Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutL08S0021King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206·296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.klngcounty.gov FILE NO.: L08S0021 REVIEW PLANNER: SHANNON DORR REVIEW ENGINEER: CURT FOSTER APPLICATION FILED: FEBRUARY 29, 2008 Related Files: _____ _ A. ACTIONS SHORT PLAT TYPE2 . FILE.CONTENTS 1 · ·LOG".IN SH~ET ,, PROJECT/ FILE NAME: WILSON/EDWARDS SHORT PLAT OWNER(S): Frank & Mariorle Leighton AGENT(S): South Sound Engrg COMPLETE APPLICATION DATE: 2/29/08 1. D PRELIMINARY APPROVAL DATE:---------APPEALED: DYES D NO 2. D REVISION: 3. D RECORDING NO.:-------------- B. HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTIONS 1. D PREHEARING CONF. NOTICE date(s): 2. D HEARING NOTICE date(s): 3 D PREHEARING ORDER date(s): 4 D CONTINUATION date(s): 5. D EXAMINER'S REPORT date(s): 6 D RECONSIDERATION date(s): 7. D APPEAL SUMMARY date(s): C. DOES STAFF ACTIONS 1. D PRELIMINARY REPORT/ CONDITIONS date mailed: 2. D CONTINUATION NOTICE date mailed: 3. D ADDENDUM REPORT date mailed: 4. D NOTICE OF APPEAL date received: 5. D APPEALARGUMENTS date received: 6. D TRANSMITIAL TO EXAMINER (POR's/DOCS/STUDIES) date sent: (APPEALS ONLY) D. SEPA REQUIREMENTS @ (i) 2. 1. THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: ------DATE ISSUED: ---------- 2. DATE 500' RADIUS/AGENCIES/PORS/STAFF SENT: ---------------- 3. APPEAL FILED: D YES D NO a. APPELLANTS: ----------Date Received: ---- Date Received: ___ _ b. APPEAL ARGUMENTS: --------Date Received: ---- NOTICE REQUIREMENTS NOTICE OF APPLICATION (§l AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING/POSTING PACKAGE SENT.J@s/of REC'D <1/f J:'/t1J' @LEGAL ADS: SEATILE TIMES Date Published: 4/ijoJ' LOCAL (fwioo &~ Date Published: .J.tp-/tJf @ 500' RADIUS/AGENCIES/POR's/STAFF date(s) sent: -~~i .... 1;+A=-~ ... d' ______ _ NOTICE OF DECISION a. 500' RADIUS/AGENCIES/POR's/STAFF date(s) sent: ---------- .. , F. G. • APPLICATION Date received: Februa~ 29, 2008 1. D INTAKE CHECKLIST 2. D APPLICATION FEE 3. \&l APPLICANT DESIGNATION FORM 4. D LEGAL DESCRIPTION 5. ~ ASSESSOR'S MAPS: /Ju) 11J-,ij-tJJ 6. CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY 7. CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY 8. D PRELIMINARY HEALTH APPROVAL 9. D CERTIFICATE OF FUTURE CONNECTION 10. °f, FIRE DISTRICT RECEIPT 11. ¥-SITE PLAN/PLAT MAP 12. t LEGAL LOT PROOF 13. AFFIDAVIT CONCERNING CRITICAL AREAS COMPLIANCE 14. !ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ,-~cJ..u,..-, 15. TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY 16. '9i LEVEL &iE-DRAINAGE ANALYSIS 17. ¢'. OTHER .su/:,dt'/1. ~.,. DA')Junf#/b..,&f.u 18. ~ WAIVER(S) ;J+cpu:tf tU4,LlA-eU ADDITIONAL PLANS/MAPS DATES RECEIVED: 1. CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN 2. WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN 3. REVISION NO. 1 4. REVISION NO. 2 5. REVISION NO. 3 6. REVISION NO. 4 7. OTHER MAPS a) b) c) d) e) I) SPECIAL STUDIES 1. CD 3. 4. (i) WETLAND/STREAM REPORT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT TRAFFIC STUDY WILDLIFE STUDY 0TH ER ( document title) {!,.,.g;,t W {1/ILd.4 L::R.:i!A tn . lb ;Jrn.:f-' L08S0021 DATES RECEIVED Page 2 of 3 ·• .:, . I. GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. L08S002l 10. ______________________________ _ 11. ______________________________ _ 12. ______________________________ _ 13. ______________________________ _ 14. ______________________________ _ 15. ______________________________ _ 16. ______________________________ _ 17. ______________________________ _ 18. ______________________________ _ 19. ______________________________ _ 20. ______________________________ _ 21. ______________________________ _ 22. ______________________________ _ 23. _____________________________ _ 24. ______________________________ _ 25. ______________________________ _ 26. ______________________________ _ 27. ______________________________ _ 28. ______________________________ _ 29. ______________________________ _ 30. ______________________________ _ 31. ______________________________ _ 32. ______________________________ _ 33. ______________________________ _ 34. ______________________________ _ 35. ______________________________ _ 36. 37. ______________________________ _ 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. Page 3 of 3 ' CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Date: To: From: MEMORANDUM March 7, 2012 City Clerk's Office Stacy M Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office ii Project Name: WIison/Tran Short Plat :1 LUA (file) Number: LUA-09-109 I I Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Rocale Timmons Acceptance Date: Applicant: Brenda Tran Owner: Same as applicant Contact: Phil Kltzes ' PIO Number: 6196600520; 6196600540 I ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: I Administrative Denial: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: ' By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: , Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: 8-Lot Short Plat with 2 tracts submitted to King County but transferred to the City on 8-26-09 prior to a decision. City will need to process It as a full subdivision due to the number of lots and tracts. I Northeast corner 118'h Ave SE & SE 1SO'h Street i Location: II Comments: 1/17/12: Current Planning Manager sent cancellation letter due to inactivity. ,, ,, b Denis Law Mayor January 17, 2012 Brenda Tran 12055 SE 178th Street ·_Renton, WA .98058 Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator . SUBJECT: "Cancellation" Notice · · . Wilson Tran Short Subdivislon/LUA09~109, KC File No. L08S0021. Dear Ms. Tran: The Ci~y of Renton Planning Division accepted the aforementioned master application from King County Department of Development and Environmental Services (KCDDES) on August 31, 2009. The file includes correspondence from KCDDES dated May 1; 2008 and July 27, 2009. The May 1, 2008 letter requests additional information or studies needed in order to complete the review of the project, and places the application "on hold" · pending receipt of that information. The July 27, 2009 letter states that the information was not received despite the granting of two extensions .. That letter required that the additional information be submitted by August 27, 2009 and stated that failure to do so or to request an extension in writing by that date would result in the cancellati~n of the project. As there has been no action on the project since the last request for information in. th·e· July 21; 2009 letter, the project has be!a!n cancelled and the application is considered to be denied without prejudice. · · · . . If you choose to resubmit the application, you. will need to comply with cur'rent ·· · applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. , . . . . . Piease contact me at (425)430-7286 if you have any questions. · Sincerely, -· • · ~(u{{j/fiuy Jennifer Henning, AICP Planning Manager cc: Phil Kitzes, PK Enterprises, 23035 SE 263~ St, Maple Valley, WA 98038 C. E. 'Chip' Vincent, Plannlng Director Roca le lirTIITlons, Associate Planner Project File Renton City Hall •. i 055 5o_uth Grady Way. • Renton, Wa;hington98057 . • r_entonwa.gov ti King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 July 27, 2009 Brenda Tran 12055 SE 1781h Street Renton, WA 98058 RE: Application for Preliminary Short Plat DDES File No. L08S0021 -Wilson Tran Short Subdivision Dear Ms. Tran: On May 1, 2008, King County Land Use Services Division (LUSD) requested additional information required to continue processing the application referenced above. The deadline for the submittal of the requested information was August 1, 2008. Two requests for extensions were granted with the following deadlines: October 31, 2008 and December 31, 2008. When supplemental information is required, King County Code allows LUSD to specify a ,u, deadline for the submittal of such information or modifications. Applications shall be deemed withdrawn or canceled if requested information or modifications are not submitted within the time period specified in the written findings. If the required information is not submitted by August 27, 2009, this application will be canceled. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist, which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request, in writing, for consideration by this Department. Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If possible, please submit all of the information in one package. If you have any questions, regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please contact me at 206-296- 6686 or arlene.mariano@kingcounty.gov. Sincerely, ~11~ Arlene Mariano, Project/Program Manager I Current Planning Section, LUSD cc: Phil Kitzes, PK Enterprises, 23035 SE 263ro Street, Maple Valley, WA 98038 Lanny Henoch, Project/Program Manager Ill, Current Planning Section, LUSD Curt Foster, Engineer II, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Kris Langley, Traffic Engineer, Road Services Division, KCDOT Application File L08S0021 ' .. :, . -· .tQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov May 1, 2008 Brenda Tran 10255 SE 1781h Street Renton, WA RE: Notice of Request for Additional Information or Studies Application'No. L08S0021 -Wilson/Tran Short Plat Dear Ms. Tran: The purpose of this letter is to notify you pursuant to King County Code Title 20 that the Land Use Services Division is requesting additional information and/or studies to complete the review of your project. The information is described on the enclosed plat screening transmittal. When submitting the requested information, include a copy of the plat screening transmittal and retain a copy for your records. Provide a cover letter, which lists how each item, was addressed. Any clarification or explanation of the submittal can also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN.: Shannon Dorr, Project Manager II, Current Planning Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 If the submittal is hand delivered, submit at the address above. Your application is on "hold" from the date of this notice, until the date you are advised that the additional information satisfies this request or 14 days after the date the information has been provided. You will be notified if the Division determines that the information is insufficient. Please note that the supplemental information required after vesting of a complete application shall not affect the validity of such application. ' The deadline for the . Jmittal of the necessary informa. . n is August 1, 2008. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist, which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request, in writing, for consideration by this Department. Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If possible, please submit all of the information in one package. If you have any questions, regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-6673. Sh · non orr Program/Project Manager II Current Planning Section CC: Curt Foster, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Trishah Bull, Current Planning Section, LUSD Larry West, Critical Areas Section, LUSD Kris Langley, KCDOT Phillip Kitzes, PK Enterprises File tQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 ITY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Plat Screening Transmittal Preliminary Short Plat.-Wils~.j/Tran Short Plat· · t!USD File No, t.08S0021 .Date of lnformation,Request: May 1., 2008 Deadline for Submittal. oflnformation: August 1, 2008 Please submit 10 copies of the following required studies and/or preliminary plat map revisions. Access/Roadway -2007 King County Road Design and Construction Standards (KCRDCS) 1. Please provide a conceptual development and neighborhood circulation plan that incorporates tax lot 9025 (parcel ID #3323059025), to allow the STC to establish (a) the appropriate requirements for the frontage improvements to SE 180 Street for L08S0021 and the internal road configuration/access issues associated with L08S0021. This conceptual development and circulation plan should incorporate development of TL 9025 at the City of Renton's current development regulations for the parcel --and roadway design criteria. Depending on the results of the conceptual development and circulation plan, the following additional screening comments may be required (to accommodate the future development of the property to the east): • Dedication and half street improvements along the 120th Avenue SE frontage (extended) meeting the current alignment standards. • A re-constructed intersection at 120th Avenue SE and SE 180th Street, including a 25- foot property line radius. 2. 118th Avenue SE, fronting the property, is classified as an urban neighborhood-collector (Section 2.03 8). Urban frontage improvements are required (Section 1.05 B). These improvements can be designed after preliminary approval and submitted for engineering plan approval prior to recording or construction. A submittal is not required unless a variance is desired. 3. Access to Lots 1 and 2 shall be means of the Joint Use Driveway Tract (JUD -Section 3.01f). Your next submittal shall include a revised site map showing the JUD tract. 4. Sight distance along the frontage road (118th Avenue SE) may be less than required (Sections 2.12 and 2.13). For the next submittal, you need to: 1) demonstrate that minimum site distances are met, or 2) submit engineering plans after preliminary decision that correct the problem or 3) obtain a road variance approval. Site distances shall be measured and provided by either an engineer or land surveyor licensed in the State of Washington. 5. SE 180th Street, fronting the property, is classified as an urban sub-collector (Section 2.03 B). Urban frontage improvements are required (Section 1.05 8). A conceptual road plan (incorporating the recommendations from the traffic study) shall be included with the next submittal. 6. If a variance from the KCRDCS is desired (Section 1.12) the variance must be approved prior to making a decision on the short subdivision application. Multiple issues may be included in the same application. Information which explains the road variance process may be found at: www.metrokc.gov/ddes/perm_info.htm. Any request for a road variance shall be submitted to LOBS0021 -Wilsonfrran Short Plat Screening letter (1) Page 1 of 3 ODES on the appropriate form and with the minimum fee deposit. Wetland/Stream 7. The applicant must provide written clarification as to whether they are proposing buffer reduction at the western edge of the wetland. If it is proposed, then the applicant must provide written justification showing how the proposed short plat will meet the code requirement allowing a 25-foot buffer reduction. 8. ODES does not approve both buffer reduction and buffer averaging. If buffer averaging is proposed, the applicant must explain how the criteria in KCC 21A.24.325.C are met. 9. A conceptual mitigation plan must be provided to implement the provisions for wetland buffer averaging described above. 10. The plans must be revised to clarify the note about stream mitigation area (reserved). 11.A 15-foot building setback must be shown at the edge of the wetland and aquatic area buffers. Drainage -2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) 12. The route of the current flow path is not clear for storm water runoff as it crosses the neighboring property to the east. A revised Level I is required with the next submittal. 13. A wetland/stream is located on and/or near the property. Delineation of the 100-year floodplain is required (Section 1.3.2). A revised site plan with the delineated floodplain boundary is required with the next submittal. 14. The conceptual drainage plan proposes the use of a drainage facility located on a neighboring tax lot. SWDM adjustment approval is required with the next submittal for the off-site facility (Section 1.2.3). 15. The conceptual drainage plan, which is prepared, stamped, and signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington. This plan shall address the above items. Zoning 16. Please submit a conceptual recreation plan which indicates the type of improvements (i.e: sport court, play structure, benches, landscaping, etc.) proposed within the recreation tract. See KCC 21A.14.180 E2 for equipment requirements. Please note, any areas shown as landscape tracts and/or "openspace" shall not be counted/credited towards the recreation requirement of 390 square feet per lot. Survey 17. Proof of legal lot was not submitted with the application. The applicant shall submit proof of legal lot. School Walkways 18. Please provide a school walkway report, including a detailed inventory of the walkway routes to either (a) the serving schools, or, (b) the nearest school bus stops. The inventory shall include an overall aerial photograph of the walkway routes, ground-level photography --taken at regular intervals --of the conditions, detailed drawings identifying roadway conditions: traveled-way widths, shoulder widths and surfacing, potential hazards for school-age pedestrians (open ditches: depth, width, proximity to the paved roadway, etc; utility poles, LOBS0021 -Wilsonfrran Short Plat Screening letter (1) Page 2 of 3 mailboxes, sight-obscuring/walkway obstructing vegetation and utility services), from the end of required frontage irnrirovements to the school/school "'"S stop. Students will attend the following schools • Benson Hill Elementary -The students will walk • Nelson Middle School -The bus stop is located at SE 1841 h Street and 120u, Avenue SE • Lindbergh High School -The bus stop is located at SE 184 1 h Street and 120u, Avenue SE As a result of the review of the information, additional information (studies, revisions, etc.) may be requested at a later date. Further evaluation of these issues may result in the reconfiguration and/or loss of lots. L08S0021 -Wilsonrrran Short Plat Screening letter (1) Page 3 of 3 Online Search & Report ~~--,,~- 'iiyj;.mi!ll~ --~~~=~ ~S!D --~--·-··---------._ •,.•--------=- ~ -----.--,~---'. -·-=----------·-- . ~O(iXilliilll~. - @ifllmJ(iXilJiilll~ · Reports --· ---·~------~------·------~·· Billing notes %-·-~-----•M _______ _ Permit routing definitions Search tbol improvement Page I of3 Permit at a Glance Ent~r permit jL08S0021 or file number: - or Parcel ID number (PIN):L __________ _ 1s-10 digits, e.g .. 2123069016) I Submit J ntle I Permit routing I Building inspection I Comments I Related permit activitie5: I -_Ijtle Details of the permit itself Status definitions .. . . Contact Information Appllcant:iTRAN BRENDA & TOTO£ I-. ProJectN __ o 4 :(_L0_8_S_0_02_1 _____ 1 , --Status:IRET/WCI i . ............. 'i""'"'"""'"' ........ , •. _,,,.... • i T"tl .;WILSON TRAN SHORT , ' 1 8 "iPLAT : 'WILSON EDWARD & Applicant 12055 SE 178TH ST address: RENTON WA 98058 1.· ,--__ P __ e_rmlttype:_PRE-SP Sub-type: PRE-SP Assigned AMAR CFOS staff: ------- Contractor: ----------------------, ;Applied/Opened: 02/29/2008 -----Contractor 1-· · -------·· · ----· ... -. --· __ address:·-·-·---------·- ! Expiration Date:] > >> > > > > >>>> > >>> > [completed Date:! ! No. Lots:;8 I -· · ··· ··· ········ 1 -· --··· ···· -----· ········· I Valuation: $0.00 Site Information I_ Descrlption:,8 LOTS SHORT PLAT [ · Location & RN ,0, Permit routing ,o, Bulldlng.!nfil1ectlon function status ' Juris.: -·------··-----~--- Community SOOS CREEK Plan: Comp Plan: URBAN RES 4-12AC __ .• _ Owner:,LEIGHTON FRANK & MARJORIE Parcel No: 6196600520 (Link to ___ Parcel Viewer Map) ___ _ Link to: PrQRer:1)1 ReROrt Districts ReRort iMaR TILT.0.E Keyword: ____ irsearch keyword I PermltsPlus MOEJUD 3/21/2008 Recvd file 3/21/08 to process & disperse. BULLT 3/21/2008 Assigned to SDOR, CFOS, KLAN, LCAS, LWES MOEJUD 3/25/2008 MOEJUD changed status to PENDING on 03/25/2008 (added by script) MOEJUD 3/26/2008 Application Deemed Complete 2/29/08. Posting package http ://info .kingcounty. gov /property/permits/Penni tG Jance/(S(3ducfprnrj vokgaoqpkzk2j p)... 08/28/2009 Onlme Search & Report Page l. ot :; w/orig. ltr, Notice of Complete Application, mailed 3/25/08 to both applicants at: 17844 12oth Ave SE, Renton WA 98058. This address was verified per phone call. Posting package included jackets for two (2) boards along w/instructions as to where each s/b located. Mailed request w/info & site plan to Renton School District on 3/25/08. Posted to ODES web page & emailed S. Times and Renton Reporter to publish legal ad on Wed., 4/2/08. ECL checklist placed in tray for H. Reinert. MOEJUD 3/26/2008 Note: App complete 2/29/08. The following routed on 3/26/08: Planner file to assigned PPMII, SDOR; review packets to CFOS, TBUL, KLAN, RFLO, BMUD and LCAS & LWES via THIN. CASEYL 4/8/2008 Site visit 4-7-08. Screening comments to S Dorr today. Requesting clarification and compensatory mitigation plan. CASEYL 4/8/2008 Site reviewed under Critical Area Designation L07SA553 by A Gates. SIMMONSP4/9/2008 Sent survey comment to planner with no proof of legal lot MOEJUD 4/22/2008 Affidavit of Posting recvd 4/18/08; site posted 4/18/08; routed to main file. MOEJUD 5/1/2008 Ltr dated & mailed 05/01/08 from SDOR to Brenda Tran, requesting add'I info. Deadline for submittal of the info is 08/01/08. MOEJUD 5/1/2008 MOEJUD changed status to RET/WCI on 05/01/2008 (added by script) MUDDB 5/2/2008 SPRINKLERS REQUIRED IN ANY RESIDENCE DORRS DORRS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THIS SHORT PLAT UNLESS THE REQUIREMENT IS REMOVED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL. 7/29/2008 Extension granted; new deadline 10/31/08 10/28/2008 Applicant still negotiating with property owners; extension granted -new deadline 12/31/08 WESTLAR 3/9/2009 No geotechnical issues that need to be addressed prior to preliminary approval. Approved. HENOCHL 517/2009 Re-assigned to AMAR on 5/7/09. MARIANOA 7/27/2009 30 day cancellation letter mailed to Brenda Tran 07.27.2009 GOLLS GOLLS {deadline 08.27.2009) 7/28/2009 see office links pdf file 7/27/09 deadline ltr AMAR 8/26/2009 main file has been boxed up w/all extra copies of docs and routed to City of Renton via Paula Adams office on 8/26/09 -AMAR has a working file which will be kept as duplicates of all docs for our historical records no status updates as of 8/26/09 sent e-mail to SBOT & LHEN & KCLA requesting info on status PRMS routing DOES-PUBLIC 2/29/2008 Added to Project Management MAGATN 2/29/2008FINISHED at Permit Center MOEJUD 3/26/2008App Comp 2/29/08 MOEJUD 3/26/2008STARTED at Notice Of Application MOEJUD 3/26/2008 FINISHED at Complete Application MOEJUD 3/26/2008 STARTED at Current Planning Review MOEJUD 3/26/2008 STARTED at SEPA Review CASEYL 3/27/2008QUEUED at Land Use Wetlands Review FOSTERC 3/28/2008 Estimated 48 ERS hours due to site compllcations. FOSTERC 3/28/2008 FINISHED at Land Use Engineering FOSTERC 3/28/2008 E/M ERS est to TB BULLT 3/30/2008 BUDGET LOCKED FOSTERC 3/31/2008 Routed to Beth. FOSTERC 3/31/2008 FINISHED at Engineer Technician http ://info. kingcounty .gov/property/permits/Penni tG lance/(S(3ducfprnrj vokgaoqpkzk2 jp)... 08/28/2009 Online Search & Report FOSTERC CASEYL MOEJUD CASEYL CASEYL CASEYL CASEYL SIMMONSP SIMMONSP FOSTERC FOSTERC MOEJUD MUDDB CH ESH IE RB WESTLAR WESTLAR PRMS clock 313112008 QUEUED at Engineer Technician 41712008 STARTED at Land Use Wetlands Review 4/8/2008 FINISHED at Notice Of Application 418/2008 QUEUED at Land Use Wetlands Review 41812008 FINISHED at Land Use Wetlands Review 41812008 WAITOTHR at Land Use Wetlands Review 41812008 awaiting mitigation plan 4/912008 FINISHED at Land Use Survey Review 41912008 Comments 4/30/2008 WAITOTHR at Land Use Engineering 4130/2008 E/M Ser# 1 to SD 51112008 Rqst Add"I Info-deadline 08101/08 5/2/2008 FINISHED at Fire Engineering 511412008 FINISHED at Engineer Technician 31912009 FINISHED at Land Use Geotech 3/912009 FINISHED at Land Use Geotech DOES-PUBLIC 2/2912008 SYSTEM auto-started preclock at Permit Center. 3/2612008 FINISHED at CAPP BULLT 5/112008 WAITCUST at PLNR PRMS Milestone No comments available for L08S0021 -l> Related 11ermit activities on 11arcel For more information about categories and statuses used on reports, see: Page 3 ot:l I0...10!' • Category descrl11tlons for a list composition types and sub-types for each report grouping. Also refer to each permit !Ylll! for additional details. • Status definitions for general definitions for statuses such as pending, approved, finaled, etc. • Permit routing status definitions for general definitions for statuses that are used by PRMS -Permit routing management system. Please e-mail questions or comments to DDESWeblnguiries@kingcounty~gov. I Eermit information I FAQ I Ma11s~_Qroperty research I Forms &_11uJ:>lications I Codes, JlQlicies & growth man~gement I ~Qde Enforcement I Fire Marshal I Business licenses I About I gintact us I Site map Home I Privacy I Accessibility I Terms of use I l,_earch Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. © 2009 King County http ://info. kingcounty. gov /property /permi ts/Permi tG lance/(S(3ducfpmrjvokgaoqpk2k2 jp)... 08/28/2009 , ... ,.,.,.. Level 2 Downstream Analysis for the MAIN FILE COP't Wilson / Tran 8-Lot Short Plat · City ofRenton, King County Washingt~n February 25, 2008 Wilson / Tran 8-lol Short Plat Downstream Analysis . JL08S002l Praf!!lr@. E'!"glry~rt"91LLC 4328 SW'3ill~'street Federal Wey, WA 98023 Wilson/ Tran 8-Lot Short Plat A portion of the NW Yi of Section 33; Township 23 North, Range 5E, . . · Willamette Meridian. City of Renton, King County, Washington Prepared For: Brenda Tran 15437 139th Ave SE Renton, WA 98058 Phone: 425-235-6008 Contact: Edward Wilson Prepared By: Preferred Engineering, LLC 4238 SW 314th Street Federal Way, WA 98023 Phone: 206-501-5708 Fax: 413-208-6650 Contact: Steve Lee, PE Wilson/ Tran 8-Lot Short Plat Downstream Analysis Preferred Engineering, LLC 4328 SW 314° Slree( Federal Way, WA 98023 Table of Contents Introduction ...... : ...................................................... , ......................... : ...... , ............. · ............. I Review of Resources ......................................................... , ................................................. 4 Field Inspection and Downstream Analysis ..................................................................... 11 ,Preliminary Pre-developed and Post Developed Hydrologic Analysis ............................ 14 Existing Site Hydrology ................................................................................................ 14 Proposed Site Hydrology .............................................................................................. · 14 Summary ...... · ...................................... ,. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ... ... ... .. . .. ... .. . . . . . . . .... . .... . . . . .. . . . .. . . .. .. . ... 14 WIison I Tran 8-Lot Short Plat Downstream Analysis Preferred Engineering, LLC 4328 SW 314• Street Federal Way, WA 98023 Introduction This is the Level 2 Downstream Analysis for the Wilson / Tran Short Plat, located within a portion of Section 33, T9wnship 23 North, Range 5 East on the northeast comer of the· Ed Wilson property. The entire Wilson Property is comprised of parcel numbers 252305- 9012, 332305-9025, 332305-9021, 332305-9058, 332305-9048, 332305-9070, 619660- 0520, and 6 J 9660-0540. The Wilson / Tran Short Plat development consists of parcel 619660-0520 and 619660-0540 (See Figures I and 2) and is currently zoned R6. The North Plat for the Wilson property will be developed under a separate permit. The Wilson I Tran Short Plat will consist of eight single~ family residential lots with . paved access, stormwater drainage, detention and water quality, utilities, and landscape improvements. The existing houses and construction debris will be removed as part of the redevelopment. The Wilson I Tran Short Plat is located along I 18th Ave SE and 180th Street SE. To the north, south, and west are residential properties with single-family residences .. To the east is the remainder of the Wilson property and the Bonneville Power easement. The existing houses on the Wilson property east of the site will be removed and the proposed stormwater pond for the project will be located in this area. The proposed pond has been sized to accommodate future development of approximately 5 lots between the pond and · the 8-lot short plat. The existing project site consists of some forested areas, but predominately shrubs, grasses, and clearings. Slopes typically range from O to 10. Soils for the site consist of Alderwood gravelly, sandy loam (AgC). See Figure 3. Runoff on the site typically drains to the south and southeast to Big Soos Creek. Big Soos Creek enters the northwest comer of the Wilson property, crosses the existing gravel road, and meanders along the south boundary of parcel 332305-9021. Several wetlands have been identified on the site and are described in the Critical Areas Determination Report for the Wilson Construction· Site, prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc., and dated May 29, 2007. There are two seasonal streams downstream of the project site which are tributary to Big Soos Creek. WIison / Tran 114.ot Short Plat Downstream Analysis Prefemid Engineering, LLC 4328 SW 314~ Street Federal Way, WA 98023 Figure I -Vicinity Map Wilson / Tran 8-1.ot Short Plat Downstream Analysis 2 Preferred Engineering, LLC 4328 SW 314~ Street Federal Way, WA 98023 WIison / Tran 8-Lot Short Plat Downstream Analysis 3 U'MII ~ A,9,1 Una t~dAN• Im" ---ukn •nd Larve lthlan; -·-Trib.111.Landii P1rcal• P1rk• U"llric:~.n.d KCb>lllrlll :;:·.......-.-IKl-tt !! . .......-.-iw-• ··-... -.- IU.-LS·---DU-1 ::;:·---w,-1 iu-11,1...-,._-ou,-• -Ul·U-~-DU,-1 -•. , . ......_....-1111 ... - 11"4·..-W..•DU•- 11,4,...,.._.IDU,__ 11a,...-W,IDU•- IUll•~UDl-- ll·ll·~·Ol. ... - """·~:MDl,--··-~·IM.--.... ......,.._... ...... c,.~ ........ g ......... 11....-...... ··-- Preferred Engineering, LLC 4328 SW 314~ Street Federal Way, WA 98023 Review of Resources The following maps have been examined and attached herein (where applicable) as Figures: USDA NRCS King County Soils Survey: Soils for the site consist of Alderwood gravelly, sandy loam. See Figure 3. FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map: According to FEMA FIRM panel 53033C0983 F, dated May 16, 1995, the site exists primarily in Zone X (areas of minimal flooding). Areas Susceptible to Ground Water Contamination: The site is located in an area oflow risk for groundwater contamination. See Figure 5. Critical Area Ordinance Basin Condition: The site is located in a basin of medium condition. See Figure 6 . . Seismic Hazard Area Maps: The site is not located within in a Seismic Haz.ard Area. Landslide Hazard Area Maps: The project site .is not within a landslide hazard area. Erosion Hazard Area Maps: The project site is not located within an erosion haz.ard area. Wetland Inventory Maps: According to the King County Wetland Survey and the National Inventory Wetland, there are no wetlands onsite (See Figure 8). However, several wetland · areas were identified during a recent critical areas determination by a wetland biologist. Refer to the Critical Areas Determination Report for the Wilson Construction Site, prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc., and dated May 29,2007. WIison / Tran &-Lot .Short Plat Downstream Analysis 4 Prvfem>d Engineering, UC 4328 SW 314~ Street Federal Way, WA 98023 Figure 3 -NRCS King County Soil Survey (Source: USDA Web Soil Survey) Wilson/ Tran 8-Lot Short Plat Downstream Analysis 5 Preferred Engineering, LLC 4328 SW 314• Street Federal Way, WA 98023 Bl I/ r ~, J ,vENue HEAST UTHEAST £l w 5 iE ~ SOUTHEAST SE UMIT OF DET~llED STUDY ZONE X §OUTHEAST -180TH STA ~ ~ r ~ 15 "' w :, z ~ r ~ 1! 184TH STREET /;;:"\ 122ND PLACE SOUTHEAST EET ~ ~ r ~ :, S1 w :, z ~, ~ "' SOUTHEAST r /174TH LANE § w :, "' z w ~ 122ND AVENUE r LANE /SOUTHEAST t;; ,.-:--... l:! ~ soUT~~T 17_81~ '% so~""" ~t ~I 33 '5 0 "' w :, z w ~ ~ \ ... I SOUTHEAST 184TH STREET JOINS PANEL 0991 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 500 0 500 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURAIICE PROGRAM A.DOD INSURANCE RATE MAP KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS ~PANEL~ ---- MAP NUMBER 53033C0983 F MAP REVISED: MAY 16, 1995 Federal Emergency Manqcmcnt Agency Thi• I• an offlcllll copy or• portion of the abow r.ferenced flood map. It wa extracted 1Alng F--MIT On-Uno. ll'ia map doo9 not relect cti.ngea or amendmenta which may h-been made aut.equer'lt to the date on the tltla block. For the latnt product inl'armation about National Flood lnsu.ranca Prognam lood mapa chee.k the FE~ Fl~ _Mao Store at www.msc.ferna.~ Wilson / Tran 8-Lot Short Plat Downstream Analysis 7 g 0-.AWdb •· a-.o"* A ~W6 r, County......,,. Hlghw•Y• i I i ! i I l O Parcels ! 0 Groundw;atar Management) AnlH j 0 Lakes and Large Rh1era /,/ -·-~ Anills Buac:eptabM to Groundw.ltar Contamination ... Preferred Engineering, LLC 4328 SW 314~ Street Federal Way, WA 98023 Wilson/ Tran 8-LotShort Plat Down-am Analysis ' 8 .# lncorpcntad Ania ...... '; -....... '! .__ D Parcai. 0 LakH and Large Rivers ,"/ llnlams Pl8farrad Engineering, LLC 4328 SN 314• Street Federal Way, WA 98023 Figure 7 -Seismic Hazard Area Map (Source: King County iMap) Wllson / Tran 8-Lot Short Plat Downstream Analysis . 9 Preferred Engineering, LLC 4328 &N 314" Street Federal Way, WA 98023 · WIison I Tran 8-Lot Short Plat Downstream Analysis 10 Streets CJ Parcel• 0 Lll&H and large ftiveR ;/ 8tr11.;111u WDllandli (1HO Survey) ·-----· ----jv lnaorporatad Area 200! .Cator Aerilll Photos Preferred Engineering, LLC 4328 SW 314~ Street Federal Way, WA 98023 Field Inspection and Downstream Analysis A site inspection was conducted on Friday February 1, 2008. The weather was 46 degrees and cloudy. See Figure 11 for downstream analysis map .. There are two seasonal flow streams that originate downstream of the site which combine within one quarter mile and flow into Big Soos Creek. Big Soos Creek crosses Petrovitski Rd. (SE 176th St.) and enters the Wilson property at · the northwest comer. At this point, the channel is narrow and seems to contain mostly seasonal flow. Overbanks consist of flat, wide grassy areas and some shrubs. The channel is highly vegetated and in fair condition. The first tributary originates from a culvert in a wetland east of lots 1 and 2 (see Figure 9). It appears to be a man-made ditch that flows downhill to the east and then turns north into neighboring property. The ditch is heavily vegetated and is lined by dense shrubs . and blackberries. At the approximate midpoint of the Wilson property, the ditch turns east and crosses a gravel road via a 12" RCP culvert. The 12" culvert appears to be in good condition and is filled approximately 50% with sediment. Downstream of the 12" culvert, the stream continues to flow east through a clearing to a junction with the second tributary. The second tributary is a manmade ditch that originates from a construction yard east of · the. main structure on the Wilson property (see Figure 9). There is an 8" culvert at the upstream end of the ditch that appears to drain the existing construction yard. The ditch flows east and then turns north, meandering through an open field consisting primarily of grass and shrubs before flowing through two 12" culverts and then through two 8" culverts which are located side by side. The ditch becomes more defined downstream of the twin culverts and is approximately 1-2' deep. Downstream of the culverts the ditch meanders north through heavy brush and . dense grass before joining with the first tributary and continuing approximately 190' to a junction with Big Soos Creek. Downstream of the junction with the tributary, Big Soos Creek continues along the proposed south line of the North Wilson Plat (see Figure 9). This portion of the creek is · heavily vegetated, shallow, and discharges into a wetland area. The creek then flows easterly across neighboring residential properties, alternating from submerged wetland to shallow channel until it crosses I 22"d Pl SE via a 30" CMP culvert (see Table 1 ). The culvert is in good condition and is filled roughly 50% with sediment. Downstream of the 122"d Pl Culvert, the channel continues eastward through dense vegetation to Soos Creek Park and the limit of the downstream study. Wllsbn / Tran 8-Lot Short Plat Downstream Analysis 11 Preferred Engineering, LLC 4328 &/11314~ Street Federal Way, WA 98023 No. 1A 2A 3A 18 28 38 48 58 68 Flow Direction Description Distance (feet) Shallow channel emerging from culvert downhill of E ro edlots 1 &2. o 18" Cone. Culvert. 50% E Obstructed 863 Shallow channel with grassy overbanks. Junction with E ditch from the south. 1129 Shallow ditch east of E construction ard. O -12" culverts along ditch part1a11y obstructed by N sediment and debris. 309 win 8" culverts partially blocked by debris and N sediment. · 497 Junction with ditch to the N east. 794 30" CMP culvert crossing 122nd Pl SE. Culvert partially obstruct~d by E debris. 1606 Shallow channel. Dense vegetation consisting mostly of various shrubs and E / SE blaekberries 1606+ Wilson/ Tran 8-1.ot Short Plat Downstream Analysis 12 Condition Good Good Good Fair Fair Fair Good Good Good Preferred Engineering, LLC 4328 fNol 314. Street Federal Way, WA 98023 "--ICV1S I O N S A PORTION OF THE S .W . 1/4 OF SEC. 14, TWN. 21 N., AGE. 4 E ., W.M. ND. DC:IIQIIIIPflDN -. .... ff KING COUNTY, RENTON, WASHINGTON ........ ~ "' ., '!!' ;~t;t ~l"'j ~~~ -~ ·--,_ _, ~ I ~ .. .. ! . i5 I ~ g u if~ i :j c; ~ Ji i QZ: Ii I !~ i II "'.f a I d 6'1.e < 3' g ::, 0 0 C> z Si: 0) ~ I- <{ <{ z _J <{ a.. ~ I w I-~ ::J 0 z ~ en 0 z 0 ... z w a: JOB NO., 20000729 OWC. MAME: OCSlCHI:D BY; S1t DRAWN B'f": .., PROJECT SIT E CHCCK[l) BY: S1t """" 2/11/llll ""n: O' "'""' 1 OF 2 SHU',; Preliminary Pre-developed and Post Developed Hydrologic Analysis The following is a preliminary quantitative analysis of pre and post-developed conditions per Core Requirement #2, Section 1.2.2.1. Existing Site Hydrology · It appears that there is minimal offsite flow onto the site. See Figure IO for the existing basin drainage map. Runoff from the site generally flows in an easterly direction to the two existing tributaries of Big Soos Creek. Onsite slopes generally vary from O to 10%. Total site area is approximately 1.39 acres. Refer to the attached table for a summary of existing flows. Proposed Site Hydrology The proposed development consists of nine single-family lots, individual roof downspout systems, asphalt roadway with rolled concrete curb, concrete sidewalk, storm drainage, and a combination water quality and detention pond. See Figure 11 for the developed basin drainage map and the attached KCRTS output for the peak runoff values under developed conditions. Runoff from lots I and 2 flows directly to the existing wetland to the east. The proposed detention pond has been designed to over-detain runoff from lots 3-8 to mitigate for the bypassed flow from lots I and 2. The proposed detention and water quality pond will utilize a level spreader to discharge stormwater to the wetland on the east side of the site. The proposed pond has been designed to provide detention for 50% of the 2-year to the I 00-year storm events. See the attached information for a summary of the detention and water quality facility. Summary Stormwater runoff from the proposed 8 Jot short plat will be conveyed via individual roof downspout systems and an enclosed storm drainage system to a combination water quality and detention pond. The pond has been designed to provide stormwater treatment for pollution generating impervious areas and detention above the water quality pool with approximately 1.0 feet of freeboard. Stormwater is discharged from the pond to wetland areas on the east side of the property via a level spreader, which should prevent erosion. It does not appear that there are any existing flooding problems. Therefore, designing a detention system to meet existing conditions should not provide any adverse impacts to the proposed project and the surrounding property. Wilson / Tran 8-Lot Short Plat Downstream Analysis 14 Preferred Engineering, LLC 4328 SW 314'" Slreet Federal Way, WA 98023 LEGEND ~ PRO..ECT SITE ME.A PRD.E:T SITE BCll.lmMY ™ ~ASSEJ) OFFSITE A A PORTION OF THE S.W.1/4 OF SEC.14, TWN. 21 N., AGE. 4 E., WM. KING COUNTY, RENTON, WASHINGTON ~{'---~'--\,,_~' / I -\,,. NORTH '\ j f ~ --\j:: 1 , , 1 I ;----------r ----------r----------111 ) \ I I I • I TOTAL AREA = 0.023 ACRES IMPERVIOUS = 0 ACRES 1 PERVIOUS = 0.023 ACRES / FOREST = 0.010 ACRES GRASS = 0.023 ACRES1 ,--, I I I I I I f 1 _.,,, /-1--.... , \ I I l I • .:~a:::L_ I ..... ,_ :: I I f ' J U !b ·\ I I I . 1 ,, I I · \....,, . BYPASS AREA TOTAL AREA = 0.287 ACRES IMPERVIOUS= 0 ACRES PERVIOUS = Q287 ACRES FOREST = 0.287 ACRES GRASS = 0 ACRES PROPOSED BYPASS AREA TOTAL AREA= Q287 ACRES IMPERVIOUS= Q157 ACRES PERVIOUS = 0.13 ACRES FOREST= QOO ACRES GRASS = 0.13 ACRES I / { • ··t-J L_.-J ------"' ~-=-T ~ ·--::., \ ~ -\ CZ . \ . . -r--.;;: _____ _ ----~ I -- ,.... I I I r, I I \ I\>=-,, --, I ,l I I '-I ,, SR~JE.tr 15JM8:: . ~ ---DFTS1TE1 ----, TOT AL AREA = 0.345 ACRES IMPERVIOUS= Q276 ACRES PERVIOUS = 0.069 ACRES FOREST = 0.000 ACRES GRASS = 0.069 ACRES I I ~ --------I -- --? . ·-I I ,-----~ ---, --· .;eBOBDSED r-, I ,-, I r, I ' !TOTAL AREA= 0.75 ACRES I I 1 1 I I I I -J IMPERVIOUS = 0 .44 ACRES I I L _j I I I I . 1 PERVIOUS = 0.31 ACRES L -1 1 -1 1 1 r _ _ _ _ _ , • , FOREST = o ACREs r 1 1 l ~ I GRASS = 0.31 ACRES I I I EXISTING LANDUSE AREA 1 1 TOTAL AREA = 0.75 ACRES I I · 1 IMPERVIOUS = 0 ACRES PERVIOUS = 0.75 ACRES FOR EST = 0.75 ACRES GRASS = 0 ACRES IIITEI EXISTNi CALDLATIDNS Ill MIT DCUJIIE N'DNm.lS 1C1JSC III a,.va Nl/£AS. SCALE• = 40' , ' - ,.- I I I I \\ \ \ \ .. £VtSIONS Na.~~T[ ... . ........ ii\ 11NC~ mi ~"":"ll!!l{I) -~"" ,_ ~, ~ I !~ ~~ I ~ I j cS l Ii ; ;! ti I !~ I "'f a ri I d "'"" ! 6 z :i: i l:: z 0 8 w ~ en en z 0 0 a. E 0 0 a: j z 0 a. 0.. 0 +~ ~ :) C, 0 Q z Zen j ~ X w z ~ z ..., a: .IOe NO.: """"'21 ,_ NAM£, DCStCNED 8"1': sn. DM.WN !IY: 007 Ct<Ct<ED 9"r. sn. """' 2/11/DS °""' or .... INT · 2 OF 2 5'1C£T'S EXISTING AND PROPOSED AREAS AND FLOWRATES (LEVEL II ANALYSIS) BASIN DESCRIPTION Bypass Area : (Total) (Impervious) (Pervious: Forest) (Pervious: Grass) Offsite A: (Total) (Impervious) (Pervious: Forest) (Pervious: Grass) Offsite B: (Total) (Impervious) (Pervious: Forest) (Pervious: Grass) SOlJTH·PLA.T PllOJECf .. EXISTING 100 YR PROPPSED AREA EXISTING AREA (acres) FLOWRATE (~ere~) {cu,ft/sec) 0.287 · 0.287 0 0.157 0.287 0 0 0.130 0.023 0.023 0 0 0.010 0.010 0.023 0.023 0.345 0345 0.276 0.276 0 0 0.069 .0.069 ::~!i~;S,6,7,8,&Park 0 _750 0.75 (Impervious) O 0.44 (Pervious: Forest) 0.81 0 (Pervious: Grass) O 0.31 lOOYR PROPOSED FLOWRATE. lcu•ft/sec)·. C(~ervi9us:· Forest) ;'i'·: \.' .f.037 '· ,-'e. , : '· ' '· ,,. . ·: O'.: .. ( . , }•'/·, ·. ,' (Pervious: Grn~s): ,, , .: ; 0.069' ··'. '" . 0.509 ,: . • · , .. ,.,. Note: See basin map provided within the Appendix. Existing and Developed Flowrates from Proposed Proiect Site: ''· "'l ':Return Stor1t1. T·"',t · . Existinli]Flow.tatc:{cfs);, . · il>'e'vefoncd FlowrateXcfsf; i +¥'~ 2 year 0.085 0.257 IO year 0.124 0.309 25 year 0.129 0.33 50 year 0.188 0.457 100 year 0.218 0,520 KCRTS Electronic File Names: KCRTS Electronic File Names: South Plat Existing Landuse: SthEx l.tsf South Plat Existing Landuse Output Hydrology File: .SthEx I.out South Plat Proposed Landuse: SthPrl.tsf South Plat Proposed Land use: SthPr I.out ,·· 1,1:,'i.,;:::,1;: '.·, •·. ·l··>'·PR'@J E'.etl:"1 N FORl\i1i>;Jrl Oi(f ·/'KCR~s 'H¥DROGRA8t,FiNF?tJt'sP.fEEf,'tt ,;i11,~~1'!?:t:=~;:"H, ~:.:it:t.~ ,j.,. • .• ',' _, "} -:· i ,1 4-, ' -'' 1. • -~ -..:.i..__~/L::...........~~..::..J.:x.-.} ' ~.:.... .. ..:........1~,.st:J:J;..,..;i,'l~ilfa#'.;.fa::;b.ii!~ P,~Q;J,EQ'fl<.,,, (" ,·, /,' .. , lw1LSON PLAT: SOUTH PLAT, RENTON, WA DATE: 21-Feb-08 PRQJECT.L.OCA,TION: ,l X SEATAC LANSBURG Sea/a Factor: 1.0 (Check One) SOIL. TYPE: ' ·r:. n SCSTYPE: Alderwood Soils (Circle One) I Till I Outwash AREAS:· ,:.; .I ·t ':·,/, 'i ''._;_ '": ::..":~~'. ~-~t~ . Fo·r 01Sturb~d!Area/~{·:fl,_l'.;~"' ~ ·1_'.~:./:u,,· ~~1. i'f.-' \iJ ~h.'~ --~~;t~1 ' l~-' '· ' ,",' ' -~ _,-t., ,. ' Existing: Tifl Forest 1.037 Acres Developed: Till Forest . Acres Till Pasture 0.069 Acnes Till Pasture Acres Till Grass Acres Till Grass 0.509 Acnes Outwash Forest Acnes Outwash Forest Acres Outwash Pasture Acnes Outwash Pasture Acres Outwash Grass Acnes Outwash Grass Acres Wetland Acres Wetland Acres Impervious 0.287 Acres Impervious 0.884 Acres 1.393 TOTAL 1.393 TOTAL [ ,;,'.;· :·"\ .~ '.~--EX1Siih~ -'--~-:J:· .:~--~ J ~.···/_ '~ f~~itr"S.:li;~~·~~o~Ve1d~'C;~,1'4Jr_:,~~.'..l~ PEAK VAllUES,AND RETURN PERIODS:, J Rank Return Period Peak (CFS) Rank Return Period Peak (CFS) 1 100 0.218 1 100 0.520 c,. 100 YEAR FLOW= 0.302 2 25 0.129 2 25 0.33 cfs 3 10 0.124 3 10 0.309 4 5 0. 12 4 5 0.273 5 3 0.115 5 3 0.273 6 2 0.085 6 2 0.257 7 j,3 0.08 7 1.3 0.227 8 1. 1 0.072 8 1. 1 0.21 50 0.188 50 0.457 First Interval cutoff= 50% of Exist 2 yr flow = 0.0425 rval size= (exist 50 yr flow M 50% Exist 2yr flow)/ 35 = 0.00416 PElJ;!;!fil!?N REQUiRED?,,.:,,? ''.':, :;:; ;J:: ,, · ;'1;/11 I Yea I No Time Step: 15MMinute Date Type: Historic (Circle One) I Hourly l(Circfe One) IReduced LEVEL OF DETENTION: • 1 . .l 3 (Circle One) WATEM!lALIT,Y TREATMENT,;\ . .,, ',•'flJ ' a'I ~' Req'd? j I Type? (Check One) Yes Basic I Kent: New Dev. I Secondarv Treatment No Sensitive Lake Volume= 4 723.:1 cf (see calcs on next page) Resource Stream {Use of Bioswale T reatmenl) OiNDSlllDE'ft~RD'l;)~INA'GE:.\REA:;::J Yes j No j Filenames used: SthEx1.tsf Additional Key Info: SthEx1.out SthPr1.tsf SthPr1.out Qefine Initial Orifice Coafigyration: rdout.out Qmax(Orif #1) = 4/3 • {1/2 Of 2 Year) = 0.056667 eQnd.out Initial Height of Orif. #2 = 3/4 of Stor. Depth = 2.625 ~et.dur . "' ~ ci 0 '"'. 0 ~ Cl) u. a, () Cl ~ 0 G) Cl .... al "' .c Cl tJ 0 (/) i5 .!; ci "' 0 ci 0 Cl 0 10 -5 10 -4 10 _, Probability Exceedence rdout.dur <> target.dur • Duration comparison Ana~lsis Base File: sthexl,tsf New File: rdout.tsf Cutoff units: Discharge in CFS Cutoff 0.044 0.050 0.057 0.064 0.070 0.077 0.083 0.090 0.097 0.103 0.110 0.116 0.123 -----Fraction of Time----- ease New %Change 0.47E-02 0.25E-02 -47.4 0.33E-02 0.22E-02 -32.5 0.24E-02 0.20E-02 -16.8. 0.18E-02 0.18E-02 0.9 0.14E-02 0.15E-02 5.9 O.lOE-02 0.12E-02 17.2 0.86E-03 0.lOE-02 18.9 0.62E-03 0.78E-03 26.3 0.42E-03 0.52E-03 23.1 0.33E-03 0.31E-03 -5.0 0.18E-03 0.16E-03 -9.1 · 0.82E-04 0.33E-04 -60.0 0.49E-04 O.OOE+OO -100.0 compare ---------check of Tolerance------- Probability Base New l!Change 0.47E-02 0.044 0.037 -15.9 0.33E-02 0.050 0.038 -25.0 0.24E-02 0.057 0.045 -20.2 0.18E~02 0.064 0.064 0.5 0.14E-02 0.070 0.073 3·.5 O.lOE-02 0.077 0.083 7.8 0.86E-03 0.083 0.087 4.0 0.62E-03 0.090 0.094 4.2 0.42E-03 0.097 0.100 3.8 0.33E-03 0.103 0.103 -0.4 0.18E-03 0.110 0.109 -0.8 0.82E-04 0.116 0.114 -1.6 0.49E-04 0.123 0.116 -5.7 MaXimum positive excursion a 0.006 cfs ( 8.1%) , occurring at 0.077 cfs on the Base oata:sthexl.tsf and at 0.083 cfs on the New oata:rdout.tsf Maximum negative excursion a 0.016 cfs Cc28.SS) occurring at 0.054 cfs on the Base oata:sthexl.tsf and at 0.038 cfs on the New oata:rdout.tsf Page 1 Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Side Slope: Pond Bottom Length: Pond Bottom Width: Pond Bottom Area: Top Area at 1 ft. FB: Effective Storage Depth: Stage O Elevation: Storage Volume: Riser Head: Riser Diameter: Number of orifices: Detention Pond 2.50 H:lV ss.oo· ft 25.00 ft 1375. sq. 4675. sq. ft ft 0.107 acres 5.00 ft 100.00 ft 12917. cu. ft 0.297 ac-ft s.oo ft 12.00 inches 2 Orifice # Height (ft) 0.00 2.95 Diameter (in) 0.90 1.55 Full Head Discharge (CFS) 0.049 0.093 Pipe Diameter (in) 1 2 Top Notch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None Stage Elevation Storage (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) 0.00 100.00 a. 0.000 0.01 100.01 14. 0.000 0.02 100.02 28. 0.001 0.03 100.03 41. 0.001 0.04 100.04 55. 0.001 a.as 100.05 69. 0.002 0.06 100.06 83. 0.002 0.07 100.07 97. 0.002 0.18 100.18 254. 0.006 0.28 100.28 401. 0.009 0.38 100.38 552. a. 013 0.48 100.48 707. 0.016 0.58 100.58 866. 0.020 0.68 100.68 1030. 0.024 0.78 100.78 1198. 0.028 0.88 100.88 1371. 0.031 0.98 100.98 1547. 0.036 1. 08 101. 08 1729. 0.040 1.18 101.18 1915. 0.044 1. 28 101. 2 8 2105. 0.048 1. 38 101.38 2300. 0.053 1.48 101.48 2500. 0.057 1. 58 101.58 2705. o .. 062 1. 68 101.68 2914. 0.067 1. 78 101.78 3128. a. on 1.88 101.88 3347. 0.077 1. 98 101.98 3571. 0.082 2.08 102.08 3800. 0.087 4.0 Discharge Percolation (cfs) (cfs) 0.000 0.00 0.002 0.00 0.003 0.00 a. 004 0.00 0.004 0.00 0.005 0.00 0.005 0.00 0.006 0.00 0.009 0.00 0.012 0.00 0.013 0.00 0.015 0.00 0.017 0.00 0.018 0.00 0.019 0.00 0.021 0.00 0.022 0.00 0.023 o.oo 0.024 0.00 0.025 0.00 0.026 0.00 0.027 0.00 0.028 o.oo 0.028 0.00 0.029 0.00 0.030 0.00 0.031 0.00 0.032 0.00 Surf Area· (sq. ft) 1375. 1379. 1383. 1387. 1391. 1395. 1399. 1403. 1448. 1489. 1531. 1573. 1615. 1659. 1702. 1746. 1791. 1836. 1882. 1928. 1975. 2022. 2069. 2118. 2166. 2215. 2265. 2315. 2.18 102.18 4034. 0.093 0.032 0.00 2366. 2.28 102.28 4273. 0.098 0.033 o.oo 2417. 2.38 102.38 4518. 0.104 0.034 0.00 2469. 2.47 102.47 4742. 0.109 0.035 o.oo 2516. 2.57 102.57 4996. 0 .115 0.035 o.oo 2568. 2.67 102.67 5256. 0.121 0.036 0.00 2621.. 2. 77 . 102. 77 5520. 0 .127 0.037 0.00 2675. 2.87 .102.87 5791. 0.133 0.037 0.00 2729. 2.95 102.95 6011. 0 .138 0.038 0.00 2773. 2.97 102.97 6066. 0 .139 0.038 0.00 2784. 2.98 102.98 6094. 0.140 0. 040 0.00 2789. ·3.00 103.00 6150. 0 .141. 0.042 o.oo 2800. 3.01 103.01 6178. 0.142 0. 046 0.00 2806. 3.03 103.03 6234. 0.143 0.051 0.00 2817. 3.05 103.05 6291. 0.144 0.056 0.00 2828. 3.06 103.06 . 6319. 0 .145 0.060 o.oo 2833. 3.08 103.08 6376. 0.146 0.062 0.00 2844. 3.18 103.18 6663. 0.153 0.070 0.00 2900. 3.28 103.28 6956. 0.160 0.077 o.oo 2956. 3.38 103.38 7254. 0.167 0.083 o.oo 3013. 3.48 103.48 7558. 0.174 0.088 0.00 3070. 3.58 103.58 7868. 0.181 .o. 093 0.00 3127. 3.68 103.68 8184. 0.188 0.098 o.oo 3·186. 3. 78 103.78 8505. 0.195 0.102 0.00 3244. 3.88 103.88 8833. 0.203 0.106 0.00 3303. 3. 98 103.98 9166. 0 .210 0 .110 0.00 3363. 4.08 104.08 9505. 0 .218 0 .114 0.00 3423. 4 .18 104.18 9851. 0.226 0 .117 0.00 3484. 4.28 104.28 10202. 0.234 0 .121 0.00 3545. 4.38 104.38 10560. 0.242 0.124 0.00 3607. 4.48 104.48 10923. 0.251 0.127 0.00 3669. 4.58 104.58 11293. 0. 259 0.130 0.00 3731. 4.68 104.68 11670. 0.268 .0 .133 0.00 ·3795. 4.78 104.78 12052 .. 0.277 0 .136 0.00 3858. 4.88 104.88 12441. 0.286 0.139 0.00 3922. 4.98 104.98 12837. 0. 295 0 .142 0.00 3987. 5.00 105.00 12 917. 0. 297 0 .142 0.00 4000. 5.10 105.10 13320. 0.306 0.453 0.00 4065. 5.20 105.20 13730. 0.315 1.020 0.00 4131. 5.30 105.30 14146. 0.325 1.750 0.00 4197. 5.40 105.40 14569. 0.334 2.550 0.00 4264. 5.50 105.50 14999. 0.344 2.830 0.00 4331. 5.60 105.60 15435. 0.354 3.090 0.00 4399. 5.70 105.70 15879. 0.365 3. 320 0.00 4467. 5.80 105.80 16329. 0.375 3.550 o.oo 4536. 5.90 105.90 16786. 0.385 3.750 0.00 4605. 6.00 106.00 .17250. 0.396 3. 950 0.00 4675. ·6 .10 106.10 17721. 0.407 4 .140 0.00 4745. .6 .20 106.20 18199. 0. 418 4.320 0.00 4816. 6.30 106.30 18684. 0.429 4.490 0.00 4887. 6.40 106.40 19177. 0.440 4.650 0.00 4959. 6.50 106.50 19676. 0.452 4.810 0.00 5031. 6.60 106.60 20183. 0.463 4.960 0.00 5104. 6.70 106.70 20697. 0.475 5·.110 0.00 5177. 6.80 106.80 21218. 0.487 5.260 0.00 5251. 6. 90 106.90 21747. 0. 499 5.400 0.00 5325. 7.00 107.00 22283. 0.512 5.540 0.00 5400. Hyd ·Inflow Outflow Peak Target Cale Stage Elev 1 0.52 0.22 0 .14 4.77 104.77 2 0.33 *****"** 0.11 3 .. 98 103.98 3 0.27 ******* 0.10 3.77 103.77 4 o. 26 ******* 0.12 4.19 104.19 5 0.31 ******* 0.09 3.60 103.60 6 0.27 ******* 0.06 3.05 103.05 7 0. 21 ******* 0. 03 2.34 102.34 8 0.23 ******* 0.03 1. BS 101.85 Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:sthprl.tsf Outflow Time Series File:rdout Inflow/Outflow Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: 0.520 CFS Peak Outflow Discharge: 0.136 CFS Peak Reservoir Stage: 4. 77 Ft Peak Reservoir Elev: 104.77 Ft at at Peak.Reservoir Storage: 12031. Cu-Ft 0.276 Ac-Ft Storage (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 12031. 0.276 9177. 0. 211 8476. 0.195 9880. 0.227 79.16. 0.182 6302. 0.145 4432. 0.102 3282. 0.075 6:00 on Jan 9 in 11: 00 on Jan 9 in Flow Duration from Time Series File:rdout.tsf Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Exceedence_Probability CFS % % % 0.002 42795 69.790 69.790 30.210 0. 302E+OO 0.005 3853 6.283 76.073 23.927 0.239E+OO 0.008 3153 5.142 81. 215 18.785 O.lBBE+OO 0. 012 2410 3.930 85.145 14.855 0.149E+OO 0.015 2876 4.690 89.835 10.165 0.102E+OO 0.018 1860 3.033 92.869 7 .131 0.713E-01 0.021 1179 1. 923 94. 791 5.209 0.521E-01 0.025 1150 1.875 96.667 3.333 0.333E-01 0.028 688 1.122 97.789 2 .211 0.221E-01 0.031 549 0.895 98.684 1. 316 0 .132E-01 0.034 352 0.574 99.258' 0.742 0.742E-02 0.038 246 0.401 99.659 0. 341 0.341E-02 0.041 51 0.083 99.742 0.258 · 0. 258E-02 0.044 7 0 .011 99.754 0.246 Q.246E-02 o·. 04B 11 0.018 99.772 0.228 0.228E-02 0.051 4 0.007 99.778 0.222 0.222E-02 0.054 6 0.010 99.788 0.212 0.212E-02 0.057 7 0. 011 99. 799 0.201 0.201E-02 0.061 6 0.010 99. 809 0 .191 0.191E-02 0.064 7 0; 011 99.821 0.179 0.179E-02 0.067 10 0.016 99.837 0.163 0.163E-02 0. 071 12 0.020 99.856 0.144 0 .144E-02 0.074 7 0. 011 99.868 0.132 0 .132E-02 0.077 7 0. 011 99.879 0.121 0 .121E-02 0.080 5 0.008 99.887 0 .113 0 .113E-02 0.084 7 0. 011 99.899 0.101 O.lOlE-02 0.087 10 0.016 99.915 0.085 0.848E-03 0.090 6 0.010 99. 925 0.075 0.750E-03 Year 8 Year 8 0.093 0.097 0.100 0.103 0.107 0 .110 0 .113 0 .116 7 8 5 7 6 3 3 5 0.011 0 .013. 0.008 0. 011 0.010 0.005 0.005 0.008 99.936 99.949 99.958 99.969 99.979 99.984 99.989 99.997 Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:sthprl.tsf Outflow Time Series File:rdout 0.064 0.051 0.042 0.031 0. 021 0.016 0. 011 0.003 0.636E-03 0.506E-03 0.424E-03 0.310E-03 ·o. 212E-03 0.163E-03 0. 114E-03 0.326E-04 Inflow/Outflow Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: Peak Outflow Discharge: Peak Reservoir Stage: 0.520 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 0.136· CFS at 11:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 4. 77 Ft Peak Reservoir Elev: 104.77 Ft Peak Reservoir Storage: 12031. Cu-Ft 0.276 Ac-Ft Flow Duration from Time Series File:rdout.tsf Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Exceedence Probability CFS % % % -. 0.002 42795 69.790 69.790 30.210 0.302E+OO 0.005 0.008 0.012 0.015 0.018 0.021 0.025 0.028 0.031 0.034 0.038 0. 041 0. 044. 0.048 0.051 0.054 0.057 0.061 0.064 0.067 0. 071 0.074 0.077 0.080 0.084 0.087 0.090 0. 093 0.097 0.100 3853 3153 2410 2876 1860 1179 1150 688 549 352 246 51 7 11 4 6 7 6 7 10 12 7 7 5 7 10 6 7 8 5 6.283 5.142 3. 93 0 4.690 3.033 1.923 1.875 1.122 0.895 0.574 0.401 0.083 0. 011 0.018 0.007 0.010 0.011 0.010 0.011 0.016 0.020 0. 011 0 .011 0.008 0. 011 0.016 0.010 0. 011 0. 013 0.008 76.073 81. 215 85.145 89.835 92.869 94.791 96.667 97.789 98.684 99.258 99.659 99.742 99.754 99. 772 99.778 99.788 99.799 99.809 99.821 99.837 99.856 99.868 99.879 99.887 99.899 99. 915 99.925 99.936 99. 949 99.958 23.927 18.785 14.855 10.165 7 .131 5.209 3.333 2 .211 1. 316 0.742 0. 341 0.258 0.246 0.228 0.222 0.212 0.201 0 .191 0.179 0.163 0.144 0.132 0 .121 0.113 0.101 0.085 0.075 0.064 0.051 0.042 0.239E+OO 0.188E+OO 0.149E+OO 0.102E+OO 0. 713E-01 0. 521E-Ol 0.333E-01 0.221E-01 0 .132E-01 0.742E-02 0.341E-02 0.258E-02 0.246E-02 0.228E-02 0.222E-02 0.212E-02 0. 201E-02 0.191E-02 0.179E-02 0.163E~02 0.144E-02 0.132E-02 0.121E-02 0 .113E-02 O.lOlE-02 0.848E-03 0.750E-03 0.636E-03 -0. 506E-03 0. 424E-03 0.103 7 0. 011 99.969 0.031 0.310E-03 0.107 6 0.010 99.979 0.021 0.212E-03 0.110 3 0.005 99.984 0.016 0.163E-03 0.113 3 0.005 99:989 0 .011 0 .114E-03 0;116 5 0.008 99.997 0.003 0.326E-04 ---------------------------------- Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:sthprl.tsf Outflow Time Series File:rdout Inflow/Outflow Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: 0.520 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Peak Outflow Discharge: 0 .136 CFS at 11 :00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Peak Reservoir Stage: 4. 77 Ft Peak Reservoir Elev: 104.77 Ft Peak Reservoir Storage: 12031. Cu°Ft 0.276 Ac-Ft Flow Duration from Time Series File:rdout.tsf Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Exceedence_Probability CFS % % % 0.002 42795 69.790 69.790 30.210 0.302E+OO 0.005 3853 6.283 76.073 23.927 0.239E+OO 0.008 3153 5.142 81. 215 18.785 0.188E+OO 0.012 2410 3. 930 85.145 14.855 0.149E+OO 0.015 2876 4.690 89.835 10.165 0.102E+OO 0.018 1860 3.033 92.869 7 .131 0. 713E-01 0.021 1179 1. 923 94.791 5.209 0.521E-01 0.025 1150 1.875 96.667 3.333 0.333E-01 0.028 688 1.122 97.789 2 .211 0.221E-01 0.031 549 0.895 98.684 1.316 0.132E-01 0.034 352 0.574 99.258 0.742 0.742E-02 0.038 246 0.401 99.659 0. 341 0.341E-02 0. 041 51 0.083 99.742 0.258 0.258E-02 0.044 7 0. 011 99.754 0.246 0.246E-02 0.048 11 0.018 99. 772 0.228 0.228E-02 0.051 4 0.007 99.778 0.222 0.222E-02 0.054 6 0.010 99.788 0. 212 0.212E-02 0.057 7 0.011 99.799 0.201 0.201E-02 0.061 6 0.010 99.809 0.191 0.191E-02 0.064 7 0. 011 99.821 0.179 0.179E-02 0.067 10 0.016 99.837 0.163 0.163E-02 0. 071 12 0.020 99.856 0.144 0. 144E-02 0.074 7 0. 011 99.868 0 .132 0. 132E-02 0.077 7 0 .011 99.879 0.121 0.121E-02 0.080 5 0.008 99.887 0 .113 0 .113E-02 0.084 7 0. 011 99.899 0.101 O.lOlE-02 0.087 10 0.016 99.915 0.085 0.848E-03 0.090 6 0.010 99.925 0.075 0.750E-03 0. 093 7 0.011 99.936 0.064 0.636E-03 0.097 8 0.013 99.949 0.051 0.506E-03 0.100 5 0.008 99.958 0.042 0.424E-03 0.103 7 0.011 99.969 0.031 0.310E-03 0.107 6 0.010 99.979 0.021 0.212E-03 0 .110 3 0.005 99.984 0.016 0.163E-03 0 .113 3 0.005 99.989 0 .011 0 .114E-03 0.116 5 0.008 99.997 0.003 0.326E-04 Duration Comparison Anaylsis Base File: sthexl.tsf New File: rdout. tsf . Cutoff Units: Discharge in CFS -----Fraction of Time--------------Check of Cutoff Base New %Change Probability 0.044 0.47E-02 0.25E-02 -47.4 I 0.47E-02 0.050 0.33E-02 0.22E-02 -32.5 I 0.33E-02 0.057 0.24E-02 0.20E-02 -16.8 I 0.24E-02 0.064 0.18E-02 0.18E-02 0.9 I 0.18E-02 0.070 0.14E-02 0.15E-02 5.9 I 0.14E-02 0.077 0.lOE-02 0.12E-02 17.2 I O.lOE-02 0.083 0.86E-03 O.lOE-02 18.9 I 0.86E-03 0.090 0.62E-03 0.78E-03 26.3 I 0.62E-03 0.097 0.42E-03 0.52E-03 23.1 I 0.42E-0.3 0.103 0.33E-03 0.31E-03 -5.0 I 0.33E-03 0 .110 0.18E-03 0.16E-03 -9.1 I 0.18E-03 0 .116 0.82E-04 0. 33E-04 -60.0 I 0.82E-04 0 .123 0,49E-04 O.OOE+OO -100.0 I 0.49E-04 Maximum positive excursion= 0.006 cfs ( 8.1%) occurring at 0.077 cfs on the Base Data:sthexl.tsf and at 0.083 cfs on the New Data:rdout.tsf Maximum negative excursion= 0.016 cfs (-28.8%) occurring at 0.054 cfs on the Base Data:sthexl.tsf and at 0.038 cfs on the New Data:rdout.tsf Base 0.044 0.050 0.057 0.064 0.070 0.077 0.083 0.090 0.097 0.103 0 .110 0.116 0.123 Tolerance------- New %Change 0.037 -15.9 0.038 -25.0 0.045 -20.2 0.064 0.5 0.073 3.5 0.083 7.8 0.087 .4. 0 0.094 4.2 0.100 3.8 0.103 -0.4 0.109 -0.8 0 .114 -1. 6 0 .116 -5.7 Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:sthprl.tsf Project Location:sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.257 6 2/09/01 2 00 0.210 8 1/05/02 16 00 0.309 3 2/27/03 7 00 0.227 7 8/26/04 2 00 0.273 4 10/28/04 16 00 0.273 5 1/18/06 16 00 0.330 2 10/26/06 0 00 0.520 l 1/09/08 6 00 computed Peaks SthPrl -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- --Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.520 l 100.00 0.990 0.330 2 25.00 0.960 0.309 3 10.00 0.900 0.273 4 5.00 0.800 0.273 5 3.00 0.667 0.257 6 2.00 o:500 0.227 7 l. 30 0.231 0.210 8 1.10 0.091 0.457 50.00 0.980 Pagel Flow Frequency Analysis Time series· File:sthexl.tsf Project Location:sea-Tac ---Annual Flow Rate (CFS). 0.120 0.080 0.129 0.072 0.085 0.124 0.115 0.218 Peak Flow Rates--- Rank Time of Peak 4 .7 2 8 6 3 5 1 2/09/01 15 00 1/05/02 16 00 2/27/03 7 00 8/26/04 2 00 10/28/04 16 00 1/18/06 16 00 11/24/06 3 00 1/09/08 6 00 Computed Peaks SthExl -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- --Peaks --Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.218 1 100.00. 0.129 2 25.00 0.124 3 10.00 0.120 4 5.00 0.115 5 3.00 0.085 6 2.00 0.080 7 1.30 0.072 8 1.10 0.188 50.00 Page 1 0.990 0.960 0.900 0.800 0.667 0.500 0.231 0.091 0.980 Computing computing · wi1sn2 KCRTS Command Enter the AnalYsis TOOLS Module Analysis Tools Command. Plot Probability EXCEEDENCE Curves Analysis Tools command compute Flow DURATION and Exceedence .CANCELLED Analysis Tools command RETURN to Previous Menu KCRTS Command size a Retention/Detention FACILITY Edit Facility starting Loading Time series File:sthprl.tsf Time series Found in Memory:sthprl.tsf saving Retention/Detention Facilit¥ File:pond.rdf Documentation File:c:\K<:_SWDM\Nahnw,lson2\pond.doc Time series Found in Memory:sthprl.tsf Edit Complete Retention/Detention.FaCiliiy Design Edit Facility CANCELLED Retention/Detentio~ Faci·lity Design Edit Facility CANCELLED Retention/Detention Facility Design Saving Retention/Detention Facility File:pond.rdf Starting Documentation File:C:\Kc_swoM\Nahnwilson2\pond.doc Time series Found in Memory:sthprl.tsf Retention/Detention Faci'lity Design Route Time series through Facility Time Seri es Found in Memory: sthprl.·tsf Reservoir Routing [R/D.Facility] Inflow/outflow Analysis storing Time series File:rdout.tsf Facility Routing complete Duration calculation .. R/D Facility Interval Locations Flow Durations Durations & Exceedence Probabilities to File:rdout.dur Duration Plotting . Loading Flow Duration File:rdout.dur Loading Flow Duration File:target.dur End Graphics command Downstream Analysis complete Retention/Detention Facility Design Tools Nodule Analysis Tools command RETURN to Previous Menu Retention/Detention Facility oesign End Sizing Retention/Detention Facility KCRTS Command Page l Computing computing computing Computing wilsn2 Size a Retention/Detention· FAO:LITY Loading. Ret_enti on/Detention Facility File: pond. rdf Retention/Detention Facility Design Edit Faci 1i ty CANCELLED Retention/Detention Facility·oesign Edit Facility saving Retention/Detention Facility File:pond.rdf Starting Documentation File:c:\KC....SWDM\Nahnwilson2\pond.doc Time series Found in Memory:sthprl.tsf Edit Complete Retention/Detention Facility Design Route Time series through Facility Time series Found in Memory:sthprl.tsf Reservoir Routing [R/D Facility] Inflow/Outflow Analysis storing Time Series File:rdout.tsf Facility Routing Complete Duration calculation •• R/D Facility Interval Locations Flow Durations Durations & Exceedence Probabilities to File:rdout.dur Duration Plotting Loading Flow Duration File:rdout.dur . Loading Flow Duration File:target.dur End Graphics Command Downstream Analysis Complete Retention/Detention Facility Design Edi t Facility saving Retention/Detention Facilit¥ File:pond.rdf Starting Documentation File:c:\Kc._sWDM\Nahnw,lson2\pond.doc Time series Found in Memory:sthprl.tsf Edit complete Retention/Detention Facility Design Route Time series through Facility Time Series Found in Memory:sthprl.tsf Reservoir Rou_ti ng [R/D Facility] Inflow/Outflow Analysis Storing Time series Fi"le:rdout.tsf Facility Routing Complete Duration calculation •. R/D Facility Interval Locations Flow Durations Durations & Exceedence Probabilities to File:rdout.dur Duration Plotting Loading Flow Duration File:rdout.dur Loading Flow Duration File:target.dur End Graphics command Downs.tream Analysis Complete Retention/Detention Facility Design Edit Facility saving Retention/Detention Facilit¥ File:pond.rdf Starting Documentation File:c:\Kc._swoM\Nahnw,lson2\pond.doc Time Series Found in Memory:sthprl.tsf Edit Complete Retention/Detention Facility Design Route Time series through Facility Time Series Found in Memory:sthprl.tsf Reservoir Routing [R/D Facility] Inflow/Outflow Analysis Storing Time Series File:rdout.tsf Facility Routing complete Page 2 computing Computing Duration Interval Locations Flow Durations Durations wil sn2 Calculation .. R/D Facility & Exceedence Probabilities to File:rdout.dur Duration Plotting Loading Flow Duration File:rdout.dur Loading Flow Duration File:target.dur End Graphics Command Downstream Analysis Complete Retention/Detention Facility Design Edit Facility· saving Retention/Detention Facilit¥ File:pond.rdf Starting Documentation File:c:\Kc._SWDM\Nahnw,lson2\pond.doc Time series Found in MemorY:sthprl.tsf Edit complete Retention/Detention Facility Design Route Time Series through Facility Time Series Found in Memory:sthprl.tsf Reservoir Routing [R/D Facility] Inflow/Outflow Analysis Storing Time series File:rdout.tsf Facility Routing complete Du.ration calculation •. R/D Facility Computing Interval Locations computing Flow Durations· Computing computing computing computing Durations & Exceedence Probabilities to File:rdout.dur Duration Plotting Loading Flow Duration File:rdout.dur Loading Flow Duration File:target.dur End Graphics command Downstream Analysis Complete Retention/Detention Facility Design Edit Facility saving Retention/Detention Facility File:pond.rdf starting Documentation File:C:\K<:._SWDM\Nahnwilson2\pond.doc Time Series Found in Memory:sthprl.tsf Edit Complete Retention/Detention Facility Design Route Time series through Facility Time ·series Found in Memory:sthprl.tsf Reservoir Routing [R/D Facility] Inflow/outflow Analysis Storing Time series File:rdout.tsf Facility Routing Complete Duration calculation .. R/D Facility Interval Locations Flow Durations Durations. & Exceedence Probabi 1 iti es to Fi le: rdout', dur Duration Plotting Loading Flow Duration File:rdout.dur Loading Flow Duration File:target.dur End Graphics command Downstream Analysis Complete Retention/Detention Facility Design Route Time series through Facility Time Series Found in Memory:sthprl,tsf Reservoir Routing [R/D Facility] Inflow/Outflow Analysis storing Time Series File:rdout.tsf Facility Routing complete Duration calculation •. R/D Facility Interval Locations Flow Durations Durations & Exceedence Probabilities to File:rdout.dur Duration Plotting Loading Flow Duration File:rdout.dur Loading Flow Duration File:target.dur End Graphics command Downstream Analysis Complete Page 3 wilsn2 Retention/Detention Facility Design Route Time series through Facility Time Series Found in Memory:sthprl.tsf Reservoir Routing [R/D Facility] Inflow/Outflow Analysis Storing Time series File:rdout.tsf Facility Routing Complete Duration calculation .. R/D Facility computing Interval Locations Computing Flow Durations Durations & Exceedence Probabilities to File:rdout.dur Duration Plotting Loading Flow Duration File:rdout.dur Loading Flow Duration File:target.dur End Graphics Command Downstream Analysis complete Retention/Detention ·Facility Design Tools Module Ana 1 _ys i s Too 1 s command COMPARE Flow Durations Loading Stage/Discharge curve:sthprl.tsf CANCELLED. Analysis Tools command COMPARE Flow Durations CANCELLED Analysis Tools Command COMPARE Flow Durations Loading Time series File:sthexl.tsf Loading Stage/Discharge curve:sthexl.tsf Duration comparison Anaylsis Base File: sthexl.tsf New Fi 1 e: rdout. tsf. Maximum positive excursion c 0.006 cfs ( 8.1%) occurring at 0.077 cfs on the ease oata:sthexl.tsf and at 0.083 cfs on the New Data:rdout.tsf Maximum negative excursion= 0.016 cfs (-28.8%) occurring at 0.054 cfs on'the Base oata:sthexl.tsf and at 0.038 cfs on the New oata:rdout.tsf Duration comparison Computed and Analysis Tools command RETURN to Previous Menu Saved output File:compare.prn Retention/Detention Facility Design End Sizing ~etention/oetention Facility KCRTS Command exit KCRTS Program Page 4 ti KingCounty Department of IJ:::t::t 04-C:9-C:8 ,-.:-, .•··. ~C.r. Development and Environmental Services OAK-DE-0100 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057 ~-L .a.::: ,. ' c.; C s.~·1-r-1sr-1i 3 820400080/L08S002 I GOODLOELL W 9321 S 225TH PL KENT WA 98031 9ai!l~"1H' !Is 2 i 9 i:JA 98G c"' I!!~ a:-' o<> "'1-w"' "'"' 0.. ii: I:+:J: II ~~¢Pas,.~ &~~ n ,-;;;. ,,. -_---...... ==-z 4 -.E:-7~ --=c:,, ::::t '= PflNI Y tt<:>VVI ', 02 1M $ 00.36° 0004253200 APR 08 2008 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 98055 .::t:<::tJZ sso Cl;: 4 o,i. f';;,!,/ ;i>/06 ~!e'TUl'rn ,t:i SENOl!:R NOT CEL7VERAE!LE AS .CICDRESSEC UNABLE TO FORWARD EiC : 980.5 7.5'2:1999 •2se9-ose7s-1s-2? I I ,I II I, ,l,JI,,,, J ,JI J Ill I, I, I,,, I, I,,, 111, I,, J, I,, l, I,,, I l,, I 11) ~ ... J /.f.l ITT -. 'p :-· =-· =-· I i ~I I "';;:,: I ' I !l.:::" : g '° ~ ! I ~ i3 i:s j I > ~~ I I ~~ r . ' C rt I i I ~~i I . ~ . r•· I . ' -~-~ >-v, ['rl ! :) J: .. :.· 1 ,::> -8 r rn If you wish to receive a copy of the DDES report and decision of this application, complete and return this portion of the notice to the Land Use Services Division at the address listed above. 4tA . ,,;,v ~ File No. : L08S0021 -Wilson/Tran Short Plat v ~~~e print) J..j O Y Q M 13 u.. C km e ,• e /<.. f-ii._[: ' l,o,.::-,, A~dress: ){pf;,'/7 J.;J}§"T Ave: S,£, ge/'1'[otJ, LUA 9K'~{;~ Telephone No.: '-I :;JS· .:2$5 -~/~S- King County has received an application to develop property at the address listed above. You are receiving this notice because our records indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet of the proposal. Type2 NOA . ~:. ·;. c::--.. · !~:&!] ·-- I I ~ i Q. lie 0 I Ill i f-g z <I, 0 • z • ! 0 m 0 " ; i PAEOll-1 Notice ® · of Application King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 Applicants: (Type 2) Edward Wilson 17844 1201h Avenue SE bate ApplicationFiled:'.,FE!~r\Jar:y 29,.~0QBfi. ,,,' · Renton, WA 98058 Date Determineq C:ompletf februa!'}' 4.~•!8~,H~: ·. 425-235~6008. . . .·• . ·. · ,.'.. ::Yt:r Project Locatiqn: Th.~. site is located;at the,;riorthw~~J'~Qrneri~f,.~t;:1801 ~ Street ~ndi1~9_l:i( ... , Avenue SE•inte~~~Ctio~. apcl e~~~nd~it1Areth~e~!tix;tofI'~!i!'¥'3':'U' •is.E. The postaJ[~.,~iis.,,· Renton. The· parcel numbers ar.e 61~(;,(;0t.05~0'.~n~6196!i0f0540 .. ·.:· · ··.·· :;c:•:'f: · ··. ' . ' ' .. :,. ' ' :._ ,·=: ' ;"', :. ·_ . :: ' ' , . .l:!} .. Rroject Desqription: . ~ 1 1:]ort1!!1:!IJ~iy,i~ion of approxim~tely 2.57'acre.s into8 lots .for t.tteJ::,1 :/ development of!aetacliedi:sihgl~~fiimily residences in the R-s zone. · '. : , (:" Permits requested in this application: Short Subdivision i·(,:' '' Relevant environmental documents are available at the above aclcfre'ss: Draina~e gtudyj';! Environmental C~ecklist, Critical Are~s Study,Geot~cllbf~ai_iHv·estigation· .. ,'t/ -~ . ·,;··· . Develop~E:nt.regulatii;>,rs to ~e used for proj7ct mitigation, knowil'.at,t~i§ ti_rn,e;,1KCC ~1A~)."!ilY"?lng Cr1t1cal Are.a 'RElgulat,pns, ·R<>,ad $Ji;i.11~ar~s;1a;r1~1;29q5 $1,1rfac::e WJ!ter Des.11:1n ,r,,an,ual . • '·,, •• '' • ,,• a '' '-••• , • : ;;·r.i: .• :. . 7 ,_il, ,,' . _ Consistency with .aRpl}9c11:Jle·;Cou~ty pla~s anfii r~gulati,ons\ ... oT~J~J.pr~eP~~!,"".iJl:IJ,~:r,~~~~ti;i,~,,\f.<>,~ ''ii' compl1~ ryce with. a I! .appl 1cabl~·Kmg ·q~:IJc"!~j~0,#1«!!}r.~!~~t~!J'.R<>a~~,S~r,i,~,~~~:;. }', Surface Water Design Manual'and Cnt,caliJ:'~rea~!c<::;oq,es. · . .· ; ';:,..,~,; . ,,~ -.. · . ' ,;,-• . ,.-' . ,' Other permits not in duded in this application,;known aJ,this timJ{t)l_oie,.af this time. {t·: · ~ . . ... -, . , ?.t . : :~.~~'.,: \1 The Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day public comment period which ends on May 2. 2008. Written comments on this application must be submitted to DOES at the address below. A public hearing is not required for this application prior to the DOES decision. However, the ODES decision may be appealed to the King County Hearing Examiner, who would conduct an appeal hearing prior to making a decision on the appeal. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice of decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact the Project Manager at the phone number listed above. You may review the application and any environmental documents or studies in our Renton office. NOTE: If you require this.material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 206-296-6600 (voice) or 206-296-7217 (TTY). Department of Development and E.nvironmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 Date of Malling: April 8, 2008 ----------------------=--==--===================== If you wish to receive a copy of the DOES report and decision of this application, complete and return this portion of the notice to the Land Use Services Division at the address listed above. File No. : L08S0021 -Wilsonrrran Short Plat (Please print) Name: ______________________________ _ Address:------------~------------------- Telephone No.: King County has received an application to develop property .at the address listed above. You are receiving this notice because our records Indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet of the proposal. Type2 NOA I ··------~ . ' --.--, ~ I I ' _____ J i ·------i ' ,----, I I , · I ~ ~ L_•_J .... :. \···\ -. +,t~ ' ' '. ;,;'---.--0 r--1 J ·-; -:--• ·11 00 =::f ~j -< ·: ... I~ r· 1 .. . .. '" i ' : ',-\,(/.4. r-, , , , 1•· , O_ Ll~J'/ .,. . . . 0 --~ i1' w ;,:; 0 ,,, co 0 "" 0 <.O m "" = (f) = = WILSON/TRAN 8-LOT SHORT Pl.AT r:....---, I • I I I I I I L ____ .J 4-..,,,_ ... ____ ...__ "::'tmr'.I:!..::" !It 1! l I I I r ~ I g ~ ! ! Ii 1 't,G King County Department of ·:.··.:.· ·.:.· ·.:.· .-.. ~ .-. ..... .-.. - Development and Environmetrfaf'Si!!rvices:_:=-i--:_:'::!-:_:!::! SEA i:JA 980 I:+::t 4-t-¢' Pes,,-1q. OAK-DE-0100 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057 c"' I!! <IJ .,5 o" 0>- 11! 1:1 CL ii: II §~i"""=i:l. n z ~ '1?-7.c::::==::::7 .c:=::=::, :) ~ PITlll[V flOVW.5 0 2 1M $ IO({J).JSO 0004253200 APR 08 2008 MAil.ED FROM ZIP CODE 98055 6 J 972004021Lossoo21 CAMPBELL scon A+L YNDJ,E R J 8043 I 20TIJ A VE SE RENTON IV A 98058 -,_, &.'.f'.'TNSl'·fga 0 __ °3@~9':219 , I~ '-' I N:p<1E siap ~c )l. oi ~~1;7100 RETURN TO SENDER NOi OEL..:I'.J'E:RAEIL.E AS ADDRESSED UNA6LE TO FORWARD eic: 9eo.s7.s2:1. eis-il' *2S89-01-S71-~~-20 ii IL Ii 1) iii L 111 i Ii Ii I I l i IL i l JJ ii L 11 ii LL) L j JI L j I l J ii 11 i If you wish to receive a copy of the ODES report and dec1s1on onrns app11cauu11, 1.,v111p1""" """ ,.,,u,,, ,,.,~ portion of the notice to the Land Use Services Division at the address listed above. File No. : L08S0021 -Wilson/Tran Short Plat ~-.:zS-08 (Please print ) G /, -{~ Name: 0 re o/\1 f:: Lo r ellf C. e "''Iv Address: / 7 5 5;;, II E3 -i:::!I-At/1::7 S, L~-_ Re.AJ to .u WA-~~ ,. Telephone No.: 7::25 ;J,;2, Lp-17 So . 9 80 S 6 00,o King County has received an application to develop property at the address listed above. You are receiving this 'J-- 4 notice because our records indicate that you owr. property within approxlmately 500 feet of the proposal. Type2NOA l;,.cc';. j -_c ,, . ~ ('( -..;;, -··-"1, ·- V) ·-·- I ·- 3 ~ ·-II) rl .J VJ £) ~ .. '~ C>o ·-:: z 4; ~ ll.: ·-::: J ~ UJ ~ .J .. ~ 1. ~ ct Cl 1/l . •r ·' ~ ~ I G ~ 1'.1 ~ ct('I 1.(1 ~ /.,:, Cl'-,. I'-· IA,l 1 •• J m ()'l ~ . l.'l:i l-1) 'Ir] V) ~ \I ~ \l ! • ~ J -1 ~ \, ~ ~ 1 ~ -~ ~ . \" \. Q ~ i ... ~ '::: ~ til King County . King ~ounty · · Department of Development and Environmental .Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 Febmary 29, 2008 Brenda Tran 12055 SE l 78 1h Street Renton, WA 98058 Ed Wilson 17834 120 1 " Avenue SE Renton, WA 98058 RE: Notice of Complete Application for Application Time Periods Application No. L08S0021 -Wilson/Tran Short Plat Date Filed: February 29, 2008 Dear Ms. Tran & Mr. Wilson: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that on February 29, 2008, the Land Use Services Division detcnnined that the above-referenced application is complete under current requirements for a complete application. This initial dctem1inatio11 is intended only for the purpose of applying the time periods for pem1it processing specified in King County Code 19A and 20. Supplemental infonnation may be requested by the Division, as necessary, for the continued review of your application. Our goal is to process your application within 120 days. However, the complexity and level of analysis required to review your project and available staff resources will affect the actual review time. The timeline can also be impacted by one or more of the following: • any request made by the Division for additional infom1ation • changes or revisions requested by the applicant • mutually-agreed-upon requests to stop the time clock • preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement • failure to post the property • resolution of land use decisions appeals If you have any questions about your application or the posting requirements, please contact me at (206) 296-6758. Sincerely, ~t)iA)J__/ ah Bull, PPM ill nt Planning Section cc: PK Enterprises, Phillip Kitzes 23035 SE 263rd Street Maple Valley, WA 98038 Curt Foster, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Application file • , ® King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 L08S0021 Wilson/Tran Short Plat ODES Project Number l,_F-'-14_1_1...1.-_~1 P~_K----'1--'i'-Le=.a~S. ____ ,, hereby affirm that I have posted the following: (print name) X Notice of Permit Application ·· ~.!N FILE COPY D Other--------------- on the I S Tl~ day of Ar'~\ L-, 2008, in accordance with the Department of Development and Environmental Services' requirements. I further affirm that the notice will remain in place and visible during the full required notice period. Notice was provided at the following location(s): 2) orv .... = = = 3) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ;l't :,a ~ (:) :::0 I hereby affirm that the above is a true and correct statement. Vil . ' Q) I,!) ~~ 2 ,., > " :IC V> --.. N ca This affidavit must be completed and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days of posting. Improper posting or failure to return the affidavit within 7 days shall be cause for the final decision regarding your permit to be postponed. ~ r,, (') n, -< ,.,, (!ID O· ~ 1- ,. ® King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 •· I·, Notice Board & Postin·g Procedures lns~ruction Package Notice of Application Posting package mailed 3/25/08 to Edward Wilson L08S0021 and Brenda Tran@ 178441201h Ave SE, Renton WA 98058 In accordance with King County Code Section 20.20.060, enclosed you wi~~~ i[ih-tctio'ns,, specifications, and materials in order to meet the notice of application posting requirements of the County. Please read these instructions carefully and take action quickly to order your notice board sign. The sign must be up and notices posted 14 days from the date of the complete application letter. Your notice board sign can be ordered through a sign painter, using the information supplied on page 2 of the enclosed "Notice Board Requirements." The cost of the sign is the responsibility of the applicant. Further processing of your application is dependent upon fulfilling the notice of application posting requirement. When your sign is in place, attach the colored laminated notice of application along with the plastic envelope (containing extra copies of the notice of application) to the notice board as depicted on page 1 of the instructions. Maintain a supply of notices within the plastic envelope throughout the comment period. The posting sign/notice board must remain in place throughout the duration of your application. The sign must not obstruct the view of pedestrians or vehicular traffic. Immediately upon completion of the above instructions, complete the enclosed affidavit of posting and return to the Department of Development and Environmental Services. Land Use Division, Current Planning Section. at the address shown above (envelope enclosed). Failure to comply with posting reguirements may be cause for a delay in the processing of your application. If you have any questions, please call the Land Use Services Division at (206) 296-6600. Enclosures: Notice Board Requirements-Application Laminated Notice of Application Waterproof Vinyl Envelope containing copies of the Notice of Application Affidavit of Notice of Application Posting form/LUSD return envelope ® King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 L08S0021 Wilson/Tran Short Plat DOES Project Number ,) ': i· ·::ii.«.;· '! ,:I, .. I, ____ .,....,--,--------·· hereby affirm that I have posted the following: (print name) X Notice of Permit Application D Other ________ __;._ ____ _ on the day of , 2008, in accordance with the Department of Development and Environmental Services' requirements. I further affirm that the notice will remain in place and visible during the full required notice period. Notice was provided at the following location(s): 1) ------------------------ 2). ______________________ _ 3) I hereby affirm that the above is a true and correct statement. Signature This affidavit must be completed and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days of posting. Improper posting or failure to return the affidavit within 7 days shall be cause for the final decision regarding your permit to be postponed. ;'1 .1,'.:;,,1: ( .. ,:•;\,_,: t ·::'', .. '1\\1.i'~.r::.': ! ; ~'.i?l~~v;'' . I : : t '' ':·:-t--.:'IJl': ·~.i'~':~;i,1 t 1:riiTt<\-:, ,/ >::~iif~t'.~l{'} :·:)r_; !}\i;:11 :·~taf!:d.~rd~:){or:!;:P_~ating a.~~ lrJstal,U.~g NQ~!:~f~?~~~{/:1 The notice board shall be located and installed to the specifications described below. Number of Notice Boards required for this application: TWO (2) Notice boards shall be located 11 on SE 180th Stand 11 on 118th Ave SE, and; • • Midpoint on the site street frontage or as otherwise directed by LUSD staff to maximize visibility . At a location 5 feet inside from the street property line; a notice board structurally attached to an existing building shall be exempt from the setback provisions, provided that no notice board is located not more than 5 feet from the property line without approval from LUSD staff. • So that. the top of the notice board is between 7 to 9 feet above grade . • So that it is easily accessible and totally visible to pedestrians and does not obstruct the view of pedestrians or vehicular traffic. The applicant shall erect the notice board by solidly setting the post 12 to 18 inches into the ground; or structurally attached it to an existing building. Two 4" x 4" 8-foot-long (minimum) posts and four washers, bolts and nuts (3/8-inch diameter and bolts are 5-inches long) shall be used to install the notice board. . Installation Certification The notice board(s) must be installed within 14 days after Land Use Services Division has determined that the application is compl~te. The enclosed "Affidavit of Posting" must be signed, and returned to the Land Use Services Division ... · within 7 days following the date of posting. Maintenance and Removal of the Notice Board The applicant shall maintain the notice board in good condition throughout the application review period, which shall extend through the time of the final county decision on the proposal and the expiration of any applicable appeal periods. If the notice board is removed, LUSD review of the land use application may be discontinued until the notice board is replaced and has remained in place for the required period of time. TO BE FILLED OUT BY LUSD STAFF =====================================================================------= NOTICE BOARD TEXT INFORMATION (To Be Given to the Sign Painter) Type of Action: Short Subdivision Proposal: Subdivide 2.57 acres into 8 lots File No.: LOBS0021 NOTE: If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 206-296-6600 (voice) or for hearing impaired 206-296-7217. Notice Board Requirements-NOA 8/8/01 Pg 2 NOTICE BOARD REQUIREMENTS-, NOTICE OF APPLICATION· King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Servicts Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 980S7-S2l 2 Per King County Code Section 20.20.060, a notice board must be prepared and posted for your land use application. Please prepare and post in the following manner: Notice Board Size and Text Specifications The notice board shall be constructed to the specifications described below. The notice board shall display the information shown in the figure. Board Construction: The notice board shall be constructed with 4' x 4' plywood. Professionally prepared plastic notice board overlays, permanently affixed to the board are permissible. Notice boards may be reused but they must be clean and show no evidence of former wording. 1. Lettering style: Helvetica or similar standard typeface 2. Lettering size: Title should be 3" capital letters (NOTICE OF PROPOSED LAND USE ACTION). Other letters should be 2" letters except on the 8%" x 14" laminated paper providing the details of the proposal. See illustration below for use of capital and lower case letters, and placement of laminated paper and vinyl jacket. 3. Lettering: Black (permanent ink or silk-screen) 4. Background Color: White 5. Logo: King County emblem, in black 6. Laminated Notice of Application on a legal size sheet which provides information regarding the proposed land use application. TO BE SUPPLIED BY Land Use Services Division (LUSD) (see enclosed). · 7. Legal size waterproof vinyl jackets with a fold flap, and wrap string. TO BE SUPPLIED BY LUSD (see enclosed). The applicant must make copies of the Notice, place them in the vinyl jacket, and maintain a supply of copies throughout the posting period. 4 FT ® NOTICE OF PROPOSED LAND USE ACTION King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 Call (206) 296-6600 Type of Action: Proposal: File No.: NOTICE OF APPLICATION 8.5n X 1411 LAMINATED 4 FT EXAMPLE COPIES OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION IN VINYL JACKET Notice Board Requirements-NOA 8/8/01 Pg 1 Moe, Judi From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Bull, Trishah Friday, March 21, 2008 3:16 PM Moe, Judi LOBS0021 -Wilson/Tran LOBS0021 NOA.doc; LOBS0021 post.doc L0850021NOA.doc L0850021post.doc (58 KB) (33 KB) UA-U !7flf({,-Jo-()~(1)µ ~G /fp-Yl ron. u.JA- ~os;y-- L08S0021 -Wilsonrrran Short Plat Number of sign boards required: 2 Location of sign boards: 1 Board on SE 1801h Street 1 Board on 1181h Avenue SE Formal Plats A. Cities within 1 mile to be notified: Renton B. Airports within 2 miles to be notified: None Mail Notice to: 1) Affected Tribes * 2) Applicant 3) Community Groups* 4) DOT, if adjoins State highway * Always included as a notice recipient (off of the STR list). Planners Posting Board lnstrx.doc Legal Ad Request • Moe, Judi From: Legals [legals@seattletimes.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 11 :03 AM To: Moe, Judi Subject: RE: Legal Ad Request Hi again Judi, Page I of2 MAii~ HLE (;OPY Your legal notice for L08S0021 is scheduled to run on Wednesday 4/2 in the Seattle Times on Ad# 3893530 costing $49.88. Thank you, Kathy Baldwin Legals Account Executive Seattle Times representing The Post Intelligencer Phone:206-652-6018 Fax: 206-515-5595 Email: legals@seattletimes.com From: Moe, Judi [mailto:Judi.Moe@kingcounty.gov] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 3: 15 PM To: Legals; legals@kcjn.com Subject: Legal Ad Request Linda, please publish in the Renton Reporter. Thank you, Judi Please confirm receipt. Please publish legal notice in your newspaper on April 2, 2008, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please fax or call me as soon as possible. · Please submit your invoice with 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to DDES Accounts Payable as soon after publication as possible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DDES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98057-5212 NOl]CE OF LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUEST: Sl:IORT Plat File: L08S0021 Applicant: Edward Wilson and Brenda Tran 03/26/2008 Legal Ad Request Page 2 of2 • .. ~ ' Location: NW corner of SE 1801h St and 120th Ave SE, Postal City Renton Proposal: Subdivide 2.57 acres into 8 residential lots Project Planner: Shannon Dorr, 206-296-6673 COMMENT PROCEDURES: ODES will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day comment period ending on May 2, 2008. Written comments and additional information can be obtained by contacting the planner at the phone number listed above. Published this 2nd day of April, 2008 c.c. Accounts Payable/Admin. Services/ DOES Application File: L08S0021 S.Times Acct.No.: 078871004 03/26/2008 Please confirm receipt. Please publish legal notice in your newspaper on April 2, 2008, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please fax or call me as soon as possible. Please submit your invoice with 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to DDES Accounts Payable as soon after publication as possible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DDES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98057-5212 NOTICE OF LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUEST: SHORT Plat File: L08S0021 Applicant: Edward Wilson and B~enda Tran Location: NW corner of SE 1801 St and 120th Ave SE , Postal City Renton Proposal: Subdivide 2.57 acres into 8 residential lots Project Planner: Shannon Dorr, 206-296-6673 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DOES will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day comment period ending on May 2. 2008. Written comments and additional information can be obtained by contacting the planner at the phone number listed above. Published this 2nd day of April, 2008 c.c. Accounts Payable/Admin. Services/ DDES Application File: L08S0021 S.Times Acct.No.: 078871004 GISMO -Parcel Information Report 1.2.1 ti King County DOES Parcel Information Report -Change ReRort- Thls report was generated: 3/26/2008 B:43:03 AM ! .~ Print Report ! Parcel Number: 6196600540 -Chang_e ReRort_.e_arcels-® 13 Base Info Parcel Number: 6196600540 Tax Payer: WILSON ED Property Name: N/A Annexation: Benson Hill (Recent) Jurisdiction: Renton Situs Address: No Address Assigned Zip Code: 98058 Postal City s Reference Info Page I of2 The information Included In this report has been compiled by staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change wlthou County makes no representations or warranties, express or lmpl accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of suet King County shall not be liable for any general, special, Indirect, consequential damages lncludlng, but not limited to, lost rev, profits resulting from the use or misuse of the Information con report. Any sale of this report or Information on this report except by written permission of King County. Plat Name: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO. 01 Plat Recording Date: N/A Plat Lot: 9 Plat Block: 2 Kroll Page: 605 Thomas Brothers Page: 686 1/4-S-T-R: NW-33-23-5 Lot Area: 36,035 Sq Ft. (0.83 Acres) 1=1 Planning Info Zoning: R-6 Comprehensive Land Use: um Development Condition: N/A Assessor's Open Space: N/A Commercial Use: N/A Number of Units: N/A Appraised Land Value: 2007 -$156,000, 2008 -$171,000, 2006 -$150,000 Appraised Improvements Value: 2007 -$0, 2008 -$0, 2006 -$0 13 Administrative District Info Community Plan Area: Soos Creek Unincorporated Area Council: N/A School District: Renton School District 403 Fire District: King County Fire Protection District No. 40 (40) Roads MPS Zone: 342 (Fee N/A) Roads Transportation Concurrency Mitigation Zone: 798 Waterfront: No Water System: WATER DISTRICT http://ddeshome/gis/reports/parcelinfo.aspx?muid=20080326084149000&pin=6196600540 03/26/2008 GISMO -Parcel Information Report 1.2.1 ... Water Service Planning Area: N/A Sewer System: No Airport Noise Remedy Program: N/A Council District: 5 Julia Patterson Drainage Basin: Soos Creek: WRIA 9 Police Jurisdiction: King County Police Precinct: 3 Police District: F3 Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Forest Production District: N Rural Forest Focus Area: N Transfer Development Rights Type: N/A Transfer Development Rights Status: N/A Transfer Development Rights Permit Number: N/A El Inspection Area Info Building Inspection Area: 5-4 Clearing Inspection Area: Richelle Rose Code Enforcement Inspection Area: Bill Turner ESA Inspection Area: Kathy Newborn Grading Inspection Area: Ramon Locsin Land Use Inspection Area: Mike Meins El Sensitlve/Crltlcal Area Info Sensitive Areas Notice(s) on Title: None Sensitive Historic Site: None Bald Eagle Data: Bald Eagle Flag: N/A Aquatic Areas Buffer: N Basin Condition: Medium Flow Control Area: N/ A Water Quality: N/A Critical Aquifer Recharge Area: None Area of Potential Wetland Influence: N Shoreline Management Master Program Designation: None G!S Mapping Operations (GlSMO) Version 1.2.l Page 2 of2 http://ddeshome/gis/reports/parcelinfo.aspx?muid=20080326084149000&pin=6 J 96600540 03/26/2008 GISMO -Parcel Information Report 1.2.1 ti King County ODES Parcel Information Report ·Change Report- This report was generated: 3/26/2008 8:40:32 AM ! !;) Print Report I Parcel Number: 6196600520 -Change Rep~ Parcels-® El Base Info Parcel Number: 6196600520 Tax Payer: TRAN BRENDA N Property Name: N/A Annexation: Benson Hill (Recent) Jurisdiction: Renton Situs Address: No Address Assigned Zip Code: 98058 Postal Cit}' El Reference Info Page 1 of2 The information Included In this report has been compiled by staff from a variety of sources and Is subject to change wlthou County makes no representations or warranties, express or Jmpl accuracy 1 completeness, tlmellness, or rights to the use of suet King County shall not be liable for any general, speclal, Indirect, consequential damages Including, but not limited to, lost rev, profits resulting from the use or misuse of the Information con report. Any sale of this report or Information on this report except by written permission of King County. Plat Name: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO. 01 Plat Recording Date: N/A Plat Lot: 8 Plat Block: 2 Kroll Page: 605 Thomas Brothers~ge:_686 1/4-S·T-R: NW-33 3-5 Lot Area: 75,794 qFt. (1.74 Acres) El Planning Info Zoning: R-6 Comprehensive Land Use: um Development Condition: N/A Assessor's Open Space: N/A Commercial Use: N/A Number of Units: N/A Appraised Land Value: 2008 -$156,000, 2006 -$137,000, 2007 -$142,000 Appraised Improvements Value: 2008 -$0, 2006 -$0, 2007 -$0 El Administrative District Info Community Plan Area: Soos Creek Unincorporated Area Council: N/A School District: Renton School District 403 Fire District: King County Fire Protection District No. 40 ( 40) Roads MPS Zone: 342 (Fee N/A) Roads Transportation Concurrency Mitigation Zone: 798 Waterfront: No Water System: WATER DISTRICT http://ddeshome/gis/reports/parcelinfo.aspx?muid=20080326083953000&pin=6196600520 03/26/2008 GISMO -Parcel lnformation Report 1.2.1 Water Service Planning Area: N/A Sewer System: No Airport Noise Remedy Program: N/A Council District: 5 Julia Patterson Drainage Basin: Soos Creek: WRIA 9 Police Jurisdiction: King County Police Precinct: 3 Police District: F3 Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Forest Production District: N Rural Forest Focus Area: N Transfer Development Rights Type: N/A Transfer Development Rights Status: N/A Transfer Development Rights Permit Number: N/A El Inspection Area Info Building Inspection Area: 5-4 Clearing Inspection Area: Richelle Rose Code Enforcement Inspection Area: Bill Turner ESA Inspection Area: Kathy Newborn Grading Inspection Area: Ramon Locsin Land Use Inspection Area: Mike Meins El Sensitive/Critical Area Info Sensitive Areas Notice(s) on Title: None Sensitive Historic Site: None Bald Eagle Data: Bald Eagle Flag: N/A Aquatic Areas Buffer: N Basin Condition: Medium Flow Control Area: N/ A Water Quality: N/A Critical Aquifer Recharge Area: None Area of Potential Wetland Influence: N Shoreline Management Master Program Designation: None GIS Mapping Operations (GISMO) Version 1.2.1 Page 2 of2 http://ddeshome/gis/reports/parce1info.aspx?muid=20080326083953000&pin=6196600520 03/26/2008 USPS -ZIP Code Lookup -Find P City By ZIP Code Results • p UN/TEQST13IES POST4L SERVICE. Find a City by ZIP Code™ Results You Gave Us 98058 Do Another LookuQ Page I of I USPS Hom ~ Cities in a ZIP Code may be referred to by more than one name or spelling. These results indicate the l..!.J. actual city name. ("Not Acceptable" city names are listed for your reference only -do not use.) Actual City name in 98058 RENTON, WA. Not Acceptable CASCADE, WA FAIRWOOD, WA Related Links Calculate Postage Calculate postage for your letter or package online! Rate Calculator Print Shipping Labels Print shipping labels from your desktop and pay online. Click-N-Shi~ Other Postage ------·-------- Business or Residence Lookup Yellow Pages Find a business nationwide. White Pages Find a residence nationwide. ,._ •• ••·----·-· ••---•• • --·-•--•••m• ·--·-·•-· .-.-- po+t'Of94 e,y Switchboard Sl1e...Ma9 Contact 11,i &rml ~ Jcmt ' Er:MtcyhllCY Terms of Use Hetlonal & Premier Accounts http://zip4.usps.com/zip4/zcl_3 _results.jsp?zip5=98058 03/26/2008 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 Applicants: BrendaJ"ran . . .. 154371391h Avenue SE Renton, WA 98058. 206"478~5902 . Edward Wilson NoTice of Application (Type 2) File No·: L08S0021i:... Wilson/Tran Sh~rt Plat • • ,, • ' ' • 1 ',-1, DOES ProjEid Manager: Shannon Dorr Telep hem~' No.: '2Q6-?~6-6673 · Email: sharmon,dori'@kingcounty.gov 178441201h Avenue SE Date Application Filed:,February 29, 2008 '' Renton, WA 98058 Date Determined Complete: February 29, 2008 . ·• ' 425-235-6008 MAIN FILE:; ro Project Location: The site is located at the northwest corner of SE 1801 h Street and 1201 h· Py Avenue SE intersection and extends northwesterly to 118th Avenue SE. The postal city is Renton. The parcel numbers are 619660-0520 and 619660-0540. Project Description: Stlort subdivij;iion of approxirri'ately 2.5_7acres into 8 lots for the ''' development of detached singlesfamily residences. in th~. R-6,zone. Permits requested in this application: Short Subdivision Relevant environmental documents are available at the above .ad~resS: Drainage Study, · Environmental Checklist, Critical Areas Study, Geotechnical Investigation ' ' Development regulations to be used.for project mitigation, known at this ti111e: KCC 21A, including Critical Area Regulations; Road Standards, and 2005 Surface Water Design Manual. ''; 1-• . . ' . . • ,· :·. . Consistency with applicable County plans ·and regulations: , This proposal will be reviewe.d for compliance with all applicable King County codes including Roads Standards, · Surface Water Design Manual and Critical Areas,Codes. · Other permits not included in this application, known at this time:· None at this time. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day public comment period which ends on May 2, 2008. Written comments on this application must be submitted to DOES at the address below. A public hearing is not required for this application prior to the DOES decision. However, the DOES decision may be appealed to the King County Hearing Examiner, who would conduct an appeal hearing prior to making a decision on the appeal. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice of decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact the Project Manager at the phone number listed above. You may review the application and any environmental documents or studies in our Renton office. NOTE: If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 206-296-6600 (voice) or 206-296-7217 (TTY). Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 Date of Mailing: April 8 1 2008 ---------------------=----======================== If you wish to receive a copy of the ODES report and decision of this application, complete and return this portion of the notice to the Land Use Services Division at the address listed above. File No. : L08S0021 -Wilsonrrran Short Plat (Please print) Name: ------------------------ Address: ____________________________ _ Telephone No.: --,---:---- King County has received an application to develop property at the address listed above. You are receiving this notice because our records Indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet of the proposal. Type2 NOA . b-) 1 '•··· > ;;<; 0 1"11 co (J C-.> 0 <.O m c-., = (J) = 0:, I I ' I ' I ' ' I ' ------~ --,--, ~ I I ' _____ J i ·------1 0 I Gui] @ GuiJ <= - ,----~--:--~-- : I r---, I , I : I : I I l.---.J I r--1 / I ~ I I : l ) \ L __ _j I I I I --------v..,------· s ! i r.:...---, I • I / fi / L ____ J r. l ~ j ' Ii 'I "I ---~W~I~LS~O~N'_C/T~RA~N~B-~LO~T~S~H~O~RT~PLA~T::___ __ }---"'~~~~"----li • 1 I J'J-..--.--- " I I I ,_.._.A._ I I SU90IV1SION '-!AP ~(~.:!.m' ..., • , Rfl/lON lMINCllltl"OMTtU, QiG COIMTT w _w D ---< N 1nl w _z ;o i 0 1 V, u~ ,m ' ij I l King County Department of Development end Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 Applicants: Brenda Tran 15437 1391h Avenue SE Renton, WA 98058 206-478-5902 Edward Wilson 178441201h Avenue SE Renton, WA 98058 425-235-6008 N<Aice of Application (Type 2) File No: L08S0021 -Wilson/Tran Short Plat DOES Project Manager: Shannon Dorr Telephone No.: 206-296-6673 Email: shannon.dorr@kingcounty.gov Date Application Filed: February 29, 2008 Date Determined Complete: February 29, 2008 Project Location: The site is located at the northwest corner of SE 1801 h Street and 1201 h Avenue SE intersection and extends northwesterly to 118th Avenue SE. The postal city is Renton. The parcel numbers are 619660-0520 and 619660-0540. Project Description: Short subdivision of approximately 2.57 acres into 8 lots for the development of detached single-family residences in the R-6 zone. Permits requested in this application: Short Subdivision Relevant environmental documents are available at the above address: Drainage Study, Environmental Checklist, Critical Areas Study, Geotechnical Investigation Development regulations to be used for project mitigation, known at this time: KCC 21A, including Critical Area Regulations, Road Standards, and 2005 Surface Water Design Manual. Consistency with applicable County plans and regulations: This proposal will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County codes including Roads Standards, Surface Water Design Manual and Critical Areas Codes. Other permits not included in this application, known at this time:' None at this time. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day public comment period which ends on May 2, 2008. Written comments on this application must be submitted to ODES at the address below. A public hearing is not required for this application prior to the ODES decision. However, the DOES decision may be appealed to the King County Hearing Examiner, who would conduct an appeal hearing prior to making a decision on the appeal. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice of decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact the Project Manager at the phone number listed above. You may review the application and any environmental documents or studies in our Renton office. NOTE: If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 206-296-6600 (voice) or 206-296-7217 (TTY). Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 Date of Mailing: April 81 2008 ==============--============-------=====---------- If you wish to receive a copy of the DOES report and decision of this application, complete and return this portion of the notice to the Land Use Services Division at the address listed above. File No. : L08S0021 -Wilsonrrran Short Plat (Please print) Name: ____________________________ _ Address:. ____________________________ _ Telephone No.: ------ King County has received an application to develop property at the address listed above. You are receiving this notice because our records Indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet of the proposal. Type2 NOA ' I g I ~ I 1 I ~ I i I I I ! ii I !I I ! -------------- r----, I I I I I I II I j L ____ J r---, I I I , I I I ' I • I I I I ~ L ___ .J I I j j ' I ' I j i j ' I i i =, ~I >------· I r---- : I I ~ L __ , __ ' ' ,------ ' cc, (/) = = llJ <'-J = 0 "' 0 () ~ ' ' 6I99600221/L08S0021 ANARDI NICKLAUS J 18040 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600100/L08S0021 BOGOLYUBOV KONSTANTINE 16721 SE NEWPORT WAY ISSAQUAH WA 98027 6I97200323/L08S002I CARDOSO ANA M 18019 I I8TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 RN/L08S002 I . CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION !055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 6196600480/L08S002I EDWARDS JAMES+LISA 17812 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 6I97200026/L08S0021 FERNALD THOMAS F JR+DISSEL, II6I9SE I80THST RENTON WA 98058 6 I 96600I 80/L08S002 I GILL JAGDEV S+SUKHWANT K I 1620 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6I96600542/L08S0021 GUA BRAD A+CINDY L I 1820 SE I80TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6I96600465n,o8soo2I HOLT TIMOTHY & KERRY I 7806 II 8TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 3323059042n,08S002I MARGULLIS GORDON+SUSAN 18032 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6 I 99600200/L08S002 I BAGLEY WILLIAM E & DIANNA L I 8002 I 20TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 6I96600I20/L08S0021 BUCKMEIER LLOYD M+MARLENE J 16547 I2IST AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6 I 96600260/L08S002 I CHIDESTER JEFFREY PARKER CHIDESTER VICI I 8450 SE I 68TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6196600285/L08S002I DIAS WILLIAM R & JUDY K 17809118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6 I 97200360/L08S002 I EDWARDS PATRICA GWENN 18015 120TH SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600521/L08S0021 FLORENCE GORDON J 17852 I 18TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 3 820400080/L08S002 I GOODLOELL W 932 I S 225TH PL KENT WA 98031 6I97200384/L08S0021 HAMIL TON MICHAEL 0 I 8033 I 20TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 6I99600201/L08S002I IVANOV PANAIOT 18018 120TH AVE SE RENTON W /I 98058 6196600481/L08S0021 MCGOUGH JEFFRY A & CYNTHIA 17832 I 18TH AVE NE RENTON WA 98058 3820400020/L08S0021 BENNETT WILLIS A JR & MARY I 1815 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6197200402/L08S0021 CAMPBELL SCOTT A+L YNDEE R I 8043 I 20TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 6197200403/L08S0021 CHURCH DANNY K 18052 I 18TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6197200382/L08S0021 DILAG CHERYL 18038 I 18TH AVE SE RENTON W /I 98058 3820400060/L08S0021 ENDRES MARK+SIIERRY PO BOX 58485 RENTON WA 98058 6197200318/L08S0021 FRONING JULIE K 11641 SE 180TH RENTON WA 98058 6196600440/L08S0021 GOUGH THOMAS+SHIRLEY 17644 I 18TH AVE SE RENTON W /I 98058 6196600219/L08S0021 HOLMGREN CHRIS S+CYNTHIA L 17845 I 18TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 SD9/L08S0021 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #415 G. ANDERSON, PLANT & FACILITIES I 2033 SE 256TH ST KENT W /I 9803 I 6I96600280/L08S002I MITCHELL H W 17803 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 '• 6199600I99/L08S0021 MULLEN LETA L 6715 WHITMAN STNE TACOMA WA 98422 6197200363/L08S0021 PRIDEAUX RONALD L 18019 120TH SE RENTON WA 98058 6197200383/L08S0021 ROOTKENW 18036118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600544/L08S0021 SAMUDRE VINA Y V & REBECCA J 18216 124TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98031 6196600460/L08S0021 SCHULZ RICHARD L+DEBRA D 17802 118TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 6197200361/L08S0021 SI-IA W JOI-IN M+DEBRA K 22201 SWEENEY RD SE MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 3323059103/L08S002 l SKAGEN MICHAEL !+LAURA 12050 SE 178TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6196600543/L08S0021 SU CHANG HUl+MA MICHAEL S 11828 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 3820400050/L08S0021 WALTERS DEAN C 11839 SE l 80Tl·l RENTON WA 98055 6197200380/L08S0021 WIEHOFF JAMES E JR 18031 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600221/L08S0021 O'KEEFE ROGER G 17853 118TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 6197200401/L08S0021 RATHBUN WO 18045 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 6196600240/L08S0021 ROYER WILSON MILLER 17831 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6199600202/L08S0021 SCHAFER SCOTT C 18020 120TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 6197200321/L08S0021 SEATTLE BONDED COLL C/0 SHARON WEEMS 6525 EARL A VE NW SEATTLE WA 98117 3274850170/L08S0021 SHEELY KEVIN D+CJNDY J 12214 SE 179TH PL RENTON WA 98058 3820400030/L08S0021 STECKLER DAVID !+ELAINE L 11823 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 3323059048/L08S0021 TRAN BRENDAN 12055 SE 1781'1-l ST RENTON WA 98058 6196600165n"08S0021 WEBSTER GARRY+KIRSTEN 17906 116TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600201/L08S0021 WILLIAMS CLARK A 17861 l 18Tll AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 3820400010/L08S0021 O'NEAL ILENE A 18010 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 SD l 3/L08S0021 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT #403 R. STRACKE, FACILITIES & PLANNING 1220 N 4TH ST RENTON WA 98055 61972003 8 l /L08S0021 SALTER SHIRLEY 11036 19TH AVE SW SEATTLE WA 98146 6197200379/L08S0021 SCHMIDT SCHERYL 18037 120Tll AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 6197200324/L08S0021 SEVRUK 131LL D+CYNTHIA S 11649 SE 180Tl-l ST RENTON WA 98058 6196600482/L08S0021 SHIRAZ! ELAINE S 17824 118Tll AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600541/L08S0021 STECKLER JAMES & VICTORIA 11806 SE 180TII ST RENTON WA 98058 6196600300/L08S0021 VENABLE l·IAROLD+HELEN 17645 l l 8Tll A VE SE · RENTON WA 98058 6196600160/L08S002 I WEISBERG NANCY M+TAMARA B 17914116THAVESE RENTON WA 98058 6196600540/L08S0021 WILSON ED 17844 120TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98055 .,;., . '• 6197200025/L08S0021 WILSON ROSEMARIE 11633 SE 180TH RENTON WA 98058 3820400040/L08S002 I ZAYIC JERRY IHSHERYL L 11831 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 , • ,,c· ;...;. fl) tJ /f-5TR, j f3_t f; I I FD40 (E Renton) FD25 Fire Protection Dist #40 Fire Protection Dist #25 10828 SE 176th St P.O. Box 2925 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98056-0925 LJ15 MS; KSt· IB-l!!;ll KC27 Falrwood Library Gary Kriedt 17009 -140th Av SE KC Metro Envirn. Planning Renton WA 98058 LJ20 LJ23 Highlands Library Kent Regional Library 2902 NE 12th St 212 --2nd Av N Renton WA 98056 Kent WA 98032-4482 LJ36 Documents Dept. Librarian LJ24 Renton Library King County Library System 100 Mill Av 5 960 Newport Way NW Renton WA 98055 Issaquah, WA 98027 PL18 PL19 Kent Engineering Dept Kent Planning Dept 220 -4th Av 5 220 -4th Av 5 Kent WA 98032 Kent WA 98032 City of Renton PL33 Clinton G. Marsh, Director Fae. & Const. Dept SD9 Economic Development Dept. Kent School District # 415 1055 5. Grady Way 12033 SE 256th St. Bldg B Renton WA 98055 Kent WA 98031-6643 SES R. Stracke, Facilities & Ping SD13 Kent Sewer Utility Renton School Dist # 403 220 -4th Av 5 1220 N 4th St Kent WA 98032 Renton WA 98055 TRl Environmental Review Section ST17 Muckleshoo Tribe/Fisheries Division WA State Dept of Ecology 39015 -172nd Av SE PO Box 47703 Auburn WA 98002 Olympia WA 98504-7703 TR3 Fisheries Biologist TR2 Snoqualmie Tribe Puyallup Tribe PO Box 280 6824 Pioneer Wy E Carnation WA 98014-0280 Puyallup WA 98371 Fisheries Habitat/Environment TR5 TR4 Suquamlsh Indian Tribe Tulalip Tribe PO Box 498 6700 Totem Beach Rd Suquamish WA 98392 Tulalip WA 98271 .::: . . ~-- Cedar River Water/Sewer Dist 18421 SE Petrovltsky Rd Renton WA 98058-0552 City of Renton, Public Works Dept. Development Services Div. 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Water Dist #90 15606 SE 128th St Renton WA 98059-8522 Water Dist #111 27224 -144th Av SE Kent WA 98042-9058 WA State Dept. of Wildlife Habitat Mgmt. Division P.O. Box 43155 Olympia, WA 98504-3155 WA State Dept of Archaeology Attn: Scott Williams P.O. Box 48343 Olympia WA 98504-8343 WD12 WD32 WD55 WD58 Public Works Dtr Kent Water Dist 220 -4th Av S Kent WA 98032 Soos Creek Water/Sewer Dist PO Box 58039 Renton WA 98058-1039 Coal Creek Utility District 6801 132nd Place SE Newcastle, WA 98059 WA State Dept. of Wildlife 16018 Mill Creek Blvd. Mill Creek, WA 98012 Muckleshoot Preservation Program Laura Murphy 39015 172"" Ave SE Auburn WA 98092-9763 WD23 WD41 WD57 TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY (i) King County State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Service, Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Purpose of the checklist I /I The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW Chapter 43.21 C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for the applicants This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to detennine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations such as zoning, shoreline and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. · The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. K.C. D.D.E.S. TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT A. BACKGROUND. I. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Wilson 8-Lot Short Plat 2. Names of Applicant: Ed Wilson and Nahn Busse/le, husband and wife, Brenda Tran 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owners/ Applicant: Owners/ Applicant: Agent: 4. Date checklist prepared: February 28, 2008 5. Agency requesting checklist: Ed Wilson and Nahn Busse/le 12029 SE 178" Street Renton, WA 98058 Brenda Tran 12029 SE 178" Street Renton, WA 98058 PK Enterprises 23035 SE 26? Street Maple Valley, WA 98038 (206) 227.7445 Contact: Mr. Phillip Kitzes EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, Land Use Service Division 6. Proposed project timing or schedule (include phasing, if applicable): Upon application being deemed complete: Checklist Review: 1-3 months Land Use Review/Hearing: 6-8 months Engineering Review/Permitting: 4-6 months · Plat Construction: 2-3 months Home construction is expected to begin in the Summer of 2009 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 8. List any environmental infonnation you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. • Level 1 Downstream Analysis prepared by Preferred Engineers, LLC, • Critical Areas Determination Report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. • Addendum (Critical Areas Determination Report) prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. • Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc. 9. Do you know of pending applications for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None are known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposals, if known. • Preliminary/Final Short Plat Review • SEPA Review • Final Engineering Review (County and Utility District) • Right-of-Way Agreements/Utility Easements (Bonneville Power and others) • NPDES Permit (storm water) • Corp of Engineers Permit (possible) • Forest Practice Permit (possible) 11. Give a complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in the checklist which ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is a 8-Lot short subdivision located on a 2.57-acre site. The current zoning is R-6; thus, there is a potential for 15 lots/residences allowed on the property. A majority of the property is in sensitive areas (a wetland and stream) and their associated buffers which reduces the amount of buildable land on the properties. The minimum lot size is 3,600 square feet (40' x 907. Sufficient area is provided for recreation on-site, while the proposed storm water pond will be located off-site (easement required-same ownership). Direct access will come from 11B"' Avenue SE (2 lots) and SE 180th Street (6 lots)- frontage improvements on both roadways is required. Water (12-inch main) and sewer (minimum 8-inch main) w/11 be extended to the project with approvals from Soos Creek (purveyor). 12. Location of the proposal. Please give sufficient infonnation for a person to understand the precise location of your project, including street address, if any. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, please provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Please provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if possible. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to the checklist. (Indicate if maps or plans have been submitted as part of a permit application). TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT EVALUATION POR AGENCY USB ONLY The properties are vacant and there is no address available. Again, one property {Tran) is accessible from 11Ef' Avenue SE and the Assessor's Parcel Number is 619660-0520. The second property (Wilson and Busse/le) is served from SE 1Bd" Street and the Assessor's Parcel Number is 619660-0540. Both properties are located within the Northwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington. (Please see enclosed vicinity map and legal descriptions.) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS. 1. Earth. a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other ______ _ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent of slope}: The site generally slopes in a northeasterly direction with the steepest slope on site being an isolated area with 10-15 percent downward gradient slope. c. What general types of soil are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, please specify and note any prime farmland. The soils onslte consist of Aldetwood Gravelly Sandy Loam {AgB and AgC) and Seattle Muck (Sk) so/ls according to the National Resources conservation Service Survey. {Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no known surface indications of unstable soils on, or in the immediate vicinity of the proposed site location. (Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils end Environmental Engineers, Inc.) e. Describe the purposes, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading will be limited to the construct/on of the proposed road and acr:ess tract, lots, water, sewer, other utilities, recreation areas, and the proposed detention facility. There will be approximately 3,000 cubic yards of cut and fill within this project. The project will attempt to balance the amount of cut and fill, so that no additional Import or export of material should be necessary. If any import or export of material necessary for this project it will be approved at TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT final engineering and obtained from or deposited to a County approved site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion could occur during clearing and grading operations associated with this project. To minimize the impacts of the project, appropriate erosion control measures will be reviewed and approved by the County prior to construction activity associated with this project. (Please sea Report of Gaotachnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The total lot area is roughly 111,829 square feat. The area within the public road to be constructed is 2,550 square feat-off-site (within existing right-of-way). With approximately 33,678 square feat in the lots and assuming a maximum 55% impervious surface par lot (Code), there is a total of 18,523 square feat additional impervious surface. Thus, the total new impervious surface area is 21,073 square feat, or 19 percent of the entire site. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction, various measures are expected to. be used to control erosion. These methods include construction during the dry season, . the use of silt fences and hay bails, and revegetation of disturbed areas. Specific temporary erosion and sediment control measures will be reviewed and approved by the County prior to construction. (Please sea Report of Gaotachnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) 2. AIR. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke, greenhouse gases) during construction, and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Temporary ammissions (i.e. dust, vehicle related, ate.) from equipment will occur during the construction phase of this project. Upon completion, there will be additional ammisssions from the residences (fireplaces) and residents (automotive, etc.). (Please sea enclosed worksheet for green house gases provided by the County.) b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor which may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Other than the existing residences and vehicular movements along SE 18d1' Street and 11 ll" A venue SE, there are none to our knowledge. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts, if any: Construction equipment will comply with applicable air quality regulations, as prescribed by the County, State and Federal regulations. Dust emissions will be controlled during site construction by the use of best management practices, including periodic watering of disturbed areas. The project will not rely upon wood burning fireplaces as the primary source of heat for the new homes. All new homes will use natural gas and/or electricity to provide heat, reducing emissions caused by wood burning fires. 3. WATER. a. Surface: I) Is there any surface water on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, associated wetland)? If yes, describe type, provide names, and, if known, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. On-site, there is an existing wetland (Wetland AB) and stream (seasonal tributary) on. the project site. Also, thera are several wetlands and streams off-site of this property-including a portion of Big Soos Creek. (For a complete listing of the surface water bodies, please see report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.- includes location and type.) 2) Will the project require any work over or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The entira development is within 200 feet of these water bodias; thus, construction activity will occur within 200 feet of said waters. It may be necessary to extend water (12-inch) and sewer (8-inch minimum) through portions of the buffers to serve the development-both on-and off-site: (Please see enclosed water and sewer analysis from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District.) In addition, it may be necessary to extend other utilities within these same sensitive areas. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate source of fill materials. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY UBB ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT At this time, there is no proposed filling or dredging being proposed to construct the development. However, there may be a need for dredging and/or filling based on the design of Soos Creek Water and Utility District for water and sewer extensions onto Iha project site and/or from adjacent properties. If required, the source of fill would be manufactured on-site with native soils. 4) Will surface water withdrawals or diversions be required by the proposal? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a JOO-year floodplain? Note location on the site plan, if any. Not to our knowladge. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: I) Will ground water be withdrawn or recharged? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste water material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any ( for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): I) Describe the source of runoff and storm water and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will the water flow into other waters? If so, please describe. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY UBB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Storm water runoff from road improvements and residences will be collected via a series of connected pipes to be ultimately discharged into an off-site water quality/detention facility. This facility would be for water quality purposes only. Once treated, Iha water will be discharged at the lowest natural point, to the existing stream channel-Big Soos Creek. (Please see Drainage Report and Conceptual Drainage Plan prepared by Preferred Engineering, LLC). 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. The proposal includes a water quality treatment component to the pond that will filter out contaminants prior to entering ground and/or surface waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: All development and engineering requirements Imposed by the County to control the impacts to the hydrology of the area will be performed by the proponent. These indude design of the stormwater facilities pursuant to the 2005 KCSWDM. 4. PLANTS. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ..1QL deciduous tree: alder. maple, aspen, other: cottonwood ..JQL evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: ..JQL shrubs: ..1QL grass ..JQL pasture crop or grain ..1QL wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other: salmonberry water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation (For a complete list of wet soil/water flora, please see report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Vegetation for the road Improvements and residences will be removed. In addition, there may be the need to remove vegetation EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT with the wetland/stream buffers for utilities raquiring a mitigation plan. c. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on near the site. None, to our knowledge. d. List proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The development will hava a park area that will be planted according to an approved landscape plan prepared during the final engineering phase. In doing so, the developer will be compliant with the existing codes and regulations required by the County with respect to preservance or enhancement of existing vegetation on the site. 5. ANIMALS. a. Circle (underline) any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or. are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ____ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: rodents Fish: bass, salmon, trout, shellfish, other: ____ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None are proposed at this time •• 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES. a. What kinds of energy ( electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and/or natural gas will be used to meet the project's energy needs for light and heat. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List any other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Construction of the new homes will meet or exceed the necessary energy requirements of the Northwest Energy Code, the 2005 International Building Code, and those additionally adopted by the County. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. a. Are there any environmental health hazards, exposure to toxic chemicals, including risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. I. Describe Special Emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are proposed at this time. b. Noise. I. What type of noise exists in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing vehicular traffic along SE 1Bdh Streat and 11B'h Avenue SE. 2. What types of levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during site development. Construction would occur primarily during the daylight hours, and in compliance with all EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT applicable codes. Heavy equipment, hand tools, and the transporting of construction equipment generate construction noise. At 200 feet from the construction, Leq would be approximately the following: Activitv Clearing Excavation Foundations Building Construction Finishing Lea fin decibels J 71-72 59-77 65 60-72 62-77 Long-term impacts would be those associated with the increase in site users. Additional traffic would be generated by future uses. Tne increase in noise would be typical of a single-family residential development of this size and would be considered minimal. Sound levels for various noise sources include: Noise Sources Automobile Starting Closing Car Door Loud Voices Automobile/Truck Traffic Sound Level at . 100 feet (dBA J 50-55 50-55 50 50 3. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction activities will be perfonned during normal daytime working hours and comp!lant with the rules and regulations set forth by King County. