No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 1D A e ·a F D \,\ o. ·. ':) \, \::, <>Y'. M \:\ f Y\ b C, "' Washington -Renton City of n p ,,enton lanning 0 .. IVISion North 8th and Park Avenue North, Renton, WA 98055 ·------------------+·------- Boeing Employees-- Flying Association ~ ~ H« :"°:'·""----~ fil Rivertech ! -· -"'i'J __ Corparata.Centar 1 I SW7THST ;I SW 16THST East Valley From Office Center Longacres b D ,.~ Park '• SW 19TH ST 'i/m • >w ., m "' w I > • I 0 z 0 Revised 10-07 S3RDST--+ S 4TH ST Nov 2 4 Z009 D ~~~l~LntEcc~o~~ ' ,A e C D ----~--- 7'207 Triton Tower Three ® E 7-206 I Triton Tower Two i I ' 0 Employee gates __ ,, ___ 0 AMS Turnstile gates Fence lines D Boeing property D General parking D Restricted parking ® Bus stop ® Helistop I D Copyright 2007= The Boeing Company. All rights reserved. ------ ., -·------+-- ', BOE~NG COMMERC~AL A~RPLANES · 1-1-,_ ..,,,,1...-..-11.Dloo • 1-I - rt1-a11//lUffU/lll' CODE SUMMARY OESCRll'TION OF WO!l1( llfl'M'!Of'iP'"JUl!Uf!tli gmJ!ffll!IP UW:CS•Tll(MOl'S TO "°""'CED<lllll!IOGl C0"1RACTO!it:-----------~-- OOONG PROJECT ENCmEl!~ BOEING CONTACT· -- ~"'°' ~ APPUCATIONS/PERl,ms RELl,f[D TO PROJECT: ~ ~.ffi..-· ZONING: HE.l,.VI' INt)./Pl)BLIC USE BUIIJ)ING CODE; BARRIER nm: REOUl~Et<TS OCCU!'~C"T" GROUP:(SEC. CONSTRUCTION M'L'(SEC. ) AU.OVl'ABLE /,RE.I,. INCREASE, fLOOR AREk(ACTUAI__) 8UIL!IING HEIGlfT:(~ $-O) STORIES· OCCUPNfr lOAD:W-l~) omtES (T~~FA) ~=[ ~fWsr """""' 0=' t,WIUF>i:1\JRING 1 200Sf' Al..L OTHER 1 1 OOSf F1RE PROTECTION· S[l'IJ'>,TIQN m -m5-8£ARLNG) UT. W""--l eu.l!IN{;J "'· -~ -BUHtNG) INT. W""--l 8™1NG) STRI.ICfU ~E ~(h.~rfu~ON SEISMIC DESIGN. OtSK;N I..O,l,l)S:(CflAPTER 23) ,ioor, ~ow = FLOOR: OfnCE :~STOR CONCENTAATtO· MFR LIGHT llf1! HEAVY -" WINO [)(f'OSUR( 2006 UBC ,1, "' "' "' BL~F001~ fll~ST • ~~~ ~ "' B.O.SEMDlf § ""' """ SECOND FL A 111:iwn~ REIIOOEL~ E 2~f>SF '"" •• "'' .,. •• •• "" ~ NOTE: SPU:10,1,_ CONOITIONS MAY [X!ST IN fAC"IOF!' Alt£>5 ~ l()A[l'.NG WITH r>eiunts Pl.ANT ENGINEER PRIOfl TO DESIGN. DRAWING INDEX ----=---.,,. -,_, "' • CODE SUMMAlfl" & DR.I.W!NG INOCX ,_, "" • SflE PLIH & LECAL OESCRPTION N "'' • COLO!lED SITE: MN' ·-~ ~ • BOONc: OWNED PROPER'! SITE 11W' ,_, " • DEMOUTION PLAN ,.., ~ • PROJ£CT PWI H " • ""~' H " • ---"" -= -c-, "" • PNilW. SITT: TOPOGRN'!IIC PUii c-, "" ' PARTIAL SIT[ TOl'QCR.IPtllC PUii City of Renton Planning Division NOV 2 4 2009 fR1~CC~U~~IQ) ' ! COVER SH;;EET;~l1e)(___-F!--'="';':;;;"i;=7f~A'-j--;:;'"·ru=;m---j1i CODE SUMMARY & D~WING INDEX ;--~ """""" ~~ so j):_1 , ...ccE:PT.o.BIL.llY -=-11-~ """ NORTH CEDAR RIVER BRIDGE ~ ~ ""'',-------Y:" ::]a ~UIW_IIIS!rR _, ~-NGRCllcSO \ BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANES LEGEND: ~ 800NG Ol'IIED PROPEl!1T ~ENll.lN.IIAStflNCION98055 ' !l~e~ fr. -~~;;~?~~~~®-~~= .. .. c::i_ 1~NOR1HCEDARRIVERREPAIR (\ ~ . PROJECT LOCATION I ! ~~-- PUGE! SOUND R£CION ~ .J ...... ..,.,.-... ,,,1.-1--1 .. :.,,.1- ~.U.,.N. !!_E~ ® .. 1-,- 'IL ; [ ~\J\ i t ~; ~ ~\~z "'£ ~-Th \ ~ ~ ::,.:: ~ 0 ~ q_ .,\t ~- ~ R-c n ~':i ~~ ~o nC oz ~o i~ ~ City of Renton Planning Division NOV 2 4 2009 fPJ~CC~OW'~© • ~ BOEINGOWNEDPROPERTYSITEMAP I =»,i-A[ ~"m If NORTH c~;;;~a; BRIDGE: S0~§-38 i .....,,,, I Id ST1!IJCT1.iRAI. ll'SlTil Al)i!Cfll-.._ R™-NSROG-~ z 0 i== a. 0::: {.) Cf) w 0 ...J <( . (.9 w ...J i: ©l 0 ..... ™ c. = = ~ Cl) . = -er: ... = -,,.. ™ O· > g ~ 0 z l!!!JJ 0 @"£: en w z <( _J a.. 0::: <( _J <( -(.) 0::: w ~ ~ 0 (.) (9 z w 0 cc l 5-~0'1 lf 1 L, ! 1 '· ,I l'lt l'lt ,1 I' !Ure ii. , 'I ~!-l'I r.i l it , I ,. ,· M iiJ 1 1!1 i ij1i! ; 'It ! =i' i ! eM §:! •j j• !,!,!![ 111 11 Ii: r1 1m ·1 ·r JI 'l pJll, 1w11n ,!l'.ll ill ' i!! • ,I I 11 I , , ,I Ii•' ii. , 11 ii1 ! r1!1 t i'~ l'I :!" ~! l'I : .. ,, 1ii ! :: 1ii I :;i'· ' 111 ! Ii I 111 ! ll!j I !1ji1, !1ji11·ij lj I • ij i ,!II 1m ., 11 1rn ,, 11,,1 i 1R1 11 !ii f Pil 11 111:, l 11!,1 11!,1!!! PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY I I . I ~ z ES" 5~ z: ·.'.. a'i ~ ""'""""''" ........ . "' ~ ch I I 1 I • I I I I I ' . l c,,,r;~~ Timber BLMOn•M 10·-o:12·-o"12·-o·, 2B·-'1 ..i \r,W} ~5 (JS'J s~...,1 ~i'• ee~lr \ 'pEPll" oEP:tt o!c'PT" \ \ I ' . _._ \/ %t°'P< (7"'' SI,~! Pile- ~ oc / S nk 4.0 --. I ----] t.: -0-Cl,-l \ ~·c. 2-/8 ~80V ~I . ' I i \ i \ ~------ \ \ \ rl" 011Ua11--\ \ \ \ ' ' I \ . ' I : f of Po~~r,ent --------i---·r ---------\ \ . ' I \ . ' I ' . ' I : . ' I : \ \ 1 \ ==~~r-1T'" \ I i \ , .. I I I\ I, \ i ; I , r-J·•• \ ;1' \ c, I ! -~ --"- -·-1 ·, I" , I I i, I ' ' t-+ fr~r,,,q f"Jk \ \ \ \l~ ' •d e~·o .. LAKE WASHJNGTON I ---Y i \ I \ \ \ 'ii, 'no ;-:-~\ l\ I~' £-,,:,.~ .. City of Renton Planning Division NOV 2 4 2009 ~lE©~~'W~[Q) 14" I, e" A$4 ~ ,0 c.ti ""11 r Plp ... ,,,,.,-"'9""- '=-=-= s._1_-. ,===---------------------------= ==-:\\ " \\ .......... !-:Y/4"C. J /10, 440V +11'!1-! ,_r-Q."1H1'.- _ £.<lstJng tt·-1 ...1 ~-0::. 5~ .. , pil• d,pt~ \' (J5') "'" \ -,-1 rw-""'\pO'J l:i£?11"I c,[P1" o------ t~is!!ng r/jnged Sl~b \ i \ . ' 'f"'I'" J_/1 ' ~ ~ I .,, \ \ I ' •' ' ---y.2--,---1------~------------ ·t1·· ' ,: ·, \ \ , .. I" . . 1 d ~ \ \ \ • i . l .,.,\n \ \ ~; \ \ j • I I I , I l \ [d9• ~, Hir,qe Slob --------~ -----?c ,, \ \ ~ \ i \ ---· i \ ~ I \ ' ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, \\1 ,, ----' ' ' '' . r-~;i·yr \ i \••••••••••••• 30"Cll SS ' i ' ·--------'..-c:::::<::c:::::;::l, ' . w ' -::=:::::::::::; \ 0 t ~ ~ ' ' \ I l \ r·: 1· ,,,_,-OHWM ,; "l;, \?, .,, ' ' ' ~----------------- --- I \ \ i i \ \ i • 1- --siiioiii~ooss"'l.....,...I"~ . , I \ \ I \ \ L "'"'"' "'""' '"' . ~[dp orPo,,,,..,0111 [,isfjng /,"(l<~eod -1- rt1-m1111e,uo;• .::::,~ .,, I \ \ I PLAN VIEW ~-~.=.. -~.!'...["'!!c E,c/sting !.lulkh-ecd FOICMEX!Sll<GIIOTTEDllMOtR-• ((SIW,fill "' 121 SEI CD ·w RrllCM: BROl<fJ< CROUT PM! Al PILS B-4, c-• NID c-~ srr ffi ,w G) 0 0 flDICrl[ BROl((N COfO$f CU'S. SC£ (J'\ © INSIAU. IDPORARl' DElll!IS CURI• DEMOLITION PLAN ~~- tilii 58607'1 NORTH CEDAR RIVER BRIDGE -"""" A 11.0l.1$ City of Renton Planning Division NOV 2 4 2009 !Rl~~~u~~[Q) ,,. a r As.I c-,o c.t ...,,, L l"fi>fl-"*"!ollr)'n-S._T_....t_. ~=====================--======== ==--\\ ,, .t LAKE WASKINGTON \~ 1-v•·c . ., /10, •~ov ,, ,, ~ E•lstin; Timb•c Sull<l>ead SM.I Pio To,: of &nk \ ~O , -·-_..., ' ~ 1--1, .-::~--i \ ' \ 1°C, 2-IB ~80'' -+--\ \ \ ~ \ I ' . I" I i 0 i i ffi INSTALL UTILITY WcuPS, \10 EACH r---, j ,.-· . I I i i i ,, ,., .. -\ \ \ '1\~ I '·~t \ i ~ \ ~-i. i \ L.l-g __ \_ ---- t: 01 Po~~.,,_"~--------i·~-----1 \ \ \' '~ -------·-i--·--·- i ~- i I I i b 1: ii r I I -------• \ ' I I \1 \ \ ' bilmq ~ulkAel!:id e~ o" ' ' I I I l \ ,,:; i : I I Id · · I I I \ \ \ ' ~ 0 \ \ ' ' \ : I ', . ' ~+,., Jj(:t5') ~ DCPTH \(\ \_ c,,<;,, H;,,.a M ~ [dg. of _m,nl i REPAIR P!LE ' CAP, 12' Im \'w \ \ \ C) \ .,, ~ I \ \ 2_1_·-Q'.. a Ii To~ of S.,nk ,, 1~·-o" 10·-I \, ,s·-11 • 'l 1' "') ~) btTH ~ \\ +ws-1 -\'"" ,,,, '"" \~"' "" ---------, = C,.!<,H <0""' ~--------_.. ... ----I _ _.._.._.._..\\ ""' Port--_j_ ---REPAIR BEARING/I'\ \ 1\ ' .. -, ,·\ ',j r-o: '" \ ~ ,, STAG/NG AREA r,.;,11<>9 Hin9ed Slab \\1 ,, ~~i\i' ••••••••••••• )O"CP SS E'~istir,g Bulk,~~ ---------~ ' ' ' ' : \ \ ----· I I ' ' ' \ ' •••••••••1..•c-----c:l::t=-------' ' ' ' ' ' ~----------------- i i I I PLAN VIEW •illtl'Mt""""'-~I!'.". •-ln.Gl.OI Exi•ting 8ulk~•ad -1-~- ~Dll/l7.!F,?U/IJ1' ...::::~-=-- -... -__,_~::::.&!. PROJECT PLAN REPM! NORi'fi" NORTH CEDAR RIVER BRIDGE 'STR\ICI\NW. ~ ROo10N _,, A 11.0l.OII ~2 I S-5 _-,,-,--1---...- ~~· I l ·1--- ~~~ ~' .. ..::;-.;; . , .. ~-· .. ·-.. . .~---.. ~-> ..... -. -· ,• ...• -~ ·. """'"""" Jxl ·11'14llllER/~ .L.,,.... EXISTING CAP REPAIR SC)(f:1•14' """""~· .. ;: .. -. . . ·. ll'»R4'0.C.WIIERE MISSINe, ESll,IAT[ (8) -=;=, .• •. '• . . ,, .... .. CONOUIT SUPPORT s~ SClil[: ~,,. . _...,_ ••• ~~\ ~-:: .... v !,~-· ... · ...... ·.-.··· . .. ·· . .. -~ .. ,• ...• """"~;[2J ~-=wrn .L.,,.... NEW ;'..;> s~ ~S'O'.IFIAl'41'" """".W:~ .-... :. . < ·-~ E . .. I """'"""" - :'!; :· -~. ,;.. ·-. . -~ . ,• ...• .L.,,.... EXISTING GROUT REPAIR ~ - I .... ~\ . . . tt f·:.}.: < :·· .· . !, ·--~·' ;. .. -.. -··· <~ . ·-~ """" -~ .L,._ NEW s~ City of Renton Planning Division NOV 2 4 2009 IR1~©~~W~[Q) DETAILS ---1111110ml A NORTH CEDAR RIVER BRIDGE S3 -· ....__., --,,I"'."' ! &d !I s i . j =m C: C: 0 o ... ·-c: .!!l Cl) -~ a: Cl -Ol 0 -~ C: ~ Ki i:3 0:: '"" -.i .. ,..., .. : *- I ~ ' Ill !I • 11 [i I ,I I! •I· -------------·----·--·----- -....~~""""I!:~ ~~"' IJlt"-~- ·~~~~J:lr'°-6> 1-~·'i'·o'--- ..... [T ............ ~---IIW,al.'<IN ~ ••• , .... """"',n.i.""' Tl-""""'""'·~·-r; ..... u...:-~---1 -;~-~~: ... ~ ~-;i .£'1.tl.OC,' .·,, i I c..__~~;--=~ I •• :_-j :1 ' ~....-r-,. 4'/LU'U,P, ~r-J .,_,_ elm.T·'-' • -r-; !. •• ~li ~ I s .... City of Renton Planning Division 2009 [R!~~~~~[E[Q) t,,.,',T. ei.e.Gffl.OGAL - ~ -1 .... ~ -f:!, r-··, 0 ·1 .... L:1"•·,,..,,..~fl_ ,,.- ~~~, I~' 111 :: II 11 :: ' 11 II 11~1 ~,. _ _s---._!I 1 . rw .H .-,,.-x-,u "" 11 11 I ="-J II ™I .\:.,.,;...T~.·.i1,11 .. 11 ::n'Jt"'~~-II ..,.,,__. IT LJJ .. · -·, )\l ,, ~a,,0~1.,·LDWf.. ~- , • .,.,2·-o·...-:,1n•1R;im11:~ wt.'-W .. ~~.u:r-.,:-:;:~~,-- ,_;.:!,1:;wl_ I' -~· Ul$f x ....... ,. ,,_ "'tJc:.<M'.11'-"'1' I .• -,;J; ' Mfi!-1~' ';;:; : '": :c-'-,. ---' z'-r.-I j _...,·.,,.!t.,• _,--I <os'-o• I ~ ,.,. ~~ · I 1-'c•• I ~ ~ 4>,z(en$rj 18, ,;Aj" ~-.-,..,r t=(4N.llli) ~ l!!UVff"·•-f-4:.) I' __,,..,,._,(¥:;rJ . I ! Zff"~,,mw -Z/'' PLAN .... 'SECnON._,_~ ... . . IW'\ -,:V .':""".· ,;--.r-o-r, \_ ~qr·--. --"· 0 ,; ···-" . " . 1 _..( r.-_..._ • i :~~:... l fef!..d' ""*P f:iccc ~--o:,y i?'F-:3:F--~ · i~'.;,-?:f: .;:,]11ii;{l,-,i, ,,,,,,1 11 :, I r 4~ ., , -.. ·/!'~ n\· j·''.i -/ I I l 1 ' f™' -!'Pt! ft,-,;e' II If·.,, ·I~·~ ·~1 1---:11--~ ~ ··-· . ' a,, ,,, ", ~'t' 11 I Ii' ·11' \' 1 I" ' ., '' 'b u, 1U ,!l] Ur . --- ~ aACcf!&.& MS'W ~ J..£r6L f'N:Jlil U!!/iOlt:II J,IMU(. J..i# ~l1UIT' Q.. " u.z· _,i""if~J~-jou1a -~ ..... '4 ... ~_· 11 11 '] '' 11 (1 1, I I J I re-,.~, ,,,_,_ _,,,, ,._ /..J !U ,co,;,~- llilli.: ACTUAL RIVER CHANNEL BOTIOM DEP.TH AT THE NORTH CEDAR RIVER BRIDGE IS DffiRMINED BY OTHERS. SECTION-SI/OW/NG NOtf!TN G/li!OE.e .eJ/YST ,£.,0 MJT ~ SCAie -.,i '· t'-1·/ ~a74/7.ll!"POOP' -----~ ,.._ l ~ 1··· ~ .oenr-<P~ 'i°i ''!\' ,, 1,1 ,, 1,1. 11 I 1\ u I u === ~.-=.o --""·-·!""'~ I .n .... ~wWfThf~:t. ,1i;.r.i~r, -4~ ~ '"' ...,_ ""' .t,.i . ,":-*" ..... : ... ~ .if-I'..::. •·"--,,~.-., -~-~ ~~ l1~J'l· 1--II (l , ,:: , 1 l;I II 11 11!1! .1u~ u U u D ORIGINAL BRIDGE Pl.AN & SECTION FLOOD HAZARD DATA --~8RIDG£ .. ,, A NORTH CEDAR RIVER BRIDGE I•·, ~IIISl[R RO/TON S_6 _,_,. ___ _ RIN-NSRDG---S8 Oll.21.ot S-9 ~s l'IIOJ ,j C 0 § ... ·-C .!a en = (I) .2: = "' cc Cl ..... -0) ... 0 C ·c :> C) >, C z ... "' ·-a: () (QI ll!1ll ~ = l!!!:!I g l!fili ' I\ bi\1.£6 3 It • I I ' I I I I ' I I [ . · I I )- 0£1:'.86Z l 3 Ot;Zfl6Z l ] L ____ _ ® -----1 s + s ---- c~W iNcR ----- ) ) ) j I <t'IOll>/11./"''l'ltW'II !! ~ •U ! . -< a, ·-N i iu ~ 11~ ~ p; ~ ... ~·z • il! I I ! I i I I I I • • ~ ! § CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: April 12, 2010 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: Cedar River N Bridge Repair LUA (file) Number: LUA-09-154, SME Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Vanessa Dolbee Acceptance Date: December 16, 2009 Applicant: Mark Clement Owner: Boeing Corp. Contact: Same as applicant PID Number: 0723059001; 072305HYDR ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: December 16, 2009 Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The applicant is proposing to conduct normal maintenance and repair on the North Boeing Bridge, which is used to transport Boeing Commercial aircraft to the test facilities at the Renton Municipal Airport. Location: 737 Logan Avenue N Comments: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION !FROM SHORIEiJNE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION FORM & DECISION DATE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE: LAND USE ACTION FILE NO.: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT MANAGER: OWNER/ APPLICANT: CONTACT: PROJECT LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEC-TWN-R: WATER BODY/WETLAND: December 14, 2009 LUA09-154, SME Cedar River N Bridge Repair Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner Boeing Corporation, 737 Logan Ave. N, Renton, WA 98055 Mark Clement, Boeing Company, 737 Logan Ave. N, Renton, WA 98055 The north bridge that connects parcel# 0723059001 to The Renton Municipal Airport. See attachment A NE quarter of Section 7 Township 23N Range 05E Cedar River and Lake Washington PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to conduct normal maintenance and repair on the North Boeing Bridge, which is used to transmit Boeing Commercial aircraft to the test facilities at the Renton Municipal Airport. This bridge crosses the Cedar River at its mouth, where the river enters Lake Washington. The applicant is proposing to complete three maintenance projects. First, the applicant is proposing to replace the timber cap beam as the existing treated-timber cap beam is rotting as a result of water seeping onto the top of the cap through the bridge expansion joint. This accumulated water has resulted in fungal decay of the timber cap beam. The replacement beam would be an ACZA-treated timber beam. Secondly, the applicant proposes to replace grout pads between H-piles and caps. The grout has corroded in a number places and needs DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION CERTIFICATE Of EXEMPTION !FROM SHORIEl!NE SUBSTANTIAL DIEVIElOPMENT EVALUATION FORM & DECISION DATE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE: LAND USE ACTION FILE NO.: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT MANAGER: OWNER/ APPLICANT: CONTACT: PROJECT LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEC-TWN-R: WATER BODY/WETLAND: December 16, 2009 LUA09-154, SME Cedar River N Bridge Repair Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner Boeing Corporation, 737 Logan Ave. N, Renton, WA 98055 Mark Clement, Boeing Company, 737 Logan Ave. N, Renton, WA 98055 The north bridge that connects parcel# 0723059001 to The Renton Municipal Airport. See attachment A NE quarter of Section 7 Township 23N Range 05E Cedar River and Lake Washington PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to conduct normal maintenance and repair on the North Boeing Bridge, which is used to transport Boeing Commercial aircraft to the test facilities at the Renton Municipal Airport. This bridge crosses the Cedar River at it's mouth, where the river enters Lake Washington. The applicant is proposing to complete three maintenance projects. First, the applicant is proposing to replace the timber cap beam as the existing treated-timber cap beam is rotting as a result of water seeping onto the top of the cap through the bridge expansion joint. This accumulated water has resulted in fungal decay of the timber cap beam. The replacement beam would be an ACZA-treated timber beam. Secondly, the applicant proposes to replace grout pads between H-piles and caps. The grout has corroded in a number places and needs City of Renton Deportment of Cornn & Economic Development Certificate of Exe. Jn from Shoreline Substantial Development Cedar River N Bridge Repair LUA09-154, SME DATE OF PERMIT: December 16, 2009 Page 2 of 3 replacement. Lastly, the applicant is proposing to replace old conduit clips because the supporting electrical conduits have corroded and require replacement. The proposed project would not require the placement of any structures or bridge components into the waters of the Cedar River or Lake Washington. Bridge maintenance activities beneath the bridge would be conducted from a barge or boat. The work is proposed to be completed during the next 2010 authorized work window for areas in the Cedar River (July 1-August 31) and should be completed in approximately 1-month. Because this work also requires a Section 10 permit from the Army Corps of Engineers a Biological Evaluation (BE) ofthe potential influence of the subject action on listed species in the project area, was prepared. This report was completed by AMEC Geomatrix, dated November 2009. The report concluded that Puget Sound Chinook salmon, Bull trout, and Puget Sound steelhead trout may occur in the project area. The BE makes the following findings: 1) The proposed action is likely to have no effect on the marbled murrelet; 2) No short-term or long-term adverse impacts to water quality are expected as a result of the proposed action; 3) There would be no project-related effects on existing shoreline conditions, sediment, substrate, bathymetry, or habitat diversity in the action area; 4) The proposed action would have no effect on refugia, flow or current patterns, macroalgae, benthic macroinvertebrate communities, or forage fish; 5) Any ambient noise associated with the project would be attributed to equipment used in bridge maintenance activities and is expected to be within the typical range of background ambient noise; 6) The proposed action may affect, but it is not likely to adversely affect Puget Sound Chinook salmon, Bull trout, and Puget Sound steel head trout; and 7) No cumulative effects are expected as a result of the proposed action. The BE report reaches these conclusions based on the project's scope, which includes no in-water work, and the proposal to utilize best management practices. In order to ensure there are minimal affects on the Class 1 waters and the species that could be within the vicinity of the project site, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant comply with the recommendation in the "Draft Biological Evaluation" prepared by AMEC Geomatrix, dated November 2009 and that in-water work shall not be conducted. It should also be noted that the subject project would be exempt from Environmental Review (SEPA) per WAC 197-11-800.3 Repair, remodeling and maintenance activities. This section states that "on fonds covered by water, only minor repair or replacement af structures may be exempt (examples include repair or replacement of piling, ramps, floats, or mooring buoys, or minor repair, alteration, or maintenance of docks)". An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby granted subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations included within the "Draft Biological Evaluation" prepared by AMCE Geomatrix, dated November 2009. 2. There shall be no in-water work conducted as a part of this project action. City of Renton Department of Comn & Economic Development Certificate of Exe. n from Shoreline Substantial Development Cedar River N Bridge Repair LUA09-154, SME DATE OF PERMIT: December 16, 2009 Page 3 of 3 The proposed project is hereby granted in accordance with RMC 4-9-190C.3 for the following reason(s): Pursuant to RMC 4-9-190.C.3 the normal maintenance or repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire or the elements shall not be considered substantial developments for the purposes of the Shoreline Master Program. a. "Normal maintenance" includes those usual acts to prevent a decline, lapse, or cessation from a lawfully established condition. b. "Normal repair" means to restore a development to a state comparable to its original condition, including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance, within a reasonable period after decay or partial destruction, except where repair causes substantial adverse effects to the shoreline resource or environment. The proposed development is consistent or inconsistent with: CONSISTENT xx N/A xx INCONSISTENT C. E. "Chip" Vincent, Planning Director Planning Division Attachments: A) Legal Description & Site Plan B) Neighborhood Map cc: Boeing Company, Owner/Applicant Mark Clement, Contact City of Renton Official File Policies of the Shoreline Management Act. The guidelines of the Department of Ecology where no Master Program has been finally approved or adapted by the Department. The City of Renton Shoreline Master Program. Cl) w z <( _J a.. a:: <( _J <( 0 a:: w ~ ~ 0 0 (!) z w 0 co PUGET SOUND POWER & UGHT COMPANY z "" is!~ ~c ~1 .... -... ........ I ! i II • I I I I I I I • r \-1 "-'. ') \, c cY _ M \:'If hoc:, o. Washington -Renton City of Rento Planning o· . . n IVIS1on Nov 2 4 zoo9 North 8th and Park Avenue North, Renton, WA 98055 Ot From Seattle i Boeing Em~loyees----!1,--0 Flying Associalion ; ---------~-·--t----------------- ' I I I -j----------- I I I I !f: C::, M44 2 Rivertech I __ ----,, __ Corpor.ate.C.ente.r_~ i I From Longacres Park Revised 10-07 o', @) t ATTACHMENT B Froml Bel!efue I 1.201 I Triton Tower Three 1-200 I Triton Tower Two I 0 Employee gates O AMS Turnstile gates ----Fence lines D Boeing property D General parking ~ Restricted parking @) Bus stop @ Helistop I I M ., ID Copyright 2007C The Boeing Company. All righ1s reserved. Check RequP.st for Non Vendor Refund o· ~eimbursement This form is used Of, Jr one time vendors. Please contact hvvOUnts Payable if you have any questions regarding one time vendors. Check will be included in the next scheduled A!P check run and mailed or released after Council approl'al. Check Request Info: Requestor 's name: UfM!1t5S(J, Oolhee- Mail address for check: 10J tt?3o-.n f-1:vl. JJ ~1Dh , WA °I B 0'5S Check amount: Date of request: 11j1y/oq Requestor 's department/division: CEO Account number(s) to charge: $ J oOO .oo ooo. 3LfS. 01, oo. 0007 I Reason for refund or reimbursement: c5{0A €nu i, on m enf tJJ 'fhD-ftd- fehid. *A roval Si nature: Date: Requestor 's Department Administrator, Divi ion Director or designee: *The person approving this check request must be an authorized signer. Q:IDAT A_ Center\Forms\Financc\2007 _Check Request for Non Vendor Refund or Reimbursement (print and till in) doc Requestor 's ext. #: Amount per account #: Ji oOO • "o I Print and Fill lri Fonn, July 2007 Printed: 12-14-2009 CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions !RECEIPT Permit#: LUA09-154 Payment Made: Receipt Number: Total Payment: 12/14/2009 11 :46 AM -1,000.00 Payee: Boeing Corporation Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review -1,000.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment REFUND Account Balances Trans Account Code 3021 5006 5007 5008 5009 5010 5011 5012 5013 5014 5015 5016 5017 5018 5019 5020 5021 5022 5024 5036 5909 5941 5954 5955 5998 303.000.00.345.85 000.345.81.00.0002 000.345.81.00.0003 000.345.81.00.0004 000.345.81.00.0006 000.345.81.00.0007 000.345.81.00.0008 000.345.81.00.0009 000.345.81.00.0010 000.345.81.00.0011 000.345.81.00.0012 000.345.81.00.0013 000.345.81.00.0014 000.345.81.00.0015 000.345.81.00.0016 000.345.81.00.0017 000.345.81.00.0018 000.345.81.00.0019 000.345.81.00.0024 000.345.81.00.0005 000.341.60.00.0024 000.341.50.00.0000 650.237.00.00.0000 000.05.519.90.42.l 000.231.70.00.0000 Description Park Mitigation Fee Annexation Fees Appeals/Waivers Binding Site/Short Plat Conditional Use Fees Environmental Review Prelirn/Tentative Plat Final Plat PUD Grading & Filling Fees Lot Line Adjustment Mobile Home Parks Rezone Routine Vegetation Mgmt Shoreline Subst Dev Site Plan Approval Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence Variance Fees Conditional Approval Fee Comprehensive Plan Amend Booklets/EIS/Copies Maps (Taxable) DO NOT USE -USE 3954 Postage Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 -1,000.00 Balance Due .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 R0905395 City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT City of Renton Planning Division NOV 2 4 2009 MASTER APPLICATIO PROPERTY OWNER($) TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 206 617- 2944 NAME: Boeing Corp. Mark.d.clement@boeina.com ADDRESS: 737 Lo_gan Ave n. PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME Cedar River North CITY: Renton ZIP: Bridge Repair Project 98055 PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206 617-2944) 737 Logan Ave n Renton WA 98055: APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Mark Clement KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): COMPANY (if applicable): Boeing 0723059001 Boeing , 072305HYDR waterway EXISTING LAND USE(S): Manufactoring ADDRESS: 737 Logan Ave n. PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Manufactoring CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: TELEPHONE NUMBER 206 617-2944 UCN PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CONTACT PERSON (if applicable): NA NAME: Mark Clement EXISTING ZONING Urban Center north 2 COMPANY (ii applicable): Boeing Co. PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): same as existing SITE AREA (in square feet): 6,618,761 sq. ft acres) ADDRESS: 737 Logan Ave n. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED:none CITY: Renton ZIP: SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: 98055 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): NA Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planning/masterapp.doc 10/05/09 JIEC'f INFORMATION (con · edl NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): NA NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE • .. I';~ :""'' I I J. •, ! i \ NEW PROJECT (if applicable): NA NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NA PROJECT VALUE:$ b77,000 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE'FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA D FLOOD HAZARD AREA 5000 __ sq.ft SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL D GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. BUILDINGS (if applicable): 0 HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL 0 SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES 5000 __ sq. ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if D WETLANDS sq. ft. applicable): NA LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY /Attach leaal descriotion on seoarate sheet with the followina information included) SITUATE IN THE -ne QUARTER OF SECTION 7_, TOWNSHIP _23n_, RANGE_5e_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. lYIPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. __ x_Site plan review 3. _x SEPA CHECKLIST 2. __ X Shoreline exemption 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ Billed_ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) fv'.l A Y I< C I e ('I) e N T , declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or~ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that /11At;/C ~ 7 /!M /J signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the ~ uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Jffe,---c-.,c__ _____ __c=-----'.L- .. ~ 1 fV ~--- ·~:;,···· Q.16limure of Owner/Representative) I ,J, k .. ~l;:, ~ ~ -r.,a• •• C. ~ TAR,,'!>"·.-.., r ~!,n ~ <I>•'-'' ' ••C) :-, ~ Bt..\C f ~ ~ --0 ~ ·1F'~ ··,§: ,,, w;s'(<~,,,,. ,N111,¢gnature of Owner/Representative) Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/planninglmasterapp.doc 2 I ;,'._ DESCRIPTION OF THE BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY RENTON PL.ANT FACILITY PARCEL I-80 . . CITY Of RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON •. The following described tract of land is the resultant consolidation of Record Title vested in the Boeing Company, a Delaware Corporation .and Puget Sound.Power g Light Company, a Massachusetts Corporation, covered in the Pioneer National Title Insurance Company, Limited Liability Reports Number A-253801, A-253802, A-253803, A-253804, Unit 13, dated January 11, through January 21, 1980. ALL BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE GRID MERIDIAN OF THE WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE. THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1 AND 3 IN SECTION 7; AND OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER Of SECTION 8., TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND OF C.H. ADSIT'S LAKE WASHINGTON PLAT AS RECORDED IN VOLUME B OF PLATS, PAGE 79, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND OF BLOCK C, THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL MAP OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS, AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 5927582; AND OF CERTAIN SHORE LANDS OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHOWN ON SHEETS 3 AND 4 OF THE MAP PREPARED BY UDO HESSE UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 156371; AND OF VACATED LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD (FORMERLY PARK STREET); AND OF THE ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. RAILWAY (FORMERLY NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY) RIGlfT-OF-WAY, ALL MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH MARGIN OF SIXTH AVENUE NORTH AND THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT N0.2 IN GOVERNMENT LOT 2 OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE WITH SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE NORTH 12°47'42" WEST 193.18 FEET; NORTH 00°22'54" EAST 454.50 FEET; NORTH 12°47'42" WEST 2394.32 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK C, SAID THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL MAP OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS; THENCE WITH THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID BLOCK C, NORTH 12°47 '42" WEST 264.08 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE CONTINUING WITH THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID BLOCK C, NORTH 84 °25' 26" EAST 1299. 96 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF, BEING ON THE INNER HARBOR LINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS IN SAID SECTION 7; THENCE WITH SAID INNER HARBOR LINE NORTH 46°52'27" EAST 977.56 FEET; -1 - • PARCEL 1-80 (Continued) T~ENCE WITHIN SAID SHORE LANDS SOUTH 43°06'56" EAST 932.91 FEET; SOUTH 46°53'04'' WEST 220.00 FEET; SOUTH 31°37'32" EAST 448.37 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID BURLINGTON NORTHERN, INC. RIGHT-OF-WAY IN GOVERNMENT LOT 2 OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE WITH SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY SOUTH 50°41 '48" WEST 248.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 12,769.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY WITH SAID CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0°10'00") 37.15 FEET TO THE PDINT·OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH'A· CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 6409.84 FEET; THENCE SOI/TH- I/ESTERLY ALONG SAID Cl),IPQUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0°20'00") 37 .29 -FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 4289.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0°30'00".) 37.44 rEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 3229.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0°40'00") 37.58 FEET TO THE POINT.OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 2593.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH- WESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0°50'00") 37.73 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 2169.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01°00'CO") 37.87 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 1867,13 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTPAL ANGLE OF 01 °10'00") 38.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 1639.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01°20'00") 38.16 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 1482.69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH- WESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE 140.74 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN FROM WHENCE THE CENTEP. OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 50°44'31" EAST; THENCE WITHIN SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY NORTH 53°32'36'' EAST 854.31 FEET; NORTH 49°53'02" EAST 606.40 FEET; SOUTH 44°22'57'' EAST 25.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH- EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID RJI.ILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY, SAID POINT BEING SOUTHEASTERLY ANO RADIAL FROM THE MAIN TRACK CENTERLINE SURVEY STATION 1068+00, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT FROM WHENCE THE CENTER BEARS NORTH 44°22'57" WEST 1639.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH SAID CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°24 '45") 11.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE RIGHT OF RADIUS 1867. 13 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°40'33") 22.02 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHENCE THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 43°17'39'' WEST, SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOlJTH\./ESTERLY RIGHT-OF-W.~Y OF PRIW.RY STATE HIGHWAY NO. l (SR 405) NORTH RENTON INTERCHANGE; -2- \ • PARCEL I-80 (Continued) CONTAINING 204.17 ACRES, OR 8,893,560 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO OWNERSHIP MAPS, RENTON PLANT FACILITIES, 1980 PROPERTY CONSOLIOATION, SHEETS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 OF 6 SHEETS . •• . . -4- Calculations 1 Drainage Report 2 • • PLANNING DIVISION . WAIVER (jf: SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS gi~v~i,i:ip~; At#hi\~~@r~i!{gJ~; >> Environmental Checklist 4 §Xi[tim~19pf~r~n~(ij~§i~?~ PPP¥)~ > Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Irrigation Plan 4 ~im~ ¢r4rt~ f#~~#ipr:~ M~P 1tj.~iA~Ph~ $;if? < Landscape Plan, Conceptual, Plan Reductions (PMTs)4 City of Renton , Planning Division NOV 2 4 2009 This requirement may be waived by: 1 . Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building PROJECT NAME: ~ I ~dctv e.1vc:, g( IL~ ee.p:11 ( . DATE ·7-~ /(; -(]CJ 4. Planning H:\CED\Data\Forms-Temptates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs.xls 06/09 PLANNING DIVISION WAIV£1 OF SUBMITTAL REQUICMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS //: i~Mp)i,$~/e§RM/I:§i!ij:r#.in'AA E iWAiV$i:i' 'niiooiFiEi:i ' H :~~ollliR-~M~NtsiH ' > : :ey::: : :: : 'n:n'av:' ' : · Plat Name Reservation 4 . Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4 Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations , AND 3 This requirement may be waived by: 1. · Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building PROJECT NAME: N Ced:tv ~u!e< Brie,~,, &pur DATE: 7 -/ (_,, -{! rt 4. Planning H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates1Sell-Help Handouls\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs.xls 06/09 ·- Project narrative City ot Renton Planning Division BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP RENTON WASINGTON Cedar River North Bridge Repair Project Repair 4 structural items on bridge NOV 2 4 2009 After reviewing a site report on the condition of the North Cedar River Bridge, which is used to transmit Boeing Commercial aircraft to the test facilities on the airport apron, Boeing has decide to repair 3 Structural items to extend the life of the bridge .. This is normal maintenance & repair of an existing bridge. 737 Logan avenue north Renton WA 98055 Adjacent to the shoreline, over the waterway at the North end of the Cedar River Adjacent to Boeing Renton plant site and Renton municipal Airport The North bridge area is 16,200 sq ft across the very north end of the Cedar River which empties in to Lake Washington Master use permit, Environmental Checklist, Shoreline exemption permit are the land use permits for the proposed projects. Zoning designation is Urban Center north 2 The North bridge connects the Boeing Commercial Airplane plant in Renton to the Renton Airport The Cedar River & Lake Washington are the Special site features Sandy silt loam is the soil type. Scope of work is: Repair 3 structural items 1) The timber cap beam The timber cap beam was found to have fungal decay. This was found to be at the edge of the connection of the bridge to the approach area. This Condition is suspected to be the result of water seeping onto the top of the cap by way of working its way down through the expansion joint. The repair is to replace the timber cap similar to past repairs on this section. • M •> • .... •-'• 2) Grout Pad between Pile and Cap, 2 inch x 14 inch square Grout is breaking up into pieces The repair would be to replace 3) Conduit Clips -Small clips supporting electrical conduit for lights Existing clips have corroded. Condition is suspected to be a result of environmental exposure Repair would be to replace the clips Access is by boat on the river, or by Boeing property on the right side of the bridge, or from the City of Renton airport on the left of the bridge The total cost is approx. $77,000 All above water work will be done during the time frame allowed by state and federal jurisdictions. The work is directly adjacent to the ordinary high water mark of the Cedar River or directly above it. The North area of the Cedar River has abundant variety of fish and wildlife No trees will be removed. No vegetation to be disturbed along the bank No views will be obstructed by the proposed project ./ ,. ,,. • CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION Boeing Commercial Airplane Group Renton, WA 'North Cedar River Bridge Repairs Proposed Construction Dates & Times: City of Renton Planning Division NOV 2 4 2009 In conformance with federal and state regulations, the proposed construction schedule will begin on July I, 2010 and complete on or prior to August 31, 2010. Unless specifically authorized under state and federal permits. The work will be accomplished during daylight hours, typically starting at 6:30AM and completing at 4:00PM, Monday through Friday. No late night hours are proposed for construction and hauling activities. Potential weekend hours may be required. Construction Description & Work Plan: The scope of the proposed construction includes: • Replacement of an approximately 12 ft. length of existing timber cap beam (11" x 14.125") is required from beneath the concrete bridge deck at the East approach. The removed portion will be replaced with a new timber cap beam of similar size. The proposed work for this activity will take place from a temporary floating construction platform/barge ( e.g. Flexifloat System) located beneath the bridge approach deck and temporarily secured to the bridge piles . Any temporary shoring that is required will be installed above the high water line in that location. Hydraulic jacks temporarily supported on the floating barge or . temporarily attached to the bridge piles will support the bridge deck while the old timber beam is removed. The existing beam may have to be removed in sections, depending on the condition of the beam. A debris boom will be secured around the work area to confine work-related debris to the work area. The old beam will be placed on the work barge for off-site disposal at an authorized disposal facility. The new cap beam will be AZCA-treated timber and will be lifted into place by jacks or by other means and fitted into the space vacated by the old beam. Any project-related debris entering the water will be removed and placed in disposal barrels for off-site disposal. The barge and hydraulic jacks supporting the bridge deck will be removed upon project completion. Removal and replacement of the timber cap beam is expected to require 10 days. • Replacement of three deteriorating grout pads on three H-piles will be replaced by hand. Work will be conducted from beneath the bridge by workers wearing waders or from temporary scaffolding erected beneath the bridge. Hydraulic jacks temporarily supported on the floating barge or temporarily attached to the bridge piles will support the bridge deck while the old grout pads are removed. Old grout will be removed with hand tools (e.g., jack • hammers, hammers, chisels, etc.). Tarps or scaffolding will be placed beneath the grout pads to be repaired to collect the old grout as it is removed and to collect any fresh grout that may drop during the replacement process. No fresh grout will be allowed to enter the water. As stated above, all project-related debris will be collected in waste barrels for off-site disposal. Removal and replacement of the grout pads is estimated to take 15 days. • Replacement of approximately 1 O corroded conduit clips along the West face of the East approach will be replaced with new clips. Work is expected to be done from the bridge deck and will not require any in-water work. The olds clips will be removed with hand tools (e.g., electric drills, screw drivers, and pliers) and the new clips will also be replaced with hand tools. The old conduit clips will not be allowed to enter the water and will be placed in waste barrels for off-site disposal. It is estimated that conduit clip replacement will require 2 days. Construction Mitigation Measures & Best Practices: All activities will begin with the implementation and installation of Best Management Practices (BMP) for Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC). These practices include: • Providing and installing a floating debris barrier boom in the water. The barrier boom will extend to contain any debris material that may be created from the above-mentioned construction operations along the entire length of the East approach as required. • All storm water drain inlets in and around the proposed construction operations and staging areas will be surrounded by oil absorbent padding to mitigate the potential of any hydraulic/fuel leakages emanating from construction machinery entering the watershed. • Spill kits, that include absorbent pads and spill booms, will be provided near the site. • All demolished materials and debris will be stockpiled in a lined waste container on site to prevent dust and sedimentation from migrating onto roadways. Additionally, the bridge deck and approach structures will frequently be cleared of dust and debris by Boeing operated sweeper vehicles. · • Contractor vehicles that are transporting materials to and from the site will be required to have tires washed prior to leaving the site. This will prevent dust and sedimentation from entering nearby roadways. Proposed HauUng & Transportation Routes: The proposed hauling and transportation routes, along with construction staging areas are noted on the aerial map attached in Figure I. ,. ·' Preliminary Traffic Control Plan: In order to alleviate traffic congestion on public roadways, all equipment and debris storage will be staged at the construction site throughout the duration of operations. Additional traffic control measures will be instituted as follows: • Non-motorized traffic that will be traveling under the main span of the North Cedar River Bridge will not be impacted as a result of the proposed operations beneath the East approach. A flagger and/or signage will be provided during construction operations to direct vehicular traffic entering the construction site and direct non-motorized watercraft traveling beneath the bridge span. • No cranes will be used during construction operations that impede the glide path of aircraft entering and/or leaving Renton Airport. As such, FAA notification would not be required. • All elevated construction machinery that is used and staged at the jobsite will be demarked with a safety flag/strobe at its highest point. :< E :l ;; g ::, ...; E ~ ;; ~ ":l 3. '- " I 0 ;a = Cl s1 " C, 0 = [€ :; .... ~ ~ ~ ::,., "' l<l Ro ~ !:; "' fl Cl ... 