your convenience, a copy of the memo from Laura Casey and the previous Screening Transmittal are attached. When submitting the requested information, include a copy of this letter and retain a copy for your records. Provide a cover Jetter, which lists how each item, was addressed. Any clarification or explanation of the submittal can also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN: Karen Scharer, Planner 11, Current Planning Section 900 Oaksdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 MAIN FILE COPY If the submittal is hand delivered, submit at the address above. Your application is on "hold" from the date of this notice, until the date you are advised that the additional information satisfies this request, or 14 days after the date the information has been provided. You will be notified if the Division determines that the information is insufficient. Please note that the supplemental information required after vesting of a complete application shall not affect the validity of such application. The deadline for the submittal of the information previously requested and the additional wetland information references is January 2, 2002. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist, which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request, in writing, for consideration by this Department. Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If possible, please submit all of the information in one package. If you have any questions, regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-6758 or Karen Scharer at (206) 296-7114. Sincerely, Tn ah Bull, Planner II Current Planning Section Cc: Mike Romano, Centurion Development Services Kim Claussen, Planner Ill, Current Planning Section, LUSD Bruce Whittaker, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Aileen McManus, Senior Engineer, Traffic & Engineering, KCDOT Laura Casey, Senior Ecologist, Site Development Services, LUSD Larry West, Senior Geologist, Site Development Services, LUSD Application File .. Kfng County Depart1nent of Development and Envirmunental Services 900 0.ikcsda!e Avenue SouthWl'St Renton, \VA 98055-1219 September 27, 2001 I TO: Karen Scharer, Planner, Current Planning Section /!. 11.ll, Trishah Bull, Planner, Current Planning Section ~ . L //.I/ ; /t}\f;[tti-I Laura Casey, Senior Ecologist, Site Development Services ··7 VJ, / , FM: RE: Plat of Evendell -Wetland Review (L01 P0016 / L01 TY 401) I have reviewed the following file documents: Preliminary Plat, dated May 29, 2001, by Centurion Development Services; Nyblom/Mair Topography, dated February 13, 2001, by Dryco Surveying, Inc.; Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation. and Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Plan, dated May 15, 2001, by Habitat Technologies; and Preliminary Technical Information Report, dated June 15, 2001, by Hazous Engineering. I reviewed these documents for conformance with the King County Sensitive Areas Code (21A.24) and associated rules, especially on buffer averaging (21A-24-016). I investigated the site on September 24, 2001. The site contains a Class 2 partially forested wetland on the northeast portion of the property. The northern and western portion of the wetland has been cleared in the past, and contains some slash piles and downed wood along with sapling trees, shrubs and areas of emergent vegetation. The remainder of the wetland consists of forest with shrub understory. The buffer has similarly been previously cleared in the northwestern portion of the wetland. The southern and eastern portions of the buffer are forested. Construction of SE 1361h Street for access to this property would fill 200 square feet of wetland and encroach on about 4,600 square feet of buffer. This impact could potentially be minimized by reducing the width of the required road improvements and by using construction techniques to limit fill into the wetland. Mitigation for this wetland and buffer alteration is proposed as enhancing the approximately 4000 square feet of degraded wetland, and the adjacent degraded buffer, with additional native vegetation. In the forested area east of the wetland, 5,500 square feet of additional buffer would also be provided. This wetland and buffer alteration and mitigation can be approved under KCC 21A.24.330N. The project also proposes to reduce the wetland buffer along the western side of the wetland from the 50-foot Code minimum to 32.5 feet, in order to create building lots. Mitigation is proposed as addition of 10,000 square feet of additional buffer east of the wetland, and construction of fencing between the buffer and the adjacent lots. This is not an "unavoidable intrusion" into the buffer, as stated in the Wetland Report. It can easily be avoided by redrawing the lot boundaries to provide the minimum 50-foot buffer. Buffer averaging can only be permitted when it provides "additional protection to TO: Karen Scharer, T~ h Bull RE: L01TY401 / L01:•6 September 27, 2001 Page 2 ' wetlands or enhances their functions" (KCC 21A24.320B and rule 21A-24-016). The proposed buffer reduction is adjacent to new small residential lots, where intrusion from humans and their pets will most often occur. The proposed additional buffer is located on the northeast side of the wetland, away from most human intrusion and in an area not easily used for any other plat purpose. Reducing the buffer adjacent to the area of increased human intrusion in return for increasing the buffer where there will be limited h.uman intrusion does not provide additional protection to the wetland. Therefore, buffer averaging as proposed cannot be approved, and the plat must be redrawn to show the minimum 50-foot buffer along the western side of the wetland. Wetland hydrology must also be prote.cted through review of the plat. The stormwater system must be designed to match the pre-development hydrology of the wetland. This can be a condition of plat approval. The location of proposed utilities in relation to the wetland and buffer must be shown. Utility installation may result in removal of trees from the wetland or buffer, and/or excavation in these areas. These wetland alterations must be reviewed for conformance with the Sensitive Areas Code. Please request that the applicant revise the project and provide the additional information noted above. If you have any questions regarding my comments, please give me a call at (206) 296-7291 or send email to laura.casey@metrokc.gov. Cc: Bruce Whittaker, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section Randy Sandin, Supervising Engineer, Site Development Services ,· ,. :· ·(®·· . King ¢o"ui1ty. Deparunent of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Please provide ten (10) copies of the following, unless otherwise noted. Drainage: oLevel I Analysis: Please evaluate the downstream drainage complaints and categorize them as to severity per Core Requirement 2 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. Indicate in the analysis how the proposal mitigates for these problems per Core 2. Apparently, complaint #97-031 B(Gregg) is still a problem even though a new culvert was instaJJed by King County. The remaining drainage complaints should also be evaluated per Core 2. oShow the existing onsite subbasins on the conceptual drainage plan. · oA drainage diversion adjustment is required for the proposed shift in post-developed basins. oProvide a copy of a drainage easement for the proposed conveyance from the west portion of the site to l 56tl' Ave SE. If an easement does not exist, provide a Jetter of intent from the property owner to execute an easement. Roads: Traffic Impact Analysis: oProvide AM Peak hour volumes and LOS analysis. o The opening of SE. l 36'h St. wiJJ alJow other neighborhood trips to use the SE 136th St. route to access onto 156'" Ave SE. Please reevaluate traffic volumes in the area to determine the future volumes on SE 136th St. between 156'" Ave SE and I 60'h Ave SE. The existing TIA did not account for existing and future traffic using this route. olt appears that 158'" Ave SE as it enters the site could serve more than JOO Jots if the rezone is approved. You would assume the undeveloped parcels that will be served by l 58'h Ave SE would also be rezoned to R6. They do not have access to 156th Ave SE that can meet King County Road Standards for intersection spacing. Therefore a second fulJ access should be provided to the east to l 60'h Ave SE. Other: 0 SE J 36'h St. will function as a neighborhood collector street. King County Road Standards does not allow for a reduction in right of way dedication for a neighborhood collector street. Therefore 26 feet ofrighf of way is required throughout the plat frontage on SE 136th St. oProvide a sight distance analysis for the access onto 160th Ave SE. oProvide a preliminary engineering plan for frontage improvements along SE 1361h ST and l 60'h A VE SE. The improvement plan should include urban neighborhood collector standards on the plat's frontage and a centerline profile. oDirect access to a neighborhood collector by driveways and joint use driveways are not allowed. Revise access for lots 54, 55, and 29. oDocument that the existing house wilJ comply with setback and parking requirements ofKCC 21.A. .scr LF/PlatSCR.Sub 2/24/98 clc ' .-. Whittaker, Bruce From: Scharer, Karen Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 2:03 PM Casey, Laura To: Cc: Subject: Whittaker, Bruce; Sandin, Randy; Bull, Trishah; McManus, Aileen RE: Evendell Wetland Review L01TY401 / L01P0016 Trish will be forwarding your comments for response by the applicant. They have a series of issues to consider in redesigning. I think that we should probably wait for Mike's response to our comments & then set a time to meet. From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: casey, Laura Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:07 PM Scharer, Karen; Bull, Trishah Whittaker, Bruce; Sandin, Randy Evendell Wetland Review L01TY401 / L01P0016 Attached is a memo summarizing my review of the preliminary plat of Evendell. Please note that I am not approving the buffer averaging proposal, and therefore the plat must be redrawn. I would like to discuss the road requirements for SE 136th Street to see how the wetland fill could be minimized or eliminated. Please let me know when a meeting is scheduled on this project. «File: L01 P0016-92701.doc» Page 1 King County Department ofDevelop1nent and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Souihwcsl Renton, WA 98055-1219 September 26, 2001 Howard Stansbury U.S. Land Development Associates C/0 Centurian Development Services 22617 81h Drive SE Bothell, WA 98021 RE: Notice of Request for Additional Information or Studies Application No. L01P0016-Evendell Date Filed: July 6, 2001 Date of Complete Application: September 20, 2001 Dear Mr. Stansbury: ' The purpose of this letter is to notify you pursuant to King County Code Title 20, that the [and Use Services Division is requesting additional information and/or studies to complete the review of your project. The information is described on the enclosed plat screening transmittal. When submitting the requested information, include a copy of the plat screening transmittal and retain a copy for your records. Provide a cover letter, which lists how each item, was addressed. Any clarification or explanation of the submittal can also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: I King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division A TIN: Karen Scharer, Planner 11, Current Planning Section 900 Oaksdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 If the submittal is hand delivered, submit at the address above. Your application is on "hold" from the date of this notice, until the date you are advised that the additional information satisfies this request, or 14 days after the date the information has been provided. You will be notified if the Division determines that the information is insufficient. Please note that the supplemental information required a{ter vesting of a complete application shall not affect the validity of such application. The deadline for the submittal of the necessary information is December 26, 2001. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist. which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request, in writing, for consideration by this Department. Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. MAIN FILE COPY I I If possible, please submit all of the information in one package. If you have any questions, regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-6758 or Karen Scharer at (206) 296-7114. Sincerely, Tn ah Bull, Planner II Current Planning Section Cc Kim Claussen, Planner Ill, Current Planning Section, LUSD Bruce Whittaker, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Aileen McManus, Senior Engineer, Traffic & Engineering, KCDOT Laura Casey, Senior Ecologist, Site Development Services, LUSD tarry West, Senior Geologist, Site Development Services, LUSD Application File _ .... -~ . ·., ' ti Ir~\ ·,. ~ King County Department of Development 'Plat Screening Transmittal ' Preliminary Plat Application of Evendell LUSD File No. L01P0016 and Environmema! Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Date of Information Request: September 26, 2001 Deadline for Submittal of Information: December 26, 2001 Please provide ten (I 0) copies of the following, unless otherwise noted. Drainage: •Level 1 Analysis: Please evaluate the downstream drainage complaints and categorize them as to severity per Core Requirement 2 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. Indicate in the analysis how the proposal mitigates for these problems per Core 2. Apparently, complaint #97-0318(Gregg) is still a problem even though a new culve1i was installed by King County. The remaining drainage complaints should also be evaluated per Core 2. •Show the existing onsite subbasins on the conceptual drainage plan. •A drainage diversion adjustment is required for the proposed shift in post-developed basins. •Provide a copy of a drainage easement for the proposed conveyance from the west portion of the site to 156'" Ave SE. If an easement does not exist, provide a letter of intent from the property owner to execute an easement. Roads: Traffic Impact Analysis: •Provide AM Peak hour volumes and LOS analysis. •The opening of SE 136'h St. will allow other neighborhood trips to use the SE 136°' St. route to access onto 156'" Ave SE. Please reevaluate traffic volumes in the area to determine the future volumes on SE 136'" St. between 156'" Ave SE and 160'" Ave SE. The existing TIA did not account for existing and future traffic using this route. •It appears that 158'" Ave SE as it enters the site could serve more than 100 lots if the rezone is approved. You would assume the undeveloped parcels that will be served by 158"' Ave SE would also be rezoned to R6. They do not have access to 156'" Ave SE that can meet King County Road Standards for intersection spacing. Therefore a second full access should be provided to the east to 16011t Ave SE. Other: •SE 136'" St. will function as a neighborhood collector street. King County Road Standards Joes not allow for a reduction in right of way dedication for a neighborhood collector street. Therefore 26 feet of right of way is required throughout the plat frontage on SE 136'" St. •Provide a sight distance analysis for the access onto 160'" Ave SE. •Provide a preliminary engineering plan for frontage improvements along SE 136'h ST and 160'" AVE SE. The improvement plan should include urban neighborhood collector standards on the plat's frontage and a centerline profile. • •Direct access to a neighborhood collector by driveways and joint use driveways are not allowed. Revise access for lots 54, 55, and 29. •Document that the existing house will comply with setback and parking requirements ofKCC 21.A . . scr LF/PlatSCR.Sub 2/24/98 clc , ..... .. Evendell LO 1 POO 16 Screening Comments Bruce Whittaker 9/11/2001 Level 1 Analysis: Please evaluate the downstream drainage complaints and categorize them as to severity per Core Requirement 2 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. Indicate in the analysis how the proposal mitigates for these problems per Core 2. Apparantly, complaint #97-0318(Gregg) is still a problem eventhough a new culvert was installed by King County. The remaining drainage complaints should also be evaluated per Core 2. Show the existing onsite subasins on the conceptual drainage plan. A drainage diversion adjustment is required for the proposed shift in post-developed basins. Provide a copy of a drainage easement for the proposed conveyance from the west portion of the site to 1561h Ave SE. !fan easement does not exist, provide a letter of intent from the property owner to execute an easement. .. ' , .> KING COUNTY DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION Road Services Division Traffic Engineering Section To: Trishah Bull, LUSD, DDES Fm: Aileen McManus, Traffic Engineering, KCDOT Re: Evendell, LO] TY40I & LOJP0016, Traffic Screening Comments Please include the following in the screening letter for Evendell: Traffic Impact Analysis: !) Provide AM Peak hour volumes and LOS analysis. 2) The opening of SE 1361h St. will allow other neighborhood trips to use the SE 1361h St. route to access onto 1561h Ave SE. Please reevaluate traffic volumes in the area to determine the future volumes on SE 1361h St. between 1561hAve SE and 1601h Ave SE. The existing TIA did not account for existing and future traffic using this route. 3) It appears that 1581h Ave SE as it enters the site could serve more than 100 Jots if the rezone is approved. You would assume the undeveloped parcels that will be served by 158 1h Ave SE would also be rezoned to R6. They do not have access to 1561h Ave SE that can meet King County Road Standards for intersection spacing. Therefore a second full access should be provided to the east to 1601h Ave SE. Other: 4) SE 136 1h St. will function as a neighborhood collector street. King County Road Standards does not allow for a reduction in right of way dedication for a neighborhood collector street. Therefore 26 feet of right of way is required throughout the plat frontage on SE 1361h St. 5) Provide a sight distance analysis for the access onto 160 1h Ave SE. 6) Provide a preliminary engineering plan for froniage improvements along SE 1361h St. and 160 1h Ave SE. The improvement plan should include urban neighborhood collector standards on the plat's frontage an<! a·centerline profile. (Bruce may want to rewrite this). King County Department of Developn1ent and Environ1nental Services 900 Oakesd.:1le Avenue Southwest Renton, WA D8055-1219 September 21, 200 I Howard Stansbury U.S. Land Development Associates C/0 Centurian Development Services 22617 gth Drive SE Bothell, WA 98021 RE: Notice of Complete Application for Application Time Periods Application Nos. L01TY401 & L01P0016 Proposed Rezone & Subdivision of Evendell Date Filed: July 6, 2001 (incomplete notification August 3, 2001) Dear Mr. Stansbury: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that on September 20, 2001 (upon review of the additional information submitted) the Land Use Services Division determined that the above-referenced application is complete under current requirements for a complete application. This initial determination is intended only for the purpose of applying the time periods for permit processing specified in King County Code 19A and 20. Supplemental information may be requested by the Division, as necessary, for the continued review of your application. Our goal is to process your application within 120 days. However, the complexity and level of analysis required to review your project and available staff resources will affect the actual review time. The timeline can also be impacted by one or more of the following: • any request made by the Division for additional information • changes or revisions requested by the applicant • mutually-agreed-upon requests to stop the time clock • preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement • failure to post the property • resolution of land use decisions appeals If you have any questions about your application or the posting requirements, please contact me at (206) 296-7114 or by e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov. Sincerely, '""'---'&w ~ ~>4~ K en Scharer, Planner JI Current Planning Section, LUSD cc: Mike Romano, Centurion Development Services Kim Claussen, Planner III, Current Planning Section, LUSD Bruce Whittaker, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Trishah Bull, Planner II, Current Planning Section, LUSD Application File Letter.frm/NCA-ATP.ltr 9/12/97 mh -. . SEP-20-2001 15:16 CITY OF RENTON PBPW 425 430 7241 P.01/02 ,. .:. ') -~ ,-, .. TO: Phone: ®Dr® ®0 OO@ODU®OO PLANNING/BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Administration -Fifth Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Karen Scharer, Planner II (206) 296-7114 '\i / / ~ \))\fODllo Date: 09/20/01 FROIVI: Gregg Zimmerman P/B/PW Administrator Fax Phone: ( ) Phone: (425) 430-7311 Fax Phone: (425) 430-7241 ~ SUBJECT: Comments REMARKS: ~ Original to 0 Urgent be mailed I Number of pages includlng cover sheet 2 0 Reply ASAP O Please C For your Comment review I 055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 .a:,,. TOTAL P.02 ' I ', SEP-20-2001 15:15 CITY OF RENTON PBPW 425 430 7241 P.02/02 ·fR <C.11.' Il. "'St ~ .fr'. ~l~ .n. <LP 1 ~ Je:ssc Tonner, Mayor Planning/Build.ublic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator September 20, 200 I Ms. Karen Scharer Current Planning Section, LUSD King County Depanmcnt of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EVENDELL Dear Ms. Scharer: Thank you for the oppol1Unity of reviewing the proposed preliminary plat. It is my understanding that a sewer availability certificate for the plat has been issued by the City of Renton. The proposed plat is within the City of Renton's potential annexation area, and also is within Fire District #25. The City of Renton has a contract with Fire District #25 to provide fire protection and emergency services within this area .. I have attached comments from the City of Renton Fire Department. Jn addition, the City requests that City of Renton street design standards he applie!l to this project, including street width, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and light standard requirements, and also that half-street improvements be installed along adjacent right-of-way frontages along Southeast 1361h Street and 160'' Avenue Southeast. ' Thank you. Sincerely, '- !d~:ttrrnZ~!~~ Planning/Building/Public Works Qepamnent ":: Neil Watt.5 Lys Hornsby S1'nd11 Meyer Corey ThomBS I 055 South Grady Way• Renton, Washington 98055 """ .. TOTAL P.02 ' . . Jess~ Tanner, Mayor September 20, 200 I Ms. Karen Scharer Current Planning Section, LUSD fa ij@ 0 lb,@OlP@@Oi?? <CIT1r~ OJF JRJEN1r<ON PlanninglBuilding/Public Works Department v, ... '.·:Gregg Zi_mmerap.an P.E., Administrator ?OOJ s,-., 25 Pr; 3: 08 ICC.LJ.O.E.S. King County Department of Developmenfand Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EVENDELL Dear. Ms. Scharer: Thank you for the opportunity of reviewing the proposed preliminary plat. It is my understanding that a sewer availability certificate for the plat has been issued by the City of Renton. The proposed plat is within the City of Renton's potential annexation area, and also is within Fire District #25. The City of Renton has a contract with Fire District #25 to provide fire protection and emergency services within this area. I have attached comments from the City of Renton Fire Department. In addition, the City requests that C,ity of Renton street design standards be applied to this project, including street width, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and light standard requirements, and also that half-street improvements be installed along adjacent right-of-way frontages along Southeast 1361h Street and 1601h Avenue Southeast. Thank you. Sincerely, ' ~1:lirm7.~!~~ Planning/Building/Public Works Department cc: Neil Watts Lys Hornsby Sandra Meyer Corey Thomas 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 @ This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post con~umer MAIN FILE COP. ~\$) CIT'JI'Y (())JF IRJEN'JI'ON "~{I' ~ Planning/Building/Public Works 1055 South Grady Way -Renton Washington 98055 • ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED @ This paper contains 50% recycled paper, 20% post-consumer =- ! .,.:,. \ C; V, J' ~--- Ms Karen Scharer Current Planning Section, LUSD K.C. Dept. of Devel. & Environ. Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA 98055-1219 -• - . ---· -- • \ • 1 \ '\ • \ . • \I . . . 1·· . . . \ . \ 1· I ,\ul n ,I m,\, .,\,inn 11,Un; ll,b\,\,, ,lnH, I ; ,,. --" ------- I ISSUED BY 0 'fRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY K.C. D.D.E.S. GUARANTEE A l...ANDAMERICA COMPANY GUARANTEE NUMBER Mlb-0002lbl SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE LIMITS OF LIABILITY AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF THIS GUARANTEE, TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation, herein called the Company GUARANTEES the Assured named in Schedule A against actual monetary loss or damage not exceeding the liability amount stated in Schedule A which the Assured_ shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its du]y authorized officers, the Guarantee to become valid when countersigned on Schedule A by an authorized officer or agent of the Company. Attest: CLTAGuarantee Face Page (Rev.12/15/95) Form 1025-1 OA Secretary TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By: ORIGINAL Valid only if Schedule A and Cover are attached Prepared for: I ' Transnation A l..ANDAMERICA COMPANY TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 14450 NE 29TH PLACE SUITE 200 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98007-9926 CENTERIOR DEVELOPMENT 22617 8TH DRIVE SE BOTHELL, WA 98021 ATTN: MIKE ROMANO 2/1 Order Number: Seller: Second Commitment Order Summary 870890 Buyer/ Borrower: Your Reference No.: Loan Number: Thank you for placing this order with Transnation Title Insurance. If you need assistance on this file, please contact: John W. Jones (425) 646-8589 johnjones@landam.com Mark S. Niklason (425) 646-8592 mniklason@landam.com Randy McCrory (425) 646-8590 rmccrory@landam.com J. Jay Pugh (425) 646-8591 jaypugh@landam.com 1-800-441-7701 Fax: ( 425) 646-8593 File No.: 870890 8 Transnation RE: SECOND COMMITMENT SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE LIMITS OF LIABILITY AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HERETO ANNEXED AND MADE A PART OF THIS GUARANTEE, AND SUBJECT TO THE FURTHER EXCLUSION AND LIMITATION THAT NO GUARANTEE IS GIVEN NOR LIABILITY ASSUMED WITH RESPECT TO THE IDENTITY OF ANY PARTY NAMED OR REFERRED TO IN SCHEDULE A OR WITH RESPECT TO THE VALIDITY, LEGAL EFFECT OR PRIORITY OF ANY MATTER SHOWN THEREIN. TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation herein called the Company, GUARANTEES CENTERIOR DEVELOPMENT the Assured named in Schedule A against actual monetary loss or damage not exceeding the liability amount stated in Schedule A which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. DATED: June 25, 2001 at 8:00 am Transnation Title Insurance Company By_::::iz--=---~-~-~=-- Authorized Signature Subdivision Guarantee TQ900WA (5/99) Page 1 of 8 Order No. Customer No. 870890 1. Name of Assured: I CENTERIOR DEVELOPMENT 2. Date of Guarantee: June 25, 2001 at 8:00 am SCHEDULE A Liability: Charge: Tax: Total: The assurances referred to on the face page hereof are: ' File No.: 870890 $200.00 $200.00 $17.60 $217.60 That according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matters affecting title to the following described land: As fully set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part thereof. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in: ROBERT A. MAIR AND CLYDERAE MAIR, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS TO PARCEL A; AND DAVID A. NYBLOM AND DEBRA L. ALBISO, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS TO PARCEL B subject to the Exceptions shown below, which are not necessarily shown in order of their priority. Page 2 of 8 Subdivision Guarantee I f SCHEDULE A -Continued File No.: 870890 EXCEPTIONS: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies or assessments on land or by the public records. 2. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown by the public records. 3. Title to any property beyond the lines of the land expressly described herein, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways on which said land abuts, or the right to maintain vaults, tunnels, ramps or any other structure or improvement; or any rights or easements therein unless such property rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in the land described herein. 4. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES and SERVICE CHARGES, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No.: ~ .ll.i.L!.!:9 2001 $2,220.89 142305-9022-07 fil.i.g $0.00 Total amount due, not including interest and penalty: Levy Code: Assessed Value Land: Assessed Value Improvements: (Covers Parcel A) 4350 $81,000.00 $91,000.00 Balance $2,220.89 $2,220.89 5. The 2001 County Tax Roll discloses that a mobile home is situate on the land herein described and is being taxed under personal property taxes as Account Number 39922612. Inquiry must be made for correct payment amount and procedure. (Covers Parcel A) Page 3 of8 Subdivision Guarantee I t SCHEDULE A -Continued File No.: 870890 6. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES and SERVICE CHARGES, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No.: )'.gM 2001 fillwl $6,806.55 142305-9009-04 ew!I $3,403.28 Balance $3,403.27 Total amount due, not including interest and penalty: $3,403.27 Levy Code: Assessed Value Land: Assessed Value Improvements: (Covers Parcel B) 6870 $208,000.00 $301,000.00 7. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDING NO.: KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 90, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION WATER AND SEWER MAINS NORTHERLY 30 FEET OF PARCEL B 7507170567 8. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDING NO.: KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 90 WATER AND SEWER MAINS WITH NECESSARY APPURTENANCES NORTHERLY 30 FEET OF PARCEL A 7507170570 9. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDING NO.: (Covers Parcel B) PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION ONE OR MORE ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION LINES AS CONSTRUCTED OR TO BE CONSTRUCTED, EXTENDED OR RELOCATED 9502230476 10. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon the land herein described as established in Volume 31, of Commissioner's Records, Page 415. (Covers Parcel B) Page 4 of8 Subdivision Guarantee I ' SCHEDULE A -Continued File No.: 870890 11. ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS OR OTHER SERVITUDES, IF ANY, DISCLOSED BY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9508099008. RIGHTS OR BENEFITS, IF ANY, WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY THE RECORDED DOCUMENT(S) ABOVE AFFECTING LAND OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARY DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A. (Covers Parcel B) 12. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ADDRESS: LOAN NO.: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: (Covers Parcel B) DAVID A. NYBLOM AND DEBRA L. ALBISO, HUSBAND AND WIFE NORTHWEST FINANCIAL CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION FIRST SAVINGS BANK OF WASHINGTON P.O. BOX 907, WALLA WALLA, WA 99362 $203,150.00 JULY 21, 1995 AUGUST 1, 1995 9508010201 Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owed by contacting the appropriate lender/agency/individual. Page 5 of8 Subdivision Guarantee I t SCHEDULE A -Continued File No.: 870890 13. DEED OF TRUST SECURING A LINE OF CREDIT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ADDRESS: LOAN NO.: AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: DAVID A. NYBLOM AND DEBRA L. ALBISO, HUSBAND AND WIFE CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY KING COUNTY CREDIT UNION 801 SECOND AVENUE, SUITE 100, SEATTLE, WA 98104-1510 $40,000.00 SEPTEMBER 12, 1997 SEPTEMBER 19, 1997 9709190341 NOTE: CAUTION SHOULD BE EXERCISED TO ENSURE THAT A RECONVEYANCE WILL BE OBTAINED. (Covers Parcel B) Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owed by contacting the appropriate lender/agency/individual. 14. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ADDRESS: LOAN NO.: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: (Covers Parcel A and other property) ROBERT A. MAIR AND CLYDERAE MAIR, HUSBAND AND WIFE FIDELITY MORTGAGE TRUSTEE SERVICE, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION IMC MORTGAGE COMPANY D/B/A COREWEST MORTGAGE COMPANY $122,000.00 JULY 18, 1997 JULY 31, 1997 9707311685 Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owed by contacting the appropriate lender/agency/individual. Note 1: The liability amount shown on Schedule A herein is a minimum because no specific liability amount was requested at the time the application for title insurance was made. Please contact your Title Officer if a greater liability amount is required, for which an additional fee will be charged. Page 6 of8 Subdivision Guarantee t ' SCHEDULE A -Continued File No.: 870890 Note 2: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WITHIN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT. PTNS OF NW 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC 14 TWN 23 N RNG 5 E BRP/erl ENCLOSURES: Sketch Vesting deed Recorded encumbrances Page 7 of8 Subdivision Guarantee ' t EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH V2 OF THE NORTH V2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M., LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 156'" AVENUE S.E. AS DEEDED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 1094243; TOGETHER WITH A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE NORTH 15 FEET OF THE WEST 187 FEET (AS MEASURED FROM THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY) OF LOT 2 OF SHORT PLAT NO. 878133, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8002250639, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; ALSO TOGETHER WITH A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE SOUTH 15 FEET OF THE EAST 22 FEET OF THE WEST 199 FEET, AS MEASURED FROM THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 156'" AVENUE S.E., OF THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 1/i OF THE NORTH Y2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 156'" AVENUE S.E.; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: THE EAST 1/i OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M.; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID EAST V2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 14 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID EAST V2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 25°21' EAST 523.99 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID EAST V2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4; THENCE NORTH 88°07'58" WEST 653.61 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST V2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4; THENCE SOUTH 00°27'05" WEST 525.82 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID EAST 1/i OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 'I•; THENCE SOUTH 88°17'35" EAST 653.84 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID EAST V2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 2680904; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. u• • : N . i • • • ! . • • : : I, I; t • • ; • I }- ·i .. • ' .. t ..... ., . .,. 7a.:J.JI(,, "A; t 1308( 3 ' ' j :1 ,, " B ,.,-1.r,, .. r J .,.~ ,.------,-;, ••. .-------11'' ..... ..,,,s,,,,., .. ._.," .... ,s. fi' , ~llll jf·~ "'~ ,., .. .,t1r i ' ,..,,.J4 a 1-4~~11 :w :,• ij., • I I ~ ---·---SE~~~.;r-.r,r----n:r.t> I. . .. " ,... ".' KCSP 481066 -,1 8109100503 ' ' I I , ~ -----~- ... ' ' ,,,.~ :I .... ,,,., ~ cJ_v ____ J ,,r, 1': £11rz \! I .,,, • z I ~ 1~ ~ ' '.Qi • ~~::. ~ ~: - l ' This sketch is provided, without charge, for your information. It is not intended to show all matters related to the property including, but not limited to, area, dimensions, easements, en· croachments, or location of boundaries. It is not a part of, nor does it modify, the commitment or policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes NO UABILITY for any matter related to this sketch. Reierences should be made to an accurate survey for further information. CONDmONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTINUED (b) ln the event of any litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competenl jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title, as stated herein. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage 10 any Assured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Assured in setlling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. 9. Reduction ol Llablllly or Termination or Liability. All payments under this Guarantee, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liabilily pro tanto. IO. Payment or Loss. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement of the paymen1 unless the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within thiny (30) days thereafter. 11. Subrogation Upon Payment or SetllemenL Whenever lhe Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any ac1 of the Assured claimant. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property in respect 10 the claim had this Guaranlee not been issued. Ir requested by the Company, the Assured ·shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this righ1 of subrogation. 'The Assured shall permit the Company to sue. compromise or se1tle in the name of the Assured and 10 use the name of the Assured in any transaction or litigation involving these righis or remedies. If a paymenl on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the Company shall be subroga1ed 10 all rights and remedies of the Assured after the Assured shall have recovered iis principal, interest, and cos1s of collec1ion. 12. Arbitration. Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the Assured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Arbitrable matters may include, bu1 are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relating to this Guarantee, any service of the Company in connection with i1s issuance or the breach of a Guarantee provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amounl ofLiabili1y is $1,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured. All arbitrable matters when the amount of liability is in excess of $1,000,0CKI shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state in which the land is located pennits a coun to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall 8,Pply to an arbitralion under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be oblained from the Company upon request. 13. Llablllly Llmlled lo This Guarantee; Guarantee Entire Contract. (a) This Guarantee together with all endorsements, if any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this Guarantee, this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole. ' (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, or any ac1ion asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this Guarantee. ( c) No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, lhe Secretary, an Assistant Secre1ary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 14, Notices, Where SenL All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this policy and shall be addressed to: Consumer Affairs Department, P.O. Box 27567, Richmond, Virginia 23261-7567. (j 0 z 0 a 0 z "' . S~H~~E OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERA-..fflIS GUARANTEE 1. Excepl to lhe extenl that sp«jfic assurances are provided In Schedule A or Ibis Guarantee, the Company assumes no llablllly (or loss or damage by reason or the follow Ing: (a) Dcfec1s, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters against the title, whether or not shown by the public records. (b) (I) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property; or, (2) Proceedings by a public agency whlch may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not the matters excluded under (I) or (2) are shown by the records of the taxing aulhority or by 1he public records. (c) (I) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservalions or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) water rights, claims or title to water. whether or not the matters excluded under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records. 2. Notwithstanding any spcdfic assurances which are provided In Schedule A or this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason or lhe following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting 1he 1itle 10 any propeny beyond the lines of the land expressly described in the description se1 forth in Schedule (A), (C) or in Part 2 of this Guarantee, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways 10 which such land abuts, or rhc right to maintain therein vaults, runnels, ramps or any snucture or improvements; or any rights or casements therein, unless such propeny, rights or casements are expressly and specifically set fonh in said description. (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other mauers, whether or no! shown by the public records; ( 1) which are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the Assureds; (2) which result in no loss to the Assured; or (3) which do nol result in lhc invalidity or potential invalidity of any judicial or non-judicial proceeding which is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provided. (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to in Schedule A. (d) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to in !his Guarantee. GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS l. Definition o(Terms. The following terms when used in the Guaramee mean: (a) lhe • Assured~: lhe pany or parties named as lhe Assured in this Guarantee, or on a supplemental writing executed by the Company. (b) ·1and~: the land described or referred 10 in Schedule (A)(C) or in Pan 2, and improvemems affixed thereto which by Jaw constitute real property. The 1erm "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred 10 in Schedule (A)(C) or in Pan 2, nor any right, title, imerest, estate or easement in abutting streets, road.I, avenues, alleys, Janes, ways or waterways. (c) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. {d) "public records~: records established under state statutes at Date of Guarantee for !he purpose of imparting constructive notice of ma tiers relating 10 real property 10 purchasers for value and without knowledge. (e) "date·: the effective date. 2. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Claimant. An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse 10 lhe title to !he estate or interest, as staled herein, and which might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then all liability of the Company shall tenninatc with regard 10 the matter or ma1tcrs for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any Assured ullder this Guarantee unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only 10 the extent of the prejudice. 3. No Duly to Defend or Prosecute. 1be Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which the Assured is a party, notwithstanding the narure of any allegation in such action or proceeding. 4. Company's Option lo Defend or Prosecute Actions; Duty or Assuttd Claimant to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as sci forth in Paragraph 3 above: (a) The Company shall have the right, it its sole option and cost, lo institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, interpose a defense, as limited in (b), or 10 do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the tenns of this Guaramee, whether or not it shall be liable hereunder. and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. (b) If the Company elects to exercise its options as stated in Paragraph 4(a) the Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the righ1 of such Assured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Assured and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel, nor will the Company pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by an Assured in the defense of those causes of action which allege maners not covered by this Guarantee. (c) Whenever lhe Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as permitted by the provisions of this Guaranlee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appca] from an adverse judgment or order. {d) In all cases where this Guarantee pennits the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, an Assured shall secure lo the Company the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and pennit lhe Company 10 use, at ils option, the name of such Assured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, an Assured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, ob1rurn•g wi'"""''· prn'g 01 defendi•g Ibo "'"o" 011,wful '" which i• 11,e opiruo• of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title 10 the estate o, interest as stated herein, or 10 establish the lien righ!S of the Assured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligatioits 10 the Assured under the Guarantee shall tenninate. 5. Proof or Loss or Damage. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided to the Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and swom to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company within ninety (90) days after the Assured shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage sha11 describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitulc the basis of loss or damage and shall stale, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of lhe Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligation to such assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition, the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of lhe Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably penain 10 the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of !he Company, the Assured shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine. inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the cus1ody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain 10 the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company pursuant to lhis Section shall not be disclosed to olhers unless, in 1he reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of 1he claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested infonnation or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation. shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guaranlee 10 the Assured for that claim. 6. Options lo Pay or Otherwise Settle Oaims: Termination or Liability. In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amounl of Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. 1bc Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result in Joss to the Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or, if this Guarantee is issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder, the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing !hereon, together with any costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all liabili1y of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers lo purchase said indebtedness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness, together with any collaleral security, to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. Upon the exercise by lhe Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (a) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other lhan to make 1he payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised i1s oplions under Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With lhe Assured Claimant. To pay or 01herwise settle with olher parties for or in the name of an Assured claimant any claim assured against under this Guarantee, togciher with any costs, auomeys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by lhe Company up lo the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than 10 make the payment required in that paragraph, shall lcrmina1e, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4. 7. Determination and Extent or Liability. This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against acrual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein described, and subject to 1he Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. 1bc liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed 1he least of; (a) the amount of liability stated in Schedule A or in Part 2; (b) the amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, as limited or provided under Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations, at the time the loss or damage assured agains1 by this Guaran{ee occurs, togelher wi1h interest thereon; 01 (c) the difference between the value of !he estate or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or interesl subject to any defect, lien or encumbrance assured against by this Guarantee. 8. I.lmllallon ofLlablllty. (a) If the Company establishes the tide, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures any olher matter assured against by this Guarantee in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect 10 that matter and shall 001 be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTINUED ON BACK COVER CLTA Guarantee Conditions and Stipulations Form 2015-7 (Rev. 12-15-95) ORIGINAL , i j I ' ! I I I ! ; I I i j i I ··t I I I ! I ' ' I ' rr.mumcric.:1 j THIS SPACE PROVIDED J:OR RECORDER'S USE; i h TRANSAMEIUCA /li · 1TT1.E INSURANCE Al.ED ,OR RECORD AT R£0UESTOF Tide lnsur:inccComr;tny ".: ,; .. ,: '.·.J./~ I! : , .. :; ::-;;1~:.",:'-'.~:i. ;:,):,;;-;,;11( ::J : (·;::i; :\·:,~. f!.Ei oo~ © ~ ~ w ~@ SEP O 6 2001 ! i ' I WMEN AECCRDED RETlJRN TO . \]. ::,1.\ '. ,. } j ~:.r.1:1 N.,,... ___ ,.,,., __ --·-RESmflll'IAL _ ESCltCl<l , ... ]],K: .................. _,_, .. 24837 -104th Ave se llOJA ~ ,.....11_ .. ________ ~~;2g WA .... 98031 .......................... _ .. , ....... .. DEC 261989 106015 99/12/26 RECD f: RECFES CASHSL lt07S9/ O ~.oo z.oo . '"'***7'. 00 55 . . ................................. -............ _.,.· K.C. D.D.E.S. ' b City. S11t1, Zip,. _____ ,. •• , ........................................................................... . CD N N ... O'l Cl) TH£ GRANTOR Statutory Warranty Deed n£CMAS M. BEVAN and MARGARET M. BEVAN, husband and wife f ...... TEN OOLLARS {$10.001 and all other good and valuable consideration I I I ror mid iru:anaid,n:ition or 3: iohandPIUd.coa~mndwamintato RC8ml' A. MAm and CLYDEJtAE MA.IR, husband and wife 1 thefollowina dlllCl'ibt!d naJ. ,:,at.ate. •ituated in tho Cowity of King , StoC.of Wuhlnston: s--1 ~1 '?--j f\• 'nlE NCm'II \ Of! THE NCRrH \ OF THE NOOT!!I/EST I OF TH!: NOO'l'HWESr I OF THE SCXlrl!F.AST I ""' OF SEx:TIOO 14, tomship 23 HCRI'H, RAla 5 EAST, W.M.: E1CCEPr THE WEST 30 FEEr ClJNVE'lED TO KIN:: COONl'Y IN DEED RECOOJEO UND!ll R>Xml>ING NO. 1094 243: . SmME IN TH& caJN1'Y OF KING, STATE OF 1/l\SHl'.OOt'ON, TCX:E'fflER WITH fixblre of 1975 Silch 68xl6 M::lbile Hane, Seri.:sl NJ. 5248 together with all appurtenat1ces thereunto. soan;x:r ro, 1. Easenent in favor of King county Wat:ar District for water and sewer ma.in ::eco'1:led Wlder Rea>rdin~ No. 7507170570, {2.,, ~~~ ~·~~~-.:& ,. '- , 1069. sT"fsti(W'l~XNff l -STATE OF WASHINGTON ) -; .... :d~:: ~ .-: : .-. ;? n ·~ -. .., ·~ .. = .... " M <> m < "· .. "' ;;; .. !: couNT(.;r:.4 ~----· COUNTY OF ... -·,--.. ··--·-.. ··----··-a. !' cia\JGi";i-;,. pt'~a-il';To~~.,i:d tw,lorl! mo On thi, .................... d11y cf ... _. _____ ,,,. ..... -........... -...... ___ .. ___ ,, UP.,----• ~;...; M . lleV az,tl J.a,-aret M. Bevan bd'ore 1110. lhe undarw~. o Notary Public: in GM for Ula St.ate, o{ Wah• t....,.~·: .. li.; 4n' __ ,!_' ' .. !I ' dW .. ·-;--,i,.._ .. ~--.1;1---•~-·-:------......... -~ ... ·-j;-~ •111:&oll, 1 mmmm.ioncd and 1wom, Pl!noRlllly appeqrf'd.. ______ _ ta ~-knowd to bo 1he 1ndlridwd describr:-d ------·-·····--· .. ·----_____ _ MIO q:rt\l&cdi.rl!l"wiihin orul toriii:oini: i"'tNIIIC'nl, ud.. _____ ..... --·-------=--...:..,_._:=.==-.:::..== <And acknowledrcd'thar: •. tbe.y ... .') 11,nt'd tho umo to mo lrllflwn 1,c, be tha ·--------Prmidait ond,._, ___ ,,_, __ , . .9ttrotary, Laa .~:__.t.he.1.r.:;:rrra mid whani.+,, art and dl't'd. ·mpedively,~C-·------------------·--------- Cor tlflt. urs ancl.pui,,-lhereia menlloned. ti,. ~~r11uon thin ell!nlled tho fctt11oina iiulrument, Dl!d oclrnowll!dced 1. ...... \. , the wd iiutnuacnt to bo the {1ec and ~tuncary act and dn:d or Mid mrpc,r • LPB•IO .. .-_j .-' Atioa. for the u... and purr,oaes thetdn menUoned. and on OGth 1tated that -·-----·· aulhorh:NI lo tl«ulo the mid iiutrwnent ond that the, aeoJ 4111nd t. lh, airponi~ tl!II of uid cor.,oraition. a.:!~i:n.my hend and 41Jlciel ml hareto llllltt'd tho day llDd year l!nt Notory Public in aad fo, t~St.ltocl W111hinctan. ~iding-ql_ ···----- My appoi,ntma,t cxpi~: ............................... . I I i I ' . I ,_.....,.....,....,,,,....,..,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,., ___ ~--...... ==~--if MAIN :FILE COPY --- ' .. ' ,. , ' j5090\•'l20C O~h09:0D M UHC COUNTY RECQRDS 001 PMt 7.00 First American Title Insurance Company Filc.-d rnr Record nl Heque11t of Nome DAVID A. NYBLOH ond DEBRA L. ALB1SO Addre1111 ~l~J,,,6"'0"'6'--"1~5.8.,_~t,,h--'fl"v"e"-'S"'."E".'-------·--·------- City ond State Renton. WA 980S9 Quit Claim Deed ,, THI$ SPACE PROYIOEO FOR RECORDER'S USE: THE GRANTOll DAVID A. HYBLOK. as his separate estate (or nnd in con!'litforntion or CIPT OP LOVE AND AFFECTION TO ESTABLISII MARITAi. COKHUHITY IKTEREST convey" ond quit clnim!'I to DAVID A .. NYBLOH and DEBRA L. ALB ISO. Buebond and Wif'e fj ~~,:~~~:w~~~ ~~~:~~~;~;~::,::~~:i·es!tt;~:~:;ntt~~(~o::;~l:::: ltINC Stute of Wo11hini;i:ton, r: '\_ HE EAST JUU.F OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTSR Of' THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, ~ N OWHSHIP 2 3 tlORTH. RAHGE S EAST. WXL~&TTE: M6RI0IAH. tN KING COUNTY, WASHI.NCTOH; ;;_t ~ XCSPT THAT PORTIOU OF' SAID EAST HALF OF' THE NORTHWEST QTJA.RTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ~ l.iMT;;a OF SAID SECTIO?J 14 06SCRIDEO AS FOLLOWS 1 ~~ £.QIHHING AT TH£ SOUTHEAST COP.?1SR OF SAID B~ST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF ··.t ~. HE: SOUTHEAST QUA.RTEP. AS THE' POINT OF TRUE BEGINNING: ~ :::r HEt'tCE HORTH l 5 • 2 l' EAST 52 l , 9 !I' FEET ALQ?[lj: THS EAST LINE OF SAIC EAST HALF OF THE !':'; 10RTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOt.rrHEAST QUARTER; ··: L~":°HEtlCE tJORTH oa•o'7'58'" WEST GSl.61 FEET TO THE WEST t.IUE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THS ~·noRTHWE'ST QUARTER OF' THE SOUTHEAST QUAATE:R: THENCE SOUTH 0•27'05" WEST 525.8:! FBET TO THE SOUTH LIU£ OF SAID EAST RALF OF THE NORT~WEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST OUARTEP.; THE:t1C£ SCUTH 88°1 '7' 35'' £A.ST 653. 