Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport #1 - 3 of 5Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet @-Knng Comity Depmrtment of Devalopment a. Enlllronmental Semc:es 900 Oakesdale Awnua Southwest Renlon, Washinglon 9805&-1219 20&-298-fll!OO TIY .208-296-7217 Projed Name: ··--C Evendell 5 Location: SE 136th and 157Ui Ave SE Clearing greater than or equal to 6,000 boani rest of timber'? . X 111'5 ffyas, Forest Practice Pezmil Number. (RCW76.09) Pagel of 9 ___ no L04GF042 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Date: Project No.: (L;;ooJLl j;.IUR 05 Activity No.: L04Sl1B8 Note: All prices include labor, equipment. materials, overhead and profit. Plicea are from RS Means data adjusted for the Seattle area · or from local SOIU08S if not included in the RS Means database . o~Il . ~ l,- 1 (fa/ ,J . Jr'IS' r' ivO I• u(V•· ·v" /' 11.-,, ~ :'tf ·1A• \•< 104sl1888QW.l!Js Chaclt out the DDES Web alts llf W\\Wffl&tmkc.gov/ddes Unll prices updalad: 02/121t12 V8n;iorr. 04/22/D2 Report Dale: 6/'l4/2005 i ~ ~ • n u ij • ~ u ~ ~ " ~ • ~ . ~ ~ ~ l • l C • C Site !mprovement Bond Quantity Worksheet 16 11/4"minus 85.45 CY ESC-4 $ 8.08 CY 275 Elll:avation-bulk ESC.5 $ 1.50 CY 15000 !Fence. sl1l ESC-8 SWOM 5.4.3. 1 $ 1.38 LF 2400 !Fence. Tllll1pOraTY (NGPE ESC.7 $ 1.38 LF ESC-8 SWDM 5.4.2.4 $ 0.59 SY 1Jll!l! Mash ESC-9 SWOM·S.4.2.2 $ 1.45 SY ESC-11) SWDM 5.4.2.1 $ 2.0, SY ESC-11 SWDM 5.4.2.1 $ 0.53 SY 50000 ESC-12 $ 10.70 LF ESC-13 $ 18.10 LF ESC-14 $ 20.70 LF 200 Jl.ed ESC-15 SWDM 5.4.2.3 $ 2.30 SY ESc-16 WSDOT ~13.1(2\ $ 39.08 CY ESC.17 SWDM 5.4.4. 1 $ 1,464.34 Each Reel< c:ans1ruction Enlrance, 1 DO'x15'x1' ESe-18 SWOMSA.4.1 $ 2,928.68 Each 1 Sed!mant pond riser assembl· ESC-19 SWDM 5.4.5.2 $ 1,949.38 Each 1 ESC-20 SW0M5.4.5.1 $ 17.91 LF ESC-21 SWOM 5.4.5.1 · $ 68.64 LF ESC-22 SWOM 5.4.2.4 $ 0.51 SY ESC-23 SWOM 5.4.2.5 $ 6.03 SY ESC-24 SWDM 5.4.2.5 $ 7.45 SY HR ~ tl\ev't,, 1"(JJ -S)Ml,J/>,{,,€,.., f'Prc;t ~-(,l,f . c-0 1/../ r,j ESC SUBTOTAL: . 30% CONTINGENCY & MOB1UZATION: . ESCTOTAL: COLUMN: Page2of 9 I04s11Bl!BaW.Xls Clter:k out Uw ODES Web stta at www.metT01rc,qovtgges 1 1 1 1 1 1 26500. 1 1 1 ,,o~.'-v~zz "f ') "L6"s."7 $ 8 . \?fo1o~A'( A . 1 Unit pri""" upda!ad: 02/12/02 Veraion: 04/22/02 Report Cele: 6124/2005 <... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;;; <I "" ~ "" 'r- ~ <J .. lL • ~ .. " Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet ~ ~ ~ n " ·n a u ~ 0 u 350 2,985.50 600 5,118.DO 1050 8,958.50 ZIIID 17,oeo.ool " ~ Gl-3 $ 0."6 SY . I r .... RaaovaJ Gl-4 $ 8,1178.18 · Acre 2 17,752.32 2 17,752.32 9 79,11115.44 13 11S,3&0.oa ---Gl-5 s HC CY 5750 81125.00 57$G 8,525.00 r GI-S $ 4.08 CY 400 1,1124.IXI 850 2,639.00 1150 · 4,1169.00 22IIO B,93,2.00 ~ r Gl-7 $ 18.5S LF C Gl-9 $ 13.44 lF r u GI-.S $ 1,271.Bt Each ~ !l Gl-10 $ 12.12 LF ~ ~ Gl-11 $ 22.57 C'(. ~ $ 25.48 C'( $ S7.85 C'( $ 54.31 SY $ 74Jl5 SY $ t:J2.48 SY $ 2.02 SY $ 0.115 SY $ 135.13 Emi I 51 875.81!.[ . 121 1,821.58 ~ 7.'18 GJ-ij $ 1aa211 ! ~ I ,1 791.281 zj 1,578.521 ti 788.28! Acre 1ers\ Gl-24 $ B5.1B HR GI-"' $ 7.5! SY Ol-2' $ 8.33 SY 8.19 · SY . . ~ 44.18 Sf 2500 110,400.00 2500 110.- J * ~ 9.49 SF 1125 10,878.25 ---·--·-· ----- Page3ofU SUBTOTAL 144,901.98 49,572.,41) 178,!599.Zl -3~ ;;> , ,5"5",-(:t-.a~ • ' ' ~ ,lf ,Jc.(. C-1' l"'(>Vu'.-...0 x ""1., -<1 I'\ ~ vi"\{ · ,Jo .0 " ( :;\' l O .( 0 Uni! pricaa l4lda!Bd: 02/1 W2 ·KCC27AIIU1h-Olll'f "'8 bond-. Version: 412211)2 I04ol188BQWJda Check_olll Ille DDES web a/le GI www.me'l!!!,C1J.Ovld<J.es Report Dair. 8l2Al2005 4' wtdo IIUICl>lne 1oi»i .C Omdinll, 4' widc llllldina > .CR.......ilDI, l ,Bal1lcalo,l)pol/l -~ 4"·1hick. dcnlclilion and al Sld.....iJc, 5" lhlck 1:-i;-._-..andal•i ISHping, per Blall IMmop1adc. IS\iJ!lna. 4· n,!Jec-line foila4ol'9 'ltCC 'DA aullloriZn cmlyona l>oml noduction. I04sl188BQW Jdo . Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet $ ! $ ~ ~ $ 1.38 41.14 :nos 4$,05 1127 9.59 13.58 244 258 us 1.119 D.ll!I . 7.53 3D.52 27,73 34.94 34.85 85.28 S.B2 238 0.26 SUBTOTAL SY LF lF LF LF LF LF J.F LF LF LF SY SY SY SY SY SY Eaeh Ech SF LF 25Clll 604 1:100; 12CI 5800 3300 43,7i1.00 24,225.DD 1,229.7tl 33,872.0ll 82!5 28,231.0ll 187G 85,512.eo 285.80 50 119.00 1,-4-00.00 l!0,712.38 137,1153.50 Chem< out fl,e DOES Well aif8 GI www.mettoltc.aoefddos :1 :::1 1925 58,751.00 ,m 811,5'12511 192,271UIO Unil prlcu updated: 02/12102 Vereb,: 4/22/02 Report Dale: 8124/2ll05 C & " 0 C § (J • • ~ (' ~ r ~ u • g " • ~ ~ u • 0 , ~ • a Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet RS-31$_ 8.75 RS-4IJ. 17.24 RS-5]_1 13.30 RS-81 f 111.6!1 ,CRoed,a°,4"roc:k,Qty.....-2500SY!RS-7! $ 15.81 ,C Rosi. 6", fnt 25!lO SY . .. !RS-81 $ 14.57 IA.C Rood, 5", QIJ. 0-25CD SY 13.94 ,CRoal, II", Firsl2500 SY 16.78 111.12 $ 9.21 '-11.41 $ 7.53 .l 21.51 PCCRoall, ll",rm~°""251JDSY '-21.87 ,ThlclcsnodEdge $ 8.811 P<110Sd8 SUBTOTAL 'KCCZ1Aaulhorimo_cmly_ bond,eduoti,n . R14s1188BQW.llb SY SY ~ SY 2711 SY 250D 49,225.00, SY 10DD 15,810.00 SY SY SY SY SY 1<4681 13,501.SS SY SY SY SY LF eµef .> ' 1,1, ':JS', ~ \. 4S,10D.OO IMiO 3,51Yl.2IJ 8lO 56,679.20 24,9911.COf 31150 27D 11134 1DOD 4,-409.eo 010 34,SZT.eo 4.4DII.OO 1~ 7 ''fv'lr'f.S'z... '* Pr<~ PrL\r'-'i.L-n-t..1 < , rl V 1.,p,<4,, fo fl< : S £..; ,l J , Tl<\ ,, / , , ·~ . , .,• , . /,, ciuoclr oul Ille IJDEJ Wol> -at www.mflllol<cAOvlddg .I'' q, ::- ;-. ' l.lnil priasa updated: 02/12/02 Venlan: 4l22Al2 Report Dais: G/24l2l)05 ~ Q! i ~ ~ I i ;;;;, u: ... ~ ... F ~ u ~ " 't Ii( ~ cs Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet 240.74 481.48 2 o.s Is 452.:U ! Eec:t> -~ 1 452.34 2 D--4 D-6 D·8 D-7 D-B D-9 D-10 D-11 0-12 D-13 D-14 Cloanout. PVC, 4• 0·15 a.....t,PVC,6" D-18 ClomDul, PVC.a• 0·17 Ctdw,rt, PVC. 4" D·1B iC..heol. PVC. 8" D· 19 0·20 D-21 D-22 0·23 D .24 D .215 D-28 D-27 D-28 D-29 D-30 0·31 Pago8al 9 "'KCC27A-anlym,eiiondlDICtion. -..IIIIIIQw• $1,257.84 $ 1,433.$9 $ 21t.13.57 $ 438.52 $ 2,192.114 $ 4B<IS! $ 2,351.62 $ 5ll8.54 $ 3,212.84 $ tllli2.2I $ 3IIO.OSI $ 130.55 $ 174.llO $ ~19 $ 8.64 8 12.eO $ 13.33 $ 21.n $ 17.25 $ 28.45 $ 32.73 $ 37.74 $ 53.3$ s 71A5 s 112.11 s 140.IIS s Zlll.4$ $ 3D2.BB SUBTOTAL Each 12 18,091.BBI 221 27,il811.08J .. -111 Eooh Eadl 8 10.288.56 11 18,302.13 3 FT 29 12,659.0S 9 3,928.68 17 Each FT Each 1 2,351."' 1 FT 1 538.54 Eoch FT Each 3 1,09827 Each Eaell . 53 Each LF LF LF LF LF l.F u: LF LF LF LF LF LF LF 48,587.95 52,!50A1 Check out lhoDDES 111'<111 silo tJt www.mrdrokc.gov/ddu 4BIA81 I I fl04.68 1S,834.o4 .45 . 56,.5513.BO 11,180.71 7,420.84 .80 2.351.52 2 4.703.04~ 1 538.$4J 3 1,D98..27-1 . I 9.2111.70 53 9,21!!1. 7llJ 40~.97 1!!M!.35 Unit prices IJl>llated: 02112/02 Varalcot 4122m Report Oats: 6l24l2D05 <. § I\ ., I\ g ~ ~ <S ~ ~ (' ~ ;;; u r ![ ~ r :, C ~ (J r " , ' r ~ Site lmprovement13ond Quantity Worksheet D-34 $ 37.34 LF D-3!5 $ 44.51 LF 0-38 $ 81.Q7 LF D-37 $ 1114:18 LF 0-:U $ 137."3 LF 0-39 $ 1511-42 LF 48" 0-40 $ 175.94 LF 0-41 $ 10.70 LF I I I I I fflDI 288801 27001 28800 ic..-tCPP,8'--0-42 $ 18."IC LF 'c.,1,ort, CPP, 12"" 0-43 $ 20.70 LF 51B 10=9 2181 45148.7 935 tm4.5 3834 75221.B C11r-t, CPP, 15" 0-44 $ 23.llC LF 51) 11SO -73 1879 123 ,11arl' Culwlt, CPP, 111" 0-45 $ 27.60 LF 165 -165 Cul...t CPP,24" 0-46 $ 36.BD LF 5111l 21675.2 588 21815.21 Culwlt,CPP.30' 0-47 $ 4UD LF iCulwrt. CPP ~ 38' --0-46 s 56.20 LF 0-49 $ B.08 CY I ool -4041 I I I I eor 4041 0-llll $ 25.88 LF 0-51 $ 22.eo LF D-52 $ 2.40 SY D-53 $ 74.75 HR D-54 $ 1.1105.40 -0.55 $ 14.01 SY I I I eol 7CD.5I I I 51ll 700.61 ·•o-68 $ 1,045.19 Eat 0-67 $ 1,085.58 -111" 0-58 $ 1.148.18 E.ad1 I l I 11 1148.181 I I 1t 1148.181 0-59 $ 39.08 CY 0-50 $ 1,0DD.oO -0-81 $ 211.97 Eacl! 0-62 $ Z31.ZT EAc;I\ 0-83 $ 2118.80 Ear:11 I l l 1J. 2118.&gj l I ti ---~.811 D-84 $ Sll<l.84 Eacl! P<p7ol8 SUBTOTAL 331l51:I! 4S941.25 52798,5 135691.55 Unit pricea updal8d: 02/12R>2 "ICCC27A-onfym,ellmxlll!duclian. Vera1an: 02)02 ~-Cbecl!. out tho DDES Wall ala af www,m2!!2!c,11ovld!f!:s Report Dale: IVl4/2ll05 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Wl-21_$ 30.52 f SY 140 4212e1 5001 15.200.00I 5ll 1.526.00 Wl-3! ! 5,II00.00 I LS 1_[ 5,000.001 WI -•U 5.000.00 f LS 1 5,000.00 Wl-51$ 50.00I FT eo 3.000.00 •. Wl-e l ,(l) wr.11 I ~I I I \ I 11'.,o.-c ,-----. -- Pego8of9 Wl-8 Wl-9 \'ll-10 \({~1,~b.C.O SUBTOTAL 4,212.80 ~ ?~~'>·q<' C. ~ 5UB10TAL(S1JIIIALLPAll£ll): 3~ 7.)'f fl'. IO%COHJINOENCY&MOBiLIZATlON: lll..>o# .,,',~ iS'tfil.&,a .. w- GRANDTOTAt: ~0 .,.,~(a,-, i~ \osf!!?• f<~ COLUWI: --C 'KOC 27Aillllhorizlos only-bond Rldutli<n 11Moit81BQW."'8 . Clleclt oul llloDDES Wob.;,. at WWWa/lJelTo{rc,qoylddos 9,526.00 / \ "'2,4 oooe. 31w•.21 .1 . \ , oQj~ - __ _!:84.!,!7~74~.28~ / 3, ...-01,<> ~ . ~ VJ. L• 'jlP rat:811""' 410,1188.55 \ -\,beJ..??,1-f.~ D I ·=aC:..:,.»~~~~~ E Unit prices updaled: 02/12/02 Vanion: 4/ZW2 Report Dalo: e/24l2005 L ~ ~ ~ u § • • ~ ~ :; u • g ~ • ~ ~ u • C ., ~ • C Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Oliotnal bond CO!llplllallons pmpared by; Name: FillTIName: Addles,;: . Slabilizaltan/Erosion Sedfment Conlrol (ESC) EJdsling Right-of-Way lmpnwements Future PIJblic Road Improvements & Drainage Faciliti Prtvale lmprovemen1s Calculatsd Quanlity Completed Total RlghH>f Way and/er Sile Restoration Band'/" (Flrsl $7,500 ol bond" snau be cash.II Perfonnaru:a Boner Amount (A+a,.t;-tD} = TOTAL Reduced Perfonnance Bond• To!al - Maintenance/Delecl Bcrld' Total NAME OF PERSON PREPARING BONO' REDUCTION; Dalo: . ~/?'f/t,rg. Toi.ti: f~S· flfJS-• ?S"l'2 df 'IUi> a>'?> ProjedNo: L01P0016 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS & DRAINAGE FACILITIES FINANCIAL GUARANTEE REQ!JIREMENTS . (A) (B) (C) (D} PERFORW\NCE BOND' AI.IOUNT $ ,91-1i.1'0;6~fa~ $',OlA(:t.~ s\.st4-1.~.~I ~ ...-/ $ 410.688.6 bJ<c,t.(,;'\-9~ (A+B) $ .3 (T} $1::\16'~ M1nmunn bftnd" .lltllnrll'I !l _ BOND' AMOUNT REQUIRED AT RECORDING OR lEMPORARY OCCUPANCY - PUBLIC ROAD & DRAllllAGE MAINTENANC81lEf'ECT BOND" I I ~~.(..3,_._'J.d ·. ~-( f"{V\... (E} $ )~ l ,-,0') (" . ----·. ~~-~ 1-0 6 ~ ~ Tx0.30 $ ( ~~ (T.£} $ . Use _rarger of lx:iiw ,~ (.'&.(",<> Dala: (B+C} x '!'/,lfl/f,. )0. 'fv" o.2s~ s -'-------:~24~~~.2~ ...7 • NOTE: The word 1aur as used in this document means anyfinandal guarantee acceptable tD King Counly. "NOTE: KCC 27A.auth<rizD1 ri!illl cf way and one "'51Dration llonds ID be cornb<ned 1'lhen-l>o1h an, re<Jin=d. The mstoranon reqt1irernent shall include the total cost for aH T:ESC as a mlnia,um, not a maximum. In addition, correctiw 'M>rk, bolh on-and· off.site needs ID be tndudad. Quantities shall reft8Gt lWf5e case 50Elllilrfos not lust rnfrdmum requrrerue,ns. For example, if a safmonld stream· may be damaged, acmla eslfmated OJSts for teSloraticn .-.1o be reflected In lh1s amollll!. The 30% c:cnntigency and mollmalion alSIS ara computed in this quantity. -NOTE, Per KCC 27A. IZ>lal bond IU110Lllls remaining afte,reductlun shall oot be re.. lhan 30% of 1"" original amount (T) or as revised by 1112jor design chan;as. SURETY BOND RICER NOTE: U a l>ood ~de, Is used. minlnwm a<ldillooal pelformance bond shall be ! S (389.356.ll)l(C+D),E REQUIRED BOND" AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND MODIFICATION BY ODES "I:. f! o&Jeutz.. 6/zqp/fl>§" D-P,5$rD Page9af9 I04s11ll8BOW.xls . Chech outths DOES Web :site at www.metlDkc.aovlddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4mJ02 Report Oele: 6l24l2005 '-!; ~ n u § • • ; ~ ~ u • ~ ~ • ~ ~ t • " ; • ~ • e l,V,;:)l~ l,J.l'lt:J ~ CORE ~DESIGN. Pagem. /0 D Urgont D For Rslrl-CJ PJ.....,., C:omment O PhlUe Rep!y O li'lgue Rc;,:yclo CORE PESIGN, INC.14711 N.E. 29 111 Pl. Suite 101, Bellevue. WA 98007 Phone: 425 885-7871 Fax 425 885-7963 ;---, /--- '-_/ Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet @King County Department of Development & Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 Project Name: Plat of Evendell Location: SE 136th St & 157th Ave SE Clearing greater than or equal to 5,000 board feet of timber? X yes If yes, 'Forest Practice Permit Number: (RCW 76.09) Page 1 of 9 no L04GF042 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Date: Project No.: . Activity No.: 1-Dec-04 Lo I F'<Jo t6 LfJ 1 l"flfl 16A/Lfl3REfl38 L 0 4;,R 024- Note: All prices include labor, equipment, materials, overhead and profit. Prices are from RS Means data adjusted for the Seattle area or from local sources if not included in the RS Means database. c~ 7t _£._;}~r:J ? 04009BQW03 Check out the· DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 04/22/02 Report Date: 12/1/2004 -·, .... ----,,,, .,-.., ' \.....' Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet °,Sl!l{:?,•t.~'!f.>r.•·Ttt-·•Y•·~"<"W."""""""'"'''~W"..,.._h'',!Y"-""•V--s,i •.•••. ··~~ ,,.,._,'" -,::,.,;·----.·-:,c,,;·•,s,. "'"' < --..•• •. .-----.,-'g: -. -' •: -,.-.--_,,_ ... A_......, .. ,_. ... ,,~--,,.;.~--···=· -· \~f~~~~ lii·i tfi .: :;~·~'.<' ;:~~ l;~ 1~l~~-:)~ "12,, t~)1:; ~ ·; tt.'. ,/~~·'.1 ~-·lrat,±J: .. ~r~. ,:Ii;' '~~-· -i ·. ~~ii ".!.~~~ ijl i--~~::· ;1..c~,-.,· _ :i ~~.:r~ ._.;:f_•i:_ :~'.' :'f. t ~~ qf;l~ ;Jo~::;,":, _·~\'t;-,;1u~ }lfft~l~-!-~ ;itt,'. ':f11i' _. ':'.l;~~W} ·: :· '!'!~ ~~~ 0 ~,i-_1~:.. :· ~, -~--~-.· ~~-!:"-. , :;P·_-._· ' :·:~t~, : :-:~--· ~':R8fer~O~e_:.1'L .A. ~-, ~rlC_e .. h~~j '.:'¥ ·H:t'lit'.~~ · -~ ~.,_Q\Jao.tiW~~-;~. ~ :i--'1:AP.P.li¢'a.UP'!§;._.i1 :i,,,1Z~J: . .§P$f _~ .E.R'"'s· l"'"''SED"(••"E' ~iml'll>'o·· i<i:r.R-· o···L· . a', · ,, "" .,.,.,, ·.,.,,«. ,, .. ,,,. · ·" 't""~""'""" :c • -.•. , ~/h1,:rn~' I ,. :li'.: " . ..,, ... iii" , w,1; ·" · · . ., :JI"' ·.i,J•· •• :;i,c • • <t;;, • · .• , .!\,"'-"•~ r • . C,_ 0.1~., &;;:, ' IVI · l'l''lf'.'..v.i. ·-.l'I'.(, ~ -~~ ,;;--., -, _Nµ..ffib0t_ t _1;,.il._,~ '1-"'-.:_s __ -~ .::....:;~~~ ,' _·,:,;-,_/;:!·;:it-,~;)ff; ac.:,~;. r: ii} ~rl.; i ~,-:thiflE~f:s;·1W·,..,1m:1~ ii.t":ti1r,i:J!:lli::.iim, ~ Backfill & compaction-embankment ESC-1 $ 5.62 CY 15000 1 84300 Check dams, 4" minus rock ESC-2 SWDM 5.4.6.3 $ 67.51 Each 16 1 1080 Crushed surfacin£1_ 1 1/4" minus ESC<l ___ WSDOT 9-03.9(3) $ 85.45 CY Ditchin£1_ IESC-4 I I $ 8.08 I CY 275 1 2222 Excavation-bulk I ESC-5 I I $ 1.50 I CY 15000 1 22500 Fence, silt IESC-6 I SWDM 5.4.3.1 I $ 1.38 I LF 2400 3312 Fence, Temporary (NGPE) IESC-7 I I $ 1.38 I LF 1 Hydroseeding IESC-8 I SWDM 5.4.2.4 I $ 0.59 I SY Jute Mesh I ESC-9 I SWDM 5.4.2.2 I $ 1.45 I SY Mulch, by hand, straw, 3" deep IESC-10 I SWDM 5.4.2.1 I $ 2.01 I SY Mulch,bymachine,straw,2"deep IESC-11 I SWDM5.4.2.1 I$ 0.53 I SY 50000 1 26500 Piping, temporary, CPP, 6" IESC-12 I I $ 10.70 I LF Pip_ing, temporary, CPP, 8" IESC-13 I I $ 16.10 I LF 200 1 4140 Pip_ing, temporary, CPP, 12" IESC-14 I I $ 20.70 I LF Plastic covering, 6mm thick, sandbagged IESC-15 I SWDM 5.4.2.3 I $ 2.30 I SY Rip Rap_, machine placed; slopes IESC-16 I WSDOT 9-13.1(2) I $ 39.08 I CY Rock Construction Entrance, 50'x15'x1' I ESC-17 I SWDM 5.4.4.1 I $ 1,464.34 I Each 5 1 195 Rock Construction Entrance, 100'x15'x1' IESC-18 I SWDM 5.4.4.1 I $ 2,928.68 I Each 2929 Sediment p_ond riser assembly IESC-19 I SWDM 5.4.5.2 I $ 1,949.38 I Each Sediment trap, 5' high berm IESC-20 I SWDM 5.4.5.1 I $ 17.91 I LF 1 1949 Sed. trap, 5' high, riprapp~ spillway berm section IESC-21 I SWDM 5.4.5.1 I $ 68.54 I LF Seeding, by hand ESC-22 SWDM 5.4.2.4 $ 0.51 SY Soddinjl_, 1" <Jeep, level ground ESC-23 SWDM 5.4.2.5 $ 6.03 SY Sodding, 1" deep, sloped ground IESC-24 I SWDM 5.4.2.5 I $ 7.45 I SY TESC Supervisor lESC-25 $ 74.75 HR 1 10 1 748 Water truck, dust control IESC-26 SWDM 5.4.7 $ 97.75 HR I 10 1 978 ViiR1]E:fN~l:fE.MS\tt:[( S'e8tpaq'e1:9)t~~::~iiil;!i~~l~'!!,~~~ ~ t~-~~~:r::;~ &Jbt~fht:. ~; fi-~i:~'..~ ~ ,!9:~}:,:~,fi l,i,ft:.~~1~.:.~_:y1_~5t~,:~ :,. ,r:~~~Jt~:;"!:~·-k'.:~-, ~ }~f;t~r~,~~::~\~X Page 2 of 9 04009BQW03 Concrete Vault $120,000.00 Each I 1 1 120000 ESC SUBTOTAL: 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: ESCTOTAL: COLUMN: Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes $ 270,852.62 $ 81,255.79 $ 352,108.41 A Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 04/22/02 Report Date: 12/1/2004 -,,--, Site Improvement Bo(_)Quantity Worksheet •• ~d.l:'2~'!'.AAV+-~~-":'"lll!!t~~~~,,,qrs;,;;,,..,,.,,; • .:;.:::;. ;s;;..,&;_,,.Jh-~.-,. -""l\..~~%: -•-<>< ·ti--l-:' ..:zw.;: __ ; .• ,.C&J4tt4W.i.,,:;;;;;::z::;.;::~....i::m-3LJ _;.; J\ .21.;1. A ,JC,f,i~.~A!L-.:::.t ~ ,, · J.'"""";i'.1',;';;;;""~· -r,·r.;;,·• ;. :~· "li;c~;;:,· /i , .. " -p 1"' · ·;;'.,.'~ll;'Eiisiiog ·.~, ')'.r,r:li • lii,,·"F.uture,P.uliilf::,~., 'c · i,::,.·,;;:._'lt,;eil'~tei 0.: ,. •i!\iirc1·1i /''1' 'iT!iiujiot.[lF<'ompl~teif• · ,. ~ :., j,;\,:,... i'i~\1, .'t~)'fi\'.~.: .. );r°" :~it:1(~.:-411\~~ ti'1{)j .. ·~t~f-J1, t.:!:;.: !7. '$ ·)r"l;·i,·". ·.i~,R#.: ... h."~. '1'"w·P·~~-1}' i i~·.·.',.,1~·:. ~~-.. :~R· ... ;·td',·;:r! .. ~ '.~~,;; ~31',.-rn .. ~ts-Miib,1 -~' .. t;:·. ~,:,'.ill!,.· '.·lfr~.·,>-~ ~ '.,''~. ' .. :tit··.-~~ ~~~1 :.1sJ11·(!,d-,~dt~t'1an. ')1J";., '~.\. ;: .._._ , ., ,, ::.,., i, • .,,_ .•• .-.. '.ll·J, +;-,h;' ., .. ,_ •. "~-... iil! .. ·.: . .,,":i"'-::"' :.:., ~': .• "~' ·""'-~,-• •. 19 t.~.~ ~Yr;•-,,~ ,1 • , ,·•'. ,, -~-.ulJl:J!roy~m~n::~~Jjj,,' ;~ ":..,t-, t "n::tp.r,ovemelJ s~t ·,;h-"-' • ,,.. .;! ... _,., .,,....,,.,,, """""· _,-.,. .l!i..:-1.t.;; S:<~~~'\ ·.,iJJt.) :~, '3~(:'J~~r!,' _jf r-~~ 'JP'it~--~. ~1tr:.:~1~;11 ·~~ ~:i~f1~ 1~~~~~itt..i~;~~i~!~l,.~~iij1\s!,r>r~tiia'gt;;F.icilit(l~1 ~-~~ ~· -r:~?~!?: .. J&~:1 ~1t_ ~~· -·_-~1-}:tt n;:,<:~·ar~~ 5't"~1,~tz··~·;t;! r~&~'~; <''11'~· ,,,n ,,;,:,,.;f;;:.t~' "'1,. , ,;m;.!i'!iii; ,~. :'!',~'' ::,; · ·: \hi 'W , ,-, .,!;fl', .11i 'l' ,. ',, ,,,;;y;c-,. ; .,,1,· ,<'!ls ,~,J· :l,'f-;t>F·'. ,t:.'l>i•'~"." , ,. ..:!ll'.,;\elllliWI~ -,~ ,.~?!f . 'l"l''' IJ!li· ,:1\,,,,,. l''i'.iil!;-,l,ll!';t!J. ~,, ,., (~,!~·~· ... :~~t;;.IJ,'ftiri,,Jf'.1'":-{1.,w.f:J::krullMi'!!~J!!'1i h'l.Jmttence;~: . JJrut:~ '"J)U<Jht!..,:-1'\ .b'.!f:~~Goi;:t:":'"c J·\!!lfl Ooanti:~1·1,:. ~ '1,_'fl~Gost~,:9r.-Jl.-1': :;r.;eu~rif!f£r~:c•;~t4.qost 'Ji·-~1:~:tGPJ11Plete ;_~~-" _2~ost-~:~:'. .~ '(iBIERAt1TEMSr :. :~i''1~,\:.ilf'1@1ifiN~t1~::]S?:f~~.:1t~)~ · -:5.~I:f~"" ~(i· .:~ (~~:rf:~i~J. ~; ;,;i;r-· ~ _ii,~~~~~!~Yr~· ~:,arc4:~~~1:~r;~:::r~::;.., ·;i~: ... ~4i.'!,~i·t~-'.~t -~~:.~:r~~:~:1. _,Backfill&Compaction-embankment lGl-11$_ 5.62J CY J J, ~ .l ·~ 20001, 11,240,QOL 1§0~-·-84,300.00J I · .,Backfill & Coml',action-trench I GI-2j L 8.53 I CY I 3561 ~.985.50J _ 600J_ -~ 5,118.00I 10501 ____ . .fl,956.50 Clear/Remove Brush, by hand GI -3 ClearinQ/GrubbingfTree Removal Gl-4 Excavation,· bulk GI-5 Excavation -Trench Gl-6 Fericing, cedar, 6' high GI -7 Fencing, chain link, vinyl coated, 6' high GI -8 Fencing, chain link, gate, vinyl coated, 2 GI -9 1Fencing, split rail, 3' high . GI -10 Fill & compact • common barrow GI, 11 Fill & compact. gravel base GI -12 Fill & compact. screened topsoil GI -13 Gabion, 12n deep, stone filled mesh GI -14 Gabion, 18" deeo, stone filled mesh GI, 15 Gabion, 35n deeo, stone filled mesh GI -16 Grading, fine, by hand GI -17 Grading, fine, with grader GI -18 Monuments, 3' long GI -19 Sensitive Areas Sign GI ·20 Sodding, 1" deep, sloped ground GI· 21 Surveying, line & grade GI· 22 Surveying, lot location/lines GI -23 T raffle control crew ( 2 flaggers ) GI -24 Trail, 4" chipped wood GI -25 Trail, 4" crushed cinder GI -26 Trail, 4" top course Gl-27 Wall, retaining, concrete GI -28 Wall, rockery GI -29 Page 3 of9 ~Kee 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. 04009BQW03 $ 0.36 $ 8,876.16 $ 1.50 $ 4.06 $ 18.55 $ 13.44 $ 1,271.81 $ 12.12 $ 22.57 $ 25.48 $ 37.85 $ 54.31 $ 74.85 $ 132.48 $ 2.02 $ 0.95 $ 135.13 $ 2.88 $ 7.46 $ 788.26 $ 1,556.64 $ 85.18 $ 7.59 $ 8.33 $ 8.19 $ 44.16 $ 9.49 SUBTOTAL SY I, Acre 2 CY CY 400 LF LF Each LF CY CY CY SY SY SY SY SY Each 5 Each SY Dav Acre HR SY SY SY / SF SF 2,500le, 1125 17,752.32 1,624.00 675.65 788.26 110,400.00 10,676.25 144,901.98 : 17,752.32 5750,. 8,625.00 650 2,639.00 12 1,621.56 2 1,576.52 ,...,.e~4" ~"'-\ 48,572.40 Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 9 1156 -· 't.::::rt: 79,885.44\ , ,. 4,669.00 788.26 r ~ 178,599.20 Unit prices updated, 02112/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 12/1/2004 ~· Site Improvement Bor:.Jouantity Worksheet •::t~};,;5_,~i~J,~f,)~(-.:·· '.]tl :,jtn1:,.: ! J;; :f~JJ-: .. .r6~j ~;~,k_C-,_ ; l;/ ,-~ •~(hlli'.l.ijt~\!J!?Jl-.ii~(:· A~l t .,:tf' ~~-.~~-t~t!t~.b·Q~.t~-~r."; f:( l~f~-·ffiyiJt_') .~~~1";::::~:1~,'. \1¢q~:~j!1<1:'!~~9'.~l~~tp~l~.] ~~?{::'.'1~v•/._ \}~F,.\;'"\~·l·~~ .. ··<·\.'"' 1-,.1 r ~ {'." ·;i~ ·i, ~}!~ ;~·~·-~1 .. :;,, ~,Ri~lif-O~c,J:Y ~.?:~;: '-'~: (,,,' -~~-R~fd;!P1~f~'-'.e'tite~l§~ ~--·11.:;. ;hi;} -1!TieJ'>Y~tb;~!~·:::~r2 ~il '-~';!: ~-.!lt,~~-~_:j~~~--:~:::_''??~ :·:.l] i;r~~.i.· :citfi 'A:i_!iJ;F~~;'; ±"ti,:,_~::t '.~ ~'"': t.'.'' ~£ . -'t~ t 'ih,!\if ~~!iL:~tf'li ,1r.' ,_q\"i_l;;'.--· ~~i.:.:.,_ ,I! kn:&·ioia1Daoe;F..acllitle'S,_ }j;. -'~ If£: \tit. ~.,f~-'· ~r~~4if?.: ~ :t~ f,,cliuaifit;W,;ti!~,1!11~::,';!A, ~: •. -i~~ :~I ~:~~-~,,,~~\<J'!':':?'.il.:::~.t;J:.:::1-_}:-_.:_. ~{j_rlit'fricei:;s .,,:_l)riit2 ~!Qbari~-,j~;t; [:,:-CO'S(, ."'::-~i.-·.:·o'v~nttt_ :_~:_,.:.· ·:cosr;~~:.:L :.1,o·uani.:~:,~-~.::-~cp~;, ::}..:~: .C6~p1efgl~ .,£fi;YS:G~stl_:._ ~ BO~.li>1iMP.RO~MEiilm~.;,:;~',j;{:!~No.J~i;: . , ::, .. ~;~,,;c:;~liit.4~ilfr,il;Ji,,3~~i; _;,~,. · .,:, :::~:··.; ~~_.,,.,,.,.._.·.~·~'tf!i'~-~ .... ;~:· .·~ .;:·,··\1~-·-·'. ~~Js,ti;{~ u:<ffcAti. -~l -··.<if. "".1'"'1-1;.f:•,· .,t:ij'f.:7_ --.::; ,..,.,.c'.1c<'"""'' Jit,!:'Ht-... 10ak;;~/.,, ":>\Li'1i" ~ilc.-1-1t/i"<:.., ..... 1~~-:.:.!._"",L~, '·J.1.1. ,;~,: : .. ~~&.-~! AC Grindin_!h 4' wide machine < 1 OOOsy I RI -1 I $ 23.00 I SY IAC Grinding, 4' wide machine 1000-200 RI -2 AC Grinding, 4' wide machine > 2000sy RI -3 AC Removal/Disposal/Repair Rl-4 Barricade, type I RI -5 Barricade, type Ill ( Permanent ) Rl-6 Curb & Gutter, rolled RI -7 IGurb & Gutter, vertical RI -8 Curb and Gutter, demolition and disposa Rl-9 Curb, extruded asphalt RI -10 Curb, extruded concrete RI -11 Sawcut, asphalt, 3• depth Rl-12 Sawcut, concrete, per 1" depth RI -13 Sealant. asphalt RI -14 Shoulder, AC, ( see AC road unit price) Rl-15 Shoulder, gravel, 4" thick Rl-16 SideWaik, 4" thick Rl-17 Sidewalk, 4" thick, demolition and dispos RI -18 1Sidewalk, 5" thick RI -19 Sidewalk, 5" thick, demolition and dispos RI -20 Sign, handicap RI -21 Striping, per stall RI -22 Striping, thermoplastic, ( for crosswalk ) RI -23 Striping, 4" reflectortzed line RI -24 Page 4 of 9 ~Kee 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 04009BQW03 $ 5.75 $ 1.38 $ 41.14· $ 30.03 $ 45.05 $ 13.27 $ 9.69 $ 13.58 $ 2.44 $ 2.56 $ 1.85 $ 1.69 $ 0.99 $ - $ 7.53 $ 30.52 $ 27.73 $ 34.94 $ 34.65 $ 85.28 $ 5.82 $ 2.38 $ 0.25 SUBTOTAL SY SY SY LF LF LF 3300 43,791.00 LF 2500 24,225.00 LF LF LF LF LF LF SY SY SY 1100 33,572.00 925 28,231.00 SY SY l-> l<"'':.S,oEW.t\Llt -1:,/..) ~ ,,, .<1.~ .!!. SY Each Each SF 120 285.601 6"'6 Ti'f LF 5600 1,400.00 59,482.60 72,022.00 Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.qovlddes ~. >'\~ -. ,50 D nt&J) ""111'."1 -, 119.00 Unit prices updated; 02/12/02 Ver.sion: 4/22/02 Report Date: 12/1/2004 --,1'>1,t<"l '!101> ,, 5i _ ~ 9,Q? .9<, i!l''V,tbS/ ,._,,.., -l C/ .:g > QO£_ oof,. l y~~-; -' ~"'/1 -,, fr -;::__~_11!' ___ -__ 09_.£:J:=_~ ,._{ ~-. 52.. '2 I ~ "/1 h ~£ ~ ~ ,-.. ,-\ Site Improvement Bors._,)Quantity Worksheet .1: ~::.:;, ' ""·ff··" ·,-,,·p'J\Lli~·;-!,'\ mi;,· ··~""'K'.',l.l .,.,... '• ,, """"'f ·~.1"'11:ll.-.. ~·>ccch' •. ,:ii•,:--,w~·,e"-,,., T...,,,,r-~.---" .----.,. ··--,._.g··-r..•>tJ.l:-Ii,'" ';d:l'.'"i.""'!'.'' ,;:"';r.;···,,,':::_(.i~ -t,$mv.11c1pMM.l' i9. .. ;,' •'"P,:B •• d"R'· d-·~··1 .. " ~ .. ,. '~ .... -~ h·y.;s, '··--f"t,V•·';'. \-,. ; !F":.f'11~' ?J:;i~ t.::ri.·~, It 1,Exlstmgr'!t" .. "-,s,; 4; °!1 ~ k??,f'UtUreJ~Ub IC1?1.1,.~,; t;. f~r..,"'• 4-:::J ,,\."1f.'r1Yi:ll8t"'·, ":,;i_, .. 'l.('''I;; ,~p . "'~ Ort · ·.1,_e UC IOO~~J' ,1:.1 1.-.:lf ~-i~;f.: ''/\ •c · -t. -~-:;,: '. ~ ~\ ;'._'':· l, '.!ir:,:i11,(Rf ·''·~·:.,, .:.,1!1,f\g!j~ --~ f ;.,~.~ :if diJ· .,d ~ .'i ·:_.f~:-/ ;f>_:)".'":/j .;.it~-,;.%•'~'--·?~·-~ ~;·· , ,:;,,;,)'., r)>,.\i.~.-:~~~--~'•1f ---~--~ -' f "·:ii.'.1)1;, ::·'· ·:~ 1r.-:;.:_,;9'i.t,lf -;i'\. • '.·?111:J·"' i~r. -. j-~ -~Ji.' !4Wi~~~1ui:0.Jf~~,l;."; ~.. .' ,; -~~l?,~y:],f ... ~~~~!ijfq_n~, ~~,~~nl I'!!?l·P·· Yii~e~,. ~~ ~1". It~!!~·~\!·~~,..~:·~\~;-" =:L . :. ,,.'~·' ·:..~·\.-.: ; _·_:ij,, ··:·ti':~· :r~·\~, ,,.. ·''. ;~ . .:!i:~ ~1:iJ;J-4, }i."'.1 :::J1t : !;f & ~rainage Facll1t~s I -;,,;.,.Wi.:· ,~k'.~~:_.? ~ :rt~!t r.,-•;i&;.'-:~ "_:::.._. 'f:.©ua:n;.;j,tt,:lr: ~-J!_ ~-!\1i, ~-·.-;r -•--... '• ~·•"m,t·~-, ••. ,,,._., •l< _-I»' ,..,~,,;;"'lftC,,OV-.,,>"~·-~·=·• ,·u, . ·• "' -,·-• .~ • , . -., ,.,_, __ ,,., •, A, ,~:,,_ ..• ,-.-,.,,,:<ls> . .:<o•C,,O••>"-·"·"·~~-'""''I~~<-"-• ,,,l'IL'ij;,j, ..C,,,_, ' '· • •. · ·-~: ~~r .. ;~d-~)f.Dhit;~ri~1Il~:H~f~fb~t~auant:i"l11m~€crau~:.R.·.£i~l~bii!Ot~ .. ri©tk~~{q;psf ~1!.·,.:.~:. -J\IIG)u~friff.tl•-~-iiGof;lt'.-~~~~iitt)'.~o"inpt8ie·l~.i-~-:~~t.'~~ .. :." ·R-0~m'ils"RrAr-c::1;..·1·N"G'C'li. 'hh·.·; 1 "'1Ai'"'~;:, k ... ';l.;.;.. '"';·';),""'. 1':J7A-; .. ·, ""'""' ''.triljf".~""'''~\"ij~. ~IW'l"'fn•· ·_-··-·"'!1.lll"i' ~.:::.~:~~-.,:::.:~t!J!'""ii1"P.·. -. #f ;.,.".· .. i:;'f"'··.~~.-,sq -:-:~ .. ~~·,,ijij{i;.,. '"·V'. :!\J.l!i~.. -ii).,;:< ~~~,Jj"l\.· ,~-'4'.'~;·J.c.14.V' .If}. ··.;;;;:,·•_"·'!lll~·+'+i:•~N~,£fffi1'1i!f ;:RI,'> .•. i • 1·u:.1~.:tu G ~ :?'~,':!,~Qc~t:= ?.5.b?~-~ &i.1'f~'\~cm_co_~§f?)!:;ifi'o~·J~~-KCRS!((~.t-<o¢k:z. ~ ~~§e &·~.!~" top,.c9µrs.§L.:..<.::c~' ·; ·..£_t ~·~-·~~ -~..:etJ".1 ·:to. 111.: _: &r ~~-Ll~'. ~-~:;,;..,j,_f;'.'liL.£ ... ,.,. For KCRS '93, (additional 2.5" base) addl RS -1 j $ . 3.60 j SY j 3500! ~~ 12,600.0Q[ 277_QL__ 9,972.ooj 1450j 5,220.ooj j AC Overtay, 1.5" AC I RS -2 I $ 7 .39 I SY AC Overlay, 2" AC I RS -31 $ 8.75 I SY AC Road, 2" ~ 4" rock, First 2500 SY RS-4 $ 17.24 SY AC Road, 2", _!" ro~~ Qty. over 2500SY I RS -5 $ 13.36 SY AC Road! 3H,_!8_r(?ck, First 2500 SY RS-6 $ 19.69 SY -!AC Road, 3", 4" rock, Qty. over 2500 SYI RS -7 $ 15.81 SY AC Road, 5", First 2500 SY I RS -8 $ 14.57 SY AC Road, 5", Qt,c Over 2500 SY I RS -9 $ 13.94 SY AC Road, 6", First 2500 SY IRS -11 $ 16.76 SY AC Road, 6", Qty. Over 2500 SY IRS-111 $ ·16.12 SY As.e_halt Treated Base, 4" thick ~s -1 $ 9.21 SY Gravel Road, 4" rogk, First 2500 SY IRs -1 $ 11.41 SY Gravel Road, 4" ro~!...()ty. over 2500 SYIRS -1 $ 7.53 SY PCC Road, 5", no bas~ over 2500 SY jRs-11 $ 21.51 SY PCC Road, 6", no base, over 2500 SY jRS-11 $ ·21.87 SY Thickened Edjl_e __ ______BS -1 $ 6.89 LF Page 5 of9 SUBTOTAL /JO 2500 270 2500 49,225.00 1000 15,810.00 I flT e'- 77,635.00 ~ A!T-g,_ <, <.. ,-l j) 1...) lo F-(l-d 24,998.00 f',., 43,100.00 1450 3,607.20 A T" 6 IJ. (,, /!.), t " < " .-..1 }. ,\C /J J_ ,U.... 640 4,409.60 56,679.20 34,627.60 *KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. 04009BQW03 Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 12/1/2004 ~ ,,,-.., Site Improvement BoOOuantity Worksheet • "<~ -. "L d,:-~:~erir ·iil~t ,{,'.:h . ..,•··~ "~ .. (r ~;~?-: .":; .. Q'.' -,:f f :l-: ,,;:i;:-. ·Jii:i. : ii;~f.~li,:i; f~~:'"';~! "~iSfft1Qi': ,l ~ ~:~~J(.-r.,~~~:· ... ~~-:i:;.· .UfUr'fij~~bilt.1~.'.~i'.~!: ~ 1'·;,c:t~~p. -f.iV~J{."'.·' ·:li%_".,~ i:.~ · ~B. J;r(d!~i¥0U~S)it.)'.; j~ [r'i:,., -~,,ni."'"d l•~.•.,,L,_,h,;,,•,,.,1~~!:•<>:t;-.{.'•,t, ,,,.,.,? ,;;~:!'.'~-";>• ,e;~· .... ~.:.,-~\_,;j,,-,:'::,f,,,,!h ,l),' ,·,:~.'•tlf\;,'.'*'i'.'t.•",~'>'.;< •,~-~'-'•r?.,,•:r \,,t ~.:::.:•1,.,,,,.-~,.:r~·-.... ·,_ -:-.· .. · -· . ·-· ~r •. .ro-f1'.,' . .if, ;i-.d,:.--~ ~-• i: ., · "'~i. ·.-,.--.... ,'.:!:ie;n, .fi'-1Rl·g· ht-of~ay _··ID~ :-~-t.~, ,_ -l,Road JinproYerrients,+ ., : r.. -; '_"} lm.Provemen.·tst~,';' t· ·L:1_~: i, 'iJ>· • ::;:i; ·.~. :J., i • s. • J • "" ', -·. --. ;·· .,..,., ·,w./~JW,ri ,-" '"'/'-w",.,·~ · • ,,.,.1, \··~·1; -~-~.-•;-, .. ,,:;,,:.,'····>(]. f., •. ,, .• ~....,,,$:.~;'7':·,·1 '1:v··· ,~~---·--· ----··-··•· •· L.' . '/f 1.~~: - 1 : ,,; :· ".!!.~ ~~··-'----~ }~; -~? ·2,_~ ~~,:~,-. ~~;·_ ·1:ii ·;;,~~t;} ~/~:1i_~ :!,t~-~-:~~::· t~-\ ~:~ =~W·.~-~· -&f~~~(ita~e:Ea.cmt~s ·:.. ~~ ~ ~\-~.:-'<~~ 1':~(:~~~:~f:~r-r~A.lJ~'ii!·~:li'.{ .. 1;r:• "ci_~,i~,~ ~1S .. :.c. -~ ---._ f{:__'\ ... k .~· P,"1/ ~--• .. :;, .. "I.ct-;;:,-._',·,; ~Unif P.rtce:l": ',!lt)_flit 0 • ~Qyilpt:tL ~,:;_.-~:,:CQ~J';;ii: ~: ":'< t~c1nt_')1.:-.: _: trt .. 1.G0St~,,_ :!it~ jigauaor 11,:%.~l!t'"Cosi::; ~-. ;._.,;::· -~OJJiple[;h~~:.QoStr ~[ . E>RA1NiAGE!.r.{~p·.~t1Vr~~t:d-0 ·1~StiaiPi't?:fl1:?.hf Eq-w·va·1e~t,-·.::·:d~~·~iF="-~,;;-~;~~,;cr,l~-:frt?f;;m:t!t';rn ~:_r.;r~ ..... £.;-P·1"~)X--:1ii,ii'!';!'Jif;:.:;imt1ffMrli.;;~;f~_:":':·~;;?»··,;;£~:J~:c~}'-·: _\;;r--:--""T.. :,l"'O~i:~~:rg{_~'~_:r;, ·~~f;_&:~'f~ ~~. . __ _.__ r.i. :,,'.:.I ;::!,WM:'-~-~.v::t"::_, __ .!it :r:. • ,. -~<!M. ;1_~~-, _. ~ ,, ~c,.,..~ . ,.;i;,,,,. ... _ .r.Or; UNij .. -.PQQBS, gv_erage; o ·~_,;:over,Wi;!s_ais§Jlme:Ql\~ ... .u-pe,~.;ira '"'-'If""· _ .tS\Same-.pnc~<.as s0Js.t!p1peru ~--. · ?!!!Ck .14.:.: $JI Access Road, RID I D -1 f $ 16.74 I SY Bollards -fixed I o -2 I $ 240.74 I Each Bollards -removable o -3 I $ 452.34 I Each 2 481.481 I I 2 2 452.34 • (CBs include frame and lid) --·----------- CB Type I D-4 $ 1.257.64 Each 12 15.091.68 22 27.668.08 11 CB Type IL D-5 $ 1,433.59 Each ,, I. CB Type II, 48" diameter D -6 $ 2.033.57 Each 8 16,268.56 ! -18.302.13 31 for additional depth over 4' D-7 $ 436.52 FT 29 12.659.08 9 3,928.68 17] CB Type JJ, 54" diameter D-8 $ 2,192.54 Each for additional depth over 4' D-9 $ 486.53 FT CB Type ll, 60H diameter D-10 $ 2.351.52 Each 1 2,351.52 for additional depth over 4' D -11 $ 536.54 FT 536.5' CB Type II, 72" diameter D-12 $ 3.212.64 Each for additional depth over 4' D-13 $ 692.21 FT , Through-curb Inlet Framework (Add) D-14 $ 366.09 Each 3 1.098.27 C!eanout, PVC, 4" D-15 $ 130.55 Each I c1e·anout, PVC, 6" D-16 $ 174.90 Each 531 Cleanout, PVC, 8" D -17 $ 224.19 Each Culvert, PVC, 4" D-18 $ 8.64 LF ------Culvert, PVC, 6" D-19 $ 12.60 LF Culvert, PVC, 8" D -20 $ 13.33 LF Culvert, PVC, 12" D-21 $ 21.77 LF 1Culvert, CMP, 8" D -22 $ 17.25 LF Culvert, CMP, 12" D-23 $ 26.45 LF Culvert, CMP, 15" D -24 $ 32.73 LF Culvert, CMP, 18n D -25 $ 37.74 LF Culvert, CMP, 24" D -26 $ 53.33 LF Culvert, CMP, 30" D-27 $ 71.45 LF Culvert, CMP, 36" D-28 $ 112.11 LF Culvert. CMP. 48" D -29 $ 140.83 LF Culvert, CMP, 60" D-30 $ 235.45 LF Culvert, CMP, 72" D-31 $ 302.58 LF Page 6 of 9 SUBTOTAL 46,587.95 52,250.41 *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 04009BQW03 Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 481.48 904.68 13,834.04 6.100.71 7,420.84 I, 2,351.52 9,269.70 40.362.97 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 12/1/2004 r' Site Improvement Bor::)auantity Worksheet ~. 11ii~i~i~ii~~~~;i: ~.:i~~i· ~i;;i~p:~ ~~~~~~ ~--r~f.~~,~~f.-~,,,\t~ ~J:~f:~~Ii§~lfi~~{f( ;!·:t./~;·,[~~~~t~t";},i ii~:.!3J~~IJ~~~~!~aa~-j . :fi~::!.~:_rq, )1c_.!..:;":t~::,: -~::Ji-~~~ .. , -~ ·:, >« ~ ~ ,.,, ~~:-!::~~bti-Of~w:!i~j ;_ -~'~;:~,?ag,1m~~~l~~tnts~ ',,!,· , •. :ll>i ''. II11pr9~VleP~r""' ~1;i.~,~ ,:_; .. c, 1-.~~-i-'!2'b:. ~·a~~,t_,...! DRA1NA1GE•C0'N:.llN1lJED,-·ait"' ~:(' ,~ -·_ , . .:!.. \ • :: !i:5::"r .{;{.", -t~~ .. · _.:...-~,t~~~'l-~ : t/&•~fain)~Fa'cill~~:1~ _J:_~!' *.~ .. /"" . ._~.._ -°!:to~<'.i;.~ .':..~ ,a-!Jan(~ :~:.1~~ .-~""<f'I·• ~~~ ~ &:'~tlfa:l~~tr~<hfuf'. ~4.!rA'.f ~ ' ",. NO.~-'..tfriiff::,rl~;,::. M Unit,, !Quant.,_ , ~$A Costf,~1.il."'~. ~ Quaf1t. ·: ..... d .. -tlcOStb; ~c: ~e;iturnr.., 1i::i"tP'~ :._ ccist~e:·:r' _f ~mPiete :lci2:.~m':.Gost~~ 11~ Culvert, Concrete!~_ .. _ D-32 $ .21.02 LF Culvert, Concrete, 12" ID -331 $ 30.05 I LF Culvert, Concrete, 15• D-34 $ 37.34 LF Culvert, Concrete, 18" D-35 $ 44.51 LF Culvert, Concrete, 24" D-36 $ 61.07 LF Culvert, Concrete, 30" D-37 $ 104.18 LF Culvert, Concrete, 36" D -38 $ 137.63 LF Culvert, Concrete, 42" D -39 $ 158.42 LF Culvert, Concrete,_48N D -40 $ 175.94 LF Culvert, CPP, 6" D -41 $ 10.70 LF Culvert, CPP, 8" D -42 $ 16.10 LF Culvert, CPP, 12" D -43 $ 20.70 LF Culvert, CPP. 15" D -44 $ 23.00 LF Culvert, CPP, 18" D-45 $ 27.60 LF Culvert, CPP, 24" D-46 $ 36.80 LF I Culvert, CPP, 30" D-47 $ 48.30 LF Culvert, CPP, 36" D-48 $ Ditching D -49 $ 55.20 8.08 ~~ I Flow· Dispersal Trench (1,436 base+) D -50 French Drain (3' depth) D-51 Geotextile, laid in trench, polvoropylene D-52 -,Infiltration pond testing D-53 Mid-tank Access Riser, 48" dia, 6' deep D-54 Pond Overflow Spillway · D -55 Restrictor/Oil Separator, 12" D-56 Restrictor/Oil Separator, 15" D-57 Restrictor/Oil Seoarator, 18" D-58 Riprap, placed D-59 Tank End Reducer (36" diameter) D -60 Trash Rack, 12" D -61 Trash Rack, 15" D -62 Trash Rack, 18" D-63 Trash Rack, 21" D-64 Page 7 of9 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 25.99 22.60 2.40 74.75 1,605.40 14.01 1,045.19 1,095.56 1,146.16 39.08 1,000.50 211.97 237.27 268.89 306.84 SUBTOTAL LF LF SY HR Each SY Each Each Each CY Each Each Each Each Each 2700 -518 10722.6 2181 45146.7 935 50 1150 73 1679 165 589 21675.2 ,_ 50 404 .$2) 50 I It#, , I S <, 8, $ 'ii:::"--'-1 33951.8 46825.7 *KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. 04009BQW03 Check out the DDE!}i Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 28890 19354.5 4554 700.5 1146.16 268.89 54914.05 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 12/1/2004 ,,--. Site Improvement Bor0Quantity Worksheet m·· -. -~~; •, -,r.::1r 1(----c:-..,-kJ!F'.l!_'J["'-~"":~~--------,;-,.---, ""'-,_if."-..,..,_ "' ,-~~--~ , .-,, a ,. ~ ,----=-.i:: -..c·· ~-"'-' ,..... ,---.~ -....,,_ ""-.,. .,, • i:~"" ~ ~, ~ -~~~ .,.,..,, I"''' ·n• == ~ ~ " ~= •"" ~* '*A ~ ~it-1~ .J>kN'.;...·r-'.i· 'j_;,11 ~.-·::'1iC'"~. ;• ~~----··t"J.1_'"--1-: ., 1~;f., i~\ll .. :< :.r_ ~ ,;;i:,,:.. ~i1,.Ex.·istin9 '~; ~ :-5: ~·tit' ,·a\,' ruture Bublic ~ "'Ji; 1 ,--~' ~ .. ":. ~l!!B,rivat~ ~:=: ~"';; ~ l$1 .• ,t Bond ReChJ~tloln -~ :.::. ':/'. • . i.J rt·:-4(,,.,_ --:ii'.;'_~:'" ,,:, 'h' :·f.; ··::: ·, r., ··•i. -t· :11;: -if~ J". ~-;·,Et-. · __ i?· ~"" ;,r:. ,.! ~ :1 41'." 4., '!!." -,"'.~e.,'f'.;",,n.J.;; t ~ .,,..,., .. .-.. i1" ~~ .. .1.';:•11:m 'iii;· t · ,fh-ffll·?~!!' 1~w..~ "Wlo/•-tf'' ;:...·!--.. _·,, ,':.!.;:_; : .. ~.]{i·)! ... -'J11h!:flrt.:i.l-.0.:f: -~~(U?.~.,."'.'''l ,.:,.,.~-_,. 1 (11t":\t:. ,i•'1';;~, ·:1..R,1gh!rOf~~y~. · -t'l t Mr Rqad lmp~ovement~. ~ .. ;.~ · .,·-,· · lrriprove"?en.t! , -.' ~, ,,_;. f'{· .-,., 1/j ~ _r ..... <4a, ;,.,,:_u!?....,-~~···l' t.~,--,_-.''.P ... r":-~ iPl\-·· ,.r1 .•,. '»:e.m; -,.f· ····~ ,., 4 i;.tl -... .i,. r,i.., ii¥; J ~ ,,..,~,q'i.cM,~~..:.,,.••;,'i ), ~sf '.1/!J '<1'",""' •H '.'9111!>"'.'i'"""''f\JI.'!. w--,,1,,,Jl ;i1;W~3-ktzi.filllif ·. :~1.'7::..Jta ;,1,i,&.F;,At!°1Ur:;:'.11kl, \:$' .. ,;> ~~· ~,,: .,. · ,.:. • ·" ' ! ~-& Draina e Facilities·.._._·'' 1. • 1.,t: ..'1":J'.-:i' •. )\ "-~ !i : .r .;:_Ll '@t~uants:' 1/\, 1µ • ~ Ml..,, ;~::.zi" s ":1i"~~"""""" ~;;t ·· · .. :~, ", · · · · ~,-·1:r·rP. ·-f· · '!!J T e • :r 'cl" · 1 • • , • -· c· 1 • • ,_,. J ;;r0:m-i'. , .. "~ 'C<ist'.:.fl!; ·"1 ~-i/>1 At' .f ... ~· L--'.,-,i: .:'1! ,,1;>e ... .,.R .. , .w~"'~.iL," .-£~~:. .. ~-,i..:tt2JkS.T""-'·,_ 01.~rn:e;.2.,._~,-m-._ ~nee,_ · uan._ '"" _ os ·:::...'...-: .,_, an ... .;+-t,.,..:,, :t::-:-.,~mpee~"'l::'a~,;;,OSI.r.6'' ·e-A---,-;~R--,-;.K···~:·1'N',-c-~t,'.1\o" "I"" rs·· •fi'RE·A··c· ·1·N· -~V;:;,~j.')!~ -,.f•;>; •5t:·1;t1:i;:m;·''\~1~1m.~ ~-~;::;;,.;;~i¥rimJ;.\);~· ~:I·1f:~i,ilii.!1)!,~~ir::ri 11tl.j~.,.~-:1~~~~·,~:;;~·-,:~~\~"'~ ~ ,;s,m~-;i:,'£,',),f-i;;,,'ti:'~)~i--.:-~ .. r-~·:;;;::.~lifil·1;:-,-r,}i:~-~ •• .fi,l~'~.::&'' :'.L,1~;;if~~r,, '!r· ~ U.L . _ IJ r:;; 1\:11 _,_. -~..-,,.---''-~--·""·, ... ...m .•• • "'-··"'--~-._...,.-,._. __ ,,., -"" .. ,,.!iliJ'.i~_,~-v,,.,_i,£:J;"' -~'i,i'.!'.,ifi .. m!l.;,,...__ •. ....J'·tlf,,....CW ..... 1li~1·-... ~.~--"'"'l!:fl,·"'"'...,·= ""' lol!1il~-.,___,om.•.~·-''"'··*'" No. 2" AC, 2" top course rock & 4" borrow Pl -1 $ 15.84 SY 2" AC, 1.5" top course & 2.5" base cour Pl -2 $ 17.24 SY 4" select borrow Pl-3 $ 4.55 SY 1.5" to_e course rock & 2.5" base course PL-4 $ 11.41 SY I I I I .... ~ .. ··--·--.. "i--~. -. -r -: . '" ~-''•"" ~-')-~ ,i:. J.l's "'-"'''"lo-""' ; .... '.tij\"r~*S'<;\;1/l..!>l'f'"'-'ic-:.-,· <r . ' " •. ---, t.'" ' "''""····--y--1;;-,,-,, !' i-'"' ... ,,, ..... _'i_, ,r~ ~·~~_'74;,,r· v-~~-:p-,;,•,.... ·•:.iffi'' ~v,' ~ .. ;fl -. ,, .. ~~--~rr., •·'~re-·.,~---~ . '%'.· ''lll1i RITE~lw ~ITEMS~~~i'.\~:\1,i,.; i~ "-·.i'., '.;_;:,; J:n~ .. ·_,;,:J:l«~;t\:-1--'...1i. .;;%;.-~!/>'l,/~rif.1;.l.~,,,.-,, i~·· ... ;;;.:'. 'z., 1."" .11!-· ? _ /£,'.:.i./: .......... ~\t · .. -__ .;$o O :~~i; .. "t:--;i_:,:, -~ : .-;;; _ ~"-• 'J;: .'t)t::::../~ ~$ ::.~: ~1ti;L .. i....:~~.:,'?,_,;_!~5.·~~::~ .. -li: .- (Such as __ de:!enti9n~ater quality vaults.) No~ School Walkway Concrete Sidewalk Gradin}l Concrete Stairs Metal Handrail 1-----1" uV.J ~1~!&' WI -1 Wl-2 Wl-3 Wl-4 Wl-5 Wl-6 Wl-7 Wl-8 Wl-9 Wl-10 Each $ 30.52 SY J $ 5,000.00 LS $ 5,000.00 LS $ 50.00 FT · SUBTOTAL l'J ~ ,{o SUBTOTAL (SUM ALL PAGES): 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: GRANDTOTAL: COLUMN: Page 8 of 9 140 4272.B 500 15,260.00 5,000.00 4,272.80 20,260.00 366,832.13 296,609.71 t 10,049.64 88,982.91 476,881.77 385,592.62 B C ·KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. 04009BQW03 Check out the DDES Web site at. www.metrokc.gov/ddes 50 60 1,526.00 5,000.00 3,000.00 9,526.00 318,148.82 95,444.65 413,593.47 D E Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4122102 Report Date: 12/112004 Jos ( s;,11Y1-::> J.x:? n-:i?PJfJ ) oe-e * . ~,> ~ ~ rr"' ,> ) h <J -e .,,. t, "7 t' -I- ere:;, ft i--r., },t?S . . . - Original bond computations prepared by: Name: PE Registration Number: Firm Name: Address: .. .