Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA81-016
1 --- -- -- LANPSCAPING 69' J__EXIsTIN6-ALLE_y -I y` SUBJECTECT 91?'>= 1 < NINE-Erli nt4 .sraus -- - _ -_-- --�- -- PRuklus AUTLIMALL 5-21',2CALIPPR 20 -19 -- b-- 17_ • v-- - 19-- 1¢- I� 2 i1 w AT C2PecA1E Rocsr ALL. ., ry DRAINPc�E —i�` F}IA L6.J12EL 2:AI'5ELI.I�IA •yam_CPtJ - — - CI OF REM'OIJ 9$JJR32D'.7.1�M/�1 U u AT 4•'o.c.- Ac>C0E2ED. I Ic i ' a eggsr OC RHoc»o51.IG20N so"-Sa. MaoI IsToti15 - .81...0 O Wigg° I.AREAS Senn/EEO Pl.t I Jo 122'MEG.BARK MUL H- I - , e y7 - I ,•� E�I ' 2.PLANT IF1A�a2L'A4ka WITH 6BZT NuR R-/SV>IJlocd2. I 5'10 ASPFWLT ` `p 1 0 -Ex1STINL.v -- / / ff/ Nc�-EX.)STI CLIN -5I7 GG IC 1LDIK a Nous�- ONE STORY-ToT/aL AREA 3,8009,F. 11° RP.4.P,,M11- 7 -11 STALLS=_1. 5 --y m WELLS AVE N• -I I- I �7 1 t- 't—-----1-- 1 to �0 PRoI'xosR PAAKINb j I: - U I �• �` TR. ExI0TINC0CLINICI �� 1 G EXISTIN •STALLS ,''''VY e ...,/://4 To 5E Ea,) .--_,--_ _ PSLLY AVE. N• _ \ //' _ 7i- 5 24� ,.N 20 I I S IlIlili, l6f In II EXIbT•t{OLJS6 I. VICINITY MAP NORTIJ ✓� 1 • z //p — LDJJ'14YJAPINf7 `^v _ LOT2 77 LoT3 v. LO 4 u .-- 3���1�,�j EXITINC�SPRlK.F �svewm.e PowER Pots .. . �.'- A J\1" ' n --,...-. - , i \ —- _,,- ,. w cJR6 cur.' - •1 I 1 O 5 to 20 SO AO . So " -- - --- - ---- NoRrI ` -- _ • -- CEE__AL IJ y --=1oS TREK-24 ReNT- -�m�n abr_N-3. Q PELLY AVE. N. ll D cuRocur, cugacuT "- • • r . _ y()%/%.S. RrCEII/ED o °� �1 III FEB 19 �= 198� RENToI I EXITINb' HOUSE EXI -11Nty PUPLEx. - oItys� '� a oPToMETR/C.J-IIJIG - -16' �........... _� :1 q �iNG DEPIklik --- — -- -- --- -- —.-- — --- --- — -- — --- L. • • -- 0 a, • ;*•' '; . . • j • . --- _ .• .__ . . _. . . . , . lac, !,1 ,:_,,.... . . . • LANPSCARINC7 #.:7 `i. j�1 15 1N6 ou Ey . . 8U JEG 61 - ,{., ,'. <;r MINA:lruiN '_sroa-Ls -- -- A PRUNus AUTUMAWS-2'1 C3a4•1PbR.) S 20 _19 Y. H- 4ii. 6_r:i.4 'l. -- - 1l '� . ATG"P6o✓E �1.L. !_ ..I ! :',:,X: :r= �o pekIN Pee--III F 11• .•�• La+-11eE1.ZAf3ELLIANA •5UM-CAI•l •j -- - I - CIT`/OF T�Nicl.l O�.NL�iD' .�. 0 hti l F.T}'O.C."�1TP66EaQGD to • •a I Ii.aREbB 5erWE8t.l PLANT111t,1 Z'.MEt2 OA=Ml1t.G+ • t 1 I S.Pw1r UJ��call�vlrrH pear 1JWzsaR�sm.lt vs. I. ' Asp.1o.LT1- ' •� VII --EX15TaNC� CLINIC �LIILDIIIGS - wousE. _ z / _ B HouSE._ ONE STORy-TbTAL ARCH 3,6o09.F. '�f 'KElj-PP¢KINb-19 STNLs- (,.. t�---1 WELLS AVE N. �� -1 - ' JJ I---- ' I 4(rjG� _ - PROPOSED PAKKIFJO 1• , 0 V .( — FOR EKISTIN 50.1NILi ` X _ al To 66 Eo I r- -- Iii . . Z. . , ' 7 -.::._-=',_ 1 1 4. Pawe Ave. N• — ' J' 24' 1 20 1 t ' II/ . • - 6 �I I !� •♦. AP . �!I',' '111' '1011 rt •J-6,CI T House ' i _. VICINITY MAP Norm / m •• Il'o — • waxes 4 ►F1t AP ' r���`T EXITINC.v57.Tie I LOT I. __ l.or3�' • �•�a LOT4 i ' � <:.. To gEMAl1.i�40 NI6P1 5W6�LL' PowER Pots .. _ .. . NEW cUR6 cUT.' 1 1 I . 0 5 Io 20 30 40 so ,��T�'I� _ "LEGAL I - - Y --_LOTAT_61A 2•I4 RENTON - T.F -PST N=3. ' PeLLY AVE. N. • cuR$cuT•/ ---- calrc6CUT• -- - •Ij IV I ®F \k--'Y i 'l/i-: PErFIVED 0 • . '(-.4 FEB 19 1981 I -RENTON E#IST1Nb'House FpcISTINc�PUPL6�C oPToMETRY C1141Io 9 • � /- I '- /� D EP�� 3 / i I I 'I N.,, .-4`,..:'.•:'':4-'777117---. -.'•', . ...- '.. './ ...._.7V, •.4,7 .--:...... '-': ; .' 0 -44 , '•:›N,,._ N''e t.,. i: • lTi`1 ,AQ. L •. o ' '7d9/o i.y V ' J-C .>, ' • / .1/4..o. /0 •;•' \:, ,• ./ # •ri- ' �, `� q� O • A = s `0 0I r4 � . �F /if/ J4 ;,. fir„ iA , � , •�` losta�,;, a t :-* Sif a , •"( r____ 4.- V , >?1,'i \ 1- . g : * 11061°. . I F .2 I ri . --- — - — - -- ° � \\./ ,,, . - o— `} C �,\ fir/4� .t / b of ;Z,'0 s/ �, ,9�° G. : \"'• • ,, '-4, . so ;' W o K . . oat b; , � � � ' S jic A /ey21 £1 E; s . o ! 'f= S6oa X t \(3AV Si c`' - r ` f+-__, � _�� r —L 4.6 4 9g:..'-•.e..•`''‘.'a f.'‘6. 1- •4-,-.-,--I•. . a 1•,.'-:, :' 4'7 \\ f . n . .1 0:12 ,� 1 �0�, r~ r •LP1 ►D4 , r '5 ' . ' 4 • J. • 1+. + TA -cs,14: 4 s6 0., - i. t�� „ , . tilt» i+p } @£0 r ' - y6 o , s „ r___ A °' r r� j a ,( I- SCEI ' '4070 . Zr - • E S 0 `✓�. ZZ� ,s��r�, s__ � i` . o , le 9 /f;1. 66'� 1z''� 9 7 ,.: I A. .Ge/e' e,r y£ C, e h `J'J , , czs , . t z k I _ pd ' oo Zji j . ��_pz ti .L �0� 3 ¢�• _ a �3 i 6 iIgilli!ti:lielr ifiE . . I i0 j�. I r�Lao y I r x H 14' ., , . _41. I. .?..1..., 1 _ , i { I i / s r.- i 't- t-e--- .t • r._-_.- --- -- 1 7 i I 14 t 1 'd\-� i .,. .l` • BEGINNING OF FILE FILETITLE MICROFILMED 5 1-21-4 ill° 11) RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting May 18 , 1981 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P . M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council President; RANDALL ROCKHILL, ROBERT COUNCIL HUGHES, EARL CLYMER, THOMAS W. TRIMM AND JOHN REED. Councilman CHARLES F. SHANE arrived at 8:05 p.m. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; MICHAEL IN ATTENDANCE PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; RICHARD HOUGHTON, Acting Public Works Director; LT. DON PERSSON, Police Department; MAXINE MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk and Recorder. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF MAY ll , 1981 , AS PRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED. SPECIAL Jackie Aspaas of the Renton Municipal Arts Commission and Helen PRESENTATION Williams of the Renton Annual Art Show presented the art work entitled "The Yakima Kid," a serigraph, to the City Council for approval Donated Art from the Renton Annual Art Show. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND TRIMM, Work ACCEPT THE ART WORK ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been published, L. I .D. #320 posted and mailed, Mayor Shinpoch opened the public hearing to con- Waterline sider the Preliminary Assessment Roll for Local Improvement District N 27th Street No. 320 in the amount of $22,825.01 for installation of waterline in NE 27th Street between Edmonds Ave. NE and Devils Elbow. A letter from the Public Works Department reported one protest has been received representing 47.26% of the total assessment roll (60o required to terminate the L. I .D. ) . Letter from Paul W. Houser, Jr. , Attorney representing Clarence Jones, 2625 NE 27th St. , re- quested his name be withdrawn from the petition, claiming Mr. Jones ' property was not specifically benefitted as already served by water. Clarence Jones was in attendance and opposed the L. I .D. , claiming adequate water and fire protection. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND CLYMER, Public Hearing be closed. CARRIED. Stredicke moved, Hughes seconded, Council authorize and order the construction of the LID, as presented and refer to the Ways and Means Committee. MOTION FAILED. MOVED BY REED, SECOND TRIMM, RECONSIDER THE PREVIOUS ACTION AND REOPEN Public Hearing PUBLIC HEARING . CARRIED. MOVED BY REED, SECOND TRIMM, CONTINUE Continued to THE PUBLIC HEARING ON L. I .D. #320 UNTIL 6/15/81 TO ALLOW THE PUBLIC 6/15/81 WORKS DEPARTMENT TO BRING SOME ALTERNATIVE FORMULAS TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Appeal of Michael Hanis , Attorney, 17234 Springbrook Rd. S, representing Dominic Colasurdo Dominic Colasurdo, Special Permit SP-024-81 , requested Council con- Special Permit sider the subject. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND REED, SUSPEND BUSINESS SP-024-81 AND MOVE TO REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE RE APPEAL OF DOMINIC COLASURDO. CARRIED. The Planning and Development Area: South side Committee report considered the appeal of the decision of the Hearing of NE 4th St. , Examiner dated 4/6/81 and was unable to make recommendation to the East of Union NE Council concerning disposition of the appeal as the two members present were unable to agree whether the Hearing Examiner was correct in the required preservation of the stream. Mr. Hanis Conflicting claimed drainage ditch and presented legal definition. Mary E. Hamblin Testimony 13025 138th SE, Renton, claimed the stream was natural water course; explained history of same. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, THAT THE SUBJECT MATTER BE REMANDED BACK TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION AND RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Renton City Council 5/18/81 Page 2 Audience Comment - Continued FAI-405 HOV Lanes Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Ave. S, expressed concern over future plans and Ramp Metering by the Highway Department regarding 1-405 stagnation of traffic in the City and noted his letter in Record Chronicle re this subject. (See later motion. ) Versie Vaupel , 400 Cedar Ave. S, also expressed concern in this matter. Proclamation Proclamation of Mayor Shinpoch declared the month of May 1981 as American Legion POPPY MONTH and 5/22-23/81 as POPPY DAYS urging community support. Poppy Days Lana Taylor, American Legion Fred Hancock Post, was presented and accepted the proclamation. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN PROCLAMATION. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the business items included: Cascadia City Clerk Mead requested ordinance completing the Cascadia Annexa- Annexation tion. Area: Union Ave. to 140th SE, Honeydew School to SE 128th. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Public Works Public Works Department requested project acceptance, final pay Project CAG 056-80 estimate, begin 30-day lien period for release of retained amount upon receipt of proper documents; CAG 065-80 Signal Electric Inc. , NE 4th Street and Union Ave. NE roadway widening and signalization. Council concur. Dr. David Woodcock Land Use Hearing Examiner recommended approval subject to conditions Rezone R-015-81 as modified by reconsideration for Rezone R-015-81 and Special SP-016-81 Permit SP 016-81 ; Dr. David Woodcock property located at 123 Pelly Ave. N. R-2 to R-3; Special Permit to serve existing dental clinic (parking lot) . Refer to Ways and Means Committee. First Cities Appeal has been filed of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of Equities Appeal 4/28/81 First Cities Equities, Earlington Park Preliminary Plat PP-056-80 PP-056-80; simultaneous approval of rezone and preliminary plat requested. Refer to Planning and Development Committee for recommendation. LID #321 Finance Department requested acceptance of low bid of Peoples Sewers NE Sunset National Bank (l2o interest) to provide interim financing of LID and Duvall NE No. 321 in the amount of $70,000 for sanitary sewers in vicinity of NE Sunset Blvd. and Duvall Ave. NE. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. Damages Claim Claim for damages was filed by Santa J. Wierzbicki , 765 S 27th St. , Wierzbicki for water damage loss in amount of $340.62. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Proclamation Proclamation of Mayor Shinpoch declared May 23 and 23, 1981 as VFW. Poppy Days Poppy Days and May as Poppy Month for Veteran of Foreign Wars to honor the dead by helping the living, raising funds by selling poppies. Council concur. Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, ACCEPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS Approved PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Wheel Chair Ramp Mayor Shinpoch reported a note of thanks was received by the Mayor and members of the City Council from residents of Cedar River Terrace thanking them for the wheel chair ramp installed at the corner of Burnett Ave. "Controlled Letter from Michael Porter, Chairman, Renton Planning Commission, Growth" was read requesting further information and clarification concerning Council Policy the City Council referral of 4/20/81 of the Renton Chamber of Commerce letter asking specific guidelines for annexations and 4/4 a tee OF R 4,A L� a g /arksin "f © ° THE CITY OF RENTON a. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. REN ION,WASH. 98055 o °' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9° co FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235-2593 09gTFD SEP1c._k0 April 20, 1981 TO: Jerry Lind, Building Department FROM: FredKaufman, Hearing Examiner RE: File No. R-015-81 , SP-016-81 ; David G. Woodcock; Request for Reconsideration This office has received a request for reconsideration in the above entitled matter in regard to landscape treatment necessary to buffer an adjoining single family home. Would you please review the attached alternative plans and the original recommendation of this office. The applicant wants to landscape the north side of the clinic facility between the parking lot and the clinic. The recommendation concentrated the landscaping next to the single family residence located immediately to the north of the proposed parking lot. Please feel free to make suggestions on carrying out both purposes , if possible, but concentrating on buffering the single family home. Both landscaping and fencing may be utilized for this purpose. There are dimensional constraints, so please consult with the Planning and Building Departments in this matter. Please respond as quickly as possible but not later than Friday as a reconsideration must be published within 10 days of receipt by this office. 4.1&.„-Q f rPir cc: 'Planning Department APR 20 1981 Building Department Public Works Department -e /NG DEP � !. • D NE L& ON • AQCKITE( . 410 Bellevue Way Southeast Suite 301 Bellevue,Washington 98004 • (206) 455-4900 • • April 17, 1981 ' • , Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 ' Re : File No. R-015-81 , . • SP-016-81 123 Pelly Avenue North`" • Parking Lot Addition for Existing Clinic • Dear Mr. Kaufman: • Wel wish to request reconsideration of the above referenced project it regard specifically to the 10 ' landscape buffer that has been required by your office as part of your approval of our re-zone and special permit. I1,' is my feeling that the 10 ' landscape buffer on the north side of the parking lot would almost totally eliminate any landscaping next to Our building and tend to reduce the quality of the over- all]. project. I appreciate your concern for the 10' buffer but winder if -we couldn ' t solve it in one of the following three methods: Alternate #1 : Reduce the buffer to 6 ' and intensify the landscaping both by specie as well as quantity. Alternate #2 : Provide one of the schemes as recommended by the ' .. Planning Department. ' • Alternate #3: Allow us to proceed with:our scheme as presented . with the 'addition of an' attractively designed site,. . screening cedar, stained fence, approximately .41 ,.; • high on the property line . We' appreciate your time and trouble in reviewing with possible , ri •' econsideration of our recommendations. Please call if you have.;' , ' any questio s. . sinter y RECEIVED . CITY OF RENTON NEgR�1G E:cAM,Ir;�R Ned Ne s n, AIA ��l�l c' 13t,� AP1f NN/r� '7.8�9�10,�1r12r"t�2c`:zr .r��roi A Member•American Institute of Architects T-7, i . , .- • • . ... . , . . . �I otl 1 - .PYRAM IDALIS — - t • • . . . I 51-6I NICtH, 3� o. C..MIN. ill-- .i : o i •0 . . 'I • ( . . . ' 0 • , ID ► Z 11 J � } 41 4 , 1 0 )- • • AP 1 . . IL 0* 1 J % OC . 7 . ' ‘ • 1 . • • . 1 • 1 '• 0 . 1 • <( . ' ' - • I -f . • 1 � % 0 1 • I ° • . .PI NIL . HE..TNEtr 11111 4 D.C., 5-c,4L.c.AN i , . • . ALTeRNATV LAM,SC' I t44 . 123 PELL"•( AVEµUL I.I. _ NED NE LBON • AQCJIITECT Ns REGISTERED • W (A 410 Bellevue Way eoulhcaat buile 301 NICHITECT I- Bellevue.W .hinglon 98004 • . NED H.NELSON,JR. 4 N • (206) 455-4900 • STREW*$NINGTON . Member.American Inat.rtute of Archdceta Fo se By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Exami:'gar For Agenda Of May 18, 1981 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. R-015-81 , SP-016-81 ; Consent X Public Hearing Dr DavirLj,Jnndrork; Rezone & Correspondence. Special Permit Ordinance/Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. Examiner's Report, 4-3-81 Other B. Request for Reconsideration, 4-17-81 Approval : C. Examiner's Response, 4-28-81 Legal Dept. Yes No N/A X COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval —�. Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A X Other Clearance with cond i t ions as mod[f i ed FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary. ) The applicant submitted a request for reconsideration during the initial appeal perliod for the referenced applications to reduce the required landscaping in. the area abutting the single family residence. Following review of this alternative by the city's landscape architect, the Examiner determined that, :. the condition should be modified to allow no less than six feet of landscaping. in that location. The second appeal period expired on May 12, 1981 , and the. matter is now .forwarded to the Council for review and subsequent adoption of an ordinance. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See page 4 of the attached report. SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. OF R�-v :".„p1 O THE CITY OF RENTON 410 Z' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 odIMOD 44# o °BARBARA'. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9'O co. FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 094TeD SEP1 ‘��P May 14, 1981 Mr. Ned Nelson, AIA 410 Bellevue Way S.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 RE: File No. R-015-81 , SP-016-81 ; Dr. David Woodcock Request for Rezone and Special Permit. Dear Mr. Nelson: This is to notify you that the above referenced requests, which were approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of April 3, 1981 , and modified in response to a request for reconsideration, dated April 28, 1981 , have not been further appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, these applications are being submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for final approval . You will receive notification of final approval upon adoption of an ordinance by the City Council . Sincerely, 446J1 Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department t • • O F 4'� �4% ~ur THE CITY OF RENTON rr�:°= x� �*f MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 seelL o BARBARA'. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 6♦ FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 O9�TFa SEP�E�O�P April 28, 1981 Mr. Ned Nelson, AIA 410 Bellevue Way S.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 RE: File No. R-015-81 , SP-016-81 ; Dr. David Woodcock Request for Rezone and Special Permit; Request for Reconsideration. Dear Mr. Nelson: • I have had an opportunity to review your request for reconsideration in the above entitled matter, and find that your request is justified in light of the review by Jerry Lind, the city's Landscape Architect. Therefore, the condition which requires ten feet (10') of landscaping in the area abutting the single family residence is modified to allow no less than six feet (6') of landscaping in that location, and subject to review and approval of the city's Landscape Architect. A new appeal period has now been established for this application to expire on May 12, 1981 . If further information is required, please contact this office. Sincerely, • T as. Fred J . Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Parties of Record OF R.• �i ° BUILDING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR mom p � MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540� O �Q 9��Eo SEPT �� April 23, 1981 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR TO: Fred Kaufman FROM: Jerry Lind RE: File No. R-015-81, SP-016-81; David G. Woodcock; Request fox Reconsideration Pursuant to your memorandum of April 20, 1981 regarding the above request for reconsideration, it would seem to be a satisfactory solution to allow a reduction of the landscape buffer from ten to six feet as the applicant has proposed. It is my belief that the intensity of the landscaping proposed within the six foot strip would be sufficient to screen the adjoining single family home and still allow enough space for interior landscaping to abut the clinic. . I would further recommend the addition of approximately three trees within this strip as an additional mitigation measure for the screening. These should be canopy type trees such as a maple or oak, and be placed on 30 foot centers. JFL/mp cc: Ron Nelson Dave Clemens RECEIVED Dick Houghton CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER APR 1981 AM PM 8`3&9 1111121112131415l6 A • OF R4,,, v ;sr a ° THE CITY OF RENTON ;, • -= .� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 aka LL rn o BARBARA'. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9° `O• FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 April 20, 1981 TO: Jerry Lind, Building Department FROM: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner RE: File No. R-015-81 , SP-016-81 ; David G. Woodcock; Request for Reconsideration This office has received a request for reconsideration in the above entitled matter in regard to landscape treatment necessary to buffer an adjoining single family home. Would you please review the attached alternative plans and the original recommendation of this office. The applicant wants to landscape the north side of the clinic facility between the parking lot and the clinic. The recommendation concentrated the landscaping next to the single family residence located immediately to the north of the proposed parking lot. Please feel free to make suggestions on carrying out both purposes, if possible, but concentrating on buffering the single family home. Both landscaping and fencing may be utilized for this purpose. There are dimensional constraints, so please consult with the Planning and Building Departments in this matter. Please respond as quickly as possible but not later than Friday as a reconsideration must be published within 10 days of receipt by this office. " 1i cc: Planning Department Building Department Public Works Department • • „ D NELSON - ADCIIITEC 410 Bellevue Way southea6t suite 301 Bellevue, Washington 98004 (206) 455-4900 April 17, 1981 Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner CLty of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re : File No . R-015-81 , SP-016-81 123 Pelly Avenue North Parking Lot Addition for Existing Clinic Dear Mr . Kaufman: We wish to request reconsideration of the above referenced project in regard specifically to the 10 ' landscape buffer that has been required by your office as part of your approval of our re-zone and special permit . It is my feeling that the 10 ' landscape buffer on the north side Of the parking lot would almost totally eliminate any landscaping next to our building and tend to reduce the quality of the over- all project. I appreciate your concern for the 10 ' buffer but Wonder if we couldn ' t solve it in one of the following three methods : lternate #1 : Reduce the buffer to 6 ' and intensify the landscaping both by specie as well as quantity. Alternate #2 : Provide one of the schemes as recommended by the Planning Department . Alternate #3 : Allow us to proceed with our scheme as presented with the addition of an attractively designed site screening cedar, stained fence , approximately 4 ' high on the property line . We appreciate your time and trouble in reviewing with possible reconsideration of our recommendations . Please call if you have any questions. / Sincer y RECEIVE® CITY ®F RENTON HEARNG EXAMMER Ned Ne s n, AIA 1 ��; e NN/r t81948101)://42i7 -� M1.. 3 0�rl`� Member•American Institute of Architects 4f, aI oti .PY RAM IDAL.15 51-al H 10-11 34- v. C.M I N, ' „. /itf ` o ( . ,, 0 :I IC) . . IA ) . 0 11) . Z -I 4 0 3 J y 0 .- -111 1 1 • tC W 0* 2 1 o • 1 1 1 .. 0 i . ( 1 . 0 if \ . . 