Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRezone File No 406-67 School Ap a r t - me n t s Convalescent Highland ~~, STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP! DOCUMENTS UNDER THIS NOTICE HAVE BEEN MICROFILMED. DO WOT REMOVE NOTICE FROM FILE. NEW FILING SHOULD BE ADDED ON TOP OF NOTICE. PAGES REMOVED UNDER THE NOTICE FOR COPYING MUST BE RETURNED TO THE SAME PLACE UNDER THE NOTICE. 1QP! STOP STOP STOP STOP yim os et ust 4, 1967 The Honorable Donald w. Custer, Mayor ‘Members of the City Council ee City Hall». ; Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Mathieson, Florence B., Appl. No. R-406-67, rezone from R-1 to R-3 (AMENDED TO R-2); property located in the vicinity of the NE corner of Sunset Blvd. Nn; and 116th Ave, S.B. Gentlenen and Mrs. Dahlquist: The Planning Commission at its public hearing meeting of July 26, 1967, reviewed the rezone application of Mrs. Florence B. Mathieson a5 requested by the City Council, The Planning Commission members felt that the R-2 zoning Classification would be more feasible than R-3 zoning for the property in question due primarily to the access prob- lem. The applicant indicated her willingness to amend her application to R-2. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommended to the City Council the approval of the amended application for R-2 toning. The proposed use is in agreement with the Comprehensive Plan, Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director ASSOCIATI N of WASHIN ‘TON CITiens 3935 UNIVERSITY WAY N.E. TO MAYORS,COUNCILMEN, COMMISSTONERS AND MANAGERS SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98105 TELEPHONE 543-0182 Yl Attention also of City Clerks: and ye ee Budget Officers Binge budget making time SS eg this is to remind all member cities that the annual service fee of the Association was revised by action of the last statewide convention held in Seattle,June 23. The action culminated extended study by a special committee to outline future Association goals and objectives - in turn it became a recommend- ation of the resolutions committee of the state convention, and finally by floor action at the annual business meeting the schedule was adopted unanimously. The new dues schedule will be as follows: Municipalities having a service Fee population of Base Per Capita 2,°CO ond under $15. plus .O71 2,001 to 5,000 $20. " .087 5,001 to 12,000 $50. ai 093 12,001 to 20,000 $100." .098 20,001 to 50,000 $250. " ~100 50,001 to 100,000 $500, " 097 100,001 to 200,000 g2,500, * 043 200,001 and over $3,500 " «032 The adjustment has been made necessary by higher costs and to supplement _ the Association's service program. In commenting on the revision, President R.H. "Bob" Lewis made the following observation: "In view of the outstanding suecess of the Association's 1967 Legislative program, the direct result of which will bring some $22 million of new revenues to cities and towns during the current biennium, together with many other measures of the greatest significance to local governments, in addition to its regular research and service program, I am certain that the amount spent for Association activities is the best investment our city makes. Likewise I am confident the municipal officials of all other member cities join me in this feeling and recognize that it would have been impossible for cities to obtain these highly important results without working cooperatively and unitedly through our Association." Budget officers and those concerned with the presentation of the budget are urged to recompute their dues on the basis of the above schedule, based on the most recent census board data, so that the new dues schedule will be considered when the budget is being formulated and presented to the City Council. The regular annual Budget Suggestions bulletin which will also contain the new dues schedule, plus a summary of many new statutes having fiscal impact, has been completed and should be in the hands of each member city in the immediate future, bincepely your, f Ca a ee ae ae oe Chester Biesen Member: NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES «=. Cw wee BXECUT IVE, DIRECTOR ftictol Publication: WESTERN CITY OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK + RENTON, WASHINGTON CITY HALL, CEDAR RIVER PARK, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ¢ ALPINE 5-3464 a “ > capitat © August 24, 1967 Mr, Bruce Mahler, Land & Tax Agent King County Assessor's Office County Court House, Room 201 Seattle, Washington 98104 Dear Sir: Enclosed is a certified copy of Ordinance No, 235%, 2355 & 2356 changing the zoning of certain properties within she City of Renton, as passed and approved on this ie day of August, 1967 ° Very truly yours, CITY OF RENTON Ht Le cie WA f, Lote pe? Helmie W. Nelson City Clerk HWN/h Enclosure (1) cort gyobb) ORDINANCE NO, 2756 AN ORDIN..NCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CH .NGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN FROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM SINGLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-1) TO RESIDENTI.L DISTRICT (R-2) WHEREAS under Chapter VII, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the ‘Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton‘, as amended, and the maps adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Single Residence