84 FEET A.LONG THS SCUTH LUl't: OF SAID £AST HALF OF THE trORTHWEST QUARTER OF' TH& SOUTHEAST QUAATER TO THE TP.UE POINT OF BEC:IUHUIG1 ANO EXCEPT COU?TTY ROADS. lll~ J~uly 2lor:. -----. 19_?_5 __ _ ~-gc--:;::-· __ o,1-+--(),a---------liY-----·-----,----------~ 1rrc1ii.f•ntl liy ____ _ r' ................. "'"'"'"'"' , STA'l'I-: ,, •• WASIIINf:"WN _ .... -op_.~1i.).;rr~°\'~ASfilNC.TON KING _J "~ ~~-.... ;.'.1.",.;"~;~•, ~ .... :-,,.. J , •. rouNT,·ur. ___ ------·--r9;'-/6"_ cou~\1-M_ --------- U111h111 dny J"nonally nr11rared ~fort-inr ft:tJ/ ~QTA,9ir"~h,~ ___ dny or _____________ 19 ___ , Davi.d A. N blom ~ \ -"trc'l'i:Rl'in,. l t' u eu111ncd. a Nntnry Pubhc 1n and for the Stau· of Wa.hlngton. duly rom• -·· ·--_y_ ----·-----· -~~~; P{m~d 1b ,rn.JH'l!llonallyn1111enu•d ·-···-·-·- ... , .. ,. ·T.""l!A_'-.1 q;,,c..:,J to mt-kn•1wn tn hr 1hr imliv1du11ll!11I 1lt"•rtilll'd in 11,"l,~ •,,,~;: •• -=-·;-"')-·/-·----····-·-------------- ••t-ru1NI tht-wilhin 11ml fortttuin,: in,tn,m,nt, ti(i!.10.l:"'"ed ... _: ·· ~ .~ arknowlf'd,i•rt that __ h.e_ _____ 11i11n•d <k.• 11a111~'-\..1o.'Ui,. 0~lffl tn bct1h•--· -·-·-···-·-P'""idl'nl 1r,d _______ S•rrtLllry, ... . .. his ..... -. __ frt-1' and ..-olu111ar)· 11r1 and drPd, l'V•JJ"'c1i,·•ly, ul -···--·-····. ·-·· . for 1hr 11 .. u 11 n,t 1u111 m,.•" 1hrrri,i mpnlinn•d. thr rnrpn1111in11 lh111 e1Hutrd th• fnrr111>in11 in11lrumt!'nl.and 11tknowl•d•ed the eaid inll.n.i· Hy appoinr:.ment eJtpircs: 1/1/97 I.J>IJ.12 CG/8-41 mpnl In h,:o llu, """ 11nrl vnluntnry llcl nnd drt-d r,f 1111id cory,nr11,tion. for lhl' UIII'• and purpn ... ~ thrrl"in fflt'Rlinnl'cl, nnd nn oath 11lnl!d 1h11t --· -----·--,,-:;------,-~~ audu,rind lu •••n1IC!' lhP ""id inol ruml'nl and that I ht!' 11r11J affi1pd i111hr r:irpc,11111' Hal c,f Hild tur1~ntaliun. \\'ilnl'"" my h111ul 11ml nUici•I 11ral hnrln 11ffi•.,.d th• day 11nd y•ar fird abnvr ,vrittf'n. NnMry Public i,-;-;;.;;;i;.;-; lhl' S1a1r .. r W11ohin11:t•m. ruidio,i: at ····•ww1n1~,'m>--~~~ "-rs*'!,,. E> ·~>~ aib:9"!:~,·~ -~-v ... _..~11';-;-:;_-.i.~~,i,;':f.-;-::~·r,·. Q «.f(fh. ------............ ..:...~,,.._,,._.d:..,c,,,,,:::.-,.-. v.:.m 0 0 . 0 0 • ., "' .... ~ M .... ,_ 0 0 M ., 0 .. .. ~ "' J ! i \ t j l I :1 1 • ' • ., 1 l 7 1 1 :ll .. ·'l '~ .•. [)~ .if l ~-;;. I ,} .. '·' • ' ~ .'. I I Ka5.&t1E.tlI ·· nns AGREEMENT made this t5 £!!.. day of ..... 1-1 ........ A-..._Y ___ _ 19 7£ , l:>y and and Mttt?X: beCVeen ---~ .... ,..,,.~~··~€~&'.__L. __ ~·-<= ..... «~:.~~(V .... a~i~t-·al{'~-------- M. , h.i.o wife, hereinafter called "Grantors•, and King County Water District No, 90, a municipal corporation of King County, Washington, hereinafter called -crantee." WlTNESSETI11 That oaid Grantor(s), for valuable consideration, do(es) by these presents grant, bargin, sell, convey and confirm unto the oaid Grantee, its successors, or assigns, a right-of-way or ease• mant for Water and Sewer Mains with necessary appurtenances over, through, across and upon the following described property situated 1n King County, Washington, particularly described as follows, A PERMANENT EASEMENT described as the Northerly 30 feet of the E% of the NWk of the SE\ of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range S Eaot, W,M,, leos County Road, f}l£D fill Record. at lie'.;~est -J r...-. H c ";,,, L.k C C ·, · e c, I ,J, _, l!!,!4in---- •• Record Owner, Roger L, Chandler Easement No, 14-23·5-6 196SO 108th Ave, S,E, Renton, Washington 98055 •• ' ; I ' I 11\at said Gcantee shall have the right without prior institution of any suit or proceeding at law, at times as may be necessary, to enter upon sa~d property for the purpose of constructing, repairing, altering, or reconstructing said Water or Sewer Hain, or making any connections therewith, without incurring any legal obligation or lia- biU.ty therefor1 provided that such constructing, repairing, alterirg or reconstructing oi said Water or Sewer Kain shall be accompli~hed 1n auch a manner that the private illlprovementa existing in this right-of-way shall not be disturbed or desp:oyed, or in the.~"1lnt they are disturbed or destroyed, they will be replaced in as"gbod a condition as they were immediately before the property was entered upon by the Grantee, The Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of said easement, so long as said use does not interfere Yith the installa- tion and maintenance of cha Water and SeYer Hain and so long aa no permanent buildings or structures are erected on said easement, 'n\is easement shall be a covenant running Yith the land and shall be binding on the successors 1 _heirs,.and aoaigns of both parties hereto, STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) 1, the undersigned, a notary public in~~for the Stat§ of Washington, hereby cert\!)'_that on this /~~ day of .HdilU. , 19~, personally appeared before me " -,fl-~--e-,_-J..-.-,-z.~11.11Jt.;, and Hita,,11 H c.1"4c . to me known to be the individuals descri~n and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed and sealed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the usea and purposes therein mentioned, & ,/2?.e, r;L~ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Sea#k, Jt/A. · .. -· &Ali&tl!li.S.X YH1S AGaEENEJIT mado Chio 31 Jf day of ...... ff< ...... •sP:----• 19 Zf-• by ond boCtfOoa R,,~/ B • ke..d ond 7q,.aS&> /( 11,r.,J,~ lt<lroiaofcor collod "Groncor-o•, aa4 It1Ds C:-cy &cor Dlocrlcc 13o, 11n, o litllnlClP<>l cor-poroT"lon of !tias C:-cy0 eoob1Dgcon 0 boroiaofcor collod "Grlfflcoo,• Ml"mKSSnH, 1'hoc oold Grancor(o), for voluablo CODBldoratlon, do(oo) by Chooo prooanco granc, baraln, ooi.!., convoy lilDd confirm unco Cbe o,,ld Gr,inceo, lco succoro..ro, or ooo1gno, o rlgbc•of..,oy or oaoo• aoat for WDtor end Sewoc lfai1·0 1,;leh MCGIGoary oppurcenoncoo aver, Chr-,S, ocrooo ond upon ~,.. f.ollOYing doocribod prop:,rey Bicuacod 1D !tins Couney, Woohingce.s, ...,rclculorly doecribod oo follOYoo A ~Ell'i' iAJif;KEIIT doocrlbod oo tho llOn:herly 30 foot ot tho 1111k .>f Cho 1111k ot tho S£1i; of Socclon 14, TIR1DBb1p 23 11ore11, £loJIGC) 5 Eaoc, lf.H. 0 1000 C-cy llood, -f • . ~ ,..-._.,., • / ::' "( ,•vr,.,. _. ,L'-""'-~ ~ , '! .I -t,. -~ 1:. ~., ·-: ::L_,, ..... ~ ..... ' .. f:u:J for Rettlrd zt f'.e:;~rlt of ~ \.,\ c..£Ao, , k· e, C(,%Y •./ Record OWnor, Royol a. !torch ZallOllt9nt Ao, 14•2l•S•S , 5021 s.e. Davoon scrooc Soocclo, lfoohingcon 98116 •• n,oc oold Groaceo llbaU haw mo.i;igbc fflellouc prior boelcucloa of ony ou1c or proc00dt.ns oc lou, ot' olmo oo lll!llS? bo meooooey, co oncor upon oold prop.,rty for Clio purpooo of conecrucct.ns, ropot.rt.ns, olcorL'l!I, or rocoaocrucct.na oat.d Vocor or S6lt<ar Mab, or Cl9hlns l!IDV conaaceiono Chororieh, ridlouc l.llcun'ln&.I eav logal Obliaatloa or lt.0° bUlcy tborofor1 provldod thac ouda conotruccln&.I, Nl'Olrllli\, oltsrt.na or roconotructlna of oold Vocor or S<m;>r Hob lilllllU bo occcmpllsbod I.A ouch o moimor thee mo prt.voto lcprOVGm1nco eat.sct.na I.A Cillo rlahc•of-voy ohBU noc bo dlacurbocl or do11aoy,.d, or I.A Cho ovonc Clloy oro d1ocurbed or doocroyod, C!l<JY rill 119 roplocad I.A oo ;cod o cocdl.c1on oo Chey ""3ro imlilaidl.stoly llofoco dlo proparcy uoo encored upon by ells Orancoo, '; 111::> Crontor oholl Ntab Cho dQIIC co uoo Cite> ourfoco of oold .ri ooooaont, oo lOIIQ oo oo1d uoo dooo not lacorfON rit:h t:ho botollo0 ,-clon oad =1ntononco of dlB Votor ond Sc,t,ar Mmb sad oo lona oo no p:::>rClllftOnt buUd1n;o or ocruccuroo oro oroctod °" oo1d ooooaont, fillo oooom:,nt ohoU bo o covononc runnlnG uit:h tho land ond oholl bo b1nd111Q on cbo ouccooooro, hat.ro, end aodpo of both -~o >oro~. 2r ~ ~ ~ /• .. /1-·-........ z ~-K" : I(/..,~ ,(.#...-...,1:z STAYE OI' IIASHUIGTCIM) COll3TY 01' ltllilO J ss 1, C!l<l underolamd, o notary public 1n ond for Cho Scoco of Hoo111n&ton, holroby cort~,l that on dl1o 3(e; doy of A1frl:I --------• 19 , poroonolly oppoand boforo, "" ?~( I ln«4 and lfwc t 4t-t,L :n: • to £1u10Yn co bo mo ladlvlduolo doocdbed 1n 4nd vbo oxocutod tbo forogolng 1nocr,aonc, ond oclulovlodgod that Cllsy OliftOd ond ooolod tho so= oo Choir froo ond voluntary occ oad dood, for tho uaeo oftd purpoooo tborolll litilnelonod. ',.; ;• .• • 0 ' FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: PUGET POWER RC.SL ESTATl DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 970.14 AF.LLEVUE. WASHINGTON 98009-9734 I .. ORIGINAL EXClo"E TAX MOT R~QUIRFD · ·j\ine Co Records Drl!Siol'\ ) -/, -/ .· ,J..!.U, ..._ o,c·.,1, 8·~---::-...:------EASEMENT and Debra A 1 bi so For and in cons,derahon or Ono Collar ($1 00) ond other valuable con,ldcrolion. lhft receipt of which is hereby acknowfodged. DAVID A. NYBLOM,,t.11:::lxmolARt'Bd:~RCIIR rGranlo(" heroin), hareby grants, convoys and war1.1nts 10 PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a Washington corporation ('"Grantee" herein), ror 1he purposes horoinaner set lonh. a perpetual easement over, across and under Iha rollr.rw1ng descubed real property (Iha "Property" herein) 1n KING COUNTY, Wast11ng1on SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 'A' Ewcept as may ba otharwlsa sat forth herein Grantee's r1;hts shall bo axarci,ad upon thal portion of the Property (the "Right-of-Way"' tutreln) doscnbed H roirows A Rrght-ol-Way ren (10) feel in wtdth having five (5) feet of such width on each s.ida or a canterlina dasc:rioad as follows THE CENTERLINE OF GRANTEE'~ FACILITIES AS CONSTRUCTED OR TO BE CONSTRUCTED. EXTENDED OR RELOCATED, LYINO W1TH:N THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. 1. Purpaaa. Grantee sholl have the right to constrvct. operate, maintain, repair. replaca and anlarga ontt or more atact11c tran1,mfn,lon and/or distribution hmts o\lar and/or under tho Right-or-Way together witn ell nacessa,y or convenient appurtenances thereto, Which ma)' include but are not limited to the following· a. overhead facilities. Poles and/or towers wilh crossarms. braces, guys and anchors, eleclt1c traMm1ssion and d1stribut1on 11nes; communication end signal lines; transformers. b. Underground facllltlea. Underground conduits, cables, vaults. manho!l!s, !!.wilct'les and transformers: semi-buried or ground mounted lac1lilles such as pads, transformers end switches. Following tt&' initial conslruct1an of its rac1t.ties. Grantaa may from lime to time canstruct such additional l1nff and olhor fac1litios as 1t may require. 2. Access. Grantee !I.hall have the right of acceu to the Righi-of-Wey over end across the Property to enable Grantee to exercise ils rights hereunder, provided, that Grantee shall compensate Granter ror any damage to tne Property cousttd by Iha olCercisa cf said right or access J. Cutting of Treea. Grantee shall t,ave ttle ngM to cut or trim any and all brush or treas standing or growing upon the Right-of-Way, and also the 11ghl to cut er tr,m any trees upon tha Property which, in falling, could in Grantee's reasonable judgment, be a hazard lo Grantee's facililiot1 . ... Granter'• Use or Right-of-Way. Gr,.1nt-1r rc:.~rves lhc rioht re use lho P.1ghl-c-l-V1:ny for en~ purpose not inconsistent with the rights herern granled. provuled, that G1antor shall not construct er maintain anv Du1ldmg or ether structure on the R1ght,of-Way and grantor shall do no blasting within 300 feel of Grantee's lacll1Ues without Granlee's puor written consent 5. lndemnuy. By accept,ng and recording this ea!ement. Grantee agrees to Indemnify end hold harmless Grontor from anv and all claims for injuries and/or damages suttered by any pl!tfson. whrch may be caused by the Granlee's e,uuci1e of the ri9hts herein granted; provided, that Grantee shall not be responifble to Granter for ony 1njur1os and/or damages to any person caused by acts or emissions of Gtantor e. Abandonment. The rights her~n granted shell continue until such time es Grantee ceases to use the Righi-of-Way for a period of five (5) successivo years. in which event this easement shall lMminate and all rights hereunder shall revort to Granter. provided, that no abandonment shall bo deemed to have occurred by reason or Gran1ee·s failure to initially in1tan its facihlies an the Right-or.way within any period or time from the data t'lereof. 7. succeuar and Aaislgns. The nghls and obligations of the po1rt1n shall inure to tho benefit of and be b1nd1ng upon their rm.pective successors and assigns. 70.S 30 2~ JH. ACOOl/9501465 • mgc: 23S ·56 ,···: j@JdF ' ' ! . ! I ' .. ' •• iJ. -~·;· ... : 0 ' ., ' DATED lhls -~,t;_>:l.' __ day ol_.!.h..;l!!::.:d::.~.:....".:.~...:....;',/-/ ------------~ 10 ?S- GRANTOR: DAVIO A. NYBLOM, ·~""-Debra A b1 so BY: Vo,n'LJO. Ylr41= ev:OoOn-,.0. ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF /( / Aj(r ) ) ss l -· On this day personalty appeared baron, ma DAVID A. NYBLOM, to me known to be the individual(&) described in and who axecuted the within and foregoing Instrument, and acknowtedgltd that ho algned the aama aG hJs free end ~~\~d deed for the uses end purposes lheretn menlloned . .:-~~~~~~~~dofflctalSoollhls 'o,(, dayof Feer(qAo/ 19 91-. -'~ ---., '·.•,,"5h '• /1 ~ JJ ;:- 0 -. ,-:;AH);\ '\ (,~~ ~- ::. r .. ~~ ~ .,."-;: } ~ Print N= ~.: , .. : . .· l.'l·~'-..\v _ •. · =-~ -.. ·•.. ~ . · .... <f~: , . : o'; "1;~-;.~~'*'0__.:-• , '\,I"'\~ _ .... \ \ ''''-"'''- Notary Publlc In and for tha Stato of W;nhlngton Ro,ldlno at J'.b 11 it U, ee.,;> My commission oxpiros -~,3~-~( d .... -~'f~,~---- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTYOF KIUf.r ) 1}tn,11D M,~1...0~ ,.,....,c, On this day peBonally eppeered before mo Q E:.dR.A Al r1' J SD to mo known to bathe lndividualts) dHCttbad In and who execuled tha within and faragolng in,trumanl, anci acknowledged lhat SAG signed thaaama as bS:f rrae and voluntary act and deed ro, Iha u1t1 and purposes therein mentioned. ,e9( Notary Publlc In ana for the Sin.to or Washington Res;o;ng at :::?Jy:-fr I J cc My r-,u::-''7 My commission expires ~,..,lc.'.,_, .. ,¢::...:z~\ ____ _ l ' J ! 1 ., j J. ~ .... ~ ~~·· .. ~ .. :t. ·::-- ·, .,. ~ ' . . ~ l i~·.· • 0 ) 9501465 JH-ACOOl 235-56 ' I EXHIBIT "A" THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUI\I\TER OP' THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 , TOWNSHIP 2l tlORTII, IU\NCE 5 EAST, NILLNtETTE MERIDIAN, IN KIHO COUHTY, WI\SHINCTOtlt EXCEPT TIIAT PORTION OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE HORTHWEST QUARTER OF TU£ SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECT JOH 14 DESCRIBED I\S FOLLOWS: OECIHNIHC AT THE SOUTIIEJ\ST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUI\RTER OF TIIE SOUTHEAST QUI\RTER I\S THE POINT OP' TRUE: B£OIHNIN01 TIIEtlCE NORTH 25•21 • El\ST 52J.99 FEET I\LONC THE EAST LI.NE OE' SAID £1\ST 111\LF OF TIIE HORTIIWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUMTERt THENCE HORTH ee•o, • 50" WEST 65l. 61 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST 111\LF OF TIIE HORTll'WEST QUARTER 01• THE SOUTHEAST QUARTERt THENCE SOUTH 0•27•05• NEST 525.82 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID El\ST HJ\LF OF THE: tlORTH'WEST QUARTER OF THB SOUTHEAST QUARTER1 THENCE SOUTH 88°17'3S'" !:AST 653.84 FEET Al.ONO THE SOUTH LINE OF SI\IO EI\ST HALF OF TIIE HORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEI\ST QUARTER TO TUE TRUE POIHT OF DECIHUIHC; I\ND EXCEPT COUNTY R0ADS4 ,. ·; I I I ; • J ·1 i l ., ' J ] ·~ j •! J l -.~ ' ! ., j •• i j :1 .j 1 I . ,, ' I ., ., .. ~ ~--------~../.: .. --------·---~ :/! Ir. i. 1~ P L."· ,< f',_/ i/-l:l '· ,t;t_l.· ~ .•. !J' : l 1..-t, ) ._.;-;,,f,"( ~ _/l.1.,,,,,/'"': · --~-1--./ • C'-:1..,, .,.,,,--/_, . I,,,· II ----/2./.' .,,,~-. . .... . ,. -'l\ ..... . ,.,._,,,._:,;.._) i !· I :~~~m o;e:s~!:LISHME~ Filed Ma;_: l!/:l /1 d ~>5r'\ • /. /. I HARRY B NELSON coUN·r:t ROAD /,;.Y iAJ .... ..S·t ~ljX· Ir=--;.,·.:; ·, .. _,~--: r, · i-. Com at pn-c 1268.82 ft W of cor comm 1:0 Secs 11,12,13~\ '.1· ·\,· 1 and 14-23-5, being pnt on County Road No 434, rung th. S · .. ,....... '. , I: a dist 2624.20 ft, th S 0°04.'45" E a diet 2638.60 ft and ,·. i 1 ending at pnt 1308.15 ft W of cor comm to Secs 13,1. 4,23 ,.,.-~. · ,· · 1I_·, { and 24-23-5 being pnt on County Road No 135 .· · ~ ) ~·; ' I 60 ft in w~d:.~ .. excl o~,1 slop!s for cut! and; f'i.1.1y--~-' ,:. ):. ! ·1· / .. .:f ,_ ,. ,.( d .. ,L.,-.,-.,CL, /-... /1 C,,1, 'ZI /lp:-·, •. ·-:--:, /' ·~· '\' · 1 I! tr-· . . ,. -f J t;..;:1 -· I ._, __ .,... c ff,, .. · ,' • ,... . · If I • -:.";'-...... ;:-· ····-r·· ..m:::n,1,,1.., ......... ;J ... 1 --· 1 _ ~-. i . , · -· , -.· • . ·' . . · ,' .-f',:-1 11j ·. ' j -. --... ·-~--,-----·-\, '. .• ,& I I I ·' .. , __ I .. ·1 . YOUM!/PAGI! l NI ii~ o YOWNSHUIP' 23 NORT&i, RANGE S IE~S1, W.M. 0 a 0 ~ 1DO 200 e-Mwwi>wt:!Sw~w,..0 :tt<& .,J ,. • 100· Aoriz. SS OF IIEAftCjC (KCAS) LEGAL tli!SCRIPTIO~ IFIIOlld TITU! Rl!PORT • GEi! NOTl! 31 TH£ EAST H,U 0/F TH£ NORTH~ST QUARTEA OIF TH£ SOUTHEAST QUAIIT[JI OIF §!:CIIOH 14. TO-23 NO:ITH, AANGC 5 EAST, o:u.u.st:TTE IIOIIDIAH. IN KING Cc,JHTY, l'IASHIIICTON: CXCEPT !HAT POAl!OI< '• SAID EAST HM.I' OIF THE NORTHWl'.ST QUARTEA OIF ™E SOU1k£AST QUAAT[A rH SA10 S£C110H 14 C[SCRlll[D AS FOLLOl>S: BEGINIOIO AT 1'41: SOU1'41:AST COA1<ER OIF SAID EAST HM.I' OF THE NOATH~ST QUAllltR OF TH£ S0UTH£AST QUAAT[A AS THE l'OIHT OIF lRtii; BEGINHlt;v; THENCE IIORlH 00'2!!'21° EAST 523.99 "1:1' ALONG TH£ EAST UN£ OF SAID EAST HALI OIF 1!4£ NOA™"EST CUAP10I a, THE SOUTHEAST QUAAltR: THO<CI! NORTH IIBVTS8" "'1;ST 853.81 FUT TO THE =T UNE OIF SAID EAST MM.I' OIF THE NOllTHVCT QUAAT[A OIF THE SOUTHEAST QUAAlUI: TH£NCE st'IJTH 00'2T00° i,[ST 525.82 l1J:T TO THE SOUTH UNE a, SAID EAST HALI OIF THE NORTlfflEST QUART[A OF THE SQU11<£AST QUARlUI: 1'HfHQt SOUTH 88'1T35° EAST 8Sl.84 "1:1' ALONG THE SQUTH UN£ CII SAIO EAST ~"4/ al n<% NORTH.:tsT QUART[A al THE SOUTHEAST QUARTtJI TO THE TRIit PO:>IT al BE- A.'IO CXCEPT COUIOTY ROADS. 1) THIS SUA\<O' WAS BASED OIi A CO>ITACI. TAAVEASE USING A 10PC0>1 GTS-lC TOTAi. STA110N AHO EXaEl>S THE .,_ STAl<DARDS A£QUIREI) BY YIN:. 322-130-090. 2) THE LOCATIO>I OIF THE 180TH AVf. S.E. (A.IC.A. HARRY B. Nn.50M ROAD) YIAS DEmWIHtD FRQ! KING COUNTY AOAO SUR'IEY NO. 14~1 \'Cl. 287 1/2. J) AEFtRENCE Tin.E AEPOAT 8Y CHICACCI Tin.E INSUAAHCE CO., NO. %1'1S98, EJn:CTI>'E AUGUST 13. 1991. SE 1/4 OF SEC 'Ill, T. 13 !+, R. S IE.. W.M. Blll!;AICDO~ FtU1CD , vr 14 ............. '53.Z<• ""JU/ltO~ "-~ (Ot-15-12) MC:t V/ e:tASS """ .. CASl • DI CASE (O'l-~12) If c,. G./ EA.ST 01 MD f! 0. SCIUlH 01 M CM.C.. 11TH cal i © ~~e, (Ot-15-11) I:: • • ~ 2l I> ria 1 DO~ ~ aitfl :t at 1g.,a!t .• ,oy;;; i -. ... ·--" • k II .. a 9 ® ! I:: rtlUND r IJ'. !! v/ 8:tAS1 T.a ~ .... r...,.~ -i CM.C. 10TH CCR. -= (Dt-15,-92) u ~1"11 d.i!s ~ fl/ lDASI ,:moo• """'""' " ............ N99•39•01·\/ 2617.72' -.. CASl (00-,0..0,) . " u .. C0t-1s-12) BASIS OF' BEARING CKCCS> ~~~'!!~I A ~ ot' DOVillllL. ---~~ ~I ~=-==.:=:::=::=:::;:~~==~==~ DOW\. w.o.~. S11493,ra 38 a. 461 a.no ll&TM Avt.JO.lt Id. MOWOfifO. "'"' .:bell . -. . Ttl.. INCM oeo-1010 rr" .. r:roa, 000.10:-0 QQ'M ~LE ·]Ql-09 I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON II SHEET OF ____ . l. . ,, .. 1----, 47S.7° ~ FRO>! ..: SO PROP. fe COIi. nHCE-,.__ IS OX FOUNO IIEIIAR UN£ "111< NO CM' 0.5' EAST OF 71.J' FIIOM S'O PROP. COR. FDICE IS OX UN[ LINE NU> 468.2' HORII< OF ll<E S.E. PROP. COIi. (01-17-92) :l ~ ,. .., :.' • i 1JO' I ioi • ' <t i! I "' 'f..- ll!NCROACtQENT Dl!TAIL RIECORD!l!V\1'8 Cli!RTIIFICAT!i! ,CORDING NO.-------------- led fa, rOCO<d thio __ day ol ____ _,_19 : _ M. in Boc!t __ of at P'J90= ~ tho roquoal of 00\\\. En9inocnr. Inc. ..... __ .... _ -~ A ~, 1308.88 u ,"'•aa"'.='38 -=c y·=-01-.-+--:a::=,~,11.. nll'L.-'\ c-SE CORIO Cl 1kt SW QUAR'Et aF l1<I: SE OJARTQ OF SEC. 14 l!!IURWVOR'i!il Cf!RTl!l"ICA ,ria lhh> mOIJ corroc:ijy rOl)<o<>cnto • """"'Y -by 00\\\. En9inom"1J.. Inc. undc:r my diroc:tlon in eonlumanco '"th 1110 rcquircmcnto of tho SuM>)'OI'' a ~ Act ot tho roqu®t of 0Jr.'Jl0 NY"BLOW in ..u:.Y 1g..a~., S T'EPl<EN T. BOURNE Ccrtillcdo ""-28405 .. ' ' AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: 7 744958 17 PIRS~ SAVINGS BANK or WASHINGTON a3SS5 SB 36th ST, Ste. 255 Bellevue, WA 9BOD6-l48S ORDBR NUKBBRz 432598 ----------------1Sp6,NAbo91J'l1&blJaoFDl'llKonllqDUJ---------------- DEED OIF TRUST THIS OBED OF TRUST c·sccurity lmtrumcDt1 is made OD JULY 21, 1995 'nlc gra.alor is DAVID A. NYBl,OM AND DBBRA L. ALBISO HUSBAND AND W'IPB NORTHWEST FINANCIAL CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION FIRST SAVINGS BANK or WA.SHJNQTON which i.s organized and emting under the laws or THE STATB OP' WASHINGTON r.o. BOX 907 HALLA. WALLA, WASHXNOTON 99362 ("Borrower-). The trustee is ('Trustee·). The bcacOciary is . • and whose address is C-Lcndcr-). B01TIJwcr owes Lender the principal awn or TWO HUNDRBD THRBB THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED PlrrY AND N0/100 Dollars (U.S. S 203, 1so. DO ). Tb.is debt is evidenced by Bonowcr'a note dated tbcaamc date a., lhi.s:Sccuril)' ln.slnlmcnl C-Notc·). which provides for monthly paymcau. with the full debt. if not paid earlier. due ud payable on FEBRUARY l r 202 6 • This Security Imtrum.cnt secures to Lender: (a) the repayment or lhe debt evidenced by tho Note. with intercat. and aU rcnewols. extensions and modifications or the Note; (b) the payment of all other &WDS. with intcrcat. adY&Dccd under paragraph 7 lo protect the security of this Security lnstrumenl; aod (c) tbe pcrt'ormo.Dcc of Bonowcr"s covcnants and agreements under this Security Instrument and the Nole. For this purpose. Borrower incvoc:ibly grBnts and conveys to Trustee. in trust. with power of sale, the following described property locntcd in XJNG County, Wubington: LEGAL DBSCRIPTXON ATTACHED HBRBTO AND HADE A PART HEREOF. which ba.s the address of 13606 WasbingtOD 98059 l'Zip Code) 158TH AVS:NUE SOUTHEAST 1Sttccl) ("Property Addrcos"): RENTON (Cl)') TOGETHER WITH all the improvements now or hereafter ercdcd on the property, and all casements, appurtenances, and nxs.we5 now or hereafter a part or the property. All replacements and additions shall also be covered by this Security Instrument. All or the foregoing ls rcfcned to in this Security lmlnlmenl as the ·Property," BORROWER COVENANl'S that Bom>WCr i.s lawfully sciscd of the estate hereby conveyed and bas the right to grBnt and convey the Property and that the Property is uncneumbcrcd, except for coc:umbrancc.s or record. Borrower warraats and will defend generally the Lille to the Property against aU claims .and demands, aubjcd. to any cocumbrnncca of record. THIS SECURITY INSTRUMEITT combines WWorm covenants for national use o.nd aoa-unil'orm covenants with limited variation., by jurisdiction to coa.stitutc a wulorm security instrument CO"VCriDg rcaJ property. UNIFORM COVENANTS. Bonowcr and Lender covenant and 3grcc 115, follows: 1. PDyml!Dt or PrtodpAI aad la:ucst; Prrpaymeat a.ad Late Cb.Qraes. Borrower sbU promptJy pay when due the principal or and interest oa the debt evidenced by the Note and any prepaymcnl aod late chargu due u.adcr lhc Note. WASHINGTON•Singlc Pamity-FNMA/nlL\IC UNIFORM INSTil:UMENT Form JG4I '''° (pa,,e I of SJ Doo 0134 (Q.4.Vf) FPS564-t 0 \ ; ' I I I I l "1 1 ! . I .. ' I 2. Funds for Tases a.nd lmW"DOce. Subject tu applicable law or to a written waiver by Leader. Borrower aball pay to Lender on lbc day monlhJy payments arc due under the Note, unlil the Note is pnid in full. a sum (·Funds") for: (a) yearly taxes and ~meats which may attain priority over lhis Security lnslrumcot as a lien on the Property; (b) yearly leasehold payments or ground rents on the Property, if aar. (c) yearly hazard or property lnsurancc premiums; (cl) yearly flood la.swancc premiums. if any; (c) yearly mortgage insurance premiums, if any; nnd (f) any sums payable by Borrower to Lender, in accordnncc with the provisions of paragraph 8, i.o lieu of the payment of mortgage Wwancc premiums. Tbe&c items arc called ·Escrow Items.• Leader may, at any lime, collect and bold Funds in an amouat not lo exceed the maximum amount a lender for a fodcrnlly related mortgage loan may require Cor Borrower's escrow account under the federal Real Estate Settlement Proccdwcs Ad of 1974 as amended from time to Lime, 12 U.S.C. § 2601 ct "'I· C-RESPA·), unlc.ss another law that applica to the Funds sets a lesser amount. U so, Leader may, al any time, coUcd. and bold Funds in DD amount not to exceed the ICMCr amount. Lender mny estimate the amount of Funds due oa the basd of current data and reasonable cstimalcs of expenditures of future Esaow Items or otherwise ha accordallcc with applicable law. The Funds shall be held in an lmtitution whose deposits arc insured by a federal agency, instrumentality. or entity (including Lender, if Leader is such nn institutiua) or in nny Federal Home Loan Bank. Leader sb411 apply the Funds to pay the Escrow Items. Lender may not chnrgc Borrower for holding and applying the Funds, annually A11alyzing lhe escrow .account, or verifying the Escrow Items, unless Leader pays Borrower interest on the Funds and applicable law permits Leader to make such a charge. However, Lender may require Borrower lo pay a one-time cbnrgc for an iadcpcadcnt real c.stale 1.u reporting service wed by Leader in connection wilb this loau, unless applicable law provides otherwise. Unless an agreement is mode or applicable law requires intercat lo be paid, Lender shall nol be required 10 pa,)' Borrower any interest or eaminp on the Funds. Borrower and Lender may agree in writing. however, thal interest shall be paid on the Funds. Lender sh:ill give to Borrower, without charge, an an.nual accountlng of tbe Funds, showing credits and debits to the Funds and the purpose for which each debit to the Funds was made. The Funds arc pledged as additional security for all sums sccwcd by this Security Instrument. If the Funds held by Leader exceed the amounts permitted to be held by applicable law, Lender shall account lo Borrower for the excess Funds in accordance with the requiremenls of applicable law. If the amount of the Funds held by Lender al any lime is not sufficicnl lo pay the Escrow Items wbea due, Lender may so notify Bonowcr in writing. and. in such ca.sc Borrower 5hall pay to Lender the amount necessary to mnkc up the deficiency. Borrower shall make up the deficiency in no more tho1n twelve monlhly payments, al Lender's sole discretion. Upon payment in full of aU sums secured by l.hi.s Security lnstrwncn1, Lender shall promptly refund to Borrower any Funds bcld by Lender. lf~ under paragraph 21, Lender shall acquire or a.ell the Property, Lender, prior to the acquisition or sale of the Property, shall apply any Funds held by Lender at the time or acquisition or a.nle as a credit against the sums secured by this Security Instrument 3. AppllraUoa of Payments. Unless applicable law provides otherwise, a1J p.o.ymenLs received by Lender under parngraphs l nnd 2 $ball be applied: first. to any prepayment charges due under the Note; second. to a.mounts payable under paragraph 2; third, to intercat due; founh. lo principal duei and last, lo any late charges due under the Note. 4. Cbarp::s: Llells. Borrower shall pay all taxes,, assessments, charges. fines and imposition.s attributable lo the Property which may attain priority over lbis Security loslrumeol, and leasehold payments or grounds rents, if any. Bonower sbaJI pay 1hcie obligations ia the manner provided in p:irngrapb 2. or if not paid i.n that manner. Borrower shall pay them on time directly lo the person owed payment. Borrower sbnll promptly furnish ta Lender all notices of a.mounts lo be paid under this p.aragrapb. tr Borrower makes these payments directly, Bonowcr shall promptly furnish 10 Leader receipts evidencing the payment.