Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-06-009 (1 of 2)_MiscCHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #3400, SEAITLE, WA 98104 Order No.: 001175414 Your No.: SHY CREEK PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON DEVELOPMENT P!,ANN CITY OF RENTON ING TRIAD ASSOCIATES 12112 115TH AVENUE N.E. KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 JAN 272006 RECEIVED AITN: STEPHANIE GODBY 1/1 Enclosed are your materials on the above transaction. If you have any questions regarding these materials, please contact us. Thank you for tbis opportunity to serve you. ««««««««««««««««««<»»»»»»»»>»»»»»»»»»»> UNIT 10 • YOUR COMPLEIE BUILDER/DEVELOPERSERVICE CENTER WE HAVE EXPANDED TO SERVE ALL YOUR TITLE INSURANCE NEEDS RELATED TO LAND ACQUISmON, DEVELOPMENT F1NANONG AND PROPERTY SUBDNlSION. MIKE HARRIS TITLE OFFICER (206) 628·5623 (E-MAIL MICHAELHARRlS@CTTCOM) KEITH EISENBREY TITLE OFFICER (206) 628-8377 (E-MAIL: KEITH.EISENBREY@CTT.COM) STEVE KINSELLA CONDO COORDINATOR (206) 628-5614 (E-MAIL: STEVE.KINSELLA@CTT.COM) BOB BLOEDEL SENIOR TITLE EXAMINER FAX NUMBER: (206) 628-5657 ««««««««««««««««««<»»»»»»»»>»»»»»»»»»»> NEW ADDRESS ALERT: CHICAGO TITLE has moved its Seattle office from the 18th to the 34th floor of the Bank of America Tower. Effective January 20, 2004, our new address is: 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3400 Seattle, WA 98104 Our phone and fax numbers are still the same, but please note that our e·mail addresses have changed, as shown above. TITl.ET8/RDA/(ff}9 R CHICAGO TITLb INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFfH AVENUE, #3400, SEATILE, WA 98104 PHONE: (206)628-5623 FAX: (206)628-5657 ORDER NO: YOUR NO: UNIT NO: LOAN NO: 001175414 SHY CREEK 10 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT o R D E R SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER, SELLER, PURCHASER/BORROWER, PROPERTY ADDRESS: REF ERE NeE I N FOR MAT ION 1 CONNER HOMES COMPANY" AND JOSEPH ALAIN SMITH, AND HENRY B. KAMPHAUS AND DIANE L. KAMPHAUS WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 09/15/05 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as follows: s THE VESTING IN PARAGRAPH THREE OF SCHEDULE A OF OUR COMMITMENT IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: CONNER HOMES COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, AS TO PARCELS A AND B; JOSEPH ALAIN SMITH, AS HIS SEPARATE ESTATE, AS TO PARCEL C; AND HENRY B. KAMPHAUS AND DIANE L. KAMPHAUS, HUSBAND AND WI FE, AS TO PARCEL D. T PARAGRAPH NUMBER(S) 4, 6 AND 7 HAS (HAVE) BEEN AMENDED AS FOLLOWS, u PARAGRAPH NUMBER 4: AD 1. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) , YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER, LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND, ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS, GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: 2006 084710-0108-06 4342 $ 207,000.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ NOT AVAILABLE PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ NOT AVAILABLE SEE NEXT PAGE SUPPLCOM/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AFFECTS, PARCEL A Order No.: Your No.: Unit No.: SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT (Continued) 1175414 SHY CREEK 10 NOTE, TAXES FOR 2005 IN THE SUM OF $ 2,507.56 HAVE BEEN PAID. v PARAGRAPH NUMBER 6, AS 2. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES), YEAR, TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER, LEVY CODE, ASSESSED VALUE-LAND, ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS, GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES, AFFECTS, PARCEL C 2006 084710-0115-07 4342 $ 481,000.00 $ 554,000.00 BILLED, $ NOT AVAILABLE PAID, $ 0.00 UNPAID, $ NOT AVAILABLE NOTE, TAXES FOR 2006 IN THE SUM OF $ 12,413.20 HAVE BEEN PAID. " PARAGRAPH NUMBER 7, AT 3. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) , YEAR, TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER, LEVY CODE, ASSESSED VALUE-LAND, ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS, GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES, AFFECTS, PARCEL D 2006 084710-0140-06 4342 $ 294,000.00 $ 147,000.00 BILLED, $ NOT AVAILABLE PAID, $ 0.00 UNPAID, $ NOT AVAILABLE NOTE, TAXES FOR 2006 IN THE SUM OF $ 5,348.01 HAVE BEEN PAID. SUPLCOM2!RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: Your No.: Unit No.: SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT (Continued) 1175414 SHY CREEK 10 x THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH(S) HAS (HAVE) BEEN ADDED TO OUR COMMITMENT: y PARAGRAPH NUMBER 12: z 4. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL B 2006 084710-0107-07 4342 $ 30,000.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ NOT AVAILABLE PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ NOT AVAILABLE THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THIS COMMITMENT SINCE SEPTEMBER 15, 2005, EXCEPT THE MATTERS NOTED HEREINABOVE. JANUARY 5, 2006 AUTHORIZED BY: MIKE HARRIS AC NOTE: THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT: TRIAD ASSOCIATES STEPHANIE GODBY CONNER HOMES COMPANY JOHN SKOCHDOPOLE 1/1 1/1 SUPLCOM2/RDA/0999 WHEN RECORDED JUmJRN TO CONNER HOMBS COMPANY 846 1081H AVE NE BElLEVUE WA 98004 20051031001584.001 E2165873 Ital~II:32 Kt~ , '*' ~ .aR ... ....... PACiUlJi OF Nt IQ\ _C_H_lCA_G_O_TI_TIE __ IN_S_U_RAN __ CE_CO_M_P_AN_Y ____ _ ~ 1152293 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Dated: OCTOBER 7, 200S THE GRANTOR CARY C HAS11NGS AND ruDY H. HASTINGS, HUSBAND AND WIPE for and in consideration of TI!N' DOUARS AND OTIIER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERA110N AND AS PART OF AN I.R.C SECJ10N 1031 TAX DBfBRREO EXCHANGE in hand paid, con~ and warrants 10 CONNER HOMES COMPANY, A WASHINGfON CORPORA.TION the fo11ewing described real esta.te sihlated in the County of To: Account Nurnber(s): 08471().()l{)8-lJ6 CHICAGO lTTIf INS. CO@ REF# //J.l.J 2.1-/0 State of Washington: TRACT 25, BLACK LOAM FIVB ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT TIfBRBOF', RBCORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE; 101, IN KING COUNT'{, NASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCBL; BEGINNING AT niE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 2S; THENCE SOUTHERLY AWNG THE NEST LINB OF 1HTH AVENUE SournRAST. TO TH..B SOUTHRAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 25; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOOTH LINB OF SAID TRACT A DISTANCE OF 207.00 FEBT; THENCE NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE NBST LINE OP 144TH AVENUE SOtmiBAST, TO A POINT LYING 140.00 FEBT SOUTH OF THB NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 25; THENCB WESTERLY ALONG A LINB PARALLEL TO I'HE NORm LINB OF TRACI' 25 A DISTANCE OF 48.00 FEBT; THENCE NORTHERLY AND PARALLKL TO THE WEST LINE OF 144TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST, A DISTANCE OF 140.00 FEET TO THB NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 25; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THB POINT OF BEGINNING. SEa ATTACHED DESCRIPTION 52:(;£U'~ r:JY INGS ~RDA/0!99 OIICAGO TI'fLE INSURANCE COMPANY &crow No; 1152293 EXlDBITA. Title No.: 1152293 (ALSO KNOWN AS A PORTION OF KING COUNTY LOT LINE ADJUS'IMENT NUMBSR S90MOOaa, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9804090613.) 20051031001584.002 SUBJECT TO: EXCEPTIONS SET FORTH ON A'I"l'ACHBD EXHIBIT nA· AND BY THIS REPERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF AS IF FULLY INCORPORJU'EI) HERBIN. =/,da/0899 , ! STATB OF WASHINGTON COONTY OF KING 20051031001~ SS OR TIUS aV-nt DAY OF OCI'OBRR, 2005, BEFORE MR, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY Pl.lBLIC IN AND FOR TIlE STATE OF WASHINGTON. DULY CCJ<MISSIOIIBD AND SWORN. PERSONALLY APPEARBD GARy C. HASTINGS AND JUDy H. HASTINGS KNOWN TO Ml! TO BE THB INDIVIDUAL IS) DBSCRIBBD IN AND lOll{) BXBCDTBO THE HITHIN INSTROMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGBD THAT THEY SIGNED AND SBAL:80 THE SAMB AS THBIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ~ AND DRBD, FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES HERBIN MBNTIOIIBD. NOTARy S IGNATORR CHICAGO 1TfLBINSURANCI! COMPANY EXHIBIT A Escrow No.: 1152293 RBSBRVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN DBED FRCM NOR'l'HSRN PACIFIC RAILROAD CCMPARY: 20051031001584.004 RBSBRVING .AND 8XCBPTING PRCM SAID LANDS SO MUCH OR SUCH PORTIONS THBREOF AS ARB OR MAY B8 MINBI\AL LANDS OR COOlTAIN COAL OR IROII, AND ALSO TIlE USB AND THB RIGHT AND TITLE TO THE USB OP StJeH SURPACB: GROUND AS MAY BB NECESSARY FOR GROUND OPERATIONS AND THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO SUCH R!SERVBD AND EXCEPTED MINERAL LANDS. INCLUDING LANDS CONTAINING COAL OR IRON r FOR TIm PURPOSE OF BXPLORING, DBVBLQPING AND HORKING THE 511MB. RECORDING NUMBER: 79509 CQVEt1ANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, BASEMENTS, Nargs, DBDICATIONS AND SETBACKS I IF ANY. SET PORTH IN OR DELINEATED CW THE BOUNDARY /rm LINE ADJUS'IMENT RECORDED ONDER RECORDING NUMBER 9801090613. CITY OF RBNT(IrI, KASHINGTON ORDINANCB NO. 4612 • INCLODING TIiB TERMS AND PROVISIONS THBRBOP: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: J1JNB 21. 1996 9606210966 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFrH AVENUE, #3400, SEA TILE, WA 98104 Order No.: 001175414 Your No.: SHY CREEK TRIAD ASSOClA TES 12112 115TH A VENUE N.B. KlRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 ATIN: STEPHANIE GODBY PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON 1/1 Enclosed are your materials on the above transaction. If you have any questions regarding these materials, please contact us. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you. ««««««««««««««««««<»»»»»»»»>»»»»»»»»»»> UNIT 10 -YOUR COMPLETE BUILDER/DEVELOPER SERVICE CENI'ER WE IIA VE EXPANDED TO SERVE ALL YOUR TITI.E INSURANCE NEEDS RELATED TO LAND ACQUISmON, DEVELOPMENI FINANCING AND PROPERTY SUBDIVISION. MIKE HARRIS TITI.E OFFICER (206) 628-5623 (E-MAIL MICIIAELHARRlS@C1TCO~I) KEI1H EISENBREY Tn'Ll' OFFICER (206) 628-8377 (E-MAIL KEITH.EISENBREY@CIT.CoM) STEVE KINSELLA CONDO COORDINATOR (206) 628-5614 (E-MAIL ,rEVEKlNSELLA@C1TCOM) BOB BLOEDEL SENIOR TITLE EXAMINER FAX NUMBER (2'~,) 628-5657 ««««««««««««««««««<»»»»»»»»>»»»»»»»»»»> NEW ADDRESS ALERT: CHICAGO TITLE has moved its Seattle office from the 18th to the 34th floor of the Bank of America Tower. Effective January 2U, 2U04, our new address is: 701 Fifth AVCflue, Suite 3400 Seattle, W A 98104 Our phone amI fax numbers are still the same, but pleas" note that our e-mail addresses have changed, as shown above. TITIJ,n/RDAiW99 , " TAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY '". rlFrH AVENUE, #3400, SEATILE, WA 981(» PLAT CERTIFICATE Order No.: 1175414 Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat: In the matter of the plat submitted for our approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said KING County, to-wit: SEE SCHEDULE A (NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: GARY C. HASTINGS AND JUDy H. HASTINGS, HUSBAND AND WIFE,-AS TO PARCEL Ai CONNER HOMES COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, AS TO PARCEL B; JOSEPH ALAIN SMITH, AS HIS SEPARATE ESTATE, AS TO PARCEL C; AND HENRY B. KAMPHAUS AND DIANE L. KAMPHAUS, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS TO PARCEL D. EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED CHARGE: $200.00 TAX: $17.60 Records examined to SEPTEMBER 15, 2005 at 8,00 AM By HARRIS/EISENBREY Title Officer (206) 628-5623 rLATCRTA/RDA/~ PARCEL A, 'HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAr PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION Order No,: 1175414 TRACT 25, BLACK LOAM FIVE ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 101, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL, BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 25; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF 144TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 25; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT A DISTANCE OF 207_00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF 144TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST, TO A POINT LYING 140_00 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRAC~ 25; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT-25 A DISTANCE OF 48,00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF 144TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST, A DISTANCE OF 140,00 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 25; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING_ (ALSO KNOWN AS A PORTION OF KING COUNTY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER S90M0088, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9804090613_) PARCEL B, PARCEL C OF KING COUNTY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER S90M0088 AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9804090613, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; BEING A PORTION OF TRACT 25, BLACK LOAM FIVE ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 12, OF PLATS, PAGE 101, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PARCEL C, TRACTS 28 AND 29, BLACK LOAM FIVE ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 101, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PARCEL D, TRACT 32, BLACK LOAM FIVE ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT ~HEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 101, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PlATCRTLjRDA/fTm .. - CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULEB Order No.: 1175414 This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, flfst appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroacltrnents, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any other maUers wruch would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien, or right to lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, aU as imposed by law, and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable; mailers relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding or in the same becoming a lien. I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights, claims, or title to water. K. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). Pl..ATCRTB/RDA/0995l ., ... ~ 'HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPM PlAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order Nn.: 1175414 EXCEPTIONS A 1. RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY: RESERVING AND EXCEPTING FROM SAID LANDS SO MUCH OR SUCH PORTIONS THEREOF AS ARE OR MAY BE MINERAL LANDS OR CONTAIN COAL OR IRON, AND ALSO THE USE AND THE RIGHT AND TITLE TO THE USE OF SUCH SURFACE GROUND AS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR GROUND OPERATIONS AND THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO SUCH RESERVED AND EXCEPTED MINERAL LANDS, INCLUDING LANDS CONTAINING COAL OR IRON, FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPLORING, DEVELOPING AND WORKING THE SAME. RECORDING NUMBER: 79509 B 2. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: REGARDING: c AFFECTS: PARCEL C. AUGUST 19, 1999 19990819001587 SENSITIVE AREA NOTICE D 3. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF NOTICE OF CHARGES BY WATER, SEWER, AND/OR STORM AND SURFACE WATER UTILITIES, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9606210966. B 4. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL A. 2005 084710-0108-06 4342 $ 200,000.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ 2,507.56 PAID: $ 2,507.56 UNPAID: $ 0.00 PLATCRTBI/RDAjlR99 'HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA]' PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1175414 F 5. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL B. 2005 084710-0107-07 4342 $ 30,000.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ 381.62 PAID: $ 190.81 UNPAID: $ 190.81 G 6. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL C. 2005 084710-0115-07 4342 $ 465,000.00 $ 519,000.00 BILLED: $ PAID: $ UNPAID: $ 12/413.20 6,206.60 6,206.60 H 7. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER, LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL D. 2005 084710-0140-06 4342 $ 285,000.00 $ 134,000.00 BILLED: $ 5,348.01 PAID: $ 2,674.01 UNPAID: $ 2,674.00 PLo\. TCRB2/RDA/1J199 .... --.- 'HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPM PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1175414 I 8. MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8012039003, AND AFFIDAVIT OF CORRECTION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8109240792, AS FOLLOWS, 1.) LOCATION OF FENCE IN RELATION TO THE WEST LINE OF PARCELS A AND C, AND ANY ADVERSE RIGHTS STEMMING THEREFROM. 2.) LOCATION OF FENCE IN RELATION TO THE NORTH LINE OF PARCEL C AND THE SOUTH LINE OF PARCELS A AND B, AND ANY ADVERSE RIGHTS STEMMING THEREFROM. J 9. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, K GRANTOR, TRUSTEE, BENEFICIARY, AMOUNT, DATED, RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER, LOAN NUMBER, JOSEPH A. SMITH AND KATHY L. SMITH, HUSBAND AND WIFE PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY KEYSTONE MORTGAGE, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION $ 250,000.00 JUNE 16, 1997 JUNE 23, 1997 9706231064 1513155817 THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. ASSIGNMENT OF SAID DEED OF TRUST, DATED, RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER, ASSIGNEE, JUNE 23, 1997 JULY 29, 1997 9707290370 CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION L AFFECTS, PARCEL C. M 10. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, - GRANTOR, TRUSTEE, BENEFICIARY, AMOUNT, DATED, RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: DIANE L. KAMPHAUS AND HENRY B. KAMPSHAUS, WIFE AND HUSBAND FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO. WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB $ 247,500.00 APRIL 8, 2002 APRIL 12, 2002 20020412000727 PUr.TCRB2jRDA/0999 .. - LOAN NUMBER, 'HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA]' PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) 0017554031 Order No.: 1175414 THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. N 11. THB LBGAL DBSCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASBD ON INFORMATION PROVIDBD o WITH THB APPLICATION AND THB PUBLIC RBCORDS AS DBFINED IN THB POLICY TO ISSUE. THB PARTIBS TO THB FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THB TITLE INSURANCB COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THB DBSCRIPTION DOBS NOT CONFORM TO THEIR BXPECTATIONS. NOTE 1, THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 64.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT, PORS LOTS 25, 28, 29, AND 32, VOLUME 12 PLATS PG 101. AS OF SEPTEMBER 15, 2005, THE TAX ACCOUNTS FOR SAID PREMISES ARE 084710-0108-06, 084710-0107-07, 084710-0115-07, 084710-0140-06. END OF SCHEDULB B PIA TCRB2!RDAj0999 ..... - 'HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA!' PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1175414 o THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COpy OF THIS COMMITMENT: TRIAD ASSOCIATES STEPHANIE GODBY CONNER HOMES COMPANY JOHN SKOCHDOPOLE 1/1 1/1 PLATCRB2/RDA!0999 , CHICAGO TIn. .NSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH A VENUE, #3400, SEAlTLE, WA 98104 PHONE: (206)628-5623 FAX: (206)628-5657 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. MAP RDA 0999 ..... , IHIS sPACf PRCMOE [) fOIl FlECOADEItS USE ~.~< FIRST" . n' . FW~ ,,;;#rst Amencan TItle -.;-Insurance Company FiW r. Record .t Reqlllll 01 APTER r.>::CORDING L __ ~ ,0 NIWI Mseph ,b1 n srUh Adct.rn. % Sit &' Box 24m Cil),'" Slft& Seattle, WA 98124 g~==-=========.~~=·=~~=~·-=~~~-~-"~==~_J:~""'"=-,,,f$F~=-t. "'"_ ~~ ~ Statutory Warranty Deed 13 ... g ~ THBGRANTOR Shirley L. Shook. as Iw!r separate !!State ~ for ..... «,midel1lticJP 01 Ten oollus and other valuable CCC\Sideration ~ in bIDd,.d. CODYlt1SMd 'llrWTUllllIi to Joseph AlaiA SIlith and Kathy L. s.it.h. .. -,-, ~ "" husband and vi fe G the (~delcriIxd rHI .. tate, situolcd ia the-Co.Iy of )(lH; • Sill" or W.J»ntl-= r" Tnct.s 28 aM 29 or Bladt to. Five k:re 'tracts. ac:cocding to the plat thereof rec:orded in a vol.-12 of Phts, Page 10L records of nng Qll.I'Ity, Hasblnc;toni \T .3 Situate in the CoYnt.yof King. State ot WlShingtal . . --- COUHn OF KlMi Shirl", I S"1Oot Ia_~,o b. UM I.dhiolliM(oIM..-rittt-d In.i>d .. ~ u~ 1M within Md ""'pine iMt"",pnl . .,... .~t4 lb., she .jp.t" IJw _m~ .. her 1,.,..cI ... ~.(t..,d!Jt,d. f .. U. _ ... ,d PWPO ... tlMR'III Dul[DMd. Dffirhll .ul \~i~ -+-'!-~'l" ~~>g.,--" ~ expire. 6/19/92 LPa.IOllIB4) ('OIJ:\T\" OF __ . 5.00 2.00 110640 R ...... 7 .. 00 55 on.lIi. _.I.~,"_. I~ .. _. __ 11.-(.,. _. lh.·,JPI .... ~.....a .• ~"I...,· "uhlir ill I"d It" ..... ..,;.~,~ t.r \\'~""i"lo'1"'" ,tilly w ..... In _ .... _I'.I .. \""'~ __________ J·,...."lrnl...d~ _____ SI't'''''t.,.,. . ~ • .-.tt""Iy.,04_._. ____ ._._ ..... ___________ _ th ..... liI ... lwllthoo! rl,,,,,I.d 11 .. , fo"'t:o>OnJ III'UII,"~rK.. DQd ,tdno .. lf'drrd 1111' .. itljp1.noo ", ... 111 to JIot \ht (m' '"""" ...... "w:r ... , ...... d.od '" ,~id c"rpt.r'Iiul'l. for Ihru.".rocIl'~""'_ ,,,,Ion OIth plOllr.! Ito.l 11It-,.;.J in.~ltvm.·", .... ll~llh ..... II/find i.I". fOf\IO>I" .... ,rnl.r,.i4 ., I I • ~ '1 0;: -, :\ First American Title Insurance Company Fill,d fur til"t'urd lit UC01IlU,q IIr Fi cst uerican Ti tl e Co. -i(inQ I ?OS34-' P.O. 80)( 1092 t'i'~' ,md ."'fllt' Renton. W;\ 99056 Escrow No. 9126)] IIIIS SPACE PAOVlOtD FOR JlECOAOlltS US( It) 5J ' P 6.-00 2.00 .......... ~OO Statutory Warranty Deed \) Ttlr: C;HA:\TOft SHIRLEY SIiOOK.. as her :sepante estah rIOl'"OIucJinnlll..;j("'r..li!>l\nf Ten Dollars and othn qood and valulble consideration.. ill h.md I'~id. '·I!I\\-I."Y~ ;In.1 w~rroliis 110 cARY C. HASrlftGS and JUDf ft. RASfJNGS, husband and wife L~9i111 description ()n alhckd E:rhlbit " 1\ II' athched hereto ~nd b,. tbis relerl!llce IDade a part bereof. SUBJECT TO nlE roLt.afINC ElCEPT101fS; A record of ,urvey recorded on December J. 1980. under t,cordinq '801103'00) ~nded by Affidavit of CorrectioD recorded SepteMber 24. 1'81 und., recordjn9 '8]09140791. :Jr,at\ .. -Octobet:: l~. __ .. -LJ..,_ ~/u~~ . hi r ley Shoo, ~ -- )-- Shitl~V Shook '" "'~ !<1I'.n" h' h.· ,I!., 1n111'·il"I~II·I.I.,~"h~~ , .... ",1 .. 1,., . ! ~ I 90 "01 \"n-,w _ 11"110., "I" "h·tI Ih. "','Nn ,,011 f"n'~"j~~ in.l~. ,111.1 p",1 .,.In'' .... I'''I~,"I1II1., h~r --------------- ,10.",,1_. -----.1:.1---- \ I -'-'-. o • ORDER 10. 190'34-4 !OIllI 110. 'UUl TIIB IARII REf BiUIiW oro IN TIllS COIIIXftIBII'l' IS Sl'nIlIftD III TIl!: GTM'B OF IIA8iUltGI,*, CO'/JIWf OF IOlrG AIID IS DI!SCIlUI!D AS FOLLOIIS: ~ PJlIlCIL or lCI\IG COIJlIrr 5IIOll'l' li'loIIT NO. 470' I APPIIIVB\) JIIIIII S, 1967, NfD ~ 0IfDD taIIC 0DIJ\I'1'r IUilClmDDIIJ RO. _'060508, AIID JlllVIsBD II'f tmfG CIlIIII'l'r 1#1 t.DII AllOW 1 ~ OF JDr.Y Z, 1990 _ J1IL'I 13, 19110, tJIIDIR !f0. &9_ 01' A POII'!~ OF ftIM:'1' 25, __ LOAII nw ACRI T'RICJ"S, ACCOROiJIGZ TO 'l'BB PLU' '1JUUd1OF Rlw ' we r. n vor.-13 OF PLMS, PIn 101, _ OF tmfG CIlIIII'l'r, 1lA88DiQ'1:iJ6, AIfD mllG IIDIU'! PIIlI'1'I<:OLARLY D~ AS FOLlAlIIS: ~ ALL 01' SAID TRACr Z 5, EXC!Pf TBB POLIDIfIlm I1BSCRUIID pAItC!:L= BEGIIRfDIQ NJ! TIIB iIOII'l'IIIIMT CORIII!R OF SAID TRACr ~5, T/fBIII:II 6<NtiiItJaJ _ ~ IIBII'l' LIIIE OF 144ft 111IJIIfDE SCiU'III8AIr.r, TO TIIB IOII'l'IIIWIT QlllIIEIt or SAID '!RACr 2', 'rlIIIIC8 Ifilll'!QL'l ArmIG TIll 80UTII LIIIE OF SJI%I) 'l'QC1' 207.00 PZft, TBIQICI: 1'C-""P"Y An PARALLBL WITH TIlE 1fES"l LDfZ OF 144ft AVII;IIIUE sOll'l'JdAsT. TO A POIII'1' LYIJIG 140.00 FBIIT SOUTH OF TIl!: IIORIII LIllI! OF SAID Tll&CT 251 TIIZIICI.: W2S1i£kL'l ALOIIG II LIIIt: PAlIALLEL TO TIlE !IORTH LINE OF ~ 25, 48.00 rBlfl TllDCZ lIOMujjlRt'l UD PII]I1d.IA TO THI! IfES'1' LIe OF 144T11 AVIIIOB SOO'l'IIJAs'r, 140.00 PBBT TO TIlE IfORTH LIIIE Of" SUD TMC'I' 25, TllBIIC!: EASn:RLY ALOtIG SAID 1f0Rl'll TO TIlE POIlIT OF BEGINllING. SITUATE Iif TIlE COIlH'lY OP KI"G. STATE of IIAS!!IIIGTOIf. End of Exhibj t "A" ..... .. I t •• ;' .'._--,-. --,~-~--~.-.-..----........... ---~~--------........ ". f.!~·IL~' "~:,,.,,:, "",,,,,,,,,m,'ll"' .. "', -,~j.-~,,'!!·-!l;~!!! •• "':"~'«!:';~-.!114!1!l!.'!!wlli, 'al!ll,ial-i! IIz_.".i!il:i::!IJJiii:IliiI'i::' i' "ii' '<i'I'+~i~:":~':~~"':;(.';;j'i~~f;;;;,:~L1;,',{!i;lL;ft~: o -111l1li1 D. lWII'Il&1JS and PIAIII L. IWIP\IAUG 20 50Uiii SARTA QUZ aVl, SUlT! 100 ~ 10 Civ!i8/1<ff<O-;'D :"''lIr,,- 146050AII RIfIc.:c •• " ....... ~ JI ct C I '(II' (1) --• C2I G II iii: (1) =: 1M .-. (2) ...... OeIut' (sUes" 1 .. A ."TaPIICIIIDI led HIM'.A ..... ~1IpI(oI ·-'-----1 ST4TUTORY WARRANTY DERD 1JII CUI'IDI Q. L .. <_'''nU .. or 1.a.C. c"" .... rn.ta to lollaoi ...... ri~ r •• 1 _ .. t .. : 01 _ :12 R __ ~ nn _ ,.",..,r ra ... 11"II:1II-_ n __ ,2 or n.nI ... 10', _ or OIl I Il1IIlft R ,. ~ or UIIII, saD. _1_. ~ 'III. _to. R .. trictM. ..... natloM ... ....ut_ of .-.., if ..". KAMERON C. CAYCE -PeA. t1 C , g .. II! .. = , .. ;: .. i / .. .. I .. .. I ~ .. ' ..... After Recording Return To: GailN. Wahrenberger Stokes Lawrence, P.S. 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4000 Seattle, W A 98104-3179 Document Title: Reference Number{s) of Documents Assigned or Released: Grantor{s): Grantee(s): Legal Description: Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number(s): 43212·1101 \ I 83888.doc E2136412 e7l.11Ut5 15;114 Kfl COIJITY'.~ ... SAlE $II." Quit Claim Deed 20060701001719.001 NGEttI 01' elll Additiorwl reference numbers on page __ of document. Kathy L. Smith 13415 144th Avenue SE Renton. W A 98059 Additional names on page __ of document. Joseph Alain Smith 2812 -70th Avenue East Fife. W A 98424 Additional names on page __ of documenr. Tracts 28 and 29 Black Loam five acre tracts; according to the plat thereof recorded on volume 12 of plats ... Complete legal tUscription is on page 2 of document. 0847100115 20050701001719.002 '- QUIT CLAIM DEED The undersigned Grantor, KATHY L. SMITH, for and in consideration of Decree of Dissolution, King County Cause No. oS~ronl'-r"NT , hereby conveys and quitclaims to the Grantee, JOSEPH ALAIN SMITH, the following described real property in King County including any interest therein which the Grantor may hereafter acquire: TRACTS 28 &29 BLACK LOAM FIVE ACRE TRACTS; ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED ON VOLUME 120FPLATS,PAGB 101, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; The Grantor expressly limits the covenants of this deed to those expressed herein and excludes all covenants arising Or to arise by statutory Or other implication. Dated this 'l~ day of January, 2005. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that KATHY L SMITH is the person who appeared before me and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. i;V Dated this l day of January. 2005. , WHBNRBCORDPDRETURNTO CONNER HOMES COMPANY ... IDmI A VENlJENB, SUlTB:zol BBU..EVUE. WASHlNGroN 98004 E2142699 ~"iJ" J8 ,JI:II:U ...... ' 0/1111 iQ\ _CHI_CA_G_O_TI_1LE __ I_N_SU_RAN __ CE_C_O_MP_AN_Y ____ _ ~ 1153746 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Dated: JULY21,200S THI! GRANTOR KlAUS 1. DIITIIANN AND NIdt.GARBTB DrrIMAN. JIUSBAND AND WIfIB /oj,.(\) fOt and in conaidcratioD of 1BIOOUAasAND011IBROOOD/tJIIDVAUJABUCONStDBRA.TION m hmd paid, """"')'1 JmJ! _1110 OONNBR ROMBS OOMPANY. A W"ASHINOT'ON' CORPOMl1l?N tho following deJuiI>ed rcol_litollecl in tho CoooIy cllONG T .. ~Nmnbor(l): 084710-<)11)7 .w Stole ofWasJriostnn- PARCBL C OF ~ING COON'TY LOT LINB ADJUS'IMBNT NtlGER S9OM0088 AS RHCOR08D UNDBR RECORDING MOHBBR 9804090613. IN KING OOONTT. WASHINGTON I BRING A pORTION OF TRACf 25, BLACIt. LO»f FIlm ACR.8 TRACTS. ACCORDING TO THB PLAT THBRBOF, RECORDED IN VOLtJotB: 12, OP PLATS, PAGE 101, IN KING COUNT'l, NASHIN<1t'ON'. SUBJECT TO: HXCBPTIctlS SET FORTH ON ATl'ACHBD EXHIBIT -A-AND BY THIS REPBRRNCB MADB A PART HEREOF AS IF P'ULLY INCORPORATED H2RBIN. CHlCAOO T1TlE INS. CO<J' REF# //112¢6"-/0 STATB OP WASHINGTON SS COONTY OF lONG ON THIS J.5#... DAY OF JULY, 2005, BEFORE HE, THE IJNDBRSIIlIIBD, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR TH8 STATE OP WASHINGTON. DULY COMMISSIONBD AND SKORN, PBRSONALLY APPJARBD XLAUS J. DIT'IMANN AND MAAGAR.BTB DI'M1oIAN,N' KNOWN TO ME: 1'0 BB THQ: INpIVlOOAL(S) DBSCRIBED IN AND WHO BJtBctn'BD 'nIB H'I'nc.IN INSTR'OMSNT AND ~D 'mAT THBY SIGNS[) AND SEALiD 'nIB SAME AS THIUR PR.JB AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND OBBD. FOR niB USES AND PURPoSES HERBIN MBNTIOHBD. .• \ . CHICAGO mLE INSURANCE COMPANY IlXHIBIT A EacrowNo.: ll537 .. 6 RBSERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS Cetn'AINED IN DEBD PR(JI( NOR'rHER.N PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, RESBRVING AND KXCEPTINO PRCH SAID LANDS SO MUCH OR SUCH PORTICNS THBRBOF AS ARE OR MAY BE MINERAL LANDS OR CONTAIN COAL OR IRON, AND ALSO THE OS! AND THB RIGHT AND TITLE TO THE OSB OP SUCH SURPACB GROUND AS MAY DB NECESSARY POR GROUND OPBRATIONS AND TIlE RIGHT OF ACCBSS TO SUCH RBSBRVBD AND Rl(CBPTBD MINBAAL LANDS. INCLtJDING LANDS CONTAINING COAL OR IRON, FOR THB PURPOSB OF EXPLORING. DRYBLOPINO AND NORXIOO THE SHotE. RECORDING NGMSER: 79509 COV.8NANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICtIONS, EASBHBNTS, NOTES, DlmlCATlC»1S AND SBTBACKS. IF.ANY. SET PORTH IN OR DBLlNBATBD 00 THE SHORT PLAT RBCORDBD UNDER RBCORDING NOMBBR 9007060508. COVlDIANTS, C'OODITIONS, RRSTRICTIONS, B'ASBMBNTS, NOTES, OBDICATIONS AND SB'l'BACXS, IF ANY. SST FORTH IN OR OBLltIBA'tBD ON THB BOONDARYjLOT LINE ADJUS'lMBNT RBCORDBD UNDER RBCORDING NUM88R 98040.90613. CITY 0' RBNTON, NASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4612 , INCLUDING THB TBRMS AND PROVISIONS THBRBOP: RBCQIU)£O: RECORDING lltIGBR: JUNB 21, 1996 9606:210966 \ .' • ( (r REFERENCE NUMIIl:ll(s) of documents assiped or released: ~ GRANTOR($) (Last oame first, then fiISt II3Wt ;uxI initials) : sllTk. 9,~£d 4. 5. AdditiooalllillDes on page of document. GRANTEE(S) (Last 0WIt fJtsI. then fLm name and initiais) 1 2 3. 4. Additiooal DllDtS on page of document. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (abbn:vialJ:d: i.c. 101. block. plat or Stction. Township. Range) [lij\(AJi ttl E.~ c (,C Sf':I (( 705 ASSESSORS PROPERTY TAX PARCEUACCOUNT NUMBER O~P(O -~ 0(07 -07 Additional legal Description on page I of document. • .- \ ~ 1IIect' ....... .... ~\...,.: \C.csP+-4.,"'5 -., .. ", • ., ..... ,. .. RECEIVED KWn., -;.-~ .-",,:,. -: -.~.-~_:''::.:'''''''-' , .. ~. ,_. CD -'" .elUI ''''Z~ /_'_' _________ <'to sa .. ~o# ~ I -. ".--'0 : ~ 0 ti' -; o ~ .... -.... -.:: Sr' . , I't" ,,' CIQi,M... / "J":.~ ~c_ •• ~ (-.. ".-\ , r----- a .. 0 r '-"" • .,.. 1 . ':.,. o _ -. , .... . : ..... ". :. o. ' f.: " I I . ~~ -, I EJ '. : , .... ta...-, .,.'f: I '.; i I ~o ... I .--i I ......... -. -,~ .. ~<. ... --'7 t.Hf'.1'S . L~~ .... ".lo.."'c.& "".,A,"", S; ""t.. T. "C.T). 'i\h.. 11. _ 10' ... ~ - " • r Don.mrnl Tklt(.) (or InaJutlc,n'l conla~ hcf"('ln): R~~e;rrntt N.mber(5) of DocuRlatJ .s.sit"td or reldsed.: . __________ _ AilhlioMI rdcrc:nc:c numbcn on P'IC P _ or docutntnt(s) C;un'or(s} (last n11M,. nrst •• rM.IJlUbls): _ ....::{05efd 11_ ~P KWI y L _ ;'3,., /-TJt , Addlhonal umcs 100 ~ee L.. or dtK-umenl's) Gnnt~l)(b.JI."'r. first aUlt, Initials): K llJ[q Coo A.J H AddlhonaJ nafT1(!S on pit.~e __ or dowment(!.): ___________ _ '-01_.;7 ~ Ulock: __ AdlhtlQQill legal as QJ1 ~&C ~ 1)( documcn~(~) Block: 1'I~tlSttllon: To\\"nstllp:___ Range to! B1ock: __ .__ PJaVScc.tion:__ TO .... 'lShtp: __ . Addluonallcgai IS on [I"'g.c ___ of docJment(~J .o\~JIII01l31Iq::all); on Jl~~(: ___ ordoc:umclltlj;) ,\~~t'!t~or's rrop ... rl~·Tu; Parrr-l!i\rrnu:s( toillmbcr(.\}: _ ri?, I f7 Ib 0 ~} ? 00 NOT WRITE IN MARGINS ·I·ht i\lIdilor/llc:cnnI1 r will rei)· nn Ihe information pr.,,·idrtl (In I),is rorm. The ,'aII will IIPI rud Ihr 311adlcd ducutntllt (0 \"(~rlfJ the acrurar~· nr cOinpJdcn('u ortht IndulDg inrormallon pro\-idt'd herdn. - , J ® KIM' CoIrty D"".o/~ .... EmirCIliWllClUJ $erYia:s L.,. tM $a-Yicts DiriIIen !Q) Oab::s6* A~ .so.iJI-m RmI_. W" 9IQ3iJoilIP Sensitive Area Notice For Permit Number: 59£) fI1313<p For r.r«1 Number: D'?/f1,,, 0/ 15 ,more fully d .. cribed" (51=. address) /3'/1 S" 1'1'1 ~ ,1111'"'. '5 ~ f(~7l7"), w .. Cj1o!:'1 This P'openy COIlIains sensiliw ..... and/or .emi.i •• IrQ buflers, as defined by .he King CooDly 5eIlSkive A, ... Ordiaaoce. KCC 2IA.24. The p,ovlsions of the Sensilive Areas OrdiDaIKe apply to Ihis property. Limitation may cxisl OD actions in or afk:clq Ibe "msicivc: 1lea5 Of datit buffen presenl 00 this p1'optrty. For furtha'" informacion 'epnlinJ sud! 1_ •. please COOIiICI.he Land Use Service, Division of Kina C .... 1I1 or ils 'UCteS.lO' ",,",y. Thi. no'ic. sbaliN" ",.jth <be I .... aDd ,b,li not be removed elctpl upon sJ*ific wriltm authorazatioD recorded herdn by Kinl COUAt'j_ I, (pnl!l) .sOSIn"1I ~. Sm."T>j t Knwi L. S ... ,pi • hereby <mify da! lamlhe owner !be obove·rmmlCCd p,oport)'. ft~M /7~· ~ SUBSCRIBED ANI) SWORN TO befol.C;n; <IIL< li...'"a.y 0 g,~riZ._. 19tJ IHJlllry sad 1\ lladunc:Dts SII,," CM.-111!.. ~ l'IoWy Public in aDd for Siale of W~hing1OD. residing at NO .. " .. I - • , £,,7 -7;3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 13/,AcK 1011-1'1 ~//Jt: /looC ~/lCT'5 L-uu::> e. t rl tl,'t;J (~.r.y I I. (pri.,) J"OSef'H A. s",.!!{ """,0 K".,.v L. S"",TJ/ n(JffTn'seal / ( / j . heRby W1ify 'ball un !he oWnt. of the above· refemccd propeny. so,'" GtmLt2~ Nolary Public in and ror the Suse of WiJ,$hing1on, residing at ..... 12." - ... • r / / / ..-'" ;/ " .. ~ ~~ I ~ / /0< l!' "-.~ ~r '" '" ~~ .~ '2 ~ ... nN .... 1:1." - • Projm No; loc01ion: •• COHOrrK"lNS OF PEMMrt/APPROVAL " 8911101)1)6 TYPE, AOOrTlON 1 ]4'') ,44th A'Rnut: SoutMasI SENS/T1Vf. AREA CONDITIONS, " [,ATE, 0111)1<19 PAGE, WI7fI A 100' wKklNft"cr of Mdi:sturbcd vqeUlton meas ..... cd from tlk 0.11. W.M. This stTeaIn i<; unc_ifie4,.., fat.,.: ~Iopmcm within dM: tOO' bvffc:t will reqain: stre.n classir.utiGLTWs ~ IIMISt be IlagaJ prior to gw! of c"~nlidion . n.M • I I I i ! I I '" lo_ :'.: ... ~ .;. CERTFICATE r. the c::,i:rsigned, W¥ Clerkaf tile City of Renton, Wazhlngton, certify that ~ Is a true and correct copy ~-...6.J~4~{.Jt."l"'--__ Slfl5aiJed and Sedel~(I::tJ.~-j~ CITY OJ' RENTON, WASHINGTON OBDDlANCB NO. 4612 All CE'........ OF 'IBII crrr 01' lIlIIiiW, .,,'Wt<M, &9'I'AIILl:1IIIDIII JUt UBDIII&B'l' DISTRIer POll &UrXDJn' __ SDVICIi III A ~ or 1'BII SOU'm BYe.rams, ... ........ DOIImI, lIlID $ ••• 1101) SUB-BABIJIS lIIID _I ........ 'IBII ~ 01' 'fII2 22.~ Ul'Qt 00 bI HCIIf TO TQ :rACILl:nD. THB CI'I'Y cotnTCIL OP THE CITY OP RB!ITON. lIASHING'l'OIJ. DO ORDADI AS POLloC*S: ,..,..,.,. I. There is hereby created a Sanitary Sewer Service Special ABSesSIaeIlt Distr'Lct for the area served by the Baat Renton SanitaEY Sewer Interceptor in the northeast quadrant of the City of Renton <Uld a portion of its urban growth area within unincorporated King County, which area is .are particularly described in B:xhibit "A" attached hereto. A map of the service area is attached as EXhibit "B." The recording oC this document is to provide notification at potential connection and interest charges. While this connection charge may be paid ... t any time, the City does not require payment until. such tire &5 the 'parcel is connected to and thus bsneCiting from the sewer Cacilities. The property may be Bold Or in any other way change bands without triggering the requirement, by the City. of payment of the charges associated with this district. I!ICTIOH II Persons connecting to the sanHary sewer facilities in this Special Assessment District and which properties f 1 , • ! I , , i 1 I ORDINANCE 4612 have not been charged or assessed with all costs of the Rast Renton Sanitary Sewer Interceptor. as detailed in this ordinance. shall pay, in addition to the payment at the connection permit fee and in addition to the system development charge, the following additional fees: A. Per unit Charge. New connections ot residential dwelling units or equivalents shall pay a fee of $224.52 per dwelling unit and all other uses shall pay a unit charge of $0.069 per square foot of property. Those properties included within this Special AssesS1!lent District and which may be assessed a charge thereunder are included within the boundary legally described in Bxhibit "A" and which boundary is shown on the'~~ attached as Bxbibit -B." SBe'l':l<M XII. In addition to· the aforestated charges, there shall be a charge of 4.11t per annum added to the Per Unit Charge. The . interest charge shall accrue for no more than ten (10) years from the date this ordinance becomes effective. Interest charges will be simple interest and not compound interest. QCfIOJ! IY. This ordinance shall be e!fective upon its passage, approval, and thirty (30) days after pl,!blication'. PASSBD BY THE CITY COUNCIL this ~ day Of __ ~J~u~ne~ __ ~L 1996. City Clerk 2 1 , I I , • " i -."..~,~. ~~-~-----...".-------------.~ ~ ORDINANCE 4612 APPROVBD BY THE MAYOR this 10th day of _..:J..:u:.:.n..:e _____ , 1996. Appr0.:L?as to fOJ:1ll: ot:~~~'P"I2'- Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: 6/14/96 ORD.576:5/20/96:as. i i 3 Jes~anner, Mayor I 1 I , , • • I i , f J j ~--~.,~.~.~>--~--------~, ~----------------r Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRtPTJON OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISI'RICT FOR THE CITY OF RENTON -EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR Portions of Sections 8.9, 10. 11. 14. IS. 16. 17.21 and 22 an in Township 23N. Range 5E W.M. In King County. Washington SectIon 8, Township 23N, RangeSE W.M. All of that portion of SectIon 8. Township 23N. Range 5E W.M. lying East of the East right-of-way line of SR-405 and South of the following descrlbecfllne: ~ at the Inter8ectlon of the East line of said SectIon 8 w1th the centerline of liE 7th Street; thence Westerly along said centerline of NE 7th ~ to Ita intersection with the centerline of Sunset Boulevard NE; thence Northerly along the centerline of Sunset Boulevard NE to the North Ilne of the Southeast ~ of said Section 8: thence West along said North Jine to the East rlgbt-of-way JJne of SR-405 and the terminus of said line . . S. cIIon 9, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of that portion ofSectlon 9. Township 23N. Range 5E W.M.lyIng South and East of the mllowiDg descr1bed line: . . BegInning on the centerline ofNE 7th Street at its lnteraed:Ion w1th the centerftne of Edmonds Avenue NE; thence Easterly along the centerlJne of NE 7th street to its intetsectlon with the cented1ne of Monroe Avenue NE; thence North along said centerline to the South lIne of the Northeast IA of said Section 9; theoce East a1o~ South line to Its Intersection with the cent.erline of RecJmond Avenue NE; Northerly along said centerlJne to Its tnten;ection with the cellieilJne of NE 10th Street; thence East along sald centerline to the East lIne of said Section 9 and the terminus of said line. SectIon 10, Township 23N, Fblnge 5E W.M. All of that portion of Section lO. Township 23N. Range 5E W.M.lytng Southerly and Westerly of the following descrtbed line: BegIDnlng on the West lIne of Section 10 at its int.ersectlon with the North line of the South ~ of the North II! of said SectJon 10; thence East along said North line to its intersection with the centerline of 142nd Avenue SE; t1ience Southerly along said centerline to its intersection with the North line ,of the Southeast ~ of sald Section 10: thence East along said North l1ne to its intersection with the East line of said Section 10 and the terminus of said line. l f , i , I I j i j I ! I ! I f . OA. ,. Legal ~tian of the Special Assessment District fur the City o(Renton-East Rentrm Interceptor Section 11, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. \ All of the Southwest ~ of Section 11. Township 23N. Range 5E W.M.. SectIon 14, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. Page2o{3 All of that portion of Section 14. Township 23N. Range 5E. W.M. deecrlbed as follows: All of the Northwest 'A of said secI1on. together with the Southwest ~ of said section, except the South ¥.l of the Southeast ~ of saxI Southwest ~ and eu:ept the plat of McInt1re Homesites and ¥.l of streets adjacent as ttCOIded In the Book of Plats. Volume 58. Pa«e 82. Records of King County. Waabf:Dgton. and emept the South 15l.55 feet of the East 239.435 feet of Tract 6. Block 1 of Cedar RIver Five Acre Tracts as reooltled In the Book of Plats. Volume 16. Page 52. Recorda of KIng Count;y. Wa~on, less Ih of the street abuttmg said ptaUon of Tract 6. Block I, and less Tract 6, Block 2 of sakI Cedar RIver Five l!ae Tracts, J.eae ¥.l of the street ac:jjacent to said Tract 6. Block 2. and eD:ept the South 82.785 feet of the East ISO feet ofTtact 5. Block. 2 of said Cedar RiYeT FIve Ar:re Tracts and less ¥.l the street adjacent to said portion of Tract 5. Block 2. SecUon 15, Townshlp28N, Renge5E W.M. All of that portion of Section 15. Townshtp 23N. Range 5E. W.M.. except the Southwest 'A of the Southwest lA of the Southwest ~ of said secI1on. SectIon 16, Township 23N, Range 5E W;M. All (jf that portlon of Section 16, Township 23N. Range 5E W.M .• exx::ept that portion of the Southeast 'A of the Southeast IA of the saki Section 16lyiDgEast of the East line of the Plat of Maplewood Division No. 2 as recorded In the Book of Plats Volume 39. page 39. Records of KIng County Washington and Its Northerly exfenskm to the North line of said Southeast lA of the Southeast IA of the saki SecUOD 16 and except that portion of said sectton lying Southerly of the Northerly right-of-way line ofSR-169 (Maple VaDeyHighwayJ, _ SectIon 17, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of that portion of Section 17. Township 23N. Range 5E W.M .• lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right-of-way of SR-169 (Maple Valley HighWay) and Easterly of the East right-of-way line of SR-405 less that portion lying generally West of the East and Southeasterly llne of Bronson Way NE Jytng , • , I I r I I ! I I I I ! I • • ! I : Legal o-ripfion o/the Sptdtrl Assessment District for the CityofRmton -fAst RmJ.on Irrtnctptor Page 3 0(3 between the South line of the NE 3rd Street and the Northeasterly margtn of SR~ 405. section 21, Township 23M, Range 6E W.M. All that portion of Sectlon 21. Township 23N. R 5E W.M.lylng Northeasterly of the Northeasterly r1I!ht--of-way line of SR~ 169 (Maple Valley Hlgtiway) and West of the East line of the -Plat of Map1ewood Division No. 2 as recorded In the Book of Plats. volume 39. page 39. Records of King County. Washington. SectIon 22, TOWMItIp 21M, RIInga 6E W.M- All of that portion of Section 22. Township 23N. Range 5E W.M. deecribed 88 fOlIow8: All of the ~ 1,4 of the Northeast ~ of said Section 22 lying Nort:bedy of the Southerly line of the Plat of ~ Heights as recorded in the Book of Plata. \IOIume 78. pages 1 through 4. ~s of Ring County. Wasbfngton. Tbgetherwltb the North 227.11 feet of the West 97.02 oftbe Northeast ~ of the Northeast ~ of said Section 22. , I I i I j I I I 1 i zq 4 ........... CJDA . \. Exhibit a EAST RlNTON INTERCEPTOR Special Assessment District Boundca y I • i l 1:24,000 i -------City UmiIs ! ! [Z-r-.::z:."."" ~ ..... J..J Speciol ",Ass_v_oem DIstrIct ; ! I ! , ! --h-----, j~1 'I" ~Ii -.1 -'. .~. "Or ~~., -···,<0·-·''-· K .. -' j) 1\ ..... 11' 10· oot· I~Z. ND. 7;5 78 ...... V' .. 1L --~!:.i,-- \ J I 1·4 15 .. ... • N HI' King County Recording Departr."ent .'.~------_ .. _.-. ..•. _------, .,,' ", . ~-.". s!, _ CQ[g1TY OF I . Gordon S. Rector oath, deposes ilntl says: THAT he fs: a reytstcred land surveyor; THflT he rr;:,;de it sur\.'f"!'y I~·f li1rd in tr-1I;>J~4yE 4 Quartor of Section _1_5_ Township ~ R"n!)f! 5_(_' fl.lt.; ',JIl1ch survey was recorded on the _~ .. ___ day of Decpmbpr lry.80 ' in volume __ ~Z,,5 __ of Surveys at page --Z2L-Recorrlin~ """ber 8012039003 .•. t Re cords 0 f ___ ..JK"jun!!lQ _____ County, :.lashing-ton. THAT there bein~.111 error. the affiant approves. lhe followinf) chanrJ~ on sa; d survey: The north/south fence .Alo.n.!l..tlllu,,~st .sid.!> 1li.tD.ts...25.. through .29. Black loam 5 acre tracts is a<tua!1y ""s.t..llLj!r.l!ller.t)'-.Jine~..inswILnLeas.LaLit as shown~ T~ fence has now, however, been lICyed to tbe actnal property as staked by this ._ ~ Go£.dJl1!.3~.!ll!.llnL _______ _ Heq. Land Surveyor Surveyor Seal (er·t-Mo. _J.l.R9L .. _____ _ SUBSCRIBED AND S!~OP.N to before me this 16 th day of September. 1981 ,--/"') ~7 d~:< ('.:~~.('"~_ t1ot{rfy'-:"'p-ubfic t'in and (or;-"tJleS-tate'·o"f- Washinqton t residin9 at /~"<'f{t.~.~~:~_--"'.c<::"~~::'-_. ______ _ Survey I ndex. correctt\~ dnd appro'Jp.d by . _______ . _,. _, ___ . f I \ EO lor Record at RIIQUest 01 4 . :"1!1n"' J...) I f"I ' _To: DlACU t 4 • .... CUOI.a .,.,~. no Hi j= VAt IS. Joe 1UIIUID, .. 'U" ....... ,Pac:dorAc:alMNa.Ita: .""0-01......, .ww.'IIIaI ..... n $ , •• IIIp..... ,.... ....................... ......., .. ... ......... 1'1 is i aoc.. ____________ _ no_ .. no_" PlIClPlO ... __ .. nna COllOM> 1\cbi:::ddIrJ Ie. onux ........... "l.K.., .. , ...... "" ... . cxIIIIIc--........ ct ,.. eIJ!IID CII' eft = _11_ ... 1Iid ...... 1IMR:a1l S20 "MI" tal 8M. 2., "MI·", ... till) l~"). BomIMI"INISl.c:Ddr:r."...... .. rt ~ _ nPI"I arm" .. rJO/l ........ . ......................................................... _ ......... .. W.uJlVICl'(Jft...IJIoIIk 'lIIIIilJ'.fNMMIII.MCunro .... IJQ1"aUMUT VMr.4I(WA)"'IO).OI ,_ .. MI.....,wt 'ate ltl' .,', ". -.' .. ., - I • • • ,- LCUUI II 151'155111 .- I , I · • • \ " , .~ . .. ~ LOU " 151)15'111 ~; ... _ .... ror ... perIods .... ~ .......... Tho __ ............ _ ...... _ J by_"'*" .. Lendco'. ___ -_........ '~_Ifa....-,.. .. _ _ -...... .-._.· ................ __ .. _~.rlPDlo .. ....,..., • 10 __ ........ 7, I AII_ ....... __ ....... __ .. ..-....... _. ___ ~ ..---.. = .. -.................. ~ ........ --......, ....... ; ..L ~II""''' "-"'-_111 ... _,",,,, __ ,-,,--1 ..... ---~..-..,_....,"_II .. _~.,_. 1 ~..-... ---.. ':':!:.\-,.-......... _ .. ; =~::*"' 'I' ;'/;!!':::-·i",:_,,',7:·~-=='t".,t: i _..-_ .. ~ __ .,tItIollecotljo __ .......... _ / ..,_ .... _. _1Iott'-....... __ ,...,.. __ .-....... _--_ .. _.-.-..-..,_ ... -......... f ~..,-.. ..-=--.. ....,...,. ... ..:z.--..,.tItIo-...-I _ ............ '1110 .............. -... :t?:53 _..-... ___ ....... cl..-.......... _ .. \ _ .. _ ...... --___ == .. ==:=2 ........ _ " ... ...-,"_ ......... 21 ...... 10 ....... ::.'-....... _ =-.. ~~.::J-Wl ...... ~., .... ~ .. =-r.'r-,.. .. I ......... l 1.--:_. s un sA) ,:='"'.4''''''' • ' . ~., I ' .. --S:S::!' -... '-~.......... 'I IfIll"'; = ... _clJlill _ ... __ .. _,..~.. ~ '5 ........ ......, , 7 , .... ' ...... wt.Id ....... I' 11111'. I I I ~'I ... .."..... ' .. J • v;, ~ ----....,,' .. s·fir .. '->_ .. = .. -....-. .. _ .. ,-,__ s I. I _I ___ ::: ............ atJ p '; : .. , 7' fW&:p;" ...... I :11.. ..... .. -:"':Ji.... -• .-. ..... -----. .. _. .. ......... 1 .. .,=._.---.... __ .......... • ~ ...... I 11....-.,..-._ .... ~ ..... _ = _ .. _..,.tItIo-..._.~.~_ .... _1to1o 1I-:':.:'C5----.. _In I .. _"'-(1< .. ..-_..,_1 I ,, __ ... IIott_ ;, _., ... _...... ..-... i ,--._.:::::01. . .. "'-" ........... _IIIN1-.,_ ..... -. __ ......, II. .,. __ " ... ___ ......... JiJIo,. .... "-r .... _ ... ,.. .. JIdo .... __ r ~ -';;-= .. ~ .. ...-1, " ... 1o ... ~U_IilIoIO=."._ ... ... Ft .• :..====. .. rra:;.:=:, :g ':,7, If-=: CO) ~ =:Iue~.:-.:_~~~~':.,"l*:"'=..,~-=:.:= ~ ~ ... ...-..--... SoadI7---.10_..... _ ....... -. .. .... ...,.."._ ....... AMtIopI~.., .... _-... -"'" 7 • ...-. ...... _ .. en d .... ~ i! _..,...-_JIoIo ............ ' ____ ,,_ ........ ,'j. bytltlo _~_ ... ~ ___ ..... ____ ~ __ .". I . • .. __ ... _ ... ...,.... ... __ --'-t .. -~ ., .. == .,..-... --_ .. _" .......... _-1 ",.1NIs-.,. __ ..,.....-_ .. _,.. __ 10_ i u;""..,_,. ____ ......... .;~ ....... _ .. bolo-._ 1 " _,.,."...-=,. __ 'I M ........ ___ ........, la ......... I .......... ,.._ .. _" .... __ ........,.10_ ,.... ............... '-crIffRMlll"'Iada'.lfli tl., ....... =:-"'OCG¥CDp b ... ___ ,.,.~ __ III ......... _ "'1:2...-t _..-.......... ..,. __ JIoe __ """' .. ..-....... J...-,'" . wUI aac:cpI. _ ... resaiII "",.."1" n:scne III .. fIl.....-.: ......... Lossraene PIJII'C* 1 .., .. ,.....,. ........ .,,.. ...... oII.coda,il ____ {lollte_ ... ltrJloeporiod .... Lcttdor ..... ltal __ ",._-.....-",.Latdctoplo_~ ... ,, __ :";:' . ; ..... ptI7,.......,.. .......... Jo ___ ltuot.-ittdJ'td, .... pm1de '1os1 .......... III ... ......-ror __ ........... """,.-triJltuy-_-__ ... tcndct / . .. ...,-In. j t. .........LctttJa ......... ""' .... ____ lttIpoeUotuol,..""""' ......... _ .... __ .,.. -" .. "..,. .... IatpcctIottJPdllol-.......... _ f .t, Cc: I .,. nePfClUlD*oIl1J .... ordal .. 'out_'la~lIra:toro: C4!C!!1!e! IaICGlNlCCtloa .;: with lIlY ca' b' DI or GIber IIIdtIt: of..,. pan tl1IIe PropeIt)', or ror ~ iD Uw of COIIIteIIIIIdon. art hcrdIy ..aped ........... ,..., to J..-. I 'A Ihc n-m oh.OUIIakiIII otlhcPrapcny, lbe procceduhaJl be IJISIIkd 10 Ihc IUIftI Jm.lICdbJ'1IW Scc:uri17 f '1\SU'VJftCM" wbabcrur DGtlt.e. due., -.iIh U1 QCtDpUd IoBomnm. II l!IcCWCllt oIa J*Ualllkbtloflhc PrDpcI1y • • ill whic:lIlbc (airJlWka nJucoftlia Pn:Ipcrty lanedia1dy before tile IakIq is oquilO 01 pealer u..tleomotllll W",'III:'ft."lo."".bOP F.." .".,,:\otMlR.MC \/l'IIIOIUt IIflTal.l)IUfT tDiUal_'1=@ VM'.fR(WAt""'~OI r_JOtt,..,.MnIoWSr71 P.