Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 01 - 2 of 3Wetland/Stream Study: Hawks Landing Crowne Plaza Hotel Prepared for: �16+ Dan Mitzel Hawk's Landing LLC 1111 Cleveland Ave. Mount Vernon, WA 98273 ?-,e "Wo 00 Prepared by: O : .A Graham -Bunting Associates Environmental & Land Use Services 3643 Legg Road Brno, WA 98232 Ph. 364.766.4441 Fa, 360.7665 4443 May 12, 2009 Table of Contents Section/Subsection Paye Project Summary ---- —------------------------ —---------- --------------- H. 1.0 Introduction -------------------------------- ---- --------------- 1 2.0 Existing Conditions 3.0 Project Description --------------------------------------------- 3 4.0 Existing Information ----- --- ------ —----- w.-..— 3 4.1 National Wetland Inventory ------ ------------------------ 3 4.2 Soil Survey of King County -------------------------- 4 4.3 May Creek Basin Action Plan ---- __________ _ 5 4.4 Barbee Mill (BA) -------------------------------------------- 5 4.5 Fawcett Property Wetland Delineation -------------------- 5 4.6 Forest Practice Activity Map --------------------------- 5 5.0 Stream Study _____.._------- — . 5 5.1 Riparian Functions _----------------------------------------- 5 5.2 Ordinary High Water Mark - -------------------- 7 5.3 Stream Classification and Regulations -------------- --- 8 6.0 Wetland Study9 6.1 Methodology ------------ --------- 9 6.2 Findings ------------------------ -____---__------------- 10 6.3 Data Summary Table ------------------------------------ 11 6.4 Data Digest ------------------------------ 6.5 Wetland Classification and Regulations --------------- 12 7.0 Regulatory Summary and Mitigation Measures --------- 13 7.1 May Creek ------------- --------------- ----- ------------------- 13 7.2 Drainage Ditch (Class 5 Water) --------------------------- 14 7.3 Wetlands A and B ----- ----------- ------_ _—___-_-- 14 7.4 Drainage Ditch (nonregulated wetland) ------ ----------- -- 14 7.5 Water Quality ------------------------------------------------ 14 8.0 Closure ----------------------------------- ----- 14 9.0 References --- ----- ------- --- -- 15 Attachments Wetland Delineation and Stream Study Existing Conditions Site Plan -- Attachment A Proposed Conditions-------------------------------------------------------- Attachment B Wetland Field Data Forms -------------------------------------------------- Attachment C Graham-BuntiniZ Associates i Environmental &Land U e Services Hawks Landing May 2009 PROJECT SUMMARY Project: Construction of a 5 story, 122,000 square foot, 173 room hotel including underground parking and ground level parking. Project Site: The project site is a 3.06 -acre area situated on a triangular shaped parcel of approximately 7.8 acres. The subject property is bordered by Interstate 405 in the east, Lake Washington Boulevard in the west and an undeveloped parcel to the south. Project Location. The subject property is located at the southwest corner of the Interstate 405 and Lake Washington Boulevard/N.E. 44" Street exit at 4350 Lake Washington Boulevard North, within portions of Sections 29 and 32, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, WA. King County Parcel Number: 3224059049. Project Proponent: Dan Mitzel Hawk's Landing LLC 1111 Cleveland Ave. Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Methods: Wetland — Routine On -Site Methodology, 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Technical Report Y-97- 1) - Corps Interim Regional Supplement, April 2008 Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, March I997, Ecology Publication #96-94 City of Renton Critical Area Regulation: RMC 4-3-050 City of Renton Shoreline Master Program: RMC 4-3-090 Field Dates: March 23, April 8, April 14 and April 24, 2009 Streams & Wetlands: May Creek — Class I Water, Shoreline of the State Drainage ditch — Class 5 Water/Nonregulated Wetland Wetland A — 433 square foot Category 2 Wetland Wetland B — 481 square foot Category 2 Wetland Proposed Mitigation: Subject proposal will avoid any direct impacts to regulated streams and wetlands by maintaining setback/buffers that exceed the standards of the City's Critical Area Regulations and Shoreline Master Program. Project Staff: Patricia Bunting, Wetland Ecologist PWS Oscar Graham, Wetland Ecologist Graham-Buntint Associates ii Environmental & Land Use Services hawks Landing Mav 2009 ._r 1.4 Introduction At the request of Hawks Landing LLC, Graham -Bunting Associates (GBA) have conducted a site investigation and prepared the following report addressing streams and wetlands within and adjacent to the site of the proposed Hawk's Landing Crowne Plaza Hotel. The report addresses the stream and wetland study requirements established under the City of Renton's Critical Areas Regulations (RMC 4-3-050). The report includes a characterization of existing conditions, project description, summary of existing information sources and a narrative description of our investigative procedures and findings. The report includes plan sheets prepared by Sound Development Group depicting existing and proposed site conditions. 2.0 Existing Conditions The subject properly is located at the southwest corner of the Interstate 405 and Lake Washington BoulevardlN.E. 44 Street exit at 4350 Lake Washington Boulevard North, within portions of Sections 29 and 32, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M.; King County, WA. King County Parcel Number. 3224059049. The project site is a 3.06 -acre area situated on a triangular shaped parcel of approximately 7.8 acres. The subject property is bordered by Interstate 405 in the east, Lake Washington Boulevard in the west and an undeveloped parcel to the south. The property is currently occupied by Pan Abode Cedar Homes and is developed with metal warehouses used for manufacturing and storing materials associated with the production of cedar homes. An admini trative office is also located on the site. The buildings are constructed on a fill pad surfaced with crushed rock and asphalt. The site has been fully developed for industrial purposes. Graham-BuntingAmodaies 1 Environmental & Land Use Services Hawks LandinAssessment 5112109 Graham Bunting Associates May i2, 2009 Environmental & Land Use Services 3643 Legg Road, Bow, WA 98232 Dan Mitzel Ph. 360.766.4441 Fx, 360.766.4443 Hawk's Landing LLC 111 I Cleveland Ave. Mount Vernon, WA 98273 StreamfWetland Study (Portions of Section 29 & 32 Township 24 north, Range 5 East, W.M., Renton, WA) 1.4 Introduction At the request of Hawks Landing LLC, Graham -Bunting Associates (GBA) have conducted a site investigation and prepared the following report addressing streams and wetlands within and adjacent to the site of the proposed Hawk's Landing Crowne Plaza Hotel. The report addresses the stream and wetland study requirements established under the City of Renton's Critical Areas Regulations (RMC 4-3-050). The report includes a characterization of existing conditions, project description, summary of existing information sources and a narrative description of our investigative procedures and findings. The report includes plan sheets prepared by Sound Development Group depicting existing and proposed site conditions. 2.0 Existing Conditions The subject properly is located at the southwest corner of the Interstate 405 and Lake Washington BoulevardlN.E. 44 Street exit at 4350 Lake Washington Boulevard North, within portions of Sections 29 and 32, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M.; King County, WA. King County Parcel Number. 3224059049. The project site is a 3.06 -acre area situated on a triangular shaped parcel of approximately 7.8 acres. The subject property is bordered by Interstate 405 in the east, Lake Washington Boulevard in the west and an undeveloped parcel to the south. The property is currently occupied by Pan Abode Cedar Homes and is developed with metal warehouses used for manufacturing and storing materials associated with the production of cedar homes. An admini trative office is also located on the site. The buildings are constructed on a fill pad surfaced with crushed rock and asphalt. The site has been fully developed for industrial purposes. Graham-BuntingAmodaies 1 Environmental & Land Use Services Hawks LandinAssessment 5112109 Little native vegetation exists within the subject property itself. The eastern and western perimeters, predominantly within the right of ways of I-405 and Lake Washington Boulevard exhibit a mix of native and invasive plant species. Trees consist of red alder (Alnus rubra), paper birch (Betula papyrifera), black cottonwood (Populus balsimifera) and Western red cedar (Thuja plicata). Shrubs are dominated by Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), red osier dogwood (Cornus stolonifera), Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis), Japanese knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum) and sword fern (Polystichum munitum). An open drainage ditch located between the project site and Lake Washington Boulevard exhibits a small community of cattail (7ypha latifolia) and a thick mat of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea). The parcel located south of the subject property includes lower May Creels and its associated riparian corridor. The distance from the subject property to May Creek varies from 235 feet in the east (adjacent to the on-ramp to I-405) to 58 feet in the west (adjacent to Lake Washington Boulevard). A mature deciduous forest consisting of large black cottonwood (16"- 36" dbh), alder and big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum) dominates the riparian corridor. The understory includes vigorous colonies of invasive blackberry and Japanese knotweed, salmonberry (Rebus spectabilis), reed canarygrass and sword fern. A small community of slough sedge (Carex obnupta) was observed in conjunction with a wetland identified along the right bank of May Creek. The subject property is predominantly flat, however, the northern portion of the site, adjacent to the entrance of the existing Pan Abode facility, resembles a bowl shaped depression designed to receive stormwater runoff from multiple catch basins located along the southbound on-ramp to I- 405 and Lake Washington Boulevard. Stormwater runoff from the catch basins is transmitted to the northern portion of the subject property and discharged to the northern end of the open drainage ditch, located along the eastern right of way of Lake Washington Boulevard. Stormwater from the subject property is also collected and discharged to the ditch at this location. The open ditch extends approximately 500 feet to the south where it enters a buried 24 -inch corrugated plastic pipe that flows an additional 60 feet south before discharging to May Creek. Additional drainage enters the ditch from the subject property near the entrance to the buried pipe. May creek flows into Lake Washington approximately .25 miles southwest of the subject property. (Attachment A: Existing Conditions Site Map) Graham-Buntin Associates 2 Environmental & Land Use Services Hawks Lan ft Assessment (5/12/09) 3.0 Project Description The proposal is to demolish the existing structures associated with the Pan Abode facility and utilize approximately 3.06 acres of the subject property for construction of a 5 story, 122,000 square foot, 173 room hotel. The proposed Hawks Landing Crowne Plaza Hotel will consist of • One level of underground parking with approximately 107 stalls • Ground floor hotel reception area with meeting rooms and approximately 742 square feet, 2,152 square feet, and 3,360 square feet for retail, spa and restaurant facilities respectively • Four levels of guestrooms • A total of approximately 126 surface level parking stalls, including five spaces designated for Neighborhood Electric Vehicles (NEVs)) • Two access points along Lake Washington Boulevard • Storm water facilities including rain gardens • Sanitary sewer, water and other utilities Preliminary designs indicate that the hotel will maintain a maximum height of 60 feet. Required land use permits include site plan review, environmental review pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), building permits and a street vacation. All development including required infrastructure will be located a minimum of 277 feet landward of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of May Creek. (Attachment B. Proposed Conditions) 4.0 Ustiing Information The subject property has been addressed under a number of existing studies. These information sources have been reviewed and synthesized to assist GBA in characterizing the subject property. The sources are summarized as follow: 4.1 National wedand The National Wetland Inventory (NWI) is compiled by the U.S. Department of interior's Fish and Wildlife Service. NWI relies upon visual aerial photo interpretation of wetland indicators including hydrologic, vegetation and topographic signatures. NWI does not identify wetlands within the vicinity of the subject property. It should be recognized however; that the forest canopy associated with the riparian corridor of May Creek would likely obscure the indicators upon which NWI relies. GBA utilize NWl only as a generalized reap indication of the possible Grahwn-BMMLng Associates 3 Environmental & Land Use Services Hawks_Landing Assessment 5/12109) — - L_. presence and extent of wetlands. Reconnaissance and delineation procedures are always based on an on-site assessment. 4.2 Soil Survey of King County, Area Washington The Soil Survey is compiled by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and includes mapped soil units registered to detailed descriptions of soil characteristics. The survey identifies one soil unit within the subject property boundaries. The map unit appears to include the entire floodplain associated with lower May Creek. No -Norma sandy loam is a poorly drained soil typically found on floodplains with slopes between 0 and 2 percent. The parent material is alluvium. Minor components include Seattle, Tukwila and Shalcar soils. Norma sandy loam is listed as a hydric soil under criteria 1., 2. b) (3) and 3. 1. All Histosols except folists 2. Soil in Aquic suborders, great groups, or subgroups, Albolls suborder, Aquisalids, Pachic subgroups, or Cumulic subgroups that are: b) poorly drained or very poorly drained and have either: (3) water table equal. to 1.0 feet from the surface during the growing season if permeability is less than 6.0 inches/hour in any layer within 20 inches, 3. Soils that are frequently podded for long duration or very long duration during the growing season. Figure 4 - Soil Survey http : Hwcbsoil survl cy. runs .usda. �ov/app 4.3 May Creek Basin Action Plan Wril 200 1) The May Creek Basin Action Plan was funded by King Courcy and the City of Renton outlines a set of actions addressing the threat of flooding, facilitation of stormwater conveyance to stabilize stream banks and reduce erosion, protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water quality. The plan is intended to prevent existing problems within the basin from becoming worse in the GrahamBuntin Associates 4 Environmental & Land Use Services Hawks Lan&wjzAssessment (5112109) future. The plan provides baseline information relating to conditions in the basin including a map sheet reflecting the approximate location and extent of wetlands. It is noteworthy that the wetland map identifies a small wetland in the vicinity of the drainage ditch described under existing conditions. 4.4 Biolo ical Assessment: Barbee Mill Prelimina Plat (August 2002 Racdke Associates, Inc. prepared a Biological Assessment (BA) consistent with the requirements of the Endangered Species Act to evaluate potential effects of the proposed subdivision on federal and state listed species. The BA includes a characterization of May Creek and Lake Washington, documents species use, and identifies mitigating conditions to ameliorate project generated impacts to listed species. The Barbee Mill development is located just west of Lake Washington Boulevard adjacent to the subject property. 4.5 Wetland Delineation Report: Fawcett PE9MM (December 2000) Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. prepared a Wetland Delineation Report addressing a portion of the area located south of the subject property. While the contiguous area south of the subject property is under the ownership of Dr. Greg Fawcett, the delineation focused only on the area south of May Creek. The report includes observations relating to May Creek and hydrology, soil and vegetation within the riparian corridor. 4,6 Forest Practice Activity Map The Washington State Department of Natural Resources maps and classifies waters of the state pursuant to WAC 222-16-031 on the Forest Practice Stream Type Maps. The maps were reviewed to assist in characterizing the project area. May Creek is identified as an S (Shoreline) Water of the State. Type S waters are defined as: "All waters, within their bankfuii width, as inventoried as `shorelines of the state' under chapter 90.58 RCW and the rules promulgated pursuant to chapter 90.58 RCW including periodically inundated areas of their associated wetlands. No additional Waters of the State were identified on the Stream Type Maps, 5.0 Stream Study May Creek originates from the outlet of Lake Kathleen and flows westerly approximately 8.6 miles to Lake Washington. The May Creek watershed drains approximately 14 square miles of residential, open space, agricultural, commercial, industrial and public infrastructure development including runoff from 1-405. The stream reach located south of the subject property lies between the 1405 bridge crossing in the cast and the Lake Washington Boulevard bridge crossing in the west. This reach of May Creek is identified as Reach B and characterized in the City of Renton Draft Shoreline Inventory and Analysis as relatively unuttered (Renton Draft Shoreline Inventory, November 2008) 5.1 Riparian Functions Observations gathered during our site investigation, conducted during the early spring of 2009, indicate a high level of in stream and riparian corridor functions. The stream is low gradient (< 8%) and displays a complex of low velocity pools mixed with swifter moving riffles and runs. In stream structure is provided by naturally recruited large woody debris (LAID) consisting of native deciduous species and installed habitat features including anchored root wads and cabled logs. Riparian functions are closely linked to vegetation along the stream bank and adjacent floodplain. Grahain-Buntingjssociaies 5 Environmental & Land Use Services Hawks LandiM Assessment 5/12/09 LWD Recruitment - While large conifers are generally the preferred source of LWD, the presence of mature deciduous species throughout the stream reach provides an ongoing source for recruitment of woody material into the stream. LWD promotes complexity within the stream and provides holding areas for salmonids and resident fish species. Bank Stability -- The three strata vegetation community along the riparian corridor promotes bank stability through establishment of deep root systems. The anchored roots help hold the sandy loam of the floodplain intact and minimize the forces of erosion, sedimentation and increased turbidity. Reed canarygrass, often viewed as an undesirable species, is very effective in promoting bank stabilization. Unfortunately it also may colonize aggressively reducing the diversity of native plant species. Shade - The deciduous tree canopy provides shade during low flow summer months and helps to maintain cool temperatures and maintain dissolved oxygen levels required by salmonids and resident fish species. Water Quality - Emergent vegetation including vigorous communities of reed canarygrass contiguous to the OHWM provide for the filtering of sediments and pollutants. Reed canarygrass is viewed as an invasive species; however, its dense mat like quality provides an excellent filtering function that helps prevent delivery of sediments and pollutants to receiving waters. Fish and Wildlife Habitat — While no salmonids or resident fish species were observed during our site investigation, May Creek is reportedly utilized by Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), Coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and Sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) salmon. Winter steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and cutthroat trout (Salmo clarki clarki) are also known to utilize the creek. (Renton Draft Shoreline Inventory, November 2008). Puget Sound Chinook salmon and Puget Sound steelhead are listed as threatened under the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia Coho salmon are listed as a candidate species under ESA. May Creek does not have a self sustaining Chinook run. Chinook observed in May Creek are likely strays from the Cedar River (Lucchette 2002). Coho are known to utilize Lake Washington and May Creek. Coho runs in Lake Washington are heavily influenced by hatchery production (Raedeke 2002). Puget Sound Steelhead have utilized May Creek on a historic basis and may remain present in depressed munbers (Salrnonscape 2009). A Graham-BunhM Associates 6 E_ rr_vironmental & Land Use Services Hawks Landing Assessment 5112/09 review of pertinent literature relating to lake Washington salmonid stocks indicates a high degree of uncertainty as to the genetic origins of salmonids utilizing May Creek. it is possible that individuals from the Puget Sound and Puget Sound Strait of Georgia Evolutionary Significant Units (ESUs) utilize the habitat provided by the creek. The riparian area provides excellent feeding and cover habitat for birds, including woodland hawks and passerine species. Small mammals such as voles utilize uplands within the riparian area for burrowing. GBA observed blacktail deer (Odocodeus hemionus columbianus) droppings and hoof prints within the riparian corridor. Common snipe (Capella gallinago) were flushed during several site inspections at a location near the bridge crossing at lake Washington Boulevard. A short tailed weasel (Mustela ermines) was also observed burrowing in the rip rap near the bridge abutment. A pair of Osprey (Pandion haliatus) was observed perched on a nest platform near the mouth of May Creek. Additional species were observed during our site investigation including: song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus) black -capped chickadee (Poecile atricapilla) hairy woodpecker (Picoides villosus) spotted towhee (Pipilo maculates) winter wren (Troglodytes troglodytes) mallard hen and drake (Anas platyrhynchos) unidentified buteo (Buteo sp.) American crow (Corvus hrachyrhynchos) gull species (Larus sp.) 5.2 Ordinary High Water Mark GBA reviewed the location of the OHWM as identified and flagged in the field by David Evans Associates (DEA) in 2006 and Sound Development Group (SDG) in 2009. The guidance contained in the statutory definition was utilized in confirming the location of the OHWM. "The Ordinary high water mark on all lakes, streams and tidal water is that mark that will be found by examining the beds and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continues in all ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation as that condition exists on June 1, 1971 or as it may naturally change thereafter-, PROVIDED, that in any area where the ordinary high water mark cannot be found, the ordinary high water mark adjoining salt water shall be the line of mean higher high tide and the ordinary high water mark adjoining fresh water shall be the lute of mean high, water." In addition, the definition contained in the Renton Municipal Code under 4-11-010 was also considered. Review was aided by a series of high water events occurring during the late winter and early spring of 2009. These one to two year flows generally correlated with the physical evidence observed along the bank of the creek. The OHWM was identified based on scour and drift lines, sediment deposits, topographic features and vegetation transitions located at or near the top of the right bank. It was not deemed necessary to adjust any of the flags placed previously by DEA and SDG. The OHWM as flagged was surveyed and is depicted on the map sheets accompanying this report. Graham -Bunting Associates 7 Environmental & Land Use Services Hawks LandingAssessment (5,12109) 5.3 Stream Classification and Regulations The City's Critical Area Regulations RMC 4-3-050 classify May Creek as a Class 1 water. Class 1 Waters are perennial salmon bearing waters classified by the City and State as Shorelines of the State. Subsection L. Streams and Lakes: 1. Applicability/Lands to Which These Regulations Apply stipulates that the City's critical area regulations do not apply to Class 1 waters which are regulated by RMC 4-3-490, Shoreline Master Program Regulations. Subsection 4-3-490, 5, d, establishes the standard setback for commercial development as follows: "A commercial building should be located no closer than fifty (50) to the ordinary high water mark; however, the Land Use Hearing Examiner may reduce this requirement through the variance process for good reason for those structures that allow public access to and along the waters edge." All development related to the proposed Hawk's Landing Crowne Plaza Hotel will be located a minimum of 248 feet landward of the OHWM of May Creek, The subject proposal is located outside of the 200 -foot jurisdictional area of the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) and the City's Shoreline Master Program (SMP) and is therefore compliant with the required 50 -foot setback requirement. The drainage ditch located predominantly within the right of way of Lake Washington Boulevard was also assessed in light of the City's Critical Area Regulations and identified as a class 5 water. RMC 4-3-050 L, Streams and Lakes: 1. a. v. (a) (b) establishes the criteria for Class 5 waters as follows: "v. Class 5. Class 5 waters are non-regulated non salmonid -bearing waters which meet one or more of the foiiowing criteria: (a) Flow within an artificially constructed channel where no naturally defined channel had previously existed; and or (b) Are a surficially isolated water body less than one-half (0.5) acre (e.g. pond) not meeting the criteria for a wetland as defined in subsection M. of this section." Graham BunfingAssociates 8 Environmental & Land Use Services Hawks Landing Assessment f5/12109) GBA conferred on site with the Area Habitat Biologist froze the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) on April 24, 2009 who provided the following observations and guidance: • The ditch is a man made feature • Work within the ditch itself will not require Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) from WDFW • Work on the outfall to May Creek would require an HPA • Any proposed improvement to the outfall should prevent entry of fish to the ditch Based on observations gathered during our site investigation and consultation with the Area Habitat Biologist, GBA have determined that the drainage ditch is a non -salmon bearing water. The location and profile of the ditch indicate that it is an artificially constructed channel designed and actively maintained to convey stormwater runoff from I-405, bake Washington Boulevard and the Pan Abode facility. GBA have determined that the drainange ditch satisfies Criteria (a) as a Class 5 Water and is therefore not regulated under the City's Critical Area Regulations. The ditch will be discussed further under the following Wetland Study. 