\.. Borrower shall promptly discharge any lien which has priority over this Security Instrument unless Borrower: (a) agrees in writing to the payment of the obligation sccwed by the lien in a mmiocr acceptable to Leader; (b) contests i.n good faith the lien by, or defends against enforcement or the lien in,, legal proceedings wlucb in the Lender's opinion opcralc to prevcnl the enforcement of the lien; or (e) secures Crom the bolder of the lien an agreement satisractory to Lender subordinating the lien to this Security lastrwnent. If Lender determines that any part of the Property i, subject to a lien which may auain priority over this Security lnstrwneot, Lender may give Borrower a notice identifying the lien. Borrower shall satisfy the lien or take one or more of the actions set forth above within 10 d.o.ys of the giving or notice. 5. Haiard or Property ID..1wua.ce. Borrower sholl keep the improvements now existing or bcrCD.fcer erected on the Property insured against loss by fire. hazards. included within the term ·extended covcrngc• and llDY other hazards. including Ouotls or Oooding.. ror which Lender requires insurW1cc. This i.nswanc:c shall be maiatained ia the amounts and for 1he periods thal Lender rcquir~ The insurance carrier providing the insurance sbnll be chosen by Borrower subject to Lender's approva.1 wmch shall not be uarca.,ooably withheld. If Borrr>wcr fails lo maintain covcrngc described above, Lender may, al Lcnder"s option,. obtain coverage 10 protect Lender's rights in the Property in accordance with paragraph 7. All insurance policies aod.r .-coewa.Js shall be acceptable lo Lender and shall Ulclude a standard mortg.u;c clause. Lender shall have the right to bold lhe policies and renewals. 1£ Leader requires. Bonower shaU promptly give to Lender .all receipts or p.Ud premiums and rencwa.1 notices. In the event of los.s. Borrower shall give prompt notice to the insurance C3t'ricr nnd Lender. Leader may make prooC of loss if not made promptly by Borrower. Unless Leader and Borrower otherwise ogrec io wriliag. i.a.surancc proceeds shall be npplied to restoration or rep.o.ir of the Property damaged. if lhc rc.sloration or repair is economically feasible and Lender's securily is nol lcsscncd. JC the restoration or repair is not ecooomicaJJy feasible or Lender's security would be lessened. the imurancc proceeds shall be applied la the sums sccwcd by this Security Instrument, whether or not then due, with any excess paid to Borrower. Jf Borrower .o.bandons 1hc Property, or docs not answer within 30 days a notice from Lender that the insurance carrier ba.s offered to settle a claim, 1hen Lender may collect the insurance proceeds. Lender may u..;c the rrncced.-. to repair or restore the Property or to p.o.y sums sccwcd by this Security ln.suu.meot, whether or not then due. The 30-day period will begin when the notice is given. Unless Lender and Borrower otherwise agree in writing, any application of proceeds to prindpal shall not exlend or postpone the due date of lhe monthly payments referred to ia paragrapb.'I J and 2 or change lhe amouot of the paymenLs. If under paragraph 21 the Property i.s acquired by Lender, Borrower's right to any insurance policies a.nd proceeds resulting from d.o.m~e to the Property prior to lbe acquisition shall p.o..s.s to Lender lo the extent of the sums sccwed by this Security lnstrumcal immediately prior 10 the acquisition. 6.. Occupancy, PresenaUoa, Ma.lntenaACt:: and Protccllon of tbc Property; Borrcwu's Loan Appllca.Uoa; Leaseholds. Borrower shall occupy, establish and use· the Property as Borrower's principal rc.sideocc within sixty days aflcr the aceutioa of this Sccurily lnstrwnenl and shall continue lo occupy the Property a.s Borrower's principal residence for at least one year after 1he date of occupancy, unless Lender otherwise agrees in writing, which consent shall not be wircasonably withheld, or uaJe.u 1..~cnuating circumstances eQSt which arc beyond Borrower's control. Borrower shall oat destroy, dnmagc or impair the Properly, allow the Property to deteriorate, or commit waste on the Pr~pcrty. Bonowcr shall be in defqult U' any forfeiture WA.SIIINCl'ON·Singlc Famil,,..1-'?ilMA/tlllMC UNIFORM INSJ'RUME."rlT •·onaJ041 t/JO (pa~ 2o/ JJ Doc 11135 (04-91) FPSS&t-2 ~~--~ =""· i· -: . o• . ~ :..~1.1; \1.. --' . e ?ch ; i I \ 1 i ., .-, ' I action or procccdin.g. whether c:iviJ or aiminal. is begun thol in Lender's good faith judgment could result in fodcitw-c of the Propcr1y or othcfWUC materially impair the lien acatcd by this Security lmttumcol or Lcadcr"a accurity intcre&L Borrower mpy cm-c such a default and reinstate. as providc.d in paragrapb 18, by causing the action or proceeding to be di,misscd with a rulina: that. in Lender's good railh dctcrminatioa. precludes forfeiture of the Borrower's ialcre5t ia the Property or other material implUffllcnt of the lien acatcd by this Security lnstrumcnt or Lender's aecurity intcrcsL Borrower &hall al:;o be in default if Borrower• during the loan application process., gave materially false or inaCCW"alc information or atatcmcnt.s to Leader (or failed to provide Leader with any material information} in connection with the loan evidenced by the Note. induding. but not limited to. representations conccmiag Bonowcr'a occupancy of the Property as a principal reaidcnce. If this Security lastrumcnl is on a lcascho1d, Borrower ahall comply with all the provisions or I.he lease. If Bonower acquire., fee title to the Property. the leasehold and the fee title shall not merge unlca.s Leader agrees lo I.he merger in writing. 7. Protection of Leader's Rlabts Ill the Property. If Borr~, fails to perform the covenants and agreements contained in this Security Instrument. or there is a legal proceeding that may signilic:aatly aff'eel Lender's rigbts in the Property (such as a proceeding in ba.Dluuptcy, probate. for condemnation or forfeiture or to enforce Jaws or regulations), then Leader may do and pay for whatCYCr is acccs.sary to protect the value of the Property and Leader's rights in the Property. Leader's aelions may include paying any sums scc:urcd by a lien which has priority over this Security la.strumcnt. appearing in court, paying reasonable attorneys• recs and catering on the Property to ma.kc repairs. Although Lender may taJcc actioll under this paragraph 71 Leader doca not ha"C to do so. Ally amount.& disbursed by Lender w,dcr this puagrapb 7 shall become addltional debt of Bonawer secured by this Security Jnst,umcat. Unless Borrower and Leader agree to other terms of payment. these amounts shall bear iatcrc.sc from the date of disbuncment al the Note rate and shall be payable, with interc.s4 upon notice from Lender lo Borrower requesting paymenL L Mortga.a,e lulll"llllCeo IC Leader required mortgage imwan= as a condition of making the loan &eCW'Cd by this Security Instrument. Borro...ver shall pay the premiuma required to mnintain the mortg11gc insurance in effect. lf1 for any reason. the mortgage imurancc coverage rcqwrcd by Leader lapses or ceases to be in effect. Borrower &hall pay tha prcmium5 required to obtain Cffl'Crage subltantially equivalent to the mortgage inst&rancc previomly in effect. at a cost aubstaatially equivalent to the cost to Borrower of the mortgage insurance previomly io effect. from aa ahem.ate mortgage imwer approved by Lender. ]( substantio.lly equivaJent mortgage Ullurancc coverage is not available. Borrower shall pay to Leader each month a sum equal lo ooc-twclft.b or the yearly mortgage insurance premium being paid by Bonowcr wbeo the insurance coverage lapsed or ceased to be in effect. Lender will accept, use and rctaia these payments as a loss reserve in lieu or mortgage inaunmcc. Loss reserve payments may no longer be required, at the option of Leader. if mortgage imwancc coverage (in the amouot and for the period thal Lender requires) provided by an insurca· approved by Leader again becomes available and is obtained. Bonowcr shaU pay the premium.a required to maintain. mortgage inswaacc ill errca. or to provide a loss rcscrvc. until the requirement for mortgage insurance cods in accord.aocc with any written agreement between Bonowcr and Leader or 11.pplicablc law. 9. IIUlpectloa.. Lender or ita qcnt may make reasonable entries upon and in.sped.ions or the Property. Lender shall give Bonowcr notice at the time of or prior to an UlSpcdion specifying reasonable cause for the inspection. 10. CoadalUIDUoa.. The proceeds of any award or daim for damages.. direct or consequential. in cona.cctioa with any condemnation or other taking of any part of the Propcny. or for coovcyaacc ill lieu or condemnation,, arc hereby auigned nnd shaU be paid lo Leader. In the cvcol of a total taking of the Property, tbe proceeds ahall be applied lo the au.ms sccwcd by lhia Security Jn.strumeot., whether or nOl lhen due. with any cucss paid to Bonowcr. lo the event of a partial laking of the Property in which the fair market value of the Property immediately before the taking i.s equal to or greater than the amount of the sums secured by this Sccurit)' lnstrumcat immediately before the laking. unless Borrower and Lender otherwise agree in writing. the sums secured by this Security Instrument ahaU be reduced by the amouol of the proceeds multiplied by the following frac:tion: (a) the total amount of the sums secured immediately before the taking. divided by (b) the fair market value of the Property immediately before I.he taking. Ally balance shall be paid to Bonowcr, la the event of a ~artiaJ laking or the Property i.a which the fair market value of the Propcny immediately bc£orc the uaJdng is lc.u than the amount of the sums secured immediately before the taking. Wllcss Bonowcr and Lender otherwise ugrec io writing or unless appUca.bfe law oth~e prmidcs. the proceeds wall be applied lo the sums sccwcd by this Security lnstnUnenl whether or not the Sum5 arc then due. If the Property is ab3ndooed by Borrower, or it1 after notice by Lender to Bormwcr that the coodemnor offers to ma.kc an award or settle a claim for damages. Borrower fails to respond to Leader within 30 days after the date the notice is given. Lender is authorized lo collect and apply the proceeds. at its option. either to rC41.oratioa or repair of the Property or to the sums secured by this Security lnstrumeat. whether or not then due. Uolcs.s Lender and Borrower otherwise agree in ....,;ting. any appliCBtioo or proa:eds to priucipaJ shall not cxiend or postpone the due date of the monthly payments refcned to in parngrapbs l and 2 or change the amowir of such payments. 11. Bol'TOWU' Nol Kelmscd; Forbeanuu:e By Leader Nol a Waiver. Eueosioa of the time for payment or modification of amurtiz.ation or the sums secured by thi, Security Instrument granted by Lender to nny succe&sor in interest or Borrower shall not opcrale to release the liability of the original Bonower or Bonowcr's aucccs.son in intcresL Leader 5hall not be required to commence proccedinS"F, against any successor in interest or rcrusc to extend time for payment or otherwise modify amortization of the sums accurcd by this Security lmtrumenl by reason of ony demand made by the original Bonowcr or Borrower's successors in intcrcsL AtJy forbearance by Lender in exercising any right or remedy shall not be a waiver of or preclude the exer05C of any right or remedy. 12. Suca:sson a.od As.sip., Bound; Johll QDd Several LlabUUy; Co-signers. The covenants and agrcc:mcats or this Security tn.o;;lnl.m.eat wU bi.ad and benefit the succcs.sors ODd a.s:si.gm of Leader and B01Towcr .. subject to the provisiom of paragraph 17. Borrower's coavcaants and ogr-ecmeats sh.ill be joint and several. Any Borrower who c;:o-signs this Security hutru.meol bul dOC5. 001 accute the Note: (a) is co-signing this Security Instrument only to mortg:tgc. grant and convey th.11 Borrower's interest in the Property under the terms of this Security lnslru.meot; (b) is not personally obligated to pay the sums secured by th.i.s Security Instrument; and (c) agrees that Leader and any other BorTOYt'Ct may agree to CJaend. modify, forbear or make any accommodations with regard to lbc terms of lhis Security Instrument or the Note without that Borrower's CODSCDI, 13. LoaA Cluu'ges. If the loan secured by this Security lmttumr.ot is subject to a law which sets maximwn loan charges,, and I.bat law is finally interpreted so that the interest or other loan charges collected or to be collected ill connection with the loan cxcccd the permitted limits. then: (a) any such loan charge shall be reduced by the ai:noWll necessary to reduce the charge to the pcrmiucd limit; and (b) any sums already collected Crom Borrower which cxcccdcd permitted limits will be refunded to Bonowcr. Leader may chomc to make this refund by reducing the principal owed under the Note or by making a direct payment to Bonowcr. If a refund reduces principal, the reduct.ion will be treated as a partial prepayment without any prepayment du.rgc under the Nole. l WASIIINGI'ON..Sln&lc Pam1ty-FNMA/t1UMC UNI.FORM IN:tTAUMENJ' Fon11 )04I '/'°(pate~ of SJ Doc tlt31 (o+DIJ FPSS&f.3 -~~. -, ::". -.";. -. -~.-. -~ ·-~ r·---,..,,,.~ ~ ' . . . ···-' • ~"·"'~""-U -• • • = • --• ,:~------· --·- ! \ ~ l ' ' i I j ! j ' •j • / \ i 1 e j f J ~.~· q ·--~· ·.:!It L_ . ..:. _o_ --------·---------- ' ,, .. I ' 14. NotJce!!I. Any notice to Borrower provided (or in this Security Instrument shall be given by deliYcriag it or by malling it by f&rSt da&s mail u.nlcss applicable law requires use or another method. The notice &hall be directed to the, Property Address or any other adW'C.U BorTowcr desiga.arcs by notice to Lender. Any notice to Lender sball be given by rant clu.1 mail to l.cndcr's addtcu stated herein or any other addtess Leader designates by notice to Borrower. Any notice provided for in thl,, Sccwity Instrument sbal~ be deemed to have been given lo Borrower or Leader when given as provided in this paragraph. JS. Govc:mlag Law; Snuablllty. This Sccurily Jnstrumcnl sbnll be governed by federal Jaw and the law of the jurisdiction in which the Property is located. lo the event tb:at any provi.1ion or dau.sc of this Security Instrument or the Note conflicts with applicnblc law, such conflict sholl not afTCCI. other provisions of this ScCW'ity Instrument or the Note which can be given effect without the confiding provision. To this cad the provisions of this Security lns\J'Umcnt and the Note arc declared to be teverablc. 16. Bornnftr'a Copy. Bonowcr shall be given one confonncd copy of the Nole oad of I.his Security lnstnameaL 17. Tramrer of the Proputy or a Bc.adlclal lakn:st la Borrower. Jf all or any part of the Property or any interest ia it is sold or transfcrTcd (or if a beneficial interest in Borrower is sold or l.l'ansfcrred a.ad Bonowcr is not a nalW11l person) without Lender's prior wriuea coascnt. Lender may. at its option. require immediate payment lo full of all sums secured bythis Security lnstrumcal. However. this option shall not be exercised by Lender if exercise is prohibited by federal law o.s of the dale of this Security In.strum.cal. If Lender acrciscs this opUon, Lender shall give Bonowcr notice of acceleration. Tbc aoticc shall provide a period of ool less 1hnn JO days from the date the nolicc is delivered or mailed within which Borrower mts5l pay all sums secured by this Security Instrument. If Borrower fails lo pay these :.was prior to the expiration of this period, Lender may invoke any rcmedie& pcrmiucd by this Security Instrument without fwlhcr notice or demand on Borrower. 18. Borrower's Rlgbt lo Rdmtate. JC Borrower meets ccnaia conditions, Borrower shall ha\1:: the right to have enforcement of this Security [nstrumenl discontinued at nny time prior to the earlier of: (a) S days (or such 9tber period as applic:ible law may specify for reinstatement) before sale of the Property punW1Dl lo any power of sale contained in. this Security Instrument; or (b) ent.Jy of a judgment cnforc.ing Lhh Security Instrument. Tbose conditions arc that Bonowcr: (a) pays Lender all swns which then would be due under this Security Instrument a.ad the Note ns it no acceleration had occurred; (b) ewes any default or BD)' other covcoanlS or agreements; (c) pays all expenses incwrcd in enforcing this Security Instrument. including. but not limited lo, reasonable attorneys• fcc.s; and (d) takes such action as Lender may rcason:i.bly require to assure that the lien or this Security lnstnament. Lenders rights in the Property and Bonowcr•s obligation to pay the sums secured by this Securily Instrument sb.n.11 continue unchanged. Upon reinstalemcat by Borrower. this Security tn.,ttumcnt and the obligations secured hereby .shall remain fully effective u.s il no nccclcralion bad occurred. However, this right 10 rei.nslalc &hall not apply ia the cnsc of acceleration under paragraph 17. 19. So.le of Note; Cbnage of Loan Sc:n1ccr. Tbc Note (1r a partial interest in the Note (togcl..bcr with this Sccwity Instrument) may be sold one or more Limes without prior nolicc to Borrower. A sale may result in a change in the entity (known as the •1.oan SeMccr•) that coUeels monthly payments due under the Note and t.his Sccwity Instrument. There Dlso mny be one or more changes or the Loan Servicer WU'Clatcd to a sale of the Note. If there is a change of the Loan ScMccr0 Borrower will be given written notice of the change in accordance wilh paragraph 14 above and applicnble law. The notice will st.ale the name and addrcs.s of the new Loa.o Service, and the address lo which payments sbouJd be made. The notice will :o.ho t'ontain :iny other information required by applicable law. 20. Hazardous SubstDnca. BorTower shall not cause or permit the presence, we, disposal. storage. or rclCllsc or any Hazardous Substances on or in the Property. Borrower sbaU nol do. nor allow anyone else to do, anything affecting the Prop;rty that i.s in violation of any Environmental Law. The precccding two scntena::.s shall not apply to lbe pracncc. use. or storage on the Property of smnll quantities of Ha.z.udaus Substances that a,c generally recognized lo be appropriate to normal residential uses and to maintenance of the Property. Bonower shall promptly give Lender written notice of any investigation., claim. demand. lawsuit or other action by any govcrnmenW or regulatory ngcncy or private party involving the Property and any HllZUdous Substance or Environmenlal Law of which Borrower bas actual knowledge. If Borrower Icarus. or is notified by w:ay govcmmcntnl or regulatory authority, 1hat any removal or other remediation of any Hazardous Subs1aocc afl'ccting the Property i.s necessary, Borrower shall promptly take all ncCCMary remedial ad.ions in accordance with Envirownenlal Law. A5 used in this paragraph 20, ·Hazardous Substances· arc those substances defined ns toxic or hazardous substanec.5 by Environmentu.J Law and the following substances: gn.solinc, kerosene. other flammable or toxic petroleum products. toxic pc.slicidcs and bc:rbicides. vohalile solvents, materials containing nsbcstos or formaldehyde, .D.Dd radioactive materials. As used in this paragraph 20. ·Environmental Law> melll\5 federal laws nnd laws of the jurisdiction where the Property is loc;atc:d lb.at relate 10 health, safety or cnviro11ntcntal protection. NON-UNIFORM COVENANTS. Borrower and Lender further covenant and ugrcc as follows: 21. AcceleraUoa: ReJDedJcs. Lender shall &Ive noUce to Borrower prior to ottderuUoa rollowtq Bol'T'0Wff"1 breach or any covcDADt or agreement In thb SKurlty lnstnameat (but not prior to a.ccderadoa under paragraph 11 unlais applicable law proYldes otherwise). 11ae noUce shall sptt.11',r. (a) lbe default; (b) the nctJoa ffQ.Ulrcd to CUR the default; (c) o date. nol less &ha.a JO dayw from tbe date tbe notice b give.a to Bol'TO'WU", by which the default must be cured; ADd (d) that radlure to cun: the detu.ult oa or before the date apcc.lllcd la the aoUce rna)' rt5Ull In aettleratJoo or the sums .secured by this Security ln!itrumeal and aale ot the Property at public auction al a date not less lbaD llO days la the future. 'Jbe aotJce shall rurther Inform Bol'T"OWCI' or the rig.bl to nln.statc aftu caccrleratloa, lbe right to brtng n court aclloca to ,use rt tbe aon-cxlsteoce or u default or any other defense of BorTOWt:r to acaleratlon and sale. and any other maltua reqUlftd lo be Included In the notice by nppllable low. It the dd'auJt b not cun:d on or before the date sptdfled. ID the notice, Lender al Us option mny require lmmi:d.late payment In fuU of all sums secured by t.bls Security Instrument 'R'lthout furt.ber demand aad may Invoke the pO"WCr or sale nnd any other r1:medles permitted by applicable law. I.ender shaU be entUJ~ to eolll:Cl all apcnscs lncurTYC! la pursuing the remed.Je.., provided IA thb pnrugnapb 21, Including. but not Umlt.ed to, rra5oa.able attor11eyw' recs and costs or tllle evidence. rr Lender lnvoka the J>O'lftr or sale, Lender sboll pve written aotJce to T.-ustee or the occurrence or an eveut of dd'oult wad of Lender"s dccUoa to cau.se the Prope.rly to be sold. Truslee a.ad Leader shall tab such action "8,llf1llng aotJce or sale and shall give such aotJ~ to llorrolftr 1111d to olhcr penoa.s as appllcable law may require. Aller the lime n:qulred by applicable law ond an.er pubUcaUon of the notJce or sale, Trusttt, without dCIDIUld on Borrower, shall sell the Pro~rty at publlc aucUoa to the blgbe,t bidder at the ll:ne and place and uadcr the tum, dalgnalcd la Ille aollce or sale In one or more parcels and la any order Tnasttt dctum.Jncs. Trustee mD)' postpone sale or the Property ror a period or periods permitted by applicable Jaw by public aaaounc:ement at the lime a.ad place Dxed In lbe nolke of sale. Lender or It, dcslgntc may purchase the Property at GD)" sale. W,\SIIINGJ"ON.Singlc Pamily-.'NMA/nlLMC UNJFQRM INSTRUMENT •orm JG&l 9/to (pai,t 4 of SJ DoG #137 (04-11) FPSSM-4 i l ' 'i ; ·' ! ! \ \ \ ., ! ;; ' I ., ., 1 ~ ·l I l ! ) i ,, l I •' ., I Tnultee ahAII ddlwr to tbe purcbaN:r Trwitml'a deed coaveyina th= Property ~tboat C1IIY CO\'t:D,llll,l or \?DITQDly, nprased or lmpllal. 'Ille redlz>la la tbe 'l'nlstee'o deed sbDII be primD l'ade m.ie-or Ille tratb aftbe alutaDeDla mode tbpda. Tn,ala, sllall apply Ille pi I, of tbe sale ha Ille foll....tatJ anlen (o) IO all ell)rmOe8 or tbe 8'llc, IDdDdlDII, bat Dot llmllcd ~ n:asoa:mble Tnmtee'a cmd a.UDl'Deya' reea; (b) to all aamn DeCIU"e.d by Ua1o Secart.ty laatnlmalt; oad (c) onyea:aa to lbe person or puooaa lep11y eatllled to It or to the clerk olthe aupaior coart oldae C01111ty la whlcll the sale took place. :zz. --Upon paymcot or all auma secured by this Security IDatrumcot, Lender aba1I requc:at Trustee IO rccoavey the Property and &hall suncnclcr this Scauity Instrument nnd all notes cvidc.aciag debt accured by thia Sccwity Jnstrumcnt to Trustee. Trustee &hall rcconvcy the Property without warranty to the pen.on or pcnam legally entitled to iL Such pcrsoa or pen.om ahal1 pay any rec:orclalioa. costs. Leader may charge auch pcraon or peRODS a (cc (or rcc:onvcyiag the Property, but onl/ if tho fee ia paid to a third party (such a& the Trustee) for ICfflcc& rendered and the cbargiag of the fee ia permitted under applicable law. 23. Sabadtllte Tru1ez. In ac:cordancc with applicable lo.w, Leader may &om time to time appoint a suceeuor tru&tec to a.ay Trustee appointed hereunder who bu ccmcd to act. Without convcyaacc of the Property, the aucc:caaor truatcc aball &uccccd to all the title,, power and dutica mnf'urcd upon Trustee bcrcin and by applicable law. Z4. Uae of Pr-opaty. Tbc Property ia not uacd principally for agricultw-al or farming purpose&. 25. Riden to tll1D SemrtQ' lDalnU:DeaL U one or more ridcn arc executed by Borrower a.nd recorded together with this Security Ia.strumcnt. tbe am:naata and agrcemenla of each aucb rider ab.all be incorporated into ,md ahall amend and supplcmeat tho CO\'CD&DII and agrcemcata or thi& Security Instrument III iC the rider(•) were a part or lhia Security lmlrumcat. (Check applicable box(ea)J D Adjw1ablc Ralc Rider O Graduated Payment Rider 0 Balloon Rider 0 Olhcr(a) (specify) O Condominium Rider D Planned Unit Dcvclopmeol Rider 0 Rate Jmpnwc.meol Rider 0 1-4 Family Rider 0 Biw=ldy Poymcnt Rldu 0 Second Home Rider BY SIGNING BELOW, 8orTawer accepts and agrees lo the term.a and COftD&Dll contained in pagca 1 through S of this Security Instrument ad in any ridcr(a) executed by Borrower and recorded with iL 532-42-4595 ---------------=c_(Scal) .. BorTOWer Social Security Number ____________ _ Social Security Nu.mbcr ____ t.~r~n1i]~-J/=--1 \1..,., '··-~ STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING Couoly as: <1.~·o.; . l -1,,,.',, W."c . On this ~ -L,C., day or JULY , 19 95 • bdo,c me the uaScraigocd, PubUoJ in and for the Slate of Washington., dulyC"Ommisaioocd and sworn, pcnonaUy appeared DAVID A. NYBLOM AND DEBRA L. ALBISO to me known to be the iodividual(a) dcaaibcd LD and wbo executed the foregoing instrument. and ack.aowlcdgcd to me that THB't signed and sealed the said imtru.meot as THBXR Cree and volunblt)' act and deed,. Cor the mca and purpoacs therein mentioned. WITNESS my band and official &ea.I aflltcd the day d year in thia ccrtificat above written. My Commiuioo apircs: 1/1/97 D raiding al: Monroe REQUEST FOR RECONVEYANCE To Trustee: The undcn.ig:acd is the holder of the note or note5 5CCW'cd by this Deed of Tnast. Said note or ootcs, together with n1I other iudcbtcdacss 'sc.curcd by this Deed of Trust. b.t,vc been paid ill rulL You arc hereby direclcd to cancel said note or noces and this Deed of Trua.t, whicb arc delivered. hereby, and to rccoovcy, without wananty, all the estate now bcld by ynu under this Deed or Trust to the person or persons legally en Li tied thereto. Dale:------------- WASIUNGl'ON.siqle Pam!J],,F!llllA/>lllMC UNIFORM INSlllUMENl' Fore -Pf'O (pa&C S of J) ..... f I ; . " .. = . ·"-'•1' ~ .:'. ..J:&':16 q f ' ' 0 - THE EI\ST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF TUE SOUTIIEAST QUARTER OF SECT:ION 14 • TOWHSllt:P 2:J NORTH, Rl\NCE 5 E1\.ST, WILlJ\MttTTE HER.lDIAN. IN KING COUNTY, WAS11INQTON; EXCEPT TllJ\T PORTION OF SI\ID EAST 111\.LF OF TIIE NORTHWEST QUI\RTER OF TUE S0tn'IIBI\ST QUI\RTER OF SAID SECTJ:Otl l.4 DBSCRIDED hS FOLLOtfS1 DEGINUIHG AT THE SOU'nlEJ\ST CORNER OF SAID EI\ST HJ\LF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF TJIE SOUTHEAST QUI\RTER AS TUE POINT OF TRUE BEOINNINQ 1 TllENCE NORTH 25•21• El\ST 523.99 FEET ALONG THE &l\ST LINE OF SAID EAST IIALF OF fflE NORTIIWEST QUI\RTER OF TIIE soUTlrEAST QUARTER: TltENC:E NOR.TU 00•07•59• WEST 653,61 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF TUE SOUTHEAST QU.I\RTERt TIIEHC::E SOUTH o•27'0S" WEST s2s.a2 FEET TO THE SOtn"II LINE OF Sl\.:ID EJ\ST,llALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUMTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUl\RTSR; TIIEHCE SOtrnl 00•17• JS"' EAST 653 .84 FEET ALONG TtlE SOUTH LINE OF SAID EAST HJ\LF OF TUE UORTUWEST QUARTER OF TIIE S0t.r1'1161'1.ST QUARTER TO THE TRUE POINT OF SF.GINNING: J\ND EXCEPT COUHTY nol\Ds . --·. ·--··-·······. ' = ·~· ... King County Credit Union 801 2nd Ave,.• SUite 100 Seattle, WA 98104 l<l,NG(OUNTY P:Dll'Olf UDIDD ·~·~ DIWD> A, NYBLCM AND DEBRA L. ALBISO Gr.anree<s): KING COUN1"Y CIE>:I.T UN.ICRII Deed of Trust Home Equity Uoe of Credit Lcspl °""=npcion: PORTia. NORIHWEST QUARTER OF 'niE s::r.trHEA.ST QUAR'lER OF SECTia-1 14 • 'IOIIEKIP 23 NOR'lH, RAN.ES EAST. AaaorUor's l'ropeny Tu..._, ot Acxoun1 No., l.42305-9009-04 CHICA~m~ INS. CO REF#/ / t,~ ......:;- THJS DEED OF TRUST is~ on -=-~§!'P""~t~a~·~•~ea,,r,,,.l~2e,z,, ~-====-=-~==----· 09 __ .,. DAV.XO A, ~ AND Dm3RA L. ALDI.SO, HUSBAND AND WIFE --------==a:=-::,,,.-::=:==-:=::=:=:c(hen:::inafter n:fr:rn:d 11, l.ndwiJually •~ ~ly. :u UIC CONe:it'I nu~· requite. :u -c~or·) to CiICAGO TITLE INSURAN:E CXMPANY ..,....._ ~ t.s 1800 cal.umb.ia center, 701 Fifth Avenue, seattle, WA 98104 l"'TN:SU:c"), '°" ~ bendk oL KING COU1''TY CREDIT UNION', 11.s ~ and :u.siwu,, whoec:-:addn:v. ~' 801S..