Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Rezone File No 446-68
STOP STOP STOP- STOP STOP! DOCUMENTS UNDER THIS NOTICE HAVE BEEN MICROFILMED, DO NOT REMOVE NOTICE FROM FILE. NEW FILING SHOULD BE ADDED ON TOP OF NOTICE, PAGES REMOVED UNDER THE NOTICE FOR COPYING MUST BE RETURNED TO THE SAME PLACE UNDER THE NOTICE. _ Gewuarimarnemernemmasesssharm pam Se aaa RENTER SE S| OP! STOP STOP STOP- STOP , ign NOTICE OF PURLIC HEARING « a 4 a bo - RENTON CIEY COUNCIL SZ RENTON, WASHINGTON — Z “mS A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL AT TPS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, ON May 6, 1968. AT 8:00 P.M, TO CCNSTDER A PETITION, 22-05 amended for Rezone from GS-1 to R-2 on THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 3 and lh, Block 1, Shepard Heights Addition, according to the plat recorded in Vol. 46 of Plats, page 12 Records of King County, Washington. Also together - with that portion of the SW + of the SE x L of Sec. ly, TWP 23 N, Range 5 E, W.M., described as eld cig Beginning at the South z corner of Sec. h, TWP 24 N, Range 5 £, WM, thence N 1°H6'12"E 1.80' to the true point of beginning, thence continuing N 19 1Std2"E 150! thence S 87°59'W3"E 19.00! thence S I°IG'12"W 150! thence N 87°59'43"W 149.00! to the true point of beginning. More generally known as: Property lying North of 2th Ave. N. between M Street and Sunset Blvd, ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID Rezone ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON May 6, 1968 in the Council Chambers AT 8:00 P.M, £0 VOICE THEIR PROLEST OR OBJECTION TO SAME, 4 / : ! a AL foe JLter Ae hi HEIMIE NELSON, CITY CLERK DATE OF PUBLICATION: April 2h, 1968 CERTIFICATION niet ennt aoe I, Cicttaen C Novallon HEREBY CERTIFY (HAT THREE (3) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DCCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME iN THREE CONSP ONE COPY POSTED AT THE — CUOUS PLACES ON TIE PROPERTY / CITY HALL MSCRIBED ABOVE AND , RENTON OW re QDY (GCE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. - 2 E ff sronep? Qe hack (- Shah R Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF KING Face ame JOR GEANGO- My VOREOR....... being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that ....3.)2.¢8 the oat dee. Of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a semi-weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a semi- weekly newspaper in Renton, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to-wit, King County, Washington. That the annexed isa eae CTST SER Bia dias vexcneuanerexseeneuesnees as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period (0) (eee ONO secesnmnccxecs consecutive issues, commencing on the wee ot day of 0.0.2 (19 2.8......, and ending the wed Lt May OF orcs AP Lege, 19.08 both dates inclaaive and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged. for the foregoing publication is the sum of $... amare HO nich has heen: paid in full at the rate of $3.20 per folio of one hundred words a onthe nist Msertion and $2.40 per folio of one hundred words for each ‘ ie ween ee A P y oe; ) & i Ae i { ; 19. sy ale _a* Subscribed and sworn to before me this ..................06. 4&0. day of seveee eT OT ded sscsossssersees ,19. esiding at Renton, King County. — Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June 9th, 1955. —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK « RENTON, WASHINGTON CITY HALL, CEDAR RIVER PARK, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ¢ ALPINE 5-3464 May 15, 1968 Mr. Bruce Mahler, Land & Tax Agent King County Assessor's Office County Court House, Room 201 Seattle, Washington 98104 Dear Sirs Enclosed is a certified copy of Ordinance No,2403 changing the zoning of certain properties within the City of Renton, as passed and approved on this _ 13th day of May 1968 e Very truly yours, CITY OF RENTON a4 i“ ; : a oH Me Leoye ie ult WA ZA, wale Ae Helmie W. Nelson City Clerk HWN/h Enclosure (1) rr STATE OF ae wee Ac CY CLERK SS. ‘ T te sf owls FRILE & COUNTY OF KING ( ia cor’ | city Clerk in and for che City of Renton, ) Jing Arc en 4 pone 7’- Vv/6-E8R ce is a true and correct ars on file 1, as it ar copy of Ordinsn : ar in my office, and co f. ven published agcording ; to law. : ORDINANCE NO. 7~ YoF In Witness Whereof | have hereunto cei and end affixed the seal of the City of Renton, this... AN_ORDINANCE OF THE CLTY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL SUBURBAN DISTRICT’ (GS-1) TO RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-2). WHEREAS under Chapter VII, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the ‘Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Suburban District (GS-1); and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the City Clerk on or about February 8, 1968, which petition was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about liarch 27, 1968, which hearing was duly continued, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission and the Petitioner-Owner having duly amended his petition for rezoning, and said rezoning request, as amended, being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residential District (R-2); the City Engineer and the Planning Director are hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Shepard Heights Addition, according to the plat recorded in Vol. 46 of Plats, page 79 Records of King County, Washington. Also together with that portion of the SW % of the SE % of Sec. 4, TWP 23 N, Range 5 E, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the South ~% corner of Sec. 4, TWP 23 N, Range 5S E, W.M. thence N 1°16'12" E 480' to the true point of beginning, thence continuing N 1°16'12" — 150'thence S 87°59'43" E 149,00' thence S 1°16'12" W 150" thence N 87°59'43" W 149.00° to the true point of beginning. Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and legal publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 13th day of May, 1968.. Fuse “ Donald W. Custer, Mayor Approved as to form: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney DALE Ur FUBLILAIIUN maAY 15 1968 fy | NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Gh fu? RENTON CITY COUNCIL a RENTON, WASHINGTON aa A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, ON May 6, 1968. AT 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER A PETITION, Mamas amended for Rezone from GS-I to R-2 on THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 4 and , Block |, Shepard Heights Addition, according to the plat recorded in Vol. 46 of Plats, page 79 Records of King County, Washington, Also together with that portion of the SW + of the SE 4 of Sec. 4, TWP 23 N, Range 5 E, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the South + corner of Sec. 4, TWP 23 N, Range 5 E, W.M,. thence N 1°16'12"E 480" to the true point of beginning, thence continuing N I 1St12"E 150! thence S 87°59'W3Z"E 149,00" thence S I°16'12"W 150' thence N 87°59'L3"w 149,00! to the true point of beginning. More generally known as: Property lying North of 12th Ave. N. between M Street and Sunset Blvd, ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID Rezone ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON May 6, 1968 in the Council Chambers AT 8:00 P.M, TO VOICE THEIR PROTEST OR OBJECTION TO SAME, Z HELMIE NELSON, CITY CLERK DATE OF PUBLICATION: April 2h, 1968 ‘ ’ CERTIFICATION HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE (3) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AND ONE COPY POSTED AT THE CITY HALL, RENTON ON AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. SIGNED: ATTEST: P i SLATE WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT RENTON, WASHINGTON INTER-OFFICE MEMO DATE; _ May 9, oe TO: _Helmie Nelson, City Clerk FROM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney pb 7 RE: Rezoning ae" pb bd “ ie Ae bea hey } We are enclosing herewith stencil for the proposed rezoning of Ray Brown's property to Residential District (R-2). Would you please have the City Engineer and Panning Director check same over to be sure it is correct. Dear Helmie: We remain, Very truly yours, GERARD M. SHELLAN; CITY Attorney GMS /aw enc. INTER-OFFICE MEMO DATE: ae ee YES TO: Helmie Nelson, City Clerk FROM: Jack Wilson, City Engineer RE: SAO wD: <2 I hereby certify that the legal description contained in the attached je Rw SS of the i Ecown) property is correct. pea le Wilson, City Engineer Gute — We. Reg ew 5-6-68 Minutes - Renton City Council Meeting (Cont.) PUBLIC HEARING: Reconsiderat’ on of Ray Brown request for rezone amended to R-2 This being the date set, the hearing was declared open. There:'being no written com- munications nor audience remarks, it was moved by Perry, seconded by Barei, that the hearing be closed. The motion carried and the hearing was declared closed. Council action was invited and it was moved by Trimm, seconded by Grant, to approve the R-2 request with referral to the Law and Ordinance Committee for the necessary Ordinance. The motion carried. Inquiries from the audience followed regarding possible use under the R-2. Planning Director Ericksen read from the Code the use allowed and it was noted that in order to secure a special permit application would have to be filed with the Planning Commission followed by public notice and public hearing. It was urged that persons wishing to be advised of any public hearing which should result leave their names with the Planning Department. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed L.I.D. 258, Kennydale area on Lake Wn. Blvd.3; S.E. 91st Place, SE 9lst Street; S.E. 92nd Street and S.E. 93rd Street This being the date set, the hearing was declared open. Communication was read from J. R. Faweett, 9003 - 100th Ave. S.E., inquiring regarding 35% increase in cost over prior estimate and urging city participation, suggesting 60% since this is the addi- tional cost since the July, 1967 proposal which was lost due to protest. Mr. Fawcett had been instrumental in formation of the district and upon inquiry,it was noted that there was no protest at this time and City Engineer Wilson displayed drawing of the proposed line advising that the area was divided at the point where gravity flow runs to the North for connection and this is part of an over all system which could be pro- jected however since the last was defeated by protest it was felt a smaller unit as requested will be instituted at this time. It was noted that the increase in cost is mainly attributed to the smaller size of the district with fewer benefitting property owners sharing,and to the fact that the Lake Wn. Blvd. area requires 10" pipe and only one side of the street will be in the district,limiting the number participating. Mr. Jack Hodges inquired regarding reason his property was not included and was advised that his residence is beyond the division of the district since gravity flow to the connecting line would run to the South and this would involve another cost factor. Mr. Graham Bell commented that his assessment was for two lots and his house extends onto the other lot and a second connection would be unnecessary. City Engineer Wilson advised that consideration is given if such is the event. Inquiry was made as to the possibility of cutting costs by elimination of manholes and City Engineer Wilson stated the State Law required manholes and this would be necessary whether the district were extended or not. It was noted that part of the area is railroad property and is not included in the benefitting properties. Upon inquiry it was noted that the total district will contain approximately 640 ft. of 10" line, 3200 of 8" line and about 1100 of 6" line or about 3850 main line and 1150 side sewers Mrs. Roberta Hodges in- quired regarding storm water run off and problems caused on their property. City Engineer Wilson suggested interceptor drains lead into the storm system as the ulti- mate answer but that no sanitary sewer system is under consideration at this time and would not be unless the whole area could be served. He stated that the Engineering Department along with the County Health Department have begun investigations of faults in septic tanks in the area which will be available at such time as another L.I.D. is commenced. Mayor Custer added this is the first effort of the Joint Agreement with King County Health and Sanitation Department and the Kennydale area will be the first work under this proposal. As there was no further comment, it was moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Perry, the hearing be closed. Carried. Mr. Fawcett inquired regarding possible city participation in the present L.I.D. where the oversize pipe is required for future service and it was noted that this factor will be considered during the public hearing on the final assessment roll. Moved by Shane, seconded by Grant, to refer the matter to the Law and Ordinance Committee. Carried. Councilman Barei at this time moved that the City initiate annexation proceedings for Kennydale and Talbot Hill "Islands" and that the matter be placed on the Primary Election Ballot in September of this year. The motion was seconded by Perry. It was noted that petitions have been circulated in the Talbot Hill area and City Attorney Shellan advised that in such instance the City will have to pay the election cost and money will need to be appropriated. Schellert suggested alternate method by 10% petition of the owners, and not try to force the annexation since previous attempts with nearly 70% signers had resulted in failure. Barei felt that new residents might make the difference at this time. Edwards stated the people should be given an opportunity to petition. After discussion as to timeliness and order of business, question was called and vote was dissenting,resulting in request for roll cali vote. The roll call: Aye: Delaurenti, Perry, Bruce, Grant and Barei. No: Garrett, Morris, Schellert, Trimm, Edwards, Maxin, and Shane. The motion lost as had been declared by the Chair. -2- 5-6-68 Minutes - Renton City Council Meeting (Cont.) PUBLIC HEARING: Reconsiderat’ on of Ray Brown request for rezone amended to R-2 This being the date set, the hearing was declared open. There being no written com- munications nor audience remarks, it was moved by Perry, seconded by Barei, that the hearing be closed. The motion carried and the hearing was declared closed. Council action was invited and it was moved by Trimm, seconded by Grant, to approve the R-2 request with referral to the Law and Ordinance Committee for the necessary Ordinance. The motion carried. Inquiries from the audience followed regarding possible use under the R-2. Planning Director Ericksen read from the Code the use allowed and it was noted that in order to secure a special permit application would have to be filed with the Planning Commission followed by public notice and public hearing. It was urged that persons wishing to be advised of any public hearing which should result leave their names with the Planning Department. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed L.1I.D. 258, Kennydale area on Lake Wn. Blvd.; S.E. 91st Place, SE 9lst Street; S.E. 92nd Street and S.E. 93rd Street This being the date set, the hearing was declared open. Communication was read from J. Re Fawcett, 9003 - 100th Ave. S.E., inquiring regarding 35% increase in cost over prior estimate and urging city participation, suggesting 60% since this is the addi- tional cost since the July, 1967 proposal which was lost due to protest. Mr. Fawcett had been instrumental in formation of the district and upon inquiry,it was noted that there was no protest at this time and City Engineer Wilson displayed drawing of the proposed line advising that the area was divided at the point where gravity flow runs to the North for connection and this is part of an over all system which could be pro- jected however since the last was defeated by protest it was felt a smaller unit as requested will be instituted at this time. It was noted that the increase in cost is mainly attributed to the smaller size of the district with fewer benefitting property owners sharing,and to the fact that the Lake Wn. Blvd. area requires 10" pipe and only one side of the street will be in the district,limiting the number participating. Mr. Jack Hodges inquired regarding reason his property was not included and was advised that his residence is beyond the division of the district since gravity flow to the connecting line would run to the South and this would involve another cost factor. Mr. Graham Bell commented that his assessment was for two lots and his house extends onto the other lot and a second connection would be unnecessary. City Engineer Wilson advised that consideration is given if such is the event. Inquiry was made as to the possibility of cutting costs by elimination of manholes and City Engineer Wilson stated the State Law required manholes and this would be necessary whether the district were extended or not. It was noted that part of the area is railroad property and is not included in the benefitting properties. Upon inquiry it was noted that the total district will contain approximately 640 ft. of 10" line, 3200 of 8" line and about 1109 of 6" line or about 3850 main line and 1150 side sewers Mrs. Roberta Hodges in- quired regarding storm water run off and problems caused on their property. City Engineer Wilson suggested interceptor drains lead into the storm system as the ulti- mate answer but that no sanitary sewer system is under consideration at this time and would not be unless the whole area could be served. He stated that the Engineering Department along with the County Health Department have begun investigations of faults in septic tanks in the area which will be available at such time as another L.I.D. is commenced. Mayor Custer added this is the first effort of the Joint Agreement with King County Health and Sanitation Department and the Kennydale area will be the first work under this proposal. As there was no further comment, it was moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Perry, the hearing be closed. Carried. Mr. Fawcett inquired regarding possible city participation in the present L.I.D. where the oversize pipe is required for future service and it was noted that this factor will be considered during the public hearing on the final assessment roll. Moved by Shane, seconded by Grant, to refer the matter to the Law and Ordinance Committee. Carried. Councilman Barei at this time moved that the City initiate annexation proceedings for Kennydale and Talbot Hill "Islands" and that the matter be placed on the Primary Election Ballot in September of this year. The motion was seconded by Perry. It was noted that petitions have been circulated in the Talbot Hill area and City Attorney Shellan advised that in such instance the City will have to pay the election cost and money will need to be appropriated. Schellert suggested alternate method by 10% petition of the owners, and not try to force the annexation since previous attempts with nearly 70% signers had resulted in failure. Barei felt that new residents might make the difference at this time. Edwards stated the people should be given an opportunity to petition. After discussion as to timeliness and order of business, question was called and vote was dissenting,resulting in request for roll cali vote. The roll call: Aye: Delaurenti, Perry, Bruce, Grant and Barei. No: Garrett, Morris, Schellert, Trimm, Edwards, Maxin, and Shane. The motion lost as had been declared by the Chair. -2- April 25, 1968 Re: Ray Brown Amended Rezone Application, R - 2 Dear Property Owner: The Renton City Council, at its regular meeting of April 22, 1968, has set May 6, 1968 at 8:00 p.m. in the Renton City Council Chambers, as the date for reconsidering Rezone Request of Mr. Ray Brown. All interested persons are invited to be present and to be heard on the matter. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Lb. JI Uh / Helmie W. Nelson City Clerk JN /ew NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON CLTY COUNCIL RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL AT ITS. REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, ON May 6, 1968. AT 8:00 P.M, TO CCNSIDER A PETITION, ReRas amended for Rezone from GS-1 to R-2 on THE FOLLGJING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 4 and l, 8lock 1, Shepard Heights Addition, according to the plat recorded in Vol. 46 of Plats, page 79 Records of King County, Washington, Also together: | with that portion of the SW 4 of the SE 4 of Sec. 4, TWP 23 N, Range 5 E, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the South + corner of Sec. 1, TWP 23 N, Range 5 E, WM. thence N 1°16'12"E 480! to the true point of beginning, thence continuing N IS 1St12"E 150! thence S 87°59'43"E 19.00! thence S 1°16"12"W 150" thence N 87°59'L3"w 19.00! to the true point of beginning. More generally known as: Property lying North of 12th Ave. N. between M Street and Sunset Blvd. ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID Rezone ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON “May 6, 1968 in the Council Chambers AT 8:00 P.M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTEST OR OBJECTION TO SAME, HL, Povtaiitd y (aa i” HELMIE NELSON, CLY CLERK DATE OF PUBLICATION: April 24, 1958 CERTIFICATION t, Wena CC. Heoginbor HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THRER (3) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DCCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE #8 eer, REMLON ON Gore (2 . (40G AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. a ¥ Tear, * > . ~ SIGNED: “Aichasd (4 Cai L& & ATTESS: * Aprit.23, 1968 Renton City Council City Hall Renton, Washington re: Rezoning petition of Ray Brown approved at City Council meeting held May 6, 1968 Gentlemen: This is to confirm my request that the above rezone /petition should be amended from R-3 to R~2., Appl ATION e \ , Very truly yours, & Raymond Brown oS eee ee rere SD ee Cam bint neg AL fesie’ Fee — 4 7 , / . 50 SAP e7 S3E S¥G.60 fe ee BS f° 762 150! Chewee WN §7-59-¥3WIGO' To THE Gb. ah ae Kes Sectiod 4 FJewosip 23 Noem, Range Easy yt. CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ROOM 104, CITY BALL WASHINGTON RENTON April 25, 1968 Re: Ray Brown Amended Rezone Application, R - 2 Dear Property Owner: The Renton City Council, at its regular meeting of April 22, 1968, has set May 6, 1968 at 8:00 p.m. in the Renton City Council Chambers, as the date for reconsidering Rezone Request of Mr. Ray Brown. All interested persons are invited to be present and to be heard on the matter. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON ebm H Ulan Helmie W. Nelson City Clerk NWN /ew This letter has been sent to all petitioners, April 26 1968 (29) oF Re, & aoe % ~ we re : . O Savoy) 2 OFFIC OF THE CYTY CLIERE « RIIN'TON, WAQINGLON 4 ull, H — ‘3 CITY HALL, CEDAR RIVER PARK, RENTON, VIASHIMQYON 98085 © ALPING 3-34664 a tems #: & % . & Say .* *7 expiine © | , April 165 1968 . _ tw sae fp ben ype 6 OO bed Mr. Ray Brown 4114 Sunset Blvd. E. Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Ray Brown Appeal of Planning Commission R~% Rezone Denial Dear Mr. Brown: he Renton City Council at its regular meeting of April 15, 1968 has denied your appeal for Re% zoning on property north of 12th Ave. North between "M" Street and Sunset Blvd. East. We attach hereto excerpt of minutes from the meeting for your further inforsation,. : Very truly yours, CITY OF RENTON Helmia W. Nelson City Clerk 2 te Li, PA 4 HALAL PCR ALL AL 7 COA are, By Gwen Marshall Deputy City Clerk Gi/sk cc: Planning Commission Enclosure (1) “ yt ee g- a : Renton City Council Cite Hall Renton, Wasi ugton fis (Protest. te apoeal frém Planning Com- mission recommendation of .R-2 Zoning for nroperty: petitione® for 2-3 under : the name of*Ray Brown ie ee Gentlemen: ey * We; the wndersigned wish to atfirm our protest. to the ~ending rezone onredlefoem, property located North of. 12th Avenue Worth between 125th Ave. ©.£. (@omonnon)y. snown AS) M=St.}) @me@- sumect BlVd., Rav Brown et al, Apol. Moy Relidt6-68. We take exception to Mr. Brown's contention that R-3 would serve a* a “good buffer” for this area, and we feel that the power iine i-.an effective division between business and” residential areas, We maintain that an R-3 would havé an adverse effect on the existing sinele family area, and would inerease traffic. We feel that lhir. Brown's statement in his a awpeal, about the traffic is contradictory, as multi-family howto vould Purther é congest the area with more vehicles. We also.feel it is vre- ae mature in view of current uncertainty about the Sunset Mishway ar nak widening and access from same, i: We feel that a precedent has already been established with ‘an .R<2 zonine ona portion of the vroperty in question, anproximatels ten: months ago. We further :maintain+tuat, in view of existing single familk;, residences, the R=3 high-density: zoning is incomvatible. Resvectfully submitted, ‘ A) ys bh ” ; , - - _VAste <, Pohten [t? 0: Bei at fravtie | Raa FIV fo Ather 1210 1 ht ae ce: Dra. Waguerk O gue — (3/6 PB Lh. OAT “fll ih 1 OOS 7 Be Tiewron in. Wealfiaer, /228. JU. SH Cantos SALE S727 ye we : Co (PA re. | iJ 2a So CR lett fh. bet /20F% 4, a: Ree = acbeiuas [pot lf Ce a f23h-77- 7. Barbara d Ms thas: /234 Me ft 2k Lgaler & Gaze | OE) Ata ee ae « ee, Pathepr BA dee she “FP be. paul) Bia) ws, spon JASE N97 Lf, EBs a |A%L Jn dt Marlon Trang Sim ; oe if woals [264 Dn Lt bec4n ee co bes Fs 4 BOY - A? Sr cape rs , Y HAL oo ay Peel Soon Ait. é Lilac hers “228 PH iy , Kenta ; a 12ot M st, Reatn. | ames hi Yard Ohta Mast 29 dt. Kenlin, We FE R R E ET ys = yo a pril ll, 1968 Renton City Council City Hall Renton, Wash ngton ra: Protest to avpeal from Planni ing Com- mission recommendation of R-2 Zoning for property petitionec for Re3 under the name of Ray Brown Gentlemen: We, the undersigned wish to affirm our protest to the cending rezone avpeal for property located North of 12th Avenue North between 125th Ave. S.E. (comonnonly know as M-St.) and Sunset Blvd., Ray Brown et al, Apvl. No. Rl6-68. ie take excep stion to Mr. Brown's contention that R-3 would serve asa "rood buffer" for this area, and we feel that the power iine is an effective division between business and residential areas, We maintain that an R-3 would have an adverse effect on the existing single family area, and would increase traffic. We feol that Mr. Brownts statement in his appeal, about the traffic is contradictory, as multi-family housing would further | congest the area with more vehicles. We also feel it is pre- mature in view of current uncertainty about the Sunset Highway widening and access from same, We feel that a precedent has already been established with an R-2 zoning on a portion of the vroperty in question, approximately ten months ago. We further maintain that, in view of existing single family residences, the Re3 high-density zoning is incompatible. Respectfully submitted, Call Steeple Nee L362 AF ar i Vy fo STF ‘ o. ee: Z aa wipe ra me AD De WF? ‘des J Lealee F208 (tO ew — 8208 127 Aven. BOP. Ce Ok je ae Pathin ate Bae at fPavtane boris Tv fo abhe~ [4/0 mbt Panton Mra. Wag. anak CO. Co Aa 4210. Fi dd Cue ae Ae, Faget 13/1 B Ad BI. Time row rot Ts /22%, ea Sp Cte 42s 2 gz filo WW Sb Rete YAO, 9 LE gato /2ZZ2A S787 hoanrev A (ABD 0 ig is | oth ff. | (207 i. 3 Rabe | oe ockesep. [pot mM : JA 2k =A | : J at: } . : ie Den Ha dete [Ah "In St Marlen SP p0f DO SF we ek 1204 ln Lt a : tay Me tein | | 25 TH bt. Kaplan 120% MA at, Renton. A t a4 Be ac l 1 RR R AR aS ST S Qe _ Lay — OO Rage : , Rentoh Planning Commission Meeting March 27, 1968 Agenda. Page .2 Staff Comments: Proposed development is a continuation of Victoria Park Nos. 1 and 2 located southeasterly of Victoria Park No. 2. A total of 72 lots is proposed. Principal access would be from Talbot Road, although an additional temporary access is being proposed for the development to tie in with Victoria Park No. 7 and the crossing of the Benson Highway. Commission Comments: The single access at the present time would result in the deadending of the development and could conceivably present problems. REZONE APPLICATIONS aa (d) BROWN, RAY et al, Appl. No. R-446-68, rezone from R-2 and GS-1 to R-3; property located north of i2th Ave. N. between.125th Ave. S.E. and Sunset Blvd. Total Area--2.3 ac. . Existing Zoning-~R-2 and GS-1 Existing Use-~~single family residential . Principal Access--M St. Proposed Use--medium density multi-family residential Comprehensive Plan--low density multi-family residential Staff Comments: Proposed development for apartments would have Significant impact on the adjacent residential area. The widening of Sunset Highway is presently in process by the State Highway. Department with preliminary surveys having been completed. It-:is anticipated that acyquisition of necessary right of way will he completed this year, with possible construction being undertaken to a limited degree in 1969. A petition containing 29 signatures of residents in the area in opposition to the proposed rezone was received in the Planning Department office. Commission Comments: The proposed development, in view of the widening of Sunset Highway. which is now in process, appears to be premature. (e) RICHARDS, EUGENE M., Appl. No. R-449-68, rezone from G-6000 to L-l; property located on 86th Ave. S. between S. Is3rd St. and FAL 405. Total Area~~-6900 sq. ft. Existing Zoning-~G~6000 Existing Use~--single family residential Principal Access~--86th Ave. S, Proposed Use--light industrial Comprehensive Plan--light industrial Staff Comments: The house located at the center.of the property has now been acquired by the applicant and will be incorporated into the total development of this and the adjacent property (the house has already been removed at this time)... Mr. Richards has been contacted and requested to meet with the department to review proposed restrictive covenants. Commission Comments: Suggested that Commission members consider possible M-P or L-1l zoning with restrictive covenants. MINUTES RENTON CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING April 15, 1968 Office of the City Clerk The regular meeting of the Renton City Council was called to order at 8:00 p.m. by D. W. Custer, Mayor, in the Council Chambers, City Hall, and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was recited in unison by the assembly. ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL MEMBERS: Schellert, Delaurenti, Perry, Trimm, Edwards, Maxin, Bruce, Grant, Shane and Barei. Moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Maxin, that the absent Councilmen be excused. The motion carried. OFFICIALS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS PRESENT: Gwen Marshall, Deputy City Clerk, Dorothea Gossett, City Treasurer, G. M. Shellan, City Attorney, C. S. Williams, Chief. of Police, M. C. Walls, Fire Chief, Jack Wilson, City Engineer, Vern Church, Purchasing Director, Gene Coulon, Park Director, Sven Johnson, Building Director, Jack Jones, Library Director, Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director, Vic TeGantvoort, Street Commissioner, Ted Bennett, Utility Accountant, Jan Klippert, Administrative Asst. to the Mayor and Del Bennett, Traffic Engineer. Moved by Trimm, seconded by Perry, that the Minutes of the tprevious meeting of April 8th, be approved as written. The motion carried. Mayor Custer announced that the City had submitted 31,371 persons for population census count and the State had allowedomly24,550. Written reply had been sent by Mayor Custer and an audience has been requested with Dr. Slavin, Director of the new Planning and Community Affairs Agency, to discuss the matter further. Mayor Custer advised that he has received a copy of the proposed Initiative No. 244 which provides for earmarking two mills of State moneys from property taxes for County use which affects cities. The document is available if anyone might wish to look it over. PUBLIC HEARING: Ray Brown appeal of Planning Commission R-3 rezone denial. Property located north of 12th Avenue North between 125th Avenue S.E. and Sunset. / Mr. Ray Brown requested that the Council not act at this trime but that the hearing be | extended one week as he felt additional ttime was needed on the matter. Moved by Bruce and seconded by Grant, that the delay be granted. Upon inquiry as to number of persons present just for this hearing, 16 persons were counted and in deference to the representation, the motion to continue the hearing failed. The hearing was declared open and communications were read including a petition signed by ten businessmen in the immediate vicinity of the subject property who were for the proposed use which they felt was needed in the area; a petition of objection signed by 28 persons; and letter from the Planning Director outlining Planning Commission actions and reasons for denial which included that the zoning, in view of plans for widening of Sunset Highway, was / premature; that the rezone would be incompatible with the surrounding single family residen- tial area; increased traffic would have a detrimental effect and regard was also given to the considerable interest and objection of the residents of the neighborhood. The Commission recommended R-2 as the highest and best use for the property. Upon motion by Perry, seconded by Grant, which carried, slides were shown by Planning Director Ericksen showing access from Sunset Blvd. and from "M"* Street and various views of the property, the residences and the business in the area. Audience comment was invited and Mr. Ray Brown urged consideration of the R-3 zoning, noting that there are a total of 13 houses involved with 11 being on the far side of "M" Street and only two on the side of the property in question; that a portion of the property is already R-2 and a part GS-1 but with a water tower and power line in the vicinity it was not felt that R-1 would be a good use for the property. He noted various business and multiple residential uses in the area and stated than widening of Sunset would absorb additional traffic. Mr. Eugene Methven, 1234 "M" Street, Mr. and Mrs. George Johnson, 1222 'M" Street, Mrs. Dennis Vadney, 1210 "M" Street and Mrs. Dennis Ossenkop, 3208 - 12th Avenue Nogth, spoke against the rezone noting possible tax increases, loss of privacy, additional traffic and access problems and that the power line is a very desirable buffer zone. Mr. Richard Stredicke, 3916 - 10th Ct. No., Member of the Planning Commission, stated he had recommended that the portion already zoned R-2 remain the same and that the GS-1 be zoned R-1 as the highest use, which was voted down.He recalled Planning Commission reasons for denial noting his primary reason being factor of Sunset being widened and proposed use being premature. Councilman Shane noted that when the property owner is ready to build than that is time for the development and he did not see how the time could be considered pramature. (Cont. next page) > a Minutes - Renton City Council Meeting 4-15-68 PUBLIC HEARING: Ray Brown Appeal of Planning Commission R-3 rezone denial (Cont.) During discussion it was noted that 74 units are proposed and 109 parking spaces, and at the conclusion of audience comments, it was moved by Trimm, seconded by Shane, that the hearing be closed. Carried. The hearing was declared closed and council action invited. Moved by Perry, seconded by Edwards, that the appeal be denied. Discussion ensued with regard to the fact that such denial could conclude further action for six months and upon suggestion that another zoning might be warranted, Attorney Shellan advised that the Council could not arbitrarily change the zoning without consent of petitioner to amend his application, but if he should consent, the Council may so amend and refer the matter back to the Planning Commission. Mr. Brown was asked if he would care to amend his petition and he stated three other parties were involved in the project and he would consuit them. Discussion ensued regarding prior appeals and revisions after which the pending motion was voted upon and carried, denying the appeal. Upon inquiry as to how soon the matter could come up again attention was called to the fact that reconsideration could be requested tonight or next week by a Council Member voting affirmatively to deny, otherwise there may be no further action taken until six months from this date. COMMUNICATIONS: Card from Mary Corbett acknowledged sympathy of the Mayor, City Treasurer, City Clerk, and the Council in family death. (Mother of Councilman Schellert) Letter from Park Director Coulon submitted and recommended for payment, Progress Estimate No. 4, due Contury Construction Company on the Grandstand Construction, $28,205.60, C.AG. 1220-67. Moved by Trimm, seconded by Schellert, to concur in the payment with referral to the Auditing and Accounting Committee. Carried. Letters and supporting documents from Johnston-Campanella, requested payment on Progress Estimates and service invoices for Absher Construction Company, Est. #9, $118,208.32 on new city hall construction, C.AG. 1156-67; Chapman Electric, Est. 4, City Hall Electrical Contract, $23,655.37, C.AG. 1158-67;McKinstry Company, Est. 4, City Hall Mechanical Contract, $75,554.13, C.AG. 1160-67; and Johnston, Campanella, Murakami & Co., Architectural services, Est. 21, $1,487.43. Moved by Trimm, seconded by Edwards, to concur in the pay- ments with referral to the Auditing and Accounting Committee. Carried. Applications were read requesting that Rainier Amusement Company be granted the required license to operate an additional Pinball Machine and coin-type pool table at Earlington Golf Course and three pinball machines at the Sahara Tavern. Moved by Delaurenti, and seconded by Perry, to refer the applications to the Police and License Committee with power to act. Carried. Letter from Gwen Marshall, Deputy City Clerk, recalled that $10,000.00 was placed into the Urban Arterial Fund in December, 1967 with additional moneys to be appropriated as payments were received from the State. $13,152.64 has been received and it is necessary at this time to appropriate from excess revenues in the Urban Arterial Fund into the Budget, Urban Arterial Fund Account 1250/605, Structures and Improvements. Referral to the Law and Ordinance Committee for proper Resolution was recommended. Moved by Schellert, seconded by Shane, to concur in the recommendation. Carried. Letter from City Engineer Wilson reported recommendation that attached invoice due Lewis- Redford, Engineering Consultants, on services in connection with the North 3rd Street North 4th Street project obe funded from the Urban Arterial Fund in sum of $10,859.87, be paid at this time. Moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Bruce, to concur with referral to the Auditing and Accounting Committee. Carried. Letter from City Engineer Wilson reported, regarding letter of intent to annex property to Renton in vicinity of South 122nd Street and Rainier Avenue, submitted by Peoples Bank, that 100% of the assessed valuation of the property is represented by the signature on the letter. The area comprises approximately 1.15 acres with assessed valuation of $350.00. Mr. Kenneth Burroughs, 2112 Wn. Building, Seattle, representing the property owners, upon inquiry indicated willingness to assume pro rata share of the City's pre-existing bonded indebtedness and acknowledged Council's intent to accept the portion of the Comprehensive Plan covering the subject area, shown as Commercial use. Moved by Schellert, seconded by Perry, to accept the annexation proposal and to authorize