No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 1• 15 e-I <( ro C .g "' C i;; E ® "' E 8 {E S 176TH ST "' E "' "' ({) D • Revised 12-08 ~0,. SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER OOUBLETREE- SUITES BAKER BLVD MINKLER BLVD Boeing CUSID11iet Eqieueace Center(CEC) 4/-13410?0SW3'llhS1 Boeing Elecil"OIICS Ce'*I 1-101 616SW!'S!St 8Geing traployen Ciedit un· 12770 G.itew~y D• f0f1 Denlll 1-68 6&lOFo,tGfn;W,1y 611Nay Corpente ~llln /-33 1 -4/ o, ere,; Put 2~01 1301 SW '6ll1St 25-02 1JOOSWl6t11St 25-03 130'2 SW 16!11 S: Riller1eth Corpora1e Center 7-244 500Nacr:esAw.SW ~a-Tac Tower II 7-181 179JOPac1l1cH,lhWayS TrlblR To111ers 7 206 Two 100 H~nto~ V1llagr P: -201 Thm 10? S Grady W]~ Cuslomer Ser.rices Spares OislriNlion Cenler 22--01 :?201 S 142,,U SI :?2-50 2206 S 146m St 22-51 Guard Got~ 25 10 1900 Oakesdale A'le SW 25-20 1901 Oakesddl~AveSW Longacres Park SW27TH ST 41-'34 Boeing CEC =-I I I I --SW34TH ST e SW39TH ST D Boeing property 0 Helistop Copyrigr.t 2007., The Boeing Company. All nghls reserved • CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: December 2, 2009 To: City Clerk's Office From: City Of Renton Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. "'"'"""'"'.£' ' l Project Name: Longacres Tree Removal I j_L_U_A_(f_i_le_)_N_u_m_b_e_r_: _____ LU_A_-_0_9_-1_4_9_,_R_V_M_P _________________ j f Cross-References: & I_A_K_A_'s_:------------------------------1 : Project Manager: Vanessa Dolbee tt j_A_c_c_e_p-ta_n_c_e_D_a-te_: ______ N-ov_e_m_b_e_r_1_7_,_2_0_0_9 _________________ ,j ,-------------------------------------{! ! Applicant: Boeing Corporation j j Owner: Same as applicant 1 ! Contact: Mark Clement -Boeing Corporation j I PID Number: 0886700220, 2423049022, 2423049071 I ERC Decision Date: I ERC Appeal Date: j Administrative Approval: I Appeal Period Ends: ) j Public Hearing Date: I Date Appealed to HEX: 1 By Whom: 1 HEX Decision· Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Mylar Recording Number: November 17, 2009 December 1, 2009 Date· Date: Project Description: The applicant is requesting to remove approximately 46, caliper, Red Alders and approximately 8, 6-inch caliper, Leyland Cypress from Longacres property. The tree removal would be located on parcel numbers 2423049022, and 2423049071. Location: Along SW 16'" Street at Boeing Longacres Comments: I l 10 -12-inch I 1 I ' the Boeing 0886700220,' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION of ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMIT EVALUATION FORM & DECISION DATE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE: LAND USE ACTION FILE NO.: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT MANAGER: OWNER/ APPLICANT: CONTACT (if other than Owner): PROJECT LOCATION: PARCEL ID NUMBER: DATE OF EXPIRATION: November 17, 2009 LUA09-149, RVMP Longacres Tree Removal Vanessa Dolbee, (Acting) Senior Planner Boeing Corporation, 1901 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055 Mark Clement, Boeing, 737 Logan Ave. N., Renton, WA 98055 Removal of trees along SW 16'h Street at Boeing Longacres 0886700220 / 2423049022 / 2423049071 November 17, 2010 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting to remove approximately forty- six, 10 -12-inch caliper, Red alders and approximately eight, 6-inch caliper, Leyland cypress from the Boeing Longacres property. The tree removal would be located on parcel numbers 0886700220, 2423049022, and 2423049071. The trees that are proposed to be removed are located along SW 16th Street and have been damaged. An Arboricultural Report, prepared by Arborea Consultants, LLC, was provided by the applicant. This report indicates there is a risk of tree failure due to root loss. Additionally, tree failure is most likely to occur during periods of heavy rain and high wind. This may coincide with conditions that would cause flooding. Failed trees may require clearing before flood defenses could be put in place around Boeing's 25-01 building resulting in an increase in hazard risk. The eight Leyland cypress that would be removed are proposed to be replaced with eleven, 8-foot tall, Blue Lawson cypress. The 46 Red alders that would be removed are proposed to be replaced with forty-six, 6-7 foot tall, Western Larch trees. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION City of . - ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMIT EVALUATION FORM & DECISION DATE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE: LAND USE ACTION FILE NO.: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT MANAGER: OWNER/APPLICANT: CONTACT (if other than Owner): PROJECT LOCATION: PARCEL ID NUMBER: DATE OF EXPIRATION: November 17, 2009 LUA09-149, RVMP Longacres Tree Removal Vanessa Dolbee, (Acting) Senior Planner Boeing Corporation, 1901 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055 Mark Clement, Boeing, 737 Logan Ave. N., Renton, WA 98055 Removal oftrees along SW 161 h Street at Boeing Longacres 0886700220 / 2423049022 / 2423049071 November 17, 2010 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting to remove approximately forty- six, 10-12-inch caliper, Red alders and approximately eight, 6-inch caliper, Leyland cypress from the Boeing Longacres property. The tree removal would be located on parcel numbers 0886700220, 2423049022, and 2423049071. The trees that are proposed to be removed are located along SW 16th Street and have been damaged. An Arboricultural Report, prepared by Arborea Consultants, LLC, was provided by the applicant. This report indicates there is a risk of tree failure due to root loss. Additionally, tree failure is most likely to occur during periods of heavy rain and high wind. This may coincide with conditions that would cause flooding. Failed trees may require clearing before flood defenses could be put in place around Boeing's 25-01 building resulting in an increase in hazard risk. The eight Leyland cypress that would be removed are proposed to be replaced with eleven, 8-foot tall, Blue Lawson cypress. The 46 Red alders that would be removed are proposed to be replaced with forty-six, 6-7 foot tall, Western Larch trees. City of Renton Community and Ee Longacres Tree Removal ,ic Development Deportment ine Vegetation Management Permit LUA09-149, RVMP DA TE OF PERMIT: November 17, 2009 Page 2 of 4 GENERAL REVIEW CRITERIA (4-4-130H4): Yes No N/A ~ D D ~ D D D D ~ ~ D D D D ~ ~ D D D D ~ a. The land clearing and tree removal will not create or contribute to landslides, accelerated soil creep, settlement and subsidence or hazards associated with strong ground motion and soil liquefaction. [See Decision Criteria for additional comments.] b. The land clearing and tree removal will not create or contribute to flooding, erosion, or increased turbidity, siltation or other form of pollution in a watercourse. [See Decision Criteria for additional comments.] c. Will the land clearing and tree removal be conducted to maintain or provide visual screening and buffering between land uses of differing intensity and consistent with applicable landscaping and setback provisions of the Renton Municipal Code? d. Can the land clearing and tree removal be conducted in a way so as to expose the smallest practical area of soil to erosion for the least possible time, consistent with an approved build-out schedule and including any necessary erosion control measures? e. Land clearing and tree removal shall be consistent with subsection D2 of this Section, Restrictions for Critical Areas -General, and RMC 4-3- 050 -Critical Areas Regulations. [See Decision Criteria for additional comments.] f. The retained trees will not create or contribute to hazardous conditions as the result of blow-down, insect or pest infestation, disease, or other problems that may be created as a result of selectively removing trees and other vegetation from the lot(s). [See Decision Criteria for additional comments.] g. Will the land clearing and tree removal being conducted maximize the preservation of any tree(s) in good health that is an outstanding specimen because of its size, form, shape, age, color, rarity, or other distinction as a community landmark? DECISION CRITERIA COMMENTS: [the bullet number below corresponds to the Decision Criteria number above] a. While the