-.., '--' Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Plat of Evendell Date: 1 O-Nov-04 33713 Tel. #: 425-885-7877 Core Desi_g_n, Inc. Lo L/3_00 ti 14711 NE 29th Place, Suite #101 Project No: ROAD IMPROVEMENTS & DRAINAGE FACILITIES FINANCIAL GUARANTEE REQUIREMENTS PERFORMANCE BOND' AMOUNT BOND' AMOUNT REQUIRED AT RECORDING OR TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY••• PUBLIC ROAD & DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE/DEFECT BOND' Stabilization/Erqsion Sediment Control (ESC) Exislmg Right-of-Way Improvements Future.Public Road Improvements & Drainage Facilities Private Improvements (A) $ (B) $ (C) $ 352,108.4 476,881.8 385,592.6 R~ fociPr=~ ~C?;r- 7 ,2-;~0'f Calculated Quantity Completed Total Right-of Way and/or Site Restoration Bond'/ .. (First $7,500 of bond• shall be cash.) Performance Bond' Amount (A+B+C+D) = TOTAL Reduced Performance Bond* Total*** Maintenance/Defect Bond* Total NAME OF PERSON PREPARING BOND' REDUCTION: (D) $ 413,593.5 (A+B) $ 828,990.2 (T) $ 1,628,176.3 Minimum bond .. amount 1s $1000. (E) $ T x 0.30 $ 488,452.9 (T-E) $ 1,628,176.3 Use larger of Tx30% or (T-E) '* NOTE: The word "bond" as used in this document means any financial guarantee acceptable to King County. *'" NOTE: KCC 27A authorizes right of way and site restoration bonds to be combined when both are required. OR (B+C) x 0.25 = $ 215,618.6 Date: The restoration requirement shall include the total cost for all TESC as a minimum, not a maximum. In addition. corrective work, both on-and off-site needs to be included. Quantities shall reflect worse case scenarios not just minimum requirements. For example, if a salmonid stream may be damaged, some estimated costs for restoration needs to be reflected in this amount. The 30% contingency and mobilization costs are computed in this quantity. · * .. * NOTE: Per KCC 27A, total .bond amounts remaining after reduction shall not be less than 30% of the original amount (T) or as revised by major design changes. SURETY B9ND RIDER NOTE: If a bond rider is used, minimum additional perfon11ance bond shall be I $ 799,186.1 !(C+D)-E REQUIRED BOND' AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND MODIFICATION BY DOES Page 9 of 9 04009BOW03 Check out the DOES Web site at www metrokc govlddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 12/1/2004 ~ Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet @King County Department of Development & Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Soulhwest Renlon, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Project Name: Plat of Evendell Location: SE 136th St & 157th Ave SE Clearing greater than or equal to 5,000 board feet of timber? X yes If yes, Forest Practice Permit Number: (RCW76.09) Page 1 of 9 no L04GF042 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Date: 10-Nov-04 Project No.: t.. o l Po-o t-6 Activity No.: Ul 11"0018Afl83RE838 Lo4-5!< ozt Note: All prices include labor, equipment, materials, overhead and profit. Prices are from RS Means data adjusted for the Seattle area or from local sources if not included in the RS Means database. R~~dd r tJ.ffY~ ~?7 t1/3o/ZDof 04009BQW03.xls Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrakc.gov/ddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 04/22/02 Report Date: 11/30/2004 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Backfill & compaction-embankment ESC-1 Check dams, 4" minus rock ESC-2 SWDM 5.4.6.3 •crushed suliacing 1 1/4" minus ESC-3 WSDOT 9-03 9(3) Ditching ESC-4 Excavation-bulk ESC-5 Fence, silt ESC-6 SWDM 5.4.3.1 Fence, Temporarv (NGPE) ESC-7 Hydroseeding ESC-8 SWDM 5.4.2.4 Jute Mesh ESC-9 SWDM 5.4.2.2 Mulch, by hand, straw, 3" deep ESC-10 SWDM 5.4.2.1 Mulch, by machine, straw, 2" deep ESC-11 SWDM 5.4.2.1 Piping, temporary, CPP, 6" ESC-12 Piping, temporary, CPP, 8" ESC-13 Piping, temporary, CPP, 12" ESC-14 Plastic covering, 6mm thick, sandbagged ESC-15 SWDM 5.4.2.3 Rip Rap, machine placed; slopes ESC-16 WSDOT 9-13.1(2) Rock Ccnstruction Entrance, 50'x15'x 1' ESC-17 SWDM 5.4.4.1 Rock Construction Entrance, 100'x15'x1' ESC-18 SWDM 5.4.4.1 Sediment pond riser assembly ESC-19 SWDM 5.4.5.2 Sediment trap, 5' high berm ESC-20 SWDM 5.4.5.1 Sed. trap, 5' high, riprapped spillway berm section ESC-21 SWDM 5.4.5.1 Seeding, by hand ESC-22 SWDM 5.4.2.4 Sodding, 1" deep, level ground ESC-23 SWDM 5.4.2.5 Sodding, 1" deep, sloped ground ESC-24 SWDM 5.4.2.5 TESC Supervisor ESC-25 Water truck, dust control ESC-26 SWDM 5.4.7 WRITEilNgjm1:Ms••eittsee'2ages1r ttn MNI!II Concrete Vault I Page 2 of 9 $ 5.62 CY I 150001 $ 67.51 Each I 161 $ 85.45 CY $ 8.08 CY 275 $ 1.50 CY 15000 $ 1.38 LF 2400 $ 1.38 LF $ 0.59 SY $ 1.45 SY $ 2.01 SY $ 0.53 SY I 500001 $ 10.70 LF $ 16.10 LF $ 20.70 LF I 2001 $ 2.30 SY $ 39.08 CY I 51 $ 1,464.34 Each $ 2,928.68 Each l ff $ 1,949.38 Each I 11 $ 17.91 LF $ 68.54 LF $ 0.51 SY $ 6.03 SY $ 7.45 SY $ 74.75 HR I 101 $ 97.75 HR I $120.000.ool Each I 1 I ESC SUBTOTAL: 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: ESCTOTAL: COLUMN: 04009BQW03.xls Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 1 I 11 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 11 1T 11 1 I 1 I 84300 1080 2222 22500 3312 26500 4140 195 29291 19491 748 120000 $ 270,852.62 $ 81,255.79 $ 352,108.41 A Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 04/22/02 Report Date: 11/30/2004 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Backfill & Compaction-embankment GI· 1 $ 5.62 Backfill & Compaction-trench GI· 2 $ 8.53 Clear/Remove Brush, by hand GI -3 $ 0.36 Clearing/Grubbing/Tree Removal GI· 4 $ 8,876.16 Excavation -bulk GI· 5 $ 1.50 Excavation -Trench GI -6 $ 4.06 Fencing, cedar, 6' high GI· 7 $ 18.55 Fencing, chain link, vinyl coated, 6' hig r1GI -8 $ 13.44 Fencing, chain link, gate, vinyl coated, 2 GI· 9 $ 1,271.81 Fencing, split rail, 3' high GI -10 $ 12.12 Fill & compact -common barrow GI -11 $ 22.57 Fill & compact -gravel base GI -1; $ 25.48 Fill & comoact -screened topsoil GI -1, $ 37.85 Gabion, 12" deep, stone filled mesh GI -14 $ 54.31 Gabion, 18" deep, stone filled mesh GI· H $ 74.85 Gabion, 36" deeo, stone filled mesh GI-H $ 132.48 Grading, fine, by hand GI -1 $ 2.02 Grading, fine, with grader GI -H $ 0.95 Monuments, 3' long GI -19 $ 135.13 Sensitive Areas Sign GI -20 $ 2.88 Sodding, 1" deep, sloped ground GI· 21 $ 7.46 Surveying, line & grade GI· 2, $ 788.26 Surveying, lot location/lines GI -2, $ 1,556.64 Traffic control crew ( 2 flaggers} GI· 24 $ 85.18 Trail, 4" chipped wood GI -2! $ 7_59 Trail, 4" crushed cinder GI -2E $ 8.33 Trail, 4" top course GI -21 $ 8.19 Wall, retaining, concrete GI· 21 $ 44.16 Wall, rockery GI -2f $ 9.49 Page3of9 SUBTOTAL *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 04009BOW03.xls CY I I I 20001 11,240 ool 150001 CY I 3501 2,985.SOI 600J 5.11sooT 10501 SY Acre 2 17,752.32 2 17,752.321 91 CY 5750 s,625.ooT CY 400 _ _1_,624.00 650 _ :S639.ool 11501 LF LF Each LF CY CY CY SY SY SY SY SY Each I 51 675.651 121 1,621.56 Each SY Day I 1 I 788.261 21 1,576.521 11 Acre HR SY SY SY SF I 2,5001 110,400.ool SF 1125 10,676.25 144,901.98 48,572.40 Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 84,300.001 8,956.Sol 79,885.44 4,669.00 788.26 !78,599.20 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 11/30/2004 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet :,:;:;::{({fY~~re'.P~t>.i.!C} \jl:\ill!lb1f i1i1;fffjr.JI!II\]I :<-auant< RbA0"••11111PROVEMENT•••>•··•·• .... {Nb: AC Grinding, 4' wide machine< 1000s· RI -1 $ 23.00 SY AC Grinding, 4' wide machine 1000-200< RI -2 $ 5.75 SY AC Grinding, 4' wide machine > 2000s RI -3 $ 1.38 SY AC Removal/Disposal/Repair RI -4 $ 41.14 SY Barricade, type I RI -5 $ 30.03 LF Barricade, type Ill (Permanent) RI -6 $ 45.05 LF Curb & Gutter, rolled RI -7 $ 13.27 LF l 1 I 33001 43,791.00 Curb & Gutter, vertical RI -8 $ 9.69 LF j 25ooJ 24,225.0oj Curb and Gutter, demolition and dispos RI -9 $ 13.58 LF Curb, extruded asphalt RI -10 $ 2.44 LF Curb, extruded concrete RI -11 $ 2.56 LF Sawcut, asphalt, 3" depth RI -1~ $ 1.85 LF Sawcut, concrete, per 1" depth Rl -1~ $ 1.69 LF Sealant, asohalt RI -14 $ 0.99 LF Shoulder, AC, ( see AC road unit price )<I -1 $ -SY Shoulder, gravel, 4" thick RI -16 $ 7.53 SY Sidewalk, 4" thick RI -17 $ 30.52 SY I 11001 33,572.ool 9251 28,231.00 Sidewalk, 4" thick, demolition and disp~ RI-H $ 27.73 SY Sidewalk, 5" thick RI -1 $ 34.94 SY Sidewalk, 5" thick, demolition and disnnc RI -20 $ 34.65 SY Sign, handicap . RI -21 $ 85.28 Each Striping, per stall RI -2; $ 5.82 Each Striping, thermoplastic, ( for crosswalk RI -2, $ 2.38 SF 1 12ol 285.601 I I sot IStriping, 4" reflectorized line RI -24 $ 0.25 LF I 56001 1,400.001 Page 4 of9 SUBTOTAL 59,482.60 72,022.00 *KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. · 04009BOW03.xls Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 119.00 119.00 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 11/30/2004 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet For KCRS '93, (additional 2.5" base) add RS -1 $ 3.60 AC Overlay, 1.5" AC RS· 2 $ 7.39 AC Overlay, 2" AC RS -3 $ 8.75 AC Road, 2", 4" rock, First 2500 SY RS -4 $ 17.24 AC Road, 2", 4" rock, Qty. over 2500S RS· 5 $ 13.36 AC Road, 3", 4" rock, First 2500 SY RS-6 $ 19.69 AC Road, 3", 4" rock, Qty. over 2500 S !RS-7 $ 15.81 AC Road, 5", First 2500 SY RS -8 $ 14.57 AC Road, 5", Oty. Over 2500 SY RS -9 $ 13.94 AC Road, 6", First 2500 SY RS -1 $ 16.76 AC Road, 6", Qty. Over 2500 SY !Rs. 11 $ 16.12 Asphalt Treated Base, 4" thick RS -1 $ 9.21 $ 11.41 7.53 21.51 IPCC Road, 6", no base, over 2500 SY !Rs -1~ $ 21.87 !Thickened Edge RS-1~ $ 6.89 Page 5 of9 SUBTOTAL *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 04009BOW03.xls SY I 35001 12,600.001 27701 9,972.00J 14501 SY SY SY 1 25001 43,100.00J 1450J SY I 2701 3,607.201 SY 2500 49,225.00 SY 1000 15,810.00 SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY LF 1 1 1 I 6401 77,635.00 56,679.20 Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 5,220.00 24,998.00 4,409.661 34,627.60 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 11/30/2004 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet o'RA1NAG.E:ii:::{£f=R::¥::i¢_qfrµQ~~~~::F:=1~~~-~::f.1AA;::tfl:?.::Br,:g_tj~V~l~t)H:,;,,, ::,>,:::,:,,:,,:,;;:;=~:::,:;:,::::,~br:·Ciihi~~=:¢t~i,~~~riiik=~:~fr~:~~~fu~d~:'A~iri~:.~~~&hlW:~q;;~::;~ffi~$fi~~?~~::~~d::~;~~~;,:,:,:,::::;.::::·.·,:·:··------ Access Road, R/D. I D -1 I $ 16.74 I SY Bollards -fixed I D -2 I $ 240.74 I Each 2 481.481 I I 452.34 Bollards -removable D -3 I $ 452.34 I Each • .{CBs include fram_e and lid) CB Type I D-4 I $ 1,257.64 I Each 12 15,091.68 22 27,668.08 CB Type IL D-5 I $ 1,433.59 I Each CB Type II, 48" diameter D -6 I $ 2,033.57 I Each 8 16,268.56 9 18,302.13 for additional de_Eth over 4' D -7 I $ 436.52 I FT 29 12,659.08 9 3,928.68 CB Type II, 54" diameter D-8 I$ 2,192.541 Each for additional de_e_th over 4' D -9 I $ 486.53 I FT CB Type II, 60" diameter D -101 $ 2,351.52 I Each 1 2,351.52 for additional de_e_th over 4' D-111$ 536.541 FT 536.54 CB Type II, 72" diameter D-121 $3,212.641 Each -- for additional de_e_th over 4' D -131 $ 692.21 I FT -- Throu_2h-curb Inlet Framework (Add) D-141$ 3 56.09 3 1,098.27 Cleanout.!. PVC,_ 4" D-15 $ 130.55 Each Cleanout.!. PVC.!. 6" D-16 $ 174.90 Each Cleanou_h PVC, 8" D-17 $ 224.19 Each Culvert, PVC, 4" D-18 $ 8.64 LF Culvert, PVC, 6" D-19 $ 12.60 LF Culvert.!. PVC, 8" D-20 $ 13.33 LF Culvert, PVC, 12" D-21 $ 21.77 LF Culvert, CMP! 8" D-22 $ 17.25 LF Culvert! CM P, 12" D-23 $ 26.45 LF Culvert! CM P, 15" D-24 $ 32.73 LF Culvert, CMP_!_ 18" D-25 $ 37.74 LF Culvert, CMP, 24" D-26 $ 53.33 LF Culvert, CMP, 30" D-27 $ 71.45 LF Culvert! CM P, 36" D-28 $ 112.11 LF Culvert, CMP, 48" D-29 $ 140.83 LF Culver\ CMP, 60" D-30 $ 235.45 LF Culvert, CMP, 72" D-31 $ 302.58 LF Page6of9 SUBTOTAL 46,587.95 52,250.41 *KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. 04009BQW03.xls Check out the DDES Web site atwww.metrokc.gov/ddes 2 2 11 3 17 53 481.48 904.68 13,834.04 6,100.71 7,420.84 2,351.52 9,269.70 40,362.97 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 11/30/2004 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet 21.02 Culvert, Concrete, 12" D-33 $ 30.05 Culvert, Concrete, 15" D-34 $ 37.34 Culvert, Concrete, 18" D -35 $ 44.51 Culvert, Concrete, 24" D-36 $ 61.07 Culvert, Concrete, 30" D-37 $ 104.18 Culvert, Concrete, 36'" D-38 $ 137.63 Culvert. Concrete, 42" D-39 $ 158.42 Culvert, Concrete, 48" D-40 $ 175.94 Culvert, CPP, 6" D-41 $ 10.70 Culvert, CPP, 8" D-42 $ 16.10 Culvert, CPP, 12" D-43 $ 20.70 Culvert, CPP, 15" D-44 $ 23.00 Culvert, CPP, 18" D-45 $ 27.60 Culvert, CPP, 24" D-46 $ 36.80 Culvert, CPP, 30" D-47 $ 48.30 Culvert, CPP, 36" D-48 $ 55.20 Ditching D-49 $ 8.08 Flow Dispersal Trench (1,436 base+) D-50 $ 25.99 French Drain (3' depth) D-51 $ 22.60 Geotextile, laid in trench, polypropylen D-52 $ 2.40 Infiltration pond testing D-53 $ 74.75 Mid-tank Access Riser, 48" dia, 6' dee D-54 $ 1,605.40 Pond Overflow Spillway D-55 $ 14.01 Restrictor/Oil Separator, 12" D-56 $ 1,045.19 Restrictor/Oil Separator, 15" D-57 $ 1,095.56 Restrictor/Oil Separator,'18" D-58 $ 1,146.16 Riprap, placed D-59 $ 39.08 Tank End Reducer (36" diameter) D-60 $ 1,000.50 Trash Rack, 12" D-61 $ 211.97 Trash Rack, 15" D-62 $ 237.27 Trash Rack, 18" D-63 $ 268.89 Trash Rack, 21" D-64 $ 306.84 Page 7 of9 SUBTOTAL *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 04009B0W03.xls JFutUie'lkubt:iCs:,:t'::===:-,--.-.· LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF 2700 LF LF l 518 10722.6 2181 45146.71 935 LF I 50 1150 73 1679 LF 1651 LF I 589 21675.2 LF --- LF --- CY I 50 404 LF LF SY HR Each SY 50 Each Each Each CY Each Each Each Each Each 33951.8 46825.7 Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 28890 19354.5 45541 700.5 1146.16 268.89 54914.05 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 11/30/2004 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet 2" AC, 2" top course rock & 4" borrow PL -1 $ 15.84 SY TAC, 1.5" top course & 2.5" base cou PL -2 $ 17.24 SY ,4" select borrow PL-3 $ 4.55 SY 1.5" to_e_ course rock & 2.5" base coursE PL -4 $ 11.41 SY l{such as detention/water quality vaults. No. 1Schoo1 Walkway Wl-1 Each Concrete Sidewalk Wl-2 $ 30.52 SY I Grading Wl-3 $ 5,000.00 LS Concrete Stairs Wl-4 $ 5,000.00 LS Metal Handrail Wl-5 $ 50.00 FT Wl-6 Wl-7 Wl-8 Wl-9 'M-10 SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL (SUM ALL PAGES): 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: GRANDTOTAL: COLUMN: Page 8 of9 140 4272.8 500 15,260.00 5,000.00 4,272.80 20,260.00 366,832.13 ,/ 296,609.71 ./ 110,049.64 88,982.91 476,881.77 ~ 385,592.62 ./ B C "KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. 0400980W03.xls Check out the DOES Web site at www_metrolcc.qov/ddes 50 60 1,526.00 5,000.00 3,000.00 9,526.00 318,148.82 ,/ 95,444.65 413,593.47 ./ D E Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 11/30/2004 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Original bond computations prepared by: Name: Plat of Evendell Date: 1 O-Nov-04 PE Registration Number: 33713 Tel.#: 425-885-7877 Firm Name: Address: Core Desi.ll_n, Inc. 14 711 NE 29th Place, Suite #101 Project No: LO IP ooJb ROAD IMPROVEMENTS & DRAINAGE FACILITIES FINANCIAL GUARANTEE REQUIREMENTS Stabilization/Erosion Sediment Control (ESC) (A) Existing Right-of-Way Improvements (B) Future Public Road Improvements & Drainage Facilities (C) Private Improvements (D) Calculated Quantity Completed PERFORMANCE BOND• AMOUNT $ 352,108.4 $ 476,881.8 $ 385,592.6 $ 413,593.5 Total Right-of Way and/or Site Restoration Bond•fH (First $7,500 of bond• shall be cash.) (A+B) $ 828,990.2 Performance Bond• Amount (A+B+C+D) ; TOTAL (T) $ 1,628,176.3 Minimum bond* amount 1s $1000. Reduced Performance Bond• Total••• Maintenance/Defect Bond• Total BOND· AMOUNT REQUIRED AT RECORDING OR TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY ••• (E) $ TX 0.30 $ 488,452.9 (T-E) $ 1,628,176.3 Use larger of Tx30% or ( 1-E) OR NAME OF PERSON PREPARING BOND• REDUCTION: Date: * NOTE: The word "bond" as used in this document means any financial guarantee acceptable to King County. ** NOTE: KCC 27 A authorizes right of way and site restoration bonds to be combined when both are required. PUBLIC ROAD & DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE/DEFECT BOND· (B+C) x 0.25 ; $ 215,618.6 The restoration requirement shall include the total cost for all TESC as a minimum, not a maximum. In addition, corrective work, both on-and off-site needs to be included. Quantities shall reflect worse case scenarios not just minimum requirements. For example, if a salmonid stream may be damaged, some estimated costs for restoration needs to be reflected in this amount. The 30% contingency and mobilization costs are computed in this quantity. -· NOTE: Per KCC 27 A, total bond amounts remaining after reduction shall not be less than 30% of the original amount (T) or as revised by major design changes. SURETY BOND RIDER NOTE: If a bond rider is used, minimum additional pertormance bond shall be I $ 799,186.1 I (C+D)-E REQUIRED BOND· AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND MODIFICATION BY ODES Page 9 of 9 04009BQWD3.xls Check out the ODES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 11/30/2004 ,', ... Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet (@)) Konig Coll.Dnty Department of Development & Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Project Name: Plat of Evendell "Early Start" Location: SE 136th St & 157th Ave SE Clearing greater than or equal to 5,000 board feet of timber? . / yes If yes, Forest Practice Permit Number: (RCW76.09) ~ L04-4Fo4-2 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Data: · 26-Au.9.-04 Project No.: l-o[Poo/6 Activity No.: L04SR057 Note: All prices include labor, equipment, materials, overhead and profit. Prices are from RS Means data adjusted for the Seattle area or from local sources if not included in the RS Means database . OK Cf-1--04:-!<-~. ov ro(L, ~~v,n ,),tn vu\ J 'f'{A., G~t<:Klv_ \_J-,lf(of 'f: 5 R ~,,.,J r ~ c_;f,.,.:t:-is ft 2.2 3, Otn) ~ • V Page 1 of9 . Ckjd_ ~ "ffy~ 7 ~~r Cf/5/=<f 04009BQW01.xls Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Unit prices updated• 02/12/02 Version: 04/22/02 Report Date: 09/03/2004 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet E1:1z1£:!1:, ::!;:::11.~:,;!*~:£.i.2i;,; :~ : :: ;,,:::2i¥:;:; 1t\iillif~it,i:,: :;r1:W~!i1i ~£:.: ::;:~t;A!; av-~!'::Stl .tmza11ra. •EROstON'ISEDIMENTJltlNTRtftL·:x:~:·<·.·:;· Nuffl)sext ;;··:t·:'"·Jwtt(AF.<it·X/ \~:~\/$b\/J# -~Jt'!;;;f P\At: ··)@,,fltttr:,-~--,j(K #t? ,.,.~./~Y~:tt\tTb.d?:. Backfill & compactio-mbankment ESC-1 $ 5.62 1 84300 Check darns, 4" minus rock ESC-2 SWDM 5.4.6.3 $ 67.51 Each 16 1 1080 Crushed surfacing 1 1/4" minus ESC~ WSDOT 9-03.9(3). $ 85.45 CY Dttching I ESC-4 I I $ 8.08 I CY 275 1 2222 Excavation-bulk I ESC-5 I I $ 1.50 I CY 15000 1 22500 Fence, silt IESC-6 I SWDM 5.4.3.1 I$ 1.38 I LF 2400 1 3312 Fence, Temporary (NGPE) IE:SC-7 I I$ 1.38 I LF 500 1 690 Hydroseeding IESC-8 I SWDM 5.4.2.4 I $ 0.59 I SY Jute Mesh IESC-9 I SWDM 5.4.2.2 I$ 1.45 I SY Mulch,J>y_h~r,d, straw, 3" deep IESC-10 I SWDM 5.4.2.1 I$ 2.01 I SY Mulch, by machine, straw, 2" deep I ESC-11 I SWDM 5.4.2.1 I $ 0.53 I SY 50000 1 26500 Piping, temporary, CPP, 6" IESC-12 I I $ 10.70 I LF Piping, temporary, CPP, 8" ~ IESC-13 I I·$ 16.10 I LF Piping, temJlOrary, CPP, 12" IESC-14 I I $ 20.70 I LF 200 1 4140 Plastic covering, 6mm thick, sandbagged jESC-15 I SWDM 5.4.2.3 I $ 2.30 I · SY Rip Rap, machine placed; slopes IESC-16 I WSDOT 9-13.1(2) I $ 39.08 I CY 5 1 195 Rock Construction Entrance, S0'x15'x1' IESC-17 I SWDM 5.4.4.1 I $ 1,464.34 I Each Rock Construction Entrance, 100'x15'x1' IESC-18 I SWDM 5.4.4.1 I $ 2,928.68 I Each 1 2929 Sediment pond riser assembly jESC-19 I SWDM 5.4.5.2 I $ 1,949.38 I Each 1 1949 Sediment trap, 5' high berm jESC-20 I SWDM 5.4.5.1 I $ 17.91 I LF Sed. trap, 5' high, Jiprapped spillway berm section _ _lESC-~1 I SWDM5.4.5.1 I $ 68.54 I LF Seeding, by hand ESC-22 SWDM 5.4.2.4 $ 0.51 SY Sodding, 1" deep, level round ESC-23 SWDM 5,4.2.5 $ 6.03 SY Sodding, 1" deep, sloped ground IESC-24 I SWDM 5.4.2.5 I$ 7.45 I SY TESC Supervisor IESC-25 I . I $ 74.75 I HR 10 1 748 10 1 978 .1watertruck, dust control fESC-26 J SW0M 5.4.7 I$ 97.75 I HR iwlttalt®lmMsiffltl(fief pitpti9)1i@I!lIMMi!!!MlM1liff ' . '•---" ..... SPA1rr1a,;r GefleRilt& \Jaun Kemova1 $ 20,000.00 Each ::;;=u1i&i~~tJfi.x •.. ::$S-itJ<<S'·~.)\:-:-~:Y:~:·::~,:, 1 20000 Page 2 of 9 04009BQW01.xls 1 ESC SUBTOTAL: 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: ESCTOTAL: -COLUMN: Check out the ODES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes $ 171,542.62 $ 51,462.79 $ 223,005.41 A Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 04/22/02 Report Date:· 09/03/2004 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet rBackfill & Compaction-embankment GI -1 $ 5.62 Backfill & Com=ction-trench Gl-2 $ 8.53 'clear/Remove Brush, bv hand GI -3 $ 0.36 Clearing/Grubbing/Tree Removal Gl-4 $ 8,876.16 Excavation -bulk Gl-5 $ 1.50 Gl-6 $ 4.06 Gl-7 $ 18.55 Gl-8 $ 13.44 $ 1,271.81 $ 12.12 $ 22.57 Gl-12 $ 25.48 Gl-13 $ 37.85 Gl-14 $ 54.31 GI -15 $ 74.85 rGabi~n. 36"' deeo, stone filled mesh GI -16 $ 132.48 !Grading, fine, bv hand GI -1' $ 2.02 0.95 135.13 $ 2.88 :round jGI -21_] $ 7.46 $ 788.26 IGI -23 $ 1,556.64 GI -24 $ 85.18 !Trail,4" chi~_wood -IGI -25 $ 7.59 Gl-26 $ 8.33 Gl-27 $ 8.19 Wall, retainln!:J, concrete Gl-28 $ 44.16 Wall, rockery JGl-29 $ ·9.49 -Page 3 of 9 SUBTOTAL "KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. 04009BQW01 l:il:::;l:;Q Q;::i;.;; :ltl'"'.. • =-1 -a. " *-:::ii:=:. CY CY SY Acre CY CY LF LF Each LF CY CY CY SY SY SY SY SY Each Each SY Da Acre HR SY SY SY SF SF Check out the ODES Web sJm at www.metrgkc.aoylddes --= ai:~a::--~--~;:&-:!:::::::--El!l •···.!-~-JI Untt prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 8/26/2004 Rl-5 Barricade, type Ill ( Pennanent) Rl-6 Curb & Gutter.!. rolled RI-7 Curb & Gutter, vertical I RI -8 Curb and Gutter, demolition and disposal RI -9 Curb, extruded asphalt I RI -10 Curb, extruded concrete Rl-11 Rl-12 ,r 1· de.e_th Rl-13 Rl-14 Shoulder, AC,_( see AC road unit price ) I RI -15 Shoulder, gravel, 4• thick. Rl-16 Sidewalk.!. 4• thick Rl-17 Sidewalk~· thick, demolition and dis1 Rl-181 Sidewalk, 5" thick Rl-191 Rl-20 Rl-21 Rl-221 for crosswalk 11 RI -23 Striping, 4• reflectorized line Rl-241 Page4of9 "KCC 27 A authonzes only one bond reduction. 040098QW01 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet $ 5.75 $ 1.38 $ 41.14 $ 30.03 $ 45.05 $ 13.27 $ 9.69 $ 13.58 $ 2.44 $ 2.56 $ 1.85 $ 1.69 $ 0.99 $ - $· 7.53 $ 30.52 $ 27.73 $ 34.94 $ 34.65 $ 85.28 $ 5.82 $ 2.38 $ 0.25 SUBTOTAL SY SY SY LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF SY SY SY SY SY SY Each Each SF LF Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrpkc.gov/ddes -.~, .... fi ra''il"''" ·1,·:, ~-. .a>".':-~va.,,r}i;: --¥"''~ :~-~.~~~~r~: -~"";..~,.,. "1f~:-., q,, ,q _<1:: :1Ef • ...c:-,..-"',..c' . ""· 1. . ...: Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22102 Report Date: 8/26/2004 For KCRS '93, (additional 2.5" base) add RS -1 AC Over1av, 1.5" AC RS-2 AC Overlay, 2" AC RS-3 IAC Road, 2", 4" rock, First 2500 SY RS-4 AC Road, 2", 4" rock, Qtv. over 2500SY RS-5 AC Road, 3", 4" rock, First 2500 SY RS-6 IAC Road, 3", 4" rock, Qtv. over 2500 SY RS-7 ci, 5", First 2500 SY RS-8 IAC Road,_5"~q_ty. Over 2500 SY RS-9 RS-1 . Over 2500 SY B_S-1 RS-1 Gravel Road, 4" rock, First 2500 SY RS-1 Gravel Road, 4• rock, ntv. over 2500 SY ~S-1 PCC Road, 5", no base, over 2500 SY ~S-1 PCC Road, 6", no base, over 2500 SY ~S-1 ·Thickened ~e ~S--1, Page 5 ot9 "KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. 04009BQW01 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet $ 3.60 SY $ 7.39 SY $ 8.75 SY $ 17.24 SY $ 13.36 SY $ 19.69 SY $ 15.81 SY $ 14.57 SY $ 13.94 SY $ 16.76 SY $ 16.12 SY $ 9.21 SY $ 11.41 SY $ 7.53 SY $ 21.51 SY $ 21.87 SY $ . 6.89 LF SUBTOTAL Check out the DOES Web site at www.met,pkc.gov/ddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4122/02 Report Date: 8/2612004 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet 'r,;;!,'t'rvJk ,;· ic.~~!:.i,:, ~;i\l ~,~, ,,;; ,;tJ~~'·;~:~gxiil10.g'';,'J':_:i;,~~o/ •"fll.~'lj>~''"'i;~iJ/'"'i,/~~.,~ i~"' '':i,~~ lLy ~ i · ;l,'~4'.it' ,?.. ·• . ';•' . ~;if jr, ~'~''t:i' ,Jtm rir"),~~i'--~ J !"i~~a'fiiii"~'f =·:f.>j~~ ·. -~:;j~f~ ,:,,'{1 .. t~~-t::::c~ ·,(~ i~~ c_,;.,,t\~,-f. /~,C• '" :\-s~, i,;•'Ei '-'"'°~'" ,; ; ~ t#.'J•,~"";, 1~ ~~ "'" ,,yt \". "·.l' ~&t\a1ffiii;~·-~cUltl ': · .• k~,"' •>j> ,,;_,, "1 ~~li' Jtf"> ',; ·", °7• ,_,_ • " -~ --;;.,,....,___ -· -\> .• ~ -.,.._,.,_ ........ ___ .._ __ ·"',--~ .. _ ....... ~, _,4-...,.::..E..,,,....i,.:,.,-~.~-,. '·-.,, ' --~ ................. , .... --.... . ' ,--• ~.~-'rt'"-""-":. ; 1" · !.1'~" ''i.{(•£'"'·~:l,'© '''"''il''"''eJ·~·c'l!I' •;§fl· .· ... , ~CJ!i;·' · ·-,,~~-•$ · '11\:itl)Tii!W\>l,''!\:.,;,;. ""j:'-i,, 'i't.""~'<"-""''1·' ,e-_,.:,,_ ".;.i _· ·,_,.;, J:t,...·-._ .... :._--.--.'n ·,· ,...·,. OIFn anL .. :~c:;,;;.-=....J"L,QS,·~-· ~-' .-~,'lie-· 1-c • · -~. , • , ... , •. , _. -•.••it -~ ---• iBA'Jt,,l~"~.,;,.~-&-.~iile'jea11u;i;~~~'l,1~emi·.::~t;::~;;i·.~&o~i~~---~~-"" Access Road, R/0 D-1 Bollards -fixed D-2 Bollards ~ removable D-3 "' lCBs indude frame and lid\ CB Tvne I D-4 CBTvne IL D-5 CB TvnA 11, 48" diameter D -6 for additional depth over 4' D-7 CB TvnP. II, 54• diameter D -8 for additional depth over 4' D • 9 CB Tvne II, so· diameter D-10 for additional depth over 4' D-11 CB TvnA II, 72" diameter D -12 for additional depth over 4' D-13 Through-rurb Inlet Framework (Addl D-14 Cleanout PVC, 4" D -15 Cleanout, PVC, 6" . D-16 Cleanout, PVC, 8" D-17 Culvert, PVC, 4" D-18 Culvert, PVC; 6" D -19 Culvert, PVC, 8" D • 20 Culvert, PVC, 12" D • 21 Culvert, CMP, 8" D-22 Culvert, CMP, 12" D • 23 Culvert, CMP, 15" D-24 Culvert, CMP, 18" D-25 Culvert, CMP, 24" D-26 Culvert, CMP, 30" D-27 Culvert, CMP, 36" D-28 Culvert, CMP, 48" D-29 Culvert, CMP. 60" D • 30 Culvert, CMP, 72" D-31 . Page6of9 'KCC Z1 A authorizes only one bond reduction, 04009BQW01 $ 16.74 SY $ 240.74 Each $ 452.34 Each $ 1,257,64 Each $ 1,433.59 Each $ 2,033.57 Each $ 436.52 FT $ 2,192.54 Each $ 486.53 FT $ 2,351.52 Each $ 536.54 FT $ 3,212.64 Each $ 692.21 FT $ 366.09 Each $ 130.55 Each $ 174.90 Each $ 224.19 Each $ 8.64 LF $ 12.60 LF $ 13.33 LF · $ 21.77 LF $ 17.25 LF $ 26.45 LF . $ 32.73 LF $ 37.74 LF $ 53.33 LF . $ 71,45 LF $ 112, 11 LF . $ 140,83 LF $ 235.45 LF $ 302.58 LF SUBTOTAL Check out the DOES Web site at www.meliokc,pov(ddes . ·,:,,.·<.:;:;,_-;·· .... ~·~~-·,;tait· ... ~,c 1~ ~, ... , ... o: !<iliaii.Mf , . . ·,;;:., ,, .. ,,·, .. '! .. · . . Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4122/02 Report Date: 8/2612004 ', _/ Culvert, Concrete, 8" Culvert, Concrete, 12" Culvert, Concrete, 15" 0-34 Culvert, Concrete, 18" 0-35 Culvert, Concrete, 24" 0-36 Culvert, Concrete, 30• 0-37 Culvert; Concrete, 36" 0-38 Culvert, Conaete, 42• 0-39 Culvert, Concrete, 48" 0-40 Culvert, CPP, 6" 0-41 Culvert, CPP, 8" D-42 ·•culvert, CPP, 12"' D-43 Culvert, CPP, 15" D-44 Culvert, CPP, 18" D-45 Culvert, CPP, 24" D-46 Culvert, CPP, 3Q_" _ D-47 D-48 D-49 D-50 D-51 D-52 D-53 Mid-tank Access Riser, 48" dia, 6' deeo D-54 Pond Overflow Soillwav D-55 Restrictor/Oil Separator; 1'Z' D-56 Restrictor/Oil Separator~ __ D-57 0-58 D-59 'Tank End Reducer c35• diameter) · 0-60 Trash Rack, 12" D-61 Trash Rack, 15" D-62 l'T rash Rack, 1 S-D-63 Trash Rack; 21" .D-64 Page.7 of9 'KCC 27 A authorizes only cine bond reduction. 04009BQW01 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet $ 37.34 LF $ 44·,51 LF $ 61.07 LF $ 104.18 'LF $ 137.63 LF $ 158.42 LF $ 175.94 LF $ 10.70 LF $ 16.10 LF $ 20.70 LF $ 23.00 LF $ 27.60 LF $ 36.80 LF $ 48.30 LF $ 5520 LF. $ 8.08 CY $ 25.99 LF $ 22.60 LF $ 2.40 SY $ . 74.75 HR $ 1,605.40 Each $ 14.01 SY $ 1;045.19 Each $ 1,095.56 Each $ 1,146.16 Each $ 39.08 CY $ 1,000.50 Each $ 211.97 Each $ 237.27 Each $ 268.89 Each $ 306.84 Each SUBTOTAL Check out the ODES Web sif11 at www.metrokc.gov/ddes. . . · Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4122.102 Report Date: 8/26.12004 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet 12· AC, 'Z' top course rock & 4" borrow PL; 1 $ 15.84 SY 12• AC, 1.5" too course & 2.5" base cou PL-2 $ 17.24 SY 14" select borrow PL-3 $ 4.55 SY 1.5" top course rock &. 2.S-base course PL-4 $ 11.41 SY Wl-1 . Each Wl-2 SY Wl-3 CY Wl-4 LF Wl-5 FT Wl-6 Wl-7 Wl-8 Wl-9 Wl-10 SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL (SUM ALL PAGES): 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: Page 8019 "KCC 27 A authorizes ooly one bond reduction. 04009BQW01 GRANDTOTAL: COLUMN: B C Check out Uie DOES Web site at www.metn>kc.gov/ddes D ;.~,~~ ~~~~,~~~}·!;_-,~"-~'."-P:;~~ ·E Untt prtces updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4122/02 Report Date: 8/2612004 _,-' . . . -.. . . Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Original bond computatk>ns prepared by: Name: PE Registration Number: Finn Name·: Address: Plat of Evendell "Earll'._ Start" 33713 Core Desi9!!.,_ Inc. 14711 NE 29th Place, Suite #101 Date: 26-Aug-04 Tel.#: 425-885-7877 Project No: Lo I fO"O lb ROAD IMPROVEMENTS & DRAINAGE FACILITIES_ FINANCIAL GUARANTEE REQUIREMENTS Stabilization/Erosion Sediment Control (ESC) Existing Right-of-Way Improvements (A) PERFORMANCE BOND• AMOUNT $ 2 2. 3/ o__o_-q_.~ (B) ~$'--------- Future Public Road Improvements & Drainage Facilities I (Cf $ ~-----------· Private Improvements Calculated Quantity Completed Total Right-of Way and/or Stte Restoration Bond*/** _ (First $7,500 of bond•.shall be cash.) (DJ $ ~------- o-0 (A+B) $ 2.'2..3 000 •- BOND• AMOUNT REQUIRED AT RECORDING OR TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY - (E) $ PUBLIC ROAD & DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE/DEFECT BOND* - · Performance Bond• Amount (A+B+C+D) = TOTAL (T) $ IJ. A, Tx0.30 $ --'-------OR Minimum bond* amount 1s $1 o·oo. Reduced Performance Bond* Total -(T-E) $ - Use larger of Tx30% or (T-E} Maintenance/Defect Bond* Total NAME OF PERSON PREPARING BOND* REDUCTION: * NOTE: The word "bond" as used in this document means ·any financial guarantee acceptabte to King Cou~ty. -·NOTE: KCC 27A authorizes right of way and site restoration·bonds to be combined when both are required. (B+C) X 0.25 = --".$ ______ _ Date: The restoration requirement shall indude the total cost for all TESC as a minimum, not a maximum .. In addition, corrective work, both on-and off-site needs to be included. Quanmies shall reflect worse case scenarios not jllst minimum requirements. For example, if a salmon id stream may be damaged, some estimated costs for restoration needs to be reflected in this amount. The 30% contingency and mobilization costs are computed In this quantity . ....., NOTE: Per KCC 27 A. total bond amounts remaining aftef' reduction shall not be less than 30% of the original amount (T} or as revised by major design changes. 'SURETY BOND RIDER NOTE: If a bond rider Is used, minimum additional performance bond shall be i $ -!(C+D}-E REQUIRED BOND· AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND MODIFICATION BYDDES Page 9of9 04009BQW01 · Check out the ODES Web site at www.me;rokc.gov!ddes Unit pri~ updated: 02/12/02 · Version: 4122/02 Report Date: 8/26/2004 tQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov July 30, 2007 SB! Developing LLC ATTN: Kurt Wilson PO Box 73790 Puyallup, WA 98373 RE: Financial Guarantee Forfeiture Initiation and Time Extension Project Name: Evendell Plat Project Number: LOIPOOl6 Inspect Activity No.: L04Sll 88 Location: 1601h Ave SE and SE 1361h St Financial Guarantee Number(s): 2123284 Dear Mr. Wilson: The referenced plat was recorded on, July 26, 2005. Per the terms of the financial guarantee(s) and the King County Code (Code), this project was to receive Final Construction Approval (FCA) for all site and right-of-way improvements within two years from recording. It is now past that date and final construction approval has not been obtained. Although.the Code defines the period to make all required improvements to be two years from the date of recording, it states further, "the time limit for performance guarantee compliance · may be extended by six months at the director's discretion ..... ". Therefore, in order to allow sufficient time to address the requirements for FCA, a six month extension is being granted. This extension is given with the understanding that all conditions for FCA will be met no later than January 26, 2008. As part of the extension process an acceptable schedule for the completion of the required improvements is required. Please submit the schedule to me at the above letterhead address or via e-mail at Tim.Cheatum@kingcounty.gov Evendell Plat July 30, 2007 Page 2 Because forfeiture actions have been initiated against your performance guarantee your project has entered into DEFAULT status and it is no longer subject to the Land Use Inspection Section Project Management Program. From the date of this letter hourly charges and fees, for site inspections, will charged to activity number L07SII 56. Please Note: Failure to complete the requirements for final construction approval within the specified time limit will result in forfeiture of the financial guarantee(s). In accordance with the terms of the financial guarantee agreement, the obligation to perform work and pay fees or other amounts is not limited to the amount of the associated financial guarantee. If you have any questions concerning this letter or the financial guarantee forfeiture process please contact me at 206-296-7232 or by e-mail at Tim.Cheatum@kingcounty.gov If you have any questions relating to the financial guarantees for this project, please call the Financial Guarantee Management Unit at 206-296-6659. Sincerely, Tim Cheatum, Engineer II Financial Guarantee Compliance Engineer Land Use Inspection Section cc: !CW Group Jay Young, Engineer II, Inspector Financial Guarantee Management Unit ~ • King County SUBDIVISION, SHORT SUBDIVISION ANDPLANNEDITDEVELOPMENT Department of Development and Environmental Service 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206·296·6600TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov D Within the City of:---------------- Project Name: f;vc& PCc.<-. r"LAT Project No.: LO/ Poo16 Addres S : _t~?~6=0~t..,__~L-S:::~l.~_-t_~·-·~A~"~:£-~S~(.~----- Street Tree Inspect Activity No.: ___ ~~o'-'S~S=X=0~~~2~---- On '1-/ ~ -o 7 it was determined that the street trees required for the project listed aboVe have been installed. The minimum 2 year maintenance period as required by King County Code shall commence on I, -I "J ·07 FINANCIAL GUARANTEE INFORMATION If you have questions concerning the status of the financial guarantee, please contact the Financial Guarantee Management Unit at 206-296-6659. Financial Guarantee Activity No. : A OS' 13N Zk Z. KING COUNTY REPRESENTATIVE DEVELOPER REPRESENTATIVE Name :_~K~u=lt.~:f: ___ W=,~·t~s~o~,-J~----------- S tree t : _,_/ D"-'-t "'o __ s:L·~-I.._..1..,~'--t',-~5r.=,1,0£T='-+j ~Scc"c.c;_,_f<=.c._cc'#"c..,Jc,t,'-"!>' City: ,::'.fof,u,L v.J4-Y State: 1.4A Zip: 'z 'bofl3_ Original: Developer Copy 1' FGMU S/fonns/current forms/StreetTreelnstallAprvl.doc 09· 14--06 Posted Amount Street Tree $-3.2_ o7Z.~ Copy 2: File Copy 3: Inspector soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August I 0, 2006 Summary of Charges and Payments Applicant: $37,072 STREET TREE PERF Descri~_tion -· -· Non,Cash Bond Deposit:' SUB TOTAL CHARGES: ,·,,1' Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Page I of I A05BN262 L01P0016 BOND RECEIVED Amount $37,072.00 $37,072.00 ~-------~ --• r -• ---• :fay1nents D~scription Non,Cash Bond , Check # . Checklog.id. .. ,,.1.i;,·. ,-, ·.I"• . 1·, .! . ,,: · i''-r>,1 SUB TOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: ------- Payee 's;i9}6:iWEi'L PERE,:·, ·. Date Entered .iit 4120/is· . . . Amount ($37,072.00i ($37,072.00) $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to ODES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES iss':'es.Final.Approval, T.C,O. or C.O. ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Kurt Wilson SB! Developing, LLC PO Box 73790 Puyallup, WA 98373 RE: Landscape Financial Guarantee Reduction ODES File Number: LO 1 POO 16 Project Title: Evendell Dear Mr. Wilson: February 28, 2007 The compliance landscape installation inspection for the above-referenced project was completed. Based on this inspection, it has been determined that the landscaping has now been installed per the approved landscape plans and King County Zoning Code 21.51.070. Therefore, we are reducing the following performance financial guarantee: Landscape Performance surety bond, number 2159292, in the amount of $17,700, issued by Insurance Company of the West to SBI Developing, LLC,activity number A04BN482. By copy of this letter, King County hereby requests your surety company to issue a rider reducing the bond amount from $17,700 to $1,656 and changing the guarantee type from a performance guarantee to a maintenance guarantee. The remaining balance of$1,656.00 will be held as a two year maintenance financial guarantee. After the landscaping has been maintained for two years, we will perform a final landscape maintenance inspection. If the landscaping has been successfully maintained for the two-year period, we will process the release of your landscape maintenance financial guarantee. If you have any questions regarding this reduction, please contact me at 206-296-7009 . . Lcu1c:&0ft:..