District (R-1); and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the City Clerk on or about June 7, 1967, which petition was then duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study cand public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about June 28, 1967, which hearing was duly continued, and proper notice of such hearing has been duly published and posted as provided by law; and petitioner-owner haying duly amended his petition in writing; and said petition, as amended, having been duly considered by the Planning Commission and said rezoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition chereto, NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE M:YOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residential District (R-2); the City Engineer and the Planning Director are hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, as follows: West half of Southwest yguarter of Nurthwest \uarter of Northwest quarter lying northeasterly of Sunset Highway less portion northerly of line running south 60°35'05" West from point 121.20 feet south of Northeast corner thereof, S2ction 9, Township 23 N., Range 5 E., W.M., records of King County, Washington (property situated in vicinity Northeast corner betwean Sunset Blvd. N. and 116th ..venue S. £.) SECTION II: This O:dinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and legal publication. a/ - P.SSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this Feth day of syap, 2/< , APPROVED BY THE M.YOR this t4th day of Augustt, P ff j , ay La , / appr ep as, to : y € ALLA f if ty _ wee 8 Donald W. Custer, Mayor Joba K. Phin, Jv. asst. City .ttorney Date of Publication aijg 2 4 196/ August 4, 1967 The Honorable Donald W. Custer, Mayor _ Members of the City Council “City Hall Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Mathieson, Florence B., Appl. No. R-40667, rezone from R-1 to R-3 (AMENDED. TO R-2); property located in the vicinity of the NE corner of Sunset Blvd. N. and 116th Ave. S.E. Gentlemen and Mrs. Dahlquist: The Planning Commission at its public hearing meeting of . July 26, 1967, reviewed the rezone application of Mrs. Florence B. Mathieson as requested by the City Council. The Planning Commission members felt that the R-2 zoning classification would be more feasible than R-3 zoning for the property in question due primarily to the access prob- lem. The applicant indicated her willingness to amend her application to R-2. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommended to the City Council the approval of the amended application for R-2 zoning. The proposed use is in agreement with the Comprehensive Plan. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director > @) Bi | July 11, 1967 ees ee Mrs. Florence Mathieson P. 0. Box 2025 Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Appeal of Planning Commission Decision in Denial of Rezone Dear Mrs. Mathieson: ‘The Renton City Council, at its regular meeting of July 10th, has set the date of August 7th for hearing on your appeal. Since you have expressed your interest in amending your application the matter has been referred to the Planning Commission for reconsideration of your additional requests. It is our suggestion that you be present at the Planning Commission meeting to discuss the contemplated revisions and you are invited to be present at the City Council Hearing on August 7th at which time the Commission will make its recommendations regarding your revised application, upon which the Council will make a determination. The Council hearing will be held in the Council Chamberg,..Renton City Hall, at 8:00 P.M. 3 Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Helmie W. Nelson City Clerk HWN /din Pte wes . INTER-OFFICE MEMO DATE: &/{ ee “7 7 SE TO: Helmie Nelson, City Clerk FROM: Jack Wilson, City Engineer RE: a I hereby certify that the legal description contained in the attached ee eon on the KA ATH ILE Seon property is correct. Cebeeee a ae a Jack Wilson, City Engineer fig? Gilewrec om Minutes - Renton City Council Meeting 8-7-67 PUBLIC HEARING: Emmett J. Donckers appeal of Planning Commission decision in rezone denial, from GS-1 to R-2, property located at NE corner of South 11th Street and Morris Avenue South. This being the date set, the hearing was declared open. Communication from Planning Director Ericksen outlined features studied by the Planning Commission in its review of the matter with outlook to the future development that might be expected in the area, now predominantly single family residential with homes valued from $10,000.00 to $45,000.00. Concern was expressed regarding additional vehicular traffic and access, and although R-2 exists in the block to the west, extension of the R-2 was not considered desirable, it being noted that additional inquiries have been made with reference to existing vacant tracts of land in the area. Other rezone requests are anticipated if this one were granted. The R-2 zoning has existed since 1957 with no multiple construction being effected and the Commission felt that the future development of the area should be single family residential so indicating on the Comprehensive Plan presently under revision. Audience comment was invited and Mr. Donckers, 606-11th Avenue South, advised that the property now complies with Ordinances and the Comprehensive Plan and it would