Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 1PARTIES OF RECORD HUE ACCESSORY DWELLING LUA10-036, CU -A Han Phan, P.E. PBG, LLC 5130 S 166th Lane Seatac, WA 98188 tel: (206) 229-6422 eml: han@theconceptgrp.com (contact) Hue T. Huynh 11410 SE 176th Street Renton, WA 98055 tel; (206) 779-9457 (owner / applicant) Updated: 05/27/10 (Page 1 of 1) 1W� TICOR TITLE COMPANY 600 SW 39th Street, Ste 100, Renton, WA 98057 (425)255-7575 FAX (425)255-0285 TL Investment Group 5041 Renton Ave 5 Seattle, WA 98118 Attn: Kelsey RE: Title No.: 6453701-1 Customer Reference: Huynh/ GOING GREEN pity of Renton Piaivl-""g ()Mslon MAY As part of Ticor Title Company's commitment to the environment, we encourage the paperless distribution of our products whenever possible. To help conserve natural resources, we will automatically issue the forthcoming original policy(ies) electronically. Please provide us with a current e-mail address for the new owner and/or lender prior to closing or by emailing WAPolicy@ticortitle.com. Hard copy versions may be issued upon request. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to provide you with our services_ cc: TL Investment Group Kelsey LI -r I,au, b 1-1 �I se .II1111-1111A— I N a - 0iO L bN 6-,—% I I u —:, - 9icL Yi icn ' U BOY Z) 0 C) u 2 Z W Lo J CD LU m Z UU1 Q 3: CL m =� c LLJSLu Q T a x Z x o LU a ao� p I I I I I I I^ I I I o� I I ^2 ea W 3 � I ! +^.a •fid fI I 1WC Mtl Air ~iY � � II LI -r I,au, b 1-1 �I se .II1111-1111A— I N a - 0iO L bN 6-,—% I I u —:, - 9icL Yi icn I� !I E �9a0■§o®IYt Q®9� � TI �� I n 3S 3%V H"D k ��` Ae1CR �P£yY.lq� m .iCe seems N tnav ukaC, as AV RMI •aul 'OulddvN V AasaR$ ailsFuu4 Boa •�3 saoee yM HUM d e as awK4 mans OiHdvaDoda.1 WA $9 `axa 'M8 dU 'BZ M WT SS 'i/i SS L'�x,xn cL I� !I E �9a0■§o®IYt Q®9� � TI �� I n 3S 3%V H"D k ��` Ae1CR �P£yY.lq� m .iCe seems N tnav ukaC, as AV RMI � e L'�x,xn cL i�f5t. � 41y13 spppipsC Oder I w � w Y • M w i..BE 4 —W 6 soon I� !I E �9a0■§o®IYt Q®9� � TI �� I n 3S 3%V H"D k ��` Ae1CR �P£yY.lq� m .iCe seems N tnav ukaC, as AV RMI � e 41y13 spppipsC Oder I w � w Y • M w e� w M;Z= =. Q1.•= .sj0aU!5U3 )g SA!.4 40 p110M. U111009 MzH101slu , 1 1 d jS [ mill ���_� e ti 111t 11.EB1111.1111 a it lilt, 1111PIX1111`B1101 � ssos6 vm `so,r.1�a cx0a A}ISL4102iI d 3 0141 I d H X0I11clav GNV 73QOG as myrmi 47. C .0 LI I 11 the 11141, R d 3 ili9 �lo! gq-Y 785 � iiFEk 3�fEge $ z SRol r 4111H. fill, Re, el M I HUI ON14 M io,Qj 111I Mill N 001141 a � ��r1g2142444 A i i i "' $$x22222 RR s A� I �j R Q 4 It hy i Itkg # eam h 1 1111 ° oil 0,1 I�'I se � a7 411 4111 $k � tili €7 �9 .4 1 9�# $.i ! i . i 0 #°ea �11 �ee ; � ,; lop 1._�� � � .. M ��gH11111IM11 2 M, ¢��� IIs fits 1n i sY k �E43 ii�� 10 MH Ip �j�ae a�p�i 9gs ¢fie10€ ui ilk a � a lop 1._�� � � .. M ��gH11111IM11 2 M, ¢��� IIs fits 1n i sY k �E43 ii�� 10 MH Ip �j�ae a�p�i 9gs ¢fie10€ TIAOSjaou[6u� -V H SU61SDCI Ic PROM* IHINIMSH 3SOB6 VA1 10 Op 3MUMIA'O'JI'FEd 3 otll� em NOIII([([V GNV laGOIN2N 6 0 Qi z 0 0 010 Z_ Z� .7, N .7 Z IL Z u!: C V) :3 F3 LL T g: p vi 2 z w VF 10 Z, �.2 'Ei o oz Z., z z Z V) z Jaz0 < < 2 (L WO M L) z z z w DO J Z o� ZTM < w= So Z F) m W W < III l o V) z Z > Z 0 V, 02 zz �:y W 'o VOapo z w oft� o Ua Z \ \ {\ . / )p , / } m j'`(Moo B miss@sm % � m¥a'INE: ■ # §m£GGV O§Y 13COMN. z�> 2 � ^ Z�� ; / I o=.g UTIaOug rdimusaa �' 9nEbt9-i SME -: awa 9919�'i t i3pN@ � 2�ii Iq� a F 2$� §F= aka ''J _.s� ' �ggR i`� 2. fi _ A z c _ fl 8191 Ot331Bri 01 y o- 4 G] U S"s 486 dffi 'NO,:,\32i OQ CIVCH WIAICUM 30-,011 ga NOIZIQQd GNV IRQOMIS t'7 e � y Lg a i3pN@ � 2�ii Iq� a F 2$� §F= aka ''J _.s� ' �ggR i`� 2. fi _ A z c _ fl O 4 G] U C S V r ZEE Z Oy n 0 - 1 W U 0 : eiPi a i3pN@ � 2�ii Iq� a 2$� §F= aka ''J _.s� ' �ggR i`� 2. fi _ A z c _ fl 4 G] U C W � U � zw wz U � D� W zz 00 �O D Z O uj Z F Z 4Z � O W O K wU ❑ n� Ln Z� W <O � Lv W J m ON W aZ Z 4 Wa a a Ow � U� O Om 4 r � O � ZO W QZ J �J Z J 2 O 2= � 4y M Zw p OZ = W W 4 C Y m J� J Jp J 43 � �z z W U O W i Z 0 W < Q z Or : F O J O c5U4 j�r a o z_ N O [Y O oa Z Ut . W � •� (L" i (I jl W � U � zw wz U � D� W zz 00 �O D Z O uj Z F Z 4Z � O W O K wU ❑ n� Ln Z� W <O � Lv W J m ON W aZ Z 4 Wa a a Ow � U� O Om 4 r � O � ZO W QZ J �J Z J 2 O 2= � 4y M Zw p OZ = W W 4 C Y m J� J Jp J 43 � �z z W U O W i Z 0 W < Q z Or : F O J O c5U4 j�r a o z_ N O [Y O oa Z Ut . CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: January 13, 2011 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: Hue Huynh Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) LUA (file) Number: LUA-10-036, CU-A Cross-References: F AKA's: Project Manager: Gerald Wasser Acceptance Date: May 28, 2010 Applicant: Hue T. Huynh I Owner: Same as applicant Contact: Han Phan, PE - PBG, LLC PID Number: 2923059025 ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: October 25, 2010 Appeal Period Ends: November 8, 2010 1 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: Application requesting approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit in association with a single -family residence on a 38,138 square foot lot in the Residential - 14 dwelling units per acre zone. Location: 11410 SE Petrovitsky Road Comments: City of Renton REPORT Department of Community & Economic Development ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REPORT & DECISION DECISION LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: October 20, 2010 Project Name: Hue Huynh ADU CONCURR DATE Owners: Hue T. Huynh NAIrE WOMADATE 11410 SE Petrovitsky Road Renton, WA 98055 ' Contact: Han Phan, PE 0 la � 10 PBG, LLC 5730 5 166th La ne 1� Seatac, WA 98188 File Number. LUA10-036, CU -A Project Manager: Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit {ADU} in association with a single-family residence on a 38,138 square foot lot in the Residential - 14 dwelling units per acre zone. The proposed ADU would be in a converted garage structure. The ADU would have a floor area of 800 square feet, would have an attached 300 square foot covered patio, and attached decks totaling 384 square feet. The site slopes gently downward from south to north. The proposed project is Categorically Exempt from SEPA regulations_ Access to the proposed project would be from an existing driveway on SE Petrovitsky Road. Project location: 11410 SE Petrovitsky Road Administrative CUP, LUAIO-036 Project Location Map 0 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY City of', AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT` j ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REPORT & DECISION A. SUMMARYAND PURPOSE OF REQUEST REPORT DA TE: October 25, 2010 Project !Name: Hue Huynh ADU Owner: Hue T. Huynh 11410 SE Petrovitsky Road Renton, WA 98055 Contact: Han Phan, PE PBG, LLC 5730 5 166th Lane Seatac, WA 98188 File Number: LUA10-036, CU -A Project Manager: Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner Project Summary: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) in association with a single- family residence on a 38,138 square foot lot in the Residential - 14 dwelling units per acre zone. The proposed ADU would be in a converted garage structure. The ADU would have a floor area of 800 square feet, would have an attached 300 square foot covered patio, and attached decks totaling 384 square feet. The site slopes gently downward from south to north. The proposed project is Categorically Exempt from SEPA regulations. Access to the proposed project would be from an existing driveway on SE Petrovitsky Road. Project Location: 11410 SE Petrovitsky Road Project Location Map Hue ADU CUP. doc City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Conditional Use Permit Report & Decision _NUFNUYNHADU LUA10-036, CU -A Report of October 25, 2010 Page 2 of 9 B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: The project site is a 38,138 square foot (0.88 acre) parcel in the Residential - 14 dwelling units per acre (R-14) zone. The site is currently developed with a single family residence and a detached accessory structure, part of which was formerly used as a garage. The property slopes gently downward from south to north. The existing house is located at street level. The existing accessory structure is located at the end of a driveway to the west of the residence. On March 10, 2010 a pre -application meeting was conducted for the subject property. At that time the applicant requested a review for converting an existing garage into an accessory dwelling unit and a religious institution. A field investigation revealed that the garage had already undergone conversion and was being used as a religious institution (a Buddhist Temple) and a dwelling for the Temple's monk. It was indicated to the applicant if the single-family dwelling is the primary use requested, the existing single-family dwelling and the dwelling in the converted garage must be clearly appurtenant to the religious institution and could be used for housing of temple religious leaders. The applicant was also informed that should the single-family use be the primary use, the religious institution use would not be permitted on the site and the dwelling unit in the converted garage could be considered as an accessory dwelling unit if appropriate development and design requirements are satisfied. Subsequently, the applicant redesigned the project and on May 20, 2010, submitted an application requesting approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for an accessory dwelling. The materials submitted with the application indicate that there would be no religious institution on the site at project completion. The applicant currently states that the proposed project would include a detached, 800 square foot accessory dwelling unit with an attached 300 square foot covered patio and two outdoor decks (totaling 384 square feet). Because of discrepancies in the applicant's floor area calculations staff requested that the applicant provide revised floor plans which indicate that the project complies with Code requirements for accessory dwelling units and on July 12, 2010 such revisions were submitted. A review of the revised plans revealed that the floor area calculations were still inaccurate. Staff, again, requested that the applicant provide revised floor plans which show compliance with the Code requirements for accessory dwelling units. The applicant submitted such plans. Staff review of these plans indicate that the calculations for the accessory dwelling unit are based on the measurements from internal walls and the accessory dwelling unit now complies with the 800 square foot maximum. Access to the property would remain from a private driveway which takes access from SE Petrovitsky Road. C. EXHIBITS: The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit 1: Project file ("yellow file") containing application, proof of posting and publication, and other documentation pertinent to this request. Hue ADU CUP. doc City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Conditional Use Permit Report & Decision HUE HUYNH AD_U_ LUA10-036, CU -A Report of October 25, 2010 Page 3 of 9 Exhibit 2: Site Plan Exhibit 3: Existing Garage Floor Plan and Proposed Floor Plan Exhibit 4: Elevations Exhibit 5: Zoning Map Exhibit 6: Aerial Photograph D. FINDINGS: Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now makes and enters the following: 1. Location: The subject site is located at 11410 SE Petrovitsky Road. 2. Governing Code: The regulations for accessory dwelling units are covered under RMC 4-2- 110B and RMC 4-2-115, 3. Conditional Use: The analysis of the proposal according to conditional use permit criteria is found in the body of the staff report. 4. Request. The applicant has requested approval for an administrative conditional use permit for an accessory dwelling unit in the R-14 zone (RMC 4-2-060D). 5. Previous Use of Project Site: The site has previously been used as a religious institution. The applicant has indicated that this use has ceased. 6. Administrative Conditional Use Permit: The applicant's administrative conditional use permit submittal materials comply with the requirements necessary to process a conditional use permit for an accessory dwelling if all conditions of approval are complied with. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are provided as Exhibits 2 through 6. 7. Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: a. North —vacant (R-14 zoning); b. South --SE Petrovitsky Road and single-family residences (R -S zoning); c. East — vacant and single-family residences (R-14 zoning); d. West — multi -family residences (R-14 zoning). S. Zoning: The site is located in the Residential —14 dwelling units per acre (R-14) zone. 9. Topography: The site slopes gently downward to the north. E. CONSISTENCY WITH CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA: RMC 4-9-03OG lists 11 criteria that the Reviewing Official is asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on an Administrative Conditional Use Permit application. The 11 criteria are: Hue ADU CUP.doc City of Renton Deportment of Community & Economic Development Administrotive Conditional Use Permit Report & Decision HUE _N_UYNNADU tUAID-035, CU -A Report of October 25, 2010 Page 4 of 9 1. The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning regulations and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. The R-14 zone, in which the proposed use is located, implements the Residential Medium Density (RMD) Land Use Designation of the Comprehensive Plan. RMD neighborhoods may include a variety of unit types designed to incorporate features from both single-family and multi -family and support cost-efficient housing. Accessory dwelling units are allowed in the R- 14 zone with an approved Administrative Conditional Use Permit. The proposed use would be compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulations. The proposed project meets the purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Residential Medium Density Land Use Designation which is intended to create the opportunity for neighborhoods that offer a variety of lot sizes, housing, and ownership options. RMC 4-2-080A.7 requires that the property owner shall file an affidavit affirming that the owner will occupy the principal dwelling or the ADU. Further, this section of the Code requires that prior to the issuance of building permits; the owner shall record a notice on the property title. The notice shall bear the notarized signature of all property owners listed on the property title and include the legal description of the property, a copy of the approved site/floor plan, and the applicability of the restrictions regarding ADUs in RMC Title IV. If all conditions of approval are met, the project will be in conformance of zoning regulations. 2. The proposed use constitutes a community need for the proposed location. Community need factors include, among all other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over -concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed accessory dwelling unit is the first project of its type to be processed in the City of Renton. The Code allows for 50 accessory dwelling units to be permitted per year. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in an over -concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. b. That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. The project site is a 38,138 square foot lot in the R-14 zone. A detached single-family house (to remain) currently is located on the subject property. In the R-14 zone one detached dwelling with one accessory dwelling unit are allowed on each legal lot. The proposed ADU would be located along the west side property line and behind (north) the existing dwelling. Because of the size of the subject property the proposed location is appropriate for the proposed ADU. 3. The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: a. Lot coverage in residential districts (SF and MF) shall not exceed 5016 of the lot coverage in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located, except for detached accessory dwelling units, which shall not be counted toward lot coverage Hue ADU CUP.doc City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Conditional Use Permit Report & Decision HUEHUYNHADU LUA.10-036, CU -A Report of October 25, 2010 Page 5 of 9 calculations. Lot coverage in all other zones shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The current lot coverage is less than 50% of the 33,138 square foot lot. The 800 square foot accessory dwelling unit would not be counted toward lot coverage calculations. b. Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. The proposed ADU would occupy an existing structure on the subject site and would conform to the development standards of the R-14 zone. The side yard setback for accessory dwelling units in the R-14 zone is 4 -feet and rear yard setback is determined through administrative review. The proposed ADU would be within an existing structure which is 5 -feet from the west side property line, approximately 135 -feet from the east side property line and approximately 85 -feet from the rear property line. The front yard setback in the R-14 zone is 8 -feet and the proposed ADU is over 90 -feet from the front property line. Therefore, the proposed project conforms to the R-14 side yard requirements. C. Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, belltowers, public utility antennas or similar structures may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding uses in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views. The maximum height for ADUs in the R-14 zone is 30 -feet. The proposed ADU structure would be approximately 8 -feet tall and is in conformance with the height restrictions of the R-14 zone and would be compatible with the residential character of the surrounding neighborhood. 4. The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. The proposed ADU is located on a large lot in the R-14 zone in association with an existing single-family house. The existing structure where the ADU would be located has a roof pitch of 4:12. The primary dwelling on the project site is faced with brick. Using similar brick facing as a wainscot on the south fagade of the ADU would make this structure more compatible with the primary dwelling and, therefore, more compatible with the residential scale and character of the surrounding neighborhood. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant shall submit revised elevations which indicate that brick similar to that on the primary dwelling be used as a wainscot on the south fagade of the ADU. The revised elevations shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Planning Division Project Manager prior to the issuance of building permits. S. Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as 75% of the lot coverage requirement of the zone in which the proposed use is located if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. Hue ADU CUP.doc City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Conditional Use Permit Report & Decision NUE HIJYNH ADU LUA10-036, CU -A Report of October 25, 2010 Page 6 of 9 The proposed ADU and the existing single-family house would be the only structures on the project site. There is adequate area for the off-street parking of two vehicles on the subject property and additional lot coverage is not required for the proposed project. 6. Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in, the surrounding area. A pedestrian sidewalk is located along the SE Petrovitsky Road frontage of the subject property. Vehicular access to the site is currently taken from a driveway on SE Petrovitsky Road. Pedestrian and vehicular access to the proposed project site will not change as a result of the proposed project. No significant changes to traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area are anticipated. 7. Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. The proposed ADU would be oriented toward the east and facing toward the interior of the project site. Windows on the west facade of the ADU would be limited in number. Any potential glare would be limited to afternoon hours when the sun is setting. Noise which is typical of residential uses would be associated with the proposed project; the accessory dwelling unit is not anticipated to produce noise volumes which would impact the surrounding neighborhood. 8. Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings or paving. Additional landscaping may be required to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The proposed accessory dwelling unit is oriented toward the interior of the 38,138 square foot lot. Existing landscaping exists along the SE Petrovitsky Road frontage and along an existing north/south oriented driveway. An existing 18 -inch multi -trunk cedar tree and an 18 -inch multi -trunk maple tree are located adjacent to the proposed ADU along the east side of the structure and adjacent to the outdoor decks associated with the structure. A 10 -inch apple tree, a 16 -inch and 18 -inch cottonwood trees are also located on the project site. Because of the large lot size it may be impractical to landscape the entire lot. However, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant submit a landscape plan to the Planning Division Project Manager for review and approval indicating the planting of shrubs, flowering plants and additional groundcover in the area of the lot around the ADU to provide seasonal aesthetic interest prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. Hue ADU CUP. doc City of Renton Deportment of Community & Economic Development Administrative Conditiono! Use Permit Report & Decision HUE HUYNH ADU LUA10-036, CU -A Report of October 25, 2010 Page 7 of 9 The proposed use is an accessory dwelling unit which is allowed in the R-14 zone with an approved Administrative Conditional Use Permit. The proposed ADU would be in compliance with the Renton Municipal Code if all conditions of approval are complied with. 10. No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of Chapter 9 of Title IV of the Renton Municipal Code. The proposed ADU would be located within an existing structure. Compliance with Chapter 9 of Title IV of the Renton Municipal Code would be achieved if all conditions of approval are satisfied. 11. The proposed use and location shall be served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditioned upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities and/or services. Police and Fire Department staff indicates that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed project, subject to the applicant providing Code required improvements. Any students generated by the proposed ADU would be accommodated at Renton School District's Cascade Elementary School, Nelsen Middle School, and Lindbergh High School. The Renton School District Impact Fee for each new accessory dwelling unit is $1,258.00 and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. The Soos Creek Water and Sewer District would provide water and sanitary sewer service. Certificates of water and sewer availability were issued by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District on April 27, 2010. F. CONCLUSION: 1. The Administrative Conditional Use Permit would allow the utilization of an existing structure as an accessory dwelling unit with a floor area of 800 square feet. The ADU is within a former garage structure. The location of the ADU on the project site is indicated in Exhibit 2 (Site Plan). 2. The proposed Administrative Conditional Use Permit for an accessory dwelling unit meets the eleven criteria to be considered in making a decision on a conditional use permit request as specified in RMC 4-9-03OG if all conditions of approval are met. 3. The Administrative Conditional Use Permit complies with the Zoning Code (RMC 4-2-110B and RMC 4-2-115) and the objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The proposed Administrative Conditional Use Permit would allow an accessory dwelling unit on the subject property. The prior use of the property as a religious institution has ceased and the Administrative Conditional Use Permit does not give approval for the operation of a religious institution on the project site. 5. Staff recommends approval with conditions based on the analysis contained in the staff report. Hue ADU CUP. doc City of Renton Department of Communi =conomic Devefopment Administrati Tditionof Ose Permit Report & Decision NUE HUYNHADU LUA10-036, CU -A Report of October 25, 2010 Page 8 of 9 G. DECISION: The Administrative Variance(s) for the Hue Huynh Accessory Dwelling Unit, File No. LUA10-036, CU -A is approved and is subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall submit a landscape plan for the review and approval of the Planning Division Project Manager which indicates the planting of shrubs, flowering plants and groundcover in the area of the lot around the accessory dwelling unit to provide seasonal aesthetic interest prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall submit revised elevations which indicate that brick similar to that on the primary dwelling is used as a wainscot on the south facade of the ADU. The revised elevations shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Planning Division Project Manager prior to the issuance of building permits. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURE: _ z C.F. "Chip" Vincent, Planning Director Date TRANSMITTED this 25th day of October, 2610 to the Owner/Applicant/Contact: Hue T. Huynh Han Phan, P.E. 11410 SE Petro vitsky Road PSG, LLC Renton, WA 98055 5130S.166 th Lane Seatac, WA 98188 TRANSMITTED this 25th day of October, 2010 to the Party(ies) of Record: None TRANSMITTED this 25th day of October, 2010 to the following: Neil Watts, Development Services Director Larry Meckling, Building Official Koyren Kittrick, Development Services Fire Marshal Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Renton Reporter Land Use Action Request far Reconsideration, Appeals & Expiration The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14days of the effective date of decision. RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the effective date of decision, any party may request that a decision may be reopened by the Administrator (Decision -maker). The Administrator (Decision -maker) Nue ADU CUP.doc City of Renton Department of Commun Economic Development Administrati nditionol Use Permit Report & Decision HUE HUYNH ADU LUA10-036, CU -A Report of October 25, 2010 Page 9 of 9 may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator (Decision -maker) finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14 -day appeal timeframe. APPEAL: This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on November 8, 2010. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14 -day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's office, Renton City Hall — 7th f=loor, (425) 430-6510. Appeals must be fled in writing, together with the required fee to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court. EXPIRATION: The conditional use permit(s) approval will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. A one -(1) year extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-9-030.0 [see also RMC 4-1- 800H and 1]. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. RMC 4-2-080A.7 requires that the property owner shall file an affidavit affirming that the owner will occupy the principal dwelling or the ADU. This affidavit shall be submitted to the Planning Division Project Manager prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. RMC 4-2-080A.7 also requires that prior to the issuance of building permits; the owner shall record a notice on the property title. The notice shall bear the notarized signature of all property owners listed on the property title and include the legal description of the property, a copy of the approved site/floor plan, and the applicability of the restrictions regarding ADUs in RMC Title IV. Prior to recording of the notice the owner shall submit a copy to the Planning Division Project Manager for review and approval. 3. Construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 am and 8:00 pm, Monday through friday. Work on Saturdays shall be between the hours of 9:00 am and 8:00 pm. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. Hue ADU CUP.doc tp� g PSI w � EXHIBIT ',& nom rc2 99 M" Q x w co CLCL �© oU)o Ld z a= roar ¢rte O§ to 's 11 Lu ZD z bf_� 9a;F LO I I I I II Iall U gib' LU li W� LL[�W7—tends- 1 o - --_nW— - - — --I:. 7-7 a I I I K Dtt I I Dtt , 1 li � � 1 � e.p'IrvL L6-Sab110111�b�w�GO.]\AT' wKi:u �w - oilel,/VWw\.� rvd rx �dP�:� - 016[ 91 d^n --- 2 g & ! EXHIBIT 3 7 � � �bm'xo•wHa co \;tt EXHIBIT 4N011100QNd 7NQ0�Iaa+- az��rag �.W...,., Ir r Li I i I i I C o f rr�11�� V D III � W W W _N O Z a' Z �O N = � 00 Q Z O= 4 VI Z w 0 W o� Z Y J d C7 J W 2 a L� li J In :D m O VV,, a � W V1 my) O 2 - N O z g pz dO 4Y z =H Z az 3 4 o ww Eliw KV W W p N U � 7 C W J m Vl OV n J dzz wa o a a - W OEn U i n W O J z m U Z H � U zO W F V J Z ZVI aa�nwi mw z vaz=0 F,2 r U wW a 2 30 W ❑ " m 0 Y J J_ 0 Vf DC7 w w z z 0 =>zH OV,oW< F� W Z N mo J QU a O ~ aQ W W Z 4 w ZO Z W OM O 0 C oa- Z a a G4 - 20 T23N R5E E 1/2 1 r . _...._rt Ili -1-1 !\ PI , _... ......_..... 1—I _ ---' -- € .. 19 ZONING MAP BOOK I4 - 32 T23N R5E E 1/2 �� PW TECHNICAL SERVICES PRINTED ON 11/13/09 ma axu�na . vwucrew.xm.dwv mt psPMvd b w�+av ��+[v.nM b Mrd on nrben inlormaum ralbblex of ihrMa form o 20G 400 29 T23N R5E E 1.12 nnFeet ., AI� ( 4 ® 1:4.800 5329 EXHIBIT 6 § 55® !)5 2a[,�■2mm §!k%0 zwU) mom J■■■ ƒ j City n. -enton Department of Community & Economic—evelopment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ,(' k; COMMENTS DUE. JUNE 11, 2010 APPLICATION NO: LUA10-035, CU -A DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 28, 2010 APPLICANT: Hue T. Huynh PLANNER: Jerry Wasser PROJECTTITLE: Hue Accessory Dwelling Unit PLAN REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 38,138 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 11410 SE Petrovitsky Road PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) in association with a single-family residence on a 38,138 square foot lot in the Residential - 14 dwelling units per acre zone. The proposed ADU is a converted garage structure. The ADU would have a floor area of 800 square feet and would have an attached 208 square foot covered patio. The site slopes gently downward from north to south. The proposed project is Categorically Exempt in SEPA regulations. Access to the proposed project would be from an existing driveway on SE Petrovisky Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Probable Minor Major impacts impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li hVGlare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 914/1c6 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and hove identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of R—ton Department of Community & Economic D_ - opment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: . COMMENTS DUE: ,DUNE 11, 2010 APPLICATION NO: LUA10-036, CU -A DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 28, 2010 APPLICANT: Hue T_ Huynh PLANNER: Jerry Wasser PROJECT TITLE: Hue Accessory Dwelling Unit PLAN REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 38,138 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 11410 SE Petrovitsky Road PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) in association with a single-family residence on a 38,138 square foot lot in the Residential - 14 dwelling units per acre zone. The proposed ADU is a converted garage structure_ The ADU would have a floor area of 800 square feet and would have an attached 208 square foot covered patio. The site slopes gently downward from north to south. The proposed project is Categorically Exempt in SEPA regulations. Access to the proposed project would be from an existing driveway on SE Petrovisky Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Environment Minor Impacts Probable More Major information Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li hVGlore Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. of D• ector or Authorized Representative 01, Date City of Re..ton Department of Community & Economic Dt,.,.lopment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:+� •-� COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 11, 2010 APPLICATION NO: LUA10-036, CU -A DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 28, 2410 DEVELOPMENT SER APPLICANT: Hue T. Huynh CITY 6F RENT PLANNER: Jerry Wasser PROJECTTITLE: Hue Accessory Dwelling Unit PLAN REVIEWER: KayrenKittrick MAY TTM SITE AREA: 38,138 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 11410 5E Petrovitsky Road URECEIV PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) in association with a single-family residence on a 38,138 square foot lot in the Residential - 14 dwelling units per acre zone. The proposed ADU is a converted garage structure. The ADU would have a floor area of 800 square feet and would have an attached 208 square foot covered patio. The site slopes gently downward from north to south_ The proposed project is Categorically Exempt in SEPA regulations. Access to the proposed project would be from an existing driveway on SE Petrovisky Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmentol Health Energy/ Notural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li ht/Glore Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14, 000 Feet C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. K 7� Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date VICES re City of Ren,on Department of Community & Economic De—opment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT �L ' .; COMMENTS DUE: ,TUNE 11, 2010 APPLICATION NO: LUA10-036, CU -A DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 28, 2010 APPLICANT: Hue T, Huynh PLANNER: Jerry Wasser PROJECT TITLE: Hue Accessory Dwelling Unit PLAN REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 38,138 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 11410 SE Petrovitsky Road I PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) in association with a single-family residence on a 38,138 square foot lot in the Residential - 14 dwelling units per acre zone_ The proposed ADU is a converted garage structure. The ADU would have a floor area of 800 square feet and would have an attached 208 square foot covered patio. The site slopes gently downward from north to south. The proposed project is Categorically Exempt in SEPA regulations. Access to the proposed project would be from an existing driveway on SE Petrovisky Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Lond/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li hVGlare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Culturol Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS {j jam/ Jy We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inform is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of Re,,ton Department of Community & Economic De—lopment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ��V-I j`) (.__ r. COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 11, 2010 APPLICATION NO: LUA10-03G, CU -A DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 28, 2010 CITY OF RENTO APPLICANT: Hue T. Huynh PLANNER: Jerry Wasser PROJECT TITLE. Hue Accessory Dwelling Unit PLAN REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick SiTE AREA: 38,138 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A RECEIVE LOCATION: 11410 SE Petrovitsky Road PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) in association with a single-family residence on a 38,138 square foot lot in the Residential - 14 dwelling units per acre zone. The proposed ADU is a converted garage structure. The ADU would have a floor area of 800 square feet and would have an attached 208 square foot covered patio. The site slopes gently downward from north to south. The proposed project is Categorically Exempt in SEPA regulations. Access to the proposed project would be from an existing driveway on SE Petrovisky Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants LandjShoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources 1�n0k�' 8`., POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS N QIA-k C. CODE RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Impacts impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li htIdlare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Nis toric/Culturol Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ICES N We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. of Director or Authorized Representative -ce J �)- ) �-Z I'D Dat City of R—ton Department of Community & Economic D lopment ENViRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I �' �` t � Y- COMMENTS DUE. JUNE 11, 2010 APPLICATION NO: LUA10-036, CU -A DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 28, 2010 DEVELOPMENT SEKVIUE OF, RF-NTON APPLICANT: Hue T. Huynh PLANNER: Jerry Wasser PROJECT TITLE: Hue Accessory Dwelling Unit MAY PLAN REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 38,138 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A ReCEIVED- LOCATION: 11410 SE Petrovitsky Road PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A SUMMARY of PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) in association with a single-family residence on a 38,138 square foot lot in the Residential - 14 dwelling units per acre zone. The proposed ADU is a converted garage structure. The ADU would have a floor area of 800 square feet and would have an attached 208 square foot covered patio. The site slopes gently downward from north to south_ The proposed project is Categorically Exempt in SEPA regulations. Access to the proposed project would be from an existing driveway on SE Petrovisky Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources i) QA -k_ B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS N VXQ_J C. ,C�ODE-RELATED COMMENTS I )Qw`..-` Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Impacts impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet :S We hove reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and hove identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Ah-olo Sign tur f Director or Authorized Representative DateI V1 City of Ren,on Department of Community & Economic Dev—opment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �— k'" COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 11, 2010 APPLICATION NO: LUA10-036, CU -A DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 28, 2010 APPLICANT: Hue T. Huynh PLANNER: Jerry Wasser PROJECT TITLE: Hue Accessory Dwelling Unit PLAN REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 38,138 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 11410 SE Petrovitsky Road PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) in association with a single-family residence on a 38,138 square foot lot in the Residential - 14 dwelling units per acre zone. The proposed ADU is a converted garage structure. The ADU would have a floor area of 800 square feet and would have an attached 208 square foot covered patio. The site slopes gently downward from north to south. The proposed project is Categorically Exempt in SEPA regulations. Access to the proposed project would be from an existing driveway on SE Petrovisky Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS Ado A -142 - 4 Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Impacts impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li ht/Glore Recreotion utifities Transportation Public Services Historic/Culturaf Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS •(;11,11_ A �r ltc-, �,4 1,10 w` e e w - We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Ff//jam /`� V / / L/ ��j} Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of R,...ton Department of Community & Economic De—lopment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 11, 2014 APPLICATION NO: LUA10-036, CU-AULATED: Earth APPLICANT: Hue T_ Huynh PLANNER: Jerry Wasser PROJECT TITLE: Hue Accessory Dwelling Unit N REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 38,138 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 11410 SE Petrovitsky Road PROPOSED BLDG A A (gross) N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a Dwelling Unit (ADU) in association with a single-family residence per acre zone. The proposed ADU is a converted garage stru have an attached 208 square foot covered patio. The sit Categorically Exempt in SEPA regulations. Access to the p p d p Road. ;; A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Nor: -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Probable Minor Major Impacts Impacts More lnformatigw Necessa Earth Air Water al Plants I Land%Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Heolth Energy/ Natural Resources nJQ B. POLICY -RELATED C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory of lot in the Residential - 14 dwelling units e a floor area of 800 square feet and would m north to south. The proposed project is rom an existing driveway on SE Petrovisky Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housin Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation utilities Transportation Public Services HistoriclCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application( �ith particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional infgRVa i t is needed to property assess this proms_ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of, t NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Appitcadon has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development IC'ED)— Planning Dl Vision of dor City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Pubfic Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE Op AppuCATION; May 29, 2010 PROTECT NAM"UMBER Huynh Accessory Dwelling Unit I LUAI"36, CU -A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Cordidonal use Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit in aoawith th a single-family residence on a 38,138 square f t lot in the Residential - 14 dwelling units per acre zone. The proposed ADU is a converted garage structure. The ADU woukJ have a flour area of 800 square feet and would have an attached 208 square foot covered patio. The site slopes gently downward from north to south. rhe proposed project is Categorically Exempt in SEPA tegulations. Access to she proposed preject would be from an existing driveway on SE Petrovb$cy Road, PROJECT LOCATION: 11419 SE Petrovitsky Road PUBLIC APPROVALS: Administrative Conditional Ilse Penna APPUCAMU"CIECT CONTACT PERSON: Han Phan, P_L.: PBG, LLC; 51305 ire Lane; $eatac, WA 96189; Eml: ha n l§1theconoe p 4grp.c our B G: biic a'n is ratwel sc led o 6 for eR o ea' o Cou a e 'n gl a.m. on the hh floorro nton al[. Comments on the above appikatim must be submitted In writing to Gerald VlfMer, Associate Planner, Deparbnerrt of Community & Ecannmk Development, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 p.m. on lune 11, 2016, ityou have questions about this proposal, or wish m he made a party of record and receive additional notificat on by mal, contact the Project Managef at 1425) 430-7382. Anyone who submits written commems wIl automatically become a parry of record and will be notified of arry decision on this project. If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this purposed project, compieb, this form and r. m to: City of Renton, CED, Planning !)Msion, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Fle Name / No.: Huynh Arc ryD—+ ling Unit / LUAIO-036, Cu -A NAME: MAKING ADDRE TELEPHONE NO.: =PLEASE THE PROfECr NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: May 20, 2010 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: May 26, 2010 OFiNELVR`E,. efito ' REIVTON. A,r+ CERTIFICATION I,P5 n K �iereby certify thatLd' es of thea ve document were posted in con picuous places or nearby thepro n lr Dater Signed: STATE O WASH GTO N ) 1 SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that G e <, +I, A C. was' -S -6 - signed a55 -.- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses an_d.nurposes mentioned in the instrument. Yn�1O C7 c1'+ L�L•t�iirth rNotary Public in and for the State of Washington fir2 Notary (Print): ` 1090-WIF My appointment expires: -.--- +i of < < r CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 28th day of May, 2010, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter & NOA documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Han Phan Contact Hue Huynh Owner/Applicant 300' Surrounding Property Owners See attached (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON j SS r i - COUNTY OF KING j 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Gerald C. WasserD(�► signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses es mentioned in the instrument. Dated: a ' - Notary ublic in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): V;. A 6 ; LC.b-et My appointment expires: MVV v s } c i iP Hue Huynh Accessory Dwelling Unit LUA10-036, CU -A 322305926808 322305929703 564860003008 ANDERSON JERRY & PATRICIA BOWMAN DEBRA G CABACCANG ALFREDO C+MARIA 0 17613 113TH SE 17614 113TH PL SE 17618 114TH PL SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 071200002005 322305909200 292305912605 CHOI CHUNG HO+MEI LAN CREAGER JERRY L DHALIWAL KANWAUIT 17611 114TH PL SE 11221 SE 176TH ST BALWINDER K DHALIWAL RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 11504 SE 176TH ST RENTON WA 98055 322305930107 322305900506 564860002000 FARRELL ROBERT F GONZALEZ VICTOR M HICKS RICHARD 17622 113TH PL SE 17306 119TH LN SE M7 11408 SE 177TH PL RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055 322305929604 292305902507 292305915707 HUMMEL DON HUYNH HUE INTERSTATE MANAGEMENT & CON PO BOX 59193 5041 RENTON AVE S 10764 SAND POINT WAY NE RENTON WA 98058 SEATTLE WA 98118 SEATTLE WA 98125 071200001007 292305909007 322305926907 LEUNG SUNG WING+PUL KUEN MORGAN IVAN E PALUMBO JOSEPH M 3010 17TH AVE S 11512 SE 176TH ST 17611 113TH PL SE SEATTLE WA 98144 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 071200003003 564860026009 292305912209 PEARSON TROY ALAN RENTON CITY OF SATURAY HORACIO V 17617 114TH PL SE 1055 S GRADY WAY 11430 SE 176TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98057 RENTON WA 98055 292305901509 322305930305 564860001002 SIMPSON PROPERTY GROUP WELLS RUDY L+ALICE R YEE SIU HUNG 8110 E UNION AVE STE 200 17709 116TH AVE SE 17612 114TH PL SE DENVER CO 80237 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055 UPW City Of (E' '- .. ... NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) — Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: May 28, 2010 PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Huynh Accessory Dwelling Unit / LUA10-036, CU -A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit in association with a single-family residence on a 38,138 square foot lot in the Residential - 14 dwelling units per acre zone. The proposed ADU is a converted garage structure. The ADU would have a floor area of 840 square feet and would have an attached 208 square foot covered patio. The site slopes gently downward from north to south. The proposed project is Categorically Exempt in SEPA regulations. Access to the proposed project would be from an existing driveway on SE Petrovisky Road. PROJECT LOCATION: 11410 SE Petrovitsky Road PUBLIC APPROVALS: Administrative Condtional Use Permit APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Han Phan, P.E.; PBG, LLC; 5130S166 1h Lane; Seatac, WA 98188; Eml: han@theconceptgrp.com PUBLIC HEARING: N/A Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner, Department of Community & Economic Development, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 p.m. on June 11, 2010. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager at (425) 430-7382. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED, Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98457. File Name / No.: Huynh Accessory Dwelling Unit / LUA10-036, CU -A NAM E: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: May 20, 2010 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: May 28, 2010 )7':! C?e3ctsacaa ;p i �" 9a'%73 "%7:. •y+• •p'� a'171 ilOC2 i i � . E3 errewea �.4SE � _.7rs•c ,.%3 � � �'8 � 9"cdi '.�C � '..) � t � 1 {(p .i -�� )7':! C?e3ctsacaa ;p Denis Law City o Mayor Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator May 28, 2410 Han Phan, P.E. PBG, LLC 5130 S 166th Lane Seatac, WA 98188 Subject: Notice of Complete Application Hue Huynh Accessory Dwelling Unit, LUA10-036, CU -A Dear Mr. Phan: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7382 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lam. �r Gerald C. Wasser Associate Planner cc: Hue T. Huynh / Owner(s) Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov O '�—IDG City of Renton Uva :,, iorl LAND USE PERMIT MAI 9. 0 - MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: I-Af- 77, 7�'M%IAW ADDRESS: //t//0 -5e I76 23� . CITY: �?-eAIMA) VV,4 ZIP: q� S TELEPHONE NUMBER: �L,)6 _ 7 747_ 04/5- 7 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER: CONTACT PERSON NAME: lv , COMPANY (if applicable):J,G'' GAG ADDRESS: � �Q �; %jvG 2y� CITY: 5-64 PV/4- ZIP: �WiRC5 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: AW4r //uY/V// A-541 PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)1LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: /1y10 - 5e KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): AFA 30 CoA 5_ EXISTING LAND USE(S): PROPOSED LAND USE(S): / EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNAT4QN (if applicable) r Y 4 EXISTING ZONING: /4 r PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): SITE AREA (in square feet): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: A/b/v45 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: A�0Aj10�- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable) NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applit'•able): H:ICEDIDataTorms-Templatesl5elf-Help HandoutslPlanninglmasterapp.doc - 1 - 06109 PROJECT INFORMA NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): I SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 60 �. �1., _ C)Ul � SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): /` y7�+.�,�. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): TION (continued PROJECT VALUE: p -p %D Gpp IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): ❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES sq- ft. ❑ WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included SITUATE IN THE 5� QUARTER OF SECTION% , TOWNSHIP 23 , RANGE ' IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: _ �GDi w 6l9YLL3. 