6.0 Wetland Study The following discussion addresses the procedures and methods utilized in our wetland investigation and provides a summary of our findings. 6.1 MethodoloQv GBA utilized the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology 1997) which is a revised version of the 1987 Co1ps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Technical Report Y-87-1) in the preparation of this report. The Ecology Manual (along with the recent Corps of Engineers regional supplement, April 2008) represents the accepted standard for identifying and delineating wetlands for jurisdictional purposes under the Clean Water Act. GBA considered the new interim regional supplement in the assessment of field data. The Ecology manual has been adopted for use by the City of Renton for use in conjunction with the Growth Management Act mandated Critical Areas Ordinance. Both the Ecology and Corps manuals incorporate the Clean Water Act Definition of Wetlands as follows: "Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support and that under normal circumstances do support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs and similar areas." The City's Critical Areas Ordinance stipulates additional defining elements as follows: "Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands created from non -wetland sites, including but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street or highway. Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non -wetland areas created to mitigate conversion of wetlands." Graham -Bunting: associates 9 Environmental & Land Use Services Hawky Landing .Assessment(5/1 2,109 The definition requires that three interrelated defining elements or parameters be established when identifying wetlands. These parameters are wetland hydrology, hydric soils and hydrophytic vegetation. Wetland Hydrology Water is the driving force, which creates and sustains wetlands. The 1987 Manual and subsequent Corps guidance identifies wetlands as areas where soils are inundated or continuously saturated for a minimum of 5% of the growing season (approximately 12.5 days for Western Washington). When direct observation of the water table cannot be made, hydrology is determined by relying upon hydrologic indicators such as hydric soil characteristics, water marks, drift lines, sediment deposits or drainage patterns_ Hydric Soils Wetlands exhibit hydric soils. These are soils which are saturated, flooded or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions. These are conditions where no free oxygen is present in the upper soil horizons. Typical field indicators of hydric soils are the presence of a thick organic layer, or in predominantly mineral soils such as found on this site, a low chroma matrix (gray color) and/or bright mottling, Soil chroman are determined by comparing soil samples with color chips in the Munsell Color Charts. Hydrophytic Vegetation The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has classified wetland vegetation according to its frequency of occurrence in wetlands: Obligate wetland species (OBL) occur in wetlands greater than 99% of the time. Facultative wetland species (FACW) occur in wetlands greater than 67% of the time. Facultative species (FAC) occur in wetlands 34°/u-66% of the time. Facultative upland species (FACU) occur in wetlands less than 34% of the time. Upland species (UPL) occur in wetlands less than 1% of the time. Generally the hydrophytic vegetation parameter is satisfied when greater than 50% of the species present at a data collection point have an indicator status of OBL, FACW and/or FAC; when two or more dominant species have observed morphological or known physiological adaptations for' occurrence in wetlands; or when other indicators of hydrophytic vegetation are present. 6.2 Findings GBA conducted the site investigation on March 23, April 8, April 14 and April 24, 2009. Observations were collected over a period of a month during weather conditions that transitioned from cold and wet to sunny and seasonable. Little plant growth was noted during our initial site visit, however, by mid April plants were exhibiting active growth. Indian plum, salmonberry and elderberry were rapidly leafing out and Japanese knotweed colonies along the bank of May Creek was emerging from dormant rhizomes. GBA consider the timing and weather conditions of our investigation to be optimal for the identification of wetlands. Two areas were investigated: 1) The subject property (Pan Abode facility) and its perimeter including the drainage ditch along Lake Washington Boulevard. and; 2) The floodplain south of the subject property to the right (north) bank of May Creek. Both areas were traversed and visually inspected for indications of wetland hydrology and hydrophytic vegetation. The ordinary high water mark of the drainage ditch was identified and flagged on site. A single data point (DP - 7) was established along the top of the bank. A second data point (DP -2) was assessed just east of the ditch along the southern boundary of the subject property. Three rough transects were established in an east/west aspect between May Creek and the subject property. Six data points Graham-Buntin Associates 10 Environmental & Land Use Services Hawks Landing Assessment (5/12`09) (DPs 1,3,4,5,6,8) were assessed in the floodplain or riparian corridor of May Creek. Soil evaluation pits were excavated to a uniform depth of 21 inches. Hydrology, soil and vegetation were assessed at each data point. Data collected on site was recorded on data forms and field notes. Photographs documented appropriate visual images. Data collected is summarized in the following table. (Attachment C: Wetland Field Data Forms) 6.3 Data Sgmm4W Table DP Oggy Soil Dominant Vegetation Status *oxidized *sandy loam 2.5Y *Populus balsamifera FAC (20%) rhizospheres - 412 - rhizospheres - Alnus rubra FAC (20%) 1 fac neutral - sandy redox Cornus stolonifera FACW (50%) Wet geomorphic Carex obnupta OBL (800/9) position no indicators gravelly loam - *Alnus rubra FAC (2%) 2 l OYR 4/3 Rubus discolor FACU (251/o) Up Phalaris arundinacea FACW (951/6) no indicators silt loam - IOYR Populus balsamifera FAC (30%) 3 3/3 Rubus discolor FACU (100%) U no indicators silt loam I OYR 313 *Populus balsamifera FAC (10%) 4 Alnus rubra FAC (10%) Up Phalarls arundinacea FACW (1000%) no indicators silty clay loam Alnus rubra FAC (600/6) 5 IOYR 2/2 Rubus discolor FACU (100%) U *water table @ 8" *silty clay loam *Alnus rubra FAC (60%) 6 - saturated to 2.5Y 3/1 - 10% Rubus discolor FACU (60%) Wet surface mottles 7.5YR 4/6 Rubus s ectabilis FAC (301)/o) Saturation @ 15" gravelly silt loam *Populus balsamifera FAC (80%) 7 10YR 212 Rubus discolor FACU (20%) Up Rununculus re ens FACW (5% saturation below sandy loam 2.5 Y *Alnus rubra FAC (201/o) 8 20" 4/4 .Rubus discolor FACU (20%) Up Cornus stolons era FACW (201/) *Wetland parameter satisfied 6.4 Data Digest Based on the above data summarized above, two regulated wetlands were identified: Wetlands A and B are small depressional wetlands located within the floodplain of May Creek with areas of 433 and 481 square feet respectively. The wetlands receive their hydraulic charge from a seasonal high water table, precipitation and periodic overbank flooding of May Creek. The wetlands are distinguished from the surrounding uplands because they are distinct topographic features, exhibit saturated soils and are dominated by hydrophytic vegetation. Wetland A is a deep depression with observable hydrology at the soil surface. Soil displays a very dark matrix chroma accompanied by mottles. Vegetation is dominated by a mix of facultative plant species. Wetland B is a gentler depression which exhibits only secondary indicators of wetland hydrology with saturation present well below the soil surface. Soil is sandier and lighter by comparison and vegetation includes a vigorous community of slough sedge (OBL). In addition to Wetlands A and B, the drainage ditch along Lake Washington Boulevard was also assessed in accordance with the wetland identification/delineation methodology. Although a data Graham -Bunting Associates 11 Errvironmental & Land Use Services Hawks Landing Assessment (51121'09) point was not assessed within the ditch itself, the area within the flagged DHWM was determined to satisfy wetland parameters. Standing water was present in much of the 500 linear foot ditch. Soil was silty and likely consists of stormwater sediment from surrounding development. Vegetation is dominated by reed canarygrass. Data point 7, established at the top of bank approximately 20 feet west of the existing Pan Abode facility was assessed to characterize the area lying between the ditch and subject property. No surface water was observed although saturation was present at a depth of approximately 15 inches from the soil surface. Soil consisted of a gravely silt loam, possibly fill from the development of the Pan Abode facility. The soil exhibited a dark matrix chroma (IOYR 212) but was not accompanied by redoximorphic features. The subsoil was a very light silty sand (2.5Y 6f6). Vegetation was dominated by a mix of facultative trees, shrubs and herbs. Because the hydrology and soil parameters were not satisfied the data point was determined to be upland. 6.5 Wetland Classifi tion and R ations Wetlands A and B were classified in accordance with the criteria contained under Subsection 4-3- 050 M. 1. a. ii. of the City's Critical Area Regulations as Category 2 wetlands. Category 2 wetlands are wetlands that meet one of the criteria listed under (a) through (d). Wetlands A and B were found to satisfy criteria (d) below: "(d) Wetlands having minimum existing evidence of human related physical alteration such a diking ditching or channelization... " The majority of the floodplain, including Wetlands A and B, located landward of the right bank of May Creek and south of the subject property has not been subject to human related alteration. The wetlands contribute to the riparian functions discussed under the stream study earlier in this report including LWD recruitment, bank stability, shade, water quality and fish and wildlife habitat. The wetlands functional value, however are limited by their small size which represents a combined area of only 914 square feet in a floodplain parcel totaling over 110,000 square feet. RMC 4-3-050 M. 6. c. establishes the standard buffer width required for Category 2 Wetlands at 50 feet. Required buffers are to be maintained in their natural condition. Buffers are required to be measured from the wetland boundary as surveyed in the field. Wetland A and B are located offsite 117.4 and 63.8 feet south of the subject property respectively. The area between the Graham-Buntin associates U Environmental & Lana Use Services Hawks Lq ding Assessment (5112109) wetlands and the property line remains in a natural condition and is vegetated primarily with native species_ RMC 4-3-050 M. 1. c. i_ establishes the basis for regulated and non regulated wetlands as follows: "i. Regulated and Nonregulated Wetlands — General: Wetlands created or restored as a part of a mitigation project are regulated wetlands. Regulated wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland sites for purposes other than wetland mitigation, including, but not limited to irrigation and drainage ditches, grass lined swales, canals detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm pond, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July 1, 1490, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street or highway. The department administrator shall determine that a wetland is not regulated on the basis of photographs, statements or other evidence." GBA followed the guidance provided above in assessing the regulatory status of the drainage ditch. The following findings were considered: • The Pan Abode facility was constructed on a fill pad during the mid 1950s • The fill pad appears to extend to a point near the road right of way at the top of ditch • The soil profile assessed at data point 7 displays rock typical of pit run commonly utilized as a fill base • The 2:1 bank profile of the ditch is typical of an excavated stormwater conveyance facility • The hydrology that charges the ditch is composed primarily of stormwater runoff from I- 405, Lake Washington Boulevard and the Pan Abode facility • Unaltered areas within the floodplain south of the subject property do not include natural linear features similar to the ditch • National Wetland Inventory does not identify the ditch as a wetland Based on the above findings GBA determined that the drainage ditch was intentionally created from a nonwedand site for the purpose of stormwater conveyance and is therefore a nonregulated wetland under the City's Critical Area Regulations. While the wetland may not be regulated by the City, the U.S_ Army Corps of Engineers and/or Washington State Department of Ecology may assume jurisdiction over the wetland. 7.0 Regulatory Summary/Mitigation Measures The following buffers and setback requirements are registered to proposed project actions: 7.1 May Creek May Creek is a shoreline of the state regulated under the Shoreline Management Act and the City of Renton's Shoreline Master Program. The area of jurisdiction under the SMA and SMP extends two hundred feet landward of the OHWM. The closest point of proposed project actions to the OHWM is 277 feet_ The setback for commercial buildings from May Creek is currently established under the SMP at 50 feet. The subject property itself is located entirely outside of the required shoreline setback area. The mature deciduous forest located on the parcel south of the subject property varies in width from 64 feet in the west to 235 feet in the east and provides a full range of protective functions (see subsection 5.1 Riparian Functions). Because the riparian corridor is outside of the Graham-Buntin-eAssociates 13 Environmental & Land Use Services Hawks LandinAssessment 5112109 subject property boundaries and is not owned by the applicant, GBA have refrained from characterizing the area as a buffer. 7.2 Drainage Ditch The drainage ditch is classified as a Class 5 water. It is a non regulated non salmon bearing water within an artificially constructed channel where no naturally defined channel previously existed. 7.3 Wetlands A and B Wetlands A and B are Category 2 Wetlands which require 50 foot buffers. Both wetlands are located offsite south of the subject property. Wetland A is 117.4 feet south of the subject property boundary and Wetland B is 63.8 feet south of the subject property. The area between the wetlands and the subject property consists of a mature deciduous forest. Although the uplands surrounding the wetlands are not characterized as buffers, the deciduous forest provides a high level of buffer functions. 7.4 Drainage Ditch The drainage ditch is a nonregulated wetland created from a nonwetland site for the purpose of conveying stormwater. 7.5 Water Quality In addition to the distance of project actions from the regulated stream and wetlands, rain gardens are proposed in conjunction with the project's drainage plan. The site will be designed consistent with the King County Storm Water Design Manual guidelines for stormwater management. It is anticipated that the water quality of drainage leaving the site will represent an improvement over the existing conditions associated with the aging Pan Abode facility. 8.0 Closure GBA employed currently accepted methods of delineating wetlands and characterizing aquatic features on the site. In addition we utilized the guidance provided in the City of Renton's Critical Area Regulations and Shoreline Master Program in identifying appropriate regulatory requirements. Consultation with the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife was conducted to determine fish use of May Creels and the drainage ditch and to determine potential hydraulic project approval requirements. The findings and conclusions rendered in this report, however, represent our best professional opinion. Concurrence should be obtained from agencies of jurisdiction prior to initiating Iand use actions or construction. The reportwill also provide a sufficient source of information in the event that a jurisdictional determination is requested from the Corps of Engineers. PIease call either Patricia Bunting or myself with any questions relating to this report. Sincerely; Oscar Graham Principal EcoIogist/Project Lead _Graham-BuntrngAssoclates 1.4 Hawks Landin Jssessment (51121"09) 4J -bc- Patricia Bunting Wetland Ecologist/PWS Environmental & Land Use Services 9.0 References Associated Earth Sciences, Inc., December 7, 2000. Wetland Delineation Report Fawcett Property; Renton, WA. Cowardin L., V. Carter, F. Golet, E. LaRoe, 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Hitchcock C.L. and A. Cronquist, 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle, 730 pp. King County, April 2001. May Creek Basin Action Plan. Munsell Color, 1994 revised, Munsell Soil Color Charts. Kollmorgen Instruments Corp., Baltimore, MD. Pcjar J. and A. MacKinnon, 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast Washuz ton, Oregon. British Columbia & Alaska.. Lone Pine Publishing, Vancouver B. C., 528 pp, Raedke Associates, Inc., August 26, 2002. Biological Assessment, Barbee Mill Preliminary Plat, Reed, PB, Jr. National List of Plant Species that occur in Wetlands; Northwest (Region 9) National Wetlands Inventory, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88 (28.9) 89 pp. Renton Draft Shoreline Inventory, November 2008, Sound Development Group, LLC, April 28, 2009. Technical Infonwtion Report; Hawks Landing — Crowne Plaza Hotel. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2008. Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region, ed. J. S. Wakeley, R.W.. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR -08-13. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Vepraskas, Mike. Technical Bulletin 301, 1999. Redoximorphic Features for Identifying Aquic Conditions: North Carolina State University, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences33 pp. Washington State Department of Ecology, March 1997, Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, Ecology Publication 496-94. Washington State Department of Natural Resources Forest Practice Activity Map, 11th:/IRL��Y.C�11r.11�.a0�1B1151E1CSS�U'It111tS/T[) ics�'FolestPracticesA l��ic_ations Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, llttpfi w fv" %�a.govhijaplij = salnlol'i c Personal Communications Fisher, Larry. Area Habitat Biologist, Washington State Department of Fisheries. On site discussion relating to drainage ditch along Lake Washington Blvd. April 24, 2009. Severin, Pat P.E. Project Engineer, Sound Development Group. Project Meetings March through May 12, 2009. Graham-Buntine Associates 15 Environmental & Land Use Services Hawks Landfn ,4ssessment 5/I2109 "6 y A to w - - vBtj PILI ____NSR _ RAILRO l � _ Xa { 741 Rl In CR 19 14 ILA 1 To - r1 o - r G _ In 19 � � ! � t �l �L�} I `- � 7 I 1�Y IFS -_ � �'- - '3� /� S°J fr l•�` 4�k � �o � � + 717-i' �_•" a - � Y� � ! Ji o a4 E> g xaaok+ Q • Yr ��y / ul C--lz f0 T � N I ! / n' a y m A C6 x`zc� Q y• Y A aCIDCD p C? � Cl 1 C) CDC F; It0 rLn z % O � Q O 12 � as a mC >_ R o QQ Wetland Field Data Forms Attachment C WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Supplement to the 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual Project Site: Hawks Landing,Crowne Plaza hotel Sampling Date: 3123109 Applicant/Omer: Hawks Landing, LLC Sampling Point: DP -1 Investigator: Pat/Oscar/Jerarn City/County: Renton/ in Section, Township, Range: S29 T24N R5E State: WA Landform (hlllslope, terrace, etc) Floodplain Slope (%) 0-1 Local relief (concave, convex, none) Concave Subregion (LRR) A Lai y' . t? - Long -. ! [ ? , t 14� i Datum Soil Map Unit Name- No, Norma NWI classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? X Yes ❑ No (N no, explain in remarks.) Are 'Normal Circumstances' present on the site? X Yes ❑ No 3. Are Vegetation Q. Soil, ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? No Are Vegetation ❑, Soil, ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) LUMFOPHIT OF VINt]INUS - Atm.c.n aim map snowing sampling nt locations, transects, imE2rtant features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? � Yes ❑ No is this Sampling Point within a Wetland? � Yes 0 No Hydric Soils Present? Yes 0 No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Remarks r T&-5' r 7`/. �1' i s ��r �� �� - �J �r; t'ffl k �/��y�� i`f; 749Y� &f u raFreTinu _ I lee �.:a..r:ti. .....,... ..s ..r .... Tree Stratum (Piot sizeo0� Absolute % Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Cover Species? Status -,f, Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) z. d4 C., 3. Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4. (e) N = Til Coves PeroLnt of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AIB) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 10 R R_) -`�Q 5en r D [5 Prevalence Index Worksheet Total 90 o r f Multiply t?V 2. 08L species x1= 4. FACW species x2= FAC species x3= S = Total Cover FACU species x4= UPL species x 5 = Herb trabum (Plot sine 5 ft R ) Column totals (A) B 1. Prevalence Index = B 1 A = 2. 3. 4. Hydrqphytic Vegetation Indicators 5. Dominance test is > 50 B- Prevalence test is 5 3.0 " ?' Morphological Adaptations * (provide supporting data in remarks or on a separate sheet) 8: 9_ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation * (explain) 11. ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be =Total Craver present,unless disturbed or problematic Woodv Vine Strahrm Plot size Hydrophytic Vegetation Yes No Present? ❑ 1. 2. Notal Cover °% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: 174/Itl l•I C,rrfri ',`> US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - interim Version SOIL HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Profile Descri on; Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators. Depth Matrix Redox Features inches Color moist % Calor moist 'A TypelLoe Texture Remarks io 3/ all that apply): Secwrddry Indketors (2 or more required): Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Water�tairhed Leaves (139) (MCRA 1, 2,411A 3 4E3) Water-Stainedl-eaves (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A & 4B) (B9) Drainage Patterns (B1t1) Salt Crust(B11) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) Saturation Vasibie on Aerial Imagery (CO) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Geomorphic position (D2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Shallow Aquitard (03) Presence of Reduced Norte (C4) FAC�leutral Test (D5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (08) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) StUnt9d of Stressed Plants (131) (LRR A) Frost -Heave Hummocks Other (explain in remarks) -ID b ❑ ❑ ❑ Field Observations 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains zLoc: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix ric Soll Indicators. (Applicable to all LRRs nlth ess oerwise noted.) ❑ Histosol indicators fo► ProblemWc Hydric Soils' (A7) Sandy Redox (S5) ElHistic Epipedon ❑ 2cm Muck (Al U) (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (SB) ElBlack Histic ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) (A3) © Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MCRA 1) ❑ Other (explain in remarks) ElHydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ ❑ Depleted Bekyw Dark Surface (A11) 11De*ted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (FB) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) El Depleted Depleted Dark Surface ( ) 3 Indicsators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. unless disturbed or probleatic m Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54) Redox Depressions (Fe) Restrictive Laver (if nresent): Type. Yes No Hydric Boll present? Depth (inches): Remarks: 4�y�(lrn. �G* IYtGCCl. L l�c Cty 11`JI'rJl;r���c vx ��rlr�C, ��� k ec Z. H�fa-9r� �CtGfi C-�_7c/ .1� f?j1S QCG AZIEf , ��jL 7 5at";'y11-11-'�;' /kW Chno'- edi" HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: !'rimary Indicators (minimum of orre required: Surface wafer (Ai) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Sediment Deposits (132) Drift Deposits (133) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Iron Deposits (B5) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Check ❑ all that apply): Secwrddry Indketors (2 or more required): Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Water�tairhed Leaves (139) (MCRA 1, 2,411A 3 4E3) Water-Stainedl-eaves (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A & 4B) (B9) Drainage Patterns (B1t1) Salt Crust(B11) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) Saturation Vasibie on Aerial Imagery (CO) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Geomorphic position (D2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Shallow Aquitard (03) Presence of Reduced Norte (C4) FAC�leutral Test (D5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (08) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) StUnt9d of Stressed Plants (131) (LRR A) Frost -Heave Hummocks Other (explain in remarks) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Field Observations Surface Water Present? Yes Water Table Present? Yes Saturation Present? ❑ Yes (includes capillary fringe) No Depth (In): r No Depth (in): 2.CJ Na Depth (in): '7 Z Wetland Hydrologtr Present? Yes No ❑ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if availabie:� Remarks: t!,l%� V�l� �GG� C �'. % !?.O:��i�(:•}.