~ \ Sincerely, Stacy Graves Financial Guarantee Coordinator cc: Insurance Company of the West Steven C. Townsend, P.E., Supervising Engineer, Land Use Inspection Section ATTN: Tim Cheatum, Engineer Financial Guarantee Unit, Permit Center ® ) SUBDIVISION, .IORT SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 D Within the City of:---------------- D Landscaping D Recreational Equipment Project Name: Evendell Project No.: L01P0016 ---------------- Address: --------------------- Landscaping Inspect Activity No. L05SI040 On February 7, 2007 it was determined that the landscaping and/or recreational equipment required for the project listed above have been installed. The minimum 2 year maintenance period for landscaping only, as required by King County Code, shall corrunence on February 7,2007. PERFORMANCE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE INFORMATION If you have questions concerning the status of the following financial guarantee(s), please contact the Financial Guarantee Management Unit at 206-296-7009. Posted Amount Financial Guarantee Activity No. Financial Guarantee Activity No. A04BN482 Landscaping Recreation Equip. $17,700 * -~-~--- $ _______ * *If landscape financial guararitee(s) includes amount for recreational equipment and/or trail, landscape only portion is$ 5,520 . KING COUNTY Inspector: Tim Cheatu February 8, 2007 DEVELOPER REPRESEN TIVE 'V( 1'f / Of' I Name: Kurt Wilson% SBI Development, Inc. Street: __ P_O_B_O_X_7_3_7_9_0 __________ _ Puyallup State:_W_A~~-Zip: 98373 Original: Developer Copy I: FGMU SI forms/current forms/LandscapcRecEquipl nstallAprvl.doc 09-14-06 Copy 2: File soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 10, 2006 Summary of Charges and Payments Activity Number: Applicant: $17,700 LAND PERF Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Description Nim:C:ash Bond Deposit .,.. .··•· --.-, SUB TOTAL CHARGES: 0 Pay111ents · ·· · · Description Noil'"CaSfr00ild 1·,!·' 1:,·:r.;_:,·, \:,t Check# Checklogid Payee tri?1·1,,;;1,:-::·};:l~,;i;~:;Jt9J62,WE'fLi•·{ilf\·,1: Date Entered .. ,-... -...... , ... . ,,:, ,,71,1412005 Page I of I A04BN482 LOIP0016 BOND RECEIVED Amount $17,700.00 $17,700.00 Amount ($17,700.00) SUBTOTAL PAYMENTS: ($17,700.00) BALANCE: $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DOES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before ODES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. --·······-----. -··-· ---" ------ LANDSCAPE BOND QUANTI 'WORKSHEET FORM KING COUNTY PROJECT NAME: _(ILjJc...:....::t-tJ~lj)"-'(,,"'----"L,c.::V __ ---,------------ Dept. of Development J) r / ./ /' and Envirorunental Services DOES PROJECT#: --=\/_<'l_l'-\.,__o_O_\ "'----,,'---~=---"'-,cl_,::r:,.-=--l::)=-";JL...../-2------- 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest / Renton, WA 98055-1219 ADDRESS:---------------------------- 206/296-6600 PREPARED BY: _____________ PHONE:------ Bonds are based upon required landscaping only and will be posted for perfonnance and/or maintenance. Required landscaping includes perimeter landscaping, surface parking area landscaping, (KCC 21A. l 6) and any landscaping required by SEPA environmental review. The maintenance period is for the life of the project, however, after posting for maintenance, the pefformance bond will be reduced to 30% ($1,000.00 minimum) and be held for a two year period. Upon re-inspection of the site the bond will be released if the site has been properly maintained (21A.16.l 80). If the project has not been maintained and there are dead trees, s~bs, ground cover, or other deficiencies rioted in the required landscaoine, the bond will be held until the deficiencies are corrected. UNIT PRICE .UNITTYPE .. . QUANTITY PRICE SOD LAWN AREAS $500.00 MSF (1000 SQ. FT) HYDROSEEDING $50.00 MSF ( 1000 SQ. FT) . . SOIL PREPARATION A. TOPSOIL (6 INCHES DEEP) $25.00 CY (CUBIC YARD) ltb 45'.:o B. MULCH (2 INCHES DEEP) $4.00 SY (SQUARE YARD) 1.9'5 °?If \J,(.o , ' C. PEAT MOSS (TWO INCHES DEEP) $2.30 SY (SQUARE YARD) D. COMPOST (3 INCHES DEEP & TILLING $26.00 SY (SQUARE YARD) E. FERTILIZER $6.67 CY (CUBIC YARD) PLANT MATERIALS A. DECIDUOUS TREES . 1c:i( 1.75 -2.00" CALIPER (minimum height 1 O') $250.00 EACH COST&LABOR "vl 'vfb PERJMETER & PARKING AREAS . ' 1.5 -1.75" CALIPER $225.00 EACH COST&LABOR TNTER..IOR LANDSCAPING OR OTHER REQUIRED LANPSCAPING B. EVERGREEN TREES FIVE (5) FEET OR ABOVE $150.00 EACH COST&LABOR . C.SHRUBS $35.00EACH COST&LABOR BOND AMOUNT SUB TOTAL: SUB TOTAL BOND AMOUNT "v".\--, ? ~ () $ C:\DOCS\ANNAILANDSCAP\BONDQUAN.FRM 04/16/2001 4:3.S PM PAGE 1 OF2 soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 10, 2006 ) Summary of Charges and Payments Activity Number: Applicant: $11,200 STREET TREE PERF Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Description Non-Cash Bond Depbsit ,· SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Date Entered Description . Non-Cash Bond Check# C~!cklogid_ Payee · $55)40 LAN61REcri:Rfrd· · · i'Ii112ifos SUB TOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: ---------··--·----- Page I of I A05BN422 L03P0015 BOND RECEIVED Amount $1'1,200.00 $11,200.00 Amount .. ($11,200.00) ($11,200.00) $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DOES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or_C,O. soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August JO, 2006 ) Summary of Charges and Payments Activity Number: Applicant: $215,620 MAIN/DEFECT FG Project Number: Development Number: Perm it Type: Status: Description SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Description Check# Checklogid Payee Date Entered SUBTOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Page I of I A05BN392 LOIP0016 BOND OPEN Amount $0.00 Amount $0.00 $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DOES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. ---- soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 10, 2006 Page I of I Summary of Charges and Payments Applicant: $55,340 LAND/REC PERF FG Description N on,Ca;h B~nd Deposit. i SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: "··-. ~-. ', .. ,.. .. ,.. -'., i' l;!i ;:-• I ;;1.:, A05BN346 L03P0015 BOND RECEIVED Amount • '' ! ! .'$55)40.00 $55,340.00 )'ayrncnls . . . . ' ~es~-:_ipt}~n Non,Cash Bond Check# Checklogid Payee ,, , , , i. ' .... ,., s;ssj4'o"1.;ANDIRECPE°RTF0 . SUB TOT AL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: Date Entered Amount . .. ·-11iti2605 .• -, .. ·. ; ($55;340.00) ($55,340.00) $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to ODES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be P.a.ld in full before ODES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. soc ® ) King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055~12 I 9 August 10, 2006 Page I of I Summary of Charges and Payments ---~~~-~ ~-~-~~--~-~~~-~ --~~~----~~~~-, Applicant: $121,000 PERF/REST FG Description Cash-.B~nd;D.ep~sit.:',... . ,,., ... , •. ,. ,,, Non-Cash Bond Deposit SUB TOTAL CHARGES: ~'ay1111:11ts · - Description Check., Check# Checklogid Payee , l~f!S '..: ,,;;, :. ':: §Bji:>EY§LQPll':l9J[c;::' Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: ,,1,,::,: Non-Cash Bond Non°CashBond / • · · i: L rr <' ·;,.i: , ·; I ... $70,600 REST FG ·j;ss,i4riLANDIRECPERF FG .-.,·· ,r, Date Entered • . ~1~1700_5_ · 6/3/2005 , niiiioos ·1 · SUB TOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: A05BN208 L03POOl5 BOND RECEIVED Amount . _, $fso9.oo $113,500.00 $121,000.00 Amount .. ($7,5!)0.00) ($63, l 00.00) . ' ($50,400.00) ($121,000.00) $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to ODES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. -~~- soc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 10, 2006 Summary of Charges and Payments Applicant: $529,600 PERF/REST FG Description Cash Bond Qeposit Non-Cash Bond Deposit SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Description Non-<;:ash Bond . Check Check# Checklogid Payee Date Entered ··.Ni.312004·· 9/13/2004 ... ·.· _, .. "' , J~i,,;oq§j{E'.StE<(''.' __ 3797 Non:Cash Bond. Non-Cash Bond -·:_.-·1 ,-, -; $223,000 REST FG ·i;sfs990Ri;;sfF6~' .··. i •. ;_i'·,. •'' ,.-•••• ••• 7, •··''• • • •· ,,., ',., • • '' -•· ,,rnC• $529,600 PERF/REST FG SUBTOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: .. --· -·- )2/13/_2004 7/14/2005 Page I of I A04BN364 LOIP0016 BOND .RECEIVED Amount ·}1)00.00 $522, I 00.00 $529,600.00 Amount • 0 ($215,SQO.OO) ($7 ,500,00) ($605,9?0.00) $299,390.00 ($529,600.00) $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DDES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be -~~~ed t~ the ~_P_Plicant. ~~lf~_es must be paid in full bef~..": D~ES issues Final Approval, T.C.O,_or C.O. __ . UNIT PRICE UNIT TYPE JUANTITY PRICE • . ,EJ: GROUND COVER $4.00 EACH COST&LABOR MISCELLANEOUS TREE STAKES IJ, I ,(P-«,, $2.65 EACH PER STAKE & "vi D ~ t;'(,. ':,./ LABOR FENCING: LINEAR FOOT SOLID WOOD CEDAR $28.50 INCLUDES LABOR BERMING $17.50 LINEAR FOOT INCLUDES LABOR IRRIGATION 80¢ SQUARE FOOT RELOCATING TREES ON SITE 36" BALL $260.00 EACH 60" BALL $920.00 EACH . RELOCATING SHRUBS ON SITE 12" BALL $26.00 EACH 24" BALL $33.00 EACH ADDITIONAL ITEMS . . SUB TOTAL BOND AMOUNT BOND SUB TOT AL: $ "v'b, ~11- Add 30% of the Bond Sub-Total for Contingency in accordance with Financial Guarantee Ordinance 120220, Section 1~. Sub Total with Contingency: $ '3j, 1:,1, 1..., / TOTAL BOND AMOUNT TOT AL BOND PRICE: K1 $ ,}, .>".j.-v I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f!NAl COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PROGRAM FOR UNAVOIDABLE WETLAND ~MPACTS ASSOCIATED W~TH THE REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT OF SE 136 TH STREET EVENDELL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY SE 136TH STREET AND 160TH AVENUE SE KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. prepared for SBI DEVELOPING, LLC. @ Mr. Kurt Wilson, Project Manager P.O. Box 73790 Puyallup, Washington 98373 prepared by HABITAT TECHNOLOGIES P.O. Box 1088 o~ Puyallup, Washington 98371-1088 \O~ 'i,\'.e,'t~ 253-845-5119 x. \~sv£-C" \,~~" \)$ . '?I t\\\\l\ ~')\ \\ ···. c\\lP~ . R£-C" .. May 27, 2004 wetlands, streams, flstierles, wlldllfe •• mitigation and permitting solution.I!·. · P.O. Box 1088, Puyallup, Washington 98371 voice 253-845·5119 fax 253-841-1942 habltattech@qwest.net ·. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 • TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 IMPACT AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION ............................................................. 1 WETLAND, STREAM, AND WILDLIFE DETERMINATION ............... , ........................... 2 SELECTED ACTION ...................................................................................................... 3 SELECTED COMPENSATORY MITIGATION APPROACH .......................................... 5 o Mitigation Benefits ........................................................................................... 5 IJ Selected Mitigation Area .................................................................................. 5 DESCRIPTION OF THE MITIGATION PROGRAM ..................................................... 5 GOAL AND OBJECTIVE OF THE MITIGATION PROGRAM ...................................... 6 SELECTED PLANT COMMUNITIES .......................................................................... 7 IMPLEMENTATION INSPECTION .............................................................................. 7 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ................................................................................ 8 STANDARDS OF SUCCESS ...................................................................................... 8 iJ · Vegetation Sampling Methodology and Monitoring Schedule .......................... B D Vegetation Monitoring ...................................................................................... 9 G Vegetation Monitoring Sequencing ................................................................ 10 VEGETATION MAINTENANCE PLAN ...................................................................... 10 SEEDING FOR EXPOSED AREAS .......................................................................... 10 CONTINGENCY PLAN ............................................................................................. 11 TEMPORARY IRRIGATION ...................................................................................... 11 PLANTING NOTES ................................................................................................... 12 FINANCIAL GUARANTEE ............. : .......................................................................... 12 FIGURES ............................................................................................ , ......................... 13 REFERENCE LIST ....................................................................................................... 14 APPENDIX A ................................................................................................................ 15 APPENDIX B ................................................................................................................ 16 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I · INTRODUCTION This report details the FINAL COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PROGRAM to address unavoidable adverse impacts to a King County Class 2 Wetland as a result of the required development of SE 1361h Street. This roadway development has been defined as a condition of approval by King County as an element of the creation of the Evendell Residential Community. The project site was approximately 14 acres in total size and located at the southwest1arn corner of the intersection of SE 1361h Street (presently not open) and 1601 h Avenue SE, east to the City of Renton, King County (Figure 1). IMPACT AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION As an initial part of project site planning a wetland, drainage corridor, and wildlife habitats assessment was completed for the Evendell project site (see Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation, and Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Plan dated May 15, 2001). The project site was generally square in shape and located within a rapidly urbanizing areas. The project site was composed to · two (2) independent parcels. The eastern parcel was dominated by a mature Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) forest plant community on the periphery that had been planted following prior forest harvest actions. A single-family homesite dominated the northern portion of this eastern parcel and the remainder of the eastern parcel was dominated by dense thickets of blackberries (Rubus spp.) the had established following prior clearing. The western parcel was dominated by a single-family homesite and managed pasture. This assessment identified a King County Class 2 Wetland within a shallow swale in the northeastern portion of the project site. As defined within the final site development plan the development of this residential community would not require the filling or adverse impact of this wetland. In addition, the standard buffer area of 50-feet in width would be established along the outside boundary of this Class 2 Wetland. However, as a part of final project review and permitting King County identified that SE 1361h Street would need to be constructed along the entire northern boundary of the project site. The development of this public roadway would require the unavoidable filling of the northern tip of the onsite Class 2 Wetland -a filling of 225 square feet. No other impacts to the onsite wetland were required by this roadway development. The identified mitigation program presented within this document would restore a minimum of 550 square feet along the northern edge of the onsite Class 2 Wetland. This mitigation program would restore and enhance an existing degraded wetland area as a ratio of 2.0 to 1.0 (restored/enhanced wetland to impacted wetland). In addition, Tract P would be added to the overall established buffer to compensate for the impacts to the buffer along the northern edge of the onsite Class 2 Wetland. 1 Evendell-04065 FINAL MITIGATION PROGRAM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This mitigation program has been designed to ensure that proposed development of SE 135th Street does not result in a net loss of wetland functions or value, or that onsite development does not adversely impact the aquatic habitats within the retained areas. This compensatory mitigation program includes a five-year monitoring program to ensure the success of the goal and objectives of the overall compensatory mitigation plan. WETLAND, STREAM, AND WILDLIFE DETERMINATION Wetlands are transitional areas between aquatic and upland habitats. In general terms, wetlands are lands where the extent and duration of saturation with water is the primary factor determining the nature of soil development and the types of plant and animal communities living in the soil and on its surface (Cowardin, et al,, 1979). Wetlands are generally defined within land use regulations as "areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions" (1987 Manual). Wetlands exhibit three essential characteristics, all of which must be present for an area to meet the established criteria within the Wash. Manual and the 1987 Manual. These essential characteristics are: 1. Hydrophytic Vegetation: A predominance of plants that are typically adapted for life in saturated soils. 2. Hydric Soil: A soil that is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper horizons. 3. Wetland Hydrology: Permanent or periodic inundation, or soil saturation to the surface, at least seasonally. A stream is generally defined as a location where surface waters produce a defined channel or bed . .A defined channel or bed is typically an area which demonstrates clear evidence of the passage of water and includes, but not limited to, bedrock channels, gravel beds, sand and sil.t beds, and defined channel swales. A stream need not contain water year-round. A stream typically does not include irrigation ditches, canals, storm or surface water run-off devices, or other artificial watercourses unless the constructed watercourse conveys a stream which naturally occurred prior to the construction of such watercourse. The onsite assessment of wildlife species presence and available wildlife habitats was completed as a part of the onsite assessment of wetland characteristics. This assessment included both early morning and late afternoon observations. Species presence and habitat utilization were evaluated following the methods identified by Horner and Raedeke (1989) and within U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Publication 80/58 (Mikol, 1980). In addition, the King County Wildlife Study Guidelines (Draft Wildlife 2 Evendell-04065 FINAL MITIGATION PROGRAM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Management in King County, Issue Paper, 1993) were also followed to assure· . consistency with the King County permit process and documentation of habitat types. WETLAND SIZE CLASSIFICATION KING COUNTY FUNCTION STANDARD (USFWS) CLASS AND VALUE BUFFER RATING WIDTH A 17,162saft PFOC, PEME 2 Low 50 feet Wetland A was identified within a topographic drainage that passed generally from the central northern boundary to the southeast through the northeastern corner of the project site. This wetland was dominated by a young, mixed deciduous forest and emergent plant communities that had formed following prior forest harvest and grading actions. This plant community was very dense in the southern portion of the wetland and very open in the northern portion of the wetland. This wetland exhibited shallow ponding of surface water during the winter and early growing season as a result of topography, internal logging roads and draglines, a created berm, and an offsite roadway culvert. This wetland plant community ended adjacent to, but separated from, the roadside berm along 1601h Avenue SE along the eastern edge of the project site. Wetland A was identified to meet the USFWS criteria for classification as palustrine, forested, seasonally flooded (PFOC); and palustrine, emergent, seasonally flooded/saturated (PEME). Based on the young forested plant community, Wetland A was also identified to meet the criteria for designation as a King County Class 2 Wetland. Wetland A and the associated buffer were also identified to provide habitats for a wide range of wildlife species common to the local area. Two wildlife species identified by the State'of Washington as "priority species" were observed onsite. Black tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbel/us) are defined as priority species because these species are regulated as "game." The project site may also provide suitable habitats for other game species to include mourning dove (Zenaida marroura) and band-tailed pigeon (Columba fasciata). A single "state candidate" species -pileated woodpecker (Dryocopµs pileatus) -was also observed to utilize the forested wetland area along with the adjacent upland forested areas. No federally listed endangered, threatened, or candidate species, or critical habitats for such species, were observed onsite. SELECTED ACTION The selected action for the Evendell Residential Community is for the development of a residential community consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan and the approved preliminary plat. As a primary part of the planning of this selected action the project team has avoided all impacts to the identified onsite wetland and has 3 Evendell-04065 FINAL MITIGATION PROGRAM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I established a buffer of 50 feet in width consistent with the King County Environmentally Sensitive Areas Ordinance 21A.24. ' However, as a part of this residential development King County has required that SE 1361 h Street be constructed to County roadway standard along the northern boundary of the project site. As such, the development of this roadway would require the unavoidable filling of 225 square feet of the very northern tip of the identified onsite Class 2 Wetland. As discussed with King County environmental staff compensatory mitigation for this unavoidable wetland fill would be provided through the restoration and enhancement of the northern portion of the onsite wetland. The selected area for wetland restoration and enhancement has been impacted by prior land use actions, exhibits a limited plant community, and would be a minimum of 550 square feet in size ·(see attachment). The selected action would also fence the outer boundary of the established wetland buffer and attach standard King County buffer boundary signs at a SO-foot interval along the protective fencing. In addition, the selected action would include a five-year monitoring program to ensure the success of the wetland restoration and enhancement plan. · For purposes of Section 404 permitting administered by the ·seattle District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers the selected action would result in the adverse impact to 225 square feet (0.005 acres) of presently low functional value wetland. This wetland does not provide critical habitats for species listed pursuant to the Endangered Specie Act. WETLAND SIZE KING FUNCTION (square feet) COUNTY AND CLASS VALUE RATING A 17,162sqft Class 2 Low PROPOSED ACTION With the exception of 225 square feet of this wetland which is located within the area required for the development of SE 135th Street, all adverse impacts to this wetland would be avoided. A minimum of 550 square feet of this wetland would be restored and enhanced through the planting of native trees and shrubs. Tract P would be added to the overall buffer area. The outer boundary of this wetland would be established, fences, and posted with King County buffer boundary sians. 4 Evendell-04065 FINAL MITIGATION PROGRAM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SELECTED COMPENSATORY MITIGATION APPROACH Site planning for the Evendell Residential Community has focused on the mandated hierarchy of wetland impact reduction: 1) avoidance, 2) minimization, and 3) compensation. These avoidance and minimization strategies included a site design to avoid all adverse impacts to onsite wetland systems, except those minor impacts required by King County to create SE 1361h Street. The total amount of King County jurisdictional wetland area to be modified by the development of SE 135th Street equals 225 square feet (0.005 acres). As compensation for this unavoidable impact 550 square feet (0.012 acres) of degraded wetland area would be restored and enhanced through the planting of native trees and shrubs. In addition, Tract P would be added to the overall protective buffer established by this mitigation program. This compensatory action has been reviewed and approved by King County environmental staff. o Mitigation Benefits The restoration and enhancement of the northern tip of the existing Class 2 Wetland is designed to accompany site development. The primary benefits associated with the proposed restoration and enhancement includes the creation of a viable plant community composed of native shrubs and trees. The selected plant species would increase plant community and wildlife habitat diversity and complexity within the wetland area (Appendix A). The restored and enhanced wetland area would provide increased screening protections for the wetland area adjacent with the new public roadway. In addition, the addition of Tract P to the overall established buffer would provide · increased protection for the onsite wetland and additional retained wildlife habitats. o Selected Mitigation Area The selected mitigation area is located at the northern tip of the onsite Class 2 Wetland. The plant community within the selected area is presently limited as a result of prior land use actions. DESCRIPTION OF THE MITIGATION PROGRAM 1. As compensation for the unavoidable filling of 225 square feet (0.005 acres) of identified King County Class 2 Wetland the area directly south of the impacted wetland area shall be restored and enhanced through the planting of a variety of native trees and shrubs. The area to be restored shall be a minimum of 550 square feet (0.012 acres) in size. The selected species shall increase plant community and wildlife habitats diversity and complexity (see attachment). 5 Evendell-04065 FINAL MITIGATION PROGRAM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I· I 2. As compensation for the reduced buffer caused by the development of SE 1361h Street along the northern edge of the identified King County Class 2 Wetland the existing forested area in the northeastern corner of the project site (Tract P) shall be added to the overall buffer area (see attachment). 3. All onsite activities shall be monitored by the project biologist. Following the completion of onsite planting activities a "record-drawing" (i.e. "as-built") plan shall be prepared and submitted to King County. A five-year monitoring program shall be undertaken to assure the success of the compensatory mitigation program. 4. Temporary and long-term erosion control measures shall be implemented. These measures include silt fencing during site preparation and wetland planting, and seeding of all exposed soil areas. 5. The retained wetland and associated buffer shall be identified as separate tract. The outer boundary of this tract shall be fenced and posted with standard King County buffer boundary signs at a minimum interval of 50 feet. GOAL AND OBJECTIVE OF THE MITIGATION PROGRAllfl The GOAL of the compensatory mitigation program is to fully compensate for the unavoidable adverse impact to Wetland A caused by the required development of SE 1361h Street. The restoration and enhancement of a portion of the onsite wetland shall provide full compensation for unavoidable wetland impacts. Upon the completion of this mitigation plan there shall be no net loss of wetland functions or values. To achieve the defined GOAL, the following OBJECTIVES and PERFORMANCE CRITERIA have are defined: Objective A. The restored and enhanced compensatory mitigation area shall be a minimum of 550 square feet (0.012 acres) in total size. The restored and enhanced compensatory mitigation wetland area shall exhibit a scrub/shrub and sapling tree vegetation classes within five years following initial planting. Performance Criterion #A 1: As defined by plant count 100% of the trees and shrubs initially installed within the compensatory wetland area shall exhibit survival through the end of the first growing season following planting. · Performance Criterion #A2: As defined by plant count 80% of the trees and shrubs initially installed within the compensatory wetland area shall exhibit survival through the end of the fifth growing season following planting. 6 Evendell-04065 FINAL MITIGATION PROGRAM · I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Performance Criterion #A3: As defined by aerial coverage, invasive non-native species shall not exceed 15% at the end of the fifth growing season following planting within the restored and enhanced compensatory wetland area. SELECTED PLANT COMMUNITIES The plants selected for the restored and enhanced wetland area shall be obtained as nursery stock. These selected species are native and commonly occur in the local area. The plant species prescribed are selected to increase plant diversity, match present onsite communities, increase wildlife habitats, and enhance the aquatic environment (Appendix A). NUMBER COMMON NAME PROPOSED PROPOSED INDICATOR SCIENTIFIC NAME SPACING SIZE STATUS (oc) 4 Western red cedar (THP) 10 ft 4 ft height FAC Thuja plicata minimum 2 Sitka spruce (PIS) 10 ft 4 ft height FAC Picea sitchensis minimum 4 Douglas fir (PSM) 10 ft 4 ft height FACU Pseudotsuqa menziesii minimum 12 Western crabapple 8 ft 4 ft height FACW Pvrus fusca minimum 3 Black twinberry 4 ft 2 gal FAC+ Lonicera involucrata 6 Pacific ninebark 4 ft 2 gal FACW- Physocarpus caJJitatus 10 Red osier dogwood 4 ft 2 gal FACW Camus stolonifera 20 Sitka willow 4 ft 2gal FACW Salix sitchensis IMPLEMENTATION INSPECTION Essential to the success of the mitigation program is the accurate inspection of onsite activities immediately prior to and during the initial wetland restoration and enhancement phase. These activities include pre-implementation site inspection, onsite inspection and technical direction during wetland planting activities, and post-planting site inspection and evaluation. The pre-implementation site inspection allows the project team and the project biologist to evaluate and, if necessary, undertaken minor adjustments in the onsite implementation steps. These steps include analysis of project site elevation features, 7 Evendell-04065 FINAL MITIGATION PROGRAM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I project sequencing and timing, final grade analysis, unforeseen required minor modifications to the original establishment plan, and the establishment of environmental protections (silt fences, etc.) required during implementation. Onsite technical inspection during implementation and planting activities shall be implemented by the project biologist. The project biologist shall perform implementation oversight and address minor unforeseen implementation difficulties to assure that the intent of the compensatory mitigation program is met. The project biologist shall also be responsible for ensuring that the species and sizes of native plants selected and noted within the final planting plan are utilized during implementation. If selected native species. become unavailable, the project biologist shall consult with King County for substitute plant species to assure that the intent of the compensatory mitigation program is met. Post-implementation site inspection/ evaluation shall include the preparation of a "record-drawings" which shall be submitted to King County. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE PROJECT TASK TASK SCHEDULE Onsite ore-imolementation oroiect meetina Completed bv Aua. 15, 2004 Placement of protective fencing, final marking, and Completed by Aug. 30, 2004 identification of work area. Seedina of disturbed areas. Comoleted bv Seot. 15, 2004 lrriaation of restored and enhanced wetland. As needed followina seedina Plantina of restored and enhanced wetland area. Comoleted bv Nov. 15, 2004 Record-drawinas reoort to Countv Comoleted bv Dec. 5, 2004 Should this mitigation implementation not following the time period noted above the project team would coordinate a revised schedule with King County. PROJECT MONITORING Following the successful completion of the proposed wetland planting a five-year· monitoring and evaluation program shall be undertaken. The purpose of this program is to ensure the success of the selected mitigation as measured by an established set of performance criteria (see above). This monitoring may also provide valuable information on the effectiveness of mitigation procedures. STANDARDS OF SUCCESS o Vegetation Sampling Methodology and Monitoring Schedule The monitoring program shall count each plant initially installed within the restored and enhanced wetland area. The evaluation of the success of the compensatory mitigation 8 Evendell-04065 FINAL MITIGATION PROGRAM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I program shall be based on the selected survival rate for trees and shrubs. These defined performance criteria shall be applied at the times of yearly monitoring. The percent survival rate shall be based on combined counts of existing, volunteer plants, and planted species during vegetation monitoring. Sample location shall be shown on the "record drawings" (i.e. "as-built") plan, and shall correspond to identified photopoints. Trees and shrubs shall be visually evaluated to determine the rate of survivorship, health, and vigor of each plant. The categories to be used shall include live, stressed, tip dieback, basal sprouts, not found, apparently dead, and dead. o Vegetation Monitoring 1. As a part of each monitoring period the project biologist shall count the number of live plants initially planted within the representative sample plots. Plants shall be identified to species and observations of general plant condition (i.e., plant health, amount of new growth) shall be recorded for each plant. 2. Within the restored and enhanced wetland the project biologist shall count the number of undesirable invasive plants and estimate the aerial coverage (as if the observer were looking straight down from above) of these invasive plants. Undesirable plants include blackberries, Scot's broom, tarisy ragwort, reed canarygrass, and plants listed in the Washington State Noxious Weed List. 3. Within the restored and enhanced wetland the project biologist shall count the · number of desirable "volunteer" plants and estimate the aerial coverage of these plants. · ' 4. The project biologist shall take photographs that show the entire compensatory mitigation area. During the five-year monitoring period photos shall be taken in the same direction and at the same location to provide a series of photos. These photos shall show plant growth, plant species, and plant coverage. 5. Upon the completion of each annual monitoring period the project biologist shall prepare a report defining methods, observations, and resul_ts along with the date the observations were completed. Each report shall be provided to the County. 6. The monitoring schedule is defined as: A. Twice a year for two years following the completion of initial onsite planting. For each monitoring year, onsite monitoring would be completed once early in the growing season (late March to mid-April) and once again near the end of the growing season (mid-September). For each orisite monitoring activity an annual report would be prepared and provided to King County within three weeks after the completion of the fall monitoring. 