4 0 0 1 a PINIL HE/ il-1EIS r 410 461 D.c• u... cAN I , 5-4 :� o. PkLTERNAT'E LAND-SCAPI Kt<1 123 PELL`( Avaµum 14. _ NED NEL&ON • AQCIIITECT • N REGISTERED tI 410 Bellevue Waygouthcsat t ARCHITECT W � 8ui a 901 . F- 'I` Bellevue.Weahington 98004 NED H.NELSON,JR. 4 S • (206) 455-4900 suh W SHIN6TON Meabcr•Aacrrlcan Inatatute of Architects • $ s,,, ti April 3 1981 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON APR ••.3 1981 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL, NED NELSON ARCHITECT APPLICANT: Dr. David Woodcock FILE NO. R-015-81 , SP-016-81 LOCATIOI,: 123 Pelly Avenue N. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests a rezone of the subject site from R-2 to R-3 and approval of a special permit to use the subject site as a, parking lot to service an existing clinic. SUMMARY OF ACTION/ -Planning Department Recommendation (Rezone) : Approval RECOMMENDATION: Planning Department Recommendation (Special Permit) : Approval subject to execution of restrictive covenants. Hearing Examiner Recommendation (Rezone and Special Permit) : Approval subject to conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on March 18, 1981 . PUBLIC H ARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on March 24, 1981 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. • Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was re orted that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department preliminary report.• Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the report , and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : . Rezone Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Special Permit Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #3: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #4: Site Plan of Parking as submitted Exhibit #5: Alternative Parking Lot Design submitted by Planning Department Mr: Blaylock advised that the modified parking lot design would require pruning of an existing spruce tree located at the northeast corner of the site. Referencing Section M. 1 of the special permit recommendation, the Examiner noted that covenants precluding subsequent sale of Lot No. 4 would not be necessary if the entire property were replatted and the three lots were consolidated into one parcel . He then inquired regarding the total number of required parking spaces. Mr. Blaylock advised that 19 stalls would be required. The Examiner noted that once the building is brought intoconformity with required parking, the use would be conforming and parking could not be eliminated through the sale of Lot No. 4. Mr. Blaylock corrected Section M.3 of the Planning Department report, second line, to reference Section L.5, not L.4. The Examiner requested testimony in support of the application. Responding was: Ned Nelson 410 Bellevue Way S.E. , Suite 301 Bellevue, WA 98004 Mr. Nelson stated that parking space is inadequate in the area and approval of the special permit would be beneficial both to the subject property and the surrounding neighborhood. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 3rd day of April , 19 81 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. • Subscribed and sworn this .94,40 day of 19 "/ . ota y Public in and for t e Stat . of Washington, residing a Application, Petition or Case: Dr. David Woodcock; R-015-81 , SP-016-81 (The r Ln te4 contain a P.iis t of the pate of necond. ) .-Arl y April 3, 1981 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT' AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Dr. David Woodcock FILE NO. R-015-81 , SP-016-81 LOCATION: 123 Pelly Avenue N. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests a rezone of the subject site from R-2 to R-3 and approval of a special permit to use the subject site as a parking lot to service an existing clinic. SUMMARY OF ACTION/ Planning Department Recommendation (Rezone) : Approval RECOMMENDATION: Planning Department Recommendation (Special Permit) : Approval • subject to execution of restrictive covenants. Hearing Examiner Recommendation (Rezone and Special Permit) : Approval subject to conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on March 18, 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows : The hearing was opened on March 24, 1981 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department preliminary report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Rezone Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Special Permit Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #3: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #4: Site Plan of Parking as submitted Exhibit #5: Alternative Parking Lot Design submitted by Planning Department Mr. Blaylock advised that the modified parking lot design would require pruning of an existing spruce tree located at the northeast corner of the site. Referencing Section M. 1 of the special permit recommendation, the Examiner noted that covenants precluding subsequent sale of Lot No. 4 would not be necessary if the entire property were replatted and the three lots were consolidated into one parcel . He then inquired regarding the total number of required parking spaces. Mr. Blaylock advised that 19 stalls would be requred. The Examiner noted that once the building is brought into conformity with required parking, the use would be conforming and parking could not be eliminated through the sale of Lot No. 4. Mr. Blaylock corrected Section M. 3 of the Planning Department report, second line, to reference Section L.5, not L.4. The Examiner requested testimony in support of the application. Responding was: Ned Nelson 410 Bellevue Way S.E. , Suite 301 Bellevue, WA 98004 Mr. Nelson stated that parking space is inadequate in the area and approval of the special permit would be beneficial both to the subject property and the surrounding neighborhood. f4 IL R-015-81 , SP-016-81 Page Two. He supported the proposal to consolidate the three lots into one parcel in order to conform to the applicant's site plan, Exhibit #4, which he preferred to the alternative site plan submitted by the Planning Department. Mr. Nelson indicated that resale of the property would be difficult if sufficient parking is not provided. He also advised concurrence in retaining the existing spruce tree which will buffer the new parking lot from the adjacent residence. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding proximity of the residence to the south to the subject site, Mr. Blaylock advised that from 10 to 15 feet separate the two. Mr. Nelson clarified that due to the operating hours of the clinic from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. at the latest, problems with headlights shining into adjacent residences would be minimal , and if complaints were received in the future, a small fence could be erected as part of the landscaping program. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. Since there was no response, the hearing regarding File No. SP-016-81 was closed by the Examiner at 9:45 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a reclassification of approximately 5,000 square feet from R-2 zoning (Duplex Residential) to R-3 zoning (Medium Density Multifamily) together with a special permit to establish an accessory parking lot for a professional clinic. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The subject property is located at 123 Pelly Avenue N. The property is located about midblock on the west side of the street. The site is essentially level . An existing single family home located on the subject site will be removed if the requests are approved. 8. The subject site was annexed into the city by Ordinance No. 156 in 1909. The site was classified R-2 upon adoption of the initial zoning ordinance in 1953. 9. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of medium density multifamily housing. 10. The applicant proposes establishing a parking lot on the subject site to serve as i accessory parking for the adjoining clinic operated by the applicant. In order to establish the clinic or its accessory uses on the subject site the applicant has requested that the property be reclassified to R-3. An R-3 zoning designation permits the establishment of clinics and accessory uses after approval of a special permit (Section 4-709A(A) (3)) . 11 . The area in which the subject site is located has a variety of uses. The adjacent lot to the north is used for a single family home. Immediately to the south is the clinic operated by the applicant. Similar clinics and a duplex are established on the east side of Pelly Avenue in this vicinity. Other single family uses are located to the rear (west) of the site adjacent to the alley. 12. The subject site is at the extreme southern part of a large multiblock R-2 zone. The clinic to the south is part of a three parcel P-1 zone. Across from the clinic and slightly southeast of the subject site is a two parcel R-3 zone with a duplex residence. 13. The proposed parking lot is intended to serve the adjoining clinic which has R-o15-81 , SP-016-81 Page Three insufficient parking both for its needs and for current city requirements. The clinic is now a legal non-conforming use. Ten additional parking spaces are proposed for the subject site for a total of 20 stalls for the clinic'. Nineteen stalls are 'till required (Section 4-2208(2) (A) ) . 14. Since the subject site is a separate legal lot, the driveway serving the proposed parking lot may not be less than five feet from the adjoining property line. Either a variance from Section 4-2208(2) (A) or a replatting of the subject lot and the adjacent clinic property would permit the driveway as proposed. The applicant indicated that replatting the property was a strong possibility. Replatting the property would perpetually tie the parking lot to its principal use in conformance with the Parking and Loading Ordinance. II CONCLUSIONS: (Rezone) I 1 . The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare in addition to compliance with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 4-3010 which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. Tie applicant has demonstrated that the necessary criteria have been met to permit the reclassification of the subject property. 2. The R-3 classification requested by the applicant is compatible with the designation in the Comprehensive Plan. The area is designated in the Comprehensive Plan as suitable for the development of medium density multifamily housing which is permitted by the R-3 zoning requested. 3. The area was zoned R-2 in 1953 upon enactment of the original zoning ordinance. Since that time, there have been no further zoning analyses of the area or of the subject parcel . 4. There was a similar request in 1979 (File No. R-364-79) for R-3 zoning on the other side of Pelly Avenue N. In that case that applicant also wanted to establish a clinic. The City Council in granting an appeal reversed the Hearing Examiner and granted R-3 zoning and the special permit to allow a clinic. 5. While the R-3 zoning is not especially compatible with either the R-2 zoning which predominates in the area nor the P-1 zoning just south of the subject property, the Co1mprehensive Plan does designate the area for medium density multifamily uses, and therefore the request would not be spot zoning. 