be just if the Council would grant the requested rezone. Mrs. Donckers added that they do have ingress and egress provisions and the area would be enhanced by the updated construction. Further comment was invited and Mr. Tony Mola, 516-11th Avenue South, read his letter of protest to the rezone as presented to the Planning Commission which stated that the proposed duplex would be detrimental to his property valuation and to that of other residences in the area. It was noted that the block in which Mr. Mola resides is zoned R-2 and no request has been filed for R-1 zoning. Inquiry followed regarding the lot size and a sketch was shown of the 12,000 sq. ft. lot with duplex unit and existing residence. It was noted that the Commission had voted unanimously ‘for denial of the rezone feeling that 4 or 5 years hence would be a more appropriate timing. Mrs. Donckers inquired as to basis for determination that multiple use is premature or right for the area citing the need for hausing for school teachers and others at the present time, deeming it discriminatory that one block is R-2 and the other restricted. Discussion ensued regarding zonings in other areas of the City and the justification of the findings of the Planning Commission in its review of best interest of a whole area rather than a single lot or block. Moved by Hulse, seconded by Morris, that the hearing be closed. Carried. Moved by Perry, seconded by Garrett, to concur in the R-2 rezone request. Hulse noted that it would seem to him to stretch a point to get a multiple unit on the lot along with the present residence and he would uphold the Planning Commission decision. Schellert noted that the Ordinance would need to state compliance of the rezone to the Comprehensive Plan and it was pointed out that the rezone to the zoning of that property across the street was before the Council at this time and not its use. Question was called for on the pending motion to grant the rezone and verbal ayes being in majority, the motion carried. Moved by Garrett, seconded by Perry, to refer the matter to the Law and Ordinance Committee for proper Ordinance. Carried. a PUBLIC HEARING: Florence B. Mathieson rezone request from R-1 to R-3 amended to R-2 on property located in vicinity of the NE corner of Sunset Blvd. North and 116th Avenue S.E. This being the date set, the hearing was declared open. Letter from Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director, reported review of the revised rezone request by the Commission which felt that the R-2 would be more feasible than R-3 primarily due to the access problem, approval of which was now recommended to the City Council. The proposed use is in agreement with the Comprehensive Plan. Dahlquist inquired as to why the R-3 originally requested was not granted when the property is surrounded by the nursing home and 40 unit apartments. Planning Director Ericksen pointed out that the access problem was the main reason Sunset being the only one and with widening of Sunset an even greater problem might result. Applicant had indicated her intent to keep within low density use and the R-2 would therefore suffice. Moved by Poli, seconded by Hulse, that the hearing be closed. Carried. Moved by Poli, seconded by Trimm, to concur in the Planning Commission recommendation for R-2 zoning with referral to the Law and Ordinance Committee for proper Ordinance. Carried. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed Ordinance providing procedure for the vacation of streets and alleys; imposing processing fee and authorizing compensation to the City. This being the date set, the hearing was declared open. There were no written communica- tions nor verbal comment and it was moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Schellert, that the hearing be closed. Carried. Moved by Schellert, seconded by Delaurenti, to refer the proposed Ordinance to the Law and Ordinance Committee. Carried. = oe at tae Cte * \e% 4 August 4, 1967 The Honorable Donald W. Custer, Mayor Members of the City Council pe City Mall on Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Mathieson, Florence 8., Appl. No. R.406-67 rezone from R-1 to R-3 {AMENDED TO R-2); property located in the vicinity of the NE corner of Sunset Bivd. NM. and 116th Ave, S.8. Gentlemen and Mrs. Dahlquist: The Planning Commission et its public hearing meeting of July 26, 1967, reviewed the rezone application of Mrs. Florence &. Mathieson as requested by the City Council. The Planning Commission members felt that the &-2 toning classification would be wore feasible than R-3 soning for the property in question due primarily to the access prob- lem. The applicant indicated her willingness to amend her application to R-2, The Planning Commission, therefore, recoumended to the City Council the approval of the amended application for R-2 soning. The preposed use is in agreement with the Comprehensive Plan, Very truly yours, Gorden ¥. .Bricksen Plenning Diréctor : . ! - a | py oi Renton, Washington . tageel TE July 5, 1967 Noses City of Renton, Planning Department Cedar River Park, Renton, Wash. 98055 “de Czy / aT ATIN: City Clerk fi) ted & f ne nA foto Aenrmid, y ‘ 4 Reference is made to your letter of June 29, 1967 which states that my application, requesting rezone of my property, from R-1 to R-3, had been denied. I telephoned your office and talked