the property owner to circulate the proper petition ind*cating thereon debt acceptance and provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, as outlined above. The motion carried. =9= ” y . ed ys PLANNING DEPARTMENT e RENTON, WASHINGTON wlll Sy CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 @ ALPINE 5-3464 Teed e = ORF capita * April 15, 1968 The Honorable Donald W. Custer, Mayor Members of the City Council Renton, Washington Re: Ray Brown et al Rezone Appeal Appl. No. R-446-68, rezone from R-2 and GS-1 to R-3 Property located north of 12th Avenue N. between M Street and Sunset Boulevard E. Gentlemen: The Planning Commission at its public hearing meeting of March 27, 1968, reviewed the rezone request of Mr. Ray Brown et al. The property in question has the following general characteristics: Total Area--2.3 ac. Existing Zoning--R-2 and GS-1 Existing Use--single family residential Principal Access--M St. Proposed Use--medium density multi-family residential, 74 apartment units with 109 parking spaces Comprehensive Plan--low to medium density multi-family residential The property in question fronts on M Street and is presently predominately built up as a single family residential area. The northerly portion of the property directly adjacent to the Sunset Highway was previously rezoned R-2 in June 1967. At this time the property zoned R-2 has not been developed. The anticipated widening of the Sunset Highway will have some effect on the property in question since some additional right of way may be acquired. The preliminary surveys on the widening have been completed by the Highway Department with possible acquisition of right of way starting from the early fall of 1968 and bids for construction to be let in the fall of 1969. The amount of right of way to be ac- quired, however, is unknown at this time. The residents of the area submitted a petition containing 29 signatures in opposition to the proposed rezone at the time of the public hearing before the Planning Commission. Mayor and City Council April 15, 1968 Page 2 After considerable study of the area on the part Planning Commission and discussion with both the cant and the residents of the area, the Planning sion denied the rezone request for the following of the appli- Commis-—- reasons: tow The proposed apartment development in this area is premature; the widening of Sunset Highway being a contributing factor; The rezone request is incompatible with the surrounding area which is single family residential; The increase in traffic as a result of apartment development would have detri- mental effects on the single family area; The considerable interest and objections to the rezone as expressed by the presence of residents in the neighborhood at this hearing. The Planning Commission further recommended to the City Council that the highest and best use of the subject property be that allowed under the R-2 zone. Very truly yours, af Zr ee at jay laa jas eu jae fom fo few eae & sa m c : ap e at ar s a re ee e nw oe ey oe = oe sa ed hal ed el a bi fairs na rejetit nee ali ee eee pe ome y+ “A \ ey Bm Ne e s iy Vg c NC L BE LAYS : ia yt (p m e o m e e e s LD E U H GD se ag pa ti t ae s iG ho ih TE +4 paar vo Bale O yA PLANNING DEPARTMENT e RENTON, WASHINGTON a & = & > - CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 @ ALPINE 5-3464 A 2 Wy & Pop o& “A : 7 CapitAt April 15, 1966 The Honorable Donald W. Custer, Mayor Members of the City Council Renton, Washington Re: Ray Brown et al Rezone Appeal Appl. No. R-446-68, rezone from R-2 and GS-1 to R-3 Property located north of 12th Avenue N. between M Street and Sunset Boulevard E. Gentlemen: The Planning Commission at its public hearing meeting of March 27, 1968, reviewed the rezone request of Mr. Ray Brown et al. The property in question has the following general characteristics: Total Area--2.3 ac. Existing Zoning--R-2 and GS-1 Existing Use--single family residential Principal Access--M St. Proposed Use--medium density multi-family residential, 74 apartment units with 109 parking spaces Comprehensive Plan--low to medium density multi-family residential “The property in question fronts on M Street and is presently predominately built up as a single family residential area. The northerly -.portion of the property directly adjacent to the Sunset Highway was previously rezoned R-2 in June 1967. At this time the property zoned R-2 has not been developed. The anticipated widening of the Sunset Highway will have some effect on the property in question since some additional right of way may be acquired. The preliminary surveys on the widening have been completed by the Highway Department with possible acguisition of right of way starting from the early fall of 1968 and bids for construction to be let in the fall of 1969. The amount of right of way to be ac- quired, however, is unknown at this time. The residents of the area submitted a petition containing 29 signatures in opposition to the proposed rezone at the time of the public hearing before the Planning Commission. Mayor and City Council April 15, 1968 Page 2 After considerable study of the area on the part Planning Commission and discussion with both the cant and the residents of the area, the Planning sion denied the rezone request for the following of the appli~ Commis- reasons: 1. The proposed apartment development in this area is premature; the widening of Sunset Highway being a contributing factor; 2. The rezone request is incompatible with the surrounding area which is single family residential; 3. The increase in traffic as a result of apartment development would have detri- mental effects on the single family area; 4, The considerable interest and objections to the rezone as expressed by the presence of residents in the neighborhood at this hearing. The Planning Commission further recommended to the City Council that the highest and best use of the subject property be that allowed under the R-2 zone. Very truly yours, we A 1B LGLPIn / EA. Gordon Y. friakoak Planning’ Director ( Y aad ? A-L-2. \ ~ , “Ces Co Renton City Council City Hall Renton, Washington re: Appeal of Ray Brown from Planning Commission for R-3 zoning Gentlemen: We the undersigned, who own property next to or near the property Brown seeks R-3 zoning for, or merchants in the immediate area, hereby lend our support to this petition because of the need for this type of zoning in this area: ADDRESS [10 Bak Al, 10?. ove’ R Fp Sz. at LAA J, MANA ANTS <= Sore Saw ix ISijeker ‘Blok x ace ry = : a eee Lhd. ae A . 7 (Beg Z Gy (ies Soe oe Lael. gt eh he & Renton City Council City Hall Renton, Washington Rs Protest to anneal from Planning Com- mission recommendation of R-2 Zoning for property petitioned for R-3 under the name of Ray Brown Gentlemen: We, the undersigned wish to affirm our protest to the vending rezone anneal for property located North of leth Avenue North between 125th Ave. °.8. (wonomnonly known as | M-St.) and Sunset Blvd., Ray Brown et al, Apol. No. R-lJ,6-68, We take exception to Mr. Brown's contention that R-3 would serve as a "good buffer" for this area, and we feel that the power line is an effective division between business and residential areas. We maintain that an R-3 would have an adverse effect on the existing single family area, and would increase traffic We feel that Mr. Brown's statement in his appeal, about the traffic is contradictory, as multi-family housing would further consest the area with more vehicles. We also feel it is pre- mature in view of current uncertainty about the Sunset Iighway widening and access from same. We feel tnat a precedent has already been established with an R-2 zoning on a portion of the vroperty in question, aoproximately ten months aro. We further maintain that, in view of exist family residences, the Re3 high- density zoning is i Respectfully submitted, “2 é “c lll Sigg hin #2 6 2. AY S77 A. CH / (nigh: hts #3 O A at wet Obese d Linbge $208 (eer Vathleer) C Ottemkep) 320% a** Ave.N. pare ¢ or 2 Dhue L, Babtun [316 1 At fPantne aur Ty (b abiex” [S/o A Parlor Mra. Wap 8 O. hwwey — (818 yp Lh pute We Tha tina! GD dre! 13/8 74 ST Klewron fbn Walher, 228, IU. Sp Renter, , 4422 SF? ae, Jil We Sb. eile yaro Yy SC Geile SEZ Ter Aereyow" {222 772. Sf /aoe 3 Rd JpoT MM 2e fesse a7 >. ST. Tle fe Avilla, dt S207 - PV SP KEK 3 1 ae I po / Nowecn (mle [204 [Lt fer4s elites taay Mm dh. (anbn sala Ltda tber) 28 I Se, Reg Lire sX/- oy ae a Ko Yan ddd i2OT Mot 2 Rents ye ee ee OA ; a file Renton Planning Commission Meeting March 27, 1968 Minutes Page 4 ACTION: Moved by Racanello, seconded by Ross, that the Planning Commission approve the final plat of Victoria Park No. 3 and forward this recommendation to the City Council. Teegarden stated he felt the developer should request .a variance from the cul-de-sac requirements of the Platting Ordinance as the entire plat constitutes a cul-de-sac with the single access. The Planning Director stated it was his opinion a variance was not re- quired as this plat is a portion of the over-all development and quoted from Section 9-103 of the Subdivision Ordinance which states, "A final plat may be presented for final approval for any portion of a large subdivision when the proposed plat therefor has previously received tentative approval by the City Council provided dedicated access is furnished". When the over-all development is completed, the loop drive will no longer constitute a cul-de-sac as other access will be provided. The pending motion to approve the final plat carried; Stredicke dissenting. REZONE APPLICATIONS o*- (d) BROWN, RAY et al, Appl. No. R-446-68, rezone from R-2 and GS-1 to R-3; property located north of 12th Ave. N. between i25th Ave. S.E. and Sunset Blvd. The application was described by the Chairman and the Planning Director pointed out the location of the property on the zoning map and described surrounding uses. He stated the area is devel- oped at the present time for