subject site is located within an identified Seismic Hazard Area, the proposal does not appear to contribute to hazards associated with strong ground motion and soil liquefaction. City of Renton Community and Ee 1ic Development Department ine Vegetation Management Permit Langacres Tree Removal LUA09-149, RVMP DATE OF PERMIT: November 17, 2009 Page 3 of 4 b. The subject site is located within an identified Flood Hazard Area, and is within the area at risk of further flooding because of the structural instability of the Howard Hanson Dam. The removal of the damaged trees within this area would reduce further hazard risk from tree failure, to the subject site and adjacent public right-of-way. It is not anticipated that the removal of the subject trees would contribute to flooding. Approximately 105 feet east of the eastern edge ofthe work area is the Springbrook Creek. All work would be beyond the City's largest buffer requirement of 100-feet. Although, there is a potential for some erosion and runoff to occur during removal and planting of the trees. As such, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant utilize best management practices for erosion control to minimize sediment runoff entering Springbrook Creek. c. Not applicable d. (see discussion under criterion b. above) e. Not applicable f. The trees proposed for removal have been damaged and are at risk of failure; as such, the new trees proposed to replace the damaged trees would be less susceptible to blow-down than the existing trees. g. Not applicable DECISION: The Longacres Tree Removal Routine Vegetation Management Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall be required to utilize best management practices for erosion control to minimize sediment runoff entering Springbrook Creek. 2. If work is to be conducted within the public right-of-way, then a right-of-way use permit shall be obtained from the City. C:Z J ~ ·~ C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Planning Director Planning Division Date 1 APPEALS: Appeals of permit issuance must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required fee to the City of Renton Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, {425) 430-6510. City of Renton Community and Ee 1ic Development Department me Vegetation Management Permit WA09-149, RVMP Longacres Tree Removal DATE OF PERMIT: November 17, 2009 Page 4 af 4 EXPIRATION: The Routine Vegetation Management Permit shall be valid for one year from the date of issuance. An extension may be granted by the Planning Division for a period of one year upon application by the property owner or manager. Application for such an extension must be made at least thirty (30) days in advance of the expiration of the original permit and shall include a statement of justification for the extension. Attachments: 1) Aerial photo of subject area 2) Addendum to "Arboricultural Report: Tree Impact Assessment Boeing Longacres Flood Protection" prepared by Arborea Consultants, LLC, dated October, 2009. 3) Vicinity Map Renton City Lim~ Parcels ~ Renton Aerial 200 i ' Renton SCALE 1 : 3,268 0 200 400 f-EET 600 http:// re nton net o rg/MapG u id e/ maps/Pa reel. mwf ';'' "i ------- N /~ Monday, November 16, 2009 0513 PM • Bruce Dees & Associates LLC Attn: Brian D. Patnode Gill Project Manager 222 East 26tti Street, No. 202, Tacoma, WA 98421 Date 1on109 ARB REA CONSULTANTS, LLC TREE AND WOODLAND PRESERVATION Addendum to "ARBORICULTURAL REPORT: TREE IMPACT ASSESSMENT BOEING LONGACRES FLOOD PROTECTION", October 2009 Site Meeting, rt' September 2009 Dear Brian, Gity of Renton Plcinning Division At your request this letter has been prepared to clarify and summarize the findings of todays site meeting. During the meeting we discussed tree removal for a single row of red alder (A/nus rubra) and tree protection requirements for a single black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) following the repositioning of the flood protection barrier. We also briefly discussed the transplant of 3 cedar trees. The site meeting occurred on Wednesday 7tti October 2009. Transplanting Three cedars (Thuja sp.,) are scheduled to be transplanted on Saturday 1 Qth October 2009. This Is to be completed by Big Trees, Inc. (http.J/www biqtrees11pply com/index pbp,l. Arborea Consultants (AC) contacted Big Trees, Inc., 7'tt1 September 2009 by telephone to confirm the method to. pe used and equipment involved. Information on the methods to be used are summarized by Big Trees, Inc., on the following url: http· 1/www bigtreesupply com/index php?page-Transplanting+%?6+Besc11A&s11h=Iransplanting The 3 trees are to be hand excavated to create a root ball. This is will then be wrapped in burlap material and secured using a rope webbing over the ball and burlap. The r~lvlng holes and position, to be detailed by your firm, are also hand excavated by Big Trees, Inc. The trees are to be moved from the transplant position to the receiving holes by a four tine 8,000 lb material handler. Prior to transplant the trees are to be treated by both an antldesiccant and an antltranspirant (products 'Moisture In' and 'Root Zone'). This is applied to minimize the transplant shock in the trees. The affects of these largely hormone based products should last for a 3 week period. More information can be found at the following url: http·//www bigtrees11pply com/index pbp?page-Helpbll%20Articles&id-172 Flood Protection Barrier Repositioning The repositioning of the flood protection barrier should not affect the trees near to the new alignment provided tree protection measures detailed in AC report 'ARBORICULTURAL REPORT: TREE IMPACT ASSESSMENT BOIENG LONGACRES FLOOD PROTECTION' are followed. These are the same methods discussed in our site meeting on 30th September 2009. See section Vlb. Tree Protection Sepcification and Measures, page 9 through 11. ARBOREA CONSULTANTS, LLC Post Office Box 29917, Bellingham. Washington 98228-1917 / _arborea.consult@mac.com .J...360 733 97QQ ATTACHMENT 2 8'.u\E Dees rn1d _.'1.ssociates· Boeirg L'.Jng:=icres Flood Pro1ecfrJfi The repositioned flood protection barrier affects a length of barrier to the southeast of building 25-01 adjacent to a covered pedestrian walkway. Figure 1 shows the position of a single black cottonwood that you were concerned about in terms of damage; red circle. 25-01 ,. -TlE 1,,1, v ;c;_;r,;. (SIT ( / f,. · , ,·rn,,J LPl"LI'~~' i: "·· 1 !J Figure 1: Plan view showing the position of a single black cottonwood and alignment of the flood protection barrier. The black cottonwood is indicated within the red circle and the barrier by the green line on the plan AC recommends the positioning of the outer edge of the barrier units or 'water side' to be 5 feet from the face of the trunk (north} of the black cottonwood. The concern is that positioning the barrier closer will require removal of a primary branch leaving a large trunk injury that would lead to decay. SW 16"' Street Red Alder Stability AC reported its concerns and observations for the row of red alder affected by banier installation in-front of building 25-01 during the site visit 30th September 2009 and In the report 'ARBORICULTURJ.