HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-07-081_Report 01-
I'-V
u \ \
o
§l
p"
r-
L
l-
I I [
y
o
~ (~ EJ
I-J
. .---J
l..--
\l
/1
---J
S~TE
LOCATI'pN ~
~ m z
-I
0
Z
s:.
C
Z
0
=0
?!
~ V
~
0
~
\\\
d
,
o
~
.,
(')
rn o
l\ ~
:Il
Q
~Cl
~
II 1 I DJ.\ ~
\ \ \ ,,\\ ~
'> -I ~~ ~ ~ nr = 11 5 9 ~ OD~l . ~ o 0 ~:oxl I I-l I I ~\ \ ~11111111 n 0 0 ~ ~ !j.~ I _.
\\ \ ~\ III III If ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ HIT
x 0 0 0 0 ~I
1 bOO 0 0 \ \1 ~t2 " I, ,.
}' X )( --)( ! \ I
Iff-\. \ ~ 0
iir-i. H O! ~
~_ NO. 0 ==>-I' --~ -• 'Q '. ~ ., --~. ~~.,.,
ii ~ DESlONED K.T. I r." -::J Geomatrlx Consultanta, Inc. .. n -u. jUt*? Geomatrix ---""""",,,,"000 OE'~' M .... ; 211Wf-::....:::..::::=----l
<. _ ., ._,~ . ..,t Seattle, Washington 98101 Former South Fire Training Area " EN
Renton, Washington REC
CIODAR RI\lIOR
.. .. .. , .. c ... :::::-:-.. ... .. ~ .. ..
,!. "" .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. ..
.. ORDI'fIIAR'(
I'IIGH WA'fER
.. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. "0" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
..
..
.. .. .. .. .. ..
.. ..
.. 64.62 ..
'"
..
... .. .. .. .. ... .. .. ... ... ... .. .. .. ... .. .. ...
.. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
PROPOSED
EXCAVATION
AREA
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
... .. v.;.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Vi
~I
I
I
I
I ------------;----~, I ~,
I '1l'
I %'
PROPOSED
EXCAVATION
AREA
~io o .--> ~ O.
~~
9>
--, ASPHALT--,
L-TI>:XIWAY '--
I. \ \ 91.31 • \
.. .. BUILDING ... ... .. I Oc;,'
I 'to' I ~, -------.. .. ... .. .. .. .. ..
\-: 30.00 ----\
__ l
I ~, I ~,
rr,B\-___ !L~<e.. _ -"'-\--= ,
). " '\ " "P -'" __ -6.?JS--------L..r'
32.40
CLEANOUT
I
I
I
I
I
0 1
!.I
-I
T·HANGAR
, , , , , , , , ,
I
I
, , , ,
I _-----------~\------------
___ ------rL------------
19.70'
_____ ScB'------6'PVC , ------;r.oo-------L.::I~ , ~~ ,
APPROXIMATE
STOCKPILE
AREA
'<"'K"'~ I \
I r-----'~~,-------------,_----------~~-------------I ...,-OMlL
I/"/ PLAS11C SHEETING UTILnv
PIPEUNE
o
88.00
\
I
I
I
I 1948,0 I
--, ASPHALT--,
L-TI>:XIWAY '--
,~
APPROXIMATE
BOTTOM OF
EXCAVATION A' . I t A I ~ I
II r ~,~ 111l..
I I ! , .... u''---__
t 0 1 ~I' ~l EROSION CONTROL BERM DETAIL
SECnONA-A'
EXCAVATION AT UTILITY PIPELINE DETAIL
SECnONB-B'
N.T.S N.T.S
I 0 19.49'
I .... .. ~ "" "" f ~ ... .. I .. ... .. ..
LEGEND
@ID CATCH BASIN
o _ ..
L ~ .. ... .. I" ... .. .. ~,~
• ... ... .. "I ... .... ~""~ ii'! "" "" "" ..". v-"" y. "" y,. "" ..".
11 c ... .. .. ... ...... NOTE' 1-· . 1 v-01" _. ""_.:,, ll': ..... .. .. .. .. .. .. ..... . . _ . ~
ii: ih ... .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. I.. ALL DIMENSIONS IN FEET .••• ~~ """'" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ~ ~ .. .. .. RE'IIS10N CArE APR'IIl Geomatrlx Consultants, Inc .
SPOT ELEVAnON
EXCAVATION AREAS
LANDSCAPED AREAS
SITE PLAN· SOIL EXCAVATION ... • 11193 ..:.;: ::;;"'"C£S' NO. DRAWN ~~.s. /.i _ • 600 University street . ~~ DESI"ED 1(.. ld~ Geomatrlx Suite 1020 FonnerSoulh Are Training Area
S jj ... "" CHECKED K.T. Seattle, Washington 98101 Renton, Washington ii'~ ______ ~:±:::::::::::::::::::::::::f::i::3~R:~:oorn~_=_=K~"=.~_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=~ ____________________ -===~~~~ ______ _L ______ _1 __________ ~::~====~ __________ ~ ________ ~
CE:oAl'l, RIVE:~ ~~~-.J1'1\0l'I ~6,5~
v-
v-
v-
v-
v-
..
v-...
v-
v-.. ~'v-
v-v-v-.. .. ,. v-v-
v-
v-OBDI'F.JAR'G.
PIIGH WA'fER .. .. .. .. ..
v-..
v-.. .. v-v-v-.. .. ..
v-.. .. .. v-"0" v-.. .. v-
v-.. ..
v-
v-
v-
..
v-
..
.. v-v-
v-.. ..
v-.. .. .. v-v-
v-v-.. .. .. v-
v-
v-.. .. .. v-
v-.. .. v-
v-v-
..
v-...
...
...
v-..
v-
v-
v-.. BUILDING v-
v-..
v-v-..
.. v-
v-v-v-
.. v-
v-
v-
...
... ..
..,
.. .. .. --..
v-
v--:;::o-==---
.. -v-~_
-:;.--;..--
~
--
..
v-v-
v-v-
v-..
v-v-
v-.. .. ..
.. v-
v-
PROPOSED
EXCAVATION
AREA
v-.. .. .. v-..
v-.. .. v-
\
I
I
\
\
\
\
I
\
I
p\
~\
I
I
\
J----~
_-----I '
_--_--I c.' \ ~,
\ '%'
I <ill' \ 0,,'
\ '1.'
I ~",'
PROPOSED
EXCAVATION
AREA
I ~, I ~,
B ._--------'>-'9'~~ , rc""' 6"PVC 1> ,
I
I
\
I
\
0\
1-..\
~\
,
T_HANGAR
, , , , , , , , , ,
\ ,
----, ASPHALT---,
<--TAXIWAY '--
---------
\ -------~\------------
~ 4'PV" _______ ~D_----6·PitC--,
\
\
\
_________ LL------------
~"",'~~~~ I ' \ ' 19.70' APPROXIMATE
STOCKPILE
AREA
\ '
\ ' \ \ A"MIL 0
I ./ / PlASTIC SHEETlNG UTILITY
PIPELINE
\
f ,.. ,0'-\ , A \ ~ \ ~ \ ~ \ ~ \ I \
19,A-·(.i:\
----, ASPHALT---,
<--TAXIWAY <---
~ 0\ ~ ~ . ~\
H \ I~ \ 0
19
.
49
' ~~ \ v-1i~ v-v-v-v-Ii ;1; .. v-v-\ NOTES' ..
o.w .. .. \.. • E:' ... ...... v-... ... ... v-.. .... v-v-v-\ ALL DIMENSIONS IN FEET ~o ..... v-...... ... ...
Irl I r-:=--1116T01~
~II I
EROSION CONTROL BERM DETAIL
SECTION A-A'
N.T.S
LEGEND
@ill CATCH BASIN
o SPOT ELEVATION
EXCAVATION AREAS
1~
APPROXIMATE
BOTTOM OF
EXCAVATION
1 ,'-','---__
EXCAVATION AT UTILITY PIPELINE DETAIL
SECTION B-B'
N.T.S
OEV~~\NG
: JUt 27 2\1· ... 0,-'. ~Z --t\\,~ 1-:--1 LANDSCAPED AREAS a 10 20
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 5 FEET RECE\v..eiJXlMATE SCALE IN FEET r-2o ___ ~ ~ v-v-v-.. v-........... ... ..... ... ... v-... v-v-I.' NO CONTOURS SHOWN
.:.:: RfFERfN
CfS
' NO. REVISION v-v-v-v-.. v-v-v-... r SINCE TOPOGRAPHY IS ~ iii """ DAlE APRYIl v-\... LESS THAN 5 FEET.
ti ~ I».lUU DRAWN __ :.: .. :.;P.:::.5. _____ _ i!i 0. DESIGNED K.T. \ ~ ~ , Geomatrlx Consultants Inc H CHECKED K.T, ~rt...J Geomatrix 60~UnlyersltyStraat ' • TOPOGRAPHY MAP IlATe07/12/".,7
0. 0 REVIEWED K.T. SUite 1020 Seattle, Washington 98101
PROJECT NO.: 11193
Former South Fire Training Area
Renton. Washington
.... --
•
• •
•
• •
•
, • •
CEDAR. R.1\lER. ~"1\O" ,&)1<
, • • • • • • •
';;...~
• •
,
;::: ....... ? ... =-p----.'
... ;. '" \t.o ... .., \10
.... ... '" \10 •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • " " •
•
• • • • . • • ,
,
•
•
• • • • .. .... • •
.' • ',.' •••••• '/ PROPOSED . .' . 'D,' .' .' ,EXCAVATION
... .... ~ '" AREA
• ,. • • • • • • • , • • • • • • , • • • • • • .... ... '" ... •
•
• • • •
~ . ~' .. ,. ,'--~ .." --... -~ . . .' .' .... --:-'". " " " .
. ' " ., .. .--. -.:;.....-:-' . . ' . ~. ... .. -------. . .' .,-,
-~ ~ _.,:->:.~ .... "'I .' • " ,. -----,---' . .' ' . . '.' " t •••
• • .' I· '
• ,
•
• ---, ASPHALT-?
L-TPV<IWAY .:--
PROPOSED
EXCAVATION
AREA
\
\
\
iQl
• • •
· " ,La> • • •
'I-.... ~ 101-~ "'" 0' • ... O-v.-V;:::; .... '" "..... ...
• • • •
• _ 0;;.----;..--
=~-
~-§"'"'' 0::" ,0:"""" ''So)' , I -~-'------
ID
•
,.... .~.~ .. '. '" "'......... .... '" ... ~ ...... -. ... ... -....
I~: .... ..!;.:~-'.-
..... ' ----T-HANGAR
CLEANOUT
, . _-------~\...,------~--.----o.-------~--...,.
---;-~----------{fpr--S'PVC , ASPHALT -?
TAXIWAY .:--
APPROXIMATE
STOCKPILE
AREA
Po: 19.48'(+:
~,~""'~ I ' I \
\ " I ,
\ '. ---, ASPHALT-?
I \ L-TPV<IWAY .:--
I \
I,
,} , u ,
19.70' o
~I \ .... '"
I ~ 19.49' ... "eo .... V. .... ....
\!I .... \ .. .... .... ....... '" I .... "" .... -' .... .... '" .... '" ........ ....... .... .... ... \... ",'" ..... ... ... .... eo \ I .... .... , '" ....... ............ ....\ ... ~ .......J ... ... .", \.... v. v. '" .... ... 11-'. ....
.,( _ '" v-v-y.. • \I-.... Of. '\ ....
It -.... "' ...................................... t'" '" .. "' ........ "''''''' .... \1-.... "'"
If '" "''''' ................ \1-.................. "' ............. r"' ........ ","' .• "' .... "' .... \,..
i .... "" ... ..... .......... .... \I-'" "" \I-\I-.. 'II-I"" "" ......... '" .... .... "" \ y.. '" ... ... ............ i<. v. v............... ............ 'II-.... '\
6Ull .... .... \I-........... '" .... J'" .... ....... 11-....
PLAS11C SHEETING UTIl.I1Y .... "" ........ .... .... "" \I-.... I ....... .... LEGEND
r-;:=i========:;-l PIPELINE \10 .... .... v. y.. .... '" '" l ....... "' .... \I-"" '" .... , '" '" f ~ [::J APPROXIMATE '........ ••••• , .1'. '.' @Ql CATCH BASIN
z HAYBAlE 6TOfs" BOTTOM OF \10 ... "'.... ",,'" ... "" "'.... ~ '"
! ,I' EXCAVAnON "" II-",,'" .... "" "'" "" "'........ "" ....
j-~.... .... '" '" '" '"
, ... ........ '" v-........ '\I-"" Yo ... I ~ EROSION CONTROL BERM DETAil EXCAVATION AT UTILITY PIPELINE DETAIL ... ...... "" "'Yo'" ....... v.-...... '" ... '" II-"' .. v-'" ...... '"
III '" .... '" '\I-... Ka SECTION A-A' SECTION B-B' .... '" ..,.. ... "" ..... '" '" s.~ N.T.S N.T.s ... .,. Yo "" .... '" ..... .....
o SPOT ELEVATION
~'\l
~
•
EXCAVATION AREAS
-'>-.O>.J
I '. ',~ LANDSCAPED AREAS • ,
• •
~
1.
2.
A gnlding pennH application has been submitted to the CIty 01
Renton. Contractor shall provide their. name, eddrass. Washlng!on
Contr8ctor's Dcense number, and the City of Renton Business
License number to obtain the pennil
The work. includes excavation and disposal of contaminated son and
site fesbaHou. Prior to mobtllzation, prepare and submit B project
Wotlo Plan and site specIIIc HeaI1h and Safely Plan to tho engineer
for review.
3. Prior to the start of excavation, conduct an independent underground
utility locate at tha work area .
4. The soils within the excavation area are contaminated with TPH,
BlEX, Naphthalono, and PCBs .
5. InstaD straw waUles around the proposed work area to prevent
sedtment MH)I\ and rurKlff to and from the work area •
6. InstaD sedimeirtation and erosion conb'ol measures such as filter
socks, at every catch basin.
7. Tho """"""ted son shaD be placed d~ Into raIloff bins. If tho use
of mDoII bins Is not_, soli wID be hauled to an esIabIished
stockpile area. The stockpile area shaD be Uned with 6-mD plastic
sh_g. Tho edges of tho atockplle shall be bermod and tho plastic
sheeting shall extend over the berm to prevent stormwater run:-on and
run-off. The edge of the stockpile area shall be a minimum of 8 feet
from the edge of the excavation.
8. Excavate the contaminated son to tho approximate dopth of 5 fool
The engineer shaD detennlne the exact depth of excavation.
Excavate around the utiJitIes so as not to undarmb1e. Tha edge of
excavalions shall be a minbnum of 5 feet from any buDding .
9. The excavation sidewalls shaD be sloped 1H:1V or at the angle of
natural reposa, whichever Is flatter.
"-0. Assist the engineer to collect confirmation soD samples from the
.... _ sIdowalIs and bottom with tho oxcavaIor.
11. Place the excavatacl soBin the rolloff blns. If reDoR" bins cannot be
used, place soil in the stockpDe area. Cover the excavated son with
plastic ~ over nlght end dullng _ poitods.
12. Remove any !reo liquids that may accumulata within tho stockpile
area and store in appropriate contalners and dispose offsHe. PuITip
out col)taminatad groundwater as dlrecled by the Engineer.
13. _ tho oxx:avation with InoI1, _n, Imported, granular liD. The
_ matarial shaD be weD grad8d with 100 pen:onl passing 1.5
Inch aieve and no more than 10 percent passing 200 sieVe. Submit
the source, gradation, and maxtmum dry density, ASTM 01557, to
tho Englnoor for appruval aa part of tho project submittals.
14. Compad tho bacIdiIJ In .12-lnch lifts up to 104nchos from the surface.
Tho bacIdiD shaD be Compaded to 95% of the maximum dry donslty.
Backfill over the pipes shaD be compacted to 90% of the maximum
dry density to 3-faet above the top of the pipe, then increase
compaction effort to 95'l4.
15. Place 6 inches of 518 inch crushed rock on the backfiD to 4-tnches
from the surface and compact to 95% of maximum dry density.
16. Pave the ext:avstlon area to match existing grade. Material and
lnstaDation ihau'be in accordance with Renton Municipal AIrport
specilications.
17. Remove aD miscellaneous items from the site and sweep-clean the
work area. Restore damaged landscape area and re-seed.
18. AD dimensions ara ap~ltIG rz
oE'l~ Of ReNToN 0 15 30
:001 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET
":: RfffRflfCf$' NO. RE.VISfON QAT[ APRVD -...... ;,J
DRAWN A.P.s. Geomatrlx Consultants, Inc.
600 University Street
PLANNED EXCAVATIO
i Q\1VU
D£SlGNED _-::";:;.T:.. ______ _
j~, ~ _ _;",;L-----------=
REVIEWED K.T.
fW~ Geomatrix Sulta 1020
Seattle, WaShington 98101 FIGURE
2
1-06/28/01 tECE\'lEO Pm£CT 110,111'"
Former South Fire Training Area
°t Renton, Washington
, , , ,
\ , , ,
I
I
I
I , , , , , ,
'/ /K
~~,
//",-, /~O~ , / --:~O U' //r..~G it'
(/ \j,..<::i :0\
I ,
I ,
I r~L
/
/
-I ---------'uJ ----------O.~---\ '\
•
•
•
•
•
• •
• • • • • •
\
\
(.)
•
I ,
I , , , , ,
I ,
I ,
I u,
I ~,
I <0,
I \
I ,
I ,
I \ I ,
I ,
I ,
I \
\ \
I ,
• •
• • • • • • •
•
•
• '0 • •
•
• • • •
/
/
/
/
/
/
I
I ,
I
I ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
cl
/
/
/
//
I
I
I
I
I ,
I ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I /
1//
/1
I ,
I , ,
I
I
I
I
IU
lit
1:0
I
\
I
I
LJ-
o I:;;
--' ~ w c
it: 10<
...JZCI) ::I: ~o>-: c u
F-Z Z ~ zt> UJ .....
Ow wC!l urn z ...J
Q rn
li1 w
i i
z c o w
;:: ~ « u ~ rn U c
115 ~
~D
•
(.~ _____ -----~Zl---
---o~~-----~J---
I
I , , ,
I
I
I ,
I ,
I
I
I
I
Iu
lit ,:"
I
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
:3 n o 0
• H++--1f-+--l !;!
I!IMp'-Vl.:IS:I-UBldlAn :eWSN HUIMBJQ Wd3S-;o0\£6H H:S :~Bd 8ujM8JQ
8Jeq~S8:.(q ~ld 'wd6Jt:,· lOl9"(JlO :91BQ 10Id
,
,
• ,
,
•
,
,
,
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t/
/#~\
.... -;So$J \ //~# ~'\ /~~~ tl
( I
\ I
\ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\ --.... /
I /
1/ /1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\t
I
I
I
I
• m
~" ----------~, ___ I~r----
-----O,ZL--,..J
I
--_\ ---------I~} ----"'5.z.-1" ...,
\ \
,
,
iil~;jj
lIl>=O: « ""> iE()
""1;\
\ I
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ ~\
\ .\
\ .\
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ I
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:~ I.