6. The property to the north is still used for single family housing and should also be protected from the proposed higher density zoning and uses which may be potentially established on the subject parcel . Unless the single family use is protected by substantial landscaping and fencing, the property value of this adjoining parcel will be impaired in violation of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, the appropriate city agency should review and approve all landscape plans for the subject site in order to provide a consistent policy of adequately buffering the single family uses from higher intensity uses similar to the subject site's R-3 zoning. Adequate buffering shall consist of not less than 10 feet of landscape treatment. (Special Permit) 7. In order to approve a special permit, the applicant must demonstrate that the proposed use, which is otherwise prohibited in the zone requested, will not adversely affect the general health, safety or welfare and will not adversely affect neighboring properties. While the proposal would impose a parking lot immediately adjacent to a single family use, adequate screening of no less than 10 feet of landscaping may serve to buffer and protect the single family home from the light, noise, glare and odors generated by the proposed parking lot. R-015-6_ , SP-016-81 Page Fo=ir 8. The clinic is already an existing non-conforming use as to parking, and the proposal amounts to creating a parking lot for the clinic on the subject site. Parking lots are not only accessory uses to clinics but required by the Parking and Loading Ordinance. The establishment of the parking lot will enable the applicant 's clinic to attain a legal and conforming status under the Zoning Code. Once such status is established, the applicant may not remove or otherwise separate the parking lot from the clinic. For this reason the applicant should replat the subject lot and the adjoining clinic property into one parcel . This would permanently couple the required parking and the clinic use. This consolidation would also eliminate any need for a variance from the provision of the Parking and Loading Ordinance with reference to driveway/lot line distance. 9. There are additional questions raised as to promotion and protection of the public interest in both preserving property values and preserving the pool of land designated for multifamily residential purposes within the city, especially the urban core. The current application is a further example of the pyramiding permitted by the Zoning Code. Such pyramiding permits usurption of land designated for one purpose by another mutually exclusive use. In this case, land designated for residential purposes is converted to parking for a clinic. The area in which the subject site is located is generally zoned for duplex residential development, but there are a number of clinics in the area. While the Comprehensive Plan indicated that such professional uses may be compatible with multifamily housing (Page 11 , Land Use Report) , the purpose of such inclusion is to permit some professional offices in residential neighborhoods but not to permit the conversion of residential neighborhoods to professional parks. Since this pyramiding effect may, in fact, be causing an adverse effect on the available supply of land of certain types within the city, the City Council may wish to study this issue in more detail . 10. While generally the City Council only passes upon the rezone request contained within this report, the second matter is closely associated with the rezone and cannot be approved without approval of the rezone, and, therefore, both matters have been forwarded to the City Council for review. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject- property from R-2 to R-3 subject to provision of a 10-foot landscape buffer, the planting treatment subject to review by the appropriate city agency. The special permit to establish an accessory use, a parking lot, for a clinic in an R-3 zone should be approved subject to approval of the above reclassification request and subject to replatting the subject lot and adjacent clinic into one parcel . ORDERED THIS 3rd day of April , 1981 . Fred J. Ka an Land Use He ring Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 3rd day of April , 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: Ned Nelson, 410 Bellevue Way S.E. , Suite 301 , Bellevue, WA 98004 TRANSMITTED THIS 3rd day of April , 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney R-015-81 , SP-016-81 Page Five Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before April 17, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14)I days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. 8\ \ Mrs Ia trim FRI Omni Mir. 10 Tel Mal Irk, VC ULU or Bwl few MIN on own .06 A pop 114 wit 10 H- 1 ` Env OKI - . tur® | ����� `i �= K ~ ' --��,`, APPLICANT DAVID G. WOODCOCK, JR ^ TOTAL AREA ±5,000 sq ^ ft ^ PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via pmlly Avenue North EXISTING ZONING R-29 Raodience two Family ; min ^ lot oioo 7v200 sq . ft . EXISTING USE Single Family Dwellings ' PROPOSED USE Rezone to R-3 ; Special Permit for parking lot High Density Multiple Family . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN . COMMENTS ' | ~ i 11111.• II.I•••.I . . . • II.. 4... ' LNP8CAPi HO __-40: 3thy1i1et_ILLSALY- - r_ euo.iecT 61116 .... — rMaj 7--\ -- ....--A-- -- . PRUNUS ALLITUAAALUS-WC/4*W. . AT cf"bolsi Roarregku... . -- —la-13 'SrA64.8 ----) 1 cs7V or iagi:1%.11151Nsaavb61:14.-- I.RI 21- E I§ er L...-atat.2/4VALIKJA•5C,44.OW j....... ' Pr 4..O.C..ZTAIKS4119.1a2 1 !I)1• ma . I:41C EiloGaGliaXILOW 061-36.AllooP5ToNa ; L 44?-114.0 ECTI416211.1 FLO441144:m1 e'sere pm=murk+ . . „.. 1 I ', i 111 ' . I."LAW alitcacatahLkaa v/114 11•14 gailtialiti•304.114141:15. I .1 ' .I • a 1 0604,4-T-1 P a 1 1worms. 0 V , / / L___ 0 4 1 , . f•-•-•,—.gx iwritz CLINIC. er.6.42perjtibUILDIN_G: 041.-s- Houra OW6 5TO -TOTAL.,SIZIE0. %occur. s----1 -----I 1 -=-.,, 1 • ' Ap:/-1 • V. i x ir ita:rtg_z) (G GoiSTIWe.3TAL-1.• E-- LI': • FOR EX1A5TIFIC.;__,_CL.INIIG.,1 1 -a( .„.., • . • = ,... , a . . . . a . . ._ . . „..- = 1 / . POLLY MAL N. ----- .--- - 1 1 G t I . '--• .t-----i'r c°7----TYP. • i • FIIIIIII;li, sa, T.Hcarsa • 1 7), VICINITY MAP worm > 1 a • ., ll'6) law vaa.g.6 se- c.„ 4141i.ii • - Launte...Apsher 0 a• iii.'‘. , - . , 1 . ) Lar3 .-...f imi5.44 4: EX ITINC 5POLV-E LOTS • 1.0T+ ill ' TO IZOMPJ4 S 4.2'H16.94 /.s..., . rt10111.664.e . . . • ZPOWilii XIL.0.. : . • . • --..-4_........ 4 is.l.A . A —.a——4- • / \ _..._ — .... . • Hew cute.cur.' . . , 0 6 10 zo 30 40 60 -1MiEnnii-POiZI- LE ,CLL..: I 1 LOT*, BUG%A,REPToN /SUVA flAr us.5. PRL.L.Y AVE. N. , I I . I . . ' • cur-10 eUr.i,' ' CUM cur . \ r - - - - -- — -- • • . . . • - . . . . . . .- . - .," er;r-fl .... v ,>, •.... .,} ...'.. • I •• ••• ri:-i t.. ••,,.. • • - •• . ;L U L • - • • •1 FEB 1 9 1531 • .--i - NOCIVTIHer HOUSE Rt isTiNts,PUPLimot AZ-Re w ga cuilic, -1, --------'------------ !',. . .,.,. k . t 3 ..f.--? . - • . , /-. • '.• . • .'4, .- --• - • • . . . • , . ! I • " . . . • I- . . . . .______... kiA.. •- 6 • Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. A ,I`ii c3h.e1e Roe being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says thatChe...is the Chief Clerk of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record - Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the SuperiorNOTICE OF 9 Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit, King County, ENVIRONMENTAL r k RE DETERMINATION AL Washington.That the annexed is a...No tie.e EVIEW COMMITTEE i 64.01 , RENTON, ; i _�The.__Eneftni R., Public Notice )- view Committee(ERC)has view Committee(ERC) has as it was published in regular issues(and d Issued a final declaration of further Issued a declaration not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period non-significance for the tol- of significance for the tollow- - lowing CHARLES, UNDER �1 . EProleCM ILIO A N D (ECF-82480) 017RICHARD PIEROTTI(ECF- of consecutive issues,commencing on the Application for Shoreline -81) _ Management Substantial Application for per ..day of �'iAx'c to ,19 81 ,and ending the , gin Development llow'Eco. 8 aaccreewftthm�from '- structlon of 20X20' deck; PACCAR,which would con 1, property located at 3717 slat of dirt and Iron war day of Lake Washington Boulevardlocated In the vicin Y ,19 both dates North propertyig Talbot Roa inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- = 2. DAVID G. WOOD- SotAh. scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee COCK,JR.(ECF-019-81) Further Information re Application for rezone, Me g these actions is av charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $.. . !.3 hick no.R-015-81,from R-2toR_ abbe In the Planning Da has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the 2 ettespoold permit,file no. I Municipal Build first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent f�0iQd1,to allow parking ng, Renton, Washington inselot addition for existing ada- 235-2550. Any appeal o cent medicaVdental clinic; ERC action must be floc ✓ r / property located at 123 Pally with the Hearing Examine Avenue North. • by March!I,1961. The Environmental Re-_._Fubglineld IA Oil Ds Re 0.biof..Clunk •--- --- 1. cord Chofti a March 8 1981.R9401 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 10 day of Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at-I�WKin County. —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective �June 9th, 1955. —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. V.P.C.Form No.87 Rev.7-79 PLANNING DEPARTMENT P1,ELIMIINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING March 24, 1981 APPLICANT : Dr . David Woodcock FILE NUMBER : R-015-81 ; SP-016-81 A . SUMMARY A PURPOSE OF REQUEST : : The applicant requests a rezone of the subject site from R-2 to R-3 and approval of a special permit to use the subject site as a parking lot to service an existing clinic. B. GENERAL INFORI.AT]®NI: 1. Owner of Record: David G. Woodcock, Jr . 2 . Applicant : 1 David G. Woodcock, Jr . 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) 123 Pelly Avenue North 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5. Size of Property : +5,000 square feet 6. Access : Via Pelly Avenue North 7 . Existing Zonings R-2, Residence two family ; minimum lot size 7 , 200 square feet 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : R-2 ; R-3, Residence ' Multiple Family, Minimum lot size 5,000 square feet ; P-1, Public Use District 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : High Density Multiple Family 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on March 8, 1981, and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on March 6, 19.81 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT - 1 PRELIMINARY REPORT T( iE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : Marcos 24 , 1981 DR . DAVID WOODCOCK : R-015-81 ; SP-016-81 PAGE TWO C. HISTOfl YPACH ROIWND : The subject site was. annexed into the City of Renton by Ordinance No. 156 in 1909. D. PHYSICAL I:ACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The subject site is level . 2 . Soils : Urban Land (Ur) This is soil that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick to accommodate large industrial and housing installa- tions . The erosion hazard is slight to moderate. 3. Vegetation : Some lawn and a few shrubs are the principal features on the site. 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation does provide some habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water : No surface water was observed, on the subject site (March 6, 1981) . 6. Land Use: An . existing single family dwelling is located on the subject site with similar uses to the north and west . A clinic is adjacent to the south with single family dwellings, a'' duplex , and another clinic to the east . E . NEIGfl ORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The surrounding properties are -a combination of clinics and single family dwellings. F . iP0.04..IC SERVICES: . 1 . Water and Sewer : A 6" water main runs north-south on Pelly Avenue North along the east side of the street while an 8 inch sanitary sewer lalso runs north-south along the westerly borderiof the property . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the City) of Renton as per ordinance requirements . 3. Transit : Metro transit Routes No . .107, 155, and 240 operate along Park Avenue North approximately one block to the east of the subject site. 4. Schools : Not applicable. 