Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutShort Plat File No 28-76STOP STOP STOP STOP OTOP! DOCUMENTS UNDER THIS NOTICE HAVE BEEN MICROFILMED, DO WOT REMOVE NOTICE FROM FILE. NEW FILING SHOULD BE ADDED ON TOP OF NOTICE. PAGES REMOVED UNDER THE NOTICE FOR COPYING MUST BE RETURNED TO THE SAME PLACE UNDER THE NOTICE. STOP! STOP STOP STOP STOP BEGINNING OF FILE “hot Dt CITY OF RENTON PLAT APPLICATION / _<_suort PLAT ___MAJOR PLAT ___ TENTATIVE ____ PRELIMINARY FINAL + FILE NO. £8-7e FEE § RECEIPT NO. SM NO. PUD NO. APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7: 1. Plat Name & Location Tho Monroe Ave Lb ah lends 3 he / ties 4A df d. tle tu « No. Lots 7. Total acreagesp 4 fn. zoning Co ae? . owner ary Jd ast Devue 2 Ps Phoné_ 25.5 °-5 /65~ Address St ee 2B e2iSen lu LY NE ends i, i = GL Aan 4. Engineer vo Phone Address 5. Underground Utilities: Yes No Not Installed Telephone a 4 _ Electric a a _ Street Lights __ i _ Natural Gas ke __ _ TV Cable a oti ——— 6. Sanitation & Water: £7 City Water ip Sanitary Sewers /_/ Water District No. /_/ Dry Sewers fs Septic Tanks 7. Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance 8. DATE REFERRED TO: ENGINEERING PARKS BUILDING HEALTH TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY FIRE COUNTY PLANNING BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER 9. STAFF ACTION: ___ SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED ___ TENTATIVE PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 10. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: ___PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED ___FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED ii. O€FTY COUNCIL ACTION: ___ PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED ___ FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 12. DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS: DATE DATE BOND NO. & TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT Planning Dept. Rev. 12/71 DATE REC'D Jis/7 (waiver B¥3~ wl // AFFIDAVIT — I, H ro Id ont Doane 3 ter Sp, , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this \\_ day of Avguck , 1946 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Reutin ‘ ‘ , Le ae \ereuk ty. Wdblee hare pe, (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) SE2 Zeors on bday AE. (Address) (Address) KEave Ton » CLASH. (City) (State) (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that” Eu, foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been foun ign at thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the nba pee ctens of the Renton Planning Department ic governing the sf iingl| | guch ap Lieation. y:_ LM Date Received Renton Planning Dept. 2273 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. ShoeT Khar. we 76 Environmental Checklist No. E£CF-/EY-76 PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: a Declaration of Significance [_]Joeciaration of Significance C] Declaration of Non-Significance @ Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. . The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1 BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Ba ld y Dede fase 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: Sie Breiseh Wee Af. Peden) Wo opie Pe ie oe 3. Date Checklist submitted Ge [Ja Se 4. Agency requiring checklist (-/ ry ot ke, teor - Flan. Comyn. 