�` �� C1i1! ,`�!'-�C�1? ?�� �'t�iG�.fi.� -' t US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, vatleys, and Coast —Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Supplement to the 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual Project Site: Hawks Landing, Crowne Plaza Hotel Sampling Date: 4/$109 Applicant Owner: Hawks Landing, LLC Sampling Point: DP -2 investigator. Pat/Oscar/Jerom City/County: Renton/Kin Section, Township, Range- S29 T24N R5E State: WA Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc) C,, ,nor . , (• a 1 �� ..� Slope {%) r Local relief (concave, convex, none} ? Subregion (LRR) A Let 47.5338 Long —122.19487 Dakum Soil Map Unit Name No, Norma NWI classification: None Are Gimaticlhydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? I X I Yes ❑ I No (If no, explain in remarks.) Are"Normal Circumstances" present on the site? I X I Yes ❑ 1 No Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Are Vegetation ❑, Soil, 0, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? No Are Vegetation ❑, Soil, ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling int locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F71-1 No Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland? 0 Yes No Hydric Soils Present? ❑ Yes No Wettand Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes No Remarks. VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 ft R „ _ t Absolute % Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Cover S 'es7 Status i' % r Number of dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2, 3. Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4. TT_wl Cover Percent of Dominant Species �(B} that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A1B) SaplinglShrub Stratum (Plot size t0 ft R�} 1. d Prevalence Index Worksheet Total % Cov r of Mut i t OBL species x 1 = 3. 4. FACW species x2= e FAC Species x 3 = =Total Cover FACU species x4= UPL species x5 - Herb Stratum {Plot sizeS��R } Column totals (A) 13 J. "S I lail3 Prevalence Index = B / A = 2_ _L_&6&1X?TChU'"q rho 4' Hydrophytic V elation Indicators 5. Dominance test is > 50% 6. Prevalence test is _e 3.0 7' Morphological Adaptations ` (provide supporting data In remarks or on a separate sheet) B. g' Wetland Non -Vascular Plants " 10 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation ` (explain) 1 ` Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be = Total Cover VVoody Vine Stratum Plot size resent unless disturbed or problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation Yes {� No El Present? ' 1 i. 2. Total Gower % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum cemarers- US Army Corps ofEngrneers Western Mountains, Valleys. and Coast- lntenm Version SOIL Samnlina Point nQ--) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Profile Description: Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators. Depth Matrix Redox Features Calor moist % Color moist V- T Loc Texture Remarks - e -- R G— ginches r Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt crust (1311) 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 7Loc: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix drla Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all I. rrnlasa othe►wiae robed.) Indkators for Problematic Hydric SWF%3 ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5)❑ 2cm Muck (Al 0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Other (explain In remarks) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) be present, unless disturbed or pmbiematic ❑ Sandy Gl%-M Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (FB) Restrictive Laver (if oresent): Raised Ant Mounds (136) (LRR A) Tom -Yes Stunted or Stressed P(ards (Di) (LRR A) © No soil present? Depth (inches): Inundation Visible on Aerial Other (explain in remarks) 1� Remarks: L dj, C'1 .5 C)1 >/ { tr i GCi• rn ! ` ` ale HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary hxficators (minimum of one required., chWA am that apply): Secondary lnclicators (2 or more required): Surface water (A1)Sparseiy Vegetated Concave Surface (68) jal Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2,4A d 48) High Water Table (A2) Water -Stained Leaves (except MLRA 1, z, 4A A 413) (139) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt crust (1311) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Sediment Deposits (82) [] Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) FAC-Neubal Test (D5) Iron Deposits (135) Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (CB) Raised Ant Mounds (136) (LRR A) Surface Sal Cracks (B8) Stunted or Stressed P(ards (Di) (LRR A) Frost -Heave Hummocks Inundation Visible on Aerial Other (explain in remarks) Imagery (B7) Field Observations Surface Water Present? ❑ Yes Water Table Present? ❑ Yes Fe No Depth (In): No Depth (in): —7 Z4 Wsuand Y� ❑ No Saturation Present? ❑ Yes No Depth (in): ��j (Includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), tf available: illi Q�irC// I Remarks: ��jj yy �f J J � jj • US Rorty Corps of Engineers Western Mountains. Vaifeys, and Coast - Jnferfm Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM Westem Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Supplement to the 1887 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual Project Site: Hawks Landing, Crowne Plaza Hotel Sampling Date: 416109 ApplicanVOwner: Hawks Landing, LLC Sampling Point: DP -3 Investigator: Pat/OscarMerom City/County: RentonlKin Section, Township, Range: S29 T24N R5E State: WA Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc) �,t �,r ! Slope {°h) �% Local relief (concave, convex, none) Subregion (LRR) A Lat 47.5338 Long -122.19487 Datum Soil Map Unit Name No, Norma NWI classification: None Are climatic/hydrolVc conditions on the site typical for this time of year? X Yes ❑ Wo --- (If no, explain in remarks.) Are 'Normal Circumstances" present on the site? X Yes ❑ No Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: a Are Vegetation ❑, Soil, ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? No Are Vegetation ❑, Soil, 11, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? Na (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) oummmmi wr rinuim%sa—wtraon s1w eft. Hydrophytc Vegetation Present? Yes No is this Sampling Point within a Wetland? Yes Ea No Hydric Soils Present? ❑ Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes LKJ No Remarks: VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot sizea ftp`} Absolute % Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Cover Species? Status 1) ; 72, a Number of Dominant Species I that are VUL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2- 3. Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: a 4. (B) = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ( B) SaplingfShrub Stratum (Plot size 10 R R --J ', &kz VvPrevalence Index Worksheet Total Cover Multiply by OBL species x 1 = 2. 3. 4. FACW species K2= 5. FAC species x 3 = Til Cover FACU species 74 UPL species X5= Herb Stratum (Plot size 5 h R ) Column totals (A) B 1. Prevalence Index= B I A = 2. 3. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators 5. Dominance test is > 50% 6. Prevalence test is s 3.0 • 7. Morphological Adaptations • (provide supporting data in remarks or on a separate sheet) S. 9, Wetland Non -Vascular Plants ` 10, Problematic Hydrophyfic Vegetation • (explain) 11. " Indicators of hydric soil and wettend hydrology must be = Toni Cover resent unless disturbed or problematic Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size Hydrophytic Vegetation yes El No present7 1. 2. = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks:1r1`(�i.r [: J f : - f � r cif �c'� ,-�'»�� , ��•; . r� r- f. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains. Valleys, and Coast— Interim Version SOIL Samntinn Pnint np_,i HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Profile Descrl tion: Describe to the depth needetl to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators. Depth Matrix Redox Features cheek inches Color moist % Color moist % Type LW Texture Remarks b y/fo Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) Water-Stakhed Leaves (139) (MI RA 1, 2,4A a 4B) �i High Water Table (A2) Water -Stained Leaves (except 1MLRA 1, 2, 4A tk 4B) (139) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (81) 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduoed Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains ?Loc: PL=Pore Lining, MfiAatrix ric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LR Ra trnlsaa otherwise noted.) ❑ Histosol (A1) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Mabix (SG) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (except MLRA 1) Sulfide (A4) Loamy Glayed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑Depleted Matrix (F3) Indicators for Probiernatic Hydric Solis' ❑ 2cm Muck (A10) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Other (explain in remarks) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) dE03Hydrogen Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Redox Depressions (FB) aIndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Laver (if nresentl: Geomorphic Position (D2) Type Drift Deposits (83) Yes ❑ HNo Ydric aolE present? Depth (inches): Remarks: `/�G4�rv.34i%�•ial! /iG`�jG.'"i?t.i FAG -Neutral Test (D5) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary indicators (minimum of onerequired.• cheek all that apply) Secondary tndicafors (2 or mora required): Surface water (A1) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) Water-Stakhed Leaves (139) (MI RA 1, 2,4A a 4B) High Water Table (A2) Water -Stained Leaves (except 1MLRA 1, 2, 4A tk 4B) (139) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (81) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Sediment Deposits (B2) [] Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Geomorphic Position (D2) Drift Deposits (83) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Algal Mat or Crust (1114) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) FAG -Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Recant Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CB) Raised Ant Mounds (136) (LRR A) Surface Soil Cracks (66) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Frost -Heave Hummocks Inundation Visible on Aerial ❑ Other (explain in remarks) Imagery (B7) Field Observations Surface Water Present? ❑ Yes Water Table Present? ❑ Yes Saturation Present? ❑ Yes No Depth (in): r ! No Depth (in):I No Depth YYetarhd Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (in):� (includes capillary iringg) Describe Recorded Data (stream monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: /gauge, RBmarks: /. � _ /�i}�%6� I-f����r.l� %f�� �'" /�%�• US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast — Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Supplement to the 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual Project Site: Hawks Landing, Crowne Plaza Hotel Sampling Date: 418109 Applicant/Owner: Hawks Landing, LLC Sampling Point: DP -4 Investigator. Pat/Oscar/Jerom City/County: Renton/Kin Section, Township, Range: S29 T24N R5E State: WA Landform (hillsiope, terrace, etc) {, } p. , n,� :i Slope (%) Local retief(concave, convex, none) I�aJi Subregion (LRR) A r F Lat 47.5338 Long —122.19487 Datum Soil Map Unit Name No, Norma INWI classification: None Are dimaticthydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? I X I Yes ❑ No (if no, explain in remarks.) Are 'Normal Circumstances" present on the site? I X I Yes ❑ No Are Vegetation ❑, Soil, ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? No 4, Are Vegetation ❑, Soil, ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling int locations, transects, Important features, etc, Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland? 0 Yes ANO Hydric Soils Present? © Yes M No Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes EM No Remarks: VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 ft R y Absolute % Dominant Cover Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet t. l ft #`,QJkIr Number afDominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: {A} 2' ill fit . 8 / p 3. Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (6) 4, Sapling/ShrubStratum {Plot size Qft R,_„j = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species that are 4BL, FACW, or FAC: �� (A/13) t. Prevalence Index Worksheet Total Cover of Multiply by OBL species x 1 = 2. 3. 4- FACW species x 2 = 5. FAC species x3= Herb Stratum (Plot size 5 ft R } = Total Cover FACU species X4= UPL species X5= Column totals (A} g 1- !f CI�1GGl9Girlil>Yc°G 'L.`_ Prevalence Index = 6 /A = 2. 3. 4• Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators 5. Dominance test is > 50% 6. Prevalence test Is s 3.0 " 7. Morphological Adaptations' (provide supporting data in remarks or on a separate sheet) e• g. Wetland NorrVasmIar Plants" 10. Problematic H ro yd phytic Vegetation ` (explain) 11. • Indicators of hydric soll and wetland hydrology must be presentunless disturbed or emblematic w Vine Stratum Plot size Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Yes No Present? ❑ 7. 2• i = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: U;�. i•�f,e .�r_� �i�-¢ r �l jC�f.C-f.��f.! i;... ���'�I��GT i j FLf� �. US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valleys, and Coast- Interim Version SOIL HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Profile Descrl on: Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators. Primary Indicators (minimum of one requlrerf Surface water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Sediment Deposits (132) Drift Deposits (133) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Iron Deposits (65) Surface Soil Cracks (BB) Inundation Visible on Aerial Depth Matrix Redox Features Imagery (BT) inches Color(moist) % Color moist % T Loe Texture Remarks Yes Yes Yes No Depth (in): No Depth (in): No f j f Depth (in): 7� f Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ No F o Describe Recorded ata (slraani gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: f c tit Remarks: 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains loc: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hy dote Soil Indicatoarf; (Applicable to all LR Rs unless otherwbe noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils' Histosol (A1) ElSandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (Se) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Hlstic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Other (explain in remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) I00F331 ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted MaMx (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) E)Redox Dark Surface (FB) S Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) be present, unless disturbed or problematic ❑ Sandy Guyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (FB) Restrictive Laver (if uresentl: Type. Hydric Boll present? Yes ❑ No Depth (inches): ,Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one requlrerf Surface water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Sediment Deposits (132) Drift Deposits (133) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Iron Deposits (65) Surface Soil Cracks (BB) Inundation Visible on Aerial check au that apply). Sparsely vegetated Concave Surface (Be) Water -Stained Leaves (except MSA 1, 2, 4A & 413) (B9) Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tolled Soils (06) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) ❑ Other (explain in remarks) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): water -Stained leaves (139) ('ALBA 1, 2, 4A 3 413) Drainage Patterns (1310) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Saturation Visi44e on Aerial Imagery (CO) Geomorphic Posttion (D2) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC-Neuh'ai Test (D5) Raised Ant 'Mounds (DB) (LRR A) Frost -Heave Hummocks Imagery (BT) Field Observations Surface Water Present?❑ Water Table Present? Saturation Present? ❑ {incudes capillary fringe) Yes Yes Yes No Depth (in): No Depth (in): No f j f Depth (in): 7� f Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ No Describe Recorded ata (slraani gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: f c tit Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Afountaurs, Vaffeys, and Coast — Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Supplement to the 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual Project Site: Hawks Landing, Crowne Plaza Hotel Sampling Hate: 4/8109 Applicant/Owner: Hawks Landing, LLC Sampling Point: DP -5 Investigator: Pat/Oscar/Jerom City/County: Renton/Kin Section, Township, Range: S29 T24N R5E State: WA Landform (hiltslope, terrace, etc) Slope (%} Local relief (concave, convex, none) Subregion (LRR) ALat 47.5338 Lang —122.19487 1Datum Soil Map Unit Name No, Norma INWI classification: None Are dimaticihydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? X Yes ❑ No (if no, explain in remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances' present an the site? X Yes © No =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 10 ft R_) Are Vegetation ❑, Soil, ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? No Percent of Dominant Species that are asL, FAcw, or FAC: -'� (Al B) Are Vegetation ❑, Soil, ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.} SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site MaR showing sampling int locations, transects, important features, etc. ,�, / Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ❑ Yes No Is this Sampling Point within a Wedand? Yes I No Hydric Sails Present? ❑ Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes No Remarks.- VEGETATION emarks: VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 ft R 1 Absolute % Dominant r Cover SpLcies7 Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet 1. %lCd !t- _ri ,2t Crx Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2. 3. Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 10 ft R_) Percent of Dominant Species that are asL, FAcw, or FAC: -'� (Al B) c Prevalence Index Worksheet Total Cover of multiply OBL species x 1 = 2- 3- 4. FACW species x2= 5. FAC species x3= Herb Stratum (Plot size 5 ft R = Total cover ) FACU species x4= UPL species x 5 = Column totals (A) g 1. Prevalence Index = B / A = 2. 3. 4. Hydr9phytic Vegetation Indicators 5 Dominance test is n 5D°/n s Prevalence test is 5 9.0' 7. Morphological Adaptations • (provide supporting data in remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. P. Wetland Non -Vascular Plants 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain) 11. • Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic WoodyVlneftwWrn Plot size = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vagetation Yes ❑ No PreSOA? 1. 2. = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remanks: ve t U5 Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains. Valleys, and Coast- Interim Version SOIL %arnnlinn Pninf nP-5 HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Profile Descrl on: Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators. Depth Matrix Redox Features check ❑ 1 ❑ inches Calor mens % Co)or moist % T Loc Texture Remarks A -�- Field Observations Surface Water Present? ❑ Yes .. D y No Depth (in): Water Table Present? ❑ Yes Saturation Present? ❑ Yes (includes capillary fringe) No Depth (in): ! I ` No Depth (in): I Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Describe Record Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 42L % Remarks: 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Loc: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix dric Soft Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis' ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ I Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ I 2Gm Murk (Al 0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) F—01 Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) FE -1-1 Other (explain in remarks) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) rw Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (All 2) ❑ Sandy ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must Mm*y Mineral (Si) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) -1-1 be present, unless disturbed or problematic Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) FE Redox Depressions (FO) Restrictive Laver (If oresent): Type: Hydric soil present? Yes ❑ No Depth (inches): Remanks: " HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum ofone required: Fa Surface water (Al) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Sediment Deposits (82) Drift Deposits (83) Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) Surface Soil Cracks (86) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) check ❑ 1 ❑ aN mat apply): Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B0) Water -Stained Laves (89) (ULRA 1, 2,4A & 48) Water -Stained Leaves (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A & 413) (139) Drainage Patterns (B10) Salt Crust (811) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (CO) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Shallow Aquitard (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) FAC -Neutral Test (1351 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (06) Raised AM Mounds (DB) (LRR A) Stunted or Stressed Plants (Di) (LRR A) Frost -Heave Hummocks Mar (explain in remarks) ❑ ❑ ❑ © ❑ Field Observations Surface Water Present? ❑ Yes No Depth (in): Water Table Present? ❑ Yes Saturation Present? ❑ Yes (includes capillary fringe) No Depth (in): ! I ` No Depth (in): I Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Describe Record Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 42L % Remarks: U5 Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Mterrm Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Supplement to the 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual Project Site: Hawks Landing, Crowne Plaza Hotel Sampling Date: 418149 Applicant/Owner Hawks Landing, LLC Sampling Point: DP -6 Investigator: Pat/Oscar/Jerom City/County: Renton/Kin Section, Township, Range: S29 T24N R5E State: WA Landform (hillslope, taroks, etc) — -;, :a , -, Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none) Subregion (LRR) A Lai 47.5338 Long —122.19487 Datum Soil Map Unit Name No, Norma I NWI dassifrcation: None conditions on the site typical for Ehis time of year? X Yes ElNo (ff no, explain in remarks.) "Normal Circumstances' present on the site? X Yes ElNo LA.Gimatir/hydrologic Vegetation [3, Soil,[I, or Hydrology Elsignificantly disturbed? No (�B) Vegetation ❑, Soil, ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) aurrrmwrcr ur rtnuinc2s — Armen sme map snowinll sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? D9b Yes❑ No is this Sampling Point within a Wetiand? Yes 0 No Hydric Soils Present? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology logy Present? /� <<' Yes Q No Rema►ks: ii f�IJ- --t - tl /!C// , / i-+1 C:? . l,`' ` -r� VEGETATION — Usa neianfifir_ names of ninnfa Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 ft R ) Absolute % Dominant Indicator Cover S es? Status Dominance Test Worksheet Number of Dominant Species that are ORL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2, 3. Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. =Total Cover SaplinglShrub Stratum (Plot size 10 ft R__) Peroent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71 _ .661 (�B) 1. « 5 "c Ga',_ _�. � Prevalence Index Worksheet Total a Cover of Multloly OBL species X i = 2 a r- 1 r 3. 4. FACW species X2= 5. FAC species x3= Herb Stratum (Piot size 51t_R, =Total Cover ) FACU species x4= UPL species x 5 = Column totals {A) g 1. Prevalence Index = B I A = 2. 3. 4. H drois V station Indicators 5. Dominance test is > 50% 6. Prevalenoe test is 5 3.0 ` 7. Morphological Adaptations' (provide supporting data In remarks or on a separate sheet) $ 8 Weiland Nan -Vascular Plants' 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation ' (explain) 11. " Indicators of hydric loll and wetland hydrology must be nt, unless disturbed or problematic W Vine Stratum Piot size = Total Cover I Hydrophytic Vegetation Yes No Present? El= 1. 