5 . Recreation: Not applicable. G. APPLICAc,LE SECTIONS OF .THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-708 , R-2, Residence Two Family 2 . Section 4-709A, R-3 ; Residence Multiple Family 3 . Section 4-722B, Special Permits H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS. OF THE ' COI1PIWIHIENISl[VIE PLAN! OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: , 1 . Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report , 1965 , Objectives ; Pages 17-18. 2 . Policy Statement, Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Page 4; Section 4A-2, The Community. 1 } PLANNING DEPARTMEP'' PRELIMINARY REPORI ) THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : March 24, 1981 DR . DAVID WOODCOCK : l! R-015-81 ; SP-016-81 PAGE THREE I . IMPACT ON TIHIE NATURAL OR HOMMANI ENVIRONMENT: 1. Natural Systems : Future paving of the site will remove the vegetation and cause an increase in storm water runoff and traffic and noise levels in the area . Proper development controls and procedures should mitigate these impacts, however . 2 . Population/Employment : Minor 3. Schools : Not applicable 4. Social : Minor 5 . Traffic : No real increase in vehicle trips can be expected as the proposed improvements will only be accommodating already existing traffic. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance was issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee on March 4 , 1981 . K . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of1Renton Building Division . 2 . City of 'Renton Engineering Division. 3 .. City of ,Renton Traffic Engineering Division . . 4. City of ;Renton Utilities Division. 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: REZONE 1. The rezone request is generally consistent with the high, density multiple family designation of the Comprehensive Plan for the site and surrounding area . 2 . The proposed rezone and use is generally consistent with the R-3 parcels and clinic use on the east . • side of Pelly Avenue and the P-1 zoning and similar clinic use on the property adjacent to the south. 3 .. The subject site has retained its R-2 classification since the zoning ordinance was adopted in 1953. This would suggest that the designation has not been specifically considered in a previous area zoning or land use analysis other than the Compre- hensive Plan of 1965 . 4. On November 19, 1979, a rezone from R-2 to R-3. was approved at 110 Pelly Avenue North for a clinic (and associated parking) use to the east of the subject site. (R-364-79) 5. Items L-2 through L-4 appear to indicate that the subject site is potentially zoned for the R-3 classi- fication lrequested (Section 4-3014-C) . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TI lE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : Mari.. 24 , 1981 DR . DAVID WOODCOCK : R-015-81 ; SP-016-81 PAGE FOUR SPECIAL PERMIT 1 . The applicant proposes to remove the existing dwelling 1 on 123 Pelly Avenue North and utilize the space for additional parking stalls associated with the clinic use at 115 - 121 Pelly Avenue North. 2 . The existing clinic of +3,800 square feet requires 19 parking stalls . The site plan as submitted indicates that 20 stalls will be provided. 3. Section 4-2204-8B ( 1) of the Parking and ,Loading Ordinance requires a minimum five foot landscape buffer between those sides of a parking lot that are adjacent to land used and/or zoned for residen- tial purpose . The property adjacent to the north is so classified and the site plan indicates such a buffer . However , the Engineering Division has advised that the new curb cut for Lot No . 4 must be located 5 feet from the property line. In order to meet this standard, the landscaping requirement, the 24 feet aisle and the 20 feet stall length provisions of the Parking and Loading Ordinance, it will be necessary to reverse the parking stall alignment . Such an adjustment would bring the site plan into compliance with these standards . (See exhibit for illustration) In addition , a detailed landscaping plan will have to be submitted to and approved by the Building Department. 4. The parking lot should be considered as an integral part of the medical clinic , since it brings the facility into compliance with the Parking and Loading Ordinance . If the property were covenanted to require that Lots 2 , 3, an.d 4 could only be sold together, modification of the parking lot would not .be required per Section 4-2204( 2)A which addresses driveway locations . This has the advantage over reversing the parking lot in that it saves a major spruce tree (40 feet high) at the northeast corner of the site . 5 . Storm drainage installation and improvement of the alley from the subject site to North First Street will be required as per Engineering comment . Also the existing driveways in front of Lots 2 and 3 must be closed. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: m REZONE Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the requested rezone be approved . SPECIAL PERMIT Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the requested special permit be approved subject to the following: ' PLANNING DEPARTMF-- PRELIMINARY REPOT f0 THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : March 24, 1981 ' DR . DAVID WOODCOCK : R-015-81 ; SP-016-81 PAGE FIVE 1 . Filing of restrictive covenants limiting subsequent sale of Lot No. 4 to be linked to the sale of the clinic located on Lots No . 2 and 3 per analysis point L-4. 2 . Submitted to and approved by the Building Depart- ment , a detailed landscape plan. 3 . Satisfaction of the Engineering Division requirements as per L-4. ......, \ I gri Iwo rim ver 1 • •• .3 ,,,„•-,-: r.:,,P . 1. Zwl ' jII 01 : 1 et!. Z. 3, ) , , pA,CiFiC co.R. & FOUNDRY CO , • c , - ."-- ,Zi, , :'l• i 1 .al,i, _in 51, MI :11,••• •,. 03‘4 \ 1 .,..' I ,()Arloar(),11,-/r. ilir.,s2,9>i,tosip• Inrywrewmri..,ai.' .1,1. • , r,w NW XI opt, , .... R-4 _ I, ram go tird .4' / 4)? ‘ Aw,ar: ..71 I/ .ritsw. AM tn.im . n.',U) LEM. fil•11100 40 rn =IL', 54 -41,Im' 0, •gm . 5rAcmdm) ,... r,.f,. . ,,,nix, , .,,_j.,, . ,uswanas„.... ; f.121= I!!-111-11111 . ft• ,,... _ce , , i487-4114-11,4---,.,:? , :/ ,1 ' -%,-- -. .' r:z... ..1 . iiiiiiiiiii / f : t 6,* "'" ' 4,7"11116' Vit ill'TI-.1.1f .1.47,r,i: `-1.1'7_71ii:i iv" iimiii,' / , . IQ ' 'ill? i I '1.1* .*' ' -6- . , ii.r.d.9!, 4,am. A,:...11. ;TIM- ,iido i L -,r7 ,- ,,_,,. -.... ,,,,....'4' -,,, ---t,,,,,..,;i0,-....4..11.,,ill. ,,,,,„. , ./ . / . f. \•,,,,,,-,\\--,-,,,,,.. ,,,,, 1(...\ k . \ 1, , • ' ,,. - •N • ' Ale/ ,i,alli 4 - ii ii'' ... ItM.:1',....4 hi mogla.-^%,Obi* : :1,,,,..,1 ,... :V..1R.,:r;4 kr i 't' ' i I' .•,:• .4-,f, 4-• '', ',... . t,-..-16-1 v.=mi- ...."iv, ,....-py,-,?„.., ,..11 :.11...-.4"0,i'4,,,.1••. ;I'm...JINNI ' ,' .,,,D ,w,,Ga ..,-,Ala il •,...jwin• ''t''''''7.W / 6 .1' :Zirl= 017.17.00' t`',...r, .',....r., ir,.4,...•Vr4 :am an ,time 'l•-•."....'N,„. i.i . 4 ;i1,:k47. II i"'"4:".,4....I.,.willpi.•„,,""• 1:‘,...orman •,,,„,,-4,11.41.Ch. • '' ' %.* ''''' **,.. 7 III sr,J.'i -- ..am ' ffiffigrr,••:.4_,..,..,..= girt ••• •••• r.- -x. f ... .., -, ix,.. -, , iiii a ..ii m,..,;;;,:71''' .-.i..!,•,-1:4 'im.m. ,....j.......%, .: , ,;, 1.:71 ..- ., v.,, .. ., . -. -.1.41.476. 11;ra.11 1, ;,*4.-.•, :1: 3,), ...f... , ( ,..,. --- ia, -I.- ,"' ii on •••ow tio or, n• 1111411Mil •• • 11.-'111•••"/ , , A -ilta.i,.,. $ ,,,, •,,,. , u. 4, iffl .:71.1 on lei, 2',4,41111111M ...r .1.• • ,..r.i..• ..... -., :WI , / A r.. ? N.\`,--,40 4011 ,,,,,,„, ley-. 1 .1 ,,,..•..... 1 ,... . , .. . ri••:..'. ,71 Ir. mr ... .t.,-.._ ..,,,P4‘," lo,lr- .4 ...40",,, 7 ,- ' •'..- ' '..-.4 is• . . - .- 11 .b I iilii . ' -ity ..,...• I ...-....„.... , • '',111R •45 1141 III . , , .. ,is ,,,,, 2 NO, 1''''' ..'`''I •, '. grAIII Z•11..,_.."1.111.111 311-i,•,,.'7,r--1-ii• ' . 1 l' ,.._ in.1 ikrirMIIIMAIIIIIIIIII '1" Li' 2 1.1 Migli ' g' ' /I mil .,4, 4k4 . 4 \0110,1`11, u IN I. a I ...11.. ,.....i 1 • -el P:' p 1 ,/ , • _ 37- ..1 . : .m4. rn.. ,k•• • 'I'.%,,, ‘ ‘' .w40.48.. ,,. qs . ,i '..1.1 1: . ,.. .,,,.. , - in a . NMI MIMI memo •, N, '''',N ,qr Art Er. 11111.111111 imullil =IIMIN mii... „, 1 • , c * ___.i 1 ..., •ri .. Maori imp 1•1 •B• ' .11N•mti MUM= Willi allailk" „‘,.• MIMI' rWi.M. 711.7:06 Mem maiir_a: , ,, „•„„. . ,e / 1 Ls" ,v-z.• . ma:6w moon mini nir.,-., •,," ••, , // - ..'' -I ' R-2 To. ---4 ..., ---. lir "lavarl 01.101 crsCri,if niellh.',,,,,,. ••,-". • • -1 4 .• HIG" 'W'0,1litili . lin WM°_ FILtdri WI Sco4001. Scnooi_ ark..rwinot rmimr- rumor 01111.1.210 •I' ,11.1a1 row -,..... ,•• ' am Per • ' •• . . ° ",,-•• ,- , cimi-....- . MB Uri 'I•11: "-IN' •.B.:-11 mr MiNillti '''''''.---'' ^' ,0411- •- < -Triq*...„.-,..,...c ......u., frical rfilr, riiir: fni....n. rum wri.rIMII•fl :.,alrillu- ....r....4....i,;,7 MN..., ,rW.Zo Tie 71r4 mor'w. •rir••••e: rams.- ,"-- s ,mil h.- • - i-•• ••.•,ffri 'haw ,,na:• mr.;ar mauturi mu:-••••• may- '''r .. Mill 11111PI ii;A§ ea him 'awn -:.--0,, ---''''' ,-".., giitil ` '' • . . ' ---- _ 7 7 Irv, ittslike ---n.y- ram ,meow-Fig Mr riZialrl CM?..,r, PI' ,,,,, MI ,, r.....07",r Or.........41 r ...1.111 111.1 \if, ..„..... .._.,,,,,...„.......,.....„.....___-.,.„........s____.....„... ----• - • 01 mi.r34 ..••• •nmin mu. ...,-- Ull iNse,mr-. CBE'lora ram,,d . Fa.,mit, I MIIIIIr;''II"Mr' 9.. jilt! ma 4 r -mi C 4111 I MARA NIL :r_E:111.,0 Fra al, :I=we, me.mom.. elZ.310 4.1.1 1011 r,rdismo RIZ" j 111111 a.. pg.. i M , leilok µAim" , , mc. 'zillti...-z cm-, --mir urn I-W,eon Fzi tifirt .0-,,,,, 57.4,1..= 11r, aihili. ' sun Wm Inn :,,L.,1 1,1 -...mr,c4irs•iim7.,,,,,mr,f., .„,-.. .0......., a nil ir la at i '4ral,,mar tatiall.2 ;LI mir' pr 1,00. ,..e,,sailirs::al 1111 im n, :ral• ., JWRI... ,_. •.• . ,\,...E. Nal z , : t ' lum "•_.",01'.i".1.... 4 juo 17 db---_,a,yr;ark.vpi,-* ;1.,...r- , Imo•"...m.-5, Bs I, spit!IF ...•=14416.1111 IsLionti,•:„.4..amiri P Am iw,, 1)% .•.,. p= H . a \\ , Lail.."l .7-4.;.• > Er -1 ‘ .• , ,L, 42,1. riur ord L,-.. 1.-ia i in,g. a,-•••-.,!•,...;••-•,•-r 4 Wm -1‘ , i gm I ....,1„,.• ,..i.mr,,, b.,,. 4 lox ,•?. :It,-.P7••••,‘• ,-,rw,lik.•t• MN'IL.1 • I \ \ r AL.•rim 7.-,,,,-,,,LL ' ,,......" ow Mai 171111814 r ---. air,2 srIr, or- yr,' • Milt dii tar m,j, Eniiiirc... ur. 41.....-III 49 El• ,...1 .....,..., ,,... , . v ,, :, ,,,. i...,.., . sr° J.111 llo• • ,. .ii • !Li'. ,,L........, cm. .,Ma :mum ,,, Ca min • „ ''' . \ ala4111111' 1.; absi...- am.;it.; r... ft.. comic=, coif:lir Tai mi.7 ' am 4E2 .• SIB - 40 Iwo.) ,,;•,,,..In•p, rims inn„Lib. mil .rinal rim \ \ IN so cmr imr, NNE 4,- : ,.., m. 01.,...:•_+.,rm mr,Ima,.- r..... • nia ir.r., dom...4 1.-- rwah..;.. 0=111M2 In.11:17 JZ LLI. eallit s - ' ) ..ir•our a,• mr• yr Pi.'•rcr-Z.- 011Mmenr ,....,fix, „im.iv\ Inina mc-.. MIN CM- illm ZEE Edi I.zo TWIN.. - X.Clit ' stir p.1 , _ rali'm; .„..r. . , ,14, ...•••••• v.--,A.,.. •:E.29Est, ,.I.L.,Mal ' EIN'INV INIM'Amink4' 3111-.%Mr.lir- r11111"il. 11; i4 1 113::El \ \ cia Nor' 11,a,u., '• _,..X. CM IL"' "MIME MEOW i•Arl • •,, I ir • 0 11..• /1 -.jos'14111 II i2.-w-Aft..‘ ...1.1, PM.. , , ‘, , I up; ilim.„.., nib.INie EN r A II 0 , . ‘ \ „I I gin Mimi -... 1 '',... -us m•-• I EllS•me..7:"..: .74-: % • \ , , IIIIN ow: nor-4or 44 4. "ir Ail. Imo ET: IX Mr. low A ' • I .41. '-- 111211 .:• Ariii;p 41• • ' •111,1112 1111 Emir, rim mi IIIIW ,,,, „ L . - •, •.• • - ' .t.,, ,,,, ll'',4•, ..••4 • 'e,•,',.. --'''' • ^ - . ' • . 1 I . 5 APPLICANT DAVID G. WOODCOCK, JR . TOTAL AREA +- P000 sq . ft . PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Pelly Avenue North EXISTING ZONING R-2, Resdience two family ; minl. lot size 7 ,200 sq . ft . • EXISTING USE Single Family Dwellings PROPOSED USE Rezone to R-3 ; Special Permit for parking lot High Density Multiple Family COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN 11 i COMMENTS 1( • , I (i ( . i 2 y/g/ Planning - 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : PCZOAW le-6/S-49) t . 