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE. a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Both properties are vacant and undeveloped. Tne following is the known current uses of the adjacent properties: • North • South • East • West Slngle-family residences Single-family residences Single-family residence Single-family residences b. Has the site been used for agricultural purposes? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. EVALUATION !!'OR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Again, there is a single-family residence with associated outbuildings present on the property. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not applicable. e. What is the current zoning of the site? The current zoning is single family residential R-6 (6 units per acre). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan designation is urban residential, medium (Single Family, 4-12 units per acre). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program environment designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. As stated previously, there is an existing wetland and stream on this . particular property. {Please see the Critical Areas Determination Report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.) 1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Based on a household occupancy rate of 2.92 people per single- family residence, it Is expected that approximately 26 new people will reside In the eight (8) new residences. J. Proposed measures to reduce displacement impacts, if any? None are proposed at this time. k. What are the proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed 8-lot short subdivision with single-family residences is consistent with recent and existing development in the area, current zoning, and comprehensive plan designations. The project will be compliant with the County Code. BVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT 9. HOUSING. a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It Is expected that the project will provide up to 8 new single-family resident/al units in the middle income level b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 10. AESTHETICS. a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s) not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material( s) proposed? nie County's zoning code restricts the building heights of single- family residential structures to 35'. Exterior materials will typically consist of wood or hardy backer type siding with brick, rock, or shingle accents. Specific materials will be determined by the home bu/Ider at the time of building permit and will comply with applicable County regulations. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any? None are proposed at this time. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE. a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? EVALUATION FOR AGENCY UBB ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Light and/or glare would occur primarily during evening and night time hours and would be limited to any new street lights, house lights, . and minimal security lighting potentially within the park spaces. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your project? None. d. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 12. RECREATION. a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Maplewood Golf Course and Ron Regis Park are approximately 3.3miles north of the site. Another golf course, Faitwood Golf and Country Club, is approximately 2.1 miles to the east of this project A bit closer, also to the east, Is Renton Park along 13d" Avenue SE b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The project is proposing to construct an on-site park area to serve the new residents. A development of this size (8 lots) requires 3,120 square feet (8 times 390 square feet) of recreation space which will be provided on-site. · EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION. a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on the site. None are known. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 14. TRANSPORTATION. a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any: Both portions of this project are Immediately aa:essible to SE 18d1' Street and 18d1' Avenue SE, connecting to SE 176" Street (Petrovitsky}, which connects directly to SR 167 and SR 405. (Please see Preliminary Plat for proposed aa:ess point). b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. nie nearest public bus aa:ess is at the intersection of 11 d" Avenue SE and SE 176" Street, which Is approximately one-half mile northwest of this project (Bus Route 155). c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Assuming a minimum of 4 parking spaces per household (2-car garage and a 2-car driveway), there will be at least 32 new parking spaces provided upon completion of this development. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or street, or improvements to any existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). EVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Frontage improvements to both SE JB<f' Street and 11£1" Avenue SE will likely be required. Will the project use or occur in the immediate vicinity of water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Based on the /TE Manual, there will be approximately 80 net new tips per day generated by this project. Peak volumes would most likely occur during typical rush hour times of 7:00 -9:00 AM and 4:00 -6:00 PM and would add approximately 8 net new AM peak and PM peak hour trips. g. What are proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The applicant will be responsible for appropriate traffic mitigation fees, which will offset some of the Impacts of the subdivision. Other mitigation Includes the construction of new roads to serve the project. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES. a. Would the project result in an increase need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes. There would be a minimal Increased need for fire and police protection due to an additional 8 new lots In the area. Also, there will be a minimal Impact on the present school system. b. What are proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: Property taxes, building permits and school impact mitigation fees generated from these residences are expected to mitigate Impacts incurred from this development. EVALUATION POR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT 17. UTILITIES. a. Circle (underline) utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: cable television. b. Describe the utilities which are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity: Gas: Water: Refuse: Telephone: sewer: Cable: Puget Sound Energy Puget Sound Energy Soos Creek Water District Waste Management Qwest communications Soos Creek Sewer District Comcast Connectioil(s) to the above mentioned utilities will be negotiated with the individual purveyor during the building permit and construct/on phases of this project. There may also be a need for a right-of-way permit(s) to gain access to the property at construction. There may also be a need to extend an 8-inch or greater line (water and/or sewer) that will be determined at final engineering approval by the utility purveyor. C. SIGNATURE. The above answers are true to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Agent for the Applicant: ----------- Date Submitted: -------- EVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USB ONLY WILSON-TRAN 8-LOT SHORT PLAT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (619660-0520) LOT 8, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUN"IY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE SOUTH 90 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET THEREOF. (619660-0540) LOT 9, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUN"IY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE WEST 375 FEET. MapQuest: Maps, Addresses, Business Directory & Satellite Photos --- 17844 120th Ave Se Renton WA 98058-6648 us Notes: nly text visible within note field will print. All rlahts reserved. Use Subiect to Llceose/Coovdaht saveJnk! ~d maps.and dir;ections. ·tOJOUr mobile.phone· ]jilt5Nowt -,.j ,-::.: _ , f 1' joule~· ",:: ·~rrr;:;/:,:r·t:::], tanci . ,,,.:. " .-:~ t ,. . --~, /1 MM Page I of I This map Is Informational only. No representation Is made or warranty given as to Its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. http://www.mapquest.com/maps/print.adp?mapdata=p5kqyoo6yZK6Lfz0bzPBTCoEK3raj ... 2/28/2008 Section I: Buildings Emissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet MTC02e Embodied Ener 98 33 54 41 Education ........................................... . 0.0 39 Food Sales ......................................... . 0.0 39 Food Service ...................................... . 0.0 39 1.994 Hes Ith Care In atlent ......................... . 0.0 39 1,938 582 Heslth Care Ou !lent ...................... . 0.0 39 737 571 Lod In .............................................. . 0.0 39 777 117 Reta II Other Than Mall ...................... . 0.0 39 577 247 Office .................................................. . 0.0 39 723 588 0.0 39 733 150 0.0 39 899 374 0.0 39 339 129 0.0 39 599 266 0.0 39 352 181 0.0 39 1,278 257 0.0 39 162 47 Section II: Pavement ......................... . 127500! Total Project Emissions: 139995! Version 1. 7 12/28/07 Sources; 111, ... Residential Commercial DefiniUon of Building Tunes Type (Residential) or Principal Activity Commercial) Description Unless otherwise specified, this includes both attached and detached SinAle-Famlly Home .................................. buildlnAS Multi-Family Unit in Laroe Buildlna ........... Aoartments in bulldinas with more than 5 units Multi-Family Unit in Small Buildlna ........... A =rtments In bulldlna with 2-4 units Mobile Home ............................................. Buildings used for academic or technical classroom instruction, such as elementary, middle, or high schools, and classroom buildings on college or university campuses. Buildings on education campuses for which the main use is not classroom are included in the category relating to their use. For example, administration buildings are part of "Office," dormitories are Education .................................................. "lodalna." and libraries are "Public Assemblv." Food Sales ............................................... Buildinos used for retail or wholesale of food. Buildings used for preparaUon and sale of food and beverages for Food Service ............................................ consumotion. Health Care lnoatient ................................ Buildings used as diagnostic and treatment facilities for lnoatient care. Bulldlngs used as diagnostic and treatment facilities for outpatient care. Docto~s or dentist's office are Included here If they use any type of diagnostic Health Care Outpatient ............................. medical Anuloment Of thev do not, thev are catAnorized as an office buildina). Buildings used to offer multiple accommodations for shorHerm or long-term lodoino ..................................................... residents, including skilled nursing and other residential care bulldings. Retail !Other Than Malll. ........................... Buildings used for the sale and display of goods other than food. Buildings used for general office space, professional office, or administrative offices. Doctor's or dentist's office are included here if they do not use any type of diagnostic medical equipment (if they do, they are categorized as an Office ........................................................ outruitient health care buildinol. Buildings In which people gather for social or recreatlonal activities, whether in Public Assemblv ....................................... orlvate or non-orivate meetino halls. Public Order and Safetv ........................... Buildinos used for the oreservatlon of law and order or oublic safetv. Buildings In which people gather for religious activities, (such as chapels, Reliaious Worshio .................................... churches, mosoues, svnannnues, and temolesl. Buildings In which some type of service is provided, other than food service or Service ...................................................... retail sales of goods Buildings used to store goods, manufactured products, merchandise, raw Warehouse and Storage .......................... materials, or ""rsonal belonalnas (such as self-storage). Buildings that are industrial or agricultural with some retail space; buildings having several different commercial activities that, together, comprise 50 percent or mere of the floorspace, but whose largest single activity Is agricultural, industrial/ manufacturing, or residential; and all other Other ......................................................... miscellaneous buildings that do not fit into any other cateoorv. Buildings In which more floorspace was vacant than was used for any single commerc!al activity at the time of interview. Therefore, a vacant building may Vacant ...................................................... have some occuoled floorsru:ace. 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.ela.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqfl-measure.html Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS), Description of CBECS Building Types http://www.ela.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/pba99/bldgtypes.html Erl1,o:1led Em1:ss1cm Worksheet 8ec:tlon l: .......... TW9 (Realdentlal) or Pnnclpal ActMtyl (Cornrnmt:t.l' ·-......... ~ Life span Rliati,d -GHG 1a-·--·························· M!Jftt-F Unit In \.!19! ~ ..... _ .. Uuttl-F Llnit In Sma11 Buldiro ....... .. --2.53 0.65 1.39 l.!J6 missions (MTC02eil ,e,l!l .!!!. ..._ .!!!. ,i Ufe ~ related embodied GHG rnlssloos (MTC02el thous8"d squ8ffl feet) • See ~ In table below -'l'l_ -'l'l_ 39 :iii: A.....-.ge OWP (lbs C02&'sq fl.): Vlll"ICOU\lel". low Rise"'""'"'" Avenige Mat9rials in 11 2,272-squan, foot """'° =· ....... All elm In bl.ck tllllt R~denti..111 floofspace per unrt F~e pet" buildlr,g Average GWP (lbs C02efsq ft): Vancouww. Low Rise Bulding AveraiJe Materials in a 2.272-square foot 51r,gllt family home ,>..~tta;~ ..,;,l(J.J ... :,i:,.l,! ~-·--, . ..,_,,, ··-··· Food Sales -·-···-··---····-···-·-······· Food Service -·-···-·--·-··-.. •• Hesllh C.. lnpflient .. ·······-················· --Retail (OlherThan Mall). ....................... .. Office .............................................. . Publlc Anembly """" """' ""' ~ 5erYlce ····-··· Warehause and Stpra ..................... ... Other··---··----------·-··-···· ................. . Vacent .. Section D: Pa-.nt.... IM Types of Pavement..,... eo.mn,""'...,,, ,., 0.0 0.0 25.6 i.6 5.6 ~ 1M fil .P. 14.B 14.2 15.5 .1Q1 6.5 16.9 21.9 14.1 -A= 7.8 2269.0 ., ,., 217 217 ~ '°' '~ fil. !573 550 600 391 202 654 ... ... ._.,,w.,, 19.1 32"6.0 "'·' King County, ONRP. Contact: Matt Kuherie. rnatt.kuharic:@~~ 2001 Resioential Ene:tQvConsun,mlon $1.1'\'0y(Na~ Average. 2001) Soum-e footage measurements and ccmpari$ons http:1/ww#.eia.doe.gQ:Vlemeulrecslsqft-,ure.html ElA.. 2003 COmfnerctal Bulldlrlg$ Enetgy Consumption Su,vey (Nattonal Avtnge, 2003) 39 39 :iii: 39 :iii: 39 39 :iii: li 39 :iii: ,. 39 :iii: li :l!l -512 11:;!; c, ••• Table CJ. Consumption and. Gross Energy lntonsityfor Sum of MajOr Fuels for Nor,.Ma!I Bulldi1"19G. 2003 http:l!WWW.eia.do&.gov/emeufc:bees/cbec,2003/detai!ed_ tables_ 2003/2003set9/2003e,ccel/c:l~, Alhena Ec:cCeln damr Athena Assembly Evaluation Tool v2.~ VenctJUIICIT low Rise Buildlng Assembly A-...ge GWP (kg) per IQU8f1I: meter http://ww,t..e:tnenasmlcafoeoCalculatDr1'html lbs per kg 2.20 Square feet per squaAI meter 10.76 Bulldlogs Energy Data !k:ol,.: 7 .3 T ypbl{Average Household. Materials Used in the Construction of a 2.272·SqU8rCI-Foot $ingi&-Famity Home. 2000 http;//bulldlngsdatabook.eren.doe.pnkr-vlwl _book_ t.able&TablelD="2036&t-xls See mo: NAHB. 2004 Housing Facts. Figures and. Trend.s, Feb. 2004, p. 7. E•~".l'I lnt(-rrr-.at,or, ,l,.\nlir,i$t:;1til.ln'Ht11.i:,:J,iq (hAr.:i:;1c;t:c.!,::;. 1•N,'.• Append,, a Crua<t-; ci tile-~ .. ""11 F-g r, l!=~',i'!p. e,;9_,:i. ..,_g,..-f::,...;1),1~-n?'JOl>:••~.Mfl'l'\l.:al:, ... !-'10. p,:,/ ·-Wm .... 5.7 21.3 '"" Tel111 Embodied Embodied --(MTC02e{ 6050.0 3103.0 (MTCQ2el ----,., 30.0 88.0 38.7 Pavomant Emis.lOlt$ FilC'tCl's MTC02althousand tq\late 1ttt of asph>II or conerani pave!Nflf Embodltd GHG Emh11toot Buiklings ~ fseabelowl Workshoot Backmound Information Embodied GHG emissions ere emissions that ere created through the extraci!on. processing, transportation. construction and disposal of buUdlng matertals as well as emlsslons created through landscape disturbance (by both soil disturbance and changes tn above ground biomass). Estimating embodied GHG emissions is new field of analysis; the estimates are rapidly improving and becoming more inclusive of all elements of construction and development TIMI estimate included in this wor1tsheet is calculated using average values for the main construction materials that are used to creat:B a typical family home. In 2004. the National Association of Home Builders calculated the average materials that are used tn a typical 2,2n square foot stngle...family househOld. The quantity of materials used is Ulen muttlplled by the average GHG emlsslons associated with Ule llfe-cyde GHG emlssions for each material. This estlmat:B is a rough and conservative estimate; the actual embodied emissions for a project are llkety to be hlgher. For example, at this stage, due to a lack of comprehensive data, the estimate does not tndude Important factors such as landscape disturbance or the emlSSionS associated with the Interior components of a building (such as furniture). King County reallzes Ulat the calculations for embodied emissions tn Ulis worksheet are rough. For example, the emissions associated with building 1,000 square feet of a residential buOdlng wW not be the same as 1,000 square feet of a commerctal building. However, discussions with the construction community Indicate that while there are significant differences between the different types of structures. this method of estimation is reasonable; It win be Improved as more data become available. Additionally, if more spedftc Information about the project is known, King County recommends two online embodied emissions calculators that can be used to obtain a more taUored estimate for embodied emlsslons: www bul'dcarbonneutral org and www athenasmi c:altoo's/ecoCalcutator/- Pawment Four recent life cycie assessments of the environmental Impacts of roads fonn the basis for the per unit embodied emissions of pavement. Each study Is constructed In Slightly different ways; however, the aggregate results of the reports represent a reasonable estimate of the GHG emlss!ons that are created from the manufacture of paving materials, construction related emlsskms, and maintenance of the pavement over Its expected lite cycle. For specifics, see the wor1tsheet 5e,c1a1 Section: Esttmat1ng tht Embodlecl Emfs1ions tor Pavement Four recent life cyda assessments of the envtronmental Impacts of roads form the basis for the per unit embodied emissions of pavement Each study Is constructed in slightly different ways; however, the aggregate results of the reports represent a reasonable estimate of the GHG emissions that are created from the manufacture of paving materials, construction related emlsslons, and maintenance of the pawmant over its expected UFe cycle. Tile results of the studies are presentod in different units and measures; considerable effort was undertaken to be able to compare the results of the studies in a reasonable way. For mon, details about the below methodology, contact ma1Lkuharlc@-unty.gov. The four studies. Mell (2001), Park (2003), Stripple (2001) and Treolar(2001) produced total GHG emissions of4-34 MTC02e per thousand square feet of finlshed paving (for similar asphalt and concrete based paWITlents). This estlma18 does not lndudlng downstream maintenance and repair of the highway. Tile average (for all concrme and asphalt pavements tn the studies, 8$SUrTlU1Q each study gets one data point) Is -17 MTC02elthousand square feet. Three of the studies attempted to thoroughly account for the emlsslons associated with long term maintenance (40 years) of the roads. Sb1pple (2001), Park et al. (2003) and Treolar (2001) report 17, 81, and 68 MTC02elthousand square feet, respectlvaly, after accounting for maintenance of the roads. Based on the abow discussion, King County makes the conservative estimate that 50 MTC02elthousand square feet of pawment (over the development's life cyde) will be used as the embodied emission factor for pavement until better estlma1es can be obtained. This Is roughly equivalent to 3,500 MTC02e per lane mile of road (assuming the lane is 13 feet wide). It Is Important to note that these studies estimate the embodied emissions for roads. Paving that does not need to stand up to the rigors of heavy use (such as parking lots or dm.oeways) would likely use less materials and hence have lower embodied emissions. ~ Meil, J. A Life Cycle Perspective on Concrete and Asphalt Roadways: Embodied Primary Energy and Global Wanning Potential. 2006. Available: http·//wytw cement ce/cementnsfleee9ec7bbd6301268525fifk:4QQ52107b/6ec79dc8aeQ3a782852572b90061 b9 14/SflLE/ATTKOWE3/athena%20reoort%20Feb %202%2()2007.pdf Park, K, Hwang, Y .. Seo. S., M.ASCE, and Seo, H., "Quantitative Assessment of Environmental Impacts on Life Cycle of Highways." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management , Vol 129, January/February 2003, pp 25-31, (DOI: 10.1D61/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:1(25)). Strip?9, H. Life Cycle Assessment of Road. A Pilot Study for Inventory Analysis. Second Revised Edition. JVl Swedish Environmental Researt:h Institute Ltd. 2001. Available: httQ·/OWffl.M.sefraoporterlodf/81210E-odf Treloar, G., Love, P.E.O., and Crawford. R.H. Hybrid Life.cycle Inventory for Road Construction and Use. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management P. 4349. January/February 2004. Ene'"'' Emissions Wnritc,h-t Type (Residential) or Prlnclpal AcUvity lCommercial Sincle-Famllv Horne .............................. MultJ-Familv Unit tn Larae Buildina ....... Multl-FamilV Unit In Small Buildina ..... Mobile Horne .......................................... Education .............................................. Food Sales ............................................ Food Service ......................................... Health Care lnru:itient ......................... Health Care <11ITTUIT!fll!nt ••••••••••••••••••••.•••. Lodolno ................................................ Retall {Other Than Mall) •..•.••.••.•.•.......... Office .................................................... Public Assemk"• ................................... Publlc Order and Safetv •..••••.••.••..•.•..•... Relioious Worship ..•.•...•.••.•.•..•.....•........ Service .................................................. Warehouse and Stora[Jfll ....................... Other ..................................................... Vacant ................................................... Sources All data in black text Energy consumption for resklential buildings Energy consumption for commercial buildings and Floorspace per building Carbon Coefficient for Buildings Resldential floorspace per unit '"-~----~ .... --.... _. -~ ·---···-------- Enerm Floorspace MTCEpe, consumption per Camon per Building thousand MTC02eper bulldlng per year Coefficient for MTC02eper (thousand square feet per thousand square lmHllon Btu BuUdlnas buildlna per ·-"'r square feet vear feet per vear 107.3 0.108 11.61 2.53 4.6 16.8 41.0 0.108 4.44 0.85 5.2 19.2 78.1 0.108 8.45 1.39 6.1 22.2 75.9 0.108 8.21 1.06 7.7 28.4 2.125.0 0.124 264.2 25.6 10.3 37.8 1.110.0 0.124 138.0 5.6 24.6 90.4 1.436.0 0.124 178.5 5.6 31.9 116.9 60.152.0 0.124 7,479.1 241.4 31.0 113.6 985.0 0.124 122.5 10.4 11.8 43.2 3.578.0 0.124 444.9 35.8 12.4 45.6 720.0 0.124 89.5 9.7 9.2 33.8 1,376.0 0.124 171.1 14.8 11.6 42.4 1.338.0 0.124 166.4 14.2 11.7 43.0 1,791.0 0.124 222.7 15.5 14.4 52.7 440.0 0.124 54.7 10.1 5.4 19.9 501.0 0.124 62.3 6.5 9.6 35.1 764.0 0.124 95.0 16.9 5.6 20.6 3.600.0 0.124 447.6 21.9 20.4 74.9 294.0 Q_124 36.6 14.1 2.6 9.5 King County, DNRP. Contact Matt Kuharic, matt.kuharic@kingcounty.gov 2007 Bulldlngs Energy Data Book: 6.1 Quad Definitions and Comparisons (National Average, 2001) Table 6.1.4: Average Annual Carbon Dioxide Emissions for Various Functions http://buildingsdatabook..eren.doe.gov/ Data also at httpJ/www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/recs2001_ce/ce1-4c_houslngunits2001.html EIA. 2003 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2003) Table C3. Consumption and Gross Energy Intensity for Sum of Major Fuels for Non-Mall Buildings. 2003 http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detai1ed_tables_2003/2003set9/2003excel/c3.ds Average Lifespan Energy Building Life Related MTC02e Span emissions oer unit 57.9 672 80.5 357 80.5 681 57.9 475 62.5 16,526 62.5 8,632 62.5 11,168 62.5 487,794 62.5 7,660 62.5 27,826 62.5 5,599 62.5 10,701 62.5 10,405 62.5 13,928 62.5 3,422 62.5 3.896 62.5 5.942 62.5 27,997 62.5 2,286 Note: Data in plum color Is found in both of the above sources (buildings energy data book and commercial buildings energy consumption survey). Buildings Energy Data Book (National average, 2005 l Table 3.1. 7. 2005 Carbon Dl01<.ide Emission Coefficients for Buildings (MMTCE per Ouadriilion Btu) http:/lbulldingsdatabook.eere.energy.govi?ld=view_book_tab!e& TablelD=2057 Note: Carbon coefficient in the Energy Data book is in MTCE per Quadrillion Btu. To convert to MTC02e per million Btu. this factor was divided by 1000 and multiplied by 44/12. 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (National Average. 2001) Square footage measurements and comparisons httr,://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sQft-measure.html Lifespan Energy Related MTC02e emissions per thousand .,.,uare feet 266 422 489 448 646 1,541 1,994 1,938 737 m 5n 723 733 899 339 599 352 1,278 162 average lief span of buildings. estimated by replacement time method Single Family Multl-Famlly Units All Residential Homes in Large and Bulldlngs Small Bulldi"""S New Housing Construction, 2001 1,273,000 329.000 1,602,000 Exis1ing Housing Stock, 2001 73,700,000 26,500.000 100,200 000 Replacemen {national time: 57.9 80.5 62.5 average, 2001) Note: Single famlty homes calculation Is used for mobile homes as a best estimate life span. Note: At this time, KC staff could find no reliable data for the average life span of commercial buildlngs. Therefore, the average life span of resldentlal buildings Is being used until a better approximation can be ascertained. ~ New Housing Construction, 2001 Quarterly Starts and Completions by Purpose and Design w US and Regions (E"cel) http://www.census.gov/constJquarter1y_starts_completions_cust.xls See also: http:llwww.census.gov!const/www/newresc0:nstlndex.html Exisijng Housing Stock. 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) 2001 Tables HC1:Houslng Unit Characteristics, Million U.S. Households 2001 Table HC1-4a. Housing Unit Characteristics by Type of Housing Unit. Million U.S. Households, 2001 Million U.S. Households, 2001 http:/lwww.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/recs2001/hc_pdf/housunits/hc1""4a_houslngunlts2001.pdf ··-·~ '""'UUtl ~UU.>.>IUII~ WWUll\.::NICCl Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial Single--Famlrv Home ..•............................... Multi-Famiru Unit In Larae Building ...••...... Multi-Famuv Unit In Small Building ........... Mobile Home ............................................ Education ..............•................................. Food Sales ...••.••.........................•............ Food Sesvlce ........................................... Health Gare ln~nt ............................... Health Care I n~tfent ............................ L I ··•····•············••·•···························· Retall !Other Than MaDl ............................ Office ....................... , ............................... Public Assemmv ...................................... Public Order and Safetv ........................... Reliaious Worship ....•.•............................. Service .................................................... Warehouse and StolHOl'l ...••••••.•............... Other ....................................................... Vacant .........................•.........................•. Sources All data in black text # people/ unit Residential floorspace per unit # employees/thousand square feel vehicle related GHG emissions MTC02e/ # people or (metric tonnes year/ # thousand employees/ C02e per thousand # people/ unit or sq feet/ unit thousand person per MTC02e/ square bulldin~ or buildin~ ~nuare feet •=or \/Aar/ unit feet 2.8 2.53 1.1 4.9 13.7 5.4 1.9 0.85 2.3 4.9 9.5 11.2 1.9 1.39 1.4 4.9 9.5 6.8 2.5 1.06 2.3 4.9 12.2 11.5 30.0 25.6 1.2 4.9 147.8 5.8 5.1 5.6 0.9 4.9 25.2 4.5 10.2 5.6 1.8 4.9 50.2 9.0 455.5 241.4 1.9 4.9 2248.4 9.3 19.3 10.4 1.9 4.9 95.0 9.1 13.6 35.8 0.4 4.9 67.1 1.9 7.8 9.7 0.8 4.9 38.3 3.9 28.2 14.8 1.9 4.9 139.0 9.4 6.9 14.2 0.5 4.9 34.2 2.4 18.8 15.5 1.2 4.9 92.7 6.0 4.2 10.1 0.4 4.9 20.8 2.1 5.6 6.5 0.9 4.9 27.6 4.3 9.9 16.9 0.6 4.9 49.0 2.9 18.3 21.9 0.8 4.9 90.0 4.1 2.1 14.1 0.2 4.9 10.5 0.7 King County. DNRP. Contact: Matt Kuhalic. matt.kuhalic@kingcounty.gov Estimating Household Size for Use in Population Estimates (WA state, 2000 average) Washington State Office of Financial Management Kimpel, T. and Lowe, T. Research Brief No. 47. August 2007 http1/www.ofm.wa.gov/researchbliefs/blief047.pdf Average Building Life Sn::an 57.9 80.5 80.5 57.9 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Note: This anafysls combines Multi Unit Structures in both large and small units into one category; the average is used in this case although there is likely a difference 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2001) Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqft·measure.html life span transportation related GHG emissions (MTC02e/ ""r unit 792 766 766 709 9247 1579 3141 140506 5941 4194 2394 8696 2137 5796 1298 1729 3067 5630 657 Coinmercial Buildmgs Energy Consumption Survey commercial energy uses and costs {National Median, 2003) Table B2 Totals and Medians of Floorspace. Number of Workers, ancs Hours of Operation for Non-Mail Buildings, 2003 htlp://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed_tabtes_2003/2003set112003excel/b2.xls Note. Data for# employees/thousand square feel is presen!ed by CBECS as square feet/employee. Life span transportation related GHG emissions (MTC02e/ thousand sq feet 313 904 550 668 361 282 561 582 571 117 247 588 150 374 129 266 181 257 47 In this analysis employees/thousand square feet is calculated by taking the inverse of the CBECS number and multiplying by 1000. vehicle related GHG emissions Estimate calculated as follows (Washington slate, 2006)_ 56,531,930,000 2006 Annual WA State Vehicie Miles Traveled Data was daily VMT. Annual VMT was 365.daHy VMT. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/mapsdata/tdo/annualmi\eage.htm 6,395,798 2006 WA state population http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/53000.html 8839 vehicle miles per person per year 0.0506 gallon gasoline/mile This is the weighted national average fuel efficiency for all cars and 2 axle, 4 wheel light trucks in 2005. This includes pickup trucks, vans and SUVs. The 0.051 gallons/mile used here is the inverse of the more commonly known term ·miles/per gallon· (which is 19.75 for these cars and ligh1 trucks). Transportation Energy Data Book. 26th Edition. 2006. Chapter 4; Ugh1 Vehicles and Characteristics. Calculations based on ~ighted average MPG efficiency or cars and light trucks. http://cta.oml.gov/data/tedb26/Edltion26_Chapter04.pdf Note: This report states that in 2005, 92.3% of all highway VMT >Nere driven by the above described vehicles. http:J/cta.oml.gov/data/tedb26/Spreadsheets/Table3_04.xls 24.3 lbs C02e/gallon gasoline 2205 The CO2 emissions estimates for gasoline and diesel include the extraction, transport, and refinement of petroleum as well as their combustion. Life-Cycle CO2 Emissions for Various New Vehicles. RENew Northfield. AvaUable: http://renewnorthfield.org/wpcontenUuploads/2006J04/C02%20emlssions.pdf Note: This is a conservative estimate of emissions by fuel consumption because diesel fuel, with a emissions factor of 26.55 lbs C02e/gallon was not estimated. 4.93 lbs/metric tonne vehicle related GHG emissions (metric tonnes C02e per person per year) average lief span of buildings, estimated by replacement time method See Energy Emissions Worksheet for Calculations Commercial floorspace per unit EIA, 2003 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2003) Table C3. Consumption and Gross Energy Intensity for Sum of Major Fuels for Non~Mall Buildings, 2003 http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecsJcbecs2003/detailed_tables_2003/2003set9/2003excel/c3.xls j STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY Subdivision Guarantee Guarantee No.: SG-2631-12237 Effective Date: February 13, 2008 at 12:00 AM Fee: $350.00 OrderNumber: 208163172 The County of KING and any City within which said subdivision is located in a swn not exceeding $1,000.00 That, according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matters affecting the title to the land included within the exterior boundary of said Subdivision Guarantee, the only parties having any record title interest in said land whose signatures are necessary, under the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, on the certificates consenting to the recordation of said map and offering for dedication any streets, roads, avenues and other easements offered for dedication as shown in Subdivision Guarantee. ;r " ,, --·' Signed under seal for the Company, but this Guarantee Is to be valid only when It bears an authorized countersignature . Countersigned by: 4:PcO Authorized Countersignature STEW ART TITLE Company SEATAC, Washington City, State 11 stewart ~---. /\~!}J Senior Chal~;o!(e Board • President Guarantee Serial No. SG-2631-12237 II In writing this company please address It at P .0. Box 2029, Houston, Texas 77252, and refer to the prtnted Sertal Number. K.C. D.D.E.S. ' SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Guarantee No.: SG-2631-12237 Order Number: 208163172 Reference Number: WILSON,BUSSELLE Effective Date: February 13, 2008 at Subdivision Guarantee: Sales Tax: Total: $350.00 $31.15 $ 381.15 OWNERS: EDWARD CHARLES WILSON AND NHAN PHI BUSSELLE, HUSBAND AND WIFE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 9, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS, DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE WEST 375 FEET. SUBJECT TO: 1. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF DECLARATON OF COVENANT: RECORDED: MARCH 1, 1989 RECORDING NO.: 8903010640 2. RESTRICTIONS, CONDITIONS, DEDICATIONS, NOTES, EASEMENTS AND PROVISIONS DELINEATED AND/OR DESCRIBED ON THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS AT PAGE(S) 47 IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 3. GENERAL TAXES, WHICH AMOUNT CANNOT BE PAID UNTIL FEBRUARY 15, 2008. YEAR: 2008 AMOUNT: $1,759.98 LEVY CODE: 4250 TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 619660-0540-05 ASSESSED VALUATION: LAND: $171,000.00 IMPROVEMENTS: $0.00 Guarantee No: SG-2631-12237 SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE 4. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: EDWARD CHARLES WILSON AND NHAN PHI TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: 5. JUDGMENT. IN FAVOR OF: AGAINST: AMOUNT: FILED: JUDGMENT NO.: CAUSE NO.: CREDITOR'S ATTORNEY: Guarantee No: SG-2631-12237 BUSSELLE, HUSBAND AND WIFE PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON THOMAS AND TIFFANY TRAN, HUSBAND AND WIFE $100,000.00 APRIL 26, 2004 APRIL 29, 2004 20040429002080 DISCOVER BANK NHAN P. BUSSELLE AND ED WILSON $7,464.69, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST, COSTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES, IF ANY JULY 15, 2005 05-9-20379-5 05-2-08284-4 PATRICK JAMES LYMAN AND KRISTAL. WHITE f SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE The Company's liability for this report is limited to the compensation received. This report is based on the Company's property records, and no liability is assumed for items misindexed or not indexed in the public records, or for matters which would be disclosed by an inquiry of parties in possession or by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. This report and the legal description given herein are based upon information supplied by the applicant as to the location and identification of the premises in question, and no liability is assumed for any discrepancies resulting therefrom. This report does not represent either a commitment to insure title, an examination of or opinion as to the sufficiency or effect of the matters shown, or an opinion as ti:> the marketability of title to the subject premises. I certify this is a true accurate reflection of those documents on file at the King County Court House, Seattle, Washington as of the date and time referenced above. Don Peters :dp Guarantee No: SG-2631-12237 • , ORDER NO. _ .. :?,.Q_~J~ ~11.2. ... ___ _ Section-----···· Township......... _ Range _______ _ Short Plat Rec. No ... __ ... -···---····--- ~title Volume_. /,f .t; ___ Page .. 'j~ ' I ,. I i,ii" '., 13 i.•~ At 1 0486 lUU/ . r 1.IJ At ' 0480 "!: ;;,, ,r XCLL/.. sui,01~8 V ,01 tUI JO fl. RO. [SMl ' ------------1----------· --- I ' I ' 12 7 I OJHI 02<0 ' '" ,"ii: • •' 1001 \ ' I Q21I . • = "' B .. .:.1 ... ,"i!\ ,, 1'1ltl ' 0221 I '" ' I ,o . .,:. a·"~'' ' n~ I __ __," " "' " JO JO ..... . i~ •. ~ ··t'" ; -\' ·uml r, e .. °'" VO\., 73-6 .. J IH7. ·-:: : ! .. ' = lHDD/ llS'21 111~01 0041 " mnJ 1.00 At 0481 .. " ... ~\ ... '" ID~ 15/ 0542 " 382040 ~ = ~ 1,~ t .Z-' Lot ·1· ... •• 1 ... ....• " ,,• ,;;.">I ....... ,t• ,um/ 0543 " IJI.H '·" : .. ~ ~ .. ")~'\Ill ,;,~ ... '4 ... .,,,, J. Kl:N~ ED'V .o~w ttm/ 0020 lOSU/ 0040 I,-~ ·,~)HI [ 0030 m.1~ ,u ... .. ,, . --·-·· . .. 1arnl ~ • .... - I ll!O/ """ .. .. ~:; ;~ "' L .. .. .. • ..,.::,."I,' ,., ' WO/ - ' " " '"· a 1 "' . LOT ' " . ' " . . KC This sketch is provided without charge for 1uu, information. ll is not intended to show all me.tters related tc• the pwµerty including, but not limited to area, dimensions, easements, encroachments or location of boundaries. It is not a pa11 of, nor does it modify, the ,:ummitment or policy to which it is attached. The company assumes NO UA.Bll.!T'Y fot any matter relatr.d to this sketch Reference shoui..'. be made to an accurate survey for furthet informati0n. Web date: 06/28/2007 ti KlngCounty AFFIDAVIT CONCERNING CRITICAL AREAS COMPLIANCE Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) File Number: Application Name: '\.."\/\LC,,OtJ/TtAI-J 6~ <..CIT <;1-\0it.T f'l,Ai" Project Location: 1-JE. ~\J6'-oF ll&TI-\ AYE 4t ,t se9" J8C>T'1 <;-r~r ~c,,.) '-.:>J A The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says: 1. That the affiant is competent to be a witness herein; 2. That the affiant is the applicant for the above project; 3. That to the best of the affiant's knowledge the critical areas on the development proposal site have not been illegally altered; and 4. That the affiant has not previously been found to be in violation of critical areas regulations for any property in King County, or alternatively, that if there have been any violations, such violations have been/are being resolved to the satisfaction of King County. F.:,IU::t., ~}I.. "Tlt.Alu Bntrz d#tll/V1 c~--.2 -;2-b-o e ~ w 4- Applicant signature Date and Place (City and State) I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Check out the DDES Web site at www.kingcounty.gov/permits AffidavitCrlticalAreasComplianceFORM.doc lc-aff-sacomp.pdf 06/28/2007 Page 1 of 1 ti Klng·County Department of Development nnd Environmental Servleea 900 oa~esdele A.va.l'lut: Soutt,west Renton, w .. hingto11 980S1-SU2 206•296•6600 TIY 208·296•7'-17 Wob doto: 08/1412DD7 WAIVER REQUEST FOR REQUIREIJJ PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE (R"qulred prior to fillng a La"d Use Application) _ For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. -----------------------------. - Pre-Ap.plication Waiver Request -Land Use Permit The Director or designee may waive the requirement for a pre..application conference If It Is d.etermlned to be. unnecessary for review of an application. PLEASE PRINT ALL INFORMATION BELOW. Date 1.. 1.02, King County Activity Number A01\='Fo1.e Permit Type ~ -r $1.1i,. 01 v ro; ror,J -e 1-0 r; Project Name '\.V 11~~ot-J /Tru,..i,J ~ Me,t.:=:r:.....::PLA...::...:,.::T' _________ _ Site Address _6>,.;;vc..:.M_-_N_Jt'_) ________________ _ Parcel Number( s) __,,Co::..:...l ~=""""'-'O;:;.._· ="-',;..::1..0:::__,f......,,C..,.,1_"">:c.'-..;.'-=Oc..-_;0_;~_4.:..o;:._ ______ _ PM-It.,(, JP ~ IT"t.S Applicant's Name et> wrr..c;.o&.; /~1Z-1;1Jt:>A 7tt.,,.1,J c./0 Pl& ~-re1t.:ep:.1'!>~ • ~~') Applicant's Phone Applicant's Mailing Address n "~~ l2.C>"I'\.\ />.VE, Applicant's Rationale for Waiver: Based on the rationale noted above, I agree to waive the required p~applicath>n conference, which has been determined to be unnecessary for filing an applica io Dalo- Check out the DDES Web site.at www.ktnqqquntv.aovtparmits LondUM-P~·A.DeonfereneeWtvverReciFORM.Cloo K.C. D.D.E.S. tQ Klng·County Department of Development and En11lronmc!l1tal Services 900 OeKesdele Avanue S01Jtt1wett Ronton. WHhlngto11 i8057-5'-12 206•2116-6600 TTY 208·296•7'-17 Wob dot&: 08/1'12007 WAIVER REQUEST FOR REQUIRE!)] PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE (R"qulr-ed prior to filing a Land Use Application) _ For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. -----------------------------. - Pre-Ap.plication Waiver Request -Land Use Permit The Director or designee may waive the requirement for a pre-application conference If It Is d.etermlned to be. unnecessary for review of an appHcatlon. PLEASE PRINT ALL INFORMATION BELOW. Date "l... 1.0! Permit Type Project Name Site Address King County Activity Number Ao1F'Fote Applicant's Mailing Address n "~~ L2PTl-l 1,.ve. Se fZ::"'-'pJ ,'-VA ~60-;e, ) ; Applicant's Rationale for Waiver: -, ' . \ I "I . '.~c!/1/ , ,,;., /1 I . . ' fl Based on the rationale noted above, I agree to waive the required p~applicath>n conference, which has been determined to be unnecessary for filing an applica io Date. Check out the DDES Web site.at www.ktnqqqu11tv.ac>v!permjts l.•ndtJi:e-PrWl·Ar>ConlerenccWalve,R1JQFORM.doc lc-wa'l•DfOflC,pClf 08114/2007 PDO! 1 off : ~g@g~W~[Qj FEB 2 9 2008 K.C. D.D.E.S. l'1 KlngCounty Department of Development and En1rlronmentlll Servleu 900 Oal<esdele A.va:nua Soutt,west Renton, WHhlngton 98057-5~12 20&-2se-eeoo m 20&-296-1211 W~b d*; 08/1~/i007 WAIVER REQUEST FOR REQUIREDJ· PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE: (R~qulr<id prior to fillng a Land Use Application] _ For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. -----------------------------. - Pre-Ap.plic:ation Waiver Request -Land Use Permit The Director or designee may waive the ri':Jquirement for a pre-application conference If It Is d.etermlned to be. unnecessary for review of an application. PLEASE PRINT ALL INFORMATION BELOW. Date "l.. 1.02, King County Activity Number Ao1f-'Fote Permit Type Project Name Site Address (vAt.,.NJr) Applicant's Mailing Address . n "~~ L2.CT\.\ AVE, $1:': g..ew..,ro,J ,'-VA ; j Applicant's Rationale for Waiver: ;,/ ,I ,<:"\ /' 1: ~ /," :.".:' _;, Based on the rationale noted above, I agree to waive the required p~applicath>n conference, which has been determined to be unnecessary for flllng an applica lo Dato. Chook out the DDES Web site.at www.1c1nacou11tv.aovtoormits L.(lt\dlJ,e-PNJ·A.DConre,enei!WalverReciFORM.doc Pegie 1 or 1 ~~©~~W~[g) FEB 2 9 2008 K.C. D.D.E.S. t'1 Klng·County Department or Development ond Environmnntlll Servlee, 900 Oall;esdele Avanue So1Jtt'lwust !\en1:1>n, wa1hlngt011 98051-5'-12 206•2116•6600 TTY 206-296•1217 WC\b diU; OD/1~/iD07 WAIVER REQUEST FOR REQUIRED] PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE: (Rl!'qulred prior to fillng a Land Use Application) For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. -----------------------------. - Pre-Ap.plication Waiver Request -Land Use Permit The Director or designee may waive the requirement for a pre.-application conference If It Is d.etermined to be unnecessary for review of an application. PLEASE PRINT ALL INFORMATION BELOW. Date ?... 1.02' King County Activity Number .A01f-'Fote PermitType ~HD!,-1" $,~t:,01v1,;1or,..1 -e r..or-; Project Name \.V r t...'i.OpJ /Ttu,..r,,J $ Me,t.:=:r~PLA;=-;:.:.:r _________ _ Site Address ....>.:Cv:.:.~...;..;;.. __ 1 ________________ _ Paree I Number( s) __,,a,,:..:..l ~..:-c.::G.,,,,e..,,,_O=-·....:O::....:..'>.='l..O:::;___,if__,,C."-'1_°>;...'-....='-~C>=-·-0=--~.:.4...:....::0:.....,,.,..,.......,=-..,..,.,=-= PM-11...L IP K' IT't.S Applicant's Name e:t> w11.,..~o~ /~tz-C;"-'CA 71t.,<.t-J t:./0 Pf& !iiH"re"'-:PJt.l'!'J~-• ~CM"l Applicant's Phone Applicant's Mailing Address n "~~ l2.C>"I"\.\ Ave. Si: ,z.g...,roi:J, ,v,A > Applicant's Rationale for Waiver: . '0'1;····/1 Based on the rationale noted above, I agree to waive the required pre,.applicathm conference, which has been determined to be unnecessa.ry for filing an applica lo Date. Check out the DDES Web site.at www.l!l1Jqqou11tv.a2vtoermits L,$NU$e-P~·ADConrereneeWolverReciFORM.cloo lc-wal-ore.ic.par 00/14/2007 Pr,Dt 1 or 1 K.C. D.D.E.S. ., ' S&EE,INC. Geotechnical Consultants REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED WILSON SOUTH PLAT RENTON, WASHINGTON S&EE JOB NO. 803 FEBRUARY 21, 2008 ,, j -_'\ J '/ ',\ I . ' • . . , . fm@©@OW@~ FEB 2 9 20C8 LIJ K.C. D.D.E.S. S&EE SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. 16625 Redmond Way, Suite M 124, Redmond, Washington 98052. (425) 868-5868 FAX (425) 868-7427 Ms. Nhan Busselle 12029 1761h Ave SE Renton, WA 98058 DearNhan: February 21, 2008 Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Wilson South Plat Renton, Washington We are pleased to present herewith our Report ofGeotechnical Investigation for the referenced project. Our services were authorized by you on February 14, 2008, and have been provided in accordance with our proposal dated February 8, 2008. We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services. Should you have any question regarding the contents of this report or require additional information, please call. , exPIRES: NOi/• 2 co cf"'] CC: Mr. Phil Kitzes (3) Mr. Steve Lee (I) 803rp! Very truly yours, SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. 2-2/-oJ- . C. J. Shin, Ph.D., P.E. President S&EE TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... I 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ....................................................................................................................................... I 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................................................ 2 3.1 SURF ACE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................................. 2 3.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ........................................... , ............................................................................. 2 3.3 COAL MINE AND EROSION HAZARDS ............................................................................................. , ......... 3 3.4 TEST PIT FINDINGS ........................................................................................................................................ 3 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................. 4 4.1 GENERAL ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 4.2 SITE PREPARATION AND STRUCTURAL FILL .......................................................................................... 4 4.3 FOUNDATION SUPPORT ............................................................................................................................... 5 4.4 SLAB SUPPORT ............................................................................................................................................... 6 4.5 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES ..................................................................................................................... 6 4.6 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EXCAVATIONS .................................................................................... 8 4.7 ·sEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 9 4.8 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT .................................................................................................................................. 9 4.10 ADDITIONAL SERVICES ........................................................................................................................... 10 FIGURE I: SITE LOCATION MAP FIGURE 2: SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN FIGURE 3: SURCHARGE LOAD ON SUBSURFACE WALLS APPENDIX A: FIELD EXPLORATION LOGS AND KEY 803rpt S&EE REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED WILSON SOUTH PLAT RENTON,WA for Ms. Nhan Busselle 1.0 INTRODUCTION We present in this report the results of our geotechnical investigation for the proposed development. The site is located at the intersection of SE 1801h Street and 120'h Avenue SE, in Renton, Washington. A site location map is shown in Figure 1 and, a site and exploration plan is shown in Figure 2, both are included at the end of this report. We understand that the proposed development will involve 8 single-family lots, new access roads, and a stonn water detention pond. The grading plan is not available at the time of this report. However, we anticipate that the maximum cut and fill will be less than 3 to 6 feet. For the purpose of this study, we have assumed that the structural load of future houses will be typical of residential homes. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of our geotechnical investigation is to develop geotechnical recommendations regarding site preparation and foundation support. Specifically, our services included: 1. Review of available geologic infonnation for the site and its vicinity. 2. Exploration of soil and groundwater conditions underlying the site through the excavation of 5 test pits. 3. Recommendations regarding type of foundation support. Our recommendations include allowable soil-bearing pressure and the total and differential settlements. 4. Recommendations regarding active and at-rest earth pressures to be used for the design of any retaining structures. 5. Recommendations regarding passive soil resistance and coefficient of friction for the resistance of lateral loads. 803rpt S&EE 6. Recommendations regarding temporary and permanent slopes. 7. Recommendations regarding support for slab-on-grade. 8. Recommendations regarding type of soil for seismic design. 9. Recommendations regarding pavement design. I 0. Recommendations regarding site preparation, including removal of unsuitable soils, suitability of onsite soils for use as fill, fill placement techniques, and compaction criteria. 11. Five copies of a written geotechnical report containing a site plan, test pit logs, a description of subsurface conditions, and our findings and recommendations. 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS 3.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS The property is located in a residential area. Wetlands occupy the northwestern portion of the site and power lines run through the eastern portion of the site. Lots I and 2 of the new subdivision will be accessed from 11911> Avenue SE at the west end of the property. The rest of the new lots will be accessed from SE 18011> Street at the south side of the property. At the time of this report, the area of Lots I and 2 is covered with dense tress. The area of the rest of the new lots is clear and currently used for parking and storage. Existing site grade is relatively flat. In the area of Lots I and 2, site grade descends eastward gently at about 12 percent with an elevation relief of about 16 feet. In the area of the rest of the lot, site grade descends eastward at about IO percent with an elevation relief of about 14 feet. No steep slopes are present onsite or near the site boundaries. 3.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Published geologic information (Geologic Map of The Renton Quadrangle, King County, Washington by D.R Mullineaux, 1965) indicates that the site area is underlain by Ground Moraine Deposits (Qgt). The materials include thin ablation till over lodgment till, deposited by Puget glacial lobe. Lodgment till consists of compact, coherent, mixture of sand, silt, clay and gravel, commonly termed hardpan. Ablation till is similar but much less compact and coherent. 80Jl]lt 2 S&EE 3.3 COAL MINE AND EROSION HAZARDS Published Sensitive Areas Map, King County, Washington indicates that the nearest coal mine hazard areas are about one mile to the east and 1/2 mile to the north of the site. The map indicates no erosion hazard onsite. 3.4 TEST PIT FINDINGS Our test pits reveal the site surface is covered by about 0.5 to one foot of topsoil. The soils under the topsoil include about 1.5 to 3 feet thick of loose to medium dense silty sand or sand. This surficial layer is underlain by dense to very dense, slightly cemented, silty sand with various amount of gravel (glacial till). At TP-3 and TP-4 locations, about 5 feet of sand was encountered between the surficial soil and till. Seepage of groundwater was encountered at TP-3 and TP-4. The seepage zone range from 2.5 to 6.5 feet in depths and the seepage rate is low. We believe that the groundwater is perched on the relatively impermeable till. It is our experience that the depth of the perched groundwater will vary with seasons and precipitations. ,. 8031])1 3 S&EE I 1 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 GENERAL It is our opinion that the proposed subdivision is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. Our explorations indicate that the site area is underlain by competent glacial soils. The materials have high shear strength, low compressibility and adequate bearing capacity for conventional spread footings. To avoid excessive foundation settlement, the footings must be founded on at least medium dense native soils. Details of our recommendations are presented in the following sections. 4.2 SITE PREPARATION AND STRUCTURAL FILL · Site preparation should begin with stripping vegetation and topsoil of the structural areas including roads, driveways, buildings and slabs. The subgrades should then be thoroughly proof-rolled using heavy construction equipment. Areas which are found to be loose or soft, or which contain organic soils should be over-excavated. A qualified geotechnical engineer should conduct the proof-rolling and to assist in evaluating the over-excavation requirements. After stripping, over-excavation and excavation to the design grade, the top 12 inches of the native soils should be re-compacted to at least 92% of their maximum dry density as determined using ASTM D-1557 test procedures (Modified Proctor test). Structural fill can then be placed in the over-excavation and fill areas. The structural fill materials should meet both the material and compaction requirements presented below. 80Jrpt Material Requirements: Structural fill should be free of organic and frozen materials and should consist of hard durable particles, such as sand, gravel, or quarry-processed stone. The on-site native soils are suitable for use as structural fill. However, most of these soils are silty and thus moisture sensitive. As such, they should be moisture-conditioned to within± 2% of their optimum moisture content prior to use. Due to their silty nature, the materials would be difficult to use in the wet winter months. Suitable imported structural fill materials include silty sand, sand, mixture of sand and gravel (pitrun), and crushed rock. Placement and Compaction Requirements: Structural fill should be placed in loose horizontal lifts not exceeding a thickness of 6 to 12 inches, depending on the material type, compaction equipment, and number of passes made by the equipment. Structural fill should be compacted to at least 95% 4 S&EE l i ' of the maximum dry density as determined using the ASTM D-1557 test procedures. 4.3 FOUNDATION SUPPORT We recommend that future houses be supported by conventional spread footings which should be founded on at least medium dense native soils or structural fill. Recommendations for footing design and construction are presented below. Allowable Bearing Loads: Footings may be designed using an allowable bearing load of2,000 psf (pounds per square feet). This value includes a safety factor of at least 3, and can be increased by one- third for wind and seismic loads. Settlement: Interior column footings designed in accordance with the above recommendations are expected to experience approximately 1/2 inch of total settlement. Continuous wall footings should experience settlement of about 1/4 to 1/2 inch. Differential settlement between adjacent footings is expected to be about 1/4 inch. The settlement will occur rapidly, essentially as the loads are applied. Lateral Resistance: Lateral resistance can be obtained from the passive earth pressure against the footing sides and the friction at the contact of the footing bottom and bearing materials. The former can be obtained using an equivalent fluid density of200 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), and the latter using a coefficient of friction of0.5. These values include a safety factor of 1.5. Footing Construction: Prior to concrete pour, footing subgrade should be cleaned of loose soil cuttings. All footing subgrade should be observed by a qualified geotechnical engineer prior to the placement of rebar and concrete. The engineer should confirm the bearing capacity of the subgrade material and provided recommendation for subgrade preparation, if necessary. If our test pits coincide with the future footing locations, the upper 4 feet of the backfill in the test pits should be removed and then backfilled with structural fill. All exterior footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the adjacent finished grade to provide protection against frost action, and should be at least 18 inches in width to facilitate construction. 803rpt 5 S&EE i ! l .i 4.4 SLAB SUPPORT Assuming that the site is prepared per recommendations presented in Section ·4.2, all slabs can be soil- supported. We envision that the slab subgrade will be disturbed and loosened by construction activities at the time of slab construction. We therefore recommend that the slab subgrade be proof-rolled. Any wet and loose areas should be over-excavated and backfilled with structural fill. In order to promote uniform support and provide a capillary break, we recommend that slabs be underlain by a 6 mil. vapor barrier over a 4-inch thick layer of free draining gravel. 4.5 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES Lateral earth pressures on retaining walls or permanent subsurface walls, and resistance to lateral loads may be estimated using the following recommended soil parameters: . .. ' Eqiilvaleitt,Fl~!d Unit Weight (PCF) Coefficient of '•: Friciion Active· .. .. At-rest · Passive Native Soils or 30 50 300 0.5 Structural Fill Note: Hydrostatic pressures are not included in the above lateral earth pressures. The active case applies to walls that are permitted to rotate or translate away from the retained soil by approximately 0.002H, where H is the height of the wall. This would be appropriate for a cantilever retaining wall. The at-rest case applies to unyielding walls, and would be appropriate for walls that are structurally restrained from lateral deflection such as basement walls, utility trenches and pits. SURCHARGE INDUCED LATERAL LOADS I) Additional lateral earth pressures will result from surcharge loads from floor slabs or pavements for parking that are located immediately adjacent to the walls. The surcharge-induced lateral earth 80Jrpt 6 S&EE pressures are unifonn over the depth of the wall. Surcharge-induced lateral pressures for the "active" case may be calculated by multiplying the applied vertical pressure (in pst) by the active earth pressure coefficient (Ka). The value of Ka may be taken as 0.3. The surcharge-induced lateral pressures for the "at-rest" case are similarly calculated using an at-rest earth pressure coefficient (Ko) of0.5. For surcharge loads that are not adjacent to the wall, the induced lateral earth pressure will depend on the magnitude of the surcharge and the distance from the wall. Such induced lateral load can be estimated using the equations shown on Figure 3. 2) Slope-induced lateral earth pressures can be accounted for by increasing the effective height of the wall by one-half the slope height. For back slope continues beyond a horizontal distance equal to the height of the wall, only the part of slope-rise within this horizontal distance should be considered. 3) The traffic-induced lateral earth pressure can be accounted for by increasing the effective wall height by 2 feet. SEISMIC INDUCED LATERAL LOADS For seismic induced lateral loads, the dynamic force can be assumed to act at 0.6 H above the wall base and the magnitude can be calculated using the following equation: Pe Where Pe 'Y H a = 3/8*y*H2*a = seismic-induced lateral load = soil density= 130 pcf = wall height horizontal acceleration BACKFILL IN FRONT OF RETAINING WALLS Backfill in front of the wall should be structural fill. The material and compaction requirements are presented in Section 4.2 of this report. The density of the structural fill can be assumed to be 130 pounds per cubic feet. 803rpt 7 S&EE BACKFILL BEHIND RETAINING WALLS Backfill behind the wall should be free-draining materials which are typically granular soils containing less than 5 percent fines (silt and clay particles) and no particles greater than 4 inches in diameter. The backfill material should be placed in 6 to 8-inch thick horizontal lifts and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum density in accordance with ASTM D-1557 test procedures. In the areas where the fill will support pavement, sidewalk or slabs, the top two feet of the backfill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum density. Care must be taken when compacting backfill adjacent to retaining walls, to avoid creating excessive pressure on the wall. DRAINAGE BEHIND RETAINING WALLS Rigid, perforated drainpipes should be installed behind retaining walls. Drainpipes should be at least 4 inches in diameter, covered by a layer of uniform size drain gravel ofat least 12 inches in thickness, and be connected to a suitable discharge location. An adequate number of cleanouts should be installed along the drain line for future maintenance. 4.6 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EXCAVATIONS When temporary excavations are required during construction, the contractor should follow the published safety regulations and be responsible for the safety of their personnel and equipment. The followings cut angles are provided as a general reference. The contractor shall flatten the cut slopes or install shoring if found necessary. For temporary excavations less than 3 feet in depth, the cut bank may be excavated vertically. For temporary excavations less than IO feet in depth, the cut may be sloped at I H: IV. Cuts in dense glacial till (hardpan) may be l/2H:IV. All permanent slopes should be no steeper than 2H: IV. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any slope. Also, all permanent slopes should be seeded with the appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and maintain the slope stability. 803rpt 8 S&EE 4.7 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS We recommend that site class C as defined in the 2006 IBC be considered for the seismic design. The site is underlain by dense glacial till. As such, the liquefaction potential is negligible. 4.8 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT We recommend that the subgrade for flexible pavement be prepared in accordance with the recommendations presented in Section 4.2 SITE PREPARATION AND STRUCTURAL FILL. Based on the subsoil conditions, we believe that the prepared subgrade will have a California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of at least 12. We recommend the following flexible pavement sections for light and medium traffic conditions: Light traffic (Daily EAL= 5 or less): 2 inches asphaltic concrete over 4 inches base course Medium traffic (Daily EAL= 20 to 80): 3 inches asphaltic concrete over 6 inches base course The base course should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D-1557 test method. The material should meet WSDOT aggregate specification 9-03.9(3) and have the following gradation: 80Jrpt Sieve Size I Y.-inch 5/8-inch 1/4-inch US No. 40 US No. 200 % Fracture Percent Passing 100 50-80 30-50 3-18 9 7.5 max. 75 min. S&EE 4.10 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Additional services may be required during the design and construction of the project. We envision that these additional services may include the following: I. Review of design plans. 2. Provision of construction monitoring services. The tasks of our monitoring service typically include the followings: 2.1 Monitoring of site preparation. 2.2 Monitoring of spread footing subgrade preparation. Our representative will confirm the bearing capacity of the subgrade materials, and will assist the contractor in evaluating the over- excavation requirements, if any. 2.3 Monitoring the placement and compaction of structural fill. Our representative will confirm the suitability of the fill materials, perform field density tests, and assist the contractor in meeting the compaction requirements. 2.4 Monitoring the installation of subsurface drains. Our representative will confirm that these drains are installed in accordance with our.recommendations. 3. Other geotechnical issues deemed necessary. 803rpt 10 S&EE 5.0 CLOSURE The recommendations presented in this report are provided for design purposes and are based on soil conditions disclosed by field observations and subsurface explorations. Subsurface information presented herein does not constitute a direct or implied warranty that the soil conditions between exploration locations can be directly interpolated or extrapolated or that subsurface conditions and soil variations different from those disclosed by the explorations will not be revealed. The recommendations outlined in this report are based on the assumption that the development plan is consistent with the description provided in this report. If the development plan is changed or subsurface conditions different from those disclosed by the exploration are observed during construction, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions, and if necessary, reconsider our design recommendations. 803rpt 11 S&EE S&EE Fig ure I Site Loca ti on Map 0 ~ -m!o.1 -..... . ...... . ' ., ....... "'Ii :""-... ,, . ...... .. ", ' r, .m•0.5~ / 0.2 m•0.7~ j,1-' ~ m =o.3~ :c ~ " C u.0.6 0 L,J 3 ~ 0.8 A ~ ,, ~ ".1 ~ J ,. ·' / I /, , I I J ,1 / .2 .4 .6 VALUE OF crH ( ~) LINE LOAO OL X•mH FOR m i 0.4, a; ( H )· 0.20n Ii H ~ • (0.16+n2)2 PH• 0.550L Z•r_ i-a;---~ FOR m > 0.4, H er. < H >· 1.2em 2 o R H ~ (m2 t-n2)2 I I . 0.64 OL *'~~:!_lRESULTANT PH• (m2 +I) PRESSURES FROM LINE I.DAO OL .8 ( BOUSSINESO EQUATION MODIFIED BY EXPERIMENT) Reference: Foundations and Earth Structure•, Design Manual 7.2, Department of the Navy, May 1982 m R 0.1 .60H 0.3 .60H 0.5 .56H 0.7 .48H 1.0 0 ~ ~ \ -~ ___ ..., ..... f'.m•0.6 ..... ~-. ·, ~, .. 0.2 \ m ,o.z-. i , ~ J ' / ~~•0.4 Of! I / I i/ m ~ R j 0.2 .78 .59H 0.4 .78 .59H / 0.6 .45 .48H o.e 1.00 j .5 VALUE 1.0 H2 1.5 H POINT LOAD Op X•mH OF crH (rpl Op R FOR m!, Q.4, H2 o.28n2 crH('Cp)' (0.16"n2)3 FOR m >Q.4, er. (.t@._), 1.11m2n2 H Op (m2+-n2)3 crH'' UH cos2(1.18) i-r---;-11 SECTION A·A PRESSURES FROM POINT LOAD Op (BOUSSINESO EQUATION MODfFIED BY EXPERIMENT) Calculatlon of Surcharge Loads on Subsurface Walls Figure 3 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION AND LOGS The soil conditions underlying the project site were explored by the excavation of 5 test pits on February 14, 2008. The approximated test pit locations are shown on Figure 2 -Site and Exploration Plan which is included at the end of this report. The test pits were excavated with a Komatsu PC 220 LC trackhoe. A representative from S&EE was present throughout the exploration to log the subsurface soil conditions. All test pits were backfilled with the excavated soils. The backfill were placed in 2-foot thick lifts and compacted with the trackhoe bucket. Test pit logs are presented in this appendix. A chart showing the Unified Soil Classification System is included at the end of this appendix. 803rpl 12 S&EE ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 6 : 1.s: ' ! I I I I Ill SM 111 Ill SM 111 111 Ill SM 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 I l I l I 10, ___ !_ __ 1 ___ :_ __ 1 __ TEST PIT TP-1 Soil Description Dark brown silty fine sand (topsoil) Brown silty fine sand with trace fine gravel (damp)(loose) Gray silty fine to medium sand with fine to medium gravel and trace cobbles (damp)(dense to very dense)(till) -very dense below 6 feet Excavation terminated at a depth of 7 feet. No caving occured during excavation. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Client: Exploration Method: Exploration Dale: Ms. Nhan Busselle Komatsu PC 220 LC February 14, 2008 Figure A-1 S&EE Job No. 803 Proposed Wilson South Plat ' ' ' ' 2.61 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 6 : ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 7.6: ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' Ill SM 111 Ill SM 111 111 111 SM 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 TEST PIT TP-2 So// Description Dark brown silty fine sand (topsoil) Brown and light brown silty fine sand with trace fine gravel (damp)(loose) Gray silty fine to medium sand with fine to medium gravel and trace cobbles (damp)(dense to very dense)(@) -very dense below 6 feet -slightly cemented below 7 feet ' ' ' 10 ---'---I --~ _ -I ___ 1 Excavation terminated at a depth of 9.5 feet. No caving occured during excavation. Client: Exploration Method: Exploration Date: S&EE .k>b No. 803 No groundwater encountered during excavation. Ms. Nhan Busselle Komatsu PC 220 LC February 14, 2008 Figure A-2 Proposed Wilson South Plat 2.6: 6 7.&: ' 111 111 TEST PIT TP-3 Soil DescripUon Dark brown silty fine sand (topsoil) Brown fine sand with trace silt and fine gravel (damp)(loose) -seepage about 1/50 gpm at 2.5 feet Gray fine to medium sand with trace fine to medium gravel (damp to moist)(medium dense to dense) -seepage about 1/50 gpm at 6.5 feet Gray silty fine to medium sand with fine to medium gravel and trace cobbles (damp)(dense to very dense)(till) 10 : __ -~ __ --_'_ --I --_1 Excavation terminated at a depth of 9.5 feet. No caving occured during excavation. Client: Exploration Method: Exploration Date: S&EE Job No. 803 Ms. Nhan Busselle Komatsu PC 220 LC February 14, 2008 Figure A-3 Proposed Wilson South Plat 2.6: ' 6 7.5: 111 111 111 111 111 TEST PIT TP-4 Soil Descripllon SM Dark brown silty fine sand (topsoil) SM Brown and gray silty fine sand with trace fine gravel (damp)(loose to medium dense} -medium dense below 2 feet Gray fine to medium sand with trace fine to medium gravel (damp to moist}(medium dense to dense} -seepage about 1/20 gpm at 5 feet Gray silty fine to medium sand with fine to medium gravel and trace cobbles (damp}(dense to very dense}(till} 10:______ I Client: Exploration Method: Exploration Date: S&EE Job No 8a3 Excavation terminated at a depth of 1 O feet. No caving occured during excavation. Ms. Nhan Busselle Komatsu PC 220 LC February 14, 2008 Figure A-4 Proposed Wilson South Plat r ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 2.6• 6 7.&: Ill SM 111 SM 111 111 111 111 111 " ' TEST PIT TP-5 Soll Descriplion Dark brown silty fine sand (topsoil) Brown and gray silty fine sand (damp)(loose) 111 111 SM Gray silty fine to medium sand w~h fine to medium gravel and trace cobbles (damp)(dense to very dense)(till) ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 ' ' , 111 ' ' : : 111 ' ' : I : 111 ' 10 ] _ _ : __ ] __ : __ ~I~ l~I~ Client: Exploration Method: Exploration Date: S&EE Job No. BOO Excavation terminated at a depth of 10 feet. No caving occured during excavation. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Ms. Nhan Busselle Komatsu PC 220 LC Februa,y 14, 2008 Figure A-5 Proposed Wilson South Plat r UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM i § DESCRIPTION GW WELL-GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES, UTILE OR NO FINES GP POORLY-GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES, LITILE OR NO FINES SIL 1Y GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-SILT GM MIXTURES GC CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-CLAY MIXTURES WELL-GRADED SAND OR GRAVELLY SANDS, SW LITTLE OR NO FINES POORLY-GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS, SP LITTLE OR NO FINES SIL 1Y SANDS, SAND-SILT MIXTURES SC CLAYEY SANDS, SAND-CLAY MIXTURES INORGANIC SILTS, VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SIL 1Y OR ML CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICllY INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICllY, GRAVELLY CL CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SIL 1Y CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS OL ORGANIC SIL TS AND ORGANIC SILT-CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICllY MH INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SANDY OR SIL 1Y SOILS, ELASTIC SIL TS INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICllY, FAT CH CLAYS ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICllY, OH ORGANIC SIL TS PT PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS ¥ DEPTH OF GROUNDWATER DURING EXCAVATION S&EE MAJOR DIVISIONS CLEAN GRAVELS u.~... * oi!i m UJ (UTTtEOR ~ i5~~ i ..J NO FINES) 0 !!~ GRAVELS ·~ ~~i!c~ ii ~ ~~ 0:: >-1:jffi •• WITH FINES C) w~c,DI :t. w I!! ~g!li ii z ~8 (APPRECIABLE ~ ~ ,!~ ~ l';~ AMOUNT OF ANES) CLEAN ~~ C, ii l';!h ~! w ii SANDS ~~ ~ZO ! UJ "' ~Oz 0:: Ill Ill (LITTLE OR en ~5:,~ !j II NO ANES) < o« Q ~,(I UJ 0 ~:5 SANDS ~ Fe::;:~ I' (J !I~ UJ ~~~m I WITH FINES Osi « !o (APPRECIABLE 2: II) 12 iii'" o!!l AMOUNT OF FINES) !li"' 0 !! ~ !!~ :::i ~~ SIL TS & CLAYS 0 ,I~ :, "' UQUIO LIMIT LESS THAN 50 UJ ~ s~ NI;; 0 :ig g~ W ~N Z Oci ~ii! -~z ~ ~~ e> ~i!c SILTS & CLAYS • le"' ~ !i!~ UOU10 LIMIT GREATER THAN 50 U:: ~ ii! HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS I _] SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART AND KEY TO TEST PIT LOG w KlngCounty Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 rrv 206-296·7217 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) File Number: Web date: 06/28/2007 AFFIDAVIT CONCERNING CRITICAL AREAS COMPLIANCE For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. I/ , ,; ';/,/';, e ; I, ,rK .. c. D.D.E.S. 1. ,/' I.' ,, 'f I i 'Z-,;, " )Ir;, jl . ,~, ,,' ,:- Application Name: \.'\/IL SOtJ /:IJY'r.tv 8 · LOT SHo~T FLAT" Project Location: t,...IE c..ot.t-JSlt.. o1= I I frrl-l A\/6 Se J. <:.6 I fsOT~ <;,rttt-r, ~a.:>,,vA The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says: 1. That the affiant is competent to be a witness herein; 2. That the affiant is the applicant for the above project; 3. That to the best of the affiant's knowledge the critical areas on the development proposal site have not been illegally altered; and 4. That the affiant has not previously been found to be in violation of critical areas regulations for any property in King County, or alternatively, that if there have been any violations, such violations have been/are being resolved to the satisfaction of King County. El:> -w 11... So "-J/ 1.JA ~ 10 f3t.J":,Sl::."1..Ll5 ~n~4reaJie/i<l ~ Date and Place (City and State) I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Check out the DDES Web site at www.kinqcounty.gov/permits AffldavltCrltlcalAreasComplianceFORM.doc lc-aff-sacomp.pdf 06/28/2007 Page 1 of 1 r , Jtmsllounq !load 9enl.aa Dmmm, . __ ., __ llOl __ _ Saot11o, WA 11810. ...... TYPE OF CERTIFICATE 181 ORIGINAL 0CONDmONAL March 23, 2007 Cefllflcate # 03072 . FIie Number: OT.OS-19-03 res: Man:h 2008 CERTIFICATE OF TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY 0 Specific conditions are dcscribcd on the reverse side of this certificate. Punruant to King County Code, Chapter 14. 70 es amended, this certlftc:ate confirms that the level of service 11111ndard used in the Transportation Concumncy Management program bas been sali$ficd. IMPOKl'ANT: This certificate does not guamntee a development pennit. Othez transportation Improvements and mitigation will be required to comply with ln&asccllon Standanls, Miligatioo Payment System, King Co,mty road slandards, and/or safety needs. 1. ApplicaotNamcandAddn:ss: Richard Proctor 23818 1001h Ave. SE #Q, Kent, WA 98031 2.. Property Loc:alion:. a. Property Address: SE 180th St. b. Development Name: c. Pmcel Number: 8198800840 3. 1ypo ofDevelopmcntPennitTo Be Rcqueslr:d: Short Plat 4. Proposed Land Use: Slngle Family Residential S. Zone Location and Reserved Units: a. Concw1em,'Y Zone: 798 CommUD!ty Plannm&An:a: Soos Creek I. Commcn:ia1 ~cct-Total Square Feet:' 0 ii. Mu1ti-lllmily-Nmnbcr of Units: 0 ill. Singlcmmily-NmnberofUnits: 6 6. This Ccrtificale is subject to the following general conditions: a. This Certificate of Concurralcy runs with the. land and Is transferable only to subsequeat owners of the same property for the slated development, subject to the tmms, conditions and expimtion date listed herein. This Ccrtificate of Concurralcy is not tnmsfemble to any other.property and hes no conunacial value. This Certtllcate Expires: March 23, 2008 unless you apply for the development pcnnit described above, prior to that date. If this n:quirancnt is not met the King County Department of Transportation reserves the option to cancel your certificate and capacity n,servation. When :,oa apply for a development permit with Klag Coaaty's Departmeat orDemopment and Emiroamenllll Scnlces (DDES), bring llds CertUleale ofTnmportallon CliDalnmq as part or Ille.development appllcalloa padia&e. If yoa bmo any questions, pkase can (206) 263-4759. DcpaxbuUII ofTumspu1111tion King County, Wasbingfon FEB 2 9 2008 K.C. D.D.E.S. m'l)e Seattle <!rimes ~ REPRESENTINO THE .ieattlet)Joot-lntelligencer K C /DEV & ENVIRON ATTN CAROL WOOD 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW RENTON, WA 98055 Re: Advertiser Account #78871004 Ad #: 763826000 3893530 / 3 STATE OF WASHINGTON Counties of King and Snohomish PO Box 70, Seattle, WA 98111 Affidavit of Publication The undersigned, on oath states that he/she is an authorized representative of The Seattle Times Company, publisher of The Seattle Times and representing the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, separate newspapers of general circulation published daily in King and Snohomish Counties, State of Washington. The Seattle Times and the Seattle Post-Intelligencer have been approved as legal newspapers by orders of the Superior Court of King and Snohomish Counties. The notice, in the exact form annexed, was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper or papers and distributed to its subscribers during all of the said period. I Newspaper The Seattle Times 04/02/08 "Age).)! Marilyn P.;r~dn Signature 'Yl(/ ~· -~~ ,,,, ,c o''-- ,,, ~ <'· (/ -- /~~···s10N .. i~~ ffl iJ 111 (t /.»"' i51:>ed and sworn to before me on ----b"''l'V"'-M,,"-"'-{."---___,_/-'O+, ... ,x.>.eu:c()ec....L1_ ~ ::,,:~_,o,ARY ~··.z, (DT ) , ,ci;,o.,.. : " ~ -:1' <.> ---·-• " 1,/lU ~ \ PU i£f.. IGNATURE) ~ ..,,~···.':?-2ca·0/ <:, 1111 --1 '• ,•~I '"'--l's 'oF· .. :::~s~,i --.. ,,, ,.,.,i'.,/,1///1 and for the State of Washington, residing at Seattle <[t,Je Seattle m'tmes ~i§¥> REPRESENTING THE .Seattlet1Joot-.31ntdligen!'.tt Re Advertiser Account #78871004 Ad TEXT·KING COUNTY DEPT. OF 0 DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DOES) 900 Oakesdale Ava SW, Renton, WA 98057·5212 NOTICE OF LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUEST: SHORT Plat Flle:LOBS0021 Applicant: Edward Wllaon and Brenda Tran Location: NW comer of SE 180th St and 120th Ave SE , Poat al City Renton Proposal: Subdivide 2.57 acres Into 8 realdentlal Iota Project Planner: Shannon Dorr, 206·296-6873 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DOES wlll laaue a decision on thla appllcallon following a 21- day comment period ending on May 2, 2008. Written comments and addltlonal Information can be obtained by contacting the planner at the phone number listed above. Ad # 763826000 ti KingCounty Department of Development and Envlronmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 nv 206-296-7217 Web 1a,'. 08/14/2007 LAND USE PERMIT APP LI CATION FORM For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Staff Use Only -Do not write in this box ApplicationJ1 (!J § § (()) (()) 2 1 FEB 2 9 2008 K.C. D.D.E.S. .DO NOil' WRITE ABOVE 1:HIS DIVIDER I (We) request the following permit(s) or approval(s): D Binding site plan D Public agency & utility exception D Boundary line adjustment D Reasonable use exception D Building permit D Reuse of public schools D Conditional use permit D Right-of-Way use permit D Critical areas alteration exception D Road variance D Linear D Non-linear D Shoreline conditional use permit D Drainage variance or adjustment D Shoreline exemption D Period review for mining sites D Shoreline redesignation D Plat alteration D Shoreline substantial development D Plat vacation permit D P-suffix amendment D Shoreline variance Date Received (stamp) ... fft D Site development permit D Site-specific comprehensive plan amendment D Special district overlay removal D Special use permit D Subdivision -Formal ~ Subdivision -Short D Temporary use permit D Urban planned development D Zone reclassification D Zoning variance I, BR.et-J~ ~ , being duly sworn, state that I am the owner or officer of the corporation owning property described in the legal description filed with this application and that I have reviewed the rules and regulations of the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) regarding the preparation and filing of this application and that all statements, answers and information submitted with this application are in all respects true, accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. During the review of this application, it may be necessary for DDES staff to make one or more site visits. By signing this application form, you are giving permission for these visits. If it is rental property, the owner hereby agrees to notify tenants of possible site visits. VI , • I ;(/ Printed Name ~ "TLAIJ Signature __..~..c...."""-"'-_:..><,_;....,_.=-'-'_::.-"-'------- Company' ___________________________________ _ Phone ...Of.-4i8-~O'l.. E-mail ---------------------- Ma iii n g Address I£ <I 1, t"!.12 'f\wt ,6) «e fa1L /Z.13-.Jfot-l , '-"A ~8D5:f, · 146~5 c;.c 17&r1-t ~~"" ? c1TY sT z1p If applicable, state below the name, address and telephone number of the authorized applicant for this application as shown on the Certification and Transfer of Application Status form filed with this application. Name Phone -----------. E-mail ---------------------- Mailing Address STREET CITY ST ZIP AppForlandUsePennitsFORM.doc lc-app-luper.pdf 08/14/2007 Page 1 of2 ~ J Web date: 08/14/2007 ti King County LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM Department of Development and Envlronmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206·296-6600 TTY 206-296'7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Staff Use Only -Do not write In this box rmrn@rnowrn@ FEB 2 9 2008 Application }L O § § (0) (0) 2 ]l K.C. D.D.E.S. Date Received (stamp) I (We) request the following permit(s) or approval(s): 0 Binding site plan O Public agency & utility exception O Site development permit 0 Boundary line adjustment O Reasonable use exception O Site-specific comprehensive plan 0 Building permit O Reuse of public schools amendment 0 Conditional use permit O Right-of-Way use permit O Special district overlay removal 0 Critical areas alteration exception O Road variance O Special use permit 0 Linear O Non-linear O Shoreline conditional use permit O Subdivision -Formal 0 Drainage variance or. adjustment O Shoreline exemption N Subdivision -Short 0 Period review for mining sites O Shoreline redesignation O Temporary use permit 0 Plat alteration O Shoreline substantial development O Urban planned development 0 Plat vacation permit O Zone reclassification 0 P-suffix amendment O Shoreline variance O Zoning variance I, EO-.VAgp ~ lt..'='o"-9 ~ IJA"IJ ~al.~ being duly sworn, state that I am the owner or officer of the corporation owning property described in the legal description filed with this application and that I have reviewed the rules and regulations of the Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) regarding the preparation and filing of this application and that all statements, answers and information submitted with this application are in all respects true, accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. During the review of this application, it may be necessary for DDES staff to make one or more site visits. By signing this application form, you are giving permission for these visits. If it is rental property, the owner hereby agrees to notify tenants of possible site visits. IJAf-UJ> ~ 11 nO. / Printed Name E.C>~A1z.:t> w11..S01V • ~u: Signature~~< ~ Company ----------------------------------- Phone 4'+.:; -1.;~-(o008 E-mail ---------------------- Malling Address l::J f>44 1"2.ctrl-1 /..VE. SE · STREET ST ZIP If applicable, state below the name, address and telephone number of the authorized applicant for this application as shown on the Certification and Transfer of Application Status form filed with this application. Name Phone E-mail Mailing Address STREET CrTY ST ZIP AppForlandUsePermltsFORM.doc lc-app-luper.pdf 08/14/2007 Page 1 012 KingCounty Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest ' Web date: 06/2812007 CERTIFICATION OF APPLICANT STATUS Renton, Washington 98057-5212 206-296•6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Permit Number: JG [D § § QJ) (()) 21tlvlty Number: ____ _ Permit Name: FOR INDIVIDUALS: I, E:b ""' ILSOl'-l j Nf-{J91y g u.C.5,El(r (print name), hereby certify that I am the/an owner of the property which is the subject of this permit. If I am not the sole owner of the property, I certify that I am authorized to represent all other owners of the property. My mailing address is: 1,6~ 4 12.0T\-i AVE. SE:. MAIN FJLr::: c copy -OR- FOR CORPORATIONS/BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS: I, (print name), hereby certify that I am an authorized agent of , a corporation or other business association authorized to do business in the State of Washington, which is the sole owner of the property that is the subject of this permit. If this corporation or business association is not the sole owner of the property, I certify that this corporation/business association is authorized to represent all other owners of the property. The mailing address of this corporation/business association is: I further certify that the above named corporation/business association is the "Applicant" for this permit and as such is financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. This corporation/business association shall remain the "Applicant" for the duration of this permit unless it transfers its applicant status in writing on the form provided by DDES. * Signature of Applicant's Agent Date Signed * By signing as the Applicant or the Applicant's Agent, I certify under penalty of perjury under the{im m'.t"8l$1iil1(of117 ""@ Washington that the information provided above is true and correct. ln} ~ L5 U ','_/ L5 Q FEB 2 9 2008 CertApplicantStatusFORM.doc lc-cer-apstat.pdf 06/28/2007 Page 1 of 2 K.C. D.D.E.S. ' NOTICE TO APPLICANTS: By law, this department returns all engineering and other plans to the applicant. If, however, you wish to authorize the department to return engineering and other plans directly to the engineer, architect, or other consultant for the limited purpose of making corrections, please designate below: ._Rl I authorize this department to return plans directly to my consultant(s) for the limited purpose of making corrections as designated on this form. CONSULTANTS: p 1-t I L-L. I f' )( IT-z..,e.S Check out the DDES Web site at www.kinqcounty.gov/permfts CertAppllcantStatusFORM.doc kxer-apstalpdf 06128/2007 Page 2 of 2 I KingCounty Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Web date: 06/28/2007 CERTIFICATION OF APPLICANT STATUS Renton, Washington 98057-5212 206·296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Permit Number: Activity Number: ------------ Permit Name: FOR INDIVIDUALS: I, F->IU:.Nt:>A TlZA)0 (print name), hereby certify that I am the/an owner of the property which is the subject of this permit. If I am not the sole owner of the property, I certify that I am authorized to represent all other owners of the property. My mailing address is: J1> R Ed:-{ D1'r: b,( • r,ZA t:I ' &e:tzcf:vn Wlf: CXRr?>f? p,bP 7 I further certify that I am the "Applicant" for this permit and as such am financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. I shall remain the "Applicant" for the duration of this permit unless I transfer my "applicant" status in writing on the form provided by DOES. P;v,bta~4--r~ /(-b -@ 2 Date Signed * Signature of Applicant -OR- FOR CORPORATIONS/BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS: I, (print name), hereby certify that I am an authorized agent of , a corporation or other· business association authorized to do business in the State of Washington, which is the sole owner of the property that is the subject of this permit. If this corporation or business association is not the sole owner of the property, I certify that this corporation/business association is authorized to represent all other owners of the property. The mailing address of this corporation/business association is: · MAIN FILE Co,:;,, I further certify that the above named corporation/business association is the "Applicant" for this permit and as such is financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. This corporation/business association shall remain the "Applicant" for the duration of this permit unless it transfers its applicant status in writing on the form provided by DOES. * Signature of Applicant's Agent Date Signed * By signing as the Applicant or the Applicant's Agent, I certify under penalty of perjury unckDtle~a@d§h~ &'lit[lifo'. Washington that the information provided above is true and correct. Ln) ~ FEB 2 9 2008 CertApplicantStatus~(Ul § §,91,Q, 2 }2s12001 K.C. D.D.E.S.age1 of\~ I I / NOTICE TO APPLICANTS: By law, this department returns all engineering and other plans to the applicant. If, however, you wish to authorize the department to return engineering and other plans directly to the engineer, architect, or other consultant for the limited purpose of making corrections, please designate below: JQ_ I authorize this department to return plans directly to my consultant(s) for the limited purpose of making corrections as designated on this form. CONSULTANTS: pf+ 11: ... L. I p K I T-Z...C ":, '2.oi:;. z z:7. 7 44S- Check out the DOES Web site at www.klnqcounty.gov/permlts CertAppllcantStatusFORM.doc lc:-cer-apstat.pdf 0612612007 Page2of2 , • ·SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT 14616 S.E. 192nd SL • P.O. Box 58039 • Renton, WA 98058-1039 • Phone (253) 630-9900 • Fax (253) 630-5289 March 29, 2007 Richard Proctor 23816 100th Ave SE #43 Kent WA 98031 Re: Ed Wilson's property (1181h Ave SE to 122•d Ave SE South of Petrovitsky Rd to SE 1801h St) Based on the engineering review done on this property, the following items area noted for water and sewer.service: Sewer: Proposed sewer layout map attached MAIN FILE· Copy Proposed sewer layout subject to the final site development plan (street, storm and grading). Please have the developer provide ACAD and paper plans. Right of way permit required for any work done in SE 180th St and I 18th Ave SE. Onsite sewer easement required Offi,ite.sewer easement maybe required. BP A p~rmit required for any work in the Bonneville Transmission Line Easement area Sewer ~ea charge is currently $1,848.00 per unit or Jot ; Sewer ispecial Connection Charge #47 is currently $60.58 per foot and each stub is $480.00. These costs increase each year do to the 6% Operations, Maintenance and Deprec#ation on the sewer main. Sewer service can be available to this proposed plat via connection to the existing sewer main and manholes (Ex manhole #39-919 and Ex manhole #39-920), located in the north easterly area of the property, on the east boundary line of the Bonneville Transmission Line Easement. IL08§002l wv,.>w.sooscreek..cmn K.C. D.D.E.S. • March 29. 2007 Ed Wilson's property Page2 SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT Extend the sewer main onsite as required to provide gravity sewer service· to each lot and to adjacent upland properties. Additional sewer main may be required (onsite), subject to the proposed plat layout. Extend sewer main in 1181h Ave SE, in accordance with the Soos Creek Water & Sewer District Comprehensive Plan. Extend sewer main in SE 1801h St across the project property frontage. The feasibility of the onsite gravity sewer main construction is subject to design information, data, wetland survey and buffer area information, sensitive area and wetland grading permit requirements, restrictions and District review and approval. Wetland survey and buffer area information will be required to determine the location of the proposed onsite gravity sewer main. The Developer will be eligible for sewer latecomers reimbursement and payment for those properties adjacent to and benefiting from the sewer main extension. Grading permit required for any sewer main construction in the offsite easement area. Water: Proposed water layout map attached. Proposed water layout subject to the final site development plan (street, storm & grading). Please have the developer provide ACAD and paper plans. Right of way permit required for any work in Petrovitsky Rd, 1181h Ave SE, 1201h Ave SE, SE l 7811i St and SE 1801h St. BP A Permit required for any work in Bonneville Transmission Line Easement area. . Onsite water easement required. Offilite water easement may be required. • March 29, 2007 Ed Wilson's property Page3 SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT Water service can-be available to this proposed plat via connection to the existing 12" Ductile Iron water main located north of the project site in Petrovitsky Rd, connection to the existing 8" AC water main located in SE 180th St, and 120th Ave SE, along the southern project property line, the existing 6" AC water main located in 118th Ave SE alontf the western project property line, and the existing 8" DI water main located in SE 178 St, along the eastern project property line. The developer will be required to replace the existing 8" AC water main in SE 180th St, with new 8" DI water main and the existing 6" AC water main in 118th Ave SE if there are any conflicts between the proposed street/storm frontage improvements required for this project and the existing AC water mains. An AC waiver abandonment permit will be required for the abandonment and replacement of the existing 8" AC water main located in SE 180th St with new 8" DI water main and the existing 6" AC water main in 118th Ave SE with new 6" DI water main, if abandonment and replacement is required. Extend water main onsite as required to provide fire protection and water service to each lot. Please have the developer verify with the Fire Marshal concerning fire requirements, fire flow, fire hydrant locations, etc. for the project. Area charge is $2,079.00 per unit or lot. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, ~/(()_.~ ./Gayle A. Andrews Development Coordinator II Encl. 0 I 00 en 0 0 ~ ~. " 0 0 0 m . (/l • l -J c.il . _ __.,,._ ' ·~ .l - I cs:-) .... r • 1rut1 ... ~"-==> ·r -C ) c:::, co IC? ~~ Q7~ w z -d[-•t1i ------ ~ ·~· ---; .... r I ----;;r---, -------' .... . ~-'-~~: __ .. ,· ~ / ME'1l«Xll&4 EXT.""'--.... f'ETltOI/ITSl(Y ROo'D +-..._ ~ . ___ .,_ "'"' ------~r-=·~ -' -----~ Kf. ---~ -~ . fl ' i£lt' Lan I LOU .,;; ·;.-, ~) ~ "l'z_~-~ ... liaC: IDIUI ..,-t I -·-Wl'CJt taGUll • ~ ~i;;.;; I ~ ., .... •. i! ~·l!Xf·""', ; 'r~ I ;·, ::1, Jli.C I -__. ~Q~~ll I .w "'j ~· ~ ""'·""" ~' ,. ~ I ~~:l ."' --..:1:':~ -~i--- ~ wrna,,.. ! • ! . -s., . • ,m---•' EXT N:. ,.. /J# •'· I ~· I 'lt ~JF...in -r.~ -- "'@ I!! LC7'1 --~ •, ,, I() ' • Ji.. ~ .l\. ~ ~ \'I ~ ct) ~ ffi ~w UJ z OIi ..-CW1I" LD'I \. 1 l ,~u _,. .. ....... ... L{) I M N I M C'f) s z .. i\ . 11 ' : .. ! e I IC: 11~ \ i : I ! d j, • : ! I I I '• '} 'i I~ • I ~ ~ ~ ~ €B S-£Z-££ 3N I \.~ _, --. . •;,a I -· T '" -, . . ;,-,,,,,-r I • e -. . i I !:l M'lil l1t ' ·----~-~ ~~--·-- S-£Z·Z£ 3N EB ~ ; ... ~ Fire District Receipt ® KlngCounty Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Renton, WA 98055-1219 Fire District #_--'L\()'"""'--- Name of Project/Proposal "\.'\/ILSoW~.6.tv 8-lor S-Hal.T f'U\.T SE I bOTl-i ST· Location of Project/ Proposal tJE ~\Je~ oF l/8T\.I AVf:. ~€ .ANt> I SoTll <;.:t: <;1:s (Address, parcel number, tax account number, legal description)" *One of these required for processing of application r\11<.J FILI: CQpy TWN '2. ~ "' -------RNG. ';" I: KROLL PAGE _____ _ Address of Applicant ___,_17.,_B...._44"'---'--=~"-=__._l ..,f>"'o'-T.,_\.4--'--5-'-T-'-=lz=i£,=-'-t-,1_.ru;t-J='-"-'TOIJ'-""'"----W=-..:A__,_~':,"-f>('.)"""''-'-~..:::f,c..._ ____ _ Telephone Number 4'2..'>. '2.. ~<r · <.;Oo.e> Description: Type of Project/ Proposal Check appropriate box(es) D Apartment I Multifamily D Duplex D Conditional Use D Commercial/ Industrial ;a'5ubdivision D Unconditional Use D Retail D Short Subdivision / Short Plat D Planned Unit Development D Residential: Single Family Residence D Rezone D School / Classroom DOther (describe) ______________________________ _ 'r/J Storz couplings required on Fire Hydrants Issuance of this receipt does not imply an approval, disapproval nor review of referenced project/ proposal. This receipt shall be valid for 30 days from date of signature. Distribution: White: Applicant (see below) Yellow: King County Building Services Division Pink: Fire District Note Applicant: at the time of application Fire District: mail yellow copy to: King County Building Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Renton, WA 98055-1219 Attn: Fire Engineering [ru @: © @: ~ o/J @: I]) FEB 2 9 2008 to DOES the white copy must be presented with project / proposal submitt1L, 011s(Re, 11m1 l}) § § o o 2 l K.C. D.D.E.S. ;,;: () 0 0 m (/) ~. ,------------------------ C 00 t/l 0 0 ~ rr, co "' c.o ;--.., 8 co !Ill I 11~ .. ,. lh !!I .,. I ' I I ' ' I I ' ------~ ' ' --.--, , I I ' ____ J i ·------i r=::::i - f I 1,51 11 • I f I ' I I 1-,. . ' ,---------r-------- : I I I r---, , r ---, 1 I • I r I •1 I I : I : I I I L __ ..J I I I L---J I I 111111AveSI ----- i ------wi,------- r----, I I I I I I I I L ____ J -------------- I, I II! I I I I I 1! I #Ola~•• I I I s ! !I I --\ .. .. WILSON/TRAN 8-LOT SHORT PLAT ----UL!: e.~ I .............. ...._ ... WA.-l SUBDMSION MAP 1:'1!lf~ ""~ T '":,I (J ----·~ (/I 18000 International Boulevard South, Suite 510 SeaTac, Washington 98188 206-770-8700 + 888-896-1443 fax 206-770-8703 + 253-882-2033 COPIES OF DOCUMENTS ORDER NUMBER: 208163172 FOR PROPERTY ADDRESS: VACANT LAND,, WA MAIN hLl:: 1.,u,.-r FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO I Nam,_ AdlfrHI_ C!ty, S1a11, ED WILSON 17844 120th Ave, S,E, Renton, WA 98055 Statutory Warranty Deed THl!I SPACE PROVIOED FOR RECORDER'S USE: B?...-1),t.·1 ~ REGD F GASH:T,L 7.00 tt0855 ·1,:1:~:,1:'? .0 5':, THEOR.\NTOR RW~kl c:. H(Jt•~CMl Mll l!.M'l!,1\R/1f: A. ::rttF:C,f.,:.N. 0J:: f,OCCCS!:01,:~;. 11:. rnu:.rr-E~: or TliF. JEN-l c. N)N,1'., TRIJ:iT Oi\Tl:O l=EBRll.\l::v n. 111)!3 forandinconsidcrationof IH' lXilLAf!S NIU OlHEh' VAl.1,IN.',U· •.:Ui~:TOEF-:ATHt/~. inblndpal'1,CGn¥q11ndw1mntstD r,r:l"JRr.F. E. ~fIL'Xtl NID :>IIAR•'JJ I'. Wil.:3•:r,. J11J·~r.,vm NlU wr1:c lhc followinJ dci.cribcd tu! CJ tile, 1itv.au:d In the COW11)' of Kl rv1 , S111cofWuhinJt0n: un fl, m.c,:;1< 1, tltlP.lltWf·>Tl!RN UARDl!N Tli:A•.:T:L ri1vr:a('1, W1. I. 1\0:1)~:L}JN<j m nu: PLA'r 1HEREOF l.:ECor.:orn ltl VCILtlM( t,~ ,J(. nAI ~ .• /'AGE 111, 1/1 l( 1111; C:UUN IV, WA5HWllr< .. "'fl; OCF.l"T Ttlli Wl::H H!i H1:r. SLl8,IF.CI 10; f,l:( EXllll'.JT 11 /1,11 AT1AO~m Hl~l'TO J,t4/i f:V rn1~: F:f:FrRrn,::E ;!ORJ.'ORATED ttJ::RElN NID MMF A Pi\li:r 1-IJiRl:•jS:, STATE OF WASHINGTON l u, COUNTY OF ______ _ 0a this da)' pcnonally 1ppurcd bdon: me 10 me known 10 ~ lhr individual ducribcd in 11111 who cim11cd the .,.,.hhln and fore1oin1 lru1rumcnl, ' and 1ckllowlcd1ed thJt 1i1ncd lhc wne • 11.S frt:e and volumuy aC'I and dccJ, ,ror 1hc u1c, and pulflOKS \herein mcn1ioncd. GrvEN under my hand and offid1! Kai thi1 __ da)'o( ,19 __ Lf1 i--l:i.L~ c· /1,J..;. 1 ... ./ Not1ry Publi~ in •IMI (or Lhc Sutc or Wa.ihin(lon, rtS1din111 __________ _ LPD·IO STATE OF WASHINGTON l "· COUNTY OF _______ _ Onthil ___ d.iyof_ .19--- bdu"' me, the undcnlgne&!, a Nowry Puhlir In and for lhc Stale of W.:uh· initon, duly commiuionnl and 1..,,om, pc:nolWI)' appeared-------- n:spmivcl), of .,.----c-o-,--,-,-----,---,---,---,---,.,.,- lhc corporation UL:lt cuculrd lhc fon:1uing ln,tNmcn1, and 1cknowlcd1c.d \he 1:1id in· mumcni to be \he fm: ar,J volunhry atl and deed or uid corponuion, for !he um and purpol-CI lhen:in mention«!, and on 0.1\h uaied IN! _____ authorired tone· cute the 11.ld inllNmelll ~nJ L'lal ihc: 1UI arthcd is the corp:u,1c 1c.al nf uid corron1ion. 1cn, Witr.c11 my hand and official K.11! hcrt:lo 1rfltc:l lhc da)' 1nJ yur finl tbo~c writ• Nou.ry Publk in and (or \hi:: State of Wuhingtan, re1iding1t------------- r,, &XIIIDI't ""'" '1'0 STl\ltl'l'i:lRY WMnANrr OP.ED SU0.1£C'r ro: \ 0 a, (l) l, RESTRICTIONS CONTAINr,o ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT AS FOLLOWS: 2, No lot pr portion o! a lot in this plat sholl be divided nnd sold or resold, or ownership changed or transferred whereby the ownership of any portion o! thia plat shall be less thar, t:he area required £or the uso district sta~ed on this pl~t, namely 35,000 square feet !or S~l Suburban Uae, with a minimum lat ?r tract width of 13S feet, Water to be secured !rom local improvement district. Sewage disposal to be by use o! septic tanks and dispersal ficldu or appr-oved design, RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED 1N DECI.ARAT!ON or PROTECTIVE RESTRICTIONS OECI.ARATION DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: February 28, 1989 Mat·ch l, 1989 890J010610 J. RECITAL CONTAINED IN SAID PI.AT AS FOI.I.OWS: All lots to have undivided interest in said Tract "A 11 for egress, ingress and utilities. 4. Right of the public to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises in the reasonable original grading of streets, avenues, alleys and roadu, as dedicated in the plnt. S, All othat oasomonta, roattictiona, rauocvations and agco~montu of rocord, if any. ·1 i I ' ' , :fi;Zs&&u ........................................................... TRANSAM f.RICA TinE INSURANCE Trans.,mt'rka THIS SPACE PROV I OED FOR RECORDER'S US!: l Tillt< lnsurMcc Comp:my FJLEO FOR RECono AT ntOUE!lT OF WHEN RECORDED RETURN 10 11,11111 ... ,F.(l .. Wi.lson ............ . :si ,1 ii! f! ~: I . .................................................. 1 .. . Addron.U6.4!Ll20.th .. Ave. .... SE ......... CUy, 61110, Zlp .. , ___ ,Renton, ... WA .... 98055 ............................................................ . Quit Claim Deed THE GRANTOR George E & Sharon P, Wilson /oTlmrl in consideration of $ l. 00 convoy1 nnd quit cloims to Edward Charles .Wilson ,.. 8 the following described renl estate, situated In the County or together with oil nftcr acquired tit.le of tho gmntor(e) therein. Stoto of Washington, Legal. l'OR'IH,IESTERN GARDEN TRS DIV U , BI.K-2 LOr-9 LF.SS I'/ 375 !'I' S 90 '!'I' 10FW150FT Parcel ID, 619660 0540 D:ucJ .. +f::. .:'/.. . . 19 .. .'t.J'.. ~ Q •. ~ ~_/7 L. Jt.~. ... ... By ............... . • r. fln1hvi~u11l) (Prcsii!ent) By. (Scm111ry) STATE OF WASHINGTON J ... COUNTY OF-..... ,-........ -·-·-.... -·---··- On th!.• ilny J)f'n:nnnlly n11prorcd bcloro mo On thl1 ..... __ .. _ ... , .. day of ..................... --...... -............................ , 19 ............ , beforo mo, the utideniigried, ti Nolary Public In and for tho State or Wa.,11' 6,.~,-~ .. lvf!..:.htM..1,.SJMl;i)..i.:.fY.,~a;.}in,lon, duly commluloncd o.nd sworn, pnaonnlly nppoarcd .............................. , \11 111<' knnwn 111 IK' 1he lndivhlunl dncrlbtd in and who <'tl'nilrd the \filhln and forci;olni; hutruml!nl, 1111d 11cknow/~Ji::1od lhnt .:r.Jrhl.Y, .. •lirnrd Iha NlnO n~ :rj.r{E..I.~ ..... fr'-'11 ond volunLory ael and dN'd, fnr lht' u11t'R nml IIIHfKHtrl thcnln mtnllonet.1. ond .. ,_ ... , ............ -...... ,_ ................................................................................. _., ___ .• ., Co 1no known l.o bo thl' ....................... _ ... Presldont .ond ......................... Sttrl'lory, mpt'cUvely, or .•• _. __ ................................. -......................... -................................... . tho curporot\on thnt t'Jt'culed lht> forcKQln1 inalrumcnt, and ocknowlcda;I."(] Iha uid in.,trum11nt lo be tht> lrt>c ond voluntol')' act ond deed or ,aid t"!lrpor. 11.tion, for lho u.n and purt>Oac. lhcrt:>ln m,nlianl'd, ond on 011th 111.nkd \hat ........................... _ ... oulhorlicod lcl cxecuto the 1111d instrument ond thol tho 1eol ~EN undl'r m)' hund and officl.al,..r,mil O lhl.l . '. aflht'd ta the rorporo\e ,~o\ or 11aid corpomlion . ... ¥J"'l,··· ... d donyy o~t!l'T'tin..P..,.$. ......... -· ... ;t,.9J.. , · ~bov'f~i:J.f::n':1>' hind nnd officinl 1eal herrlcl 4JIJ.u.•d !ho day and )'eDr Dnl ~~~~·~~~~r~~t ·· .. .' Nolary Public In rmd for the Stnto of Wr11h 0 ln1t~;~:· ... in~ton, ruitJin11 nt .. ~.lt.~ ..... lJ.1.fi:rr.uM.J., 1. ·, rc.Jdln1 oL .......... "······-...................... -................... _ ..•• Illy 11ppointmcnl ~1tpirc1: •.. 'ft.:! .. ':!..: ... ~.7.. ..... · My 11ppolntmcnt expires: ................................................. . Ei339042 i0/2B/i 993 .oo .oo L 20040429002080.001 I H 11111111 I rn Filed for Record at Request of Robert M Smythe 20040429002080 PAClFlC NW TlT CT ze BB PAGEB81 OF HS 04/29/2884 13.07 KlNG COUNTY, IIR LAW OFFICES OF SMYTHE & SMYTHE 29 First Street NE Auburn, WA 98002 Gran tor/Borrower: Grantee/Beneficiary: Abbreviated Legal: Tax Parcel No: G @a FILED BY PNWT w i -z;-i, j --"2---- Edward Charles Wilson and Nhan Phi Busselle, Husband and Wife Thomas and Tiffany Tran, Husband and Wife NW Garden Trs Div #1 B 2 L 9 Less W 375 Ft S 90 Ft orw 150 Ft 619660 0540 SG!d docur,,ent(s) Y<em ffled b r.cord bt Pacmc Northwest rrtte .,. acro.,o·odation only II has not been fl..Bmtned as to propar sxecubon Gt" J!f io 11s erfsd upon ~Ile DEED OF TRUST THIS DEED OF TRUST, made thls.z,111day of ffeAtP , 2004, between Grantors EDWARD CHARLES WILSON AND NHAN PHI BUSSELLE, Husband and Wife, whose address 1s 17844 120th Avenue S E., Renton, WA 98055, PACIFIC NORTIIWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, a Corporation, whose address 1s 215 Columbia Street, Seattle, Washington 98104, as Trustee, and THOMAS AND TIFFANY TRAN, Husband and Wife, whose address 1s 5115 23'd Avenue NW, Rochester MN 55901, as Beneficiary. WITNESSETH. Grantor hereby ,rrevocably grants, bargains, sells and conveys to Trustee m Trust, with power of sale, the followmg descnbed real property m Kmg County, Washington Legal Descnpl!on attached hereto as Exhibit A and mcorporated herem by this reference, which real property ,s not used pnnc1pally for agncultural or farmmg purposes, together with all the tenements, hered1taments, and appurtenances now or hereafter thereunto belonging or m any wise appertammg, and the rents, issues and profits thereof This deed 1s for the purpose of secunng perfonnance of each agreement of Grantor herein contamed, and payment of the sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($100,000.00) DEED OF TRUST -I (re/Wilson dot2) 20040429002080.002 with mterest, m accordance with the terms of a Promissory Note of even date herewith, payable to Beneficiary or order, and made by Grantor, wluch term shall mclude all notes evidencmg the mdebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust, mcluding all renewals, modifical!ons and extensions thereof, and also such further sums as may be advanced or loaned by Beneficiary to Grantor, or any of their successors or assigns, together with interest thereon at such rate as shall be agreed upon. TO PROTECT THE SECURITY OF THIS DEED OF TRUST, GRANTOR COVENANTS AND AGREES: PRESERVATION AND MAINTENANCE DE PROPERTY To keep the property m good condition and repair, to permit no waste thereof, to complete any buildmg, structure or improvement being built or about to be built thereon, to restore promptly any bmlding, structure or improvement thereon which may be damaged or destroyed; and to comply with all laws, ordmances, regulations, covenants, cond11Ions and restnc!Jons affecting the property 2 TAXES CHARGES I JENS To pay before delmquent all lawful taxes and assessments upon the property, to keep the property free and clear of all other charges, hens or encwnbrances 1mpamng the secunty oftlus Deed of Trust 3 HAZARD INSURANCE To keep all bmldmgs now or hereafter erected on the property descnbed herem conl!nuously msured against Joss by fire or other hazards in an amount not less than the total debt secured by this Deed of Trust All pohc1es shall be held by the Beneficiary, and be m such compames as the Beneficiary may approve and have loss payable first to the Beneficiary, as its mterest may appear, and then to the Grantor The amount collected under any insurance pohcy may be applied upon any mdebtedness hereby secured in such order as the Beneficiary shall determme Such apphcal!on by the Beneficiary shall not cause discontinuance of any proceedings to foreclose this Deed of Trust In the event of foreclosure, all nghts of the Grantor in insurance pohc1es therem m force shall pass to the purchaser at the foreclosure sale 4 DEFENSE DE RIGHTS QR POWERS DE BENEFICIARY QR IBJISIEE To defend any acl!on or proceeding purporting to affect the secunty hereof or the nghts or powers of Beneficiary or Trustee, and to pay all costs and expenses, includmg cost of title search and attorney's fees m a reasonable amount, m any such action or proceeding, and m any suit brought by Beneficiary to foreclose tlus Deed of Trust 5 PAYMENT DE COSTS ANO EXPENSES: To pay all costs, fees and expenses m connection with this Deed of Trust, including the expenses of the Trustee mcurred in enforcing the obligation secured hereby and trustee's and attorney's fees actually mcurred, as proY!ded by statute. 6 PRQIECIIQN DE BENEEJCTARY'S RIGHTS IN PROPERTY: Should Grantor fail to pay when due any taxes, assessments, insurance premmms, hens, encwnbrances or other charges agamst the property heremabove descnbed, Beneficiary may pay the same and the amount so paid, DEED OF TRUST -2 (re/Wilson dot2) 20040429002080.003 with interest at the rate set forth in the Note secured thereby, shall be added to and become a part of the debt secured in this Deed of Trust IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED TI!AT 1. EMINENT QOM Alli In the event any port10n of the property 1s taken or damaged in an eminent domain proceedmg, the entlre amount of the award or such portion as may be necessary to fully satisfy the obhgat10n secured hereby, shall be paid to Beneficiary to be applied to said obhgal!on 2 NQNWAIYER DE BREACH By acceptmg payment of any sum secured hereby after its due date, Beneficiary does not waive its nght to require prompt payment when due of all other sums so secured or to declare default for failure to so pay 3 RECQNVEYANCE BY TRI JSIEE The Trustee shall reconvey all or any part of the property covered by this Deed of Trust to the person entitled thereto, on wntten request of the Grantor and the Beneficiary, or upon sahsfactJon of the obhgat10n secured and wntten request for reconveyance made by the Beneficiary or the person entitled thereto. 4 DEE AT IT I BY GR ANTQR Upon default by Grantor in the payment of any mdebtedness secured hereby or m the performance of any agreement contained herem, all sums secured hereby shall 1mmed1ately become due and payable at the optlon of the Beneficiary. In such event and upon wntten request of Beneficiary, Trustee or their agent shall sell the trust property, m accordance with the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washmgton, at public auction to the lughest bidder. Any person except Trustee may bid at Trustee's sale Trustee shall apply the proceeds of the sale as follows ( 1) to the expense of the sale, mcludmg a reasonable Trustee's fee and attorney's fee; (2) to the obhgal!on secured by this Deed of Trust, (3) the surplus, if any, shall be distributed to the persons entitled thereto 5 TRUSTEE'S DEED Trustee shall deliver to the purchaser at the sale its deed, without warranty, which shall convey to the purchaser the mterest m the property wluch Granter had or had the power to convey at the !Jme of !us execu!Jon of this Deed of Trust, and such as he may have acquired thereafter Trustee's deed shall recite the facts showmg that the sale was conducted in compliance with all the reqmrements oflaw and of this Deed of Trust, wluch recital shall be prima facie evidence of such comphance and conclusive evidence thereof m favor of bona fide purchaser and encumbrancers for value 6 NQNEXCI TTSIYE REMEDY The power of sale conferred by tlus Deed of Trust and by the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washmgton 1s not an exclusive remedy; Beneficiary may cause this Deed of Trust to be foreclosed as a mortgage 7 SI JCCESSQR TR) lSIEE In the event of the death, incapacity, d1sab1hty or resignation of DEED OF TRUST -3 (re/Wilson dot2) 20040429002080.004 Trustee, Beneficiary may appomt m wntmg a successor trustee, and upon the recording of such appointment m the mortgage records of the county m which this Deed of Trust 1s recorded, the successor trustee shall be vested with all powers of the ongmal trustee The trustee 1s not obhgated to notify any party hereto of pendmg sale under any other Deed of Trust or of any action or proceedmg m which Granter, Trustee or Beneficiary shall be a party unless such action or proceedmg 1s brought by the Trustee 8 DI IE QN SAi E If the premises or any part thereof are sold, transferred, encumbered or conveyed without pnor wntten consent of the Beneficiary, then the Beneficiary may declare all sums secured by the Deed of Trust unmed1ately due and payable. This provision apphes to each and every sale, transfer or conveyance regardless of whether the Beneficiary has consented or waived his nghts m conneclion with any previous sale, transfer or conveyance 9 STJCCESSQRS AN]) ASSIGNS This Deed of Trust applies to, mures to the benefit of, and 1s bmdmg not only on the parties hereto, but on their heirs, dev1sees, legatees, admirustrators, executors and assigns The terms "Beneficiary" shall mean the holder and owner of the Note secured hereby, whether or not names as Beneficiary herem GRANTOR GRANTOR ~k.J~4/,d-- EDWARD CHARLE WILSON STATEOFWASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me EDWARD CHARLES WILSON AND NHAN PHI BUSSELLE, Husband and Wife, to me known to be the imhviduals descnbed m and who executed the w1thm and foregomg mstrument and acknowledged to me that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes therein mentioned. Given ~~~W~11offic1al seal thisd-,day of Ai\... , 2004. 0:: 11,<(; ...... ,\\\\\\111, ,,,. ( ..ti. # ,li,-,,l:;.."'0 " ~·•,,, ~ • nv\ :, ~ !'IF .. 01~ I~ ~ '::: :: f8 "' " .i ~ NOTARY PUBLIC m d for the State of :::; ~ ,..,,_ ,: ~ ~ ·" '""•"\c, J E Washington, residing at IL~ ~t. y>,,.,(,7.28·~"".br; ~ My appomtment exprres / ( 2-5( . o, . .,, -.. '''"'\\\\\W'° .-' ..;: 11111 Op WAt.-1<\,..$" ''"""""'" DEED OF TRUST -4 (re/Wilson dot2) 20040429002080.005 REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEY ANCE DO NOT RECORD TO BE USED ONLY WHEN NOTE HAS BEEN PAID TO Trustee,------------------- The undersigned is the legal owner and holder of the Note and all other mdebtedness secured by the withm Deed of Trust Said Note, together with all other indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust, has been fully paid and satisfied, and you are hereby requested and directed, on payment to you of any sums owmg to you under the terms of said Deed of Trust, to cancel said Note above rnentloned, and all other evidences of mdebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust, and to reconvey, without warranty, to the partles designated by the tenns of said Deed of Trust, an the estate now held by you thereunder DATED NAME DEED OF TRUST -5 (re/Wilson dot2) EXHIBIT A Lot 9, Block 2, Northwestern Garden Tracts, Division No. 1, According to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 45 of Plats, Page 47, in King County, Washington, except the West 375 feet. 20040429002080.006 :: • .. u~~L~RATION OF COVENANT !n consideration of approval by King County of an oewage disposal system for the property descd.bcd on-~.1te below, hereby ~"'l:'-"'1?'-'A.;;;=:l~l=~.,~==c,.,'-'c;,---,,-,-,..,-,,-,..,=--, property owner,, covenant and agree as follows: 1. 2. 3 •. Ilk, the grant.Jr hP.i:e:i.n, is/;u:.a. the owner in fee simple of (an-=.:.~.:erest in) property wit:hiri-K1.ng County, which is legally described ;,ic follvws ( leg·a1 description): Lp~.:p,.,~z~fc~?'C'--o;; . 6totnti1triiS!FR&' ~ --~ on vtlch a resi ence will be constructed having a deaiqno.~ed eddrua af //CfO :SE. t(je,'Vl$f", I/JII{ have requested the approval by King County of the on-site_sewage disposal system for the above described property. I/We recognize that when the existing t-11'!':,t:i.,:: sy~te:r. ser\'ing the proposed residence fails, an alternative type of septic c.ystem such as a sand filter or mourid will be required to be installed in the reserve area as a repair to the existing cystem. 4. 'l'hJ.s Declaration :,-,f Cond.!.ti..,r,.l., C:,venants ,and RestrictionE is bindi.ig :~pc.-. ;,.;.: l",t!i.i;.s, assignee3 a.nd successors i..-1 in!.e-:es:t a~ "':he owner., of the abovi?- described property and is a covenant running with the land. S. This Daclaration of Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions shall ·not be .released without the e.<pressed ,-, wrltten approval of the Se?.ttle-King coug.;.>'o39tflartment KD&4'J 6 of Public Health or its s11ccessor. Rl::CD F ::s.oo ·cR5H5L Dwner {sl1JnatureJ On thi.11 ~ clay of F1:1e9,e,t,y l9fi. before me oonally appeared F/2. /1/Jl-bQµ · to me known to be th81IniUV1aualji1 r ot--'*te--e&e:pQ.rJMid:ol\) described here"'i"n,-e-an'"d:r--:w"'h"o--:e"'x"e"c"u"t"e"d,.....,,t"h~e foregoing instrument as thP.ir free and voluntary act and deed for tha unet1 and purposea herein mentioned. ****'S.00 55 Witneos my hand and cf J.'eB(hJPl~/:( Deal hereto affixed the , 19§:f.. ZB '1!m d a:i,,, c;:--< ~ PILING: :,,:;i5"'f ~t.:..:,:r . · .•. ···.;·" .. :,'} .... :.~.~.::).:,,_}. Nota~i~nd to,~j 0 . . ...... State of W,1Jhington, res1<g~ - .. ;;\._,'-,,,·' at 4tJ'P~ ~c'l..i&t'-~------<""-.·g ::1 .. ,•' Oel>%rt""2:r.t of Recor"dH"1:i'nd Elections llaoq '311 -Ung County Admin Bldg Pourth and James 51!al'tle, Washingt.on 9810,S ~elephane, 344-3964 .. "' " ~ "' "' I I I ii .:.'. J ··~-.. --~"""'"" .. -4~"4 s WART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY Subdivision Guarantee Guarantee No.: SG-2631-12236 Effective Date: February 13, 2008 at 12:00 AM Fee: $350.00 Order Number: 208163171 The County of KING and any City within which said subdivision is located in a sum not exceeding $1,000.00 That, according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matters affecting the title to the land included within the exterior boundary of said Subdivision Guarantee, the only parties having any record title interest in said land whose signatures are necessary, under the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, on the certificates consenting to the recordation of said map and offering for dedication any streets, roads, avenues and other easements offered for dedi.cation as shown in Subdivision Guarantee. MAIN F iLE copy Signed under seal for the Company, but this Guarantee Is to be valid only when It bears an authorized countersignature . Countersigned by: ~./!CO stewart ~----. A~!}d Senior Chalrmanotte Board Authorized Countersignature • STEWARTTnLE Compeny SEA TAC, Washington City, State President Guarantee Serial No. SG-2631-12236 In writing this company please address it at P.O. Box 2029, Houston, Texas 77252, and refer to the printed Serial Number. SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Guarantee No.: SG-2631-12236 Order Number: 208163171 Reference Number: TRAN Subdivision Guarantee: Sales Tax: Effective Date: February 13, 2008 at Total: OWNERS: BRENDAN. TRAN, AN UNMARRIED WOMAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION: $350.00 $31.15 $381.15 LOT 8, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISON NUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE SOUTH 90 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET THEREOF. SUBJECT TO: 1. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF DECLARATION OF COVENANT: RECORDED: JULY 19, 2002 RECORDING NO.: 20020719000649 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SURVEY RECORDED JUNE 13, 2005 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20050613900009. 3. GENERAL TAXES, WHICH AMOUNT CANNOT BE PAID UNTIL FEBRUARY 15, 2008. YEAR: 2008 AMOUNT: $1,606.83 LEVY CODE: 4250 TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 619660-0520-09 ASSESSED VALUATION: LAND: $156,000.00 IMPROVEMENTS: $0.00 Guarantee No: SG-2631-12236 / SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE The Company's liability for this report is limited to the compensation received. This report is based on the Company's property records, and no liability is assumed for items misindexed or not indexed in the public records, or for matters which would be disclosed by an inquiry of parties in possession or by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. This report and the legal description given herein are based upon Information supplied by the applicant as to the location and identification of the premises in question, and no liability is assumed for any discrepancies resulting therefrom. This report does not represent either a commitment to insure title, an examination of or opinion as to the sufficiency or effect of the matters shown, or an opinion as to the marketability of title to the subject premises. I certify this is a true accurate reflection of those documents on file at the King County Court House, Seattle, Washington as of the date and time referenced above. Don Peters :dp Guarantee No: SG-2631-12236 ' ,' 13 12 WHI 0240 ,,, -... , ..... •' 10ml 028 ' 111111 022l 10 ;; ' ' I ' I ' I ' I ' I ' I ' I ' I ' I ' ORDER NO. --'z=o_.9},u..,t ""-'L!-' JL./<---- Section ___ Township Range Short Plat Rec. No. ------ Volume 'f '> Page 'i 1 lo:; \ • .-KCllA. S89til0ltl8 (~ I "'1 \ /1.<e. ~ g ,., In JO rl. RO. [SIil. t l I a> t.1 .. "'1 •2 • \ (l i 1 i Ii ---------------~-~-----------------------------r.::ar~-----"- ------------------------- ~ ~~- ---------------------------------" ... : .. ;;. • ... ~,\.,;> \ ,) • L0016 -"" ' f-'' / ' (.' KC. LlA. 1~91 \t:JJ'°' t,, .= I ) .r , 0 s• 9r:Jl ,:,. • '4,.CS>r g"' n.~•,,'?J -, '. : 7 ,V"' lUD: 14Dill ' 1 , 1· IUFf(I: nool I \ J - 1m~.ml'-----~----1 TDl· unll , ' 1 .. ~\ \l muf 1.00 ., ••• 0481 1~1.!1 "' '" 8 ..... ~, • ... ~.;. • !HOOi '" 0021 ,. " . .. .... " ., . " " ,, "' #.,, ;,,~ .. '\ e"'Y ,,,. ,,• ... ~,. .. .............. .. ... ' -1on1 t N - I -~ ,,~ ~ ------JI JQ L--...IL-..::::::_J._ ... _..1 ... w.1.1..-J.-..!l.-..J-----...illl-·'ll.."-------1 1mof 1om1 ("42 ("41 1D5l~f 11543 " 0544 ,,. •• ..... " = ... "' • ••• • L -,, " ,, " .,, . .,~.,, 382040 • " JD ~ " JD 1l1D1I •• OYS -t\ i .:,~ ;-i\,, .. -It' t KfN~ $,' .... •• EDY L. J, ,m,1 ,arnl VOL7S.-fi 0020 1mo1 ufflO .. .. -rS 11:)0-11 l 0030 . '" ' LOT : " ' . ·~ ,, 1001 -."') ' ' anor IJ!'!O ... - ) INT. HII :: ..: I " ,u .... , ... - ICC! • " ' . I u1a1 • ~ ..... - nWI .. ITU<,. . This sketch is provided without charge for your information. It is not intended to show all matters related to the property including, but not limited to area, dimensions, easements, encroachments or location of boundaries. It is not a part of, nor does it modify, the commitment or policy to which it is attached. The company assumes NO LIABILITY for any matter related to this sketch. Reference shoui.! be made to an accurate survey for further information. I 18000 International Boulevard South, Suite 510 SeaTac, Washington 98188 206-770-8700 + 888-896-1443 fax 206-770-8703 + 253-882-2033 COPIES OF DOCUMENTS ORDER NUMBER: 208163171 FOR PROPERTY ADDRESS: 179XX 118TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST, RENTON, WA 98058 "Branch ':STK,User :8763 KING,WA Document: DED WAR 2006,0227002064 .;,. )rder: 208163 171 Title Officer: 41 Cai, Station Id : BXRE 20060227002064 .001 AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: Name Yalloy Escrow Co., Inc. Addr&S6 22142 S.E. 2371h St., Suite 8 Clly, State, Zip Maple Valley, WA 98038 1111111111111111 20060227002064 PAClP'lC Nl,I HT UI> 3J ·" PAO ell OF 2 121i 1 7121M :41 KIN& COUNT'\', UA E2188954 'l'rneee u:29 I< N COUNT'!', , IO .~ 11 11:li,:oo PMiilllt OF Ht FILED BY PNW I , Statutory Warranty Deed J!7. g 3 g3 , 'y THE GRANTOR FRANK M. LEIGHTON and MARJORIE ~GHTON, Hu1b1nd and Wire for and in coruidcration of Ten Doll an and other valuable contlderatlon in hnnd paid, conveys and warrants to BRENDAN. TR.AN, An Unmarried Woman the following described real estate, situated in the Cowtty of KING, ·state of Washington: Loi 8, Block 1, Northwestern Garden Tracll Division Number 1, according to the pl111 tbereor recorded In Volume 45 oCJ>lats. page 47, In King County, Wa1hlnglon; EXCEPT the south 90 reet of the west 150 feet thereof. SUBJECT TO: BASEMBNTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND COVENANTS AITACHED HERETO AS SCHEDULE •e•. Aucssor', Property Tax Parcel Account Numbcr(a): 619660--0520-09 Dated this 27th day of:February, 2006. STATEOFWASHJNGTON COUNTY OF KING I certify lhat l know or have ntiafactcny evidtllCC that FRANK M. LEIGHTON and MARJORIE M. LEIGHTON arc the persons who awearcd bc~ore me, and said pcnons acknowlcdg~ that THEY signed this· .instrument and aclcnowledged it to be mEIR rree and voluntary act for the use, and pUIJ>Olcs mentioned in this instrument. Daccd: Nocary Public in and for the Stale of Washington Re.siding 11 MAPLE VALLEY My 1ppointmcn1 expires: 04n9n006 LPB-10 Page I of2 Printed on 2/1/2008 10:13:06 AM , ' Branch':STK,User :8763 )rder: 20816317 I Title Officer: 4 I Co, NOTE 2: A survey of the herein described property was recorded under Recording Number 20050613900009, a copy of which is hereto attached. Station Id :BXRE 20060227002064.002 KING.WA Page 2 of2 Printed on 2/1/2008 10:13:07 AM Document: DED WAR 2006.0227002064 , Branch :STK,User :8763 )rder: 208163171 Title Officer: 41 C01. Station Id :BXRE KING,WA I t0060~13'fOOOO'f nut POl!TIOH or Tl!