2. Tonal Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 4� Remarfrs� � ff, l�� if il� G'- �r�C , G•�?1�1L"-['.� � L..� �%j�1� �l���iL'v •,f � 15 G'f' . US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys. and Coast— Interim Version SOIL Cemniinn Pnint 1713_6 HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Profile Descrl 'on: Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators. Depth Matrix Redox Features at! that apply): Secondary lrrdicaiors (2 or more required): Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A A 4B) Water -Stained Leaves (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A L 413) (89) Drainage Pattems (810) Saft crust (B 11) Dry -Season WaiarTable (C2) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Hydrogen Sulfide OdoT (Cl) Geomorphic Position (D2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Shallow Aquitard (03) Presence of Reduced hon (C4) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Frost -Heave Hummocks Other (explain in remarks) inches Color moist % Color moist % TypelLoc Texture Remarks Field Observations C5 e Surface Water Present? ❑ Yes Water Table Present? Yes Saturation Present? Yes (includes capillary fringe) r` No Depth (in): Depth (in): r1 No Depth (in):� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yea No ❑ FMNo ❑ Describe R riled Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available: Remarks: Z�/,-�'lCtf 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Loc: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix jtdric Sall Indicators: (Applicable to all ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Histic Epipadon (A2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) LRRs unless otherwise noted.) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Indicators for Problematic Hydric soils' ❑ 2cm Mucic (A10) Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Other (explain in remarks) ❑ ❑ Depleted Below Dade Surface (All) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Redox Depressions (F6) 3Indicators of hydmphytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Laver (if oresent): Type. Hydric Gall present? Yes No ❑ Depth (inches): Remarks:/ �l�r f r 1 /?C1 r �rC 1 HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Worn a, indicators (minimum of one required: Surface water (A1) igh Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Algal Mat or Crust (84) Iron Deposits (65) surface Soil Cracks (06) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) check ❑ ❑ at! that apply): Secondary lrrdicaiors (2 or more required): Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A A 4B) Water -Stained Leaves (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A L 413) (89) Drainage Pattems (810) Saft crust (B 11) Dry -Season WaiarTable (C2) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Hydrogen Sulfide OdoT (Cl) Geomorphic Position (D2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Shallow Aquitard (03) Presence of Reduced hon (C4) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Frost -Heave Hummocks Other (explain in remarks) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Field Observations Surface Water Present? ❑ Yes Water Table Present? Yes Saturation Present? Yes (includes capillary fringe) r` No Depth (in): Depth (in): r1 No Depth (in):� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yea No ❑ FMNo ❑ Describe R riled Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available: Remarks: Z�/,-�'lCtf US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM Westem Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Supplement to the 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual Project Site: Hawks Landing, Crowne Plaza Hotel Sampling Date: 41JgJ09 Applicant/Owner: Hawks Landing, LLC Sampling Point: DP -7 Investigator. Pat/Osrar/derom City/County: Renton/Kin Section, Township, Range: S29 T24N R5E State: WA Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc) Slope {%) Local relief (concave, convex, none) Subregion (LRR) A at 47.5336 Long —122.19467 1Datum Soil Map Unit Name No, Norma NWI dassification: None Are cltmaticlhydrologic conftons on the site typical for this time of year? X Yes ❑ No (if no, explain in remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances' present on the site? X Yes ❑ No Are Vegetation ❑, Soil, ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? No Are Vegetation ❑, Soil, ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site mat showing sampling int locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No Is this Sampling Point within a Wedend? 0❑ Yes �No Hydric Soils Present? ❑ Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes No Remarks- VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 ft `� Absolute % Cover --Species? Dominant Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2. k I Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (S) 4, Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot sine t o it R___) =Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species that are CBL, FACW, or FAC: I. D1" Prevalence Index Worksheet Total % Cover of Multiply by DBL species x 1 = 2 3, •Ir r f -1 tj �i'` e— 4. FACW species X2= 5. FAC species x3= Herb tratum (Plot size 5 ft R ) = Total Cover FACU species x4= UPL species x 5 = Column totals (A) 13 Prevalence Index = B / A = 2. 3. 4. Hydro hytic Vegetation Indicators 5- L ,Y C,^� , ..: ;r Z- G {r Dominance test is > 50% 6 Prevalence test is s 3.0 " 7. Morphological Adaptations' (provide supporting data in remarks or on a separate sheet) 8• g. Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10• Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation . (explain) 11. ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be resent, unless disturbed or problematic Woad Vine Stratum Plot size = Tsai Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ❑ 1, 2. =Total Cover % Bare Ground In Herb Stratum , / r fCh"] ? kw Remarks: f, 1 ' v jy US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valleys, and Coast- Interim Version SOIL Sarnolinq Point DP -7 HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Profile Description. Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators. Depth Matrix Redox Features aN that apply): Secondary lndicafors (2 or mons required): inches Color moist °% Color moist °% TwelLoc Texture Remarks Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Water -Stained Leaves (89) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A & 413) 1 CC, .i, r., 's -i Water Stained Leaves (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A b 48) (119) Drainage Pattems (616) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (B11) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) 0 1 Water Marks (Bi) Aquatic Invertebrates (613) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Sediment Deposits (82) 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS --Covered or Coated Sand Grains 'Loc: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Saite' ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2cm Muck (A16) 131 Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ 1 Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Other (explain In remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Laver (ii Dresent): Type Hydric soil present? Yes Na Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (mrrrimum Clone required: check aN that apply): Secondary lndicafors (2 or mons required): Surfacer (Al) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Water -Stained Leaves (89) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A & 413) High Water Table (A2) Water Stained Leaves (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A b 48) (119) Drainage Pattems (616) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (B11) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) 0 1 Water Marks (Bi) Aquatic Invertebrates (613) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Sediment Deposits (82) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Shallow Aqultard (D3) Algal Mat or Crust (84) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (85) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Raised Ant Mounds (136) (LRR A) Surface S R Cracks (BB) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Frost -Heave Hummocks Inundation Visible on Aerial Other (explain In remarks) Imagery (87) Field Observations Surface Water Present? ❑ Yes Water Table Present? ❑ Yes Saturation Present? ❑ Yes (includes caplllary fringe) No Depth (in): No Depth (in): No Depth (in): yyatland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ Na be Recorded /Dta (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Y`��(•'�+f.Cfi fr-4'� /F!.-/, �+IF iC 'CrX 'f(� 4'r��F^'�i'�CC i;��f�, G+s�%.%_. �'G/ ! /f FL.f. i a US Army Corps o►Engineers Western Mountains, VaNeys, and Coast — Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM Westem Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Supplement to the 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual Project Site: Hawks Landing, Crowne Plaza Hotel Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: Hawks Landing, LLC Sampling Point: E`.; Investigator: Pat/Oscar/Jerom City/County: Renton/Kin Section, Township, Range: S29 T24N R5S State: WA Landform (hillslope, terrace, Slp pe (%) �. Local relief (concave, convex, none) Subregion (LRR) A Lat 47.5338 Long —122.19487 Datum Soil Map Unit Name No, Norma I NWI dassificatiom None Are dimatidhydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time pf year? X Yes ❑ No (If no, explain in remarks.) Are'Normal Circumstances' present on the site? X Yes❑ No Are Vegetation 0, Soil, ❑, or Hydrology [] significantly disturbed? No Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strafe: Are Vegetation ❑, Soil, ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks, ) -MF yr r-inwinua —^uarn srw map snowing LFAInping pojntiocations,transects, imponant features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F ❑ I No Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland? Yes [Vo Hydric Soils Present? ❑ Yes Sir No Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes No Remarks: lhisr' it 'l et'i Plz�slr- -�G' + ; 4 eV91-C rT r VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 R R _ j Absolute % Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Cover S ,es? Status t. 07111:s r1.1 � Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2. 3. Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strafe: 4. (S) = Taal Corer Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:f () Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 10 ft R__)! f` �C Prevalence Index Worksheet Total % Cover f Mul i # b 2' 3. �+ C O8L species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = s. FAC species X3= d = Total Cover FACU species x4= UPL species x5= Herb Stratum (Plot size 5 ft R ) Column totals (A) B 1. Prevalenoe Index = B 1 A = 2. 3. 4. Hydrophytic V etation Indicators 5'X, Dominance hest is > 50% 6' Prevalence testis s 3.0 " 7. Morphological Adaptations " (provide supporting data in remarks or on a separate sheet) 8 9. Wetland Non-VasculaT Plants' 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation ' (explain) 11. " indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be Total Cover Woody Vlne Stratum (Plot size prerent, unless disturbed or problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ❑ 1. 2. = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum nerrrarR�. rie i � f r � �/� jp�f1 )/ / [ •, / _ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Vafleys, and Coast — Interim Version SOIL HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Profile Deacri ion: Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators. Depth Matrix Redox Features aN that apply): Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) WatwStained Leaves (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A 3 48) (139) Salt Crust (B11) Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) Secondary Indicators (2 armor!? required): Water -Stained Leaves (89) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A 3 4B) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C8) inches Color (moist) % Color moist % T Loc Texture Remarks Sediment Deposits (132) Drift Deposits (63) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Iron Deposits (135) Surface Soil Cracks (136) inundation Visible on Aerial Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized RhLospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (Ce) Stunted or Stressed Plants (Di) (LRR A) Other (explain in remarks) Geomarphic Position (02) Shallow Aquitard (03) FAC -Neutral Test (135) Raised Ant Mounds (DB) (LRR A) Frost -Heave Hummocks ❑ Imagery (137) Field Observations Surface Water Present? F= Water Table Present? r-0-1 Saturation Present? ❑ (Includes capillary fringe) YesNo Yes Yes Depth (n): No Depth (in): No Depth (in): C }' Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ Nc Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if avallable: `Type: C=Concentration, D=Deplation, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 21-oc: PL -Pore Lining, M=Matrix l�fi� � >l� � j�..'"L.r dric Soil indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted.) Indicatcim for Problematic Hydric Solis' ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (SS) F Q -I 2cm Muck (Al 0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (SB) 1 ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) -E-1-1 Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) F Other (explain in remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) FM Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (173) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (FS) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Sur%ce (FT) be present, unless disturbed or problematic ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (FB) Restrictive Laver Cif Dmsenu: Type Hydric loll present? Yes No Depth (inches): Remarks: ,,��f r }�i }" ''.j el�G C'%�Y-€f�.G ; l l.w1 �1 '! t. Lt 7.:•: rC.. LI��-G.,. fc. ,��� 1 %` i/r`�Ik f..r'�' :� 1 l�, r r HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one requin3d.' Surface water (Al) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (81) check 0 aN that apply): Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) WatwStained Leaves (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A 3 48) (139) Salt Crust (B11) Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) Secondary Indicators (2 armor!? required): Water -Stained Leaves (89) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A 3 4B) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C8) ❑ ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) Drift Deposits (63) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Iron Deposits (135) Surface Soil Cracks (136) inundation Visible on Aerial Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized RhLospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (Ce) Stunted or Stressed Plants (Di) (LRR A) Other (explain in remarks) Geomarphic Position (02) Shallow Aquitard (03) FAC -Neutral Test (135) Raised Ant Mounds (DB) (LRR A) Frost -Heave Hummocks ❑ Imagery (137) Field Observations Surface Water Present? F= Water Table Present? r-0-1 Saturation Present? ❑ (Includes capillary fringe) YesNo Yes Yes Depth (n): No Depth (in): No Depth (in): C }' Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ Nc Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if avallable: Remarks: ai �� �,{� ,�,! �,.�'_• l.. 1+l ��"T{ l H � Pk.�f �<:J �,.«} r.t.., l�fi� � >l� � j�..'"L.r US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valleys, and Coast- Interim Version No. 84717-7 THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF RENTON, Respondent, 0 CHRISTOPHER BURTON PHILLIPS, Petitioner. ANSWER TO PETITIONER'S RAP 17.7 MOTION TO MODIFY THE COMMISSIONER'S RULING Gannon Newsom II WSBA No. 31418 Renton Assistant City Attorney Attorney for Respondent City of Renton 100 S. 2nd Street P.O. Box 626 Renton, Washington 98057 425-255-8678 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. IDENTITY OF RESPONDENT................................•----..........................................................................1 2. RECORD OF FACTS RELEVANT TO THE MOTION.................................».......................................1 3. ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW.....................................................................................................1 4. STATEMENT OF THE CASE..................................................................................................................1 A. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND.................................................................................................... I B. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.............................................................................................5 S. ARGUMENT..._...............................».....»...........».............»..................................................................».6 A. PETITIONER CONTINUES TO DISPUTE FACTS THAT THE JURYEITHER DID NOT HEAR OR DID NOT GIVE SIGNIFICANT WEIGHT TO DURING THEIR DELIBERATIONS ......................................................................... 6 R. THE COMMUNITYC4RETA%ING DOCTRINE ALLOWS WARRANTLESS ENTRY INTO A HOME TO PROTECT THE HOMEOWNER OR THE HOMEOWNER'S PROPERTY...............................................................................9 G MIRANDA WARNINGS ARE ONLY REQUIRED FOR A PERSON IN CUSTODY .............................................. I I D. THE EXCULPATORYNO DOCTRINEDOF.SNOT EXIST IN WASHINGTON................................................12 E PETITIONER FAILED TO ESIABLISH A RAP 2.S(A) BASIS FOR REVIEW.................................................12 F. PETITIONER CANNOTOBTAINA MISTWAL AND CLAIMDOUBLEJEOPARDE..................................... .... 13 G PETITIONER HAS NOT PROVEN MT ANY TESTIMONY OTHER THAN HIS OWN WAS FALSE OR THAT THE PROSECUTOR .KNOWINGLY PRESENTED FALSE TESTIMONY.......................................................................16 H. THE GOVERNMENT'S CONDUCT DOES NOT WARRANT A FINDING OF PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT OR APPLICATION OF THEDOCTRINE OFOUTRAGE..........................................................................................17 I TH,EMISTRIAL DID NOT BENEETT RENTON BUT DiD BENEFIT PETITIONER AND R.ENTON NEVER ASKED OR ARGUED ABOUTSEXUALORIENTATION..................................................I.................-•-----------•--•-•-•----•-- 18 R PET7TiONER SHOULD PAYRENTION'S COSTS FOR HIS APPE4.Y............................................................ I9 6. CONCLUSION.............................................................................................................I........».................19 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Oregon v- Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667; 102 S. Ct. 2083; 72 L. Ed. 2d 416 (1982)........... 15,16 State v. Copeland, 130 Wn.2d 244; 922 P.2d 1304 (1996) ............................................... 14 State v. Fisher, 165 Wn.2d 727; 202 P.3d 937 (2009) ...................................................... 14 State v. Gentry, 125 Wn.2d 570; 888 P.2d 1105 (1995) ................................................... 18 State v. Heritage, 152 Wn.2d 210; 95 P.3d 345 (2004) .................................................... 12 State v. Juarez, 115 Wn. App. 881; 64 P.3d 83 (Div III 2003) ................................ .. 15 State v- Kinzy, 141 Wn.2d 373; 5 P.3d 668 (2000) ....................................................... 9,10 State v. Lavaris, 99 Wn.2d 851; 664 P.2d 1234 (1983) .................................................... 12 State v. Lively, 130 Wn.2d 1; 921 P.2d 1035 (1996) .................................................. 17,18 State v. Magers, 164 Wn.2d 174; 189 P.3d 126 (2008) ...................... State v. Melton, 97 Wn. App. 327; 983 P.2d 699 (Div. l 1999) ........................................ 14 State v. Myers, 102 Wn.2d 548; 689 P.2d 38 (1984)........................................................17 State v Rich, 63 Wn. App. 743; 821 P.2d 1269 (Div II 1992) ................................... 15,16 State v Robinson, 146 Wn. App. 471; 191 P.3d 906 (Div. II 2008) .......................... 15,16 State v. Seagull, 95 Wn.2d 898; 632 P.2d 44 (1981)............. ......................................... 7,8 State v. Smith, 165 Wn.2d 511; 199 P_3d 386 (2009) ................................................... 9, 11 State v. Thompson, 151 Wn.2d 793; 92 P.3d 228 (2004) ................................................. 11 State v. Thorn, 129 Wn.2d 347; 917 P.2d 108 (1996) ...................................................... 12 State v. Wright, 131 Wn, App. 474; 127 P.3d 742 (2046) . ............... ............................. ... 15 United States v. Scott 437 U.S. 82; 98 S. Ct. 2187; 57 L. Ed. 2d 65 (1978) ....................15 United States v. Tobias, 662 F.2d 381 (1981), cert- denied, 457 U.S. 1108; 73 L. Ed. 2d 1317; 102 S. Ct. 2908 (1982).................................................................................... ... 18 Statutes RCW66.44.270................................................................................................................... 2 RCW9A.76.175.................................................................................................................. 2 Rules CrRLJ4.7..........................................................................•--............----- ._....... 5, 13 CrRfJ8-3(a)..-..-. ............ ....................... ............................................................................ 5 RALJ11.2(a)..................................................................................................I.------......----- 19 RALJ11.2(c).....................................................................................................................20 RALJ9.3(a)....................................................................................................................... 19 RAP13.5(b)............................................................................................................ 6, 12, 20 Constitutional Provisions Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution.. Ordinances RMC 6-18-11 .................................... 11 ............... ........•- ------ 11,12 ..................................•-- ._.........14 ...................................... 2 I. Identity of Respondent The City of Renton (hereinafter "Renton"), the Respondent, apposes Petitioner's RAP 17.7 Motion to Modify the Commissioner's Ruling. 2. Record of Facts Relevant to the Motion. Renton files this Answer to Petitioner's Motion to Modify the Commissioner's Ruling in support of its request that the Washington State Supreme Court deny Petitioner's motion in its entirety. On September 7, 2010, Supreme Court Commissioner Steven Goff filed a Ruling Denying Review affirming the Court of Appeals panel and lower court decisions. 3. Issues Presented for Review. Has Petitioner proven that Supreme Court Commissioner Goff failed to apply the proper standard when denying Petitioner's Motion for Discretionary Review under RAP 13.5(b)(1)-(3)? 4. Statement of the Case. A. Relevant Factual Background. There were two jury trials. The first trial on September 11-12, 2008, ended in a mistrial. At the retrial on December 4, 2008, a jury found Petitioner guilty of Breach of the .Public Peace (RMC 6-18-11), Making a False or Misleading Statement to a Public Servant (RCW 9A.76.175), and Furnishing Liquor to Minors (RCW 66.44.270). The following facts were presented at both trials. Petitioner's loud party at his home, at 1808 S.E. 8a' Street, Renton, on December 10, 2007, awoke his neighbors, Joanne and Larry Mayes.' From a bedroom window Mr. Mayes saw Petitioner partying with minors? Mr. Mayes called 911 to complain about the noise.3 Officers then arrived at Petitioner's home.4 Police Officers Kordel and Morgan responded to a "loud party complaint."5 At 3:00 a.m., from the front of Petitioner's home, Officer Kordel saw "a bunch" or "a wave" of "at least ten" minors nun out of the back of the house, jumping through neighbors' yards; three extremely intoxicated teenagers who answered the front door, denied living there and denied that anyone lived there; "beer bottles scattered about, vomit on the floor, front door wide open, back door wide open."6 Officer Kordel stated that he needed to find the homeowner because he did not know if these kids broke into the house. I can, I cannot, under the obligation of my duties as a police ` September 2008 trial transcript, p. 571.8 - 17, p. 82 1.7 - p.83 -1.8, p. 1301.6 -1.11 (hereinafter "Appendix A"); December 2008 trial transcript, p- 1871. 16 --1.26 (hereinafter "Appendix B"). 2 Appendix A, p- 91 1.5 - p. 92 1.12, p- 94 1. 18 - p. 95 1. 11; Appendix B, p. 1581.21 - p. 1591- 18; p- 1641.24; p- 161 1.4 -1. 11. s Appendix A, p. 5 91. 13 - 21, p. 61 1.9 -16, p. 891.17 - p. 901.10, p. 95 1.12 -21, p. 96 1.11 - p.971. 7. 4 Appendix A, p. 90 1.11- p.91 1.4, p. 146 1.21-- p. 1491. 7; Appendix B, p. 1621. 2 -1.17. 3 Appendix A, p. 145 1. 20 - p. 1461.5; Appendix B, p. 187 1. 16 --1.26; p. 1881. 15 -- p. 189 1. 19. 6 June 10, 2008, motions hearing, p. 171. 13 - p. 18 1.23 (hereinafter "Appendix C'); Appendix A, 1321. 16 - p.1341.21, p. 147 1.22 - p. 148 1 .9, p. 149 1. 4 - p. 1541. 18; Appendix B, p. 187 1.22 -1.26, p. 1901. 1 -- p. 1921.2. 