I
~.--r;r;T77:77/; \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\ ""'~---o---:-~,\ \ ,
, ,
•
,
, •
•
•
, ,
•
\
\
\ , \
\ . \
\
\
\
\
\
\
'" ;
HI
• • --'--•
• ,
•
•
•
•
~
i .. : ",.,'-:-" 1~' v--r .... -', ". -It
~.
IJ
~
h
"
• ..: 'Ir ......... Oiml~AR'(
t.i ..... / H10~ WA'fER ...
',:~: v--.... .~~:A.~ II-
•
•
'-,
'. ::. v-
v-""D'"
•
BUILDING
•
r--:: 30.00 ----\
APPROXIMATE
STOCKPILE
AREA
A'
• il ~::I~ 110.
•
•
"""'"
,
• •
•
•
•
... 64.62 ...
•
• •
• •
PROPOSED
EXCAVATION
AREA
• • om: IN'IMlI
•
• •
• •
---..-!:!...£
~ -...£:.
"""'" ~
"'""'" u.
• •
•
~---
32.40
, , , , , , , , , u, ;, , , ,
-~-----; , \ , .;.\
I ~\
1 ~\ , \' , \' , ' ,
sciL _ 6"PVC 'P , L-~ ________ "t-,-
, , , , ,
01 T-HANGAR 0., -, , , ,
, , ,
PROPOSED
EXCAVATION
AREA
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
%~~ 1p o.
~c)
"P
--z-~::;;J L--
91'''--1
\
.0..---
, 1...-___ ~ ___________ JCiL-------
-9 """"
---j,
\
\
• • • •
•
• •
,¥* Geomatrix
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
~:
---Z-~JL-
-, , , , 0 19.49' . , , .
" . ~
•
NOTE:
• •
• , . AU. DIMENSIONS IN FEET
Geomatrbl Consuttanta, Inc.
GOO Un~ StrMt
Suit. 1020
BeattIe, Washington 98101
•
\
\
\
\
\ .M.
"""'-~
Dill.
EROSION CONTROl BERM DETAIL
SEcnON~'
N.T"
LEGEND
@1 CATCH BASIN
o SPOT ELEVATION
~ EXCAVATION AREAS
[3 lANDSCAPED AREAS
19.70'
o
~"~
~~" ~~~
1 , EXCAVATION
EXCAVATION AT UTILITY PIPELINE DETAIL
SECTION B-B'
N.T.8
m "
o\PPIWXDoIATE $CAI..£ IN FEET
SITE PLAN -SOil EXCAVATION !WI: 01/12/'lM1
Fonner SDu1h Fn Training Atea
RenIDn, Wash/ngIon
PRO.lC'JNC.:l111.5
RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
_---:E
\:',
,\' ;.
, \ .
. . \'
, \'.
'\.' " .. \ '
. ", \.'
\ .
,~.·~'~~~·¥~r~t~,ft ~ .
\ . '
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
=-Q ,... toO\Ctm~ ....
~,._ 'IIIdm:t·lo.wJaO.-a_
Washington
. "Note:
Site is the approxlmate location of the
, FormersquttrFire'Tralnlng Center
" . ." ""' "
o 960 Feet
I
Note: Base Data from King County 2004.
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Former South Fire Training Area
Renton Municipal Airport
Renton, Washington
".~ Geomatrix Figure 1
• • CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING / BUILDING / PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
Date: January 2, 2008
To: City Clerk's Office
From: Stacy Tucker
Subject: Land Use File Closeout
Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City
Clerk's Office.
Project Name:
LUA (file) Number:
Cross-References:
AKA's:
Project Manager:
Acceptance Date:
Applicant:
Owner:
Contact:
PID Number:
ERC Approval Date:
ERC Appeal Date:
Administrative Approval:
Appeal Period Ends:
Public Hearing Date:
Date Appealed to HEX:
By Whom:
HEX Decision:
Date Appealed to Council:
By Whom:
Council DeCision:
Mylar Recording Number:
Airport Soil Remediation
LUA-07-081, SME, ECF
Jill Ding
August 7, 2007
The Boeing Company
City of Renton
Carl Bach -The Boeing Company
0723059007
August 27, 2007
September 18, 2007
September 12, 2007
Date:
Date:
Project Description: The applicant has requested Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Shoreline
Exemption for the removal of contaminated soil at the Renton Municipal Airport. Two areas are
proposed to be excavated to the water table (approximately 5 to 8 feet below grade), one to the'
north of the T-Hanagar and the other to the east of the T-Hanagar. It is estimated that
approximately 1,300 cubic yards of contaminated soil will be removed from the site. Once the soil
is removed, the site will be backfilled with clean, compacted fill material and overlying pavement.
The project site is located within the 200-foot shoreline buffer of the Cedar River. The Cedar River
is designated as an Urban Environment at this location.
Location: 616 W Perimeter Road
Comments:
Bob Rivily
254 Seneca Avenue NW
Renton, WA 98057
tel: (425) 255-4264
(party of record)
Updated: 08/29/07
• •
PARTIES OF RECORD
AIRPORT SOIL REMEDIATION
LUA07-081, SME, ECF
Carl Bach
The Boeing Company
PO Box 3707; MCIW-12
Seattle, WA 98124
(applicant / contact)
City of Renton -Airport
,
(owner)
(Page 1 of 1)
City oenton Department of Planning / Building / pu~orks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~)I"'" COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 21, 2007
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-081, SME, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUB6ST 7)007
APPLICANT: The Boeing Company PROJECT MANAdJili Din~
PROJECT TITLE: Airport Soil Remediation PLAN REVIEW: ~ ... ' )
SITE AREA: 108,200 square leet BUILDING AREA (qross): N/A
IV'
LOCATION: 616 W Perimeter Road I WORK ORDER NO: 77788
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Environmental (SEPAl Review and a Shoreline Exemption for the removal
of contaminated soil at the Renton MuniCipal Airport. Two areas are proposed to be excavated to the water table (approximately 5 to 8
leet below grade), one to the north 01 the T-Hanagar and the other to the east of the T-Hanagar. It is estimated that approximately
1,300 cubic yards 01 contaminated soil will be removed from the site. Once the soil is removed, the site will be backfilled with clean,
compacted fill material and overlying pavement. The project site is located within the 200-loot shoreline buffer of the Cedar River. The
Cedar River is designated as an Urban Environment at this location.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earlh
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals ~
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
-;;;,nOOF~.,
14:000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is ne ded to properly assess this proposal.
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
CITY OF RENTON
CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM
SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
EXEMPTION FILE NO.:
PROJECT NAME:
OWNER:
APPLICANT/CONTACT:
PROJECT MANAGER:
PROPOSAL:
PROJECT LOCATION:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
SEC-TWN-R:
WATER BODY:
Exemption from Shoreline Management.doc
September 12, 2007
LUA-07-081, SME, ECF
Airport Soil Remediation Shoreline Exemption
City of Renton -Airport
Carl Bach
The Boeing Company
PO Box 3707; MCIW-12
Seattle, WA 98124
Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner
Applicant is proposing to remove contaminated soil at
the Renton Municipal Airport. Two areas are proposed to
be excavated to the water table (approximately 5 to 8
feet below grade), one to the north of the T-Hangar and
the other to the east of the T-Hangar. It is estimated that
approximately 1,300 cubic yards of contaminated soil will
be removed from the site. Once the soil is removed, the
site will be backfilled with clean, compacted fill material
and overlying pavement. The project site is located
with in the 200-foot shoreline buffer of the Cedar River.
The Cedar River is designated as an Urban Shoreline
Environment at this location.
616 W Perimeter Road
POR SECS 7 & 18-23-5 & POR TOBINS D C INCL POR
PLATTED & VAC STS LY WLY OF COMM W W # 2 N
OF N LN DIXIE AVE & ELY OF STATE HWAY # 5 &
ELY & SLY OF FOLG LN BEG ON ELY MGN SD HWAY
AT PT 5 FT S OF N LN OF LOT 8 BLK 18 BRYN MAWR
TH E 89.23 FT TH N 05-16-51 E 438.90 FT TH N 40-09-
47 E 188.55 FT TH N 60 FT TH N 29-00-40 W 197.07
FT TH S 88-27-28 E 90.83 FT TH N 01-32-32 W 40 FT
TH S 88-27-28 E 234.53 FT TH S 35-00-00 E 142.41 FT
TH E 403.70 FT LESS LOTS 19 TO 22 INCL BLK 4
RENTON REAL ESTATE COS 1ST ADD LESS
PORTION FOR LANE HANGAR CONDOMINIUM
7-23-5E
Cedar River
------------------------------------------------
An exemption from a Shorelinlanagement Substantial, Development Ipelt is hereby granted on the
proposed project described on the attached form for the following reason(s):
Hazardous substance remedial actions. The procedural requirements of chapter 90.58
RCW shall not apply to a project for which a consent dcree, order or agreed order has
been issued pursuant to chapter 70.1 05D RCW or to the department of ecology when it
conducts a remedial action under chapter 70.105D RCW. The department shall, in
consultation with the appropriate local government, assure that such projects comply
with the sUbstantive requirements of chapter 90.58 RCW, chapeter 173-26 WAC and
the local master program.
The proposed development is consistent or inconsistent with (check one):
CONSISTENT
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Site Plan
cc: Owner
Applicant/Contact
File
INCONSISTENT
Exemption from Shoreline Management.doc
Policies of the Shoreline Management Act.
The guidelines of the Department of Ecology
where no Master Program has been finally
approved or adapted by the Department.
The Master Program.
Neil Watts, Director
Development Services Division
,',
I-H
Washington
Note:
Site Is the approximate location of the
FOml8r South Fire Training Center
o 960 Feet
I
OEV8-c$~~W:~ING ,;N.,;;O:.:;te:;.: :..Ba::s:;.e::.D:..ata::..:;.fro::.m:.:..:..:==:2..::20::04.,;;. _______ -l
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Former South Fire Training Area
Renton Municipal Airport
Renton, Washington
$!«! Geomatrix Figure 1
·.~o. , ~~
-
ASPHALT -z--
T.4YIWAV
A
APPROXIMATE
STOCKPILE
AREA
o
.:
CEDAR RIVER E\.~,,~~I~
PROPOSED
Xr..AVATlON
AREA
_n
'0"",'''' £XCWAT1ON
-...... ---
~
<I.
~ ...
ASPHALT -,
: --Z-TAXIWAY ~
1
I
1
~ ,
1
--}----\
1
-----
'-
1
1
1
@<l
.-0.. __________ _
1
1
1
1
1
I
~,
.1 '
1 •
, I'
J ' . , .
• 1 .,"
,@',
-----
19.49'
\
\
\
\
\
\
\ --, ASPHALT-,
\ t.-TAXIWAY '--
~
\ .
\
\
\
\
@ CATCH BASIN
@ SPOT ELEVATION
~ EXCAVATION AREAS
c::=:=J LANDSCAPED AREAS
law e
I.
,
..
,
..
,
•
A pdIng ~ ~ has t.o.I wbnIitt8d 10 the ely 01 Renk:In. CcInIr.,::Ior .... pn:Mde1hW _, ~ ~
~ 1IcenM ........ .nd #.-CllyofRonIOrI a..me..
U_ number 10 obIe!n !he permit.
TheVlQ'k~~and~oI~"'_
.~ PriDrID~~_IJUbrTIIt.ptqecI
wrn PIt!n and lite cptcJIIc lieallh and SaIaty PIM to !he Engfteer
for ...........
PriDrblhlst.rlol_atIan,cancIucI .. ~~
uWy bcate Ilt the WI>It .....
Tho IOiII wIIIIIrlllle ~Ion ...... .,. COIlI:amInIIIed wIIh TPH,
BTEl(, ~,arw:lPC8a.
1nI:td ..... ...me. -..w:I1be propoHG work .... 10 ~
sediment run-on and rIIIM)fI' 10 encr Iforn the work_ .
IrIIIaII ............. _~DQIItft:II_auc:h_.
acc:b, .. -.y cA:tI bIIe:IrI.
Tilt 1NKlmIt.d .011 ah., be placed dlteclly Info rDIIotI Ilm. If IhIIIIII
01 roIcff bint It net ~. aoI wm he hauled 10 WI ..cabbhMI
~ __ Tho~ __ malIbehlcl.., s-dplMllc
~ The ~ dille SIOdcpIIe Ihd be berrned _the pIatic
IhMlilg ahd extend a..r Ihe berm 10 prevenI.tormwlter rurHm lind
run-ofI'. The.rae of lhellOQple _ ... be • mlo:*nunI of a In!
!tom the ~ 01 the uc:.vdon
~"'~"'Ion.~daplhof6"" .
The Ena"-1hIlI delMnlne Iha 8XllcI depIh oI8:I<CII...tion.
~ anIIIIId lila utIiIIa 10 .. not to under!!W. lb, edge 01
UC8VlIIiorIa Ihd be. mamum '" 5 fMt 110m 8nY buIcIrog..
9. The _Ibn .... IheI be ala,*, 1H:1V 01 I' the Ingle cI
naWr.I~.v.fllc:havwbn.tlel.
10. "*-IIt1he~fDcoIIc:t~lIOIaMlp/lnfromh
...-II8IiOn IIdItw/Ib and boItom wilt! ..,........a.
11. Plfcethe-*llOllntherollolfbinl. lfrollofl'blN.cannocbe
lIUd,placedhlled::lClcpa._. C-the~IOII"'"
pIIdc: IIIeI6Ig __ night 8I'Id <bring IIftII fI8IIocII.
12. ~aty flMlIq\IkI,tt.t rnayacou"'-"Mewfthln Iht 8IockpIIt
._ Mel .. In apprvpr\PI ~ and ~ aIJda. ~
out~~ __ ~bf'Ihe~.
13. e.ckflln-..~WI!tIInarI,dNn,lmporte(l,granulllrftll. Th,
blddlll ...... tWfl bewtU graded with tOOptnXlnl palling 1.e
IncII ..... n Il(lIIIOOIIbIn 10".11lIIII PMti1(1200 .... 9ubrril
Ihrt -. CIfIdIlIDn. 8I'Id maD!uM dry cIemly. AtJTM 01557, 10
Ihrt ~ lor IIppOO'Mt _ pan oflhrt pI"(ljoIct &uImdIIaII.
14. Compae! lho *"fiI1n 1211ch Ittt up to 1G-b:het from !he~.
ThI t.ck!lll1Ihd III 0CIr!IpI(IIad to 9!1% oftha...ur&lnl drt dandy.
BaektII_1IIII ptpn IbII be ~ 10 110% ofilia muwu:n
dry cIIndr 10 3-fIoet --. .... top of !hi plpa, 11*1 m-
oompacIIOn tllort to 95%.
15. ~ lindIII 01 518 IncII erwhed rod< 00'1 ..,. t.ckt.I to ~
from II1II ~ 8I'Id ~ 10 95" of fnfttm\Im *t dtndy.
18. '"-1he_IIoo_klmtIc:h~IV"". Mlt8rial1IIId
·1nItab1lon ..... III n IICQ)I"dancit with Renbn ~ AI"patt --11. ~"~lI8OUIlarnafromtht"'IHId_p-dtantlla wort: 81M. Rutare dlrnagtd IandIcapa _ Mel !Heed.
18. AI·dImtnIiDnI_~.
" ~
APPIUlXIIMTE SCALE IN F££f
Oeomatr\x Conaulhlntll, tnc, PLANNED EXCAVATION
~Geomatrix .....'020 1II'f P ... "."", .. ny... ~~ LAtI'"",," I ~ ~ "'"
Seatttto, W .... I~ 88101 _lTV n Rt;;.NT~~ ~_~Ataa F'lG~RE
JUt 272007
RECEIVED
• •
CITY OF RENTON
CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 29th day of August, 2007, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope
containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to:
Name
Agencies
City of Renton -Airport
Carl Bach, The Boeing Company
Bob Rivily
(Signature of Sender): ~~
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) S8
COUNTY OF KING )
See Attached
Owner
Applicant/Contact
Party of Record
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker
Representing
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and
purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Dated: 8/-&0/07
Notary (Print)::-.-:t~~lC.-L->P:l.CL....I.~~~~~~i=--="":"":~-.:f---l
My appointment expires:
Project Name: Airport Soil Remediation
Project Number: LUA07 -081, SME, ECF
template ~ affidavit of service by mailing
,-.'-•
Dept. of Ecology'
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
WSDOT Northwest Region'
Attn: Ramin Pazooki
King Area Dev. Serv" MS-240
PO Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
US Army Corp. of Engineers'
Seattle District Office
Attn: SEPA Reviewer
PO Box C-3755
Seattle, WA 98124
Boyd Powers •
Depart. of Natural Resources
PO Box 47015
Olympia, WA 98504-7015
KC Dev. & Environmental Servo
Attn: SEPA Section
900 Oakesdale Ave. SW
Renton, WA 98055-1219
Metro Transit
Senior Environmental Planner
Gary Kriedt
• • AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING
(ERe DETERMINATIONS)
WDFW -Stewart Reinbold' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. •
c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer
3190 160'h Ave SE 39015 _172"d Avenue SE
Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092
Duwamish Tribal Office' Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program'
4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert
Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"d Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092-9763
KC Wastewater Treatment Division' Office of Archaeology & Historic
Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation·
Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer
201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343
Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343
City of Newcastle City of Kent
Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP
Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director
13020 SE 72"d Place 220 Fourth Avenue South
Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895
Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila
Municipal Uason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official
Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd.
201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188
Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868
Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology
Real Estate Services NW Regional Office
Title Examiner 3190 160'h Avenue SE
700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452
PO Box 34018
Seattle, WA 98124-4018
Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an 'Optional DNS", the marked agencies and
cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application .•
template -affidavit of service by mailing
STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING }
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising
Representative of the
Renton Reporter
a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general
circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date
of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language
continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The
Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the
Superior Court ofthe State of Washington for King County.
The notice in the exact fonn annexed was published in regular issues of the
Renton Reporter (and not in supplement fonn) which was regularly
distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed
notice, a:
Public Notice
was published on September I, 2007.
The full amount..of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum
of $ 1».00.
/.?f/A'lIiA ?77 ~t-M..
EiOdaM.-Mijls
Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter
Subscribed and sworn to me this 4th day of September, 2007. ",",,,,,,,, ,,_-CAN.,.. I",
.. '", Q .•••••• ~( "
..:-v •• ;t.\SSION·~·._ 0 ". IS ((;Ln.#.. ~ "o~ '1" ..... "t-~ ,D~ /J72 ~ UJ {" NOTARY "'i"\ ~
B D Cantelon = -I ~ PUBLIC : =
Notruy Public for the State of Washington, Residing i~~. Washington ; 0< ::: ,...<\.-.°01 .·L"~ P. O. Number: -:; ,,-··.::01120'~.·· r~ ~ , O~ ........ ~V'~
"'" WAS,",\ _-" 11,""",,,-
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE
RENTON. WASffiNGTON
The Environmental Review
Committee has issued a
Detennination of Non-Significance.-
Mitigated for the following project
under the authority of the Renton
Municipal Coo..
