Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA81-024 BEGINNING • .0F FILE FILE TITLE .` ,/ • 41° • 11. / ./ p 40, 1 , ,! f 1 ti• I \ 1 1 / 1 i 1 1 1 11 WATER DISTIRICT NO. 90 1-4 1 BOUNDRY 1 21'; illz i • 1 0/1 1 • 1 • , r ; 4 1 L / 11J.L.,_ SE i2eT, .... .......... .__ST. _ ..... ..-.--— I •.-"------------j • Ilimmm......... 111 • .I . 11 ammrowftme 1 , ......• ••••••••••••••••vionoommim••OEM 1• 1 -4----ORIGINAL ORION'SE i29TO PL.] I I 1 . I •i• (•:;=•-::::---::::::. 1 DRAINAGE i BOUND • .• , li t, • i I 1'ill I l i 4 I 11 1 I W` i i t t 1 .4 ..1 ' * 1 .-J 1 --- - --.J SE. !:: - !).il SE 132NC ST i MWWwimfi ....., 1 --. ---..... -- ----......- --. ‘....' i •:11 SE :33ND ST1 i i 1 0:1 i , - : • i di , • ,., ,... ,,III‘if :34TH S_Ii trA -.di 11 / i'l 11 ,...,i ' i * *------ --- 1 ,..,1 re ! v 11 ..; Z I ----- „, . 0 , i 0 sf: 1531.1.4 ST r! 4. c. A5TH q,• 41: A-2-7---- - i 9 1 i 1 . : ---..1 ....1... i f ! ISE 136/11 ST L..... =.7.—.}. ....../.21 -__•:_—_. .....----1 1 6;. -.•-•)) 4' I '.. SE 1361)1 Pi I le tr) *d mommmmmilm410 ZI 1 ,..514;.! -1.5-'-''' -------Aok L I 1 1 la ti\ , MAPLEWOOD . , › .4," *L4-':--" ,,,, ----::-'" \T --el...., ...-- id ( ' ,) ELEMENTARY • Ill i ; i 4 • q A I rr 1Y\ SCHOOL 1.1:-_—=. ! • • •,;.:- •",----- • i z .— en--- -..... • ..„....„ Ile:N ....., . (`Ilis mow ems mem mow a — I 1 i r------.,. ( ----; -) --V ,....; I:::---.--' .::. .41 7/-1:`:•••••#•• ,...''. .-'‘ (L.7,L SE 139TN ST. •••/., A I sE 140114 s 1 SE ISSTH Pt., oil tit 0 ST a - „, . _ ., ION /I ti 1"I I A, A„ • ,T. . tsE AcTs i,,, ! , i ---i MAI ,..._::.....,;,.....--*-------- •••„ 0.4 41 Z • * 1.•• ist..-1•41411d;;7.'. .^,';', If - 142NO ST -di/. '' '. c;eyr•••••-'-'0.-* 4•1 e. , • ‘16‘ti‘,Zr 4,-. ,,,,,i 1 rtfattr.,,,*14:401t41.4,Lrel 142142 ..1-i 1 isij 1 1 V 1511 yi..izc...sr! 1 1 ,.‘ . . • x wi 1 1 1 (-_7' : :. ,_,:!---:-;-:--- -/".7. 1 1 - 144 : ...-. , e i ,i; ' 1 • : . >‘...., 'i 1 ti Oot.: '4 :. . i .1, . 1 lik04 ,3 ill ri,).' . • i a t."...z4r4t- ,,,, ,s. ,.-,,-..„...„ ..sc. .1441•14 .....;.'„ L..._.,...”.) Jri 117;7: ,. ti 1 1 a us-1•1111111111MIW Wrilnll.1161111111111110/111/111. IIIIMMiiimin-I; ftIII 6 1 111 ;411kfli ''11111111k St ..! • 10111-A I •z.. ...... • . ,/,--/. (••1:044. ' I "• ,.--------. : ...., ;/7 . . - •N:sli _.., \ . . '-*/ii-1;.-, ..-2' ,,,. — -.. . • .\ _,...---- , -v ) ',.....'•.. ' f' •-.. • . • .IIIItsii:aif k \14‘...-- . ) ; '`....:---, rfipo, . ,... )-Ar- 4%'.: il / : • • , , . ..... ) ; • cED, R i .....mk - -, , . - ! , . I i --__ i f • -__ --- 1 ! i ...._ RI en, 1/ • i/ • „. , , 22) -' Rum, •,,. 1 , • \.,.. „ - .. gra-NJ • -__ . ___._..... • . _.. _.. . - - • it Exhibit A . item 1 ....... _ ••-,::::::::_:.. ..___ " .................. ..... ...... . . •I. ALL PIPES 8" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE . • MAP KEY .". „.• .,- momsimso ammonium momonlie MED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AREA , BOUNDARY AND REVISED ORION ROAD DRAINAGE BOUNDARY 111111hk ! . N \ \ FLOOD HAZARD AREA (DESIGNATED PURSUANT TO - 0 500 1000 KCC 21.54) 11. .. !! ....0) IIIMMENMEMI...al..—Mu... RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting August 3 , 1981 Council Chambers Monday , 8 : 00 P .M . Municipal Building MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council President; RANDALL ROCKHILL, ROBERT COUNCIL HUGHES, EARL CLYMER, THOMAS W. TRIMM, CHARLES F. SHANE (arrived at 8:05 P.M.) JOHN REED. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; DEL IN ATTENDANCE MEAD, City Clerk; MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; DAVID CLEMENS, Acting Planning Director; LT. DON PERSSON, Police Department; FIRE MARSHALL James Matthews; M. MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk and Recorder. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle INUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF JULY 27, 1981 AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. SPECIAL Mayor Shinpoch presented for viewing, gifts to the City from PRESENTATION Renton's Sister City, Nishiwaki , Japan. The gifts consisted of two Japanese dolls hand made by special techniques and delivered by young visitor from Nishiwaki 's Mayor. Mayor Shinpoch explained she would be sending Indian art objects to Japan. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the business matters included: For-Hire Letter from O. K. Cab Co. President Leslie Funderburg requested License changes in the for-hire license of new cab drivers to dispense with the physical examination as done by Seattle and King County. The letter also requested reduction in fees, noting Seattle and King County are $16 per year. Refer to Public Safety Committee. One Valley Place Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman recommended approval with restrictive Rezone covenants for One Valley Place Properties Rezone R-046-81 , G to P-1 to allow office and commercial space; located southwest of the Talbot Rd. S and SW 43rd St. intersection. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA Approved AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President Stredicke made inquiry re notification of LID #313 citizens involved in July 20, 1981 letter/petition before Council Talbot Road S from Talbot Rd. S residents requesting review and revision of Street LID #313. Council President Stredicke requested petitioners Improvements be notified of City Attorney and Public Works Dept. findings. Mayor Shinpoch reported advice that LID #313_ not be reopened. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, ADMINISTRATION NOTIFY PEOPLE FILING PETITION,DATED 7/16/81, OF THE CITY ATTORNEY OPINION REGARD- ING LID #313 AND THE PURPOSE OF LID #313 AND ANY CHANGES WOULD HAVE TO BE MADE AT PUBLIC HEARING; THAT COUNCIL HAS NOT CHOSEN TO BE- HOLD PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Tiffany Park Council President Stredicke asked for update of plans for Tiffany Walkway Park Walkway improvement re costs, etc. , noting letters have been Improvement received from Boy Scout Troups attempting to establish Eagle Scout project. Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented committee Committee report which explained for informational purposes, their meeting Location of with Renton Housing Authority Executive Director, A. J. Ladner, and Family Housing Planning Department representatives for review of proposal to 'roposal construct 30 units of family housing for low income families. The report recalled first site choice of NE 16th and Kirkland NE was rejected by the Department of Housing and Urban Development Renton City Council 8(3/81 Page 2 Old Business Continued - Community Services Committee - Continued Family Housing by because of its close proximity to other publicly assisted units. Housing Authority The report explained the site selection is a two-acre area east of at NE 3rd Street Vantage Point Condominiums between NE 3rd St. and NE 4th St, with access off NE 4th St. and is the second choice of the Housing Authority. Following discussion, Acting Planning Director Clemens noted HUD has not given final approval of the site, that assisted housing does exist within the census tract. Council noted concern for adequate bus transportation. Parking Tickets Councilman Shane asked that parking tickets be cancelled that were issued in the downtown area on Saturday during Western Days due to streets being cleared. Mayor Shinpoch and Police Representative Persson noted no complaints have been received. Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee report recommended concurrence in the Committee adoption of the proposed policy statement for reimbursement of Chaff man: Clymer travel and per diem expenses for candidates competing for Recruitment of selected positions in the City. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, Department Heads - ADOPT THE REPORT AND REFER TO THE ADMINISTRATION AS POLICY STATE- Reimbursement MENT. CARRIED. Public Safety The Public Safety Committee report recommended the City enter Committee into an agreement with the City of Normandy Park for the housing Chairman: Hughes of their prisoners and the Council authorize the Mayor and City Normandy Park Clerk to sign the agreement. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND ROCKHILL, Prisoners CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Automatic Response The Public Safety Committee recommended the City and neighboring Mutual Aid cities and Fire Districts (such as Bellevue, Kent, Tukwila, King County #20, #25, #40) enter into mutual aid and automatic response agreements. The report stated rendering of assistance under this agreement would be of mutual benefit to all jurisdic- tions for emergency medical aid and fire supression situations and requested referral to the Ways and Means Committee for proper form. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee report noted review of appeal Development by Dominic Colasurdo of Hearing Examiner's decision for denial Committee ; of a Special Permit for filling and grading of a site located Chrm: Rockhill at the southeast quadrant of the intersection of NE 4th and Appeal Union Ave. SE. The Committee concluded that the Examiner was in Dominic Colasurdo error and the committee found that the drainage feature crossing Special Permit the subject property is not a "stream" requiring preservation SP-024-81 pursuant to Section 4-2313-4 of the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance. The Committee recommended the Examiner's decision regarding SP-024-81 be reversed and the permit be granted subject to compliance with the City's Mining, Excavating and Grading Ordinance. Councilman Stredicke inquired re defini- tion of stream and was advised by Councilman Rockhill that stream had permanent source of water; that committee felt this was drain- age situation subject to rain. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR WITH FINDINGS OF THE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee recommended the following ordinances Committee for second and final readings: (First readings 7/27/81) Chairman: Clymer An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification from GS-1 to R-1 ; property located on west side of Olympia Ave. NE Ordinance #3564 between NE 10th St. and NE 10th Place; known as the Kampe Construc- Kampe Construction tion Co. Rezone. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR IN THE Rezone R-046-81 RECOMMENDATION AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 6-AYE: ROCKHILL, HUGHES, CLYMER, TRIMM, SHANE, REED; ONE NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED. Ordinance #3565 An ordinance was read for appropriation of $82,000 and transfer Appropriation and of $117,522 unto Parker property/Cedar River Trail for acquisition Transfer of property; total purchase price $225,000. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND Parker Property ROCKHILL, CONCUR AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Attorney noted donation of 53 acres rather than 25. f&ALL enton City Council (3(81 Page 2 Ild Business Continued - Community Services Committee - Continued amily Housing by because of its close proximity to other publicly assisted units. ousing Authority The report explained the site selection is a two-acre area east of :t NE 3rd Street Vantage Point Condominiums between NE 3rd St. and NE 4th St, with access off NE 4th St. and is the second choice of the Housing Authority. Following discussion, Acting Planning Director Clemens noted HUD has not given final approval of the site, that assisted • housing does exist within the census tract. Council noted concern for adequate bus transportation. 'arking Tickets Councilman Shane asked that parking tickets be cancelled that were issued in the downtown area on Saturday during Western Days due to streets being cleared. Mayor Shinpoch and Police Representative Persson noted no complaints have been received. Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee report recommended concurrence in the ommittee adoption of the proposed policy statement for reimbursement of ' `jai man: Clymer travel and per diem expenses for candidates competing for ecruitment of selected positions in the City. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, epartment Heads - ADOPT THE REPORT AND REFER TO THE ADMINISTRATION AS POLICY STATE- Reimbursement MENT. CARRIED. public Safety The Public Safety Committee report recommended the City enter Committee into an agreement with the City of Normandy Park for the housing hairman: Hughes of their prisoners and the Council authorize the Mayor and City ormandy Park Clerk to sign the agreement. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND ROCKHILL, risoners CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Automatic Response The Public Safety Committee recommended the City and neighboring Mutual Aid cities and Fire Districts (such as Bellevue, Kent, Tukwila, King County #20, #25, #40) enter into mutual aid and automatic response agreements. The report stated rendering of assistance under this agreement would be of mutual benefit to all jurisdic- tions for emergency medical aid and fire supression situations and requested referral to the Ways and Means Committee for proper form. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. lanning and Planning and Development Committee report noted review of appeal 'evelopment by Dominic Colasurdo of Hearing, Examiner's decision for denial ommittee of a Special Permit for filling and grading of a site located hrm: Rockhill at the southeast quadrant of the intersection of NE 4th and Appe31 Union Ave. SE. The Committee concluded that the Examiner was in Dominic Colasurdo error and the committee found that the drainage feature crossing Special Permit the subject property is not a "stream" requiring preservation SP-024-81 pursuant to Section 4-2313-4 of the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance. The Committee recommended the Examiner's \, decision regarding SP-024-81 be reversed and the permit be granted subject to compliance with the City's Mining, Excavating and Grading Ordinance. Councilman Stredicke inquired re defini- tion of stream and was advised by Councilman Rockhill that stream had permanent source of water; that committee felt this was drain- age situation subject to rain. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR WITH FINDINGS OF THE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ?RDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee recommended the following ordinances _Committee for second and final readings: (First readings 7/27/81) hairman: Clymer An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification from GS-1 to R-1 ; property located on west side of Olympia Ave. NE rdinance #3564 between NE 10th St. and NE 10th Place; known as the Kampe Construc- mpe Construction tion Co. Rezone. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR IN THE ezone R-046-81 RECOMMENDATION AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 6-AYE: ROCKHILL, HUGHES, CLYMER, TRIMM, SHANE, REED; ONE NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED. rdinance #3565 An ordinance was read for appropriation of $82,000 and transfer ppropriation and of $117,522 unto Parker property/Cedar River Trail for acquisition ransfer of property; total purchase price $225,000. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECON arker Property ROCKHILL, CONCUR AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Attorney noted donation of 53 acres rather than 25. OF RA t$ z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n " BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 09,o g• CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 'ED SEPS°P� August 17, 1981 Dominic J. Colasurdo 15440 SE May Valley Road Renton, WA 98056 Re: Appeal of Special Permit 024-81 Dear Mr. Colasurdo: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of August 3, 1981 considered your appeal of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of June 22, 1981 . The City Council concurred in the findings of ,the Planning and Development Committee reversing the Examiner's decision and granting permit subject to compliance with the City's Mining, Excavating and Grading Ordinance. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact this office or the Planning Department 235-2550. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor Deputy City Clerk cc: Michael Hanis 3204 Auburn Way N. Auburn, WA 98002 cc; Hearing Examiner 1. DRAFT Planning and Development Committee Report RE : Appeal of Hearing Examiner Decision : SP-024-81 Colasurdo The Planning and Development Committee has reviewed the above reference appeal of Dominic Colasurdo , of a decision of the Hearing Examiner ' s denial of a Special Permit for Filling and Grading of a site located at the southeast quadrant of the intersection of NE 4th and Union Avenue SE . The Committee has concluded that the Examiner erred in the finding that the drainage feature crossing the subject property is a "stream" requiring preservation pursuant .to Section 4-2 13-4 of the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance . /1U6. 4Therefore , the Committee recommends th. ' the Examiner ' s decision regarding SP-024-81 be rever- =nd the permit be granted, subject to the compliance ith applicable provisions of the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance . F RAN S�'day Affidavit of Publication jut. to 1981 STATE OF WASHINGTON _ - COUNTY OF KING ss. Jk/ • qN' G % Michele Roe being first duly sworn on ✓— oath,deposes and says that she is the Chief Cl erk of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a Public Notice week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, NOTICE OF printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper PUBLIC HEARING published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is RENTON LAND USE now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the HEARING EXAMINER aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record RENTON, WASHINGTON Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior A PUBLIC HEARING Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, WILL BE HELD BY THE' RENTON LAND USE Washington.That the annexed is a..A..NQ.tioe of Hearing HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMB- R6,56.5 ERS, CITY HALL, RE- NTON, WASHINGTON,ON JUNE 16, 1981, AT 9:00 as it was published in regular issues(and A.M. TO CONSIDER THE not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. DOMINIC J. COL- ASURDO Application for special per- of consecutive issues,commencing on the mit for fill and grade in B-1 - zone, File No. SP-024-81; day of June 19 81 ,and ending the property located on the south side of N.E.4th Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Avenue N.E. day of ,19 both dates 2. J. ANTHONY IVE inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub Application for site approval for construction of orthod- ontic during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee onticclinicinP-1zoneforDr. Brain and Dr. Dunnington, charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $. .6 which File No. SA-052-81;proper- has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred wor for the ty located west of Talbot first insertion and per folio of one hundred wards for each subsequent Road South approximately insertion. one-fourth mile.south of South 37th Street and im- mediately north of Valley General Hospital. Legal descriptions of the Chief Clerk files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning De- partment. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 11 day of ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS TO SAID PETITIONS pp ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- June , 19..el. . SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 16, 1981, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPIN- Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, IONS. residing at Kgarrit i County. DAVID CLEMENS AUDiL% ACTING PANNING DIRECTOR Published in the Daily Re- -Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill281,effective June cord Chronicle on June 1, 9th, 1955. 1981. R6565 —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. V.P.C.Form No.87 Rev.7-79 OF o; YI W..';, 0 THE CITY OF RENTON / Q� x MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 Lies&cramI o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT °p� 235— 2550 0 947-F0 SEPi°# MEMO. A RUM DATE: JULY 29, 1981 TO: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: APPEAL OF REMAND DECISION BY HEARING EXAMINER COMINIC COLASURDO/FILE NO. SP-024-81 FACTS : 1 . The applicant ' s appeal of the remand decision by the Hearing Examiner is based on four points : a. "No other definition is given in support of the Hearing Examiner ' s decision. " b. " . . that the feature" (meaning ditch or intermittent stream bed)"conveys the run-off from approximately 400 acres is erroneous . " c. "An examination of the authorities relied on by the Examiner in his decision make it clear that this is not a ' stream' or 'water course ' . " d. The applicant has met its burden of showing that there will be no harm to the public welfare. 2. These statements are not supported by facts from the Hearing Examiner 's report . a. The Hearing Examiner specifically gives a definition from page 1590 of Black' s Law Dictionary. The reference by the appellant to "all definitions" is 'erroneous in itself . b. In 1962 the U. S..G'.'5.. conducted an aerial survey of the City and a topographic map was subsequently developed. This map used as the base for an early land use study clear shows the "feature" as an intermittent stream, which provides drainage to J more than the estimated 400 -acres in Section 10 and 15 of T.23 North, R. 5 W.M. The drainage basin extends from approximately 1, 200 to 1 , 500 feet north of the subject site south to the Cedar River. This is the same drainage basin as the Cascadia Annexation is located. in. c. The appellant ' s statement is incorrect . As defined by Black, a "stream" is always a "water course" , but a "water course" is not always a "stream" . A "water course" could be of intermittent character . d. The question of public welfare is generally established based on the communities ' goals and policies . These clearly support the protection of natural drainage features. The question of whether it is intermittent or continuous is irrelevant ; it is a natural water course. In addition, the applicant did not submit any plans showing the use of the site. Therefore, he has not proven that the public welfare will be harmed ifathe "water course" remains . RECOMMENDATION: The appellant has not proven that the Hearing Examiner has made an error in fact or law. The Examiner has made a decision based upon accepted legal definitions that can always be refuted with other legal definitions . THE EXAMINER'S DECISION SHOULD BE AFFIRMED. RENTON CITY COUNCIL July 13, 1981 Regular Meeting Municipal Building Monday, 8:00 P.M. Council Chambers M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RICHARD STREDICKE, Council President; JOHN REED; CHARLES SHANE; COUNCIL THOMAS TRIMM; EAFL CLYMER; ROBERT HUGHES; and RANDALL ROCKHILL. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; IN ATTENDANCE MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; MAXINE MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk; VINCE LEE, Public Works Coordinator; DAVID CLEMENS, Acting Planning Director; EDWARD HAYDUK, Housing and Community Development Coordinator; LT. DON PERSSON, Police Department; and GLADYS HARDING, Recorder. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE MINUTES OF 7/06/81 JULY 6, 1981 . CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, Tiffany Park published and mailed as required by law, Mayor Shinpoch opened Walkway the public hearing to consider the Tiffany Park Public Walkway. Vacation The walkway is 10 feet wide public right-of-way in Block 2 of the Tiffany Park Div. 2 extending from Index Avenue S.E. to Lake Youngs Way S.E. and lying north of S.E. 17th Court and south of Kirkland Court. Councilman Reed did not participate in discussion or action, declared a possible conflict of interest and left the Council Chambers. Correspondence was read from Richard Houghton, Chairman of Board of Public Works , recommending the walkway be vacated at no charge and to retain utility easements on the property. Correspondence was read from Dick Weller, 2609 Lake Youngs Court S.E. , a concerned property owner in the area, asked for reconside- ration on final closure of walkway. Persons present: Dorwin Cook, 1608 Pierce S .E. , a concerned parent of children which use the walkway as a short cut to school , presented a survey taken from nearby residents of the area resulting in the support to improve the walkway. Cindy Hutchinson, 1621 Index S.E. , representing three others in attendance, favored keeping path open and re- quested research on area before closing, volunteering assistance in payment for improvements. Morris Biddulph, 1662 Monroe Court, favored keeping the path open. Charles Morgan, 1620 Pierce S.E. , was concerned about safety of children using other means than walkway. Leslie Crump, 1629 Index Avenue S.E. , expressed adults useage of the walkway. Roger Sathers, 1672 Lake Youngs Way S.E. , adjacent property owner, requested improvement of the walkway as it is unsafe in present condition. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND ROCKHILL, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. CARRIED. After further discussion, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND ROCKHILL, THE ADMINISTRATION PURSUE AND RECOMMEND IMPROVEMENTS TO WALKWAY TO CONSIuLR THE SAFETY AND MAINTENANCE WITH THE USE OF A CIVIC ORGANIZATION TO ASSIST. CARRIED. Dorwin Cook suggested the City establish a fund to receive contributions for the walkway which would qualify as "tax exempt." Councilman Reed returned to Council Chambers. AUDIENCE COMMENT Highlands Peggy Cummins , 330 Vuemont Place N.E. , questioned the use of Park n Ride recently vacated public right-of-way to Highlands Community Lot Church. Versie Vaupel , 400 Cedar Avenue South, expressed concerns Committee of the re the location of the Park n Ride Lot and length of time of lease Whole Report agreement with Metro. IT WAS MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, TO ADVANCE TO COMMITTEE OF WHOLE REPORT DEALING WITH SUBJECT PARK N RIDE LOT. CARRIED. The Committee of the Whole recommended Council concurrence in presentation of Washington State Department of Transportation recommendation for Site No. 1 located at N.E. 10th and Kirkland Ave. N.E. adjacent to the Highlands Community Church as a Park n Ride Lot. IT WAS MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, THAT COUNCIL CONCUR WITH COMMITTEE REPORT. K. Johnson, 912 Kirkland Avenue N.E. , inquired re address of Park n Ride lot. Councilman Stredicke responded and also explained the A.M./P.M. schedule to Renton City Council 7/13/81 Page 2 AUDIENCE COMMENT (continued) reduce traffic congestion in the residential area. ROLL CALL: 5-AYES: STREDICKE, SHANE, CLYMER, HUGHES, ROCKHILL. 2-NOS: REED, TRIMM. CARRIED. Tiffany Park Dorwin Cook inquired re the possibility of barrier between Royal Walkway Hills low income housing and private property to deter children from ruining lawns , fences, etc. , or a busing solution for trans- portation to school . Mrs. Gary Seivers , 1651 Monroe Court S.E. , expressed concerns of vandalism and uprising burglary, requesting fencing or barrier be installed, noting 50-60 school children walk over their property to get to Tiffany Park Walkway. A. J . Ladner, Director of Renton Housing Authority, will research problem of barrier and government responsibility. Public Works Mr. Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South, expressed concern re the Director proposed ordinance for change of qualifications in position of Qualifications Public Works Director. Upon request of K. Johnson, Renton Chamber of Commerce, IT WAS MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, THAT SUBJECT OF LOCATION OF 30-UNIT HOUSING, OF THE CONSENT AGENDA BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE COUNCIL. CARRIED. HUD 30-Unit Letter was read regarding the N.E. 3rd/4th proposed site location Housing for the 30-unit housing requested by the Renton Housing Authority. Project IT WAS MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, TO REFER THE ENTIRE MATTER TO COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Dominic Appeal has been filed of Hearing Examiner 's recommendation of Colasurdo April 6, 1981 , regarding Dominic Colasurdo Special Permit, SP-024-81 . Appeal , Refer to Planning and Development Committee. SP-024-81 IT WAS MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, TO ACCEPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Aviation Committee Report presented by Chairman Stredicke as follows: Aviation The FAA Tower Lease has been renegotiated with a lease payment of Committee $456.44 for a ten-year period, with option to adjust the payment Report after five years, if documented costs are presented. IT WAS FAA Tower MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, THAT MAYOR AND CITY CLERK BE Lease AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE LEASE AGREEMENT WITH FAA TOWER. CARRIED. Boeing Company The Airport requested to lease land adjacent to Boeing Fire Pit Agreement to Boeing for two years for $1 .00 per year. The parcel is 17,390.23 sq. ft. and located between the East Perimeter Road and the Cedar River waterway. The land is unuseable for aviation due to proximity of fire pit. The City will retain right to store gravel that will be dredged from the Cedar River. IT WAS MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND ROCKHILL, TO APPROVE THE BOEING COMPANY AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT. CARRIED. East Side East Side Cedar River Tie-Down contains 18,166.50 square feet and Cedar River is adjacent to Airport Specialties leased area and located between Tie-Down East Perimeter Road and Cedar River. This parcel was offered to Airport Specialties for use as tie-down area. The prime lease is ready for signing, adding this as a supplement. IT WAS MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, TO APPROVE EAST SIDE CEDAR RIVER TIE-DOWN SUPPLEMENT AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT. CARRIED. Airport Tractor Due to conflicting mowing schedules between the Street Department Mower and Airport for use of Street Dept. mower and down time for repairs, the Committee requested authorization to purchase mower in the amount of $7,525.56. Fund transfer was requested. An equipment rental fee would be established for use by other departments. IT WAS MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND ROCKHILL, TO AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF JOHN DEERE TRACTOR-MOWER FOR $7,525.56 AND REFER THE MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR RESOLUTION. CARRIED. - For.Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # ` � AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING July 13, 1981 Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. City Clerk's Office For Agenda Of (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Del Mead, City Clerk (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Consent X decision; re: Dominic Colasurdo Public Hearing Correspondence SP-024-81, Special Permit . Ordinance/Resolution Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session � Appeal • Other B. Hearing Examiner's decision 6/16/81 - C. City Council letter Approval: Legal Dept. Yes_ No N/A X COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Finance Dept. Yes_ No. N/A X Refer to Planning and Development Other Clearance CommLttee FISCAL IMPACT: Expen iture Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) Appeal filed by Michael M. Hanis, Attorney for Dominic Colasurdo, Special Permit SP-0�24-81 PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. LAW OFFICES OF Offices: AUBURN RENTON ARPOLD, HANIS & FIOI � � GEORGE FIORI,JR. Reply to: 3204 AUBURN WAY NORTH DAVID L.HARPOLD �q AUBURN,WASHINGTON 98002 MICHAEL M.HANIS c� ��NOJ � TELEPHONE(206)833-5001 838-0510 JOHN R.RIZZARDIttn - �® KENNETH W.FORNABAI cffakv`s _nga� 4et 031 July--7-, 1981 Renton City Council Office of the Land Use Hearing Examiner City of Renton • Re: Dominic Colasurdo File No. SP-024-81 Dear Members of the Council: Dominic Colasurdo hereby appeals the decision of the Land Use Hearing Examiner in the above referenced matter. ' This appeal is based upon the following errors of law, fact and judgment: 1. The. Examiner has .erroneously concluded that the surface water in question is a stream or water course. It is neither. All definitions exclude this type of flow. No other definition is given in support of the Hearing Examiner' s decision. • 2 . It is submitted that the contention that the feature conveys the run-off from approximately 400 acres is erroneous. 3. The Examiner concludes that rain is a permanent source of supply which qualifies this as a "stream" . In fact, all authorities distinguish streams from surface waters (which are not protected) on the- basis -that the source of surfac.t. waters is periodic rain. An examination of the authorities relied on by the Examiner in his decision make it clear that this is not a "stream" or "water course" . 4 . The applicant has met its burden of showing that there will be no harm to the, .public welfare by granting the permit. Very truly yours, ' HARPOLD, HANIS & , NI Michael M. Hanis • Attorney for Applicant MMH: ad CITY OF RENTON No. 18922 FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 1 - 19 ,.E I RECEIVED OF \A ) 1L"-kCL4: 4 CL ,'1 C oahuAtLo TOTAL j.5Cr GWEN E. MARSHALL, FINANCE DIRECTOR BY aLk) i HARPOLD, HANIS & FIORI Attorneys at Law 3204 AUBURN WAY NORTH AUBURN,WASHINGTON 98002 • Renton City Council.' Office of the Land. Use Hearing Examiner City of Renton MULTIVEST Lilo A 17422 108th AVENUE S.E. • SUITE 200 • RENTON, WA 98055 TELEPHONE: (206) 255-60 t May 11, 1981 . lb ii is ��-i, 1.e. — City of Renton Mayor and City Council ;Fmiii �� .`;.) Municipal Building � . .. ti V� 200 Mill Avenue Southc.rn ,'' 4,� Renton, WA 98055 `,,-- � ) 5 RE: Appeal Hearing Examiner Decision; :s V 44 Special Permit #SP-024-81 V cC i t.t:; Dear Mayor and City Council: We are owners of approximately 8 acres near the northeast quadrant of the inter- section of NE 4th Street and Union Avenue NE. It has come to our attention that the Renton Hearing Examiner has required the preservation of a small drainage ditch which crosses a portion of our property, as a condition of granting a request to fill certain property along the ditch near the southeast quadrant of the intersection (Mr. Colusurdo). We wish to express concerns and opposition to such a condition and our support of Mr. Colusurdo's appeal. We are not opposed to the preservation of significant streams and natural areas within the city. However, it appears that the preservation of this particular insignificant man-made ditch which is dry most of the year would not be in the best interests of the public, and is contrary to other city actions along this particular ditch and along other more significant water bodies. Preserving such a small unattractive ditch would create a nuisance and safety problem, as well a hindrance to site development. It appears that the most logical and reasonable alternative in this particular instance is to allow the proper incorporation of the ditch into the storm drainage systems required by city ordinance for Mr. Colusurdo's property and future development along its course. Sincerely, Multivest Ltd. JC R N� .r ` Rrr•, L� °2 — L i Jaime da Silva MAY 1 1981 Vice President i- J k,� JdS:cc �q41... ,, !'� NG DE? -.ate, A Complete Real Estate Development— I.CI. Division ----;--)1 D. ."1 U 40 ''�:�. ° THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL Z mil "+; o MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 . 235-2586 0 OMR 4 r "y . 0,9It.6-0 SEP1E�O May 8, 1981 APPEAL FILED BY DOMINIC COLASURDO RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner' s Decision Dated 4/6/81 , Special Permit SP-024-81 , Fill and Grade Existing Drainage Ditch and Install Storm Drains To Parties of Record: The Renton City Council ' s Planning and Development Committee will review the subject appeal at its meeting of Thursday, May 14, 1981 at 4:30 p.m. in the sixth floor conference room of the Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. Attached for your information is the section of the City Code dealing with the appeal process. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2586. Thank you. (3-40-4:2--1 -t^4144g) Billie J. Dunphy, Secretary Renton City Council7 '_ Attachment jv RE �lY � Its � _, �?" `9�NG DEQQ%¢� AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) ZZ ,, . G� Gir� , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the,- day of , 19Y/ , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Ar(--- G23,t//- 1(P Subscribed and sworn this 2_ day of 5 one) , 19 cgl . Notary Public in and for the State of ' Washington, residing at 9.[A-0n Application, Petition or Case: eg&P ,Gd (The m nuie,5 contain a ti4t a4 the pcvt is (J necand. ) i,7 r fy \ 0 t�\� 1 \, June 22, 1981 I>- (\,. ;)\-� ., is OFFICE OF THE LAND USE I ARIN,G EXAN;I�NER�= CITY OF RENTQ.N :°`'r ~ ��f„ REPORT AND DECISION . �'`'r"�,A N1 i -- APPLICANT: Dominic Colasurdo FILE NO. SP-024-81 LOCATION: South side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant originally sought approval of a special permit to fill and grade an existing drainage ditch and install storm drains on the subject site. A public hearing was held on March 31 , 1981 , and the Examiner's Decision of denial was published on April 6, 1981 . The matter was subsequently appealed to the City Council , and following consideration, it was remanded to the Examiner for further review. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Affirmation of denial . Hearing Examiner Decision: Affirmation of Denial . PLANNING DEPARTMENT A letter reviewing the nature of the drainage in this SUPPLEMENT: vicinity and its effect on the subject permit application was received by the Examiner on June 10, 1981 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department letter, examining available information on file with the original application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on June 16, 1981 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed background of the matter and the City Council 's intent in remanding it to the Examiner for further review following his original denial . Mr. Blaylock entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File, SP-024-81 , including documentation of all action taken on the matter, and Planning Department letter of recommendation, dated June 10, 1981 Exhibit #2: Previous Special Permit Application File, SP-032-80 (by reference) The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Michael Hanis 3204 Auburn Way N. Auburn, WA 98002 Mr. Hanis referenced the letter to the Hearing Examiner from the Planning Department, dated June 10, 1981 , and corrected reference to Section 4-2313-4, noting that the concern of the City Council pertained to Section 4-2316 of the Mining, Excavating and Grading Ordinance which refers to making every effort to preserve natural water courses, and the matter had been remanded back to the Examiner to make a specific determination. n_r_____ -•__ . . _- n _r .L_ ,____-_ u_ u__•_ .