2 officer, I cannot leave a house like that with the back door wide open, front door wide open and three people who, uh, by their own account are not, and it's not their place. And in addition that they are, and the condition of the house, 1 cannot leave that. I need to find a responsible adult or homeowner, or somebody in charge of that place to leave it to.7 Officer Kordel emphasized that his only interest was to find the homeowner, not to conduct a criminal investigation.8 Officer Kordel "wasn't searching for any evidence," he "was looking for the owner of the house" or someone "who was responsible for that house."4 Officer Morgan found Petitioner upstairs in a bedroom; Petitioner said that he owned the house; and that incredibly, "he did not know that there was a party in his house; [h]e had no idea how [the kids] got into the house;" that "Ne didn't let them in, he didn't know who let them in, he'd never seen them before;" and that "he doesn't know how they got the alcohol. He didn't supply the alcohol."10 Now he claims that "guests of the home refused to allow the officers entry" and his "guests demanded the officers 1 eave."t' Despite his improbable claims Petitioner was not cited or arrested 'Appendix C, p. 171.13—p. 181.23; see Appendix A, p. 1541.8; .Appendix B, p. 1% 1. 1. 'Appendix C, p. 26 I. I4 — 26, p. 281. 3 — 26; Appendix A, p. 1541. 8; Appendix B, p. 196 1-16. 9 Appendix C, p. 291. 18 — p. 301.7; Appendix A, p. 153 I, 2; Appendix B, p. 196 L 16. ° Appendix C, p. 181.24 — p. 19 L 13, p. 21 1. 4 — p. 23 1.25, p. 29 i. 18 — p. 341.7. Appendix B, p. 1561. 18 — p. 158 1. 3, p. 2001. 1 — p. 201 1. 26, p. 202 1. 9, p. 208 1. 23 — p. 209 L 22; Appendix A, p. 133 1.4 — p. 134 1. 13. ' ' Petition for ,Review, on page 11. that night. 12 The officers left believing that the noise complaint had been resolved. 13 More than a week later, Officer Kordel cited Petitioner after witness Larry Mayes informed him that Petitioner knew of the party. 14 At the first jury trial, Petitioner testified that he was unaware that there was a party in his home on December 10, 2007.15 On September 11, 2008, Mr. Mayes gave the prosecutor a copy of Petitioner's December 21, 2007, 911 Call. 16 Renton told the trial court and Petitioner about the newly obtained 911 recording on September 12, 2008.17 Because Renton did not immediately exchange the recording on September 11, or the morning of September 12, the trial court excluded the recording, and disregarded the fact that the recording was irrelevant to the December 10, 2007, party until Petitioner denied knowledge of the party.' After verifying that only the recording was inadmissible, the prosecutor asked 12 straight questions related to the December 21, 2007, 911 call without mentioning the recording, and without Petitioner or the trial court objecting, admonishing, requesting a sidebar or seeking a `Z Appendix A, p. 168 1.8 - p. 169 1.4; Appendix B, p- 208 1. 23 - p. 2091.22. �} Appendix A, p. 1701. 17 - 21; Appendix B, p. 209 1.22. 14 Appendix A, P. 1601. 9 - p. 161 1.11; Appendix 8, p. 210 1. 10; p. 212 1. 16 - p. 215 1.2. f5 Appendix A, p. 234 1.22 -- p. 2351. 11; p. 240 1. 8 - p. 241 1.2; p. 2591. 13 - p. 261 - 1.10. :b Appendix A, p- 248 1. 10 - P. 2491.6. �7 Appendix A, p. 241 I. 10. $ Appendix A, p. 255 1. 15 - 2561. 257 1. 20. 4 clarifcation,'9 The trial court granted Petitioner objection when the prosecutor asked, "And, you told the 911 operator at that time that "We threw a party, and this is how part of this (inaudible)."20 Over Renton's objections; Petitioner unsuccessfully moved for dismissal based on CrRLJ 8.3(a), and then successfully moved to dismiss under CrRLJ 4.7(a)." B. Relevant Procedural Background. Prior to both trials, on June 10, 2008, the trial court denied Petitioner's motion to suppress the officers' entry into the home. 22 The trial court held that the community caretaking doctrine permitted the officers' warrantless entry into Petitioner's home. "[T)he officers were not primarily motivated by an intent to make an arrest or seize evidence."23 The hearing court ruled that "[tjhe officers were at that time not investigating the possible commission of a crime involving minors and alcohol, but were focused on... their general community caretaking responsibilities."24 (Italics in original). Petitioner appealed the first trial court's decision after the second jury rendered guilty verdicts. '9 Appendix A, p.2561.21 -- p. 257 1.2; p. 2591. 13 — p. 261 1. 10;p-2411.9—p.2421-3- 20 0;p_24]1.9—p.2421.3_74 Appendix A, p. 2591. 13 — p. 261 —1. 10. 21 Appendix A, p. 262 1. 4 —1.8. 22 See Appendix C and the Ruling of Pro Tem Christy Cufley (hereinafter "Appendir D"). 23.4ppendix D, p. 4_ During the first trial, counsel for Petitioner agreed that the entry was for community caretaking. Appendix A, p_ 1371.4 — 18. 24 Appendix D, p. 4. S. Argument. Commissioner Goff applied RAP 13.5(b). Under RAP 13.5(6) this Court will accept discretionary review of an interlocutory decision of the Court of Appeals only if Petitioner shows that: (1) If the Court of Appeals has committed an obvious error which would render further proceedings useless; or (2) If the Court of Appeals has committed probable error and the decision of the Court of Appeals substantially alters the status quo or substantially limits the freedom of a party to act; or (3) If the Court of Appeals has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, or so far sanctioned such a departure by a trial court or administrative agency, as to call for the exercise of revisory jurisdiction by the Supreme Court. Petitioner did not establish a basis for review under RAP 13.5(b) and has not shown error justifying modification of the Commissioner's ruling under RAP 17.7. A. Petitioner amues unsupported or untrue facts. First, there is no trial evidence of "problems" between Petitioner and Mr_ Mayes prior to the party. 25 Petitioner did not testify during the second trial. The only "problem" mentioned was that days after Petitioner's party, Mr. Mayes' vehicle was damaged and he spoke to Petitioner about it.26 Petitioner got a temporary restraining order, but the 21 Mofion to Modify Commissioner's Ruling, eighth page of section VI, 26 Appendix B, p. 1641. 20 - p. 168 1. 21; p. 171 1. 20 - p. 1761.7. 6 superior court declined to issue a permanent order, 27 Second, Petitioner alleges that officers unlocked a gate and passed by barking dogs. There is no trial evidence to support his claim. None of the minors testified at either trial, and even Exhibit B, p. 190, that Petitioner cites (as App. 5 p. 468) does not mention a gate or dogs. State a Seagull which Petitioner cites supports the Commissioner's and the Court of Appeals' decisions. 21 In Seagull, this Court stated: The presence of an officer within the curtilage of a residence does not automatically amount to an unconstitutional invasion of privacy. Rather, it must be determined under the facts of each case just how private the particular observation point actually was. It is clear that police with legitimate business may enter areas of the curtilage which are impliedly open, such as access routes to the house. In so doing they are free to keep their eyes open.29 Applying the Seagull standard, there is no testimony that the officers saw a fence or a gate_ The noise complaint was Iegitimate police business. As the officers approached the house they saw at least 10 minors fleeing the rear of Petitioner's home, beer bottles scattered about, and vomit on floor. 30 Petitioner has not claimed that they walked off of the walkway; therefore their actions conformed to the Seagull standard. 27 Appendix B, p. 174 L 1 -1.24 28 State v. Seagull, 95 Wn.2d 898; 532 Ptd 44 (1981). 29 State v Seagull, 95 Wn.2d at 903. 30 Appendix B, p. 190 1. 1 -- p. 191 1. 24. 7 Third, Petitioner claims that he had already been contacted before his "roommates" were found. This is untrue. Officer Kordel found the two roommates, who "said they didn't know, [and] they had no clue what was going on," "immediately at the same time Officer Morgan had contacted" Petitioner.3 1 Neither "roommate" answered the front door, and they, like Petitioner, were only found after the officers entered the home. Incongruently, Petitioner complains that the officers were trespassing despite his claim that he did not know the minors or about the party.32 If Petitioner did not know about the minors, the party, or the alcohol, the officers helped him by stopping the party, evicting the trespassers, and returning the home to him. Incredibly, he claims that "guests of the home refused to allow the officers entry" and the "guests demanded the officers leave." Which is it, were they unknown trespassers or guests. If they were trespassers, their activities validates the officers' actions, if they were guests, the officers' actions were also justified. Fourth, Petitioner claims that he was pulled from his bed, "in the nude, just to interrogate him about the mere possibility that he may have provided alcohol to minors."33 There is no evidence or testimony to support these claims. That is why Petitioner did not refer to anything in 31 Appendix B, p. 1991. 14 — p. 2001. 6. 32 Append& B, p. 1491. 14 — p. 2001. 6, p. 218 1. 6 -- L 26, p. 2201. 4 — p_ 2.21 1. 6, 33 Motion to Mo&fy Commissioner's Ruling, the ninth page of section V1. support of this claim. Fifth, Petitioner continues to "play fast and loose" with the facts, by claiming that the officer "stated that that the only reason for entry was to investigate a crime."34 The unsworn "transcriptions" that he cites do not say what Petitioner alleges, but rather that "a neighbor wanted the party or the noise complaint taken care of That was nay whole purpose." Not only is his transcription unsworn but his interpretation is inaccurate. The Commissioner's ruling is addressed in more detail below. B. The conymm ty caretaking doctrine is applicable: Petitioner has failed to show that the Commissioner's ruling concerning community caretaking was error. The parameters of the community caretaking exception are clear in that it is only allowed if: (1) the police officer subjectively believed that someone likely needed assistance for health or safety concerns, (2) a reasonable person in the same situation would similarly believe that there was need for assistance, and (3) there was a reasonable basis to associate the need for assistance with the place being searched .35 Officer Kordel stated that he did not know if intoxicated minors "broke into house", or if the "party got out of control. ,36 Applying the State v. Kin -7 analysis; the officers had a subjective concern that 34 Motion to Modem Commissioner's Ruling, the sixth page of section Vt. "State v. Smith, 165 Wn.2d 511, 522; 199 P.3d 386 (2009) (dissent); citing State v. Kimy, 141 Wn2d 373, 386-387; 5 P.3d 668 (20(10). 36 Appendix B, p. 196 I. 1 _ 0 Petitioner may not have been safe or present to protect his property because vomit and alcohol containers that were on the carpet; minors fled the home once the officers arrived; and drunken minors opened the front door and said that no one owned the home. A similarly situated reasonable person would have correctly believed something was wrong. Due to those facts, Commissioner Goff found that the Court of Appeal committed no error meriting review when it concluded that the officers' warrantless entry into Petitioner's home was lawful to find the Petitioner, and to ensure his and his property's safety. The officers' sole intent was to locate for the missing homeowner as evidenced by the fact that they did not cite or arrest Petitioner that night37 The trial court noted that while the noise complaint "may" have resulted in prosecution, based on the officers' observations, the "initial inquiry metamorphosed into a community caretaking function." 38 Petitioner relies on the dissenting opinion in State v. Smith, to claim that the officers improperly entered his home. 39 The dissenting opinion supports the officers' entry into Petitioner's home. "Under the Fourth 37 Appendix D, p. 3; Appendix B, p. 1971. 12, p. 20$ 1.23 — p_ 2091.22; Appendix A, p. 13I 1. 18—p. 1321. 10. 38 Appendix D, p. 3. 39 State v. Smith, 165 Wn.2d at 520. State v_ Smith involved a warrantless safety sweep that resulted in a warrant being issued, at least in part, based on observations made during the warrantless entry. 165 Wn.2d at 515-516. Because the majority found that the "safety sweep" was proper, they never addressed "community caretaking." 165 Wn.2d at 519. 10 Amendment to the United States Constitution, `lt]his [community caretaking] exception allows for the limited invasion of constitutionally protected privacy rights when it is necessary for police officers to render aid or assistance or when making routine checks on health and safety."'40 Here, based on actions and statements of minors, and things on the floor, the officers had community caretaking concerns. Thus, Commissioner Goff correctly stated that the lower court decisions were consistent with precedent on the community caretaking f inction.4' C Miranda warnin are required when a person is in custody. Petitioner claims that officers should have read him Miranda warnings. Washington uses the federal test for "custody" of "whether a reasonable person in a suspect's position would have felt that his or her freedom was curtailed to the degree associated with a formal arrest.'42 "A person is `seized' within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution only when restrained by means of physical force or a show of authority."43 A "custodial interrogation" requires that the government deprives a person of freedom in any significant way. 44 Custodial statements are inadmissible unless the subject was first apprised 40 State v. Smith, 165 Wn.2d at 522 (dissent); citing State v. Thompson, 151 Wn.2d 793, 842; 92 P.3d 228 (2004). 4l Ruling Denying Review, p. 2. 41 State V. Heritage, 152 Wn.2d at 218 (citations omitted). 43 State v_ Thorn, 129 Wn.2d 347; 917 P.2d 108 (1996) (citations omitted). 11 of his or her constitutional right to counsel and of his or her privilege against self-incrimination. 45 Petitioner was not a suspect taken into custody. His freedom was not deprived in any significant way as he was not restrained, held at gunpoint, handcuffed, removed from his home or deprived of his ability to make a telephone call. Commission Goff correctly found that Petitioner was not in custody when questioned .47 D. The "Exc uIpatory No Doctrine" does not exist in Wash kigem Petitioner raises the "exculpatory no" argument for the first time on appeal. He has not shown that this doctrine has been adopted in Washington and so it cannot be the basis for RAP 13.5(6) review. E. Petitioner failed to es Ash a RAP 2-5(a) basis for review. Despite Petitioner's claim that RAP 2.5(a) applies, he has not shown a lack of trial court jurisdiction; insufficient facts upon which relief could have been granted; or a manifest error affecting a constitutional right. The incident occurred in Renton, a jury found him guilty, and if there was an error it was not a manifest error of constitutional magnitude. "4 State v. Heritage, 152 Wn.2d 210, 215; 95 Pad 345 (2004) (citations omitted). 4s State v. Lavaris, 99 Wn.2d 851, 856-857; 664 P.2d 1234 (1983); citing Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436,444; 16 L. Ed. 2d 694; 86 S. Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966). 46 Appendix A, p. 131 1. 18 — p. 132 L 10; Appendix B, p. 2081. 23 — p. 209 1. 22. Of the things that Petitioner said that night, only his admission to owning the home and his denial of knowledge about the party and the minors were offered at trial. 47 Ruling OeVing Review, g. 2. 12 F. Petitioner cannot obtain a mistrial and claim double 'eo ar. Using CrRLJ 4.7, Petitioner claims that Renton should have warned him that his 911 call 11 days atter his December 10, 2007, party could be used against him if he contradicted himself at trial .48 As interpreted by the trial court, CrRLJ 4.7 (a)(1)(ii) does not require that these statements be relevant to the incident in time, date, subject, or that the government intends on offering it in its case. As a result, every statement, even if it is in the government's possession from a closed case, falls within CrRLJ 4.7 (a)(1)(ii) thereby, creating a discovery obligation, irrespective of the statements innocuousness. Based on this interpretation, Renton's failure to anticipate that the recording from 11 days after the incident fell within CrRLJ 4.7(a)(1)(ii), resulted in an accidental discovery error. Even Petitioner's counsel saw the December 21, 2007 incident as "a totally unrelated property dispute.i49 "The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees a defendant a fair trial but not a trial free from error,"50 Despite his claim, Petitioner was not confronted with any constitutional rights trade-offs. Neither Petitioner's right to a speedy trial nor his right to have 48 Interestingly, Petitioner had a number of discs at the time of the first trial. See Appendix A, p. 253 1. 5 and Appendix B, p. 861. 12. The trial court ignored the possibility that there was no prejudice by failing to ask if Petitioner if he had the recording. 49 Appendix B, p. 129 —1. 9. S0 State v. Fisher, 165 Wn.2d 727, 746-747; 202 P.3d 937 (2009). In Fisher, the 13 the first jury decide the case was violated. He alleges that rather than asking for a curative instruction, he was forced to request a mistrial. The standard of review for a mistrial is abuse of discretion and "[t]he court's decision is normally accorded great deference."51 Renton sought to impeach Petitioner with his prior inconsistent statement. Even if the question was inappropriate, the remedy was a curative instruction with an admonition to disregard the question and answer. "The jury is presumed to follow instructions to disregard improper evidence."52 Double jeopardy does not bar retrial when a defendant requests and is granted a mistrial.53 This Court explained in State v. Robinson that "[a] retrial does not place a defendant in double jeopardy after the defendant requests and is granted a mistrial because, in so doing, the defendant defendant was granted a mistrial after attorney or prosecutorial misconduct. Ibid. 51 State v. Melton, 97 Wn. App. 327, 332, 333; 983 Ptd 699 (Div. 1 1999). In Melton, "the court did not contact the ailing defense counsel or determine whether substitute counsel would be available to address the question of declaring a mistrial. Nor did the court expressly acknowledge, at the time it declared a mistrial, that double jeopardy was an issue. But while these omissions involve important aspects of a mistrial decision, they do not, under these facts, demonstrate an abuse of discretion." 97 Wn. App. at 333. 12 Stale V. Copeland, 130 Wn.2d 244, 285; 922 P.2d 1304 (1996), In Copeland, during cross-examination, the prosecutor asked a defense witness about a conviction where he beat the victim until she was black and blue and burned her abdomen with a cigar. 130 Wn.2d at 284_" The trial court found prosecutorial misconduct because " [tjhe prosecutor's question was a deliberate attempt to influence the jury's perception" of a witness and his testimony" and this Court affirmed the conviction because of the appropriate curative instruction. 130 Wn.2d at 285. 5 State v. Robinson, 146 Wn. App_ 471, 479; 191 P.3d 906 (Div. 11 2008); citing State v. Wright, 131 Wn. App. 474,484; 127 P.3d 742 (2006) (citing United States v. Scott, 437 U.S. 82, 99; 98 S. Ct. 2187; 57 L. Ed. 2d 65 (1978)). In Robinson, "[tjhree days into trial, the bailiff approached the prosecutor and told him that the jury wanted to see the flier_ The prosecutor told the bailiff to repeat his statement to defense counsel, which he did." 146 Wn. App. at 474475. 14 voluntarily chooses to terminate the first trial before the jury's verdict."54 Renton was not "'motivated by bad faith or undertaken to harass or prejudice"' Petitioner, it was impeaching him with a prior statement.55 If he had testified truthfully, the 911 disc would have remained irrelevant. The cases which Petitioner relies on are distinguishable. In State v_ Juarez, after "compelling discovery violations by the State left insufficient time for the defense to meet damaging new evidence within the speedy trial period," and after the court "refused to dismiss the prosecution or to suppress the evidence," the court declared a mistrial after defendant "moved under protest for a continuance."56 In Slate v. Rich, the State rested without anyone identifying the defendant and the court declared a mistrial, sua sponte, and over the defendant's objection. 57 These cases present unusual facts and actions taken by the respective courts. Under State v. Robinson and Oregon v. Kennedy, dismissal based on double jeopardy is inappropriate. The trial court correctly found that Petitioner chose to ask for a mistrial, which was granted and denied his motion to dismiss based on double jeopardy.58 The Commissioner did not 54 State v. Robinson, 146 Wn. App, at 483; citing State v. Wright, 131 Wn. App_ at 484; citing United States x Scott, 437 U.S. at 99. " Oregon v. Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667, 470; 102 S. Ct. 2083; 72 L. Ed. 2d 416 (1982). State v. Juarez, 115 Wn. App. 881, 889; 64 P.3d 83 (Div 1I12003). s' State v. Rich, 63 Wn. App. 743, 746; 821 P.2d 1269 (Div II 1992)- 59 December 1, 2008 Motion hearing before Judge 'ferry Lee Jurado, p. 691. 10 — p. 701. 16 (hereinafter, "Appendinr E"); 15 commit an error by declining to grant review under double jeopardy. 59 G. The prosecutor did not present false testimony. Petitioner claims that the prosecutor knowingly presented false testimony. Both officers testified that they responded to a noise or loud party complaint.b° As noted supra, the officers' sole intent was to locate the missing homeowner as evidenced by the fact that they did not cite or arrest Petitioner that night.61 As to this like his other claims, the Commissioner either found that the issue was inadequately raised below or that Petitioner has not shown error meriting review. 62 H. The doctrine of outrme is not applicable under these facts. The Commissioner agreed with the Court of Appeals that Petitioner's outrage doctrine claim did not merit review.63 in State v. Lively,64 this Court considered police brutality; "employing physical or psychological coercion against the defendant;" "cases where the government conduct is so integrally involved in the offense that the government agents direct the crime from beginning to end, or where the crime is fabricated by the police to obtain a defendant's conviction, rather 59 Ruling Denying Review, p. 2-3. 6° Appendix B 187 I. 16 —1.26; 188 I. 15 _ 1891. 19; 2291. 14. APP � P• P- P- P- 6! Appendix D, p. 3; Appendix B, p. 1971. 12, p. 208 1.23 — p. 2091.22; Appendix A, p. 131 1.18 —p. 132 1. 10. bz Ruling Denying Review, p. 2-3. 63 Ruling Denying Review, p. 2• 64 State v. Lively, 130 Wn.2d 1; 921 P.2d 1035 (1996); Appendix E p. 741. 12 -- 24. 16 than to protect the public from criminal behavior;" and held that "[a] due process claim based on outrageous conduct requires more than a mere demonstration of flagrant police conduct;" as "[d]ismissal based on outrageous conduct is reserved for only the most egregious circumstances."65 There was no Lively -like egregious conduct in this matter. Renton believed that the trial court ruled that the 911 recording was excluded, not any reference to Petitioner's call to 911. Renton asked 12 questions about the call and Petitioner never objected, asked for a clarification, or asked to approach the bench, until Renton asked the perjury -revealing question." Even if this Court believes that it was improper to ask "[a]nd, you told the 911 operator at that time that `[w]e threw a party, and this is how part of this (inaudible)...," it is not similar to police brutality, coercion, or any other examples noted by the Court in Lively. 1. There was no prosecutorial misconduct. To prove prosecutorial misconduct, Petitioner must show under the "totality of the circumstances," and after an objection, that "the prosecutor's comments were improper" and that "a substantial likelihood e5 tate v. Lively, 130 Wn.2d at 13; citing State v_ Myers, 142 Wn.2d 548, 551; 689 P.2d 38 (1984). c6 Appendix A, p. 241 L 9 — A- 242 1.3. 17 exists that the improper statements affected the jury's verdict. ,67 The prosecutor's conduct was proper, and the first jury never had a chance to be affected by the statement because the trial court gave Petitioner a mistrial. With the possible exception of the December 10, 2007 911 recording, Renton complied with each motion in limine ruling at both trlals.68 It is important to note that the Prosecutor raised the issue of the 911 recording before asking any questions specifically to avoid any undue surprise or prejudice. In light of the facts, a mistrial was extreme and the appropriate remedy was a curative instruction. Renton's conduct, did not amount to prosecutorial or egregious misconduct and therefore the Commissioner correctly found that this was not a basis for review,69 J. The, mistrial did not benelrt Renton but did benefit Petitioner and Renton never asked or areued about sexual orientation. Petitioner's list of alleged outrageous conduct spans two trials. Renton offered nearly identical evidence at both trials; incurred the expense of the second trial; and Petitioner had the benefit of having the witnesses' first trial testimony for possible impeachment during the 67 ,State a Lively, 130 Wn.2d at 14; citing United States v. Tobias, 662 F.2d 381, 387 (1981), cert, denied 457 U.S. 1108; 73 L. Ed, 2d 1317; 102 S. Ct. 2908 (1982); State v. Magers, 164 Wn.2d 174, 191; 189 P.3d 126 (2008), citing State v. Gentry, 125 Wn2d 570,640; 888 Ptd 1105 (1995). " Appendix A, p. 71. 1 —p- 131.1 — 13, Appendix Bp- 83 1. 10—p. 102 I. 13. 69 Ruling Denying Review, p_ 3. 