1o(7iAL tVgiVirerix-e/te'�� �r vie e A ti eki'a :nj e60 lc-: f* 7L6/41• 3) J0 3 / y — Location : ®y @ . Applicant: Albode ch, Or. At fed TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : W Police Department 90044. MEETING DATE : Public Works Department E.R.C. If " 3ftliaL- ngineering Division Traffic Engineering I Building Division Utilities Engineering 1 Fire Department (Other) : COMME Is TS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITIf�G FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEAS PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved X Approved with Conditions Not Approved C-61=4-2- e-/-1L'a °t4/11-e-6 "--=. (-74. 11--- e*r FA" -- z213 - ) .ram. - y) ,ice . a4 s eike,_ 02,,,,e47At,..,___( Signature of Director or Authorized ep esentat ' v fL'�\u Date c yl 1�+ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions it Not Approved I i , 1 Signatre of Director or Authorized Representative Date . _...- - ,- , . .7 •:. . • • . . %.' . . * •. . . `••. '''.1 . • . - IStY'—'7- . - ' . • . 1.-ANP6CAPIN& • -6f2 zx fang&-AL.LnY r__ ouamor erri _ • . . Pgut4 us A.U-rum.a.U5-2v1;ctu.Siett • - - ------ it AT cipecAt aporerah..• • 5rcorm oeuNiteas PM.— 1„! 1 15.1 I • • . • 1 . ' 1 cmy OP esictig eti.assob. • t ig . or 4'fac•-37as,rstigarz g 1 I i Oc iektopcoaimozosi sd-sc: A.AccOsro . . i .1 •• .• L Astsea eerwas0 A.soznabo e NW pax muck'. . ,,,.. i . R .111, t..13 , I.• • s.pus4rr saecaacimkar ulrn4 Mir WiJisolig-I Ve*Itak02b. i' 5.1 • t.e.041.4..T-1 ba, . . 0 o • 1:I 1 ',.• VW& . _ • . f"--,,,—...EXISTINC CLINIC DUILDIKI6b — e • / . 1 L. ONO STOW/-ToTAL.AXE*..3,ESooeug . 1 ler.Q 1 WELLS Ad.N. . • ....-...--I I. 7.-....Cip 1 I . 1 . .• .• 1 ) I . .. .{ 1 . . • T—. ii• " • PiZoRDSED PD.CK.0.1b 1. .8 `.1J15 . I• . _ TIL ect.sTINCo o..uac..I 7 • _ ._ t I a . , , . . t 5 M --'=--=, • TO es .- 7.rt-11 -f-.- - 1 j A 1 , _ - • • -7_ I 4% LI -7-- fi. . 1 1 • . . FIELLy mis.M. • s , / . , •••,- W111111tb, ' ,A . — Wit..31a.. grim Lilir 9 HOLI shavr. _ ,1 --: VICINITY MAP Ntorna ) 1 gz I I si 4 tf/IP ._. .4 • , . J — - • EX ITINC.v 5PIZIX.E i • • . LOT 2 • C, LOTS .‘f\iLN L T • Aplik.'&41rit • r • To gEAAAI14*401 gm, • it •••-•...7-.4:77t.." . . ,E.. el.- 1- .4- Ka- -..a- ...L.. . . t.es•I cuco CUT. . . - . • • • ! 1 , • o 6 to 20 3o 40 50 .4MiWel-140g11- . us_____ __ . . __tor*mc..T.4.,tasi.rot4 - - -15512511 pLA N .i. Pei..i..y AVE. W. . •i• I . • I 1, . , . . , . , t • . • . . , ti -- '-, .<• . cur.0 car -- cues cur -- -. . / . _ .- „ , • ---. - - - - - _ - - . •, .. . . . • . . . . . • • . • . . - . . . 0r r ; - ,.....:A, ,r,nrl • '? ) • • . • : .. N. ell. hiii ‘... c.j.` 1--:-",-,i_i 'CD 0 • - . . •Z-\ • . . , • , • , . .1 FEB 19 1981 . , 1 . RewTos.1 _‘t lag I VT114ti House faX15-TuJ6,PUP. • . ^0 ......... Prom/cLair. 1 • . . E; .-- • . . .•............ .!.... --- „t-__ 4. . • • — •--- , . — _ _ ,---- . -•. .. . . ! Ili •. . . . ._,.. - . r . . i __ . . . . ___._____ •:.,:_, . • . .. . ... , . • 4fJ / / Planni i ' 12-197! RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET o Ap p l i c a t i on : PCZ®�1 � 9-A if) e' (/ L P‘teii/ieSon�1�` l • 6 • ° R. a Vtai• 3.) Location : 1a 3 Aiii, le .,/, PPlicant : •g� TO: Par s Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :3Arrio0 I Police Department . MEETING DATE : Public Works Department EIR•e• 6e II 34/51/421 i Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN W ITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DI;VISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO A TEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:Ou P .M. ON . • RHV,IEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE i 11 xxx Approved _ Approved with Conditions Not Approved This is a much needed improvement in the area. 0 Lt. D. G� rsson 1 � 3/3/8 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Siglnature of Director or Authorized Representative Date amml 61 7 WV Planning 12-1979. RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIE41 SHEET Application : ec2®N (R.&lf e.:SpEemi. (wives/1-61 .(9") • e_e.ret ev eal l.'ra j c6el ems, fR a 1 O A. 3) Location : /4 3 ': Ur Acee • Q G Applicant : iftiociejegbefel iikr. e. we/ TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED NEARING DATE :440 i, Police Department 1,A94N4. 'MEETING DATE : Public Works Department 6. .e; le n 42friar.' Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division I l tilities Engineering /Fire Department i I (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION . REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC), TO BE HELD ON AT 9:00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE' ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE Tp A TEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON • v REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : c—F I � = ,I 1 Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved ( __) ( , i: --2..._), / .. 4-2,5'47` Signature o Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : (,!(lu L( 06pr. 1 1/7 Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved A ' t , eiL— Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 47JV/ A Planni 12-197 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : CZO - e Ee L s 'CoG • s • • • • Location : /�3 P` l® y`� v ' • gyp®n Applicant : Q�+� '' /� V�t`, �c®de®te1 _Dr • ,4,. tee' TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE411g44 Police Department 4t44k MEETING DATE : Public Works Department EQR,C. 4a/Joat En M-6ering Division d Traffic Engineering _ Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN IRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. F YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON • EVIEWING. DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /2 t •�J,� �-�r�=r /� Approved I Approved with Conditions Not Approved k/ j:<4 �J = �'Lu\ D. -- Pi -\ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative" Date LL REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date /#7 'fgill Planni nc 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : 4;ZO o - e z-M i. / s • • • • o Location : h23 et e . Applicant : wo.d4peedei Dr. _.' = tor; Parks Department �, . TO: P SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : :' ,r ;r , Police Department ok4h4, MEETING DATE : Public Works Department , .Ca ..cm'; Engineering Division Tr .f�fi c Engineering IV - Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO AITEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :01) P .M. ON ' r REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : �� �� Ste , Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved ii • /' ' ' 7 Signatur . /---72(--- e of -I) ector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions ' Not Approved• Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s) : R-015-81, SP-016-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-019-81 Description of Proposal: Request to rezone site from R-2 to R-3 in order to secure approval of a special permit to allow use of site for parking associated with an adjacent clinic . Proponent: David G. Woodcock, Jr. Location of Porposal: . 123 Pelly Avenue North Lead Agency: Planning Department � f This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on March 4, 1981, following a presentation by Steve Munson of the Planning Department. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-019-81 are the following: 1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: March 4, 1981 2) Applications: R-015-81, SP-016-81 /3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Police Department Utilities Engineering Department Fire Department Engineering Department Traffic Engineering Department Building Department Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC had-determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c) . , This decision was made after -review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely affect adjacent properties. Signatures: 401L R nald G. Nelson, David R. Clemens, Acting Building Director'; Planning Director Ili hard Hou hton, ,Act' g P blic Works Directo DATE OF PUBLICATION: March 8, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: March 22, 1981 . - IOF 1VA, A. ®o W THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o 1 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR e PLANNING DEPARTMENT C 235- 2550 09gT�0 March 6, 1981 Mr. David G. Woodcock, Jr. 115 Pelly Avenue North Renton, Washington 98055 Re: David G. Woodcock, Jr. ; File Nos. R-015-81 and SP-016-81 ; Applications for rezone from R-2 to R-3 and special permit to allow parking lot addition for existing adjacent medical/dental clinic; property located at 123 Pelly Avenue North. Dear Mr. Woodcock: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above ( mentioned application on February 23 , 1981 . .A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for March 24 , 1981 , at 9 : 00 a.m. ( Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours, 116(11.4?-(2.---&-7L,04 Roger J. Blaylock Associate Planner I , RJB:gh -,..k., , t..;•t: ::,,,, 7 "lvit- ,,::, ,,...,. _. ili A,A i:,• •4'•• ..... ilt:'• p*;,": 1.1 eP,F.''''''' .:-',"-.' :.' ...: • -.: ..,v ,— -•,-- ,•,, . .: -.",` ".,4'f, 4:, -‘4, ,•§„,,- 1.401 4% ',41, ,A '1`, : ,-..44,..'i•.::.'-••• "... -•1:1, ..• ,,.t -4 ' ,, , • - . ' • '''',n,,,.. -•.1• ,-, •:t.:,:t...",, ', . ,,.r.''; ., ,•'-'. ;•,; . f ..•,, • ...• • ; 'tr.t.tt"•' - , ' .1.', ,,' • ' - ' `` ; , .. = 4,liv-z-o.'1 '-. ' •.' I, ,,, , 1 ,‘:... . '',-,4.,;0-.. :. -, .. A "''' '''';ci%e 4,1 ' r ',t1, ' ' - . .. t iP, V'• ' . GENERAL LOCATION:' KA, 'Ikvi-s'. ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED AT 123 PELLY AVENUE NORTH- . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL 'DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT. , . . , . i S POSTED To NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF V A-• ,'..0' a a ::'!.. rail". .-•: ',.;:-;• J' 1.1,‘7,,., ,..4,4*• x ,,,a1.. a Tli, '4'•A"'r• la",r7ja' :‘k '-.r • 1 TO ',---E HELD,i IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING , . ON MARCH_...1193 2 L if;EGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P. , , . ctioNcERt1; G ITEM Eve - R-015-81 - R-2 TO R-3 - SP-016-81 - TO ALLOW PARKING ''...)11 ., :..., • ,,,,, . •. .....• , ,..„ ., ‘,. . . LOT ADDITION i' E .,, ,.,„ ,. iji* 1. 4.' • , .,., i''''-'4, ''', •`,!!• . ,•:, •,:,,, .,,,t. ..,: .,,k, .,:: lle, AL „„ ;••.,.:. ,; .,,, '. k.'i 0 AGEm. EN s PERMI1 DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE - DIRECT APPEALS TO HEARING EXAMINER 1 ,,,-,:,,.. • . . • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 ' THIS NOTICE NOT TO 4., . BE RE..4.VED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON MARCH 24, 1981, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. EDEN ESTATES (MARK HECOCK AND PETER TIERSMA) Applications for preliminary plat approval of 11-lot single family subdivision, file PP-079-80, and exceptions from the Subdivision Ordinance regarding access to allow a cul-de-sac of 700 feet in length along with a reduced width of 25 feet and the creation of three pipestem lots, files E-021-81, E-022-81, and E-023-81; property located on the north side of N.E. 28th Street between Kennewick Place N.E. and Aberdeen Avenue N.E. 2. , y J R. Applications for rezone from R-2 to R-3, file R-015-81, and special permit to allow parking lot addition for existing adjacent medical/dental clinic, file SP-016-81; property located at 123 Pelly Avenue North Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 24, 1981, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: March 8, 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 6th day of March, 1981. 