\L REPORT: TREE IMPACT ASSESSMENT BOIENG LONGACRES FLOOD PROTECTION'. An extract of the report concerning all similar affected trees is provided below ('Tree Instability and Survivability' page 19) "~ Red alder is known to be sensitive to root damage and root loss. As a result the trenching may have a detrimental affect on the species. Monitoring during and after the project is completed is recommended. Trenching may cause instability in the trees affected by trenching i.e. Red alder, western red cedar. The pruning AR BO REA CONSULTANTS, LLC P.O. Box 29917, Bellingham, WA 98228 360.733.9799 email: arborea coosutt@mac com • i ,1\ ARB,REA u"recommended is intended to mitigate for this root loss. However it should be recognized that the risk of entire failure is increased as result of root Joss and despite the pruning treatments prescribed."" "" Affected trees should be monitored therefore not only for changes in condition but any compromise in their stability due to root loss. It is recommended that Boeing use a qualified professional to complete this monitoring. The critical period for monitoring is during October through February and following high wind events. ""It may be necessary to consider the removal and replacement of trees affected. Further details can be provided on request(.)"" AC agrees with the owners decision to remove this row of affected trees. As indicated above crown reduction pruning treatments recommended would reduce the risk but not entirely control this risk of tree failure. Tree failure is most likely to occur during periods of heavy rain and high wind. This may coincide with conditions that would cause flooding. Failed trees may require clearing before flood defenses could be put in place. In addition failure may damage the flood defenses should failure occur. The prescribed pruning detailed in AC report is intended to reduce the risk of tree failure only. Pruning cannot absolutely control the risk of tree failure. The pruning prescribed is arboricultural best practice in this situation where the this form of root severance has occurred and where the owners intention is to retain the trees. If you have questions I hope you will let me know. My contact details are provided below. Sincerely yours, Mr. Paul Hans Thompson ISA Certified Arborist, PN-1838A STEC HND -Forestry Quantified Tree Risk Assessment (QTRA); Registered Licensee No.1586 PNW-ISA Certified Tree Risk Assessor: No.249 Member American Society of Consulting Arborist's Member International Society of Arboriculture Member Society of Commercial Arboriculture cc: Dennis L. Ronholt, Construction Administrator Boeing Corporation, ARBOR EA CONSULTANTS, LLC P.O. Box 29917, Bellingham, WA 98228 360.733.9799 email: arborea consutt@mac com Bruce Dees & Associates: Boeing Longacres Flood Protection 7 IV. Results of Inspection and Tree Protection Specification The following section provides details on the steps required to protect the trees during flood protection installation works. IVa. Tree Removal The first area requiring tre€ removal is within an linear planting of Lawson cypress surrounding and screening the electrical substation on site. The electrical substation situated west of building 25-03. This is shown in figure 4, below. Figure 4: Electrical substation AC noted approximately four trees had partially failed during its 30111 September 2009 site visit. The laryest of the trees is estimated to be 10 inches diameter. The position of these trees are shown in figure 1, within the red circle. Removal of these trees is a priority given their position relative to the electrical substation. AA occupation risk assessment is recommended prior to completing tree removal works. Given the proximity of the trees to the electrical substation a certified tree utility specialist contractor may be required to remove the trees. 2. Removal of a red alder at the central main entrance lnto the car parking area for building 25-01 off SW 16th Street, opposite entrance to building 25-03 and 25-02. The position of this tree is illustrated in figure 5 below. + ''@.r.,·· .-,..._,_, · ... ' • .. " Figure 5: ARBOR EA CONSULTANTS, LLC P.O. Box 29917, Bellingham, WA 98228 360.733.9799 email: arborea.consult@rnac.com \ t 1s .g- <( "' C .g "' E "' 1' "' E 0 0 >"' "' ~ "' CJ) Washingtun -Southcenter/ 1 ukwila ;Afe01,~ni:(.,p I ® S FfiTf-'Sl D ·.f.· i 57. D0U'3LETREE IN·"l • OOUBi...ETHE::!:: SUITES t,t,t~KLER ElLVD C f ii C "' 5 t_,----1i 58 t aoerng Cuslamer Ex~e11en[e Cenler(CEC) i!J 'lJ.'[, ~,•, (!T \ Soeing Ele,11on1cs Cenler ;.;~-5'5S\'/41o:St Boe,ng Em~loyees C,e~,t Um '2 ·.:uG-,., .. ,, D Cuslomer Sirvu:es Spms D1slribulion ~n!er !? :-, z-2::,· s, :2-·~ s· ?! 50 ~2,:,~ S '"6"'; 5· n!:1 r:,..1,.-:1;,.-.- Fon Deni 11 :-ci3 ,1;31·, '· · ),c··,;-.--, Gateway Corporal~ Cenl~r ,'-3:, 12~-~,,. -, l_lr longacres Perk h-01 'Jl1' '.,'N!·,irs.)· 25-1]2 :Joo s,v ;,Ju· s: ~5-03 '302 SW ·,,j•:· S• :>:i ·o l~:)(l();;Hd;>~,c 5-.'./ ·~"!'0Jk";Mc W 16TH S< \\ 2"5-10 Boeing Family Center Longacres Park SW 27TH ST 1;.;3,; Boeing CEC =- 0 I I I I --SW 34Trl Sf ' m w " 0 z 0 ,-... L-lil Rf,P.rte&h Co,poiate Center .,;_: :,:lfl '.:.i:"---· , ~v· Seo-Tac T~wer II -i" .-,,-,,1 a, ''· S Trilcn Tow~rs ;· 206 :_..'J ;~lj .'!-, · • :-.0 u: Jn;,.; 7Q:" ', G•,;·l @ D Boeing property © Helistop J 60 J.\ TTACHfVIENT 3 57 A C .E F • City of Renton l,; n:. Y' V I I • ~ ..... .,., --' • Pian11iri·:_~ Q\i\Si(W· LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION [f{lt~tCtt]\Yll~[l1 PROPERTY OWNER($) TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 206 617- 2944 NAME: Boeing Corp. Mark.d.clement@boeina.com ADDRESS: 1901 Oakesdale Ave SW PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Remove trees along CITY: Renton ZIP: 16" ave Boeing Longacres site. Replace with new trees 98055 PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206 617-2944) 1901 Oakesdale Ave Sw APPLICANT (if other than owner) KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): NAME: Mark Clement 0886700220 COMPANY (if applicable): Boeing EXISTING LAND USE(S): Commercial office ADDRESS: 737 Logan Ave n. PROPOSED LAND USE(S) Commercial office CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: TELEPHONE NUMBER 206 617-2944 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): NA CONTACT PERSON EXISTING ZONING manf. NAME: Mark Clement PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): same as existing COMPANY (if applicable): Boeing Co. SITE AREA (in square feet): 153.8 ACRES SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE ADDRESS: 737 Logan Ave n. DEDICATED:none SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): NA Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/planning/mastcrapp.doc 11/05/09 PR ECT INFORMATION contir . ·d .. NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): NA NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): NA NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NA PROJECT VALUE: 1,1 million IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA D FLOOD HAZARD AREA NA __ sq.ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL D GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA D HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if D WETLANDS sq. ft. applicable): NA LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach leaal descriotion on senarate sheet with the followina information included) SITUATE IN THE --QUARTER OF SECTION.:=. TOWNSHIP _n_, RANGE_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. __ x_Routine Vegation 3. - management Permit_ 4. 2. - Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ Billed_ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP (Signature of Owner/Representative) Notary .Public in and for the State of Washington ·-----..i (Signature of Owner/Representative) Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/planning/masterapp.doc 2 11/05/09 0 C ft 0 ,.,... f 7PAIIDn IH•NUNJ ...... .1111,.2011 Q:web/pw/devserv/forrns/planning/masterapp.doc )JECT INFORMAT;ON(co;tinu, Notary (Print) l l QJ() ( / fJ. My appointment expires:_-J~· _u"-'-'i'---:1-'-·~-~~·_,_) _d_O.._._// 3 11105/09 PLANNING DIVISION -· · .. ,,'( p.er1tOfl WAIVE:.n. OF SUBMITTAL REQUIRt:MENTSv,:~;n~nG 0·1·,s\nT' FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS . LANO use PERM1TsueM1tiAI.. ·. ·•·•••·•••····• ·•~iqG1Re:M~Nts:···••••••••·• Calculations 1 ¢p19r~~ r0~p$ !Pf 9isp1~~ 4 •• •·• ··• • Density Worksheet 4 ¢r~ih~g~ ¢pr#/qipi~Ot > ·· · Drainage Report 2 •~ief ~iiqni.•Ar~h I\El<lHfr~i·j 11Nb ;. • Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 F1q8~ H~~~r~ bater · Floor Plans 3 AND• Habitat Data Report 4 1mpr\lv~rn~Ht p~f Eirra1 •; • ·• · • • · Legal Description 4 M~~•bt Exi~tin\i site q:qntji/iorli.{'·•••• Master Application Form 4 r,,1p~µrnerltC~rtjs(qne pef rnohurnent).1) •··•··•·. Neighborhood Detail Map 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building 4. Planning WAIVED . r ~,,<: . --.: vu;] PROJECT NAME: _W_'.,,_V\_Pf!-=U_l?_S~_ I ,V_t'~~~~~~- DATE: ll/Cf/04 H · \CED\Data\F orms-T emplates\S elf-Help Handouts\Plan ni ng\waiverofsubmittalreqs .xis 06/09 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER uF SUBMITTAL REQUIRE: ... ENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND uss ti~~MiT sqat>il1tr~·•••·••••••·••·••·· ) REQI.IIR.