Airport Soil Remediation
LUA07'{)81. 8ME, ECF
Location: 616 W Perimeter Road.
The applicant has requested
Environmental (SEPA) Review
and a Shoreline Exemption for the
removal of contaminated soil at
the Renton Municipal Airport.
Two areas are proposed to be
excavated to the water table
(approximately 5 to 8 feet below
grade), one to the north of the T-
Hangar and the other to the east
of the T-Hangar. It is estimated
that approximately 1,300 cubic
yards of contaminated soil will be
removed from the site. Once the
soil is removed, the site will be
backfilled with clean, compacted
fiU material and overlying
pavement. The project site is
located within the 200-foot
shoreline buffer of the Cedar
River. The Cedar River is
designated as an Urban
Environment at this location.
Appeals of the environmental
determination must be filed in writing
on or before 5:00 PM on September 18,
2007. Appeals mU8t be filed in writing
t~gethcr with the required $75.00
application fee ", .. itk Hearing
Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South
Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057.
Appeals to the Examiner are governed
by City of Renton Municipal Code
Section 4-8·110.8. Additional
information regarding the appeal
process may be obtained from the
Renlml City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-
6510.
Published in the Renton Reporter,
September 1, 2007. #864ll23.
•
•
• •
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ISSUANCE OF A OETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE· MITIGATED (DNS-M)
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
PROJECT NAME: Airport Soli Remediation
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA07..o81, 8ME, ECF
LOCATION: 616 W Perlmatar Ro~d
DESCRIPTION: Thl applicant h .. requ .. t.cl Environmental ~SEPA) Revl,w and" ShoreLine exemption
for the removal of I:Ontamtnaled soil at the Ranlan Munlelpl" Airport. Two alltils.re proposed to be excavated to
the water table (approltlmately 5 to 8 ",t below grade), one to the north of the T-Hang:ar and the Dlherto Ihe ... 1
of the ToHangar.1t I, •• llmated tllat apprOXimately 1,300 cubic yards of contaminated loll will be removed from
th' ,lt8. Once th' .011 Is I'fImovlHl, the alte will ba backfill.,;! with cl .. n, complclad fill material and overlying
pav'mllnt. The project altto I, Ioc.ated within tIM :ZOO-foot ahoNllno buff .. of the Cedar Rivar. Tha C~r Rlvar Is
d .. lgnatltd al an Urban Envlronm.nt at till. IocaUon.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT
THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
Appeal, 01 tha environmental dalarmlnatlon mUll ba mad In writing on or balD .. 5:00 PM on Saptembar 1B, 2007.
Appeals mUlt 1M Iliad In wriling togethlr with tha rtqulrad $75.00 application f .. with: Hailrlng Ex.mlnar, City of
Rlnton, 1055 Soulh Gl'ildy WilY, Renlon, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner a .. govemld by City of Rantan
Munlclplll Code Section 4-I-110.B. AddltionallnlormlUon rlglrdlng the Ippeal proe ... may be obtained from the
Rtonton City Clerk', Office, (426) 430-6510.
IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL OETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND
ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. "
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
Plaase Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identlflcatlon~~-
CERTIFICATION
I. JET}! <1nS£fl.. • hereby certify that -,l-copies of the above document
were posted by me in ---.2.... conspicuous places or nearby the described property on
~"'':\~~:\
DATE: ~"!.I-C?
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M)
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
PROJECT NAME: Airport 5011 Remediation
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA07-081, SME, ECF
LOCATION: 616 W Perimeter Road
DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requested Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Shoreline Exemption
for the removal of contaminated soil at the Renton Municipal Airport. Two areas are proposed to be excavated to
the water table (approximately 5 to 8 feet below grade), one to the north of the T -Hangar and the other to the east
. of the T-Hangar.lt is estimated that approximately 1,300 cubic yards of contaminated soli will be removed from
the site. Once the soli Is removed, the site will be backfilled with clean, compacted fill materIal and overlying
pavement. The project site is located within the 200-foot shoreline buffer of the Cedar River. The Cedar River is
designated as an Urban Environment at this location.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT
THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on September 18, 2007.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of
Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton
Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the
Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND
ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
, ' '.'
Kathy Keolker, Mayor,
August29, 2007
Carl Bach
The, Boeing Company
, PO BoxJ707"MCIW-12;'
" Seaitle,W A 98124
'SUBJECT: 'Airport SQil Remediation. '
"" " '" LuA07~081, SME; Eel'
, DearMt .• Bach: '
',' " . .'~ .
""CITY.F'RENTON
,', Pianning/BuildinglPublicWorks Department
, GreggZlmmerman P.E;, Administrator
, .. ' . ','
, , ,Th.is letter. is writt~n onbehalf'ofth~~Erivii6nmen~alR.~~i~~'Committee (ERC);to advis~ you
,,', that theyhavecompletecl their r~yiew oLthesilbj~ctproject\lndhave' issued, a; threshold
, 'beterminationof N(jri-Significahce~Mitiga:ted.whh,M:iiigatiol1 Measures. ,Please refer to the'
" ' enciosed ERe Report and Debsiiin; Section Cforalistofth~Miii~ation Measures. . ,,' . ;". ,". '. , ~:"'.': .~ -', ,~, :" '.: '",' . ~~ : ' .. ~: .'. ", ;' ':'.: ","::".: ", .,,""'~";',:" .. ' .:~r ::'.'::{';-~,:J::\:,,:.:).>:i., ' :", . ,:',", '. "-, .::~~'.:",' .,:' : .. ":: -",' ,'" -.. ,'.
": ., ..... ',' Appeals !If th,eenvlronJ1lental deteqlul1!1tIon.must,b~fiIedln",rl~mg on.!lf before 5:00 PM.
ori:Septembe( ~8, 2007 .<App~als' J1lustbe·;(Ile#in'~~riting;\~~e*~r wit~ the required $75.00
. ....
:--
"~" ; ..
., 'applicati<,Jn fee with:' HearihgExaminer,Cit'y;ofRtll1ton;,1055 South Qrady Way, Renton,WA
',,' ,)8057:, Appeals to: the,Examine'r~r( governedby:City of Re l1to!l:Muhi6ipal Code Section 4,8-
,11O.RAdditio,nal il}fo~ati?nregari:ling the appeal:proc~~s:iriay~heol:itained fro!B the Rertton "
City Clerk's O(fice, (425) 439"65 FO.·..' , . " . .
" ' \' -, • ' , ' '. " , • > • :', '.:', ," ... ". 'J , ••
'".," 'lfth~ Environmental Deietmination is;app~afed;a: pllblic' hearing date ,wlllt)e set ahd 'all parties "
, .", nqtified.' The' preceding infoimation\vill," assist you in ,plarming'for' implemehtation .of your
" .. projeCt and (mabie you to. exercise YOUf appeaj'iights'more ful1y, if you' ~hoosetodo so. If you
;have any questi6ns or desire.CJarifi~ati<iiiofthe above,plea~ecall rrieat'(425) 430n719. " , " . -, -' . .. '. . ' ..' ""." -',: """,,,, " ~ "" .'
"For the Environmental Review Committee, , ".. ".',
, :'.4U 1{,.;t2. ~iILI<; J?i~g ~ Seni~r Planner ,V
Enclosure "
'. -: cc:
". '.". .' -,". . .:
Ciiy ofRe~tOri 'Ai~ort/Ow'n;;r(s)::
, Bob Rivilyl Party of Record
.... ,
" ~ ."
,:,' .
", .. ~ ".
.'
".,,'
l.
•
August 29, 2007
Washirigton State
· Department of Ecology
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olyrripia, W A ,!8504-7703
Environmental Deteimina'tion
CIT~OFR:ENTON
Plaiming/BuildinglPublicWorks Department •
. GreggZiminermao P.E., Adnihiistrator
· Transmitted herewith is a copy of the En~ironmental Detenninatiori forthefollowirig.project n~viewe<!by ..
· the Environmental Review Committee (ERCj on August 27,2007:' ,', . . ., ".. . ,.,' .
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE "MITIGATED'
. ,
PROJEct NAME: . ' Ai~port Soil Re";ediatlon. '.
PROJECT NUMBER: .. LlJAOM81, SME;'ECF"
, LOCATION: . 61.6 W Perimeter Road .. ' , "'.' .
DESCRIPTION: The,:appUcant ,Jias-request~d E.nvh'onmental . (SEPA)Revie~-:ind-a.
Shoreli~eExemption foithe, removal Of C(lIitamlnate!l.solI at thellenton Municipal' Akport. .. T.wo .•
. . areas arepr?posedto:be'exca~ated tiithe,~ater ta,bl,\{~ppro.xhi"iteiy 5 ,t~ 8.fe.e~~elow gra~ej;-oneto. . ..
the north of,the'f-Hangar'and ,theothe~,:to'theeast :of the. 'f-Hangar. It Is estimated.that .'.
approximately 1,300 cubic yards of.~';l1ta!nhiaieds'oih~iil be rer;,oved from the site: Once the ,soli Is .
. removed,:the site win Iiebac'kfilled ~ith-cleaD;.cimip:iCied·fiUm:iterialand 'overlying pa\>em'ent; The "
projectsiie'Is locateilwithirithe200:f6oi 'shoreline· buffer of the'Cedar River;The Cedar River Is.
'designated as an' Urban Envi .. onme~t at tliis,lodtion; .:.,".: . . .," . ..' ..,...., '
'. '. : -. . ,.' '.~ :'-'.,' '. -, . " .. ,'j:'> '~.;.;' ", .:::::.. ':, ~'., ,c,'
,': .
" , ," : ,~ .,' i" .,", ,..,., •• ', ' < ",'''.' " , • '. _ _ " " "
Appealso(the environmental defe~mln'ation .must b.e filed-in'writingonor'before 5:00' PM. on' .....". ".
September 18, 2007 .. Appealshlu~tbefil~oinwritingtogetherwith.tlie·required $75:00 ~pplicationfee, .. '
. ~ith: Hearing Examiner, City ofReiiton;J055.South Gr~dYWay, R~nto~,;WA98057. Appeals to ,tlie ;.
. Examiner are gcivem.ed by· City 0 f R~ntcin Municipal' (;o.oe Sec,iion4"8::l1.o:J>. .Addiiionalinforrnation.
, . ,regarding the appealprocessmf\Y be'obtlilriedfii:lri1'the ~~riton.City cierk'sOffice,'( 425)430,6510:. . ...•
....
. , Ify~~have question;,pi~asecalf ihe:at(425) 430~ 7219:
.... "
. ;"
, . For theEnviroOirient~1 Review. Corrllnitte~, .' . ::"" .:, .. '
-, .;'
:. )',"
:. 0,':'
" '''-'
~.' .'
.....
. 1." " " •..
King County Wastewater Tie.atment Division.
WDFW, stewart Reinbold" ..
. David F. 'Dietzman, D';paitmeni of Nattinil Resources
'. .WSDOT,NorthwestRegion .' .... . .' '. .
Karen Waiter, Fisheiies,Muckieshooi IndianTrilie(Ordinance)
.. --' ' .
• '<' '. i."
.: --' . , '
'. -Mellssa Calvert; Muckleshooi'C':uituralR.esQurces Pr~gram' .
.,-' .~E ... n~_I_o~su..-r ... e..;· _-'--'-~-'--".--'-'-"--,~-'-''-'''L' ~':""-'-...,..,-"..;' ',;.' -'-"'-'-'-....... ",' '-,,--,-.:...:.-,-~' ..;', ••.. ~ .. ' .
1055 South GmdYW~y~Re~t~n,\Vasllingt()n.?8057 .,.. "R ENT 0 N
, . , '.~. ·$~nl;s~pa·~r~~i~'~,~oo/.;,~~~~i~~I::3~iopo~t~su~er:: . ·A~~~D· OF THE:'C~'~'v-~
;;'.
'.~ ,
,' ....
," .
',". '. .... ,
.;,'
'. '.;. '. ....... .......</ ....... ·.·CiTYOFREf'JTON. • '" .' ,', .: .. ..
·.OETERNIINATIPN .OFNON:SIGt:-:IIFICANCE"MITIGATED,
MITIGATI.bN ,IvIEASURi:S '. "
" .. " APPLICATIONNO(Sj:' . . , .. ~
,lUA-07-081; SME, E'CF . ., '. . w '.
'. ," APPLICANt CarFBiiGh;The Boeing.Co ..
.: ',;', ·'PROJECJ.NAME:·
"
. : Airport Soil Remediation
. ,,' . , .' .
:.'
"',: " .. '
-,';.: ,.
'OE.SCRIP:nQN OF PRqPOSAL:, . The applicant ~as requeste-d En\drorlfi1ental(SEPA)Reyi~w and!!.'
,.Shore.line.Ex.empti9hJOr. ,\~e'removal.6f. cqntaniihated .soil at .!heRenton Mun,icipal Airpoit:TwO' areas ,are ":: ..
propose~t9.beexcavatedt9 tliewatertabl!) (approximately 5 tei 8f¢et beloiNgrade),onetothe.n6rth·o~\heF ' .• ", '
,' .. Hangar.and tne other ito th~, east; ofth.e· T-Hangar.: It is. estimated . ihat approximately Oo6:'culiicyards:of~"'_
'.' contaminated soil wHl'beremoved frornthesite.'Orice th'e soW is removed, the site will be backfilleifwith:ciilim, , ..... .
co",pactedfill:~ateria}and:Q~erlyingpa\ie,ment. The prciject si.ie is located.withinil'ie:290,foeilshOreline 9uffero( : ....•.
"thegedarRiver.·Jhe. CecJar:River,isdes,ignated as an Urban ,Environment at this location:' '.;: '"
L06ATION~~PR6~oSA~:61'6W'P~;i~~ter Roa~ ,j .'
. ' '. '. ...... : ... '.,; .. ' .,.'. .. ,,~,: ··'LEADAGENCY: '.':
'. ,. . , '" '-:'j ... ,:i:i.
;':;: ,'. ::. ...... ".; .
'';:,
I, .
: " ." .
", ~ . " ,~:,."
< .....
. ::':':"
",' -"; ;,,"
... .' ','r,
: .. ;
"'. ,','
.... ,
,/.'
, .
,. ~.
,. ,' . . , ....
. : .",.;
",.,: ;,';'. ;".,
,"' , ..... !' ..
. . ,".
, ,".
":"':.".'. "
,/ .
. . • ';:CIT~OF RE~~ON.;. . .
", '.
'. DETERMINATION OFNON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED,
.... ..... .ADYISORY NOTES','
APPLICATION NO(~(
APPu'CA~T: .
PRciJEC;NAM~: .. ,
. , .'~,"
LUA'07,081; SME,'ECF ." . , '. .".
.' ". " .. ;: ..
.~ , .
Carl Bach, The Bo~ing Co ...... '
Airport~dnRem~diatiori •. ",
c' .~,
. ~, '
",.:' .
'" .:
DESqRI PTIPN OF j:iROPqSAl.,:·,' '" .... The applicant· hasreqlJested~rivironmental( SEI' A) Review arid.' a
Shoreline '. Exe}nptiCln .f.or 'the. removaL6f. contaminated' sOjl.at. the. Rentori}Aunic;ipal Airport .. .' Twp 'areas'. are·
': proposed to be excavated to, tbewateqable(approxiniately5 \0 8 feet belbwgrade),.one tathe north. of· the T,
'Hangar:and the ottiertothe' eastof~ttie T~Hilligar,lt-is estirnated' thatappro)(imately:'OOO' cUbic yards ,of
. : contaminated.soilwill. be removedfromJhe site:Ohce the soil :isremoved;the site will be. backfilled 'with' clean,
·comp/lc.ted'fill,material,'andoverIYing·:pa;:ement.The,project.~ite.is·locat~d\Yi!hil)ihe 200-f6btshorelinebuffer of
, .. :"" . • ,the' Cedar RiveLTheCedar.River.isdesign'!ted?s ariUrtJanErlVironrnentatthi\, ·Iocation. . ..,..'.
. -'" .. '.' " , .. ' .... ' .: .. ' .... ,' "':,' ,; .'. '. -"". > -.. . "
.'-::' . LOCATION. OF PROPOSAL' ,
'" . , '\":
, < '-., ..:lE!\D j\GEt-.lCY::
,', "
,: ... -.:
;·/if.:.Fire.·
:::.:: ::·,j.'.NoMe·'.::··:.:·,
"
.:~I~.n}~eview: .
';1:.: None
..•..
.,"
'._;: _.' J
~'"
". ,,~. ,).; ~ .. ; .'
.•.. -.
-' .. ' ,-, ."
616 W Perimeter Road
.. :.:,." '. ":-.
,'.' '''.;
, -.. '
" '( .... ~. "
, . :. ' .
·>.·SuilClirici,. '. " . .'.
./ .
'-;.,' 1:.Agr~di~~.lice~S~iS'reql.Jiredio~thEipro~O~ed\Vot~:· ........• .........:-.. ~ .' .' .' "
" :','<' .'>: .. :.', ,:", ,;,:-._:' "._ " ",,\ ,','"-;: ~ >." ":'.'.' "'>,' " .... ,:-.' _. " -7 ~,". '::: .. _:-,. :" > :' •• '-. : ... ::-:-•• '._,>' ":':. : _. .' ..... ,: '-.'
,,"'.
. . . .'. .'
" ,';', .': " ;,'<>: .... '.
'. -;
.. , -' ,
.'.,.
"'. ,.. i '( '. '
-:-..
.' .. ' ,'':
':" ' : :':-........
'" .. '
,'. '
". 2: '.' A fill sO.LircEl stateinentis 'requiredlo,becor'npletedJorthe fill 10ge b[oughtin; .,,'.< ....
. ,~-" :,:; .. , (:' '. ,:. " >' .... ,. '-. .." '-.-'" ,.'. -. -\.': " .. '-,' -.
':-.
.. , .
'e-l
.'.
." , . '-.
.. : ~ ..
. ,,-::;,
'_1_'
"'.'
',",'
' .. , ... -' . .
: .. ,-.:;:.. -. ".' '.,,,':'><
',' ... '
. ,-.":.,:: "',: j'
',~ : .. ;
" .',
'. ~' '.
, . .'/~ ':';,'" -
" . ~ '-,< .
'.,-
". :." ': ".'
". :.-~ '. ' '", ,. t . "",
" ,.:." ;." ',,-.
, '-,;" ....
. ,'.
",.' .
-,..' ,
-?'
. ,'~.:'
. , i;
• !',
-: ';i-,···' '.
':;'.:;:;':
:. ,
' .. :, i .:, ". ....
--" ",.' \', .. ;···.i~R9t~,vl~?r/N;o,t~$ .• · ..... .
.. :/:~: ':.'-' ,"
-," ,. ".>
. /
"',,'
, T"
'.:. ';
'.
' ... , ", \:""
Pagel'of1 . ,., ,.' "".', .
• • CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
(MITIGATED)
APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-07-081, SME, ECF
APPLICANT: Carl Bach, The Boeing Co.