£ --1'!!..i;, . .!!!...u~. Ht'TID!I -~:L TO•Hs1w 1 -~l t101mt. ~1;1 ...!!?_ EAST, u1. I '\.l:i".:.:·::.:.. i · r--------,----,,, ,_, ---,--------: I 'I : : ! I, ~ I 1-·--1 ---,,~--1---1-;;.··----~,f,:it'----;,,·'--1----i 1 60 p i'~o' I ' I I t> l5gl : l(CiJ:c I , ~ j(_c\, I , I N ~ ,,,,· I ~ ~· I , : ~i GRAPH!~ SCA~ '11 ~/!?'-::' ______ i __ --·'!ffil· __ _[ _________ j ·~r i: -et' ·-1 l~: [_\"-" "' 10 • ,,... ~ 9 ,pJl I :: ~ , .. ,..ii... --~--1 ... IP!.ri.'-., G ... ,, , ... .,.p 11vr:.·r,~•·51or , t < 111 n:n I r '' 11tS'fo\<J\ '1 11$ f I , , .. ~ . "" " I 1 .... o• ,:.. I o~1'1\c1'5· ,fl, rG ill , l F::~ ____ :, .. ::_~~--------~ 1, r 11 ,.,. • ' I I ' ·-=---I L ---: ,c.i ,:..~\'. ------.,,__ ;:.e.c:,-~ SE tBOTHSTREET ~ ------------_,,,.._,,I"\ \I ~ •' .....-.-........ ., -------------~----------.:i B.4.5:l3' or Bf:ARlliC/$: ........ ,,, __ ... ____ ... _ __ .,., ... ..._.,u _ _,, ----1'1P«.'<1$>_ .. _ CtmS!1 ~DIC&, :.=.i.1 :.::..:---=! ~ ":' ..... .c:.-:.. "'i.:. T" ..... _ ., __ _ ll Dah UfDIO: +--.. -$-·-o--·-• ...... -............. "'~•"".fl!lr-':Jr, rs, =..Tl{..-:J:.,,.'°.,.. f<J_. ................ ,c,, .... ,._ ·--- = ........ ....,_,.,.,. ____ ... ··-· .. --.. ----.., __ ,_,,,.,...._.._ _...,, .. ., ....... r;=-::u;E..f=E.Jr.!'L~• ... ___ ..., ____ _ :=.i:.r:::::::-...:::,':t=:::= ~ ... ,.,,o--•-•••-" -.. -. .._ .. ._ __ ::".:.'::'::'::»"~:.":'\I" .. p~-::z:..-==.-:'.t:.:: ~..:...-..,1-b% , ...,_., _ 111,\T POIITIOII or m,; tor l/4, !fl' 1/4, SEC'T10N 33 TOnrmm> _23_ rmlffll, PAl!ll& 06 u.sr, W,M. LOT SURVCY R[CORO OF SURVEY S'WZ:or~ Page I of I llfll:",, &ff,. .. -lBIL ., -.. l!..~:::~. ·-·-,=,7..-- I ITTJCRON!S & ASSOC. [ill LAND SURVEYORS ---·"" ____ _ Printed on 2/1/2008 10:13:09 AM Document: SUR 2005.0613900009 ; 'B;anch':STK,User :8763 0\ -..:r- \..0 0 C) C) 0\ ~ t'--- C) C'i C) C) "" KING.WA )rder: 208 I 63171 Title Officer: 4 I Cor .. Return Address DR STRONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC 10604 NE 3/t' PL SUITE 101 KIRKLAND, WA 98033 (42S) 827-3063 02155.000 nleasc onnt or rune S GTON onnauon WA lflN 0 STATE REC RDER'S Cover Sheet Document T1Ue(s) (or tnlnSacbons eontsmed therem)( all areas app~cable to you document must be ftled m) l Declaradon of Covenant 2 3 4 Reference Numbor(s) ofDocuments asS1gned or released Additional reference #'son nage of document Grantor(s) (Last name flm, then first name aod lDlbals) 1 Balley, Bryan 2 3 4 Adchbonal names on oage of document Grantoe(s) (Last name first, then first name aod 1D1bals) 1 Balley, Bryan 2 3 4 Additional names on na11e of document Legal doscnpllon (abbrovuued 10 lo~ block, plat or socbon, township, renge) Section 33, -Township 23 Range 05 Adchnonal lo2al 1S on oage of document Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number 6196600520 Assessor Tax # not vet aas1rm.ed The Auchtor/Recoeder will rely on the mfonnauon provided on the form The staff will not read the document to vcnty the accuracy or completeness of the mdexmg information proVIdcd herem Station Id :BXRE Page I of2 Printed on 211 /2008 I 0: 13: 11 AM Document: COY 2002.0719000649 I ' ' Branch :STK,User :8763 rder: 208163171 Title Officer: 41 Cm: Station Id :BXRE O"\ ~ \..0 0 0 0 O"\ ~ ~ 0 N 0 0 N KING,WA DECLARATION OF COVENANT In consideration of approval by Kmg County of an on-site sewage disposal system for the property descnbed below, property owners hereby covenant and agree as follows We, the grantor(s) here1D, is/are the owner(s) ID fee simple of (an mterest ID) property withtn Kmg County, wluch ts legally described as follows LOT 8, BLOCK 2 OF NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS; PARCEL# 6196600520 2 We have requested the approval by Kmg County of the on-site sewage disposal system for the above-descnbed property. 3. We agree to remove the kttchen ID the I-bedroom residence/garage at the time of occupancy of the future 4-bedroom residence 11ns will be done by removmg one of the follow1Dg items, stove, refugerator or kitchen smk. 4, Tins Declaratmn of Conditions, Covenants, and Reatncltons 1s bindmg upon our hel!S, asS1gnees, and succeasorn m mterest as the ownern of the above-deacnbed property and ts a covenant run- rung with the land S Tins Declaral!on of Condtl!ons, Covenants and Restncl!ons shall not be released without the expressed wntten appro of the Seattle-Kmg County Department of Pubhc Health or its successor Owner ~ day of c[J1.,, , 20,2h before me personally appeared to me known to be 11,oi sj:t d ls) ( ±be !mJ111!dP0 I) described herein and who executed the foregomg msllumcnt as theil' free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes herem mentioned. Witness my hand an!l,iflllllaerm affixed the Jii.l ti;' J ul,E . "''- .. ,,~\;. L J/\c,!,, <'I J<2>' ,:-4.v.,1111 41 •,.n, -"o •'!,SlON i'• \lo:-:. ~ ·~~' -t.cf, -;z,..,, E IJ:'lo~ ~ o 'TA 'l >-~\ ':, Notary Pub cm and for the StB_l9 ~ : i" -e -"! : OfWaslungton, residing at ~!!:f.!.J.J €.-/ -I I • :.~\ llu 8 1,.\C I~= ~ ... 'f~. 11.01-03 •• ~o,,: ',:.<:-· ••••••••• ~ ......... ,,,fFwAs'rl\,•" I II 11111\\ T\k02\l\02160\0SDC-COY doc Page 2 of2 Printed on 2/1/2008 10:13:15 AM Document: COY 2002.0719000649 Web date: 06128/2007 tQ KingCounty AFFIDAVIT CONCERNING CRITICAL AREAS COMPLIANCE Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206·296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING File Number: ) ) ss ) (K?&@&DW&ffj') FEB 2 9 2008 L!:!) K.C. OD E.S. Application Name: '\.'-I IL soJ f1:1?.AN 8 -LOT St-lorL T fl.A, Project Location: 1--JE L02.i,.l6lt.. o1= I/ fst-1-f A\/6 S6' J. <;6 I €:sOTl-1 ST~--r, ~a.),,vA The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says: 1. That the affiant is competent to be a witness herein; ~.t ,it~ 2. That the affiant is the applicant for the above project; ~~ Co 3. That to the best of the affiant's knowledge the critical areas on the development prop~al site have not been illegally altered; and 4. That the affiant has not previously been found to be in violation of critical areas regulations for any property in King County, or alternatively, that if there have been any violations, such violations have been/are being resolved to the satisfaction of King County. Et:> ~ILS0~1-JAH"-1 13u':>st-u.6 ~n~4ro/bAeM ~ Date and Place (City and State) I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Check out the DDES Web site at www.kinqcounty.gov/permits AffidavitCriticalAreasComplianceFORM.doc lc-aff-sacomp.pdf 0612812007 Page 1 of 1 f ,.'I) • ECDL.OOICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. ADDENDUM MAtN FtE:·. 1.. Co-,-.' TO: FROM: -DATE: King County Critical Areas Review Staff Jaimee Cornwell, Ecological Land Services, Inc. August 29, 2007 RE: Critical Areas Detennination Report for the Wilson Construction Site, King County, Washington; Parcel Nos. 282305-9012, 332305-9025, 332305-9021, 332305-9058, 332305-9059, 332305-9048, 332305-9070, 619660-0520 and 6 l 9660-0540. This is an addendum to the enciosed Critical Areas Detemiination Report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc., for the Ed Wilson Construction Site in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. The following nine parcels: 282305-9012, 332305- 9025, 332305-9021, 332305-9058, 332305-9059, 332305-9048, 332305-9070, 619660- 0520 and 619660-0540 cover approximately 20 acres and are located. in the northwest •;. of Section 33, Township 23 N, Range 5 E, Willamette Meridian. This addendum describes the building setback requirements as outlined in the King County Code, Clwpter 2 IA.24.200. In summary, a fifteen-foot building setback is required for all critical area buffers or critical areas when no buffers are present. Allowed uses within the fifteen-foot building setback area include the following: landscaping, uncovered decks, building overhangs which do not extend more than 18 inches into the setback area, impervious ground surfaces such as driveways and patios that meet the special drainage provisions specified in the. public rules adopted for various critical areas, utility .service connections when the excavations avoid impacts to the critical area .buffers, and minor encroachments when adequate protection of the buffer is maintained. Please reference the attached Figure 2A Revised Site Map to review the designated building setback requirements that pertain to the Wilson Construction site. .).. K.C. D.D.E.S. ~\ Approximate WeUand Boundary/Unsurveyed ___l~~..__.....~ WeUand E Category III 24,076 sf.; 0 .55 ac. WeUand CD category m 943 sf.; 0 .02 ac. (On-site) Unnamed Tributary 1 \: . Type F Stream~: Wetland AB Category II 8,226 sf.; 0 .19 ac. (On-site) ;11r~~-~-~,~-~-~~~si=,,,,,~---JJ ; ~ ... \ 100' 115' .L.J J/?-1'- LEGEND : Property Boundary I . • I Wetland -----Wetland Buffer -···~ Stream ---Stream Buffer TP-,1. Test Plot Location ) ( Culvert Location 15' Building Setbaclc 0 150 300 j I I ' SCALE IN FEET 1157 3rd Ave., Suite 220 Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414-9305 I DATE: 08-29-07 OWN : JJT/BCB REQ.BY:JC PRJ .MGR:JC CHK: APPR: PROJ.t#: 1587.01 Approximate Wetland Boundary/Unsurveyed ' / ' ' I ~ ' I '' _f-. 25' \. • .,,,.-1 •. '.:'. ,,,, ' \ WeUand HI Category III 7,120 st:; 0.16 ac. (On-site) Big Soos Creek Type F Stream Unnamed Tributary 2 Type F Stream Approximate· · · Culvert Loc ation .,._ \ WetlandJ Category m 9,699 sf.; 0.22 ac. Wetland K Category III 25,525 sf.; 0.59 ac. (On-site) NOTE: Type F Stream mapped by Department of Natural Resources provided on -line at web address: http:l/www3.wadnr.gov/dnrapp5/websltelfpars/viewer.htm Figure2A REVISED SITE MAP Wilson Construction Site Ed Wilson City of Renton, King County, Washington Section 33, Township 23N, Range SE, W.M. 4/13/2007 4:12 PM S:\KJng-WA\County-Pro)ects\1587-Ed WIison Constructlon\1587.01-Wllson Construction Site\15B7.01-Flgures\15B7.01 _SM2_0B2907.dwg brlan • ,. • TO BE COMPLETED BY AP~~lCANT EVALUATION POR AGENCY USE ONLY (i} King County State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 Purpose of the checklist The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW Chapter 43.21 C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for the applicants This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations such as zoning, shoreline and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. rru~©~OW~@ FEB 2 9 2008 K.C. D.D.E.S. TO BE COMPLETED BY AP~~LCANT A. BACKGROUND. I. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Wilson 8-Lot Short Plat 2. Names of Applicant: Ed Wilson and Nahn Busse/le, husband and wife, Brenda Tran 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owners/ Applicant: Owners(Appllcant: Agent: 4. Date checklist prepared: February 28, 2008 5. Agency requesting checklist: Ed Wilson and Nahn Busse/le 12029 SE 17ff" Street Renton, WA 98058 Brenda Tran 12029 SE 17ff" Street Renton, WA 98058 PK Enterprises 23035 SE 26.1" Street Maple Valley, WA 98038 (206) 227.7445 Contact: Mr. Phillip Kitzes EVALUATION POR AGENCY USE ONLY King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, Land Use Service Division 6. Proposed project timing or schedule (include phasing, if applicable): Upon application being deemed complete: Checklist Review: 1-3 months Land Use Review/Hearing: 6-8 months Engineering Review/Permitting: 4-6 months Plat Construction: 2-3 months Home construction is expected to begin in the Summer of 2009 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time. TO BB COMPLBTBD BY AP~~LCANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. • Level 1 Downstream Analysis prepared by Preferred Engineers, LLC, • Critical Areas Determination Report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. • Addendum (Critical Areas Determination Report) prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. • Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc. 9. Do you know of pending applications for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None are known. I 0. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposals, if known. • Preliminary/Final Short Plat Review • SEPA Review • Final Engineering Review (County and Utility District) • Right-of-Way Agreements/Utility Easements (Bonneville Power and others) • NPDES Permit (storm water) • Corp of Engineers Permit (possible) • Forast Practice Permit (possible) 11. Give a complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in the checklist which ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is a 8-Lot short subdivision located on a 2.57-acre site. The current zoning is R-6; thus, there is a potential for 15 lots/residences allowed on the property. A majority of the property is in sensitive areas (a wetland and stream) and their associated buffers which reduces the amount of buildable land on the properties. The minimum lot size is 3,600 square feet (40' x 90?. Sufficient area is provided for recreation on-site, while the proposad storm water pond will be located off-site (easement required-same ownership). Direct access will come from 11Ei" Avenue SE (2 lots) and SE 180th Street (6 lots)- frontage improvements on both roadways is required. Water (12-inch main) and sewer (minimum 8-inch main) will be extended to the project with approvals from Soos Creek (purveyor). 12. Location of the proposal. Please give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your project, including street address, if any. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, please provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Please provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if possible. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to the checklist. (Indicate if maps or plans have been submitted as part of a permit application). TO BB COMPLETED BY AP~uICANT EVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USE ONLY The properties are vacant and there is no address available. Again, one property {Tran) is accessible from 11Ei" Avenue SE and the Assessor's Parcel Number is 619660-0520. The second property (Wilson and Busse/le) is served from SE 1Bd" Street and the Assessor's Parcel Number is 619660-0540. Both properties are located within the Northwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington. (Please see enclosed vicinity map and legal descriptions.) B. ENVIRONMENT AL ELEMENTS. 1. Earth. a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _______ _ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent of slope): The site generally slopes in a northeasterly direction with the steepest slope on site being an isolated area with 10-15 percent downward gradient slope. c. What general types of soil are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, please specify and note any prime farmland. The soils onsite consist of AldetWOOd Gravelly Sandy Loam {AgB and AgC) and Seattle Muck (Sk) soils according to the National Resources conservation Service Survey. {Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no known surface indications of unstable soils on, or in the immediate vidnity of the proposed site location. {Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) e. Describe the purposes, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading will be limited to the construction of the proposed road and acr:ess tract, lots, water, sewer, other utllltles, recreation areas, and the proposed detention facility. There will be approximately 3,000 cubic yards of cut and fill within this project. The project will attempt to balance the amount of cut and fill, so that no additional import or export of material should be necessary. If any import or export of material necessary for this project it will be approved at TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT final engineering and obtained from or deposited to a County approved site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion could occur during clearing and grading operations associated with this project. To minimize the impacts of the project, appropriate erosion control measures will be reviewed and approved by the County prior to construction activity associated with this project. (Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after construction ( for example, asphalt or buildings)? The total lot area is roughly 111, 829 square feet. The area within the public road to be constructed is 2,550 square feet-off-site (within existing right-of-way). With approximately 33,678 square feet in the lots and assuming a maximum 55% impervious surface per lot (Code), there is a total of 18,523 square feet additional impervious surface. Thus, the total new impervious surface area is 21,073 square feet, or 19 percent of the entire site. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction, various measures are expected to. be used to control erosion. These methods include construction during the dry season, the use of silt fences and hay bails, and revegetation of disturbed areas. Specific temporary erosion and sediment control measures will be reviewed and approved by the County prior to construction. (Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers. Inc.) 2. AIR. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke, greenhouse gases) during construction, and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Temporary emmissions (i.e. dust. vehicle related, etc.) from equipment will occur during the construction phase of this project. Upon completion, there will be additional emmisssions from the residences (fireplacas) and residents (automotive, etc.). (Please see enclosed worksheet for green house gases provided by the County.) b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor which may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. BVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY r TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Other than the existing residences and vehicular movements along SE lBrfl' Street and llEI" Avenue SE, there are none to our knowledge. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts, if any: Construction equipment will comply with applicable air quality regulations, as prescribed by the County, State and Federal regulations. Dust emissions will be controlled during site construction by the use of best management practices, including periodic watering of disturbed areas. The project will not rely upon wood burning fireplaces as the primary source of heat for the new homes. All new homes will use natural gas and/or electricity to provide heat, reducing emissions caused by wood burning fires. 3. WATER. a. Surface: I) Is there any surface water on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, associated wetland)? If yes, describe type, provide names, and, if known, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. On-site, there is an existing wetland (Wetland AB) and stream (seasonal tributary) on the project site. A/so, there are several wetlands and streams off-site of this property--including a portion of Big Soos Creek. (For a complete listing of the surface water bodies, please see report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.- includes location and type.) 2) Will the project require any work over or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The entire development is within 200 feet of these water bodies; thus, construction activity will occur within 200 feet of said waters. It may be necessary to extend water (12-/nch) and sewer (8-inch minimum) through portions of the buffers to serve the development-both on-and off-site. (Please see enclosed water and sewer analysis from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District.) In addition, it may be necessary to extend other utilities within these same sensitive areas. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate source of fill materials. EVALUATION POR AGENCY UBE ONLY I TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT At this time, there is no proposed filling or dredging being proposed to construct the development. However, there may be a need for dredging and/or filling based on the design of Soos Creek Water and Utility District for water and sewer extensions onto the project site and/or from adjacent properties. If required, the source of fill would be manufactured on-site with native soils. 4) Will surface water withdrawals or diversions be required by the proposal? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? Note location on the site plan, if any. Not to our knowledge. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn or recharged? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste water material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff and storm water and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will the water flow into other waters? If so, please describe. EVALUATION POR AGENCY USB ONLY I TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Storm water runoff from road improvements and residences will be collected . via a series of connected pipes to be ultimately discharged into an off-site water quality/detention facility. This facility would be for water quality purposes only. Once treated, the water will be discharged at the lowest natural point, to the existing stream channel-Big Soos Creek. (Please see Drainage Report and Conceptual Drainage Plan prepared by Preferred Engineering, LLC). 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. The proposal includes a water quality treatment component to the pond that will filter out contaminants prior to entering ground and/or surface waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: All development and engineering requirements imposed by the County to control the Impacts to the hydrology of the area will be performed by the proponent These include design of the stormwater facilities pursuant to the 2005 KCSWDM. 4. PLANTS. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _..M..._ deciduous tree: alder. maple, aspen, other: cottonwood _..M..._ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: _..M..._ shrubs: _..M..._ grass _..M..._ pasture crop or grain _..M..._ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup. bullrush, skunk cabbage, other: salmonberry water plants: water lily, eelgrass. milfoil, other other types of vegetation (For a complete list of wet soil/water flora, please see report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Vegetation for the road improvements and residences will be removed. In addition, there may be the need to remove vegetation EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY ' TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. with the wetland/stream buffers for utilities requiring a mitigation plan. c. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on near the site. None, to our knowledge. d. List proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The development will have a park area that will be planted according to an approved landscape plan prepared during Iha final engineering phase. In doing so, the daveloper will be compliant with the existing codes and regulations required by the County with respect to preservanca or enhancement of existing vegetation on the site. 5. ANIMALS. a. Circle (underline) any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or. are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: -----Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: rodents Fish: bass, salmon, trout, shellfish, other: ----- b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known. c. ls the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None are proposed at this time .. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES. a. What kinds of energy ( electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and/or natural gas will be used to meet the project's energy needs for light and heat. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY I TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List any other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Construction of the new homes will meet or exceed the necessary energy requirements of the Northwest Energy Code, the 2005 International Building Code, and those additlonal/y adopted by the County. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. a. Are there any environmental health hazards, exposure to toxic chemicals, including risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. I . Describe Special Emergency services that might be required. Not appl/cable. 2. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are proposed at this time. b. Noise. I. What type of noise exists in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing vehicular traffic along SE 1Bd" Street and 118" Avenue SE. 2. What types of levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a Jong-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during site development Construction would ocrur primarily during the daylight hours, and in compliance with all EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY A~~LICANT applicable codes. Heavy equipment, hand tools, and the transpotting of construction equipment generate construdlon noise. At 200 feet from the construdion, Leq would be approximately the following: Activity Clearing Excavation Foundations Building Construction Finishing Leg fin decibels J 71-72 59-77 65 60-72 62-77 Long-term impacts would be those associated with the Increase In site userY. Additional traffic would be generated by future uses. The increase in noise would be typical of a single-family resident/al development of this size and would be considered minimal. Sound levels for various noise sources include: Noise Sources Automobile Statting Closing Car Door Loud Voices Automobile/Truck Traffic Sound Level at _ 100 feetldBAJ 50-55 50-55 50 50 3. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construdion activities will be performed during normal daytime working hours and compliant with the rules and regulations set forth by King County. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE. a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Both properties are vacant and undeveloped. The following is the known current uses of the adjacent properties: • Notth • South • East • West Single-family residences Single-family residences Single-family residence Single-family residences b. Has the site been used for agricultural purposes? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. 'EVALUATION POR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Again, there is a single-family residence with associated outbuildings present on the property. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not applieable. e. What is the current zoning of the site? The current zoning is single family residential R-6 (6 units per acre). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan designation is urban residential medium (Single Family, 4-12 units per acre). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program environment designation of the site? Not app//eable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. As stated previously, there is an existing wetland and stream on this . particular property. (Please see the Critieal Areas Determination Report prepared by Ecologieal Land Services, Inc.) 1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Based on a household occupancy rate of 2.92 people per single- famlly residence, it Is expected that approximately 26 new people will reside in the eight (8) new residences. J. Proposed measures to reduce displacement impacts, if any? None are proposed at this time. k. What are the proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed 8-lot short subdivision with single-family residences is consistent with recent and existing development in the area, current zoning, and comprehensive plan designations. The project w/11 be compliant with the County Code. BVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APr~ICAllT 9. HOUSING. a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is expected that the project will provide up to 8 new single-family residential units in the middle Income level. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 10. AESTHETICS. a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s) not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? nie County's zoning code restricts the building heights of single· family resident/a/ strudures to 35'. Exterior materials will typically consist of wood or hardy backer type siding with brick, rock, or shingle accents. Specific materials will be determined by the home builder at the time of building permit and will comply with applicable County regulations. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any? None are proposed at this time. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE. a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Light and/or glare would occur primarily during evening and night time hours and would be limited to any new street lights, house lights, . and minimal security lighting potentially within the park spaces. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your project? None. d. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 12. RECREATION. a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Maplewood Golf Course and Ron Regis Park are approximately 3.3mlles north of the site. Another golf course, Fai,wood Golf and Country Club, is approximately 2.1 miles to the east of this project. A bit closer, also to the east, is Renton Park along 13dh Avenue SE b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: nie project is proposing to construct an on-site park area to serve the new residents. A development of this size (8 lots) requires 3,120 square feet (8 times 390 square feet) of recreation space which will be provided on-site. EVALUATION l!'OR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION. a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on the site. None are known. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control imp.acts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 14. TRANSPORTATION. a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any: Both portions of this project are Immediately accessible to SE 1Bff' Street and 1 Bff' A venue SE, connecting to SE 1 lfl" Street (Petrovitsky}, which connects directly to SR 167 and SR 405. (Please see Preliminary Plat for proposed access point). b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. The nearest public bus access Is at the intersection of 11 fl" Avenue SE and SE 17fl" Street, which Is approximately one-half mile northwest of this project (Bus Route 155). c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Assuming a minimum of 4 parking spaces per household (2-car garage and a 2-car driveway}, there w/11 be at least 32 new parking spaces provided upon completion of this development d. Will the proposal require any new roads or street, or improvements to any existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). BVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Frontage improvements to both SE 18d" Street and JJEI" Avenue SE will likely be required. Will the project use or occur in the immediate vicinity of water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Based on the /TE Manua~ there will be approximately 80 net new tips per day generated by this project Peak volumes would most likely occur during typical rush hour times of 7:00 -9:00 AM and 4:00 -6:00 PM and would add approximately 8 net new AM peak and PM peak hour trips. g. What are proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The applicant will be responsible for appropriate traffic mitigation fees, which will offset some of the Impacts of the subdivision. Other mitigation Includes the construction of new roads to serve the project. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES. a. Would the project result in an increase need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes. There would be a minimal Increased need for fire and police protection due to an additional 8 new lots In the area. Also, there will be a minimal Impact on the present school system. b. What are proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: Property taxes, building permits and school Impact mitigation fees generated from these residences are expected to mitigate Impacts incurred from this development EVALUATION POR. AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLI.CANT 17. UTILITIES. a. Circle (underline) utilities currently available at the site: electricity. natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: cable television. b. Describe the utilities which are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity: Gas: Water: Refuse: Telephone: Sewer: Cable: Puget Sound Energy Puget Sound Energy Soos Creek Water District Waste Management Qwest Communications Soos Creek Sewer District Comcast Connectioi1(s) to the above mentioned utilities will be negotiated with the Individual purveyor during the building permit and construction phases of this project. There may also be a need for a right-of-way permit(s) to gain acress to the property at construction. There may also be a need to extend an 8-inch or greater line (water and/or sewer) that will be determined at final engineering approval by the utility purveyor. C. SIGNATURE. The above answers are true to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Agent for the Applicant: __________ _ Date Submitted: -------- EVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USE ONLY WILSON-TRAN 8-LOT SHORT PLAT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (619660-0520) LOT 8, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE SOUTH 90 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET THEREOF. (619660-0540) LOT 9, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE WEST 375 FEET. MapQuest: Maps, Addresses, Bur is Directory & SateJlite Photos 17844 120th Ave Se Renton WA 98058-6648 us Notes: Only text visible within note field will print. fl ,,:'· ' ~· i;~ti~ \ All dahts reserved. Use Subiect to License/Coovrioht 0 > • sav.e,,li'lkt ~d maps aryd,diJ:edions. ,to,Jour mol:iile.phone: ]jiit\Now! Page I of I .,,;. l . l • ~' ··. . . ,, ... :.,' . '..,.,, J 1; <I -·~.,t···:l :·;,,, ,ii'/;,_."''~ This map Is Informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to Its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and Its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. http://www.mapquest.com/maps/print.adp?mapdata=p5kqyoo6yZK6LfzObzPBTCo EK3raj ... 2/28/2008 Section I: Buildings Warehouse and Stora e .................... . Other ........................................... , ...... . Vacant ................................................ . Section II: Pavement. ....................... .. Pavement. ........................................... . Version 1. 7 12126/07 Square Feet (in thousands of 2.550.00 Total Project Emissions: Emissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Embodied 98 33 54 41 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 Feet MTC02e Ener 1,994 1,938 737 777 577 723 733 899 339 599 352 1,278 162 150 374 129 266 181 257 47 127500 139995! Sources: ,..111 Residential Commercial Definition of Building Tvoes Type (Residential) or Principal Activity Commercial) Description Unless otherwise specified, this includes both attached and detached Single-Family Home .................................. bulldlnas Multi-Family Unit In Larae Buildin" ........... Apartments In bulldlnas with more than 5 units Mult~Family Unit In Small Buildlna ........... A=rtments In bulldlna with 2-4 units Mobile Home ............................................. Bulldlngs used for academic or technical classroom instruction, such as elementary, mlddle, or high schools, and dassroom buildings on college or university campuses. Buildings on education campuses for which the main use Is not classroom are included In the category relating to their use. For example, administration buildings are part of "Office," dormitories are Education .................................................. "LodgJna," and libraries are "Public Assembly." Food Sales ............................................... Bulldlnas used for retail or wholesale of food. Buildings used for preparation and sale of food and beverages for Food Service ............................................ consumotion. Health Care lnoatlent ................................ Buildings used as diagnostic and treatment facilities for inoatient care. Buildings used as diagnostic and treatment facilities for outpatient care. Docto(s or dentist's office are Included here if they use any type of diagnostic Health Care OutMtient ............................. medical Muloment (if they do not, they are cat..,,orized as an office bulldlnal. Buildings used to offer multiple accommodations for short-term or long-term Lodaina ..................................................... residents, including skilled nursing and other residential care buildinos. Retail !Other Than Malll... ......................... Buildinos used for the sale and display of goods other than food. Buildings used for general office space, professional office, or administrative offices. Doctor's or dentist's office are Included here If they do not use any type of dlegnostic medical equipment (if they do, they are categorized as an Office ........................................................ outpatient health care building). Buildings In which people gather for social or recreatlonal activities, whether In Public Assembly ....................................... Private or non-Private meetino halls. Public Order and Safetv ........................... Buildlnas used for the oreservation of law and order or ni •blic safetv. Buildings In which people gather for religious activities, (such as chapels, Relioious Worshio .................................... churches, moeu1ues, svnaaoaues, and temolesl. Buildings In which some type of service is provided, other than food service or Service ...................................................... retail sales of goods Buildings used to store goods, manufactured products, merchandise, raw Warehouse and Storage .......................... materials, or nArsonal belongings (such as self-storaqe). Buildings that are Industrial or agricultural with some retail space; buildings having several different ccmmerclal activities that, together, ccmprlse 50 percent or more of the floorspace, but whose largest single activity Is agricultural, industrial/ manufacturing, or residentlal; and all other Other ......................................................... miscellaneous buildlnqs that do not fit Into any other catMorv. Buildings In which more floorspace was vacant than was used for any single commercial activity at the time of interview. Therefore, a vacant building may Vacant ...................................................... have some occuoied floorsru:ace. 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.ela.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqft-measure.html Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS), Description of CBECS Building Types http://www.ela.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/pba9g/bldgtypes.html A\191'9 GWP (lbs C026'sq ft): Vanc:cu,,er. LawRlse"-~ A...-ge Materil!s In a ~,272-squan, fODI -UT<:020 ....... All data In blac:I,; text it!!S-ldential~perunlt Floorspace per buil(llng .a.,...,. GWP (Iba C02a'aq ft~ Vanc:ouver, low Rise Bulldlng A....-.ge Materials ir\ 1 2.272--s(luare foot slogle family home .... ,e,ffl(lt: ,.,;, ti}!" ... :,w, Embodied Emlulona Womheel SKllol'I t: R,.n.tl, Type (Resldent!al) or Prlnc:lpal AC1M1:: t;;;:::~Ln,~ Mull-Famly Unit In Smd Uoble Homa.-·----···-·· .. ····-···--.... --·· Edueatlon ············-·-···· .. ···--··-············· Food Sales --·············-······················ Food S....tce ........................................ . Health C-Inpatient ........................... . -Can, ~ (Othei'iii.i-Mall).. ... Offleo •••••••·• • --Public Order and R.,.,b rt Worship ................................. . Service ..................... . Warehause and S' Other .......................... . Vacant .. Sec:tklr'I a: P.-nent. .. ___ ........ -.... I All Types d P.-nm,t. •.•....•... Column,""'""'"" ~, 0.0 0.0 ·-aq feet/ \d.l ~ ~ ~ Ll[ 1.06 256 5.6 M ui:i ""'io.i 35.a 97 14.8 142 15.5 10.1 6.5 ~~ 21.9 14.1 -"°"" 7.8 2269.0 8.0 Lifeaplln-relatBd -GHG minions (MTC02«w '1!'!!l I :H " 991 217 217 ~ ~ 1,!!. 376 .fil ,.. 600 391 "' 654 Ml! ... .-w ... 19.1 3206.0 27.8 King Cculty. ONRP. Coruc:t: M.u Kuhanc.. matl.lWl1arkC:ldngcoun1y.gov 2001 Re$idential Ensvv CDR$lllTIPl!cln Survi:,y (N~ A~ 2001) Square foolage measurement3 and compan,ons http:!/'llnow.U.doe.P.'f~-~html life $pSI ~ ernbcdied GHG mlssU'II (MTC02ef 1housand square feet) • See calc:uldons In table below! -"'-39 39 ~ -"'-39 ~ -"'-39 ~ 39 39 ~ .!i 39 ~ 39 ~ -"'- ~ -512 :i'b5.{• 6.6 EIA. 2003 Comrncrclal Buildings~ Consumption Survey (National A~. 2003) Table C3. Consumption 8l'ld Gl'D:5S E~y Intensity far Sum of Maior Fuels for Non-MaR Buildings. 2003 http:J/WW#.ela.doel.gov/etrtfNlcboes/cb«s~detailed_lable9_2003/2003set912D03eJIG6l/c3.J® Athena ECOC::.lculator Athena Assembly Evaluation Tool v2.3-Vancouver low Rise Building Assembly Average OWP (kg) per aquate meter htlp;/,-.athenasml.Cll/t:ools/~ lbs per kg 220 Square feel per square meter 10.76 Buldlng5 Energy Data Book: T .3 Typlr;:al/Aw,rage Housenold Meteriels Used In the ConstnJdlon d • 2.272-Squere-foot Slngle,-Femly Hcxne, 2000 htlp;J/buildingsdatabercn.doo.~_book_table&Tabled)=20J6&t:m See elsO: NAHB. 2004 Houslog Facts, Fi<p'ee and Trencb. Feb. 2004, p. 7 • El;,e,-gy ir.lt,l'l\".ot,ori Ad,;llr1i,;.ba1i.lrn•.ruslf1S < h,lr,1en:ii:itit s 1•l"X• App~, e.,C...6ft-;s:!~C,r.3. Fg. !j. "'<P~, .. ~.e-i~:k-eg<,.-fpub,'~ptlot'..',,;:sV,eN. .. l:'r~!-~.~ -w ... -5.7 21.3 , ... , .... ........., Embodied --~ li050.0 3103.0 (MTC02e 1M 30.0 88.0 38.7 i>avemant Emlaalons F:n:ton MTC02erthounnd ~-feet o( asptull or ~18 paYGmeN Embodl9d GHG EmJHk>nl Buildings ~0 (SN below) Worksbtlt Baekamund Information Embodied GHG emissions are emissions that are 0'8ated through the extraction, processing, transportation, construction and disposal of building materials as well as emissions created through landscape disturbance (by both son disturbance and changes in above ground biomass). Estimating embodied GHG emissions Is new field of analysis: the estimates are rapidly Improving and becoming more inclusive of au elements of construction and dewlopment The estimate Included tn thls worksheet is calculated using average values for the main oonstructlon materials that are used to create a typical family home. In 2004, the National Association of Home Bullders cab.dated the average materials that are used in a typical 2.272 square foot slngle..family household. The quantity of materials used Is then muttiptied by the average GHG emlsslons associated with the Ufe-cycle GHG emissions for each material. This estimate is a rough and conservative estimate; the actual embodied emissions for a project are likely to be higher. For example, at this stage, due to a lack of comprehensive data, the estimate does not lndude Important factors such as landscape disturbance or the emissions associated with the interior components of a buUdlng (such as fumltufe). King County realizes that the calculations for embodied emissions in this wo~Sheet are rough. For example, the emissions associated with building 1,000 square feet of a residential buildlng will not be the same as 1.000 square feet of a commercial buUding. However, discussions with the construction community Indicate that whUe lherB are significant differences between the different types of structures. this method of estimation Is reasonable; it wm be Improved as more data become avaUable. Additionally, if more speclftc Information about the project Is known, King County recommends two onltne embodied emissions calculators that c:an be used to obtain a more taUored estimate for embodied emissions: www.btJildcarbonneutral om and www athenasml ca/tools/ecqCalculator/. Pavflment Four recent life cycle assessments of the environmental impacts of roads form the basis for the per unit embodied emissions of pavement Each study Is constructed In slightly different ways; however, the aggregate results of the reports n1present a reasonable estimate of the GHG emissk>ns that are created from the manufacture of paving matertals, construction related emissions, and maintenance of the pavement over its expected llfe cycle. For specifics, see the worksheet Special Section: Estimating the Embodied Eml11lon1 for Pavement Four recent life cycle assessments of the environmental impacts of roads tom, the basis for the per unit embodied emissions of pavement Each study Is constructed in slightly different ways; ho'N8ver, the aggregate results of the reports represent a reasonable estimate of the GHG emissions that are created from the manufacture of paving materials, construction related emissions, and maintenance of the pawment over its expected life cycle. The results of the sh.Idles ere presentBd In different units and measun,s; considerable effort was undertaken to be at»e to compan1 the results of the studies in a reasonable WB'f. For more details about the below methodology, contact natt.kuharic@klngcounty.gov. The foursttJdles. Mell (2001), Pari< (2003~ Stripple (2001) and Treolar(2001) prod.-l1JtaJ GHG errussions of4-341 MTC02e per thoosand square feet offlnlshecl paving (for similar asphalt and concrete based pavements). This estima1a does not lodudlng downstream maintenance and repair of the highway. The awrage (for aD conaete and asphatt pavements ln the studies, assuming each study gets one data point) Is -17 MTC02e/!housancl square feet Three of the stu:iles attempted to thoroughly account for the emissions assodated with long term maintsnance (40 years) of the roads. Sbipple (2001), Park. et al. (2003) and Tf90lar(2001) report 17, 81, and 68 MTC02e/thousand square faet. respectiyely, after ac:eount!ng for maintenance of the roads. Based on the above discussion, King County makes the conservative estimate that 50 MTC02e/thousand square feet of pawment (over the development's life cycle) wiU be used as the embodied emission factor for pavement until better estimates can be obtained. This Is roughly equivalent to 3,500 MTC02e per lane mile of road (assuming the lane Is 13 feet wide). It is Important to nom that these studies estimate the embodied emissions for mads. Paving that does not need to stand up to the rigors of heavy use (such as parking lots or driveways) INOUld likely use less matsrtats and hence have lower embodied emissions. Sources· Meil, J. A Life Cycle Perspective on Concrete and Asphalt Roadways: Embodied Primary Energy and Global Wanning Potential. 2006. Available: http:/fwwN.cement.ca/cement.nsf/eeeQec7bbd6301268525M£4QQ52107bffiftc7Qdc8ae03a782852572b90061 b9 14/SFJlE/AJilSOWE3/athena%20reoort%20Feb %202%202007.pdf Parlt, K, Hwang, Y., Seo, S., M.ASCE, and Seo, H. , -Ouantltatlw Assessment of Environmental Impacts on Life Cycle of Highways," Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol 129, January/February 2003, pp 25-31, (DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:1(25)). Stripple. H. Life Cycle Assessment of Road. A Pilot Study for Inventory Analysis. Second Revised Edition. 1VL S'A'edlsh Environmental Research Institute Ltd. 2001. Available: httn·1fwww.M fi8lrnppo{terlpdf/B1210E pdf Treloar, G., Love, P .E.O., and Crawford, R.H. Hybrid Life-Cycle Inventory for Road Construction and Use. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management P. ~9. January/February 2004. ~ ............ Emi"'"'ions Worksh-• Energy Floor.;pace MTCEpe consumption per Carllon per Building thousand MTC02eper Average UfespanE~ Type (ResldentJal) or Principal ActM~ building per year Coefficient for MTC02eper (thousand square feet per thousand square Building Life Related MTC02e lCommerclal lmDllon Btu Buildlnas building oer \leaf sauare feet ""'" 1ee,--Soan emissions per unit ~Ho-.............................. 107.3 0.108 11.61 2.53 4.6 16.8 57.9 an Unit in Lame Build! ....... 41.0 0.108 4.44 0.85 5.2 19.2 80.5 357 Unit In Small Buildlno ....•.. 78.1 0.108 8.45 1.39 6.1 22.2 80.5 661 Mobile Horne •.•..•.....•.•.•.••.••.•..•.•....•....•.•. 75.9 0.108 8.21 1.08 7.7 28.4 57.9 475 Education .................•........................•... 2.125.0 0.124 264.2 25.6 10.3 37.8 62.5 16.526 Food Sales ............................................ 1,110.0 0.124 138.0 5.6 24.6 90.4 62.5 8,632 Food Service ......................................... 1,436.0 0.124 178.5 5.6 31.9 116.9 62.5 11,168 Health Care In tlent ............................ 80.152.0 0.124 7,479.1 241.4 31.0 113.6 62.5 487,794 Health Care ent ......................... 985.0 0.124 122.5 10.4 11.8 43.2 62.5 7,660 Lod I ................................................. 3.578.0 0.124 444.9 35.8 12.4 45.6 62.5 27,826 Retail fOther Than Mall\ ........................ 720.0 0.124 89.5 9.7 9.2 33.8 62.5 5,599 Office .................................................... 1,376.0 0.124 171.1 14.8 11.6 42.4 62.5 10.701 Public Assemhh, ................................•.. 1,338.0 0.124 168.4 14.2 11.7 43.0 62.5 10,405 Public Order end Sat ........................ 1,791.0 0.124 =-7 15.5 14.4 52.7 62.5 13,928 Re!iaious Wor.;hin ................................. 440.0 0.124 54.7 10.1 5.4 19.9 62.5 3,422 Service .................................................. 501.0 0.124 62.3 6.5 9.6 35.1 62.5 3.896 Warehouse and Storalle ........................ 764.0 0.124 95.0 16.9 5.6 20.6 62.5 5,942 Other ..................................................... Vacant ................................................... ~ All data In black text Energy consumption for resldential buildings Energy consumptlOn for commercial buildings and Floorspace per building Carbon Coefficient for Buildings Residential floorspace per unit 3.600.0 0.124· 447.6 21.9 20.4 294.0 0.124 36.6 14.1 2.6 King County, ONRP. Contact Matt Kuharic, matt.kuharic@kingcounty.gov 2007 Buildings Energy Data Book: 6.1 Quad Definitions and Comparisons (National Average, 2001) Table 6.1.4: Average Annual Carbon Dioxide Emissions for Various Functions http://buildingsdatabook..eren.doe.gov/ Data also at: http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/recs2001_ce/ce1-4c_housingunlts2001.html EIA. 2003 Commercial Buildings Eneryy Consumption Survey (National Average. 2003) Table C3. Consumption and Gross Energy lntensily for Sum of Major Fuels for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003 http:/lv.wN.ela.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003fdetailed_tables_2003/2003set9f2003ex.ceVc3.xls 74.9 62.5 27,997 9.5 62.5 2,286 Note: Data in plum color is found ln both of the above sources (buildings energy data book and commercial buildings energy consumption survey). Buildings Energy Data Book {National average, 2005) Table 3.1.7. 2005 Carbon Dioxide Emission Coefficients for Buildings (MMTCE per Quadrillion Btu) http://buUdingsdatabook.eere.energy,govi?ld=view_book_table& Tab!etD=-2057 Note: Carbon coefficient in the Energy Daia book is in MTCE per Quadrillion Btu. To convert to MTC02e per mlllion Btu. this factor was divided by 1000 and multiplied by 44/12. 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2001 ) Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.ela.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqft-measure.html Llfespan Ene_~ Related MTC02e emissions per thousand square feet 266 422 489 448 646 1.541 1,994 1,938 737 777 577 723 733 899 339 599 352 1,278 162 average lief span of buildings, estimated by replacement time method Single Famlt Multi-Family Units All Residential Homes fn Large and Buildings Small BlDldJnos New Housing Constnlctlon, 2001 1,273,000 329.000 1,602,000 Existing Housing Stock, 2001 73,700,000 26,500,000 100,200,000 Replacemen time: 57.9 80.5 62.5 {national ~~~~------=~-~~~-~---=~ average, 2001) Note: Single family homes calcu1ation is used for mobile homes as a best estimate life span. Note: At this time, KC staff could find no reHable data for the average life span of commercial buildings. Therefore, the average Ufe span of residential buildings is being used until a better approximation can be ascertained. ~ New Housing Construction, 2001 Quarterly Starts and Completions by Purpose and Design -US and Regions (Excel} http://www.census.gov/const/quarterly_starts_completions_cust.xls See al$0: http:ltwww.census.gov/const/www/newrescQnstlndex.html Existing Housing Stock, 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) 2001 Tables HC1:Houslng Unit Characteristics. MIiiion U.S. Households 2001 Table HC14a. Housing Unit Characteristics by Type of Housing Unit. MIiiion U.S. Households, 2001 Million U.S. Households, 2001 http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recslrecs2001/hc_pdf/housunltslhc1-4a_houslngunits2001.pdf T1 ··-··--·-....... ,-. .... ... .......... ·~ ... Type (Resldentlal) or Principal Activity (Commercial Sinal&famiru Horne .................................. MuttJ..FHITIIIY Unit in L1nae Bulldnx , .......... Mutti-f:::im1N Unit In Small Buiin1nn ........... Mobile Home ............................................ Education ................................................ Food Sales .............................................. Food Service ..........•...•............................ Health care lnru:ttient ............................... Health care o tient ........................•... LodQinq .•......................•..............••..••.•..... Retail COther Toan Malll... ......................... Office •.•••.••••....•........ ; .................•............• Public Assemnn1 •••··································· Public Order and SHIP.JV ........................... Retlolous WO!Shio .................................... Service ..................................••.•.........•.... Warehouse and Stora""' .......................... Other •.....................................••••.........••.. Vacant ..................................................... ~ All data in black text # people/ unit Residential floorspace per unit # employees/!housand square feel vehicle related Life span GHG Life span transpartation emissions MTC02e/ # people or ( metric tonnes year/ # thousand employees/ C02e per thousand # people/ unit or sq feet/ unit thousand person per MTC02e/ square buildlnr or buildinc c:nuare feet =•r va:::ir/ unit feet 2.8 2.53 1.1 4.9 13.7 5.4 1.9 0.85 2.3 4.9 9.5 11.2 1.9 1.39 1.4 4.9 9.5 6.8 2.5 1.06 2.3 4.9 12.2 11.5 30.0 25.6 1.2 4.9 147.8 5.8 5.1 5.6 0.9 4.9 25.2 4.5 10.2 5.6 1.8 4.9 50.2 9.0 455.5 241.4 1.9 4.9 2246.4 9.3 19.3 10.4 1.9 4.9 95.0 9.1 13.6 35.8 0.4 4.9 67.1 1.9 7.8 9.7 0.8 4.9 38.3 3.9 28.2 14.8 1.9 4.9 139.0 9.4 6.9 14.2 0.5 4.9 34.2 2.4 18.8 15.5 1.2 4.9 92.7 6.0 4.2 10.1 0.4 4.9 20.8 2.1 5.6 6.5 0.9 4.9 27.6 4.3 9.9 16.9 0.6 4.9 49.0 2.9 18.3 21.9 0.8 4.9 90.0 4.1 2.1 14.1 0.2 4.9 10.5 0.7 King County, DNRP. Contact: Matt Kuharic, matt.kuharic@kingcounty.gov Estimating Household Size for Use in Population Estimates (WA state, 2000 average) Washington State Office of Financial Management KlmpeJ, T. and Lowe, T. Research Brief No. 47. August 2007 http1/www.ofm.wa.gov/researchbriefs/brief047.pdf Average Building UfeSn::anl 57.9 80.5 80.5 57.9 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Note: This analysis combines Multi Unit Structures In both large and small units into one category: the average Is used in this case although there is likely a difference 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2001) Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqft-measure.html transportation related GHG emissions (MTC02e/ rvor unit 792 766 766 709 9247 1579 3141 140506 5941 4194 2394 6696 2137 5796 1298 1729 3067 5630 657 Co!Tlmerclal Buildrngs Energ~· Consumption Survey commercial energy uses and costs (National Median, 2003) Table 82 Totals and Medians or Floorspace. Number of Workers, and Hours of Operation for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003 http://\Y1N1.eia.doe.gov/emeufcbecs/cbecs2003/delailed_tables_2003/2003set112003exceUb2.xls Note: Data for# employees/thousand square feet ts presented by CBECS as square feet/employee. related GHG emissions (MTC02e/ thousand sq feet 313 904 550 668 361 282 561 582 571 117 247 588 150 374 129 266 181 257 47 In this analysis employees/thousand square feet is calculated by taking the inverse of the CBECS number and multiplying by 1000. vehicle related GHG emissions Estimate calculated as follows (Washington state, 2006)_ 56,531,930,000 2006 Annual WA State Vehicle Miles Traveled Data was daily VMT. Annual VMT was 365*daily VMT. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/mapsdala/tdo/annualmileage.htm 6,395.798 2006 WA state population http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/53000.html 8839 vehicle miles per person per year 0.0506 gallon gasoline/mile This is the weighted national average fuel efficiency for all cars and 2 axle, 4 wheel light trucks In 2005. This includes pickup trucks, vans and SUVs. The 0.051 gallons/mile used here is the inverse of the more commonly known term "miles/per gallon· (which is 19.75 for these cars and light trucks). Transportation Energy Data Book. 26th Edition. 2006. Chapter 4: Light Vehicles and Characteristics. CaJculations based on weighted average MPG efficiency of cars and light trucks. http://cta.oml.gov/data/tedb26/Edltion26_Chapter04.pdf Note: This report states that in 2005, 92.3% of all highway VMT were driven by the above described vehicles. http://cta.oml.gov/dataltedb26/Spreadsheets/Table3_04.xls 24.3 lbs C02e/gallon gasoline The CO2 emissions estimates for gasoline and diesel inciude the extraction, transport, and refinement of petroleum as well as their combustion. Ufe-Cycle CO2 Emissions for Various New Vehicles. RENew Northfield. Available: http:/lrenewnorthfield.org/'wpcontent/uploads/2006/04/C02%20emlssions.pdf Note: This is a conservative estimate of emissions by fuel consumption because diesel fuel. 2205 with a emissions factor of 26.55 lbs C02e/gallon was not estimated. 4.93 lbs/metric tonne vehicle related GHG emissions (metric tonnes C02e per person per year) average lief span of buildings, estimated by replacement time method See Energy Emissions Worksheet for Calculations Commercial floorspace per unit EIA, 2003 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (National Average. 2003) Table C3. consumption and Gross Energy lntensliy for Sum of Major Fuels for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003 http:/l'#NNl.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detalled_tables_2003/2003set!l/2003exceVc3.xls XlngCowu;y !load Sammo Dmaion . llo,putm.,,\af-lioa 201Soath-- Sootdo, WA 1181 ........ TYPE OF CERTIFICATE 181 ORIGINAL D CONDITIONAi... March 23, 2007 Certlllcatll # 03072 . FIie Number. 07~19-03 &nlreS: March 23, 2008 CERTIFICATE OF TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY D Specific conditions are dcscribcd on the reverse side of this certificate. Pumwtt to King County Code, Chapter 14.70 as amended, this certificate confirms that the level of service standanl used in the 'liansportation Coneuncncy Management p10g18w has been ~ IMPOtn"ANT: This certificate does not guaranll:c a developmeot pennit. Olber 1r1111Sp01181ion lmprovomeuts and mitigation will be required to comply with lnlaseclion Slandards, Miligalion Payment System, King County road standards. and/or safety needs. I. Applicaot Name and Address: Richard Proctor 23816 1ooth Ave. SE #43, Kent, WA 98031 2. . Property Location:. a. Property Address: SE 180th St. b. Development Name: c. Pan,el Nwnber: 6186800840 3. Type of Development PennitTo Be Requested: Short Plat 4. Proposed Land Use: Slngle Family Resldantlal S. Zone Location and Reserved Units: a. Concwrency z.one: 798 Community Planning An:a: Soos Creek i. Conu11crcial Project ·Total Square Feet:' 0 ii. Mulli-fiunily -Number of Units: 0 iii. Single fiunily -Number of Units: 6 6. This Certificate is subject to the following general conditions: a. This Certificate of Concwrency runs with the. land and is lnmsferablc only to subscqucnl owners of the same property for the slated dewlopmcnt, subject to the terms, conditions and expillltioo date lisled herein. This Certificate of Concwrency is not transferable to any other.property and has no COl1llllCICial value. This Certificate Expires: March 23, 2008 unless you apply for the development permit described above, prior to that date. If this requirement is not met the King County Department of Trallsportation reserves the option to caoccl your certificate and capaci1¥ n:servation. . Wbeu yoa apply for a development permit wltll KJag Coualy'a Departmeot ofDe..iopmeat and Envlroamenbd Semas (DDES), bring Ibis Certllleab, ofTransportatlan c ............. ,:y .. part of lhe development appUratlan padlap. Hyon lunoe aoy qaestiom, pleue eaD (2116) 263-4759. Linda Dougherty, Director, Road Senicesnt\Oilim,/ Dq,a,lmw>t ofTnmspmtation King County, Washington (mrn©rn~wrn 0 FEB 2 9 2008 K.C. D.D.E.S. ' i Web date: 11/28/2007 ti King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 SUBDIVISION DENSITY & DIMENSION CALCULATIONS 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. MAIN FILE COr', File Number (To be filled in by DOES) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION WORKSHEET RELATING TO DENSITY AND DIMENSIONS Several development regulations play a role in the creation of a subdivision within King County. Determining the allowable density, minimum density, and a lot width on a piece of property can be confusing. This worksheet will assist you in correctly applying specific portions of the code and will be used to determine if a proposed subdivision or short subdivision meets the density and dimensions provisions of the King County Zoning Code (Title 21A). This worksheet is designed to assist applicants and does not replace compliance with adopted local, state and federal laws. Pre-application conferences are required prior to submittal of a subdivision or short subdivision. These conferences help to clarify issues and answer questions. They may save you both time and money by eliminating delays resulting from requests for additional information and revisions. You may call 206-296-6600 to find out how to arrange for a pre-application conference. Worksheet Prepared By: f'H I'-'-I F KI i-Z..e':, (Print Name) Subdivision Name: '-\IIL.":>CN-T~ S '"'-cc.T f'\..AT Date: 2. / S.08 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: LIR.e,.At...l, r,et,/u rt DE:N<o tTY 4 -l"2. btl/ .A£ ,7 , Zoning: _.:..IZ_-_C. ______ _ If more than one Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation or zone classification exists for the property, show the boundary between the land uses or zones and the area within each on the preliminary plat map. If a single lot is divided by a zone boundary, transferring density across zones on that lot may be permitted subject to the provisions of K.C.C. 21A.12.200. PLEASE COMPLETE ONLY THE APPLICABLE PORTIONS OF THIS FORM I. Site Area (K.C.C. 21A.06.1172) also see (K.C.C. 21A.12.080): Site area (in square feet) is the TOTAL horizontal area of the project site. ml [g © [g O w ~ (5\ FEB 2 9 ~==~ C· K.C. D.D.E.S. SubdlvDensityOimenslonCaicFORM.doc lc-cal-subden.pdf 11/28/2007 Page 1 of6 ' • Calculation: I l I a'2.. ".> s I"" Gross horizontal area of the project site i 11 • 6 'l.. ~ £;.I"'-Site area in square feet I NOTE: To continue calculations, convert site area in square feet to acres by dividing by 43,560 '2... '> "7 AC.. Site area in acres -=--'--'----=-- NOTE: When calculating the site area for parcels in the RA Zone, if the site area should result in a fraction of an acre, the following shall apply: Fractions of .50 or above shall be rounded up to the next whole number and fractions below .50 shall be rounded down. Example: If the site area in acres is 19.5 acres (less the submerged land and less the area that is required to be dedicated on the perimeter of a project site for public right-of-way) the site area can be rounded up to 20 acres. No further rounding is allowed. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.080) II. Base Density (K.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.040 tables): The base density is detennined by the zone designations(s) for the lot. (., du/acre Ill. Allowable Dwelling Units and Rounding (K.C.C. 21A.12.070): The base number of dwelling units is calculated by multiplying the site area by the base density in dwelling units per acre (from K.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.040 tables). _7..ec:_· "5.,,,_J'----site area in acres (see Section 1.) X ---'~=---base density (see Section II) = IS allowable dwelling units Except as noted below, when calculations result in a fraction, the fraction is rounded to the nearest whole number as follows: A. Fractions of .50 or above shall be rounded up; and B. Fractions below .50 shall be rounded down. NOTE: For parcels in the RA Zone, no rounding is allowed when calculating the allowable number of dwelling units. For example, if the calculation of the number of dwelling units equaled 2. 75, the result would be 2 dwelling units. Rounding up to 3 is not allowed. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.070(E).) IV. Required On-site Recreation Space (K.C.C. 21A.14.180): This section must be completed only if the proposal is a residential development if more than four dwelling units in the UR and R zones, stand-alone townhouses in the NB zone on property designated Commercial Outside of Center if more than four units, or any mixed use development if more than four units. Recreation space must be computed by multiplying the recreation space requirement per unit type by the proposed number of such dwelling units (K.C.C. 21A.14.180). Note: King County has the discretion to accept a fee in lieu of all or a portion of the required recreation space per K.C.C. 21 A.14.185. Apartments and town houses developed at a density greater than eight units per acre, and mixed use must provide recreational space as follows: 90 square feet X 170 square feet X 170 square feet X ____ proposed number of studio and one bedroom units ____ proposed number of two bedroom units + proposed number of three or more bedroom units + Recreation space requirement = SubdlvDensityOlmenslonCalcFORM.doc lc-cal-subden.pdf 11/28/2007 Page 2 of 6 i Required On-site Recreation Space Continu1:u Residential subdivisions, townhouses and apartments developed at a density of eight units or less per acre must provide recreational space as follows: 390 square feet X _ ___,8-,,e____ proposed number of units = ~1 120 Sr Mobile home parks shall provide recreational space as follows: 260 square feet X ______ proposed number of units = V. Net Buildable Area (K.C.C. 21A.06.797): This section is used for computing minimum density and must be completed only if the site is located in the R-4 through R-48 zones and designated Urban by the King County Comprehensive Plan. The net buildable area is the site area (see Section I) less the following areas: _____ areas within a project site which are required to be dedicated for public rights-of-way in excess of sixty (60') of width + -n., , ~O critical areas and their buffers, to the extent they are required by King County to remain undeveloped + areas required for above ground stormwater control facilities including, but not limited to, retention/detention ponds, biofiltration swales and setbacks from such ponds and swales + ~. I :LO areas required by King County to be dedicated or reserved as on-site recreation areas. Deduct area within stormwater control facility if requesting recreation space credit as al.lowed by K.C.C 21A.14.180 (see Section IV) + regional utility corridors, and + . other areas, excluding setbacks, required by King County to remain undeveloped = , '5" €)«.0 Total reductions , Calculation: __._l_._l._,I ,1--· _,.e,"i.cc-,~-site area in square feet (see Section1) = = 7s.0s-o >< .,,., "· 8'2- Total reductions Net buildable area in square feet NOTE: convert site area is square feet to acres by dividing by 43,560 Net buildable area in acres VI. Minimum Urban Residential Density (K.C.C. 21A.12.060): The minimum density requirement applies only to the R-4 through R-48 zones. Minimum density is determined by multiplying the base density in dwelling units per acre _(see Section JI) by the net buildable area of the site in · acres (see Section V) and _then multiplying the resulting product by the minimum density percentage from the K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table. The minimum density requirements may be phased or waived by King County in certain cases. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.060.) · Also, the minimum density requirement does not apply to properties zoned R-4 located within the rural town of Fall City. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.030(B)12.) Calculation: = C. base density in du/ac (see Section II) X O. 8 l. Net buildable area in acres (see Section V) . S'S X minimum density % set forth in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 or as adjusted in Section VII --~4~-minimum dwelling units required SubdlvDensltyDlmenslonGalcFORM.doc lc-cal-subden.pdf 11/28/2007 Page 3 of 6 VII. Minimum Density Adjustments for Moderate Slopes (K.C.C. 21A.12.087): Residential developments in the R-4, R-6 and R-8 zones may modify the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 based on the weighted average slope of the net buildable area of the site (see Section V). To determine the weighted average slope, a topographic survey is required to calculate the net buildable area(s) within each of the following slope increments and then multiplying the number of square feet in each slope increment by the median slope value of each slope increment as follows: 1,,;,-,-=, sq. ft 0-5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value.= + _____ sq. ft 5-10% slope increment X 7.5% median slope value= + -----+ _____ sq. ft 10-15% slope increment X 12.5% median slope value= + -----+ _____ sq. ft 15-20% slope increment X 17.5% median slope value= + -----+ _____ sq. ft 20-25% slope increment X 22.5% median slope value = _____ + + _____ sq. ft 25-30% slope increment X 27.5% median slope value= _____ + + _____ sq. ft 30-35% slope increment X 32.5% median slope value = _____ + + -----sq. ft 35-40% slope increment X 37.5% median slope value = + -----~S'. '"17<:, Total square feet ' in net buildable area _.,.8 ... ~..c.__~=--Total square feet adjusted for slope Calculation: __,6"-',:,,c.,_::_ __ total square feet adjusted for slope divided by ~'S, C.:,7, total square feet in net buildable area = O .&-4., weighted average slope of net buildable area = "'2.. ,; % (Note: multiply by 100 to convert to percent -round up to nearest whole percent) Use the table below to determine the minimum density factor. This density is substituted for the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table when calculating the minimum density as shown in Section VI of this worksheet. Weighted Average Slope of Net Minimum Density Factor . .. Bulldable Area(s) of Site: ... 0% -less than 5% 85% 5% -less than 15% 83%, less 1.5% each 1 % of average slope in excess of 5% 15%-less than 40% 66%, less 2.0% for each 1% of average slope in excess of 15% EXAMPLE CALCULATION FOR MINIMUM DENSITY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MODERATE SLOPES: + 10,000 + 20,000 + + + ·+ .+ 750 + 2,500 + _____ + _____ + + -----+ ----- + ... _____ sq. ft 0-5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value = --'-'"'-"-''-=---sq. ft 5-10% slope Increment X 7.5% median slope value= _-=:='-=---sq. ft 10-15% slope increment X 12.5% median slope value= _____ sq. ft 15-20% slope increment X 17.5% median slope value = _____ sq. ft 20-25% slope Increment X 22.5% median slope value = -----sq. ft 25-30% slope increment X 27.5% median slope value = _____ sq. ft 30-35% slope increment X 32.5% median slope value = _____ sq. ft, 35-40% slope Increment X 37.5 % median slope value= --"'"'-"-''-=---Total square feet 30,000 in net buildable area 3,250 Total square feet adjusted for slope 3,250 Total square feet adjusted for slope divided by 30,000 Total square feet in net buildable area = .108333 Weighted average slope of net buildable area = 11 % (Note: multiply by 100 to convert to percent -round up to nearest whole percent) Using the table above, an 11 % weighted average slope of net buildable area falls within the 5% -less than 15% range which has a minimum density factor of 83%, less 1.5% for each 1 % of average slope in excess of 5%. Since 11 % is 6% above 5%, multiply 6 times 1.5 which would equal 9%. Subtract 9% from 83% for an adjusted minimum density factor of 74%. This replaces the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table. SubdlvDensltyDlmenslonCalcFORM.doc lc-cal-subden.pdf 11/28/2007 Page4ofe· I VIII. Maximum Dwelling Units Allowed (K.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.040): This section should be completed only if the proposal includes application of residential density incentives (K.C.C. 21A.34) or transfer of density rights (K.C.C. 21A.37). Maximum density is calculated by adding the bonus or transfer units authorized to the base units calculated in Section Ill of this worksheet. The maximum density permitted through residential density incentives is 150 percent of the base density (see Section II) of the underlying zoning of the development or 200 percent of the base density for proposals with 100 percent affordable units. The maximum density permitted through transfer of density rights is 150 percent of the base density ( see Section II) of the underlying zoning of the development. _____ base density in dwelling units per acre see (Section II) X 150% = maximum density maximum density in dwelling units per acre X site area in acres = maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density incentives (K.C.C. 21A.34) _____ base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section II) X 200% = maximum density _____ · maximum density in dwelling units per acre X site area in acres = maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density incentives with 100 percent affordable units (K.C.C. 21A.34) base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section II) X 150% = maximum density maximum density in dwelling units per acre X site area in acres = maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density transfers (K.C.C. 21A.37) Calculation: + + ______ base allowable dwelling units calculated in Section Ill ______ bonus units authorized by K.C.C. 21A.34 ______ transfer units authorized by K.C.C. 21A.37 ______ total dwelling units (cannot exceed maximum calculated above) IX. Minimum Lot Area For Construction (K.C.C. 21A.12.100): Except as provided for nonconformances in K.C.C. 21A.32: A. In the UR and R zones, no construction shall be permitted on a Jot that contains an area of Jess than 2,500 square feet or that does not comply with the applicable minimum Jot width, except for townhouse developments, zero-lot-line subdivisions, or lots created prior to February 2, 1995, in a recorded subdivision or short subdivision which complied with applicable Jaws, and; B. In the A, F, or RA Zones: 1. Construction shall not be permitted on a Jot containing less than 5,000 square feet; and 2. Construction shall be limited to one dwelling unit and residential accessory uses for lots containing greater than 5,000 square feet, but Jess than 12,500 square feet. (K.C.C. 21A.12.100) SubdivDensityDimensionCalcFORM.doc lc-cal-subden.pdf 11/28/2007 Page 5 of 6 ; • X. Lot Width (K.C.C. 21A.12.050(B)): Lot widths shall be measured by scaling a circle of the applicable diameter within the boundaries of the lot as shown below, provided than an access easement shall not be included within the circle. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.050). I • 30 Feet L-. ·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-· Lot Width Measurement Lot WidU, Circle I • I I • ·-·-·-·-·-·- Check out the DOES Web site at www.klngcounty.gov/permlts SubdlvDensityDlmensionCalcFORM.doc lc-cal-subden.pdf 11/28/2007 Page 6of 6 t'1 Klng·County Department of Development and Envlronmnntal Servlees 900 na~esdele Ave.nut soutt,west Renton. w .. hingt011 99051-5212 206•296•6600 TTY 206·296•7217 '· W~b d;iite: 0011,lli!DOi' WAIVER REQUEST FOR REQUIREi5] PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE (R~qull'i!d prior to llllng a Land Use Application) For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. -----------------------------. - Pre-Ap.plication Waiver Request -Land Use Permit The Director or designee-may waive the requirement for a pre..application conference If It ls determined to be unnecessary for review of an application. PLEASE PRINT ALL INFORMATION BELOW. Date 1... 1.021 King County Activity Number A01f'Fote PermitType 4H:PF-1" $~i,.01v1~101J -e i..ori; Project Name __,\.V~l -=-'-"""~-"o.:..~...L./..,_T.,_tz.t.N'-'--=-=----·--"s..:.;MeR.:=-=-:t"-Pl.A,:c...:..;...::~-'------------ Site Address (v~~ Applicant's Mailing Address n e,~~ L2.C>T\-\ AVE. Applicant's Rationale for Waiver: MAIN FILE COPY Based on the rationale noted above, I agree to waive the required p~applicath>n conference, which has been determined to be unnecessary for filing an applica io Date. Check out the DDES Web site .at www.ktnqc9u11tv.apv/parmi(s lAr,ndLJM.Pre·A!>ConferenceWelve,ReQFORM,OOC PDi,t, ar 1 \OJ~ © ~ Q ~ g{Q) LJU FEB 2 9 2008 K.C. o.o.E.S. ~ ~ I ' !-,,_. .. I ! L j ! j i I . ' ' . ! CRITICAL AREAS . DETERMINATION. REPORT · For · · WHson Construction Site .. · 17844 120th Avenue SE · Renton, Washington 98055. Prepared for:· Ed,Wilson:Construction. · 17844 120*:AveriuilSE. Renton, Washington 980550 425-253-6008 - MAIN FILE. . .. . . CQpy Prepared by: Ecological Land Se~ices, Inc. 1157. · 3rd Avenue; Suiie 220 Lohgview, Washington 98632 . 360:S7.8.1371 . ELS #1587.01 May 29, 2007 K.C. D.D.E.S .. • f ~.._ •• SIGNATURE PAGE The information and data in this report were compiled and prepared under the supervision and direction of the undersigned. ~ /(Aryll,AAefY ~eeComwell iologist TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1. SITE DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 1 METHODS ................................................................................................................... 2 VEGETATION ...................... : ..................................................................................... 3 WETLAND AB ............................................................................................................ 3 WETLAND CD ............................................................................................................ 3 WETLAND E ............................................................................................................... 3 WETLAND F ............................................................................................................... .4 WETLAND HI ............................................................................................................. .4 WETLAND J ............................................................................................................... .4 WETLAND K ............................................................................................................... 5 SOILS ........................................................................................................................... 6 HYDROLOGY ............................................................................................................. 7 WETLAND AB ............................................................................................................ 7 WETLAND CD ........................................... , ................................................................ 7 WETLAND E ............................................................................................................... 8 WETLAND F ................................................................................................................ 8 WETLAND HI .............................................................................................................. 8 WETLAND J ................................................................................................................ 8 WETLAND K ............................................................................................................... 9 UNNAMED TRIBUTARY I ............................................................................................ 9 UNNAMED TRIBUTARY 2 ............................................................................................ 9 BIG Soos CREEK ........ ~ ............................................................................................... 9 CRITICAL AREA INVENTORIES ........................................................................ 10 NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY ........................................................................... 10 KING COUNTY CRITICAL AREA INVENTORY ............................................................. I 0 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................ 10 WETLANDS AND AQUATIC AREAS ............................................................................ 10 WETLAND CATEGORIZATION AND BUFFER REQUIREMENTS ..................................... 11 AQUA TIC AREA CATEGORIZATION AND BUFFER REQUIREMENTS ............................ 11 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................... 13 Ed Wilson Construction Wilson Construction Site -i - Ecological Land Services, Inc. May 29, 2007 LIST OFT ABLES Table 1. Mapped soil types ........................................................................................... 7 Table 2 .. Summary of on-site critical areas ................................................................. 12 FIGURES Figure I Figure 2 · Figure 2A Figure 2B Figure 2C Figure2D Figure2E Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 5A Figure 6 Vicinity Map Site Map Overview Site Map Cowardin Vegetation Classes (North) Cowardin Vegetation Classes (South) Hydroperiods (North) Hydroperiods (South) Soil Survey Map National Wetlands Inventory Map King County Critical Areas Map Basin and Groundwater Conditions Map DNR Stream Typing Map PHOTOPLATES Photoplate 1 Photos 1-4 Photoplate 2 Photos 5-8 Photoplate 3 Photos 9-12 Photoplate 4 Photos 13-16 APPENDICES Appendix A Routine Onsite Wetland Determination Data Forms Appendix B Western Washington Wetland Rating Forms Ed Wilson Construction Wilson Construction Site Ecological Land Services, Inc. May 29, 2007 -II - INTRODUCTION Ecological Land Services, Inc. (ELS) conducted a critical areas assessment for the Wilson Construction site located at 17844 I 20th Avenue SE in the City of Renton, Washington (Figure !). The Wilson Construction site is located within a portion of Section 33, Township 23 North, Range 5 East of the Willamette Meridian and can be identified by parcel numbers 282305-9012, 332305-9025, 332305-9021, 332305- 9058, 332305-9059, 332305-9048, 332305-9070, 619660-0520 and 619660-0540 (Figure 2). This report summarizes the findings of the critical areas assessment according to the King County Code (KCC), Chapter 2JA.24 Critical Areas (2006). SITE DESCRIPTION The Wilson Construction site is comprised of nine irregularly shaped, adjoining parcels which cover approximately 20 acres (Figure 2). The northern portion of the property is located south of SE Petrovitsky Road, which provides site access via a gated gravel road that extends north to south through approximately two-thirds of the site. The eastern portion of the site is located adjacent to, and is accessed by, the western extent of SE 178th Street. The southern portion of the property extends to 180th Street SE, which provides access to the southern portion of the site and the western portion of the property is located east of I 18th Avenue SE. The subject site is zoned R6 and is likewise surrounded by R6-zoned residential properties. The site contains approximately four existing residential homes; one located in the northern portion of the property, one located in the eastern portion of the property and two located in the south and west-central portions of the property. Various portions of the site have been cleared and/or filled in the past, especially those areas within close proximity to the gravel road and existing homes. Ed Wilson lives in the southern portion of the site and operates the Wilson Construction Company from an adjacent building. Additional portions of the property are used for the storage of large trucks and other construction related equipment (Photos 15 & 16). The vegetated portions of the site are partially comprised of forested areas located on the southwestern, southeastern and northeastern limits of the site (Figures 28 and 2C). The remaining vegetated portions of the site contain shrub-and/or emergent- dominant vegetation types. Ed Wilson Construction Wilson Construction Site -I - Ecological Land Services, Inc. May 29, 2007 METHODS ELS followed the Routine Determination Method for delineating wetlands according to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and the Washington State Department of Ecology, Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (1997). The Routine Determination Method examines three parameters-vegetation, hydrology, and soils-to determine if wetlands exist in a given area. · Hydrology is critical in determining what is wetland but is often difficult to assess because hydrologic conditions can change periodically (hourly, daily, or seasonally). Consequently, it is necessary to determine if hydrophytic vegetation and hydric soils are present, which indicate that water is present for long enough duration to support a wetland plant community. By definition, wetlands are those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands are regulated as "Waters of the United States" by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), "Waters of the State" by the Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE) and locally by King County in Chapter 21A.24 Critical Areas of the KCC. ELS conducted field visits on March 20 and 21, 2007 to determine the location of any . critical areas on or within close prnximity to the site boundaries. ELS staff located and flagged 7 wetlands and the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of 3 streams within the site boundaries. The on-site wetlands were flagged with consecutively numbered, florescent pink flagging labeled "Wetland Boundary" and can be referred to as Wetlands AB, CD, E, F, HI, J and K (Figure 2A). To verify the wetland boundaries, vegetation, hydrology, and soil data were collected from paired test plots (Appendix A). The wetlandcupland boundaries were primarily determined by changes in topography and hydrology; vegetation and soils were used as secondary indicators. The OHWM of the on-site portions of streams were flagged with consecutively numbered florescent orange flagging, florescent pink pin flags or florescent pink "Wetland Boundary" flags. In areas where the OHWM was difficult to define, due to the absence of a well defined stream channel and/or the presence of surrounding wetlands (Wetland CD, Wetland HI and portions of Wetland F), the approximate locations were documented and shown on the site map, but not field-flagged. The flagged critical area boundaries were subsequently surveyed in March 2007 by Informed Land Surveying. Ed Wilson Construction Wilson Construction Site -2 - Ecological Land Services, Inc. May 29, 2007 VEGETATION Wetland AB Wetland AB is a forested, scrub-shrub and emergent wetland located on the western portion of the property. The dominant vegetation recorded along the northern wetland boundary includes black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera ssp. trichocarpa, FAC), red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea ssp. sericea, FAC), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis var. spectabilis, FAC+), Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis, FACU), and sword fem (Polystichum munitum, F ACU). Lesser quantities of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACW) and trailing blackberry (Rubus ursinus ssp. macropetalus, FACU) are present as well. The adjacent uplands are dominated by a mix of shrubs and trees. The overstory is dominated by red alder (A/nus rubra, FAC), black cottonwood, big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum, FACU) and Western red cedar (Thuja plicata, FAC). The dominant understory species are Indian plum and vine maple (Acer circinatum, FAC-) with lesser quantities of dovefoot geranium (Geranium mo/le, N/D present as well. The uplands in the larger vicinity of Wetland AB consist of species such as big leaf maple, Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armenicus, FACU}, red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa ssp. pubens, FACU), vine maple, an unidentified species of bentgrass (Agrostis sp.), Canada bluegrass (Paa compressa, FACU+), common dandelion (Taraxcicum officinale, FACU), stinging nettle (Urtica dioica ssp. gracilis var. /ya/Iii, FAC+}, creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens var. repens, FACW) and small bedstraw (Gallium trifidum, FACW). Wetland CD The on-site extent of Wetland CD is located along the central portion of the western site boundary. Wetland CD contains forested, scrub-shrub and emergent vegetation. The dominant tree species observed within the wetland test plot is red alder and the dominant shrub species is Indian plum. Secondary co-dominant species of shrubs are salmonberry and vine maple. Slough sedge (Carex obnupta, OBL) and lady fem (Athyriumfelixx-femina var. cyclosorum) are the co-dominant herbaceous species .. The adjacent uplands contain Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii, FACU) trees with Indian plum, salmonberry, Himalayan blackberry and trailing blackberry in the shrub canopy. Sword fem is the dominant herbaceous species within the understory. Wetland E Wetland E, an emergent and scrub-shrub wetland, is located on the northwestern portion of the site. The dominant species of plants observed along the eastern Ed Wilson Construction Wilson Construction Site -3 - Ecological Land Services, Inc. May 29, 2007 .. l !. wetland boundary consist of Sitka willow (Salix sitchensis; FACW), Pacific ninebark (Physocarpus capitatus, FACW-), and salal (Gau/theria shallon, FACU). Although only a trace quantity of reed canarygrass is present within the sampled test plot, it is the dominant herbaceous species within Wetland E. The plant species observed adjacent to the northern boundary of Wetland E include common snowberry (Symphoricarpos a/bus var. /aevigatus, F ACU), Sitka willow, Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius, FACU) and trailing blackberry. Wetland F Wetland F is a forested, scrub-shrub and emergent wetland located in the northeast of the site. Black cottonwood is the dominant overstory species. Vine maple, salmonberry and Indian plum, are present within the mid-understory and slough sedge and sword fem comprise the herbaceous understory. The uplands north of the upland test plot also have black cottonwood as the dominant species of tree, with red alder as a subordinate. Vine maple and Indian plum are the dominant shrubs and Pacific bleeding heart and sword fem are the noteworthy herbaceous species. Wetland HI Wetland HI is a scrub-shrub and emergent wetland located along the eastern site boundary. Trailing blackberry occupies a significant portion of the low shrub- understory and creeping buttercup is the dominant herbaceous species. The upland plant species observed north of the wetland boundary include trailing blackberry, black hawthome (Crataegus douglasii, FAC) and Himalayan blackberry. Wetland J Wetland J is a scrub-shrub and emergent wetland located on the southeastern portion of the site. The dominant vegetation in the sampled plot are Sitka willow, common velvetgrass (Holcus /anatus, FAC), creeping buttercup, soft rush (Juncus effusus, F ACW) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus, FAC). Red top (Agrostis alba, var. alba, FAC) is present in lesser quantities. The uplands south of the wetland test plot mainly consist of weedy species of grasses and forbs. Red top, Kentucky bluegrass (poa pratensis, F AC) and common velvetgrass are the dominant species of pasture grasses. The dominant forbs are Broadleaf plantain (Plantago major, FACU+), common dandelion and creeping buttercup. Ed Wilson Construction Wilson ·construction Site -4 - Ecological Land Services, Inc. May 29, 2007 ,, Wetland K Wetland K is located in the southeast comer ofthe site. The wetland contains scrub- shrub and emergent vegetation with patches of forest overstory along portions of the wetland-upland boundary. Pacific willow (Salix lucida var. /asiandra, F ACW+) and Douglas spiraea (Spiraea douglasii, F ACW) are the dominant shrubs observed in the wetland test plot located. Other herbaceous species include red top, creeping buttercup, dovefoot geranium and soft rush. Red top and hairy cat's-ear (Hypochaeris radicata, FACU), were the dominant · species observed in the upland located west of the delineated wetland boundary. The indicator status, which follows the common and scientific names on the data forms, indicates how likely a species is to be found in wetlands. Listed from most likely to least likely to be found in wetlands, the indicator status categories are: • OBL (obligate wetland) -occur almost always (estimated probability >99%) under natural conditions in wetlands. • FACW (facultative wetland) -usually occur in wetlands (estimated probability 67%-99%), but occasionally found in non-wetlands. • FAC (facultative) -equally likely to occur in wetlands or non-wetlands (estimated probability 34%-66%). • FACU (facultative upland) -usually occur in non-wetlands (estimated probability 67%-99%), but occasionally found in wetlands (estimated probability I %-33%). • UPL (obligate upland) -occur almost always (estimated probability >99%) under natural conditions in non-wetlands. • NI (no indicator) -insufficient data to assign to an indicator category. • A plus sign ( +) after the indicator status category means that the plant is more likely to be adapted to wet conditions than the category indicated. A minus sign (-) means the plant is less likely to be adapted to wet conditions than the category indicated. Please refer to Figures 2B and 2C to review the mapped Cowardin vegetation classes and Appendix A to review the included test plot data sheets. Ed Wilson Construction Wilson Construction Site -5 - Ecological Land Services, Inc. May 29, 2007 SOILS The USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) website maps the following on-site soils: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AgB) with O to 6 percent slopes, Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AgC) with 6 to 15 percent slopes and Seattle . muck (Sk) with Oto I percent slopes by the (2007; Table I; Figure 3). The Alderwood series are made up of moderately well drained soils on uplands which formed under conifers in glacial deposits. The Alderwood AgB soils are nearly level and undulating and the Alderwood gravelly sandy loam AgC soils are described as rolling. The Seattle mucks are described as very deep and very poorly drained soils located in depressions in. river valleys and on glacial till plains. These soils formed in herbaceous and woody organic deposits. The Seattle mucks (Sk) are included on the Hydric Soils list for Snoqualmie Pass Area, Washington (2007). Mapped hydric soils do not necessarily mean that the area is a wetland-hydrology, wetland vegetation, and hydric soils must all be present to classify an area as wetland. Because of localized micro-variations in topography and hydrology, wetlands may be found in areas where hydric soils have not been mapped by the soil survey. The evaluated soils in Wetland AB consist of very dark brown (IOYR 2/2) organic muck (Appendix A). The soils in Wetland CD are black (IOYR 2/1) gravelly loam. The soils sampled in Wetland E range from very dark brown (IOYR 2/2) sandy loam to dark yellowish brown sandy loam with strong brown redoximorphic concentrations. Soils in Wetland Fare very dark brown (IOYR 2/2) clay loam and very dark grayish brown clay loam (IOYR 3/2) with dark yellowish brown redoximorphic concentrations (IOYR 3/6). The soils observed in Wetland HI are very dark (IOYR 2/2) and dark brown (IOYR 3/3) gravelly loams. Wetland J contains very dark gray (IOYR 3/l) sandy clay loam and dark yellowish brown (IOYR 3/4) sandy gravelly loam. The soils in Wetland K consist of dark brown (IOYR 3/3) gravelly loam and dark grayish brown (IOYR 4/2) gravelly clay loams with yellowish red redoximorphic concentrations. The dominant sampled upland soils range from very dark brown (IOYR 2/2) sandy and gravelly sandy loams to yellowish brown (I OYR 5/8) gravelly and gravelly sandy loams to very dark grayish brown (I OYR 3/2) clay, silty or sandy loams. Other co- dominant soils are dark yellow brown (I OYR 3/4 and 4/4) sandy, gravelly and cobbly loams and brown (IOYR 3/4 & 4/3) and dark brown (IOYR 3/3) gravelly loams. Ed Wilson Construction Wilson Construction Site -6 - Ecological Land Services, Inc. May 29, 2007 Table 1. Maeeed soil trees. Soil Map Unit Drainage Taxonomic Hydric Classification Status 1 AgB Alderwood gravelly sandy moderately well mesic Vitrandic non-hydric loam, 0 to 6 percent drained Durochrepts AgC Alderwood gravelly sandy moderately well mesic V itrandic hydric loam, 6 to 15 percent drained Durochrepts Sk Seattle muck very poorly mesic Hemic hydric drained Medisaprists 1 USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) 2007 HYDROLOGY The boundaries of seven wetlands and three streams were located and delineated within the site boundaries (Figure 2A). The on-site wetlands are depressional inflow and outflow wetlands; each being relatively or closely associated with one of the .three streams. Hydrology on the site generally appears to be supported by seasonal stream overflow and seasonally poor soil drainage conditions. Wetland AB Wetland AB, located on the western portion of the site, is a depressional inflow- outflow wetland. The wetland is oriented west to east and occupies 0.19 acres (8,226 square feet) on-site. An unnamed seasonal tributary (Unnamed Tributary I) to Big Soos Creek inflows through a culvert which surfaces in the south central portion of Wetland AB. The portions of wetland north of the culvert outlet contain small areas of surface inundation that appear to be supported by groundwater infiltration. The portions of wetland adjacent to and down gradient of the culvert have a greater quantity of surface water ponding.and are hydrologically influenced by the seasonal stream. Wetland CD Wetland CD is a depressional inflow-outflow wetland located along the central portion of the western site boundary. The on-site area is 0.02 acres (943 square feet) and the majority of the wetland is located off-site to the west. The wetland receives the majority of its hydrology from the unnamed seasonal tributary that outflows from Wetland AB. The unnamed tributary inflows to a southern off-site portion of the depressional wetland; and outflows to a culvert located on the wetland's eastern ori- site boundary. Additional hydrology appears to come from overland flows (from the Ed Wilson Construction Wilson Construction Site -7 - Ecological Land Services, Inc. May 29, 2007 ' west and north) during heavy precipitation coupled with seasonally poor soil drainage conditions. Wetland E The on-site portion of Wetland E is 0.55 acres (24,076 square feet) and is located in the northwest corner of the site. The depressional inflow-outflow wetland is oriented north to south within a large topographic depression. Big Soos Creek flows through the southern portion of the wetland and is responsible for the majority of the wetland hydrology. Secondary hydrology appears to come from poor soil perm_eability during the rainy months. A culvert located at the southern end of the wetland channels seasonal surface water to the south. The culvert extends under the gravel road that bisects Wetlands E and F and is the only surface water connection between them. Wetland F Wetland Fis a depressional stream associated wetland located in the north.east portion of the site. The wetland extends off-site to the north and east and occupies 1.34 acres (58,409 square feet) on-site. Big Soos Creek inflows to the west side of the wetland via the culvert that outflows Wetland E. The stream flows through the wetland to the south and then east, flowing off-site at the eastern property boundary. The wetland is located in the same large topographic depression as Wetland E and primarily receives hydrology from seasonal overbank flooding and secondarily from seasonally poor soil drainage conditions. The wetland generally contains areas of surface inundation adjacent to the stream channel and saturated soils along the outer wetland boundary. Wetland F can be best described as a depressional inflow-outflow wetland with a stream influence. Wetland HI Wetland HI is a depressional stream associated inflow-outflow wetland located in the east central portion of the site. The wetland occupies 0.16 acres (7,120 square feet) on-site. The majority of wetland hydrology comes from surface water via a culvert that inflows (from Wetland CD) at the wetland's western end. Wetland hydrology is . generally maintained by the seasonal stream (Unnamed Tributary 1) flowing through the central portion of its small topographic depression. The depressional wetland · outflows off-site to the east into a second unnamed seasonal tributary (Unnamed Tributary 2) of Big Soos Creek. Wetland J Wetland J is located in the southeastern portion of the site in a man-made topographic depression. The 0.22-acre (9,699 square feet) depressional wetland receives inflow via two culverts and a manmade ditch that channels surface water outflows from Ed Wilson Construction Wilson Construction Site -8 - Ecological Land Services, Inc. May 29, 2007 Wetland K located to the south. Wetland hydrology is supported by surface water inflow from Unnamed Tributary 2 which enters the wetland's southern boundary and outflows at its northern boundary. Wetland K Wetland K, a 0.59-acre (25,525 square feet) wetland, is located in a topographic depression in the southeast comer of the property. The depressional wetland receives surface water inflow (Unnamed Tributary 2) from a culvert located on the western boundary. The wetland outflows through a second culvert located on the northern boundary. Wetland hydrology stems from the surface water inflow and from the seasonally poor soil drainage conditions. Unnamed Tributary 1 An unnamed seasonal tributary of Big Soos Creek, referred to as Unnamed Tributary I, outlets from a buried culvert located on the south central portion of Wetland AB (Figure 2A). The seasonal stream continues eastward, outflowing Wetland AB. The stream then flows off-site to the north and inflows to an off-site portion of Wetland CD. The stream then flows east, back onto the site, and outflows (from Wetland CD) into a culvert located under the central portion of the site. The stream then outflows through a culvert into Wetland HI. The stream flows east through Wetland HI and outflows off-site before merging with . a second unnamed tributary (Unnamed Tributary 2) to Big Soos Creek. Unnamed Tributary 2 Unnamed Tributary 2 emerges from a culvert inflow to the southwest portion of Wetland K (Figure 2A). The seasonal stream outflows to a culvert located at the northern end of Wetland K. The stream flows north through a manmade ditch and a second culvert and inflows to Wetland J. The stream then outflows through two culverts located side by side at the north end of Wetland J. The seasonal stream continues flowing north and at this point flows within a well-defined channel. South of Wetland HI, Unnamed Tributary 2 flows eastward where it merges off-site with Unnamed Tributary I. Big Soos Creek Big Soos Creek enters the site at the northwest property comer. (Figure 2A). The stream inflows to Wetland E and continues to the southeast where it outflows to a culvert located under the gravel road that bisects Wetlands E and F. Big Soos inflows to Wetland F through the culvert and continues flowing southeast. As the stream meanders eastward Unnamed Tributary 2 merges into Big Soos Creek. Big Soos Ed Wilson Construction Wilson Construction Site -9 - Ecological Land Services, Inc. May 29, 2007 • flows through the central portion of Wetland F and continues off-site to the northeast · at the eastern property boundary. CRITICAL AREA INVENTORIES National Wetland Inventory . The National Wetlands Inventory (NW!) does not show any mapped wetlands or streams located within the site boundary (Figure 4). NW! maps are typically used to gather wetland information about a region and because of the large scale used for regional mapping are limited in accuracy for localized analyses. In this case ELS' field observations differ from the NW! map in that ELS identified seven depressional wetlands and three streams not mapped by the NWI. King County Critical Area Inventory The King County GIS Critical Areas Inventory maps a Sensitive Areas Ordinance (SAO) wetland in the same location where ELS staff delineated Wetland K (Figure 5). The County map also shows a designated I 00-year floodplain in the approximate locations of the ELS-delineated boundaries for Wetlands E and F. The County map shows Big Soos Creek, depicted by the "stream" line designation and also shows a mapped SAO stream, identified as a Class 2 Salmonid stream, in the vicinity of Unnamed Tributary I. ELS field investigation coincides with the County mapped data for Unnamed Tributary I, Big Soos Creek and Wetland K; however, ELS located Wetlands E and F in the areas mapped as I 00-year floodplain. In addition, ELS staff located Wetlands AB, CD, HI and Jin addition to those indicated on the GIS County map. CONCLUSIONS Wetlands and Aquatic Areas Seven wetlands (labeled Wetlands AB, CD, E, F, HI, J and K) and three streams (Unnamed Tributaries I and 2, and Big Soos Creek) were identified and delineated during the critical areas review of the property. The wetland and stream boundaries were subsequently surveyed by Informed Land Surveying. The wetland boundaries were primarily determined by topographical changes and the presence of hydrology; secondary consideration was given to the presence and location of hydrophytic vegetation and hydric soils. The on-site wetlands are dominated by facultative wetland (FACW) and facultative (FAC) species. The Ed Wilson Construction Wilson Construction Site -IO - Ecological Land Services, Inc. May 29, 2007 sampled wetland soils generally contain low chromas, sometimes coupled with distinct redoximorphic concentrations as positive indicators ofhydric soil conditions. The upland areas adjoining the wetlands are dominated by facultative upland (FACU) and facultative (FAC) species of trees, shrubs and herbs. The evaluated upland soils have relatively higher chromas than the wetland soils and lack the presence of redoximorphic concentrations coupled with low soil chromas as observed in some of the sampled wetland plots. Wetland Categorization and Buffer Requirements Wetlands AB and F are forested, scrub-shrub and emergent depressional inflow and outflow wetlands. Both rate as Category II wetlands by the Washington Department of Ecology Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (2006; Table 2; Appendix A). Wetland AB will have a required JOO-foot buffer and Wetland F will have a required 125-foot buffer based on habitat scores of 19 and 23, respectively, per the KCC 21A.24.325 (2006). Wetlands CD and K are forested, scrub-shrub and emergent depressional inflow-outflow wetlands. Wetlands CD and K rate as category III wetlands and will have a 75:foot required buffer based on their habitat scores of 18 and 15, respectively. Scrub-shrub and emergent Wetlands E, HI and J also rate as Category III wetlands and based on their habitat scores (Wetland E-14, Wetland HI- 17, Wetland J-15) will also have required 75-foot buffers. Aquatic Area Categorization and Buffer Requirements Big Soos Creek is documented as a Type F water by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) (Figure 6; 2007). Type F waters can be summarized as being either fish bearing or as having fish potential. The two unnamed tributaries to Big Soos Creek are considered Type F waters as well. Each of the three Type F streams will have a required 115-foot buffer width based on the site's location within the King County Urban Growth Area (Table 2; KCC 2JA.24.358). Ed Wilson Construction Wilson Construction Site -11 - Ecological Land Services, Inc. May 29, 2007 , Table 2. Summarv of On-Site Critical Areas. Critical Area On-site Area Cowardin (acres) Class 1 Wetland AB 0.19 F/SS/E Wetland CD 0.02 F/SS/E Wetland E 0.55 SS/E WetlandF 1.34 F/SS/E Wetland HI 0.16 SS/E Wetland J 0.22 SS/E WetlandK 0.59 F/SS/E Unnamed ---- Tributary 1 Unnamed ---- Tributary 2 Big Soos ---- Creek ' . ---Cowardm et al. 1979, F-forested, SS-scrub-shrub, E=emergent 1 KCC 2/A.24.3/8 and 2/A.24.355 'KCC 2/A.24.325 and 2/A.24.358 Local Buffer Width Classification 2 (feet)3 II 100 III 75 III 75 II 125 III 75 III 75 III 75 TypeF 115 TypeF 115 TypeF 115 We base the above listed conclusions on standard scientific methodology and best professional judgment. In our opinion, the conclusions should agree with local, state, and federal regulatory agencies. However, it should be considered a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and used at your own risk until it has been reviewed and approved in writing by the appropriate regulatory agencies. Ed Wilson Construction Wilson Construction Site -12 - Ecological Land Services, Inc. May 29, 2007 REFERENCES Cowardin, L.M., C. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS-78/31. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Washington D.C. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Hruby, T. 2006. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington - Revised Annotated Version. Pub!. #04-06-025. Washington State Department.of Ecology. King County Code (KCC). 2006. Chapter 21A.24 Critical Areas. King County, Washington. King County GlS. 2005. King County iMap Property Information. Online document < http://www.metrokc:gov/gis/Mapportal/iMAP _about.htm#>. Accessed April 2007. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2007. Web Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington. Online documents <http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda. gov/app/W ebSoilSurvey .aspx> and <http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/ Manuscripts/W A633/0/wa633 _text.pdt>. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Accessed April 2007. Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1995. Hydric Soils for Washington. Online document < http://www. wa.nrcs. usda.gov/technical/soils/county _ hydric _lists. html>. Accessed April 2007. Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Pub!. #96-94. Olympia, Washington. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 2003. Salmonscape. Online document <http://www. wdfw. wa.gov/mapping/salmonscape/index.htm l>. Accessed April 2007. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). Wetlands Digital Data. Online document < http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/NWI/index.html>. Accessed April 2007. Ed Wilson Construction Wilson Construction Site -13 - Ecological Land Services, Inc. May 29, 2007 • Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR). 2007. Washington Forest Practices Water Type Map. Online document< http://www3.wadnr.gov/dnrapp5/ website/tpars/viewer.htm>. Accessed April 2007. Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR). 2006. Washington Forest Practices Rules Chapter 222-16 WAC. Online document < http://www.dnr.wa. gov/forestpractices/rules/wac222-I 6.pdt>. Accessed May 2007. Ed Wilson Construction Wilson Construction Site -14 - Ecological Land Services, Inc. May 29, 2007 • WASHINGTON eJ 47• 26' 33" N Latitude 122• 10' 43" W Longitude LOCATION MAP R6E • r 83 N J I • PROJECT I!!--t: T .mi VICINITY MAP r----1......._ . . ' '-- 0 ; LEGEND: :a' 800 I I I SCALE IN FEET . ·-- Property Boundary Parcels 1600 I OATE :05-29-07 OWN: BCB REQ . BY :JC PRJ . MGR:JC 1157 3rd Ave., Suite 220 Longvtew, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414-9305 CHK: APPR : PROJ .#:1587.01 -. , ................ ---J ----,I NOTE: Base map provided by King County at web address: http://www.metrokc.gov/gls Figure 2 SITE MAP OVERVIEW WIison Construction Site Ed WIison King County, Washington Section 33, Township 23N, Range SE, W.M. 4/13/2007 4:12 PM S:\Klng-WA\County-ProJects\ 1587 -Ed WIison Construction\ 1587 .01-Wllson Construction Site\ 1587 .01-Flgurea\ 1587.01-SM Overvlew-052207.dwg br1an ..... .... -~ . --···, L;:____j -~ ........ '\ -----..: Approximate Wetland Boundary/Unsurveyed .....la.--'"-t--r"" Approximate Wetland Boundary/Unsurveyed 0 150 Wetland E Category III 24,076 sf.; 0 .55 ac . Big Soos Creek Type F Stream Wetland CD Category III 943 sf.; 0 .02 ac. (On-site) Unnamed Tributary 1 Type F Stream Wetland AB Category II 8,226 sf.; 0 .19 ac . (On-site) I ... ... I ----- _ .. ,f- --- TP-1 • ) < 300 ~I _1...---1 I I SCALE IN FEET 1157 3rd Ave ., Suite 220 Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414 -9305 DATE : 08-15--07 OWN: JJT/BCB REQ . BY:JC PRJ . MGR:JC CHK: APPR: PROJ .#:1587 .01 Wetland HI Category III 7,120 sf.; 0.16 ac . (On-site) ... ... ... ... ... Big Soos Creek Type F Stream Unnamed Tributary 2 Type F Stream Wetland J Category III 9,699 sf.; 0 .22 ac . Wetland K Category III 25,525 sf.; 0.59 ac. (On-site) Approximate Culvert Location " LEGEND: Property Boundary Wetland Wetland Buffer Stream Stream Buffer Test Plot Location Culvert Location \ NOTE: Type F Stream mapped by Department of Natural Resources provided on-line at web address : http://www3.wsdnr.gov/dnrapp5/websltelfpsrslvlewer.htm Figure 2A SITE MAP WIison Construction Site Ed WIison City of Renton, King County, Washington Section 33, Township 23N, Range SE, W.M. 4/13/2007 4 :12 PM S:\Klng-WA\County-Projecta\1587-Ed Wilson Constructlon\1587 .01 ·Wllaon Construction Slte\1587.01-Flgures\1587.01 _SM2_081507.dwg br1an ' L ••. : l LEGEND: NOTE : Site continues south Property Boundary Wetland ~ · · · -Stream with Flow Dlrectlon >~--.... < Culvert Location 0 80 __ ..;. .___I _I I i SCALE IN FEET 1157 3rd Ave ., Suite 220 Longview, WA 98632 (360) 5 78-1 3 71 Fax: (360) 414-9305 160 I DA TE : 05-29-07 OWN : JJT/BCB REQ . BY:JC PRJ . MGR:JC CHK : APPR: PROJ .#:1587 .01 NOTES: Cowardln Vegetation Classes: F -Forested SS -Scrub/Shrub E -Emergent 1. Aerial photo provided by Google Earth Pro™ 2007. 2. Map depicts Cowardln vegetation classes per Western Washington Rating form numbers D 1.3, R 1.2, R 3.1, R 3.2, L 1.2, L 3, S 1.3, H 1.1 , and H 1.4. Figure 2B COWARDIN VEGETATION CLASSES (NORTH) WIison Construction Site Ed WIison City of Renton , King County, Washington Section 33, Township 23N , Range 5E, W.M. 4/13/2007 4:12 PM S:\Klng-WA\County-Projects\1587-Ed WIison Constructlon\1 587 .01 -Wllson Construction Slte\1587.01 -Flgures\1587 .01-Coward ln-052207.dwg brla n ' ] Il n n ·1 :1 l J r1 L ··1 I: I r· 1 .J LI ' l il a ] j" j 0 100 200 j ~ 1-•. --, SCALE IN FEET LEGEND: Property Boundary Wetland ~ · · · -Stream with Flow Direction ) ( Culvert Location 4/13/2007 4 :12 PM S:\Klng-WA\County-Projec:ts\1587-Ed WIison Construdion\1587.01-Wilson Construction Site\1587.01-rigures\1587.01-Cowardin-052207.dwg brian Cowardin Vegetation Classes: F -Forested SS -Scrub/Shrub E-Emergent NOTES: 1. Aerial photo provided by Google Earth Pro TM 2007. 2. Map depicts Cowardin vegetation dasses per Western Washington Rating form numbers D 1.3, R 1.2, R 3.1, R 3.2, L 1 .2, l 3, S 1.3, H 1.1, and H 1.4. i . ::> ~ 0 ~ Cl) --w Cl) "' Wa> CG> Cl)~ .9 a, Cl) Cl) C) C <(_ c: CG ...J § :ca:: o013c"' -Nz;:,g~~ G>Qb=>N ~-"'~2=-0. C)~ 8C: "O C j:: u:~ w:,u, ..... WC O C C!)O 0~ w "' g>~ >~ --z ~~ C C a:: _g ~ ~ 0 Cl) 0 .... i OQ NCD-. •• ,bo .. a: 0 ....: CIO It) om>-e> ·· •• CD;:E •. lt; Wt . :ii: a:-. ~:idi~~rR:~ ooa:o..o<o.. u ~ N m \0 ao "' Olo i; t! ~6 C \0 om ...J~ ~~ NY. .,_ .!::: ,..._ :, m .,.__ .. I ~~ < "' -0 ....... ~o m'° .....~ "" ,. I .___ Wetland CD Category II1 943 sf.; 0.02 ac. (On-site) 0 ; 176THSTSE LEGEND: Wetland E Category m 24,076 sf.; 0.55 ac. NOTE: Site continues south Property Boundary Wetland ~ .. · -Stream with Flow Direction )~--..i1.( Culvert Location 80 160 t I 1 ' SCALE IN FEET 1157 3rd Ave ., Suite 220 Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414 -9305 DATE : 05-29-07 OWN: JJT/BCB REQ . BY:JC PRJ . MGR:JC CHK: APPR: PROJ.#:1587.01 /"'•'""''"-, ~ ....... . ~ .___,. NOTES: . . ...... -~ ---' Approximate Wetland Boundary/Unsurveyed Wetland HI Category III 7,120 sf.; 0.16 ac. (On-site) Hydroperlods: Wetland F Category II 58,409 sf.; 1 .34 ac . (On-site) -Stream Flowing In or Adjacent to [/>~ ·j Seasonally Ponded gm Saturated Only 1. Aerial photo provided by Google Earth Pro™ 2007 . 2. Map depicts hydroperlods per Western Washington Wetland Rating form numbers D 1.1, 1.4, and H 1.2. Figure2D HYDROPERIODS (NORTH) WIison Construction Site Ed WIison City of Renton, King County, Washington Section 33, Township 23N, Range 5E, W.M . 4/13/2007 4:12 PM S:\Klng-WA\County-Projecta\1587 -Ed WIison Constructlon\1587 .01 -Wllson Construction Slte\1587.01-Flgures\1587.01 -Hydroperiods-052207.dwg brian -: : ! ; j :1 n n r•, _j ] n fl i~J l-'; ~·.1 : .J ' ;l .... ·-.. u Ll a a r'·] i, ,.-:..: .. u ; .._ ~ .... 0 100 200 I • i-... • SCALE IN FEET LEGEND: WeUandAB Category II 8,226 sf.; 0.19 ac. (On-site) ----Property Boundary WeUand ~ · · · -Stream with Row Direction ) ( Culvert Location ~ NOTE: Site continues north _, - -- Hydroperiods: -- -Stream Rowing in or Adjacent to ~ Seasonally Ponded Mm Saturated Only 4/1 'J/2007 4:12 PM S:\King-WA\Comty-Projec::\1587 <d Wison Construdk>n\1587.01-Wlson Construction Site\1587 .01-Agures\1587.01-Hydroperiods-0527.dwg brian NOTES: Wetland J Category Ill 9,699 sf.; 0.22 ac. WeUandK Category m 25,525 sf.; 0 .59 ac. (On-site) 1. Aerial photo provided by Google Earth Pro,... 2007. 2. Map depicts hydroperiods per Western Washington Wetland Rating form numbers D 1.1 , 1.4, and H 12 . ~ ~ ui -It) ~ G) CG) ~ .9 Ol Cl) O> C 0 .£ ~ "'5 ..ca: --C a:, -WCl)o o tUZ NC2!!l~<"> G>Q--N :5 -~ ~ .?;-.Q. C>0:: 0 "O C ..C ~W()w:::,a:, Q. C 8 S Oo ~ 0:: 0) g>~ ~~ ~<'? J: <") C 0 11 Cl) ,... .,.... Q O 0 dl O..., ,...: NCO-,.. :g J,o .. a:: .,.... om>-C> .. •• ID;:E •• 'II, ~to-.:iidEo <~wa::::cn.a: ooa::n.o<n. u z N ,,, IO CIO v, °' 0 i; t! ~:!: .§~ 0 .. N~ N"-•-~ ...... ::, ,,, vi- -I ~~ <"' -us ~IO ,ar~~ I ! I ~ I J 0 ~ i I 8 I ' ~ I i 8 i " ~ j f ! :ii: i I I- co SITE 175TH ~ .. --l_8~{i_T=H-'--:r:-· . --'-r----'--'-~:..C. I= co 1.-. mt74IH ... · r- C'\J. r. 1 7B1r1 0 Cl No wetlands on-site indicated by US Fish & Wildlife Service. NOTES: 1. Map provided on-line by US Fish & Wildlife Service at web address: http:llwww.wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/NWl/index.html 2. Map not to scale. Property boundary size and location approximate. 18tS "'-------------... ~ Figure 4 "' ~ .; j 1157 3rd Ave., Suite 220 Longview, WA 98632 "' (360) 578-1371 fa,c (360) 414-9305 ~ ------------- DA TE: 05-29-07 DWN: BCB REQ. BY:JC PRJ. MGR:JC CHK: APPR: PROJ.#: 1587.01 NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP Wilson Construction Site Ed Wilson King County, Washington Section 33, Township 23N, Range SE, W.M. -~ ( t----~~-.f\ ~ ill I :, 0 i I--,~~~~-- 300 _ __;_ LEGEND: JI Class 1 I" Class 2 Perennial I" Class 2 Salmonid ;v Class 3 : · · Unclassified Q2J Lakes and Large Rivers ;./ Streams 600 ~ = = m • • _____.__ .. ' \ II.· ..... -\,._ _.,.......,i--\ Floodway 100 Year Floodplain SAO Wetland \'--1--JJ Sensitive Area Notice on Title Drainage Complaints t " ~ SCALE IN FEET NOTE: Base map provided by King County at web address: http://www.metrokc.gov/gis "' ........ -------------, ::! a. "' ~ ~ g ~ 1157 3rd Ave .• Suite 220 Longview, WA 98632 (360)S78-1371 Fax:(360)414-9305 ~ .... __________ _, DATE: 05-29-07 DWN: BCB REQ. BY:JC PRJ. MGR: JC CHK: APPR: PROJ.#:1587.01 Figure 5 CRITICAL AREAS MAP Wilson Construction Site Ed Wilson King County, Washington Section 33, Township 23N, Range 5E, W.M. ; I '1 C 8 ;;: ! ~ (I) ~ "' !: .... 0 j LEGEND: CAO Tributary Basins ·· , : , Upper Tributary Basins 300 600 I '-=I SCALE IN FEET I 8 ~ 1157 3rd Ave., Suite 220 Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414-9305 ~ .... __________ _. LEGEND: Basin Condition -Medium LEGEND: Areas Susceptible to Groundwater Contamination -Low -Medium NOTE: Base map provided by King County at web address: http:llwww.metrokc.gov/gis DATE: 05-29-07 OWN: BCB REQ. BY:JC PRJ. MGR:JC CHK: APPR: PROJ.#: 1587 .01 Figure SA BASIN & GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS MAP Wilson Construction Site Ed Wilson King County, Washington Section 33, Township 23N, Range 5E, W.M. II SITE ! LEGEND: F I Stream Water Type S,F,Np,Ns ; j [ C: 8 <( t Photo 1 Looking southwest at stream emergence from culvert into Wetland AB. Photo 3 Looking east at culvert outlet at eastern extent of Wetland CD. ~-...------------gi; "' -;,; I 1157 3rd Ave., Suite 220 Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414-9305 ~ .... ____________ __, DATE: 05-23-07 OWN: BCB REQ. BY:JC PRJ. MGR:JC CHK: APPR: PROJ.#: 1587 .01 Photo 2 Looking west at Wetland AB. Photo 4 Looking north at Wetland CD. Photoplate 1 SITE PHOTOS Wilson Construction Site Ed Wilson King County, Washington Section 33, Township 23N, RanQe 5E, W.M. Photo 5 Looking southeast at culvert outlet in Wetland E. Photo 7 Looking at culvert inflow in northeast portion of Wetland F. Photo 6 Looking north at eastern boundary of Wetland E. Photo 8 Looking south at stream channel in Wetland F. Photo 9 Photo 10 Looking east at stream channel In Wetland F. Looking east at inundated portion of Wetland F. Photo 11 Photo 12 Looking west at Wetland HI. Looking east at Wetland HI. Photo 13 Looking north at stream flowing Into Wetland J. Photo 15 Looking north from the cleared portion of the site along the central portion of the western boundary. Photo 14 Looking south at Wetland K. Photo 16 Looking northeast from the cleared portlon of the site along the central portlon of the western boundary. I r ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. ------------ Proiect Site: Wilson Construction Annlicant/Owner: Ed Wilson Construction Test Plot Location: Upland (in disturbed area near SW nron. line) Do normal circumstances exist at the site? Is the site sie:nlficantly disturbed (atvnlcal situation)? Is the site a Potential oroblem area? VEGETATION (Strata: tree, sapling1 shrub, woody vine, herb) Dominant Plant Sl!ecies Date: 1157 3rd Avenue, Suite 220, Longview, Washington 98632 (360)578-1371 FAX (360)414-9305 DATA FORM -Routine Onsite Wetland Determination 1987 COE Wet1ands Delineation Manual 1997 Washington State Delineation Manual 3(}.0/07 I Pro;ect#, 1587.01 Countv/State: Kinl!IWA Sec1fown/Ran2e: Sec. 33m3N/R3E 181Yes 1 1No PlotID, TPI 0Yes 181No Comniunitv ID: -- Oves 181No Transect ID: -- Common Name Scientific Name Strata % Cover Indicator Status I. •BiJt Leaf Manle Acer macrovhvllum 2. •Himalayan blackberry Rubus armenicus 3. •Bentarnl:ll:l srv-.r.jes · ,farostis SD. 4. Common dandelion Tarnxacum omcinale s. Canada btu·e~ Poa comnressa 6. Himalavan blackberry 'Rubus armenicus 7. 8. Other species present: % of dominant species OBL, FACW, FACW-, FAC+, FAC ,1J1, Remarks:•= dominant species per the 50/20 rule. I/3 = 33% HYDROLOQY Recorded data available? D Yes 181 No Is it the growing season? 0 Yes D No Is site inundated? D Yes 0 No Depth of surface water: WA Depth to free water in pit: WA Depth to saturated soils: WA Remarks: no h drolo is resent SOILS, Map Unit Name: (A~) A]derfil!~ grnvejly :;andy )Qam 6-1 s~ §!oR~. (Series and Phase) Taxonomy (Subgroup): m~ic Yil:randic Qurochrcri~ Field observations confirm ma'pped soil type? 181Yes 0No Profile Descriotion Denth finches) Horizon Matrix color Mottle Color 0-5 . IOYR2/2 5-16 IOYRS/8 ff}'.drjc Soil Indicators D D D D Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Dominant? Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soil Present? Remarks: Name: J. Cornwell Histosol (-ists) Histic Eplpedon (8-16") Sulfidlc Odor Aquic Moisture Regime 0Yes 0Ycs 0Yes 181No 0No 18JNo . . Tree 40 FACU Shrub 25 FACU Herb 70 FAC Herb IS FACU Herb 10 FACU+ Herb s FACU . (more than 50% required) Vevetation Criteria Met? 0Yes [81No Type(s), Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators D Inundated D Saturated< 12 in. D Water Marks 0 Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits D Drainage Patterns Drainage Class: Mottle Abundance (few. common, manv) . Secondary Indicators (2 required) 0 Oxidized Root Channels< t 2in. bgs D Local Soil Survey Data 0 Water Stained Leaves 0 FAC-Neutral Test 0 Other (Explain in remarks) Hydrology Criteria Met? 0Yes [8JNo D Excessively Drained D Somewhat Excessively Drained D Well Drained 181 Moderately Well Drained D Somewhat Poorly Drained 0 Poorly Drained D Very Poorly Drained Mottle Size Tu!.!Yll ffme. med coarse) sandv loam . '"avcllv loam U Reducing Conditions D Organic Streaking in Sandy Solis D G.leyed or Low Chroma Colors D Organic Pans D Mg or Fe Concretions 0 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D High Organic Content In D Other (explain in remarks) Layer of Sandy Soils Soils Criteria Met? Oves0No Is test lot within a wetland? 0Ye, 18JNo Sheet_l of 11 ECOLOGICAL LAND SEJRVMCES, liNC. ---------------...__ Proiect Site: Wilson Construction A"'"licanUOwner: Ed Wilson Construction Test Plol Location: Unland (area of recd canarv~rass N. of off-site house) Do normal circumstances exist at the site? Is the site siPnificantlv disturbed fatv11ical situation)? Is the site a DOtential oroblem area? VEGETATION (Strata: tree, sapling, shrub, woody vine, herb) Dominant Plant S(!ecies Common Name Scientific Name I. •Himalavan blackbern• Rubus armenicus 2. •reed cana""' .......... SS Phalaris arundinacea 3. small bedstraw Gallium tri/idum 4. Himalavan blackbem• Rubus armenicu.r 5. creenina buttercun Ranunculus reDens var. r"nens 6. - 7. 8. Other species present:trace quantities of red elderberry and English ivy Date: 1157 3'd Avenue, Suite 220, Longview, Washington 98632 (360)578-1371 FAX (360)414-9305 DATA FORM -Routine Onsite Wetland Detennination 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual 1997 Washington State Delineation Manual 3/20/07 I Proiect #: 1587.01 Countv/State: KinPIWA Sec/fown/Ram~e: Sec. 33m3N/RJE ~Yes 0No Plot ID, TP2 0Yes 1X1No Communitv ID: -· 0Yes ~No Transect ID: .• Strata % Cover Indicator Status Shrub 35 FACU Herb 60 FACW Herb 15 FACW Herb 15 FACU Herb 10 FACW -- - - % of dominant species OBL, FACW, FACW-1 FAC+, FAC ,iQj:', (more than SO% required) Remarks: • :c: dominant species per the 50/20 rule. 1 /2 + 50% HYDROLOGY Recorded dat,a available? D Yes ISi No Is it the growing season? ISi Yes D No Is site inundated? D Yes ISi No Depth of surface water: NIA Depth to free water in pit: NLf. Depth to saturated soils: lliA Remarks: SOILS, Map Unit Name: (Ag!:;:) Aldecw~ gr~veJly §aady loam, Q-lJ~ 6Joge~ (Series and Phase) Taxonomy (Subgroup): m~ic Vitrandjc Durn~hreg!§; Field observations confirm mapped soil type? ~Yes0No Profile Descrirition De(!th finches) Horizon Matrix color Mottle Color 0-14 14-16 Hydric §oil Indicators D D D D Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Dominant? Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soil Present? Remarks: Name: J. Cornwell IOYR 3/2 lOYR 4/4 Hlstosol (-ists) Hlstic Eplpedon (8~16") Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime 0Yes 0Ycs 0Yes ISINo ISINo ISINo D D D D Ve2etation Criteria Met? 0Yes [8'.INo Type(s), Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators D Inundated 0 Saturated< 1 i in. D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits 0 Drainage Patterns Drainage Class: Mottle Abundance ffew common. manv) - - Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Mg or Fe Concretions High Organic Content in Layer of Sandy Soils Secondary Indicators (2 required) D Oxidized Root Channels< I 2in. bgs D Local Soil Survey Data D Water Stained Leaves D FAC-Neutral Test D Other (Explain in remarks} Hydrology Criteria Met? 0Yes [8JNo D Excessively Drained D Somewhat Excessively Drained D Well Drairied 0 Moderately Well Drained D Somewhat Poorly Drained D Poorly Drained D Very Poorly Drained Moit1e Size Texture (fine, med coarse) -siltv loam cobb]v loam D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Organic Pans ~ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Other (explain in remarks) Soils Criteria Met? 0Yc.s ISINo Is test lot within a wetland? 0Ycs Sheet_, of 11 1]-:; n fl d fj r1-i rJ .. !J '·_1·· :'. ;, n u , l (: L. u ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. ----------- Proiect Site: Wilson Construction Annlicant/Owner: Ed Wilson Construction Test Plot Location: Unland fin draina11:e area\ Do normal circumstances exist at the site? Is the site siPnificantlv disturbed <atunical situation)? Is the site a notential nroblem area? VEGETATION (Strata: tree, sapling, shrub, woody vine, herb) Dominarit Plagt S9ecles Common Name Scientific Name I. •ornamental Maanolia Maenolia sc,. 2. •ttimalavan blackb....-rv Rubus annenicus 3. red·elderbe'rrv Sambucus racemosa 4. vine manic Acer circinatum 5. •HimaJa,10.n blackb....-rv RubU$ armenicus 6. stinoina nettle Urtica dioica ssn. vracilis var. lvallii 7. 8. Other species present: Date: I 157 Yd Avenue, Suite 220, Longview, Washington 98632 (360)578-1371 FAX (360)414-9305 DATA FORM -Routine Onsite Wetland Determination 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual 1997 Washington State Delineation Manual 3/20/07 I Proiect #: 1587.01 Countv/State: King/WA Secffown/Ran2e: Sec. 33m3N/R3E 181Ye, 0No Plot ID: TP3 1 1ves 181No Communltv ID: .. Yes 181No Transect ID: ·• Strata o/o Cover Indicator Status Tree 60 Shrub 50 FACU Shrub 15 FACU "Shrub 15 FAC- Herb 50 FACU Herb 5 FAC+ o/o of dominant species OBL, FACW, FACW-, FAC+, FAC ~ (more than 50% required) Remarks: •"'dominant species per the 50/20 rule. 0/3 + 0% HYDROLOGY Recorded dati a.vailable? ·is it the growing season? Is site inundated? Depth of surface water: Depth to free water in pit: Depth to saturated soils: Remarks: SOILS: 0 Yes ·181 Yes 0 Yes lliA lliA NIA 181 No 0 No 181 No Map Unit Name: (,6gB) aldern::ood gravJIJ'. §and~ loam, 0-~% ~lo~es (Series and Phase) Taxonomy (Subgroup): mesic Vitrandic Q~r~hr~~ Field obse,:vations confirm mappe·d soil type? 181Yes 0No Profile Descrlntion De(!th (inches) Horizon Matrix color Mottle Color 0-10 . IDYR 2/2 10-16 . IOYR 5/8 Hydric Soll Indicators D Histosol (-isls) · D Hlstic Epipedon (8-16") D Slllfidic Odor D Aquic Moisture Regime Remarks: organic debris present within upper IO" WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Dominant? Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soil Present? Remarks: Name: J. Cornwell 0Yes 0Yes 0Yes 181No 181No 181No . . D D D D Veaetation Criteria Met? 0Yes t8]No Type(,): Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators D Inundated D Saturated< 12 in. D Water Marks D Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits 0 Drainage Patterns Drainage Class: . Mottle Abundance (few. common; manv\ . . Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Mg or Fe Concretions HICh Organic Conlent in Layer of Sandy Soils Secondary Indicators (2 required) D Oxidized Root Channels< 12in. bgs 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 Water Stained Leaves 0 ·FAC-Neutral Test 0 Other (Explain in remarks) Hydrology Criteria Met? 0Yes [8JNo LJ Excessively Drained D Somewhat Excessively Drained D WeJI Drained 181 Moderately WeU Drained D Somewhat Poorly Drained D Poorly Drained D Very Poorly Drained Mottle Size ~ 'Hn,. med coarse) sandv loam . 11ravel1v loam D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Organic Pans D Listed on Local Hydric '.soils List D Other (explain in remarks) Soils Criteria Met? 0Yes 181No Is test nlot within a wetland? 0Yes 181No Sheet]. of l1 ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. ------------ Proiect Site: Wilson Construction A•mlicanUOwner: Ed Wilson Construction Test Plot Location: Unland (north of Wetland AB) Do normal circumstances exist at the site? Is the site sienificlintl\' disturbed (atvnical situation)? Is the sile a potential problem area? VEGETATION (Strata: tree, sapling, shrub, woody vine, he,·b) Dominant Plant Snecies Common Name Scientific Name I •red alder A/nus rubra 2. •black cottonwood Pooulus balsamifern ssv. trichocarl)a 3. bi~ leaf maple Acer macronhvllum 4. Western red cedar Thuia plicata 5. •Indian plum Oemleria cerasi(ormis 6. •vine maole Acer circinatum 7. •sword fem Polvsticum munitum 8. dovefoot v:eranium Geranium molle Other species present: Date: J 157 3•d Avenue, Suite 220, Longview, Washington 98632 (360)578-1371 FAX (360)414-9305 DATA FORM -Routine On site Wetland Determination J 987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual 1997 Washington State Delineation Manual 3/20/07 I Proiect #: 1587.01 County/State: Kin"1 wA Secrrown/Ra nee: Sec. 33n'23N/RJE i:8JYes 0No Plot ID: TP4 I IYt.s i:8JNo Communitv ID: -- 0Yc, [8JNo Transect ID: -- Strata o/o Cover Indicator Status Tree 30 FAC Tree 15 FAC Tree 10 FACU Tree 5 FAC Shrub 20 FACU Shrub 15 FAC- Herb 60 FACU Herb 5 UPL '~1 of dominant species OBL, FACW, FACW-, FAC+, FAC 40% (more than 50% required) Remarks:•= dominant species per the 50/20 rule. 2/5 = 40% HYDROLOGY Recorded data available'? D Yes [8J. No Is it the growing season? 0 Yes D No Is site inundated? D Yes t8J No Depth of surface water: Wt, Depth to free water in pit: Wt, Depth to saturated soils: Wt, Remarks: no h drolo is resent SQ!!&: Map Unit Name: (Agg Alderwood gravelly ll;8!]dy loam 6-15%: ~loges (Series and Phase) Ta:xonomy (Subgroup): mesic Vitrandic DurQcl:fregts Field observations confirm mapped soil type? i:8JYes 0No Profile Descrintion Deuth (inches) Horizon Matrix color Mottle Color 0-5 . 10YR2/2 5-16 . 10YR5/8 H)'.dric ~oil Indicators D Histosol (-lsts) D Histic Epipedon (8-16") D SulOdic Odor D Aquic Moisture Regime Remarks: soils in upper 5" have organic debris mixed in with sandy loam. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Dominant? Wetland-Hydrology Present? Hydric Soil Present? Remarks: Name: A. Allison 0Yes 0Yes 0Yes [8JNo i:8JNo i:8JNo D D D D Veeetation Criteria Met? nves [BlNo Type(s): Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators D Inundated D Saturated< 12 in. D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits 0 Drainage Patterns Drainage Class: Motile Abu!!dancc (few, common. manv) ~educing Conditions Gleyed or. Low Chroma Colors Mg or Fe Concretions High Organic Content in Layer of Sandy Soils Secondary Indicators (2 required) D Oxidized Root Channels< 12in. bgs D Local Soil Survey Data · D Water Stained Leaves D FAC-Neutral Test D Other (Explain in remarks) Hy~rology Criteria Met? 0Yes t8JNo ~ Excessively Drained Somewhat Excessively Drained D Well Drained [8J Moderately Well Drained D Somewhat Poorly Drained D Poorly Drained D Very Poorly Drained Mottle Sjze Texture <fine. med. coarse) . sandv loam m-avellv sandy loam D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Organic Pans t8J Listed on Local I-lydric Soils List D Other (explain in remarks) Soils Criteria Met? nves C8JNo ls test lot within a wetland? Yes 0No Sheet~ of 11 fl ~ r: ···1 L n [I I . I .. I : I ,., ' I LI fl " f] t !] L ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, l!NC. ----------------i:s::::: Proiect Site: Wilson Construction Annlicant/Owner: Ed Wilso.n Consh·uction Test Plot Location: Welland AB fon N side) Do normal circumstances exist at the site? Is the site slt11nificantlv disttirbed (atunical situatiOnl? Is the site a notential nroblem area? VEGETATION (Strata: tree, sapling, shrub, woody vine, herb) Dominant Planl S:l!ecies ·Common Name Scienti{ic Name 1. *black cottonwood Pooulus balsami(era sso. trich'ocnrnn 2. •red OSier do11wood Cornus sericea sso, Sen'cea 3. •salmonbc ...... , Rubus snectabilis var. spectnbi/is 4. Indian olum Oemleria cerasiformis 5. •sword fem Polvstichum munitum 6. 7. 8. Date: 1157 Yd Avenue, Suite 220, Longview, W~shington 98632 (360)578-1371 FAX (360)414-9305 DATA FORM -Routine Onsite Wetland Determination 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual 1997 Washington State Delineation Manual 3/20/07 I Proiect #: 1587.01 Countv/State: Kin~A Sec/fown/Ran@e: Sec. 33m3N/R3E 181Yes 1 1No Plot ID: TP5 .. 1 •Yes 181No Communitv ID: .• I IYes 181No Transec1 ID:" -- Strata % CoVer Indicator Status Tree 40 FAC Shrub 30 FAC Shrub 25 FAC+ Shrub 5 FACU Herb 2 FACU - -- -- Other species present:trace quantities of reed canarygrass and trailing blackberry are present as well. % of dominant species OBL, FACW, FACW-, FAC+, FAC :zu. Remarks: ••dominant species per the 50/20 rule. 3/4 = 75% HYDRQLOGY Recorded data available? D Yes 181 No Is it the growing season? 181 Yes D No Is site inundated? 181 Yes D No Depth of surface water: <I" Depth to free water in pit: surface Depth to saturated soils: surface Remarks: SOILS: Map Unit Name: (Ag!:) Ald~wood &[avelly sandy }Qam, 2· l So/g sjogSj (Series and Phase) Taxonomy (Subgroup): mesic Yitrandjc Qurocl:]regts Field obs~rvations confirm mapped soil type? 0Yes 181No Profile Descrlotion Denth (inches} Horizon Matrix color Mottle Color 0-16" -lOYR 2/2 - Hydric Soil Indicators D Ristosol (-ists) D Hlstic Eplpedon (8-16") D Sulfidic Odor D Aquic Moisture Regime Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytlc Vegetation Dominant? t8JYes 0No Wetland Hydrology Present? [8]Yes 0No HydrlcSoil Present? [8JYes 0No Remarks: Wetland parameters have been met· Name: A Alljson (more than SOo/o required) D D D D Ve1Jetation Criteria Met? t8'JYes 0No Type(s): Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators [8'J Inundated l8J Saturated< 12 in. D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits D Drainage Patterns Drainage Class: Mottle Abundance (few, common, manv) - Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Mg or Fe Concretions High Organic Content in Layer of Sandy Soils Secondary Indicators (2 required) D Oxidized Root Channels< 12ln. bgs D Local Soil Survey Data D · Water Stained Leaves 0 FAC-Neutral Test D Other (Explain in remarks) Hydrology Criteria Met? r81Yes 0No D Excessively Drained D Somewhat Excessively Drained D Well Drained 181 Moderately Well Drained D Somewhat Poorly Drained D Poorly Drained D Very Poorly Drained Mottle Size Texture (fine-mf:d. coarse) -ornanic muck D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Organic Pans 181 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Other (explain in remarks) Soils Criteria Met? 181Yes 0No ls test lot within a wetland? 181Yes 0No Sheet2 of ll ECOLOGICAJL !LAND SERVICES, INC. ----------------------- Proiect Site: Wilson Construction A"'"'licant/Owner: 6d Wilson Construction Test Plot Location: Wetland CD I south side) Do normal circumstances exist at the site? Is the site SiP"nlOcantlv disturbed (atunical situation)? Is the site a notential nroblem area? VEGETATION (Strata: tree, sapling, shrub, woody vine, herb) Dominant Plant Sgetig Date: 1157 3rd Avenue, Suite 220, Longview, Washington 98632 (360)578-1 371 FAX (360)414-9305 DATA FORM -Routine Onsite Wetland Determination 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual 1997 Washington State Delineation Manual 3120107 I Proiect # : 1587.01 Cou·ntv/State: Kine/WA Secffown/Ran11e: Sec. 33ff23NIRJE Yes 0No Plol ID: TP6 0Yes l:8JNo Communitv ID: .. 0Yes l:8JNo Transect ID: ·· Common Name Scientific Name Strata 0/11 Cover Indicator Status I. it-red alder Alnus rubra Tree 40 FAC 2. ,.Indian nlum Oemleria cerasi{ormis Shrub 50 FACU 3. it-salmonberrv Rububs svectabilis var. svectabilis Shrub 15 FAC+ 4. vine manle Acer circinatum Shrub 10 FAC- 5. •s]oue:h scdll.e Carex obnuvta Herb 25 OBL 6. •tadv fem Athvrium felix.x-femina var. cuclosorum Herb 10 FAC 7. ~ Other species present: % of dominant species OBL, FA.CW, FACW-1 FAC+, FAC fil)j1, Remarks: •=dominant species per the 50/20 rule. 4/5 = 80% HYDROLOGY Recorded data available? D Yes [8J No Is it the growing season? [8J Yes D No ls site inundated? [8J Yes D No Depth of surface water: l'.'. Depth to free water in pit: surface Depth to saturated soils: surface Remarks: test Jot with areas ofiundation SOILS: Map Unit Name: (AgC:) Alderwood gravel]:y sandy lQ~m, 6-I Ji"q sloQe~ {Series and Phase) Taxonomy (Subgroup): ~ic Vitrandic DurQ£hreQts Field observations confirm mapped soil type? [8]Yes 0No Profile Descrintion Deuth (jnchg) Horizon Matrix color Mottle Color 0-12 lOYR2/l Hydric Soil Indicators D Histosol (~ists) D D Histic Epipedon (8-16") D D Sulfidic Odor D D Aguie Moisture Regime D . . (more than SOo/o required) Veuetation Criteria Met? l°EIYes 0No Type(s): Wetland Hydrology Indicators Priman Indicators [8J Inundated [8J Saturated< 12 in. D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits D Drainage Patterns Drainage Class: Motile Abundance (few. common. many) Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Mg or Fe Concretions High Organic Content in · Layer of Sandy Soils Secondary Indicators (2 required) D Oxidized Root Channels< 12in. bgs D Local Soil Survey Data D Water Stained Leaves D FAC-Neutral Test 0 Other (Explain in remarks) Hydrology Criteria Met? [8JYes 0No D Excessively Drained D Soffiewhat Excessively Drained D Well Drained [8J Moderately Well Drained D Somewhat Poorly Drained· D Poorly Drained D Very Poorly Drained Mollie Size Teiture (fine. med. coarse\ 11:ravel\v loam D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Organic Pans [8J Listed on Local Hydrlc Soils List D Other (explain in remarks) Remarks: difficult to sample> l O" due to inundation; organic debris occupies the majority of soils sample and is interspersed with gravelly loam in soil profile. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Dominant? Wetland Hydrology Present? 1-lydric Soil Present? Remarks: Name: J. Cornwell 0No 0No 0No Soils Criteria Met? t8JYes 0No Is test llot within a wetland? t8JYes 0No Sheet_Q of 17 • 1 • l r-i· •. r1 L n lJ I l l j ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. ----------- Project Site: Wilson Construction Annlicallt/Owner': Ed Wilson Construction Test Plot Location: Unland (8' N of TP6) Do normal circumstances exist at the site? Is the site shrnificantlv disturbed (at.,nical situation)? Is the site a ootential nroblem area? VEGETATION (Strata: tree, sapling, shrub, woody vine, herb) Dominant Plant Sl!ecies Common Name Scientific Name l. •Douglas-fir Pseudotsuea men:iesii 2. •Indian plum Oemleris cerasiformis 3. •salmonbl"n'V -Rubus spectabili.s var. spectablilis 4. Himalavan blackberrv Rubus armenicus 5. trailin12 blackberrv Rubus ursinus ssv. macrovetalus 6. •sword fem Polvstichum munitum 7. 8. ·other species present: Date: 1157 3rd Avenue, Suite 220, Longview, Washington 98632 (360)578-1371 FAX (360)414-9305 DATA FORM -Routine Onsite Wetland Determination 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual ·· 1997 Washington State Delineation Manual 3120107 I Project#: 1587.01 Countv/State: King/WA Sec/fown/Ranl!e: Sec. 33m3NIR3E i:8JYes 1 1No Plot ID: TP7 0Yes 181No Communitv ID: .. 0Yes 181No Transect ID: •· Strata o/o Cover Indicator Status Tree 5 FACU Shrub 20 FACU Shrub 15 FAC+ Shrub 5 FACU Shrub 2 FACU Herb 40 FACU . . % or dominant species OBL, FACW, FACW-, FAC+, FAC ill{, (more than 50%, required) Remarks: •""dominant species per the sono rule. l/4 ""25% HYDROLQGY Recorded data available? D Yes 181 No Is it the growing season? 181 Yes D No Is site inundated? D Yes 181 No Depth or surface water: NIA Depth to free water in pit: NIA Depth to saturated soils: NIA Remarks: no h drolo is resent SOILS: Map Unit Name: (AgC} Alderwgod gravelly sandy 1Qam, ~-I~% ~Jone~ · (Series and Phase) Taxonomy {Subgroup): me§ic Vitrandic Qurncb[cg!§ Field observations confirm mapped soil type? i:8JYes 0No Profile Description De[!th finches) Horizon Matrix color Mo~tle ~Qlor 0-5 . IOYR 2/2 5-16 !OYR 314 H~drjc Soll Indicators D D D D Remar~: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Dominant? Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soil Present? Remarks: Name: A. A1lison Histosol (-ists) Histic Epipedon (8~16") Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime 0Yes 0Yes 0Yes 181No [8JNo 181No . D D D D Vegetation Criteria Met? Oves [8JNo Type(s): Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators D Inundated 0 Saturated< J2 in. 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits D Drainage Patterns Drainage Class: Mottle Abundance (few, common. manv) . Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Mg Or Fe Concretions High Organic Content in Layer or Sandy Soils Secondary Indicators (l required) D Oxidized Root Channels< 12in. bgs D Local Soil Survey Data D Water Stained Leaves D FAC-Neutral Test D Other (Explain in remarks) Hydrology Criteria Met? 0Yes [8JNo. D Excessively Drained D Somewhat Excessively Dritined D Well Drained 181 Moderately Well Drained D Somewhat Poorly. Drained D Poorly Drained D Very Poorly Drained Mottle Size To!!!!il (fine. med. coarse) . ornanic duff . wavcllv sandv loam D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Organic Pans 181 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Other (explain in remarks) Soils Criteria Met? nves t'8]No Is test lot within a wetland? 0Yes i:8JNo Sheet.1 of 11 ECOLOGICAL ILAND SERVl!CES, INC. --------------------- Proiect Sile: Wilson Construction Annlicant/Owner: Ed Wilson Construction Test Plot Location: Unland 1-105' W. of road\ Do normal circumstances exist at the site? Is the site shrnificantlv disturbed (atvnical situation)? Is the site a notential nroblem area? VEGETATION (Strata: tree, sapling, shrub, woody vine, herb) Dominant Plant Snecies Common Name Scientific Name Date: 1157 3rd Avenue, Suite 220, Longview, Washington 98632 (360)578-1371 FAX (360)414-9305 DATA FORM -Routine Onsite Wetland Determination 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual 1997 Washington State Delineation Manual 3120107 1 Proiect #: 1587.01 Countv/State: Kinu/WA Sec/fown/Ranee: Sec. 33fr23NIRJE [81Yes 0No Plot ID: TP8 0Yes [81No Communitv ID: -- 0Yes [81No Transect ID: -- Strata % Cover Indicator Status I. •common snowberrv .\'vmohoricaroos albus var. laeviPatus Shrub 70 FACU 2. Sitka willow Salix sitcheltSis 3. Scot's broom r\,tisus scovarius 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Other species present:there is a trace quantity of trailing blackben)' as well. % of dominant species OBL, FACW, FACW-, FAC+, FAC Q_'l1, Remarks: • ""sJominant species -per the 50/20 rule.Oil "'0% HYDROLOGY Recorded data available? 0 Yes [81 No Is it the growing season? [81 Yes 0 No Is site inundated? 0 Yes [81 No Depth or surface Water: NIA Depth to free water.in pit: NIA Depth to saturated soils: l'!iA Remarks: no h drolo is resent SOILS: Map Unit Name: (~g,C) hlderwood gravell)'. §and;['. loam 6· 15% s\Qges (Series and Phase) Taxonomy (Subgroup): mesic Vitrandic Durocl}regts Field observations confirm mapped soil type? 0Yes 0No Profile Descriotion Denth (inches) Horizon Matrix color Mottle Color 0-3 3-16 H}'.dric Soll Indicators D D D D Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Dominant? Wetland Hydrology Pre.sent? Hydric Soil Present? Remadc.'i: Name: A. Allison IOYR312 IOYR 414 Histosol (-ists) Histlc Epipedon (8-16") Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime 0Ycs 0Yes 0Yes [81No [81No [81No - - 0 0 0 0 Shrub \5 FACW Shrub 5 FACU - - - -- - (more than SOo/o required) Vee.etation Criteria Met? 0Yes r8JNo Type(s): Wetland Hydrology Indicators· Primary Indicators 0 Inundated D Saturated< 12 in. D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits D Drainage Patterns Drainage Class: Mottle Abundance <few. common. manv) - - Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Mg or Fe Concrelions High Organic Content ;. Layer of Sandy Soils Secondary Indicators (2 required) D Oxidized Root Channels< 12in. bgs D Local Soil Survey Data D Water Stained Leaves D FAC-Neutral Test · 0 Other (Explain in remarks) Hydrology Criteria Met? 0Yes [8']No u Excessively Drained 0 Somewhat Excessively Drained 0 Well Drained [81 Moderately Well Drained 0 Somewhat Poorly Drained 0 Poorly Drained 0 Very Poorly Drained Mottle Size Texture (fine. med, coarse) sandv loam -sandv loam u Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 0 Organic Pans [81 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List 0 Other (explain in remarks) Soils Criteria Met? 0Yes [81No h test lot within a wetland? 0Yes [81No Sheet_! of 11 n '. j I] ,, '] t ']. ~ ,. I I I Ll u ' j ~ .. ECOLOGICAL JLAND SERVICES, INC. ----------- Proiect Site: Wilson Consttuction AnnlicanUOwner: Ed Wilson Construction Test Plot Location: Wetland E fN end) Do normal circumstances exist at the site? Is the site sle:nlficantly disturbed latunical situatiOnW .. ls the site a oottntial problem area? VEGETATION (Strata: tree, sapling, shrub, woody.vine, herb) Dominant flant Si!etlei Common Name Scientific Name I. •Sitka willow Salix sitchensis 2. Pacific ninebark Phvsocarous caoitatus 3. salal Gaultheria shallon 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Other species present there is a tree quantity of reed canarygrass 1157 3rd Avenue, Suite 220, Longview, Washington 98632 (360)578-1371 FAX (360)414-9305 DA TA FORM -Routine Onsite Wetland Determination 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual 1997 Washington State Delineation Manual Date:. 3/20/07 I Project#: 1587.01 Countv/State: KinRIWA Sec/l'own/Ranl!e: Sec. 33m3N/R3E 181Yes 0No Plot ID: TP9 Yes 181No ConlmUnltv ID: -- Yes 181No Transect ID: -- Strata % Cover Indicator Status Shrub 70 FACW Shrub JO FACW- Shrub 5 FACU - - - ·- . . % of dominant species OBL, FACW, FACW-, FAC+, FAC J..ru', (more than 50% required) Remnr~: •""'dominant species per the 50/20 rule. 1/1 ::: 100% HYDROLOGY Recorded data available? D Yes 181 No Is it the growing season? 181 Yes D No ls site inundated? [81 Yes D No Depth of surface water: lliA Depth to free water in pit: J.:'. Depth to saturated soils: surface SOILS: Map Unit Name: (6gC) AlderwoQd gravelll'. ~an9l'. loam, §-l 5~q ~]Qll~ (Serie.sand Phase) Taxonomy (Subgroup): mesic Vittandjc Duroch[CQts Field observations confirm mapped soil type? 0Yes0No Profile Description De(!th {inches) !!!llll2!l Matrix color Mottle Color 0-8 !OYR 2/2 - 8-16 -!OYR4/6 7.5YR4/6 H)'.dric Soll Indicaior1 D Histosol (-ists) D Hlstic Epipedon (8-16") D Slllfidic Odor D Aqulc Moisture Regime Remarks: ' WETLAND DETERMINATION I . Hydrophytic Vegetation Dominant? @Yes ' Wetland Hydrology Present? t81Yes Hydric Soil Present? [8'JYes Remarks: wetland parameters have been me!. Name: J. Comwel) 0No 0No 0No D D D D Vee.etation Criteria Met? [ZIYes 0No Type(s): Wetland Hydrology Indicators Pri.mary Indicators 0 Inundated [8J Saturated< 12 in. 0 Water Marks D Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits 0 Drainage Patterns Drainage Class: Mottle Ahundagce (£ew, common manv) - . common Reducing Conditions Gleyed or L.ow Chroma Colors ·Mg or Fe Concretions High Organic Content in Layer of Sandy Soils Secondary Indicators (2 reguired) D Oxidized Root Channels< 12in. bgs D Local Soil Survey Data D Water Stained Leaves D FAC-Ncutral Test D Other (Explain in remarks) Hydrnlogy Criteria Met? [81Yes 0No El Excessively Drained Somewhat Excessively Drained D Well Drained 181 Moderately Well Drained D Somewhat Poorly Drained D Poorly Drained D Very Poorly Drained Mottle Size Texture (fine,· med, coarse) -sandy loam coarse sandv loam u Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Organic Pans 181 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Other (explain in remarks) Soils Criteria Met? 181Yes 0No ls test lot within a wetland? [81Yes 0No Sheet..2 of l1 ECOLOGICAL lLAND SERVICES, [NC. -----.._____-.....____ Proiect Site: Wilson Construction Annlicant/Owner: Ed Wilson Construction Test Plot Location: Wetland FIS offla• F-10\ Do normal circumstances exist at the site? Is the site shrnificantlv disturbed {afvnical situation)? ls the site a notential nroblem area? . VEGETATION (Strata: tree, sapling, shrub, woody vine, herb) Dominant Plant S[!ecies Common Name Scientific Name I. •black cottonwood Povulus balsami(era ssv. trichocarna 2. *vine manle Acer circindtum 3. •salmonberrv Rubus svectabilis var. sr,ectabilis 4. Indian n\um Oemleria cerasiformis 5. •sJauah sedge Carex obnupta 6. sword fem Polvstichum munitum 7. 8. Other species present: Date: 1157 3•d Avenue, Suite 220; Longview, Washington·98632 (360)578-I 37 I FAX (360)414-9305 DATA FORM -Routine Onsite Wetland Determination 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual 1997 Washington State Delineation Manual 3/20/07 I Proiect #: 1587.01 Countv/State: Kinf!./WA Secffown/Ranf!e: Sec. 33ITT3N/R3E [8:iYes 0No Plot ID, TPIO 1 IYes [8:iNo Communitv ID: .. I 'Yes [8:iNo Transect ID: •· Strata % Cover Indicator Status Tree 85 FAC Shrub 50 FAC- Shfub 25 FAC+ Shrub 10 FACU Herb 35 FACW Herb 5 FACU . . . % of dominant species OBL, FACW, FACW-, FAC+, FAC 75 % (more than 50% required) Remarks:•= dominant species per the 50/20 rule. 3/4 = 75% HYDROLOGY Recorded data available? D Yes [8l No ls it the growing season? [8l Yes D No Is site inundated? D. Yes [8l No Depth of surface water: lliA Depth to free water in pit: I: Depth to saturated soils: surface Remarks: SOILS, Map Unit Name: (AgC} Alderwood gravelly ~agdy loam 6-J J% S]OQe~ (Series and Phase) Taxonomy (Subgroup): me~ic VHrandic Durocbregts Field observations confirm mapped soil type? 0Yes ~No Profile Descrintion De(!th (inches) Horizon Matrix color Mottle Color 0-6 IOYR 2/2 . 6-16 IOYR 3/2 JOYR3/6 ffydric Soil lndicator1 D Histosol (-ists) D Histic Eplpedon (8-16") D Sulfidic Odor D Aquic Moisture Regime D D D D Ve2etation Criteria Met? 0Yes 0No Type(s), Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators D Inundated t8I Saturated < 12 in. 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits 0 Drainage Patterns Drainage Class: ' Mottle Abundance {few. common. manv) . . Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Mg or Fe Concretions High Organic Content in Layer of Sandy Soils Secondary Indicators (2 required) D Oxidized Root Channels < 1 Zin. bgs 0 Local Soll Survey Data 0 Water Stained Leaves 0 FAC-Neutral Test 0 Other.(Explain in remarks) Hydrology Criterin Met? 0Yes 0No u Excessively Drained D Somewhat Excessively Drained D Well Drained [8l Moderately Well Drained D Somewhat Poorly Drained D Poorly Drained D Very Poorly Drained Mottle Size Texture {fine med. coarse) sil~ clav loam . clav loam D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Organic Pans [8l Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Other (explain in remarks) Remnrks: root and organics within upper 6" of profile; redox. concenh·ations are clay inclusions. WETI.AND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Dominant? l8JYes Wetland Hydrology Present? [8]Yes Hydric Soil Present? l°8JYes Remarks: wetland parameters have been met. Name: J. Cornwell 0No 0No 0No Soils Criteria Mel? [8:iYes 0No ls test lot within a wetland? !8lYes 0No ShectJQof U I ·1 q ;J n . I " n f]· L f ., ' L [1 l_J ;:l •., ~ , I i .. '.'.I ! ' u :J • ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. ......___ ---- Proiect Site: Wilson Construction An .. licant/Owner: Ed Wilson Construction Test Plot Location: 1 h.Jand f-30' N ofTP 10· -3-5' hivhcr in elevation) Do normal circumstances exist at the site? Is the site shmificantlv distlirbed (atunfcal situation)? Is the site a notential nroblem area? VEGETATION (Strata: tree, sapling, shrub, woody vine, herb) Dominant Plant Saecjg Common Name Scientific Name J. •black cottonwood PopuJus balsami(era ssp. trichocarna 2. •red alder ·Alnus rubra 3. •viiie manic -Acer circinatum 4. Indian nlum Oemleria cernsiformis 5. •Pacific bleedinu heart Dicentra formosa 6. •sword fem Polvstichum munitum 7. 8. Other species present: Date: 1157 3•d Avenue, Suite 220, Longview, Washington 98632 (360)578-\37\ FAX (360)4\4-9305 DATA FORM-RoutineOnsitc Wetland Determination 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual 1997 Washington State Delineation Manual 3/20107 I Proied#: \587.0\ Countv/State: Kin,z/WA Sec/fown/RanPe: Sec. 33m3N/R3E 18)Ye, 1 1No Plot ID: TP\ \ 0Yes 18JNo Communitv ID: -· 0Yes 18JNo Transect ID: -· Strata %Cover Indicator Status Tree 10 FAC Tree 20 FAC Shrub 50 FAC- Shrub 5 FACU Herb 20 FACU Herb 5 FACU *lo of dominant species OBL, FACW, FACW-, FAC+, FAC 40% (more than 50% required) Remarks: • = dominant species per the 50/20 rnle. 2/5 = 40% HYDRQLOGY Recorded data available? D Yes [8:1 No 1s ii the growing season? 18) Yes D No ls site inundated? D Yes 18) No Depth of surface water: WA Depth to free water in pit: WA Depth to saturated soils: WA Remarks: no h drolo is resent SOILS: Map Unit Name: (Ag~) 6,lderwood mveJI~ s@nd~ loam, 6-t ~% §lOJ;!:C§ (Series and Phase) Taxonomy (Subgroup): mc:i:jcVjtrandic Durochreg15 Field observations confirm mapped soil ·type? 0Yes 18JNo Profile De5crintion De~th (inches) · Horizon Matrix color Mottle Color 0-\2 -\OYR3/2 \2-16 -\OYR 3/2 \OYR4/2' H~dric Soll Indicators D Hlstosol (-ists) D Hlstic Epipedon (8-16") D Sulfidic Odor D Aquic Moisture Regime Remarks: soils between 12-16'.' have charcoal mixed in WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Dominant? Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soil Present? RelTiarks: Name: J. Cornwell 0Yes 0Yes 0Yes 18JNo 18)No 18)No - - D D D D Veeetation Criteria Met? 0Yes [Z!No Type(s): Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators D Inundated D Saturated < 12 in. 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits 0 Drainage Patterns Drainage Class: Mottle Abundance (few. common. manv) Reducing Co~ditions Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Mg or Fe Concretions High Organic Content in Layer of Sandy Soils Secondary Indicators (2 required) D Oxidized Root Channels< 12in. bgs 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 Water Stained Leaves D FAC-Neutral Test D Other (Explain in remarks) Hydrology Criteria Met? Oves [SJNo D Excessively Drained D Somewhat Excessively Drained D Well Drained 18) Moderately Well Drained D Somewhat Poorly Drained D Poorly Drained D Very Poorly Drained Mottle Size Texture (fine. med. coarse) aravellv clav loam uravellv clav loam LJ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Organic Pans 18) Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Other (explain in remarks) Soils Criteria Met? 0Yes0No ls test lot within a wetland? 0Yes 0No ShectJ.l of !1 ECOLOG]CAL JLAN][J) SJERVl!CES, INC. ~ -------1&: Proiect Site: Wilson Construction Annlicant/Owner: Ed Wilson Construction Te.st Plot Location: Wetland HI (at fla• HJ) Do normal circumstances exist at the site? ls the site sienificantl:v disturbed (atvnical situationl? Is the site a ootential nroblem area? VEGF.:TATION (Strata: tree, sapling, shrub, woody vine, herb) Dominant Plant Suecies Common Name Scientific Name I. •trailine: blackberrv Rubus ursinus ssn. macro11etalus 2. •creeninl! buttercun Ranunculus reoens var. reoens 3. 4. . 5. 6. 7. 8. Other species present: a trace quantity of hawthome is present as well Date: 1157 3rd Avenue, Suite 220, Longview, Washington 98632 (360)578-1371 FAX (360)414-9305 DATA FORM-Routine Onsite Wetland Determination 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual 1997 Washington State Delineation Manual 3/20/07 I Prolect #: 1587.01 County/State: KinwwA Sec/I'own/Rane.e: Sec. 33m3N/RJE 1x1Yes 0No Plot ID: TP12 0Yes INNo Communiiv ID: .. 0Yes 13JNo Transect ID: -· Strata % Cover Indicator Slalus Shrub 20 FACU Herb 80 FACW . . . . . -. % of dominant species OBL, FACW, FACW~, FAC+, FAC ~ {more than SO% required) Remarks: • = dominant species per the 50/20 rule. t /2 =i 50% !!YD RO LOGY Recorded data available? D Yes ~ No Is ii the growing season? l3J Yes D No Is site inundated? D Yes l3J No Depth of surface water: NIA Depth to free water In pit: lt'. Depth to saturated soils: surface Remarks: areas of inundation within vicini oftest it SOILS: Map Unit Name: (AgC) tiJde[WOQd gravelll'. sandl'. loam, 6-15% sloges (Series and Phase) Taxonomy (Subgroup): mesjc Yittandic Durochren~ Field observations confirm mapped soil type? 13JYes 0No Profile Description Denth (inches) Horjzon Malrix color Motlle Color 0-12 -!OYR 212 12-16 . JOYR 3/3 - l:h'.dtic Soil Indicators D Histosol Hsts) D D Histic Eplpedon (8-16") D D Sulfidic Odor D D Aquic Moisture Regime D Remarks: soils may be fill; there is a tin can and tennis ball in the soil pit WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Dominant? 0Yes [8]No Wetland Hydrology Present? [8]Yes. 0No Hydric Soil Present? 0Yes [8JNo VePetation Criteria Met? 0Yes 13JNo Type(s): Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators 0 Inundated [:gj Saturated < 12 in. D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits D Drainage Patterns Drainage Class: Mottle Abu!)~ance (few commoll;· manv) . - Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Mg or Fe Co_ncretlons High Organic Content in Layer of Sandy Soils Secondary Indicators (2 required} D Oxidized Root Channels < t 2in. bgs D Local Soil Survey Data D Water Stained Leaves D FAC~Neutral Test D Other (Explain in remarks) Hydrology Criteria Met? 18JYes 0No D Excessively Drained D Somewhat Excessively Drained D Well Drained D Moderately Well Drained D Somewhat Poorly Drained D Poorly Drained D Very Poorly Drained Mottle Size Texture lOne, med, coarse) . 2ravellv loam . gravelly loam D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Organic Pans ~ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Other {explain in remarks) Soils Criteria Met? nves [:gjNo Remarks: although the above parameters have not been met; this plot is located within the flagged wetland boundary Is test lot within a wetland? Name: J. Conrwe\l Sheet..U. of 11 13JYcs 0No [J . fl· i n d ., "1 L LI ,.,, L r I , I I 1 ,.J : l ~.J ECOLOGICAL JLAND SERVICES, INC. -------------- Proiect Site: Wilson Construction A"'"licant/Owner: Ed Wilson Construction Test Plot Location: Uoland Oocated-15' N ofTP12) Do normal circumstances exist at the site? Is the site sionlficantlv disturbed la...,"'ical situation)? ls the site a notential nroblem area? VEGETATION (Strata: tree, sapling, shrub1 woody vine, herb) Dominant Plant S:necjg Common Name ScicnlUic Name 1. •Trailine. blackbc1TV Rubus ursinu ssD. macrooeta/us 2. •black hawthomc Crataem,s dou"lasii 3. Himala"""O blackb-..ru Rubus armenicus 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Other species· present:tracc quanitity Of Indian plum Date: 1157 3rd Avenue, Suite 220, Longview, Washington 98632 (360)578-1371 FAX (360)414-9305 DATA FORM -Routine Onsite Wetland Determination 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual 1997 Washington State Delineation Manual 3/20/07 I Proiect #, 1587.01 ·countv/State: Kin•iWA Sec/fown/Ranoe: Sec. 33mJN/R3E Yes 0No Plot ID, TP13 Yes [giNo Community ID: -- Yes [giNo Transect ID: -· Strata %.Cover Indicator Status Shrub 95 FACU Shrub 50 FAC Shrub 5 FACU . . . . . . . - % of dominant species OBL, FACW, FACW-, FAC+, FAC ~ (more than 50% required) Remnrk-1: •""dominant species per the 50/20 rule. 1/2 = 50% HYDROLOGY Recorded data available? D Yes [gJ No Is it the growing season? [gJ Yes D No Is site inundated? D Yes [gJ No Depth of surface watef: llit. Depth lo free water in pit: llit. Depth lo saturated soils: NIA Remarks: no h drolo · is resent SOILS, Map Unit Name: (Ag~) Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, Q-Q~ :;loges (Series and Phase) Taxonomy (Subgroup): me:iic Vitrandic Durochreuts Field observations confirm mapped soil type? [gives 0No Profile De5crintion Deeth {i9ches) Horizon Matrix color Mottle Color 0-6 . 6-16" . Hydric Soll Indicators D D D D Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Dominant? WeUand Hydrology Present? Hydric Soil Present? Remarks; Name: J. Conrwell lOYR 3/3 IOYR 4/4 Histosol (-ists) Histic Epipedon (8-16") Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime 0Yes Oves 0Yes [giNo 0No [giNo . . D D D D Veeelation Criteria Met? 0Yes [8}No Type(s), Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators D Inundated 0 Saturated< 12 in. 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits 0 Drainage Patterns Drainage Class: Mottle Abundance f(ew, common. manv) . . Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Mg or Fe Concretions High'Organic Content in Layer or Sandy Soils Secondary Indicators (2 required) D Oxidized Root Channels< 12in. bgs 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 Water Stained LeaVes 0 FAC-Neutral Test 0 Other (Explain in remarks) Hydrology Criteria Met? 0Yes .18JNo D Excessively Drained D Somewhat Excessively Drained D Well Drained D Moderately Well Drained D Somewhat Poorly Drained D Poorly Drained D Very Poorly Drained Mottle Size ~ (fine med. coarse) . -vcllv loam .. ,.....,,vellv loam D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Organic Pans [gJ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Other (explain in remarks) Soils Criteria Met? 0Yes [giNo Is test lot within a wetland? Oves 0No Sheet.11 of 11 ECOLOGICAL LAND SERV][CES, INC. ~ -------- Proiect Site: Wilson Construction A ~ ... licant/Owner: &I Wilson Construction Test Plot Location: Uoland (at south end of Wetland J) Do normal circumstances exist at the site? ls the site siPnificantlv disturbed <atypical situation)? Is the site a notential nroblem area? VEGETATION (Strata: tree, sapling, shrub, woody vine, herb} Dominant Plant Sl!ecies Date: ·1157 3rd Avenue, Suite 220, Longview, Washington 98632 (360)578-1371 FAX (360)414-9305 DATA FORM -Routine Onsite Wetland Determination 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual 1997 Washington State Delineation Manual J/20/07 I Project#: 1587.01 Countv/State: Kinw'WA Sec/fown/RanQ'e: Sec. 33ITT3N/RJE Yes 0No Plot ID: TP14 Yes 181No Communilv ID: .. Yes ""No Transect ID: -- Common Name Scientific Name ' Strata 0A, Cover Indicator Status I. •red too A2roslis 21Rantea Herb 20 FAC 2. •Kentuckv blue1Itass Poa oratensis Herb 20 FAC 3. •broad leaf r.Jantain Planln20 maior Herb 20 . FACU+ 4. common dandelion Taraxacum of11cina/e Herb 15 FACU 5. common velvetirrass Holcus /anatus Herb 15 FAC 6. common buttcrcun Ranunculus reoens var. renens Herb 10 FACW 7. . 8. . Other species present: % of dominant species OBL, FACW, FACW-, FAC+, FAC 66% (more than SO% required) Remarks: "'= dominant species per the 50/20 rule. 2/3::: 66%. Unkn poa assumed to be FAC, but not poa compressa HYDROLOGY Recorded data available? D Yes 181 No Is it the growing season? 181 Yes D No Is site inundated? D Yes· 181 No Depth of surface water: lliA Depth to free water in pit: NIA Depth to saturated soils: NIA Remarks: no h drolo is resent SOILS: Map Unit Name: {Ag!:) AldeJwQod graven~ sandy loam 6-l 2fq sJ012~s (Series and Phase) Taxonomy (Subgroup): mesi£ Vitrandic Durochrcgts Field observations confirm mapped soil type? 181Yes 0No Profile Descrintion De~th (!nches) Horizon Matrix color Mottle ~olor 0-6 . 6-10 . 10-16 . Hl'.dric ~oil Indicators D D D D Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Dominant? Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soil Present? Remarks: Name: A. Allison IOYR2/2 IOYRJ/4 5YR 314 IOYR 3/4 Histosol (-ists) Histit Epipedon (8-16") Sulfldlc Odor Aquic Moisture Regime 181Yes 0Yes 0Ye.s 0No 181No 181No D D D D Ve@etation Criteria Met? 181Yes 0No Type(s): Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators D Inundated D Saturated<llin. D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits D Drainage Patterns Drainage Class: Mottle Abundance (few, common. manv) . common . . Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Mg or Fe Concretions High Organic Content in Layer of Sandy Soils Secondary Indicators {2 required) 0 Oxidized Root Channels< 12in. bgs 0 Local Soil Survey Data D Water Stained Leaves D FAC•Neutral Test D Other (Explain in remarks) Hydrology Criteria Met? 0Yes ~No EJ Excessively Drained Somewhat Excessively Drained D Well Drained 181 Moderately Well Drained D Somewhat Poorly Drained D Poorly Drained D Very Poorly Drained Mottle Size Texture {fine med, coarse) . l!favellv sandv loam coarse P"ravellv sandv loam . -vellv sandv loam u Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Organic Pans 181 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Other (explain In remarks) Soils Criteria Met? 0Yes 181No Is test lot within a wetland? 0Yes 181No Sheet.JA of 11 r.J r ,. n ,, I t '] ,. l ,. f] i.' '] L n u .. cJ \ ,; : ,. u ,·1 I u ] ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. .........._ ---- ProiectSite: Wilson Construction A--licant/Owner: Bd Wilson Construction Test Plot Location: Wetland J '-20 N ofTP6) Do normal circumstances exist at the site? Is the site sionl(icantlv disturbed fat··-ical situation\? ls the sile a notential "roblem area? VEGETATION (Strata: tree, sapling, shrub, woody vine, herb) Dominant Plant S[!eciei Common Name Scientific Name I. •Sitka willow Salix silchen.ris 2. •common velvet ........ "S Holcus lanntus 3. •cr·-ina buttercun Ranunculus renens var. renens 4 . soft rush Juncus effusus . 5. birdsfoot trefoil Lotus cornicuia1us 6. 7. 8. Date: 1157 3'd Avenue, Suite 220, Longview, Washington 98632 (360)578-1371 FAX (360)414-9305 DATA FORM-Routine Onsite Wetland Determination 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual 1997 Washington State Delineation Manual 3no101 I Pro;ect #: 1587.01 Countv/State: Kin;,wA Sec/fown/Ranae: Sec. 33m3N/R3E 181.Yes 0No Plot ID: TP15 0Yes 181.No Communitv ID: .. 0Yes MNo Transect ID: -- Strata 0/11 Cover Indicator Status Shrub 10 FACW Herb 40 FAC Herb 35 FAC Herb 10 FACW Herb 5 FAC . . Other species present:there is a trace quantity of red top present (more than 50% required) . % of dominant species OBL, FACW, FACW-, FAC+, FAC .lilll..lJ, Remarks: • = dominant species per the 50/20 rule. 3/3 = 100% HYDROLOGY Recorded data available? D Yes 181. No ls it the growing season? 181. Yes D No ls site inundated? D Yes 181. No Depth of surface water: NIA Depth to free water in pit: L Depth to saturated soils: surface SOILS: Map Unit Name: {AgC) Alderood grave\Jy Joam, 6-I,:i:¥q s]Qll~ (Series and Phase) Taxonomy (Subgroup): rrsic Vitrandic Duroch~!§ Field observations cqnfirm mapped soil type? [8JYes 0No Profile Descrlntlon Dentb (inches) fu!.!:!!fil! Matrix color Mottle Color 0-7 . !OYR3/I . . 7-14" IOYR 3/4 Hxdric Soll Indicators D Histosol (-ists) D D H;st;c Eplpedon (8-16") D D Sulfidic Odor D D Aquic Moisture Regime D Vec,etation Criteria Met? l8JYes 0No Type(s): Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators 0 Inundated O· Saturated< 12 in. 0 Water Marks D Drmunes 0 Sediment Deposits 0 Drainage Patterns Drainage Class: Mottle ~bundance trew. common. manv1 _. . . Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Mg or Fe Concretions High Organic Content In Layer of Sandy Soils Secondary Indicators (2 required) 0 Oxidized Root Channels< 12in. bgs 0 Local Soil Survey Data D Water Stained Leaves 0 FAC-Neutral Test 0 Other (Explain in remarks) Hydrology Criteria Met? [8'JYes 0No D Excessively Drained D Somewhat Excessively Drained D Well Drained 181. Moderately Well Drained D SomewhBt Poorly Drained D Poorly Drained D Very Poorly Drained Mottle Size Texture <fine. med. coa'rsel . sand" clav loam . sandv eravellv loam D Organic Streaking in Sindy Soils D Organic Pans [8J Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Other (explain in remarks) Remarks:oxidizcd roots are present within profiel; gravel layer begins @-4"; test pit ends at water table WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Dominant? [8]Yes Wetland Hydrology Present? [8]Yes Hydric Soil Present?. l8JYes Remarks: wetland parameters have been met Name: A. Allison 0No 0No 0No Soils Criteria Met? 181.Yes 0No Is test nlot within a wetland? [8JYes 0No Sheet.J..l. of 17 ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. ---------- Proiect Site: Wilson Constrnction Annlicant/Owner: Ed Wilson Construction Test Plot Location: Wetland K-lnear fla" K6) Do normal c:ircumstances exist at the site? Is the site sionificantlv disturbed (at"nical situation\? Is the site a notential nroblem area? VEGETATION (Strata: tree, sapling, shrub, woody vine, herb) Dominant Plant Sgedes Common Name Scientific Name I. "'Pacific willow Salix Jucidn var. lasiandrn 2. Doualas sniraea Sniraea douPlasii 3. •red ton A vrosti.s vivantea 4. •crecnino buttercun Ranunculus renen.s var. renens 5. •dovefoot 0 eranium Geranium mol/e 6. soft rush Juncus effusus · 7. 8. Other species present: Date: 1157 3rd Avenue, Suire 220, Longview, Washington 98632 (360)578-1371 FAX (360)414-9305 DATA FORM -Routine Onsite Wetland Determination 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual 1997 Washington State Delineation Manual 3/20/07 I Proiect #: 1587.01 Countv/State: KinRIWA Sec/fown/Ran11e: Sec. 33m3N/RJE 0Yes 0No Plot ID: TPl6 0Yes 0No Communitv ID: •· 0Yes l81No Transect ID: -- Strata % Cover Indicator Status Shrub 50 FACW+ Shrub ·s FACW Herb 35 FAC Herb 30 FACW Herb 20 UPL Herb 15 FACW -. % or dominant species OBL, FACW, FACW-, FAC+, FAC ~ (more than 50% required) Remarks: •"' dominant species per the 50/20 rule. 4/5 c 80% HYDROLOGY Recorded data available? D Yes 0 No Is it the growing season? l8I Yes D No Is site inundated? l'8l Yes D No Depth or surface water: H'.'. Depth to free water in pit: surface Depth to saturated soils: surface Remarks: free water at surface with areas of surface ondin SOILS: Map Unit Name: (6.&Cl Alderwood ruvelly sandy ]Qam (Series and Phase) Taxonomy (Subgroup): mesic Vitrandic Durocbregts Field observations con.firm mapped soil type? l81Yes 0No Profile Descrintion Denth {Inches) Horizon Matrix color Mottle Color 0-7 10YR3/3 - 7-16 lOYR 4/2 5YR4/6 Hydric Soil Indicators D Histosol (-ists) D D Histic Epipedon (8-16") D D SuUidic Odor D D Aquic Moisture Regime D Veeetatlon Criteria Met? l8JYes 0No Type(s): Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators l8J Inundated l8J Saturated < 12 in. D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits 0 Drainage Patterns Drainage Class: Mottle Abundance ffew common-manv, few Re~ucing Conditions Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Mg or Fe Concretions High Organic Content in Layer of Sandy Soils Secondary Indicators (2 required) 0 Oxidized Root Channels< 12in. bgs D Local Soil Survey Data 0 Water Stained Leaves D FAC-Neutral Test D Other (Explain in remarks) Hydrology Criteria Met? t8;JYes 0No D Excessively Drained D Somewhat Excessively Drained D Well Drained l8I Moderately Well Drained D Somewhat Poorly Drained D Poorly Drained D Very Poorly Drained Mottle Size Texture (fine. med. coarse) 11ravell,. loam fine oTilvel\v clav loam D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Organic Pans l8I Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Other (explain in remarks) Remarks:soil pit located -l O' north of plot due to difficulty in obtaining profile due to surface inundation WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Dominant? [8)Ycs Wetland Hydrology Present? t8JYes Hydric Soil Present? [8JYes Remarks: wetland parameters have been met Name: J. Cornwell 0No 0No 0No Soils Criteria Met? 0Yes0No Is test nlot within a wetland? 0Ycs 0No SheetJ.Q of l1 ''] 1 ' n' l- rl ·~ ' f'J '. ; I !·1· }: 'I 1. Ii.-. Ll . ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, ][NC. --------- Proiect Site: Wiisoh Construction Annficant/Owner: Ed Wilson Construction Test Plot Location: Uoland (west ofTP 16) Do normal circumstances exist at the site? Is the site 1ienificantlv disturbed latvnical situation'\? ls the site II ootential oroblem area? VEGETATION (Strata: tree. sapling, shrub, woody vine, herb) D2minant Plant S:n«ies Common Name Scientific Name I. •red ton AKrostis vif!anlea 2. *hairv cat's:-ea.r Hvnochaen·s radicata 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Other species present Date: 1157 3rd Avenue, Suite 220, Longview, Washington 98632 (360)578-1371 FAX (360)414-9305 DATA FORM -Routine Onsite Wetland Determination 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual 1997 Washington State Delineation Manual 3/20/07 I Proiect # : 1587.01 Countv/State: KinWWA Sec/fown/Ranl!e: Sec. 33m3N/R.3E [8]Ye, I INo Plot ID: TPI7 I IYes l:8JNo Community ID: .. 1 IYes 181No Transect ID: -- Strata % Cover Indicator Status Herb 65 FAC Herb 35 FACU . . . . . . . . . o/o or dominant species OBL, FACW, FACW-, FAC+, FAC ~ (more than SO% required) ~; • = dominant species per the 50/20 rule. l/2 =:z 50% HYDROLOGY Recorded data available? D Yes 181 No Is it the growing season? 181 Ye, D No Is site inundated?. D Ye, 181 No Depth or surface water: t!IA Depth to free water in pit: t!IA Depth to satura1ed soils: llit, Remarks: no h drolo is resent SOILS: Map Unit Name: (Ag~) AJdem'.Qod gravelly ~andy loam, 6-J 5~ ~loges (Series and Phase) Taxonomy (Subgroup): mesic Vittimdic Qurochrim~ Field obse·rvations confirm mapped soil type? 181Yes 0No Profile Descrinlion Denth (!nches) Horizon Matrix color Mottle Color 0-5" !OYR3/3 . 5-T . IOYR 4/3 . 7-16 !OYR4/4 IOYR3/4 Hl'.dric Soil Indicators D Histosol (-lsts) D D Histic Epipedon (8-16 11 ) D D Sulfidic Odor D D Aquic Moisture Regime D Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Dominant? 0Yes l8JNo Wetland Hydrology Present? 0Yes [8]No Hydric Soll Present? [8JYes 0No Remarks: wetland parameters have not been met Name: J. Cornwell Veoetation Criteria Met? 0Yes l8JNo Type(s): Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators 0 Inundated 0 Saturated< 12 in. 0 Water Marks 0 Drirt Lines 0 Sediment Deposits . 0 Drainllge Patterns Drainage Class: Mottle Abundance (few common, man"\ . . common Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Mg or Fe Concretions High Organic Content in Layer of Sandy Soils Secondary Indicators (2 required)· D Oxidized Root Channels< 121n. bgs 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 Water Stained Leaves 0 FAC-Neutral Test 0 Other (Explain in remarks) Hydrology Criteria Met? 0Yes 12JNo D Excessively Drained D Somewhat Excessively Drained D Well Drained 181 Moderately Well Drained D Somewhat Poorly Drained D Poorly Drained D Very Poorly Drained Mottle Size Texture (One, med. coarse) 1rravellv loam gravelly loam medum cobbly sandy loam D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D ()rganic Pans 181 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Other (explain in remarks) Soils Criteria Met? l:8lves0No Is test lot within a wetland? Oves [8]No SheetJl of 11 w...,.-s...-118 WETLAND,RATINGF:ORM:,WESTERNWASHINGTON Ven:loa 2-Upddl,rS July 2006 '° mamill ~ md nprodaclbilby mmD1 ISCff Name of wetland (if known): Wetland AB Date of site visit:3/20f2007 & 312)/2007 ·. .. . .· R>ted by/ Cornwell Trained by Ecology? Ycsl8l NoO Dale ofTraiDing: 11/2006 . . . . . SECTION: ll TOWNSIIlP: ;m[_RANGE: ;l!, ls S/f/R•inAppen<fix D? Ycs_Nol!; Map of wetland unit Flgure2. 2A, 2B. 2C. 2D. 2E. 2F DRAFT SUMMARY OF RATING Estimate~ size~ Category ba,ed on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland n _x_ m. __ IV __ Category r ... Score ~io Score for Water.Quality Functions ~26 Caiegory II = Score S 1-69 SCOJC for Hydrologic Functions 10 Cat,gory ID = Semo 30-50 . . Category IV= Score< 30 Soon: for Habrtat Funcbons 19 TOTAL Score for foncdom 5S ~ · Category based on SPECIAL CBARAC1ERISTICS of wetland • ~ , -•• • ~ , • • • •.-". ~-• • < I , • • • IT__ Does not Apply X I El Fioal Category (moose: the ~highest" ..,ugory frvm above:) Check the appropriate type and dau or wetland being ntecL Estoarlne NatunlB Wetland Matuft Forert Slo Old Growth Forest Coastal La • Frcsbwatrr Ttdal lnterdan•I None ofthe above Cbcck if unit hu multiple HGM classe1 resent Comments Refer to Photos I & 2; • S.226 sf is the on-site area Wetland Rating Form -western Wasbingtoo version 2 · August.2004 Wdhnd llmK or number AS Does the wetland being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer :YE'S·to any of the questions below you will need to_;protect the wetland acamling to the regulations r<garding the specilll cbmaderistics found in the we&nd.:, -. -· -.-·-·. . . '' ~ . SPl. Has the wdland been documr:nml as a habilalfar any FederalJy listed Thnatmed en-&,,langmd tDdmal or plant ,peria (f!E ,pectu)7 unkn For the purposes of this rating system, "documented• means the wetland is on the appropriate state or federal datab8Sc.' ·. ·. SP2. Haf the waland iorit beeii doi:rimented as habitat for any State luted 71rreatmed or Endangmd iudmaI ~ciu? unkn For the purposes of this rating system. •documented• means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are caJegorized as Category 1 Natural Herin,go Wetlands(= p. 19 of dDla form). SP3. Doa 11¥ wetland contain individuals of Pril1rlty specta luted by tM WDFW · for the ztate? unkn SP4. Dou the wetland have a local significance In additi.on to il:lfunctimu'! For exmnp1e. ~ ~.has~ ~dcntified in the Shoreline Master Pro~ the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a locsJ manageIIJent plan as having special · significance. -· To C011fDkte the nai part of the data sheet you will rleed to ·iktennine tM Hydrogeomorphic Gass o(th·e Wetland being fated Toe bycirogeornorphic ~18SSificatiOD. groups wetlands into those that function in sin\ilar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well die Wetland functions. The Hydropnnorphic Class ofa wetland can be determined usingthci'key below. Seep. 24 for more detailed ~ons on ct~sifying ":i:tlands. ·· CommmU A formal habitat and species request has not been submitted;. however during th"e 3n.0/2007 & 3/21/2007 field visits no priority habitats and speciCS were observed within the-wetland. unkn Wetland Rating Form -w~ Washington version 2 2 ~ugust2004 ·' -------- Wetland name or nurnba" /tS B 1. Docs the wetland hav~ the po~!l-1 to provide ~bftat for many spccir:s? H J .1 V egetatjgg stmgure (sap. 72) Check drt: typu of Hgelation classa prua,I (as defined by Cuwardi.n)-Size tJrraJwld for each class UV.. acre or more Ulan 10% of the area if unit is smalkr than 2.5 acres. D A""'"" bod 0 F.=,gmt plant, 18J Saub/shrub (area.s when: shrubs have ">30% cover) l8J Forested (ar=s where trees have >30% cover) Jf_lhe unit ha.r aforuud class check if C8J Forested m=s have 3 out of5 stnata (canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbnccous,. IIlOss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the fmmcd polygon Add the numbu oJ-.,egnaJJ,on typu that qua/JjJ. lfyau htrn: 4 types or more 3 type, 2 type, Mi,,··1~1,-:·· 1 H 1.2 Hydrppqjgds (sap. 13) pomts-4 pomt,•2 points-! '-·-=o Check drt: typu of wat.er ngimu (hydroperlods) pruartwl1Jrin the waland T1te wakr regtme has to«wermon than J(M of dz wetland or S',acn ta couns. (Su tulfordut:ription of hydrop,rlod,.) 0 Pcnnancntly flooded or inundated 4 or mme types J1R=SCn1: C8J Seuomlly Hoodod acimmdat<d 3 type, ....... D Occssicm,Uy flooded or immdmcd 2 types PRSCDt 0-only 0 Pcrmmentfy flowing stream. or ri\la' in, or edjaccm to, the wcdand 181 SeasonaDy Bowing stream or river in, or adjacart to. tbc wetland c::::I Lou-}'rl,,p--2 pohds FroJn,,ata tidal wdlluul -1 . pomts-3 poum-2 pomb-1 H 1.3 RidzriS'i'Uf of PlaqtSpcciq (wp. 75) CouIIt tbc nmnber of plant species in tbc wc:t1and that COYa" 111 lcut 10 ft2. (DtjJuarJ pmchu of the S(11lU spectu can be canblnbl to mut 1M nu thruhold.) f OU do not have lo na1M lite spedU. Do not tnclude &rasianMtlfoll, rud cant:irygra.u, purpk loosestrife, Canadian Thistk. If you counted: > 19 species points •2 S -19 species points • I list sped.es bduw if you want to: <5 species painb -O 4 2 Total forpagcl Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 13 August 2004 -------- Wetland name ornumb,:r/lS H 1.4 Intcrn>qsiog ofhabitag (s.u p. 76) Decide from the diagrams !>e,low whether imaspc:rsion between Cowardin vegetation classes (described in HI.I), or classes and unvegctated areas (can include open water or mudflat!) is high. mc:diwn. low, or cane. :f/(;·,-@ '\. None = 0 pomts Low = I point Moderate=2poinls / [riparian braided channels] H I .S §pg;jN Habmt Fqturq· (aep. 71) CJr«k the habitatfoaturt:s that are prumt tn the vnland. 'IM rrumbu of dtech is the~, efpobru you put inUJ the nal co/:umn.. ~ Large. downed. woody debris within the wed.and {>4in. diamctc:r end 6 ft long). ~ Standing :mags {diameter at bottom >4 inchC3) in the wetland D Undc::rcut banks are presem: fix at lcut 6.6 ft. (2m) muVor ovcdwiging vegetation extends at lcast3.3 ft (Im) over a scream·(or ditch) in, ar coatiguou.1 with the unit, for zt least 33 ft (!Om) 0 Stable steep banks of fine material that misht be used by beaver or musknd: fur denning (>30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beawr activity me prescm (CUJ slirub:s or treu that haPe not yet tumttd ~rown) D At least Y. aac of thin"'5tcmmcd pcrsistcut vegetation or woody braadics me present in ..... that"" penn,n,,nly"' ....aoally inandmm (,tn,ctwujo, egg-laymg by amphibians) 0 Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wctlan.d arm in each stratum. of plants Note: The 20% nated i11 _ee1rly prlntin8!_!),[_rh4 manual on page 78 is an error Comments: H 1. TOTAL.Score-poiential for pi:oviding habitat Addthe:scorufrom H!_.l. Hl.2, HJ~!_. !f/.4, H/.5 - ... -ie 3 2 12 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 14 August2004 W«llndn:ariieornlll!lbtr/1B H 2. Does the wetla1:1d.havc the opportnnfty to provide habitat for many spcdcs!) . ·Jt·/. H 2.1 Dg(frn (sn p. 10) -Choose tlu: description thtn but rq,resmu .condiJion of buffer of wetland. 'IM highest scortng crltt:rlon that applfr:s to the wetland is to be useii In the ranrig: Su tut/or defmtttrin of · "undlnurbai." ' · · '' D 100 m (330ft) ofrdativcly undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumfcn:ncc. No sttw:ans arc within the imdistmbcd part of buffer. (relatively Dlldisturbcd also means no gnl%ing. no landscaping. no daily human 11Se) Points • 0 100 m (330ft) ofrilativelyunmstmbcd ,....-.,_ roc1:y ....._ oropco ~ >SO% cira.rmference..· ... ·-· D S0m (170ft) ofrclati.vdy u:ndiscmbcd vegetated areas. rocky m:as, or open wm:r >95% ciramucn:occ.. ....... 2 D IOOm (330ft) ofrdmvclynndisturbed veget:at.edareas,rodr::y areas, or open water >25% circumfcrmce. Points• 0 SOm (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky meas. or open wlller for > SO% circumfcrmce. Points• -·· Ifbafrcrdoa aot med aay of the thftecritma abovt 181 No pawd.,.... (acq,tpawd trailJ) orbuildmgs wi1hin 2Sm(80ft) of-.Od > 95% circumfcn:ncc. Light tD modm:te gming, or lawns are OK.. ....... 0 No paved an:as orbaildings: within 50m of wetland for >SO% circomfcrmce.. Light to moch:nile grazing« lawns.are OK ,. Points, D HCII\')' grmng in baffiir. . Points• D Vegetated buffi:rs arc<2m wide (6,6ft) for more than 9S%ofthc ciramlfttcocc (e.g. tilled fields, paving; basalt bc:droct c:xtcnd to edge of wetland) Points. D Buffi:rdoe.tnotmeetaay~ftbeaitz:riaabove. . .. , .. : ....... . . . . . H 22 Corridors and Connec::tiogs (s« p. 11) · H 2.2.1 ls the wedand part of a relatndy n:ndistmbed and mi:hrotcn vcg,:tm:d c:ttridor ( either ripari.im cir upland) that is 11:l kml 1SO ft wide, bas 11:t lcast 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that cmmects tD cstmtries, othcrwcdmds or undisturbed uplands that are at least 2SO acres in sb::c? (danu In riparlDn carrldon, heavily USt:d gravel roads, pavt:d roads, are consldt:red breab In tlu: comdor). · []YES• 4 polDts (go to H 23) · 181No • go 1o H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 ls the wctland part of a rclativdy undisturbed and unbrotc:o vcgctatcd c:ttridor ( either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide. has at least 30% cover of shrobs or forest, and connects to estuaries, olhc-wedan!b or nndistmbcd uplands that arc at ltd ZS I aacs in siz.c? OR a Lakwriugt" Wdland, ifit docs not have an undistmbcd a:nidor as in the question aixm,7 [)YES • 2 polDts (go to H 2.J) i8JNO • H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 ls the wetland: within S mi (Bbn) of a braclcish or salt water estnmy OR within3 mi of a large fiddorpanare(>40 aacs) OR within I mi ofa lake greatrrthan 20 aaes'? -"roi\'ES -I -int []NO• 0 nohlts Tota1 for page .J_ Wetland Ruing Fenn -wcmm Washington vmion2 IS Augusl 2004 Wed.odimtmm-numbcr .AB H 2.3 Nm gradjaomtto qthq nrigrity 1mtriW1 tiS!ld by WDFW <-p. ~ Wmc:h of the followmg priority babim111n1 within 330ft (100m) of the lWl!lmd? (NOTE: tJw conna:tlom do not haw to be nltztt,dy ~ 'l1tt:1t: art: DFW drjlnJtlons. Ched with ymrr local DEW biologut if then are any tpttstl~ 181 Rlparwi: The area adjacent to aquiitic: l)'Slems with flowing wll1l!:r that oorn:ains dc:mcms of both aquaric and terrestrial ci:osysteml \OnUch mutually influence c:ach other. D AlpCII Studs: Pureormmd st1tncb ofupc:n grc:mrthano.s ha(2 acn:s). D Oilfs: Oruttttha:n 7.6 m (25 ft) high imd oc:cuning below SOCIO ft. 0 Old-pvwdi fonstr. (OJ.d..gmvtb-siafCucadeam) Stands ofat leastl ~species. forming a multi-layered amopy with oc:casiomJ lm:811 opc:nwgs; with 111 lcmt 20 tr=slha (8 trec:sf~) > 81 cm.(32 i:n) dhh or> 200 yccw of~ D Matm'e fnnsts: Stmdswi1b awnpdiametuscx:cec:dins SJ em{ll in)dbh; aown oova may be ~ that I 00%; dc:c:ay, decadmoe. aumbrn of snap. imd qmmtity oflmge cf~ mmaia1 is. pcnlly Im than that found in old-growth; 80 -200 ~ old wc:"st of the ~ c:rcst D Pnlria: Rclstrldy undisturbed 1ras (a mdiactcd by clominlnce of.lQ!tive plmm) where gn:sses ~ fmbs form the mt:ural. climax plm:d. commanity. D Talm: R g usrmofnd::rubble rangmg in svcngesize0.15-2.0m(0.5-6.S ft). composed ofbmh, cd:site, md/or ~ roc:k, including ripnip llides amd mine tailinp. Ma:y be asoc:mtid with dilfa. . 0 C.-A rmtm.ny occurriiig osvity, ra:as. wid,. or systrm ofi.utawww.ctcd pamge, 0 Orqoa "1tlte Oak: Woodlancb Stands of pure oak or oak/comfc:f anociations wbc:Ri c:anopy covuap of tho OU componcm of tbe lllllK1 is 25%. 0 Urbu Natv:ral. ()pm Spee: A priority species n:sides within or iJ adjacent to the open apace and mes it tbr brccdma m,d/or ff8D1ar fccdins; tmdlat: the open spac:e t\mcticms a a c:urridor mnnectmg ocher prltrrlty habitats, ~lly dJOx that wouJd od=wi,o be isolsted; rmd/or the open space, is a imlm:d ram:citofmmm.l habmd: lcgc:r dm:n 4 ha (IO~) mid iJ sunocmded by urlJm -D ~~ib: ~tu!.! habitats and lllljm:imt tidal Wt:tlandl, t11U111y am-ax:iosm by land but with open. partly obstructc:d or sporadic aocess to the open oc:am,. md in which ooem water is 111 lc:ast occasionally diluted by fn:shwatef runoff'ftom the land. The salinity may be pcriodic:ally inc:ra,ed above that of the open ooeari by evaporation. Alq IIOfflCI low-c:ncl'JD' ooatlioel there is epprec:iahle dilution of sea wale!". Estuarine habitat extends upstream md lmdwmd ti, where ocean d i,ed alb metSUfe lessdrmO.Sppt. during the period ofswnge mmual lowflow. Jndudc:s both estmriea mid bgnons. D Marllle/Eataariae Shontina: Shorelinell include the intertidal m,d subtidal zones ofbeac:hes. and may aho inc:lude the bacbhore and adjaccm compcmt:nts of the taTcstrial lands:cape (e.g.. cliffs, map,~ tt=s, dunes, meadows) that are im:portmit. to shordine imoc:il!ted fish and wildlife and thal contribute to shoreline func:tion (e.g., Dnd/roclc/loa rcc:ruitment, nutrient contnbution. erosion control). If wetland has 3 or mon priority habitats .. 4 poblts If wetland has 2 priomy habitats• 3 pomtl If wetland has I priority babitm-1 poim No habrtm•O points Nott: All~ lffl1ancb arr by definition a priority habltm but 127'1! not brduded flt this Jin. Wt:tlantb art oddrast:d hi qllt:Stion H 1. 4, Wetland Rating Form-western Washington venion2 16 August~ ~--~ r~~-= ~ 1,.,._ •• _ • ..,.... ,....,... !.-:~c •• _., ,.......... -i-----· •• '-'··-· r.:-- Wedznd ~ or immbs AS H 2.4 Wetland Land5f!P'T (choose tN one <kcription of tlw landscapt around thL · wetland that bulfils} ($«JJ. U) Thc:rc arc at least 3 other wetlands within Yi mile.. and the conncaions between them arc rdarivcly undisturbed (light grazing betwCCll wetlands OK, mi is lake shore with some boating, but connection, sbowd NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill. fields. or Olhc:r--poim,= The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and then: are 3 other lake- fringe wetlands wi1hill Yi mile poim,= There are at least 3 other wetlands within Yi mile, BUT the connections between them arc disturbed . poi.ms .. lbc wetland is Lake-ftinge on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within Yi mile poim,• There is at least 1 wetland within Y.i mile. poim,= Thm: are no wetlands within Yi mile. nnint..= . H 2. Tar AL SccR ~-for providing habitat Add 1M &COrU in 1M colw,m abou TOTAL far H I from page 14 Toal Score for Habitat Functions -add the point3 forH I, H 2 and record theresul.tonp. I Comment, 3 7 12 19 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 17 August2004 . ;.""--, :..-~ .. -,...; ..... ··---·--;; ·---~.,;;i Wetlmd.aa.n,,orn~ /liJ CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wetland meets the attributa described below and circle the appropriate answin and Category. Does the wetland meet the following aitcri.a for EstDminc wc:tlands? D The dominant water regune is tidal. O v-""' D With. salinity greater than O.S ppt [JYEs • Go ID SC l.l 181NO SC 1.1 ls the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National Estwuy Reserve. Natural Area Preserve. State Puk or Edoc:atiooal, F.a:viromnental, or Scicutific Rcsc:rvc dcsipat.cd llmCI" WAC 332-30-lSt? IYES • Catcgo,y I []NO go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 b the wetland at le& l acn: in size md meets at least two of the following three conditiom? YES -Category I NO -Category 0 0 Tu:w.wmd ;.<dmvdy,.,,._ (lw no dmog, ditrhing, fillmg. ailimticm. grazing, and has less than l 0% cover of nm-mdi"WC plmt spc:cic:s. If the ~ Spmtina spp. are the cmly species that cover mare than 10% of the wedmd, then the wcdmd should be given a dual rating (UII). The area of Spa:rtina would be med a Categmy II while the relativdy undiscmbed upper manb. with native species would be a CategOiy L Do not, however, exclude the area ofSpartina in dctmnining the size threshold of l aae. D At le&% of the .landward.edge of the wetland has a 100 fl:buft'cr of shrub, faest, or un-grazed or un-mowcd grmslmd. 0 The wetland bas at least 2 of the following fcmun::s: tidal c:hannds, dtptcssions with open water, or comiguow: freshwater wcdand.1. ..--..-.,-....,. '"~ .rd c.t. I c.t. ll Dual rating 1/11 Wetland Rating Form-western Wamington venion2 18 August 2004 -~ --·-·-· ~ Wellarld name or mmm.A.i_ SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wdlands (ttep. 17) Natural Heritage wetlands have been idemificd by the Washington Namnd Hcrimge Prognun/ONR as either high quality undistmbed wetland., or wetlands that Suppcl1 state Tb:reatcncd, Endmgcml. or Seasitiw: plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland bein,g rated in a Secc:ian/T ownshipRmige that contains a Nanni Heritage wttlmd? (thu quatlon u used to settar out most situ before you need to cm,Jact WNHPIDNR) SIT/Rinfmmat:ion from Appendix D 181 or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site D YES 0-oonuct WNHP/DNR (= p. 79) and go to SC 22 NO 18] SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undistmbc:d wetland« as or as a site with.....,..,,_°' culang=d pJm,t ,pccics7 flYFS-C.atemrv I []No_notinaHcritageWedmd .... -........ _,._.. -,;,;--•--.. ; .•... -----····-. ··--. SC 3.0 Bogs ("" p. 17) Does the wetland ( er part of the wetland) meet both the am:ria Car soils and vegetation in bogs? U# 1M hybdow 10 WenttjytfthewetlandUo bog. lfyoa tutnl1a ,a yoa wlll still nttd to "* * w,dlmt4. 6aed tm lb jtmetltnu. 1. Does the unit have organic soil borizcm (i.e. layer, of orpnic soil). either pezitS or mucks. that compose 16 inches or mare of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (See Appc:Ddix B fir a fidd key to id:elltify organic soils) YesO-gotoQ.3 Nol8]gotoQ.2 2. Does the wcdaDd have mpnic soils, eilbcr peats or mucb that are less dum 16 ind:tes deep over bodroc.k. or an impen:neable hardpan sum as clay or volcmrlc ash, or that arc floating on ·a lake or pond? Yes O · gotoQ. 3 No '81-Is Dota bog ftlrpmposc of rating 3. Does the wcdaad bawmcn: dum 70%coverofmosscs at ground level, AND other plants, if prcscm, consist of the "'bog"' species listed in Table 3 u a significant component of the vcgcraticm (more dum 30% oftbetatnl shrub and herbat.cous cover consim of species in Table 3)? Yes 0-Is a bog forpmpose of rating No 0-soto Q. 4 NOTE: Jfyou are tmeatain about the extent of mosses in the DDdc:ntoly you may substitute that critmon by measuring the pH oftbc water that seeps into a bole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less thm S.O mid the "bog" plant species in Table 3 are present. the wetland is a bog. 4. Is the wed.mid fotcmd (> 30% COYCr) with sitb. spruce. subalpinc fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine. quaking aspen, Fnglernann's sprucc. orwestrm white pine, WITH my of the species ( or combinaticm of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 u a significant component oftbc ground cover(> 30% cov~~ of the total shru~rbaceous cover)? YES O •Categmy I NOD ls not a bog for purpose of rating Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 19 Cat. I ,i..,-_.,c .. Cat. I August2004 Wallnd 1mD1! or riua:iber //B SC 4.0 Fon:sted Wedaads (1tt p. 90) Docs the wetland have at least I mn of fOl'cst that meets one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forcsU as priozity habitats? if you muwu yes you will still nud to~~ wetland.~ on ttsfonclJon.r.. , D Okl-p,rwth forests: {west of Cascade acst) Stands of at least two tree species, forming a mn1ti-laycrcd canopy with occ:as:iooal small openings; with at least 8 trecsfaae (20 trces/hec:tmt) that arc at least 200 ycms of age OR have a diametrz at brcastbeight(dbb) of32 inches (81 an) or.~ · NOTE: The aitcrion for dbh is based on measuraneat:s fQI' upland fmcm. TWO:- bundred year old trees in Wdlandll will often have• smailcr dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DPW criterion is and "'OR" IO old-growth fmests do nCJt neccssariJy have to have trees of this diameter. . . -. D Mata~ forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the IDFSl ttteS me 80- 200 ycm old OR have a"YCrage dimtc:ten (dbh) acc:cding 21 inc!=:s (53an); crown cover IIl!I}' be less that l 00%; decay, dccadem:c. mm:lbcn of snags. and quanti1y of Imgo downed mattri,J u gm,nlly !es, 1hlm !Im! fomid In old-grow1h. (]YEs -Cmgmy I 181 N~ aot a~ Mm:lld wnh ,:pecial dmactaistic:s SC 5.0Wdlands in Coastal Lqvons (Sttp. 91) Does the wedmd meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a ooastal lagoon'? D The wetland lies in. a depression adjac:cnt to marino wm:rs that is wholly or pmtially scpmlltCd from marine waten by sandbanks, graffl bank&., shingle, or, less frcqucmfy, rod<, D The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or bntckisb. (> O.S ppt) during most of the year in at Imm a portic:n of the lagoon (needs to be~ near tM bottom) DYES •Goto SC 5.1 NO r81not a wetland ina coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Docs the wedand meet all of the following thn:c cmditians'l D The wedmld is rdati..Iy nndistmbed (has no diking. dild!ing. 611in& cultivation, gm:ing), and bas less dwi 20% cover of invuive p1an1 species (sec list of invasive species on p. 74). 0 At least % of the landward cdgo of the wetland has a I 00 ft buffir of shrub, forest, or un· ,.-,zed o,un-mowed gxmsland. 0 Thewcdand is large-than 1/10 Ba?: (4350 square feet) YES 0-Calegory I NO 0-Catogmy Il Wetland Rming Form -western Washingtoo vcnion2 20 Cat. I Angast 2004 r\c: ~ ...... ..,..-... .,. r-• ... '.-""< O:,·.•.;,,r,, ,--.... ,.,... ___ ,. Wedznd name or rrumbaM l-..~--~ SC 6.0 Interdun.al Wrtlands (sap. 93) ---.---. ~ Is tbewctlmd west of the 1889 linc (also called the Wcstcm Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? 0 YES =Go to SC 6.1 ~0-not an interdunaJ. wed.and for rating J/ you answer ya you will still aud IO rate 1M Wdlimd bad OIJ la fiuictJmu. In practical terms that meam the following geographic m:as: • Long Bead,, Peninsula -buds west ofSR103 • Gmylmd-Wcstport-lands west o!SR 105 • Ocean Shm"cs-Copalis-lands west of SR 11 S and SR I 09 SC 6.J Is the wetland.one acre or larger; or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is one acre ar 1.,ge<7 OYES•Cotcgocyll ONO goroSC6.2 SC 62 Is the wetland between 0.1 and I acre, eris it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 mid I aac.? Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 21 Cnll Cat;III NIA August2004 ,..._~ :-----··· ----, Wcdandnamc ornumi>erCb WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHJNGTON . Version 2 -Updmd July 2006 ID inaase accmuy and reproducibility mmllJ us:en Name of wetland (if known): Wetland CD Date of site visit:3/20/2007 & 3/21/2007 Rated by J. Cornwell Trained by Ecology? Yes[81 NoO Date of Training: 11/2006 SECTION: ll TOWNSHIP: llli..RANGE: 11; ls S/T/R in Appendix D? Yes_NoX Map of wetland unit: Figure2,.2A, 28, 2C, 20, 2E, 2F DRAFT SUMMARY OF RATING Estimated size: Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland II ill~ Category I = Score >=70 Category II= Score 51-69 Category III = Score 30-50 Category IV = Score < 30 IV __ Score for Water Quality Functions ~8 Score for Hydrologic Functions . 10 Score for Habitat Functions 18 TOT AL Scort! ror (unctions 46 Category based on SPECIAL CHARAClERISTICS of wetland II _. __ Does not Apply~ G Final Category (choose the .. big~est" catrgory rrom above) Check the appropriate type and dass or wetland being rated. . -·~~ot;~~ 1 ·;~ .. !~:. _:!"'."·:·,~~-~ Estil.arine Denrcssional Natural Beritar:e Wetland Riverine Bo• Lake-(rinee Matutt Forest Slo .... Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal La2oon Freshwater Tidal lnterdunal None of the above Check if unit bu multiple HOM dases nresent Comm~ts Refer to Photos 3 & 4; • 943 sfis the on-site area. Weiland Rating Fonn -western WashingtOn version 2 fX1 August2004 WcdmdA1mOoraumberCO Does the wetland being rated meet any of the criteria beloW!· If you ans~ YES to any of the questions bcIOw you wi!I need to protect the wetland ; according to ~e _regulatiOm reprding the special characteristics found in the wetland. •. '· ,;_.; .,,. ' .• . . . .. ··::~ .. '.. . . ·. ,m SP I. Has 1M wetland been documenled as a lwbil.al for any Federally listed ThreatetMd or Endangered animal or plant 1pecia (l'/E speciu)? For the purposes of this rating system,. ~documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wetland unit been documenJ.ed as habitat/or any Stall listed ThnallnM. or Endange.Ted animal 1pecia? For the purposes of this rating system, "documentect-means the wetland lS on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are categorized as Category I Natural Heritagc Wetlands ( sec p. ·19 of data fonn ). SP4. Does tM wetland have a local 1ignificanct in addi.tion lO its functioru1 For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need lo determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wetland being rated. The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland ftmctions. The Hydrogi:'omOrphic Class of a wetland can be determined ~ing the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Comments A formal habitat and species request has"not been submitted; however during the 3/20/2007 & 3/21/2007 field visits no priority habitats and species were observed within the wetland. Wetland Rating Fonn-westcm Washington version 2 2 Augus12004 unkn unkn unlm unkn f.v.:..aM L: .. ':J c::::z ~~ ...... ! IL,.:.: ~;~ CL11 ,...,...,, -~~.; .:._~~..: Weiland name or numbc:rC.i) Classification ofWttland Units in Western Washington 1. Arc lh.e water-levels in the wetland usually controlled by tides (i.e. accpt during floods)? C8JNO -go to 2 QvES -lh.e wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low 80W below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? 0 YES-Freshwater Tidal Friqe ONO -Saltwatu Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) If your wetland can be classified ai a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Ri~rilu wetltmd.t. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated.as an Estuarine wetiand. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the.· tint and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands w~ categorized separately in the earlier editions, and tbu separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept Please note, however, th.at the dwacteristics that defineCatcgmy I and II estuarine wetlands have clanged (seep. ). · 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the onJy source (>909!.) of water to it Groundwater and surface water nm.off are NOT sources of water to the uniL f,8JNo -go to 3 (]YES -The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classifie,1 as a "Fl.au" wet.land, use the form fot Dcpre55ioaal wetlands. 3. Does the wetland meet both of the following criteria? . D The vegetated part of the wcdand is on the shores ofa body of open water (without any vegetation on the SUJface) at least 20 aacs (8 ha) in siz.c; D At least 30% of the open waier area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)? f,8JNO -go to 4 DYES-The wetland class is Lah-frinp (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does lhe wetland med all of the following criteria? [8] The wetland is on a slope (slo~ con be very grodua/), C8l The water flows lhrough the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seep!. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. C8J The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface ..-o~r dou not pond_ In thue type of-tlands a.cept occasionally in vuy ~ and shallow tkpressions or l,,ehind hwnmock.r( tkpressions arr: usually <3fl diameter and less than I foot tkep). []NO • go to 5 C8]YES -The wetland class is Slope Comments Wetland Rating Form -wcstcm Washington version 2 3 August2004 ~ ~"' ... -.. -... ,,.--i ............... ~ ~ ---....,, ... ..,; ~ ;.,.. •• --..1 --·-i W~and name or number CO 5. Does the entire wetland unit med all of the following criteria? C8J The unit is in a valley, o·r stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river ["8J The overbank flooding occ~ at least once every two years. NOTE: ~ l"rW~ ""11 am conJaln depresstOIU that '11Y jilkd ..-ith ~r ..-hci the ri1IV' 1s not flooding. ONO • go to 6 C8J YES.:.:_ The wetland class is Riverine 6. Is the wetland in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surf.ace, al some time of the year. This means that a,ry outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. ONO-go lo 7 [EJYES -The wetland class is Depression al 7. Is lhe wetland located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding. The unit does nol pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious nattua..l outlet. [8]NO -go to 8 0 YES -The wetland class is Deprasional 8. Your wetland ~ to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base ofa slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, Or a small stream within a depressional wetland bas a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF TI-IE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED fN QUESTIONS J. 7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS fN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wcdarnfunit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10"/a of the unit; classify the wedand using the class that represents more than 90"!. of the tom! area. -----...:'-1:'._.u,.~l:i· ·--• ng Slope+ Riverine Riverine Slope+ Depress.ional Depressional Slope+ Lake-fringe Lake-fringe Deprcssional + Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Depressional + Lake-fringe Depressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to de:tennine which of the above aitcria apply to your wetland, or you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundaly, clllmfy the wetland as Deprcssioaal for the rating. Comments The wetland bas bttn nted u a depressional w/a strum flowing in. Wetland Ra.ting Fonn -western Washington version 2 4 August 2004 --:--'!' Wetland n&me or number C.D D D D D D D D D I.I Characteristics of surface wat.er flows out of the wetland: Unit is a dqnssion wilh 110 sllffice ~ leavina it (no oudet) points • 3 Wetl.md hu an illtmniUl:Zl1!y fiowinL ORhi&bly conmiaed, permanently OowinJ oudet points• 2 Wetland his an lftCCICIStrided. « sliJbdy c.ormric:ud, ·sur&i;:e outlet (pcnnanauly j/owlngj points • I Uni, is a "fla" dqnssion (Q. 1 m by), or m 1he Ft&tS dass, wilh pan,men1. surface outflow ad M ob~-aaturll o.det miVot oudct is a ntan·midil diich points "" I {Jffhtc}i iJ ftC/ ~/y j/,:,wmg ha/ UNI 4f ~~tlffll./yj/awi:ngH) Pi'owte photo OC".drawin, D 1.2 The soil 2 inches bclow the surface(or dufflaycr) is clay or organic (use NRCS tUfinitions) · YES points -4 NO "":f. points-0 D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation (emeigent, shrub, and/or forest class): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation>=:=· 95% of area points =-5 Wetland has persistent.. ungrazed, vegetatjon > = l/2 of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent. llllgrazed vegetation>"' 1/10 of area points= l Wetland has persistent. ungrazed vegetation <l/10 of aica points ""0 · 9' Cowardln · wigetation ·c:1asses DI .4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. This is 1he area of lM weiland 1hat u ponded/or aJ least 2 momhs, bu1 driu out sometime during the year. Do not count the ana that U pemiJ:mently ponded Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of JO yrs. · · Area sea50nally ponded is> lS total area of wetland points • 4 Area seasonally ponded is> \I., total area of wetland points= 2 Area seasonally ponded is< Y. total area of wetland points= 0 . :of.1-iydropertods Total for D 1 Add rhe poinls in the boxn above D 2. Does the wetland have.the opportunity to improve water quality! Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwa~ or surface watcr c.oming into the wetland that would othclwisc reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland? Note which of the following conditioris provu:k I~ sourcu of pol/uJ.ants. A uni I may hall pol_lutanls coming from several suurcu, but D'!)' single source would qualify as opportunity. 0 Grazin& in 1be wetland or v.;tmn ISO ft D Untraied ~ disc:bargcs to wetland Or LI led fields or orch..a within UO fl ofwedand 181 A szr=m or culvert dischaiJa into wetland tha dlllins developed MUI, n=sidenlial IIJQS, farmed fidds, roads. or dear-a4 loail'II 181 Residential, iab.-. mas, £01! courses ce·..;ttun 150 ft of\ffll,nd 0 Wetland is &d by plllldwater high in phosphorus or nitrolC'I !J."""' -~ YES multiplier is 2 D NO multiplier is 1 TOTAL-WaterQu.ality Functions Multiply the score from DI by D2 Add score to table on p. I 2 0 ' • 9 (1it't'p.<l<t) multiplier • 18 Wetland Rating Fomi -western Washington v~ion2 5 August 2004 Wed and name. ornwnberCP D D D D. D D DJ. Docs the wetland have the potential to redatt Ooodiag aad erosion! D 3.1 Chancteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland unit Unit is a depressioa with no surfaeo weer leaving it (no outld.) points• 4 Unit has an intc:rmittentl.y flowing, OR highly COMtriete:d pennmendy flowing outlet points • 2 Unit is flm depression (Q. 7 on key), or in the Flats class, with permanent surface outflow ud no otn-iom nalaral oadct and/ot is a man-made ditch · poinU • I (If ditch U not pt'l'ffl01lenlly jlowing treat 1111il os "in1f'rmillfflllyjlawing") Unit has an unconstric:ted, or slightly constricted, t.u!'.f'~ outlet (pmnanently flowin: ,inu•O D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods Estimate· the Might of ponding above tM bottom of the ouJlet. For uiuts with no ouJlet mei:r.nue from the surface of pennanu,t water or dupest part (If dry). Maries of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or boaom. of outlet points "" 7 The wetland is a .. headwater" wetland" points ""5 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to< 3 ft from swfacc or bottom of outlet points• 5 MaJks arc at least 0.5 ft to< 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points -3 Wetland is flat (yes to Q 2 or Q. 7 on key) but has small depressions on the surfac.e that trap water points• I Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft points• O D 3.3 Contribution of wetland to storage in the wi!J:enhed Estima~ the ralio of the area .. of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area oftlll! w"etland unit iuelf The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area ofwiit The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit The area of the basin i.s more than I 00 times the area of the unit Entire unit is in the FLA TS class points• S points= 3 points• 0 ,i.nts"" 5 Total forD 3 Add the points in the bou.s above D 4. Does the wetland blive the opportunity to reduce flooding and eroslonT Answer YES iftbe wetland is in a location in the watmhed where the flood storage. or reduction in water velocity it provides., helps protect dOWnstream property and aquatic re50w-ce5 from flooding oc excessive and/or erosive flows. Answcr NO if the water coming into the wetland is controlled by a struaure such as flood gate, tide gate, flap valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 9()0/e of the water in the wetland is from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding doe! DOI occur. Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. 0 Wetland is in a he.adwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems [81 Wetland dnins to a river« stream that has flooding problems 0 Wetland has no outlet and impounds surf4ce runoff water that might otherwise flow into a rivcr or stream that has flooding problems Otha __ IYES multiplier is 2 []NO multiplier is 1 TOTAL-Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add scor~ to tabll on p. 1 Comments ' 0 .,._ 5 (llt'p.<19) multiplier • JO Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 6 August 2004 ~~".*~ r-·--l:;;.: .. ,.:-:.i ~-·---;-:~ L.···"' ~ lv.--.-.-.~ t:._-~.:;,. ii,. ••• : Wetland name or nwnbel-ct ._.r_,,.. -~~~ the wdlanil havci-the potmti.al to provide habitaffor many species! H'l.l Vegetationstrugure(.uep. 71) Check the lypu of 11egetat1on classu presem (as dejiMd by COM1ardin)-Siu lhnshold for each class is V. acre or mon than /0% oflM area if unil is smalkr than 2.5 aau. D Aquatic bed · D Emergent plants ~ Saub/shrub (areas where shrubs have> 30-A cover) l8J Forested (areas where trees have>JO"Acovcr) If the unit has a forested class check if: l8J Forested areas have 3 out ofS strata (canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the rOR:Sted polygon Add the number of 11egetat1on IJPeS that qualify. ff you have: · 4 types or more 3 typcS 2 typcS Map of Cowari!in-vtigetalic.in classes points .. 4 point,-2 points"' I ! lyp, fats"" 0 H 1.2 Hydropcrjods (sap. 71) Check the lypes of water regimes (lrydroperlod.s) pre=t within the wetland The water regime har to COiier more than 10% of the wedmidor ¥, acre to count. (See tu1fordescnptionof hydrop,rlods.} D Permanently flooded or inundated 18J Seasonally flooded or inundated D Occasionally flooded or inundated 181 Satumod only 4 or more types present 3 typcS """" 2 types ,present points-J points-2 points -I 0 Pcnnanendy flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland f8I Seasonally flowing s~ or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland 0 Lltu--frilt6e 'llldhuul • 1 points -E__t:_q~Jj_llal Wdlmul • 1 points H 1.3 Richness of Plant Species (sup. 75) Count the number orplanl species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ff. (Different patches of the same species con be combined to mu.t the size threshold) You do 1JOI hat,e to name~ species. Do not include Eurasia" Milfoll. reed canarygrass, purple loosestnfe, Canadum Thistle. If you counted: > 19 species points ... 2 S ---19 species points-l List species below ifJ'OlJ want to: <5 species points a 0 Figurwl 2 -· 2 T otaJ for pagci Wetland Rating Form -weste:rn Washington version 2 13 August2004 ........... "' --,~· ..l ---, ~ L..,;,;.~·..,."' .,.._., ............ _ ...... :.,_._:...: - Welland nameornumberG H 1.4 Interspersion of habitats (seep. 76) Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes (desaibed in H I.I). or classes and unvcgctatcd areas (can include open wam or mudflats) is high. medium, low, or none. · · .~ .··. . ......... ·o·· @(Jay ..... , . @·'·~ ... . '• ' •;__ ' .. ~ ·-··--·-. 0 ,. ", .... · .. · None = O points Low= 1 point Moderate = 2 points / [riparian braided channels) High = 3 points NOTE: Ir you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water the rating is always "high". Use'n12p-cif:~ ~~dBSf~ H I.S Special Habitat Features· (seep. 77) Check the habitat features that ore present In I~ wetland. The rwmber of checks is th'e number of points you pul inlo the nat colwnn. ~ Large, downed. woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). C8J Standing snags (diameter at bottom >4 inches) in the wetlmd D Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft. (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends al least 3.3 ft (Im) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the lllllt, for at least 33 ft (!Om) 0 Stable steep banks or fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30 degr-ec slope) OR signs ofreceut beaver activity are present. (cut shrubs or trees 1hat halle not yet turned grey/brown) 0 At least V. acre or thin.stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg-laying by amphibians) C8J Invasive plants cover less than 25% or the wetland area in each stratum of plants Note: The W%stated in early printings a/the manual on paste 78 is an error Comments: H 1. TOT AL Score -potential for providing habitat Add the scores.from Hl.J, HJ.2, H!-3, H/.4, Hl.5 .. " .. .! Aguni~S 3 3 II Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 14 August 2004 Wdlawl nlllC or number CD H 2. Does the wuland have the opportunity to provide habitat for many sped.es!) .. H 2.1 DYffm (Stt p. 80) Flguni2; Choo.st. lht. dncripJlon 1ha1 bul rt.prt.senu com:bllon of bu.ff er of wt.dand The highest scoring Cnlt.rion that appliu to lhe wt.I/and is 10 be ust.d tn lht. ratmg. Su tut for definition of "11.ndis111.rbt.d." D 100 m (330ft) ofrdativdy undisturbed vegewod areas, rocky areas; or open water >95% of circumference. No sauctures arc within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no gruin& no landscaping, no daily human use) Points• D 100 m (330 ft) of rdatively undistUJbed veget&tcd areas, rocky areas, or open water >SC)"!. circumference. Points= D SO m (170ft) of relatively undiswrbed vege~ areas, rocky areas, or open w~ Points= 2 >95% circumference. 0 I 00 m (330ft) ofrdatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open watei- >2So/. circumference. Points= 0 SO m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for> so-;. circumference. Points= If buffer docs not meet any of tbe tbrec criteria above D No paved areas (except paved mils) or buildings within 2S m (80ft) ofwcdand > 95% circumference. Ligbl tO moderate grazing. or lawns are OK. Points• 0 No paved areas or buildings within SOm of wetland for >SO-I. circumference. Light to moderate grazing or lawns arc OK Points• D Heavy grazing in buffer. · Points• 0 VcgeWCd buffers arc <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumfcrcncc: (e.g. tilled fidds, paving, basalt bedrock e:ldcnd to edge of wetland) Points, D Buffer does DOt meet any of the aiteria ebove. ~ Points' Aenal ....:..o showinn.buffers" H 2.2 Corridors and Connection, (sN p. II) H 2.2.1 ls the wetland part of a relatively w:idisturbcd and unbroken vegetated conidar (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30% cover ofshrub.s, forest or native undisturbcd prairie, that c.onnccts to estuaries., other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that arc at least 250 acres in size? (dams tn ripan"an corridDrs, heavily wed grm,d roadJ, paved roads, an co~dcrt.d brt.ab in the corridor). []YES • 4 poiats (go to H 1.3) 0NO -go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 ls the wetland part of a relatively UDdisturt>ed and unbroken vcgctatcd conidor (either riparian or upland) that is a1 least 50ft wide, bas at least 30-1. c.wcr of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland, ifit does not have an undisturbed corridor as in I the question abo\'c? DYES-2 points (go 10 H 1.3) i81NO -H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 l.s the wetland: within S mi (8km) of a brackish or sall water csnwy OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 aai:s? ~YES -I ooint ONO -0 ""ints Total for pagc_L Wetland Rating Forni -western Washington version 2 15 August 2004 Wot..id name m numbs(.. D H 2.3 Nm PI adiacent to pthq priority babitm lidrd by WDFW (seep. 12) Whidi of thc following priority habillltl are within 330ft ( I OOm) of the wetland? (NOTE: tM connectio,u do no1 halle lo be rdatlwly undisttnwd. Thut. arc DFW dt.jJnJtions. Cltt.ci with your local DFW biololfst iftlwre ore anyquadon., gj _Ripariaa: The area adjacent ta; aquatic systems with fiowina water that contains clements of both aqllatic and tcm:strw ec:osystmns whidi mutually influmce eaeh Olhel". 0 Alpea StaalB: Pure m mixcd·~ofaspcn greatcrthan0.8 ha(2 acres). 0 Oil&: ~ than 7 .6 m (lS ft) high tind occning below SOOD ft. 0 Old-crowtb foresb: (Old-growth west of Cascade a-esa) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional $lJWI openings.; with III least 20 trees/ha (8 trees/m;:n:) > 81 cm (12 in) dbh or> 200 years of age. 0 Matvrc rorcs11: Stands with •VCfal!e diameters exceeding Sl cm (21 in) dbh; cro....,, cover may be len that 100-.4; decay, decadence, numbers of snap. and quantity oflqe dovmed material is gcnctal}y lest than that found in old-growth; 80 • 200 years old wesi of the Cascade crest. 0 · Prairies: Rdativdy undisturbed areas (a, ~cared by dominanee of native plants) 'Nhcfc grasses endlOI" £orbs form the natunJ climax plant community. D Tal•s: Hornogenousaieas of rock rubble ranging in avenge sizcO.tS: 2.0 m(O.S • 6.5 ft), composed of basalt, snde,ite, and/or scdimenwy rock, including ripr,p slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. 0 Cava: A nawrally occurring cavity, recess, void, or systelTI ofintcrconnccted passages 0 Orq:oa white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations when: canopy coverage of the oak component of the stand is 25%. 0 Urbaa Natani Opea s.,.e,e: A priority species resides withio or is adjacent to the open space and uses it for bJu:ding andfOf regular feeding; and/m the open space functions as a COffldor connecting other priority habitats, especially those Ihm: would otherwise be iMlated; andl'or the open space i1 an isolated remnant of natural hahltm lqer than 4 ha (10 acres) and is surrtnlrldcd by urban development. 0 E.h1ary/Eslv.ar,-4ikc! Deepwater tidal habitat, and adjacml tidal wetlamh, usually semi-enclosed by land but with open, partly obltt'Uded oc 'l)Oradic access to the open ocean, and in which ocean water is at lea.st occasionally diluted by fresh.water runoff from the land. The salinity may be periodically ini=ased ~ that of the open ocean by evaporation. Along 10me low-energy ooastlincs there is appreciable dilution of sea WIile!". Estuarine habita1 ~' upstream and landward to where ocean-derived salts rn=e less than O.SppL during the period of average aii.nual low How. Includes both estuaries and ht.gOOTls. D M.ariae/Eslaariae Shoreliacs: ShCN"dines include the intertidal and su.btidal =es of beaches, and may abo include the backshorc and adjacent components of the terTeStrial landscape (e.g., cliffs. snags, mature trees, dunes. meadoM) Ihm: are important to shoreline associated fish and wildlife and that contribute to shoreline function (e.g., sand/rock/1.os recruitment, nutrient contribution, erosion control.). If wetland has J or 111ore priority habitlllS • 4 poiats If wetland has 2 priority habiws • l poiab If wetlaod has I priority habitat• 1 poiat No habiws .. 0 points Note: All vegetatedwetkmds a~ by dt.finilion a priority habitat but art. not inclrahd Jn thl.t Ii.sf. N£arby wetlands are addrust.d in question H 1.4, Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 16 August2004 ["' ... , -c,._,~; C,M,:;; Wedaid rwnc: or number CD L--"~ L, .... r.--'. ~:.._.'.,.--'.i H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the o-de.script.ion of the landscapt. araund 1M wedand that but fits) (sup. 14) There u-e at least 3 other wetlands within \I,, mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, is is lake shore with some boating. but connections shouJd NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development points= The wetland is Lake-fringe on a W:c with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake- fringe wetlands within Yi mile points- There are at least 3 other wetlands within Yi mile, BUT lbe connections betwCCD them are disturbed points= The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other !alee-fringe wetlands within Yi mile points= There is at least I wetland within ~ mile. points= There are no wetlands within Yi mile. ~-ints - H 2. TOT AL Scor-e --opportunity foc providing habiw Add the scores in the column abOlle TOTAL for HI from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H I, H 2 and record the result on p. I Comments (__~,,.!J 3 7 II 18 Wetland Rating Fonn -western Washington version 2 17 August2004 rr .. :, ::;,]l tE,-:-~ llib:;J [,,;.~_;~ -, h'.-,~,-_._ .. c--·--, ·-~--_,, Wetland name« numbeJ (... D CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine. if the wetland mee.Js the attributes described below and circk the appropriate answers and Category. -~ We"tlaild,:Tyjie · ., ,.,·.~ • ·:.· :·- Ched: iiJ;~·c",:ite.ri~ ,,;il;'W'Jy,10.t!_,e 1111dkind... &ka. the 'appropriate Category (from Category drondhwr. mfflrl In Cafe..;.,,: .. ,cOi~J When lhi ;. __ ,:.:.rlirti" criteriCI on.met -. SC 1.0 Estuarine wed ands (stt p. 16) Docs the wel1and med the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? D The dominant water regime is tidal, D V egctated, and D With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. 0YES*'GotoSCl.l [8JNO SC I .I Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, cu.r National Estuuy Reserve, Natural Area ~e, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve-designated und~ AC 332-30-151? nYES = Cateeorv I o 20 to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES ""Category I NO= Category II Cat. I 0 The wc:tland is rdativdy undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation. Cat. II grazing, and has less than IO-!. cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Sparttno spp. are the only species that cover more than 10% of the wetland, then the Dua[ wetland should be given a duafrating(UU). The &rQ ofSpartina would be rated a rating Category II while the rdarively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a Category-I. Do not, however, exc!ude the area of Spartina in determining the urr size threshold of 1 am:. D At least :Y. of~ landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grax.cd or un-mowed grassland. D The wetland bas at least 2 of the following·featwcs: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. ... Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 18 ~ugust 2004 Weibnd -or oumber..cJ;? SC 2.0 Natural Heritaa:c Wdlands (seep. 87) Natural Heritage wetlands have been idcnrificd by the Washington Nlltllnil Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Thrcatmed, Endangered, <r Sensitive plant species. ' SC 2.1 Is the wetland beiog wed in a Sectionffownship/R.angc that ccmtains II Natural Heritage wetland? (zhis quation is used to screen ou1 most ntes befon you need to comact WNHPIDNR) SIT/R information from Appendix D [SJ or accessed from \VNHP/DNR web site 0 YES 0-contact WNHPIDNR (sec p. 79) and go to SC 2.2 NOl8] SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or ·endangered plant species? DYES'"' Category I 0NO_not in II Heritage Wetland SC 3.0 Bogs (setp. 87) Docs the wetland (or part of the wetland) meet both the aitcria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the lay below ro identify if the wetland 1s a bog. If you answr ya you will still need to rate the Wdkmd based on ilsfu~tions.. 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons {i.e. layers of organic soil), cithtt pew or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key 10 identify organic soils) YcsO-gotoQ.3 No[81gotoQ.2 2. Docs the wetland have organic soils, either peats or mucks that an: less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, OI that are floating on a W:e or pond? Yes 0-go lo Q. ~ No f81-ls 00111 bog for pwpoie of rating 3. Docs the wetland have more than 70-~ cover of mosses at ground level, "AND Other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 300!. of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes 0-Is a bog for pwposc of rating No O·so 10 Q. 4 NOTE: If you arc uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understmy you may substitute that: criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16'' deep. Ifthc pH is less th.an S.O and the ''bog'' plant species in Table 3 arc present, the wetland is a bog. 4. Is the wetland forested (> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, suha1pinc fir, western red cedar, wcs1em hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englcmann's spruce, or western white pine, WITH any of the species {or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover(> 30% coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? YES O = Category I NO D Is not a bog for purpose of rating Cat. I Cat. I Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 19 August 2004 WdhndnmzOl"numbcr (.b SC 4.0 Forested Wedaods (IU p. 90) Does the wetland have III lcast 1 IICl"C offin:st that meets one of these criteria fer the Department offish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yes )'OU will still need 10 rem the welland baud on itsfiu,&tions. 0 Old-crowtb forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two uec species, fanning a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with III lellSI 8 trces/llCl"C (20 trees/hcct.are) that arc 111 least 200 year, ofage OR have II diameter Ill breast height {dbh) of 32 inches (81 an) or more. NOTE: The ai1erion for dbh is based on measuremcnu fer upland forests. Two- hundred year old trees in wc:tlands will often have II smaller dbh because their growth rates" are often slower. The DFW aitcriOJl is and "OR" so old·growth forests do n01_neceswily have to have trees of this diameter. 0 Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest in,es arc 80- 200 years old OR have average diam.etm (dbh) exceeding 21 inches (S3an); aown cover may be less that 100-!.; dec.ay, decadcncc, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is gcncra11y less than th.al found in old·growth. [)YE.s • c.regory I ~ NO not a forested wetland with special dtarwuristict SC 5.0 Wcdands lo Coastal La:oons (sup. 91) Docs the wetland meet all·ofthc following aitcia of11 wetland in a coastal lagoon? 0 The wetland lies in II depressioo adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from muine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, '°"" 0 The lagoon in which the wetland is locared contains surface water that ls saline or braclcisb (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a ponioo of the lagoon (needs to be measurt:d near the bottom) • DYES -Go to SC S.I NO~ not II wetland in a coasta.1 lagoon SC S.I Does the wetland meet all of the following three conditions? D The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less th.an 20"!. cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 74). D At least% of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer ofsbJUb, forest, or un· grazed or un-mowed grassland. · 0 The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre (4350 square feet) YES (]a Category l NO 0= Category II Wetland Rating Form -western Washington vcnion 2 20 Cat. I August 2004 r'"'.'; ,.,---~ ... ·~-), r.;a.:,,.,~ lw,. ........... c: ... ,: Wetlmd n=,e or number GJ:) SC 6.0 Iaterdunal Wetbnds (sup. 91) ~ It,.~,._~,-_,; .---, ~-. "·------' ls the wetland west oflbe 1889 linc(aJso called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBU0)7 0 YES "' Go to SC 6.1 [8]No -not an inte:rdunal wetland for rating If yoa tl/UWa ya you will still null ID rate tlu wetbmd basal on 11:J f lllUtions. In practical tmns that means the following geographic areas: Long Beach Peninsu.la -lands west ofSR103 Grayland-WCSlpOrt-lands west of SR 105 Ocean Shores-Copalis-lands west of SR l 15 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is one acu or '"gtt'I 0 YES • Categoty ll ONO go to SC 6.2 SC 6.2 Is the wetland between 0.1 and I acre, or is it in a mosaic of wed ands that is between 0.1 and l aae,? D YES -Category m Cat"··-· .orwtt1aDdba.Kdon.S~:tlia.ncterutio·-·:.: ·:-·· · c,::';~ ·/ri~t~-ratini tf.~e·t~'/aifi'into~tiviiril ciitegories. ~ ffl;O,d on_p. /_._· ·,.--/.:;.:::··.,o '<._--,,--. ---~-' _ .. /,:\,:, .... -_.· __ '' . . If you llilSWcrcd·No:-{oi .U'types ~ ~Of AJJPlicablc"-,oriP.+ Com.meats Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 21 ,---. ·--·----' Cat.ii Cat.III NIA August 2004 ~ ' . ~-......... ; .••. ,;,J ~ .-.---···-·.-A -i>,.,, ••••• i :~ .. ,. . .'.; -. . -:-• ~~ --, -, "'" .. .-,! ,--,... ..,,.._ ••.• ·_.Q Wed.id nam,,ornumbcr~ WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHINGTON Vmian 2-Upda:led Juty 2006 co mi::reasc amncy and rcproducibili1y among mm Name of wetland (if known): Wetland E Date of site visit:3/20/2007 & 3/21/2007 Rated by J. Cornwell Trained by Ecology? Yesf.8l NoO Date of Training: I 112006 SECTION: ll TOWNSHIP: 23N RANGE: 5E Is S/f/R in Appendix D? Ycs_No~ Map of wetland unit: Figure2, 2A, 2B, 2c1 201 2E, 2F DRAFT SUMMARY OF RA TING Estimated size: Ca.tegory based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland IV 11 Ill i Category I ~ Score >=70 Category n "" Score 51.-69 Category Ill= Score 30-50 Category IV "' Score < 30 Score for Water Quality Functions ~2 Score for Hydrologic Functions 10 . Score for Habitat Functions 14 TOTAL Score for functions 46 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland . ' II_._ Does not Apply X Final Category (choose tbe .. highest" category from abo~e) G Check the appropriate type and class of wetland being rated. _,.,. .. .!t ~-ct~:t . Estuarine Denressional Natunl Heritue Wetland Rinrine Bo• Lake-frin2e Mature Forest Slo-- Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal l.atroon Freshwater Tidal lnterdunal None of the above Check if unit tw multiple HOM dasx:s "resent · Comments Refer to Photos 5 & 6; • 24,076 sfis the on-site area. Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 ~ ... ,lxl August 2004 Wdlmd -or numberj;[_ Does the wetland being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the 5PCC:ial characteristics found in the wetland. .. I' SPI. Has tM wetland been documented as a habitaJ/orany Federally lisW Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species (['IE s~ciu)? For the purposes of this rating system, ·documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state or federa] database .. SP4. fJMS tM wed.and have a local significance in addition to itsfuni;tions? For example, the wetland bas been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local managcmcm plan as having special significance.· To complete the neit part o(the data sheet you will need to det'ermine the !fydrogeomorphic Class of the wetland beinf rated. The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer hoW well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. Sec p. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Comments A formal habitat and species request has not been submitted; however during the 3/20/2007 & 3/21/2007 field visits no priority habitats and species were observed within the wetland. Wetland Rating Form-western Washington vmion2 ' August 2004 unkn unkn unkn unkn ~.-~ ,........, [,, .. ~-~ t.::.-~.~ E., __ m-~ .......-, _.._ .. -.. _., r:::::: ....-..... ~·---i.. •..• :...: Welland name or number~ Classification of Wetland Units in Western Washington I. Are the Water levels in the wetland usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during ~oods)? 18]NO -go to 2 DYES -the wetland class is Tidal Fria~ If yes, is the salinity of the water dwing periods of annual low flow below O.S ppt(parts per thousand)? DYES-Fnshwater Tidal Frin~ ONO-Saltwater Tidal Fri~ge (Estu.uiae) I/your we1land cmr be classified cu o Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms/or R~ wetlands. If it ts Saltwater ndot Fringe it is rated tu an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that wc:rc called estuarine in the first and second editi0Il$ of lbe rating system arc call~ Sall Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Qassificarion. Estuarine wetlands w~ categorized separately in the earlier editiom,· and !his separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain ~cy betwccu editions, the tttm "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, boweve., that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine wed.ands have changed (seep. ). 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is thc_only source (>9Q-!.) ofwacer to it. Groundwater and surf.ace water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit 181NO-go to 3 [JYE.S-The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as 11 "Flats" wetland, use the form for Deprasional wetlands. J. Does the wetland meet both of the following criteria? D The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of open water (without any vegetation 00 the surface) at least 20 aaes (8 ha) in sizz:; D At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft(2 m)'i' 0NO-go to 4 DYES-The wetland class is Lak.e--fringe {Lacuslriae Fria&e) 4. Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria? 0 The wetland is on a slope (slope can_be very gradual), 0 The water Hows through the wetland in cme dirc,;tion (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as shectflow, or in a swale Without distinct banks. D The water leaves the wetland without bein& impounded? NOTE: Surfau watu does not pond m thue ty~ of wetkmds except occasionally in very small and :shallow depressions or behind lrummoclcs( depr~tons are usually <Jft diameter and less than 1 foot dup). 13]No • go to 5 DYES -The wetland class is Slope Comments Wetland Rating fOim -western Washington venion 2 3 August 2004 .---. ;..._. -s.< :--0, ~ ........ ~~-=,":ii Wetlznd name or number £ L.c_;j ~ _,,,.,..,..,. ... 5. Does the entire wetland unit meel all of the following criteria? :----, -· ..... ~ -····-.J -; l8J The unit is in a valley, or stream charmd, where it getS inundalt.d by overbank flooding from that stteam or river C8J The oVerba.iilc: flooding occurs at least once every two years. NUTE: TM rrvuine unit con a:,,uain dqna:sio,u U,aJ a7efillcdv1th waur whten du rlwr is not flooding. []NO • go to 6 [8l YES -The wetland class is Riverine 6. Is the wetland in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is sarumed to the surface, at some time of the year. This memu that any Oldler, if present, i:s highu than 1M imerior ofthe·wetland. ONO -go to 7 181YES -The wetland class is Depnssioaal ?. [s the wetland located in a very flat area with no obvious depR:SSiOll and no overbank flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a ~ inches. The unit seems to be maiatained by high groundwater io the area. The wetland may be ditched. but bas no obvious aatural outlet [8INO -go to 8 0 YES -The wetland class is Depnssioilal 8. Your wetland seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, $eCpS at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine fioodplain, or a small stteam within a depressional wetland bas a zone offloading along its sides. GO SACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS l-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN TilE UNIT (.make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you ha.ve several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total azu of the wedan~ unit being rated. lftbe area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 1001. of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. '"!lliUill4oi:,ili!i<lfi@iliiii!f7~:m -"", --:-- Slope+ Riverine ·-Riverine Slope+ Ocpressional Deprcssiona1 Slope + Lake-fringe Lake-fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within bomi.dary Depres.sional Dcpressional + Lake-fringe Deprcssional Sa!t Water Tidal Fringe and any olher class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to dctennine which of the above aiteria apply to your wetland, or you have more than 2 HOM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depn:ssioaal for the rating. Comments : tbe wdJaud is rated depressioaal w/ stream Oowiag in iL . Wetland Rating Form -westc:m Washington version 2 4 August 2004 ~ Wetland name or numbcr_g_ D D D D D D D D DI. Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality! D 1.1 Chancteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: Uni1 is a dqx-mioii wilh no surface wuer leavina ii (!lo oudet) points -) Wedmd has m inlmnin=itly 001Wl& OR hisbJy constriacd, ~tly flowina osnlet poims -2 Wedmd has m la\COllStt'iacd, or sligb11y coastricbd. surface osnlet (pu,na,IQ,rly jl(IW/ng) points • I Unit is a '11•~ depression (Q. 7 on by); or ill !be Flm dass. wilh pamanenl surface outflow u11-•bvi-aaNnll Mdd 1V1dfor oudct is a man-mllde ditch poinu • I (ifditdl u no, pennanall}y.fl--lllJ l1'ur/ uni/ {U ·lnlumillallJy.Jlowin&.) Provide photo or d D 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface (or duff layer) is clay or organic (use NRCS definilioru) YES points -4 NO points•O D l.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation (emergent, shrub, and/or forest class): Wetland has persistent, ungrazcd, vegetation>":' 9S% of area points ""' 5 Wetland has pcI'Sistent, ungrazcd, vegetation> ..; 1/2 of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation>• 1/10 of area points= I Wetland has persistent, tmgrazcd vegcwion <l/10 of area points = 0 ' -. of>Cowardin:vegetation -~ D 1.4 Characteristics of seasona1 ponding or inundation. This is the area of the wetland that is pandedfarm least 2 manths, buJ dries out somuime during the ye.er. Do not count the area that is pe.rmaM-ntly pomkd.. Estimate area as the average condition .5 cnu of JO yrs. Area seasonally ponded is> ~ total area of wetland • Arca seasonally ponded is > V. total area of wetland Area season~.Uy ponded is < Y. total llfea of wetland lropefiods Total forD 1 Add tN! points in the bous above D 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality! Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduc.e. water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradiem from the wetland? Note which of 1he following conditions provuk the sources of pollutants. A unil may have polluJants coming from severol sources, bu.t any single source would qualify a.r opportunity. 0 Grazing in lhe wetland or wilhin 150 ft D UnnaICd 5lQlmWala-disdmps to wetland Dnlled fieldsorortbardsMIMI 150 ftof~ ~ A Stream or ad'fffl di,,dtaries into wedaad dial mains de\'dopcd aras, residential aeas, farmed fields, roads. or dear-cu,: Jogging • D Residential, uni.an aus, aolfcoursc:s are wilhin 150 ft ofwdland D Wr:tland is Ced by groundwater hi&h in phosphorus or nittogm o-_ {8l YES mu1tiplier is 2 D NO mu1tiplier is I TOTAL -Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from DI by 02 Add score to table on p. I l·(~p.J!}" F.gtre_?; D 2 I 0 Figun,1 • Flg~J· ' II (sup.U) multiplier • 22 Wetland Raring Fonn -western Washington version 2 5 August 2004 I Wedmdname~number {::. D D D D D D D 3. Does the wetland have the poffl:!da~ to red.ate flooding and erosion! D 3.1 ChaBcteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland unit Unit is a dcprcu:ion with no surface water leaving it (ao outlet) points• -4 Unit has an intermittently flowing, OR highly oonsttictcd pennancnlly flowing oullel points• 2 Unit i1 flat depression (Q. 7 °" key), or in the Flats clllSll, with permanent surf.ace outflow aad ao obviou aatand oadet and/or i1 a man-made dileh points• I (J_f di1dr ts not pumanendy ftovri111 treat Wlit as "inu.nni1te1ttfy jlowi11g~) Unit has an uDCOnStrictcd, or slightly consttided, IUl'face outlet (pc:rmanentJy flowing) poims • 0 D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods Estimate the height of ponding abovt the bottom of the outkl. For llltlts with no ou.tlet mWStire from the surface of permanent water or ~epest part (if dry). · Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the smfacc or bottom of outlet points • 7 The wed.and is a Mbcadwater" wetland" points = 5 Marb of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from swfacc or bottom of outlet points .., S Marks are at least 0.5 fl: to< 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points • 3 Wetland is flat (yes to Q 2 or Q. 7 on key) but has small depressions on the surface that mp water points• 1 Marks of ponding less than O.S ft points• O D 3.3 Contribution of wetland to storage in the watershed Estimate the ratio of the ana of upstream basin conlributing surface water to the lfletland to lM area of the wetland unit iUelf. · The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of unit points""' 5 The area of the basin is" IO to 100 times the area of the unit points= 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points= 0 Entire unit is in the FLA TS class points= 5 Total forD 3 Add the poinU in the boxu af?ove D .C. Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding: and erosion! Answer YES if the wetland is in a location in the Watershed where lhe flood storage, or reduction in water velocity it provides, helps protect downstream property and aquatic resow-ces from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Ans~er NO if the water coming into the wetland is con1rolled by a struaure such as ftood gate, tide g:a1C, Hap valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 90% of the water in the wetland is from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does DOI occur. Nol~ which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. D Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems D Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems D W edand has no outlet and impounds surfac.e. runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems Othe< -- !YES inultiplier is 2 []NO mu1tiplier is I TOTAL -Hydrologk Functions Mu1tiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add score to table on p. I Comments 2 • Fig-' ' 5 (sap.49) multiplier • 10 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington vmion2 6 August 2004 r.:. -:: '---·--· ~ .... _._ ... _.,. r.::--. -L--~ 11., •.•• ..,..J ...... ..,.,<,,O,i ~ ....... .,__,,. Wetlaid namc=ornumbcr_g_ 1::..·:-~:.~~~·_..:.,::,.<ll"i'' H 1. Doai the wetland ban tbe potential to provide lia:biut (Or maay spedes?'" H I.I Vegetation strncturc (.ree p. !2) Check. the typu of vegetation classes presurt (a.f ckfined by Cowardinj. Size threshold/or wch class is Y. acre or more than /()"A, of the area if unit is maikr than 1.5 ocns. D Aquatic bed 1Z1 Emc:rgc:nt plants C8'l Saub/sbrub (areas where shrubs bave>30-l.cover) D Forested (areas where trees have >30"!. cover) !J.!he unit has oforuted class check if: D Forested areas have 3 out of5 strata (canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, mOWground-cover) that each cover 20% within the forested polygon Add the. rrwnlnr of vegetation types that qualify. If you hmie: 4 types or more 3 types 2 type, Milp_d._Cowaidlri vegetation classes points-4 points-2 points• 1 I ·1u-o H 1.2 Hydroperigd! (stt p. 73) Check the types of water ngimes·{hydroperiods} present within the wetland ~ water regime has to covu more than/{)% of the wetland or Y.. acre to count. (See ~tforckscriplion of hydrop,riod,.) 0 Pcnnanc:ndy flooded or inundated 4 or more types present IZI Seasonally Hooded or inundated 3 types present D Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types.present 181 Saturated only D Permanently flowing stream or river in. or adjacent to, the wetland [8J Seasonally flowing strQm or river in, or adja.cmt to, the wetland O~eWdJmul:1pom.ts ~ _f'_ralnvalu tidal_ ..alizn4_..._ 2: 119ints ___ _ H 1.3 Rjchpes5 of Plant Snecies (seep. 75) points-3 points"' 2 points= l Count the number of planr species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ~. (Different patches of the same specW can be combi11ul lo mul ~ siu tluulwld.) You do not have to name the species. Do 1101 indWX Euraria11 Milfoi~ reui canarygrau, purph loosutrife, Canadimt Thisde. lfyou COWlted: > 19 species points -2 5 -19 species points -1 Ust species belaw if you want to: <5 species points -0 ,....--, Figure,! Agurea 2 Total for pa~ Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 13 August 2004 ,........., ..... ....,..,...,.. ~ -~-------,.._ 1t,,>r,.-,,. .. ,J ~ ....... V<.,"'-4 ----. ..--. •--·......W ,__.., Wedmd nane or number~ H l.4 Intqspqsion of habitats (seep. 76) Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes (dcsaibed in H 1.l). or classes and unvcg'etated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, medium, low. or none. C)@--o· -____ .--(W):_.,.,_.-,i''"'-,'.:-:._,__ @--·---~--·--, -.. !:};:: .· .. :_;.,~-· . . ;.··;"" ... ' None = 0 points Low= I point Moderate = 2 points .. A_-_" . . .. . ''! "' / (riparian braided cbannelsl High = 3 points NOTE: If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water the rating is always "high". Usei'nap'"of~C,Wiaidirl~-disses H LS Specjal ijabitat Features· (seep. 77) , • Chee le lhe habitalfeatures that are present In the wetland The 11wnbu of checlc.r is the number of points you put 11110 the nut co/.wnn. D Large. downed, woody debris within the wetJand (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). 0 Standing snags (diameter at bottom >4 inches) in the wetland 0 Undercut banlcs arc present for at least 6.6 fl (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at lease 3.3 ft (Im) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 ft (!Om) . D Stable steep banks of fine matcri.al that might be used by beaver or m\l$1cral for denning (>30 degree slope) OR signs ofrca:nt beaver activity arc present {CUI shnd,s or trees that have not yet turned grey/brawn) 0 At least Y. 11(,;re of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches arc present in areas that arc permanently or seasonally inundated (structu.rufor egg-laying by amphibians) D Iovasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants Note: The 20% stated 111 early printings of the marrual 011 page 78 is an e"or Comments: H 1. TOTAL Score -potential for providing habitat Add the s'coresfrom HI.I, Hl.2, Hl.3, HI._~. Hl.5 H 1.5 reed canrygrass dominates the herbaceous stratwn of vegetation. ..... v.....; Figun,1_5 3 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 14 August 2004 Wetland name or number~ H 2. »ors·tbe wetland bsve thii oppGrtanity.to provide habitat for many species!) .. H2.l ~(seep. &O) FlgUNj Choo.se rhe dncription that·best represents condilton ofb11.fler ofwedtuid. The highest scoring criterion that pppliu to the wedand Is io be wed in the rating. Su tuifor dt.finition of "11ndist11rbed. " D 100 m (330ft) of relatively undisrurbed vegetated·areas,-rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed pan of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no grazing. no landscaping, no daily hwnan use) Points• D 100 m (330 ft) ofrclativcly undisturbed vegctatc:d ~ rocky areas, or open water >50% circumference. Points• D 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open W8Icr Poirat! = 1 >95% cirrumfcrcncc. D 100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegewed areas, rocky areas, or open water >25% circumference. Points• D 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for > 50% circumference. Points• If buffer does not meet any or tbe three criteria above D No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland > 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points: D No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50"i. circumference. Light tO moderate grazing or lawns are OK Points• 0 Heavy grazing in buffer. Points• D Vegetated buffers are<2m. wide (6.6ft) for more than 9~% of the cirCWllfercncc (e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend lo edge of wetland) Poinb" 0 Buffer docs not meet any of the aiteria above. _ · Points• Aeriafrihoto showino·buffeR H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (stt p. &I) · . · • H 2.2.1 ls the wetland pan ofa tt!wivclyundisturbcd and unbroken vegcw¢ corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 300/. cover of shrubs, forest or native undistwbcd prairie, thM. connects to estuaries, other wedands or undisturbed uplands lhat are at least 2SO acres in size? (dams in rif'Orian corridars, heavily wed gravel roads, pt:r1Jed roads, are corrsitknd bretlb in the corridor). DYES -4 points (go 10 H 2.3) ~o = go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 ls the wetland pan of a rclati-vcly undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that arc at least 25 I acres in size? OR a Lakt-fringe wetland, ifit docs not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? , DYES "" 2 points (go 10 H 2.3) i,JNO=H22.3 H 2.2.3 ls the wetland: within 5 mi (8km) of a brackish or salt water esnwy OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture (>40 aacs) OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? 0YES = 1 naint ONO= 0 noints Total for page..L_ Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 " August 2004 Walmd ~ ormanbcf_f__ H 2.3 Nw m adiacmt to other m:iqrjty bmitata lined by WDFW (,a, p. 11) Wlucb of tho foUowing priority habitats ans within 330ft (IOOm) of the wetland? (NOT£: the conn«tiotu db not bm,e ID be rclatiwly undisturbed. ~ are DFW tkjinillons. Check with )l(Jllr loco/ DFW blologt,t If there are anyl/lludOtiS ISi Riparla•: The area adjaeent to aquatic l}'llemS with flowing WllCl'.thlll contains clcmentll of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence c:ach other.· D Aspea Studs: Pure oc mixed SW\ds of aspen greatef wn 0.8 ha (2 acres). D Oir&: Greaterwn 7.6 m (2S ft) high and «.eurring below SOOO ft. 0 Old-crow-da rorau: (Old-growth -.st of Cascade crest) Stands or at least 2 tree species, Conning a mu.lti-byt:red canopy ,.,.;th occasional small openings; with at least 20 trees/ha (8 trea/acn,)> 81 cm(32 in) dbh or> 200y=nofage. 0 Matunt l'ontm: Stands with avenge diamctcn cxcccding 53 an (21 in) dbh; c:ro1W1 co~ may be leis that 100%; dceay, dccadcnce. nwnbers or snags, and quamity ofW)e do..-ned material is gen,mlly less than that f'ound in old-growth; so·-200 years old west of the Caseadc crest. D Prairies: Rdm:i-..ciy undisturbed mas (as indic:91Cd by domirw1CC ofnmive planu) wt-gas,cs and/or (orbs form the rmmal cli~ plant community. D Tahu: Homogc:nousareasofrock rubble nmging in average siu:0.15-2.0m (0.5 -6.S ft), composccl of basalt, andesitc, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be D D D D D associll1cd with cliff's. . Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system ofinterc.onnccted passages Orqoa white Oak: Woodlands Stands o(pwe oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component of the stand is 25Vt. UrbH Natural Opea spa«: A priority species resides within or is adjacent to the open space and uses it for breeding and/or rcgu.1ar feeding; and/or the open. space functions a.s a corridor connecting odter priority habitats, especially those that would othcrwi,c be isolated; and/or the open space is an , isolated rcmn.am of mtunll. habitat larger than 4 ha (10 lla'CS) and is SWTounded by urban d=lop-. Est11ary/E.Jtaary-lie: Deepwater tidal habitats and adjacent tidal~ USWllly semi-cnclo,ed by land but with open, partly obstructed or sporadic IICCCSS to the open ocean, and in which ocean water is Ill least occasionally diluted by freshwater runoff'lrom the land. The salinity may be periodically incrcucd above that of the open ocean by ev11p0111tion. Along some low-energy coastlii:,es there is appreciable dilution of tea WllCI'. Esruarinc habitat extends ups;uum and landWllfd to where ocean-derived salts measure less than ~.Sppt. during the period of average annual low flow. Incl Wes both estuaries and lagoons. Mariac/Estuariae Sboretiaes: Shorelines include the intertidal and subtidal zones of beaches, and may also include the bacbhore and adjacent componcnb of the terrestrial landscape (e.g., cliffs. snags, mature trees, dune5, mezrdo.....::i) that are important to shoreline usociated fish and wildlife and that contribute to shoreline function (e.g., and/roclc/log rccniitmcnt, nutriCl\t contribution, erosion control). If wetland has 3 or mont priority habiws • 4 points lfwctland has 2 priority habitats• 3 poi•ts If wetland has I priority habitat • I point No habitats • 0 points Hou: A.II wgerattdttttlands are by definition a priorltyhabitaJ but an not inchltud in this list. Nuuby wttiantb art addressed in quulion H ].4, Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 16 August 2004 ~-~ ,---r-- !le••--.. ~ Wetland 11ame or numbet£ ~ ,---, ---------t~d -h~· ......... H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose t~ o~ ck.scnpnon of the laru:bcape around the. wetland that but fits) (sa JI-U) There are at least 3 other wetlands within 'h. mile, and the conuections between them are relatively undiSCUibed (light grazing between wcdands OK, as is lake shoR with somi: boating, but connectiOD5 should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development points C The wetland is Lalce-fiinge on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other Jake- fringe wetlands within \I, mile points ... There are at lea.st 3 other wetlands within \I, mile, BUf the connections between them are disturbed points= The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within \I, mile poin~ - There is at least I wetland·within \I, mile. points - There are no wetlands within \I, mile. points"" H l. TOT AL Score -opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores in the column abolJe TOTAL for HI from p~e 14 Total Score for Habitat Fnnctioas -add the poinu for H 1, H 2 md record the result on p. I Comments h,.,~,.-:-~A 3 6 8 14 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 17 August 2004 -~=----.. -~ _.. .......... ,,..-1 r--, ~ .... ~-.·-..... ~ -~'<'·-·-"" •• Wetland name or number _f_ ;~ ':-~ :.· ·--· .. CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle th~ appropriau. answus and Catqory. -- ;;:i4e~tiria,ii4! __ ~i}~;~i'sjkCt ,If! ap~:Ca.~ {from Category drofx}awn meiru m CO.tcgo,Y Colwiln),whc"n the ap/J1'0priatc cnieriO are ~t., SC 1.0 Estuarfoc wedands (seep. 86) Docs the wetland meet the following aiteria for Estuarine wetlands? 0 The dominant water regime is tidal, 0 Vegetated, and 0 With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. _ OYF.S ... GotoSCl.1 18JNO SC I.I Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park. National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or EducationaJ, EnviromDcntal, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30·151? nYES :. Category I ONo go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 ls the wetland at least l aczc in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES"' Category I NO • Category II 0 The wc:tland is relative:ly undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10-.4 cove-ofnon·native plant species. If the non-native Spartma spp. arc the only species that cover more tha.ii !We of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual ratiD.g (UII). The area of Spartina wonld be rated a Category II while the rdativdy undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area ofSpartina in determining the size threshold of I acn:. 0 At least'!. of the landward edge oftbc wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-gr.izCl:l"or un-mowed grassland. D The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal cbannc1s, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Cat. I Cat. I Cat. II Du,! rating VII Wetland Rating Form -westc:m Washington version 2 18 August 2004 Wedl!ld nsrne or number£ SC 2.0 Natu..-al Heritqe Wdlands (s« p. &7) Natuntl Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Narura.1 Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or SenJitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland being med in a Section/TownshipJR.ange that containJ a Natun.1 Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen our most sites be/on you need to contoct WNHPIDNR) . S/T/R. information from Appendix: D ~ or accessed from WNHP/DNR web sire D YES D -contact WNHP/DNR (sec p. 79) and go t0 SC 2.2 NOl8J SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a sire with state threatened or endangered plant species? nYES = Category I __ _DNO_not in a Heritage Wetland SC 3.0 Bop (seep. &7) DOC5 the wetland ( or part of the wetland) meet both the criteria fm-soils and vegetation in bogs? Use t~ key belO'W to ideruify if the wetland is a bog. If you answer ya )'OIi will still nttd ID rtIU tJte Wdland bttsttl on its /u~tions. i. Does the unit have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches ~fthe soil profile? (See Appc:odix: B for a fidd key to identify organic soils) YcsO-gotoQ.3 No[81gotoQ.2 2. Does the wetland have organic soili, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep Over bedrock,. or an impcn:neable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that ue floating on a lake or pond? YesO-gotoQ.3 • No[81-Isnotabogforpwposeo(rating 3. Does the wetland have more than ?0% cover of mosses at ground levd, AND other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a ggnificant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes 0-ts a bog for pwpose of ming No 0-go to Q. 4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understo,y you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a bole dug at least Hi" deep. If the pH is less than S.O and the ubog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog. 4. ls the wetland forested (> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann's spruc.e, or western white pine, wrrn: any of the species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover(> 30% coverage of the total .rhrublherbaceous cover)? YES O., Category I NO O ls not a bog for purpose of rating Cat. I Cat. I Wetland Rating Fonn -western Washington version 2 19 August 2004 WICllmd 1Wn1:1 or number _f_ SC 4.0 Forested Wdlaads (sup. 90) Does the wetland have at least 1 acre of forest that meets one of these aiteri.a fm-the Department offish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yts you will .rtill need to rate tM wetland based on its.functions. D Old-crvwtb rorats: (west of Cascade m:st) Stands of at least rwo tree species, fmming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre (20 treeS/b~) that are at least 200 yean of age OR have a diameter at breast heigbt(dbb) of32 inches(Sl an) or more. NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two- hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW ai.terion is and "OR" so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. D Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80 - 200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding21 inches (S3an); a-own co\'er may be less that 100"!.; decay, decadence, ruimbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally leu than that found in old-growth. DYES• Cale&ory I {81 NO not a forested wetland with special ehanlc:terillics SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (~ep. 91) Docs the wetland meet all oftbe following aitc:ria of a wetlmd in a coastal lagoon? 0 The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine wate:B that is wholly or partially separated from marine watcn by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less fmlucndy, rocks 0 The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains swfac.c water that is saline or brackish (> O.S ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (meds to be mea.nrid near the bottom) ' 0 YES •Goto SC S.1 NO [gJ not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC S.1 Does the wetland meet all of the following three c.ooditions? D The wetland is rmtively undisturbed (has no diking. ditching. filling, cultivation, grtring), and bas less than 206/. cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 74). D At l~t % of the landward edge oftbe wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un- grazed or un-mowcd grassland. 0 The \Yetland is larger than 1/10 acre(43SO square feet) YES [}> Category I NO 0-Category lI Wetland RAting Form -western Washington version 2 20 Cat. I August 2004 !;:,; .~ ~ _.. .... ,..,._,_ ... ..-.4 .......... f\,,.---.-~ ... Wetland iwne or nwnbe'~ SC 6.0 lntuduual Wdlauds (SU p. 9J) ,........, '-'-··------J -~--:--,.,.~ t...;J e~~ ls the wetland west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? 0 YES •Goto SC 6.1 ~O -not an interdunal wetland for rating ' If Jl(}Q an.swu :,a you will stJ1l nud tlJ rtlk tJu llldlan4 based on its funaions. In practical terms lfw means the following geographic areas: Long Beach Peninsula -lands west of SRI 03 Grayland-Westport-lands west of SR IOS Ocean Shores-Copalis-lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is one acre or l,rg«? 0 YES= Category II D NO go to SC 6.2 SC 6.2 Is the wetland between 0.1 and I acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and I acre,? D YES -"-"" m Categclry,Of~A~1!',~~~~S~t~.ti~-~-:.-_. ·· · · · ,.:··· Chooie the·~ hig/iui'!-: nitl7!8Jffeiilaiidfalli-1nto ·si,,uu/ caJegOries. and r«o,:d ... Onj,_..1._.. . . ·.,: ::::,_,-;i .:'.~~ _};_~,;;.:.'./.;/:_-:;·:, .... ·. ___ . _ . . If.you·answered·NO~fot:atI:~ enti:r.tNOl ·Applica!:ile" Otl p. L Comments Wetland Rating Form -west.em Washington version 2 21 ~: ..•. "~~ Cat.II Cat.Ill NIA August 2004 l!'.:":J:l ~ ~-oc·.•,-_,..,,j -:,, ... · ....... ~ .... ~.--~ :---, ~~ ... ,~.-:---, ----, ' Wetland name or number...£.. WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHINGTON Ven:ion 2-Updmd Jufy 2006 IO inciase acc:mxy Ind rc:prvducibility a:non& 11$e11 Name of wetland (if known): Wetland F Date of site visit·3/20f2007 & 3/21/2007 Rated by J. Cornwell Trained by Ecology? Yesi:8J NoO Date of Training: 11/2006 SECTION: ll TOWNSHIP: 23N RANGE: SE Is Sff/R in Appendix D7 Yes_NoX Map of wetland unit Figure2, 2A, 28, 2C, 20, 2E, 2F Estimated size: DRAFT SUMMARY OF RA TING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland IV II__!_ III Category I = Score >=70 Category II = Score 51-69 Category Ill= Score 30-50 Category IV = Score < 3.0 Score for Water Quality FUD.. ctions ~8 Score for Hydrologic Fwictions 16 Score for Habitat Functions 23 TOTAL Score for functions 57 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland II __ . Does not Apply :/5. 0 Final Category (choose the "bighest" category from above) Check the appropriate type and class ofwrtland being rated. --.~-·.-i!t;, " " • <t[ini .. --~~~-• .. Estuarine Dt:oressional Natural Heritae:e Wetland Riverine Bo• Lake-friul!:e Mature Forest Sloruo Old Growth Forest Fbts Coastal La2:oon Frubwater Tidal lnterdunal None of the above Check if unit has multiple IXI HOM classes nraait Comma.ts Refer to Photos 7-10; • 58,409 sf is the on-site wetland area. Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 August:2004 Wdbnd-o,-i:iumber.f_ Docs the· wetland bciOg rated DICct any of the criteria below! If you answer YES to any of the questions· belDw you ·will need U) protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland . . : _· "".. ,· . ' . . . ' ,. . . ' .,_ . Has the wetland been documenwl as a hal?itmfor any Federally listed Threatened or Endange"rui animal Or planJ speciu (l'/E spedes)? For the purposes of this rating sys~m. •documented" means the wetland is oo the appropriate state or federal database. SP2. Has IM. ~et/and uni/ been documenJ.ed as habitat.for any State listed Threatened or Endangered an.lmal speciu? For the purposes ofthis rating system, •documented• means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species arc categorized as Category I Natura.I Heritage Wetlands (seep. 19 of data form). SP4. Does thewedandhave a local signifi~e in addition ta itsfunctio~ For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significana:. To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need lo determine the ffydrogeomorphic Class ofthe wetland being rated. The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hyd,rogC4?mClrpbic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed fustiuctions on classifying wetlands. Commcots A forma] habitat and species request has not been submitted; however during · the 3/20/2007 & 3/21/2007 field visits no priority habitats and species were observed within the wetland. Wetland Rating Form-western Wuhington version 2 2 August 2004 unkn unlcn unlcn unlcn ...,...,.,. ..... _"'"-".....I r---,. •.•• ~ • ..t t'.c;'.,~ r.::~.: L;., .. ,.; l----,C~ p,;.;;,! Wdfand nameor11umber__!:_ Classification o(Wetlan~ Units ~n Western Washiogton -.,.,.,.,j I. Are the water levels in the wetland usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? [8lNO -go to 2 DYES -the wetland class is Tidal Fringe -r,.--...........;,,J If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow be!ow 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? D YES -Freshwater Tidal Frinze ONO-Saltwater Tidal Fri.age (Estuarine) If your we:rkmd can be classified as a Fruhwater Tidal Fringe use t~ forms for RillV'iM well ands. If ,tis Saltwater Tuia! Frir,ge 111s rated as an Estuarine wetland Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system arc called Salt Wacer Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Esmarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency bctwcc:n editions, the term -Estuarine" wetland is kepl Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Catcgc.y I and U estuarine wetlands have c.bangcd (seep. ). 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source {>90%) of water to it Groundwater and SW"face watCf nmoffare NOT SOW'CCS of water to the unit. C8]NO -go to 3 DYES-The wetland class is Flab If your wetland can be classified as a"~" wetland, use the fonn for Deprcssiopal wetlands. 3. Docs the wetland meet both of the following criteria? 0 The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores ofa body of open water (without any vegetation on the surface) at lease 20 aacs (8 ha) in size; · D At least 30%ofthc open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)? [8lNO-go to 4 []YES-The wed.and class i.s l..ake--(rin1e (Lacustrine Frina:c:) 4. Docs the wcdmd med aU of the followingaitc:ria7 D The wetland is on a slope (slo~ cOl'I M very gradual), D The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as shectfl.ow, or in a swale without dininct banks. D The water leaves the wetland without beinc impounded? NOTE: Surface watu does not poml in d!ue IJ,pe of Wetlands except "occasionally in "ery small and shallaw depreuio,u or be.hind hummocks( depressions are ·usually <3/t diameter and less than I foot deep). C8]NO : go to 5 []YES-The wed.and class is Slope Comments Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 J August 2004 teL-21 ~;, _ _cj 1t,,,.;-.,..,......;,i ,-·-··-., _,.._ l....:_.~re~;i ~ t.: .•... ) ~. Wetland n.ime or number£ 5. Does lhe entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? [8] The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbaok: flooding from that stream or river from that stt [81 The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NOTE: The riwrlM unit can conlQin dq,nssiom that an filled with water wMn thr nvu is nQtjlooding. ONO -go to 6 [8J YES-The wetland class is Rivc:riJie 6. Is the wetland in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the swface, at some time of the year. This means that any 0u1Iet, ifpresenl, is higher than the interior of the waland. []NO -go to 7 [81YES -The wetland class is Dc:pressional 7. Is the wetland located in I very flat area with DO obvious depression and no ovcfbaok: flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater i.n the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. [SJNO -go to 8 D YES -The wetland class is Dc:p~sional 8. Your wetland seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains sevcra1 different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riveriae floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone offlooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1·7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the sec;;ond column represcits 10% or more oftbe total aru of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 U less than IO-/. oflhe unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 9()-/e o(the total area. wllfii._,.t,W.J:!lil'.(~.!P.iil?.~mff~::'.!~ .. ;;;_ .. .~;.~@-k~<"dlh<l<l>..i.-'1 Slope+ Riverine Riverine Slope+ Depressiona1 Oepressional Slope+ Lake-fringe Lake-fringe Depressional + Riverine a1ong stream within boundary Dcprc:ssional Deprcssional + Lake-fringe Depression.al Salt Wattt Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE undc:r- wetland wetlands w/tb special characteristics If you arc unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundaJy, classify the wetland as Depressicnaal for the rating. Comments the wedand is rated deprc,sional with a stream flowing in. Wetland Rating Fonn -we5tem Washington version 2 4 August 2004 ----:--i-1 _.) Wttllnd iume ot ru.irnber .E_ D D D D D D D I.I Clwu:tcristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: Uni1 is adq,Rssion wilh no surface wit=' leaving ii (no oiidet) points• 3 weti .. d bas .i iatefndently nowiria. ORhi&h):y ooamic:tcd, pe:nmnmlly flowing oirdet poims • 2 Wmand bas al immnmicled, or ll.iJhdy coastriaed, siaf.ace outlet {pumarrailly jlowtng) poinU • I Uni! is a "O.at" dqn:$sion (Q. 7 on key). cir in the Flm class. wilh permanent surface outflow and na .m .. aatanl oa1kf and/or outlet ii a =·macle ditch points• I (ifdildl IS not~flowln( tnD1 l<ftll lU -lnla-mJtunt/y .flowing~) ~-photo (JI. D L2 The soil 2 inches below lhc swface (or dufflaycr) is clay or organic (use NRCS definitiom) • ' · YES points~ 4 NO points-0 D 1.3 Characteristics of pc~isknt vegetation (emergent, shrub, and/or forest class}: Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation> = 95% of area points= 5 Wetland has persistent, ungraz.ed, vegewion > = 1/2 of area points:::: 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation>= 1/10 of area points= I Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation <1/10 of area. . points"".' .o M8J).of ~OWZlrdin, vegetatiOn-Clas~s DI .4 Charatkristics of scasonaJ ponding or inundation. This is the area of the wetland that is ponded/or aJ least 2 months, bur dries out sometime during the year. Do not counr the area that is permanently ponded Es11mate arur as the ave1"1ge condition 5 OUJ of JO yrs. Arca seasonally pOnded is> 14 total area of wetland Area seasonally ponded is> V. total area of wetland Are.a seasonally ponded is < V. totaJ area of wetland points= 4 points= 2 points =O -1ioi,eriods Total forD 1 Add the points in the bous abuve D 2. Does the wetland bne the opportunity to improve water quality? Answer YES Uyou know or believe thc:rc arc pollutants in groundwater or swf.ace water coming into the wetland that would otheiwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradicnl from the wetland? Nole which of the following conditions provuic the sources of po/lulants. A unit may have pollutanlS commgfrom several sources, bur a191 single source wmdd qualify as opportunity. D Orazina: m lbe wetland or within I so ft D 0ntrcaee1 storm"1lter dischJrges m -1m1i 0Tillcd fields or orc:hards within 150 ft ofwetlmd 0 A stream or culvert disdwcc into ~d lb.al drains developed area, residential areas. farmed fields, roads, or dear-cut Joggina 0 ~dential, urban aias, golf-arcwilhin 150 ftofwdl.and 0 Wetland UI fed by pvundWlltr high in phosphona or nitrocm oo,,a_ [8] YES multiplier is 2 ONO multiplier is 1 TOT AL -Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from D1 by D2 Add score to table on p. I Flgure,ti> 2 0 '"' ' ~ • 9 <-P.·") multiplier i 18 'Wedand Rating Form -western Washington version 2 5 August 2004 Welland narm or mmiber£_ D D D D D D D 3. Does the wetland haVe the potential_ to redocc Oooding and erosion! D 3.1 Clutracteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland unit Unit is a depression with no surface WZl1C:I' leaving ii (no outlei) poima • 4 Unit has an inlc:rmittently flowing, OR highly ecmllricted permanenlly flowing OU!lei · poinu • 2 Unit is flai depressioa (Q. 7 on key), or in the Flab class, with permanent surface outflow and no abvioas aataral oudct and/or is a man-made dileh poi!WI • I (If ditch Is not pemwnulJly jlqwing tnat 11nit os "inllnnitlollly jlqwmg") Unit has an unconstri~ 91"_,lighdy consbicud, surface outlet D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods flowi: ,inlJ• 0 Estimare the height of ponding above the bottom ·of the OUJ!ct. For uniu with no ouJlet measure from the surface of pcnnancnl water or deeput part (if dry). Marks of ponding arc 3 ft or more above the swface or bottom of outlet points• 7 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland" points = 5 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to< 3 ft from swf.ace or bottom of outlet points .. 5 Muts arc at least 0.5 ft to< 2 ft from smfacc or bottom of outlet poinu • 3 Wetland is flat(yes to Q 2 or Q. 7 on key) but has small depressions on the swiacc that trap water points • I Marks of ponding ICS5 than 0.5 ft points• 0 D 3.3 Contribution of wetland to storage in the watershed Estimate the rali.o of the arra of upstream basin contn'buting surface water 10 the wetland lo the area of the wetland unil itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of unit The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of thi unit The area of the basin is more than I 00 times the area of the unit Entire unit is in the FLATS class points"' 5 points"" 3 points-O ,ints-5 Total forD 3 Add the po_ints in the box.es above D 4. Does the wetland have the opportunity to redocc flooding and erosioo.? Answer YES if the wctlaod is in a location in tbcwatenhcd whcrc the flood storqe, or reduction in water velocity it provides, helps p~tea downsnam propcny and aquatic_ resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate, tide gate, flap valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 909.1. of the water in the wetland is from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur. Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. D Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that bu flooding problems [83 Wetland dwns tea river or stream that has flooding problems D Wetland bas no o~tlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems Othe< -- YES multiplier is 2 []No Add score to table on p. I Comments 2 ' FlgUl'II ,. l 8 <-p.'9) multiplieT • 16 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 6 August 2004 ........ ......... ,,, ... ~ °''""'""""' ,-~-.-_·-_.;.;. r.::::::: c..: ... -..-.~-----~ IZ-IJ C,.c.4 Wdiznd name ornwnber_.E._ HU Vegetition structure (sup.--71) Checlc the types of veplation Clas.Rs pruent (as defined by Cowardin)-Size threshold for wch class ;s ¥, acre or more lhan JO% of the area if unit is smaller than 2 . .5 acres. D Aquatic bed C8] Emergent plants C8J Scrub/shrub (areas where shrubs have >300/. cover) t8J Forested (areas where trees have> 30"'" cover) I/the writ hasaforutedclass checl:. if ~ Forested areas have 3 out of 5 strata. (canopy, sulH::anopy, shrubs, bcrba~. moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20-1. within the forested polygon Add lhe number of vegetation types that qualify. If you have: 4 types or more Jtype, 2 type, Mai, d Cowatdlri.vegetatjon classes points= 4 · points=' 2 points"" I I -o H 1.2 Hydroperiods (sup. 7J) Checlc tM typuofwater regimu(hydropuiods) pruortwithfn th, wetland. The wmerregime has to cover more than /0% of the wedandor ¥, acre to ccnmJ. {Set: tutforckscription of hydro!)'nods.) D Pc:nnanendy flooded or inundated [8] Seasonally flooded or inundated D Occasionally flooded or inundated [8] Saturated only . 4 or more types present 3 type, -2type,p,e,,mt points= 3 point,= 2 points= I D Pcnnanently fl.owing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wc:tland t8J Seasonally flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland D Lau-frlnp»dbuul• 2 polaas -Fraltwrttn~waland-2 points H 1.3 Richness of Plant Specig (sup. 75) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that CO\ll:I" at least IO ft1. (Different pa1chu of the same s~ciu can be combined to mut the size threshold) You t:/Q not have lo name the fPl!Cres. Do not include Eurasian Mi/foil, reed canarygrass, purple loosutrtfe, Canadian Thistk If you cowited: > 19 species points"' 2 5. 19 species points -I Ust s~ciu bdow if you wan1 to: <S species poinu -O CZ!l: _.., 4 _,.,.., 2 2 T otaI for page! Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 13 August2004 ~'2'.':!'l ~ ~ .,.;.,.,-.-.....: ~T3 it;:..;::.i L:~-~":1. ,......., .-.,. ....... ·"·-·.h,I Wdlmd namearnumbef.£_ H l.4 lntmpqsion of habitats<-p. 76) Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes (described in HI.I), or classes and unvcgetated areas (can i~lude open water or mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none. ~~~ o~~~ None = 0 points Low= 1 point Moderate = 2 points / [ riparian braided channels} =3 points NOTE: If you have four or mon: classes or three veger.ation classes and open water the rating is aJways "high". ~.map·at_~w.ig~ -~ H l.5 Special Habitat features: (seep.. 77) Check the habitat features drat are present;,, the weiland The ,rumber of checks is the ,ru;,ber ~points you put into the nat column. 18] Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). [81 Standing snags ( diameter at bottom >4 ·inches) in the wetland D Undercut banks arc present for at least 6.6 ft. (2m) and/or 011emanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (Im) ovet" a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit. for at least 33 ft (IOm) 0 Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs ofrece:nl bca11er activity are present (cut shnibs or trees that have not yet lllrnt:d gre)ibrown) [8J At least'/, acre of thin-stemmed persistent 11egetation or woody branches arc present in areas that arc pennanently or se.ason.ally inundated (structures for egg-laying by amphibfcms) [@Invasive plants co11er less than 25% of the wedand are.a in each stratum of plants Note: The 20% stated tn early printmgs of the manual on page 78 is an error Comments: H 1. TOTAL Score' -potential for providing habitat Add the scores from HI.}, Hl.2, HJ.3, HJ.4, Hl.5 .i ~ Flg\lre1 ., 4 IS Wetland Rating Fonn -western Washington 11crsion 2 14 August 2004 Wed1r1d name cc number£ H 2. Docs tbe wetland have tbe opportunity to provide habitat for many sptties'!J H 2.1 Buffers {.stt p. 80) Choose tht. 12scription that best nprt.sents condi11on of buffer of wetland The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used In tht. ronng. See tut/or defin/llon of "uw:ifsturbed." 0 100 m (330ft) ofrdativdyundisturbcd vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% ofcircumfc:rcnce. No struaurcs·arc within the undisturbed pan ofbuffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no grazing. no landscaping. no da.ily human use} Points, D 100 m (330 ft) ofrdativdy undisnubed vegewed areas, rocky a,cas, or open water >500.4 cimnnfcrence. Points" 0 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% circumfcu:nce. · Points., D I 00 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >25% circwnfcu:nce. Points a D so m o 70ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated arw, rocky areas, or open _water for> 50% ciramifc:rmce. . Points " Ir buffer does not mttl any of tbe three c:riteria abon 0 · No paved arcas(except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland > 95% circumfermce. Light to moderak grazing, or lawns are OK. D No paved areas or buildings Within 50m of wetland for>SO% circumference. Light to moderate grazing or lawns are OK • D Hea..y grazing in buffer. D Vegetated buffcn III'C <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled fidds, paving, bawt bedrock extc:nd to~ of wetland) [81 Buffcs-docs not meet any of the ai1cria above. · " Aeii&i'ptiotci "showing butfers H 2.2 Coriidop and Connections (sttp. 81) . . Points• Points• Points• Poinu, Points' H 2.2.1 ls the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30-/o cover of shrubs, forest or native undisrurbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that ate at least 2so· acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, JX!l'ed roads, au consil2rt:d brt.aks in tht. corridor). []YEs"' 4 J)Oints (go to _H 2.3) ~O •goto H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 ls the wetland pan of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, has at least 300,.{, cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 aaes in size? OR a La~frince wetland, if it does not have an undiscurbed corridor as in the question above? [;8lYES "'l points (go to H 1.3) [lNO = H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 ls the wetland: within 5 mi (8km) of a brackish or salt water esnwy OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasrure (>40 acres) OR within I mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? [8JYES -1 point []No• 0 points ' Flo=i 3 T ota1 for page .A_ Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 15 August 2004 Wetbnd name or number£ H 2.3 Near Of adj,ec;m; I9 ettm: prjorjty bfflW lim,;1 by WDFW (uir p. 11) Which of the following priori!y habitats are within 330fl: (I OOm) of the wetland? (}{OTE: the connections d,:, not hmie to be relatively IIJldistu~ 11,~e are DFW thfinit/OTIJ. Chect with }'Oflr local DFW biolagut If there are any quutJons 181 D D D D D D Ripari•n: The area adjacent to aquatic l)'stem, with flowina water thst comains elemt.nU of both aquatic and tcrrestria1 ecosystemS vmich muwal}y influence each other. Aspen St..acb: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than o.a ha (2 1Cfe3). OilTs: Greater thaa 7.6 m (2S ft) high and oceurring below SOOO ft. Old-p'-owda forests: (Old-gn,wth WEst of Cascade aest) Staar:b of II least 2 tree species. forming a multi-layered canopy with oc:casianal small openings; with at least 20 ~ (8 trees/acre)> 81 an (32 in)dbh or> 200years ohge.. Ma.tan lonsta: Stands with average dimneters eJtCteding Sl an (21 in) dbh; crown cover may be less that I 00%; decay, decadence, num_ben of snags. and quantity of large dov.-ned material is gcner:ally less than that found in otd•growth; ao . 200 years old west of the c.scade crest Prairies: Relativdy undisturbed area (u indicated by domirutnCC of native planu) ~ ;ruse, and/or forbs form the natural dimu plant commimity. Talas: Homogenous areas of rock rubble rmiging in ~e siz.c 0.1 S -2.0 m (O.S • 6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andcsitc, mid/or secii.=tary rock, including riin? slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. · D Caves: A naturally ocauring cavity, recess. void, or system ofintcrconni=cted passaga 0 Orqoa wbite Oak: Woodlands Stands of~ oak or oalc/conifer associationJ where canopy ,;:ova-.gc of the a.le component of the swlCI it 2.5%. 0 Urta.a Natani Open SpKe: A priority specict resides within.or is ~j.:au to the open space and llSC:S it for breeding and/or regular feeding; and/or the open space functions u • comdor connecting other priority habitats, especially those that \\()uld otherwise be.isolated; and/cc the open space is an isolated remnant ofnan,r.t habitat larger than -4 ha (IO aaes) and is swrowlded by urban development. 0 En11.ary/Eat•ary-lh Deepw.:er tidal habitats and .djaccnt tidal wetlands, usually semi-enclosed by land bu1 with open, pmtly obstruc:tcd cc sponrdic aa:es;:s lo the open ocean, and in which ocemi wsw:· it at. least oc:easionaUy diluted by freshwater nmoff from the land. The salinity may be petiodically incn:ased above that of the opcn ocean by evaporation. Alona some l~gy coastlines there is appnciable dilution of --=. Estizarint. habitat extends upstream and h1ndwal'd io 'Mlere ocean-derived salts measure less than 0.5ppl. during the period of average a!Ulwil low flow. Includes both estuariet and lagoons. D Muiae/Est11.ariae Shorelines: Shorelines include the intertidal and subtidal :.ones ofi-che1, and may also include the b~tll'e and lldjaccnt components ofthc terrestrial landscape (e.g., cliffs, snags. mature uces. dunes, meadow,) that are imponam to shoreline associated fish and wildlife and thll contribute to shoreline function (e.g.. sandlrocltnog recruitment, nutrient contribution, erosion control). lfwelland has 3 or more priority habitats--4 poiab If wetland has l priority habitilU • 3 polnu If wetland hast priority babiw • J point No habitats• 0 points Note: All vegetated wetlands are by dt.finltlon a priority habJlat Intl are not includt.d Jn lhis /Isl Nearby wetlands are addressed ;n qz,ation H 2.-4, Wetland Rating Form-western Washington version 2 16 August 2004 r":"":'. r"'"~ f'".:.:::: Welland name or numba' £_ ,....... b-.,-..-.-..... L, .: ,---. lo.-.-.-,,._ ~ H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the q-description of the landscape around the wetland that but fits) (sup. 14) There are at least 3 other wctland5 within Yz mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisnubed (light~ between wetlands OK, as is Jake shore with some boating, bul connectiom should NOT be bisected by paved roads., fill, fields, or ocher development points= The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake- fringe wetlands wilhin V.. mile points= There are at least 3 other wetlands within Vz mile, BUT the connections between them are disturl>ed points- Tbe wedand is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake--fiin.ge wetlands within Yz mile points- There is at least 1 wetland within V., mile. points• There are no wed.ands wilhin Vi mile. rv-oints- H 2. TOT AL Score -opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores In the colu,rrn above TOT AL for H I from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H I, H 2 and record the result on p: l Comments ~ ... ,_,-.;v •• .,,., 3 8 " 23 Wetland Rating Fonn -western Washington venion 2 17 August2004 ::.·.: ..... ... ).......,.,_ .. .---, :.... ....•.. ! Wet.laid name or number£ ---. ~ -·:~ CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Catqory. ;,,·_, ____ ;:: ,_Wetl.lUJd:Typt--· :i~~i?ti:i":):ffJ;:lt}~:~;5j£j;}j:;:r,:rtt~r~0 ~:~·- ·· c~.1qory SC I.0 Estuarine wetlands (seep. 16) Does the wetland meet the following aitcria for Estuarine wetlands? 0 ThC dominant water regime is tidal, 0 V egctated, and D With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt DYES =Goto SC I.I [8]NO SC 1.1 ls the wetland within a Nationa.l Wildlife Refuge, National Park. National Estuary ResCJVC, Natural Area~. State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated UDdcr WAC 3 32· 30-151? nves "'Category 1 []No go to sc 1.2 SC 1.2 ls the wetland at least I acre in size and meets at lean two of the following three conditions? YES = Category I NO'"' Category II D The wetland is rdativdy undi5turbcd (has no diking, ditching. filling, cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10"!. cover of 1,"101H1.1tive plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover more than 10% of the wetland. then the · wetland should be given a du.a! Tllting (Ull). The area ofSpartina would be rated a Category II while the rdafrvcly undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area ofSpartina in dctcm]in.ing the size threshold of 1 aae. · D At least•!. of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer ofshrub, forest, or un-grazcd or un-mowcd grassland. D The wetland has at least 2 of the followiog f~: ·tida1 channds, depressions with open water. or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Cat. I Cat. I Ca1. ll Dual rating VII Wct1and Rating Form -western Washington version 2 18 August 2004 Wetl~ name w number£_ SC 2.0 Natural Herita:e Wetlands (sap. 17) Natural Heritage wetlands have been identiffod by the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 ls the wetland being rated in a Sectionffownsbip/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sit~ before you need to contact WNHPIDNR) S/f/R information from Appendix D 1:8'.l or accessed from WNHP/DNR web sue D YES D -contact WNHP/DNR (sec p. 79) a.nd go to SC 2.2 NOD SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species'i' · DYES -Category l [JNO_oot in a Heritage Wetland SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 87) Does the wetland (or part of the wetland) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs'i' UstJ the key below lo identify if the wetland is a bog. If you answer ya you will still null to raJL ~ tlJdland based on ia fuiu:tions. I. Docs the unit have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile,' (Sec Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils) YesO-gotoQ.3' No[8hotoQ.2 2. Does the wetland have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond'i' • Yes 0-gotoQ. 3 Not81-Is not a bog for purpose ofratin8 3. Does the wetland have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists.of species in Table 3)7 Yes 0-Is a bog for pw-pose of rating No 0-go to Q. 4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the undcrstruy you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the "'bog'' plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog. 4. ls the wetland forested(> 30"/,, cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen. Engleman.n's spruce, or western white pine, WITH any oftbe species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover(> 30% coverage of the total shrublherbaCtJ(JV.S cover)? · YES O = Category 1 NOD ls not a bog for purpose of rating Cati Cat. I Wetland Rating Form~ western Washington version 2 19 August 2004 .Wetlaid iwne or numbel" .f_ SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90) Does the wetland have at least I aae of forest that meets one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? if you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on itsfancttons. D Old-EJ"Owth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre (20 trceS/hcctare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of32 inches (81 cm) or more. NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Tw~ hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR" so old-growth forests do not nccessarily have to have trees of this diameter. D Mature fonsts: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80- 200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) C:Xceeding 21 inches (53cm); aown cover may be less that I 00%,; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is geueally less than that found in old-growth. DYES -Calegol}' 1 tgJ NO not a forested wetland with speciaJ diarac:teristics SC S.O Wctlmds in Coastal Laeoons (seep. 91) . Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon'i' 0 The wcdand lies in a depression adjac.ent to marine watcn that i.s wholly or pan:ially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rncks 0 The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish(> O.S ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be m~red near the bottom) · 0 YES -Go to SC 5.1 NO t8I not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Docs the wetland meet all of the following three conditions'i' 0 The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching. filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20-1' cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 74). D At least '1' oftbe landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un• grazed or un-mowed grassland. D The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre (4350 square feet) YES []-Categof}' I NO 0= Categof}' II Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 20 Cat.I August2004 ~ ""'--- ,......... ~~ t~ .,r: t,; .. c;;: Ir"~ It,,,,,±, f:~;J Wetland name or number.£ SC 6.0 Intenlunal Wetland! (sup. 93) Is the wetland west of the 1889 line(also called the We!tern Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? 0YES=GotoSC6.1 ~O -not an interdunal wetland for rating If you tUUWU ya you will still natl ID rate tJu wetlllnd basd on its futu:tions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: . Long Beach Peninsula -lands west of SRI 03 . Grayland-Westport-lands West of SR I05 . Ocean Sbores.Copalis-lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is one acre or larger? 0 YES = Category II ONO gotoSC6.2 SC 6.2 Is the wetland between O.l and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and l acre,? D YES = Cat-mv m Ca_tegOry Ohvetlatld bw:d oil SpetlatCti8raciiri.,tics_''. · Choose the "hiihu1" rating if We_itimd /#Ji ·;nto Seiiira?"catigorie.r. and record · _onj,."f:' . '•'" , ., '. _.---.0 ·_, >:.:·;_·_\ ·-_' :._, ,._-:-. ,, --: . .IfVou=ans:weted NO for all fVn6,entcr·~ot 0APlllic.able",OO·J); ·I. .. Comments Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 21 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ---, ,,. __ ... ,,, ... Cat.II Cat.III N/A August2004 Wcdsid rame or number H.I: WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN W ASBJNGTON Venim 1-Updall:d Jody 2006 to increase ar:cincy .. d reprodlX'ibility aroon,: users Name of wetland (if known): Wet!and_HI Date of site visit:3/20(2007 & 3/21/2007 Rated by J. Cornwell Trained by Ecology? YeslBJ NoO Date ofTraining: I 1/2006 SECTION: ll TOWNSHIP: 23N RANGE: 5E Is SIT/R in Appendix D1 Ycs_NoX Map of wetland unit: Flgure2, 2A, 281 2C, 20, 2E, 2F Estimated size: DRAFf SUMMARY OF RA TING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland II IDl Category I = Score >=70 Category II = Score 51 ·69 Category Ill -Score 30-50 Category IV = Score < 30 IV __ Score for Water Quality Functions ~8 Score for Hydrofogic_Functions IO Score for Habiw Functions 17 TOT AL Score for functions 45 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland JI__ Does not Apply X Final Category (choose the .. highest" category from above) Check the appropriate type and class of wetland being ntcd. ,. ·1. ' .... -:'.W14o/·~' \:..· / -d.aiiil:' .~...,;;..."i'f Estuarine Deoressiooal Natunl Reritar:e Wedaod Riverine Bo• Lakt-frinn Mature Forest Slo-" Old Growth Forest Flat, Coastal L12oon Frc:sbwatcr Tidal lntcrdunal None of the above Check if unit hu multiple HOM das,es -- Comments Referto Photos 11 & 12; • 7,120 sf is the on-site area Wet1and Rating Form -western Washington version 2 G ~ ,::,_;-~ IXI August2004 Wetland name or number~ :t" Does the wetland being rated meet any of the criteria below! If you answer YES to any of the question, below you will need to protect the wetland according to m·e regulations regarding thc'~ial characteristics found in the wetland. . ':r.· - . SP1. Has the we1land been documenJed as a habiJaJfor any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered tinimal or p{llnt specia (TIE species)? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wetland unil been documented as habiJaJfor any State lined Threatened or Endangered animll/ species? For the purposes of this rating system. • documented• means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are categorized as Category I Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 19 of data form). SP3. Does the wetland contain individuals of Priority specia listed by 1he WDFW for the slate? SP4. Does the welland lime a local significance in oddilion lO iujunclions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Maner Program, the Critical Areas Ordiruuice, or in a local management plan as having special significance. -· To complete the next part of the data sht!et you will need tiJ determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wetland being rated. The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogcomorphic Class ofa wetland can be deterf!lined using the key below. Sec p. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Comments A formal habitat and species request has. riot been submitted; however during the 3/2011007 & 3111/2007 field visits no-priority habitats and spcCies were observed within the wetland. Wetland Rating Fonn -western Washington version 2 2 August2004 unkn unkn unkn unkn ~----..., ~ ,-- ;,..----,-~ Wetl;mdname ornumb,i:r~ ;,.._., .. ,,.,.. r-, --:...-.-~ .... -~ e;;,,..,..,,.."'111 , .... ..: Classification of Wetland Units in Western Washington t..~,J I. Are the water levds in the wetland usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? f8]NO -go to 2 DYES -the wetland class L5 Tidal Frinze .;..;_:_~......i Ifyes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (paru per thousand)? 0 YES -Frabw.atci-Tidal Fringe []NO-Saltwater-Tidal Friaze (E.5niarine) If your wetland can be classified as a Fruhwater Tidal Fnnge use t~ forms for_ Ri'IID"UU wetla11ds. If it is SallMlater Tidal Fringe 1t iS rated as an Estu~ wetland. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editiom of the rating system are called Salt Wau:r Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogcomorphic Classification. f.stuarine wedands were categorized separate!y in the earlier editiom, and !his separation is being kept ·in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the tam "Estuarine" wetland is kept Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Categocy I and II estuarine wetlands have changed (seep. ). 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>W/.) of water to ii. Groundwarer and swi'ace water nmoffare NOT SOUttCS of water to the unit [8JNO -go to 3 []YES -The wetland class is Fbts If your 'Yetland can be classified as a "Flats:' w.etland, use the fonn for Deprasional )"etiands. 3. Does the wetland meet both of the following criteria? 0 The vegetated part of the wetla.nd is on the shares ofa body of open water (witboUI any vegetation on the surface) at least io acres (8 ha) in siz.e; \" ' 0 At least30"!.ofthe open water afU is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)? [EINO -go to 4 DYES-The wetland dw is Lake-frincc (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Docs the wetland meet all of the following aiteria.? 0 The wetland is on a slope (slop, can be vuy gradual), D The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. D The water leaves the wcdand without bein& impounded? NOTE: Surface water dou no/ pond_ in these typ, oj weilands except lJCcastonally in very small and shallow M:pressic»U or behind hu.mmocks( de.prunons are =fly <Jft . diameter and lus than I fool dJ:ep). f8]NO • go to S []YES -The wetland class is Slope Comments Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 3 August2004 ~---~ -;.;.,.." ..l ~ ..----...: Wetland name or num.ba-HI:- S. Does the entire wetland unit med all of the following criteria? [El The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river [:83 The ovcrbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NOTE: The riveri• unil can contmn depTUJioru thal are ji/kdwith water wMn the river is notjk)od,ng. ONO • go to 6 C8] YES -The wetland class is Riverine 6. !s the wedand in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the swface, at some time of the year. This means that any outlet, if present, ,s higher than the inlerior of tk wetland. ONO -go to 7 r8]YES-The wetland class is Dq,rasional 7. Is the wetland located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding. The mi.it docs not pond surface water-more than a fow inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but bas no obvious natural outlet cgJNO -go ·to B O YES -The wetland class is Depmsional 8. Your wetland seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain., or a miall stream within a depressional wetland bas a zone offloading along its sides. GO BACK ANO IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class $at L5 recommended in the second column represents 10-;. or more oftbe total area oftbe wetland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10"/. of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that rep~ts more than 90% of the tor.al area. ·~@i~~-·--, Y'",, :, ' ---~ =-·· .. Slope+ Riverine Riverine Slope+ Depressional Depressional Slope+ Lake-fringe Lake-fringe Dcpressional + Riverine along stream within boundary OepressionaJ Depressional + Lake-fringe Depressional Sall Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you arC unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wc:tJand, or you have more than 2 HGM classes wi~ ~ w~d ~. ~~fy the w~~land as Depressional for the rating. Comments Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 4 August 2004 -:-] Wetland -or numbcr..liJ;,. D D D D D D D D D 1. Does the wdland have the potential to improve water quaUty! D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: Uni1 is• deprusion wilh no surface wats lavinr; ii(® Olldet) poinu • l Wcdmd has .. in~111::e1dy flowin&, OR.highly e.onstrieled. pemwientfy nowina out1e1 poinu • 2 Wcdand has SI~ or dipuly coastrid:c:d, suri'-=e oudet (putna,,Puly jlowint) poinu -I Uni1 is• "flar." deprasion (Q. 7 on l:ey). orin IN! Flan dass, 111111h pennaient $urface OU!fl.ow and,.. efm.s llamnil ~ ,nd/o, ouclet is a mm-made ditch poinlll"' I (If ditch Is not penn,;utmJ/y j/.(N,lng tn.21 wtlt as ~1ntumil1~111Iy f/vwin.g ~) Provide photo· or. drawin, D 1.2 The soil 2 inc.bes beJow the surface (or duff layer) is day or organic (use NRCS <kflnllions) YES . P!)ints .. 4 NO -p(lints-0 D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation (cme~ shrub, and/or forest class): Wetland has persistent, ungrazcd, vegetation> = 95% of area points""' 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation>"" 1/2 of area . points.::: 3 Wetland has penistcnt, ungrazcd vegetation> = 1/10 of area points= I Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation <1/10 ofareil points= 0 ·----_Q{~in~.dasses D 1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. This is the ana of lhe wetland. that rs ponded/or at kmt 1 months, but dries OU1 sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is ~rrnanently ponded Estimate arta as the average condition 5 ow of JO yrs. · Area seasonally ponded·is > ~ total area of wetland Arca seasonally ponded is > V. total area of wetland Area seasonally ponded is < v. total mca of wetland points =4 points= 2 points =O ofl-t)idropenods Total for D 1 Add the painl.s in the boxes above D l. Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? Answer YES if you know or believe there arc pollutants in groundwater or surface watcz- coming into the wetland th.al would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwatcr downgradicnt from the wetland? Note which of the follow mg condiflons provkk the sourcu of polh,rants. A unil may have polluranu commgfrom several soun:u, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. 0 Gruin,: in lhe wetlllld or ,.-jlbin 150 ft D lmtrated ~ disc:hzrees to IW:tland [)ruled fidds Ill' ordwds wilhin ISO ft of wetland 0 A sueam « Qd\'Crt disc:hargcs into wetland !hat drains devdoped uen, residani~ uas, fanned fields, roads, or dc:u-(:U[ loging · · 0 lu:sidmtial, W'ban-, eolfcoimes are 'Mlhin ISO ft of-iland 0 Wcdand is fed by sraundwatef high in phosph<>,m 01 nitr0pn OO<ha_ 1:8] YES multiplier is 2 0 NO multiplier is 1 TOT AL -Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from DI by D2 Add soore to table on p. I ?~i::1~) Figun11_t) 2 I 0 Flgu~J • ·~-~J z 9 (seep.44) multiplier , 18 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington· version 2 s August 2004 I Wedmidnameornlffllba"~ D D D D D D D ).·Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 3.1 Chanctmstics of surface water 80Ws out-of the wetland unit Unit is a depression with QO IWf.::e wa1a" leaving it (no outlet) points• 4 Unit has an iot:ennittcndy flowin1, OR highly constricted pcrmaneotly flowing outlet points-= 2 Unit is flu depression (Q. 7 on key), or in the Aats class, with permanent surface outflow aad ao obrioat aataral oadd and/or it I man·rMde ditch · points• I (1/dirdi is not pennanentlyjlowing treat unil as "intumittmtly flowing~) !,[nit has an uneonstrii:ttd, ~~iglttly constricted, ~ o_lltl_C! D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods flowin ,int,s~Q &ti mate the height of ponding al,c,u tM. bottom of the outlet. For units with no ouJ/et measure from lhe surfaa of ~rmanUIJ water or <keput pan (if dry). Maro of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points "" 7 The wetland is a "head.wale(' wetland'' points• 5 Marks of ponding bcnrc:cn 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of ow:le.t points = 5 Marla arc at least 0.5 ft to< 2 ft from swuce or bouom of outlet points= 3 Wetland iJ flat(yes to Q 2 or Q. 7 on key) but has small depressions on the swface that ttap water point! -I Muks of ponding less than 0.5 ft points-0 D 3.3 Contribution of wetland to storage in the watershed Estimme the ratio of the area of upstream basin coruributing surface waler to lhe wetland lo the area of the wetland unil iut!lf. The area oftbe basin is less than 10 times the area of unit The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit Entire unit is in the FLA TS class points= 5 points=3 points=O ints= s Total for D 3 Add the poinls in t~ bous above D 4. Docs the wetland have the opportunity.to nduce flooding and erosion! Answer YES if the wetland is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction in water vdocity it provides., helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO iftbe water coming into the wc:tland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate, tide gate, flap valve, resccvoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 909!. oftbc water in the wetland is from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occw-. Nole which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. 0 Wetland is in a hcadwatcrofa river or stream that has flooding problems [81 Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems 0 Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems 00thu __ [8JYES multiplier is 2 []No muJtiplier is 1 TOTAL-Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add score to table on p. 1 Comments :rJJ.,6)' Fl;uNJ Flgin; 0 -' 5 (s«p../9) multipli~ , 10 Wetland Raring Form -western Washiogton vcnion 2 6 August 2004 Ill"' ............. r._-. ,... .. ---, r~-r-.....- ..,~,.,--,-.-, Wetland name or number _HJ; ~ ............. " ~ Q,;~.---.-:..; --~·~·--.. H 1. ~ the wella'!_~ have the potential to proYide habitat for many ;pccies? HI.I Vegetation5tructure(uep. 71) Checi: the typu of W!~tation class~ present (as defined by Cowardin)· Siu thruholdfor each class Is V. acre or more than 10% ofrk area if unit is .smalkr than 2.5 acres. D Aquatic bed · ~ Emergent plants r8J Scrub/shrub (areas where shrubs have >30"/o cover) 0 Forested(~ where trees have >30"!.cover) Jf the unit has a forested class check if D Forested areas have 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sulK:anopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that cacb cover 20"!. within the forested polygon Add the rrumber of ..,egetation typu that qllQtify. If you hClJe: 4 types or more 3 iype, 2 iype, Map of.Cowardin veg:8t8tior(dasses points= 4 points= 2 points .. 1 I . Its -0 H 1.2 Hydroperiocb:(su p. 73) <:Mei the typu ofwatu ngtmu {hycuoperiods} present within the wetland. The ware,: ngime has to CO'VU more than /0% of tM wetland or V. acre to cormt. (See tutforducription of lrydropenodJ:.) D Pcnnanendy flooded or inundated 0 S<uonally fiood<d "'inuod'1ed D Occasionally flooded or inundated 181 Satwatcd only 4 or more types present 3 types present 2,ype,- point!= 3 points= 2 point,-I D Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland 181 Seasonally flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland D Lau-J~ wetkDu1 = 2 poinu -Fru~tuWwa/Jzndc:2poiDtll H 1.3 Ric;hness of Plant Species (seep. 75) Count the numbel'ofplant species in the wetland that cover at least IO ft2. (Different patches of the same ¥CW con be combiMd to meet the siu thnmotd.)' You do not have to name the species. Do not inclutH £was ion Mi/foil, real canarygras.r, plU'p/e loosutrife, Conatban Thtsde. If you counted: > 19 species points= 2 S • 19 species points= 1 List spec1u below if you want to: <5 species points -O e'.,-.. ,~ Ftg-url'1J) 2 Total for pa~ Wetland Rating Form -western Washiogron vcn:ion 2 l3 August2004 ~~~~ ~ ,--~ -..---, ~--.. ~ ...._-.~-·.,-.-./ ..~·---_-.... ..:;~~,..···'.A ~--~~--,..;, " -· ~ .. ; Wc:dand n= or 11vmber 1-\J:" H 1.4 Jntgspeqjon of habitats (sup. 76) Decide from the diagrams below whether intcrspcrs.ioo between Cowardin vegetation classes ( desaibed in H 1.1 ), or classes and uovegctated areas ( can include open water or mud Hats) is high, medium, low, or none. ~~ ... ·.·.~~ ~~~~ None = 0 points Low= 1 point Moderate = 2 points / [riparian braided channels] NOTE: If you have four or more classes or three vegetation c_lasses and open water the rating is always "high". UH niai, ciCONafdiii·veg&tat1on.dasse5 H 1.5 Special Habitat f~: (~e p. 77) . Check the Jwbitat feanires that are prumt in tM wetland. The number of checks is the number of points you pllt into the nu.I column. D Large. downed, woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). D Standing snags (diameter at bottom >4 inches} in the wetland D Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft. {2m.) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (Im) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 fl: (!Om) 0 Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or m:uskrat for denning (>30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (c'Ul shrubs or trees thot Mt. not yt.t turned gre}t'lm:,wn) D Al least Y. acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are pennan~tly or seasonally inundated (strucnires for egg-laying by amphibians) ~ Invasive plants cover Jess than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants Note: The 20% statt.d in early printinf{s of the marrual on pa,:_e i8 is an error Comments: H ]. TOT AL Score -potential for providing habitat Add the scores from HI./, Hl.2, Hl.3_! H/.4, Hl.5 . --~~ Agt.1,.1.SI 2 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington vmion2 14 August 2004 Welland rwne or amnber HJ:. H 2. Docs the wetland Uve the opportunity to provide habitat for many sptties!J H 2.1 Buffers (ue p. 80) Flgur.t Choose the t:kscnpJfon thaJ be.st rq,resenis condition of buff.er of wetlcuid. The highest scormg criterion that applies to the wetland is to~ u.sul m the rating. See tut/or de.fuuJion of "undisturbed. " D 100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >9S% of circumference. No saucrures are within the undisturbed part ofbuffa. (n::latively undisturbed°also means no grazing, no landscaping, no daily human use) Points D 100 m (330 ft) of relatively undisnubed vegetated an:a.s. rocky areas, or open water >S~!. circumference. Points 0 50 m (170ft) ofrelativdy undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water 3 >95% circwnfa-cnce. Poinu D 100 m (330ft) ofrelativdy undisturbed vcgcwcd. areas, rocky areas, or open water >25o/. circumference. Points . llsJ 50 m (170ft) of rclativdy undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for> 50-!. circumference. Points If bufftr does not med any of the three criteria above D No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland > 95% circumfcrcnce. Llghl to modeme grazing, or lawns are OK. Points D No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing or lawns are OK Points 0 Heavy grazing in buffer. Points· D Vegetated buffers arc <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled fidds, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland) Points D Bufftr docs DOI: meet any of the criteria above. Points· Mriai choto ahowino:buffers H 2.2 Corridors' and Connections (sap. 11) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken Yegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30-J. cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that coonc:cts to cstuaries,'other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 aacs in size? (dams in riparian corridors, Mavily used gravel roads, pavul roads, are consit:kred breaks ,n the co"idor). DYES -4 points (go to H 2.J) ~o • go 10 H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 ls the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland} that is at least 50ft wide, has atJeast 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 3 acres in size? OR a Lake--frince wed and, if it does not: have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? [81YES = 2 points (go to H 2.3) []NO• H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi (8km) of a bradosh or salt water estual}' OR within 3 mi ofa large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? r8]YES .,. I nnint []NO"' 0 points Total for page_§__, Wetland Rating Form -western Washingron version 2 ll August2004 WIiiand 11m1e « Qumba" 1-ll: H 2.3 Ner qr l4jacgrt tD qthq priority habitats listed by WDFW (w p. 12) Which of the following priority habitats m-e within 330ft (I OOm) of the wetland? (NOTE: W connecLiam dD not NJve ,o be relatively undisturbed. 1hue arc DFW tkjillitlonJ. Ched: with )OW" local DFW blologisl iftltetT ors tu1y qr,utio,u ~ Riparian: The area adjaeent to aqucic systems with {lowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terre5trial ecosystems which m~ly infiuenc:c.each other. 0 Aspea Stasub: PUfC « mixed stsnds of aspen greater than 0.1 ha (2 acres). D am,: Orea1et dWl 7.6 m (2S ft) high and occurrinabelowSOOO ft. D Old-srowth ron:su: (Old-growth west of Cuc.de crest) Stands of at \cat 2 lfce species, fomlina a multi·layered canopy with occasional small opening,; with at least 20 tt-'ha (8 ttees/acre) > 81 cm (32 in) dbh or> 200 years of age. 0 Mabatt lorcsts: Stands with a~ diameters exceeding S3 cm (21 in) dbh; crovm cover may be less that I 00%; decay, decadaice, nwnben of snags, anci qwintity of large downed material is sener-lly less than that found in old-gov.th; 80 • 200 years old west of the Cascade crest. 0 Prairies: Relatively undisturbed arus (as indicated by dominance of nat.i~ plants) where grasses and/or (orbs form the~ climax pl.ant community. 0 Talu1: HomogcnoU$ areas of rock rubble nutging in average mt 0.IS • 2.0 m(O.S ·6.~ ft). composed of basalt, andesitc. and/or scdimcnwy rock, including ripnp slides and mine tailings. May be as,ociated with cliffs. 0 Cave,: A nlltllllllly occurring cavity, ro:,css, void, « system of intcreonncetcd passages 0 Orqo,11 wbite Oak:: Woodlands Smnds of puni oak or oaldeonifcr associations where canopy coverage of the oak eompolJC!lt of the stand is 2S%. D Urba11 Nabaral Opera Space: A Pfl9rity species f'Wdes within or is adjacent to the opcn spaoe and uses ii for breeding and/Of rqular feeding; and/« the open space functioos as I corridor connecting other priority habitms. especially thox th.at ~uld nthctwise be i,olated; and/« the open space is In isolated remnant of natural habitat largcf th.an 4 hi (10 ICfCS) and i, SUITOUndcd by urtian development. 0 E,t111ry/E,tu11')"--like: Oeepw:m:er tidal habitau and adjacent tidal wdland1, ull.lally -=mi-enclosed by land but with open, partly obstructed or sporadic KCc:sS to the open ocean, and in Y<lhich ocean water i, at least occasionally diluted by freshwater runoff from the land.~ salinity may be periodically increased above that of the open ocean by evaporation. Along IOmc low--cncrgy coastlines there is appreciable dilution of ,ca w=:r. Estuarine habitat e,r;tends upstream and landward to '1.ilere occan..ctc:rived salts measure less than O.Sppt. during the period of uuaae annual D low flow. Includes both cswaries and lagoons M.l'Ul6'E.Jt11arine Shottllnes: Shott.lines include the intertidal and subtidal zonc1 ofbcac:hes. and may al,o include the backshorc and adjaccrt components of the laTC:Strial landscape (e.g., cliff1, snags, mature trees. dunes, meadows) that are imponant to shoreline associated fish and wildlife and that coritributc to shoreline function (e.g., sand/rock/log rccn:itment, nutrien1 contribution, erosion control). Ifwetland has J llr mo~ priority habital:!I .. 4 poUlu If wetland has l priority habital:!I .. l poiats If wetland has 1 priority habitat .. I point No habitats• 0 poinlS Nok: All ve~la~d wetlands arc by definition a priority hob/rat but arc not included in 1hi1 lltt. Ntarby wttlands an ~din qwslion H 2.4, Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 16 August2004 ~ --. .,.,,.; r::: Wetland name or number HJ:. ~ ,....... ..,._,~,-.-::, t,:_;_'.,l i;...., .• -, .. ·..: --- H 2.4 Wetland I and,caz (choose the onL ducnption of the landscape around the wetland that hut fits) (sup. 14) There arc 81 least 3 other wetlands within \4 mile, and the connections between them arc rdatively undisturbed (light grazing between wctlamb OK, 8S is lake shore with some boating, but connections shou1d NOT -be bisected by paved roads. fiU, fields, or other development points"' The wetland is Lake.fringe ou a lake with little disturbance and then: uc 3 other lake- fringe wetlands within Y, mile points= There arc at least 3 other wetlands within \4 mile, BUT the connections between them arc disrurl><d points= The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and then: are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands Within Vi: mile poinu- There is at least I wetland within Yi mile. points., There are no wetlands within Y, mile. ooints = H 1. TOT AL Scor-e -opportunity for providing habiw Add the scores ,n the colwnn above TOT AL for H I frcm page 14 Tat.al Scou for Habitat Fuoctious -add the points for H I, H 2 and rccord_thc result on p. l Comments .-- J IO 7 17 Wetland Rating Form -western WashingtoD ven:ion 2 17 August 2004 ,........., --, •h·---.-.0 r:::: ... _:J ---·--.. ,"' .. _,..., L••"•• ,,ii :.;._.;.....·,......4 ~ ........... .;.: Wedind n~ or number-4-\J: CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Pkast! ddumi.nt! if tht! wetland met!IS tht! attributu describt!d below and circle tht! appropriate· aitswers and Category. ~ ..•.•. .1 "'.~&D~ Type_,·, . .,~ :· Cat~ry chi~i/ojf d,:;;; criUiJO tllflt.aiiiftf t~ ·,k.~etia,jd. :Si~ct -.;h/~~,;ke'.(;ai;gO,y (from dro-...,,,;...;,;:m·eifu ;~ C~ftt~,;.·c6JU11'111J'Whiir tlte ammiDnate cniina li."r/wr: • . . . . SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands (ue p. 36) Docs the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? D The dominant water regime is tidal, D V egctated, and D With a salinity greater than 0.S ppt. DYES = Go to SC I.I C8JNO Cat. I SC 1.1 Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park,. National Estwuy Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Parle or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-lSl? nYES -Cale""'"" I rlNO go to SC 1.2 SC I.2 Is the wedand at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following three coaditions? YES = Catego,y I NO"" Caregory fl Cat. I 0 The wetland is rdatively undisturbed (hu no diking, ditdiing, filling, cultivation, Cat ll grazing, and has less than 10"/o cover ofnon-native plant species. If the non•narive Spartina spp. are the only spetics that cover more than 10% oflhe wetland, thc:n the Dual wetlind should be given a du.al rating (1/U). "The area of Spartina would be nitcd a' rating Category II while the relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species wouJd be a Category L Do not, however, exclude the area ofSpartina in determining the YII siz.e threshold of 1 aae. D At least% of the landward edge of the wedand has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un·grazed or un-mowed grassland. 0 The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. ,c --C Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 18 August 2004 Wetlandnameornumber --'J: SC 2.0 Natural Hcrita&e Wetlands (s~p. 67) Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natura) Heritage Program.lDNR as either high quality undistumed wetlands or wetlands that suppon state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 ls the wetland being ruQ1 lO a Soction/Township/R.ange that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? (1his question is used to screm out most siu.s befort. you need to contact WNHPIDNR) S/T/R information from Appendix D [8J or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site D YES 0-contact WNHP/DNR (sec p. 79) and go to SC 2.2 N0[8) SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisrurbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant spccics7 DYES ... Categcny I [)NO_not lO a Heritage Wetland SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 87) Docs the wetland (or part of the wetland) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs7 Use the key below to identify if 1he wetland is a bog. If you 4JtSWU yes you wiil still need ID rau the wtbuul based on iJs fandiam. 1. Docs the unit have organic soil boriums (i.e. layers oforgan.ic soil), either peats or mucks. that compose 16 inches ex more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (Sec Appendix B for a fidd key to identify organic soils) YcsO-eotoQ.3 No[8lgotoQ.2 2. Docs the wetland have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less lb.an 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond? Yes O · go 10 Q. 3 No~· ls not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Docs lhe wetland have more than 70"'/ocover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if present, consist of the "'bog" species lisrcd in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the tolal shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species lO Table 3)7 Yes 0-Is a bog for pmpose of rating No 0-go 10 Q. 4 NOTE: lfyou arc uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understocy you may substirutc that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a bole dug at least 16" deep. lfthe pH is less th.an 5.0 and lhc "bog'' plan1 species in Table 3 arc present, the wetland is a bog. 4. ls the wetland forested (> 30% cover) with sitka spruce., subalpine fir, wcstcm red ccdm', western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Eoglcmann's spruce, or western white pine, WITH aoy of the species (or combination of species) on lhc bog species plant lis1 in Table 3 as a significant component oflhc ground cover(> 30% cover~ge ofrhe total shrub/herbaceous cowr)? YES D = Category I ~OD ls not a bog for pwpose of rating Cat. I Cat. I Wetland Ra.ting Form -western Washington version 2 19 August 2004 Wetlmd iwne or number ~ ']; SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90) Does the wetland have at least 1 aac of forest that meets one of these criteria for the Department offish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? //you answer yes you will still need to rate W welland based on itsfanctions. D Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two ttcc species,. forming a multi-layC'led canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 nccs/acn (20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diamcter at ln-east height (dbb) of32 inches (81 an) or more. NOTE; The criterion for dbb is based on measurements for upland forests. Two- hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because !heir . growth rB1eS are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR" so old-growth forests do not n«essarily have to have trees ofthis diameter. D Mature fo.-ests: (west of the Casc.adc Crest) Stands where the largest trees ve 80- 200 years old OR have average diameters (dbb) exceeding 21 inches (53an); aown cover may be less that 100-J.; decay, dec:adcncc, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less lhan that found in old·growtb. [JYEs • Categocy I '[81 NO not a forested wetland with special characteristics SC S.0 Wetlands In Coastal Laeooos (seep. 91) Does the wcdand meei all oftbe following aiteria ofa wetland lO a c:oastal lagoon? 0 The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or pan:ially scpamed from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocb D The lagoon in which lhc wetland is located contains swfac.e water that is saline or brac.kish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a ponion of lhe lagoon (needs to be measured near the botlom) • DYES -Go to SC 5.1 NO 181 not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Docs the wetland meet all of the following mm: conditions? 0 The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching. filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant species (sec list of invasive species on p. 74). D At lea.st% of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un- graz.cd or un-mOwed grassland. D The wetland is larger than 1/10 acrc(4350 square feei) YES O· Category I NO 0-c.t,go,y II Wetland Rating Form-westc:m Washington version 2 20 Cat. I August2004 [" .... : r-e--- :.,-r--: ~-~ t-~---J c:il Cc .. :. Wdland ,wnt; or numba-~::L SC 6.0 lnterdunal Wetlands (ue p. 93) Is the wetland west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? 0 YES =Go to SC 6.1 C8]NO -not an interdunal wetland for rating If you, IUU'tfla' ya you will. still. Med ID rrlll. tJu WdlaJIII baud on lu fundibns.. In practical terms that meam the foUowing geographic areas: . Llllg Beach Pemnsula-land.s west of SRI OJ . Grayland-Wcstport-lands west of SR 105 . Ocean Sbores-Copalis-lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one aac or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is one acre or larger? D YES ... Catcgol')' n 0 NO go to SC 6.2 SC 6.2 Is the wetland between 0.1 and l acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and I aae,? DYES,. CMl'O'nnl III Category o[~~~ tiuc4~~a:.~~!l~~ri'cteristia ~ -. · · ChOOSe,the '.'.Jujh'est.":rai_t,',;g·if W'eil~/a}Jj intQ ieveraJ ca!e:iones, and record oncj,.'·:J. _ · · __ ._ -~:_:'. '. _." . ·, • · ·: ,' · ~ . lfvo1i'miswcicd:NO'.fOI' .arl:~ enfer,';'NotAnnlicabfe'.:',ori id. , . Comments Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 21 "-·--·c-~.;. ,........ ..,...,.:,. ~ .. ~ ,--, -------- Catll Cat.ill NIA August 2004 Wdlandname ornumberL WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2-Updced Juty 2006 to inae1sc IICCUl'IICY and rq,roclucibili1y &ma:111 uscn Name of wetland (if known): Wetland J Date of site visit:3/20/2007 & 3/21/2007 Rated by J. Cornwell Trained by Ecology? Yes~ NoO Date of Training: 11/2006 SECTION: 33 TOWNSHIP: 23N RANGE: SE Is Sff/R in Appendix 07 Y~_NoX Map of wetland unit Flgure2, 2A, 281 2c1 201 2E, 2F Estimated size: DRAFT SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCflONS provided by wedand D ID ...K_ Category I "" Score >=70 Category II= Score 51-69 Category m-= Score 30-50 Ca~gory IV = Score < 30 IV__ . Score for Water Quality Functions ~4 S~re.~or H.y~rologic Functions 16 Score for Habitat Functions IS TOTAL Score for functions 45 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland . I II__ Does-not Apply~ Final C8tegory (c:hoose the "highest" category rrom above) Cbttk the appropriate type and class. of wetland being nted. ~ . '.,~ ,• . Estuarine Denressional Natural Herita2e Wetland Riverine Bo• Lake--friDl!'e Mature Forest Slo..,. Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal l.a!loon Freshwater Tidal lnterdunal None of the above Cheek if unit has multiple HGMclus:cs--1 · Comments Refer to Photo 13; • 9,699 sf is the tota1 area. Wetland Turing Form -western Washington version 2 0 -,~~..:~: I I August 2004 Wed and name or numba-2 Does the wetland being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer YFS to·any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland ~r._ding 1_0·tbe .rcgulati1;ms regarding the special ~tcristics found in the wetland. SPI. Has the wetland been dacumarled cu a habilalforany FethraIJy listed TnnaLenl!d or Endangered animal or plant iptt:iu (l'IE speciei)? For the pwposes of this rating system. "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wetland unit been documented as habil.a!for any Slale listed I'hnauni!d Or Endangered animal ;peciu'! For the purposes of this rating sys~m. "documen~d" means the wetland is on the approprinte state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are categorized as Category-1 Natural Heritage Wetlands (sec p. 19 of data fonn). SP4. ~i the wedand have o local signifiamce in addition to ilsfiu,£tions1.For example. the wetland bas been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having sf!CCial significance. To complete the next part ofthe data sheet you will nel!d to determine the Hvcfrogeqmorphic Class of the w_etland being rated The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how wcJI the wetland functions: The Hydrogcomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Comments · A fonnal habitat and species request has not been submitted; however during the 3/20/2007 & 3/21/2007 field visits no priority habitats and species were observed within the wetland. Wetland Rating Form -western Washington venion 2 2 August 2004 unkn unkn unkn unkn ..--"'·'"~"·'·" ,,...-,. ......... 1.--..:-·-.-~a ,.;,.:_.~;,; c: .. --• ~ k,'-v-< Wetbndnameornwnber2_ Classification of Wetland Unit:5 in Western Washington I. Are the water lcveb in the wetland usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? 18!NO-go to 2 OYE.s-the wetland class is Tidal Frin&e If yes, is the salinity of the wata dming periods of annual low fl~ bd0w O.S ppt {parts per thousand)? D YES-Freshwater Tidal Fringe ONO -Saltwater Tidal Frincc (Estu~~nc) If your wetland can ~ classified as a F rulrwater Tidal Fringe use tN forms for Ri'Perine wcdands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as on EsuulnM wetland. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and secood editions of the ming system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the HydrogcomOiphic Oassifi.cation. Estuarine: wetlands were categorized separatdy in the earlier editions,. and this separation U being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category land D estumiue wetlands baVl: changed (see p. ). z. The entire wetland unit is Hat and precipitation is the only source (>9()-1.) of water to il Groundwater and surface water nm.off are NOT sources of water to the unit. 181NO -go to 3 []YES -The wetland class is Flats If your wctl.4nd can be classified u a "FJats" wcti!ij.d, use the form for Deprasioaal wcdJnds. 3. Docs the wet1and med both of the following criteria? D The vegetated~ of the wetland lJ on the shores of a body of open ·water (without any vegeta.tio~ on the surface) 8l Jeasi 20 acres (8 ha) in size; D At least 30-~ofthc open water area is deeper than 6.6 f\(2 m)? C81NO-go to 4 DYES-The wetland class is Lake-rria1e (Lac.ustrioe Frin&e) 4. Docs the wetland meet all of the followi..ug criteria? D The wetland is on a slope (slope can~ very grodua[), 0 The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subswuce, as sheetfl.ow, or in a swale without distinct banks. D The water leave, the wetland without beiuc impounded? NOTE: Surface wa(er does not pond in these ty~ of wetlands ucept occasionally In very small and s~ow tkprusions or buitnd hummocks( tkpress,ons are usually <3/t diameter and less than I foot dup). (8JNO ·• go to S []YES-The wetland class is Slope Comments Wetland Rating Fonn -western Washington version 2 3 August 2004 ~ -~, ................. -:.....--· -~ .......... •-~···~ ~ ·=·..-•.! Wedmd name or number I_ ii>,:,..,...:~ 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet aD of the following criteria? ;,,,: ••.• ..i 0 The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by ovcrbank flooding from that stream or river D The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NafE: ~ nveri,,e llllil can contain depnssians thaJ an jilkdw1tlr water wMn dre rii,er is not flooding. (E:INO • go to 6 0 YES -The wetland class is Rinrine 6. Is the wetland in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some lime of the year. This mt:an5 that any OUllet, if present, 15 higher 1han 1he interior of /he we/land. [JNO -go to 7 18]YES -The wetland class is ~prasional 7. Is the wetland located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding. The unit docs not pond surface water more than a few' inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwati::r in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet (8)NO -go to 8 0 YES -The wetland class is ~pmsional 8. Your wetland seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several differcol HOM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a z.one of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS }. 7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT {make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10"/e of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the totaluea. .• ,i&i/ii<..~-·: at<'...;~ .. -"'i. Slope+ Riverine Riverine Slope+ Dcpressional Depressional Slope+ Lake-fringe Lake-fringe Dcpressional + Riverine along stream within boundary Deprcssional Depressional + Lake-fringe Depressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to determine which of the above aiteria apply to your wetland, or you have more than 2 HOM classes within a wetland bouri.dary, classify the wetland as Deprasiooal for the rating. Commeot5 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington v~ion 2 4 August 2004 r----:i Wetland name wriumber~ D D D D D D D D I . I Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: Unit i$ a depressiaa wilh no 5Wfac.e wuct le&YUII it (no oudd) pomu • 3 Wedand ham inttnnitt=l1ty flowiri&, OR highly ccnmiaed. ~dy ftOMII& oude1 points ... 2 Wed,nd bas m u:icorwriaed, or sli"3tly comtriaed, surface outlet (permanmtlyjlu,,,ir,g) points a. J Uni! i$ a "flat" depression (Q. 7 aa key)."°' ill the f1m dau, wilh pennmm1. smfaa: oulflow and no otlriaG umral -Ike arulfor oudet is a man-made ditch points "" I (if duds 11no,par,,anendyjbwm,llWll llllitiu "inlumiuf:tll}y.fu,t,,in,·J Provide -photo or d D l.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface (or-duff lay-er) i.s clay or Ol"g:amc (we NRCS deflnitiorlS) YES points "'" 4 · NO points-0 D I.3 Characteristic$ of persistent vegetation (emergent,. shrub, and/or forest class): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegewion >.;, 95% of area points= 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vcgcwion > ~ 1/2 of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungraz.ed vegetation> .. 1/10 of area points= l Wetland has persistent. ungrazed vegetation <1/10 of area . points= 0 -• ·:c.,f.~~-ln.w,getation dassei 01 .4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. This 1s the area of the wetland that is ponded for at kast 2 months, buJ driu out some.time. during the year. Do not count the. arr:a that ,s permanently ponded Estimate. area as the awrage. condition 5 end of 10 yrs. Area seasonally ponded is >'!l.z tota1 area of wetland Area seasonally ponded is > V. total area of wetland Area seasonally ponded is < V. total area of wetland of. points= 4 points= 2 points= 0 • V ••.: - Total for-DI Add lhe poinu in the boxes above D 2. Does the wetland have tht' opportunity to improve water-quality! Answer YES if you know or ~ieve there arc pollutants in groundwater or~ ~er coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradiem from the wc:d.and7 Nore which of the followtng condinons provide the. sources of pollutants. A unit may have poJ/u1mus coming/ram several sourcu, bw any single source would qualify as opportunity. 0 lhzina in the wedand or wilhin I SO ft 0 lJntrmed a«mwlla' disch&rp:s ID waiaad [)Tilled tidds or ordwds wilhin I SO I\ of vmiand 0 A strmm or culven disdwJa into wdbnd thai drains developed a:us.. residential areas. famxd fidds, roadl, or dear-cut loging 181 Risidtmial, iabm area, golf-are wilhin 150 ft or wedmd D Wetlmd is fed by pound.water high in pbosphonn or nitrogm 00d« - -YES multiplier is 2 D NO multiplier is I TOTAL-Water-Quality"Functions Multiply the score from DI by 02 Add score to tab!~ on p. 1 2 0 FlguN_i.C. 3 Agl.u9!- 2 7 (:seep.44) multiplier i 14 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 5 August 2004 Wetland name or number_;[_ D D D D D D D 3. Does the wetland have the potential to fflluce flooding and erosion? D 3. I Characteristics of swface water flows out of the wetland unit UM is• depression with no surlace wata" leaving it (no outlet) points .. 4 Uni! has an intamittud.ly flowing, OR highly oonsaicud permaneritly flowirig outlet points• 2 Unit it flit depression (Q. 7 OP key), or in !he Flm elus, with pennarient surface oudlow aa.d no obviou aataral oadd and/or i.s a man•made ditc:h pointJ • I (If ditch is not pertn01tU1tly flowing treat unit cu "intenniltently flowing NJ Unil has an uneomuicted, or slightly amstricted, surface outlet D 3.2 Depth of storage dwing wet periods flowi ·nu .. o Estimate the. height of ponding above the. bottom of the out/el. For units will, no OuJlet measure.from die surface of pe.rmaMnl water or deepest part (if dry). Marks of ponding arc 3 ft or mare above the surface or bottom ofoutl.et points• 7 The wetland i.s a "headwater" wetland" points -S Marks of ponding between 2 ft to< 3 ft from suriace or botrom of outlet points -5 Marts are at least 0.5 ft to< 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points • 3 Wetland is flat{ycs to Q 2 or Q. 7 on key) but has small depressions on the swface that trap Water. points • 1 Marks of ponding ~eµ than 0.5 ft point!• O D 3.3 Contribution of wetland to storage in the watershed Eszimate the raJio of the area of upszream basin contribwing surface waler to the wetland to IM area of the wetland unil iuelf. The area of the basin is less than IO times the area of unit The area. of the basin is IO to 100 times the area of the unit The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit Entire unit is in the FLA TS cl.ass points= S points .. 3 points •O ,ints • 5 Total for-DJ Add the points in the bous abtNt D 4. Docs tbe wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion! Answer YES iflhc wetland is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction in water velocity it provides, helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/« erosive flows. Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland LS controlled by a structure such as flood gate, tide gate, flap valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than ~A of the water in the wc:d.and is from groundwater in areas where dam.aging groundwater flooding does not occur. Note which of the following indicators of opportunity opply. 0 Wetland is in a headwater ofa river or stream that has flooding problems 0 Wetland drains to a river or stream that bas flooding problems 0 Wetland bas no outlet and impounds surface I\Uloff water that might otherwise flow into a ri11er or stream that bas flooding problems 00tho, -- [giYES multiplier is 2 []No multiplier is I Comments TOT AL • Hydrologic Fuuctiom Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add score lo table on p. 1 '(~~.~~. Flgu:ii.ti:: 2 FJo-3 3 FiguN",I ' 8 (sup.49) multiplier • •• Welland Rating Fonn -western Washington version 2 • August 2004 ~ -··-,·-· ,.......... ~ ., ______ .,, ..... ______ ,,-c7 Wo:Wrid narr. ornumberL a;;·.:-~-:,:· ..... -:'.:.-··---,-., e---, C .; i,.~~~J! L.A H 1. Does the wetland have tbe potmtbl to provide habitat ror many specici? H I.I Vegetation structure (seep. 71) Checlc tJu: tyJM3 of w:getation clauu present (as ~finul by Cowan:/i,i)-Siu lhnsholdfor each class ts Y., acre or more than 10% of the ana if unit is smalkr than 1.5 acres. D Aquatic bed t8l Emergent plants ~ Saub/shrub (areas where shrubs have >300!. cover) t8J Forested {areas where trees have >30% cover) If tlu writ has ofo~uted class check if D Forested auas have 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/grourukover) that each cover 20-!. within the £ousted polygon · Add the mimber of vegetalion types that qualify. If you have: 4 types or mo~ 3 type, 2 type, Map of Cowardin vegetation dasses points= 4 point5 = 2 points= I I . Its"" 0 H 1.2 Hydropcriods (sup. 73) Check the types of water regimes (lrydropuiods) pruenl within tM wetland. TM water regime has to cover more than /0% of the wedand or Y. ac.n to counJ. (See tutforducriptionof hydropenods.) C8J Permanently flooded or inundated D Seasonally flooded or inundated t8J Ocouionally flooded or inundated 0 Satunted only 4 or more types present 3 types present 2 types presc:iJI points= 3 points= 2 points"' I D Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland [81 Seasonally flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland 0 lau-frinp"""""4•, points . -Frallwata tidal wn/J:Nl • 1 points H 1.3 Richnc,s of Plant Species (sup. 71) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least IO tt1. (Diffr.rent patche5 of the same spuiu can be combined to meet the siu threshold.) You do nol have to name tM species. Do not include Eurcwon Mi/foil, reed canarygrass, piirple loruutrife, Canadian Thistle. lfyou counted: > 19 species points= 2 5 • 19 species points "' I List species be/uw If you want to: <5 species points ~ O ····-··-~ .,.._ 2 F6gw.l 2 Total forpage_i, Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 13 August 2004 , ... ~~-";j ~ ~ to,., •••• ~ -...... .,, ..... ., Wetland name l'!f number i ~ ..... , ....... l H l.4 lntermroion of habitats (sap. 76) ~ --~--·-' t.. ...... Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowaidin vegetation classes (described in H 1.1), or classes and unv~etated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, mediwn, low, or none. · ~~~~ ~~~~ None = 0 points Low= 1 point . " • • • -~ ... -._~, ~ ''""'• . '~ High = 3 points Moderate = 2 points / [ riparian braided channels J NOTE: If you have four or more clas~ or three veg~tation classes and open water the rating is always '·high". Use·map C¥¢~ ,ieg~:dasses H 1.5 Special Habitat fcatum· (seep. 77) Checlc the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checlcs ts the number of points you put into the next column. D Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). D Standing snags (diameter at bottom >4 inches) in the wetland 0 Undercut bank., are present for at least 6.6 ft. (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (Im) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 ft (!Om) D Stable steep banks or fine material thal might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (CUI shrubs or trees that have not yet turned grey/brown) . D At least Y. aae of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasooally inundated (structures for egg-laying by amphibians) [8J lnvasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants Note: The 20% staled in early printin!{s of the inanuol on page.78 is an error Comments: HI. TOTAL Score-potential for providing habitat Addthescoresfrom!JJ.~I__.__H/.2, Hl.3, Hl.4, Hl.5 =~ AatrelC. 2 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 14 August 2004 WedM'l.d name, or number_.:r_ H 2. Docs the wetlaod have the op-portuoity to provide bab!tat for many species!) H 2.1 Imffm {stt p. 10) Fig~ Choose the ~cription 1hat but np~nts conditi'on of buffer of wetland. The highest scoring criurion that applies to 1M. wetland U to be used in tM. roting. Su tulfor defmJtion of "undisturbed. " 0 100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegewed areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the wdisrurbed pan of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no grazing. no landscaping, no daily human use) D 100 m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegewed are.as, rocky areas, or open water Points >50-/e circumference. Points D 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water 2 >95% circumference. Point5' 0 100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas. or open water >25,... circumference. Points, 0 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for> 50"/,, circumference. Points' If buffer d~ not meet any or the three criteria above 0 No paved arcas(except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) ofwedand > 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing. or lawns are OK. Points' [8] No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >SO-!. circumference. Light to modcnuc grlling or lawns arc OK Points, 0 Heavy grazing in buffer. Point5' D Vegetated buffas are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled fields. paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland) Poiot5, D Buffer docs not meet any oftbeaiteria above. Points, Aeriaf ..;.,_..;.,st\owinn 'buffeis H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (sup. 11) H 2.2.1 Is ~ we:dand pan of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken "'.Cgctated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is a1 least 150 ft wide, has al least 30"/e cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to. estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that arc at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, pavui roads, arc considered breaks ,n the corridor). []YES = 4 points (go to H 1.3) IBJNO • go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, hu at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to csruarics, other wcclands or undisturbed uplands that arc at least 25 I aaes in size? OR a Lakc-frini,c wetland, ifit does not have an undisturbed conidor as in the question above? DYES "' 2 points (go to H 2.3) 18]NO • H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 ls the wetland: within 5 mi (8km) of a brackish or salt water csruary OR within 3 mi ofa large field or pasture (>40 aaes) OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? {;8lYES -I naint []No= o ~inu Total for page _L Wetland Rating Form -westc:rn Washington version 2 " August 2004 Wetland nan,e or number~ H 2.l Nm or adifC9JI to othq etiorin: bJlbibrh lise;I by WQPW (w "p. UJ Which of the following priority habitats are within ]]Oft ( IOOm) of the wetland? (NOTE: lM COMCCifonf do IIOt hal'I! to H ~Ja.tiwly uruiisbirbed. ' 71iae Orf$ DEW th:finitio,u. C/wd willi}'OU; load oFW biolOgis/ lftlwre lire anyfllulions 181 Ripariu: The ~ adjacent to aquatic systemS with flowing Wll1a' that contains demenu of both aquatic and terrr:strial ecosystcmll which mutually influence each other. 0 Aspen Studs: Pure OI' mixed stands of aspen grcata' than 0.8 ha (l ~es). 0 OifTs: Cheater than 7.6 m (lS ft) high and occurring below SOOO fl 0 Old-&rowtb foresb; (Old-gro'Nlh weJt ofeucade a-est) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 20 ti"ees/ha (8 trees/w::re) > 81 cm (J::Z in) dbh or> 200 yean of age. 0 Mata re fon:sb: Stands with average diameters exceeding Sl cm (21 iri) dbh; Cl"Own oover may be less that I 00%; decay, dccada1ce, numba-, of snags, and quantity of Imp downed material i, generally less than lhal found in old-gro....di; 80 • ::ZOO years old west of the Cascade aest. 0. Prairies: R.ewively undisturbed areas (as indicated by dominance of native plants) where grasses and/or fGrbs Imm the natural climax plant community. 0 Talas: Homogenous ~ of rock rubble ranging in avenge size 0.15 • ::Z.O m (O.S • 6.5 ft), composed of basalt. andesite. and/or sedimenwy rode, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associa:ted with cliffs. 0 Caves; A naturally occurring cavity, recess, vuid, oc l)"Slcm ofinten:onnectcd passages 0 Orqoa wbite Oak Woodlands Stands of pure OU or oalc/conifer a.uociatiom where canopy coverage of the OU component of the stand is 25"!.. 0 Urbaa Natural Open Space: A priority apecics resides within or is adjacem to the open space and uses i1 for breeding and/oc regular feeding; and/or the open space functions u a corridor connecting other pr/Ority habitlJIY, especiaUy those that \>/Ould otherwise be isolated; andfor die open space: i, an ilolated remnant of natural habiw larger lhan 4 ha (10 aeres) and iuumnmded by urban ..... .,-. 0 E'.itaU')"JEs1 .. ry~ike: Deepwater tidal habitats and adj-.cnt tidal wetlands, usually semi-enclosed by land but with open, partly obstruc=d or sporadic access to the open ocean, and in which ocean watef is at least occasionally diluted by frabwatu runoff from the land. 1be salinity may be periodically increased abow that of the open ocean by evaporation. Along some low-energy coastline,: there is appreciable dilution of ,ea water. Estuarine habital extends upstream and land~ to where ocean-derived salu mcaiurc less than O.Sppt. during the period of avenge annual D low flow. Includes both estuaries and lagoon,. Marind&t .. riae SbordUles: Shorelines irKlude the intertidal and subtidal :wna of beaches, and may also include the bacbhoce and adjacait. oompona,u of the terrestrial landscape (e.g., cliffs, snags, mature trees, dllnC9, meadow,) Iha! are imponant to shoreline associated fish and wildlife and that contribute to shoreline function (e.g.. sand/rocldlog recniitmcnt. nutrient contribution, erosion oontrol). · 1£"11Cllaod has 3 or a,ore priority hnbitats-4 points lf-,tlaod has ::Z priority habitats• 3 points If wetland ha I priority habitst • l polal No habitats• 0 points Note: All "MgutzUd wr:tlantb an by th:finitfon o priority hobilal but are not inclwkd In this fisL Nuuby-tlands are addrund In question H 2.4, Wetland Rating Form -western Washington venion 2 16 August 2004 It:'.-::: ~ r-:-;.,~ .. .', ..... t~.,..-J k.;;:l t;;.;,.; ~ Wetlandnameornllmbc:I"~ H 2. 4 W etJand Lapd:,capc (choost. the one descnptton of the landscape around the wetland that but fits) (sup. 14) There are at least 3 other wetlands within \/z mile, and the COJlDCCtions between them are relatively undistw'bed (light grazing between wc:tlmds OK, as is lake shore with soinc boating, but connections should NOT be biSC:ctcd by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development · points ., The wetland is Lake·fiingc on a lake with little disturbance and there arc 3 other lake- fringe wetlands within Vi mile poiJlls = There arc at least 3 other wetlands within Yi mile, BUT the connections between them arc disturbed points= The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within \/z mile . po~= There is at least l wed.and within \/z mile. points - There arc no wctlands within \/z mile. ooints- H 2. TOT AL Score .opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores ;n the column abuiJe TOTAL_forH l from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H 1, H 2 and record the resull on p. I Comments ~ kw.-~ 3 7 8 15 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 17 August2004 l;,~-:l ~ &·,,,.,_,_ • .,,,. ---·-.v..:i ........., • .,.._.r;.""4 ,....,.r.·-..1 Wetland name or numbcr-1_ CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wdland meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wetbiii:l".Tjpe Category c~ci off~ criteria thaJ JtJiy'Jo i~ ~~ .. ~!«; the appropriate Ca/ego,j, (from · 1.~nniri in.CategQ,y.roliunn}:wJie;;tKtappropri'dte:afteritiaremet. ~· ~-:·· SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands (sup. 86) Does the wetland meet the following aiteria for Estuarine wetlands? 0 Tbe dominant water ~gime is tidal, 0 Vegetated, and D With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. DYES -GCJ ~'! ~~_!J~NO SC 1.1 ls the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Parle, National Estuary Reserve, Nanual Area Preserve, State Parle or Educational, Envirorunenlal, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332.30.1517 nYES -Category I []No go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland at least I KR: in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES"" Category I NO= Category Il 0 The wetland is rdatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching. filling, cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10-/. cover of non-native plant species. If the non.fiative Sportina spp. are the only species that cover more than IO"h of the wetland, then the wetland Should be given a dual rating (1/11). Toe area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the rdatively undistmbed upper marsh with native species would be a Category L Do not, however, exclude the area ofSpartina lD determining the size threshold of I aae. D At least'/, of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, (Ol"CSl, or Wl·grazed or un•mowed grassland. D The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, dep~ions with open water-, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Wetland Rating Fonn -western Washington version 2 18 Cat. I Cat. I Cat. II Dual rating VII August 2004 Wetland name or number L SC 1.0 Natural Huitace Wctbn.ds (seep. 17) Nanni Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that suppon. state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 ls the wetland being rated in a Section/Township/lunge that contains a Natura] Heritage wetland? (this quution is used to sett en out most sites be/on you need 10 contact WNHPIDNR) S/f/R information from Appendix D ~ or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site 0 YES 0-contact WNHP/DNR(sce p. 79) and go 10 SC 2.2 NO!i'J SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? DYES• Category I [JNO_not in a Heritage Wedand SC 3.0 Bop (sup. 11) Docs the wel1and (or part of the wetland) meet both the aitcria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use t~ key below to itkn1ify if the wetland iso bog. If you answu yes you will still nttd to rtm 1M waland bas~ on itr Juncdons. 1. Docs the unit have organic soil horizons (i.e. la yen of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (Sec Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils) YesQ-gotoQ.3 No[8lgotoQ.2 2. Docs the wetland have organic soils, either pcau or mucks that are !CS! than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an i..mpenneablc hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that arc floating on a l.ake or pond? ' Yes D. go to Q. 3 No [8J. !snot a bog for pwpose of rating 3. Docs the wetland have more than 70-/. cover of mosses at ground level, AND ocher pl.ants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegctlltion (more than 30-J. of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes 0-Is a bog forpUipOSC of rating No 0-go to Q. 4 NOTE: If you are unccnain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that aitcrion by measuring the pH oflhe water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than S.O and the "bog" plant species in Table 3 arc present, the wetland is a bog. 4. Is lhc wel1and forested (> 30% cover) with sidca spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western bemloclc, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen. Englcmann's spruce, or western white pine, WITH any of the species (or combination ofspe.cies) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover(> 30% coverage. of the totoi shrublherboccow covu)? YES D -Category I NO O ls not a bog for purpose of rating Cat.I Cat. I Wetland Ra.ting Form -western Washington version 2 19 August 2004 Well.and nam: or mimbcf J SC 4.0 Forutcd Wcttands (sup. 90) Docs the wetland have at least l acre of forest that meets one of these criteria re.-the Department ofFish and Wild.life's forests as priority habitats? If you. answer yes yen.: will s1ill need to rate~ wedand based on itsfar,ctions. D Old-crowth forests: (west of Cascade crist) Stands ofat'lcast two tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/aac (20 trees/hectare) lhat arc at least 200 ycan of age OR have a diameter at breast heigh~ (dbb) of32 inches (Bl cm) or more. NOTE: The aitcrion for dbb is based on measurements for upland forests. TwO- hundrm year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbb because their growth rues~ often slower. The DFW aitcrion is and "OR" so old-growth forcsts"do not ncc:cssariJy have to have trees of this diameter. D Mature forests: (west ofcbc Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees arc 80- 200years old OR have aYCnge diameun (dbb) exceeding 21 inches (53cm); crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags., and quantity of large downed material is gc:ncnl]y less than that found in old-growth. [])'.ES• Category I (81 NO not a fOfCSlcd -'1and with special chaixteristics SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lapns (sup. 91) Docs the wetland meet an of the following aitcri.a ofa wetland in a coastal lagoon? 0 The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or parti.al.ly separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, """' D The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water th.at is saline or brackish(> O.S ppt) during most oftbc year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measwed near 1he bottom) 0 YES -Go to SC S.l NO [El not a wetland in a coastal l.agoou SC S. l Docs the wetland meet all of the following three conditions? 0 The wetland is relatively undisturbed (bas no diking, ditching, filling. cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20-J. cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 74). D At least% of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or·un. grazed or un-mowcd grassland. D The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre (4350 sqtlaR: feet) YES 0.. Category I NO 0= Category TI Wetland Rating Form -western Washington vcnion 2 20 Cat.I August 2004 I':"":'.':". ,.,........~ -Q.:~,...,.~'1 ~ ... ,~ .•. :.: Wetland IWMOf nuni,er~ SC 6.0 lntrnlunal Wetlands (sup. 93) ..., ..... ,._.~ ....,..., ,...._., .. .,,,,.. ~-~ I!;:,,.,,; Is the wctJand west oftbc 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? 0 YES = Go to SC 6.1 ~NO -not an interdunal wetland for rating If you t111nttr ya you will mJJ nud to ,au the ~tliuul based on its /llllCtU}ns. In p~cticaJ terms that means the following geographic areas: · L<mg Beach Peninsula-lands west ofSR103 . Graytand-Westport-lands west OrsR IOS Ocean Shores.Copa.tis-lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 ls the wetland ooe aac ca-larger, or U it in a mosaic of wetlands that is one acre or ,.,..,, D YES • Categmy n D NO go to sc 6.2 SC 6.2 Is the wetland betwettr. 0.1 and I acre, oc is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and I aa:e,7 D YES -Category m (:attp_rj'of.W(_tliild:~'OQ;_S~i-~1;€1ii"ia"ctm.1d.a . : ., .• _____ '. · Chad.re the "hig1,!!$1H 'f_afjfiJJ;~,i~,f!f~i#fs?i,efal c~cgorici, and ret;ord ·' :on,p. _I.. . . , -... ,: . <;.:·,:::_,. ,,, .. : . .': .~\.;::-_:. ~,. :, . -RyOU an5Wered-NO fcir.8tftypei futer.~Ncit_:_~_p_p)icabtCn on.p.:1. Comments Wetland R.atiog Form -western Washington version 2 21 -- :-: .. _.:; CatII Cat.III N/A August 2004 L-.:::] ......-.i -.---, -~ "'""''""YJ Wc:d.-.d rwneornumba"~ WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHINGTON Venion 2-Updlted July 2006 to increne ac:anq, and rq,tOduc:ibiliiy aimns usm Name of wetland (if known): Wetland K Date of site visit:3120/2007 & 3(21/2007 Rated by J. Cornwell Trained by Ecology? Yes.[8] NoO Date ofTraining: 11/2006 S~TION: ll TOWNSIDP: 23N RAN~E: SE Is SfT/R in Appendix 07 Yes_NoX Map of wetland unit F.lgure2, 2A, 28, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2F DRAFfSUMMARYOFRATING Estimated size: Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland II __ m~ IV __ Category I== Sc.ore >=70 Score for Water Quality Fun~ons ~8 . Category lI ;=•Score_ 51-69 Scon: for Hydrologi~ F~nctions 16 Category III Score 30-50 · S , Hab. F · 15 Category rv ::: Soon: < 30 con: lOr 1w unctJ.ons TOTAL Scott for functions 49 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACIBRISTICS of wetland J. II_· _ Doos not Apply~ Final Category (choose the .. highest" c_at~ory from above) Check the appropriate ·type: and class Of wetland being rated. • ' <,.•-•, ·~ • .', "";.,_ Estuarine n--rcssional Natural Heritaee Wetland Riverine Bo• Lak.c-frin•e Matutt Fornt Slo- Old Growth Forest Flab Coastal La•oon Freshwater Tidal Interduoal None ofthe above Check if unit hu muhiplc HGMclassQ - Comments Refer to Photo 14; • 25, 525 sf is the on-site area Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 G tr.r-:~1 I I August 2004 Wdl!J>d n.ame at numbos~ Does the wetland being·rated med any of the criteria below? If you answer YES to any of the questions below you _will nctd to protect the wetland ac.cording to the regulations regar_ding the special characteristics fotmd in the wetland. -. . . . .:;i SPI. Has the wetland been documented as a habitat/or any &derally listed Threatened or Eni:ftmgered animal or plant spe.ciu (FIE :speciu)? For the purposes of this rating system, Mdocumented" means the wetland is on the appropriate swc or federaJ database. SP2. Has the wedand unit been documenJ.ed as habital for any State listed · Threawwl or Endangered 01timal spe.ciu? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" meaJ.lS the wetl~d is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species arc categorized as Category 1 NatUJaf Heritage Wetlands (sec p. 19 of data form).· SP3. Doe3 the wetland contain individuals of Priorityspe.ciu listed by the WDFW for the state? · SP4. Dou the wedand have a local significance in addiJion to iu functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. · To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wetland being rated. The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key bc~ow. Seep. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Comments A fonnal habitat and species request has not been submitted; however during the 3/20/2007 & 3/21/2007 field visits no priority habitats and species were observed within the wetland. Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 2 August 2004 • ' unkn unkn unkn unkn L ... , r---, k-•' -·-·--, Wetland nameornwnber~ ,........., h-- ,--. ..-----, ...---., ·--· -.·-·· Classification of\'\'etland Units in Western Washington .....- ;...·,~.~ -·~ l. Are the water levels in the wetland usually controlled by tidis (i.e. except during floods)? C8:INO -go to 2 DYES -the wetland class is Tidal Frin&c -~---·· --..la If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (pans per thousand)? D YES-Freshwater Tidal Frini:e ONO -Saltwater Tidal Frinec (Estuarine) if your wetland con be d.assified o.r a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use tht! forms/or Rh>erine wttlands. If rt 1s Saltwater ndal Fringe it is rated as-an EsuuuiM wt.tland. Wetlands thal wae called estuarine_ in the first and se«md editions of the rating system arc called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in lhe Hydrogcomorpbic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the tCJm "Estuarine" wetland is kept Please note, however, dw: the clw-actcristics tha1 define Categar:y I and II estuarine wetlands have changed (sec p. ). 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it Groundwattt and surface water runoff arc NOT sou.recs of water to the unit i81NO -go to 3 DYES -The wetland class i.s Flats If your wetland ~ be classified as a UFl.au" wetland, IJSC the form for Deprasioml wetlan'4 3. Does the wetland med both of the following criteria? D The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of open water (without any vegetation on the swfau} at least 20 aaes (8 ha) in siie; D At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)? i81NO -go 10 4 DYES -The wetland class is Lake-friuce (Lacustrine Frin&e) 4. Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria? D The wetland is on a slope: (.rlo~ can be very gradual), D The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subswfacc:, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. D The water leaves the wetland without being impollllded? NOTE: Surface waler dou not pond ,n thue type of wetlands uapl occasionally in very small and .rhallow.depreu1ons or behind hummocks( depressions an u.rually <3ft diameter and ltw than /foot deep). i81NO • go to 5 []YES-The wetland class is Slope Comments Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 3 August 2004 -"-'=•.•c-_•,,I -~-·-·-·-4 -i,, •••• ...,J ..-:.~;~ Wahnd name or number~ ~ 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? ........ : 0 The uni_t is in a valley, or stream channel, whCR it.gets inundated by overb~ flooding from that stream or river D The ovcrbank flooding occws at least once every two years. NOTE: The nllf1ri~ 117fit can contain dz:prustoru t/,QJ orefilkdvtth wal6rwMn the river is nQ/jlDoding. i81NO • go to 6 0 YES -The wetland class i.s Riverine 6. ls the wetland in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is sa~ to the surface, at some time of the year. This means thaJ any owlet, if pruent, 1s higher than~ mtenor of the wetland. [8JNO -go 10 7 DYES-The wetland c1ass is Deprusiooal 7. Is the wetland located in a very-flat arca with no obvious depression and DO ovcrbank flooding_ The unit docs not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet 18}No -go to 8 0 YES -The wetland class is Deprasional 8. Your wetland seems 10 be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base ofa slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland bas a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF TI-IE HYDRO LOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS I· 7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch 10 help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate das5 to use for the raling system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second colwnn represents IO% or more of the total area of the wccland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in colUIWl 2 is less than IO-A. of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that rqrrescnts more than 90"A. oftbc U>!al .,.._ -,:..MiPf.ili(i_;.'iiJ.fmil'l~iluii!l~t1'iiiiik.'t."9:."--:!_· w ::~.:: _ -" ' Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope+ Dcprcssional Dep,c,,ional Slope+ Lake-fringe Lake-fringe Depressiona.l + Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Dcpressional + Lake-fringe Dcprcssional Salt War.er Tidal Fringe and a.o:y other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you arc unable still to detenninc which of the above aitcria apply to your wetland, or you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressioaal for the rating. Commmts Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 4 August 2004 We!land name or number~ D D D D D D D D 1.1 Cliaractcristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: Unit is a depression wilh no sutfai;e water leaving ii (no outlet) points= 3 Wetland has an intmninmtly flowing, OR highly conmiaed, permanently_flowing outlet points= 2 Wetland has an imconmicted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet (perm=fflllyjl(7W/ng) points= l Unit is a '11.11.H dq:n:ssion (Q. 7 on key), or in the Flats das;s, wilh permmeat surface outflow and n• OfflMS Htand •tlet and/or outlet is a man.made ditch points -I (if ditch is /IOl p,mnanmrly jl(7Wtllg tr#D/ unit as "inUr'"1tlt'nlly j1(7Willg "} Provide'photo. or drawili, D l.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface (or dufflayer)is clay or organic (use NRCS definitions} YES points = 4 NO points "'0 D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation ( emergent; shrub, and/or forest class): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation·>= 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent,·ungrazed, vegetation.>"= _1/2 of area points= 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation>"" 1/10 of area points= I Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation <I/IO of.area points= 0 _Miip_,of.Cow.win ~elation classes 01.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. T'his is rhe areaof1M wetland Jhal is porukdforat ~ost 2 monlhs, bu/ dries OuJ somerime during rhe year. Do no1 count the area thal is permanindy ponded Estimale area as the average condition 5 our of 10 yrs. Area seasonally ponded is > 14 total area of wetland Area seasonally ponded is> Y. total area of wetland Area seasonally ponded is < Y. total area of wetland points= 4 points=2 points=O ·:tro~odS Total forD 1 Add Jhe poin1s in the boxes above D 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or.surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, !~es or groundwater downgradient from the wetland? Nore which of the following conditions provide t/14 sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources, bur any single source would qualify as opportunity. 0 Gn.zing in dte wedand or ..-ilhin ISO ft · D Untrubod stonmQter disdimJe$ II) wetland 0Til1ed fields or orchanh ..-ithin ISO ft of wetland 181 A stream or culvert discharges inb) wetland lhlt drains devdopc,d -, residential areas, fanMCI field!, mads, or dear<Ut logging . 181 Residential, ll!bln an::as, golf counes are within ISO ft of wetland 0 Wed and is fed by groundwater hi ah in phosphonls or nitrogen Q_Otbef -- YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from DI by D2 Add score 10 table on p. I 2 0 Flgurej1 3 F1gme-z ' 9 (SCt'p.44) multiplies' • 18 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 5 August 2004 Wellaodnameornwnbe:r~ D D D D D D D 3. Does the wetland have the potendal to reduce flooding and erosion! D 3.1 Characteristics of surface waier flows out of the wetland unit Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving ii (no outlet) poi nu ... -4 Unit hli.s an intermittently flowing, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points -2 Unit is flat depression (Q. 7 on key), or in the FIIIU class, with pmnanent surface outflow and no obvious natural oudet 1111d/or is a man-made ditch points a I (If d,tcli is nor ~rrrumently flowing tmlt ,mil as "mtermittenlly jlowingH) Unit has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet (pennanently flowin: ,ints"" 0 D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods Eslimale rhe height of ponding abov~ rM bouom of Jhe outlet. For units with no oudet measu.re from the su.iface of pe.rmonent waler or deepest part (if dry). Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points= 7 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland" points= 5 Marks ofpoDding between 2 ft to< 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points= 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to< 2 ft from swface or bottom of outlet points = 3 Wetland is flat {yes to Q 2 or Q. 7 on key) but has small depressions on the surfucc that trap water points = I Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft points"" 0 D 3.3 Contribution of wetland to storage in the watershed Eslimale Jlre ratio af the area of upstream basin cont.ribuiing swface waler to the we/land to lhe area of the wellandunil ii.self. The area of the basin is less than l O times the area of unit The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit Entire unit is in the FLA TS class points= 5 points= 3, points= O ints = 5 Total for D 3 Add the point.s in t~e boxes above D 4. Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce Ooodlng and erosion! Answer YES if the wetland is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction in water velocity it provides, helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood glltc, tide gate, flap valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 909!. of the.water in the wetland is from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur. Nore which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. D Wetland is in a headwater ofa river or stream that has flooding problems 181 Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems D Wetland has no outlet and impounds swface nmoffwater that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems 00the, --. . [8JYES multiplier is 2 []No multiplier is 1 TOT AL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add score. to table on p. I Comments r-P.46J Agu,:_.zej 2 Fi(lltiNl.6] 3 Figure··, 3 8 (set'p.49} multiplier • 16 Wetland Rating Fonn-western Washington version 2 6 August 2004 • .. , -~;,-, .--. . Wetland _name or number£ ........ ~,.,.. _ _,, L .. ~.e f,,·-"_j ~~-"-.. J ,.............. ... ~---·.·* H t. Doc, the wetland ban the potential to provide habitat for many spccic:s! H l.l Vegetation structure (.ru p. 71) Check the types of vegetation classes present (as <kfined by Cowardin)-Size threshold for each class i.r V, acre or more than JO% of the area if w,it ,s smaller than 2.5 acres. D Aquatic bed 18] Emergent plants C8J Scrub/shrub (areas where shrubs have >30% cover) t8J Forested (areas where trees have >30% cover) !f..!.he umt has a forested class check 1f D Forested areu have 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, heri>aceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20"!. within the forested polygon Add the number of "'egetation types tha.t qualify. 1/ you have: 4 types or more 3 cype.s 2 cype.s Map 'of Co_wardin,veg~--~ points= 4 points= 2 points= 1 I 1ints =O H f2 Hydroocriods (sup. 73) Check the 'types of waur regimes {hydroperiods) present within the wetland The water regime has 10 cover more than 10% of the wetland or% acre lo cowiL (See U!.Xtfor ducriptwnof hydropuiods.) [8'l Permanently flooded or inundated 0 Seasonally flooded or inundated 0 Occasionally flooded or inundated IZI Sarurated only 4 or more types present 3 types present 2 types present points= 3 points .. 2 points -I 0 Pennanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland [8'l Seasonally flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland 0 Lau-fringe wetland:: 2 point! Fnslrwatu tidal wetland• 2 point! H 1.3 Richness of Plant Species (seep. 75) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at lea.st IO ft2. (Different patches of the .same species can be combined to meet the .size thre.slwld.) You do not hm>e to name the species. Do not include Eurasian M1ifo,J, reed canarygrau, purple loosestnfe, Canadian Thistle. If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 S -19 species points= 1 List species below if you want to: <S species points -O r~--, FigurejC 2 Figure1_ 2 Total for page1 Wetland Rating Form -western W a.shington version 2 13 August 2004 ,.,.--.. ..., __ >'" _,. ~ ' ~ ···~·.! ~ ___ _,' / ,.........., --·,-· Wo=tland name am umber~ H 1.4 Interspersion of habitats (sup. 76) Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation ~ses (described in HU), or classes add unveS:etated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none. C)~ .. ·o·> ~-::··\,;,.,· .. _ ~ ~~~ None = 0 points Low= 1 point .Moderate= 2 points / {riparian braided channels] High = 3 points NOTE_: If you have_ four or more c_lasses or three vegetation classes and open water the ratmgis always "high". ~·-~·af .~.yeg~.das$es H 1.5 Special Habitat features· (sup. 77) Check the habitat features that are present m the wetland. The rruMber of checlcs is the number of paints you put into the next column. . D Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). 0 Standing snags (diameter at bottom >4 inches) in the wetland 0 Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft. (2m) and/or overlianging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (lm) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit,. for at least 33 ft (IOm) 0 Stable steep banks of fine material that migb.1 be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have nat yet turned grejvbrown) C8J At least V. acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structure.rfor egg-laying by amphibians) 1:8J Invasive plants cover less lhan 25% of the wetland area in each strarum cif plants Note: The 20% .stated in early prmtings of the manual on page 78 1s an error Comments: H 1. TOT AL Scom -potential for providing habitat .Addlhe scores from Hl.1, Hl.2, Hl.J, Hl.4, Hl-_5 Flgur._!C...! 3 2 JO Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 14 August 2004 Wetland name otnumber.J:.. H 2. Does tf!:e Wdl!nd hllve the op~rtl!nlty_ to prov~e habitat (or many s~es?J • H 2.1 §.yff"m (SU p. 10) '-l Choose 1~ description that but represents condition of buffer _of wedond. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland.fs io be used in the rating. See text/or definttlon OJ "11ndisturbed." D 100 m (330ft) of relatively undistw'bcd vegcwed areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of ciramifcrcnce. No structures are within the undisturbed put of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no grazing, no landscaping. no daily hwnan use) 0 100 m (330 ft) Of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water Points 1 . >SO-!. circwnfcrci-c.e. , Points• D SO m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegctaled areas, roclcy areas, or open water >95% circumference. Points• 1 D 100 m (330ft) ofrd.a:tively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open wata- >25% circumfcn:nce. Points• D 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for > 50"/. circumference. Points• Ir baffer don not mttt any of the thr-ec criteria above D No paved areas (ex.cept paved trails) or buildings within. 25 ~ (80ft) of wetland > 95'!. circumference. Light to moderate grazing. or lawns are OK. Points D No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >5001. circumference. Light to modcme grazing or lawns are OK Points· D Heavy graz.ing in buffer. Points - D Vegetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) formoi:e than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled fidds, paving, bas.alt bedrock extend to edge of wetland) Points· [8l Buffer docs nol meet any of the aittria_ aboye. A'eriat" ~ ahowii,ii' bul'feni Points' H 2.2 Corridors and Cmmections (sttp. 11) H 2.2. l ls the wetland pan of a re~vcly Wldisturbed and unbroken vegetated amidor (either riparian or llpland) that is at least ISO ft wide, has at least 30"/i cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams ;n riparian corridors, Mavlly used ~I roads, paved roads, are considend b~ in the corridor). (]YES .. 4 points (go to H 2.3) C81NO = go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland pan of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, bas at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and oonne.cts to estuaries, otha-wetlands or undisturbed uplands that an: at least 25 I aaes in size? OR a Lab-frinze wetland, ifit docs not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? DYES-2 points (go to H 2.3) i8JNO -H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi (8km) of a brackish or salt water esnwy OR within 3 mi ofa large field or pasrure (>40 aacs) OR within I mi of a lake greater than 20 aaes? [8JYES = I ooint ONO "'0 ooints T otaJ for page _L Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 IS August 2004 Wed and name or nllllmff K. H 2.3 New ptpdfacgrt IO 0Wt pcigtity h•hiWI lisNI by WDfW ~p. 11) Whid,. of the following priority habrtltl ce withm 330ft (100m) of the wetland? (NOTE: W connections do IIOt lwne ID be rdatndy llndistur6ed. · 171ue are DFW dejinit/otu. Check with your local DFW blologlst if lMre are any q,,eitions 181 Ripariaa; 1be arra adjacmt to .cp.tatic system, with fJowins w.m:r that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each Olm. 0 Atpea Staads: Pure or mixed standsofupcn greater than 0.8 ha (2 ea-es). 