-n>nd A,·~nUC', !iUir.t 100. !'icaltlc, Wa.V)ing1un 98104-1510 ("Rc:ncfld.lry"). GranlCN' does Mrrby jltVII. convey and -alftm to Truscec. in """'· woth p,we-r oE -i.e. !he> .:ibr:N,e, described pro~y loc.a1ed in 1hc-Coun1y of Kin , Suit of WashU'lgK>n which t,a,. 1hr ~ :addrcu of 13606 158th Aye. SE, Repton, WA 98059 _. 1U!fC1heT -;th Ci) all 1mpn:wcmenu. bul.ldlnRJ Of' MnKtVrn of an1· n.ttun: wtu1111,uo:v\."I', now or ~(leT ~ffl on Lli.: propeny. CliJ all flXlun:-s. irKludlnA all ptumbmK. hr,UinJ,C, ai, c,.·onchliomns and \~lil,11in1.4 c<quirn10.-n1. n<.-,.-he'rr:af1('r k>c;iitec.J under. on Of above 1~ property. Oi11 all rla;tus, pnvilrjlCi. renl:l, ,oyalue,,., minc-r•I. oil and~ nW'L" :ond pn.-11,1. tc-nrs. Mredn.i.ments. riii:l"H.o-ol- ••.-al'. ea5oef'neNS. appenda~. appunc:nanco.. Of rip.man riflhb now Uf lu.'l"Clflc:r hdonging rn-in ;my Vir.lY appertaining 10 I.he J'>"Of""l'tY, and (Iv) all of Gr;111111~s rlW,1. lklo a"'1 mten-,,t in and In a~ :'lll'eCU, righ~i(.-..y. alley<I nr 0Qr1P" of land ,...,,... or ~after adjomin11 th<-n:co. lnclud.lnfl any ~~ and addilK">f\." 10 an,,· n/ 1hir! fr>n:'gt>inK All o( 1M fon,,gotna is coU«uve!i,· ~fcmed u, In 1hi.., l>ecd ol Trusr: ;a.., 1he "Propcny.- THF. PROPF.RTY IS NOT I 1~F.n PNINC:IPAU Y FOIi AGRJ~tJL nrRAL OR fAR."-IINO PURPOSES Tius ~ o/ TruA i.1 ffff die! pur-p,n,se of wcurtnA the p11ymall al all inddlla.1-. indUWng principal. l~Cl'NI, Adv2tw:cs (U hertem~flcr defined I, :all ochcT amounts, fln.1m:c Chaf"R'CS, payntenU and r-n,imlL~ d...._.. 11nd 1hc pcrirK1rnonc:e of all oblli;atiolu Out Or:1m0f' no..-or here2fter ~ Ucneflciary, wldn lh•s Drcd ot· TRl.lil :i,md 1nldo:r 11-c,."t..-r,ain agn:ernn,1 i,rrwo:-rn,n~ Ur.inmr's Open· e11d H-Equicy Cttdi1 Pbn cncc.!Td imo ~n Gr.antOf" and Beneficiary of CYen d:r.1e, ~....,;u, ("A~m"). lnrludinR ail clllCftSK>f'IS, ~-~" and modtfic:alion., ~Cail of sucl1 ol>t1fl,IIUOIU 1..,;nH hc,•c,n:.ftcr n:fCtTI..-J 10 as 1hc ·nebt"I TIM' A~ has~ c,.TI."dlr hmil of$ 40 000 eOO u~ lh-: limil b m<tt".ded and .t nOlice of :web tnc:Te"o1....,. u. re~ in 1~ OIH<:e ol 1M Cnunry Audiuw in the coumy a.-hcro: lhl~ Occd of Trusc h;u, l.>ecn ~ordc-u. This Deed al TN.II i$ tw die pu,pc-c al ae..'Uring • ~•ilwinal cndil lo;,.n ~nd shaD secure nor only ~y exi:sung i.nddxcdr-5 ~~~.~~~~-ano.~r~-cara "";:;!'~~fk~:~~~7.e°'" ... ~bce,an::c .:·u~=.:' ~~ rtade °" •he dare .,,1 lhe ~ of lhb Drm ol Tr\l:'Q, .ahhc,ulfh 1hcn-m.a,· hl-nn adr.lnc'CII ~ 21 the time ol lhe e,cl!'C\IDOl'I of lhi" ~ or Truss .and allhouflh there ma,-· be no indchlcdnt...._.. ........... R."d ~ outsl:ulthng :.11 the Tllnc any advance is made Titc Ucn of this Deed ol TN.111 shall he valid as 10 all Uldel'Xcdnel.• ~ ho=n:hy, indudina fun,n-~~. trom ~ time ol lu llling fo.· r..-c:ordina in I.he OfficC' ol the C<.>unrr AuJllor tn lhc .:ouruy in whid1 lhc rn'fl'('rty u loc-ared. nw: coca.I amou.ni of ~ i•a:urcd ~-tT'lil}' lncrea,e Of~ from time 10 time. but the 1raal unpaic.l habnc-e ul 1nJriJi!N:incss ~ he~· llnduding Jisbun.cmomu ""'"hkh Bcncf1t."lU)' m;ay ma.lie undrT lhis lkcl.l of TRL•, die A~ ur :an,,• othff documenl with re,.pe,ct lhtft,of) a, an}· one wnc ouuundinM shAU no1 ~ thr cNdk hmil llC'I fc.lh ahrwr pb. inccrelll and ble: C'h:tr,tel :&C'CTUinK d'lcRon and any ~ or di:sbuncmmu which Uendlaa,y nvy ma.Ice pursuant to the tl!'rnp of Ou, (>cw:,d u/ Trwit. lhc ~ or any ocher docufflC'flll With n:spco UlCftlo. indudJn11 bur f1CJI Unuted to p;avment ror casca. ape,."UJ e ow.nu. or lnsurana-°" the Propeny and lhc uuc~ °" such disbunemeng. Thb Deed ol Tnm • lnlended to and ahaU he ¥11lid and ha"c ~ ~ all aub&cquenl l>CnP and ~-includin,c jQ,fU1orf llo:ru, ~ ta.~ and ~ levied ._... 1he Pmpeny not 'Y\!I due and paya~. to lhc e"Xt~ ol lhe maJUmum ;,lfflOUOI ~red ~·-The unpaid halan,.,e n/ 1hr, n.·vulvU'B ~• ban ma,-· a, cauln W1'IC'l be .&cru. A :iero balan«-does not •~to= the rcvol\inl a'Cdic ban or Benelici.&ry"• ohlipion fo a6-n,;,,-fund.a to GnNar. l"llcftfutt, the lien of lhl'I o-d ol Trva will RmaVI In full fora: and cffCCI nrJIWilhaandina any -. babr.c•. . tili . ,;;jJ} :.I DE.1!:D OF TRUST (cont.lnued) A. REPRESENTATIONS Gran1or hettby repttserns 10 Bnleflduy as follows: 1. Valldlty~~Ooc:.-nlD. bl The esrcutlon, drllwlty and pnfonnar-by GranKW ol 1he' A~. thb ~ ol Trwlll aM all othe-r dr:w:unwnu -' lnR.nun.ents now o, hen:sAtt fumlshed 10 Bendldary co~ Of ~re pmymnsc cl 1hr Dct. (thr 'Senlriry Documents'). :and I.he bonowtna C"Yklcnccd by 1M AftJft'ffWfll. wW new viola1e any Pffl"uk>n ol ia-. any ordcT of any o:oun or odlft' llR'ff'C'Y n/ f&O'V'l!tnmft'II. or any ~JPH'C', lndentuie. 1ruS11 a~ or Olhff il'IIMNmt'nl co whk-h o.,.nc, .. "" • p;ony UI" hy whkh Gnn1nr lW any of c.nncar·s propeny ls hound. or be In iconfUct .wiiih. or wtll resull In a makrilol 1..-ch uf cM CURMilute (with tllw mxK.-....• and/a,, lapar ol time) a dd'aull undr:r any .uch mons;aF, lndrn1un:. IN.SI a~ , .. nthcr lnMrurncni, or -..11 in 1hc <.-n:alinn or lmpos;lion of any Uen, o:'h::lrp or ~-o( any naNft" ~ upon :my nl Gr.anuw"5 JWOP1CffY or IUIICU, e,rC'qlll u con1anpb1ed t,,. d~ ptOVbk>ns of 1he Security Don.unen&a: and fbl ~ Securiry Docunwnts. a., and when C'XC'CUled ;1.nd del~ hy Grancor, CONIIIIIIC! IM' legal. v.lllkl and NncJ1na ohUp1Jons ol Gr.amor In a«of'danctr With meir JCSpoC"li"' lfffflS 5'.lbt«t 10 applkablC!' bankNr,uy :and tnanl~ laws. ~-oct.r Inlow den AU uchn infunn:.tinn, n:pun.11. pap:n ;,ind dabl ~ ro Rcnrf,cia,y, or co lkncf'ociuy'• lqpl ~~I. with n:spc'd w Granfur, tho:~·. or ,J.., ln;,,n C.."Yd1,:n,;cd hy the S..-.;1Ki1y ,~ an,, M:cur.11c and C'Un'CC1 In ..,I tnal~ fapcl'C'I.$ and comrkte 1niiol'•r .. l.'Offlplclcncu fflllY IIC' l'ICC'e'.'Ul'Y In IJh"C' Rendkiary II tnJe :and acouate knowt,;dgc ol Ow Mlhfect maner ;l. Tide-OranlOI' has Jll)Od •nd 11111~ble-1ide in f~ simple 10 1he Propcny IR!e and d,r;ar ol :iill e,ncumhr:ancr,. 11."XCl:'J'C for encwnhf'anoo!:s ol rec.onl as ot the datr ol 1his Dc'c(J of Tnut. Cr.vuot wtll JW'e'X'~ M Uttr 10 1hr Prope~· :and -111 ,~, o>vl.-n:an1 :and defend du: Mme to lknC'flaary :and will fon~vff covcnaf'II and de'fcnd the ,~lldJry and prioriry of 1hc-ltn1 of 1h:.. ~ ul TR"I. ... UllglleJon.. n-ill nu1 now pcndina or 1hn:ak:ncd "P....t or •lhxlinR lM Ptopcffy. NW. 10 lhc knowk:d,.c GI c;,-,u'llot', is 1hcre l.-ontc.-mpblcd, any ac."'liotl, su11 or pn.x:e,c,cllna 111 l;aw or in «fW1y or hot' Of' bd'ort' any adm9ni.'1Cnllive D.,tC'ncy which, 1f adversely dt!-t~fflftl. woukJ imr-P' ur ,advcrsdy 111Tca the value or opcr.11iun 11( I.he prgpcny. 'S. II~ laolkalnlfy-. On1Nor shall indcmnit,.· and hokl Urnrflc:bry h.:lrrnleM :again.U :and rmm any and all i...-. .,, .... danURC, dalm cw <'lllflCtue Ondud.n111-wttho\A llmJuOon. any and all :mom,ey"·• fees or CllJIIC'TUI."' vii lillpurm) ,ncurn.·d ,., .. uff"L·n:d by Rc-ndldary un KCOUfll ol 11> the tocauon"" the Pmprny of any chrmk"llb. 111111t:rial. alhlq_ana:, .,, cun&affUnan1 (m<;h.11.iintc. wilhou1 l1ml1:a11on. oU. p,an,ieum p«>ducu. ~ urea, fo,rm:aldchydc. fQClm lnaulation. h:u:.;ndou.• w:u.tc ancVnl' tnxic wa...,c). 1hc pn."MTKe ,w Mon~ o( whkh or the c,i;;posurc 10 whkh 1.-ptOhlhlll.-d. llmltffl, or n=((Ubted by an,,. lcdcr.al, .-.taw. '"°'"'"'Y· rqpon:al, n, lncal !l(JVenunental unil. 11~ Of" authority. 01'" tll'hk:h prr,encc-. !11Uf2,ac". ,., cxpl.llSII~ m:ay ,-.-.-a har.>nl In h ... -.. 11h and .uf,."t),•, Of' (ii) I.he f•~ hy Gn;nmr « any pno, DWnel' Of" OC'CUl)IIN ol 1hc l"rflJ'K""Y 10 ~°'>mply 1111<ifh :an,· applK·:shk r ... , •• i...-r .. 1. 111..a1e. county. l'eRklNII ex loc:JI environrncnul laws, n!'Kl,lblinns. and coun or admlnlscr.ui-unkno B. ADDmONAL COVENANTS Un1II the enLi~ Od'll llhall have tw,cn p,11KI In fu!I, Cranuw ~·,.,,· ... ""TDnL• ::mcl aJfR."I:>' ~ (olk .... -..• f1 l'lryulcnl of~ Gninlffl" 51"1:1111.iml.'ly pa)· aod dbcharxc-1hc Debi: or .In)· """ 1hcrrof in ac:c:nn:bnc:11!' w11h lc.'l'flUo and nsndihun. ... nl the A~n1. lhb, Deed r,I TN5l. :and Ille 5«'urtrf Dcw:urnents. 7. P1rymen1 ol'T--and A men-. 0Dn10f" ,hall duly JUY .and dLM."ha~, ........ ,.._ IU h,: p;,Od :.11n.J Ji.,c;:ha,,ca.l .. 11 n:-.il e,'l,C.:IIC and ~I Pf'OPC"Y laJl:C'S and n1hcr UXc:I and ~. puhhc ,., i,riv:il<:: Yr,':IICI' :1nd ~ r.,~ anc.J ch:aqte'I; all ('J(hC!'1' ~I ot non~mmcnuil chaf'R" apptk'llhk' fO !he Pffl,pr:'n)~ any into.._ or Cl1lillll o.-pcnahia •tlh ~ 10 any of Ow fofCA(Kn1111, and cha~ for any _,,, O'I' oar,NmM.-nt m:atno.lnc(I for &he:-hencfh of 11w Propeny~ ll'fflCr.1,1 and •pe,c:lal, ordinary or c,un1ordlnary. f..._n or unfon."M."I. ... , uf any kind .;and -•un:e wha~·er which nuy al anv lin>e prior lo ot ;a(lc.'1' c,.;t'<\.ltkln nl lhL• DN.'d of Trus1. he a.~. l~·ic:d. cw inlf"O-"Cd upon 1hc Proprny or o,e rcni or lnccme l'CCC'lved 1hcre-hom. r,r :,ny U"<' nr occupaOC')" t~. A.II c,/ IIM.' t,nqplin11 """' hcrcln.lflcr .. --o11«1Jvdr ~,en,ed 10 a.•·~.· Gr.aruot" shall r,rovklc.' lle'ftc.'fic:bry -uh s.;u&slantll')' pn.,o( u/ payn,o,n1 ,,1 any A,,.,,c-ncnls within lcn ( 10) d.lVII of d'1'C d;He ;In)• sue.TI A:w1.r:1,1111C"O,... .1n: d~. In 1hr: c.-,.·rnl l..ir:s.nlc.>4' f;atls en 1imely pay :an)' ,..,.._..., ~llll:'N.'I. hcndlclary ~)·. hu1 -.hall "°' ~ obliA,11ed 10, m:akc such pa)"TnC"nl.'I ancl :my amounts'° pak.l ~ l\cnclkiary llh:all ~°O'l"\Mitutc-Adv;irnc:c,i in .u:cord.incc .... 11h Par.1w,aph 16 hc,,n:,of. R Hazaftl 1-. Gr:anlOI'" Ml.all kt'efl ff unpro,.·e,nrma now t.""-i..'lltniC or hl.'R':Jf!C'T c:n:'\'ICd nn rhc Pmpcn)' ira.urcd a~inM los.• ~-fin:. h:u..ards included "'il.hln ~ lrf'l'II ·exu•n<.k."d ,:o,.~r.1JIC. • ;one.I .tn)' ,..h,,..,. h:1.r.in.1 ... few ... -hto:1, flcno.'("ci.:lry """l"irc,e. in.-r.1oc:e. U I.he .,,opclt)' i."' IOC'.ilcd in an ;an:a de,,lgna1cd ~· 1hc l>iro:o.,cw •ol the f'nlo:r .. 1 P.n-."'}Cl,·••:y Aw--ncy ..,. a ,.,...=ial nC><d hll.Zald nrea. Gr.ml,,.. .114TC"<..,. 10 ohuin Federal t1ood ln.'lUnll"ll.~ 10 1hc elfll•n1 ll\JC'h ,ruur.m<"I:! ~• n::quirt."f.l f,w the 1cnn oldie IUlln and fN I.hr full iNkhC:o:Jnl.-M o( !he loan lnsur.11'1("c polk:11."'f ~:all he m:alnta,nc'd In the :imnuni,, :.snc.l fnr lhc 1"'-'ffl)WI, 1ha1 lk:nd"ocbry requiR"I "The il\.'\llr.,n,,:,: ,;:,.,tier rwuvidln,t OW iruun.-stull hoc l.'hn,,i:n I')' Gr.aN•w IIUl>t1. .... "'I In Ro. ...... -f-.ury',o; :ippuv·.il which 1-h.all nn1 he unn:r ... vmahh· wi1hhdd. All '""'r .. ncc.-rulic·tr;<1, :and n."ftl.-,al,; .•hall h, .• ac.:cpc-th&c 10 lk·nc-fit:i.,r,,· :and ,i.hall mdudc: .1 siand.;ard monK:IRl.' claul\C. lk-nc:-ftci:uy •li.,11 11 ......... the nJl,hl 1n hold thl.' rnhd<.-.. :uuJ n:11 ... .,,..-:ib.. If 0..."flL"1ciary requuc. GramOf sh.Ill rume llencflcbry :as •ic-payC"C• aincJ .... h:Jll pni,mpth· tcin• 1n lk."IIClk:i:ir)' :,.II ,....,,.-;.,._... ul J"'Kl J)IYIIIIUII\. .. ;u,U renewal nouc:e<. In 1hc -ent nf lo.u. tk.,nmr Uull Kn·c f'O>mpc nt.>1k...,. "' the in,,ur::in,.-..· ,.orricr anJ Ht.-ncf'"Ci.it')· Hcncf..:i;at')· nur na;ake pr<X>I d IO!<.• tf l"IOI 11U.dc: p,romp:ly h)· Gr::1n1nr, I 'nh:,, ... lk-nc-fKl.;al')· and Gr.uil« Ul~'UC" aJ171-....-In u,ntin,r. 1n,.ur.an<"C P">"-'C'l.°UI """II he appl>t.od tu -nratioo err rq'l<,lil ol I.he .,,.,p<.-n~· Wm.oJ1,ctl. 11" 1he re<lOl"2lion ot l"lt'f)llit i, e<;oon,rn1c:dly f,·.1.·•1hl~· and Hc."IICforiary'"' ,...,:unry iii null lcs..'\C'ffed n, i101pa1red If OW' re:<,11)11'".ilion or rer,-.. 1, '" not C!'C'Onomiallly fe:1.•ihlc or 11,c:ndiri:•I')··,. ...... ..._,,my wuukl ht.· 1 ... ~ n.-impain:d. the insurance l"",ce,,ed." -..h.ill he :.tpplio:d 10 Ilk" :&urns 5CCUrcd hy 1hos llc.'o:v ,,t Tno .... who..,hrr ,,.. n<III 1hcn d,-.• • .......i, any c"'ct.'""'"' flllld to Gr .. nmr II Gr.,mOf' ;rrh.1ndtH1."' 11,e P,opcny. ot doc-<, no1 an.-'ff ..,.i,hJn j() d.,,,. :i nolK"C fn>m ~·fki::af')· 1h.a1 1hc irv.ur.inc."C.' airril.!r ha,; offered 10 -.enlc ,1 d,,.im. d>C'n IJ.cncfki:;uy rn.1)· colli:'C"I lhl.' in...ur.1nn.• pnx.~ lk.-n..of,d.;111· m..i,.· ... ...., 1hoc Jlff&:C'rda. 10 1'"Cf"Gir ,w n.":5Cof"~ the Pf'opcn)· ,., u, f" .. Y ~'""" s~ured hy 1his IJ,e,,."d o( Trusr. wh ... .,hcr or 11<111 1hcn due.• The 3(kby po..-ri<a.J will hqpn •·hen the nniic:ec is ,t,Ve-n. 1.'nh• 11c:-ndk1.,ry :uwl 1;r.1n11w n1h1.-no."i-:1.~· in wn11ni,i. .;1.11,· "flphc::mon of proc~ 10 prtncip~ 11nall not cx1l"Od Qf" f".,,..J)i"""M'l'C' 1hc c.Juc Wit' nl 1hr m,.,1hly ru,.,,... ...... , n.-ft."1'11...-d lo in f'anlltr""flh f, Of ,.;h:an~ the ;amount. of iJw payn'>C'fll.l 1r unut'r 1-'ar.,w,,ph 21 th<.· l'f'Of'Cl"'I,-' l• :,cquift'd hy "'"icn..-~·. C-.r-..1111,.,·,. nghl lo any i,-uan•.""C' f'OUde, llnd pnxeeds ~ 1;.;,.,,, damaR"t" 10 the Yrof>cr1)' pnur 1,, lhc aotUisiti<>n •h:oll ,-"' Ho.-n..of1<1:af)· 1,, 1hc Clll.:fU ,ol the.-SUln.'I se:ur,ed hy ~ 0.:cd olTl\dl invncdiaicl)' poor 10 dw KqlJ~- 9 ~. Gnmtot MID.II keep the Propeny in ~ on.k-r and c.·unt.U1K>n ;i,nd m;ikc all n,,:.:eua,y cw appn>pti.u.e repalB. 1L;-,l.ic:cn>CT1<,. arMl re1w,11,;aL,. lhct"coi o,..,..nto, a~/1 no1 ,., pc.-rmil ,,., ;,Un•· any ...,. .. ., of the Pfflf'C1"Y or m..ake oc J'C'f'f"UI 10 be nl.Kk: "'"\" m.ik......,,I .il1e1·,uk>ns or ;add11ion,, to 1hc l'n•!"lC'n)· 1h.i1 ...-oulcJ h;,\·e 1he' dJa, uf dinUnishU'",g lhc \'alue lhen."Of nf lhat ,..,11 in ;,n)' .... ..,, imrc:&.1C' the ri•k n( a.ny fltt' nr Nz:an.1 :on.•ln,t ,.,, ,.,( •hf.• , .. on..<111nlt"'lion,.... ......,.,inn 1hc-n:of Gram,w \IR~ 001 10 ahCT ,rr ,._ ..... ,,., ,my /IUUC"IUn: o, f\Jnu,c m 1hc-Prnpc"ny w11hou1 Ro......d°l':"11111)'"" pnur wnnn, c...-...-nl. Gr.ll'IIOI ..hall Pff"'"C."Ol :any an °' thiOJ,t whk:h m,R,Ju advenel)" effc<:1. or impour the \";aluC' ur u.wfuln•:...,. 1il 1hc l'rOpl.'l't}'. 10 ~ PoUawina U~ c.-arr .. In lhil' ev.ent ol ~ h.apperlinR of any C':1.SU.alcy-. ol any kind •>r na1u1.:. nnii,u.rv o~ ev,.1,>n.Unar.:. fnn.:11a.T1 ,,., lll\l~ not C&l\'O:l'CU ~ :any ln.'Uranc:e p<>IK)', rnullin,11 in damaftc.' 1n Of" cJc.r,11.1:ion al dw l'n>pc'ny. ,;...,nuw .~hall g1\·e OOU,.:c thcff,of tn Hcnef",.,.;lary and Graruot shall P'Ofll!*Y ac Gr.al'llnr'• aolc nm and eap,..-n.w, cornmc.-nc:e an,,I d.ilil(l.-ntly continUL" '° ,c:,111.x-c. l"Cfl'"ir. rcpbc:t". rebuild or a.Iler the damaged Of' desuuycd ~ u nearly ,u f'(""''hl,r 1n w.. ,-.,lur, n:,nc.111.iun and ctur.aaer lmmcdia1ely f)nOf" \Osuch dama~ ~ dnuuctk:Jn. 11. CocDpliaDct Vt&b ~ <.i'"'11M10f -"all pnxnpll)· and f.ilhfully g,rnply wilh. c.x,nlonu to and obc)' Of concem; bv :appropn.al<: p,oc:eedln11.• in wxxl faich all pn:-5C111. :and ,....,. •L• he...,. cff<..t,,. .. 11.1 fucun:. 1a ...... oniinance,, rules. rcculabOI\S .and ff'qUlirarirn&a of ~ . ...,... duly c~ilu1..-d JVWemmcnu,l :iuihooritf "r alJl.""K"Y •nd of every haud ol l'lt"C unclil:·l"wrtu:ra h.aVV111 jurt.'ldicOon. ,,.. similar I .J ... o"4 ~ .,. M ,· = I!-~ ~ ... ~.-! ·~ .. , ~ ~-•l ,:... :.·r' ' ,· :~ :-:: body ~ tu~ -tatch may be app~ 10 II or m lhc Pl'OpcftT or'° the tllol!' and manner of us. oc:cu~nqo, J ton. opendDn, rnatnrim:ance or rrn:inMrucdon ol 0., P,opcfly, whculff o, no1 Mdl iaw, onUia.nce. rule, onkr. n:-pdalkJn °'~·ala.II ~tc arnlCIUrlll chanacs o, ~ or Wfflere wkh die we or~ of lhc Propeny, l:Z.VUO ofOlb=WA(p: Granccw.tiall wlyand puncni:ally perfonn all~ and ~-(wcwd as blnd6na upon II unciln any~ ol any nauure wha~ that lnvolva 1he Pff>peffy, lnciudlns,. wkhout 11m1ca1-,,, aU rule, and ~ of a hoaaco;oHcrs or i:otldominknn ~ II the Proprny ii PII*' of a candomlnlum. coopera1~. phued dvw:loped or other 1-:wow1.us UIIQC'b1ion. ·~ 14. 1IDld Ha:rmlec& GnaNor llhaU, •• GNn&Or'• .oleo ,:oa and ~. saw. lndemnify and hQld thoil!! Trusaee and Bcndldary, aJKI their~ offkcn, dircaots, empk»)CCS and ag,eNS. hamiAna ap'-l and from any blfury, cblm, demand. 9UA, judapnenr. c:.ccudan. U.bUky, dlbf. d:amqe or pm:ahy (~Cl' ~ ~ ID as -cb.trns"') affccdng Vie' Pl'Ope'ny, or the VIIIUC!' ol any ol lhe Securtfy ~ llriodna nu1 of. n:suhlng from. or aliea,ed m !Ube OU1 ol or ._.,. frani. any aakJn or inacdon by Gmmoc, e,rcep1 .. may be-the dil'ea r\SUll ol IJendiriacy·• ~-GnmlDI' shall pay an CllprnRS lncuna:I hy they,,_ and 8rneflcb:,y ln defending lbelf wall R!IPrd 10 any and ;1.II Claims. -n-cspenMS ~U ~ aU out~•podlcl n:pm91CS, such as alltlffle)'S' and esr-u· r-. and .tDU abu include dw ~valued uty servtcn n:ndncd by any em~ ol 9ctlcf'ici::uy. 15. S&J. G.....,.. WU poy or A!'tmbu.-, Trusaec and Ber,ctidacy b all ___ .,. anomcys' fees. ~hie-nws and ttpenaa paid OI' lncuned hf Tn,aec,i:, or Bend1cta,y ln any •aion. ~lns cw dltptHC of •ny klnd ln which Truaec Of Bendkoty is nwde a puty rw appears .. pany pla!nUff M ddendanl. tnvof¥tna any of the Sft:urily Oocumencs, GranlQr, ot lM l"lopl:ffy, indudlfta. ~ IJmiutton. to the fmeclosure or Ollhor enl~ of 1hil Deed of TN..c, an'I,' condeffinallon invotvin9 the Propaly, any lldkJn to p,otect lhe MCUrity hcfto(, or any ~ In ~ w bankruptcy, and any SlK"h ~ paki OI' lnc;unal by Gr.I"'°' 9haD CDIISdrute ~nc.cs In ~ ....W. Pa12ARph 16 11£n!of. 16.Ado ll'l 1he--,,I Granter falls CO perform 2ny Kl requilw ol G-by any r;:lllllt Sccur1ry Doc:urncnts ot 10 ,-y ...tlCn ducanyan-,m ,requaedco he paid by any of1M~y ~ 8eMf1da,y may. bu& shall not be obflpted to. rn;ake Sll('h prtmenr IOI' p!tform such act. &.ach pa,-CM' perfusnw,nce by Dc'1Cf\d;r,,y shall l'IOI ha\"C the effea ol cu11na any Event al 0er111ul1 or of Olcndtrl,r lhe ume b m.\klna M1f plymet"M due hcreul'ldrr or under the Ap:emenl. All amounu-" )»Ml by Dencflcbry. logethff wtdl .U ~ Jncum=d In cann«UOn ~. ,-"wall be deemed adv:ann:s t·AdYancc:s·) unda chia Deed ol Tn.lM .nd lhe ~ shall be lmmedlalely due and payable. and mall ~ added 10 I.he Oi:hl. Adftnces shall be:al' inlere:ss rrom 11M' dale ~ aa 1he r.ne spedA,c,d In the ~ and lhllU be IC'C\&tal by dm ~ of Trusc as lhouat,. oriaiftally a pan n( lhc prtnripal ...-&1\1 cl thc Debi;. 17. UM:~ C~ shall l'IOII iae &he Propeny #W :al&ow-the Sllfflle 10 he u-' ot oa."UJ)kd ror any unla...-ful pnpn11e ot In Ylobllon of any pcmwl <W ~. or any Ill•·. ~. ~ ot fellrklJv,e c:ovenanc. a~ OI' aff'ea&na 1hc ux or ~,-ncy thefeoi, ~ ...,.-a IUIY aa 10 be done or any C'OnlJilJon IO mdsl. on d..: Prope,ty or •ny ;n1.ilcte 10 be brought: 1hereon0 Iha& nay~ cb~ unk:u safeguarded as~ by la.,.. or lhac rn;ay, tn la•. t;:OC\SDNle a nUd:ltKC. pul:Mk or pri-ic. Je. OCba' IJ,t:na. Gnu'IIOI' Ida.II nol, wllhou1 the, prior wrtncn consen1 nl ReneCkiary. Cft'ale or pcnnt110 be n,:a&ed or 10 ~in. any rnortpp. pkdgf:. lien..~ or charg,; nn. secwtry inf~ in. or ,rondttk>ral •le of....-ocher 1tllc retetWion aw-men• on (whethel' prtor or su~e to lhc lien., or tho: Sccurily Doc\.lmenb) I.he Pfope'ffv or in.."otnc. themroffl u1her lhan 1he Stt-urily Onr;umenu (•LJeN•). In Iha C'YC'nl Grantor fall• lo p,nmpdy dlKharge any such ~. &....efk:lary nuoy. hw. ....._II NX he-ohllpt.,..J IQ. do .., and any iunounts paid or incurred hy Benefld:uy Undue.Ima, ---* aR<>mq'0$ fce5 In connec:tion \here111>1lh), ahall be U'ellled d Mmlncnl ln ~ •hh Par.aynph 16 hereof, l9. ~ ollk ~. Gnmrr &hall f'IOII 9dl, ,.:on....,.,, tnnSll!'I' or alNgn the Propeny nr an)' ~I Jt'lillne:Y. ~in or •ny pan ~. whdhel' bf' openidon of law or~. ~1 11,e, prior 'WftQen ~ er Benefk1ary. In the cYCT11 of such • ..tea. can-,,.,-. UfU'ldff or --..vnenr. Benr.fld:ary tnaf. a, Its op11un, «-quk'e l~c p:aymern In (ull er aU wms siKUft'd by thls DeecJ ul TN$&. ~. lhi:a opliOn shall not he cxen:tsc:d hf itrncRcb,tY tf efff'd<IC i:I p,ohiblled br ;applicable L;aw as ol the date ol 1htl Deal al TN911. Ir Rcncfkbry e"J!,l!'l"d.-Baldk:&My'a uplion IO i,:qulft Immediate paym,t"N in hill. Bencflcbr')• •haU slve Gfanlot nc.cke of ~ The notn llt.u p,oYklc a period o( na1 lesa 1han 30 ..la.vs from 1hc dale the noiw:..: L1 delivered or mai6cd within ~ Gtan1or musll pay :di .ufflS secu~ l,y dlls Occd o/ Trusl. U Gi,antor f:atb IU pay d1e,e IIUn'l.'I prioc 10 lhe e-aptnolion n/ this pmrxl. Be-nef'kbry m:i,y in.Yoke any remedies pcmuned by this Deed o( TN.Ill widKIUI furtber NXke ()f' drmand on Or.11U(W'. 20. Bft'mlJ ol De6::ab... 1be 1enn P.-ol Defaull. u used In the Sc,curil~ Ocxumcnu. "'1.all mean die ~ or t.appel'l,nlil,, from lime 10 timr. ol any one or n10fC ol the folk,wing, fa) Gnntor bib 10 l'IYU' an,-,-.ymeni requlr,:d by thu. Deed cl Trust or lhe A,srff'ffieftl when Ir. .,. due, Ch) OnanbX' falls 10 comply wtlh any cl the ~. li::'l'fflli or condllionll cir •his Deed ol TNSt. the ~ or :any ol me-5ec:uril'y Orocumcnu, (d GnanlOI' has cnpl(C'd ln DI' ~ m fr:,,ud or m:.le1'bl mbtl..-preserual.lon. eiiheT' by ao or omiMiun, In conneclk>n with th1I Deed of Tru.« OI' lhc A~ :at any Uffll:! durin8 the apy,llcUk>n proai5$ or durins lhc u,m ol dml Deed of TruA.,.. 1he A~: or (J) Granior IKt.!< ,w rau. IO an in :1 way 1hal ~cnely 11ff~ lhe-."l.lriry "'"c.lrl' thb Deed ofTNM, indudinA, wrl1l•-linutadon, rhe follo.....na, (1) Gr3nl:u, Ullrule,a •• u, Ute Propeny or 9CIIA lhe p~ wtthuw lhc COft$eflll ul Bendkbry: (II) Gr:an10r rans 10 maint.:.iin lhe insuni....:1; req,.iin:d 10 tr ,::.tried b)· Gr.an&nr :te..·1:ordiftA 10 dte tenn,, .. , tiffs ~ n( Tru...i:, CIIO Gr.1n1,w fa,b tu pay .tny ~ts cw, 1hc, f>Topeff)I: (t,,,) Gr.an1Uf' perml15 the fllms of a hen a1Ptn."' 1ho: Prope«)" 11eniol' to th2I held hy Hendk:bry, {v) tho: de:11~1 n( c;r:aru<>I' (In the -nc d ,,......,. than one Cr.anll,N", the death of the la!I.I n!1nllllnin8 Gr:aruOI' ,o,1,o CX0.'l.'1fC'tl lhc ~O: (Yi) the Pf'Of'l(.""Y d laL:en by er.ndefnn&lion or J)U"''fl' o( eininent donuln: or (vii) the holdeT ,..-hcnc!'fk:lary nl any mortplll!" OI' dec-c.l nl UUSI ~rinR t.'lr Propcnv convneno:ca fc-wec"-'re ol .uc.h mon,rpgr or deed d UUM, ll. n t--If .tn P.YCnC ol l>ehull 1"hall cJC ... 'Ur and be c:,-r.uinR. Bendict:>ry may .11 Its or,tJon. aft.&."I' J>10Yk1inA Onintnr IMl:t1 at leMll lhirty (30) day, ~ noua: of and npportuoky 10 cun: lhc F."-ol Def'11ub. e1.erd..w any, sane ,w all of the followtntl ,ern,cdics, (,1,) Meek .Aloa.. uenef'lci,uy mav doedal"I" 11 ... unpaid poniun ul d>e Debi to M' unmo:dlately due and p;apble, w1'houc funho...,. nofice OI' dcrnalnd (e9dl d which hc:ffby i, ~~V wah-oed by Gninc,.1. •~pon the Odx ahalJ t,e,comc imniedialety due .tnd .-,y.ahlc, anythinfl In the A~ OI' In dle' ,'M:l,,.U.:cy Doc:umenu 10 the ,:QIIU'liry ~"' provick:d furthiel' ma1 the unp;ud ponJon al lhe Deh. shall 00 lmrnedlau::ly ,1,nd auwmati,;a.lfy due ;,,nd payable wt1houl adion of an,.· kind on the pan of uenef'lcbry. (b) lbdu -WWWal of Deed. ~TfllCO. Rendk.'bry, wkh or wtr:hnul cnuy, penc,n:,,11,-•• by IIS •~ or aunrneys. lnsotar .... ;tppUc.,.hk:. may: tu requei.1 in wri&ing d\31 Tl'\J3,lrl:' or Tnisteeo·s ,u,dwriJ.ed ageru ldl UlC' Propeny, In :iu;·o-,n.bnce wtm the DN.-d of Tn.151 Act ol th&: Suk al •·a..tunirwn (as a.mendc:h, :.c l""blie auction 10 the hi~ bkkkT, and apply the~ nl .such s;ok a.,, pmvidfod by la .. ·. An)' penan. includ,nti: Rcndld.uy, m:1y hid and i,e,come 11-purcha.xf a1 the 1rusr:cc'a ~ (Ii) ,,pon ~ o( the f>mrertY 111 • lnl9'tt-·,. -~. Tru,aec shall delh•ff w 1he ~ 111 such sale a uusaee·a deed., which •;di c. ... _-ey 10 the pul"l"tuu.tt the Im~ in ffil· Prop,eny whkh c .. nior had ot hac..l 1hc power 10 conYC)' at the lime ul the.-r.xc:cudon ,)( lh~ Deed of TRUI, :anc.J -ct: ~ Gram« n,.a,y h3•·c acquln!d 1hcn::;the1". TIiie tnutn.-'• deed shaU recilc chi: I.cu showinH lh:al 1he s;aic ,.,.-cunducl~ In compl~na: wllh all the requin:menu ol law and ol I.hi& Deed ol Tn.u1, •·tud'I rff'iQI WU be pttma fa~ .,.,·idcno.se ol sue.ta c:ontpli:.onC"C" ..nd conrluah-e evidence thereol ln raYOI' ol bona fklo: purchaaeni 2nJ Cl'l(.-Umbr.uK"enr, rn, \':tlue. (UI) lake •er-IO p,ol«t 3nd enlon:e It.• na:11-11 whether by acuon . .UII ... ~ in equily or Ill law (c;w th,:~ perfo,nunc.Y ol any l"lft-en&nL cond.Won or agr,eancN tn the Asre,emcN « tn lh1-~ of Tn1111 0 o,r In •id d the ex«ullo" ol any pawel' herein gr.am"1. or '°" any fOff'CloM~ ~. QI' ror the enlorcem,er11 of any ()(her apPtOpriate lep..l or in,ukabk R'ffW:dy or OIIICIWI.Soe u ~ dull e~; (iv) ,collect any n::ntS. profu. o, OUICf' amounL" due Gnan&ot fTom ilny leuc, land corC:nlCII. or odll!'f' "'~ by whk'h Gran1or 1$ lcuinR OI' iw:Bing a.ny lnlrft.':M in the Property. and c1uffl:·t,e G112111or'• righ(s and ~lies under such -100r-~-IZ.- .. .. . . ·- .......,, ' f5>,· . '' L· i . . -.,·.·\.... . ··'" :--,I;· .. "··· ..... ' = DEED OJI' TRusr (continued) ~ 10 thcr nieru pemlined by law. llenefida'Y sha1J ha_. no obllg:adon co make" an)· denu,nd or inqu"Y .. 10 the nanu~ or suffldency ol any payment: Hendletary ~ or 10 prr.,ena or Ilk any ctatnt or take :my ntM"l'- 10 coUrct °" enf~ the Pl'Yfflnll ol any allDOWUS ~ b ~ 10 undn thls Deed ol Tnia:. (v> pay ore Gn.mor"• behall 1111 or :any p:an ol 1hr debc and ohliptions lhen s«UA!d t,,-any P'P "'°"IPIP'• "---I nl llWII or other lien, whechff ;:,r nc:x t~ aft' lhcn dull!' and pay.ahlc ;and whedWT or OOI GalllOr l.s then tn dc&,ub: unok-r 1~ ptk:11' monpac, deed of tn.ur ()f' llcn. tlowevtt. Bendktary wtll no1 hi:-~lffd tn do Ml. Any Jlllymrlll Hend"lriuy malcn shall be<conw pan of 1hc-~. :r.nd shall ~ payahle °" Rlmefkbry'a ,lcnand. 1oanha W\lh ln .. :n.,,oc •• 1Jw -r:a1e :u ,iw Debi ~,. from time 10 Ume: (vi) otM:aln or updatt conunlnnrnls for tkw U\Sl:lran(',e,. l;lllf t..cunni nr lkk--,chc:,i conc,emina lho: f"n,pnty. Any :anmunta 1ha1 Dendkbry spends In doina 110 ....tll bcC'UfflC' pu1 ul 1hc Dt-hl; (vtl) CJICft"i.!le' any ol Gr.tntor'lf. rlahf-• and opllions ul'odeT any i-.c.. bnd a>n&nll:I, or odlCT •~• hy which Gr,antor i.s kaRna or ~ any lnlfl'ellll In 1hc! Prnf-"y. inciudina any opdon 10 pun.:hue-the PropeTl:y or,~ renew or ntend dM' lenn ol the lr.l,,oe, land nJn1,ac;1, OIi" ndN:T :agrccmcnf. or 10 prepay in ~ or ln pcll't I.he lcue, bnd tvnlnw.1 or olhn •B'"'fflC"I-Ekn..-.fkbry ..;11 ha_. no nhligation lo cxCKi:lc MIY .MKh rf.alht ot opion, ot lviii)fflura: 1hill ~ of TruM in any ulhcr manner prrmklotd under lhe laws ul lhe S&ace ol Washlnglon. including f~lusurv d thia Dl=ed r,I Tnw: a111 a m,.,rtpl(e. (c) Appo!n al ol~. At any 1lrnc hi!fon: cw aflcr the ~nc~mnn ul an -.,1nn to r01c:-c.1osor 1hb ~ nt Trust, Bcndkia,y shall be cnlldcd 10 and may •PPY 10 ~ coun ror 1he appoinunenc cl a ~,-r ol thr Properey. wtlhou1 nodc't' or 1hc ~ ol bond cony and all such noel«' and hond helna hereby e,i:Pff'UIY waived) and wi1huu1 ,qprd ID d~ MMl-.y « uuolv,ency of Cir.Ll'ltor a1 the ~ ol appUcalion fo." IIUdl ~Yff and -nhout n:prd In d~ dwn valuv ol 1hr Pn,pnty. Suc;h reocrt¥ft' shall ha-powrr IO collect the ~pu. rom••. ~ :.nd prul"IU d lhc Pn,pnty, includfflH durins dtr pcndcnc.-y 1-l .u..-h fotedmul"t' actton and. In n.,,e ol a :,.ale-.2nd :a ddk-k-ncy, during 1he run .. cuicwy prrind nl n.-dcmpian (if any). -hccl1n 1hffe be-l"t'dempclon or n«. as wrU a. dul'Vlg ;my f1,a1I~ tirm.s (ii any) -hen Gnantor, caccp: rm-&he iNetw:nunR al r.u.:h rca:h--.-r, would he ettetdcd U> coltccl sud, n,cetpu.. ~. iMu&. .. and pmifha. und sail Dlhrr poweni whkh may he ncceMal')" or 11r~ u:aual in aKh a..a re. •hi: pn,raiun. ,-.on, o.-unuol • ..,.~ and operation of I.ht Plopc:rty. Such receiver shall have :tU ol 1111;!' righu. and pnwns p:,m,in,cd under the bw,; ol the St.le oC Wa:ahlnglnn. TIie tceelvcr shall be awhori~ m apply the nn •- in its hand, in p;aymcni in -hole rw in part ol, (a) the-Oehl ,,.. any ordei-or Jud8rnefll r~11 lh.: liir:n Qi/ this J>ec,t1 n# Tn.,,.._, ur any ta:11:, ~I -.i f,.. OlhcT lien whkh may be or bcaxne superior 10 the tlcn and .CC.'Ufk)' ln1cn:a hel'a:of or 1hr IOCTi ol 1IUd1 nrdcr ..,. ;uo:Jgrncrn. pnwkled •uch appUcnk»n ls made pdor 10 foredasure sate; and (t,) die dcflcien<:y In auc n# a rclft"Ck.u,ll' -ic, a,tc..l dcfkicncy. Thll' -.nahk!' c,xpciuc:s, lncludln;l rrc:civcr'• f,e,,e. courucl'.-r-. C05KS end a~·· commw.nn in,.-urn.'U pu_n, 10 the powcn herein cunuincd :!hall be xam:d hoi:r'eby. <d• Remedleo Oilm1lllltlTe IIDd Coacuff'Cnt. 'T?IC r1W,ui .and t,ii•nwdt,e,, of lt.imd'ki;iry NI provided In 1hr Sll'curtry DocvnH'nlS shall M cumub~"ll" and concu"""11 and may be puniued :scprar.atefy, suc«'Miveiy ,:,r IIDR",.,her ::a.iplrw OranlOI' OI' lhlll' Propeffy. or any one ol thrtn. a1 the .de di.tnrtion oC Ucncf',c:Ulry. and may hit' lt'lllnc:U<ed :u, oft"' ;la o,,.