with Mr. Moss regarding my application and requested the reason for denial. He informed me that the questions brought up at phe meeting were that of access and exit roads to and from the property. Since no one/present at the meeting to answer these questions, the application was denied, at this time. I wish to appeal your decision and submit as an Amendment to my application, the following: First of all, I was not aware that I had to attend the meeting, or have someone to represent me in my absence. Secondly, due to serious illness tin my family, I would not have been able to attend. Had I known such questions would arise, I could very well have had someone to stand in for me. Prior to this date and since I have submitted my application, I have discussed the problem of access and exit roads, both ways, to and from, with the manager of the Highland Convalescence Home, with various real estate brokers, and salesmen who are interested in buying property, such as mine. It was agreed, that access and exit roads to and from the property could be worked out, to serve both my property and the Highland Conv. Home, thus resulting in an improvement over the present plan. Because of the traffic becoming heavier entering the Highland Conv. Home, from the east on Sunset Boulevard, through my property, the dust from that road creates a problem at my house, whereby I am forced to keep all windows closed on the east side of my home and now even during the dry spell, I have to keep all windows and doors closed to help keep the dust out. At this time redesign of the driveways are contemplated. It is respectfully requested that the commission reconsider my application at this time, taking into consideration, the redesigning of new driveways to benefit both properties, and approve the rezone to either the R-3 or amendment to an R-2 rezone. If at all possible, I shall try to attend the next meeting, or be present when my case is being considered. My telephone at work between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. is 773-3453 and I would appreciate a phone call from your office as to the date and time -set for meeting in regard to above application. FD O*N a Dol con Mrs -)Florence Mathieson 1 F I L. e D P. O. Box 2025, Renton, Wash. 98055 i | A /f (io ae CITY CLERK OIL. Ler geet —y 4 -—Z1 ez ; C Fy s VY, eaten CK mn yt A July 20, 1967 Mrs. Florence B. Mathieson P. 0, Box 2025 : BEARD? Washington. 98055 Re: Rezone Application No. R-406-67 Rezone. from R-1 to R-3 PROPOEEY. located at 2502 Sunset Blvd. N. Dear Mrs. Mathieson: This is to inform you that the Planning Commission will reconsider your zoning application at its public hearing meeting of July 26, 1967, in the Council Srimahays City Hall, starting at 8:00 P. M. - Your presence at this meeting is requested in order to clarify questions that have arisen and to, discuss be application wath the Commission. ; Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director “f ce: ‘City Clerk INTER-OFFICE MEMO To: Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director and July 11, 1967 Renton Planning Commission Date_ July ll, From: _Helmie Nelson, City Clerk The Renton City Council, at its regular meeting of July 10th has received appeal from Mis. Mathieson regarding denial of rezone request on property at Sunset Blvd. North and 116th Ave. S.E. and since she has expressed willingness to amend her application the matter has’beerreferred to the Planning Commission for further recommendation. August 7th has been set for hearing on the matter in order that the Commission might have an opportunity to reconsider the revised request. Helmie June 29, 1967, Heb te Mrs. Florence B. Mathieson 2502 Sunset Blvd. N. Renton, Washington 98055 Re;:.. Mathieson, Florence B., Appl. No. R-406-67, rezone from Rel to R-3; property located in the vicinity of the NE corner of Sunset Blyd. N. and 116th Ave. S.E. Dear Mrs. Mathieson: The Planning Commission, upon teview of your rezone ap- plication, voted to deny the zoning requested. Appeal of this denial may be made to the Renton City Council ©. within ten days of the Planning Commission public hear- ing. Appeal should be filed in writing with the City | Clerk at the sts Ticastalon Should you have any questions regarding this matter, Eine ee contact us. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen is Pe Planning Director ‘A cc} “city Clerk APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE IN THE CITY OF RENTON FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No.: fe. Usb-b 7 Sec.-Twp.-R. Date of Filing: ee Area Map Plani.Com. Action: VNenres Kroll Page Date: G2 et Receipt No. 5233 City Council Action: Date: Ord. APPLICANT TO ANSWER ALL THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS NEATLY AND ACCURATELY : 2502 Sunset Blvd. Name of Applicant Florence B. Mathieson Address P. 0. Box 2025 Telephone No. AL5-5901_ ~- (Office: 773-3453) i nton, Wash. wy iy NE corner Property Petitioned an rezoning is situated on ‘ Sada? , between "qimaybyenre® © ek ae and \\\e th Ave, 4.6. Sisieeet . Legal Description of Subject Property CODE SEC-TWP-RG 09-23-05 9058 OT51 09-23-05 Ww 1/2 OF Sw 1/4 OF Nw 1/4 OF Nw 1/4 LY NELY OF SUNSET HWY LESS PORT NLY OF IN RNNG S 60-35-05 W FR PP 121.20 FT S OF NE COR THOF NC NV em DEP! eee Poniae R-1(residential) Zoning Requested R-3 What are the uses you propose to develop on this property? Multiple dwellings Number of permanent off-street parking spaces that will be provided on this property? One for each unit Number required One for each unit NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information you desire to submit to substantiate your request may be attached to these sheets. 