single family residential use. Slides of the property were shown. The Chairman read a letter received in opposition to the rezone re- quest signed by 29 residents of the area including a note attached which stated that these signatures represent all the property owners on the block's north side (across from the rezone request) plus two on the.same side of the street as the subject property. The Planning Director stated the applicant had submitted a proposed development plan showing 74 units with 109 parking spaces. He stated further.that the northerly portion of the property was rezoned to R-2 by the Planning Commission approximately nine months ago. Discussion followed concerning the number of units that could be built on a property of this size under its present zoning, under R-2 and under’ R-3. It was noted that several property owners are involved in this application. The Planning Director stated further that the widening of Sunset Highway. is. now in process by the State Highway Department. Pre- liminary surveys have been completed by the Highway Department. Acquisition of additional right of way will be started in the fall of 1968 with bids for construction being let during fall of 1969. The widening will have some effect on the property in question as some additional right of way may be acquired; however, the State Highway Department is not willing to commit itself on this at the present tite. Comments from the audience were invited. Mr. Eugene Methven, 1234 M Street, spoke in.opposition to the proposed rezone. He stated he opposed the Ray Beach rezone (property involved in this action which is now zoned R-2) and his reasons of increased Renton Planning Commission Meeting March 27, 1968 Minutes Page 5 traffic, loss of privacy, loss of view, plus possible increase in taxes apply as well in this case. Mr. and Mrs. George Johnson of 1222 M Street, Mr. Dennis Vadney of 1210 M Street, Mr. Chester Baze of 1216 M Street, Mr. and Mrs. John Walker of 1228 M Street all spoke in opposition to the proposed rezone citing the same reasons as Mr. Methven (first speaker). Mr. Ray Brown, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the rezone request. Upon inquiry by the Commission, he stated that he did not intend to develop the property himself; that the property owners' plans were indefinite in this réspect. The R-2 zone and the intent and purpose of the special permit allow- ing apartments in R-2 zone were explained to members of the audience by the Chairman. Ross asked the applicant if he would be willing to accept R-2 zoning on the property. Mr. Brown replied he was hoping to get R-3 zoning so that the property could be utilized to its fullest extent. Mr. Brown stated that the widening of Sunset Highway would take care of any additional traffic generated by an apartment development on the property. As there were no further comments, it was moved by Sterling, seconded by Denzer, that the hearing be closed. Motion carried unanimously. ACTION: Sterling stated he would move at this time that the application of Ray Brown et al for R-3 zoning be denied for the following reasons: 1. The proposed apartment development in this area is premature; the widening of Sunset Highway being a contributing factor; 2. The rezone request is incompatible with the surround- ing area which is single family residential; 3. The increase in traffic as a result of apartment development would have detrimental effects on the single family area; 4, The considerable interest and objections to the rezone as expressed by the presence of residents in the neighborhood at this hearing. Stredicke seconded this motion. On the motion, roll call vote was requested, with Commissioners voting as follows: Denzer - no Ross - aye Forgaard - no Sterling - aye Mola - aye Stredicke - aye Racanello - no Teegarden - aye Motion carried; rezone application denied. FURTHER ACTION: Moved by Stredicke, seconded by Sterling, that the Planning Commis- sion recommend to the City Council that the highest use of the subject property would be R-2 on that portion now zoned R-2 and R-1l on that portion of the property now zoned GS-1. The motion lost. Renton Planning Commission Meeting March 27, 1968 Minutes Page 6 Moved by Racanello, seconded by Ross, that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that the highest and best use of the subject property be R-2. Motion carried; Stredicke and Sterling dissenting. The Chairman advised the applicant of his right to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council in writing within ten days. The meeting was recessed at 10:15 P.M. The Chairman reconvened the meeting at 10:25 P.M. On roll call, all members responded present. (e) RICHARDS, EUGENE M., Appl. No. R-449-68, rezone from G-6000 to L-l; property located on 86th Ave. S. between S. 153rd St. and FAI 405. The Chairman described the rezone application. The Planning Director stated this is the parcel of land that was in the center of the pre- vious rezone request approved by the Commission. Slides of the prop- erty were shown. The applicant has been contacted but has not been in touch with the Planning Department office up to this time. The Planning Director stated he believed the applicant was out of town on vacation. ACTION: Moved by Stredicke, seconded by Racanello, that the application be continued for 30 days. Motion carried; Denzer dissenting. (£) HAWK, JAMES, Appl. No. R-451-68, rezone from G to H-1; property located east side of 8/th Ave, S. between S. 158th and 160th Sts. The Chairman described the rezone application; the Planning Director pointed out location of the property on the zoning map. Slides of subject property were shown. The Planning Director stated that while the Comprehensive Plan indicates non-manufacturing use for this area, the applicant has requested H-1l zoning which would allow the fuel oil storage use he requires, which is a non-manufacturing use. The Chairman stated he understood the applicant's representative had a revised plan to present to the Commission and called for comments from the audience. Mr. Walter Isaac, planning consultant from Seattle, speaking on be- half of the applicant, gave a presentation of the development plans for the fuel oil storage complex. Upon inquiry by the Commission, he stated his client would accept M-P zoning if he could be assured the desired use would be allowed in such zone. Teegarden stated he felt it was the opinion of the Commission that this development would be a good and acceptable use for this particular area, but felt this question should be settled before the hearing was closed. The Planning Director stated the proposed development, in his opinion, was in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and would be allowable in this particular location under M-P zoning if approved by the Planning Commission. Moved by Denzer, seconded by Forgaard, that the hearing be closed. Motion carried unanimously. ACTION: Moved by Stredicke, seconded by Denzer, that the Planning Commission approve the application of James Hawk for M-P zoning (amended from H-1) and forward to the City Council for approval as it complies with the Comprehensive Plan. Motion carried unanimously. OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK +» RENTON, WASHINGTON CITY HALL, CEDAR RIVER PARK, RENTON, WASHINGTON 96055 © ALPINE 5-3464 April 2, 1968 AMENDED ME Zc Re: Ray Brown Appesi ro WOO Ded Peat Ion, ox ra Dear Property Owner: The Renton City Gouncil, at its regular meeting of poeta ens has set /1968 at 8:00 p.m. in the Renton City Coun Chambers, as date for -eerteg—on the -aeeve=cepttonetiappeel. Reconsivening Rezewe RKequesr of MR BROWN , All interested persons are invited to be present and to be heard on the matter . ‘Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON KL brniad % Mehton’ Helmie W. Neison City Clerk HWN/sk April 2, 1968 Re: Ray Brown Appeal of Planning Commission Rezone Denial Dear Property Owner: The Renton City Council, at its regular meeting of April 1, 1968, has set April 15, 1968 at 8:00 p.m. in the Renton City Council Chambers, as date for hearing on the above-captioned appeal. All interested persons are invited to be present and to be heard on the matter . Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Helmie W. Nelson City Clerk HWN/sk er ie) O 8 2 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK +» RENTON, WASHINGTON iy al ‘3 CITY HALL, CEDAR RIVER PARK, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98058 © ALPINE 5-3464 %, ao Sh, 0, ‘ ®? capa? . April 2, 1968 Re: Ray Brown Appeal of Planning Commission Rezone Denial Dear Property Owner: The Renton City Council, at its regular meeting of April 1, 1968, has set April 15, 1968 at 8:00 p.m. in the Renton City Council Chambers, as date for hearing on the above-captioned appeal. All interested persons are invited to be present and to be heard on the matter . ‘Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON AL bonig) 4 Hektor Heimie W. Nelson City Clerk HWN/sk Ae 4/1/08 March 28, 19638 Renton City Council City Hall Renton, Washington re: Appeal fhkho»Planning Commission recommendation of R-2 zoning for property petitioned for R-3 under the name of Ray Brown Gentlemen: This appeal is presented to you for the reason that there exists many valid reasons for the change of this zoning to R-3. To start with, R-3 is in the comprehensive plan adopted by the City of Renton for this property. Further, on one side of all of this property would be business zoning, highway, or power line. The R-3 would serve as a good buffer to the single family dwellings in the area, Because of the high rate of traffic on the adjacent main highway, this property is not suitable for single family dwellings, and lends itself much more to the multiple dwelling. With the proximity to the shopping facilities, the heavy traffic pattern, and the general development in this area this property is highl suitable to R-3 zoning. And further, because of the high real estate taxes and land cost in this area, R-2 is not suitable, nor is it the highest and best use. Very truly yours, Apel, a \ub Ray meHan Rezone | v\ aa anaky res 4 t March lo, 1968 The undersiened residents (property owners denoted by oye ) object to the pnroposed rezoning from R-2 & GS-1 to ba R-3 of the followins croperty at the general location "North 7] of 12th Ave North between 125th Ave S.ii and Sunset Bivd." Lots 3 and.lL, Block 1, Shevard Heishts Addition, according to the plat recorded in Vol. lo of Plats, Page 79, Records of King County Washington; Together with 1 that vnortion of the SWe of the SI R.5E, W.M., lying Westerly of IM Street, Southe Wiehway and Northerly of said . i Sh Addi ALSO tocether n all that portion a ' . 