-J7--.....J A.L-‘ .... J.. _ _ _ - SP-024-81 Page Two a ditch as a natural water body. ;- Mr. Hanis referenced McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, Section 53. 132, which defines a watercourse as distinguished from surface waters, as a stream of water flowing through a well-defined bed or channel with sides or banks and a permanent source of supply. He advised that the City Attorney had also acknowledged this reference as a definitive authority on municipal law. Mr. Hanis advised that other policy elements can be met through placement of occasional water flow in pipes to allow development of the property for B-1 , business purposes, and he assured that permeability and on-site retention requirements will be complied with. The Examiner inquired if there is any reason why the stream could not be protected and the property also developed concurrently for business purposes. Mr. Hanis agreed that the possibility exists, but a large bank of dirt is pushed up to it, and water is contained in pipes both north and south of the subject site. The Examiner observed that the city is not required to perpetuate previous action, and the map submitted by the Planning Department indicates that the water course serves approximately 400 acres. Mr. Hanis stated that it is difficult to believe that the ditch serves that acreage because of its insigificance in size and visibility on the site. The Examiner stated that natural absorption of the stream bank and bed is lost as water flows into a pipe. Mr. Hanis felt that the loss would be insignificant and could be mitigated with other engineering features utilized on the property. He concluded by stating that it is not the appellant's position solely that he should be allowed to do what other property owners have been allowed, but also that he can comply with the requirements of the city through installation of pipe on the site. The Examiner requested testimony in support of the matter. There was no response. He then requested comments in opposition. Responding was: • Ray Griffin 14306 144th S.E. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Griffin, resident in the area of the site, indicated the concern of.the community over the long term effect of eliminating a natural drainage way which serves as storm water retention in the area. He noted that siltation from fill projects is already apparent from S.E. 128th Street, and such siltation kills vegetation and fish downstream. He also stated that water which is piped cannot be monitored for flow or content. Mr. Griffin advised that King County has identified the stream as a Class I fish and wildlife habitat, and he referenced King County Ordinance No. 1840, Policy WH 12.D, which discusses protection of wildlife habitat and open space. As a resident of the Maplewood Heights community, Mr. Griffin advised that residents have dedicated greenbelts and perpetuate an ongoing fish enhancement and stream program in the area. He emphasized the need for the city to protect waterways within the city limits, particularly when residents are actively involved in protecting greenbelts and fish habitat. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding the exact location of Mr. Griffin's residence, Mr. Blaylock designated the location on a topographic map submitted by the speaker. The map was entered into the record by the Examiner as follows: Exhibit #3: Topographic Map of Plat Layout submitted by Mr. Griffin The Examiner requested further comments. Responding was: Mary Ryan 645 Shattuck Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 Ms. Ryan, representing the owner of a five-acre parcel to the east of the subject site, indicated her client's support of the proposal to fill the ditch since he plans a similar fill project in the near future. She noted that if the ditch were covered, an existing Emmiikkilii}-f^^* - - ► u>d be eliminated. SP-GLY-81 Page Three site plans have not been submitted to prove that the fill project would cause insignificant impact. The Examiner requested final comments. Since there were none, the hearing regarding the matter was closed by the Examiner at 9:32 a.m. REMAND DECISION: The matter was brought before the Examiner as a result of an appeal to the City Council and of a remand by that body to hear further testimony and collect further evidence as to the natJre of a water course traversing the subject site in a generally north to south direction. The topographical feature has variously been referred to in testimony and reports as a drainage ditch, water course, waterbody, drainage feature and stream, and each of these terms has been variously modified by the term, intermittent or periodic. Topographic and land use maps demonstrate that, at least for the last 20 years, the topographic feature in question does, in fact, convey water through the site. Further, the feature in question conveys water to a ravine and dedicated greenbelt area north of the Cedar River in the Maplewood Heights Subdivision and thence to the Cedar River. Exhibits #3 and 4 indicate by use of a standard symbol , that the feature in question conveys water intermittently. The symbol is denoted by a dashed and dotted. line. Such symbols on topographic maps indicated periodic or intermittent flow. The feature also serves as a channel to convey the runoff from an approximately 400 acre drainage basin. The water course feeds the water flow further down the channel to an area adjacent to Maplewood Heights. The creek flowing in the vicinity of Maplewood Heights is undergoing stream enhancement. Whether water flows perennially or intermittently, it serves to perio9dically recharge the areas at lower elevations. Culverting the feature will cause the atural recharge of both surface and subsurface water to be altered. Water would be more rapidly conveyed over the subject site with concommitant erosion of the banks of the stream further downstream. Also natural percolation on the subject site into the channel would be altered by culverting and could change the storage potential of the subsurface recharge area. The Mining, Excavating and Grading Ordinance provides that "every effort shall be made to preserve perennial and intermittent streams and their surrounding vegetation" (Emphasis supplied) . The applicant 's reliance on the definition contained in McQuillin is unfounded. A water course is defined as follows: "to constitute a water course as distinguished from surface waters, it is necessary that there be a stream of water flowing through a well-defined bed or channel with sides or banks and a permanent source of supply" (McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, Section 53. 132) , and said definition does not eliminate the subject stream from the definition of a water course. The stream course is visible on on-site inspection as a distinct low area running north to south across the subject site and the same is visible from observation of aerial photographs of the subject site. The feature is also indicated on topographic maps of the site. Further review of topographic maps indicates that the intermittent stream runs southward and enters a more defined gully or canyon. A permanent source of supply is distinct from a continous source of supply. The winter rains serve as a generally permanent, albeit intermittent source of water. A "stream" is defined in Black's Law Dictionary as: "A water course having a source and terminus, banks, and channel , through which waters flow at least periodically, and it usually empties into other streams, lakes or the ocean, but it does not lose its character as a water course even though it may break up and disappear." (Black's Law Dictionary, page 1590) And a "water course" is defined as: "A running stream of water; a natural stream fed SP-024-81 Page Four The Washington Supreme Court stated that surface waters "may be said to form a 'water course' at a point where they begin to form a reasonably well-defined channel , with bed, banks, or sides and current, although the stream itself may be very small and the waters may not flow continuously." Alexander v Muenscher, 7 Wn.2d 557, at 559 (1941) . (Emphasis supplied) The applicant had the burden of demonstrating that the grade and fill requested would not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. The applicant has not demonstrated that culverting the water course on the subject site will not adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare. The recent addition to the Comprehensive Plan indicates that natural drainage ways should be retained and even enhanced. Past action concerning culverting should not foreclose future or current action. Natural .drainage patterns should not be altered without strong justification. The water course at least intermittently conveys water to a more permanent creek downstream. It was not demonstrated that the current channel does not, in fact, continuously convey water below its visible surface to that downstream creek. That creek flows into the Cedar River. That portion of the creek below the subject site and above the Cedar River is part of a stream and salmon enhancement program. Under the circumstances, the water course on the subject site should not be culverted, nor the natural vegetation along its banks. altered. Culverting the stream on the subject site may only tend to exacerbate problems of downstream enhancement. Past land use practices which permitted unwise culverting of natural water features. do not have to be perpetuated without a showing that reasonable use of the property is otherwise impractical . In summary, the record now demonstrates that the feature in question feeds a larger flow and is actually, as indicated by the topographic map, part of the upper reaches of one continuous channel . While the flow of the feature on the subject property may not be evident on the surface during the dry months, it serves to recharge the lower reaches of the stream and directs water to the lower reaches of the stream. That stream is part of the dedicated greenbelt of the Maplewood Heights Subdivision. That same stream flows through the greenbelt, is recharged by the channel on the subject site, is part of a stream enhancement program, and serves as a feeder creek of the Cedar River. No evidence was presented that the channel could not be incorporated into a well planned development and serve as an asset to the development and the community. While the issue should be decided on the sole merits of whether or not the culverting of the stream is in the public interest, and that question has already been answered above in the negative, there remains the issue of rights accruing to others along that water course. The applicant has _failed to submit drainage releases as provided for in Section 4-2318(4) , signed by downstream property owners or other governmental agencies. Culverting of the stream will change percolation patterns, rates and volumes, and will also alter the velocity and silt content of the stream and affect sedimentation rates. DECISION: The original decision to deny the grade and fill permit stands. ORDERED THIS 22nd day of June, 1981 . Fred J. man Land Use earing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of June, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Michael Hanis, 3204 Auburn Way N. , Auburn, WA 98002 Ray Griffin, 14306 144th S.E. , Renton, WA 98055 Mary Ryan. 645 Shattuck Avenue S. , Renton, WA 98055 SP-024-81 Page Five Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City' s Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before July 6, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. ;I 1 II I 1 I :1 '1 /7 7 C e,//-4. A ,4134- 11 /721:4_____________1/- 0;,i7_,--9 1...._ la �c7/e1430/ 1 >.010S ' J3, I.5 . . i I '/ /v C'O 40 S>2 i.,/) e r9 &U.0J7/�✓C'rJu c° S'c II %e25 Z s>>U G, Gi syE l9c20 •vi S'...•1.PFx9eL I ,1 w1q-E/es , > 7- i s ,L)E C s S'.q/e y >dY7-- 1 '' '7,E`!& j)E i s✓,`.E,..V."-i, 0 c.i.i.17-E'.4 I ifG o e.V,'AJG, '7-1-'2 c3e,f toy GI/ELL - 2) L /k;',v E is ^ S /C)/a �. I .1 1 t I I I I1' ,1 ,1 'i , !I f 1 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER 1 JUN161981 AM PM 71c819;10111 111213,4.5o6 1 i I i - ITEM M INTO. V a,2 r% (A-f� ' iJ -) Ili /�-�/l�i(� I :f 1 4. OF I �� 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT "A co. 235- 2550 oq ��P June 10, 1981 gTEO SEPcE� MEMORANDUM I TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: David R. Clemens, Acting Planning Director RE: REMANDED PUBLIC HEARING; SP-024-81 COLASURDO The above referenced special permit was remanded to the Hearing Examiner by the City Council following consideration of an appeal of the Examiner' s denial. The Council specifically requested further consideration of Section 4-2313-4 which states "Every effort shall be made to preserve perennial and intermittent streams and their surrounding vegetation. " The Council desired further consideration of the nature of the drainage in this vicinity, and its effect on this permit application. 1 ) The subject site crosses a drainage feature that serves a drainage basin to the north containing approximately four hundred (400) acres. 2) The drainage feature crossing this site is a natural drainage feature which has been illustrated on City of Renton topographic maps since at least 1960 (see attached) . No earlier maps are available to illustrate the condition of the drainage at this site. 3) The Public Works Department confirms that the stream course at this location approximates the natural drainage-way of this basin. 4) The Public Works Department confirms that the subject drainage flows are intermittent in nature, flowing only during the rainy season and immediately following. 5) The Public Works Department confirms that it is feasible from an engineering standpoint to either underground or retain the current above ground drainage. 6) The Planning Department has considered possible uses of the property which incorporates the drainage feature, and concludes that a well designed and landscaped drainage feature would be an asset to future development of the property. Hearing Examiner RE: Remand Public Hearing SP-024-81 June 10, 1981 page 2 7) The Planning Commission in its deliberations on the Northeast Quadrant Comprehensive Plan shows in two of the three alter- natives for this immediate area, the preservation of this stream as a Greenbelt (see attached) . 8) The Comprehensive Plan POLICY ELEMENT 1 .C. 2 recommends preservation of natural waterbodies for open space. Further, 1 . C.4 recommends open space elements to separate major land use elements. This drainage feature approximates the separation between the Commercial and Multiple Family uses shown on the Comprehensive Plan. 1 .G. 1 recommends that the storm drainage systems incorporate natural drainage features. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the testimony at the previous public hearing, the appeal text provided by the applicant , and the analysis contained above, the Planning Department recommends that the Examiner affirm its prior denial - of this special permit application. DRC :dc "'TTT I •X 409 ti.TREES P....., TREES „ • f 6z 4 L l TR II 1 l,: 4. , _ 412 wI6 416 [I �- I `BRUSH " O Sj /� X I; ❑ ( aor 0 ° 116 p Q I 401 X —.ff� I • U 1 x I —x—. \./ I 6 RUSH Tn. ; 0 iI II x— x 1„ iI X 4l1 II \\ ES X 'tix 389 II 1 I X 119al o ` TR'cES VI/1 I 'INC.', I � 400 _ " ____4____________,,,, ____„, I 1,x6 •Loa ) o .--41----- t \________, _i'i • I .9^, -^ �• 'I.-' b y °L-••...•. $i 11. 1 /! - 1,),"- N 181,000 ^ TR � ,•\ • r — LI i l�� iII t II r1"si II Il II it. 00 CI 1___i_ , , j l \ 4 \ TREES I-\,( / X .i. Ii�,. P lqi:10 i I 1 �1 1/ I I (------- �...�.»...,..\.. \9RUSH /l '''. - ' .-0 , I ��4•r 1 i. ,,. i 1 40° . ! ......., , 0 ^ I - .... Y i r 2 �� .1 6 ❑❑ ° f t / \ \\\.‘4\ 1 t it 1 A - t $t ( wt•01I''., i t i a '4),•'''.„t 1 1 ---x•—•(Se.„. g'''i '-,Ilk. _ ( \107 [77 e,• ry i® `Ju 1` L f S`t R n ` ` 'a, 0I \ \ or 0.• V \ . •• .",., 1 --- ag / -- .f • I�0 F a7❑Ball \Illao9 � • ,XL / \ TREES \ 1 i \`l/ • 41L \, ,\\\ ( w.' 1 I f ) \ i •11 0 _ k \'� I Q \, a 1 IQ] ' N179 Iti 400 -7 - \ t •� �\ \. I IN ` , - I' \ \ t .1 -, \ '.\4..\ N . TREES 'ate f X 408 o AP71T6,47S,06 19338 IMI NM \, y EI,671,230.7T •_ _3�3--_ --- _ — a03 �"' �. ___ 00- H a \ I lovni R4-.. 0 v••,.! . WA. ,:.:i:.:e C__L . LVA '61: iterg .. ),,. , , ry,tii1'C e$,e}' . 4..Ny pbr kilo �vj.�A �'S i'w r F :' 0 ..Cve• ,,,,,,. A ' ,. • . lz ,i .c i.... 4. �� �' x�� x� d��k t �,�r� ,c.y ,�#+�. +'` y. ''fit i t, 5 ; ,„ 4 4,' NC'k : s. ,- $. '^ 'Rv*rc 44- 3. J'':1,yn' 4e�v� -t,37M ,� r 'St.-7 ry,` -.1', ,era .' p` ;_. fr • a A".. M tirra�a` r mi, i i +.a t ,, 4 .s ' ,w�£J,:�Kn. vY�.nn as''�. .P •exZ:0'.ul w':7�T a r.+.'•!' Y J}, .i. ., 4. C++.. 41 :.)4.1' 0 .r'', .' 0:1 ?‘ ' .\.\ .A '... ,A,' a : ( &WA V', . . f,-DM!_.:t.L.D.e, *7 . dilelLM/ Ll... Ci f/C .,10 eleil aweiti 7,10 Ia. 0 e/D. ,__. gip ....... . . 140 4eAL.t. -.4 i i imeAtcr .4,f. I-AL -; 621. —640.0frivr4— / /�, A, l fj®/il� iLL//✓4 ®.e !�r44D/ adet &e A # c' /1Z .! V O i//�'f`ty eK4r oe /// ce/ oc.,e/e 1 aft/i/age/A& 4 �� � 2p CO ® ®dl/€o 46' //tz'e'� e G 7 a2 /v Gs� .�--. �,� (: //are7A- 7/ G9 O /isrn'4 s: - L/ .5 �� /i,� �s� X� l, C)04/01% —4/40,0 /A,,eie 9, GI,6 Av ce/tiAi -.e&A6 X4 c i2 '1 �AgrAlG 411/0 x4 2 ®kW ? wGU ' Ae/44r �-g&z« _ 4 �z.G !� x5 11/ , PPS 7®� /®/6.1/ , 4i7.'&4r-kJo /the d/yz/> pe4fr/ .? x5 s iQ / eP•/ 11/5 r*. ., /4, G/t,/fJ OR ie,-/ /f/Gi/ Wa': - /!, ©r PL.A.V4//,i'6 i.// r--4 0 RI;117704 0/Ream e/1A //eA//z6'O e 1,, , ®LOLL. ROM:1761/ - y Gd/ve6/l/f/e1T/#l* 5i4,/,,A4/s�=n.Grec� r%/ oodie 56eweevityar/64/itta96/ /ifi/ i"69 eeitee r24rick 0 4.006lle elear-,64 4,e644 (2//4- i72,<-' �. X4.. /2 -� r ,ham WA ,I.,,, it'i 114 t7/4 , ') 15± ,. 661MA ‘ .' NIA eow ,:,:, 4 s !(1r'I l/ 4�1Y/ /V AA r., ..it �114"ti"' y* ar ...J+�'�' ��r�' yyp del �v ?,n-7",-**, �,�j ;;•Irt' v�"?'��'.'H it, T' p•�4 � `'�',ri �-"�'�,.�,. -+r�' '7—n .:. A Coady e 4 ADA a 4e 40 bt Ac mot 151. t ` i" 3".4 Ad 9gjt IVA 41<iG 0 u 1)O If (40. .. .. ... f-mpAel- A I Air,6, , . —avvivr.frr4— - . r:O/ 4 i, a,66�e/ ae 6 41/A4 ?d v .'//d/6. j, ' ¢ xi- = /. d Co Mogexygov44,- .4:a-4w /i/airr,. ,?-/bi„(, ,f/.,/A0R., i,&/e4,��'at /.t'i"y�G T� lie/ '4,e(7 r6e-- / /fA,' //te, M .-:--5 x,' / AGO. iffre4140 tam 7 ,v ,t/r 1/ xx: d, _e x9_ /2 @411W -L/e r/�a/X , rr /1/7fiv et‘r 4e/41-- 3 ....:....¢ , x ' ° /6 011ielrPielt 4:eil'eu.0(760 7,4-1//4.4,e te, la- x4 vi. /e DUO £' aviverS .A// 4' e lor- ' _- a fo oicv Ace:60/64 / '/a/ 4 ,p , /zz a-� � 2 x 5 s7e /v /7,�/ /i(/6 iY, ''l /' 5 .0 , ,i/41 i ,i-et7- 'a21/4" - k-ar xry & %4 A/5'RR 4717744)/e/Re gailleAl /1/dV,2 7-A4/we //i/e4e4--55' --.- x6"2 , (2. ZecakeN i j a (, /kr / od I� 1 a gag 5W1i7e 61774 1611(e6, .16rr/ *t `/d d/ � x 6. : /6 ®, d ' . ir` ,Y�,y /��f% �� �d' / /�j li/� ' 9- x 4-a /& Ceizege''. 0 /. weer a-mAlw go.kavy am / ,i 4 eieekr grititi i 4-*MI) ---) ,9 •1 camiv 7, _ t toil ,, g s*X 0 z# --,', ./ 14 / 2 c>wwei' ,7«7�s 9PZ1 ��//�iv cr .vim atve � ' o )) 447 a diPe J , i�,1/1/9 4 3 .I P / od ?,174 ,if'p,)i_/'i'9' ?7i9 o �a/ys al /• • -14d - �Ia ,17i'Vfl 12 "9x P ; "/,�-M lyii O22v '� 4,�-w g" 7AJ /ca'-v4 �v(og,0/' 0� /V9'" Y1 ,/Vgg®7/iyon A'0 N 0/ 'PX 19 as-1 9 t IVY 0�YiOnGri .f/ 97 � /I,LI/Y® Q m *X °7- y ,/ „ fr7 AY9/7- ii /a/Y o) p6X`z' z / .Pdif A 1 ,W0efe rifel // 271V ' ,iiii1VA/1061 el V I X -0 4,--//r 1)(PW Ci°7 ifirdfrOVOTI/da 7 4 9 0 r. , „ffl,., \ C- Ten r do 17fxfoiv (9 we f;Siv 5 4491/0 &gag fif, /1/DW'1 7 P/C1011/4e j x,a q 4,;,, .....,km yy . '-v., c... ,diy;-„,„ a" ,, , , 'i J Y '' 4.; , ' l, 4 ',1i 1a ; ZX„{ '.I p. 4 � ; d , a y , r t, r. E h a'! "k " a ,a:: r .# '`t i. v;', # i °� `. '. 'c ,'.v .rfw ..