5. Name of proposal, if applicable: Ch Arn fe Zan Lng from ae fz Se 2 Stat fi Leh v/s ny 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): ae mn ply d ivide the Li t Lh Fa a, wear Ons 6} sare jour ve ee pO: Z My Fe Yeon tired e4 d Sa 23S: alsa feupe § ban’ -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed 15 give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal) 262 Maen roe oe between Lith ~ Vth foal 20¢! (20,300 34 Le aa a Bl fe ee 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal: So SVig hoa Ss Jor SA, ie ea Whey approver PIN es P 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for ae Aa a (federal, state and local--including rezones): Shoe Plat Permit Rezone fa ak tu oe ace Planning ee ee LS S/Qy 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion,~¢r further activity related to or connected with this proposal?) If yes, explajn: No - Wo gun) Phe ec oe, Property hot hee ecsary to ex stun / A go Oli Sz and] CX ISHN 1B ees Bet") ni know / ¢ “ Ae by Prey eee affect th db GderG covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: la ( Raa ey 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future eae the nature of such application form: Oglers Lee: een SULVEY and Show t Plat Pla fae pipe S-fesn Pa Pay ae ro: ie fb be guurdsnen ts. Ll... ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) -€arth. will the ‘proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic sce substructures? Be ee YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- to covering of the soil? pct YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ae Yes MAYBE NO. (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any poe unique geologic or physical features? ee YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, ie either on or off the site? eesti YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? aN YES MAYBE Explanation: he (cea ‘tesidential LAr aes. re Shu ee oe dtea to pe So ld fr res, of ent tal papravemest G nel Improvement of existing structures. (3) Air. (c) Will the proposal result in: Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? The creation of objectionable odors? Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES Explanation: Ne tndu meas | USQAde a C1 Se Cy . as Will [M1 prove Water. (a) (b) (h) (i) Cire . Will the proposal result in: Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAYBE YES MAYBE YES MAYBE YES MAYBE VES MAYBE VES MAYBE YES MAYBE YES MAYBE YES MAYBE iene ees CK Ten SJ oe Va =z 0 a X Explanation: Ain cl Dit-2 © 6 Fey rs ta. Q d LQ Ceeth ra oak 6 hehtnd 2x1 sting Flora. oWTd-the ek Ge result in: (a) (d) Explanation: develaped Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, cro microflora and aquatic plants)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Ate a LS: HEE Pox ps, OR Ee piter- oe YES MAYBE NO- YES YES YES MAYBE MAYBE MAYBE eae NO oo NO ‘or NO Gq Grey Cl Lael 8 & Caryn Merc 1a } frit pe ges (6) (10) bh) SAS Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? MAYBE (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or / endangered species of fauna? a 0 (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Geterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? we Tg YES MAYBE } Explanation: Jat Cnn Ss Cred 7 ee not Pita e Qny of these. exatile Guywls eee ahons., ox G Ko Wh Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise aA Le YES MAYBE NO Explanation: N< + oe j ta fal Ue oe, LG Z OE oom Con Mec al Purp Du eS ee Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or i ‘ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: aC) Fa oo | ng — bi f) Wwouded HS) 1 ata aS will gees rope Ae Wasd 2d blac Lae SEIS iy ne Ot eas Land Use. Will the propos result in the alteration of the bf present or planned land use of an area? ly YES MAYBE NO Explanation: iS t P as Un Lh sae i ved VeSsidewtin? Jot. th Poetic. Commities, Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? er (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Caen Explanation: May be see. Ca FD Gy de CAPO Ge is ea Lyn py bemeat