9 Evendell-04065 FINAL MITIGATION PROGRAM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B. Once a year for years three, four, and five following the completion of initial onsite planting. For each monitoring year, onsite monitoring would be completed once near the end of the growing season (mid-September). For each onsite monitoring activity a report would be prepared and provided to King County within three weeks after the completion of onsite monitoring. o Vegetation Monitoring Sequencing MONITORING PLANT COMMUNITY SUBMITIAL OF MONITORING YEAR MONITORING REPORT YEAR-1 On or about April 15, 2005 On or about Sept. 15, 2005 Report due Oct. 7, 2005 YEAR-2 On or about April 15, 2006 On or about Sept. 15, 2006 Report due Oct. 7, 2006 YEAR-3 On or about Sept. 15, 2007 Report due Oct. 7, 2007 YEAR-4 On or about Sept. 15, 2008 Report due Oct. 7, 2008 YEAR-5 On or about Sept. 15, 2009 Report due Oct. 7, 2009 VEGETATION MAINTENANCE PLAN Maintenance of the restored and enhanced wetland may be required to assure the long- term health and welfare of the wetland's environmental functions. Such maintenance would be identified during the monitoring period and undertaken only following discussion and coordination with King County. The overall objective is to establish undisturbed plant communities that do not require maintenance. Activities may include, but are not limited to, the removal of invasive non-n_ative vegetation and the irrigation of selected areas. Established maintenance activities include the removal of any trash within the wetland or buffer. REMOVAL OF INVASIVE NON-NATIVE VEGETATION As a contingency, should the removal of invasive non-native vegetation become necessary within the restored and enhanced wetland area, the project proponent shall contact King County to establish and define specific actions to be taken. Resultant contingency plan activities shall be implemented when the ongoing vegetation monitoring program indicates that plants listed in the Washington State Noxious Weed List, blackberries, reed canarygrass, or Scot's broom are becoming dominant in the community or exceed 15% of the aerial coverage of the planting areas. SEEDING FOR EXPOSED AREAS Seeding for all exposed surfaces within the mitigation area shall be completed within two weeks following the exposure of the soil. · 10 Evendell-· 04065 FINAL MITIGATION PROGRAM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Wetland Area Soil Moisture Conditions common name scientific name Redtop Aarostis alba Water foxtail A/ooecurus genicu/atus (apply at the rate of 120 pounds per acre) Upland Buffer Area Soil Moisture Conditions common name scientific name Colonial bentorass Agrostis tenuis Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea Perennial rveorass Lolium oerenne Creepino red fescue Festuca rubra (apply at the rate of 120 pounds per acre) CONTINGENCY PLAN percent by weinht 50% 50% percent by weinht 15% 40% 30% 15% As a contingency, should the proposed compensatory mitigation program fail to meet the performance criteria, the project proponent shall undertake required remedial actions. Where plant survival is the failing component, the project proponent shall replant and ensure the success of this second planting which would be held to the same standard of success as measured by threshold criteria and monitoring processes. Where non-native, invasive vegetation exceeds 15% aerial coverage the project proponent shall undertake removal actions. Such removal actions shall be completed using hand tools or pulling the plants by hand to remove the invasive vegetation without disrupting the soil profile. All cut or pulled vegetation shall be removed from the mitigation area and disposed in an approved location. Herbicides shall only be used following approval by King County. All herbicide application shall be completed by a licensed professional. Should additional remedial actions be required, the project proponent shall meet with the King County to establish and define actions to be taken to meet the desired goal of this mitigation program. TEMPORARY IRRIGATION The project proponent shall ensure that a minimum of one (1) inch of water is supplied each week to the compensatory mitigation area between June 1 and October 15 for a least the first two years following initial planting. The calculated _amount of required water shall include both natural rainfall and temporary irrigation. The need for additional years of irrigation shall be determined based on site conditions and overall plant survival. The amount of water supplied to the compensatory mitigation area shall be increased if onsite monitoring defines such a need. 11 Evendell-04065 FINAL MITIGATION PROGRAM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PLANTING NOTES With the exception of the identified grass seed mixtures, all plant materials utilized within the restore and enhanced wetland shall be native to the Puget Sound Region. The onsite biologist shall inspect plant materials to assure the appropriate plant schedule and plant characteristics are met. The project proponent shall warrant that all plants would remain alive and healthy for a period of one year following completion of planting activities. The project proponent shall replace all dead and unhealthy plants with plants of the same specifications. FINANCIAL GUARANTEE Financial guarantee shall be provided for this project consistent with the King County Bond Work Sheet (Appendix B). 12 Evendell-04065 FINAL MITIGATION PROGRAM I I I I FIGURES I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 13 Evendell-04065 FINAL MITIGATION PROGRAM I I I I I ,I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I I • ··· I l}ll~IBD"ii£ii" . . 'Ii" IE Ct!l lNI O 11,,(!j)@l D ES . ' 1't ·~ i S 138TH ST 1&1 ..... . ~ SE 128TH ST ·.~ . 4( . ... fFDgwnre 'II IP'D"ojeic~ Site Vicinity I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REFERENCE LIST Adamus, P.R., E.J. Clairain Jr., R.D. Smith, and R.E. Young. 1987. Wetland Evaluation Technique (WET); Volume II: Methodology, Operational Draft Technical Report Y-87, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Office of Biological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, FWS/OBS-79/31. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. Federal lnteragency Committee for Wetland Delineation. 1989. Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. Cooperative technical publication. 76 pp. plus appendices. Hitchcock, C.L., A. Cronquist. 1977. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press. Seattle, Washington. Reppert, R.T., W. Sigleo, E. Stakhiv, L. Messman, and C. Meyers. 1979. Wetland Values -Concepts and Methods for Wetland Evaluation. Research Report 79-R1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soils Conservation Service. Soils Survey of King County Area Washington, February 1979. Washington State Department of Fisheries, Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization, Volume 1., 1975. 14 Evendell-04065 FINAL MITIGATION PROGRAM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A Beneficial Uses of Plants Proposed for Planting in the Wetland and Buffer 15 Evendell-04065 FINAL MITIGATION PROGRAM ------------------- TREE STRATA BOTANICAL NAME SCIENTIFIC NAil/iE Douglas fir Pseudotsuaa menziesii Western red cedar Thuja plicata Western hemlock Tsuga hete,ophyl/a Sltka'spruce Plcea sltchensis big leaf maple Acer macrophyl/um Oregon ash Fraxinus latlfolia Western paper birch Betu/a nanvrlvera . .cascara Rhamnus aurshiana bitter cherry · Prunus emarulnata Western crabapple o....,:s fusca black hawthome Crataanus doualasli Pacific willow Salix laslandn, BENEFICIAL USES OF PLANTS USED IN WETLAND AND BUFFER RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES INDICATOR PLANTING BENEFICIAL USES STATUS LOCATION FACU buffer Provides escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and food for wildlife. Excellent insect habitat which are prey for wildlife. Important structural habitat component, alive or as a snag. FAC wetland and Provides escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and food for wildlife. Habitat for insects which are buffer prey for wildlife. Important structural habitat component, alive or as a snag. Good along riparian areas. Good soil stabililv value. · FACU buffer Provides escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and food for wildlife. Also habitat for insects which are prey for wildlife. Important structural habitat component, alive or as a snag. Good along riparian . areas . FAC · wetland and Provides escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and food for wildlife. Seed cones drop in fall. Also buffe( habitat for insects which are prey for wildlife. Important structural habitat component, alive or as a snao. Good soil stabililv value. FACU buffer lmportarit structural habitat component; alive or as a snag. Stumps produce dense mass of sprout stems. Seed eaten by many wildlife species. Provides escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and insect habitat Good soil stabililv value. FACW wetland and Female trees produce seeds that are eaten by many species of wildlife.' Provides escape/refuge buffer edge cover, nesting locations, and insect habitat FAC wetland edge Hardy, fast growing. Seeds especially valued by goldfinches, siskins, and juncos. Provides escape/refuge cover, nestino locations, and insect habitat FAC-buffer edge Good soil-binding characteristics and grows well in disturbed sites. Provides escape/refuge cover, . nesting locations, and excellent insect habitat Fruit eaten by wildlife. FACU buffer Provides escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and .insect habitat Fruit eaten by wildlife. Good soil stability value. FACW wetland and Provides escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and insect habitat Fruit eaten by wildlife. Good buffer edoe soil stabilitv value. FAC wetland and Dense crown provides escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and insect habitat Fruit eaten by buffer edge wildlife. Good soil stability value. . FACW+ wetland and Excellent soil-binding characteristics and very effective erosion control. Provides escape/refuge buffer edge cover, nesting locations, and excellent insect habitat Does not produce seed or fruit for use by wildlife. . . ----------------· --- SHRUB AND GROUND COVER STRATA · BOTANICAL NAIIIIE INDICATOR PLANTING BENERCIAL USES SCIENTIFIC NAIIIIE STATUS LOCATION Sitka willow FACW wetland and Fast growing .. Excellent soil-binding characteris_tics arid very effective erosion control. Provides Salix sltchensis buffer edge escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and excellent insect habitat. Does not produce seed or fruit for use by wildlife. . Scouter willow FAC wetland and Fast growing. Excellent soil-binding characteristics and very effective erosion controL Provides Sa/be scouleriana bufferedge · escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and excellent insect habitat Does not produce seed or fruit . for use bv wildlife. red-osier dogwood FACW wetland and Excellent soil-binding characteristics. Attractive multi-stem shrub with or without stems. Excellent Camus stDlon/fera ' buffer edge escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and insect habitat White fruit eaten by wildlife. salmonbeny FAC+ wetland and Good sojl-binding characteristics. Well adapted to disturbed areas. Fruit has high food value for Rubus s,,_.,,,bilis buffer edge wildlife. Nootka rose FAC wetland and Excellent soil-binding characteristics. WeH adapted to disturbed areas. Fruit has high food value Rosa nutlcana buffer edge and are persistent well into winter. peafruit rose FAC wetland and Excellent soil-binding characteristics. Well adapted to disturbed areas. Fruit has high food value Rosa aisocama bufferedge and are persistent well into winter. wild rose FACU buffer and Excellent soil-binding characteristics. Well adapted to disturbed areas: Fruit has high food value Rosa n~mnOCB'""' buffer edge and are persistent well into winter. Pacific ninebar!( FACW-wetland and Excellent soil-binding characteristics. Flowers are attractive to hummingbirds. Provides escape and Phvsocarnus caaltatus bufferedge refuge cover, nesting locations, and insect habitat vine maple FAC-bufferedge Excellent soil-binding characteristics. Multi-stem shrub. Excellent escape/refuge cover, nesting Acer clrcinatum locations, and insect habitat. Winged fruit eaten by wildlife. salal ·' FACU buffer Good soil-binding characteristics and tolerant to poor soils. Produces edible berries used by soine Gaultherla shallon wildlife. Provides excellent ground cover for wildlife escape and refuge. Oregon grape UPL buffer Good soil-binding characteristics. Produces edible berries used by some wildlife. Provides excellent Barberis nervosa ground cover fcir wildlife escape and refuge. · snowberry FACU buffer Excellent soil-binding characteristics. Produces edible berries used by wildlife. Provides escape and · Sonnnhoricamus a/bus refuge cover, nesting locations, and insect habitat black twinbeny FAC+ buffer Good soil-binding characteristics. Produces edible fruit. Flowers are attractive to hummingbirds. Lonicera lnvolucrata Provides escape and refuge cover, nesting locations, and insect habitat Pacific red elderberry FACU buffer Good soil-binding characteristics. Produces edible fruit Flowers are attractive to hummingbirds. Sambucus racemosa Provides escape and refuge cover, nesting locations, and insect habitat. · prickly current FAC+ wetland-and Produces edible fruit Flowers are attractive to hummingbirds. Provides escape and_ refuge cover, Ribas lacustre buffer edge and insect habitat ------------------- BOTANICAL NAIIIIE INDICATOR PLANTING BENEFICIAL USES SCIENTIFIC NAIVlE STATUS LOCATION gooseberry · FAC wetland and Produces edible fruit Flowers are attractive to hummingbirds. Provides escape and refuge cover, Rlbes dlvaricatum buffer ed11e and insect habitat flowering current UPL buffer Produces edible fruit. Flowers are attractive to hummingbirds. Provides escape and refuge cover, Ribes sanguineum and insect habitat hazelnut FACU buffer Excellent soil-binding characteristics. Multi-'stem shrub. Excellent escape/refuge cover, nesting Corvfus comuta locations, and insect habitat Nuts eaten by wildlife. Important small mammal winter stored food. kinnlkinnick FACU-buffer Good soil-binding characteristics. Produces abundant, edible berries used by some wildlife. A hlllos uva-ursi Provides excellent around cover for wildlife esca= and refuae. thin\bleberry FAC-buffer Produces edible fruit Flowers are attractive to hummingbirds. Provides escape and refuge cover, Rubus nanrlflorus and insect habitat ,evergreen huckleberry UPL buffer Good soil-binding characteristics and tolerant to poor soils. Produces edible befries used by some Vacclnlum ovatum wildlife. Provides excellent ground cover for wildlife escape and refuge. oceanspray -buffer Good soil-bihding characteristics and does well on disturbed sites. Multi-stem shrub. Excellent Holodlscus discolor escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and insect habitat. Seeds persist through the winter and are eaten by wildlife .. slough sedge .. OBL wetland Good soil-binding characteristics and does well in disturbed sites. Seeds persist through the winter carax obnu""' and are eaten by wildlife. . small fruited bulrush OBL wetland Good soil-binding characteristics. Seeds eaten by wildlife. Scimus microcamus . common cattail OBL wetland Good soil-binding characteristics and does well in disturbed sites. Stems and seeds are eaten by T""ha latifolia wildlife. Provides escape and refuge cover, nesting sites, and insect habitat. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX B King County Bond Work Sheet 16 Evendell-04065 FINAL MITIGATION PROGRAM -·-· --------·----------- King County ,Department of Development and Environmental Services · 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest · Renton. WA 98055-1219 • Proje~ Name: ~u"'{ Project Number: L9cation: 13.54 13.22 ·'Arbutus menzies/i 14.50 Fraxintis latifo/ia 13.22 $ 23.51 Picea sitchensis * 13.54 $. 24.15 Pinus contorta* 13.54 $ 24.15 Pinus monticola* lne 13.54 $ 24.15 PoDUlus tremuloldes · 24.15 13.54 · $ 23.51. 13.54 13:54 $ 23.51 ·•western red cedar 13.54 $ 23.51 western hemlock 13.54 $ 23.82 BondQuantltlesWorlcsheet.xls Sensitive Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet $ . $ . . ~"\ s ">o!. 'l. $ '10-~ $ - $ - $ . - $ - $ - $ 44.74 't $ i":\''e, -'lb I I $ - $ 44.74 £.1. . $ 1-t 'O -1 b Page 1 6/8/98 N\ ~ -::t-' -:;j----II J <'.) - t' I ·------r -----------· -- Acer circinatum Amelanchler alnlfolla · Berberis aaulfolium Berberis nervosa Camus stolon/Fera 1 13.86 1 13.22 23.51 I \O Z;,S--lO Cory/us comuta . ·•hazelnut 1 13.54 23.51 black hawthorn 1 13.22 23.51 Gaultheria shallon salal 1.89 ! 13.86 Holodiscus discolor 13.54 23.51 1 13.54 22.87 I ?> -iol 1J'lwllllc;;lla ~c;;1i;;.,.;,uv11111.;, .I.OUIIDII 11,,1111 i' 13.54 $ 23.51 -(j""'l Devil's club $ 13.86 $ 24.15 .. ~ . $ 22.87 --::t' $ 23.51 d-ILi I _,,...(... cl) ~ western crabapple I I I $ 13.22 I I $. 23.51 \v Hflg!JIHIL.t.;;, L,lf.;,fUl:11111,1 cascara $ 13.22 ·$ ·-23-.51 -~ Rhododendron macro.e.hy/lum Pacific rhododendron ! 14.19 Ribes bracteosum stink currant . j . I I $ 13.22 $ _ \I $ 13.86 $ -"" ................ .;;,u,iU ...... , .... ,...... , ........ ,, ...... n .... , .. 1u currant. I I $ 13.86 $ -'1 • I .. , ' 1 T I $ 13.54 $ 24.15 $ -~ 1,w~" ""L~""" 1Nootka rose I I I $ 13.54 $ 23.51 $ -r- , _ • --• -'---L---~ ----I I I $ 13.54 $ 22.87 $ -'J'> ! Rubus parviflorus 1 13.54 1 Rubus spectabilis 1 13.22 23.51 ! Salix geyeriana .1 13.22 22.87 1 Salix hookeriana Hooker's willow 1 12.91 22.87. 1 Salix /asiandra Pacific willow 1 13.22 ·22.87 Salix scou/eriana 22.87 I '1.-0 Scouler willow Salix sltchensls: Sitka wlllciw 1 13.22 Sambucus racemosa red elderber 1 13.54 23.51 •Sorbus sltchensls :~ Vacdnium ovatum 1 13.22 23.51 1 13.86 4' t Vaccinium parvlfollum 2.91 15.47 aondQuantltiesWorksheet.xls Sensitive Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet Page 2 6/8/98 ·-· ------------------ carex comosa Carex /ent/cularis Carex /yngbye/ . 1 19:20 Eleocharis acicularis Eleocharis pa/ustris Juncus acumlnatus Juncus art/culatus Juncus effusus · Soft rush Juncus ensifolius bagger leaf rush Pointed rush Hardstem bulrush 23.04 us maritimus Saltmarsh bulrush · us microcarpus Small-fruited bulrus Beckmann/a syz/gachrielAmerlcan slou 3.04 .. Calainagrostts_ canadens/s I Bluejoint. reed Cinna lat/fol/a I Wood reed Tufted hairgrass 1 9.60 Blue·wlldrve 1.36 Festuca ldahoensis Idaho fescue 3.52 Festuca rubra var. rubt lRed fescue 4.79 G/yceria borealis 1.60 Glyceria elata 1.60 Pan/cum occidentale , BondQuantltlesWorksheet.xls Sensitive Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet r .0 Page 3 6/8/98 1 t' I - .52 7.68 $ 2.27 33.28 Aruncus dioicus Goat's beard 33.28 Caltha oa/ustris · Marsh marigold 20.48 Dicentra Formosa Bleedina heart I $ 2.27 $ 122.88 Epl/obium angustlfollum Flreweed $ 61.44 Fragaria chi/oensls Coast strawberrv I $ 2.27 $ 57.60 Geum macrophyl/um . Big-leaf avens I $ 2.27 ! 51~20 $ 1.45 ' $ .2.27 $ 17.92 ! 2.27 143.46 $ 6.72 Lysichlton americanum $ 13.86 Maianthemuni di/atatu $ $ 128.00 I I I I$ $ 26.88 Oenanthe sarmentosa 12.58 , . I $ 44.80 , ' ' ' ... - Osmorhiza chi/oensis $ 44.80 2.27 $ 89.60 13.22 Smi/acina ste/lata 2.27 ! 102.40 Tellima grandiflora 38.40 t' t Tiarella trifoliata Tolmiea menziesli ! 143.46 ! 102.40 ·• Viola g/abe//a --· ::::: . 37.88 3.21 Each 0.51 SY 25.00 HR $ 37.00 .HR $ 55.00 HR $ 95.00 HR $ 0.68 Each $ 10.02. Each $ 16.47 Each ':7 I $ 29.38 Each ,o $ 0.44 SY Slios <willow. red-osier) $ 1.32 Each PLANTS: Stakes (willow) ·i--.$ 0.96 Each Sand, coarse builder's, delivered ·and spread $ 42.06 CT $ 7.00 Each tO $ -r''q \17 $ 605.44 DAY $ -~ ##### ACRE ·--. $ - ##### ACRE $. -~ .$ 0.02 SY -$ -~ 'i,1\- " ..:f::., ,,.,, ,, .... -» ,,, Mm<§,,, ' 0 -' -7,:;,W,-:,.~,-' f« --~ -«..:f$ .,-.~::::t.~«',,,ill> .... i;::% ~'::' ~::-~;W/~"L_ , ... ,' Ins ection, annual Ins ection, final $ 575.00 EACH l Maintenance, semi-annual Maintenance, annual I w reQ~" I Monitoring, annual 5\)C'%1 I t>-~ (> I I I I I 1:-~: 3;62 : MSF: '2.j ,s : Acre -~ f, ' oclllJlllll!t1a--. ------. Root wads· eA #### Each ##### Each 163.00 Each 400.00 Each $ 50.00 Each •! 800.00 1 $ 74.30 CY $ 7.03 CY $ 1.30 CY .$ 1.20 . LF I ''L,.."'t:lt" I I I l l I .. )-<.U.,,._W Jute Mesh I $ 1.26 SY Mulch, by hand, straw, 2" deep: $ 1.27 SY Mulch, by hand, wood chips, 2" deep $ .3.25 SY 0.32 SY ·-. $ <:)\ ··--..,. $ 9.30 LF $ -q:) $ 14.00 LF $ -N CPP, 12" $ 18.00 LF $· -.(5S ed $ 2.00 SY . $ -~ $ 33.98 · CY ##### Each ##### Each ##### .Each 15.57 LF 59.60 LF 5.24 SY 6.48 SY $. .$ 432.00 TON.· $ 35.73 CY ! .. ' 2-rail ttD~ -:f .31-'o,..._- ·-·-----------------iail ~ Cl'li:I C NOTE: All plant prices are from Storm Lake Growers, Wabash Natives, Fourth Corner, and Sound Native Plants (containers); and from Frosty Hollow and Abundant Life (seeds). SUBTOTAL (SUM ALL PAGES): 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: TOTAL: 1L\, ":\''"z>q'¥\ '-f . i.\ ~ 2,\. °0' . i -di [C,., llo\ ~ BoridQuantltlesWorksheet.xls .Sensitive Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet ! ·- ! ! Page 7 6/8/98 f, Denis Law · · Mayor November 1, 2010 · ' ',--, '·-~-·,, ',•¥' Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, _Administrator Soundbuilt Homes, Inc. PO.Box 73790 Puyallup, WA 98373 Subject: Receipt of Fifth Annual Maintenance and Monitoring Report . . . Evendell Wetland Mitigation Project City of Renton File LUA 09-H3 To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to inform you that I have accepted the fifth and final annual maintenance and monitoring report for the Evendellwetland mitigation project along with sypplemental correspondence. Upon evaluation, it appears the project is in compliance with the established performance standards thereby satisfying the 5 year successful monitoring period requirement. I have initiated the paperwork to release the bond originally submitted with King County for the mitigation project, in the amount of $19,162.00. If you have any questions please contact me at (425) 430-7219. . Sincerely, 4~· j Timmoos, "'""" Current Planning Division cc: J.S. Jones and Associates, Biologist Carrie Olson, Engineering Specialist r-·-- i ~a,(}kna.nce.-J -- / Mtn i~v\~ &rd 1 · I (w eJ-lOJLds) Renton City Hall o 1055 South Grady Way o Renton, Washington 98057 o rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Carrie, M E M O R A N D U M November 1, 2010 Carrie Olson Rocale Timmons Release of Assignment of Funds Evendell Mitigation Monitoring City of Renton LUA09-113 Please initiate the paperwork to release, the bond for the mitigation project at Evendell. The amount is for $19,162.00. The release applies to the wetland mitigation maintenance and monitoring. A copy of the paperwork should also go in the yellow file and to the City Clerk's office. Thank you! h :\ced\pla nning\current planning\wetlands\evendell\release of bond.doc 2005/JUL/28/THU Ol:l2 pv Flnmclal Gnaranue;A<ttvlty No. A04BN275 Project No. L01POOI6 NamoofProJed ll:vendell ---------- Locodoll/AddrtsloCPrOJed --=P-=ar'-'cel=l..,4c:2l=,05=9021='------------------ 1'llwldol-.i: ------.,~--...,--~--.---.,-.......,---... ---.-.,,~,.,.-.,~w-------- Applicant_~~~~~~~~~~~~~--,,...~~~~~~~~~~ n,, ohov.....r..-cdBmkbmohy ccrdllel lbattbo sumofs19 l6lpO;, ondcposirv.!th tbo Baakin- Nmnbu'3179400928 · UDCl«tbc:oamoot s:ar Devaloping, I.LC to10CUrOforJCillgC.ouoty the APPUCANT'S ~ of ce:rts:in work. and ccmdiJions required in ccmncctian with 1hc ~ project nm CONDmON OF OBLIGA'IlllN;, that · 1. 'Iba APPUCANThu ~an·~ mtitkd ':§cpdtiyf AmRRftcttltl AIJ'lt'MRl"', ,aipy otwb1c.b 11.rtec:hed hereto end ~-bylhlo'- 2. Vn4tr dmpro~:ottho .ApEmmr, the i,,Pl.ICAN'Ttsreqlltn:d to tomilh a ,uamtoc to SCCUR 1ha APPlJcANTS ~ with Ibo _of ... .___ IT lS_FURTBBR HXPRl!SSL YPROVIDBD that . 1. Tho Blllk hcfellyctrtules ud qnt1 tbtr tbae funlllWlll not be tdel.secl wilhouc wrtm:n imtzucUonl tom an 1.11mariml .,-.t ofKlq County. 'Ihu ~ o!Pund, i! incYDclble IIDd nynot ba bmdnlred or Clllodlcd by !ho APPUCAlff ur lkak b aay mam aa;,t _.,,..,... ___ """"°"""· 2. 1be Bd-,rcci 1h11: th~ tmtds will be paid to KIDS Oinmywidrin 10 da)I ofrcceiviaa; wrlltm ntltacc dlll:xtu, Coobty bm dfflndnlld tb11 nquirmncaU al Iba ~have not bea:J: ~ pe,fllrmaS 'M:l2WI ~I• Ila» HmlQ;"or dm n,quircd fees hive nGl'been paid. 'lbc ~idWJ. haw~ ducyor rf&bt to Mum 1M oorreomea oraw.oprflDDm ofmcb notioeor ~ byXmJ au-,. and lball riot ialcrp1ad or in l!1f m111111Cl" dalay aid paynDt otftmdl to Kma:c.o.mty. My wmpmdo:t !mdl dwl be rc&vmm to 1M APPUCANT --· ... Q,t ..... oftbo-l-'DIii ob~ of dMf Baak. l:lld. APPUCANT mall mt bo cUtchtspd aad. dmll nmda ID e&d bl 1h11 fflBt of uy eslJJnlkm o!lbna ro, tu APPUCA>lt'S-ofCbc--,m of"'l_of ... ...,.._pbm """"' """""""'of""-T),o- bl:n:by wliW:I MID afmysocb f:XblLllorll or~ 4. The AP'PUCANTS ~bliptiop 1o i-farm lbc work ar pay !tel 111d Glbc:r amo\ll'IQ b nae ltmll:cd. to Ibo lmOUDt Dfthil ~ atPwda. ,. I, .............. b)wje<t,-..., .r .. m,oqx,nlod -Kb,geou.ty __ ... rlp!I ............ ....,.,...,....._, of Punch and Ibo ~ wtthmlt nockic to lhc APPUCANT or Biink. BANK'S MAILING ADbllESS: 1102 CRJPJHr~~ Serest -Su1ct 600 Taccnaa, WA 98402 253-779-4215 Piere• · · cYidcnoo tbal ktLD.ach L Cramer (Bank OfflcW) lipod dua he ...i volnnluy tct fm !he"'" and.plllj>C>m mcl>/loDtd m tl>ls 1mttuu,cnc Dated: 7013-05 . . Si~of~o~Public:~~N;,,._ Title: Loan Support officer My appointonm1 e,;pm:o: __ 1_2_-_1-_2_0_01 ______ _ It b tlLI APPLI~S·~piiuiliuJtrW ~1\"itit~~ ~~,:t'i~'~o/'t,~llllji~~iie'Dumbei:~·aup otDWDerdilp or Pros>orlY• U ll tn APPUCANT'S ...,l>ils'iblflQ' to Ufl!'lif tii rtlciti,nmillt~alliY/l~·Dauttfl para'fett·•fter I dllDtt of o«auslllp _ ... ,il'PUCANT: APPUCANT'S M,ULING ADDRESS: - Datod; __________________ _ Signature ofNotacy Publio: ------------ Title: My appo-=bifui=-ont7'-cexp=1ros,,---A-,,-0_4_B-::-N-2-:-:fflc-=, ', .. . . ' . -. Denis Law Mayor September 13, 2010 Department of Community and Economic Development · Alex Pietsch; Administrator Suzanne Anderson OTAK Inc. 10230 NE Points Drive, Suite 400 Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: Wetland Mitigation Monitoring-Evendell (LUAQ9,113} · Dear Ms. Anderson: We would like Otak Inc. to do a secondary review of the submittals for the following wetland mitigation project as this is the last monitoring report (S'h Annual) before the City releases the surety device for the success mitigation project: • Evendell-As a note, the mitigation project was approved by King County and then annexed into the City prior to the completion of the monitoring period. Therefore, the City does not have a complete.file for this project. The following historical correspondence is attached.· o Item to be reviewed: 5th Annual Monitoring Report-submitted on July 13, 2010 o Receipt of the 4th Annual Monitoring Report · o 4th Annual Monitoring Report o F 0 inalMitigation Plan A courtesy copy of all future ccirres'pondence between the City and the applicants will be forwarded on to you: Please forward your comments to my attention for reviewed ·reports as well as invoices for your services. Feel free to contact me ai: (425.) 430-7219 if you have. any qu~stions or if you would like to set up a time for a site visit. Thank you·. ~~~ . ~o41e Timmons · Associate Planner cc: Jennifer Henning/'Pl_anning Manager Soundbuilt Homes, Inc. J.S. Jones and Associcites, Inc. Yellow File Attachments Renton City Hall_ o 1055 South Grady Way o Renton, WashingtOrl 98057 o rentonwa.tjov .J. S . .J o :n es an d. Ass o c i a f e s , I n c. August 28, 2009 Laureen Nicolay Environmental Scientist City of Renton Planning Department 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: Evendell Wetland Mitigation Project Year Four Monitoring King County File No. A04BN275 Dear Ms. Nikoli, J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc. has completed Year Four monitoring for the Evendell Wetland Mitigation project. The initial phase of the project was installed in August of 2005. Supplemental plants were added, as per the Supplemental Mitigation Plan, in October of 2007. The additional 56 plants added are to be monitored as part of the existing project. Monitoring was conducted on August 17, 2009. This is Year Four of the five-year monitoring program Performance Standards Performance Criterion #A I: As defined by plant count, I 00% of the trees and shrubs initially installed within the supplemental compensatory wetland area shall exhibit survival through the end of the first growing season following supplemental planting. Performance Criterion #A2: As defined by plant count, 85% of the trees and shrubs initially installed within the supplemental compensatory wetland area shall exhibit survival through the end of the fifth growing season of the overall project monitoring program. Performance Criterion #A3: As defined by aerial coverage, invasive, non-native species shall not exceed 15% through the end of the fifth growing season of the overall project monitoring period. Methods A total count of plants was conducted and compared to baseline data to provide an accurate account of survival. Results are presented in the table below. 4 0 2 EAST M A I N S T R E E T, S U I T E I I 0 A U B U R N, W A S H I N G T O N 9 8 0 0 2 253-804-2645 I FAX 253-333-8584 ,ndell Monitoring 2009 Vicinity Map SE 1361h St Photopoint Monitoring Diagram Augus12009 2 J. S. Jones and Associa1es, Inc. 1ndell Monitoring 2009 reean ru iuec1es T dSh bS -.. -... . 1~,:· . ·-::<·~·. Ytlt4 Trees Acer circinatum Vine maple 6 5 Crataegus douglasii Black hawthorn 2 2 Fraxinus latifolia Oreaon ash 5 5 Ma/us fusca Western crabapple 17 16 Picea sitchensis Sitka soruce 5 5 Pseudotsuaa menziesii Doualas fir 7 7 Thuja plicata Western red cedar 7 9 Shrubs Cornus stolonifera Red-osier doawood 21 19 Lonicera involucrata Black twinberrv 3 3 Phvsocarpus capitatus Pacific ninebark 11 11 Rosa avmnocaroa Baldhio rose 7 8 Salix sitchensis Sitka willow 26 23 Total: 117 113 Analysis The project is performing up to standards with a 96 percent survival rate and less than 15 percent invasive composition. Volunteers such as red alder (Alnus rubra), western red cedar (Thuja plicata), and salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis) are continuing to establish in the enhancement area. There was no wildlife observed nor was there evidence of wildlife activity. Recommendations We recommend that the following supplemental plants be added, an additional round of maintenance be c onducted , and the project be released from the monitoring period. ---. -1illltlle -.. :') ·"f.<i. ,:¥81a . '··?:= -0-, Shrubs Lonicera involucrata black twinberrv 2 aallon 5 Symphoricarpos a/bus snowberrv 2 aallon 5 If you have any question s or concerns, please contact me at (253 ) 804-2645 or by email at to m @js jonesassociati es.com. Take Care, Thomas Dee Wetland Scientist cc: Steve Browning File Copy Aug usr 2009 3 J. S. Jones and Associates. Inc. • -----------l ,ndell Monitoring 2009 Photopoint 1 Photopoint 2 August 2009 4 J. S. Jones and Associates, In c. Laureen M. Nicolay From: Sent: To: Cc: Jennifer T. Henning Thursday, September 03, 2009 12:13 PM Laureen M. Nicolay Chip Vincent W. · .oet-l lS Subject: RE: Evendell Plat Wetland Mitigation Report for Year 4 of Mitigation Monitoring I would like this assigned to Rocale to look at the wetland report and work with Arnie. Thanks! From: Laureen M. Nicolay Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 11:24 AM To: Jennifer T. Henning Cc: Chip Vincent Subject: Evendell Plat Wetland Mitigation Report for Year 4 of Mitigation Monitoring A wetland monitoring report came in for this plat that was transferred from King County. This plat has not yet been logged into Permits Plus or had a planner assigned. Its apparent status is that it has applied for final plat approval but has not yet been recorded. Who should work with Arneta to finalize the plat and who should review the year 4 wetland report? Thank you, L Laureen Nicolay, Senior Planner City of Renton Development Planning 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-7294 phone (425) 430-7231 fax lnicolay@rentonwa.gov 1 Laureen M. Nicolay From: Sent: To: Cc: Carrie Olson Wednesday, February 04, 2009 4:21 PM Jennifer T. Henning Laureen M. Nicolay Subject: Attachments: FW: Scanned document from Carrie Olson CanoniR5070_6thFI_EDNSP _LDAP _SMTP _02042009-111243.pdf Jennifer: Thought I'd forward this e-mail and attachment to you and Laureen for your information. Steve the next few days. me to release it or Browning from SBI Development, LLC His phone number is 253-377-5221. not. Thanks, Carrie -----Original Message----- From: Carrie Olson Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 11:16 AM To: Browning, Steve Cc: Kenneth Glasby; {Lisa.Brandt@kingcounty.gov) Subject: FW: Scanned document from Carrie Olson -----Original Message----- From: Carrie Olson [mailto:COlson@Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 11:13 AM To: Carrie Olson Subject: Evendell Project will be calling you for a decision in Also, please let me know it you want Hi Steve, I am under the impression that you have requested the release of the Sensitive Area Restoration Assignment of Funds for the Evensdell Project L01P0016, in the amount of $9,581.00. According to the Sensitive Area Restoration Agreement signed SBI Developing LLC on July 12, 2005, this 5-year agreement is not due to be released until July of 2010. Also, please see the attached letter to J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc. Please contact me if you need further discussion. Thanks, Carrie Olson From: Kenneth Glasby Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 9:04 AM To: Carrie Olson Cc: Kayren K. Kittrick Subject: FW: Address Change:A04BN275 Evendell From: Brandt, Lisa [mailto:Lisa.Brandt@kingcounty.gov] Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 9:02 AM To: Kenneth Glasby; Steve Browning Subject: Address Change:A04BN275 Evendell Ken, As I noted in our phone conversation I have been the Critical Area reviewer for the Evendell project held under bond number A04BN275 (red file folder). This project was reviewed and since then final corrective actions have been completed. 1 ,I •Due tb the recent transfer~ iles to the City of Renton unde .. nnexation, it is unlawful •for any KC Staff to review or re-inspect the project. Cn 12/12/08 I received confirmation from Thomas Dee of J.S. Jones Associates, environmental consulting firm, that all corrective work was completed. Based on this confirmation, I suggest the release of the Critical Area Maintenance Bond for the Evendell project. Thank you. Lisa Lisa Brandt · Environmental Scientist Land Use Services, DDES 900 Oakesdale Ave. Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5219 tel: 206-296-6764 fax: 206-296-7051 Lisa.brandt@kingcounty.gov Please note: Fees will be charged at the KC annual rate for staff time associated with all work done in conjunction with compliance review, correspondence, monitoring, and release of financial guarantees. 2 ' . King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov October 30, 2008 J S Jones and Associates, Inc 402 East Main Street Suite 110 Auburn, WA 98002 BlueJayJones@nventure.com RE: A04BN275 Evendell Year 2 Critical Area Mitigation Monitoring Sub: Monitoring Report Review -ia,e..vt .._, ,,.:..r:::, Dear Lance: Thank you for submitting the Year 2 Mitigation Monitoring Report for the Evendell Community. We have accepted the report as the project appears to be on track per the data provided. Following are a few comments regarding this monitoring report and the As-built Report submittal expected for the Supplemental Mitigation Plan (dated Oct. 7, 2007). The Monitoring Report dated Sept. 18, 2007, notes 86% survival of installed native plants with additional volunteer species like red alder and salmonberry. The standard of success requires 80% survival at the end of the monitoring period. The project should be able to maintain the high survival rate with the volunteer species therefore no supplemental planting of this project should be necessary. We concur that invasive species must be maintained due to their aggressive nature through the remainder of the monitoring period. No photographs were submitted with the monitoring report; however we will still accept this report based on notes below. As I discussed with folks from SBI Developing the two projects can be combined into one monitoring event/report. Since this initial project is under a 5-year monitoring period, 2010 would be the final year. When combined the Supplemental Mitigation would be monitored for 3 years to finish at the same time which is an acceptable monitoring period in this situation. JS Jones October 30, 2007 Page 2 Based on the combining of the projects for monitoring we request an As-built Report be submitted (by not later than 4/1/08) when the Supplemental Plan has been installed. Please include photographs which are inclusive of both projects in this submittal and recap the "combined status". This will officially put the two projects on the same monitoring schedule, and after an installation inspection we will be able to reduce the A04BN275 performance bond to a maintenance bond. Please contact me if you are unclear about the combined monitoring period or the As- built Report expected once the Supplemental Plan has been completed. Thank you. Sincerely, Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist DDES, Critical Areas cc Steve Browning, SB! Developing Inc. File copy .-... ti King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov October 30, 2008 J S Jones and Associates, Inc 402 East Main Street Suite 110 Auburn, WA 98002 BlueJayJones@nventure.com RE: Evendell Year 2 Critical Area Mitigation Monitoring Sub: Monitoring Report Review Dear Lance: L+12--. Thank you for submitting the Year 2 Mitigation Monitoring Report for the Evendell Community. We have accepted the report as the project appears to be on track per the data provided. Following are a few comments regarding this monitoring report and the As-built Report submittal expected for the Supplemental Mitigation Plan (dated Oct. 7, 2007). The Monitoring Report dated Sept. 18, 2007, notes 86% survival of installed native plants with additional volunteer species like red alder and salmonberry. The standard of success requires 80% survival at the end of the monitoring period. The project should be able to maintain the high survival rate with the volunteer species therefore no supplemental planting of this project should be necessary. We concur that invasive species must be maintained due to their aggressive nature through the remainder of the monitoring period. No photographs were submitted with the monitoring report; however we will still accept this report based on notes below. As I discussed with folks from SBI Developing the two projects can be combined in the monitoring process. To get them on the same timeline we would consider reviewing the projects for:final monitoring/ bond release at the end of 2009. This would ensure that the Supplemental Mitigation Plan has been installed for 2 years, allowing for adequate demonstration of plant establishment and the original project would be held for a 4th growmg season. JS Jones October 30, 2007 Page 2 Based on the combining of the projects for monitoring we request an As-built Report be submitted (by not later than 4/1/08) when the Supplemental Plan has been installed. Please include photographs which are inclusive of both projects in this submittal and recap the "combined status". This will officially put the two projects on the same monitoring schedule, and after an installation inspection we will be able to reduce the A04BN275 performance bond to a maintenance bond. Please contact me if you are unclear about the combined monitoring period or the As- built Report expected once the Supplemental Plan has been completed. Thank you. Sincerely, Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist DDES, Critical Areas cc Steve Browning, SBI Developing Inc. File copy ... A'i!li.., ==== J". S. J" o n e s a. n d Ass o c i a. t e s , In c. September 18, 2007 Ms. Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist II King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057 RE: Evendell Year 2 Monitoring SE 136~' Street and l60d' SE, King County, Washington King County File No. A04BN275 l-0'( ~1~ Dear Ms. Brandt: ~ --., '( "'--z_ ttf.k.J... 6§1, \ ~I\. f!U-- ~ - ~ IZ.-V,,'>,~ ..,..df ~ ~ p ~-k,"> -7 ~ 12-0 . 1 io\2-A--~l- , ~ · 'l · o l- J S. Jones and Associates, Inc. has reviewed the mitigation planting of the Evendell site. Tree and shrub species were identified and counted to determine survival and the health of the plants was assessed. Recommendations for any necessary measures to bring the Evendell mitigation site into compliance are presented below. Enhancement Area The plants were originally installed per the approved mitigation plan in August of 2005. Additional willows (Salix spp.) were installed in the spring of 2006 to replace the original cuttings that have died. After the second year of growth, the plants appear to be healthy and have an established root system. The installed Pacific ninebark (Physocarpus captitatus) has dted back, however new growth is present at the base of the each plant. Volunteers such as red alder (A/nus rubra) and salmonberry (Rubus Spectabilis) are contining to sprout in the enhancement area. Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), and field morning glory (Convolvulus arvens1s) which 1s well established in the periphery continues to encroach into the enhancement area. Tree and shrub species were counted and compared with the original installed totals in Table 1.0. A total of 53 tree and shrub individuals were counted which is less than the 61 species installed. J 6 7u The monitoring schedule includes a site visit close to the beginning of the growing season for the first two years of monitoring. The installation transpired towards the end of summer of 2005 growing season and the first monitoring site visit did not occur until September 2006. Since the plants are well established, JS. Jones and Associates, Inc. recommends waiving the spring visit requirement for the first 2 years. 402 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 110 A U B U R N, W A S H I N G T O N 9 8 0 0 2 253-804-2645 I FAX 253-333-8584 .. Evendell -Monitoring Table 1.0 Tree and Shrub Snecies COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME INSTALLED QTY. COUNTED QTY Western red cedar Thuia olicata 4 4 Sitka snruce Picea silchensis 2 2 Douolas fir Pseudotsu<7a menziesii 4 4 Western crabann)e Ma/us fusca 12 10 Black twinberrv Lonicera involucrata 3 2 Pacific ninebark Phusocarous caoitatus 6 6 Red-osier doowood Cornus stolonifera 10 10 Sitka willow Salix sitchensis 20 15 Total 61 53 Recommendations for Buffer Enhancement E-2 o Remove all invasive vegetation from the enhancement area o Remove any refuse from the enhancement area Conclusions The Evendell mitigation area that was installed within the mitigation areas is healthy and thriving. Minimal mortality is present. Continued maintenance of invasive vegetation is necessary for the success of the mitigation. If you have any questions regarding this as- built letter, please contact us at 253-804-2645 or by email at robert@jsjonesassociaties.com. s;.cernly, fj e Erickson Environmental Designer cc: Steve Browning, SBI Developing, Inc. File Copy ? .CJ e, ... X. ':}-"7-:::f-'1 (:, &:, l 'Pu ytt r Iv f , i,eJ A-1$ '3':::f'? September 2007 2 J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. Page I of2 Young,Jay From: Young, Jay Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 10:13 AM To: Townsend, Steve Cc: Pray, Jeff Subject: FW: Evendell Pond Hi Steve, My understanding of the meeting we had regarding the side slopes for the Evendell's detention pond in the recreational tract is that side slopes shall not exceed 3(H):l(V). If the pond side slopes are steeper than 3:1 than other mitigation measures might be sufficient in addressing safety concerns and KCC 21A.14.!80. This option would require an SWDM adjustment and a zoning variance. Please confirm if this is an accurate reflection of our meeting. Thanks Jay Young From: dec@coredesigninc.com [mailto:dec@coredesigninc.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 3:47 PM To: Young, Jay Subject: Evendell Pond Jay- I've attached a portion of the KCC related to the Recreation space requirement and a portion of the 1998 KCSWDM related to fencing requirements. Take a look at it and give me a call to discuss. The pond is owned and maintained by the homeowners association. Per the KCSWDM, for a private system, no fencing is required for slope sleeper than 3: 1. So technically, the pond is designed per the manual. I proposed the idea of construction a 4' high chain link fence around the north and east sides of the rec. space area to the client and the contractor. They are open to putting in the fence. We estimated a total of about 150 lineal feet of fencing at the top of the slopes near the rec. space area, which is where the slopes are slightly steeper than 3: 1. Let ine know your thoughts. I know this would be the most practical and safest solution. Thanks for your time. David E. Cayton, P.E. Principal dec@g>J~d_esigninc.com Core Design, Inc. 14711 • NE 29th Place, Suite 101 02/04/2008 • Bellevue WA 98007 Tel: 425.885.7877 Fax: 425.885.7963 www.coredesigninc.com 02/04/2008 Page 2 of2 Brandt, Lisa From: Sent: To: Subject: Carol, Brandt, Lisa Thursday, January 10, 2008 3:55 PM DDES, FGMU A04BN275 Evendell I have approved the Evendell mitigation for bond reduction. However based on supplemental mitigation required this bond is only to be reduced by 50%. Thank you. Lisa Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist Land Use Services, DOES 900 Oakesdale Ave. Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5219 tel: 206-296-6764 fax: 206-296-7051 Please note Email Address change! Lisa.brandt@kinqcounty.gov 1 soc Page 1 of I Ao/..JB ll -Z 1-S" ~~~~d~'. Lisa ___________________________________________________ l::C!:f. t, ~L':L-:7? ___ _ From: Thomas Dee [tom@jsjonesassociates.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 2:22 PM To: Brandt, Lisa Cc: 'Steve Browning' Subject: Evendell Flagging Hi Lisa, I tied orange surveyor flagging on the plants out at Evendell. I attached a photo of the mitigation area. Take Care, Thomas Dee Wetland Scientist J.S.Jones & Associates, Inc. 402 E. Main Street, Suite 110 Auburn, WA 98002 (253) 804-2645 (office) (206) 817-9526 (cell) 01/17/2008 r Brandt, Lisa From: Sent: To: Subject: Tom and Steve, Brandt, Lisa Thursday, January 10, 2008 3:36 PM J Jones; 'Steve Browning' Evendell As-built A04BN275 Thank you for submitting the As-built drawing of the supplemental mitigation at the Evendell project. I have finally been able to review the submittal including the photographs. At this time I will approve the installation of the plantings and the bond reduction without an additional inspection. It appears that the plants were not fiagged per the photographs. I would like them to be flagged while the mulch rings are fresh so that they can be identified during future monitoring. Please notify me when this is complete. We will also expect the combined monitoring report for both portions of the Evendell Mitigation project to be submitted by Oct. 31, 2008. If you have any questions please notify me. Thank you. Lisa Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist Land Use Services, DDES 900 Oakesdale Ave. SouthweSt Renton, WA 98057-5219 tel: 206-296-6764 fax: 206-296-7051 Please note Email Address change! Usa.brandt@kingcounty.gov 1 J". S. J" o n e s a. n d Ass o c i a. f e s , ][ n c. November I, 2007 Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist -Ecologist King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 RE: As-Built for the Evendell Supplemental Mitigation Project King County File Number: A04BN275 lo'-IG,:t1'-13 Dear Ms. Brandt, J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. has completed installation of the Evendell Supplemental Mitigation Project. Plant quantities in the approved plan were to be reduced to a six-foot spacing. The installed quantities are presented in the attached red-lined drawing. The planting area included the access. The original Evendell planting (King County File Nnmber A04BN275) and the supplemental planting will be monitored as one project. If you have any questions, please contact me at 253-804-2645 or by email atjeff@jsjonesassociates.com. Sincerely, Jeffery S. Jones Professional Wetland Scientist cc: Steve Browning File Copy 4 0 2 EAST MA IN STREET, SU IT E I I 0 A U B U R N, W A S H I N G T O N 9 8 0 0 2 253-804-2645 / FAX 253-333-8584 J Evendell Supplemental Planting Photopoint 1 (looking southeast) Photopoint 2 (looking southwest) November 2007 2 J. S. Jones and Associates. Inc. I Evendell Supplemental Planting Photopoint 3 (looking north) Photopoint 1 (original mitigation area looking southeast) November 2007 3 J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. ( Evendell Supplemental Planting Photopoint 2 (original mitigation area looking southwest) Photopoint 3 (original mitigation area looking north) November 2007 4 J. S. Jones and Associales, Inc. • 3.LIS ll30N31\3 . NOI.LV!>I.LIW lV.LN3W3lddOS I Ii I' il ,---, ·,' 1 b •• r :: I . ·-·--·--··"··--·-- Brandt, Lisa From: Sent: To: Subject: Brandt, Lisa Tuesday, October 16, 2007 4:06 PM J Jones; 'Steve@soundbuilthomes.com' RE: Evendell A04BN275 Sorry I forgot to address the bond. The current performance bond is for $19,162. At the time of installation approval of the supplemental plan we can reduce this bond to maintenance at 50% to be held for the 5 year monitoring period (on the entire project). Or the developer can choose to post the second bond for the$ 8,386. If both bonds in full are reduced to 30% then we would hold approx. $1,000 less during the 5 year monitoring period. However I suggest the 50% reduction and just holding one bond, as this is simpler in the big scheme of things. Please review this with them or have them contact me to review the ~ssues in more detail Thank you (__ -A1~b ft>y %ve::.. f-;:,. ' Lisa From: Sent: To: Subject: Brandt, Lisa Tuesday, October 16, 2007 3:48 PM J Jones; 'Steve@soundbuilthomes.com1 Evendell A04BN275 Hello Steve and Lance t<~ e>{_ cu ( ".>="-C vlro. @t ,~- I have reviewed and approved the Supplemental Mitigation Plan dated Oct 7. 2007. The additional wetland enhancement proposed will be expectable with the understanding that a small portion of the enhancement is actually in the buffer. I imagine this is the appropriate area to enhance given the site conditions (dense existing vegetation). The buffer enhancement required due to the impacts will be counted as an exchange for the Tract P previously designated as Critical Area as noted in the Supplemental Plan. I will mail out a copy of the stamped approved drawing and cover sheet of the Supplemental Plan in the next few days. If you have any questions please contact me. Other wise I will look for confirmation when the wetland enhancement has been completed. Thank you. Lisa Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist Land Use Services, DOES 900 Oakesdale Ave. Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5219 tel: 206-296-6764 fax: 206-296-7051 Please note Email Address change! Lisa.brandt@kingcounty.gov 1 Web date: 11/21/2005 ·@King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Rentoo, WA 98055-1219 206-2~ TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Date: Oct07 AppendilC E: Bond Quantity Worksheet for Critical Area Mitigations Project Name: Evendell Supplemental Mitigation Prolect Number: Location: SE 136th Street Contact Name: Address: PLANT MATERIALS: Plant Material prices include labor, ins/a/latton, contractors' marl<Up and sales tax, but don? incluc/e delivery. (128% of wholesale plent pries plus "planting" from page 5.) TREES Scientific Name Common Name Unit Price Qty Unit Price Qty Unit Price Qty Unit Price Qty Total 4" ...... t 1 aallon 2 aallon 5aallon Cost Ables grandls' grand fir IAcer macrophyl/um big leaf mania $ 13.54 $ Alnusrubra ' Red alder $ 13.22 $ !Arbutus menziesli Pacific madrone $ 14.50 $ Betula n,mvrlfera pa=rblrch $ 13.22 $ Frexlnus latifolia Oregon ash $ 13.22 $ 23.51 $ 44.74 5 $ Picea sitchsnsfs• Sitka spruce $ 13.54 $ 24.15 $ 44.74 5 $ Plnus contorta• Shore, Ina $ 13.54 $ 24.15 $ Plnus monUcola' Western white c Ina $ 13.54 $ 24.15 $ Popu/us tromuloldes auaklng as=n $ 24.15 $ Populus lrlchocarpa black cottonwood $ 13.54 $ 23.51 $ Prunus emarginata bitter cherrv $ 13.54 $ Psaudotsuga maiizies/1' Doualas fir $ 13.54 $ 23.51 $ 44.74 10 $ Taxus brevifol/a• Pacific yew $ Thu/a p/icata• western red cedar $ 13.54 $ 23.51 $ 44.74 7 $ Tsuga helerophylla' western hemlock $ 13.54 $ 23.82 $ 44.74 $ All plant prices are from Fourth Comer Nurseries, Sound NaUve Plants, storm Lake Growers, and Wabash NaUves (containers); and Abundant Ufe and Frosly Hollow !seeds). . - - - 223.70 223.70 - - - - - 447.40 - 313.18 - ~Boodw....-Critical Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet ls-wks-sensureaBQ.pdU11-21-2005 Page 1 of7 August8, 1998 Web date: 11/21/2005 SHRUBS Unit Prtce Unit Prtce Unit Prtce Total Scienfiflc Name Common Name 4" not Ohl 1 oallon Qhl 2oallon Qhl Other Qhl Coat Acer circinatum vine mac le $ 13.54 $ 23.51 9 $ 211.59 Amelsnch/er alnifolla servlcebeny $ 13.54 $ 23.82 $ . Barberis aauifo/lum tall Oregon grape $ 24.15 $ . Berberls nervosa short Oregon nrape $ 13.86 $ . Camus stolon/fera red-osier dogwood $ 13.22 $ 23.51 12 $ 282.12 Cory/us cornuta hazelnut $ 13.54 $ 23.51 $ . Crataegus doug/asii black hawthorn $ 13.22 $ 23.51 6 $ 141.06 Gaultharla shallon salal $ 1.89 $ 13.86 , $ . Ho/odlscus discolor ocean ~ray $ 13.54 $ 23.51 $ . Lonicera lnvoluaata black twinberTV $ 13.54 $ 22.87 15 $ 343.05 Myr/ca gale sweetgale $ . Oemlerla ceraslformis Indian ~lum $ 13.54 $ 23.51 $ . Oplo=nax horrldus Devil's club $ 13.86 $ 24.16 $ . Phlladelohuslewisli mock orange $ 13.54 $ 22.87 $ . Physocarpus caollalus Pacific nlnebark $ 13.22 $ 23.51 20 $ 470.20 Prunus virainiana choke cheny $ . Pyrusfusca western crabannle $ 13.22 $ 23.51 10 $ 235.10 Rhamnus purshlana cascara $ 13.22 $ 23.51 $ . Rhododendron macro"'•Aluin Pacific rhododendron $ 14.19 $ . Ribas bractaosum stink currant $ 13.22 $ . Ribas /acuslre prick.Iv currant $ 13.86 $ . Rlbes sanguineum red-flowering currant $ 13.86 s . Rosa gymnoc::irrm' . Wood rose $ .13.54 $ 24.15 8 $ 193.20 Ross nutkana Nootka rose $ 13.54 $ 23.51 $ . Ross o/socarpa clustered rose $ 13.54 $ 22.87 $ . Rubus leucodermis black raspberrv s . Rubus parvff/orus thimblebe= $ 13.54 $ . Rubus soectab/1/s salmonberry $ 13.22 $ 23.51 $ . Salix aayeriana Geyer willow $ 13.22 $ 22.87 $ . Salix hooker/ans Hooker's willow $ 12.91 $ 22.87 $ . Salix laslandra Pacific'h'illow $ 13.22 $ 22.87 $ . Salix scoularlana Scouler willow $ . Sa/Ix sltchensls Sitka willow $ 13.22 $ 22.87 21 $ 480.27 Sambucus racemosa red elderbeny s 13.54 $ 23.51 $ . Serbus sitchensls Cascade mountain ash $ . 5Ymphorlcarpos a/bus snowberry I $ 13.22 $ 23.51 $ . Vaccinlum ovatum everareen huckleberrv $ 13.86 . $ . Vaccln/um parvlfolium red huckleberTV 1$ 2.91 $ 15.47 $ . KlngBondW-i-t Critical Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet ls-wke-sensereaBO.pdf/11-21-2005 Page2of7 August:8, 1998 Web date: 11/21/2005 Sedaes and Rushes Scientific Name Common Name Unit Price Qtv Unit Price Qtv Unit Price Qty Qty Total 4• ...... t Seeds/oz. 2 aallon Other Cost Carex comosa BrisUvsedae $ 1.32 $ - Carex lenticularis Shore sedae $ 1.32 $ - Carox lvngbvei Lynabv sedae $ 1.32 $ - Carex obnupta Slouch sedge $ 1.32 $ 19.20 $ - Carox roslrata (ulricu/atal Beaked sedge $ 1.32 $ - Carex stipata Sawbeak sedge $ 1.32 $ - E/eocharis acicu/srls Spikerush $ - EJeocharis ru,/us/ris Common Sdkerush $ 1.32 $ - Juncus scumlnatus Tape red rush $ 1.32 ' $ - Juncus articulatus Jointed rush $ - Juncus effilsus(var. paclicus, graciJis native b PIM? Seit rush $ 1.32 $ - Juncus ens/fol/us Dagger leaf rush $ 1.32 $ - Juncus oxymeris Pointed rush $ 1.06 $ - Scirpus acutus Hardslem bulrush $ 1.32 $ 23.04 $ - Scirpus maritimus Salbnarsh bulrush $ 1.32 $ - Scirpus miaocarDus Small-fruited bulrush $ 1.32 $ - Grasses Scientific Name Corilmon Name Unit Price Qty Unit Price Qtv Unit Price Qty Qty Total 4" not Seeds/oz. 2oallon Cost OJopecurus a_.,us/is. Short-awn foxtail $ - Alopecurus aen/culatus Water foxtail $ 1.00 $ - Beckmann/a syzlpachne American sloughgra~• $ 1.20 $ 3.04 $ - catamagrostJs canadensls Blueloint reedgrass $ - Cinna latifo/ia Woodreed $ - Deschamps/a caeSDitosa Tufted halrgrass $ 1.06 $ 9.60 $ - EJymus alaucus Blue wildrye $ 1.36 $ - Feslucs ldahoens/s Idaho fescue $ 3.52 $ - Festucs rubra var. rubra Red fescue $ 4.79 $ - G/vcerla borealis /occ/dentalisl Northern mannagrass $ 1.60 $ - Glycerla e/ata Tall mannagrass $ 1.45 $ 1.60 $ - Pan/cum occldentale Western oanlc-grass $ - Fems Scientific Name Common Name Unit Price Qtv Unit Price Qty Unit Price Qty Qty Total 4" l'V\t 1 aallon 2 aallon Cost Athyr/um fillx..fem/na lady fem $ 13.86 $ - 8/echnum .on/cent deer fem $ 13.86 $ - lr>rvnnteris exn::1nsa shield fem $ 13.54 $ - Po/vstlchum mun/tum western sword fem $ 13.86 $ - Plarldlum squ//lnium bracken $ - King Bond WOltcat-i Critical Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet ls-wks-sensareaBQ.pdU11-21-2005 Page 3 of 7 August 8, 1008 Web date: 11/21/2005 Herbs and Groundcovers Scientific Name Common Name Unit Price Qt, Unit Price Qty Unit Price Qty Qty Total 4• nnt 1 oallon Seeds/oz. Cost Ach/1/ea millefo/ium Yarrow $ 11.52 $ - Anapha/ls margarilacaa Pearly everlasting $ 7.68 $ - IArcloslanhytos uva-<1rsl Kinnlklnnick $ 2.27 $ 33.28 , $ - Aruncus dioicus Goat's beard $ 13.54 $ 33.28 $ - Ca/Iha oa/uslrls Marsh marlaold $ 14.19 $ 20.48 $ - Dicenlra formosa Bleeding heart $ 2.27 $ 13.22 $ 122.88 $ - Epiloblum angus//fo/ium Fireweed $ 61.44 $ - Fragaria chiloensis Coast strawberry $ 2.27 $ 57.60 $ - Geum macronhyf/um Big-leaf avens $ 2.27 $ 51.20 $ - Hersc/eum /anatum Cow parsnip $ 1.45 $ - Hydrophvlfum tenu/,.,.s Paclflc waterleaf $ 2.27 $ 17.92 $ - Linnaea bores/ls Twlnflower $ 2.27 $ 143.46 $ - . Lup/nus po/yphyllus Big-leaf lut ine $ 6.72 $ - Lysichiton americanum Skunk cabbage $ 13.86 $ - Maianthemum dilatatum Wild lily of the valley $ 2.27 $ - Mimulus gutta/us Yellow monkey flower $ 2.27 $ 128.00 $ - Myosotis /axa Small forget-me-<1ot $ 26.88 $ - Oenanthe sarmentosa Water Parsley $ 12.58 $ 44.80 $ - Osmorhlza ch/loens/s · Sweet clcely $ 44.80 $ - Oxalls oreaana Wood-sorrel $ 2.27 $ 89.60 $ - Petasiles frigidus Coltsfoot $ 13.22 $ - Po/vaonum persicaria Lady's thumb $ - Polenlllls frul/cosa Bush potentilla $ - Sml/aclna slel/ala Solomon's Star $ 2.27 $ - Stachys coo/evse Greal betony $ 102.40 $ - Tel/Ima grand/nora Frinaecuc $ 38.40 $ - T/arella trlfoliata Foamflower $ 143.46 $ - To/mies menziesi/ Piggy-back plant $ 2.27 $ 102.40 $ - Viola glabella Stream violet $ 2.27 $ - King Bond Worbheel Critical Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet b-wk&-een&areaBQ.pdf/11-21-2005 Pege4of7 Auguste, 1998 Web date: 11/21/2005 INSTALLATION '"OST$ I LABOR. E'-UIPMENT. OVERHEAD & PROFIT\ T""" Unit Price Unit Quantitv Total Compos~ vegetable, delivered and spread $ 37.88 CY $ - Decompactlng till/hardpan, medium, toe· deoth $ 1.57 CY $ - Decompacting till/hardpan, medium, to 12" deoth $ 1.57 CY $ - Fertilize, slow release tablets, 30gm/tree $ 3.21 Each $ - Hvnroseedlng $ 0.51 SY $ - Labor, aeneral flandscaplngl $ 25.00 HR $ - Labor, general (construction\ · $ 37.00 HR $ - Labor: Consultant, supervising $ 55.00 HR $ - Labor: Consultant, on-site re-design $ Q5.00 HR $ - PLANTS: Potted, 4" diameter, medium $ 0.68 Each $ - PLANTS: Container, 1 aallon, medium soil $ 10.02 Each $ - PLANTS: Container, 2 gallon, medium soil $ 16.47 Each g1 $ 1 4QB.77 PLANTS: Container, 5 gallon, medium soil $ 29.38 Each 37 $ 1,087.06 PLANTS: Seedlna, bv hand $ 0.44 SY $ - PLANTS: su~, /willow, red-oslerl $ 1.32 Each $ - PLANTS: Stakes /willowl $ 0.00 Each $ - Rental of decompactlng machinerv & O""rator $ 70.65 Hour $ - Sand, coarse builder's, delivered and spread $ 42.06 CY $ - Stakina material (sefoer. tree\ $ 7.00 Each 43 $ 301.00 Surveying, line & grade ' $ 605.44 DAY $ - Surveying, lot location & lines $ 1,353.60 ACRE $ - Surveylna, tonnnraohlcal $ 2 160.00 ACRE $ - TIiiing topsoil, disk harrow, 20hp tra-. 4"-6" deep $ 1.02 SY $ - OTHERCnSTS THROUGHOUT MONITORING PERIOD Tvoe Unit Price Unit Quantitv Total Inspection, annual $ 460.00 EACH $ - Inspection, final $ 575.00 EACH \ $ - Maintenance, semi-annual " \, $ - Maintenance, annual c¥' 'i I\ \-" $ - Monltorlna, annual ,..UJJ--\ ·1-$ - Watering, 1" of water, 50" soaker hose $ 3.62 MSF ' ~l ' ,~-$ - lrrlaatlon -temoorarv $ 2 000.00 Acre L ..... y $ - lrrlaatlon -buried $ 4,500.00 Acre " $ - King Bond Wort<a'-1 Critical Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet IB-wk9-aensarea.pdf/11-21-2005 Page 6 of 7 August 8, 1998 Web elate: 11/21/2005 HABIT AT STRUCTURE,.. 11nc1udes de11va-·' ITEMS I Unit Cost Unit Quantitv Total Fasclnes (willow) Each $ - Logs, (cedar), w/ root wads, 16"-24" diam., 40' long $ 1,000.00 Each $ - Logs (cedar) w/o root wads, 16"-24" diam .. 40' $ 400.00 Each $ - Logs, w/o root wads. 16"-24• diam., 40' long $ 245.00 Each $ - Logs w/ root wads. 16"-24" diam., 40' long $ 460.00 Each $ - Rocks.one-man $ 60.00 Each $ - Rocks, two-man $ 85.00 Each ' '$ - Root wads $ 163.00 Each ' $ - Spawning aravel, tvne A $ 22.00 CY $ - Weir-log $ 1,500.00 Each $ - Weir -adjustable $ 2,000.00 Each $ - Woodv debris, large $ 163.00 Each $ . Snaas -anchored $ 400.00 Each $ - Snags -on site $ 50.00 Each $ - Snags -imported $ 800.00 Each $ - EROSION CONTROL ITEMS Unit Cost Unit Quantity Total Backfill and CompacUon-<>mbankment $ 4.80 CY $ - Crushed surfacing, 1 1/4" minus $ 74.30 CY $ - Ditching $ 7.03 CY $ - Excavation, bulk $ 1.30 CY $ - Fence, slit ' $ 1.20 LF $ - Jute Mesh ' $ 1.26 SY $ - Mulch, by hand, straw, 2" deeo $ 1.27 SY $ - Mulch, bv hand, wood chips, 2" deeo $ 3.25 SY $ - Mulch, by machine, straw, 1" deep $ 0.32 SY $ - Plplna, lemooraru, CPP, 6" $ 0.30 LF $ - Piping, lemporarv, CPP, 8" $ 14.00 LF $ - Piping, temoorarv, CPP, 12" $ 18.00 LF $ - Plastic covering, 8mm Uilck. sandbagged $ 2.00 SY $ - RIP Rap, machine placed, slones $ 33.08 CY $ - Rock Constr. Entrance 1OO'x15'x1' $ 2,546.66 Each $ - Rock Constr. Entrance 50'x15'x1' $ 1,273.34 Each $ - Sediment pond riser assemblv $ 1,695.11 Each $ . Sediment trao, 5' high benm $ 15.57 LF $ - Sediment trap, 5' high berm w/splllway incl. rlprap $ 50.60 LF $ - Soddlna, 1" deep, level around $ 5.24 SY $ - Sodding, 1" deeo, sloped ground $ 6.48 SY $ - Straw bales, place and remove $ 432.00 TON $ - Topsoil, delivered and soread $ 35.73 CY $ - ""'9BondWorl<BM« Critical Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet ~BQ.pd811·21-2005 Page6of7 August6, 1006 Web date: 11/21/2005 . GENERAL ITEMS Unit Cost Unit Quantllv Total Fencing, chain link, 6' high $ 1s.ag LF $ . Fencina, chain link, comer costs $ 111.17 Each $ . Fencing, chain link, gale $ 277.63 Each $ . Fencina. •nil! rail, 3' hlnh (2-ralll $ 10.54 LF $ . Fencing, lemoorarv (NGPEl $ 1.20 LF $ . Slans, critical area boundarv $ 2.50 Each $ . STEEP SLOPE/SLOPE INSTABILITY , WRITE-IN ITEMS OTHER NOTE: All plant prices are from Storm Lake Growers, Wabash Natives, Fourth Comer, and Sound Native Plants (containers); and from Frosty Hollow and Abundant L~e Krc1BondWorl<aheet (seeds). SUBTOTAL (SUM ALL PAGES): 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: TOTAL: $ 6,451.40 $ 1,Q35.42 $ 8,386.82 Critical Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet l&-wka-8ensaraaBQ.pdU11-21-2005 Page 7of7 AugustB, 1998 Brandt, Lisa From: Sent: To: Subject: Hello Steve and Lance Brandt, Lisa Tuesday, October 16, 2007 3:48 PM J Jones; 'Steve@soundbuilthomes.com' Evendell A04BN275 I have reviewed and approved the Supplemental Mitigation Plan dated Oct 7. 2007. The additional wetland enhancement proposed will be expectable with the understanding that a small portion of the enhancement is actually in the buffer. I imagine this is the appropriate area to enhance given the site conditions (dense existing vegetation). The buffer enhancement required due to the impacts will be counted as an exchange for the Tract P previously designated as Critical Area as noted in the Supplemental Plan. v6i11 mail· out a cop/J-;;~~Eei~2~!;~ ~__r_a~i~?:a_~crc~~r~sti~_e:?:1h1:·~~pp!e;e;t:1.~1a0Jn:th~-~e~;~:::_·~ . -~~ If you have any questions please contact me. Other wise I will look for confirmation when the wetland enhancement has __ , been completed. Thank you. Lisa Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist Land Use Services, ODES 900 Oakesdale Ave. Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5219 tel: 206-296-6764 fax: 206-296-7051 Please note Email Address change! Lisa.brandt@kingcounty.gov ~ffov,,>c-vQ .,J~ Yg\u,-y 1 IJ)t,(/ !Yo€-I""? 4.-._ 1 • HABITAT ~CHNOlOGIES October 7, 2007 Mr. Kurt Wilson, Project Manager @ SBI DEVELOPING, LLC. P.O. Box 73790 Puyallup, Washington 98373 RE: Supplemental Mitigation Program -SE 135th Street Corridor. Evendell Residential Community SE 136TH Street and 160TH Avenue SE, King County Dear Mr. Wilson, Initial development planning for the Evendell Residential Community focused on . avoidance of adverse impacts to a King County Class 2 Wetland and its associated buffer identified within the northeastern portion of the project site. However, as a part of final project review and permitting King County identified that SE 136th Street needed to be constructed along the entire northern boundary of the project site. The . development of this public roadway required the unavoidable filling of the northern tip of the onsite Class 2 Wetland -a filling of 225 square feet. No other impacts to the onsite wetland were required by this roadway development. The compensatory mitigation program identified for this unavoidable impact was designed to restore a minimum of 550 square feet along the northern edge of the onsite Class 2 Wetland. This mitigation program would restore and enhance an existing degraded wetland area at a ratio of 2.0 to 1.0 (restored/enhanced wetland to impacted wetland). In addition, additional area outside the standard buffer would be added to the overall established buffer to compensate for the impacts to the buffer along the northern edge of the onsite Class 2 Wetland. The compensatory mitigation program was . designed to ensure that required development of SE 136th Street does not result in a net loss of wetland functions or value, or that onsite development does not adversely impact the aquatic habitats within the retained areas. As a part of the development of the SE 136th Street the compensatory mitigation program outlined in the May 27, 2004 mitigation document has been implemented. However, as a part of the development of the SE 136th Street the southern slope of this roadway was required to encroach an additional 10 feet into the identified Class 2 Wetland and associated buffer. This additional impact was associated with the requirement to have a sloped shoulder for the placement of required utilities rather than the originally planned rock wall with no shoulder located at the edge of the roadway. The required placement of utilities within a 10-foot wide area along the southern boundary of SE 136th Street has resulted in an additional 604 square feet of wetland impact and an associated 1,185 square of buffer impact. The following supplemental 1 wetlands, streams, fisheries, wildlife -mitigation and permitting solutiOn!104Qss . P.O. Box 1088, Puyallup, WashingtO§IJ\Spi'..l:MENTAL PROGRAM voice 253-845-5119 fax 253-841-1942 habitattech@qwest.net mitigation program is pre, 1ted to addre.ss these additiona .,pacts and to continue to ensure that required development of SE 136th Street does not result in a net loss of wetland functions or value, or that onsite development does not adversely impact the aquatic habitats within the retained areas. SUPPLEMENTAL MITIGATION ACTION The selected action for the Evendell Residential Community is for the development o1 a residential community consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan and the approved preliminary plat. As a primary part of the planning of this selected action the project team has avoided all impacts to the identified onsite wetland and has established a buffer of 50 feet in width consistent with the King County Environmentally Sensitive Areas Ordinance 21A.24. However, as a part of this residential development King County required that SE 136th Street be constructed to County roadway standard along the northern boundary of the project site. As such, the subsequent development of this roadway required the unavoidable filling of 225 square feet of the very northern tip of the identified onsite Class 2 Wetland. As discussed with King.County environmental staff compensatory mitigation for this unavoidable wetland fill would be provided through the restoration and enhancement of the northern portion of the onsite wetland. The selected area for wetland restoration and enhancement had been impacted by prior land use actions, exhibited a limited plant community, and would be a minimum of 550 square feet in size (see attachment). Implementation of the initial compensatory mitigation program has been completed and the associated "year-one" monitoring is presently underway during the 2007-growing season. The selected action would also fence the outer boundary of the established wetland buffer and attach standard King County buffer boundary signs at a 50-foot interval along the protective fencing. In addition, the selected action would include a five-year monitoring program to ensure the success of the wetland restoration and enhancement plan. For purposes of Section 404 permitting administered by the Seattle District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers the initial development of SE 136th Street resulted in the adverse impact to 225 square feet (0.005 acres) of presently low functional value wetland. This wetland does not provide critical habitats for species listed pursuant to the Endangered Specie Act. · The required placement of utilities within a 10-footwide area along the southern boundary of SE 136th Street has resulted in an additional 604 square feet of wetland impact and an associated 1,185 square feet of buffer impact. As discussed onsite with King County Environmental Staff compensatory mitigation for this unavoidable wetland 2 04065 SUPPLEMENTAL PROGRAM . , and buffer impact shall bl .·ovided in a manner consistent :h the original compensatory mitigation program. The overall goal is to continue to ensure that required development of SE 136u, Street does not result in a net loss of wetland functions or value, or that onsite development does not adversely impact the aquatic habitats within the retained areas. INITIAL ACTION The development of SE 136'" Street resulted In the unavoidable filling of 225 square feet of existing wetland. Compensatory action for this unavoidable fill has been provided through the restoration of enhancement of 550 square feet of existing wetland through the planting of native trees and shrubs. The compensatory mitigation ratio was 2.0 to 1.0 (restored to impacted). The standard wetland buffer area was expanded to the northeast and made into protected Tract P to compensate for buffer area loss. The outer boundary of this wetland would be established, fences, and posted with King County buffer boundarv sians. SUPPLEMENTAL ACTION The subsequent development of a utility corridor along SE 1361h Street resulted in the unavoidable filling of an additional 604 square feet of existing wetland. Compensatory action for this unavoidable fill shall be provided through the restoration of enhancement of 1,208 square feet of existing wetland through the planting .of native trees and shrubs. The compensatory mitigatlor;l ratio was 2.0 to 1.0 (restored to impacted). There is adequate area within Tract P to compensate for the required buffer loss along SE 1361h Street. o Selected Supplemental Mitigation Area The selected supplemental mitigation area is located along the north-central western boundary of the onsite Class 2 Wetland .. This portion of the wetland and adjacent buffer had been impacted by prior land use actions which had included tree removal, pasture management, and pasture utilization actions. When initially delineated this portion of the wetland and adjacent buffer was dominated by a variety of grasses, herbs, and establishing shrubs. Since the initial delineation this portion of the wetland and adjacent buffer has become dominated by an overstory sapling red alder (A/nus rubra). In addition, the buffer area has become dominated by invasive blackberry (Rubus spp.). 3 04065 SUPPLEMENTAL PROGRAM o Mitigation Benefi The restoration and enhancement of the north-central western portion of the existing Class 2 Wetland is designed to accompany the initial mitigation program. The primary benefits associated with the proposed supplemental program includes the creation of a viable plant community composed of native shrubs and trees within an area that had been impacted py prior land use action. The selected plant species would increase plant community and wildlife habitat diversity and complexity within the wetland area (Appendix A). The restored and enhanced wetland area would provide increased screening protections for the wetland area adjacent with the new homesites. In addition, the establishment Tract P to the overall established buffer has provided increased protection for the onsite wetland and additional retained wildlife habitats. DESCRIPTION OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL MITIGATION PROGRAM 1. As compensation for the unavoidable filling of 604 square feet (0.013 acres) of identified King County Class 2 Wetland a selected area along the north-central western boundary of the onsite wetland shall be restored and enhanced through the initial removal of invasive shrubs (i.e. blackberries and Scots broom) and the trimming of sapling red alders. The selected supplemental mitigation area and the travel corridor to the mitigation area shall be clearly flagged onsite by the project biologist. During the onsite marking of the project area the project biologist shall also clearly mark existing desirable vegetation to.be retained. 2. Invasive species and sapling red alder removal actions shall be completed without adverse impact to the soil profile and without adverse impact to existing desirable plant species. All blackberries and Scots broom and no more than 50% of the existing sapling red alder shall be removed from the supplemental mitigation area. In addition, all existing garbage shall also be removed from the supplemental mitigation area. 3. Following invasive species removal the supplemental mitigation area shall be planted with a variety of native trees and shrubs. The area to be restored shall be a minimum of 1,208 square feet (0.027 acres) in size. The selected species shall increase plant community and wildlife habitats diversity and complexity (see attachment). 4. Compensation area for th~ reduced buffer caused by the development of utility corridor SE 136th Street ( a total of 1, 185 square feet) has already been provided within the establishment of Tract P. In addition, the buffer area immediately adjacent to the restored wetland area shall be planted with a variety of native trees and shrubs (see attachment). 5. All onsite actions shall be completed at the direction of the project biologist. 4 04065 SUPPLEMENTAL PROGRAM , 6. Following the comple .n of the supplemental planting ~ .ivities a "record-drawing" plan and implementation letter shall be prepared and submitted to King County. The "record drawing" and implementation letter shall be included within the'present five• , year monitoring program already underway for the initial compensatory mitigation actions. GOAL AND OBJECTIVE OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL MITIGATION PROGRAM The GOAL of the supplemental mitigation program is to fully compensate for the unavoidable adverse impact to Wetland A caused by the required development ofa utility corridor along the southern side of SE 136th Street. The restoration and enhancement of a portion of the onsite wetland shall provide full compensation for unavoidable wetland impacts. Upon the completion of this mitigation plan there shall be no net loss of wetland functions or values. To achieve the defined GOAL, the following OBJECTIVES and PERFORMANCE CRITERIA have are defined: Objective A. The restored and enhanced supplemental mitigation area shall be a minimum of 1,208 square feet (0.027 acres) in total size. The restored and enhanced supplemental mitigation wetland area shall exhibit a scrub/shrub and sapling tree vegetation classes within five years following initial planting. Performance Criterion #A 1: As defined by plant count 100% of the trees and shrubs initially installed within the supplemental compensatory wetland area shall exhibit survival through the end of the first growing season following supplemental planting. Performance Criterion #A2: As defined by plant count 80% of the trees and shrubs initially installed within the supplemental compensatory wetland area shall exhibit survival through the end of the fifth growing season of the overall project monitoring program. Performance Criterion #A3: As defined by aerial coverage, invasive non-native species shall not exceed 15% through the end of the fifth growing season of the overall project monitoring program. SELECTED PLANT COMMUNITIES The plants selected for the supplemental rriitigati9n area shall be obtained as nursery stock. These selected species are native and commonly occur in the local area. The plant species prescribed are selected to increase plant diversity, match present onsite communities, increase wildlife habitats, and enhance the aquatic environment (Appendix A). 