1. In what way is this proposed change in zoning in the public interest? provid iS LHe 5 c ! S more s able Po mt ? dwellings or _an. apartment house . ‘Approx. 0 sq. ft. available, or about an acre. 2. On what basis is there a real need in this community for more zoning of the type you request? ~ DO you consider the property invoived in this spol eaten to be more suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone than for the uses permitted in the present classification: Please explain. yes, There is approximately one &ecre in this piece of property that could be developed. What provision would you make to protect adjacent and surrounding prop- erty from the detrimental effects of any uses permitted in the proposed zone: All necessary provisions will be made. we RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION Ds HEARING MEETING JULY 26, 1967 oa MINUTES COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert Brower, James Denzer, Dayle Garrison, John Racanello, John Sterling, Stan Stone, Richard Stredicke, Clark Tee- garden CITY STAFF PRESENT: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director; James L. Mag- stadt, Assistant Planning Director; Lyman Houk, Engineering Department; Harriet Hilder, Recording Secretary The Public Hearing Meeting of the Renton Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Garrison at 8:00 P.M, 1. 2% ROLL CALL was taken by Secretary Denzer. All members responded present. The Chairman stated that prior to opening the meeting for business a moment of silence would be observed in respect to Planning Commissioner Gerald Cordell who had passed away a few days previously. BUSINESS REFERRED BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION FROM CITY COUNCIL: REZONE APPLICATION r (a) MATHIESON, FLORENCE B., APPL. NO. R-406-67, REZONE FROM R-1 in ee l sa s s TO R-3; PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE NE CORNER OF SUNSET BLVD. -N; AND LI6TH AVE. S.E, The Chairman, described the rezone application. The Planning Director pointed out the location of the property on the zoning map and indica- ted the rezone request had been heard before the Planning Commission on June 28, 1967, and after review had been denied. The applicant appealed this decision to the City Council and in her letter of appeal indicated she might be willing to accept an R-2 zoning classification. The mat- ter was then referred back to the Planning Commission for reconsidera- tion prior to the Council meeting of August 7, 1967. Following discussion of the access problem from heavily traveled Sun- set Blvd., Mrs. Mathieson, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the re- zone application. Discussion foltowed regarding the number of units that could be constructed on the property under R-2 zoning as it pre- sently reads and under the proposed R-2 amended zoning now under con- sideration. Stone asked Mrs. Mathieson if she would be willing to accept R-2 zoning rather than R-3. Mrs. Mathieson replied that she would accept R-2.zoning. It was maved by Stone, seconded by Denzer, that Mrs. Mathieson's rezone application amended to R-2 from R-3 be accepted by the Planning Commission. The motion carried unanimously. Further discussion followed concerning access and the number of duplex units that could be built on the. property. Stredicke moved the hearing be closed; Denzer seconded. Motion carried unanimously. ACTION: Moved by Stredicke, seconded by Stone, that the rezone application of Florence B. Mathieson as amended from R-3 to R-2 be approved and for- warded to the Council as it agrees with the Comprehensive Plan. Roll call vote was requested; members voting as folows: Brower - no Sterling - no Denzer - aye Stone - aye Racanello - aye Stredicke - aye Teegarden - abstained Motion carried. So goer eM TRG ENE, dune 7, 1967 The following information is furnished with regard to my application, requesting re-zoning of my property from R-1 to R-3, located at 2502 Sunset Blvd. E., Renton, Washington. Due to the fact that all other property surrounding my land has elready been re-zoned to R-3, it is believed that my property should be re-zoned to R-3 for development purposes. At this time, I have made no decision as to type of buildings as epartment rental unite I wish to build, except that should the demand arise for additional houseing, or if by chance, decide to sell, the property will be eveilable for development purposes. There are no plans drawn up for units, but the amount of lend or space available, there will be ample off-the-street parking for as many units requested for in the permit. It is further stated that the location of this property is very desirable for building rental wits. It is located where water, electricity, gas lines and sewer are readily aba available. AFFIDAVIT I, FPlorence B. Mathieson being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property invoived in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this be day ofc , 1967 , \ Notary Public in and for . of Washington, residing at E w , AY