PROJECT NAME: Airport Soil Remediation
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Environmental (SEPA) Review and a
Shoreline Exemption for the removal of contaminated soil at the Renton Municipal Airport. Two areas are
proposed to be excavated to the water table (approximately 5 to 8 feet below grade), one to the north of the T-
Hangar and the other to the east of the T -Hangar. It is estimated that approximately 1,300 cubic yards of
contaminated soil will be removed from the site. Once the soil is removed, the site will be backfilled with clean,
compacted fill material and overlying pavement. The project site is located within the 200-foot shoreline buffer of
the Cedar River. The Cedar River is designated as an Urban Environment at this location.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
LEAD AGENCY:
616 W Perimeter Road
The City of Renton
Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
Development Planning Section
The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c).
Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of
Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified
during the environmental review process.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on September 18, 2007,
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton,
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code
Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's
Office, (425) 430-6510.
PUBLICATION DATE:
DATE OF DECISION:
SIGNATURES:
Gfegg Zimmerman, Administrator
Planning/Building/Public Works
Terry Higashiyama, Administrator
Community Services
September 1, 2007
August 27,2007
Chief Date
~~~~,
Ie ietsch, Admini trator Da~
EDNSP
• •
,
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
MEETING NOTICE
"August 27, 2007
To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator
Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator
I. David Daniels, Fire Chief
Alex Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator
From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning
Meeting Date: ,Monday, August 27,2007
Time: .3:00 PM
Location: Sixth Flbor Conference Room #620
Agenda listed below.
THE FOLLOWING IS A CONSENT AGENDA
Harper Engineering on 7'h (Higgins!
LUA07-077, SA-A, ECF
The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval of a proposed new
structure with associated parking. The 2.22 acre property is currently used as a landscaped and paved parking area.
The 20,700 sf building would be used as an office I laboratory and manufacturing facility.
Airport Soil Remediation (Ding!
LUA07-0B1, SME, ECF
The applicant has requested Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Shoreline Exemption for the removal of
contaminated soil at the Renton Municipal Airport. Two areas are proposed to be excavated to the water table
(approximately 5 to 8 feet below grade), one to the north of the T-Hangar and the other to the east of the T-Hangar. It
is estimated that approximately 1,300 cubic yards of contaminated soil will be removed from the site. Once the soil is
removed, the site will be backfilled with clean, compacted fill material and overlying pavement. The project site is
located within the 200-foot shoreline buffer of the Cedar River. The Cedar River is designated as an Urban
Environment at this location.
cc: K. Keolker, Mayor
J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
S. Dale Estey, EDNSP Director ®
C. Walls, Fire Prevention
N. Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director ®
F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner
M. Peterson, Fire Prevention ®
J. Medzegian, Council
P. Hahn, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director
R. Lind, Economic Development
L. Warren, City Attorney ®
,----------------------.----------------------------------------------------------------------
STAFF
REPORT
A. BACKGROUND
ERC MEETING DA TE
Project Name:
Owner:
Applicant/Contact:
File Number:
Project Manager:
Project Description:
Project Location:
Exist. Bldg. Area gsf:
Site Area:
RECOMMENDA TlON:
Project Location Map
• •
City of Renton
Department of Planning / Building / Public Works
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT
August 27, 2007
Airport Soil Remediation
City of Renton, Clayton Scott Field, 616 W Perimeter Road, Renton, WA 98055
Carl Bach, The Boeing Co., PO Box 3707, MCIW-12, Seattle, WA 98124
LUA-07-081, ECF, SME
Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner
The applicant has requested Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Shoreline Exemption
for the removal of contaminated soil at the Renton Municipal Airport. Two areas are
proposed to be excavated to the water table (approximately 5 to 8 feet below grade),
one to the north of the T -Hangar and the other to the east of the T -Hangar. It is
estimated that approximately 1,300 cubic yards of contaminated soil will be removed
from the site. Once the soil is removed, the site will be backfilled with clean, compacted
fill material and overlying pavement. The project site is located within the 200-foot
shoreline buffer of the Cedar River. The Cedar River is designated as an Urban
Environment at this location. (Project description continued on page 2).
616 W Perimeter Road (parcel no. 0723059007)
N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area: N/A
108,200 square feet Total Building Area gsf: N/A
Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of
ERe rpl 07-081.doc
• •
PROJECT DESCRIPTION CONTINUED:
The proposal is to clean up contaminated soil at the former South Fire Training Area (SFTA) located at the Renton
Municipal Airport. The proposed work would occur approximately 0.4 miles south of Lake Washington and 80 feet west
of the Cedar River.
After conducting soil testing, two areas at the FSFTA were identified where the soil sample results exceeded MTCA
Method A cleanup levels. The larger area is at the north end of the Hangar building. Samples collected in this area
contained volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH)-
gasoline range, TPH-diesel range, semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), and chromium above MTCA A cleanup
levels. The approximate extent of the affected area is 80 feet by 110 feet, extending approximately 60 feet north of the
hangar building, and extending west onto the runway to the edge of the grass and approximately 20 feet east of the
east side of the hangar building.
The smaller affected soil area is on the east side of the hangar building, approximately 75 feet south of the north end
of the building. Samples collected in this area contained TPH-gasoline range and TPH-diesel range above MTCA A
cleanup levels. The approximate extend of the affected area is 90 feet long and 25 feet wide, extending along the east
side of the hangar building. This area does not appear to be related to the FAFTA release. Samples collected at
locations inside of the hangar building did not exceed cleanup levels; therefore, this affected area is presumed to not
extend beneath the hangar building.
The affected soil will be removed to the extent practicable, given the presence of utilities, potential effects on existing
buildings and/or structures, and the stability of the excavation. It is estimated that about 1,300 cubic yards of soil will
be excavated. Soils will be excavated to the water table, which is expected to be encountered at a depth of 5-8 feet
below ground level. Once the soils have been removed, the excavation will be backfilled with clean fill material and the
overlying pavement will be replaced.
B. RECOMMENDA TION
Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials
make the following Environmental Determination:
DETERMINA TION OF
NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period.
Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period
with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period.
C. MITIGA TION MEASURES
DETERMINA TlON OF
XX NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGA TED.
XX Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period.
Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period
with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period.
1. Work shall immediately cease and the Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation
shall be contacted at (360) 586-3065 if any archeological artifacts are discovered during earthwork activities.
D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those
project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental
regulations.
1. Earth
Impacts: The topography of the project site is flat with a maximum slope of approximately 2 percent. The applicant
indicates that the soils underlying the project site are gravelly to silty sand and silts.
The project would require excavation of approximately 1,300 cubic yards of contaminated soil, which would be
replaced with clean structural fill from a commercial source. Once the area is backfilled, road base would be placed,
and it would be paved with structural concrete or asphalt to match the existing surface.
Excavation would be completed using a backhoe, excavator, or other means, and soil will be properly managed on
site prior to off-site disposal. Excavated soil will be placed directly in roll-off boxes or trucks, or stockpiled on a
constructed pad. Efforts would be made to place excavated material directly into roll-off boxes or trucks and removed
Project Location Map ERe rpl or·081.doc
City of Renton PIB/PW Department.
Airport Soil Remediation
REPORT AUGUST 27, 2007
•
onmentaf Review Committee Staff Report
LUA-07-081, ECF, SME
Page 3 of4
from the site, If a constructed soil stockpile pad is needed, it will be fabricated out of 30-mil polyethylene sheeting,
lumber, sand bags, and other appropriate materials. The lumber would be used to construct berms to minimize spills
and runoff or runon. When the excavation is not active, the stockpiles soils would be covered by 6-mil polyethylene
tarps to minimize rainfall infiltration and erosion. The covering tarp would be secured at the end of the working day
with sand bags or other weights. Any water draining from stockpiled soils would be collected and containerized for
proper disposal.
The applicant indicates that erosion control Best Management Practices would be implemented during construction
per the Boeing Renton Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is recommended.
Nexus: N/A
2. Water -Stormwater
Impacts: The excavation is proposed to be conducted in compliance with the general stormwater permit for
construction sites. The excavation methods would be designed to limit stormwater contact with contaminated soil and
prevent runoff of any rainfall which has contacted exposed soil. Examples of Best Management Practices,
preventative measures, and project controls to be implemented include: filter fabric placed in stormwater catch basins
in the area, activities not conducted if raining, placement of excavated material in covered shipping container or
placed on plastic sheeting, covered with plastic sheeting to prevent contact with rainwater, and bermed to prevent
runon and/or runoff.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is recommended.
Nexus: N/A
3, Archeology
Impacts: According to the applicant, previous extensive excavations have occurred on the Renton Municipal Airport
site and have not uncovered any archeologically significant sites. However, the applicant indicates that if
archeological artifacts are uncovered during project excavation, work would be halted pending notification and
response from the appropriate agencies. A letter was received from the Washington State Department of Archeology
(DAHP) and Historic Preservation stating that the project has the potential to disturb intact subsurface archeological
resources. To prevent any disturbance of the potential resources, the DAHP requests an archeological survey of the
site prior to any work commencing.
Due to the extent of development that has occurred previously on the project site and the likelihood that the soils on-
site have been previously disturbed, staff does not recommend that the applicant conduct an archeological survey in
advance of the work being conducted. Staff recommends a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to contact the
Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation at (360) 586-3065 and that work be halted
immediately if any archeological artifacts are discovered during project excavation.
Mitigation Measures: Work shall immediately cease and the Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic
Preservation shall be contacted at (360) 586-3065 if any archeological artifacts are discovered during earthwork
activities.
Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations
E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS
The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where
applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or
Notes to Applicant .
....L Copies of a/l Review Comments are contained in the Official File.
Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report.
Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be
filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 18, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the
required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057.
Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information
regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
ERC rpt 07·0B1.doc
City of Renton PIBIPW Department.
Airport Soit Remediation
REPORT AUGUST 27. 2007
Advisory Notes to Applicant:
.onmental Review Committee Staff Report
LUA-07-081, ECF, SME
Page 4 014
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental
determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal
process for environmental determinations.
Planning
1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise
approved by the Development Services Division.
2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to
the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on
Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work
shall be permitted on Sundays.
Fire
1. None
Plan Review
1. None
Building
1. A grading license is required for the proposed work.
2. A fill source statement is re uired to be com leled for the fill to be brou ht in.
ERG rpt 07-081.doc
i , ,
o
=
-
~ z
~ z c;
~
",!! ;g
o
~
--"'.s
~ ~
"""" ~ . ~ " .
~
n m o > " " <. m
" '" ~ m
" '" > -<
:;c:f':: Geomatrix
==
Geornatl'tx Consultanta, Inc.
eoo UnIVersity Sbwt
Suite 1020
Seattle, W • .ttlngton 88101
IF 9 £ [
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 0
D
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o 0
C 8
G D
a 0
"" .., "" Af'IIROXIMATE SCAlE IN fEET
~~I::I~ORHOOO DETAIL MAP
~jUl2 7
RECEtVED
CEDAR RIveR
•
OQllIw...~
ttlGH l'VA'fER
,
'0. , ,
• , , ,
,
'"
r---''""O---\
-r I
88.00
APPROxtMATE
STOCKPILE
AREA
•
'" ,
A~" 19.48'0
,
.
•
~
.L--
\ ~
,
"""""'" -
,
,
,
•
PROPOSED
EXCAVATION
AREA
, •
•
• ----.!::!....-s.
...." ~
"""'" ~
"""" ""
,
, , , , .
, ,
I , , u,
!!I , , ,
PROPOSED
EXCAVATION
AREA
----z-~:;~ L.-
91.31
'-----l
--~-----
,
,
, , , , ,
, , ,
01 T ~HANGAR
M " , ,
, , , , , ,
----~
, , , ,
, , , , , , ,
-Z-~~L-
u' h' " ,
. , , '
"
0 19.49'
, .
,.. ... f '" NOTE;
\ , ,
ALL DIMENSIONS IN FEET
~Geomatrix
Oeomatrlx Consurtanta, Inc. eoo Unmr.1ty StrMt
Sufbt102Q
s.m" Washington 98101
, , , ,
,
.-
_________ LL----------
, , ,
EROSION CONTROl BERM DETAIL
SECTlONJo..A'
LEGEND
@l CATCHBAStN
o SPOT ElEVATION
~ EXCAVATION AREAS
c=J lANDSCAPED AREAS
19.]0'
o
~!.tt
EXCAVATION AT UTlLnY PlPEUNE DETAIL
SECTIONB-B'
.. ~
~TEsc.o.!.ElNF£ET
RECEIVED
CA
IMCP)
IMCP)
ZONING
pJBJPW TECHNICAL SBIlV1CB8
0ZIW07
UC-N2
ILCP)
F3 • 18 T23N R5E E 112 o BOO pO E3 -. -----Renton dtt,. UmlUi "'4.aoo
7 T23N R5E.E
ING MAP 80
RESIDENTIAl
~ Re.ource Con.ervation
~ RlllldenUal I dulac
~ RalidenU.l • du/ae
~ ReaidanU.l B dulac
~ Residential Manufactured Home.
I R-IO I Residential 10 dulac
IIH.(j Re.ldential " dulac
I RM-rl Residential MulU-Famlly
!RH-T I HealdeDU_l Multi-family Traditional
IRH-ul RII.ldenUal Multi-Family Urban Cenler-
Printed by Print & Mall Services, City of Renton
MIXED liSE CENTER
~ Center vm..,e
lut-NII Urban Center -North
IUC-N21 Urban Cenler -North
@] Center DoWIltown·
2
I ,0< I Commereial/Otrice/RealdenUal
I::!JHMEBCI61
0 Commercial Arterial-
[ill Commercial Office-
0 Commerelal Nel,hborhood
INDllSTIDU
~ Indultrial -Hea.,.
o Indu.trial -Medium
[!f] Industrial -LI,bt
(P) Publicly owned
_~ __ Renton City Umlte
-_._ Adjacent City Limite
_ Book Pale. Boundary
KROLL PAGE
• Wa,. include Overlay Dlatrlcts. See Appendb:
mapa. Fol'" additional re,uiatioDI in O"eriay
DialriC!ta. ple.le .'HI RMC "-3.
PAGE# INDEX
City oftton Department of Planning I Building I pUbl_orks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~u \( D6\J COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 21, 2007
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-081, SME, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 7,2007
APPLICANT: The Boeinq Company PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dinq
PROJECT TITLE: Airport Soil Remediation PLAN REVIEW:
SITE AREA: 108,200 square feet BUILDING AREA (qross): N/A
LOCATION: 616 W Perimeter Road I WORK ORDER NO: 77788
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Shoreline Exemption for the removal
of contaminated soil at the Renton Municipal Airport. Two areas are proposed to be excavated to the water table (approximately 5 to 8
feet below grade), one to the north of the T-Hanagar and the other to the east of the T-Hanagar. It is estimated that approximately
1,300 cubic yards of contaminated soil will be removed from the site. Once the soil is removed, the site will be backfilled with clean,
compacted fill material and overlying pavement. The project site is located within the 200-foot shoreline buffer of the Cedar River. The
Cedar River is designated as an Urban Environment at this location.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housin
Air Aesthetics
Water Li ht/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use utilities
Animals Trans rlation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed 0 properly assess this proposal.
t
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date , I
.---------------------------------------------------------------
•
STATE OF WASHINGTON
-----_. --------------------,
AUG 14 2{l07
RECEiVED
DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION
1063 S. Capitol Way, Suite 106 • ,Olympia, Washington 98501
Mailing address: PO Box 48343 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8343
(360) 586-3065 • Fax Number (360) 586-3067 • Website: www.dahp.wa.gov
August 10, 2007
Ms. Jill Ding
Senior Planner
Development Services Division
1055 South Grady Way
RentonIW N98057
In future correspondence please refer to:
Log: 081007-l7-KI
Property: LUA07-08l Renton Airport Soil Remediation
Re: Archaeology -Survey Requested
Dear Ms. Ding: .' ,
We have reviewed the materials forwarded to our office for the proposed project referenced above. The
area has:thepoii,ntiill for iniact subsurface archaeological resources, and given the extent of the planned
~oil:r~ih<ival ike recommend that a professional archaeological survey of the project area to include
~6bsuHiice'iesting be condu6tedprior to ground disturbing activities. Identification during construction is
rioril re'c'Omm6nded detection method because inadvertent discoveries often result in costly construction
delays and damage to the resource. We also recommend consultation with the concerned Tribes' cultural
committees and staff regarding cultural resource issues.
If any federal funds or permits are involved Section J06 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as
amended, and its implementing regulations, 36CFR800, must be followed. This is a separate process
from SEP A and requires formal government-to-government consultation with the affected Tribes and this
agency.
These comments are based on the information available at the time of this review and on behalf of the
State Historic Preservation Officer. Should additional information become available, our assessment may
be revised. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project and we look forward to receiving
the survey report. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (360) 586-3088 or
Scott.Williams@dahp.wa.gov.
CC: Laura Murphy, Muckleshoot Tribe
City of Ion Department of Planning / Building / PUblictrks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ai roort-COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 21, 2007
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-081, SME, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 7, 2007
APPLICANT: The Boeing Comoanv PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding
PROJECT TITLE: Airport Soil Remediation PLAN REVIEW:
SITE AREA: 108,200 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): NIA
LOCATION: 616 W Perimeter Road I WORK ORDER NO: 77788
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Shoreline Exemption for the removal
of contaminated soil at the Renton Municipal Airport. Two areas are proposed to be excavated to the water table (approximately 5 to 8
feet below grade), one to the north of the T-Hanagar and the other to the east 01 the T-Hanagar. It is estimated that approximately
1.300 cubic yards of contaminated soil will be removed from the site. Once the soil is removed, the site will be backfilled with clean,
compacted fill material and overlying pavement. The project site is located within the 200-loot shoreline buffer of the Cedar River. The
Cedar River is deSignated as an Urban Environment at this location.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) .COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Earth
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C.
More
Information
Necessary
Element of the
Environment
Housin
Aesthetics
Liqht/Glare
Recreation
Utilities
Transportation
Public ServiCeS
Historic/Cultural
Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
'More
Information
Necessary
We have reVle"d thf; apPlicatl0r:A~~cUlar attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or
areas w~L.lf.JfV'ed 10 properly assess Ihls proposal ~~
Signature 01 )i~r or "\1, d Representative -~ Date
---------------------------------------_._---
City orlnton Department of Planning / Building / pUbl-orks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'Wk:£ COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 21, 2007 ,..,
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-081, SME, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 7, 2007 ~o ~
APPLICANT: The Boeing Company PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding ~::<! ~ n
PROJECT TITLE: Airport Soil Remediation PLAN REVIEW: :::;!; tn
SITE AREA: 108,200 square feet BUILDING AREA (qross): NIA ~~ ~ ;;?
<0 <=> '1m LOCATION: 616 W Perimeter Road WORK ORDER NO: 77788 nZ -.I
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Shoreline ExemptiW, for the re~al
of contaminated soil at the Renton Municipal Airport, Two areas are proposed to be excavated to the water table (approximately 5 to 8
feet below grade), one to the north of the T-Hanagar and the other to the east of the T-Hanagar. It is estimated that approximately
1,300 cubic yards of contaminated soil will be removed from the site, Once the soil is removed, the site will be backfilled with clean,
compacted fill material and overlying pavement The project site is located within the 200-foot shoreline buffer of the Cedar River. The
Cedar River is designated as an Urban Environment at this location,
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element afthe Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals
~
=i
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
:~:~~~:et
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional informatio is needed to properly assess this proposal.