5 04065 SUPPLEMENTAL PROGRAM NUMBER COMllh ... o'I! NAME PROPOSED ,ROPOSED INDICATOR SCIENTIFIC NAME SPACING SIZE STATUS loc\ 7 Western red cedar (THP) 10 ft 4 ft height FAC Thuia olicata minimum 5 Sitka spruce (PIS) 10 ft 4 ft height FAC Picea sitchensis minimum 10 Douglas fir (PSM) 10 ft 4 ft height FACU Pseudotsuaa menziesii minimum 5 Oregon ash (FRL) 8 ft 4 ft height FACW Fraxinus /atifolia minimum 10 Western crabapple (PYF) 8 ft 4 ft height FACW Pyrus fusca minimum 6 Black hawthorne (CRD) 4 ft 2gal FAC Crataeaus doua/asii 9 Vine maple (ACC) 4ft 2 gal FAC- Acer circinatum 15 Black twinberry (LOI) 4ft 2gal FAC+ Lonicera involucrata 8 Wild rose (ROG) 4 ft 2 gal FACU Rosa avmnocaroa 20 Pacific ninebark (PHC) 4ft 2 gal . FACW- Phvsocarous caoitatus 12 Red osier dogwood (COS) 4 ft 2gal FACW Cornus stolonifera 21 Sitka willow (SAS) 4 ft 2gal FACW Salix sitchensis IMPLEMENTATION INSPECTION Essential to the success of the supplemental mitigation program is the accurate inspection of onsite activities immediately prior to and during the initial wetland restoration and enhancement phase. These activities include pre-implementation site inspection, the onsite identification of desirable plants to be retained, the onsite identification of the invasive shrubs and sapling red alder to be removed, onsite inspection and technical direction during planting activities, and post-planting site inspection and evaluation. The pre-implementation site inspection allows the project team and the project biologist to evaluate and, if necessary, undertaken minor adjustments in the onsite implementation steps. These steps include analysis of project site elevation features, project sequencing and timing, final grade analysis, unforeseen required minor modifications to the supplemental, and the establishment of environmental protections 6 04065 SUPPLEMENTAL PROGRAM (silt fences, etc.) requirel Jring implementation. Onsite t ... 1nical inspection during supplemental implementation and planting activities shall be implemented by the project biologist. The project biologist shall perform supplemental mitigation program oversight and address minor unforeseen implementation difficulties to assure that the intent of the supplemental compensatory mitigation program is met. The project biolpgist shall also be responsible for ensuring that the species and sizes of native plants selected and noted within the final planting plan are utilized during implementation. If selected native species become unavailable, the project biologist shall consult with King County for substitute plant species to assure that the intent of the compensatory mitigation program is met. Post-implementation site inspection/ evaluation shall include the preparation of a "record-drawing" and associated implementation letter report which shall be submitted to King County. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE PROJECT TASK TASK SCHEDULE Onsite ore-imolementation oroiect meetina Comnleted bv October 30, 2007 Final marking and identification of work area. Completed by November 10, 2007 Plantina of suoolemental wetland area. Completed bv November 25, 2007 Record-drawing and letter report to Countv Comoleted bv December 15, 2007 Should this supplemental implementation not following the time period noted above the project team shall coordinate a revised schedule with King County. PROJECT MONITORING Following the successful completion of the supplemental wetland planting onsite monitoring and evaluation program shall be coupled with the existing five-year monitoring program presently underway for the initial mitigation program. The purpose of this program is to ensure the success of the selected mitigation as measured by an established set of performance criteria (see above). STANDARDS OF SUCCESS o Vegetation Sampling Methodology and Monitoring Schedule The monitoring program shall count each plant initially installed within both the initial and supplemental mitigation areas. The evah,1ation of the success of the overall mitigation program shall be based on the selected. survival rate for trees and shrubs. These defined performance criteria shall be applied at the times of yearly monitoring. The percent survival rate shall be based on combined counts of existing, volLJnteer plants, and planted species during vegetation monitoring. Sample location shall be shown on the "record drawings" (i.e. "as-built") plan, and shall ~rrespond to identified 7 04065 SUPPLEMENTAL PROGRAM . photopoints. Trees and ~. Jbs shall be visually evaluated , determine the rate of survivorship, health, and vigor of each plant. The categories to be used shall include live, stressed, tip dieback, basal sprouts, not found, apparently dead, and dead. Monitoring of the supplemental mitigation area shall be completed as a part of the . ongoing monitoring program already established for the initial mitigation actions. The initial mitigation,program was begun during 2006 and the first-year monitoring assessment shall be completed at the end of the 2007 growing season. 1. As a part of each monitoring period the project biologist shall count the number of live plants initially planted within the supplemental mitigation area. Plants shall be identified to species and observations of general plant condition (i.e., plant health, amount of new growth) shall be recorded for each plant. 2. Within the supplemental mitigation area the project biologist shall count the number of undesirable invasive plants and estimate the aerial coverage (as if the observer were looking straight down from above) of these invasive plants. Undesirable plants include blackberries, Scot's broom, tansy ragwort, reed canarygrass, and plants listed in the Washington State Noxious Weed List. 3. Within the supplemental mitigation area the project biologist shall count the number of desirable "volunteer" plants and estimate the aerial coverage of these plants. 4. The project biologist shall take photographs that show the entire supplemental mitigation area. During the ongoing monitoring period photos shall be taken in the same direction and at the same location to provide a series of photos. These photos shall show plant growth, plant species, and plant coverage. 5. Upon the completion of each annual monitoring period the project biologist shall prepare a report defining methods, observations, and results along with the date the observations were completed. Each report shall be provided to the County. 6. The ongoing monitoring schedule is defined as: A. Twice a year for two years following the completion of Initial onsite planting. For each monitoring year, onsite monitoring would be completed once early in the growing season {late March to mid-April) and once again near the end of the growing season (mid-September). For each onsite monitoring activity an annual report would be prepared and provided to King County within three weeks after the completion of the fall monitoring. . . B. Once a year for years three. four. and five following the completion of initial onsite planting. For each monitoring year, onsite monitoring would be completed once near the end of the growing season (mid-September). For each 8 04065 SUPPLEMENTAL PROGRAM' onsite monitoring ac.._ .1ty a report would be prepared .,__ .d provided to King County within three weeks after the completion of onsite monitoring. o Vegetation Monitoring Sequencing MONITORING PLANT COMMUNITY SUBMITTAL OF MONITORING YEAR, MONITORING REPORT YEAR-1 On or about April 15, 2007 On or about Sept. 15, 2007 Reoort due Oct. 7, 2007 YEAR-2 On or about April 15, 2008 On or about Seot. 15, 2008 Report due Oct. 7, 2008 YEAR-3 On or about Sept. 15, 2009 Reno rt due Oct. 7, 2009 YEAR-4 On or about Sept. 15, 2010 Reoort due Oct. 7, 2010 YEAR-5 On or about Seot. 15, 2011 Reoort due Oct. 7, 2011 VEGETATION MAINTENANCE PLAN Maintenance of the supplemental mitigation area may be required to assure the long- term health and welfare of the wetland's environmental functions. Such maintenance would be identified during the monitoring period and undertaken only following discussion and coordination with King County. The overall objective is to establish undisturbed plant communities that do not require maintenance. Activities may include, but are not limited to, the removal of invasive non-native vegetation and the irrigation of . selected areas. Established maintenance activities include the removal of any trash within the wetland or buffer. REMOVAL OF INVASIVE NON-NATIVE VEGETATION As a contingency, should the removal of invasive non-native vegetation become necessary within the supplemental mitigation area the project proponent shall contact King County to establish and define specific actions to be taken. Resultant contingency plan activities shall be implemented when the ongoing vegetation monitoring program indicates that plants listed in the Washington State Noxious Weed List, blackberries, reed canarygrass, or Scot's broom are becoming dominant in the community or exceed 15% of the aerial coverage of the planting areas. CONTINGENCY PLAN As a contingency, should the proposed compensatory mitigation program fail to meet the performance criteria, the project proponent shall undertake required remedial . actions. Where plant survival is the failing component, the project proponent shall replant and ensure the success of this second planting which would be held to the same standard of success as measured by threshold criteria and monitoring processes. 9 04065 SUPPLEMENTAL PROGRAM . Where non-native, invasi\ ~ vegetation exceeds 15% aeria, JVerage the project proponent shall undertake removal actions. Such removal actions shall be completed using hand tools or pulling the plants by hand to remove the invasive vegetation without disrupting the soil profile. All cut or pulled vegetation shall be removed from the mitigation area and disposed in an approved location. Herbicides shall only be used following approval by King County. All herbicide application shall be completed by a licensed profes~ional. · Should additional remedial actions be required, the project proponent shall meet with the King County to establish and define actions to be taken to meet the desired goal of this mitigation program. TEMPORARY IRRIGATION The project proponent shall ensure that a minimum of one (1) inch of water is supplied each week to the compensatory mitigation area between June 1 and October 15 for a feast the first two years following initial planting. The calculated amount of required water shall include both natural rainfall and temporary irrigation. The need for additional years of irrigation shall be determined based on site conditions and overall plant survival. The amount of water supplied to the compensatory mitigation area shall be increased if onsite monitoring defines such a need. PLANTING NOTES Alf plant materials utilized within the supplemental mitigation area shall be native to the Puget Sound Region. The onsite biologist shall inspect plant materials to assure the appropriate plant schedule and plant characteristics are met. The project proponent shall warrant that all plants would remain alive and healthy for a period of one year following completion of planting activities. The project proponent shall replace all dead and unhealthy plants with plants of the same specifications. FINANCIAL GUARANTEE Financial guarantee shall be provided for the supplemental mitigation program consistent with the King County Bond Work Sheet (Appendix B). The guarantee may be added to the existing guarantee already in place for the initial mitigation program or may be completed as an independent project element. , Thank you for allowing Habitat Technologies the opportunity to assist with your project. Sincerely, ~~~ __,AL.,.__,...__ Thomas D. Deming 10 04065 SUPPLEMENTAL PROGRAM REFERENCE LIST Adamus, P.R., E.J. Clairain Jr., R.D. Smith, and R.E. Young. 1987. Wetland Evaluation Technique (WET); Volume II: Methodology,-Operational Draft Technical Report Y-87, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Office of Biological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, FWS/OBS-79/31. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. Federal lnteragency Committee for Wetland Delineation. 1989. Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. Cooperative technical publication. 76 pp. plus appendices. Hitchcock, C.L., A. Cronquist. 1977. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press. Seattle, Washington. Reppert, R.T., W. Sigleo, E. Stakhiv, L. Messman, and C. Meyers. 1979. Wetland Values -Concepts and Methods for Wetland Evaluation. Research Report 79-R1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soils Conservation Service. Soils Survey of King County Area Washington, February 1979. Washington State Department of Fisheries, Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization, Volume 1., 1975. · 11 04065 SUPPLEMENTAL PROGRAM ' APPENtolXA Beneficial Uses of Plants Proposed for Planting in the Wetland and Buffer 112 04065 SUPPLEMENTAL PROGRAM TREE STRATA BOTANICAL NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME Douglas fir Pseudotsuaa menziesli Western red cedar Thuja plicata Western hemlock Tsuga heterophylla Sitka spruce Picea sitchensls big leaf maple Acer macrophyllum Oregon ash F111Xlnus latifolla Western paper birch Betula nsnvrtvera cascara Rhamnus nurshiana . bitter cherry ·Prunus emara/nata Western crabapple . Pvrus fusca black hawthorne Crataeaus doualas/1 Pacific willow Salix /aslandra BENEFICIAL USES OF PLANTS USED IN WETLAND AND BUFFER RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES INDICATOR PLANTING BENEFICIAL USES STATUS LOCATION FACU buffer Provides escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and food for wildlife. Excellent insect habitat which are orev for wildlife. Important structural habitat comnnnent, alive or as a snag. FAC wetland and Provides escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and food for wildlife. Habitat for insects which are buffer prey for wildlife. Important structural habitat component, alive or as a snag. Good along riparian areas. Good soH stabifitv value. · FACU buffer Provides escape/refuge cover, nesting locatlons, and food for wildlife. Also habitat for insects which are prey for wildlife. Important structural habitat component, alive or as a snag. Good along riparian areas. FAC wetland and Provides escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and food for wildlife. $eed cones drop in fall. Also buffer habitat for insects which are prey for wildlife. Important structural habitat component, alive or as a snao. Good soil stabilitv value. FACU · buffer lmpqrtarit structural habitat component; alive or as a snag. Stumps produce dense mass of sprout stems. Seed eaten by many wildlife speci.es. Provides escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and . insect habitat. Good soil stabilitv value. . FACW wetland and Female trees produce seeds that are eaten by many species of wildlife. Provides escape/refuge buffer edge cqver, nesting locations, and Insect habitat FAC weUand edge Hardy, fast growing. Seeds especially valued by goldfinches, siskins, and juncos. Provides escape/refu1ie cover, nesting locations, and insect habitat · FAC-buffer edge Good soil-binding characteristics and grows well in disturbed sites. Provides escape/refuge cover, . nesting locations, and excellent insect habitat. Fruit eaten by wildlife. · FACU buffer Provides escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and .insect habitat. Fruit eaten bywildlife. Good soil stability value. " FACW wetland and Provides escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and insect habitat. Fruit eaten by wildlife. Good buffer ed!le soil stability value. · · . FAC wetland and Dense crown provides escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and insect habitat Fruit eaten by buffer edge wildlife. Good soil stability value. -. FACW+ wettandand Excellent soil-binding characteristics and very effective erosion control. Provides escape/refuge buffer edge cover, nesting locaUons, and excellent insect habitat Does not produce seed or fruit for use by wildlife. · SHRUB AND GROUND COVER STRATA · BOTANICAL NAME INDICATOR PLANTING BENEFICIAL USES SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS LOCATION Sitka willow FACW · wetland and Fast growing .. Excellent soil-binding characteris)ics arid very effective erosion control. Provides Salix sltchensls buffer edge escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and excellent insect habitat. Does not produce seed or fruit for use bv wildlife. Scouler willow FAC wetland and Fast growing. Excellent soil-binding characteristics and very effective eras.ion control. Provides Salix scouleriana buffer edge · escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and excellent insect habitat. Does not produce seed or fruii . for use bv Wildlife. red-osier dogwood FACW wetland and Excellent soil-binding characteristics. Attractive multi-stem shrub with or without stems. Excellent Comus sto/onffera bufferedae escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and insect habitat. White fruit eaten by wildlife. salmon berry FAC+ wetland and Good SOU-binding characteristics. Well adapted to disturbed areas. Fruit has high food value for Rubus snectab/lls bufferedae wildlife. · Nootka rose FAC wetland and Excellent soil-binding characteristics. Well adapted to disturbed areas. Fruit has high food value Rosa nutkana bufferedoe and are persistent well Into winter. • • peafruit rose FAC wetland and Excellent soil-binding characteristics. Well adapted to disturbed areas. Fruit has high food value Rosa oisocama buffer edge and are persistent well into winter. wild rose ' FACU bufferand Excellent soil-binding characteristics. Well adapted to disturbed areas: Fruit has liigh food value Rosa n11mnocama bufferedoe and are =rsistent well Into winter. Pacific nlneliark , FACW-wetland and Excellent soil-binding characteristics. Flowers are attractive to hummingbirds. Provides escape and Phvsocamus cao/tatus buffer edge refuge cover, nesting locations, and insect habitat . vine maple FAC-buffer edge Excellent soil-binding characteristics. Multi-stem shrull. Excellent escape/refuge cover, nesting Acer ctrc/natum locations, and insect habitat. Winged fruit eaten by wildlife. salal ·' FACU buffer Good soil-binding characteristics and tolerant to poor soils. Produces edible berries used by some Gaultheria shal/on wildlife. Provides excellent ground cover for wildlife escape and refuae. Oregon grape UP.L buffer Good soil-binding characteristics. Produces edible berries used by soine wildlife. Provides excellent Barberis ne,vosa ground cover for wildlife escaoe and refuge. · · · snowberry FACU buffer Excellent soil-binding characteristics. Produces edible berries used by wildlife. Provides escape and· Svmphoricamus a/bus refuoe cover, nesting locations, and insect habitat. black twlnberry FAC+ buffer Good soil-binding characteristics. Produces edible fruit Flowers are attractive to hummingbirds. Lonlcera /nvo/ucrata Provides escape and refuge cover, nestina locations, and insect habitat Pacific red elderberry FACU buffer Good soil-binding characteristics. Produces edible fruit Flowers are attractive to hummingbirds. Sambucus racemosa Provides esca"" and refuge cover, nestina locations, and Insect habitat · prickly current FAC+ wetland and Produces edible fruit Flowers are attractive to hummingbirds. Provides escape and refuge cover, Rlbes lacustre buffer edge and insect habitat. .. BOTANICAL NAME INDICATOR PLANTING BENEFICIAL USES I SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS LOCATION gooseberry . FAC wetland and Produces edible fruit Flowers are attractive to hummingbirds. Provides escape and refuge cover, Rlbes dlvarlcatum buffer edge and insect habitat. flowering current UPL buffer Produces edible fruit. Flowers are attractive to ·hummingbirds. Provides escape and refuge cover, Rlbes sanaulneum and insect habitat hazelnut FACU buffer Excellent soil-binding characteristics. Multf'.stem shrub. Excellent escape/refuge cover, nesting Corvlus comuta locations; and insect habitat. Nuts eaten bv wildlife. lmnnrtant small mammal winter stored foo(l. kinnlklnnick FACU-buffer Good soil-binding characteristics. Produces abundant, edible berries used by some wildlife. Arctostaohvlos wa-ursl Provides excellent around cover for wildlife esca= and refune. thirribleberry FAC-buffer Produces edible fruit Flowers are attractive to hummingbirds. Provides escape and refuge cover, Rubus oarviflorus and insect habitat. evergreen huckleberry UPL buffer Good soil-binding characteristics and tolerant to poor soils. Produces edible be[ries used by some Vacclnium ovatum wildlife. Provides excellent ground cover for wildlife escape 1;1nd refuge. oceanspray -buffer Good soil-blhding characteristics and does well on disturbed sites. Multi-stem shrub. Excellent Holodlscus discolor escape/refuge cover, nesting locations, and insect habitat. Seeds persist through-the winter and are eaten tru wildlife. . · ' slough sedge .. OBL weUand Good soil-binding characteristics and does well in disturbed sites. Seeds persist through the winter Carax obnui,ta and are eaten by wildlife. small fruited bulrush ' OBL weHand Good soil-binding characteristics. Seeds eaten by wildlife. Scimus mlcrocarnus common cattail . OBL weUand Good soil-binding characteristics and does well in disturbed sites. Stems and seeds are eaten by Tvnha /atlfolia wildlife. Provides escape and refuge cover, nesting sites, and Insect habitat. APPENDIX B SUPPLEMENTAL ACTION· King County Bond Work Sheet 13 04065 SUPPl -'1ENTAL PROGRAl\11 I . = • ~ N N 0 z 5 e w • ' 3.LIS 1130N3A3 NOI.LV!>I.LIW 1V.LN3W31ddns 11 11i· I . I' • I • 11 I ; I 11 1 Ii I I I Pi:1 I Jll' I i t,111 I ,11, i{ l ih i i .1 Jlil'''I , 1''1111 ' ·1fil 'ti.1 I'• li11 ,1 f i iUtltt!I J 1lhtih I lt11iuhl ! :fl1 1ti1 tilll tUi u11 t ti 11 llilll{li ! Iiliiill ~ i!l!illtit i llllllil JIiii! !iiil !1il1 ! j1l{1 Brandt, Lisa From: Sent: To: Subject: Tom and Steve, Brandt, Lisa Tuesday, September 25, 2007 3:23 PM Brandt, Lisa; 'habitattech@quest.net'; 'Steve Browning' RE: A04BN275 Evendell {Sorry)}orgot to include a comment regarding the bond amount. We currently still hold the full performance bond for "$.1.it.J62.-U'sually once mitigation installation is approved we will reduce 70% of this bond, holding the 30% as a maintenance bond to be held for tl;le.remainder of the monitoring. In this case rather than have to post an additional bond for the additional mitigation, we will retain 50% of this borid when all installation has been approved. Thanks again. Lisa From: Sent: To: Subject: -------. - Brandt, Lisa Tuesday, September 25, 2007 3:08 PM 'habitattech@quest.net'; 'Steve Browning' A04BN27S Evendell Hello Tom and Steve, .' Thank you for meeting me at the Evendell site today, with. the rest of the group. To follow-up with the wetland enhancement ratios I discussed, we can use the original 2:1 wetland enhancement ratio for the new wetland impacts (due to the utility corridor). Tom, per the plans; Item 2 of Description of the Wetland Program states Tract P was added buffer to compensation for the reduced buffer caused l:)yJhe development of SE 136th St. I do not see that the.square.footages,were.calculated.for.this,,__ ~uff~r ~2schange . .ITwm need you Jo .c.alculate:tne) 36th'.St~b.uffer;imJ:iacts alcii,'g:with,the·new·Utility ·Easement.impacts.to__;,:,. =~:.ure that Tract.P (sq. footage) __ sJ.~:9-omp~~s~t~s fo!'both/lf not, buffer enhancement will be required as we reviewed on In reviewing the monitoring.and,bonding.status,-1. found that I miss stated the length of the monitoring period. The original mitigation is on a'\5 -year monitoring period whi1h would terminate in Fall 2010 (based on 2006 as year 1) if all permit conditions and stancjaras of success haviflleen met. If the new mitigation can be installed this fall, then we will not.have to extend the monitoring period, and the revised mitigation~tilfbe-incorporateil mtofhe sa111e monitoring.period~ ... -... , .. __ ,,...,. --=---· Let me know if you have questions. Thanks Lisa Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist Land Use Seivices, ODES 900 Oakesdale Ave. Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5219 tel: 206-296-6764 fax: 206-296-7051 Please note Email Address change! Lisa.brandt@kingcounty.gov 1 .. ·" Brandt, Lisa From: Brandt, Lisa Sent: To: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 3:19 PM Young, Jay Subject: A04BN275 Evendell Hey Jay, I met with folks from SBI Developing and Habitat Technologies at Evendell today. It seems the 2:·1 slope is within the Utility Easement which does now have utility lines barried under the slope (impacting the wetland and buffers). Based on these utilities the wall can not be put in. The impacts will have to be mitigated for through further wetland and buffer enhancement. I am working with Habitat Technologies to submit a revised plan to the approved mitigation plan dated 6/3/04. At this point they hope to install the additional mitigation within Oct./Nov., once a revised plan is approved. Since we still hold the performance bond in full for $19,162 we are covered if you want to move forward on any of your approvals. Once the work is implemented I will only allow a 50% bond reduction which will eliminate the need for any additional bond posting. If you have any questions please drop by. Lisa Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist Land Use Services, DDES 900 Oakesdale Ave. Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5219 tel: 206-296-6764 fax: 206-296-7051 Please note Email Address change! Usa.brandt@kinqcounty.gov 1 Young,Jay From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Kurt, Young, Jay Thursday, September 13, 2007 1 :53 PM 'Kurt Wilson' Steve Browning; Brandt, Lisa; Pray, Jeff FW: A04BN275-Evendell L01 P0016 I: It appears the fill for the 2: 1 slope from the sidewalk to existing ground encroached into the wetland. A new mitigation plan is required to address the portion of the wetland that was impacted. The rockery needs to be installed to the specifications of Dwg. No. 5-006 of the 1993 KCRS. Thanks Jay Young From: Sent: To: Subject: Jay, Brandt, Lisa Thursday, September 13, 2007 12:40 PM Young, Jay; Gillen, Nick A04BN275-Evendell L01P0016 I inspected the wetland and slope atEvendell which we talked about yesterday. The 2:1 slope does extend 11' out from the sidewalk into the wetland. It appears that the original clearing limit silt fence had not been appropriately located at the R.O.W limit. On the engineering drawing, isn't the rockery drawn in the side walk? It appears that the sidewalk extends to the R.O.W. limit line and if they add a rockery beyond the existing sidewalk they may still be impacting the wetland. In either case the fill of the slope extends approx. 65' along the length of the wetland. The approved rockery should have been 85' in length to protect the wetland. The grade change is very close to 4' ht. so the rockery will need to be engineered and if the sidewalk remains the top of the rockery would likely need a hand rail. Let me know how you will be proceeding. I met on site with the Wetland Consultant they have been using and they are interested in keeping abreast of the issue. Lisa 1 Brandt, Lisa From: Sent: To: Subject: Jay, Brandt, Lisa Thursday, September 13, 2007 12:40 PM Young, Jay; Gillen, Nick A04BN275-Evendell L01 P0016 I inspected the wetland and slope at Evendell which we.talked about yesterday. The 2: 1 slope does extend 11' out from the sidewalk into the wetland. It appears that the original clearing limit silt fence had not been appropriately located at the R.O.W limit. On the engineering drawing, isn't the rockery drawn in the side walk? It appears that the sidewalk extends to the R.O.W. limit line and if they add a rockery beyond the existing sidewalk they may still be impacting the wetland. In either case the fill of the slope extends approx. 65' along the length of the wetland. The approved rockery should have been 85' in length to protect the wetland. The grade change is very close to 4' ht. so the rockery will need to be engineered and if the sidewalk remains the top of the rockery would likely need a hand rail. Let me know how you will be proceeding. I met on site with the Wetland Consultant they have been using and they are interested in keeping abreast of the issue. Lisa 1 ,,( Poels, Gregory From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Steve Browning [Steve@soundbuilthomes.com] Thursday, June 28, 2007 1 :48 PM Peels, Gregory Brandt, Lisa; jeff@jsjonesassociates.com; bluejayjones@nventure.com FW: King County Response to Evendell Monitoring Attachments: Evendell Monitoring Report.pd! Greg, I am forwarding this monitoring report since Lisa is out Please let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Steve Confidentiality Notice: Page I of I This email message, its content including images and attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosu1·e or distribution, in part or in full, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient then please irrmediately and permanently delete/destroy all copies and versions of this email. Contact Soundbuilt Homes, Inc. at 253-848-0820 if you have any questions. From: Steve Browning Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 1:31 PM To: Lisa Brandt Cc: 'Jeffrey S. Jones (jeff@jsjonesassociates.com)' Subject: RE: King County Response to Evendell Monitoring Lisa, I don't think this was attached to the previous email. Please let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Steve Confidentiality Notice: This email message, its content including images and attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient{s) and may contain conf:ident.i.al and privi.loged info.nnat.ion. Any unauthor:i.zed review, use, disclosure or di.str:i.but:ion, in part or in full, is prohibited. Tf you are not the intended recipient then please immediately and permanently delete/destroy all copies and versions of th.is email, Contact Soundbuilt Homes, Inc. at 253-8-18-0820 if you have any questions. From: bluejayjones [mailto:bluejayjones@nventure.com] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 8:33 AM To: Lisa Brandt Cc: Steve Browning Subject: King County Response to Evendell Monitoring Lisa, Here is your response to our fall Monitoring report. Let me know if you have any further questions. Lance 06/29/2007 •.t L-D46-:C /L, I A/5+ 16/J 27-5 Dear Robert, f_ 0 e-f)b ell-- Thank you for submitting t e Year 1 monitoring r port for the Evendell Mitigation project. The report has been reviewed dl!iccepted ears that most plant material is establishing well and that the willow replaced t sl-si,ring1,ave taken off. The photos submitted demonstrate the good progress within the project. In reviewing the monitoring report, I concur with your general recommendations of invasive removal and debris removal and alder thinning. In the Compensatory Mitigation Program the performance Criterion #1A requires 100% survival of trees and shrubs at the end of year one (page 6). Therefore, replanting should be done to achieve the 100% survival rather than just the two Western Red Cedar proposed in the monitoring report. Please make adjustments to the supplemental planting list to ensure the required plant quantities and species are met. The herbaceous cover on both sides of the silt fence appears adequate for soil stabilization in the photographs submitted. If this is true for the entire site than the silt fence may also be removed at this time. If you have any questions, please contact me at your earliest convenience. Other wise, please notify me when the contingence measures are completed. Thanks again. Lisa Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist Land Use Services, DDES 900 Oakesdale Ave. Southwest Renton, WA 98057 .5219 tel: 206·296,6764 fax: 206·296·7051 Usa.brandt@metrokc gov S,OC Page I of I Brandt, Lisa From: bluejayjones [bluejayjones@nventure.com] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 8:12 AM To: Brandt, Lisa ~ Subject: Evendell Monitoring Report Fall 20 6 (A04BN2 Lisa, SBI forwarded a letter to me regarding not receiving a monitoring report for the Evendell mitigation (A04BN275). We prepared a monitoring report October 6, 2006 and I believe that it was submitted. I have attached a pdf of the report to this email for your review. Let me know if you need anything else. Lance Erickson Environmental Designer J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. 402 East Main Street, Suite 110 Auburn, Washington 98002 253-804-2645 FAX 253-333-8584 bluejruijones@nventure.com www.j§jonesassociates.com 07/10/2007 C . ', / ====~~'cili:::===== .J. S . .Jones and Associa\f;es, Inc. October 6, 2006 Ms. Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist II King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057 RE: Evendell Year I Monitoring SE 136th Street and 160th SE, King County, Washington King County File No. A04BN275 Dear Ms. Brandt: J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. has reviewed the mitigation planting of the Evendell site. Tree and shrub species were identified and counted to determine replacement quantities. Recommendations for supplemental plantings, as well as, any necessary measures to bring the Evendell mitigation site into compliance are presented below. Photos of the mitigation areas are attached. Enhancement Area The plants were originally installed per the approved mitigation plan in August of 2005. Additional willows (Salix spp.) were installed in the spring of 2006 to replace the originals cuttings that died. After a complete year of growth, the plants appear to be healthy and have an established root system. Volunteers such as red alder (A/nus rubra) and salmonberry (Rubus Spectabilis) are starting to sprout in the enhancement area. Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), and field morning glory (Corrvo/vulus arvensis) which is well established in the periphery has slightly spread into the of the enhancement area. Tree and shrub species were counted and compared with the original installed totals in Table 1.0. A total of 54 tree and shrub individuals were counted which is less than the 61 species installed. The monitoring schedule includes a site visit close to the beginning of the growing season for thefirst two years of monitoring. The installation transpired towards the end of summer of2005 growing season and the first monitoring site visit did not occur until September 2006. Since the plants are well established, J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc. recommends waiving the spring visit requirement for the first 2 years 402 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 110 A U B U R N, W A S H I N G T O N 9 8 0 0 2 253-804-2645 / }'AX 253-333-8584 I .J. S. Jr onces and Associa.ies, ][n.c. October 6, 2006 Ms. Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist II King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057 RE: Evendell Year I Monitoring SE 136th Street and 160th SE, King County, Washington King County File No. A04BN275 Dear Ms. Brandt: J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. has reviewed the mitigation planting of the Evendell site. Tree and shrub species were identified and counted to determine replacement quantities. Recommendations for supplemental plantings, as well as, any necessary measures to bring the Evendell mitigation site into compliance are presented below. Photos of the mitigation areas are attached. Enhancement Area The plants were originally installed per the approved mitigation plan in August of 2005. Additional willows (Salix spp.) were installed in the spring of 2006 to replace the originals cuttings that died. After a complete year of growth, the plants appear to be healthy and have an established root system. Volunteers such as red alder (A/nus rubra) and salmonberrY (Rubus Spectabilis) are starting to sprout in the enhancement area. Himalayan blackbeffY (Rubus armeniacus), and field morning glory (Convolvulus arvensis) which is well established in the periphery has slightly spread into the of the enhancement area. Tree and shrub species were counted and compared with the original installed totals in Table 1.0. A total of 54 tree and shrub individuals were counted which is less than the 61 species installed. The monitoring schedule includes a site visit close to the beginning of the growing season for thefirst two years of monitoring. The installation transpired towards the end of summer of 2005 growing season and the first monitoring site visit did not occur until September 2006. Since the plants are well established, J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc. recommends waiving the spring visit requirement for the first 2 years 402 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 110 A U B U R N, W A S H I N G T O N 9 8 0 0 2 253-804-2645 / FAX 253-333-8584 Evendell T bl 10 a e . T reean dSh bS ru ,oec1es COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME INSTALLED QTY. COUNTED QTY W estem red cedar Thuia o/icata 4 3 Sitka soruce Picea sitchensis 2 2 D0u2las fir Pseudotsuf!a menziesii 4 s Western crabannle Ma/us fo.,ca 12 10 Black twinberrv Lonicera involucrata 3 2 Pacific ninebark Phvsocnrm« caoitatus 6 6 Red-osier do<>wood Cornus stolonifera IO 11 Sitka willow Salix sitchensis 20 15 Total 61 54 Recommendations for Buffer Enhancement E-2 o Remove all invasive vegetation from the enhancement area o Remove any refuse from the enhancement area o Thin alder shoots that are competing with installed plants o Install 2 (2 gallon) western red cedar Conclusions The Evendell mitigation area that was installed within the mitigation areas is healthy and thriving. Minimal mortality is present. To have the mitigation planting approved, supplemental planting and continued maintenance is necessary. lfyou have any questions regarding this as-built letter, please contact us at 253-874-9588 or by email at robert@jsjonesassociaties.com. Sincerely, Robert King Wetland Scientist cc: Steve Browning, SBI Developing, Inc. File Copy October 2006 2 J. S. Jone:1 and AuociaJe.f, Inc. ., Evendell Northwest edge of mitigation area (view to southeast) Plantings in the center of mitigation area (view to south) October 2006 3 J. S. Jones and AMociate.,, Inc. tQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov June 7, 2007 Mr. Kurt Wilson c/o SB! Development PO Box 73790 Puyallup, WA 98373 RE: Subject: Financial Guarantee Activity Number A04BN275 -L04Gl143 Sensitive Area Mitigation -Monitoring Reports Dear Mr. Wilson: This is a form letter reminder that the Sensitive Area Mitigation financial guarantee associated with permit LOIP0016 requires monitoring. Our records show that annual monitoring report 2006 (due Oct 31) was not received. These annual reports are crucial infonnation to track and ensure that your mitigation monitoring project remains in compliance and continues to progress toward final release. If you have prepared and submitted a report, we did not get it for some reason. Please resubmit one copy to Lisa Brandt at the contact information above. We encourage you to be thorough in presenting the current site conditions as it relates to the permit conditions and standards of success (i.e. percent survival, cover of planted plants, invasive species percent cover, maintenance, site description etc.). ; If you have not gathered field data or prepared a monitoring report by this time, it will be necessary to contact me directly at 206-296-6764 or Lisa.Brandt@metrokc.gov . We can discuss the site conditions and the submittals necessary to maintain monitoring status of the project. If we do not hear from you within 60 days, it may be necessary for me to inspect the site to determine the project status. There will be a fee of$140.00 per hour for the time required to do the site inspection. We look forward to hearing from you in the near future. Sincerely, Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist II Critical Areas Section cc: File 1 Brandt, Lisa From: Sent: To: Subject: Dear Robert, Brandt, Lisa Wednesday, October 25, 2006 9:15 AM J Jones; 'Robert King' A04BN275 Evendell Year 1 Monitoring Thank you for submitting the Year 1 monitoring report for the Evendell Mitigation project. The report has been reviewed and accepted. It appears that most plant material is establishing well and that the willow replaced this past spring have taken off. The photos submitted demonstrate the good progress within the project. In reviewing the monitoring report, I concur with your general recommendations of invasive removal and debris removal and alder thinning. In the Compensatory Mitigation Program the performance Criterion #1A requires 100% survival of trees and shrubs at the end of year one (page 6). Therefore, replanting should be done to achieve the 100% survival rather than just the two Western Red Cedar proposed in the monitoring report. Please make adjustments to the supplemental planting list to ensure the required plant quantities and species are met. The herbaceous cover on both sides of the silt fence appears adequate for soil stabilization in the photographs submitted. If this is true for the entire site than the silt fence may also be removed at this time. If you have any questions, please contact me at your earliest convenience. Other wise, please notify me when the contingence measures are completed. Thanks again. Lisa Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist Land Use Services, DOES 900 Oakesdale Ave. Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5219 tel: 206-296-6764 fax: 206-296-7051 Lisa.brandt@metrokc.gov 1 ;.,·q, Brandt, Lisa From: Brandt, Lisa Sent: To: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 11:30 AM 'J Jones' Subject: RE: Evendell Property A04BN275 A04BN275 The Evendell Property Mitigation Project October I 0, 2006 Hello Lance I was just reviewing the file for the Evendell project at SE 135th St. and I601h St. SE east of Renton. Base on our records the installation was approved last September with the understanding that additional actions would be taken to fully put the project in order. At this time I had requested to be contacted once the work was completed. I had not heard that it was done, thus I had also not approved the bond for reduction. Can you update me on the project status? Have you been contracted to complete monitoring this fall? Please let me know on both accounts. Thanks Lisa Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist Land Use Seivices, ODES 900 Oakesdale Ave. Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5219 tel: 206-296-6764 fax: 206-296-7051 Lisa.brandt@metrokc.gov From: Sent: To: Subject: Brandt, Lisa Tuesday, August 23, 2005 6:00 PM J Jones Evendell Property A04BN275 Lance Erickson Please forward to: Rich Barber SBI Developing Inc. RE: A04BN275 -Evendell Property Subject: Enhancement Planting As-built Letter Hello Lance, 1 ···~ Thank you for submitting the installation and As-built Letter for the Evendall Property. The letter confirmed installation was completed per the approved mitigation plan and included the appropriate As-built plan. We have documented the information and will be conducting an installation inspection. Once the site has been inspected and approved the mitigation performance bond will be approved for reduction to a maintenance monitoring bond and the monitoring period will be initiated. I will contact you once the installation inspection has been completed. If you have any questions please contact me. Lisa Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist 11 King County ODES/ LUSD -Critical Areas 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 phone: (206) 296-6764 fax: (206) 296-7051 r'11w,1: J.i.5;1.:.l.\rn.n.9J@.m9_trn~_(:,.!!PY 2 .. .J. S. .J o n e s a. n ell. A s s o c i a. t e s , I n c • October 6, 2006 Ms. Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist II King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057 RE: Evendell '{_ear 1 Monitoring Ok > '/~· SE 1361 h Street and 1601h SE, King County, Washington King County File No. A04BN275 LC><{&.11'-t-3 Dear Ms. Brandt: <7 \ ('-c.-0 /0· 16 ·Ofo J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. has reviewed the mitigation planting of the Evendell site. Tree and shrub species ~ere identified and counted to determine replacement quantities. Recommendations for supplemental plantings, as well as, any necessary measures to bring the Evendell mitigation site into compliance are presented below. Photos of the mitigation areas are attached. Enhancement Area The plants were originally installed per the approved mitigation plan in August of 2005. Additional willows (Salix spp.) were installed in the spring of 2006 to replace the originals cuttings that died. After a complete year of growth, the plants appear to be healthy and have an established root system. Volunteers such as red alder (A/nus rubra) and salmonberry (Rubus Spectabilis) are starting to sprout in the enhancement area. Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), and field morning glory (Convolvulus arvensis) which is well established in the periphery has slightly spread into the of the enhancement area. Tree and shrub species were ~o~nt.ed and compared with t~e ~riginal installed totals .in '.able 1.0. A total of 54 tree and shrub . .. i a,..\ , md1v1duals were counted which 1s less than the 61 species mstalled. £,'2, 7c. .;,.--r~ ll:I~ The monitoring schedule includes a site visit close to the beginning of the growing season for thefirst two years of monitoring. The installation transpired towards the end of summer of2005 growing season and the first monitoring site visit did not occur until September 2006. Since the plants are well established, J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc. recommends waiving the spring visit requirement for the first 2 years 4 0 2 EA ST M A I N S TR E ET, S U I T E I I 0 A U B U R N, W A S H I N G T O N 9 8 0 0 2 253-804-2645 I FAX 253-333-8584 Evandell Table 1.0 Tree and Shrub Snecies COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME INSTALLED QTY. COUNTED QTY Western red cedar Thuia n/icata 4 3 Sitka snruce Picea sitchensis . 2 2 Douelas fir Pseudotsuva rnenziesii 4 5 Western crabannle Ma/us (usca 12 10 Black twinberrv Lonicera involucrata 3 2 Pacific ninebark Phvsocarnus canitatus 6 6 Red-osier doowood Cornus stolonifera 10 II Sitka willow Salix sitchensis 20 IS Total 61 54 Recommendations for Buffer Enhancement E-2 v o Remove all invasive vegetation from the enhancement area ,/ o Remove any refuse from the enhancement area .,, o Thin alder shoots that are competing with installed plants ~r ]Dstall 2 (2 gallon) western red cedar ,J~s 1~/4 (!, 1,AD c,:,,.-, I,, or: -(vp., ,~ '"1' tt,-l--, fv,-.JC. 02¥?<0-'~..-l.:o~ Conclusions The Evendell mitigation area that was installed within the mitigation areas is healthy and thriving. Minimal mortality is present. To have the mitigation planting approved, supplemental planting and .continued maintenance is necessary. If you have any questions regarding this as-built letter, please contact us at 253-874-9588 or by email at robert@jsjonesassociaties.com. Sincerely, '7'~~1 Robert King Wetland Scientist cc: Steve Browning, SB! Developing, Inc. File Copy October 2006 2 J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. • Evandell Northwest edge of mitigation area (view to southeast) Plantings in the center of mitigation area (view to south) October 2006 3 J. S Jones and Associates, Inc. • -.. Brandt, Lisa From: Brandt, Lisa Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 9:58 AM To: Subject: J Jones ) A04BN275 Evendell Property l~~Q.-1 Hello Lance and Jeff, I have reviewed and approved the wetland/buffer mitigation installation at the Evendell Property however, this approval is with the understanding that a few items will be addressed. The performance bond will not be approved for a reduction into a maintenance monitoring bond, until this work is completed. Following is a brief summary of the installation inspection with the items which need to be addressed. On Sept. 8, 2005 the Evendell wetland mitigation area was inspected for installation and compliance to the approved plan. All plant material had been installed, and as noted in the installation completion letter from J S Jones and Associates many willows had died due to lack of water. J S Jones noted they would be replanted this fall. In reviewing the installation, the plantings had also been installed with a spacing of 2-4' on center, instead of the required spacing per the approved plan of: 1 O' o.c. for conifers, 8' o.c. for Western crabapple, and 4' o.c. for shrubs. Due to the tight spacing these plants will need to be relocated in the fall when transplanting is more appropriate. There are large patches of Himalayan blackberry to the west of the planting site which should be cleared of blackberry and used for respacing the plants appropriately. Blackberries should be hand grubbed to ensure all roots are removed with minimal damage to the surrounding native plants. The total mitigated area needs to be verified to ensure that 550 sq. ft. of area has been replanted per the plan requirements. In reviewing the site, the silt fence was also found to have been over topped with soil behind lots 34/35 and holes in the fence were apparent behind lots 31 /32. Excavated soils should be removed from the silt fence and the holes should be repaired as soon as possible. The approved mitigation plan also clearly dictates a temporary irrigation plan and schedule for the mitigation area which has not been implemented. Watering in the dry season of 2006 and 2007 must be implemented to ensure plant establishment is possible. A letter of notification should be submitted to clarify what watering plan has been established. Once these items are addressed the performance bond will be approved for a reduction to a maintenance monitoring bond. If you have questions please contact me at 206-296-6764. Thank you. Lisa Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist II King County ODES/ LUSD -Critical Areas 900 OakesdaJe A venue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 phone: (206) 296-6764 fax: (206) 296-7051 t•11:aii: lis:i.toran_dt.@_m~trokc,1.~iv 1 Brandt, Lisa From: Sent: To: Subject: Lance Erickson Please forward to: .. Brandt, Lisa Tuesday, August 23, 2005 6:00 PM J Jones ,, Evendell Property A04BN275 Rich Barber SBI Developing Inc. RE: A04BN275 -Evendell Property Subject: Enhancement Planting As-built Letter Hello Lance, .. Thank you for submitting the installation and As-built Letter for the Evendall Property. The letter confirmed installation was completed per the approved mitigation plan and included the appropriate As-built plan. We have documented the information and will be conducting an installation inspection. Once the site has been inspected and approved the mitigation performance bond will be approved for reduction to a maintenance monitoring bond and the monitoring period will be initiated. I will contact you once the installation inspection has been completed. If you have any questions please contact me. Lisa Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist II King County ODES/ LUSD -Critical Areas 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 phone,' (206) 296-6764 Jax,' (206) 296-7051 email: li.i<1,.l7r~11dt(CJJrnc1n1k.,: .. g_O\· 1 I .. _(\A .. =====· .. ~ ... ~ 1'7z __ """'"' ·""""""'=== J". S. J" o n e s a. n d A s s o c i a. i e s , ][ n c • August 15, 2005 Mr. Nick Gillen Environmental Scientist III King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055 '7 'i:;:, 14' fj · I~ ·OS- ~ ,'5' Kv 1c>,' ~~17;., f'cd'ID ~Dl.l,)·, ->, ,"l.'f. RE: Evendell Enhancement Planting As-built Letter SE· 136th Street and 160th Avenue SE, King County, Washington King County File No.: A04BN275 LO""t"i:t= I 4 S Dear Mr. Gillen: J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. has completed the installation of enhancement plantings for the Evendell site. The plant material was installed according to plan. Most of the willow plantings did not the recent hot weather. The dead willows will be replaced this fall when the weather is more suitable. Volunteer red alder saplings are present in the mitigation area. The saplings were thinned in areas to allow for planting. Photos of the installation and a redline drawing are attached. If you have any questions regarding the planting, please contact us at 253-874-9588 or by email at bluejayjones@nventure.com. Lance Erickson Environmental Designer cc: Rich Barber, SBI Developing, Inc. File Copy 35316 28th AVENUE SOUTH F E D E R A L W A Y, W A S H I N G T O N 9 8 0 0 3 253-874-9588 / FAX 253-874-9579 ' -Evendell -Planting Northwest edge of mitigation area (view to southeast) Center of mitigation area (view to southwest) August 2005 2 J . S. Jones and Associates, Inc. - ( -Evendell -Planting Willow plantings in the center of mitigation area (view to south) Northeast edge of mitigation area (view to southwest) August 2005 3 J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. -.-\ .. l .. ,, • "' ., ... " ,. "' . '"" ii ood "'"' ,ting " 11ttcd ••• , .. '~ :r~c~. porw~1. Ill 11\e ... .,. -· 07:00 253539~ SOUNDBUILT HOME~ IMPI.EMEt,iTA.TIDN SCHEDULE []Cf TA81'. 1\1111 &lmp'l!UTllf\1&1\orl ,\ 1111,QOI' , Pll!te-n9'1 of pnncct...-11 f•11U19, llflol m:s•ld"9, '"d 1nll1'1t.ltl01'1 orwal'l<.are~. "1111~ or dl11Ur IIWH. ti •Uof\ O r1IIO"'II Dnd tr,.hlf\ttd W!:11.ll'!d 1,n ,, .. LOr :1r.c111111a"ctd-n~.-1111. 11c0f'd•lr11w!n , " 11 Ctl c:11un ~OJEC:T ..,ONlTORIHG STAND,ARO,oJ: succ~U SK :;c;:H~OULE com ·i-!1i:1 NJ . 1,; 20011· CD!Tlp!Dled 'c,f A.!19. JD. 2004 V1111e\tll611 u1111si11n11 N101t111111ot1>gy ind M11t1l1Dtl"t lahc:du/11 Tho fflQ11hl!M9 profr,'" ,t1t!l c111111l •""' pl..-.t lrllrl.allo/ 11111~,.f 'IMll'lln Illa fltldlld tl'ICI •n~.arum1 '"'"'"" · IIClt. TM ..,~1u111on of U'll t•laMl:I• aflhe c::Q!TIPIIIIMOJ}'lftll,:1don Jtl!Qr-11'18l b11 b:le~d 1111 ,ho neltCIO" .u!\llvol r,\o fllr'""" ,na iht\lbt, 'Tll••• dallm,d ptlf(llftlarltt a,uo~~ ,,..,11 O• 1ppllod 11 Lh1 ll1r1u llf na~y ,rtotli\G'lnp The ,...-i, iur,,ly.i\ nll ,1,0 be tl•wad on Clllfflllllllld 1111~nl1 or ,~l~ll"'f, vol\inla•' i,l~llfa, and "'""*' •~'*• dl,if~, .-.ootatlar, "'°"ltol'~o. ea'"pro loc;:illoft •11111 ba Ulawn d111ft1 ·~rd dl'1w1111W U,111. ·a~·biAUi p1111. and ,..__ tlll'Tnponll' lo ldi:nttnlll' pl',otada!nt.,, T~H .u1c1 1hrvb~ ah~n bl ""111111111,...Mll"CI IQ d,:1 11rrnne u,~ ,111 al """'1~11l<lp, IDD~h, al'ld '1iQof ,r ... ,, planl. Till!,c1iog11rtc, lo be 11,nd 1h1!1 lndlldt it,,11,, SLl'IIO~, Ill) dl.ii..1111, baUI tp111UII, n.~ fa11nd, OPOll'llr"IIWdllld, and tto,11!, • . . Vagoll,Uon MD1di.atlng 1. "-~ ~ "'" ol Heh rn0 111l0t1t1G ~t~PCI IN! pll:ljad blolotlll 1n1111 cau!ll lhe numbcrrof 11~111 plsntl !11lll~lly plel'llllld Wi\nlr, tlia rei,re1"'1l•llv111mdc plolL P111t1I• 1~1\1 tx1 lde1nur,,.c, lo~""'• and otur,111lltin11 Of Oc:1'!11'11 pi11'11 eal"dklon (l.t., pllllt 11u11r,, llffiOUIII of l'IIM111'Q'°"l'il sha11 bo Hi;lll"l!•d lo, a~d\ Ol1nL 2. · Wlhln \hi 19'111"'4 ind 1nha110tidWl!IUlnd U11 praj11Ct bldJ011\1l th~l 1111....i It'll l'ILl!!lllfl' of mda::llab11 IIIV,tMI planb ,;in,J uti'lltl" 111• Hital C,:,,.llnllJ8 (U Ir'"" 11b::o1YD1 ..... flt IOOlllr"9111>71~M IJOl',fl fram ooru•l Gf IIM)t1 lnvJ111MI planl1. 1Jndd~1:ibll oi111I• 'rli:.!udo bt~dlllll'T!N, $ai!.'G b1011m, linty ~Wlll1, rlld gnatygf'IIII, and Jbl'U illltd 1n·tM, w'ohlnijtllll SUit NO'd0U11 Wood U&l l. Wll'\lfl 111• 111,lored lll'lcl 11111111,C,9!1 Wllll•ndlhs lll"Oj&i:.l lllologl~t 11t1al\cll(JII\ Jhe numblll'OI cl11lt1~ "'Ol'.ln18'!1r' pl•rit:1 and uum,le \l'lfl .. ,,... C'CMH'SGI OI IMHII P"'nlL ", The Jrof!Ct bl010Q11l l!IIIR U.ll:11 p,,otg9i,pt,a Ll\lll ""°"" tt1~ m...i.r,,, G'llfllpcn111\o,y 111IOgallan ..... O<Jrlng lhfl IIV•~PI mor,IIDrll'III paNld llhtl!D! 111~11 bl !Oen II\ l1'19 Ul!lt.Clr1c!IPI\ •r,cl ., Iha G~mf' IOC~l\on IO prtivld• • ~rlaG i,t ptrO!OII,. TI•••"' pl\otoa ~1111 snaw pla!'II growth, 11lo.nl 1101(le,, lllld pl11n\ Covora;11. &. Upon Ult coffl11l11•bn al ._ct, arYW~ mor,llar1nv plll'iod 1h, pre/tel blDloQl1l 1J\III• p111p••• a r,:po'ft · dllftl'\IIIQ ITl•l~Oc!I, 11t>::lorr.,tbn1, .111d '"1111, ::ilolli:, With tllt dOJt 11'11 ObHI\IIIIDIII ""9" tciinp!atad. Each r,epDI\ . 1~11111• prQIAd!Jd to 0. CDl.lnl.Y. ,• A. bf!Ca 9 HOC RttJ\'A yup fgljowlr,g lb• egmplcitlan of fnltlal 1>nmll1 pl1nrlng. -~or 1111th 1'110,,lollllD Y!H, tw1R• lr'lonl\oling ,.aUd D!l ,;om?iOllld anew Mil}' !I\ lll•OfO'l/111§ IHUfl (llltt Mlrt~ ti> mid,.Apr11) 1i,d c,,aa :i.11:i!n near lhl •~ of\he 9~11"111 .-inon 1rnro.a1pl1,nt:,Q,\ ~ar 1111cn or,s/ta rru,111111~1111 ;,:11wlty :in ll!lft\JIII Npol\-1111' Do pNpllF'ld and provtd,dto l<IIICI C!lu"tywUllin_lllM wtlkl 1ruir111e eompl1Uan d Lila l1l l'l11nltiffl'III. • , . . . a. Or,Cll: • JF'tf (pC WICI \hctr J:9Yr !nil UY! l9llrtln, fflt com,i•mn Df l"IIIJ.1 "lll!il" bl,nllM, !!or O~l mot11!Dl1ng )'IIIT, a .. 11r mar,11Drl1111 "'IV\lld b1 ca~ltl1d 111\C!J ""'lh'l lllld r,1111, 91"C1Wtng nncn (mid• ao,c1t11'll<1r). Fc,r uch C7'11b mor,-O!lng aeM1 • 111otll't -.Id be inP'l't., and p1DV10111 \111(111; co~ ""'lhl" fll,H Mllltll •flllrltlD o;,mp.bO'i:ri d 11n1oh ma"1talfno. • Vo11rUtlon l'ltfln111:1tl11n 8111,rar,cl"" MONrTOAUIC, "'AH.T COMMUNfT'Y lllONrTDRING $UDMITTAL OF MONITOflilNG YEAR Rl!PORl V~R•1 011 Of 111101,,\.A.Otll 15 2lltU 011 •• lllllul B11nL ,Ii-llli:I~ A111on IIUII Otl, T 2<l05 YIJ\R•2 onor1101111I 1 ,o ,ooa o" 111 "b!IUI Soct. t!t JOOt R~non o:"" 0,1. ,~ 'l'EI\~-~ Or, ..,.•Driul 1.en1. I~ 20l'lT Rt"II 01,.11!,0et 7 lD07 Tl,,\A, ... 011 Dt'IIICIUI IDOi, ,~ woe RID~r\ llul OCL 7 200 V'£,\A..~ 11r mtiOOl Sci L 1!. 2001 R~nol\ (f1o1 Ott. 7 JOOl ~l:OETA'fl"N MJ\.IHTEt'AMCE. PLAN M•..,1•~1mc:13 of 11'11 IHfo111d ind IM11nc11d wall•nd '"~T be' ~quirtd lo Hl\11'11 !lit lani",..,, haat11\ ~,.cl· llftl1flr. of 11'111 wa\11n~on~lt11~1Ml'll.:Jt Rl,ctio~t. SI.KIi m•lnw,,ni:.1 wou111 bo kknlllitd dllln; IM monlc.-lrlg p1rlad ..,c1 Ul\dcl"!aktn only fallowing dl~tt.lliJlol\ ind coan:llnalion wlll Klno C~only, 'T?l<l avm:ill DbfotlNC I~ Ld •~t~bl,h IJtUlll\ufb•d plon1 cciminulllll~ U,;a\ do nol l'IQU(l't ffl&ll'lt'!nanu. AGll~nie, ~ W:lijdl, bl.II 1~ Ml 11rn111d lo, 1n1111a(llonl o, i'lv,ar.o, 11on-n1IN1 I/WOllt\/1111 •11d f'lll lr1li;11lor1 af ~tl!tled 1r111. £51-blJ:it-d 1na11111111anco ic11v1U11l11~11hcl r,mD¥alof11ny ~sh wllNr, lht we~snd or ou1r•ir, l'IEMQVAL OF INVi!»IVll flOH-N,\TIVE VEl;f;TA1'10N Al .1 c1111lll\l'.lltll~, .~ lh:reitti!Y:11 al lt111urwe 11on,n1llir1 v~gat,11lla11 b1ccmo 11c~•~,Y'fl'llh1n ,,..., rtelo"IIC! and cnhlffll:.r:d W"Ctb!\CI INl, lt\11 praJ•t1 propan1n1 ~hall CD'\!~11 l(!no County lo llll~•II pnd dafiria tpacrk ~c,lonl to o,e l•k~"--Aasul1ar,1 con\hganq, pliH\ :,el.il,IU"~ •I'~~ 11 .. 1mpr1mant110 v,1111:, lhG onaa111a ""ll!'ltilo~ 11'10rlto11nij pnigran1 lrld~!et tllll 011r,t1 n,t~d 111 In'!' w-,.,1.,p1an S1;111: Nolrlov~ Weed LIit, bl~dibnnias, r .. d ,,.,,~1')9/'!IU, 11, &er, trroa111 a~ bocornlno do"""'nt W\ U'II u'!lmunH~ rx IJ'!INd 1;~ of lhe ll!'fl!ll 00\lu,ae ol en.. planll11p-~ ,,l!OING FQA f.XPCIEDAREA.8 su11r19 rgr al o!IZIOled-1u1FtC1J, Y4nin IM 1t1~1t111tor, 11,., ~h•II ba i;D,nplctcd v,lihln two ""9111'1 ra11o....i~g u,, lll)UUl'I or In• ,o•. Wlt!llnn Arn Soll Mor11vr~ condlllol\l '" 11•r foitai /~ ICV/\IJ 1111wi.1,,i (~olr al Iha r.ilc of ,ic 0011~0; p~r acrT) U11la11d Qulft1 ~,.,. San Ma1,w ..... Cat1dlt1<in; c1>m.,,or, MIii" ~~1ontrnt "i"'i: .. u:Mb ,.,,.1 111 SE 1.361h STREET c-:39 ... [2.PYf' "" I I \ HUMDI! ,.... 4 ,· 1 ,, ' " ' " 20 4~~1o1P, 6,o,f:t)1f; ~t.01 COMMON NlME ,c:IErrrnfiC HAM( ( I PAGE 02 UNAVC ~TDCR ,....,,~l225s, 2-PI& 10.cos 20•SAS CLASS 2 WETLAND fDIW~=-~,i, • ' &4°" 0 iti:;:i:J., .-. ESTA8LISHE[ ""'. · · BUFFER ···-al.I. r9';;u~--BOUNOARY- LOCAitON OF ~ AND F'INAL PF/( BUFFER SIG ATTACHED I soc ® .. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 August 10, 2006 .. Page I of I Summary of Charges and Payments --'--------------· Activity Number: Applicant: $19,162 WETL PERF Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Description Non,Cash Bond Deposit'.. •.· . / •:: ! :r SUB TOTAL CHARGES: Checklogid . Payee . . . $19,162.\VETL PER1' SUB TOTAL PAYMENTS: BALANCE: A04BN275 L01P0016 BOND RECEIVED Amount . $19,162.00 $19,162.00 ($19,162.00) $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DDES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before ODES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. Environmental Consultants 35316 28th Avenue South lderal Way, Washington 98003 :-r,..\·(L·.-E'.J'. /,,'-' PM .., "' a, ~ 17 A;;: 200'>~ -- Nick Gillen Environmental Scientist Ill King County DOES 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, Washington 98055 :::::-:--e~. . . ....._ , 1 _____ -. ==------=~ ·--·~~ ----=@?rrffs.....; .: ----~ - :..,,·~ c:., U1 c)·o ::,..-.., ·:..·~-~~ ,. J .. ::-: ,.__ _! ~-,._ :-) I ' '• ;~~~~ • .l -,J .-r .. ;<,~ ·--~ . J :.,-_, -._) < r·,-, (~ [Tl 00 C) i. "'3,~0.~"S-lt-'\. ~ '\. ~ 11, I,, I .. I, II u,, I, I,, I, I .. , ,11 .. I, I,,, 111, I,, 1 ,I,, I, I,,,, I, II ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oaksdale A venue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 August 27, 2004 Kurt Wilson SB! Development PO Box 7390 Puyallup, WA 98373 ,,-• \_ ,I -.. , RE: Subject: Financial Guarantee Activity Number A04BN275 (L04GI143) Sensitive Area Mitigation Dear Mr. Wilson: As you may know, there is a Sensitive Area Mitigation financial guarantee associated with permit LOJPOOJ6, which requires monitoring. Prior to initial monitoring, the financial guarantee must be posted with the Department. If you have not already done so, please contact Stacy Graves (206-296-7009) at your earliest convenience. The purpose of this letter is to provide you with information about the monitoring process, a county monitoring staff contact, and to inform you of King County hourly fees associated with the monitoring activity. Permit conditions required that the mitigation area satisfy approved p !an p erforrnance goals and standards of success by the end of the monitoring period. Monitoring and maintenance will need to be performed on this site throughout the monitoring period to comply with permit conditions. Typically you can expect an installation inspection, follow-up reviews of the monitoring report and site visits if questions arise and a final inspection at the end of the monitoring period. Attached is a copy of the bond monitoring guidelines to further explain the process. Typically, such maintenance includes watering and control of invasive, non-native, brush and weeds. All documents and future monitoring reports should be submitted under the bond number (above) to enable us to monitor the progress of your project and ensure approval of the release of your financial guarantee at or before the end of the performance monitoring period. An activity has been established to track the monitoring activities. Monitoring and maintenance verification inspections will be conducted on an as needed/annual basis by ihe Department of Development and Environmental Section (DDES) staff to ensure your project is progressing toward satisfying the success criteria. Fees will be charged at the annual current billing rate (2004+ rate is $144.90 per hour) for staff time associated with all work done in conjunction with monitoring, inspection, permit compliance, and release of financial guarantees. Please reference your activity number and provide a copy of this correspondence when remitting payment to our finance office located in the main reception area on the first floor at DDES. These fees must be paid before the rel.ease of the financial guarantee. ·--·----- . I Kurt Wilson August 27, 2004 Page2 --./ If you have any questions regarding this process please contact me within (30) thirty days at 206-296-6764 or lisa.brandt@metrokc.gov. Sincerely,~ Lisa Environmental Scientist II Critical Areas Section Enclosure cc: File .. .. BOND REQUIREMENT NOTIFICATION Date: . 40 tJ,/O'f TO: Financial Guarantees Management Unit FM: Critical Areas Section RE: Activity/l'roject# · Lo%/?o2-'/ -t, o;?oo/ 6 The application referenced above has been approved. The bonds listed below are required for this project. Applicant · 5 B '£ [) ft.,f;{_(} PMf}vZ: Ku1<T W11-s:0H Po 8~x 7?9o Bond Type (~s/Streams/Geology/Wildlife) Bond Amount · Performance f9'. Maintenance D # Years Monitoring ___ S ____ _ Initial Bond Fee /.J b IL, ~. ,,,.,- FGMU Bond Activity# &a Z/6 N;J?o j.._Ot/G£ Jt/3 Please return this notification with the appropriate copies of the bond fonns and initial bond fee amount that was sent the applicant, to Critical Areas Section. cc: File @ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Kurt Wilson SBI Developing, LLC PO Box 73790 Puyallup, WA 98373 ,, RE: Financial Guarantee Requirements DDES File Number: L01P0016 Project Title: Evendell Dear Mr. Wilson: October 13, 2005 The Financial Guarantee Unit has received notification from the Land Use Inspection Section that the above referenced project will require a maintenance/defect financial guarantee posted prior to issuance of the final construction approval. Once all construction-related items have been completed, please contact me to obtain your financial guarantee forms. I can be reached at 206-296-7009. Sincerely, . )Jf~&oJe5 Stacy Graves Financial Guarantee Coordinator cc: Steven C. Townsend, P.E., Supervising Engineer, Land Use Inspection Section ATTN: Tim Cheatum, Engineer Financial Guarantee Unit SELECTi:,D COMPENSATORY MITIGATION APPROACH Site planning for the Evendell R,;sidential Community has focused on the mandated. hierarchy of wetland impact reduction: 1) avoidance, 1) minimization, and 3) compensation. These avoidance and minimization strategies included a site design Jo avoid all adverse impacts to onsite wetland systems, except those minor impacts required by King County to create SE 136 1" Street. The total amount of King County jurisdictional wetland area to be modified by UtG development of SE 136° Street equals 225 square feet (0.005 acres). As compensation for this unavoidable impact 550 square feet (0.012 ac.res) of degraded wetland area would be restored and enhanced through lite planting of na(ive trees and shrubs. In addition, Tract P would be added to the overall protective buffer established by this mitigation program. This compensatory action has been reviewed and approved by King County environmental staff. • Mitigation Benefits The restoration and enhancement of the northern tip of the existing Class 2 Wetland is designed to accompany site development. The primary benefits associated with the proposed restoralion and enhancement includes the creation of a viable plant com11iunity composed of native shrubs and trees. The selected plant species would increase plant community and wildlife habitat diversity and complexity within the wetland area. The restored and enhanced wetland area would provide increased screening protections for the wetland area adjacent with the new public roacl~1ay. In addition, the addition of Tract P to the overall established buffer would provide increased protection for the onsite wetland and additional retained ~Jildlife habitats. • Selected Mitigation Area The selected mitigation area is located at the northern tip of the onsite Class 2 Wetland. The plant community within the selected area is presently limited as a result of prior land use actions. DESCRIPTION OF THE MITIGATION PROGRAM 1. As compensation for the unavoidable filling of 225 square feet (0.005 acres) of identified King County Class 2 Wetland the area directly south of the impacted wetland area shall be restored and enhanced through the planting of a variety of native trees and shrubs. The area to be restored shall be a minimum of 550 square feet (0.012 acres) in size. The selected species shall increase plant community and wildlife habitats diversity and complexity. 2. As compensation for the reduced buffer caused by the developrnenl of SE 1361" Street along the northern edge of the identified King County Class 2 Wetland the existing forested area in the northeastern corner of the project site (Tract P) shall be added to the overall buffer area. 3. All onsite activities shall be monitored by the project biologist. Following the completion of onsite planting activities a "record-drawing" (i.e. "as-built") plan shall be prepared and submitted to King County. A five-year monitoring program shall be undertaken to assure the success of the compensatory mitigalion program. 4. Ternporary and long-term erosion control measures shall be implemented. These measures include silt fencing during site preparalion and welland planting, and seeding of all exposed soil areas, 5. The retained wetland and associated buffer shall be identified as separate tract. The outer boundary of this tract shall be fenced and posted with standard King County buffer boundary signs at a minimum interval of 50 feet. GOAL AND OBJECTIVE OF THE MITIGATION PROGRAM The GOAL of the corr1pensatory rnitigation program is to fully compensate for the unavoidable adverse impact to Wetland A caused by the required development of SE 1361" Street. The restoration and enhancement of a portion of the onsite wetland shall provide full compensation for unavoidable wetla~d impacts. Upon the completion of this mitigation plan there shall be no net loss of wetland functions or values. To achieve the defined GOAL, the-following OBJECTIVES and PERFORMANCE CRITERIA have are defined: Objective A. The restored and enhanced compensatory mitigation area shaH be a_ rninimurn of 550 square feet (0.012 acres) in total size. The restored and enhanced compensatory m_1t1g~ti_o_n wella~d area shall exhibit a scrub/shrub and sapling tree vegetation classes within five years following 1n1t1al planting. Performance Criterion #A1: As defined by plant count 100°/, of the trees and shrubs initially installed within the compensatory wetland arEJa shall exhibit surviva.1 through ltte end of the first growing season following· planting. Performance Criterion #A2: As defined by plant count 80°/, of the trees and shrubs initially installed within the compensatory wetland area shall exhibit survival through the end of the fifth growing season following planting. Performance Criterion #A3: As defined by aerial coverage, invasive non-native species shall not exceed· 15o/o at the end of Ihe fiflh growing season following planling within the restored and enhanced .. compensatory wetland area. IMPLEMENTATION INSPECTION Essential to the success of the rnitigation program.is the accurate inspection of onsite activities immediately . prior to and during the initial wetland restoration and enhancement phase. These activities include pre- implementation site inspection, onsite inspection and technical direction during wetland planting act1v1!Jes, and . post-planting site inspection and evaluation. · The pre-irnplernentation site inspection allows the project team and the project biologist to evaluate and, if necessary, undertaken rninor adjustments in the onsite implementation steps. These steps include _analysis of project site elevation features, project sequencing and timing, final grade analysis, unforeseen r_equ1red minor modifications to the original establishment plan, and the establ1shrnent of environmental protections (silt . fences, etc.) required during implementation. Onsite technical inspection during implementation and planting activities shall be implemented by the project biologist. The project biologist shall perform 1mplernentat1on oversight and address minor unforeseen implementation difficulties to assure that the intent of the . compensatory mitigation program is met. The. project biologist shall also be responsible for ensuring thal the species and sizes of native plants selected and noted within the final planting plan are utilized during implerrientation. If selected native species become unavailable, the project biologist shall consult with King County for substitute plant species to assur~ that the intent of the compensatory mitigation program is met. Post-implementation site inspection/ evaluation shall include the preparation of a "record-drawings" which shall be submitted to King County. . . CONTINGENCY PLAN As a contingency, should the proposed compensatory mitigation prograrn fail to meet the performance criteria, the project proponent shall undertake required remedial actions. Where plant survival is the failing component, the project proponent shall replant and ensure the success of this second planting which would be held to the same standard of success as measured by threshold criteria and rnonitoring processes. Where non-native, invasive vegetation exceeds 15% aerial coverage the project proponent s~all undertake removal actions. Such removal actions shall be completed using hand tools or pulling the plants by hand to remove the invasive vegetation without disrupting the soil profile. All cut or pulled vegetation shall be removed. from the mitigation area and disposed in an approved location. Herbicides shall only be used following approval by King County. All herbicide application shall be completed by a licensed professional. Should additional remedial actions be required, the project proponent shall meet with the King County to · establish and define actions to be taken to meet the desired goal of this mitigation program. TEMPORARY IRRIGATION The project proponent shall ensure that a minimum of one (1) inch of water is supplied each week to the compensatory mitigation area between June 1 and October 1.5 for a least the first two years following initial planting. The calculated amount of required water shall include both natural rainfall and temporary irrigation. The need for additional years of irrigation shall be determined based on site conditions and overall plant survival. The amount of water supplied to the compensatory mitigation area shall be increased if onsite monitoring defines such a need. PLANTING NOTES With the exception of the identified grass seed mixtures, all plant materials utilized within the restore and eni)anced wetland shall be native to the Puget Sound Region. The onsite biologist shall inspect plant materials to assure the appropriate plant schedule and plant characteristics are met. The project proponent shall . . . . . . .ll,ll.l.l.!I. "!1tlllivitiss,,01il<!oopl"!lje~ISonent shall replace all dead and unhealthy plants with plants of the same specifications. IMPLEMENTA'f!ON SCHEDULE PROJECT TASK lementation project meeting · Placement of protective fencing, final marking, and identification of work area. Seedin of disturbed areas. lrri ation of restored and enhanced wetland. Plantin of restored and enhanced wetland area. PROJECT MONITORING TASK SCHEDULE Com feted b Au . 