+, j''''' ' i i e „271v, ta.,4 AI"s ! .' , 15 � y:: . e w 4-1 AG r 4-V icy;: I 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JUNE 16, 1981 , AT 9 :00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1 . DOMINIC J. COLASURDO Application for special permit for fill and grade in B-1 zone, File No. SP-024-81 ; property located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Avenue N.E. 2 . J. ANTHONY IVE Application for site approval for construction of orthodontic clinic in P-1 zone for Dr. Brain and Dr. Dunnington, File No. SA-052-81 ; property located west of Talbot Road South approximately one-fourth mile south of South 37th Street and immediately north of Valley General Hospital. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 16, 1981 , AT 9: 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: June 1 , 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 29th -day of May, 1981 . SIGNED: `/�1eze-s'r.4en__ Gip L.-XS mtaX)• • Lt—Lc. " 1 ' 2„.'. • r '.'4 .-.,,Y ; - Ng. • ,,,•: i,,, ,- , ,*-, `•,..,1,1P„„ ,— ,,,,,,,y,,rs :c. : , , '. s —' - • , -N, .,,i! ..--' ,,r, GENERAL LOCATION: AIM, OR ADDRESS.. PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 4th STREET APPROXIMATELY 160 FEET EAST OF UNION AVENUE N.E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ON FILE IN THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF v,,:.,,„; 5.. et .t,• ' s.;,. 't, ..,,10-:. ;:', ..„ , . , , .„,.; v, ,.,,,, .. -,.L,:r f' *,-.. L,....,,,, 't , •• ,t! ',I. TO BE • HEL IN CITY COUNCIL CHARA tERS, MUTACIPAL 0 UILDING ON JUNE 16, 1981 1„, 1 fEGIN"ING AT 9:00 A.M. — , i P.M. ,..‘ ,,,,..„ 1:.' . Idor t4,.. NG . F., . 44 IN ri ,... ,.. ..4 ,,, 4 .,$$'' , tr. , t ,,, '..,, , .. 1 Nit 1 , . It , .1 , ..• 111 , ' r ;''.,,7. & ... SP-024-81 (4.,` ,.1 .1: ' ':,- " , • .-,, , ,, •••, TO FILL AND GRADE *i'!•,:a. Il .k,:,-", „, i , 0 •T .'i. ''' .t,,, ; 'i • '''' ,f *F . :. tar', 1%. .14 , A, 1 , . . 1, , , A ,,, , t , ;-, „ I 4 , .,, •, r', ,,, , 4 .4."" 4 . ''' Lif, i'E '- ' INI At',' GEMENT PERMIll • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THI- NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER ,UTHORIZATION C-01 Rs,� de Vfi . o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 0 ® . BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR o PLANNING DEPARTMENT 94 co- 235- 2550 0,941 7- eD SEPlet° May 29, 1981 Mr. Dominic J. Colasurdo 15440 S.E. May Valley Road * Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Application for special permit for fill and grade in B-1 zone; File No. SP-024-81 ; property located on the south side of N.E. 4th. Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Avenue N.E. Dear Mr. Colasurdo: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on March 4 , 1981 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for June 16 , 1981 , at 9 :00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours, 1\Si44A!, o 1JoT�� Roger J. Blaylock Associate Planner IRJB:gh 1 OF R�-v 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 orn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR' • DELORES A. MEAD '90 co' CITY CLERK 09 Eb SEP1°* MEMORANDUM May 22, 1981 TO: Hearing Examiner FROM: Maxine Motor, Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: Dominic Colosurdo - Special Permit - SP-024-81 The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of May 18, 1981 considered the appeal of Dominic Colosurdo's Special Permit. The Renton City Council remanded back to the Hearing Examiner the subject of the Domonic Colosurdo appeal requesting further consideration and recommendation. MM:ss 4a- OF R�� � .► 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U `� 0 Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 - i co BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT °9.0 cc.. 235— 2550 °NTF SEP10���P May 18, 1981 MEMORANDUM 0 : PLANNING `AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Randy Rockhill, Chairman Earl Clymer i0.1) John Reed IROM: David R. Clemens , Acting Planning Director RE : ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, COLASURDO APPEAL At the Planning and Development Committee meeting of May 14th, the Committee asked the status of the drainage feature which passes _through the subject property . This department has researched both the USGS and City of Renton topographic basemaps to try to shed additional light on this subject. The USGS maps do not indicate this area as containing a water course, although the scale of the maps is such that a definitive conclusion can not be drawn . The City of Renton basemaps (prepared in the early 1960 ' s) clearly indicate a water course passing through the vicinity of the subject site, although it is unknown whether the location may have been slightly altered by development in the intervening years . Attached for your information are copies of both the USGS and Renton topographic base maps for your consideration. DRC :dc Attachments (2) . ,, .,. -......j:. ---°'. Y. ` `4 .`..y. REES • l x342 I •,• R' .I aII ' 40 r�l•� ,I �• :,, TREES �' � lI ` . 1 1Q �� -A 24 . ci. t: I 1 I. : ( 6 , .. '4;1 �-406 �� e _ . . . I,•-,s ' , - '. •'- .. - • • I-,,4',,,,.: , 1...,24.-',,:'.,-- ,..:•.,,,,,,,,, •,• :, \ •-_,, 1 . ,, .0c,.,. ) • i r . 1. ... . !;,,,..6-rt-i,N .. • '`a5aei::?.;,lGn?:y.d�:V •� .1 . • : . 1 ....- - � '0 1 _j�. '�Vi,. [;",�,.dKtP:.i' :G' -•• • � 15' �.II. I i _4 .I � J ir' ,.j�._%. Yet" '„y,r'. I / :}•• 1\�l. a �_ ,'"'ems'' — --,z, r'«::; r ,L L; -�• • ; :I EY�, I ll ^.,,„....,., ,0 / / ili! „,---,.--- .. , •„.....,: \\ TREES "A \ •I t f tl' • \' R y�co,f •C„, ,:::.,:, „.... ... .„,..... ..., , ,,,r --,,--,714:,•r•!`7-'1,kr,'-,;'':':.•1---i • �o ��1 ' \/./_,....\ .cto - , ,11.l,N >--..... ' .-- --<,, . . ; 7..' .,,d-44 J.::::'•'; '•' -•,-%, • --.\ , • . 7."*"•-,,,,,\\\:,..\.. .‘ . I 11 �— -� .IL \ f, o X. - .1, • ) '. if I � _= \\ mod,•I //(, ,+ fib _� • -�f_, , .\ BR. I .; rir, , ___ i ... ct' ' 7 402 /�_ ft .� —x • • 00 X4 f0 • r * .:°7.1. I i • 4•:� ,;; •�. � I Its' 'coma lf,"/-i�' '; ',I •.I,. I',.:..rIV: ` "r:;.' Ij_ , " . ti^'...�,' , . ...,+.,.r, � f.:o .a�/ ''-+' 11 . ..a , :,•• . tlra,,'' :.:: ..•••••-: ..' "4 .:-0 ill. : ' '' : , : 1!•:;. -:',.1 •' 1 // . I I ee 74 Av. 1j1 ; cc .41j: " r fiL rr— . —" r—r • e II xt/ER J � 1i fi • # s• r' IILTR. , Wx` 5 ' X TREES • • I ' , a` '° ` fr.; ' • • —— iI 1"J FT' / I . x T R i 1" y k'' `:1 • • 'I,�,I� i ::r I r `9 Y' V .. y i V '`Iy .,� 1 1 ' .\ dd P r,_Imo '' ,A;,.`1 BRUSH r:lt•I'Y Inn--w-10—<„ — • 1 I: = ;i Lam/ ' 111\100X �6 ',: sit h {'A i;d of, � .. rfi. •�' � • • • \ • • r' �. .4V k :''a 9 Jk�5,21J i f- [—Ar //- \,....1 ' 1 •d•?1•••'‘''.'-`'2. ':.34 • • . . • „----,... , _ . _„•,.._,-.,r ' . / r • 1 ' '� 4 ..... . / Iiii ... 404.0 r` r,I 1 OF J?i �o Y. ..> o THE CITY OF '. ENTON V 40 7 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 14, ""' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT % 235- 2550 i7. O sEP1E°���P May 14 , 1981 M , (t '' DU :':` TO: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE --\OL) FROM: David R. Clemens, Acting Planning Director RE: APPEAL OF DENIAL, SP-024-81 , COLASUrDO ISSUES OF THE APPEAL: The applicant is appealing the Hearing Examiner ' s decision denying the right to place natural streambed in an underground system, and subsequently fill the subject site. Filling of the subject property was previously considered by the Examiner under SP-032-80. That permit was conditioned upon preservation of the stream channel. The applicant failed to appeal the Examiner' s previous decision. The subject application is a request to modify the prior Examiner decision. The appellant argues that the stream is intermittant, has been filled in other, areas , and is not designated as a sig- nificant stream on the Comprehensive Plan. The Examiner concluded and the Planning Department concurs that the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance requires preservation of the stream (4-2316) . The Planning Department in its recommendation identified four policies contained in the 1981 revisions to the POLICIES ELEMENT of the Comprehensive Plan which call for the preservation of streams and other water related areas. The Planning Commission is considering amendments to the Northeast Area of the Comprehensive Plan, including the desig- nation of the subject stream as a Greenbelt. The applicant states in his appeal that retention of the stream would be detrimental to his future development. This department feels that such a conclusion is unsupported by the recor-d_ and. that there are numerous examples of commercial developments oriented toward streams and other water amenities. RECOMMENDATION: The appellant has failed to identify. an error in fact or law significantly effecting the Examiner' s decision. Therefore, the Examiner' s decision to deny SP-024-81 should be affirmed. 1l O F /�I r! em •.! r siNi/� oa0�: r._j - 0 THE CITY OF RENTON ®� ' Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 twi t•.,r3w'A' o k BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR o PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9,' t• 235- 2550 O,9q�F0 SEPTE���P May 18, 1981 RECEIVE® MEMO rt . U .4 MAY 18 1981 TO : PLANNING.:'•.AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE .. CITY OF RENTON � Randy Rockhill, Chairman CITY COUNCIL Earl Clymer 1.!!1(—.) John Reed FROM: David R. Clemens , Acting Planning Director RE : ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, COLASURDO APPEAL At the Planning and Development Committee meeting of May 14th, the Committee asked the status of the drainage feature which passes ._through the subject property. This department has researched both the USGS and City of Renton topographic basemaps to try to shed additional light on this subject. The USGS maps do not indicate this area as containing a water course , although the scale of the maps is such that a definitive conclusion can not be drawn . The City of Renton basemaps (prepared in the early 1960 ' s) clearly indicate a water course passing through the vicinity of the skect site, although it is unknown whether the location may have been slightly altered by development in the intervening years . Attached for your information are copies of both the USGS and Renton topographic base maps for your consideration . DRC :dc Attachments (2) QI) f.' �A 'may-_— --Y i�' _ ` J [ , `\"\ I .,1 .PIS `-l • T ., TRIES•s I. . \ I J f ''• a '�-- n II , TREES k'_:; ; • • -- • ,. ,� J �, I I `�-—— _ Greenwood Cer y • �i1 k``. II• I ', I \\I `{ \ �� - -- I \` \ : \ • • t' `!.'4'1 z,/ i� ti� I`='I J SNE,...::. � -�� 1 I /� c _ __ ,`' : ;- + ,,'), \ ta>'`. . ° G�-�R __ ff X • _ • .r� - ...,.,,,-,,,.,-. ..- , , _.., , „, ,I ,_... 6.4...,', , . •a' t� G\_ ' � • - �„ r ` ' i �� / BR. I \ I __I 'YTREES I 1 I =3F•; . V - • .y , . ._ 11 • � � vX4;0 ,' (fl .. �� ' a • • , 11 f , .._ r:L• ,., . '' ' •1 ) 1 • ,—•. \ -- =, • 'ER 55/kw.- -_ ' ( r' �f : • r, V - �� ' 34 I (¢L , �1 r � I ' / ^ I _ b ,' - j • x1 • 4 ' II 1 � , � u 11 4fl0,— .. � .. � � ' TREES 3'' N .,.7) Ia(-``:"-�-__y/� n . •F,T --- i �/ f It Ir \ 4. ----, , :,. i . til 1 1,,(._ 1.-/ z ��[-� - Rom`_ t I •- ... i l • sr,i • _ QI .., 1%,:T... r.- Li. .,.. -,,,,,_ ,,,,,1%, ,,,, . -----"----- .'?1"7"7"-7---7,--.,.. h, 1 , ,-„,•• `. I .15' —",46W,14. 774\ . , I\ — I r•1 I " / .. Ii-- _ __ J'• 4770 I ` 7. 9 • �'M. • TT11 %L \ I ?ll '\ C� . J Ih c D ' __________NR..'• '•-,z*,.? ' 1 5 ! ' '' ---1 '—''I 1 / ` \- 1 1 tY r r}' ' , 4 i ) :ii -T - .7tk1 nr" r --- --�- I' f • //lr /// RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting May 18 , 1981 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P . M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council President; RANDALL ROCKHILL, ROBERT COUNCIL HUGHES, EARL CLYMER, THOMAS W. TRIMM AND JOHN REED. Councilman CHARLES F. SHANE arrived at 8:05 p.m. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; MICHAEL IN ATTENDANCE PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; RICHARD HOUGHTON, Acting Public Works Director; LT. DON PERSSON, Police Department; MAXINE MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF MAY 11 , 1981 , AS PRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED. SPECIAL Jackie Aspaas of the Renton Municipal Arts Commission and Helen PRESENTATION Williams of the Renton Annual Art Show presented the art work entit ;c "The Yakima Kid," a serigraph, to the City Council for approval Donated Art from the Renton Annual Art Show. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND TRIMM, Work ACCEPT THE ART WORK ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and notices havingbeen proper published, L. I .D. #320 posted and mailed, Mayor Shinpoch opened the public hearing to cone Waterline sider the Preliminary Assessment Ro-1 for Local Improvement District N 27th Street No. 320 in the amount of $22,825.01 for installation of waterline in NE 27th Street between Edmonds Ave. NE and Devils Elbow. A letter from the Public Works Department reported one protest has been received representing 47.26% of the total assessment roll (60% required to terminate the L. I .D.) . Letter from Paul W. Houser . Jr. , Attorney representing Clarence Jones, 2625 NE 27th St. , re- quested his name be withdrawn from the petition, claiming Mr. Jones ' property was not specifically benefitted as already served by water. Clarence Jones was in attendance and opposed the L. I .D. , claiming adequate water and fire protection. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND CLYMER, Public Hearing be closed. CARRIED. Stredicke moved, Hughes seconded Council authorize and order the construction of the LID, as presnted and refer to the Ways and Means Committee. MOTION FAILED. MOVED BY REED, SECOND TRIMM, RECONSIDER THE PREVIOUS ACTION AND REOPEN public Hearing PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY REED, SECOND TRIMM, CONTINUE Continued to THE PUBLIC HEARING ON L. I .D. #320 UNTIL 6/1.5/81 TO ALLOW THE PUBLIC 6/15/81 WORKS DEPARTMENT TO BRING SOME ALTERNATIVE FORMULAS TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Appeal of Michael Hanis, Attorney, 17234 Springbrook Rd. S, representing Dominic Colasurdo Dominic Colasurdo, Special Permit SP-024-81 , requested Council con- Special Permit sider the subject. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND REED, SUSPEND BUSINESS SP-024-81 AND MOVE TO REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE RE APPEAL OF DOMINIC COLASURDO. CARRIED. The Planning and Development Area: South side Committee report considered the appeal of the decision of the Hearing of NE 4th St. , Examiner dated 4/6/81 and was unable to make recommendation to the 5ast of Union NE Council concerning disposition of the appeal as the two members present were unable to agree whether the Hearing Examiner was correct in the required preservation of the stream. Mr. Hanis presented legal definition of drainage ditch. Mary E. Hamlin, 13025 138th SE refuted the question, claiming natural water course, and explained history of same. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, THAT THE SUBJECT MATTER BE REMANDED BACK TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION AND RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. • PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT MAY 18, 1981 APPEAL - DOMINIC COLASURDO SPECIAL PERMIT SP-024-81 (Referred 4/27/81 ) The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of the decision of the Hearing Examiner dated April 6, 1931 in the above mentioned matter and is unable to make a recommendation to the City Council concerning the disposition of the appeal . The two members of the Committee present at the committee meeting were unable to agree upon whether the Hearing Examiner was correct in determining as a matter of fact that the subject intermittent stream is a natural stream for which every effort must be made to accomplish its preservation as required by Code Section 4-2313(4) . Randy Rockhill , Chairman John Reed pF I 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U 4$ © Z. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 i ma BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 09,� 235- 2550 FO SEPTGo# May 14 , 1981 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FROM: David R. Clemens, Acting Planning Director RE: APPEAL OP DENIAL, SP-024-81 , COLASUrDO ISSUES OF THE APPEAL: The applicant is appealing the Hearing Examiner ' s decision denying the right to place natural streambed in an underground system, and subsequently fill the subject site. Filling of the subject property was previously considered by the Examiner under SP-032-80. That permit was conditioned upon preservation of the stream channel. The applicant failed to appeal the Examiner' s previous decision. The subject application is a request to modify the prior Examiner decision. The appellant argues that the stream is intermittant, has been filled in other areas, and is not designated as a sig- nificant stream on the Comprehensive Plan. The Examiner concluded and the Planning Department concurs that the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance requires preservation of the stream (4-2316) . The Planning Department in its recommendation identified four policies contained in the 1981 revisions to the POLICIES ELEMENT of the Comprehensive Plan which call for the preservation of streams and other water related areas. The Planning Commission is considering amendments to the Northeast Area of the Comprehensive Plan, including the desig- nation of the subject stream as a Greenbelt. The applicant states in his appeal that retention of the stream would be detrimental to his future development. This department feels that such a conclusion is unsupported by the record and that there are numerous examples of commercial developments oriented toward streams and other water amenities. RECOMMENDATION: The appellant has failed to identify an error in fact or law significantly effecting the Examiner ' s decision. Therefore, the Examiner' s decision to deny SP-024-81 should be affirmed. MEMO FROM: CITY CLERK'S OfACE RE: S7'- Oa-Y ``Pi MEMO: t`-6de-tt.eir THANK YOU. Jr .1 MULTIVEST LTD. 17422 108th AVENUE S.E. • SUITE 200 • RENTON,WA 98055 TELEPHONE: (206)255-6064 May 11, 1981 to it ma ti� ram,, City of Renton Mayor and City Council Ns Vi 47 4. Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South cr) �� 444 41, Renton, WA 98055 o .47 ff' ' RE: Appeal Hearing Examiner Decision; ` - c.' Special Permit #SP-024-81 Dear Mayor and City Council: We are owners of approximately 8 acres near the northeast quadrant, of the inter- section of NE 4th Street and Union Avenue NE. It has come to our attention that the Renton Hearing Examiner has required the preservation of a small drainage ditch which crosses a portion of our property, as a condition of granting a request to fill certain property- along the ditch near the southeast quadrant of the intersection (Mr. Colusurdo). We wish to express concerns and opposition to such'a -condition and our support of Mr. Colusurdo's appeal. We are not opposed to the preservation of significant streams and natural areas within the city. However, it appears that the preservation of this particular insignificant man-made ditch which is dry most of the year would not be .in the best interests of the public, and is contrary to other city actions along this particular ditch and along other more significant water bodies. Preserving such a small unattractive ditch would create a nuisance and safety problem, as well a hindrance to site development. It appears that the most logical and reasonable alternative in this particular instance is to allow the proper incorporation of the ditch into the storm drainage systems required by city ordinance for Mr. Colusurdo's property and future development along its course. Sincerely, Multivest Ltd. ) Jaime da Silva ' - Vice President JdS:cc A Complete Real Estate Development— 1.C,1. Division MULTIVEST LTD. �i 17422 108th AVENUE S.E. • SUITE 200 • RENTON,WA 98055 q C5 VC) `, P 0-1 off' o . n City of Renton Mayor and City Council Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, -WA 98055 • NE- COPIES TO: ' SENT V CITY ATTORNEY{ S . OFFICE RECORD CHRONICLE (PRESS) y MAYOR' S OFFICE X CITY COUNCIL IJ LC FINANCE DEPARTMENT X HEARING EXAMINER ri PLANNING DEPARTMENT NIC PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR •X PARK DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT POLICE' DEPARTMENT 2P a4)-leyt.