ot Lio 2 jax ofa ped Gren and Preseutares. Met aeion ee ihe release proposal involve a risk Te a itna: but not limited to, oi], pesticides, chemicals or radiation) ee in the event of an accident or upset conditions? i YES MAYBE NO Explanation: eS es Ee ee wah Grea fe e;d antic Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? — YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Pro ba M ly be lusced ba ‘sa Gitrd én Spat When Sal (12) +p Dap itode. | AW as d Let = (13) (14) (15) (16) 5 Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE Fa One Site LI fig (es t On Oe Sere ee a Qreg. mw Jat Sy 2s, See re” bade Explanation: Hoeiiceaivenscinekieniay: Will the proposal result in: Gp hecav (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? L~ MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Mises la Q. J to be in Ok pi eC GNC LENS 6 Tal be Sell ohne dat Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: = fo ) = fo ) res e€ d En is i 4 / Explanation: Gre a (a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NO (b) Police protection? i(ssy YES MAYBE NO (c) School's? ri VES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? iP YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? “ VES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? ee 2 Mmpra Ve ete tn ee Explanation: Ahnw LH (ony 4 rst C40 =, ob ¢g ON ae Energy. W111 the proposal result in: poet YES MAYBE NO (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? While «elon YES” MAYBE NO” the. W aa df ae. Feu Explanation: i . ; 2 5s Pehiind existing Or toy Li pick caf Utilities. Will the proposal regult in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: oe (a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? Lote MAYBE NO Bete ci hy backs thee (c) Water? =< m “v n = > ~< Cc m - < lo ) (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding ? mental health)? i YES MAYBE Explanation: es Wnt GANS Oe at ae add to ? i ‘ ey _hbeaut (A la pd OSes Si hx fe jict & Os. Ths ae B elon oF Lin pkebe. pame Lhe, (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive y site open to public view? | Saal : YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Aba pps VET ok Fd nol Gps The ROIS Uh a oa EON os 51 SON SA Sa eT ade Pk : e j Yeu } fo ee he (ee ears eo AS cart Tin. yar WIN) SS 2 le, i ae (is ol em (19) Recreation. Will the proposal resdit in an tmpact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES. MAYBE NO ‘Explanation: Miah Pt Obide Cec reag a GAIA vA i “~~ C2 pap .aoe tat os 2s | Ati’ : + Ctl Ca kK of pate P 0 / aD) 9p pao; Lo ad Cus (20) RSA ERED RIO OP Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? Soe / i YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Not that Hi be ct / oe J 7. me Ow, ae SIGNATURE “6% (d). “Sewer or septic tanks? ae 2 YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? i (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: M. na YL fy / ss Jol Qh deve/iped by The Purcha Sis A MAY BE fo~ I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Leb Meend Praag (signed) Harald le ae (name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 ROUTE SCHEDULE _§ PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED erate PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: REZONE wie a ; SITE APPROVAL JC short pLat_* 28-7 SPECIAL PERMIT SCHAIVER ) at w. $t3-7© SHORELINE MANAGEMENT \Agovp PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT . WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE, BEFORE Us {7L SIGNATURE OR INITAL DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENTAL DATE ne BUILDIN =~ \ TRAFFIC ENG? ~ ENGINEERI FIRE HEALTH REVIEWER'S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS: PLEASE