~saon 1hrTll'for shall .arue. all 10 d'k" mu.unum e:anw: pernuned by appUcabk! laws. rulft and ~latlOfU. II ~ry c'-u 10 ~ undo::r one rt,tn ot -,,, und« 1hb o.i:c-.1 ol Tn&a:1 a, I.he A~n1. ~a,y may at any lime cr'.-e pff1'~lf'lfl undc:'I' 9U<"h riahl ot f'll'fflll'd)" and p~ under any Olhlrr liflhl or renwdy under lhls l>ced ol TNSII or chc AJ1n,emcn1. 'Ole failure 10 e:11~-:my such rtpil c. R'mCdy ah;ill in no -nc be consuucd as a -.h·C'r W' n:lca,ic thcrll'of. Nothing In lhe A~ cw 1hb l'lll'ed ol Tru:al IINlll aff'c,c., Or.anwr'!I' obllptlnns IO pay the-Dem and pn(mm Its obU,tallocu in a«ordanc'e' _.. 1he lrrnw 1hll'fT,of. (ll'• No C Cd = P'n:cltldent 1a ~ al D 11cc Ncitho:r <1r.an1or nor any oihcr penon now o, hcrll':lftcr ohl~1cd rnr tlnrly paymen1 of all nr any ,-n of the Dt:hl shall be relieved of :tuC'h ohllg;ation hy rea.'Mln ol 1he accepunce by Hend'lc:i:.uy ur any p;t)-m<:nt aftrr ib due dale, or the failure <,I lkncfkl.ar,.· tu comply with an)" n:qUC!II. of Cinmtor or an)· Olh<rr pttSdn ""' ohlrpled tu lake actkx, m (~ on thi:a Dll'ed or Trusa OI' ochcrwbe cnfon:ll' an)' provisions of lhls Deed of TR1$1 or 1hr Ag1emicn1. or hy rr.uun ol lbc n=i-, ,cpnilc:$.., nr crxukkm10on. or all o, any pan ol thCI' accuf11y hcLd ror Debi, or by n:uon of any .18fCC'TIC'f11 o, Mtpublion bll'c-.:en any su~urnc owner n# 1he Prop,:ny and lk-ncllci.;uy eriendinA W ume of p;i.ymcnl ,,... mndifyln1t thll' lenn.'l of this Dttd of TNSI o, 1he AAn::'Cfflll'nt Wilh04.II Rr.u h.,vin,:; oht.ilned 1he cr,ru,ent of Gr.amor ot such Olhc:r JlCffO": and In chc laUft' ~"CTII Qnuuo1 and .all !CUCh Qlhll'-t penouns ,hall C<')nllnuc 10 ~ liable ,o nuke p.,ynwnt .according m 1hll' lc-nns nf any $\K'h ~~ or modlf'tndon aJUC'll!'ffllffl, unle# ll'Jlf)f'll'.Uly l"t'leasc:d and dbcha,wed In wnrtng hy Brnll'Ock:ny tf, Olocnnttnu:ance af' ~ In ~ Rencr~iary alwll have pmo.'1:<.'Ul!d 10 cnfon:e any right ...,,der ""Y of lhc Security Don1mcnu :ind such proCl."l."t..lintp ~ ... 11 1 ... v,.. i,...,...,. tlUW.:on1inuc.-d or atr..nJonc:d for .:any re:&M1n. IMl'I in '-""Cl"/ $UCh -.-. (k.&ntor and ll•mt'rldary !lhall he n.-N~ 1n lllf.'lr fnnTlf.-r p•l1ion'i :tnd tlw riKl1"1,, n=ffll..-dic:s ,and f'N'Wl{ll'ft ol Ucnef'k."bl)' ~hai.11 continue .. if no _.h p«>n"C'llinw-h.lJ l,n,,.. 1alu .. -n. 2Z. Succaoor T"9Dlee. In the C''-Tll of the dealh, w.soolu1ion. iJ'M.,ap.acttY, dl.-bility m-rcsl~llun nl Tn.ucce. Ik-ocfkbty •hall appoint m "''riwta a $>.JCC'C.UOr 1ru,i;ec. and upon 1hc recordlf'IR ot svch appolnlfflll'fll In 1he Officll' of the.• Coun1y Auditor In 1M ._,,uni}" in ..,h,ch lhc-Pn.,pcny b koc,ned. lhc sucirCNOr ,ro,.IC'C shall be ""ll'IKN -11h all pDW'll'ff ol rhe ori11\na.l U\Ullll'<', .l.1 R -~ bJ, T~ Tn~ ~I n-nlfW'q' all •• any f1Dft of lhc l'n,pr."fly IU thll' pcr.w1f1 Clllrllcd lhc-n:lo. c,n wriuen ~ n( Hrn<.-rlC'l.,r,.", t.-upon !l:llW".actiun ufthc-l)d,c >1Rll ••.-riu-. .... n-,a-r,.,. n.-corn'-")-C made b)· 8o:ndicbry ,., the-pc:nun ftllllk..'U thcttto ,U Cot 1 ,non. In ~ eo.-.,ru ol the 1.1klnx h)· C1T1inc:ru UOfrulin proceedln,:p. ot lhe' Uke of any PQn o, all of the Propeny by any (IC'l.kT.I.I. foll.It'. n1unklpal °' ot.hn ,tm,·cm.rncnul authrnny ot ap:e'n<io thcn:-of. aU a~,U, o, orhcr t'Of11JX"nsauon f01' MKh 1;iklnA ,.h;,.11 1..,. p,a1'8 m l~l.a"· for :app.11,·,111.Jon nn 1Jw J1,,e,bi. pn,vkled lhat nu $1Kh .applJ,c;;itl"n >hall ,c,wh In addiOonal inleft':al ~ ha\'c lhc dfe,.."t of <.unnM any Event of Dd.&uh ts 11:Xicnd!nR lhc 1imc for m.:r.klnH ;iny p&f"ICIII du., ht'ttundrr cw undtt ttw A,v,eemrnc. ,?", Prior Deed ofTnat. If 1hiil Ot•c-.:1 nf T"""" LS. "ul-,c..,., 111 :l prior IJICK'IJeayc." or dcc.-.:1 uf lrw.l. Ille IK.-n ~ .,.,.hich is "-Upcrior IU 1hc: hen nflhLs. flc.-.:.-.:1 nf Tn,,... (';r.am,or ;a,;,n.-.::io 10, p.:w -.~d, inN.ollmt.-nl ,,t aloe ,k:bc --...-un.'l'l ll)" the.-prior nu.npge or llccfl of'""" when II P due'. u.·h~hrr hy :oc-..~lt'r~uiun ,,.. ,111 .... .....,-....., •. C.r .. ..,,., .olM, "'IP'-'l!lll lu ray :1n1o.l p,..-rfurm .&II other nhlifCa,lic111., nf lhc nKN18l"8"" ,.,. gr.in1nr un<lo-r 11,.,• p,rio, fTil>fl!C:ltc'' or ,lcrd ur nu,il (";,.,.nl<lf' agn....:,,, lu r,nn.id<.• Rt."f'IC!'t<:i.>ry ,o,itl, ,....,..c ,.C payn,,.:nr c. p,rff,.....,.nrc ti~ 1hfo rnor mc•"g:lfCI-' or d1.,:,I nf 1ru~• wl..,.,...._.,,,.., Ro..·m.,f'tc.Uri,· n..-.:1uC'l'I.,. ii. If Gr.inu,r rail, ID p;ay :1ny irvaalbn<."rll nr fl"no.'"ipal nr 1nll""""'' wh1-n 11 i,i dn-.• ,,,. 1r <..::r .. n1ur fail, tu pay ur r<-•rfurm .. ny ,11h1."T uhlitpliun uncJc.T 1h1." priur rn<Jrtg;r.g,: or Jcec.l of'"''"· 0..'l'tt.ikUll· "'h:111 h:tvt' 1he riid11. IM,1 "'" 1Jt<· ,,1,1;~"'""'· 11• pay 1lw 1.,.,.un ....... 1 ,., 10 piy or pt.-rf'<>nn AUC:h ,11hc:r nhllp1ion on Gr .. mnr·~ hit'h:1tf An)· :un11um ... l\o·n.·r.n:.ory,· "r>''l'1Wt, ir. r--rfunninic G.-.1n1n .. · ... ,olWiic;:,tiun, .,..II 1-,,mr. run nf it.... rlot'hl. pay:ahlr hy Gr .. me>f' un lk-no.•rk·a:ir)··_,. <lc,:n;ono.l, :1nd ...,·,11111.-..or into.-n:"' "'' 1h1." 1,:.unc.· n11c _..,. thC' l.>o..-t11 he,1n, fn•m linw lu Ii'"""· Hcnc.-r1e:1:11ry ma:f r,:I}· upnn ,1nr "'"ffllt"f'I nollC'e ol tk-faul1 unck:T !hi." prior namsaJCC .,, Jc.cd u/ 1ru,11 1tu11 lkno--racia!'Y n.....-i.-ivc,i '"""" 1he hnkkr nl lhl: pn<v '"''"IPR<=,., d11'1l'CI nf tnHt ,.,,·t-n 1h,,ugh Gr.1nU>t tJuea.tion!,. o, den~ 1tw ~lliwc:ncc, ~.JLlo.-01. rw nature or the dcfaull. C.ran1or •hall nnr --. ('111""1 ,.,. mnd<f)· 1hlt' f'TW'"' rnolf'ltpF ~ deed of'"""· •nd ,ih:all not I~ UK: dlt'hll llll'l.-,,.f'led hy the prior monpa,r • ., ,ff'II ,-,r 1n1.t, ,vi1huu1 Rcni..fin:.ory,-·,. 1H'Nv wrinrn con.s,ent. l6, ~ olvarrandeo GIid C COW 1l)lt' ~. ~TIUIUOftS. ~ and .2a,eemenlS -Corth In the S...Urtly UoculllC'rllS stull AJrvive lhc making ol thc k,.;:in and 1bc C'llt"<.'UIMN, :.oncJ Ot'liVffY of lhe ~. and shall t-onlN'luc in full r......-e and ~flea unul the l~hit .hall han:· bt'en paid in full. 2"'. Jluftbcr ~-Gnnlor shall. upon the r-,.oruibte ~ ol Aawf'odal), e:Ka.utc. acknowledac aod dc!Mr 9UCh f\inlwt in..,.rumll'nt .. (indudiOR, ..,°il.hOl.ll llm11.:nlon, a d,:dar.atlnn o/ no se1-of0 and do such funha ;aas a,r ma)' be nccesaary. dealr'a>le or pn.....,.. m ....,1'1). nul mir:,r,e efl'ea1,"d)• rhe pu~ ot \he se,cu,iry llocumenu and 10 .ubjen to the lien, ~ alt)," Pl"tJPt'ffY inf-."nl.Je,j by 1he lft'mS UW"tt<,/10 M covff1:d ~-and any renc-al:a. addluons • .sub:,ntudonl,. ~ or bak111K1.Wtheftlo. UI. 1Lft:on1ioa and PllJno. G ... nc,., .,,hall, a,i C".r..,ntuf''" ......tc c,&!111 11nd ca~. cau.:e li1e.c 5c<:uriry Oocumcnu and all suppkmcnU thC'rcto. fn, "''hit+, cnn.Qnot,h'c n<1hn: nno.,. he g>~· ... -n In protect Dcn...,..,ciaty, ,111 all tlmors, 10 be recc:.rded and fll.ed. and re-recordcd and re-fue-d. ,n wch manner and in --·h ~-eo aa Hcnll'ficjary $hall ,__.)ly rcquca. and atwll pay all MKh iecordin& IUlftll. re·tt'<:ordaRJI and ff"Rlina f<:e1< anJ 01t ...... duil'R'=". 29. a-bpca9CD. Gir.mlot sh..11 p:1y all apphnbk c:09b. expclUC'11 and fee-11 /let fonh ln 1ht' AgR."C'TIWIU- J> ' . . -~ ~ •. '·? '. >:,.• :.r .. , •. ;,. ·., ""' ~ I !} s; lO. No Ccpc wloA a,, • 8y ~ 1M' a~ an,mlnll ~ h) he~ p..1Fo.uw.d OI' fuUWed. or tu t,., .._, 1u fterlitfkiaty, pm:uani to this Deed n/ Ttua, lndudln9 (bul noc lbnlrlcd to any officer'• cenifkal~. bllanOe lhNt. ttalcrno:nl ol ~" •nd lou or CldlCt ftnanc:DI IICa&emall. au,-,,« appnmo. 1lenefictary at.I.I ,_ be dcftned 1n Nwe ama.n,acd or ro:JJ",':N:Tllcd the aufflckncy, kflalil)·. elreo~ o, ~ cfka of lM same,. or of any 1enn. pnwb60n DI' a>ndlllon ~. and such .ca:-ptanat o, •Pfl"l"'al ~ -11all rw-. ~ a, conldlulc any -..nanry or .cpccwnt.aticwl wllh rapec1 lhcmo by Bendlda,y. 31. la..oc pocQtloa of AJ. ns. bit'h aftd eYefY 1enn. ~I'll and ~ .. ~In lM ~ la. by 1hb l'd'ietener. ltw:orponnrd ll'Mo 1hb Dried nl Trwa u If fully 1e1 ronh ~b,. )J. Nodoe. P...:rp: for any ~ required under applk:able b.w to be atv,:n ln anothff m:IIUIC't', any ,-Jee p,ovklcd flW ln •his o.e-1 of Tnd shall be in W'ftl1na and shaU be deemed property ~ 1~ 0) d;aya aflcr dl:pol,11 1hereol In any main or branch Uruled ~ Poll Office. certlfled « f1rM eta. United Slain MaU, paaage prepakf. addteu«1 as foUows or a1 aKh other ~ .. maybe ~led by~ aa providnt hcrdn: If 10 lhe Bnlcfkl:a,v: Kina C,oufllY Cn:dil Unkwl JIOI 5-cor,d Aven ..... Suile too Sntdir, Wa.shin_...,. 98104-ljlO 3) ~ Ctonn1nQ Vld:I cbc UM. AU ~ conuiincd In thd Deed ol Tnaa llha1I nm wMh d'w Land. )4. aad Aml;:pl;t. All ol lhc 1c,-m,, nl lhis Deed of Trull slM.ll apply to and he hindil'l9 upon, and Inure 10 lM brndll o/, lhe succcsaon and ustans of Gr.int« and Rend".cia,y, ~y. and :1111 penon.• cbitmlna undeT or throullh, them; ~ that nathina ln lhb hraa,-aph stall he com11rucd 10 pnmll • uand°ft, ~-or ante uncut odM:t' th.an as ~Y Pftffllttcd by 11m Deed ol Tru... 1'. Muhlplm c.r-Grancor'a c;O¥ftlal'IU. a11nd a~ hen:undcr shall be fmnl, ~ and prirn:ary. Any Cranffll' who co- ..... ihb Deed uf T, ... I-docs not .execute the A~: (11) ~ ~AJURA lhb Deed of Trust only lo m<ll'1JP~. grant and C'Of'I~ the Pruperty: (b) is no1 penonalty obliptNI 10 pay the Odx; and Cd a...-due ~ :and :any nlhn' Gramor may :a~ 10 eiiacnd. modtfy, rcwebcar « make any 11~1ionll with ~ ro the 1rnns of th&'f Oeftl uf Trwu, ur the Agrc,emem wtthout du,1 GranltW'a conserw. 36. !lcou lllllly. In ca.-:anyone«~ nfthe ohlip~or tM pn,vulonsnfthUI ()lc<cd olTnast orof !hr~ SNIQ be detffmmed 10 be trivalld. tllqpl ur uncnf~ In ,any rcspecl. the v;alldlry of lhe iemaUW'lg ohUpdons « pnwtsioN ol thb Deed ol TNSl shall hr In no W11Y allfl.°1ed., ptjutliced or dlswrhed lhn"eby. 37. ":fed Tltis Ored of Tn&Sl mDY nrw hr rianFU .... wed, discharr,ed « 1ern1Ana1ed or.ally. but only hy an ;,._m,:nt « tnsln:1nlC"nlA in W1Uin& .ia,lftl by lhe pany aplnsl whk"h enf"nn:-of the c~ • ...-a ... ""ft". d~rge, •• 1cmnina1ion is us.ened. 58, AppUczible I.aw. n... ~ of Tnu1 ah::aU he 8(WCfflftl by and aJl\9UUftl accnn:lina to the la1VS of the S&;u.e o( W»hlnpon. 39. 5tnct Pu Ill a=---Any fall we by Denefkta,y to inJ,ISI uron .arid pedomunce hy Gntnfflr o/ any of 1hc: terms and pn>Vislon.s ol tlu.s [),c,al ol Trual « any of the SK\lrily Documenu. 11haJI .. ,. be d,t,em,ed IO be a t11r.1h--er of :any nf 1he nnM nr provlsion.s ol this [)eeocJ of Truat or any ol the secumy Docvmoent,. and Bcndkiai,y shall have the rl,:h1 1M~f1e.-m in.YSI upon a1rkt r.-rfonruoncc by Grantnr ol any and all of~ 40. Headluo, n,e headings and the~ and paragraph iendllenllCfflS heft'Of' an: in..1Cffa..l '°' convnuencc of refCl"C"nCC' onl)._ and M.IIJI in no way ahtt o, ffKMfify 1hr 1:e-,11 nl n,ch panwaphs. seatons and AUt.uc,j~. 41. tUdcnl. If one 01 ~ tidcls are aaached 10 and made a pan of chill l>l:oed of TI\Ul,. the covenanL• and agn:c,ncnu, ro, each sum rider llhlall be l~ed inlO and •h:all amcmJ :;and a,J'f*fflCfll the ~nu and :1~-..c:nu ol 1hia. l>ced o( TNSt. IN WITNESS WHEREOP. the C.nnuw hu ~..:culed lhil lnAr\lm,rnl the day :and .,.._.. n,. above wrtnen. STATE OP WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KltG DATI1:D. ..... ,rw:i,-,ar,. ll- i,;, ;- ' ! ' LE.GAL DESCJUPJ'ION THE EAST KALP OP THE NORTHWEST QtmJt.TBll OP THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OP' SBCTl:OJI 14,. TOMNSHIP 23 NORTH, JtANQE 5 EAST, wxLLAMBTTS MERIDINI, llf ltlNG COUNTY, WASRXNOTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTXOH' OP SAID BAST HALF OP THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OP THE sovrKEAST QmulTBR OP SAXD S2CTI:ON 14' DESCR.XBBD AS FOLLOWS: BEG'INNINO AT THB SOt.mmAST CORNER OF SAID EAST KJU.P OP THB NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE !lOU'l"HBAST QUARTER AS THB POXNT OP TRUE DEGINNXNG; THENCE NORTH 25•21 • EAST 5.Zl, 99 P'BBT ALONG THE &AST LI.NB OF SAl:D JUST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTF.Jl: THENCE NORTH ae•07' sa• 1f'SST 11553 .ti1 FEET TO THE WEST LDm OF SAID EAST KALP OF TH£ NORTHWEST QUARTER OF "Ml.E SOUTP.s.AST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH o•27" 05" WEST 525. 82 FEET TO THE SOUTH I.IKE OF SAXD BAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOtrrHi:AST QOARTBR; THENCE SOOTH 99•17'35'" EAST 653.80 FE~T ALONG THE SOUTH LXNB OF SAXD BAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE S0tn'HBAST QUARTER TO THB TRUB POXNT OF ae:Cil:NNXNG; AND EXCEPT COUNTY ROADS. j· • f ,. 1 I .., I ., ' I N Q I ff !! - I . Rcauo To: · . · · IMC HOR~ COHPANY OBA COREWEST HORTGAGE.COHPANY 5901 EAST FOWLER AVENUE . . TANPA, FL 33617·2362 Aaessor'I Pmocl or Aa:oum Nwnba: 142305·9022•07 Abbrcvl11od LcpJ Description: . ·. SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST ' Full le1AI deacripUun locatcd on p13c llllluda: lot. blocl 111111 pill or sccdon. lotmsldp ~ ruiicl · · .·· ·.. · · it l,fpxio .t.bn4' fl* Um l'tr RIC#'llla;1 DcwiJ c.w -7"77'?5/:-. ·· .. · ....... _3llA•ll02ll /°I · . · . DEED OF TRUST TIIIS DE6D OP TRU~T ('Sccurlly llu""'-1') Is ....SC on July 18, 1997 RllllIRT A. IIIIR Nill CL YOOIAE !'AIR, tlll!8ANO Nil Wlfl: c·Bomrm-•j, '!be ltwlcc t, FIDEL ID HORTGAGE "TRUSTEE SERVICE, A CALIFORNIA-CORPORATION • Tbegnatar ls ("Ttwtee'). Tbe """'Oeluy Is li'C ttl!TGl6E CIJll'Alff ll8A C(REJEST IOl11l!GE ctff'Nff whleb 1, ormlzod and existing Wider lho lllWI or FLORIDA ... J-1.t'on, CACT-Cl'IJICO IUIC'Wllr __ .. .,. ..... _ -· ·--· ..,, ........ .. . , mdwbosc TAMPA. FL 33617•2362 i'Lendcr"J.Bom,w.rowesl.codertb•prlaclpol ,umof Ont llundred 1\Rlnty·T"° Thousand I 00/100 Dollan (U.S. S 122.000.00 ). WA8HINQTDN-S1ngle Famlly,,fl'CMAR'Ht.MC UNl1)ffM INSfflUIISff · ..... :J04e e,so ~ct m, qj!\ .. HIWA1197011 ·-12/13 C:...'/) M Pta• 1 of a lnltlDII:__ • "' VMP MORTGAGE FORMS· f800ID21•7Z81 111m1wm1 : .. -.. :',::';'.;;.~ ·::.;:;_;. ... -:-·:•:·,·;;~: .·.,;;:x,,,,w"1\l'!'!isi;7i/~~~3-l~~~:ll~lt :.; ' t ~. ; I ·I 1 'I .. ' ' Thu debt ii cvldau:<d by Borrower',· note dmed: lbc umc d.uo ;;, 1h11 ~I)' Imu11111;,111("No1e•), whlcll · provide, for mooihly paymcnll, with Ibo l'ull clcb1, .11 not plld earlier, . due 111d pay,l,le on Auvu,t 01, 2DIZ • 'Thi, Sealril)' luulllllelll .....,.. 10 Lada: (a) Ibo rcpaymeu1 or lbc debt r.vldmml by Jho Nole, wlih llu""t, 111d all RIICWij,, Ol!Cllllom llld modincalOIII or lbc NOie; (b) lbc p,ymau or all other 1wm, wlih lnlm:11, lldvm<ed llllller plUl#ffl)h 7 lO proled the ICCUril)' of Jhl, Seourtiy lnslnlment; 1113d (c) Ill< pert'OC!IWlal •/.Bo:ro_., "'""''"' aod •sn:•mc:rus ·llbder 1h11 S<curiiy Imrrumcnt and ~.Note. For thlJ purpose; Bonower lm:Yoctbly·grmtll md convey, to Tnmcc, in uuu. wbb power of ule; lhcCollowlllg daalbed propeny locau:d In · . . · · · KIIG . · . . · . Couaiy, WuhJnston: T1i[ NORTH IIAIF OF 1llE IO!lH HALF OF 1lE NQ!IIIIESY. 00/llllll OF lllE IIORllGl!ST Q\JAATEll.OF TI£ SOUll!!AST QIJMTElt OF SECTIOH 14. TOl,IISlflP 23 Nalllt,.IWtGE 5 £AST, w.H,, IN KING CO!IIIY, 11'.SHINGTOH: . EXC£PT THE ll!SnO FEET COHYEYED TO KI?ll COtRflY IN DEED ll£CORllEI) I.OC.al Kll¥l COUHTY RfcallJIIIG NO, 1~243. . whlcll ba, Ibo addreu oI 13606 156llt A'l[Mtf; SE, RE111'01t i!"'L Cl~!. Washln11on9SD5! . JZl,Cod•I ('Propcny Addrw'); TOOmll!R Wllll all iho improvemeulJ now or beriaflei Cl1Xled on Ibo PI01l<r!Y, and all ..........,, lpp\llt<II"""', Olld nnurea now or hmal'ler, pan or lbc property. All rcpl=mon~ 1111d lddldons ihall also bo covcnod by tlliSocurily IAstrwne:it. All or Ibo fo,qolns lue(em,I to la Ill!• S<curl1y.wtn1100D1 as lbc "Prop:ny .' . . . . .. . BORROWER COVENANTS 11111 Borrower ii law!lllly selsed or lbc....,. hereby coovq,od and bu die . rilbt to gtallt mad "'""' Ibo PIOperty 111d Iha! Ibo Property· ii unOIICWllbered, except for c:ncumbtuxcs of rocord. Borruwcr WIITl!III nnd will defend geaenlly ihe tltlo lU Ibo Property aplmt all clalma and do much. 111bjcct to aay t11CUmbmic:et or record; . · . 1l11S SECIJIUTY JNfflUMBNT A>Olbblel unlfonn a,mw,t, for nstlocal ""' and noo-uolfonn covenanu wlih llmltcchutlllions by Jurltdle1loo lo cc,IISIIIW, • Wlllomt B<CWII)' inllMnmn ""'erinl rcoJ properly, . . . . UNIFORM COVENA!fl'S. Borrower 1111d Lendor cov:mnt ftlltl -.. roll ow,: I, . Pnym"" or l'Mdpol aad latuert; l'rellaym"" aa4 Lale Charge,. Borrower dull prompdy pay wbe11 dlle Ille prloclpal or aod 1011,..,. oo lllC debt .. ldcatal by ihe Note and my p,ep,ymem and lmc dlrrga due under tho Note. Z, Fwulo for 'l1wl and llmmuu:e. Subject 10 appllcabl, law or 10 a wdllcn wlllvor by Lcr,dor, Borrower alull pay IO l.<adcr oo Ille day mombly pa)'IDCllll IN due Wider ihe Note, Wllll lbc ND111 ii paid la run, a SUlll ('l'uoda') ror. (1) yearly WCI and ............ wllJcb 1111)1 lllaln priority over lbil secaril)' lll!UtllDCII.,, llcll oa lhe Propeny; (b) yarty lcud!old pll)'lllellll ar llOIIJld 11'1111"" tlzo Property, if any; (c) yearly baZllll.or prapeny lmuralloo p:,mltlms: (d) yeuly llood laaurme premiums, If any; (c) yearly IDOff11'3C 1-pn:ll'Jwm, If &ey; and (n 811)' IIIIIU p,yoble by 8otro-lO L,ndcr, la -wllh lh• provWom of pan,gmpb 8, lo lle11 or 111• poymcnt or mona111r ~ ....... pmnluma. 'lbCICI 11cms 11111 t!!!~ ·~~ !!~. • !.~ m•y • ., P!'Y !lmP., CINI.er a.Id Mid Putlda In aft amount naa to ex&m the maximum IIIIOIU\l 1 (ender Cor I Cedcrllly rclllcd monaaao lom may rcqulre for Bonowcr", escrow ICCO'.WI under tho (odcnl Real lla111c Sctdcmct11 l'mceduna Acl or 1974 es llll<lld.ed Imm tlmo to rime, IZ u.s.c. Scclioo 2601 111,q. ("RESPA"), uclOll annlhcr law dlll iappllel lo tbc' Fund.I Id• a Jeucr llfflOUIII. IC ao, Lender may, at any 1lme. collect i:nd bold Pundl ln ua amouu1 ooc to nc:eed tbc I mer IIIZIOUlll. Leader may estlmarc the amotmt of Pwtdl due on lhc bub of cwmu d1111Nl r=uoaablci c:c.Jawca of e,i:pendltura or ruiun: &crow 11am or othcrwiac in .cccordancc with ippllcabfc faw. The Funds ,ban be held. In an lmdNtlon whose dcposlt1 an: lmured by a roc1era1 tgency. lnstru.,.,ualliy, or cnu1r (ioducllaJ l..clldor, If Lcntlcr ii ,ucb III lmtlhltloa) or In my Federal Heme l.om "'""" ,.. ,,,,. . ~.Glt!WAl1170tl P1002ol0 (!.-,0 ./Ill. . -;;;;;;;;,0489190 :riil . ;• ·'· ,.,·: .. ~.:_. .. ;. ·v· r·t-tr:.-.. .. ;;;,•;;ji\;;tC<citi1i'lil\11.~--J?/J//!K!ii,;1i~ji "i. •.· ·., ' ' Bank. lender alwJ apply lhc FuDdl lo J)l7 the E,crow I1cms. ~ may Dot cb,:ge Bormwc:r (OT boJdlng and applyln& lite Plllld,, llllllllllly wlytlng the esm,w """"''• or vcrifylll1 tho Esaow ltcmJ, ualcu Lender pll)'I Bonower lnlcrcot oa Ille fund, and appllcablo law pcnnua Leader to mw, aucb a charge. However, L<nd<r may -"" Borrower to pay a oac-tilM cbmge for an ladcpendall ic,J """° w r,poniDg acrvlco used by Leader ID co1U10C1lon with lhb loan, ualcu applicable law provltlco olhcrwlla. Unlw ao ._, II Ill.Ide or_appllcahle law n,qul1':1 !JI....., to be paid, L<ndcubaJI oo< be requited to pay Borrow.r my Im.,.,. or camlnp oa Ibo -. Jlomr,,er 1111d Lender may qrco la wrftlog, however, that in,...,. ahall be paid on Ibo Fuoda •. Lel>der lhall alve to Bomiwer, wllhOUI clw!!•, m mnual ""®llllna or the Fwub, lllowln& aedli, llld dcblts to the Punds md Ibo purpose for which each debit to lhc Fundl was made. The Puods ore pledged u llddltlOllll 1ocurity for all llllllS -=I by this Security 1Jutrumen1. If lhc fw,d, beld by. i..oder excood lhc IUDOIIIIIS permllted to be bold by appllcablo law, Lemlor lhall aa:.oun1 10 Borrower ror tlla cu.css Ftmdl ln accardmc:e whb tbe requlrcmcot1 of appllcab!e Jaw. Jr the IIIIIOWll of the FuadA held by l.auler ll &II)' tlmo lo not aufO<lent ID poy the E,cmw l~ma wbeo due, Leodcr may ao oolJfy Bonowu lo writma. and. h1 mcb cua Bornrwtr •ball pay to Lcodcr the amount bCCellllY to make up the defkleucy. Borrowrr a!ui.11 ,nab up tbo dcf1dcncy ln nO more chm twdvo moruhly paymmu, 11 Lender's sole dl;crct.1012. ·. · . . Upon paymmt la IWI of all 111au ,_ell by Ibis s«urt1y lnltn1me111, Lender sblll p?Ompdy Rfund to Bom,wer &II)' P«nds held by Lcudcr. If,. under. p1t1!8f1Pb 21, Lender' dw! ~" or ,ell the l'ropeny, Lender, prior to Ibo ,cqubltloa or Ille or IIIO Prupeny, · lhall apply &II)' PumlJ held b)' Lender" tl10 tlmc or acqul1i1lon or sale.a a en:dU qalm.t tba awns~ by 1h11 Securil)' lmtrwncnr. · 3. AppUcadoo or Payments, Unless epplicable law pnnidcs · alherv,lsc, all paymalll recdvcd by Lendor nndcr pangnrpha I IICd 2 &hall be applied: fill!, 10 1111)' P'"l'•YIOCO• dwaco duo undo, Ibo No1e: ""'1nd, IO aax>ual1 payable under -b 2: lhlcd, to lnlerat due: fourth, io principal due: ond l.ul, to any Ille clwJCI due under Ille Note. . . 4, Chal'ges; Ll,m, Bof!Ower aball pay oil wes, weumen11, c1wg.,, fines aod lfflFo,ldona auriltullblo to the Propeny wblcb may IIIUID priority over lhb Security Imuumeo~ IOd lmcbold p.,ymen:a or ground'n:1111: 11..,.. 8"crower Illa!! poy lbcse obllg11lona In the =er pn,vldcd ID -raph 2, or Ir not p~ In lbal ma.rum, Bono\l'CI" wll pl)' .them on dma dlro:t.ly to lhe permn owed payment. Borrower dial! pcomptly ftinwlt to L<llder all l!Oflca or -10 be paid uadcr 1h11 pl1'grapb. rr llomlw<t 1DW1 these paymcnts dlffl:dy, Borrower Illa!! pn,mptly l\trnlsh 10 Lcadcr-lpll CYidcncln& che poym<nll, Bonower lllall promptly dbclwgo IIIIY llcn wblcb bu priority over lhls Security l11>UU100DI unless Jlom,wcr: (•> ._ ID writing to lhc p:iymcm or Ibo obllptlon .......i by the lien In a llWUICr ,mp!Ablc 10 Lemler; (b) CIJ!IICIII In good lallh Ibo lien by, or dcfeodo lgll!ml onfo"""""" ol lho lleo la, legal p,ocoodlnp wbkb ID Ille Leader', O(linlDD operotc to pteva11 Ibo c:ofolmllCtll ol Ibo lion: or (c) ""1ll<S from Ibo bolder of the llen · on ,arcetUeDI lltlsf!Clol)' 10 L<llder subordinating Ibo lleo 10 !Ills Security lm11Umc111. Ir Leodcr delmlllnc, tlw ony pan ol lhc Property l111UbJcc1 to a lien which 1111)' ll!>ln priorily over tbl• Security lmUumem, Lender may gi,e Botrower a notice ldc1111£ying tho Hen. Borrcwer du.II aali1fy 1ho lien or uko·aao or mo10 or Ibo ecllom ICI ronh obovo within IO day a or Ibo Jlvlai or nolloe. J. 11azan1 or Propa;y .__.._ BofflJWff sbllll lcecp Iha ln,proi<:mcrua now cxls1tng or bcrcsllo, C1'C'ded DA lhe Pcvpcnr losvmd tplml laa by a,,,, _, ID<ludod wllhla die cenn "CJ1!<ndcd cu,mgo• and any •!lier b.wlrdJ. lndudlns Rood> or ftoodlns, for which L<nder e<qulrts lmllrml<o. lbl1 taaurmoo aball be malntnlncd la du: llllDlllUS and for Ibo pcrlocls lhar Lcatlcr n:qulra. Tho lnsunnce Clltrier p?Ovldhtg Ille lmunace ,lull be -bf Bomnvcr aubjcct IO Lcodor'1 approval wblcb lllall DOI be UIUQI01llbly wllhbeld. tr Bom,wcr ran, 10 lllllnUID coverage daatbcd obovo, Lender may, 11 Leoder', optloa. oblnln COVffllgll lo pcolecl Lcnd<r'1 rigbls ID Ille Prupor1y ID-with parqnpb 7. All lasurance poUcies and renewal• mall be u:ceptable lO Lender Gild aha.11 lnddc a atlDdud mortgage olawc. Lcndu alutll bnvc Ille rip! to bold the pollcles 1111d muiwab. tr Lerulcr requlru. uom,wer lh:tU P?OfflPlly give to Lender Ill tt<cl{,11 or paid premiums and mcwal notices. In Ibo Cl'CDI or !os,, Borrower shall give pmrnp1 notice to die lnmnDc:a canter and l.ctldcr. Lemler 1111)' make proof of Joa ir not made promptly by llomJwor. Unlcu Lender mid 1lonowor otltcawl,c og?OO la writing, lmurlllOO pn,c:oodl sball be applied to taiorlllcn or repair of the Property damaged. If Ibo ratoralion or rq,alr ls camomlc&ll)' feasible And e...O. m . ,9 ?.'. @.-WAI I07011 P11• :s or a IMl•I•=--;:;;;; 3048 1/90 f: ·,,;·: . : ~ .. ~ .. :" . ' . ... . •,,::i :,; .. (,;: . . J'.:t:r .• ----.. ·-· :::-:::-. '."'7::::;, :-;:-, :'.'· o;:::'.'.".".'.~'.""."~~:,.~.~~.~.::-:,1;:"".-~~, ~~;-;'!':=.':~!lliill!. ..... ·.~.· .•. i.,1;1,·.··.· .•. · .. ·.·.·.·.·._'.·.·.·.· •. ,.· •. ',·.·.· .• ·.' .. •.:,· .••. ·.··.·.••·. -,·.·, .• ·.,·.·.· .• -.·.,_'·'.,:-,..·_,,'.'1','." .. · .. · .• ·':'.·~ .••. ;:;.·;·_','.·,:·.~ ••. · .. ·:·,.:,'.,~'·'~1·,,.·.,'_.r .. ·.,.·.:.r,:~.:r.· .. 1.·.·l::._t.·,·.· • . :~_.;.; .... ;, :/_.,. -~:/./;:~3-/\t:)·~.-.:. ... .":..:·.:,'.:J(~.7};H.f~.~~<~\}j~}~if?r~~rbt#~~~iJ.~w~ .{ .. . . · .; .. ·~~ "-.... w ~-,, ll Ill Cll :'! CD ... !!! .., ~ c:, (" a, . I ' Lender'• security ll 001 lmcncd. It lha ratoradoa or rq,air ii not ecooomtc.ally feaalble or Laldet'• u.cmil)' W<lllld be lcuaicd, !ht lnsurmcc pn,c,eds lhnll be appllo! to the """' NCUm! by thlJ Sc<urlty lnsllllmCIII. wbdbcror not 1bcn due. with any C1CCS1 paid 10 Barmwu. If Bonower Abandons lbC Property, or duel DOI 1111SWer wl!hlD 30 day1 a 110dca from Lcslda' thas !he 1-. curler bu olfcral to setlle o d1lm. than Lc:ndcr may collect tllc:.lnsurmcc procccdl. Lender may U10 the pn,cccda to rrpalr or raton, ~ Property or 10 pay IIWIII ,a:,uod by this Sccllriiy lnsuumcnt, whdilcr or n<K Ihm due. Tbe 30-<lay period wltl beg!A when Iha m>tli;c 11 glven. Ulllm l.<sldtr md Borrower olbcrwe 118"" In writlos, my appllwlon or proc:crdl 10 prindpal lbal1 not uu:od or postpone the due dace of the monthly payaicu11 referred to ID parqnapb.11 and 2 or ch.mp the amount of the payments. If under pansnph 21 the Propcny b Eqlliml by Lmder, llomJwcr'1 right to any lnsurollce policlcs IN! proceeds lmllllllS fn,m d>mqe <o lhe Propel!)' prior 10 the ecquhldon wJl pus to Lcm!a io lbc ,.,.,. or die l1lfflS l<CURd by 1h11 Sec:uitry Jmuumcnt lmmedl11dy pdor to tbe acqubltloa. 6. Oc<tspan<)', PrattntUoo, Malm......,. and Pn>tectloo of. Ille Prope,ty; Borro""'o Lou Appllcatloar Leo.,t,olds. Borrower 1111111' occupy, eil.lblbh, and we 1h11 Plopesty u Bonuwer'I principal rc:11dence wlthla dxry daya after the ac:eutJon or lbl1 Stturlty· fiwrumm:c and tbll.'co.mlnuc to occupy the Propcny u eonower•a principal residence (or 11 ICNt one year alter the dma of occupaiicy. unlcu Lader otherwise apcca. la wrltlDg 1 whlch-CGJUCIU shall DOC br unreasonably· "'°ilhbcJd, or wileso c,.1cnual1Dg dn:tlfflltlDCa ealst wbJc:h me beyond Borrower"• CGntrol. Bormwcr aball not destrvy, damage or lmpa1r die Property. allow tbc Property to ddcriande, or comm.It wulC on the Plvperty. Borrower. alwl be In dcfaull Ir tt0y forfelrur, IICdon or po,coidlns, whe!lter civil or crlmlsw, 11 beJU11 <bttl Jo l..cmter'1 good falt!s Judgmeat could rcsui1 ID fotfdrur,,. or the Propeny or olhcrNila marm111y ltnpllr Ilse llcn awed by 1hb Sccudty ID.strunx:nl or Lmiar'a st.CW'lry lnlcrat. Borrower may cm aucb I de(ault and n:imtalc, u pmldcd ln parqn,ph 18, by aualng the u:tlon or psoccedhlg to be dbrlll,...t with II nsllns thas, la Lender'• good faith itetcnslhwlo11, p,ccludea forfeiwn, of t!so Bom,wer'1 l111C11:1t In thc l'n>pctty « other mmrial llllplltm01t of the IICSI cswo! by thh Security lonrumco1 ttr l,:ndcr's 1«11ri1y lntct<ll. Qom,wcr lball ,110 bo In default If Bonowcr, durlnJ tbe loan appll.catloa proceu. gave mlllCrtally (alao or lnaccura1G lnfomwJoa or awemcnu to Lender (or failed 10 provide Lender with any mm mill Wormadon) ID comC11:doa whb the loan cvid:nced by tbc Note. lodudlng, but not llmlled to, r;pracntat\om conccmloa Bc,m,wcr'; ci=,pancy of &1111 Pn,p:rry u II prln;lpll iaidc11CC1, If thlJ Security lnstnsme111 11 oo a leuchold, ea......, shall c:amply wllh ail lbe psovbionsoflho ltas<. lfBom>wer-1:o, fce 1ltl, 1othel'roperly, t!se lwdlold IIJ<1 tbefco1ltlc,111J oot merge uolas I.coder 1gncs to the merger In wdtlns, 7. Proteclloe of Lmdtr'o lllghta ID~ Propersy. If Borrower falb to re,fonn tho caYCIIIIJ.U end ._u conlllno! ID tbla Sccurll)' Isuuumatt, or ilte10 ii a lcgd pm<Udlstg thas m,y 1lgnlfloantly ur,,:1 L<ndcr'1r1iJtt11st tbo Pn,pony (aucb u • psoc:ecdlDg ID blllknsptoy, ptabot<,, ror condcmnlllon or forfclrurv or to cnforca llWI or n:platlom). then Lender may do amt pay for wbllevcr 11 na:cuary lO protect \be value or rho Propeny aod Lender's dsJ>11 In lhe Propcny. l.atdcr'1 octlon1 may loclud11 payJns .iry 1U1111 accum1 by I lien whkb bu priority Q';er tbb Sccwlty lllltntmcnL appwtns ID coun, paying rwoaablc 111on:oy1' Coa and eo1crlo1 on rho Properiy 10 make repaln. Althoup1 Lender may Utkc 8'tlon under thh pmgr>ph 7, Lender doai l!Dt have 10 do ao. Any 1111111111J dl&borscd by Lender under lhi• pa,qnj>b 7 altall becomo lddlUonal dei>t or Bom,wcr 1CCUred by ~ Security lmtnunc:i:u. Unles1 Borrower &ad Lc:ndcr agree 10 other tcnns o( payment, these llfflOUDU &hall belt lnleretl from the (b!e of dlJbune:ment at the No1e rate md lhl1I be payable,. with ln1crcst, upon notice Crum. Lender 10 Bonowcr requesdn1 payment. :. :".!