-9,4 . x Ro-y\ Th_19,0„4,, , J For -Use By City Clerk's ,Office Only A. I . # 4;7 AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMI;TING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. City Clerk's Office For Agenda Of April 27, 1981 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Del Mead (Name). - Agenda Status: SUBJEST: Appeal of Hearing Examiner' s Consent Decisiion - Dominic Colosurdo 4-6-81 Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution Old Business . Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach, New Business Study Session Appeal Other Hearing Examiner's Decision 4-6-81 0. City Clerk' s Letter - 4-17-81 Approval :, Legal Dept.. Yes . No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Refer to Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A Planning Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation-.• $ " Budgeted Transfer Required , SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary. ) Appeal filed by Dominic Colosurdo on April 17, 1.981 . PARTIE► OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: - SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. clor.44,e SP- o:z414/ Renton City Council 4/27/81 Page 2 Audience Comment - Continued - Planning and Development Committee Report - Continued enton Village Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented eterinary committee report regarding appeal of Renton Village Veterinary upply Co. Supply Co. Rezone R-137-80 and Variance V-007-80 referred to Rezone R-137-80 committee 4/6/81 . The report explained consideration of the appeal and Variance 007 of the Hearing Examiner recommendation dated 2/27/81 as modified by the correspondence of the Hearing Examiner dated 3/10/81 and 3/16/81 and found that Conclusion No. 6 is in error in that there is no blockage of view caused by the proposed variance. The report recommended the City Council grant the variance as requested by the applicant to allow construction of structural improvements no greater than 10 feet from the property line between the appli- cant and the State Highway. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND REED, CON- CUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Fire Damage Police Lt. Persson reported fire destroyed the Frank Cenkovich home this evening, 2625 Benson Rd. Snag Bausono, Mrs. Cenkovich's father, was admitted to the hospital . Recess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. 9: 12 p.m. Council reconvened at 9:28 p.m. Roll Call : All Councilmen present; Shane arrived shortly. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion, which follows the business matters included: Police Travel. Letter from Police Chief Darby requested Council approval for Detective James Foust to attend the Western States Crime Conference in Santa Cruz, CA 5/4-6/81 . Advance travel requested in amount of $450. Council concur. Qochnahl Letter from City Clerk presented the l0o Letter of Intent to annex Annexation property to the City as petitioned by Dennis Dochnahl . State law • Proposed requires signatures on the letter represent not less than 10% of the assessed value of the lands to be annexed; Planning Department Public Meeting certified signatures represent 68.34% of the assessed value. The 6/8/81 letter explained the Legislative Body, at the public meeting, will need to determine whether to accept the letter of intent; require adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and pre- existing bonded indebtedness, and to authorize circulation of the 75% petition. The proposed annexation is located at SE 128th St. and 136th Ave. SE. Council set 6/8/81 for public meeting. Court Case Complaint for Damages was filed in District Justice Court of King County by Washington Natural Gas Co. for alleged copper water service layed over 2" gas main. Refer to City Attorney. Environmental Letter from Planning Department requested temporary Environmental Review Review Committee appointment of Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, Committee for the period 4/27 - 5/8/81 as the Environmental Ordinance provides that the ERC consists of three department heads and Acting Planning Director David Clemens will be attending a planning conference in Boston. Council concur. Travel Letter from the Finance Department requested an amendment to Approval Resolution #2255 to allow the Mayor to approve in-state and out-of- state travel deleting the requirement for Council approval . Refer to the Ways and Means Committee for amendment to the resolution. Appeal An appeal has been filed by Dominic Colasurdo re Land Use Hearing Dominic Examiner's recommendation of 4/6/81 Special Permit SP-024-81 to C{olasurdo fill and grade existing drainage ditch and install storm drains; Special Permit located on south side of NE 4th St. east of Union Ave. NE. Refer to the Planning and Development Committee. Damages Claim Claim for Damages was filed by Menalee Adams, 152.1 SE 6th, Portland, Oregon, for alleged injuries sustained from collision at the inter- section of Rainier Ave.. S and S 3rd Place. Claim filed in the amount of $80,000. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. ' r RENTON CITY COUNCIL. Regular Meeting April 27 , 1981 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P . M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council President; JOHN REED, CHARLES F. COUNCIL SHANE, THOMAS W. TRIMM, EARL CLYMER, ROBERT HUGHES AND RANDALL ROCKHILL. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; IN ATTENDANCE MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk; RON NELSON, Building Director; RICHARD HOUGHTON, Public Works Director; LT. DON PERSSON, Police Dept. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF APRIL 20, 1981 AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, Street Vacation published and mailed, Mayor Shinpoch opened the Public Hearing to Portion of consider the vacation of a portion of Jefferson Ave. NE located Jefferson Ave NE between NE 10th St. and NE 9th St. , Lots 32 and 33, petitioned by Highlands Highlands Community Church, 3031 NE 10th St. Letter from the Community Church Board of Public Works recommended approval of the proposed street VAC-1-81 vacation and explained the right-of-way is not necessary to the City's traffic circulation in the area, that easements must be maintained over the entire right-of-way. The Board recommended the value of the land be set at $2.60 per square foot, and that one- half or $1 .30 be charged to the applicant per sq.• ft. Persons present Don Schlemeier, 14220 145th SE, represented Highlands Community Church, explained the 36 year history of the church, the need for additional parking spaces and proposed growth. Mr. Schlemeier asked Council approval of Jefferson Ave. NE street vacation, support for temporary use permit of 4.59 acre site (matter before the Hearing Examiner) to allow parking and the street be deeded to the church at nominal fee, claiming lack of street maintenance and present City liability. C. Gevers, 900 Kirkland Ave. NE, recalled 1976 hearings for proposed street vacation, noting vacation had been denied due to area traffic problems and feared adverse traffic patterns on Kirkland with vacation. Kay Johnson, 912 Kirkland Ave. NE, objected to, egress onto Kirkland. Acting Public Works Director Houghton used map and explained streets of the area, including "phantom" street which is not dedicated right-of-way. Mr. Schlemeier explained prior 1976 proposed street vacation had been petitioned by Globe Develop- ment Co. Parking in the Highlands Church area was discussed and upon inquiry, Public Works Director Houghton favored vacation to provide parking facility, noting trash being dumped on Jefferson NE. Versie Vaupel , 400 Cedar Ave. S. , inquired if procedure differed for vacation by individual , church or business and was advised by City Attorney Warren that the Council has authority to charge up to one- half of the assessed value irrespective of petitioner. Following further discussion, it was MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND STREDICKE, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BY ROCKHILL, the Petitioner be granted vacation subject to restricted use permit with reversionary clause to the City if not used for church parking, the City retain its utility easements and fee of one-fourth assessed value be charged. MOTION FAILED. Vacation Granted MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, COUNCIL GRANT THE VACATION SUBJECT , with Reversionary TO RESTRICTIVE USE PERMIT, INCLUDING A REVERSIONARY CLAUSE THAT Clause PROPERTY REVERT TO THE CITY IF NOT USED AS A PARKING LOT, EASEMENTS BE RETAINED AND NO FEE BE CHARGED. ROLL CALL: 5-AYES: REED, TRIMM, CLYMER, HUGHES, ROCKHILL; 2-NO: STREDICKE AND SHANE. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Phillip Irwin, 905 Talbot Rd. S, requested Council consider the Appeal of appeal of Hearing Examiner decision on application of the Renton Renton Village Village Veterinary Supply Co. Rezone R-137-80 V-007-80. MOVED BY Veterinary STREDICKE, SECOND ROCKHILL, THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Supply Co. REPORT BE. PRESENTED TO COUNCIL AT THIS TIME. CARRIED. OF R4,,. o THE CITY OF RENTON `$ © Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 09,0 co- CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 01'g7.eD SEPTE" April 17, 1981 APPEAL FILED BY DOMINIC COLOSURDO RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision Dated 4/6/81 , Special Permit SP-024-81 , Fill and Grade Existing Drainage Ditch and Install Storm Drains. To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title 4, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner' s decision has been filed with the City Clerk, along with the proper fee of $25.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council ' s Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. Please contact the Council Secretary 235-2586, for date and time of • the committee and council meetings, should you desire to attend. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON 7 4.66tet Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM/ss OF RA,A 'SW 46o THE CITY OF RENTON ♦$ 0 z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 mm. o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 0'9,0 cD' CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 0 94TED SEPI°11°�P April 17, 1981 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of. Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 17th day of April , 1981 , at the hour of 5:00 p.m. , your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail , to all parties of record, a true and correct NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THE HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION FILED BY DOMINIC COLOSURDO. Special Permit SP-024-81 . Delores A. =Mead, Citr Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 17th day of April , 1981 . el? Notary Public;_in and- for the State of Washington, residing in King County ss CITY OF RENTON No. 17883 FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTON, WAS HIN TON 98055 �( d 19 'ice RECEIVED OF Pl7?.�/v)rt TOTAL• LLL • AN:-) .J GWEN E. MARS , FINAN D CTOR 4,4 B 4% � v r • • c April 16, 1981 < .� c. TO: Renton City Council Q�g FROM: Dominic Colosurdo d � � cN •��k -',i 65- RE: Appeal Hearing Examiner Decision: ,o , e;; '� �,�; �� Special Permit SP-024-81, Fill & Grade OPV Existing Drainage Ditch and Install Storm D az I hereby respectfully request that the Renton City Council reverse the Hearing Examiner's decision on the subject appli- cation and approve the request for fill and grade. This appeal is based upon the following errors in fact and law: 1. The subject drainage ditch is not a natural stream. It is not even desirous as a greenbelt because of its generally dry character most of the year. It is wet only during certain times when it accepts drainage from surrounding development. Therefore, to apply Section 4-2316 of the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance to force preserva- tion of such a ditch is an error in law and fact. Surely the Council in adopting such a plicy meant for it to apply to those significant streams, creeks, rivers and re- lated greenbelts of sufficent size and beauty to warrant such preservation. The subject ditch is not of such character either as a stream or greenbelt. 2. Item 10. of the Examiner's findings failed to note those developments in the area which filled or plan : to fill over existing streams. The new Albertson-Pay N Save-Ernst Shopping Center at Sunset and Duval was built over Honey Creek which is a year-round stream. There are also plans for a 12-unit condominium project north of N.E. 4th Street which has been approved and will culvert and fill the same drainage ditch that I am required to leave open. The ditch has also been filled further south of the site on property located in King County (McCann property). 3. Item 7. of the Examiner's decision fails to note that the Comprehensive Plan does not indicate the subject drainage ditch as a greenbelt, which implies that it was not consid- ered significant enough for preservation by the planners. 4. Item 4. of the Examiner's decision failed to note that the plans for storm drainage facilities, including storm retention/detention, were reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and the Building Department. Both departments feel the plans submitted are acceptable and meet City requirements. . April 16, 1981 Page Two 5. Item 6. of the findings is in error. All of the property is zoned B-1 Business. 6. Item 2. of the Conclusions implies that filling of the drainage ditch will cause flooding and environmental degradation. Actually, a controlled storm drainage system designed in compliance with the City's Storm Drainage Ordinance will improve the existing situation by controlling drainage and runoff. Creating a narrow open ditch will not only be an unsightly garbage trap, it will also be a safety hazard. Therefore, the "public interest" as stated in Item 1. of the Conclusions would actually be better served by providing the proper storm drainage facilities as pro- posed. The Examiner also failed to rely upon the decision of the Environmental Review Committee which issued a negative declaration of environmental impact for the subject proposal. S ed: Dominic Colasurdo R4'FI\/Ea s� �,I� 1 April 6, 1981 - APR 6 1981 I •ed %.15 __.......— O F,i CE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON RESORT ANbr-DEC"IS ION, APPLICANT: Dom Dominic -Colasurdo F I LE:.NO; . SP-024-81 LOCATION: South side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 160 'feet east of Union Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval of a Special Permit to fill and grade an existing drainage ditch and install storm drains on the subject site. ' SUM1ARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Denial Hearing Examiner Decision: Denial PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on March 25, 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on March 31 , 1981 at 9:50 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the report, and entered the following exhibits' into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Plan designating filled area and • proposed fill area ' . Mr. Blaylock advised receipt ofadditional information from the applicant. on March'30, 1981 , following issuance of the Planning Department report recommending' denial ',of the application. The Examiner noted that the letter and four accompanying photographs are contained within Exhibit #1 . The letter provides justification for the infeasibili'tyrof provision of an open drainage system through the subject property required by the Examiner as a condition of -pproval on a previous special permit application for the' purpose'of protecting an . '. exi ting natural stream. ' The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Dominic Colasurdo . 15440 S.E. May Valley Road Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Colasurdo indicated that the submitted photographs which were taken March 12, 1981 show tha the existing ditch is dry except during periods following heavy storms when water froi1n surrounding paved parking lots flows through it. He noted that it is inaccurate to state that an intermittent stream exists on the property, and the ditch is now overgrown with brush and weeds. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. Since there were no further comments, the hearing regarding File No.:.SP-024-81 was closed .by 'the Examiner at 10:02 a.m. 1 L. _24-81 Page Two FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a special permit to grade and fill an existing drainage ditch and install storm drains and culverts on the subject site. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. The subject property is located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Avenue N.E. The site is generally level as a result of a fill carried out under special permit, File No. SP-032-80. The previous approval for fill and grade prohibited the elimination of the drainage channel which carries an intermittent stream. 6. The subject site is zoned both B-I (Business/Commercial) and R-3 (Medium Density Multifamily) . The B-1 zoning fronts along N.E. 4th Street. The R-3 zoning lies along the south property line. 7. •The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial uses. 8. The Planning Department recommended that the special permit be denied. 9. The previously approved special permit allowed filling and grading on the subject site with the exception of the intermittent stream. The stream is generally active during wet periods. The applicant proposes undergrounding the stream through a culvert and leveling the entire site. 10. Sunset Square development, a commercial project, is incorporating a stream into the design layout of its shopping center. Cedar Ridge is constructing a series of intermittent streams to channel storm water during wet periods. These periodically dry channels are also being incorporated into the design layout. Earlington Industrial Park proposes incorporating a major stream into its final proposal . CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The applicant has not demonstrated that potential development of the subject site cannot incorporate a natural drainage channel into its final design. As previously determined, the public interest would be better served by the incorporation of such naturally occurring features into a project. Less area will be covered with an impermeable surface, thereby lessening the burden on the remainder of the storm drainage system. 2. The continued loss of minor streams and channels has led to increased flooding. Undergrounding and culverting the stream will eliminate the natural absorption which would or could have occurred along the banks of the channel and increase the potential for flooding downstream. 3. Section 4-2316 of the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance requires that "every effort" at preservation of natural water courses be made. Similar types of development have complied with this section and have incorporated natural features including intermittent stream channels into the final design plans. The permit, therefore, should be denied. DECISION: The special permit to fill and grade the intermittent stream channel on the subject site is denied. SP-( 81 Page Three ORDERED THIS 6th day of April , 1981 . )(CLIA.4--------- . Fr . fman ed J Land Use acing Examiner, TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of April , 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: ' Dominic Colasurdo, 15440 S.E. May Valley Road, Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of April , 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y.