SIGN THE E.1.W.: MEMORANDUM TO O Files DATE 11/4/76 FROM Willis Roberts SUBJECT HAROLD & DEANE PETERSON SHORT PLAT FILE NO. 28-76 and WAIVER OF OFF-STTE IMPROVEMENTS FILE NO. W-883-76 The applicants withdrew subject applications and were refunded appropriate fees on this date in view of Council action of October 18, 1976, denying their rezone request (file R-882-76) concerning the subject property. Renton City Council 9/20/76 Page 2 S Bo -# fe ie CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL Bicentennial Air Park Horizons '76 Committee Harold P. Peterson Rezone Appeal GS-1 to SR-1 Peterson Rezone Denial Request Economic Deve lopment Administration Resolution #2065 Authorizes EDA Funding Application Fire Station, etc. AUDIENCE COMMENT Bicentennial Airpark City Vehicles MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL APPROVE ALL ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. Letter from Soroptimist International of Renton, Corresponding Secretary Olive A. Stritmater, supported full credit to the Kiwanis Club of Renton for their years of work and funds raised toward the new park at Renton Airport, noting the name Kiwanis Bicentennial Air Park would be most appropriate. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR~THORPE, COUNCIL REFER LETTER TO THE AVIATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Letter from Lew Innocenti, Chairperson of the Renton Bicentennial- Diamond Jubilee Committee noted the last regular meeting of that committee and recommended formulation of a Renton Horizons '76 Committee, to which over 15 community volunteers have pledged sup- port. Mr. Innocenti announced the following charter: Coordinate and implement objectives from Renton's Town Meeting 5/8/76 at Renton High School; 4th of July Picnic at Liberty Park annually; Community interest in community events for community and national pride. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR-THORPE, COUNCIL REFER THIS MAT- TER TO THE MAYOR'S OFFICE FOR RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Letter from Harold and Deane Peterson, 562 Bronson Way N.E., regis- tered appeal of the Planning Commission denial of application for rezone of property located at 762 Monroe Ave. between N.E. Sixth and N.E. Seventh. The letter explained plan to divide the lot into two sections, providing pipestem egress and improve the existing house and garage on the front lot. The letter further explained procedure followed and objections to the denial. Upon advice from City Attorney Shellan, it was MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR DATE OF OCTOBER 18, FOR APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF THE PETERSON REZONE. CARRIED. Letter from Michael L. Smith, 3402 N.E. 7th St., requested Council deny Harold P. Peterson appeal of the Planning Comnission decision of 9/8/76.at which time Peterson request for rezone was denied. Mr. Smith's letter noted request made on behalf of his neighbors. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR-THORPE, COUNCIL REFER LETTER TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Letter from Mayor Delaurenti presented proposed Resolution authoriz- ing the Mayor and City Clerk to make application for certain Economic Development Administration funds on behalf of the city for four projects listed from the Local Public Works Capital Development and Investment Program of PL 94-369. The letter recommended application be made for 100% financing of each of the four projects in a total amount of $3,670,000. The letter noted the SW 43rd project being joint with Kent and EDA application would be made by Renton and shared equally with Kent. The letter explained the allocation of grant funds will be made by computer on a "point basis" without regard for local priority and against all other applications submitted, noting the city's best interests would be served by submitting several applica- tions in order that one or more may be funded. City Clerk Mead read the Resolution authorizing grant applications for the new main fire station, SW 43rd St. improvements, Talbot Hill pump station and water tie line to Rolling Hills, and the Cedar River Trail System. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL APPROVE RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAYOR AND RESOLUTION AS READ AUTHORIZING MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO MAKE APPLICATION FOR EDA FUNDS. CARRIED. Nancy Serry, President of the Renton Chapter of National Organization for Wonen, inquired of the organization's letter which had been pres- ented to the Saturday 9/11/76 Council meeting. Miss Berry called attention to the proposed name of "Amelia Earhart Park," and was advised by Mayor Delaurenti the letter was referred to the Aviation Committee and would be discussed at their meeting 9/21/76. Ralph Hart, 125 Wells Ave. N., objected to city personnel driving city cars back and forth to work. Mayor Delaurenti advised the matter has been reviewed in the past and a few employees are allowed to take cars home because of emergency calls, and that the matter would be further reviewed. A & 5 THE CITY OF RENTON kd Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 So = 2 CHARLES J. DELAURENT|, MAYOR @ PLANNING DEPARTMENT a 235-2550 we 7ED seprt MEMORANDUM September 16, 1976 TO: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director FROM: Michael L. Smith, Associate Planner RE: HAROLD PETERSON REZONE, SHORT PLAT, AND WAIVER REQUEST Late May: May - August: August 18: August 18-25: August 26-27: Initially reviewed with the Peterson's, the Assistant Planning Director, and the Mayor's Assistant the feasibility of the request, possible alternatives, ordinance require- ments, Planning Commission review procedures, and the hearings schedule. They were infor- med that although a proposal might appear to be acceptable, the final decision would be made by the Planning Commission after a public hearing. The outcome of the hearing was not, and could not be predicted at that time. Various Staff members talked to Mr. and Mrs. Peterson on several occasions, reviewing with them the application instructions, Plan- ning Commission procedures, and the need to justify their request for rezoning, propos- ing a pipestem lot subdivision, and waiver of off-site improvements request. Received applications for rezone, short plat, and written request for waiver of off-site improvements. Review and approval by various City Depart- ments. Publish, post, and distribute public notices of hearing. MEMO Harold Peterson September 16, 1976 Page Two September 8: September 10: MLS: vb Planning Commission Public Hearing and decision. Staff recommendation - approval. Letter to Petersons informing them of decision and appeal process. POreaiVED a a | nS: = i gt \ REGUL See Sr CTs Di pirige ZI Li 7 4 he SEP 15 1976 ay SY Os Az ’ (od 2 ot OF RENTON KS hy rf (’ _— . Tans. OFFICE eit jr lepber, JY, /9 76 se eS Sk ALA Ua tu [ Ce 1p be lei ade. \ bthaurt, hs * li tatant Mls (A/ hele / ea of yee Lf, ie, hws » Tee. pie LAd hey - oy “lav sale Toone 23 tsp Co athe rel - ; ode - on sfrswer 4 Ad nade poe , Lez Rt oe bz % “ y _ Le Nip hbevdlad fi / sod a friberh 1- Alawad hdgide : ‘, a fs “+ 9 Pre Lf pte a < Es lv- N L« SYR Php tok D, 5 ap - AL Fp put 7} i. Jl 7} ‘A A af ie pf Phe he ag i of ne Ct = i fe - Z (-Cfe- / he (hg i ee ; 47 2) yf va Ay d _L, 2 we At od J) we Cute # LL Ede toed . iene “ Fi “ 7 . J. + tua y get ak as weptees 2 7 al ah heel a batl oll ‘ ee a oe pidale 2 fur = : _ ‘ Le AH ute i aod ia) + he : eel ty torpeper Bik a re oe 2 | “ + ie gf f es L i r 5 Py a f, =~, iA ise cure ee SL are ee A demi P= ees aa Pt nO LLY EEL id > / 7 “ uy uf fr o Ha. yt a : a { a See ra eo ont a 7 ss f: Re (AfteaIb GLB ide Cbs tdanted. Athdy g_lefrga Ceptttd Ge # s Fa i, . . 