Zs, DV ~* wre - LA kh) TDlererew bd Wa Thineon (Signature of Owner) = Hf (nO a P. 0. Box 2025 res ee (Mailing Address) . PF dy, a Spare Renton, Washington 98055 _ oS yorany® ’ (city) (State) aS ee ie AN PUBLICS. é AL 5-5901 and/or 773-3453 Pel. BB ee (Telephone) (OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to sand regulations of the Renton Planning Department gover of such application. Date received \\ 19 BY: \j ia Renton Planning Dept. Rev. March 1967 Renton Planning Commission Meeting June 28, 1967 Minutes Page 6 The Chairman described the rezone application, The Planning Director pointed out the location of the property on the zoning map and indica- ted it had been considered previously by the Planning Commission for R-3 zoning and denied. He stated further that under R-2 zoning, any apartment units proposed would have to be by special permit and brought before the Planning Commission for approval, Slides of the property were shown. Comments were invited from the audience, There were none. It was moved by Denzer, seconded by Brower, that the hearing be closed. Motion carried unanimously. ACTION: It was moved by Denzer, seconded by Brower, that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval for R-2 zoning as it agrees with the Comprehensive Plan. Motion carried unanimously. (f) ROCCHIO (ROCKEY), LOUISE, APPL. NO. R-405-67, REZONE FROM R-2 TO B-1; PROPERTY LOCATED VICINITY OF NE CORNER OF S. 2ND ST. AND LOGAN AVE. S. The Chairman described the rezone application and called for comments from the Commissioners and the audience. There were none. It was moved by Stone, seconded by Brower, that the hearing be closed. Motion carried unanimously. ACTION: It was moved by Denzer, seconded by Brower, that the Planning Commis- sion recommend to the City Council that the rezone request be granted as it is in agreement with the Comprehensive Plan. Motion carried unanimously. (g) MATHIESON, FLORENCE B., APPL. NO. R-406-67, REZONE FROM R-1 TO R-3; PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE NE CORNER OF SUNSET BLVD. N. AND 116TH AVE. S.E. The Chairman described the application, and the Planning Director pointed out the location of the property on the zoning map. He indica- ted that the area was basically of a multiple residential natuge with business zoning to the west, a nursing home to the north and public housing to the east. The Chairman read a letter from the Traffic Engineer which stated that the present access (Sunset Blivd. N.) was not sufficient to serve a high density improvement. The letter stated further that sufficient access with proper improvements could be developed to serve adequately the above-mentioned property but it might require restricting con- flicting movements at its intersection with Sunset Highway. The letter stated that no ctncrete plans have been developed for the widening of Sunset Highway in this vicinity, but that it will be essential within the next couple of years. Slides of the property in question were shown. There was discussion among the Commissioners regarding the heavy density of traffic along Sunset Blvd. N. and the difficulty of access to Sunset Highway from the applicant's property. Comments were invited from the audience; there were none. It was moved by Brower, seconded by Denzer, that the hearing be closed. Motion carried unanimously. Brower. stated that he believed the property is quite suitable for R-3 zoning, but he did not like the access to the property as it exists at this time. He stated further that this area is one of the worst Renton Planning Commission Meeting June 28, 1967 Minutes Page 7 for access in the City of Renton and that he felt that R-2 zoning would be the best suitable use for the property at this time. Stred- icke pointed out that R-2 zoning would present as many problems as regards access to the property as R-3. ACTION: It was moved by Stredicke, seconded by Brower, that the application be denied as it is premature. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stone suggested the Planning Department be instructed to notify the applicant by letter of the action of the Planning Commission as well as her right of appeal. (h) DELLOSO, DOMINICK, APPL. NO. R-407-67, REZONE FROM R-1 TO R-4; PROPERTY LOCATED ON 5TH AVE. W. BETWEEN EARLINGTON AND THOMAS STS. The Chairman described the rezone.application. The Planning Director pointed out the location of the property on the zoning map. He stated that the property is behind some existing single family residences and that the area, with the exception of one apartment unit, is predominate- ly single family residential. He stated further that the area does have some development problems in terms of topography of the area. Slides of the property were shown. Comments from the audience were invited. Mr. Delloso, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the. rezone. He stated that 40 feet of access from 5th Ave. W. to the major portion of the property was available. Mr. Harvey J. Nelson, an associate of Mr. Delloso, spoke on behalf of the rezone.: He outlined his plans’ for an apartment. .unit.that:.would upgrade the area. Mr. Charles Taylor of 412 Thomas Street stated that he was very much interested in seeing the area upgraded and was concerned that Mr. Del- loso make the best possible use of the property if the rezoning were granted. Some discussion then