5' -c ~ ::,, (l ~ ~ I)} J; 0 ::; · I j ,---;,-,. " :,•. t; ~ . ./' I< ,. I 1 ' • ·::SC p '· t ; ~ t t f I 'I ,"\ ,h • ' ., .. ':~ ! • '. . . .. Jett·' i . tf ""·' SEPA CHECKLIST Prepared By Mark Clement clementmd Page 1 011/17/2009 • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Cedar River North Bridge Repair Project 2. Name of applicant The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707, M/S 1W-09 Seattle, WA 98124-2207 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Mark Clement Facilities Permits/Land use The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707, M/S 1W-09 Seattle, WA 98124-2207 Ph [206 617-2944] 4. Date checklist prepared: Nov, 2009 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): July 1 -August 31, 2010 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None planned at this time. Future maintenance on the bridge will be studied. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Biology Report, Stream report Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Washington State JARPA Permits ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remove fire line 1 11117/2009 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Federal: Corps of Engineers -Section 404 permit State of Washington: Dept. of Ecology -401 Water Quality Certification Dept of fish & wildlife -Hydraulic project approval King County: None known at this time City of Renton/Local: State Environmental Policy Act Review 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions tater in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) After reviewing the condition of the North Cedar River Bridge, Boeing has decide to repair 3 structural items, to extend the live of the bridge The bridge is used to transmit Boeing Commercial aircraft to the test facilities on the airport apron, 1) Timber Cap Beam -14 inches wide by 11 inches high -Repair is to replace the timber cap 2). Grout Pad between Pile and Cap -2 inch x 14 inch square grout pad. The repair would be to chip out and replace or provide different shim material. 3) Conduit Clips -Small clips supporting electrical conduit for lights Repair would be to replace the clips ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remove fire line 2 11/1712009 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Site address: 737 Logan ave north Renton, Washington Refer to Exhibit A, Vicinity Map; and Site Plan for project location. Refer to Exhibit B for Legal Description B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other ..... . Flat; b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1%; c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sandy silt loam d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Not known e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remove fire line 3 11/17/2009 None f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? No change, bridge is 100% impervious surface h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: No impacts to the earth 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During demolition, marine and construction equipment emissions in minimum quantities, no long term affect b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Mitigation measures will be implemented as required to meet or exceed all applicable standards as required by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency and the Department of Ecology. Additional potential mitigation measures to reduce emissions include ensuring that machines and equipment used during construction are well maintained. 3. Water ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remove fire line 4 11/17/2009 a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The work will be done over the Cedar River near the mouth of the river which flows into Lake Washington 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes over the Cedar River, see attached plans 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remove fire line 5 11/17/2009 industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable}, or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water runoff (including storm-water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water runoff will be collected in the existing plant's storm-water control system. No additional impervious surface or runoff will be created by the project. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No, see below d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: All storm water drain inlets in and around the proposed construction operations and staging areas will be surrounded by oil absorbent padding to mitigate the potential of any hydraulic/fuel leakages emanating from construction machinery entering the watershed. 4. Plants a. I . b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remove fire 1/ne 6 11/1712009 See Biological Evaluation attached with Project d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: See 2003 Boeing EIS. Birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site are listed below: Birds: Mammals: seagulls, crows, eagles, Blue heron none Fish: Coho salmon, Chinook salmon sockeye salmon steelhead and cutthroat trout, native char (bull trout) and long fin smelt b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Puget Sound Steelhead and their status are under ESA, the species is listed as "threatened," as are Puget Sound Chinook salmon and coastal/Puget Sound bull trout Please see Biological report submitted with this package c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Pacific Flyway; see 2003 Boeing EIS. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None, banks near bridge have native vegetation 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric, power b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remove fire line 7 11/17/2009 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None known 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Boeing Fire Department will respond to any water emergencies 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Temporary noise impacts during n and construction are anticipated. Construction projects of this type typically produce noise levels that range from 68 to 98 dba at 50 feet from the specific equipment. Contractor will only do between 6 am to 3:30 am 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Work to be done during daytime 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remove fire line 8 11/17/2009 The site is fully developed as an aircraft manufacturing and final assembly facility. Renton Airport on adjacent side b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. The Renton Plant is a large airplane manufacturing and final assembly facility, consisting of many buildings and ancillary uses. The project site is adjacent to the Renton plant. The City of Renton boathouse is adjacent to the site Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? UCN-2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? UCN-2 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban Center north 2 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Cedar River i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remove fire line 9 11/17/2009 I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal are compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: NA 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or /ow-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or /ow-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? N/A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remove fire 1/ne 10 11/17/2009 c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Cedar River shoreline trail and park are within the general area of the Renton Site. Kayak club Renton City Boathouse b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Kayakers, cancers maybe diverted to one side of bridge during construction window. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Construction can be phased to allow watercrafts to pass under bridge, on side or other. Boeing contractor will posts signs. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None have been identified on the project site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remove fire line 11 1111712009 If artifacts are uncovered, work in that area will be halted pending notification and response from appropriate agencies. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site has access to North 61h Street and Logan Avenue North. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes Metro. 150 yards c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? NA d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes, Renton Municipal Airport f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. None is anticipated. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remove fire line 12 11117/2009 None 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at.the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity, which might be needed. Electrical power for construction equipment C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. Understand that the lead agency is relyi~ ~ thJ,f1 to make its decision. Signature: ,~ Ch.A Mark D. Clement Date Submitted: _/....:/_-_L_"l_-_0 _1 _____ _ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remove fire line 13 11/17/2009 0 A From Seattle v'8shington -Renton North 8th and Park Avenue North, Renton, WA 98055 4 Fromj Bellevue 5 0 A Fl---------+-~--- B D E F From $ea_ttle --· 0 " " w ~ 00 z 0 • !;' < : +-S2NDST S3RDST-. $ 4TH ST c::::,H44 @) Rivertech I __ Corporate.Center I SW7TH ST I ~ I 00 w > < B C D 00 w > < E z " 0 • Hill Triton Tower Three E 0 Employee gates 0 AMS Turnstile gates ----Fence lines D Boeing property D General parking F D Restricted parking @) Bus stop ® Helistop I Copynght 2009o The Boeing Company. All f9lts reserved. OESCRI PTION OF THE BOEING COf,V,fERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY RENTON PLANT FACILITY PARCEL 1-80 . . CITY Of RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON •. The following described tract of land is the resultant consolidation of Record Title vested in the Boeing Company, a Delaware Corporation .and Puget Sound. Power & Light Company, a Massachusetts Corporation, covered in the Pioneer National Title Insurance Company, Limited Liability Reports Number A-253801, A-253802, A-253803, A-253804, Unit 13, dated January 11, through January 21 , 1980. ALL BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE GRID MERIDIAN Of THE WASHINGTON COORDINATE 'SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE. THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS l AND 3 IN SECTION 7; AND Of GOVERNMENT LOTS l, 2 ANO 3 AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY Of RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND OF C.H. ADSIT'S LAKE WASHINGTON PLAT AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 8 OF PLATS, PAGE 79, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND OF BLOCK C, THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL MAP OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS, AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 5927582; AND OF CERTAIN SHORE LANDS OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHOWN ON SHEETS 3 AND 4 OF THE MAP PREPARED BY UDO HESSE UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 156371; AND OF VACATED LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD (FORMERLY PARK STREET); AND OF THE ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. RAILWAY {FORMERLY NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY) RIGHT-OF-WAY, ALL MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH MARGIN OF SIXTH AVENUE NORTH AND THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CQf,V,fERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT N0.2 IN GOVERNMENT LOT 2 OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE WITH SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE NORTH 12°47'42" WEST 193.18 FEET; NORTH 00°22'54" EAST 454.50 FEET; NORTH 12°47'42'' WEST 2394.32 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK C, SAID THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL MAP OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS; THENCE WITH THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID BLOCK C, NORTH 12°47 '42" WEST 264.08 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE CONTINUING WITH THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID BLOCK C, NORTH 84 °25' 26" EAST 1299. 96 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF, BEING ON THE INNER HARBOR LINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS IN SAID SECTION 7; THENCE WITH SAID INNER HARBOR LINE NORTH 46°52'27" EAST 977.56 FEET; -1 - • • PARCEL 1-80 (Continued) T~ENCE WITHIN SAID SHORE LANDS SOUTH 43°06'56" EAST 932.91 FEET; SOUTH 46°53'04'' WEST 220.00 FEET; SOUTH 31°37'32" EAST 448.37 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID BURLINGTON NORTHERN, INC. RIGHT-OF-WAY IN GOVERNMENT LOT 2 OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE WITH SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY SOUTH 50°41 '48" WEST 248.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 12,769.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY WITH SAID CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0°10'00") 37 .15 FEET TO THE POINT' OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH'A· CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 6409.84 FEET; THENCE SO\/TH- WESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0°20'00") 37.29 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 4289.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE ( THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0°30' 00") 37.44 ~EET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 3229.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0°40'00") 37.58 FEET TO THE POINT.OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 2593.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH- WESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A ~NTRAL ANGLE OF 0°50'00") 37. 73 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 2169.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01°00'CO") 37.87 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 1867 ,.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTP.AL ANGLE OF 01°10'00") 38.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 1639.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01°20'00") 38.16 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 1482.69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH- WESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE 140.74 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN FROM WHENCE THE CENTEP. OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 50°44'31" EAST; THENCE WITHIN SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY NORTH 53°32'36'' EAST 854.31 FEET; NORTH 49°53'02" EAST 606.40 FEET; SOUTH 44°22 '57" EAST 25.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH- EASTERLY K<\RGIN OF SAID RJI.ILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY, SAID POINT BEING SOUTHEASTERLY ANO RADIAL FROM THE MAIN TRACK CENTERLINE .SURVEY STATION 1068+00, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT FROM WHENCE THE CENTER BEARS NORTH 44°22'57" WEST 1639.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH SAID CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°24'45") 11.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE RIGHT OF RADIUS 1867.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°40'33") 22.02 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHENCE THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 43°17'39'' WEST, SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PRll",,\RY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 ( SR 405) NORTH RENTON I NTERCKANGE; -2- \. \) • ...;.----... , \ ~\ ~. " ' ~-, • J ' . . . '-'--..:.... "--\. • BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLAI COMPANY A DIVISION OF THE BOEING COMPANY RENTON PLANT FACILITY PARCEL I-80 8,893,~60 SQUARE FEET 204.17 ACRES 100 300 0 / g;;.;;-., ,.. g I 00 . "9·. l!OC' I > 'C . ...:-.:..- ICAL[ 1 .. fHl CITY OF RENTON KING COUNTY, WASHING.TON ' ,• ·1··· ,t,G • ·. +' .. _.:;. .. ', ·;;r 4. ·.: ~ j 'l'ilLLAMETTE MERIDIAN T23N R5E !·80 ,, (% " ,0 1,,IHOTON NORTH(AN / : 1 , s•o; ••o•T o~. "".: I 0 • ! __ _,Cl,.,,'i I --... ----- • . . ' / • . . • " • > NW4, SW4, S(C. 8 • • n " " OIOO I •• • \ . ,.. Ci:. i ' Y!: ..... : 3 ..... sc, • •OIT• ff" ITDIIT i • \ PARCEL I-80 (Continued) CONTAINING 204.17 ACRES, OR 8,893,560 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO OWNERSHIP MAPS, RENTON PLANT FACILITIES, 1980 PROPERTY CONSOLIDATION, SHEETS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 OF 6 SHEETS . .. . . -4- Printed: 11-24-2009 Payment Made: .ITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA09-154 City of Renton Planning Division NOV 2 4 zoog Receipt Number: R0905132 Total Payment: 11/24/2009 10:02 AM 1,000.00 Payee: Boeing Bill, Mark Clement 96327 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 1,000.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment BILL 96327 1,000.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000. 345. 81. 00. 0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE -USE 3954 5955 000.05.519.90.42.l Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .oo .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 . 00 .00 .00 .00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I November 13, 2009 Project 14071.001 Mr. Mark Clement, Permit Administrator The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707, MC 1W-09 Seattle, WA 98124-2207 Subject: Standard Stream Study Narrative Dear Mark: Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington City of Renton Planning Division NOV 2 4 2009 Renton Municipal Code (RMC) 4-8-120D requires that a standard lake or stream study be prepared and submitted to the City of Renton as part of the permitting process. The study includes preparation of a site map and a narrative describing the habitat attributes associated with the site. This letter constitutes the narrative describing the habitat attributes of the proposed project site and includes the following information: • The stream or lake classification as recorded in the City of Renton Water Class Map in RMC 4-3-050Q4 or RMC 4-3-090; • The vegetative cover of the site, including the stream or lake, banks, riparian area, wetland areas, and flood hazard areas extending 100 feet upstream and downstream from the property line; • The ecological functions currently provided by the stream/lake and existing riparian area; • Observed or reported fish and wildlife that make use of the area including, but not limited to, salmonids, mammals, and bird nesting, breeding, and feeding/foraging areas; and • Measures to protect trees, as defined per RMC 4-11-200, and vegetation (Ord. 5137, 4-25-2005). AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. (AMEC), has prepared this stream study in accordance with RMC 4-8- 120D for Boeing's proposed Renton Plant North Cedar Bridge Maintenance project. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Boeing Company (Boeing) proposes to conduct routine maintenance activities on a bridge spanning the Cedar River (North Cedar Bridge) at its confluence with Lake Washington (Figure 1; Attachment A -Photo 1 ). Boeing uses the bridge to transport commercial jet aircraft (primary 737s) from its assembly plant to the Renton Municipal Airport, which Boeing uses to launch and land aircraft. The biological evaluation (BE) prepared for Section 7 consultation under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for this project (Attachment B) provides a detailed AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. 3500 188th Street SW, Suite 600 Lynnwood, Washington USA 98037 ·4 763 Tel (425) 921-4000 Fax (425) 921-4040 www.amecgeomatrixinc.com 1~~1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Mark Clement The Boeing Company November 13, 2009 Page2 description of the proposed project, as well as figures depicting existing bridge conditions and proposed maintenance activities. 2.0 STREAM CLASSIFICATION According to RMC 4-3-05004 (City of Renton Water Class Map), the Cedar River in the vicinity of the project site is a Class 1 water. 3.0 VEGETATIVE COVER Two AMEC biologists (Bob Stuart, fisheries biologist, and Kerrie McArthur, wetlands biologist) conducted a site survey on Tuesday, August 25, 2009, to assess habitat conditions and vegetative cover along the Cedar River and Lake Washington shoreline within 100 feet of the project site. The project site is defined as the portion of the bridge spanning the Cedar River at its confluence with Lake Washington. Proposed maintenance activities are to be conducted only on the portion of the bridge spanning the river and not on the wider bridge aprons on each bank of the Cedar River (Figure 1; Attachment A -Photo 1 ). The North Cedar Bridge (Attachment A -Photos 1 and 2) is a concrete bridge spanning the Cedar River at its mouth (Attachment A -Photo 3). The river is approximately 136 feet wide where it enters Lake Washington. The area immediately east of the bridge is property owned by The Boeing Company and consists primarily of paved roadways, parking lots, taxiways, manufacturing facilities, and administrative offices (Figure 1 ). The Renton Municipal Airport is located immediately west of the bridge and consists primarily of concrete and asphalt surface used for launching and landing commercial and recreational aircraft (Figure 1 ). A vegetation survey was conducted along each bank of the Cedar River, extending 100 feet upstream of the bridge deck. Because the bridge is located at the mouth of the Cedar River where it enters Lake Washington, the vegetation survey was also conducted along the shoreline of Lake Washington 100 feet east and west of the bridge (Figure 2; Attachment A -Photo 3). The western bank of the Cedar River within 100 feet of the bridge consists of a steel-pile and timber-lagging bulkhead, above which is located a steep bank approximately 15 feet wide (Attachment A -Photos 4 and 5). Riparian vegetation along the western bank consists primarily of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), butterfly bush (Buddleia davidi1), reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), and common tansy (Tanacetum vulgare). All of these species area listed as noxious weeds by King County. A small, unidentified species of willow ( Salix spp.) was also growing along the west bank along with various, unidentified grasses. The riparian area is bordered to the west by a narrow strip of lawn, beyond which is the Renton Municipal Airport (Figure 2; Attachment A -Photo 1 ). The eastern bank of the Cedar River within 100 feet of the bridge is similar to that described for the western bank, consisting of a steel-pile and timber-lagging bulkhead, above which is located I I I I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I ~ Mr. Mark Clement The Boeing Company November 13, 2009 Page 3 a steep bank approximately 20 feet wide (Attachment A -Photo 6). South of the bridge and immediately adjacent to the Cedar River is the Cedar River Trail Park (Attachment A -Photo 7). A portion of the riparian area along the eastern bank of the river within 100 feet of the bridge appears to have been landscaped with native vegetation consisting of Nootka rose (Rosa nutkana), redosier dogwood (Cornus sericea), and mock orange (Philadelphus /ewisi1). Additionally, the same noxious weeds found on the western bank also occurred on the eastern bank, including Himalayan blackberry, common tansy, and reed canarygrass. A number of unidentified grasses were also observed on the eastern bank. Immediately east of the eastern bank is the Cedar Trail Park, consisting of a vegetated strip immediately adjacent to the riparian area, a sidewalk, and driveway. The vegetated strip beyond 100 feet south of the bridge is planted with larger trees (trunks 2!10 inches in diameter) that appeared to be bigleaf maples (Acer macrophyllum) (Figure 2; Attachment A-Photo 7). The Boeing facility is located to the east of the park (Figure 1 ). The Lake Washington shoreline east and west of the North Cedar Bridge is steep, a portion of which on each side of the bridge consists of a sheet-pile bulkhead and riprap (Attachment A - Photos 8, 9, and 1 O; Attachment B -draft BE). The shoreline west of the bridge and adjacent to the Renton Municipal Airport consists primarily of Himalayan blackberry and butterfly bush, along with some unidentified grasses. Immediately south and adjacent to the western shoreline is a narrow strip of maintained lawn (approximately 10 to 15 feet wide}, beyond which is the asphalt runway of the Renton Municipal Airport. Vegetation along the Lake Washington shoreline east of the bridge is dominated by Himalayan blackberry, reed canarygrass, and butterfly bush. Japanese knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum) and unidentified grasses were also observed along the shoreline east of the bridge. No trees with trunks greater than or equal to 1 O inches in diameter are located within 100 feet of the property line of the proposed project. Aquatic vegetation observed during the survey included Canada waterweed (Elodea canadensis), white-stemmed pondweed (Potamogeton praelongus), curly leaf pondweed (Potamogeton crispus), and common duckweed (Lemna minor). 4.0 ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION In addition to providing habitat for birds and other wildlife, riparian habitats have important ecological functions. Healthy riparian vegetation protects banks from erosion, influences in channel aquatic habitats, maintains favorable water temperature for fish through shading, filters runoff, and provides nutrients. Riparian vegetation creates meanders, increases habitat complexity, and can protect against scour during severe storm events. Riparian habitats link I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Mark Clement The Boeing Company November 13, 2009 Page4 upland and aquatic habitats. Upland habitats have a critical role in watershed function and affect riparian and aquatic habitats, particularly in drier, low-elevation sites. The riparian areas along the banks of the Cedar River in the project area are dominated by invasive species, as discussed in Section 3.0, above. The primary ecological functions provided by riparian vegetation at the project site include: • Nesting and forage habitat for birds and small mammals, • Input of terrestrial insects from overhanging vegetation, • Input of allochthonous organic matter (via leaf fall), • Some erosion control, and • Limited habitat complexity. The lower Cedar River in the project area has been channelized and substantially altered, so that there is a limited riparian area that cannot provide all of the potential ecological functions of an unaltered habitat. Because small shrubs dominate the riparian vegetation and the lack of large trees, there is very limited, if any, shading provided by the riparian vegetation. Both banks of the river in the project area are bulkheaded, so there is no potential for the creation of meanders or off-channel habitat. Because of extensive development along both banks of the river in the project area (Boeing to the east and the Renton Municipal Airport to the west), there is little, if any, transition between riparian and upland habitats. Similarly, riparian vegetation along the shoreline of Lake Washington in the project vicinity is dominated by invasive plant species, so that ecological functions are very limited, as described above. Large woody debris deposited in the delta formed by the Cedar River (Attachment A - Photo 11) may provide some nursery and refugia habitat for juvenile salmonids; however, water depths in the nearshore area of the project site are very shallow (S4 feet), likely resulting in warming of nearshore areas by solar radiation. 5.0 FISH AND WILDLIFE This section addresses fish and wildlife species that may use the project vicinity. 5.1 Mammals No mammals or signs of mammal use were observed during the site visit. Given the level of development in the project area, it is likely that only small mammals such as squirrels, mice, rats, voles, moles, raccoons, opossums, muskrats, and river otters use the riparian areas along the Cedar River and the Lake Washington shoreline within 100 feet of the project area. Richter and Azous (1997), conducting small-mammal surveys in a wetland along the lower Cedar River, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Mark Clement The Boeing Company November 13, 2009 Page 5 reported 13 species of mammals (Table 1). These, as well as other small mammals common to the Puget lowlands, may occur in the project vicinity. 5.2 Birds Several bird species were observed during the site visit, including American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) America robin (Turdus migratorius), European starling (Sturnus vulgaris), Canada goose (Bran/a Canadensis), domestic-wild goose hybrids, mallard duck (Anas platyrhynchus), common merganser (Mergus merganser), and great blue heron (Ardea herodias). Richter and Azous (1997) conducted bird surveys in a wetland of the lower Cedar River between late May and mid-June in 1988, 1989, 1991 1992, and 1995 to determine distribution and relative abundance. They reported 58 species of birds (Table 2). It is likely that these, as well as other species of birds common to the Puget lowlands, nest or forage in the project vicinity. 5.3 Amphibians and Reptiles No amphibians or reptiles were observed during the site visit; however, it is likely that amphibian (e.g., Anurans) and reptile species (e.g., turtles) found in the Lake Washington basin may use the areas within the site vicinity. Richter and Azous (1997) reported the occurrence of six amphibian species in the lower Cedar River: • Ensatina (Ensatina eschscholtzil), • Long-toed salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylus), • Northwestern salamander (A. gracile), • Pacific tree frog (Pseudoacris regil/a), • Red-legged frog (Rana aurora), and • Western red-backed salamander (Plethodon vehiculum). No information was located listing reptile species occurring in the lower Cedar River in the project vicinity; however, reptiles listed for King County (King County, 2008) that could occur in the project area include: • Common garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis), • Northern alligator lizard (Elgaria coerulea), • Northwestern garter snake (Thamnophis ordinoides), • Painted turtle (Chrysemys picta), • Rubber boa (Charina bottae), • Slider (Trachemys scripta), I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I E I I I Mr. Mark Clement The Boeing Company November 13, 2009 Page 6 • Western fence lizard !.Sce/oporus occidentalisl, and • Western terrestrial garter snake (Thamnophis elegans). 5.4 Fish No fish were observed during the site visit. The Lake Washington system, including the project area, hosts many fish species, including five salmonid species: Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), coho salmon (0. kisutch), sockeye/kokanee salmon (0. nerka), coastal cutthroat trout (0. clarki clark1), and steelhead/rainbow trout (0. mykiss). Anadromous forms of each of these species are present, so individuals are present in the lake both as adults during migrations to spawning grounds and as juveniles. Sockeye are known to spawn along some beaches of the lake while there are unconfirmed reports of Chinook spawning in littoral areas of the lake (Kerwin, 2001). All of these species occur in the project area seasonally. Nonanadromous forms of winter steelhead (rainbow trout), sockeye (kokanee), and cutthroat trout also occur in the lake. Resident rainbow trout spend their entire life in Lake Washington. The resident rainbow trout population was sustained with hatchery plants because they rarely successfully reproduce in Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 8; however, releases of hatchery rainbow trout have been all but eliminated. Nonanadromous coastal cutthroat trout also occur in Lake Washington and are much more abundant than the anadromous form. Kokanee salmon is the freshwater, resident form of 0. nerka. Some progeny from the parents of anadromous sockeye may also remain in Lake Washington for all or a portion of their lives (resident/anadromous sockeye) (Kerwin, 2001 ). The largest single population of adfluvial bull trout ( Salvelinus confluentus) in western Washington is found above Cedar Falls in the upper Cedar River watershed. It is believed that a small number of bull trout pass through the reservoir and downstream hydroelectric facilities to the river reaches below Cedar Falls. However, it is apparently not sufficient to support the establishment of bull trout populations under the current ecological conditions (Corps, 2002). Native char, presumably bull trout, have been observed in the fish ladder viewing pool at the Hiram M. Chittenden Locks as recently as 1997, while isolated reports of native char being caught in or around Lake Washington occur every few years. A large juvenile char, again, presumably a bull trout (-250 mm, 3 year old), was caught in the lower Cedar River in July 1998. An adult char was also caught in the lower Cedar River in April of 1993 (Corps, 2002). Based on this information, occurrence of bull trout in the project area is expected to be extremely limited, if they occur at all. Species endemic to the Lake Washington system include the northern pike minnow (Ptychocheilus oregonensis), peamouth (Mylocheilus caurinus), sculpins (Cottus spp.), and longfin smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys) (Weitkamp et al., 2000; Wydoski and Whitney, 2003). Twenty-four non-native fish species (Table 3) have been identified in Lake Washington. A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I Mr. Mark Clement The Boeing Company November 13, 2009 Page 7 number of these species are now believed to be no longer present in the system. Some of these species are known to prey on juvenile salmon (e.g., smallmouth bass) while others are potential competitors with juvenile salmonids for food (Kerwin, 2001). 6.0 MEASURES TO PROTECT TREES AND VEGETATION The proposed project will involve routine maintenance activities of the bridge deck crossing the Cedar River at its confluence with Lake Washington. All work will be done from the bridge deck, from work barges in the river beneath the bridge, or from areas above the ordinary high water mark. No work will be conducted in or on riparian areas, nor will access to the work area require crossing riparian areas. No direct or indirect impacts to riparian vegetation or trees will result from the proposed action; therefore, no measures to protect vegetation or trees have been incorporated into the proposed work plan. Should you have any questions or comments, please call me at (425) 921-4024 or email me at bob.stuart@amec.com. Sincerely yours, AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. Robert E. Stuart, FP-C Senior Fisheries Scientist Direct Tel.: (425) 921-4024 Direct Fax: (425) 921-4040 E-mail: bob.stuart@amec.com res p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permittinglrepo~s\streamstudylbridgemaintstreams_ 111309.doc Attachments: Tables 1, 2, and 3 Figures 1 and 2 Attachment A -Site Photos Attachment B -Draft Biological Evaluation I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •• I I I I I I I I I Mr. Mark Clement The Boeing Company November 13, 2009 Page 8 7.0 REFERENCES Corps (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers), 2002, Montlake Cut Slope Stabilization Project Environmental Assessment Biological Evaluation -Lake Washington Ship Canal, Seattle, Washington: Corps, Seattle District, Seattle, Washington. Kerwin, J., 2001, Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Limiting Factors Report for the Cedar- Sammamish Basin (Water Resource Inventory Area 8): Washington Conservation Commission, Olympia. King County, 2008, King County Biodiversity Report 2008: King County, Seattle, Washington, http://www.kingcounty.gov/environmenVanimalsAndPlants/biodiversity/king-county- biodiversity-report.aspx (accessed September 1, 2009). Richter, K.O., and Azous, A. L., 1997, Amphibian distribution, abundance, and habitat use, in Azous, A.L., and Horner, R.R. (eds.), Wetlands and Urbanization -Implications for the Future, Final Report: Puget Sound Wetlands and Stormwater Management Research Program, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, King County Water and Land Resources Division, Seattle, Washington, and University of Washington, Seattle, http://your.ki ngcou nty. gov /dnrp/library /archive-docu ments/wlr/wetlands-urban ization- report/wet-rept. pdf (accessed September 1, 2009). Weitkamp, D.E., Ruggerone, G.T., Sacha, L., Howell, J., and Bachen, B., 2000, Factors Affecting Chinook Populations -Background Report: City of Seattle, Seattle, Washington. Wydoski, R.S., and Whitney, R.R., 2003, Inland Fishes of Washington: American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, and University of Washington Press, Seattle. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I· I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE 1 SMALL-MAMMALS REPORTED TO OCCUR ALONG THE LOWER CEDAR RIVER' Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Species (Common Name) Creeping vole Montane shrew Deer mouse Shrew-mole Ermine Southern red-backed vole Forest deer mouse Townsend's chipmunk Long-tailed vole Trowbridge's shrew Marsh shrew Vagrant shrew Masked shrew Note/s\ 1. Source: Richter and Azous, 1997. Richter, K.O., and Azous, A. L., 1997, Amphibian distribution, abundance, and habitat use, in Azous, A.L., and Horner, R. R. (eds.), Wetlands and Urbanization -Implications for the Future, Final Report: Puget Sound Wetlands and Stormwater Management Research Program, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, King County Water and Land Resources Division, Seattle, Washington, and University of Washington, Seattle, http://your.kingcounty.gov/ dnrp/library/archive-documents/wlr/wetlands- urbanization-report/wet-rept.pdf (accessed September 1, 2009). P:\BOEING RENTON\ 14071-001 Bridge Maintenance Permitting\Reports\StreamStudy\ Tbls _FigslBridgeMaintStream _Ibis.doc AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Note(sl TABLE 2 BIRDS REPORTED TO OCCUR ALONG THE LOWER CEDAR' Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Species (Common Name) American crow Northern nvnmv owl American goldfinch Orange-crowned warbler American robin Pine siskin Black-caooed chickadee Pacific-slope flycatcher Belted kinqfisher Purple finch Bewick's wren Red-breasted nuthatch Brown-headed cow bird Red-breasted sapsucker Black-headed qrosbeak Red crossbill Brewer's blackbird Red-eved vireo Brown creeoer Rufous-sided towhee Black-throated arav warbler Ruffed arouse Bushtit Rubv-crowned kinglet Chestnut-backed chickadee Red-winqed blackbird Cedar waxwina Sora Cooper's hawk Sonq sparrow Common raven Sharo-shinned hawk Common yellow throat Steller's jay Dark-eved iunco Swainson's thrush Downy woodpecker Townsend's warbler European starlinq Vaux's swift Evenina arosbeak Violet-areen swallow Fox sparrow Virginia rail Great blue heron Warblinq vireo Golden-crowned kinqlet Western tanaqer Hairv woodpecker Willow flycatcher Hermit thrush Wilson's warbler Marsh wren Winter wren Macqillivray's warbler Wood duck Northern flicker Yellow warbler 1. Source: Richter and Azous, 1997. Richter, K.O., and Azous, A. L., 1997, Amphibian distribution, abundance, and habitat use, in Azous. A.L., and Horner, R. R. (eds.), Wetlands and Urbanization -Implications for the Future, Final Report: Puget Sound Wetlands and Stormwater Management Research Program, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, King County Water and Land Resources Division, Seattle, Washington, and University of Washington, Seattle, http://your.kingcounty.gov/ dnrp/library/archive-documents/wlr/wetlands- urbanization-report/wet-rept.pdf (accessed September 1, 2009). P:IBOEING RENTON\14071.001 Bridge Main1enance Permitting\ReportslS1reamStudy\Tbls_Figs\BridgeMain\Stream_tbls.doc AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Ir I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE 3 NON-NATIVE FISH SPECIES INTRODUCED INTO THE LAKE WASHINGTON/LAKE UNION SYSTEM' Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance (Boeing Company} Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 Renton, Washington Common Name Scientific Name Status American shad Alosa sanidissima Uncommon stravs Atlantic salmon Sa/mo salar Can exceed 1,000 oer vear Black bullhead lctalurus me/as Extinct Black crannie Pomoxis niaromaculatus Common Blueaill Lenomis macrocheilus Common Brook trout Sa/velinus fontinalis Rarelv cauaht Brown bullhead lctalurus nebu/osus Rare, mav be extinct Brown trout Sa/mo trutta No observed reoroduction Channel catfish lctalurus nunctatus Rarelv cauaht Cherru salmon Oncorhvnchus masou Extinct Common care C"nrinus caroio Abundant Fathead minnow Pimenha/es notatus Unknown Goldfish Carassius auratus Intermittent Grass earn Ctenooharenaodon idella Trio loids onlv Lake trout Sa/velinus namavcush Extinct Lake whitefish Coreaonus cluneaformis Extinct Laroemouth bass Microoterus sa/moides Common Pumnkinseed sunfish Lenomis oibbosus Abundant Smallmouth bass Micronterus do/omieui Common Tench Tinca tinca Abundant Warmouth Lenomis aulosus No observed reoroduction Weather loach Misnurnus annil/icaudatus No observed reoroduction White crannie Pomoxis annu/aris Uncommon Yellow oerch Perea flavescens Abundant Note(s) 1. Source: Kerwin, 2001. Kerwin, J., 2001, Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Limiting Factors Report for the Cedar-Sammamish Basin (Water Resource Inventory Area 8): Washington Conservation Commission, Olympia. P:\BOEtNG RENTON\ 14071-001 Bridge Maintenance Permitting\Reports\StreamStudy\Tbls_Figs\BridgeMaintStream _ Ibis.doc AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. Page 1 of 1 I 11 1' I I I I I I a I I I I I I I I I I • I I I ,I I I I I ATIACHMENTA Site Photographs I I I I I I I I I I I I I E I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Photo 1 Photo 2 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Aerial view of bridge at mouth of Cedar River r· I ,.-,- Looking north toward bridge at mouth of Cedar River (photo taken from east bank) AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. \\lyn-fs1\projectf$\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reports\streamstudy\attactimentlfieldphotos_ 110909.doc A-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I E I ti I I I I I I I Photo 3 Photo 4 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington · .. : .... :.,...:--c.. ' Looking at timber bulkhead along west bank of Cedar River AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. \1Jyn-fs1 \projectf$\boeing renton\ 14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reportslstreamstudy\attachment\fieldphotos _ 11 0909.doc A-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I E B I I I I I Photo 5 Photo 6 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Looking at west bank of Cedar River from bridge deck (Renton Municipal Airport in background) Looking at east bank of Cedar River from bridge deck (note timber bulkhead) AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. \\lyn-fs 1 \projectf$\boeing renton\ 14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reports\streamstudy\attachmentlfieldphotos ~ 110909.doc A-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Photo 7 Photo 8 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Cedar River Trail Park located on east bank of Cedar River south of project site Lake Washington shoreline west of bridge apron (Renton Municipal Airport runway at center left) AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. \\lyn-fs 1 lprojeclf$\boeing renton\ 14071-001 bridge maintenance permittingl/eports\streamstudy\attachmentlfieldphotos_ 110909.doc A-4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I E I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Photo 9 Photo 10 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington -. Lake Washington shoreline west of bridge apron .,. . ' ·-~ '""'.: _,.. ·-.-~ -" ~. ~ -.:_ -~·· ·., ,_,c.: •• . ~· ~ - . ·"\,:,.:._ ...... -.-. Lake Washington shoreline east of bridge apron .. -., -~ ;;-~ ~ \'.:_ ·; . AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. \llyn-fs1\projeclf$\boeing renton\ 14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reportslstreamstudy\attactiment\fieldphotos_ 110909.doc A-5 I I I E I I I E I II [j I I I H I I I I I I I I I I I SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington ---·-. ---·---------·---------~ • t,.; ~ ·• Photo 11 Large woody debris in Lake Washington at mouth of Cedar River (bridge at center left) AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. \\lyn-fs 1 lprojectt$\boeing rentonl 14071-001 bridge maintenance permittinglreports\s\reamstudy\atlachmentlfieldphotos _ 110909.doc A-6 I I I I I I I I I I I f I I I I I I I I I I I I i i I I I ATTACHMENT B Draft Biological Evaluation I I! I I' 1f ,r 11 11 ,r ,1. I" I I 1· I I· I I· I I· I I .I I I I City of Renton Planning Division DRAFT BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS,2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Submitted to: The Boeing Company, Seattle, WA Submitted by: AMEC Geomatrix, Inc., Lynnwood, WA November 2009 Project 14071.001 NOV 2 4 2009 1f I I; I I I E I i f I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 6.0 EFFECTS OF THE ACTION ON LISTED SPECIES AND THEIR CRITICAL HABITATS ...................................................................................... 20 6.1 PUGET SOUND CHINOOK SALMON ....................................................................... 20 6.1.1 Noise ....................................................................................... 20 6.1.2 Water Quality ....................................................................................... 21 6.1.3 Effects Determination ............................................................................ 22 6.1.4 Effects on Critical Habitat ...................................................................... 22 6.2 PUGET SOUND/COASTAL BULL TROUT ............................................................... 23 6.2.1 Effects Determination ............................................................................ 23 6.2.2 Effects on Critical Habitat ...................................................................... 23 6.3 PUGET SOUND STEELHEAD TROUT ...................................................................... 24 6.3.1 Effects Determination ............................................................................ 24 6.3.2 Effects on Critical Habitat ...................................................................... 24 7.0 INTERRELATED/INTERDEPENDENT ACTIONS AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ..... 25 8.0 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 26 9.0 REFERENCES........................................................................... . ..................... 27 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4 Sheet 5 Sheet 6 Sheet 7 Sheet 8 Sheet 9 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D TABLES ESA-Listed Species Potentially Occurring in the Action Area Adult Escapement for Lake Washington Cedar River Chinook and Winter Steelhead Summary of Effects Determinations for Listed Species and Their Critical Habitats in the Action Area FIGURES (Sheets) Vicinity Map Existing Conditions Plan View Existing Conditions Detailed Plan View Existing Conditions Cross Sectional View Existing Conditions Cross Sectional Detail View Proposed Maintenance Tasks Plan View Proposed Maintenance Tasks Detailed Plan View Proposed Maintenance Tasks Cross Sectional View Proposed Maintenance Tasks Cross Sectional View APPENDICES Species Lists Project Photographs Species Life Histories Essential Fish Habitat Assessment AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p·\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permittinglreportslbelbridgemaintbe_ 111309.doc ii 1! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1.0 DRAFT BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington INTRODUCTION Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) requires that actions of federal agencies should be "not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any (listed) species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of habitat of such species." Issuance of permits by federal agencies falls under this requirement. The Boeing Company (Boeing) is applying for a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to conduct routine maintenance on a bridge crossing the Cedar River at its confluence with Lake Washington (Sheet 1 ). Because this work requires a Section 10 permit from the Corps, it qualifies as an action by a federal agency, and must comply with Section 7 of the ESA. Under ESA Section 7(c), the Corps is required to produce a biological evaluation (BE) of the potential influence of its action (issuing the permit) on listed species or their critical habitat. To help the Corps evaluate the potential effects of the proposed project on listed species, Boeing has prepared this BE. To determine if listed species or their critical habitat are in the vicinity of the proposed project, AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. (AMEC), consulted the Websites of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA- Fisheries), Northwest Region (2009) (http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Species-Lists.cfm) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_public/pub/ statelistinglndividual.jsp?state=WA&status=listed). Based on information from these websites and data from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) database (WDFW, 2009) (Appendix A), the following listed species may occur in the project area and are therefore addressed in this BE: • Puget Sound Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), listed as threatened in 1999; • Bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), listed as threatened in December 1999; and • Puget Sound steelhead trout (0. mykiss), listed as threatened in May 2007. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boemg renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance penmtting\reportslbelbridgemaintbe_ 111309.doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1· I· I I I I I 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project area is located at the mouth of the Cedar River along the shoreline at the south end of Lake Washington at Township 23N, Range SE, Section 7 (Sheet 1). Photographs of the project area are provided in Appendix B. The proposed project will entail performing routine maintenance of a bridge crossing the Cedar River near its confluence with Lake Washington (Sheets 2,3, 4, and 5; Appendix B -Photos 1 and 2). Boeing uses the bridge to transport commercial aircraft (primarily 737s) from Boeing's manufacturing facility to the Renton Municipal Airport, where aircraft take off and land as part of Boeing's flight test procedures. The bridge was constructed in 1943 (Appendix B -Photo 3). The bridge deck is made of poured concrete supported by steel piles (Sheets 4 and 5; Appendix B -Photo 4). 2.1 PROJECT ELEMENTS The primary elements of the proposed project are: • Replacement of a timber cap beam (14-inch X 11-inch) (Sheets 6, 7, and 8 and Appendix B -Photos 5 and 7) -The existing treated-timber cap beam is rotting as a result of water seeping onto the top of the cap through the bridge expansion joint. The accumulated water has resulted in fungal decay of the timber cap beam. The existing beam will need to be removed and replaced with a new ACZA-treated timber beam. • Replace grout pads between H-piles and cap (Figures 6, 7, and 9 and Appendix B - Photo 6) -Grout in a number of grout pads between the H-piles and cap has corroded and needs replacement. The old grout pads will need to be removed and replaced. o Replace conduit clips (Sheets 6, 7, and 8 and Photo 8) -Existing clips supporting electrical conduits have corroded and require replacement. Old clips will be removed and replaced with new conduit clips. The project will not require the placement of any structures or bridge components into the waters of the Cedar River or Lake Washington. Bridge maintenance activities beneath the bridge will be done from a barge or boat. 2.2 CONSTRUCTION TIMING The project is proposed to begin during the next (2010) authorized work window for areas in the Cedar River (July 1 to August 31). Boeing estimates that the project will be completed in approximately one month. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reports\be\bridgemaintbe_ 111309 doc 2 11 ! I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I· I I I I I I I I I 2.3 CONSTRUCTION METHODS All proposed work will occur on the east bridge apron (Sheets 6 and 7). Construction methods for each project element are described below: • Replacement of timber cap beam -Replacement of an approximately 12-foot length of existing timber cap beam (11-inch x 14. 125-inch) is required from beneath the concrete bridge deck at the east approach (Sheets 6, 7, and 8). The removed portion will be replaced with a new ACZA-treated timber cap beam of similar size. The proposed work for this activity will take place from a temporary floating construction platform/barge (e.g., Flexifloat® System) located beneath the bridge approach deck and temporarily secured to the bridge piles. Any temporary shoring that is required will be installed above the high water line in that location. Hydraulic jacks temporarily supported on the floating barge or temporarily attached to the bridge piles will support the bridge deck while the old timber beam is removed. The existing beam may have to be removed in sections, depending on the condition of the beam. A debris boom will be secured around the work area to confine work-related debris to the work area. The old beam will be placed on the work barge for off-site disposal at an authorized disposal facility. The new cap beam will be AZCA-treated timber and will be lifted into place by jacks or by other means and fitted into the space vacated by the old beam. Any project-related debris entering the water will be removed and placed in disposal barrels for off-site disposal. The barge and hydraulic jacks supporting the bridge deck will be removed upon project completion. Removal and replacement of the timber cap beam is expected to require 1 O days. • Replacement of grout pads -Deteriorating grout pads on three H-piles will be replaced by hand (Sheets 6, 7, and 9). The position of the H-piles precludes the use of a work barge because of the crossing bracing beneath the bridge. Work will be conducted from beneath the bridge by workers wearing waders or from temporary scaffolding erected beneath the bridge. Temporary hydraulic jacks will be secured to bridge piles to support the bridge deck while the old grout pads are removed. Old grout will be removed with hand tools (e.g., jack hammers, hammers, chisels, etc.). Tarps or scaffolding will be placed beneath the grout pads to be repaired to collect the old grout as it is removed and to collect any fresh grout that may drop during the replacement process. No fresh grout will be allowed to enter the water. As stated above, all project-related will be collected in waste barrels for off-site disposal. Removal and replacement of the grout pads is estimated to take 15 days. • Replacement of conduit clips -Approximately 10 corroded conduit clips will be replaced with new clips along the west face of the east approach (Sheets 6, 7, and 8). Work is expected to be done from the bridge deck and will not require any in-water work. The olds clips will be removed with hand tools (e.g., electric drills, screw drivers, and pliers) and the new clips will also be replaced with hand tools. The old conduit clips will not be allowed to enter the water and will be placed in waste barrels for off-site disposal. It is estimated that conduit clip replacement will require two days. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p.lboeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitt1ng\reports\be\J:)(idgemaintbe_ 111309.doc 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2.4 CONSERVATION MEASURES All activities will begin with the implementation and installation of best management practices (BMPs) for Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC). These practices include: • Providing and installing a floating debris barrier boom in the water as well as a 2-foot fabric filter fence on the bank side along the construction area. The barrier boom and the filter fence will extend to contain any debris material that may be created from the above-mentioned construction operations along the entire length of the East approach as required. • All stormwater drain inlets in and around the proposed construction operations and staging areas will be surrounded by oil sorbent padding to mitigate the potential of any hydraulic/fuel leakages emanating from construction machinery entering the project site. • Spill kits, that include absorbent pads and spill booms, will be provided near the site. • All demolished materials and debris will be stockpiled in a waste container on site to prevent dust and sedimentation from migrating onto roadways. Additionally, the bridge deck and approach structures will frequently be cleared of dust and debris by Boeing-operated sweeper vehicles. • Contractor vehicles that are transporting materials to and from the site will be required to have tires washed prior to leaving the site. This will prevent dust and sedimentation from entering nearby roadways. • No saw dust, chips, or pieces of ACZA-treated timber will be allowed to enter the water and all treated-wood debris will be placed in containers for off-site disposal in an approved disposal facility. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitling\reports\be\bridgemaintbe_ 111309.doc 4 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3.0 ACTION AREA This section describes the action area for the proposed Boeing bridge maintenance project. The action area is the defined geographic area potentially affected by the proposed project. For the purpose of establishing baseline conditions from which to evaluate potential effects of the project. the project activities, as well as physical site conditions such as substrate composition and bathymetry were reviewed. Project components that will generate impacts are above-water noise generated shore-based equipment used to conduct maintenance activities. No in-water work is proposed for the project. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p·\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance perm11ting\reportslbelbndgemaintbe_ 111309.doc 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4.0 SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITATS This section discusses species listed under the ESA that may occur in the action area (Table 1), including specific life history stages that may occur in the action area. The presence of critical habitat within the action area is also addressed. Appendix C provides general life history information about each of the listed species addressed in this BE. The USFWS lists the marbled murrelet as potentially occurring in the action area; however, their occurrence in the action area is expected to be very limited, if they occur at all. Very little, if any, suitable habitat exists within the action area and there are no records of observations of marbled murrelet within the proposed action area or adjacent areas (Jenkerson, J., WDFW, Marbled Murrelet Data Manager, e-mail comm. with Stuart, B., AMEC, February 8, 2008). Therefore, the proposed action is likely to have no effect on the marbled murrelet. 4.1 LIFE HISTORY STAGES OF LISTED SPECIES OCCURRING IN ACTION AREA This section presents information on the life history stages of species that may occur in the action area. 4.1.1 Puget Sound Chinook Salmon Adult Chinook salmon that spawn in Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 8 are classified as "ocean type" fish because they typically spend less than 6 months in fresh water after emerging from spawning gravels before entering estuarine habitats. Adult Chinook salmon enter the lake from at least late July through the end of October. Differences in timing between years may reflect differences in water temperature as adult Chinook entered the lake earlier during the year when water temperatures were cooler. The average time spent by adult Chinook in Lake Washington in 1998 was 2.9 days (Kerwin, 2001). Based upon data collected in migrant traps located at the mouths of the Cedar River and Bear/Cottage Lake Creek, there are two different life history trajectories of naturally produced juvenile Chinook that enter the lake. The first group consists of Chinook fry that enter Lake Washington from at least mid-January through mid-March. These fish spend little or no time rearing in riverine habitats before entering Lake Washington, where they rear for a number of months before migrating to Puget Sound. While rearing in the lake, the most important area used by Chinook fry appears to be the littoral zone (Kerwin, 2001 ). Chinook juveniles are rarely found in limnetic habitats until after early May. Portions of the littoral zone that are most heavily utilized by Chinook include areas around creek mouths and areas that are not heavily developed. Recent studies of microhabitat use of littoral areas AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p.\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance perm1tlinglfeports\be\bridgemaintbe_ 111309 doc 6 •' I •• I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I i I I i I (Tabor, R., USFWS, Fisheries Biologist, pers. comm., 2007) found that Chinook fry prefer areas that have small substrates (sand and small gravel) (Kerwin, 2001). The second group of juvenile Chinook that enter Lake Washington are smelts, which enter the lake from mid-May through at least late July and are of a much larger size than fry at the time they enter the lake. These fish rear for a number of months in riverine habitats before entering the lake where they spend much less time than fry rearing; smelts use the lake primarily as a migratory corridor to exit the watershed (Kerwin, 2001). Based upon observations at the Ballard Locks, juvenile Chinook migrate from Lake Washington to Puget Sound from late May through summer. During this period, Chinook juveniles can be found using much of the littoral zone of the lake as well as limnetic habitats. Increasing water temperature probably plays a key role in determining when juvenile Chinook depart from Washington in any given year. Changes in water temperature help regulate the rate of smoltification. In addition, the littoral zone of the lake eventually warms to the point where water temperatures can be stressful and then eventually lethal to the fish (Kerwin, 2001). Table 2 summarizes Chinook escapement data for the Lake Washington watershed from 1986 through 2003. 4. 1.2 Puget Sound Steelhead Trout The Lake Washington watershed hosts wild winter steelhead that spawn in tributaries to Lake Washington and Lake Sammamish, including the Cedar and Sammamish rivers. Winter steelhead are native to the basin, while hatchery-origin (Chambers Creek) winter steelhead have been stocked into the system as fry or smalls for many years. Data indicate that there is little contribution to the wild stock from hatchery fish spawning in the wild. The status of this stock is depressed (WDFW and WWTIT, 1994). Table 2 summarizes steelhead escapement data for the Lake Washington watershed from 1986 through 2004. Run timing in the Lake Washington watershed is generally from mid-December to mid-May and spawn timing is generally from early March to mid-June for wild winter steelhead (WDFW and WWTIT, 1994). The residence time of outmigrant Puget Sound steelhead in Lake Washington is unknown. Outmigrant steelhead collected at the Hiram M. Chittenden locks on the Lake Washington ship canal by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife appeared to have grown substantially before reaching marine waters of Puget Sound, indicating that the steel head may have resided in Lake Washington for some time, although there are no data describing AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p.\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance pennilting\raportslbelbridgemaintbe_ 111309.doc 7 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I i I E I I I I I M I I I I I I residence time in Lake Washington itself versus residence time in Lake Washington tributaries (Leland, B., WDFW, Fisheries Biologist, pers. comm., April 28, 2006). 4.1.3 Coastal/Puget Sound Bull Trout The largest single population of adfluvial bull trout in western Washington is found above Cedar Falls in the upper Cedar River watershed. It is believed that a small number of bull trout pass through the reservoir and downstream hydroelectric facilities to the river reaches below Cedar Falls. However, it is apparently not sufficient to support the establishment of bull trout populations under the current e_c_ological conditions (Corps, 2002). Anecdotal reports point to a historic population at the hfadwaters of Issaquah Creek in the Sammamish Lake Basin. Recent surveys have not confirmed these reports (Corps, 2002). Native char, presumably bull trout, have been observed in the fish ladder viewing pool at the Locks as recently as 1997, while isolated reports of native char being caught in or around Lake Washington occur every few years. A large juvenile char, again presumably a bull trout (-250 mm, 3 year old) was caught in the lower Cedar River in July of 1998. An adult char was also caught in the lower Cedar River in April of 1993 (Corps, 2002). Based on this information, occurrence of bull trout in the action area is expected to be extremely limited, if they occur at all. 4.2 CRITICAL HABITAT WITHIN THE ACTION AREA This section discusses the occurrence of critical habitat and the primary constituent elements (PCEs) of species-specific critical habitats within the action area. The action area contains critical habitats for Puget Sound Chinook salmon and Coastal/Puget Sound bull trout. The PCEs for each of these species are listed below, although not all of the PCEs listed occur within the action area. Critical habitat has not yet been designated for Puget Sound steelhead trout. The critical habitat PCEs for Puget Sound Chinook salmon are: 1. Freshwater spawning sites with water quantity and quality conditions and substrate supporting spawning, incubation, and larval development. 2. Freshwater rearing sites with water quantity and floodplain connectivity to form and maintain physical habitat conditions and support juvenile growth and mobility; water quality and forage supporting juvenile development; and natural cover such as shade, submerged and overhanging large wood, log jams and beaver dams, aquatic vegetation, large rocks and boulders, side channels, and undercut banks. 3. Freshwater migration corridors free of obstruction with water quantity and quality conditions and natural cover such as submerged and overhanging large wood, AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p.\baeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reports\be\bridgemaintbe_ 111309.doc 8 I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I aquatic vegetation, large rocks and boulders, side channels, and undercut banks supporting juvenile and adult mobility and survival. 4. Estuarine areas free of obstruction with water quality, water quantity and salinity conditions supporting juvenile and adult physiological transitions between fresh and salt water; natural cover such as submerged and overhanging large wood, aquatic vegetation, large rocks and boulders, side channels, and juvenile and adult forage, including aquatic invertebrates and fishes, supporting growth and maturation. 5. Nearshore marine areas free of obstruction with water quality and quantity conditions and forage, including aquatic invertebrates and fishes, supporting growth and maturation; and natural cover such as submerged and overhanging large wood, aquatic vegetation, large rocks and boulders, and side channels. 6. Offshore marine areas with water quality conditions and forage, including aquatic invertebrates and fishes, supporting growth and maturation. Of the PCEs listed above for Puget Sound Chinook salmon, only the attributes described in PCEs 2 and 3 would occur in the potential action area. The PCEs for Coastal/Puget Sound bull trout are: 1. Water temperatures that support bull trout use. Bull trout have been documented in streams with temperatures from 32 to 72°F (0 to 22°C) but are found more frequently in temperatures ranging from 36 to 59°F (2 to 15°C). These temperature ranges may vary depending on bull trout life history stage and form, geography, elevation, diurnal and seasonal variation, shade, such as that provided by riparian habitat, and local groundwater influence. Stream reaches that preclude bull trout use are specifically excluded from designation. 2. Complex stream channels with features such as woody debris, side channels, pools, and undercut banks to provide a variety of depths, velocities, and instream structures. 3. Substrates of sufficient amount, size, and composition to ensure success of egg and embryo overwinter survival, fry emergence, and young-of-the year and juvenile survival. This should include a minimal amount of fine substrate less than 0.25 inch (0.63 centimeter) in diameter. 4. A natural hydrograph, including peak, high, low, and base flows within historic ranges or, if regulated, currently operate under a biological opinion that addresses bull trout, or a hydrograph that demonstrates the ability to support bull trout populations by minimizing daily and day-to-day fluctuations and minimizing departures from the natural cycle of flow levels corresponding with seasonal variation. 5. Springs, seeps, groundwater sources, and subsurface water to contribute to water quality and quantity as a cold water source. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance perrnitt1nglfeports\be\blidgemaintbe_ 111309 doc 9 •' I I I I [ I [ I I I I I I I I I I I [ I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6. Migratory corridors with minimal physical, biological, or water quality impediments between spawning, rearing, overwintering, and foraging habitats, including intermittent or seasonal barriers induced by high water temperatures or low flows. 7. An abundant food base including terrestrial organisms of riparian origin, aquatic macroinvertebrates, and forage fish. 8. Permanent water of sufficient quantity and quality such that normal reproduction, growth, and survival are not inhibited. Of the PCEs listed above for Coastal/Puget Sound bull trout, only the attributes described in PCEs 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 would be present in the action area. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p.lboeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance pennitting\reportslbelbridgemaintbe_ 111309.doc 10 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE This section provides a brief description of the general habitat and environmental conditions within the project and action areas. Additionally, this section provides descriptions of habitat elements, significant to the species being addressed, that could be affected by the proposed action or that would affect the use of the action area by listed species. 5.1 GENERAL The proposed project site is located on the south end of Lake Washington on the extreme southern shore where the Cedar River enters Lake Washington (Sheet 1 and Appendix B - Photo 1 ). The project site is bordered to the east and west by Boeing's Renton plant and the Renton Municipal Airport, respectively. The river is approximately 136 feet wide where it enters Lake Washington. The Boeing plant site consists primarily of paved roadways, parking lots, taxiways, manufacturing facilities, and administrative offices. The Renton Municipal Airport is located immediately west of the bridge and consists primarily of concrete and asphalt surfaces used for launching and landing commercial and recreational aircraft (Sheet 1; Appendix B -Photo 1 ). 5.2 WATER QUALITY AND STORMWATER This section describes existing water quality conditions in the action area and the possible effects of the proposed action on water quality. 5.2.1 Existing Conditions No site-specific water quality data were found for the proposed project site; however, water quality monitoring has been conducted in south Lake Washington by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). Washington State's Water Quality Assessment [303(d) & 305(b) Report] (Ecology, 2008) identified exceedances of water quality standards for ammonia and fecal coliforms in south Lake Washington, while the Cedar River has exceedances for temperature, dissolved oxygen, and fecal coliforms. The Boeing Renton site operates under a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Industrial Stormwater General Permit (Permit S03-000232) issued by Ecology. This permit requires the development and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and quarterly stormwater monitoring. This plan includes BMPs necessary to prevent, control, and treat pollution of stormwater. This plan is maintained on site and can be made available upon request. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p·\boe1ng renton\14071 ·001 bridge maintenance perrnittinglreportslbelbndgemaintbe_ 111309 doc 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5.2.2 Effects of the Action The proposed action may require that some of the work beneath the bridge be completed from a work barge, but no portion of the bridge maintenance activities will require the placement of bridge components into the water or excavation of soils below the ordinary high water mark (OHWM). Therefore, no short-term or long-term adverse impacts to water quality in the action area are expected to result from the proposed action. 5.3 SHORELINE, SEDIMENT, SUBSTRATE, BATHYMETRY, AND HABITAT DIVERSITY This section describes existing conditions for the shoreline, sediment, substrate, bathymetry, and habitat diversity in the action area and the possible effects of the proposed action on these attributes. Appendix B (Photos 9 through 17) provides photographs of the Cedar River and Lake Washington shorelines in the vicinity of the project site. 5.3.1 Shoreline The shoreline of Lake Washington has been extensively altered from historical conditions when more commercial development was located on the lakeshore. As the population in the watershed has grown, the demand for residential waterfront property has increased significantly. The majority of the shoreline is now urban, residential, with the exception of a few commercial and industrial developments (e.g., Kenmore Air at the north end and the Boeing Company in the south end). Thirteen incorporated cities now border the lake (Kerwin, 2001). As the watershed has developed, dredging, filling, bulkheading, and the construction of piers, docks, and floats have occurred in shoreline areas. An estimated 82 percent of the Lake Washington shoreline has been bulkheaded. There is 33.2 miles of Lake Washington shoreline within the city limits of Seattle (this is all located along the west shoreline of Lake Washington) of which 85 percent was classified as retained (i.e., hardened) in 1999. In 1997, there were an estimated 2,700 piers and docks along the shore of the lake that collectively covered about 4 percent of the lake's surface within 100 feet of shore. Boats moored to these docks will shade an additional, but uncalculated, area. This estimate did not include marinas, moored vessels, commercial developments and bridges. Much of the large woody debris that was likely associated with the lake's shore has been eliminated. The only "natural" shoreline remaining in Lake Washington is in the vicinity of St. Edwards Park, which represents less then 5 percent of the lake's shoreline. A recent survey of the lake's shoreline under the City of Seattle's jurisdiction indicated that "natural vegetation" was present along only 22 percent of the northern shoreline and 11 percent of the southern shoreline (Kerwin, 2001). The shoreline along the proposed project site consists of a mix of undeveloped and developed property belonging to Boeing and the City of Renton (Appendix B -Photo 1). The shoreline AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:lboeing renton\14071-001 bridge main1enal"ICE! perm1aing\reports\be\bndgemaintbe_ 111309 doc 12 1' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I south of the project area occurs along both banks of the Cedar River. The Cedar River in the vicinity of the project site has been channelized and the banks within 100 feet of the project site bulkheaded (Appendix B -Photos 9 through 12). A vegetation survey was conducted on August 25, 2009, along each bank of the Cedar River, extending 100 feet upstream of the bridge deck. Because the bridge is located at the mouth of the Cedar River where it enters Lake Washington, the vegetation survey was also conducted along the shoreline of Lake Washington 100 feet east and west of the bridge (Appendix B - Photos 14 through 17). The western bank of the Cedar River within 100 feet of the bridge consists of a steel-pile and limber-lagging bulkhead, above which is located a steep bank approximately 15 feet wide (Appendix B -Photos 9, 10, and 11 ). Riparian vegetation along the western bank consists primarily of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), butterfly bush (Buddleia davidit), reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), and common tansy (Tanacetum vulgare). All of these species area listed as noxious weeds by King County. A small, unidentified species of willow (Salix spp.) was also growing along the west bank along with various, unidentified grasses. The riparian area is bordered to the west by a narrow strip of lawn, beyond which is the Renton Municipal Airport (Appendix B -Photos 1 and 11 ). The eastern bank of the Cedar River within 100 feet of the bridge is similar to that described for the western bank, consisting of a steel-pile and timber-lagging bulkhead, above which is located a steep bank approximately 20 feet wide (Appendix B-Photos 19 and 12). South of the bridge and immediately adjacent to the Cedar River is the Cedar River Trail Park (Appendix B -Photos 12 and 13). A portion of the riparian area along the eastern bank of the river within 100 feet of the bridge appears to have been landscaped with native vegetation consisting of Nootka rose (Rosa nutkana), redosier dogwood (Cornus sericea), and mock orange (Philadelphus lewisit). Additionally, the same noxious weeds found on the western bank also occurred on the eastern bank. A number of unidentified grasses were also observed on the eastern bank. Immediately east of the eastern bank is the Cedar Trail Park, consisting of a vegetated strip immediately adjacent to the riparian area, a sidewalk, and driveway. The vegetated strip beyond 100 feet south of the bridge is planted with larger trees (trunks 2:10 inches in diameter) that appeared to be bigleaf maples (Acer macrophyllum) (Appendix B-Photos 12 and 13). The Boeing facility is located to the east of the park (Sheet 1; Appendix B -Photo 1 ). The Lake Washington shoreline east and west of the North Cedar Bridge is steep, a portion of which on each side of the bridge consists of a sheet-pile bulkhead and riprap (Appendix B - AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permittmg\reports\belbridgemain!be_ 111309.doc 13 II I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I j I • I I Photos 14 through 17). The shoreline west of the bridge and adjacent to the Renton Municipal Airport consists primarily of Himalayan blackberry and butterfly bush, along with some unidentified grasses. Immediately south and adjacent to the western shoreline is a narrow strip of maintained lawn (approximately 1 O to 15 feet wide), beyond which is the asphalt runway of the Renton Municipal Airport. Vegetation along the Lake Washington shoreline east of the bridge is dominated by Himalayan blackberry, reed canarygrass, and butterfly bush. Japanese knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum) and unidentified grasses were also observed along the shoreline east of the bridge (Appendix B -Photos 15 and 16). Large woody debris has been deposited in Lake Washington at the mouth of the Cedar River (Appendix B-Photo 17). A shallow delta has developed at the mouth of the Cedar River, consisting of fine sediments. Aquatic vegetation observed during the survey included Canada waterweed (Elodea canadensis), white-stemmed pondweed (Potamogeton praelongus), curly leaf pondweed (Potamogeton crispus), and common duckweed (Lemna minor). 