~M!:NTSi > ..... . Plat Name Reservation 4 Traffic Study 2 irie ¢ll\p@/L,itj8§1¢~/iri~ i->1~p\••••••••·•••••·•·••-·•· .· Urban Design Regulations Analysis 4 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4 w~t1~iiiii•M11,gat1~ri Pie ii: Preiimi~ari :•••·••••••••···•···· ··· · Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations 2 AND 3 WAivsb • i ijy(H This requirement may be waived by: 1 . Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building PROJECT NAME: lCMAOOES iVte (emoJd DATE:_(-+-/ /_aq~/o;;._Jq'--------- 4. Planning H :ICEDID ata\Forms-T emplates\Self-Help Handouts\Pla nni ng\waiverofsubmittalreqs.xls 06/09 BRUCE DEES& ASSOCIATES IH Lc111Jscap,:; A'C:-t1tectJ<e • Urben Design Site Planning• Recreat10:1 fctc1l1!ics Des1g·1 November 6, 2009 Mr. Mark Clement The Boeing Company PO Box 3707, MC 1 W-09 Seattle, WA 98124 Job No.: 005-59-01 City of Renton Planninr.; Division RE: Boeing -LAP Flood Protection Routine Vegetation Management Permit Narrative The size of the property is 153.8 Acres. The current use of the site is office and engineering support for the Boeing Commercial Airlines. There is no near term development planned at the proposed site. The site is currently fully developed. The vegetation to be removed includes 47 Red Alders approximately 10" -12" in diameter in addition to approximately 80 Leyland Cypress that are 6" in diameter. The proposed vegetation removal area is flat. No work will be conducted in a Native Growth Protection Easement. The area is flat as noted above. There is no landslide potential. Approximately 20 yards of topsoil will be used to backfill the voids created from stump grinding. Any exposed soil will be covered with 2" of mulch and or seed. A boom truck, excavator, chipper and stump grinder may be used to remove the trees. No pesticides or herbicides will be used. Measures to protect the site from potential adverse impacts of the proposed work and equipment operation are standard notice plan lo office holders and construction barricades. The time schedule for starting and completing the work is 6 am to 4 pm November 10, 2009 through November 24, 2009. Sincerely, Brian !node, Project Manager Enclosure 222 Easi 26th Streci, No. 202, Tacoma. WA 98421 (253) 627-7947 FAX (253) t..?7-6661 Web Site: wvvw bdassoc1a'.es cocr Bruce Dlc'':'S a:10 t\ssoc,c,1es. Boeing L.ongacres Flood Protection Bruce Dees & Associates LLC Attn: Brian D. Patnode Gill Project Manager 222 East 26"> Street, No. 202, Tacoma, WA 98421 Dato 10/7 /09 ARB-REA CONSULTANTS, LLC TREE AND WOODLAND PRESERVATION Addendum to "ARBORICULTURAL REPOR'I! TREE IMPACT ASSESSMENT BOEING LONGACRES FLOOD PROTECTION", October 2009 Site M-ng, 7"' September 2009 Dear Brian, At your request this letter has been prepared to clerify and summarize the findings of todays site meeting. During the meeting we discussed tree removal for a single row of red alder (A/nus rubra) and tree protection requirements for a single black cottonwood (Popu/us lrichoca,pa) following the repositioning of the flood protection barrier. We also bliofly discussed the transplant of 3 cedar trees. The site meeting occurred on Wednesday 7th October 2009. Tranaplantlng Throe cedars [Thu/asp.,) are scheduled to be transplanted on Saturday 10~ October 2009. This ls to be completed by Big Trees, Inc. 0,ttp·/Jwww bigtrnesupply:com/jndex php). Arborea Consultants (AC) contacted Big Trees, Inc., 7th September 2009 by telephone to confirm the method to be used and equipment involved. Information on the methods to be used are summarized by Big Trees, Inc., on the following uri: http·//www biqtreesuooivcom/index php?pageJransplanting+%26+Besrn1e&sub:.Traosplanting The 3 trees are to be hand excavated to create a root ball. This Is will then be wrapped in burlap material and secured using a rope webbing over the ball and burlap. The receiving holes and position, to be detailed by your firm, are also hand excavated by Big Trees, Inc. The trees are to be moved from the transplant position to the raoetving holes by a four tine 8,000 lb material handler. Prior to transplant the trees are to be treated by both an antldeslccant and an antttransplrant (products 'Moisture In' and 'Root Zone1. This Is applied to minimize the transplant shock in the trees. The affects of these largely hormooe based products should last for a 3 week period. More lnfolTllB.tion can be found at the following url: http·//www bigtl'.ftflSLiPPhtcomtindex pbp?pagft:Helpfl.Jl%20Articlffl&id-J72 Flood Protection Barrier Repoelllonlng The repositioning of the flood protection barrier should not affect the trees near to the new alignment provided tree protection measures detailed in AC report 'ARBORICULTURAL REPORT: TREE IMPACT ASSESSMENT BOIENG LONGACRES FLOOD PROTECTION' are followed. These are the same methods discussed in our site meeting on 3Qlh September 2009. See section Vlb. Troe Protection Sepclfication and Measures, page 9 through 11. ARBOREA CONSULTANTS, LLC Post Office Box 299'!7, Bellingham, Washington 98228-1917 / _arborea.consult@mac.com _L.___360 733 9799 The repos~ioned flood protection barrier affects a length of barrier to the southeast of building 25-01 adjacent to a covered pedestrian walkway. Figure 1 shows the position of a slngle black cottonwood that you were concerned about In terms of damage; l'9d circle. 25-01 c.~ '), ,;!till.~-· 1,-· .• w1.· <'I/Ml" -(. 1 :,, ,--,~·,)ti~-, ,, : -· 11,1 ,, ,1.1 ,_1 D 11{ Kv '.-0,:C• , 1$Cf r •• c.'I I. " r,:: ,•,1, :,1 ! ,-, I -·l I li 11,,1,,J, .. ,,,I-,, f---..·-· ~1 __ _ _ _ _ J J_I 1 - IJ-., \\. I. \~ ,. ~ ..,,--.. ,v \ I \ 't ,111 Figure 1: Plan view showing the position of a single black cottonwood and alignment of the flood protection banier. The black cottonwood is Indicated within the red circle and the barrier by the green line on the plan AC recommends the positioning of the outer edge of the barrier units or 'water stde' to be 5 feet from the face of the trunk (north) of the black cottonwood. The concern is that positioning the barrier closer will require removal of a primary branch leaving a large trunk injury that would lead to decay. SW 111"' Slr8et Red Alder Stablllty AC reported its concerns and observations for the row of red alder affected by barrier installation in-front of building 25-01 during the s~ visit 30" September 2009 and in the n,port 'ARBORICULTURAL REPORT: TREE IMPACT ASSESSMENT BOIE NG LONGACRES FLOOD PROTECTION'. An extract of the report concerning all similar affected trees is provided below ('Tree Instability and SuNlvablllty' page 19) "" Red alder is known to be sensitive to root damage and root loss. As a result the trenching may have a detrimental affect on the species. Monrtoring during and after the project is completed is recommended. Trenching may cause instability in the trees affected by trenching I.e. Red alder, western red cedar. The pruning ARBOR EA CONSULTANTS, LLC P.O. Box29917, Bellingham, WA 98228 360.733.9799 email: arborea cons1,1t@mac com Bt JGC [_:ees and ,l'i.ssociatr:s: Boeiny l.onqacres F-iood Protectioci ""recommended is intended to mitigate for this root loss. However it should be recognized that the risk of entire failure is increased as result of root loss and despite the pruning treatments prescribed."" .. "Affected trees should be monitored therefore not only for changes in condition but any compromise in their stability due to root loss. It Is recommended that Boeing use a qualified professional to complete this monitoring. The critical period for monitoring is during October through February and following high wind events . .. "It may be necessary to consider the removal and replacement of trees affected. Further details can be provided on request(.)"" AC agrees with the owners decision to remove this row of affected trees. As indicated above crown reduction pruning treatments recommended would reduce the risk but not entirely control this risk of tree failure. Tree failure Is most likely to occur during periods of heavy rain and high wind. This may coincide with conditions that would cause flooding. Failed trees may require clearing before flood defenses could be put in place. In addition failure may damage the flood defenses should failure occur. The prescribed pruning detailed in AC report is intended to reduce the risk of tree failure only. Pruning cannot absolutely control the risk of tree failure. The pruning prescribed is arboricultural best practice in this situation where the this form of root severance has occurred and where the owners intention is to retain the trees. If you have questions I hope you will let me know. My contact details are provided below. Sincerely yours, Mr. Paul Hans Thompson ISA Certified Arborist, PN-1838A BTEC HND -Forestry Quantified Tn,e Risk Assessment (QlRA); Registered Licensee No. 1586 PNW-ISA Certified Tree Risk Assessor. No.249 Member American Society of Consulting Arborlst's Member International Society of Arboriculture Member Society of Commercial Arborlculture cc: Dennis L. Ronholt, Construction Administrator Boeing Corporation, AR BO REA co N s u LT ANTS, LLC P.O. Box 29917, Bellingham, WA 98228 360. 