2. A P_>" 71 77 yz:7 C0^)4 jiVAL 4. USC /May,'T Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Namels)declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that I am please check one) t� the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of a orizalion) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. L I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/herltheir free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Sig ture of Owner/Representative) Notary ilublir in and for th h" 11f ndWikUton � Stag 'A Washingto (Signature of Owner/Representative) KULBIIR SIN Notary (Print) v c� pp� -36im Jte"ge06 r , 2012 My appd"t"'t'xpires-. _._._._.. H:10ED1DatalForms-Templates%Self-Help Handoutslplanninglmasterapp.doc - 2 - 06/09 PREAPPLICATION MEETING FOR HUE ACCESSORY DWELLING & TEMPLE 11410 SE PETROVITSKY RD CITY OF RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Current Planning Division PRET 0-005 March 11, 2010 Contact Information: Planner: Gerald Wasser Public Works Reviewer: Kayren Kittrick Fire Prevention Reviewer: Dave Pargas Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell Phone: 425.430.7382 Phone: 425.430.7299 Phone: 425.430.7023 Phone: 425.430.7290 City of menton Planning Dvision M;iY 10 ",llij iii ECV"� Wi D Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use and/or environmental permits. Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre -application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department of Community and Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council). CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: March 11, 2010 TO: Jerry Wasser, Associate Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Preliminary Comments for Hue Temple and ADU 1. The preliminary fire flow is 1,500 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required_ One within 150 -feet and one within 300 -feet of the building. Applicant shall submit a water availability certificate from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. Any existing hydrants used to satisfy the requirements shall meet current fire code including 5 - inch storz fittings. 2 Building appears too small to require fire sprinkler or fire alarm systems. 3. Applicant shall apply for a building permit for a change of use and comply to all requirements of said permit. CT:ct huetemple Renton Fire Department PRE -FIRE PLANNING In an effort to streamline our pre -fire process, we are requesting that you submit a site plan of your construction project in one of the following formats which we can then convert to VISIO.vsd. This is required to be submitted prior to occupancy. ABC Flowcharter.aS ABC Flowcharter.aC Adobe Illustrator File.ai AutoCad Drawin .dw AutoCad Drawing. dgn Computer Graphics Metafile.egm Corel Cli art Format.cmx Corel DRAW! Drawing File Format.edr Corel Flow_ctl Enca sulated Postscript File.e s Enhanced Metafile.emf IGES Drawing File Format.i¢s Graphics Interchan e Format. if Macintosh PICT Format -pct Micrografx Desiper Ver 3. I.drw Micrografx Designer Ver 6.0.dsf Microstation Drawin .d Portable Network Graphics Format. of Postscript File. s Tag Image File Format.tif Text.txt Text.csv VISIO.vsd Windows Bitma .bm Windows Bitma .dib Windows Metafile.wmf Zsoft PC Paintbrush Bitma _ cx DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITYIref �®� SAND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M D R A N D U M DATE: March 4, 2010 TO: Jerry Wasser, Planning Division FROM: Kayren K. Kittrick, Development Engineering Supervisor .kz SUBJECT:, Utility and Transportation Comments Hue Temple Accessory Dwelling Unit & Fill Pre 10-008, 11410 SE Petrovitsky Road (aka 176t') NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary is preliminary and non-binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision -makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The following comments are based on the pre -application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. WATER: 0 This site is in the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. A letter of availability is required with the building permit. Water and fire hydrants are mapped in this vicinity, but the hydrants may not be available within the required distance. Any additional or separate service requirements shall meet SCWS standards. All fees are payable to the district. + Per the City Fire Marshal, the preliminary fire flow for this site is 1000 GPM. A fire hydrant serving this property is required. Any new construction must have one fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM and shall be located within 150 feet of the structure. This distance is measured along the travel route. The number of hydrants required is based on the calculated fire flow. • Any existing fire hydrants counted to serve this site may need to be fitted with 5 -inch Storz quick connect fittings to bring them up to current City code prior to occupancy of the building. • if a fire sprinkler system is required, a separate permit for the fire service line will be issued with the approved plans. SANITARY SEWER: • This site is in the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. A letter of availability is required with the building permit. Any additional or separate service requirements shall meet SCWS standards. All fees are payable to the district. Hue Temple Pre 10-008 Page 2of2 March 4, 2010 STORM DRAINAGE: • The project as presented may not trigger a drainage narrative addressing on-site improvements and erosion control and pipe conveyance design, in accordance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual, as adopted and amended by the City of Renton. If additional impervious surface exceeds 2000 square feet, a report and review may be required. The Surface Water SDC fee is $0.405 (but not less than $1,012) per square foot of new impervious area. This fee is collected at the time a construction or utility permit is issued, prior or concurrent to the issuance of the building permit. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: • Depending on use, a preliminary calculation of additional daily traffic per the ITE manual, S`h edition, would generate approximately 10 or less additional daily trips. A Traffic Mitigation fee will apply at $75 per additional daily trip. The traffic mitigation fee is payable with the building permit. ADU's used strictly as a dwelling are exempt from this fee. GENERAL: • Any utility construction in the public right-of-way, as well as the building utilities, will trigger a separate review at the time of submittal with all utility installations required to meet current City of Renton code. • All utility, drainage, and street improvements require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. • All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and vertical Control Network. • Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There will be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Development Fee sheet and City of Renton Drafting Standards for detailed information. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITYo c`t.of AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT '( S M E M O R A N D U M DATE: March 11, 2010 TO: Pre -application File No. 10-008 FROM: Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Hue Temple & Accessory Dwelling Unit General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre -application for the above - referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre -application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator, Planning Director, Development Services Director, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or online at www.rentonwa.gov Project Proposal: The subject property is located at 11410 SE Petrovitsky. The project site slopes downward from south to north. The proposed project site contains an existing 1,920 square foot single family residence (to remain). The site is 38,134 square feet in area and is zoned Residential —14 dwelling units per net acre (R-14). A proposal has been submitted to convert an existing garage structure into an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) and a religious institution (Hue Temple) in the western portion of the property. Note: The applicant did not submit a site plan with the pre -application materials. In order to adequately assess compliance with the City's development and design regulations a fully dimensioned site plan, elevations, and floor plans would be necessary. Such materials must be submitted with any formal application. Current Use: A 1,920 square foot single family residence (to remain) exists on the property. A structure which appears to have been originally constructed as a two -car garage also exists on the site. This garage has been converted into a dwelling and a religious institution without benefit of any land use or building permits. Zoning/Density Requirements: The subject property is zoned Residential -14 dwelling units per acre (R-14). One dwelling unit with one accessory dwelling unit per lot is allowed in the R-14 Zone with an approved Administrative Conditional Use Permit. h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\10-008.jerry\pre010-008, hue temple & accessory dwelling unit, r-14.doc Hue Accessory Dwelling Unit iple, PRE10-008 Page 2 of 4 March 11, 2010 Accessory dwelling units are not included in density calculations. Additionally, religious institutions are allowed in the R-14 zone with an approved Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. Note: The applicant has not indicated whether the religious institutional use or the single-family dwelling is the primary use requested. If the religious institution is the primary use, the existing single family dwelling and the dwelling in the converted garage must be clearly appurtenant to the religious institution and could be used for housing of temple religious leaders. Should the single-family use be the primary use, the religious institution use would not be permitted on the site and the dwelling unit in the converted garage could be considered as an accessory dwelling unit if appropriate development and design requirements are satisfied. Development Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-110A, "Development Standards for Residential Zoning Designations (Primary and Attached Accessory Structures) and RMC 4-2-110B, Development Standards for Residential Development (Detached Accessory Buildings) effective at the time of complete application. A copy of these standards is included. Building Standards —The R-14 zone does not have a maximum percentage building coverage. Building height is restricted to 30 -feet for residential uses (including accessory dwelling units) and to 20 -feet for commercial uses (including religious institutions). Note: The applicant has not indicated building coverage on the site nor the height of existing structures which are proposed to remain. The proposed ADU must be architecturally compatible to the primary structure. Plans submitted with a formal application should indicate such compatibility. The R-14 zone permits one accessory structure per residential structure with a maximum of 400 square feet provided it is architecturally consistent with the principal structure. The maximum size of an accessory dwelling unit is 800 square feet. The maximum floor area of all accessory buildings shall not be greater than the floor area of the primary residential use. Note: The size of the accessory structure and the dwelling unit in the converted garage is unknown at this time. Setbacks —Setbacks are the minimum required distance between the building footprint and the property line and any private access easement. The required minimum setbacks for accessory dwelling units in Zone R-14 are: Front yard -- 8 -feet for the primary structure; Rear yard for primary structures -- 12 -feet; Rear yard for accessory buildings — 3 -feet, unless located between the rear of the house and the rear property line, then 0 -feet is allowed; Rear yard for accessory dwelling unit — determined through administrative review, to be no less than 5 -feet and no greater than 10 -feet; h:\ced\planninglcurrent plan ning\preapps\10-008.jerry\pre010-008, hue temple & accessory dwe[ling unit, r-14.doc Hue Accessory Dwelling Unit iple, PRE10-408 Page 3 of 4 March 11, 2010 Side yard for primary structure — 4 -feet; and Side yards for accessory dwelling units — 4 -feet. All structures are existing and, therefore, unless additions are proposed they are not subject to setback requirements. Access/Parking: For residential uses each lot is required to accommodate off street parking for a minimum of two vehicles. Parking for religious institutions is required to accommodate one space for every 5 seats in the main auditorium; however, in no case shall there be fewer than 10 spaces. Parking areas must be developed as specified in RMC 4-4-080. The subject property appears to have sufficient room to accommodate residential or religious institution parking requirements. Significant Tree Retention: If significant trees (greater than 6 -inch caliper) are proposed to be removed a tree inventory and a tree retention plan along with a tree retention worksheet shall be provided with the formal land use application. The tree retention plan must show preservation of at least 10 percent of significant trees, and indicate how proposed building footprints would be sited to accommodate preservation of significant trees that would be retained. if the