5.3.2 Sediment, Substrate, and Bathymetry The proposed project site is located at the mouth of the Cedar River. The nearshore area adjacent to the site in Lake Washington is dominated by the Cedar River delta, which resulted in shoaling caused by sediment deposition from the Cedar River. The nearshore area along Lake Washington in the immediate project vicinity has a gently sloping bottom with depths from Oto about 4 feet (NOAA, 2008). With realignment of the Cedar River into Lake Washington in 1912, the zone of sediment deposition was localized through the City of Renton (Perkins, 1994). All of the non- suspendable sediment load is now deposited along this reach because Lake Washington lies at the river's mouth. With the path of the river fixed by armored banks, progressive infilling of the channel resulted. Sediment is continually deposited in the downstream 2 miles of the river and in an enlarging delta in Lake Washington. According to Perkins (1994), periodic dredging of sediment from the channel and delta was discontinued in about 1982. Since that time, the sediment buildup has severely reduced the flood conveyance of the channel (Perkins, 1994). However, the Corps conducted dredging operations along the lower 1.5 miles of the Cedar River that extended into the delta in July 1998. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p·\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance perm1tting\reports\belbndgemaintbe_ 111309.doc 14 ,, 1' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I E I I I I I B I I a I I I I I I I I During a site visit on August 25, 2009, AMEC personnel reported that the nearshore area along the Lake Washington shoreline adjacent to the site was very shallow (approximately 1 to 2 feet deep) and that the substrate appeared to consist of fine sediment and sand. 5.3.3 Habitat Diversity Habitat diversity along the shoreline is in the project vicinity is limited. The lower Cedar River in the project area has been channelized and substantially altered, so that there is a limited riparian area that cannot provide all of the potential ecological functions of an unaltered habitat. Because small shrubs dominate the riparian vegetation and there is a lack of large trees, there is very limited, if any, shading provided by the riparian vegetation. Both banks of the river in the project area are bulkheaded and highly developed, so that there is no potential for the creation of meanders or off-channel habitat. Because of extensive development along both banks of the river in the project area (Boeing to the east and the Renton Municipal Airport to the west), there is little, if any, transition between riparian and upland habitats. Similarly, riparian vegetation along the shoreline of Lake Washington in the project vicinity is dominated by invasive plant species, so that ecological functions are very limited, as described above. Large woody debris deposited in the delta formed by the Cedar River (Appendix B - Photo 17) may provide some nursery and refugia habitat for juvenile salmonids; however, water depths in the nearshore area of the project site are very shallow (91 feet), likely resulting in warming of nearshore areas by solar radiation in the summer months. 5.3.4 Effects of the Action The proposed action will have no in-water construction component. Although some of the proposed work (replacement of grout caps and timber cap) will have to be done from beneath the bridge using a work barge or boat, these project elements will not result in the placement of bridge components in the water of the Cedar River or Lake Washington. All work will be conducted above the water to make the necessary repairs to the bridge. There will be no project-related effects on existing shoreline conditions, sediment, substrate, bathymetry, or habitat diversity in the action area. 5.4 ACCESS AND REFUGIA This section describes existing conditions for access and refugia in the action area and the possible effects of the proposed action on these attributes. 5.4.1 Existing Conditions No fish-passage barriers exist in the project area, which provides shallow-water habitat for juvenile salmonids, as well as for other fish and aquatic biota. The proposed action has no AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p·\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance perrn1tling\reports\be\bridgemaintbe_ 111309 doc 15 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ) I I E I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I in-water component and will not result in construction that could be perceived as altering existing conditions in the action area for access and refugia of aquatic biota. 5.4.2 Effects of the Action The proposed action will have no effect on access and refugia within the action area. 5.5 FLOW AND CURRENT PATTERNS This section describes existing conditions of flow and current patterns in the action area and the possible effects of the proposed action on these attributes. 5.5.1 Existing Conditions No studies were located describing currents in the nearshore area of the action area. Given the site location at the mouth of the Cedar River, it is expected that currents in the action area are dominated by river flow and discharge to Lake Washington. Peak discharge occurs between December and February (1,040 to 1,090 cubic feet per second [cfs]), while minimum discharge (192 cfs) occurs in August (USGS, 2009). 5.5.2 Effects of the Action The proposed action will have no effect on flow or current patterns within the action area. 5.6 MACROALGAE This section describes macroalgae in the action area and the possible effects of the proposed action on macroalgae. 5.6.1 Existing Conditions Aquatic vegetation observed in the project area during an August 25, 2009, site visit included Canada waterweed (Elodea canadensis), white-stemmed pondweed (Potamogeton prae/ongus), curly leaf pondweed (Potamogeton crispus), and common duckweed (Lemna minor). Lake Washington hosts a number of nuisance aquatic plants, primarily Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllium spicatum) and Brazilian elodea (Egeria densa). Neither of these species was observed during the site visit. 5.6.2 Effects of the Action The proposed action will have no effect on macroalgae within the action area. 5.7 BENTHIC FAUNA This section describes the benthic faunal community in the action area and the possible effects of the proposed action on benthic fauna. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance pennitting\reports\belbndgemaintbe_ 111309.00C 16 I I I I I I I I I I r I I • • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I i I I I I 5.7.1 Existing Conditions No site-specific information is available describing benthic faunal communities in the project area. Mature and larval terrestrial insects and small crustaceans are the main prey for juvenile salmon ids in fresh water (Groot and Margolis, 1991 ). Several of the habitat indicators listed above are important in determining the productivity and composition of the epibenthic community. Terrestrial insects can comprise as much as 95 percent of the diet of juvenile Chinook salmon (Becker, 1973). It is expected that a number of invertebrate species occur in sediments of the project area, including chironomids (midges), members of the insect orders Emphemeroptera (mayflies) and Trichoptera (caddisflies), as well as others. Bennett and Cubbage (1992) conducted benthic macroinvertebrate sampling at stations in Lake Washington located northeast of the proposed near the J.H. Baxter and Quendall Terminals sites. The benthic community was dominated by sponges (Porifera), bivalves (Gastropoda), oligochaete worms (Oligochaeta), and chironomids (Diptera). Because substrate type can affect benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages, whether the benthic community in the action area is similar to that reported by Bennett and Cubbage (1992) is unknown. 5.7.2 Effects of the Action The proposed action will have no effect on the benthic macroinvertebrate community within the action area. 5.8 FORAGE FISH This section describes forage fish in the action area and the possible effects of the proposed action on forage fish. 5.8.1 Existing Conditions A landlocked population of longfin smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys) occurs in Lake Washington. The species spawns in at least five tributaries to Lake Washington, with the Cedar River by far the most important (Wydoski and Whitney, 2003). Because of its tendency to remain in the deep pelagic zone restricts its availability to some piscivorous species, including cutthroat trout, smallmouth bass, and largemouth bass (Tabor et al., 2004; Wydoski and Whitney, 2003). No studies were found describing the extent to which longfin smelt are preyed upon by salmon species using Lake Washington. Because returning adult salmon stop feeding upon entering estuaries, it is doubtful that adult salmon use longfin smelt as a prey resource in Lake Washington and because of its preference for deep pelagic areas of the lake, it is doubtful that longfin smelt are a primary prey species for juvenile salmonids. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p.lboeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reports\be\bridgemaintbe_ 111309.doc 17 I I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •• I I I I I I I I I I 5.8.2 Effects of the Action The proposed action will have no effect on forage fish within the action area. 5.9 AMBIENT NOISE This section describes ambient noise in the action area and the possible effects of the proposed action on ambient noise. 5.9.1 Existing Conditions No site-specific information was found describing existing ambient noise levels in Lake Washington. Ambient noise levels in Puget Sound are typically around 130 peak sound pressure level measured in decibels (dBpeak) (WSDOT, 2007). Underwater baseline noise for the Hood Canal is reported to range from 115 to 135 root mean square sound pressure level measured in decibels (dBrms) (WSDOT, 2007). No information was found describing baseline noise levels for Lake Washington. There are numerous contributing sources to baseline noise conditions in Lake Washington, including those produced by natural sources such as lightning strikes (260 decibels [dB]), and waves breaking on the water's surface (WSDOT, 2007), as well as from the following anthropogenic sources: • traffic noise attributable to the SR-520 and 1-90 floating bridges; • noise from shoreline industrial, commercial, and residential activities; • noise from commercial and recreational vessels; • noise from float plane traffic; and • noise from airplanes using the Renton Municipal Airport, including Boeing commercial aircraft. Ambient noise levels can range louder in areas of high human usage. Ambient noise levels at Everett Home Port are reported to be between 80 and 90 dB (Sound Pressure Level [SPL]) (the author did not specify if these were peak or rms values), while those at the Mukilteo ferry terminal have been reported to be approximately 145 dBpeak in the absence of ferry traffic (WSDOT, 2007). Commercial sonar devices operate in a frequency range of 15 kilohertz (kHz) to 200 kHz and in an acoustical range of 150 to 215 dB (WSDOT, 2007). Ambient noise levels in Puget Sound with no construction activity have been reported to range between 131 dBpeak and 136 dBpeak. With construction activity (excluding pile driving), the ambient underwater noise levels can range between 133 dBpeak and 140 dBpeak (WSDOT, 2007). Ambient noise in the Duwamish River averaged over 20 seconds to 5 minutes varied between 110 to 130 dB (SPL) (WSDOT, 2007). AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\hoeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reportslbe\bridgemaintbe_ 111309.doc 18 ,1 1! I I I I I I r I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I 5.9.2 Effects of the Action No in-water work will occur as part of the proposed action. Any ambient noise (air) associated with the project will be attributable to equipment used in bridge maintenance activities and is expected to be within the typical range of background ambient noise. Any noise associated with the proposed project will be temporary, lasting only for the duration of the proposed activity and ending with project completion. Given the proximity of the project site to the Renton Municipal Airport, which is used by both commercially and recreationally by both propeller and jet aircraft, any noise generated by the proposed project is expected to be substantially less than that caused by operations at the Renton Municipal Airport. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p·\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permittinglfeports\belbridgernaintbe_ 111309.doc 19 I I I I [ I [ I [ I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I· I I I I I I I I I 6.0 EFFECTS OF THE ACTION ON LISTED SPECIES AND THEIR CRITICAL HABITATS This section discusses potential short-term and long-term direct and indirect effects on listed species and their critical habitats from project activities, and concludes with an effects determination. Only attributes of listed species that are relevant to the action area and that are likely to be affected by the project are addressed. Three species protected under the ESA potentially occur in the action area (Table 1 ). General life history information for Puget Sound Chinook salmon, Coastal/Puget Sound bull trout, and Puget Sound steelhead is presented in Appendix C. An assessment of Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) is presented in Appendix D, describing habitat for federally-managed commercial fish species, potential project impacts, and proposed conservation measures. 6.1 PUGET SOUND CHINOOK SALMON This section discusses potential short-term and long-term direct and indirect effects on Puget Sound Chinook salmon attributable to project activities. No long-term direct or indirect impacts are expected as a result of the proposed project. The only short-term, direct impact to Chinook salmon that may result from the proposed project are those attributable to noise. 6.1.1 Noise This section discusses potential impacts to Chinook salmon associated with project-related noise. 6.1.1.1 Long-Term Direct Effects No long-term direct effects to Chinook salmon attributable to project-related noise are expected. 6.1.1.2 Long-Term Indirect Effects No long-term indirect effects to Chinook salmon attributable to project-related noise are expected. 6.1.1.3 Short-Term Direct Effects Sound is usually measured in decibels (dBs). A decibel is a relative measure that must be accompanied by a reference scale. When describing underwater sound pressure, the reference scale is usually 1 micro-pascal (µPa) and is expressed as "dB re: 1 µPa." In this AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boeing rentoo\14071-001 bridge maintenance permilting\reports\be\bridgemaintbe_ 111309 doc 20 ! I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • i I document, underwater sound is referred to in units of decibels re: 1 µPa and will be denoted as dB. Temporary behavioral changes have been reported from sound pressure levels in excess of 150 dBrms. Behavioral changes include elicitation of a startle response (Jones & Stokes, 2004); desensitization to startle response (Jones & Stokes, 2004); disruption of migratory behavior (Feist et al., 1992); and agitation with changed swimming behavior (Jones & Stokes, 2004). Temporary changes in behavior may result in a decrease in a fish's ability to avoid predators (Jones & Stokes, 2004). Sources of underwater noise at the project site attributable to project activities may include the operation of heavy equipment (above water) and boats. The noise levels produced by these sources are expected to be similar to those produced by other ambient noise sources within Lake Washington. Noise resulting from project activities may elicit a temporary avoidance behavior in Chinook salmon, causing them to avoid the action area during active construction. Any potential impacts to Chinook salmon would be temporary and localized, persisting only for the duration of bridge maintenance activities. Noise generated by the operation of heavy equipment is expected to have a minor impact on listed Chinook salmon. The time required to complete bridge maintenance is expected to be one month. The probability of noise impacts to listed salmonid species will be further minimized by restricting project activities to the authorized work window for south Lake Washington, thus avoiding or minimizing contact with listed salmonids during critical migration periods. 6.1.1.4 Short-Term Indirect Effects No short-term indirect effects to Chinook salmon attributable to project-related noise are expected. 6.1.2 Water Quality This section discusses potential impacts to Chinook salmon associated with project-related impacts to water quality 6.1.2.1 Long-Term Direct Effects No long-term direct effects to Chinook salmon attributable to project-related water quality impacts are expected. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:IDOeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reports\be\bridgemaintbe_ 111309 doc 21 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I· I I I I I I I I i I 6.1.2.2 Long-Term Indirect Effects No long-term indirect effects to Chinook salmon attributable to project-related water quality impacts are expected. 6.1.2.3 Short-Term Direct Effects No short-term direct effects to Chinook salmon attributable to project-related water quality impacts are expected. 6.1.2.4 Short-Term Indirect Effects No short-term indirect effects to Chinook salmon attributable to project-related water quality impacts are expected. 6.1.3 Effects Determination The proposed action will occur during the authorized work window for the Cedar River when few, if any, Puget Sound Chinook salmon are likely to be present in the action area. The proposed action is not expected to have any long-term or short-term adverse, direct or indirect effects on Puget Sound Chinook salmon. With the exception of some of the bridge maintenance work being done from a barge temporarily anchored to the bridge piles, no work will actually be done in the Cedar River. Noise generated during active construction may affect the behaviors of Chinook salmon that may be present in the action area, but such effects will be only localized and temporary. To minimize potential effects of the project on Chinook salmon, in-water construction will occur only during the authorized work window for the Cedar River. No project-related impacts to water quality are expected, so no adverse effects to Puget Sound Chinook salmon would occur. Thus, the effects determination for the proposed action is that it may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect Puget Sound Chinook salmon. 6.1.4 Effects on Critical Habitat The primary constituent elements determined essential to the conservation of Puget Sound Chinook salmon are presented in Section 4.2. Of the listed PCEs, only the following PC Es occur in the action area: • Freshwater rearing sites with water quantity and floodplain connectivity to form and maintain physical habitat conditions and support juvenile growth and mobility; water quality and forage supporting juvenile development; and natural cover such as shade, submerged and overhanging large wood, log jams and beaver dams, aquatic vegetation, large rocks and boulders, side channels, and undercut banks. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boe1ng renton\14071-001 bndge main1enance perm1ttmg\reportslbelbridgemaintbe_ 111309.doc 22 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~· I I I I I I jl • Freshwater migration corridors free of obstruction with water quantity and quality conditions and natural cover such as submerged and overhanging large wood, aquatic vegetation, large rocks and boulders, side channels, and undercut banks supporting juvenile and adult mobility and survival. The proposed action will have no effect on the PCEs that do not occur in the action area. The proposed action is expected to have no effect on the listed PCEs occurring in the action area. 6.2 PUGET SOUND/COASTAL BULL TROUT The effects of the proposed action on bull trout are expected to be similar or identical to those discussed above for Puget Sound Chinook salmon. Please refer to Section 6.2 for a discussion of potential effects of the proposed action on bull trout 6.2.1 Effects Determination The effects determination for the proposed action is that it may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect Coastal/Puget Sound bull trout 6.2.2 Effects on Critical Habitat The primary constituent elements determined essential to the conservation of Coastal/Puget Sound bull trout are presented in Section 4.2. Of the listed PC Es, only the following PCEs occur in the action area: • Water temperatures that support bull trout use. Bull trout have been documented in streams with temperatures from 32 to 72°F (0 to 22°C) but are found more frequently in temperatures ranging from 36 to 59°F (2 to 15°C). These temperature ranges may vary depending on bull trout life history stage and form, geography, elevation, diurnal and seasonal variation, shade, such as that provided by riparian habitat, and local groundwater influence. Stream reaches that preclude bull trout use are specifically excluded from designation. • Complex stream channels with features such as woody debris, side channels, pools, and undercut banks to provide a variety of depths, velocities, and instream structures. • A natural hydrograph, including peak, high, low, and base flows within historic ranges or, if regulated, currently operate under a biological opinion that addresses bull trout, or a hydrograph that demonstrates the ability to support bull trout populations by minimizing daily and day-to-day fluctuations and minimizing departures from the natural cycle offlow levels corresponding with seasonal variation. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p.\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reports\be\bridgamamtbe_ 111309 doc 23 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I o Migratory corridors with minimal physical, biological, or water quality impediments between spawning, rearing, overwintering, and foraging habitats, including intermittent or seasonal barriers induced by high water temperatures or low flows. • An abundant food base including terrestrial organisms of riparian origin, aquatic macroinvertebrates, and forage fish. o Permanent water of sufficient quantity and quality such that normal reproduction, growth, and survival are not inhibited. The proposed action will have no effect on the PCEs that do not occur in .the action area. The proposed action is expected to have no effect on the listed PCEs occurring in the action area. 6.3 PUGET SOUND STEELHEAD TROUT The effects of the proposed action on Puget Sound steelhead are expected to be similar or identical to those discussed for Puget Sound Chinook salmon. Please refer to Section 6.2 for a discussion of potential effects of the action on Puget Sound steel head that may use the action area. 6.3.1 Effects Determination The proposed action will occur during the authorized work window for the Cedar River; however, because Puget Sound steelhead may rear in freshwater habitats for several years before outmigrating, it is possible that juvenile steel head could occur in the action area during bridge maintenance activities. The proposed action is not expected to have any long-term adverse, direct or indirect effects on Puget Sound steelhead trout. With the exception of some of the bridge maintenance work being done from a barge temporarily anchored to the bridge piles, no work will actually be done in the Cedar River. Noise generated during active construction may affect the behaviors of steelhead trout that may be present in the action area, but such effects will be only localized and temporary. To minimize potential effects of the project on Chinook salmon, in-water construction will occur only during the authorized work window for the Cedar River. No project-related impacts to water quality are expected, so no adverse effects to Puget Sound steelhead trout would occur. Thus, the effects determination for the proposed action is that it may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect Puget Sound steelhead trout. 6.3.2 Effects on Critical Habitat Critical habitat has not been designated for Puget Sound steelhead. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p.\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reports\belbridgemaintbe_ 111309.doc 24 I I I I I I I I I I f I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I 7.0 INTERRELATED/INTERDEPENDENT ACTIONS AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS Interdependent actions are those from actions with no independent utility apart from the proposed action. Interrelated actions include those that are part of a larger action and depend on the larger action for justification. Cumulative effects are those from state or private activities not involving activities of other federal agencies that are reasonably certain to occur within the area of the federal action subject to consultation (50 CFR 402.02 Definitions). The proposed action, maintenance activities on an existing bridge, will not expand the size of the bridge nor increase usage. Therefore, no interdependent or interrelated actions are expected as a result of the proposed action. Federal actions unrelated to the proposed action are not considered in this section because they require separate consultation pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. Therefore, no cumulative effects are expected as a result of the proposed action. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc . p:lboeing renton\1-4071-001 bridge maintenance permittinglreports\belbridgemaintbe_ 111309 doc 25 I fi I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I E I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I I 8.0 SUMMARY The proposed action, maintenance activities on a bridge spanning the Cedar River, may result in localized, temporary increases in ambient noise, but no impacts to water quality are expected. The effects determinations for each of the listed species and for the primary constituent elements of their critical habitats present in the action area are summarized in Table 3. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permittinglreports\belbridgemaintbe_ 111309.doc 26 El II I I I fl IJ I I I E I i I M ! I I R I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 9.0 REFERENCES Becker, C.D., 1973, Food and growth parameters of juvenile Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, in central Columbia River: Fisheries Bulletin (U.S.), v. 71, p. 387-400. Bennett, J., and Cubbage, J., 1992, Effects of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Sediments from Lake Washington on Freshwater Bioassay Organisms and Benthic Macroinvertebrates (92-e01 ): Washington State Department of Ecology, Environmental Investigations and Laboratory Services Program, Toxics, Compliance, and Ground Water Investigations Section, Olympia, http://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/ 92101.html (accessed September 12, 2009). Corps (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers), 2002, Montlake Cut Slope Stabilization Project Environmental Assessment Biological Evaluation -Lake Washington Ship Canal, Seattle, Washington: Corps, Seattle District, Seattle, Washington. Ecology (Washington State Department of Ecology), 2008, Washington State's 2008 Water Quality Assessment [303(d) & 305{b) Report]: Ecology, Olympia, http:// www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/303d/2008/index.html (accessed September 15, 2009). Feist, B.E., Anderson, J.J., and Miyamoto, R., 1992, Potential Impacts of Pile Driving on Juvenile Pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and Chum (0. keta) Salmon Behavior and Distribution: University of Washington, Fisheries Research Institute, FRI-UW-9603, Seattle. Groot, C., and Margolis, L., 1991, Pacific Salmon Life Histories-Government of Canada, Department if Fisheries and Oceans, Biological Services Branch, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada: University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver. Jones & Stokes, 2004, Biological Evaluation -Regional General Permit for Modification and Construction of Residential Overwater Structures in Inland Marine Waters of Washington State: Prepared by Jones & Stokes, Bellevue, Washington, for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District, Seattle, Washington. Kerwin, J., 2001, Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Limiting Factors Report for the Cedar- Sammamish Basin (Water Resource Inventory Area 8): Washington Conservation Commission, Olympia. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), 2008, Washington -Lake Washington Ship Canal and Lake Washington (Chart 18447): U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, National Ocean Service, Coast Survey, Washington, D.C., http://www.charts.noaa.gov/OnLineViewer/18447.shtml (accessed August 21, 2009). Perkins, S.J., 1994, The shrinking Cedar River-channel changes following flow regime regulation and bank armoring, in Proceedings of Effects of Human-Induced Changes on Hydrologic Systems: American Water Resources Association 1994 Annual Summer Symposium, p. 649-658. Tabor, R.A., Celedonia, M.T., Mejia1, F., Piaskowski, R.M., Low, D.L., Footen, B., and Park, L., 2004, Predation of Juvenile Chinook Salmon by Predatory Fishes in Three Areas of the AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boemg renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reports\be\bridgemaintbe_ 111309 doc 27 [ I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I E I i I I I H I I I I I I I I I I I I Lake Washington Basin: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office, Fisheries Division, Lacey, Washington. USGS (United States Geological Survey), 2009, USGS Surface-Water Monthly Statistics for Washington -USGS 12119000 Cedar River at Renton, Washington: Department of the Interior, USGS, National Water Information System, http://waterdata.usgs.gov/wa/ nwis/monthly?referred_module=sw&site_no=12119000&por_ 12119000_ 19=1179603,0 0060, 19, 1945-09,2008-09&start_dt=1945-09&end_dt=2008-09&format=html_ table&date _format= YYYY -M M-DD&rd b _ compression=file&submitted _form =parameter_selection_list (accessed August 24, 2009). WDFW (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife), 2002, Washington State Salmon and Steelhead Stock Inventory: WDFW, Olympia, http://wdfw.wa.gov/fish/sasi/ (accessed September 15, 2009). WDFW, 2009, Habitats and Species Report in the Vicinity of T23R05E Section 7: WDFW, Priority Habitat and Species Program, Olympia (September 11, 2009). WDFW (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife) and WWTIT (Western Washington Treaty Indian Tribes), 1994, 1992 Washington State Salmon and Steelhead Stock Inventory, Appendix One -Puget Sound Stocks, Hood Canal and Strait of Juan de Fuca Volume: WDFW and WWTIT, Olympia. WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation), 2007, Biological Assessment Preparation for Transportation Projects -Advanced Training Manual: WSDOT, Olympia. Wydoski, R.S., and Whitney, R.R., 2003, Inland Fishes of Washington: American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, and University of Washington Press, Seattle. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance perm1ttinglreportslbelbridgemaintbe_ 111a09.doc 28 •' 1' ,1 II I I I I I I r I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE 1 ESA-LISTED SPECIES POTENTIALLY OCCURRING IN THE ACTION AREA Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Listing Status Species 1Datel Critical Habitat Fish Puget Sound Chinook Salmon Threatened Designated (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) (03/24/99) Coastal/Puget Sound Bull Trout Threatened Designated (Salve/inus confluentus) (06/10/98) Puget Sound Steelhead Trout Threatened Under Development (0. mykiss) (05/7/07) P:\BOEING RENTON\14071-001 Bridge Maintenance Perm~ting\Reports\BE\Tables\BoeingMaintBE_Tables.doc AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. Page 1 of 1 1' 1! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Year 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Note/sl TABLE 2 ADULT ESCAPEMENT FOR LAKE WASHINGTON CEDAR RIVER CHINOOK AND WINTER STEELHEAD Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Cedar River Chinook Winter Steelhead 942 1,816 1,540 1,172 559 858 558 686 469 714 508 621 525 599 156 184 452 70 681 126 303 234 227 620 432 584 241 220 120 48 810 42 369 38 562 20 NR 44 1. Source: WDFW, 2002. WDFW (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife), 2002, Washington State Salmon and Steelhead Stock Inventory: WDFW, Olympia, http://wdfw.wa.gov/fish/sasi/ (accessed September 15, 2009). Abbreviation(s) NR -Not reported P:IBOEING RENT OM 14071·001 Bridge Maintenance Permi\ting\ReporislBE\T ables\BoeingMaintBE _Tables.doc AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I· I I I I I I I I I I TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF EFFECTS DETERMINATIONS FOR LISTED SPECIES AND THEIR CRITICAL HABITATS IN THE ACTION AREA Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Species/PC Es Puget Sound Chinook Salmon Critical Habitat PCEs 1, 4, 5, and 6 Critical Habitat PCE 2 and 3 Coastal/Puget Sound Bull Trout Critical Habitat PCEs 3 and 5 Critical Habitat PCEs 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8 Puget Sound Steelhead Trout Abbreviation(s) LAA = Likely to adversely affect NE= No effect NLAA = Not likely to adversely affect PCE = Primary constituent elements NE X X X X NLAA X X X LAA P:\BOEING RENTON\14071-001 Bridge Maintenance Permitting\Reports\BE\Tables\BoeingMaintBE_Tables.doc AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I FIGURES (SHEETS) I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I E I R I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LAKE WASHINGTON PROJECT LOCATION PUGET SOUND POWER & LICHT COMPN{'r' '\ \' .\ I I \ -i •• -I I ,, \ \ \ l''' ~ '.~ ) • ,, • CITY OF RENTON Section: NE Section: 7 Township: 23 N Range: SE Latitude: 47 .5005 N Latitude Longitude: -122.2159 W Longitude PURPOSE: Bridge maintenance. DATUM: MLLW ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: Washington Deportment of Natural Resources City of Renton NAME: Mark Clement The Boeing Company SITE LOCATION ADDRESS: 737 Logan Ave. N. Renton, WA 98038 0 I \·. ' l' \ . ' I t \ ' -\ ' Jl \ \ ~ "'H l!Mn DRIVING DIRECTIONS FROM 1-5 From 1-5, merge onto 1-405 Northbound at Exit 154. Merge onto WA-167 N. I Valley Freew-ay via Exit 2 toward Rentoo/Rainier Ave. Merge onto Rainier Ave. S. Turn Right onto Airport Way S. Airport Way S. becomes Logan Ave. S. {Gate access required onto Boelng pwperty) End at 737 Logan Ave. N., Renton, WA 98057 VICINITY MAP APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 400 800 1600 PROPOSED: Bridge maintenance. IN: Cedar River NEAR/AT:Clty of Renton COUNTY: King STATE: WA SHEET Sheet 1 of 9 DATE: 11 /6/09 ,r ,r II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I Topo1800,~ i \ 4· «>-r i ' n,1-11,""-\-": ,ro,.,,.,-1 \ i \ i i i 1---, I I \ \ _.i.~~~.!-.-·-----1·-r '1, I i i \~ !1 \t I i i i ! I \ '\ i : \ \ I I i \ f &::I,. \ \ ~, i \ \ \(',\ \~ , .... --... ~ .. ,.., ....... '"' r,,.,~~ 9,....,...,_/ ! Q C z m KE WASHINGTON ' \ \ Pl AN YlfW \ i .. ----------------- EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW Section: NE Section: 7 Township: 23 N Range: 5E Latitude: 47.5005 N Latitude Longitude: -122.2159 W Longitude PURPOSE: Bridge maintenance. DATUM: MLLW ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS Washington Department of Natural Resources City of Renton NAME: Mark Clement The Boeing Company SITE LOCATION ADDRESS: 737 Logan Ave. N. Renton, WA 98038 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 0 35 70 140 PROPOSED: Bridge mointanance. IN: Cedar River NEAR/AT:City of Renton COUNTY: King STATE: WA SHEET Sheet 2 of 9 DATE: 11 /6/09 •' I I I I I I I I r I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I· I I I I I L 1.f." • r ASA cio. 50 ent iron Pip, under lol«I to 8/)'n Wl7lrr t=-------------=:::::::::::::-:::::::::------~•WG99 Tr1otm1,it Plant --------,\\ U KE WASHINGTON ,, ,, \ 1-J/.f."C, J #10, .f.40V ' ,, ' \ Sheet pi~ depth ,, £xfsting Timt>e I ,, B fki¥£'dfi rop of Bank ,, ,, 'r \ \ -----1:; -------, Outsfd~ comer \ --1 -------D-___ _ r ------" ---·-i L-~\ ----1'.,.r.--11,_, 1 ,\_--\,--\ 1 1 \ 1 C f---..---fai;sling Hinged Slab Work Poln! ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ', ,, \' I ' ' ' -------' \ I \ ,,, J. \ I, [xistin9 1 u~~efd B~ow + I f7'-1 , . , 'J , 1 ___ ---------------·r. 1 L---,-+~-----1~rJ · -' 31. I ·-_3..\-· . - I -------· . I ~ I \ ----j r--------~ i] \ -_ ';i 1 1 \ \ \ ~ ' ~ l \ I\ ~tJ ti \i, -£dge of Hin9• Slob (") I r,,'<1 I ·,o \~ \ \ r-' I ~ \ '' " I \ \ ------\ ~-_;:' ,:: . w ti}I i -----., -----I ' I ' ' i " I i i i i i I ..... ••••••••• 30"CP SS () ' ·-·-··---~-.r::=====::l: '======== ' i " \ ?J ~ I \ \ , ~ Ex/3!ing Bulkhead ' ' ' L------------------ Section: NE Section: 7 Township: 23 N Range:SE Latitude: 47.5005 N Latitude Longitude: -122.2159 W longitude EXISTING CONDITIONS DETAILED PLAN VIEW APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET PURPOSE: Bridge maintenance. DATUM: MLLW ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: Washington Department of Natural Resources City of Renton NAME: Mork Clement The Boeing Company SITE LOCATION ADDRESS: 737 Logan Ave. N. Renton, WA 98038 0 20 40 80 PROPOSED: Bridge maintenance. IN: Cedar River NEAR/AT:Clty of Renton COUNTY: King STATE: WA SHEET Sheet 3 of 9 DATE: 11/6/09 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Section: NE Section: 7 Township: 23 N Range: 5E PURPOSE: Bridge maintenance. DATUM: MLLW ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: r,=~J II 11:,==J II~ --" I r-·:-~ I : itrr-=--, s I ~--r- I ' l I ! ' l .,.;._-~~~ I f"" d MATCHLlr,IE ! l! i !i i! I l i -:i:'.:,~ i ------~ 1, I iJ "l --· ··- -~~~ iiE:!.'::.