7//lUrtwlenA SIGNED: NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects: 1. CHARLES, UNGER (ECF-624-80) Application for Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit, file no. SM-87-80, to allow construction of 20 ' x 20 ' deck; property located at 3717 Lake Washington Boulevard North. 2. DAVID G. WOODCOCK, JR. (ECF-019-81) Application for rezone, file no. R-015-81, from R-2 to R-3 and special permit, file no. SP-016-81, to allow parking lot addition for existing adjacent medical/dental clinic; property located at 123 Pelly Avenue North The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has further issued a declaration of significance for the following project: 1. EMILIO AND RICHARD PIEROTTI (ECF-017-81) Application for special permit, file no. SP-013-81, to fill 8 } acres with material from PACCAR, which would consist of dirt and iron scrap; property located in the vicinity of 3315 Talbot Road South Further information regarding these actions is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by March 22 , 1981. Published: MARCH 8, 1981 NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION PROPOSED ACTION FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-2 TO R-3 AND SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW PARKING LOT ADDITION, FILE NO(s) R-015-81 and SP-016-81 GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS PROPERTY LOCATED AT 123 PELLY AVENUE NORTH POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE C E.R.C. 3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION, ❑DOES MDES NOT, HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRON- MENT. A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, QWILL HILL NOT, BE REQUIRED. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., MARCH 22, 1981 • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION rl FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : R-015-81, SP-016-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-019-81 Description of Proposal: Request to rezone site from R-2 to R-3 in order to secure approval of a special permit to allow use of site for parking associated with an adjacent clinic . Proponent: David G. Woodcock, Jr. Location of Porposal: 123 Pelly Avenue North Lead Agency: Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on March 4, 1981, following a presentation by Steve Munson of the Planning Department. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-019-81 are the following: 1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: March 4, 1981 2) Applications: R-015-81, SP-016-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Police Department ilities Engineering Department Fire Department Engineering Department Traffic Engineering Department Building Department Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance : Will not adversely affect adjacent properties. Signatures: "1 4( ?•/.--(1‘ ' /dirilt7 11/6-'etuft- Ronald G. Nelson, David R. Clemens, Acting Building Director Planning Director Richard Houghton, Act "g Public Works Directo DATE OF PUBLICATION: March 8, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: March 22, 1981 Datecirculated : �,,,��16W Comments due : /�/�/ a ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEU SHEET ECF - - AL APPLICATION No (s ) . —®/�= ,570 ` 1:9/C / PROPONENT : ®dc®ek r. DeWl, PROJECT TITLE : g �® e- -�}W- '/ "eArlitr. Brief Description of Project : /2",csieri- re2.0-$4.e 4,11-0 �- era gels A• tv�,-L r .,tom ee* 7Co ceru�•�„ �'vr exos c�ivtr� LOCATION : / 3 A'// e. . SITE AREA : 1: _5-040ziEP BUILDING AREA (gross ) ---- DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : ; 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : xxx 14 ) Public services : xxxxx 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : This parking lot would be an improvement to the area and is very much needed. Recommendation : DNSI xxx DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : Lt�; Persson Title : Date : 3/3/81 FORM: ERC-06 D to circulated : �y l Comments due : 3/�19/ 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - e/q - lee__ APPLICATION No (s ) . P-404.s4/ 5A— Qg6 SI PROPONENT : M64/COCk� Or. Atvd, PROJECT TITLE : 6 i '�44/l - 2 //9L ii4gAiii/T Brief Description of Project : I ay„eS7F6r reaaxe lc-air.4 cLvin 4' 3 C c cca ��/ 1perib 7v.�.(6ir I.�',•.•f�lee 7'laferu�ee4n eK,s1, clinr,c r LOCATION : la Pe /y Aye. /c'. SITE AREA : fi Spp19-46° BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : �-- IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE k INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : ) Direct/Indirect air quality : Water & water courses : Plant life : G Animal life : / 6) Noise : � 7 ) Light & glare : !/ 8 ) Land Use ; north : ..Sinj/feptz;rrld)V east : J!i r+7(6"Etk km i Y r C/.'ir(`ci south : G4'neG II �� west : sjn.t(L9 ��r44'( /7 N�e P Land use conflicts : // 4- View obstruction : f 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : /2<:- _ 11 ) Population/Employment : _v 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : . /� 14) Public services : 15 ) Energy : /.. '"---- 16 ) Utilities :' 17 ) Human health : v"---- 18 ) Aesthetics : /•!// 19 ) Recreation : �/ , 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : J 4,"t r( 4,4 uce 4 no✓ ms flesve ��.-- - . / // c c 4.5 . Recommendation : DNSI !/ DOS More Information Reviewed by : ir6' / itgo Title : 4i5‘tl /Finder Date : 314dgl FORM: ERC-06 trind-(7( Date circulated : 0 1n/g f Comments due : 3 419( ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REJIE J SWEET ECF - (/f - APPLICATION No (s ) , P-®/i= $/ c' .5)4— /C / PROPONENT : Modeoek/ Dgc Vic/ PROJECT TITLE : gb—A®4/e— -1-y;00--6// /J A it Brief Description of Project : g`o wits,,,- re2- ‹. A,., 4Q ach3 /4.._ e. c f fd ! o 67 1,' 6,,,,...I r- iA w' ®der ci,• 0 l'K e s'4 f C lip B C_ LOCATION : 11,93 Argke., /41r. SITE AREA : 1 „50,®11ci ° BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : ,-- IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : j 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : _ v/ 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : ✓ 5 ) Animal life : V 6) Noise : , ✓ 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : t 9 ) Natural resources : ✓ 10 ) Risk of upset : ✓ 11 ) Population/Employment : ✓ 12 ) Number of Dwellings : ✓ 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : , 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : ✓ _ 17 ) Human health ✓ 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : ✓ CFO ) Archeology/history : OMMENTS : Recommendation : P SI ✓ DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : 11 _ i itle : L " 6- SPEC• a t e : 3/1/9 ORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 64;/ Comments due : ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEU SHEET ECF - 0/7 - APPLICATION No (s ) . J, � PROPONENT :-��y®dC®C 1)4y0'®W PROJECT TITLE : E � /r Brief Description of Project : ,Q6 ,«'f f,-- ,-e o,a„ 'crzv.a1Q y sae-tyaipe ,•� ,4111°"41r. F-lc� ley�� ®��r,,,•�� �� �>�;S ,� ct;�`� LOCATION : /9 3 PeC/y Av .410. 14r. SITE AREA : ®r'=-1,41Vicr' BUILDING AREA (gross ) ----- DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : ✓ 3 ) Water & water courses : ✓ 4 ) Plant life : 7 / 5 ) Animal life : V 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : V 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : J ' 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : V 19 ) Recreation : I 4 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DOS More Information Reviewed by : Title : Date : �2 FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 2p6/53 / Comments due : /9/0gi ENVICB®NNE1 JTAL Qi1EEKLIST REWUIEU SHEET ECF - - APPLICATION No (s ) . P-®/f / .570-- (alC PROPONENT : /, dch1 Dr, Day/c/ PROJECT TITLE : g �:::94/e— Brief Description of Project : ja7,e5yc6.,r 5-pct.:a iperipvcitioy I,"j 11, fe r e e14......__CL___4_511PLI:C..- LOCATION : /a 3 R // Aye. A', SITE AREA : F' _5-,,®ei' BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : _ t/ 3 ) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : i f 9 ) Natural resources : !/ 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : v . 16 ) Utilities :' 17 ) Human health : c� 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : v b I20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI X DOS More Information, Reviewed by : / litle : Date 1ORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : _,-,,p64; / Comments due : 3/ / / EtwVIROWIEJTAL CHECKLIST RE16IE U SHEET ECF - - g1 APPLICATION No (s ) . P—D/f- / etc-*/ PROPONENT : po4/Gdsc 64 / r, bettiBd PROJECT TITLE : gbg34/e- 146A41111r Brief Description of Project : 12 ,e$1 r - reao-K.e tnA4--„/. D c -ez eel • //I v oai a r v«�',-e-�a 1 B� ? fer tier a Lt ai eX a`s V 7 c 1,i LOCATION : Ic9 ,3 P��i P. m SITE AREA : It _5-040z27.1712' BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : �--- IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : • 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : TYIP ei-•d5 e2,4, traffic impacts : 1,v I HA Pr��G 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI // DOS More Information Reviewed by : e� Title : Date : — v'- I FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 2fly6/3 l Comments due : 36//9® ENVIRONMENITAL CHEEKLIST RE4UIEU SHEET ECF - - APPLICATION No (s ) . —D/�= � ,,/4- €9/C PROPONENT : � ®�C®� DoL veth PROJECT TITLE : ,g�.�0/J/b"-- 4-;„ --990—// L1 ,1‘)e-Aniit Brief Description of Project : la ,cs7t ,r- ,c°2exe +rr. cLoto 4 c %R et-4 #.( ��Pt l e(er ',' e Gin eK s c LOCATION : / 3 i4//y ,441(e. olr. SITE AREA : �� / BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : ✓--- IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : L 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 1 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : �\ 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : _ COMMENTS : • Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : ��-` title : Date : fl FORM: ERC-06 A • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MARCH 4 , 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10: 00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS: NORTHWEST COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE COMPANY (AUSTIN COMPANY) (ECF-602-80; SA-092-80) FRED BOWSER (ECF-642-80; R-135-80) DAVE BEST (ECF-634-80; R-125-80) FOR RECONSIDERATION: HOMECRAFT LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC. (ECF-013-81; SA-010-81) NEW BUSINESS: ECF-020-81 H. A. AND JANET BLENCOE SA-017-81 Application for site approval to V-019-81 allow expansion of medical/dental facility through second floor addition and application for variance from Parking and Loading Ordinance regarding parking requirements; property located at 138, 200, and 206 South 3rd Place ECF-624-80 CHARLES R. UNGER SM-87-80 Application for Shoreline Manage- ment Substantial Development Permit to allow construction of 20 ' x 20 ' deck; property located at 3717 Lake Washington Boulevard North ECF-017-81 EMILIO AND RICHARD PIEROTTI SP-013-81 Application for special permit to fill 8+ acres with material from PACCAR, which would consist of dirt and iron scrap; property located in the vicinity of 3315 Talbot Road South ECF-019-81 DAVID G. WOODCOCK, JR. R-015-81 Applications for rezone from R-2 to R-3 and special permit to allow parking lot addition for existing adjacent medical/dental clinic; property located at 123 Pelly Avenue North _ .• ENVIRONMENTAL R-L,_LEW COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING - MARCH 4, 1981 . _ - 1 CITY OF RENTON 1. _ 4-,• c 6., ”,",,, :-. ""' ir ; ,-n '''''' (--- , l'---\-"------ ' - - - - -- - ..,..,,, t 41 . UNGER / 17 - 1 ___ _ _ 1 A ir 4 . . c'm '7 4,t;,, ..,-; A 1 I .1 -tj , (IE k 1 1--1 V-g t, '„..) .,' e ‘" „ CF-624 .41',.:::' ''..,i, I —1 - . "et • II\ .- MAY c\ ''--'\' , . •„f \ • , CR ‘,." EEK s, ' MIMI IT, k-r N1- \....... 