~ l of' "'AVD~i:D : .. ' :".' -.-. ~---."-,,- • -I, :'j. .. ; ... ,i • , '; -(t ., ., :j ! ! ,~ _--I. 1 , , / \ , '-I .$ . ~.' ,:~ '~i ;~ '''d 'i f '\ , 1-·'tb f ~ 1 , I I 1 ) t j " 1 • .. . , .~ , ,I ~ I ., ill ",~,~ .. ~;~~. '$ '~ .~ ·t~ 1 iI J I · • , ~ ~ .' t i!~ ~s ~~ 'iI. ii iJ q (n !~ :I'~ liS ~I ~ • ~ ::: • .. It mOQ i ~fll t>t~~ tiJI if 0000 I'll illl f 000 If-f j fii I f 1 .. 9706231064 ! ~',;~..;.. ) i.: hi) . .." : .. ,,"," . .. ... J .,.1., ;-0'-• • • . " • .,.-. :l! "/ . ~"--:,"_ .. ''; JII ·hlil~i iJi-iiil f 4'1''' • r l.. f I ill .,ffl h Ii iJ lIt 1·li= i~Jf J 1 r I rrl' d II' • ..II I'll J lfd:Ul!llIu j IIJI JI~tll'ilrt.-~;"'it! I·I~ JI Ulrf)~unfrll f t fllfflH i"· II ii 'f~ii'fl1flflil 5~~ ••• rit~:11 r -I ttl,' J'IIIR!~ .. I u. J II J fe ·.·.,.,:.·1 " ,-.,.:, . :;:: <,-~' ,:: >: ·f '''. -' . '1 1 ,,'.... '-:"''";., :,'" .;~', .. ;-~/:.~,'.:', ::,:1'" ':,:> . :;:.: ,; '.;: . ~.,; ' .. .. '. ':"~. .j . .: '. "-. ~. . ·:3' . ~:~~ •. ', . -: . ~ :1 '. : --I • .~ ,I :j • 1 ~ ~. . . .... i .: I " ,'i .~ .' . ( .'/ . ./' IE 'Wclf;wawtw. i .,. .. . .. .'1 . ". i ! ~:, ': ;, "':-.: ." ':/-·:-t·c~-t::;~::·--~'~·.",.';:·'~~T~~7. :'-J"t~~;'~ry,: ~?~~:'~~:~1':'>::'~'~'-"'~'?~;:'''~:'"::~ ~:::- I ,," ;, '~, ....... 15UW.17 BYSlOIIINOIII!I.OW. __ .. _IO .. _ .. __ Ia .... ~ --.. · .. oWaloI-_-.... _.... ' ~ $TAft 01' WASBMiIJiOH } . c-,rI a .. 00 .... ..,...-,. __ --JOSUII A. $lilt ..... DtBr L. &10.111 10 __ ""'''---_ ....... _ .. _ ............ butI .... P P W" tM' ........ _. tbat!' n.. .... -,. ............. _ .. __ _ G,VI!N_.., ___ .... diIo I~ft. ..,., J_ • .,,, (~{ .. 4£-( __ E>pa ... Ol/DliOl W..urI1J'IGtOI't.".""'~L~"Jw::JUW' VMP .. A(WA}""~I ,... ... "" ...... "" ,.6t1' ' .. _ .. ,., ... ,/ ,.:. ~ .. ' or. ... ....,. . f I-- . "-.- •• l.oiii .. 15U155117 FIXED/ADJUSTABLE RATE RIDER (lyar,.....,.,.II ... c.,.) nosPIXI!DIADlllSl'AILIlMllIlUIB"_'" ._ oily" _. I", • ... iI' J , __ ... ,,~ .. __ ... II' .. ~.,..fII ....... orkwkr Plod (1/10 "Sooud\J _, " ... -... II-br 1M t'l ' (1/10 __ "> ..... a-"1n.dI ................ (dIIUHaII") ..... ew IS -, me ••• "";0-,.. ... (1M ''LoooIIr'1or .... _doOIlOd......, ... __ ..... __ .... _ .. 13U5 1'" .. .-"" __ II" .. tll5J , •• i'I''I ....... J DE CAlf me .WA .. NrI ........ -'-.... ..,...Jt.\ft1Bl ........ JRIS'I'PAY, .-..... r. .,. ....... 11 ...... _ ae ......... ScadI;r---. -.. .-_--_.- A. ...,...,1\a&&\ftADJIIOIIr.I.YP,AftIDf1'ClUNGIS 1k ___ ... ___ .. " 1,_, ne_ .... ..-"" ........... __ ...... ..--...... - .. ~Aa& .. iibii MU.u. JllClll'lBLY p,:\YllltllTCll.AftGlS I:l:laa...-1110 ____ 1 ... ,., .................. __ ... ""'''''" .-.:r, atl2, .... I l' I I IAIJ'.,.,...,cIIIIIIe.tMt "".., ._ __. 'I1Ie ___ ... ____ -.. •• ........................... .,.............. ',t IKIIIII.·-a...""" ~n._ ........ _ ...... OoopDllo, ............ __ ..... _ .... _ no,. .... "b ... -,_Jil:ld.~-n-,-........ -__ .,I,..,.-.-., ... ____ no __ .... lIpe_ ........ _·,doJo-- C"-DaIo "_""'c.o._" 1I' ................... ..-. ... __ wtII_ ..... _ ..... _ ..... .....,..,.... .-no __ .. p.. .. _" .... _ (CIcl 1 ' oI~ __ CIoDp_ ... __ dl_., __ .... .,~ ..... .... i : _JiCiIII(Il( ',750' ) .... a.-_ l'bc ". HoNer wW dItI ,.... Ilc rcsaII tJlddI ........ ta. JaftSt ~ 01 ... pc a'" (O •• mI/ ............. Iloii~_ .. _4iI>I ...... , .... __ wiQ .. .., ___ _ .... -CIIooFD& 11IoNooo_wiQ ___ ... _oI ... __ ..... _ .. _ .. ...." ... ...................................... CIoap.,.. .. ,.. ..... ..-;"oo. .... __ ... Ua v+A d.", ~..,.... lkla8JtoldW ~ wid be drrc DCW aIDIZIII 'Il.,.-addy ",... (D)..-.. __ """"" tbc,*"" _I ........... ..,.. IMIin1CDpDaetrill "" be __ lJ ,GOO' or 1e5I.... 5.00". 'Dacditr • .,. ....... iaIaaI: na';D nnabc~ Ql'dec:ra:lcldo. U)' RAp: Oansc Dale.., 1IIIftC.... no pu .. poiIII(.I, ( .,_, )( ....... _or_ ........... _,............... u _ . ..,. bl1CmIl,* ... Ine¥abcpalCr_ 13.000'. (E) W ...... DouolClolqa My MW iJ:Itc:fts1 nlC will __ dfccthc oa ~ Clmt&c 0.. I wiD pay the ..... of...,. DeW IDOI8Jy _ ..... 01.' on "" fInI-..... ......... !IaIc ......... CboDp _ ........ __ of"" -IIIIr ,,.)'01<lI0 dwigeo 'pI" MULTUTATlflXWADJtJJfAM.lRATERlDU.IY'Ed11llAll7J:YJI'mEX,s ..... '....,..' ...... Ml.l/.un. ....... VM'.J4)II/NOfr1 '_JII2 SIN PI. J ., 1 n:u1lDU )I' '. .. . !. r i ,! ~ , . , I · • i . i J , ., ., , , ~ a te en ...... ' . ..... ~ .. , "LUll 't 1.11111111 ........ B .. -: = ~ .. !i:;' . ..- .- BY SoeIoIlowlr. __ ... _ ..... _ ... ___ .. iliisFbodl AdjoIIIMe --. M\lLnnA.nnuDADJ\IIJAIUlAnlUDa..nu1'UAlUJrJ~~ .... w.~1.-... 't'MP-IDI".) .~'JD Bt "F J " 2. rnl7l00 ":' . .t) "'-.( , I ! i , 1 I • • -} ... --lid_To: ~ .......... ATD. c:uag ftADDWI 520 U~ D1' ftS. 21t IUMLIUIIJ, _ '8033 ";'-.. -~.,. _',,.... .. __ ... '10-1111.., LOU h 1I1Jl~7 ASSWE OF DBED OF TRUST 116-Fli ED BY PNWf i -6 1m VAUllII!CI!IVI!D, _AaIpor.""kRIIy __ ........... _" CDR 1 • 2 C • ,_ ,2" OLD I11.III:. .... lID., , GI ..., II AsIfpoo,oI.tdle __ .c ... Au/pl<fo ........ -'1_ ..... _Docdol r .... __ u. 1tt, .-Ir __ ... ____ r L. 8Il'ft, __ tn .. 1201 _~ __ ,. .... , .. , -rn·, ..... 1 ~dIe ..... _-"'_1a ._ c-q.sc..an 7' 3 . ...-a.a-_8 .. , IJI.IICIlIMII na ... 'PACB, ~DO to ~ ,LIt' I_ .....-12 GI'" ..... , ... 1'1, D' KlIIII CDU:I'n', KM8iiillW. I I ~ i I I If 11 ... :. .,' .. ' , . '. .. CO' .... ·co .... .... RETURN ADORESS WOALD SAVINGS CENTIIAL PROCESSING CENTeR CLOSING OEPAII'TlEHT P.O BOX 659641 SAN ANTONIO. TX 78285-9548 0017654031 \. WASI •• G.ON STATE COUNI'Y AUOIT'OIIIRECCIIIIIEII"S INDEXNl FOMI !Cow_ SMef _15041 Docvnent ntl .. DEI!D OF TRUST -ADJUST AIIt.E BIWEEKl. Y I. ... ~ tnt. theft ,.,,, ...,.. MIl _""11' L KAMPHIIUS 0 I AH£ L I-IOEUTY NATIONAl.. TmE z. KAMPHAUS HEMlV B '!JZO'l/l1-7:> ~ 3. • fl'[!1 0 •••••• , ....... DI!o~~ .t_ eI LNI ...... ,.d. .... ,.,..t .--... ~ _LO SAYINIIS BANK. FSB. II. FEDERAL SAY INOS IINIt ~ o..onptIOn ~.e.d Ie, tot. ...... ,~ or ...... towMh ••• -0-1 'IWoCl' 32, IIIKl( LOi\M P'IYB lI<l!B 'IIU\Cl'S 00 AcU.bo"..a '-tal II Oft Ex ..... A IJ' • .,.". .... A ..... .",. PrOperty T_x P.cel cw Aooow'lt Numb..- OU710 0140 06 o "" ......... Prlitp ... t, T ..... Nyrna-. not ,.t itU-lOrwcl Aetenmoe Numbert.) of Dooum .... ta ... Igned or relHHd NOT APPLICABLE n.. "'"'ltor or ~dln. Of h .... Will ,..,. ol'ttM"'.m.flolio prOWItt.40ft t'li. 'Of," Tl'!tIlt.r, ""lIyt,. the Il00 ... ,,. to ."."ty the Mew"y af or the comJilet",", 0' tt.. IMtp, .. I .. 'ann.boll ptllmd ... k« .... ~- 5011045 ... 10. 011911-tII1 ... 41 ... I"t,. 1 UMIU' .. Ul !"U l I I ..... .... or-- e:> .... co 00171>54031 DEED OF TRUST ntiS IS A fiRST DEED Of TRUST WHICH SECURES A NOTE WHICH CONTAINS PROVISIONS ALlOWING fOR CtIANGIES IN MY INTBIEST RATE. FIEOUENCY NID AMOUNT Of PAYMENTS NID PRINCIPAL BALANCE ONQ.UDING FIJTUIE ADVANCES AND OS SL'IED INTERESTl AT J..ENDEJrS OPTION 1lE SECURED NOTE MAY BE RENEWED DR AENEGOTIATm 1lE MAXIMUM AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL IW..ANCE SECURED BY THIS oem Of T1IIJST IS 5309.371> .00 WHICH IS 121>" Of THE ''NOTE AMOUfr' L DEFINITIONS OF WORDS USED IN nus oem OF T1IIJST fA) _ty .... '""->t TIN Ooed of TI'UOt. _ IS dalOcl APR I L 08. 2002. will be called the "Security Instrument" III Bon_ DIANE L KAMPHAUS AND HENRY B KAMPHAUS. HIFE AND I&JS8AHD .... _lInN'" "" coiled "Borrowor' _ .omeIImOt sarpy ,. '" __ " ... . .,. .-.... la ~. _LD SAVINOS RANt. FSB. A FEDERAL SAVIN8S BAM<: ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ... .. ... ... I ITS SUCCESSORS AlCJ/OR ASS GI EES .... be _~" ~ .. A FEDERAL SAVI_ lIMIt •••• ... .. ... ... ..... 'WhIch" orgIfItud .Iftd ex_ '-"dIr the laws of U. lhted States ~. __ IS 1901 HAAAI_ STREET. IWlLAHD. CALIFORNIA 94812 lOt __ The note ~ by &.ro_ .nd hav'"ll tho ....... _ as II.,. 5eanty InstnmenI _ be called the "Note" Tho Note shows ..... I owe Londar tho """"'" p!""",,,11 ..-..un' of US 1247 • 600 00 (1110.. Am"""'. plus ICCt\IOd and dIIf.,ed "'''''est ond such other IInOUlto .. ._ .. the Note I _ p!"omoaed 10 p., """ deb. In IHWMIdy paymemo and 10 ply the """ .. Nil by APR I L 29. 2032 (E) ~. Tho p!"operty tNt IS dodO _ ""low .. Sect"", II orrtrtIed "Descr1P1Ion of tho Proper1¥" W>II "" called tho 1'ropo<Iy" 1Ft SWna S.cured The amo .... ts desa !bed betow If"! Secbon • .n:rtled "Borroww's Tr.,sfer of R9"rts III the Property" KJmetJmes WI' be caned the "S1omS Secured" (0) P..on AnV parson. orprulltJon. goverrment.al authonty or other ~ wNI be c.alled ·Penon· H Truator. Beneficiary. Trua .... Borrower IS the "Trustor.M lender 19 the .. Benefic...., and FAST AlVEAtCAN nlle INSlJRANCE COMPANY. a C.llfornta CorpOl"J1IOf\. IS the "TNlt.e· II. BORROWEII'S TRANSFER OF RIGHTS IN 1lE PROPERTY I rrovocably gron! ...,d convoy the Proper\Jr to tho Trust ••• "' trust to<" Lande<. With II power of .ale atmJect to the terms of this Secunty Instrument ThIs means that by signing II ... SIICI.<'Ity Instrumen!. I om giVing Lends< .. d Trust •• tho .. nght. that ... stated In tt .. Security 1natrwnen1. and also those fights that the law gives to lenders who .a benetlCl.11$ of • deed of trust and to trusties of .a deed of trust I ." giVing Lender ..,a TfUS.tM 1he$e rtght:$, to pt"Qt8ct Lender from poSSIble 10$ses that might r,sutt 11 I fill to (I) pay ~n amounts owed to Lender ~er the Note and aU other notes S8CU'ed by thiS Seeu-Ity Instrument. called the ·S8CU'"ed Notes: Includmg lutu'e advances made by lender and any changes to the Secured Notes made w.th the wntt&" consent of Lond.r. SOMNl1 1111 D7 .IIJ.·,,, A~'. OiFfJ'R[D INTERUT DEED Of TRUST·AOJ I!IIW5"':'LY "_goo 2 WA ~ -co ..... .... .... ... 0017554031 InI ~. WIth .,terest. .. y .",O\Il\s that Lendor spends under Paragrlphs 2 and 7 below to protect tile vak>o of the Property and Lender's roglots .. tile Property. and /III) keep all of my other promo... and "11".......... under thos Searlty Instrument. the Secured Not.. .nd .My m.,gea to the Secu'ld f\k)tes made WIth the wntt .. consart of Lawer III DESCIII'TlON OF TME PROPERTY I grlo Tr\I$Ie. r9rtt .. the Property described below Of The property _ IS located It 13606 144TH AVEHUE SE. RENTON. WA 81069 ••••••••••••••••• _. n.~ ~ of the Property • _ IS Exhobrt "A" whell II ..-• port of U.s See\roty _ TI .. Property I. caled tile "Oooscri>ed Property" i0oi All buoIdongs and DU-''''''~. thai ... Iocatod on tile Deoa toed "'" All nghts .. _ pr'DpOrty tim I .... _ owner of tile Doocrioed Property These r9'rtI" ... known as .ulm,,,l$:, r9rts .-.d IPP"t~ .tbched to 'the Property. DvI All ranis or royolWs and other oncome from the Described Property. MAlI....,.,.... 001 ond !IN r9rtt .., profIts. __ roghts ond .. ock _ ... port of tho DNu lINd Proporty. MI All rights 1l1li I __ n tho ..,., whoch .... n the streets or roods .. front of. _ or next 10. 1he Deoc:riJed Property • Mot All m.tur.o ... ... now or ., tho fuIuno woe be on tile 00 ... toed Property or on 1M property doscrobod on _ W of Ihos Sec:toon. Mol All of tile n~ ond proporty -=-.. aobooctJono (od throoq, !wi of Ihos S __ , oc __ ., the """' •• 11><1 All r...,-,....ms Df or ooddotoons to the property doocnbed ., S\bsectxlns ~,) throu!#, /VIIi of tho. Sectooro. ond 1><1 AI, of 1he omount. thot , pay to LIIndor undor Paragraph 2 below IV. BOMO,IIBl S RIGHT TO GANtT A SEaMITY INTEREST IN THE PAOI SaTY N«J IIONIoWER'S OIUGATION TO OB'IN) OWNERSHIP OF TIE P-"' .. , promose that ~} I r.wtuIly own tho Proporty. hI} 1 M. the roght to gront and convey "'1 Property to Trustee, .-.d Iqf) there '-8 no outstanding dalms. charges. hens or encumbrtnCes ega.nst the Property, except for those which ... of pubhc record I grv8 • general WIfT ... ty of t,tte to Lender Thfs mans that , WIJI be fuly rlspouslble tOl' .,y losses wtvch landSl' suff ... s because ..someone other ~ rnryMif and tne Trutt .. h .. .om. of the rights It! the Property whICh I promise that I hP" I prom .. 1l1li 1 wIn dofend my ownershop of lIoe Property agaonst any clllllTO. of such rognts COVENANTS f proms. m I asiYee ~th lander as follows BOfV\OWER"S PROMISE TO PAY I Will pay to lender, on ttme. all principal and Intarast due under the Secured Nota, and any prepaymsnt and late charges due under the Secured Notes SD044lC 1111 117 U11'"" ""0 PHD OF TlIun .... Q.J eIW~!"11(l v WA ~ ... ) 0017664031 2. PAYMENTS FOR TAXES AND INSURANCE (AI Bon,,-" ObIlptiono I will pay • .-ncurts necessllf"V to pay taMes and hazard llSU'ance pr.-ntLmS on the Prop«ty u well as ~ leasehofd payments. grCUk:l rants « mortgage ,"surmea premune It, .,vt 18) &crow A •• _ s.A>,oct to oppIIcZle law. no ..... ow ..,.. be roquoreel •• copt upcn wntt", demond by lender. .. wIIIch case. I _ pay to Lender on tile ,., payments ... due ...... tile Nol.. .....101 Iho Not. '" p.d .. full. • sum ~ fo< 101 yowfy lox ... penoltJes ond • __ rnoy """'" proonty 01l1li' tin Sacuroty Inoln.ment ... ..... on tile Proprty. ." yowfy _ ~. or ground .onts en Iho Property. of ..,. lei v-"" haJard or proprty ...... onc. promuns. 1<1 v-y flood ...... onc:e P"~ tf .,v. rd Ief .,...fy iiiOitg SI nsur8nCe pt'1f1"U1"tS. If .,.,.. n..... Jt .... w. QIed "Escrow""',' L_ ""'Y. II .., ""'. collect .." hold _ 1\ .. _ not to •• c.ed the """' ....... _ • lender few • f-.rly ._d ~ loon 1liiy .oqute for .. oscrow oa:ount lnIor Iho _.. Real EstIte Sentomon! Proc:tOGJres Act of 1974 as ~ from bm. to _ 12 USC • 2601 .t Hq rRESPA1 ...... ..oIhor low !hot """""" to the __ • _ _ If 80. lender ".,. II .., _ 'collect ond hold Mndo WI .... .".,..,. not to exoeed !he _ arnourt lendor moy __ the omount of _ cIu. on Iho _ of anon! __ ..... _ esbmat.s of 0JCpendttur ... of full ... &crow ,..,. .. ICCClI'dInce WIth ",pllcobl. 1_ The Fmds _ be held .. ., _ whose depooott or ...... ed by • fodor .. ogency. "'''''''*_,. or ~ jncIudong l_. 'f Lander IS sut:II .. ~ or WI .., Feder .. .-"-' _ ~ ...... ..,ply Iho _ to pay "'" Escrow ,..,. ~ rnoy not oItwge .,. for -.g _ IppIplg "'" "... ......" _ooIyDog the etQ"Ow ccount. or v.",.-a the &crow "*'"' unIe •• L.,.,. pay. mil .,... on tile _ ondIor ~ '-w permtb ~ to ..... """" • c:horve 110 ...... L_ "..., reqa.we me to PlY • cne-tme ctwge for ., 1Il1f~.1deI1t ru& IIkItIt8 tax repot"'\NiQi ..-.oc:. used by lender WI eot .... _. _ tin 1011\ _ oppIoc_ low prOVl'" _ .. u...., ... _ .. ..-or """..-low r ............... II> be petd. L __ not be r~ to I»Y me .., ___ It 0< _ en !he Funds Londor sholl fIIY8 10 me. WtIh>UI _go. on ....... accountlng of tile Fundo, showo1t credotI -.d dobtts 10 the FL<Ids and .. __ for """"" eod1 dttbtt to the Funds _ ..-Tho Fundo or. pledged .. _ .... ecunty for ........ """"ad by tl .. _.ty "-ut..-.I If the FL<Ids held by lender ""coed the -. peomottod to be held by 3". "lie Iirw. Lendw shaI account to me fOf' the 8.J(C8$S N.nds In ac;cQt"cYnce wrth the .tt<pI'ements of oppI~ low If the _ of the Futd. held by lordor at "'Y bme IS not SUfi.,..." 10 pay tile &crow ,..,. -. -. L_ mey so notify me ,n wntong. one!. WI such ~ I sholl pay to l_ Ite ....,unt _y 10 mall. '4> 1110 dofocoency or shorUge I_",*" "" the doftclOllCy or mortage ., sccord-.ce WIth tho r~.ments of the lender • .at Its sole dlsc:ret:KJn.. WI the mlnnef .-.d-tITI,s prescrbtd by RESPA Upon payment WI full of .01 .....,. """,.d by.... Socunty ~ Lender shall promptty .0flOld to m • .., _ held by Lender If • ..-. _"Ph 28, Lendiw shell aCqt.llr, 01" MIl the Propt!ll'ty. l.«lder, pnor to the ac:::qUI,rtion or sal, of tn. Property. shall apply In.,. Mnde held by lender at the time of acquIsition or sale as II credit ~nst the sums MClred by ttn Seclnty Jnstrument 3. APPLICATION Of _ROWEll'S PAYMENTS UnI ... "'" law roqutre. othorw .... Linder WIll .pply ooch of my poynwrtl under the Secwed Notes and \Wlder P,ag-apI1s 1 .-ad 2 above 10 the following order and for the folloW1ng plXpoSII FIrSt to plV prepayment charges !lie lItder the Secured Notes, Second, to ply my adv.nces IiJe to lender '-h1er thiS SSClWlty Instrument Thrd. to pay tho III1OU\ts due to L-.d .. under P''''groph 2 aboy •• Fourth. to pay Interest due under the SeClIect Notes. Fifth. 10 pay def.,.red ..,terest due under the Secwed Notes, Sl)cth, to pay pnnc.,aI due under the Secured Notes, Last. to pay late dwges due under' the SeclW"ed Notes SDlMtO 10107 un-ttl AUt: onD 0" TIIIU,sT·"DJ e.IWEEKl Y P'9' • WA .... .-.... co = = ~ ..... c:> • CIt "" 0017564031 4. BOMOWEll'S OBLIOA TlON TO PAY CHARGES, ASSESSMENTS AND CI.AIMS I will pay all wes, assessments and any other charges and fnus that IN.,. be IMpOsed on tho Property and tNt ""'V b. 'uperJOt' to thIS Secur~y Instrument I WIU olao mlko poyments u ..-my lease If I ... 0 Ionan! on the Proparty and I Win pay ground ronts ~I onyI duo on tho Property I WII pay those amounts _ by mai<ong th. payments to Lendoor that •• doscrlbed .. Par"ll"lflh 2 obov. or by makmg the payments on tJrne to the Person owed them Any cIoIm, demand 0< charge tI1at IS modo agaonst property bOCOU&8 .... obl<gabon has not _ fUIII~ IS known as • lien I WIN pron.,"y pay or .-fy .. loons ~ th. Property that may be .....,.,or to tt.. Sec:U'lty Instn.mont _. ".. s.ar~ Ins1nment does not ro"",o me to satisfy • __ Ioen .f CAl I _ .. wromg, 10 pay tho obIogobon __ ro .. to the .uper ... loon and Londor __ .. ""'otong the _ .. which I "11"" to pay hi obIogoIIco. or IBI ., good f.th, I __ or doland --"'t tho ..,.... _ "' • IawJUt 10 111M. <Uong tho law .... tho __ """ may not be onlorcod and no part of th. Property muot be govon ..... or ICJ I _. from tho holder of !hoi other _ on "11" __ ovod on wr~ by L ..... !hoi tho loon of .... Security Inl~ ............ 10 tho .... hold by ",. Person If Londor de_ \hot ""Y pa-t of tho Property IS .... jOCt to • __ lien. Londor ...,. goy. to me 0 nolJe .. odontofyong tho _lOr hen I Wli PlY or ..... tv tho .......... hen or tako one or more of tho _ At forth above Within 10 do\'I of the _ of .....,. 5, BOIIROI'IER'S 08UGA TlON TO MAINTAIN INSURANCE At my .... c_ ..... ___ I WIll ob_ and ....-. hazard ",..,.,.,. 10 covor oJ! buoIdInp and other tmp"ov ...... ts !hoi now oro or .. tho futu"o MI be Iocatod on the Property Tho ............ must cover IoIoa or .-.-c..-by In. _ds normoIIy covwlld by -._ cover .... • _d ...... onco poIocoM and other _ for ........ Lender ___ c~ Tho INU'IIICe must be on 1he ..........ts and lor tho ponodo of tome r_1Id by Lender I may _ tho .,..,...,. "'"._., but my cIIooc ••• _}OCt 10 L_. _"""' lender may not refuse 10 __ my _ ..-tho r_ .. rouonablo All of _ .....---po-. and ,."wlll of tho ..-must _ _ .. known .. 0 _d .... S .. • CI_ 10 protect Lendoor _ form 01 • pohC .. , end r~ ft'RIat be K elf , ...... to lAIndw lM'der WI. twv. tN r-oM to hold 1M poIIaM --' r.-.wal. If L.-.dIr requw.s. , Wli prOf'T1)tty QIIve lender .. rtteelpts of ". p" .......... r..-..wlll notlc .. !hit I recetV8 If , obt.n ar1hqu.. II'I$U'JfICIIr .,)' other ~d .,sur..-.;e. UQ' hf. indiO( c:lsablrty IOIUI"WICe. or .n, other NU".nce on or ret.tJng 10 the Property Of'" the Saa.red No... and whodo .... nol spoctlocoly requored by Londor. I will nomo Lon_ .. Iou pay.. of ""Y proceeds II _ .... loss or __ 10 tho Property. I will prompHV nobly the propar tnSur.-.ce con'1f*'Y ~ lender If I do oot promptly prove to the InS\.rW1C8 C:OI'I'IpaI"I' h' the lou or dM\agIt oceurr'ed. then lendet' I'I\Iy dO $0 The amou'It paid bY' the tn"'.-.co complnY IS called "Procseds" Any Proceeds received 'NIII be IPPlted f .. st to """"'5. Lend..-for CORS .-.d .~I Incund III connactoon With obtMwog the Procoods. and then. lit Lander'. opbon II\d .. tho order and proportion as lender ll'\8y cfeta"mne In Its sote .-M1 &solute dlscre1Jon. regarcltss of Mly tmpamltNlt Of" lack of ~t of security. as follows LA) to the eKWrt allowed by appltcable law. to the Sum!! Seared In • ",.",...... that lender detrrmnes and/or (8, to the ~t of costs and expenses of necus..-y repatrs pr to the reston'bon of 'the Propert~ to a condrtlon satisfactory to Lender, such IPPhcatton to be made In the mamer and at the times as datermtnsd bY' Lender If , at..KIon the Property or If I do not answer, wIthin 30 days. a notlCS from Lender stating that the Insurance company has offered to settle a c'-n,. Lander may conltCt the Pt'oc .. dI lender" rna'll UN the Proceeds to repair or restore the Property or 10 pav tho SIA'T1' Sec:U't>d The 30-day perIOd w,II beg., when the nonce IS g,von If ¥IV PrOCHtM: we used to reduce the amount of pr-IOClpai which I owe to Lander under the Secured Notes, thIt use Will not delay the due date or c:hinge the a~t of anv of rfft( biweekly p.yments undar the SeclI"ed Notes and ln1er Pa,..griphs 1 II"Id 2 above However, lender .ld I may a~8e In wntrtg to delays or changes DUD Of TI!U5T· ... 0J IIIIWUKl Y p, •• " 0-.... ... CI <:> <=> .... .... . "" • co ... 0017564031 If londor oc", •• tho Properly under P .. agraph 28 below. III of mv r9rt. n tho ...... ""'. poIK:1es WIll belong to Londor Also ... of my roglrts In "v proceed!o whch •• J»Id bec_ of d_ that oecu-red befor •• tho Property " acquored by lind..-or sold w~1 belong to Lend..-However. lender', r91tl "' tho •• proceeds w' not be greater 1han tile S<m.o S ..... ed ommedoatoly befora the Praporty IS acquored bV londor or sold If I an raquored by londor to prf premoums for mon9l9O ., .... ance. I WIll prf the prarntuns untd the req.w8RW\t for mortvage 1flSUI'"anc8 ends lCCordWlg to my written ogreemont WIth lender or ICCordong to lew II. BORROWER'S 08UGATION TO MAINTAIN Tl£ PROPERTY AND TO RUIll Nf'f LEASE OBI.JGA nONS I w' keep the Praporty ., good r_ I WIll not destroy or ~1I1y chang. the Praporty _ I WIll nol _ the Property to datanorol. I WIll keep and .......... tho Propwty n COli" I .~ wrth .,.,., 1Ut. or fed.... hazwdou. mIt8r". and haM'dous ..-laws I WIll not ..... __ ",....,flClLr. or store ..., hazardous ..-.aI. 0< haurdoYO waste on, .... or obout the Property I woP onderrntv. defend and hold hwmIe •• l .... and Its .,.,Ioy ... , offlC«s and drectors and thew successors from ar/If clwns. dill • ..,.. 01'" costa fOf' r .... ed or neceua")' rep..-or the rlfnOVlll of ~ctouJ waste 01' WIt other ~douI rNl«M dam If t do not own but am I tenant on tho property. I WIll fulf. my cblogoIJono Lfldor my _. I llso ._ that. If I ..,.,.. • tho f .. _ to the Property. my 1_ ......... and the I.e btl. WIll not """go o.nIeso londoor __ to tho merger n wrrtong 7. LENDER'S RIGHT TO PROTECT ITS RIGHTS IN Tl£ PIIOttiII '( II IAl I do not koep my promo.. and ogr.......u modo n the Searlty Instrument or a _. ncIudong ..... begno • IegoI procaedong _ moy SIIIII,f""Uy .fflOCl l_. rog/l1oo n tho Properly 1_ .. • IegoI PI oe .. d"11 In ~. In pr_. for c_ or to onforce laws or r~ .... L_ mI)f do and pay for _.. IS _..., to protKt tho l..--. roghb ., .... Property u..w-• octoono ,.,.,. _ ",PWIV .. coon. _ r_ attomoyS' f_ and onIenng on tho Praporty to "'*" ,... Londor _ goy. me .... _ before L_ ..., tilt. .,y of _. actJons ~ Landor mey Ilk. octoon ..-_ Pwogroph 7. londor does not __ to do so Any acbon lIkon by londor ..-d Pw'll"'flh 7. WIll not , ...... me from my obhgotoono Lfldor II .. s.c."ty Ino1n.mont , .... poy to l_ any ...,.,..,.. whch lender aciv"""s .... "" Plrogroph 7 WJth ."tarest. at the '"twIst rate In effect ~ the SlICU"ed M'>tes wtwch haw not -. potd I .... poy tho.. In'IOUIt$ to lender when lender send, me I notoc. requeamg that I do so mt.eat on eKh .-ncurt wdl beglf\ to accrue on the date th.t the wnou"1t IS advMced by l.nder .tQvw ....... lender and I ",.., ... In writinG to twms !hoi .... different from tho .. "' II .. P"ogroph 7 ThIs s-.nty -....-t wol protoct Lender 1ft case I do not keep this prorTlSe to paV those lI'nOU'lts wtIh .,ferest 8 LENlER'S RIGHT TO INSPECT THE PROPERTY Lender. .-.d oChers arthOf''lZed by Lender. may ant.. ~ .-rtO !n$peC1 thts Property They m.rst do so n a ,. .. onabIe matVler and at r.as~ time. Before Of" at the tme ., rtSpectJon '5 nwde. lender must give rna notice stetJ'lg • reasonable pwpose for tho nspsclJOn 9 AGRfEMENTS ABOUT GOVERNMENTAL TAKING OF THE "-ERTY I _ to lender III my roghts IAl to proceed_ of III _ds Of _<'-n. for dama~s rNUlbng from CondltmiltJon. Bmlnerrt: doman or other goyernmental liking of all 0< onV pert of the Property, and IB) to procoedo from a _ of III 0< lOy pwt of the Propwty tNt IS made to aVOid col"lderr'nWon, 8m4neM domar. or other govwnment takIng of the proJ)8rty All of those proceeds WIN be paid to Lendet If ,II of the Propw-ty IS Uken,. 1he proceeds will be UHd to reduce the Suns Seared If any of the proc.eds remain .fter the «nOunt that I owe to lender has been p8ld In 'uK. the rem8fnlng proceeds WI. b. pMd to me lHe.ts Lender Ind I ••• otherwls. III wnbng. If only • p.-t of the Property IS taken. Ihe .-nowlt that I owe to Lender Will be reduced only by tho amount of proceeds mutttpiled bV th, folloWIng fractIon (At the totid ImOU'tt of the Sums S.c .... ed Immediately before 1he taking. diVIded by lBI the filr market v~ of the: Property Immediately before the tailing The remainder" of the proceeds Will be paid to me DUO OJ TI'U5T· ... DJ alWlfltlY PI,. s WA • -co .... .... ,~ ... 0017SS4031 If I ~n tt. Property or .f I do not anawtr. Wlttwl 30 days, I notice from Londor ot.mg 1I1ot • govenmentol ."ll1onty has offored to mak. • paY"*'! or 10 _ • • eloom for .-..-.. Landor has "'" IU1honty to collect the proceed. l.endor may 1I1an use Ihe proceeda to repar or r.store the Property or to reduce the Stlns Seared The 3O-doy perIOd WIll begon when "'" nobeo os grven If "v proceeds .. e used to reduce the amount of pnncipal whfch lowe to lender under 1he S..,....d Not", tNt .... WIll not delay 1110 due dote or change 1110 _ of ony of my ~Iy poymont. ...-.d... 111. s-red Not •• and ",dor Paragraphs 1 a"Id 2 above However, lendar II'1d I may agree ... \/YI""lbng to delavs Of" chln9-s 10 CONTIHlIATlON Ot' IIORIIOWER'S OBLIGATIONS AND 0' LENDER'S RIGtfTS tAl __ I Obllgeelona Landor may _ • P ... .,.. who Iokos ovor my rogtrts and oblogobO .... MlJICI to 1110. s-rtty __ to dolly or to "'-1he IIITlOWrt of .. brN,"""y poY"*'II of prw>q>1I and ...... oat duo ...-.d... "'" s-red _ or \.ftdOr 1Ivs S...,...,ty Instn.ma1t. Even If lender _ Ihoa, __ , that P",,,,n ond I WIll bolll "'" bo fully obkgotod ....... 1110 S8CU'ed Notes ond ..-tho Secu1ty mm.-nt Londoi' may _ 1ho •• dolly_ or cNngo' for • Por..,., who _ 0_ my "lttts' Ind ~lS, ..,., If Land .. " r~ed not to do so Landw WIll not be reqwod '0 bnnsI • ..".. __ .uch • PIInI,," for not ~flllong obIogobont ""dot" .. S8CU'od Notes or ..... _ Secu1ty Instrument, ovon If Landor os roqueotocl to do so 181 ~. Rlslhta EvWI I' L.-.cIer does not .:ltwa_ or enforce .ny of Its nc;w. t..nder thIS S8CU'oty Inotn.mant or _ Iho ,-, Landor WI" &btl .... III of _ ngrts and may PIr'OM ~ .,force them 1ft dw futLr. Even If L ...... obt:IIns 1"t:III.r..-.c.. pap tax... or payl 0111.-doomo, _gel or ...,. ~ Iho Pr-'Y. Londor WIt __ .... "!TIt LndeI" P-.oph 28 below to __ !hoi I ..... _ f>I'IR*lI .. lui of .. omounto !hit I owe to Landor ..... 1he s-rod _ and _ this s...:."ty Ins1n.mont n OBLIGATIONS OF BORROIiWR AHD OF PERSONS TAKING OVER BORROWEft'S RIGHTS 011 OIUOA TIOHS My Person who Ioko. 0... my ngIrto or obIog.wtlOflS under tho s.c...ty h.-t WIll __ III 01 my rogh1s and WIll be ob"gllod to keep .. of '"I' pr~ ond • .....-• ..-'" _ Sec:uroty............ SonNrty, any PorIOn who tokes ovor Landor's rights or o~ ..-_ s.c...ty Inl"'-'l WIll "" .... of Landor'. rogh1s Ind woU be obhgoted to keep .. of Lender'_ .ooments ..-on tIlu Secu1ty hstnment If mor-e than one P.-1IOn SIp Cha S.c ..... rtV ln5tr.......-.t M BofroWW", eech of u.s II fully obIogated to keep III of Borr~s prO<rMM and obltgabons c_ "' this Seoslty Instrument Lender nwy enforc. l .... ' n~ meier thl' Security hstn.ment agInIt each of us rovtdudy or aga.lSl ~ of us tD98ther This rne..lS 1Nt '"V ontI of us may be requtred to p.oy III of tho Sum. 58CU'od 12. MAXI_ ~OAH CHARGES If the loan seared by ths Security Instrument IS subject to I law which sets maxrrn.m loan ctw-ges. .-.d that I8w IS flfllny Interpreted 90 that the nterest or other lOin eh8I"ges collected or to be collected In c:onl"lreCbon WIth the to.. exceed' permlttad limits, then W my 5uch loan ctw"ge sNll b. raclJced bV th* amooot "BCesS..., to reduce 1110 chargo 10 1110 pemutted Imt. and IBI any sums ah~y eol1octod from Borrower wtuch • .xc •• ded perrnt't8d hmrts Will be refl.nMd to Borrower La1der may chooSt to make ttllS r.f~ by redUCing the principal owed I.ndar the Seared Notes or by makmg a direct payment to Borrower If a reflnd reduces PrlJlC1p~, the rBCi.ctlOl'l Will b, treated as a partl.ll prepayment Without any prepayment charge under the Secured Notes t3 LEGlSLA TION AfFECTING LENOEIrS RIGHTS 11 • change In IPPltcable LIw would make l1Iny provIsIOn of 1he Sec\xed Notes or this SecLrlty Instrument unenforceable, Lender may require that I make mmedlate paymenl on full of all Sums Socurod by this S~Ity Instrument OEIO OF tmST-ADJ IIIWfEII:;l Y po ... 7 WA • ..... .e> • C> .... 0017664031 '''' NOTICES REOUliIED UNOBI 1lliS SECURITY INSTRUMENT Ally nobce tNt must b. goven 10 me under 1hts Security Instrument wIll bo gov,," by dellverong ~ or by lNlllng ~ by fnt clas. ,!,"II ....... applocoblo low re",,"81 use of _ther method The noOOe WI' be addr ••• ed to me It 13806 144TH AVENUE SE. RENTON. WA 91069 _ •••• -•••• -•••••••••••• A nonce WI. be IJIVWl to me at an altemabve address If I 9Ive L.ender • nobce of my oIternobYO _... I may do.ognete only one ...... hng __ .t • !.me for nobllCltlon purpose. Ally 110_ that must be spen to Lender .-thoa Securrty InsIn.ment will be gNOI1 by milling rt by lorat cI ... mool to Landor'. _ ••• _oil "' Sectoon IICI obov. _Uttd. -Oof"""""" 01 Word, U.od In nll. Oeed of Trust: unle.. lender goves me nobce of • Off.-ant address Arty nobee requlf'ttd by hs Seanty Instrument it 9IVIin wh.... rt It milled 01' when it II dell'V«"ed according to til. r~nts of this Paragraph 14 or of appllcablo low 15. GOVEIINWIO LAW, SEVEIIABIUTY TIH_ s-.tty' "-'""-ond .... S ...... od _ oM'l be IICIvwned by end con ........ _ 1_.. 1_ ond ,-.. ...... ond r_.lItlono oncllllllng Iho .. for 1_."." ch_od IIOYInp lnolltubon." co.1ed ''Fe'"'' t.w." In tho -' that any of tile larms or prOVlSO>S 01 thos Sectnty InstnnIont or tho Securod Notoo are nterpratod Of' conttrued by , court of competent ,...tsdtcbon to be vC»d,. 1flV'*I or ..... fot'ceabl' •• ....n .docollOn shaI oHM:! only thos. provISIOnS so 0C<1SInuecI or onterprortad snd ".. no! .ffect tho r_ prOVl ....... 01 thos Securrty IMIrumw1t or the SeQ.red NoI .. Ie. IORRO/"BC S copy I ocknowIodge the roc""" of a.... conformod copy of .... Socurod Nolo. snd of 1hts Secunty __ 17 L.SCIEII'S IIImfTS TO RENTAl I'AYJen'S NG TO TAKE I'OSSESSIOH Of lH! nuselv If londlr __ os _Ito poymont ., lui or If I &a>don tho Propwty. \loon Londor. Psorsono __ by Ltndor. 0< 0 r-.or __ by • court at ~ • ,_t ...., !AI collect tt. rental poyments. onc:btIng __ , ...... poyments. doroctIy from thI '*-'*' a. enter ~ Iftd tIb pOll f ,of the Property, lQ ~ 1M Property. ond III 19\ _ and cIwIgoo r .... taI ago .. ,arts __ If lender noW ... tho tonanto _ ~ two tho nstrt to ~ rarrtal _to ciroctfy from _ under thoo Paragraph J 7. I agr.. _ .... _ "'"' make tho.. ronlal poymOI1to to L..-.dor WIthout hsVIng to .. /Jj ~ _ I havo foolod to keep my pr~ oM .greemenl!i lnia" thes s.eunty Ins1:n.ment. ~ InI me for my perTrMtllOh to do ao If lender .::b: to twv. the Property sold .fter ,. Breach 01 0Utv as def~ If! Paragraph 28. I _otand ond OVOO that IA) my rIght \0 ~y tho Property c ..... 01 tho lime tho Property .. ooIQ. IBI I _ t.v_ no r9rt to ~y tho Property altar JUCh sal. without tho wntton consent of tho now 0_ of tho Property. and ICI my wrongful and lIlIowtul po ..... 1On of the Prop«ty may -JOCI me to monetary ,,",,-s. mc:IudIng tho 10.. of reasonable ront and !he cost of oVlCbon All rontoI p.ym.nb coloctod by Landor 0< by a roc..vor. other than tho rent paod by mo under thIS Paragraph J 7. woI be UIIod Int to pay tho coots 01 collectong rentol payrnento and of manag"'" tho Pr-'Y It sny part 01 the r .. taI psyments r .......... 'ter tho .. costs hove been pad .. full. tho r.-nlng part wol be usod \0 reduce tho s.m. Secured Tho costs of rnanagr.g the Property I'nIV Include the rl!lC8MW"'s fees, rusonaiJlf!II attorneys' fees and the costs of lI'ty necessry bonds 18 INJURY TO "-ERTY; ASSIGNMENT Of RIGlfTS Nt uslgnrMnl I' • tr.uf.,. of nstrts to .ng1her I may hive ngrts to -brng ,.., actIon ~ "...on.-. othor than Lender. to< "'JI'Y 0< .-.-10 tile Property c< .. connection Wtth 1he Joan made to me by Lerndw and v.t»ch .0., Of w~1 an •• b.fOl'"e or .ffer the date of this Seo..nty InItn.ment The.. rights to bring legal acbon may Incb::te an actton for brNCh of contract. fraud, concealment of ,. mstarlSf fact or for ntentJONl or negligent acta I aaagn these n",ts, Mel any proceeds rISing from eMs, rights, IS perlTl1tted by IppItclbte IIW, to lender La'ldeJ" may. at Its opbon. enforce lhase rlgnts In rt. own nome and "'"' apply any proceeds resulbng from tho. ""gnmanI to "'y ........" that I may owe to Lender Ln:ter the Not. a-ld this SecurJtV Instrl.l"lWJt aftar dedJchn9 any expensn, Includrng attorneys' faas, IncUffed In enforcIf1g the.s8 rl\1'ts At the re<:pJe1t of Lander. I wtll $I"" any further ass.gM'lents or other doClKnents that may be necess .. y to enforce thIS ISStgnment DIED OF TAV$T'A,OJ BrWEEKl Y P.,. • w. .... co .-.... • \ ~i 001756"'031 19. Cl.ERlCAL ERRORS In 111, evant Linder II "v lime d,scov.... that _ Searoty InstNnont. 1he S.ctred NoleS or ony olhor docum.,,' rotated ,to 1ht. I",", coiled collect_IV 1110 ·La.. Doa.ments: c:ont.m ., fMTOf whtCn was caused by .. c~ncal mIStake, cak:ulatton error, computer error. prentmg error or 5tm11ar error. I •••. \.PO" notIC. from Lender. to ,.execut. any L.oW'I 00c:\ment!I that are necesa.y to correct .-,y such error!s) Irld I .so .... 1hII I WIll not hold Lender '0.".,,,,11>1. for ony damage to me whoch ""'V ,eNt from ony such error 20, LOST. STOLEN OR MUTILATED DOCUMENTS If ony of 1he Loan Doa.ments .... lost. .-.. mutllotod or dewoVed 0I\d LIIIlder _ .... to .... on mdo"""fOCOllOn ., mv fwor. "11'*1 bV L ....... then I .wi "11' 0I\d delrv .. to ~ .. Loan Oocwnent ,dentM;;aI " fO(m .nd content which 'MIl hwe the effoct of the ongmoI for .. p"pOOO8 21 WAIVER OF STATUTE Of LIMITATIONS I WIll WIIVtI. wrthln appIM trw ~. the ~ of the ItatJte of hlTlttatlons as a d.f ..... to Mfcrc. this S ..... rty Instrumonl. IIlCbIIng ""V obbgobons ,eferred '0 n 1hts SllCU'rty Inotrument or Secured Notes 22 CAI'11ONS The copbons ond hesdongo .. the '-..... of osch I*'vlPh 01 ttu Sea.rJty Instr...-oro 10< 'of or...". only and WIll not be used n 1110 ntorprotallon of ony prOVlIJOl"l of ttu Secunty InsCn.ment 23 MOOI'ICATION n.. SllCU'oty Inotnnwl, nwy be modofoed 0< ...,..-aNy by on ogreM1Olll n wnmg ......... by Borrower 0I\d LIIIlder l_ nwy modotv 1110 SllCU'oty Ino1n.nw1t and the soared Notes It Lender's __ .. 1110 ..... _ I '-f.led '" moke mv -tv ~ n 1hto ........ sot fO<1h ., 1110 Secwed No... In the ....,.. of • modI_ '0 """""tv _ii .... Landor _ ..-. the t.m .....".,.,., ""'"'"""" It lOCh potnI !hot 1110 him> -tv poymorot" _. n _ SOCtroty """'"'-t :u COltlXl __ • COOP!RA TIYE AND P\NINED UNT DEVEl.IlI'WNT OIUGATIONS If 1110 Propoor1y IS • '"' n 0 ~ c:oop«lIIV1I or p_ '"' _~ uch of·wI>och _ be .,.Iad tho "Pn»act.. 0I\d I hove on _oat on 1110 CDITWTJOr1 elements of the ProJK:t. then Lender Ind I agree that CAl If., owners iUSOCIatlon or other .-rutv. called -awn.r .. Assocr.non: hotels _ to Property fo< 1110 bonof~ or .... of tho ProjeCt and lis member. or __ •• 1hto Proporty 0100 __ mv '-.st In the Owner. A$$OC,"",," ond the ....... proceeds and bereftta of my merest IBI The folloWIng .... called 1hto "eonntu.rt Do"""*"'" 1>1 The de_n or ""Y olhw doc:1.oTart wI'och creotad !he PrOlocl ... Bv-Iaws of It. Owners AosocIotJon. (,," Coda of '''IJ'Iobons for tho Prolact. (Iv! ArtIcle. of ncorporlllOn. trust nstrumerrt or equwaIInt docoo'wwd which creataa the OWfW'S ASSOCiation, M The ProJect's eovenM'lts, COfldob"", _ ,utrlcbons. IInI Other equvalent doa.merl •• I sholl perform .. of mv obhgoIJon. under 1110 CoI\strtuont Documents. IflCIudIr>g mv obIIgoIIon '0 p"v. when M. all ,.. and assessments If I do no' pay 1he o..s and assesll'Mnts when due. Lender" may. • fts optJon. PlY them I W*I pay to lender any a-nounts which Lender advances lRfar thiS Pan~1Ph 24 according to the term. de.cnbed tn P"vaph 7 above - fa tf 1M Owner. Assoaaboo ma~ wrth In 1O$, ... nC:I eol'1'lJ*1Y reaOfVlbly ac::cepllble to lender, I muter or blank_t pohcy on the Pro,.ct: which IS swsfactory to lender and wtllch provld.s tnlLrlhCe COVII'ao-on the tel'TM. rn the amounts, ror the paned.. ond agalllSt !he hazards Lander ro~... ncluclng fn 0I\d h ... d. Included wlthn tho term "extended coverage,· and lender .s provtded With 8'V'ldance of such muter or blanket polICY. then (II Lend ... WINO the prOYls.an In Pwagriph 2el .oOV8 fo, 111. p.VmerK '0 Larder of the osIImaIed V .... ,y prOlTi .... ",,",Iments for h ... d ,"""lIflCe on the Property • .,d \III hlza'"d 'nsur~e coverage on h Property IS required by Pa"g-aph 5 above IS deemed to be ..... f'od '0 1110 ext.nt that 1110 requorod coverage IS prOVided by the Owners Assocllbon poliCY I shd gtve Lender prompt nobc. of illy laps. In the required hazard InSlranee coverage I shall prOVide I copy of such m •• t ... or blank.t policy to Lend. arY"II.JaIly 500411 101 O} "/1-") ..... -.1 DEED Of UNST-,a,O-.I 81W1iEltLY P ••• t • • 0017554031 In the event of a drstnbuttOn of hI:r.d lI'\SWance proceeds In hau of reltCJtltJon or repM' following • toss to the Property. whether to the l.nt or to common ol.",.nto. Illy ",oceeds p.y..,lo to me .ere herebV "''lJ"'Id _ _ be p.d 10 Lender for apphcabon to the s..ms SOCITod by Ihto S.cvr~y "'"trument wrth Iny oxcess pood to .... I shall take such acl!0IlS .. may be reasonable 10 .,..... _ tho Owners AsooaoboI. maon\aons I pubhc 1 .... 1oty .n......,c. polocy ICceptable to lend.-.. for", .-nount .-ad extent of coverege III I _ not ox"",,1 of .... nolo<» 10 L..-. _ W11h lendor'. ",ocr wntten consent _ partmon or _ the Property or 00Fl...t 10 W tho IbIndorment or t .. n.-.on of the ProJect,. except for JibanciOhfTI8ld or tar"nuNtIon reqLllred by law III the caM of ~ destruction by fn or other cauMty cr In the case of coud ... tatIOl'\ .....-__ or 0.... govw.....ul IIIunIJ \III any .......mont 10 "., "'~on of Constr\uonI Doc:un.u ........ the "'~ .. for the .xpr... bonef'l of lendor or of -. _"y. I"" .......... 1Ion of "'of .... ONI ___ _ --.moo of ~nt of the Ownero As_Of\. or 1M InY ocbon _ would '-the .ffoct of rondor"'ll the ..-tor or bin" -.rd ...... once pohcy indio. the poA>toc ~ ~ ....... once coverage ...... taoned by the Owners Assoaollon o.nocc~ to landor .... ~ 25 RlT\JIIE ADVANCES "" At Borrower'. rO<JlUf. lender. at 1\0 opllon IbuI befor8 rel_8 of II ... Socunty ..... Instn.rnont or the hA roc"' ...... "e. of the PToporty _ .. the Secu1ty-...- moy lend fuIur. odv"""s. W11h _OIl 10 Borrower Such tutu-. odvoncos. wI1h __ _ __ 1hon be _ s...... Socured ..-_ S.cumy instnJmenl C> LENDBI'S RIGHTS If TIE PROPERTY IS SOlD OR Lender may. 01 ,ts opIIcn. r ___ Socumy Instrument ,f .. or InY pert or " .." roghl .. .. Property. IS sold or .. ..,.ferred wrthouO LendW'. pnot' ~ lendet 1180 may, It ItI option. reqw'"e 1.11 S 1. ~ 1ft hM tf Borrow..-IS not a natunI Pwaon Ind • beneheMI Interest 11'1 Borrower .. _ or tnNferrod _ l_s ~ wntton 1*' ...... 00 _. l_ shall not _ •• ,,'_ poymont '" ful 'f ""s IS ",oI>brted bV _ol law .. 8ffoct on the _ of the Secumy Inotn.mont If lender exerelMS the option to r~re 1I1YnOdwt. pavment ., h.. Lender omR QIV8 me nobee of _abon If I fall to pay all s..mo Secured by "" SeQr~ 1nI.-...-t --V. lender moy then or lllere.tter """". wry r-' permottod by 1hs Secu1ty Instr\mInt Without hrther notice to or demInd on me If the sale or In Borrower. If Borroww I' not _ Parson. j.S fll"st one to occur after the date Qf ths Sec:u1ty Instrument. L.-.der WIt not eX.ClIe the opbon to accelerate payment In fu" of all S\.mo Secured _ the loan may be H.LmOd ,f II) Lender receIYe5 a completed wntten appIlCltlon from tr.,sfaree to ItvaUete the a'edrtworthlness of transferee at If a new Io.-t were being mad. to the tr.te, ..... bV L"'-. btl Lender iippf"ovus the endrtworthmen of 'the transferee '" Wftlll"'llJ. lilt trM'\SflM"H makes a cash downpayment suffiCient to meet Lender's then cwr.m ~ltJng standardl. ~v) an assumption fee. In lin nOt.nt to be deterrTWl8d by Lendllf" tbut not 10 exceed ,,. of the balance of pnncipal and merest due 1.J'1der the Secured Notes at the time of sa&e or transfar of the Property or of thIJ 1Ot.-.st 10 the Borrower) IS paid to L"-'._ M the transferee executes iYl asaITIptlon agreement which IS wisfactory to LM1der. such ass~tJon .",eement provuilng for trlWlsfere. openmg I deposrt ICCOU'It WIth lender. or With iI bank or S8VIf'I9' and loan which has been approved by lMlder. for direct payment ilS provided In the secured notes soo.tlJ 411 17 lIlt -II] .un DUO 0' T"U$T-ADJ lIIW£t:kl V ... ,. 10 • -.. c:> 0017554031 The loan may be uoumod under Its then ""ling torms and condttJonlo WIth one oxcepbon. tho lJleb"", Rata c.., may be chongod The LJle_ Rat. Cop shall bo changed to an ntarest rate wtvch IS the Stm Qf the Interest rate In effect on the dIte 01 • AI. or tr .. sl... 01 tho Pr~ or bonollCoaI ",terest "' Borrower pM 5 pore.... potnIs. .1 that """' ox.-.. tho lJlelmo Rat. Cap stated '" tho Secured Notes 27 SUISTIlVTlON OF TRUSTEE I ag-.o IhII Lender may ot WIV 1m. appoint •• ucc ... or trustee and !hot Porton sI-aIl become tho Trustee ..-tIos 5ecYnty Instnmont as .1 or.glNllly rwned as Trust .. 28 RIGHTS OF 111E lENDER If _ IS A BREACH OF DUTY " WIll bo ~ocI • "Br.ach of Duly" .1 III I do not pay tho lull ....,.... 01 __ biweekly __ 00'" data ~ ...... or h4 I fill 10 perform any 01 "'" "''''''' ... or agr_ ..-tie Nota or 1M s.ar.ty ~ or ~ any ._ ..-., my ~ to(' Un ..,., was ~ f.se Of" m' LV Of" If lOy st.t.rn.rt In my IPP.catH", for h. to.n was mItenIIy f .... or "..,lIdng by reason 0# my 00"1l$.IIOI1 of certaw'I filC'b. or M I hive made .." othw .t8ta •• 1t to ~ n COlW.a.ot. wrth 1tu loin that IS mat.naIy ,.. or ""11 ..... 19 If there IS • Bruch of Duty by me. Lender "..., ~ an .fii I t st. __ of .. SlmS seared If there IS • _ of Duty by mo. tie L"-may .... act"'" 10 hoYo tho Pr~ sold ..-any """" II F.d .... , Low. ruIo or r~ and. whore _01 Low IS not oppIoc_. under tho low of the ._ whor. the Property IS locoted. which WIll b. eoIIod tho "ApplIcable Low" ~ does not have to _ ",. 110_ 01 • Br_ 01 Duty LflIesa noI.oce •• roqured by ~ t II lJow If Londor does not .-•• domond lor "'" paymom f4>0" a Br.och of Duly. londor may ........ domond 10< "'" payment """" any other Broach of Duty If there • a _ 01 Duty. Lender may IIso toll. _on 10 __ • r_ 'I'I""nt8d ..-tho ~ t.. to coIoct ront. from any -.. on .... F'r-'Y WId to ....--tho Property Tho _ to __ • rlCllv", may bo taken W"III>out "nor nobee to rna WId r_<l_ of Iho ...... 01 Iho Pr-'Y The sol. 01 tho ProPerty "'"' be poslponod by or st Iho dncbOn of l_ e'cept .. ,,,-or pr_bod by Iho Appl.cablo Law If tho Prgporty .. sold under the AppIIcabl. '--. I agr.. that II may be sold In one parcel I also agree _ Lender may _ 10 Iho amount \hat I owo to L_ .. logo! I.... costs. allowa><:eI. and lisbu"sements lnCUTed as • resuft of the actton to seI the Property. except to the oxtont that tho ~ Low Imts or prohibit. ony such chorga L_ wll apply the pr_ from Iho .... 01 the Property ., the folow"'9 order (A) to ... fees. 1xpa"MS .-.d costs n:uTed 1ft cornecbon WIth the s.~. 1nC\udng trustees' and attomoys' faos. .f WIV. ~ 10 all Suns Secured by It.. SOCU1Iy Inotrumonl. ancf (0 any 8XC8Sj 10 the Person or Person, legally entrtled to Jt 29. RECONVEY AHCE WIwI Lendor has been paod all """unls _ Lnder tn. S.cured No,,", and under ttu SearJty ~ Lender wll request Trustee to reconvey the Property and WIll daPlver thrs Secul"lty Instn.ment m the s.clled Notes to Trust .. TrUlt .. w.aJ' reconveV Iho Proparty w>1hoIrt _ronly to Iho Porsonlsl I.goly onbtled to II Such PorsonloJ WIll pay aN cost. If'ICU'Ted by L.,.. or Trustee relating to the delIVery of the Sueur-ad Notes and the S8CLJ"lty Instrument" the reconveyance and 1t5 recordation 30 ST A TEMEHT Of OBLIGATION To the .xtWlt .-owed by Ww r I wtll !}Ive lender I tee for fw-nlshlf"l9 "'v st.tement of obIlgitlon Wtth respect to hS SeclXrty Instrument 01' the Secured NotM 31. USE Of PROPERTY I wall not US8 the property fO( agnC\Jttural. bmba-or grazing P'lPoses S004U; to, 0] !~1-!t!!l AoIIl NED OF TAUST·,l,DJ IUWlEklY Pt,. II 0017664031 32. QUICK QUALIFYING LOAN PROGRAM I haw qualified for tho ..,., by mok"'ll _omenla of fact whICh were rolled """" by lender to approve tho loon rapidly ~ loan IS calloe! I "Qurck OuIhlV"'ll Loti'" I havo stated and I conf"'" tho! !AI I do not ..... ..., 01her QUick au.~fytng L.,.,. wl1h Landor, (II) I hoYe agrood to not further en","""", the Propertv and do not ntend to lur1her encunt>w the Property lor .t I ... t SIX months after tho ~t. of the S.ared No," and this Secunty Ins/nniont .".; 10 II I 1m pur",-tho Property. .. 01 the t .. ma of the pu-chase .,.eement submrtted to Lender are tn.Je IIld the entire down payment IS cash from "'" own flnJ. If .,., of the __ 01 loel 1hot I have mado ... ......,..IV f_ or /!'Illuding. I W1I be In dof.... ...... tho Sea.nd Noto, and tho Socu-rty Instn.mant If I am III such dofaM. L_ mer. ot lis OPtIOn. n:r .... the moroll rite Ind mar9O' .l.tJjOCI to the lI1.tJme _ Cop ltated II tho Secured Notes 33 OWNER OCCUPANCY Lender hoi rohed upon -..nts of llet whoch I ha.o made to CJIIIIIy lor II .. loan I haw stal8d and conI,"" IhIt !AI tho Property IS mV penonoI and prnwy r.-. ~ I w. occupy tho Property not law thin 30 dayl alter 1M Socum,. Ins1n.mont " rocordod. II'MI IQ I WIll us. tho Property as my r-". lor .. _ 12 _ from the dato _ Soctny Ntnmont " rooorded If .,., of tho __ of '''''' tho! I ...... made .... matenally I.. or mtlleodng. I WIll bo .. dofaUt ..-the Secuoe! Notes II'MI thll Socurlty Instnrnont II I om on such dol....... L_ ...,. .t lis optIOn. __ tho mor851 rota and marlin BUb,oct to tho lIf_ Rate cap _ .. tho Socu-ed Notes THIS SPACE IPO'ENTIONAlLY L.EI'T IIlAHK; SIGNATURE PAGE fOLLOWS. DUD 0' TIlJST'AOJ elWlElUY ,. ... 12 0017554031 BY SIGHING BELOW. I accept and avee to tho promISe. and ogreements contained In thIS Sea.rlty In.stnment and In any rtdertsJ signed bV rT'Ie and recorded WI proper 016a.1 rlll'Cords (pLEASE SIGH YOUR NAME EXACTLY AS IT APPEARS BELOW! BORROWERISI ISeajJ o ? ISeoit ISeoil (Sail (Seal) (Seal) ATTACH INDIVIDUAL NOTARY ACKNOWlEDGEMENT IUS NOTARY ONlY) AS A SEPARATE PAGE TO THIS DOCUMENT DfEO 0' T~U51'JlDJ I!tlwtU~ '( P_". U ol IJ STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNfY OF KING } .. I cerllCy IbaI I bow 0< have .. hSf'>ctory ovid""", that DIANE L. KAMPHAUS AND HENRY B. KAMPHAUS lsl_tbe pcrsous 'Nbc) appeared before me, and sud persont ad:t1O'tVltdged thai "tI.b~ 'Ipcd th" mstrwncnt I.IId acknowledged It!D be IuI.I1aa"lt.btIt>tJe.e and voluntary act for the uses and ptUJlOScs mentwned In dns IDSmuneut D,Io<! 'f/rID~ , -. " " , .. '!r. . I .. .. .' .... ~ .. "1 " ", _, \. " , ",11 .. ,~ t • -, ... JUlES '"' ,- I ,.:.;r..J . ~ -. ..... Notary Pubhc JP. and for the S .. Ic: ofW:u.bLnltou Reaq It f,EtJt..,,..) My IJIPOlI!tment exptres ">1,.,/05. lPB·ll • -- WORLD SAVWGS E X H I BIT "AO LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOAN NO. __ -"O",OC!1",76",UO=",3.!.-' ___ _ AU TliJ\T CERTAIN FEAL PROPERTY SIlUAlED IN Tl£ COUIITY OF KING STATE OF WASHINGTON • • • •• • 0ESCRIBBl AS FOLLOWS Tract J::'. BLACK LOAM rIve JlCRt. TRJ\CTS. (Ie-cordIng to the ploat thereof recorded ]n VolUIIMI 12 of Plate:. page 101, Jon Kl.ng County, Wash.1.n9t.on ~ Situate In thl! county of Kl.ng. St.:.te of Washington .... • c:> .0::> .... l'~V aFnOAl102 15 01/H)I) IIJOC WA I &l 2 't: " is ~ , ~ '" '" " go ~ ~ " ~~ 1i..;: Co" ~~ ~ u ~i2 ~;;; "," ~~ "'''i t:1& " u ~'" ~~ ~8 " !e Gjl "-~'i2 "-iO; ~" .;,:<3 ~~ ,,"-z:~ ""' ~" "'Oi ,<<tl c , 0,,- "'"' ~~ ~8 II I I I / -----~ ------.---=:::-=::::: L ,--- I I I 1 / -- TRACT B -Proposed ---, --l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . J R200' __ -'-------== c-- 25' ? (~~) ,-') 'ji10'ji1 1-1 I I I 1 \ --_t \ %& ~.:s "". TRACT A Open Space 11448 SF \ \ ~.:~:-~'. ..."~~:.,,J-~ .~J .. ~ ~~b ,,~'''. • ',.:.:: .. '~.-~.,~~ .. ~~. .~ Open space/ Area for 1498 SF I Project Signage -/ r pro~o+d WalkLua~(T::JP)\ i . I R200' , :/>. ---_._--I'.) EXiSt1!19 vegetation (T::Jp) \ _ _~_ ~ _____ _ ~~-~~~~~~~~~~ « \! i I\'V~& I X~.:s \ K' \ 0, . . '\--' ~. ............ -.. ,,< ~·;'"\.Ji \\ ", \ , \ , [I \.. .\\ . , : ... . "'--~ .. . ~ \ " \ /~, ,I rr""", / \. , .. 25' S~tbacOiom st(eanF{Typ~}- '-----Existing Wetl;pld See .. " ." ;f~-J2 ~~Jlatld Report \'''--'-';J~J ,_0 "'-v/' ,/ ""'" """, 1 I 1--------7-1 I I I I I I 20' Garage : Setback line RMC I 4-2-110D.13 (T::Jp.) I 31 8091 SF I .{ I I I f L __ _ -----------.r--- I I I I I I I I J <. ._ .. _' I I 1 1- ~7 -@- SCALE: 1" = 2fY .. " ; I C:-.' \"J, L_-'f-J 10 2006 TRIAD ASSOCIATE l~ .,.. 1211211.,kte. NE -~-....., ..... ~-.. -~---I- ).. ~~ I-. ~ -~ ~~ ~ ~(,) ).. e: <:> :t).. ffi ~::t ~fI) 0 ; ! i 1 1 , ! , " ~ ~ ~ ~I I~ ~<J(]<!<J<]<j(J< -.t_1JCSIW PROJECT IWt!GD I«XA. ~ I'U PBiiJiCTSlIMroa ~,,~~ PlIIIJlCf "'_ PIilliCT JJ.NDSCAPI i\ltBliiCT nISI' SUBIlJ1T '" 1I.f.11: CIIJ,t2J;1:lrf 0Ci.LI: I0Il1.: 1"-2(/ .... ~ STAlO' NOT YillD UNlISS stGMID !NIl DATIIl ...... 03-185 """",.,. 