=.J ' ., 11 \ 1 I ,1~ I· ~' :_,.~ ~- I ' 'f' l rt[=~ 11 \ ' 11yr-l I __ .;:, &\· r""'==>o Latitude: 47 .5005 N Latitude Longitude: -122.2159 W Longitude NAME: Mark Clement The Boeing Company SITE LOCATION ADDRESS: Washington Deporlment of Natural Resources City of Renton 737 Logan Ave. N. Renton, WA 98D38 EXISTING CONDITIONS, CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 0 35 70 PROPOSED: Bridge maintenance. IN: Cedar River NEAR/ AT:Clty of Renton COUNTY: King STATE: WA SHEET Sheet 4 of 9 DA TE: 11 /6/09 11 11 11 1' I I 1' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Section: NE Section: 7 Township: 23 N Range:5E ' : J PURPOSE: Bridge maintenance. DATUM: t.lLLW ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: MATCH LINE -'--_-__ b_-----, · L Latitude: 47.5005 N latitude Longitude: ·122.2159 W longitude NAME: Mark Clement The Boeing Company SITE LOCATION ADDRESS: Washington Department of Natural Resources City of Renton 737 Logan Ave. N, Renton, WA 98038 "' 111 ~ ;;; -~ ;: I 111 0 ' MATCH LINE ' et t' ,~ EXISTING CONDITIONS, CROSS SECTIONAL DETAIL VIEW APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 40 PROPOSED: Bridge maintenance. IN: Cedar River NEAR/AT:Ctty of Renton COUNTY: King STATE: WA SHEET Sheet 5 of 9 DA TE: 11 /6/09 11 11 11 ,1 I I 1' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I +co-• \' \ :re. >-/1 ---;--', i ,1'0.,r..--i \ \ \ \ I \ \ , I \ ~----____ !.~'.!~~~::-.------1-\ i I \ . i \ \ \ \ \ I l !", i \ I ' ,, I \ I\' \ \ ii \~ '"''"' ~ •• "" \ \ ...... ,-... I i i .E WASHINGTON 0 Pl AN VIEW L 1<'•r-.<ro..J<1t:..im flp<_,. .. i...,.._ .. _ .... __ , t-------------------===·-·::::,::::: ::::=::\, " .............. 0 © ',' ,-.v•·c. ~ l•O. •• .,., \ \\ I \\ " ,, \\ ,. \ ' ' : I STAGING AREA ,.. _______ ---------- 1m,,,, 111.'·".,'J.Jt·, +r 1 , .. 1;.,·: PROPOSED MAINTENANCE TASKS PLAN VIEW Section:NE Section: 7 Township: 23 N Range: 5E Lalltude: 47.5005 N Lalitud& Loogltud&: ·122.2159W Longitude PURPOSE· Bridge mainfenonca. DA TUM: MLLW ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: Washington Department of Natural Resources City of Renton NAME: Mark Clement The Boeing Company SITE LOCATION ADDRESS, 737 Logan Ave. N. Renton, WA 98038 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET c;;:r C, r-, L.....W CJ 0 35 70 PROPOSED: Bridge mointononce. IN: Cedar River NEAR/AT:City of Renton 140 COUNTY: King STA TE: WA SHEET Sheet 6 of 9 DATE, 11 /6/09 •' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I KE WASHINGTON ---- ~\ '-I ' o I ::c \ ~ \ Section: NE Section: 7 Township: 23 N Range:SE PURPOSE: \ \ \ \ ?J \ \ \ \ Bridge maintenance. DATUM: MLLW ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: ~--================-------------Lif:.::;~::.t.fo:rE ~,,ro• ---------,\\ She~! pi!~ dnp!h ... 15·-o· (JS') D(PTfi +we-1 12·-D" w-o a--------- \ \ \ o! ,, ,, I !-:J/4"C, 3 #10, .ol-4DV ' ,, ,, B lktlffdf Top of Bonk ,, ,, \ I ,, --~\ - -----rt ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, STAGING AREA ••••••••• 30~CP SS ' ' ········---~=====~ ' ' -======= &i,.fing 61.Jlkhead ' ' ' ' L----------------- lj\ llE/,IO\'E [ilSTiNG l,OTT., I:[• W.fBE!-l r:AP ffi \V fC:'.,ll~lO..TEDI\T n')Sff ~ 0 fU::r.!l!'.'i:131!(.h::tlGf<>jJI ;,:,IJAl ffi \::J PI..Ef. B-1 C--l AND C-b :;EE w (D AF.M0VF.r,Rur:5ve:cN[ilJ:TCL1PS SFF ~ © IIFl/,Ll TF.'IPORl'IRY IJEERIS C\:Rl/\l'l Latitude: 47.5005 N Latitude Longitude: -122.2159 W Longitude PROPOSED MAINTENANCE TASKS PLAN VIEW APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 80 NAME: Mark Clement PROPOSED: Bridge molntonance. IN: Cedar River NEAR/AT:Clty of Renton The Boeing Company SITE LOCATIDN ADDRESS: COUNTY: King STATE: WA SHEET Sheet 7 of 9 Washington Department of Natural Resources City of Renton 737 Logan Ave. N. Renton, WA 98038 DATE: 11/6/09 1f 11 I I' II I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~:.:,·,·._,, •'i,YE"1L_ . 'f,_, ,•, >;E,' "''Ct 0 ' EXISTING Section: NE Section: 7 Township: 23 N Range: SE PURPOSE, DATUM: MLLW Bridge maintenance. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS, CAP REPAIR SCAI.E, N/A I ' b I •• ,, .. ~ . f=-.. I . .. I . I '• 1. CONDUIT SUPPORT SCAI.E, N/A Latitude: 47.5005 N Latitude Longitude: -122.2159 W longitude NAME: Mork Clement The Boeing Company SITE LOCA TlON ADDRESS, Washington Department of Natural Resources City of Renton 737 Logan Ave. N. Renton, WA 98038 f,,::r,,1c,•,'••\'..'lF.1~ 'c:••·;.'d , {,' 11.\i,l'•,· CIIT' fl S1~ NEW PROPOSED MAINTENANCE TASKS, CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW PROPOSED: Bridge maintenance. IN: Cedar River NEAR/ AT:Clty of Renton COUNTY, King STATE, WA SHEET Sheet 8 of 9 DATE, 11 /6/09 1' ,1 11 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I n•'i!'1·· i.'Jr,,'F>FTF ~e ·,· r~·.t~ EXISTING Section: NE Section: 7 Township: 23 N Range: SE PURPOSE, Bridge maintenance. DATUM, NGVD 29 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: GROUT REPAIR SCALE, N/A latitude: 47 .5005 N Latitude Longitude: -122.2159 W longitude NAME, Mark Clement The Boeing Company SITE LOCA TlON ADDRESS: Washington Department of Natural Resources City of Renton 737 Logan Ave. N. Renton, WA 98038 .,. 11,., ',••: ~· ·, ,•,IF"•\'I•• NEW PROPOSED MAINTENANCE TASKS, CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW PROPOSED: Bridge malntanance. IN: Cedar River NEAR/ATcClty of Renton COUNTY, King STATE, WA SHEET Sheet 9 of 9 DATE, 11 /6/09 •' 1' r I I I f I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I· I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A Species Lists I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I • I I I I I I I I I I I I Endangered Species Act Status of West Coast Salmon & Steelhead Sockcyc Salmon (Oncnrh_1nd,m nerka) Chinook Salmon (0. l.<hah1·1scha) Coho Salmon (0. kisu/c/,) Chum Salmon (0. ke/11) Sleelhead (0. mykis.,') Pink Salmon (0. gorbu.<clw) ,f,,,,,'1,.//1,!, l .• '.""'I _ Snake River. .± _ Ozcuc Lake . 3. . Baker Ri\'cr 4 _ Okanogan River ~~~~-"._\'_c1!a'.~.1!.£~ --~-_ Q_ui1mlt Lake __ Lake Plcasanc 9 JO II 12 13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 S~c~a.m_cn1p ~ivcr Wintcr~_nm Up~r 1'.;ol(H'!b.!a Riycr Spring-run Snakc.~jv!'r Springl_Sn1_11mcr-nm Snake River Fall-run Puget ~o~m~ _Lowcr __ i;:01u_n~b.i.~ .. !hv.cr ~ppe~_ \Vi_lJ.a_~111;!lc Riyc_r CCJ!lral V_allcy ~p~ing-run Caljf(lf!!i~ c,mtal Ccn_lral Voll~Y. Foll and Late Fall-run Upper K.1~!!'~.t.h-.Tr_i!li.ty R_i_-:_crs ()r~g!J,ry l'.~~sl ~as~ingt?n .~·oa~( /1.Jid.dk ~ol111nbia. River ~pring-n,m !!PP:c.!".CJ.l.!_ll!)_~!t.i~~~.s:11!'.i:11.':!/fa!l-_n,.n. S,:m_th5i:_n ()~cg~'! .~nd 1:J?!'!h<:i:n C:3!ifo.mia C_<_>ast Deschutes River summer/fall-run 25 Cemral California.C.oast 26 27 '" 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 ' -~?'_,til~_O_n;s~,:i!J:,J?;!:l\c!!) C~lifi)m\a Lower Columbia River Oregon .. Coast~ _ Southwest Wa~hington Pugel S0und1S1rail of Georgia Olvmnic Peninsula _l-!_?~d_ C~_n_~! -~.l;!ll.~':'.!;T~':'!_'! .~o.Iu~b_(~}~)v.c!: Pugel. Sound/Slra.i_t of Georgia. Pacific Coast S~rn.l~~f!l S"a!i.f <.>i:ri.ia Uppc~Cohnnbia Ri~:er. Ccnlral California Coas1 -~!:!!!.l~ ,<;:~n!•.~.1.c.~l.if?'.."il! fo.~~t .s~~~.c)\i.-:.cu~~-sj!l_ Lower Columhi.a River . California Cenlral Valley . Uppc! Willamcuc River _ _ Middle _Columbia River • Northern California _ Oregon Coasl. _Soulhwcsl Washington Olympjc Peninsula_ Pugel Sound Klamath Mountains Prol'ince 51 I Eve~~)'.~~! 52 Odd-vcar j C11rre111 Enda11gered.' SpedesAct Li.,·tillll Sta1tis' I ,-1·-I, ,. •,/ I I .Nol War1w11ed Nol Warramed -l--. :::··::::~:::~::: I Nol Wurrrm1ed --__ 4Jl.li!®:inl - /_11,1,,,,i:,·,,.1_ "'=----·-~'='as =·' ... -,;·~ _Jfl~H!JJ __ .N_ol (Y_q(T'!(1.!f1. _N_o_1. W~1:1_Y!!!!<:d _N~( ~'ai"!W.11".:i Ng/ Wa!·m,!led Nol Wa_rrunieJ Ng1 !J'!'r!'O.'!!!.cf. Nol Warrrmlrd ' . ,.,. ... , 1 ESA Listing Actio,is Under Review -l=======slic• Cril.ical. habitn1 Umfr1rrminr,I _i-§Jl~df'.) ti(~~ Nnl H'arnmlrd ,/, "''" I _ Nol Warrunled __ Nol W,wrmurd ~~ ... ·: ·-,, ' --~ .. ·.·.·.·.· -·~ I -, -r·\JIJ'£&!!/._(,'f!.!!!.J/IJ_ --t!2!..!f<!l.!!!.!.1~'P_ - Nr,/ Wwmnled I r: I Nol Worrun1ed ___ Nr,1 Won·on,u!d Nol Wmnmted Critica_l habitat. The ESA defines a "species" to include any distinel population scglllcnt ofany species of vertebral~ fish or wildlife. for Pacifk salmon. NOAA Fisheries Service considers an evolu1ionarily significant 11ni1, or ··ESU,'" a "species" under the ESA. For Pacific stcclhcnd. NOAA Fisheries Service has delineated distinct population scgmcnls (DPSs) for considcrat,on as "species" under the ESA. ,1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I I I I I I I Six;cics li~lcd in \Vashing1on based on published popula1ion da1a n~ IN1aa111•01: ~ ~IP®tD®$ R®lp)@ri~ Environmental Conservation Online System Species listed in Washington based on published population data Noles: o This report shOws lhe species listed in lhis state a-ccording to the Federal Register listing desail)lion. o Thls lisl does not include experimental populations al'ld simaanty ol appeara nee listings. Page l of2 • This lisl includes species or p01)ulatlons under the sole Jurisdlctkln of the National Marine Fisherios S~rvicc. • Click on lhe highlighted scientific names below to view a Species Profile for each listing. Listed species (based on published population data) -44 listings Animals -35 listings S.tal1tS Spoelos/Llsllng Name E Alt>atross. short-talle<l (f/Jqf!J,asttja (=QLO!'!!!ltOil} a/l)atrus) T T E E E T T T T E T E T T T E T T T ,. Sear, grizzly lo~r 48 Stales, except where listecl as an experimental population or deltstod ( Ufs11s arc.to.s /rOrdbJ//l;) T T Buuerfly, Oregon silverspot (SpQYSJ.rlfJ zem@ l!JppoJytal Cartbou, woodla<'d Selkirk Mountain populalioo (Ra_ng/_f.o_r l!lt•!l!Q!'.s ciJ_rl/)_011) Curlew, Eskimo (~l!l!l.&l!.IJUtb0!81lll$) Deer. Columbian white-tailed Columbia River OPS (Qdocollous_v/rg/nlanus /oucurus) Lynx, Canada (Conllguous U.S. DPS)(!-.1mi_canJ1:d.!l!!Sl/i) Murrelet, marbled CA, OR, WA (8_m,;l!yrnmp/J.11um1m1Q_f1!f!!J•) Oller. southern sea except where EXPN (fi_llhyqfJ'_/J!frl~u1.e1.1.@M Owl. r>Ot1hem spotted ($_1.d~..!2l'.!ild..91m1.{luu1l!!!JJ!!) Pelican, brown except U.S. Allanlic coast FL. AL (e.11/eeanu~occidenta!l~) Plover, weslern snowy Pacific coastal P<JP. (@mJ1driJ!!Lllle.1111ndrlnus nlVQ~S) Rabbi!. pygmy Columbia Ba&in DPS (8("!!c/iy/11gus /d.fJ!•.o.•m11/s) Salmon, cl1inook Puget Sound (Onc01:hynchus (:Solmo) tshawytscha) Salmon. chinook fall Snake R. (Oncorhynehus.(:S11lmo) 1s1JawYf$cli11) Salmon. cllinook lowo1 Columbia R. (Q.nco,:hynchus (::Sa/mq).t:;hawytscha) Salmon. Cllinook spring upper Columbia R. (Onc.orhynchus (:Sa/mo) 1t;h11wyt&a/111) Salroon. Chinook spring/summer Snake R IQm;orttynchus. (;;S111mo). tshaw.v.tsc/la) Salmon. chum Columl>ia R. (Pnco.rl1Ym:h11$..(:S.11/mo).k11ta) Salmon. chum summClr-run Hood Canal (01Jcorl]ync:h11s.l::$11/mo) 111>111) Salmon, coho Lower Columbia River (Onc:.orhynohus (r,SoJmo) ~11!1/lr:h) Salmon. sockeye U.S.A. (Ozette Lake. WA) (Q.m,o.chynr;.hus (!:.S.11/.m.o) mtr~o) Soo tur11e, groon except where endangered ( Cho/Qn/1vnydo11) http: I lcco~. fws.gov/1css __ pu hli c/puhistillc Listing l 111.lh•id ua 1.jsp?stale"' WA &st atus=listt-<l 10/26/2009 II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Species liskd in Washington based on 1>ublishcd population dal.i E Sea tur11e, leiitherbaclt (/)Jt!II.!oc.twy~ c.o.rJqc;_gg) T Sea-lion, Stelle< eas!em pop. (Eumetom_ss Jubatus) E Sea-lion, Stelle< western pop. (Eumotg,[aqjub!ltu11) T Steelhead Puget Sound DPS (9.n~o,:h_Y,~hus (P.S.11/mJ!)J!lY!is.s) T S!eell>ead Snake R. Basin ( f.11.!P.P!hY.ll!:hl}~ (i:S..11/mO)_myi!IJl!i) T Steelhead lower Columbia R. (0..flc.or/!y_nchus f<;_Sollil9)J!1Y!/ss) T Steelhead middle Columbia A.. (OM.!>lt!Y.!!!hllS_/';S{l/m_oJ_my:l;!l~s) T Steelhead upper ColL,mbla R. Basin (Q.nco,rhym;J,1,15_(;,,S.a/J!J.OJ.1!1YM$s) T Troul, bull U.S.A .. conterminous. lowe, 48 states (S.@IY'llinu_s C!ln.f!.u,mtus) E Whale, humpback (~ega~tor11 novao1mgJ/110) E Whalo, killllf So\Jthnrn Resident DPS ( O~Jm1s_D~11) E Wort. gray Lower 46 Sillies, except where delisted and whore EXPN. Mexico. (Canis lupus) Plants -9 listings Status Species/Listing Name T Catchny, S~aldlng's (S:/lcml1.$Rfil!!'f11g/11 T Checker-mallow. Nelson's (/ilcf.i!iC.118. 1111lso11Ja.na) E Checkermallow, Wenatchee Mountains ( SUtn~J1JLO!f191!11J! V/IJ, 11_1!/,r<!) E Desert-parsley, Bradshaw's ll.,~m111lll!ll.lm1.<1),ll-'!'tY/IJ T Howollla, waler (/:lowo!/JJUlQIIJlll/1~) T Laoies'-tresses, Ute (Sllir.l!tl.lMJI /llluv}sl/Ji) T Lupine, Kincaid's (y,p/nu~.1H11J?h_11f!lJ1~ (;:0rn9onus)_S$P., l</m;_1,1Jdli (=var. ll/nc11/d//)) T Paintbrush. golden (Gi!f.lJ!lp}a_.le.vf,;_"to) E S!ickseed, shc,wy (/:la_c_1<el/11_'tl,OllCJSfJ1) las! updaled: October 26, 2009 ECOS .Homo I Contact U$ hi (J):1 /ccos. fws.gov /tess rub I ic/pu o/stateL i sti nl! 1 ml i ,. i dun I, jsp'!statc0 W A&s!atus~ I isled Pugc 2 of2 l 0/26/2009 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I r I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILOUFE PRIORITY HABIT ATS AND S!'ECIES POI. YOON CROSS REFERENCE REPORT IN THE VICINITY OF T23ROSE SECTION 7 Report Olllll: S6ptemtler 11. 2009 Priority Hebilllls 1111d Species (PHSJ po(ygoos 8111 lalleled, on lhe rmip, with e unique number (PHS Poly#) and '••symbol, roughly in lhe cen1er 01 lhe polygon. This PHS Ptlly# refers to a lisl or loon manbers (Form/I) canlalRcd In lhe PHS Polygon Cross Referanoe Report, listed below. The Fannrrs relef to tile 8ll8ched Priority Habllats and Species Pol'/gon Rllport. This report dollllls each species or liabllat depicted as a pol)'gon on lhe fl18J). Them Will 1'e 60me polygoM, on lhe map, wi!Jlool PHS Poly# labels. These areas era "no dala" or 'donuls' created by surroond:ng polygons. 1hl!$II polygons indicate Iha! lhe species or habital lnformallon Is urmlll\Wl or lhe area was not ffllljlpOd. PHS Poly# 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 FOIIII# 903662-902~5 915039 90366'2 902723 902723 915029 903661 903661-903664 903661 ·90JG64-902726 90311161 902030 902688 902505 902688 II I I I I I I I I r I r I r I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT Of FISH AND WILDLIFE PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES POLYGON REPORT IN TI-IE VICINln' OF T2:IR05E SECTION 7 Report Dale: Seplember 11, 2009 ln!of(llj)txln Ahoul Priority Habitats end Polygon RepQM POO<ity Habilal$ alld Species (PHS) potrgQns a:e labeled, on lhe map, wilh e 1mlqoo 1111mber (PHS Po1)11J and •+• symbol, rougl!ly In lhe ainlllr of 1ho pofygon. This PliS Poly# refers 10 a !isl or pofygon numbers and form n~ml>ers (Foon#) contlllnlld In lho PHS Polygon Cross Releranoo Report. The Form/rs role, lo Iha PHS POiygon Report, nsied below. This ropon details each spilcle,s or habllal depleled as a pct;gon on Iha map. Prionty Habjlats and §eecies Pqlv990 SumroalY bill\ This repon and IM accompan)itlg maps ooolafn species afld hllbltals lhlll are considered IX> be piiorlUes for conse:vatjon 211d mruiagoo,ent by Washillglon Oepartrmml of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW]. The mosl c,,rron1 Prlorily Hallital aoo Species Lisi is available on our web site al hlloJJw.wi,wqfw.wa.govJhab /phsijr,1.h)m. YES 01 Y under 1he 'Priority" colwnn In Iha Summary llsl belo'N lndicales lhe species or habnal ocanrenco Is Oil WDFWs Priority HabltalS anc Species lls1 (PHS). lhe OCCIJffOIICO 1111s boon re&ied to mah:h 1ho priority area tislod tonho spocios oc habllal en Uie PHS LISI (o.g .. ani ocanrence, b<eeding areas, regular conoonlnlUons). NULL 0/ B1il1lk ullder the 'Priatlty' column lndicalos lho species or halila1 o=ence is not on WOFWs PHS List. Prioriry Sllilo Status PHSCode Common Name S~clos Uso Crilorla YES MONITORED /\RHE GREAT BLUE HERON BREEDING OCCURRENCE YES SAC 8IOOIVERS1n' /\REAS AAD CORRIDOR YES RIPAA RIPAAIAN ZONES YES UNOS URBAN NATURAL Ol'EN SPACE YES WET WEllANDS PHS Polygoo Reoorj Form#: 9()203Al PHS Code: UNOS Scientific Name: Soason: Spe<:m Use Critll11a: Ptlorlty: YES Slato Stlltus: Sito Name: SEAffiE Cln' PARKS !VARIOUS). Genoral Description: SEA me CITY PARKS. Common Namo: URBAN NATURAL OPEN SPACE Accurmcy: ACCURATE WITiilN A QUARTER MILE fcdoml Status: Soun:& Date: 91 Souroo: MULLER, TED: Wr;JW; PERSONAL OBSERVATION. Source Codo: PROF Synopsis.: HAVE PERSON/\U Y VISITEO MOST OF THE CITY PAAl(S OVER A 30 YEAR PERIOO. FOfm#: 902505 PHS Code: RIPAR Season: Species USG Critoria: Priority: YES Stalo Slatus: Sito Namo: MAY CREEK RIPARIAN AREA General DeKrlpUon: MIXE.O FOREST RIPARIAN ZONE Scientlffc Name: Common Namo: RIPARIAN ZONES Ac:curracy: ACCURATE WITHIN AOUARTER MILE federal Status: Source Date: 04 91 Source: OPPERMAN, TONY WOW: PERSON/IL OBSERVATIONS. Source Caci&: PROF Synopsis: VISITS TO THE AREA WHILE DOING $EPA REVIEW, I I' I I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PtjS pPlygon Report Form#: 902525 PHS Code: WET Season: Spocles Use Crllvria: Priorily: YES Slllle Sll!tus: Sl111 Harne: GREEN RIVER WETI.ANOS (LOWER RIVER). Scientllic Name: Common Name: WETtANOS Ac:curracy: ACC.URA TE Wn'HIN A QUARTER Mll.E Federal Sb1lU$: General Description: VARIOUS TYPES Of WETt.ANOS THROUGHOUT THE LOWER GREEN RIVER VALLEY (DOWNSTREAM FR OM FLAMING GEYSR PARK). SOME Of n!ESE Al.SO HAI/E OPEN WATER COMPONENTS. Soun:a Daio: 91 Scun:e: MULLER, TEO: ET AL: WOW. SCS. AND COUNTY. Soun:e Code: PROF Synopsis: WHY OF THESE SITES HAI/E BEEN VISITED SY FIELD STAFF. Source Dato: 12 90 Source: l<ING COUNTY SENSmve AREAS MAPS. Soun:e Codt: GSMAP Synopsis: A USGS BASED r,w, SYSTEM ill.so USING NW! INFORMA TIOH. Form#: 902688 Stuon: Speclea Uae Crlwria: PHS Cadir. UNOS Priority: YES Stllle Slatus: SIie N.ame: CEDAR RlVER VALLEY OPEN SPACE AREAS Sclootlnc Name: Common Name: URBAN NA TVRAL OPEN SPACE Acl:urracy: ACCURATE WITHIN A QUARTER MILE Federal Stalvs: Gonorul Ooscrlptlon: STEEP FOOESTEO SLOPES ANO HIGH GRAOIENT RIPARIAH AREAS. TiiESE ARE MOSTLY UHSTABL E SLOPE AREAS WHICH SHCIUl.O 8E LEFT UNCLEARED. PROVIDE HABITAT FOR MANY Al/WI AND TERRESffiW. SPP. THESE AREAS Al.SO CONTAIN RIPARIAN HAlllTATS. Sourco Dato: 04 91 Source: M\11.1.ER, TEO, WOW; PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS. Source Code: PROF Synopsis: MNfY ORIVE·BY VISITS TO THIS AREA OVER A PERIOD OF SIXTEEN YEARS. Formf: 902723 SGason: Species Uae Cfileria: PHS Code: WET Prlorit)': YES S1alll Status: Slte NalNI: St.ACK RIVER WETLANDS. Scientific Name: Common Namu: WETIAHOS Acc:umicy: ACCURATE WITHIN A QUARTER MILE Federal Status: Gonornl D0icrlp4lon: SCRUS SHRUB AND EMERGENT WETtANOS. AA£.A IHOLUOES PANTHER LAKE. Sourct OIIIAI: 041991 Source: OPPERMANN, TONY; WOW; Pl:RSOIW. OBSERVATION Soun:e Code: PROF Synopsis: SITES OBSERVED WHILE DOING SEJ>A REVIEWS. SOU1ce Dll\o: 12 90 Soun:e: KING COUNTY SENSITIYE AREA MAPS. Source Code: GSMAP Synopsis: MAPS MSEO ON NWl MAPS. Fonnl: 902726 Souon: SU PHS Code: A.RHE Spedoa Use Crllerla: BREEDLNG OCCUAAENCE Priority: YES Stalll StalUII: MONITORED Slle NalM: St.ACK RIVER HERON COtONY Sclenffllc Neme: AROEA HEROOIAS Common Name: GREAT SWE HERON Acc:umicy: ACCURATE WITHIN A QUARTER MILE Fadoral Slalus: Genenl Descrlpllon: NEST COLONY ON ISLIIND IN SCS PONDS AT Ill.ACK RII/ER PUMP STATION. FIRST NOTED 19ll:i. 1990: 30.37 NESTS: 1991: 25-:14 NESTS: 1996:0 > 37 NESTS> 17 JINENILES. Soul'QJ Date: 020391 Sourte: WOWNONGAME DATA SYSTEM QUARTERLY Ul'OATE Sollfl)II Codo: LIT Synopals: ANNUAL DATA SUPPLIED BY SUE KROM. SEA TTI.E AUDUBON SOCIETY. Source Date: 102596 Source: KROM SUZANNE; SEAmE AUDUBON SOCIETY. Sourte Code: LOCAL Synopsis: HERON COI.ONY UPDATE BASED ON FREQUENT OSSERVATION OF SITE. [ I I I [ I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PMS Polygon Beoort formO: 900661 &!a1en: Species Use Crilllrta: PHS Code: UHOS Priority: YES Stale Status: Site Name: RENTON RIPARIAN FOREST Sc1Mliflc Name: Ccmmon Name: URBAN NATURAL OPEN SPACE Ac,wmicy: ACCURATE WITHIN A QUARTER MILE Fodoral Sllltus: Genenil 008Cl'lptlon: URBAN OECIDUOUS RIPARIAN FOREST (COTTONWOOO; ALOER; MAPLE). GREAT BtuE If.ERON COLON\' ON SITE. USED BY MANY WATERFOWL (BUFFLEHEAD: MAU.ARDS; SCAUP; WlGEON; OREEH-WINGEO TEN.; OAOWALL; ETC.) BALO EAGLE FEEOlNG AREAIIIO ScurceOaw: 10 96 Source: KROM SUZANNE;SEAffiEAUOUBONSOCIE'TY. Soorce Cede: LOCM. SVnopsls: FREQUENT VISITS TO SITE OVER SEVERAL YEARS. Soim:G DIiie: 102596 Source: GOI.OSMJTH MARK; WOFWPERSONAL OBSERVATION Solll'QI Code: PROf SVnopsls: HIKEO TKROUGH AR!:11.. Form~: 903862 Sm0fl: Species UM! Criteria: PHS Code: UNO$ Priority: YES Smlo Stalu,: Slla Name: RENTON DECIDUOUS FOREST SclenlHic Na111i!: CommOfl _Norne: URBAN NATURAL OPEN SPACE Accumcy: ACCURATE Wffi!IN A QUARTER MILE FeclGrnl Status: Genon!I DesMptlOfl: DECIOUOUS FOREST SLOPING DOWN TO WETI.AND. MAPLE; AlOl:R: COTTONWOOD: SCATTERED CONIFERS. Sourco Doto: 1025mi Source: GOtOSMITH MARK; WDfW Pl:RSONAL OBSERVATION. Source Code: PROF Synopsis: SITE VISIT Forml: 903864 Soaaon: Species Us_e Criteria: PHS Code: WET PriOllty: YES State Slalus: Srtil Name: Ill.ACK RIVER RIPARIAN WETLAND Scientlflc Name: Common Nllllla: WETLANDS Accumlcy: ACCURATE WITHIN A QUARTER MILE Fodera! Status: General Oncrlpllon: RIPARIAN FORESTED WETLAND .. DECIDUOUS COVER OF COTTONWOOO; ALOER: MAPLE. SITE HAS ACTIVE GREAT BLUE HERON COLOMY AHO IS USED BY MANY WATERFOWi.. SITE CONTAJHS HISTORIC CHANNEL OF BLACK RIVER AND IS WITHIN ITS HlSTORIC FLOODPLAIN. SOIJl'Qlllale: 041991 Source: OJ'PERMANH TOHY:WOFW PERSONAL OBSERVATION. Source Coda: PROF Synopsb; SITE OSSERVEO WHILE DOING SEPA REVIEW. Source Dalli: 102596 Sourae: GOLDSMITH MARK: WDFW PERSONAL OBSERVATION. Sourae Code: PROF Synopsl,: SllE VISIT Sourae Dute: 12 90 Sourco: IOIIIG COUNTY SENSITM AREA MAPS Source Code: GSMAP Synopsis: MAPS BASED ·oo NWI MAPS FormO: 915029 Season: Spedos UM Criteria: PHS Code: BAC Piiotlly: VES Slalo Status: Site HDll1i!: LAKERIOOE PARK· SEAffiE Sclanlffic Nome: Common Name: Biod'rverslty Aieas am! Comdor Accunacy: ACCURATE WITHIN A OI.IARTER MILE Federal S1atus: General Do&ctlptlon: ST ANDS OF DEC1D_UOUS AND MIXED CONIFER-DECtDUOUS WITH DIAMETERS OF 5 TO 30 INCHES • SNAGS, DOWNED LOGS, SEEPS. AND WETLANDS PRES91T. ALSO NESTING BALO EAGlE PRES£ NT. Sourco Dale: 041106 Sourco: WILDLIFE SURVEY DATA MANAGEMENT, WOFW Source Code: SURV Synopsis: OATA COLI.ECTI:D DURING WILDLIFE SURVEYS. If i I' I I I I I I r I I I r i I ll fl I I I I I I I I I I PHS Pol¥oon Rooort Sourco Date: 052499 Source: SEAmE URSAN NATURE PROJECT -SI.IHI' Source Code; SURV Synopsis: THE SEAmE URBAN NATURE PROJECT MAPPED VEGETATION TYPES PRESEHT IN SEATTlES PAR KS. GREENBELTS, AND OTHER PUBLIC OPEJtl SPACES. SEE SUNP FOR Pl.ANT COMPOSITIONS. Fffllll/: 915039 PHS Coclo: BAC Season: Species Uaa Crltorla: Priority: YES Slato Slatu1: Site Name: SKYWAY 01'1:N SPACE-SfAffiE Sclontifie Name: Common Name: Bl~ Areas and Conidor Accuinley: ACCUAA TE WITHIN A QUARTER MlLE filderal Sllltus: G~nerul Description: FORESTED RAVINES WITH lNTERMITIENT STREAMS. CLOSE PROXIMITY TO HEAVU. V FORESTED LAKERIDGE PARK. MAPPED BY THE CITY OF SEATTI.E AS HAVING WETI.AHOS ANO A RIPARIAN CORRIDOR RUNHING THROUGH IT. Source Date: 070809 Source: CITY OF SEA me DPO GIS Source Codo: MAP Synop5ls: OHUNE MAPPING APPI.ICA TION SHOWS AAEA AS HAVING WETLANDS AND RIPAAWI CORRIDOR. f I f I I I I I I I I I I E I E I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PHS Pg/yegg Reoort Codes Used In Pnori1v Hll!Jlml and SpeCil!s Polygon Repotl Fotmli: Unlqt.r0 flllnlb!lr tlwit links Ille lnformaUon in Iha reporls lo fe.iluies on lhe roop. PHS Code: This conlaills a codo that identifies ~,o fish aoo 1"6:!llfc species lotJnd In u10 area or 1110 habitat U1at ocxurs th~. The fio!d Common Namo conlaios the de$C/iJ)lion o.1 this code. Scientific Name: Scientific name of the species. S41ason: Se;isoo of Sjledes use. Use is indicated by tho presence o1 a non-blank charac:11!1 In ono or moro poslions or sub-strings of the field posi1iD11. Posiliotl 1: W. WiMer use. Posi!loo 2: S = Spring use. Posi:ion 3: U • Sttmmor use. Pooilloo 4: F • Fahse. Pos/tiO<l 5: S = Severe wintei US8. Common Name: Common name of the Sjl<lcies or habitat SpecM1$ Use Criteria: Q~o1la lhat ilfonlifios how the area Is i,slld ll'y the indicated spe~s. This litild is nol usod If a habital Is dosalbod. Accuracy: Mapp:ng acwracy of 111'! me delinealio<l as delemmed by lho mapper. Priority: Species and hatilnts that a,o consloored to be p:lorllles for consel'llailon and managemenl by Waslllngtoo Oepartniont oJ Flslt a.id \lj\ldlife (WOfl'I). The most rurrcnt Priollly Habllal and S~ List Is available on our web sile el hl1p11www.wdlw.wa.goylhablphs/isl.hlm, YES or Y = lndicatllS lho spocillS or hal>ilBI occurrence Is on WOFWs Pliorily Habi1BIS alld Species Lisi (PHS). Tho ooco1ionoo has blron roOned to matcil th!! ptiorily area !isled lo: lhe spocios or hab\tal oo tho PHS Lisl (e.g., any oo:urrence. brooding aroos. rll1)1Jlar oonoontrations). NULL or Bl.Ink • Indicates Iha Sjlecies or habitat occurrenoo is not oo WOFWs PHS lis.t. Stato S1atus: S1a1e listir,g slalus ol species. fcdorol Status: Federal listing $latus ol species. Site Name: Namo assigned to ille area baslld generally on a local place name. General D1t11crlplion: Descripllon a!Jout lhe area, induding how Is is used Md why II is Import.mt. S0u1ce Date: D.lto ot so.rroe of inlormalioo. Source Codo: Code lde<ttitylng lhe source ol lnhlrmalion. Source: Iden lilies alld descflilos the souri;e responsible for Ille information described on Ille fl)llll or drawn oo the map. Si1rglo Of mulUplo sourCllS may bo cited. Synopsis: Brtel narrative drm,il:illg ()Q(ltent of source of inlomialion. I I I I I I I I I I f I I I / I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I • I I I I I I WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WllDLlfe WlLDllFE POINTS AHO AREAS FROM THE WILOUFE SURVEY DATA MAHAflEMENT (WSOM) OATABAS1:. IN THE VICINITY OF T23ROSE SECTION 7 Repoo Dale: Seplembef 11, 200El Wildllfll polnls and meas on lhe ITilql can be referenced lo this report II)' noli1191he oca1rpolnlkl or occurpolykl numbel wt111m the)' OCQJr on Ille map, and llltm 100ldng up [he inlormalklf1 lisled below. This report Is sooed II)' Ille ocaapolnlld alld oocull)Cllykl and pnwlcles dell& on each species on 1he map. The infoonatiQn displayed on 1he map and In file mpor1s, rrom tho Wlkme Sl!rvey Dala MMagemenl Oalllbase, only lndudes !fJ8tk!s lha1 8!ll r.onsldered to be priorilies for COllBelVlllion alld mamgemool by Wll$lt:nglon 0$pa,1men\ ol Flsll and Wildlife. Priority spedes include illllo e11dangered, Threalened, Sens!IMJ and Candlda1o; vulnerable aggregatioos ol specie::;; and &pedes ol recreationa~ commen:ial andlot lrtblll lmporW!oit Iha! em wlAOO!ble, all other spedes from lltla database have boon exduood. )WdlJJe Spades f'ssJt Summary Ust This report and 1he a=npan)'il19 ma,p, cont.ain spedes « habllals lllal atll oon:sideted to be prion1ies lor ~ and rnanegement by WBsmngtoo Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDfWl. The most cumm1 PrlO!ily Habitat and Spedes Us1 Is ava!lable on our woo silll at hll!):llwww.wdlt,,.wa.go,JtJabr phstisl.hlm. YES or Y lndlca1es l'1ll spocios or hablla1 Is on WOFWs Priorily Hablt:als and Spedes (PHS) Lisi. You wl!I need lo constl'l lllll Lisi 11$91110 'l'llrll\y \Wlelher a SjlB(ific oocwrence al the r;pedes or habltal Is awisidered a priority; tho List delrles spedlit prtcrity areas for soma &pecil3$ (e.g., Weslem Washlriglon Oflly, breedlng areas or mlgrelkm carridors only). ,Null or Blank indlceles lhe &pedes or hilbll.at oocurrence is no1 on WOfWs PHS li$1. PriOtity State S1atm Speclas Codo Common Name Occur Type Occur Class YES SelSfTNE HALE BAI.D EAGI.E NEST BREEOING OccurpolnUO: Occurpom1ID: Occurpoln11D: Wl!dllrit Saeci88 PoJnts 63481 Specie11 CodCI: HALE SGlontlRa Mamo: HallaeelllS IBIJCO<:IIPhalll!I Priority: YES Verify Status: Verified Common N11111e: Bald eagle Occur Type: Nesl Occur Class: Breeding Slalo Status: SMsilMl Elfort l>llle: 0!111/2006 Elfott Date Accurate To: Day Federal Siatua: Fed Spp Concern T ownship.Range&cUon: T23-0N R4.oE S01 SIio Nam&: DEAOHORSE CANYON Occurrence#: 1550 Seciuenee#: 1 lacaUon Ac:cum:y: 114 mHe (Quarter Sed:1on) Occur Nol111: BALO EAGLE NEST IN SNAG-TOPPED OLO-GR<YIYTH 0. FlR lt-4 DSAOHORSE CANYON.1.AKERJDGE ?AAK. NEST OIRECTL Y BEHlNO 10501 RUSTIC RD. GPS LOCATION UTM 10 556815, 526,760 NAO 27. 63482 Species Code; HALE &tlen1lllc Name: Haliaeelw leiuoocephllluis PrlOrlty: YES Vtrlfy Sllilus: Verified Comr1111n Name: Ba!:! eaglo Oceur TY1JO: Nest Occur Clau: Breeding Slaht Status: Seflsl1il>e Effort Date: 05/25t2006 Effort Om Accurato To: Day ~ Status: Rid Spp Concern Townahlp,Rang&.$e~lon: T23:0N R4--0E $01 SIie Name: OEAOHORSE CANYON Occurrencd: 1550 Soq:OOIICG#: 2 . Location A.ccuracy: 114 mlla (O!Jal'lllr Section) Occur Notes: BALD EAGLE NEST IN BRYN MAWR RAVINE. IN CONl:FER, CAN 0E SEEN FROM RAINIER AVES AHO 84nl A.VE (S OF 84TH AVE). NEST TREE IS NEAR PARKING AREA. 63544 Speclas Codo: HALE ScfGnURo Namo: .Halia11ews loococ:epha!u$ Priority: YES Verify Sllilus: VeriRed Common Name: Bald eagle Occurlypo: No$1 Occur Clim: Bleeding Slllt11 Status: &!nsillvo Ellorl Dale: 01/0112008 Effort Dall! Acwta18 To: Year F4defal Sla\Us: fed Spp Concern Towmhlp,Rllngo-Soceon: T23,,0N R4·0E S13 SIie Name: BLACK RIVER Occurrencel: 161 o · Seq11tnct#: 1 location Accuracy: 114 mne (Calal'lllr S&dion) Occur Nolft: BAI.D EAGLE NEST IN COTTONWOOD IN GREAT BlUE HERON COLONY. AIR OPS: E 557409 N 5258144 UTM NAD27 IS FMRL Y ACCURATE. 2005: PAIR IN NEST. THEN FEMALE DEAD IN NEST: I.W.E STAYED, EVENT. ASANO. 2007 LOC Ul'OATE PG 4004. I I; 1 I I I I I 1 I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I i I I I OccurpolnUO: 63545 Species Code: HALE Sclontlllc Name: Heliaeetus feucocephalus Priority: YES Verify Status: Verified Common Name: Bald eagle Oc,c;ur Type: Nest Occur Clan; Brooding Stale Status: Sensllivo Effort Dalo: 01/0112000 Effort Date Accurate To: Vear Fedoral Stetus: Fed Spp Concern Townshlp-RJ!ng&-Set1lon: 123--0N R4-0l: S14 Sile Name: BLACI< RIVER Occummcc#: 1610 Sequenoe#: 2 Location Accumcy: 1/4 mlle {Quarter Sec1ioo) Occur Not&s: BAl.D EAGLE NEST tt4 TOP OF TOPPED DOUGLAS FIR AT TOE OF SLOPE IMMED. ADJ TO STORMWATER Ol;T, PONO. FIR IS S OF TWO FIRS. NEST HIDDEN IN SECONDARY LEADERS. G GPS 556565 E 525851!4 N UTM NAD27 FT. NEIGHBOR SAYS AC1WE/PRODTIVE SINCE 2000 W1x!life Species Areas Summarv Usi Th!s repgrt IIJld 1"11 uocompanya,g maps conlain spcaos or habitats lilllt are oo!ISl!ered to be priorities for conservation and managomenl tv1 Washington Department ol Flsll und Wlldtife (WOfW}. The mosl l>llrenl Priority Habilal and SpeclllS LISI ill available on our web si'.e al h~p1lwNw.wdlw.wa.gov/habl phsllst.hlm. VES « Y illdh:alAIS lhe species or habilal is on WOfWs Ptiority HllbitaCS and Species (PHS) Lisi. You l>iU need to 00!\$\Jtt the List ilM!ll to 'l'Cri~y wllelluir a speo<.ie ocairrellC9 ol tho spodllS or habita1 lsoonsldefed a prtonfy: 1he List defines specific prlori1y areas for scrne species (e.g .. Westm Washlnglon only, breeding areas or mlgralloo OClfridors only). Null or B11111k indicates the specie, Of habitat oocurronce is nol on WOfWs PHS Li$1. Priority State Status Species Code Common Namo Occur Type Occur Cr~s• YES MONITORED ARHE GREAT BLUE HERON COLONY BREEDING Wildf.io Silecies Ar0jl$ Occu~gonlD: P194 Spocl1111 Code: ARHE ScklnUflc Name: Arooa hmodlas P1lorlty: YES Verily Slllt1111: Nol wlflod Common Name: Greal blue heRM Occtrr Typo:Calorry Occur Cius: Breeding State Status: Mcnilored Effort Data: 04/16/2006 Effort Dato Accurate To: Day Fedt181 Status: TOWMhlp,Rllngo-Socllon: T23--0N R4-0E S 13 Site Namo: BLACK RIVER Occvmmcell: 178 Sequeni:G#: 1 Location Acc:uracr, Stand.In:! bufler Occw Note11: GREAT BLUE HEROH COLONY, OH ISLAND IN $CS PONDS NEAR OLD EARLINGTON GOLF COURSE. ACT .a5;7NESTS.S6;9NESTS.87;22-ll8;24$',30 TO 37-90:DATA '87-'90 FROM SUE KROM, SEAffiE AUD . .16NESTS; 2ACT NESTS-92;93 4-5 ACT NESTS: 94-14 ACT NESTS; 96-25 ACT II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Codes Used In Wildlife Polnls ru,d Areas Report Occu rpolntlDIOccurpolntpolylD: A unlquo idcnlloor IOI each rocord. Species Code: Alphanumeric code which hlentifies lhe 5fl8cies by using Washinglon Depallmenl al Fish nnd Wildlilo's slandllrd spcdes codes derived lrom genus and l;flecies. The !aid Common Name CO!llalns Ille dEsl:tipUon ol tll!s code. Sclontlflc Namo: ScienUf,c namo or tho spoclos. Priority: Species il!ld l\ab;tats IMI are considered lo be priorities ID! CO!lservation and management by Washington Oopanmonl ol Flsl! and Wildl:!!e (WOFW). The most curreni Priority Habilals and Species Lisi l11JVallable on ow web sire al hl1p1/www.wdfw.wa.govJhablphspage.h1nL YES o, V • Indicates ll!at Ille spedes o, llabllllt is on WOFW's Prlorily HablllJIS and Species [PHS) List Yoo wiD need to COO$lJU lhe list il$elf lo ,•erify whlllhllr a specific oocurrenee of lite SJ)e(ia& 01 habllllt is OOl'ls!dored a priorily; lhe List defines specif.: priority arfl'<!s for some species (o.g .• Wes!om IVi!Sllington only, breeding areas or migtlllilln Ctllrtilofs only}. NVU or Blall~ • il1dicates the sl)e(ies or habltal ocOJrre<!Qe Is ~ on WDFWs PttS List Verily Status: Roliabilily of lnf0tma1,oo_ Common Name: Common oamo of !he species. Occur TyJMt: Tho biological oo~ly 111a, is being obsl!Ned (ncsl, communal roos1 etc.). Occu, Class: Biological dassificalion of the oocure11ce. Suito Status: Siaill !isling stalus cl Iha spocios. Effort Date: Date an elllJl1 was condue1ed. Effort Dato Accurate To: Tho accuracy ol lllo daill. Federal Status: Federal listing slllus ol llie speoes. Townshlp,Rango-84clton: Tho logal de:seripciOn al Iha species ocrurronoo by townsllip, range, meridian, secb'on, quMer, and qlJllrtilll~rter soctlon. Site Name: 1''.me ol the site based ()fl locat\(lfl, Generally, lhe neares1 definable geographic place. Occurrence#: Nllmoor assigood sequen\ally ID occurrooees. Tho numbet is unique by species. Sequencell: Number assillged ,;equenlall)' to subgroups ror a given ow.irreJ1ce/otcuroo. Loe111lon Accurracy: LocauonaJ acruracy of llWI aata as ii was Ol>SA!rved. I Occur Notes: O::cure/llCe noles. I I I I I I 1' •' I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I ( I I I I I I •• I I I I I I I I I I etimili Bib el'8SGl'tat Fish Code !J!IICias Nama Stream Name SlmmWD ~la SUI\IIIVff CHFA Fan Chinook May Creek 1222101476287 05-00-27 CCT Resident Cutltvoot MliyCreak 1222101475287 04-12-07 SOCK Scdieye~ Miiyereet: 1222101476287 03-11-13 STWI Winier Slee!IMlad MayCreet: 1222101475287 IJ5..0S.27 Codes Used In The Prioljly f!Sh Pmsenoe Report Fish Coda; WOfYI unique O'.Jde lhat idonUfles cadl fish specie&. Tho field Species Narno COIIIB!ns Iha desaiptlon of !his code. SpaciH Narno: Common name o1 each fish species. Strenrn Nama: Stream name based on Iha US Geological Survey. Geographic Names lnfomlalion System dstllbase. Stream WD: Unique slnlam ldenllfier (IOJ IIOflBraled lrom Ille node laUlude and longiluda IOcalOd al a slNll!m's mooth. This 10 is lo be oone~ued only as an ID. and net nooessarily ae a reference to a Slrliam's locallon. Survey Oa1e: Dale Iha lnformaUon was SUIY6')'e(I. II 1' I I I I I I I E I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I 1· I I I I I I I I I I WASHJNGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH ANO WILOUFE PRIORITY FISH REPORT FROM THE WASHINGTON LAKES AND RIVERS INFORMATION SYSTEM (WLRIS) DATABASE IN THE VICINITY Of T23Rll6E SECTIOH 7 Soplombor 11, 2009 Information Abotul The f!M Pmsenca flepo,1 The fislt itllolmalioo In lhis rol)0'1 only lndudes Information thal Washington Depanmont ol Flsll lllld Wildlife (WOFW) mailllains in a cenlral comp- ulru da1al>ase. Thls Information only documonts tlt!l locall:Jn of Important fish rosou:ocs to tho ~I of our knowledge. fl Is not a complete lnvrm- lory of lhe fish species in the slate. The fish species listed below are OOJt:sidered to ba priclities for OOIISefYilliO<l 811d managemenl by Washinglon Dl!llilrlmenl ol Frsh arod W~fife. The mosl cumml PTiorily Habilal and Spwes I.isl is BYailllble on our web 5ite ol hl1p1lwww.wdfw.wn.9ovlhab/ phslisl.hlm. The occurrence has been relitled lo matcll lhe poority area risled for lhe species on !lie Priority Hablt.its and Spedos List (e.g. at1y OCCUJronca, llt'eeding areas. rogular concontratlorisj. Sliaams with priomy fish $!'Odes from Uui WLRIS databaoo are llighligllted on Uui IIWll!lpan)Ulg map. Oue to lhe complexity al dispfnylng linear fealurtl$ indM:rual species that uffl\ze each,;.,~ reach are no! dlsUnguishablo. If more species specific information Is neooed. useis should request digllaldala or conlllel tile \lj\,RJS dalnbase mllf\3ger. C;JII WOFW al {360) 902·2543 or a-man phsp1odllCls@dlw.wa.gov to find Oll1 how lo rl!quesl d.lgllal data or to get Information aboul U111 databaso mallagor. Slllte sla~rs inlolmatioo is nol ava~ble in the WI.RIS database for lllese species. Please see WOFW Spwes of Conrorn List f0< curronl slalus. For a copy of this Ii$!, <:onlncl WDFIV Endangered Species Seclio• al (360) 002-2515, 01 Ii rs avallallfo on our \\'Ob !ito al hUp:11.vwwwcitw.wa.g(w /wlmidl,Drsl)'lsoclsoc.11tm. Priori!): Fish Prnsence: FishCodo S!!!!cltls Numo S1roam Namo SIN!am LlfO Dale Su,veved COHO C<lllo Salmon \222626476087 05-00-27 DBT Dolly Vard,m/Bid Tr01l1 12226264:ffl087 05-01-10 CHFA Fall Ciinook 1222626476087 05.()6.27 CCT Resillenl Cullhroal 1222626476087 04-12-07 SOCK Socl<Al)'ll Salmon 1222626476087 03·11-13 STWI Winter Steelhood 1222626476087 05-06-27 COHO Coho Salmon Black RIYOr 1222505474742 05-06-28 CHFA Fall Chinook Black River 1222505474742 05-06-28 CCT Resident Cu1t11roa1 Black River 1222505474742 04-12·09 S1WI Winier Steelhead Black River 1222505474742 05..0.11-14 COHO Coho Salmon Cedar River 12225.90476452 05-06-27 OBT Dolly Vardllfllllull Trool Cedar Rlver 12225.90478452 05-01-10 CliFA Fall Ctllnool: Clldar River 1222590478452 05-06-27 CCT Rasid8111 Cu1fhroa\ Cedar River 1222590476452 04-12-07 SOCK Sodiaya Salmon Cedar Ri'illr 1222590478452 03-11-13 ST\Vj Winier Sieelllead Cedar River 1222590476452 05.00-27 COHO Coho Sarmon Ouwamish Rive, 1222ll00474993 05.00·28 oar Dolly Varden/Bull Trout Ouwamish River \222800474993 05-01-10 CttFA Fall Chlnooll Duwamish River 1222800474993 05.00·28 CHMF Fall Chum Duwamfsh River 1222800474993 04-01-23 PINJ< Pitlk Salmon Duwamlsll RIiier 12228004 74993 03-11-14 ccr RBSidl!ll, Cu~hroa1 Duwaml!I\ Rivlll 1222800474993 04-12·09 SOCK Sodeye Salmon Duwaml:!11 Rive, 1222800474993 03-11-14 STSU &,rnmer S1ee0iead Duwamls/1 River 12221100474993 05.().4-12 STWI WIIl1er Steelhead Ouwamish River 1222800474993 05,04,14 COHO Coho Salmon Green RiveI 1222505474752 05.(16-28 DBT DcDy Va:rden/Bull Trout Green Rivet 1222505474752 05-01-10 CHfA Fan Chinook Green RM!t 1222505474752 lla-OEl-28 CHMF FaflChum Groon Rll<Of 1222505474752 04.01-23 PINK Pink Salmon Grccin Rivet 1222505474752 0:1-11-14 CCi R<l$ldent Cutthroat Groon Rivet 1222505474752 04-12·09 SOCK Sockeye Satmon Green Rivet 1222505474752 03-11-14 STSU Summer SCeelhead Gillen Rivet 122'2505474752 05-0-1-12 STWI Winter S1ee0iead Green Rive< 1222505474752 05-04-14 COHO Cello Salmon Honey Dew Creek 1221803475169 05-06-27 CCT Ri!$ldent Cutthroat Honey Dew Creek 1221803475169 04-12-07 COHO Collo Salmon May Creek 1222101475287 OS-06-27 l'fb'J)'FI,;,P.......,.R,p,,! P'9" 1 ol2 II I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I ' I I 11 ' APPENDIX B Project Photographs I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Photo 1 Photo 2 PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington North Cedar River bridge (arrow) at mouth of Cedar River (note Renton Municipal Airport to the left of the Cedar River and the Cedar River Trail Park and Boeing to the right) Looking north from the right bank of the Cedar River at the North Cedar River bridge AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reportslbe\appendix b\photoappendix.doc B-1 ,r •' [ I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 11 I I • I I I I I I I I I I Photo 3 Photo 4 PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Bridge under construction in 1943 Looking west at underside of North Cedar River bridge AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:lboeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reports\be\appendix blphotoappendix.doc B-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Photo 5 Photo 6 PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Looking at extensive fungal decay in timber cap (note arrow indicating screwdriver embedded in decayed timber cap) Damaged grout pad on top of H-pile (arrow) AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reportslbelappendix b\photoappendix.doc B-3 I I' I I I I I I I I r I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Photo 7 Photo 8 PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington n .. "~ ,· .. , .. -;·"' '¢-:r ' "' .,~, . )' . .. , ,"(, < Crack extending up the cap and across underside of bridge deck (arrows) Damaged electrical conduit attachment (arrow) on bridge AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:lboeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reportslbelappendiK blphotoappendi)(.doc B-4 I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r-;. •.