•.Shinpoch Councilman Richard'M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before April 20, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure; errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, tak further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting oth r specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in sai department. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 6th day of April , 1981 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this 6 14 day of , 19 e/ e Notary Public in and for t e Sta of Washington, residing a Application, Petition or Case: Dominic Colasurdo; SP-024-81 (The minutes contain a tit a4 the pcvrtLes 04 necand. ) • Affitavit •'f Pi. Nicoll:#n • STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. Michele ROC being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says that she is the ''�'I Of Clerk of .. THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is NOTICE OF ;"t ., , Iafctdals,sld3 so�vara and now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the ENVIRON�3ENTAL.:` " appu a nos, running aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Daily Record DETERMINATION from the existing manitole Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Environmental at Otto Intersection of N.E. Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, Review Committee Sunset Boulevaid and Renton;Washington Duvall Avenue N.E., ' Washington.That the annexed is a TYQ��i O® a Environtvtental Pe- northerly a"distance of g VieW.Committee(ERC) has 750 feel(S-2g3). issuers a fine!declaration of •. Further. Information re- •' • r�,on-significance•for•the fo!- ,:•gardinag these;actions is av-. towing projects: atiable In the Planning De- 9. MICHAEL. . .BUMS- partment, Municipal Build- ATEAD(ECF-021-81) Ing, Renton, Washington, as it was published in regular issues(andApplication forconditIona! 235-2550.Any appeal of the not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period use. 8600 sqr ffttitm chine shop with the Hen aring Exam!nedr with asphalt parking lat by MC arch 29, 1581. of �. consecutive issues,commencing on the end landscaping; an S�i ro;File No.. Published In the Daily Re- p property lo= cord•Chronicle March 16, 16 March 1s81'.cated vicinity of 3500 N.E. R6418 day of ,19 81 -,and ending the 4tlr Street. 2.DOMINIC J: COLASUR- DO(ECF-023-81)-_. - • Application for special . day of ,19 both dates permit for fill and grade in inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- _:•B-1-zone;-File No. SP- ' scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee ; '024-81; property located on the south side Of N.E. charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ 29°Q7which • 4th,Street approximately has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the 1vees t ,4 • Union Avenue first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent N.E. ,insertion. ^ 3.CITY• •OF : 'RENTON. (UTILITIES DEPART •/�.� . .. . • MENT) (ECF-024-89) i .. .WATER L.I.D.NO.,317 Application for; approval.. - Chief Cl e r°k o1.irlstailation of'approxi- mately,1250 lineal feet of .Es" D.I. water main and Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17 appurtenances In South day of 132nd Street lying bet- I ifeeh'80th Avenue South March , 19 83. • and 84th'Avenue South • (W-613) 4.'CITY. OF' RENTON .. (UTILITIES DEPART- Notary Public in and for th State of Washington, MENT) (ECF-025..81) residing at *tit, King County. SAN.(TA RY. SEWEH _ a� 9d1' 1 :,•L.I.D.NO.-321 Application,for approval of= neal Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June ' foot etof 8"P.V.C..of sa nary 9th, 1955. .sever pipe together with Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. • y I V.P.C.Form No.87 Roy.7.79 t 1., y r t . I� ^y n t Il , V .. f ' lic,"*A s ,\ , . , .A...,,,,,,,i, .... r r 11 y,r• 41i,1. �r's ,4 Oalia 1/.,(1-, J p l G> 0/ / ' /71s/X ' 14.f.0 l4-//j'�'z_./S . , • I' '-.t " • , ,. • • , ••••••• . . n • , . . ..,...,' ' • i . . .t•,`"it ' ,+ •4 it.,,' ••••• 4.• • ,i t . ,-- •, .' - . , ' ilk-.I:0, , •,1 • , i• ' t r •*. : . . .• ,. , , , 4 .. • 'P t„.• -•,,L • •,•t,' • ' '•• , . • •4 , i-')•,,A' ' -1 , •••-• . , , ,,,,•••• .• 1,,•0 - ,• et, , i• • . 4 (.4 - , 4 P ' • ' ... .4 '4 ` - *IL' • . . $'i. P ' ,,.; •• ' , 4.- • , , • , . •-. • . , .• . . , . •4 r ..,. -' ''v ,•• . . . . , ' ' ••42.fir.: ';,T .:-.. '. . ilitie , -• - '' . - . ' A • ' ".. • 4',jri,*'' -. ' ' ." L; ,..Of 2.4 ..C°.,. • ,. : 1 .. ',, .,I, . •F,.•'.4 ri..4 • . ...• . 4 ', I. . , ' - f's1 • , • -4, :.% ,'• 0 , ,, , .‘,— . jP, ' , .V ot ' 'dr ' : • • s'•• . it • , . .., ....L....-......4......„•.... ‘,- 4 St�Hd//-75 07-7 X !sti e7 f. / k in of mid o- d o./vev7 pip k1 cie /\./ onc/ )` Of g id ditol/ �` rck / . / i f 1 } •.. �z F 1..1� • • e P./ 1, q 1. S.." .,+ . ..., , . ice'`r •II -i.0;,;:.•..-i-.v:fr, .- , • � q �r 3 r - 1 t/ t-e y . - /V e - c/, td -cDnd /-z e h/7, -7 .11 y i C. 14 • ' wyo w . r , S'7- 14c0)-7I e7 eS//s7.`ivi ? -f/// /ook i o a t a d] e i i'i'i p / ev y � to 7`le east. Di 7`(°G) 70es threci .2 /4 the rmidd e-g1. 4,i^ , •% I . /4G1 • Dominic J. Colasurdo . • 15440 S.E. May Valley Rd. Renton, Washington 9$055 City Of Renton March 30, 1981 Planning Department Dear Sirs: The following are some good reasons why an open drainage system through my ' property and adjoining property is not feasible. 1. The open drainage ditch would average about eight feet deep and would be very hard to keep clean from debri, over growing with brush and ditch bank from caving in. 2. The location of said drainage ditch would take away about a third of my frontage on N.E. 4th. It would leave an unsitely and dangerous hole about eight feet deep and about forty feet fronting N.E. 4th and about 1501 long. 3® An open drainage ditch through adjoining property to the East would create all kinds of problems for the owner because it would be going right through the middle of his property. 4. The only time there is water in drainage ditch is after heavy rains. . 5.. If an approved storm drain could be installed now it would allow me to finish filling and install a temporary sedimentation system. The storm drain would clean up water in present ditch and the temporary sedimentation system would take care of runoff from vacant land. It would also allow land fill to settle for awhile for compaction. 6. The property across N.E. 4th from said property was filled with about six feet of fill and the same drainage• ditch was left open. It is now covered with brush and debri and partially plugged, you can hardly tell that there is a ditch there. The same thing would happen on this prop— erty too. There are pictures for exhibit showing some of these above conditions that are presently there. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER MARa ( (fin 3 o 981 ,Sll/7�`\\ AIR FM ' jam � re181911091 ":3:41156 z Q • cerely, A ‘ ,o Dominic J. Colas R1"ME‘\1`fr • .evision 3/1981 31 its/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: Pec7,4 /'EA'nli /rE /'—& ' c1,dja s71 � /l' v /sc WE GijeS75/?f�. (Iia!na e 'fch �/A1 df' ' � /�,�ta l�sor. a c�r��ors Location: .$. $e• OC[ "tie-ce•z2e7C � O��'� /gO '& 4i Applicant: 4,4serje/ D& iiv/e JQ: ❑Public Works Department ®Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3////8/ ['Trott' Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 3�3//e tilit'es Eng. Division ire Department ❑Parks Department ❑Building Department ❑ Police Department ❑Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS' REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON ,, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIIVISION: ,[Approved ® Approved with Conditions ❑ Not Approved YSignature of Director or hor' ed Representative DATE: �j �� hf ' ( I c.l REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: � �' � Il /Vj. El Approved ❑Approved with Conditions ❑Not Approved kW 27 1981 �NGDE�� C� S / - DATE: 3/2 l�"I Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ' Date circulated : "Wit/ Comments due : //e/ / ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 3 - ® APPLICATION No (s) . 3-/9-0079—�/ PROPONENT : C®1/Q,$0,4�f f)BAN,i/p/ 7_ PROJECT TITLE : ,.5:pee a/ s- ®'74 Brief Description off Project : �d� e • 9 O e- ardp.Ptetra c{t‘ ®pt p roper-4;1 j '...)st.SA/0/s 4 v . d ra i o,Z LOCATION : S. S//e of&t/€ (t 4f e r4rox. /6O ' . Ifai®a 4P *'' SITE AREA : BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT ',REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : • ✓ yr 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 'f 5 ) Animal life : ✓ 6) Noise : ./// 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north: east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction :_ 9) Natural resources : V ✓ • 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : '/ 12 ) Number of Dwellings : • 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : _ ✓14 ) Public services : _ , 15 ) Energy : ✓ 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health: ✓ 18) Aesthetics : // 19 ) Recreation : ,J 20) Archeology/history : ✓ COMMENTS : g—RE/v?,. 21 vo Recommendation : DNSI / DOS More inform tio�r""rr~ Reviewed 7 :25,i; L frfD S �G 44/ Date : 0 FORM: ERC-06 %- Date circulated : ,��0/ Comments due : WAO/Cji ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW STREET 1 SiE,CF -t,�3 - S i APPLICATION No (s) .,j/d-Do?4/-41 PROPONENT : C04,5Or/O, Iô9itic PROJECT TITLE: .S�eciS�riv,►,v•..74 Brief Description of Project : 4 e f r p • 6Y4ar di./L opt 70reloeb,.It) 4.1KsA/is&WacIvc, Pi LOCATION : S. sale o f Ake cif •SY•ez-Mrp.k. / O'e. 4(/.21/00 Ate. 44- SITE AREA : i BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 1 ' 1 IMPACT4REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : ,,i 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : V 3) Water & water 'courses : ✓ 4) Plant life : ✓ 5 ) Animal life: ✓ 6) Noise : ✓ 7) Light & glare : ,✓ 8) Land Use ; north: east : • south: west.: Land use conflicts: View obstruction : / 9) Natural resources : o� 10 ) Risk of upset : j✓ 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : , 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services: 1 tr , 15) Energy : ,✓, 16) 'Utilities: v// 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics: t7 19 ) Recreation: i✓ �0F f� � 20) Archeology/history : /� 11-11 b '�\ COMMENTS : MAR 27 1981 4t.) \‘'s ,y, :/: . __ Dew/ Recommendation . iNS , ✓ D More Information Reviewed by :li 1 TitlesGefE � Date : '� FORM: ERC-06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 31 , 1981 APPLICANT : DOMINIC COLASURDO FILE NUMBER: SP-024-81 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE. OF REQUEST : The applicant seeks' approval of a Special Permit to fill and grade an existing drainage ditch and install storm drains on the subject site . B. GENERAL INFORMATION :' 1 . Owner of Record: DOMINIC J. COLASURDO 2 . Applicant : DOMINIC J. COLASURDO 3 . Location : ', South side of N.E. 4th (Vicinity Map Attached) Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Avenue N.E. 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : +82 , 755 square feet. 6 . Access : Via N.E. 4th Street 7 . Existing Zoning: B-1, Business Use; R-3 , Residence Multiple Family; minimum lot size 5 ,000 square feet. 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area: B-1 , Business Use; R-3 , Residence Multiple Family; G, General Classification District. 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Commercial . 10 . Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on March 16 , 1981 , and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on March 13 , 1981 . C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 2308 on March 16 , 1967 . It was rezoned from G to B-i and R-3 by Ordinance 2317 on April 13 , 1967 . A Special Permit for fill and grade in the amount of 2 , 000 cubic yards was approved by the Hearing Examiner on August 1 , 1980 (SP-032-80) . D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND 1 . Topography : The subject site is generally level except for a depression in the area to be filled. t PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: DOMINIC COLASURDO, SP-024-81 PAGE TWO 2 . Soils : Alderwood Gravely Sandy Loam (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and , very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to moderate and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber , pasture, berries, row crops , and for urban development . 3 . Vegetation : Virtually all of the natural vegetation on site has been removed. What remains consists principally of scrub grass . 4 . Wildlife : The existing vegetation provides minimal, if any, habitat for area wildlife . 5 . Water : Some water was present in the drainage ditch along the northeasterly corner of the subject site (March 31 , 1981) . 6. Land Use : The site is presently vacant . E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties are in a transitional state from undeveloped and large-lot single family uses to light commer- cial and some multiple family . F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : A 4" water main extends east-west on N.E. 4th Street adjacent to the subject' site and a 16" main runs north-south on Union Avenue adjacent to the property . An 8" sanitary sewer is also located along N.E. 4th Street within 1 ,000 feet to the west of the site . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route 107 operates along Union Avenue N .E . within 1/4 mile to the north of the subject site . 4 . Schools : Not applicable . 5 . Recreation : 'Not applicable. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-711 , B-1 , Business Use 2 . Section 4-709A, R-3 , Residence Multiple Family 3 . Section 4-722B , Special Permits H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Comprehensive Plan, 1965 , Land Use Report, Objective 6 , page 18 . I . IMPACT OF THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Filling of the site and undergrounding of the stream will disturb soils and vegetation, increase storm water runoff, and increase traffic and noise levels in the area on a temporary basis . However, through proper development controls and procedures , these impacts can be mitigated. Implementation of the fill could be a precedent for future removal of the stream' s natural character. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: DOMINIC COLASURDO, SP-024-81 PAGE THREE 2 . *Population/Employment : The fill and grade permit will have no direct impact on employment . However, future use of the filled site will have to be addressed upon specific development . 3 . Schools : Not applicable . 4 . Social : Not applicable . 5. Traffic : Assuming 25 cubic yards per trip, approximately 80 vehicle trips will be expected for the filling opera- tion. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THREHOLD DETERMINATION: The Environmental Review Committee issued a declaration of non- significance for the subject proposal on March 15 , 1981 . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4 . City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1. The proposal is consistent with the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan, which designates the site as commercial. 2 . The applicant proposes to fill and grade an existing drainage ditch on the subject site which was not included in a previous fill permit of +2 , 000 cubic yards (SP-032-80) . Storm drain installation is also planned. 3 . Police Department review of the proposal has resulted in the following recommendations : 1 a. Streets are to be kept clean at all times. A cash bond is to be posted to insure that ' cleaning is done . b. Access to the site for hauling operations is to be permitted off Union Avenue N.E. with none allowed from N.E . 4th Street. c . Operations are to be prohibited on Saturdays and Sundays , as the department does not have adequate staff to monitor the activity. 4 . A drainage easement acorss the property and at the dis- charge of the non-owned property must be provided as per Engineering Division comment. An evaluation of the upstream basin will also be required to determine the necessary culvert size through the site . 5 . As noted by the Hearing Examiner in SP-032-80, "The appli- cant has failed to demonstrate that the elimination of a natural drainage system is required. (Section 4-2316 of the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance requires that every effort at preservation of natural water courses is required. ) The Comprehensive Plan has also indicated that natural features should be incorporated, into new develop- ments , and such features should be preserved. " N PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY RPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: DOMINIC COLASURDO, SP-024-81 PAGE FOUR The Examiner further stated that "The applicant has the burden of demonstrating that the ultimate plans for the reuse of the site cannot be reason- ably altered to provide the continued vitality of the stream coursing through the subject site. " The Policies Element of the Comprehensive Plan adopted by the City in January of 1981 includes the following policies relative to water courses : 1 . Storm waters should be retained on-site and then released at a natural rate and quality . The City ' s storm drainage system should be designed to incorpor- ate natural drainage features . " 2 . Precipitation should be returned to the soil at natural rates near where it falls . 3 . Development should be designed to facilitate percolation and to minimize impermeable surfaces . 4. Development should include appropriate design and/or equipment to ensure clean runoff . No specific site development plans have been submitted by the applicant nor have any alternatives to unde(r- grounding the intermittent stream been presented. As a result, the applicant has not demonstrated sufficient justification for the proposal . In the interim, the applicant should install an oil-water separator at the south end of the culvert on N .E. 4th Street and clean up the debris from the existing fill operation . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : Based upon the above analysis , it is recommended that the subject request be denied. • • ' l i I I ' '-vision 3/1981 ?) e(9/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW' SHEET Application: %Yr- 0 Z Alede /reSP Sd R Apeies7e 7g C"/7<ra le •.� c*SI 4_ (I r a g' e lee c.r b+l S,/• Lc-4y-sH dr-4 i n Lo ation: '4t/e etc /46- .&-2 rim-. /6"0 /.6::' ®e ibilee,Pt tin.. 4✓� At) licant: 6hsorclo Amin/it_ IQ ['Public Works Department ®Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Vile,/ ®Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 3/Wei ❑Utilities Eng. Division 0 Fire Department ®Parks Department ®Bui1ding Department 1 `':.o1 i ce Department . ®Others: • , CO ENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED . IN WR TING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON 31/O/9t I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Police Dept. ®Approved .0 Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved .) St eet be kept clean at all times. Cash bond be posted to insure that street cl aning is done. '.) Ac ess to the site be off of Union Ave N.E. , and no acces for hauling operatio be allowed off of N.E. 4th. c) No fill operatic a or Sun. as we do not have personel to monitor the op on Sats. L . Persson DATE: 3/11/81 ---r.:.4 ... -_� Lleiane.. n.1- c n enn e c n ta.l d ua._�—_._._ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:....at___AM.C. i/ Approved 0 Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved i 1 E'-a ,oz--, �__ DATE — J —y Sign / e of Director or(Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ®Approved ®Approved with Conditions ONot Approved Revision 3/1981 - 1 IV/ y y RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: PJAL (--(f- ?Sl� /) �epeoeF7e '7� 8c'%fm-a IE .SbAjeCt-Si 4 6441, _6© 4a4.7€e A anA[r/,er Y/ :fsfl 1/5110I rat i Location: •Sic% e, o f6`9. odoX /go ''.' et" aicvm //vim. .