1., 1 ; = Shy Creek Development City of Renton Level One Downstream Analysis Prepared for Conner Homes Triad Job No. 03-185 ( Shy Creek Development City of Renton DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JAN 272006 Level One Downstream Analysis RECEIVED Prepared for Conner Homes Triad Job No. 03-185 Shy Creek -Level 1 Downstream Analysis Shy Creek LEVEL 1 DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS Prepared By: King County, Washington City of Renton Prepared for: Conner Homes 846 108 th Avenue NE Bellevue, Washington 98004 Kristen Anderson, E.I.T. Reviewed By: Michael A. Moody, P.E. January 12, 2006 Job #03-185 Shy Creek -Level 1 Downstream Analysis Table of Contents 1 Task 1 Study Area Definition and Maps ....................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Study Area ........................................................................................................................ 1-2 2 Task 2: Resource Review .............................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Sensitive Areas Folio ...................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 King County Basin Reconnaissance Program ............................................................. 2-1 2.3 Soils Survey for the King County Area ......................................................................... 2-1 2.4 King County Community Planning Area ....................................................................... 2-2 2.5 Geotechnical Investigation ............................................................................................. 2-2 2.6 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) ....................................................... 2-2 2.7 King County Wetland Inventory .................................. ; .................................................. 2-2 3 Task 3 & 4 Field Inspection & Drainage System .......................................... 3-1 Description and Problem Descriptions ............................................................... 3-1 3.1 Existing Site Conditions ....................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Onsite Drainage ............................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Upstream Basin ............................................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Downstream Drainage Description ................................................................................ 3-2 3.4 Downstream Drainage Problems ................................................................................... 3-2 4 Task 5: Mitigation of Existing or Potential Problems .................................. 4-1 4. 1 Drainage Concept ............................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 Specific Problem Mitigation ............................................................................................ 4-1 Section 1 TlR Worl<sheet Section 2 Sensitive Areas Maps U.S. SCS Soils Map Soils Survey Legend King County Communtiy Planning Areas Newcastle Area Zoning Map King County DfBinege BaSins Map King County Parcel Viewer Map King County iMap 1 Mile Radius Aerial Photo FEMA l()().year Floodplain Map Table 3.2.28 (1998 KGSWDM) Section 3 Section 4 Upstmam Tributary Map North Onsite Existing Cond"ions Exhibit South Onsite Exisbng Conditions ExhiM Shy Creek Downstream path iMAP KG WLRD Complaint Search List Complaint Map KG WLRD Complaints Received Topozone Topographic ExhiM Off-Site Analysis Drainage System Table List of Figures Developed Condft;ons and Conceptual Outfall Exhibit January 12, 2006 Job #03-185 ITIlliw Shy Creek -Level 1 Downstream Analysis 1 Task 1 Study Area Definition and Maps 1.1 Introduction The project proposes to create 61 single-family lots including open space, recreation and detention tracts on a 16.14 acre property. The site is bounded north-south by NE 2nd Street (a.k.a. SE 132nd Street) and SE 2nd Street (a.k.a. SE l36th Street), and east-west by 142 nd Avenue SE and 144'h Avenue SE (a.k.a. Jericho Avenue). In general, the site lies within Section IS, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington. The location ofthis site is within the recently annexed portion of the City of Renton. The Vicinity Map below shows the general location of the site. This Level I Downstream Analysis describes drainage to and from the site per Tasks 1-5 (Page 2-10 through 2-13) of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). October 25, 2005 Job #03-185 I I- I I I TO /-405 I • ,- i C ,--- i ' I '"T-' I ., I , i I '-~'<-"~'"'7, ,'. J,' I ! I I Vicinity Map Not to Scale , I ,! i :' I <{I ~~'I \;.'; \:1 ,,' "': "10 1 ;;i' '" Page 1-1 Shy Creek -Level 1 Downstream Analysis A downstream site visit was performed on August 24, 2005, to observe the upstream and downstream drainage conditions. The following analysis is based on this site visit and related research of available records. 1.2 Study Area The study area, per Tasks 1 & 2 (Definition, Maps and Resource Review), will extend up to 1 mile downstream of the site. A one mile radius from the site is shown on the King County iMAP (printed 6116105) available at the end of this section. The general shape and corresponing parcel numbers can be viewed on the King County Parcel Viewer Map located at the end of this section. The site is nearly rectangular in shape, excluding an irregular shape in the northeast corner containing parcels 0847100105, 0847100106, and 0847100107. The proposed site includes three separate parcels: 0847100108, 0847100115, and 0847100140. The upstream offsite basin is approximately 252 acres composed of areas that are east and north of the site. As required, the upstream limit goes far enough to preclude any backwater effects from this project. Onsite runoff that is north of the creek flows southwest as evident by the site's topography. The south half of the site contains some runoff that flows to the west and some runoff that flows to the east. All onsile runoff sheet flows to the onsite creek and is released to the natural drainage path commonly called Maplewood Creek that leads to the Cedar River. Please see the aerial photo at the end ofthis section. The downstream oflsite analysis extends to the Maplewood Creek beyond 148 th Avenue SE and SE 142 nd St. Per Tasks 3, 4, and 5, the downstream study area is only required to extend to the quarter-mile point located within the Maplewood Creek (as shown on the North and South Onsite Existing Conditions Exhibits (available at the end of section 2) or a location where the project site area is less than 15% of total tributary drainage area to the quarter-mile point. October 25, 2005 Job #03-185 Page 1-2 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Project Owner: Conner Development. L. P. Address: 846-108th Ave NE Suite 202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: (425) 823-1955 Project Engineer: Micheal A. Moody, PE Company: Triad Associates Address/Phone: (425) 821-8448 Part3 T'i'PIO 01= PERMit' APPLICATION ", " ',' X Subdivison 0 Short Subdivision 0 Grading 0 Commercial 0 Other Community: Newcastle Drainage Basin: ,:' , 1~~~2PROJECT'LOCATION AND. DESCRIPTION Project Name: Shy Creek location: Township: 23 N Range: 5 E Section: 15 Part 4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS o DFW HPA 0 Shoreline Management o COE 404 0 Rockery o DOE Dam Safety 0 Structural Vaults o FEMA Floodplain 0 Other o COE Wetlands , , Lower Cedar River River Sub-basin of Cedar River Sub-basin DRiver X Stream 0 Critical Stream Reach 0 Depressions/Swales 0 lake 0 Steep Slopes Part'( SOilS Soil Type AgC Slopes 2-15% 0 Floodplain 0 Wetlands 0 Seeps/Springs 0 High Groundwater Table 0 Groundwater Recharge 0 Other Erosion Potential Erosive Velcoties o Additional Sheets Attached REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT o Ch. 4 -Downstream Analysis [J o o o o o Additional Sheets Attached Part 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION X Sedimentation Facilities X Stabilized Construction Entrance X Perimeter Runoff Control X Clearing and Graing Restrictions X Cover Practices X Construction Sequence X Other MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION X Stabilize Exposed Surface X Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities X Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris X Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities X Flag Limits of SAO and open space preservation areas 0 Other J J .. " Part 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM. ., .. ' ". D Grass Lined D Tank D Infiltration Method of Analysis Channel D D KCRTS Level 2 Vault Depression X Pipe System D D CompensationlMitigation Energy Flow Dispersal of Eliminated Site D Open Channel Dissapator D Storage Waiver D Dry Pond D Wetland D Regional X Wet Pond D Stream Detention Brief Description of System Operation: Level 2 KCRTS detention pond with basic water quality wetpond. Facility Related Site Limitations Reference Facility Limitation Part 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS .,. '" ,., . Part 12 EASEMENTSITRACTS . . . .' , D Cast in Place Vault X Drainage Easement D Retaining Wall D Access Easement D Rockery > 4' High D Native Growth Protection Easement D Structural on Steep Slope X Tract D Other D Other Part 1.3 SIGNATURE OF PRPFE$SIONAl ENGINEER : ',," .. '"I .... ,.: ........' ' ••• 1"" " .' . I or a civil engineer under my supervision my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. ALi £6<ne&Date /-If-O & 7 (i Shy Creek -Level 1 Downstream Analysis 2 Task 2: Resource Review Available maps and resources included for the following Resource Review are: Sensitive Areas Folio Lower Cedar River Basin Map King County Basin Reconnaissance Program King County Soils Survey King County Community Planning Areas (May 1985) Geotechnical Investigation FEMA 100-year Floodplain Map (September 12, 1978) King County Wetlands Inventory Drainage Complaints on file at King County Records Division Other Offsite Analysis Reports (more specifically, Sienna Level I Downstream Analysis- dated 8/11200 I and Shamrock Level I Downstream Analysis-dated 11112004. 2.1 Sensitive Areas Folio Maps from the King County Sensitive Areas Folio (December 1990) show that the site is not in a sensitive area with regard to seismic hazards, coal mine hazards, erosion hazards, wetlands or 100-year floodplains. However, the 100-year floodplain for the onsite stream has been modeled using HEC-RAS by Montgomery Water Group. Please see the included report (dated January 11, 2006) at the end of Section 4. The stream currently does not contain salmonid. 2.2 King County Basin Reconnaissance Program According to the King County Basin Reconnaissance Program Summary (Vol. 2), the site is located within the Lower Cedar River Sub-basin of the Cedar River Drainage Basin (see King County Drainage Basins Map located at the end of this section). 2.3 Soils Survey for the King County Area According to the King County Soils Survey Map and Legend available at the end of this section, the majority of the site is underlain with Alderwood soils (AgC). Table 3.2.2.B (See December 15, 2005 Job No. 03-185 Page 2-1 Shy Creek -Level 1 Downstream Analysis end of Section 2) of the 1998 KCSWDM classifies this type of soil in the SCS Hydrologic Soil Group C. 2.4 King County Community Planning Area The site is located within the Newcastle Community Planning Area as shown on the delineation of King County Community Planning Areas. 2.5 Geotechnicallnvestigation No Geotechnical investigations have been completed at this time. 2.6 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) According to the FEMA Map #530071 0350 A (dated September 29, 1978) the site is not located within a I DO-year floodplain. However, a I ~O-year floodplain for the onsite stream has been delineated by Montgomery Water Group and is included at the end of Section 4 of this report. 2.7 King County Wetland Inventory According to the King County Wetlands Inventory Maps there are no wetlands located onsite. December 15, 2005 Job No. 03-185 Page 2-2 lid additional mln- n ..... was Wed with :r Natural ne- T . l1at occur~ '~ , pre<:edcd . { deny tlle I cO" tUnnels. ..) t: J\/ 01 I I V r- Coal Mine Hazard Areas 1/ I' . . :. , Duwamish 4 ndslide haZard !!l;JPS jor I s.elsmic hdli!rrJ Jf~aS Ie! 'las ilrr ,u,,_flp,'lile f ~s. OUler C.I!lIn'l( t il 1'11$ [flaP dre . ~1'lne ·,cdlfr,"nl,., .Je fd C" 'j" r' f Seismic Hazard Areas Duwamish 4 Landslide Hazard Areas Duwamish 4 Iph1ns extend bt- Flood 111 ys show thl; )f qrtdnlS Ip/alns Streams and 100- Year Floodplains • ". • • .. Class 2 (with s.almonjds) Class 2 (perennial; salmonid use undetermined) ~ •• e _ Class 3 Unclassified Duwamish 4 Erosion I-Iazard Areas Duw<lmish 4 ~"--"~ • __ ~~"~\~'.JI ,~::",~Ij ""d.::a ......... ___ ' :........".xt:!'~m.:f\~j~~~ ............... '!1'~~<\tR"Mli :;."M~J,l.~-"' ..... .:;..-..... ~<~·"....,.".:·.-..--..-~&..,.---~"""".,...~ ::::; 8"':'<; .... =--=-=" U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGR I CU LTURE S OIL CONS ERV ATION S ERVICE InC S(,;<'l le 1 :21\ 000 2 Md e~ 1 = J 1.<. ~~1 0 _P::::::::::::;: j ~~ f E+"9 10000 F ~e l i t=:~ I ! 5000 50'fiJ t=14 000 3 000 2 0 60 100 0 a Th i s m ap IS o n e o f a s e t publ ished in 1972 as par t o f a so il survey by the U ni t ed St atf~s DCp iHtment of Agri c ulture, Soi l Con servatio n Sp.r vic e. and t he Wa sh i ngton Agr ic ultural Experimen t S t ut lo n I " ~ ",~tl'~ c n ~ 01 J ~e! o!;:>o .<; ~,: •.•.. ~. ,H f ~ ~i:;:E r,. V/A~)-r-l',' .);-! !'K\ 11 N SHEET NO. 11 KING COUNTY AREA, WASHINGTON (R E NTON QUADRA NGLE) Py Akf 18 0000 r EET -1 ;;r~~~O:}iO " A F'PRD XI MAlE NDi -r 0 ScALE Qrth op hotol>a se co mpil ed i f I 1970 b y USGS. Plan i me t r ic deta i l ob t a 'l lt-!d from U S GS 7Yz minu te se ries m aps Pol ycon i c pro je c t ion . 1927 Nor t h AmeriCon datu m. 10,000-foot grid b<lsed on Wa s hm gton coo r din<l t e sy s t enl, no r th 70ne GR2.5·P / ,. , Newcastle Area Zoning ... Histor ic Site (Id ent i fied by a P-suffix i n t he Area Zon ing) For more detai led informat ion refer to the Adopted Area Zoning document . I. I f, I . GR -2.5-P Q-M C,U.:ICAII 1.1 0v,...rA',... M Qi.."N/AiI'lO \ J .' , , / I I \ ! f I I -, " -; .... " I 1 Figure 2 DRAINAGE BASINS K ing Cou n t y 1985 Major Basin B o undary Sub-Basin Boundary Sour ce : King Count y S en si t ive A re as Map F o li o, W et lands Su p plement o 2 3 .. 5 I> 7 8 Mil es 2 1 : JOO ,OO O -.:, .- ~/""~ "'"lg \.-UUllly : rarcel v lewer map rrame I'age 1 01 1 ~5~_' 15~~ ,---, ~ mm00640 -I' II .J • li'i -I "'1 ND_3.' I r·'·'· .. ~'. . ~ ~"., ~l t CXX)6S 0041 10C('61 f I'~ 0041~OOl08 I"" " .. nt" '--I "" 100 ~ Ii, ps. 71()006.3 >-- j0847100 107 M41 1(;0()ii6 ~ "': ... ~,b ~ ~"~ M41 1000n 0047100080 ~~ .... "'" 'I 0001 ~ 0347 100015 084 7 1(.'(08 1 1815 ,.;;:, ~' /. . l: s t't E \ 1692 ~. " ? r----::::::::: .(ND T TO C/.4./1=;-0841100090 J , I N I 0041100140 I ~: "" .. .. iD~.· • If ":f~A'; lmos=M {C} 1,OOi;';, . ~" ;;8811 http://www5,metrokc.gov /parcelv iewer/Map Frame,hlm 10/3/2005 \, ®King County ~~ ~): TJH~ Bulfil! '-~ ~ Bufferuu Selec.l r':Ul Q fh om.'Hi Hro!ho~ M.ll.' r-'agij -County Boundary I _. Legend Pi'lf'..:;t:l<:; VVLRD CktJlfl ilQe C()m~Jta illl s 1'1 ("..orp'.HClletl .~nld Comments .1,,,9'- notice. makes no represen tations or warrant ies, express or implied, as 10 accuracy. GOmpletencss , timeliness, or rights to the use 01 such County sh a ll not be liable for any general , special, indirect, incidenta l, or consequential damages including, but not limited to , re-r er'u,,, or lost profils resui!ing from the use or misuse of the mforrnatlon con tamed on th is map. Any sale of th is map or information on I , , .' " By visi ting th i S and other Kmg Coun ty web pages. you ex p res sly C'I ~J r ee iO he b ou nd I)y te rms and .-:o ndltlons 01 the $lle . The uEJ.H~ .. J ~ TerraS e rve r Image C o urt esy of the USGS Page 1 of I Sen d To Pn nter Gad, ::J Ten aS r l'\:er S!10 W G r:d Lines Cnange tu Land sca pe Imacl<' C(lU rt lCW of lil C'y, Geo lo(j lcal Swvey 2 UU,) 1'I I(1"osuft Corp o r a ti on , Terms of Use Pri va cy Statement http llter rase rver m iCillSoflco lll J Pri nr l lll ag e as p x 'I T -,I8: S -I I & Z ~ I 08: X ~ 14()8& y ~ I I I ·16& 912 /2005 , ~ r , This mlp is for flood in~nnce purposes only; It d oes not n~ces · ~.1d l y show all areas sub j ect to Ooodlng i n the community or 41 11 planimetric feature ~ outsi d e special fl ood hazard area~. For adjoining map panels, see ~p.l(a t ely print ed Inde x To Map Panel s. For \ie sc ript io n of Elevation Referen ce Marks, sec pane l 53007 1 017,A I N I T I AL I DENTIF I CA TION JANUARY 17 ,1975 CONVERS I ON TO REGULAR PRO GRA M SEPT EM BE R 29, 1978 Refer to the CONVERSION TO REGULAR PROGRAM date sho wn o n this map t o det e r mine when ac tuarial rates app l y 10 structUfe'S in the .lones where e l rova lioll'> 0 1 depths have been estabhsh~tI. To de term ine it Ilood inw nnce is a .... ila blc in t h is community. conuel Y0l-If insurance ~e nt . or c aU the NoltionOl I Flood Insur- ance Program , at (800) 638-6620, or (800) 424 -8872. • APPRO X I MATE SCALE 2000 0 2000 FEET E""'3 E3 p:::::r: @ , '~\ , '-'----1 '-.-1 ,} , , I- '\ --'\---- \\ ~\ \ ,I . ..o~_ ".' --~-I!E:N1'"nN .. /~._- ._. __ ~-'-'--" _"",~ =;~~_J~'"- : J ~; I '~~~""~~ :_--,-,,-:-~_c, .,/ i, I: , ZOflJE C ~j t ~"T-~· --:1'"-"'-,.:\ '.",j ~:~-2t:::;~~ _____ ---- , \ , , -\ "' _.-" ..... -.-..<. I . " ---- ";";;/--' -:>' .;' j .,;<" ",,<,,:'~~ •. ~jU---=~~ ~;~] "- " .~ , 1 1""-'1 '~y .... /'~ U .! ) n , i: "'--'-'''-"'-=-~!; --" i ,0_~J \ ~l ,I , ., ii ' ZONE A I J ~ 'l -! "",:',;;--! ,. " )j ~ ~ f:--co-.; , ~ 11 II \. «(ig " \r \-..=.=-......... =--~. I' " , F I' I i: i -r ',[--I""''''' -"i'~--';)'-. ,-~~-~-",-,;"" I ' I ,_ .. 4'~ ,I \ '\l .;---- '\-, .; '\ I ., .. ,-.:-' .ZONE ..«'\ i '< • <:~-"-~'~ t<J\~;. . .,...-1. RM104 13 4 1 " .. ~,k;::.;'~ ... NATIONAL flOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM flOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON (UNINCORPORATED AREAS ) COMMUNITY·PANEl NUMBER 530071 0350 A PAGE 350 OF 650 (SeE MAP INDEX F O R PAGES N O T PR INTE D) EPTEMBER 29, 197B U.S, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION ZONE B . ;/" / } f .' .. ..,. .. --"'''''- 3.2.2 KCRTSIRUNOFF FILES METHOD-GENERATING TIME SERIES TABLE 3.2.2.B EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN SCS SOiL TYPES AND KCRTS SOIL TYPES '-"-.' SCS Soil Type SCS KCRTS Soil Notes Hydrologic Group Soil Group • Alderwood (AgB. AgC, AgO) C Till ...- Arents. Alderwood Material (AmB. AmC) C Till Aren!s. Everett Material (An) B Outwash 1 Beausite (BeC. BeD. BeF) C Till 2 Bellingham (Bh) 0 Till 3 Brisco! (Bd 0 Till 3 Buckley (Bu) 0 Till 4 Earlmon!{Ea) 0 Till 3 Edgewick (Ed) C Till 3 Everett (EvB. EvC. EvO. EwC) AlB Outwash 1 Indianola (InC. InA. InO) A Outwash 1 Kitsap (KpB. KpC. KpO) C Till Klaus (KsC) C Outwash 1 Neilton (NeC) A Outwash 1 Newberg (Ng) B Till 3 Nooksack (Nk) C Till 3 Norma (No) 0 Till 3 Orcas (Orl 0 Wetland Oridia (as) 0 Till 3 avail (OvC. avo. OvF) C Till 2 Pilchuck (Pc) C Till 3 Puget (Pu) 0 Till 3 PUY3l Il Ujl_(F'yt B Till 3 Ragnar(RaC. RaO. RaC. RaE) B Outwash 1 Renton (Re) 0 Till 3 Salal (Sa) C Till 3 Sammamish (Sh) 0 Till 3 Seattle J8k) 0 Wetland Shalcar (Sm) 0 Till 3 Si (Sn) C Till 3 Snohomish (So, Sr) 0 Till 3 Sultan (Su) C Till 3 Tukwila (Tu) 0 Till 3 Woodinville (Wo) 0 Till 3 Notes: 1. Where outwash soils are saturated or underlain at shallow depth «5 feet) by glacial till. they should be treated as till soils. 2. These are bedrock soils. but calibration of HSPF by King County DNRP shows bedrock soils to have similar hydrologic response to till soils. 3. These are alluvial soils. some of which are underlain by glacial till or have a seasonally high water table. In the absence of detailed study, these soils should be treated as till soils. 4. Buckley soils are formed on the low-permeability Osceola mudftow. Hydrologic response is ( assumed to be similar to that of till soils. 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 112412005 3-25 .... .... .... ( Shy Creek -Level 1 Downstream Analysis 3 Task 3 & 4 Field Inspection & Drainage System Description and Problem Descriptions The following analysis is based on the August 24, 2005 site visit and related research of available records. Refer to the Upstream Tributary Exhibit located at the end of this section to aid in the following summary of the upstream drainage system. 3.1 Existing Site Conditions Refer to the North and South Onsite Existing Conditions Exhibits located at the end of this section to aid in the following description. Per survey data, the highest onsite elevation is 412 feet in northeast corner. Slopes are generally 1-3% but reach a maximum of 11 % near the west property line in the middle of the site and 15% at the southwest corner of the site. Most of the site is fenced around the outside. There are two asphalt driveways off 144th Avenue SE that lead to existing houses, barns and sheds on the south half of the site. The site contains trees along the exterior edges. The central portion of the site is pastured. Survey data shows some deciduous and evergreen trees clustered along parts of the stream banle Few trees exist on the northern edge of the site. Historical aerial photos (1936) show this site as partially forested. 3.1 Onsite Drainage All onsite drainage flows to the onsite stream and is within one drainage basin for the entire site. Runoff on the north side of the site sheet flows to southeast and into the stream. This flow is visually depicted on the North Onsife Existing Conditions Exhibit. The drainage on the south side of the site sheet flows to the stream as seen on the South Onsite Existing Conditions Exhibit. Southern onsite runoff flows west entering the stream near the downstream end. The ditch along 144 Avenue SE does not collect runoff from this site. The ditch along 142nd collects onsite runoff from Maplewood Creek running through the site. 3.2 Upstream Basin The site receives significant offsite runoff from an approximately 252 acre upstream basin. The upstream basin is to the north and east of the site with runoff entering the site at the east boundary, 144th Avenue SE, where the onsite stream begins. All of 144th Avenue SE December 15, 2005 Job No. 03-185 Page 3-1 Shy Creek -Level 1 Downstream Analysis roadway to the south of the onsite creek bypasses the onsite portion of the stream. The runoff flows to the south and then west along SE I36th Street through ditches and tighline systems. At 142nd Avenue SE, the flow joins Maplewood Creek at the same location as the onsite stream. Roadway drainage north of the creek entrance is assimilated into the onsite stream system. A roadside drainage ditch along 142nd Avenue SE joins the onsite creek. The joined system parallels the road and is released at Maplewood Creek. An Upstream Tributary Map is available at the end of this section. 3.3 Downstream Drainage Description Upstream tightlined flow is joined by a westward-flowing culvert underneath 144'h Avenue SE and continues through the site to the west and then south as an open channel. Onsite flows are incorporated into the stream. The stream enters a 42" culvert which flows to the south and under the intersection of SE 136th Street and 142nd Avenue SE, exiting on the south side of SE 136th Street into Maplewood Creek. Maplewood Creek meanders south and west as shown on the Topozone Topographic Exhibit until reaching the outfall into Cedar River approximately 1.3 miles downstream of the site. At the time of the site visit the Maplewood Creek swale was dry. At the 42-inch culvert the creek is a broad swale (approximately 20 feet wide and ten feet deep). The swale's width and depth increase as it nears the Cedar River. Maplewood Creek is more accurately described as a ravine as the drainage path travels south. 3.4 Downstream Drainage Problems A map and list of drainage complaints registered with King County Water and Land Resources is included at the end of this section. None of the drainage complaints were within I mile downstream of the site. Complaint (1) is regarding increased runoff or flooding at residence(s) from upstream diversion or development. Complaint (2) is regarding a flooded yard and water that is blocked by the road, Jones Place SE that acts as a berm instead of allowing drainage to flow underneath through a culvert. This residence is not downstream of the site. Complaints (3), (4) and (5) are from citizens who were concerned about potential flooding from a future development and changing conditions upstream of their residence. Complaint (6) is from basement flooding at the Cedar River. Complaint (7) is over one mile /" \ away and outside of our analysis limits. Complaint (8) is regarding a damaged culvert December 15, 2005 Job No. 03·185 Page 3·2 Shy Creek -Level 1 Downstream Analysis blocked by debris and the possible future overflow and flooding of a nearby residence. Complaint (10) is regarding basement flooding and is not downstream of the site. Complaint (12) is regarding runoff in a yard created by a sub-standard driveway. It is also not downstream of our site. Complaints (13) and (14) are regarding excessive runoff and flooding believed to begin at the nearby Martin Luther King Church. It is not downstream of the site. Complaint (15) is regarding a pond that was partially blocked and has since been maintained. This pond is indirectly upstream of the site. Complaint (16) is from flooding on 149th Place SE from pond overflow exiting the emergency overflow spillway. This area is also not downstream of our site. After investigation, there are no expected adverse impacts to the areas mentioned in these complaints. The downstream complaints discussed in this section were all located within 1 mile of our site. However, they are not located directly downstream of our site, and are therefore not further aggravated by the proposed development. December 15, 2005 Job No. 03-185 Page 3-3 ~ .;0 g; g: :G- ",,- ~ t' " 0; .2 ~ ~ Cl '" :§ 8 '" ~ 8 ~ '" ~:ii 0'0 ,,~ co", .~ ~ 1i:2: '" '0 ~ COco co~ "'<n '" lOt;; COco ~/. ~'''JI "CO ~ct GQ E:- I " '" WEND 12" ~ Il_ N. END 12" CO+<C ,E_40111 Eo .£NO 11~ . "'1 / /1 1 ) 2-l1l.I. .... ". ~ ... o. .... "'-:" : .. _ -SO.' .. ' W . ::.-A--w ~"-'-.-~ __ .f> ... __ _··-.T- '1mi2-~.( "' , .. (NO 12" ~ £24{)6-5 "E. (t«> 12" Nf' iE_407.0 W. END e" PVC 1f_410.7 E. END /I" PVC 1[_411.2 El'«) 12" C/JNC ~."411 7 L [NO 12" COIIIC 1E_414.9· WEND 12" CONC ~-·-··~o----- ~ .... !,~. ';'""'·15" v "F~ \1. ~ . ~6' """, ~ SIJ .... 5Ni'2b. ... "' . .. :,: ,'" ~~~--~ :. \~~ " ;'~.~",\ ~.~I d·;;..- () P'hC ··os. "}". P 0".. C) ,4i2. W °8 40. QV 8. (j) / .. ,------.. 7.;;> .1 -~ I;" '" .~rV 0, ~" .... ! ,.,Mi· END 12" CONC IE_413.4 11". END 12" cOoIC 1[~4'2 ~ ,-[ / " ! L--1 ..... - Y -;0 410 ! / / l*-l;t' -~i-t'"~;{ ,./ . . ;~'-" ",-;; . . -. ~ '·t~\L.Y~t~,.':.. . .;~.(" ......... :00· .. ·. # ;.~ /-• ~ '" SEE SOUTH ONSITE EXISTING CONDITIONS EXHIBIT 1'1 N. [NO 12" eONe $. (NO 12"COOC 1[_415.J () fNC. Q4'W '1~~' E END 12" C1od' lE_417-5 '8 .... 420'::-x __ ':":"'~"'w---- ( END 12-CIoIP 1E_417.1 0 ! I( 12"CUP N ... 412.92 IE -. • " ~APPROXJI.IATE LOCAnON OF WA TEl< LINE. 8El..1EVEO TO BE ABANOo,-.m """ SEND 12" COi'IC 1(-406 ~ [ WO 24" COtIC IE~"}2 4 N END 12" cpp 1[~4()S 5 '-~ -1211211511_.NE _._-....m ...... , .... 42$..121.3U' ... ..,.,....,.o7SII ... _ -- ~ " ..... ~ ~ ~ SCALE: 1" = 80' 40 80 160 I I ! © 2005 TRIAD ASSOCIATES -!!1 ::z: ~ !@ C i:: -~ ~iii 0i: (!)~ ~:;:; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ."-,. ~II :>. ~~ ~ ~~ ~O c J:).. ~::t: is(/) ° '<-g ~ It ~ ).. ... <:; EI" !!;~ :r.~~ .xA _IIU l'IMCI SIJMY1III _ .... -.:iI"C PiIIitf IiitiKIIII .DnII£F L all: ...... PiiJJ!C'T IA/IVStAI1 dCIUTU"T nRST stlBlGI1'AL NT!: SCAlZ: 10m.: ,'" .. (10' Jm~N/A STAIIP NOT fWD UlIILESS SlCHED AMD DotTED "''' 03-185 11 ~ • e , • L N01fJNIHS'o'M 'N01N31J '/0 A110 )l33lJ:J J.HS J.NtldWOa S3WOH lJ3NNOa 311S H1nos 11SIHX3 SNOl110Noa !:JNI1SIX3 311SNO ~ b CO II = ..... 0 -., W ...J ~ 0 '" en 0 r~ ~- iii) "iJl h .... '· .... O '''''''OJ "~'O V1 w >- "" u o V1 V1 "" a "" ~ >- U1 o o N QI c\ ~ 0" ~ -J"f' "'~ * J.ll"dOCJd " o o ., '* , .... # () ~ ...... . ' .. / (" ,. ,,' " 'LlJnoS '6MP'SUO!J!PUO:) 6u!Js!x] aJ/suo \ SJlq!LlX]\ sa/lj6MO\ C;81i'-._--":)]roCJd\3 wOII:1I -,OOZ 'gO /00 'OJoow(,IJ ® King County ~ ~ .i§iii@il;.hIi,;I441 W1ffi1k31- I _. Coufi l y Bou ndary StrUB I s .. ~ ""!M/f"i ,\,..",;>~ X' t; ;:; Inoo tpor3t'l:l d .~reil Fish ilnd Di1:ctl SAO Si roarn '-'''o<!. j Legend [i lak;:!s and L.l I'Jo P.i·/e ~ f"'/ SItBanlS ~ H)od· ... 'Cly o 100 Ye.a r F~odp13in WLRD Ch~l1nt!1 Mig rul'on HaUlrd Area!'. S A 0 lan ch,·h::J,,-' "-':":. f:,~~ ".cu', '.1 io p '_' C,,'r)1fJ iH S !~ftj In cl uded on <I va rieT y of sources Cl nd IS to change without n o ti ce. makes no representations or warran t ies . expre ss or I . a s 10 <=!ccut<-l c y . completeness. tmlelmess . or r ighls to the use of such King County shall not be li~bl c for <:Iny gen e ral. spe cial, n1d lrcc t , )f1cidell lHI Of consequentia l damages mcludin9. l)ul nol limi ted ID , ,·e "c"uc" o r lo s 1 profi ts I i fro m lI )e use or m isuse of tire informfllion co nl;)l r l(~d on this m.-'lp Any sa le of I his mAp or in fu rmat ion on it I t K in9 II I I GIS I N('ws I S(~"J I "P'S I I Oy vIsi t in g Ihl s an d other Kmq Countr WI~t) pngf!S . you pxorC5sl y DUr ee to b ,> hound l)y tPft115 am ! t:o n ~hl IOl1s of 1I 1(~ site 71l r· deial l ~, KCWLRD Complaint List Rec Complaint PADD No Status Problem Type Rec Date TB PADD PADD 1 SUF PIN NTB 1 2000-0473 11800 14 8TH AVE SE 2 Wed Aug 2 17:00:00 DUVALL AV E 2000-0552 CLOSED DDM C PDT 2000 650 NE APT G714 2323059180 656J4 3 Man Aug 28 17 :00:00 2000-0597 C LOSED DCA C PDT 2000 14100 132ND ST 1523059217 656H2 4 Sun Dec 3 16:00 :00 2000-0731 CLOSED WOD WO E PST 2000 14210 149TH PL SE 1072000430 657A3 5 Sun Oct 29 16 :00 :00 2000-0731 CLOSED MMG FCR PST 2000 14210 149TH PL S E 10720004 30 657A3 6 Sun Mar 1816:00:00 2001-0127 CLOSED ERO R PST 2001 14636 JONES PL 2223059069 656J4 7 5fu'g~~~~ 2001-0333 18100 244 AVE SE 8 Thu Aug 23 17 :00:00 2001-0508 CLOSED DDM C PDT 2001 13803 144TH ST 5 127 000060 656H3 9 Fri Nov 16 16:00:00 2001 -0508 CLOSED DDM R PST 200 1 13803 144TH ST 512 7000060 656H3 10 Sun Dec 23 16 :00 :00 2001 -0805 CLOSED MMF R PST 2001 14005 149TH PL 1072030540 657A3 11 Man Jan 7 16 :00:00 2002-0013 CLOSED DLE C PST 2002 14223 146TH ST 5127000930 656J4 12 Man Jan 14 16 :00:00 2002-0032 CLO SED DTA C PST 2002 13615 156TH AVE SE 1463400047 657A2 13 Tue Feb 4 16:00 :00 2003-0134 CLOSED MNM FCR PST 2003 14005 149TH PL SE 1072030540 657A3 14 2003-0702 13611 SE 121ST ST 15 Man Nov 17 16:00:00 2003-082 1 CLOSED MNM FCR PST 2003 13812 121ST 143765027 o 626H7 16 Tue Nov 1816:00:00 2003-0845 CLOSED MNM FCR PST 2003 1492 o 139TH PL 107203054 o 656J3 Map O utp u t ® King County ~ -=-.. i§#il@W Comments • IIil . -l _. 0 ,# Lege n d 4*'5 Highightad Featura /'" -.... AAJ= A-r-rHI:: $AME Tho BtJffe r /.~/ ""'" L OCATI ON Buffered Selacti:Jn 0 Parcels 6t>Cl ARE Ai -fl-I£ SA.ME County Boundary 0 lakes a nd large Rivers L O C.A-rION Th omas Brothers Map PCige ;'/ Stroams A~E A'l ,It£ SAME: Streets tl og'>~' (a:n; m 'INlRO Drainage Ccl~lairlts 10 $1 3 l,..O(.ATI oN C Incorpofated Ar(!a been by King a variety of sources is subject 10 change without ,e,',e,;enjaHonsor warranties, express or implied , as 10 accuracy , completeness, timeliness . or ri ghts to the use o f such liable for any general, special, indirect. incidental, or consequen tial damages includ ing , but nollimited to , from the use or misuse of the infonnation contained on this map . Any sa le o f this map or information on i I I II By visiting this and other King County web pages . you expressly agree 10 be bound by terms and conditions of the site . The details. Page 1 of i http ://www5.melrokc .gov/serv iet/com.e s ri .csrimap . Esr im ap?Se r viceName =overview&Client V e r ... 10117 /2005 KiNIi CU, WLRU NO, 2261 p, 1 King COlmty Water and Land ResoUrces CWLR) Division 201 S Jackson Sf, Suite 600 Seattle, VV)l 98104-3855 Date: I ' FAX l[ ~ Number of pages including cover sheet: 6!i.- From: Cindy Torkelson WLR Stonnwater Services Section Phone: 206-296-1900 Fax Number: 206-296-0192 IMPORTANT LEVEL 1 ANALYSIS NOTE1,Wedo Dot send copies of certain complaint types that are not relevant such ~BC:W, PI, FIR, FIR and WQA, and we do not send CL and LS types. See key below. Type Sl, 82 and 83 will not be ;:'~~~tJe~ Ml~ The followiDg is a list of complaint types received by the Water and Land Resources StOll11water Services Section. Complaint numbers beginning pr:ior to 1990-XXXX have been archived and are no longer in our possession. They can still be retrieved, if necessary, bufwill take additional time and may not be benencial to your research due to their age, qevelojJment which b.as occurred, etc. If you are interested in reviewing the actual complaints, they' can be pulled (time permitting) for your review. . ,~....... " \ Copies can be obtained for $ .15 per page; and $2,00 per page for plans. ' Keys: " " Typc,GfInTeati~tlOb ,Type of Problem C ActiOJlRequcot DCA ' HCW BusiIJ=' for a..n. Wa1llr DDM CCP R,ospOllSe lo Inqul<y , DES 'CL Claim DLE BH IInfoffiOllcnt onlIald lJIA !lR I!n1broomcnt R,e'Vl<w ' INQ l'CC,FCR,FCB P!lClIily Complolnts MMA. PI SWM Pcc JnquiIy MMl' FIR SWMl'cen..iow ' "MMG l'lH S'IVM 1'00 on !la1d ,MMM "Ill ' Lawsu;t 'MNM 1m FaciliLy Engiuecrlng !tm... ' MNW NDA Neighborl!aod Dtainage A83istance SWF , WQC Warer QUality q,mpWnt WQB WQE Wlitet Quality .IliIfo_t ' , , , wQn WQR W_Quallly&gineeringReviow 'WQ! • WQA Wattr QuBlity Alldit REM WQO WmuQuwLy-O~ SI,S2,SN) Engilleorlng Stndl"" GRT !JeVeIapme:aVCoftSltuollon Il1ainage -Mis()eUaneous Il1ainage -l1ros!onISedimen1lllion Il1ainage -Lo",Widelllllrtl> Mov=ent ~1'ccIwlool~ Diaim1&e -0et1cW lnquhy MainItD"'''' • A.cstheIios Malnttuanoe -Plnodlng Malnl<aalloe-Gonend MaID."" ... ,. -Mowing Ml>JnlroaJlCC-N~s Momteoance M'ain:tenJlnoeo-Noxio", Weeds SWM Poe QUostiOIlB Water QtWiI)'-Best MaQage<l\<Ilt ~ticeo WaterQuaJil)'-Dumplug Water QijaIity -Illicit Co.....uon SWM Pee-RemoasutometIt SWM Feo-Grant SWM P"",Now D!$oount I \' . ~\, , . I, , , R;ei:;~ived th:i1i:l: "",. NAME: ':Y£~d2/l.tili/)' Ao()Rt~S:' // ~a(Y /~<ft:isc:Ztde,{5:E: , ,\ .. -;-' . , .. : l' \ ':' . , " , , \ , : ' .. , I .' ... LotNo; " , / , , " , , ', .. ' , , ',,' I " .. " , ", ) .' ;., "\;' ,.,:, , 'j';.' " . ... '-,~ ': ." ., , ',' \;: ~:\ .. ' I ! '. " , ': " " j'·'··:"T.' , , i ,r " -. " _Mr~, LO, LVV? j: jo~M KINIj 1;1), WLKU NO,2261 ~ 0 KING COUNTY WATER ANn LAND ID:SOtJRCES DMSION ~:1A1 ~ @-~\,.{lO DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REpORT ;.) ;;" o INVESTIGATlON IDlQUEST ')ROBLEM:_-'-'--'......;,..;--c~,----,:--___ _ &lCEIVED BY: Date: P .. \~D rrrfl\j- Type k (Day) (20b) (Eve) (tidS) NAME: -9'tA.--.L~"-'-L _______ ,.. PHONE fabJ -{2[0 d.S'f -Vq; ADDRESS: 6-6i':( ftii/t5n State __ Zip /('Ct55 LOCATION OF PROBLEM, IF DIFFERENT: Access Permission Granted 0 Call First (Would Like To Be Present)~ Plat name: Lot No: Block No: No field investigation required=== 771 Th,Bros: New Basin / {J.. Council District Jd-Charge Noo _______ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified o~ ~/ .. r;;;[eo by: ~ ophon~--le~er __ in person _ j d 0 ~~ -h. !:.f"6~ 4J~ do~ vva+~ Sf;l~ uJl..re~ ~ v-1I~4.:, (Ie. (1..i~·-;'-~ (!~ l~\~ ~ e:.U) t)C6W\t1.t>v' t2-fLDS F ~4-C!rL. DISPOSITION: Turned to on / / by __ OR: No further action recommended because: ~ Lead agency has been notified: 1<1> /ri:! '2 {J1tt,JT""" 7) C T _ Problem has been corrected. __ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: _ Private problem -NDAP wil1 not consjder because: ___ W,ater originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. _--;;o"Locatioll is outside WL~e Area. DATE CLOSED: ~/ It,. / (/0 By: ~ SEE FILE # __ _ _-->Od,er (Specify): Torkelson, Cindy ====,','= =~===" " .. =_ ====.-.=' == .•. ·~c,.,,.= 0: ' _ ... _._~ From: WLR, 011 Sent: Thursday, August 03,20003:30 PM To: GettJe,'Larry; Whiting, Kelly; Torkelson, Cindy Subject: FW: WLR 011 form Submission From: dii.wlr@metrokc.gov[SMTP:OII.WLR@METROKC.GOV] Sent: Thursday, August 03,20004:32;16 PM To: dii.wlr@metroko.goy , Cc: , hate.e<;kstine@metrokc.goY Subject: VVLR 011 form Submission Auto forwarded by a Rule Drainage & uality Pro em Report Name: lee Firth E-mail: Isfirth@gte.net Day Phone: 206-662-1786 EVening Phone: 425-254-9106 Address: 650 Duvall Ave NE Apt G.714 Renton WA 98059 Problem Location:(if different): Jones Place SE, Renton Wa. Unicorporated King County. Problem Type: drainage Reported Problem Description: During Fall, Winter, and Spring, water drains across Jones Place and into the driveway of the residence at 14833 Jones Place SE. This problem appears to be caused by the road "dammIng up" the natural drainage coming from my property (parcel 2323059180). There was apparently no provision for a ditch or culvert which quite obvIously would solve the problem. , hope this issue can be resolved sInce I am in the process of developing this land for my single family residence. The current file number is LOOVA007. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you Lee Firth Anonymous status: Anonyminity is not required for this submission. ================~======~====.~ Notification status: Notify before investigating IL __ 8/3/00 -MrK, 10. IVV? jjb~M K1NGCO,WLRD NO,2261 KING COUNTY WATER ANn LAND RESOURCES DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REpORT ~TIGATIONREQ~ "ROBLHM:_"-,---,-,--,-,-_~~ ___ _ Received from: NAME: MRS. Y MU.J (Day) (tf ~5) PHONE 2 L-b -7, 9 'Sb p, 11 Type-____ , (Eve) ADDRESS: Jl+ I DDS b / '5 L ~ City g;;;..J-<iV'-State. __ Zip _.L.l.~ LoCATION OF PROBLEM, IF DIFFERENT: ~--\ Lot No: Block No: No field investigation requiredDf2..1.b-- A/E ---1.5 --2;2.. JL ' - ' Y4 S T R Parcel No. /!f,23tJ;; f,2 IZ Kroll i/OL: ThBros: New 650 I/J;d 2 • Basin t..C8 . Council District I:J.-Charge No. ____ --__ REsPONSE.-Citizen notified on ~ hi C> ~ , by: ~ phone __ letter __ in person '})<>>-J ,AL-'THA-v$~ ~t' .w] MU, YAHIJ ,;, p)rbv/5 tlr~lM/N2., Q.{P fp.,~ jS'O tNI/. jJi;C6s-Si4~ S~ 1#ri5 S~r/~f"/6C) tJ ,..,.;<; HI $ / 1"~"""-rrJ .,.., , DISPOSITION: Turned to on / / k-Lead agency has been notified:--fi!.:;~/AJ:.:.~c;,~t;;:::.....5~i-'I.2Z~~..LI.~~'JL'!..K~~=== ____ --:-: _ _ ' Problem has been corrected. _ No problem been identified. __ Prior investigation addresseS problem: SEE FILE # __ _ ._ Private problem -NDAP will not com;ider because: ___ W.ater originates onsite andlor on neighboring parcel. __ .... Location is outside WLRD Service Area. _--"Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: ct, I b /0'6 By: l:>f2A4-' R fJ) -rD SvJ€=-ISS ,,/ ~II\. LO. LUU') r)o.r:~G(~~~~~~W~~~'ERANDLANDRESOURCESDMSIC!~: :Ubi P IffrY DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REpORT . • INVESTIGATIONREQUEST Tp:'e ~ PROBLEM: ~rl:fIu:aJ ,/..' ~ 'illCEIVED ay:~ Date: lojqoo OK'd by; FILE No. ex::;J~0761 Received from: .Lh -S- ? 'L v ... ~ ..,'" /J'I ' (Day) (/'~ (Eve) ( ) NAME: /l2mg) rJ()2}'[U:~ . PHONE ,2;).lf -/,;2 9'? ADDRESS: /~/O Ifid J?ilSi3" City Iibi·ii%? State Zip frra)y .' /J10~ 0ge51o or /J'104&9 PIat llaDle: tfAduJ ~ Lot No: Block No: Other agencies involved; No field investigation required== Z3 ~ ".1 T R ParceINo/62J.O'bY$:? Kroll II/IV Th,Bros: New '057173 Basin LGIf Council District--4l.-Charge No. _______ _ REsPONSE; Citizen notified pn __ ~_~_ by: __ phone __ letter _ in person DISPOSITION; Turned totJlfion r(ill! tJO byVoR: No further action recom~ended because: _ Lead agency has been notified: __________ ~ ___________ .,._- _ Problem has been corrected. '_ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: SEE FILE # __ _ _ Private proj>Jem • NPAP will \lot consider because: __ -::Water originates oDsite andlor on neighboring parcet.. . . . Location is outside WLRD Service Area. , Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: I&ZCJ,CiZ __ B~,/·· 1-.. iii r n v, lO~11PY" ~ KiNli CV. WL~U Complaint No. 00-0731 Investigated by: Virgil Pacampara Name: Mike Kovacich Date: November 07, 2000 NO. 2261 P 13 r visited the site on 11/07/00 at 4:00 PM. and went to the residence of Mr. Mike Kovacich to inqu.ire about his compJaint. He was not home at fune of the vi,sit but left a yellow card and proceeded to Briar Hills RID pond (D90669). I notice that some riprap blocked the owall (CS/CB25 to o1l1fall). I did not see the ioundation at the pond but I observed that the water conveying to the 30" CMP outfall (CB24 to outfall) is light brown/mud color and the water is little low. (photo II 1,2). I went back at the site the following day at 1 :00 PM and went to l"vfr. Kovacich residence, sttl1 no body home so I continued my investigation. 1 noticed that the riprap at the southwest comer of the facility seems to be blocking the runoff from his backyard to the stream. Tb.is may have been coutributing to the flooding at the backside residence of l"vfr. Kovacich. I still bave no contact with Mr. Kovacich but I inspected also the two RID ponds in their plat/ vicinity. I also observed that the water flow at the oulfall (CB24 to outfoll) bas significantly iocrease the volume since it rain the last few days and the water is still light brown color. I retraced the source of the wat.,. flow by ope,cing some of the catch basins along the conveyance pipe and checked visually the pipeline where the light brown colored Wl\tl:t came. I noticed that the said water has entered! affected the RID pond of facility D90S1S. The said water (light brown color) hsd came from the pond that the Bumstead Consttuction were exca"V8.tieglcu~. They were pumping out/discharging dirty water with the use of a big SlUIlp pump and a 6" diameter water hose. (see photo #3A, 3B) from 111e pond. They were pumping-out/discharging the water to the King County Parks property (see photo # 4A, 4B~. I also checked the downstream by positioning myself at the edge of the ravine (along roadside ofl54 Place SE. and approximately 030 miles from Lower Cedar River) and looked down to the stream and observed that ilie water was also light brown color. ADdrew McDonald and I went to the site to verily ilie exact location of the construction site on 11109100 at 1:00 PM. The constIUetionlproject site is within the juriBdictionofthe City of Renton, but the Bumstead Contractor is disposing the water to the adjac.ent King County property and this had affected part of the drainage system of the un-incorporated King CoWlty. We walked along the trail of King County Park and the sjJt show sign of sheet/channel flows in some area and it ended/entered into 24" inlet pipe conveyance at the end road of 148 PL. SE. Silt was found on that site_ The City of Renton inspector fo, the said constIUction is Mr. Steve Pinkhum, He was not available at that time and we left a message with regards to the complaiot. We called SUe Clarke tbtough Brian Sleight. And at that Ibn. Andrew McDonald left the site for his other inspection woIk. Eric of Bumstead Coostruction came over at the corner of 144"' Ave. SR. and SE 136"' ST. (few blocks away from the construction site) and spolce to him about dirty water being discharged io KC Park property. H~ ionnediately talked to his woIker to stop the pumping/discharging of the water. Sue Clarke anived.at the site and spoke with Eric Bumstead Construotion, and the three of US drove to the site and walked to tho trail going ioto the down s1reaJD direction. I showed to them how far the water had travel tbtough the conveyance pipeline, catch basins and the RID ponds (D90515 & D90669) inclnding the outfallio Facility (D90669) leading to the stream! ravine. The agreement between S"" Clarke and the Bumstead contractor is that "they will clean the affected area. of the pond (D90515) and the conveyance pipe iInmOOiately the following day. That Sne Clarke, Eric (Bumstead) and l"vfr. Stove Pinkhwn (City of Renton inspector of the project) will weet Bomelbne on Monday (11/13/00). (SEE ATTACHED FACllJTY SKETCH OF D90S15 andD90(69) / MK. LO. LVV~ j:ji~M ,h'KlNU CU. WLRO, ""D' ;o:.4t<1IDRESOURCESDIVISIO NO . 2261 '7 ' . n..nIfG \...1.1 ... 1' 1. n Ju,r,R.ttJ." Lit\..!.' l~ P. 19 - ___ "' DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REpORT INVESnGATION REQUEST Type 0.=... __ ., ECElVBDBY: Received from: NAME: .J/l'c./c. O/T;(/c../C ADDRESS: Nt U s;e Jo"t/cS" LOCATION OF PROBLEM, IF DIFFERENT: FILE o. 2001 ~ (5/ (Day) (<fU'J. PHONE ZLr-ZGf2..- State LvA' Zip '7o°,J'J'" Access Permission Granted 0 Call First (Would Lik~ To Be Present) 0 L-;t/1lPSc..(~€ PUSH;!:#' .-#,¢'T.iiA.("ft.... //t/7"C' f7'rJ ~J~ rr 6..#1'6c, Plat name: W/frc/l TII.4'r r)JWI 'TO rU>oV l.-v' C!.~A'4/""'~';'S #4'.F 4€c:-v PIS(lC4('G?4 ,4...vtJ ,A4'.,.v (J ,ct:.OU/(,rl/G ~¥"et:)VGN Havre;, 'fYVt. r~ er;.teu'v ~ A0 ~ ~~ Lot No: Block No: No field inv;;stigation required ~ S T R Parcel No . .JJJ.-30 57® Kroll V5 Th,Bros: New GS(pJt/ RESPONSE: DISPOSITION: Basin f.L;fl.-Council District R Charge No .. ____ ~ __ _ Citizen notified on _______ by: __ phone __ Jetter __ in person Tumed to .vot-~ If) 31 O( / e>r e~4;t'6e: #" SI<17N by ztJ> OR: No further ;rotion recommended because: __ Lead agency has been notified: ________ -,--_______________ ,--_ __ Problem has been corrected. __ No problem hilS been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: SEE FILE # __ _ _ Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: _-......_W,ater originates onsire andlor on neighboring parcel. DATECLOSl:D: 03/{3 lor By: ??:f _~Other (SpecifY): j?,zt:vCC.r (X?-H/t...&'r&Zl ¢>3/~/c;J( I NG CO. Basin? Yes· 0 No 0 ** .****************************'* Th1P ACT CRITERIA ***~***!f:Il'*'.****.*************** POINTS -ADD 0, 2, # PROPERTIES PUT. RISK IMPACT OR 4 FOR SEYERITY IMPActED (+Q, 2. OR 4) TOTALS Living structure, 0 I 2:0* fmished floor (20 + ) x + - Access (4 + ~ X 2-L!a .. + - Septic/Well (8 + ) X + - Other structure or \ ~ crawlspace (4 . + 0 ) x .;-- Landscaping/yard/ '2---) ..l q parking (1 .. X - Other propenyl drainage system (0.5 . ) x -.. Narural resources 3 + ~ , -.{ -r SUBTOTAL -(p(p . 1""lIC~,KK .. ;ac""'.~:.IIi:",""",;.:-=.wlK~;XIE"~~'K;jIOI;.~¥ E\~-r FREQI.!"'"L"'{Cx" F.';'CTOR )c""'~1IC~;!!\"~~J<~"';I!C.!o'eX*"'~IICl1c;;; •• ~XX Chronic (1 + times/year) .. , .. , , . , , , 20 2-5 years; indefInite but often; channel erosion '"..",", 1 0 5-10 years ' " . . .'. .' " . .. . ,', . . , ,', •.• ,.5 . 10-25 years .... ' ... , , , •. , .•. , , , . 2 > 25 years, ' . :.' , . . . • , , . . . , . .'. . CD Date: Rated by __ _ x E,F,F. TOTAL IMPACT SCORE = G:. 0 **~**"*"****"'****"**",. .... ****** COST-BENEFTI' RATIO .. ,.* .. ** .. ** .. ****"' .... * .. "''''******>i< .. " COST OF SOLUTION S U.S) OUO 'TOTAL IMPACT SCORE x 100 I COST = !\'DAP PRIORITY SCORE = Date: 3-5 -b I Rated by S,C. *.Note: Flooding of liviilg ipacc from storms < 10 year. rece!ve.s top priority, y/l9/95 ~---r-' -.-,'.~ ~-. ,...,. . i.itIlM>\fZ ~,"7~:.~. NO. 2261 P. 21 ,> "'~: .:: Cil' INIi cu. WLKut-.I1,,, Llu, .. ~r ~ ..,u..w\ f UA,) ..J Three optioru; 1) Our (WLRD )basic involvement under the NDA program could include: • providing technical assistance in applying Ie FEMA for recovery assiStance • a$S~ with permit applications noeded to clear the slide from the property • provide technical assi.stano~ regarding drainage issues The property owners would be responsible Ie hire on engineer and contractor to develop 0 cleanup and restoration plan and secure the necessary pemrits. 2) A higher level of involvement under 'the NDA program could inlcude: • WLRD would aot as Engineering and design consultants and secnre permits for homeowners • Home owners would hire a contracler to ao the project, as designed by WLRD 3) A MmpJete project would include: • Design/engineering of debris removal and drainage repairs and improvement • Secure perm;ts for projeot • RemOVal of mud and debris • Recorutruct private roadway an<t'Complete drainage <"Pair. )-.J\)A dc."t-S M-t a.cJ4.ress ~vrt~ ~~~~b~ ~'1)A4C\P ~ ~ be. ~p~ ~ Y'~-r U~ ~t-+ltp cia.. 1:> N t ~~ tH 1\. LO. LVIJ') ~IIHl lV, WLKU NO, 2261 p, 22 Arima, Debbie Friday, March 09, 2001 1 :11 PM Hansen, Nancy; Bikle, Anne; Clarke, Sue FW: Next Steps on Cedar River Slide and River Conveyance -FOR TOMORROW Importance: -High lutes!" on the Cedar River Slide -----Originol Mes~ge--- From: Clark, Dave Sent: Friday, Murch 09,200111:47 AM To: Honsen, Nancy; Arima, Debbie Cc: l.evesque, Andy: lucchetti, Gino; Butler, Terry Subject: FW: Next Steps an Cedor River Slide and River Conveyance Import""ce: High Meeting with Corps and Renton Please see the message below concerning the next steps planned to deol with the Cedar River Slide, We "re meeting with Renton and the Corps next Wednesday efternoon(March 14)to scope out some options concerning whet might be done to improve chonnel conveyance for the Cedar River in its new loeotion. I emphasize Inight, as there is not yet any clear rationale for taking ony emergency action, given that there is no clear public health and safety problem with the river in its new location. No public or private improvements are currently in any risk situation. Whether there is a flooding, risk thiS coming winter, will be a topic of our discussion with the Corps and Renton and that diSCUSSion will shape what we layout as options, Meeting with Resource Agencies Secondly, we intend to meet with the resource agencies(NMFS, USFWl.S, Stote Fisheries, Muckleshoot Tribe, and Stote DOE) fallowing the meeting next week with the COf'pS and Renton. At that meeting, which is not yet Scheduled, we will walk through whatever plan of action we might propose to see if the agencies agree or not. In effect. we will be doing consultation with them. I don't want to speculate on what their reaction might be or whether We will be likely to achieve consensus on any given project action, It moy be thot we do nothing now and get ready to do a flood fight next Winter. if that is necessary, Preliminary Domage ASSessment Lastly. we have submitted a preliminary domage assessment worksheet to FEMA and the State for the Cedar River Landslide, The damage assessment includes the removal of the landSlide, slope stabilization, channel restoration and repair to the County's Punnet/Briggs revetment. This is essentially a cost estimate to put things(inc/uding the river) bock to the pre-slide condition. We are not recommending that we undertake to 1 .. - ArK. l~.lUU'J j:3~PM . KING CO. WLRD "",.."