• Photo 9 PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington .. --·~· ..... --•. s ' .. _) ,1 Photo 10 Looking at timber bulkhead along west bank of Cedar River AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reports\be\appendix b\photoappendix.doc B-5 I I I I I I f I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I * I ' I Photo 11 PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Looking at west bank of Cedar River from bridge deck (Renton Municipal Airport in background) Photo 12 Looking at east bank of Cedar River from bridge deck (note timber bulkhead) AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:lboeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitling\reportslbe\appendix blphotoappendix.doc B-6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Photo 13 Cedar River Trail Park located on east bank of Cedar River, south of project site Photo 14 Lake Washington shoreline west of bridge apron (Renton Municipal Airport runway at center left) AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reportslbe\appendix b\photoappendix.doc B-7 I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Photo 15 Photo 16 PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Lake Washington shoreline west of bridge apron ~ .. , .. - -; ,·.q. • . 1 ··~ . ---. ~- . ', ';...,,. ~. ~.:. ... : ·. ·...; . ,; -. '! _,...,. Lake Washington shoreline east of bridge apron AMEC Geomatrix. Inc. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reports\be\appendix b\photoappendix.doc B-8 I I I I I I I I I I f I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I *· I I I I I I I PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington ' ' .... Photo 17 Large woody debris in Lake Washington at mouth of Cedar River (bridge at center left) AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\feports\be\appendix b\photoappendix.doc B-9 r I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Photo 1 ame PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No . NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington North Cedar River bridge (arrow) at mouth of Cedar River (note Renton Municipal Airport to the left of the Cedar River and the Cedar River Trail Park and Boeing to the right) Photo 2 Looking north from the right bank of the Ced ar River at the North Cedar River bridge AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:lboelng renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permttting\repo,ts\be\appendix b\photoappendix.doc B-1 •' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Photo 3 Bridge under construction in 1943 Photo 4 Looking we st at underside of North Cedar River bridge AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boelng renton\14071.001 bridge maintenance permlttlngl/eports\be\appendix b\pllotoappendix.doc B-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Photo 5 Looking at extensive fungal decay in timber cap (note arrow indicating screwdriver embedded in decayed timber cap) Photo 6 Damaged grout pad on top of H-pile (arrow) AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:lboeing renlon\14071-001 bridge maintenance pennitting\reportslbe\appendix b\photoappendix.doc 8-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No . NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Photo 8 Damaged electrical conduit attachment (arrow) on bridge AMEC Geomatri x, Inc. p:\boeing renton\14071-00 1 bridge maintenance pem,ittlngveportslbelappendix b\photo appendlx .doc B-4 l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton , Washington Photo 9 Looking south at Cedar River from bridge deck Photo 10 Looking at timber bulkhead along west bank of Cedar River AMEC Geomatrix, Inc . p:\boelng renton\14071-00 1 bndge maintenance penntttlnglrepons\be\appendix b\photoappendix.doc 8 -5 •' I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Photo 11 Looking at west bank of Cedar River from bridge deck (Renton Municipal Airport in background) Photo 12 Looking at east bank of Cedar River from bridge deck (note timber bulkhead) AMEC Geomatrix, Inc . p:\boeing renton\14071-00 1 bridge maintenance pem,ittingveports\balappendix b\photoappendlx.doc B-6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r I I I I I I ame PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No . NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Photo 13 Cedar River Trai l Park located on east bank of Cedar Rive r, south of proj ect site Pho to 14 Lake Washington shoreline we st of bridge apron (Renton Municipal Airport runway at center left) AMEC Geomatrix, In c. p:lboelng renton\14071-()01 bridge maintenance permlttinglreportslbe\appendix b~hotoappendix.doc B -7 r I f I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Photo 15 Lake Washington shoreline west of bridge apron Photo 16 Lake Washington shoreline east of bridge apron AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:lboelng renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitUng\reports\be\appendix b\photoappendlx.doc B-8 I I I I I I I I I l I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Photo 17 Large woody debris in Lake Washington at mouth of Cedar River (bridge at center left) AMEC Geomatrix , Inc . p;lboeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\feports\belappendbc blphotoappendlx.doc B-9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame SPECIES LIFE HISTORIES Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington CHINOOK SALMON GENERAL LIFE HISTORY (CORPS, 2000) Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) is the largest of the Pacific sa lmon . A lso known as "king" salmon , adult Ch inook salmon migrate from a marine environment into freshwater streams and rivers of their birth where they spawn and die . Among Chinook salmon , two distinct races have evolved . (1) A "stream-type" Chinook is found most commonly in headwater streams. Stream-type Chinook have a longer freshwater residency and perform extensive offshore migrations before returning to their natal streams in the spring or summer months. (2) An "ocean-type" Chinook is commonly found in coastal streams in North Ameri ca. Ocean-type Chinook typically migrate to sea within the first 3 months of emergence, but they may spend up to a year in fresh water prior to emigration . They also spend their ocean life in coastal waters . Ocean-type Chinook salmon return to their natal streams o r rivers as spring , winter, fall, summer, and late-fall runs, but summer and fall runs predominate (Healey , 1991 ). The difference between these life history types is physical , with both genetic and morphological foundations. Adult female Chinook will prepare a spawning bed , called a redd, in a stream area with suitable grave l composition, water depth, and velocity . Depe nding on the Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU), redds may be created in the spring or through the fall months. Redds will vary widely in size and in location within the stream or river. The adult female Chinook may deposit eggs in 4 to 5 "nesting pockets" within a single redd . After laying eggs in a redd , adult Chinook will guard the redd from 4 to 25 days before dying. Chinook salmon eggs will hatch, depending upon water temperatures , between 90 to 150 days after deposition . Streamflow, gravel quality, and silt load all significantly influence the survival of developing Chinook sa lmon eggs. Juvenile Chinook may spend from 3 months to 2 years in fresh water after emergence and before migrating to estuarine areas as smolts, and then into the ocean to feed and mature. Juvenile ocean-type Chinook tend to utilize estuaries and coastal areas more extensively for juvenile rearing . Juvenile Chinook salmon feed primarily on aquatic insect larvae and terrestrial insects, typically in the nearshore areas . AMEC Geomatri x, In c. p:lboeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permittinglreports\be\appendix c\lishhfehistories_ 110909.doc C-1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame PUGET SOUND CHINOOK EVOLUTIONARILY SIGNIFICANT UNIT (CORPS, 2000) The Puget Sound Chinook ESU is listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. The range for the Puget Sound Chinook salmon ESU includes all marine , estua rine and river reaches accessible to listed Chinook salmon in Puget Sound . Puget Sound ma rine areas i nclude South Sound , Hood Canal , and North Sound to the int ernational boundary at the o ute r extent of the Strait of Georgia, Haro Strait, and the Strait of Juan De Fuca to a stra ight line extending north from the west end of Freshwater Bay, inclusive . Excluded are areas above Tait Dam (Washington ), Lansburg Diversion (Washington), Alder Dam (Washington), and Elwha Dam (Washington), or above longstanding, natural impassable barrie rs (i.e., natural waterfalls in existence for at least several hundred years). Adult Ch inoo k salmon m igrate from a marine environment into t he freshwater streams and rivers of their birth where they spawn and die . Among Chinook salmon , two distinct races have evolved. (1) A "stream-type" Chinook is found most commonly in headwater streams . Stream-type Chinook have a longer freshwater residency and perform extensive offshore migrations before returning to their natal streams in the spring or summer month s. (2) A n "o cean-type" Chinook, which is commonly found in coastal streams in North America. Ocean- type Chinook typically migrate to sea within the f irst 3 months of emergence , but they may spend up to a year in fresh water prior to emigration . They also spend the ir oc ean life in coastal waters . Ocean-type Chinook salmon return to their nata l streams or rivers as sprin g, winter, fall, summer, and latefall runs , but summer and fall runs predominate (Healey, 1991 ). The difference between these life history types is physical, with both genetic and morphological foundations. Adult female Chinook will prepare a spawning bed , called a redd, in a stream area w ith suitable gravel composition, water depth and velocity . Redds w i ll vary w idely in size and in location within the stream or river. The adult female Chinook may deposit eggs in 4 to 5 "nesting po ckets " within a single redd . After laying eggs in a redd , adult Chinook will guard the redd from 4 to 25 days before dying. Chinook salmon eggs will hatc h , depending upon water temperatures, between 90 to 150 days after deposition . Streamflow, gravel quality, and silt load all significantly influence the survival of developing Chinook salmon eggs. Juvenile Chinook may spend from 3 months to 2 years in fresh water after emergence and before migrating to estuarine areas as smolts, and then into the ocean to feed and mature . Juven ile ocean-type Chinook tend to utilize estuaries and coastal areas more extensively for juvenile rearing . Juvenile Chinook salmon feed primarily on aquatic insect larvae and terrestrial insects , typically in the nearshore areas. Puget Sound Chinook salmon hatch and rea r in streams and rivers flowing into Puget Sound, and the Dungeness River and its tributaries . AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reports\belappendix clfishlifehist0<ies_ 110909.doc C-2 I I I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIXC Species Life Histories I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame SPECIES LIFE HISTORIES Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington CHINOOK SALMON GENERAL LIFE HISTORY (CORPS, 2000) Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) is the largest of the Pacific salmon . Also known as "king " salmon, adult Chinook salmon m igrate from a marine environment into freshwater streams and rivers of their birth where they spawn and die . Among Chinook salmon , two distinct races have evolved . (1) A "stream-type" Chinook is found most commonly in headwater streams. Stream-type Chinook have a longer freshwater residency and perform extensive offshore migrations before returning to their natal streams in the spring or summer months. (2) An "ocean-type " Chinook is commonly found in coastal streams in North America. Ocean-type Chinook typically migrate to sea within the first 3 months of emergence , but they may spend up to a year in fresh water prior to emigration. They also spend their ocean life in coastal waters . Ocean-type Chinook salmon return to their natal streams or rivers as spring , winter, fall, summer, and late-fall runs, but summer and fall runs predominate (Healey , 1991 ). The difference between these life history types is physical , with both genetic and morphological foundations. Adult female Chinook will prepare a spawning bed, called a redd , in a stream area with suitable gravel composition, water depth, and velocity. Depending on the Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU), redds may be created in the spring or through the fall months. Redds will vary widely in size and in location within the stream or river. The adult female Chinook may deposit eggs in 4 to 5 "nesting pockets" within a single redd. After laying eggs in a redd , adult Chinook will guard the redd from 4 to 25 days before dying . Chinook salmon eggs will hatch, depending upon water temperatures, between 90 to 150 days after deposition . Streamflow, gravel quality, and silt load all significantly infl uence the survival of developing Chinook salmon eggs. Juvenile Chinook may spend from 3 months to 2 years in fresh water after emergence and before migrating to estuarine areas as smelts, and then into the ocean to feed and mature. Juvenile ocean-type Chinook tend to utilize estuaries and coasta l areas more extensively for juvenile rearing. Juvenile Chinook sa lmon feed primarily on aquatic insect larvae and terrestria l insects, typically in the nearshore areas . AMEC Geomatri x, Inc. p:lboeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permittinglreportslbelappendix cllisht~ehistories_ 110909.doc C -1 I I I I I I I I I I I I r I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame PUGET SOUND CHINOOK EVOLUTIONARILY SIGNIFICANT UNIT (CORPS, 2000) The Puget Sound Chinook ESU is listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. The range for the Puget Sound Chinook salmon ESU includes all marine, estuarine and river reaches accessible to listed Chinook salmon in Puget Sound. Puget Sound marine areas include South Sound, Hood Canal , and North Sound to the international boundary at the outer extent of the Strait of Georgia, Haro Stra it. and the Strait of Juan De Fuca to a straight line extending north from the west end of Freshwater Bay, inclusive. Excluded are areas above Tait Dam (Washington), Lansburg Diversion (Washington), Alder Dam (Washington), and Elwha Dam (Washington). or above longstanding, natural impassable barriers (i.e., natural waterfalls in existence for at least several hundred years). Adult Chinook salmon migrate from a marine environment into the freshwater streams and rivers of their birth where they spawn and die. Among Chinook salmon , two distinct races have evolved. (1) A "stream-type" Chinook is found most commonly in headwater streams. Stream-type Chinook have a longer freshwater residency and perform extensive offshore migrations before return ing to their natal streams in the spring or summer months. (2) An "ocean-type" Chinook, which is commonly found in coastal streams in North America. Ocean- type Chinook typically migrate to sea within the first 3 months of emergence, but they may spend up to a year in fresh water prior to emigration. They also spend their ocean life in coastal waters. Ocean-type Chinook salmon return to their natal streams or rivers as spring, winter, fall, summer, and latefall runs, but summer and fall runs predominate (Healey, 1991 ). The difference between these life history types is physical, with both genetic and morphological foundations. Adult female Chinook will prepare a spawning bed, called a redd, in a stream area with suitable gravel composition, water depth and velocity. Redds will vary widely in size and in location within the stream or river. The adult female Chinook may deposit eggs in 4 to 5 "nesting pockets" within a single redd. After laying eggs in a redd, adult Chinook will guard the redd from 4 to 25 days before dying . Chinook salmon eggs will hatch, depending upon water temperatures, between 90 to 150 days after deposition. Streamflow, gravel quality, and silt load all significantly influence the survival of developing Chinook salmon eggs . Juvenile Chinook may spend from 3 months to 2 years in fresh water after emergence and before migrating to estuarine areas as smolts, and then into the ocean to feed and mature . Juvenile ocean-type Chinook tend to utilize estuaries and coastal areas more extensively for juveni le rearing. Juvenile Chinook salmon feed primarily on aquatic insect larvae and terrestrial insects, typically in the nearshore areas. Puget Sound Chinook salmon hatch and rear in streams and rivers flowing into Puget Sound, and the Dungeness River and its tributaries. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boeing renton\14071 -001 bridge maintenance permltting\rePQrtslbe\appendix c\flshl~ehis torles_ 110909 .doc C-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame STEELHEAD TROUT GENERAL LIFE HISTORY (CORPS, 2000) The life history of 0 . mykiss is one of the most complex of any of the salmon id species. The species exhibits both anadromous forms (steelhead) and resident forms (usually referred to as rainbow or redband trout). They reside in the marine environment for 2 to 3 years prior to returning to their natal stream to spawn as 4-or 5-year-old fish . Unlike Pacific salmon , steelhead trout are iteroparous or capable of spawning more than once before they die. However, it is rare for steelhead to spawn more than twice before dying, and those that do are usually females. Biologically, steelhead can be divided into two reproductive ecotypes, based on the ir state of sexual maturity at the time of river entry. These two ecotypes are termed "stream-maturing " and "ocean-maturing." Stream-maturing steelhead enter fresh water in a sexually immature condition and require from several months to a year to mature and spawn. These fish are often referred to as "summer run " steelhead. Ocean-maturing steelhead enter fresh water with well-developed gonads and spawn shortly after r iver entry. These fish are commonly referred to as "winter-run " steelhead. In the Columbia River basin essentially all steelhead that return to streams east of the Cascade Mountains are stream maturing . Ocean-maturing fish are the predominate ecotype in coastal streams and lower Columbia River tributaries. Native steelhead in California generally spawn earlier than those to the north with spawning beginning in December. Washington populations begin spawning in February or March . Native steelhead spawning in Oregon and Idaho is not well documented . In the Clackamas River in Oregon, winter-run steelhead spawning begins in April and continues into June. In the Washougal River, Washington, summer-run steelhead spawn from March into June whereas summer run fish in the Kalama River, Washington , spawn from January through April. Among inland steelhead, Columbia River populations from tributaries upstream of the Yakima River, Washington , spawn later than most downstream populations. Depending on water temperature, fertilized steelhead eggs may incubate in redds for 1.5 to 4 months before hatching as "alevins." Following yolk sac absorption, young juveniles or "fry " emerge from the gravel and begin active feeding. Juveniles rear in fresh water for 1 to 4 years, then migrate to the ocean as smolts . Downstream migration of wild steelhead smolts in the lower Columbia River begins in April , peaks in mid-May, and is essentially complete by the end of June (FPC, 1993, 1995, 1997). Previous studies of the timing and duration of steelhead downstream migration indicate that they typically move quickly through the lower Columbia River estuary with an average daily movement of about 21 kilometers (Dawley et al., 1979 and 1980). AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:lboeing ,.,.,ton\14071-001 bridge maintenance pemlitling\feportslbelappendix clfi shlifehlstories_ 110909.doc C-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PUGET SOUND STEELHEAD LIFE HISTORY (NMFS, 2005) Winter-Run Steelhead In general, winter-run, or ocean-maturing, steelhead return as adults to the tributaries of Puget Sound from December to April (WDF et al., 1973). Spawning occurs from January to mid- June, with peak spawning occurring from mid-April through May. Prior to spawning, maturing adults hold in pools or in side channels to avoid high winter flows. Steelhead tend to spawn in moderate to high-gradient sections of streams. In contrast to semelparous Pacific salmon , steelhead females do not guard their redds, or nests , but return to the ocean following spawning (Burgner et al., 1992). Spawned-out females that return to the sea are referred to as "kelts." Summer-Run Steelhead The life history of summer-run steelhead is highly adapted to specific environmental conditions. Because these conditions are not common in Puget Sound, the relative incidence and size of summer-run steelhead populations is substantially less than that for winter-run steelhead . Summer-run steelhead have also not been widely monitored, in part, because of their small population size and the difficulties in monitoring fish in their headwater holding areas. Sufficient information exists for only 4 of the 16 Puget Sound summer-run steelhead populations identified in the 2002 Salmon Steelhead Inventory (SaSI) to determine the population status (WDFW, 2002). Juvenile Life History The majority of steelhead juveniles reside in fresh water for 2 years prior to emigrating to marine habitats, with limited numbers emigrating as 1-or 3-year-old smelts. Smoltification and seaward migration occur principally from April to mid-May (WDF et al., 1973). Two-year-old naturally produced smelts are usually 140 to 160 millimeters in length (Wydoski and Whitney, 1979; Burgner et al., 1992). The inshore migration pattern of steelhead in Puget Sound is not well understood; it is generally thought that steelhead smelts move quickly offshore (Hartt and Dell, 1986). Ocean Migration Steelhead oceanic migration patterns are poorly understood . Evidence from tagging and genetic studies indicates that P uget Sound steelhead travel to the central North Pacific Ocean (French et al., 1975; Hartt and Dell, 1986; Burgner et al., 1992). Puget Sound steelhead feed in the ocean for 1 to 3 yea rs before returning to their natal stream to spawn . Typically, Puget Sound steelhead spend 2 years in the ocean. although, notably, Deer Creek summer-run steelhead spend only a sing le year in the ocean before spawning . AMEC Geomatri x, In c. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance pennltUnglreportslbelappendix clf!Shlffehlstories_ 110909.doc C-4 I I I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame BULL TROUT GENERAL LIFE HISTORY (CORPS, 2000) Bull trout (Sa/velinus confluentus) are native to western North America, are widespread throughout tributaries of the Columbia River basin, including the headwaters in Montana and Canada . Bull trout are generally nonanadromous and live in a variety of habitats including small streams, large rivers, and lakes or reservoirs . However, Coastal/Puget Sound bull trout are anadromous, migrating and maturing in Puget Sound or the Pacific Ocean. They may spend the first 2 to 4 years in small natal streams and then migrate through the larger rivers, lakes, and reservoirs to Puget Sound and the Pacific Ocean . Bull trout exhibit resident and migratory life history strategies through much of the current range (Rieman and McIntyre, 1993). Resident bull trout complete their entire life cycle in the tributary (or nearby) streams in which they spawn and rear. Migratory bull trout spawn in tributary streams where juveni le fish rear from 1 to 4 years before migrating to either a lake (adfluvial), river (fluvial), or in certain coastal areas, to salt water (anadromous), where maturity is reached in one of the three habitats (Fraley and Shepard , 1989; Goetz, 1989). Resident a nd migratory forms may be found together and it is suspected that bull trout give rise to offspring exhibiting either resident or migratory behavior (Rieman and McIntyre , 1993). In some stocks of bull trout, maturing adults may begin migrating to the spawning grounds in spring or early summer. Female bull trout may deposit up to 5,000 or 10,000 eggs in the redds they build, depending on their size. The embryos incubate during the fall , winter, and spring; and the surviving fry emerge from the redds in April and May. The rate of embryo development is dependent upon temperature . After they emerge, the young bull trout disperse up and downstream to find suitable areas to feed. Feeding areas for Coastal/Puget Sound bull trout include estuaries and nearshore marine waters . Young fish feed primarily on aquatic invertebrates in the streams during their first 2 or 3 years but become more piscivorous as they get larger. The bull trout has been eliminated from some of its native range and seriously reduced in abundance in most of the remaining drainages. Excessive exploitation, habitat degradation , and introductions of exotic species are probably the major causes of the declines . Bull trout have more specific habitat requirements compared to other salmonids (Rieman and McIntyre, 1993). Habitat components that appear to influence bull trout distribution and abundance include water temperature, cover, channel form and stability, valley form, spawning and rearing substrates, and migratory corridors (Oliver, 1979; Pratt, 1984 , 1992; Fraley and Shepard, 1989; Goetz, 1989; Hoelscher and Bjornn, 1989; Sedell and Everest , 1991 ; Rieman AMEC Geomatri x, In c. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance pem,itting\reparts\be\appendix cVishlffehistories_ 110909.doc C-5 I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame and McIntyre, 1993, 1995; Rich, 1996; Watson and Hillman, 1997). Bull trout typically spawn from August to November during periods of decreasing water temperatures. However, migratory bull trout frequently begin spawning migrations as early as April. Bull trout require spawning substrate consisting of loose , clean gravel relatively free of fine sediments (Fraley and Shepard, 1989). Depending upon water temperature , incubation is normally 100 to 145 days (Pratt, 1992), and after hatching, juveniles remain in the substrate. Time from egg deposition to emergence may surpass 200 days. Fry normally emerge from early April through May depending upon water temperatures and increasing streamflows (Pratt, 1992; Ratliff and Howell , 1992). Bull trout are opportunistic feeders with food habits primarily a function of size and life history strategy. Resident and juvenile migratory bull trout prey on terrestrial and aquatic insects, macro zooplankton and small fish (Boag, 1987; Goetz, 1989; Donald and Alger, 1993). Adult migratory bull trout are primarily piscivorous , known to feed on various fish species (Fraley and Shepard , 1989; Donald and Alger, 1993). COASTAUPUGET SOUND BULL TROUT DISTINCT POPULATION SEGMENT (CORPS, 2000) The Coastal/Puget Sound Bull Trout Distinct Population Segment (DPS) is listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. The Coastal/Puget Sound bull trout population segment encompasses all Pacific Coast drainages within Washington , including Puget Sound. This population segment is discrete because the Pacific Ocean and the crest of the Cascade Mountain Range geographically segregate it from subpopulations. The population segment is significant to the species as a whole because it is thought to contain the only anadromous forms of bull trout in the conterminous U.S., thus , occurring in a unique ecological setting. No bull trout exist in coastal drainages south of the Columbia River. A 1998 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) study found 80 bull trouUDolly Varden populations in Washington : 14 (18%) were healthy, 2 (3%) were in poor condition , 6 (8%) were critical, and the status of 58 (72%) of the stocks were unknown . Bull trout are estimated to have occupied about 60 percent of the Columbia River basin, and presently occur in 45 percent of the estimated historical range (Quigley and Arbelbide, 1997). Land and water management activities that degrade bull trout habitat and continue to threaten all of the bull trout population segments include dams, forest management practices, livestock grazing, agriculture, and roads and mining (Beschta et al., 1987; Chamberlain et al., 1991 ; Furniss et al., 1991; Meehan, 1991 ; Nehlsen et al., 1991; Sedell and Everest, 1991; Craig and Wissmar, 1993; MBTSG, 1998). Fish barriers , timber harvesting , agricultural practices, and urban development are thought to be major factors affecting "native char" in the Coastal/Puget Sound DPS (64 Federal Register [FR] 58909-58933). AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permllling\teportslbelappendix cllishlffehlstorles_ 110909.doc C-6 I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame REFERENCES Beschta, R.L., Bilby, R.E ., Brown , G.W., Holtby, L .B ., and Hofstra, T .D ., 1987, Stream temperature and aquatic habitat -fisheries and forest interaction, in Salo , E .O ., and Cundy, T.W. (eds.), Streamside Management-Forestry and Fishery Interactions: University of Washington, Institute of Forest Resources Contribution 57, Seattle, 41 p . Boag, T.D., 1987, Food habits of bull char, Sa/ve/inus conf/uentus , and rainbow trout, Sa/mo gairdneri, coexisting in a foothills stream in Northern Alberta: Canadian Field- Naturalist, v . 101, p. 56-62. Burgner, R.L., Light, J .T., Margolis, L., Okazaki , T ., Tautz, A., and Ito , S ., 1992, Distribution and Origins of Steelhead Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Offshore Waters of the North Pacific : International North Pacific Fisheries Commission, Bulletin Number 51. Chamberlain, T.W., Harr, R.D., and Everest, F .H ., 1991 , Timber harvesting, silviculture, and watershed processes, in Meehan, W.R. (ed.), Influences of Forest and Rangeland Management on Salmonid Fishes and Their Habitats: American Fisheries Society Special Publication 19, 24 p. Corps (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers), 2000, Appendix B -Species Life Histories: Corps, Seattle, Washington , http://www .nws.usace.army.mil/publicmenu/DOCUMENTS/REG/ appendix_b_-_general_fish_life_histories.pdf (accessed May 15, 2005). Craig, S .D., and Wissmar, R.C., 1993, Habitat Conditions Influencing a Remnant Bull Trout Spawning Population, Gold Creek, Washington , Draft Report: University of Washington, Fisheries Research Institute, Seattle . Dawley, E.M ., Sims, C .W., Ledgerwood, R.D ., Miller, D.R., and Thrower, F .P., 1979, A Study to Define the Migrational Characteristics of Chinook and Coho Salmon and Steelhead Trout in the Columbia River Estuary: 1978 Annual Report to Pacific Northwest Regional Commission, 90 p. (available Northwest Fisheries Science Center, 2725 Montlake Blvd . E ., Seattle, Washington 98112-2097). Dawley, E.M., Sims, C .W ., Ledgerwood, R.D., Miller, D .R., and Williams, J .G., 1980, A Study to Define the Migrational Characteristics of Chinook and Coho Salmon and Steelhead Trout in the Columbia River Estuary : 1979 Annual Report to Pacific Northwest Regional Commission, 53 p. (available Northwest Fisheries Science Center, 2725 Montlake Blvd . E., Seattle, Washington 98112-2097). Donald, D.B., and Alger, J ., 1993, Geographic distribution, species displacement, and niche overlap for lake trout and bull trout in mountain lakes: Canadian Journal of Zoology, V. 71, p. 238-247 . FPC (Fish Passage Center), 1993, 1992 Annual Report: Fish Passage Center of the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority. FPC, 1995, 1994 Annual Report: Fish Passage Center of the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc . p:lboeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permittinglreports\be\appendix c\fishlffehisto,ies_ 110909.doc C-7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame FPC, 1997, 1996 Annual Report: Fish Passage Center of the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority . FR (Federal Register), 1999, Part II, Department of the Interior-U .S . Fish and Wildlife Service (50 CFR Part 17), Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants ; Determination of Threatened Status for Bull Trout in the Coterminous United States; Final Rule Notice of Intent To Prepare a Proposed Special Rule Pursuant to Section 4(d) of the Endangered Species Act for the Bull Trout; Proposed Rule, v . 64 , no . 210, Novembe r 1, 1999. F raley, J .J ., and Shepard , B.B ., 1989, Life history, ecology and population status of migratory bull trout (Salvelinus conf/uentus) in the Flathead Lake river system, Montana : Northwest Science , v . 63, p. 133 -143. French, R.F ., Bakkala , R.G ., and Sutherland , D.F ., 1975, Ocean Distribution of Stock of Pacifi c Salmon, Oncorhynchus spp ., and Steelhead T rout, Salmon gairdneri, as Shown by Tagging Experiments: NOAA Technical Report, NMFS SSRF-689. Furniss, M.J ., Roelofs, T.D ., and Yee , C .S., 1991 , Road construction and maintenance, in Meehan, W .R. (ed .), Influences of Forest and Rangeland Management on Salmonid Fishes and Their Habitats: American Fisheries Society Special Publication 19, 26 p. Goetz, F ., 1989, Biology of the Bull Trout, Salvelinus confluentus , a Literature Review: U .S . Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Willamette National Forest, Eugene , Oregon . Hartt, A.C ., and Dell , M .B ., 1986, Early Oceanic Migrations and Growth of Juvenile Pacific Sa lmon and Steelhead Trout: International North Pacific Fisheries Commission , Bulletin Number 46 . Healey, M.C ., 1991, Life history of Chinook salmon (On corhynchus tshawytscha), in Groot, C ., and Margolis, L . (eds .), Pacific Salmon Life Histories: University of British Columbia Pre s s , Vancouver, 82 p. Hoelsc her, B ., and Bjornn , T .C ., 1989, Habitat, Density, and Potential Producti on of Trout and Char in Pend Oreille Lake Tributaries: Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Project F-71-R-10 , Subproject 111 , Job No. 8, Boise . MBTSG (Montana Bull Trout Scientific Group), 1998, The Relationship Between Land Management Activities and Habitat Requirements of Bull Trout: The Montana Bull Trout Restoration Team, Montana Fish , Wildlife and Parks, Helena. Meehan, W.R., 1991 , Introduction and overview, in Meehan , W .R. (ed .), Influences of Forest and Rangeland Management on Salmonid Fishes and Their Habitats : American Fisheries Society Special Publication 19, 15 p . NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service), 2005, Status Review Update for Puget Sound Steelhead : 2005 Puget Sound Steelhead Biological Review Team, NMFS, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle , Washington , http://www.nwr.noaa .gov/Publications/ Biological-Status-Reviews/upload/SR2005-steelhead.pdf (accessed May 10, 2007). AMEC Geomatrix , Inc. p:lboeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permHtlng\teports\l>elappendix c\fishlifehist ories_ 110909.doc C-8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame Nehlsen, W., W illiams, J .E ., and Lichatowich , J .A.. 1991, Pacific salmon at the crossroads - stocks at risk from California , Oregon , Idaho, and Washington : Fisheries, v . 16, p. 4 21 . Oliver, G ., 1979, A Final Report on the Present Fisheries Use of the Wigwam River with an Emphasis on the Migratory Life History and Spawning Behavior of Dolly Varden Char, Salvelinus ma/ma (Walbaum): Fisheries Investigations in Tributaries of the Canadian Portion of Libby Reservoir, British Columbia Fish and Wildlife Branch, Victoria . Pratt, K.P ., 1984, Habitat use and species interactions of juvenile cutthroat (Salmo clarkii lewis,) and bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in the upper Flathead River Basin: M.S. Thesis, University of Idaho , Moscow. Pratt, K.P ., 1992 , A review of bull trout life history, in Howell, P.J ., and Buchanan , D.V. (eds .), Proceedings of the Gearhart Mountain Bull Trout Workshop: Oregon Chapter of the American Fisheries Society, Corvallis , 4 p . Quigley, T .M., and Arbelbide , S .J ., 1997, An assessment of ecosystem components in the interior Columbia Basin and portion of the Klamath and Great basins, volume Ill, in Quigley, T.M . (ed .). The Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project: Scientific Assessment, USDA Forest Service, PNW-GTR-405 , Portland , Oregon , 656 p . Ratliff, D.E ., and Howell, P.J ., 1992, The status of bull trout populations in Oregon , in Howell, P .J., and Buchanan , D.V . (eds .), Proceedings of the Gearhart Mountain Bull Trout Workshop: Oregon Chapter of the American Fisheries Society , Corvallis, 7 p . Rich, C.F ., 1996. Influence of abiotic and biotic factors on occurrence of resident bull trout in fragmented habitats, western Montana : M.S . Thesis , Montana State University, Bozeman. Rieman, B .E ., and McIntyre, J.D., 1993, Demographic and Habitat Requirements for Conservation of Bull Trout: U .S. Department of Agriculture , U .S . Forest Service, lntermountain Research Station , General Technical Report INT-308 , Ogden, Utah . Rieman, B .E., and McIntyre, J .D., 1995, Occurrence of bull trout in naturally fragmented habitat patches of varied size: Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, v . 124, p. 285-296. Sedell , J.R., and Everest, F.H., 1991, Historic Changes in Pool Habitat for Columbia River Basin Salmon Under Study for TES Listing, Draft USDA Report: Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, Oregon . Watson, G .• and Hillman , T.W., 1997, Factors affecting the distribution and abundance of bull trout -an investigation at hierarchical scales: North American Journal of Fisheries Management, v. 17, p . 237-252 . WDF (Washington State Department of Fisheries), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Washington State Department of Game, 1973, Joint Statement Regarding the Biology, Status , Management, and Harvest of Salmon and Steelhead Resources. of the Puget AMEC Geomatrix, Inc . p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance per mlttlng\reports\be\appendlx c\tlshtifehistorles_ 110909.doc C-9 I I I I I I I I I I I I r I , I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ame Sound and Olympic Peninsular Drainage Areas of Western Washington : WDF , Olympia. WDFW (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife), 2002, Salmonid Stock Inventory: WDFW, Olympia , http://www.wdfw.wa .gov/fish/sasi/ (accessed May 10, 2007). Wydoski , R.S ., and Whitney, R.R., 1979, Inland Fishes of Washington: University of Washington Press , Seattle. AMEC Geomatri x, Inc . p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permittinglreportslbe\appendix clflshlWehis tories_ 110909_doc C-10 I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT ASSESSMENT Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS-2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton , Washington ACTION AGENCY U.S . Army Corps of Engineers , Seattle District LOCATION Cedar River, Renton , King County, Washington , Township 23N , Range 5E , Section 7 PROJECT NAME Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT BACKGROUND The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA), as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-267), requires federal agencies to consult with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA-Fisheries) on activities that may adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat (EFH). EFH is defined as "those waters and substrate necessary to fish for spawning , breeding, feeding , or growth to maturity ." "Waters" include "aquatic areas and their associated physical , chemical , and biological properties that are used by fish ." They may include aquatic areas historically used by fish. "Substrate" includes "sediment, hard bottom , stru ctures underlying the waters, and associated biological communities" (NMFS, 1999). The MSA requires consultation for all actions that may adversely affect EFH , and does not distinguish between actions within and outside of EFH . Any reasonable attempt to encourage the conservation of EFH must take into account actions that occur outside of EFH, such as upstream and upslope activities that may have an adverse effect on EFH . Therefore, EFH consultation with NOAA-Fisheries is required by federal agencies undertaking , permitting, or funding activities that may adversely affect EFH , regardless of its location . This assessment evaluates the impacts of the proposed project to determine whether it "may adversely affect" designated EFH for federally managed fisheries species in the proposed action area . The assessment also describes conservation measures to avoid , minimize , or otherwise offset potential adverse effects of the proposed action on designated EFH . AMEC Geomatrix, In c. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge main tenance pe<miUingl/eports\b e\appendix d\brldgemaintefh_ 110909.doc D-1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I IDENTIFICATION OF EFH The Pacific Fishery Management Council (PFMC) has designated EFH for federally managed fisheries within the waters of Washington, Oregon, and Californ ia . The designated EFH for groundfish (PFMC, 1998a ; Casillas et al., 1998) and coastal pelagic species (PFMC, 1998b) encompasses all waters from the mean high water line and upriver extent of salt water to the boundary of the United States exclusive economic zones (370.4 km [kilometers]) (PFMC , 1998a, 1998b). Freshwater EFH for Pacifi c salmon includes all those streams, lakes, ponds, wetlands, and other water bodies currently or historically accessible to salmon in Washington , Oregon , California, and Idaho, except areas upstream of certain impassable manmade barriers (as identified by the PFMC), and longstanding, naturally impassable barriers (e.g ., natural waterfalls in existence for several hundred years) (PFMC, 1999). In estuarine and marine areas, designated salmon EFH extends from the nearshore and tidal submerged environments within state territorial waters to the full extent of the exclusive economic zone (370.4 km) offshore of Washington , Oregon, and California north of Point Conception, to the Canadian Border (PFMC, 1999). Groundfish , coastal pelagic, and salmonid fish species that have designated EFH in Puget Sound are listed in Table 1. Some of these species may occur in the action area . Refer to the relevant EFH designations (Casillas et al., 1998; PFMC, 1998a, 1998b, 1999) for life-history stages of these species that may occur in the project vicinity. Assessment of the impacts to these species' EFH from the proposed project is based on this information. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT The major activities of the proposed action include: • Replacement of a timber cap beam (14-inch X 11-inch)-The existing timber cap beam is rotting as a result of water seeping onto the top of the cap through the bridge expansion joint. The accumulated water has resulted in fungal decay of the timber cap beam . The existing beam will need to be removed and replaced with a new beam. • Replace grout pads between H-piles and cap -Grout in a number of grout pads between the H-piles and cap has corroded and needs replacement. The old grout pads will need to be removed and replaced. • Replace conduit clips -Existing clips supporting electrical conduits have corroded and require replacement. Old clips will be removed and replaced with new conduit clips . For a more detailed project description, please refer to Section 2.0 of the biological evaluation (BE). A MEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:lboeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance perm~ting\t81)()(1S\be\appendix d\bridgemalntefh_ 110909.doc D-2 I I I I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS OF PROPOSED PROJECT The EFH designation for the Pacific salmon fishery includes all those streams, lakes, ponds, wetlands, and other water bodies currently or historically accessible to salmon in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and California , except above the impassible barriers identified by the PFMC (1999). In estuarine and marine areas, proposed designated EFH for salmon extends from nearshore and tidal submerged environments within state territorial waters out to the full extent of the exclusive economic zone offshore of Washington, Oregon , and California north of Point Conception (PFMC, 1999). The Pacific salmon management unit includes Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), coho (0. kisutch), and pink salmon (0. gorbuscha). Only Chinook and coho salmon use the Lake Washington basin for adult migration, juvenile outmigration, and rearing where suitable habitat is present. The EFH designation for groundfishes and coastal pelagics is defined as those waters and substrate necessary to ensure the production needed to support a long-term sustainable fishery. The marine extent of groundfish and coastal pelagic EFH includes those waters from the nearshore and tidal submerged environment within Washington, Oregon, and California state territorial waters out to the exclusive economic zone (370.4 km [231 .5 miles]) offshore between Canada and the Mexican border. Lake Washington does not support groundfishes or coastal pelagics; therefore, the proposed action will not affect EFH for these groups of fish . EFH for Pacific salmon is present in the action area . The project may result in a minor, temporary effect on water quality (increased turbidity). No permanent adverse effects on EFH for Pacific salmonids, or their prey species , will result from the proposed action . Therefore , the project will not adversely affect EFH for Pacific salmonids. The proposed action is expected to have a net beneficial effect on the nearshore habitat of south Lake Washington that is used by Pacific salmon species. CONSERVATION MEASURES Implementing the conservation measures specified in Section 2.4 of the BE will help to avoid and minimize any potential effects of the proposed project on EFH . CONCLUSION The project may result in a minor, temporary increase in ambient noise, as described in Section 6 .1 .1.3 of the BE . No permanent adverse effects on EFH for Pacific salmonids, or their prey species, will result from the proposed action . Furthermore, the conservation measures described in Section 2.4 of the BE will help in avoiding and minimizing such effects. AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. p:\boelng renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permitting\reportslbe\appendlx dlbridgemalntefh_ 110909.doc D-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ame REFERENCES Casillas , E ., Crockett, L ., deReynier, Y., Glock, J ., Helvey, M ., Meyer, B., Schmitt, C ., Yoklavich, M., Bailey, A., Chao, B., Johnson, B., and Pepperell, T., 1998, Essential Fish Habitat West Coast Groundfish Appe ndix: National Marine Fisheri es Service , Seattle, Washington . NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service), 1999, Essential Fish Habitat Consultation Gu idance: NMFS, Office of Habitat Conservation , Silver Spring, Maryland. NMFS, 2001, Endangered Species Act-Section 7 and Essential Fish Habitat Consultation Biological Opin ion -Port of Olympia Cascade Pole Sediment Remediation (WSB-00- 453): NMFS, Northwest Region , Washington State Habitat Branch , Lacey, Washington. PFMC (Pacific Fishery Management Council), 1998a, The Coastal Pelagic Species F ishery Management Plan -Amendment 8 (December 1998): PFMC , Portland , Oregon. PFMC, 1998b, Final Environmental Assessment/ Regulatory Review for Amendment 1 1 to the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan (October 1998): PFMC , Portland, Oregon. PFMC, 1999, Amendment 14 to the Pacific Coast Salmon Plan -Append ix A, Description and Identification of Essential F ish Habitat, Adverse Impacts and Recommended Conservation Measures for Salmon (August 1999): PFMC, Portland , O regon. A MEC Geomatrix , In c. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge maintenance permltUngl/epo<ts\be\appendlx <1\bridgemaintefh_ 110909.doc 0-4 I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE 1 SPECIES OF FISH ame WITH DESIGNATED ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT IN THE ACTION AREA1 Renton Plant North Cedar River Bridge Maintenance Corps Ref. No. NWS -2009-1300 (Boeing Company) Renton, Washington Common Name I Scientific Name Salmonid Species Chinook salmon I Oncorhvnchus tshawytscha Coho salmon I 0. kisutch Note(s) 1. Source: NMFS, 2001 . NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service), 2001 , Endangered Species Act-Section 7 and Essential Fish Habitat Consultation Biological Opinion -Port of Olympia Cascade Pole Sediment Remediation (WSB-00-453): NMFS, Northwest Region, Washington State Habitat Branch , Lacey, Washington. p:\boeing renton\14071-001 bridge mainten ance pe,mtttinglreportslbe\appendix dlbridgemalntefh_110909.doc AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. Page 1 of 1 ' CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: April 13, 2010 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: 3107 Accessory Structure LUA (file) Number: LUA-09-155, SME Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Rocale Timmons Acceptance Date: December 14, 2009 Applicant: O.Lowell Anderson & Laurie L. Baker Owner: Same as applicant Contact: Same as applicant PID Number: 3342103880 ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: December 14, 2009 Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: Applicant proposes to construct a single-family accessory structure on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. Location: 3107 Mountain View Avenue N Comments: • . DEPARTMENT OF COM.I\.. ,\IITY , AND ECONOMIC. DEVELOPl\flENT . CIE RT! IFl'CATIE OIF IEXE M PT! 01\11 f lRO M SHOR IEII.J N iE SU IBSTANT!Al D IEVl:ll._OPM ENT PIE ~MIT LAND USE ACTION FILE NO.: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT MANAGER: OWNER/APPLICANT: PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: · PROJECT LOCATION: · LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEC-TWN-R: WATER BODY/WETLAND: December 14, 2009 LUA09-155, SME . 3107 Acessory Structure • • r . . Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner · 0. Lowell Anderson and Laurie L. Baker 8225S-128'h Street Seattle, WA 98178 .-The applicant proposes the consvuction of a single-family accessory structu_re on the shore of Lake Washingtori, a . : Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The accessory structure would u·sed for the st~rage of.water related items . and garden tools. The roof is proposed to be planted and usea as an outd~or space with an arbor and swing, The· · prop~sed structure ~otild be 314 square feet ir size ·with a buiiding height of 14 feet to the top of the arbor and would · be set back 25 feet fro~ the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). The 12,102 square foot site is located within the Residential-8 (R-8) du/ac zoning designation. All work . would take place landward of the Ordinary·High Water Mark (OHWM) .. 3107 Mountain View Avenue N · See "Attachment A" SEC 31: TWN 24 -R 5 Lake Washington An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby granted on the proposed p_roject in accordance with RMC 4-9-19.0C'and/or for the following reason(s): • Construction on shorelands by an owner, lessee or contract purchaser of a single-family residence for his/her own use or for the use of his/her family, which· residence does not e~ceed a height of.thirty-five (35) feet above average grade level and which meets all req.uiremerits of the State agency or local government _having jurisdiction thereof, other· than requirements imposed pursuant to this chapter._ · . 1. "Single family" residence means a detached dwelling designed for and occupied by one family including those structures_·and developments within a contiguous ownership which are a normal appurtenance. An "appurtenance'' ·is ·necessarily con_nected to the use and enjoyment of a single-family residence and is located landwar"d of the ordinary high water mark and th~ perimeter of a wetl~nd: On a statewide basis, normal appurtenances include a garage; deck; driveway; utilitie's; fences; installation_ of a septic tank a_nd drainfield and grading wh_ich · _does not exceed two hundred fifty cubic yards and which does not involve · placement of fill in any wetland or waterward of the ordinary highwater mark. · . . . , - ·2. Construction authorized under this exemption shall be located landward of the ordinary high water-mark.· · The propos·ed development is consistent or inconsistent with (check one): CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT xx N/A ' ' xx .J, ' . C. E. "Chip" Vincent, Plannirig Director Planning Division Attachments: Legal Description Vicinity/Neighborhood Detail Map Site Plan ~c: o'. Lowell Anderson' and Laurie L. Baker City of Renton Official File .. Policies of the Shoreline· M_anagement Act. . The guidelines of the Department of Ecology where no Master Program has been finally approved or adapted by the Department. The City of Renton Shoreline Master Program. Date • Legal Description of Property Property Location: 3107 Mountain View Avenue North Renton, Washington, 98056 425-227-4317 Property Owners: 0. Lowell Anderson Laurie L. Baker 8225 S 128th St Parcel Number: Legal Description: Seattle, Washington, 98178 206-772-6284 3342103880 Situated in the SE Quarter of Section 31, T24N, R5E, Willamette Meridian/Baseline: City of Renton Planning Division Nov 3 o 2009 Lots 55, 54, and a portion of Lot 53; Block "A"; C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle No. I, according to plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 63, King County, Washington; together with second class shore lands adjoining and described as follows: All of Lots 55 and 54 together with that portion of Lot 53 described as follows-beginning at the southeast comer of said Lot 53 according to the Record of Survey recorded in Volume 82 of Surveys, Page 232, under King County Recording Number 9109179005, said southeast comer being a point on a curve having a radius of 1196.48 feet, the center of which bears S81 °42'34"E; thence northerly along said curve to the right through a central angle of 0°07'59" an arc distance of2.78 feet; thence N89°50'05"W a distance of 132.83 feet; thence N89°18'24"W a distance of 12.55 feet; thence S89°19'5 l "W a distance of 18.24 feet; thence N88°23'37"W a distance of 29.04 feet; thence S89°49'16"W, parallel with the south line of said Lot 53, a distance of 199.55 feet, more or less, to a point on the Inner Harbor Line; thence S23°38'10"W, along said Inner Harbor Line, a distance of 4.90 feet to the southwest center of said Lot 53; thence N89°49'16"E, along said south line of said Lot 53, a distance of393.76 feet, more or less, to said southwest comer of said Lot 53 and the point of beginning-per King County Superior Court Case Number 00-2-32561-4 SEA under King County Recording Number 20020206000781. 3107MV ANPropertyDescription.doc ZONING PW TECHNICAL SERVICES 07/15/08 B3 -30 T23N R5E E 1/2 - D3 -06 T23N RSE E 1/2 ~o vi 200 400 ( I jFeet 1:4,800 .... N N2Btt, f>l I i j R.a: i i I ! I i N 11 / ! .R-8 ii I, I! t C3 31 T24N RSE E 1/2 S431 NING MAP BO --1 'I VV, :fs·':_ :,1· -,- ;5,, . ,- 26 T24N R4E 22N R4E RESIDENTIAL ~ (RC) Resource Conservation IE] (R-1) Residential 1 du/ac !B (R-4) Residential 4 du/ac ~ (R-8) Residential 8 du/ac 8 (RMH) Residential Manufactured Homes ~ (R-10) Residential 10 du/ac I R-i 4 I (R-14) Residential 14 du/ac I RM-rj (RM·F) Residential Multi-Family j RM-T I (RM· T) Residential MuJtl-Family Traditional IRM-u I (RM-U) Residential Murt!-Famlly Urban Center MIXED USE CENTERS @] (CV) Center Village juc-t-11! (UC-N1) Urban Center -North 1 ~ (UC-N2) Urban Center -North 2 @] (CD) Center Downtown COMMERCIAL ~ (COR) ComrnerciaUOfflce/Resldential 0 (CA) Commercial Arterial ~ (CO) Commercial Office ~ (CN) Commercial Neighborhood 36 lJ CllVO!Jl 1T2 INDUSTRIAL ~ (IL) Industrial -Light 0 (IM) Industrial· Medium ~ (IH} Industrial. Heavy -----R,mton City Umih -·-·-·-Adjacent City Llmlb KROLL PAGE PAGE# INDEX NOl.l:JmUSNOJ ijQc! .I.ON I i1!j I 1,1111 ~ 1:11 :rr ~ , 9SD86' ·4soM ·uo1ue1t nl 1 , q I' I ~c T""" 1:,1 ~~ " ' ~ . N'&AV 01unow lOIC rt i" -If 1 1/r U 11! n ' T""" ;1·1 UJqo:::, Je)fOS UOSJepuv 00 fi'll11/ 1111! I\·~~ ! ~ ~<( ' 111, 0 C: © 0 5 I!!!!) E :~ ! Q) .::: :a,, a: 0 ~ ™ -g, ~ ;·~ ~ ~ :5 t I!!!!) "' 0 a: @& ~~ ' I • Otfl-170 November 30, 2009 City of Renton Planning Division 1055 S. Grady Way WA oq,..,ss Nov 3 o 2009 Renton, WA 98057 ~~©~urti Shoreline Exemption Request-3107 Water Related Accessory Structure '/!ff Ii)) Subject: The attached material is in support of our request for a Shoreline Exemption for a W'!_ter Related Accessory Structure we propose to construct on our property at 3107 Mt. View Ave. N, Rentcrn~~ashington 98056. From our meetings and correspondence with a Renton Planning Department staff member, it'i.~.ur understanding that the attachments listed below should be sufficient for our request to be processed by you;; I. Land Use Master Application Form: Signed and notarized original with legal d~~Jiption attached plus four copies each. ":::-::i;;::::::?::Z;:::;:::..-:::::.-" .,, ...... 2. Project Narrative: Five copies of single page narrative addressing each sub~~2:_ement item. -~·-.. --, --· ........ ,~ ... """"""· -- 3. Neighborhood Detail Maps: Five copies each of I) A".;:·;;r;fwiil"Jffuap, locating the p;~j~ci'.P.roperty relative to jurisdictional boundaries and 2) A detail map, scaled 1"5200\ showirig\tlie project property relati~-to adjacent and neighboring properties. These maps were generad!~~the King Coun~AP system. ·-::-:· 4. Waiver Form: We have been advised that thisWili'be provided.byiRenton Planning Department indicating that the Habitat Data Report and the Standard Stream or r:-iikf~~.'.1.::..:'.:~i,e';,,aived. 5. Site Plan: Five copies of an 1 l ".by'.'i;7!~.~Ifplim.drawirig1~'8Iie ! "~20', folded to 8.5'' by 11 ". ,_,,_____ _ ..... _.,,,__ ·--.. 6. Wetland Assessment: Five,i,;;,;i;:·~fa "Sens7;:';~te.~.Ma;;;·:t§'.:!~e King County iMAP system that shows there are no wetlands on the pr\'iP.~fty and that it is situaie,gi.\i.! .. a "Low":@fp_act area. ··--· .,,,,........ --=~-:;;::. = ·- ;~e~~~~:n~::;:i.~7~~:ve ~~'~!i: the FEMA Flood 'Jjance Rate Map that shows no flood hazards are 8. Habitat Data'Repoit:,,We und",;;~.t~f!.s!.Jhis requirem~.ri!~ill be waived. 9. Standa'~~~am or :ake Study:""'w~il~~iliiia";i;i··:equirement will be waived. The various maps from the King Cou~~MAP system, togethe{;;:+:h obse;;~io~, clearly show no streams extant on or near the property. We hope to;hear from you as soon as·p·ossible so we can submit our building permit application. Please contact us at fue address b~~:~\;~~u need ad:i::~;.rJnformation. Respectfully submitted;·-·"'"'······--············· tl-~~ ~u~~ 0. Lowell Anderson and Laurie L. Baker 8225 S 128fu St. Seattle, WA 98178 206-772-6284 Home 206-910-9222 Cell lowella@mvseac.com, laurieb@mvseac.com OO·SERCoverLetter.doc ' ~-' . ., City of Renton City of Renton ' lAND USE PERMIT Planning Division ·, NOV 3 ii ; JLJ - MASTER APPl!CAT!ON ,· ·-~ _,_. .,.,. ' , 'la.•,· ' t~ ;,si• ., ·• /R"'I I~ II -•-II"" 1:::::1 11 11 I PROPERTY OWNER($) I PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Shoreline NAME: 0 Lowell Anderson and Laurie L. Baker Exemptlon-3107 Wiiter Related Accessory Structure PROJECTIADDRESS_(S)ILOCATION AND ZIP CODE: ADDRESS: 8225 S 128th ... '" ,-.•. 3107;,Mountain.View Av_e_:.N CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98178 Renton."wA!lll056 · ·,c:·. .. .. ·-" . . . ·--··-. KING .. C::OUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER($): TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206 772 6284 . .. ' .. . .. . -" .... . .. --. 3342103880 -··-.. APPLICANT (If other than owner) : .. , :,: -- I·-'. • EXISTING LAND USE{S): NAME: -. ·, .. .:Single Family Residence -··· .... - .. PROPOSED LAND USE{S): COMPANY (if applicable): . ·-· . .... Singl~ Family Residence ... . .. , ... - . EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: .. Residential Single Family -·:.·:.:· .. .. . .... PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION ,, -....... .. .. CITY: .. -.. .... ZIP::.,., .. (If applicable) . . ... . -.. H••·•-••• "" ··-·:' NIA , ... . .. EXISTING ZONING: .. . -.. TELEPHONE NUMBER: RB "' .. ...... . . ... CO'NT,ACT PERSON .. PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): NIA :,-. ·.· -. ·-· SITE AREA (in square feet): NAME: Lowell Arideison·or _Laurie Ba~!'' 12,102 Sq. Feet. ... • -,< ... -·-·· ··-~ ... SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COM PAN". (if applicablo): DEDICATED: NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: ADDRESS: 8225 S 128"' NIA PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98178 Acr-:-~ . ' .0...-4.. ,0 ...... ...c-_._, i NIA. ' TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: NUt BER OF PROP1!>31i!Dr~S (if applicable NIA no~w to 91Dll 206 772 6284 " aooe qHatlAll laurieb@mvseac.com. lowel1a@mvseac.com NU! BEA:·~ ...... v -·" Ul'fl ..:::,· \jf\fppl • . /lble): N/• J -.: .:J,'."y .• - 091119_mas1cr.ipp_RHV02.doc • 1 • 06100 -~----~--·-·-···· ... ...,.,.,..._ -·---~·~·---... --- PFftJECT INFORMATION (contln.d) r---'-----~--------------, PROJECT VALUE: $40,000 NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): One SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 1,160 Sq. Feet 0 AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL 0 AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS QI applicable): 314 Sq. Feet SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL 0 FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (If applicable): N/A 0 GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 0 HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW 0 SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES sq. ft. PROJECT (If applicable): N/A 0 WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal descrlotlon on separate sheet with the follow Ina Information included) SITUATE IN THE _SE __ QUARTER OF SECTION _31_, TOWNSHIP _24_, RANGE _5_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Shoreline Exemption 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) _O Lowell Anderson and Laurie L Baker • dedare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that l am (please check one) _x_ the current owner of the property involved in this application or_ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the Information l'lerewith are In all respects true and correct to the best of my know1edge and belief. (Signature of Owner/Representative) L. 091 I 19_mastcrapp_REV02.doc I certify ll1at I know or have saUsfactory evidence lhal t&J~// ~-~ signed ll1is Instrument and acknowledge It 10 be hlslller~helr free and voluntary t act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the Instrument. ?~ . Nola I My .appointment expires: -l . 06109 Legal Description of Property Property Location: 3107 Mountain View Avenue North Renton, Washington, 98056 425-227-4317 Property Owners: 0. Lowell Anderson Laurie L. Baker 8225 S 128th St Parcel Number: Legal Description: Seattle, Washington, 98178 206-772-6284 3342103880 City of Renton Planning Division NOV 3 0 t!U9 Situated in the SE Quarter of Section 31, T24N, R5E, Willamette Meridian/Baseline: Lots 55, 54, and a portion of Lot 53; Block "A"; C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle No.1, according to plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 63, King County, Washington; together with second class shore lands adjoining and described as follows: All of Lots 55 and 54 together with that portion of Lot 53 described as follows-beginning at the southeast comer of said Lot 53 according to the Record of Survey recorded in Volume 82 of Surveys, Page 232, under King County Recording Number 9109179005, said southeast comer being a point on a curve having a radius of 1196.48 feet, the center of which bears S81 °42'34"E; thence northerly along said curve to the right through a central angle of 0°07'59" an arc distance of2.78 feet; thence N89°50'05"W a distance of 132.83 feet; thence N89°18'24"W a distance of 12.55 feet; thence S89°19'51 "W a distance of 18.24 feet; thence N88°23'37"W a distance of 29.04 feet; thence S89°49'16"W, parallel with the south line of said Lot 53, a distance of 199.55 feet, more or less, to a point on the Inner Harbor Line; thence S23°38'10"W, along said Inner Harbor Line, a distance of 4.90 feet to the southwest center of said Lot 53; thence N89°49'16"E, along said south line of said Lot 53, a distance of393.76 feet, more or less, to said southwest comer of said Lot 53 and the point of beginning-per King County Superior Court Case Number 00-2-32561-4 SEA under King County Recording Number 20020206000781. 3107MV ANPropertyDescription.doc • Project Narrative Project Name: 3107 Water Related Accessory Structure City of Renton Planning Division NOV 3 0 Z009 Project Location: At the private residence property of Lowell Anderson and La~~~!Q) Mountain View Ave. N, Renton, WA 98056. Project Size and Description: A detached, one story accessory structure of about 314 sq. feet and a height of about 6 feet above average grade level; constructed of concrete footings, foundation, walls, and a green roof. The structure will be set into the natural slope to reduce visibility from the lake and neighboring properties. The roof is to be a planted roof, designed to be used as an outdoor space with an arbor and swing. The arbor extends another 8 feet for a total "building height" of about 14 feet. The structure will be used for the storage of water activity related items, garden tools, and equipment for lake related use. A small WC is proposed as-well-as a utility sink. Conduit will be run from Mountain View Avenue to provide water, gas, and electrical utilities for the accessory structure. Basis for Exemption Request: Construction of an Associated Structure for a Single Family Residence for use by the Owner. Anticipated Dates of Work: March, 2010-June, 2010. Other Permits: City of Renton Building, Electrical, and Plumbing Permits Current and Proposed Use: The current use is single family R-8 with no change proposed. Special Site Features: The property is on Lake Washington. It has no wetlands, bogs, slide areas, or special habitats on it. It slopes about I foot drop to IO foot run from the street to the lake. Soil Type and Drainage: A geotechnical evaluation is in process. We anticipate soft soils at the location of the accessory structure, which may require specific engineering designs and construction methods needed to address the actual soil conditions found by the geotechnical evaluation. There are no flooding or drainage hazards on the property. Estimated Construction Costs: $40,000 Estimated Quantities and Type of Materials: We anticipate an equal cut and fill. However, if soils are unsuitable for construction, some excavation may be required. Compacted and loose drain material will be installed as required by the final engineering design. A small amount of topsoil may be needed. Tree Removal: Trees will not be removed for this project. Distances: The Project's work area may be as close as 20 feet but the accessory structure itself will be at least 25 feet from Ordinary High Water Mark of Lake Washington, as measured from an existing concrete bulkhead Nature of Shoreline: The shoreline is a combination of rocks and concrete bulkhead. • 3107 Water Related Accessory Structure-Overview Lake Washington Project Site >> COMMENTS: This is an overAew map showing the project location relalMJ to Jurladk:tlonal boundartel. The 8Cale le about 1"z:2716'. (1 :22078) W King County 3107 Water Related Accessory Structure-Overview -, '-County Boundary Legend Comprehensive Plan Land Use lnchmral Kighways • UnJ11CIOl1IOQl.ad AdMly Caitar FONll.1ty ,, Urban Growth Area Line • CommunllyBusanasCait• Agricubre # Incorporated Area N919hktflooa B lnllll4l9I Caitc MJ11J119 Streets Comnwci.11 Out.9ide of Cent .. • Gn.lWJUlban Slpanito, thghwa, Urban flbr1 Dftllllopnwlt • Kint County °'*1 Spam S)'S'lam Art..-Urt>an Reidaitial>12dv.'a: D OOiahrbW~ Local Urban R..ctential,1,12duJac D Lakes and Large Rivers U man Rlllid«1till 1 d'UJac ;./ Streams RUFal City Urban Growth Ara ~ Tribal Lands RunllTown D Parks AuratNeiullbomood Conu,•IClalCmta RunllANI 1 duJ2.5.10x (cont) ti King County 3107 Water Related Accessory Structure-Detail Map ti King County 3107 Water Related Accessory Structure-Detail Map -, I_ County Boundary Legend Parcels Ru.ralAru 1ctuJ2..510.c Contours (5ft dar1() D Parks Industrial II 100; 500; 1000 Comprehensive Plan Land Use • Fonsuy ;,/ OUt• UnlllQK'pOnlla:l A.c:tNlly Cant• At,riadlun a Public Land Survey Townships COfffl'llffl.ily 0-.. Cent• • MJN119 Highways N.ghbcMflood a.,_ cents • GnianNIIJU fNl1 Stip.,ratcw JV Incorporated Area Cot1 •••c:ial Outside of Catt ... • t0n11 County ()pan Space Sratan D 0th• Parb/Wiidernas Streets UrtNln Ptan OWlllopmm,t U19h'Ry U rbai Raidentbl > 12 dvlac Al1•illl Urban R..ctential .. 12 du.'ai; l.ocaj Urt>.an R...S.till 1 dulac D LakH and Large Rivers Rural Clly Uri>an Growth Aru ;,/ Streams AunHown ~ Tribal Lands Rural Naghbomoocl CotmWCDI Cent• (cont) m King County PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Calculations 1 @pip(~ M~P~ @rt@pi~Y{ u nn Construction Mitigation Description 2 AND 4 P~~~ Rf ~i$~1ri~\W~Yi~i~~tiprn n ' , Density Worksheet 4 Pr~i~#~# ¢Arffpi mi~mi n Drainage Report 2 Floor Plans 3 AND 4 ~~At##hri§(R~PAr\~~~~~ •; < ,,,,,,,,.,., .... Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Irrigation Plan 4 kir$9P4rw~~~#~i#>r:~•M~Pin~i§ct,n~•~:1~~•·••1 •••••,••• 1 • Landscape Plan, Conceptual• Neighborhood Detail Map 4 A#rkim~, s1ttAii~~~,• I!,• s~r~#~~pir$ f\n#lx#i#•~'•:•:••• Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services PROJECT NAME: Shoreline Exemption-3107 Water Related Accessory Structures 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building DATE: 30-Nov-09 4. Planning C:\DOCUME-1 \1owella\L OCALS-1 \T emp\wa iverofsubm ittalreqs-1 .xis 06/09 • PLANNING DIVISION ta'il WAIVIER,lF SUBMITTAL REQUIR2MIENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS : ~~~~ ~:1::i:~~~~=~'.~fAC .,.t:•, ,i,~~z~:H !:!~~:~~~~i: :: ;:: ::i: i:: :::¢~MM¢Nt~::i ::: :: :········ Plat Name Reservation 4 Pre~ppl1cat1on•Meetlng•summary•~···········; ••• Public Works Approval Letter2 Applicant Agreement Statement 2 ANO 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 ANO 3 Lease Agreement. Draft , ANO 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 ANO 3 Map of View Area 2 ANo 3 Photosimulations 2 ANO 3 This requirement may be waived by: 1 . Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building 4. Planning C:\DOCUME-1\lowella\LOCALS-1\Temp\waiverofsubmittalreqs-1.xls PROJECT NAME: Shoreline Exemption-3107 Water Related Accessory Structures DATE: 30-Nov-09 06/09 Lot 53 ~5'-:Q_" ~'-_§_" ScJt O:l:lH,-Hal t, Lm Pfug £~ Qf c«i-"' O..JS N SW Cbr. Lt. std. a,. .125'E -----~ ,,.,.. /c) ~P" '=" ,~, ,,~,,,, ----------o.,~ of Prep. u.. '.".'.'.' ,_ ' . ....,,,... ,,,_.,. --. ,.,. ~ ~ "" ·/-=..=-··"iii/:, ' ., :, -; -=-::r -·=-= ·-•1!5-Sf ... ··--,--·-=._ ""'' ' .!f=c-==-==~~====~ '' :1 ·"',cl,,{,_··;,._;, ;q;; ·j ~, i {-P :~">-',f.J"\ ,,_ l:, '--"0r, ;'.,. / ' ~~i' I {tj} C.ARQE:r-.; RcioM .·1·::..).6\~ / ~ / ; , '-Li"'-: / -1 • ~ROVIOE 17MAl'f" . . -~t·-.,~ j /) ROCK FOR 21.Z/}'::..!.. _ --..;~ ,_ --·,=J)j RET>JNING' EARTH .1;,Jir.fJ,,¥.~·,'.i.:c:fl;,~\~rt' I >11'.~ '/'' ' ' 10 REPL4CE (E) ROCKERY .' / ~, / W/ STONE ST[PS &: ;nti.,. R."1.... .. .. , f-N~ERY ._,. -+-m----·----R11eR.tatrt,gllbll ( ~ ~ ~ ro"Rto!Wi--------_ ill' . \ : / I -_,_ _J ; \l,u c«tt:re' r-..i ~ I I to aa-,,.,t . ,./ /,/ / /. -/ , J / I , _r.,.,~ /~~ / /I I // I '---,-:-:=i -+· ' !-... ::) j ( o . I / / , ) \ -"----__, --...,,,.,,,.,, !e,/ ------------~--__ (_ ------______ 'b'° S1DES&18ACK'0" / /.,y /"-<\"'-b ,,.,_,,_,,.., u;,,s,,m ;, I ' I , -------/ --__ ,_ 0-------,• Om< -1 ------------\ ' I ' / / / -,------------------ N89'49'16"E -112.BS·(c) --\ ----,------, --__ , _____ / ___ ---,..,_/-____ /1ss.2r __ __L._ _____ 1 ' ~~ 24 26 1 I 32 / /PROPERTY LINE' N 89"49'16" £ -,§~ ---------------_ _ ' of &-on Rod s..t 28 .J4 36 J8 7 ~ I ;: a: :P&tk11 I s.nt .... Rod I 0 Lot 54 ili I " ~ ::, §;::. al liit, ~ ,,, .. 1,5 t 0 .s~ w -<::., "' ---C/}q;, ___ o ... ~; w w " o,! :'5 ~i () ,11 -..J Lot 55 eo,,,,,..1. Orl.. LD9 R•lakltlg 111:11' /.J107 Mountain View Avenue I ,-----_, , ... ·~-~ i ,-;;r--------, • -Cf :-... ~ i ., --...Rcof Une -J3!03 Min View Ave. Lot 56 PARCEL NUMBER: 3342103880 I I I I • "'' "' :::, c:: !!! " ~ f ·S C) "' § C) ~ STREET ADDRESS: 3107 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE N City of Renton Planning Division NOV 3 0 2009 ~~©~~\\?~[Q) NORTH ill SITE. PLAN °1' •· a· 1s· ,2· w SCALE· 1' e 20'-0' 11..d"L-i I TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: CONCRETE W/ MTL ROOF SQUARE FOOTAGE: 266 S.F. USE: STORAGE I 1 J, -l' u ' ,g • "' "' <' qj WCCLLENI I ' I studio inc. 911 Western Ave. ! ste 550 seottle I 'NO 981CM v I 206 4-43 6484 www.woonenstudio.com C .0 0 u ,._ Q) .::.t. z -0 0 ' "' Q) 0 > co a'.) .,:: "' ~ C C .9? E > Ol 0 C -~ V) ·-.c 0 ~ ,._ -0 Q) § 3: '"O 0 . ::;: C C 0 " -O C <( -Q) C") "' PROJECT NUMBER I 0826 ~~ ... ,U,:tfnC'[j ,cw ~_"~IYI .• J.C:-:,.""' .... ----ow:~- REVISIONS I . . .,. ,,. ' z --------0 S~ORELI~; EXMP B PERMIT ~ DATE I NOV 19, 2009 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1"<'0'-0" A 1.1 f- /J) z 0 () 0:: 0 u. ti z 3107 Water Related Accessory Structure-Sen. Area I 33421,00315 ff. ,I ti King County 3107 Water Related Accessory Structure-Sen. Area -, '-County Boundary D Legend 100 Year Floodplain Land II.ad Dnuruive Contours (5ft dark) Channel Migration H.a:r.ard SWOM Water Quality # 100; !IOO; 1000 Areas Oaia Wat• Qu y Trul.malt ;v' Otha MODCRATE • SanMM LIM T flllflmalt CAO Shoreline Condition scvau: • DOG Drainage Alu ~ H,vll m Sole Source Aquifer SWOM Flow Control ~ M.S,um m SAO Wetland • Bait Flow C011tro4 ~ Low ~ SAO Landslide • Con..valion ,1ow Contlol C Public Land Survey Townships ffl SAO Coal Mine • Flood Probllm ,1ow Contlol Highways ~ SAO Seismic CAO Basin Condition /V Incorporated Area SAO Erosion • llegh Streets ~ Chinook Distribution D Modlllffl thuh-, • Sensitive Area Notice on Title D Low A.rt.-• Drainage Complaints CAO Tributary Basins l.oc:al Areas Susceptible to Lowa Tnbutary a-. Parcels Groundwater Contamination D Uppar Tri>Uury O-,s • Wildlife Network • • Low SAO Stream • Mad,um ~ Clnsl • lfegh C1na 2 ,._,nilll Critical Aquifer Recharge Area # CIHI 2 Salmonid /V c1m, • Catego,y 1 • Cauuo,y2 . . . Undallfad D Lakea and Large Rivers Cauuo,y3 /V Streams SWOM Landslide Hazards ~ Floodway landslide fl~ (contt m King County C KIN.; COIJJ,,"f'Y t,'SISCORPO'-AT'FU ARP.AS ,~, IAkt Washington D ooon,..., ... u_ .... ,....,_,. tOUllD--U-,w, 1 ! IONt •·· ~ ./1:: -l()t<IJ -0 CITY 01' 1!.~ION •=• , I -. I l .••. G LEGEND CJ ~ . .v.:~ .. ::::""" _,, -----.. :::::;. .... :: ':...-:..:: _ .. --~·-· .. ----·----_ .. ____ _ -· ._. .... _..__._. _ __ .._ ... __ _ .. -------0 ~-.. :.:;.:;;:.-:-- D -....... ---------- GD D _'"::.._----· ...... _ --------§' ::-:..,-=. ,_ .... -... ___ .. ..,_ ---··-:.--~ .. =-= N(lllS ~-= =z::=:-:·:.=.:=t:= ;;_:; .:;::::~:.. ~:: .. =: ::-.:."':" ______ ......... __ ... ______ _ == =--=-"; :-~ ':' ... -...= ::::: = -:..-;.: :-_ .. .:.-=:.-::.. -.:: ~':,. "=:?S-:?_"-:r'.:.= ::::--=---·-·- _ .. ____ _ ~ ...... -----_.__,._,,, ___ --·----- ::.., ________ -· _,,_ ........ FIRM FlDGD lkSIJWICE RATE IIAP '. ' ~~~n~¥m?'·,um ,, ·, INCORPORATED ARF.AS ,, · ;·I ' ,un "4 Oflm ' -----··-- CC:: MAP IIUIH[R """""'' ........ IUYtl,"'5 Planning Division NOV 3 0 1009 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVEt",oF SUBMITTAL REQUIR. ..... MENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Ca/culalions 1 C::#i#r~1 r#~#~iP(Pi#i:>1#f ii : , ... Construction Mitigation Description 2 AND 4 p~~8 \i(~i~mppf)f\l~y p~~@i\ipff :'! U Y< ' Density Worksheet 4 p/~1m~~~•9prt/ 91:F1~n~ : nr> · • · . Drainage Report 2 $i~W~i,rn~:%ni:ni\%iYr~i\#NJJ) :: ,, Environmental Checklist 4 $¥,@n~ 2pf~H~Ht~<B~s#r~~1 spfo,if: : > , Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Irrigation Plan 4 kin~•RPHITTti:/i-#~~#~p@ry\~p·try~ip~~#m§i\~4········:······ Landscape Plan, Conceptual, Legal Description 4 M~Pfif;*l~tirQ ~i\# F9Mi 1@i#i ? • > • • . Master Application Form 4 ry\p@@~8t s#r1~ tP~t i?~hrnrnrrn~rn,i , ? •< , Neighborhood Detail Map 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1 . Property Services PROJECT NAME 3 iD1 lfvl\ +ev £ e\o:te& \l\tcesP1 ' 3-\Y(,(,~ 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building DATE: [\ l~/Oj 4. Planning H:\CED\Data\Forms· Templates \Self ·Help Handouts\Planning\waiverofsubmlttalreqs .xis 06/09 ~ PLANNING DIVISION WAIVE~F SUBMITTAL REQUIRMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS WA~P•Y$§•e~RM!ITT$V$MiIT4~ / < U~EQUJR-1:!IIIIENTSU Y' > ' ' Plat Name Reservation 4 Urban Design Regulations Analysis 4 @i@#~ii:'1a,{q~d~r#iifi~~:~ :.: : n:n ') > ' ,,.,., .... · Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4 Wetlands Report/Delineation 4 Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions ,ANDJ Map of View Area , AND 3 Photosimulations 2 AND 3 'WAIVED: 'NiOO!RIEP H)ijyt\ 'Ht 1tYnnt' This requirement may be waived by: · 1. Property Services PROJECT NAME, 31 D] u.Ja1.e( (ela:kd .A ws:i~ / j6WC-\vf ~ DATE: U 30 0 '.j 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building 4. Planning , I I H:\CEO\Data\F orms-T emplates\Self -Help Handouts\Planning\waiverofsubmitta lreqs. x!s 06/09 i I ! I , I i ' i ' . ' . I ! ; SYM A Existing 1"op of Sank -~·----.. " " 28'-0 1 0 I -0" 1 2 ' -o" 1 2 I •• ~ \ 11 , _ _:.:.:::-...:.-.,-''1 ') TRANS (JS') \sheet pile depth (~~TH DEPTH OEf'T..-/ \ Timber Bulkhead -"t-, Sheet Pile --- Inv. 24.0 -, • • • ----::11 ____ .... ' -~-'. ..,.---""'"'" I -------1 ------ } -•· I -- I \ \ \ ' l I --\ \\ \ 12" Outfall -- • I 1 \ I \ I \ \ l I I \ \ ""O \\ \ : \\ C: \I '('.) \\ ,'6 I i \ t \ I \ \ I l Outside Corner Work Peint ' \ \ I ,~ r ---1 -, I \ I I I \ \.. I \ \ \ 1 I 11 \Vll \I I D \ .... ---- \ t ' _\ _____ _ , Cf. of paven-1:.'.:'..--___ -----,--1 • \ ' I \ \ \ I \ --, \ I \ • I 1 \ I \ l \ 1 \ I I . \ \ I • I \ \ \ \ I \ \ l \ \ \ -\ ~ \ 1 \r0 ,o \; I C: 11 , '< I I \ \ \ I \ I -\ t \ I \ ' \ I \ RE.'11SION BY APPROVED DATE Rf."1SION REPAIR NORTH BRIDGE 8860731 ROSS PN M.NAKHJIRI 11.03.09 \ 11, \ ~--~ _.\\.--,-I I -\\ \ t \ 15 - \\ I \ \ \?-\L-+-Ex~ting lal1II< e d \ I 1 \ ,\\'I-~ \I, '1 ,r\o' h I I I II I I \ 'J \~ I ... . I , __ l\ \ l I \\ \ II I 11 ~---- 'J Below 0 I (25'1 • I lfl DEPTH - ~PAI fxisting Hinged Slab '"'-Edge of Pavement Existing Bulkhead _ _, BY DATE KE WASHINGTON LA . ----------------. f 4• it f!' ~ Clan 50 eo,t Iron PFp• under toke to Bryn Mawr Sewa9"11 Tntatm&nt Plant. _______ .._ ________ _ ----------------------. _.., ____ . ____ _ -.... + WB-1 " . o·-o h 15·=_g:0·~~1 z~·-::o~~~ \--~2:r2-7'.::' ·:52°-~~J;S') (TRANS) ?f ;~H Sheet pife depth bEPTl-l DEPTH -- --...... , \\ ....--Existing Timbe ----_..,__ --- --- I \ I \ \ ,.__ 1-J/4"C, 3 #10, 440V \ \ I \ . \ \ 8 fk~d Top of Bonk \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ ' \ ·-___ ...... ., --r\- Outside corner ---\ ---~---\ \ Q--------\ \ I \ I I 3 INSTALL UTILITY s2 S3 CLIPS, 110 EACH~ -···11 -----_-----..........--,. ""' - --- ' \ I \ I \ \ REPAIR PILE CAP, 12' 2 S2 S3 \ \ \ I \ () ti"\ 0 )> ?J ?J < rt\ ::0 \ I \ I \ I \ ' \ } ,_ ,-, I I ,_ l'.JI Af.J VIEW -~ -................... ~ Werk Pain( --- Existing \ \ \ . . ' \ I I i I • I ulk,fepd ' I I \ 1 I l \ ACCEPTABILITY THIS DESIGN AND/OR SPECIFICATION IS APPROVED APPROVED BY DEPT. DATE \ l I t I I I 1 I I I I I \ (25') DEPTH \ I \, ll \ \\ ti \\ I - ~--41-,,._ ~ I l Ii 1 I \1 ii I I ' 0 • I o, I REPAIR BEARING 1 \ CAPS, 3 EACH I S2 S3 \ ~ \ -+---E:xistin9 Hinged · Slob I \ -- --, -----__.------------1 I I l \ • ' ' -- I \ I \ ~ \ , \ ' t \ i \ I \ I \ \ \ \, \ \ . \ \ I \ ----tt \ STAGING AREA • • • • • • • • • • • • • 3 O" C p S S I I I •••••••••~•c=====~~------- ~-Existing Bulkhead 1 • -~------ \ I I I I I \ _____________ ------ (~ity of Renton Pfanninq Division NOV 2 4 2009 :::E Q. U) "' ,.... -.. --.-==-------·--------------r:,=,..,...,==---=;;,.---l""nTT.,,..------1-SUBTITlE CURRENT REVISION SYMBOL A DATE .......... ---+-1-2._10_.o-+a=-=--------P_R_O_J_E_C_T_P_LA_N _______ ----11-.s"'Hm...