4 f Z 5 a a ae —_—s% Z _ . tal ; KS ne ae oe « ae eat ot ~ pra, hati Gin daty BhA neh? (<a gf jf. we Py ‘ ‘ , pf * ‘ ’ - fe 0 Lhd ee wt trd¢riatle- Fatt fp of. v “a 5 Te . ; / fl Fé L. wh tg fg) 4 / Lif oye? 2s “a PO AAA A de agate Mf) he tile — Se tb RAD Ah et Z ton / Z (ALY sO a 7 pe 44 4 f dl a ie ad ake ae ad é gt I Put (pit ttt TT pet Abed PD Leh fk. a" 1 4 p- {7 Pf va ? ‘ Wed a lea if PA Z LAL j 1 2 7 Loulak pe Fe gee whois C., Lad ee eee ne L: giehe ‘ v4 z" ms 4 ac 7 Baal ot Ye YA A = OO PAF % & Ae oe vs ALA hte at fie Y I py ; P f vw CAEL. Dod Oe, a L Gens aed ge af Ae atttce AL Ca dally a 2 ati Ladhe , doth FY, then tg ie. Mt at bute ae ie aA th TAA he PGES Rae | A ody ( Aarliiede Aha hthee 2, aah i aul o~ a : [Pbiare:ogforde Ford Farha. ( a, eas Ui a Lip. / pt her joo F ds te Aten) - fe VAP lp . ple f) fn 7 ie AA 41 224 Bea tibial dru teberey Reed. eg fy - y y / Af: i tbsp A 4 LOS LOL Atte lt atid wets Sf — » Sande oe Fs , - we wt gt the vara Ay ital Aha Ltaahbe: ait J oe LL ADs aa a litte... a . . op w# Ce pe fod : Lil. full . ls, . Lttittihe fi Loy oy A Drills . LY? Ad | fA ae “ t p —= Sifplo- Aebeeadine Le - Lor PUL eéL Go pnls a) _ ete geek Aud Aepasled baie pe ate fg? te A SELL La ath Z LAB Syst AALELS wie eae ao LG ae Nc Lbfbeg lh Aietiaa ait Ahi, AULA, WA 2. 4 oa “sf Et AL Y few anh toa bey rwtl - deed Haniel faa he haw App ogy — MLA Catiae ced Le (wile gs roe a Ly. Asal, hte _ a fod 2 fig _- kid 2) aaNpaay athe Bag Let AA ‘ P . til 24; peg Y ppengtte if pate "(ALE ind the al, # aff ya - MEA Lbea Bhar auntles Lf WALA watt clpes - Ar J ie At ne fewer Gbz Aki 2 peer ys Lye . or dloas i al Lo ple Ln, La. ra “ Lhe le > Z. - : We shee r ate hope i ors Clu ‘ A eet woe whe a wl andl Bien, Gis oe acenToos LS otieae hfe late plo tiie Chiper tae prwe® poet Atwwoldl - a tht_2. Aad. Hor aA te, ar AAs pe Henle Food oF 4 he ne th. fig = Lal : ff vA \ YU \ “ (C ' « \ AS s ) £6 | og geet ae aL G th a” PPA ahd ems Z Cote Ook. Ce hcl df Fe “pe fe ars Pri fltee oe bite cece afl samedi b /¢ Ae TUL CAs? he Mb iets ot Al Aj ‘eta tf othe td Qe ber Se ee, WA ; din de de. _ eke oqucny Forme a Jo fnew F wg? = seta Ht ke “a Wie , = “hast - Ala’ n WY . “s J Htrdele piffenit pip AAG : 9 ; a L Kms tae: Jt te be hee Wa oleh Uoewll “fe hide / fo p 4 yo ; < ) 7 hihi, er . AY a “ae Kervtgpt tore a Ly [hod Ah mM - fait of ; é fo. y 3 (he Potts l Bil » petiole, 1) S ee oe a is = ‘ £ ~ ea. vu . " . re c J c | , ge “7 nL er ce Le th ’ spe ge x a) - = ne eat cal Tee be ra i, | . . - oe ——“) ¢ t a =a | a 4 Ltt - late SG ae 7 ra ; VA 4 “ . f / Z Zi ) a. —, 4 > i. Z J. 3 — Lae vA x Po Les AMY ge Lo Vie es 7 ; ; S r. ‘7 ff i deol CADE AA ~ 2 7 oOo "i a Let A Peon) A Fi ai al Fa Pa eee 9 Goth Rtn LPP La Ls - JU z Le 4 AA 4 <2 at Me b Sy yy ats we, ly A Cos Checg, Jf LL. pow iS -I AE- wey 2s 7 ~ ok . é or poe aan cone Jee (a Ube,” s 7 A. 4 a a aia ptt ois seemed (Kee 4 ie is in, yo (LP Abe CFD tee thre iis _ a "og Ss tonctbn — Ad pd hf . A Ltt F sag — Cf che dt fe Piethay gf) .~ | . F: wd is. bs i -_ CA ~fVL SY SOL ste otirctodde ” ate tata TL, ., oe <7} 7 ~ : ge Y A - 3 lok Z A Bhph ivr 3 Lie: } a N Cea. ti Olae i A DuHobivs <f ae er : . 