... .... ' .. , We are simply followin9 the federal disaster procedures required in documenting damages and costs of repairs. We will ve some internal discussions about this potential work and no doubt be continuing to document information about the damage estimate with fEMA as we move from prefiminary assessments to Damage Survey Reports(DSRs). Potential Alternate Project Our general thinking is to consider propOSing an alternote project at this site(i.e., not doing the slide and river repair). My understanding is that if FEMA and the State approve the alternate project, they then can authorize 75% of the DSR costs for the alternate project. The alternate project could include essentially anything, provided that it is conSistent with the federal rules for alternates. This might involve purchasing the slide damaged homes, purchasing the flood damaged homes, constructing fish enhancement projects, improving channel conveyonce and a myriad of·other things. We will need to work carefully with FEMA and thEi State to come up with on alternate that makes sense and is something they can support. The alternate project would not likely be implemented until 2002, given the time it usually takes to move through the federal process. Let me know if you would like any further details or information. DC -----Original Message----- From: Ronald Straka [mailto:Rstraka@ci.renton.wa.us] Sent: Friday, March 09, 200110:59 AM To: Dave.Clark@METROKC.GOY; monte.e.kaiser@NWS02.usace.army.mil; Noel.LGilbrough@NWS02.usace.a rmy.mil Cc: Gregg Zimmerman; Lys Hornsby; Andy.Levesque@MEI1WKC.GOV: /7ino.Lucchetti@METROKC,GOV; Nancy.Faegenburg@METROKC.GOY; Terry.Butler@MI;TROKC,GOY Subject: Re: Next Steps on Cedar River Slide and River Conveyance 111e afternoon of 3/14/01 works for us at Renton for the meeting that you are requesting, The meeting will be held in Room 511 at Renton City Hall on the 5th floor. Please let me know the exact starting end time of the meeting, but for now I have reserved Room 511 from 1:00 PM to 5:00 PM. If the date of the meeting or time changes, let me know ASAP. 111anks Ronald J. Straka, P.E. City of Renton Surface Water Utility Engineering Supervisor 1055 S. Grady Way· 5th Floor Renton WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7248 Fax: 425-430-7241 z NO. 2261 P 23 £m; sent; To: ~IN~ CU. WLkU Rochelle, Joe Friday, March 09, 2001 9:25 AM Clarke, Sue NO. 2261 P. 24 Subject: RE: Cedar River Slide Sue, I left a voice message for you. Since we may havs trouble connecting, here's my quick thoughts. AVOid making any cornmnment on the NDA that would exceed the cap. If they ask if the county has funds available, I would mention the NDA, but immediately explain that there is a prioritization process and a cap and that these funds may not be adequate to address the consequences of the slide. On the issue of taking money from citizens to apply towards a lix, I think we Should avoid that as you righHy point out that we then become a contractor and get all the headaches that come with that. If FEMA gave the county direct doHan, to do repairs of the county's own facilities, I have less of a problem. When I was asked to reView the document of agreement to raise structures In the flood plain wnh FEMA $$ for River Protection Section, I worked very hard to make it clear that the County was not a "contractor" but a conduit for funds frorn FEMAto the homeownt'jr. The County enjoys statutory immunity from Suit for what it does/does not do in the area ofllood prolectlon actiVities. As I read the statute, the county woUld lose that immunity !fit becomes a contractor with the homeowners. The immunity does not attach to contractual arrangements. Of course we could try to build in some kind of waiver in the contract, but I would wager that however strongly We worded the waiver from suit, the County would still get sued if the repair wolk were 10 fail sometime in the future. If FEMA wants to give us money to do repair of our own facilities thaI's great. If FEMA wants to give mOrley to citizens to do repairs on their own property, !hafs great. aut I don't think we should become a contractor for the citizens and take their FEMA money and do the work for them. From: Clarke, Sue Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 6:16 PM To: ROchelle, Joe Subject: Cedar River Slide I mpOrtance: High Joe, I have been asked to ottend a public meeting that R9n Simms is hosting on Saturday morl1ing as a WLRD repre!lentative. In attendance will be the citizens thot were affected by the slide on the Cedar River. I have been asked to be there to address NDA questions and if there is CU'lything the NDA prosram con do to assist these people. r think we may be sticking our necks aut a bit, and this may not really fall under the definition or intent of the NDA program as r'm sure it will go over the $50,006 spending cap on NDA projects, Do you have any comments or input? Also, the question of usil19 FEMA money hIlS come up,ond whether or nat the County could accept money froln citizens if the citizens could get $$frotn FEMA to make repairs. We (the county) would became a contractor for the citizens. Any Legal comments? or Code problems you see with thIs. r'II be iPl the office pretty much 011 day Friday. Thanks for Clny help on this, SlleC/arke Engineer Drainage Services Section King COllnty Water and Land ResolJrces 206-296-8311 1 .. ' 'SX1el\t of Slide -~'''''''''' "-\ \ \ '. \. .... \ \, \ "" :r.. '\ \ .f \ Pattick ! ~~.. ..~---------.. --' O"".gt \ i ' ~ \ I j i TwO Uistone sue"'" palM i \ J i f \ D1,,<;Ited Sn-el)1'!l floW Aftet sand\;>ag!;il\l\· MK, LD, LVV? j:j~PM KiNG CO, WLRD NO,2261 p, 31 KING COUNTY WATER AND LAND REsOURCES DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTlGATION REpORT c PROBLEM: !'{£calVED BY: ~ J4 ~, I 2 OK'd by: FlLENo. 2001 -033.3 Received from: NAME: wehf<J L ~S ~"'III (Day) (' , )-(Eve) ~>-_---,J PHONE ______ _ ADDRESS: Igloo al/t/ k<-se City State WA Zip __ _ LocATION OF PROBLEM, IF DIFFERENT: Access Permission Granted 0 can First (Would L!k~To Be Present) 0 D 1';). '331 Plat name: JP..t/r.J/4 L ~~ Lot No: Block No: investigation required,== fhBros: New h3'8"CI Council Distric No " _______ _ REsPONSE: Citizen notified on ______ by: __ phone _'_letter __ in person DrsPOSlTION: Turned to on __ f<---LI _ by __ OR: No further action recommended beClllJse: __ Lead agency has been notifled:,_--,-,,--_-,---__________________ -,---_ _ Problem has been cOrrected, _ No problem has been Identified, _ Prior investigation addresses problem: _ Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: SEE FILE # __ _ WIIter originates onsit~ ,~ighbOring parcel. _~Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: 71b 10 / By: Se-?7o/-CJZ7/ ArK. L~. LUU~ J:JY~M K1NG CO. WLRO _ NO.2261 lUNG CUUNTY WATER .R£sOURCES DIVISIG" / ~ DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REpORT p 32r ~ I lNVESnOA nON REQUEST Type _""C,,-- 'PROBLEM: Dl24ltJA6r,;: .. £CEIVEDBY: L., GtFTT~ Date: <:;:/2..4-10/ OK'd by: ~F[LENO. 2001 -OSCf6 j i Received from: NAME: Et....(t/MC7l-/ 41c-N~~L (Day) (12-5) (Eve) 1....(_-1 PHONE z..z.t, -.s:::t?O :·AnDRESS: 13J'(J '3 5~ 1£ 4,r# ..>r City £~tV State/{/,1 Zip j?,f'OSj' LOCATION OF PROBLEM, lFDIFFElUlNT: Access Permission Granted 0 '1>uf 1b4l (\ I Call First (Would Like To Be Present) Qg ..sw",J~ ..>fr'lrr U/e;~k~ I"t.~"" Ctu... -'fn-e-7>2. /a ;00 A rcJ .5cr vP..#PT. Pl'hl'AffT (~ .syS-r~ {IV n"'N"T C~ ~ IE:' I"Llj '.:; ~ . () (f ~'I,\ \f't-c vJ u.l ILL. 1370S" JE 14' ./'71-/ ('..0/-.JJ....-s. To ( YWJ..-H '7 Ie 0 (J !S""""A.\"y' PclCE7 A.J=-tL c/,J ''"''f''''f~",.r/~, sf, "A d '-'4 ;i1!1. 0;,4 . Plat name: ~~ ~ Other involved: . Lot No: No field inv,estil~ati(Jn re,quiJ:ed __ Block No: s T R Parcel No.51)..7rx:x::rJ{jJ KrollW ThBros: New &"icari3 RDP £ Basin t..£fL Council District / J.-Charge No. _________ _ REsPONSE: Citizen notified on id'" ,*{41 by: ~ phone __ letter __ in person -~ "to ~ ..,... ~ 1 d~~ ~ 1l'\A"r f14~ 2.~ jty, ~o IV lUlU-~ jV~'" ~ ~ ~VlevJ ~D "PU-iJ ""'~ <.Vjl./.... Be. ~~ 1"P'eO '{;O ~ ~tees:. ~ ~ ~,....,.~~. DISPOSITION: Turned to g on /II 17/ 01 b~: No further action recommended because: _ Lead agency has beeo notified:. __ · _____________________ -:-:--_ _ . Problem has been corrected. _ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: SEE FILE # __ _ . _ Private problem. NDAP will not consider because: j--- ___ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. ~\ i;)' DATE CLOSED: 6 I It /o'l.... By: -?!f _~Other (Specify): mplaint No. 2001-050S Investigated by: Virgil Pacampara , DETAlLS OF INVESTIGATION .Name: Elizabeth Menzel Date: 9-05-01 NO. 2261 P. 33 I went to the site on 9/05/01 at 9:45AM to investigate the complaint of Mrs. Menzel. Her complaint were the following: 1) She said that drainage system in front 0[#13705 SE 1441H continues to get plugged. Overflow will impact property. (Site-A) 2) That she wants to know if the drain pipe between 1,ot-2 and Lot-3 (#13821 SE 144TH) were design to collect water from the intersection of SE 144th 81. and 139th PI. SE. (Site-B) 3) She said that the east side ditch at the SE comer of intersection 144'h Ave. SE and SE 142ND ST. was left unattended leaving the ditch with full of dirt The eroded dirt will impact the positive water flow during the rain. (Site-C) Site-A is located at the intersection of SE 141 St. and SE 144 TIl S1. The ditch is located at the SW comer. SE 144'l'H ST slopes north westerly and SE 141" slopes north easterly. The two cross culvert (12"- concrete pipe) along SE 141 sr were completely clogged. A 12" concrete drainpipe located at the drainage easement between 1ot-30 and 1,ot-31 (# 13702) were clogged. This pipe was design to collect surface water from the two cross culvert and conveys/outlets to the ravine. Overgrown vegetation were blocking the inlet pipe. A shed (10' by 16/) was built along the drainage easement. The drainage system in the site is not functioning. Mr. Bill Helin has told me that he remembered that there was a pipe end at the ravine. The pipe end could not be located due to heavy vegetation and steep terrain Site-B is located at the-intersection ofSE 144m S1. and 139TI1 PI. SE. The area is flat and SE 144TH St. start to slopes approximateJy 300 feet from the intersection· on a south easterly directions. The culvert crossings along the intersection were not clogged. The existing plans and road profiles shows that the drain pipe between Lot-2 and Lot-3 (#13821 SE 144TI1) were design to collect surface Water from the culvert and roadside ditch. I could not locate the pipe end, must have been buried or pave over due to heavy vegetation and steep slope of the ravine. Sit~C is the subdivision sign/landmark, located at the SE corner of the intersection of SE 144m Ave. SE and SE 142ND St. The roadside ditch is at the west side of the landmark. Mrs. Menzel has informed. me that that some time last year the Pugat Sound Enetgy construction personnel has an installations/repair project at the site. After they completed the work, she said that PSE personnel forget to remove the eroded dirt at the roadside ditch that was impacted by the construction. The impacted portion of the roadside ditch is approximately 50 feet long by'S feet wide byI6lnches deep. The continued erosion may eventually bury/covered the inlet pipe. SEE SKETCH AT NEXT PAGE KINu co. WLKU NO. 220 1 P 34 -~-....... ~~-" ...... .-age:2C~~~~uation of sketch 2001-0508 Menzel) Water supply easement as claimed by Mr. Helin Edge of cliff easement HOllSe LOT-30 Outthll Plant/orchard ----.::;.(1 Clogged culvert (12" cone. pipe) Water ponding during rainy days as claimed by Mrs. Menzel t:J RAVINE (iO'x16!) r::I ~ Clogged (12" -conc. SE 141 ST. SITE-A Clogged culvert (12" conc. pipe) 139TH pLSE ~ .-----.-.--.-----.-.-.-~ HOUSE Lot-I 4 NTS SITE:B ditch _~. ~;:::=~ ----------~----- ditch ~---------~ Culvert-12" cone. pipe ~-...,....<-3>I SE I44TH ST. k-® --.-~1~-.;:€~~~~~~~t1~~~~~3=~ .... ~+--1=--=.~-.+ i 12" cone. drain pipe (buried) Pamaniemi /I 13821 I ~U:' I i ! ,i r , ! -.-.L.-.-.-----.-.-.-.-.---.-.. J...8.<H+.'-----.-.-.-.-----.-. ___ . .1 __ ._._ Edge of cliff Outfsll RAVINE See next page for continuation of sketch: 2001-0508 MenzeL ~.---.~ Page-3 (continuation of sketch 2001-0508 Menzel) Eroded side t 1 I i i i NO. '2161 P. 35 ~ NTS SITE· C ~-:::.:.::.::::,,~~~SE 142"" sr. Subilivision sign and ~ Roadsi<le ditch (5' wide by 18" Wide) DATE: <H-2002 RE: ENGlNEERmG EVALUATION FOR COMPLAINT NO. 01 -050S MENZEL All three sites are within the Plat of Maple Heights Addition that was developed in the late 60's: Site A: Ditch, culvert & roadway flooding at the intersection ofSE 141" St and SE 144ih St Site B; Ditch & culvert flooding south of the intersection ofSE 144'" ST and 139'" PL SE Site C: Roadside ditch & culvert have been partially filled by a contractor SE of intersection of SE 141" and 144'" Ave SE. COMPLAINT CHRONOLOGY; ORIGINAL; 8-24-2001 FffiLD!NY: 9-5-2001 VIRGIL PACAMP ARA FffiLD EV AL: 3-6-2002 ALAN MEYERS OLD FILES: 1992-0053 at 13901 SE 144" St (file not found in the research room files) lJACKGROUND; Please read the attached complaint investigation report written by Virgil Pacarupara. In a memo dated 11-17-2001 to Ada Packard at Roads, Larry Gettle indicated these drainage concerns are related to the condition and :function of the road drainage system in Ms. Menzel's neighborhood. He requested );oads have the right-of-way system checked. In about January, 2002, Lori at Roads Division 4 vactored and flushed the road draiO.age systems at sites A and B and detennined that the road's drainage culverts at these sites do not extend from the road ROW northwest and south to the top of the respective bluffs. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION: Site A: The impacts at this site include water ponding with ice on the paved road surface, roadside ditch flooding and private yard flooding on parcels # 30 and #31 both located north of the intersection. Tract A (see attached parcel map) is dimensioned as a 10 foot wide by 176+1-foot 10I;lg drainage/walkway easement (5 feet on the edge of each parcel). Other than a short piece of concrete culvert located near the road right of way' line, no other culvert could be seen witlrin this drainage easement. Mr. Helin, the owner oflot 31, said he installed the existing IOx16 foot shed in 1987 across Tract A about 70 feet north of the property line. There is nothing on the face of the plat documents to restrict use oftbis area. The shed is located about 15 feet from the top ofa bluff above a long steep slope towards the northwest. According to Lori at Roads Division 4, the two south to north 12-inch concrete road culverts lUlder SE 141" Street intersection were cleaned out in about January 2002. . 1 .,-KING CO. Site B: The Roads maintenance crew determined that the 12-inch concrete culvert draining southwest between the homes at 13821 and 13901 SE 144'" Street (owners Parharriemi and Bartel) deadends about 12 feet south of the south ditch line opposite the 139~ Place SE cuI de sac. Based on telephone conversations with long term property' owners Mr. Parhaniemi and Mrs. Bartel, the south side of the street drainage system floods following heavy rains but there has not been any damage or impacts to their properties. Mrs. Bartel said she occasionally cleans some silt and leaves from the roadside ditch along the north side of her property. SiteC: . At tills site, according to Ms. Menzel, PSE personnel forgot to remove dirt and gravel in the roadside ditch last summer following construction of improvements to the Maple Heights Community entrance ~gn area. This area relies on infiltration into the local Everett gravelly sandy loam soils to deal with stonnwater. During long heavy storms someponding occurs in yards and roadside ditches. It is not recommended to drain stormwater off high bluffs in the area due to the steep erosive slopes below. The recent cleaning ofroad culverts at Site A has already improved drainage in the area. PROPOSED SOLUTION: r recommend this file be closed to a referral to King County Roads Maintenance Division 4 as follows: . Site A: Residents complain of ponding water on the pavement surface in the intersection. Site B: No problem identified. SiteC This complaint has been previously referred to Roads Division 4. Sent: To: Cc: Subject: ~JNIi lU. WLKU sie.iilt.t. Brian Tuesday. June 11,2002 1 :07 PM Packard, Ada Meyers, Alan ditch cleaning hello ada, this issue has already been back and forth between us but hopefully this is the last time. in november of last year, gettle referred aome problema to you. Lori cronin went out and vectored several pipes which seems to have improved the problems but the president of the hoa still has a Couple .concerns: 1) the southwest COl::ner of the· intersection of se 141st st and se 144th st. over time, debris has accumUlated in the ditch. the area relies on infiltration to deal with surface runo!!. water ponda in the ditch until it infiltrates. appal::ently water gets up onto the edge of the road because the ditch is full of debris. 2) similar to item 1 except it is at the southeast corner of 144th ave ae and Se 141st Bt and that the material iII the ditch may have been left by pse crews after doing some work and water does not get On the roadway. neither problem appears to be causing a health or safety concern. we looked at the other issues here after lori did her work. a couple of drainage easements don't have conveyance systems in them. since infiltration in the area is WOl::king and not creating a hazard, we thought it best to not put conveyance in these easements because they would outlet on steep, erodible slopes and likely cause mOre problems than they solve. if dot has a ditferent opinion of the problems related to infiltration in this area, let me know. Ollr file is closed. arian sleight, P.E. BSL6 206.2~6.6a2S 1 m. LO LUU? j: ~U ~~G c.~~ .. C..u:.. ~~;<.UfER ANn LAND REsOURCES l>IVISl~rp61 DRAINAGE INvESTIGATION REpORT P. 39 Type EcfL- RECBlVED BY: Date: FI ENo. 2001 - V (Day) (l/J-~ (Eve) l-( ----,) NAME:.!Ylitll {tf~~ PHONE &.3S~-tJ367 ADDRESS; ft-(qd.O 86 L'69'f.4-t. Pi.-City ~~i-J State LtJ,A Zip __ LOCATlON OF PROBLEM, lFDlFFEltliNJ: It/60s /tj~ PL- AccessPermissiolt Granted D CallFi~St (Would Like To Be Present) 0 ~(o~~ Plat name: P'765lS-Lot No: Block No: Other agencies involved: ~,~ No field in' vestligati,oD ~~~=== , ;:s; R ParcelNo.lD7a.030516 Kro1l11/1eJ Th.Bros: New (di7/}3 RDP__ Basin UJl-.-Council District I;;'" Charge No. _________ _ REsPONSE: Citizen notified on !:1d~ i 0 1 by; L phone . __ letter __ in person -1'f1ir ~ ~~tJ\ WM ;t~ ~ ~/EW.4J.D vJI\..L ~t:E. 1'2..\.J..)I=e·~~ DISPOSITION: Turned to.£ on j?!Z4to/ bY~R:. No further action recommended because: ~ Lead agency has been notified:_-:-__ ,--~--_,___;c--_---:c-_:__-___,~_:_:__--:__:_ __ Problem has been corrected. _ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: SEE FILE (I __ _ _ Priva.te problem -NDAP will not consider because: ___ W,ater Originates onsite andlor on neighboring parcel. DATE CLOSED: to / 2.1-/0?,.... By:-7i:f _---'Other (Specify): /~t:e:M <!::6U...(8'C--r72! K1N(j CO. WLRD NO. 226r-p. 40---ArK. La. LUU~ j:4UYM -------~~,-,~----~--------.-,----------- CO'4PLAINTNO.2oo1-o805 InVMigated By: Vugil Pacampara DETAlLS OF INVESTIGATION Namo: Kenneth Taylor Daw. 12J13/(Jl '-'-'-~ I responded to II flooding during II storm event on 12113/01 at 4:30 PM. The intc;tsection of 149TII PL. SE andSE n9m PL, was flooded. The water l~eI at the Wity 090515 (BrlarIDIIs #4) was very high but not overflowing to rbo spillway. The &crutywas a by-pas8 pond. The poIld was 1i.mctioning well, the watet was flowing through the contml structure and nnto tM ocinoo. The three ~ basins at 'the inters.:ction oftbe road were overfiowlng lIlJd sudiu;e water was tlowiug oato the road cd by ~ the pond. It seems thatei.iw;cit is clQgged or too much water coming from 149 TH PL. SHand Sll.139'l1tpL. The watet level was 8ppIlm. ~ inchcs. It seems tItat~ were too much water going 10 CB4. I ob$erve the great mnount of~ coming out:from the 3 catch basinll despite the pOnd WlII< worldng.l spob with~. Brian Slates with regards 10 'the condition of the flooding. The surf'ace waWr has not RIiIdIed the houses around the area. It just stayed 'Iri1hin tht) edgt) of the lawn and Bide walks. I aIro notice tbat1hetwo catch basins lidlcoverwas fIlJIlQVed from the frame. ~ KC Roads ~ arrives at aroUIld 7:00 PM and iJIstalled the sign ("Water on the roadway") at the upstream and downstream of tile 149m PL. SB. I teU1m 10 the ~ to cbook the condition oftbe f100<Ung 81ld the water baO receded. I spoke with Mr, Thylor with regards to "the water at their basement. He infonned mC! that the water has reached. their beater. I went to the Ctawi space and netice tbat the water was gone The heater was ~ It seems tll8t the warer that impacted tht) crawlspace and the heater did not come from the surfuce water but iiom the ground water seeping unto tbe crawlsp:we. The clearance from tho crawl surliu::e and the base of the heater wu appI'O)t. 2"-4ft. I walked and drove to tho upstream and found that theJ:e was a largo drainage tiIcility that was disc;barging Wl\ter do9\'!lStrealn. The drainage facility was part of the new large development that was being cons1:1uctOO at SB 123m ST.lt seems 1hat the water from !his fucillty was diBcbalging much amount IIfwater that may have Wt1lribu1ed to rise of the watIlr level of tho pond (l;)9OS IS). The IIJD.()UIIt ofwater disohatge from the new development bas to be address In tho future that may impa.:t'the fiu:iIity D90515. The 13ciIity is located within the Renton jurisdiction. I teported the clogged eatch basin. at the intcrsedionof 1491ll PL. sa and SB 139m PL. KC Roads drailIage hot line. SEEFACILlTY SKETOI ArK. LU. LUU~ j:4urM KlNG CO. WLRD '. Fm: Len Juhnke 1m: Engineering Review for complaint #2001...()805 Complainant; Kenneth Taylor 14920 SE 139'" Place Renton, WA 98102 Background Called compainant who said problem had already been corrected. Findings NO.2261 P. 41 Checked with Drainage Investigator, Virgil Pacampara, with regards to complaint. Found out the problem was corrected on 4129/02 by removing debris from the conlrol structure and removing the trash rack at the outlet from CB2 to the pond of facility D90515. NDA Impact Score = N/A Options and Discussion Propo~ed Solution File should be closed as problem corrected. NDA Priority Score = NI A j:4VrlVI ~llv\J I,V, IVLKU KING COUNTY 'WATm AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISION NU, TI61 p, 42 tH 1\. LO. LVV') -- ~''\ DRAlNAGEINVESTIGATION REpORT i n , _ A ;,..v: tJ. lNYBSUGATIONREQUEsr ) PROBLEM: ~...I RECEIVED BY: c')f,,&#pr? Date: t IVOd-. OK'd by: } -"1 ' Received from: \ (Day) (~) (Eve) >--! _--.l) NAME: y!1M. /lJaRJ11k \, , PHONE Nh -aa.S'd. __ --:;;-::;-- ADDRESS:/t..f,}-J.-3 sr;'\. 1(j~M, S1City fl..p;;jjj-n State_ ZiP9%@ _ LO(:ATIONOFPROBLEM, lFDlFFERENT: ~ Type ~ , - FILENo. 2002 ~(()13 A~c~ Permissihn GJ'tmtea 0 , ' Plat name: Lot No: , Block No: DISPOSITION: Turned to _ on _~!_-,-/ _ by __ OR: No further action recommended because; _ Lead agency has been notified:,_~. __ :--__ ----: ______________ _ _ Problem has been corrected, _ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: V ' SEEFlLE # --_ -A-l'rivate prObl%-NDAl' will not consider because: ' i, • " Water originates onsite an~~~ jighbOring parcel. DATECLOSEl): It {II 02-By: _---~ /P _ _ -_f1;fl~ / KING COUNTY DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT FIELD INVESTIGATION NAME: MRS KAESER ADDRESS: 14223 SE 146m ST, RENTON, WA. 98059 PHONE: (425) 226-0252 DATE OF INVESTIGATION: 01..{)8-2002 INVESTIGATED BY: VP I went to the residooce ofMJ:. and MIs. Ka£ser on 1I08!o.z at 2:00PM to investigare a llmd slide oolllpJaint. Mls. Kaeser bas oonooru that the cliff overlooking the Cemir River bas slid Jiom bee backyaId. The properties of Mrs. Kaeser-are two cotnbined lots (Lot-IO mill) bollllded by1he fullowing: to tl!Q nOIth by SE 146'" ST., to the west by LOt-l2, to the east by Lot.9, III!d to tile SQuIh by a wry sti1f tavine over looking Cedar River. Mrs. :K.11eser has infumled me that the landslide liappeIled last ooopIe weeks ago. She notice that the hedges planted near1he edge of the elifJ' bas dropped to a certain leveL r notll:e that 6" perlbrated drrUnpJpe nms to the spot were the Iall(lsllde occumd. The drainpipe CQllccts all the roof dIain of the garage and it disclutrges water towards the clift It seems that there was a CQnIiJJnons landslide in the atta. Mrs. Kaeser identifiod SQI\lC ofthevegetationltre<:S that w= use to be a part oftheiryar4 I went down to the taVineby.1pptOX. 20'-30' to seta better view of the clift. I C\>Uldnot go furtbec dQW1J. due to heavy-vegetation. I observed that . the side slopo is soft, S$1urated and the s1idingfQt"lJded ate3.S were bare.' . r noticed another 4' pertOra1edpipe that~frl>mLot·9 and:rnns into the c1if[ I alsI.>observed a wateJ: flow IIllI!ks at the land slide/eroded 8lI:a indicating that there was surlh<:e water flowing into the ravine. I did not notice :my main drainage pipdine that outlefs to the:ravine at the spot were the continnous BII!alIlandslidc Is ocauring. The property ofMnl. Ka$lr is at the landslide zonellild east of the am was ~ RiverBlulfwere a big1andslide ooounedduringthel'ebI1lllIY 2001 "'Irthqualre. MIs. Kaeser hasinfurmedme that Lot-IO W3!I condemned and talqlIiyet oould.llQt lmiIton thelol She ulso added that when theybuiltthe garage, their ooil. expert recmmnended to the King County that the outlet of the roof drain will outlets to the ravine. Mr. Kaeser sbowed to me a metal pipe 4"-6" <liameter that was burled 554'ee1 deep vertically and showed to me that the water table is approx. 30· :fuel He said that it was installed to mef the pressure 'at the water table. It seems to be abandoned water well. Mr. and Mrs. Kaeser WlIIIis a I<>;hnicaI assistlu\ce to the problem. ~ NTS CB SE 146llf ST. ~ ____ ~ ______ ~~~ __ --~~ __ ~~~~ro~be~ i i / / f i / • I~~l·/ • I • • KAESER If 14223 i i l!J.,FNAnoN-DJoP I I • •...•........ -.~ STEEP RAVINE (REA VIL Y VEGETATED) House Lot-9 •••• 11 ...... 6'and4"~ perfoIli1ed dtain pipe (Seems to be aU the way down to the cliff) CONTINUOUS BR08ION/SLIDlNG (Some ~ azeas) , Mr~. LO. LVV? UN\) W WLKU 1.<.rNG COUNTY WATER AND LAND REsOURCES DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REpORT PROBLEM:,_4wn-~ . RECEIVEDBYC ~ Received from: LOCATION OF PROBLEM, IF DIPFER.llNT; lNVESTIOATION REQT.iEST Lot No: (Eve) \.-..( _-1) Block No: Other involved: ~ii~CJ- -=t"""-7 ParceINo.l'/(p3'fC:a:Yl7 KroIl'1;t{ s . ThBros: New t£2 A;X DISPOSITION: Turned to on _-,--/~ . .!-I _ by'_ OR: No further action recommended because: _ Lead agency has been.notified:_-:-______ --:-:::-___________ ~- _ Problem has been corrected. _ No problem has been'identified. _ Prior investigation addre$ses problem: SEE FILE # __ _ .11 Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: . l . Water originates on~ on neighboring parcel. DATE CLOSED: 11 OK-IO~ By: j. KING COUNTY DRAlNAG:t INVESTIGA nON REPORT FJELD INYESTIGATION NAME: ANN n .... uu ADDRESS; #13615 lS6TH AVE. SR, RENTON, 98059 PHONE: (425) 271~5016 DATE OF INVESTIGATION: 01~2:z..02 INVESTIGATED BY: Virgil Pacampara I went to tl1e 1.'eSidenoe of MIs. Anne Webb on 01122102 at 1 :30 PM 10 conduct a drairiage investigation. Her complaint was that sm:face water was IUIIIling down on 156" A'Ie. SE-and cuts across her driveway. As a result her yam was covered with JIIlld. That Manny from KC Roads lefcued her to WLRD (SWSS). Manny had her call Glenn EvanB (re: NDAP) and Glenn had her caJJ SWSS. That she believes that a berm may help her, but she doesn't want to dump evtlIylhing on her neigbbor. The ~ was fine during the investigation. The property of MIs. Webb are bounded by the following: To the east by 156" Ave. SR., to south by SE 137m St, to the west by Lot46, and to north by Lot-I. The propeny of MIs. Webb is located on a grndnJU sloping tenain from north to 50Uth direction. The driveway of MIs. Webb. seems to 00 collecli.ng swface water from the west shoulder of l~Ci" Ave. SE., flows towards driveway and unto the front yard and percolates. I notice traces otwater at the driveway ofM!s. Webb.lIer conccm was the flooding at their walkway, that it was very slippezy, that she is concern ofher sakty being at the pregnancy stage, that watlts to get rid of the deposits of mud, gravel and sand at the fumt yard s~t by the water during stonn events. She wan.ts that something tan be done to ,limiDam the run-on: She.said that they moVQo'iu On Nov. 200 1 and the house inspection report showed that there was water at ::a.auwl splice. I went inside the Claw! space and lIOtice it was damp and wet, but r ~ not see a standing wster or 1 pooling in the Lot46 .~~ ~ Driveway SE137m ST. Webb #1361S Mud, gravel, IIDd sand 3"-4" inlet NU. Db 1 .~ MI 1\. LO. LVV) J:~LrIVI ~111~ \'v. WLKU --. ~ KING COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURC:ES DMSION 1--f1('? DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REpORT PROBLEM: Fe 1><:> ...... 1:> RECEIVED BY: Received from: Kc DOl NAME: o y/,-o p-I K GN ~TIGATIONREQ~ oJ.,1 s ,TL 2.r 10' o~ OK'd b : FILENo. (Day) (If'2-S) PHONE Z.') ~ -f3.G. 7 (Eve) l.-( _---!l ADDRESS: 1491...,0 1]9",,,,,PL S£:;. City State __ Zip __ _ LoCATION OF PROBLEM, IF DlFFERENT: /f./o05; _ '. 1?t9~ PL se Access Permission Granted 0 Call First (Would Like To Be Present) 0 p~~~~ ~J~~~~Or" I ~--6 ~ ~ Lot No; Block No: City ___ Charge No, ______ -----'-_ REsPoNSE: Citizen notified on ______ by: __ phone __ letter __ in person ; .. DISPOSITION: Turned to _ on / ! by __ OR: No further action recommended because: . -XlLead agency has beea notified.: i? o.A>v 5" vI/1A-lJT;. 5 (!:R= //Iz.--eJ ts _ Problem has been corrected. _ No problem has been identified, _'_ Pdor investigationaddresscs problem; SEE FlLE # __ _ _ Private problem· NDAP will not consider becalliie; Water or* onsite ~eighhoring parceL .TE CLOSED: t/) 1.fi/;3 By: _~.:;: __ Other (SpeoifY); Priority: 4 -------------.. -.-----.-----------...:-----...:~~ Facility: Briar Hilts #4 (090515) 14005 149th PI SE Maintenance Di'\risto~ Thomas eros Map; Checked: 2120/2003 Andrew MCDonar~ ~ Dlivfng Direetions ! From S£:.128111 st, take 144th Ave. SE_ go South. Tum left onto SE. 142nd st. tum left onto 149th pi, SE. the pond is on the left al house # 14005_ Speci;>1 Equipment: WLRD Notes! Date! Num Task Not. Units Ami Innials rM22 I Clean Conveyance Remove sediment from the following catch basin(s): CB·2. I ea I .1 CBIMH CS/CB-1 I 1 MU 1-C'~~$OO Remove sediment from the following conveyance plpe(s) at the J System (pipe) following 10caDon(.) and dispose_ of sediment in accordanee with applicable regUlations: Pond to CSfCB-1 Pond to CS/CB.1-Pipe : Pipe filled with rock and sediment at CS/CB-1 end. -tr~~ m,' .,' """''' I T05·M I Miscellaneous Maintenance Authorized By ; Wor\( Completed By: WA# 20745 J Pick Up and remove all debris from access road. Dispose of material offaite. Access Road: Clean tree limbs lila! have fallen around pond and any other vegetative debris. R~move length of 30' Pipe left along fence line at soutl1em end I F~ciljt I lJ of tract .,-'-,~ Date Date Page 1 of1 212012003 I~ V. L LUI f. U V /il 1\. LO. lVV'J --, .' r J.'tLfIYI f\11~1J \iV. I1LI\U KiNG COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DMSlON DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REpORT --vpr PROBLEM:~ RECEIVED BY: ct Recei ved from: INVESnGATIONREQUEST Type (Z.,C ,I ( /0/2-7 Date:f/2p;;(f') OK'd by: -Tt_ FILENo. 2003 -020')- (Day) ( ) (Eve) l.-( _-') PHONE 'J9tz -7715 ---S:... . -""-r«-R Parcel No./02-3DS207s'''' Kroll "60;) ThBr~s: New b2C,W J RDP Basiu 1'1 It( Council Distdct 0 City Clmtge No " ______ _ REsPONSE: Citi~ notified on . by: _ phone __ letter _ in person . ~~~~€~~~~~~p~~~' " _ ~fU.f A1-ltJ fot"vI,U~.sbt-11iJt!& ~rJ I~!::() pP ~ ~~~ DISPOSITION: Turned to on _.!-I_L-I _ by_-OR: No further action recot\:llllended because: _ L~ad agency has beennotified: ____________________ ~- _ Problem has been corrected. _ No problem has been identified. _ Prior inv~tion addresses problem: -S.EEFILE # ~ Private problem ... NDAP will not consider because: --- . Water originates omite ~eipJJ.boring parce!. ( uATECLOSED: 12r2403 By: - >~~M ~1/t:S7\l7, KING CO WLRD ' " ' '" , " "," ", ,," f,,·,NO, 2261 . ,,," " ArK, ld, lUU')' 3:43PM'" ~ "':", ""~"";""'~""~ ,,' ',J", "~'."',' ,;~,~,,'>.,\<,,:.;!';,,,,;,,,.,,,.,,,,, , '.\,. r '\., ... .< \.''<''.f::~'$\.'",~,j' c.' :IoJ~lf !~r "l, "H· J.~"~,~(:~/' . ~! ~ . FlU! NO., 2003-00702 * KING COUNTY NAME: MaryAnn Amundson ADDRESS: KC Roads ' PHONE: (206) 296-7715 DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT FIELD ~TIGATION DATE OF INVESTIGATION: 10-22-03 INVESTIGATED BY: Virgil Pacampara I went to the :resid~ ofMI-. Bobbi Lane to investigate a drainage problem on 10/30/03 at 3 ,00 PM The complaint was that during the storm event on 10/20/03, Ms. Bobbi Lane reported. fIoo<Iing., Ms. Lane lives inside the City of Renton. The City of Renton believes that the dxainage problOOJ. originates from off ROW con~ce at the MLK Baptist CbnIch. Mary Ann Amnndson of KC Roads responded to the call at aroPDdI 0:00 PM and noted tba1 the ROW conveyance was near capacity but not ovexflowing-. I met Mr. Lane and spoke to him about the dtainage complaint She showed to me the spot were the water flows ftom the swale/pond of MLK Baptist Church and Ibe'location wm the waler entered his property, He also mentioned that the water level at the pond is high. During the investigation. we met Mr. Kc;ggen of Santana Constmction. Mr. Keggen is the project lead of the on-going construction project oiNE 10th St and Anarortes Ave. He mentioned that they took I1tI old <;atch basin at the intersection of Anacortes and lOth street. The water has risen in the area dnrlng the storm ev'eIlts and water was shooting up with no a=ss for the ~ater. He said that they have insWled recently a new catch basin located at the NE comer to replace the old one. They are replacing the existing conveyance pipes alODg 10" Street with from 12-inch to IS·inch pipe and along Anaoortes with new 36-inch pipe line. Be mentioned that he spoke to the MLK personnel Witlaegards to their (MI.K) drainage problem. He told them to wait until the project is finished, that it may solve the drainage problem in the area. I .spoke to Maly Ann Amundson over the phone about the flooding dming the >1= events. Slw told me that the pondlswale is rutming in full capacity at the time slw was at site (appl'Ol<-10:00'PM). The water is not overJIowing the banks. The street (downstream) was flooded and City QfRenton was Plll!JPing out the -water at the construction site. She believes that the constt1IClion in the area and the stee1 plates lias contriboted to the prol)lem (all With in City of Renton). It ~ that the water at the pond!swale has risen in full capacity due to high intensity of the rainlllJItwater runoff at the huge asphalt . SUJface parking lot It has impacted the flow from the swale/pond towards the control structure. The on-going construction along the . 10m StI«! and Anacortes has impacted and restricted the water flows from pond/ditch ofMLK Church towards downstream (Anacortes). A related COinplaint was recorded (1996·2033 Dotson), water flows from paved p;lIking lot of the church onto roadway then <into sevenIl nl'OT"lt':1tiec;o . KING COUNTY JUlUSDlCUON _ .. -..... --. __ .. _-.. -... -- CITY OF RENTON Pipe to be replalled wm 12·inch to 18.inchper Mr. Keggen Infurmation .Pipe to be replaced from existingpipe to 36-inch, ~- ,,.. ."}. : i I I I I MLK CHURCH PROPERTY e ~~:.-.-o-=----=-~~~~.-.--.l---.. -... _----.. ----.7 . ' ..... . !~. Reside.ntial Houses i Lane 1'! ! #9SR IN)! Sutface water entered here pet Mr. Lane infonnation. iJl \!Vi .. · .. ······B;;;;;;;;'C;;;;·(;n;;·;;;;){f)···· ........ 'f"·~t.· !>~-----' ................... ~ ... , .... _ .. U .... _ ••••••• II ••• _ .............. ® .. Residential Houses ,-------..., Roadway was flooded dnrlng the stonn events per Anllmdson information. ·MrK. Ld. LUUJ J:4HM KlNli CU. WLRD NO. 2261 KiNG COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISION P. 62M ';':S I'f~~ (v ' DRAINAGE INvESTIGATION REpORT INVESTIGATION REQUEST , PR08LEM;~ . RECE/VEDBY: LG Date: II krJo 3 OK'd by: FILENo. 2003 ~0fJ..I Received from: { 1 (Day) &/~ PHONE 62,'JS ..... "%:~ 0 3> (Eve) ( ) , City ~ State, __ Zip 9t05b LoCATION OF PROBLEM, If DIFfERENT: l3~ (]A? se Access Permission Granted 0 Call First (Would Like To Be Present) 0 S75-CIJAA. t5JVr !Sul'-b t.tp J.u J;i)f/'/) 5/iJ>~ tDj''''H· f',.",/) Wfl1 f)RIt',w)V4) ~"'J ""rt'l:'r C. t l'-'Itti? ''''1'' P /513te.'S , 1711-J..I1~ I'E 1'''' (J ttf/fA/ ~""",. (7jJj115. ,(jISt'>:) 5-Rii ItT r/N /i'E0 . ffi/oCJ ( , Plat ruune: ~ . R.o;nt)il/JJ Lot No: Block No: No .• !!:i32~>naQ KroIlWtJ Th.Bros: New 6J6f.{) RDP Basin LfJI.-:. Council District & City ___ Charge No .. _______ _ REsPONSE: Citizen notified on 71~/B·oj by: __ phone __ letter -X.. in person /.'(;:r~m"tr;--N /<J<I"W 'fH~c WA?)/., !3(.()~HI1;;,r;: /# ,FL.r>'<J (J1[)>vT~OC. .t7tt!.Jl,,}rI, 'S/ii)/M'(5?wy I~ :Dlr~/i ~Jo.lo.u#J t!/.IPstytJ rb tu/,4-tI'7..D <'f1J5!.--z.. DISPOSITION' Twned to __ on I I by __ OR: No further action recoounended becaus~: :)£ Lead agency has been notified: Rd ~ S M.4/,J-r. s"flcc{/u ... -Q(>5. . , • __ Problem has been corrected. __ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigllp,on'addt'esses problem: SEE J!'lIX # __ _ __ Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: Water originates onsite ~rPbOring parceL __ Other (SpecifY): .tJATECLOSED: 111Z-.8z03 By: KING COUNTY bepartment of Natural Resources FILENO. NAME KAREN SAMSON 13812 -SE 121 sT ST y, b j Water and land Resource Division ADDRESS PHO~ 425-235-8363 Til PAGE _6;..Z_G_-H_7 __ _ 805W 11-21-{)3 DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT FIELD INVESTIGATION DETAILS 01<' INVESTIGATION: ----DATE KROLL PAGE MAINT. DIVISION 2 INITIALS _ MAM COMPLAINT STATES: FAOIlITY FUll. OF WATER CONCERNED PIPE MAY BE BLOCKED. SITE VISIT ON 11-18-03. INVeSTIGATION FOUND FACILITY 091091 WAS FUll. OF WATER. CHECKED THE CONTROL STRUCTURE AND FOUND IT TO BE IN OVERfLOW. OlJTLET FROM CONTROL STRUCTURE IS TO ROADSIDE DrrcH AND WAS PARTIALLY BLOCKED WiTH DEBRIS IN DITCH. CLEANED OUT PIPE END IN DITCH TO ALLOW FACILITY TO DRAIN. TRASH RACK IN BOTTOM OF POND WAS NOT BLOOKED. DID FIND THE CLEAN-OUT GATE TO THE CONTROL STRUOTURE HAD COME OFF AND WAS HANGING IN THE CATCH BASIN. WiLL PREPARE A WORK AUTHORIZATION TO HAVE THIS REPAIRED. SPOKE WiTH THE COMPLAINANT AND LET THEM KNOW FACILITY HAD PARTIAL BLOCKAGE AT OUTler WHICH WAS REMOVED AND FLOWS SHOULD GO DOWN IN THE FACILITY. COMPLAINT CLOSED TO WA #20975-112. NO PHOTOS TAKEN Ul CIl W SKET ~ ~ M ... SE 118TH ST HOIJSe 13&12 w CIl ~ X 1-' <0 M ..... ;!Jo' ROW AND DRAlHAQ& EASEMENT NTS Me ,. LO. LVVJ ...----- ~JNIJ lV. WLKU NO. 2261 lONG COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DMSION DRAINAGE INvESTIGATION REpORT INVESTIGATION REQUEST PROBLEM: ])f2J,-t "-'t+4<£ "fv' P. 64 '-' m~q • Type rCR., REcEIVED BY; L <:;;t;--rv ~ Received from; Date: II l,t03 OK'd by: FILE No. 2003 -(fff{s _ (Day) ri?S) (Eve) l-(_-' NAME: Kel0 7/tyL.CJe PHONE 235-43' 7 ADDRESS: /4-120 5c /~ ,PL City ~.:;/N StateWIl Zip 'lJPS:J LOCATION OF PROBLEM, IF DIFFERENT: Access Permissi<!II Granted 0 , .' ('. . . , f ; Call First (Would Like To Be Present) 0 1Jac?.0t7#l~ r .. Plat name: 09ost5 ~~=t1t1 Lot No:. Block No: s T ThBros: New 6sex 1,3 v RDP BasIn Ii)., _ Council District 12 City Charge No. __ ~ ___ _ ~: Citizen notified on nd ~ by; ~ phone __ letter _lnperson LY~ ~~l~ ~';'~:'~P~ 0)~1>--S ~~ (fkif ~ Sp~ ~,~,~ . lVMr. F{pp~ '::fr, k-if DISPOSITION: Turned to _ on _-',_...L/------:-_ by __ OR: No further action recommended because: _ Lead agency has been notified;,_~,---------,--___ '_' .:.:c--.:...,-~ •. _____________ _ _ Problem hIlS been corrected. _ No problem has been identified, __ Prior investigation addresses problem: ?(1 SEE FlLli: # ~ Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: . Water originates omite an'!!:l~/!eif!}lbOrins parcel. OATE CLOSED: / Z-T 1/ t'3 BY:-1fP'<I J vvtfJ fl!.e't'tdS~) KING COUNTY DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT FIELD IN.VESTIGATION NAME: Ken Taylor ADDRESS: 14920 SE 139 th PI, Renton, 98059 PHONE: 425·235-4367 . TH. BROS PG: 656J3 KROLL PAGE: 811 MAINT.DN:4 INITIALS:MAG On site D~lDber 5, 2003. A.t the time of my visit it was precipitating heavily and the pond and controlstrllcture Were working at well. The inlet to the control structure had some moderate debris on the trash rack. This debris did not disrupt flow ta the controlstructu.re. The inlet to the pond was running at normal CJIpacity for the conditions at the time of inspection. The Emergency spillway for this pond spUIs over the control structure onto 149~ PL SE. On NovembeJ:' 19, 2003 the area experienced sigllificllnt precipitation. I could find no defects at the time of my inspection to indicate a blockage in the control structuJ:e or catch basins down stream (J:'om this facility. SE 139thPI· ) ( TopoZonc -The Web's Topographic Map o 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 km o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 rni Map center is UTM 10 563458E 5257030N (WGS84!NAD83) Renton quadrangle Projection is UTM Zone 10 NAD83 Datum ~·1=18.036 [;=0.52 -----~~--~ ~ Shy Creek -Level 1 Downstream Analysis 4 Task 5: Mitigation of Existing or Potential Problems 4.1 Drainage Concept The proposed drainage system will consist of a standard curb, gutter and sidewalk roadway section with catch basins for the interception of runoff associated with onsite areas. The runoff is tied into a proposed conveyance system which in tum will discharge into the water quality/detention facility located near the southwestern boundary of the site. All conveyance, flow control, and water quality systems wiIl be sized per the 1998 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual requirements. Drainage will be released from the detention pond by means of the Level 2 Flow Control and treated under the Basic Water Quality Menu. 4.2 Specific Problem Mitigation 4.2.1 Floodplain Analysis A "Shy Creek Development Floodplain Analysis" (January 11, 2006) was completed by Montgomery Water Group, Inc. for this site. HEC-RAS Modeling was used for floodplain analysis and is included at the end ofthis section. December 15, 2005 Job No. 03-185 Page 4-1 -"""', • / Basin: Cedar River ISymbo Drainage Component Type Name, Size Type: sheet, swale, see map stream, channel, pipe, pond; Size: diameter, surface area ditch flow nla nla culvert nla channel flow L.... ---- OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE Surface Water Design Manual, Core Requirement #2 Subbasin Name: Lower Cedar River Drainage Component Slope Distance Existing Potential Description from site Problems Problems discharge constrictions, under capacity, ponding drainage basin, vegetation, % 1/4 mi = 1320 overtopping, flooding,habitat or organism cover, depth, type of sensitive destruction, scouring, bank sloughing, area, volume sedimentation, incision, other erosion Analysed by Monlgomery Water Group. See Section 4 2.0% 0'-400' None None 48" CMP Pipe 2.0% 400'-450' None None wide, vegetated ravine called varies 450'-2000' or None None Maplewood Creek more ---------1--.------------------ Triad Associates Subbasin Number: Observations of field inspector resource reviewer) or resident tributary area, likelihood of problem, overflow pathways, potential impacts. Analysed by Montgomery Water Group. i See Section 4 , Trash Rack was damaged on south end outletting to Maplewood Creek None - N019NIHS'ttM 'N01N31J d O All:) ~ ~ ~. • S ! i ! ti § ~ " ~ i l i~'1 )f33H~ AHS ~ hl ~ . "~"~~.~ •• ).NtldWO :J S3WOH tJ3NNO :J r'l l /~~ ~i;~ I ~n1~··~ 11i ~ u • I; ~ ~ "~ .<(is..j ~~g ~ I'ql"x 3 !tel/nO ~~ ~~T ' u ~A SOIS1,~ aLV<! ·or: ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tenJdaouo:J pue SU0 !l!PUO J padOlalt a a :llfO :}.g d1iI.lJ .UlI ;~ '.' '--=l I ®~I I '~I L __ -.1 r --j Q~ L __ .J I --i I i1l ~' ~~ L __ .J '--:-I I ~~, __ .J , I ~~' '" ~ I L __ .J '--I I ~Iill ' I ~...: I '-__ .-1 ,--:-I ! ~~' ~~ I L __ .J '--I :;~: I 3 /1 -1-'. {J.~311J.S ONeCJ 3$1 J33I1J.$ ONZ ~ ,--- : ~~ L __ _ ,--- , ~~ L __ _ : ~[[j] , ;;~ L _____ ------- ~~ "-'-' ~ -,' 'i ---1---',--- ~ 1'1 1d.I " ~ i I I 1:'i~1 I I I I , ....... ", .. ' ---- !!~, ----I -----1 , ~~' , I ~~ -~ I , , .... ~~ ----~ , ----I r ---- ~[[j]' ~~~ -~~ I , L ____ ~~ L ____ ---l r----- ~~ , ~~ I I (.J.3iIlJiS H.JPCl 38/ 13311.1.8 ONe 35 I , " , --,1 r---, ~~I ! I ~~ -[[j] .... ~ ---- ~~ ~~ "'~ ------ ------ ~[[j] ------ ~~ ------ ------- ~~ ,- " , .- ,- '1 I I 1 I I I ,= ._ ..... ) ... '~·l ·'··'<1 It) ~ ~ 0 0 ~~ I CO) .~ <:;) ~~ "~ " !l Vl iil " ~ II! .. ~ ~ ;; SCALE: 1" = 120' o 60 120 240 ~ ! 8-12 Wetland Inc. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OJ= R~NTON CONNERHOMES-SHYCREEK CITY OF RENTON WETLAND ANALYSIS REPORT B·12 Wetland Consulting, Inc. 1103 W Meeker Street, Suite C Kent WA 98032 Prepared For: Conner homes 846 10Sth Avenue NE Bellevue, Washington 98004 Attn: John Skochdopole January 18, 2006 MAR 222006 RECEIVED Phone: 253·859·0515 Fax 253·852-4732 8-12 Wetland Consulti Inc. 1103 W. Meeker St K8l1\ WA'5llQ-5151 CONNER HOMES -SHY CREEK CITY OF RENTON WETLAND ANALYSIS REPORT 1.0 INTRODUCTION (v)253B5&0515 (~ 253-<3524732 This report describes jurisdictional wetlands and streams on the proposed Shy Creek Plat located on the west side of Jericho Avenue NE south of SE 132 nd Street in the City of Renton, Washington (the "site"). Specifically the site is a rectangular shaped assemblage of parcels bordered by Jericho Avenue on the east, SE 132nd Street on the north, 142no Avenue SE on the west, and SE 136th Street on the south. Thomas Guide Vicinity Map A Sewall Wetland Consulting. Inc Company 1.1 Proposed Project Carmer Shy CreekJ#AS-306 B-12 Wetland Consul'lIlg, illc. January 18, 2006 Page 2 of8 The proposed project is the construction of a 61 lot subdivision with associated paved roads, open space areas and stonnwater facilities. The project contains one Class 4 stream and one small Category 3 wetland, 2.0 METHODOLOGY Ed Sewall and Shannon Stragier of B-12 Wetland Consulting, Inc. identified and flagged the wetlands on the site on October 18, 2005, A combination of field indicators, including vegetation, soils, and hydrology was used to detennine the presence of wetlands. The methodology used to identify any jurisdictional wetlands on the site is described in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (WADOE, March 1997). This is the methodology currently recognized by King County, and the State of Washington for wetland determinations and delineations. The wetland areas identified would also be considered wetlands using the methodology described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987), as required by the US Anny Corps of Engineers. The Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual and the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual both require the use of the three-parameter approach in identifying and delineating wetlands. A wetland should support a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, have hydric soils and display wetland hydrology. To be considered hydrophytic vegetation, over 50% of the dominant species in an area must have an indicator status of facultative (FAC), facultative wetland (FACW), or obligate wetland (OBL), according to the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9) (Reed, 1988). A hydric soil is "a soil that is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part". Anaerobic conditions are indicated in the field by soils with low chromas (2 or less), as detennined by using the Munsell Soil Color Charts; iron oxide mottles; hydrogen sulfide odor and other indicators. Generally, wetland hydrology is defmed by inundation or saturation to the surface for a consecutive period of 12,5% or greater of the growing season. Areas that contain indicators of wetland hydrology between 5%- 12.5% of the growing season mayor may not be wetlands depending upon other indicators. Field indicators include visual observation of soil inundation, saturation, oxidized rhizospheres:water marks on trees or Conner Shy CreekJ#A5~306 B~12 Wetland Consulting, Inc January 18, 2006 Pase J of8 other fixed objects, drift lines, etc. Under nonnal circumstances, indicators of all three parameters will be present in wetland areas. Streams would be identified by the presence of a defined channel that contains flowing surface water at some time of the year. 3.0 OBSERVATIONS 3.1 Existing Site Documentation Prior to visiting the site, a review of several natural resource inventory maps was conducted. Resources reviewed included the King County Soil Survey, King County iMap wetland and stream inventory web-site and the National Wetland Inventory. 