--B_B6_0_7_31.,L_ ___ -+ __ 1_1._03_._o9_--1! TITLE REPAIR NORTH BRIDGE S2 S-5 ~ NORTH CEIJAR RIVER BRIDGE h=JOB""'No.----~coM""'P N.s--o. -~J~ b--__::B=.86::.::0:.:.7::..31'------'--------l "' RENTON DWG NO. RTN-NBRDG-S2 R D STRUCTURAL MASTER ,.. 00 NOT lYPE HERE ,.. SYM A e,e • 17',p'.J:1;.DN!t 11el=!ATl:'.D 11M6E:R. 6Ul.l.~All/:QN ~ K8~·1 ~-d~t;,i:.lNli:TRE/l,TE.D TIM~Et<:. 61."0GKINt, @ s,,' ~~ ""'; · -- I I. {'.'.:.I -/\)·1-(- ,. '' 1 ' ·'' ' '' . '. ,,; •· "! . ··. ·,,' ' ,, ' -·· ,,:; : . r· . ' -- '~ -···'E·v:15-r ·t.o· .,,,.,-. ,.,_,_. ""'"'·'" .... , .. , ,,. , . ,,,.,. . .t."·"'···· v.-.;r-.tr:~.,.~ 1 ..• :·_ ....... , .. ·-,·;~. ,_._. ,. ·: -:;,::;:. • ..1, •.•.. :_. X -. ·.iUIIST,• .AIRCJRAFT:·l:JC.HT ,_ PDWl:R · ---... _,.,,,,.,., •... /oNP-urr-.--;r,,, R" ... A1·, ·-"'o"' _ ... _ iyr.;.~ .. ·-'"' _ .. _ . ·/J~-J;:;,1·1 . N• rt .. r,. : _ c,·-,ew·<•A·apu•1:;,r-:·p1;111Nli --·· ti ' -~ . ..,,...., ' . ,. _,.,... . .,. ' '' ~~--- • Q 'I (\J MA1N1AIN ~Xl51"1Nc::i 3' 1/J DRAIN HOL~5 (TY;P.) . • It; PILe: ,Ii I ' ) . . ' P/LE:,i,1, : . ' i II--, IVe'fV. I I C,,;!Wr;'ROAi'T 11 -G.I~ ( R4~LLEL ( W fr X t:.8) - 11 1 , , PILI: ' ' c:_--tt=X(S.T ~" S-'Aa TO t3/:NT LIN.:) q~,R l'.7" ~ ~ . ' . . I " .3/" FROM P/LE.-# I 7" '---4-LO/VGITV.0//V.AL 8VIL'T·t./P ,g; .ac-.vr G/R.DeR (tVEW) lrr,.,....-!I FILE -,/1, / "++---..: 4 >< 4 • 'lz." iOP 4 "O'fTOM (iYP. ( 4) PLAC::.ES) -I I 11 I 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 i,-·• ... , ,, " ·, i' ' " .,.,,' < ' ... '' I fl- \ .,,,,. f . . : ' .•. 11 11 11 11 11 I 11 11 11 I --. - ' 1-I I - I I I • --------------------------------------------------- ' I ' I I (' 1 11 I I I I 11 11 I I ~-. ' i='.Xl".>-r: eLe.t:-'TRI C.At. ~X. 10 F'.C:MA-1 N. , -Uc PWb, E:. I , ~J" MP.INTAIN E.X1'51. :;o," 1/J DRAIN HOL.E.5 (TYP.) - E:X 1ST, IZ • IZ 11MBfl? 15ULL.R'AIL -ro e,1:. _RE'MoVED EP~Jc. OF EXIS1. 4'' ,oNL, OV~RLA'( ' .,,:·f,i;; ... , ·, -:.~·.u} ·i; APPROX. 49'.3" APPROX 49'-'i''. . , ''Jc,i ·,, i,,;---1--------,---~-,---------------------~--------E)',J$T, t.ot-J,. OVE'RLJ.\Y ex1s-r. A5PHAL-1 ,oN,RE.Tr. -·.•·:./:':• i OV!::Rl.AY ' • I;) ,, \\j ' •" -:.-.·~--·--~ ---., . . .· . ·-' f·- :1,·· 2~~:...i-·"-+-1-------+----=--....,4;c!_:;'--=;j:....:.~~~=~'-"---r------"'"-+-/-... .---___________ ....c.:;,=c5::..'__:..o_" ____________ --'-+.....,.---+-------'4:..:·1_'-..:::5::..~::.cri(~~,.._'_' --------'-+-+..:;2;.-~'1' ~ C,ENr-#: I (qx;sr.) <l" eV-'NT # 2 (eXlf)l) 152' -II !Ja If 'it BFN.Z-4 s (ex1stj ~ l!JEN.r' #"'1-(EXl$T.) -, '' ---·-~--- ·-, ··ss·c1· 1·0N' . ··. ' .. :,. . . • .. : ; .. , ·:.>>··:.,;,_ ,. . ---• ·uJ>,., .,-._::·· .... , . . .. . . -..... ~,-.. --_:~;.-, .-;· ,. -Ch--~:i-:- -F/d!LP YE,0/ry( ,S<!f.R:>e-f ,.._,.,94/P/0';/.b.N . . . , -:.:: ;.;,, .. : '. · '·-'-' -·--•-'• .. 14·_~ 1'-o•J; ·.:. ·1+:_':• .;.,;. ' ,,., ·. p\l· -,: ' '' ".·-.·-:':.··::):·,: ... ' ' . PLAN ' · . ;.,, ;cJ: · Ii' -.· :,:-~'} &:~ or~r. s~e, C-'"'f '. h-. :•,'., ' • >"--CUR,8 · = ,..__,., .. _ .. ,., __ · )."'""'>,· -----~ ~--~'.( -~.1:;.r1.,:, ,-+.-~_p:;;:i_ ---!t=t;=;;:====-=-:,:1 ::+. =======:===============::::;;:::i:;:=============================================;;t=n=-;z:.==========================:;;:::;;:.t-:_::l'.c::: . ,,I_ -,-,,,!~:.;-----·----. .,--~_.-·.---~~ . . ... -. j i ' ----II /1,i~:0 II ~-9:' II ;;•s.nr~, "'t r-1 ;r' 111 1::1/CiH w.4ree a.= ;4,r;,a., I 11 , 111 ~ I 11 ··' ,~.;-,;:, .. -, '11' .. ~ I 11 ----~·' ·111 ~~/;:, · __ ..... "9' .; , -'~" + ".i>jl 7 I II I : Law wArcR 1:1...=12.r;,s' //1 1 i\ 1 Ji'~\ · I 1 11 ---...::::.~filli:> 1.1 :~ -,-;, ~ -< :'.iii:§~ ; ! i / 1 I I I ----1 ! I I\ \ ~1·,_:~l,r,-~-. 11,11~ 11 ,11\1. _ _ 1 _ I I ~ \ LALL 1=x1sr1N<r P11-1::; ARe f I I \ .'LJ UI : !;fit] .LJw,w . ": u 11 IU /t:."0-~ STe'eL PIP',ff Li '· \J . U·Uu w LJ LJ g REv1SlON REPAIR NORTH BRIDGE -~, IJ2A,7.fl/M L!.$.~"Q.~{(iJ,."$.. MEAN SU L.cVet. F'R'r:llill't(~H MA!i!J(, L.985 - .lC/.(Qq]:Ao;J(1$.rft1£NT 6l, /9,4~Z' BY APPRO'IED DAlE SYM 8860731 J.ANDRE M.NAKHJIRI 09.21.09 REv1SION BY NOTE: ' ACTUAL RIVER CHANNEL BOTTOM DEPTH AT THE NORTH CEDAR RIVER BRIDGE IS DETERMINED BY OTHERS. 5£CTION~Sf/OW/NG NORTH G/£0£2 :QST. SLA(S Nt:JT $'f/'7i',W , /_ -II ~ ,,- BCAL e -).s = I ,,--Q APPROVED DAlE IIIIEI.ND® ACCEPTABILITY THIS DESIGN AND/OR SPECIFICATION IS APPROVED APPROVED BY DEPT. DATE City of Renton , P/.:i,·Jn/nq Division NO\' 2 4 ZU09 fPd lt1 CC [ff II W' ~ /QJ ---,, ~ m09,-.2-1.0-9--rc;;5 umE!TlTIEme""----:Oc:-::R~l,-:=G,-:-:IN:--:--A'C""'.L:--.:B=R-=-=10:-:G::--:E=-=P.,...LA-:-N:--c-c&-Sc::-:E=-c=r=1-=o-N-----,-,c=uR=RENT~R=EVl=sio=N-=SYM=B=oL-A--OA=JE------l~ --t----t;,""'----~F-"""cLO~O;.,D~H~AZ.A~~R~D~D:!,,A:..'..T~A _____ --1'""'sH=EET:;.---a_a6_0_73_1~---1---0_9_.2_1._09_---it M.NAKHJIRI 09.21.09 TTTlE REPAIR NORTH BRIDGE S6 s 9 -i-----t--+--tc"'1?";S~~D~--+-'-cc.=-'--'-1 • ~ NORTH CEDAR RIVER BRIDGE t.;,Jo'-'BN"'"""o.--88-607_3_1 ----t=coM=--P=~i-P>-S-PR-OJ---t; 1-=~----~---'----'-""---'--=--c.:.:.::-=----1 (!) RENTON DWG NO. RTN-NBRDG-S6 STRUCTURAL MASTER *~• 00 NOT TYPE HERE *" --------·---------------------------------------~-----------------------------··-·--·------------,-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~-----------i SYM RE\11SION A REPAIR NORTI-i BRIDGE q 4 4 EXISTING CONCRETE DECK PANEL q ,4 " -•• 4 . " -.. ---• 4 4 •, <I· . 4 <I REMOVE EXISTING 11x14 TIMBER " <I . . . q <I 4 4 . 4 <I . -· A • " <I .. -. 4 ii·' 4 •• ·<I . EXISTING CAP REPAIR SCALE: 1 "= 1 '-0" 1 "~ CONDUIT ADD AT 4' O.C. WHERE MISSING, ESTIMATE (6) TOTAL CONDUIT SUPPORT SCALE: N/A BY APPRO'IED [ ,1 . ,1 <! 4 <! L] ----,IA ,1 <! 4 <! • ·4 DATE SYM 8860731 ,ROSS PNI M.NAKHJIRI 09.21.09 ) ' 4 <! . ,1. 4 L] . <! <I <! S1 ,S2 S3 " 4 " • <I <I ~ -------- 4 4 RE.'i1SION EXISTING CONCRETE DECK PANEL <I " " ·-" . <I • . " 4 <I• . 4 <I REPLACE WITH NEW TIMBER, CUT TO FIT <I " ;i " - q . 4 <I .. . <I 4 4 <I .. •• " - •-· • • NEW BY 4 -. • " 4 <I .. 4 ... .. "1 . .. 4 4 <I DATE " 4. <I 4 <I -'\, 4 ---• 4 <I 4 • 4 4 ( 1 ', S1 ,S2 S3 BIIEIND® - <I " " " .. •• ----• " EXISTING CONCRETE DECK PANEL <I " 4 • • " . <I . <I 4 4 4 .. <I . 4 <I. .. . . " .. . . -<I . ·4 . <I . . ' 4 <I EXISTING CONCRETE DECK PANEL 4 .. .. 4 . " . q . . 4 4 . " <I . 4 ,, '<1 . 4 " <I .,, . - <I· .:I·. d .. <I· •• 'A REMOVE EXISTING GROUT <I <I . . <I A -'----'\v--•~ • EXISTING GROUT REPAIR SCALE: 1"=1'-0" .4 ACCEPTABILllY ~ 7-31-97 THIS DESIGN AND/OR OF!£Cl<Eli...---+-'--~-'-'-J SPECIFICATION IS APPROVED 1--Af'-PR-O-VE_D_BY_,--DE-PT-. ,--DA_JE_ ~' ..,,-----+------f "' AccR D AccR 4 4 SUBTITLE TITLE . 4 <I· REPLACE GROUT DETAILS • • .• <I ,:• ~· ...... ~· ~-,:;. .. •:.:· ... ~-.~~~ ..... i.,:.' ..•... ~ A NEW REPAIR NORTH BRIDGE 4 NORTH CEDAR RIVER BRIDGE STRUCTURAL MASTER ''* llO NOT TfPE HERE - 4 . . ... ·<I -4 <I 4 • 4 .. 4 4 S1 ,S2 S3 CURRENT RE'v!SION SYMBOL 8860731 SHEET S3 JOB NO. 8860731 A City of Rentor1 Pfanninq Division NOV 2 4 1009 DATE 09.21.09 S-6 COMP NO. Y&P>S PROJ RENTON DWG NO. RTN-NBRDG-S3 9: co 0 "' ~ "' t -•• ,., 0, ,., -:s "' l I 1 I I ' t' Ji'/' ' I I I I [i'L t11 1 • ! I GENERAL NOTEQ GENERAL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFORM TO ALL REGULATIONS FOR WORK PERFORMED ON BOEING PROPERTY, IN THE PUBLIC WATERWAY AND NEAR THE RENTON AIRPORT. PERMITS OBTAINED BY THE BOEING COMPANY ARE PROVIDED IN THE BID DOCUMENTS. ALL OTHER PERMITS SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR. APPLICABLE CODES ALL LOCAL CODES PLUS THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS AND CODES ARE PART OF THESE GENERAL NOTES: 1 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 2006 EDITION 2 AWS D1 .1 STRUCTURAL WELDING CODE -CURRENT EDITION 3 ACl-318 BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE 4 ASTM SPECIFICATIONS IN THE EVENT THAT THERE IS A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE ABOVE REFERENCES AND THESE GENERAL NOTES THE FOLLOWING PRIORITY WILL BE FOLLOWED: 1 ALL PROJECT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS 2 THESE GENERAL NOTES 3 LOCAL CODES 4 THE SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS AND CODES LISTED ABOVE IN ORDER OF PRECEDENCE. MA.rERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION GENERAL THE FOLLOWING SECTION COVERS ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THIS PROJECT. ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS ARE COVERED IN THE VARIOUS SUB-SECTIONS AND ON THE PLANS.. REQUIREMENTS COVERED IN THE SUB-SECTIONS SUPERSEDE THOSE IN THIS SECTION IN CASE OF CONFLICT. MATERIALS NOT SPECIFICALLY NOTED IN THESE GENERAL NOTES OR ELSEWHERE ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITIED BY THE SUPPLIER FOR APPROVAL. APPROVAL WILL BE flASED ON CONFORMANCE TO CURRENT STANDARDS UTILIZED BY THE OWNER. ALL MATERIALS MUST CONFORM TO GOOD WORKMANSHIP, ACCEPTABLE INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCTION NOT MENTIONED IN THESE GENERAL NOTES SHALL BE PERFORMED USING REASONABLE CARE AND GOOD CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES. FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF ALL WORK NOT SPECIFICALLY INCLUDED IN THESE GENERAL NOTES OR ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER. APPROVAL OF ALL METHODS AND PRODUCTS SHALL lJE BASED UPON CONFORMANCE TO THE GENERAL NOTES, DRAWINGS, QUALITY OF WORKMANSHIP, APPLICABLE INDUSTRY STANDARDS, AND PERTINENT MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. MATERIALS ( IF APPLICABLE ) STRUCTURAL STEEL MISCELLANEOUS PLATES AND SHAPES SHALL BE ASTM A36, GALVANIZED. BOLTS ALL BOLTS SHALL MEET ASTM A307 OR ASTM A36 OR SIMILAR REQUIREMENTS AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AND SHALL BE HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED. GALVANIZED MALLEABLE IRON WASHERS SHALL BE USED IN ALL AREAS WHERE THE BOLT HEAD OR NUT SHALL BEAR AGAINST WOOD, EXCEPT UNDER ECONOMY HEADS. TIMBER ALL SAWN TIMBER SHALL CONFORM TO #1 COAST REGION DOUGLAS FIR OR BETTER ACCORDING TO WCLIB GRADING RULES, TREATED. TIMBER TREATMENT TREATMENT SHALL BE ACZA. ALL SAWN TIMBER SHALL BE INCISED AND PRESSURE TREATED ACCORDING TO AWPA C2 FOR TIMBERS IN FRESH WATER APPLICATION. TIMBER PILES SHALL BE TREATED ACCORDING TO AWPA C3 FOR PILES IN FRESH WATER APPLICATION. AZCA SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM NET RETENTION OF 0.40 POUNDS PER CUBIC FEET IN THE ASSAY ZONE. TIMBER COMPONENTS SHALL BE CUT TO LENGTH, DRILLED, DAPPED, AND SHAPED AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL BEFORE PRESSURE TREATING. ANY FIELD FABRICATION OR DAMAGE SHALL BE REPAIRED PER AWPA M4. ALL TIMBER MEMBERS BEING MANUFACTURED SHALL BE PRODUCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT INDUSTRY BMP (BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES). GALVANIZING ALL STEEL AND HARDWARE SHALL BE HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED PER ASTM A123 OR A153 AFTER FABRICATION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. DAMAGED GALVANIZING, INCLUDING THAT REMOVED FOR WELDING SHALL BE REPAIRED BY STICK GALVANIZING WITH ZINC OR ALUMINUM ALLOY STICKS TO A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 12 MILLS. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT REPAIR MATERIAL AND METHODS OF REPAIR FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. NON SHRINK GROUT GROUT SHALL BE A FLOWABLE NON SHRINK GROUT SUCH THAT THE MINIMUM FC = 6,000. USE MASTER BUILDERS SET 45 OR APPROVED EQUAL. CONSTRUCTION GENERAL THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED IN ANY MANNER SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. DEMOLITION DEMOLITION SHALL CONSIST OF REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF ALL MATERIALS IN THE AREAS TO BE RECONSTRUCTED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND AS REQUIRED BY THE PERMITS. STAGING AREA THE UPLAND STAGING AREA NOTED ON THE PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BLOCK THE ACCESS TO ADJOINING PROPERTIES OR TRAFFIC. ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE CONTRACTOR OR HIS SUB CONTRACTORS TO THE PROPERTY OR ADJOINING PROPERTY SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE USE OF THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO CLEAN THE SITE STAGING AREA AS PART OF THE FINAL CLEANUP WORK ON THE PROJECT. SUBMITIALS THE ENGINEERS REVIEW OF SUBMITIALS WILL BE FOR GENERAL CONFORMANCE ONLY AND IT SHALL REMAIN THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CONFORM TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. ANY INTENDED DEVIATION FROM THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS MUST BE SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER TO BE ACCEPTABLE SHOP DRAWINGS OF ALL FABRICATED MATERIALS SHALL BE SUBMITIED TO THE ENGINEER FOR WRITIEN APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION OR MOBILIZATION OF AN'.' ITEM. A MINIMUM OF FOUR SETS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH SUBMITIAL, OF WHICH TWO WILL BE RETURNED TO THE CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD ALLOW TWO WEEKS FROM THE TIME OF RECEIPT FOR REVIEW OF SUBMITIALS BY THE ENGINEER FOR A REASONABLE NUMBEfl OF DRAWINGS. CERTIFICATIONS, MANUFACTURERS DATA AND OTHER INFORMATION FOR ALL MATERIALS, INCLUDING THOSE NOT SPECIFICALLY NOTED IN THESE NOTES OR SHOWN ON INDIVIDUAL DRAWINGS, SHALL BE SUBMITIED TO THE ENGINEER FOR WRITIEN APPROVAL TO VERIFY CONFORMANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS DO NOT SPECIFICALLY REFERENCE A MATERIAL, THE APPROVAL OF MATERIALS WILL BE BASED ON ITS CONFORMANCE TO THE 2006 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. ALL METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THESE GENERAL NOTES, GOOD WORKMANSHIP, GENERALLY ACCEPTED INDUSTRY STANDARDS, AND MANUFACTURERS rJECOMMENDATIONS. THE FOLLOWING IS A PARTIAL LIST OF REQUIRED SUBMITIALS FOR THE PROJECT. THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE LIST AS IT WILL VARY DEPENDING UPON THE CONTRACTORS METHODS. CONSTRUCTION PLANS (INCLUDES PLAN DRAWINGS AND WRITIEN DESCRIPTION OF METHODS): 1. STAGING AREA PLAN -INCLUDING DATES OF USE AND SECURITY. 2. ALL COMPONENT INSTALLATION METHODS AND EQUIPMENT. 3. DAILY OPERATION REPORTS -FURNISH WEEKLY (INCLUDES PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT). SHOP DRAWING PLANS. 1. STRUCTURAL STEEL. 2. STRUCTURAL TIMBER. MATERIALS CERTIFICATIONS SUBMITIALS: 1. GROUT MIX AND ASSOC. ITEMS WITH TESTING. 2. STRUCTURAL TIMBER. 3. STRUCTURAL STEEL. 4. HARDWARE. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR ACZA USES AND SPECIFICATIONS ACZA (AMMONIACAL COPPER ZINC ARSENATE) AND ACA (AMMONIACAL COPPER ARSENATE) ARE ACCEPTED FOR A FULL RANGE OF SALT AND FRESH WATER APPLICATIONS IN THE AMERICAN WOOD-PRESERVERS' ASSOCIATION (AWPA) BOOK OF STANDARDS. BECAUSE OF ITS ABILITY TO TREAT DOUGLAS FIR (AS WELL AS OTHER SPECIES) ACZA/ACA IS MOST PREVALENT ON THE WEST COAST. THE SPECIFIC COMMODITY STANDARDS THAT SHOULD BE USED TO SPECIFY THE PREPARATION AND USE OF VARIOUS ACZA AND ACA TREATED PRODUCTS USED IN AND ABOVE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS ARE: C2 --LUMBER, TIMBERS, BRIDGE TIES AND MINE TIES, PRESSURE TREATMENT C3 --PILES C14 --WOOD FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION C18 --MATERIAL IN MARINE CONSTRUCTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES THE BMPS FOR ACZA/ACA ARE TO ENSURE THAT FIXATION OCCURS PRIOR TO THE MATERIAL LEAVING THE TREATING FACILITY. IN ORDER TO ASSURE FIXATION, THE FOLLOWING BMPS SHALL BE FOLLOWED: TREATMENT PROCEDURES • TREAT USING CHEMICALS SPECIFIED BY AWPA STANDARD P5 FOR WATERBORNE PRESERVATIVES. • FOLLOW GOOD HOUSEKEEPING PRACTICES TO MINIMIZE SAWDUST AND OTHER SURFACE RESIDUES ON THE WOOD PRODUCTS PRIOR TO TREATMENT. >AFTER TREATMENT BY EITHER THE BETHEL (FULL CELL) PROCESS OR THE LOWRY (MODIFIED EMPTY CELL) PROCESS, A FINAL VACUUM OF 22" SHALL BE APPLIED FOR A MINIMUM OF TWO HQURS. THE RETORT SHOULD BE HEATED · TO BETWEEN 180'F AND 21 O'F DURING THE VACUUM PROCESS. NOTE: IF THE LOWRY (MODIFIED EMPTY CELL) PROCESS CAN BE USED TO OBTAIN THE SPECIFIED PRODUCT RETENTION, IT IS THE PREFERRED PROCESS FOR PRODUCTS TO BE USED IN AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS. • AFTER REMOVAL FROM THE RETORT, THE MATERIALS SHALL REMAIN ON THE DRIP PAD UNTIL ALL DRIPPAGE HAS CEASED. POST TREATING PROCEDURES PRIOR TO SHIPMENT MATERIAL FOR AQUATIC APPLICATIONS SHALL BE PROCESSED UNDER ONE OR A COMBINATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES: • MINIMUM PLANT HOLDING TIME --PRODUCTS (WITH TREATING STICKERS IN PLACE FOR SAWN AND PLYWOOD PRODUCTS) SHALL BE HELD IN A STORAGE AREA WITH FREE AIR CIRCULATION FOR A MINIMUM OF THREE WEEKS AT AMBIENT TEMPERATURES EQUAL TO OR EXCEEDING 60'F. IF THE AMBIENT TEMPERATURE IS LESS THAN 60'F, KILN DRYING OR ANOTHER SOURCE OF ARTIFICIAL HEAT SHALL BE USED TO ACHIEVE THE 60'F REQUIREMENT. • POST TREATMENT KILN DRYING --PRODUCTS SHALL BE KILN DRIED TO A MAXIMUM OVEN DRY BASIS MOISTURE CONTENT OF 30% IN THE SPECIFIED TREATED ZONE EMPLOYING A KILN CYCLE OF 120'F TO 160'F DRY BULB TEMPERATURE. ASTM METHOD D442-84, USING INCREMENT BORING, SHALL BE USED TO DETERMINE THAT THE MOISTURE CONTENT REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN MET. • IN-RETORT AMMONIA REMOVAL PLUS PLANT HOLDING TIME --PLANTS EQUIPPED TO FOLLOW THIS PROCEDURE WILL FIND IT A HIGHLY EFFECTIVE METHOD FOR ENSURING FIXATION. AFTER THE FINAL VACUUM PERIOD, WITH HEAT, THE RETORT DOOR SHALL BE OPENED AND AMBIENT AIR DRAWN THROUGH THE TREATED WOOD CHARGE FROM THE DOOR TO THE REAR OF THE RETORT TO A SCRUBBER AT A RATE OF 250 CFM, MINIMUM, FOR A PERIOD OF THREE HOURS. THE TREATED WOOD PRODUCT IS THEN HANDLED IN THE SAME MANNER AS UNDER "MINIMUM PLANT HOLDING TIME" DESCRIBED ABOVE EXCEPT THE MINIMUM HOLDING TIME IS ONE WEEK AT AMBIENT TEMPERATURES OF 60' OR MORE RATHER THAN THREE WEEKS. MAXIMUM CHEMICAL LOADING TREATING SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO SEEK TO MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF CHEMICAL PLACED INTO THE WOOD WHILE ASSURING CONFORMANCE WITH THE AWPA RETENTION AND PENETRATION REQUIREMENTS. VISUAL INSPECTION THE ACZA/ACA TREATED PRODUCT SHALL BE VISUALLY INSPECTED PRIOR TO LEAVING THE TREATMENT PLANT TO INSURE THAT NO EXCESSIVE RESIDUAL MATERIALS OR PRESERVATIVE DEPOSITS EXIST. TECHNICAL NOTES BECAUSE OF ITS ABILITY TO TREAT DOUGLAS FIR (AS WELL AS OTHER SPECIES), ACZA/ACA IS MOST PREVALENT ON THE WEST COAST FOR USE IN PILING AND AQUATIC APPLICATIONS. "FIXATION" IS THE TERM APPLIED TO THE CHEMICAL REACTION IN WHICH THE ACTIVE INGREDIENTS WITHIN THE 'IIATERBORNE TREATING SOLUTION BECOME FIXED WITHIN THE WOOD CELLS RESULTING IN LEACH RESISTANCE AND DURABILITY OF THE PRODUCT. FAILURE TO HAVE ACHIEVED FIXATION AT TIME OF INSTALLATION INCREASES THE POTENTIAL FOR THE TREATING CHEMICALS TO LEACH INTO THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT. THE KEY TO THE TREATING PROCESS FOR ACZA AND ACA IS THE AMMONIA WHICH FACILITATES CARRYING THE ACTIVE INGREDIENTS INTO THE CELL STRUCTURE OF THE WOOD DURING THE TREATMENT PROCESS. WHEN THE AMMONIA IS EVAPORATED OUT OF THE PRODUCT, THE REMAINING INGREDIENTS BECOME FIXED AND OPPORTUNITY FOR LEACHING IS MINIMIZED. IF TOO MUCH AMMONIA REMAINS IN THE PRODUCT WHEN IT IS PLACED INTO AN AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT THEN CHEMICALS CAN BE RELEASED INTO THE SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT. THE BMP PROCEDURES ARE DESIGNED TO ACCELERATE THE REMOVAL OF THE AMMONIA AND MINIMIZE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR CHEMICAL LEACHING. MAXIMUM CHEMICAL LOADING --EARLIER EFFORTS TO SET PRECISE MAXIMUM CHEMICAL LOADING LEVELS HAVE PROVEN TECHNOLOGICALLY UNACHIEVABLE DUE TO THE INHERENT VARIABILITY FOUND IN WOOD INCLUDING CELL STRUCTURE AND AMOUNT OF SAP VERSUS HEARTWOOD. INDUSTRY REMAINS FOCUSED ON CONDUCTING THE NECESSARY RESEARCH TO REDUCE REQUIRED CHEMICAL LEVELS IN THE AWPA STANDARDS CONSISTENT WITH MAINTAINING THE NEEDED PROTECTION PROVIDED BY TREATING. NORTH CEDAR RIVER BRIDGE • WOOD TO BE TREATED BY THE PROVISIONS SPECIFIED BY THE "BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES" (BMP) OF THE WESTERN WOOD PRESERVES INSTITUTE & AMERICAN WOOD -PRESERVERS ASSOCIATION (AWPA) • THE WOOD SHALL BE TREATED BY ACZA -AMMONIACAL COPPER ZINC ARSENATE. • THE TIMBER MATERIAL SHALL BE TREArED WITH ACZA IN COMPLIANCE WITH BMP. • ON SITE INSPECTION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND CONFORMANCE WITH BMP IS REQUIRED. • PRODUCT TREATMENT, REQUIRED PENETRATION, AND REQUIRED RETENTION-(AMOUNT OF-PRESERVATIVE IN THE ASSAY ZONE) PER REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE (AWPA) & THEIR COMMODITY (C) STANDARDS. • USE AMENDMENT GUIDELINES OF APRIL 18, 2002 City of Renton P/anninq Division Nov 2 4 zao9 0, ~ 1 ---,.---------------r----.---,---,--,-------==:::-------,--:::-,::::::::::--,--:::::-r----------------,-------r--:-=:::::::::-:::::--,-----.~,.------,."'"su""'BTITLE=------~-----------------,.,="""""'==--==,----==------l ~ I-SYM RE.VISION BY APPROl'ED DATE ACCEPTABILITY UMn" u",~ CURRENT REVISION sYMBOL A DATE THIS DESIGN AND/OR L lZ-l0-08 G~NERAL NOTES 8860731 09.21.09 ! SYM -f--·--------------t-- Rf.VISION DATE A REPAIR NORTH BRIDGE 8860731 .. ROSS PH M.NAKHJIRI 09.21.09 SPECIFlCATION IS APPROVED DP 1,as""HEET~-----'-----+-------1,,, 1-----~~--rnGlf.lEERr---+---l-=;=--------==~=~==-c=----------1 ~ APPROVED BY DEPT. DATE ~~E TTTLE REPAIR NORTH BRIDGE S5 S-7 ~ ~IQRTH CEDAR RIVER BRIDGE 1-=JoB""No~. -8-860-73-1-----t=coM~P ~=--iP->S-P-RO-J --1~ 1-==~---'-------'-----"----'--"-'-----l RENTON DWG NO. RTN-NBRDG-S5 l----+---------·------t------l----l~--+----l----------------+----1-----1----1 AeP APPRO D STRUCTURAL MASTER '" DO NOT TIPE HERE '*' ' ' u, I -1>-o <D D PERIMETER ROAD { : u, I -i,. -1>- u, I -1>-o (,J c-1 c-2 c-3 AR u, u, u, I u, I 6, ::j;'. I a, o a, (,J u, C-9 C-10 C-11 C-12 C-13 N--C B-1 B-2 B-3 B=----4_8_-_5 ___ ; .--AP-BON-8 ~---nrRE~NTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT ~--APRON-A --------A-1 ----A~ 2 -A-3 -A-4 A-5 5-0 D ] !l J AREA MAP z • ~ :c '/ ;::il (Tl !:'.:] ""'" """" •• 157 181 KING !:!!; --·--lOTMXlllA Pl£R<:E co. PUGET SOUND REGION @ NO SCALE SYM rtE.VISION HY APPROVED DATE A REPAIR NORTH BRIDGE 8860731 J.ANDRE M.NAKHJIRI 09.21.09 A-6 A-7 --A-.::..9---1 0 SYM u, I .--I I --i,. -GJ (.,J a, u, I ~ 0 ~ r;ii-s • ' 0 --l co LOGAN A ENUE ' (Jl I -1>-o -..._J u-r I N -..._J • • BURNETT AVE. N. WILLIAMS AVE. N. z • (.11 -I :c ;::il (Tl !:'.:] I . PLAN VIEW SCALE 1"-300'-0" WELLS AVE. N. PELLY AVE. N. PARK AVE. N. PARKING GARAGE ~ 0 I GARDEN AVENUE N. I REVISION ) -llHI -llHI -llHI z • c t D f\_~ iili ~ 0 I N 0 PARKING GARAGE ' " L__ _ __J=::~ G}ffitiN Av£ 14 /. BY APPRO'IED DATE \1/o, ,' .. , -.; -...... -.~ z • &.i v-'V s _J - ... -¥'" \ ~ ' - -• ~ I ' oo-v ex, (0 • -" -.-- vo-'V I u, N L\-'V iv- I 111 ' --· -.. -- -¥'" \ ti, ----------------..\> ----' --\..--"-----CP --__ .-.->.-r----------(jJ --_, --,-,__,... ------------------ NORTH CEDAR RIVER REPAIR PROJECT LOCATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE PARCEL 1-80 C[TY OF RENTON. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON The following described tract of land is the resultant consolidation of Record Tille vested in the Boeing Company, a Delaware Corporation and Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Massachusetts Corporation, covered in the Pioneer National Title Insurance Company, Limited Liability Reports Number A-253802, A-253803, A-253804, Unit 13, dated January 11, through January 21, 1980. THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1 AND 3 IN SECTION 7; AND OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDAN, IN THE CllY OF RENTON, KING COUNlY, WASHINGTON; AND OF C.H. ADSIT'S LAKE WASHINGTON PLAT AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 8 OF PLATS, PAGE 79, RECORDS OF KING COUNlY, WASHINGTON; AND OF BLOCK C, THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL MAP OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS, AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNlY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 5927582; AND OF CERTAIN SHORE LANDS OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHOWN ON SHEETS 3 AND 4 OF THE MAP PREPARED BY UDO HESSE UNDER KING COUNlY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 156371; AND OF VACATED LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD (FORMERLY PARK STREET); AND OF THE ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. RAILWAY (FORMERLY NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY) RIGHT-OF-WAY. PARCEL 11-80 CITY OF RENTON. KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON The fallowing described tract of land shows record Title vested in The Boeing Compony, a Delaware Corporation, covered in the Pioneer Ncrlionaf Title Insurance Company, Limited Liability Report A-253196, dated January 21, 1980. ALL BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE GRID MERIDAN OF THE WASHINGTON COOORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE. THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER 0 THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN THE CllY OF RENTON, KING COUNlY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL 111-80 CllY OF RENTON. KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON The following described tract of land shows record Title vested in The Boeing Company, a Delaware Corporation, covered in the Pioneer National Title Insurance Company, Limited Liability Report A-253195, dated January 21, 1980. ALL BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE GRID MERIDAN OF THE WASHINGTON COOORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE. THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND OF THE NORTHEAST QUATER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. IN KING COUNlY, WASHINGTON. . PARCEL IV-80 CITY OE RENTON. KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON The following described tract of land shows record Title vested in The Boeing Company, a Delaware Corporation. covered in the Pioneer National Title Insurance Company, Limited Liability Report A-253807, dated January 21, 1980. ALL BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE GRID MERIDAN OF THE WASHINGTON COOORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE. THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTIION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. IN KING COUNlY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT N0.2 RIGHT-OF-WAY AND WESTERLY OF LOGAN STREET NORTH AS DEEDE TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER3261297. NOTE: Parcel bearing description is attached to permit package. City of Renton Plannin~,: Division NO'.' 2 & 1009 ~?,~suiraBTITLEiiii.E ___ S_IT_E_P_L_A_N_&_L_EG_A_L_D_E_S_C_R_IP_T_IO_N ____ 1ecuiiuRiiERENTNTRiR8eim;mi~·7-31"SYMiviiili'eoiLL---:A-rruDAi'i'FJE_0_9-.2-1.-09-~! --t,,___-t---,'-----f--f,;;rrr;;.--l.E-------=RE=P~A=IR~N~OR=T~H~BR=l~DG~E~-----------1sHrn I soa s .. 2 .; i--=.---..,---__::___::_ _____ h=~=-'=------=-------1 ~ JOB NO. COMP NO. ::;; 1-c=~~-8:..:8...C6-'--07_3_1 ___ --'--------~ c5 RENTON owG No. RTN-NBRDG-SOa NORTH CEDAR RIVER BRIDGE STRUCTURAL MASTER ''* DO NOT 1YPE HERE '*' SYM A LAKE WASHINGTON " .. " 2' o" 2a·-o ....\ 10·-012·-01 -_ .. \ ... --,· ~-·--·-· --~-----·-- 14" it ff' ASA Clo• 50 Cost Iron Pipe under lcklll to Bryn A.lowr Sewage Treatment Plant. -----------------------------_________ _,_______ ----....... ----------' ----....... ' \\ ' \ \ \ , __ 1-J/4"C, 3 #10, 440'1 ,---Existing Timbe --·---""~""= --:,-__. --- ------ I \ \ \ \ \ 8 (k'¥f'd \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ -----1 ---'r~- Top of Bank · 20 , NS (J5') \sheet pile depth ( E,o{H DEPTH DEPr.rJ \ \ Outside ~::e~oint . .. __ .\ __ " -- -----~-fr-·------- ---\ \ I \ [xisting Top of Bank -·-~ Timber Bulkhead -··-t Sheet Pile 1 OL1lside Corner Work Pcint Inv. 24.0 -, • ::::--............_ --111-.:;:;y:".:::-: ----------1:l --r-----...._.~ I -~-----------~)...--·=---.:-=-~----"7"-·_:--_::--.,,,.:· -:-·.:_-_-_-4.r"l~-:-_,..---------·i·--· \ \ ~ ----I 1\ \ L ------------· \ 1 1 1 \ ~~------------t-CD-1 1 \ h l \ I .J,......--\ 11\ I 'J?: I \ 2H C, 2-/18 4-BOV ----·-~ \ ii \ Ill \ \ I \\ U) I \ 12" Outfall -• .... I \\ ~ \ I \ \ \I I l./1 \ ,_ - \ l \ '\ \ Q , \ 1 1 \1 I er l 4---· \ ~-~-~-' 1 <f of Pa~:-__ _..-----i \1 \ 1 \ ----------• \ ,I I I ',----·--•. 1 1 11 \ -r:-1 t· 1a tk d ~ 11.,...-----, cxri:, 1ng 11 e , I l\ \ \ I I \ \ \\ \ \ \ I , \ 1i 1 \ I \ \ \\ I \ ~ \ ........ \ I J (25') , I lfl OE:PT/1 \ \l - ~-PAI I \·'2) I 2.. \ ,!J I I \ ' ,~ Below ., r \ \ ' ,._...,. I ' I \ \ I . 3 I --1 -----·------.. ------_______ T __ _ ' \ I \ '.l I \ 4 I \ I \ ' I ,_, ,#, \ ' ,_. ---~-, I ., I I ' I ' l \ '"';.. f • r ~- j C I ::J \ ~ \ \ I I \ \ .,-----0 H WM 1 '< \ ' \ I \ I \ I \ I \ l \ I \ REVISKlN BY DA1£ REPAIR NORTH BRIDGE 8860731 ROSS PN M.NAKHJIRI 11.03.09 SYM \ I \ \ \ \ . \ I l REYISKJN [xisting Hir1ged Stab __ Edge of Pavement \ \ Existing Bulkhead _.........., £.Lt31:L..Yl£_W BY 1),6,1£ IIIIEI.IVG® - 1 I l I I ' I . ~ I' \ ~ \ I \~ II \ I 11 I \ ll \ I \ i II I I /11 \ 1 \ ll E:xi.stiriq 1c•pd gJ10 w --4--\\ -r , '1 I i1 I ') I \ 11 I \\ 1-.. l l \ il \ ;1?. '\ \ JL __ . I \~Cl..--,+-·-'a --1--1 l I '·" I • I VJ t \ t' 1 C: I \ U l't)1 I rt \"' I \I 1 a 1\ \1 \ -, I u 1 ,-,t.. 1 i 11 '11,1 I\! I · I >l l O t n 1 I ~~ l '" I I \\ I v, I \ H \ ~ \ \ \\ 1 I I \1 \ .\ . 11 I I I \\ \ \ \ I \ t \ \ 1 I I \ \ \ ·r ---· --... --- 1 (25') ,......._I, L1EPTH 2 -- E:xisting Hinged Slab ----------------- t,,,,--~ Edge of 1-Jinge Slab -----, -------, --- \ I 1 l ' • • l \ tr.! \ I \ * I ' ---~-I I \ I \ o,.J \ , \ I 1 \ ' \ I \ CD REMOVE EXISTING ROTIED TIMBER CAP. (ESTIMATED AT 12') SEE 1 '----· E'xisting Bulkhead 0 S1 S3 REMOVE BROKEN GROUT PAD AT~--.. PILES B-4, C-4 AND C-5 SEE 2 0 CD S1 S3 REMOVE BROKEN CONDUIT CLIPS, SEE INSTALL TEMPORARY DEBRIS CURTAIN 3 S1 S3 C~ity of Flenton Planninq Division Nov 2 4 zoui :,a !Ft!~(C~ll\)#~(Q) ; ~ ,-----,,n,,---,.:;;=-;,-----------------------,~=~=-~=--~=------l~ ACCEPTAB1Ll1Y THIS DESIGN AND/OR SPECIFICATION IS APPROVED 10. 12.08 SUBTITlE CURRENT RE.VISION SYMBOL A DATE DEMOLITION PLAN r.:t=,..--_88_60_7_31~---+---11_.03_.0_9 _--f§ SHEET ,., TTILE-----------------------1 '· CHECKED NORTH ~;;;~RT~1:1 ;~ BRIDGE 1--=JOB~NO~. -5-1----+=COM~P N~0~~-~4---1~ 8860731 ~ t.=.-....,--------~~-------1 RENTON OWG NO. RTN-NBRDG-S1 APPROVED BY DEPT. DATE DP APPROVE A RO STRUCTURAL MASTER ,,. DO NOT l'fPE HERE "' ·-------·---··------------·------------·--------------------- ---- L -SAN .., -\ PROJECT AREA \ :....---1---+- ClJ N ..-u ti:i I UJ :c ~I LU Cl) z 0 ~ :::::, ~ z I-z 0 u er: 0 LL 30"C -' STS I ------(.) ~ ;;1: - CB 15 TYPE 2-96" RIM 17.98 • --11 BM C-9 PK LNNL El!.!9.16 ~ § ~ i TOP '°' INV PIMld INSTALL GAT p sljlOT N 185596.1 1298910.4 IE 54"1N 7.31 IE 60'0UT 7.39 IE 12" 13.00 1 "C. 0 .t-1,--, C nc TOP 18.24 INV E 10.5 INV S 10.5 9.04 METRO MH ROl-43 RIM 17.78 ~-FL 14.26PRD ~*-'v A MATCH LINE-FOR CONTINUATION SEE SHEET C11C 38.1--=---=-~======--==--==-----i..--==--==----- 0 0 CJ) CJ) w 4-67 ';Q 30 "' ;a unt~OONDED WITH P~ ENT REPIACEMENT en 1993 -CJ) g N ~ 38.2 0.1 CB 17 TYPE 2-96 W VA T C12C C580 RIM 16.0 IE IN 7.00 No. 552B 2 w INV 18 5 MW-102 RIM=18.22 1W=17.93 No. 553 CB-II TOP 18.10 INV NE 12.87 INV S 13.00 BOT 11.3_.,.. I \ BOT ... ~~ I INV W 1 v:.1'._ BOT 8.0 j / ~ "fl ,>\l.D ---::.c'll • INV E 14.25 \ 091 9.40 MH IE OUT 0.0 MW-103 RIM=17.60 1,17.19 No. 554 CB-I TOP 17.5 INV E 13.5 INV W 14.3 INV S 13.4 BOT 12.6 POWER AIR RIM 1 5 0 \ 0 0 ,_ No. 558 CB-I IQ v!8Q,..Q:'. {,<D <:J> 84.5 • 98.5 X 95.4 -- OUTFALL IL -2.96 UTIU1Y COUPLING ----- 98.4 0 CB 95.4 OF-021 17.1 B L.:,,,..L.-' 348 -a~\ ---------.... ~ " ~ B'C No. 557 STS .. -Q---"cB""'-..1..I --TOP 16.8 INV 13.8 BOT 10.1 No. 559 RIM 18.43 INV W 12.03 \ 0 \ Be; ~ X 95.6 o CB 95.4 MW-104 RIM=17.02 1W=16.68 98 6 98.6 x,- 95.8 ---- '.\\J\\ s0-\\c, ~~ " ' " ,, ' V"'f-S \/ -,, I 1..--1 " DRAIN HOL~ \\ WMH-G ' \ RIM 17.3 \ WV FLUSH HYO A-503 SEC 13A \ \ \ \ \ \ 500 \ \ \ W ASPHALT \ \ \ COVERED HOl£ TO LAKE TOP 16.6 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I -' I u < ;;1: A C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 C21 C22 C23 C24 GENERAL NOTES: VERIFY ALL EXISTNG CONDmONS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO START OF CON5'TRUCTION. NOTIFY PROJECT ARCHITECT Of Afff DISCREPANIES THAT ARE FOUND FOR CLARIFICATION. ANY PROPOSED CHANGES SHALL HAVE PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ARCHITECT. [D INSTALL CONCRETE FOOTING WITH EMBEDDED TRACKS FOR GATE PER DETAILS A AND A C12C C576 C12C C578 CONSTRUCTION NOTES: KEY PLAN SCALE : NONE B C OEFGHJKL ----s --......-. 1"C-5#10, #10 G D D3-19a, 21 b, 23c, 25a \ \ C25 / / \ // ~\ // / / _/ CB DATABASE BY DHA DEC. 1994; RESCALED FEB. 1996 SYM REVISION BY APPROVED DATE UPDATED U/G UTILllY MAPPING DHA, INC JGC DAH 12.31.97 UPDATED U/G UTIU1Y MAPPING DHA, INC SDP DAH 5.4.98 A VALVE NO. UPDATE HGI DED 8.5.96 UPDATE APRON SEAMS -DHA, INC DHA, INC MJM DAH 8.7.98 UPDATE OUTFALL INTERCEPTOR MAPPING KCM, INC JLF JWL 8.30.99 IM 8. 2 NV 1 .12 INV E 14.52 --~ "' ,~ --\ -- SYM Rf.VISION on ... !NV S 11.82 !NV . ------:! NW 13.40 INV N 15.02 BOT 10.9 W VAULT RELIEF VALVE NO. 2-6" TOP 18.7 IQ • ~ 0 MW ~· • ..> j ~~ ~ 82.6 71.2 • 71.1 1-'r ---- MATCH LINE-FOR CONTINUATION SEE SHEET C13C BY APPROVED DATE DHA. INC AMG DAH 10.7.99 UPDATE U/G UTIUlY MAPPING ---------t----+----+---1 B INFR -AMS GATE INSTALL O 0-40 140694-04 PJG C RETROITT GATE D-40 (D-41) lRANSP 567667-00 BTW TMH 7.18.07 D PS BUILT DWGS -RECORD -TRANSPO 567667-00 AMS TMH 3.7.08 E REPAIR NORTH BRIDGE 8660731 JA/MN M.NAKHJIRI 09.21.09 rs_±, \ 1 441 s . X 94.7 98.1 X 97.1 96.6 X 99.9 \ \ MW-106 RIM=18.11 1W=17.74 \ '- , 1 'i C26 C27 C28 C29 C30 2--..r· SCALE IN FEIT City of Renton Plar,ninq Oi';ision NOi/ 2 , 1l1D1 l ~ :a ---TDA'~-Toosu"'BTITLE;;;;-;,---------------------"Tc=u=RR=~""""'~R==•s1o=N-,..,==·oo=L-[--,-,o=•=~-------l~ ACCEPTABILITY =· "" a,m n,c "' THIS DESIGN AND/OR PARTIAL SITE TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN 8860731 09.21.09 8 SPECIFICATION IS APPROVED w---i-----11cm,~-------=-=='::' :-:-:==::-:-===-=c------------l"s"'HEET=-----'-----!-------l:--"'; APPROVED BY DEPT. DATE TITlE REPAIR NORTH BRIDGE C 12C C 2 ~ ~~~CH~~E~~ -~ RENTON SITE ~Jo~s N~o_------~co=~p~No~. -----j i,i 8860731 Y&P>S PLANS>20 ~ OVED CIVIL MASTER RENTON, WA DWG NO. RTN-YD-C12C DHA JOB No.730.00 -- ~ ~ u 1- [±j I :r: en lH I en z 0 ~ :::> z 1-z 0 u 0:: f2 I ' s. s. \ RGmp \ \ o- LO N co CJ) N w 0 LO N CD 0) N w Os. -- Wooden s.O -- -----------... ----------------i ---~----;... _ _,, ---- --- -----18.8 ---1 --~---*18.5 L--JU......----'~ SYM R8/ISION BY APPRO'IED 1),11£ SYM A REPAIR NORTH BRIDGE 8860731 JA/MN M.NAKHJIRI 09.21.09 -- - \ O 0 \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ I\ I\ \ \ \\;vii \\ \ \ \\S2\\ \\ \ \ \\6 \\ I\ I \ \\Z\\ \\ \ I \\ s\\ -II \ \ \\ ~ \\ \ \\Q\\ \\ \ I 11-;;11 II \ \Ir\\ \\ I \ \\ 2:::: \\ \\ \ \ \\~\\ \\ \ I \\~\\ \\ \ \\ \\ \I \ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \ L-_JL_JL..JL-1 0 19.9 Dirt I o- 0 LO co CJ) N w 0 0 LO CD 0) N w *'·5 19.4 *19.4 I-r,,-,,, \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \I \\ \\ I \ 1\ \\ I\ I \ \ \\ \\ \ \ I \\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ I \\ \\ -\__. \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \I \\ \\ \ \ \\ \I \\ \ I \I \\ \\ \ \ ' ' \ I \\ \\ \\ I ~ \ \\ \\ \\ \ fill \\ \\ \I I ~ L_JL_lL_JL..J ~ ~ \~ ,-, n _J \ \ \, I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ -- Cone ------------------ I I I I Romp I CB-1-1.3' TOP 17.9 INV NE 16.6 BOT 15.3 I I ,_,_ / 19.5 I I \ Grass I \ I I / -- \ L-l I \ \ \ _,__ __ L ::::, l I I _ _ _ _ \ \ MATCH LINE -FOR CONTINUATION SEE SHEET C13B REVISION BY APPRO'IED 1),11£ -------• PROJECT AREA ---- I . w 0 LO !"- CD 0) N w -----~--I:""-----------------,,,, ---- • ACCEPTABI Lin' DTE 2.23.96 THIS DESIGN AND/OR SPECIFICATION IS APPROVED APPROVED BY DEPT. DATE D SUBTITlE TITLE CIVIL MASTER 0 u N ~ u I- I lH :r: en I lH en z 0 ~ :::> z 1-z 0 Le-e---~:-::::r:1nn~8 ~ ' ~13 . :r: • ~:=;:::;;:;;g ~ • :::1: PARTIAL Sl"iE TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN REPAIR NORTH BRIDGE ' ' RENTON SITE RENTON, WA KEY PLAN SCALE : NONE C10E C10f C10G CURRENT RE'l1SION DATE A 8860731 09.21.09 ! SHEET "' C12B C-1 ' a, 0 "' ~ JOB NO. co"y NO. ~ 8860731 &P>S PLAN>20 :s "' DWG NO. RTN-YD-C128-C128 SYM A ---~~ D !l AREA MAP •• k 167 KOO 181 18 (J1 I .i,,. 0 co D PERIMETER ROAD --:,.......-B-5 B-1 B-2 B-38 =---4~~~~~--; ~AP-RON-B (J1 I 0 N 5-0 • I ALWRN I 5-50 ~~ z • ~ I ;;u fT1 ~ A-6 A-7 WILLIAMS AVE. N. z • WELLS AVE. N. PELLY AVE. N. PARK AVE. N . ALOON,\ ,r I GARDEN AVENUE N. ) ---------. IOOGCO. --TOTAOOIII Pt.kCE co. @ PUGET SOUND REGION NO SCAl£ PLAN VIEW SCALE 1 " -300' -0" REVISICN BY APPROVED DATE SYM REVISIOII REPAIR NORTH BRIDGE 8860731 J.ANDF!E M.NAKHJIRI 09.21.09 ' ' = ~-R . ?-'<;· BY APPRO\'ED (J1 (J1 (J1 I (J1 I ~ (J1 I I (J) .i,,. I (J) 0 (J1 .i,,. O'> (;.I (J1 I 0 .i,,. (;.I .i,,. J...,,--,.8 c-9 c-1 Ou ,c~1~1 c:._-~':::_ 2c_1_3 ____ 1 C-4 C-5 C-6 CAP C N-C - z • ~ I ~ ;;u fT1 ~ DATE \ APP LEGEND: NORTH CEDAR RIVER REPAIR PROJECT LOCATION -.. ---------------' - BOEING OWNED PROPERlY RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 City of Renton Planninq Division NOV 2 4 1009 8 "' - ~SlimiiiT-------------raOilRENfREVisioir-""Ts'iMBiir----:;-~---j.; SUBTITLE soE1NG owNEo PROPERTY s1TE MAP CURRENT Rra60731 SYMBOL A DATE 09.21.09 ~- i-==----'-----+-------100 SHEET ~ .....--+r---1--i'-1---t-cam=L·~E ------R~E~PA~IR-NO~R=TH-s=R1=0G=E----------t so s 3 d ~__:___::__:_c_--+==-,=------'---a --l i NORTH CEDAR RIVER BRIDGE JOB NO. 8860731 COMP NO. ~ '-==~-__::_-::_:_::.:~---'--------j RENTON DWG NO. STRUCTURAL MASTER RTN-NBRDG-SOc -DO NOT 1YPE HERE - ------- ------·--·------------·· ·-· ---------- SYM REVlSION BY APPRO'vED DATE SYM REV1SION BY APPRO'vED DATE A REPAIR NORTH BRIDGE 8860731 J.ANDHE M.NAKHJIRI 11.03.09 .IIIIEI.ND® CODE SUMMAFiY DESCRIPTION OF WORK: REPAIR OF DESIGNATED PILE CAPS, GROUT PADS.AND UTILITIES ATTACHMENTS TO NORTH. CEDAR BRIDGE CONTRACTOR: __________________ _ BOEING PROJECT ENGINEER: MEHDI NAKHJIRI PHONE 425-941-2606 PHONE 206-617-2944 BOEING CONT ACT:. ____ =MA--'RK--'--'CL=EM=E:..ccNT __ _ APPLICATIONS/PERMITS RELATED TO ·· 201\/ING: BUILDING CODE: BARRIER FREE REQUIREMENTS OCQUPANCY GROUP:(SEC. ) ' CO~STRUCTION TYPE:(SEC. ) ALLOWABLE AREA INCREASE: FLOOR AREA:(ACTUAL) BUILDING HEIGHT:(ACTUAL) (TABLE 5-D) STORIES: OCCUPANT LOAD:(ALLOWABLE) (TABLE 33-A) OFFICES 1 /1 OOSF MECH/STOR 1/300SF CONFERENCE 1/15SF CLASSROOM 1 20SF MANUFACTURING 1 200SF ALL OTHER 1 1 OOSF FIRE PROTECTION: SEPARATION EXT. WALL iON-BEARING) EXT. WALL BEARING) INT. WALL ( ON-BEARING) INT. WALL (BEARING) STRUCTURAL FRAME FLOORS/CEILINGS ROOF CONSTRUCTION SEISMIC DESIGN: DESIGN LOADS:(CHAPTER 23) ROOF: SNOW LIVE FLOOR: OFFICE MECH/STOR STAIRS CONCENTRATED: MFR LIGHT MFR HEAVY OFFICE WIND: EXPOSURE PROJECT: COE, SHORELINES, BLDG. PERMIT, 1-IPA, WATER QUALITY, CZM. HEAVY IND./POBLIC USE 2006 UBC N/A N/A N/A N/A BLDG FOOTPRI NTJ_ _____ N,.,,.,/A'---_ BLDG GROSSc___~NN/r.AA __ FIRST FLOOR ___ :c,z.~-- SECOND FLO,,.,Ou.R _-"N'+/A,____ REMODEL AR, ..... EAo.__:.:.iN/c.:..:A __ N/A N/A BASEMENT N/A FIRST FLOOR __ ___,..,.N/=A __ SECOND FLOO'<.IR.,____'d-N/r.A __ THIRD FLOOR __ ~N/::!:1-=c....c.....:; -----------· REMODEL AR EAa.._-"'N'L.!../A,...__ N/A N/A N/A N N/A N/A N/A N/A 25PSF 20PSF N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 90 MPH BAP D NOTE: SPECIAL CONDITIONS MAY EXIST IN FACTORY AREAS. VERIFY LOADING WITH FACILITIES PLANT ENGINEER PRIOR TO DESIGN. WING INDEX STRUCTURAL SEO# S-1 S-2 S-3 S-3a S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 CIVIL SEO# C-1 C-2 DWG# so SOa SOb soc S1 S2 S3 S5 DWG# C12B C12C REV. A A A A A A A A REV. A E TITLE CODE SUMMARY & DRAWING INDEX SITE PLAN & LEGAL DESCRIPTION COLORED SITE MAP BOEING OWNED PROPERT SITE MAP DEMOLITION PLAN PROJECT PLAN DETAILS GENERAL NOTES TITLE PARTIAL SITE TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN PARTIAL SITE TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN 1s:,1ty of Renton P\anninq Division NOV 2 4 1!U9 is: ~ I:;; ----,= ~--.-:::,-=-;=----------=-==-=--==:-----------==,=-,,=~--==~---r.,=-------l :::! ACCEPTABILITY SUBTITl£ COVER SHEET CURRENT REVISION SYMBOL A DATE a, THIS DESIGN AND/OR -,----t----+.~---_y'--'Q,[2:~_§..=:~.::~~13_y_~~8A_:I/J~G.~=~--____j~=--88_6_07_3_.1 ___ ---t--1-1_.0_3._09 __ J SPECIFICATION IS APPROVED = u D IN IN DEX 'sHEET • ..:. APPROVED BY DEPT. DATE M.NAKHJIRI 09.21.09 TITLE REPAIR NORTH BRIDGE so s 1 ::: CHECK • 00 1-s=~--------+=~~----1~ NORTH CE:DAR RIVER BRIDGE JOB NO. 8860731 COMP NO. :5 ~-_ __::_::_:._:___;.__;. ___ _,__ _____ --1 C!) RENTON DWG NO. STRUCTURAL MASTER RTN-NBRDG-SO **• 00 NOT 1YPE HERE *"