€ Applicant: l�.So rele ‘06 b1/4 IQ: OPublic Works Department DEng •eying Division 'SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ,?/,///.9r f -`raffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 3/1/,9 ❑Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks )epartment []Building Department [� Police Department • Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON 34/0/2i • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved ❑ Approved with Conditions Not Approved a . �s1 DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representativ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: DApproved ►;I Approved with Conditions [] Not Approved C.,. v e---a ro.3 4C (iv—ry -4 . cJ r, �'�e d i .. .dot_s��.¢..7f`Q.-cr vs 6`�1 °ea4:�.�"a-c-. Signature of Director DATE: .3/`7/r/ Si 9 for or Author Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/fTVTGrnm. FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s) : SP-024-81 Environmental Checklist No. : Description of Proposal : Request to fill and grade subject site • (drainage ditch on site) and install storm drains Proponent : DOMINIC COL`ASUR®0 Location of Proposal : South side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Avenue N.E. Lead Agency : PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal was' reviewed by the ERC on March 11, 1981, following a presentation by Steven Munson of the Planning Department . Oral comments were accepted from: Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner Ronald G. Nelson, Building Director David R . Clemens, Acting Planning Director Richard C. Hought'on, Acting Public Works Director Steve Munson, Assistant Planner Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-023-81 are the following: 1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet , prepared by: Steve Munson , DATED : March 9, 1981 2) Applications: SP-024-81 ; 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Planning, Building, Traffic Engineering and Engineering Division. Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact , on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43 .21C.030( 2) (c) . This decision was 'made after review by the lead agency of .a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely, affect subject site or adjacent properties. Signatures•: I � sf Ronald G. Nelson ; D id R. Clemens, Acting Building Director Planning Director R ' char C . oughton, Ac ing Public Works Director . DATE OF PUBLICATION : March 15 . 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD : March 29, 1981 Y I rc-!4 __ ,--" _ ' ! ---' Fri , rri ._ _._ ,..: --LI_ . :,MMM p. • 1, t i K 171 IV PO '\, .....t.. �\ \� 1 L ,! P V • 7. .1. '''''.& •_ N I ai ~� _ . I -- - .... _I -� I ~__ o 0 • • 1 . TACO w • • • • • ,.liii.;.., • .. . TI. . 1• ,. . I � . --4 IIII )., ,,,,,,,;.,-, -r 1.,,,,,:,, ,, 4 '.- 1 �`x`4.',I ..A-a=.•' ,ms!�yr>••Re..,,OP'ro•1- eyi ' . 1hr .. .. , ti a • Fes. .��n I .s•d- - - -.3. _ ,.-- —._ _y , 'a4t' C`� �� 5 n• , s .. ..... Nn. . ,. • . w• t ig • •` k 8T' (fir .r L t w r, a ►,y 3` k. (A I �1 • . O 1 , 040t.st PL. S.E. .1 _,,,::4. .l _•..I_.. 1 —1._1"_ OF R4,'lr A u ° THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o ems o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT -2 t.. 235- 2550 09Ils'1) SEP100 March 13 , 1981 Mr . Dominic J . Colasurdo 15440 S . E . May Valley Road Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Application for special permit for fill and grade in B-1 zone, located on the south side of N . E. 4th Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Avenue N. E . Dear Mr . Colasurdo: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on March 4, 1981 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for March 31 , 1981 , at 9: 00 a .m . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , i 912. • - .4-4(juw% Roger J . Blaylock Associate Planner RJB :gh j 4J}I ^ + • 1 l s1 T t GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: a,..:. £ TE +11EAE .E. STREET APROXIMATELY T OF UNI�� AVENUE r LEGAL DESCRIPTION: . ON FILE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT 'I I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF fit.; i -'.', '' H c N. , wa4:' { uil TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON LIABILLE, 1981 :.EGINNING AT 9,(lfl A.M. P.M. CONCERNING ITEM wif AEZONE ,, SPECIAL PER { .°IT SP-024-81 TO FILL AND GRADE SITE APPROVAL , i • WAIVER , . , • SHORELIE MANAr�.,-. . ENT PERMIT • ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION OF NON—SIGNIFICANCE — DIRECT APPEAL . ' TO HEARING EXAMINER BY MARCH 29, 1981 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 234 2 THIS NOTICE NOT TO E 'REMOVED WITHOUT- PRC 'R AUTHORIZATION 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON , WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON MARCH 31, 1981, AT 9 :00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1. 1ST CITY EQUITIES Application for rezone of 25.9 acres from existing G classification to M-P, file R-057-80 ; a band of property approximately 300 feet in width lying immediately east of the proposed P-1 Channel . 2 . EARLINGTON PARK Application for preliminary plat approval of 25-lot industrial subdivision, file PP-056-80 , property located on the Earlington Golf Course , which lies east of Powell Avenue S.W. and west of the proposed P-1 Channel. 3 . MICHAEL A. BUMSTEAD Application for conditional use permit to construct 9600 square foot machine shop with asphalt parking lot and landscaping, file CU-019-81 ; property located at 3500 N.E . 4th Street . 4. DOMINIC J. COLASURDO Application for special permit for fill and grade in B-1 zone, file SP-024-81 ; property • located on the south side of N .E . 4th Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Avenue N.E . • Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 31, 1981, AT 9:00 A .M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : March 16 , 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREEACONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public , in and for the State of Washington residing in King County , on the , 13th day of March , 1981 . 11, • SIGNED: AP' IA 7461-“A-Je'i (s. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects: 1. MICHAEL A. BUMSTEAD (ECF-021-81) Application for conditional use permit to construct 9600 sq. ft. machine shop with asphalt parking lot and landscaping; File No. CU-019-81; property located vicinity of 3500 N.E. 4th Street. 2. DOMINIC J. COLASURDO (ECF-023-81) Application for special permit for fill and grade in B-1 zone; File No. SP-024-81; property located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Avenue N.E. 3. CITY OF RENTON (UTILITIES DEPARTMENT) (ECF-024-81) WATER L. I.D. NO. 317 Application for approval of installation of approximately 1250 lineal feet of 8" D.I. water main and appurtenances in South 132nd Street lying between 80th Avenue South and 84th Avenue South (W-613) 4. CITY OF RENTON (UTILITIES DEPARTMENT) (ECF-025-81) SANITARY SEWER L.I .D. NO. 321 Application for approval of installation of 750 lineal feet of 8" P.V.C. sanitary sewer pipe together with laterials, side sewers and appurtenances, running from the existing manhole at the intersection of N.E. Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N.E. , northerly a distance of 750 feet (S-293) . Further information regarding these actions is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550 . Any appeal of the ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by March 29, 1981. PUBLISHED: March 15, 1981 FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s ) : SP-024-81 Environmental Checklist No . : ECF-023-81 Description of Proposal : Request to fill and grade subject site ( drainage ditch on site) and install storm drains Proponent : DOMINIC COLASURDO Location of Proposal : South side of N. E. 4th Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Avenue N.E. Lead Agency: PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on March 11, 1981 , following a presentation by Steven Munson of the Planning Department . Oral comments were accepted from: Roger Blaylock , Associate Planner Ronald G. Nelson, Building Director David R . Clemens, Acting Planning Director Richard C . Houghton, Acting Public Works Director Steve Munson, Assistant Planner Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-023-81 are the following: 1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet , prepared by : Steve Munson DATED : March 9, 1981 2) Applications : SP-024-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Planning, Building, Traffic Engineering and Engineering Division . Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment . An EIS is not required under RC4 43 .21C .030( 2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely affect subject site or adjacent properties . Signatures: /.4,1".W Ronald G. Nelson D id R . Clemens, Acting Building Director Planning Director 7( ( ' 441 R ' char C . oughton, Ac ing Public Works Director DATE OF PUBLICATION : March 15 . 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD : March 29 , 1981 . . . . ,. , , .. . 1 I'',- , . „ , , ,, , i P I I, I ,. ,, • I ,, • I • i .... IP 'if ' ' '''I‘t I'P•J ' i • , , 1 I • „ • I I , I ' I 1 , GENERAL ICATION AM), OR ADDRESS: , , LgUTH S'D7' OE NLE. 4TH -liv-th6T PROXIMATELY i I 1 1 1 I u I-EL" .4:Asi OF UNIoN 4R LEGA. Dei E P IPTION: • ,i, , , I .1 1 J ,ON FILE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT I I 1 ,1 IS PoSTEDi TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF , ... r, a. 1 • '4 . a' ,a i,r. , a• a '''' a 1. I 1 I 1 TO BE HELD i ! \ IN CITItICOU , CIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON _JAL ga,3,144:1,a1_ BEGINNING AT _____91011_,A.M. , 1 ,, PM CQNC FINING ITEM [ f R 1 El 1} . , ( N CIIIJ, .... SP-024-81 TO FILL AND GRADE ri giT,1 APR OVAL ,...: , .., . . Arvrn , '- '. '''',, ;.' ' , '% ' 4. ,,,"- 4 n ; ' 4, ,? , , ' t „ 'h ' : : '' 1 ' ' NT PER :., ,I,. I 0i 1 I 1 ; . i, 1 I 1 I' i i : i 1 i I 1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 233 2350 1 ,.., . III1S NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED 'WITHOUT PR i ,-,' AU '• m. ZATION [ , . "evision 3/1981 31 '/ i RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET A plication: $ TC/f L 19eitmir(--S® a?9- 1/) 4, ' 7' IC;//.jr -s: cle biJeci-si LIretir«fe ebiGA elni r,,, r g/37. 4/"So,-,ez.,ca4-ajn� Location: 5/41e eiZe "AVE fl22 7e. 00,49i-0.1 /We `4::•77 ele t/,p, ,+ //vv.. 4/ Applicant: c ,,/dsorIO, Avvvifllr! IQ: ['Public s Department ngineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: vfrtgy ❑Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 3/0?, ❑Utilities Eng. Division ❑Fire Department ❑Parks Department ❑Building Department I ❑ Police Department ❑Others: f COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS, REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON _i 311O12/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved 0 Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved r-rt v,'cie cArki 1-4- .P_..c,Se. 7f_c.Y-o ss 6`-$ J a,� DATE: .379'/dr/ Signature of Director or AuthorIZ Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ®Approved ❑Approved with Conditions [pot Approved . DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative • vision 3/1981 ?p. a/ER/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET A•plication: ,veeplL foe/en es"?- ?4Y-9J /4 oes77 7� Ir'//r jrot c/P c 6 rai a o' c 4' ; ' gd %roe- a • Location: � side et 9. is e. 42,'r0 /go ier: ®e U/►.4v.o Affvcm. 4€ Applicant: 6h sor1®, 11l ini - 0 : ❑Public Works Department: D Engi Bering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Vilgy raffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 3A0F/ ❑Utilities Eng. Division ❑Fire Department ❑Parks Department ❑Building Department ❑ Police Department ['Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON 3fjO/2f REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved [' Approved with Conditions [] Not Approved Oirti L` ! - DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representatives i I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: DApproved ❑Approved with Conditions (]Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative a • , ../ , s ; • , '! '. :,701.5 ., ,,. • ,„ , . .., .. . . ,.... .. ........,...4, ...,... . .... ..„ • • ., . ,, ... . . ,,.., . ....„; , , t ...„ ... , . , ., k . .. . , . ..... 7,,p4,;,, • ,.....: _...... ..",. . . i et, , • ,,, , , ��� �,t �` et, - '11. A / ',, .may_ �� . • w' . 4.F f Z // S p//2 c: 11'7 Ser vis s 7`a1 iek, s 4- /,/L 4-717 ih C1, if-. 47ie `' 3 or- 4 dc? S -�4�/ y /y JL l/ j` C)/%y frt/atek y e s ] ,4brher h E C',1 /Vdrth s - t ��1� J / /9.r/ *IP. . . 'P,';C:• , r 4 .. . .4111.61,1\mic: ' . • ... • . ;. ....-' l :t'' % •Ili AP • •' • 1 .% .%•• an . #: . •LY O.. • , .. ' .11::1 •T i ; ' -1, 4 , VP . . , \ . • . ,,,i'k 4s, . 'ii 7 t yr.t. :4:4 . ,v•,,,, r.s., . .... Ntk,1 - .• ' .** • ,, • >• . - .., • f.'s -- e- - - ': ' ' i . * : •,-. ...I;-'-'• ,-se A*6-10 ' •,-- - , , ( , -..- ,fors:. iv .'i ••„ . . , • •t, .. '. - .• t -.Adz, - •'''''' vJ J O/7 T1// i,%FJ d 6'Gr.�! 6 p? 1,7,; Chi 1 /i-7 ‘-/ /^cy,c `' /-y G' v/ k- 3 c/v y s 01- f-C1, -F / a ' !<Or`' `i. 1, {;� +�, ?I � , ,• 1 t! 0 ft it, ' 'II ice: +r.# :5f i l if„ /Se / / z I A zoo d" 2 U 1 4007 L/-z 4" 11'"-L.5 114 b ‘=r /V f.o y4 L7°S "+< - ti , ..._ .. ,,.,...,/ IIIIP . , ' / . ., ly 4,'. .1 . i d - ,'* ;I . ' , ' - •y' .a {` Is, �•! Hoa t-/� ef-A :3 ` G-o/veep /0/ma c c 1-o s s ii,7 9 /;J47= * 7`* So tti7 v/ /V / I f e v 3 D v- el d ► Node - Liu/ver t e / s DhoL,r- 'i/:, i //mac/ t.tiit* a(,/, �G h i'Q P i r• 1 - 4 jt•. y �J .' _• _ . 1 1•0.r.-+:'ate. ' ..4 1 ..44«. r / 7. to-h-79 ti/ 4 t.4i ov-7 /kr", (7 "/P!ir 4/ 70 Li,L °// HI€ac7 PP eS- th J 4 t/* Staci/ i /V e. 4- �Gr /de)k / 7 /VccA-He v 7�Gi - s 74-c i-77 ///c 7'- - rekv/,y J o e r-,=7 / /6,4 °evision 3/1981 31. 7s?/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT .APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: ' ,oe/Pm efip- Sr-(/JA',oec " jrfror �P 5b 4 jec?-Si (Ira iPate eh'feh luv2r •2r ASA-aS/o -,vvidraiIts Location: S 5 €/e etc /V6 cox 41.61 & ®t' u/t#om /lw. 40 - APPlicant: v rein ,� �i,t � [public Works Department ❑Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 71///4/8/ [Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: —3/3//Q/ ❑Utilities Eng. Division ❑Fire Department ❑Parks:.' -partment uilding Department [:] Police Department ❑Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON 3//O 9/ •1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: C---e)L�C� \N Approved ® Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved I DATE::3 — Jo-(y ) Sign a of Director o Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ❑Approved ❑Approved with Conditions ONot Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ision 3/1981 31 /s)/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Pplication: Ec/,4 toe wir(fP- y-sy.) Apor,s' ? Zi7✓//!-,i'dss I 6A ecl--5e 71.e_ (Irai,ia.je 7'' h e,, yOr6 r 7 ) :hi SAL I: 7o Pm"calra i/is Location: 4". $i®E' de 9i7E cot2trIccie. Q/90,r,OX /go 'e--7, e tt" tf' M Vv. '//- Applicant: ch Su rJO, born/wc_ TO: [Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3///v8/ Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: —3/0/ ['Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Department [ Building Department Police Department [ Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON all®/2® . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Police Dept. Approved U Approved with Conditions ❑ Not Approved 1) Street be kept clean at all times. Cash bond be posted to insure that street u�leaning is done. 2) Access to the site be off of Union Ave N.E. , and no acces for hauling operation be allowed off of N.E. 4th. 3) No fill operatio a or Sun. as we do not have personel to monitor the oper, on Sats. L ?: Persson DATE: 3/11/81 , ignature of Director or Authorized Representative 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ❑Approved ['Approved with Conditions ❑ Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative \ I � Date circulated : ,31//�/ Comments due : WAVW bbENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 3 - 4/ • APPLICATION No (s ) . j/d Oo741—.9,/ PROPONENT : 6/4.svr/0 2ornisie_. PROJECT TITLE : ..fpeci•ther.-pep •74 Brief Description of Project : %fbe if fgr�.Je so4'er 71 f • tJ 601,42,'Ketria d 1 i opt r re�Oe !t) %KS/Zt� S/ v*t cfvc l$ LOCATION : 3 side of Ale c Ntsi•avie)rox, /sO'F• of Uerion .P 44"' SITE AREA : BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI_ Af DOS More Information; ' itle : Reviewed by : _ Date : FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : Comments due : 3/443/ ENIVIR ThJff1ENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - ,) 3 - g/ APPLICATION No (s ) .574-o'Y-8/ PROPONENT : (ol4SorIO ,UO,,i n,a 1,3 PROJECT TITLE : 46,ecesoilT"rePtit Brief Description of Project : Werre5/714 6// firfr 'dP.Sv,44.ie '74- .S/7 e. A[ e dA44 oh prw o r''i ) /m SAY Y circa LOCATION : o'4 doxpo oX. /�� -et anion Ave: Aig— SITE AREA : BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW , NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 1 �_ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses: vim! 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north : Sect+r r Sr�a.�,•— east : Semi /8/de+- '-C3ittlP1 4vtAi/ ii south : ,�} '' west : Je2ie lCS(�7`''// �}.e 'ca CU.S514iO4 5 ,u L ¢J Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : !�- i 11 ) Population/Employment',: 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : !�— traffic impacts : ,14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : �r 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI !/ DOS More Information Reviewed by : teQ_ Noh.ss,. Title : 104,sir,4.f A4soefr-- Date : 3/4.)/e/ /- >�ye/O,i e c tec4 LdYt 6t 0 v,(ed,,,,o14 1 ®1�j�9 4-4411'IOW S)4e� -„-, FORM: ERC-06 [ �. Ir !/`- e. Date circulated : ;._ '/�/,��/ Comments due : �j�/, ,Q, ENVIRONMEINTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF -3 - 9l APPLICATION No (s) m •j/d OAS/—g/ PROPONENT: /4..1 rJ^ / Amii,ic _ 40 PROJECT TITLE : ..1C,r,e/ Ae'r119./•74 Brief Description off Project : 4 c I' r �• rat a�.a �c t c" r fripe,.*It b S e S'1Sr ,�r'et LOCATION : J. S,cue of Ale. �J NtSY•�lorox. let Of af O"ioa vP A4- SITE AREA : BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT ,REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE I INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indiregt air quality : 3) Water & watercourses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north: east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset :" 11 ) Population/Employment : N 12 ) Number of Dwellings :' K 13 ) Trip ends '( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : I L 15 ) Energy : 54( 16 ) Utilities : K 17) Human health: 18) Aesthetics : x 19) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : SI DOS More information Reviewed by : Title : Sa6 Date : FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : , .:44*/ Comments due : V// / ENWIRONHE1TAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF -t9;3 - e9l APPLICATION No(s) ., PROPONENT : ®/4.50 JO/ Amrini,t PROJECT TITLE : 3. e c/o/igsr-no0/74 Brief Description \of Project : /7e a sr r a c • ate14ar J��I�G► o� �rolp�.