3.1.1 King County Soil Survey According to the King County Soil Survey the site contains Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AgC) which typically occurs on slopes of 6-15 percent. Alderwood gravelly sandy loam soils are moderately well- drained soils and are formed under conifers, in glacial deposits. According to the publication" Hydric soils of the United States" Alderwood soils are not considered hydric or wetland soils. 3.1.2 King County iMap website Conner Shy Creekl#A5~306 8-12 Wetland Consulting, Inc. January 18, 2006 Page 4 of8 According to the King County iMap website, the only sensitive area on the site is a stream crossing the southwest comer of the site. 3.1.3 National Wetland Inventory According to the National Wetland Inventory there are no wetlands or streams on the site. . \ -~ .. 3.3 Uplands .. . ' . . ; ~ -~ ~1:··J\· . .. • ~ .. :::. I : • , '. I. I I 'h Conner Shy Creekl!A5-106 B-12 Wetland Consulting. Ine. January 18,2006 Page 5 0[8 The majority of the site is grazed pasture that has been used to graze exotic deer. The site has rolling topography that is generally higher on the east than the west, and is dominated by an east-west oriented linear depression containing a small stream that flows from east to west. A large single family home is located on the southern half of the site as well as one small rental home on the southern end of the site. The pasture area contains a mix of tall fescue (Festuca arnndinacea), bentgrass (Agrostis spp.), scotch broom (Cystisus scoparius), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum) and scattered patches of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor). Additionally, red alder (Alnus rnbra), Douglas fir (Psuedotsuga menziesi!)and a few Scouler's willow (Salix scouleriana) are present. Soil pits excavated within the upland revealed an 8" A-horizon comprised of gravelly loam with a soil color of 10YR 2/2 over a B-horizon of gravelly loam with a color of lOYR %. Soil pits excavated within the upland areas were dry within 12 inches of the soil surface. Conner Shy Creeki#A5·306 8·12 Wetland Consulting, Inc. January 18,2006 Page 6 of8 Topogmphical view of site as viewed looking north. 3.4 Wetlands/streams Streams As previously described, a single stream flows from east to west through the center of the site. There is no stream in the location depicted on the King County iMap aerial photograph as shown on Page 4 of this report. The stream on-site is an intermittent non-fish bearing stream that has been classified by the City of Renton as a Class 4 stream. The ordinary high water mark of this stream was surveyed and placed upon the site plan. Class 4 streams typically have a 35' buffer measured from the ordinary high water mark. Wetland A small riparian wetland (3,759sl) was delineated bordering the eastern portion of the stream on the site. This wetland was flagged with pink flags labeled S lA-S6A and S I-S6. This wetland is an emergent wetland dominated by a mix of bluegrass, soft rush, and bentgrass. Soil pits excavated within this wetland revealed an 8" A-horizon comprised of gravelly loam with a soil color of 10YR 2/2, The underlying Conner Shy Creekl#A5-306 B-12 Wetland Consulting, Inc. January 18,2006 Page 7 or8 B-horizon is comprised of gravelly loam with a soil color of 10YR 2/1 that was moist during our site visit. According to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) wetland classification method (Cowardin et al. 1979), Wetland A would be classified as palustrine, emergent, persistent, seasonally flooded (PEMIC). This wetland has very little functional value other than to store a minor amount of stream overflow during any flooding that would occur along this channel. The habitat value of the stream has been degraded from ongoing mowing and grazing. The main value of this wetland is its flood storage capacity which may help alleviate some downstream flooding. This wetland best meets the criteria of a Category 3 wetland due to small size, high degree of disturbance from soil compaction and grazing of exotic deer and lack of any unique features. Typically, Category 3 wetlands have a 25' buffer measured from the wetland edge. 4.0 PROPOSED PROJECT Impacts The proposed project is the construction of a 61 lot subdivision. The proposed road crossings of the site will require impacting both the creek and a portion (1, 713sl) of wetland. These impacts are allowed with appropriate mitigation as described by Code. In addition, the 35' buffer of the Class 4 stream is proposed to be reduced to 25' as allowed by Code with enhancement. Concept Mitigation The road crossings will require placement of an appropriate size culvert. To compensate for the impact to 1, 713sf of Category 3 wetland, 1, 733sf of wetland will be created to the west of the eastern road crossing along the sides of the channel. This creation will involve excavating down the area to create wetland hydrologic conditions and maintain the existing storage capacity of the wetland for floodwater, and then following soil amendments if needed, replanting with a mix of native trees and shrubs. In addition, the rest of the wetland will be enhanced (2,046sl) with native plantings and some habitat features such as large logs. COMer Shy Creekl#A5-306 B~12 Wetland Consulting, Inc January 18,2006 Page 8 of8 To compensate for the reduced stream buffer, the entire buffer of the stream will be enhanced through the installation of native trees and shrubs as well as large woody debris in and along the stream channeL The result of the proposed mitigation is no net loss of existing wetland function (floodwater storage capacity) and a large increase in habitat function as the entire buffer and stream channel will be planted with native trees and shrubs and exotic deer will be removed, The removal of the deer will eliminate nutrients from animal waste entering the stream as well as eliminate the browsing of vegetation, The woody vegetation to be planted will restore a native plant community to the riparian area and provide a source of woody debris and invertebrate substrate for the stream channel as well as shade and cool the water in the channel which will benefit off-site, downstream areas of the tributary that do contain fish. The proposed mitigation area would be monitored for 3 years to determine the success of the mitigation, Following approval of this concept plan, a detailed Final Mitigation Plan will be prepared and submitted to the City for approvaL If you have any questions or need any additional information please contact our office at 253.859,0515 or bye-mail ated@bI2assoc.com Sincerely, B-12 Wetland Consulting, Inc, Ed Sewall Senior Wetland Ecologist PG. 101 + N88"21'13"W 600.62' I ---, ~ ------~. ---------------5-BA 5-7 5-6 -------. ---. ----S-7A + I I I I I I I I I I I I--~ i 5-5 w. END 24" CONC IE=401.5 (APPROX) STREAM BOUNDARY FLAG (TYP.) @ N. END 12" CONG 1£=404.5 ~ ;;:; 12" CONC END 24" CC N 5 N. END 12" CB IE 12" /IJ IE 18" /IJ ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (Washillgtoll State Wetlallds Idelltificatioll & Delilleatioll Mallual, 1997) B-12 WETLAND CONSULTING, INC. 1103 West Meeker Street Kent, Washington 98032 (253) 859-0515 Mt'/f- Project Name!#: «'7 (C"U Date: 10-2(;-6':;-Investigator: » ~ Data Point: D P, - Jurisdiction: ~f--? _____ State: v--.-d Atypical Analysis: Problem Area: VEGETATION Dominant plant species Stratum Indicator Coverage % I. J...,.'"--'( 1-';' ~,rr:_ ~~-s H rAe I-j 2. ~ ... ~ Ii-~c 3. A~ _" Tr f .. /,A ,..{ P4<-.------ 4. .-~,- 5 -----_. _._- 6. ------ 7. 8. ---------~- 9. 10. .--------------~- % of species om .. FAC\\' amLor FAC: /<70 )Iydrophytlc vegetation cnteria ntffMNo Marginal •. _-------- Conunents' .. _-----" ;f-'/,t.., ....J SOILS Mapped Soil Senes: On Hydric Soils List?: Yes ® Drainage Class: Deplh(O il1) A!atnx color Rcc/ux concC'ntration colar Tex/lire .il':in. /C'(,c 1-11. .-,._-- Lt,.in Ltl'll! "Z.-/ I ->~ 7_-....... 10. ._-_ .. ----------,----------- Ill. ------~-----, - Organic 50il_, Histic epipedon __ , Hydrogen sulflde_, glt:yed_, redox c()lIcenlratioIlS __ , redox dcpletions_, pore linings __ ' iron concretions _, manganese concretions _' urganic matter in sra/ace horizon (salldy soil) , organic streakmg (sandy soils)_, organic pall (sand.v soil)_. t'"Cv-t> "'-"-of ) Hydric solI criteria met;@No Basis: .---------._---- Conunents: ._-- HYDROLOGY Recorded data -' intlndation , saturation ----H'Qlcrmarks ___ , drift lil2cs ___ , sediment deposifs ___ , drainage patferns '" j ~ v,...~,J /~~ .. L"~ , Wetland hydrology criteria met:@No Basis: "'-''f $<,., JG<-.I Comments' --_.- S~ARY OF CRITERIA Soil Temp. at 19.7" dep~ Growing Season o. Hydrophytic vegetation: Hydric SOiIS:~~~drology:~ Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional wetland?' e 0 ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (Washillgtoll State Wetlallds Idelltificatioll & Delilleatioll Mallllal, 1997) Project Name/#: Jurisdiction: Dominant pJi.lnt species 1. r' (;J ..... 2, /to"! ~.f 3, __ {'I:'JI~ (P""-v-l-t- B-l2 WETLAND CONSULTING, INC 1103 West Meeker Street Kent, Washington 98032 (253) 859-0515 Date: )0 -;>t::J -0"\ Investigator: 5~~ __ State: VV -+ Atypical Analysis: Stratum VEGETATION Indicator .,t:=-~ ( $~"'J"G1 Data Point: ])17 Z Problem Area: Coverage % 4, __________________ , ________________________ _ 5, ______________________ ~_, ________________ _ 6,, _______ ~~ __ ~~ ___ ~~~ ________ ~~~~ __ ~ _~~~~~~_ 7, __________________________ ~ __________ ~ 8, _________________ _ 9, _____ _ ------------------------10,_, __________ _ % of species 013L F ACW <lIH.t/or FAC: W~V ___ Hydrophytic ycgetation criteria ~'\!o i\.larginal ________ _ Comments: __________________ _ ---------------------------~ --~~- SOILS M<lpped Soil Series: ___ A{._,,~"_'_'_ ...... __'__':_d_'_ __ On Hydric Soils L15C:~Dra[[1age ("1<155: ______________ _ Depih(U in) Matrix c%r Redox concelllratioJl color Tl.!xtllre l~n _____________ ~/_o~y~~~-c~~/~l~--------- Lkin, __________ ) t>yn 3/-4 ________ -:,~;.;p.;-;;;;;2:;==/.-=~=-,---_~.-_'===== _tn, __________________________________ _ _ In. -~---~~' .. C----C--C--------:------- Organic soil_. lIislie epipedoll_. Hydrogen sulfide _, g!eyed_, redox COllcentratlOlu'_, redox depletions. ' porI! lilllngs_, iroll concreliol1s __ , mangallf!se cOllcr{!(W1l5< . organic matter ill sUI/ace horizon (s(1ndr soil) ___ ' organic streaking (.wn(~v soils) __ organic pan (satldy soil)_ Hydric soil criteria met: y~s VBasis: ____ -Lly"-' ... "'-_--"},..),,~,_',_.=_:,,'_'_I"":::...:.r'__'r'_ ____________ , ______ _ Comments: ________________________ ~, ____ , _________ _ HYDROLOGY Recorded data _' inundation ___ ' saturation _ .. _ ,watermarks , dnit liIlI!S ___ , sf'c/iment deposits ___ , drainage patterns __ _ Wetland hydrology critena met: Yes @ Basis: Conunents: _____________ , ______ ~ ________________________ __ SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Soil Temp, at 19,7" depth: Growtng Season?:~ Hydrophytic vegetation:.&!'! Hydric sorls:J::&S:/Nctland ~rology: YLllI Data point meets the criteria of a jUIlsdictlOnal wetland?: Yes~ ~~ .~<. ,,:'., B-12 Wetland CONNERHOMES-SHYCREEK CITY OF RENTON REVISED WETLAND ANALYSIS REPORT 13-12 Wetland Consulting, me. 1103 W. Meeker Street, Suite C Kent W A 98032 Prepared For: Conner homes 846 108'" Avenue NE Bellevue, Washington 98004 Attn: John Skochdopole May 9, 2006 Job#A5-306 Inc. Phone: 253-859-0515 Fax: 253-852-4732 8-12 Wetland Inc. 1103 W. Meeker St Kent. WA 9f!i132-'S1S1 (v)253-85S{)S15 (n 253-8524732 CONNER HOMES -SHY CREEK CITY OF RENTON REVISED WETLAND ANALYSIS REPORT 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report describes jurisdictional wetlands and streams on the proposed Shy Creek Plat located on the west side of Jericho Avenue NE south of SE l32nd Street in the City of Renton, Washington (the "site"). Specifically the site is a rectangular shaped assemblage of parcels bordered by Jericho Avenue on the east, SE 132 nd Street on the north, 142nd Avenue SE on the west, and SE 136th Street on the south. • -w T1wmas Guide Vicinity Map 1.1 Proposed Project SE The proposed project is the construction of a 61 lot subdivision with associated paved roads, open space areas and stormwater facilities. A Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. Company Conner Shy CreekJ#A5-306 B-12 Wetland Consulting, Inc. May 9, 2006 Page 2 of 11 The project contains one Class 4 stream and four small Category 3 wetlands. 2.0 METHODOLOGY Ed Sewall and Shannon Stragier of B-12 Wetland Consulting, Inc. identified and flagged the wetlands on the site on October 18, 2005, Following comments from the City on potential areas of wetland not identified in the original wetland report, we conducted additional site visits on May 1 and May2, 2006. A combination of field indicators, including vegetation, soils, and hydrology was used to determine the presence of wetlands. The methodology used to identify any jurisdictional wetlands on the site is described in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (W ADOE, March 1997). This is the methodology currently recognized by King County, and the State of Washington for wetland determinations and delineations. The wetland areas identified would also be considered wetlands using the methodology described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987), as required by the US Army Corps of Engineers. The Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual and the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual both require the use of the three-parameter approach in identifying and delineating wetlands. A wetland should support a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, have hydric soils and display wetland hydrology. To be considered hydrophytic vegetation, over 50% of the dominant species in an area must have an indicator status offacultative (FAC), facultative wetland (FACW), or obligate wetland (OBL), according to the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9) (Reed, 1988). A hydric soil is "a soil that is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part". Anaerobic conditions are indicated in the field by soils with low chromas (2 or less), as determined by using the Munsell Soil Color Charts; iron oxide mottles; hydrogen sulfide odor and other indicators. Generally, wetland hydrology is defined by inundation or saturation to the surface for a consecutive period of 12.5% or greater of the growing season. Areas that contain indicators of wetland hydrology between 5%- 12.5% of the growing season mayor may not be wetlands depending upon other indicators. Field indicators include visual observation of soil inundation, saturation, oxidized rhizospheres, water marks on trees or other fIXed objects, drift lines, etc. Under normal circumstances, indicators of all three parameters will be present in wetland areas. Conner Shy Creek/#A5·3 06 B·12 Wetla nd Consulting, Inc . May 9. 2006 Page] of I I Streams would be identified by the presence of a defined channel that contains flowing surface water at some time of the year . 3.0 OBSERVATIONS 3.1 Existing Site Documentation Prior to visiting the site, a review of several natural resource inventory maps was conducted. Resources reviewed included the King County Soil Survey, King County iMap wetland and stream inventory web-site and the National Wetland Inventory. 3.1.1 King County Soil Survey According to the King County Soil Survey the site contains Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AgC) which typically occurs on slopes of 6-15 percent. Alderwood gravelly sandy loam soils are moderately well- drained soils and are formed under conifers, in glacial deposits. According to the publication " Hydric soils of the United States" Alderwood soils are not considered hydric or wetland soils. 3.1.2 King County iMap website Conner Shy Crcc kJIIA5·306 B·1 2 Wetla nd Cons ulting. Inc . May 9. 2006 Page 4 0rl l According to the King County iMap website , the only sensitive area on the site is a stream crossing the southwest corner of the site. 3.1.3 National Wetland Inventory Ac cording to the National Wetland Inventory there are no wetlands or streams on the site . : . . ... \ -" 3.3 Uplands --~ ~':.·)\'-I ' . • •• I , '.'::,. i . , • ". \ I ': J .'t ~ e j Conn er Sh y Crcckl#A5-3Q6 8-12 Wet landCoru;ulting . Inc . \ May 9, 2006 Page50f l l The majority of the site is grazed pasture that has been used to graze exotic deer. The site has rolling topography that is generally higher on the east than the west, and is dominated by an east-west oriented linear depression containing a small stream that flows from east to west. A large single family home is located on the southern half of the site as well as one small rental home on the southern end of the site. The pasture area contains a mix of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea), bentgrass (Agrostis spp.), scotch broom (Cystisus scoparius), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum) and scattered patches of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolory. Additionally, red alder (Alnus rubra), Douglas fir (Psuedotsuga menziesit)and a few Scouler's willow (Salix scouleriana) are present. Soil pits excavated within the upland revealed an 8" A-horizon comprised of gravelly loam with a soil color of 10YR 2/20ver a B-horizon of gravelly loam with a color of lOYR 3/4. Soil pits excavated within the upland areas were dry within 12 inches of the soil surface , Conner Shy Creek/#A5·306 B·12 Wetland Consulting, ln c. May 9. 2006 Page 6 of II Topographical view of site as viewed looking north. 3.4 Wetlands/Streams Streams As previously described, a single stream flows from east to west through the center of the site, There is no stream in the location depicted on the King County iMap aerial photograph as shown on Page 4 of this report. The stream on-site is an intermittent non-fish bearing stream that has been classified by the City of Renton as a Class 4 stream. The ordinary high water mark of this stream was surveyed and placed upon the site plan. Class 4 streams typically have a 35' buffer measured from the ordinary high water mark. Wetlands A small riparian wetland was delineated bordering the eastern portion of the stream on the site. This wetland will be referred to as Wetland A. Three other small depressional wetlands were delineated, one on the southern portion of the site that will be referred to as Wetland B , and two on the northern portion of the site that will be referred to as Wetland C and Wetland D. (See attachment) Wetland A Cormer Shy Creekl#A5-306 B-12 Wetland Consulting. Inc. May 9. 2006 Page 7 of II The small riparian wetland (3,759sf) delineated bordering the eastern portion of the stream was flagged with pink flags labeled S 1A-S6A and S 1-S6. This wetland is an emergent wetland dominated by a mix of bluegrass (Poa spp.), soft rush (Juncus eJJusus), and bentgrass. Soil pits excavated within this wetland revealed an 8" A-horizon comprised of gravelly loam with a soil color of 10YR 2/2. The underlying 8-horizon is comprised of gravelly loam with a soil color of 10YR 2/1 that was moist during our site visit. According to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) wetland classification method (Cowardin et al. 1979), Wetland A would be classified as palustrine, emergent, persistent, seasonally flooded (PEM1C). This wetland has very little functional value other than to store a minor amount of stream overflow during any flooding that would occur along this channel. The habitat value of the stream has been degraded from ongoing mowing and grazing. The main value of this wetland is its flood storage capacity which may help alleviate some downstream flooding. This wetland best meets the criteria of a Category 3 wetland due to small size, high degree of disturbance from soil compaction and grazing of exotic deer and lack of any unique features. Typically, Category 3 wetlands have a 25' buffer measured from the wetland edge. Wetland B Wetland 8 is a small depressional wetland (1,912sf) located on the southern portion of the site and was flagged with pink flags labeled 81 to 87. This area has seen significant historic disturbance including placement of up to 11" of fill material, grazing and compacting by livestock. Our soil pits reveled gravelly fill material between 6"-11" in most of the delineated area overlying darker soils with high organic content (lOYR 2/1 soil color). Some soil saturation was present at depths of 12"-16". Our site observation of this area on May 1 followed a period of heavy rainfall the previous day. This wetland is an emergent wetland dominated by a mix of scattered soft rush, creeping buttercup, velvet grass, and orchard grass. Conner Shy CreekiNA5 M 306 BM12 Wetland Consulting,Inc, May 9, 2006 Page 8 of 11 Areas determined to be outside the delineated wetland had B-horizon soil colors with high chromas (lOYR 3/3-3/4) at depths of 8"-12", Wetland B best meets the criteria of a Category 3 wetland due to small size, high degree of disturbance from soil compaction and grazing of exotic deer and lack of any unique features. Typically, Category 3 wetlands have a 25' buffer measured from the wetland edge. However, Category 3 wetlands <2,200sf are not regulated according to City of Renton Code as long as their hydrologic functions are replaced. This small, isolated wetland has a very minimal storage capacity which is being replaced within the plats stormwater facility which should replace the minimal lost functions from filling this small wetland. Wetland C Wetland C is also a small depressional wetland (1,405 sf) located on the northern portion of the site near SE 132nd Street and was flagged with pink flags labeled Cl to C6. This wetland is also an emergent wetland and was dominated by a mix of soft rush and slough sedge (Carex obnupta). Soil pits excavated within this wetland revealed an 11" A-horizon comprised of loamy soils with a soil color of 10YR 2/1 and a B-horizon comprised of silty loam soils with a soil color of 10YR 2/1. Soils were wet during our visit. Wetland C best meets the criteria of a Category 3 wetland due to small size, high degree of disturbance from soil compaction and grazing of exotic deer and lack of any unique features. Typically, Category 3 wetlands have a 25' buffer measured from the wetland edge. However, Category 3 wetlands <2,200sf are not regulated according to City of Renton Code as long as their hydrologic functions are replaced. This small, isolated wetland has a very minimal storage capacity which is being replaced within the plats stormwater facility which should replace the minimal lost functions from filling this small wetland. Wetland D Wetland D is a small depressional wetland (739 sf) located just south of Wetland C and was flagged with pink flags labeled Dl to D9. This is also an emergent wetland and was dominated by soft rush and creeping buttercup. Soil pits excavated within this wetland revealed an 12" A-horizon with wet silty loam soils with a soil color of lOYR 2/1 and a B-horizon Conner Shy Creekl#A5·306 B~12 Wetland Consulting, Inc. May 9, 2006 Page 9 of 11 comprised of wet sandy loam soils with a soil color of2.SY 4/2 and 4/3 with few, fine, and faint redoximorphic features. Soils were wet during our visit. According to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) wetland classification method (Cowardin et al. 1979), Wetlands B, C , and D would be classified as palustrine, emergent, persistent, seasonally flooded (PEMIC). Wetland D best meets the criteria of a Category 3 wetland due to small size, high degree of disturbance from soil compaction and grazing of exotic deer and lack of any unique features. Typically, Category 3 wetlands have a 2S' buffer measured from the wetland edge. However, Category 3 wetlands <2,200sf are not regulated according to City of Renton Code as long as their hydrologic functions are replaced. This small, isolated wetland has a very minimal storage capacity which is being replaced within the plats stormwater facility which should replace the minimal lost functions from filling this small wetland. Other Areas A small (approximately sOOsf) depressional area located just north of Wetland D was also identified by the City as a possible small emergent wetland. However, soil pits excavated in this area revealed a 9" A- horizon with silty loam soils with a soil color of 10YR 2/1. The underlying B-horizon was comprised of sandy loam soil with a soil color of 2/ SY 4/3. It was determined that this area did not meet the criteria for a wetland due to its lack of hydric soils. It should also be noted that after periods of heavy rain this area may retain some water for short periods of time but not apparently not long enough to develop hydric soils. 4.0 PROPOSED PROJECT Impacts The proposed project is the construction of a 61 lot subdivision. The proposed road crossings of the site will require impacting both the creek and a portion (1,713sf) of Wetland A. In addition the 3S' buffer of the Class 4 stream is proposed to be reduced to 2S'. Also proposed is the filling of Wetland B, C and D, all Category 3 wetlands less than 2,200 square feet in size. These impacts are allowed with appropriate mitigation as described by Code. Concept Mitigation COMer Shy Creekl#A5-306 B-12 Wetland Consulting, Inc. May 9. ZOO6 Page 10 of II The road crossings will require placement of an appropriate size culvert. To compensate for the impact to 1, 713sf of Category 3 wetland, 1, 733sf of wetland will be created to the west of the eastern road crossing along the sides of the channel. This creation will involve excavating down the area to create wetland hydrologic conditions and maintain the existing storage capacity of the wetland for floodwater, and then following soil amendments if needed, replanting with a mix of native trees and shrubs. In addition, the rest of the wetland will be enhanced (2,046sf) with native plantings and some habitat features such as large logs. To compensate for the reduced stream buffer, the entire buffer of the stream will be enhanced through the installation of native trees and shrubs as well as large woody debris in and along the stream channel. As stated earlier because Wetland B, C, and D are small, disturbed wetlands located in pasture areas, the main value is their flood storage capacity. During both site visits conducted in October of 2005 and May of 2006, no standing water was evident as needed for breeding amphibians and there was no evidence of the presence of endangered or threatened species. There is no evidence these wetland have the appropriate hydrologic conditions required fro amphibian habitat. Wetlands B,C & D meet the exemption criteria as they are isolated and <2,200sfin size as outlined in the Renton Municipal Code. Hydrological functions lost from the filling of Wetland B, C, and D will be compensated for with the plats stormwater facility. The result of the proposed mitigation is no net loss of existing wetland function (floodwater storage capacity) and a large increase in habitat function as the entire buffer and stream channel will be planted with native trees and shrubs and exotic deer will be removed. The removal of the deer will eliminate nutrients from animal waste entering the stream as well as eliminate the browsing of vegetation. The woody vegetation to be planted will restore a native plant community to the riparian area and provide a source of woody debris and invertebrate substrate for the stream channel as well as shade and cool the water in the channel which will benefit off-site, downstream areas of the tributary that do contain fish. The proposed mitigation area would be monitored for 3 years to determine the success of the mitigation. Following approval of this Conner Shy CreekJ#A5·306 B-12 WeUand Consulting, Inc. May 9, 2006 Page 11 of II concept plan, a detailed Final Mitigation Plan will be prepared and submitted to the City for approval. If you have any questions or need any additional information please contact our office at 253.859.0515 or bye-mail ated@b12assoc.com Sincerely, B-12 Wetland Consulting, Inc. Shannon Stragier Wetland Biologist Ed Sewall Senior Wetland Ecologist ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (Washington State Wetlands Identification & Delineation Manual, 1997) B-12 WETLAND CONSULTING, INC. 1103 West Meeker Stteet Kent, Washington 98032 Ntl+ (253) 859-0515 Project Name/#: S; "-t (" U. Date: 10·tO-0 .;-Investigator: ,4I.feJJ Data Point: D PI Jurisdiction: ~f-",,--State: "'-'..-1 Atypical Analysis: Problem Area: VEGETATION Dominant plant species StrhF Indicator Coverage % 1. ,Tv.-'t' !..""s, "R.d ,FifO"; 2. P", .. ~~ ~ h-tC 3. A-~ ~"I h:-!I: ~ ;?4<. 4. r- 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. % of species OBL, FACW andior FAC: /'?O Hydrophytic vegetation criteria ~No Marginal Conunents: fft~-J SOILS Mapped Soil Series: On Hydric Soils List?: Yes ® Drainage Class: Depth(O in) Matrix color Redox concentration color Texture ...B:in. /Ci"-'2-tz /k.in. /..0. 'In. 7-1l $"~ 7 .. _ in. - m. -Organic soil-, Histic epipedon_, Hydrogen sulfide-, gleyed-l redox concentrations-l redox depletions-, pore linings-, iron concretions _, manganese concretions _, organic mailer in surface horizon (sandy soil) _, organic streaking (sandy soils)_, organic pan (sandy soil)_. Hydric soil criteria met:~No Basis: rCv-.. -. __ of ) Comments: HYDROLOGY Recorded data _, inundation , saturation , watennarks -' drift lines -' sediment deposits __ , drainage patterns Itl ~ ",,.....,1 I .. I-c k~ ~J..5 , Wetland hydrology criteria met:@No Basis: k .. $"-' Comments: S~ARY OF CRITERIA Soil Temp. at 19.7" dep~ Growing Season. . Hydrophytic vegetation: . Hydric SOilS:~~~drOlogy~ Data point meets the criteria ofajurisdictional wetland?' e 0 ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (Washington State Wetlands Identification & Delineation Manual, 1997) B-12 WETLAND CONSULTING, INC. 1103 West Meeker Street Kent, Washington 98032 (253) 859-0515 Proiect Name/#: Date: 10-7" -oS-Investigator: 5~., __ SJ,...,iG-! Data Point: 1/1' z.. Jurisdiction: State: ""'-+ Atypical Analysis: Problem Area: Stratum % of species OBL, FACW andiorFAC: ku VEGETATION Indicator #~( Coverage % Hydrophytic vegetation criteria ~",t ... : ~es~"'oW!M"'a"'rg ... i"'na"'I-------- Comments: _______________________________________ _ SOILS Mapped Soil Series: AI.&-. d On Hydric Soils List?: Yes@> Drainage Class: ___________ _ Depth(O in) Matrix c%r Redox concentration color Texture l~n. ____________ ~/~O~~7~=_~~~/rZ~---------------------_.~~,_----------~n. _____ -"J-=~:...J't.L.:.n~3""1c..:4-'-___________ 7j"":;;R)==+--'-'7---.'---=' ____ __ _ m. ___________________________________________________________________________ ___ _ m. ____ ~~------~--~~----~~--~~--~--------------~~~--------~---------Organic soil_, Histic epipedon_, Hydrogen suljide~ g/eyed_, redox concentrations~ redox depletions_, pore linings_, iron concretions ~ manganese concretions _, organic matter in surface horizon (sandy soil) _, organic streaking (sandy soils) ~ organic pan (sandy soil)_. Hydric soil criteria met: Yes ~Basis; !vp U,f; ..... ~ r r Comments: _________________________________________________ _ HYDROLOGY Recorded data _, inundation , saturation __ --', watermarks ------' drlji lines __ , sediment deposits ___ , drainage ~w= . I I Wetland hydrology criteria met: Yes 6> Basis:_---'N=-"' .. '---'-,~I,.....=,..:.._=_· ,,"~ .... '-'-.....--_=_ __________________ __ Commems: ___________________________________________ _ SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Soil Temp. at 19.7" depth: Growing Season?:.fih! Hydrophytic vegetation:.&!'i Hydric soils:..Y$¥etland hXdrology: Y.!1J Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional wetland?: Yes ~ "" "" 0" 0". __ "" ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (Washington State Wetlands Identification &; Delineation Manual, 1997) B-12 WETLAND CONSULTING, INC. 1103 West Meeker Street Kent, Washington 98032 (253) 959·0515 .~t t?01'1 n,l> Point: DPB) 'l'roiectName/#.~11/1' &~I i0 Date: C;J, J 1!1/J Tnv I Jurisdicrion: LA lJ-.r ~* . tf'fl ,rl IAJ.Er-Atvnica!' .1. '. -Problem Area:---- I VEGETATION D0ntnt plant species Stratum Indicator Coverage % 1. /) fI ~f/fj U,,2, /~i1.s. 2. ~QI . 3. 4. 5. 6. • 7. 8. 9. 10. % of species OBL, FACW andiorFAC: ;Hydrophytic vegetation criteria llll:l: Y~i liQ MAI~iDal Comments: SOILS Mapped Soil Series: On Hydric Soils Lisi?: Yes lli . Drainage Class: Depth(O i'2J . Matrix co!!!;::;,.. Redox concentration color Texture , J JJ.u., . ~// /O~J rvu'x"" -Cly1--.d/.i.f1 . _m. m. , fJ1d /-,'/111-.5'5>. Q -in. lL-!fA .). '5" II ,//2, Mr2i#/II'" "iti t1rfl/J /00 VI_ -in. , / Organic soll_. Histie epipedon...., Hydrogen su/jide-l gleyed..J redox concenlraliollJ..J redox deplellollJ..J pore linings-, iron concretions--, manganese eoncretlollJ...., organic matter In surface horizon (sandy soll)-, organic streaking (sandy solls)-> organic pan (sandy soll)_. Hydric soil criteria met: yes No Basis: Comments: HYDROLOGY Recorded data--, inundation , saturation .watermarks-.-J . drift Iincs _____ sediment depositJ---> drainage patterns Wetland hydrology criteria met: Ths No Basis: Comments: SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Soil Temp. at 19.7" depth: Growing Season?:,Yill Hydrophytic vegetation:.1ill Hydric soils:.Y[:tiWetland hydrology: Yili Data point meets the criteria ofajurisdictional wetland?: Ye~ liQ ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (Washington State Wetlands Identification &: Delineation Manual, 1997) B·12 WETLAND CONSULTINq INC. 1103 West Meeker Street Kent" Washillgton 98032 (2SJ) 859·0515 /' I .. +-~ C;:I}. .. ;1 J. -I I.. Y CA... . f'J. no.-." ProiectName/#' tiVLV\ AIIJ/, Date: 'ill/Oh Investi •• tor: 5lt1~MN1§nData.Point: roei-· Jurisdiction: (1.<. r4lJ)11~ S!a1e~ h JI:i-. Atvn;o.1 Analv,j" Problem Area:-, () Dominant plant species Stratum VEGETATION Indicator Coverage % 1. _____________________________ _ 2. ___________ ~ _______________________ _ 3. _______________________________ ~ ___ _ 4. . 5. ____ ----_________ --., _________ _ 6., _____________ -'-___________________________ _ 7. ______ ~~---------------------------8. _____________________________________ _ 9. __________ -..:.. ________ ------------- 10· _________________ -" ______________ 1 % of species OBL, FACW and/or FAC: ____ H.ydrophytic vegetation criteria met:""Y..I:esL,CN:lLo.J.M",.",rg..,m",au..1 ______ _ comrnents: _____________ ..,..-____________________ _ SOILS Mapped Soil Series:. __ :-:-_-:-__ ,On Hydric Soils Lisi?: Yes No' Drainage Class: __ ..,..... _______ _ De~h (0 i~_ 0 Ma1!J~;i< ?./:;:. Redox conceJllration color Texturi;, fA W}) I/} <:;r) j(! J LJ{)O "'" _ill. {r 12 .J/i,d<'-?I/ dJOitJYI./C. c;,/!JIMIlk.,C'I.U1~ _m. _____________ ' __ ' _______________ / ____ v_~~~O~~~na~~_1 m .. ..,.....~--~~~~-~--~-~~~~------:_:_~~--~~--~-Organic soil_, Histic eptpedon..." Hydrogen sulfide.....! gleyed.....! redox eoneeJItrations.....! redox depletions..." pore iinings-, iron cOllcretiolls-, manganese concretions..." organic matter in surface horizon (sandy soi1)-, organic streaking (sandy soils)-, organic pan (sandy soil)_. Hydric soil criteria met: ves No Basis: _________________________ _ I comrnents:,_· __________________________________ 1 HYDROLOGY Recorded data -' inundation , saturation __ -" watermarks---J'drijllines----> sediment deposits --' drainage patterns,-:-7'"C;-' Wetland hydrology criteria met: ves No Basis:. _______________________ _ Comrnents: ___________________________________ 1 SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Soil Temp. at 19.7" depth: Growing Season?:.YLtJ: Hydrophytic vegetation:..Yili Hydric soils:J:a::[Wctland hydrology: YLl::!. Data pomt meets the criteria ofajurisdictional wetland?: Yes No · ... '" •••• o· _.~_ ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (Washington State Wetlands Identification &: Delineation Manual, 1997) B-12 WETLAND CONSULTING, INC. 1103 West Meeker Street Kent, WasbiJJgton 98032 "', OPt?)! (253) 859-0515 IpmiectNamel#: ~ C/U/~k.~ Date: 57//cJh Tnv r~fv:rOV1 D~t'ol>oilt· :DP6~ ,_/ ' . -../ a . n, JurisdicJion: (3r!-I/J M. ' !? .ojl rt&/) St.t., I1JIf-A." . ,",Tv';,' --. v VEGETATION Dominant plant species Stratum Indicator Coverage % 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. o ) 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. % of species OBL, FACW andlorFAC: ~ydrophytic vegetation criteria met. Y~I l:l:Q MiI~iDi!l Comments: SOILS Mapped Soil Serie,: On Hydric Soils Lisi?: Ths NQ 0 prainage Class: Depth(O in) Matrix color :3. Red0(pnceI1tration color Texture -m. /(2 \LI2 ?/3 i itl Pi! , in. -in. -in. Organic sOil_. Hislic epipedon...." Hydrogen sulfide..,., gleyed-J redox concwrations-J redox depletions...." pore linings_. iron concretions-J manganese concretlons-J organic matter in surjacehorizon (sandy soll) __ organic streaking (sandy soils) __ organic pan (sandy sOiO_. HydriC soil criteria met: Xes No Basis: Comments: HYDROLOGY Recorded dala __ inundation , salUration • watermarkr-.J'drlft lines--J sediment deposils--.J drainage patterns Wetland hydsology criteria met: y., Nq Basis: Comments: SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Soil Temp. at 19.7" depth: Growing Season?:,Yili Hydrophytic vegetation:,Yili Hydric soils:,Yili Wetland hydroloID': Yili Data point meets the criteria ofajllrisdictiona! wetland?: Y~I N2 · _. ,._ ... ... " .. -' -" ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (WashlngtOIl State Wetlands Identljlcat/on & DeIlneation Manual, 1997) B·12 WETLAND CONSULTINGlINC. 1103 West Meeker Street Kent" Washiagton 98032 'l>r"ieetN~me/#.~&li&10 (23J) 859-0515 '-.~ j;. Date: c:;// /0& Dat.Point r:tP/l6"' ' Tnv ./, '~anJ100 i Juri.dicticn: (',,'-J-.v( 01. fl.oP n+v (l State: ~M Atvnicol ,.h '. -" Are,' -- ! () VEGETATION Dominant plant species Stratum Inc!iQ\or Coverage % 1. 2. 3 . .. 4. S. , j 6, 7. 8. 9. 10. % of species OBL, FACWand/orFAC: Hydrophytic vc~etatiOll criteria mce ~§ li2 M.lrgiD~l Comments: SOILS Mapped Soil Series: On Hydric Som Uli7: ~§ No ' Drainai\:c, Class: Depth(O in) 10 ~Jtalrb;?lJ3. +-3/4 Red~Conc~plionc%r Texture _in. in. ' ~ -_in. in. Organic soU--, Hislie epipedon-, Hydroi\:ensu/jlde...,J g/eyed...J redox concenlratiolU-I redox dep/eliolU-, pore linings-, iron concrelions--, manganese eoncrelloNS-, organic matter In sur/ace horizon (sillldysollJ-I organic streaking (sandy soils} ...... organic pan (sandy soIO_. , , Hydric soil criteria met: yes No Basis: Comments: , ' HYDROLOGY Recorded data--, inundation , saturallon ,walermark: _____ 'drift /ines _____ sediment deposits--, drainage patlerns Wetland hydrology criteria met Yes No Basis: Comments: SUMMARY OF CIUTERlA Soil Temp. at 19.7" depth: Growing Season7:.Yru Hydrophytic vegetation:.YLJ::! Hydric .oill:.YiliWetland hydrolou, Ym. Data point meets the criteria ofajurudictional wetland?: y~~ l:!2 ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (Washington State Wetlands Identification & Delineation Manual, 1997) B-12 WETLAND CONSULTING1 INC. 1103 WcstMcd:erSttcct Jurisdiction: D'/.+, fJ'[ V.ovtt(£'l'J IU Kent, WasbbJ.gton 98032 (2SJ) 859-0515 nate: t:; /'l./07,c; Tnv Stat~ (,( Nt VEGETATION Dol1);ipant plant specie, . Stratum Indicator t :iWi~f$&i1ff[6iu&eah!r 'Off£uJii) IfPL 4. ____________________ ------ 5 .. ___ ~------________ ...,j-----------6. _______ -'--_________________ _ 7. _____ -:-'-_____________________ _ 8· __________ -'-___________________ 1l 9. ________ -..:... ____ -...,_-----------10. ___________________ .:.-____________ _ % of species OBL, FACW andlor FAC:. ____ Hydroph~c vegetation criteri.1 mct:..JY ... es~N~o.:l.~~~·'!!·a~------Conunents: _____________ ..,-___________________ _ ~,.1 SOllS . ffil'JM/J.))od On Hydric Soils Lisi?: Yes &! Drainage Cws: ___ ------- Matr~ col0S--Redox con:entration color :rex?~ j=: 6ZI? ~~l IOU, *,1IIJJJjJ;."ffh~'; m .. ~--. __ ~~~~~~ __ ~ __ ~ __ ~ ___________ ~~~~ ____ ~~_~ __ Organic soll_, Histic epipedon--, Hydrogen sU/fide-J gleyed-J redox concentratiollS--, redox depletiollS-J pore linings-, iron concretions --J manganese concretlollS--, organic matter In surface horizon (s<J?ldy soll)--, organic streaking (sandy soils)-, organic pan (sandy soil)_. I ' I /' . ;;> . Hydric soil criteria met: Yes No Basis: (vlMq"/ (! t:U....-~ M2-i-?M.~CA. -,0 II . Comments: ___________________________________ \ HYDROLOGY Recorded data -J inundation , saturatio/l, __ ..J' watermarks --,'drift lines ----' sediment deposits --' drainage p~-( Wetland hydrology criteria me~ Yes No Basis: MO ,'5+ SO/ Is I MCv.f;p·/i g Comments: I SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Soil Temp. at 19.7" depth: Growing Season?:..Yili Hydrophytic vegetation:..YLt:! Hydric soils:"YiliWetland hydrology: Yili Data pomt meets the criteria ofajurisdietional wetland?: Yes No ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (Washington State Wetlands Identlflcatlon & Delineation Manual, 1997) B-12 WETLAND CONSULTING! lNC. 1103 West Meeker Street Kent" WaShlfJglon 98032 (2SJ) 859·0515 ,Proiect Name/#: ~ (!,r,J.~ Date: 5b/Ow . ~f/IJI O!1. D't,l'oint:cVC / 'Jurisdiction: 0 +,/0 m fIt/tfon IU State: INA Stratum VEGETATION Indi~OU 2. / CiilYu c: Itl c;, tJ c ...L (,'44 I x Ah l1LUJdzJ.. 3. O?VJU5h'''o dr/5{). 4. 'Orv;' crf)/)'. -. Area: --- Coverage % 30 ~) 5·_.-!...~--___ --'-_______ "'T1 _________ _ 6· _______ ----" ____________________ 1 7., _____ :-'-___________________ _ 8, _________ ~ ________________ _ 9· ______________ ~ __________ ~-------------------------1 10. __________________ -'-____________ _ % of spe,ies OBL, FACW and/or FAC: ___ -.!Hydrophytic vegetation criteria metI..Wl$..IN::!low::,MLIlarUig.win""aJ ______ _ Conunents: _________________________________ _ Mapped Soil Series: fkd 1.1 /! )00.01 On Hydric Soils L~g~ ~ DraillageClass: _________ _ Deplh(O in) , Mat~ color , J Redox conceJltration color -Texture, ,_ 0".,,'/ in, () -/1 /v VIP :;;./; , /OtifrlJI cUi =ll1. li-1I, ./L)' If/? '2.11 C; J / It-; tJ a n--, _in. f _in.,~~~~~~~~~----~--~~--~------~--~~~~--~~~~~-Organic soil_. Histic epipedon...J Hydrogen sulflde....J gleyed....J redox concenlrallons....J redox depletions...J pore linings_. iron concretions....J manlranese concretions...J organic mailer in surface horizon (slm,dysoil)...J organic streaking (sandy soils)-, organic pan (sandy soil) , Hydric soil criteria meW No Basis: __ {)dy;:..::::::~.L.!::.{).:.M:..:.:.:~:.::::'__ _________________ _ Conunents:_' ______________________ ------------l HYDROLOGY Recorded data....J inundation __ -" saturation X ,watermarkr---,'dr/ftJlnu---J sedimentdeposits----, drainage patterns . Wetland hydrology criteria met y~ Basis: ~M Is f tZ:Yi ~ Comments: 1/)(1(.41 t----' r/ " $+.i,rl7C 'f1t) (4J.v:p::::;, a_ =2't(J?;- SUl4/ARY OF CRITERIA Soil Temp, at 19.7" depth: Growing Season~ Hydrophytic vegetation:..Yili Hydric soi1&~W~tland hy(!rology: Yili Data point meets the cnteri. ofajurisdictional wetland?: !iii No , ... -'"' -_._--... _- ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (Washington State Wetlands Identification &: Delineatten Manual, 1997) B·12 WETLAND CONSULTIN~ INC. 1103 West Meeker Street Kent,. Washington 98032 (2$3) 8SMS1S i Proiect Name/II: t]1),u;-, ~ Date: t:; /Sl /()7; rnvesti~.tcr: ~JL.nJ'1 tJ /7 nata.Point: CPC'2 JlIrisdiction: ( JIU/! hi.. I//).J/I 'I~n ~t"t., fA)l') -Area: - IV VEGETATION f'l"""r'':'''' Stratum lndicato~= Coverage 0/0 {!J.1 U. (2 rf'W t21::.fA t1 I.e--'!J-U ;:.~ , r2 -4. 5. • 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. % of species OBL, FACWandJorFAC: ~ydrophytic vegetation criteria met y~~ l:IQ ~ Comments: . SOILS' . Mapped Soil Series:1YtJp,!A.)Ooo! On Hydric Soils Lisi?: Yes r.g) Drainage. Class: Depth(O in) . 1. Matrix color Redox concentration color Texture d It. in. -/~ /() yr ;:;~. ~'Vi (J.a 1/1-7 =in. L....:,! 7V V L ;-== ;6L yif ~ ~ 'tf'y(l4t = :c..' in. -in. Organic soil_, His/ie eplpedon-J Hydrogen sulfide __ g/eyed-J redox concentrations--, redox depletlons-J pore linings-, iron eoncre/ions-, manganese concretions-J organic matter in surface horizon (sandy soil) ..... organic streaking (sandy soils)-, organic pan (sandy soil)_. !k1l",M'/i aJ -Cf'VI ~'M 't7n . Hydric soil criteria met: Ye~ Basis: :; Comments: • , saturatlen ct HYJ)ROLOGY Recorded data-, inundation .watermarks--....--J 'drifllines ______ sediment deposits--J drainage patterns . ~'hv1ah'rh Wetland hydrology c't,ia m~~asis: M (Ij t! t Y<2!" '0 Comrnents:"7flJII IltA rJ h 4J P;F q ;4/1 { ,,~ ; SUMMARY OF CRITERiA Soil Temp. at 19.7" depth: Growing se~ Hydrophyticvegetation:~ .Hydrl, soils: etland hYdrOIO~ ~l~ Data point meets the critena ofajllIisdictional wetland?: y~~ N2 ROUTINE WETLAND DETERlVllNATION DATA FORM (Washington State Wetlands Identlflcatlon &; Delineation Manual, 1997) B·12 WETLAND CONSULTINGl INC. 1103 West Meeker Street Kent,. Washitlgton 98032 (255) 859-0515 I Proiect Name/#: 1rt)/i (;;'11 J/_ ~~.~]t7b)' ;;']~i;,0t:7=' /1T~n'v=' ~~ 8h:.ltUi='JYI~m~'~ Tl"~'t"~~"Di~nlt:~DfC-=':2~ ~~t\ Jurisdiction' f'AJhLy/ th /Lg.,,~ IA J ;g-A' .. I Area: - f V VEGETATION Stratum ~~!v 2, f<AlMfA,";Ojv 0/\ 3, ' 4,--------------------...--------1 5. ____ -------______ ...,. . .,... _________ _ 6. _______ ....:....-___ -_____________ _ 7, _____ -;--'-______________________ 1 8, __________ -'-_________________ _ 9, _________ --.:. _____ -..,.. ____________ _ lO. _________________ ~ ___________ _ % of species OBL, FACW anillor FAC:, ___ -'Hydrophytic vegetation criteria met:...JY'-SieILS J.:NilI9..!1~:.!!!:'j;J'~I-_____ _ Conunen~: ______________________________________________ 1 Mapped Soil Series: Deplh(O in). . /; m, 6-/ =in. /f)/! . ~ SOILS . 41..dJh 11.)t)(!;J On Hydric Soils Lis!?: Yes @ Duinagc Class: ___ -------1 M4trixfj,or?l" Redox concentration calor TexM.$,,;.1 J 'I) 'ik, :>/_ :)11/1J)/.k-; ItJk/Y7 //) {fR 3} #!, ('-,/, u?/f I/o /Od.AI'VJ f V __ m,------------~----______________________________________________ __ in·_~~~~~~-~~---~~-~~-~----------~~~~--~~--~---I Organic soil_, Histie epipedon.....J Hydrogen suljlds.....J gleyed.....J redox concenlraliollS.....J redox depleliollS.....J pore linings-, iron concrelions.....J manganese concrellollS.....J organic matter In sur/ace horizon (sandysoll)...,j organic streaking (sandy soils)....." organic pan (sandy soiV _. () L A Hydric soil criteria met:~ Basis: __ :....:,;+yl:.;....:;:....;;·U)11:::....,:~.!;t::-==__ ______________________ 1 Comments: __________________________________________ _ HYDROLOGY Recorded dala.......,J inundation , saturatlon __ -" watermarks--........J'drifi lines--! sediment deposits---, drainage patterns I ' _" t 'J~. "f-/,/ \ // Wetland hydrology criteria met ~NR ~asis:-7A1:.!:.f!f.t?~=~iZ:tJ.:ifw. . .!..r1:.-::0~· +./~+~-:,f/L.J'C..-{~~_':;' ~SD;:;::.7:::_i":o':_'-"-'---"---'L..i=----- Comments: 10 2!g..:",dl (1A w~ at: Y2tirrYn 4& Rz'T '" ~ , SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Soil Temp. at 19,7" depth: Growing Season?:.YLtl Hydrophytic vegetation:j(ft) Hydric sOils:.YLlDVetland hydrology: Yili Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional wetland?: Yes No ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (Washington State Wetlands Idcntijlcation & Delineation Manual, 1997) B·12 WETLAND CONSULTINGl INC. 1103 WcstMcckuStrcet Kent" Washington 98032 (2SJ) 959-0515 1:;i'dl:~;:"P,5Ji;i.t~09i5 :: "/;Ji pv ~ !2t':l;~:;;'£f'O! VEGETATION DominA'ntPlant~ Stratum,~ Iodicator ~ .. Coverage % 30 ~% o l ~ IY1I!fi~YQ 4~~ S, ___ ---.:... ___________ ~.,..,..----------6,, _______ ---' ___________________ _ 7,-----7'----------------------8, __________ -'-_________________ _ 9, _________ :..-____ __,_------------10. _________________ -=-___________ _ % of spec;ies OBL, FACW and/or FAC:' ___ ...JHydrophytic vegetation criteria mct@~~ ... NlI<o"-Ml:::WarJ;.gmw· a .. 1 ______ _ Conunents: ___________________________________ 1 ,II J . d SOILS Mapped Soil Series: tnd (JIlIA J?<t On Hydric Soils List?: Yes~ Drainage Class: ___________ ll Dep~~(O inb ..c-I Z Matrix J~oi t1 ;:. II R.dox concentration color Textur~ '!th A! lJa Pt,;-, -in. r;"'I!" 9.~V 41'2_7-'-"//6 +.'I-,-f-4y',I/J:d~('I/j //.1/i -~' ( Or;;'nl-:-'C-SO:-i7'/-,-R::jJ:-' l:-iC-.p-ip:-ed,...,...on-..,.J--:H:-yd-:-r-og-e-n-su.,,/jI-d.,..e~--g.,.ley-.-d-'-'-re-d-ox-c-o-nc-en-t-ra-ti-ollS-..,.J--red""'o-x-d:""ep"':/:-el":"io-IlS-..,.J-p-or-e-:-/i:-ni:-ng-s-, 7iro-n-1 concrelions-J mangane.re concretiollS..,.J organic matter in surface horizon (sandy soil)....J organic streaking (sandy soils)..,.J ~k~~~ A/_~. Hydric soil criteria me~N9 Basis: f1-tMt?;o' VI QA_-. LAIC I t/YY7C-2 /.,0 I ~t.{-, , • Comments: . 7 /I~fE!3!:l!C HYDROLOGY Recorded data-J inundation , saturation Y I watermarks~'driflline.r----, s.diment deposils-, drainage patterns . ~ 11.1.1' Wetland hydsolos~ria mr~9 Bas~is~:_~(;VVt~.~. +.i7=.,..~;,;,c::':::!"....b_,...--",.,...