=i=e"";. ::..:;:.=. :: t.=.=: :::;=:= ..-.::-.;:;: !='.:: = : =-... = :! ::=:!:; :?:: tc::: sccu...i by lhh Secudl)I lswnsmau, Bonvwcr llull p1y Ille premiums requhm to mainuln tlltt monpgc l111urm<e ID cfrcct. If, for 1111)' rcmon, 1h11 mon1ago huunncc caverogo requhed by Lender IIP"' or c:cuc> to ba In effect, Barrower shall pay the prcmiwm required to obi.Ii.ID coverage IW)S11ntblly cqulvllcnt 10 the manpgo IDJW'lUlCI: prcvloualy ln cffm. al a con IUbstml.UIUy eqalvalcnt to the r:ou to Borrower o( the mongage lluurt111CC previously In elf,.., from on ~lenwc mongage 1s,..., 'l>JlfllVed by Lender. If aub1imulally equlvalcrn mongagc lmurancc coverage: 11 001 ovai11ble, Barrow:r shall pay to Lender CDCb t!.,.A) ,n,. ,.,.1'1, (@t~AI 117011 Paoeo&oll lnlttall:~ 3048 1111G COC.-WAI ., V .. I I . , I ' I molllh • ,11111 "!Ull 10 one-lWdftll of Ille yearly mong,ge Inn= premium bctng paid by Bonowcr whtn Ille insurloeo coveragc laps<d or ctaled 10 be In df=. Lender wlll aa,epl, uaa 111d mJln lllcsc pl)'IIICDU a, o losa ....,., la lieu of monwo lmu"""". Lou n:sme pl)'""1111 may no locgcr be r,quln>I, 11 tho opt loo of Lender, If mongap Iman= ""'""'' (la Ille amcwu llld for Ibo period lhal Lender requlra) pn,vldod by 111 lasuJ<r appn,val by !.aJdcr agl!n becomes available 111d II oblAlaed. Bom,wer ""'11 pay tho prmlums requln:d 10 malat.aln mon111e lnsurmce la' c(f'c:ct. or 10 pmvlde a loll reserve, uni.ii the rcqulrcmma for mongage ioaunnce end.a la ICCXll'dan;ce: with atff wrtum · 'a;,mncm bawt'ffl Borrower and Lender or appllcablo law. ,. lmpccdoa. Lender or ILi agml may make n:uombla emrica upon and impecdons or I.he Pn,peny, LClldor ahall alvo Borrower IIClloo II the time of or prlor lo aa lmpcctlon ,pcclfyla1 iwonlble <CUC for Ille lrupcc1foo • 10. Cond01111111loD. Tbe p,oca,ds cf ,ay 1111111 or dalm for damages, dlr<C! or corucqucatlal, Ill connccalon with any ccat.lmawton or other ukiilg of Ul'J put of the Property. or for con,cyance In lieu of condcmna1loo, ""hereby "''BDed nnd lball be paid 101.ctder; In lbe event of a tll!al i.t1a1 of the Propcny, Ille pltUall lhall be ,q,pllcd 10 lhe...,, aocurod by this Securhy lruaumau, whether or 001 lhea due. whh aoy cxceiJ'paid 10 Harrower. Jo I.be. even& of I pnnlal lllklll1 of tho Pn,peny la whlcll the fair ""'"' valu. of tbo Plvpcny lmmedlaldy boforo the lllkllla Is "!ual to or gr=tcr dwl tbe an.au.at or the ,ums secured by tbb Securlry Instrument immcdlacely before lhe Lilt.log, unlCIS Bonower md LClldor otherwise ._ la wrill11,1, Ibo "''"' ICCl1l1>d by this Security lns1rumcn1 llwl be rcdue<d by tltc omot111t of tho procc<ds mulllpllcd by tho lollowlllg lmtloo: (s) the total unount of Ille sums l<Cllted lmmcdlJldy before Ibo lll:iJlg, d!Yi4'.'1 by tl>) the fair u,aritct vslue of the P!oJ,trty lmmmlllldy 11er,,. ,be taklo1. Acy balDDCO lllall be paid 10 Bom,wer. In the event of• ponlal laldn1 oflbe Propeny la which the fair awltot Y:llue aftho Propeny lmmcdl11cly bcfato lhe taklag II leas Ihm the aDIO"JOI of the sums ICC'URd lmmdlately be~nr: rbc uklng, Wllcu Borrower and Leader othc:rwba •SRG la wrt1tn1 or uolcu appllc:ablo law olhcrwl,e provides. tho proooedl 1ball be applied ta the 111ms IOCUrcd by Ibis Security em,nirmm whether or not lbe awns ans rhcu due. rr Iha Propony is lb-by ilon'ow1:r, or ff, Illa 001100 by Lemler co Bom>wu lhll lhe colldcnmor offm 10 mabo u """11 or souls o dalm for damages, Bom,wcr !llils 10 ro,pond 10 Lendor wilhlll 30 day> anor the cw, lho noclce la given, Lender II oulhorlzed 10 collo:1 ud apply lhe proceeds, ai 115 op1loa. ollhcr 10 rcstonlloa or repair or the l'lq,eny or 10 the 1U1D1 IOCllled by lbb Secutity !Jtsttuateal, whclhcr er not lbcn due. • Ualoss Lmlcr cod Dom,wcr olhC1Whe agmo la wrtlll!g, any ,pplkalloa or rroca:dJ la principal 1ball not c.ucnd or posrpoac the due date of the mootbty payments n:fcrrcd 10 In pangraplu I amf 2 or change die mnount or aucb paymerua. U. Bommer Not Reltued; Fol'IH:arslnu By Lmder Not a Walftl'. Ellcnslon or Uac time for paymen1 or modlOca.tlcna of amonlzaslon of llHI sum, s:cuml by 1bl1 Securiry ln!lrumcnt gmmed by Lm:ler to any wccc:uor In lDlcn:st of Bonuwer &ball noa opcnle to rdmc the llabtllly of lhc orfglnaJ Dom,wcr or Borrower's 111ca11on In latcrac. Leader ahall not bo .~Ired 10 conuneaca prom:dlnp qfWW any su=essor ln mtcn:st or relu= to cll'lald dme for p1ymmr or odzmrisc modify amonlzatlou of tM mms secured by this So<urity laslrumont by ...,.. of any dcllllDd moo!, by Iha origlaal Bonowcr or Bonowu's IUCCCUOB In ln1cte1. Atry forbcarlncc by Lender la cxcrcislng any right or remedy ahall 001 be I wAivcr of or prt:e!uda lbc curcise of any rigbt. or remedy. ;:. ~--: ,-...:.:-:;;..~; .!u!..: ::.: ::r=-.: ~";; C::.:!;:=:. != ;::-.::::: :=, ogreemcn11 of 1h1J s«tarity lmttument aball bind ud btncfil the 1NCCCUOra and wlgns or Leader mJ Bon'DWU, subJtU ro du provbJmu of pmpaph 17, Botr0Wcr'.1 covcaanll and 1gm:mcnLt .:baJJ be jailJI and sevcl"DJ. Any Borrower who a,.slgm this Security lmuumen1: but docs DOI execute the Note: (A) ls co,signiog this Sccurhy lnsuumau only 10 mortgage, grant and COD\IC)' that .Bomnvcr't lnreresc la tbe Property Wider tho 1cnns or thll Security Instrumen,: tl>) Is nol pcnooally obllg11od 10 pay the aums l<CUrcd by lhlJ Security huirumcnl: and (c) apoea 1h11 Lender 40d "'Y other Bom,wor may agmo 10 cmml, modify. fotbcar or ~. ,0.P?. i"-""· lnhlala: @.<tHIWAI (9701> Poao I of 8 --,;.; JCl.48 U/00 ··,,.!'.:-·.'.I ' .. l .. • ' ( '" make any cccommod&llom wtlh rqW 10 lhc 1mm of lbl1 Sccw1ty lrull1mleSU or the Nale wllbaut that Borrower'• consem. 13. tan Clllf1"· II tile loan .......i by thb Security Instnllll<!Di IJ subjo:t to a law whldi ,.i, muJmum loan cJwies, Rl!d !hat law II flmlly latcrpn:ted ID lhlll the lmcmt or other lom dwge, c:ollccted or to be collacu:d m CODIIO<lloo wllh U10 loaa . .....,.,l tha permitted llmh,, lhen:.(a) l1IY auch tom charge lhl.ll be reduc:d by the amawu CCO'!lllry 10 reduce tbe · cbargc 10 the pcnrdnrd llm.i1; mid (b) my nuru llrcm, collcaed rrnm Bommr wblcl! ""'°"'ed pcrmlued llmU, will ba rclbm!ed to Bomiwer. Leodcr m.,y dlooae 10 mllb lhh ri:fUl'ld by ralucioa lhc prlDciplU awed under tho Note orby maii.ng II dln:ct paymcn1 to Bom,wer. If a refULl rcdua:a principal, the reduction will be uwed u a panJ1l prepayment wilhou1 any prep,ymm charge Wld<r the Nott. · · . · . . . 14. ~-. Any ootlco <o llomlwet pmvlded (or la thb Security lJ!slnulu:nl wll ba given by deliverlaa lt or by malllna It by !!!II dw mail unleu appllcable law -1"' use of another 111Cthod. The collce &ball bD dln::ded to the Properly Addrcu or any other address Bomnver dcaign!lts by DOticc to Lender. Ju:y D01ia: io J..cadcr a!wl be Cll't:n by dnt dw DWJ 10 Lendt:r'1 oddlftl l11Ud hcrefll or llll'f odJer ldd,... L<:nda de,l&1W03 by l!Otke to llom>Wer, ll1rf ao1loo.pnwldod (or io 1hb Security lnsuument lha!l be dcomr<I to lave beet al= to eo,,,.. .. or Lcude< wben ;Ivon u pnwldal lo tbla pungnpb. 15. Gonn:Jo1 Law: S..enblllty. Thb S<curlty ln.ltnuD,ni lhall be aovemed by federal law :md Iba law of Ille Jari&dlctlon In wblcl! <Ila Pn,paty II loceu:d. In tho ......, <lull my pn,vlsloo or cl awe of this Security lnltrumcn1 or the Nore ocmmc:1, with appllcablc law. aucb coarllca &hnll not affect athcr pnmalcm·of'·lhb Socuriry lmUUIDCIU or. I.be No10 wh!cb an be g.iven cfl'cet v.rithow the connlctiag pruvisioo. To flus end Lbc provilioa1 at thil Security lmttumcat mi the Noto are declared. lo be acvmblc. 16. Bommer', Copy. Borrower llha!l be given one conformed ca;ry ufthe Note and of 1h11 Sccur11y rnr,mnem:. 17, Tnmrer ollht Propmy ora llmdldal tn1cm11 m Dom1 ...... 11111 or lllll' pan of tho PIOJ)m)' or any lotcn:st In ll il acid or uu.1ferrcd (ot If a beneficial u11·erc&t ln Borrower ls sctd or trmsfem:d and Bomnver is aot Ii nanua! pcrr.oo) without t..cnder'a prior written cement, Laidcr may. Al ill np1loo. requjre lmm:dl111: pa]'lllml 111 Ml of all awm ICCW'Cd by dda Sci:urity tnsuumcnl. H~. l.hb option aha.II aoc be acn:lacd by Lender If eun:iso I.a pmhtbhed by Cedcral law u of lhc date ·orllla Sccwtty lm1rument. tr Lender acn:ilcl thll apttoa.. Lcndc:r mall give Donowcr nolice or accelcmlon. Tbo oodcc llwl pn,vldc a period or not leu-than 30 dly1 from the dllc the notice L, dcJlmtd or mall:d within which Bom,wer ID1ISI pay oll .rums """'1:d by this S<curi1y lmuwnctt. It Bom,..., /~11 IO pay rltesc: IUJIIS prior 10 Iba explntlon ot this period, Lccdcr may Invoke auy mJ>:dles pennlnod by llil1 Security Jmuument without ronhcr notice or demand on Borrower. 18. Bornwcr11 Right lo Rdcsbltt. 1r Borrower mecu c:cnaln condltlaDJ, Borrower ahall have the right to have caforccmcnt of tbll Sealr:i:y lnarumtat dlscomluued u any tin prtar to the c:artler of: (1) 5 days (or sucl! olher period " '!'Pllcablc law may ,pedly ror Rlcaw=1) bcrorc aale of tho Plopeny -to ony power or aalc cootwled In lh1a Security Jm1n1111e11t: or (h) awy of a Judgment eororclng lhls Smuity lnsuumcm. ~ comlltlom 1111 ihll Borrower. (o) ll•Y• Lender all wms whlda tbm would be due under lhls Security lllJl.....,,t Olld the No" as If no a=Jeratlon hod oa:urrol: Ch) cum any r1erau1t of ony o111<r covaw,11 "' ,g,..mcma: (cJ pay, all cxpema loainm In cnromna this Security Jmuumau. lndadlng, hut not llmllcd 10, ......,.blo ,,,.,mey,• recs: ui.i (dJ 1111a such "1lon u Lender 1111)' n:,oombly nqulrc lO BIW"e tlW the lien or Udl Security lnsUument, Lender's r11bts la l!-.c Prupcny and Borrower'• obllptlou to p,y tlle 1wu, ;a:uml by this Security lmuummtt 11tall oootlnuo wx:hanged. llpoa reimlllemcnt by Bonuwcr. lhia Security lnsuumeot and 1hc obllptlom ICCUled hereby dull RU1&U1 fully eITcctlvc as If no accclcnsion hll1 oa:umd, However. this rigbl 10 refmtate WU ao11pply in the guc. of accelcntlon under parqnipia ii. . 19. Sale of Nole; Cluurac of Loon Scnka-. Tho Nola or a pmbl lntmst In Ibo Noto (log<1ber wllh Ibis Sccuril)' lnamunent) msy be aotd one or more 1tmes wl1bou1 prior nodc::e IO Borrower. A 141c may ~uJt la I chan1c In Iha cmlty (kDawa u tbo ·t.oan Scrvicer 0 ) dlu collu:ia moatbly paymau, due under the Note and tblt Security lnam.iment.. Then: a1lo may be oac or more ch:lngcs of Iha Loan Servicer unrelated to a ule ol I.be Note. it lhetc is a change of the Loan Sc:rvi=r, Bom,we,-·NIU be gil'cn wriucn notice of \he cbange in aa:o"""1cc with P""IJ11ph 14 llbovo 11111 uppllcabla 1:,w. The no1I"' will ""'the namo llllll addreu of the otW t..ocm Servicer and the a.ddrcu to which pl)'IDCZW &bould be made. The notice wUl also cantam any olher lnfomwlon RqUlrcU by appllcahlc law. (!. $) , JU '""'"'' ~ ~ ¢f (ffi!\'*tt1wA1 ,01011 PDoo • 111 a ~3040 0110 fr.ii./'.: . ,, )/i:'}2.: ( ~-1~2.: ,.,.t,,)!i.,!"··· 1:1 'tif ~ ~t~t~ ~.,:;'.;;,\l ·~~r:. ~ Iii <.''\j+,,·, I• :rt.:·:-:':'·.•, : .. ·.i);/\~:: ' •;;' ,.~ -· . . . . -;:,::;:;::-:,::;c~~::::i':7,'.'.'-::':i:::;;;~~::,;~:;o:;:=;;~:;::;~;;,;:::,::""'~"1"iillli'~ . ~· • . . ' . ' , ,?."•W· ~~P.~il;}~ ...... __ , ... ~··;::. ::~:~·,:~~~~~~::??~:;~~ :~:.~:.-:~•J:r~!~~:. .. .:r_.::.::.:~Y~?)f~:~:'.1~?e~!·:~f{.~1~~;~~~~r~~~:~~EJt-k~~,. -~~~:?:-~~~::ff ~~~~'.,~~i~*4~~~~~~~t~ 9::~\1 :; I . . b ·1' ·, ' I 20. Bamrdoull SUbstantcs. Borrower l1ull DOI CAUJC or pc,mll lbc pracaa:, uac, · dlspol&I, storage. or rel we or any Hmn1cNI Subltl:K'CI oo. or Iii Iha· Property. Bottower ahlll DOI. do, :ior allow aoyon., elaa to do. &ay,billg afTccilila we l'n>peny lllu 11 In vlolllloa of my l!ovlloamcmal Law. Tbo pra:odlng 1wo -.S lllloll .. 1 apply lO Ille P"""""'• "" or BlDT>&• oo the Property of llmll -•111,a of HazardDIII SubsWl<:<s lhU.,. genmlly """l.llilcd •.•be~ lO ooffllll reafdeallal uaa and lO 1lllinlc,w,cc of Ibo Propeny. · · · · · · · · Bom>wer 1l11dl Pfllllll'UY · lll>c l.clldcr \VlUlcll ooll<e of my IDvOllpuoa, cl&lm. dewad, l.awsul1 or other 1<1lon by my &<>ffllllllalLII or re111luory OJC!le)' or prlvMo PMY mlvllu! Ibo Property aod.my Hwrdoul Sutmanca or !!avlnmmcnW L:w or which Borrower Jm.JCtUal knowlafgc. Ir Borrower Jeum, or ii nottflcd.by any gomumenW or rquluory authorlty. lha& Ill)' mooval or other rcmed.lldoa ot any Hwnloua Sublllllee alloctlog. Iba Propeny i1 """"""'1', Bomwa !ball ·promplly 1w all nccc:s,ary .n:matlal Z<llom ia ""'"1WIOe wllb £:vlnmn>CGLII Ln. . · Al u1cd m th11· ~h. 20, "Hwn:lous SubJtanoe.s." are tbo&O mbltanccs ·definal u toxic or hwldoul IUbsw>a:, by l!DviloMlCZIIIIJ I.aw &lld Ibo followiJla IUbtlmca: ga,olloe, -.. oll!cr Oammabla or 1oalc peuvlcum Ptvducu. 1oxlc OCllicfdes and herbicides, volallla tolvmu, ma1erial.1 amllll11ng ubcslOa or /onml<ftl!yde, ml ...OCll:llve mw:rt~,. .u IISCd ln 11111 panpvph :ZO, 'l!:lvlnmmemaJ Law' 111<1111.1:rlenl 1 • .,,, ..S· 1,.,. or lho Jarudl<llon whcro 1114 l'n>peny 11 lowed 1h11 rdllt to bcallb, safety or cnvitonmcntll prati:ctJa11. . .. . , .. . .. . · . . . NCN•UNIFORl,I COVENANTIJ; BGmwer md L.cudcr Alnhcr covaw,umt ,aree u follow,: . 21. Aa:dtnlllan; Rcmedlm. LmdaliAU give aoako·10 Borrowao Dnor to aecduaUoa roUowtna llomm<r'1 breach of ,., .........., or""""""" lo. ,1111 s«aril7 '-'"' (1nll ..r prior Jo ·=-· und ... porasnipb 17 uolca 1ppllcahl< law .,...,1a .. oeh<rwtst). 1bc eollce ,mil q,odfY: (a) lllo ddeull; (b) Ill• adfot& roquJnd lo OIN lbe dd'ouff; (c) , . .rate, aot "" lhaa 30 don lrim llao dale tu notice la gbm to Bormwao, by Which tbe dctault musi be cared; ad (d) lhat talln to cure tlle dtfaalt on or Won tba date aPCCffled In the ootke 111111 ravlt In m:c:elenllca ot tbl llmll leCllltd t,y lllfl Smm'Y lmlnml"" and ale or 111 f'nlpeny at pn!ffe .-. •• o dale oot l<S1 lhan IZO do,a ta the nrturc. 1ltt aotlte ahaU furtber lntana Bottomr of the rlabt to nlmtat1 after accelfflltlon. tbt right to briq a court ccdoa to aart di, 11,,,.....ldfflCII of a default or any ot!lrr dcf'mse al Botroww 10 · a,i:d,nlloa a.ad ale, aad llllJ' Olba' 11111II01 "'IJlllred ta be ladudtd la the ood<e by oppllcabfe low. II Ille dtleafl II DOt Clffl!eoer beforetbedoleopeclfled In lllollOllce. Lmdet, at luoptloa, may require l:ilmcdlato po)'lllml la 1\111 or oil 1111111 .... .s by thlD Socurfty lmlnunml without flirl.hcr daaad and m&J' llmtke tbe power or sale and IIZIY. odaer n:rnedleo pennlttcd by 1pplkable law. Lmdcr tbaU be artlll<d to caUed oil .._.. IDcuffod In .,.,....., Ille ...,.u.,, provided lo lbio pmu;rapb ZI, lndudlDC. bul not llmlltd to, ra,oaable attomeya' tea 1111d COIN ur tJ1le nldence. · .. Ir Lmder lD.,okm &be power ot tale. l.c:ndtr llhall gl,e ·mum notice to Trustea ot the occ:m, aacc of an .. mt el defaaft.ud or Lender's d<dlon to .. .,. lhl Pn,p,ny to IN IIGl<L -and Laider olmll take -cc,Jon _..i1o, aotke or DIie and lllllll gl,e 1uclt IIOlla8 Jo Bom,wer and lo otll,r _.. u appllcebl1 law 1n17 r,quln. Mia' lhe time ft1l"lred h7 · oppllcoble Jow ood after pabllCAUon ot 1JJe aodCle or aal_e, 1'ri1lut, wit boat demand on Dommer, atiall ltll Ille Property at public oudlon lO lhl blgh«t bidder ol ltt1lme ond place ond ander lho lefflll desl&Dlltaf ID tile -.0 or Ali la ooe or moro puctl.s and la any order "trustee ddermlaa.. .Truaee my postpone ade or the ~ !or a oafod or -pcnulll<dby appllcablo IBw b7 pobUc ...... Clfflml DI lho time and ploco 11111d lo t&e DOllca •hale. Lender or ill delfaoeemar --""' ,,._ otmyale. Trume &ball dellffl' t..o tb1 pmi:basa Tnrscee'1 dffl:I COlm)'iDg &he 1'roDfflY 1lltbouS anr connant or. WDrnnlY, ~ or lmpUed. 1be ndtllll lu the Trustee'• deed IIMIU be i,rlma rac1,·erJdmce or tho lnnb of lho "810DmU mado lherda. l'rs,e llaall applJ. Cbc pn,aal, of lhe ,ale la the folio~ ontor: <•> lo ell a-ot lb< sale. lndudlee, Ind aot llililled lo, ..,..rm1,1, Trulleo'• oad 111on1.,. ,..., a,J 10 .u ..... IOCIIIOd by lbb Sec11111y 1mitrumoo11 IDd (cl .., ...... 1. t11e -.. _. l,pllr ,adUed lo U or lo Ibo dcrk of lllt aq,orior -of Ibo CGUOIJ' ia "bfdl lhe mle took pLu:i,. 22. R...,,,.,oyaec:o. Upon P'~":,"'~1111 IUllU K<l1ffli by 1h11 Sccurll)' llumlmonl, Lender lhall ~~~:..~~-~~~!!' ~~~l~~"~~~~~,~l!n~= wamnl)' 10 lhe """°" or pmc,111 l<PJly Ollllled lO It. SUc/J penw or po,rom ...,J Pl!' 11fY """""'11111 caw. l.udtr m•Y dwl• IUCli pcrwo or pmcm • Ice for reconv,,iu lhc Propeny, bUl cmly II lhe fee b paid lO e lhlnl pany (-11 lho Trwtee) rormvl= r:udcred and tho dliJgiag ol lhc fee II pcrmlued w,.:Cr applicable IIW. 23, Substlhde Tnalee. ID aa:ordaact wtz.Ja appllClblc law, Leader may nvm 1lme to dme tq,polut a .uca:ssor .trw.iu 10 any Trustee appolnted bcreunder wbo bu ceased '° act. Whhout conveywe of the Propcrt)', tbc ,ueccs.sor tnutee &ball luc:cccdto all the tllle, power and dullcs mnftm:d upon Tmttce berelo end by applli:able law. 24. u .. of l'n,pulJ, 1be l'n>peny It DOI lllOd prlllclpall1· for agrlo,lwnl or fanolog P'l!P"IOS, t!. J.,,. m 1n1t1,,·=~~ ... ~-GH(WAl1970II Pagc,7of8 'RJt ~30489/90 00 .. WAI ·/' . h . ' . ' = = l I ' ' ! I'" •. -~,.:·. 25, Rlckn tu lhb Securlty lmtnunui. If unc Qr more ridcn are c.ucutcd by Bom,wcr and m:ordc:d lOgClhcr wilh lhlJ Sccurily iaJUWDClll, lho Cl>VClllllll ,nd IIJlfflll"!IU Of ead! oucb nder ahall be ill<:orponu,d Into 111d &ball amend 11111 oupplcmeot lilt a,vcoanu 111d q=nu ol lhi1 Sec111ily IDSUUmt:111 u I! lhc ridc1(1) wm, a pan orlltlt Secutfly en,...,.,.. (Clc:clc applicable bex(ea)J ~ Adjuatablc Ible Rider ~Coadomlnium Rider § 1-4 Family Rider Ondlialcd Paymcnl Rider PIIDllcd Ullil Dcvclopmml Rider Blwccldy Payment RW,r Ballaoa Rider !Ille lmpro•=• Rider Sc<ond Homo Rider VA Rid<r Olhcri11(,pccllyJ Occupancy Rider BY SIONINO BELOW, Dor= ""'pu 111d l&1'<I to lht lOIIDI lllll COYCllCII conllliacd ill lhlt Sccurily laJUUmenl 111d h, IIIY ride,{1) Cltallcd l>y llonowcr ,nd mm,ial wllh it. Wltacw:a: ___________ (Seal) -___________ (Seal) •Dorraftr ___________ (Seal) Sl'ATE OF W ASIIJNGTON Coualy ot KING On lbb day pcnoc.olly appwcd be(ote ... RGB!RT A MAIR AND CLYD!RAE MAIR ... ..: _,p;.µ~· -'-'-.:::C()-"~:.C:~'--·---'Sc:,l) ROBERT A. IIIIR .no.-., Lz::::~ .... ~d,:w;.,.:,t,d....._, ... JY2LI.<-=<~ ... 1:..__(Seol) CI.YOEIIAI: MIR · ....... , ___________ (Sc:,l) ......... (Seal) -ianuwer ___________ ,(Seal) ........ to UJO knowa to be the lodlvldual s docrlbod In and wflo =tcd lllc wlfllln and fon:ialnc iastnrmem, and aclmowlcdgal WI '!BEY ~p,cd the"""'.. 'IBEIR Cree and YDIWIIII)' ... 1111d dMI, !or the mes and pwpo1e1 thcn:111 ... doncd, GIVEN uader my hllld and atncW IC.Ii lhiJ 2/8/98 @L -8HIWAI (97011 P•o• 8 or 11 Farm 3048 IIIO ·w . ..-:' :~i~ ·. l~ : l . ~-.,. , .•. I' ~. \ ~- • • C _i ... ' ' J. CALCULATING TIIE NEW PAYMENT AMOUNT Provided I.ho New. Note Rate a e.alculated ID Sed.lon 3 above h aol grtllm' lbaD 5 pcrccn1agc polnU above the Note Ra<c and all Olbcr condltio., Rqnb,od In Section 211,o,e ,.. lllilQed, Ibo No<c lloldcr wlll ddamlnc 1hc amount or tho C10nlh.ly payment 1h11 wiJI be mfficlcnt to rq,ay l.n full (a) Lbc unp&ld principal, plwi (ti) occnied but unplld ln....,r, plu. (c) all odJer 1111m I wJU ..,.111111., tbe Note Ille! Sccwtry wtrnmom on Ibo MIINriry Due (UMD!ag my monthly paymeo11 ...,. .,. cumm, u ,oqulml Wlder Sec:tloo 2 above), °"' the u:rm or the New Nine III lhc New Noto. Rate in equ,J monthly ,aymana. nc result of 1hfl calculation will ho lha amount of my ""'principal and lnteroar paymen1 ovmy malllh wnll the New Nore Is fully paid. 4. EXERCISING 11IE CONDfflONAL REFINANCING Ol'DON 1bc Nole HotdcrwiU notify me 11. Jwt 60 adc:udar day, In advance or the Maturity Date and Advlse me or the prillclp>I, ,cuucd but unpaid lolmst, and all oilier sums I uo ,.pcc1Cd to owe on Ille MIINriry Oue. '!be Note Holder also wlll advise mo 1h11 I may e,<erci.c the Condlriocal Refltl.1ndnS Option if the condlrlona in Scalon 2 above an: m:r. Tbc Note Holder wW provld:: my paymem rocord in(onDllion. logClher w!th the name, dtlo and nddta1 of the pa,cm rcp""'"iiJJ& tho Note Holder thll I musr riollry in order to '"""lie the Conditional Rcllaanciag: Opdon.. 11 l mt.et the condhloas of Scccfoa 2 above, l may exercise the CoudJtional Redmncins Oprlon by oorl!ylaa the Note lloltlct oo l111Cr than 45 c,leodar d1y1 prior to tho M11uriry Date. 'Ille No~ Holder will calculate tho Qud New Nena Rite bllecl upon the Fc:dcnl Nlllonal Mongage Assocllllion'a appllcablo publllhod iequlml net yield In eflcct on tho dale and lime ol day notific:allou la rcoclvc:d by the Nore Holder and u c:nlculalod In Sc<tlon J above. I will then bavo 30 Clllmdarday1 lO provide tho Noao Holder with m:cq>tablo proof of my iequlrc:d ownmhlp, oo:upaacy and prvperry lien 1111ua. Bcforv tho Marutlty Daro the Noto llolclc:r will advise me or lbc new lctcn:st rate (lhc New Note Rate). fr# monthly payment amounc and a dale. tlmo and pl"" II which I mllll appear 10 sign '"Y dccumc:nll Rqulrc:d lO complete tbe rcquln:d rclkw,c:lng. l Ulldentlmd the: Nore Holder will cllorge m: a $150 p,oowlog fee, lhc COIII usocllled with updlllng the IIUc I0111n111CO policy, If any, wl any l'CIIOTllble third-party cosu. auch u docurncn141y atmnps, lDlanalble t11, aurvey, recanilng reca, etc. BY S(GNINO BELOW, Bom:,wcr accepts 111d agRCI to WI ICfflll And covenants contained la lbls Bal.(0011 Rider. <@-t4 Q. 7/(a,j< ROBBRT A. alR MUL'JlSl"AU IWJDON RIDER, S'.qlc Family ODS.Dll . . 1/Z<{ /'(7 DATB (Sign Origin.al Only) rom1 JIii U/19 P111e2ol2 /··:"•,,'.'_'_ :• Ii ' ....... , i :!?~---:":. ::/~\)\\ ;·: •.•• , •'.:;,,: '.~!'':l/i'.:'•;·,,:5·Yt..:P:f ;~~,;(,1Y\':~~Ws"i,?!Jf~ii'if"h'.~i;ji#'.;:,;."l.~-:'.~~!1~:''~: :~w:~~·~;:;;;~~f~;)~,t.~i.~~!11~;~·· "''". • 1 • • ' . ,, ' -· ~. ,•> .: Lam Number. JIIA-11028 OWNER OCCUPANCY RIDl'.R Tub rider ii made lhlo 18TH day of JULY. 1997 and b incorpontal Into and shall be deemed In llllCnd 1111d 111PPICl!lCl1t I Deed al Trust c!ol<d o! CVCII date bcrcwllh, <OVCtUIS lhc prapcny dcsaibcd dtco:Jn II: 1HE NOIITII HAlF OF 1HE ,amt HALF OF 1HE Hll!'JIIIIEST OUAR1ER OF Tl£ fllRIINEST llUARIDI OF 1HE S001ll£AST QU!RllJI OF SECTION 14, lMSll!P 23 NOR111, RANG£ S EAST, U.H.. IN KING CllUN1Y. WASHINIITTIH: EXaPT 11£ IIEST 30 FUT COIMYED 10 KING CIIUIIIY !It DEED RECCIUJ£D IMD!R KING COtMY REClll!D!NG NO. 10!14243. BorrmYCnS ,grm &hat this rider ii befog given u com:idcralion to Leader for g;nnling Joan 10 Bom,wer(a), ADd for the purpose or Bottowtr(1) maldo& r.ettain catillcatlom, qrecmc:nu nw1 repre:senwlons to Lender regudlnc occupancy of Ibo above rcfcm:d to property. Bonuwcr(1) undmr:mds IDd agrm tha1 Leaders aole laduccmcnr. ror gmmlng a loan on the 11Ubjcc:t pn,pcny ii based upon illll n:!lmco upo,, lhc lollowlns: Tbc lwlda rcprescmlng lhe loan proacdJ 11< obUlocd by Lcllder apoa Ala ollho lmn to lho FNfcnl Homo Loan Mon1"1" C.lpO<>lion ("Fff!MC") or Che FodmJ Nadond MoJl,!11,!0 Alsoclatloa ("FNMA") or Liauiu,~ ;.;.:.:.:-..-.. FHLMC. FNMA and ln.sdtutional Javcslon require, as a condltiotl IO purdwi.n1 lbc loan th.al, amons other lhinp, Iha Bonvwci(o) oa:upy lhe onbjccl property H 1 .. year-round primmy ""1dcncc. Bormm(1) baciD a:n!Dca under pcadty or perjury lhat llom>wer(1) bm:in lhail occupy lho aubjcct prupe11y m ha )'Cllt·rouAd primary residam:c. aDd Ihm the oer:upancy by Bom:iwer(1) &hall occur not 181CI' lhan thiny (JD) day• oner !uudlag or lhil 101n. Borrower(~) undcntands dud fllilun: lo comply with elb provision ahall comcltute a dd°IUII under the lffl!II or the Ott.id orTrus1 w wbicb thlJ ridtt ls anoC'l1cd, ml shDi.l immedllldy sivc rise to Lender's cnroro:mcnt ol tl1 rights under lbc (orcdosurc and power oC Illa provisions tmder lllid Deed ofTrut1. We undcrsland ud agn:a th,c (rom IJmc let lime the Lender may require, and Borrowcr(s) shall fllmbh, documcnwioo or proof ac:cepllble 10 Lender at OW' coad.aucd occupancy of the subjcc;l property. e...f). 111. f .Q'.,?11: DDS.Cl.3 1,. • .,;.' -~ , .• •.. ~:.~;~~/?·:}):'.." .. ,' .. i.. ,';. j ,•'I. ··' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we bm:by certify 1h11 all or the forqolng """""'" arc tnic and cumd. RO~Ql ?;tr;,,.), 1f~~t£ ~~' /Ylµu 1/z<1h7 CL ' DAIE sw. or WASHINGTON KING c .... 1yss. On __ 1_1_24_f_9_1 ________ bcfon: me, tbe undersigned, a Nowy Public In and ror uid Staie. pmoaallyappumt _______________________ _ ROBERT A HAIR AND CL YDERAE HAIR knowa 10 me 10 be Illa pcnoa(1) whose 111111C(1) _ _., ... ,.._ ___ ,aubtcribod 10 the ron:goiq wUU!llCll lllld ac.t.nowtedp: that ---TI-IEY _____ -'--------•Olleaitcd lbo same. WITNESS .., band 1111d orridu ,cal: 00,.CU V NOTAAVPUIWC lfATE OF WA.\HINQTON ""'"'""' M¥" Agpcwin'IOnt EIPfM ffB 28. \991 P1111or2 ;f!f Jt: .;~ ~ ' l ,:;;;·i ;\~' cl ~"4 .. ~ ~~~1[ ·¥Ji~;: " J~. ~ .t1fi/ l',) ·, ,. ·'-' .~~t·~t. ~: 'tfit·-:.: .· .~?l~i· p ~it~~·:.~ f~!'.fi:} .. ·' { ·:.:,. ."::"'··· ·;·//.:,:· :'.';~· --.-. -.,;,_-_. ;~;:::..:~·7 .. :~~-~,7i'~_,~.~~",;"!;:"J'r7.;~~:~":1~.:;~:;~}~i~::~/~~· '.'7~.~'.~~·;.:~,_::,,~\~·.:.i~r.-t~~.~~.t~,~-.~~.;;:"~~:;;~,.: •. :: .. ~:::~1?:.,?~,:~;~·~=t~f.:-"~(;;1-:-r:'~~~~;=·:.,:".~,.":~~:~~··;':':~·~~·->u:,···:~t:FIE1;~iY?0Vit%ff!Lf.JJ.~~,~{~~ K.C. D.Q'.E.S . . . . . , ,;, .• , r day.of ;i;..L.£ .· .. ;-. . ,,,e: •'(? ~ ... : ~·Ii· P~~l'llrld onc1 lo!:i::1~ . . .. "l"" --··:.·-1;_· -:-:::·<~·-.. . . · ... · ,. ' . ---1~) .......... ·-MAIN F11.E co.:pv_::/ . ............ ·, .. \~'· ···; .:., \:·< -. • RUG-21-2001 12:22 FRO~· TNT (BELLEVUE) COMMERCIAL TO 94863273 ,•.:,.. -··:; .. : a:: . t: ·o: -. .e . " . ·-· .. 11)· I I . I I I ' IIECOR0£1) .. 1/0L . .. . . . llr. 'PACE..:_· ... -REOUF.ST or ~ ;;/j't 22 Pt:! . 2 08 ·.~. I· I i .,tl.lERr A. M;kl<!S AU01ioR .Y;l~C CO'JN'~.WASH. . I ' ! I .. ··.-··:··············.·--·· :tpury ',-... ·-.... ···-~· . ·-·-... r'oa• L!III Statutory Wmxanty Deed -· ... ---····· · TIIE G~ASJ'OR5, ~ H. llf!limICIS iiDd. VIOIA. ·E. HlOOJ!\ICXS, .hi• '1i!e, . . '·-~~···" ro, &nd 1n c1,n~idC"~Ai1on ·01 va1uable. c~~.~l"Ations and Ten (U0.00) Dollal"s . ·'r.~'1~ . in halld paid, conwys and WAIT;lftll 1Ct .RCGER'L""'.: ·CHA.HDm and ltAJtY A.. CHANDIZR. hi:s "'1.f'e, .·~" '1ol~g d~ribed re~ t!~t,;; $i1~1~·-.;j~·~hc~~·n;y or lCiri.p; •. " Stale of · Wulli"Crmt.:, ·. · . The -,t 1udi''(Filt): ~1' the nort~ot quarter (JN l/4) of thil •outheg,it quarter (SE l/4) or section Fl>m"teen (1.4), Tom'18h.1p Twont7-t!Ne (23) North, l!ange Fi.,e (5) E.'11.ll'., 0 ·1!:XCEPT County Road • • ' ,. .. " . ' '• ,, :, RUG-21-2001 12:23 ,, FROM (BELLEVUE) COMMERCIAL TO ~ 0. ~ trJli) .cmia 0. ~ b&o "'"' ••. ..,.., ... ,"" '"illbl 1b" ·1111,\'.U,.l!!lr,· · · ' L l)" ~ \\'IT~t-:."-'-t-:111: 'l'h.1.1 1hs .U'1' .,,_. 1n -'11n dw~41'f'odl1b.1lflll'l'baNr~1opwrta..-.1"rhr ·• '"°'" 11"' r .. 11.owin~ •~rdwd. ~ 06IDIS, '7idt. ~ af:11'1'~ akwaw b• tho .em.as, uf Jl&s::) , .... t.~t ..... f \\'.i~, lc.•wi1: ~ ~ cJ ---~' !, ~ 1/4 d 8lo ltrili&WI 1/t> o0 C:::0 • , ,,. .,.c, U!I GIi ~ l!A, 1 ¥ll 119 lllillNilll! ~ .fil lbllll ar.a., a us ..., llBUc=:u a • ·as ... Cll:o ~ ,,_ ell ~ • +!!!! l'iiill BIi\ ea *' liiii 1 · ·· ~ ca 1t:o e · 3 CM ~I ~ ~ 9"111•11&0 11,oa aki!G doz> i!laoG U.,,, d -" &p S el 11/6 oa obo -~ IA <>II It:::> m,,,,;o .m"'I l/1!> llD.611 llEell c,; l!Bla _,. 91;115a· d t31'31'111lii]I ~ 1llat,Ul, GS"fn •r ~ , uoi = a flllNll 1am.i oa _.. a · r ,.., 116 oa ., , lll>J 7 1• 116 oi $<1 Q: .. • ljl6, Cll:11,,ftb -. """"' °"' -· m .......... 1*"' oil odd 94863273 o • u,oi l/6 a11 a L ..... ct 1~ oa ma 1 r n 1141 lltaaD 11a11a11 "7'119" a.oa o!,o:DQ Ibo 11120• Uc:> oa ""8d u ,..., a o 116 ..a tl!lm Du. I&. , a ~ a4 vllli> T IMM 116 • !IM.Giil 11:cQ s If><= 0:..mti l!ll"e7'm" !hl:sn u=,oU,o1 "" °""' ~ uni> llilll.n ,._, """"' c, *"• co 111",o llo<lt 1lc:> of e:, m1.c3 """I · . at I.It> oil mo --1'6 oil lb!! la •• • lA1 t!amoo ll=1t, o°as •21• Qeoi,, "'= 11£:o lldt u,,o of ""'1d ~ &A ail -llt>iia&::.o,:i4 l/6 oa dio ~. 114 llll7 Seo• a:c, *" """' i;::,BD& oa "">l!llrntno; 1lllllllilW ~ e:iod1 Ol!.tcOUD 1c Ibo O:>:,,cy of Wea, a"""' ell~- D1dt.)act t., nee : 1ta, ,ooc:r1ctla=o aml ro.aarvoU,a:.3g 1 ot: roc:onl, i ~11• :,·! ui. ,md • ,..11,1!11.11111, ul lh1• c1.1111r.1,·t .:an ;i. h,11, •··. l lur 11ur.:h:u• l'ri~c j,. '2a3Dtv 'Iman 1Z'(A;OIY1P tnm HIFSl1ffiil!, A11D C111>t1ao-,.