trees cannot be retained, they may be replaced with minimum 2 inch caliper trees at a ratio of six to one. Critical Areas: A wetland may be located on site. A Wetland Reconnaissance/Delineation is required at the time of formal application in order to determine the presence and/or proximity of wetlands. Environmental Review: Projects of the type and size proposed are Categorically Exempt from SEPA requirements unless critical areas are found to be present. An on-site wetland would trigger Environmental Review. The fee for Environmental Review is $1,000.00. A Critical Areas Review Fee may also be charged to cover 100 percent of the costs of a contract biologist's review. Permit Requirements: Accessory dwelling units in the R-14 zone require the approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit. The Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Environmental Review would be accomplished within an estimated time frame of 6 to 8 weeks. The fee for the Administrative Conditional Use Permit is $2,000.00. Staff would be supportive of the proposed accessory dwelling unit project if all Code requirements are satisfied. Religious institutions in the R-14 zone require the approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. The Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit and Environmental Review would be accomplished within an estimated time frame of 10 to 12 weeks. The fee for the Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit is $2,000.00. Staff would be supportive of the proposed religious institution if all Code requirements are satisfied. h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\10-0D8.jerry\preol0-008, hue temple & accessory dwelling unit, r-14.doc Hue Accessory Dweliing Unit & ple, PR€10-008 Page 4 of 4 March 11, 2010 Building and construction permits would be required. Note: Prior to occupying any structure as an accessory dwelling unit or a religious institution, the applicant must satisfy any required Building Code provisions. Fees: Building and construction permit fees would be required. Transportation and fire mitigation fees are not required for accessory dwelling units, but may be required for religious institutions. Renton School District Impact Fees became effective on January 18, 2010. The fees are $6,310.00 for each new single family unit and $1,258.00 for each new multi -family unit. Accessory dwelling units are considered as multi -family units for purposes of school impact fees. School impact fees are payable at the time of building permit issuance. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees is attached for your review. Expiration: Upon approval, a conditional use permit is valid for two years with a possible one year extension. Note: Formal application for a conditional use permit for an accessory dwelling unit or a religious institution would temporarily suspend Code Compliance enforcement for the continuation of these existing on-site uses. If no formal applications are filed, such uses must cease.] h.\ced\planning\current plan ning\preapps`10-008.jerry\preol0-008, hue temple & accessory dwelling unit, r-14.doc G4 - 20 T23N R5E E 1/2 RM-F� _.. R-8 RM -F w ... R'S I .... R& R-8 R-8 R-8 SE 16.'ro 8I c _S I S' �....I_ I 5 2M - _. ...... ............. •�. .,..i R 8 ' _ ... R-8 R-8 __.. � 5E 165p18, n h i R-8 e s�tl, Sl 5 2BF St E"l6eh P4r..... .... ... . .. ....... . .. __ I R 8 ZONING MAP BOOK 14 - 32 T23N R5E E 1/2 PW TECHNICAL SERVICES PRINTED ON 11/13/09 mLeninkmueu:.n,Lek ad Ine d.oe.hv...:. is mlva r,lenaaae, ra�alrvwmws w,k 0 200 400 0a u Feet Yt1� 1:4,600 1 �J� . —.1 1; H4 29 T23N R5E E 1/2 5329 ,� PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS This requirement may be waived by: Planning Division 1. Property Services PROJECT NAME 2. Public Works Plan Review MAY 3. Building DATE 4. Planning RECFE"M F-110 H:10ED%DatalForms-TempiateslSelf-Help HandoutslPlanninglwaiverofsubmillalregs.xls 06109 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVEk OF SUBMITTAL REQUIR..-..IENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS MMEN� Z. This requirement maybe waived by: 1. Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building 4. Planning Alc,is APU PROJECT NAME: DATE:,_3/// 'ZO/0 H:\CED1DatalForms-Templates%Seif-Help Handouts%Planning\wsiverofsubmittalreqs.xls 06109 PB 091 161100 5130 S. 166`h Lane SeaTac, WA 98188 206.229-6422 Project Narrative • Hue Huynh Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) 11410- SE 17611 Street Renton WA 98055. Site area = 38,138 sq. ft (0.88 acre) • The project site is in Zone R-14. The adjacent properties are in Zone R-14 • Converting an existing structure to an ADU City Of Pei �� t 4� r hlf, i t o f • The project site is currently a residential use_ The existing primary house will be remained. The project site had no wetland, steep slope, or any other environmental sensitive. • The soil survey prepared by the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service, indicates the soil type within the project as AgB (Alderwood gravelly sandy loam), SCS Hydrologic Soil Group C. The site grades generally from southwest to northeast. Stormwater runoff presently infiltrated to native soils. During heavy rainfall events, stormwater sheet flows in a northeast direction. • The project proposes to convert an existing structure to an ADU. Existing primary house will be remained. • Access for existing primary house and a new ADU will be from an existing driveway connecting to SE 176" Street. • No street improvement for this development. • Total estimated construction cost is range from $2,000 to $7,000. • Estimated quantity of fill is about 10 CY. • No trees are to be removed for this development. • Existing wetland is approximately 60 feet north of the property. Stream is approximately 200 feet north of the property. Pa QV LGa 5130 S. 166`h Lane SeaTac, WA 98188 206-229-6422 Conditional Use Permit Justification City Of OLWoo I Pi"'V?n" rig ofirrSi(1n A. This proposed project is to convert an existing structure (garage) into an accessory dwelling unit (ADU). The ADU living area is 800 square feet. The proposed structure (ADU) meets all city zoning requirements and all the utility providers. The owner will live in the existing house. The project doesn't require any street improvement, recreation area or any landscaping B. The new ADU will not affect the community need. C. The new ADU will not adverse effects on adjacent property. • An ADU will allow only an additional of one or two persons living in it. • Existing driveway connection from SE 176" Street will be used for the existing house and a new ADU. This driveway allows two additional parking for the new ADU and two parking for the existing house. • An existing driveway will be used for the existing house and a new ADU. There is no new driveway approach for the new ADU. • An ADU will not have any glare or creating noise around the area. • Landscaping is not requires for this project. There is no tree or any vegetation removal for this project. • The use for this ADU is not health center, sport activities, preschool facilities, or any others of a similar nature. • The new ADU will comply with IBU. • The new ADU doesn't require any street improvements. • Lot coverage is conforming to development standards. • All yard setbacks are conforming to development standards. • Building height is conforming to the development standards. City C) PRBC -art,, LOQ 5130 S.166`hLane SeaTac, WA 98188 206-229-6422 ra rrrr Construction Mitigation Description • The anticipation for construction date will be starting in June 2010 and end July 2010. • All the work will be done from Monday to Friday roughly from 10:00am to 5:OOpm and Saturday from 9:00am to 5:00pm. The project doesn't require any dirt hauling from job site. • Dust and noise will be very minimal during construction. Silt fence will be installed around the project site perimeter. • The project site is located adjacent to SE 176" ST and all work will be done on site. No traffic control plan require for this project. TL Investment Group. c/o Mr. Han Phan 5130 S. 166th Lane SeaTac, WA 98188 Subject: Site Evaluation . Hyunh Hue Property 11410 SE 176" Street Renton, Washington Parcel #2923059025 Dear Mr. Phan: A1derNW April 14, 2010 Project No. 40110 city Of Renton Fir xn irig f_)j V1; ron As requested, we have completed a site evaluation for the property located at 11410 SE 176th Street, in the City of Renton. The location of the subject parcel is shown on the attached Vicinity Map (Figure 1). The purpose of our work was to identify the limits of any wetland areas or streams on and immediately adjacent to the subject property. The property is identified as King County Tax Parcel ##2923059025 In conducting our site wetland evaluation, we followed the general procedures for the routine on-site methodology as outlined in the Washington State Wetlands Identijilcation and Delineation Manual (March 1997). This procedure involves analysis of vegetation patterns, soil conditions, and near -surface hydrology in making a determination of wetland conditions. Our scope of work included a site visit on April 5, 2010, at which time we completed our site evaluation. We revisited area on April 7, 2010 to review site conditions with respect to the mapped wetland area off the property to the north and west. WETLAND EVALUATION PROCEDURES For the purpose of this study, we used the wetland definition adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers (COE) for administering Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. According to this definition, wetlands are: "Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas." (33 CFR 32.3) In Washington State, the Shoreline Management Act and Growth Management Act have amended this definition to exclude some wetland situations by adding the following sentences to the wetland definition: 812 NE 83rd Street, Seattle, Washington 98115• Phone (206)334-1338 email aidernw@comcast.net TL Investment Group April 14, 2010 Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non -wetland sites, including but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-Iined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were intentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street or Highway. Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non - wetland areas to mitigate the conversion of wetlands. Delineation procedures are based on diagnostic environmental indicators of wetland vegetation, wetland soils, and wetland hydrology. These procedures, outlined in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (March 1997) are commonly }mown as a Triple Parameter Method. By definition, an area is designated as wetland when there are positive indicators for all three parameters. A listing of plant species has been developed for use in the methodology for delineating wetland areas. This listing assigns plant species to one of five indicator status categories ranging from Obligate wetland species, which almost always occur in wetlands, to Upland species, which rarely occur in wetlands. Under normal conditions, hydrophytic vegetation is determined to be present if more than 50 percent of the dominant species are in the Obligate (OBL), Facultative Wetland (FACW), or Facultative (FAC) indicator categories. Diagnostic indicators of hydric soils are related to soil saturation, which leads to anaerobic conditions in the soil. Under these conditions, decomposition of organic material is inhibited and soil minerals are reduced, creating characteristic soil colors that can be quantified by comparison with Munsell Soil Color Charts. A chroma of one or less in unmottled soils or a chroma of two or less in mottled soils generally indicates a hydric soil. In addition, soils that are saturated during the growing season satisfy a criterion for hydric soils. We used a hand auger and or shovel to collect soil samples from depths of 8 to 18 inches, or below the A horizon. Wetland hydrology is defined as inundated or saturated soil conditions for at least 14 consecutive days during the growing season. If no water is present at the time of evaluation, other indicators may include topographic low points or channels, flood debris, complete absence of vegetation, or presence of hydric soils. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS The subject property is an irregularly shaped parcel of approximately 0.9acres. It is located on the north side of SE 176"' Street (SE Petrovitsky Road) within the city limits of the City of Renton. The property is currently developed with a residential structure. There are similarly developed single family residential properties to the east along the north side of SE 176" Street. General conditions over the vicinity of the property are illustrated on the Vicinity Map (Figure 1), and on the Site Map (figure 2). These maps are from the King County Web site. The aerial photo is from 2007. Adjacent properties immediately to the east and to the west are occupied by existing multifamily residential developments. Properties to the south along SE 176'" Street are developed as residential subdivisions. There are single to the north is currently owned by the City of Renton and is largely undeveloped. Topographically, the property generally slopes down from about elev. 470 along SE 176`" Street to about elev. 445 along the northeast property corner. It slopes somewhat more steeply down from the northeast corner off the property to the northeast. At present, the property is developed with two residential structures on the southwest corner of the property. There are lawn and landscape plantings around the structures on the southwest corner of the property. Much of the remainder of the site has been cleared and is occupied by gravel surfaced parking and driveway. King County Sensitive Area maps available from the King County Web site show a large wetland off the property to the north and west, and a smaller wetland off the property to the east. These areas are indicated on the Vicinity Project No.40110 Page No. 2 Tl. lnvestrnent Group April 14, 2010 Map (Figure 1). The sensitive area maps also show a stream draining from the small inventoried wetland off the property to the east. This stream is shown and identified as Soos Creek on The City of Renton Water Class Map. This stream is designated as a City of Renton Class N stream north of the subject property. WETLAND EVALUATION As noted above, the majority of the property has been cleared_ We did not identify wetland conditions within the property boundaries. Conditions on the site at the time of the aerial photo of 2007, are illustrated on the Site Map (Figure 2) We did however, examine adjacent areas to the north and east to identify the general extent of the off-site inventoried wetlands. Vegetation immediately off the property to the north is dominated by Himalayan blackberry (Ruhus discolor). There is also a large big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum) tree within the blackberry growth. Off the property to the west the land had been graded and cleared for construction of the apartment complex, and it had been replanted in site landscaping. Vegetation on the undisturbed slope extending off the property to the east includes Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees. There is a broad topographic swale which originates on the slope below the northwest corner of the subject property. Vegetation within this swale includes Himalayan blackberry with some hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) and willow (Salix spp.). Observations with respect to soils, vegetation and hydrology, within the swale are characterized on attached data forms 2 and 3. The locations of Data Form 2 are approximately 50ft and 60ft north of the north property line respectively. Locations of the data forms are shown on the Site Map (Figure 2). These two data points are within the upper limits of the swale which slopes down to a more gently sloping area off the property to the north. Wetland conditions extend within the swale to the north below Data Point 2. The wetland conditions within the swale as identified at Data Point 2 are continuous with the larger inventoried wetland off the property to the north. The nearest extension of the off site wetland is within the head of eh swale approximately 50ft north of the property line. We did not have permission of the landowners to make a more complete any site evaluation of the property to more accurately define the extent of the wetland. We did not mark or more precisely determine the data point locations. Using the U.S. fish and Wildlife Service wetland classification system (Cowardin et al, 1979), the larger wetland includes three wetland habitat classes; Palustrine deciduous forest, and palustrine scrub -shrub and palustrine emergent. Wetland Classification The City of Renton Code identifies three wetland categories as identified in (RMCM-la i. Category 1: Category 1 wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) The presence of species listed by Federal or State government as endangered or threatened, or the presence of essential habitat for those species; and/or (b) Wetlands having forty percent (40%) to sixty percent (60%) permanent open water (in dispersed patches or otherwise) with two (2) or more vegetation classes; and/or (c) Wetlands equal to or greater than ten (10) acres in size and having three (3) or more vegetation classes, one of which is open water; and/or (d) The presence of plant associations of infrequent occurrence; or at the geographic limits of their occurrence; and/or Project No.40110 Page No. 3 TI. Investment Group April 14, 2010 ii. Category 2: Category 2 wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) Wetlands that are not Category 1 or 3 wetlands; and/or (b) Wetlands that have heron rookeries or osprey nests, but are not Category I wetlands; and/or (c) Wetlands of any size located at the headwaters of a watercourse, i.e., a wetland with a perennial or seasonal outflow channel, but with no defined influent channel, but are not Category 1 wetlands; and/or (d) Wetlands having minimum existing evidence of human -related physical alteration such as diking, ditching or channelization; and/or iii. Category 3: Category 3 wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) Wetlands that are severely disturbed. Severely disturbed wetlands are wetlands which meet the following criteria: (1) Are characterized by hydrologic isolation, human -related hydrologic alterations such as diking, ditching, channelization and/or outlet modification; and (2) Have soils alterations such as the presence of fill, soil removal and/or compaction of soils; and (3) May have altered vegetation. (b) Wetlands that are newly emerging. Newly emerging wetlands are: (1) Wetlands occurring on top of fill materials; and (2) Characterized by emergent vegetation, low plant species richness and used minimally by wildlife. These wetlands are generally found in the areas such as the Green River Valley and Black River Drainage Basin. (c) All other wetlands not classified as Category 1 or 2 such as smaller, high quality wetlands. The wetland does not meet the criteria as a Category 3 wetland because it is relatively large and has not been significantly altered, although in the past there had been some ditching and a dike constructed within what is now the main body of the mapped wetland. It does not meet the criteria as a Category I wetland because it does not include the presence or habitat for species identified as endangered or threatened (criteria 1:a); it does not include large areas of open water (criteria I:b); and it does not have plant associations of infrequent occurrence (criteria 1:d) The King County Sensitive Area Maps as illustrated on Figure 1, do not show details within the main body of the wetland. Instead, there is a Iarge blue trap unit covering the main wetland area. In addition there are two smaller sections within the wetland covered with the blue mapping unit. The map legend identifies the blue mapping unit as designating lakes and large rivers. It is my observation that the large blue map unit covering the main section of the larger wetland is now occupied by a cattail (Typha latifolia) marsh. Cattail is the predominant vegetation across the larger open expanse covered by the blue map unit. Project No.40110 Page No. 4 TL Investment Group April 14, 2010 The smaller blue map units appear to represent areas within the wetland which had been excavated. They are now overgrown with shrub vegetation and do not represent open water. Criteria 1:c for Renton Category 1 wetland requires that a wetland he greater than 10 acres in overall size and that it include three vegetation classes, one of which is open water. While the wetland is greater than ten acres and includes three vegetation classes, there is no open water. Without the open water vegetation class, the wetland does not meet the criteria as a Renton category 1 wetland. The off-site wetland satisfies the criteria for designation as a City of Renton Category 2 wetland in part because it is located at the headwaters of Soos Creek., and as outlined above, it does not meet the criteria for designation as a Category 1 or Category 3 wetland. Wetland Buffers The standard buffer for a City of Renton Category 2 wetland in the City of Renton is 50ft. With the nearest approach of the off-site wetland being approximately 50ft beyond he property boundary, the 50ft wetland buffer extends to close to the north property line. If new development is being proposed on the property it may be necessary to make a more complete evaluation to measure and more accurately plot the extent of the off site wetland limits. STREAM STUDY There is a seasonal stream mapped within the large off site wetland and draining to the east across 116th Avenue SE, as shown on the City of Renton Water Class Map. The stream is identified on the map as Soos Creek. The segment of Soos Creek originating within the large wetland and extending eastward to 116`h Ave SE is mapped as a City of Renton Class W stream. The assigned buffer for Class 1V streams is 35ft. The streamis more than 35feet from the subject proeprty and the assigned 35ft buffer does not extend to the property limits. We trust the information presented is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call. Sincerely yours, AlderNW aret P. Munger Project Scientist Encl.: Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Site Map Data Forms (3) Project No.40110 Page No. 5 DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION Describe General Site Dense blackberry thicket Conditions: Data Point No.: DP -1 Site Disturbance? Location: See site Map VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Dominant Plant Species U Cn 1 Rubus discolor up/ S 8 2 9 3 10 4 11 5 12 6 13 7 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 0 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Rationale: Soil Type: Histic Epipedon? Matrix Color: 1OYR4/3 Other hydric soil indicators: No Is the hydric soil criterion met? no SOIL Hydric Soils List: - Mottles? no Mottle Colors: Rationale: Chroma value greater than 2 HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? Not in upper I8" Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: Not in 18" Other Feld evidence hydrology: no Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? no Rationale: No water table in 18" WETLAND DETERABNATION Are wetland criteria met? no Rationale for wetland decision: Non hydric soils No water table in upper 18 " Gleyed? no Depth: Project Name: Hyunh Hue Property AlderNW Field investigators): G. Munger 518 North 59th Street Project No.: 40110 Date: 4-5-10 Seattle, Washington 98103 DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION Describe General Site Dense blackberry thicket Conditions: Data Point No.: DP -2 Site Disturbance? Location: See site Map VEGETATION Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 66 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? yes Rationale: More than 50% species hydrophytic Soil Type: Histic Epipedon? Matrix Color: 10YR412 Other hydric soil indicators: No Is the hydric soil criterion met? SOIL Hydric Soils List: - Mottles? yes Mottle Colors: yes Rationale: Chroam value 2 with mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? yes Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: 8" Other field evidence hydrology: no Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? yes Are wetland criteria met? yes Rationale for wetland decision: Rationale: Free water at 8" WETLAND DETERMINATION soils; Water table at 8" Project Name: Hyunh Hue Property Field Investigator(s): G- Manger Project No.: 40110 Date: 4-5-10 Gleyed? no Depth: AlderNW 518 North 59th Street Seattle, Washington 98103 Dominant Plant Species Dominant Plant Species C I Rubus discolor UPI S 8 2 Alnus rubra Fac T 9 3 Crataegus spp. Fac S 10 4 11 5 12 13 7 14 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 66 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? yes Rationale: More than 50% species hydrophytic Soil Type: Histic Epipedon? Matrix Color: 10YR412 Other hydric soil indicators: No Is the hydric soil criterion met? SOIL Hydric Soils List: - Mottles? yes Mottle Colors: yes Rationale: Chroam value 2 with mottles HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? yes Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: 8" Other field evidence hydrology: no Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? yes Are wetland criteria met? yes Rationale for wetland decision: Rationale: Free water at 8" WETLAND DETERMINATION soils; Water table at 8" Project Name: Hyunh Hue Property Field Investigator(s): G- Manger Project No.: 40110 Date: 