City of Iton Department of Planning I Building I pUblilorks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Vim Merv, (-:u \ COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 21, 2007
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-081, SME, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 7, 2007
APPLICANT: The Boeing Company PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding RECEIVED
PROJECT TITLE: Airport Soil Remediation PLAN REVIEW: A lit! n R ?nO?
SITE AREA: 108,200 square feet BUILDING AREAjgross): NIA
LOCATION: 616 W Perimeter Road I WORK ORDER NO: 77788
BUILDING Dly.v,v.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Shoreline Exemption for the removal
of contaminated soil at the Renton Municipal Airport. Two areas are proposed to be excavated to the water table (approximately 5 to 8
feet below grade), one to the north of the T-Hanagar and the other to the east of the T-Hanagar. It is estimated that approximately
1,300 cubic yards of contaminated soil will be removed from the site. Once the soil is removed, the site will be backfilled with clean,
compacted fill material and overlying pavement. The project site is located within the 200-foot shoreline buffer of the Cedar River. The
Cedar River is designated as an Urban Environment at this location.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housin
Air Aesthetics
Water Li htiGlare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
f'V~
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
City of Iton Department of Planning / Building / pUbl.orks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: T rei "...::.r"'r-fz:t1-i't\r) COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 21, 2007 .
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-081, SME, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 7,2007
APPLICANT: The Boeing Compa"Y_ PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding
R ;:!1;:"U~H~~~,uE~_ PROJECT TITLE: Airport Soil Remediation PLAN REVIEW: I: L I: I V : U
SITE AREA: 108,200 square feet BUILDING AREA (qross): N/A • ". ft"
I MUO U I L.UUt
LOCATION: 616 W Perimeter Road WORK ORDER NO: 77788
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Shor~M!!-~,lIiIIrlJilbVi:fllPtNe removal
of contaminated soil at the Renton Municipal Airport. Two areas are proposed to be excavated to the water table (approximately 5 to 8
feet below grade), one to the north of the T-Hanagar and the other to the east of the T-Hanagar. It is estimated that approximately
1,300 cubic yards of contaminated soil will be removed from the site. Once the soil is removed, the site will be backfilled with clean,
compacted fill material and overlying pavement. The project site is located within the 200-foot shoreline buffer of the Cedar River. The
Cedar River is designated as an Urban Environment at this location.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airporl Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feel
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
IV~
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
f\J~
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
~-----------------
City of Iton Department of Planning / Building / pUblilorks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: c..c:lns~-n ,lc;f-i i;lYl
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-081, SME, ECF
APPLICANT: The Boeinq Company
PROJECT TITLE: Airport Soil Remediation
SITE AREA: 108.200 square feet
LOCATION: 616 W Perimeter Road
COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 21, 2007
DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 7, 2007
PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding
PLAN REVIEW:
BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A
WORK ORDER NO: 77788
-l'iufH€Nf0N
RECEIVtU
AII(; n 7.11l1l1.."'---_
,,.,
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Shoreline Exempti; for the removal
of contaminated soil at the Renton Municipal Airport, Two areas are proposed to be excavated to the water table (approximately 5 to 8
feet below grade). one to the north of the T-Hanagar and the other to the east of the T-Hanagar. It is estimated that approximately
1.300 cubic yards of contaminated soil will be removed from the site, Once the soil is removed. the site will be backfilled with clean.
compacted fill material and overlying pavement. The project site is located within the 200-foot shoreline buffer of the Cedar River. The
Cedar River is designated as an Urban Environment at this location.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element o( the Probable
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts
Earth Housina
Air Aesthetics
Water Li htlGlare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
~~~~~.
{2fi~~,.z:-'p<-~,
Probable More
Major Information
Impacts Necessary
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas wher dditionaf information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
City of Inton Department of Planning / Building / pUbl.orks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1= i re.-COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 21, 2007
DATE CIRCULATED: AU ITIl3J APPLICATION NO: LUA07-081, SME, ECF
APPLICANT: The Boein~ Company PROJECT MANAGER: J :61~ ~Jl!1 _If; U riJ rr:: D
PROJECT TITLE: Airport Soil Remediation PLAN REVIEW:
SITE AREA: 108,200 square leet BUILDING AREA (~ros : ~I AUG -7 ?nm
LOCATION: 616 W Perimeter Road WORK ORDER NO: 71788 l....../
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Environmental (SEPA) Review ~ Shorlel~'aNMM/MIlor the rem val
01 contaminated soil at the Renton Municipal Airport. Two areas are proposed to be excavated to the water1atila.(aJ;ililliximately 5 to 8
leet below grade), one to the north 01 the T-Hanagar and the other to the east olthe T-Hanagar. It is estimated tha_,oo . tely
1,300 cubic yards 01 contaminated SOil will be removed Irom the site. Once the SOil IS removed, the site will be backfilled With clean,
compacted fill material and overlying pavement. The project site is located within the 200-foot shoreline buffer 01 the Cedar River. The
Cedar River is deSignated as an Urban Environment at this location.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable Mo ... Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy! Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources PreselVation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
a/Js wher~ additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
L4vz-< <'e.G WCLf?/?&) S -7 -0 7
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
• •
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF
NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M)
DATE:
LAND USE NUMBER:
PROJECT NAME:
August 7. 2007
LUA07-OS1, SME, ECF
All'j'Xlrt Soil RemediatIOn
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requesled Environmental (SEPAl Rev.ew and a Shoreline
Exempbon lor the removal of contaminated soil at the Renton Municipal Airport. Two areas are prOf'Osed to be excavated
to the waler table (approximately 5 to 61HI below grade), ons to the north of the T-Hanagar and the otller to the east 01
the T-Hanagar. It Is estimated thai approximately 1,300 cubic yards of contaminated soil will be removed from the 5lte.
Once the soil is removed. the site will be backfilled with clean, compacted fill material and overlYing pavement The project
sita is located within the 200·jooj shoreline buffer of the Cedar River The Cedar River is deSignated as an Urban
Environment lit this location.
PROJECT LOCATION: 616 W Perimeter Road
OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-MJ: As the Lead Agency. the City of Rentan
hils determined tIlat significant environmental impacts are unl<kely to result from the proposed project Thereforl, 115
pefTTlrtted under thll RCW 43.21C. 110, the Crty of Renton is using Ihe Optional ONS-M process to give noilce Ihat a ONS-
M is Ilkety 10 be Issued. Comment periods for tile project and tha praposed ONS-M are integrated Inta a SIngle comment
period_ There will be no comment period following the issuance 01 the Threshold DeterminatIon of Non-SIgnfficanc.
Mlllgaled (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal penod WIll follow Ihe Issuance of \he DNS_M
PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: July 27. 2007
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: August 6. 2007
APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Carl Bich, The Boeing Company; Tal: (206) 898~38:
Em!: c.rI.m.b~ch@bo.lng.com
Permits/Review Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Shoreline Exemption
Olher Permit. which may be required: Grading License
Requnted Studies: Habitat Data Report
Location where appllcatlon may
be reviewed: PlannlnglBulldlnglPubllc Work. Department, Development Servlc.s
Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA
98057
PUBLIC HEARtNG; NIA
CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW:
ZonlnglLind Use:
Environmental Documents that
Evaluate the Proposed Project:
Dovelopment Regulations
Used For Project Mitigation:
The subject sIte IS desognaled MedIum IndU$tnal {1M) on the City of Renton
ComprehenSiVe Land Use Map and Employment Area -Industnal {EAI) on the
CIty'S Zoning Map
EnVironmental (SEPA) ChecklIst
The prOject WIll b~ subject to the Clty-s SEPA ordinance, RMC 4·4_030
Development GUidelines and RegulatIOns and other appliCable codes and
regulvlions as appropriate
Propo,ed Mitigation Measures: The Iollowing Mlti~ation Measures wililikety be imposed on the proposed project
These recommended Mltogahon Measures address project Impacts not covered
by eXisting codes and regulal>ons as Cited above
. ~r::,::::;a~;rdM~~~;~~nc;'~~~u:,r:;;~~,~~~~t~oro;t::,~,~~ ~~~;~~_OmpIY With the 2005 Depertment 01 Ecology
Comment5 on the abovo application must be Bubmlttod In writing to Jill Ding, Senior Planner, Development
Services DlvlBlo~, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on August 21, 2007. If yau have
quesllons about thiS proposal, or WIsh to bi! made a party of record ~nd receive additional notIfIcation by mnll. contact the
PrOject Manager Anyone who submIts written comments Will automatIcally become a parly of record and will be notified of
any deCISIon on thiS project
CONTACT PERSON: Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7382;
Ernl: jding@ci.renton.wa.U8
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
If you would like to be made e party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete
thiS form and return to: Crty of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057.
Name/File No. Airport Soil Remedlation/LUA07-081, SME, ECF
NAME
MAILING ADDRESS
TELEPHONE NO.
CERTIFICATION
I, .5t:'I1r klSJElZ-, , hereby certify that ., copies of the above docume~\"\"1
were posted by me in ---l-conspicuous places or nearby the described propert~I$~'I'104N ~~
::-~-: ~.ri;1Il..i!~I';~~ ~ ..:;.~ DATE: 'b7-P SIGNED: ' 1"1\>;. ,,),:~ -.,; '4!\ itI'.: , ~u _. _ V)~:r;
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residin~~ ""Vft\.fJ~~ I
t ~ /\ ~ , -1 ",a W 'Sb~ ,on the 7 ., dayof U" ~I' AJs "'~
: WAS""""
1\\\\\\""
,.;.:
\ • •
CITY OF RENTON
CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OFSERVICE BY MAILING
On the 7th day of August, 2007, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope
containing Acceptance Letter, Environmental Checklist, PMT's & NOA documents, This information
was sent to:
Agencies -Env, Checklist, PMT's, NOA
City of Renton -Airport -Accpt. Ur, NOA
Carl Bach, The Boeing Company -Accpt Ur
Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only
(Signature of Sender): 4a'tf ~,r
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS
COUNTY OF KING )
See Attached
Owner
Applicant/Contact
See Attached
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for th~~~ai>lflud
purposes mentioned in the instrument. ..:-....... ~>\",' .lo,..~11
$' ~ .. ;~··,;~\~~~~t·I-e,,~
Dated: 6-"-07 i _'A"I >~,~/~~
ton .P~~. - . -j ~
Notary (Pri nt) :---''---'c!':::::.L>''-I-_=-+'--.l..L..!_,-,-",-,-"-,-,-,--=--'+.'~,,,-,J!>i':I ...... !"",,\.,...f.> ~¥.f'lIFitE
My appointment expires: {;) -\q -\0 tll,-'li~I(~\-""~,~,,,,'" _
Airport Soil Remediation
LUA07-081, SME, ECF
template -affidavit of service by mailing
/11 OF wp..s ,..:0
11111\\\\,,""
Dept. of Ecology'
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
WSDOT Northwest Region'
AUn: Ramin Pazooki
King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240
PO Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
US Army Corp. of Engineers'
Seattle District Office
Attn: SEPA Reviewer
PO Box C-3755
Seattle, WA 98124
Jamey Taylor'
Depart. of Natural Resources
PO Box 47015
Olympia, WA 98504-7015
KC Dev. & Environmental Servo
Attn: SEPA Section
900 Oakesdale Ave. SW
Renton, WA 98055-1219
Metro Transit
Senior Environmental Planner
Gary Kriedt
• •
AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING
(ERe DETERMINATIONS)
WDFW -Stewart Reinbold' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. •
clo Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer
3190 160lh Ave SE 39015 _172" Avenue SE
Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092
Duwamish Tribal Office' Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program'
4717 W Marginal Way SW AUn: Ms Melissa Calvert
Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015172" Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092-9763
KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic
Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation*
Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer
201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343
Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343
City of Newcastle City of Kent
Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP
Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director
13020 SE 72" Place 220 Fourth Avenue South
Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895
Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila
Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official
Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd.
201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188
Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868
Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology
Real Estate Services NW Regional Office
Title Examiner 3190 160lh Avenue SE
700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452
PO Box 34018
Seattle, WA 98124-4018
Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and
cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application .•
Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send
her the ERC Determination paperwork.
template -affidavit of service by mailing
I
956480017006
601 RAINIER LLC
95 S TOBIN ST #201
RENTON WA 98055
413680019507
APPLIN RAINI A+POLLOCK NICHOLAS
V
8815 S 116TH PL
SEATILE WA 98178
420440021509
BARRON BRENT +CYNTHIA
310 HARDIE AVE NW
RENTON WA 98055
000720017904
BIRD GLORIA E
8722 S 121ST
SEATILE WA 98178
000720004100
BONNERPYUONG SU
C/O MONICA KLAU
2951 NE 34TH AVE
PORTLAND OR 97212
118000179002
BRYN MAWR PLAZA L L C
C/O PETER W. WONG ASSSOC INC
321 PARKPLACE SUITE 120
KIRKLAND WA 98033
420240150003
CHANG BROTHERS INC
6301 NE 204TH DR NE
REDMOND WA 98030
956480002503
CHIN SANDRA
670 TAYLOR AVE NW
RENTON WA 98055
000720004506
DAWSON JAMES D+RENEE E
10838 LAKE RIDGE DR S
SEATILE WA 98178
722930061501
F & K INVESTMENTS LLC
13810 152ND AVE SE
RENTON WA 98059
• 420440006609
ABBOTI ALBERT
8925 S 121ST ST
SEATILE WA 98178
413680020000
AWEE LLC
PO BOX 6423
BELLEVUE WA 98008
420440021004
BECKMAN CLAUDIA
17355 SE 134TH ST
RENTON WA 98059
072305904608
BOEING COMPANY THE
PROPERTY TAX DEPT
PO BOX 3707 M/C 20-00
SEATILE WA 98124
420440035509
BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS LLC
PO BOX 5015
BUENA PARK CA 90622
420440010007
BUCHAN BROTHERS INV PROPS
2630 116TH AVE NE #100
BELLEVUE WA 98004
000720011006
CHAU BILL +ANN
500 S TOBIN ST
RENTON WA 98055
420240150508
CHRISTOPHERSON R LEE
503 RAINIER AVE N
RENTON WA 98055
000720007806
DESPUIG ERLINDA D
416 S TOBIN ST
RENTON WA 98055
072305908500
FACILITIES & OPERATIONS CTR
OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIR
300 SW 7TH ST
RENTON WA 98055
• D1-'o'6\
~ , ~; 722930062509
ALLINGHAM WILLIAM D
PO BOX 48117
SEATILE WA 98148
420440022507
BARRON AUTO SALES
313 RAINIER AVE N
RENTON WA 98055
722930010003
BENZEL & YARNELL LLC
4532 160TH AVE SE
ISSAQUAH WA 98027
722930063507
BOLAND JAMES M
51 LOGAN AVE S
RENTON WA 98002
420440007003
BRYANT JEREMY R+JASON M
30811 SE 408TH ST
ENUMCLAW WA 98022
182305923704
BURKHEIMER FAMILY L.L.C THE
1326 5TH AVE STE 708
SEATILE WA 98101
000720015502
CHEN TOMMY & SHU-MEl H
8125 144TH AVE SE
NEWCASTLE WA 98059
118000028506
COLACURCIO WILLIAM
522 BOURBON ST
NEW ORLEANS LA 70130
000720003102
EDMAN BESSIE M
220 S TOBIN AVE
RENTON WA 98057
118000276501
FAKHARZADEH AMIR
11226 AUBURN AVE S
SEATILE WA 98178
722930002000
FATTORE ROBERT L
13810 152ND AVE SE
RENTON WA 98059
420440011500
GAVIN DANIEL G
100 NW 3RD PL
RENTON WA 98055
000720002906
HARPER ENGINEERING CO, INC
200 S TOBIN ST
RENTON WA 98055
420440012003
HOLM JOHN R
355 RAINIER AVE N
RENTON WA 98055
000720003805
JACQUES JAMES H
1216 N 38TH ST
RENTON WA 98056
000720003201
JPC PROPERTIES LLC
15826 SE 141ST ST
RENTON WA 98059
956480003105
KRUZICH BOYD WM+ANGELA M
257 QUINCY AVE NE
RENTON WA 98059
420240134007
LIME HILL LLC+MOSS ROAD LLC
222 20TH AVE
SEATTLE WA 98122
182305923407
MCDONALDS CORP 046-0017
PO BOX 182571
COLUMBUS OH 43218
413680021008
MT DEVELOPMENT LLC
11625 RAINIER AVE S #202
SEATTLE WA 98178
• 722930059505
FRASIER CHRISTINE
SEVERYNS WILLIAM
PO BOX 836
RENTON WA 98057
722930007009
GRAPHICS R & R
GUTHRIE RON & ROB
203 AIRPORT WAY S
RENTON WA 98055
000720003300
HEALY MARTIN+ANNE
314 S TOBIN ST
RENTON WA 98057
426820006002
HOLMS DANIEL E
HOARE J ANTHONY
2567 39TH AVE W
SEATTLE WA 98199
118000275503
JARVIS PATRICIA
PO BOX 1056
RENTON WA 98057
118000268508
KEMPER SANDY
10914 RAINIER AVE S
SEATTLE WA 98178
118000171504
LAKESHORE THE
1325 4TH AVE STE 211 0
SEATTLE WA 98101
420440007102
LOUIE ANGELA & DONNA
PO BOX 33594
PORTLAND OR 97292
956480017600
MILLER WAYNE A+DEBRA J
19611 SE 192ND ST
RENTON WA 98058
000720021401
NGUYEN TODD
18030 140TH CT SE
RENTON WA 98058
• 956480002602
GARCIA JOSE G
27925 133RD AVE SE
KENT WA 98042
118000028001
HARER J STEVE
11326 RAINIER AVE S
SEATTLE WA 98178
722930060008
HEITMAN-BODEN SANDRA
50 LOGAN AVE S
RENTON WA 98055
426820005509
HU MIAO DAN
212 OAKESDALE AVE SW
RENTON WA 98057
420240121004
lDA GROUP LLC&I D KLINE CO
C/O HOLMAN R/E SERVICES
95 S TOBIN ST #201
RENTON WA 98055
420440026102
KRANZ BRENT J + ROBIN A
271 RAINIER AVE N
RENTON WA 98055
413680020505
LE HUYEN CHI
16217 205TH PL SE
RENTON WA 98059
000720017102
LU DAT
665 PASCO PL
RENTON WA 98059
722930005508
MINKLER ROBERT l+ROBERT A
443 10TH AVE W
KIRKLAND WA 98033
000720016708
NICKELS PAUL M
1901 47TH AVE SW
SEATTLE WA 98116
118000279505
OSSES ROMILIO W
OSSES CONSTRUCTORS INC
12323 85TH AVE S
SEATTLE WA 98178
420440026300
POPE LACHLAN
21005 46TH AVE SE
BOTHELL WA 98021
722930063002
REYNOLDS GLENN D
55 LOGAN AVE
RENTON WA 98055
000720003003
SALVATION ARMY THE
111 QUEEN ANNE AVE N #300
SEATTLE WA 98109
000720003706
SMITH ROBERT C
402 S TOBIN ST
RENTON WA 98055
000720004308
STORWICK RICHARD ALLEN +FREY
CAROL JEAN
1510 9TH ST
ANACORTES WA 98221
182305900108
TONELLI TERESA
931 SW 296TH ST
FEDERAL WAY WA 98023
420440006807
VU HAl VAN
16020 SE 156TH ST
RENTON WA 98053
• 420240117507
PHAM TUNG
676 TAYLOR AVE NW
RENTON WA 98055
118000294009
PUBLIC STORAGE INC
DEPT-PT-WA-03034
PO BOX 25025
GLENDALE CA 91201
420240140004
RIVILY BOB
254 SENECA SENECA AVE NW
RENTON WA 98055
722930054506
SCHUMSKY DONALD W+MARGARET H
2019 JONES AVE NE
RENTON WA 98056
118000282004
SNYDER LEROY J& SANDRA D
1915 S 375TH ST
FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
413680024002
SUSON MARIO D
LANDON-SUSON JEAN
11613 RAINIER AVE S
SEATTLE WA 98178
420240125500
U-HAUL REAL ESTATE COMPANY
DBA U-HAUL CO I WESTERN WA
701.49
PO BOX 29046
PHOENIX AZ 85038
118000270504
WALKER JEFFREY L+WHITNEY P
8811 S 117TH ST
SEATTLE WA 98178
• 722930009005
PHILLIPS MANIO
613 S 16TH ST
RENTON WA 98055
722930038004
RAJARATNAM LESLIE J
21 LOGAN AVE S
RENTON WA 98055
420240142505
RIVILY ROBERT
254 SENECA AVE NW
RENTON WA 98055
722930051502
SDS PARTNERSHIP
ATTN: PANELLI KELLY A
8580 SE 76TH PL
MERCER ISLAND WA 98040
118000276006
SOUND DEVELOPMENT NW INC
PO BOX 78601
SEATTLE WA 98178
000720017607
TOBACCO THOMAS C+JANA
1701 LAKE AVE S
RENTON WA 98055
000720007905
VICERAL EZRA FELIAS+FLORENCE
VlLA-
418 S TOBIN ST
RENTON WA 98055
000720010800
YANG ANDREWLA N
502 S TOBIN ST
RENTON WA 98055
, ,
" '
"
, I,
1>"-•
"
, "
Ci;T~:F'RENTON
, , '
, Planning/Building/Public Works Department
, Renton Municipal Airport, Clayton Sco'tt Field
" -
Kathy Kcolker. ~ayor '. " .