-.......... -...................... -($ 2s.,co.ao , Un11an ..• , •hi·· 1BWZB TFO!J'3A!ll) P'1VB IJIOD31IP &SD H0/100.··· .. ··----·-···-·t:ii 3.JGD.00 , JJoJlar• 1· •• ! ... , a 1'41.J, 1•, •. 11, ,·.1,1 lo\ho•r ... ,f i• h.,,ttL~· :.,·kuuM·1• •l;.:,...1. aurl lhr b1r,1D11ct vf .aid 11ur, b:1111t 1ir•..:• ..h~U be JCllld :a .. , 1 .• ""-CC!l ltt"isJt'MII 'm1Dl'i' l7ffi l!ZJ CDl1~-----.. ·---------,s u,.a:a , Dlllbr!io .. • 111··~··,•11,-rl"'i""'''',. Jtb d;&fnl b:Zl .1~\U ,a.,W. m Pil$D3!!P t:lillJi'r 1'1.W b!!!J J:D/LOO U5, 00 . ; i. ·,,,, • .• r 1:1t•r•·. ,,1,, .r • -·i,•1•· :t... 71tl ,L,r .. r ea,h :m•I r~crY RILll1th 1Mn1:dt4'r 1111111 •'.,• ,•:,:•r• '"I!'• ]•..1., ; r,,., m•]\11li:JS: i11•••r1...a IICI (i;r :.11:1,,,i1l 1ul"lioft f)wfl"uf :U tl1r t::llt' 01{ ·,u (6) 1"."f 1'1'111 1...r .. · r:.:111. !,.: !w•f',: i•1!:·, ; ... ·.! rl'"' u,r.u•h:.,· 1•:1\·tu,·!11 hrr .. 1:, 1•n•\·t,l,•1I ~i.ill ir14;l11•leo l,.,4., prin,i1oi1l anJ i111rrf' .. t. -;11111 11.,.•··?.•·. :-.,·.11:,•,1 ~· 1~ 1;·:·'1,·,l lihl i., ... ,r.,,..J ,111,.rr•I ;\HJ 111< habuv·t :a1,plicd to11rln,,li:ir.l :r,1,.,, .• 1 , .. t.,.·m ,i.,, ti" 7u:t,I.:.:: ,.j Ua, . 1; 63. o:.uac:,o to t:o eoll•t:c:1 ac -pi..,a <loa&s,oc,,;) I'S' .,,,11,.., l.n crttlbe. llollaro 4D ~ Ill'""• a:d:O ~ iuo~ oi,cta to r;m • coo "" moto1J ""° cno, """" or 1000, of c,,Uar'a =-t:1 .s,ioi> cj2j,>t.,,o sol>jell _,rtv m .,. .,...ci,. le,;;a.t ~ oo foltc:::>; 1l>at = •II S \/t, of CiEI l/6 ..S Ill!! aJ6 oil Gl.<!,,llllB.-. In KSDll tllO. ,mi., dlo<J• .. I.bod oo 2o11=1 lila,(3 oc cbo lliil ea,r ., ""~-.:ao: l!J II O"lls'll" a o1Q ar.o II la ol od cabdf.vt.Gic:::1,. 60.t!(P co Ibo a= i¢:l al Q:I' afl 1c:::rJ ~ ~t ~ cmtfrlno O o•as•zr• 0 ala~ n ta 67": lb O oo•w•SCJ .. 1' i,=cllal co Ibo D la oa cQ ~"1.ol,co., l?Ql\,.Qa•; $ 0 0•21·as .. a 6l'' • t:11 o LJO°O?•,o• n FQO"Ollol .tlb ttx:, o 1c. .a ~ t S?"ulo&e:J. Ci3,®' m:rs. 1te1 tho,.._ RC 11!1111JW ""="7 -· IIIJRD Oi)dcO to o:::,lrc ft"" ,coao bo::l d<>OQ of i,;;:ril 17,1 ';.\"' .. 1,' ... · , •• • .:o '., ... r, ,r , .,i, , ··••nl ta, 1 •• 111· .,,i;:q:, ... ur ,,dart, .... ..i.u .. li•ll( C"1> .td1!,r.1,,· ,. • . : ;· ;: :,., -li'T -! .... ·: .... \0 1111:!,·,I t••·• ,J,Td., ~u!•)••ct 1,,.-.,l l"la.:1111ll,1.a·,, ,~, I"' \1,:1·•i 1•1:1 :,a-.·1 • 1q;•• ••. ;n,U1?111, ?II~ r, .,111r,•,: •·I I, 1:1 I, .. I, ""::r:i,·t 'j,.· , ' : ... "! · '.:. : :, 1:,.. • 1: ,·t·•t• ··• •.. , : 1,n n ..... ,. s-,1 •:.••l· •.j • \t..·~•11i:, 1qli....,:, u,hrf,.,v-,;, tt111,u" .: t • :i·, : .:::··· .· .... , !• •! ·I , .. ,, ••. \:!1 .. ·-.·1 '. .,.'.,' · •., •,1 ,: .. ~11 • • Ii. ,11 ••f .,i,-., ll1'1~1r1•,, 11,, •,1. ;;, ~ •'" .... ,I .'.•,,•! ,., ,Tt•~ .. 1 ·h .. ,.,; , .. : ,.f ~i' :·r,nn-,·-.. , au)' t ... rt Uw1 ... ·i ,,,r 1•1.ol,lh ... ,. ; ·..:•,. •ti·'·' :·::i;,.·,n,.;\I .; •1 • ,,· 1·•lr,h1~C" pri.f', tn ~' ,Ill l,11,l,L::,.,:. ,,, . ._,.f ,lr•·f·.~~.• ·•, • •f, lf•I', •. ," .. • •p I,,• :._A.'\l~l11 ••.-,ll/",'III,':.•\, •;I•),.,,. ••,•:.•~R .. t: --~&T·~ ·1111-:hl"rl••r'•'••ll••l•l1,11.a.ll .. ... .. . ... . n A. w D , •1,,1 •. ,,.,',. 1r,••~ -tokdl,,1l.r1~11,1,., .. ,1,.•,.m,,lr •·,, f, ·, .... , ... ,,.• •. i·:~1~ ......... •iht·r ~.1b '''"'''"~ 11 .... ,,..,., r,.,m •L.lr •• • · ,I , ...... , !,•:· ·' l•l l•'I .... ..,.....,.11, ... "11i11•-al.\r 1·~ thr IIU~ll.ll ..... ,,n ·'··""""; t'·, I f•;•"•I 1~,. -\I,.• rn~·•;t..,,.,~~f auc-f11l,,ia01\t ~-·~J!(T l'U,es''fJ¢l,~ ~ ,;,. > ( P'fr::ii!=1 ffl". • · ra 1 6 iJ?!l , P.04/05 ,.;; r-,q :3' r- in in \aL.iG-21-2001 FRO!" .,IT CBELLEVUE J COMMERCIAL . T. O _ _A. liill~«~n.o»n. ', 1 ..... Tit,~ =3,i::, Coll ie::J ! 1 ol cl:l~~ !:,ii t:= ~ wd d,,s~dlO ell=r -....c.;:.obll b I:::!:!"'""'==~~ . ......,..,,.,..,,~""""°'"""""'"'""' .... , <:I-Ct, ....,.,..,..,, ta,tJ · i 1' c:, ~ t::!:io C, """'°"'. cf OJI I ,diod .. lo ir> """'"II -, ~ .. Od~ai;::,;, ol ll!!o-. 'lb~ cb!I '""° (:o ~ a, c::::1!:1 ~i;ar:rnsoe<>bl' Ill:, coe., .,-. .. ~no, ....,,,..u. ~c,.. '·'"''D~c,;:)l!:::::,c:,e!:,~,C!tllbl'c,:cl,pp:::,t11t,..,-o!!G::,o,I ...... ·, ""it;;,"""""" cool d=o..t ~ · Tl:o coC;o l:v:o ~ c:, "= ti!1!:!n do&7 c;;o Incl tl:\::o t;,,,;d, 10 "*""' ,-W~ 1·,i.- 1,........, 0o:::i,o.,, • ~ (lll!!o3' of 1ills l:>ooleRw, ~ lb~ ., u:, foll n=i1 ., .......... ~ l'ffll'I oe:=:, t:=a ~ t:;, ,= al oi.., lo Ibo llllo or u,o i:o!!D ,o 11:J did dc,crll= .-..w• •A hf.._,. ol fOlot l!,co ... os=:::::! to, II:, po-a,,dor Ila• ~ . ,,,_ --OIi lvll 1>11,coa, of ,ol,1 pa,<l1o,,"""' ID_,. ---"""·On ....... •-••' J.-.itbofin,,,,ectidtapurclla.w,ra~Gnll•ftkiel\l lft.t~r dfedol laid~ pmni4.,,i, d,Jf11 l.tll llt, lll'M'iMAAh ................. , ... Timrktal ft-~of,tv& NMUr.l,l.'t. ln<noll' lhe pu.rdlac:::talJ futo..a::,11, aa, po.t11..-11 ul dw •.11111 1,1ml1,,·· 1•r1C¥ 111'11:11q111'.4' at ltw tia:tt tho taQtt slYlt fall 4u::J V ~f(IIO llll:ldA,it. OS ~ly I~ 1.ll't'fur ... iUly • "l',it:i,:,m 14 a.tf'W'lmal &~'1. 1bo ..«Jrr aa, ~ 10 ~ tc:ariciSu,o a.ad maa:i,Qntluft of fl:1i• nMllnaN :uul "l" .. , ,11, Ii ~'"''""" 1.,,nc ,..S, an "IPI'• o,f nw pan-ha;er hrfw'Undff lh;aJI ~ abd Ckffllitw ..... .:a fly p:a,....., •• tllll'f"f"(o1f,.,. ... 1.h~\r l~H"lrr ~ 1lw plln...._t ~ti hil' tc"4:.inrd, b11hf' IIO(le,r ifl liquidation O( IU ,tumc,,,~ ,u,1,1iOc•I I~ '"'~"''ll .. , t.Urh. hiib,l.'1'1' ~h·,, .. r lit d.1·n~mcl:1o. no1cin·'!I ,,, olhrt pa,....-. wil'h ~·t lo WK'h jl,,•d.1,-.i1i•.u •• r 1 .. ,l"t111r ;iud ,·~••·"11Jt9'at1 m:ay I"' 111;&olr lr,i, r~i-c~ HWiil al 1tw l..lki'#ma' DU,11"""4, l"'w11: lllOU • ,_ ""'>, o.n., =• ~ or ;u ..udi ualwt ~ddro, ~· 1hr 1,un.·h.l~t will intJH-:a1r i,1 wrltiu::JIOdttll.'llrt. Or 1hr ..eRtr Aat dn1 w l,1i1,,: ~' 111,u. '" .:a..·1aat'1t, ,111 aa1 i111d1iwohia1,i ,wuwlut:' i1b121Umrni;, (.II oa arr, p:i,m:ffll, •Jr ~,....11-,. ms,k 11)' U• -elk-r ;u,d n'Ja,alt&-11',t ,1~ Flf'ila!ld, i1 1 .. laa: ..._ipulawJ 1b.11 1'w ~uli't'nllAI w par il'IJcnnr•lii61e inra.alban1h or 1,1 j.r.l)" 11r,n" ""llili,"'-l1~· the-pv,-.·ta~r. n•· i111.lt;•11df'OI lJ,r 1hr <:V'·e11i1111, t,u d.1:11,;c a Uft'il that d'l"JY :..ikil :111;..i.1 1• an ... -.1111, ;v1""•'K Uo"t ~',,,af;n,.; fur the rir,.,"·rl")· ,,f RIOl'll'J' u11l7, a, H UW pt'QEUM \0 pay lmd lwm H~ irt a Jiffll"l'rfli in._..ru,iwnt, ;and INl1 n,., "u,·h :w.·1inn J1;lll ,·utbl.ituH ilU dectioa. ltflll ID P")CWd llllhrf'altm' :h t.:i .tUJ ...ut, ... •,iun1, ,k·rautt. :11111 ~ W'"lliu•r 1,~· 1hC" ...,\In .,f ;uiy ,Ida.uh un 1h.!-p:in af thr. p..:rdu~ Ju.II be: conkltm:•I :I• :r, •·!J•\·,·r ,,l 2111:r ~•b-,.t,,,iu .. ,11 drh,1111 • . . In .11\}. wu nr ;a1:1iun '"' fl'l'lliffl' ;i.n~,, C11W11Pt u( 1hi11 conlNlt't or '" a1n«1 any in~1.:dlm,n1 p;Si~"fflf'lll 4lf 311:i-· rb:arei- '••~ itwt-,-lrnm. 1Ar 1,ur, h:1,-..r lllt"'" to r,=t)' 11 rr;a-ablr ~ u :UlurJW"Y'11 fN'!l lllnd :afl '~" 1M r,:1,.Di'll""io '" 1uonft'l;.~ ""ith cui·h ~it. :,.od ;J.1 lh,, rn.cnn:ahlr th'\I ur V'ilrc:bin,, m-Drd•, which ~tt.1 !Ul&JI br WI,~ In afly iuJm--i1 u, """'"' •·1~......t in 111rb -it. :""f .. \·1r:. <ii'" W,-\:,,.lll~',;·1, •S. l "· Countll' ,,f 11J.aa. tu n.e k.11 .. wn h, ,_. 1h• i1,,iivi,hub ,\1•"""·ril~"I iu :aruJ 1o1:l1·, ,:,,rtt·1!w,! 111" w:1hi11 ,., .. 1 j,.,...1.:,,i,,r, i1,.J<1:u.,.,,1, ,., .. t .ll'i.~•·l,.,h_ .. -.l tt1"1 r.boy i:i'lt"lf'U 11,r !l.1mr;i,, thol'l" !n'I!' au,! \'n\unt:ar.\" ;.,•1 ~111! ,11-,,..t iur •ht' u~ ~"d 1111r1111 ..... tlw-rrin nrniiunr<t. ~/ i a l i !r1 f >' "' ' ~ ~,\Cf···-·---. F' w o: J \'..J' c ... zi • c;!"' .. ' 0 • ·--· •• ___ I : • .. ,, ;; ,. ~ " ' u § ; ·: 1 imj I· ., 0 i ,c ' .; f 1~ .~ "1-, 7 i',1 3".I I~..: ,:6 C 9i: ii i ! :;; ...... l ~i! w . -~LI I f ; -jj g:: s 5 ~· ;.:;~ :e ~ I s 0 • r:1:. ~ _;.:i .:: I ., c:.:: :1 ml I <;:)! : '.,.., -• r I . ··_1 ,\-.J' i ' J< ' ' I I I 94853273 TOTAL R.05 . ' .... ~ 22617-8"' Dr. SE CENTURION DEVELOPMENT Bothell, WA 98021 SERVICES (425) 486-2563 OFF 1425\ 486-3273 FAX Karen Scharer King County ODES Land Use Services September 6, 2001 [m@©@~W@'[)' SEP O Ii 2001 ~ 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW. Renton, WA 98055 RE: Zoning Reclassification and Proposed Plat of Evendell DOES File #'s L01 P0016 and L01TY401 Dear Karen: K.C. D.D.E.S. In response to your Notice of Incomplete Application letter dated August 3, 2001 please find attached the following information: 1. Three copies of title documents establishing the legal lot status of the parcels comprising the referenced plaUrezone application. Please note that a Statutory Warrantee Deed dated May ?1h, 1963 established the eastern portion of the project property (parcel B) in its' current state. A larger original parcel was established as early as April 2?1h, 1950. With regard to the Mair parcel (parcel A) please note a Statutory Warrantee Deed dated November 21•1, 1949 established this portion of the project property. 2. Three copies of a title report containing a revised legal description to include all of the western property (parcel A). 3. 8 copies of page 1 of the Zone Reclassification Application Information and Justification Questionnaire with the acreage revised to reflect the entire western parcel (a.k.a. "Mair" or Parcel 'A' as shown on the 75-lot plat map). 4. 1 O copies of the plat map for the 75-lot proposal revised as follows: a. legal description revised to include all of the western parcel (parcel A), b. all nearby right of way widths shown c. all nearby roads labeled, d. all located easements shown, e. inclusion of a note indicating that a boundary line adjustment will be performed after plaUrezone approval to achieve the final configuration indicated on the plat map. I "Let us take the load. " MAINFlLE~@ Karen Scharer September 6, 2001 Page 2 of 2 5. 10 copies of the alternative 44 lot plat with the lots consecutively numbered and the widths of all nearby right of ways labeled. 6. Reductions of both revised plat maps for inclusion in the land use notices. Please note that the plat maps are both stamped by a Licensed Surveyor and ownership information in conformance with the Transfer of Applicant Status form submitted with the original package is indicated. Please call me at (425) 486-2563 if you have any questions or require additional information. I look forward to working with you on this new residential project. Thank you. Enclosures Sincerely, CENTURION DEVELOPMENT S Michael J. Romano Project Consultant "let us take the load. ·· ... ' King County DOES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest· Renton; WA 98p55 DROP-OFF FOR LUSD ONLY Cover Sheet *******************IMPORTANT************~·**** Portion Below MUST BE complete for all drop-off to KC LUSD Staff Project No. Lt>IPCc?/6 /Lo17Y";(o/ Project Name .fi'"'//i:'11/ Ot.:LL, FROM: .C:1=.A/'/V/Z,o,v 0LV£Lu,'U l::>./r Q;:ev/ci:S . Company Name/}=onta~t Person /14,"Ke-.EaM'1WO Telephone No. (:L_?r._L y//.-Zn! TO: /CA/21:N ~.eJe'.., Date Received by LUSD · D ~t~~W~fl) SEP O 6 2001 UdJ K.C. D.D.E.S. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KC STAFF Short Plat !1!!iilJ) . . . · · ~is;i~if?~1$Z. Lot Line diustment Permit . .. · Please specify item(s) drop-off · Right of Way Permit Please specify item(s) drop-off Grading/Gearing Permit Additional Inf. requested, please specify item(s) drop-off· Other:·----------------------------- ****NOTE****** If what you arc dropping off is not given on this cover sheet, then please check with a Land Use Technician or our POD. He/She can assist you in determining whom the drop-off should go to, . within Land Use Services Division.· MAIN FILE COPY King County Department of Devclop1nent and Envirmunental Services 900 Oakesd::1lc Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 August 30, 200 I Gregg Zimmerman, Manager Planning/Building/Public Works City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Proposed Rezone & Preliminary Plat ofEvendell DDES File No. LOITY401/LOIP0016 Dear Mr. Zimmerman: The proposed plat ofEvendell is within one mile of the corporate limits of the City of Renton. Evendell is a proposal for 75 lots for single family detached dwellings on 13 acres and a rezone from R-4 to R-6, or, alternatively, 44 lots for single family detached dwellings on 11.4 acres without a rezoning classification. ·Enclosed is a copy of the proposed preliminary plat (both proposals) and environmental checklist for your review and comment. Please provide written comments, if any, by September 20, 200 I. If you have any questions, or would like additional information, please call me at (206) 296-7114 or e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov. Thank you for your cooperation. Karen Scharer, Planner II Current Planning Section, LUSD cc: Howard Stansbury, US Development Associates Pete Dye, P .E., Interim Supervising Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Trishah Bull, Planner II, Current Planning Section, LUSD MAIN FILE COPY ® I King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055~1219 TO: FM: RE: Proposed Plat of I School District, . LUSD File No: LD! Pool (o "l)) (['/4()1 ~ ,, . I ' ; .J The Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has received an application for a subdivision in your District. Enclosed is a copy of the (,e,isca) plat map received by the Land Use Services Division on .jt)l~ JZ(2.Qof In order for us to adequately evaluate this proposal, provide the most accurate information to the public, and for LUSD to serve the School District better, please provide us with the following information: Which schools do you anticipate the students living in this subdivision would attend? Elementary &1t1.r lllJOOd Jr. High/~::: . !YJ /1-V W {) 0 d ~ I Sr. High . Lt bete-Jl:j= Will the students walk or b~to these schools? Elementary . ka« S:5:<f Jr. High/Middle. ___ __.b"'-"'t.{~5~fL-=r:t1==>!-------------------- Sr. High. _______ _.,_b..,,uc.;$z.£"-4_.L_ ______________ _ If the students will be bussed, where do you anticipate the bus stops will be located? If that information is not available at this time, currently, where are the closest bus stops located to this site? · Jt- Elementary /~ () /lye 5 E 't >'= / 3, , / ~p //'Ve Se'" 91' ? Jr. High/Middle /?t) /lt;-e Se ,._ Zc /3'-</-1-.. S'r- SI' Sl"-- SE/ 3.S Sr. High. ___ -'-/-'r,C....C..()-'-',fvJ'-"--_;;_S_E __ Y: __ s_· _£_---'-/..::;3_, __ s-i,_r ___ _ Other Comments : _..::5-/-,,,..-:....:..:;_· l..'-"~~.;:..:-/-_S' _ ___,· W"-"<-.,_, ._/ {.__ _ _,,L,""f_,A-=i..( .>..:( <.=-__,,,hl:<-="-'--· -'P'-=---- I J?!< s w,lf ru+ tj _, I/ t { 0 ,.a n-i.a.d Please complete this form and return it by Avg. \.=:, ,20.QL to the address below. If you have questions regarding this proposal, please call l;'.Llte() _______ at (206) 296-'7/lf Thank you very much. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN: KZl'C1J o:ha ld, , Planner 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Form96/SPRS/ReqSchol.Inf clc 1/6/2000 MAIN FILE COPY ' King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 DATE: ~O\'l \ H l,C()\ TO: ~U@ School District, ATTN: _________ _ FM: ~)(,{) :xllirC<' RE: Proposed Plat of __,ev~_:&")____.::d=e\,:::,I'------------- • LUSD File No: lO!f?O()/(o '>/_£)(['{..:Jo/~ The Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has received an application for a subdivision in your District. Enclosed is a copy of the (re,ised) plat map received by the Land Use Services Division on <JUI~ )211-Qo/ In order for us to adequately evaluate this proposal, provide the most accurate information to the public, and for LUSD to serve the School District better, please provide us with the following information: Which schools do you anticipate the students living in this subdivision would attend? Sr. High_---'----------------------~-'------ Will the students walk or be bussed to these schools? Elementary~------------------------------~ Jr. High/Middle _________________________ _ Sr. High~-------------------------------~ If the students will be bussed, where do you anticipate the bus stops will be located? If that information is not available at this time, currently, where are the closest bus stops located to this site? Elementary~------------------------------~ Jr. High/Middle ________ ---'----------------- Sr. High--------------------------------~ Other Comments,~-------------------------------- Please complete this form and return it by Avg. \~ ,20.Q!__ to the address below. If you have questions regarding this proposal, please call ~IC() _______ at (206) 296-'7/11' Thank you very much. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN' Ktl'C:O ~ KL , Planner 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Form96/SPRS/ReqSchol.Inf clc l/6/2000 MAIN FILE COPY ' King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 TO: ~ School District, ATTN: __________ _ FM: RE: Proposed Plat of evecoell LUSD File No: LOI PCQJ(o ~ I 01Tf40{ (.~ The Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has received an application for a subdivision in your District. Enclosed is a copy of the (Fe,isea) plat map received by the Land Use Services Division on ..;i0h/ lo 1 Z{X)I In order for us to adequately evaluate this proposal, provide the most accurate information to the public, and for LUSD to serve the School District better, please provide us with the following information: Which schools do you anticipate the students living in this subdivision would attend? Elementary-------------------------------- Jr. High/Middle ___________________________ _ Sr. High---------------------------'------- Will the students walk or be bussed to these schools? Elementary~------------------------------~ Sr. High.~-------------------------------~ If the students will be bussed, where do you anticipate the bus stops will be located? If that information is not available at this time, currently, where are the closest bus stops located to this site? Elementary-------------------------------~ Jr. High/Middle _________ -'-------------------- Sr. High------------------------------- Other Comments: _______________________________ ~ Please complete this form and return it by ~-/..3 ,20..(2L_ to the address below. If you have questions regarding this proposal, please call ~retJ _______ at (206) 296-"']ll4 Thank you very much. King Couhty Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division , Planner 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Form96/SPRS/ReqSchol.Inf clc 1/6/2000 MAIN FILE COPVk-....1 . v-_'J King County Departnient of Development and Environ1nental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue S0u1hwcst Renton, WA 98055-1219 August 3, 2001 Howard Stansbury U.S. Land Development Associates C/0 Centurian Development Services 22617 81h Drive SE Bothell, WA 98021 .. ~·--· RE: Notice oflncomplete Application -File No. L01P0016 & L01TY401 Proposed Rezone & Subdivision of Evendell Dear Mr. Stm1sbury: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that on August 3, 2001 the Land Use Services Division determined that the above-referenced application is incomplete under the current requirements for a complete application as specified in King County Code 19A and 20. This initial determination is intended and used only for the purposes of determining the vesting date and for applying the time period established in the Code. The following information is needed for both applications to be considered complete: o Proof of Legal Lot Status: Submit documentation of the date and method of segregation of the subject property. o Engineer Stamp: Name, address, phone number, signature, and seal ofregistered engineer must be shown on the plat. 0 Owner Information: Name, address, and phone number of owner must be shown on the plat. o Numbering Lots: Number lots consecutively on the 44 lot proposal. o Small Site Plan: Provide a small site plan of the 44 lot proposal (with numbered lots). o Streets: Locate, name, m1d dimension all existing and proposed streets, and other publicways, casements, and deed restrictions within and adjacent to the proposed development. o Easements: Show m1y existing easements, per the title report, on the subject property. Land Use Services Division will keep your application "on hold" pending receipt of the above information. Pursuant to KCC 20.20.0SOE, if all of the requested information is not received by November I, 2001, your application will be canceled. No time extensions will be granted. Should the application be canceled, you will be required to submit a new application. @ Lf\N-Inc-A.ltr.doc 11/25/98 clc MAIN FILE COPY ------PageTwo ' •, If you have any questions concerning the above matter, I can be reached at 206-296-7114 or by e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov . Sincerely, J\W--h£Jv ~ ~ ~ ~ Karen Scharer, Planner II Current Planning Section, LUSD cc: Mike Romano, Centurion Development Services Kim ,Claussen, Planner III, Current Planning Section, LUSD Bruce Whittaker, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Trishah Bull, Planner II, Current Planning Section, LUSD Application file LF\N-Inc-A.ltr.doc 11/25/98 clc I PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EVENDELL Permit Approval Conditions Document Fire System Review Tracking Number: LOll?OOl 6 The following conditions apply to the Fire Engineering approval of the above referenced preliminary plat: SPECIAL CONDITION: The emergency vehicle access to 1601h Avenue SE shall have a minimum driving surface width of 20 feet, with an all-whether surface capable of supporting 25 tons. Any locking device shall be approved by the Renton Fire Department (KCFD #25). Chains, cable or bollards will not be permitted. The gate shall be located at least 50 feet from 1601 h A venue SE to allow space for fire apparatus to stop while opening the gate or to wait before entering the public roadway. If these conditions are not met any future residence constructed on lots 28, 29 and 30 will have to be sprinklered NFPA 13D. AA02 MUDD Any questions regarding the fire review of this plan should be directed to: Bill Mudd, Fire Engineer Telephone: (206) 296-6785. FHOl FIRE HYDRANT WATERMAIN PERMITS A separate permit is required for the installation of watermains and/or fire hydrants. Submit three (3) copies of drawings and specifications to DDES Building Services Division Permit Service Center for a permit application. Review and approval by Fire Engineering Section is required prior to installation. Plans shall include, but are not limited to; pipe sizes, pipe type, valves/fittings, thrust blocks and/or rodding and material listings. Fire hydrants shall be installed per K.C.C. Title 17 Watermains shall be installed and tested per A WW A standards and/or NFP A#24 (STANDARDS FOR PRIVATE FIRE HYDRANTS AND WA TERMAINS); as applicable. Ref. 1001.4 UFC NOTE: UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED, ANY WATERMAIN OR FIRE HYDRANT DETAILS ON BUILDING PLANS/DRAWINGS HA VE NOT BEEN REVIEWED OR APPROVED. FH74 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL Preliminary Fire Engineering approval has been granted based upon the following information provided. To obtain final Fire Engineering approval, the following item(s) must be submitted, reviewed and approved: I. Certificate of Water Availability. (Provided by appropriate water purveyor). Valid one year from date of signature. Minimum acceptance flow shall be 1000 gallons per minute at 20 pounds per square inch residual pressure. II. Three copies of plans indicating: A. Fire hydrant(s) location -measured by vehicular travel distance. (K.C.C. Title 17) Fire Systems Review Approval Conditions LOIPOOl6.doc Page I of2 Last saved by Exchange User February 18, 1999 MAIN FILE COPY ., . f I Residential I. 700 ft. maximum spacing. 2. Not more than 350 ft. from each lot. B. Watermain placement (K.C.C. Title 17) I. Source (i.e.) supply connection. 2. Main sizes identified. C. Fire access roads Ref. UFC 902.2 I. Minimum 20 ft. wide unobstructed-13'6" vertical clearance, unobstructed. All- weather surface, able to withstand 25 tons. 2. Fire access roads in excess of 150 feet (dead-ends), must have a tum-around area. Required turn-arounds must be a minimum 80-foot diameter. 3. Fire access roads must provide 20-foot minimum inside turning radius and 40 outside turning radius when said roads change direction. 4. Fire access roads shall not exceed 15% grade. 5. The required width of any fire apparatus access road shall not be obstructed in any manner, including parking of vehicles. Minimum required widths and clearances established under this section shall be maintained at all times. D.Marking when required, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads and prohibit the obstruction thereof or both. Ref. UFC 902.2 FH77 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL Final plat approval requires an inspection and approval of the fire hydrant and watermain installation by a King County Fire Inspector, prior to recording. Call (206)296-6675; after a permit to install has been obtained from DOES; Fire Protection Engineering. Fire Systems Review Approval Conditions LOIP0016.doc Page 2 of2 Last saved by Exchange User February 18, 1999 ·o··. 1 • KlngCounty ' • Department of Develop1nen and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue f • D • t • t R • t Renton, WA 98055-1219 ire IS r1c ece1 p Fire District #_,:::~:..:S'"'------- Name of Project/ Proposal __ ,:::£'i,::....:..,ve:,,.;=,,O'-"E.....,,,L.cL=------------------------ Location of Project/ Proposal ~iN'h. ,f 6£ 1:r, 'C's:r 86'Tl,wW IS''.t-""'i' St: ti-/(.b.tt,4v°". se. (Address, parcel number, tax account number, legal description)' *One of these required for processing of application ~.eess -n,-;: ;r-.J.~ /JCol;, is,0 /Jvt:"~£ (/'IZ.So<;-fozz) sf /~ SEC _____ _ 2.3 TWN ______ _ ANG. ----="->~'------ Name of Applicant (} • .S. LANI) 0E.v£LOf"µtNT A"ot/An:;,:< do .&&'JT't.lTt/D,-4 t:U:11£tiJ/'M£NT seev,-a:.-s KROLLPAGE __ t:J_I_I __ _ Address of Applicant Z z "17 -8 ° /ht. ,S €, • 1k -nll!J..L ,, M9: 9 fa z. I Telephone Number &zr-) i.ff{, -UW Description: Type of Project I Proposal Check appropriate box(es) D Apartment / Multifamily D Commercial / Industrial DRetail D Residential: Single Family Residence ODuplex ro Subdivision D Short Subdivision / Short Plat ®Rezone D Conditional Use D Unconditional Use D Planned Unit Development D School / Classroom DOther (describe)------------------------------- D Storz couplings required on Fire Hydrants Issuance of this receipt does not imply an approval, disapproval nor review of referenced project/ proposal. This re~~J~ shall be valid for 30 days from date of signature. Q , -!~ ~ 'Af:±11 if JS ~(),,!,}~Sc c_ ZJ"dy~ ~ ~ . ,,!S~i ~n ""1.ory.,.:iN~am~==-.:(_:::::· :____::_O..::f.R;,...-~J:C.:,1~-0~- Title Date Distribution: White: Applicant (see below) Yellow: King County Building Services Division Pink: Fire District Note Applicant: at the time of application to ODES the white copy must be presented with project I proposal submittal. 0178 (Rev. 9197) Fire District: mail yellow copy to: King County Building Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Renton, WA 98055-1219 Attn: Fire Engineering 22617-8"' Dr. SE Bothell. WA 98021 Joyce Kentfield King County ODES Land Use Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW. Renton, WA 98055 ~ CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 6, 2001 RE: Evendell Rezone and Plat Submittal ODES File #'s L01 P0016 and L01TY401 Dear Joyce: (425) 486-2563 OFF (425)486-3273 FAX Enclosed please find the assessors' maps required for the referenced submittal along with 8 copies of an explanatory submittal letter that is a supplement to the submittal package. Please call me at (425) 486-2563 if you have any questions. Thank you for your patience and timely response to my submittal request. Sincerely, Michael J. Romano Project Consultant Enclosures MAIN FILE COPY ~ "let us take the load."' LD IP6tM~