733.9799 email: arhorea COOSlllt@mac com • • Bruce Dees & Associates: Boeing Longacres Flood Protection 7 IV. Results of Inspection and Tree Protection Specification The following section provides details on the steps required to protect the trees during flood protection installation works. IVa. Tree Removal 1. The first area requiring tree removal is within an Hnear planting of Lawson cypress surrounding and screening the electrical substation on site. The electrical substation situated west of building 25--03. This is shown in figure 4, below. Figure 4: Electrical substation AC noted approximately four trees had partially falled during Its 30th September 2009 site visit. The largest of the trees Is estimated to be 1 O Inches diameter. The position of these trees are shown In figure 1, within the red circle. Removal of these trees Is a priority given their position relative to the electrical substation. An occupation risk assessment is recommended prior to completing tree removal works. Given the proximity of the trees to the electrical substation a certified tree utility specialist contractor may be required to remove the trees. 2. Removal of a red alder at the central main entrance into the car parking area for building 25-01 off SW 161h Street, opposite entrance to bulldlng 25-03 and 25-02. The position of this tree is illustrated in figure 5 below. + ·o • • " Figure 5: Red alder, single tree removal Indicated wttt, red cln:le In drawing ARBOR EA CONSULTANTS, LLC P.O. Box 29917, Bellingham, WA 98228 360.733.9799 emell: arborea.consult@rnac.com Boeing Building 25-01 HESCO FL.c Wall Installation Nowmber 6. 2009 Bid Set SECTION 02930 -PLANTING PART 1 -GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. This Section includes: 1. Installing plant material as shown on the Drawings. 2. Installing fertilizer and mulch. 3. Performing maintenance. I .2 REFERENCES A. Refer to the following standards: Planting Section 02930 City ot Renton P/~nninq 01 1Jisiori 1. WSDA Washington State Department of Agriculture -Rules Relating to Standards for Nursery Stock. 2. American Standard for Nursery Stock, ANSI 260.1-1990. 3. Hortus Third, Cornell University. 1.3 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION A. Materials, equipment, and labor for planting; reestahlishing finish grading of planting areas following planting; protection and immediate maintenance; guarantee and replacement; and related items necessary to complete the work indicated. B. Quantities: Determine exact amounts from Drawings. 1. Import topsoil. 14 SUBMITT ALS A. Submit the following: I. Product Data: a. Mulch 2. Submit Maintenance Data. Include special directions essential for Owner's maintenance program during guarantee/warranty period. Include duplicate copies for landscaping maintenance personnel use during maintenance period. 3. PLANTl1'G Warrantces: 02930 -I ( Broce Dees & ,1.1S0cwro 2009 Roeing Bu,ldmg 25-01 IIESCO Flovv .Vall lnstalla!Jon Planting Section 02930 l\ovember 6. 2009 Bid Set 4. Plant Material Warranty: Written Warranty on Contractor's letterhead. 5. Samples: a. Mulch -1 cubic foot. b. Topsoil -1 cubic foot. 1.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Supplier, installer qualifications: Contractor to have at least five years experience performing comparable work. B. Pre-Installation Meeting: 1. All plants shall be reviewed by the Owner's Representative on site prior to planting. 2. Stake all locations for approval prior to excavating pits. 1.6 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING A. Products Excluding Plant Materials: 1. Labeling: Furnish standard products in unopened manufacturer's standard containers bearing original labels showing quantity, analysis and name of manufacturer. 2. Storage: Store materials and products with protection from weather or other conditions which would damage or impair their effectiveness. B. Acceptance of Contractor-Procured Plant Materials: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. PLANTJ'-;G Owner acceptance of Plant Materials at Delivery: Owner's Representative to review plant materials upon delivery to verify that plants are undamaged, healthy and satisfactory for which to provide the Warranty requirements described in these Specifications. Unsatisfactory Conditions: Contractor to notify Owner's Representative immediately if unsatisfactory conditions are found that will not allow the plants to be warranted as described in these Specifications. Acceptance of Warranty Responsibility: The Contractor, by accepting delivery of plant material, without providing written notification of unsatisfactory conditions, assumes Warranty responsibilities for the plant material as described in these specifications. Unloading: The Contractor has responsibility for removing plant material from delivery vehicle. Protection Prior to Installation: Protect from sun and drying winds from delivery until planted in final location on site. Heel-in all rootballs if not planted the same day as delivered. 02930 -2 ( Bnn·t D!!l!S & As1U1.Wl!!S 200'1 Boeing Building 25-01 HESCO Floou .Vall Installation No\·ember 6. 2009 Bid Set Planting Section 02930 6. Proper Plant Handling: Handle and protect plants, roots, rootballs, and new buds to prevent plant injuries. Pickup all plants from the rootball or container, not the trunk. 7. Unsatisfactory Materials: Immediately remove unsatisfactory materials from site. 8. Verification of Species: All plant material shall be delivered with tags or labels identifying species and variety (as applicable). Incorrect species shall be removed from the site immediately. 9. Plant Tags: Do not remove yellow, plastic lock-seal tags with serial numbers until end of Warranty period. 1.7 PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS A. Environmental Requirements: Plant during periods normal for optimum grow1h, as determined by season, weather conditions, and accepted practice. Contractor may conduct planting operations under unseasonable conditions, without additional compensation, by accepting full responsibility for subsequent resulting losses. B. Underground Conditions: 1. Locate utility lines and underground obstructions to avoid damage during excavation. 2. Contractor shall repair and replace damaged buildings, equipment, underground utilities, irrigation equipment, paving, surfacing, stairs, and other work damaged as a result of Contractor's operations. 3. Locate and clearly mark irrigation pipe, wire, valves, and other underground equipment. 1.8 SEQUENCING AND SCHEDULING A. Coordinate ordering of materials with Owner immediately following General Contract award. Ensure that specified sizes and quantities are furnished. B. Planting Schedule: Contractor is responsible for using good horticultural practices and judgment regarding timing of planting. 1.9 WARRANTY A. Warranty Period for this work is as stated in General Conditions and begins at Owner acceptance. Warranty period for all plant material shall be one year from date of Owner acceptance. 1. Guarantee replacement: Acceptance of sample plants does not constitute acceptance of all plants. Final acceptance of plants shall occur at Owner acceptance of the completed project. PLA1'TI1'G 02930 -3 ,, Bniu: lJ..:i·s & A.1soda/es 20(A Boeing Building 25-01 HFSCO, '""d Wall Installation Planting Section 02930 l\m·ember 6. 