1 „....... .....___ / 1 5\.,-' • f, I ....... . k , 1 II 1_, 69 N.N.',...„............N.\ ---1 — ft,ry 1 Al\Nei/11mm g,V1 i , r , , 4.___ ...''-'--.--•=1,: ..,.--_' .0,,,,G l' 'CEDAR RIVER• 1 , , 11 '. •\-\- --,- \.' r 1 L.'7N ‘),\"•---____J . , ,Irl vk , i 1 A — 013-81)171 _...--- I ta- t..._ — •4 I , 7?,} t, ,.,„ , , . , ,-.. li) --, • VI- I I it. I BLACK • .... : A' Zif —111 1=H---' i I 1 I ,17-__------ 1 SPR I NGBROOK -,/ 7. ' il L .V...L., ' 4 I \ , , ; ,1>1.1- , CREEK - 4i'' __ r'-' ..___ I - A' - .i.'--` , _ .,'". -7:1-7"-# -ilia,, i„/".: //I .) . - ..k.. :ow -1jji \ rri-- 7--HCI --- .4 a I I lip•-__ ,'''-. 1 kedil,a AU S. Ik . I , V lt ; ] , 4-', .._ -1--r---.-- tui i 1 , , , , . . , /' ' -T- 1 1 I ' it' ' 7-41 1411 I : ' 1 I IEROTTIII i f ' 1 -V „oiri 1 I . , •' t 1 p mi EST (EC -6 )_____34 8p 1 \ i . fl GREEN g '.4:4L 1 BOWS R (i CP-6-42-Ei 0) t" I . , -r-f--- : ; I ) ) aa ; 4 TH 1 ' _ - LAKE I r 1 < 1 Il YOUNGS. I i I i 11 1 1 ill P 1 1 \ i Uri CITY OF RENTON '� f'� APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FEB A 9 1981 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY __ <<>�,� File No . SP- 62/(i)— Date Rec' d. �� Dwpi\ • Application Fee $ Receipt No . Environmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1 . Name V‘'0 �, l,�C�? ,7c (m. Phone 2 Address 1 L - 2 . Property location 12.3 FELk2f f� 3. Legal description (attach additional' sheet if necessary) L-Ok •�-� Cal 2 Revnksv. Fa-vv. t , APPL1J fie. - �.•-S 4 . Number of acres or square feet `I_D L- Present Zoning a9 g 2. 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? 1(kr -Ve ac,Co- - r- --4 Ae-AoS, \�,n��s li c - i Z ire-i17 6 . Thefollowinq information shall be submitted with this application : A. , Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale ! existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. , Parking , landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining , Excavation and 1Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in ( Section 4-2307 . 5 in addition to the above . 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTI ON: Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. 1-77 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ;'\• 1j/1 iiT, r /1' .__ -0 O y ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ;� G I FEB 19 l�?R till? FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ?i��/ P?`\�; �..� I)EP ` e1 pplication No. -r" F-- , % ; 1 nvironmental Checklist No. ROPQSED, date: FINAL , date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance . 1 . 0 Declaration of Non-Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance I COMMENTS: • Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971; Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS he prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. I please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages Af necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. • The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal. for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be: caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all Of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State Of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your. proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM . I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent VJD `. . vV,0 ,--(. . �PQ 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 115. PP-4,-/ Al £. a .1, UN/A • 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist 1"`177/ f 41, ro0 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. Nature and brief des.:ription of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : PAI2-14/i&V L.for A-Cr2trio,0 ri 12, X .s-r10, • -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : ® - 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : �.a -' 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : —3PA 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: I • 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth. conditions or in changer in *logic', )4 YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- overing of the soil? Y of-- °t LT5 YES MBE "0 (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ES MAYBE NNO (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? • • YES MAYBE N(— • (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the • bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? ' Explanation: YES MAYBE 'TO (2) Air. Will the; proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? NA YES MAYBE NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? YES— MAYBE N6 • (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • • • (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: • (a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of• • water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? • YES MAYBE • 0 (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff ? VIAL Ct?G�`l" y�'9'7`b 6 -2/ e O . YES MAYBE NO ah'il(c) A1t°�r�a ns t 11 ourse �r low o ki food wa -P 7e s ° YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? >4 YES MAYBE NO • (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YET— MBE N (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? • YES MAYBE NO • (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE 0 (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? �4 YES MAYBE K0 Explanation: (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change i,n the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs, grass , crops , microflor'a and aquaticplants)? .' L. �` / / �� GPI E5 MAYBE Fro (b) Reduction f t e nu bens o any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? Tn.— MITE NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MAYBE NO (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in : (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of . any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? )1(" YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or • endangered species of fauna? >Cf YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna int') an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? >d YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YT5 MAYBE b • • Explanation: (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in. the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE ND • Explanation: • (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an , explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) • to the event of an accident or. upset conditions? V MAYBE ti0 Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? . YES MAYBE ET— Explanation: -5- ( 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or �p create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: , • 13Transportation/Circulation. Wi( ) 11 the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? 51( YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? YES . MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YES MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase'\ in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? TES MAYBE NO • Explanation: • (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? 3 • YES MAYBE ;?Cl) (b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO • (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? _ YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE tO (f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • • (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities.: 4745 (a) Power or natural gas? ITT- MAYBE FO (b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO (c) Water? YES MAYBE NO G -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? _ YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm: water drainage? YES MAYBE NO (f) Solid waste and disposal ? - YES MAYBE TT- Explanation: (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES WRY W Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the publics or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? L. YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • • (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an Impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MA 4E Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an • • alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE Zk'-- • Explanation: • III: SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowled.", � a ab velipformation is true and complete. It is understood that the lead ag� cy ,y®v�� h, a�7 ny decla- ration of .non-significance that it might issue in reliajr' . pu, s r hey'&list /Should there be' any willful misrepresentation or willfu —laµk// f , u . f• -�sfci •—on..m part. • • Proponent: /' ` (S gne r/ % E gr r name printe• " • City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 David G. Woodcock, Jr. D. D.S . 115 Pelly N. Renton, Wa. 98055 ///45- ��� February 23, 1981 Land Use Hearing Examiner City of Renton 4 Renton, Wa. 98055 �QPi -ANN1A1G Dear Sir , The purpose of this letter is to justify a rezone of Lot 4, Block 24, Renton Farm Plat No. 3 C 123 Pelly North ) from its existing R-2 zoning to R-3 , and then to obtain a special permit in order to add a parking area to the dental clinics on 115-121 Pelly North. The R-2 zoning has not been changed since 1953. The parking requirements were minimal when the clinics were con- structed in 1960 . Since the construction of these clinics the methods of prac- ticing dentisty and numbers of people that can be treated by a prac- titioner have changed significantly. Dentists are much more effi- cient now than 20 years ago and many more patients come through the door in a given day. As a result of this, problems with substandard Parking in this area have been many. Some of the problems are as follows: 1 . Patient complaints during peak hours from not being able to find street parking and not being able to manuver in the small stalls between the building. 2. Damage to the building and other structures from autos parking and leaving. 3.. 8-10 auto parking accidents per year to staff, patient, and neighbors autos. 4. Poor entry and exit into existing stalls . S. Inadequate street parking during the work day. The existing house on 123 Pelly is in failing condition due to its age and not attractive from the street. The rental cash flow situation is poor and remodeling the house is contraindicated. This area is changing. One can see the emergence of new duplexes and four plexes as well as a relatively new dental clinic on 3rd end Pelly. The proposed changes will not only up date our present complex , but will be an attractive plus for neighbors in the area from the standpoint of esthetics and street safety. Page 2 The changes proposed would be in harmony with the designated High density multi-family use. It is apporpriate as it will harmoniously annex with the existing properties on Lots 2 and 3, and timely, considering the present condition of the existing house and the need for better parking. Thank you for considering this property for rezone. 1 Sincerely, ict David G. Woodcock ,,_40. D.D S . DGW/lfh • • � I AFFIDAVIT I, DS$'v b G, i.,60zy1t;G-c.kC ��- , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my 'knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me 1 tk this �4 day of , ,hVt(Yt+ E. , , 19gb , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at (14 . Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Ow er) fi(y . /1'1 17A— r ot� �f-{- )J . Its (Address) �� i (Address) l_JA (City) (State) Z20 —3�`i2 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This. is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of'—such application . c PF1J!I n ' Date ' Received � 'f O , 19 By : FEB 19 71/::) 7i . Renton Planning Dept . i�j 4 2-73 ENDING' . OF FILE FILE TITLE M ' / 1 31-2- 1 /65/