4 y CA nk atl ABLALY avi des ay i le i fe a The CHS NY Aakd a Phe A thad B Co. Voda hae ele bs die . ; ft “Zo fi ‘ - rid ye. 7 Canes Gl Hei a tee Y iM. ad Mente x “ Pion - z mk eel, 4 ° Lek eee Cefcef Pen lal * a, fy es hte Ge tng la Le elles 7a Lg hr Aycur Fhe. Cb le white rs YA Zz AL. Za ee a, = Z me _—— f-* nid — eS ead ‘ ees fe ~ * Fis adhe “hein E UPL KB oA WW papery , i is ee a Zo ore AO 2332 2 rug: ees in iat “an aed ne ahs / ge” A a 2! -. a9 4 PO , 7 yp XD ~ ye i A ye" ‘ . Saale Burp > Bowe re aa LD fe Joy Fanp-3 . —% YR" at ; 2 ager’ ai Po Loucrstf wa ry” ke Lara fre ODPL DIT I WA 47 pre OF ile i: pope a TIE 69979 ATO TP OU ? VA GV . “) ae ca on ry cy “y ‘oo yy po p e r PO M . CO V v ’ ry ¥v ER BOP? oP”) ) , es a ” aia at: oye frrerr, can ve Ch re PP O TY ro ae eee apes 0 Leyes ae 7 fe AOE Pr at, ¢ wa y Bins S$ FP pe hig f* eas. hm OY JOE, GROOT TE EI LG DG ° Aas A 6 as ane NP POE ofl i ie ae) 9 rege ides 72 Lety-+ a am we ee . Od Pe ae, ae = eae Perey eVi7Y Yo WI S T Y 7 Ce r y / YJ S G \ N Pi er WW E )* Y NX ) SS ay XN 5: Po r g y ’ a UI I 7 we on NSA or gl al yee ~ Pym? ge get we OGY “Frey Fa te YS 2 J P- 7 Ag 4 os a KF? € <3? re ce VR 3 - ae ie PUNO SS a oo & % pO OPI PEEP? ~"G — my “for ae OS ans ea ten @ Te 7 ig GP wre ee, po | fe pre get lz fr wh N j “S 3 9 Ay e 3x 7 0 =m ” . i wv F ey er oe eo) ye. WEL og Gf ? ie Pte i A og 4 ? ° / : a ea GA yet PAIL — GVVOVY ao ey een pee Pe ia ) ; Le - Yo ( ee oa fC ae, a ae ee REN tony to: a . P ee a af ll he it Mae a a ee 1 = ¥ Cy r 7 2 Y J \ { ~ \ oe PP Wp A, / ge -* if “Ff . P, BS tO Fp. OP VOTE pees uv 5 Gy = prayers Sipe (PBI) aes oe! aoe \ “ aia an x % we pe a ee a A ae af a ae TIVTLLVIFY Yy5 ; S5 ™ ° - ef I Le -7607/ es 592 Dt Bf? ‘eo 4 i n “o Pea?) SOG? LD oe. Cf. oe el pe we Poe a _ aaa ae ee | ° Pref, Z 4° hax 4 (MR ir fe Dy pe - pee py Asef Bs PEPIN Pp FI? YS PET poo Ser 7 ee. A pete joD ce) a a Vif a oi Cad 7 Qiryel 7, bp a Vy if bs, [f LZ a Lobo a bo i Ti”g ye * ey ee. — tg dF ” yg ra p ee As PL? PAT rere for Ve wae G pe | ht eae pra Z Z) pe Olen aye “a, yet (x Yigg PPI 9) POL TLL Peay, peg Pa 2A pI Pe an Oy we il +H a Pee CT” ony pom se 4 “Witty _—>~ r ae 7 : PZ. ~~ PEO iS fo ta ian a. oy, ue Pay on Les ed lll a ip r- cat | Oe THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR @® . PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 September 10, 1976 Harold Peterson 562 Bronson Way N.E. Renton, WA 98055 RE: APPLICATION FOR REZONE - #R-882-76 Dear Mr. Peterson: The Planning Commission at its September 9, 1976 public hearing denied your application for rezone of the property located at 762 Monroe Avenue N.E. The Commission, after consideration of the facts of the proposal, determined that the request was not compatible with surrounding land uses, and that further subdivi- sion of the property would be detrimental to adjacent properties and the unique character of the area. You have the option of requesting to the City Council an appeal of this ruling within ten (10) days from the date of the ruling. Such an appeal must be submitted in writing to the Planning Depart- ment. If you have further questions, please contact this Department. - Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen P OE Dd - / or at Michael L. Smith Associate Planner MLS:vb t——? 7 Je Ler Sov Ae teve. Friday, September 10, 1976 Long wait pays off Record-Chronicle - Section A - Page 3 Planners reject higher density Four hours of waiting paid off Wednesday night for a group of Highlands residents protesting a rezone in their neighborhood. Residents near the 700 block of Monroe Avenue Northeast waited, from 8 p.m. until nearly midnight to be heard by the Renton Planning. Commission Wednesday. But when neighbors told the com- mission they feared rezoning of property owned by Harold P. Peterson at 762 Monroe Ave. NE to cut minimum lot size from 35,000 square feet to less than