2009 Bid Set a. Plant materials: Warrant to be healthy and thriving. b. Remove and replace immediately during the Guarantee Period: Dead, diseased, dying, broken, or missing plant materials (except as noted below). Use specified plant and plant as specified: guarantee until acceptable, active, healthy growth is evident. c. Contractor's responsibility: During Guarantee Period, you are not held responsible for replacing plants destroyed or damaged by vandalism, accidents caused by vehicle (other than yours), or Acts of God, provided that you have exercised due care to protect the work. d. When required replacement time falls during nonplanting season, you may request Owner's permission to defer planting until proper season. If granted, immediately remove dead plants, including roots, from site. e. Backfill pits properly with topsoil. Finish grade and leave in acceptable condition until proper planting season occurs. Replace with plants of same kind and size as those originally planted. Plant as originally specified. 1.10 MAINTENANCE A. The maintenance period shall continue until final acceptance. At a mm1mum, maintenance shall include: watering, weed and pest control, and temporary barriers as required to insure healthy, thriving plant growth. PART 2 -PRODUCTS 2.1 MATERIAL -GENERAL A. Comply with Quality Assurance prov1s1ons, references, specifications, and manufacturer's data. 2.2 PLANT MATERIALS A. Meet or exceed following reference standards for quality, size, and condition: B. I. WSDA Rules Related to Standards for Nursery Stock. 2. ANSI Z60. l -l 990: Nursery Stock. 3. American Joint Committee of Horticultural Nomenclature: Standardized Plant Names. Plant abbreviations (see Drawings for complete plant list): B&B Balled and burlapped S BR Bare root M br Branches L cal Caliper EXL cont Container Ne:-,; Small Medium Large Extra large l\o common name PLAl\Tlr,G 02930 -4 f· Bn,c c· Di!L'S & :I )'SOClales 2009 Boeing Building 25-01 HESCO Flooc Nall Installation J\ovembcr 6. 2009 B1d Set dia gal Diameter Gallon 2.3 PLANTING SOIL oc tri-spaced A. Use import topsoil where shown on the Drawings. 2.4 FERTILIZER Planting Section 02930 On center Triangular spaced A. Conform to referenced FS O-F-24D, Commercial Fertilizers and WSDA Laws. B. Fertilizer for Plantings: l. "Best Paks-20-10-5 in biodegradable packet available from Simplot Turf and Horticulture, 1-800-992-6066. 2.5 MULCH A. See drawings. PART 3 -EXECUTION 3.1 PRE-PLANTING INSPECTJON A. General: Verify installation conditions as satisfactory to receive work of this section. Do not install until unsatisfactory conditions are corrected. Beginning work constitutes Contractor's acceptance of conditions as satisfactory. B. Contaminants: I. Verify existing soil conditions for contaminants that may have been discarded by other trades, such as thinner and plaster. 2. Report findings in writing immediately to Owner's Representative before placing topsoil. C. Adverse Drainage Conditions: Notify Owner's Representative in writing of adverse drainage conditions affecting plant growth. 3 2 PREPARATION A. Field Measurements: PLAl\Tll\G 02930 -5 '-Brm t' Dt:u d. Assocwtes 20())' Boeing Building 25-01 HESCO Flooc.i ,·~'al! lnstallation l',ovember 6. 2009 Bid Set Planting Section 0293[1 I. Verify actual plant layout in relation to Drawings: Make adjustments as required by Owner· s Representative. 2. In shrub planting areas, follow specified distances on center rather than estimated number of plants, be it a larger or smaller quantity. B. Plant Locations: l. Stake all mass planting border locations with three-foot wood stakes for acceptance by Owner's Representative. 2. Make required field adjustments as directed by Owner's Representative. 3. Shrubs may be staked out by boundary rather than individual plants. 4. Avoid obstructions such as irrigation equipment. C. Protect the public, adjacent properties, surfaces, and surrounding areas to prevent harm during Work of this Section. 3.3 INSTALLATION A. Install the Work in accordance with References and specifications. 3.4 FINISH GR.A.DING A. Finish subgrade and obtain approval of Owner's Representative before you start planting or place any soil. Finish subgrade shall be smooth and conform to the final finish grade after soil placement. Allow for added soil in individual plantings as specified. 3.5 PLANTING A. Preparation: I. 3. Before planting, soak dry rootballs. Prune broken roots 1/2 inch or greater in diameter. Make clean cuts. Plant when plant materials are available and weather conditions arc consistent with good horticultural practice. B. Plant Pits: I. 3. PLANTING Dig plant pits and plant according to details. Waste excess pit spoils evenly over sub grade. If you encounter clay soil or unusual conditions likely to be detrimental to new plantings, notify Owner·s,Representative immediately. Remove unsuitable material excavated from plant holes and dispose of it legally off project site. 02930 -6 '( Bn1, ,. Den & A~socwleS ]U{!(,, Bo~ing Building 25-()l HESCO FlDc :\n,·crnhu f;_ 20U9 1all Insu1llatiirn Bid Sc! Planting Su:tion IJ29]U 4. Install plants with POSITIVE drainage awa,· from rootba\l. unless otherwise noted. C. Fertilizer: 1. Prior to completing backfilling rootball, place Best Paks on sides evenly around rootball, 6., minimum and 8 .. maximum below the finish grade and approximately two inches from root tips. Owner's Representative shall be present when Best Paks are installed. 2. Place quantities as indicated and in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. a. 3 paks per tree D. Planting: 1. Place and hold plant in center of hole, approximately 2 inches above normal growing position and backfill with soil approximately halfway. 2. Remove the entire wire basket and burlap. 3. Backfill to within 5 inches of finish grade; fill hole with water and allow to settle. 4. Backfill to finish grade. 5. Raise plants settling below finish grade to correct elevation. E. Plant Tags: I. 2. F. Soil: l. Remove and dispose of nursery labels, tags and stakes. Do not remove yellow, plastic lock-seals with serial numbers until end of Warranty period. Place soil to a uniform depth as shown on the plans. 3.6 MliLCHING A. Before installing mulch, obtain acceptance of the Owner·s Representative of planting areas, grades, soil depths, and plant locations. B. Install mulch layer under all existing and new plantings Lo the limits and depths as shown on the Drawings. C. Install uniform mulch layer material to the depths shown on the Dra\\·ings o,·er cleaned and graded subsurface. D. At plant trunks and stems, taper mulch back from root ball crown so mulch docs not touch bark. PLA/\Tl!\C, 02931) -7 ,:,· R1l1< 1-!Jel'.I c'~ A1rnuu,'n }.1;!/) Boeing Building 2~-1)1 HESCO F!t1r) ·val\ lnst2.lla1inn Planting Sccti,rn U.2 1))0 i\ll\\'.111hLT h. :2()(19 Bid Sci 3.7 A. 3.8 A. 3.9 A. FlNAL lNSPECTION Remove defective materials: in their place, install new materials, as specified. Furnish in same variety and current size of existing healthy plant materials, subject to ]-year guarantee beginning at the date of new installation. Remove any weeds. CLEANING Sweep paving clean. Leave installations properly planted, clean, and orderly; premises free from scatterings and other residue of work. Leave site neat and clean at end of each working day. l. Remove and dispose on site such items as excess earth, clippings, trimmings, leaves, litter, and debris. 2. Rake planting areas to an even, fine grade. Wash hard surfaces clean. 3. Remove flag labels from plantings. PROTECTlON OF COMPLETED WORK lnstall barriers as necessary and required to protect the work during Guarantee Period, or for shorter period as directed. END OF SECTION 02930 PLA'sT!Vi ():2(,,3[_1 " ;.., \Urn,! lhc.1<.\::1,11_,cwtc,YY1<; .. .. City of Renton Planning Division CIT' RENTON Development Services Planning & Zoning 235-2550 llldei~if Contact: ___ ~--=------- Appeals & Waivers Binding Site Plan/Short Plat Conditional Use Fees Environmental Review Fees Grading & Filling Fees Lot Line Adjustment Routine Vegetation Mgmt. Shoreline Substantial Dev 000/345 .81.00 .03 ----000/345 .81.00.04 ___ _ 000/345.81.00.06 ___ _ 000/345.81.00.07 ----000/345.81.00.11 ----000/345.81.00.12 ----000/345.81.00.15 1-......----000/345.81.00.16 ---- ,.,...J Approved For Payment: /}' Y/ . ,., _,;;.