0 Oif&: Greater than 7.6 m(25 ft) high and occurrin8 belowSOOO ft. D C>ld-vfftla forests: (Old-gn>wth west ofCuaide aesi:) Sumds oht least 2 tree specie$, forming• multi-layered canopy with oeeasional small openings; with at lea.st 20 treesiha (8 trees/acre)> 81 em (32 in) dbh or> 200yClll'I ofase. D Mata:re rorms: Stands with average diamcten ~ing 53 em (21 in) dbh; ero'M! cover may be less that I 00%; deesy, decadence. numbers of map, and qwintiry of lqc downed material is gcnendly less than that found in old·growth; SO· 200 year, old west of the ease.de crest. 0 Prairies: Rdati.;eiy un(li,mrbed ~(., indicated by dominance of native plants) where gruses and!OT forbs fonn d,e Mb.nl climax plant community. 0 Talas: ffomogenousaius of rock rubble Bnging in average size 0.15 • 2.0 m (O.S • 6.S ft). composed of basalt, andcsite. and/or sedimentary rod:. including ripn:p slides and mine tailings. May be assoeiatcd with cliffs. 0 Caws: A naturally oe.cuning cavity, rec:as, void, or l)'Stem of intcn::onncetcd passages 0 Orqoa ..-bite Oak: Woodland, Stands of pure oak or oalc/eonifcr assoeiations where canopy covuagc of the oak omnponcm of the stand is 25%. 0 Urltn Natunl ()pm Space: A priority species resides within or is adjacent to the open space end uses it for breeding and/or regular feeding; and/or the open q,ace functions as a corridor connecting other priority habltlltr, e,pecially those that would otherwise be isolated; and.for the open space is 1111 isolated remnant of nattnl habitat larger than 4 ha (10 acres) and is surrounded by urban --0 Estaary/Estaary-llke: Deepwater tidal habitats and adjlCCl'lt tidal -ilands_ usually ,cmi-encloscd by land bu1 with open. partly obdructcd or sporadic access to the open ocan. and in which ocean water is Ill least oeeasiona.lly diluted by freshwater runoff from the land. The ulinity may be pcriodieally increased above that of the open ocean by evaporation. Along some low-energy cc,astlines there is appreciable dilution of1e11 water. Estuarine habitat extends upstream and landward to where oecan-derivcd salts measure less than 0.Sp-pt. during the period of avenge annual low flow. Includes both estuaries and lagoons. 0 Marine/Estnrine Shol'flines: Shorelines include the intcnidal and wbtidal %.OllC$ of beaches. and may also include the baebhorc and adjacent componenu of the terrestrial landscape (e.g, cliffs., snag!. mature trees. dunes, meado.....-s) that arc important to dwrdinc associsted fish and wildlife and that contribute lo shordine function (e.g., sand/roekllog recruitment. nutrient eontribution. erosion eontrol). If wetland has 3 or i:110tt priority habitats• 4 points If wetland has l-priority habitats os 3 poinll If wetland has I priority habitat• 1 pol at No habitats,.. 0 points Note: .A.11-..egrtaledwttltmtb are by definition o priority hobitat Ind are nol inchldtd in this lisL Ntarl;,y wtl/andsartaddrtnuiinquution H 2.4, Wetland Rating Form-western Washington version 2 16 AuB1:1st 2004 .. ~; -" -__ ~ ,---......... 0,.-----~-~~~ I'"""""' $1,".-.c,-_ • .,.., -. ~ i:.,.,.,_,.,., ,- Weu.id name or number~ H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one rkscnptlon of the landscape around the wetlond that ~st fits) (sup. 14) There arc at least 3 other wetlands within 1/1 mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fidds, or other dcvelopmcnL points .. The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there arc 3 other lake- fringe wetlands within Yi mile points,;: There arc at least 3 other wetlands within Vi mile, BUT the connections between them arc dismrbcd points= The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there arc 3 other lalcc-friogc wetlands within Vi mile points'"' There is at least l wcdand within Vi mile. poim.5 .. There arc no wcdands within Vi mile. ooints'"' H 2. TOT AL Score -opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores m lhe 'column above TOTAL for HI from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H I, Hi and record the result on p. I Comments ,...._ ................. 3 6 IO 16 Wetland Rating Fonn -western Wa!hington version 2 17 August2004 ~ Wetland D.tlDI: or nwnbcr \(_ CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wetland meets. the aaributes described below and circle the appropria:Je answers and Category. -w~1!Jr,pe·· /'··· ,· , ... ,. _-__ , .,.-· .,._, 01 ·.~· ---······.·.c~tegGry ;Che<;~ air mJ cri_u_ril(l_ ~~t apply to ilie -w_~. ~~-_t~,apprfJJirlfite ~gory (!70!'!, , dio"ndnwn mt!7tu ·m Cate<n>,.,,_coflDM) .whiii t}ie mtrimrtiiau criteria cin met. . .-• SC 1.0 Estuarine wcdands (seep. A6) · · · y · Docs the wetland meet the following aiteria for Estuarine wetlands? D The dominant water regime is tidal. D V cgetated, and D With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. OYES=GotoSC I.I 1'8]NO SC 1.1 Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Parle, National Estuary Reserve, Natural Arca PrcSCl'Vc, State Parle or Educational. Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? hYES .. Catee:orv I rlNO ~ to SC 1.2 SC l.2 Is the wetland at least I acre in size and meets at least two of the Cat. I following three conditions? YES -: Category I NO -Category II Cat. I D The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, dilcbing, filling, cultivation, Cat. JI grazing, and has less than l O"/o cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp. arc the only species that cover more than 10% of the wetland, then the Dua.I wet1and should be given a dual rating (Vil). The area of Spartina would be rated a ranng Category II while the relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a Category I. Do not, however, exclude the acea ofSpartina in dcten:ni.ning the Ull siu: tlueshold of 1 acre. D At least lf., of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, Ot UD•grucd QI" WHDOWcd grassland. D The wetland has at least 2 of the following featuru: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguow freshwater wetlands. ---.•.. -.. Wetland Rating Fo1tn -wcs1cm Washington version 2 18 August 2004 Wetland name or number~ SC 1.0 Natural Heritqe Wetlands (s« p. 17) Natural Heritage wct1ands have been identified by the Wwiington Natura! Heritage Progmn/ONR as eithe:r high quality undistuJbed wct1ands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland being rated in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wedand7 (this question i.J used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHPIDNR) S/T/R information from Appendix D [81 ·or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site D YES O -contact WNHP/DNR (seep. 79) and go to SC 2.2 NOl8] SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland u a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? OVEs"' Category I []NO _not in a Heritage Wetland SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 17) Docs the wetland (or pan of the wetland) meet both the aiteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? u~ I~ key beluw to ichntify if t~ wetland is a bog. I/you answer ya you wiJJ. still nttd to rau du wthtnd based on ii$ funt:lklns. I. Docs the uni1 have organic soil horizom (i.e. Iayen of organic soil), either peau or muck:s, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify orgacic soils) YesO-gotoQ.3 Nol8JgotoQ.2 2. Docs the wetland have organic soils, either peats ·or mucks that arc less dum 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as day or volcanic ash. or that are floating on a lake or pond? ·ves O ·goto Q. 3 No [81. Juieta bog forpwpose of rating 3. Docs the wetland have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if prcsc:nt, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more lhan JOO" of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species io Table 3)7 Yes 0-ts a bog forpmpose of rating No Q.go to Q. 4 NOTE: If you are unccna.in about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that aitcrioo by measuring the pH of the water th.at seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the "bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetJand is a bog. 4. Is the wet.land forested{> 30"" cover) with silica spruce. subalpine fir, wcstcm red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann's spruce, or western white pine, WITH any of the species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover (> 30% coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? · YES O -Category I NO O Is not a bog for purpose of rating Cot. I Cati Wetland Raring Form -western Washington venion 2 19 August 2004 Wetland name or nmnbcr~ SC 4.(1: Forakd Wettaods (seep. 90) _ . Docs the wetland have at least I aae of forest that meets one of these aiteri.a for the Department offish i.nd Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer µs you will still tteed to rate the wedand based Ott ltsfimctlons. 0 OlcJ.cro,vth rof"CSts: (west of Cascade crest) Stands ofat least two tree species., forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre (20 trees/hectare) that ai-e at least 200 years ofage OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of32 inches (81 an) or more. NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measuremenu for upland forests. Two- hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh becanse their growth rates are often sJower. The DFW aiterion is and ''OR" so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. 0 Mature. forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80 - 200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches (53an); crown cover may be less that I 00-.4;. decay, decadeuc.e, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth. [)YEs-Category I ~ NO not• forested wetland with special characteristics SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (sup. 91) Does the wed.and meet all oflhe following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? . 0 The wetland lies in a depressioo adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waten by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks 0 The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is Saline or brackish(> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon {tteeds to be measru-ed f'HUlT the bottbm) · 0 YES = Go to SC 5.1 NO Cs:! not a wetland in a coasta1 lagoon SC 5.1 Docs the wetland meet" all of the following three conditions? 0 The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling. cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20"/o cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 74). 0 At least V. of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un- graz.ed or un·mowed grassland. 0 The wetland is larger than 1/10 aae (4350 square feet) YES 0-Category I NO 0= Category II Wetland Rating Fmm -western Washington version 2 20 , • Cat.I August 2004 r:-:: • [ ... .J r:~---r~ ~,-,~_.,J ......... ""'~•w"',! c:. .... ; r:= Wetland n.ame or n~ k... SC 6,0 latcrduoal Wetlands (Kep. 91) Is the wetland west of the 1889 tine (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? 0 YES '"'Go to SC 6.1 f8]NO -not an imerdunal wetland for rating If yoa answer yu you will Sli/1 null to rau tJu wetland based on its functions. In practical tcsms that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula -lands west ofSRI03 • Graylmd-Westport-lands west of SR 105 • Ocean Shores-Copa.tis-lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 ls dte wetland one aae or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands tha1 is one acre or larger? 0 YES -Category II D NO go to SC 6.2 SC 6.2 Is the wetland between 0.1 and l acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is betWccn 0.1 and l aae,'1 ,-, ....... , ••• ..4 Cat.II c_,t~ry.-~fw_~4-~~~5.~15ii;'F,~ ... _ -. -I Cat.III I Choose 1M "lughtst" ranng if ~tl<e!4 falli mto·sevi,fal ·categories, -and record ~P.1_._· · ·_· ,:---~ ,---._.-,._ ·, r :·.·'"' -. ·.-:.,,.; ··-.... -.v. · · -.. -• · ··Ifyou·~_c:red NO'for-all types 'eiitert!-NotAPPlicable" on p. ·1. NIA Comments . Wetland Rating Fann -wcstc:m Washington version 2 · 21 August 2004 -=:J ~-----~~ ~-~ L. ~-; -:.:.: ..• _; ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 April 7, 2008 TO: Trishah Bull, Project/Planner Manager III, Current Planning Section FM: Pat Simmons, Engineer II, Engineering Review Section Via: Ray Floren!, Engineer III,Engineering Review Section Planner: Shannon Dorr RE: Proposed Short Plat for Wilsonffran LUSD File.No. L08S0021 Comments of the above project I. The location of at least two monuments must be show on the map (KCC I 9A.08. 130(B)). We cannot verify the location is as shown on the map. 2. The Land Surveyor Stamp should be map page per KCC 19A.08. I SO(B) 3. The Bench mark shall be tied to King County Control Network Benchmark Elevation. (KCC I 9A.08. I 30) 4. Need 2 Temporary Benchmarks within the application site along with appropriate elevation and Datum(per KCC I 9A.08.150(B)(2)) 5. The contours must be based on a field survey per KCC l 9A.08. I 50(B)(2). A statement to this effect must be shown on the preliminary map. 6. No information was provided if this was a legal lot. 7. The area of density calculation is 2.57 acres per the assessor. , ~ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 206-296-6601 www.kinqcounty.gov March 31, 2008 Brenda Tran 12055 SE I 78'h Street Renton, WA 98058 Ed Wilson 17834 120th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98058 RE: Pennit Fee Estimate: L08S002 l -Wilson/Tran Short Plat Pennit Type: Preliminary Short Plat Dear Ms. Tran & Mr. Wilson: The Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) has implemented a program for managing certain types of pennit applications to provide customers with an enhanced level of customer service. The Project Management Program seeks to provide customers with increased predictability for the permit process and better accountability from County review staff. For pennit applications under Project Management, a project manager is assigned to the pennit to facilitate communication with the applicant and provide a fee estimate to cover the anticipated scope of review. The project manager will also monitor and manage the pennit application throughout the review process to ensure review schedules remain in line with performance standards and the overall work hours are within the range of estimated fees for the project. Your application was received by our office on February 29, 2008 and will be processed by a Project Manager. The enclosed information provides a summary of the fee estimate for the anticipated work disciplines associated with the preliminary review phase and fee estimate revisions which may affect the pennit fees. Please return the signed Acknowledgment Form, page 2 of the enclosure, to my attention at the address specified in the Jetter head. Failure to return the Acknowledgement Form and pay the deposit within 17 days of the date of this letter may result in the suspension or cancellation of the application. lfyou have any questions regarding the permit fees, the requirements of the project management program or any other aspects of the review process, please contact me via e-mail at trishah.bull@kingcounty.gov or by telephone at 206-296-6758. Sincerely, l~?. .. ~ Land Use Services Division (LUSD) Enclosure cc: Lisa Dinsmore, Supervisor Current Planning Section, (LUSD), (DDES) • ~ King County Land Use Services Division Permit Fee Estimate Permit Number: L08S0021 Date: March 31, 2008 Permit Title: Wilson/Tran Short Plat Permit Type: Preliminary Short Plat Based on pennit infonnation submitted by the applicant, the Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) has detennined the amount of review fees for the subject application. The fees shown below do not include ancillary pennit fees, recording fees, project-related mitigation fees or other fees that are passed through to the applicant from other agencies, or as part of the project's environmental review. Fixed Fees: Bldg Fire Flow Review Counter Service Fee for Application Intake Total Fixed Fees: Estimate for Hourly Fees: (150 Hours x $140.00) Total Permit Fee Estimate: Amount Due at Application (100% fixed fees plus 50% of hourly fee estimate is clue.) Less Amount Paid Amount Due at Application Balance (due immediately) Pennit Fee Estimate Balance to be paid via installments $139.00 $284.00 $423.00 $21,000.00 $2).423.00 $10,923.00 $10,503.00 $420.00 $10,500.00 Note: The estimate for hourly fees stated above is based on the total estimated number of hours for your project, not to exceed 150 hours and is calculated using the department's hourly rate in effect at the time the estimate is completed. The total estimated hours reflect work perfonnecl by some, or all, of the following disciplines: Engineering, Land Survey, Engineering Technical Support, Site Development, Critical Areas, Traffic, Project Management and Planning. Please see attached Fee Estimate Worksheet for specific fees. Based upon the attached fee estimate revisions, the number of hours required may be modified. Your pennit will be billed using the installment plan you select, not to exceed six equal monthly payments. Your first Project Management Statement will reflect the installment schedule to be paid for your pennit. You may choose to pay the balance in full or make monthly payments. To avoid finance charges, please submit the minimum payment each month. If you have questions about the billing statement, please call Elaine Gregory, Finance Manager, at 206-296-7139 or the Billing Hotline at 206-296-6659. ' ~ King County Land Use Services Division Fee Estimate Acknowledgment Form and Revision Policy Permit Number: L08S0021 Date: March 31, 2008 Permit Title: Wilson/Tran Short Plat Permit Type: Preliminary Short Plat Estimated Maximum Hours: 150 Applicant: Brenda Tran & Ed Wilson Total Fee: $21,423.00 Not later than 17 days after the date of this fee estimate letter. the applicant must submit a signed copy of this form to ODES. disputing the estimated cost of this permit and that s/he has read the DOES policy relevant to fee estimate revisions stated below •. Failure to do so will result in the loss of your right to dispute and appeal the estimate and may result in cancellation of the application. Fee Estimate Revision Applicants are responsible for all fixed fees, reported hours performed in reviewing submittal materials and processing, up to the fee estimate. Changes in the scope of the project review will result in a revised review fee estimate. Fee estimates are based on information submitted to DOES by the applicant prior to finalization of the permit application. In addition, estimates are determined by utilizing historical data gathered from projects of similar type, size, and scope. The fee estimate will be the maximum fees charged unless the scope of the project changes. Should fewer hours be required to complete the review, the applicant may receive a refund for those hours. If items are identified that are not originally disclosed, a new estimate may be required. Applicants will be responsible for any additional hours identified in a new estimate if: 1. The applicant fails to provide accurate, complete, or timely information. 2. The applicant fails to disclose a site or development issue that creates the need for additional review that could not have been reasonably anticipated by the Project Manager during the preparation of the previous Fee Estimate. 3. The applicant changes the scope or design of the proposal, creating the need for additional review that could not have been reasonably anticipated by the Project Manager during the preparation of the previous Fee Estimate. 4. The applicant fails to complete the construction of the project in a timely manner, creating the need for additional review, unanticipated by the Project Manager during the preparation of the previous Fee Estimate. 5. The applicant files an appeal and the Fee Estimate did not anticipate an applicant appeal. 6. The applicant makes a request to separate the review of the project into distinct phases. 7. There has been unauthorized construction on the property, including, but not limited to, clearing or grading, or an associated code enforcement case is opened. 8. The King County Council modifies pem1it fees. 9. The project is modified, such that there is a change in the building valuation and the resulting building valuation fees. Keeping review fees at or below the fee estimate will depend on the applicant's commitment to complete the process review. This commitment should include submitting materials which address all County codes, policies, previously approved conditions and responding to the County's request for corrections or additional information in a timely manner, not to exceed 90 days. D Accept the Fee Estimate D Dispute the Fee Estimate Applicant/Owner Name (print) Date Applicant/Owner Name (signature) File Number: L08S002l Return to: Trishah Bull 2 ' t{J King County INFORMATION ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS, BILLING/PAYMENT REQUIREMENTS, INSTALLMENT PAYMENT PLANS, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS, APPEALS AND FINANCE CHARGES. Your application is being reviewed under the Project Management program, you will be provided a budget estimate that is based on historic averages and the information you provided with the application. Once you have received the estimate, it is your responsibility to contact the Project Manager and make arrangements for payment plans. Checks may be made out to King County Finance. The Department may remove your project from the Project Management program under the following conditions: • During project review, the applicant changes the proposal to such an extent that the project is below the Project Management threshold. • To accommodate State and Federal procurement regulations. • In accordance with other contractual agreements between the Department and the applicant, including but not limited to Financial Guarantees. • The applicant requests and the Department concurs, if the Department determines that no value will be added to the overall project or it creates a redundancy in the Project Management process. • Projects in default as defined by K.C.C. 27 A.20.020. PROJECT MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS: You will receive a monthly statement showing any used hours against the estimate. The statement also lists all fees and any past due amount, installment due or budget adjustments that must be paid by the first of the following month. PAYMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS: Your permit submittal may qualify for participation in a DDES Finance Section policies installment plan. Under the plan, you must pay an initial amount, typically 50% of the fee estimate plus JOO% of the fixed fees. The remaining balance will be billed in monthly installments. Each monthly statement will include any past due amounts, current fees, or budget adjustments, and any installments due by the first of the following month. You will be required to pay the 'Total Amount Due' as reflected on the "Remittance Advice" page for your Project Management Statement. Any remaining balance will.be billed in equal monthly installments on subsequent Project Management Statements. You may make full payment of the 'Total Balance' reflected on the first page of the Project Management Statement at any time; however you must make the amount due on the remittance advice in order to avoid finance (late) charges. If the project is approved before all of the installment payments are billed, all outstanding balances will be billed on the subsequent statement. FINANCE CHARGES: To avoid finance charges, payment will be required prior to the due date listed on the remittance advice of the statement. Finance charges are assessed on the outstanding delinquent balance. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND APPEALS: By checking the Accept t/refee estimate box, the applicant/owner accepts the fee estimate provided in this letter and waives the right to dispute the estimate. By checking the Dispute t/refee estimate box, the applicant contests the fee estimate and requests a Director review and appeal of the fee estimate. The applicant must return the acknowledgement form accompanied by a statement of facts supporting the dispute to DDES within 17 days of the date of this fee estimate letter. DDES will issue a decision within 14 days of receipt of the applicant dispute. DDES' decision is final unless the applicant files with DDES a combined Notice and Statement of Appeal together with the $50 appeal fee within 17 days after DDES mails the decision. The applicant may only appeal an adverse decision, in which DDES denied all or a portion of the dispute. The appeal is heard by the Hearing Examiner, who will conduct a closed record hearing on the fee estimate appeal. The burden is on the applicant to demonstrate that the fee estimate is unreasonable. If the Hearing Examiner determines that DDES' fee estimate was unreasonable, the Hearing Examiner may modify the fee estimate or provide other relief the Hearing Examiner determines is reasonably necessary. If the applicant is the substantial prevailing party on the appeal, the $50 appeal fee is refunded. The Hearing Examiner's decision is final. Acknowledgement and the required application materials are mandatory prior to the review of the permit application. In addition, you are still required to pay the deposit, current balance and any future installments. Failure to do so will result in finance charges. w King County Land Use Services DMsion CUnent Planning Section Project Management Fee Estimating Worksheet Pemiit Type: Pmlmlnary Short Plat Prepared For: WIIBon[!nm Permit/PreApp No: L08S0021 Permit Type: PRE-SP Counter Service Intake 27 .06.030 Intake Group 3 284.00 B Fire Protection Plan Review 27.10.040 Type of Permit E Short Subdivisions IClanllltP 7 fb:lw&fFfPID .. · ~' r C:--Plannlng'RevleW 27:flt.1)80 35 · I SEPA Threshold: ITPl 0:-Threshold·Determlnation ··21.-- 0 I Prolact 111anaaemen1 Faes: (PM) E:-Generatservlcefee-. -· 27:112:100 20 F:-'DOT'SupportStafl B I Engineering Rovtew: (ER) G:-"Englneering-· ···-21:10:1!60 40 I Final Survey Review: (FR) H:--SU~ew. -~ '27:1(1:200 4 IA!?!PT~f!!i:tGM•:..'t~:~::._,';._,·~. _.i::,,:~., ~ .. • ,. ,;. 7 . .,;: ,·' "jt 1-. --Gradfng-Review'Estimate"above'Base 3 Bu:IDol , ...,.~ ·\[gS _hi _ .. ,: ~. Ell.' ~t .. ~ $ 284.00 $ 139.00 " ___ 3_5 Hrs. HIS. __ 2_0 Hrs. a Hrs. ___ 4_8 Hrs. ___ 4Hrs. H ... t c:#i\4:.~.17'$,·,: ;'."'-''~ .,c .. '~~] $ 4,900.00 ------------------ $ 2,800.00 ------------------ ,_~1 S 1,120.00 b complex l9View and road ~ that S 6,720.00 varies from smndards ], $ 560.00 ------------------ ·. ~"' •~r.,,i';_,_, :,;;;.--::'._.:;.·j, a ' ,, .,.., .. , ,IJ •_;r ~--• -..... --:..:" :··~<-..., -=~ Jdt: : "':'.i.:; -~ r:·7, ~~' ~r:-~ ~;c:~::c ;-;. '-~~~.: -'tt: -;t1~ )3 j .r.--criticatareN. ..,_27:10:130 GO 22 WL 13 35 3~ J:I!§.. :4~90_0.0_Q_ K. Exceptions and Variances 27.10.140 Estimate: Hrs. IOttmr,RewlewsJSfealb!!ft···'L ~~1'~·-,~~t·-~~-,-_.,;,,,~'-,,;;>"~.--':'_~'"';"".;. ~~.:t-_)·-~~~i~;,~S:-\1>.~'""~~r·" L".'"""Olher'(Shcrelmes;-FPA 27:10;1,10 PR Estimate: Hrs. Update VetWl1 061107 TOl31FbtedFees, Total Estimated Review Hours: $423.0D S 423.00 Hourly Fee: $ 21,000.00 150 Total Fee Estimate: Fee Payment to Date: Balance: Number of lnsta/lements: • ..1.~ ..... ~it:-~~-·::!4·~·:l ,~'"',?';-.,q~ .. 9~9-<+.,~ ··IJ $21,423.00 ® King County REQUEST FOR SCHOOL INFORMATION PRELIMINARY PLATS Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Seivices Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 DATE: March 21, 2008 TO: Renton School District #403 FM: Trishah Bull, PPMIII RE: Proposed Wilson/Tran Short Plat LUSD File No: L0SS0021 The Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has received an application for a subdivision in your District. Enclosed is a copy of the (revised) plat map received by the Land Use Services Division on February 29, 2008. In order for us to adequately evaluate this proposal, provide the most accurate information to the public, and for LUSD to serve the School District better, please provide us with the following information: Which schools do you anticipate the students living in this subdivision would attend? Elementary _________________________ _ Jr. High/Middle _______________________ _ Sr. High __________________________ _ Will the students walk or be bussed to these schools? Elementary _________________________ _ Jr. High/Middle _______________________ _ Sr. High __________________________ _ If the students will be bussed, where do you anticipate the bus stops will be located? If that information is not available at this time, currently, where are the closest bus stops located to this site? Elementary _________________________ _ Jr. High/Middle _______________________ _ Sr. High __________________________ _ Other Comments: --------------------------- Please complete this form and return it by March 31, 2008 to the address below. If you have questions regarding this proposal, please call Shannon Dorr at 206-296-6673. Thank you. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN: Shannon Dorr, Project/Program Manager II 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 LUSD/FORMS/CPSFORMS/REQSCHOL.INFO ;t) tJb srJ((.j W-~ I I f._{) ?$0 0~ ( ' ,.,_; .. ,.,. FD40 (E Renton) FD25 Fire Protection Dist #40 Fire Protection Dist #25 10828 SE 176th St P.O. Box 2925 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98056-0925 UlS MS: KSC·TR-0431 KC27 Falrwood Library Gary Kriedt . 17009 -140th Av SE KC Metro Envirn. Planning Renton WA 98058 U20 U23 Highlands Library Kent Regional Library 2902 NE 12th St 212 --2nd Av N Renton WA 98056 Kent WA 98032-4482 U36 Documents Dept. Librarian U24 Renton Library King County Library System 100 Mill Av S 960 Newport Way NW Renton WA 98055 Issaquah, WA 98027 PL18 PL19 Kent Engineering Dept Kent Planning Dept 220 -4th Av S 220 -4th Av S 1!' Kent WA 98032 Kent WA 98032 · City of Renton PL33 Clinton G. Marsh, Director Fae. & Const. Dept SD9 I Economic Development Dept. Kent School District# 415 1055 5. Grady Way 12033 SE 256th St. Bldg B Renton WA 98055 Kent WA 98031-6643 SES R. Stracke, Facilities & Ping SD13 Kent Sewer Utility Renton School Dist # 403 220 -4th Av S 1220 N 4th St Kent WA 98032 Renton WA 98055 TRl Environmental Review Section ST17 Muckleshoo Tribe/Fisheries Division WA State Dept of Ecology 39015 -172nd Av SE PO Box 47703 Auburn WA 98002 Olympia WA 98504-7703 TR3 Fisheries Biologist TR2 Snoqualmie Tribe Puyallup Tribe PO Box 280 6824 Pioneer Wy E carnation WA 98014-0280 Puyallup WA 98371 Fisheries Habitat/Environment TRS TR4 Suquamish Indian Tribe Tuialip Tribe PO Box 498 6 700 Totem Beach Rd Suquamish WA 98392 Tulallp WA 98271 ;. __ .-.. Cedar River Water/Sewer Dist 18421 SE Petrovltsky Rd Renton WA 98058-0552 City of Renton, Public Works Dept. Development Services Div. 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Water Dist #90 15606 SE 128th St Renton WA 98059-8522 Water Dist # 111 27224 -144th Av SE Kent WA 98042-9058 WA State Dept. of Wildlife Habitat Mgmt. Division P.O. Box 43155 Olympia, WA 98504-3155 WA State Dept of Archaeology Attn: Scott Williams P .0. Box 48343 Olympia WA 98504-8343 WD12 WD32 WD55 WD58 Public Works Dtr Kent Water Dist 220 -4th Av S Kent WA 98032 Soos Creek Water/Sewer Dist PO Box 58039 Renton WA 98058-1039 Coal Creek Utility District 6801 132nd Place SE Newcastle, WA 98059 WA State Dept. of Wildlife 16018 Mill Creek Blvd. Mill Creek, WA 98012 Muckleshoot Preservation Program Laura Murphy 39015 172n<J Ave SE Auburn WA 98092-9763 WD23 WD41 WD57 /,)OD 5tT1< ~// t.-0 8S00;) I FD40 (E Renton) FD25 Fire Protection Dist #40 Fire Protection Dist #25 10828 SE 176th St P.O. Box 2925 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98056-0925 LI15 MS; l!;SC-I8-U!IU, KC27 Fairwood Library Gary Kriedt 17009 -140th Av SE KC Metro Envirn. Planning Renton WA 98058 LI20 Ll23 . Highlands Library Kent Regional Library · 2902 NE 12th St 212 --2nd Av N Renton WA 98056 Kent WA 98032-4482 LI36 Documents Dept. Librarian LI24 Renton Library King County Library System 100 Mill Av S 960 Newport Way NW Renton WA 98055 Issaquah, WA 98027 PL18 PL19 Kent Engineering Dept Kent Planning Dept 220 -4th Av S 220 -4th Av S Kent WA 98032 Kent WA 98032 City of Renton PL33 Clinton G. Marsh, Director Fae. & Const. Dept SD9 Economic Development Dept. Kent School District # 415 1055 S. Grady Way 12033 SE 256th St. Bldg B Renton WA 98055 Kent WA 98031-6643 SES R. Stracke, Facilities & Ping SD13 Kent Sewer Utility Renton School Dist # 403 220 -4th Av S 1220 N 4th St Kent WA 98032 Renton WA 98055 TRl Environmental Review Section ST17 Muckleshoot Tribe/Fisheries Division WA State Dept of Ecology 39015 -172nd Av SE PO Box 47703 Auburn WA 98002 Olympia WA 98504-7703 TR3 Fisheries Biologist TR2 Snoqualmie Tribe Puyallup Tribe PO Box 280 6824 Pioneer Wy E Carnation WA 98014-0280 Puyallup WA 98371 Fisheries Habitat/Environment TRS TR4 Suquamish Indian Tribe Tulalip Tribe PO Box 498 6 700 Totem Beach Rd Suquamish WA 98392 Tulalip WA 98271 Cedar River Water/Sewer Dist 18421 SE Petrovitsky Rd Renton WA 98058-0552 City of Renton, Public Works Dept. Development Services Div. 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Water Dist #90 15606 SE 128th St Renton WA 98059-8522 Water Dist # 111 27224 -144th Av SE Kent WA 98042-9058 WA State Dept. of Wildlife Habitat Mgmt. Division P.O. Box 43155 Olympia, WA 98504-3155 WA State Dept of Archaeology Attn: Scott Williams P.O. Box 48343 Olympia WA 98504-8343 WD12 WD32 WD55 WD58 Public Works Dtr Kent Water Dist 220 -4th Av S Kent WA 98032 Soos Creek Water/Sewer Dist PO Box 58039 Renton WA 98058-1039 Coal Creek Utility District 6801132nd Place SE Newcastle, WA 98059 WA State Dept. of Wildlife 16018 Mill Creek Blvd. Mill Creek, WA 98012 Muckleshoot Preservation Program Laura Murphy 39015 172nd Ave SE Auburn WA 98092-9763 WD23 WD41 WD57 ,. -. 6199600221/L08S0021 ANARDI NICKLAUS J 18040 120TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 • 6196600100/L08S0021 BOGOLYUBOV KONSTANTINE 16721 SE NEWPORT WAY ISSAQUAH WA 98027 6197200323/L08S0021 CARDOSO ANA M 18019 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 RN/L08S002 I CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 6196600480/L08S0021 EDWARDS JAMES+LISA 17812 118Tll AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 6197200026/L08S0021 FERNALD THOMAS F JR+DISSEL, 11619 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6196600180/L08S0021 GILL JAGDEV S+SUKHWANT K 11620 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6196600542/L08S0021 GUA BRAD A+CINDYL 11820 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6196600465/L08S0021 HOLT TIMOTHY & KERRY 17806 ll 8lll A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 3323059042/L08S0021 MARGULLIS GORDON+SUSAN 18032 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6199600200/L08S0021 BAGLEY WILLIAM E & DIANNA L 18002 120TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600120/L08S0021 BUCKMEIER LLOYD M+MARLENE J 16547 121ST AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600260/L08S002I CHIDESTER JEFFREY PARKER CHIDESTER VICI 18450 SE 168TH ST RENTON WA 98058 61966002851L08S0021 DIAS WILLIAM R & JUDY K 17809 l 18HI AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6197200360/L08S0021 EDWARDS PATRICA GWENN 18015 120TH SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600521/L08S0021 FLORENCE GORDON J 17852 118TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98055 3820400080/L08S0021 GOODLOELL W 9321 S 225TH PL KENT WA 98031 '6197200384/L08S0021 HAMILTON MICHAEL 0 18033 120TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 619960020J/L08S0021 IVANOV PANAIOT 18018 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600481/L08S0021 MCGOUGH JEFFRY A & CYNTHIA 17832 118TH A VE NE RENTON WA 98058 3820400020/L08S0021 BENNETT WILLIS A JR & MARY 11815 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6197200402/L08S0021 CAMPBELL SCOTT A+L YNDEE R 18043 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6197200403/L08S0021 CHURCH DANNY K 18052 118TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 6197200382/L08S0021 DILAG CHERYL 18038 118TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 3820400060/L08S0021 ENDRES MARK+SHERRY PO BOX 58485 RENTON WA 98058 6197200318/L08S0021 FRONING JULIE K 11641 SE 180TH RENTON WA 98058 6196600440/L08S0021 GOUGH THOMAS+SHIRLEY 17644 118TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600219/L08S0021 HOLMGREN CHRIS S+CYNTHIA L 17845118THAVESE . RENTON WA 98058 SD9/L08S002 l KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #415 G. ANDERSON, PLANT & FACILITIES 12033 SE 256TH ST KENT WA 98031 6196600280/L08S0021 MITCHELL H W 17803 118TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 • 6199600199/L08S0021 MULLEN LETA L 6715 WHITMAN STNE TACOMA WA 98422 6197200363/L08S0021 PRIDEAUX RONALD L 18019120TH SE RENTON WA 98058 6!97200383/L08S0021 ROOTKENW 18036118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6!96600544/L08S0021 SAMUDRE VINA Y V & REBECCA J 18216 124TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98031 6196600460/L08S0021 SCHULZ RICHARD L+DEBRA D 17802118THAVESE RENTON WA 98058 6 I 9720036 J/L08S002 I SHAW JOHN M+DEBRA K 22201 SWEENEY RD SE MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 3323059103/L08S0021 SKAGEN MICHAEL )+LAURA I 2050 SE 178TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6!96600543/L08S0021 SU CHANG HUl+MA MICHAELS I 1828 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 3820400050/L08S0021 WALTERS DEAN C I 1839 SE 180TH RENTON WA 98055 6197200380/L08S0021 WJEHOFF JAMES E JR 18031 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6J96600221/L08S0021 O'KEEFE ROGER G 17853 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6197200401/L08S0021 RATHBUNWD 18045 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 6!96600240/L08S0021 ROYER WILSON MILLER 17831 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6199600202/L08S0021 SCHAFER SCOTT C 18020 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6!97200321/L08S0021 SEATTLE BONDED COLL C/0 SHARON WEEMS 6525 EARL A VE NW SEATTLE WA 98117 3274850!70/L08S0021 SHEELY KEVIN D+CINDY J 12214 SE 179TH PL RENTON WA 98058 3820400030/L08S0021 STECKLER DA YID HELAINE L I 1823 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 3323059048/L08S0021 TRAN BRENDAN 12055 SE 178TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6196600165/L08S0021 WEBSTER GARRY+KIRSTEN 17906 I 16TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600201/L08S0021 WILLIAMS CLARK A 17861 I 18Tl·J AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 3820400010/L08S0021 O'NEAL ILENE A 18010 I 18TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 SD I 3/L08S002 I RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT #403 R. STRACKE, FACILITIES & PLANNING 1220N 4TH ST RENTON WA 98055 6197200381/L08S0021 SALTER SHIRLEY I 103619TH AVE SW SEATTLE WA 98146 61972003 79/L08S002 I SCHMIDT SCHERYL 18037 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 6!97200324/L08S0021 SEVRUK BILL D+CYNTHIA S 11649 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6196600482/L08S0021 SHIRAZ! ELAINE S 17824 !18THAVESE RENTON WA 98058 6196600541/L08S0021 . STECKLER JAMES & VICTORIA I 1806 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6196600300/L08S0021 VENABLE HAROLD+HELEN 17645 I I 8TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 6!96600160/L08S0021 WEISBERG NANCY M+TAMARA B 17914116THAVESE RENTON WA 98058 6196600540/L08S0021 WILSON ED 17844 120TI·I AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 . . 6197200025/L08S0021 WILSON ROSEMARIE 11633 SE 180TH RENTON WA 98058 ' 3820400040/L08S0021 ZAYIC JERRY D+SHERYL L 11831 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 619960022 I/L08S0021 ANARDI NICKLAUS J 18040 120TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 6!96600JOO/L08S002J BOGOL YUBOV KONSTANTINE 16721 SE NEWPORT WAY JSSAQUAH WA 98027 6197200323/L08S0021 CARDOSO ANA M 18019118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 RN/L08S002 J CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 6 J 96600480/L08S002 J EDWARDS JAMES+LISA 17812118TIIAVESE RENTON WA 98055 6197200026/L08S0021 FERNALD THOMAS F JR+DJSSEL, 11619 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6196600180/L08S0021 GILL JAGDEV S+SUKIIWANT K 11620 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6J96600542/L08S0021 GUA BRAD A+CINDY L 11820 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6 J 96600465/L08S0021 HOLT TIMOTHY & KERRY 17806 118TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 3323059042/L08S0021 MARGULLIS GORDON+SUSAN 18032 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6199600200/L08S0021 BAGLEY WILLIAM E & DIANNA L 18002 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600120/L08S0021 BUCKMEIER LLOYD M+MARLENE J 16547121ST AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6 J 96600260/L08S002 I CHIDESTER JEFFREY PARKER CHIDESTER VICI 18450 SE 168TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6196600285/L08S0021 DIAS WILLIAM R & JUDY K 17809 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6J9120036on,08soo21 EDWARDS PATRICA GWENN 18015 120TH SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600521/L08S0021 FLORENCE GORDON J 17852 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 3820400080/L08S002 J GOODLOELL W 9321 S 225TH PL KENT WA 98031 6197200384/L08S0021 HAMIL TON MICHAEL 0 18033 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6 J 9960020 I /L08S002 I JVANOV PANAIOT 18018 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600481/L08S0021 MCGOUGH JEFFRY A & CYNTHIA 17832 118TH AVE NE RENTON WA 98058 3820400020/L08S0021 BENNE'IT WILLIS A JR & MARY 11815 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6197200402/L08S0021 CAMPBELL SCOH A+L YNDEE R 18043 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6197200403/L08S0021 CHURCH DANNY K 18052 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6197200382/L08S0021 DILAG CHERYL 18038 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 3820400060/L08S0021 ENDRES MARK+SHERRY PO BOX 58485 RENTON WA 98058 6197200318/L08S0021 FRONING JULIE K 11641 SE 180TH RENTON WA 98058 6196600440/L08S0021 GOUGH THOMAS+SHIRLEY 17644 118TII AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600219/L08S0021 HOLMGREN CHRIS S+CYNTHIA L 17845 118lll AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 SD9/L08S002 I KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #415 G. ANDERSON, PLANT & FACILITIES 12033 SE 256TH ST KENT WA 98031 6196600280/L08S0021 MITCHELL II W 17803 118TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6199600199/L08S0021 MULLEN LETA L 67 I 5 WHITMAN ST NE TACOMA WA 98422 6197200363/L08S0021 PRIDEAUX RONALD L 18019 120TH SE RENTON WA 98058 6197200383/L08S0021 ROOTKENW 18036 I 18TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600544/L08S0021 SAMUDRE VINA Y V & REBECCA J 18216124TH AVE SE RENTON WA 9803 I 6196600460/L08S0021 SCHULZ RICHARD L+DEBRA D 17802 I 18TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 619720036J/L08S0021 SHAW JOHN M+DEBRA K 2220 I SWEENEY RD SE MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 3323059103/L08S0021 SKAGEN MICHAEL J+LAURA 12050 SE J78Tll ST RENTON WA 98058 6196600543/L08S0021 SU CHANG HUl+MA MICHAELS 11828 SE 180HI ST RENTON WA 98058 3820400050/L08S0021 WALTERS DEAN C I 1839 SE 180TH RENTON WA 98055 6197200380/L08S0021 WIEHOFF JAMES E JR 18031 120TII AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600221/L08S0021 O'KEEFE ROGER G 17853 I 18TII AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6 I 97200401 /L08S002 I RATHBUN W D 18045 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 6J96600240/L08S0021 ROYER WILSON MILLER 17831 I 18TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6 I 99600202/L08S002 I SCHAFER scorr C 18020 120TJJ AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6197200321/L08S0021 SEATfLE BONDED COLL C/0 SHARON WEEMS 6525 EARL A VE NW SEATfLE WA98117 3274850 I 70/L08S002 I SHEELY KEVIN ))+CINDY J 12214 SE 179TJI PL RENTON WA 98058 3820400030/L08S002 I STECKLER DAVID HELAINE L I 1823 SE 180TJJ ST RENTON WA 98058 3323059048/L08S0021 TRAN BRENDAN 12055 SE 178lll ST RENTON WA 98058 6196600J65/L08S0021 WEBSTER GARRY+KJRSTEN 17906 I 16TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600201/L08S0021 WILLIAMS CLARK A 17861 I 18TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 3820400010/L08S0021 O'NEAL !LENE A 18010 I 18TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 SD I 3/L08S002 I RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT #403 R. STRACKE, FACILITIES & PLANNING 1220 N 4TH ST RENTON WA 98055 619720038!/L08S0021 SALTER SHIRLEY I 1036 19TH AVE SW SEATTLE WA 98146 6197200379/L08S0021 SCHMIDT SCHER YL 18037 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 6197200324/L08S0021 SEVRUK BILL D+CYNTHIA S I 1649 SE 180TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6196600482/L08S002I SJ·IIRAZI ELAINE S 17824 I 18TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6J96600541/L08S0021 STECKLER JAMES & VICTORIA I I 806 SE I 80TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6J966003oon,08soo21 VENABLE HAROLD+HELEN I 7645 I I 8Tll A VE SE RENTON WA 98058 6196600160/L08S0021 WEISBERG NANCY M+TAMARA B 17914 I 16TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6J96600540/L08S0021 WILSON ED I 7844 I 20TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98055 6197200025/L08S002 I WILSON ROSEMARIE 11633 SE 180TH RENTON WA 98058 3820400040/L08S0021 ZA YIC JERRY D+SHERYL L 11831 SE 180THST RENTON WA 98058 w ..., -u. w C 0 u 0 w .., "' LU "' :i: ::) z I-v LU -0 "' 0. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 0.1kesdt1le A1't'nuc Southwest Rr't1ton, \\'A 98055-1.'.!19 MEMORANDUM FROM: Site Investigator BE'T}-\ CHESJ:\ I El2 TO: Engineer Cld_l<., F:o s TE]< ( S DOR) RE: Field Che~k Observations I. PROJECT NUMBER/ NAME LDRsooz I / Tl2.At:-.,l-WII.SON I Address I Location 5 E I BorH 5[x J 2.0TI:J A \IE SE Date 1.-( • 3 0 · 8 F"IE.LD ~-2 5· 8 RelatedProject#/Name AOJPEOIS LD]SA 553 I Thomas Map Page (new) {o8Co Thomas Guide Page (old) _______ _ l, SYNOPSIS OF PROPOSAL _5HQ&_"[ P LA r 2. 5 7 Acrz Es OF {<-Co 11'.I.IQ 8-.W,S WATEQ Q\JALlTY &)r; I t:-,.t DDJ,Jl\.lSie~- L-/-t 1:)A-='5 ___________ ----'-¢ _____ _ r-LOW CO['..rrg() L CONS 62.V ATlOLU __ _ 3. SIERRA FILE INFORMATION . * Parcel#(s)019Co(oO 051..0. 05YD S-T-R _N\i',,(33·23·05 ' Kroll Map (e'.)5 Ac,·es / Feet' 2. ,51 A Current Zoning_-"'Q~--(o=----- Community Plan '$00'$ C 12.ff)( Comprehensive Plan ~\..,.J,..rY\~----- Limited Text Entry ------------------------- PAGE 4, SENSITIVE AREAS INFORMATION MAP FOLIO PAGE# SITECQNTAINS SUE ABUTS YES NO YES NO COMMENTS • Wetlands ___ [il 0 00 Wetland# Wetland Class __ 2_..___~Dralnage Basin -------- Sub Basin 50'.)S CQEE}( Critical Basin? [I] [El • Streams ____ 0 0 ~ 0 Stream Class __ F'----- ' I 00-year Floodplain _0 Stream Name la_O g • Erosion Hazard __ 0 0 ___ 0 0 • Landslide Hazard _0 0_0 G1 • Seismic Hazard __ 0 ~--0 0 • Coal Mine Hazard __ 0 g __ o 0 • Other known SA's _0 G'.I_O [J ::rf2.1 I?;;, 1]) SOOS Cl2E'E)(_ Class I or 2 Stream or Class I Wetland within one mile downstream of project site/ _Y.,_E=.,..S,_,, __ _ soos c.eE:Ex:. FEMA FIRM number· ________________ In FEMA Floodplain/ (I] @' Soils Mapped · ' A.9 8, Aa c.. Map# WEB Best available Topographical Map ~f::i~l....;SL-kLdlu.D,<J.M<....,,,,, _____________ _ S. SITE DESCRIPTION MATCHES T.I.R. DESCRIPTION! J}jE "s,rr" Is MADE UP OF l Pk2CEJ s WID::i OFF s,n Of2.A) i\lM E. fAC.1 LI I'(. THE. NOr2..Ttl\S'et,.,l LM68Z LDT IS 1.JY ACQ.ES W ID± A S'.[Q.£2s::M f's:WO WElJ &iO 601 "-lb :n-h2DJb rl :n-tE ~'"12. OF Tl:::l:E ~"-l TB E WE$[, SD.70:I l'\)\)0 8's'ST '.Po'2:D DN s. OUT5.J OE :n±£ IAJl?n..A:,Jo t\J'n16 ills{) Pezv100s 6 e.A01 Wh woe~, Ei t u?J. , I THI:: S l::16Wa? SDl2D::tB}2}.J l 0:C I 5 , 83 AcQ.Es. t W ·IS AkHDS1 DJOl?:ELY A:J.,TBZJ:P BY P12--EV\O\JSW e;ieAQ1 ~b :B1Z.-... b,.\01.J.E CF '"TI-1:E betn::?11, X-:i WotZX_ A9Pe:2'#:S etZ-o.Jf l;D(c;epr :f1))2.. '11-l E t-,lc coe"-l£e Nt;;'{T :JD J]-h::: SI£:B/rfv1. -::IllE Cftsilli ~~E IS. \J/1]::I: IN A coµ$I'Q.L)m 01\.l hQJi'A I\\.OUb 13:t:E PQ.0B2..u up;, PAGE 1 6, EXISTING SITE FEATURES unr,-,'apped Sensitive Areas: OJ[Ltt oF CO,.l<.112UCJ)O/\I &:e£A c:gA, h,)6f,E SHOWS '.BPE:: I~ CAD -A:02£2n?S 1].) BE: A Ct:\:Js1.J1,,18...,/wen.(?) Soils types seen and evidence of soil movement, slides, slumps, erosion, or deposition: ------ LDT 5 Of P12..£VIOUS 612.t'r('X/'F(LL woe1(, ' Ground Cover: W8],M(Q Vfb. (O'TIDr-JlAY:c:QS '31.ACY P:E)z.eY, 01 12..T ' Existing Utilities (hydrants, signs, poles, etc.) shown on site plan? NO Df2.A7r-.JA:6£ I MP r2oJ?M 0\lTS . :P1 P\:c.S. C.UL\.l Ele-TS h-l aT StID,A. l W I ; Wildlife and habitats: SctJb Si r? DS Water Wells: 1--lDt\,\£ 5~ Work started on site? _ . ...i::,,LU, _____________________ _ Closed depression >5000foet1 ? [!] Iii' Steep slopes? [!] g ___________ _ 7, DRAINAGE Drainage complaint records 5eE" ~ 6L "l Proposal will add >SOOOft' of new impervious surface? (I] [l!J Approximate Area ______ _ Proposal will collect and concentrate surface and storm water runoff from an upland and site drainage area of over 5000 ft'? (I] [l!J Approximate Area ______ _ Upland Draina~e Basin (draining directly onto site): Wt'sJ /1.,J Ab£, 6,,o\i\l,S QW[D Sin::; f)2.o JJ\ '1]:H:~· W '2:<;r ;..,..s_w .'i\ t-JD .N W . A P, PE (cl.LR.TS. f)2oH we,r k}..)D Ot]J.-EJS ltJT]) WJ2D.A"}J0 On-site Drainage: THE. t-,JCf2TH:: I or D\2-m t-,l S 1D gJ)2.,f£kt::'.\ 0 N S1TE TD NS coe..tJe2,,, ::JJ:\S: 6017[)-\-I OT DQ..fs:iw,s, 17) c.B'S o~ !;;AST SIDE" CK LO[ Downstream Drainage (minimum I /4 mile distance): :::rJt:t::: ~ Pl,ru) S t-..Jce.-lli :D:IE E?s'S:C fluT7) 'SC:os ce~ !:s. D:E-:G&tS® t l.J lEVR J.... Tl--i£ CB'S U 'l.8..-'< P\2!9t:-J :10 OVTJ..£T kOWl::, ~(B~~s~~~)~ ;~cP~~P=i= JO' \....ltt-J(a '.?(2.-1;2in0J~ S>T'J2©rM k1,..JD 1fJT]) \I\AJW o-\?a,..)µ81 of Si2zz CJ2,.e::B'L. SOOS ~ :PwAlS /r,.,lTD B.of, ~ = Drainage Description Matches T.I.R.1 No-C A LL PE-') 2\-:( Ls St\ov,.) t,.., l -ey1so~ 'D.2Al1Jf\b~/J2.QAD9DC Dt1Z-Ct:8:? ,oPSITI: CB'S :eR, .. NaT 1--!/\ffeC) D6Wt-JS.i'1Z~ 0kPP8.:l -DI P'A 0 WL-1 '\Ll ~~- PAGE. 3 8, EXISTING ROAD NETWORK On'.site Roads ¢ ---'------------------------- Adjacent Roads II 81}1 A\/ E SE. ALON 6 w BSISl DE OF NDJ;0)-1 L6t li2,0T}-\ SI Sle;: Ps:u:1,.1b SOOD:\ SIDE DF SQQCH U,t Closest Transit Stop---'----------------------- 8, EST I MATE OF PR.OJ EC T IMPACTS ON SO IL AND WATER 9, ADDITIONAL COMMENTS W1Trl Z.OQ1 Pr-lot o -SEE OLl:?g 1:1APs FQR. PA G £ 4 IO CONSTRUCTION SIGNS WITHIN SOO FEET AND ADJACENT USE I I NUMBER OF PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN PAGE S til King County ODES Parcel Information Report This report was generated: 4/30/2008 2:18:24 PM Parcel Number: 6196600520 a Base Info Parcel Number: 6196600520 Tax Payer: TRAN BRENDA N Property Name: N/A Annexation: Benson Hill (Recent) Jurisdiction: Renton Situs Address: No Address Assigned Zip Code: 98058 postal City 8 Reference Info The Information Included In this report has been compiled by Klno County staff from a veriety of sources and Is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or Implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such Information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, Indirect, Incidental, or conseciuentlal damages Including, but not llmlted to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the Information contained In this report. Any sale of this report or Information on this report is prohiblted except by written permission of King County. Plat Name: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO. 01 Plat Recording Date: N/A Plat Lot: 8 Plat Block: 2 Kroll Page: 605 Thomas Brothers Page: 686 1/4•S•T•R: NW-33-23-5 Lot Area: 75,794 SqFt. (1.74 Acres) a Planning Info Zoning: R-6 Comprehensive Land Use: um Development Condition: N/A Assessor's Open Space: N/A Commercial Use: N/A Number of Units: N/A Appraised Land Value: 2007 -$142,000, 2006 -$137,000, 2008 -$156,000 Appraised Improvements Value: 2007 -$0, 2006 -$0, 2008 -$0 a Administrative District Info Community Plan Area: Soos Creek Unincorporated Area Council: N/A School District: Renton School District 403 Fire District: King County Fire Protection District No. 40 (40) Roads MPS Zone: 342 (Fee N/A) Roads Transportation Concurrency Mitigation Zone: 798 Waterfront: No Water System: WATER DISTRICT Water Service Planning Area: N/A Sewer System; No Airport Noise Remedy Program: N/A Council District: 5 Julia Patterson Drainage Basin: Soos Creek: WRIA 9 Police Jurisdiction: King County Police Precinct: 3 Police District: F3 Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: .N Forest Production District: N Rural Forest Focus Area: N Page 1 of 2 Transfer Development Rights Type: N/A Transfer Development Rights Status: N/A Transfer Development Rights Permit Number: N/A a Inspection Area Info Building Inspection Area: 5-4 Clearing Inspection Area: Richelle Rose Code Enforcement Inspection Area: Bill Turner ESA Inspection Area: Kathy Newborn Grading Inspection Area: Ramon Locsin Land Use Inspection Area: Mike Melns a Sensitive/Critical Area Info Sensitive Areas Notice(s) on Title: None Sensitive Historic Site: None Bald Eagle Data: Bald Eagle Flag: N/A Aquatic Areas Buffer: N Basin Condition: Medium Flow Control Area: N/ A Water Quality: N/A Critical Aquifer Recharge Area: None Area of Potential Wetland Influence: N Shoreline Management Master Program Designation: None Page 2 of 2 soc tQ King County Assessor information for parcel number 6196600520 Taxpayer name Mailing address TRAN BRENDA N 12055 SE 178TH ST RENTON WA 98058 Parcel number 6196600520 Tax Account number 619660052009 Levy code ______ <1250 ----·----...... _ Jurisdiction RENTON Page I of2 _P_re-"s'-'e_nt'-'u'-'s-'-e ___ _cvccacc.cccan=t(,Slngle-famil}')_ _A~p~p_ra_is_e_d _va_l_ue __ $156,000 Address(es) at this parcel None ~gal descri2..::tio;::;n"-------------------------- NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRS DIV# 1 LESS S 90 FT OF W 150 FT Sales historx ,~~,, = jc=]...__I ~---'---""· II~] -~-.·-.1~,,~ .. 02-27-2006 $115,000 TRAN BRENDAN LEIGHTON FRANK M+MARJORIE M 2_1_8§_954 20060227002064 Statutory None Warranty Deed 10-12-1998 $0 LEIGHTON MARJORIE M LEIGHTON 165_8250 199812242158 Quit Claim Partial I~ FRANK M Deed love,aff,gft Parcel descri2..::ti:::con"----------------------------- Property name -·-· --·----·. ----·--··-··-·---···------- Property R -RESIDENTIAL !YPe Present Vacant(Single- _l:l~". _____ family)-·-·---- Lot area 75,794 sq. ft. (1.74 ·----··-----·· ...... acres) ........... . Taxable value histo Plat NORTHWESTERN GARDEN name TRACTS DIV NO. 01 Plat 2 block Plat lot 8 Q-S-T-NW-33-23-5 R 2008 TAXABLE NONE OR UNKNOWN $156,000 (land) $156,000 (land) 2007 + $.Q {Improvements} $156,000 (total) + $.Q (improvements) $156,000 (total) TAXABLE NONE OR UNKNOWN $142.000 (land) $142.000 (land) + $.Q {improvements) + $_Q (improvements) Water _system. Sewer system Access Street surface · $142,000 (total) $142,000 (total), 2006 TAXABLE NONE OR UNKNOWN $137.000 (land) $137.ooo (land) I + $0 (improvements) + $0 (improvements) ! $137,000 ((otal) __ J137,9..Q.QJ~~j Related resources King County Assessor: Submila_r.e_qUl!l!t-10..c.<!rr.e..clinf<!rmaticm_iruhis_r_ep_Q(t King County Assessor: eRm~r..oR.!Ull'-Bep_or:t_ (PDF format requires Acrobat) King County Assessor: QYllJ:leLS.e.ctiQn Man (PDF format requires Acrobat) King County GIS: e£Qper:t)'...informati1m£,;Q. WATER DISTRICT ... ------·--------·· -·---·--··"·--·-· NONE OR UNKNOWN PUBLIC PAVED ~ King County DOES Parcel Information Report This report was generated: 4/30/2008 2:20:07 PM Parcel Number: 6196600540 a Base Info Parcel Number: 6196600540 Tax Payer: WILSON ED Property Name: N/A Annexation: Benson Hill (Recent) Jurisdiction: Renton Situs Address: No Address Assigned· Zip Code: 98058 Postal City El Reference Info The information Included In this report has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and Is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or Implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such Information. King County shall not be Hable for any general, spec/al, Indirect, Incidental, or consequential damages Including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the Information contained In this report. Any sate of this report or Information on this report Is prohibited except by written permission of King County. Plat Name: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO. 01 Plat Recording Date: N/ A Plat Lot: 9 Plat Block: 2 Kroll Page: 605 Thomas Brothers Page: 686 1/4-5-T-R: NW-33-23-5 Lot Area: 36,035 SqFt. (0.83 Acres) 8 Planning Info zoning: R-6 Comprehensive Land Use: um Development Condition: N/A Assessor's Open Space: N/A Commercial Use: N/A Number of Units: N/A Appraised Land Value: 2007 -$156,000, 2006 -$150,000, 2008 -$171,000 Appraised Improvements Value: 2007 -$0, 2006 -$0, 2008 -$0 :a Administrative District Info Community Plan Area: Soos Creek Unincorporated Area Council: N/A School District: Renton School District 403 Fire District: King County Fire Protection District No. 40 (40) Roads MPS Zone: 342 (Fee N/A) Roads Transportation Concurrency Mitigation Zone: 798 Waterfront: No Water System: WATER DISTRICT Water Service Planning Area: N/A Sewer System: No Airport Noise Remedy Program: N/A Council District: 5 Julia Patterson Drainage Basin: Soos Creek: WRIA 9 Police Jurisdiction: King County Police Precinct: 3 Police District: F3 Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Forest Production District: N Rural Forest Focus Area: N Page 1 of 2 Transfer Development Rights Type: N/ A Transfer Development Rights Status: N/A Transfer Development Rights Permit Number: N/~ ::i::! Inspection Area Info Building Inspection Area: 5-4 Clearing Inspection Area: Richelle Rose Code Enforcement Inspection Area: Bill Turner ESA Inspection Area: Kathy Newborn Grading Inspection Area; Ramon Locsin Land Use Inspection Area: Mike Melns @ Sensitive/Critical Area Info Sensitive Areas Notice(s) on Title: None Sensitive Historic Site: None Bald Eagle Data: Bald Eagle Flag: N/ A Aquatic Areas Buffer: N Basin Condition: Medium Flow Control Area: N/ A Water Quality: N/A Critical Aquifer Recharge Area: None Area of Potential Wetland Influence: N Shoreline Management Master Program Designation: None Page 2 of 2 soc · Page I of2 tQ King County Assessor information for parcel number 6196600540 Taxpayer name WILSON ED Parcel number 6196600540 Mailing address Tax Account number 619660054005 17844 120TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 Levy code _ ~2-~0 ----·---------- Jurisdiction RENTON Present use Vacant(Single-family)_ Appraised value---· $171,000 _Address(es) at this parcel None ~gal descri~_ti_on ____ _ NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRS DIV# 1 LESS W 375 FT Sa~sh~~ __ _ 1 MY~ 11 = 1,L, _1Tor.W_, __J1L1 -~--__J11L ~~CiI!Illflm~-. ~~-J"L ~~~· :~. · ...J. rlc..,_~l)mfl..!l.il.:=~·: 1 ~·...J 0 ,L ~OOEIEil'=!:,-·~ 09-09-1993 $0 WILSON WILSON 1339042 199310281403 Quit Claim Settlement EDWARD GEORGE Deed CHARLES E+SHARON P ----------------------------------·----------·- Parcel descri~tion Property name Property R -RESIDENTIAL _type-----·--_____ -------------· ____ ·---·------ Present Vacant(Single- use _________ . family) Plat name Plat block NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO. 01 2 Plat lot 9 Water sys_te_~ Sewer ,,system_ Access WATER DISTRICT NONE OR UNKNOWN PUBLIC Lot area 36,035 sq. ft. (0.83 Q-S-T-NW-33-23-5 R Street PAVED surface _ acres) -------------··------·-~-·· ·--------- Taxable value histol)'. . ! 'im}l@ [ilD~ 11 ~--l~?iiiwJ:@@1i§w1w:, J 2008 TAXABLE NONE OR UNKNOWN $171,000 (land) $171,000 (land) ' + SP (improvements) + $0 (improvements) $171,000 (total) $171,000 (total) 2007 TAXABLE NONE OR UNKNOWN $156,000 (land) $156.000 (land) + $Q (improvements) + $Q (Improvements) $156,000 (total) $156,000 (total) 2006 TAXABLE NONE OR UNKNOWN $150,000 (land) $150.000 (land) + S.O (improvements) + $.{) (improvements) $150,000 (total) $150,000 (total) Related resources King County Assessor: S.Ybmit.<Ufilluee_t_t,;,__i;_or.re.ctlnf_or_matic:,nJnJhivep_o.rt King County Assessor: eReaU~r_oper:ty_Rep_o,:t_ (PDF format requires Acrobat) King County Assessor: Quar:ter_Section_Map (PDF format requires Acrobat) King County GIS: erop_11.rty_information_l'AQ_ King County GIS: Dlstricts..amtO.e.'leJQpme_ntJ;:_Qnditiims_Repor:t (a detailed report about the location of this property) King County DOES: Ponnit Applications Report (for unincorporated areas only) t11 King County DOES Permit Information Report This report was generated: 4/30/2008 2:21:00 PM The information Included In this report has been compiled by King County start from a variety of sources and Is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such Information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, Indirect, Incidental, or consequential damages Including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the Information contained In this report. Any sale of this report or Information on this report is prohibited except by written permission of King County. Parcel Number: This page is displaying multiple parcels L08S0021 : PRE-SP , PENDING WILSON TRAN SHORT PLAT : A07PF018 : PREAPP·F . COMPLETE' 6196600520 TRAN BRENDA & WILSON EDWARD 212912006 • 6196600520 TRAN BRENDA 11/9/2007 i L05SA411 ; SENSDESG i CANCELED · SESN AREA DESIGNATION i 6196600520 'LEIGHTON FRANK & MARJORIE 9/1/2005 ,--·-----------(-. ·-,-·----·-·---· -~·-I I C9000661 ! G·VIOLAT ; CLOSED i ~::f ING VIOLAT]ON GB 9 • t 6196600540 , WILSON, ED ' 12/21/1989 ; Pe7m'its:_-4· -~ Visibi~-p;:~eiS_-:·-2 =·.:_T~ta"1?~rc""e1;: ·2·~---=~--~-~---~-~----~ . -· ........ ,_, ___ .. _,-_·· ··_ -·-.. .J Page 1 of 1 -=~ --=:::- :: ~ t---r-, - t--6-:'~-.... 1 ·1--·~··---....."4--.-.....i I--.-'-"'~,, I( ~ ------- ,,: .......,........-l J·~----~ ......... ~........,,_.:;;:_j ! 1--........... -=.....1 ll' .':';' .. TRACTS ... ~.~ ... NO =-...:::::..-=.~==- :-=.=-.:::..---:-~ :::::::=--· ... -· •• I I /I 1 l •t \ \ • I ~.if'\ . . NORTHWEST RN GARDEN CTS DIV NO. e ;: NW 33-23-05 ./ 1---NI ··- ,l ,.,.. I • lo it-- 0 r- .... .... 0 "' .... .,. .... 11ta0 ,,.., 1 -0010 30 FT, RO. ESMT, 0 "' .... N "'--/ ·-..., Lot "1" ··-0082 U.).L. O.) Lot "2" ~ 448881 1.03 AC 0480 ~ .., .., "' "' ::;-~ .. ___ .; __ !'I "' ·-°"' KC. L S91L0026 sor:f?J9 s9" A. ,a. ~ ~ ~ 7 206 150 8 .,_ 0521 0 0\ 135001 150 0521 I 9 I I 150 211501 I 0541 435691 1.00 AC 0481 75 ·-05'2 I I '°"" I 0542 75 'f,.cS~ '\'?,9o0 9'609 631. ll 630 .75 75 ·-05&3 105751 0543 75 63_Q .3~ 435691 0482 75 ...... .... 105751 0544 75 "*° 0620 480.75 61-..., LAND: 2406lt BUFFER: 164201 SASA:_ 58821 __________ _ TOT: 463631 0483 218.94 255.75 ., .... ""'° 255,_3_i _____________ ..,_ -------.. ------660."31 s-00 -sO: r- ~ 00382040 r-ID ID ID I ID 0 0 ..... -"f ~ 2 cmo .,. .,. .... 3 .... 0 .... -3:" 4 OQJI) 1 9? ID 1; I~ ID 0 .,. .... 5 6 .1'4 7 L.z J. KEN DY 10551 105491 --DOIIO DOIIO 360351 0540 0 M 0 M '.\.. ~· '\/?; \/OL 73-5 0020 105501 0040 ADDITON 105481 105471 87 501 nnAn E 0030 599.85 0050 0060 7'i -DOIIO ... 30:1; 0 ~ ~ ~ I .... "' I 0 z ,.,. IID 0 0 N \ \ ..... "' <S> U' ·,s, 'tr, \ \ \ 3295021 GIS 7.56 9025 ,mos 9010 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ' 410461 9070 \ ' 30 ..... "' KCSP 275002 7505210540 LOTB 138 .,_ 0 °1• LOT A r- .,. "' ,,ao 96601 r- 0199 11A "' oo •cn 383511 0200 \ \ \ \ \ \ 1/l ..... U' \~ ,., ':,. 0 t'\ "' Soil Map-King County Area, Washington 0 35 70 140 -------=======---------------=============:::iFeet 0 150 300 600 900 l.50\ Natural Resources "i:F Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 2 .0 National Cooperative Soil Survey 4/30/2008 Page 1 of3 Soll Map-King County Area, Washington Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol AgB AgC Totals for Area of Interest (AOI) Natural Resources Conservation Service King County Area, Washington (WA633) Map Unit Name Acres In AOI Aldeiwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes Aldeiwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes Web Soil Survey 2.0 National Cooperative Soll Survey Percent of AOI 1.1 11.5 12.6 8.9% 91.1% 100.0% 4/30/2006 Page 3 of 3 Nr 00 0 (X) ....... CJ) ""Co :I: 0 0~ ~ 0 0 8 l N)> Co o ....... 0, "'CJ "'CJ "'Tl Io 0 ....i. -i ()) 0 I I L08S0021 071 .jpg ",z~·· L08S0021 076.jpg L08S0021 072.jpg ' 2 A" L08S0021 077.jpg "3A" L08S0021 073.jpg L08S0021 078.jpg "3A" L08S0021 074.jpg L08S0021 075.j pg A07PF018 ZONING • 'Tralla . I Schoclo/Schaal F- N_Urt.i Growlh -Line ~T-,ohlpU- S.fa .-.;QSUNES ~SEQ.JNES "1lWPUNES N - ;,;,;w*"---~Way C]Pscoll E:JPwtca o a1ea Za*1; .. ~10-~0MDUpor10..,.. --·.-...i.OMDUpor35..,.. =F-FGN M·Ynall RA-2.5 ·Rini,.,._ cne DU por 5..,.. 1111W RA-6-Rlnl,.,._OMDUporS..,.. -AA-10-Rlnl,.,._.,..DU,-10..,.. UR· Urt.l R1Nrw..,,. DU,-5..,.. R-1 ·.__.....OM DU por-. R-4 ---4 DU por-. 1W. Ra*lonla, e DU por-. IW-~8DUpor-. R-12---12DU,--. -R-11 • --11 DU por-. C!\11 R-Z4 • --:MDU por-. ~R.·RaoidonlW.41DUpor-. NB • NaldltuloOGd -CB. Cclrmu,Ry-- RB • Raglo,a l!t.airaa 0 -Olllca ·-- 0 500 1CXJII 1500 Felt ~ 1~1500- Iii KatgCounty ,,,. __ ..... _ ... __ .., _eo.,_. __________ .. ----o..,_.-.. .......-.. .............. ,,,........, ... ... _...,,,......,._, __ ..,. .... _. =.-.=.·..::...c-.::.:::-.:=:.-....................................... ,._ __ .. ____ .. _ .............. Nfl .... d ... ...,.~ .... _ .. __ .., __ .,_ eo.,_.. Plat dD: Nov 19, 2007: llddllo001\a01IQINII_~ l I 1nJ,...,.1x.~:U"J11JW.i..wi.::.:i..1 I ~i::,...i,:__-~, 0 i i :;::: * L 'm1:ifi11111:1 ::-: .... A07PF018 ARTERIALS PRIN~ AL CTOR OR /\/- ff/ w-- CJ Parms CJ atiea c~ ;· 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 "- 1"=3333- Ii KmgCaunty ,rn:!!!!ii!!!i~:m:::ii::i;~~~t: ·:::::: __ ...... _.,, ___ _ \H ::...-::."':... .. ..:-.:.-:::.!=.. 'jj e:..::-·--... -....-"'!0'9 Pkll <ID: No,, 19, 211117: llddao00111d11\G1811o!_~ A07PF018 HYDRO/GEO BIid e.v--(WllfW) ...... ,, '~Nltwartc ca-. N -it•" ~~ ,' '/' u ~ SAO W.cland (1998) '2::'J SAO i...- llB SAO Coal -ISJSAO- E:I SAO En>olori ;:;:;:W-- -WI.RD DralnllJe ~ o ~ illlld &/:::: and Roaot -(WOFW) IOOFoator- 1320 Foat FEM.\ 0,,.. Sedlarla FEM.\ Flaodway CJ A:MA 100,yr. ~ ocai. 0 500 1000 , ... ,500_ 1500 Fell ti KingCounty ,,,. _______ ...,....., ~°"'""' ___ ....,., __ ........... d-.--~°"'""'-.. . _ ............................. .. ......,_.......,_,_.,w. .... _., --~c...,.-..... -... .,, -----·--~ ...... -...... -.... _ _...._ .. ___ ., .. _ OOMIIMdon .. ..., Nft------~ .... _ .. ,,__., __ .,~ c...,.. L08S0021 001 .jpg L08S0021 002 .Jpg L08S0021 003 .Jpg L08S0021 006 .Jpg L08S0021 007 .jpg L08S0021 008 .Jpg L08S0021 011 .jpg L08S0021 012 .jpg L08S0021 013 .jpg L08S0021 016 .jpg L08S0021 017 .jpg L08S0021 018.jpg L08S0021 021 .Jpg L08S0021 022 .Jpg L08S0021 023 .Jpg L08S0021 026 .jpg L08S0021 027 .jpg L08S0021 028.Jpg L08S0021 031 .jpg L08S0021 032 .jpg L08S0021 033.Jpg L08S0021 004 .jpg L08S0 021 009.jpg L08S0021 014.jpg L08S0021 019.jpg ! ""'. t .• -'I'' "'.' .• ..r, ' ~ •·· I, • . q • • E. . ~ ... i' ,.<) .. _· -~ ~-lif ... _. ~ ·1 -~ -,;,. • •'Jd! . • I .... ' r(' •• ,r,-•' ~· , . . _.-., .-.. . .-.11 .. ' .' ~-.... ,I)~., .• ·':-. ··--· .i L08S0021 024 .jpg L08S0021 029 .jpg L08S0021 034 .Jpg L08S0021 005.Jpg L08S0021 010 .jpg L08S0021 015 .jpg L08S0021 020 .jpg L08S0021 025 .jpg L08S0021 030 .jpg L08S0021 035.jpg L08S0021 036 .Jpg L08S0021 037.Jpg L08S0021 038 .jpg ~- •\.~-•, 1 ..: '~; l'i: .• ; ., ": .. ·t;;:~ ,• ......... Lelj. ..... ·~· .... ' •.1 'I"' ·~ • ._;. L08S0021 041 .jpg L08S0021 042 .jpg L08S0021 043 .jpg L08S0021 046 .Jpg L08S0021 047.jpg L08S0021 048.jpg L08S0021 051 .jpg L08S0021 052 .jpg L08S0021 053.jpg I 7:-.~~.~-;~ .. ~ ~' .. · .. ~; . L08S0021 056 .Jpg L08S0021 057 .jpg L08S0021 058 .jpg L08S0021 061 .jpg L08S0021 062 .jpg L08S0021 063 .jpg L08S0021 066.jpg L08S0021 067.jpg L08S0021 068 .jpg ~1rv~ SOJnt A-r " '2.A" L08S0021 039 .jpg L08S0021 044 .jpg L08S0021 049 .jpg L08S0021 054 .jpg L08S0021 059.jpg L08S0021 064.jpg L08S0021 069.jpg .. 1..A'' L08S0021 040.jpg L08S0021 045 .jpg L08S0021 050.jpg L08S0021 055 .jpg p -~ L08S0021 060 .jpg L08S0021 065.jpg L08S0021 070 .jpg .. '2. A" "' )> Oo o-....i 0, "'O "'O .,, Io 0~ -i CX) 0 0 ~ ;n "-> )> ~~ Oo -< 0 -· C/) C') 0, ~ 0 ""O ~ en 'Tl 0 <0 r <~ 0 CX) ~ TO BB COMPLBTl!D BY APPLICAlllT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY (i} King County State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 1TY 206-296-7217 Purpose of the checklist !I The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW Chapter 43.21 C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for the applicants This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations such as zoning, shoreline and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. K.C. D.D.E.S. TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT A. BACKGROUND. I. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Wilson 8-Lot Shott Plat 2. Names of Applicant: Ed Wilson and Nahn Busse/le, husband and wife, Brenda Tran 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owners/Applicant: Owners~Applicant: Agent: 4. Date checklist prepared: February 28, 2008 5. Agency requesting checklist: Ed Wilson and Nahn Busse/le 12029 SE 175" Street Renton, WA 98058 Brenda Tran 12029 SE 175" Street Renton, WA 98058 PK Enterprises 23035 SE 265'1 Street Maple Valley, WA 98038 (206) 227.7445 Contact: Mr. Phillip Kitzes EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY King County Depattment of Development and Environmental Setvices, Land Use Setvice Division 6. Proposed project timing or schedule (include phasing, if applicable): Upon appl/cation being deemed complete: Checklist Review: 1-3 months Lend Use Review/Heering: 6-8 months Engineering Review/Permitting: 4-6 .months Plat Construction: 2-3 months Home construction is expected to begin in the Summer of 2009 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time. TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. • Level 1 Downstream Analysis prepared by Preferred Engineers, LLC, • Critical Areas Determination Report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. • Addendum (Critical Areas Determination Report) prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. • Report of Geotechnica/ Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers. Inc. 9. Do you know of pending applications for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None are known. I 0. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposals, if known. • Preliminary/Final Short Plat Review • SEPA Review • Final Engineering Review (County and Utility District) • Right-of-Way Agreements/Utility Easements (Bonneville Power and others) • NPDES Permit (storm water) • Corp of Engineers Permit (possible) • Forest Practice Permit (possible) 11. Give a complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in the checklist which ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is a 8-Lot short subdivision located on a 2.57-acre site. The current zoning is R-6; thus, there is a potential for 15 Jots/residences allowed on the property. A majority of the property is in sensitive areas (a wetland and stream) and their associated buffers which reduces the amount of buildab/e land on the properties. The minimum lot size is 3,600 square feet (40' x 907. Sufficient area is provided for recreation on-site, while the proposed storm water pond will be located off-site (easement required-same ownership). Direct access will come from 111!' Avenue SE (2 lots) and SE 180th Street (6 lots)- frontage improvements on both roadways is required. Water (12-inch main) and sewer (minimum 8-inch main) will be extended to the project with approvals from Soos Creek (purveyor). 12. Location of the proposal. Please give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your project, including street address, if any. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, please provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Please provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if possible. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to the checklist. (Indicate if maps or plans have been submitted as part of a permit application). TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGBHCY USB ONLY The properties are vacant and there is no address availabla. Again, ona property (Tran) is accassibla from 11Ei" Avenue SE and Iha Assessor's Parcel Number is 619660-0520. The second property (Wilson and Busse/la) is served from SE 1Bd" Street and the Assessor's Parcel Number is 619660-0540. Both properties are located within the Northwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington. (Plaasa sea enclosed vicinity map and legal dascriptions.) B. ENVIRONMENT AL ELEMENTS. 1. Earth. a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat, rolling. hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other ______ _ b. What is the steepest slope on the site ( approximate percent of slope): The site generally slopes in a nottheasterly direction with the steepest slope on site being an isolated area with 10-15 perr:ent downward gradient slope. c. What general types of soil are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, please specify and note any prime farmland. The soils onsite consist of Alde,wood Gravelly Sandy Loam {AgB and AgC) and Seattle Muck (Sk) so/ls according to the National Resources Conservation Service Survey. (Plaasa see Report of Geotechnical lnvastigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no known surface indications of unstable soils on, or In the immediate vicinity of the proposed site location. (Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) e. Describe the purposes, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading will be limited to the construction of the proposed road and access tract, lots, water, sewer, other utilities, recreation areas, and the proposed detention fadlity. There will be approximately 3,000 cubic yards of cut and fill within this project. The project will attempt to balance the amount of cut and fill, so that no additional impott or expott of material should be necessary. If any impott or expott of material necessary for this project it will be approved at TO BB COMPLBTBD'BY APPLICANT final engineering and obtained from or deposited to a County approved site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion could occur during clearing and grading operations associated with this project. To minimize the impacts of the project, appropriate erosion control measures will be reviewed and approved by the County prior to construct/on activity associated with this project. (Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious . surfaces after construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The total lot area is roughly 111,829 square feet. The area within the public road to be constructed is 2,550 square feet-off-site (within existing right-of-way). With approximately 33,678 square feet in the lots and assuming a maximum 55% impervious surface per lot (Code), there is a total of 18,523 square feet additional impervious surface. Thus, the total new impervious surface area is 21,073 square feet, or 19 percent of the entire site. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction, various measures are expected to be used to control erosion. These methods include construction during the dry season, . the use of silt fences and hay bails, and revegetation of disturbed areas. Specific temporary erosion and sediment control measures will be reviewed and approved by the County prior to construction. (Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) 2. AIR. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke, greenhouse gases) during construction, and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Temporary emmissions (i.e. dust, vehicle related, etc.) from equipment will occur during the construction phase of this project. Upon completion, there will be additional emmisssions from the residences (fireplaces) and residents (automotive, etc.). (Please see enclosed worksheet for green house gases provided by the County.) b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor which may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. BVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT other than the existing residences and vehicular movements along SE 18d1' Street and 11Ef' Avenue SE, there are none to our knowledge. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts, if any: Construction equipment will comply with applicable air quality regulations, as prescribed by the County, State and Federal regulations. Dust emissions will be controlled during site construction by the use of best management practices, including periodic watering of disturbed areas. The project will not rely upon wood burning fireplaces as the primary source of heat for the new homes. All new homes will use natural gas and/or electricity to provide heat, reducing emissions caused by wood burning fires. 3. WATER. a. Surface: I) Is there any surface water on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, associated wetland)? If yes, describe type, provide names, and, if known, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. On-site, there is an existing wetland (Wetland AB) and stream (seasonal tributary) on. the project site. Also, there are several wetlands and streams off-site of this property--including a portion of Big Soos Creek. (For a complete listing of the surface water bodies, please see report prepared by Ecological Land Services, lnc.-- includes location and type.) 2) Will the project require any work over or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The entire development is within 200 feet of these water bodies; thus, construction activity will occur within 200 feet of said waters. It may be necessary to extend water (12-inch) and sewer (8-inch minimum) through portions of the buffers to serve the development-both on-and off-site. (Please see enclosed water and sewer analysis from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District.) In addition, it may be necessary to extend other utilities within these same sensitive areas. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate source of fill materials. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT At this time, there is no proposed filling or dredging being proposed to construct the development. However, there may be a need for dredging and/or filling based on the design of Soos Creek Water and Utility District for water and sewer extensions onto the project site end/or from adjecent properties. If required, the source of fill would be manufactured on-site with native soils. 4) Will surface water withdrawals or diversions be required by the proposal? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a I 00-year floodplain? Note location on the site plan, if any. Not to our knowledge. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: I) Will ground water be withdrawn or recharged? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste water material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): I) Describe the source of runoff and storm water and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will the water flow into other waters? If so, please describe. EVALUATION POR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Storm water runoff from road improvements and residences will be collected via a series of connected pipes to be ultimately discharged into an off-site water quality/detention facility. This facility would be for water quality purposes only. Once treated, the water will be discharged at the lowest natural point, to the existing stream channel-Big Soos Creek. (Please see Drainage Report and Conceptual Drainage Plan prepared by Preferred Engineering, LLC). 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. The proposal includes a water quality treatment component to the pond that will filter out contaminants prior to entering ground and/or surface waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: All development and engineering requirements imposed by the County to control the impacts to the hydrology of the area will be pelformed by the proponent. These Include design of the stormwater facilities pursuant to the 2005 KCSWDM. 4. PLANTS. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ...2QL deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: cottonwood ...2QL evergreen tree: fu:, cedar, pine, other: ...2QL shrubs: ...2QL grass ...2QL pasture crop or grain ...2QL wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other: salmonberry water plants: water lily, eelgrass, mil foil, other other types of vegetation (For a complete list of wet soil/water flora, please see report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Vegetation for the road improvements and residences will be removed. In addition, there may be the need to remove vegetation EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT with the wetland/stream buffers for utilities requiring a mitigation plan. c. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on near the site. None, to our knowledge. d. List proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The development will have a park area that will be planted according to an approved landscape plan prepared during the final engineering phase. In doing so, the developer will be compliant with the existing codes and regulations required by the County with respect to preservance or enhancement of existing vegetation on the site. 5. ANIMALS. a. Circle (underline) any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or. are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ____ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: rodents Fish: bass, salmon, trout, shellfish, other: ----- b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None are proposed at this time •. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES. a. What kinds of energy ( electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and/or natural gas wt/I be used to meet the project's energy needs for light and heat. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY UBE ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List any other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Consttvction of the new homes will meet or exceed the necessary energy requirements of the Northwest Energy Code, the 2005 International Bui/ding Code, and those additlonally adopted by the County. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. a. Are there any environmental health hazards, exposure to toxic chemicals, including risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. I . Describe Special Emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are proposed at this time. b. Noise. I. What type of noise exists in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing vehicular traffic along SE 1adh Street and 11B'h Avenue SE. 2. What types of levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a Jong-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term Impacts would result from the use of construct/on equipment during site development. Construction would occur primarily during the daylight hours, and In compliance with all EVALUATION POR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT applicable codes. Heavy equipment, hand tools, and the transpotting of construdion equipment generate construdion noise. At 200 feet from the construdion, Leq would be approximately the following: Activity Clearing Excavation Foundations Building Construdlon Finishing Lea fin decibels I 71-72 59-77 65 60-72 62-77 Long-term impacts would be those associated with the increase in site users. Additional traffic would be generated by future uses. nie increase in noise would be typical of a single-family residential development of this size and would be considered minima!. Sound levels for various noise sources include: Noise Sources Automobile Starting Closing Car Door Loud Voices Automobile/Truck Traffic Sound Level at . 100 feet(dBA) 50-55 50-55 50 50 3. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction adivities will be performed during normal daytime working hours and compliant with the rules and regulations set fotth by King County. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE. a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Both propetties are vacant and undeveloped. nie following is the known current uses of the adjacent propetties: • North • South • East • West Single-family residences Single-family residences Single-family residence Single-family residences b. Has the site been used for agricultural purposes? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. EVALUATION li'OR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Again, there is a single-family residence with associated outbuildings present on the property. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? . Not applicable. e. What is the current zoning of the site? 771e current zoning is single family resident/a/ R-6 (6 units per acre). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 771e current comprehensive plan designation Is urban resldentiat medium (Single Family, 4-12 units per acre). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program environment designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. As stated previously, there is an existing wetland and stream on this . particular property. (Please see the Critical Areas Detenninatfon Report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.) 1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Based on a household occupancy rate of 2.92 people per s/ngle- faml/y residence, it Is expected that approximately 26 new people will reside in the eight (8) new residences. J. Proposed measures to reduce displacement impacts, if any? None are proposed at this time. k. What are the proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 771e proposed 8-lot short subdivision with single-family residences is consistent with recent and existing development in the area, current zoning, and comprehensive plan designations. 771e project will be compliant with the County Code. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT 9. HOUSING. a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is expected that the project will provide up to 8 new single-family residential units in the middle income level. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 10. AESTHETICS. a. What is the tallest height of ariy proposed structure(s) not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? nie County's zoning code restricts the building heights of single- family residential strudures to 35'. Exterior materials will typically consist of wood or hardy backer type siding with brick, rock, or shingle accents. Specific materials wlll be detennined by the home builder at the time of building pennit and will comply with applicable County regulations. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any? None are proposed at this time. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE. a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? EVALUATION POR AGBNCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Light and/or glare would occur primarily during evening and night time hours and would be limited to any new street lights, house lights, . and minima/ security lighting potentially within the park spaces. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your project? None. d. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 12. RECREATION. a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Maplewood Golf Course and Ron Regis Park are approximately 3.3miles notth of the site. Another golf course, Fairwood Golf and Country Oub, is approximately 2.1 miles to the east of this project. A bit closer, also to the east, is Renton Park along J3dh Avenue SE. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Tne project Is proposing to construct an on-site park area to serve the new residents. A development of this size (8 lots) requires 3,120 square feet (8 times 390 square feet) of recreation space which will be provided on-site. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION. a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on the site. None are known. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 14. TRANSPORTATION. a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any: Both portions of this project are Immediately accessible to SE 18tf' Street and 18tf' Avenue SE, connecting to SE 17d" Street (Petrovitsky}, which connects directly to SR 167 and SR 405. (Please see Preliminary Plat for proposed access point). b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. The nearest public bus access Is at the intersection of 11 ff" Avenue SE and SE 17ff" Street, which Is approximately one-half mile northwest of this project (Bus Route 155). c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Assuming a minimum of 4 parking spaces per household (2-car garage and a 2-car driveway}, there will be at least 32 new parking spaces provided upon completion of this development. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or street, or improvements to any existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). EVALUATION POR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Frontage improvements to both SE 18rl' Street and llll" Avenue SE will likely be required. Will the project use or occur in the immediate vicinity of water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Based on the ITE Manual, there will be approximately 80 net new tips per day generated by this project. Peak volumes would most likely occur during typical rush hour times of 7:00 -9:00 AM and 4:00 -6:00 PM and would add approximately 8 net new AM peak and PM peak hour trips. g. What are proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The applicant will be responsible for appropriate traffic mitigation fees, which will offset some of the impacts of the subdivision. Other mitigation includes the construction of new roads to serve the project. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES. a. Would the project result in an increase need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes. There would be a minima/ increased need for fire and police protection due to an additional 8 new lots in the area. Also, there will be a minimal impact on the present school system. b. What are proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public servi'ces, if any: Property taxes, building permits and school impact mitigation fees generated from these residences are expected to mitigate impacts incurred from this development. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO Bl! COMPLl!Tl!D BY APPLI,CANT 17. UTILITIES. a. Circle (underline) utilities currently available at the site: electricity. natural gas. water, refuse service. telephone, sanitary sewer. septic system, other: cable television. b. Describe the utilities which are proposed for the project. the utility providing the service. and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity: Gas: Water: Refuse: Telephone: Sewer: Cable: Puget Sound Energy Puget Sound Energy Soos Creek Water District Waste Management Qwest Communications Soos Creek Sewer District Comcast Connectfon(s) to the above mentioned utilities wiff be negotiated with the individual purveyor during the building permit and construction phases of this project. There may also be a need for a right-of-way permit(s) to gain access to the property at construction. There may also be a need to extend an 8-inch or greater fine (water and/or sewer) that wiff be determined at final engineering approval by the utility purveyor. C. SIGNATURE. The above answers are true to the best of my knowledge. understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Agent for the Applicant: ----------- Date Submitted: --------- !!VALUATION POR AGENCY US!! ONLY WILSON-TRAN 8-LOT SHORT PLAT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (619660-0520) LOT 8, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUN"IY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE SOUTH 90 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET THEREOF. (619660-0540) LOT 9, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUN"IY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE WEST 375 FEET. MapQuest: Maps, Addresses, Business Directory & Satellite Photos --- 17844 120th Ave Se Renton WA 98058-6648 us Notes: Only text visible within note field will print. I r • . save,:1ta~ St:ind maps,·ary<j•directions.· Jo,rourmocile,phone: Tti'i1t1No:wl 'o .. i r ,., ~-;:/\·.:/>,,! ,;:.: ,p cill~~!n!,J,!,!;· ~ ·)'.:~. :t'?' ' •• 0 • y: • 1St'f:- All dahts reserved. Use Subtect to Llcense/Coovriaht Page I of I This map Is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and Its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. http://www.mapquest.com/maps/print.adp?mapdata=p5kqyoo6yZK6LfzObzPBTCoEK3raj ... 2/28/2008 Section I: Buildings Education ........................................... . Food Sales .................................... : .... . Food Service ...................................... . Health Care In tlent ......................... . Health Care Out tlent ...................... . Lod In .............................................. . Retail Other Than Mall ...................... . Office .................................................. . Public Assembl ................................. . Public Order and Safe ..................... . Rell lous Worshl ............................. .. Service ............................................... . Warehouse and Stora e .................... . Other ........................................... , ...... . Vacant ................................................ . Section II: Pavement ......................... . Pavement. ........................................... . Version 1. 7 12/26/07 Emissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Square Feet (In thousands of Embodied 98 33 54 41 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 Total Project Emissions: Feet MTC02e Ener 357 681 475 646 1,541 1,994 1,938 737 777 577 723 733 899 339 599 352 1,278 162 127500 139995! Sources: 1'1''11 Residential Commercial Definition of Bulldinn T=s Type (Residential) or Prtnclpal Activity Commerclall Oescrlntlon Unless otherwise specified, this Includes both attached and detached Slnnle-Familv Home .................................. buildlnos Multl-Familv Unit In Larne Build!= ........... Anartments In bulldlnns with more than 5 units Multl-Familv Unit in Small Bulldlnn ........... Anartments In buildlnn with 2-4 units Mobile Home ............................................. Buildings used for academic or technical classroom instruction, such as elementary, middle, or high schools, and classroom buildings on college or university campuses. Buildings on education campuses for which the main use is not classroom are Included in the category relating to their use. For exampte, administration buildings are part of ·office," dormitories are Education .................................................. "Lodninn," and libraries are "Public Assemblv." Food Sales ............................................... Bulldinns used for retail or wholesale of food. Buildings used for preparation and sale of food and beverages f~r Food Service ............................................ consumclion. Health Care hmatlent ................................ Buildlnos used as dlannostic and treatment facilities for in n::1tient care. Buildings used as diagnostic and treatment facilities for outpatient care. Docto(s or dentist's office are Included here If they use any type of diagnostic Health Care Out""tient ............................. medical =uinment Iii thev do not, thev are cat=orized as an office bulldlnn\. Buildings used to offer multiple accommodations for short-term or long-term Lodninn ..................................................... residents, inctudlno skilled nurs[nn and other residential care buildlnns. Retail tOther Than Mall\ ............................ Buildincis used for the sale and disclav of aoods other than food. Buildings used for general office space, professional office, or administrative offices. Doctor's or dent1St's office are included here if they do not use any type of diagnostic medical equipment (if they do, they are categorized as an Office ........................................................ outoalient health care buildlnn\. Buildings In which people gather for soclal or recreational activities, whether in Public Assemblv ....................................... nrivate or non-nrivate rneetinn halls. Public Order and Safetv ........................... Bulldl""'s used for the oreservation of law and order or oublic safetv. Buildings In which people gather for religious activities, {such as chapels, Rellnlous Worshin .................................... churches, moiu,ues, svnannnues, and temoles). Buildlngs In which some type of service is provided, other than food service or Service ...................................................... retail sales of ooods Buildings used to store goods, manufactured products, merchandise, raw Warehouse and Storaae .......................... materials, or nersonal beloncinas tsuch as self-storaae\. Buildings that are Industrial or agricultural with some retail space; buildings having several different commercial activities that, together, comprise 50 percent or more of the floorspace, but whose largest single activity Is agricultural, industrial/ manufacturing, or residential; and all other Other ......................................................... miscellaneous buildlnos that do not flt Into anv other cateaorv. Buildings In which more floorspace was vacant than was used for any single commercial activity at the time of Interview. Therefore, a vacant building may Vacant ...................................................... have some occunled floorsnace. 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.ela.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqft-measure.hbnl Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS), Description of CBECS Building Types http://www.ela.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/pba99/bldgtypes.htm1 Average GWP (lbs C02elsq ft): v.ncou-. Low Rise ........ ._ Aver1ge Matel'ials in • ~-square foo home =· ....... M dllta in black tmt Res.ioentiol floorsoaoe IJel' UM F!=p11ce per budding Average GWP (lbs C02ellq ft): Vancouver. Low Riso Building A.llef"a99 Materials in a 2.272-square foot $Ingle family home A~~ .,..;,!tj,~.., :-s:r~ Embodied Emissions WcwtshNt Section I: ........ l.lfe ajiin" reiated -Life span ltllatfKI embodli,d # thousand embodied GHG GHG missions {UTC02&'! Typi, (~ o, Pnnclpal Activity sq feet/ unit rt'ris$lcln3 (MTC02 thousand square feet)· See Ccmmert:ial o, unit calculations In table below Heme..-··········-··· 2 .5.1 98 39 ~amt, Unit in Larg,e __ Bullclln9___,,.,.-",.. 0.85 33 39 :::..~-~.~.~.:::::::::! ~:~I -!r ~ Ectuc.tlorl-~;~.~-~-...... . ......... J ill" I 99tr::::=== 39 ............................... I •• I ·-"T___ "' :"E":········ ,~1: ··E E Rmll fett.Thsn Offlc:e ................. . ~:~1 1·=1 : 14.8 573 39 --"""' 0.-... 14.2 550 39 15.5 600 39 w, 10.1 391 39 1=--·-....... ·-·-·· .. ····-.. ····· €.5 252 39 16.9 ~ 39 L~ _____ .: ________ . ___ .::_:::=:::: 21.9 848 39 14.1 546 39 Sec:t1on D: Pawment.. ... _ I All Types o1 Psvement. •.. -"°"""" ... -Ro<n ,,_.,.Wds " 7.8 19.1 0.0 2269.0 3206.0 0.0 8.0 King County, ONRP. Contact: Matt Kuharic, matt.Jwharic@ldogeounty.gov 2001 Resiaanlial Energy c~ Survey \Natm.i A~e. 200\J Square footage~ and cooiparisoos hltp:/lww#.ela.doe.90_Y/emeufrer;:ahqft~l.fn!..htmt 27.8 EIA. 2003 Commercial Bullctlngs E.nerJY Consumption Survey (Nattonal Aver&ga. 2003) Ml -,,, :Cb~ {I ,., Table CJ. Consumption and GlllSS Enen;,y Intensity for Sum of Major Fuels tor Non-Mall Bulldings. 2003 hltp:/f,N#w.ela.doe.govfemeu/c:becs/cbecs2003ldotalled _ tables_ 20031200J.set9/2003excel/c3....t, -·~ A1l'lena AsHmoly Evaluatlon Tool v2.~ Vani::ouwir Low Rise Builcling Assembly AVS9 GWP (kg) I*' squan, meter http://Www.athenasml.ca/lDolslecoCalcutatorfldeii:.html Lbs I*' kg 220 5quani f8d per squaie meter 10.76 Buldlng5 Energy Date Book: T.3 T)'PleaL'A.vorf99 Housetu:,ld Matsrials lJ$ed In 1he Construction of a 2.2n-Square-Foot Single-Family Home, 2000 http://bulldingsdatabcren.doe.govnid-vi-bee*. table&Tablel0..2036&!-xls Sea 8l$O: NAHB, 2004 Housing Facts, Figures snd Tri. Feb. 2004. p. 7. En,erl:l)· lnfc,rmet,Q!", ).,!<1li(!isl,stia1\:Ho;.r;.J,ig ( hMt1~tJ1ct,:;; n-:;;.:, Ap!lel".C:> B. 0..<liat"f ,;i ti'!~ 0..iT"J. 41 ~. !!p;'.-'f':?-~!l.dc't.!.()' .;.-f~b!eor,wmp-.!¢rt!1,~J<!erit ai:r <'i ~"C!-~/ -w ... Roob 5.7 21.3 T~ Total Embodied ""'''"'"" --(IITC021 6050.0 3103.0 1MTC02e .............. "' ,o.o 88.0 38.7 Pawmant Eml9&lons Foctors MTC02a/lhouurn:I $t!Uffl' ffft Qf asphJlt or concntte p.a1H1ment Embodlod GHG Emllaions Buiklinr,s ~o fseebekJwJ WorlmbtVt; BackDmund Information Embodied GHG emissions are emissions that are aeated through the extraction, processlng, transportation. constructk>n and dlsposal of building materials as well as emissions created through landscape disturbance (by both soil disturbance and changes in above ground biomass). Estimating emboc:Ued GHG emissions is new field of anatysis: the estimates are rapidly improving and becoming more industve of au elements of construdion and development The estimate included ln this worksheet Is calculated using average values for the main construction materials that are used to cmato a typical famUy home. In 2004, the National Association of Home Builders calculated the average materials that are used In a typlcal 2,272 square foot single-family household. The quantity of materials used iS then multiplied by the average GHG emissions associated with the life.cycle GHG emlssions for each materta1. This estimate ls a rough and conservative estimate; the actual embodied emissions for a project are l!kefy to be higher. For example, at this stage, due to a lack of comprehensive data. the estimate does not lndude Important factors such as landscape disturbance or the emissions associated with the Interior components of a building (such as furniture). King County reatlzes that the calcuLations for embodied emissions In this woiuheet are rough. For example, the emissions associated with building 1.000 square feet of a residentlal buDdlng wfD not be the same as 1,000 square feet of a commercial buDdlng. However, discussions with the construction community Indicate that while there are signtflcant differences between the different types of structures. this method of estimation Is reasonable: It will be Improved as more data become available. Addltlonally. If more spec:lftc Information about the Protect Is known, King County recommends two onUne embodied emissions caleulators that can be used to obtain a more taUorecl estimata for embodied emissions: www.buildcarbonneutral org and www athenasmi ca/tools/ecoCalcu!ator/. Pavem9nt Four recent life cycle assessments of the environmental Impacts of roads form the basis for the per unit embodied emissions of pavement. Each study Is constructed in slighUy different ways: however, the aggregate results of the reports represent a reasonable estimate of the GHG emissions that are created from the manufacture of paving materials, oonstructlon related emissions, and maintenance of the pavument over Its expected life cycle. For specifics, see the worksheet SD&clal Sectton: Eattmatjpg the Embodhpd Emissions for Pavement Four recent 6fe cycle assessments of the environmental Impacts of roads form the basis for the per unit embodied emissions of pavement. Each study Is constructed in slight!y different ways; howewr, the aggregate results of the reports represent a reasonable estimatB of the GHG errasslons that are created from the manufacture of paving materials, construction related emissions, and maintenance of the pavement over Its expected life cycle. The results of the studies· are presented In different units and measures; considerable effort was undertaken to be able to compare the results of the studies in a reasonable way. For more details about the below methodology, comact mafl.kuharfc@klngcoumy.gov. The four studies, Mell (2001), Park (2003), Stripple (2001) and Treolar(2001) produced total GHG emlssions of 4-341 MTC02e per thousand square feet of finished paving (for similar asphalt and concrete based pavements). This estimate does not lndudlng downstream maintenance and repair of the highway. The BYerage (for eD concrete and asphalt pa'offl"l8nts in the studies, assuming each study gets one da1a point) Is -17 MTC02e/'lhousand squarg feet Three of the studies attempted to thoroughly account for the emissions associated with long tenn maintenance (40 years) of the roads. Stripple (2001), Park et al. (2003) and Treotar(2001) report 17, 81, and 68 MTC02e/th0Usand square feet. respectlw!y, after accounting for maintenance of the roads. Based on the above dlscusslon, King County makes the conservative estimate that 50 MTC02eilhousand square feet of pavement (over the development's life cycle) wm be used as the embodied emission factor for pavement until better esUma.tes can be obtained. This Is roughly equivafent to 3,500 MTC02e per lane mlJe of road (assuming the lane is 13 feet wide). It Is Important to no1e that these studies estimate the embodied emissions for roads. Paving that does not need to stand up to the rigors of heavy use (such as partcing lots or driveways) would likely use less materials and hence have lower embodied emissklns. Sm,JW; Mell, J. A Life Cycle Perspective on Concrete and Asphalt Roadways: Embodied Primary Energy and Global Wanning Potential. 2006. Available: httn/MWW cementca/cement osf/eee9ec7bbd63Q1268S2Mf:£4QQ52107b/6ec 79cJc8aeQ3a782852572b90061 b9 14/SFILE/ATTKQWE3{athena%2Qreport%2Qfeb,%202%202Q07.pdf Park. K, Hwang, Y., Seo, S., M.ASCE. and Seo, H., "Ouantitattve Assessment of Environmental Impacts on Life Cycle of Highways; Journal of Construction Engineering and Management • Vol 129, January/February 2003, pp 25-31, {DOI: 10.1061/{ASCE)0733-9364{2003)129:1(25)). Stripple, H. Life Cycie Assessment of Road. A Pilot Study for Inventory Analysis. Second Revised Edition. tvL Swedish Envirorvnental Research Institute Ltd. 2001. AvallabMt: httD:/fwww.M.§8/rapporterfpdf/B121QE.pdf Treloar, G., L0\18, P.E.D., and Crawford, R.H. Hybrid Life-Cycle Inventory for Road Construction and Use. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. P. 43-49. January/February 2004. cne emissions vvoni.sneet Energy Floorspace MTCEpe consumption per Carbon per Building thousand MTC02eper Average Lifespan Energy Type (Residential) or Principal Activit building per year Coefficient for MTC02e per (thousand square feet per thousand square Building life Related MTC02e <Commercial (million Btu Buildinas buildina oer vear sauare feet -·· feet"""f..-0'" Sn•n emissions ,.,..r unit Si le-FarnilV Horne •.•••.•.•.•••..•.••••..•.••.•. 107.3 0.108 11.61 2.53 4.6 16.8 57.9 672 Mufti-FamilV Unit in Larae Buildina ....... 41.0 0.108 4.44 0.85 5.2 19.2 80.5 357 Muftl..Famiiv Unit In Small Buildina .•..••. 78.1 0.108 8.45 1.39 6.1 22.2 80.5 681 Mobile Horne .......................................... 75.9 0.108 8.21 1.06 7.7 28.4 57.9 475 Education .............................................. 2,125.0 0.124 264.2 25.6 10.3 37.8 62.5 16,526 Food Sales ............................................ 1,110.0 0.124 138.0 5.6 24.6 90.4 62.5 8,632 Food Service •..•....•..•••...•.•......•..•....•..•... 1,436.0 0.124 178.5 5.6 31.9 116.9 62.5 11.168 Health Care I ent ............................ 60,152.0 0.124 7,479.1 241.4 31.0 113.6 62.5 467,794 Health Care tlent .............•........... 985.0 0.124 122.5 10.4 11.8 43.2 62.5 7,660 Lodalna ................................................. 3.578.0 0.124 444.9 35.8 12.4 45.6 62.5 27,826 Retail cOtherlhan Malll ••.•..•................• 720.0 0.124 89.5 9.7 9.2 33.8 62.5 5,599 Office .................................................... 1.376.0 0.124 171.1 14.8 11.6 42.4 62.5 10,701 Public Assemblv .....•.•.....•....•................ 1,338.0 0.124 166.4 14.2 11.7 43.0 62.5 10,405 Public Order and Safjlffl/ .••...•...•.........••.. 1,791.0 0.124 =.1 15.5 14.4 52.7 62.5 13,928 Rellalous Worshio ................................. 440.0 0.124 54.7 10.1 5.4 19.9 62.5 3,422 · Senrlce .................................................. 501.0 0.124 62.3 6.5 9.6 35.1 62.5 3,896 Warehouse and Storan1111 ........................ 764.0 0.124 95.0 16.9 5.6 20.6 62.5 5,942 Other ..................................................... Vacant ..•..•............•.............................•.. Soun:es All data in black text Energy consumption for residential buildings Energy consumption for commercial buildings and Floorspace per building Carbon Coefficient for Buildings Residential floorspace per unit 3,600.0 0.124 447.6 21.9 20.4 294.0 0.124 36.6 14.1 2.6 King County, ONRP. Contact Matt Kuharic, matt.kuharic@klngcounty.gov 2007 Buildings Energy Data Book: 6.1 Quad Definitions and Comparisons (National Average, 2001) Table 6.1.4: Average Annual Carbon Dioxide Emisslons for Various Functions http://buildlngsdatabook.eren.doe.gov/ Data also at http://www.efa.doe.gov/emeu/recs/recs2001_ce/ce1-4c_houslngunits2001.html EIA, 2003 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey{Natlonal Average. 2003) Table C3. Consumption and Gross Energy Intensity for Sum of Major Fuels for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003 http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detai1ed_tables_2003/2003set9/2003excel/c3.xls 74.9 62.5 27,997 9.5 62.5 2.286 Note: Data in plum color is found In both of the above sources (buildings energy data book and commercial buildings energy consumption survey). Bu!ld!ngs Energy Data Book (National avera;e, 2005) Table 3.1. 7. 2005 Carbon Dtox!de Emission Coefficients for Buildings (MMTCE per Quadri!Hon Btu) http:/!bui!dingsdatabook.eere:.energy.govi?ici=view_book_table&TablelD=-2057 Note: Carbon coefficient in the Energy Data book is in MTCE per Quadrillion Btu. To convert to MTC02e per mlllion Btu, this factor was divided by 1000 and mu!tiplied by 44/12. 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2001) Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqft-rneasure.html Lifespan Energy Related MTC02e emissions per thousand sauare feet 266 422 489 448 648 · 1,541 1,994 1,938 737 m 577 723 733 899 339 599 352 1,276 162 average lief span of buildings. estimated by replacement time method Single Famn, Multi-Family Units All Residential Homes In large and Buildings SmaU BulldJnns New Housing Construct!on, 2001 1,273,000 329,000 1 602,000 Existing Housing Stock, 2001 73,700,000 26,500,000 100,200.000 Repiaceme,, (national time: 57.9 80.5 62.5 average. 2001) Note: Slrigie family homes calculation is used fornlobife homes as a best estimate life span. Note: At this time, KC staff could find no reliable data for the average ltfe span of commerdaJ buildings. Therefore, the average life span of residential buildings Is being used until a better approxtmatlon can be ascertained. ~ New Housing Construction, 2001 Quarterty Starts and Completions by Purpose and Oeslgn • US and Regions (Excel) http://www.census.gov/const/quarterly_st.arts_completions_cust.xls See .also: http://www.census.gov/coost/www/newresco_nstlndex.html Existing Housing Stock, 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) 2001 Tables HC1:Houslng Unit Characteristics, MIiiion U.S. Households 2001 Table HC1-4a. Housing Unit Characteristics by Type of Housing Unit, Million U.S. HousehoJds. 2001 Million U.S. Households, 2001 http:/lwww.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/recs2001lhe_pdf/housunits/he1-4a_houslngunits2001.pdf ,,.,.,,~..._., ... uv,, ._.,,_...,~ """''""""'gal Type (Residential) or Principal Activity /Commercial Sinale-FamiJv.Home ...............••••.•............. Multi,.Fjlm,n1 Unit In Larae Buildina ........... Multi-Fam'"' Unit In Small BuDdlnn ..•........ MobUeHome .. ____ .... _ ............. _ .. ___ .. __ --------- Education ............ -... -............................... Food Sates ........................ ,-.................... Food Service ........................................... Health Care I ·ent ........................••..... Health care I n=tient ............................ Lnnnjnn •.....••••••••..•.•••••••....•••••....•........••••• Retail •Other Than Mall}. .. _, ___ .................... Office ................................. -..................... Public AssemblV ...................................... Public Order and Saf~ ........................... Reliaious Worshln .............. , _____ .. _ ............. Service .................................................... Warehouse and Storaae ............•••.•••....... Other ....................................................... Vacant ........................••......•..•................. ~ All data in black text # people/ unit Residential floorspace per unit # employees/!housand square feet vehide related GHG emissions MTC02e/ # people or (metric tonnes year/ # thousand employees/ C02e per thousand # people/ unit or sq feet/ unit thousand person per MTC02e/ square buildinc or bulldln; sauare feet year VMr/ unit feet 2-8 2_53 1_1 4_9 13_7 5_4 1_9 0-85 2_3 4_9 9.5 11.2 1_9 1_39 1.4 4.9 9.5 6_8 2_5 1.06 2_3 4_9 12.2 11.5 30.0 25.6 1.2 4_9 147.8 5.8 5_1 5_5 0.9 4.9 25.2 4.5 10.2 5_5 1.8 4.9 50.2 9.0 455.5 241_4 1.9 4_9 2246.4 9.3 19.3 10.4 1.9 4_9 95.0 9.1 13.6 35.8 0.4 4_9 67.1 1.9 7.8 9.7 0.8 4_9 36.3 3.9 28.2 14.8 1_9 4_9 139.0 9.4 6.9 14_2 0.5 4.9 34.2 2.4 18.6 15.5 1.2 4_9 92.7 6-0 4.2 10.1 0.4 4_9 2Q_8 2.1 5.6 6.5 0.9 4.9 27.6 4.3 9.9 16.9 0.6 4.9 49.0 2.9 16.3 21.9 0.8 4.9 90.0 4.1 2.1 14.1 0.2 4_9 10.5 0.7 King County, DNRP. Contact: Matt Kuharic, matt.kuharic@kingcounty.gov Estimating Household Size for Use in Population Estimates (WA state, 2000 average) Washington State Office of Financial Management Kimpel, T. and Lowe, T. Research Brief No. 47. August 2007 hltp-J/w,N,.ofm.wa.gov/researchbriefs/brief047.pdf Average Building Life Scan 57_9 80.5 80.5 57.9 62.5 62-5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62_5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Note: This analysis combines Multi Unit Structures in both large and small units into one category; the average is used In this case although there is likely a difference 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2001) Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqft·measure.html Life span transportation related GHG emissions (MTC02e/ oer unit 792 766 766 709 9247 1579 3141 140506 5941 4194 2394 6696 2137 5796 1298 1729 3067 5630 657 Coinmercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey commercial energy uses and costs {National Median, 2003) Table 82 Totals and Medians or Floorspace. Number of Workers, and Hours of Operation for Non·Mall Buildings, 2003 http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed_tabtes_2003/2003set1/2003exceUb2.xts Note. Data for# employees/thousand square feet is presen!ed by CBECS as square feet/employee. Life span transportation related GHG emissions (MTC02e/ thousand sq feet 313 904 550 668 361 282 561 562 571 117 247 566 150 374 129 266 181 257 47 In this analysis employees/thousand square feet is calculated by taking the inverse of the CBECS number and multiplying by 1000. vehicle related GHG emissions Estimate calculated as follows (Washington state, 2006}_ 56,531,930,000 2006 Annual WA State Vehicle Miles Traveled Data ...vas daily VMT, Annual VMT was 365*daily VMT. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/mapsdata/tdo/annualmileage.htm 6,395,798 2006 WA state population http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/53000.htmt 8839 vehicle miles per person per year 0.0506 gallon gasoline/mile This is the weighted national average fuel efficiency for all cars and 2 axle, 4 wheel light trucks In 2005. This includes pickup trucks, vans and SUVs. The 0.051 gallons/mile used here is the inverse of the more commonly known term ·miles/per gallon~ (which is 19.75 for these cars and light trucks). Transportation Energy Data Book. 26th Edition. 2006. Chapter 4: Light Vehicles and Characteristics. Calculations based on weighted average MPG efficiency of cars and light trucks. http://cta.oml.gov/data/tedb26/Edi1ion26_Chapter04.pdf Note: This report states that in 2005. 92.3% of all highway VMT were driven by the above described vehicles. http://cta.oml.gov/data/ledb26/Spreadsheets/Table3_04.xls 24.3 lbs C02e/gallon gasoline The CO2 emissions estimates for gasoline and diesel Include the extraction, transport, and refinement of petroleum as well as their combustion. Life-Cycle CO2 Emissions for Various New Vehicles. RE New Northfield. Available: http://renewnorthfield.org/Y,pcontenVuploads/2006/04IC02%20emisslons.pdl Note: This is a conservative estimate of emissions by fuel consumption because diesel fuel, 2205 with a emissions factor of 26.55 lbs C02e/gallon was not estimated. 4.93 lbs/metric tonne vehicle related GHG emissions (metric tonnes C02e per person per year) average lief span of buildings, estimated by replacement time method See Energy Emissions Worksheet for Calculations Commercial floorspace per unit EIA, 2003 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2003} Table CJ. Consumption and Gross Energy Intensity for Sum of Major Fuels for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003 http://wNw.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed_tables_2003/2003set9/2003excel/c3.xls TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGIBNCY USB ONLY ® King County State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist Department of Development and Environ mental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 1TY 206-296-7217 Purpose of the checklist The State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A}, RCW Chapter 43 .21 C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for the applicants This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations such as zoning, shoreline and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. K.C. D.D.E.S. TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT A. BACKGROUND. I. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Wilson 8-Lot Short Plat 2. Names of Applicant: Ed Wilson and Nahn Busse/le, husband and wife, Brenda Tran 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owners/ Applicant: Owners~Appllcant: Agent: 4. Date checklist prepared: February 28, 2008 5. Agency requesting checklist: Ed Wilson and Nahn Busse/le 12029 SE 17&" Street Renton, WA 98058 Brenda Tran 12029 SE 17&" Street Renton, WA 98058 PK Enterprises 2303S SE 26:? Street Maple Valley, WA 98038 (206) 227.744S Contact: Mr. Phillip Kitzes EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, Land Use Service Division 6. Proposed project timing or schedule (include phasing, if applicable): Upon application being deemed complete: Checklist Review: 1-3 months Land Use Review/Hearing: 6-8 months Engineering Review/Permitting: 4-6 months Plat Construction: 2-3 months Home construction is expected to begin in the Summer of 2009 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time. TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT BVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USE ONLY 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. • Level 1 Downstream Analysis prepared by Preferred Engineers, LLC, • Critical Areas Determination Report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. • Addendum (Critical Areas Determination Report) prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. • Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc. 9. Do you know of pending applications for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None are known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposals, if known. • Preliminary/Final Short Plat Review • SEPA Review • Final Engineering Review (County and Utility District) • Right-of-Way Agreements/Utility Easements (Bonneville Power and others) • NPDES Permit (storm water) • Corp of Engineers Permit (possible) • Forest Practice Permit (possible) 11. Give a complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in the checklist which ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is e 8-Lot short subdivision located on a 2.57-acre site. The current zoning is R-6; thus, there is a potential for 15 lots/residences allowed on the property. A majority of the property is in sensitive areas (a wetland and stream) and their associated buffers which reduces the amount of buildab/e land on the properties. The minimum lot size is 3,600 square feet (40' x 90). Sufficient area is provided for recreation on-site, while the proposed storm water pond will be located off-site (easement required-same ownership). Direct access will come from 11Ei" Avenue SE (2 lots) and SE 180th Street (6 lots)- frontage improvements on both roadways is required. Water (12-inch main) and sewer (minimum 8-inch main) will be extended to the project with approvals from Soos Creek (purveyor). 12. Location of the proposal. Please give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your project, including street address, if any. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, please provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Please provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if possible. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to the checklist. (Indicate if maps or plans have been submitted as part of a permit application). TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USB ONLY The properties are vacant and there is no address available. Again, one property (Tran) is accessible from 11ri" Avenue SE and the Assessor's Parcel Number is 619660-0520. The second property (Wilson and Busse/le) is served from SE 18d" Street and the Assessor's Parcel Number is 619660-0540. Both properties are located within the Northwest Quarter of Saction 33, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington. (Please see enclosed vicinity map and legal descriptions.) B. ENVIRONMENT AL ELEMENTS. 1. Earth. a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other ______ _ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent of slope): The site generally slopes in a northeasterly direction with the steepest slope on site being an isolated area with 10-15 perr:ent downward gradient slope. c. What general types of soil are found on the site ( for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, please specify and note any prime fannland. The soils onsite consist of Alde,wood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgB and AgC) and Seattle Muck {Sk) soils according to the National Resources Conservation Service Survey. {Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no known surface indications of unstable soils on, or in the Immediate vidnity of the proposed site location. {Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) e. Describe the purposes, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading will be limited to the construction of the proposed road and access tract, lots, water, sewer, other utilities, recreation areas, and the proposed detention fadlity. There will be approximately 3,000 cubic yards of cut and fill within this project. The project will attempt to balance the amount of cut and fill so that no additional import or export of material should be necessary. If any import or export of material necessary for this project it will be approved at TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT final engineering and obtained from or deposited to a County approved site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion could occur during clearing and grading operations associated with this project. To minimize the Impacts of the project, appropriate erosion control measures will be reviewed and approved by the County prior to construction activity associated with this project. (Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The total lot area is roughly 111,829 square feet. The area within the public road to be constructed is 2,550 square feet-off-site (within existing right-of-way). With approximately 33,678 square feet in the lots and assuming a maximum 55% impervious surface per lot (Code), there is a total of 18,523 square feet additional impervious surface. Thus, the total new impervious surface area is 21,073 square feet, or 19 percent of the entire site. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction, various measures are expected to be used to control erosion. These methods include construction during the dry season, the use of silt fences and hay bails, and revegetation of disturbed areas. Specific temporary erosion and sediment control measures will be reviewed and approved by the County prior to construction. {Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) 2. AIR. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke, greenhouse gases) during construction, and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Temporary emmissions (i.e. dust, vehicle related, etc.) from equipment will occur during the construction phase of this project. Upon completion, there will ba additional emmisssions from the residences (fireplaces) and residents (automotive, etc.). (Please see enclosed worksheet for green house gases provided by the County.) b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor which may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Other than the existing residences and vehicular movements along SE 18d" Street and 11111' Avenue SE, there are none to our knowledge. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts, if any: Construction equipment w/11 comply with applicable air quality regulations, as prescribed by the County, State and Federal regulations. Dust emissions will be controlled during site construction by the use of best management practices, including periodic watering of disturbed areas. The project will not rely upon wood burning fireplaces as the primary source of heat for the new homes. All new homes will use natural gas and/or eledrlclty to provide heat, reducing emissions caused by wood burning fires. 3. WATER. a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, associated wetland)? If yes, describe type, provide names, and, if known, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. On-site, there is an existing wetland (Wetland AB) and stream (seasonal tributary) on. the project site. Also, there are several wetlands and streams off-site of this proparty--including a portion of Big Soos Creak. (For a complete listing of the surface water bodies, please see report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.·· includes location and type.) 2) Will the project require any work over or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The entire development is within 200 feet of these water bodies; thus, construction activity will occur within 200 feat of said waters. It may ba necessary to extend water (12-inch) and sewer (8-inch minimum) through portions of the buffers to serve the development--both on-and off-site. (Please see enclosed water and sewer analysis from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District.) In addition, it may be necessary to extend other utilities within these same sensitive areas. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate source of fill materials. EVALUATION POR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT At this time, there is no proposed filling or dredging being proposed to construct the development. However, there may be a need for dredging and/or filling based on the design of Soos Creek Water and Utility District for water and sewer extensions onto the project site and/or from adjacent properties. If required, the source of fill would be manufactured on-site with native soils. 