4-5-10 Gleyed? no Depth: AlderNW 518 North 59th Street Seattle, Washington 98103 DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION Describe General Site Dense blackberry thicket Conditions: Data Point No.: DP -3 Site Disturbance? Location: See site Map VEGETATION Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 66 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? yes Rationale: Soil Type: Histic Epipedon? Matrix Color: IOYR413 Other hydric soil indicators: No Is the hydric soil criterion met? no Is the ground surface inundated? No Is the soil saturated? no Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: Other field evidence hydrology: no Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? no 16" SOIL More than 50% species hydrophytic Hydric Soils List: - Mottles? yes Mottle Colors: Gleyed? no Depth: Rationale: Chroam value greater than 2 with mottles HYDROLOGY Surface water depth: Rationale: Water level below 12" WETLAND DETERAIUNATION Are wetland criteria met? no Rationale for wetland decision: Non Hydric soils; Water table at 16" Project Name: Hyunh Hue Property AlderNW Field Investigator(s): G. Munger 518 North 59th Street Project No_: 40110 Date: 4-5-10 Seattle, Washington 98103 Dominant Plant Species Dominant Plant Species 0� 1 Rubus discolor up/ S 8 2 Alnus rubra Fac T 9 3 Crataegus spp. Fac S 10 4 11 5 1121 6 13 71 141 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 66 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? yes Rationale: Soil Type: Histic Epipedon? Matrix Color: IOYR413 Other hydric soil indicators: No Is the hydric soil criterion met? no Is the ground surface inundated? No Is the soil saturated? no Depth to free-standing water in probe hole: Other field evidence hydrology: no Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? no 16" SOIL More than 50% species hydrophytic Hydric Soils List: - Mottles? yes Mottle Colors: Gleyed? no Depth: Rationale: Chroam value greater than 2 with mottles HYDROLOGY Surface water depth: Rationale: Water level below 12" WETLAND DETERAIUNATION Are wetland criteria met? no Rationale for wetland decision: Non Hydric soils; Water table at 16" Project Name: Hyunh Hue Property AlderNW Field Investigator(s): G. Munger 518 North 59th Street Project No_: 40110 Date: 4-5-10 Seattle, Washington 98103 Not to scale Reference King County Web Site VICINITY MAP ALDERNW Hyunh Hue Property Renton, Washington Proj. No.40110 Date Apr., 2010 Figure 1 Not to scale Reference King County Web Site Aerial photo dated 2007 SITE MAP ALDERN t /� I Hyunh Hue Property u � Renton, Washington j. No.40110 1 Date Apr., 2010 1 Figure 2 vso5' L 10 513U S. 166`h Lane Sea7ac, WA 98188 206-229-6422 DRAINAGE MEMO Date: May 15, 2010 To: City of Renton Public Works Department From: Han Phan, PE Subject: Hue Huynh ADU E!'IREs � Design Requirements The City of Renton utilizes the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual (KCSWM) for its drainage requirements. Per Section 1.1.1 of the KCSWM and Figure 1.1,2.A, the project is not require any drainage review because the project is results in 660 SF of new impervious surface. Current Drainage Condition The 660 SF of new impervious of the roof is currently using the application of basic dispersion with splash block, City of pra`'''ro'g Dives �°t7 1.1.2 DRAINAGE REVIEW TYPES AND REQUIREMENTS FIGURE 1.1.2.A FLOWCHART FOR DE'T'ERMINING TYPE OF DRAINAGE REVIEW REQUIRED Is the project a single family residential or agricultural project that results in >_2,000 sf of new and/or replaced impervious surface or !!7,000 sf of land disturbing activity. AND meets one of the following criteria? • The project results in x10,000 sf of total impervious surface added since 1/8101, <_5,000 sf of new impery surface, and x35, 000 sf of new pervious surface (for RA, F, or sites, new pervious surface is <52,500 sf or remainder of site if a65% is preserved in native vegetation), OR *The project results in x10,000 sf of total impervious surface added since Yes 118101 and new pervious surface is x35,000 — 3.25 x newimpervious surface (for sites 2-22,000 sf, use 2.25, and for RA, F, or A sites, increase by 50% or use remainder of site if k65% is preserved in native vegetation), OR • The project results in x4% total impery surface and <_15% new pervious surface on a single parcel site zoned RA or F, or a singleimultiple parcel site zoned A, and all impervious area on the site, except 10,000 sf of it, will be set back from natural location of site discharge at least 100 It per 10,000 sf of total impervious surface? IM Does the project result in >_2,000 sf of new and/or replaced impervious surface or >_7,000 sf of new pervious surface, OR is the project a redevelopment project on a parcel or combination of parcels in which new No plus replaced impervious surface totals >_5,000 sf and whose valuation of proposed improvements (excluding required mitigation and frontage improvements) is >50% of the assessed value of existing improvements? Yes SMALL PROJECT DRAINAGE REVIEW Section 1.1.2.1 Note: The project may also be subject to Targeted,LDrainage Review as detennined below. Does the project have the characteristics of one or more of the following categories of projects (see more detailed threshold language on p. 1-15)? 1. Projects containing or adjacent to a flood, erosion, or steep slope hazard area; projects within a Critical Drainage Area or Landslide Hazard Drainage Area; or projects that propose ?7,000 sf (1 ac if project is in Small Project Drainage Review) of land disturbing activity. 2. Projects proposing to construct or modify a drainage pipelditch that is 12" or larger or receives runoff from a 12" or larger drainage pipe/ditch. 3. Redevelopment projects proposing ?$100,000 in improvements to an existing high -use site. Reassess whether drainage review is required per Section 1.1.1 (p. 1-9). Is the project an Urban Planned Development (UPD), OR does it result in >50 acres of new impervious surface within a subbasin or multiple subbasins that are hydraulically connected, OR does it have a project site>50 acres within a critical aquifer recharge area? Yes 2009 Surface Water Design Manual No Yes TARGETED DRAINS Section 1.1 FULL']DRAINAGE REVIEW Section 1.1:2.3' LARGE PROJECT: DRAINAGE REVIEW Section 1:.1.2.4 1/9/2009 This certificate provides Certificate : 5288 information necessary to cid ►-f?oi'I evaluate proposals. deveiopmerrt SOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DIS INI,, CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY Type: Rezone or other Applicant's Name: Han Phan Proposed Use: Converting the garage into an ADU Location: Lot: Block: Development: Parcel: 292305 9025 Address: 11410 SE 176TH ST, RENTON Information: Existing single family residence and garage ( Attach map & Legal description if necessary ) SEWER PURVEYOR INFORMATION Sewer service will be provided by service connection only to an existing se��er main NuiI feet from the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed area. Other (describe): Sewer service will require the installation of sewer mainline to serve this property. All plans must be approved by and meet the requirements of-KCWTDD and Sous Creek beater and Sever District. 2. a /l The sewer system is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan. b i The sewer system improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment. 3.The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary a Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city. L, Anunexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. Service is subject to the following: a r/I Connection Charge: Yes b 1%iJ Easement (s): Yes C .L other: See conditions 1 b above and conditions below. Service is subject to the applicants agreement to comply and perform to trance such installation and/or connections to the standards, regulations, requirements aa -td conditions of this District and such other agency or agencies having jurisdiction. This District is not representing that it's facilities will be extended or otherwise modified to make such service available to the applicant. It is the responsibility of the applicant to make any required extension of facilities to serve their property. 1 hereby certify that the above sewer purveyor information is true. This certification sliall be valid for one year from date of signature. SODS CREEK WATER &_SEWER DISTRICT Darci McConnell 4/27/2010 Agency Name Signatory Name Date f Development Coordinator Title Sig/ tune Date' Saw C¢eekWaecr Be Sr IL7i5Inc["ipiAvaL]siLIFI&M.eLAddSewer"2i&96 This certificate provides Certificate : 44 3, 6 information necessary to Cay 0 - f evaluate development Re" ()n proposals. ?!lrrt�:1i`'rfon SODS CREED WATER AND SEWER DISTRI�G ,, - 1 TE F WATER AVAILABILITY - Type: CERTIFICATE D Type: Rezone or other: Applicant's Name: Han Phan Proposed Use: Converting garage into an ADU Location: Lot: Bloch: Development: Parcel: 292305 9025 Address: 11410 SE 176TH ST, RENTON Information: Existing single family residence and garage WATER PURVEYOR INFORMATION 1. a % Water will be provided by service corurection only to an existing VAC inch water main, 20' feet Broin the site. And/ Other b ..__ Water service will require an improveirrerrt to the water systeur of: 2, a v/ The water system is in conformance with a County approved water cumprelrensive plan. b The water system improvement will require a water cornprelreusive plan amendaieut. 3 a ',� `fhe proposed project is within the corporate lirivts of the district, or bas been granted Boundary Review- Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city, or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. b .Ji Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. a r/ Water is/or will be available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at uo less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant 15' feet from the buildinglproperty (or as marked on the attached nlap): Rate of Flow: 1,000 glom Duration. 2 hours b Water system is not capable of providin- fire flow. Cross Connection Control devices must be in conformance with state laws. Service is subject to the applicants agreement to comply and perform to Hulce such ilistallatiou an6/or connections to the standards, regulations, requirements and conditions of this District and such other agency or agencies haviiig jurisdiction. This District is not represenling that its facilities will he extended or other-xise modified to make such service available to the applicant. It is the responsibility of the applicant to make any required extension of facilities to serve their Property. I hereby certify that the above water purveyor information is true- This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. SOOS CREEK WATER &: SEWER DISTRICT Agency Name DcveIopment Coordinator Title Suns C7cek 5Va�er k D,svicc "��nAvailS ii�gleYaeeeLldd�4'ate:"'_k190 Darci McConnell 4/27%2610 - - Skmatory NaEne i)atc: A�A i��k $[,]nature Jaic icit 4 EJ--- - ..... �$, 3'3'3AY H19}} esocr6�xo ' - s -c sVsgno 9e -F3 1 rcw!�rV x41�SS rwlM�r� '.I.A4nva46: �".. J 56'31 '-10 41 IiP16 55 e.- ry a S. -0s 0. 4� po 06 F nI 1 6RynR:'Ns�rt _fin r 00 : le a eta _- U _ ii'fbE a oo-ai t a �P I ' s 3lrS Yil1 Y '49 S�i� et ]OSSY 1, I 56'1 1• 9i'9ot '�{ vS �a 1 � :i 06S - a- � EJ--- - ..... �$, 3'3'3AY H19}} esocr6�xo ' - s -c sVsgno 9e -F3 1 rcw!�rV x41�SS rwlM�r� '.I.A4nva46: �".. J 56'31 '-10 41 IiP16 55 e.- ry a S. -0s 0. 4� po 06 F nI 1 6RynR:'Ns�rt _fin r 00 : le a eta _- U _ ii'fbE a oo-ai t a �P I ' s 3lrS Yil1 Y '49 S�i� et ]OSSY 1, I 56'1 1• 9i'9ot '�{ vS �a 1 � :i 06S Printed: 05-20-2010 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA10-036 05/20/2010 03:57 PM Total Payment: 2,000.00 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Receipt Number: Payee: HUE HUYNH City of Penton Pliannirig Division HUMMED UM Trans Account Code Description Amount ------------------------------------------------------------------_____ 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 2,000.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount ---------- Payment -------- --------------------------- Check 2005 --------------- 2,000.00 Account Balances Trans ------ Account Code ------------------- Description ------------------------------ Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee ___------------ .00 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat .00 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD .00 5014 000.345-81..00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone .00 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence .00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees .00 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE - USE 3954 .00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage .00 5998 000.231 70.00.0000 Tax .00 Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 R1002293