-r.,....,r----------- Comments: 7@.fiC!..._ II &TiA.. Itt ~'7"1ti'511 ?§ Pi f SUMMARY OF CRITERIA. Soil Temp. at 19.7" depth: Growing Se~:.Yili Hydrophytic vegetati~ Hydric soils Wetland hydrology~ Data point meets the enteria ofajurisdictional wetland?: Yes No Shy Creek Development City of Renton Preliminary Technical Information Report Prepared for Conner Homes Triad Job No. 03-185 Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report Shy Creek PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION Prepared By· REP 0 RT <>V!~~\~G ~ <-",o~ o"\~€ I'\\OW \'.~\O\):tI 0< King County, Washington \) cl 'l11'\)'\)'Q City of Renton ~~'il-N~'O ~~C~'\ Prepared for: Conner Homes 846 108th Avenue NE Bellevue, Washington 98004 Michael A. Moody, P.E. March 22, 2006 Job #03-185 h~RJ8P ---- Page 1-;; Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................... I 2 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY .................................................................... 3 3 OFFSITE ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................................... 4 4 FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN .................................. 5 4.1 DRAINAGE CONCEPT ...................................................... . ............................................ 5 4.2 KCRTS METHODOLOGy ............................................................................................................. 5 4.3 W ATFR QUAI.ITY VOLUMES.................................................... . ............. . ............. 12 5 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ................................................................. 13 6 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STlJDlES ............................................................................................. [4 7 OTHER PERMITS ............................................................................................................................ 15 8 TESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN .................................................................................................... 16 9 BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT.. 19 [0 OPERATIONS AND MA[NTENANCE MANUAL ....................................................................... 20 March 22. 2006 Job #03-185 Page 1-iii Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report LIST OF SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION SECTION I TIR WORKSHEET NORTH ONSITE EXISTING CONDITIONS EXHIBIT SOUTH ONSITE EXISTING CONTlDIONS EXHIBIT DEVELOPED CONDITIONS AND CONCEPTUAL OUTFALL EXHIBIT KING COUNTY SCS MAP KING COUNTY SCS LEGEND SECTION 3 ATTACHED LEVEL I DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS REPORT SECTION 4 NORTH ONSITE EXISTING CONDITIONS EXHIBIT SOUTH ON SITE EXISTING CONDITIONS EXlilBIT DEVELOPED CONDITIONS AND CONCEPTUAL OUTFALL EXHIBIT KCRTS PRINTED DOCUMENTATION FIGURE 3.2.2A KCSWM RAINFALL REGIONS TABLE 3 .2.2B 2005 KCSWM SCS SOIL TYPES FIGURE 6.4.I.A PRECIPITATION FOR MEAN ANNUAL STORM KING COUNTY SCS MAP KING COUNTY SCS LEGEND SECTION 8 FIGURE 5.3.4.H RISER INFLOW CURVES March 22. 2006 Job #03·185 IT~ -- Page 1·iv " :c o ffi en (') m -i 0 o -I iii 0 :c Z < ~ Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW The project proposes to create 61 single-family lots including open space, recreation and detention tracts on a 16,14 acre property. The site is bounded north-south by NE 2nd Street (a.k.a. SE 132nd Street) and SE 2nd Street (a.k.a. SE 136th Street), and east-west by 142nd Avenue SE and 144th Avenue SE (a.k.a. Jericho Avenue). [n general, the site lies within Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M" King County, Washington, The location of this site is within the recently annexed portion of the City of Renton. The Vicinity Map below shows the general location of the site. This Preliminary Technical Information Report describes the existing and proposed drainage for the project site per Section 2.3,1.1 of the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), including preliminary detention sizing calculations, March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 ro /-4-05 -. Vicinity Map Page 1 ---------------------------- Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report Nol to Scale Currently the site consists of several existing structures (which will be removed), landscaping, and several small wetland areas that will be maintained or mitigated oiTsite. The entire site is located within a single drainage basin and drains to the south and west. Stormwatcr management for the proposed development will require the construction of a single wetpond. March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 Page 2 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER Project Owner: Conner Development L. P. Address 846-108th Ave NE Suite 202 Bellevue WA 98004 Phone (425) 823-1955 Project Engineer: Micheal A. Moodv, PE Company: Triad Associates Address/Phone: (4251821-8448 Part 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION X Subdivison [i Short Subdivision L Grading U Commercial [I Other Part 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND Project Name: Shy Creek Location: Township: 23 N Range: 5 E Section: 15 DESCRIPTION Part 4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS 0 DFWHPA U Shoreline Management 0 COE 404 [I Rockery n DOE Dam Safety U Structural Vaults 0 FEMA Floodplain 0 Other 0 COE Wetlands Part 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community Nel1.-'Castie Drainage Basin: Lower Cedar River River Sub-basin of Cedar River Sub-basin Part 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS lJ River X Stream " 1 __ J Critical Stream Reach 0 Depressions/Swales II Lake [ Steep Slopes Part 7 SOILS Soil Type AgC Slopes 2-15% 0 Floodplain 0 Wetlands lJ Seeps/Springs L High Groundwater Table [ Groundwater Recharge U Other Erosion Potential Erosive Velcoties I II Additional Sheets Attached Part 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS REFERENCE o Ch. 4 -Downstream Analysis II D n [ LJ II Additional Sheets Attached Part 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION X Sedimentation Facilities X Stabilized Construction Entrance X Perimeter Runoff Control X Clearing and Graing Restrictions X Cover Practices X Construction Sequence X Other I LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT I MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION X Stabilize Exposed Surface X Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities X Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris X Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities X Flag Limits of SAO and open space preservation areas U Other Part 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM [j Grass Lined [I Tank 0 Infiltration Method of Analysis Channel li n KCRTS Level 2 Vault Depression X Pipe System LJ Ll Compensation/Mitigation Energy Flow Dispersal of Eliminated Site LJ Open Channel Dissapator 0 Storage Waiver D Dry Pond J Wetland n '-' Regional X Wet Pond [J Stream Detention Brief Description of System Operation: Level 2 KCRTS detention pond with basic water quality wetpond. Facility Related Site Limitations Reference Facility Limitation Part 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Part 12 EASEMENTSITRACTS 0 Cast in Place Vault X Drainage Easement D Retaining Wall Il Access Easement J Rockery > 4' High LJ Native Growth Protection Easement 0 Structural on Steep Slope X Tract L. Other n Other Part 13 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER lor a civil engineer under my supervision my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. /0/ ~nedlOate !-I(-O~ 7 !\ i ~ ~ El~ NO.1f)NJHStfM 'N01N311 dO AlI:) Iii! >1331/:) J,.HS ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ! )'NttdWO:) S3WOH H3NNO:) ! ~ n 3.lIS H.lHON 13 '\H .l181HX3 SNOI.lIGNO:) tJNI.lSIX3 3.lISNO '~JJO a '" 0 IX) II = ..-a '" W ....J <t:: a 0 " , II CJ) I a II 1 ., - ;;111 I~ El~ I~ L NOISIA:ilI UYO "ON :AS aadlA3~ z c' " ::; < , x 0 0; z , ; , ~ c ! ~ • i ~ ~ ~ t;j" • a-. 2 ~t~~~ ~~~ l"t;:h H ~ "J i7;oC~..j.::s ~:iIl r" <. ItT';;; U~ ~ ~dl ~ I:) ~ , (') <:) • ~ en o o N Q "--=,=~--j±-~=~= I I I 3 1- I " • ~ , 'I! -: !: I~ , J I J~ ,~ :;-, Ilnl II • 1 ,I II I II! III 1 I! ,Q I , if , I , I L ~1';faooiiiT- ,c" • ~ ;; --~--- , z .. --~,~" "b.,- N I }Ii 'dOCId 'Ci81 ; " "~ 'I.{!JON '6MP "Su0.'i.'puoJ 8uns.'x3 8i.'5UQ \ Sl.'qll-V 3\ S8jl)6MO\ r;g trO' 3rCCfd \, ":.,' 1""''-':11 "'lOZ 'C"" "\j , .'~," :..., ,--,'c,· U:J, .. !f)(),'] -,.',) 10.111 I "',PROJ£C i '; 18,':; \. OWy' (,.!es \ [xhlbits \ Onsite [xistin 9 Conditions. dwg. Sou th, 5, PROP. til ~~~ co '" o o U' ~ 3' > o » '"' VI o n p ~ C'O ,~ I~ \!~ ~,~ ~!i~ ~ °1- . , C t.,) , ~ !o, 1 '0" n "I' c~ ,,~.;:( '; ~.(~: C'I' ~~~ ~ ,~~. ' ",I.., .I l ~ il ill i I ! 'I / ,II § '/1,',1 ./ /1 "',. " '->1 1 'i""IG-J I ,---././ ; i zg' -~-' " , I ,-;M ~~ ~+_._. _I "'\4. I~ i H:f:-~ " ,Ii,/ I~t C', I' c • , " ,-~ ,. 'y: , ,,, " I ,I 0 .... '" ,,',0<, ,~,,,'_. , ;;;;::;;::;~:ri ~ 12" (:'" 388 C)61:: l::-.S"~rJ'" ~'@C:}" ~~ " ~ ·,tJ--" ~, ~ 9 ~-----~ .. ". "'T,--, l '" .. --~ l' '1 ~,~, \g'-"'''' ~ ",-, 'I",,, ~ ~~ tj~~~ t .. ~ j2 § --"'\~*'~ :: . ~'"'?"":; , ~~ 0, ~ ':$ g i~; l;~ ,. ',.? ; :;;;}o: ,'(1 ~ ,~ co ~ R~rU'ED BY: ~~~~~J~!~J "~ 0 :;'1; NO. om RHISWN gg~_I"" ... Io<o>!.:1"" S-=~ ;§ ~ ~l c. ~"~>a •• ~ ........ I ... -< ... • ' "" Si!@ ~I'''' ~I~ "'1 8: ~ I IJI 1 I .~~: 'I I 11: ~~: I I . 0, ~ > '-'-", gs<;, v ~ DO ~. '" ' ",I /' r~7'~J G ~ ~ ~I' CO gla ! "! "1= ~-r- 2f.= .. Iv : ·0 ' I c~, ! , 'C~ _ -J __ , ---"c',' ,. _' ~,, __ I-.... ~.) i l...L .. -lL-,,2.8ll;i ~ . 1--1'=./ /:/7 , ,so-so, ' _ ~.~/ ~ .... , .. .j ~ g j L . .,;, 2! . ~ Q ' ..... ~.>'. "''-.,·:;, ... r,,·· ,,:,.'. ' . cf .. "::'~'\~ :3 ,,','0 !. . ; ",~. c ~ \'~ ~ ~J 's('" , 7 i Q ~ ~~I' "~\\\~0~A , ' Y · \ ~ , n L / .. " I~~~lr; 8 ebJ==-R; ,.~~< \"'0 r2~"" '","-\gl) 't, '"' c~"'~~I' t: OO"'!Il-'" (i\ § '~'\~ '" • . 0 .~ ....' ~,.'k-":~:~l<~ ...... ~ o o ~ DATE: o o " :.~t\::~·~ i'; ~~81f, ~ i '\ -.4. ~~' Z;'ii;u r~r-·'y· .y;. .., ,.....,., .. ,..--"'.. ~~or'''"' .. 9':'.0 '"'-/ ,.5~ / ~~f.~;~:;;~ / 0 (j) ... C") a » r m '" a .... : II 00 q ~ '" 0 ""'\ ".y". 1 ';'~~;\'Q . '\:\ 70 V ~r-= r~ ~~ '=''? g~' ~2. 'S > \ \ .. ~\ '}~);;:::: , .' \ ~.\ \~\ \~\ \ '. \ '\. \ ~ M . , '\ \) S)) (/ ~~i~ II 1\ 2: \ ."' ..... 'c ,~,,\c •. c·.,·· .. ,)-0 ,."," cc' ., ';' . ~~ ------.... ' ~ ~ ~ ~ i='1 ~ (i) ~ ~ ~ S2 :::I ~ ~ ~ 9;! """t ONSITE EXISTING CONDITIONS EXHIBIT DY eK SOUTH SITE t ! I n CONNER HOMES COMPANY s: i ~,~ r c, SHY CREEK ! : q i § CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON < , "i ,~, , :') , , ,,, fl' , n l:; ~, ;J ,; ':--, ;:~- " , , Co c, ,-:f., ~ ,'< Co ,~~; 'f' , <, ;J CJ <" r_j ';< I l' c;" " , .•... (fJ ~ 0 o :x> r m ~ • II ~ '" q ,.,» "'~ ~~ ..... .. ~ ~~ .. ~ "'~ "'" !!! rRl-I(J(:.llrd Ditch , --~-=F-~ I ,,-.-~ -=~_~~,,-~-~-~~--,s~-~-_=~:-~o~,:::,~-,~--~--~'~""-~~~~~::-:C~'-~':'<b;;;;"~\;~-;;;:;;:-:-:":'-~" 'I '1'1 --'11--II' I -'I' -~~-- -::-, ,C~-:5!,'--->------TRAC; '" ' "':~ I J 'I 1'\ 54 I " 55 , " ,. , ' 57 "I 58 'I ' 59 "I' I~ "I' ® --' " '" 'l>'" $paC< " "'" i 53 ~,',' IPAD"'I' I' 1'''''''-1 'I' 1'''''''-1 'I' ~ I 1"''''-1' , ~ I I ~ I , 1''''''''1, !!!ll""''''~ . --~'---1 -~.----~-Ili:!iU ') , ,( J925 i I -'94 .. 5_ I I J97.0 i ~.~ __ • I -.1)1.0 I, ~5 J I I t I I L _4a7.0, l' ----': ,~",~", ,'-' , "',' ,~ \n-I ,--t---' ---+._------- TRACT:: :!y" ii" 52 '!: 51 I!: 50' 'I '\' . ~;,lj"" +-I 'II <8~II" .,: I ..; I, I 45 -illl'~ .. ',1, <.J I, I! 42: ,':,' I :: DeftNIU"" ':-~ l~oa..l, I; 1~.5£LI'1 I IZflLII, TRACr\,. \ tr-I~al ,I, I I~oal ,I ; l~oELI ! I ! I I I 1=;gsELI I I 1~:fORII I " I " 1=:f.SlLl; I Iii' 'I I IR~tl()fl • IT" " r I : ~ , i I .... , ' ! r-,I ~--I---'::-~::"==::"- ~ =f "'-r:~:;-,.:.~ -.--.r '~. (0 l: IIIJ;-±_~, ;~ V ,', "n~o M '0\, M "I' <t r J-c PAr; £L I I ~ II 'I IpAD ELlli ' I " , I I:, ,I:. :':' I fP;O.D£Q ,-P 1::,l9 :1 1 1~:f/9 I: I [PAD1'l.l I ' I,,,, I 'I" ~ "' .. "., .. 15 'I.' .'6 I' 17 'l! '8. 'Ii'>, '., , "i'I,.!O~1 ~~ , ... I, "I' ~ I» 10 I i IT I' 12 I ) I ~ I ' IPAD£Q : I IpAD/'j , i ~~4 I l·: ' 'l~o£Jt I W6fi I ---~ __ ":"~ I ',, ,,1 t1 I I L ~ I ~ J 4()1. , ',. . I ~ - - -I . I I Te; ~ ' _____ A~----------::! :~~~;~;~C't~:;::::f~:::-~:~~:1?)\ C':~:ll:~~~~ : r-ff."1 / cl:~: 'l: J u : 1;, /- • ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~l-:- , I ' I , 13 [PAD ELI i I I -f02.0 1< ~ l!!2:!.£..J 1\ ii r,-i9-:'I~--~i8 ~1';-'~~9'··11~'P:N-~[:i .. 25 :: 24' r-·--=---= ___ ~ _ ---~ , , ' I''''' "'I . ~,n" I "'"-, : I "",' ,':,' ~ '. Ip,," "'I . ' .. 23. 4O<-.S I . , I ' 1 : ~ r .IO.S I ~ II' )11 '1.-, "', ' ~~ ,/ I I: I '''',' • .~/, • 'J'_' HP I i -,;; ..... it: ~ ~ , I' ,01 'I' ' I , . IpAD al II -wu 7 ;:";:·~3~ .. : 6 I Ip~ fl·1 : -4b2..~ I Ai' :\' 'I; '~I ,1J;A~Tl'I, l-m I I, , I, I. CII'l OCO,', I I '/' 'I'· "I' 'I ':1 ' , I 5, i 4 I J 2 I 1 I JP,:W£[I '[PAD £lj I lPA"OELI I ~ II I JiiADl[I I "II~II'I.w .. O 11'1~.'I'!~ q,!~. I ' I I , ' i! )1' I j 1 L.. _ '1_ 1L. _ J. IJ //11 ...?I >--....:..-+----'!-----+---"--" ~--...,:.....;., JERfCHO A VENUE NE 1144 TH A VENUE SEI --,(. .L ~ f.c 32 JJ .J4 ~ IPAVELI 7 '.' <fr •. s ZfJ --/-;-~~--< r ~._..L._>_..J Access Easerrltmt ., Q ;; ~ " ~,2 " , -" ,. ~_II' © 2005 TR'AD ASSOCIATES ~IWMl - ;§ " '" '<J ~ ~ (> <;; .2 ~ " ~ " " "' ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ % ~ " " "' " % ~ ~ Cl siS "112,,(;\'1Av~.NE "'_nO, WA 980~H'\I2J 42581184<18 ~2'5,a21 34!1 fu soc 468 0156 ",111_ www.~JOO!""""'''''''' >- ~~ ~~ !l)tc:: ~(,) (> :t: "').. ~~ " '" o >-- <:J ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ... a ,. ... G @\" LU .,_", .---~.-.-. "~I I·J·)·,<},!} ' .. ,11 ~J~\I,-M::A~' f'£ ""-'---1(_,1,. 'r1IIG.!!!,--~ !'f:oJfl"T SllRrElOH ~:~1:N~;Rrr: ..urnrr L cox, Asv, i'li~}m ]):xt.:~r~J;i AP,I'lIfTFi flR:'T S'JBIll1--:-Al D.Hr: S("~Lt:, Hem '"=BO' WflT..N/A Jill' N" ,T~~)' ~(lT 'iALifI 1I',IJ>" ~I(,'IF,P ,\~D UATI[J 03-185 1 ~"----"'---"J..JI-----=~: '::0" -"''D' -P-M' -, ~I -_~ ~_.~" ::IDihr:"\~~Ji~I.~.41i:'*¥!~_-"':WlIii"J.4\i'Jr€;,£~J[~-il~:-~';;?:L \H~::~~.·~'tEi;l-1.'---,-'(l~~~\;ll1t::..T;::lI';;,;~;,,;ili;;ivifl€k~&lJ(l,tA'Glllh,.QJ, r PT b~.g--7tc-::-~: __ -L JL~l k-_ U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE T-'-~-. II ... ·:· .. ih~. .0: SCL'1It? 1-24 000 ',I 1.; [.1Ik', ci:i=Ji/-I __ ?¥? -r _ c=:;:--_-" _~ _::J =3 ~"C'JOO <j():J(' 3-:)00 -'OlX' :Ol'<':: (I ~t)CO lOCD~) FeEt ThiS map IS on£' c-f a set pl.'bllsned I') 1972 c;s a soil survey L:y the UndeJ States De;:Jartmen! ni Agr'lculturp, Soil CO;I::'Fr"'0tlo'l SerVice, ,'Hid tht /V'asill'lgto l-, AgricuilG.'al txpHlllltont StMlcn part cf Jr-, '-'.W I, ;)ne co{ ~ ,.e\ 01 ~(1 ,\1,' '\ ;'i)'.')-·II~ 1,:(' N SHEET NO. II KING COUNTY AREA, WASHINGTON (RBNTON QUADHANGLE) Py Ai;r lH(] (lOO rEET '-;' ~7' "C" 122"07'30'" , PPRDX\IVJA!E N o-r 1'0 ScAL.,f3 C'rU:upfwtcb.,~", c·::npiled if-lCJiO t:, "SGS c",cl'·i"10trlc 001dll 00tiJlfkj ffU:ll USG~) 7~'2 ml-1U~',: Stories 'l~-'p:) ~'c,I'r'conlc prOlection 1927 r\'(\rtll f,m2!-'COln daturn lc-,DOO-fO(lt gr-id based on VV",c:hingtoll cOCrd'll.1tc ::'ystCT nwl!1 Lone Map Unit Legend King County Area, Washington Map I symb~_ Map unit name AgB AgC AgD AkF AmB AmC An BeC BeD BeF Bh Br Bu Cb Ea EvB EvC EvD EwC InA InC InD Kp8 KpC KpD Ma NeC Ng Nk No Or Os OvC OvD OvF Pc PITS Pk Pu Py RaC RaD RdC RdE Re Rh Sh Sk Sm AlderNood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes Aldelwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 151030 percent slopes Alderwood and Kitsap soils, very steep Arenls, Alderwood material, 0 to 6 percent slopes Arenls, Alderwood material, 6 to 15 percent slopes Arenls, Everett material Beausite graveUy sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes Beausite gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes Beausite gravelly sandy loam, 40 to 75 percent slopes Bellingham silt loam Brisco! silt loam Buckley silt loam Coastal beaches Earlmont silt loam Everett gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes Everett gravelly sandy loam, 51015 percent slopes Everett gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes Everetl-Alderwood gravelly sandy loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes Indianola loamy fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes Indianola loamy fine sand, 4 to 15 percent slopes Indianola loamy fine sand, 15 to 30 percent slopes Kitsap silt loam. 2 to 8 percent slopes Kitsap silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Kitsap silt loam. 15 to 30 percent slopes Mixed alluvial land Neilton very gravelly loamy sand. 2 to 15 percent slopes Newberg silt loam Nooksack silt loam Norma sandy loam Orcas peal Oridia silt loam Ova II gravelly loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes Ova II gravelly loam. 15 to 25 percent slopes Ova II gravelly loam. 40 to 75 percent slopes Pllchuck loamy fine sand Pits Pilchuck fine sandy loam Puget silly clay loam Puyallup fine sandy loam Ragnar fine sandy loam. 6 to 15 percent slopes Ragnar fine sandy loam. 15 to 25 percent slopes Ragnar-Indianola association. sloping Ragnar-lndianola association. moderately steep Renton silt loam Riverwash Sammamish silt loam Seattie muck Shalcar muck Natural Resources Conservation Service Tabular Data VersIOn: 1 Tabular Data Version Date: 09/21/2004 Page1of2 Map symbol Sn So Sr Su Tu Ur W Wo Si sill loam Snohomish silt loam Snohomish silt loam, thick surface variant Sultan silt loam Tukwila muck Urban land Water Woodinville silt loam Natural Resources Conservation Service Map Unit Legend King County Area, Washington Map unit name Tabular Data Version: 1 Tabular Data Version Date: 09/21/2004 Page 2 of 2 o o z c =i 5 z en Qo D m o c: li m s: m ~ en en c: s: s: :I> D -< en m (') :::! o z Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report 2 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (To be included at a later date) !TRIAD , A' '" ': I ~ [ "' --- Page 3 I o "T1 "T1 en =i m » z » r--< en iii en m o ::! o z Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report 3 OFFSITE ANALYSIS Please refer to the "Shy Creek Level I Downstream Analysis" by Triad Associates, dated January 12,2006, as submitted to the City of Renton on January 27, 2006, March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 Page 4 I "T\ r o ~~ 00 -0 c Z CJ) -i-i -<::0 m » 0 0 Zr -I »11" (5 !<~ z ~» -< W-i em m::O WO -c: G'l» zr ~ Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report 4 FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 4.1 DRAINAGE CONCEPT The detention volume in the wetpond was sized with King County's computer program KCRTS. Using sizing criteria set forth in the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual, the site will release water at the Level Two Flow Control standard per the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual. The KCRTS Level 2 flow control standard requires maintaining the durations of high flows at their pre-development levels for all flows greater than one-half of the 2-year peak flow up to the 50-year peak flow. The pre- development peak flow rates for the 2-year and la-year runoff events are also required to be maintained. Dead storage in the wetpond will be used for water quality treatment. The drainage concept includes some areas that must bypass the proposed facility. Runoff from the bypass areas will be modeled and compensated for within the new facility. Refer to the North and South Onsite Existing Conditions Exhibits and the Developed Conditions and Conceptual Outfall Exhibit for the delineation of these areas. 4.2 KCRTS METHODOLOGY The King County Runoff Time Series (KCRTS) program was developed as a hydrologic modeling tool for western King County. The runoff files have been pre-simulated for a range of land cover conditions and soil types for different regions of King County using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's HSPFIO model. The HSPFlO model was calibrated with regional parameters developed by the U.S. Geologic Survey and King County Basin Planning. The KCRTS program simulates the project hydrology through the scaling, summing, lagging, and level-pool routing of runoff files. The KCRTS program includes a group of analytical tools to provide statistical data on the generated time series files. March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 Page 5 Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report The KCRTS Level 2 standard requires the project to maintain the flow durations at their predevelopment levels for flows greater than one-half of the 2-year flow up to the 50-year flow (predeveloped). A target duration curve (generated from thc existing conditions time series), and the detention facility outflow duration curve are generated using KCRTS. The duration curve graph plots now rates verses probability of exceedence (on a logarithmic scale). The detention facility characteristics (facility dimensions, discharge structure configuration, etc.) are manipulated to adjust the facility outflow duration curve until it approximately matches the target duration curve over the required range. This iterative process is repeated until the facility oult1ow duration curve is strictly below the lower end of the target curve (corresponding to 50% of the existing 2-year flowrate) and does not exceed the target curve by more than 10% at all other durations in the range. Additionally, the 2-year and la-year peak discharges must be below the 2-year and 10- year existing runoff rate. A summary of the results from the detention calculations is included in the tl)llowing pages. Actual KCRTS output (i.e. basin summaries, stage/storage/discharge table, inflow and outflow durations, etc.) is located at thc cnd of this section. Please refer to the North and South Onsite Existing Conditions Exhibits and the Developed Conditions and Conceptual OutfaIT Exhibit at the end of this section for basin delineation. According to Table 3.2.2.B from the 2005 KCSWDM the estimated Regional Scale Factor for the Rainfall Region is a Sea-Tae value of 1.0. The site is underlain with Alderwood soil, which is classitied as hydrologic soils group "C" or Till soils. (Please see Figure 3.2.2A from the 2005 KCSWDM, Soil Conservation Services (SCS) map and SCS legend located at the end of the section) Pre-developed Basin Modeling The areas used in the modeling of the pre-developed basin consist of the 16.14 acres of site area plus 1.03 acres of otTsite tributary area (Hoquiam Avenue ?-JE, Jericho Avenue NE, SE 2 nd Street, NE 2nd Street frontages). The boundary for the existing basin area is March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 Page 6 Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report represented on the North and South Onsite Existing Conditions Exhibits. There is an existing stream flowing through and across the site to the west and south. This area including it's associated buffer was not included in area calculations as this is a protected area that will remain undisturbed in the developed condition and will not be conveyed or detained in the onsite facility, Wctpond -Pre-developed Conditions Total Tributary Area: AT = 17.17 acres The entire site area was modeled as till forest. Where: Atf = 17.17 acres, till forest Total Area = 17.17 acres (site area + offsite tributary area)) Existing Till Fo.':est~_=_1_7_._17~a_c_re_s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The scale factor for the site is Sea-Tac 1.0 as seen on KCSWDM Figure 3.2.2A shown at the end of this section. The peak analysis for the pre-developed north tributary area is shown below: Flm·.J Frcqur::J.cy l\nalysis Time Series File:predev.tsf Project Localion:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak 1:'low Rale Rank (CFS) l. 08 2 0.294 7 0.803 4 0.028 8 0,47 G 6 0,831 3 0.701 ; .38 1 Computed Feaks March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 Flow Raxes--- Time of Peak 2/09/01 18:C)Q 1/06/02 3:00 2/28/03 3:00 3/24/04 20:00 1105/05 8:00 1/18/06 21:00 11124/06 4:00 1/D9/013 9:00 -----Flow Frequency Ana~ysis------- - -Peaks Rank Reo t ll::::-n Prob (CFS) Period l. 38 1 100.00 (;.gg.:) l. 08 2 25.00 D.9GO 0.83J 3 10,00 C.900 0,803 4 5.00 U . r.' ():) 0,701 5 3.00 C.667 0.476 6 2,00 0.50':1 0.294 7 l. 30 C . /: ::)1 0,025 8 1 .10 C.D91 1. 78 50.00 C.9S:J /tEIAP Page 7 -- Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report 4.3 Developed Basin Modeling In order to size the wetpond. time series files were created for both the developed basin and the flow-control bypass area for the developed condition. A Point of Compliance analysis was used to size the detention facility while accounting for the bypass area not being detained. The point of compliance was located at the discharge location of the proposed outfall. As a part of this iterative design process within the KCRTS program. the post-developed runoff time series file for the site was routed through the proposed pond, and a new time series file was created for the facility's discharge. The time series file for the bypass area was summed with the pond's discharge time series to create a new time series that represented the total storm water to be discharged from the site at the downstream point of compliance. Flow duration curves were created for the target pre- developed runoff time series, the pond outlet time series, and the point of compliance time series and then compared to determine whether the detention facility satisfies the detention criteria discussed previously. The pond geometry and restrictor orifice specifications were adjusted during this iterative process until the detention pond configuration was established. The detention facility meets the design criteria by restricting the flow durations for the storm water discharged from the project site to be strictly below the target flow durations. In addition, the peaks calculated at the point of compliance (POC) for the 2-and 1 O-year return periods are less than the existing peaks. The areas used in the modeling 0 r the developed basin consist of the parcels to be developed and the developed half street improvements for the adjacent public roads. Wetpond -Developed Area Total Tributary Area: AT = 16.60 acres Impervious area: Ai = 10.56 acrcs Pervious area: A'r = 6.04 acres, till grass The peak analysis for the developed tributary area is shown below: March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 ItlWW ---- Page 8 Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:developed.tsf Projecl Localion:Sea-Tac ---J'.Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flo\-l" Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 3.10 6 2/09/01 2:00 2.53 8 1/05/02 16:00 3.72 3 2/27 /03 7:00 2.71 7 8/26/04 2:00 3.30 ·1 10/28/01 16:00 3.29 " l/l8/06 16:00 3.99 2 10/26/06 0:00 6.27 1 1/09/08 6:00 Computed Peaks ~---~- 4.4 Bypass Area Modeling -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- - -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 6.27 1 100.00 3.99 3.72 3.30 3.29 3.10 2.74 2.53 5.51 ) 3 4 5 6 '7 8 ?S.UO 10.00 5.00 3.00 2.00 1. 30 1.10 50.00 0.990 1J.960 0.900 0.800 0.667 0.500 O.23i 0.091 0.980 A bypass area of 0.57 acres is shown on the Developed Conditions and Conceptual Outfall Exhibit, all of which is located within the pre-developed basin boundaries. The time series file for KCRTS models the bypass with the following areas: Total Tributary Area: AT = 0.57 acres Impervious Aarea: AI = 0.57 acres The bypass area will contribute a Q2= 0.142 cfs and QIO = 0.169 cfs according to the flow frequency analysis shown below. These flows bypass the wetpond, but must meet requirements at a point of compliance downstream of the vault and bypass. The following is the peak analysis for the developed bypass area. Flow Frequency AnaJ_ysis Time Serj_es Filc:bypass.ts£ Project Locaticn:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak flv.v Rate Rank (CPS} J . ~ 38 7 J. ~22 8 :J.:6'1 3 :; . ~ 4 2 6 '0, :.. 68 .j :.; . :.. 4 8 Co :]. ) J"i 2 :-; . ;: G '0 1 I Cc::mp\:r.cc: Peaks March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 Flm-, Rates--- Time of Peak 2/09/01 ):00 1/05/02 :6:00 12/08/02 :8:00 8/26/04 2:00 1O/2E104 16:00 J/18/06 16:00 10/26/06 0:00 1/09/08 E:OO -----Flow Frequerlcy Analysi~------- - -Pedk~ Rank Return Prob reFS) Period 0.269 1 100.CO 0.990 0.207 2 20.00 0.960 0.169 3 10.00 0.900 0.168 4 5.00 0.200 0.1 S 9 5 3.00 0.667 0.142 6 2.0C 0.500 [) .122 .... 1 .3e O.2l] U.l27 8 1.1 C 0.091 ~) _? {, R 50.00 0.920 /tRIAD Page 9 , 0' S" (1 ,T C, Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report Pond Modeling The wetpond was modeled with a design depth of 8 feet, and the resulting theoretical pond is summarized below: Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Side Slope: Pond Bottom Length: Pond Bottom Width: Pond Bottom Area: Top Area at 1 ft. FB: Effective Storage Depth: Stage 0 Llevation: Storaqe Volu;ne: Riser Head: Riser Head: Riser Diameter: Number of O~i£ices: Orifice # Heiqhl ! ft) 1 0.00 2 5.65 3 E. 10 PO::l.d 3.00 il:lV 182.00 ft 95.0C ft 17290. sq. ft 35164. sq. ft 0.807 acres 8.0C [L O.OC ft 191648. cu. ft ';.537 ac~ft 8.00 ft B.OO ft 18.DO inches Diameter (in; 1.88 2.50 3.25 Full Head Discharge (CFS) 0.270 0.260 0.395 Top Nolch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None .:. Theoretical storage volume = 197,648 ft3 .:. Design storage volume = 217,413 fe .:. Provided storage volume = 224,364 fe Pipe Diamet.cr (in) 6.0 6.0 A 10% factor of safety was used to compensate for potential construction constraints in the design storage volume. The provided storage volume results in a 13.5% construction factor of safety. The table shown below represents the outflow from the proposed detention facility. March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 !TRIAD A" 'J C I A T [, ---- Page 10 Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report Hyd In£lo1tl Outtlo't.' Peak Storage Stage Elev leu-H) I]\,c-Ft) 1 6,n 3,63 8,32 8.32 208266. 4.781 2 3.10 0.92 7.99 7.99 197196. ·1.527 3 3,770 0.80 7.33 7.33 176;061. 4.046 4 3.12 0.78 7.25 7.25 173616. 3.986 5 3.29 0.45 6.28 6.28 144286. 3.]12 6 2.74 0.19 3.77 3.77 77729. 1.784 "I 2.53 0.22 5.21 5.21 1.14363. 2.625 8 1.95 0.23 5.69 5,69 127617. 2.930 The following demonstrates the combined outflow of the proposed detention facility and the bypass area, which is the peak rate of runoff that would be discharged from the site after development. fIye! RID Facil~ty Tributary Reservoir POC Outflo;"r Outflow Inflow 1nf101--1 Target Calc 1 3.63 0.27 ******** ******* 3.73 2 0.92 0.14 ******** 1.28 U.9[1 3 0.80 0.16 *******-} .. -A *-1. * *-1. 0.84 4 0.78 0.15 ******** ******* 0.82 5 0.45 0.15 ******** ******* 0.1.5 6 (1-19 O.H ***'****" ,,-. *" -. * A 0.31 7 0.22 0.12 ******** ******* 0.31 6 0.23 0.09 ******** ******* 0.29 Due to limitations of running the KCRTS program with reduced runoff record files, information for the 50-year duration curves is not available. Because of this, the upper limit of the target duration curve is based on the 25-year existing design storm event. Based on discussions with King County personnel responsible for creating the KCRTS program, the difference in volume of a detention facility sized using the 25-year duration curve versus a facility sized using the 50-year duration curve is negligible. March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 Page 11 Shy Creek -Preliminary Technicallnformalion Report 4.3 WATER QUALITY VOLUMES Per the 2005 KCSWDM (2005 Manual), the Basic Waler Quality Menu will be used for water quality lrealment. The site will utilize dead storage in the wetpond for water quality treatment. Wetpond Tributary Area = 17,17 acres The wet-pool volume (Vb) is calculated from finding the volume of runoff (V,) from the mean annual storm and multiplying it by a wet-pool volume factor (j) of 3, Use equation 6-13 from the 2005 KCSWDM. V,= (0.9Aj+ 0.25A'g + O,IOA tf + O.OIAo) * R where V, = volume of runoff from mean annual storm (cf) Ai = area of impervious surface (sf) A'g = area of till soil covered with grass (sf) A,r= area of till soil covered with forest (sf) Ao = area of outwash soil covered with grass or forest (sf) R = rainfall from mean annual storm (feet) [Figure 6.4.1.A) Ai = 459,993 sf A'g = 263,102 sf Atf= 0; Ao = 0 R = 0.039' [Figure 6.4, 1.A) Vr = (0.9(459,993) + 0.25(263,102) + 0.10(0) + 0.01(0» * 0.039 = 18,711 cf Vb= VJ = (18,711)(3) = 56,133 cf The required weI-pool volume for the site is 56,133 cubic feet. The provided volume in the wetpond is 69,219 cubic feet providing a factor of safety of23.3%. March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 Page 12 - " II II I I, ! I , " " I , I !I /11 0' Iii .' I I' I NO.1 fJNIHS lfM 'N01N31i dO All;) )/331:J~ AHS ANtldWO:; S3WOH 1i3NNO:; 31lS HlliON 1/fl/HX3 SNOlllaNO:; 9NIlS/X3 31lSNO -, § - 0 JNJ 000101 , I Clfo ---JNJ aoolol -,; --, 0 CO II = ..... W ....J « () (f) , , 0 '" 0 <X> 0 ..,. a ~~ ~~ "'---),,:, o&w .. :; -----," ,-'-E} C) .' jI rdOl:ld ',g I z 0 0 < 8 , 3 z 0 ~ ~ < < > ~ < 0 '" " ill C , c 2 < ~ / ~ , - El'~ r:,{.j ,,:;r:iiJ ":C)'O .. ~ en o o N L ( NOlfJNIHSlfM 'N01N3d dO UfO ) H o I i ! )l33H:J AHS J.NtfdWOa S3WOH H3NNOa 311S Hlnos 1181HX3 SNOlllGNOa 9NI1SIX3 311SNO I~ i~ ~-----;-~~- .~\~~H'O" \ ',,_ 'II , \ . , \", \ '. '. .\ . \ . \" _.\ 0.& ~ " 0 < ? ~ ~ 'b !f a '" 0 CO II = T"" a '" W ...J <! a () ... (/) a o ~g f"'J o ~ L~ ~ ~~ .. ~ ~ ," '".: ~. JildOl:ld '£ ~J Jog NOJSI~311 uva 'Oil . ,: . I , 6 I 386 ''-1'; nos 'DMp -SUO///PUO:) CUilSiX] ;)J/suQ \ Sl.'Q!4X]\ sa,uj 5M O\;8 Li 1. ).itOC'd\ }1'011 ';..' .= '~O(>7 '(d) ;.")(1 '~/;;. N01DNIHSV'M ',' '.' W \ 17 U=, ~ . ®~ 1,1" . , --, LL, I gtj-1 ~ ,~ '. 'N01N3li dO A.1D I 1= i IC~ I ,\..'.., ;;L --i, c,, ,.\ . . ' :2 ~((Si\Td ~.]Va O~ : \8 '13Ii1I.'J~ f13311.J..S ON&CI 35/ .J..33H.J..$ aN~ 51N f.13311.15 H.19CI 3$/ 133Hl S aN& 35 ',' , <C '" , ,. . ,. l I"j ! ' , ! r'~ , I I "I I I j I I .'! 1 SCALE: 1" = 120' o 60 120 ~ , '" : ""'-"':)'-"")'~~ (j) w '0 o o N Q 3-21-06.exc KCRTS program ... File Directory: C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\ [cl CREATE a new Time Series ST 17 .17 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 PREDEV.tsf T 1.00000 T [Cl CREATE a new Time Series ST 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 6.04 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 10.56 0.00 0.000000 DEVELOPED.tsf T 1.00000 T [Cl CREATE a new Time Series ST 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.57 0.00 0.000000 BYPASS.tsf T 1.00000 T [T] Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module [p] compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies predev.tsf PREDEV.pks [p] Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies developed.tsf DEVELOPED.pks [p] compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies bypass.tsf Till Forest Till Pasture Ti 11 Grass Outwash Forest Outwash pasture Outwash Grass wetland Impervious Till Forest Till Pasture Till Grass Outwash Forest Outwash Pasture outwash Grass wetland Impervious Till Forest Till Pasture Till Grass outwash Forest outwash Pasture outwash Grass wetland Impervious BYPASS.pks [0] compute Flow DURATION and Exceedence predev.tsf TARGET.dur F F 36 0.300000E-01 0.238000 [0] Compute Flow DURATION and Exceedence page 1 3-21-06.exc bypass.tsf BYPASS.dur F F 36 O.SOOOOOE-02 O.710000E-Ol [R] RETURN to previous Menu [F] Size a Retention/Detention FACILITY Manual Design POND.rdf 5 Route Time series o Return to Main Menu [F] Size a Retention/Detention FACILITY Manual Design POND. rdf 5 Route Time Series o Return to Main Menu [F] Size a Retention/Detention FACILITY Manual Design POND. rdf 5 Route Time series o Return to Main Menu page 2 Flow Frequency Analysis Time series File:predev.tsf project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 1.08 2 2/09/01 18:00 0.294 7 1/06/02 3:00 0.803 4 2/28/03 3:00 0.028 8 3/24/04 20:00 0.476 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.831 3 1/18/06 21:00 0.701 5 11/24/06 4:00 1. 38 1 1/09/08 9:00 computed Peaks PREDEV.pks -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- - -peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 1. 38 1 100.00 0.990 1.08 2 25.00 0.960 0.831 3 10.00 0.900 0.803 4 5.00 0.800 0.701 5 3.00 0.667 0.476 6 2.00 0.500 0.294 7 1. 30 0.231 0.028 8 1.10 0.091 1.28 50.00 0.980 Page 1 Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:developed.tsf project Location:sea-Tac ---Annual peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 3.10 6 2/09/01 2:00 2.53 8 1/05/02 16:00 3.72 3 2/27 /03 7 :00 2.74 7 8/26/04 2:00 3.30 4 10/28/04 16:00 3.29 5 1/18/06 16:00 3.99 2 10/26/06 0:00 6.27 1 1/09/08 6:00 Computed peaks DEVELOPED.pks -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- - -peaks Rank Return prob (CFS) Period 6.27 1 100.00 0.990 3.99 2 25.00 0.960 3.72 3 10.00 0.900 3.30 4 5.00 0.800 3.29 5 3.00 0.667 3.10 6 2.00 0.500 2.74 7 1. 30 0.231 2.53 8 1.10 0.091 5.51 50.00 0.980 Page 1 Flow Frequency Analysis Time series File:bypass.tsf project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.138 7 2/09/01 2 :00 0.122 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.169 3 12/08/02 18:00 0.142 6 8/26/04 2:00 0.168 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.148 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.207 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.269 1 1/09/08 6:00 computed peaks BYPASS.pks -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- - -peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.269 1 100.00 0.990 0.207 2 25.00 0.960 0.169 3 10.00 0.900 0.168 4 5.00 0.800 0.148 5 3.00 0.667 0.142 6 2.00 0.500 0.138 7 1. 30 0.231 0.122 8 1.10 0.091 0.248 50.00 0.980 Page 1 Flow Frequency Analysis Time series File:dev_15.tsf project Location:sea-Tac ---Annual peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 5.03 6 8/27/01 18:00 3.57 8 1/05/02 15:00 10.85 2 12/08/02 17:15 4.05 7 8/23/04 14: 30 6.20 4 11/17/04 5:00 6.02 5 10/27/05 10:45 7.02 3 10/25/06 22 :45 15.50 1 1/09/08 6:30 computed Peaks -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- - -peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 15.50 1 100.00 0.990 10.85 2 25.00 0.960 7.02 3 10.00 0.900 6.20 4 5.00 0.800 6.02 5 3.00 0.667 5.03 6 2.00 0.500 4.05 7 1. 30 0.231 3.57 8 1.10 0.091 13.95 50.00 0.980 Page 1 Retention/Detention Facility l'ype of Facility: Side Slope: Po~d Bottom Length: Pond Botto~ Width: Pond Bottem Area: Top Area at 1 ft. FE: Effective Storage Depttl: Stage 0 Elevation: Storage Volume: Riser Head: Riser Diar.leter: Number of orjfjces: Detentio;1 Pond 3.00 H:IV 182.00 ft 90.00 ft 1!2 90. sq. :t 35164. sq. it 0.807 acres 8.00 ft 0.00 ft 197648. cu. ft 4.537 ac-it 8.00 ft 18.0C inches ., Full Head Pipe Orifice # Eeight Diameter Di scharge Diamele.c 1 2 J Top Nacc:l Cut flow RatiLg In) 0.08 ~) . 6S 6. 10 Weir: Curve: Stage Eleva:::ior. (in) leFS) (in) 1. 8 g 0.270 2.50 0.260 6.0 3.25 0.395 6.0 None None Storage Discharge ( tt) (ft) (cu. :t) (ac-ft) (c:fs) 0.00 0.00 O. 0.000 0.000 0.02 0.02 316. 0.008 0.013 0.04 0.01 693. 0.016 C.019 0.06 0.06 1040. 0.024 o . 023 0.08 C.08 ~389. 0.032 0.07.7 0.10 0.10 1737. 0.04C 0.030 1).12 0.12 2087. 0.048 0.033 1J.14 0.11 2437. 0.056 0.035 0.16 O. J 6 2-/813 . 0.061 0.038 0.31 0.31 .5440. 0.125 0.053 (1.47 0.47 8311 . 0.191 0.065 0.63 0.63 11226. 0.258 O. 07~) 0.78 0.78 13997. 0.321 0.084 0.94 0.94 16997. 0.390 0.092 1. 10 1. 10 20040. 0.460 0.100 1.25 1. 25 229::;4. 0.521 0.107 1. 41 1. 41 26065. 0.598 0.113 1. 57 1. S OJ 29240. 0.67::' 0.119 1. 72 1.72 32258. 0.74: 0.125 1. S g 1.88 3~~2? O.d15 0.131 2.04 2.C~ 38832. 0.89: 0.136 2.20 2.20 42188. C.968 0.141 2.35 2.3:, ~5J76. 1.042 0.146 2,51 2. 5: '±:~,823, 1.121 C.151 2.67 2.67 ::23:7, 1.201 C.156 2.22 2.82 ~,5 E;j~. 1.211 C. ltO ::: . ~) ~3 >.01_: :; '0» 1 . 1 .~GC C . : G:, Percolation (c: f s) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.DO 0.00 C.Da 8.0C o.oe ~.oc D . D~; Surf Area (sq, ft) 172 90. 173/3 . 17357. 173 90. 17423. 17457. 17490. 1)':;23. 17557. 17809. 18079. 18351. 18608. 18884. 19162. 19424. 19 7 05. 19982 .. 20255. 20542. L08~~O. 211n. 21395. 2~()88. 2:984. 22263. 22562. 3.14 3.29 3.15 1.61 3.76 3.92 4.08 4.23 4.39 4.55 4.71 4. 86 5.02 S.18 5.33 5.49 5.65 5.68 5.7e 5. ) 3 5.75 5.78 5.81 5.83 5.86 5.88 6.04 6.10 6.13 6.17 6.20 6.24 6.27 6.3:) 6.34 6.37 6.40 6.56 6.72 6.88 7.03 7.19 7.35 7.50 7.66 7.8? 7.97 8.CO 8.10 8.20 8.30 8.48 8.:iD 8.60 8.70 8.8C 8.90 J.H 3.29 3.4::;, 3.6] 3.76 ].92 4.02 4.23 4.19 4.5S 4.71 4.86 5.0? 5.18 5.33 5.19 5. 65 5.68 5.70 5.73 5.7S ,':,.78 :;·.81 :J . G:3 ~) . (36 6.04 6.10 6.13 6. l7 6.)0 6 . .24 6.27 6.3U 6.34 6.3; 6.11 G 6.06 6.7? 6.82 i.C] 7.19 7.35 ! . 50 "1.66 7.22 ! . 97 2: . ;'0 2.30 8.4 C 8.50 62855. 66j06. 70034. 73811. 77 3 97. 81269. 85191. 88914. 92933. 97004. 101125. 105035. 109255. 113528. 117581. 121954. 126380. 127216. 127775. 128613 . '79174. 13C016. 11C8 60. 131423. 132270. 132S36. 137392 . 139114. 13997S. 141133. H2C02. 113162. 144035. HI; 910. 146079. ~469~8. 147839. 152571. 157357. 162198. 186787. 17113" . :76739. 181481. 186594. 191764. 196662. 197648. 2C0948. 2C4271. )D7616. 21C984. 214374. 2~7787. 221223. 22~G82. 2:":3lE.J. 1.443 1.522 1.608 1 . 694 1. 7 77 1. S 66 1.956 2.041 2.133 2.227 2.322 2.411 2.508 2.606 2.699 2.800 2.901 2.920 2.9Tl 2.903 2.965 2.985 3.004 3.017 3.037 3.049 3.154 3.194 3.213 3.240 3.260 3.221 3.307 3.327 3.3:;4 3.374 3.394 3 . .503 3.61L 3.724 3.829 3.942 ·1.057 4.166 4 .29 '1 4.402 4 . 515 tJ •. S37 4.613 4.689 4.766 4.844 ·1.921 ~. oo·~) ~ . C7 9 S_1.~f3 5.238 0.169 0.173 0.177 0.181 0.185 0.lS9 0.193 0.196 0.200 0.2:)3 0.207 0.210 0.214 0.217 0.220 0.223 0.227 0.229 0.234 0.243 0.254 0.268 0.28:; 0.303 0.30S 0.313 0.340 0.349 0.357 0.37e O. 387 ().410 0.437 0.469 0.502 0.:)34 C. 547 0.601 0.648 0.690 0.n9 o .76', 0.799 0.831 0.862 0.891 0.920 0,925 1.400 2.270 3.380 4.69C 6. ~ 7 CJ 7,620 8,1 GO U.E;O 9. 1 ~ (~ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oe 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 G.OO o.oe 0,08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 c.oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C).oo O.CO ~J . 0 () o.oe a.Ge 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.co 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.DO C.OO 0.00 0.00 O.OJ 0.00 C).DO ('. . :)0 ~_: • CJ U J.DC 22864. 23148. 2345;. 23759. 24048. 24358. 24670. 24964. 25280. 2559'1. 25917. 2621S. 26540. 26865. 27171. 27499. 27830. 27 892. 2793]. 27995. 280:]"1. 28099. 2816l. 28203. 28266. 28307. 28642. 2876S. 28831. 28915. 28978. 29063. 2912 G. n189. 79271. 29338. 29401. 29742. j()OS4. 30429. 30753. 3~101. 31451. :31780. 321:i3. 32188. 32823. 3/_2ge. 33114. 33339. 33565. j 3791 , 3/;OlS. 3'::;;;::46. 344f;J. 3LJ "/03. 3~933. 9.00 9.00 231669. 5.318 9.590 0.00 9.10 9.10 235197. 5.399 10.020 0.00 9.20 9.20 238718. 5.18: 10.430 0.00 9.30 9.30 212322. 5.563 10.830 0.00 9.40 9.40 245920. 5.646 11.210 0.00 9.=:'D 9.50 21951l. 5.729 11.580 0.00 9.60 9. 60 2:)3186. ~.812 11.930 0.00 9.70 9.70 2S6854. 5.897 12.28C) 0.00 9.80 9.80 260546. :) . 93] 12.610 0.00 9.90 9.90 264261. 6.067 12. 9~O O.CO Hyd I:1flow Outflow Peak S:orage Stage 1 6.27 3.63 8.32 2 3.10 0.92 7.99 3 3.72 0.80 7.33 4 3.12 0.78 7.25 5 3.29 0.45 6.28 6 2.74 0.19 3.77 7 2.53 0.22 5.21 8 1. 95 0.23 5.69 Elev 8.32 7.99 "1.33 7.2~ 6.28 3.77 5.2l 5.69 leu-H) 208266. 197196. 1767.61. 173616. 14428(. 77729. 114363. 1276P. Il\c-Ft) 4.781 4.527 1.016 3.986 3.312 1. 784 2.625 2.930 Hyd RID Facility TributC1ry Rp.scrvoir PCC OutflohT OutfloH Inflow Inflov1 1 3.63 0.27 .;..·*** ... ··k* ... 2 0.92 0.14 ******** 3 0.80 C.16 *******" 4 0.78 0.15 ******* ... 5 C . 45 O.l::i ******** 6 0.19 0.14 ****+-*** 7 0.22 0.12 *-!,-*-,c*-A-*+ 8 0.23 0.09 *** ... **** Route Ti.me Series through Facility I~flow Time Series E'ile:developed.ts[ Outflow Tine Series File:rdout POC Time Series File:DOWNSTREAM I~[low/Outflow Analysis Peak Inflow Cischargc: Peak Outflow Discharge: Peak Reservoir Stage: Peak Reservoir E~ev: 6.27 3. 63 8.32 8.32 CE'S CFS Fl Ft Target * -1.-* * -I,-... -k 1. 28 0.66 *****j,-* ****** ... C.33 -k.,.-**-A-k,,- +,,****.., at 6:00 al 10:00 Peak Reservoir Slorage: 208766. Cu-Ft 4.781 .i'>..c-F L Add Time Series:bypa~s.t~f Calc 3.73 o. 98 0.81 0.82 0.15 O. :3-L 0.3: 0.29 O~I Ja.n 9 ir, on Jon 9 in Year 8 Year 8 Peak SU:lUned Discharge: 3.)4 CFS Zlt lU:OCI :: .. n Jan 9 'In Year 8 Po~nt of Compliance rile: DovJNSTREAIvl. tsf 3516,. 35]95. 30627 . 30860. 36091. 36328. 36563. 36799. 37035. 37272. Flow Frequency Ana~ysis Time Series Fi:c:rdout.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Anr.ual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Pate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 1. 16 2 7/09/01 20:00 0,218 7 1/07/02 4:00 0,796 3 3/06/03 2:':00 0,185 8 8/26/04 8:00 0,233 6 1/08/05 5:00 0,446 c 1/19/06 1:00 0 0,773 4 11/24/06 8:00 3,64 1 1/09/08 10:00 Computed Peaks Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series ~'ile:downstream.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---;'\nnua I Peat: [10',\' Rates--- y.::..c' ...... Rate; RC)nk Time of Peak (nS) 1. 19 2 2/09/01 70:00 0,306 7 1/05/02 16:00 0.844 3 3/06/03 19:00 0,310 6 8/26/04 2:00 0,290 8 1/05/05 8:00 0.451 ') , /19/06 0:00 0,824 4 L/24/06 6:00 3.74 1 1/09/08 10:00 c::ompt.:ted PeaJ.::.s -----Flcw Frequency Analysis------- --Peaks --?.an% ReLL:rn Prob (CFS) (ft) Period 3, 64 8,32 1 100,00 0,990 1. 16 8,05 2 7.',,00 0,960 0,796 7,34 3 J 0,00 0,900 0,778 7,25 4 5.00 0,800 0,446 6,28 5 3,00 0.667 0,233 5,69 6 2,00 0.500 0,218 5.2] '/ 1. 30 0,231 0,185 3,78 8 1. 10 0,091 2,81 8.25 00,00 0,980 -----Flow Frequency Ana1ysi~------- - -Peaks Rank Return Prcb (CE'S) Period 3.74 1 lCO,OO 0,990 1.19 2 25.00 0.960 0,244 3 10,00 O.9·J;) 0,824 4 S.CO 0,800 0.451 , 3,00 0,667 0,310 6 2,[)O 0,500 O,30E 7 1,30 0,231 (), 290 8 1,10 0,091 2.29 50,00 0,980 Flm .. ,r Duration f rorr. Time Series File: rdout. Ls[ Cu~of[ Coun,: F:!:'eq'-.lenc::/ CDF Sxceedence Probability CF'S % '! 0, 0,016 31596 51. 526 51,526 48,474 O.48~)E+OO 0,049 "719'/ 11.737 63,263 36,737 0,367[+00 0,082 6365 '0,380 73.643 26,357 O,264E+OO 0,114 5 'IOE 9,305 82,948 17,052 O,171E100 0,147 4863 7,93J 90,879 9,121 0,9121::-01 0,179 2397 3,90J 94,780 5,220 O,522t;-Ol 0,212 1997 3.257 98,03'/ 1,963 O,l96E-01 0,244 792 1,301 99,338 (J,G6? O,662E-02 0.277 36 0,0'>9 99.397 0,603 0,6031::-02 0,309 Jl 0.C51 99,447 O,5:d C,553E-02 0,342 102 0,166 99.614 0.386 O,386E-02 C'.371 52 C,085 99,698 C,302 :J,307S-02 C, 4 C7 23 C,038 99,736 0,264 0, ?64E:-02 C , 4:! 9 19 C,031 99.767 0.233 0.233E-0) C.472 9 (J. ULI) 99,78~ 0.219 O,219E-02 C . :J ~-; 4 8 :J. 013 99.795 O,2J5 O,205E-02 C.S37 c, Cl.DCS 99.003 :). -9) O,197E-02 o .:::,69 15 0.024 99.82",1 o ' i =~ O,l'I3E-02 0.682 8 0,013 99.840 O,~60 O.168E-C) 0.63·1 1 :J 0.016 99.256 oJ. 14 ~ O,H4E-82 0.667 15 0.024 99.881 0.119 O.1l9E~02 0.699 9 0.015 99.896 0.101 O.104E~0) 0."132 9 0.015 99.910 0.090 O.897E~03 o .765 14 0.023 99.933 0.067 0.669E~03 O. '7 97 "9 0.031 99.961 0.036 0.359E~03 0.830 5 0.008 99.972 0.028 o. 277E~03 0.862 4 0.007 99.979 0.021 0.212E-03 0.895 5 0.008 99.987 0.013 0.130;0;-03 0.927 5 0.008 99.995 0.005 0.489E~04 0.960 Q 0.000 99.995 0.005 0.489E~04 0.992 1 0.002 99.997 0.003 0.326E~0'; 1. 02 0 0.000 99.997 o .fJ03 0."J26E~04 1. 06 0.002 99.998 0.002 O.163E~04 1. 09 0 0.000 99.998 0.002 0.163£-04 1.12 C 0.000 99.998 0.002 O.163F.-O·] 1. 15 0 C.OOO 99.998 0.002 0.163S-04 floltJ Duration fro::n Time " . .J'2rles F~ le:dovmstreaI!l..lsf Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Exceedence Probability - CFS % , " 't 0.017 31557 51. 463 S1.C63 48.537 0.485E+00 0.050 7076 1:.458 62.921 37.079 o. TI1E+OO 0.083 647; JO.471 73.392 26.608 O.266F.+OO 0.117 5675 9.255 82.647 17.353 0.174E+00 0.150 47]8 7.727 90.3)3 9.E27 o. 963;;~01 0.183 2552 4 .162 94.535 5.46:) 0.546E~01 C.216 1930 3 _ 1,'; 7 97.683 2.]17 O.2:J2E~01 0.250 8' " ,L 1.4D 99.105 0.895 0.895£-02 0.283 129 C.210 9 g. 31:-) C.6El5 0.685E~02 0.316 69 0.113 99.428 0.572 O.S72r.:-02 0.349 108 0.176 99.604 0.396 0.396E~02 0.383 4(3 0.078 99.682 0.318 0.318F~O; 0.416 )6 0.042 99.724 0.276 0.276E~02 0.449 24 0.039 99.764 0.236 0.236E~02 0.482 9 O.Ol~ 99. nil 0.222 O.222E~02 0.516 8 0.013 99.791 0.709 O.209E-02 0.549 S 0.013 99.804 0.196 O.196E~02 0.522 11 0.018 99.822 o .17E O.1I8E~02 0.615 1 J 0.0113 99.840 0.160 O.160E-02 0.648 9 1I . 1I1.5 99.855 0.145 O.145~-O) 0.682 13 O. C?-I 99.816 C.12<1 O.124E~02 0.715 10 0.0~6 99.892 0.108 O.108E~02 0.748 10 J.016 99.909 0.091 O.9l3E-C3 D.78: 13 8.021 99.930 0.070 U.701E~03 0.815 15 0.024 99.954 0.046 O.457F.~03 0.848 12 () . (J? II 99.974 0.026 0.261t:~03 0.881 3 0.005 99.979 0.021 O.212E~03 0.914 4 0.OC7 99.985 O. (n:) C.H7E~03 0.948 ·1 0.007 99.992 0.008 O.815E~04 (J.981 1 0.082 99.993 0.007 0.652£-04 1. 01 1 D.O~)) 99.99:) 0.005 0.48%-04 1.05 1 0.002 99.997 0.003 o. V6E-O·1 1. 08 1 O.OJ2 99.99B 0.OC2 0.163F:-O<l 1.11 Cl (I.ODO 99.998 0.J02 O.lE3:?>04 1. 15 0 O.DGC 99.992, 0.OJ2 0.1632:-04 1. U3 0 a.ooc 99.991J 0.082 O.163t:-C~ Duration Comparison AnayJ.sis Gase Flle: preoev.tsf New F~lc: downstream.[sf CJtoff Un':ts: Di.scharqe in CE'S -----Fraction of Time--------------Check of Cutoff Base New %Char:ge !?robability 0_/.38 ().9~E-J2 D_llE-Ol 10,8 I 0,951::-02 0,303 0,63E-n 0.64£-02 1.0 I 0.631::-02 0.368 O.5CJ£-02 0.34E-02 -31.6 I 0.50E-02 0.433 O.37E:-02 0.25E-02 -31.3 I 0.3"1£-02 0.498 0.29E-02 0.2:E-02 -25.1 I 0.29£-07 0.563 0.22E-02 0.19E-02 -14.7 ! 