4) Will surface water withdrawals or diversions be required by the proposal? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a I 00-year floodplain? Note location on the site plan, if any. Not to our knowledge. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: I) Will ground water be withdrawn or recharged? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste water material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): I) Describe the source of runoff and storm water and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will the water flow into other waters? If so, please describe. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Storm water runoff from road improvements and residences will be collected via a series of connected pipes to be ultimately discharged into an off-site water quality/detention facility. This facility would be for water quality purposes only. Once treated, the water will be discharged at the lowest natural point, to the existing stream channel-Big Soos Creek. (Please see Drainage Report and Conceptual Drainage Plan prepared by Prefem:d Engineering, LLC). 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. The proposal includes a water quality treatment component to the pond that will filter out contaminants prior to entering ground and/or surface waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: All development and engineering requirements imposed by the County to control the impacts to the hydrology of the area will be performed by the proponent These include design of the stormwater facilities pursuant to the 2005 KCSWDM. 4. PLANTS. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _M_ deciduous tree: alder. maple, aspen, other: cottonwood _M_ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: _M_ shrubs: _M_ grass _M_ pasture crop or gram _M_ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other: salmonberry water plants: water lily, eelgrass, mil foil, other other types of vegetation (For a complete list of wet soil/water flora, please see report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Vegetation for the road improvements and residences will be removed. In addition, there may be the need to remove vegetation EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT with the wetland/stream buffers for utilities requiring a mitigation plan. c. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on near the site. None, to our knowledge. d. List proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The development will have a park area that will be planted according to an approved landscape plan prepared during the final engineering phase. In doing so, the developer will be compliant with the existing codes and regulations required by the County with respect to preservance or enhancement of existing vegetation on the site. 5. ANIMALS. a. Circle (underline) any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or. are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: -----Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: rodents Fish: bass, salmon, trout, shellfish, other: ____ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None are proposed at this time .. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES. a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. E/ectrlcity and/or natural gas will be used to meet the project's energy needs for fight and heat EVALUATION POR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List any other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Construction of the new homes will meet or exceed the necessary energy requirements of the Northwest Energy Code, the 2005 Intemational Building Code, and those additionally adopted by the County. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. a. Are there any environmental health hazards, exposure io toxic chemicals, including risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. I. Describe Special Emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are proposed at this time. b. Noise. I. What type of noise exists in the area which may affect your project ( for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing vehicular traffic along SE 1Bdh Streat and 11£ih Avenue SE. 2. What types of levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during site development Construction would oa:ur primarily during the daylight hours, and In comp/lance with all EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT applicable codes. Heavy equipment, hand tools, and the transporting of construction equipment generate construction noise. At 200 feet from the construction, Leq would be approximately the following: Activity Clearing Excavation Foundations Building Construction Finishing Lea fin decibels J 71-72 59-77 65 60-72 62-77 Long-term impacts would be those associated with the increase in site users. Additional traffic would be generated by future uses. nie increase in noise would be typical of a single-family residential development of this size and would be considered minimal. Sound levels for various noise sources include: Noise Sources Automobile Starting Closing car Door Loud Voices Automobile/Truck Traffic Sound Level at . 100 feetfdBAJ 50-55 50-55 50 50 3. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction activities will be petformed during normal daytime working hours and compliant with the roles and regulations set forth by King County. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE. a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Both properties are vacant and undeveloped. The following is the known current uses of the adjacent properties: • North • South • East • West Single-family residences Single-family residences Single-family residence Single-family residences b. Has the site been used for agricultural purposes? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. EVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Again, there is a single-family residence with associated outbuildings present on the property. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not applicable. e. What is the current zoning of the site? The current zoning Is single family residential R-6 (6 units per acre). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan designation is urban residentiat medium (Single Family, 4-12 units per acre). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program environment designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. As stated previously, there is an existing wetland and stream on this particular property. (Please see the Critical Areas Determination Report prepared by Ecological L.and Services, Inc.) t. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Based on a household occupancy rate of 2.92 people per single- family residence, it Is expected that approximately 26 new people will reside in the eight (8) new residences. J. Proposed measures to reduce displacement impacts, if any? None are proposed at this time. k. What are the proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed 8-lot short subdivision with single-family residences is consistent with recent and existing development in the area, current zoning, and comprehensive plan designations. The project will be compllant with the County Code. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 9. HOUSING. a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is expected that the project will provide up to 8 new single-family resident/al units in the middle income level b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 10. AESTHETICS. a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s) not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The County's zoning code restricts the bullding heights of single· family residential structures to 35'. Exterior materials will typically consist of wood or hardy backer type siding with brick, rock, or shingle accents. Specific materials w/1/ be determined by the home bu/Ider at the time of building permit and w/1/ comply with applicable County regulations. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any? None are proposed at this time. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE. a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? EVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Light and/or glare would occur primarily during evening and night time hours and would be limited to any new street lights, house lights, . and minimal security lighting potentially within the park spaces. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your project? None. d. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 12. RECREATION. a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Maplewood Golf Course and Ron Regis Park are approximately 3.3mlles north of the site. Another golf course, Fa/twood Golf and Country Club, Is approximately 2.1 miles to the east of this project A bit closer, also to the east, Is Renton Park along 13d" Avenue SE. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The project Is proposing to construct an on-site park area to setve the new residents. A development of this size (8 lots) requires 3,120 square feet (8 times 390 square feet) of recreation space which will be provided on-site. EVALUATION POR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION. a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on the site. None are known. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 14. TRANSPORTATION. a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any: Both portions of this project are immediately accessible to SE 18d" Street and 18d" Avenue SE, connecting to SE 17d" Street (Petrovitsky), which connects directly to SR 167 and SR 405. (Please see Preliminary Plat for proposed access point). b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. The nearest pub/le bus access is at the intersection of 11 d" Avenue SE and SE 17d" Street, which is approximately one-half mile northwest of this project (Bus Route 155). c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Assuming a minimum of 4 parking spaces per household (2-car garage and a 2-car driveway), there will be at least 32 new parking spaces provided upon completion of this development. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or street, or improvements to any existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Frontage Improvements to both SE 18d" Street and 11£11' Avenue SE wlll likely be required. Will the project use or occur in the immediate vicinity of water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Based on the !TE Manua~ there will be approximately 80 net new tips per day generated by this project. Peak volumes would most likely ocr:ur during typical rush hour times of 7:00 -9:00 AM and 4:00 -6:00 PM and would add approximately 8 net new AM peak and PM peak hour trips. g. What are proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The appllcant will be responsible for appropriate traffic mitigation fees, which will offset some of the impacts of the subdivision. Other mitigation includes the construdion of new roads to serve the project. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES. a. Would the project result in an increase need for public services ( for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes. There would be a minima/ increased need for fire and police protection due to an additional 8 new lots In the area. Also, there will be a minima/ lmpad on the present school system. b. What are proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: Property taxes, building permits and school impad mitigation fees generated from these residences are expected to mitigate Impacts incurred from this development EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT 17. UTILITIES. a. Circle (underline) utilities currently available at the site: electricity. natural gas, water. refuse service. telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: cable television. b. Describe the utilities which are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electr1clty: Gas: Water: Refuse: Telephone: sewer: cable: Puget Sound Energy Puget Sound Energy Soos Creek Water District Waste Management Qwest Communications Soos Creek Sewer District Comcast Connectioil{s) to the above mentioned utilities will be negotiated with the individual purveyor during the building pennlt and construction phases of this project. There may also be a need for a right-of-way pennit(s) to gain access to the property at construction. There may also be a need to extend an 8-inch or greater line (water and/or sewer) that will be detennined at final engineering approval by the utility purveyor. C. SIGNATURE. The above answers are true to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Agent for the Applicant: __________ _ Date Submitted: --------- !!VALUATION POR AQBNCY USB ONLY WILSON-TRAN 8-LOT SHORT PLAT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (619660-0520) LOT 8, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DMSION NUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUN'TY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE SOUTH 90 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET THEREOF. (619660-0540) LOT 9, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUN'TY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE WEST 375 FEET. MapQuest: Maps, Addresses, Business Directory & Satellite Photos --- 17844 120th Ave Se Renton WA 98058-6648 us Notes: Only text visible within note field will print. L! ~l;'; ~ [,, All rlahts reserved, Use Sublect to Ucense/Coovriaht save.Ink! ~d maps mlchflJ'.'8dions ,to;your.mol:lileiphone· ~ . . Page I of I This map Is Informational only. No representation Is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. http://www.mapquest.com/maps/print.adp?mapdata=p5kqyoo6yZK6LfzObzPBTCoEK3raj ... 2/28/2008 Section I: Buildings Service ............................................... . Warehouse end Stora e .................... . Other ........................................... , ...... . Vacant ................................................ . Section II: Pavement ........................ .. ~IP~a~ve~m~e~nil:t.:;: .. ;;: ... :;: .. ;;: ... :;: .. ;;: ... :;: .. ;;: ... :;: .. ;;: ... :;: .. :;: ... :;: ... :;: .. :;: ... :;: .. :;: ... : .••••• Emissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Square Feet (in thousands of Embodied 98 33 54 41 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 Feet MTC02e 357 681 475 646 1,541 1,994 1,938 737 777 577 723 733 899 339 599 352 1,278 162 2,550.00-- 117 247 588 150 374 129 266 181 257 47 Total Project Emissions: Version 1. 7 12126107 1275001 139995! Sources: :mm Residential Commercial Definition of Buildinn Tunes Type (Residential) or Principal Activity Commarclall Descrintlon Unless otherwise specified, this includes both attached and detached Sinnle-Familv Home .................................. bulldinns Muill-Famllv Unit In Larne Buiidinn ........... Anartments in bulidlnns wilh more lhan 5 units Mulli-Familv Unil in Small Buildlnn ........... A"""rtments in buildina with 2·4 units Mobile Home ............................................. Buildings used for academic or technical classroom instruction, such as elemenlary, middle, or high schools, and classroom buildings on college or university campuses. Buildings on education campuses for which the main use is not classroom are Included in the category relating to their use. For example, administration buildings are part of "Office," dormitories are Education .................................................. "Lodninn," and libraries are "Public Assemblv." Food Sales ............................................... Buildinns used for retail or wholesale of food. Buildings used for preparation and sale of food and beverages for Food Service ............................................ consumotion. Health Care lnnotlent ................................ Buildlnos used as diaonostic and treatment facilities for inoatlent care. Buildings used as diagnostic and treatment facilities for outpatient care. Doctor's or dentist's office are Included here if they use any type of diagnostic Health Care Out""tient ............................. medical ""Uinment (if lhev do not, thev are catAnorized as an office buiidlnnl. Buildings used to offer multiple accommodations for short-term or long.term Lodaina ..................................................... residents, includlna skllled nursina and other residential care buildlnas. Relail/Other Than Mail\ ............................ Bulldinas used for the sale and disolav of ooods other than food. Buildings used for general office space, professional office, or administrative offices. Doctor's or dentist's office are Included here If they do not use any type of diagnostic medical equipment(~ they do, they are categorized as an Office ........................................................ ou+ ...... tient health care buildin"''. Buildings In which people gather for social or recreational activities, whether in Public Assembiv ....................................... "rivets or non.nrivate meetlnn halls. Public Order and Safetv ........................... Bulldinns used for the nreservation of law and order or nublic safetv. Buildings In which people gather for religious activities, {such as chapels, Rellnlous Worshln .................................... churches, mo=ues, svnaoooues, and temolesl. Buildings in which some type of service is provided, other than food service or Service ...................................................... retail sales of ooods Buildings used to store goods, manufactured products, merchandise, raw Warehouse and Storaoe .......................... materials, or =rsonal belonclnos /such as seif-storaoe\. Buildings that are Industrial or agricultural with some retail space; buildings having several different commercial activities that. together, comprise 50 percent or more of the floorspace, but whose largest single activity is agricultural, Industrial/ manufacturing, or residential; and all other Other ......................................................... miscellaneous buildlnos that do nol fil into anv other cat=orv. Buildings In which more floorspace was vacant than was used for any single commercial activity at the time of Interview. Therefore, a vacant building may Vacant ...................................................... have some occunled floorsn'2ce, 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.ela.doe.govlemeu/recs/sqft-measure.hlml Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS), Description of CBECS Building Types hllp:llwww.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecslpba99/bidgtypes.html Embodied Emisslais Wortsheet Sec:t1on I: Bulldlmn Life span relatod Ufe span related embodied embodied GHG GHG missions {MTC026'] ml$SIOnS (MTC02el thousand 5q1,1&r11 feet)· See unit calculatlons In tat)le below "°""' 98 39 1·-::::'"*~"'"'=--·1 °851 331 "I UUU1-F UnltlnSmd ......... 1.39 54 39 ~~ ............................. ----·· ,.~ 41 39 Edur::stlon .. :... ... .:.. .. ~ ............ :. .• _ ............... J 25.6., 991 I 39 Food$ale$ ................................ 1 6.61 2171 39 Food Snee ......................................... , 5.61 2171 39 ::g::=r:::::=::::~:::::::::=::: 2~~:: 9,!: : ~ ,41-39 RataLOtllerTh#l Mall).... 37( 39 ==:~·::~~~:~~:~::~~.:~::~J ~;~ I.. 51 E R,...,,...,swcirshb:>: ................................. I 10.11 3911 39 Sen,lce ··--·-·-···-··-·--·-·······--··-··-6.5 252 39 w~ n Storsp, ····-······-···-·-· 16.9 654 ____ 39_ O#lef" ·--·-··-.-= ·····---··---·-·· .. .. I -21.9 I ---848["-39 Vacant·····-··-------------·-.. -···--·-' 14.1 j 546) 39 Section D: PawrMt!L-!An Typas al PIIVllma1L ................ . 5') -"""'""' .......... -. ...... w ... -A-.geGWP (lbaC02ftqfl):V~. t.o,,,Rlse ... -...... ~, 7.8 19.1 512 Average Materials In a 2.272-&quar9 foci ~...c....home 0.0 "'9.0 3206.0 26S.O =· 0.0 8.0 27.8 ~· -Al data In black teJCl King County, ONRP. Contact: Matt Kuharic. matt.~kinljlcounty.p Residential floorspace per Unit 2001 Re$ident/al Enorgv Consumptjon Survey (National Average, 2001) Square fool.ago rnaasuremem:i and compansons http:/,-,_,ela,dos.go_vlcmevlrea/sqft-measurl!.html Floorspaee IXl" bi.lildlng EIA.. 2003 commercial Bulldlngs Energy Consumption Survey (National Avoragi,. 2003) Awnge GWP {lbs C02ftq ft): VantlOl./loY. Tat,ie CJ. COnsumption and Gl1lSS Energy lnten!.ity for Sum of t.A3JOf Fuel$ for Non-MaU Buildlngs. 2003 http:l/ww# .• doo.go'lliemeu/dloc:$/etleC:$20C!Jfclota&td_tables_2003.'2003set91200J«cel/c3.s.lt Low Rise Buld!ng Alhena EccCe!ndev Average Materiel$ in a 2.272-square foot single family home ~--e<"«;t,.'.~llti.~ ... :-ir.H Athena Assembly Evaluation Tool v2.3-Vancouver Li;M" Rise Building Assembty AV91'9 GWP (kg) per t,qUllf1I meter http;//www.lllhenasml.cwtools/ocoCalculatorll Lb$ per kg 2.20 Square feet per square meter 1 D. 76 BuDdlng$ Er,sgy Oatll Book.: 7 .3 T ypicaVA"'91"age Household Mattltim Used in the Construaion of• 2.2n-Squere-Foo1. Single-Family Home, 2000 http:l~eren.doa.gov~_booll_~Tablel[),c2036&FJds See lllso: NAHB, 2004 Housing Fat'b, Figures and Trend$. Feb. 2004. p. 7. Ei~ trllc,rr,".Ol~• A-lmii"isl,31!'.;n.'H!1l0fl9 < !1.1r,:u;1ut1ir $ 1-)'.),'.< A;moriO<, B, CoA~ty ci the D.,,--:a ic-g. !.i. ;;..l:l ;',~~.e;!l.::1{1:l.()(·<.-l;).lb/COl\"....m:,tic,n.',1,r~,:ent~.rr-«J ).'>Cl-.p:,r ·--w ... -., 21.3 T°"' T .... Embodled ---(MTC02el 6050.0 3103.0 "m:02e thousand -t.al' ,~, >J.O BM 38.7 Pavvmcot EmlsaiOl\s f:icttM"s 1,1TC02elthoYS.and ~-1Nt d asphalt gr t:onCl'19ffl l)IIWlfl'Wfflt Embodkld GHG Emts,tornt Buildings ~ ,.,..Delow) Worbb91S Backa£PUnd lnfonnation Embodied GHG emissions are emfsslons that are misted through the extraction, processing, transportation, construcllon and dlsposal of building materials as well as emissions created through landscape disturbance (by both soil disturbance and changes In above ground biomass}. Estimating embodied GHG emissions is new field of analySls; uie estimates are rapidly Improving and becoming more inclusive of all elements of construction and development The estimate Included In this worksheet Is calculated using average va!ues for the main construction materials that are used to create a typical family home. In 2004, the National Association of Home Builders calculated the average materials that are used In a typicaJ 2.2n square foot single-family househOld. Tho quantity of materialS used Is then muttiplled by the aYBrage GHG emlsslons associated with the Dfe.cyd.e GHG emissions for each material. This estimate Is a rough and conservative estimate; the actual embodled emissions for a project are likely to be higher. For example. at this stage, due to a lack of compn1hansiw data, the estimate does not lnc::lude Important factors such as landscape disturbance or the emlsslons associated with the lnter1or components of a building (such as furniture}. King County realizes that the calculations for embodied emissions In this wort.sheet are rough. For example, the emissions associated with building 1,000 square feet of a residential building will not be the same as 1,000 square feet of a commercial building. However, discussions with the construction community Indicate that while thera are significant differences between the dtfferent types of structures, this method of estimation IS reasonable: It will be Improved as more data become avallable. AddltlOnally, If more specific information about the project is known, King CoWlty recommends two onllne embodied emissions caleulators that can be used to obtatn a more tauored estimate for embodied emissions: www bulktcarbonneutral grg and WINW'-athenasml caJtools/ecoCalcutator/- Pawmenr Four recent life cycle assessments of the environmental Impacts of roads form the basis for the per unit embodied emissions of pavement. Each study ls constructed in slightly different ways; howeYer, the aggregate results of the reports reprasent a 1'98SOnabla estimate of the GHG emissions that are aeated from the manufacture of paving materials, oonstructlon related emissions. and malntsnanoe of the pavement over Its expected life cycle. For specifics. see the work.sheet Special Section; Estimating the Embodied Emlsalons for Pavement Four recent llfu cycle assessments of the environmental Impacts cf roads fonn the basis for the per unit embodied emissions of pavement Each study is constructed in slightly different ways; however. the aggregate results of the reJX)rts represent a reasonable estimate of the GHG emissions that are created from the manufacture of pa\lfng materials, construction related emissions, and maintenance of the pavement over its expected llfe cycle. The results of the stl.Jdies are presented in different units end measures; considerable effort was undertaken to be able to compare the results of the studies in a reasonable way. For more details about the below methodology, contact mattkuharlo@klngcounty.gov. The four studies. MeU (2001 ), Park (2003), Strlpple (2001) and Treolar (2001) produced total GHG emissions of 4-341 MTC02e per thousand square feet of finished pa...tng (for slmBar asphalt and conc:nrte based pavements). This estimate does not lndudlng downstream maintenance and repair of the highway. The average (for aU concrete and asphalt pavements in the studies, assuming each study gets one data point) Is -17 MTC02e/thousand square feel Three of the studies attempted to thoroughly account for the emissions associated wtth long term maintenance (40 year,) of the roads. Strtpple (2001), Park eta!. (2003) and Treolar(2001} report 17, 81, and 68 MTC02elthousand square feet. respectiwfy, after accounting for rnaintenarce of the roads.. Based on the above discussion, King County makes the conservative estimate that 50 MTC02el!housand square feet of pavement (over the de\lelopmenfs fife cycle) will be used as the embodied emission factor for pavement until better estima1Bs can be obtained. This Is roughly equivalent to 3,500 MTC02e per lane n-.le of road (assuming the lane Is 13 r.et wide). It is Important to note that these studies estimate the embodied emissions for roads. Paving that does not need to stand up to the rigors of heavy use {such as parking lots or drtveways) would Ukely use less matertals and hence have lower embodied emissions. = Mell, J, A Life Cycle Perspecth,e on Concrete and Asphalt Roadways: Embodied Primary Energy and Global Warming Potentlal. 2006. Available: httQ·UV,,,.W cementca/cement.nsfleee9ec7bbd6301268525M£4QQ52107b/68c79dc8ae03a782852572b90061 b9 141SFILE/ATTKQWE31athena%20reoort%2QFeb.%2Q2%2Q2007 odf Park, K, Hwang, Y .• Seo, S., M.ASCE, and Seo, H., "Quantitative Assessment of Enlllronmental Impacts on Life Cyde of Highways," Joumal of Construction Engineering and Management , Vol 129, .lanualy/Februaty 2003, pp 25-31, (DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364{2003)129:1 (25)). Stripple, H. Life Cycle Assessment of Road. A Pilot Study for Inventory Analysis. Second Revised Edition. M. Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd. 2001. Available: htto;Jtww:w M se1raooorterlodf1B1210E odf Trek>ar, G., Love, P .E.O., and Crawford. R.H. Hybrid Life.Cycle Inventory for Road Construction and Use. Journal of Construction Engineer1ng and Management P. 43-49. JanuaryfFebruary 2004. e---· r,,-i--'ons Work-'--- Enefg) Floorspace MTCEper consumption per Cart>on per Building thousand MTC02eper Average Lifespan Energy Type (Resldentlal) or Principal Ac1MtJ bullding per -Coefficient lo, MTC02e per (thousand square feet per thousand square Building Life Related MTC02e (Commercial (million Btu Bulldinas bulldlrv1 ... r ... "r square feet -·r feet ... r""'""r1 S=n emissions rw,,r unit Sinnle-Fam1N Horne ...............•.............. 107.3 0.108 11.61 2.53 4.6 16.8 57.9 an Multl-Familv Unit In Larae Bulldlna •.....• 41.0 0.108 4.44 0.85 5.2 19.2 80.5 357 Muttl-Fami!Y Unit in Small Bulldlna ....... 78.1 0.108 8.45 1.39 6.1 22.2 80.5 661 Mobile Hc:xne .......................................... 75.9 0.108 821 1.06 7.7 28.4 57.9 475 Education .............................................. 2,125.0 0.124 264.2 25.6 10.3 37.8 62.5 16,526 Food Sales ............................................ 1.110.0 0.124 138.0 5.6 24.6 90.4 62.5 8,632 Food Service ......................................... 1.436.0 0.124 178.5 5.6 31.9 116.9 62.5 11,168 Health Care~·-·························· 60.152.0 0.124 7,479.1 241.4 31.0 113.6 62.5 487,794 Health Care tient ......................... 985.0 0.124 122.5 10.4 11.8 43.2 62.5 7,660 Lodalna ................................................. 3,578.0 0.124 444.9 35.8 12.4 45.6 62.5 27.828 Reta II (Other Than MallL. ..................... 720.0 0.124 89.5 9.7 9.2 33.8 82.5 5,599 Office .................................................... 1,376.0 0.124 171.1 14.8 11.6 42.4 62.5 10,701 Public Assem-· ................................... 1.338.0 0.124 166.4 14.2 11.7 43.0 62.5 10,405 Publfc Order and Safl'ml ........................ 1,791.0 0.124 222.7 15.5 14.4 52.7 62.5 13,928 ReliQious w~ ................................. 440.0 0.124 54.7 10.1 5.4 19.9 62.5 3,422 Service .................................................. 501.0 0.124 62.3 6.5 9.6 35.1 62.5 3,896 Warehouse and Stofa.DR ........................ 764.0 0.124 95.0 16.9 5.6 20.6 62.5 5,942 01her ..................................................... Vacant ...............................•................... l!!!!!!:sD All data In black text Energy consumption for residential buildings Energy consumption for commercial buildings and Floorspace per building Carbon Coefficient for Buildings Residential floorspace per unit 3,600.0 0.124· 447.6 21.9 20.4 294.0 0.124 38.6 14.1 2.6 King County, ONRP. Contact Matt Kuharic, matt.kuharic@klngcounty.gov 2007 Bulldlngs Energy Data Book: 6.1 Quad Definitions and Comparisons {National Average, 2001) Table 6.1.4: Average Annual Carbon Dioxide Emissions for Various Functions http://buildlngsdatabook.eren.doe.gov/ Data also at http:/lwww.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/recs2001 _ ce/ce1-4c_ houslngunits2001.html EIA, 2003 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2003) Table C3. Consumption and Gross Energy Intensity for Sum of Major Fuels for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003 http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detai1ed_tables_2003/2003set9/2003excel/c3.xls 74.9 62.5 27.997 9.5 62.5 2.286 Note: Data in plum color is found In both of the above sources (buildings energy data book and commercial buildings energy consumption survey). Bulldlngs Energy Data Book {National average, 2005) Table 3.1.7. 2005 Carbon Dioxide Emission Coefficients for Buildings (MMTCE ::,er Quadrillion Btu) http://bi.1HdingsdataOOOk.. eere .ene11Jy.govnld=viev-1 _book_ table& T ab!e1D= 2057 Note: Carbon coefficient in the Energy Data book is in MTCE per Quadrillion Btu. To convert to MTC02e per mitrion Btu, this factor was divided by 1000 and multiplied by 44i12. 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2001 ) Square footage measurements and comparisons http://v.ww.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqft-measure.html Lifespan Enellll Related MTC02e emissions per thousand sauare feet 266 422 489 448 646 1,541 1.994 1,938 737 777 5n 723 733 899 339 599 352 1,278 182 average lief span of buildings, estimated by replacement time method Single Family Multi-Family Uni!S All Residential Homes In Large and Buildings SmaD Bulldll'IQS New Housing ConslructJon, 2001 1,273,000 329.000 1,602,000 Exls1lng Housing Stock, 2001 73,700,000 26,500,000 100,200,000 Replacemen (national time: 57.9 80.5 62.5 average, 2001) Note: Sirigfe·tari,ily homes calculation Is used for mobll8 hoine5 as a best estimate life span. Note: At this time, KC staff could find no reUable data for the average life span of commercial buildings. Therefore, the average llfe span of resldentlal buildings Is being used until a better approximation can be ascertained. liQl!!W; New Housing Construction, 2001 Quarterly Starts and Completions by Purpose and Design -US and Regions (Excel) http://www.census.gov/constlquarterty_starts_complettons_cust.xls See also: http://www.census.gov!constlwww/newresc0:nstindex.html Existing Housing Stock. 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) 2001 Tables HC1:Housing Unit Characteristics. Million U.S. Households 2001 Table HC1-4a. Housing Unit Characteristics by Type of Housing Unit. MIiiion U.S. Households, 2001 Million U.S. Households, 2001 http:/Jwww.ela.doe.govlemeu/recslrecs2001lhc_pdf/housunltslhc14a_houslngunits2001.pdf ,,,..,,~uu,uaou..,,, ._,..,.,......,,,;a, •WVll\.>ll'l;;;Ql Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial Sinnle-Familv Home .................................. Multi-Familv Unit in La ..... e Build! ........... Multi-Famllv Unit in Small Bulldina ........... Mobile Home ............................................ Education ..................•......•••.................... Food Sales .............................................. Food Se!vice ........................................... Health Care lnrunient ............................... Health Gare O• ""-'ent ............................ L .................................................... Retail /Other Than Mall\ ............................ Office ..................••.•. , .••..........................•. Public Assem= ...................................... Public Order and Safetv ........................... Rellolous Worshlo .................................... Service •...•••.•.......................•................... Warehouse and Storaae .......................... Other ...•.••••........................•.•••••••••........... Vacant .........................•..........•...•............ ~ All data In black text # people/ unit Residential floorspace per unit # employees/thousand square feel vehicle related GHG emissions MTC02e/ # people or (metric tonnes year/ # thousand employees/ C02eper thousand # people/ unit or sq feet/ unit thousand person per MTC02e/ square buildina or builrlinn <uiuare feet -~, VP'llr/ unit feet 2.8 2.53 1.1 4.9 13.7 5.4 1.9 0.85 2.3 4.9 9.5 11.2 1.9 1.39 1.4 4.9 9.5 6.8 2.5 1.08 2.3 4.9 12.2 11.5 30.0 25.6 1.2 4.9 147.8 5.8 5.1 5.6 0.9 4.9 25.2 4.5 10.2 5.6 1.8 4.9 50.2 9.0 455.5 241.4 1.9 4.9 2248.4 9.3 19.3 10.4 1.9 4.9 95.0 9.1 13.6 35.8 0.4 4.9 67.1 1.9 7.8 9.7 0.8 4.9 36.3 3.9 28.2 14.8 1.9 4.9 139.0 9.4 6.9 14.2 0.5 4.9 34.2 2.4 18.8 15.5 1.2 4.9 92.7 6.0 4.2 10.1 0.4 4.9 20.8 2.1 5.6 6.5 0.9 4.9 27.6 4.3 9.9 16.9 0.6 4.9 49.0 2.9 18.3 21.9 0.8 4.9 90.0 4.1 2.1 14.1 0.2 4.9 10.5 0.7 King County, DNRP. Contact: Matt Kuharic, matt.kuharic@kingcounty.gov Estimating Household Size for Use in Population Estimates (WA state, 2000 average) Washington State Office of Financial Management Kimpel, T. and Lowe, T. Research Brief No. 47. August 2007 http://www.ofm. wa .gov/researchbriefs/brief04 7 .pdf Average Building Life Sru1n1 57.9 80.5 80.5 57.9 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Note: This analysis combines Multi Unit Sbuctures in both large and small units into one category; the average is used in this case although there is likely a difference 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2001) Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqft-measure.html Life span transportation related GHG emissions (MTC02e/ ~unit 792 766 766 709 9247 1579 3141 140506 5941 4194 2394 8696 2137 5796 1298 1729 3067 5630 657 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey commercial energy uses and costs {National Median, 2003) Table B2 Totals and Medians of Floorspace. Number of Workers, and Hours of Operation for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003 http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed_tables_2003/2003set1i2003exceL'b2.xls · Note. Data for# employees/thousand square feel is presented by CBECS as square feet/employee. Life span transponaUon related GHG emissions (MTC02e/ thousand sq feet 313 904 550 668 361 282 561 582 571 117 247 588 150 374 129 266 181 257 47 In this analysis employeeS.!thousand square feet is calculated by taking the inverse of the CBECS number and multiplying by 1000. vehicle related GHG emissions Estimate calculated as follows (Washington state, 2006)_ 56,531,930,000 2006 Annual WA State Vehicle Miles Traveled Data was daily VMT. Annual VMT was 365 ... daily VMT. http://www.YJSdot.wa.gov/mapsdataJtdo/annualmileage.htm 6,395,798 2006 WA state population http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/statesl53000.html 8839 vehicle miles per person per year 0.0506 gallon gasoline/mile This is the weighted national average fuel efficiency for all cars and 2 axle, 4 wheel light trucks in 2005. This includes pickup trucks, vans and SUVs. The 0.051 gallons/mile used here is the inverse of the more commonly known term ·miles/per gallon· (which is 19.75 for these cars and light trucks). Transportation Energy Data Book. 26th Edition. 2006. Chapter 4: Light Vehicles and Characteristics. Calculations based on weighted average MPG efficiency of cars and light trucks. http://cta.oml.gov/data/te<lb26/Edition26_Chapter04.pdf Note: This report states that in 2005, 92.3% of all highway VMT were driven by the above described vehicles. http://cta.oml.gov/dataltedb26/Spreadsheets/Table3_04.xls 24.3 lbs C02e/gallon gasoline The CO2 emissions estimates for gasoline and diesel include the extraction. transport, and refinement of petroleum as well as their combustion. Life-Cycle CO2 Emissions for Various New Vehicles. RENew Northfield. Available: http:J/renewnorthfield.org/wpcontent/uploads/2006/04/C02%20emlsslons.pdf Note: This is a conservative estimate of emissions by fuel consumption because diesel fuel, 2205 with a emissions factor of 26.55 lbs C02e/gallon was not estimated. 4.93 lbs/metric tonne vehicie related GHG emissions {metric tonnes C02e per person per year) average lief span of buildings, estimated by replacement time method See Energy Emissions Worksheet for Calculations Commercial floorspace per unit EIA, 2003 Commercial Bulldings Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2003) Table C3. Consumption and Gross Energy Intensity for Sum of Major Fuels for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003 http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed_tables_2003/200~set9/2003excel/c3.xls TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT BVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ® King County State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 1TY 206-296-7217 Purpose of the checklist The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA}, RCW Chapter43.21 C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for the applicants This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checkl_ist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations such as zoning, shoreline and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining ifthere may be significant adverse impacts. K.C. D.D.E.S. TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT A. BACKGROUND. I. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Wilson 8-Lot Short Plat 2. Names of Applicant: Ed Wilson and Nahn Busse/le, husband and wife, Brenda Tran 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owners/Applicant: Owners/,Applicant: Agent: 4. Date checklist prepared: February 28, 2008 5. Agency requesting checklist: Ed Wilson and Nahn Busse/le 12029 SE 171f• Street Renton, WA 98058 Brenda Tran 12029 SE 176• Street Renton, WA 98058 PK Enterprises 23035 SE 26.1'1 Street Maple Valley, WA 98038 (206) 227.7445 Contact: Mr. Phillip Kitzes EVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USB ONLY King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, Land Use Service Division 6. Proposed project timing or schedule (include phasing, if applicable): Upon application being deemed complete: Checklist Review: 1-3 months Land Use Review/Hearing: 6-8 months Engineering Review/Permitting: 4-6 _months Plat Construction: 2-3 months Home construction is expected to begin in the Summer of 2009 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. • Level 1 Downstream Analysis prepared by Preferred Engineers, LLC, • Critical Areas Determination Report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. • Addendum (Critical Areas Determination Report) prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. • Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc. 9. Do you know of pending applications for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None are known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposals, if known. • Preliminary/Final Short Plat Review • SEPA Review • Final Engineering Review (County and Utility District) • Right-of-Way Agreements/Utility Easements (Bonneville Power and others) • NPDES Permit (storm water) • Corp of Engineers Permit (possible) • Forest Practice Permit (possible) 11. Give a complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in the checklist which ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is a 8-Lot short subdivision located on a 2.57-acre site. The current zoning is R-6; thus, there is a potential for 15 lots/residences allowed on the property. A majority of the property is in sensitive areas (a wetland and stream) and their associated buffers which reduces the amount of buildable land on the properties. The minimum lot size is 3,600 square feet (40' x 907. Sufficient area is provided for recreation on-site, while the proposed storm water pond will be located off-site (easement required-same ownership). Direct access will come from 11/f' Avenue SE (2 lots) and SE 180th Street (6 lots)- frontage improvements on both roadways is required. Water (12-inch main) and sewer (minimum 8-inch main) will be extended to the project with approvals from Soos Creek (purveyor). 12. Location of the proposal. Please give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your project, including street address, if any. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, please provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Please provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if possible. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to the checklist. (Indicate if maps or plans have been submitted as part of a permit application). TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY The properties are vacant and there is no address available. Again, one property (Tran) is accessible from 11£i" Avenue SE and the Assessor's Parcel Number is 619660-0520. The second property (Wilson and Busse/le) is served from SE 1ad" Street and the Assessor's Parcel Number is 619660-0540. Both properties are located within the Northwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington. (Please see enclosed vicinity map and legal descriptions.) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS. I. Earth. a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other ______ _ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent of slope): The site generally slopes in a northeasterly direction with the steepest slope on site being an isolated area with 10-15 percent downward gradient slope. c. What general types of soil are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, please specify and note any prime farmland. The soils onsite consist of Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgB and AgC) and Seattle Muck (Sk) so/ls according to the National Resources Conservation Service Survey. {Please see Report cif Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no known surface indications of unstable soils on, or in the immediate vicinity of the proposed site location. {Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) e. Describe the purposes, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading will be limited to the construction of the proposed road and access tract, lots, water, sewer, other utllities, recreation areas, and the proposed detention fadlity. There will be approximately 3,000 cubic yards of cut and fill within this project. The project will attempt to balance the amount of cut and fill, so that no additional import or export of material should be necessary. If any import or export of material necessary for this project it will be approved at TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT final engineering and obtained from or deposited to a County approved site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion could occur during clearing and grading operations associated with this project. To minimize the impacts of the project, appropriate erosion control measures will be reviewed and approved by the County prior to construction activity associated with this project. {Please sea Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious . surfaces after construction ( for example, asphalt or buildings)? The total lot area is roughly 111,829 square feet. The area within the public road to be constructed is 2,550 square feet-off-site (within existing right-of-way). With approximately 33,678 square feet in the lots and assuming a maximum 55% impervious surface per lot (Code), there is a total of 18,523 square feet additional impervious surface. Thus, the total new impervious surface area is 21,073 square feet, or 19 percent of the entire site. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction, various measures are expected to be used to control erosion. These methods include construction during the dry season, . the use of silt fences and hay bails, and revegetation of disturbed areas. Specific temporary erosion and sediment control measures will be reviewed and approved by the County prior to construction. {Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) 2. AIR. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke, greenhouse gases) during construction, and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Temporary emmissions (i.e. dust, vehicle related, etc.) from equipment will occur during the construction phase of this project. Upon completion, there will be additional emmisssions from the residences (fireplaces) and residents (automotive, etc.). (Please see enclosed worksheet for green house gases provided by the County.) b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor which may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Other than the existing residences and vehicular movements along SE 1 Bd" Street and 1111" Avenue SE, there are none to our knowledge. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts, if any: Construction equipment will comply with applicable air quality regulations. as prescribed by Iha County. State and Federal regulations. Dust emissions will be controlled during site construction by the use of best management practices, including periodic watering of disturbed areas. 771e project will not rely upon wood burning fireplaces as the primary sourr:e of heat for the new homes. All new homes will use natural gas and/or electricity to provide heat, reducing emissions caused by wood burning fires. 3. WATER. a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, associated wetland)? If yes, describe type, provide names, and, if known, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. On-site. there is an existing wetland (Wetland AB) and stream (seasonal tributary) on the project site. Also, there are several wetlands and streams off-site of this proparty--including a portion of Big Soos Creak. (For a comp/eta listing of Iha surface water bodies, please sea report prepared by Ecological Land Services, lnc.-- inc/udas location and type.) 2) Will the project require any work over or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The entire development is within 200 feat of these water bodies; thus, construction activity will occur within 200 feat of said waters. It may be necessary to extend water (12-inch) and sawer (8-inch minimum) through portions of the buffers to serve Iha development-both on-and off-site. (Please sea enclosed water and sawer analysis from Soos Creak Water and Sawer District.) In addition, it may be necessary to extend other utilities within these same sensitive areas. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate source of fill materials. BVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USB ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT At this time, there is no proposed filling or dredging being proposed to construct the development. However, there may be a need for dredging and/or filling based on the design of Soos Creek Water and Utility District for water and sewer extensions onto the project site and/or from adjacent properties. If required, the source of fill would be manufactured on-site with native soils. 4) Will surface water withdrawals or diversions be required by the proposal? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a I 00-year floodplain? Note location on the site plan, if any. Not to our knowledge. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn or recharged? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste water material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): I) Describe the source of runoff and storm water and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will the water flow into other waters? If so, please describe. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Storm water runoff from road improvements and residences will be · collected via a series of connected pipes to be ultimately discharged into an off-site water quality/detention facility. This facility would be for water quality purposes only. Once treated, the water will be discharged at the lowest natural point, to the existing stream channe/--Big Soos Creek. (Please see Drainage Report and Conceptual Drainage Plan prepared by Preferred Engineering, LLC). 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. The proposal includes a water quality treatment component to the pond that will filter out contaminants prior to entering ground and/or surface waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: All development and engineering requirements imposed by the County to control the impacts to the hydrology of the area will be performed by the proponent. These include design of the stormwater facilities pursuant to the 2005 KCSWDM. 4. PLANTS. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _M._ deciduous tree: alder. maple, aspen, other: cottonwood _M._ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: _M._ shrubs: _M._ grass _M._ pasture crop or grain _M._ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other: salmonberry water plants: water lily, eelgrass. mil foil, other other types of vegetation (For a complete fist of wet soillwatar flora, please sea report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Vegetation for the road improvements and residences will be removed. In addition, there may be the need to remove vegetation EVALUATION POR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT with the wetland/stream buffers for utilities requiring a mitigation plan. c. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on near the site. None, to our knowledge. d. List proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The development will have a park area that will be planted according to an approved landscape plan prepared during the final engineering phase. In doing so, the developer will be compliant with the existing codes and regulations required by the County with respect to preservance or enhancement of existing vegetation on the site. 5. ANIMALS. a. Circle (underline) any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or. are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ____ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: rodents Fish: bass, salmon, trout, shellfish, other: ----- b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None are proposed at this time •• 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES. a. What kinds of energy ( electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrldty and/or natural gas will be used to meet the project's energy needs for light and heat. EVALUATION l!'OR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List any other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Construction of the new homes will meet or exceed the necessary energy requirements of the Northwest Energy Code, the 2005 International Building Code, and those additionally adopted by the County. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. a. Are there any environmental health hazards, exposure to toxic chemicals, including risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. I . Describe Special Emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are proposed at this time. b. Noise. I. What type of noise exists in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing vehicular traffic along SE 1Bd" Street and 11Efh Avenue SE. 2. What types of levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-tenn impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during site development Construction would occur primarily during the daylight hours, and in compliance with all EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT applicable codes. Heavy equipment, hand tools, and the transporting of construction equipment generate construction noise. At 200 feet from the construction, Leq would be approximately the following: Activity Clearing Excavation Foundations Building Construction Finishing Leq (in decibels/ 71-72 59-77 65 60-72 62-77 Long-term impacts would be those associated with the increase in site users. Additional traffic would be generated by future uses. The increase in noise would be typical of a single-family residential development of this size and would be considered minimal. Sound levels for various noise sourres include: Noise Sources Automobile Starting Closing Car Door Loud Voices Automobile/Truck Traffic Sound Level at 100 feet ldBAJ 50-55 50-55 50 50 3. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction activities will be performed during normal daytime working hours and compliant with the rules and regulations set forth by King County. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE. a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Both properties are vacant and undeveloped. The following is the known current uses of the adjacent properties: • North • South • East • West Single-family residences Single-family residences Single-family residence Single-family residences b. Has the site been used for agricultural purposes? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. KVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Again, there is a single-family residence with associated outbuildings present on the property. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not applicable. e. What is the current zoning of the site? The current zoning is single family residential R·6 (6 units per acre). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The cu"ent comprehensive plan designation is urban residential, medium (Single Family, 4· 12 units per acre). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program environment designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. As stated previouslr, there is an existing wetland and stream on this . particular property. (Please see the Critical Areas Determination Report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.) i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Based on a household occupancy rate of 2.92 people per single· family residence, It is expected that approximately 26 new people will reside in the eight (8) new residences. J. Proposed measures to reduce displacement impacts, if any? None are proposed at this time. k. What are the proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed B·lot short subdivision with single-family residences is consistent with recent and existing development In the area, current zoning, and comprehensive plan designations. The project will be compliant with the County Code. BVALUATION FOR AGBHCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT 9. HOUSING. a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is expected that the project will provide up to 8 new single-family residential units in the middle income level. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 10. AESTHETICS. a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s) not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The County's zoning code restricts the building heights of single- famf/y residential strudures to 35'. Exterior materials will typically consist of wood or hardy backer type siding with brick, rock, or shingle accents. Specific materials wit! be detennined by the home builder at the time of building permit and will comply with applicable County regulations. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any? None are proposed at this time. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE. a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT light and/or glare would ocr::ur primarily during evening and night time hours and would be limited to any new street lights, house lights, . and minimal security lighting potentially within the park spaces. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your project? None. d. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 12. RECREATION. a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Maplewood Golf Course and Ron Regis Park are approximately 3.3miles notth of the site. Another golf course, Fairwood Golf and Country Club, is approximately 2.1 miles to the east of this project A bit closer, also to the east, Is Renton Park along 13d" Avenue SE. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The project is proposing to construct an on-site park area to serve the new residents. A development of this size (8 lots) requires 3,120 square feet (8 times 390 square feet) of recreation space which will be provided on-site. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION. a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on the site. None are known. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 14. TRANSPORTATION. a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any: Both portions of this project are Immediately accessible to SE 18rf" Street and 1 Brf" Avenue SE, connecting to SE 17d" Street (Petrovitsky), which connects directly to SR 167 and SR 40S. (Please see Preliminary Plat for proposed access point). b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. The nearest public bus access Is at the intersection of 11 d" Avenue SE and SE 17d" Street, which Is approximately one-half mile northwest of this project (Bus Route 155). c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Assuming a minimum of 4 parking spaces per household (2-car garage and a 2-car driveway}, there will be at least 32 new parking spaces provided upon completion of this development d. Will the proposal require any new roads or street, or improvements to any existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Frontage improvements to both SE J8d1' Street and J Jd" Avenue SE will likely be required. Will the project use or occur in the immediate vicinity of water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Based on the !TE Manuat there will be approximately 80 net new tips per day generated by this project. Peak volumes would most likely occur during typical rush hour times of 7:00 -9:00 AM and 4:00 -6:00 PM and would add approximately 8 net new AM peak and PM peak hour trips. g. What are proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The applicant will be responsible for appropriate traffic mitigation fees, which will offset some of the impacts of the subdivision. Other mitigation includes the construction of new roads to serve the project. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES. a. Would the project result in an increase need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes. There would be a minima/ increased need for fire and police protection due to an additional 8 new lots in the area. Also, there will be a minimal impact on the present school system. b. What are proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: Property taxes, building petmits and school impact miti!}8tion fees generated from these residences are expected to mitigate impacts incurred from this development. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 17. UTILITIES. a. Circle (underline) utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: cable television. b. Describe the utilities which are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity: Gas: Water: Refuse: Telephone: sewer: cable: Puget Sound Energy Puget Sound Energy Soos Creek Water District Waste Management Qwest Communications Soos Creek Sewer District Comcast Connection( s) to the above mentioned utilities will be negotiated with the individual purveyor during the building permit and construction phases of this project. There may also be a need for a right-of-way permit(s) to gain access to the property at construction. There may also be a need to extend an 8-inch or greater line (water and/or sewer) that will be determined at final engineering approval by the utility purveyor. C. SIGNATURE. The above answers are true to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Agent for the Applicant: __________ _ Date Submitted: --------- EVALUATION FOR AGBNCY UBB ONLY WILSON-TRAN 8-LOT SHORT PLAT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (619660-0520) LOT 8, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE SOUTH 90 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET THEREOF. (61 9660-0540) LOT 9, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE WEST 375 FEET. MapQuest: Maps, Addresses, Business Directory & Satellite Photos --- 17844 120th Ave Se Renton WA 98058-6648 us Notes: Only text visible within note field will print. All riahts reserved, Use Subiect to Ucense/Coovrlaht save.Ink! Send maps. arKhiii'ections ,to;rourmol,ile.phone· :Jhilf'Nowl ' . • ,· I ,.o:11 ''\./ ,. ,, ·<,'·:· . <J-'. Page I of I This map is Informational only. No representation Is made or warranty given as to Its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. http://www.mapquest.com/maps/print.adp?mapdata=p5kqyoo6yZK6LfzObzPBTCoEK3raj ... 2/28/2008 Section I: Buildings Section II: Pavement. ........................ . Pavement. ........................................... . Version 1. 7 12/26/07 Emissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Square Feet (in thousands of Embodied 98 33 54 41 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 0.0 39 2,550.00 Total Project Emissions: Feet MTC02e Ener 357 681 475 646 1,541 1,994 1,938 737 777 577 723 733 899 339 129 599 266 352 181 1,278 257 162 47 127500 139995! Sources; 1111111 Residential Commercial Definition of Bulldina Tvnes Type (Residential) or Principal Activity ·commerclall Descrtallon Unless otherwise specified, this includes both attached and detached Slnale-Famllv Home .................................. buildlnas Multl-Famllv Unit In Larae Buildina ........... Anertments In bulldlnas with more than 5 units Multl-Femilv Unit in Small Buildina ........... Anartments In bulldlnn with 2-4 units Mobile Home ............................................. Buildings used for academic or technical classroom instruction, such as elementary, middle, or high schools, and classroom buildings on college or university campuses. Buildings on education campuses for which the main use is not classroom are Included in the category relating to their use. For example, administration buildings are part of "Office," dormitories are Education .................................................. "Lodaina," and libraries are "Public Assemblv." Food Sales ............................................... Bulldinns used for retail or wholesale of food. Food Service ............................................ Buildings used for preparation and sale of food and beverages f?r consumotion. Health Gare lnnatlent ................................ Buildlnns used as diacinostic and treatment facilities for inru,itient care. Buildlngs used as diagnostic and treatment facilities for outpatient care. Doctor's or dentist's office are Included here if they use any type of diagnostic Health Care Outnatient ............................. medical enulnment /If thev do not, thev are cateaorized as an office bulldlnn\. Buildings used to offer multiple accommodations for shorMerm or long-term Lodnlnn ..................................................... residents, includina skilled nursina and other residential care buildinas. Retail •Other Than Mall\ ............................ Buildinas used for the sale and disclav of aoods other than food. Buildings used for general office space, professional office, or administrative offices. Doctor's or dentist's office are included here if they do not use any type of diagnostic medical equipment (if they do, they are categorized as an Office ........................................................ out"'tient health care buildlnn\ Buildings In which people gather for soclal or recreational activities, whether in Public Assemblv ....................................... arivate or non-nrivate meetina halls. Public Order and Safetv ........................... Bulldinas used for the nreservalion or law and order or oubHc safetv. Buildings in which people gather for religious activities, (such as chapels, Rellalous Worshin .................................... churches, mosnues, svna""',.,ues, and temnles). Buildlngs in which some type of service is provided, other than food service or Service ...................................................... retail sales of coeds Buildlngs used to store goods, manufactured products, merchandise, raw Warehouse and Starace .......................... materials, or cersonal belona inas I such as self-storaae \. Buildings that are Industrial or agricultural with some retail space; buildings having several different commercial actlvlties that, together, comprise 50 percent or more of the floorspace, but whose largest single activity Is agricultural, industrlal/ manufacturing, or residential; and all other Other ......................................................... miscellaneous buildlnas that do not fit into anv other catenorv. Buildings in which more floorspace was vacant than was used for any single commercial activity at the time of Interview. Therefore, a vacant building may Vacant ...................................................... have some occuoled floorS""'Ce. 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.eta.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqft-measure.html Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS), Description of CBECS Building Types http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/pba99/bldgtypes.html Embodied Emissions Wortlheet s.ctkln I: Ao..._ Life span related -Life span related embodied embodied GHG GHQ mission& (UTC02e/l mlsslcra (MTC02 thaussncl square feet)• See1 unit catculll!IO'ls In table below ------~ .. ~ 39 l:a~;-~-~-===:::I ___ !:El El__ e, A......, GWP (Iba C02e/sq ft): Vanc:ouver. LawRtse"'-~~ Average Mmrials In a 2.272-squartl foal """"' lffl:02• -All dstll In black led Reweotial floorspace per unit Floorspace pee-buildlng Average GWf' (lbs C02e/sq ft~ Vancouver, Low Rise Bullding A..,..-age Matenata in 1 2.272-sciuare fool --- t.~89(;\'l'iH!J: ... ;,l:,_e Education. =·-···-... :.::i__ -25.6 I -991 I _ -~ Food Sales·-....................... _______ ...... 1 5.6 I mr---39 Food Senllce ·-······· ............. 1 39 = g::: ............ ~::::~~=:: _ ______: 39 39 Retall-fOther Th-, Md).,=··· Office-········· ---"-... ~:~ I ~1 ;: 15.5 600 39 w, ~----·-·····.. ·····-·-----1~:~ I ;9~[ : 16.9 654 -~ WIIA!lhauso and.,...,...., ...................... .. au. .................................................... . _2j~_[l_ MSj 39 Vacant--··--·--·····-··--······-······ 1,.1 I 5461 39 Section D: Pawment... ·-- jAII Types of Pnement. ..... _ ... -"°""""'"" ...... -. .-w ... ~, 7.8 19.1 o.o 2269.0 3208.0 0.0 ao Kaig Cou-ity, DNRP. Contact Matt Kutwic. matt.kuharic@kingeounty.tp, 2001 R~~vC~$UN9y(NationalAYflf'aqe.2001) ~e footage measure!Tletl1S and~ http-J/www.roia.doo.p-lemeulrecsl$qfr-html 27.8 FIA. 2003 COmmerc:lal Bulldln9$ Energy Consun,ptlarl Slney (National Averege, 2003) ~ Window$ 012 ~&!,,(• 6.6 Table C3. Consumption anti Gr= Energy Intensity tor Sum al Ma,or Fuel& tor Non-Man Buildmg~, 2003 http-JJwww.ei,,.doo.p/"emeu/d>ec::slcboes2003/detailed _ table$_2003.-'2003$crt9/2003e,u;el/c3.J.111 Athel'III FcoC1lnttetnr Athena Assembly Evaluation Tool v2.3-Vancouver Low Rise Building Assembly A-.ge GWf' (kg) per aquan,: mc=ter ht!pj"Jwww~ Lbs per kg 2.20 Squme feet per squar9 metcl" 10.76 8uldlng, FnorvY Data Book: 7.3 TypiealfAvel'alge Household Materi11s USOd In the Construetion ol 1 2.272-~Foot Single-Family Home. 2000 http:f~aren.~_bo::lk_tal)le&Table!0<:2036&tsxfs See 11SO: NAHB, 2004 l-lou$lng Fads. Figures and Trends, Feb. 2004. p. 7, En,w,;y Jntt,rmot,cr, J..•111lil'!i1.!latiiltl.'11111.dng (hM.tcn:rt:::\it~ 1,)';i;:~ ,\µµetl(lc, S. O\wtty Of l~ D.-m. i:.g Ii. ttp:;,~.e;1:1.dc-tJ.t;(.,.-fp,.,b!COtl'.#o~'i,~;i,1e,-,t$.r"'1)het .. p:;f -w ... -., 21.3 ,~ Total Embodied ---(UTC02tw 6000.0 3103.0 'UTC02e ttiousand .... feet' 1~6 30.0 88.0 3a7 Pavomant Emlsllcns Factors MTC02elthouund ~are f .. t of nptull or l:OnCJ1lat paveincmt Embodktd GHG Emllllons BuDdl11Qs !lO ,_ bQ!owJ Worbbfft BackQround Information Embodied GHG emlss!ons are emissions that are aeated through the extraction, processing, transportation.. construction and dlsposal of building materials as well es emlssions created through landscape disturbance (by both soil disturbance and changes ln above ground biomass). EstlmaUng embodied GHG emissions is new field of analysis; the estimates are rapidly improving and becoming more inclusive of all elements of construction end de-.,ment. The estimate Included in this worksheet Is calculated using average values for the main construction materials that are used to cteata a typical family home. In 2004. 1he National Assodation of Home Builders calculated the average materials that are used In a typical 2.272 square foot slngle-famlty household. The quanUty of materials used is then muttiplled by the average GHG emissions associated with the life-cycle GHG emissions for each material. This estimate Is a rough and conservative estimate; the actual embodied emlSsions for a project a,e likely ID be higher. For example, at this slage, due to a laek of comprehensive data, the astlma1e does not Include important fac:tors such as landscape disturbance or the emissions associated with the interior components of a building (such as furniture). King County realizes that the calculations for embodied emissions in this wontsheet are rough. For example, the emissions associated with building 1,000 square feet of a reSidentlal building will not be the same as 1,000 square feet of a commercial building. However, discussions wtth the construction community lndlcate that while there era slgnfflcant dtrferenc::es between the different types of structures. this method of estimation Is reasonable; It will be lmprovad as more data become available. Addltlonally, If more specific Information about the project Is known, King County recommends two onllne embodied emissions calculators that can be used to oblain a mora tailored estimate for embodied emissions: www bufldcart,onneutral org and www athenasmi ca/tools/ecoCalculator/. Pavem&nt Four racent life cycle aaaeasments of the environmental impacts of roads fonn the basis for the per unit embodied emlssklns of pavement. Each study Is constructed In slightly different ways; however, the aggregate results of !he reports represent a reasonabie estimate of the GHG emissions that are created from the manufacture of paving materials, construction related emissions. and maintenance af the pavement over Its expected life cycle. For specifics, see the worksheet Special Section; Estimating the Embodied Emissions for Pavement Four recent life cycle asaessrnents of Iha environmental Impacts of roads fonn the basis for the per unit embodied emissions of pavement. Each study is constructed in slightly different ways; however, the aggregate results of Iha reports represent a reasonable estimate of the GHG emissions that are created from the manufactun, of paving ma1erials, construction related emissions, and maintenance of !he pavement over Its expected life cyde. The results of the studies are presenfBd In different untts and measures: considerable effort was undertaken to be ab&e IO compare the results of the studies In a reasonable Wa'f. For more details about the below methodology, contact matt.kuharic@klngcounty.gov. The four studies, Meil (2001), Park {2003}, Stripple (2001) and Treolar(2001) produced total GHG emlssions of 4-341 MTC02e per thousand square feet of finished paving (for similar asphatt and concrete based pavements). This estimate does not including downstream maintenance and repair of the highway. The average (for all concrete and asphall pavements In the studies, assuming each study gets one data point) ts -17 MTC02e/thouSand square feel Th18e of the sb.Jdies attempted ID thoroughly account for the emissions assodated with long tenn maintenance (40 years) of the roads. Sbipple (2001), Park et at. (2003) and Treolar (2001) report 17, 81, and 68 MTC02e/thousand square feet, respectively, after accounting for maintenance of the roads. Based on the above discussion, King County makes the conservative estimate thal 50 MTC02e/lhousand square feet of pavement (over the developmenfa life cycle) will be used as the embodied emission factor for pavement until better estimates can be oblalned. This ts roughly equivalent to 3,500 MTC02e per &ane mile of road (assuming the lane Is 13 feet wide). II is important to note that these studies estimate the embodied emissions for roads. Paving that does not need IO stand up ID the rigors of heavy use (such as parking lots or drtvewaya) would likety use less materials and hence have lower embodied emfsslons. Sources· Meil, J. A Life Cycle Pempective on Concrete and Asphalt Roadways: Embodied Primary Energy and Global Warming Potential. 2006. Available: http·ffwww cement cafcement.nsffeee9ec7bbd63Q126852fffl:AAP52107bl6ec:79dcilae03a 782852572b90061 b9 14/Sf1LE/AITKO\¥E3fathena%20reoort%20Feb %202%202007 pdf Park, K, Hwang, Y., Seo, S .• M.ASCE, and Seo, H. , "Quantitative Assessment of Environmental Impacts on Life Cycle of Highways," Journal of Conslruction Engineering and Management , Vol 129. Janua,y/FeblUaly 2003, pp 25-31, (DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:1(25)). Stlipple, H. Life Cycle Assessment of Road. A Pilot Study for Inventory Analysis. Second Revised Edition. 1VL Swedish Environmental Research Institute ltd. 2001. Available: http://www.M.se/raooortedpdf/B12l0E Ddf Treloar, G., Low. P.E.O., and Crawford, R.H. Hybrid LJttK;ycle lnwntory for Road Construction and Use. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. P. 43-49. JanuaryfFebruary 2004. cc,~, CC 111"":>!Ull>i .-.-u111,:,.1 Ene,gy Floorspace MTCEper consumption per Carbon per Building thousand MTC02eper Average Lifespan E""fVi Type (Reside-) or Principal ActMty building per year Coefficient for MTC02eper (thousand square feet per thousand square Building Life Related MTC02e (Commercial tm1mon Btu BuUdlnas bulldino DP1 VAar ~uare feet _, feetn,:,,rVM1r S=n emissions n,:,,r unit SI le-Famltv Horne ...........•.................. 107.3 0.108 11.61 2.53 4.6 16.8 57.9 672 Multl-Famltv Unit in Lame Bulldi ....... 41.0 0.108 4.44 0.85 5.2 19.2 80.5 357 Multl-Famltv Unit in Small Buildl ....... 78.1 0.108 8.45 1.39 6.1 22.2 80.5 681 Mobile Horne .......................................... 75.9 0.108 8.21 1.06 7.7 28.4 57.9 475 Education ..•....•.•..••.•.............................. 2.125.0 0.124 264.2 25.6 10.3 37.8 62.5 16,526 F<><>dS-..........•.•..•...•..•..................... 1.110.0 0.124 138.0 5.6 24.6 90.4 62.5 8,632 F<><>d Service ......................................... 1.436.0 0.124 178.5 5.6 31.9 116.9 62.5 11,168 Health Care I tlent •••.•.••.••.•.••.••••••.•.•• 60,152.0 0.124 7,479.1 241.4 31.0 113.6 62.5 487,794 Health Care nt •....•................... 985.0 0.124 122.5 10.4 11.8 43.2 62.5 7,660 Lodaino ................................................. 3,578.0 0.124 444.9 35.8 12.4 45.6 62.5 27,826 Retail rOtherThan Mall) .....•.................. 720.0 0.124 89.5 9.7 9.2 33.8 62.5 5,599 Office .................................................... 1,376.0 0.124 171.1 14.8 11.6 42.4 62.5 10,701 Publlc ................................... 1,338.0 0.124 166.4 142 11.7 43.0 62.5 10,405 Public Order and ........................ 1,791.0 0.124 222.7 15.5 14.4 52.7 62.5 13,928 Rel w ................................. 440.0 0.124 54.7 10.1 5.4 19.9 62.5 3,422 Service .•.••.•.•..•.•..•.••.•.•.••••.•..•................ 501.0 0.124 62.3 6.5 9.6 35.1 62.5 3,696 Warehouse and Storaae ........................ 764.0 0.124 95.0 16.9 5.6 20.6 62.5 5,942 Other ..................................................... Vacant •••.•..•....•..•.•..•.•.•.•..•..•.•....••.•.•....•. Sources All data in black text Energy conswT1ptlon for residential buildings Energy consumption for commerciat buildings and Floorspace per building Carbon Coefficient for Buildings Residential floorspace per unit 3,600.0 0.124· 447.6 21.9 20.4 294.0 0.124 36.6 14.1 2.6 King County, ONRP. Con1act: Matt Kuharic, matt.kuharic@klngcounty.gov 2007 Buildings Energy Data Book: 6.1 Quad Definitions and Comparisons (National Average, 2001) Table 6.1.4: Average Aooual Carbon Dioxide Emissions for Various Functions http://buildlngsdatabook.eren.doe.gov/ Data also at http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recslrecs2001 _ ce/ce 1-4c _ housingunits2001.html EIA. 2003 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2003) Table C3. Consumption and Gross Energy Intensity for Sum of Major Fuels for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003 http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed _ tables _2003/2003set9/2003excel/c3.xls 74.9 62.5 27,997 9.5 62.5 2,286 Note: Data in plum color is found in both of the above sources (buildings energy data book and commerclal buildings energy consumption survey). Buiidings Energy Data Book. {National average, 2005) Table 3.1.7. 2005 Carbon 0:0xide Emission Coefficients for Buildings (MMTCE per Quadrillion Btu) http:/ibui!dingsdatabook. eere .energy. gov/?ld=view _ book_ table& T abJeJO= 2057 Note: Carbon coefficient in the Energy Data book is in MTCE per Quadrillion Btu. To convert to MTC02e per million Btu, this factor was divided by 1000 and multiplied by 44/12 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2001) Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeulrecs/sqft-measure.html Lifespan Ene,g\ Related MTC02e emissions pe1 thousand SQuare feet 266 422 489 448 646 "1,541 1.994 1,938 737 777 5n 723 733 899 339 599 352 1.278 162 average Uef span of buildings. esUmated by replacement time method Single Family Multi-Family Units All Residential Homes in Large and Buildings Small Buildinas New Housing Construction, 2001 1 273,000 329.000 1,602,000 Existing Housing Stock, 2001 73 700,000 26.500.000 100,200,000 Replacement (national time: 57.9 80.5 62.5 average, 2001) Note: Sfngle family homes calculation is used for mobile homes as a best estimate life span. Note: At this Ume, KC staff could find no reliable data for the average life span of commercial buildings. Therefore, the average life span of residential buildings is being used until a better approximation can be ascertained. ~ New Housing Construction, 2001 Quarterly Starts and Completions b:t Purpose and Design -US and Regions (Excel} http://www.census.gov/const/quarterly _starts_ completions_ cust.xls See also: http://www.census.gov/constlwww/newrescqnstindex.html Existing Housing Stock, 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) 2001 Tables HC1:Housing Unit Characteristics, Million U.S. Households 2001 Table HC1-4a. Housing Unit Characteristics by Type of Housing Unit. Million U.S. Households., 2001 MIiiion U.S. Households, 2001 http://www.eiadoe.gov/emeuJrecs/recs2.001/hc__pdf/housunltslhe1-4a_houslngunits2001.pdf , , .... ,.,uu,-.. ...,, ~,.,_...,,_. -.-.u,-l'Dl:>4 Type (Residential) or Principal Activity ICommen;ial Slnole-Famlrv Home ....•..........•.................. Multi-Famnv Unit In la'""' Buildlna ........... Multi-Fam11" Unit in Small Building ........... Mobile Home •.......................•••................. Education ••.•................................•..•.••••... Food Sales ...............••......•...................... Food Service •.........................•.•............•. Health Care In ent .....................•.•.••.... Health Care ' Ill•••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Lodainn .................................................... Retail <Other Than MaUl ••.......................... Office .......................•............................... Public Assem ···········•·························· Public Order and Safpn, ........................... Rellclous Worshln ............•••••••................. Service .••.....................•...••••..•................. Warehouse and Stn..-.e ............•.••........•. Other ................•.....••••.......•..................... Vacant ........... : .••.......•••............................ ~ All data in black text # people/ unit Residential floorspace per unlt # employees/!housand square feet vehicle related GHG emissions MTC02e/ # people or (metric tonnes year/ # thousand employees/ C02e per thousand # people/ unit or sq feet/ untt thousand person per MTC02e/ square building or buildinc ~uarefeet year ve.ar/ unit feet 2.8 2.53 1.1 4.9 13.7 5.4 1.9 0.85 2.3 4.9 9.5 11.2 1.9 1.39 1.4 4.9 9.5 6.8 2.5 1.06 2.3 4.9 12.2 11.5 30.0 25.6 1.2 4.9 147.8 5.8 5.1 5.6 0.9 4.9 25.2 4.5 10.2 5.6 1.8 4.9 50.2 9.0 455.5 241.4 1.9 4.9 2246.4 9.3 19.3 10.4 1.9 4.9 95.0 9.1 13.6 35.8 0.4 4.9 67.1 1.9 7.8 9.7 0.8 4.9 38.3 3.9 28.2 14.8 1.9 4.9 139.0 9.4 6.9 14.2 0.5 4.9 34.2 2.4 18.8 15.5 1.2 4.9 92.7 6.0 4.2 10.1 0.4 4.9 20.8 2.1 5.6 6.5 0.9 4.9 27.6 4.3 9.9 16.9 0.6 4.9 49.0 2.9 18.3 21.9 0.8 4.9 90.0 4.1 2.1 14.1 0.2 4.9 10.5 0.7 King County, DNRP. Contact: Matt Kuharic, matt.kuharic@kingcounty.gov Estimating Household Size for Use in Population Estimates (WA state, 2000 average) Washington State Office of Financial Management Kimpel, T. and Lowe, T. Research Brief No. 47. August 2007 http://v.ww.ofm.wa.gov/researchbriefs/brief047 .pdf Average Building Life Snan 57.9 80.5 80.5 57.9 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Note: This analysjs combines Multi Unit Structures in both large and small units into one category; the average is used in this case although there is likely a difference 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2001) Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqft·measure.html Life span transportation related GHG emissions (MTC02e/ oer unit 792 766 766 709 9247 1579 3141 140506 5941 4194 2394 8696 2137 5796 1298 1729 3067 5630 657 CofTimercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey commercial energy uses and costs (National Median. 2003) Table 82 Totals and Medians of Floorspace. Number of Workers, and Hours of Operation for Non·MaU Buildings., 2003 http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeufcbecs/cbecs2003/detailed_tables_2003/2003set1l2003excel/b2.xls Note: Data for# employees/thousand square feel is presented by CBECS as square feet/employee. Life span transportation related GHG emissions (MTC02e/ thousand sq feet 313 904 550 668 381 282 561 562 571 117 247 568 150 374 129 266 181 257 47 In this analysis emp!oyeestthousand square feet is calculated by taking the inverse of the CBECS number and multiplying by 1000. vehicle related GHG emissions Estimate calculated as follows (Washington state, 2006)_ 56,531,930,000 2006 Annual WA State Vehicie Miles Traveled Data was daily VMT. Annual VMT was 365'*daily VMT. http:llwww.'NSdot.wa.gov!mapsdata/tdo/annualmileage.htm 6,395,798 2006 WA state population http:/lquickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/53000.html 8839 vehicle miles per person per year 0.0506 gallon gasotine/mile This is the weighted national average fuel efficiency for all cars and 2 axle, 4 wheel light trucks In 2005. This includes pickup trucks, vans and SWs. The 0.051 gallons/mile used here is the inverse of the more commonly known term ·miles/per gallon· (which is 19.75 for these cars and light trucks). Transportation Energy Data Sook. 26th Edition. 2006. Chapter 4: Light Vehlcies and Characteristics. Calculations based on weighted average MPG efficiency of cars and light trucks. http:/lcta. oml. gov/data/tedb26/Editlon26 _ Chapter04. pdf Note: This report states that in 2005, 92.3% of all highway VMT were driven by the above described vehicles. http://cta.oml.gov/data/tedb26/SpreadsheetsfTable3_04.xls 24.3 lbs C02e/gallon gasoline The CO2 emissions estimates for gasoline and diesel include the extraction. transport,·and refinement of petroleum as well as their combustion. Life-Cycle CO2 Emissions for Various New Vehicles. RENew Northfield. Available: http://renewnorthfield.org/wpcontenVuploads/2006/04/C02%2Demissions.pdf Note: This is a conservative estimate of emissions by fuel consumption because diesel fuel, 2205 with a emissions factor of 26.55 lbs C02e/gallon was not estimated. 4.93 lbs/metric tonne vehicle related GHG emissions (metric tonnes C02e per pel1i0n per year) average lief span of buildings, estimated by replacement time method See Energy Emissions Worksheet for Calculations Commercial floorspace per unit EIA, 2003 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (National Average. 2003) Table CJ. Consumption and Gross Energy Intensity for Sum of Major Fuels for Non-Mall Buildings. 2003 http://www.ela.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed_tables_2003/200~set9/2003excel/c3.xls TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY @ King County State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-72 I 7 Purpose of the checklist J I The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW Chapter 43.21 C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for the applicants This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations such as zoning, shoreline and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably · related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. [fej&©&OW&ify FEB 2 9 2008 L':V K.C. 0.0.E.S. TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT A. BACKGROUND. I. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Wilson 8-Lot Short Plat 2. Names of Applicant: Ed Wilson and Nahn Busse/le, husband and wife, Brenda Tran 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owners/ Applicant: OwnersjApplicant: Agent: 4. Date checklist prepared: February 28, 2008 5. Agency requesting checklist: Ed Wilson and Nahn Busse/le 12029 SE 176• Street Renton, WA 98058 Brenda Tran 12029 SE 176• Street Renton, WA 98058 PK Enterprises 23035 SE 26? Street Maple Valley, WA 98038 (206) 227.7445 Contact: Mr. Phillip Kitzes EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, Land Use Service Division 6. Proposed project timing or schedule (include phasing, if applicable): Upon application being deemed complete: Checklist Review: 1-3 months Land Use Review/Hearing: 6-8 months Engineering Review/Permitting: 4-6 months Plat Construction: 2-3 months Home construction is expected to begin in the Summer of 2009 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time. TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USB ONLY 8. List any environmental infonnation you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. • Level 1 Downstream Analysis prepared by Preferred Engineers, LLC, • Critical Areas Determination Report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. • Addendum (Critical Areas Determination Report) prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. • Report of Geotechnica/ Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc. 9. Do you know of pending applications for governmental approvals of other proposals dfrectly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None are known. I 0. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposals, if known. • Preliminary/Final Short Plat Review • SEPA Review • Final Engineering Review (County and Utility District) • Right-of-Way Agreements/Utility Easements (Bonneville Power and others) • NPDES Permit (storm water) • Corp of Engineers Permit (possible) • Forest Practice Permit (possible) 11. Give a complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in the checklist which ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is a 8-Lot short subdivision located on a 2.57-acre site. The current zoning is R-6; thus, there is a potential for 15 lots/residences allowed on the property. A majority of the property is in sensitive areas (a wetland and stream) and their associated buffers which reduces the amount of buildable land on the properties. The minimum lot size is 3,600 square feet (40' x 907. Sufficient area is provided for recreation on-site, while the proposed storm water pond will be located off-site (easement required-same ownership). Direct access will come from 11Ei" Avenue SE (2 lots) and SE 180th Street (6 /ots)- frontage improvements on both roadways is required. Water (12-inch main) and sewer (minimum 8-inch main) will be extended to the project with approvals from Soos Creek (purveyor). 12. Location of the proposal. Please give sufficient infonnation for a person to understand the precise location of your project, including street address, if any. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, please provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Please provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if possible. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to the checklist. (Indicate if maps or plans have been submitted as part of a permit application). TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY The properties are vacant and there is no address available. Again, one property {Tran) is accessible from 11£lh Avenue SE and the Assessor's Parcel Number is 619660-0520. The second property (Wilson and Busse/le) is served from SE 18dh Street and the Assessor's Parcel Number is 619660-0540. Both properties ara located within Iha Northwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 23 North, Renge 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington. (Please see enclosed vicinity map and legal descriptions.) B. ENVIRONMENT AL ELEMENTS. 1. Earth. a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat, rolling. hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other ______ _ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent of slope): The site generally slopes in a northeasterly direction with the steepest slope on site being an isolated area with 10-15 percent downward gradient slope. c. What general types of soil are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, please specify and note any prime farmland. The soils onsite consist of Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgB and AgC) and Seattle Muck (Sk) so/ls acr:ording to the National Resources Conservation Service Survey. {Please see Report of Geotechnicel Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no known sutface indications of unstable soils on, or in the immediate vicinity of the proposed site location. {Please sea Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) e. Describe the purposes, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading will be limited to the construction of the proposed road and access tract, lots, water, sewer, other utf/ltfes, recreation areas, and the proposed detention fadlity. There will be approximately 3,000 cubic yards of cut and fill within this project. The project will attempt to balance the amount of cut and fit~ so that no additional import or export of material should be necessary. If any import or export of material necessary for this project it will be approved at TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT final engineering and obtained from or deposited to a County approved site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion could occur during clearing and grading operations associated with this project. To minimize the impacts of the project, appropriate erosion control measures w/11 be reviewed and approved by the County prior to construction activity associated with this project. {Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after construction ( for example, asphalt or buildings)? The Iota/lot area is roughly 111,829 square feet. The area within the public road to be constructed is 2,550 square feet-off-site (within existing right-of-way). With approximately 33,678 square feet in the lots and assuming a maximum 55% impervious surface per lot (Code), there is a total of 18,523 square feet additional impervious surface. Thus, the total new impervious surface area is 21,073 square feat, or 19 percent of the entire site. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction, various measures are expected to be used to control erosion. These methods include construction during the dry season, the use of slit fences and hay ·balls, and revegetation of disturbed areas. Specific temporary erosion and sediment control measures w/11 be reviewed and approved by the County prior to construct/on. {Please sea Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) 2. AIR. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke, greenhouse gases) during construction, and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Temporary emmissions (i.e. dust, vahicle related, etc.) from equipment will occur during the construction phase of this project. Upon complation, there will be additional emmisssions from the residences (fireplaces) and residents (automotive, etc.). (Please see enclosed worksheet for green house gases provided by the County.) b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor which may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Other than the existing residences and vehicular movements along SE 18d" Street and 1111" Avenue SE, there are none to our knowledge. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts, if any: Construction equipment will comply with epplicable air quality regulations, as prescribed by the County, State and Federal regulations. Dust emissions will be controlled during site construction by the use of best management practices, including periodic watering of disturbed areas. n,e project will not rely upon wood burning fireplaces as the primary source of heat for the new homes. All new homes will use natural gas and/or electricity to provide heat, reducing emissions caused by wood burning fires. 3. WATER. a. Surface: I) Is there any surface water on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, associated wetland)? If yes, describe type, provide names, and, if known, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. On-site, there is an existing wetland (Wetland AB) and stream (seasonal tributary) on. the project site. Also, there are several wetlands and streams off-site of this property--including a portion of Big Soos Creek. (For a complete listing of the surface water bodies, please see report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.- includes location and type.) 2) Will the project require any work over or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The entire development is within 200 feet of these water bodies; thus, construction activity will occur within 200 feet of said waters. It may be necessary to extend water (12-inch) and sewer (8-inch minimum) through portions of the buffers to serve the development-both on-and off-site. (Please see enclosed water and sewer analysis from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District.) In addition, it may be necessary to extend other utilities within these same sensitive areas. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate source of fill materials. EVALUATION POR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT At this time, there is no proposed filling or dredging being proposed to construct the development. However, there may be a need for dredging and/or filling based on the design of Soos Creek Water and Utility District for water and sewer extensions onto the project site and/or from adjacent properties. If required, the source of fill would be manufactured on-site with native soils. 4) Will surface water withdrawals or diversions be required by the proposal? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a I 00-year floodplain? Note location on the site plan, if any. Not to our knowledge. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn or recharged? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste water material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): I) Describe the source of runoff and storm water and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will the water flow into other waters? If so, please describe. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Storm water runoff from road improvements and residences will be collected . via a series of connected pipes to be ultimately discharged into an off-site water quality/detention facility. This facility would be for water quality purposes only. Once treated, the water will be discharged at the lowest natural point, to the existing stream channel-Big Soos Creek. (Please see Drainage Report and Conceptual Drainage Plan prepared by Preferred Engineering, LLC). 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. The proposal includes a water quality treatment component to the pond that will filter out contaminants prior to entering ground and/or surface waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: All development and engineering requirements imposed by the County to control the Impacts to the hydrology of the area will be performed by the proponent. These include design of the stormwater facilities pursuant to the 2005 KCSWDM. 4. PLANTS. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ..JQL deciduous tree: alder. maple, aspen, other: cottonwood ..JQL evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: ..JQL shrubs: ..JQL grass ..JQL pasture crop or grain ..JQL wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other: salmonberry water plants: water lily, eelgrass. mil foil, other other types of vegetation (For a complete list of wet soil/water flora, please see report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Vegetation for the road Improvements and residences will be removed. In addition, there may be the need to remove vegetation EVALUATION POR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT with the wetland/stream buffers for utilities requiring a mitigation plan. c. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on near the site. None, to our knowledge. d. List proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The development will have a park area that will be planted according to an approved landscape plan prepared during the final engineering phase. In doing so, the developer will be compliant with the existing codes and regulations required by the County with respect to preservance or enhancement of existing vegetation on the site. S. ANIMALS. a. Circle (underline) any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or. are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ____ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: rodents Fish: bass, salmon, trout, shellfish, other: ____ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None are proposed at this time .. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES. a. What kinds of energy ( electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and/or natural gas will be used to meet the project's energy needs for light and heat EVALUATION POR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List any other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Construction of the new homes will meet or exceed the necessary energy requirements of the Northwest Energy Code, the 2005 Internatlonal Bui/ding Code, and those addittonally adopted by the County. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. a. Are there any environmental health hazards, exposure to toxic chemicals, including risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. I. Describe Special Emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are proposed at this time. b. Noise. I . What type of noise exists in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing vehicular traffic along SE 1Bdh Street and 11£f' Avenue SE. 2. What types of levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during site development Construction would occur primarily during the daylight hours, and in compliance with all BVALUATION POR AGBNCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT applicable codes. Heavy equipment, hand tools, and the transporting of construct/on equipment generate construction noise. At 200 feet from the construction, Leq would be approximately the fol/owing: Activity Clearing Excavation Foundations Building Construct/on Finishing Lea fin decibels/ 71-72 59-77 65 60-72 62-77 Long-tenn impacts would be those associated with the increase in site users. Additional traffic would be generated by future uses. The increase in noise would be typical of a single-family resident/al development of this size and would be considered minimal Sound levels for various noise sources include: Noise Sources Automobile Starting Closing car Door Loud Voices Automobile/Truck Traffic Sound Level at . 100 feet (dBAJ 50-55 50-55 50 50 3. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction activities will be perfonned during normal daytime working hours and compllant with the rules and regulations set forth by King County. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE. a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Both properties are vacant and undeveloped. The following is the known current uses of the adjacent properties: • North • South • East • West Single-family residences Single-family residences Single-family residence Single-family residences b. Has the site been used for agricultural purposes? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. EVALUATION POR AGBNCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTl!D BY APPLICANT Again, there is a single-family residence with associated outbuildings present on the property. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not applicable. e. What is the current zoning of the site? nie current zoning is single family residential R-6 (6 units per acre). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? nie current comprehensive plan designation is urban residentiai medium (Single Family, 4-12 units per acre). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program environment designation of the site? Not app//cable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. As stated previously, there is an existing wetland and stream on this particular property. (Please see the Critical Areas Determination Report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.) 1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Based on a household occupancy rate of 2.92 people per single- family residence, It Is expected that approximately 26 new people will reside in the eight (8) new residences. j. Proposed measures to reduce displacement impacts, if any? None are proposed at this time. k. What are the proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: nie proposed 8-lot short subdivision with slngle-famlly residences is consistent with recent and existing development in the area, current zoning, and comprehensive plan designations. nie project will be compliant with the County Code. !!VALUATION FOR AGBNCY UBI! ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 9. HOUSING. a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is expected that the project will provide up to 8 new single-family resident/al units in the mlddle income level. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. IO. AESTHETICS. a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s) not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The County's zoning code restricts the building heights of single- famlly resident/a/ strudures to 35'. Exterior materials will typically consist of wood or hardy backer type siding with brick, rock, or shingle accents. Specific materlafs wt/I be detennlned by the home builder at the time of building pennit and will comply with applicable County regulatlons. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any? None are proposed at this time. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE. a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Light and/or glare would occur primarily during evening and night time hours and would be limited to any new street lights, house lights, . and minimal security lighting potentially within the park spaces. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your project? None. d. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 12. RECREATION. a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Maplewood Golf Course and Ron Regis Park are approximately 3.3miles north of the site. Another golf course, Fairwood Golf and Country Club, is approximately 2.1 miles to the east of this project. A bit closer, also to the east, is Renton Park along 13d1' A venue SE. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The project Is proposing to construct an on-site park area to serve the new residents. A development of this size (8 lots) requires 3,120 square feet (8 times 390 square feet) of recreation space which will be provided on-site. BVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USB ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION. a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on the site. None are known. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 14. TRANSPORTATION. a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any: Both portions of this project are immediately accessible to SE 18d" Street and 18d" Avenue SE, connecting to SE 176" Street (Petrovitsky), which connects directly to SR 167 and SR 405. (Please see Preliminary Plat for proposed access point). b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. The nearest public bus access Is at the intersection of 11 ti" Avenue SE and SE 176" Street, which Is approximately one-half mile northwest of this project (Bus Route 155). c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Assuming a minimum of 4 parking spaces per household (2-car garage and a 2-car driveway), there will be at least 32 new parking spaces provided upon completion of this development. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or street, or improvements to any existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). EVALUATION FOR AGENCY UBE ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Frontage improvements to both SE lBff' Street and llt/1' Avenue SE will likely be required. Will the project use or occur in the immediate vicinity of water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Based on the !TE Manual there will be approximately 80 net new tips per day generated by this project. Peak volumes would most likely occur during typical rush hour times of 7:00 -9:00 AM and 4:00 -6:00 PM and would add approximately 8 net new AM peak and PM peak hour trips. g. What are proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The applicant will be responsible for appropriate traffic mitigation fees, which will offset some of the impacts of the subdivision. Other mitigation indudes the construdion of new roads to serve the project. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES. a. Would the project result in an increase need for public services ( for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes. There would be a minimal Increased need for fire and police protection due to an additional 8 new lots in the area. Also, there will be a minima/ impad on the present school system. b. What are proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: Property taxes, bullding permits and school lmpad mitigation fees generated from these residences are expected ID mitigate impacts incurred from this development EVALUATION POR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLETBD BY APPLICANT 17. UTILITIES. a. Circle (underline) utilities currently available at the site: electricity. natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: cable television. b. Describe the utilities which are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity: Gas: Water: Refuse: Telephone: Sewer: cable: Puget Sound Energy Puget Sound Energy Soos Creek Waler District Wasre Management Qwest Communications Soos Creek Sewer District Comcast Connection(s) to the above mentioned ut/1/tles will be negotiated with the Individual purveyor during the building pennlt and construction phases of this project. There may also be a need for a right-of-way pennlt{s) to gain access to the property at construct/on. There may also be a need to extend an 8-lnch or greater line (waler and/or sewer) that will be delennlned at final engineering approval by the utility purveyor. C. SIGNATURE. The above answers are true to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Agent for the Applicant: Date Submitted: --------- EVALUATION POR AGBNCY USB ONLY WILSON-TRAN 8-LOT SHORT PLAT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (619660-0520) LOT 8, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNlY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE SOUTH 90 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET THEREOF. (619660-0540) LOT 9, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNlY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE WEST 375 FEET. MapQuest: Maps, Addresses, Business Directory & Satellite Photos --- 17844 120th Ave Se Renton WA 98058-6648 us Notes: Only text visible within note field will print. r.:_· r.- AH rlahts reserved. Use Subiect to Uceose/Coovdoht . save,lnld ~d maps 1111d·dii;octicns. Jo::rrur:mobile,phone :rtfJt\Now! Page I of I This map Is Informational only. No representation Is made or warranty given as to Its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. http://www.mapquest.com/maps/print.adp?mapdata=p5kqyoo6yZK6LfzObzPBTCoEK3raj. .. 2/28/2008 Section I: Buildings Warehouse and Stora e .................... . Other ........................................... , ...... . Vacant ................................................ . Section II: Pavement ......................... . !Pavement... .......................................... I 2,550.00 Total Project Emissions: Version 1.712/26/07 Emissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet MTC02e Embodied Ene 98 33 54 41 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 357 681 475 646 1,541 1,994 1,938 737 777 577 723 733 899 339 599 352 1,278 162 129 266 181 257 47 ____ 1:,::2;,.:75:.:..00::.,! 139995! Sources: 1111111 Residential Commercial D fl ltl e n ono f B I T ui dinn I vnes Type (Residential) or Principal Activity Commercial) Descrlotlon Unless otherwise specified, this includes both attached and detached Sincle-Familv Home .................................. buildings Muill-Famllv Unit In Large Buildino ........... Apartments in buildings with more than 5 units Multi-Family Unit in Small Building ........... Apartments In building with 2-4 units Mobile Home ............................................. Bulldlngs used for academic or technical classroom Instruction, such as elementary, middle, or high schools, and classroom buildings on college or universfty campuses. Buildings on education campuses for which the main use is not classroom are Included in the category relating to their use. For example, administration buildings are part of "Office," dormitories are Education .................................................. "Lodolng," and libraries are "Public Assembly." Food Sales ............................................... Buildings used for retail or wholesale of food. Buildings used for preparation and sale of food and beverages for Food Service ............................................ consumction. Health Care lnoatient ................................ Buildlnas used as diaanostic and treatment facilities for lnoatient care. Bulldlngs used as diagnostic and treatment facilities for outpatient care. Docto(s or dentist's office are Included here if they use any type of diagnostic Health Care Outoalient ............................. medical eaulpment (if thev do not, they are catAnorized as an office bulldlno). Buildings used to offer multiple accommodations for shorMerm or long.term Lodging ..................................................... residents, inc/udino skilled nurslna and other residential care buildinas. Retail (Other Than MaliJ ............................ Buildinos used for the sale and disolav of aoods other than food. Buildings used for general office space, professional office, or administrative offices. Docto(s or dentist's office are Included here If they do not use any type of diagnostic medical equipment (if they do, they are categorized as an Office ........................................................ outoaUent health care buildlnn1. Buildings In which people gather for social or recreational activities, whether in Public Assemblv ....................................... orlvate or non-Drivate meeting halls. Public Order and Safetv ............. : ............. Buildinas used for the preservation of law and order or oublic safety. Buildings In which people gather for religious activities, (such as chapels, Religious Worship .................................... churches, mosQues, synagogues, and temDles). Buildings In which some type of service is provided, other than food service or Service ...................................................... retail sales of ooods Buildings used to store goods. manufactured products, merchandise,. raw Warehouse and Storaae .......................... materials, or oersonal belongings (such as self-storaoel. Bulldings that are industrial or agricultural with some retail space; buildings having several different commercial activities that, together, comprise 50 percent or more of the floorspace, but whose largest single activity Is agricultural, Industrial/ manufacturing, or residential; and all other Other ......................................................... miscellaneous buildinas that do not fit Into anv other cat=orv. Buildings In which more floorspace was vacant than was used for any single commercial activity at the time of interview. Therefore, a vacant building may Vacant ...................................................... have some occucied floorsn::ace. 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqft-measure.hbnl Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS), Description of CBECS Building Types http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/pbagg/bldgtypes.html AYerllge GWP (lbs C02o'lq fl): V~. LowRlsezt.........., Embodied Em1as1ons Wcrbheet Section t: A,.n.th, Life span related Ufe span related embodied # thousand emt>odied GHG GHG missions (MTC02d Type (Rosidential) or Principal Activity! 9q fed/ unit misslcWls (MTC02d thousand l(IUaf1I feet). s.: ICommerciai\l or ... ~-unit calculllbons In table belowi Home····-········-····-·····-··· 2.53 98 39 loUtH=srniylJnttlrl~~------·.,J ___ Q.85,._ 33 39 Mutti-Fmnly Unit In Small Building -~-~:::.: 1 ·--·--1.39i 541 39 ~~:::::::::~=::::=:::::~::~~:::=:== ___ 2~~ _--s:~ : ~-· ·-····-·· ··· 1 ,, I "'I 391 Food 5ervk:e ......................................... 5.6 217 39 Heallt1 Care lnDd!nt ·····--·---············· ___ 2A1.4 9,346 39 "-""'-··-·-············1 "'I '°'I·-· 391 = ··-······-·······-------------------------···· 35.8 1 386 39 Retail OlherThanM.il).......................... 9.7 376 39 -~ ·-····-·-······:··-·············-··········-···1 14.R I .,,f .. 391 Pubic Anembly--···--·---·-------·-·-·-·-14.2 550 39 PubllcOrderends.faty.-...................... 15.5 600 39 Rellalous Worshlo ........ : ................ .-.:.~·:: .. , · 10.1 I 3911 39 SeMce .................................................. 6.5 252 39 W-"cuse and 5ttnp ...... .............. 16.9 654 39 I~ ........... _,·=·········-·····----·----·- Section a: P.-.nt... \AD Types d Pavsnent. ... Cdomns,nd ..... ,., 21.9~ --B48J 39 .1!,!j__ _ 546 39 ~ -"""' ......w ... -,., 19.1 512 Avenige~ln•2~foot """"' MTC02o ....... All ~ In blaek text R~dential fioofwaee per unit floorspace per buikflng A-. GWP (lbs C02elsq ft~ Vancouver. Low Rise Building A.vetiige Materials in 1 2.272-square foot single family home :..-,e,09e,:..~111.1<-,... :-!Z!l 0.0 2269.0 3206.0 ,'i;!;_{, 0.0 ao te.ig County, ONRP. Coniact: Matt KuhWiC. matLkuharlc@klngcounty.gov 2001 R~NI Ensv'fConsurnptlon Survey(Nillional AvetaQe, 2001) Square footage measurements and compaMOn$ htlp';!,-,,,.ei,;.cloe.~/emeu/reahqft-menure.trtml 27.8 EIA.. 2003 COmmerdal Bulldlog:s Energy Cc:n51JfflPtior! SUNey {Nabonal Aver~a. 2003) T.t,1e C3. Consumptm and Gr= E~y lnternllty for Sum of Mi,tCJI" Fuels. for Non-Man Buildmg:fl. 2003 http';!Jw#W.U.doe.gov/emeulcbecslcbecs20031detalled_ tat>les _ 2003.'2003set9l2003excellc3..ffll Athena EcoCatculator Athena Assembly Evaluation Tool v2.3-Vanc:ouver Low Risa &1lldlng Assemtlly Average GWP (kg) p.-square meter t,ttp;/1-w..athenasrnl..c~ Lbs per kg 2.20 Square feet per square meter 10.76 Buildings Energy Data Book: 7.3 Typical/Awsrage Hou$et'lold Materials Used In the Coistrudiorl of a 2.272-5quare-,-Foot Single-Femly t-lome. 2000 http://tJulldlng$dataereii..doe.g~_boc*_table&TeblelDr2036&1-m See also: NAHB, 2004 Housing Fam, Figures and Tl'Ol'lds., Feb. 2004. p. 7. En~ !nt(fl':'.et,cn A-1rt1111i$.l.!3tiilrt'Hm:::il",g (hM.:tO'-..:,i::;t,t ~ 1,)'::.;:, App~, S, Cvt>ft"f ¢, ll'I~ G.;t.l. ::-a f;. ;1.p~·,~. t-;!l!.d~-1,.;c,;:ipvbfC¢f't$.;m~1¢...,t,;.~J<:~t;ai;r <'! }h~. pol ,., -w ... -,., 21.3 '""' '""""""""' --,e=: (IITC02• 6050.0 3103.0 thouund ..... feet: 15.6 30.0 88.0 "·' Pavement Emlul0ttt: Feetnrs MTC02eftl~s~ 1,quare feet of asphalt or Com:n'ITl'l paverrwmt EmbodkKI GHG Emt11fool Bu11dlngs ~o fae below) Worksheet BackaJPUnd tnformation Embodied GHG emissions are emissions that are created through the extraction. proces&lng. transportation, construction and disposal of buUding matarials as wen as emissions created through landscape disturbance (by both soil disturbance and changes In abow ground biomass). Estimating embodied GHG emissions Is new field of analysis; the estimates are rapidly Improving and becoming more Inclusive of au elements of construction and de'11'81opment. The estimate included In this worksheet is calculated using a\1'8rage values for the main construction materials that are used to create a typical family home. In 2004, the National Association of Home Builders calculated the average materials that are used In a typical 2272 SC1uare foot single-family household. The quantity of materials used ls then multiplied by the average GHG emissions associated with the life<yde GHG eml$$1ons for each material. This estimate Is a rough and conservative estimate; the actual embodied emissions for a project are likely to be higher. For example, at this stage. due to a lack of comprehensive datl, the estimate does not include lmportant factors SUCh as landscape dlstutbance or the emissions assoclatad with the Interior components of a bulldlng (such as fumttura). King County realizes that the calaJlatlons for embodied emlsslons In this worksheet are rough. For example, the emissions asseciated with buOding 1,000 square feet of a residential building wW not be the same as 1.000 square feet of a commercial building. However, discu$$1onS with the construction community Indicate that while there are significant differences between the different types of structures. this method of estimation Is reasonable: It wiD be lmproved as more data become available. Additlonally, lf more specific lnfonnatlon about the project ts known, King County recommends two online embodied emissions calculators that can be used to obtain a more tailored estimate for embodied emissions: www bulldcarbonneutral qrg and WtrW athenasml ra/lools/ecoCalculator/. Pavement Four recent lifa cycle assessments of the environmental Impacts of roads fonn the basis for the per unit embodied emlSsions of pavument Each study Is constnx:ted in sllghtly different ways; however, the aggregate results of the reports represent a reasonable estimate of the GHG emissions that are created from the manufacture of paving materials, construction related emisslons, and maintenance of the pavement over its expected life cycle. For specifics. see the worksheet. Spacial Sactioni Estlmatlne thp Embodied Emissions tor Pavement Four recent life cycle assessments of the environmental Impacts of roads form the basis for the per untt embodiod emissions of pavement. Each study ts constructed In slightly different ways; however, the aggregate results of the reports represent a reasonable estimate of the GHG emisskms that are aaated from the manufacture of paving materials, construction related emissions, and maintenance of the pavement over its expected life cycle. The reSl..llts of the sb.Jdles are presented In different units and measures: considerable effort was undertaken to be able to comparg the results of the studies in a reasonable wtirf. For more details about the below methodology, contact matt.kuharic@klngcounty.gov. The four studies. Meil (2001), Park (2003), Strtpple (2001} and Treolar(2001) produced total GHG emissions of4-34: MTC02e per thousand square feet of flnlshecl paving (for similar asphalt and concrete based pavements). This estimata does not including downstream maintenance and repair of the highway. The average (for aD concrete and asphatt pa...ements In the studies, assuming each study gets one data point) Is -17 MTC02e/thousand square feet. Three of the studies attempted to thoroughly account for the emissions associated wtth king tenn maintenance (40 years) of the roads. Strtpple (2001 ), Park et al. (2003) and Treolar (2001} report 17, 61, and 66 MTC02e/'thousand squara feet. respectively, after accounting for maintenance of the roads. Based on the above discussion, King County makes the conservative estimate that 50 MTC02e/thousand squam feet of pavement (over the development's life cyde} wlll be used as the embodied emission factor for pavement until better estimates can be obtained. This is roughty equivalent to 3,500 MTC02e per lane mile of road (assuming the lane Is 13 feet wide). It is Important to note that these studies estimate the embodied emfsslons for roadS. Paving that does not need to stand up to the rigors of heavy use (such as parldng lots or driveways) '-NOUld h'kely use less materials and hence have lcNver embodied emissions. -Mell, J, A Life Cycle Perspective on Concrete and Asphalt Roadways: Embodied Primary Energy and Global Wanning Potential. 2006. Available: http:IJw.vw cement.ca/cement osf/eee9ec7btxt6301268525§6c4QQS2107b/Bec79dc8ae03a782852572b90061 b9 14/SFJLE/ATIK(MIE31athena%20reoort%20feb.%2Q2%2()2007 pdf Park, K, Hwang, Y., Seo, 5., M.ASCE, and Seo. H. , "Quantitative Assessment of Environmental Impacts on Life Cyde of Highways; Journal of Construction Engineering and Management , Vol 129. January/February 2003, pp 25-31, (DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364{2003)129:1(25)). Sbipple, H. Life Cycle Assessment of Road. A Pilot Study for Inventory Analysis. Second Revised Edition. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd. 2001. Availabie: http:/(www.M.seJrapporterfodflB121QE.pdf Treloar, G., Love, P .E.D., and Crawfun:J, R.H. Hybrid LlflH:ycle Inventory for Road Construction and Use. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. P. 43-49. January/February 2004. 011:l'I r:rm~::.IUII~ VVUlll.~r- Ene'II) Flo=pace MTCEper consumption per Carbon per BuUding thousand MTC02eper Average Lifespan Energy Type (Residential) or Principal ActM~ building per year Coefficient for MTC02eper (thousand square feet per thousand square Building Life Related MTC02e (Commercial (mllllon Btu Buildinos buildlnn ,,... \IP:lrl ~uarefeet -·· feet ,..,.r VIII:., S=n emissions !Vlr unit Sinale-Famlty Horne .••.•.•.•.•••••.•..•.•..•.•.•• 107.3 0.108 11.61 2.53 4.6 16.8 57.9 672 Muto.Family Unit In La!Tlfil Build.lOA •.••.•. 41.0 0.106 4.44 0.65 5.2 19.2 80.5 357 Multl-Famuv Unit in SmaD Buildina •.•.•.• 78.1 0.108 8.45 1.39 6.1 22.2 60.5 661 Mobile Horne .......................................... 75.9 0.108 8.21 1.06 7.7 28.4 57.9 475 EducaUon .............................................. 2,125.0 0..124 264.2 25.6 10.3 37.8 62.5 16.526 Food Sales ..•....•.•..•...•.•.........•.......•.•....• 1,110.0 0.124 138.0 5.6 24.6 90.4 62.5 8,632 Food Service ......................................... 1,436.0 (l.124 178.5 5.6 31.9 116.9 62.5 11,168 Health Care I tient .•...•.........•............ 60.152.0 0.124 7,479.1 241,4 31.0 113.6 62.5 467,794 Health Care r tlent ......................... 985.0 0.124 122.5 10.4 11,8 43.2 62.5 7,660 Lodalna ................................................. 3,578.0 0.124 444.9 35.8 12.4 45.6 62.5 27,826 Retall tOther Than Mall\ ........................ 720.0 0.124 89.5 9.7 9.2 33.8 62.5 5,599 Office .................................................... 1,376.0 0.124 171.1 14.8 11.6 42.4 62.5 10,701 Publlc Assem"'h' ........•.......................... 1,338.0 0.124 166.4 14.2 11.7 43.0 62.5 10,405 Public Order and S ····-·······-··········· 1.791.0 0.124 222.7 15.5 14.4 52.7 62.5 13,928 Relloious Wo ................................. 440.0 0.12<1 54.7 10.1 5.4 19.9 62.5 3,422 SerAce .................................................. 501.0 0.12<1 62.3 6.5 9.6 35.1 62.5 3,896 Warehouse and S ........................ 764.0 0.124 95.0 16.9 5.6 20.6 62.5 5,942 Other ..•.•..••.•....•.•.•••••.••••.•••••.•.••.•.••••.••••. Vacant ................................................... ~ All data In black text Energy consumption for residenUal buildings Energy consumption for commercial buildings and Floorspace per building Carbon Coefficient fer Buildings Resldential floorspace per unit 3,600.0 0.12<1 447.6 21.9 20.4 294.0 0.124 38.6 14.1 2.6 King County, DNRP. Contact Matt Kuharic, matt.kuharic@klngcounty.gov 2007 Bulldlngs Energy Data Book: 6.1 Quad Definitions and Comparisons (National Average, 2001) Table 6.1.4: Average Annual Carbon Dioxide Emissions for Various Functions http://buildlngsdatabook.eren.doe.gov/ Data also at http://www.ela.doe.gov/emeu/recs/recs2001 _ce/ce1-4c _houslngunits2001.html EIA, 2003 Commerclal Buildings Energy Consumption Survey(Natlonal Average, 2003) Table CJ. Consumption and Gross Energy Intensity for Sum of Major Fuels for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003 http://www.eJa.doe.gov/emeufcbecs/cbecs20031detailed_tables_2003/2003set9/2003exceVc3.xls 74.9 62.5 27,997 9.5 62.5 2.266 Note: Data In plum color is found in both of the above sources (buildings energy data book and commerclal buildings energy consumption survey). Buildings Energy Data Book (National average, 2005) Table 3.1.7. 2005 Carbon 01oxtde Emission Coefficients for Buildings {MMTCE perQu.:idri!lion Btu) http:/ /buildingsdatabook. eere.~nergy. gov/?ld=view _ book_ table& T ablelD:: 2057 Note; Carbon coefficient in the Energy Data book is ln MTCE per Quadrillion Btu. To convert to MTC02e per m111ion Btu, this factor ,,..as divided by 1000 and mu!tiplied by 44/12 2001 Resldentlal Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2001) Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.ela.