- Boeing Representative Signature DSplnzn2017/31/92 Date:_'-,------- -0 l 126 City Staff Authorization Project Name: __________ .,.... ____ , _____ ._ \. Work Order/Function --------- Site Plan Approval 000/345.81.00.17 Variance Fees 000/345.81.00.19 Planning/Zoning Misc. 000/345.81.00.20 Maps (taxed) 000/341.50.00.00 Photo Copies 000/341.60.00.24 Publications (taxed) 000/341.60.00.24 Postage 000/05.519.90.42.0l ___ _ Tax 000/231.70.00.00 Other (Description) Acct# Amount " Total!' -+-------- • .. . Printed: 11-10-2009 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA09-149 11/1012009 01 :36 PM • Receipt Number: R0904890 Total Payment: 75.00 Payee: BOEING BILLING 96327 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 75.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment BILL 96327 75. 00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelirn/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Horne Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE -USE 3954 5955 000.05.519.90.42.l Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .oo .00 .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 .00 .00 N 73,200 LcJ \_ PROPOSED R.O,W, \ I ,o ' \ SYM RE'liSION \ \0 \ \ \0 \ \ \ BY \o \ \ ' \ 0 \ \ \ ,o APPROVED DATE ! -----F SYM I --------1- 1 I --------r·· ~--/ ', ~· \ ~ I '· ·-_,. "·=--- REVISION GADD filename, R, \DRAWINGS\0559 -BOEING FLOOD PROTECnON\00 -PR[L/MINARY\0559-LPZDWG I/ Xrefs, [05598ASE.DWG] [ABDS/MPDWG} I/ Plotted, 11.05,09--15,36 By:(sjensen) I I 01 ! I ------~--i I , I I l !01--- -,--~! I 1 -I I l I I 101 ----i i I I ---------------- 10 I -I ~-11 1 111 I I I APPROVED DATE --==- ------~ ==> "-·· -..... .,, ···--·- =~---- ="-"="'"';'-' II 01 II,~-~ 11 0 ~ ~ 1:11~ II p ·-··· ----------' I 011 ... ----, II 11 -----·---- I 011 II ! :,,,;;.l'r--0· " -c.=co.,,c'CC"."'=c"-"'> r I, . t Q -------10 l -----· I I ! I 101 I I l ! I I I 101 I T I I I 1 I 0' I I ------1 I I =~--.. ---=- =--·----- ·~---------. I I I 101 I i 10 ! ! -~~-- -~----- ------ --------=, ACCEPTABILllY THIS DESIGN AND/OR ~i ', / SPECIFlCATION IS APPROVED APPROVED BY DEPT, DATE STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED !J,NDSCN'E Afir.t-llTECT i\l\1H B. DEES eamRC'irE No. 200 , --·--~---t22'7t~Zt ---e?LZJ ~ ------·------- ==--- ------"'= ' 'I I 011 i--- 11 I 11 !--~ j I 11 011 =z,-,c,-_-,,,._-,_c., 11 1' ------ 1 11 r-· 011 I .. --~--~----~ !--~~ -~rr;;~ ! -r~~- 11 1 0 J I 11 r------··"--· 11 I 11 F""'- =--· '" -- ,.________ i 011 "I -- 11 I ~ I -I , ____ _ =------- ~=~----11 ~-----, -: ~ f _ ~-". 11., I D WN DATE SUBlTTLE S,JENSEN 11.06,09 11.06,09 11.06,09 1TTI..E ---- 73,200 ----------~--1 ... ,_, =="'-"------ ===~=~c=-~·= . . '''" --~=- i~=:;;;c3~~ (_0_r_ 0_~ I l T 1 I ~ 0__ 1--":.. I I f I I .. 0_ 1--0 __ l I -~; I I 0_ f __ "'- I I I ' . 0 __ 1-_":_ I I I -I I -0 -1-":.. / I I f I I 0 I 0 r: .. -1-·' - ! I • N7,3,000 PLANTING PLAN -GRID 7 HESCO FLOOD WALL INSTALLATION BUILDING 25--01 LANDSCAPE MASTER COL X-X/X-X 20' 1 o' o t.-v--20' I=== 1 "=20' SCALE: TYPICAL PLANTING NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING UTILllY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTACT 'CALL BEFORE YOU DIG' AT (800)424-5555 FOR FIELD LOCATION ASSISTANCE WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. RETAIN A PRIVATE LOCATOR SERVICE TO LOCATE UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE. 2. ALL CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTINGS SHALL RECEIVE MULCH RINGS PER DETAILS. 3. FOR lYPICAL PLANTING DETAILS -SEE SHEET LP500. 4. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE NURSERY GROWN AND SIMILAR IN SIZE AND FORM. 5. STAKE ALL TREE LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO DIGGING TREE PLANTING PITS. 6. LOCATE EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATING TREE PITS. HAND DIG TREE PITS WHERE REQUIRED TO AVOID DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILllY LINES. IF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE FOUND TO INTERFERE WITH THE PROPOSED TREE LOCATION(S), ADJUST THE TREE LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED TO AVOID THE CONFLICT AND STAKE THE LOCATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE TREE(S). 1 16 21 City of Renton Planning Division NOV 1 0 Wu, \. / \~ ~ '-9~:;J ) -,~ 22------23 '·,· · 2, 25'..../ ·1·0 5 ·-···-----:=__: . -------L ,, "' ,.,K=-EY,__,_P"""LA""'Ni._ ____ ~N SCALE: NONE ~ CURREITT REVISION SYMBOL DATE 11.06.09 SHEET LP? JOB NO, coMPcf!fu9-LP7.dwg LONGACRES DWG NO, 25-01-LP7 I SYM ,, / 0 0 • j (',j • * I') 0 0 0 LO w 8 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 ..r''"'-\ 0 + -+ 0 • (~ . ) I') L() w I I '\,..,...J'J I 10 I 0 + I I : I e I I . ' - 0 0 0 0 25 03 0 (!) • I') w 2.5 02 I 0 0 + 0 i ---------------------~------____ ,.______ II I I ,I} : I ----------.. -·--------~-------i---~;t,-.!.,-------r--------- N 73 1200 0 + * 0 0 ! ! 0 0 + 0 0 . * I O O : :··--. ~1 /\ \ : N 73,200 = _ _ _ _ __PROPE~ LINE ------,_ ~ _ ----, __ ,----_ ----_ _ _ ----l~ 1--------__ -----_ ----------___ ·-__ ----------__ --------___ __(1_ ____ .. _ ------_ .... ----__ -----__ -----__________ l ~-·· _I __ ---... ... --__ ------__ --_:_~ ____ --_--_--_--_-_·_·-_-__ -_-_-_ .. _-_--_-_· -_-_ I_ --~_fl-~ L------_ --L ____ j ____ -----=-v------r----------v-----------.. -v-----.. -----•, .. , 'I" I o o * i~' 0 Oj I ·----------' -'---------1 '1 I I ,-----.c: F'ROPOSED R.OON. * O O '"~t-:r•M----,------_ _Q_ ______________ o ____________ -t ______________________________________ .. ___ ;-----------------+-, I I Ill -, . LYYYYY~J~~ // y-yyy-,ryyyy -.-..-.rYYYYYYY''<YYVV'Y"YY~~·y,1~ ,r•("-('YY"'Y-rrrrrYYYVYYYYYYYYYYYY'~rrrrYYYY'YYYVYYYV ( \ • • ' • ~VY[,'(''r,~r~~y"''f"YY' • • ' ~ ' . :<,i • :._ ~) ____ ~-,;_-... ...... .. .. ~ ... ~=--+--· _ ,. 1. ~ lfrrf~r-/··~•"t'Y'V""rvYV"YYYYY'VV'Y'Y"~ ...----~-------~ ~ .... -.. --, •&61AIV 0 ,-=-"= _ ~"' = = = = = =" : a::=-=::,-=,=-== :4 ::_::_= =--= -,;,,= :"= = ,= ~~ = :cp :::_ = = _== = "= =": --= :. -= = =' _:: = = = = ~ = ~ ~ = ---"')!( ----~= --~ -.. :-----·-:----------: --~:: ... :=--···· --~,---... --~-: i ® -:11:-·-· ~T,--- -. I·=\ I I I I I I I 0 PROPERTY LINE "'-7 LJ':,. o 5/FH ---- S. W. 16th STREET "'' I I I I I I :i: I I I I I I I I I ~I~ I I I I I I I I I I I I ----------I I f·t -1---1 ----1 r .. --------------------------_ .. ------\ il! ) i--~ --~---~---I I I I i ~ c!-'.:".-.... --:Jlt_;;::::;;-::;; ... *=---..... -------' ' -~ ----------T ---------------------------- === --==:·_J~=il-::;;· .. --c_;;::--;;::;;c-;;::--=-;;;;;_;;;;;_;;;;_=¥ .. ;;;;::._;;::c.::::;;:c;;;;;·--;;;;;;c;c.-.. ;;;_.::;;;_--;;;;_::;;_ ::;; __ =;:_=;;;;-=---=;;::-::;;·::m,<~-.-===-':_;;;;-::_;;;-_;;;::;;-=·· ====--.=.~--..... ---:::~::::::;; __ ::;;;_;;;::;;-c_::;;-...• ::;;ccc;;:::::;;::=-.. -::;;._-_;;;;_ ;;;;; _ _;:;;;-;;;; ___ =::;;·::;;--;;;;--",-,:;:; / · i I ----,:~ I I -"'---~-..l.-Uf._..-::;-;::,::l--~V-b-;;·-;-~'i ; • o 1 o I l· .. ·1 •, I •, t->1~ • .. -------·-o --'l ., L ... I--l~~~---- 1 I _ ' -----... -------"""'--- " I ' __ !;==r-:: I ------------1 ,-·-",------·-·11_:_ -T i -=-1 _____ I ··--.. __ \ _ T _I_ -_ J_ 1 1· i i . ;~Movi .. (2J~x1~~NG ~E~-II DEt-(1 I" ~~-~I:·: GRl~ .. ;;~UMP 1-~1 ---i, r--1 . Ii I i \1 . 'I : I ! -: I f' GRADE AND BACKl!"ILL WITH 110PSOIL, C0MPAOi TO 85% 'TO MATCH 'FINIS J ' "=''1 GRADE, REPLACE WITH (23) NEW WESTERN LARCH TREES (6' -7' HT. MIN.), SET NEW TREES 13' FROM BACK OF CURB, STAKE TREE LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO PLANTIN.{,, RE-SEED AREAS OUTSIDE OF NEW TREE ----1-----i-- AND ROOTS WITHIN THE EXIST TREE RING ( 4 DIA.±) TO 18 BELOW FINIS _ 1------.... --.. _ -·----------·------------------·----· -----· -- 0 1 0 I -~-·. ->· ---. -~ I ·1 --------' I I l _0 _[ 0 _ i f I 1"'i I I . ~ ----~ ' ' I I _0 -1 __ 0 _ .I I l I 0 I 0 I --1 ---"i _., l i I r RE'IISION 0 N I') r·--. -----tf) i w GRADE AND BACKFILL WITH TOPSOIL, COMPACT TO 85% TO MATCH FINISH iJlj I .. = =:.. · , -------1--T ----------· ------- GRADE, REPLACE WITH ( 4) NEW WESTERN LARCH TREES ( 6' -7' HT. MIN.), -----_r • '\ ,'-L . IDJ SET NEW TREES 13' FROM BAC~OF CURB, STAKE TREE LOCATIONS 1~0R ";\ : . 1 ,,inm,- APPROVAL PRIOR TO PLANTING, RE-SEED AREAS OUTSIDE OF NEW TREE \ \ fl -1 ------·---------..... ------ MULCH RINGS TO MATCH EXl~ING (SEE DETAIL 1 lYPICAL) 'llll ·;~--.