1 1447 ¢ } 2+ of tue the Sit of said Sec. 4 described as point on tre east Line of said sub- division 326,30! northerly from the SE corner thereof; thence continuing northerly along said easterly line a distance of 103.00! to a point : 89.901 northerly of said SE corner: thence north 8805 post O8" West to the easterly marein of Puset Sound Li al follows: Beginning na Power and geht Conmoany'ts transrt clon line right of way; thence southerl] Lone said easterly a point bearing north Ag < om c ee oe . fis ‘i $5 ae 4-3 88083 108" West from the voint ne; thence south one) a) - bs a Bn SF apes > 4 3 Sm ce® iccon 389 5310% a Fast to tne point of GSinning. We request the above area remain as »vresenti» zoned. Name Aday Oded poe Via vy SROT-_M. SF aA Stor (22? fhe, PA a SAL. MSL ASAGG “7. rok ee L2BY~/T-ST. ([2Ab-M., Sr a L228 Pn dE i p32 7 St. _ 3208 12" Ave Mt Pa i a) eae ne ys Name % ‘<.. aa, ii | eben a Address >) ee. a" “ae i 128, Pde all 26 4 2 a A ve: Ne ll dt. enue, LA ASE. — £28. = eee (ne en Ld lo Pd)" dipueh i.) a . 2" Lg iis i fei? iio aa Lb /)G12 hes D322 th 15 LF 2 JA. i— AVE Lt SAI. Ce | 7A SE. Chee a A12ROt PA $b i LEAL 2 Lf - Lealin, ag /°d¢ yy 2) if, 7- Maer, $204~-N) ar Ke, he " AG OF iS fs MAR 20 } G APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE IN THE CITY OF RENTON FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Appl. No. (C- YU4b-L 9 Plan. Com. Action Venved 3-21-b% Receipt No. lol 37] Appeal Filed 3-2%-4% Filing Date A-4-bE City Council Action Hearing Date A 29-9 Ordinance No. §& Date APPLICANT TO ANSWER ALL THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS NEATLY AND ACCURATELY: o i“? i : g » Name 4 \ A-t pz Zt Ay Address S//3 Sunray TINA (i Aan (] Telephone No. Ki F- AAP §- Property petitioned for rezoning iS located On* -WlwGStr-G—buneet tiie away between @—#o— riers. and (he Luis SSCS EINES Ee ae heey Total square footage in property 96, 954 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY * Legal Description attached Existing Zoning R-2 & GS-1 Zoning Requested R-3 What are the uses you propose to develop on this property? Apartments Number of permanent off-street parking spaces that will be provided on property? 109 Number required 74 NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional infor- mation you desire to submit to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure sheet Item No. 2 for specific requirements). 1. In what way is this proposed change in zoning in the public interest? This zone change will help to consolidate a number of zoning boundaries and development. isd into a consolidated zone and due to the terrain will provide for the biggest and est use oi the property. 2. On what basis is there a real need in this community for more zoning of the type you request? The need is exhibited by the Apartment Occupancy within this area, the migration of people to this area, and the interest on the part of a reputable builder —___to develop apartments on this site. 3. What provision will you make to protect adjacent and surrounding properties from the detrimental effects of any uses permitted in the proposed zone? Due to t the property from 'M' St. down to Sunset Highw 3-story b can be constructed with a minimum of exposure to the dwelling units East of 'M' St, Ingress and egress can be controlled and ve icu ar manuvering accomplished on site. Landscaping and screen planting would be ae eS order to enhance its setting and blend with the adjoining properties. ety FEB 8 oe Renton Planning Dept. 1967 Renton Planning Commission Meeting March 13, 1968 Minutes Page 2 NEW BUSINESS The Planning Director stated that with the permission of the Chair- man he would review briefly the following items of new business. The Chairman indicated that these new items of business would be studied in detail by the Planning Commission on the field trip, the date of which would be set later during this meeting. SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION (a) GRIFFIN HOME FOR BOYS, proposed addition; property located at 10198 Lake Washington Blvd. Continuation of the development pre- viously reviewed by Planning Commission. FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (b) VICTORIA PARK NO. 3, Appl. No. FP-450-68; property located south of 14th Ave. S., north of S.E. l66th St. and east of Talbot Road (72 lots). REZONE APPLICATIONS (c) BROWN, RAY et al, Appl. No. R-446-68, rezone from R-2 and GS-1 S.E. and Sunset Blvd. | to R-3; property located north of Il2th Ave. N. between 125th Ave. (d) RICHARDS, EUGENE M., Appl. No. R-449-68, rezone from G-6000 to L-1l; property located on 86th Ave. S. between S. 153rd St. and FAT 405. (e) HAWK, JAMES, Appl. No. R-451-68, rezone from G to H-1; property located east side of 87th Ave. S. between S. 158th and 160th Sts. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS (a) FIELD TRIP. DATE ACTION: Moved by Ross, seconded by Forgaard, that the next field trip be conducted on Saturday, March 16, 1968; Commissioners to leave from the Park Avenue Restaurant at 8:00 A.M. Motion carried. (ob) PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MEETING, APRIL 5--6, 1968 Chairman Garrison announced that the spring meeting of the Planning Association of Washington would be held in Wenatchee on April 5 and 6. He asked if any members felt they would be able to attend. Denzer and Stredicke stated they wished to attend. The Chairman stated this was a very worthwhile meeting and urged a good attend- ance from the Planning Commission. ACTION: Moved by Teegarden, seconded by Ross, that James Denzer and Richard Stredicke be authorized to attend the PAW meeting in Wenatchee on April 5 and 6, 1968. The Planning Director stated that staff members will attend and that a car pool could be worked out. The pending motion carried unanimously. RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE MEETING MARCH 13, 1968 AGENODA ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES, MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1968 BUSINESS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS MEETING: FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (a) FINAL PLAT OF GLENCOE, Appl. No. FP-443-68; property located NE corner S.E. 107th St. and 132nd Ave. S. E. (continued from meeting of February 28, 1968) Total Aréa=--2&.7 ae. (115 Lots) Existing Zoning--G-7200 Existing Use--undeveloped Principal Access--132nd Ave. S.E. Proposed Use--single family residential Comprehensive Plan--single family residential NEW BUSINESS: SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION (a) GRIFFIN HOME FOR BOYS, proposed addition; property located at 10198 Lake Washington Blvd. Continuation of development previously reviewed by Planning Commission FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (b) VICTORIA PARK NO. 3, Appl. No. FP-450-68; property located south of 14th Ave. S. north of S.E. 166th St. and east of Talbot Rd. Total Area--20 ac. (72 lots) Existing Zoning--SR-1l Existing Use--undeveloped Principal Access--Talbot Rd. Proposed Use--single family residential Comprehensive Plan--single family residential REZONE APPLICATIONS (c) BROWN, RAY et al, Appl. No. R-446-68, rezone from R-2 and GS-1 to R-3; property located north of 12th Ave. N. between 125th Ave. S.E. and Sunset Blvd. Total Area--2.3 ac. Existing Zoning=—R-2 and GS=1 Existing Use--single family residential Principal Access--M St. Proposed Use--medium density multi-family residential Comprehensive Plan--low density multi-family residential (ad) RICHARDS, EUGENE M., Appl. No. R-449-68, rezone from G-6000 to L-1l; property located on 86th Ave. S. between S. 153rd St. and FAI 405 Total Area--6900 sq. ft. Existing Zoning--G-6000 Existing Use--single family residential Principal Access--86th Ave. S. Proposed Use--light industrial Comprehensive Plan--light industrial Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Shepard Heights Addition, according to the plat recorded in Vol. 46 of Plats, page 79, Records of King County, Washington: Together with all that portion of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 4, Twp 23N, R 5E, W.M., lying westerly of "M" St., southerly of Sunset Highway, and northerly of said Shepard Heights Addition: ALSO together with all that portion of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of said Sec. 4 described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of said subdivision 326.30' northerly from the SE corner thereof; thence continuing northerly along said easterly line a distance of 163.60' to a point 489.90' northerly of said SE corner; thence north 88°53'08" West to the easterly margin of Puget Sound Power & Light Company's transmission line right of way; thence southerly along said easterly margin to a point bearing north 88°53'08" West from the point of beginning; thence south 88°53'08" East to the point of beginning. LEGAL DESCRIPTION For Rezoning Purposes Lots 3 & 4 Block 1, Shepard Heights Addition recorded in Volume 46 _ of plats, page 79, King County, Washington plus that portion of Parcel A oo described below lying easterly of the Puget Sound Power and Light Compan R/W easement. 