�T ) ��Et,S /1/-.0 if riot Ciis'a3 N� LOCATION : S S ae ¢AkeC/ eV•a��roae. z- alien AP. /4- SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic ctilanges : 1/ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise: 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north: east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : ✓ 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE`) : traffic impacts: 14) Public services : I ✓ 15 ) Energy : 16) Utilities : 17) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : e/ 19) Recreation : (/ 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI)( DOS More Information Reviewed by : p;e074A- e- Title : Date : 3 /q/%/ FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated: 4,00/ Comments due : V&A/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SWEET E C F -4;3 - 49/ APPLICATION No (s ) . sP o0y-49/ PROPONENT : C,/ESvr°Jor A%'MA's/L PROJECT TITLE : Si),e Rp&-frov '/ Brief Description of Project : ilerbt,s7LAee 0 r I // ' / a ra // //aret_i_ra e�c'1 G► o#t rro p '�.' y� �ikS7't�0���'60,844 Gv'a LOCATION : 5: S,e/e NEY 411,e,r4.x. /Co®F.p D,weirAve iV'` SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT 'REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : .� 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : e, 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life :6) Noise.: 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; nortjh : • east: south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE') : /Z4'2 traffic impacts : be/ 14) Public services : � � • , 15 ) Energy : , 16) Utilities: 17) Human health: 18) Aesthetics: 19) Recreation : L' 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI y DOS More Information Reviewed by : itle : ll�a� � � ci Date : FORM: ERC-06 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MARCH 11 , 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10 : 00 A. M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS : NORTHWEST COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE COMPANY (AUSTIN COMPANY ) ( ECF-602-80 ; SA-092-80) FRED BOWSER (ECF-642-80 ; R-135-80) DAVE BEST (ECF-634-80 ; R-125-80) H. A. AND JANET BLENCOE (ECF-020-81 ) NEW BUSINESS : ECF-021-81 MICHAEL A. BUMSTEAD CU-019-81 Application for conditional use permit to construct 9600 sq . ft . machine shop with asphalt parking lot and landscaping ; property located at 3500 N . E . 4th Street ECF-022-81 STEAK AND ALE OF WASHINGTON , INC . TP-020-81 (JOLLY OX RESTAURANT ) Application for temporary permit to allow a temporary 18 , 000 square foot gravel parking lot for the Jolly Ox Restaurant ; property located on the east side of West Valley Highway at Strander Boulevard ECF-023-81 DOMINIC J . COLASURDO SP-024-81 Application for special permit for fill and grade in B- 1 zone ; property on the south side of N . E . 4th Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Avenue N . E . ECF-024-81 CITY OF RENTON (UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ) W-613 WATER L . I . D . NO . 317 Application for approval of installa- tion of approximately 1250 lineal feet of 8" D . I . water main and appurtenances in South 132nd Street lying between 8oth Avenue South and 84th Avenue South ECF-025-81 CITY OF RENTON ( UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ) S-293 SANITARY SEWER L . I . D . NO . 321 Application for approval of installa- tion of 750 lineal feet of 8" P. V . C . sanitary sewer pipe together with laterials , side sewers and appurtenances , running from the existing manhole at the intersection of N . E . Sunset Boule- vard and Duvall Avenue N . E . , northerly a distance of 750 feet ECF-026-81 STONEBRIDGE COMPANY (LOUIS MALESIS ) SP-025-81 Application for special permit to construct 30-unit townhouse apartment complex ; property located at the east end of N . E . 16th Street and east of Kirkland Avenue N . E . 1 • • 1/; �1 .. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE I��. II "II% I I ' MARCH 11, 1981 AGENDA I, , blat: _ ---- — .-- 1, NW il -1,...c • (//.4),,,r,,,.., ....... HIN I ._ i A 1 -{ i Et • LA • 1/(-:,.• -1_4 \ _ - L 11 - ---- I _-_ ; • � t —\ s --- • ' .1E Pill!Plh'. Mil t • g �� LAKE N,i �Wk..- s�J) � a Ohl. D 31., ,° �� N\ WASHlNGTON {'tt� lil�il>l�/ `' . 4ECF- 81 aMat i .._1-..:::'... '.1,-t..itf1.:14._x.14.1.t e4ii1*i2i1ii.EIkN*. ; - ... ' it r. „ 1 .2 e`er zilII le FR . , = ..z.. .....1.1.1„,,,, , ,....EI li . 14%,0512 Fimigii - �i -.•�y�eft. 2:4.1 TIO ALUS �► isk, WINN \AJMER° j r1PR ■IVIVIIIIMMILT/ IIP .,:iL • I i '''"MiPailifilli347749` INMIlliti: ill ICiiti • µ. E■...rt.1. iNE_ it. K4 `%fiti dan �:nitr��_`' r - p .. 1 1 rail 1 *IL IIIAIV.---.--4t W.. P , ll < ... . ...., .: .,./ ... III 7 10 i i r Pl- -••• -•• ...... ,... .._.......1,..14-rk.„___ . I -6-14 ,-_-AVII I . ) VI! .6111b_74-\114 1:C\.\\I- -•41,broi.;---.;-.-a-' taiNNIINAmiman1111- Ili ll ili Ili7*--L77 I ; 440 _�1 RI TEAK -& T - �a��■ligli fir ►mr4iiiiirmaliel1.6 �4►,_ ` I-� ............ nAriag he LiIT NIMBI.Ilniill • : � a 4g".1 - iii, ..,. NA A •11 \:: \••• , La ii ,, ...:„. . , j :: . -,„,,,i • j , .1. ,1 cii _____ LAKE • i 1Ell 14 YOUNGS `t` 1 11. 41 I ,MI �. f� 0 FtrAN .�, pr February 25, 1981 ( 8, FEB 2ti 19J _ Hearing Examiner T' City of Renton , g. RE: Conditional Use Permit A request is being made to you for a conditional use permit on a property located in N.E. Renton. (See attached letter) The subject, property has been zoned for B-1 and a usage of L-I is being proposed. The property directly to the west side of the subject property is used as a garage and storage yard for heavy equipment. Running along the east side of the property all the way south to S.E. 128th St. is Olympia Ave. which has been confirmed as an unimproved public street owned by the city of Renton. Along the other side of Olympia Ave. there are now two active machine shops, a carpenter shop and a plumbing contractor shop. All of these operations are perfect neighbors for our op- eration. The area as a whole will benefit greatly due to the development of the improved street, sewer, water and storm drainage facilities as well as professionally landscaped surroundings. There will be no additional noise created by this development and there are no flammable materials used. In our opinion, this use is the logical one for this property. Thank you 1 • Renton Planning Commission �'' . % ', ` O 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 :I ,''n 9 in Dear Sirs, This letter accompanies our request for the grantingof apermit to construct a temporary p q p y parking lot on the site located at the Intersection of Strander Blvd. and West Valley Hwy. The primary reason for the requested lot is to aliviate the problem of traffic conjestion both in our existing lot and the traffic congestion on Strander Blvd. and West Valley Hwy. We are applying for a temporary permit because suitable land for the lot is available only on a month to month basis from the landlord, as they are planning future development of the site. Because of the temporary nature of the lot we are requesting q g permission to use crushed rock as the surfacing material. It is easily applied and removed and will let the water percolate through the soil. This facility will markedly improve the property in that it will provide a graded and even finished surfaced parking area on a site that is at present unkept and unevenly contoured but is used for parking by many people in conjunction with the Longacres Race Track. • 707 • ay,(/(/(/ I • • • Lei • 0 - Dominic J. Colasurdo 15440 S.E. May Valley Rd. Renton, Washington 98055 — March 2, 1981 City of Renton Planning Department • Dear Sirs: . When I recieved permit for land fill I also recieved an approved drainage plan, so -then-I- assumed it was O.K. to proceed-work as planned-.— But, by an error made by the building department and my misunderstanding .we were wrong. I never gave it a thought to leave an open ditch, because there is only about 150° where water can be seen running after a heavy rain. The rest is covered with brush and running in all directions. The water comes from several parkinglots, service stations, a portion of N.E. 4th, and Union Ave. N.E. These waters are polluted with oil because there are no man holes with oil seperation and clean out sumps. There are pictures inclosed showing these conditions. With a well •designed drainage plan, the above situation can be corrected. I have submitted a plan designed by my engineer and approved by the department of public works to take care of this problem on my property and can be continued on adjoining propertys, . Sincerly; c 9 6-611.4-4-1/-L—. Dominic J. Colasurdo , -- 0,6TRI) (- l� U 1�$� BAR E7',11 Nq \ l N71_1:914 / Y1. Y f •. 1 I v i • T - RCH ITECTS C HAR LE S ;M O R G A N & ASSOCIATES 7301 BEVERLY LANE EVERIETT, WA. 98203 Phone (206) 353-2888 March 9, 1981 • Planning Department City of Renton Renton, Washington Re: 30 Unit Apartment Project - "Pine Ridge" Gentlemen: The project as proposed is designed to maintina a natural open vegeta- • tion barrier to the adjacent properties. Having all the units in buildings no larger than 4-plexes, .keeps the project in the character of the area and allows for more open spaces. The project does have' a circular flow of vehicular traffic which makes • easier egress for both occupants and emergency equipment. • The developers will be able to retain a large number of the existing fir trees and will leave a large portion of the natural ground cover. The present R-2 zoning would require each building to have required setbacks on individual sites. This would not lend itself to a freer design which allows us to place buildings to retain trees and better fit the topo- graphy. It would also have a more regimental appearance. Sincerely, LJc' P Charles E. M.• •:n CEM/bjm °i' ✓I • • LICENSED: WASHINGTON . OREGON . IDAHO . UTAH . MONTANA . WYOMING o r '� CITY OF RENTON 0� Rrr'rf / �G.:, APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT r/ (' �, �. Pb G MAR 4 198.1 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY \11r 4:/ ' File No . SP-+O��' Slf Date Rec' d. , - A ' plication Fee Receipt No . E vi ronmen tat Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name nmsiyyto j_ ciiawr rTn Phone 2.5,5- 33 Address ',chid') S_1_ Mt - Valley Road Renton, Washington 98053 2 . Property location Front-ago on Union Ave. N.E. and N.E. 4tli 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) THE NORTH 3/5 OF __!. .1. _ ' . 1 ) .1 !T• Y. " f i i v : i 7,i i I.io i ., • .. YO$C i 614 1 •: d! :;,; UN!. OF SECTION 9 _ TOWNSHTP" 23 inn THE RANG 5 EAST, LM.' IN KING COUNTY, WASHTNf'POM, Y( TTTii' NORTH '�f1 PENT ND TNT+ ES 30 T T R F FOR COUNTY RUAns AND EXCTi T3'T' WE SOUTH 1 AFT QF TTTT+' P,TnT�TH 1� F'+ T OF SATD NORTH' 3 f 5 CO D TO TCIN COTThrTY FOR �_F_ 128th STRAY BY DEED RrQnPTIT:D TINDER AUT)TTOR'S FTTE NO- 5.53(234, ANn EXCEPT THE R0TTTH _ 140 FRET oW THE NORTH 1R2 FEET OF THE EAST 160 FEET 'RE OF THEST 190 FEET OF SAID NORTH 3/5 QF THE WEST HAT,F OF THE NORTHWEST QUTARTER AF THE NORTH3z ER OFT ATn 'tfiTnTT+'SP OUARTER OF SAID SECTION 15. 4 . Number of acres or square feet 82,755 sq- f,\ Present Zoning B - 1 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Undecided at this times 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan ' 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining , Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307. 5 in addition to the above . 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. 1-77 I ITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON /3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ( lo .14P 90 )'FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ' 0-5�� - r ' PA PT'V\�-'' Application fto C50-4. 4- jj Environmental eckl i st No. : --Q .gl ! PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: 0 Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance QDeclaration of Non-Significance a Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. Th'e purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such •a major action. Please answer the following questions as 'completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should • include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your ,total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your .proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. • ENVIRONMENTAL, CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Dominic J. Colasurdo 2. Address and phone number of- Proponent: 1Q440 S.E. May Valley Road Renton, Washington 98055 255-3533 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: • 6. Nature and brief on description of the proposal (including but not limited to its P size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Land fill area about 1351 X. 100' and about b ft. deep and install storm drains. w blp -2- 4 � c 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : 4215!a ron7,4ge, on Union Ave_. N.& is level with road. 1351 frontage on N.F. 1th is about 51 below grade. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : December 1, 1951 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : Land fill permit Storm design. approval 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: Yes — A huildine of some kind will prnhahl3r he built sometime in 19AP 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes , explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- • posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: None • s , II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) • (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or ,in changes in geologic • substructures? X YES , MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief X features? ES MA BE NO (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any X unique geologic.or physical features? YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , X either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or ,erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the X bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MMAYBE NO Explanation: A small portion of said property will be filled, this wi 11 nhange that part of tnpngrtpby. The overaJ 1 slope and run-off will remain the same. _3_ I " (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YES MAYBE NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or X regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of X water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or X the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water X body? YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to X temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE NO (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X ground waters? YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through X interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? • YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, X or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE ' NO (1 ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available X for public water supplies? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any X species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE NO c Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or ( ) in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X species? YES MAYBE NO (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: -4- Y ' (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: (6) Noi'se. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (7) Light and Glare.. Will the proposal produce new light or X glare? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the X present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explana-tion: (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO X (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (10) Risk ofUpset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an - explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including , but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) X in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population X of an area? YET- RUM" Explanation: -5- ,v (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? _ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand X for new parking? YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or X movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES MAYBE , NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , X bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : X (a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NO (b) Police protection? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X YES M-AYBE NO Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new • systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO -6- , .. t (d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBE NO X (f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X YES MAYBE 0 Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of anaesthetically offensive X • site open to public_view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO .__ _ _ Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, ,object or building? _, X YES MMAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that -the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or wijl'ful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: �t"72��i2 �� / 2�� signed) Dominic J. Colasurdo (name printed) City. of Renton Planning Department 5-76 Domiinu J. Colasurdo 15440 S.E. May Valley Rd. Renton, Washington 98055 March 2, 1981 City of Renton Planning Department Dear Sirs: When I recieved permit for land fill I also recieved an approved drainage plan, so then I assumed it was O.K. to proceed work as planned. But, by an error made by the building department and my misunderstanding we were wrong. I never gave it a thought to leave an open ditch, because there is only about 150' where water can be seen running after a heavy rain. The rest is covered with brush and running in all directions. The water comes from several parkinglots, service stations, a portion of N.E. 4th, and Union Ave. N.E. These.-�waters are polluted with oil because there are no man holes with oil seperation and clean out sumps. There are pictures inclosed showing these conditions. With a well designed drainage plan, the above situation can be corrected. I have submitted a plan designed by my engineer and approved by the department of public works to take care of this problem on my property and can be continued on adjoining propertys. (aSincerly; 42>41.714414 -11 Dominic J. Colasurdo cD °- aCI\ !t `'', q�N'NG DE�P� ' . ' 6 i I 1 . 6, o.teiln 1,7..i 1:1 7 a f...lsol„t it til inp . 5 ,„. 12, 4 2,1rzo I I I F---ir— 1 I 1- • ezi C?;; mn sr,ca, es en en G2Z4 ft&I C2 0121:21-Er L22 7a7,-,1 07r117 c6"11 -:l. 11:1_, 4 c Ss 7 (2 0 1 I i 13 I I I II+ --E----H__: ., t_ 0 i 1 t i 1 1 1 ---1 . II-7 t I I i i --::--F-1-- 1 1----- 1 1 1 1 2' . - I / _ . o I, I 1 . - i ..6 —1 ---4---. t . 1 I —1 . ( 1 cl &PSI .0 - • 1 I . e24t d i„.........._ 1 • 1 - ; j . 1 AI 1 _ C it __.A... ..„. • _ i_ I G3 as,444.4, q...3 CLIS7W— , - r - V i 2 1 1 i q T, all i . . f i , DOD I , . 1- 1 i 1 -•.„. 1 I .7o: _ 1-- , -1 - 1 . -ft 11' r /i i _ . i-1 I / I b. , 4 1 , . 1 , . , . ..._ ,-...., , , 1 t ti i . , I I o- AFFIDAVIT 1 , Dominic J. Colasurdo , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 7 day of_lX , 19W , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton Name of Notary Public) (Signature of ner 3 //x c -'�y�- `r� L r 15141.0 S.E May Valley Road (Address) (Address) Renton Washington 98055 (City) (State) 255-3533 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing V sc11application . Date Received ` cg ,9 By: T APR 4 981 -7� ,�`�~ Renton Planning Dept . 'G D - ' 2-73 Ni ENDING' OF FILE FILE TITLE I M , 4/1 / 6, i( j42721,k) SPI-02 .1_ I ''