ensued regarding the possibility of R-2 zoning for the property which would allow apartments under special permit and would give the Planning Commission some control over the develop- ment of the property. The Planning Director stated the Commission had indicated its intention to hold the area to low density multiple use and that the recommendation concerning the Butko property close by was based on this. Stredicke asked the applicant if he would accept R-2 zoning. Mr. Del- loso replied that he would accept R-2 zoning on the whole property in question. Stredicke moved the hearing be closed, seconded by Stone. Motion carried unanimously. ACTION: It was moved by Stredicke, seconded by Stone, that the Planning Com- mission recommend granting of R-2 zoning (amended by the applicant from R-4) on the subject property as it agrees with the Comprehensive Plan and forward said recommendation to the City Council for approval. Motion carried unanimously. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS (a) ELECTION OF OFFICERS. The Chairman opened the meeting for June 29, 1967 Mrs. Florence 8, Mathieson 2502 Sunset Blvd, N. Renton, Washington 98055 Re; Mathieson, Florence B., Appl. No. R-406-67, rezone from Rel to R-3; property located in the vicinity of the NE corner of Sunset Blvd. N. and 116th Ave. S.E. Dear Mrs, Mathieson: The Planning Commission, upon review of your rezone ap- plication, voted to deny the zoning requested, Appeal of this denial may be made to the Renton City Council within ten days of the Planning Commission public hear- ing. Appeal should be filed in writing with the City Clerk at the City Hall. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact us, Very truly yours, Gordon. Y. Ericksen — Planning Director ©. ce: City Clerk — 346 4 “4 S 4? © CO SO0>8 72 omeaprric exGIN . Par eA ; PRABERIC ENGINEERING DIVISION © RENTON,WASHINGTON e b (=) = mall y = CiTY HALL,RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 @ ALPINE 5- eS, = % & ae 2) Op, oe ” CAPITA June 28, 1967 Mr. Dayle Garrison, Chairman Members of the Renton Planning Commission Re: FLORENCE B. MATHESON, Application No. R-406-97 Gentlemen: As requested by the Planning Commission, I have reviewed, the MATHESON property located in the vicinity of the northeast corner of Sunset Boulevard North and 116th Avenue S.E. The present access is not sufficient to serve a high density improvement. It seems likely, however, a sufficient access with proper im- provements could be developed to adequately serve the abovementioned property. It might require restricting conflicting movements at its intersection with the Sunset Highway. No concrete plans have been developed for the widening of the Sunset Highway from 116th Avenue S.E. to the east city limits. With the opening of the North Renton Interchange and the easterly approach to the Sunset Highway at 116th Avenue S.E., the widening of the Sunset Highway to the east of 116th Avenue S.E. will be essential within the next couple of years. Until such time as more information is available from the State Highway Department regarding this project, I would be unable to de- termine what access control would be required. sincerely, i nee DEL BENNETT Traffic Enqineer DB:en MEMORANDUM TO: Traffic Engineer | DATE: June 27, 1967 PROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Item (g) Mathieson, Florence B., Appl. No... R-406-67, rezone from R-1 to R-3; property located in the vicinity of NE corner of Sunset Blvd. N. and 116th Ave. S.&. ‘(see copy of agenda attached) The Planning Commission has requested a report from the Traffic. Engineer regarding access to above-named property; possibility of future widening of Sunset Blvd.; and any general restrictions regarding access which might be in the offing. ec: Chairman, Planning Commission Renton Planning Commission Meeting June 14, 1967 Minutes Page 3 The Chairman described the rezone application, The Planning Director pointed out the location of the property on the zoning map and stated the existing Comprehensive Plan indicates multi-family residential but the Comprehensive Plan under study for revision cuts back this area to single family residential use. (d) NORTHERN PACI RAI LWA 0 APPL. NO. R=403=-67, REZONE FROM G TO H=1) PROPERTY LOCATED ON 72ND AVE. S. COR MONSTER ROAD), FORMERLY SANITARY LAND FILL SITE, LOCATED SOUTHEASTERLY OF METRO TREATMENT PLANT. The Chairman described the application and stated the area would be reviewed on the next field trip. (Ce) BUTKO, GEORGE Ci, APPL» NO. R=404~67, REZONE FRC | TO R=2; PROPERTY LOCATED SE CORNER OF EARLINGTON ST. AND 4TH AVE, W. The Chairman described the application and indicated the applicant had previously petitioned been denied, the Commission for R-«3 zoning which had Zz I. The Chairman described the rezone application and stated that this is the third let to be purchased by Washington Mutual Bank as a part of the site of their new structure. (8) The Chairman described the rezone application. The Planning Director stated that the property in question is adjacent the convalescent home in the Highlands area and pointed out the loca- tion of the property on the zoning map. Mr. Brower stated he felt the Commission should get a statement from the Engineering Depart~ ment regarding Sunset Blvd. inasmuch as this street is the only pxepnae to the property and is heavily traveled