0.22E-02 0.028 0.15E-02 0.151::-02 5.6 0.]SE-02 0.693 0.10E-02 O. llE-02 12.9 0.10E-02 0.758 0_62£-03 0,88E-03 42.1 0.62E-03 0.823 ! 0.3I;E-03 0.42£-03 23.8 0.34E-03 0.888 0.23,,-03 O,21E-03 -7.1 O.23~-03 o. 9::-d 0_16E-ClJ 0.82£-04 -50.0 0.16S-03 1. 02 o .l1E-03 0.49E-04 -57.1 0.lE-C3 1. 08 0.16E-04 O,16E-04 0.0 O.16E-04 Maximum positive QXCllrsion = 0.110 cts lO.n) occurring a~ 1.08 cfs on the Gase Data:prcdcv.tsf arId al 1.19 cfs 0[1 tile New Data:downstrea~.tsf Maximu~ ~egat~ve excursion = 0.101 c[s (-19.4%: occurring a~ 0.522 cfs on the Sase Data:predev.tsf anc:! Jt r;. 4?J cfs on the Eev, Gata:dm·mstreaD. tsr Basp- 0,238 0.303 0.368 0.433 0.498 0.563 0.628 0.693 0.758 0.823 0.888 0.953 ] .02 1. 08 Tolera~ce------- New <.;:;Cha:-lge 0,244 2_8 0.304 0.3 0.330 -10.2 0.357 -17.4 0.407 -18.2 0.481 -14.4 0.647 :3 . 1 0.729 5.3 0.798 5,4 0.833 1.7 0.875 -1.4 0.908 -4.7 0.934 -8,2 1.19 9.9 SECTION 3.2 RUNOFF COMPUTATION AI\l) ANALYSIS METHODS FIGURE 3.2.2.A RAINFALL REGIONS AND REGIONAL SCALE FACTORS ST 1.0 ST 1.1 ST 1.1 ST 1.0 Rainfall Regions and Regional Scale Factors n r_~~~_~_~ I ncorporated Area] --c::J River/LakeD Major RoadC o 1/24/2005 LA 1.0 LA 1.2 COUNTY ST 1.01 LA 0.9 LA 1.0 lO(),; Surf<lCl' Water Dcsign l\lanltCll ,-22 3.2.2 KCRTSIRUNOFF FILES METHOD -GENER1TlNG nAIE SERlES ..... , 't>\~tE3.i;2'B.Jl!,~VfV~~l~~t.o~~tT.W~~&sc$S()itYfPESANri kt~ TSS()IV'fVPES·· .' •• u SCS Soil Type SCS KCRTS Soil Notes Hydrologic Group Soil Group Alderwood (AgB. AgC, AgD) C Till Arents, Alderwood Material (AmB, AmC) C Till Arents, Everett Material (An) B Outwash 1 Beausite (BeC, BeD, BeF) C Till 2 Bellingham (Bh) D Till 3 Briscot (Br) D Till 3 Buckley (Bu) D Till 4 Earlmont (Ea) D Till 3 Edgewick (Ed) C Till 3 Everett (EvB, EvC, EvD, EwC) AlB Outwash 1 Indianola (InC, InA, InD) A Outwash 1 Kitsap (KpB, KpC, KpD) C Till Klaus (KsC) C Outwash 1 Neilton (NeC) A Outwash 1 Newberg (Ng) B Till 3 Nooksack (Nk) C Till 3 Norma (No) D Till 3 Orcas (Or) D Wetland Oridia (as) D Till 3 avail (OvC, OvD, OvF) C Till 2 Pilchuck (Pc) C Till 3 Puget (Pu) D Till 3 Puyallup (Py) B Till 3 Ragnar(RaC, RaD,RaC,RaE) B Outwash 1 Renton (Re) D Till 3 Salal (Sa) C Till 3 Sammamish (Sh) D Till 3 Seattle (Sk) D Wetland Shalcar (Sm) D Till 3 Si (Sn) C Till 3 Snohomish (So, Sr) D Till 3 Sultan (Su) C Till 3 Tukwila (Tu) D Till 3 Woodinville (Wo) D Till 3 Notes: 1. Where outwash soils are saturated or underlain at shallow depth «5 feet) by glacial till, they should be treated as till soils. 2. These are bedrock soils, but calibration of HSPF by King County DNRP shows bedrock soils to have similar hydrologic response to till soils. 3. These are alluvial soils, some of which are underlain by glacial till or have a seasonally high water table. In the absence of detailed study. these sOils should be treated as till soils. 4. Buckley soils are formed on the low-permeability Osceola mudflow. Hydrologic response is assumed to be similar to that of till soils. 2005 SurCacc Water Design M,JnU31 1 i2-t'2f)(l5 3-25 64.1 WETPONDS -BASIC AND LARGE -METHODS OF ANAL I'S[8 FIGURE 6.4.1.A PRECIPITATION FOR MEAN ANNUAL STORM IN INCHES (FEET) ST 1.1 0.54" (0.045') '_._, ___ ! Incorporated Area .......c::) River/Lake Major Road 0.47" (0039') 0.47" (0.039') NOTE: Areas east of the eastemmost isopluvial should use 0.65 inches unless rainfall data is available for the location of interest ;>4 The mean annual storm IS a conceptual storm iound by diViding th!~ Clnnua! precIpitation by the lotal number of storm events per 'fear 0.52" (0.043') 0.56" (0.047') LA 1.0 LA 1.2 "WHQMISH (OU"'" result. gCllcralc:-) large amounts oCrullofL For this appliGltinn, lill ~oil types inc1urk Buckle:~/ and bedrock soils. and ailinial and outwash soils that hmT a seasonally high water table or an.: underlain at a shallow dcrth ()('s~ than 5 rl:ct) by glacial till. tI.S. Soil Conservation SCl"yicc (SCS') h):dro!ngJC soil groups that arC c!a,,",.:iilkd as till soiLs include a few B. most C, and all D soils. See Chapter 3 for classification ofspr..:cific SCS soil tYl1cs. 2005 SurL1Ct.' Water Design :Vl,lllU~d 1/24/1005 6-71 ~~~!!l.L·.......!..1 JC...Il!-''''·M-·'J n.. ,tt:.lJl!!"" ~ ........ " '~2!-c_:.:::t~, .; • ;~d m r.;: .2 .!&L ",,!I~L~';;<j~..a:t t':l,·!.!@;tf.U\~·.ii 1!i~~h~~~~~~~. \ tlfflJ!.)_:~$.b.aj:[U.:3f,I f :e .'tJ~<.'Jt~"\ .... 'i\i;~'l:iM '~.,..5.~\lht'i!il ::..,._,-"i.d,~,,:.,-,\i]Ii(S:'!~~~~.~ -,_O ~. r;:""---'-: -~. ~~"",,<=-- r U. S D E P A WfMEN T OF AG I{lCU LTlJI{E SO I L CON SE RVAT I ON SEHV I CE ----'-·~-·-M· -~-------c r ' ;in· -~ _-__ 11. I ....... (Join s slJ ee t J 6) Se a l!' 1 .2·) oon .2 ',1,1_ , J :::::=J "-' -=-., ==r -= _ I llOOO FeN !. -~ ! , ---.::::::::::: -I hOJ(J 5o~5-t=::i.4~ 3~ ?O(\G 1'JOO u -hi s mao 15 or·e 01 J se t ,ubii:-;h ed in 1972 as Pd rt o f a soil Su r vey uy Ihe Un l led ~)~<I t pos D(:paqmen t 0 ' A gltcil i t url:'. So'r (OI1',····' .. J!lcn Selv Ct', and the V()sh l ngtO;l i:'F.fI:-l. II.'a l r-X I ,erlw€nt S I-1t ion . .--.~r .~ .,.-, "r ., , .. t ,)1 Jr. . ! i " '" ... ~,,;./).: ij I' I -) I' -, N S lIEET NO. 11 K I Ne C O UNTY AHEA, WAS HI NG T ON (H E N T O N QUA DIl.A N ULE ) • I 'y ~w. fll<F [vf1 1/2°0 7'.10" ~7 °1()I 180000 FH r > o • ~'''o .'~ , ".,: ..... P~~.: .:~; ~ ~ r. RII loJ ~ , > -~-~~-- "7'lC' 122' 0 /'.10" A PPR'D XIMA'TE NDT \"0 S cALE OI:llO l ~ilO ·(,t.,:..>,:, '·l/-,lIco 1'1 19/0 b., dSG~:) Pl;:lilimetrlc deta il 'Jb t 1 !It,J 11 0m USGS ;:.;> I'llf1,J~.~ Serl('~ metp,> Pol ycorle I,ruwctr on 19)/ No,th A.mc r ic iln datum l O,aOO ·l no t t!IIU b,ls c d o n '0':"z hi llg t on coorJ rnJte sy':.t c'J' north 701,'" Map Unit Legend King County Area, Washington Map unit name Map symbol -----~----------------------------------------------------------------- AgB Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes Age Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes AgD Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. 151030 percent slopes AkF AldelWood and Kitsap soils. very steep ArnS Arenls, Alderwood material, 0 to 6 percent slopes Arne Arenls, Alderwood material, 6 to 15 percent slopes An Arenls, Everett material BeC Beausile gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes BeD Beausite gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes BeF Beausi\e gravelly sandy loam, 40 to 75 percent slopes Bh Bellingham silt loam Sr Brisco! silt loam Bu Buckley silt loam Cb Coastal beaches Ea Earlrnont silt loam EvB Everett gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes EvC Everett gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes EvD Everett gravelly sandy loam, 1510 30 percent slopes Ewe Everelt-Alderwood gravelly sandy loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes InA Indianola loamy line sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes InC Indianola loamy fine sand, 410 15 percent slopes InD Indianola loamy fine sand, 15 to 30 percent slopes KpB Kitsap silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes KpC Kitsap silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes KpO Kitsap silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes Ma Mixed alluvial land NeC Neilton very gravelly loamy sand, 2 to 15 percent slopes Ng Newberg silt loam Nk Nooksack silt loam No Norma sandy loam Or Orcas peat as Oridia silt loam OvC Ovall gravelly loam, 0 to 15 percenl slopes OvO Ovall gravelly loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes OvF Ovall gravelly loam, 40 to 75 percent slopes Pc Pilchuck loamy fine sand PITS Pits Pk Pilchuck fine sandy loam Pu Puget silty clay loam Py Puyallup fine sandy loam RaC Ragnar fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes RaD Ragnarfine sandy loam, 151025 percenl slopes RdC Ragnar-Indianola association, sloping RdE: Ragnar-Indianola association, moderately steep Rc Renlon silt loam Rh Rlverwash Sh Sammamish sill loam Sk Seattle muck Sm Shalcar muck Natural Resources Conservation Service Tabular Data Version: 1 Tabular Data Version Date: 09/21/2004 Page 1 of 2 Map symbol Sn So Sr Su Tu Ur W Wo Si silt loam Snohomish silt loam Snohomish silt loam, thick surface variant Sultan silt loam Tukwila muck Urban land Water Woodinville silt loam Natural Resources Conservation Service Map Unit Legend King County Area, Washington Map unit name Tabular Data Version: 1 Tabular Data Version Date: 09/21/2004 Page 2 of 2 o o z ~ -< 1> Z o m en -< ~ m ;: ~ en 1> m ,... C') ~ ;:j iii 0 Il<> Z c <: m en 5 z Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report 5 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 (To be included at a later date) Page 13 en ., m (") l> r II m ., o :lJ ;;J I/O ~ C C m (J) en m o :::! o z :S Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report 6 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 (To be included at a later date) ITRIAP ----~ Page 14 ~ ::I: m ::0 "'C m ::0 ;;: =i (f) en m (') ::! o z :s Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report 7 OTHER PERMITS • NPDES • Building Permits • FPA March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 ItR~ ---- Page 15 -f m \!l » z » ,.... < en iii Ro C m en i5 z (J) m o -I o Z ::; Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report 8 TESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be designed to reduce the discharge of sediment-laden runoff from the site. The plan will be comprised of temporary measures (rock entrance, filter fence, interceptor swales, etc.) as well as permanent measures (hydrosecding, etc). In general, runoff from the site will sheet flow across cleared areas into temporary interceptor swales with rock check dams placed approximately every 50 to I 50-feet depending on slope and into the permanent detention pond (to be used as a temporary sedimentation pond). In order to convey the runolI prior to the installation of the storm water pipes, temporary pipes along with portions of the permanent sections of the proposed conveyance system will be installed. Surface Area Calculations for TESC Pond QIO-devoloped = 7.02 cfs TESC Pond: SA 10 = 2080 sf/cfs x (Total Q10-devcloped) = 14,602 sf The design surface area of the pond is 14,602 sf. Dewatering Orifice I. The size of the dewatering orifice (minimum I-inch diameter) is determined below using a modified version of the discharge equation for a vertical orifice and a basic equation for the area of a circular orifice. March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 /tRIAP --- Page 16 Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report The required area of the orifice is calculated here using with the following equation from Appendix D (KCSWM) As(2h)Oj (-6)" Ao= 05=4.8110 A,-vh,where: 0.6 x 3,600Tg . . Ao = 4.81(W-' X14602)J8 Ao = 0.1987 sf As = 14,602 h=8ft 2. The required surface area of the orifice is converted to the required diameter D of the orifice here: D=24Xffi D = 13.54 x 0.1987 = 2.69 in The design diameter of the dewatering orifice is: D = 2.69 in Riser Calculation 1. Determine the required diameter for the principal spillway (riser pipe). This diameter shall be the minimum necessary to pass the pre-developed 1 OO-year peak flow (QIOO). Figure 5.3.4.H RISER INFLOW CURVES (KCSWDM Chapter 5) was used to determine this diameter (h = one foot). D=[ Q,oo I 9.739 * Hlfl j March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 Page 17 Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report D= 0.64 feet or 7.7 inches The 12" overflow riser is designed to pass the developed IOO-year peak flows of 6.27 cfs. Emergency Overflow Spillway 1. The emergency overflow spillway is designed to pass the 1 OO-year runoff event for developed conditions assuming a broad-crested weir. March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 L = [ Q,oo 3] + 2.4 * Hm 3.21 * H[') Using H = 0.50 feet, QIOO = 6.27 cfs, the length of the spillway is calculated as 5.9 feet", 6 ft. Page 18 SECTION 5.3 DETENTION FACILITIES 1/24/2005 Riser Overflow The nomograph in Figure 5 J.4.H may be used to determine the head (in feet) above a riser of given diameter and for a given flow (usually the lOO-year peak flow for developed conditions). 100 '0 c 0 u '" 1/1 ~ III "- "'iii 10 Ji u :0 ::J ~ 0 0.1 FIGURE 5.3.4.H RISER INFLOW CURVES 1 1 --i .. ·ri J~- 1 I 10 HEAD IN FEET (measured from crest of riser) Qww=9.739 DH312 Qorii,cc=3.782 D 2 H w Q in cfs, 0 and H in feet Slope change occurs at weir-orifice transition 2(J05 SurJace Water Design l\1,mual 5-48 I m o Z 1100 00 me OJ> r-z J>-I ;0- J>::! -1m -en 0-z-n OJ> -n!2 oC 0-1 z-< <en me z;:: J>;:: zJ> -1;0 m en CJ) m Q 6 z x Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report 9 BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT The Bond Quantities and Facility Summaries will be provided in the final version of the Technical Information Report. March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 Page 19 I a "tJ m JJ » -i a z (II 11" ;: ~ Z -i m z » z o m ;: » z c: » .- CJ) m o -I o Z x Shy Creek -Preliminary Technical Information Report 10 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL If required, the operations and maintenance infonnation will be provided with the Final Technical Information Report. March 22, 2002 Job #03-185 Page 20 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC. Environmental Consulting STREAM MITIGATION PLAN SHY CREEK PROJECT Renton, Washington Prepared/or: Conner Homes Company 846 108th Avenue NE Bellevue, Washington 98004 Prepared by: Cedarock Consultants, Inc. 19609 244th Avenue NE Woodinville, Washington 98077 March 22, 2006 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CiTY OF RENTON MAR 222006 RECEWED 19609 244'h AVENUE NE· WOODINVILLE, WA 98077 . P:4251788-0961 . F:4251788-5562 Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington TABLE OF CONTENTS Stream Mitigation Plan Page 1.0 PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION ...............................•........................................................................ 1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Stream Routing and Flow ............................................................................................ 2 3.2 Stream Classification ............................. "",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ................................................. 2 3.3 Physical Condition ....................................................................................................... 3 3.4 V egetati ve Cover .......................................................................................................... 4 3.5 Ecological Functions .................................................................................................... 4 3.6 Fish Use ........................................................................................................................ 8 3.7 Wildlife Use ......................... "'" """ ............................................................................. 8 4.0 RESOURCE AND FUNCTIONAL VALUES ................................•..........•......................... 8 4.1 Habitat Improvement Opportunity ....................... , ....................................................... 9 4.2 Function and Value Comparison .................................................................................. 9 4 .3 Summary.................................................................................................................... II 5.0 COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES .............................................................. 11 6.0 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE .................•................•...........•......................................... 12 7.0 SITE PROTECTION AND MAINTENANCE .....•........................................................... 12 8.0 ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ........................ 12 9.0 MONITORING .......•.....................................................................•...................................... 13 9.1 Sampling Methodology ................................................................ "" .......................... 13 9.2 Standards Of Success ................................................................................................. 13 10.0 CONTINGENCY PLAN ................................................................................................... 14 11.0 COST ESTIMATE ........•.•...............................................•........•.............•.....................•..... 15 12.0 COMPLIANCE WITH THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE .........•.•.....•................... 15 12.1 Mitigation Location .................................................................................................. 15 12.2 Mitigation Type ........................................................................................................ 15 12.3 Contiguous Corridors ............................................................................................... 15 12.4 Non-Indigenous Species .......................................................................................... 16 12.5 Equivalent or Greater Biological Functions ............................................................. 16 12.6 Minimum Mitigation Plan Performance Standards ................................................. 16 12.7 Based on Best Available Science ............................................................................. 17 13.0 COMPLIANCE WITH BEST AVAILABLE SCIENCE ............•............•..•.................. 17 13.1 Review of the Best Available Science Supporting the Proposed Request.. ............. 17 13.2 Report Authors Experience ...................................................................................... 21 13.3 Analysis of the Likelihood of Success of the Compensation Project ...................... 22 14.0 STREAM CROSSING IMP ACTS ................................................................................... 23 March 22. 2006 Conner Homes/Stream Mrtlgation Plan 032206.doc CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC Page i Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington TABLE OF CONTENTS Stream Mitigation Plan Page 15.0 VEGETATION PROTECTION ....................................................................................... 24 15.1 Design Considerations ............................................................................................. 24 15.2 Significant Tree Protection during Construction ..................................................... 24 16.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 25 APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 -SITE PLAN & GRADING PLAN .................................................................. 27 APPENDIX 2 -MITIGATION PLAN .•.•.....•.•.............................................•..........•...............•• 28 APPENDIX 3 -CORRESPONDENCE WITH WDFW .......................................................... 29 APPENDIX 4 -RESUMES FOR KEY MITIGATION DESIGN CONSULTANTS ........... 30 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Cost Estimate Worksheet ................................................................................................ 15 Table 2. Riparian Habitat Functions and Values .......................................................................... 18 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Vicinity Map .................................................................................................................... 1 Figure 2. Details from City of Renton Water Class Map ................................................................ 3 Figure 3. Photo: On-site stream channel existing condition ........................................................... 5 Figure 4. Photo: Stream channel (roadside ditch) along 142 nd Avenue SE .................................... 5 March 22, 2006 Conner flomes/Stream MItigatIOn Plan 032206.doc CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC Page ii Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington 1.0 PURPOSE Stream Mitigation Plan Development of the Shy Creek Project includes a proposal to fill 0,04 acres (1,713 square feet) of Class 3 wetland, work within 1 ~O-feet of a Class 4 stream, and provide an alternative stream buffer arrangement on the Class 4 Stream. This Stream Mitigation Plan has been prepared to satisfY requirements of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC) that require a mitigation plan if impacts are identified in the Supplemental Stream Study. In this case, wetland filling and the alternative stream buffer proposal constitute impacts. 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION The proposed action is located on approximately 16 acres in the City of Renton in King County (Figure I). A proposed site plan and grading plan are provided in Appendix I. A headwater tributary to the East Fork of Maplewood Creek (WRIA 08-0303) is located on the site. All site drainage runs west to Maplewood Creek and then south to the Cedar River (WRIA 08-0299) where it enters near river mile 3.4. The project is located in the NE y. of Section 15, T23N, R5E, W.M. > ~I li..±_, ~~-1--f;\~~-J , , , :_ i-1 I_I 1-1 , I Renton' i 'J Figure 1. Vicinity Map March 22, 2006 Conner Homes/Stream MitigatIOn Plan 032206.doc CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC Page I Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS Stream Mitigation Plan This section provides a description of existing habitat conditions of the stream channel and riparian buffer. Known fish and wildlife use is also described. 3.1 Stream Routing and Flow The channel in question is a small headwater tributary to the east fork of Maplewood Creek. It is shown on the City of Renton's draft Water Class Map (Figure 2) as the east-west running Class 4 channel between 142 nd Avenue SE and 144th Avenue SE. Class 4 channels are non-fish-bearing streams with seasonal flow. The stream enters the property via a 24-inch concrete storm drain pipe with flows coming from a pipe to the east and a second pipe to the north. To the east, a small channel on the east side of 144th Avenue SE continues up a gradual slope through private property. A combination of lawn, vegetable, and flower gardens are planted up to the edge of the channel. To the north the storm drain is buried under 144th Avenue SE to the intersection of SE 132 nd Street where it is fed by other buried connections. After being discharged onto the property from the concrete pipe near 144 th Avenue SE, the channel runs in a westerly direction approximately 675 feet across open pasture. At the west edge of the property flow drops into a roadside ditch which runs to the south along 142 nd Avenue SE. At the intersection of SE 136th Street, flow merges with roadside drainage from SE 136 th Street and the combined drainage passes through a culvert south under SE 136 th Street to the East Fork of Maplewood Creek. Maplewood Creek downstream of the site is a more natural stream channel with relatively good riparian buffers along both banks. The channels were surveyed on June 10,2005. No water was observed in the eastern channel upstream of the site and north of l44th Avenue SE. All flow entering the property (about 30 gallons per minutes or 0.07 cubic feet per second) came from the storm drain connection to the north. Water remained as surface flow across the property and for a short distance after leaving the west edge of the property. However, it rapidly disappeared into the quarry spall substrate in the ditch along 142 nd Avenue SE and no water was observed in the channel as it approached the SE I 36th Street intersection. There was flow in the East Fork of Maplewood Creek. 3.2 Stream Classification The channel is shown on the City of Renton's draft Water Class Map (Figure 2) as a Class 4 water. Class 4 waters are non-salmonid-bearing intermittent waters during years of normal rainfall. The City's classification is consistent with actual conditions found on the ground. March 22, 2006 Connr:r Homes/Stream Mitigalion Plan 032206.doc CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, LlVC Page 2 Shy Creek Proje ct Renton, Washington NE 4H " SE 1,/ PI SE 2nd PI NE 4t h SI NE 2nd 51 - SE l39 th PI '" t> ~ II -< .. i)I ~ ~ Sf 142M St hi fW ~ ~ Figure 2. Details from City of Renton Water Class Map 3 .3 Physical Condition Stream Mitigation Plan LE GEND: Class I Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Pipcd or cul vc rt cd (dots) The on-site channel has been heavily influenced by its location in an active pasture. Stream banks have been trampled , all woody debris removed, and the normal pool-riffle series that would be expected for this gradient has been eliminated. Years of undetained road and development related runoff from upstream have also impacted natural habitat quality. The channel exhibits an abnormally wide and shallow profile typical of disturbed channels. The channel at the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) ranges from 3 to 10 feet in width with an average of about 5 feet. The maximum observed depth was only a few inches. Substrates varied by channel gradient but were generally dominated by silt and organic matter. A lesser proportion of sand was typically observed. In some of the steeper areas to the west , substrate was dominated by cobble and gravel. Pasture grasses grow throughout the streanl channel in some areas (Figure 3). The off-site stream channel along 1421ld Avenue SE is a manmade ditch constructed to move runoff quickly downslope to the East Fork of Maplewood Creek. The ditch has steep dirt banks and a quarry spall anMor dirt lined bed. No natural habitat features (e.g. pools, woody debris, gravel , etc.) exist. All flow (30 gpm) entering the channel on the date surveyed infiltrated into the coarse substrate. Marc h 22, 2006 Conner Ho mes/Stream Mitigotio n Plan OJ2206.doc CEDAROCK CONSULTA N l S , INC Pa ge 3 Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington 3.4 Vegetative Cover Stream Mitigation Plan The stream channel on-site runs through a grassy pasture for almost its entire length (Figure 3). Vegetative stream cover consists almost entirely of maintained or grazed pasture grasses. The banks have been trampled and grazed for years so no shrubs have become established. A few dozen native trees are found within 100 feet of the channel. Douglas fir, western red cedar, alder, cottonwood, and quaking aspen exist individually and in small groups. The off-site stream channel along l42nd Avenue SE is buried under a dense thicket of Himalayan blackberry, young trees, and reed canarygrass (Figure 4). A few young alder and cottonwood extend above the blackberry. No mature trees were observed along this reach. 3.5 Ecological Functions Non fish-bearing stream channels and their riparian buffers are important to the contribution of clean, cool, and productive flows to fish habitat downstream as well as providing wildlife habitat and migration corridors. Primary ecological functions provided by Class 4 stream channels and their buffers are described below along with a description of existing conditions for each function. Water Quality Vegetation adjacent to streams can improve water quality by filtering pollutants, removing nutrients, and preventing sediment introduction. Buffers of approximately 100 feet are normally required to preserve buffer function where natural routing of water through buffers is preserved. However, source control and water quality best management practices are recognized as more important for urban settings where stormwater runoff is not delivered to the buffer and much narrower buffers provide equivalent water quality protection in these conditions. The water quality function of the existing on-site buffer is poor. Livestock currently deposit waste in and around the stream channel although the grass slopes adjacent to the channel help remove both biological and chemical contaminants from upslope runoff. The vegetated slopes function· to disperse flow and help settle particulates while promoting some infiltration. The ditch along l42nd Avenue SE is dominated by a very dense layer of Himalayan blackberry and a few trees to the detriment of the natural groundcovers which normally help intercept, disperse, and uptake surface water flows. This is likely due to the poor and compacted soils used to create the ditch. As a result, surface water runs directly across the narrow riparian buffer and receives very little natural treatment. March 22, 2006 Conner Homes/Stream Mitigation Pian 032206.doc CEDAROCK CONSULTANV,', INC Page 4 Shy Creek Pr oject Rent o n, Washinston Stream Mitigation Plan Figure 3. On-site stream channel existing condition. Small areas oflonger grass to the left and right of the channel define the on-site wetland. Figure 4. Stream channel (roadside ditch) existing condition along l42nd Avenue SE . March 22, 2006 CEDAHO CK CONSUL TANTS. INC. Con ner !/om u lSt ream Mitigallon Plan 032206.do c Page 5 Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington Food Stream Mitigation Plan Class 4 streams are very important to stream productivity being the primary source of leaf litter and insects delivered to fish habitat downstream. Overhanging vegetation contributes leaves, vegetative litter, and small woody debris directly to the channel. This material forms the source of food for aquatic invertebrates, which are in turn eaten by fish. Terrestrial insects, another food source, also utilize riparian vegetation as habitat. The majority of material comes from directly over the stream. Fuoction diminishes rapidly after about 25 feet from channels edge though some benefit is still realized up to about 50 feet away. The grass overhanging the on-site stream channel and occasional tree provide only an insignificant source of organic material and very poor habitat for terrestrial insects. The site under existing conditions is a poor primary source of nutrients and food and contributes little to the aquatic food chain. The majority of vegetation in the ditch along 142 nd Avenue SE is non-native. Non-native species are normally not as good at providing the nutrients, organic material, and insect matter as native plant species that evolved together with regional fish populations. Microclimate Riparian vegetation protects streams from climate changes caused by widespread development away from the stream, including soil and air temperature, humidity, and wind. There is no direct link between microclimate and the condition of salmonid habitat, however, it has been suggested that microclimate needs protection to maintain desirable assemblages of plants and animal species, including insects, beneficial to fish. It is estimated that a buffer between approximately 58 and 345 feet in the Renton area is necessary to entirely preserve natural mature forest riparian microclimates. The lack of any significant vegetation adjacent to either channel provides almost no microclimate function under existing conditions. Temperature & Shade Class 4 streams are intermittent and typically don't contain flow during the dry summer months when high water temperature issues are a concern. However, high groundwater levels or early fall rains may on occasion extend streamflow into the warm season and riparian buffers help prevent adverse effects to the temperature of water being contributed to summer rearing habitat downstream. Few studies have addressed temperature and shade requirements for intermittent stream channels. Under existing conditions, the large majority of the stream channel across the site contains very little shade producing vegetation. The majority of the channel bed is directly exposed to solar heating (Figure 3). A few large trees along the south side of the channel shade small portions of the bed. March 22, 2006 Conner Homes/Stream Mitigation Plan 032206.doc CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC Page 6 Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington Stream Mitigation Plan The ditch along 142nd Avenue SE is covered with relatively dense vegetation which provides good shading of the channel where it exists. Human Access Control One function of buffers in populated watersheds can be reducing the direct encroachment of humans including refuse dumping, trampling of vegetation, bank erosion, and noise. Buffers generally function most effectively when the adjacent land use consists of low intensity development; when buffer areas are greater than 50 feet wide and planted with high quality mixed species of native vegetation; and where there was a high degree of resident education on the value of buffers. The grassy slopes adjacent to the on-site stream provides no control of either human or livestock access to the channel. The dense blackberry overhanging the ditch along l42nd Avenue SE affords good access control. Large Woody Debris Large woody debris (L WD) consists of downed tree stems and branches and is a functionally important structural component of stream channels in the Pacific Northwest. In non-fish-bearing stream channels such as on this project site, L WD acts as a surface for biological activity which contributes to the productivity of a stream system. In a mature coniferous forest, the majority (70 to 90 percent) ofLWD in a stream comes from within 50 feet of the stream. For Class 4 streams in relatively flat areas such as the project site, most L WD would come from a closer distance due to the lack of landslide induced recruitment. The existing channel contains no LWD either on-or off-site. A few scattered trees may offer a minimal future opportunity for recruitment but most are young and/or deciduous which precludes the higher function available from coniferous debris and stems. Channel Migration Channel migration zones are typically associated with larger mainstem channels; not low gradient headwaters streams and roadside ditches as are found on the project site. Bank Stability Roots from vegetation growing along the streambank help stabilize soils and reduce erosion. Root strength benefits are normally low beyond 40 feet from the channel. The existing grass lined banks adjacent to both sides of the on-site channel have very poor bank stability. Frequent erosion is commonly observed, though much of it has to do with animal grazing through the channel. The off-site channel has been rip-rapped with rock so bank stability is not generally an issue. March 22, 2006 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS,/NC. Conner Homes/Stream Mitigation Plan 032206.doc Page 7 Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington Wildlife Habitat Stream Mitigation Plan The grassy slopes adjacent to the on-site stream provides little to no wildlife habitat. The few trees near the creek provide perching and nesting habitat for native and neo-tropical migrant birds. The narrow strip of exotic vegetation along the l42nd Avenue SE ditch provides minimal wildlife habitat. 3.6 Fish Use Neither the on-site stream channel nor the off-site ditch adjacent to 142nd Avenue SE are known to have ever contained fish. This intermittently flowing stream reach is typical of small headwater tributaries in the Pacific Northwest whose primary purpose is the supply and transport of cool productive water to fish habitat downstream. The nearest reported fish use of Maplewood Creek is approximately 3,000 feet downstream in the lower Maplewood Creek canyon (Kerwin 2001, WDFW 2005). 3.7 Wildlife Use Wildlife use documented during the stream survey consisted solely of a variety of small passerine birds including crows, finches, juncos, and swallows which inhabit the trees. Use of the area by other suburban species including opossums, raccoons, squirrels and possibly coyote is also likely. Reptiles and amphibians may be present near the creek but the absence of cover such as downed logs, and frequent livestock trampling likely limits the presence to relatively low levels. 4.0 RESOURCE AND FUNCTIONAL VALUES TO BE RESTORED, CREATED,ORENHANCED Aquatic and wildlife habitat on the site consist of a Class 4 stream, its riparian buffer, and an associated Class 3 wetland. All three features have been heavily impacted by their existing use as livestock grazing area and roadside ditch. As such, this mitigation plan focuses on restoring function to a degraded area. Aquatic functions described in Section 3.5 are targeted for enhancement with the primary purpose of protecting and enhancing water quality delivered to downstream fisheries resources in Maplewood Creek and the Cedar River. A secondary benefit to small wildlife species including birds, amphibians, rodent, and small mammals will occur with the enhanced riparian corridor. The existing stream channel consists of a poorly defined grass lined swale in the upper third (Figure 3), a well defined graveled channel in the middle, and a rip-rap lined roadside ditch in the lower third (Figure 4). The upper and middle portions are accessed by livestock and have virtually no riparian vegetation other than grass and a few scattered trees. A dense vegetative cover dominated by exotic species covers the roadside ditch. The proposed riparian planting plan March 22. 2006 Conner Hames/Stream Mitigation Plan 032206.dnc CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS. INC Page 8 Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington Stream Mitigation Plan will improve water quality during the winter by removing livestock access, riparian productivity, microclimate, temperature and shade, human access control, woody debris, migration, bank stability,wildlife habitat. The mitigation plan-set is provided in Appendix 2. 4.1 Habitat Improvement Opportunity Key to this impacts analysis is the existing degraded condition of both the on-site channel and the ditch adjacent to 142 nd A venue SE. If the development was completed utilizing standard MR buffers of 35 feet, there would be no proposal to enhance riparian vegetation. While some trees would remain, the grassy pasture land would probably naturally convert to a mixture of sun and moisture loving species such as Himalayan blackberry, reed canarygrass, and Japanese knotweed consistent with areas of unmanaged stream corridor and emergent wetland upstream and downstream of the site. These aggressive non-native species out-compete native plants and provide relatively little of the natural function or habitat value required by aquatic and terrestrial animals. The proposed action will provide a smaller area of buffer adjacent to the creek but the area will have a much higher habitat quality than under both existing conditions and use of standard buffers. 4.2 Function and Value Comparison This section provides a comparison of riparian buffer functions and values under a standard 35- foot unimproved condition versus a 25-foot enhanced condition (Appendix 2). Function and value determinations are based on best available science as described in A.C. Kindig & Co and Cedarock Consultants, Inc. (2003). Water Quality The project will utilize source control and water quality best management practices to collect and treat surface water runoff before it is discharged to the stream. Stormwater runoff would not be delivered to the buffer in the future. Removal of the existing livestock would eliminate a source of fecal coliform and nitrogen contamination and reduce the existing fine sediment contribution made when large animals trample the banks and walk through the creek. Food The proposed enhanced buffer is expected to provide a significantly better nutrient source than under existing conditions due primarily to the use of native species and the more diverse source of nutrients this provides. A 70-foot wide swath of blackberry or Japanese knotweed such as would be expected under the unmanaged standard buffer would provide little of the year-round organic nutrient contribution or supply of woody debris in comparison to a native species buffer. In addition, the insect population and benthic invertebrate community would be different than native fish evolved to expect. Because most organic material falls vertically or is carried a short distance by wind, the region providing the greatest nutrient benefit to the aquatic environment is directly over and as near as possible to the channel. The enhanced buffer captures the most important nutrient sources and improves functionality. March 22, 2006 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC. Conner Homes/Stream Mitigation Plan 032206.doc Page 9 Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington Microclimate Stream Mitigation Plan Microclimate is a big picture climate control issue extending for up to many hundreds of feet from the channel. Neither the 35-foot standard buffer nor the 25-foot enhanced buffer for Class 4 streams are expected to have much effect on this habitat variable. Either buffer would be better than the existing turf. Temperature and Shade With intermittent stream channels, temperature and shade are not normally significant issues for controlling water quality due to the absence of flow during the warm season. Both the 35-foot standard buffer and the 25-foot enhanced buffer should provide adequate and similar temperature control for the Class 4 stream. Human Access Control The proposed buffer would provide a moderately dense, year-round buffer significantly better than the existing turf grass in keeping humans out of the creek. With appropriate signage and/or fencing, this arrangement would significantly reduce access to the creek. It is difficult to predict if the proposed or standard buffer would have a higher value in controlling human access to the channel. While wider buffers are generally better all other things being equal, a dense reed-canarygrass or Japanese knotweed stand only precludes people during the growing season. During the rest of the year the channel would be exposed, A dense blackberry stand would preclude human access year-round. The proposed buffer would provide year-round protection of moderate quality. Large Woody Debris Large woody debris contribution is not a significant function of urban Class 4 streams due to the liability of allowing large old growth trees to fall randomly near homes, and the inability of small urban streams to transport L WD to fish-bearing waters. However, smaller woody debris can function as substrate for macroinvertebrates and as an organic nutrient source. Under the proposed enhanced buffer, L WD would be stocked into the riparian buffer and stream channel as an immediate benefit. Both coniferous and deciduous trees would be planted as future sources of organic debris. Neither of these benefits would occur under the standard buffer option. The extra 10-feet of unimproved buffer might in the future provide an additional source of nutrients though the tendency for these areas is for exotic species to colonize to the exclusion of native trees and shrubs. Channel Migration Channel migration zones are not associated with low gradient headwaters streams and roadside ditches as are found on the project site. The proposed buffer would provide equivalent channel migration value to the standard buffer. March 22, 1006 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS. INC. Conner Homes/Stream Mitigation Plan 032}06.dflC Page 10 , Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington Bank Stability Stream Mitigation Plan Bank stability would be significantly improved with proposed removal of the livestock and planting adjacent to the channel. The 35-foot wide standard buffers would provide good quality bank stability assuming root strength from perennial shrubs and trees became established. As noted previously, it is reasonable to assume that this wouldn't happen due to the various species of aggressive exotic plants which normally colonize unmanaged riparian stands. With the types of plants proposed for the enhanced buffer arrangement, and the low gradient, low energy channel, root strength in the proposed 25-foot buffer is expected to be superior to the standard alternative. Wildlife Habitat Wildlife habitat would improve significantly under the proposed condition over the turf grass now occupying the site. Native plantings in a multi-story canopy would provide a much higher wildlife habitat value than in a less diverse setting dominated by exotic species. Native species provide superior feeding, roosting, and nesting opportunities for birds The resultant woody debris and herbivorous ground cover is better for amphibians, reptiles, and small rodents. While the standard buffer would be slightly wider and might benefit some species purely based on the larger size, it is expected that a more diverse, native-species dominated buffer would provide an overall net benefit to wildlife. Wetland The existing wetland counts only a limited quantity of flood attenuation as an environmental benefit. The trampled pasture grass along the stream's edge has no wildlife or water quality benefit under existing conditions. Under developed conditions, the new wetland would be the same size and a few hundred feet downstream so attenuation characteristics would be unchanged. Livestock would be eliminated and the wetland would be planted with herbs, shrubs, and fringing trees to enhance wildlife value. Water quality would also benefit from increased shade and nutrient uptake provided by the vegetation. Overall, the functional quality of the wetland would be enhanced. 4.3 Summary Value for most habitat functions under the proposed buffer arrangement is expected to be equal to or greater than for a buffer under the standard code requirement. This is primarily due to the low existing value of the buffer, proposed planting enhancements, proposed woody debris supplementation, and small size of the subject stream channel. 5.0 COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Permits are required from the WDFW, Ecology, and Army Corps of Engineers to allow work within the stream channel. Application for a Section 404 permit was filed with the Army Corps on February 7, 2006. The applicant met on-site with WDFW on September 4, 2003 to discuss March 22, 2006 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC. Conner Homes/Stream MItigatIOn Plan 032206.doc Page 11 Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington Stream Mitigation Plan options for the creek channel. WDFW subsequently provided a letter detailing their recommendations for the channel (Appendix 3). While WDFW has tentatively approved realignment of the entire channel. the applicant has instead chosen to maintain the existing alignment except where channel movement is required to widen 142 nd Avenue. An application will be filed with WDFW for Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) once major design details have been agreed to with the City. An HPA is required for the three new culverts, wetland filling, and realignment of the roadside ditch. 6.0 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE Construction is expected to begin during the spring of 2006 with demolition of existing structures, clearing and grubbing. Grading will take place during the summer followed by utility and infrastructure improvements. Final plat improvements should be complete within six months. Final home build-out should be complete within 36 months. 7.0 SITE PROTECTION AND MAINTENANCE The stream buffers and wetland will be monitored and maintained for the first three years after construction (see Section 9.0). Maintenance will include replacement of dead and dying plants, removal of exotic plant species, and trash collection. 8.0 ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS The goal for the Stream Mitigation Plan is to provide a viable riparian plant community adjacent to the Maplewood Creek tributary. Goals and objectives are to provide increased functions and values to the riparian stream corridor as described in Section 4.0. More specific goals include: • Create 1,733 square feet of vegetated wetland meeting wetland vegetation and hydrology criteria. • Maintain pre-development hydrology to the wetland, • Remove invasive and exotic plants from the mitigation area and replace with native species. Monitoring will be conducted for the purpose of ensuring the plant community as designed and planted complies with these objectives. Performance standards are described in Section 9.0. March 22. 2006 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC. Conner Homes/Stream Mitlgation Plan 032206.doc Page 12 • Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington 9.1 Sampling Methodology Stream Mitigation Plan 9.0 MONITORING The newly created wetland will be monitored six times over a thtee year period, once in the early growing season to monitor wetland hydrology, and once in the summer to monitor plant survival. Monitoring will be conducted using the techniques and procedures described below to quantify the survival, relative health and growth of plant material as well as the successful creation of an area meeting wetland vegetation and hydrology criteria, An annual monitoring report submitted following each years monitoring visits will describe and quantify the status of the mitigation at that time. Hydrology Wetland hydrology will be monitored using two (2) combination staff/crest gauges located within the restoration area. Surface water level or b'found water saturation depths will be measured at these two stations to determine if wetland hydrology has been successfully attained. As is noted in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987), wetland hydrology is defined as inundation or soil saturation (usually within 12" of the surface) during the growing season. The growing season for this area is generally defined as the period between the middle of March and the middle of November. However, plant growth often occurs earlier in the year and sound professional judgment will be needed to determine when the growing season is taking place at the site. Wetland hydrology will be considered successfully created if wetland hydrology is observed inundating or saturating the soil within 12 inches of the surface during the growing season. Readings will be made early in the growing season (approximately March 15) to determine if wetland hydrology is present. Vegetation The vegetation monitoring consists of inspection of the planted material to determine the health and vigor of the installation. All the planted material in the wetland and buffer will be inspected during each monitoring visit to determine the level of survival of the installation. 