1/4, SE 1/4, SW 1/4, Section 4, T23.N, _ Parcel A. A part of the R5E, W.M.; King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the S 1/4 corner\of said Section 4; thence along the easterly line of said subdivision, N 1° 16' 12" E, 326. 30 feet to the point of beginning and proceeding thence N 88° 53.08" W, 258. 97 feet to the Southeasterly margin of the Sunset Highway; th ce along said Southeasterly of said subdivision; thence along the Easterly line of said subdivision S 1° 16' 12" W, 102.70 feet to the point of beginning and EXCEPT: Commend at the S 1/4 corner of said section 4; thence along the Easterly line of said subdivision N 1° 16' 12" E, 489. 90 feet to the point of beginning and proce thence N 88° 53' 08" W, 138 feet more or less to the South ster Page Two Legal Description Shepard Heights Addition Parcel A (continued) of Sunset Highway; thence along said Southeasterly margin N35°44'50"E, , 75 feet, more or less; thence S 88° 53' 08" E., 97 feet, more or less, to the Easterly line of said subdivision; thence along said Easterly line S 1° 16' 12" , 60 feet to the point of beginning, PLUS that portion of Lot 1, Block l, as deleted from the plat of ''Shepart Heights Addition" described as follows, Beginning at the S 1/4 corner of Section 4, T 23 N, R5E, W.M.; thence N1° 16' 12"'E., 701.60 feet to the Southerly margin of Sunset Highway; thence\N 35° 47' 12"'E., along said Southerly margin 10 feet; thence S 84° 02' 33" E. , 69. 06 feet to the true point of beginning, thence continuing S 84° 02' 33" B,, 74.75 feet to the Westerly margin of 'M' Place; thence Southerly along said Westerly margin of 'M' Place 70 feet; thence N 87° 59! 43''w.74. 50 feet; thenke N 1° 16' 12" E, 75.15 feet to the true point of beginning. C-2 - That portion of Lot 1, Block 1, as deleted \ from the plat of ''Shepard Heights Addition" described as follows: Beginning at the S 1/4 corner of Section 4, T 23 N, R 5 as W.M.; thence N 1° 16! 12! 701.60 feet to the Southerly margin of Sunset Highway and the true point of beginning; thence N 35° 47' 12" E along said Southerly margin 10 feet; thence S 84° 02' 33" E, 69. 06 feet; thence S 1° 16' 12" w, 75. 18 feet; thence N 87° 59' 43" W, 74.50 feet; thence N 1° 16' 12" E, 71. 60 feet to the true point of beginning. A - -That portion of Lot 1, Block 1, as deleted from the plat of ''Shepard Heights Addition" described as follows: Beginning at the S 1/4 : A Page Three Legal Description Shepard Heights Addition corner of Section 4, T23N, R5E, W.M.; thence N 1° 16' 12". E, 701.60 : to an intersection with the Southeasterly margin of Sunset Highway; thence said margin N 35° 47' 12" E, 90 feet to the true point of beginning; thence, continuing along said margin N 35° 47' 12" E, 27. 13 feet to a point of curve; thence along the ate of a curve to the right, having a radius of 543. 69 feet, ' an arc distance of 102.36 feet to a point of compound curve; thence, along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 10 feet, an arc distance of 23.51 feet to the West margin‘of 'M' Place; thence along said margin S 1° 16' 12" w, 121, 32 feet; thente N 72° 57' 42" W, 101. 82 feet to the true . point of beginning. B - - That portion of Lot 1, Block 1, as deleted from the : plat of ''Shepard Heights Addition" descrited as follows: Beginning at the S 1/4 corner of Section 4, T23N, R5E, WOM thence N 1° 16' 12" E, % 701.60 feet to an intersection with the Southeasté rly margin of Sunset Highv thence along the said margin N 35° 47' 12" E, 10 fe t to the true point of beginning; thence along said margin N 35° 47' 12" E, FY feet; thence S 72° 57! 42" E, 101. 82 feet to the West margin of 'M' Pla 2; thence along \ said margin S 1° 16' 12" W, 50 feet; thence N 84° 02! 33" w, 143, 81 feet to the true point of beginning; PLUS the N 150 feet of the S 630 feet Sighs W 149 feet of SW 1/4 of SE 1/4, Section 4, T23N, R5E, W.M., " County, Washington. AFFIDAVIT I, bh) LL. SLABS sth. being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this “/ lp day 07 Loree 196 FS Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Ly, GE. ae ae A HEE ee. (Zz ~ (Signature of Owner) OCB Fag Leotee Cte JAS Lh i. ~ (Mailing Rddress) er el oP } SV 0 RAN 3 y AF a0 UCiy ms a lA 7 Le IF, 4 abe LL MEZD CZ fe ee ass iN (City) *— (State) “4 Z teeee %, D ps fl g (OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION the foregoing application has been inspected by *R thorough and complete in every particular S$ 20d regulations of the Renton Planning Department gov sings Rieres of such application. FEB 8 196 This is to certify th 19 BY: ia Renton Planning Dept. Rev. March 1967 AFFIDAVIT -) 4 I, A \ad Drow (Ver being duly sworn, declare that I am the” sanee Te the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 774 day of Zo Aeua Ru 1965, Notary Public in and for the State a of WaBnengeeta residing ate AL he LA ZZ Ms Fkee ZL ( i Ot ad b AVN \ (Name) (Signature of Owner) 2 dee (2¢ hea tirte € S/13 Sermael Blot Oe 2/ wile ft SP x ed La C2 a 3 VAL, ut} € 3 (Address) (Mailing Address) : “ “he, di “Orne fe <7 VA aon iNan baa H1 UBLig wi5.: (City) (State) P - 4 es ole Gg sd WASY ae b — 225, (ia (Telephone) (OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION the foregoing application has been inspected by ~thorough and complete in every particular S@nd regulations of the Renton Planning of such application. This is to certify th me and has been f and to conform Department gov 1968 19 BY: Wh FEB 8 Date received Renton Planning Dept. Rev. March 1967 AFFIDAVIT Way Mo ND Fo ABEACH being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this & day of ZL mp Lo a Notary Public in and for the e of residing at WILPTA rb Ae eb Sage totd £ Mets Le Name) ft \ 1" Geignature of Owner) 2 Ob /- bd , JOSS M-_ SF. (Mailing Address) F ay A Ais " Wik AL tty AY Zi: PE ETO AD LA Paw tif EG DLL AA LAG S71 DBL ZETA ‘athied A Mill Atos Alii « a . thy. Henke Warde» we, (City) (State) zu 7 (OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that me foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been e thorough and complete in every particular and to conform oo theft and regulations of the Renton Planning Department g nes spans ON ing of such application. Date receiv , 19 BY: \\, Renton Planning Dept. Rev. March 1967 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON MARCH 27 , 19 68 , AT 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: S Brown . REZONE FROM R-2 &-GS-1 TO R-3; property lying north of 12th Ave. N. between ]}5¢h-Aves-S=E. & Sunset Blvd. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Shepard Heights Addition, according to the plat recorded in Vol. 46 of Plats, page 79, Records of King County, Washington: Together with all that portion of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 4, Twp 23N, -R 5E, W.M., lying westerly of "M" St., southerly of Sunset Highway, and northerly of said Shepard Heights Addition: ALSO together with all that portion of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of said Sec. 4 described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of said subdivision 326.30' northerly from the SE corner thereof; thence continuing northerly along said easterly line a distance of 163.60' to a point 489.90! northerly of said SE corner; thence north 88°53'08" West to the easterly margin of Puget Sound Power & Light Company's transmission line right of way; thence southerly along said easterly margin to a point bearing north 88°53'08" West from the point of beginning; thence south 88°53'08" East to the point of beginning. 2. REZONH FROM G-6009 “WO Lei: property located on 35th Ave. S. between §..153rd St. and FAI 405. LEGAL DESCRIPYION: That portion of Lots 34 & 35, Block 30, C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Add'n to City of Seattle, Div. No. 1, as per plat recorded in Vol. 17 of Plats, page 74, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the SE corner of said Lot 34 and running thence west along the south line of lot 34, a distance of 115'; thence north parallel to the east lines of said Lots 34 & 35 a distance of 60'; thence east parallel to the south line of said Lot 35 a distance of 115' to the east line of said Lot 35; thence south along the east lines of said Lots 34 & 35 a distance of 60' to the place of beginning, 3. REZONE FROM G TO H-1; property located east side of 87th Ave. S. between S. 158th & 160th Sts. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: Lots 1,2, 3, 4,5, 6, 7, 22, 23, 24,25, 26, 27, and 26 in Block 2 OF C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division No. 1, as per plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, on page 74, records of King County; PARCEL B: Lots 27 and 28 in Block 1 of C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division No. 1, as per plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, on page 74, records of King County; AND Lots 8, 9, 10, ii, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 in Block 2 of C.0, Hillme nis Earitqaion Gar den Addition to the City ‘of Seattle Division No. ~ J, as per plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, on page 74, records of King County; PARCEL C: Lots 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, Le, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28 in Block 3 of C.D. Hillman’ S Bae ington Gar Hen Addition to thie City of Seattle, Division No. 1, as per plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, on page 74 #, recot “ds of King County; ALL situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON MARCH 27, 1968 AT 8:00 P.M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO SAME. JAMES E. DENZER ,SECRETARY PUBLISHED March 17, 1968 RENTON PLANNING CCMMISSION CERTIFICATION ly James L. Magstadt _, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ) _ / = ATTEST:; Subscribed and sworn SIGNED LE: Y7: Levis ad to before Ney a porary Public, ; : 1968 . fv iy -_ Y we TL ead we Ci Y Z. fo) extKGh = Pig? ff 7 SE