now. (h) 07=67, REZO R= 4 BE TWEE ad E FROM R=1 TO EARIINGTON ST. AND (@ ) Wa I Bw : l 3 oD The Chairman deseribed the rezone application. The Planning Director pointed out the lecation of the subject preperty on the zoning map. Stredicke stated that the original Butke appli- éation for R=3 was denied because it did not conform to the Com- prehensive Plan and yet this property is less than a block away from the Butke property. The Planning Director stated that the applicant was advised that while the Comprehensive Plan indicates multi-family residential use, rezoning to R-4 at this time would probably be questionable; but the area might be feasible for low density multiple residence use (R=2, apartments by special permit). The Planning Director stated that for 1985 and because a particular hensive Pian does not necessarily We are trying te projeet land use ¥ange plan the Commission has the of timing. the Comprehensive Plan is a plan use is indicated on the Compre- mean that use is feasible now, inte the future, and on a long right to interpret the question NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON WEDNESDAY. JUNE 28, 1967 , AT 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER WORECOCOON PORK THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: F ENTARATK PIMOORNE NING WEGAO WES ORDEMDONEX 1. REZONE FROM GS-1 TO R-2, property located on NE corner of intersection of S. lith St. and Morris Ave. S. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 14, 15, 16, Block 3, Renton View Addition, King County, Washington. 2. REZONE FROM G TO H-1, property located on 72nd Ave, S. (or Monster Road), formerly sanitary land fill site, located southeasterly of Metro Treatment Plant. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of Govern- ment Lots 5 and 6 of Sec. 24, Twp 23N, Range 4E, W.M., lying betwoen the centerline of the old channel of the Green (formerly White) River and the Main Lino right of way of Northern Pacific Railway Company; togethor with a private access road along the northeasterly 16' of said right of way extending about 180' northwesterly from the exist- ing "Monster Road" prade crossing of said right of way in Government Lot 8 of said section, township and range. 53. REZONE FROM R-1 TO R-2, property located S.E. corner of Earlington St, and 4th Ave. W. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Northeasterly 81' of Lots 11 through 14, Block 7, Barlington Addition, King County, Washington. 4. RHZONE FROM R-2 TO B-1, property located ficinity of NB corner of °S. 2nd St. and Logan Ave. S. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, Block 4, Motor Line Addition to Renton, records of King County, Washington. Mash iesen 5. REZONE FROM R-1 TO R-3, property located in the vicinity of the NE corner of Sunset Blvd. N. and 116th Ave. S.E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: W 1/2 of SW 1/4 of NW 1/4 of NW 1/4 lying northeasterly of Sunset Highway less portion northerly of line running south 60°35'05" W from point 121.20" south of NE corner thereof, Sec. 9, Twp 23, Range SE, W.M., records of King County, Washington. Rs 6. REZONE FROM R-1 TO R-4, property located on 5th Ave. W. between Earlington St. and Thomas St. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 20; northerly 146' of Lot 21 and westerly 1/2 of Lot 22; northerly 136' of easterly 1/2 Lot 22 and Lot 23; including southerly 118' of Lots 4 and 5, less south 20' of Lots 4 and 5 for street. All in Block 6, Plat of Harlington, King County, Washington. 7. SPBCIAL PERMIT, request to build apartment in R-2 zone, property located at 813 N. 3rd St. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 11, Replat of Block 22, Renton Farm Plat No. 5, according to plat recorded in Vol. 18 of Plats, Pago 75, in King County, Washington. ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON JUNE 28 , 1967 , AT 8:00 P.M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTEST OR OBJECt+ TION TO SAME. JAMES E. DENZER ,SECRETARY PUBLISHED June 15, 1967 RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION CRRTIFICATION Te LAN O8 DM Oe SRAM teu! Hereby cortity Thal three (3) coplea of the above document were posted by me in three Hana te vous aaa on tha prop- erty deseribed above as prescribed by law. .-" Z ATTEST: Subscribed and Sworn to owed rr X Leg before me, a notary public, on the 4 16th day of June, 1967. a vf Pe. / = (/ de f} ey er ae : ee © — ae i lhe he gE bak ra an ae a ae v7 Bs bes > Mie eis re ae 9 aR 4 a EE ee Otte sen! nea ayn arg, beeen) Say Ane te tenes winnie wet. ambien pede a ~ L9bI a ei 2 ta OY. Ss a s Spaoe ry O27] tees ks al ‘See 3 pe leIn La 3D cigs Pi i pe y Kite teed echo) SO ee Se oe ot Se tl Satya dr i a Rin Seine SHS | EE oe Pi : ‘ eae tir Se walt. fe CLASS A aig * 7 Saar, a Bit “OS OL hs peed OF LVIOCO FIND IN ed TINT R SHON G21 ER Rew ee 5) Be INN 16 bh A NY . RNS ee Ss SO OF CSLYUYCD FIAYCS "NK va Papen es Cod : : , ? + : nd ie © ADmAawrL SLNiod wis is kc hee wie: Peppa oe LY LBS SI HLS .&%.%, a ae sors ke 5h Ae we? ; as Wat Wy, dow ea; d300~ 32032 | eo ee ke Pee ' : GAMA OUMNLYOO} pee ee Mer ee ees Se oe erat BIWSS asa Ee, 6S . ag Fe UVLO a ee > i ae m vi i 4 . Bs Meg. > — pa r e \ or og > -t e a t p r s m e m m p e t i p s t i e n e s Se c e m t o g r i i n y AA W HL O qn ‘ . i vv" i V - a | ‘ 2 “Si = ! ; ~ ie a” j o ~~ of i oe . | ig Sd ¢? X+. r