.. ,',
, ,
'July II, 2007 c
JenrilferHenning
City of Rentoj1, ,
DevelopITient Services' ,
'1055, South Grady Way
'Renton, W A 98057,'
",
, " ~
,] , .
' ....
Subject: ,Permits for B~eing Fire Training Area Re'me,diation'
• " , '. >
,DearMs, Henning:
" '
~ ha~eb~en working \\,ith Carl B'ach ofth~ Boeing 90mpany for n~arly n'vo years to" '
'develop 'an'acceptable approach to the cleanup of contaminated soiI'srelated to the fornier
operation of-a ,Fire Training Arealocated on Renton Airport Property, '
, ;Tliisyear, Mr.-Bach and ~ agreed on an approach th~tinv'olves excavation andprop~r
, disposaJ, of effected soils located outside of the Cedar River Hangar buildings located qn '
'the east 'side of the airport facility, Boeing has secured funding for this environmental
" improvement project and would li15e to proceed with the w'ork inSept~inber 2007,', '
, • " • l •
,lhave met wi'th Mr. B~6h and his con,sultants, Geo~atdx Consultants,' to re~iew aspe~!s
': of the work that will im'pactmy facilitY.operation's and these, constraints have be~n
considered in the development of the Work Plan and Grading,Phin for the proposed
',project. . ' " , " ,
",
" '
, i ~~i1ld like this project to proce~d this year and ha~,e approv~iI said pi~ns creaied by
,Boeing and their consultant: Prior to conducting the actual.\\'ork, Boeinirand their
consultant hllve agreed to provide'me wiih a proj<;:Ct schedule and cther documents, ~'
necessary, so that I can coordinate these activities with airpoinenants:, '
,', .
, ,
, "
Pl~ise'l~t:mek~ow if you ~~ed ~ythin~frO~ ~e 'inorder to e~p~dite iiermitsso that this
, ! ~
,project.can be ~ompleted this :year: "" ' " , .
,,' .. ,
"
, ' .; .. '
Rya
" Airport Mamlger, ,"
cc: .
'; ,
Susan CampbelVCarolyn Currie, Airport Secieta~y
• ' ,." ,,', ' .,' t '. ,
", . ,'" ,
, ' '."-' --,---:. -'~
" ' '6--16""W~'-P-er-im-'e-ie~' r-R~d-:'U-~-:-l-t A-, ~R--;e~-to-n-. W--:-~s-h-in-g-to-n.c...9-8-05-7-~-4-25"--4-3-0-n:":'4-7 -l/~F-AX-' -4"':2~5""4-30-~-"'74--;7-2 R' E N TON,
• '~ '. # • AHEAD OF THE CURVE ~ Thispapercontaln~50%'~ledma~rla(~o%postconsumer ,,:, '.. '~. " '
': .
, ,
,
• •
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF
. NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M)
DATE: August 7, 2007
LAND USE NUMBER: LUA07-081, SME, ECF
PROJECT NAME: Airport Soil Remediation
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requested Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Shoreline
Exemption for the removal of contaminated soil at the Renton Municipal Airport Two areas are proposed to be excavated
to the water table (approximately 5 to 8 feet below grade), one to the north of the T-Hanagar and the other to the east of
the T-Hanagar. It is estimated that approximately 1,300 cubic yards of contaminated soH will be removed from the site.
Once the soil is removed, the site will be backfilled with clean, compacted fill material and overlying pavement. The project
site is located within the 200-foot shoreline buffer of the Cedar River. The Cedar River is designated as an Urban
Environment at this location.
PROJECT LOCATION: 616 W Perimeter Road
OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton
has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as
permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS-
M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment
period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance-
Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M.
PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: July 27,2007
NOTtCE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: August6,2007
APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Carl Bach, The Boeing Company; Tel: (206) 898-0438;
Eml: carl.m.bach@boeing.com
Permits/Review Requested:
Other Permits which may be required:
Requested Studies:
Location where application may
be reviewed:
PUBLIC HEARING:
CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW:
Zoning/Land Use:
Environmental Documents that
Evaluate the Proposed Project:
Development Regulations
Used For Project Mitigation:
Environmental (SEPA) Review, Shoreline Exemption
Grading License
Habitat Data Report
Planning/Building/Public Works Department, Development Services
Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA
98057
N/A
The subject site is designated Medium Industrial (1M) on the City of Renton
Comprehensive Land Use Map and Employment Area -Industrial (EAJ) on the
City's Zoning Map. .
Environmental (SEPA) Checklist
The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-4-030
Development Guidelines and Regulations and other applicable codes and
regulations as appropriate.
• •
Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project.
These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered
by existing codes and regulations as cited above.
Erosion and sediment control during project construction shall comply with the 2005 Department of Ecology
Storm water Management Manual's requirements for erosion control.
Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jill Ding, Senior Planner, Development
Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on August 21, 2007. If you have
questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the
Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of
any decision on this project.
CONTACT PERSON: Jill K. Ding, Senior
Eml: jding@cLrenton.wa.us
Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7382;
I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I
if you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete
this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057.
NamelFile No.: Airport Soil Remediation/LUA07-081, SME, ECF
NAME:
MAiLING ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO.:
:.,,-
• . . ,.
Kat~YKeOlker,M~;or .
·.August 7,2007
Carl Bach
. '. The Boeing Company
. POBox 3707,MCIW-12 ..
Seattl~, WA98124 .. " ". ". .
Subject: Airpo~t SoU Relllediation -.' .
'. LUA07~081; SME,.ECF
Dyar MLBach.:
CITV"F RENTON
. 'planning/Building/Public Works Department
. . Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator
'" The DiwelopmentPlal1nivg Secti()noftheCity of Renton hasdeteimined that the subject .
application. is compl~teaccordingto, submittal requir(!ments and, therefore,.is accepted
for revie~. _....'. '. . .'
.'. It is tentativclyscheduiedforcQnsideration!'Y the' EnvirOnmental Revie"w Committee 011.
' .... August27, 2007,Prior to thll(ieview;youw:illl:>enoiifi~d (fany addition~l irifonmiticlJl'" .
'.' ' ... isrequireq to continue.processingyour ajJplic~tion. ... . '. .
" ' .
Sincerely, '; ".:' ',' : .: .... :z:2 .. ," ~ .. , .. '. ....... .... • "-1/ ......... . ',"... ' 1],-):,: " .' _ ~.
....• ··.·.JillKDlng, ..... ~ ....
Senior Planner'C! .•..
cc: .' . City of Reriton -Airport jOw,ner'
I
" • •
City of Renton .",
LAND USE PERMIT
MASTER APPLICATION
PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION
NAME: City of Renton, Clayton Scott Field PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME:
F~eao~~ Fi~ Tr?1ning Area
.' " '" n. ' ~
ADDRESS: 616 W. Parimitar Road
PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE:
616 W. Perimeter Road
CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98055 Renton, WA 98055
TELEPHONE NUMBER: Ryan Zulauf
(425) 430·7471
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
0723059007
APPLICANT (if other than owner)
EXISTING LAND USE(S): Industrial
" , ,
NAME: Carl Bach
-.. -.
PROPOSED LAND USE(S):" "NA "
COMPANY (if applicable): The Boeing Company EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
Employment Area -Industrial
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 3707, MCIW·12 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION
"(if applicable): NA
CITY: Seattle, WA ZIP: 98124
. EXISTING ZONING: Industrial -Medium
TELEPHONE NUMBER (206) 898·0438 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): NA
CONTACT PERSON SITE AREA (in square feet): 108,200
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE
NAME: Carl Bach DEDICATED: NA
COMPANY (if applicable): The Boeing Company SQUAHE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS:
NA
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 3707, MCIW·12
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET
ACRE (if applicable): NA
" " " . "
CITY: Seattle, WA ZIP: 98124
NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS.(if applicablet~NA
NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NA
TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E·MAIL ADDRESS:
(206) 898·0438, carl.m.bach@boeing.com
Q:web/pw/devscrv/forms/planninglmastempp.doc 07/12/07
;
,
\ • , • • PROJECTINFORMATrl~O~N~(~lco=n~t=in=u~e=d)~ ____________ ~
NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable):
NA
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA
NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if
applicable): NA
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE
NEW PROJECT (if applicable): NA
PROJECT VALUE: Approximately $300,000
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA. PLEASE INCLUDE
SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable):
IJ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE
IJ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO
Ilil FLOOD HAZARD AREA 108.200 sq. ft.
IJ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft.
IJ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft.
IJ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft.
IJ WETLANDS sq. ft.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
(Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included)
SITUATE IN THE ~ QUARTER OF SECTION _7_. TOWNSHIP ---1L. RANGE _5_. IN THE CITY
OF RENTON. KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON.
TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES
List all land use applications being applied for:
1. Olv ~M /cZ)::r 3.
2. ?Iti~ ~ /If'c 4.
Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
±b~='-d""'-fc-c~c£<~'f-!'~.p , declare that I am (please check one) the current owner of the property
the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach pruufof autilorization) and that the foregoing
ntained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
(Signature of Owner/Representative)
Q:web/pw/devscrv/fonns/planninglmaslcrapp.doc
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ' 2 k
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her!t
uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
My appointment expires:._-"&'---_2----'~'---_ZO_-'()_2-1-_
2 07112/07
.EVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION •
WAIVER"'OF SUBMITTAL REQUIR~ENTS
FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS
This requirement may be waived by:
1. Property Services Section
2. Public Works Plan Review Section
3. Building Section
4. Development Planning Section
PROJECT NAME: ~ j:U~ ~~
DATE: 7(zvlor ;;xx1.. ~ \.AIIJNltIG
oEV~~~WINTON
"jut 2 7 2007
Q:\WEB\Pw\OEVSERv\Forms\Planning\waiverofsubmiUalreqs_9-OB.xls RECE\ViR
~EVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION A
WAIVE~F SUBMITTAL REQUIR~ENTS
FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS
Applicant 11~"o"~Qn' Statement
Inventory of
Lease Agreement, Draft
Map of Site Conditions 3
Map of View Area 2 AND
Photosimulations 2 AND 3
This requirement may be waive'd by:
1, Property Services Section
2. Public Works Plan Review Section
PROJECT NAME: IbAffftit ~l1-r/?:WU,?f. 0ret: "
DATE: .&tt /'Cmeoll~ 3. Building Section
4. Development,:PI~!'!.ning Se.ctior . -" , . 1IZ~(01
\ , , .
-'" '. ;"." ..
Q:\WEB\Pw\OEVSERV\F~rms\Planning\waiverofsubmittatreqs_9-Q6.xis 09/06
• •
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Former South Fire Training Area
Renton, Washington
~ Geomatrix
P\,I',N.NING oEV~~~t{TON
'Jut 2 i 2Il07
RECE\VED
The proposed action is to clean up contaminated soil at the former South Fire Training Area
(FSFT A) located at the Renton Municipal Airport, approximately 0.4 mile south of Lake
Washington and about 80 feet west of the Cedar River. The FSFTAwas reportedly used from
the late 1950s until approximately 1970. It is visible in aerial photographs from 1964 and 1967
as a rectangular surface feature measuring approximately 100 by ISO feet. In addition to the
fire training area, the aerial photographs show what appears to be a drum storage area located
immediately south of the FSFT A. In the mid-I 970s, a hangar building for small private aircraft
was constructed over a portion of the FSFT A and the area around the hangar was paved.
The City of Renton (City) owns the Renton Municipal Airport and leases the property to
several private companies. Although Boeing does not currently own or lease the FSFT A, both
Boeing and the City formerly practiced fire training in this area.
The Renton Municipal Airport is situated in the southern portion of the Puget Sound Lowland,
a broad, relatively level glacial drift plain that is dissected by a network of deep marine
embayments. The FSFTA lies within the Cedar River alluvial fan, near the confluence of the
Cedar River Valley and the Lake Washington Basin. The Cedar River alluvial fan consists
primarily of sand and gravel deposits with lesser amounts of interbedded silt, clay, and volcanic
ash. Adjacent to the proposed project site the Cedar River flows from south to north between
properties occupied by Boeing manufacturing facilities and the Renton Municipal Airport. The
Cedar River drains into Lake Washington approximately 0.4 mile north of the FSFTA. The
FSFT A is located on the west side of the Cedar River. The topography of the area is relatively
flat with a slight slope to the northeast towards the Cedar River.
There are two areas at the FSFT A where soil sample results identify concentrations above
MICA Method A cleanup levels in soil. The larger area is at the north end of the Hangar
building. Samples collected in this area contained volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH)-gasoline range, TPH-
J:\11193.000 Boeing FSFr A \OO3l.Projcct Narrative_rev _sx.doc I
• • ~~ Geomatrix
diesel range, semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), and chromium above MTCA A
cleanup levels. The approximate extent of the affected area is 80 feet by 110 feet, extending
approximately 60 feet north of the hangar building, and extending west onto the runway to the
edge of the grass and approximately 20 feet east of the east side ofthe hangar building.
The smaller affected soil area is on the east side of the hangar building, approximately 75 feet
south of the north end of the building. Samples collected in this area contained TPH-gasoline
range and TPH-diesel range above MTCA A cleanup levels. The approximate extent of the
affected area is 90-feet long and 25-feet wide, extending along the east side of the hangar
building. This area does not appear to be related to the FSFTA release. Samples collected at
locations inside of the hangar building did not exceed cleanup levels; therefore, this affected
area is presumed to not extend beneath the hangar building.
The goal of the soil removal is to remove soil affected by constituents ofconcem (COCs)
above the soil cleanup levels. Soil confirmation sample analytical results will be compared to
the soil removal cleanup levels. If a soil confirmation sample contains COCs above the soil
removal cleanup level, additional soil will be removed within the site constraints; these
constraints include the groundwater depth, support of the existing building hangar, and the
presence of utilities in the excavation area. The soil confirmation sample locations will be
determined using methods such as field measurements from a known reference point or global
positioning system (OPS) measurements.
The affected soil will be removed to the extent practicable, given the presence of utilities,
potential effects on existing buildings and/or structures, and the stability of the excavation. It is
estimated that about 1,300 cubic yards of soil will be excavated, and it is assumed that it will
take approximately 5 days to complete the soil removal for the FSFT A. However, actual
excavation times may be longer, especially if it is necessary to complete successive excavation
steps. Oeomatrix staff will assist the Boeing project manager in locating the excavation extent
and collecting soil confirmation samples in consultation with Boeing. A OPS survey
instrument will be used to locate the extent of the planned excavation.
Excavation will not be conducted closer than 5 feet from the hangar building in order to
minimize the potential to adversely affect the building foundation. Work activities within the
excavation area will be conducted in accordance with the Washington Industrial Safety and
Health Act (WISHA) regulations, including WAC 2969-155, Part N for excavation safety and
WAC 296-843 for HAZWOPER safety. Site-Specific Health and Safety Plans meeting these
1:\11193.000 Boeing FSFTAlOO3\Project Narrative_ rev_sx..doc 2
• • • ~Geomatrix
WISHA requirements will be required for all subcontractors working on this excavation prior
to conducting on-site work. Health and safety monitoring will be conducted during the
excavation activities in accordance with the Site-Specific Health & Safety Plans
Soils in the FSFTA that exceed the soil cleanup levels will be excavated to the water table,
which is expected to be encountered at a depth of approximately 5 to 8 feet below ground
surface (bgs). Additional soil below the water table may be excavated to the extent practicable
without compromising the integrity of the adjacent pavement, foundations, and utilities.
Should visual or olfactory observations or photo ionization detector (PID) measurements
indicate the likely presence of additional contaminated soil outside the planned excavation area,
the soil will be removed. The final extent and volume of the excavation will be based on these
field observations and depth to groundwater at the time the work is performed. A qualified
field representative will observe the excavation and document the lateral extents and depth of
soil excavation.
Excavation will be completed using a backhoe, excavator, or other means, and soil will be
properly managed on site prior to off-site disposal. Excavated soil will be placed directly in
roll-off boxes or trucks, or stockpiled on a constructed pad. Every effort will made to place
excavated material directly into roll-off boxes or trucks and removed from the site. If a
constructed soil stockpile pad is needed, it will be fabricated out oOO-mil polyethylene
sheeting, lumber, sand bags, and other appropriate materials. The lumber would be used to
construct berms to minimize spills and runoff or runon. When the excavation is not active, the
stockpiled soils would be covered by 6-rnil polyethylene tarps to minimize rainfall infiltration
and erosion. The covering tarp would be secured at the end of the working day with sand bags
or other weights. Any water draining from stockpiled soils would be collected and
containerized for proper disposal.