---· ... ~~2 --·-110 11 ----------11 I ----------., 1 ----11 i 11 0 -----·---' ' ---~--11 ll -----~ I ------11 110 I ' ~--~--'i I 11 -·-----1 I I -~- 1, 0 =""-==""-="'-= I,.' -·--·---- 11 ---1• !I --cc=-~ l 110 I ::11- 1 .. ::, .. ~LZIJ 1101 ·--- 11 ---~ ----'1 I II~ -~ I 11 " -----"-" ~·- ·--------~,,.=.-=~-cl I BY APPROVED DA1E SYM MULCH RINGS TO MATCH EXISTING (SEE DETAIL lYPICAL) \ \, l_ -' -------------I 1.~} I 1 I ~ l\\~~[/1 11 ___ l_ --.. -- . ------------- · · -----T 1 r r r --------· r r r t i r .. ........ r r T 1 -, T r 1 · "µFe:-~::=: -""1..::...-~~=-41, .. r .... ::=-=-: "'i·---:'.:::_ ® t-.. __ -i@ -.. = "'~-. -. -_© ! . ·-··. -. -® i-. ---~ !-. -. -.. @_ t-. -! (&. . 2 !--~! . -. _Q)_!. ,@, -. _@ ~. ---} T~ ::'---4----I--_,_,,, - -_01 I [] -~---c,c--r----r-r-r---r--r-r--.----,------,----,--r-,----.-----,------,--D+----.--.. ·'----::.::---1---r------.---=--r'--i -,----,-,---,-:;i;:-,--r---,------rrl I 1----./-+-+-f---] V, I , /,//,-~[·---;s;,-77*7*···TR=;,LJ,;'Tr:;J/~7/ /77 /"7··, 7-h/,~~~--+!,, ~, r~, ~/~'.//777/7 ;/ / / , )'=?1Jl ~;,:77=· ;z'::;, ;z=;r-;,7~.// ' -·--· -=···· . -...... N 73,000 ,--~-·-----.. ~ I I " i . I I --t . I I I I , " I I ·----------s--p I <----1 I ! I • I 17'7,T~z~· .,---•. -.--!--, --i , , ----r -1-I i;Yj /,f . I I \, ,. /' / .. ' ·:, -I ;r-1 ' --( =""J __ .£ ---=~/,--~ r 1 _ -~--1 _;..... ••. ~~ 25 01 " I 11 1,--p ! ,___, ! I 1---fl / I I r , " . I REVISION BY APPROVED 0 0 -+ I') LO w DA1E ~~~ STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED u,NDSCAPE AAtHrrECf AL\'1N il. OffS CERT!rJCAlt. No. 200 ACCEPTABILl1Y THIS DESIGN AND/OR SPECIFICATION IS APPROVED APPROVED BY DEPT, DATE DRAWN S.JENSEN 0 0 '° • I') LO Lu D JE SUBTITI.E 11.06.09 PLANTING PLAN -GRID 8 11.06.09 11.06.09 TITLE HESCO FLOOD WALL INSTALLATION BUILDING 25--01 LANDSCAPE MASTER COL. X-X/X-X CADO filename: R: \DRAW/NGS\0559 -BOEING FLOOD PROT[CTION\00 -PRCUMINARY\0559-LPB.DWG fl Xrefs: [05598ASE.DWG] [ABDSTMP.DWG} ff Plotted: 11.05.09-15:36 By:(sjensen) -. ",.,.-,-,,,._._.,,., ... ,.,,,.;,.,,,_. ,_,_-,.,,·,-,,.~,;~~.,",','••" ' I "· TYPICAL PLANTING NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING UTILllY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTACT 'CALL BEFORE YOU DIG' AT (800)424-5555 FOR FIELD LOCATION ASSISTANCE WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. RETAIN A PRIVATE LOCATOR SERVICE TO LOCATE UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE . 2. ALL CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTINGS SHALL RECEIVE MULCH RINGS PER DETAILS. 3. FOR lYPICAL PLANTING DETAILS -SEE SHEET LP500. 4. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE NURSERY GROWN AND SIMILAR IN SIZE AND FORM. 5. STAKE ALL TREE LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO DIGGING TREE PLANTING PITS. 6. LOCATE EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATING TREE PITS. HAND DIG TREE PITS WHERE REQUIRED TO AVOID DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILllY LINES. IF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE FOUND TO INTERFERE WITH THE PROPOSED TREE LOCATION(S), ADJUST THE TREE LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED TO AVOID THE CONFLICT AND STAKE THE LOCATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALILATION OF THE TREE(S). 11 16 21 City of Renton Planning Division NOV 1 0 1009 \ ~ . ,c--, " ' ' ~ "'~....:::::::. 1.:, --22·----,-_23_• 0 -2 ----·· -.... ---25 ----- ll!KE=-JY~P""LA""-NIL-----9 SCALE: NONE ~ CURRENT REVISION SYMBOL DATE 11.06.09 SHEET LP8 JOB NO, coMP d!fu9-LP8.dwg LONGACRES DWG NO. 25-01-LP8 '~···· ' ' ' ' . _, ..... ,.•,,•_•, -,,,, __ ," ------,·-'. . ' .. .;, ' < :...; __ .__ . -~"" ' 0 I I I 25 02 40 I lo I I . . 'I ,, l N 73,000 SYM · REVISION I~ ....J ,1 ' :/ ~ ,W a. -~ I Q. ' ' ' 25 B't' 0 0 co I") LO j,J + 0 0 ro w APPROVED ----- 01 DATE SYM REVISION GADD menumec R:\DRA>llNGS\0559 -BOEING FLOOD PRO!EC110N\OO --PREUMIIIAFIY\0559-LP9,DWG // Xrefs: {0559BAS£.DWG] [ABDSTMP.DWG] // Plotted, 11.06.09-10:30 By,(sjensen) 0 B't' APPROVED DATE ,- ' ' \ \ ~ ) '-~ / r- 1 IIIIEIArD• ~, STATE OF WASHINGTON RE:CISTERED LAADS0\PE AACHllc"Cf ALVIN B, DEES CTJffiflCATt No. 209 RETAIMll"G lt./ALL- \ * * * === ------* D + 0 ACCEPTABILITY DATE 11.06.09 THIS DESIGN AND/OR SPECIFICATION IS APPROVED 11.06.09 APPROVED BY DEPT. DATE A.B.DEES 11.06.09 CHECKED APPROVED \ \ * I I I~\ I I I * + ,, ~ I,, 11""1 ·i· I~ C: +- SUBTTTLE mu: IZ 11""1 I I \ \ 0 0 N ' l '··-RElAINIMG WALL w \ ' 73,200/ \ \\ \ i---4--APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK CHANNEL EDGE ~ lJJ uJ Ct:'. (~) -~'L () 0 0:: [O (_) 7 0:: 0.. (.f) -l- \ N 73,000 \ I PLANTING PLAN -GRID 9 HESCO FLOOD WALL INSTALLATION BUILDING 25--01 LANDSCAPE MASTER COL. X-X/X-X ,, "•'' .,_ ,,·---.,~--,,,-... ,,.,. TYPICAL PLANTING NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING UTILl1Y LOCATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTACT 'CALL BEFORE YOU DIG' AT (800)424-5555 FOR FIELD LOCATION ASSISTANCE WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. RETAIN A PRIVATE LOCATOR SERVICE TO LOCATE UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE. 2. ALL CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTINGS SHAUL RECEIVE MULCH RINGS PER DETAILS. 3. FOR TYPICAL PLANTING DETAILS -SEE SHEET LP500. 4. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE NURSERY GROWN AND SIMILAR IN SIZE AND FORM. 5. STAKE ALL TREE LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO DIGGING TREE PLANTING PITS. 6. LOCATE EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATING TREE PITS. HAND DIG TREE PITS WHERE REQUIRED TO AVOID DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITY LINES. IF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE FOUND TO INTERFERE WITH THE PROPOSED TREE LOCATION(S), ADJUST THE TREE LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED TO AVOID THE CONFLICT AND STAKE THE LOCATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE TREE(S). City of Renton Planning Division NOV l D 1009 _,.,K-=-EY_,__,_P_,,,LA'-"N'-'-------Q SCALE: NONE ~ CURREITT REVISION SYMBOL DATE 11.06.09 SHEET LP9 JOB NO •. coMP o'1fu9-LP9.dwg LONGACRES DWG NO. 25-01-LP9 ' ·--. ·--,; . .··,.1···., · · .. -sc•"'··•;·· .. ,,,-..... -·,.,., ·' ·-•,'"I'·,,•!,·>.,,.,, ., .,. ,,, •. ,,-,,,,,,.,,. •li1 ·,,,;•:,-, • ' . SYM -·--"irl'il -.. ' [J 2" MULCH RING NOTE: REMOVE WIRE FROM ENTIRE ROOTBALL AFTER PLACEMENT IN HOLE. i;i __ ,_JG NOTE: SET ROOT CROWN AT OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISH GRADE. NOTE: SEE DETAIL FOR TREE( 2 \ STAKING LP500 LP500 TREE ROOTBALL r--SCARIFY SUBGRADE 1 ', CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL LP7,LP8,LP9 LP500 SCALE: 1/'r -1 '-o" RE.'IISION BY APPROVED DATE SYM I( " ~ I fl - 11~1 \'::~ t.:: 11 .\ 11 TREE GUYING ¥4"GREEN 'ARBORTIE'-.,_ ,-"-c-_ : : (OR APPROVED EQUAL) WITH "" 'i 1 1 ~ TREE PLANTING 1 900LB BREAKING STRENGTH ~c", -. 1 I ;vJ I I 2" DEPTH FINE HEM-FIR } c_\~i i · J .!, MULCH (OR APPROVED EQUAL) ~~i5+--~ RING AROUND TREE TRUNKS IN ,r ~ HYDROSEED AREAS (2" DEPTH ?. ,,, -rl" :i:::\~o• , ::::;; MULCH OVER ROOTBALL), MULCH , ; 1 1 ~.-_.i,;,.D-i ~ AVAILABLE FROM SAWDUST SUPPLY <' "_ 206-622-4321 , ~ LIMITS OF TREE PIT·~ I "'.) 1---'.:::...-'--/---l 1---~ • MIN. DEPTH THREE 2"0.D. WOOD STAKES--' ARRANGED IN TRIANGULAR SPACING AROUND TREE ~ INTO UNDISTURBED ~~_._SUBGRADE ( 2' CONIFEROUS TREE STAKING DETAIL LP500 LP500 SCALE : 1 /'r = 1 '-o" REVISION BY APPROVED DATE IIIIEIA,11• GADD /iienamec R:\DRAWINGS\0559 -BOEING FLOOD PROf[CnON\00 ·-PREUM/NARY\0559-LP500.DWG II Xrefs: [ABDSTMP.DWG] II Plotted: 11.05.09-15.37 By:(,ymsen) ACCEPTABILITY DRAWN JE /a.,, ~ 11.06.09 !! THIS DESIGN AND/OR SPECIFICATION IS APPROVED ~E 11.06.09 APPROVED BY DEPT. DATE A.B.DEES 11.06.09 STATE OF ED WASH!NOTON REGISTERED lAIJDSCAPt !\RctllIECf ~ N.\<11-l B. DEES APPROVED CtRW ICA1E No. 200 SUBTITLE PLANTING DETAILS lln.E HESCO FLOOD WALL INSTALLATION BUILDING 25--01 LANDSCAPE MASTER COL. X-X/X-X LONGACRES CURRENT REVISION SHEEJ ,. oi Renton (iii.':/ . Oi'i\s1on p\snn1n9 i\OIJ \ o l~u, ~'{§f&tw:.~'iJ~fi> sYMBOL DATE 11.06.09 LP500 JOB NO. coM/l~9-LP500.dwg DWG NO. 25-01-LP500 ;., -". -1,--;: -·,·,·. -----,-·:f\ .. f_,_,'., .. •.-:.·'.ill.·.]''_-/:.·'