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqft-measure.html Lifespan Ene'II) Related MTC02e emissions per thousand ~uare feet 266 422 469 446 646 · 1.541 1,994 1,938 737 m 5n 723 733 899 339 599 352 1,278 162 average lief span of buildings, estimated by replacement time method Single Famlfy Multi-Family Units All Residential Homes in Large and Buildings SmaD BuildirYIS New Housing Construction, 2001 1 273,000 329.000 1,602,000 Existing Housing Stoel<, 2001 73 700 000 26,500.000 100,200 000 Reptacemen {national time: 57.9 80.5 62.5 average. 2001) Note: Single family homes calculatlon Is used ·tor moblle homes as a -best estimate life span. Note: At this time, KC staff could find no reliable data for the average life span of commercial bulldlngs. Therefore, the average life span of residential buildings is being used until a better approximation can be asi::ertalned. ~ New Housing Construction, 2001 Quarterty Starts and Completions by Purpose and Design -US and RegtOns (Excel) http;//www.census.gov/const/quarterty_starts_completions_cust.xls See also: http://www.census.gov/constJwww/newresc~nstindex.html ExlsUng Housing Stock. 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey {RECS) 2001 Tables HC1 :Housing Untt Characteristics, MIilion U.S. Households 2001 Table HC1-4a. Housing Unit Characteristics by Type of Housing Unit. Million U.S. Households. 2001 Million U.S. Households, 2001 http:/lwww.eia.doe.govlemeufrecsfrecs2001/hc_pdf/housunitslhc1-4a_houslngunlts2001.pdf 11g11<;> ,..ouuu 1;;.1111-uu::,, ••u.1~1tn:a Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial Sinale-Famirv Home .................................. Multl-F Unit in eBui ........... MulU-Familv Unit in SmalJ Bulldinn ........... Mobile Home ........................................... Education ..••••••.............................•.......... Food Sales ..............••••............................ Food Service ...........•...........••.•..•............. Health Care ln-ient ......•....•................... Health Care r en! ....................••...... Lodaina ..•...........................•..................... Retail IOU,er Than Mall\. ........................... Office ....................... , .......•.••.................... Public Assemblv ..............•......•....•.•......... Public Order and Sat~ ........................... Rellalous Worshlo ..••••........•••.•................. Service .................................................... Warehouse and Storaoe .......................... Other ....................................................... Vacant ..................................................... Sources All data in black text # people/ unit Residential floorspace per unit # employees/thousand square feel vehicie related Lifespan GHG Life span transportation emissions MTC02e/ # people or (metric tonnes year/ # thousand employees/ C02e per thousand # people/ unit or sq feeU unit thousand person per MTC02e/ square bulldin!l or buildina cnuare feet vear -~r/ unit feet 2.8 2.53 1.1 4.9 13.7 5.4 1.9 0.85 2.3 4.9 9.5 11.2 1.9 1.39 1.4 4.9 9.5 6.8 2.5 1.06 2.3 4.9 12.2 11.5 30.0 25.6 1.2 4.9 147.8 5.8 5.1 5.6 0.9 4.9 25.2 4.5 10.2 5.6 1.8 4.9 50.2 9.0 455.5 241.4 1.9 4.9 2246.4 9.3 19.3 10.4 1.9 4.9 95.0 9.1 13.6 35.8 0.4 4.9 67.1 1.9 7.8 9.7 0.8 4.9 38.3 3.9 28.2 14.8 1.9 4.9 139.0 9.4 6.9 14.2 0.5 4.9 34.2 2.4 18.8 15.5 1.2 4.9 92.7 6.0 4.2 10.1 0.4 4.9 20.8 2.1 5.6 6.5 0.9 4.9 27.6 4.3 9.9 16.9 0.6 4.9 49.0 2.9 18.3 21.9 0.8 4.9 90.0 4.1 2.1 14.1 0.2 4.9 10.5 0.7 King County, DNRP. Contact: Matt Kuharic, matt.kuharic@kingcounty.gov Estimating Household Size for Use in Population Estimates (WA state, 2000 average) Washington State Office of Financial Management Kimpel, T. and Lowe, T. Research Brief No. 47. August 2007 http://www.ofm.wa.gov/researchbriefs/brief04 7 .pdf Average Bwlding Life Sna:n 57.9 80.5 80.5 57.9 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Note: This analysis combines Multi Unit Structures in both large and small units into one category; the average is used in this case although there is likely a difference 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2001) Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqft-measure.html transportation related GHG emissions (MTC02e/ aer unit 792 766 766 709 9247 1579 3141 140506 5941 4194 2394 8696 2137 5796 1298 1729 3067 5630 657 Coinmercia! Buildtngs Energ~· Consumption Survey commercial energy uses and costs (National Median, 2003) Tabte 82 Totals and Medians or Floorspace. Number of Workers, and Hours of Operation for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003 http://www.ela.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed_tables_2003/2003set1i2003excellb2.xls Note. Data for# employees/thousand square feet is presented by CBECS as square feet/employee. related GHG emissions (MTC02e/ thousand sq feet 313 904 550 668 361 282 561 582 571 117 247 588 150 374 129 266 181 257 47 In this analysis employees/thousand square feet is calculated by taking the inverse of the CBECS number and multiplying by 1000. vehicle related GHG emissions Estimate calculated as follows (Washington state, 2006)_ 56,531,930,000 2006 Annual WA State Vehicle Miles Traveled Data was daily VMT. Annual VMT was 365.daily VMT. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/mapsdata/tdo/annualmHeage.htm 6,395,798 2006 WA state population http:/lquickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/53000.html 8839 vehicle miles per person per year 0.0506 gallon gasoline/mile This is the weighted national average fuel efficiency for all cars and 2 axle, 4 wheel light trucks in 2005. This includes pickup trucks, vans and SUVs. The 0.051 gallons/mile used here is the inverse of the more commonly known term ·mlles/per gallon· (which is 19.75 for-these cars and light trucks). Transportation Energy Data Book. 26th Edition. 2006. Chapter 4: Light Vehicles and Characteristics. Calculations based on weighted average MPG efficiency of cars and light trucks. http://cta.oml.gov/data/tedb26/Edition26 _ Chapter04. pdf Note: This report states that in 2005, 92.3% of all highway VMT were driven by the above described vehicies. http://cta.oml.gov/dataltedb26/Spreadsheets/Table3_04.xls · 24.3 lbs C02e/gallon gasoline The CO2 emissions estimates for gasoline and diesel include the extraction. transport, and refinement of petroleum as weU as their combustion. Life-Cycle CO2 Emissions for Various New Vehicles. RENew Northfiekt. Available: http://renewnorthfield.org/wpcontenUuploadsl2006/04/C02%20emissions.pdf Note: This is a conservative estimate of emissions by fuel consumption because diesel fuel, 2205 with a emissions factor of 26.55 lbs C02e/gallon was not estimated. 4.93 lbs/metric tonne vehicle related GHG emissions {metric tonnes C02e per person per year) average lief span of buildings, estimated by replacement time method See Energy Emissions Worksheet for Calculations Commercial Roorspace per unit EIA, 2003 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2003) Table C3. Consumption and Gross Energy Intensity for Sum of Major Fuels for NonMMall Buildings. 2003 http://www.ela.doe.gov/emeu/cbecslcbecs2003/detailed_tables_2003/2003set9/2003excel/c3.xls TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY ® King County· State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 1TY 206-296-7217 Purpose of the checklist ,. ' ,, ... ;> '\ " ,· ;,, fr:o::.., ' , ,, II 'i) ,J ii ,, // '"::--''/'' // . CC:::' I! .C/ w The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW Chapter 43.21 C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, ifit can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for the applicants This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or ifa question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations such as zoning, shoreline and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining ifthere may be significant adverse impacts. K.C, D.O ES. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT A. BACKGROUND. I. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Wilson 8-Lot Short Plat 2. Names of Applicant: Ed Wilson and Nahn Busse/le, husband and wife, Brenda Tran 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owners/ Applicant: Owners(Appllcant: Agent: 4. Date checklist prepared: February 28, 2008 5. Agency requesting checklist: Ed Wilson and Nahn Busse/le 12029 SE 176" Street Renton, WA 98058 Brenda Tran 12029 SE 176" Street Renton, WA 98058 PK Enterprises 23035 SE 265" Street Maple Valley, WA 98038 (206) 227.7445 Contact: Mr. Phillip Kitzes EVALUATION POR AGENCY UBE ONLY King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, Land Use Service Division 6. Proposed project timing or schedule (include phasing, if applicable): Upon application being deemed complete: Checklist Review: 1-3 months Land Use Review/Hearing: 8-8 months Engineering Review/Permitting: 4-6 months Plat Construction: 2-3 months Home construction is expected to begin in the Summer of 2009 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time. TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 8. List any envirorunental infonnation you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. • Level 1 Downstream Analysis prepared by Preferred Engineers, LLC, • Critical Areas Determination Report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. • Addendum (Critical Areas Determination Report) prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. • Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc. 9. Do you know of pending applications for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None are known. JO. List any goverrunent approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposals, if known. • Preliminary/Final Short Plat Review • SEPA Review • Final Engineering Review (County and Utility District) • Right-of-Way Agreements/Utility Easements (Bonneville Power end others) • NPDES Permit (storm water) • Corp of Engineers Permit (possible) • Forest Practice Permit (possible) 11. Give a complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in the checklist which ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is a 8-Lot short subdivision located on a 2.57-acre site. The current zoning is R-6; thus, there is a potential for 15 lots/residences allowed on the property. A majority of the property is in sensitive areas (a wetland and stream) and their associated buffers which reduces the amount of buildable land on the properties. The minimum lot size is 3,600 square feet (40' x 90?. Sufficient area is provided for recreation on-site, while the proposed storm water pond will be located off-site (easement required-same ownership). Direct access will come from 11£i" Avenue SE (2 lots) and SE 180th Street (6 lots)- front11ge improvements on both roadways is required. Water (12-inch main) and sewer (minimum 8-inch main) wl/1 be extended to the project with approvals from Soos Creek (purveyor). 12. Location of the proposal. Please give sufficient infonnation for a person to understand the precise location of your project, including street address, if any. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, please provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Please provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if possible. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to the checklist. (Indicate if maps or plans have been submitted as part of a pennit application). TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT EVALUATION POR AGENCY USB ONLY The properties are vacant and there is no address available. Again, one property (Tran) is accessible from 11B'" Avenue SE and the Assessor's Parcel Number is 619660-0520. The second property (Wilson and Bussa/la) is served from SE 18d" Streat and the Assessor's Parcel Number is 619660-0540. Both properties are located within the Northwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington. (Please see enclosed vicinity map and legal descriptions.) B. ENVIRONMENT AL ELEMENTS. I. Earth. a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other ______ _ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent of slope): The site generally slopes in a northeasterly direction with the steepest slope on site being an isolated area with 10-15 percent downward gradient slope. c. What general types of soil are found on the site ( for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, please specify and note any prime farmland. The soils onsite consist of Alde,wood Gravelly Sandy loam {AgB and AgC) and Seattle Muck (Sk) soils according to the National Resources Conservation Service Survey. {Please sea Report of Gaotachnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no known surface indications of unstable soils on, or in the immediate vicinity of the proposed site location. {Please sea Report of Gaotachnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) e. Describe the purposes, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading will be limited to the construction of the proposed road and acress tract, lots, water, sewer, other utilities, recreation areas, and the proposed detention facility. There will be approximately 3,000 cubic yards of cut and fill within this project. The project will attempt to balance the amount of cut and fill, so that no additional import or export of material should be necessary. If any import or export of material necessary for this project it will be approved at TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT final engineering and obtained from or deposited to a County approved site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion could occur during clearing and grading operations associated with this project. To minimize the impacts of the project, appropriate erosion control measures will be reviewed and approved by the County prior to construction activity associated with this project. (Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious . surfaces after construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The total lot area is roughly 111,829 square feet. The araa within tha public road to be constructed is 2,550 square feet---0ff-site (within existing right-of-way). With approximately 33,678 square feet in the lots and assuming a maximum 55% impervious surface per lot (Code), there is a total of 18,523 square feet additional impervious surface. Thus, the total new impervious surface area is 21,073 square feet, or 19 percent of the entire site. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction, various measures are expected to be used to control erosion. These methods Include construction during the dry season, the use of silt fences and hay bails, and revegetation of disturbed areas. Specific temporary erosion and sediment control measures will be reviewed and approved by the County prior to construction. (Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) 2. AIR. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke, greenhouse gases) during construction, and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Temporary emmissions (i.e. dust, vehicle related, etc.) from equipment will occur during the construction phase of this project. Upon completion, there will be additional emmisssions from the residences (fireplaces) and residents (automotive, etc.). (Please see enclosed worksheet for green house gases provided by the County.) b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor which may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. EVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT other than the existing residences and vehicular movements along SE 18d" Street and 11ll" Avenue SE, there are none to our knowledge. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts, if any: Construction equipment wl/1 comply with applicable air quality regulations, as prescribed by the County, State and Federal regulations. Dust emissions will be controlled during site construction by the use of best management practices, including periodic watering of disturbed areas. The project will not rely upon wood burning fireplaces as the primary source of heat for the new homes. All new homes will use natural gas and/or electricity to provide heat, reducing emissions caused by wood burning fires. 3. WATER. a. Surface: I) Is there any surface water on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, associated wetland)? If yes, describe type, provide names, and, if known, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. On-site, there is an existing wetland (Watland AB) and stream (seasonal tributary) on the project site. Also, there are several wetlands and streams off-site of this property--including a portion of Big Soos Creek. (For a complete listing of the surface water bodies, please see report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.- includes location and type.) 2) Will the project require any work over or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The entire development is within 200 feet of these water bodies; thus, construction activity will occur within 200 feet of said waters. It may be necessary to extend water (12-inch) and sewer (8-inch minimum) through portions of the buffers to serve the development-both on-and off-site. (Please see enclosed water and sewer analysis from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District.) In addition, it may be necessary to extend other utilities within these same sensitive areas. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate source of fill materials. SVALUATION POR AGBNCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT At this time, there is no proposed filling or dredging being proposed to construct the development. However, there may be a need for dredging and/or filling based on the design of Soos Creek Water and Utility District for water and sewer extensions onto the project site and/or from adjacent properties. If required, the source of fill would be manufactured on-site with native soils. 4) Will surface water withdrawals or diversions be required by the proposal? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a I 00-year floodplain? Note location on the site plan, if any. Not to our knowledge. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: I) Will ground water be withdrawn or recharged? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste water material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): I) Describe the source of runoff and storm water and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will the water flow into other waters? If so, please describe. EVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Storm water runoff from road improvements and residences will be collected . via a series of connected pipes to be ultimately discharged into an off-site water quality/detention facility. This facility would be for water quality purposes only. Once treated, the water will be discharged at the lowest natural point, to the existing stream channel--Big Soos Creek. (Please see Drainage Report and Conceptual Drainage Plan prepared by Preferred Engineering, LLC). 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. The proposal includes a water quality treatment component to the pond that will filter out contaminants prior to entering ground and/or surface waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: All development and engineering requirements imposed by the County to control the impacts to the hydrology of the area will be perfonned by the proponent These include design of the stonnwater facilities pursuant to the 2005 KCSWDM. 4. PLANTS. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ..JQL deciduous tree: alder. maple, aspen, other: cottonwood ..JQL evergreen tree: fu:, cedar, pine, other: ..JQL shrubs: ..JQL grass ..JQL pasture crop or grain ..JQL wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other: salmonberry water plants: water lily, eelgrass. milfoil, other other types of vegetation (For a complete list of wet soil/water flora, please see report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Vegetation for the road improvements and residences will be removed. In addition, there may be the need to remove vegetation EVALUATION POR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT with the wetland/stream buffers for utilities requiring a mitigation plan. c. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on near the site. None, to our knowledge. d. List proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The development will have a park area that will be planted according to an approved landscape plan prepared during the final engineering phase. In doing so. the developer will be compliant with the existing codes and regulations required by the County with respect to preservance or enhancement of existing vegetation on the site. 5. ANIMALS. a. Circle (underline) any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or. are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ____ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: rodents Fish: bass, salmon, trout, shellfish, other: ____ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None are proposed at this time .. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES. a. What kinds of energy ( electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and/or natural gas will be used to meet the project's energy needs for light and heat EVALUATION POR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List any other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Construdion of the new homes will meet or exceed the necessary energy requirements of the Northwest Energy Code, the 2005 Intematlonal Building Code, and those additionally adopted by the County. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. a. Are there any environmental health hazards, exposure to toxic chemicals, including risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. I. Describe Special Emergency services that might be required. Not appl/cable. 2. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are proposed at this time. b. Noise. I. What type of noise exists in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing vehicular traffic along SE 18d" Street and 11B'" Avenue SE. 2. What types of levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-temi impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during site development Construction would occur primarl/y during the daylight hours, and In compliance with all EVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USB ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT applicable codes. Heavy equipment, hand tools, and the transporting of construction equipment generate construction noise. At 200 feet from the construction, Leq would be approximately the following: Activity Clearing Excavation Foundations Building Construction Finishing Lea On decibels J 71-72 59-77 65 60-72 62-77 Long-term impacts would be those associated with the increase in site users. Additional traffic would be generated by future uses. The Increase in noise would be typical of a slngle-family residential development of this size and would be considered minima/. Sound levels for various noise sourr:es include: Noise Sources Automobile Starting Closlng car Door Loud Voices Automobile/Truck Traffic Sound Level at . 100 feet fdBA I 50-55 50-55 50 50 3. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction activities will be petformed during normal daytime working hours and compliant with the rules and regulations set forth by King County. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE. a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Both properties are vacant and undeveloped. The following is the known current uses of the adjacent properties: • North • South • East • West Single-famlly residences Single-family residences Single-family residence Single-family residences b. Has the site been used for agricultural purposes? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Again, there is a single-family residence with associated outbuildings present on the property. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? . Not applicable. e. What is the current zoning of the site? The current zoning is single family resident/a/ R-6 (6 units per acre). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan designation is urban residentia~ medium (Single Family, 4-12 units per acre). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program environment designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. As stated previously, there is an existing wetland and stream on this . particular property. (Please see the Critical Areas Determination Report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.) i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Based on a household occupancy rate of 2.92 people per single- family residence, it Is expected that approximately 26 new people will reside in the eight (8) new residences. J. Proposed measures to reduce displacement impacts, if any? None are proposed at this time. k. What are the proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed 8-lot short subdivision with single-famlly residences is consistent with recent and existing development In the area, current zoning, and comprehensive plan designations. The project w/11 be compllant with the County Code. BVALUATION FOil AGBNCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT 9. HOUSING. a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is expected that the project will provide up to 8 new single-family residential units In the middle income level b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or .control housing impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 10. AESTHETICS. a. What is the tallest height of ariy proposed structure(s) not including antennas; what is the principal exterior buiiding material(s) proposed? The County's zoning code restricts the building heights of single- family residential structures to 35'. Exterior materials will typically consist of wood or hardy backer type siding with brick, rock, or shingle accents. Specific materials wlll be detel1Tllned by the home builder at the time of building pel1Tllt and will comply with app//cable County regulations. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any? None are proposed at this time. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE. a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? EVALUATION POR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Light and/or glare would occur primarily during evening and night time hours and would be limited to any new street lights, house lights, . and minima/ security lighting potentially within the park spaces. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your project? None. d. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 12. RECREATION. a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Maplewood Golf Course and Ron Regis Park are approximately 3.3miles north of the site. Another golf course, Fairwood Golf and Country Club, is approximately 2.1 ml/es to the east of this project. A bit closer, also to the east, is Renton Park along J 3d" A venue SE. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The project is proposing to construct an on-site park area to serve the new residents. A development of this size {8 lots) requires 3,120 square feet (8 times 390 square feet) of recreation space which will be provided on-site. EVALUATION POR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION. a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on the site. None are known. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 14. TRANSPORTATION. a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any: Both portions of this project are immediately accessible to SE 1 Bd" Street and 1 Bd" A venue SE, connecting to SE 17ff" Street (Petrovitsky}, which connects directly to SR 167 and SR 405. (Please see Preliminary Plat for proposed access point). b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. The nearest pub/le bus access Is at the intersection of 11 ff" Avenue SE and SE 17ff" Street, which Is approximately one-half mile northwest of this project (Bus Route 155). c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Assuming a minimum of 4 parking spaces per household (2-car garage and a 2-car driveway}, there will be at least 32 new parking spaces provided upon completion of this development. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or street, or improvements to any existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Frontage improvements to both SE 18cf' Street and 118"' Avenue SE will likely be required. Will the project use or occur in the immediate vicinity of water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Based on the !TE Manua~ there will be approximately 80 net new tips per day generated by this project. Peak volumes would most likely occur during typical rush hour times of 7:00 -9:00 AM and 4:00 -6:00 PM and would add approximately 8 net new AM peak and PM peak hour trips. g. What are proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The applicant will be responsible for appropriate traffic mitigation fees, which will offset some of the impacts of the subdivision. Other mitigation includes the construction of new roads to serve the project. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES. a. Would the project result in an increase need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes. There would be a minimal increased need for fire and police protection due to an additional 8 new lots in the area. Also, there will be a minima! Impact on the present school system. b. What are proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: Propetty taxes, building permits and school Impact mitigation fees generated from these residences are expected to mitigate impacts incurred from this development. EVALUATION POR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLI.CANT 17. UTILITIES. a. Circle (underline) utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, · refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: cable television. b. Describe the utilities which are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity: Gas: Water: Refuse: Telephone: sewer: cable: Puget Sound Energy Puget Sound Energy Soos Creek Water District Waste Management Qwest Communications Soos Creek Sewer District Comcast Connection(s) to the above mentioned utilities will be negotiated with the individual purveyor during the building permit and construction phases of this project. There may also be a need for a right-of-way permit(s) to gain access to the property at construction. There may also be a need to extend an 8-inch or greater line (water and/or sewer) that will be determined at final engineering approval by the utility purveyor. C. SIGNATURE. The above answers are true to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Agent for the Applicant: ------------ Date Submitted: --------- EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY WILSON-TRAN 8-LOT SHORT PLAT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (619660-0520) LOT 8, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNlY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE SOUTH 90 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET THEREOF. (619660-0540) LOT 9, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNlY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE WEST 375 FEET. MapQuest: Maps, Addresses, Business Directory & Satellite Photos --- 17844 120th Ave Se Renton WA 98058-6648 us Notes: Only text visible within note field will print. ' > :~, I," (¥'p 1 . ,,·. ~i~. ·:.~, , 0 .. ,.· }l -~:' >" .;;, ,, ;,•-_ save<lnld Se,nd maps. ariij•cfirections ,to;yout,mol:nle,phone· -~:- '·) ,.,, ;,,>" ·,\{, ;, ··e •·f, ]j'it>Nowl ' ', C' '•,J• /I .° ~. ; .. :,~ ~~c.-r·: . , . .. . , "'.>IT6. > ,_7.1. " ,'.· ., • '· Ji, ' .. ,,~. ,:: /:~·~;1~; '''· ., '; ' ' ' .:.\ ,J) ., ' G <> •; D ,, ",>l," ' , II '.~ "'·~ ·_;,,:.,..,~ .... ~- ' :i',t-,• " '~1 ( '.-.:" ',-"·- • . ... "b All rlahts reserved, use Subiect to Llcense/Coovdaht Page I of I This map Is Informational only, No representation Is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and Its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. http://www.mapquest.corn/maps/print.adp?mapdata=p5kqyoo6yZK6LfzObzPBTCoEK3raj .. . 2/28/2008 Section I: Buildings Service ............................................... . Warehouse and Stora e .................... . Other ........................................... , ...... . Vacant ................................................ . Section II: Pavement ........................ .. Pavement. ........................................... . Version 1. 7 12126/07 Square Feet (in thousands of 2,550.00 Total Project Emissions: Emissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet MTC02e Embodied 98 33 357 54 681 41 475 39 646 39 1,541 39 1,994 39 1,938 39 737 39 777 39 577 247 39 723 588 39 733 150 39 899 374 39 339 129 39 599 266 39 352 181 39 1,278 257 39 162 47 127500 139995! Sources: 1 ., Residential Commercial Definition of Bulldinn T"-eS Type (Residential) or Principal Activity Commercial' Descr1otlon Unless otherwise specified, this includes both attached and detached Sinole-Famllv Home .................................. buildlnos Multi-FamilvUnll In Laroe Buildino ........... Aoartments in bulldlnas with more than 5 units Multl-FamilvUnlt in Small Bulldlria ........... Aoartments In bulldina with 2-4 units Mobile Home ............................................. Buildings used for academic or technical classroom Instruction, such as elementary, middle, or high schools, and classroom buildings on college or university campuses. Buildings on education campuses for which the main use is not classroom are Included In the category relating to their use. For example, administration buildings are part of ·office," dormitories are Education .................................................. "Lodaina," and libraries are "Public Assemblv." Food Sales ............................................... Bulldinas used for retail or wholesale of food. Food Service ............................................ Buildings used for preparation and sale of food and beverages f~r consumntion. Health Care lnnatlent ................................ Buildfnns used as diaanostic and treatment facilities for lnoatlent care. Buildings used as diagnostic and treatment facilities for outpatient care. Doctor's or dentist's office are Included here if they use any type of diagnostic Health Care Outnatlent ............................. medical eauloment /If thev do not, thev are cat=orized as an office buildlnal. Buildings used to offer multiple accommodations for short-term or long-term Lodaina ..................................................... residents, includinn skilled nursina and other residentlal care buildinas. Retail/Other Than Malll. ........................... Buildinns used for the sale and disrlav of noods other than food. Buildings used for general office space, professional office. or administrative offices. Doctor's or dentist's office are Included here if they do not use any type af diagnostic medical equipment (if they do, they are categorized as an Office ........................................................ outnoUent health care buildlna\. Buildings In which people gather for social or recreatlonal activities, whether In Public Assemblv ....................................... orlvate or non-orivate meetino halls. Public Order and Safelv ........................... Bulldlnas used for the oreservation of law and order or ni •bllc safetv. Buildings In which people gather for religious activities, (such as chapels, Rellaious Worshia .................................... churches, mo .. ,.,ues, svna,.,,.=ues, and temoles\. Buildings In which some type of service is provided, other than food service or Service ...................................................... retail sales of noods Buildings used lo store goods, manufactured products, merchandise, raw Warehouse and Storane .......................... materials, or nersonal belorn::iinas (such as self-storaae). Buildings that are industrial or agrlcultural with some retail space; buildings having several different commercial activities that, together, comprise 50 percent or more of the floorspace, but whose largest single activity is agricultural, industrial/ manufacturing, or resfdential; and all other Other ......................................................... mlscella·neous buildlnns that do not fit Into anv other cateoorv. Buildings In which more floorspace was vacant than was used for any single commerclal activity at the time of interview. Therefore, a vacant building may Vacant ...................................................... have some occuoied floorsn~ce. 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.ela.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqft-measure.html Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS), Description of CBECS Building Types http://www.ela.doe.gov/emeulcbecs/pba99/bldgtypes.html AvsageGwP (lbsC02o'sqft):V~ • .... _. __ Average Mauiriall In a 2,.272-squantfoal homo MTC02o -All date in blloek text Resldent181 ~ per unit ~ce per buildlng Average GWP {lbs C02dq ft): Vanco.r,,er. Low RIM Bullding Average l.1aterials in 1 2.m.square ftJot single family home A~&qt,..;!e.f; ... :,!7~ Embodied EmlUlons Woritsheet s.etlon ·~ ........ Life span nil8ted u. span ""8ted oni>odied embodlod GHG GHG rnls$lons (MTC02el': missions (MTC02el' lt1CUsand squ.ar9 feet) • s.e: unit c:alc:Ulaticrl$ in table below' .. 39 33 39 .. 39 -l'GN.--·-... -· --··· ... ·--···-' 1.Ubl 411 39 Education ...................... -...................... 1 25.6 I ·991r-::~ · 39 Food s.tes-: ....................................... I 5.6 I -· · 2111 39 r:5E9:~::::::::::::::::::::~:::~:1 ··--;~!:: I 9c· E Retall (O!ner Than Mall). ........................ . ~:~ I ·;·~r·· : Offlce ·-···········-·---··--···-·········--·-··--~ ~~T--~I : Pubic Order and -1 ....................... .. 15.51 soo1-· 39 R!!':t!n Worship. --··-·-·····-·--· sen,tce --·-···················-······-······--··· w-.. ... 1~:! r·-~~1 = 16.9 654 .. 39 Other ···············-·····-·····-·-···· 21.9C MBI 39 Vacant ..................... -·--' 14.1 j 546} 39 Sec:tlon a: P~ ··-··-· j All T'fP!! crt Pa-..nent. ................. . -Cdwnn, "" """"' -. ..... w ... ., 7.8 19.1 o.o 2Wl.O 3206.0 0.0 8.0 King Colrily, ONRP. Coruet: M.u KiAlaric. ~kingcounty.go,, 2001 ReSidlW'tbal Enetgy Ccnsurnptlan S1Ney (National AV1nQ8. 2001) Square loo!age measumnent3 aod comparisoos http://www.ela.doo.~emeu/ro::afsqft~ 27.8 ELA. 2003 Commercial 8u!ldlngs Eoc,gy Consumption ~ (National A-..ge. 2003) ~ -512 ~li5.Ct 6.6 Table C1 Coreumption and Gross Energy Intensity for Sum of Mazor F1.>e!a tor Non-Mall ButldingS, 2003 trttp:J,-_.ela.doe.gov/emeufcbecslcbecs2003'detailed_ tab1es _20031200l$et9/2003exceticJ.xls """"' ""'°"""""" Alhena Assembly Evaluation Tool v2.~ Vancouver Low Rise Building AQembly A....-.ge GWP (kg) per squa:re meter hUp;/,_~~html Lbs per kg 2.20 Squara feet per sciu-meter 10.76 Bu!ldings Energy Date Book; 7 .3 T ypleal{Average Househod Materia13 U1ec1 In Ule ConstNa1on of• 2.272-Sq~ Single-Family Home. 2000 http://buUdlngsdatabook.eren.doo.gov/?ldt<vleW_book_table&Tableto-2036&~ See also: NAHB. 2004 Housing Facts, Figun,s and Trends, Feb. 2004. p. 7, E.t\.t<'".{/ ltth:.t'l'l"'-Ot,o-, A.Jmll'!~C;'lt!nr.:"H..'"lli:.i:'"'9 ,:1v1r.:i=tct;: ~ !•)'.).;, Arn:ior,d,1 e., C"U!il't;.-d l~ Dr..1. Fog 15. ti.::i~·,~-~9.d.ti-;!"·i,::...ief«w"",vr,iptiOt'~'r~.Mer>t:al!r,cq1-~.IY.lf -w ... -5.7 21.3 T"' TOCOI----(MTC02ef 6050.0 3103.0 tMTC02e -··-1~6 30.0 88.0 38.7 i>,"'8flllmt Emls$10fl'S FilCWs l/!TC02etthousal'ld square-feet of asphalt or ccm:rani pavelfl9fll Embodied GHG Embl1ion1 BuOdings 50 !sn below} Wodslhaet Backamund lnfonnatlon Embodied GHG emissions are emlsslons that are created through the extraction, processtng, transportation, construction and dlSposal of buUding materials as well as emlsslons Cf9ated through landscape disturbance (by both sou disturbance and changes In aboVe ground biomass). Estimating embodied GHG emiSSIOns is new fiekt of analySls; the estimates are rapidly Improving end becoming more inclusive of all elements of construction and development. The estimate Included In this worksheet Is calculated using average values fOf' the main construction materials that are used to create a typk:al family home. In 2004. the NatlonaJ Assoc::latlon of Home BuDcters calculated the average materials that are used in a typical 2,2n squaru foot single-family househOld. The quantity of materials used is then multiplied by the average GHG emfSSIOns associated with the Dfe-cycle GHG emlSSions for each material. This estimate Is a rough and conservative estimate; the actual embodied emissions for a project eru lllcety to be higher. For example, et thfs stage, due to a leek of comprehensive data, the estimate does not lndude Important factors such u landscape disturbance or the emlssions assoclatad wtth the lntertor components of a building (such es furniture). King County reattzes that the ealeulations for embodied emtssions tn this worttsheet are rough. For example, the amlsslons associated with building 1,000 SQuare feet of a residential buDdlng wUI not be the same as 1,000 squaru feet of a commercial building. However, discussions wtth the construction community Indicate that whUe there are significant differences between the dtfferent types of structures. this method of estimation is reasonable; It will be Improved es mom data become available. Additionally, If more spedfic lnfonnatlon about the project Is known, King County recommends two onllne embodied emlsslons calculators that can be used to obtain a more taHorecl estimate for embodied emissions: WWW buildcarbonoeutral grp and www.athenasm1 caAA91slefc9Ca!culirtor/. Pavement Four recent life cycle assessments of the environmental Impacts of roads form the basis for the per unit embodied emissions of pavement. Each study Is constructed In sltghtly different ways: however, the aggregate results of the reports represent a reasonable estimate of the GHG emissions that am created from the manufacture of paving matertals. construction raleted emlSSlons. and maintenance of the pavement over Its expected life cycle. For specifics. see the worksheet. Se,cial Section' Estfmatjng the Embodied Emissions for Pavement Four recent Ufe cycle assessments of the environmental lmpactS of roads fonn the basis for the per unit embodied emissions of pavement. Each study is constructed ln slightly different ways; however, the aggregate results of the reports represent a reasonable estimate of the GHG emissions that are created from the manufacture of paving materials, construcoon related emissions, and maintenance of the pavement over Its expected life cycle. The results of the studies· are presented In different units and measures; considerable effort was undertak.en to be able to compare the rusults of the studies in a reasonable way. For more detaHs about the below methodology, contact matt.kuhar1c@klngcounty.gov. The four studies. Men (2001), Park (2003), Strlpple (2001) and Treolar (2001) produced total GHG emissions of 4-34 MTC02e per thousand square feet of finished paving (for similar asphalt and concrete based pavements). This estimate does not lnduding downstream maintenance and repair of the highway. The awrage (for aD concrete and asphalt pavements in the s!udies, assuming each study gets one da1a point) is -17 MTC02e/thousancl square feet. Three of the studies attempted to thoroughly account for the emissions associated with long tenn maintenance (40 years) of the roads. Strippte (2001 ), Peril et al. (2003) end Treolar (2001) report 17, 81, and 68 MTC02e/thousand square feet. respectively, aflBr accounting for maintenance of the roads. Based on the above discussion, King County makes the conservative estimate that 50 MTC02e/thousand square feet of pavement (over the developmenfs life cycle) will be used as the embodied emission factor for pavement until better estlma1es can be obtained. This Is roughly equivalent to 3,500 MTC02e per lane mile of road {assuming the lane Is 13 feet wide). It is important to note that these studies estimate the embodied emissions for roads. Paving that does not need to stand up to the rigor.1 of heavy use (such as pari(lng lots or driveways) would likely use less matertals and hence have iower embodied emissions. l>o!I= MeD, J. A Ufa Cycle Perspective on Concrete and Asphalt Roadways: Embodied Primary Energy and Global Wanring Potential. 2006. Available: http·ttwm,, cementca/cement-nsfleee9ec7bbd630126852566c400S2107b/Sec79dc8ae03a 782852572h90061 b9 14/SflLEIATTKOWE31athena%20reoort%20Feb-%202%2Q2007.pdf Park, K, Hwang, y .• Seo. S., M.ASCE. and Seo. H. ' "Quantltatfw Assessment of Environmental Impacts on Ufa Cyde of Highways," Jouma1 of Construction Engineering and Management , Vol 129, Janua,y/Febnwy 2003, pp 25-31, (DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0~2003)129:1(25)). Stripple, H. Life C}Qe Assessment of Roact. A Pilot Study for Inventory Analysis. Second Revised Edition. M Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd. 2001. Avallable: http·//wyNI M sefrRppmter/pdf/8121QE.odf Treloar, G., Low, P.E.O., and Crawford, R.H. Hybrid l..mK'.;ycle Inventory for Road Construction and Use. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. P. 43-49. January/February 2004. c.nernu c.m1ssinns Yll'Orl'.5m:,er Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial Sinale-Familv Home .............................. Multl-Familv Unit in Lama Buildinn ....... Multl-Familv Unit In Small BuildinR ....... Mobile Horne .•..•.•...•.•••.•.•..•.••.•.•..•.•.••...•• Education •..•......•..........•........................ Food Sales ...............•.....•....•...............•. Food Service .............•.........•................. Health Care lnn::tflAnt ............•..•....•.•..•.• Health Care r 11 "",,.,.ent ......................... Lodaina .............................•................... Retail tattler Than Malll. .•.•.•................• Office ..................•.......•...•....•.•......••.....• PubJlc Assemi...i. .................................... PubJlc Order and S::n,uv ........................ Rellnlous Worshlo ................................. Service .•..•...•......................................... Warehouse and Storaae ....................... Other .......................................••....••...•.• Vacant ......•.............•.....•..................•....• li2l!Im AU data In black text Energy consumption for residential buildings Energy consumption for commercial buildings and Floorspace per building Carbon Coefficient for Buildings Residential floorspace per unit EnergJ Floorspace MTCEper consumption pei Cart>on per Building thousand MTC02eper building per iear Coefficient for MTC02eper (thousand square feet per thousand square (million Btu Bulldinas build Ina per ""'::ar o:nuare feet -·· feetnPr.a::a 107.3 0.108 11.61 2.53 4.6 16.8 41.0 0.108 4.44 0.85 5.2 19.2 78.1 0.108 8.45 1.39 6.1 22.2 75.9 0.108 8.21 1.06 7.7 28.4 2.125.0 0.124 264.2 25.6 10.3 37.8 1,110.0 0.124 138.0 5.6 24.6 90.4 1,436.0 0.124 178.5 5.6 31.9 116.9 60,152.0 0.124 7,479.1 241.4 31.0 113.6 985.0 0.124 122.5 10.4 11.8 43.2 3,578.0 0.124 444.9 35.8 12.4 45.6 720.0 0.124 89.5 9.7 9.2 33.8 1,376.0 0.124 171.1 14.8 11.6 42.4 1,338.0 0.124 166.4 14.2 11.7 43.0 1,791.0 0.124 222.7 15.5 14.4 52.7 440.0 0.124 54.7 10.1 5.4 19.9 501.0 0.124 62.3 6.5 9.6 35.1 764.0 0.124 95.0 16.9 5.6 20.6 3,600.0 0.124 447.6 21.9 20.4 74.9 294.0 0.124 36.6 14.1 2.6 9.5 Kfng County. ONRP. Contact: Matt Kuharic, matt.kuharic@klngcounty.gov 2007 Buildings Energy Data Book: 6.1 Quad Definitions and Comparisons (National Average, 2001} Table 6.1.4: Average Annual Carbon Dioxide Emissions for Various Functions http://buildlngsdatabook.eren.doe.gov/ Data also at http://www.e!a.doe.gov/emeu/recs/recs2001_ce/ce1-4c_housingunits2001.html EIA, 2003 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2003) Table C3. Consumption and Gross Energy Intensity for Sum of Major Fuels for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003 http:f/www.ela.doe.gov/emeufcbecstcbecs2003/detailed _tables_ 2003/2003set9/2003excel/c3. xis Average Lifespan Energ) Building Life Related MTC02e S=n emissions "'"'f unit 57.9 672 80.5 357 80.5 681 57.9 475 62.5 16.528 62.5 8,632 62.5 11,168 62.5 487,794 62.5 7,660 62.5 27,826 62.5 5,599 62.5 10,701 62.5 10,405 62.5 13,928 62.5 3,422 62.5 3.896 62.5 5,942 62.5 27,997 62.5 2,286 Note: Data in plum color is found in both of the above sources (buildings energy data book and commercial buildings energy consumption survey). Buildings Energy Data Book (National average, 2005) Table 3.1. 7. 2005 Carbon Dioxide Emission Coefficients for Buildings (MMTCE per Quadriilion Btu) http:!/buiidingsdatabook. eere.energy .govi?!O=-view _book_ table& T abielD=-2057 Note: Carbon coefficient in the Energy Data book is in ~HCE per Quadrillion Btu. To convert to MTC02e per million Btu. this factor was divided by 1000 and multiplied by 44/12 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2001) Square footage measurements and comparisons http://wwN.ela.doe.gov/emeulrecs/sqft-measure.html Lifespan Energy Related MTC02e emissions per thousand SQuare feet 266 422 489 448 646 1,541 1,994 1.938 737 777 577 723 733 899 339 599 352 1,278 162 average lief span of buildings, estimated by replacement time method Single Faml~ Multi-Family Units All Residential Homes in Large and BuDdlngs Small Buildinas New Housing Construction, 2001 1,273,000 329.000 1,602,000 Existing Housing Stoel<. 2001 73,700,000 26.500.000 100,200,000 (national Repla-~:;~ 57.9 80.5 62.5 average. 2001) Note:-Single family homes calculation is used for moblle homes as a best estimate life span. Note: At this time, KC staff could find no reliable data for the average life span of commercial buildings. Therefore, the average life span of resldentlal bulldings Is being used until a better approximation can be aSC8rtalned. SOU!a!S: NewHouSiog Construction, 2001 Quarterly Starts and Completions by Purpose and Design -US and Regions (Excel) http;/lwww.census.gov/const/quarterly_starts_completions_cust.xls See also; http:llwww.cent.us.gov/consttwww/newresca;nstJndex.html Existing Housing Stock, 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) 2001 Tables HC1 :Housing Unit Characteristics. Mi Ill on U.S. Households 2001 Table HC14a. Housing Unit Characteristics by Type of Housing Unit Million U.S. Households. 2001 Mllllon U.S. Households, 2001 http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recslrecs2001/hc_pdf/housunlts/hc14a_housingunlts2001.pdf I IClll.:t lldUUII CIIII-\All;j VVUJJl.:::ifletll Type (Residential) or Principal Activity ICornmert:ial Sinale-FamUv Home .................................. Multi-F untt In I Rrr e BulldlnR ........... Multi-Familv Unit In Small Bulldlna ........... Mobile Horne ............................................ Education ............••...•.............................. Food Sales .............................................. Food Service ........................................... Health care ln"""'lf>,nt ............................... Health care r .n nn::.itlent ........................•... Lodaina .........••••....................•.....•••••........ Retail lOther Than Mall\ ............................ Office ..............•....•....................••.•.........•• Public Assem"'tu ...................................... Public Order and Safetv ........................... Relicious Worshlo .................................... Service .................................................... Warehouse and Stora ................................ Other .•.........................••••••...................... Vacant ...............................•..................... Sources All data in black text # people/ unit Residential floorspace per unit # employees/thousand square feet vehicle related GHG emissions MTC02e/ # people or (metric toMes year/ # thousand employees/ C02eper thousand # people/ unit or sq feet/ unit thousand person per MTC02e/ square buildinc or buildinc ..,.,uare feet year vear/ unit feet 2.8 2.53 1.1 4.9 13.7 5.4 1.9 0.85 2.3 4.9 9.5 11.2 1.9 1.39 1.4 4.9 9.5 6.8 2.5 1.06 2.3 4.9 12.2 11.5 30.0 25.6 1.2 4.9 147.8 5.8 5.1 5.6 0.9 4.9 25.2 4.5 10.2 5.6 1.8 4.9 50.2 9.0 455.5 241.4 1.9 4.9 2246.4 9.3 19.3 10.4 1.9 4.9 95.0 9.1 13.6 35.8 0.4 4.9 67.1 1.9 7.6 9.7 0.8 4.9 36.3 3.9 28.2 14.8 1.9 4.9 139.0 9.4 6.9 14.2 0.5 4.9 34.2 2.4 18.8 15.5 1.2 4.9 92.7 6.0 4.2 10.1 0.4 4.9 20.8 2.1 5.6 6.5 0.9 4.9 27.6 4.3 9.9 16.9 0.6 4.9 49.0 2.9 18.3 21.9 0.8 4.9 90.0 4.1 2.1 14.1 0.2 4.9 10.5 0.7 King County, ONRP. Contact: Matt Kuharic, matt.kuharic@kingcounty.gov Estimating Household Size for Use in Population Estimates (WA state, 2000 average) Washington State Office of Financial Management Kimpel, T. and Lowe, T. Research Brief No. 47. August 2007 http://www.ofm.wa.gov/researchbriefs/brtef047.pdf Average Building Life Soan 57.9 80.5 80.5 57.9 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Note: This analysJs combines Multi Unit Structures In both large and small units into one category: the average is used In this case although there is likely a difference 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2001) Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqft-measure.html Life span transportation related GHG emissions (MTC02e/ oer unit 792 786 786 709 9247 1579 3141 140506 5941 4194 2394 8696 2137 5796 1298 1729 3067 5630 657 Coffimercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey commercial energy uses and costs (National Median, 2003) Table B2 Totals and Medians or Floorspace. Number of Workers, and Hours of Operation for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003 http://www.eia.doe.gov!emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed_tables_2003/2003set1i2003exceVb2.xls Note. Data for# employees/thousand square feet is presen!ed by CBECS as square feet/employee. Life span transportation related GHG emissions (MTC02e/ thousand sq feet 313 904 550 666 361 262 561 562 571 117 247 568 150 374 129 266 181 257 47 lo this analysis employees/thousand square feet is calculated by tak.ing the inverse or the CBECS number and multiplying by 1000. vehicle related GHG emissions Estimate calculated as follows (Washington state, 2006)_ 56,531,930,000 2006 Annual WA State Vehicle Miles Traveled Data was daily VMT. Annual VMT was 365*daily VMT. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/mapsdataltdo/annualmileage.htm 6,395,798 2006 WA state population http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/53000.html 8839 vehicle miles per person per year 0.0506 gallon gasoline/mile This Is the weighted national average fuel efficiency for all cars and 2 axle, 4 wheel light trucks In 2005. This includes pickup trucks, vans and SUVs. The 0.051 gallons/mile used here is the inverse of the more commonly known term ·mnestper gallon· (which is 19.75 for these cars and light trucks). Transportation Energy Data Book. 26th Edition. 2006. Chapter 4; Ught Vehicles and Characteristics. Calculations based on weighted average MPG efficiency of cars and light trucks. http://cta. oml. gov /data/tedb26/Edition26 _ Chapter04. pdf Note: This report states that in 2005. 92.3% of all highway VMT were driven by the above described vehicles. http://cta.oml.gov/datalledb26/Spreadsheets/Table3_04.xls 24.3 lbs C02e/gaUon gasoline The CO2 emissions estimates for gasoline and diesel include the extraction, transport, and refinement of petroleum as well as their combustion. Life-Cycle CO2 Emissions for Various New Vehlcies. RENew Northfield. Available: http://renewnorthfield.org/WpcontenVuploads/2006/04/C02%20emlsslons.pdl Note: This is a conservative estimate of emissions by fuel consumption because diesel fuel, 2205 with a emissions factor of 26.55 lbs C02e/gallon was not estimated. 4.93 lbs/metric tonne vehicle related GHG emissions {metric tonnes C02e per person per year) average lief span of buildings, estimated by replacement time method See Energy Emissions Worksheet for Calculations Commercial floorspace per unit EIA, 2003 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2003) Table C3. Consumption and Gross Energy Intensity for Sum of Major Fuels for Non·Mall Buildings. 2003 http://www.ela.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed_tables_2003/200~set9/2003eKceUc3.xls TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USB ONLY ® King County· State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 ITY 206-296-7217 Purpose of the checklist The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW Chapter 43.21 C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for the applicants This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checkl.ist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations such as zoning, shoreline and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining ifthere may be significant adverse impacts. {m~©~OW~@ FEB 2 9 2008 . K.C. D.D.E.S. TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT A. BACKGROUND. I. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Wilson 8-Lot Short Plat 2. Names of Applicant: Ed Wilson and Nahn Busse/le, husband and wife, Brenda Tran 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owners/Applicant: OwnersiAppllcant: Agent: 4. Date checklist prepared: February 28, 2008 5. Agency requesting checklist: Ed Wilson and Nahn Busse/le 12029 SE 17/f' Street Renton, WA 98058 Brenda Tran 12029 SE 17ff" Street Renton, WA 98058 PK Enterprises 23035 SE 265'1 Street Maple Valley, WA 98038 (206) 227.7445 Contact: Mr. Phillip Kitzes EVALUATION POR AGENCY USB ONLY King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, Land Use Service Division 6. Proposed project timing or schedule (include phasing, if applicable): Upon application being deemed complete: Checklist Review: 1-3 months Lend Use Review/Hearing: 6-8 months Engineering Review/Permitting: 4-6 .months Plat Construction: 2-3 months Home construction is expected to begin In the Summer of 2009 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time. TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. • Level 1 Downstream Analysis prepared by Preferred Engineers, LLC, • Critical Areas Determination Report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. • Addendum (Critica/Areas Determination Report) prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. • Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc. 9. Do you know of pending applications for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None are known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposals, if known. • Preliminary/Final Short Plat Review • SEPA Review • Final Engineering Review (County and Utility District) • Right-of-Way Agreements/Utility Easements (Bonneville Power and others) • NPDES Permit (storm water) • Corp of Engineers Permit (possible) • Forest Practice Permit (possible) 11. Give a complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in the checklist which ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is a 8-Lot short subdivision located on a 2.57-acre site. The current zoning Is R-6; thus, there is a potential for 15 lots/residences allowed on the property. A majority of the property Is In sensitive areas (a wetland and stream) and their associated buffers which reduces the amount of bui/dable land on the properties. The minimum lot size is 3,600 square feet (40' x 901. Sufficient area is provided for recreation on-site, while the proposed storm water pond will be located off-site (easement required-same ownership). Direct access will come from 111/h Avenue SE (2 Jots) and SE 180th Street (6 lots)- frontage Improvements on both roadways is required. Water (12-inch main) and sewer (minimum 8-inch main) will be extended to the project with approvals from Soos Creek (purveyor). 12. Location of the proposal. Please give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your project, including street address, if any. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, please provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Please provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if possible. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to the checklist. {Indicate if maps or plans have been submitted as part of a permit application). TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT BVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USB ONLY The properties are vacant and there is no address available. Again, one property (Tran) is accessible from 11£1" Avenue SE and the Assessor's Parcel Number is 619660-0520. The second property (Wilson and Busse/le) is served from SE 1Bd" Street and the Assessor's Parcel Number is 619660-0540. Both properties are located within the Northwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington. (Please see enclosed vicinity map and legal descriptions.) B. ENVffiONMENTAL ELEMENTS. 1. Earth. a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other ______ _ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent of slope): n,e site generally slopes in a northeasterly direction with the steepest slope on site being an isolated area with 10-15 percent downward gradient slope. c. What general types of soil are found on the site ( for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, please specify and note any prime farmland. n,e soils onsite consist of Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam {AgB and AgC} and Seattle Muck (Sk) soils according to the National Resources Conservation Service Survey. {Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. n,ere are no known surface indications of unstable soils on, or in the Immediate vidnity of the proposed site location. {Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) e. Describe the purposes, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading will be limited to the construction of the proposed road and access tract, lots, water, sewer, other utilities, recreation areas, and the proposed detention fadlity. There will be approximately 3,000 cubic yards of cut and fill within this project. n,e project will attempt to balance the amount of cut and fill so that no additional import or export of material should be necessary. If any import or export of material necessary for this project it will be approved at TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT final engineering and obtained from or deposited to a County approved site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion could occur during clearing and grading operations associated with this project. To minimize the impacts of the project, appropriate erosion control measures will be reviewed and approved by the County prior to construction activity associated with this project. (Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The total lot area is roughly 111,829 square feet. The area within the public road to be constructed is 2,550 square feet---0ff-site (within existing right-of-way). With approximately 33,678 square feet in the lots and assuming a maximum 55% impervious surface per lot (Code}, there is a total of 18,523 square feet additional impervious surface. Thus, the total new impervious surface area is 21,073 square feet, or 19 percent of the entire site. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction, various measures are expected to be used to control erosion. These methods include construction during the dry season, the use of sllt fences and hay bails, and revegetation of disturbed areas. Specific temporary erosion and sediment control measures will be reviewed and approved by the County prior to construction. (Please see Report of Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Soils and Environmental Engineers, Inc.) 2. AIR. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke, greenhouse gases) during construction, and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Temporary emmissions (i.e. dust, vehicle related, etc.) from equipment will occur during the construction phase of this project. Upon completion, there will be additional emmisssions from the residences (fireplaces) and residents (automotive, etc.). {Please see enclosed worksheet for green house gases provided by the County.) b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor which may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLBTED BY APPLICANT Other-than the existing residences and vehicular movements along SE· 18d" Street and 11!!' Avenue SE, there are none to our knowledge. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts, if any: Construction equipment wll/ comply with applicable air quality regulations, as prescribed by the County, State and Federal regulations. Dust emissions will be controlled during site construction by the use of best management practices, including periodic watering of disturbed areas. The project will not rely upon wood burning fireplaces as the primary sourr:e of heat for the new homes. All new homes will use natural gas and/or electricity to provide heat, reducing emissions caused by wood burning fires. 3. WATER. a. Surface: I) Is there any surface water on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, associated wetland)? If yes, describe type, provide names, and, if known, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. On-site, there is an existing wetland (Wetland AB) and stream (seasonal tributary) on. the project site. Also, there ere several wetlands end streams off-site of this property-including a portion of Big Soos Creek. (For a complete listing of the surface water bodies, please see report prepared by Ecological Land Services, lnc.-- includes location end type.) 2) Will the project require any work over or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The entire development is within 200 feet of these water bodies; thus, construction activity will occur within 200 feet of said waters. It may be necessary to extend water (12-inch) and sewer (8-inch minimum) through portions of the buffers to serve the development-both on-and off-site. (Please see enclosed water and sewer analysis from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District.) In addition, it may be necessary to extend other utilities within these same sensitive areas. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate source of fill materials. BVALUATIO!I FOR AGB!ICY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT At this time, there is no proposed filling or dredging being proposed to construct the development. However, there may be a need for dredging end/or filling based on the design of Soos Creek Weter and Utility District for water and sewer extensions onto the project site end/or from adjacent properties. If required, the source of fill would be manufactured on-site with native soils. 4) Will surface water withdrawals or diversions be required by the proposal? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a I 00-year floodplain? Note location on the site plan, if any. Not to our knowledge. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn or recharged? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste water material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): I) Describe the source of runoff and storm water and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will the water flow into other waters? If so, please describe. EVALUATION POR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Storm water runoff from road improvements and residences will be collected via a series of connected pipes to be ultimately discharged into an off-site water quality/detention facility. This facility would be for water quality purposes only. Once treated, the water will be discharged at the lowest natural point, to the existing stream channel--Big Soos Creek. (Please see Drainage Report and Conceptual Drainage Plan prepared by Preferred Engineering, LLC). 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. The proposal includes a water quality treatment component to the pond that will filter out contaminants prior to entering ground and/or surface waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: All development and engineering requirements imposed by the County to control the impacts to the hydrology of the area will be performed by the proponent These include design of the stormwater facilities pursuant to the 2005 KCSWDM. 4. PLANTS. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ...1QL deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: cottonwood ...1QL evergreen tree: fu:, cedar, pine, other: ...1QL shrubs: ...1QL grass ...1QL pasture crop or grain ...1QL wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other: salmonberry water plants: water lily, eelgrass, mil foil, other other types of vegetation {For a complete list of wet soil/water flora, please see report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Vegetation for the road improvements and residences will be removed. In addition, there may be the need to remove vegetation EVALUATION FOR AGBNCY UBB ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT with the wetland/stream buffers for utilities requiring a mitigation plan. c. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on near the site. None, to our knowledge. d. List proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The development will have a park area that will be planted according to an approved landscape plan prepared during the final engineering phase. In doing so, the developer will be compliant with the existing codes and regulations required by the County with respect to preservance or enhancement of existing vegetation on the site. 5. ANIMALS. a. Circle (underline) any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or. are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ____ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: rodents Fish: bass, salmon, trout, shellfish, other: ____ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None are proposed at this time .. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES. a. What kinds of energy ( electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrfdty and/or natural gas will be used to meet the project's energy needs for light and heat. EVALUATION POR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List any other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Construction of the new homes will meet or exceed the necessary energy requirements of the Northwest Energy Code, the 2005 International Building Code, and those additionally adopted by the County. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. a. Are there any environmental health hazards, exposure to toxic chemicals, including risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. I. Describe Special Emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are proposed at this time. b. Noise. I. What type of noise exists in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing vehicular traffic along SE 18<1' Streat and 11fih Avenue SE. 2. What types of levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during site development Construction would occur primarily during the daylight hours, and in compliance with all EVALUATION FOR AGENCY UaB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT applicable codes. Heavy equipment, hand tools, and the transporting of construdion equipment generate construdion noise. At 200 feet from the construdion, Leq would be approximately the following: Activity Clearing Excavation Foundations Building Construdion Finishing Leg fin decibels J 71-72 59-77 65 60-72 62-77 Long-term impacts would be those associated with the increase in site users. Additional traffic would be generated by future uses. The increase in noise would be typlcal of a single-family residential development of this size and would be considered minimal Sound levels for various noise sourr:es include: Noise Sources Automobile Starting Closing car Door Loud Voices Automobile/Truck Traffic Sound Level at . 100 feet (dBA J 50-55 50-55 50 50 3. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construdion adivities will be performed during normal daytime working hours and compliant with the rules and regulations set forth by King County. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE. a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Both properties are vacant and undeveloped. The following is the known current uses of the adjacent properties: • North • South • East • West Single-family residences Single-family residences Single-family residence Single-family residences b. Has the site been used for agricultural purposes? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. BVALUATION FOR AGBNCY USB ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Again, there is a single-family residence with associated outbuildings present on the property. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not applicable. e. What is the current zoning of the site? 7ne current zoning is single family resident/a/ R-6 (6 units per acre). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 7ne current comprehensive plan designation is urban res/dentia~ medium (Single Family, 4-12 units per acre). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program environment designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. As stated previously, there is an existing wetland and stream on this . particular property. (Please see the Critical Areas Detennination Report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc.) 1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Based on a household occupancy rate of 2.92 people per single- family residence, it Is expected that approximately 26 new people will reside In the eight (8) new residences. J. Proposed measures to reduce displacement impacts, if any? None are proposed at this time. k. What are the proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 7ne proposed 8-lot short subdivision with single-family residences is consistent with recent and existing development in the area, current zoning, and comprehensive plan designations. 7ne project will be compliant with the County Code. EVALUATION POR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT 9. HOUSING. a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is expected that the project will provide up to 8 new single-family resident/al units in the middle income level. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not appllcable. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 10. AESTHETICS. a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s) not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The County's zoning code restricts the building heights of single- family residential structures to 35'. Exterior materials will typ/cal/y consist of wood or hardy backer type siding with brick, rock, or shingle accents. Specific materials will be determined by the home builder at the time of building permit and will comply with applicable County regulations. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any? None are proposed at this time. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE. a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? EVALUATION POR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Light and/or glare would occur primarily during evening and night time hours and would be limited to any new street lights, house lights, . and minima/ security lighting potentially within the park spaces. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your project? None. d. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 12. RECREATION. a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Maplewood Golf Course and Ron Regis Park are approximately 3.3mi/es north of the site. Another golf rourse, Fairwood Golf and Country Club, is approximately 2.1 miles to the east of this project. A bit closer, also to the east, is Renton Park along 13d" Avenue SE. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The project is proposing to ronstruct an on-site park area to serve the new residents. A development of this size (8 lots) requires 3,120 square feet (8 times 390 square feet) of recreation space which will be provided on-site. EVALUATION POR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION. a. A:re there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, · national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on the site. None are known. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 14. TRANSPORTATION. a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any: Both portions of this project are immediately accesslble to SE 18d" street and 1 Bd" A venue SE, connecting to SE 17fl1' Street (Petrovltsky), which connects directly to SR 167 and SR 405. (Please see Preliminary Plat for proposed access point). b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. The nearest public bus access Is at the intersection of 11 ff' Avenue SE and SE 17fl1' Street, which Is approximately one-half mile northwest of this project (Bus Route 155). c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Assuming a minimum of 4 parking spares per household (2-car garage and a 2-car driveway}, there wt/I be at least 32 new parking spares provided upon completion of this development. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or street, or improvements to any existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). BVALUATIOH POR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLICANT Frontage improvements to both SE 18d" Street and 11111' Avenue SE will likely be required. Will the project use or occur in the immediate vicinity of water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Based on the !TE Manual there will be approximately 80 net new tips per day generated by this project. Peak volumes would most likely occur during typieal rush hour times of 7:00 -9:00 AM and 4:00 -6:00 PM and would add approximately 8 net new AM peak and PM peak hour trips. g. What are proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The applleant will be responsible for appropriate traffic mitigation fees, which will offset some of the Impacts of the subdivision. Other mitigation includes the construction of new roads to serve the project. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES. a. Would the project result in an increase need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes. There would be a minimal Increased need for fire and police protection due to an additional 8 new lots in the area. Also, there will be a minimal Impact on the present school system. b. What are proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: Property taxes, building pennits and school Impact mitigation fees generated from these residences are expected to mitigate impacts incurred from this development. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USB ONLY TO BB COMPLBTBD BY APPLI,CANT 17. UTILITIES. a. Circle (underline) utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: cable television. b. Describe the utilities which are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service. and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity: Gas: Water: Refuse: Telephone: Sewer: cable: Puget Sound Energy Puget Sound Energy Soos Creek Water District Waste Management Qwest Communications Soos Creek Sewer Dlstrid Comcast Connection(s) to the above mentioned utilities will be negotiated with the individual purveyor during the building permit and construdion phases of this project. There may also be a need for a right-of-way permit(s) to gain access to the property at construdion. There may also be a need to extend an 8-lnch or greater line (water and/or sewer) that will be determined at final engineering approval by the utility purveyor. C. SIGNATURE. The above answers are true to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Agent for the Applicant: ----------- Date Submitted: -------- EVALUATION POR AGENCY USB ONLY WILSON-TRAN 8-LOT SHORT PLAT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (619660-0520) LOT 8, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUN1Y, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE SOUTH 90 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET THEREOF. (619660-0540) LOT 9, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUN1Y, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE WEST 375 FEET. MapQuest: Maps, Addresses, Business Directory & Satellite Photos --- 17844 120th Ave Se Renton WA 98058-6648 us Notes: Only text visible within note field will print. All rights reserved. Use Subiect to LJcense/Coovrlaht save<lnkt ~d ITlilJ>S ~ di~ions ,torourmobtle.,phone· fu,1t'NOWI Page I of I This map Is Informational only. No representation Is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and Its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. http://www.mapquest.com/maps/print.adp?mapdata=p5kqyoo6yZK6LfzObzPBTCoEK3raj ... 2/28/2008 Section I: Buildings Warehouse and Stora e .................... . Other ........................................... , ...... . Vacanl ................................................ . Section II: Pavement ........................ .. Pavement. ........................................... . Version 1. 7 12/26107 Square Feel (in thousands of 2,550.00 Total Project Emissions: Emissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet MTC02e Embodied Ener 98 33 357 54 681 41 475 39 646 39 1,541 39 1,994 39 1,938 39 737 39 777 39 577 39 723 39 733 39 899 39 339 39 599 39 352 39 1,278 39 162 espan Emissions MTC02e 12495 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 0 266 0 181 0 257 0 47 0 127500 139995! Sources: m·rn Residential Commercial Definition of Bulldinn Tunes Type (Residential) or Principal Activity Commercial\ Descrfntlon Unless otherwise specified, this includes both attached and detached Slnnle-Famllv Home ................................ :. buildlnns Multl-Famllv Unit in Larne Buildinn ........... Anartments in bulldlnas with more than 5 units MultJ.Familv Unit in Small Build Inn ........... A"' ... rtments In buildinn with 2-4 units Mobile Home ............................................. Buildings used for academic or technical classroom instruction, such as elementary, middle, or high schools, and classroom buildlngs on college or university campuses. Buildings on education campuses for which the main use is nol classroom are Included In the category relating to their use. For example, administration buildings are part of ·office," dormitories are Education .................................................. "Lodnlna," and libraries are "Public Assemblv." Food Sales ............................................... Bulldinos used for retail or wholesale of food. Buildings used for preparation and sale of food and beverages for Food Service ............................................ consumotlon. Health Care lnnatient ................................ Buildinas used as dlannostic and treatment facilities for innatient care. Bulldlngs used as diagnostic and treatment facilities for outpatient care. Doctor's or dentist's office are Included here if they use any type of diagnostic Health Care Out-·tient ............................. medical -ulnment (if th<>v do not, thev are cat,.,,orized as an office bulldlnnl. Buildings used to offer multiple accommodations for short-term or long-term LodnJnn ..................................................... residents, includlna skllled nurslno and other residential care bufldinas. Retall70ther Than Malff.. .......................... Buildinas used for the sale and disolav of aoods other than food. Buildings used for general office space, professional office, or administrative offices. Doctor's or dentiSt's office are included here if they do not use any type of diagnostic medical equipment (if they do, they are categorized as an Office .. ..................................................... outnatient health care buildlnnl. Buildings in which people gather for soclal or recreational activities, whether In Public Assemblv ....................................... nrivate or non-orivate meetina halls. Publlc Order and Safetv ........................... Build I Ms used for the Dreservatlon of law and order or oubllc safetv. Buildlngs in which people gather for religious activities, (such as chapels, Rellaious Worshio .................................... churches, mosaues, svnaooaues, and temples). Buildings in which some type of service is provided, other than food service or Service ...................................................... retail sales of noods Buildings used to store goods, manufactured products, merchandise, raw Warehouse and Storaae .......................... materials, or -rsonal belonainos (such as self-storaae). Buildings that are industrial or agricultural with some retell space; buildings having several different commercial activities that. together, comprise 50 percent or more of the floorspace, but whose largest single activity is agricultural, industrial/ manufacturing, or residential; and all other Other ......................................................... miscellaneous buildlnns that do not flt into anv other ceteaorv. Buildings In which more floorspace was vacant than was used for any single commercial activity at the time of Interview. Therefore, a vacant building may Vacant ...................................................... have some occuc led floorsoace. 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.ela.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqfl-measure.html Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS), Description of CBECS Building Types http://www.ela.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/pba99/bldgtypes.html Average GWP (lbl C02e'aq ft); Vanc:ower, ..... --- Ave-agiD Materials In a 2,272-equani loo home im:o,, ....... Embodied Emissions Wtri:sheet s.ct1ari I: Al-..., Type(~)orPnndpalAdlvl: ,_ Horne. •• --.. • .. ··---·········· , ...... _Unll ......... _ ........ . Mu!IM' untt In Small ....... .. Uoblle Horne. ........................................ . Educltlon •··•·•·•···•···•··· Food Sales-................. , .. ,,,,._ .. , .. Food Senioe ·-··-·-·· .................. . Heetth c-tnpptient ·-·······--· life sps1 related embocllod GHG -(MTC02o/l thcusand &qUfflll hlcll) • Seel or ~ in table below" 39 39 " ,. ____ 4.'.! --39 25-:SJ--991 I 39 ut ·200______ 39 5.6, --2,7,------39 241.4 9i3:!6 39 104 403 39 Health C-Outpatlent .............. =rOha-ThanMaGL. ........... ___ .. __ .J ·3:~r--1·=1 _____: ==:~::~:~::~::::::~:::::~::~:j ~;:! I El _j ~-·-·· _ ·-i ,o., 1 ,., 1 39 ----~-s1in;·::::::=~=~-== ,::~ = --------= 1=.;·::~:_-::.-::::::~::::::::::~-::::I ~:~ I . :::1 : Bedlon D: P, j Al Types d Psvemenl ....... . ~ -_ ... ._. """' .-w ... -~, u 19.1 '12 0.0 "'9.0 3206.0 :;ii;!;_(, 0.0 8.0 2T.8 ,., Al data in black tlSlCl King County, ONRP. Contact Matt Kuhaic, rnatUuharic@ldngcounty.gov R.eskierrt!al fioorSPaCo per unit 2001 Resioential Energy Ccn:surnptlQn S......ey-(N,itional A~ 2001) Square ft,o!a;e mcasuremcnt3 and eompatisons http:l~.N.doe.90':"ffl'tellkealsqff---.html ~ per buildlr,g EIA. 2003 COmmerdal Bulldtr,gs EnergyCmsumpt!on Survey {National Average. 2003) AverageGWP {lb$C02a'sqft):V~. T sb1e CJ. ~urnptlon end GIUSS Enorgy lnti,nslty for Sum of M8JOI'" Fuels tor Non-Mall Buildings. 2003 ht!p:l/www.ei.l.doe..gov/emeu/cbecs.1ebec$2003/detelled _ tablet _200312003set912003ct.ceVc3 . .x.ts LCJlllj Rise Bulldlng Alhena EcoCek:ut,tw Averag11 Meteriala in e 2.272-square foot Singl,a fsmlly home •'--<t"at;it:e ...,;rnJ1.~ :-.ln: Athenll Assembly EvabJaljon Tool v2.3-Venc:cuver LCJlllj Rise Builds,g Aseernbly AIIS19il GWP (kg) per squar9 meter ht!p;//www.athenaml.celtoolslecx<::ein tu.Ai dex.html l.bl per kg 2.20 Square hlcll per squan, meter 10.76 Building, Energy Oatll Book; 7.3 Typical/Average Household Materials Used 1n the Construdion of, 2.2n-$quant.Foot Slngle-Family HOme. 2000 htll):t~eren.doe.gow?i(Pview_book_table&Teble!Da=2036&t-Jds See also: NAHB, 2004 Hcuslng Fec:ts, F,guies and Trends. Feb. 2004. p. 7. e,~ 1nti;..-rr-et,or, A<1rni(li$batio,1.:"r.w:;:it''9 (i'"><'!r.;ici~~t;h:a;; 1•)'J.'.• "1l!M"'d" S. Ovi~tf <i ti-ie D.mi. ;:;3 S •lp:.',ftp.e,;,:.dt-t.1.qc-v/p..'O/w,1,;;m~1¢r1.',;-~;,i~t'<li;r-N ; .. ,,.po! ··-· w ... -5.7 21.3 T""' T°"'----(lm02e 6050.0 3103.0 'MTC02e ---"' 30.0 68.0 36.7 P,voma111 Emnl$il'lns Foetor, MTC02etthQusand ~"'"" feot of 11splult or t:oncAlm p11W1mant Embodkld GHG Emttlk>nl Buildings 50 ($911 below) Worbbmd Backarpund fnfpnnation Embodied GHG emissions are emissions that are created through the extraction, proce$Slng. transportation, construction and disposal of building matertals as well as emissions created through landscape disturbance (by both soil disturbance and changes In above ground biomass). Estimating embodied GHG emissions Is new field of analysis; the estimates are rapidly Improving and becoming more Inclusive of all elements of construction and development The estimate Included In this worksheet Is calculated using average values for the main construction materials that are used to craate a typical family home. In 2004, the National Assoctatlon of Home Builders calculated the average materials that ara used In a typlcal 2.272 square foot single-family OOUseholcl. The quantity of materials used Is then muttlplied by the average GHG emissions associated with the llfe-cyc:le GHG emissions for each material. This estimate is a rough and conservative estimate; the actual embodied emissions for a project are Ukety to be higher. For example, at this stage, due to a lack of comprehensive data, the estimate does not lndude Important factors such as landscape disturbance or the emlssfons assodated with the Interior components of a building (such as furniture). King County reaf!zes that the calculatlons for embodied emissions In this workSheet are rough. For example. the emissions associatecl with building 1,000 square feet of a residential bulldJng wlD not be the same as 1,000 square feet of a commercim buDdlng. However. discussions with the construc:tion community lndlcate that whDe thefV are significant differences between the diff8r9nt types of structures, this method of estimation Is reasonable: ti wUI be Improved as more data become available. AddlUonally, If more specific Information about the project Is known, King County recommends two onllne embodied emlsstons calculators that can be used to obtain a more tailored estimate for embodied emissions: WNW bulldcarbonneutral om and www athenasml ca/tools/ecoCale¢at9r/. PINflmont Four racent life cycle assessments of the environmental Impacts of roads fonn the basis for the per unit embodied emissions of pavement. Each study Is construct8d In Slightly different ways; how9ver, the aggn,gate results of the reports represent a reasonable estimate of the GHG emissions that are created from the manufacture of paving materials, construction related emissions, and maintenance of the pavement over Its expected life cycie. For specifics, see the worksheet Special Section: Estlmpting the Embod,st Emissions tor Pavement Four recent life cycle assessments of the enwonmental Impacts of roads form the basis for the per unit embodied emissions of pavement. Each study Is constructed In slightly different ways; however, the aggregate results of the reports represent a reasonable estimate of the GHG emissions that are created from the manufacture of paving materials. construction related emlsskms, and maintenance of the pawment over Its expected life cycle. The results of the studies are presented In different units and measures; considerable effort was undertaken to be able to compara the results of the studies In a reasonable way. For more details about the below methodology, contact matt.kuhartc@klngcounty.gov. The four studies. Men (2001 ), Park (2003), Strlpple (2001) and Treolar (2001) produced total GHG emissions of 4-34 MTC02e per lhouSand square feet of finished paving (for stmllar asphalt and conaate based pavements). Thts estimate does not Including downstream maintenance and repair of the highway. The average (for aD conaete and asphatt pawments in the &tooles, assuming each study gets one data point) Is -17 MTC02elthousand square feel Three of the studies attempted to thoroughly account for the emissions associated with long tenn malntsnance (40 years) of the roads. Sbipple (2001), Park et al. {2003) and Treolar(2001) report 17, 81, and 68 MTC02e/thousand square feet. respectlvely, after aa:ounting for maintenance of the roads. Based on the abow discussion, King County makes the conservative estimate that 50 MTC02e/thousand square feet of pavement (over the devefopmanfs life cycle) will be used as the embodied emission factor for pavement until better estlma1Ba can be obtained. This Is roughly equiva)ent to 3,500 MTC02e per lane mile of road (assuming the lane Is 13 feet wide). It is important to note that these studies estimate the embodied emissions for roads. Paving that does not need to stand up to the rigors of heavy use {such as parking tots or driveways} would likely use less malBrials and hence have tower embodied emissions. lio!a= Me!!, J. A Life Cyclo Pe~ on Concrete and Asphalt Roadways: Embodied Primary Energy and Global Wanring Potential. 2006. Available: http·/fwww cement.ca/cementnsfleee9egbbd6301268525§§£40052107bl§ec79dc8ae03a782852572b90061 b9 14/SFILE[ATTKQWE3/athena%20reoort%20feb %202%202007.pdf Park, K, Hwang, Y ., Seo, S., M.ASCE, and Seo, H. , "QuantftattYe Assessment of Emiironmen1al lmpaciSon UfeCycie o!Hlghways." Joumal ofConstructlonEnglneerlng and Management, Vol 129, January/Fel>Na<y 2003, pp 25-31, (DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:1 (25)). Strlppte, H. Life Cycle Assessment of Road. A Pilot Study for Inventory Analysis. Second Revised Edition. 1VL Swedi&h Environmental Research Institute Ltd. 2001. Avallatne: http:/fwww.M.sefrapporterfpdf1B1210E pelf Treloar, G .• Love, P.E.O., and Crawford, R.H. Hybrid LlhH:ycle Inventory for Road Construction and Use. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. P. 43-49. January/February 2004. ~,n::11 ~1111:.~uu:. l'YU'"'"llet: Type (Residential) or Pnncipal Activity lCommercial Si le-Fa Horne ....•......................... Muttl-Famllv Unit ln e Build. ....... Mutti-Famlfv Unit ln Small Build] ....... MobUeHome .......................................... Education .............................................. Food Sales ............................................ Food Service ......................................... Health Care I tlent ............................ Health Care c ......................... Loda! ·······••·•·•·•··•··••··········•················ Retail cOther Than Ma"1 ........................ Office .................................................... Public Assam""' ................................... Public Order and S ........................ Refialous Worshlo ................................. Service .................................................. Warehouse and Stora ....................... Other ..................................................... Vacant ................................................... ~ All data in black text Energy consumption for residential buildings Energy consumption for commercial buildings and Floorspace per building Carbon Coefficient for Buildings Residential floorspace per unit Ene'll) Floorspace MTCEpe, consumption per Cartion perBulldlng thousand MTC02epeJ building per )1!8r Coefficient for MTC02eper (thousand square feet per thousand SQuare lmillion Btu Buildlnas buildina DP..r wmr square feet _, feet oer vea1 107.3 0.108 11.61 2.53 4.6 16.8 41.0 0.108 4.44 0.65 5.2 19.2 78.1 0.108 6.45 1.39 6.1 22.2 75.9 0.108 6.21 1.06 7.7 26.4 2.125.0 0.124 264.2 25.6 10.3 37.6 1.110.0 0.124 136.0 5.6 24.6 90.4 1.436.0 0.124 178.5 5.6 31.9 116.9 60,152.0 0.124 7,479.1 241.4 31.0 113.6 985.0 0.124 122.5 10.4 11.8 43.2 3.578.0 0.124 444.9 35.8 12.4 45.6 720.0 0.124 89.5 9.7 9.2 33.8 1.378.0 0.124 171.1 14.8 11.6 42.4 1,338.0 0.124 166.4 14.2 11.7 43.0 1.791.0 0.124 222.7 15.5 14.4 52.7 440.0 0.124 54.7 10.1 5.4 19.9 501.0 0.124 62.3 6.5 9.6 35.1 764.0 0.124 95.0 16.9 5.6 20.6 3,600.0 0.124· 447.6 21.9 20.4 74.9 294.0 0.124 36.6 14.1 2.6 9.5 King County, DNRP. Con1act Matt Kuharic, matt.kuharlc@kingcounty.gov 2007 Buildings Energy Data Book: 6.1 Quad Definitions and Comparisons (National Average, 2001) Table 6. 1.4: Average Annual Carbon Dioxide Emissions for Various Functions http://bulldlngsdatabook.eren.doe.gov/ Data also at http://www.eia.doe.govfemeu/recs/recs2001_ce/ce1-4c_housingunits2001.html EIA, 2003 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey(Natlonal Average, 2003) Table C3. Consumption and Gross Energy Intensity for Sum of Major Fuels for Non-Mall Bulldings, 2003 http://www.ela.doe.govtemeu/cbecslcbecs2003Jdetailed _tables_ 2003/2003set9/2003exceVc3.xls Average Lifespan Ene,gy Building Life Related MTC02e Soan emissions oer unit 57.9 672 60.5 357 60.5 681 57.9 475 62.5 16,526 62.5 8,632 62.5 11,168 62.5 467 794 62.5 7,660 62.5 27,826 62.5 5,599 62.5 10 701 62.5 10,405 62.5 13,928 62.5 3,422 62.5 3,896 62.5 5,942 62.5 27,997 62.5 2.288 Note: Data In plum color is found In both of the above sources (bulldings energy data book and commercial buildings energy consumption survey). Buildings Energy Data Book (National average, 2005) Tabfe 3.1.7. 2005 Carbon O!o)<Jde Emission Coefficients for Buildings (MMTCE per QuadriUion Btu) http:!/buildingsdatabook.eere.energy.govi?ld=view_book_table& TablelD=2057 Note: Carbon coefficient in the Energy Data book is in MTCE per Quadrillion Btu. To convert to MTC02e per m!Uion Btu, this factor was divided by 1000 and muitiplied by 44/12. 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2001) Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.ela.doe.gov/emeulrecs/sqft,.measure.html Lifespan Ene,gy Related MTC02e emissions per thousand sQuare feet 266 422 469 446 646 1,541 1,994 1,936 737 m 577 723 733 899 339 599 352 1,278 162 average lief span of buildings. estimated by replacement time method Single Family Multi-Famlly Units All Residential Homes ln Large and Buildings Small Bulldinos New Housing Construction, 2001 1,273 000 329.000 1,602,000 Existing Housing Stock, 2001 73,700,000 26,500.000 100,200,000 Replacement (national time: 57.9 80.5 62.5 average, 2001) Note: Single family homes calculation is used for mobile homes as a best estimate life span. Note: A_t this time, KC staff could find no reliable data for the average life span of commercial buildings. Therefore, the average life span of residential buildings is being used until a better approximation can be ascertained. Sources: New Housing Construction, 2001 Quarterly Starts and Completions by Purpose and Design ~ US and Regions (Excel) http://www.census.gov/const/quarter1y _starts_ completions_ cust.xls See also: http:llwww.census.gov/const/www/newresc~nstindex.html Existing Housing Stock, 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) 2001 Tables HC1 :Housing Unit Characterisdcs. Million U.S. Households 2001 Table HC1-4a. Housing Unit Characteristics by Type of Housing Unit, Million U.S. Households, 2001 Million U.S. Households, 2001 http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/recs2001lhc_pdf/housunlts/hc1-4a_houslngunits2001.pdf IIQII.> 11.QUYII ~U~UII:. 11'-,\R....:Ml~l Type (Residentlal) or Principal Activity (Commercial Sinale-Famllv Home ................••••••••.•........ Multi-Fa Unit In Lame BuUdino ........... Mutti-Famnv Unit in Small Buildlna ........... Mobile Home ........•....•.............................. Education ................................................ Food Sales .............................................. Food Service .....••.................................... Health care ln .... tient ............................... Health care c ............................ Lodaina .................................................... Retail tOther Than Malll .....................•...... Office ...•••............•....••...••......................... Public Assemblv ...................................... Public Order and Safetv ........................... RotinJous Worshio ....•..•.........•.................. Service ..........................••.••..................... Warehouse and Stnrane .......................... Other •.................•.•...••••.....•..................... Vacant ..................................................... ~ All data in black text # people/ unit Residential floorspace per unit # employees/thousand square feet · vehlde related GHG emissions MTC02e/ # people or ( metric tonnes year/ # Jhousand employees/ C02eper thousand # people/ unit or sq feet/ unit thousand peraon per MTC02e/ square buildinc or buildinc c:nuare feet =ar VP.~u/ unit feet 2.8 2.53 1.1 4.9 13.7 5.4 1.9 0.85 2.3 4.9 9.5 11.2 1.9 1.39 1.4 4.9 9.5 6.8 2.5 1.06 2.3 4.9 12.2 11.5 30.0 25.6 1.2 4.9 147.8 5.8 5.1 5.6 0.9 4.9 25.2 4.5 10.2 5.6 1.8 4.9 50.2 9.0 455.5 241.4 1.9 4.9 2246.4 9.3 19.3 10.4 1.9 4.9 95.0 9.1 13.6 35.8 0.4 4.9 67.1 1.9 7.8 9.7 0.8 4.9 38.3 3.9 28.2 14.8 1.9 4.9 139.0 9.4 6.9 14.2 0.5 4.9 34.2 2.4 18.8 15.5 1.2 4.9 92.7 6.0 4.2 10.1 0.4 4.9 20.6 2.1 5.6 6.5 0.9 4.9 27.6 4.3 9.9 16.9 0.6 4.9 49.0 2.9 18.3 21.9 0.8 4.9 90.0 4.1 2.1 14.1 0.2 4.9 10.5 0.7 King County, DNRP. Contact: Matt Kuharic, matt.kuharic@kingcounty.gov EstimaUng Household Size for Use in Population Estimates (WA state, 2000 average) Washington State Office of Financial Management Kimpel, T. and Lowe, T. Resean:h Brief No. 47. August 2007 http://www.ofm.wa.gov/researchbriefs/brief04 7 .pdf Average Building Life Snan 57.9 80.5 80.5 57.9 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Note: This analysis combines Multi Unit Structures in both large and small units into one category: the average is used In this case although there is likely a difference 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2001) · Square footage measurements and comparisons http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/sqft-measure.html Life span transportation related GHG emissions (MTC02e/ Mr unit 792 766 766 709 9247 1579 3141 140506 5941 4194 2394 8696 2137 5796 1298 1n9 3067 5630 657 Coinmercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey commercial energy uses and costs (National Median, 2003) Table B2 Totals and Medians of Floorspace. Number of Workers, and Hours o1 Operation for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003 hnp://www.eia.doe.govfemeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed_tables_2003/2003set1/2003excel,'b2.xls Note: Data for# employees/thousand square feel is presented by CBECS as square feet/employee. Life span transportation related GHG emissions (MTC02e/ thousand sq feet 313 904 550 666 361 282 561 562 571 117 247 586 150 374 129 266 181 257 47 In this analysis emptoyeeslthousand square feet is calculated by taking the inverse of the CBECS number and multiplying by 1000. vehicle related GHG emissions Estlmate calculated as follows (Washington state, 2006)_ 56,531,930,000 2006 Annual WA State Vehicle Miles Traveled Data was daily VMT. Annual VMT was 365.dally VMT. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/mapsdata/tdo/annualmileage.htm 6,395,798 2006 WA state population http://qulckfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/53000.htm1 8839 vehicle miles per person per year 0.0506 gallon gasoline/mile This is the weighted national average fuel efficiency for all cars and 2 axle, 4 wheel light trucks in 2005. This inciudes pickup trucks, vans and SUVs. The 0.051 gallons/mile used here is the inverse of the more commonly known term ·miles/per gallon~ (which is 19.75 for these cars and light trucks). Transportation Energy Data Book. 26th Edition. 2006. Chapter 4: light Vehicles and Characteristics. Calculations based on weighted average MPG efficiency of cars and light trucks. http://cta.oml.gov/<1ata/tedb261Editlon26 _ Chapter04.pdf Note: This report states that in 2005, 92.3°/o of all highway VMT were driven by the above described vehicles. http:J/cta.oml.gov/data/tedb26/Spreadsheets/Table3_04.xls 24.3 lbs C02e/gallon gasoline The CO2 emissions estimates for gasoline and diesel include the extraction, transport, and refinement of petroleum as well as their combustion. Ufe-Cycie CO2 Emissions for Various New Vehicles. RENew Northfield. Available: http://renewnorthfield.org/wpcontenUuploads/2006/04/C02%2Demlssions.pdf Note: This is a conservative estimate of emissions by fuel consumption because diesel fuel, 2205 With a emissions factor of 26.55 lbs C02e/gallon was not estimated. 4.93 lbs/metric tonne vehicle related GHG emissions (metric tonnes C02e per person per year) average lief span of buildings, estimated by replacement lime method See Energy Emissions Worksheet for Calculations Commercial floorspace per unit EIA, 2003 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (National Average, 2003) Table C3. Consumption and Gross Energy Intensity for Sum of Major Fuels for Non-Mall Buildings. 2003 http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed_tables_2003/200~set9f2003excel/c3.xls 0 • ------------(;-----·----- ·-OHE----- ----~f\----T • ---·-----s s--·-·--- ···-----W·---·-·· )~----·---·)(-- 1JB [:=! • TBM FOUND MONUMENT (AS NOTED) FOUND REBAR (AS NOTED) SET REBAR AND CAP (AS NOTED) GAS LINE POWER (OVERHEAD) LINE T ' WV l"c<j V TELEPHONE PEDESTAL WATER METER WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT SIGN DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE STORM DRAIN LINE (AS NOTED) SANITARY SEWAR LINE (AS NOTED) TELEPHONE (ARIEL) -280 -EXISTING CONTOUR WATER LINE FENCE (AS NOTED) GAS VALVE KING COUNTY D.D.E.S. GUY ANCHOR UTILITY PO LE REVIEW ENGINEER COMPLETION DATE STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER CLEAN-OUT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE TELEPHONE JUNCTION BOX I· "' 1~ g ----··-·-----1 ) / ,------ 1 EX HOUSE L_ SENIOR ENGINEER COMPLETION DATE JAMES H. SANDERS, P.E. APPROVAL DATE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER COMMENTS: --1 EX HOUSE L_______ - ' .-120B;l----f---1-- ' _J I / / Wpl..AND BUFFER MITIGATION AREA 1-__J I I I EX HOUSE -1 I I I I EX HOUSE I -· ---_j I I L _J WARNING: THE UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. EXISTING DEPTHS UNKNOWN. CALL 1 -800-424-5555 FOR LOCATION. EXISTING LOT LINE TABLE LINE LI L2 L3 L4 L5 LS L7 LB L9 L10 L11 L12 L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 L19 L20 L21 L22 L23 L24 L25 L26 , -· -1 EX HOUSE I_ --_J BEARING DISTANCE S 88'03'21" E 81.06' N 01'34'22" E 63. 73' N 88'40'32" E 157.38 S 01'49'33" W 153.96' S 8B'03'31" E 300.00' S 01 '49'33" W 272.B7' S 48'56'03' w 213.D9' N 68'11 '55" W 207.34' S 14'39'14" E 377.D1' N B0'44'38" E 275.35' S 01'50'43" W 30.57' N B0'45'43" E 10.19' S 01'50'43" W 120.46' N 88'02' 33" W 194.89' S 14'39'14" E 206.92' N 88'02 36" W 259.99' N 01'34'22" E 30.08' N 88'01 '34" W 254.96' N 01'25'36" E 141.01' N 88'01 '34" W 225.24' N 01'25'22" E 90.01' N 88'01'34" W 149. 73' N 01'25'36" E 51.00' S 88'01 '34" E 630.65' N 01'34'22" E 706.08' N 14'31'39" W 292.30' EX HOUSE I I_ I _/ '-----__ ---_ ..!_50=-'--__ ---_/_ ---75'._ ---_1_ ---75'._ ---__ 75' ----- I I I / X ---- ------------------- ------------------------------------ A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 33, T 23 N, R 5 E, W.M. SOUTH PARCEL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: [PARCEL I] (619660-0520) LOT 8, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DJVISION NUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT TO THE SOUTrl 90 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET THEREOF. (SURVEY RECORDED JUNE 13, 2005 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20050613900009. [PARCEL 2] (619660-0540) LOT 9, BLOCK 2, NOR Tri WESTERN GARDEN TRACTS, DNISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47 RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE WEST 375 FEET. APPLICANT: BREND TRAN (619660-0520) 15437 139th Ave SE RENTON, WA 98058 (206) 4 78-5902 EDWARD WILSON & NANN BUSSELLE (619660-0549) 17844 120th Ave SE RENTON, WA 98058 (425) 235-6008 CIVIL ENGINEER: PREFERRED ENGINEERJNG, LLC STEVE LEE, P.E. 4238 SW 314th St FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 (206) 50 l-5708 PLANNER: PK ENTERPRISES ATTN: PHILLIP KITZES 23035 SE 263rd St MAPLE VALLEY, WA 98032 (206) 227-7445 PURVEYORS: WATER SEWER TELEPHONE POWER GAS CABLE REFUSE SOOS CREEK SOOS CREEK QWEST COMMUNJCATIONS PSE PSE COMCAST WASTE MANAGEMENT CONTOUR INTERVAL • 2' DATUM VERT: NAVD88 DATUM HOR: NAVD83 SCA! F· 1"-40' ----------20 0 ,40 80 ----------75' --=7""5 .---.1..---,--------75' NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD AtN FIELD DEVIATION FROM ENGINEERING PL.ANS. THESE RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT ON CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND TURNED OVER TO THE ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF PROJECT. I I I I I i ---- EX HOUSE I I EX HOUSE l ' i J Rf6 (~INGLE jFAMILY) EX HOUSE I I 1o IR r-"- I ' 1---_j I L EX HOUSE -, \ L08S()02 l1 REVISIONS NO, DESCRIPTION/DATE BY , 1ST SUBMITTAL (PRO..) 2/28/08 ST 2 3 4 -----·------- ~ a.. ~ 0 I (/) b ...J I CX) z ~ t:. z 0 (/) ...J 1-1 s JOB NO.: a... <( :::1!: z 0 -(/) > 0 CD ::::> (/) • 0 ~ ~ D:: 8 z z ::::, 2007-200 DWG. NAME: PRE-GR01.DWG DESIGNED BY: STL DRAWN BY: JK CHECKED BY: OP DATE: 12/28/07 DATE OF PRINT: PREGR-1 1 OF 2 SHEETS LEGEND g. lBM .r .. • 0 • -·---G-·--- ---OHE--~--- FOUND MONUMENT (AS NOTED) FOUND REBAR (AS NOTED) SET REBAR AND CAP (AS NOTED) GAS LINE POWER (OVERHEAD) LINE STORM DRAIN LINE (AS NOTED) SANITARY SEWAR LINE (AS NOTED) r 'NM EB rJ TELEPHONE PEDESTAL WATER METER WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT SIGN DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE ----T ---TELEPHONE (ARIEL) --------IN------ sscr.: 0 T,JB [] • WATER LINE FENCE (AS NOTED) GAS VALVE GUY ANCHOR UTILITY POLE STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER CLEAN-OUT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE TELEPHONE JUNCTION BOX I I I I-"' 0 "' I ;': I ---------, ,-· ' I L_ I / EX HOUSE L KING COUNlY D.D.E.S. REVIEW ENGINEER SENIOR ENGINEER JAMES H. SANDERS, P.E. DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER COMMENTS: EX HOUSE ------ ' I I _ _J COMPLETION DATE COMPLETION DATE APPROVAL DATE _J l I I / / '--'WETLAND BUFFER M(TIGATION AREA I I I _I ,-- EX HOUSE EX HOUSE ' _J _j I WARNING: THE UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. EXISTING DEPTHS UNKNOWN. CALL 1 -800-424-5555 FOR LOCATION. EXISTING LOT LINE TABLE LINE L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 LB L9 L10 L 11 L12 L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 L19 L20 L21 L22 L23 L24 L25 L26 ' ---l I EX HOUSE _I BEARING DISTANCE S 88'03'21" E 81.06' N 01'34'22" E 63.73' N 88'40'32" E 157.38' s 01'49'33" w 153.96' s 88'03 31" E 300.00' s 01·49'33" W 272.87' S 43·55'03" W 213.09' N 68'11 '55" W 207.34' S 14'39'14" E 377.01' N 80'44'38" E 275.35' S 01'50'43" W 30.57' N 80'4543" E 10.19' S 01·50'43" W 120.46' N 88'02'33" W 194.89' S 14·39'14" E 206.92' N 88'02' 36" W 259.99' N 01'34'22" E 30.08' N aa·o1 • 34" w 254.96' N 01'25'36" E 141.01' N 88'01 '34" W 225.24' N 01'25'22" E 90.01' N 88'01'34" W 149. 73' N 01'25'36" E 51.00' S 88'01 '34" E 630.65' N 01'34'22" E 706.08' N 14'31 39" W 292.30' EX (SINGLE FAMILY) ZONING R-6 (TYP.) EX HOUSE I I l_ -_J I I I ___ ]_ 75' 75' --------_,_ ----- --~----------~- -------------------------- NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD ANY FIELD DEVIATION FROM ENGINEERING PLANS. THESE RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT ON CONSTRUcrtoN DRAWINGS AND TURNED OVER TO THE ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF PROJECT. ---- ---------- I I I I -----75' r- 1 l I I EX HOUSE I I I EX HOUSE ' L J A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 33, T 23 N, R 5 E, W.M. SOUTH PARCEL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: [PARCEL I] (619660-0520) LOT 8, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NUMBER I, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT TO THE SOUTH 90 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET THEREOF. (SURVEY RECORDED JUNE 13, 2005 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20050613900009. [PARCEL 2] (619660-0540) LOT 9, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS, DIVISION NO. I, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47 RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE WEST 375 FEET. APPLICANT: BREND TRAN (619660-0520) 15437 139th Ave SE RENTON, WA 98058 (206) 4 78-5902 EDWARD WILSON & NANN BUSSELLE (619660-0549) 17844 !20th Ave SE RENTON, WA 98058 ( 425) 235-6008 CIVIL ENGINEER: PREFERRED ENGINEERING, LLC STEVE LEE, P.E. 4238 SW 314th St FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 (206) 501-5708 PLANNER: PK ENTERPRISES ATTN: PHILLIP KITZES 23035 SE 263rd St MAPLE VALLEY, WA 98032 (206) 227-7445 ! I I I I EX (SINGLE FAMILY) PURVEYORS: WATER SEWER TELEPHONE POWER GAS CABLE REFUSE NOTES: SOOS CREEK SOOS CREEK QWEST COMMUNICATIONS PSE PSE COMCAST WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS: 619660-0520, 619660-0540 TOTAL LOT AREA: 2.57 acres ZONING:R-6 ALO WED NUMBER OF LOTS/UNITS: 15 TOTAL LOTS SHOWN: 8 MIN LOT SIZE: 3,343 sq ft MAX LOT SIZE: 6,049 sq ft AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 4,198 sq ft RECREATION AREA REQ'D: 390 x 8 = 3,120 sq ft RECREATION AREA 'TRACT A' PROVIDE: ???? sq ft BOUNDARY SURVEY: FIELD VERIFIED TOPOGRAPHY/SENSITIVE AREAS: FIELD VERIFIED l I I \ ' r / :) ' r r • r • \ I I I I CONTOUR NrERVAL • 2' DATUM VERT: NAVD88 DATUM HOR: NAVD83 SCA! F· 1"-40' ----------20 0 40 80 \ ' ·, / / • ' • REVISIONS NO. DESCRIPTION/DATE BY 1 2 3 4 1$1' SUBMITTAi. (Pfl:EL) 2/28/08 5 a. ~ 0 I U) g I 00 z ~ t:. z 0 ~ 1-1 s 0.. <( ~ z 0 -(/) -> 0 CD :::, (/) ST ~ z :::, 8 (!) z -:.:: • C ~ ~ a::: 0 u z -z :::, JOB NO.: 2007-200 DWG. NAME: PRE-GR01.DWG DESIGNED BY: STL DRAWN BY: JK CHECKED BY: DP DATE: 12/28/07 DATE OF PRINT: PREGR-1 1 OF 2 SHEETS _,· ... ------. ·--------·"·-'· .... .... ----- >! '' ' ·--- I ' \ ,. ·-' LEGEND , A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 33 T 23 N R 5 E W.M. . . .. ·. I . I I ' ' ' tr ~~ 0 , •• -•G--·-- TBM ' -' . . FOUND MONUMENT (AS NOTED) .. . - FOUND REEIAA (AS NOTED) · ... SET REBAR. AND CAP (AS NOIEO) GAS LINE -OHE POWER (OVERHEAD) LINE .. . . . ~sD--. STORM DRAIN LI.NE (AS NOTED) ' ' ' . . . ' ' . . ' ' -·-ss---SANITARY SEWAR LINE (AS NOTED) '. ' ' ' . : ' -T TELEPHONE (ARIEL) ~-·w-·-·. X X GV fX1 UP -Oc CB [Jl!l 1~·· @ ssco 0 ' I I I . I· "' ' -N . . , -. WATER LINE . . . -~-. . ., . FENCE (AS NOTED) ' GAS VM.VE GUY ANCHOR UTILITY POLE ' . ' STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER MANHOLE .. . ' ' SANITARY SEWER . CLEAN-OUT ' . ' ' ._ _.-' •· .. ' V • ' SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE . ' TELEPHONE JUNCTION . eox . ,-, .. I I I .: I I I I I I I. I I I g -I;! I I I . I I EX HOUSE ' I. I I L :__ __ ...J . . a; \ I r-"--.. -.···"l .· I EX HOUSE I ' I I L _·-.-·..J ·.· . I -J ,.,1 ,. \ -· ... ~· ----, -.___,_~ _-·."'--_--; I I ' '', ( .. ' ' 0 ~71'\.' I, , . • -280- -280- TELEPHONE PEDESTAL WATER MMR 'WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT SIGN . . ' ' . ., ' -' ' DECIDUOUS TREE ' . CONIFEROUS TREE :> . . INLET SOCK DAYLIGHT LINE EXISTING CONTOUR ·PROPOSED CONTOUR KING '.C0UNTY D.D.E.S. · . ' . REVIEW ENGINEER .·•. COMPLETION DATE SENIOR ENGINEER COMPLETION DATE ' JAMES H •. SANDERS,. P;E. APPROVAL DATE .• [1EVELOPM~NT ENGINEER COMMENTS: .. -~ ' . . -' '' . . . •, ·- WIBtfNA . THE UTiLITY LOCATIONS SHOWN 1 .'".~ ' •• , .... . . -.-.... _ ....... ~ . i•••'\;I'~, •• ,( :,. '•.. ... ... ~ ......... , : .. ; ..... , ... : r. -!, ••••• · CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ' ' • I I I I I I I I I I I I , I ', • • C TEMPORARY .DITCH CLEARING LIMITS · SILT FENCE / ,-· ' ' - · Rl6 (SINGLE IFAMILY) I I ,-, ' I I I I I I EX . (SINGLE FAMILY) . . . ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. EXISTING DEPTHS UN .KNOWN; , CALL .· . . 1-,800--424~5555 FOR ··. LOCATION. ZONING · ' R-6 (TYP.) I I I I I I I I I . I '~~ --- EX ' (SINGLE FAMILY) I I ,' -.--' ''"l I I i _J I I I ,,,.___ _I • I I I I ' . . .. . -. ' " EX HOUSE I ' I I L ____ _J I I EX HOUSE I I l ___ _J r---1 I . . I I .EX HOUSE I ; I / I I r-·-· -. '1· . ' I I · · · I I I I EX HOUSE I I I L_·_..JJ . L __ _J I . CONC RAMP ., ...__ __ --:...___ -,150=-'-· -----75' 75' .. · .1 8:1 ~~1~MAX) . / _/_ ------_[_: ------'--'-·, l,._Mt ·75• .. ;.· ' ~I -~~/"· -:-· CC. -C. -. .....,..s,,! .......... _ .. ___ _ --· ,....._ __ -,......_,..; ---------:.. --ij-:y__. --· ---'"'--..,_..__.,.. I I . I I . _ _,, \ \ / / \ ' - ---1!3j)th' SAM -- 6 ------ I I - • ' • ' C '., .·' '•. ' ' .... '' ·, ., ·.-··-_· '' '.,c ' -' \'" . . . ' ', . : .., ' r \ \ / ' ' / -;. ,•>,' ,, . . ' ,, ' ' ' ,'. :· ,· - . ',' -_ '' ,' ··_ . :, ', : _,_-. ' ·: -~' \ /" ·1 -·, -/ . I / / <'. ' ' '--.i-lUNNAMEO TRIBUTARY.:_1 1YPE F · STREAM BUFFER ' i ( 1;15' BU.FFER LINE) 1 I -·-:.......·_] /.,,/ . ':.,,,- [// WOOD DECK . \ ' \ .. ' \ I I I ' . ' __., ---~r \ ·-, . ' . \ . " • --.. ~--,,._.,.;: -: .. ·-., . I I ~~"'-' --....__ ----'------,---------'-'-~ _ --____ ~ _ --..._c _ _ ,_,~~.~.·~· ~ ...... _:;::;:::;::~. ul~. ~. ".WRr CURB · ~ r 75' . I -1=s·"" -...-.i.-,-,"----~15-· ---"-r---_c1c_GU1TER_ --~;2_ .. _.a1.::,·-;:::: ··1'. ,--.. ~ i. I --'l Rr6 -.·" ,_ • I 'ss,-1 --\ I · .. ·NOTE: . CONTRACTOR ,SHAU. RECORD M( FIELD DEVIATION FROM . E~GINEERING PLANS, . THESE RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT ON .• . CONSTRUCTION . DRAWINCs · AND . TURNED . OVER TO.· THE . . ENGINEER UPON ·. COl,IPL.ETlON · .OF PROJECT. . . . 1 1 1 1 r---·· .. 1 · c11NGLE 1 FAMILY) .II . .. . If Ex . HousE ·.r' I II Ex HousE I f ,' • f ·· .. I I I I L._· '' I! i ·EXHOUSf:,· 1 ·w • 1R I \ -\ 'J· /-.30• 31)' I I 1/ I : I f 1{{\ I <rj . . I I ,-_J I .EX HOUSE . I . L . I --. -~ '---4 . BOWRDS. INNER 2 REMOVABI E , •• "l l __ _ ' v'• 0 °' \ . _;. ·,; -, .. ·., ,' ,' ) // "'.: > --.·,' ,,'. . . . ' . .':,-' I •, , NOTE:·. CONTRAOTPR SHALL . REC()RD ANY ,FIELD DEVIATION FROM '. ·.···· :~~~f=:~WIN~~DR~~~.~~~E~PT ON . ,· .. · .ENGINEER • UPON COMPL.ETlON OF PROJECT, .CONTou:l NIERVAL • 2' DATUM VERT: NAVD88 . DATUM HOR:. NAVD83 SCAJ F: 1"oo40' --------- \ ) 0 -o; 40 . 20 / ·. / 0 -/ - / 7.,/' ; . 40 80 ---. REVISIONS NO. "DESCRIPTION OATE-BY , . 1 1 ST SUBWITAL cP&) S1i 1/7/07 2 J . ; . ',,;, . '. ' :; ,, ' ,•, " <. ·. ',., '\ ' ' ' ! . \ ", " ' ',· . i_'. '/ ' . --. . . 0 ~\ I 'le \ ... , \ .. " ' \ I I /'fl '\ I I I I T I I I I I I ........ l l ';; '. ._. " . ,,OW . ~ . .. . ce : z . ..J . • c( D. a: i ~. ..J ...J I-,,,,,,, a.. z · ~ >-: w .=: ~ ::c: ·wz ~ I-. 0 0, . n . a::· • •••• • CX) u, ·.:g .~' w w a: ~ I-. z c( . z <( ..J ' 0 a:: D. u, .~ ::c: ·..J" C!) I-i .~· :::, '~ . 0 z C!) "'. ::c: ' ' ,' ' ' . I z c(z, ·., 0, "' ..J -~ S2 .. ------' JOB NO.: . ,2007-200 ' ' -' .-; ' ' . ' ' ,' ,_ ' ' -. ·, . ' . DWG. NAME: PRE-GR01,DWG DESIJ?NED BY: " ' SIL ' : ' ' ' .. '·. ''1. ' JK DRAWN BY:' CHECKED BY: OP DATE: 2/19/08 DATE ·OF ' , ' PRINT: ' · ·• '• ' ' _·; ~ -7--_":' -.:-r" ' • ' ' I ' ' I • ) , , ;::, ' '(; : ~--: :, ·' J' .; . PREGR-1 ' l I i O 1g @~ow~· ., ;i ..... ,;. ......_~---------------------------~--~~ .................. ___________________ ......... .......,. __ ~ ..................................... --.......... ---------1"-----------................. .....W.L,. ' ', ' ; . . . v_.·_-.,. ' • .-'<. . . . ' . .. . . '. . . . . LU8S0021 . . K.C :. D,D,E.S. I ,: . . I . . . . . • . A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 Of SECTIO ; 33, T 23 N, R 5 E, W.M. LEGEND • + 0 • -·-OHE- --SD-- --ss- --T --w )( X a, txl _g_ liffl @ @ ~ TJB D n ' TBM FOUND MONUMENT (AS NOTED) FOUND RFPM (AS NOTED) SET PfBM ANO CM' (AS NOTED) GAS LINE POWER (MRHOO) LINE STORM DRAIN LINE (AS NOTED) . SWTAR't' SEWAR LINE (AS NOTED) . mEPtfOIE (ARia.) WATER LINE FENCE (AS NOTED) GAS VALVE GUY ANCHOR UT1UTY POI£ Slt«M SEWER CATCH BASIN S10RM SEWER Mfttll lOLE SNITAR't' SEWER CLEAN-our SANITARY SEwER t.WI IOLE TEl.£PHONE oJUNC110N BOX T WM EB WV txl ti 0 * • -280--. -280- • ' 1r,,:_,;o...;,. :.:_..~ ' .............. -,-"'.1. • -... .. • ,t'-,"':_:, ·. ! I I 1D.EPHONE PEDESTAL WATER METER WATER VN..VE FIRE .HYDRANT SIGN DECIOUOUS TREE · CONIFEROUS TREE INLET SOCK DAYLIGHT LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TEMPORARY DITCH CLEARING LIMITS SILT FENCE KING COUNTY o.o.E;s. . REVIEW ENGINEER CQMPLETION DATE . SENIOR ENGINEER COMPLETION ,DATE '. ~~· H, ~[)ERS, P.~ ~AL DATE DE.VELOPMOO ··ENGINEER · COMMEN'TS: ... . ' .. WMMtfft . : --,- THE UTILllY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. EXISTING DEPTHS UNKNOWN. CALL 1-800-.-424--5555 FOR LOCATION. "'<·: =>---~~~=+· -,:·~--. ~<~~~"ce<~;) f ;,-;;.-~.--~~~-':':t ,,-· ·(' ' I I -. : r m I I I I• I~ I I I ,---, I . I I EX HOUSE I I I I I L ___ _J --------.. I I ---- I I '-~ I;! I I t I ~ ,-<:~-._,.!'!? ;,· / ., ) /206'/ / L -------- I I r----1 I I / I I EX HOUSE I I I J I L ____ _J I I I I I " I ,, ,, ' EX 1 (SINGLE F ... MILY) ! ., ' i' ZONING R-6 (TYP~) (S INGLE FAMILY) I I I I I I I I I I I I I EX (SINGLE FAMILY) · 1 . A2 A -, ~] A8 t t Tl i . .. [ I ! V I -· --------I I AR£/\ I I I ',_..4 ,. _ _....-----,, ,----,··/t!~W GRA~L ~+---.,.,. ----' ....._ I ----,,. -----. --...J ,._ __ ,,..,,,. ,,,..---WEIJ)H> IUFFER ...... j j -----//7 ~ -------------... ,,,..,.,.. _.,.,,,,. I I Sl'RE'Al&'BUFfER I ~~----0 ,.,, / I \ I \ _ __. I I I / '-I I I I ' -- '-'1 I I I ·--· --- 'l . ---""' \ .,,... '-.. -:-----.,,,-, ------- --...2 -- 1 --r:------, l --Rl6 (Slt-lGLE !FAMILY) ,-;-, I I , I II I_J I I I EX HOUSE I I I I L __ _J I I ,----i I I I EX HOUSE I L __ __J I 75' ------ ------' ' ·,\ '\. \ . l ' ,-. -, I ; EX! HOUSE I I .· . I \ ' I --I --- 6 I I 8 -------------------~----------, --------------------__,.... . NOTE: CONTRAC10R 9W.L RECOfl> mY FIELD 0£\'IATION FROM ENGII FWWW PlS'IS. THESE RECORDS SH.~ BE l<EPT ON CONSTRUcT10N DRAWI .IGS . Nt> T\JRNED OVER TO 1HE ENGINEER UPON COMPL£noN OF PROJECT. I I I I I --.------=-r.;-75' --75' r---i I I I I I r---1 I I EX HOUSE I I I ,, '! ! I I I EX HOUSE I I I I I I I L__ I I 7s' -J ---- r --J Rr6 / (llNGLE /FAMILY) I I I .. I I IR I EX HOUSE I / ' ) / • (\ ·, l \ I I I I \ I \ 1 4 > \ t \ 'I" > I r ~ ... I "' ·o I e; I ·i i i"t- I { - ' ! ·' I '· i ~1 ,, i ,. ,,...- I I I I I I I - ' q 4 IIOWRDS. NIBt21FJCWPE • ' -' ' 1---/ I I I I I -~-.i ' I ; l .• ' ' ' · NOTE: ~ SHH.L RECQRO /tiff Fl£LD DEVIATION FROM ENGINEERING . Pt.ANS. T1£SE RECORDS SHALL BE l<EPT ON CONSmUCTION DIWIJIINGS NI> TURNED <MR TO Tt£ ENGINEER UPON C01i1P1.EOON OF PROJECr • . CONTOlR .NTEFIVAL • tr DATI.N VEIT; NAVD88 DATI.M HCFI: NAVD83 8CAI e 'fl 40' ---------0 IO LU8S00 2l -- I I I I . ~! K .C. D.D.E .S . I I ,r' \ I I I I T I I I I I I l l ' ,, ' REVISIONS NC. CCS UP'llON ~TE 8V 2. 3 4 JOf! NO.: .J § w -l.&J ~ z ~ 0 ~ u, 0 .I c.5 3 ~ .~ z C!) i z DWC. NAME: Pft£-GA01.DIIO DESIGNED BV: SIL Dl'IAWN BV: JK CHECKED 11'1': 11P DATE: 2/19/08 DATE OF PRINT: PREGR-1 2 OF 2 SHEETS LEGEND tr TBM WARNNG: ._y_. • 0 FOUND MONUMENT (AS NOTED) FOUND REBAR (AS NOTED) T 'NM III -"- TELEPHONE PEDESTAL WATER METER THE UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. EXISTING • SET t1EBAR AND CAP (AS NOTED) -----·--G------GAS LINE [Xj WATER VALVE DEPTHS UNKNOWN. CALL 1-800-424-5555 FOR LOCATION. -----·OHE---- -----SD-------- -----·--SS---- ---w. -·----·- . 7(---·---------;,(-· GV [XJ Uf' -{)- CB urn TJD D I /. FIRE HYDRANT POWER (OVERHEAD) LINE SIGN STORM DRAIN LINE (AS NOTED) SANITARY SEWAR LINE (AS NOTED) TELEPHONE (ARIEL) DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE WATER LINE FENCE (AS NOTED) GAS VALVE GUY ANCHOR UTILITY POLE STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER CLEAN-OUT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE TELEPHONE JUNCTION BOX I I 0 '" I I I I I ,_ "' 1~ I I EX HOUSE -. -- -----·-280 --EXISTING CONTOUR KING COUNTY D.D.E.S. REVIEW ENGINEER COMPLETION DATE SENIOR ENGINEER COMPLETION DATE JAMES H. SANDERS, P.E. APPROVAL DATE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER COMMENTS: 1-1 EX HOUSE L -----· ' _j I ' ·, ..._ --,-l ' --- I W~ND BUFFER MfTIGAT/ON AREA 1 ------- R16 (SINGLE !FAMILY) I -r- 1 -I I ;': I ' I 1-· I I I I I -.s I I I ' EX HOUSE EX HOUSE EXISTING LOT LINE TABLE LINE L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 LS L7 LB L9 L10 L 11 L12 L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 L19 L20 L21 L22 L23 L24 L25 L26 BEARING DISTANCE S 88'03'21" E N 01'34'22" E N 88'40'32" E S 01'49'33" W S 88'03'31" E S 01'49'33" W S 48'56'03" W N 68'11'55" W S 14'39'14" [ N 80' 44' 38" E S 01'50'43" W N 80'45'43" E S 01'50'43" W N 88'02'33" W S 14'39'14" E N 88'02'36" W N 01'34'22" E N 88'01'34" W N 01'25'36" E N 88'01 '34" W N 01'25'22" E N 88'01 '34" W N 01'25'36" E S 88'01'34" E N 01'34'22" E N 14'31'39" W EX (SINGLE FAMILY) EX HOUSE 81.06' 63.73' 157,38' 153.96' 300.00' 272.87' 213.09' 207.34' 377.01' 275.35' 30.57' 1 0.19' 120.46' 194.89' 206.92' 259.99' 30.08' 254.96' 141.01' 225.24 90.01' 149. 73' 51.00' 630.65' 706.08' 292.30' EX HOUSE I I_ ----J _J I ~. ---. _J I _I __ _ 150' --.c.... __ ----------_i __ _ 75' 1· 75' ------------ --------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD ANY FIELD DEVIATION FROM ENGINEERING PLANS. THESE RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT ON CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND TURNED OVER TO THE ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF PROJECT. --·. ',, ",? ,~; C ~,', r> ','.?,", < --,-------cr-75' r- I EX ' I -1 I HOUSE • I I ---=~ 75' EX HOUSE C - . ,, ,.,, ,. I I I _i A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 33, T 23 N, R 5 E, W.M. SOUTH PARCEL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: [PARCEL l] (619660-0520) LOT 8, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DN!SIONNUMBER 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT TO THE SOUTH 90 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET THEREOF. (SURVEY RECORDED JUNE 13, 2005 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20050613900009. [PARCEL 2] (619660-0540) LOT 9, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS, DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47 RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE WEST 375 FEET. APPLICANT: BREND TRAN (619660-0520) 15437 139th Ave SE RENTON, WA 98058 (206) 478-5902 EDWARD WILSON & NANN BUSSELLE (619660-0549) 17844120thAve SE RENTON, WA 98058 (425) 235-6008 CIVIL ENGINEER: PREFERRED ENGINEERING, LLC STEVE LEE, P.E. 4238 SW 314th St FEDERAL WAY, WA98023 (206) 501-5708 PLANNER: PK ENTERPRISES ATTN: PHILLIP K!TZES 23035 SE 263rd St MAPLE VALLEY, WA 98032 (206) 227-7445 I I EX HOUSE I 1 EX HOUSE L_ -----~ PURVEYORS: WATER SEWER TELEPHONE POWER GAS CABLE REFUSE NOTES: SOOS CREEK SOOS CREEK QWEST COMMUNICATIONS PSE PSE COMCAST WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS: 619660-0520, 619660-0540 TOTAL LOT AREA: 2.57 acres ZONING:R-6 ALOWED NUMBER OF LOTS/UNITS: 15 TOTAL LOTS SHOWN: 8 MIN LOT SIZE: 3,343 sq ft MAX LOT SIZE: 6,049 sq ft AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 4,198 sq ft RECREATION AREA REQ'D: 390 x 8 -3,120 sq ft RECREATION AREA 'TRACT A' PROVIDE: ???? sq ft BOUNDARY SURVEY: FIELD VERIFIED TOPOGRAPHY /SENSITIVE AREAS: FIELD VERIFIED .. I \ \ OONTC>U=I INTERVAL • 2' DATUM VERT: NAVD88 DATUM HOR: NAVD83 SCA! E· 1•-40' -----,4() 20 0 ,40 BO LU8S002l ' '·-·-"~---' ,. rs. ~ ' \\ I \ • r. I I \ I l \' \ \ K.C. D.D.E.S. REVISIONS NO. DESCRIPTION/DATE BY 1 1ST suaumAL (PREL.) 2/28/08 2 4 ~ a.. ~ 0 :c CJ) g I 00 z ~ t:. z 0 ~ ~ 0.. <( ~ z 0 (/) > 0 CD ::J (/) ~J1AIN 'ILF COPY ST • 0 ~ ~ 0:: 8 z z :::> JOB NO.: 2007-200 OWG. NAME: PRE-GR01.DWG DESIGNED BY: STL DRAWN BY: JK CHECKED BY: DP DATE: 12/28/07 DATE OF PRINT: PREGR-1 1 OF 2 SHEETS