Once soil removal is completed, the excavation will be backfilled with clean fill material from
a commercial source and the overlying pavement will be replaced with a surface meeting City
requirements for continuing operations at the airport.
1:\11193.000 Boeing FSFTA\003IProject Narrativc_ rcv_sx.doc 3
• • Jt~.§l Geomatrix
~pv,!'!~
CONSTRUCTION MITIGA TION DESCRIPTIOMel~~flEtn"6N
Fonner South Fire Training Area .. ut 1; '2.001 .
Renton, Washington . 1 .. .. ED
REtE\\]
N9ie1iThsor@idl:g~IlSl1ii£!,gpp1ia\:tibmfo'i:111i~rPtl'ii~t!t\\\?~fi®ti!f~Ymtiffia~Jfu)\lQ:007@ia>~A§
&~~fil~'i'iiillti1l'8i7B'oJ.1ifi06r.6Y~~iiY'1Tif:R~6"rlr;gffi
The proposed action is to clean up contaminated soil at the former South Fire Training Area
(FSFT A) located at the Renton Municipal Airport, approximately 0.4 mile south of Lake
Washington and about 80 feet west of the Cedar River. The FSFT A was reportedly used from
the late 1950s until approximately 1970. In the mid-l 970s, a hangar building for small private
aircraft was constructed over a portion of the FSFTA and the area around the hangar was
paved. The City of Renton (City) owns the Renton Municipal Airport and leases the property
to several private companies. Although Boeing does not currently own or lease the FSFT A,
both Boeing and the City formerly practiced fire training in this area. Boeing is funding and
taking the lead on this environmental restoration project.
Adjacent to the proposed project site the Cedar River flows from south to north between
properties occupied by Boeing manufacturing facilities and the RentonMunicipal Airport. The
Cedar River drains into LakeWashington approximately 0.4 mile north of the FSFTA. The
FSFT A is located on the west side of the Cedar River. The topography of the area is relatively
flat with a slight slope to the northeast towards the Cedar River.
The goal of the soil removal is to remove contaminated soil from the area that is above the soil
cleanup levels. The affected soil will be removed to the extent practicable, given the presence
of utilities, potential effects on existing buildings and/or structures, and the stability of the
excavation. It is estimated that about 1,300 cubic yards of soil will be excavated, and it is
assumed that it will take approximately 5 days to complete the soil removal for the FSFT A.
The excavation is proposed to be completed in late September 2007 with work occurring on
weekdays from 7 AM until 6 PM.
Excavation will not be conducted closer than 5 feet from the hangar building in order to
minimize the potential to adversely affect the building foundation. Excavation will be
completed using a backhoe, excavator, or other means, and soil will be properly managed on
site prior to off-site disposal. Prior to beginning excavation, straw wattles will be installed
J;\1 1193.000 Boeing FSFTA\003\Construction Mitigation Decsription_7 _26_Sx.doc 1
..... ' • • ~~ Geomatrix
around the proposed work area to minimize sediment run-on and run-off to and from the work
area. In addition, to further control sediment migration from the work site, filter socks will be
installed at every nearby catch basin. To minimize sloughing, the excavation sidewalls shall be
sloped 1 H: 1 V or at the angle of natural repose, whichever is flatter.
Excavated soil will be placed directly in roll-off boxes or trucks, or stockpiled on a constructed
pad. Every effort will made to place excavated material directly into roll-off boxes or trucks
and removed from the site. As noted in the Grading Permit Application, if a constructed soil
stockpile pad is needed, it will be fabricated out of30-mil polyethylene sheeting, lumber, sand
bags, and other appropriate materials. The lumber would be used to construct berms to
minimize spills and runoff or runon. When the excavation is not active, the stockpiled soils
would be covered by 6-mil polyethylene tarps to minimize rainfall infiltration and erosion. The
covering tarp would be secured at the end of the working day with sand bags or other weights.
Any water draining from stockpiled soils would be collected and containerized for proper
disposal. To control dust and minimize potential for erosion, the excavated soil shall remain
covered over night, during non-working periods, and during wet periods.
The proposed haul route for the excavated soils from the site is Perimeter Road East to Logan
Avenue North to N. 6th Street, to Park Avenue North to I-40S. The reverse route is proposed
for bringing engineered backfill to the site to fill the excavation.
Once soil removal is completed, the excavation will be backfilled with clean fill material from
a commercial source and the overlying pavement will be replaced with a surface meeting City
requirements for continuing operations at the airport.
J:\l I 193.000 Boeing FSFTA\003lConstruction Mitigation Decsription_'_26_Sx.doc 2
•
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
FSFTA Conlaminated Soil Remediation
Boeing Renton and Renton Municipal Airport Cleanup
2. Name of applicant
The Boeing Company
P.O. Box 3707, MC 1W-12
Seattle, WA 98124-2207
•
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Carl Bach (206) 898-0438
The Boeing Company
P.O. Box 3707, MC 1W-12
Seattle, WA 98124-2207
4. Date checklist prepared:
May4,2007
5. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Renton
~ Geomatrix
DEVaOPMe'!!,~ON
,CITY of ""'"
j ". " .--"JUL 2 7 2007 '
RECEIVED
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Tentative start summer 2007. Due to wet winter weather, this interim action should be
completed before November 1, 2007.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related
to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
Yes. The current remediation will remove accessible soil located adjacent to an
existing building. Additional excavation will be necessary in the future after the building
is demolished.
J:\11193.ooo Boeing FSFTAI,003\SEPA Envlroomental Checklist_Slt.doc 1
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FSFr A Interim Action
• • ~ Geomatrix
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or
will be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
Former South Fire Training Area Soil Removal Work Plan, submitted to Ecology in
November 2005. Revised Former South Fire Training Area Soil Removal Work Plan
submitted to Ecology in May 2007.
Former South Fire Training Area Source Area Delineation .Results Memorandum,
submitted to Ecology on February 13, 2006.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of
other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain. .
No.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,
if known.
Federal:
None known at this time
State of Washington:
SEPA DNS from the City of Renton
Ecology approval of soil removal work plan
King County:
None
City of.Renton/Local:
Grade and fill permit
Shoreline permit or exemption
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to
include additional specific information on project description.)
Site remediation by removal of contaminated soil. Two areas will be excavated to the
water table (estimated to be about 5 to B feet below grade). The first is antiCipated to
measure about 100-feet long by 25-feet wide and the second area is anticipated to
measure 11 O-feet long by BO-feet wide. Soil samples will be collected to confirm
removal of contaminated soil. If necessary, the extent of the excavation will be
increased (increased depth or increased area) to ensure removal of contaminated soil.
The removed soil will be characterized and disposed in accordance with applicable
regulations.
Once soil removal is completed, the excavation will be backfilled with clean, compacted
fill material and the overlying pavement will be replaced with a surface meeting City
requirements.
J:\11193.000 Boeing FSFTA\003ISEPA Environmental Checklist_Sx.doc 2
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FSFT A Interim Action
• • ~ Geomatrix
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and
section, township,' and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site
plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should
submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or
detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist
This area is located at the Renton Municipal Airport, approximately 0.4 mile south of
Lake Washington and about 80 feet west of the Cedar River Waterway. Figure
attached. The largest excavation area will be at the north end of the northernmost
hangar located east of the runway. The second area is along the east side of the
northernmost hangar, approximately 125 feet south of the northern end of the hangar.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1, Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): ~rolling, hilly
steep slopes, mountainous, other ~
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
1-2%
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify
them and note any prime farmland.
Gravelly to silty sand and silts
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in .the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
No
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. .
Approximately 1,300 cubic yards of soil will be removed and replaced with clean
structural fill from a commercial source. Once the area is backfilled, road base will
be placed, and it will be paved with structural concrete or asphalt to match the
existing surface.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe.
No. Site is entirely paved, no clearing is necessary.
1:\11193.000 Boeing FSFTAlOO3\SEPA Environmental Chccklist_Sx.doc
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
3
FSFT A Interim Action
• • ~ Geomatrix
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after
project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
The existing surface is impervious and will be replaced with a similar surface.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the
earth, if any:
2. Air
BMPs will be implemented during construction per the Boeing Renton Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan.
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dus~
automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the
project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities
if known.
Air emissions from construction machinery and trucks used for hauling
contaminated soils from the site would be expected. These will be temporary and
are expected to be minor. The project is anticipated to be completed within 5 days.
Odors were not detected during previous excavations of similarly contaminated soil
(i.e., similar concentrations of similar contaminants) that have been conducted at
the Boeing Renton facility. In accordance with the Health and Safety Plan that will
be followed during excavation, air monitoring will be conducted to monitor ambient
levels of VOlatile contaminants within the work area. Appropriate dust control
measures (water) will be used as necessary.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your
proposal? If so, generally describe.
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if
any:
Mitigation measures will be implemented as required to meet or exceed all
applicable standards as required by the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency and the
Department of Ecology. Additional potential mitigation measures to reduce
emissions include ensuring that machines and equipment used during excavation
are well maintained and engines are tuned to factory speCifications.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,
1:\11193.000 Boeing FSFTA'OO3\sEPA Environmental Checklisl_Sx..doc 4
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FSFTA Interim Action
• • ~ Geomatrix
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state
what stream or river it flows into.
Lake Washington and the Cedar River Waterway, which discharges to Lake
Washington.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)
the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Lake Washington is located more than 200 feet away from the excavation
locations. The Cedar River Waterway is located approximately 80 feet away
from the excavation locations. Figure 1 attached.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that
would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
None
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give
general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No. Water used for dust suppression will be obtained from the Renton public
water system.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on
the site plan.
Yes. Figure 1 attached.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
discharge.
No
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground
water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if
known.
No·
J:\l 1 193.000 Boeing FSFTNOO3\SEPA Environmental Checklist_Sx.doc 5
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FSFTA Interim Action
• • ~ Geomatrix
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic
tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial,
agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of
such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
None
c. Water runoff (including storm-water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this
water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
The excavation will be conducted in compliance with the general stormwater
permit for construction sites. The excavation methods will be designed to limit
stormwater contact with contaminated soil and prevent runoff of any rainfall
which has contacted excavated or exposed soil. Examples of BMPs,
preventative measures, and project controls to be implemented include: filter
fabric placed in stormwater catch basins in the area, activities not conducted if
raining, placement of excavated material in covered shipping container or
placed on plastic sheeting, covered with plastic sheeting to prevent contact with
rainwater, and bermed to prevent run-on and/or runoff.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally
describe.
No. See response to 3.c. 1) above.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water
impacts, if any:
4. Plants
See response to 3.c. 1) above. BMPs contained in the site SWPPP will be
followed. Additionally, the excavation will be scheduled for completion prior to
the rainy season.
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs, grass, pasture, crop or grain,
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk
cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil
other types of vegetation
None. Entire project area is paved.
J:\11193.oo0 Boeing FSFTA\Q03ISEPA Environmental Checklist_Sx,doc 6
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FSFT A Interim Action
• • ~.Geomatrix
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
None
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
None. No landscaping will be affected by the project and none will be added.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or
are known to be on or near the site:
Birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site are listed
below:
birds:
mammals:
fish:
seagulls, crows, ducks, geese, sparrows, starlings
none observed
coho salmon, Chinook salmon sockeye salmon steelhead
and cutthroat trout, native char (bull trout) and long fin
smelt
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
Chinook salmon use the Cedar River for migration, spawning and rearing. There is
limited suitable habitat for these fish in the river reach immediately adjacent to the
project site. There is a known population of bull trout in the Cedar River watershed
above the Landsburg Dam on the City of Seattle municipal watershed. This
population is considered to be isolated in this location and there is no indication
these fish would be expected to be in the vicinity of the project area.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Pacific Flyway for migratory waterfowl. Cedar River for various salmonid fishes,
including Chinook, sockeye, coho salmon, and cutthroat and steel head trout.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
Utilize temporary stormwater and erosion control measures during excavation,
backfilling, and paving. The project will remediate the site and remove a potential
source for contaminant releases to groundwater and surface water.
1:\11193.000 Boeing FSFTA\003\SEPA Environmental Checklist_Sx.doc
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
7
FSFTA Interim Action
--------------
• • ~ Geomatrix
6. Energy and natural resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be
used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be
used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Petroleum hydrocarbon fuels will be used in construction machinery and trucks
used in excavation and hauling of contaminated soils from the project site.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe.
No
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included In the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if
any:
Trucks and construction machinery engines will be maintained and tuned to factory
specification prior to use on the project.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur
as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
The project will result in a net reduction in environmental health hazards, since
contaminated soil present at the project site will be remediated. During the project,
there will be some potential for short-term exposure to Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons, Volatile Organic Compounds, Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds,
Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls, and metals, as these constituents are present in the
contaminated soil to be removed. The excavation work has been designed to
minimize the potential for exposure to site contaminants during the work; disposal
in accordance with regulations will minimize long-term hazards. A Work Plan for
the remediation will be submitted to Ecology for review prior to conducting the
remediation work. A Health and Safety Plan specific to the project will be
developed and followed to mitigate these potential hazards. The excavated
material will be characterized and disposed per applicable regulations.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
No special emergency services are antiCipated. The hazardous materials
involved have been commonly managed and are reasonably expected to be
within the capability of existing emergency service operations.
J:\11193.000 Boeing FSFTA'.OO3\SEPA Environmental Checklist_Sx.doc 8
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FSFT A Interim Action
• • ~~ Geomatrix
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if
any:
A Health and Safety Plan will be developed and followed during the project to
mitigate the potential for hazards within the work area. A Work Plan
documenting the excavation and soil management methods has been prepared
and will be submitted to Ecology for review prior to performing the work. The
Work Plan documents methods and precautions that will be followed to
minimize the potential for creating environmental health hazards during the
work. The planned remediation work will provide an overall reduction in
environmental health hazards.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for
example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
Noise from airport operations and industrial activities from the adjacent aircraft
manufacturing operations are present at this site. These noise sources are not
expected to affect the project.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the
project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from
the site.
Temporary noise impacts during construction are anticipated. Construction
projects of this type typically produce noise levels that range from 68 to 98 dba
at 50 feet from the specific equipment. Construction will take place, typically
from dawn to duSk, for about five working days. No longcterm noise sources
are associated with the project.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None. All work will be conducted during normal daylight working hours.
8. Land and shoreline use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The site is fully developed as a municipal airport. All work will be conducted in
areas that are presently paved. Adjacent to the east of the site is the Cedar River
Waterway, with existing pavement located between the project site and the
Waterway.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No, the Renton Airport has existed at the site since the 1950s, with prior use as a
federal airfield.
J:\l1193.oo0 Boeing FSFTA\OO3\SEPA Environmental Cbecklist_Slt.doc
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
9
FSFT A Interim Action
• • ~ Geomatrix
c. Describe any structures on the site.
The site is fully developed as a municipal airport. The project site is located next to
a small airplane hanger.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No. Only surface pavement will be removed above the excavation. Removed
pavement will be restored after completing the excavation.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
The site is designated Industrial-Medium (1M) on the City's Zoning.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Employment Area (Industrial).
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the
site?
Lake Washington shoreline is designated as a "Shoreline of State-wide
Significance" and the Cedar River Waterway is designated as a "Shoreline of the
State".
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"
area? Ifso,.specify.
No
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
None
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
Not Applicable
I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with
existing and projected land uses and plans, if any:
Compliance with city code.
1:\11193.000 Boeing FSFTA1OO3\sEPA Environmental Chccklist_Sx.doc
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
10
FSFT A Interim Action
• • ~ Geomatrix
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low-income housing.
None
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
Not Applicable
10. Aesthetics·
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including
antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
No structures are proposed
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Not Applicable
11. Light and glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day
would it mainly occur?
None
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere
with views? .
No
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None
J:\}l 193.000 Boeing FSFTAI0031SEPA Environmental Cbecklist_Sx.doc 11
ENVIRONMENf AL CHECKLIST FSFT A Interim Action
• • ~~ Geomatrix
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Not Applicable
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinity?
The Cedar River Trail Park, which includes the Cedar River shoreline and Lake
Washington, are nearby. Recreational activities in the immediate vicinity of the
project area are primarily boating and to a lesser extent, fishing. Swimmers have
not been observed in the immediate project vicinity. Swimming activities primarily
occur at Gene Coulon Park, located approximately 1/2 mile northeast of the project
location.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
The proposed remediation project would enhance environmental quality of the
area, thereby contributing to an overall improvement in recreational qualities of the
area.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or
local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally
describe.
No
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. .
None have been identified on the project site.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
Although previous, extensive excavations conducted within the Renton Municipal
Airport area have disclosed no indications of archaeological Significance, if artifacts
are uncovered, work in that area will be halted pending notification and response
from appropriate agencies.
1:\11193.000 Boeing FSFTA\OO3ISEPA Environmental Chccklist_Sx.doc 12
. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FSFT A Interim Action
• • ~ Geomatrix
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
The Renton Municipal Airport is served by Perimeter Road East North. Figure
attached.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate
distance to the nearest transit stop?
Yes
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate?
None
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
No
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
Yes, the project site is at the Renton Municipal Airport. Small quantities of potable
water will be used as needed for dust control during the excavation.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
None. Traffic would only be affected during the excavation for worker and material
transportation. These effects are expected to be minimal.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
None. Only minimal, short-term transportation impacts are expected during project
implementation.
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for
example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so,
generally describe.
None anticipated.
1:\11193.000 Boeing FSFTA\Q03\SEPA Environmental Checklist_Sx.doc 13
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FSFTA Interim Action
--------------------------------
• • ~ Geomatrix
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if
any.
None
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water,
refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
Electricity, natural gas, potable city water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary
sewer and storm sewerage are currently available.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing
the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the
immediate vicinity which might be needed.
None
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge.
understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Date Submitted: _____________ _
J:\11193.ooo Boeing FSFTAIQ03\sEPA Environmental Cheddist_Sx..doc 14
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FSFT A Interim Action
]
.; ~~~-=~Ll~~~~~~±d~wL~
"E 0 960 Feet
~ Note: Base Data from King 2004. I
~
~
~
~
Sl
gJ Note:
Washington
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Former South Fire Training Area
Renton Municipal Airport
Renton, Washington
~ Site Is the approximate location of the ~L-~F~o~~:.~r=SO=~~F='rn:T~~:'n=in:g~c=.=nm=r ______________________ 1-~~~~~~o~=~~~C;~e~()~nn~a~t:r~i)(~ __ L-~F:lg:ur~e~ __ 1~ __ .J
{
j ..
I·
~
l
GRASS
~
1
0 ••
PROPOSED
EXCAVA"ON
AREA
50
APPROXIMATE SCAlE IN FEET
TAXIWAY
o
Tower
'ill
a
/,'.'