15, 2004 Cornpleted by Aug. 30, 2004 As needed followin seedin Com leted b Nov. 15, 2004 Com feted b Dec. 5, 2004 Following the successful completion of the proposed wetland planting a five-year monitoring and evaluation prograin shall be undertaken. The purpose of this program is to ensure the, success of the selected mitigation as measured by an established set of performance criteria. This monitoring may also provide valuable information on the effectiveness of mitigation procedures. STANDARDS OF SUCCESS • Vegetation Sampling Methodology and Monitoring Schedule The monitoring program shall count each plant initially installed within the restored and enhanced wetland area. The evaluation of the success of the compensatory mitigation program shall .be based on the selected survival rate for trees and shrubs. These defined performance criteria shall be applied at lhe times of yearly monitoring. The percent survival rate shall be based on combined counts of existing, volunteer plants, and planted species during vegetation monitoring. Sample location shall be shown on the "record drawings" (i.e. "as-built") plan, and shall correspond to identified photopoinls. Trees and shrubs shall be visually evaluated to determine the rate of survivorship, health, and vigor of eacti plant. The categories to be used shall include live, slressed, tip dieback, basal sprouts, not found, apparently dead, and dead. • Vegetation Monitoring 1. As a part of each monitoring period the project biologist shall count the number of live plants initially planted within the representative sample plots. Plants shall be identified to species and observations of general plant condition (i.e., plant health, amount of new growth) shall be recorded for each plant. 2. · Within the restored and enhanced welland the project biologist shall count the number of undesirable invasive plants and estirr1ate the aerial coverage (as if the observer were looking straight down from above) of these invasive plants. Undesirable plants include blackberries, Scot's broom, tansy ragwort, reed canarygrass, and plants listed in lhe Washington State Noxiou·s Weed List. 3. Within the restored and enhanced wetland the project biologist shall count the number of desirable "volunteer" plants and estimate the aerial coverage of these plants. 4. The project biologist shall take photographs that show the entire compensatory mitigation area. . During the five-year monitoring period photos shall be taken in the same direction and at the same location to provide a series of photos. These photos shall show plant growth, plant species, and plant coverage. 5. . . Upon the completion of each annual monitoring period the project biologist shall prepare a report def1n1ng methods, observations, and results along with the date the observations were completed. Each report . shall be provided lo the County. 6. The rr1onitoring schedule is defined as: A. Twice a year for two years following the complet!on of initial onsite planting. For each rnonitoring year, onsite monitoring would be completed once early in the growing season (late March to mid-April) and once again near the end of the growing season (mid-September). For each onsite rnonitoring activity an annual report would be prepared and provided to King County •Nithin three weeks after the completion of the fall monitoring. B. Once a year for years three, four, and five following the completion of initial onsite planting. For each monitoring year, onsite monitoring would be completed once near the end of the growing season (mid- Septernber). For each onsite monitoring activity a report would be prepared and provided to King County w1th1n lhree weeks after the completion of onsite monitoring. Vegetation Monitoring Sequencing MONITORING PLANT COMMUNITY MONITORING SUBMITTAL OF MONITORING YEAR REPORT YEAR-1 On or about Anril 15, 2005 On or about Sept. 15, 2005 Report due Oct. 7, 2005 YEAR-2 On or about April 15, 2006 On or about Seat. 15, 2006 Report due Oct. 7, 2006 YEAl,-3 On or about Sept. 15, 2007 Report due Oct. 7, 2007 YEAR-4 On or about Sept. 15, 2008 Report due Oct. 7, 2008 YEAR-5 On or about Sent. 15, 2009 Reoort due Oct. 7, 2009 VEGETATION MAINTENANCE PLAN Maintenance of the restored and enhanced wetland may be required to assure the long-term health and welfare of the wetland's environmental functions. Such maintenance would be identified during the monitoring period and undertaken only following discussion and coordination with King County. The overall objective is to establish undisturbed plant communities that do not require maintenance. Activities may include, but are not limited to, the removal of invasive non-native vegetation and the irrigation of selected areas. Established maintenance activities include the removal of any trash within the wetland or buffer. REMOVAL OF INVASIVE NON-NATIVE VEGETATION As a contingency, should the removal of invasive non-native vegetation become necessary within the restored and enhanced wetland area, the project proponent shall contact King County to establish and define specific actions to be taken .. Resultant contingency plan aclivities shall be implemented when the ongoing vegetation monitoring program indicates that plants listed in the Washington State Noxious Weed List, blackberries, reed canarygrass, or Scot's broom are becoming dominant in the community or exceed 15°/, of the aerial coverage of the planting areas. SEEDING FOR EXPOSED AREAS Seeding for all exposed·surfaces within the mitigation area shall be completed within two weeks following the exposure of the soil. Wetland Area Soil Moisture Conditions common name scientific narne percent by wei ht I edtop arostis alba 50% ater foxtail /oaecurus aenicu/atus 50% (apply at the rate of 120 pounds per acre) Upland Buffer Area Soil Moisture Conditions common name scientific narne · percent by weight Colonial bentorass arostis tenuis 15°/o Tall fescue estuca arundinacea 40°/o Perennial rvearass . o!ium nerenne 30°/o Creee ina red fescue estuca rubra 15°/o ( apply at the rate of 120 pounds per acre) I SE 136th STREET UNAVOIDABLE WETLAND FILL TO CREATE PUBLIC ROADWAY (225sqft) c---~ 0~ '-:: V~,-• 2-PIS • .. t ·. • , \ ' 10-COS , , \ • , 20-SAS ' L , ' ' I ' NUMBE ~ CLASS 2 WETLAND \ 4 2 COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME PROPUSED SPACIN\,,_ (oc) "-s PROPOSED . SIZE estern red cedar (THP) · 1 O fl ~lf_ieight ~ uia nlicata m ,mum itk pruce (PIS) 10 ft 4 ft h' ·ght t---·;---~.:.P.cic::,'e,::a,_ itchensis • minim 4 ouglas fll\{PSM) ·1 O fl 4 fl height,_ Pseudotsuaa menziesii . minimum \ 12 estern crabaJ'R!e 8 ft 4 fl height I\. INDICATOR STATUS. FAG FAC FACU FACW Pvrus fusca "-minimum I \ 3 lack twinberry "-s 4 ft 2 gal \_FAC+ Lonicera }nvo/ucrata , \_ G;· -l~a;;;cifiific;:';;n if;;n~ebi:::a;';r\;'k ==~';:"' "-s-. -+--c4·'°'nc--+---c2c---g a.,-1 --t---.cF"'A'=crsw"'"----1 Phvsocarnus caoitatus "· • 10 ed osier dogwood \ Cornus stolonifera 4 ft 2 gal FACW~ I I I ~ 0 \ scale in feet I PEE FF Irr 20 40 60 80 !?'."l TRACT P ADDED BUFFl:.R AREA \ \ \ ESTABLISHED BUFFER BOUNDARY--..... 20 itka willow Salix sitchensis 4 ft \ 2 gal FACVV DEFINED WETLAND B UNDARY C ~.~~-llNG BACKFlll: 50M .E)(!511NO 50U., BM I/ MINUS 00!,jPOS]',' Ml){!ll 'i){QhOUaliL.Y . . \ • \ ,2. FOR t.4ULai TrPE SEE . I.AJiOSOAPE MOJE~ ,___. COIJml lll£E . ' .,t 3, If ~11ta MlO IIUR!..AJ-1 11 . Oli!EH IN COLOR. Rc:MO ' OOMPL(!Ji[Y BEFOl!E . IHSTAU.INO Pl.ANT. · · SHRUB PLANT/N(,' nFTAII 2x2 STN<E DRl\ai . . INTO SUBGfMlf/Jl . SE\lUREJ, TO 1REE W/ • MURS!R •• • TAPE · FOR~ SAUCER ~]H 1:otrnNUOOS RIM MULC/i "TOSSOIL OR ESTABLISHED AMENDED BA!}~. fl!£FER . TO LS MOTES FOR ( .. ·· · BUFFFR !EN El&B: fiEMOVE AU. I, AND ROLL BURLAP ·soUNDARY Off· OF TOP OF · . ROOtBA!J.- LQCAT!QN OF SILT FENCE AND FINAL PROTECTIVE FENC BUFFER SIGNS TO BE A·rTACHED EVERY 25 FEE·r ~ffi\!B3 ~uffi\u u~~[}=1J[N](Q)[L(Q)@~~ 3. IF El&B AND BURLAP 1S GRl:EN It{ COL.Oil, ~EMOVE . · CDMPLflELY BEfOf:U! INSTALlJN~ Pl.ANT. • . · """"~) \ I "' \ ............ \ ---- I --.................._ __ w {/) w :::> z w ~ .c -0 <..O \ -- REVISIONS BY Date MAY 2004 scale AS SHOWN Drawn T.DEMING Job 04065 Sheet \ Of \ Sheets ';) /,. i ' ' '' • ' ) . \• ._ ( -j,fj-·IJ'S:° ~ltt.lr?. 1'_-\1t 1.,: .-·.'11·,.c. ',''/ (.f.,, .. ,,- ,---------------------------~------------------~1::M:P;:';"L':'.E::'M';E;::N~T;:".A~'-=r,:-:o::'N:-:-'.S::'C:::':"H:":E::D:":".U::'L":E:---=---~---:----------------------,-------------------------------------------------•----------';.;,;;e,;_~,;.'C-\_-____ ,.,' .. "-;;,,,., C,;_-;.'_';-' .. l .. >' ... _(..;\l_._,-,,,;\,O;;_·,;_:..,..;s;,;i_'_'_C,_C_._,. __ ,,..,/I ,-G--·_R-':'-v-;..:~!..;-:-:-·~-'1.,;''e,-B.cly_ro,-!,,,,,.'r,/"'r:'1: SELEC"fED COMPENSATORY MITIGATION APPROACH Site planning for the Evendell Rosidentiai Community has focused on the mandated hierarchy of wetland impact reduction: 1) avoidance, 2) minimization, and 3) compensation. These avoidance and minimization strategies included a site design lo avoid all adverse impacts to onsite wetland systems, except those minor impacts required by King County to create SE 1361h Street. The total amount of King County jurisdictional wetland area to be modified by the development of SE 136th Street equals 225 square feet (0.005 acres). As compensation for this unavoidable impact 550 square feet (0.012 acres) of degraded wetland area would be restored and enhanced through the planting of native trees and shrubs. In addition, Tract P would be added to the overall protective buffer established by this mitigation program. This compensatory action has been reviewed and approved by King County environmental staff. • Mitigation Benefits The restoration and enhancement of the northern tip of the existing Class 2 Wetland is designed to accompany site development. The primary benefits associated with the proposed restoration and enhancement includes the creation of a viable plant community composed of native shrubs and trees. The selected plant species would increase plant corr1munity and wildlife habitat diversity and complexity within the wetland area. The restored and enhanced wetland area would provide increased screening protections for the wetland area adjacent with the new public roadway. In addition, the addition of Tract P to the overall established buffer would provide increased protection for the onsite wetland and additional retained wildlife habitats. • Selected Mitigation Area The selected mitigation area is located at the northern tip of the onsite Class 2 Wetland. The plant community within the selected area is presently limited as a result of prior land use actions. DESCRIPTION OF THE MITIGATION PROGRAM 1. As compensation for the unavoidable filling of 225 square feet (0.005 acres) of identified King County Class 2 Wetland the area directly south of the impacted wetland area shall be restored and enhanced through the planting of a variety of native trees and shrubs. The area to be restored shall be a minimum of 550 square feet (0.012 acres) in size. The selected species shall increase plant community and wildlife habitats diversity and complexity. 2. As compensation for the reduced buffer caused by the development of SE 1361h Street along the northern edge of the identified King County Class 2 Wetland the existing forested area in the northeastern corner of the project site (Tract P) shall be added to the overall buffer area. 3. All onsite activities shall be monitored by the project biologist. Following the completion of onsite planting activities a "record-drawing" (i.e. "as-built") plan shall be prepared and submitted to King County. A five-year monitoring program shall be undertaken to assure the success of the compensatory mitigation program. 4, Temporary and long-tern, erosion control measures shall be implemented. These measures include silt fencing during site preparation and wetland planting, and seeding of all exposed soil areas. 5. The retained wetland and associated buffer shall be identified as separate tract. The outer boundary of this tract shall be fenced and posted with _standard King County buffer boundary signs at a minirnum interval of 50 feet. GOAL AND OBJECTIVE OF THE MITIGATION PROGRAM The GOAL of the compensatory rnitigation program is to fully compensate for the unavoidable adverse impact to Wetland A caused by the required development of SE 136'" Street. The restoration and enhancement of a portion of the onsite wetland shall provide full compensation for unavoidable wetla~d impacts. Upon the completion of this mitigation plan there shall be no net loss of wetland functions or values. To achieve the defined GOAL, the following OBJECTIVES and PERFORMANCE CRITERIA have are defined: Objective A. The restored and enhanced compensatory mitigation area st1aH be a minimum of 550 square feet (0.012 acres) in total s_ize. The restor~d and enhanced compensatory rn_1t1gat1_o_n wetland area shall exhibit a scrub/shrub and sapling tree vegetation classes w1th1n five years following 1n1t1al planting. Performance Criterion #A1: As defined by plant count 100°/o of the trees and shrubs initially installed within the compensatory wetland area shall exhibit surviva,I through the end of the first growing season following· planting. Performance Criterion #A2: As defined by plant count 80°/o of the trees and shrubs initially installed within · the compensatory wetland area shall exhibit survival through the end of the fifth growing season following plan· g. Performa 15o/o at e Criterion #A3: As defined by aerial coverage, invasive non-native species shall not exceed he end of the fifth growing season following planting within the restored and enhanced , . atory wetland area. IMPLEMENTATION INSPECTION Essential to the success of the rnitigation program.is the accurate inspection of onsite activities immediately . prior to and during the initial wetland restoration and enhanceme_nt phase. These activities include pre- implementation site inspection, onsite inspection and technical d1rect1on dunng wetland planting act1v1t1es, and post-planting site inspection and evaluation. · The pre-implementation site inspection allows the project team and the project biologist to evaluate and, if necessary, undertaken rninor adjustments in the onsite implementation steps. These steps include _analysis of project site elevation features, project sequencing and timing, final grade analysis, unforeseen required minor modifications to the original establishment plan, and the establishment of environmental protections (silt . fences, etc.) required during implementation. Onsite technical inspection during implementation and planting activities shall be implemented by the project biologist. The project biologist shall perform 1mplementat1on oversight and address minor unforeseen implementation difficulties to assure that the intent of the . compensatory mitigation program is met. The. project biologist shall also be responsible for ensuring that the species and sizes of native pl~nts selected and noted within the final planting plan are utilized during implementation. If selected native species become unavailable, the project biologist shall consult with King County for substitute plant species to assure that the intent of the compensatory mitigation program is met. Post-implementation site inspection/ evaluation shall include the preparation of a "record-drawings" which shall be submitted to King County. CONTINGENCY PLAN As a contingency, should the proposed compensatory mitigation prograrn fail to meet the performance criteria, the project proponent shall undertake required remedial actions. Where plant survival is the failing component, the project proponent shall replant and ensure the success of this second planting which would be held to the same standard of success as measured by threshold criteria and monitoring processes. Where non-native, invasive vegetation exceeds 15°/o aerial coverage the project proponent shall undertake removal actions. Such removal actions shall be completed using hand tools or pulling the plants by hand to rernove the invasive vegetation without disrupting the soil profile. All cut or pulled vegetation shall be removed. frorn the mitigation area and disposed in an approved location. Herbicides shall only be used following approval by King County. All herbicide application shall be completed by a licensed professional. Should additional remedial actions be required, the project proponent shall meet witt1 the King County to · establish and define actions to be taken to meet the desired goal of this mitigation program. TEMPORARY IRRIGATION The project proponent shall ensure that a minimum of one (1) inch of water is supplied each week to_ t_he compensatory mitigation area between June 1 and October 15 for a least the first two years following 1n1t1al planting. The calculated amount of required water shall include both natural rainfall and temporary irrigation. The need for additional years of irrigation shall be determined based on site conditions and overall plant survival. The amount of water supplied to the compensatory mitigation area shall be increased if onsite monitoring defines such a need. PLANTING NOTES With the exception of the identified grass seed mixtures, all plant materials utilized within the restore and . enhanced wetland shall be native to the Puget Sound Region. The onsite biologist shall inspect plant matenals to assure the appropriate plant schedule and plant characteristics are met. The project proponent shall · · healthy tor& 12eriod of gne year fnl!owioo comoleUoa of o@otina "a0livimss,,01i!IO!Op,t'1lje~Jllonent shall replace all dead and unhealthy plants with plants of the same specifications. PROJECT TASK · Placement of protective fencing, final marking, and identification of work area. Seedin of disturbed areas. lrri ation of restored and enhanced wetland. Plantin of restored and enhanced wetland area. ort to Count PROJECT MONITORING TASK SCHEDULE Com feted b Au . 15, 2004 Completed by Aug. 30, 2004 Completed b Se t. ·15, 2004 As needed followin seedin Com leted b Nov. 15, 2004 Com leted b Dec. 5, 2004 Following the successful completion of the proposed wetland planting a five-year monitoring and evaluation program shall be undertaken. The purpose of this program is to ensure the-success of the selected mitigation as measured by an established set of performance criteria. This monitoring may also provide valuable information on the effectiveness of mitigation procedures. STANDARDS OF SUCCESS • Vegetation Sampling Methodology and Monitoring Schedule The monitoring program shall count each plant initially installed within the restored and enhanced wetland area. The evaluation oi the success of the compensatory mitigation program shall _be based on the selected survival rate for trees and shrubs. These defined performance criteria shall be applied at the times of yearly monitoring. The percent survival rate shall be based on combined counts of existing, volunteer plants, and planted species during vegetation monitoring. Sample location shall be shown on the "record drawings" (i.e. "as-built") plan, and shall correspond to identified photopoints. Trees and shrubs shall be visually evaluated to determine the rate of survivorship, health, and vigor of each plant. The categories to be used shall include live, stressed, tip dieback, basal sprouts, not found, apparently dead, and dead. • Vegetation Monitoring 1. As a part of each monitoring period the project biologist shall count the number of live plants initially planted within the representative sample plots. Plants shall be identified to species and observations of general plant condition (i.e., plant health, amount of new growth) shall be recorded for each plant. 2. Within the restored and enhanced wetland the project biologist shall count the number of undesirable invasive plants and estimate the aerial coverage (as if the observer were looking straight down from above) of these invasive plants. Undesirable plants include blackberries, Scot's broom, tansy ragwort, reed canarygrass, and plants listed in the Washington State Noxiou·s Weed List. 3, Within the restored and enhanced wetland the project biologist shall count the nurr1ber of desirable "volunteer" plants and estimate the aerial coverage of these plants. 4. The project biologist shall take photographs that show the entire compensatory mitigation area. . During the five-year monitoring period photos shall be taken in the sarne direction and at the same location to provide a series of photos. These photos shall show plant growth, plant species, and plant coverage. 5. . . Upon the completion of each annual monitoring period the project biologist shall prepare a report · def1n1ng methods, observations, and results along with the date the observations were completed. Each report shall be provided to the County. 6. The monitoring schedule is defined as: A. Twice a year fo_r two years following the completion of initial onsite plantirua. For each monitoring year, onsite monitoring would be completed once early in the growing season (late March to mid-April) and once again near the end of the growing season (mid-September). For each onsite monitoring activity an annual report would be prepared and provided to King County within .three weeks after the completion of the fall monitoring. I B. Once a year for years three, four, and five followinR the completion of initial onsite planting. For each monitoring year, onsite monitoring would be completed once near the end of the growing season (mid- --.. ~ .. S epte mbe r) .-E:or-.eacf"'I'" QF't-8 Ha.mo A it0-Ff Ag a a ,:rHvit-y:,a 'l"epo FPwo u let• bi:f"'p·rcrpa recr-a-na ~p rd VKfed 't O 'Kiri 9 ~count y-~~..z=, -------s;- wi thin three weeks after the completion of onsite monitoring. - Vegetation Monitoring Sequencing MONITORING PLANT COMMUNITY MONITORING SUBMITTAL OF MONITORING YEAR REPORT YEAR-1 On or about Anril 15, 2005 On or about Sept. 15, 2005 Report due Oct. 7, 2005 YEAR-2 On or about April 15, 2006 On or about Seot. 15, 2006 Report due Oct. 7, 2006 YEAR-3 On or about Sept. 15, 2007 Report due Oct. 7, 2007 YEAR-4 On or about Sept. 15, 2008 Reoort due Oct. 7, 2008 YEAR-5 On or about Sent. 15, 2009 Report due Oct. 7, 2009 VEGETATION MAINTENANCE PLAN Maintenance of the restored and enhanced wetland may be required to assure the long-term health and welfare of the wetland's environmental functions. Such maintenance would be identified during the monitoring period and undertaken only following discussion and coordination with King County. The overall objective is to establish undisturbed plant communities that do not require maintenance. Activities rnay include, but are not limited to, the removal of invasive non-native vegetation and the irrigation of selected areas. Established maintenance activities include the removal of any trash within the wetland or buffer. REMOVAL OF INVASIVE NON-NATIVE VEGETATION As a contingency, should the removal of invasive non-native vegetation become necessary within the restored and enhanced wetland area, the project proponent shall contact King County to establish and define specific actions to be taken .. Resultant contingency plan activities shall be irnplemented when the ongoing vegetation monitoring program indicates that plants listed in the Washington State Noxious Weed List, blackberries, reed canarygrass, or Scot's broom are becoming dominant in the community or exceed 15% of the aerial coverage of the planting areas. SEEDING FOR EXPOSED AREAS Seeding for all exposed-surfaces within the rnitigation area shall be cornpleted within two weeks following the exposure of the soil. Wetland Area Soil Moisture Conditions common name scientific name percent by wei;Jht edtoo nrostis alba 50% ater foxtail lonecurus neniculatus 50°/o (apply at the rate of 120 pounds per acre) Upland Buffer Area S ·1 M · t e Co ditions 01 OIS ur n common name scientific name percent by weight Colonial bentnrass nrostis tenuis 15% Tall fescue estuca arundinacea 40% Perennial rvenrass . olium nerenne 30°/o Creeoino red fescue estuca rubra 15% (apply at the rate of 120 pounds per acre) SE 136th STREET NU~BE\ COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME . 4 ~stern red cedar (THP) _ uia n/icata .2 it~~uce (PIS) Picea ·itchensis . • 4 ouglas fh\(PSM) Pseudotsuaa rnenziesii 12 esterr, crabaPR!z Pvrus fusca :1 lack twinberry '\. Lonicera involucrata ' ·- 13 acific ninebark "". · Phvsocarnus cani/a/us 'IO ZiJ . ·, ed osier dogwood Cornus stolonifera itka willow Salix si/chensis r.P~Jhww EIACJmu. oon ·E)(ls1mo suu., aw.. 1/ MINUS llOIJ?Oi!T. MIX£'.D 'tl-lQROUOHLY . ' . .2. FOO MULCH TYPE &cE i: . l,ViD~CAPE NOTES, ' ./ ' ~. If S&a AHO E!U/lV.F. . ORW 1H COLOR. !E:MO OOMPAUJLJ;Jf:t:Y a~o/lE . m•r NG PLANT ... U,IUJil TO ll,fPffl ur'~ · UI LiUi<Mj'l ,O!Ea .. , .. MULCJ-1 · TD DEPTH SiP£CJf/1!D IN NOTES r~rnJ CONTIN!JOUS - \ .-··[ ,. I/' I' < \ ' J I _.;,- 0!.:C1,;' / ', 1 ..._, t' , \ 1ji'. /l q':,.iJ 1,-\ ~I--\-•AJ 't UNAVOIDABLE WETL/\J\JD FILL TO CREA-,E PUBLIC Ft()ADWA'f (225sqft) (1_.) :c ,t'-.._[' (.'\-:,, • 2-PIS '( . ' " r .. , , '-,'+i-c--t-10-COS '-~.+"-,,,--,--J-"=:_,,£--20-SAS L' I I ' ~ CLASS 2 WETLAND PROPOSED PROPOSED SPACIN' . SIZE toe) 10 ft ~height m 1mum 10 ft 4 ft h' 'ght minir~t 10 ft 4 ft heigh"\ minlrnum 8 ft 4 ft height rn1n1murn 4 ft 2 gal 4 ft 2 gal 4 ft 2 gal ~ft 2 gal \ ---------. c;t-~'-· C01Jm1 lilfE -:bt2 STAKE DRllJ:tt . . ltHO 5UB[ifl~ i\t~'l~tlt't Ii,1.1'1'£ W/ FORY SALICER \\IJI (:(ll!WILIOOS RIM ( INDICATOR STATUS FAC . FAC FACU \ FACW ~AC+ FAGW- ' FACW~ FACW -·-. -------~ ----- \ •,' < REMovE AU Wm!!: YffjAP ANQ -PLASllC \'fllAP, · R8.IOVE EIURLAP FROM · 'fqf OF R\JDT EIALL IJULCll & ,TOPSOIL Ofl AMENDED f:lASE, RC:FER 10 . s· Nff1ES FOR DEPlH • I I I '~ \ 0 " \ \ \ h ' scale in feel 80 : ! I Fars I iij i iii:mr P '. Pitt 40 60 TRACT P ADDED BUFFER AREA \ \ \ ESTABLISHED BUFFER BOUNDARY~ • ....,--JJ,- ,J)EFINED WETLAND B UNDARY \ \ \ ' \ "' \ \ "--\ • \ ----- I -------------......... __ _ I P· ,. w U) w :) z w ~ ..c -0 (.Q · 51-IRUB PLANTING !1F .. fAII J, !F S&a AND BURL.AF tS GREEN IN COLOR. fJEJ.10\IE .. 00t,!PL£1ELY BEFORE'. IN5TAWNO PI.AWT. . . . · · · ~ (Q) ~ r: I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c::;::, (q p ·' ~ C::::::J ~ @:i d ~ dJ ~ [111[] I I (Q [}:= ~ ~ [111[] ~ ~ dJ [1&[] @:i Date MAY 2004 scale AS SHOWN Drawn T.DEMING Job 04065 Sheel \ Of \ Sheets I i . I I. Site Area (K.C.C. 21A.06.11721: Site area (In square real) Is the gross horizontal area of the project site, lass submerged lands as cleft~ by K.G.C. 2 IA.00.1265, and less t1reas which are requlrad to be dedicate<! on the perimeter of a project sitafor publlc ri9hts--0f-way. Calculation: II. __ __;O,__ __ sguare feet in submerged land (any land below the ordinary high water mark . see K.C.G. 21A.OB.825.) + --""24,,,91i"'3c..._ __ square feet rn perimeter rfghts--0f-11·ay •1,hich will be required to i,e de<licale<l (area 30 feet from cenlel' line ol 1oad) = __ ;;24,,,9,,,93c..._ __ lalal --~666=,239~ Gross horizontal area of the project Site --~24~,91i~3_Total submefged lands and rights--0f-way --~64~1=,24=6 _Site area in square foot NOTE: To oontinuecalculatioris, con·,ert stte area in sqL1are feet to acres by dividing hy 43,560 ___ 1"'2,c,43c... Site area In acres Bas• Densny (K.C.C. 21A.12.030 •. 040 tables): The base density is determined by 1he zone designation(s) for1he lot. 6 du/acre Ill. Allow•ble Dwelling Units and Rounding (K.C.C, 21A,12.010): The base m1mber of dwell I nu \lllils is calculated by multiplying theslt& area by Iha base dsnsity in dwelling units par acia (from K.C.C; 21A.12.030 • .040 lables). --~1=2.4~3~sita aro,1 In acres (-see Section I.) X ___ B~ __ basa density (sea Section 11.) = 74.56 allowallle dwelling units When calculations result in a fraction, the fraction is rounded to the nearest il·hola 111Jmbar8$ follows: 1. Fractlona of .50 or above shall be rounded up; and 2. Fractrom1 below .50 shall be rounded down. IV, Required On-site Recreation Space (K.C.C. 21A.14.180): This section must be<:ompietOO onr; ~ l.ila proposal Is a residential de'talopmant of more than four dwelling units in the UR arid R zones, stand-a!ooo townhouses in ihe NB zone on properly designated Commercial Outside of Center if more then four units, or any mixed u&edevalopmenl W more than four unl!s. Recreation space must be computed by multiplyin9 t11e recreation spl.lW requirement per unit t;pe by the proposed number of soch dwelling units (K.C.C, 21A.14. 180). NOTE: King couniy has the discration to accept a fee in lieu of all or a portion of the required recreation space PEif K.C.C. 21A.14.185. Apartments and lovjnhousesdavalopad at a density greater than eight units per acre, and mixed use must provida recreational space as follows: 90 oquare fool X 130 aquare foot X 170 aquare feel X _____ proposed number of studHJ and one bedroom ullits ___ . __ proposed number of two t:.edroom units _____ propos€d number of three or more bedroom units _____ Recreatioo Spate Requirement = Residenllal suodMslons and townhouses developed at a density of eight units or less per acre mustpruvfde recreatiorial space as follows; 390 square feel X ___ _.,_75,._proposednumberofunits = Mobile home parks shall provide recreational space M follows: 260 5quarefeet X _____ proposednumberofunits"' V. Net Buildable Area lK,C.C. 21A.06.797): This secUon is used for oomputlrig minimum dens!~J and must be completed only if the site Is located In the R-4 through R-48 zonas and designated Urban by the Klng County ComprEhenslve Pfan. The net bulldable area 1slhe site area (see Section I.) !ass thefollov~ng .ireas: Calculation: VI. __ __,Oc_ __ areas wahin a project site which are require<! to be dedicated for public lights-of.way in excess of sixty feet (60') of width + --~f)7.,_'0~>_o __ sensitive areas and lh&ir buffers, to the extent tliey are required by King Count/lo remain undeveloped + __ 4~0"',25==6 ___ areas required for above grouOO stoITT1water control fac:llitlea including, but not limited to, retention/detention ponds, blofiltration S\Va!es and setbacks from such ponds and swales + --"'14"',62==5 ___ areas required by Klng County to be dedicated or reserved as on-site recreation areas. Deduct area within storrmvater control fuclltty a requesting recreation space credit as allowed b~ KCC 21A.14.180, (,ee 8eotlon IV.) + __ __,Oc_ __ regklnal urnity corridors, and + __ __;Oc..... __ other areas, excluding selbacks, rnquired by King County to remain undeveloped = _2 /__,Z."-'l+-'-q'-'/ J __ Total reduction, 541 246 site area in square feel (see Section L) /Z.(. ',// Tolalreducians :: q ;q -3"55 net btJildable area in square feet NOTE: convert site area in square feat to acres by dividing by 43,560 = net lnJi!dable area In acres MinimlJm Urban Re&idenlial Density (K.C.C. 21A.12.060) Th& minimum density requlreroont applies only to the R-4 through R-48zonas. Minimum density is determined by multi plying the base density in dwelling units per aae (see Secl1on II.) by the netbtJlldable area of the site in acres (see Section V.) and then multi~Jing the resulting prodw::t by the minimum density percentage from the KC.C. 21A12.030 @bl!;!. The minimum densi~J requirements may be phc1sed or waivOO by King County in certain cases. &le K.C.C. 21A.12.060. Calcula!on: 6 basa doostty in dulac (see Section II.) X 'j, W: nat buildabta area In acres (see Section V.) ----~ = 57. 7 b X minimum density% set fortil In K.C.C, 21A 12,030 or asadjustad in SJJciion VII. :::: If '1, I minimum d~1alling unils require(J 0 0 0 0 29250 0 APPLICANT: PROJECT MANAGER: SECTION, TOWNSHIP & RANGE: ACREAGE: TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: SFD: TOWNHOUSE: ZONING: PROPOSED USE: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: WATER SYSTEM: SCHOOL DISTRICT: FIRE DISTRICT: TELEPHONE SERVICE: POWER: N/1:fURAL GAS: CABLE T'/: CURRENT PROPOSED EVENDELL PRELIMINARY PLAT SE 1/4 S14-T23N-R5E U.S. Land Development Associates ENGINEER: Hmvard Stansbury/Michael Utt P.O. BQ, 22200 Seattle, WA 98122-0200 (206) 726-1445 Centurion Development Services SURVEYOR: Michael J. Romano 22617-illll Dr. SE. Bolhell, WA 96021 (425)486-2563 75 0 R-4 R-6 SE 114 S14-T23N-R5E 13.00 SINGLE FMIILY RESIDENTIAL CITY OF RENTON KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT #90 RENTONIISSAQUAH KING COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #25 QWEST PUGET SOUND ENERGY PUGET SOUND ENERGY AT&T BROADBAND Haozaus Engineering, P.S. Robert Darrow 1342845th C1. Mukil100, WA 98275 1425) 745-5872 Dryco Survey Larry Sargent 12714 Valley Avanue Easi Sumner, WA 98390 (2531826-0300 100 0 100 200 1. ~ WETLAND FILL = 200 SQ, FT. 2. ~ BUFFER DISTURBANCE A. BY R.O.W. = 4,649 SQ. FT. B. BY LOTS = 9,340 SQ. FT. 3. ~ BUFFER REPLACEMENT/AVERAGING AREA = 15,495 SQ. FT. 4. C:) BUFFER ENHANCEMENT AREA = ±ff:ooo SQ. FT. (IF REQ'D) (TO BE SELECTED BY BIOLOGIST) ' . S.A.T. 0 A. BUFFER AREA = so, o.ae SQ. FT. B. WETLAND AREA = 1G,<162 SQ. FT. PERIMETER ROW AREA = 24,993 SQ. FT. INTERIOR PUBLIC ROAD AREA = 55,509 SQ, FT. INTERIOR PRIVATE ROAD AREA = 17,525 SQ. FT. STORMWATER DETENTION TRACT "N" AREA -4,421 SQ. FT. STORMWATER DETENTION TRACT "M" AREA -35,835 SQ. FT. RECREATION TRACT "L" AREA = 14,871 SQ, FT. AREA OF TRACT "M" OUTSIDE OF 100 YEAR WATER SURFACE LEVEL = 11,808 SQ. FT R-4 't:J Q) ·+..;) ·-w (\; i'c•,,a.'1 ~ t""-1 ""' f--, i,,,.J w V) ~ i .- ~ SE 128TH Sf VICINITY MAP . ',_, -~" LEGAL DESCRIPTION S 136TH ST SITE~ ~ ll) .- ST THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNlY, WASHINGTON: EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AS THE POINT OF TRUE BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00'25'21" EAST 523.99 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88' 07'58" WEST 653.61 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 00'27'05" WEST 525.82 FEET TO THE SOUTH LIME OF .SAID EAST 1-IALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 88'17'35" EAST 653.84 FEEf ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT COUNTY ROADS. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST '1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 156TH AVENUE SE AS DEEDED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 1094243; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE WESTERLY 199 FEET THEREOF, AS MEASURED FROM THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 156TH AVENUE SE, LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF. SITUATE IN THE COUNlY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AMD UTILITIES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE NORTH 15 FEET OF THE WEST 187 FEET (AS MEASURED FROM THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY) OF LOT 2 OF SHORT PLAT NO. 878133, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNlY RECORDING NO. 8002250639, RECORDS OF KING COUNlY, WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE SOUTH 15 FEET OF THE EAST 22 FEET OF THE WEST 199 FEET, AS MEASURED FROM THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 156TH AVENUE SE, OF THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 156TH AVENUE SE ~ ,, V ii & ,n r..1., -0---[gJ Cl .,o_ 'G:T "" "' rn . .. •::i-:.• .. c .. --.. - . " x-- -D- -V!-· -SD-- LEGEND-EXISTING MONUMENT FOUND THIS SURVEY FOUND PROPERTY CORNER AS SET REBAR & CAP LSI 6228 SET PK & TAG LS# 6228 ELECTRIC METER POWER POLE UTILITY POLE GUY ANCHOR PHONE OR CABLE PEDESTAL FIRE HYDRANT WATER VALVE WATER METER CATCH BASIN OR INLET GAS METER DECIDUOUS AS DESCRIBED OVER HEAD ELECTRIC LINES EDGE OF PAVEMENT CHAIN LINK OR WIRE FENCE WOOD FENCE WATERLINE STORM DRAIN INDICATED LEGEND PROPOSED 111 WATER METER M WATER VALVE 1.H.F1RE HYDRANT if'1I WATER TEE W/ CONG. BLOCKING 11 CATCH BASIN • MANHOLE • CLEANOUT [ CAP PROPERTY LINE. (PROPOSED) LOT UNE (PROPOSED) lTTlTTT1!i i BUILDINGS ) 0 ( CULVERT --454 ·--CONTOUR LINE --EXISTING LOT LINE/ROW c:'~~~ ~: 0 .I?~' (\ C. , ... i' F'.l, if~~. ~--7/' ;' !.; .. ; . ·, ' ' . " . . ~< ' ' i " f. ·1· . ,., ' 'o,,. ,{ ·,,;· .,c_st, . \ ' u ' _.:::~ jJ Q, l:· ', 00 ,;' r:;.:<I r1l ~:~~~~'"!!~ ,, '1. -·- NOTES: l\.-. _ _,r,' '' i"" f"'lo ",_, .. ,, . ./ .. :.:::' ,.:::.;, 1 • BUILDINGS MARKED WITH AN * WILL BE DEMOLISHED. DRYCO TOPOGRAPHY BY GEORGE W. DRYSDALE, DRYCO P.L.S. Surveying & Mapping 12714 VALLEY AVENUE EAST SUMNER, WASHINGTON 98390 (253) 826-0300 FAX (253) 826-9703 PLAT OF EVENDELL LOI PO"Ol{t,I SCALE: 1"=100' 75 LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT DRAWN BY: MJR DATE: 5/29/01 REVISED: - U.S. LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES PREPARED FOR: P.O. BOX 22200, SEATILE, WA 98122-0200 CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 22617 -8TH DR. SE., BOTHELL, WA 98021 (425) 486-2563 OFF. ( 425) 486-3273 FAX SHEET 1 OF 1 L...---------------·----------··--------------------------------------------~--------------------·---------------------------J , ;r MAIN FILF COPY I : " •