one-third that size would hurt the neighbor- hood, the commissioners at last listened. Neighbors led by Mike Smith, 3402 NE Seventh, said the area is ‘‘unique . country surrounded by the bustling city.” He said permitting . Peterson to subdivide his lot would be poor planning that could lead to further subdivision of the large lots ~—- most in the development at least 30,000 square feet. The commission agreed. By unanimous vote, planning commissioners rejected Peterson’s request to subdivide his property into an 8,000 square foot lot and a 10,000 square foot lot served by a ‘‘pipestem”’ driveway. Peterson had asked permission to use a 20-foot wide driveway past the house on the smaller front lot to provide access to tthe 10,000 square foot piece of property from Monroe Street. Peterson wasn’t at the Wednesday night meeting to defend his request. Now, if he wants to try again for permission to subdivide, he’ll have to appeal to the Renton Council. tad STAFF REPORT PAGE FOUR SEPTEMBER 8, APPLICATION: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF ZONING CODE: COMMENTS: DECISION 1976 CONSIDERATIONS: REZONE, FILE R-882-76, REZONE REQUEST FROM GS-1 TO SR-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HAROLD AND DEANE PETERSON 762 MONROE AVE. N.E. GS-1 (35,000 Sq. foot min. lot size) 4-729; 4-704 1. Property consists of approximately one-half acre and contains an existing small house and garage. 2. The rezone request is necessary in order to provide standard single family residential zoning and lot sizes so that the property can be subdivided into 2 parcels. 3. The proposed short plat will consist of 2 lots, a front lot consisting of apprdéximately 8,000 sq. ft. with the existing small house and garage to remain, and a rear lot con- sisting of approximately 10,000 sq. ft. and served by a 20 foot wide by 100 foot deep pipe-stem, 4, The area across Monroe Ave. N.E. and west of the subject site is presently zoned R-1. The area surrounding the site is zoned GS-1. However, there have been parcels rezoned to both SR-1 and R-1 in the general area. 5. Existing land use consists of single family residential around the site. Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, is located directly across the street to the west. 6. The existing lots in the immediate area within Stewart Acre tracts subdivision have not been extensively subdivided to date. Approval because it is consistant with existing single family development in the area, existing zoning, and the Comprehensive Plan for the area. BY a STAFF REPORT PAGE SIX SEPTEMBER 8, 1976 APPLICATION: WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED FOR A 3 LOT SHORT PLAT, FILE W-881-/6 APPLICANT: JOHN B. WEERS LOCATION: S.W. CORNER OF ABERDEEN AVE. N.E, AND N.E. 12TH ST. ZONING; G-7200 COMMENTS: 1. The property is presently zoned G-7200. 2. The applicant propose to subdivide property into 3 parcels approximately 8600 sq. ft. each. 3. The property located on the northwest corner of Aberdeen Ave, N.E. and N.E. 12th St. will be short platted in the near future. This may be reason to require improvements on both plats. 4. There are similar improvements within a reasonable distance that are related to recent plats in the area. ‘ 5. The Engineering Division has expressed con- cern for controlling of drainage from the plat. DECISION CONSIDERATION; Recommend approval of waiver for a maximum 2-vear neriod or until adjacent property to the north is short platted, whichever comes first, subject to the posting of a performance bond or certified check for the estimated cost of construction of required improvements. All cost estimates shall be prepared by the Engineering Division. ENDING OF FILE “hot Pat —— ODB-TG_-