9.2 Standards Of Success • Evaluation of the success of the mitigation project will be based upon an 80 percent survival for all planted woody vegetation at the end of year 3. • Not more than 10 percent cover of non-native invasive species within mitigation area after year 3. • The wetland mitigation project will create 1,733sf of wetland meeting at least the vegetation and hydrology criteria for a wetland as described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987). March 22, 2006 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC. Conner Homes/Stream MitigatIOn Plan 032206.doc Page 13 Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington Stream Mitigation Plan • Volunteer native, non-invasive species will be included as acceptable components of the mitigation. 10.0 CONTINGENCY PLAN A contingency plan would be implemented if necessary. Contingency plans would be developed based on the specific failure to meet success standards described in Section 9.2 of this plan. Contingency plans could include additional plant installation, erosion control, modifications to hydrology, and plant substitutions including type, size, and location. If the monitoring results indicate that any of the performance standards are not being met, it may be necessary to implement all or part of the contingency plan. Careful attention to maintenance is essential in ensuring that problems do not arise. Should any of the site fail to meet the success criteria, a contingency plan will be developed and implemented with the City approval. Such plans are prepared on a case-by-case basis to reflect the failed mitigation characteristics. Contingency/maintenance activities may include: • Replacing all plants lost to vandalism, drought, or disease, as necessary. • Replacing any plant species with a 20 percent or greater mortality rate with the same species or similar species approved by the City Biologist. • Irrigating the wetland area only as necessary during dry weather if plants appear to be too dry, with a minimal quantity of water. • Reseeding wetland and buffer areas with an approved grass mixture as necessary if erosion/sedimentation occurs. • Removing all trash or undesirable debris from the wetland and buffer areas as necessary. March 22, 2006 Cooner Homes/Stream MitJgation Pla1l 032206.doc CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS. INC Page 14 Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington Stream Mitigation Plan 11.0 COST ESTIMATE Table I Cost Estimate Worksheet Items lJnit Cost linits Total Trees 269 $25/ ea $6,725 Shrubs 733 $15/ ea $10,995 Seed 6 $115 lib $690 LWD 130 $250/ ea $32,500 Sedges and rush 200 $2/ ea $400 Monitoring 3 $2,000 / year $6,000 Base Cost-$57,310 30% Contingency -$17,193 Total Cost-$74,503 12.0 COMPLIANCE WITH THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE RMC 4-3-050 L(3)(c)(ii) provides criteria for approval of a Stream Mitigation Plan. This section discusses how this plan meets those requirements. 12.1 Mitigation Location Mitigation for all proposed environmental impacts shall take place on-site as recommended as the preferred mitigation location under the RMC. 12.2 Mitigation Type Mitigation shall consist of the highest preference option available to the applicant under subsection L3c(ii)(b). This consists of improving biological functions of the on-site stream buffer. There are no options to daylight streams or remove manmade salmonid migration barriers within or near the project site. As demonstrated in Section 4.2 of this report, mitigation provides for equivalent or greater biological functions of the watercourse. 12.3 Contiguous Corridors All mitigation has been located to preserve or achieve contiguous riparian and wildlife corridors to the greatest extent practicable throughout the project site. All proposed mitigation consists of one nearly contiguous habitat corridor through the center of the project. The mitigation follows the existing stream channel and is only interupted at the two required stream crossings. March 22, 2006 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC. Conner HomeslStream Mitigation Plan 032206.doc Page 15 Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington 12.4 Non-Indigenous Species Stream Mitigation Plan No non-indigenous plant, wildlife, or fish species shall be introduced into the riparian corridor. All species to be utilized for riparian planting were native species selected to provide a combination of moderate to high stream protection and wildlife function. 12.5 Equivalent or Greater Biological Functions Existing and proposed ecological functions of on-site riparian habitat is discussed in the Supplemental Stream Study prepared for this project (Cedarock 2006) and summarized in Section 4.2 of this report. Compliance with best available science is discussed in Section 13.0. A qualitative evaluation of functions and values found a net gain in riparian habitat quality. 12.6 Minimum Mitigation Plan Performance Standards RMC 4-3-050 F8 contains additional mitigation requirements which the applicant must meet. The applicant shall: • Demonstrate sufficient scientific expertise, the supervisory capability, and the financial resources to carry out the mitigation project. To this end the applicant has contracted with Cedarock Consultants to provide stream mitigation analysis and design, and with Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. to provide wetland analysis and design. Both firms have extensive experience designing, supervising construction, and monitoring results of mitigation projects. Resumes of key personnel are provided in Appendix 4. The applicant, Conner Homes, has been in business in the Puget Sound since 1959 and has completed nearly 4,000 homes. • Demonstrate the capability for monitoring the site and to make corrections during the monitoring period if the mitigation project fails to meet projected goals. Mitigation monitoring for this project is relatively simple. The Class 4 stream does not require any instream work and the channel is non-fish-bearing. All corrections will consist of minor repairs to infrastructure near the creek (fences, signs, etc.) and replacement of dead and dying plants as necessary. • Protect and manage, or provide for the protection and management, of the mitigation area to avoid further development or degradation and to provide for long-term persistence of the mitigation area. As required under City code, the mitigation area will be permanently designated a Native Growth Protection Area. This designation is called out on the development plans submitted to the City (See Appendix 1). • Provide for project monitoring and allow City inspections. The applicant will contract with a consultant to monitor all mitigation areas. Permission for City inspections is not needed as the area will be public property readily accessed on public roads. • Avoid mitigation proposals that would result in additional future mitigation or regulatory requirements for adjacent properties, unless it is a result of a code requirement. or no other option is feasible or practical. The proposed mitigation does not move the location of any natural feature towards adjacent properties. Thus no off-site property owners will be affected. March 22, 2006 Conner Homes/Stream MitJgatiorJ plan 032206.doc CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS. INC Page 16 ,,. Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington Stream Mitigation Plan • For on-site or off-site mitigation proposals, abutting or adjacent property owners shall be notified when wetland creation or restoration, stream relocation, critical area buffer increases, flood hazard mitigation, habitat conservation mitigation, or geologic hazard mitigation have the potential to considerably decrease the development potential of abutting or adjacent properties. For example, if a created wetland on a property would now result in a wetland buffer intruding onto a neighboring property, the neighboring property owner would be notified, No abutting or adjacent property owners will be affected in any way by the proposed mitigation plan for this project. 12.7 Based on Best Available Science Compliance with best available science is described in Section 13.0. 13.0 COMPLIANCE WITH BEST AVAILABLE SCIENCE 13.1 Review of the Best Available Science Supporting the Proposed Request The buffer widths proposed for the on-site tributary are both wider and better vegetated than under existing conditions. Functions and values of both instream and riparian habitat will be improved over existing conditions based on wider buffers, native species plantings, and livestock removal. A summary of proposed buffer functions in comparison to standard buffers is provided in Table 2, Riparian buffers are generally recognized as having four major elements necessary to protect the aquatic environment: • Maintenance of stream baseflows; • Maintenance of water quality; • Contribution to in-stream structural diversity; and • Contribution of biotic input including insects and organic matter. Best Available Science (BAS) is unanimous in its recognition that wider buffers provide increasing value to aquatic habitat (Pollock and Kennard 1998). Since the relationship between buffer width and buffer function is exponential, the incremental functional benefits of increasing buffer width decreases as buffers become wider. Under proposed conditions for the creek, buffers will range from a minimum of 25 feet to a maximum of about 70 feet (horizontal distance). Because these buffers will be wider than under current conditions, and because the conditions within the buffers will be improved over existing conditions, the proposed buffers are consistent with the RMC requirement to utilize BAS to improve water quality, fish, and wildlife habitat. As described below using BAS, the proposed buffers will create a functional stream channel fully capable of protecting the major elements described above, March 22, 2006 Conn.er Homes/SJream MitigaJion Plan ()32206.doc CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC Page 17 Shy Creek Project Renton. Washington __ §tream Mitigation Plan Table 2 Riparian Habitat Functions and Values, Comparison of Standard versus Proposed Buffers Water Low to High Lack of native vegetation a minus. Future Narrower width a minus. Native vegetation is a Quality development will not discharge to buffer so plus. Future development will not discharge to width not a major issue. buffer so width not a major issue. Food High Beneficialleaflitter and small organic debris Buffer optimized with a diverse mix of native would be scarce in unmanaged buffer species including trees. High habitat value near dominated by non-native species creek. Microclimate Moderate Neither buffer expected to have much effect on Neither buffer expected to have much effect on microclimate. microclimate. Temperature Low to none Not a significant issue for intermittent Class 4 Not a significant issue for intermittent Class 4 & Shade streams streams Human Moderate to High Wider buffer with unpredictable value. Could Narrower buffer with dense year-round plant Access be low value intermittent plants or high value coverage. Predictable. Fencing and signage Control blackberry. could help. Large Low Unlikely to have any significant future L WD Stocked with L WD plus planting that will Woody source due to dominance by non-native plants. contribute some minor woody debris Debris Channel Low to none Low grade Class 4 streams unlikely to migrate. Low grade Class 4 streams unlikely to migrate. Migration Little if any significant root development. Root strength provide by future trees. Bank High Exotic species dominated riparian corridor. Root strength provided by future trees and Stability Banks unprotected by significant roots. large shrubs. Wildlife Not Rated More area but relatively low value as bird, Native plantings in a dense multi-story canopy Habitat amphibian, reptile, and rodent habitat. would provide high wildlife habitat value. Adapted from: AC. Kindig & Co and Cedarock Consultants, Inc. 2003. March 22. 2006 Conner Homes/Stream MitlgatJOn. Plan. 032206.doc CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS. INC Page 18 EQuivalent function under both buffers Prol1osed action will have highest value EQuivalent function under both buffers Eguivalent function under both buffers Unpredictable. Elimination of livestock access is a significant benefit Proposed action will likely have highest value EQuivalent function under both buffers Pro!1Qsed action will have highest value Prol1osed action will have highest value Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington Stream Baseflow Stream Mitigation Plan The proposed buffers will have little effect on stream baseflow because baseflow conditions are generally controlled by conditions at the watershed level, and not within the immediate buffer zone of streams (Ecology 2005)1. Impacts to Summer Basejlows Summer baseflow in Johnson Creek is limited by the small size of the basin upslope of the project location and lack of year-round springs. Because the creek sources naturally dry up each year, the on-site buffers have no effect on baseflow conditions. Impacts to Winter Basejlows and Peak Flows Winter flows and water elevations in the creek are primarily a result of runoff from the upper basin, shallow spring flow discharge, and a smaller contribution from the relatively impervious field turf found on the site. The existing wetland on the site provides a minor amount of available storage area. The project would influence winter flows by eliminating direct discharge from the pasture and by increasing channel roughness (with native plantings). The existing pasture wetland would be recreated just downstream of the existing site so the overall storage area would remain unchanged. Runoff from new impervious surface in the development would be captured and detained to City BMP specifications before discharge. Water Oualitv Water quality as it relates to aquatic habitat consists of various components including chemistry (pH, D.O., metals, etc.) and temperature (the beneficial dissolved and particulate organic nutrients that are also a component of water quality are discussed in the Biotic Input section). Water Chemistry Buffer widths ranging from 30 to 100 feet are described in the literature as satisfactory for removing the majority of sediment and pollutants from surface water (summarized in Knutson and Naef 1997). However, under the proposed conditions, on-site natural pathways to the stream will be eliminated by changing the hydrologic flow paths to a piped drainage systems that will bypass the riparian area. Much of the natural buffer functions for hydrologic and water quality functions (peak flow attenuation, base flow releases, and water quality treatment) will be removed from riparian buffer control by the storm drain system. Storm water detention and water quality treatment requirements are regulated for new development and redevelopment within the City without reliance on riparian buffer function. Temperature and Shade Stream buffers provide shade and absorb solar radiation that would otherwise reach streams and increase water temperatures. For these reasons, shade provided by riparian buffers is important to I See Wetlands in Washington State (Ecology 2005), page 3-51. The explanation as to why wetlands generally do not support baseflow to streams is generally applicable to the functions of stream buffers. While groundwater may be discharged to a stream within its riparian buffers, the source of this water is not within the buffer itself; rather, it is a function of the entire groundwater system of the watershed. March 22. 2006 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC. Conner Homes/Stream Mitigation Plan 032206.doc Page 19 Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington Stream Mitigation Plan maintaining water temperatures that are favorable for salmonids. Research on the effects of shade on stream water temperatures shows a considerable amount of variability based on topographic elevation, adjacent land uses, vegetation type, and numerous other factors (Pollack and Kennard 1998). Because the primary temperature concern occurs during the warmer summer and early fall season, and the on-site stream channel is dry during this period, shade is less of a concern on this site than for streams with perennial flow. However, the proposed buffer will completely cover the stream channel with vegetation and will significantly moderate temperatures as required for many wildlife species. Instream Structural Diversity In-stream structural diversity is provided by large pieces of wood falling into the creek. Downed tree stems and branches are a functionally important structural component of stream channels in the Pacific Northwest. Large woody debris (L WD) consists of downed tree stems and branches and is a functionally important structural component of stream channels in the Pacific Nortbwest (Bisson et al. 1987, Beschta et al. 1987, Sullivan et al. 1987, Bilby and Ward 1991, Fetherston et al. 1995, Naiman and Beechie 1992). Because the affected stream channel is non-fish-bearing, L WD contribution is significantly less important than for a creek containing a salrnonid population. Also, the abundance of culverts downstream precludes recruitment from this site to downstream fish habitat. This is typical for an urban setting. L WD does provide amphibian habitat and helps trap organic particles which increases primary productivity and contributes food to fish downstream. To help speed L WD accumulation in the channel the project has proposed pre-loading the channel with L WD at a rate of approximately 2 pieces per channel width. This loading rate is based upon BAS that showed a similar rate for undisturbed old growth forests (Bilby and Ward 1989, Bilby and Ward 1991). These actions will greatly improve habitat quality over existing conditions. Biotic Input Vegetation and insects falling into the creek form an important component of the aquatic ecosystem food chain, especially in smaller stream channels. The majority of material comes from directly over, or within a very short distance of the stream. FEMAT (1993) suggests most leaf material is contributed by trees located within approximately 50 feet of the channel edge. Under existing conditions there is virtually no biotic input to the creek. With an average future riparian buffer width of slightly more than 25 feet, the contribution of vegetative litter and insect population abundance should range from between about 50 to 70 percent of the natural potential, much greater than under existing conditions. Noise and Visual Disturbance Riparian buffers protect sensitive areas from direct human impact by limiting easy access to the stream and by blocking the transmittal of human and mechanical noise. Riparian buffers provide visual separation between streams and the developed environment, blocking glare and human movement from fish species (Young 1989). Buffers function most effectively when the adjacent land use consists of low intensity development; when buffer areas were greater than 50 feet wide, and planted with high quality mixed species of native vegetation (Cooke 1992). Other authors March 22, 2006 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC. Conner Homes;:r;;tream Miligolion. Plan 032206.ooc Page 20 Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington Stream Mitigation Plan recommend controlled human activity within riparian buffers, such as restricting human disturbance to footpaths, or roadway crossings within 25 feet of the stream, and allowing active recreation and bike paths within 25 to 50 feet of the stream (Schueler 1995). The buffers adjacent to the on-site stream will average just over 25 feet and will be supported in many areas by fences or walls to further discourage human access. No trails will be present in the riparian corridor. The buffers will significantly discourage human use but may not eliminate it entirely, However, the project will eliminate the existing conditions where the channel is used as a watering trough and bathing area by livestock. Overall, channel disturbance is expected to decline significantly under the proposed action. 13.2 Report Authors Experience The applicant has contracted with Cedarock Consultants to provide stream analysis and mitigation design, and with Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. to provide wetland analysis and mitigation design. Both firms have extensive experience with aquatic mitigation design, construction supervision, and long term project success monitoring. Resumes of key personnel are provided in Appendix 4. Cedarock Consultants, Inc. Cedarock Consultants was established in 1997 as a professional consulting firm dealing primarily with fisheries related environmental biology. Cedarock Consultants' staff provide over 17 years of experience in assessing and mitigating land development project impacts on aquatic habitat. Carl Hadley, the senior biologist, has been the principal fisheries scientist on several dozen Environmental Impact Studies under SEPAINEPA. Much ofMr. Hadley's current practice specializes in working with clients with exposure to fisheries resources impacted by the Federal and State threatened and endangered species programs. Mr. Hadley has extensive experience with the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) having worked with the National Marine Fisheries Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on dozens of projects for clients seeking Incidental Take Permits and Biological Opinions. Mr. Hadley has also provided design, permitting, and construction oversight on many urban and rural stream enhancement, restoration, and long term monitoring programs. Cedarock staff have extensive experience helping to guide project layouts and complete permitting requirements for large land development projects. Past experience has included principal fisheries support on Weyerhaeuser's Snoqualmie Ridge Projects Phase I and II (2,080 acres), Quadrant's Redmond Ridge Project (460 acres), the Cascadia Development (4,700 acres), Suncadia Master Planned Resort (5,000 acres), and Port Blakely'S West Kitsap (440-acres) and Treemont (240-acre) developments among others. March 22,2006 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC. Conner Homes/Stream MitigatIOn Plan 032206.doc Page 21 Shy Creek Project Renton. Washington Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. Stream Mitigation Plan Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. (also known as B-12 Wetland Consulting) is an environmental consulting firm. They specialize in wetland and stream issues, mitigation design, monitoring, and environmental permits, as well as natural resource assessment and inventory. Ed Sewall, the owner, and the staff of Sewall Wetland Consulting have over 20 years of experience in wetland, stream, and wildlife ecology, environmental mitigation design, monitoring, and land use planning. As ecologists and planners they are able to support their clients from initial site investigation through design, permitting, installation, and monitoring. As members of the design team, they seek to ensure integration of sensitive area issues with design standards that will be in compliance with current regulations ofthe reviewing jurisdictions. Their expertise in developing projects includes project management, site planning, public hearing representation, and construction bid documents. Services include the delineation of wetlands and streams, development of mitigation designs for wetland, stream, creation and enhancement and wildlife habitat restoration, as well as completing wildlife habitat inventories and preparing habitat conservation plans. They also provide land use feasibility analysis, permit management, installation coordination and mitigation monitoring. Staff prepares and processes permits for wetlands and streams including local wetland and stream permits, variances, violations, shorelines, state permits including; WDFW Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) and WDOE 401 Water Quality Certification and; federal permits including; US Army Corps of Engineers (Section 404) and Biological Evaluations. 13.3 Analysis of the Likelihood of Success of the Compensation Project The proposed mitigation/compensation project is relatively uncomplicated when compared to most. There are no fish habitat or high quality wetlands involved. Mitigation consists primarily of planting native species in good quality riparian soils currently maintained as pasture. The area is watered naturally throughout most of the year. Upland plants will be selected that have adapted to the normal Pacific Northwest wet winter and dry summer seasons. The small Class 3 wetland (0.04 acres) being replaced (Figure 3) is currently functional only as a flow storage area based on its grazed state and location adjacent to the channel. The flow storage function can readily be replaced by excavating a similar area in the pasture adjacent to the stream. Only grass will be removed. The new wetland will be planted with trees and shrubs to enhance wildlife value. The mitigation site will be monitored for three years to ensure plant species selected and utilized for the project are thriving. Those that are not in satisfactory condition during this period will be replaced. After three years, all healthy plants are expected to continue growing without additional maintenance. Overall, the likelihood of success for the mitigation project is considered to be high. March 22, 2006 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC. Conner Homes/!::j'tream Mitigation Plan 032206.doc Page 22 Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington 14.0 STREAM CROSSING IMPACTS Stream Mitigation Plan The City of Renton requires stream crossings be designed to have the least possible impact on the environment (RMC 4-3-050 L8(a», Several project layout configurations were evaluated for the proposed action. They included: • No stream crossings -35-foot stream buffer, • No stream crossings -25-foot stream buffer with enhancement, • One stream crossing -25-foot stream buffer with enhancement, and • Two stream crossings -25-foot stream buffer with enhancement The standard buffer was rejected for a combination of two reasons. First, most of the significant tree stands occur outside of the stream corridor. Providing open space buffers where the mature trees are found instead of along the stream corridor allows a great number more trees to be saved. And second, the 25-foot stream buffer with enhancement option provides significantly better aquatic habitat quality than maintaining existing pasture grasses. The stream crossings allow traffic circulation to be "internalized" with fewer utility and driveway intrusions on adjacent streets. This has the benefit of allowing additional trees to be saved, has traffic and safety benefits, and greatly reduces neighborhood construction disturbance. The internal stream crossings allow a more efficient design with higher housing numbers, thus better meeting Growth Management Act density goals. Providing the stream crossings provides for a much more efficient utility design. Without stream crossings, long side sewers running through lots adjacent to the road must be installed around the stream to Hoquiam Avenue NE and back down to lots on the far side of the stream. And finally, the proposed stream crossings greatly reduce the amount of impervious surface that must be created by reducing the length of streets and alleys needed to get traffic around the creek. Additional detail describing benefits of was provided to the City in a letter from Michael L. Matheson, PE of Triad Associates dated March 21, 2006. There are two crossings proposed as part of the development. To minimize stream and buffer impacts, both crossings: • pass through the buffers and over the creek at a perpendicular angle, • are the minimum width possible under the code, • avoid moving the channel to accommodate the crossing, and • will utilize vertical walls to support the new road bed through the buffer and over the stream. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife stream crossing criteria will be met at each location. March 22, 2006 Conner Homes/Stream Mitigation Plan 032206.doc CEDAROCKCONSULTANTS, INC Page 23 Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington Stream Mitigation Plan 15.0 VEGETATION PROTECTION 15.1 Design Considerations The previous landowner valued privacy and had planted many trees along the east, west, and south property lines. Most of these trees will remain where there is no conflict with new infrastructure. Because the interior was mostly pasture, there are few existing trees in the center of the property with the exception of small scattered patches. Existing conifers ranging in sizes from 8 inches to 24 inches have been saved along the south and east property lines. These trees help provide a significant visual and physical buffer between the proposed residential development and the existing elementary school to the east, and residential development to the south. By preserving these trees along the perimeter of the property, the design more closely maintains the visual character of the existing neighborhood, while helping to integrate the new residential community with its surroundings. In addition, trees have been saved along the watercourse. These trees help preserve the natural beauty, and existing habitat along this open space corridor. They also help provide buffering between homes, and help mitigate the sense of density within the community. 15.2 Significant Tree Protection during Construction The following measures will be implemented during construction to protect significant trees on the site: • Prior to clearing, all trees to be retained shall be flagged. • Prior to grading and throughout construction, a temporary plastic net fence shall be used to identify the protected area of any significant tree designed for retention. The height of such fencing shall be adjusted according to the topographic and vegetative conditions of the site to provide clear visual delineation f the protected area. The size of the protected area around the tree shall be equal to one foot diameter for each inch of tree trunk diameter measured four feet above the ground. • At no time during construction shall the following be permitted within the significant tree protection area: (a) impervious surfaces, fill, excavation, or storage of construction materials; (b) grade level changes, except in limited circumstances where proposed improvements are determined by an arborist to be non-detrimental to the tree root systems. March 22. 2006 CEDAROCKCONSULTANTS, INC. Conner HomeS/Stream Mitigatjon Plan 032206.doc Page 24 Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington 16.0 REFERENCES Stream Mitigation Plan A.C. Kindig & Co and Cedarock Consultants, Inc. 2003. Best available science literature review and stream buffer recommendations. Consultant report prepared for the City of Renton, B-12 Wetland Consulting, Inc. 2006. Conner Homes -Shy Creek, City of Renton, wetland analysis report. January 1 S, 2006. Beschta, RL., Bilby, R.E., Brown, G.W., Holtby, L.B., and T.D. Hofstra. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In Salo, E.O and T.W, Cundy [eds.] Streamside Management: Forestry and Fishery Interactions. University of Washington, College of Forest Resources, Seattle, Washington. 471p. Bilby, R.E. and J. W. Ward. 1989. Changes in characteristics and function of woody debris with increasing size of streams in western Washington. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 118:368-378. Bilby, RE. and J. W. Ward. 1991. Characteristics and function of large woody debris in streams draining old growth, clear-cut, and second growth forests of southwestern Washington. Can. J, ofFish, Aquat. Sci., 48:1-10. Bisson, PA Bilby, R.E. Bryant, M.D. Dolloff, C.A., Grette, G.B., House, RA. Murphy, M.L., Koski,K.V. and J.R Sedell. 1987, p. 87-94. In Salo, E.O and T.W. Cundy [eds.] Streamside Management: Forestry and Fishery Interactions, University of Washington, College of Forest Resources, Seattle, Washington. 471p. Cedarock. 2006. Supplemental stream study, Shy Creek Project, Renton, Consultant report prepared for Conner Homes, Inc. Bellevue, W A. January 24, 2006. Cooke, S.S. 1992. Wetland buffers-a field evaluation of buffer effectiveness in Puget Sound. Pentec Environmental, Inc. Prepared for Washington Department of Ecology Shorelands and Coastal Zone Management Program, Olympia Washington. Ecology. 2005. Draft Freshwater Wetlands in Washington State-Volume lA: A Synthesis of the Science. Olympia, Washington. Federal Ecosystem Management Assessment Team (FEMAT) 1993. Aquatic ecosystem assessment, Volume 5. Fetherston, K.L., RJ. Naiman, and RE. Bilby. 1995. Large woody debris, physical process, and riparian forest development in montane river networks of the Pacific Northwest. Geomorphology 13:133-144. Knutson, K. L. and V. L. Naef. 1997. Management recommendations for Washington's priority habitats: riparian. Washington Department ofFish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA. 181p. Naiman, R.1., T.J. Beechie, et al. 1992. Fundamental elements of ecologically healthy watersheds in the Pacific Northwest coastal ecoregion. Pages 127-188 In RJ. Naiman, editor. Watershed management: balancing sustainability and environmental change. Springer-Verlag, New York. pp. 127-188. Pollock, M. and P.M. Kennard. 1998. A low-risk strategy for preserving riparian buffers needed to protect and restore salmonid habitat in forested watersheds of Washington State: Version 1.1. 10,000 Years Institute: Bainbridge Island, Washington. March 22, 2006 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS. INC. Conner Home.~iSlream Mitigation Pkm 032206.doc Page 25 Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington Stream Mitigation Plan Schueler, Y. 1995. Site planning for urban stream protection, Washington D.C., Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments and the Center for Watershed Protection. Sullivan, K. J. Tooley, K. Doughty, lE. Caldwell, P. Knudsen. 1990. Evaluation of prediction models and characterization of stream temperature regimes in Washington. Timber/Fish/Wildlife Report TFW-WQ3-90-006, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington. Young, MJ. 1989. Buffer delineation method for urban palustrine wetlands in the Puget Sound Region. M.S. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle. March 22, 2006 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS. INC. Conner HomeslStream MitigatIOn Plan 032206.doc Page 26 Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington APPENDIXl Stream Mitigation Plan SITE PLAN & GRADING PLAN March 22, 2006 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC Conner Homes/Stream MitigatIOn Plan 032206.doc Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington March 22, 2006 Conne,. HomeslStream M.itigation Plan 032206,doc Stream Mitigation Plan APPENDIX 2 MITIGATION PLAN CEDAROCKCONSULTANTS, INC Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington APPENDIX 3 Stream Mitigation Plan CORRESPONDENCE WITH WDFW March 22, 2006 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC Conner HomeslStream Mitigation Plan 032206.doc 1 State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Region 4 Office: 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard -Mill Creek, Washington 98012 -(425) 775-1311 September 5, 2003 Triad Associates ATTENTION: Michael L. Matheson 11814 115'h Avenue North East Kirkland, W A 98034 Dear Mr. Michael L. Matheson: OL' I ~5 Enclosed is the September 4, 2003 requested information concerning possible realigmnent of Maplewood Creek at the Alain Smith property in King County. As David Brock mentioned at the site review the Washington Department ofFish and Wildlife (WDFW) requests a zero net loss of natural function mitigation for hydraulic projects. Existing natural functions at the project site that will need to be addressed for all proposed realignments are ground water recharge, water velocity, and water quality treatment (sediment and biological). The WDFW is willing to consider all the options mentioned at the site review. Our suggestion would be to incorporate a realigned open bio-engineered creek that will meet both your needs and the zero net loss of natural function requirement. Presenting this as a creek realignment enhancement project with a natural creek bed, large woody debris, a few boulders and planted with native vegetation would be a good approach for permitting agencies and prospective homeowners. WDFW provisions for realigned channels include: The permanent new channel shall, at a minimum, be similar in length, width, depth, floodplain configuration, and gradient, as the old channel. Any gravel and/or larger rock placed in the stream channel shall be washed and rounded. The angle of the structure used to divert the stream into the new channel shall allow a smooth transition of stream flow. During construction, the new channel shall be isolated from the flowing stream by plugs at the upstream and downstream ends ofthe new channel. These plugs shall be substantial enough to prevent flood flows from entering the new channel during construction. 7- If you have any questions or would like my assistance talking with the City of Renton, please . contact me at (425) 649-4423. Sincerely, Stewart Reinbold Area Habitat Biologist WDFW sgr:AlainSmith090503 cc: David Brock WDFW Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington APPENDIX 4 Stream Mitigation Plan RESUMES FOR KEY MITIGATION DESIGN CONSULTANTS March 22, 2006 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC. Conner Homes/Stream Mitigation Pkm 032206.doc Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington Stream Mitigation Plan CARL G. HADLEY Principal Fisheries Biologist EDUCATION B.A., Ecology University 0/ California at San Diego MS. Graduate Studies, Fisheries University 0/ California at Davis PROFESSIONAL REG ISTRA TIONS Washington Department a/Natural Resources Watershed Analysis Analyst/Specialist Fisheries, Channel and Water Quality Modules Instream Flaw Physical Habitat Simulation (PHABSJM) Modeling Course NA UI and P ADJ, Open Water Scuba PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS American Fisheries Society American Fisheries Society - Bioengineering Group March 22, 2006 SUMMARY Mr. Hadley provides over 15 years of experience in assessing and mitigating land development project impacts on aquatic habitat. Mr. Hadley has been the principal fisheries scientist on several dozen Environmental Impact Studies under SEPAINEPA. Much of Mr. Hadley's current practice specializes in working with clients with exposure to fisheries resources impacted by the Federal and State threatened and endangered species programs. Past experience has included field analysis and authorship of fisheries modules for over a dozen Washington State DNR level 2 watershed analyses, a half dozen Habitat Conservation Plans for incidental take permits under Section 10 of the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), and several dozen Biological Evaluations and Biological Assessments for consultation under Section 7 of the ESA. Mr. Hadley has also provided design, permitting, and construction oversight on several dozen urban and rural stream enhancement and restoration programs. REPRESENT A TIVE PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE CRITICAL AREAS ORDINANCE DEVELOPMENT City of Renton Hired by the City of Renton to provide fisheries biology expertise to the City during development of their new Critical Areas Ordinance and Shoreline Master Program regulations. Developed best management practices for stream, lake and riparian habitat based on Best Available Science review. Worked with Department of Ecology and City to ensure new regulations met Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements. WATERCOURSE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS Skagit County Department of Public Works, Washington Provided permitting and mitigation design assistance in support of various projects designed to alleviate flooding and enhance fisheries use of farm-related watercourses in Skagit Valley. Designed stream habitat restoration features, fish passage structures, and riparian planting schemes. Prepared permit applications and supporting documents (lARPAs, Biological Assessments, etc.) as needed for local, state, and federal permits. SNOQUALMIE RIDGE PROJECT Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company Prepared fisheries sections for the Master Drainage Plan and multiple EISs. Assessed salmonid fisheries habitat in 21 drainage basins on the 2,OOO-acre development site. Evaluated project impacts on each stream and provided design input for fisheries mitigation. Conducted long-term monitoring studies to evaluate construction and land-use change impacts and develop appropriate responses based on adaptive management concepts. TREE MONT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Port Blakely Communities, Prepared fisheries sections for Environmental Impact Statement. Developed and implemented fisheries study plan to support a King County EIS and Master Development Plan. Assessed impacts to fisheries and developed appropriate miti~ation for all streams. CEDAROCK CONSULT ANI'S, INC. Conner Homes/Stream Mitigation Plan 032206.doc Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington March 22, 2006 MOUNTAINSTARISUNCADIA RESORT Trendwest Resorts Inc. Stream Mitigation Plan Authored aquatic affected environment and impacts sections for this 5,000 acre residential and resort development. Developed conceptual mitigation options for potential effects to resident and anadromous salmonids. Worked with WDFW, WDOE, NMFS, USFWS, and local Tribes to establish fisheries protection measures for new bridges, water intakes, stream crossings, plats, and golf courses. REDMOND RIDGE DEVELOPMENT Quadrant Corporation Redmond, Washington Evaluated existing conditions and developed aquatic habitat protection measures for this 460-acre land development in western Washington. Authored fisheries sections of EIS. Worked with County staff to identity fish-bearing stream reaches based on site-specific protocol. SKAGIT HIGHLAND DEVELOPMENT Mount Vernon, Washington Provided fisheries support during the EIS and ESA consultation process for this 209- acre project in the City of Mount Vernon. Conducted field reconnaissance, developed mitigation plans, prepared SEPA and BE documents, negotiated permits with city, state, and federal agencies, and testified at public hearings. CLEARVIEW WATER SUPPLY PROJECT -BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Snohomish County, Washington Prepared a biological assessment for bull trout and Chinook salmon in support of a 8.2-mile water supply pipeline near the town of Snohomish, Washington. The pipeline route crossed numerous fish-bearing streams including the Snohomish River, a major salmon bearing water course. Potential impacts to bull trout and Chinook salmon were assessed. MATS MATS QUARRY EIS AND BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Mats Mats Bay, Washington Prepared DEIS fisheries sections and a biological assessment to address potential impacts of expanded hard rock quarry operations on aquatic species. Puget Sound runs of chinook salmon, chum salmon, and bull trout were addressed in the BA. PALMER-MONROE SAND AND GRAVEL MINE Snohomish County, Washington Completed fisheries analysis of existing conditions and potential impacts of proposed gravel quarry in the Snohomish River floodplain. A fisheries restoration plan was developed for the conversion of an agricultural ditch into a stream section as mitigation for the removal of another ditch during gravel excavation. LONE STAR GRAVEL MINE -SEPA CHECKLIST Maury Island, Washington Completed fisheries technical report as part of expanded SEPA checklist. The document analyzed potential project impacts to regional fisheries resources from the applicant's proposal to reopen an historic gravel quarry on Maury Island. CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC. Conner Homes/Stream Mitigation Plan 032206.doc Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington Stream Mitigation Plan EDGAR K. SEWALL In, President, Senior Wetland Ecologist Mr. Sewall is the President and Senior Wetland Ecologist His primary responsibilities include wetland and stream determinations, delineations and preparation of reports, permits and mitigation plans for regulatory review. He oversees the design of wetland and stream mitigation, restoration, enhancement, installation, and monitoring projects. Additional responsibilities include expert testimony, wetland habitat assessment by various methodologies; natural resource inventories and habitat conservation plans. Mr. Sewall has sixteen years of experience identifying and delineating wetlands in the Northeast, South, and the Northwest United States. Mr. Sewall is a Certified Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineator, as well as being certified as a Professional Wetland Scientist by the Society of Wetland Scientists and a King County Preferred Consultant Mr. Sewall has experience in plant identification, vegetation mapping, air photograph interpretation, habitat evaluation, statistical analysis, and forest management. He also has experience in all aspects of wetland, stream and wildlife permitting, performs expert testimony at hearings and assists clients in agency coordination and permit application and approval. Recent Project Experience o o o o o o o o o Education o o o o o o o o o o o Chelan Butte -Wetland, Stream and Wildlife Assessement on 900 acre project in Chelan County, WA Cedar River Trail, King Co. WA, Wetland & stream delineation report. Snoqualmie River Trail, King Co. WA, Wetland & stream delineation & mitigation design. Soos Creek Sewer & Water District, Panther Lake Truck Line wetland delineation, report and final mitigation for 1500 sewer line through Class I wetland and buffer. Marymoore soccer fields, King County Parks, W A. Delineation, reports, permitting & mitigation design. Fred Meyer Ellensburg, delineation report, mitigation & monitoring of large stream restoration project. Creekwalk at Bellemont Crossing, Snohomish County. Delineation, report, permitting & mitigation for subdivision. Red Hawk 2, delineation & report, permitting for subdivision, Pierce County, WA. Sunset Lake Camp, Pierce County, delineation, report, permitting & mitigation for 450 acre camp Cup. Certified Professional Wetland Scientist, SWS 1995 King County Preferred Consultant 2004 Master of Science in Natural Resource Science, with concentrations in Forest and Wetland Ecology; University of Rhode Island, 1991 B.S. in Nautical Science; Marine Maritime Academy, 1982 Hydric Soil Workshop, Oregon State University June 1996 Wetland Monitoring Workshop, Edmonds, W A, 1993 National Society of Consulting Soil Scientists Annual Meeting & Hydric Soil Seminar, Portland, OR, 1993 Habitat Conference, CLE International, Seattle, W A, 1992 Grass Identification Course, Everett Community College, Everett, W A, 1992 Training Course in 1987 COE Manual, Tukwila, W A, November, 1991 Wetland Mitigation Short Course, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, 1991 March 22, 2006 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC. Conner Homes/Stream Mitigation Plan 032206.doc Shy Creek Project Renton, Washington Certifications and Affiliations Stream Mitigation Plan o Certified Professional Wetland Scientist, Society of Wetland Scientists 1995-current o Certified Wetland Delineator, USACOE, Seattle, WA, 1993-current o Certified Wetland Biologist for Pierce County, WA, 1992-current o Certified Wetland Biologist City ofTacoma, WA, 1992-current o Preferred Consultant for King County o Member, Society of Wetland Scientists, 1990-current o On Call Wetland Consultant, City of Kent, WA o On Call Wetland Consultant, City of Sammamish, WA o On Call Wetland Consultant, City of Edgewood, W A March 22, 2006 CEDAROCKCONSULTANTS, INC. COlmer Homes/Stream Mitigation Plan 032206.doc