PROPOSED
EXCAVATION
AREA \
\
PLANNED EXCAVATION
Former South Fire Training Area
Renton, Washington
Iittg Geomatrix Rgure 2
~----------~---------------------
• •
HABITAT DATA REPORT
Former South Fire Training Area
Renton, Washington
July 26, 2007
1.0 PROJECT AREA HABIT AT
~ Geomatrix
The proposed action is to clean .up contaminated soil at the fonner South Fire Training Area
(FSFTA) located at the Renton Municipal Airport, approximately 0.4 mile south of Lake
Washington and 100 feet west of the Cedar River (Figure I). The FSFTA was reportedly used
from the late 1950s until approximately 1970. It is visible as a surface feature in aerial
photographs from 1964 and 1967 as a rectangular area measuring approximately 100 by
150 feet. In addition to the fire training area, the aerial photographs show what appears to be a
drum storage area located immediately south of the FSFTA. In the mid-I 970s, a hangar
building for small private aircraft was constructed over a portion of the FSFTA and the area
around the hangar was paved.
The Renton Municipal Airport is situated in the southern portion of the Puget Sound Lowland,
a broad, relatively level glacial drift plain that is dissected by a network of deep marine
ernbayments. The FSFT A lies within the Cedar River alluvial fan, near the confluence of the
Cedar River Valley and the Lake Washington Basin. The Cedar River alluvial fan consists
primarily of sand and gravel deposits with lesser amounts of interbedded silt, clay, and volcanic
ash. Adjacent to the proposed project site the Cedar River flows from south to north between
properties occupied by Boeing manufacturing facilities and the Renton Municipal Airport. The
Cedar River drains into Lake Washington approximately 0.4 mile north of the FSFT A. The
FSFTA is located on the west side of the Cedar River. The topography of the area is relatively
flat with a slight slope to the northeast towards the Cedar River.
There are two areas at the FSFT A where soil sample results identify concentrations above
MTCA Method A cleanup levels in soil. The larger area is at the north end of the Hangar
building. Samples collected in this area contained Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs),
. PCBs, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)-gasoline range, TPH-diesel range, Semi-Volatile
Organic Compounds (SVOCs), and chromium above MTCA A cleanup levels. The
approximate extent of the affected area is 80 feet by liD feet, extending approximately 60 feet
north of the Hangar building, and extending west onto the runway to the edge of the grass and
approximately 20 feet east of the east side of the Hangar building.
J:\I I 193.000 Boeing FSFTA\()()3IDraft Habitat Data Rcport_Sx.doc I
• • ~ Geomatrix
There is no habitat in the immediate project area as the site is entirely developed. The site is
paved for taxi way access to and from the hanger facility around which the proposed soil
excavations will take place (See Figure I, Site Plan). Some habitat exists approximately 80 to
100 ft east of the project area in the landscaped banks of the Cedar River and in the river itself.
The configuration of this reach of the river is the result ofre-routing of the Cedar River by the
US Anny Corps of Engineers (Corps) in 1916 as part of the construction and operation of the
Lake Washington Ship Canal (Ship Canal). Prior to construction of the Ship Canal, the Lake
Washington water level was approximately 9 ft higher than today. Prior to 1916 Lake
Washington drained from its southern end via the Black River through what is now the City of
Renton. The Cedar River was a tributary to the Black River which at its confluence with the
Green River became the Duwamish River that drains to Elliott Bay in Seattle. The Cedar River
was diverted by the Corps to provide sufficient water flows into the system to operate the locks
on the Ship Canal.
The existing channel was designed to facilitate discharge of the Cedar River into the lake and to
control flooding. Subsequent to the re-routing and channelization of the Cedar River the
Boeing Company built aircraft manufacturing facilities and the U.S. Anny built an adjacent air
field for the construction of aircraft during World War II on either bank of the river channel.
Thus, this area has been in a highly modified and developed state for approximately 90 years.
Military and commercial aircraft manufacturing has been in continuous operation for more than
60 years on the east back of the river and airport operations have dominated the west bank of
the river for an equal span oftime. As noted above the project site has been paved for
approximately 30 years. Prior to development as it currently exists, the site was used for fire
training exercises by the Boeing Company and the operators of the airport, the City of Renton.
Therefore, no habitat for plants or animals exists at the project location, nor has there been an
opportunity for habitat to exist for more than 60 years.
2.0 MIGRA nON OR MOVEMENT CORRIDORS
The Cedar River, to the east of the project site represents a migration and movement corridor
for a variety of salmonid fish species, some of which are listed as threatened, under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA).
The river segment adjacent to the project area may offer some limited rearing habitat for fish
species using the Cedar River. It is, however, because of its limited habitat values, primarily a
migration and movement corridor for the migratory fish species that make use of the Cedar
River. Both adults and juvenile fish use this reach while moving between Lake Washington and
1:\11193.000 Boeing FSFTA\OO3\Drafl Habitat Data RepoI1_Sx.doc 2
• . ~ . • • ~ Geomatrix
the river. Several species that use the corridor are anadromous fish that are moving from the
marine environment to freshwater as adults to spawn and their progeny make the return trip to
rear and grow to adulthood. Generally the adults are moving upstream from August though
March, depending on the species. Juvenile outrnigration generally occurs from January through
June.
3.0 EXPECTED WILDLIFE SPECIES
Species that use the Cedar River for migration, spawning, and rearing include:
• Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)
• Sockeye salmon (0. nerka)
• Coho salmon (0. kisutch)
• Steelhead trout (0. mykiss)
• Cutthroat trout (0. clarki)
Other wildlife that may use the banks of the Cedar River where some vegetation exists to the
east of the project area. The species expected would likely be those acclimated to human
disturbance because of the surrounding land uses. These would likely include a variety of birds
and small mammals, primarily rodents. A review of the Natural Heritage Database records
indicated that there are no resources listed in the database in the project vicinity. A request has
been made to the Washington Department ofFish and Wildlife (WDFW) for Priority Species
and Habitats data in the project vicinity. We have not received this information at this time but
will revise this section of the report when the data are received from WDFW.
4.0 AREAS DISTURBED OR DEGRADED BY HUMAN ACTIVITY
As noted above the entire area has been disturbed and degraded by human activity over the last
90 years. The site has been heavily developed for more than 60 years. The project site is
entirely paved.
5.0 SUMMARY OF EXISTING HABITAT FUNCTIONS AND VALUES
The specific project site is paved and therefore offers no habitat functions and values.
J:\11193.000 Boeing FSFfAlOO3\Draft Habitat Data Report_Sx.doc 3
•
-.... • • ~~ Geomatrix
6.0 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED HABITAT ALTERATIONS AND IMPACTS
The project will not alter the existing conditions with the exception of removal of sources of
contamination in the site soils that could adversely affect groundwater quality. Discharges of
groundwater to surface waters in the vicinity could adversely affect fish and other receptors in
the Cedar River. Implementation of this project will remove this potential adverse impact to
the environment. At the conclusion of the project the paved surfaces of the. site will be restored
to the existing condition to support ongoing airport operations.
1:\11193.000 Boeing FSFTAI,003\Draft Habitat Data Report_Sx.doc 4
,--------c-------------------------------------------------------------
• • tWl~ Geomatrix
STREAM STUDY REPORT
Fonner South Fire Training Area
Renton, Washington
July 26, 2007
1.0 STREAM CLASSIFICATION
The Cedar River adjacent to the project site is classified as a Shoreline of the State in the City
of Renton Shoreline Master Program.
2.0 VEGETATIVE COVER OF THE SITE
There is no vegetative cover at the location of the project site because it is a paved airport
taxiway used by airplanes to move between the hanger arid the runway.
The banks of the Cedar River, approximately 80 feet (ft) to the east of the project site, and
grassy areas between the taxiway and the runway have the only vegetation in the project
vicinity. All other surfaces are paved or have buildings. The bank of the Cedar River in the
vicinity of the project site is covered with shrubs and emergent vegetation.
3.0 ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS
The immediate project site offers no ecological functions. Some habitat exists east of the
project area in the landscaped banks of the Cedar River and in the river itself. The
configuration of this reach of the river is the result of rerouting of the Cedar River by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) in 1916 as part of the construction and operation of the Lake
Washington Ship Canal (Ship Canal) (Chrzastowski, 1983). Prior to construction of the Ship
Canal, the Lake Washington water level was approximately 9 ft higher than today. Prior to
1916 Lake Washington drained from its southern end via the Black River through what is now
the City of Renton. The Cedar River was a tributary to the Black River, which at its confluence
with the Green ,River became the Duwamish River that drains to Elliott Bay in Seattle
(Chrzastowski, 1983). Thus, prior to 1916, the Cedar River and the Lake Washington basin
were part of the Green!Duwamish River basin. Since July 1916, the Lake Washington/Cedar
River basin has drained to Puget Sound through the Ship Canal. The Cedar River was diverted
into Lake Washington by the Corps to provide sufficient water flows into the system to operate
the locks on the Ship Canal.
1:\11193.000 Boeing FSITA\OO3\Draft Stream Study RepOI1_Sx.doc 1
-------l
~---------------------------------------------------
• • _ Geomatrix
The existing channel was designed to facilitate discharge of the Cedar River into the lake and to
control flooding. Subsequent to the rerouting and channelization of the Cedar River, the
Boeing Company built aircraft manufacturing facilities and the U.S. Army built an adjacent air
field for the construction of aircraft during World War II on either bank of the river channel.
Thus, this area has been in a highly modified and developed state for approximately 90 years.
Military and commercial aircraft manufacturing has been in continuous operation for more than
60 years on the east bank of the river, and airport operations have dominated the west bank of
the river for an equal span of time. As noted above, the project site has been paved for
approximately 30 years. Prior to development into its current state, the site was used for fire
training exercises by the Boeing Company and the operators of the airport, the City of Renton.
Therefore, no habitat for plants or animals exists at the project location, nor has there been an
opportunity for habitat to exist for more than 60 years.
4.0 FISH AND WILDLIFE
Species that use the Cedar River for migration, spawning, and rearing include:
• Chinook salmon (Oncorhvnchus tshawvtscha),
• Sockeye salmon (0. nerka),
• Coho salmon (0. kisutch),
• Steelhead trout (0. mykiss), and
• Cutthroat trout (0. clarki).
The river segment adjacent to the project area may offer some limited rearing habitat for fish
species using the Cedar River. It is, however, because of its limited habitat values, primarily a
migration and movement corridor for the migratory fish species that make use of the Cedar
River. Both adults and juvenile fish use this reach while moving between Lake Washington
and the river. Several species that use the corridor are anadromous fish that are moving from
the marine environment to freshwater as adults to spawn, and their progeny make the return trip
to rear and grow to adulthood. Generally the adults are moving upstream from August though
March, depending on the species. Juvenile outrnigration generally occurs from January through
June.
The anadromous fish species using the Cedar River display a number oflife-history strategies.
Sockeye salmon spawn in the Cedar River in large numbers, with escapements in some years
J:\11193.000 Boeing FSFTA\003\Draft Stream Study Report_Sx.doc 2
• • ~ Geomatrix
exceeding 300,000 adults, producing juveniles that rear in Lake Washington for up to 2 years
before migrating to the marine environment. Chinook salmon juveniles follow two different
migration patterns from the Cedar River to'the marine environment. One group of juveniles
leaves the river shortly after emergence from the gravel and migrates directly to Puget Sound as
fry. Another group rears in the Cedar River for several weeks to a few months and leaves the
river as smolts on their way to the marine environment (Kiyohara and Volkhardt, 2007). Coho
salmon and steelhead and cutthroat trout juveniles both rear in the river for 1 to 2 years before ,
migrating to saltwater.
Age 0+ Chinook production from the Cedar River was estimated at 117,559 in 2006. Due to
the alternative life-history strategies noted above, outmigration timing was bimodal, with fry
emigrating in January through late-April comprising 84% of the total migration. Egg to
migrant survival was estimated at 7.8%. Over the season, age 0+ Chinook increased in size
from less than 34 millimeters (mm) in January to 116 mm by mid-June. Over the season, based
on actual catch and estimates of capture rates by Washington Department ofFish and Wildlife
(WDFW) scientists, out-migrations of coho, steelhead, and cutthroat smolts were estimated at
38,023; 267; and 2,000; respectively (Kiyohara and Volkhardt, 2007).
Puget Sound Chinook salmon are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act,
including the population that spawns in the Lake Washington Basin. The Cedar River
population is historically the largest in the Lake Washington basin (Carrasco et ai., 1998).
During the period from 1964 to 2002 chinook spawners in the Cedar River have ranged from a
low of 120 in 2000 to a high of 1,752 in 1966 (Carrasco et ai., 1998; Mavros et ai., 1999;
WDFW, unpublished data). These numbers a~e derived using the WDFW Area Under the
Curve (AUC) method and should be regarded as index numbers for relative comparison and not
actual numbers of fish in the system (Mavros et ai., 1999). Table 1 shows the comparison of
spawning fish observed by WDFW survey personnel in the Cedar River for sockeye, steelhead,
and Chinook salmon between 1964 and 2002.
The data on chinook spawner and redd distributions observed in the Cedar River in two recent
survey reports (Carrasco et al., 1998; Mavros et ai., 1999) show the vast majority of fish use the
Cedar River upstream of river mile (RM) 4. Data from the 1999 survey of chinook spawning in
the Cedar River shows the distribution of spawning by river mile (Mavros et ai. 1999). Eighty-
one percent of chinook redds were located above RM 6.5. Thus, in 1999, only 19 percent of
chinook in the Cedar River spawned between RM 1.0 and 6.5 (35 out of 180 redds) and 19 of
J:\11193.000 Boeing FSfTA\OO31Dmft Stream Study Report_S:t.doc 3
,-------------------------------------------------------------~--
• • ~~ Geomatrix
these were clustered around RM 5.4. No spawning is documented below RM 1.0·(Carrasco et
aI., 1998; Mavros et aI., 1999).
Chinook salmon produce the largest eggs of any of the Pacific salmon species (Healey, 1991),
and therefore their eggs have a small surface-to-volume ratio. This makes them more sensitive
to reduced oxygen in comparison to other salmon species. There is an apparent preference for
chinook to spawn in areas with high sub-gravel flow to ensure adequate dissolved oxygen for
developing embryos (Healey, 1991). Vronskiy (1972) observed that chinook tended to spawn
in specific locations in the Kamchatka River while ignoring other areas that appeared to offer
the same conditions. Similar factors may influence the spawning distribution of these fish in
the Cedar River. The conditions that lead to high volumes of sub-gravel flow may have a
greater influence on the spawning locations chosen by these fish than other factors such as
velocity, depth of water, or substrate composition.
Other wildlife may use the banks of the Cedar River where some vegetation exists to the east of
the project area. The species expected would likely be those acclimated to human disturbance
because of the surrounding land uses. These would likely include a variety of birds and small
mammals, primarily rodents. A review of the Natural Heritage Database records indicated that
there are no resources listed in the database in the project vicinity. A request has been made to
the Washington Department ofFish and Wildlife (WDFW) for Priority Species and Habitats
data in the project vicinity. We have not received this information at this time but will revise
this section of the report when the data are received from WDFW.
5.0 MEASURES TO PROTECT TREES
There are no trees on the project site or adjacent banks of the Cedar River. Therefore, there are
no measures to protect trees for the proposed proj ecl.
6.0 REFERENCES
Carrasco, K., S. Foley, B. Mavros and K. Walter, 1998, 1998 chinook spawner survey data
technical report for the Lake Washington watershed, King County Department of
Natural Resources, Washington Department ofFish and Wildlife, and Muckleshoot
Indian Tribal Fisheries Department.
Chrzastowski, M., 1983, Historical changes to Lake Washington and route of the Lake
Washington Ship Canal, King County, Washington, Department of the Interior, U.S.
Geological Survey, WRI 81-1182.
J:\l1193.ooo Boeing FSFf A \OO3\Draft Stn:am Study Report _Sx.doc 4
, • • i0f~ Geomatrix
Healey, M.C., 1991, Life history of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), Pages
311-394 in C. Groot and L. Margolis, editors, Pacific salmon life histories, UBC Press,
Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kiyohara, K., G. Volkhardt, 2007, Evaluation of Downstream Migrant Salmon Production in
2006 from the Cedar River and Bear Creek, Washington Department ofFish and
Wildlife, FPA-07-02, March.
Mavros, B., S. Foley, K. Burton and K. Walter, 1999, 1999 chinook spawner survey data
technical report for the Lake Washington watershed, King County Department of
Natural Resources, Washington Department ofFish and Wildlife, Seattle Public
Utilities, and Muckleshoot Indian Tribal Fisheries Department.
Vronskiy, B.B., 1972, Reproductive biology of the Kamchatka River chinook salmon
(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha [Walbaum]), J. Ichthyol, 12:259-273.
J:\I 1 193.000 Boeing FSFTA\OO3\Draft Stream 5rudy Report_Sx.doc 5
.'" • • • ~~ Geomatrix
TABLEt
HISTORICAL CEDAR RIVER SALMON SPAWNER SURVEY DATA
Fonner South Fire Training Area
Renton, Washington
Year Sockeye Steelhead Chinook
1964 348
1965 1,046
1966 1,752
1967 1,335
1968 1,363
1969 466
1970 1,745
1971 471
1972 419
1973 1,025
1974 560
1975 656
1976 416
1977 675
1978 890
1979 1,243
1980 1,360
1981 624
1982 253,658 ·2575 763
1983 193,338 2166 788
1984 336,960 2527 898
1985 223,745 2261 766
1986 217,133 2997 942
1987 177,841 2274 1,540
1988 359,000 1973 559
1989 162,000 1806 558
1990 76,000 1520 469
1991 77,000 599 508
1992 100,000 184 525
1993 76,000 76 156
1994 109,000 137 452
1995 22,000 234 681
1996 230,000 652 303
1997 104,000 608 227
1998 49,588 229 432
1999 22,138 48 241
2000 148,225 42 120
2001 119,000 44 810
2002 160,485 369
Notes:
I. Results are from unpublished data from the Washington
Department of Fish and Wildlife.
1:\11193.000 Boeing FSITA\003\Draft Stream Study Report_Sx.doc
----------------_ .. - -
• •
CITY OF RENTON
1055 S. Grady Way
________ R_en_to_n_._w_A_9_8_05_5 _____ ~.~~~~~~~
-.... '!.11~' Printed: 07-27-2007
Land Use Actions
RECEIPT
. }\l\.: .
~iC~\'J~O
Permit#: LUA07 -081
Payment Made: 07/27/200702:19 PM Receipt Number:
Total Payment: 1,000.00 Payee: GEOMATRIX
Current Payment Made to the Following Items:
Trans Account Code Description Amount
5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 1,000.00
Payments made for this receipt
Trans Method Description Amount
Payment Check 123710 1,000.00
Account Balances
Trans Account Code Description Balance Due
3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee
5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees
5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/waivers
5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat
5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees
5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review
5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat
5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat
5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD
5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees
5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment
5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks
5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone
5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt
5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev
5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval
5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use or Fence Review
5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees
5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee
5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend
5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies
5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable)
5954 650.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits
5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage
5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax
Remaining Balance Due: $0.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
R0703898