18 second trial. The only significant change during the second trial was that Petitioner, aware that Renton had his admission about throwing the party, chose not to testify. Contrary to his claims, only two out of Officer Kordel's thirty - page direct examination refers to the minors' belligerent behavior, and none of the pages that Petitioner cited refer to the sexual orientation for anyone. The trial court did not find the references to the minor's behavior prejudicial .7) This appears to he one of the not clearly raised issues that the Commissioner referred to in his ruling. 71 K. Petitioner should nay Renton's costs for his appeals RAU 93(a) states that a "party that substantially prevails on appeal shall be awarded costs on appeal. (Italics added). RAU 11.2(a). RALJ 11.2(c) states that a "party should devote a section of the brief to the request for the fees or expenses." Renton reiterated its request and the Commissioner stated that "the superior court was authorized to order Mr. Phillips to pay costs."72 6. Conclusion. Renton requests that the Washington State Supreme Court deny Petitioner's Motion to Modify the Commissioner's Ruling. Petitioner has 7' Appendix B, p. 102 1.7. 7 ` Ruling Denying Review, p. 2. 7' Ruling Denying Review, p. 3. 19 not proven that Commissioner Goff applied the incorrect standard in finding that the Court of Appeals correctly applied RAP 13.5(b). RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 8th day of November, 2010. LAWRENCE J. WARREN RENTON CITY ATTORNEY By - - --� Garmon Newsom Il, WSBA #31418 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 12 13 14 Motion for Summary Judgment November 5, 2010 Without Oral Argument BEFORE THE SHORLINES HEARINGS BOARD IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON In re the appeal of Renton's Shoreline Substantial Development Permit LUA10-041, BCM, SM, Brad Nicholson, 15 16 17 V. 18 CITY OF RENTON, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Appellant, Respondent. Case NO. SHB#10-016 Declaration of Vanessa Dolbee in Support of Renton's Motion to for Summary Judgment pursuant to CR56 Vanessa Dolbee hereby declares under penalty of perjury, pursuant to the laws of the State of Washington that the following is true and correct to the best of my knowledge_ 1. That I am over 18 years of age and am competent to testify in this matter. Declaration in Support — Page 1 1�Y Renton City Attorney 100524 St Po Box 626 ♦ ,i + Renton, WA 88057-0626 Phone. 425.255.8678 T� rr0 Fax: 425.255.5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 27 22 23 24 25 2. 1 am a Senior Planner, for Respondent, City of Renton, (hereinafter "Renton") in the above -referenced action. 3. 1 attended and graduated from University of Colorado at Boulder in 2006, with a Bachelor of Environmental Design and a minor in Geography. 4. 1 currently work for the City of Renton as a Senior Planner, and have worked for Renton since 2008- 5. 1 am responsible for overseeing development projects that occur in Renton or that are managed or overseen by Renton. 6. Attached hereto as exhibits are true and correct copies of the following. a. City of Renton Lake Washington Blvd Storm Water System Improvements Neighborhood Map, by Gray & Osborne, Inc., (hereinafter "Exhibit A"); b. City of Renton Land Use Permit Master Application, submitted by Steve Lee, City of Renton Surface Water Utility Department, received by the City of Renton Planning Division June 24, 2010 (hereinafter "Exhibit B"); c. Notice of Application and Proposed Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) (hereinafter "Exhibit C); d. Development Services Division Environmental Check List submitted by Steve tee, June 21, 2010 (hereinafter "Exhibit D"); e. Environmental (SEPA) Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigoted (DNS -M), July 19, 2010 (hereinafter "Exhibit E"); f. Permit for Shoreline Management- Substantial Development Permit, signed by Chip E. Vincent, August 9, 2010 (hereinafter "Exhibit r~'); g. Office of the Hearing Examiner City of Renton, Report and Decision, Fred J. Kaufman, September 10, 2009 (hereinafter "Exhibit G"); and h. Planning & Development Committee, Committee Report, approved by City Council december 7, 2009 (hereinafter "Exhibit H"). 7. Petitioner's Petition for Review allegations are misleading and incorrect. 8. The location that is the subject of Petitioner's claim is illustrated in Exhibit A, the Declaration ill Support — Page 2 �� Renton Glty Attorney �j rtj 100 5 2nd 5t Po Box 626 ♦ „L + Renton, WA 58057-0626 Phone: 425.255.8678 '� TQ Fax.: 425.255.5474 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Lake Washington Blvd Storm Water System Improvements Neighborhood Map. 9. On or about June 24, 2010, Renton filed a Land Use Permit Master Application. (See Exhibit B). The application, identifies the project name as "Lake Washington Blvd N Storm and Water System Improvement Project," "[I]ocated in ROW (Right -of -Way) fronting 4350 Lake Washington Boulevard North, Renton WA 98056." (See Exhibit B, p. 1). 10. On July 1, 2010, a Notice of Application and Proposed Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) (Exhibit Q and an Environmental Check List (Exhibit D) was sent to the Washington State Department of Ecology. The DNS notice stated the following:"SEPA Environmental Review and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the installation of I curb/gutter and portions of a sidewalk, a new storm system, and a water line extension within Lake Washington Boulevard N. to meet the infrastructure needs for future development in the vicinity of the 1-405 Exit 7 area. The project is primarily located within the existing right-of-way I of Lake Washington Blvd. N adjacent to 4350 Lake Washington Boulevard N. However, a small portion for the proposal would extend onto private property located at 4350 Lake Washington Blvd. N." (See Exhibit C, p. 1). The DNS stated that any comments on the "application must be submitted in writing... by 5:00 p.m. on July 15, 2010." (Exhibit C, p. 2) 11. There were no comments to the proposed determination of non -significance by Petitioner or the Department of Ecology. 12. On or about July 19, 2010, the Renton Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued a DNS -M, finding that the project "does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment." (See Exhibit E). The DNS -M stated that appeals of the DNS -M Declaration vi Support — Page 3 Y Renton City Attorney G 100 5 2nd 5t ♦ + PO Box 626 Renton, WA 98057-0626 Phone: 425.255.8678 �N Fax: 425.255.5474 1 2 3 4 5 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 determination "must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on August 6, 2010." 13, On July 21, 2010, 1 sent the Washington State Department of Ecology a letter to inform Ecology of the DNS -M. 14. As of August 6, 2010 neither Petitioner nor the Department of Ecology had appealed the DNS -M. 15. On August 26, 2010, Petitioner appealed the Permit for Shoreline Management - Substantial Development Permit (Exhibit F) to the Shorelines Hearing Board. 16. Contrary to the overall theme of Petitioner's Petition for Review, the "Lake Washington Blvd N Storm and Water System Improvement Project," abutting 4350 Lake Washington Boulevard North, Renton WA 98056, is a separate and distinct project from any proposed project, including the Hawk's Landing Hotel. 17. To the best of Renton's knowledge, Mr. Spencer Alpert, the proponent for the "Hawk's Landing" hotel project, is still attempting to secure financing for his project. 18. Petitioner had a hearing before the Renton Hearing Examiner concerning the { "Hawk's Landing" hotel project. The Hearing Examiner in his September 10, 2009 Report and Decision, p. 19, in section 11, (Exhibit G) concluded that May Creek is a Class 1 shoreline of the state, and that the "proposed development would be outside of the 200 foot threshold and staff determined that it is not subject to' the Shorelines Substantial Development Permit and Shorelines Management regulations. 19. The Hawk's Landing Hotel project appeal process ended on or about December 7, 2009, when the Renton City Council adopted the recommendation of the Planning and Declaration in Support — Page 4 �- 0 Renton City Attorney 148 S 2n° St U B► Po Box 626 Renton, WA 98457-0626 Phone: 425.255.8678 Fait: 425.255.5474 1 2 3 4 5 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1 20 21 22 23 24 25 Development Committee (P&D), and Petitioner did not appeal under LUPA (RCW § 36.70C_040(3)). (see Exhibit H). DATED THIS 3 November 2010, at Renton, Washington. CITY OF RENTON a � Vanessa Dolbee Senior Planner City of Renton j Declaration in Support —Page 5 �* _ Renton City Attorney 100 S 2ntl St PC Box 626 ♦ ,� Renton, WA 98057-0626 Phone: 425.255.8678 N go Fax: 425.255.5474 SCALE= 1"=S00' NE 44TH ,----,-SITE �q ori O BIOSWALE City of Renton CITY OF RENTQN �a >Fmx BLVD SioR smax AND �►A� SW=nc�raav�ns xa��o�oon MAP 1 C3r.� � 04ba�ratie. I� City of Renton .•N4y v1 mento Planning Division LAND USE PERMIT 9,4 1'10!U MASTER APPLICATIOWEaEuvi PROPERTY OWNER(S) TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: NAME: City Of Renton Port Quendall Com pan y(easement/dedication) PROJECT INFORMATION ADDRESS: City ROW in streets and easements: Port Quendall Company, 4350 Lake Washington Blvd North CITY: Renton, WA ZIP:City 98057 Esmts- 98056 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 430-7205 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: City of Renton Surface Water Utility Attn: Steve Lee COMPANY (if applicable): City of Renton ADDRESS: 1055 South Grady Way CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98057 TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-430-7205 slee@rentonwa.gov CONTACT PERSON NAME: Same as Applicant COMPANY (if applicable): CITY: ZIP: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Lake Washington Blvd N Storm and Water System Improvement Project PROJECTIADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: Located in ROW fronting 4350 Lake Washington Boulevard North, Renton, WA 98056 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): City ROW and Private property on: 3224059049 EXISTING LAND USE(S): City ROW and C -Commercial PROPOSED LAND USE(S): NO CHANGE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: City ROW and C -Commercial PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): NA EXISTING ZONING: C PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): C SITE AREA (in square feet): appx. 34000 sf ( appx. 630 LF of new storm pipe x 4 R width ) SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: 3,300 Square Feet SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: NA PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): NA H:1File Sys1SWP - Surface Water PrejectslSWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)127-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks Landing11600 Permits\ECF attachments Hawks LandingNaster Plan Appl.doc 06121/10 PR JECT INFORMA NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): None NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): None NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): None SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): Norte SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA TION contir.. .d NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THF NEW PROJECT (if applicable): NA PROJECT VALUE; $1,200,000.00 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): 0 AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE Q AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO Yes Ll FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq_ ft. lD GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft_ ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. * SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES 6 000 sq. ft. ❑ WETLANDS sq. ft. j LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY I I (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 32 , TOWNSHIP 24N , RANGE 5E W.M. , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Environmental Review $9,000.00 2. Per-n,j -- -%I, oco- ao Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $. 3. 4. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 1, (Print Namels) Sfax T a,; L_C�a- declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or X the auorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. H_ -Vile Sys1SWP - Surface Water PmjectslSWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (C1P)U7-3531 Dice Washington Blvd -Hawks Landing\1600 PermitsTU attachments Hawks LandingNister Plan Appl.doc 06/21/10 .OJECT INFORMATION (continue_, 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that . Ti n!3 _ ','A - 17 *_ L e- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their We and voluntary act for the j uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument (Signature of Owner/Representative) HOP Notary Public in and for the State of Wa ngton r P LN� (Signature of Owner/Representative) V :p.tt _ Notary(Print) . A V"I0,r,r x -`{i �V� !x 1f1'r4,- .V j� � 19-��� y�41t O� W ASV'' My appointment expires: +tf t�11111t���`�`���\`_ H:Tiic Sys1SWP - Surface Water Projez8\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (C1P)127-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks Landing\1600 PeTrnits\ECF attactunents Hawks Landing\Mastnr Plan Appl.doc 06121/10 �' . ' City Of ci //yam NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE; July 1, 2010 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA10-041, ECF, SM PROJECT NAME: Lake Washington Blvd Storm Improvement PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the installation of curb/gutter and portions of a sidewalk, a new storm system, and a water line extension within Lake Washington Blvd. N. to meet the infrastructure needs for future development in the vicinity of the 1-405 Exit 7 area. The project is primarily located within the existing right-of-way cf Lake Washington Blvd. N adjacent to 4350 Lake Washington Blvd. N. However, a small portion for the proposal would extend onto private property located at 4350 lake Washington Blvd_ N. The proposed curb and gutter would extend on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. N. from Ripley Lane N. approximately 600 feet south; and curb, gutter and sidewalk will Continue south on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. N. to connect to the existing bridge over May Creek_ The new storm system would consist of approximately 810 lineal feet of 24 -inch storm pipe with a catch -basin collection system and the new water line extension would consist of about 1,450 feet of 12 -inch water line in Lake Washington Blvd. N. from NE 40th St to NE 44th St The project also includes a wet bioswale, approximately 140 lineal feet The applicant has provided stream and wetland studies, a traffic study, a geotechnical report, and a hydrologic analysis with their application. PROJECT LOCATION: Rt Q -W fronting 4350 Lake Washington Blvd N & a small section on subject site OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.210.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non -Significance (DNS). A14 -clay appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE. June 24, 2010 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 1, 2010 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON; Steve Lee, Chy of Renton; Emil- siee@rentonwa.gov PermWileview Requested: Environmental (SEPA] Review, Shoreline Sub ntial Development Permit Other Permits which may be required: Construction Permit Requested Studies: Stream Study, Hydrologic Analysis, and Geotechnical Study Location where application may be reviewed: Departmerd of Community & Economic Development (CED} — Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City iiaR,1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED —Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Lake Washington Blvd Storm lmprovement/LUA10-041, ECF, STJT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: PUBLIC HEARING: N/A CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Ilse. The subject site is designated Commercial/ Office/ Residential (COR) on the City of Renton Comprehensive land Use Map and Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the Gty's SEPA ordinance, RMC 43-090, RMC 4-7- 070, RMC 4-9-190 and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Vanessa Dolbee, (Acting) Senior Planner, CEO — Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5-.W PM on July IS, 2010. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project CONTACT PERSON: Vanessa Dolbee, (Acting) Senior Planner; Tel: (425) 431]-737.4; Eml: vdolbee@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST,'!y City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: Ren#on bivislon a4 <,,o The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions.. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce .or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not knot/ or "does not apply'. Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that *11 help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply_" IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area,' respectively. . H:1File Sys\SWP - Surface Water ProjectstSWP 2T -.Surface Water Projects (CIP)127-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks f_anding11600 Permits ECF attachments Hawks k.andinglSEPA GhecIftt-Final-S'Tedited 100621.doc A. BACKGROUND Name of proposed project, if applicable: Lake Washington Blvd. Hawks Landing Storm and Water System Improvement Project 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton Surface Water utility, Attn: Steve Lee 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: City of Renton Surface Water Utility Attn: Steve Lee 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 425-430-7205 4. Date checklist prepared: June 2010 5. Agency requesting checklist; City of Renton Development Services Division S. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Submit Environmental Checklist: June 2010 Advertise project for Bids: August 2010 Construction: October 2010 7. Ido you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The adjacent parcel located on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd., south of NE 44'" St., may be developed into a hotel. The developer is proposing to install the remaining frontage improvements (landscaping and sidewalk) in front of this property. Any portions of this project that does not get completed shall be completed by the hotel developer including the remaining landscape plantings along the frontage. B. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Wetland/Stream Study: Hawk's Landing Crowne Plaza Hotel prepared by Graham -Bunting Associates on May 12, 2009. A Geotechnical Report for the existing soil conditions and construction recommendations was prepared by Soil & Environmental Engineers Inc. on March 17, 2010. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the properly covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton Shoreline Permit, Grading Permit and Right -of -Way Use Permit. H. -Tile 5yslSWP - Surface Water ProjectslSWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)127-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks Landing115DO PenmitsiEU attachments Hawks LandingZEPA Checklist-FnakSTLedlted 100621.doc 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The purpose of the project is to install curblgutter and portions of a sidewalk, a new storm system, a retrofit water quality facility and a water line extenslon along Lake Washington Blvd. N. to meet the infrastructure needs for future development in the vicinity of 1-405 Exit T area, including the Hawks Landing development. The curb and gutter will extend on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. N. from Ripley Lane N. approximately 600 feet south; and curb, gutter and sidewalk will continue south from 270 feet north of.the May Creek Bridge on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd, N. and connect to the existing sidewalk north of the May Creek Bridge. The stormwater system will collect road, curb, gutter, and sidewalk runoff and provide water quality treatment for a portion of the.existing Lake Washington Boulevard roadway prior to discharge to an existing stormwater pipe that discharges to May Creek, The new storm system will consist of approximately 810 lineal feet of 24" storm pipe with a catch basin collection system capable of carrying traffic loading. The project also includes a wet bioswale approximately 940 lineal feet (top lengthy which will be used to treat a portion of the runoff from Lake Washington Blvd. N. Water quality (and quantity) treatment follows the 2009 City of Renton Stormwater Design Manual that follows the 2005 Ecology Stormwater Design Manual. The water line extension consists of the installation of about 1,450 feet of 12 -inch water line in Lake Washington Blvd. N. from NE. 40"' St. to NE 44'" St. A 100' portion of the water line will be installed inside an existing 18 -inch steel casing within the May Creek Bridge. it is anticipated that existing utilities may be in conflict with the proposed work and therefore relocation of some existing facilities and utilities is expected. Conflicts may Include PSE poles, fiber optics, Qwest lines, Comcast, and other franchise utilities. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, If any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist The project is located In the NW quarter of Section 32, Township 24N, Range 5E in the City of Renton, lung County, Washington. Latitude 47.53055 N, Longitude 122.20035 W. The new storm system, cuirb, gutter, and sidewalk will be begin near the east side of the intersection of Ripley Lane and Lake Washington Blvd North. The system will extend along the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. to a point just north of the May Creek Bridge. The water main is near the same alignment however, it will be located under the east half of Lake Washington Blvd. and will extend under the May Creek Bridge to a point 450' south of the bridge. See the attached figures and plans. HARle Sys1SWP - Surface Water Prajects%SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (C[P)127-3531 Lake Washington Btud-Hawks 3 Landingli600 PermitslECF attachments Hawks LandinglSEPA ChedcGst-Final-STLadlied 100621_ = B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 9. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . Gently sloped. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Approximately 3 % c_ What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? if you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soils in the area are classified as Norma Sandy Loam by the Soil Conservation Service King County Soil Survey. Norma Sandy Loam is described as soil that has low runoff potential and high infiltration rates that consist of deep, well to excessively drained sands or gravels and have a high rate of water transmission. A geotechnical report for the area found fill consisting of silty sand with gravel to a depth of about 6 feet which was underlain by very loose to loose sand with lenses of very soft sift to a thickness of 20 feet below the fill. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Norse known e. -Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. About 2,380 cubic yards will be cut and approximately 2,450 cubic yards will be used for fill. The contractor will supply the backfill from licensed gravel pits. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Surface erosion may occur along the slope of the ditch in the northern section however, the contractor will be required to use typical erosion control methods described in the 2009 City of Renton Stormwater Design Manual (which follows the 2005 Ecology Stormwater Manual) to control erosion from the excavation and any soil stockpiles. Flow in the existing storm system will be diverted around the work area. g. About what percent of the site will. be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 61.9% of the drainage area for this project will be covered with Impervious surfaces which is an increase over the 57.2% that exists today. H7 Fje Sys1SWP - Surface Water Projects%SWP-27 - Surface Water projects (CIP)127-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks 4 Landing11600 PerrntsT=CF attachments Hawks Landingl.SEPA Checklist-Final-,STLedited 106627.doc h_ Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The contractor will be required to use typical erosion control methods In the City of Renton 2009 Storrnwater Design Manual (document follows the 2005 Ecology Manual BMPS), Including filter fabric fences and catchbasin inlet protection. Stormwater will be diverted around the work area, and sandbags and silt fencing will be used to keep any water and sediment out of the open channel. 2. AIR What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? if any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, dust and exhaust from construction equipment will occur. After construction, no emissions are expected from the site, b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. Construction equipment will have mufflers and exhaust systems in good working order. Dust will be kept down by watering the excavation and stockpiles as needed. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into_ Yes, May Creek is within the vicinity of the project and is considered a Class 1 (City system classification) stream. A wetland evaluation was performed where the existing storm water system discharges to the open channel. The evaluation found that the area did not meet the criteria to be classified as a wetland and was reviewed as part of the adjacent hotel developer's determination. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The downstream part of the new 24" storm system is within 60 feet of May Creek. The new 24" storm system will connect to an existing 24" CMP pipe that will continue to discharge to May Creek. The creek Itself will not be disturbed during construction of this project. Best management practices will be conducted to ensure the creek is protected from sediment flowing downstream during construction. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill or dredge will be placed within May Creek. Fill will be located in the bitch where the current stormwater discharges to along HAFIEe SysLSWP - Surface Water Projec tslSWP-27 - Surface Water Prajects (CIP)Q7-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks Landing11600 Permb\ECF attachments hawks LandbgZEPA Checklist-Final-S7Ledded 100621.dor: the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. About 2,380 cubic yards will be cut and approximately 2,450 cubic yards will be used for fill throughout the project area. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal fie within a 100 -year flood plain? If so, note location on the site pian_ No, the project site is located approximately 55 feet outside of the 100 -year flood plain. The project will also Involve going through an existing 18" sleeve underneath May Creek bridge. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. If there is a high water table which affects construction excavation temporary Pumping would be needed to keep the excavation dry. Any groundwater would be filtered to remove sediment and discharged back to the downstream storm system through the use of sediment and erosion control best management practices. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A.. C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. The Hawk's Landing area is located at the downstream end of a 15 -acre basin that mostly consists of impervious pavement from I4o5, NE W St., and the existing development on the Hawk's Landing site. For existing conditions the peak flow from the basin for the 100 -year, 24-hour storm is approximately 12 cfs. The majority of the storm water runoff from the basin is currently carried by a 24 - inch pipe, which begins near a depressed area located south of the Intersection of Lake Washington Blvd. N. and Ripley LanefNE 44th. The 24 -inch pipe conveys flows to the northwest edge of the proposed Hawk's Landlttg development whereIt then enters a 450 -foot long ditch. This ditch Is connected to a 24" CMP pipe that is 120Aneal feet and discharges directly to May Creek at a point approximately 1,100 feet upstream of Lake Washington. 2) Could. waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. HAFile Sys1SWP- Surface Water ProjectMSM-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)%27-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks � Landing11600 PermhsECF attachments Hawks LandinglSEPA Checklist- final-STLedited 10%21.doc Any liquid spills on site could enter the drainage system. The same potential exists with the current drainage system. Best management practices will be. in place to limit impacts. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: No new impacts are expected. The City of Renton Maintenance Department would respond to any problems with the storm system or Hquid spills in City ROW. The project Includes the construction of a wet bio swale to treat storm water runoff from Lake Washington Boulevard. Sediment and erosion control standards follow the adopted 2009 City of Renton Stormwater Design Manual (2009 KCSWDM). 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: aider, maple, aspen, other possibly cottonwood, aspen, alder X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other possibly small fir or pine trees X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, builrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, rnilfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Vegetation (weeds, long grass and some cattails) within the existing ditch will be replaced with fill. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The proposed wet bioswale located Just upstream from May Creek will Include plants that are tolerant of saturated conditions. Grass will be used within the planter strips. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds. hawk, heron, eagle. songbirds, other small birds In general Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Typical small mammals such as mice, muskrats and squirrels may be present Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other _Chinook. Coho. Sockeye. Steelhead and Cutthroat. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. HIFfle Sys\SWP - Surface Water Pm1ecdslSWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)127-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks Landingll600 PernitslECP attachments Hawks L.andingZEPA Checklist-Fw aFSTLedited 1 D0621.doc Puget Sound Chinook Salmon and Puget Sound Steelhead in May Creek are a threatened species. G. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildiife, if any.' NA. HARe Sys1SWP - Surface Water Pro)actslSWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CEP)V7-3537 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks tandingkI SW Permtts\ECF attachments Hawks LandinglSEPA ChecklW-Fina)STLedited 1 D0521.doc 5. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed .project's energy needs? Descdbe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None needed for the completed project. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally. describe. No. C. What kinds of energy conservation features are 'included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. NA. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. During construction fuel and ol( spills could occur. �) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Typical emergency services by the Fire Department and the City Maintenance Division in case of fire, injury, or fuel spills. 2) . Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. The Contractor will be required to keep construction equipment in good operating condition, and will be responsible to cleanup any oil or fuel leaks and spills, and repair leaking equipment. Operators will be trained in the -use of onsite spill kits. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would. be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term: Noise from construction equipment may occur between the hours of 7 AM to 5 PM, Monday through Friday during construction. There will be no long term noise Impacts. All noise impacts would be contained within the City's neighborhood work time and dates. I HAFiie Sys1SWP - Surface Water Prx jectslSWP-27 - du6ce Water Projects (CEP)127-3531 Lake Washington Stvd-Hawks 9 LandingMW Permitsll=CF attachments Hawks Landing%SEPA Checkfist-Fina}-STLedh&d 1 D0621.doc 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The contractor will be required to keep the construction equipment's mufflers and exhaust systems in good operating condition. a. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site consists of a paved road. The adjacent property currently houses abandoned buildings and parking lots. The site is proposed to be developed into a hotel. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? if so, describe. No. C. Describe any structures on the site. No structures exist on the project site itself except for the May Creek bridge. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Portions of the existing storm system will be removed and replaced, or abandoned. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -Commercial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial Office Residential (COR) g. If applicable, what js the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. A wetland report obtained by the City does not classify the existing ditch as a wetland. A letter has been written for the Army Corps describing this area as a ditch. i. Appro)dmately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? NA j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NA k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NA HAFile Sys4SVJP - Surface Water Projects�SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (C1P)Q7-9631 Lake Washington 13tvd-Hawks 10 Landing116DO PermitstiECF attachments Hawks LandinglSEPA Checklist-FinakSTLedited 1 OD621.doc Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project replaces an existing stormwater drainage system with a new storm system that will have adequate flow capacity. The water main will provide better water quality in the future and allow development to occur. The new storm system will be under ground and the asphalt street will be restored to its existing use. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income. housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing_ None c_ Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,'if any: NA 10. AESTHETICS a_ What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed.. The utilities will be under ground and the curb will be less than a foot taller than the existing pavement. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control. aesthetic impacts, if any: The wet bioswale will be planted with appropriate vegetation and the planter strips will contain grass or other appropriate landscaping vegetation. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Gould light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. NA HArsle SysLSWP - Surface Water ProjectsWWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)T7-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks 1 Landingl1608 Perin is ECF attachments Hawks LandinglSEPA Checklist-F1nalSTLedW 100621. dor, 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NA 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: In the event any materials of historic cultural or archaeological significance are encountered during construction, construction shall be stopped and the Dept. of Archaeology Historic Preservation and appropriate tribes shall be consulted. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by Lake Washington Blvd N. and NE 44th St. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. Metro serves a park n' ride lot at 3Q"' and Park, approximately a mile and a half north of the project area. C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe {indicate whether public or private? KAFle Sys1SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects {CIP}127-3531 lake Washington Blvd-Fiawks 12 Landing11600 Permits\ECF attachments Hawks LandinglSEPA Checklist-Final-STLedited 100621.doc Safety along lake Washington Blvd. N. will improve by adding curb, gutter, and sidewalks. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If -so, generally describe. No - How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? if known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NA 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts an public services, if any. Safety will be Improved along the Lake Washington Blvd. by adding curb, gutter and sidewalks. The new water and storm services will serve adjacent development 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, natural gas, water, and telephone, are available. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The new 24 -inch stormwater pipes and water quality Facility will be owned by the City of Renton in City ROW, or in easements granted by the private property owners. The new storimwater system will be installed in trenches excavated in the asphalted street or in City ROW. A new 12 -inch water pipe is proposed within City ROW and existing asphalted street. The new water pipe will reduce to 10 -inch diameter steel in order to sleeve within the existing 12 -inch steel pipe located on the May Creek Bridge. Construction will be provided by the C"rty of Renton through private contractors via state bidding laws. H;Wile SysISWP - Surface Water ProjectsZWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)127-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks 13 Landing11600 PermitslECF attachments Hawks Landtng\SEPA Checklist-Final-STLedited I4o621.doc C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Date: ZI Z-0/0 HAFile Sys1SWP - Surface Water ProjectslSWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)127-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks 14 Landing11600 PermitsECF attachments Hawks LandinglSEPA Chartist-FinalSTLedited 100621.doc D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air, production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fists, or marine life are: How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural - sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? H:1Re Sys1SWP - Surface Water Projec#s1SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CJP)127-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks 15 Landing11600 PermitslECF attachments Hawks Landing\SEPA Cheddist-Final-STI-edited t o0621.doc Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: fi. Flow would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment SIGNATURE 1, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it blight issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part Proponent: Dame Printed: Date: EWCHLSi_DOC REVISED 6188 H_1File SysLSWP - Surface Water ProjectslSWP-27 - surface Water Projects (CIPN7-3531 Lake Washington Blvd -Hawks 16 Landing\1 BDO PermitslECF attachments Hawks LandinglSEPA Checklist-Final-STLedlted 100621.doc DEPARTMENT OF CDhIITY ciryof, __AUN_ AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT � PLANNING DIVISION SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT EVALUATION FORM & DECISION . DATE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE: LAND USE ACTION FILE NO.: DATE RECEIVED DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: TYPE OF ACTION(S): August 9, 2010 LUA10-041, ECR, SM June 24, 2010 July 1, 2010 ® Substantial Development Permit ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, staff recommends that the City of Renton grant a Substantial Development Permit. This action is proposed on the following application: PROJECT NAME: Lake Washington Blvd. Storm Improvements PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee, (Acting) Senior Planner OWNER: City of Renton, City right-of-way, Renton, WA 98057; and Port Quendall Company, 4350 Lake Washington Blvd. N, Renton, WA 98057 APPLICANT/CONTACT: City of Renton Surface Water Utility, Attn: Steve Lee, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 PROJECT LOCATION: In existing ROW fronting 4350 Lake Washington Blvd. N LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Within the ROW of Sec. 32, Twn. 24, R. 5 E SEC-TWN-R: Sec. 32, Twn. 24, R. 5 E WITHIN THE SHORELINES OF: May Creek APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: City of Renton PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: The purpose of the project is to install curb/gutter and portions of a sidewalk, a new storm system, and a water line extension within Lake Washington Blvd. N. to meet the infrastructure needs for future development in the vicinity of the 1-405 Exit 7 area, including the Hawks Landing development. The proposed infrastructure's design expands beyond the existing City of Renton Deportment of Com ity & Economic development Shoreline Management Permit Lake Washington Blvd Storm Improvements LUA10-041, FCR, SIVE DATE OF PERMIT: August 9, 2010 Page 2 of right-of-way(ROW), therefore, a portion of the development would occur on private property located on.the east side of Lake Washington Blvd, N. The small portion of the project that would occur outside of the existing ROW would be located on the site commonly known as the Pan Abode Site (Tax Parcel# 3224059049, 4350 Lake Washington Blvd. N). The following list describes each part of the proposed project: Curb and Gutter: The curb and gutter would extend on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd_ N. from Ripley Lane N. approximately 600 feet south; and curb, gutter and sidewalk would continue south on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. N. to connect to the existing bridge over May Creek. • Pervious Sidewalk: The sidewalk would be installed from approximately 270 -feet north of the May Creek Bridge to the existing May Creek Bridge sidewalk connection. The sidewalk is proposed to be 12 -feet wide with a 10 -foot landscape strip behind the curb and be made of porous concrete. • Stormwater S stem: The stormwater system would collect road, curb, gutter, and sidewalk runoff and provide water quality treatment for a portion of the existing road prior to discharging to an existing stormwater system flowing to May Creek. The new storm system would consist of approximately 810 lineal feet of 24 -inch storm pipe with a catch -basin collection system capable of carrying traffic loading. • Wet Bio Swale: The project also includes a wet bio swale, approximately 140 lineal feet (top length) of which, will be used to treat a portion of the runoff from Lake Washington Blvd. N. One 20 -foot wide gravel maintenance access road is proposed off of Lake Washington Blvd. N. The landscape strip is proposed to terminate just north of the maintenance access road. + Water Line: The water line extension consists of the installation of about 1,450 feet of 12 -inch water line in Lake Washington Blvd. N_ from NE 40th 5t. to NE 44th St. A 100 - foot portion of the water line will be installed inside an existing 18 -inch steel casing within the May Creek Bridge. The reach of May Creek near the project site has been designated as an Urban Shoreline Pursuant to the City's SMP. May Creek runs through the south end of project area; it flows under Lake Washington Blvd. N into Lake Washington approximately 0.25 miles southwest of the subject property. The downstream portion of the new storm system is within 60 feet of May Creek and the new water line will cross May Creek in an existing 18 -inch steel casing located within the May Creek Bridge. Under current conditions stormwater directly discharges into May Creek from the existing road side ditch. After the proposed project completion, discharge would remain in May Creek however, the subject project includes the addition of a wet bio swale to treat stormwater runoff prior to discharge into May Creek. Moreover, the subject project would result in improvements in the water quality discharging into the creek_ The applicant has indicated that the creek itself would not be disturbed during construction and best management practices would be conducted to ensure the creek is protected from sediment flowing downstream during construction. No fill or dredge is proposed to be placed within May Creek. City of Renton Department of Com ity & Economic Development Shoreline Management Permit Cake Washington Blvd Storm Improvements LUA10-041, ECR, SM DATE OF PERMIT: August 9, 2010 Page 3 of 4 The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: RMC Section Description 8me- 4-3-090J Urban Environment 3-25 4-3-090K General Use Regulations for All Shoreline Uses 3-25 4-3-090L Specific Use Regulations 3-27 Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions of State Agencies. 2. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the SEPA Environmental Review for the subject project. This Permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition(s) hereof. 3. Construction permits shall not be issued until twenty-one (21) days after approval by the Washington State Department of Ecology or until any review proceedings initiated within this twenty-one (21) day review period have been completed. r C. E. "Chip" Vincent, Planning Director Date Planning Division APPEALS: Appeals of Shoreline Substantial Development Permit issuance must be made directly to the Shorelines Hearings Board. Appeals are made by filing a request in writing within the twenty-one (21) days of receipt of the final order and concurrently filing copies of such request with the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's office as provided in section 18(i) of the Shorelines Management Act of 1971. All copies of appeal notices shall also be filed with the City of Renton Planning Division and the City Clerk's office. EXPIRATION: Unless a different time period is specified in the shoreline permit as authorized by RCW 90.55.143 and subsection J1 of RMC 4-9-190, construction activities, or a use or City of Renton .Oepartment of Co-. .nity & Economic Development Shoreline Management permit Lake Washington Blvd. Storm Improvements t11Aip 043, ECR, SM DATE OF PERMIT: August 9, 2010 Page 4 of 4 activity, for which a permit has been granted pursuant to this Master Program must be commenced within two (2) years of the effective date of a shoreline permit, or the shoreline permit shall terminate, and a new permit shall be necessary. However, the Planning Division may authorize a single extension for a period not to exceed one year based on reasonable factors, if a request for extension has been filed with the Planning Division before the expiration date, and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of record and the Washington State Department of Ecology. DEFINITION OF COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES: the construction applications must be submitted, permits must be issued, and foundation inspections must be completed before the end of the two (2) year period. Attachments: A. Neighborhood Detail Map CC. Attorney General's Office Owner(s)/Applicant—City of Renton & Port Quendall Company Contact— City of Renton Surface Water Utility, Steve Lee City of Renton Official File C(Iy Of Renton Plaoning Division 4 Q CITY OF RENTON LAEg VASEMiGTON BLVD STORM AND ■ATXR ffySTM BUWVElD:1+1T"3 NgGHBDR13DDD M" OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXANIINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION f September 10, 2009 APPELLANTS: Brad Nicholson South End Gives Back (SEGB) Represented by. Keith Scully OWNER: Port Quendall Company Attn: Steve Van Til 505 Union Station, 505 Fifth Ave S., Ste. 900 Seattle, WA 98104 APPLICANT/CONTACT: Spencer Alpert Alpert International, LLP 10218 Richwood Ave NW Seattle, WA 98177 Represented by: Jack McCullough 701 5t Avenue, Ste. 7220 Seattle, WA 98104 RESPONDENT: City of Renton Azul Nielsen, Assistant City Attorney File No.: LUA 09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H LOCATION: 4350 Lake Washington Blvd North SUMMARY OF APPEAL AND LAND USE ACTION: Appeal of SEPA Determination and request for Master Site Plan Review and Site Plan Review for a 5 -story, 60 -foot high, 122,000 square foot, 173 -morn hotel. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Appellant's written request for a hearing and examining available information on tile, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: NIINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the August 25, 2009 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, August 25, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. Parties present: Ann Nielsen, Assistant City Attorney representing City of Renton Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner, Development Services Keith Scully, Attorney representing Appellant Brad Nicholson and SEGB Hawk's Landing Mixed Lse and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 2 Jack McCullough and Jessie Clawson, Attorneys representing Alpert International, LLP The following exhibits were entered into the record for the SEPA Appeal: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file, LUA-09-060, ECF, SA- M, SA -H containing the original application, various reports, correspondence file, SEPA documents, SEPA Appeal and Staff analysis. Exhibit A. Vicinity Map Exhibit B: Site Plan Exhibit C: Ask Fred what he wrote down! Exhibit No. 2: Notice of Appeal with Attachments A- L Exhibit No. 3: Notice of Supplemental Brief and Attachments Exhibit No. 4: Larger Overview of Vicinity Map Exhibit N2,5: Close-up of Vicinity Ma Exhibit D: Existing Condition of Site Exhibit E: Deconstruction Plan Exhibit F: Post Deconstruction Plan Exhibit G: Site Utili Plan Exhibit H: Grading Plan Exhibit I: Dan Mitzel Biography Exhibit J: Sound Design Group LLC Exhibit K. TIR The Examiner stated that today the Hawks Landing Land Use, LUA-09-060 hearing for a Master Site Plan and Site Plan Review, and a SEPA Appeal filed by SEG13 and Brad Nicholson, who are challenging the SEPA Determination by the City would be heard. The SEPA appeal will be first followed by the Land Use. The Examiner asked for preliminary remarks: Ann Nielsen stated that in the submissions by the appellant in the initial notice of appeal, along with their supplemental brief, appellants raised an issue in regards to the Master Site Plan, the City and the applicant did respond to that issue. The Master Site Plan and the Site Plan hearing is separate and apart from the SEPA appeal, those issues raised that pertain to the Master Site Plan and Site Plan should be stricken and barred from the SEPA appeal hearing. Keith Scully stated that he did not disagree with Ms. Nielsen, his document should have been titled differently in order to separate the two hearings. It was agreed by all parties to strike the Master Site Plan and Site Plan issues from the SEPA appeal hearing. Vanessa Dolbee stated that the site is located at 4350 Lake Washington Blvd North and is a 7.8 acre parcel, however the project site is only 3.07 acres in the northern part of Renton in the COR zone just north of May Creek. It is east of Lake Washington Boulevard, and south and west of 1-405. The project proposes to build a hotel on the site that would include retail space, a fitness center, a spa and a restaurant. The building would be 60 -feet high and 5 stories. It would be a total of 122,000 square feet with 173 rooms and a 124 space surface parking lot in addition to an underground parking garage. The hotel would be located in the northwestern corner of the project. Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal 1~ile No_: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 3 There are two wetlands associated with May Creek, both are to the north of May Creek. One wetland is 63 feet from the property line where the development will take place. The other one is approximately 117 feet south of the property line of the developed site. The Shoreline Master Program would have different buffers depending on the use, the Shoreline jurisdiction is invoked if development is within 200 feet of May Creek, all the proposed development is outside of that 200 foot area. Keith Scully, Gendler and Mann asked to submit all the attachments to their Notice of Appeal Hearing Brief and a Notice of Supplemental Evidence_ Included within the attachments are Declarations from Dr. Massmann and Mr. Nicholson. They do not need to repeat everything if the Examiner would be willing to accept them in lieu of live testimony. They are present, if there should be cross examination, they would be willing to answer any questions that there may be. Dr. Joel Massmann. 6520 E Mercer Way, Mercer Island, WA 98040. Upon questioning by Mr. McCullough, Dr_ Massrnann stated that his declaration represented his continents on this pending application. In paragraph 3 on page 2 where it states that 85% of the impervious surface was taken out of the plans leaving the assumption that there would be a potential for a reduction of 4 acres in impervious surface on this site. His analysis in his declaration was based on that potential. The impervious surface over the larger site, beyond the 3.7 acres is actually less than 85°1x. The assumption was that any land that was currently impervious and it became pervious the recharge onto that portion would become ground water. Rain Gardens would also infiltrate at a rate typical of soils in this part of the county. Up2n quesfioning by Mr. Scully, Dr. Massmann stated that 4 acres of impervious surface could be deconstructed and would then infiltrate at a rate typical of soils in this part of the county. If it would be less than 4 acres you could simply divide that ratio by the actual amount of impervious surface. A Rain Garden is a place to collect surface water runoff' and store it to potentially infiltrate the water. There may be less infiltration in a Rain Garden due to the plants that would transpire, they are roughly similar to simple surface water runoff, and there would be less recharge in the Rain Gardens because of evapotranspiration. Keith Scull v stated that Mr. Nicholson was also present and his Declaration was part of the record. If there were no questions for Mr. Nicholson, he would not be called to testify. There were no questions for Mr. Nicholson. It is their burden to show that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts that clearly shows that an Environmental Impact Statement should have been ordered, rather than what did happen when the City decided that there were no probable significant adverse environmental impacts. The point of an EIS is to study the exact impacts. One of those is not available, they cannot tell exactly what will happen should this project be developed. They must show that it is more likely than not that it is probable that something bad is going to happen to the environment if this pian goes forward as designed. On SEPA, they are resting on one point and that is the stormwater. It rains all the time in Washington, there is a ton of water that any site must deal with. This particular site is 85% impermeable and currently there are some old warehouses and a bunch of pavement. When you have a site like this, and you take away pavement and permeable surface that rain water can simply go through into ground water rather than landing on and flowing off. Usually that is an unmitigated good thing and usually fights over developments like this in that there is not enough ground water recharge, there would be too much water flowing off the site and flowing into water bodies like May Creek or into the drainage ditch that carries the water off the site. This site is unique and SEPA requires looking at not just how most sites would affect the environment but how this particular site impacts the environment. Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 4 The goal of SEPA is not to make things slightly better than they used to be, but to create a document that lets the decision maker really understand the environmental impacts of the proposal- The question is, is there going to be a probable significant adverse environmental impact? This is not the case of sample sites described in the Surface Water Design Manual, where more water flowing into the ground is automatically a good thing. Because of where this site is located, there are residential and commercial properties to the south, there are freeways close by, a residential development to the west and close to the site is the Quendall terminal which is loaded with chemicals and toxic soils that move via groundwater to the lake. There are hot spots of environmental contaminants in Lake Washington that have been flushed from the land. With this project, pavement will be torn out, buildings will be deconstructed, Rain Gardens will be added, which will absorb some of the water but not enough, there will be landscaping added and impervious surfaces will be dug up and replaced with a different impervious surface and permeable surfaces. The rain that currently flows on this site is channeled to a drainage ditch and on to May Creek, more of that is going to be going into the ground than previously. With this new construction, all water will now go directly to the Quendall site and add toxins to Lake Washington. An EIS would tell how much of an impact this new construction would have on existing water flow and Lake Washington. In order to begin construction on this site, they will need to dig a de -watering trench to drain the site while they use construction equipment. This ground is already saturated, there would be more ground water flow during the construction_ They may need to add catch basins in order to flow water to May Creek without more toxins from the surface. The Appellant is asking for a finding of probably significant adverse environmental impact and asks that this be remanded back for a Determination of Significance and an Environmental Impact Statement. Ms. Nielsen waived an opening statement, the City will present their information via a presentation by the project manager, Vanessa Dolbee. She will then join with the applicant in any specific presentation with respect to the stormwater issues. Vanessa Dolbee stated that the City did receive an application from Spencer Alpert of Alpert International, LLP for a SEPA Environmental Review, Master Site Plan and Site Plan Review for the Hawk's Landing Hotel, the applicant did provide all documents required by Renton Code. The SEPA review returned a Determination of Significance — Mitigated with 10 mitigation measures. The site is vacant, but used to be the home of Pan Abode Cedar Homes. All of the buildings on the site will be deconstructed with the exception of the one building on the south. That building does have a corner within the 200 -foot shoreline.' The hotel and parking will be located in the northwest corner of the site. Mitigation measures 3 and 4 require the applicant to comply with the 2005 King County Storm Water Design Manual in addition to providing erosion and sediment control per Department of Ecology during construction. Upon -questioning _-by Mr_ Scully. Ms. Dolbee stated that the white space shown on Exhibit G is in general impervious surface. It is old concrete and other buildings as well as other items left on the site. Discussion was had regarding the materials left on the site, whether the hotel would face those leftover materials. The Examiner inquired as to what was going to happen to the rest of the white space_ Mr. Scully continued stating that in fact, the City does not know what is going to happen with all the stuff remaining on the site. Hawk's Lauding Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 5 Ms. Dolbee stated that based on the submittal documents, she believed that the areas not marked "TBR" would not be removed. There is no condition that requires them to leave that area impervious. There also has been no document issued at this point by the City regulating that space outside the development area. A permit would be required to do any type of work on the site. There is nothing in the plans that states what will happen to the soil under the buildings that are to be removed. Mr. McCulloggh stated that they would defer any opening statement and called Mr. Mitzel to testify_ Dan Mitzel 111 i Cleveland Avenue, Mt. Vernon, WA 98273 stated that he was developing this site in conjunction with Spencer Alpert of Alpert International. He is the developer for the hotel and has been active in the real estate business since 1977 and active in the hotel business since 1984. About a year ago he got together with Mr. Alpert and starting discussing possibilities of developing this site for a hotel that would work in conjunction with the Seattle Seahawks. An agreement was entered into with the Seahawks to build a hotel that would be considered the official hotel for the Seattle Seahawks, it was very important that they have a hotel that was within close proximity to the VMAC Center and training center. Upon questioning by Mr. McCullough. Mr. Mitzel stated that the plan was to remove the buildings, leave the concrete slabs under the buildings and leave the asphalt that surrounds the buildings so that the impervious areas are mimicking the existing conditions in the area outside of where the hotel will occur. There will not be 4 acres of new pervious surface in the area of this new construction. The portion of the site that is impervious will remain very similar to its present condition. There is no plan to change the existing square footage of impervious surface in the area unrelated to the hotel development. All buildings are sitting on concrete slabs. The hotel that will be built on this site will have some rooms looking to the east and southeast. Those views would be essentially of asphalt and concrete, there might be a minor amount of general cleanup that happens, the site is not a junk yard, rather a series of buildings that will be taken down, the slabs will be left, the asphalt will be left and that will be the condition they must deal with in terms of the view from some of the rooms, it is not perfect or ideal, but neither is looking at the freeway. They feel it is a condition they are willing to live with and they are willing to take that risk. Upon questioning by Mr. Scully, Mr. Mitzel, stated that the entire site is under their control under a real estate purchase and sale agreement. It is one tax parcel. They operate hotels in many different conditions. The premium rooms will be looking at Lake Washington. At this point they have not begun to obtain their demolition permits. There have been no specific conditions about how they leave the area that does not include the project area_ Nothing will be removed outside the project area. Pat Severin. Sound Development Group, LLC, 15214 Avon -Allen Road, Mt. Vernon, WA 98273. Upon questioning by Mr. McCullough, Mr. Severin identified a statement of qualifications for Sound Development Group. He has been an engineer in the Skagit Valley for 10-12 years and been practicing engineering since 1989 and licensed since 1995. Mr. Severin was contacted by Mr. Mittel to provide engineering and surveying services for the project. They addressed storm drainage, utility designs, site layout and grading plans for the site. They worked with the project architect to develop a site plan that was aesthetically pleasing and functions from a utility standpoint. Exhibits E and G are true depictions of the existing conditions and post development conditions of the site_ Rain Gardens have a two -fold function, it is a point of collection for stormwater, it provides water quality treatment and in some cases infiltration to actually dispose of stormwater runoff. This site is only using Rain Gardens for the treatment of the water, they do not intend to infiltrate any water in the Rain Garden area. The T1R for this project contained a diagram of the Rain Garden Treatment System. After the water was collected Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 6 in the Rain Garden it flows into the drainage system and out to May Creek where it currently discharges. There would be a collection pipe at the bottom of the Rain Garden to receive all the surface water that percolates through the Rain Garden down to the drain rock below. The bottom of the Rain Garden would be lined. Per the King County Manual, they are required to treat pollution generating impervious surfaces, which is primarily asphalt and some concrete surfaces and that is what they are collecting. Roof waters are typically considered not a pollution generating impervious surface, that water will be collected and diverted to the ditch in a separate system. Per the King County Manual, impervious surfaces are actually considered asphalt, concrete and typically graveled surfaces, even if it were all to be removed, which the applicant does not intend to do, it would still be considered impervious_ Pre -development to post -development, all the water would be discharged to the ditch much as it is today. The only difference is that they are treating the stormwater runoff and the Rain Garden will provide some flow attenuation from stormwater. They are providing a better water quality than what is there today - Upon questioning by Mr. Scully. Mr.__Seyerin stated that there was no water evaluation on the undeveloped portion of the site other than knowing from the grades in the standpoint that the water would continue to flow like it has done previously into the ditch. He only addressed what they currently were developing. The site slopes more from the east to the west. The area outside of the hotel generally flows to the west and Lake Washington Blvd. and it will continue to flow that way. In the Water Quality Manual there are several menus, there is one that determines if it is a high or low use site, which is generated by average daily use traffic. This site was determined to be low volume traffic therefore, they were required to do basic water quality treatment. They chose Rain Gardens because it is a very attractive technology that is available and is promoted by a lot of the jurisdictions. There are many ways to provide basic treatment, the Rain Garden treatment actually qualifies for enhanced treatment and it does a better job of cleaning the water. Mr. McCullough stated that they have addressed the legal arguments in the briefing submitted earlier and it remains their view that the burden that the appellants face in the SEPA appeal is a burden under the applicable case law of actually producing evidence. That has not been seen today, the only evidence that has been submitted is the Declaration of Dr. Massmarm and he testified here that he clearly made two fundamental assumptions to reach the conclusion that he did: 1. Four acres of the Iarger site would be converted from impervious to pervious surface and 2. He assumed the Rain Garden feature would be a stormwater element that would provide for the infiltration of stormwater. It has been clarified in their responselpresentation that both those assumptions are absolutely inaccurate. There will be no conversion of impervious to pervious as a result of the deconstruction and the Rain Garden is a water quality treatment feature. There is no likelihood of any increased infiltration of any material amount in this ground. There is no evidence in support of this SEPA appeal. Any change would be subject to review and there are no plans to change the impervious surfaces. The appellant has failed in their burden to show error and therefore asks the Examiner to uphold the SEPA Determination. Ann Nielsen stated that the applicant more than complied with all the necessary application materials and documents in his request for a SEPA review to the ERC. The ERC had all the necessary information before them that they needed to make an adequate SEPA assessment, in doing so they came to a DSN-M with specific mitigation measures. The Appellant has done nothing to show that there was any significant adverse environmental impact that was not contemplated or could not be mitigated by the conditions that were put upon by the ERC committee. The City would request that the Examiner find that the appellant has failed in their burden to show clear error and that the SEPA determination should be upheld. Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 7 Mr. Scully stated that the specific evidence they have pointed out is what happens if you do remove all the structures and impervious surfaces. They learned today on the record that they are not going to be doing that. That is not a condition of mitigation and not a part of their application. Contrary to what Mr. McCullough said the fact that it is in the record in front of the Examiner means nothing for the future. The fact that they said they were not going to do it, does not bind them from proceeding with separate projects. It does not prevent them from getting a separate permit, it also does not prevent them from doing things that do not require a permit. There is a glaring omission on what is going to happen on the majority of the site. At a minimum they ask that the Examiner require a mitigation condition that what is currently impervious outside the development area should remain impervious. Today there is not enough information as to what is going to happen to the rest of the site and an EIS should be required. The Examiner stated that if by imposing an additional condition the parties would agree to retract their appeal that is something that the Examiner is entitled to do_ By taking the appellant's concerns under advisement and the applicant's willingness at this point to say they are not going to do any of that action without permitting of the City. A 10 minute Break was taken LAND USE HEARING began at 10:49 am The following exhibits were entered into the record for the Hawk's Landing Land Use Hearing: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file, LUA-09-064, ECF, SA- M, SA -H containing the original application, various reports, correspondence file, SEPA documents, SEPA Appeal and Staff analysis. Exhibit No. 2: Neighborhood Detail Map Exhibit No. 3: Existing Conditions Exhibit No. 4: Hawk's LandiDg Master Site Plan Exhibit No. 5: Hawk's Landing Site Plan Exhibit No. 6: Site Dimension Plan Exhibit No. 7: Tree Inventory Plan Exhibit No. 8: Landscape Plan Exhibit No. 9: Site Utility Plan Exhibit No. 10: Grading Plan Exhibit No. 11: East and South Exterior Elevations Exhibit No. 12: West and North Exterior Elevations Exhibit No. 13: S & E Elevations a hic Exhibit No. 14: N & W Elevations (graphic) Exhibit No. 15: Hotel Garage Floor Plan Exhibit No. 16: First Floor Plan Exhibit No. 17: Second Floor Plan Exhibit No. 18: Third and Fourth Floor Plans Exhibit No. 19: Fifth Floor Plan Exhibit No. 20: Roof Plan Exhibit No. 21: Building Sections Exhibit No. 22: Demolition Plan Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 8 Exhibit No. 23: All Exhibits entered during the SEPA Appeal for the Hawk's Landing Hotel Exhibit No. 24: Reinart Statement of Qualifications Exhibit No. 25: Traffic Impact Analysis dated 5/2009 Exhibit No. 26: Pat Buntin ualifications Exhibit No. 27: Wetlands Report Exhibit No. 28: Mel Maertz Qualifications Exhibit No. 29: VMAC location Detail map showing hotel site to Exhibit No. 30: Map showing the area around the proposed site from WSDOT plans for 1-405 The hearing continued on "Tuesday, August 25, 2009, at 10:49 a -m_ in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. This portion is the hearing of the Hawk's Landing Mixed Use Master Site Plan Review and Site Plan Review. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The Examiner did ask for additional time in preparing his decision due to the length of the material presented. Vanessa Dolbee stated that she is. the project manager for the Hawk's Landing Hotel for the City of Renton. The applicant has requested a Master Site Plan and Site Plan Review. The City of Renton did receive some Capital Improvement Funds during the 2009 Legislative Session; Staff is currently working to identify how those will be expended, although it has to be approved by City Council, which has not approved the expenditures at this time. Some of the items on the table that do have a direct relationship to this project would be a water line extension on Lake Washington Blvd and the extension of a trail along May Creek and some storm drainage improvements along Lake Washington Blvd that may include some impervious sidewalk improvements. Review and permitting of this would happenn at a separate time. The site is located at 4350 Lake Washington Blvd N, the former site of Pan Abode Cedar Homes, to the northwest is VMAC; the home of The Seahawks, to the west are Barbee Mill and Quendall Terminal and to the south is May Creek. The parcel is 7.88 acres in size and the project area is 3.07 acres. There is a small triangular parcel of land at the far north end of the site which is currently owned by the City of Renton. A vacation request has been made by the applicant to acquire that parcel under file #VAC -09-001_ It has been approved with some conditions associated with the approval_ The hotel is proposed to be 60 -feet tall with 5 stories, 122,000 square feet with 173 rooms, with retail space, fitness center, spa, conference space, banquet facilities and a restaurant. Access to the site would be from Lake Washington Blvd via two locations; first is north located in the existing vacation area, which with approval would become a part of this parcel and would be limited to right-in/right-out only, the second access is to the center of the larger parcel and would provide access from both directions. There would be parking in an underground garage as well as surface parking, with 231 parking stalls total, 107 in the garage and 124 surface stalls_ This project is in compliance with the comprehensive plan, its elements, goals, objectives and policies. Lot coverage for the COR zone is 65%, the building footprint has a 22% coverage. Setbacks for the CDR zone are determined through the site plan review, the applicant has proposed a 20 -foot front setback from Lake Washington Blvd, a 60 -foot setback from the north side of the property line, a 480 -foot south setback and a 129 - foot setback from the rear property line along I405. The COR zone requires portions of the building which exceed 50 -feet in height would include upper story setbacks at a minimum of 10 -feet from the preceding story, the building should include vertical and horizontal modulation on roof lines and facades at a minimum of two feet and an interval minimum of 40 feet. The fifth Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.. LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 9 story of this hotel would be subject to these requirements_ The proposed architectural design meets the intent of the special development standard. The landscaping is determined through site plan review, perimeter landscaping has been proposed in widths from 6 -feet to 25 -feet, screening around the refuse and recycling areas, ornamental landscaping at the hotel entrance with a Koi pond and a pedestrian bridge crossing. Street trees would be planted along Lake Washington Blvd. This landscape plan further complies with the City's parking regulations. There are no specific standards for landscaping refuse and recycling for hotel developments. This proposal would improve the character of the site, new access would be provided and street frontage improvements provided. Landscaping would be provided that would screen the surface parking area from surrounding properties. The scale of the structure is larger than the Barbee Mill but smaller than the VMAC_ This hotel does provide a much needed transition from the existing residential and I-405_ The hotel would be more compatible with the surrounding residential than the former industrial site and the impacts to the surrounding properties and uses are expected to be minimal. The scale, height and bulk of the proposed buildings are appropriate for the site and would be compatible with surrounding properties. If and when the remainder of the site is developed, it would need to be compatible with the hotel. The proposal is expected to increase property values in the vicinity of the site. In addition to access and parking on the site, pedestrian connections to the public sidewalks are proposed along the street frontage which would provide safe pedestrian access throughout the site. The applicant would be required to provide a 12 -foot sidewalk along the frontage of Lake Washington Blvd with a 10 -foot landscaping strip for safety. The single building would not have an impact on the site's light and air circulation. There would be minimal noise impacts from the increased traffic, although the noise would be virtually unnoticeable because of the proximity of I-405. The Fire and Police Departments for the City of Renton have indicated that their existing facilities are adequate to accommodate the subject proposal. Impact fees have been required as a mitigation measure of the SEPA. Redevelopment of this site would help prevent deterioration and blight of the neighborhood. It would actually increase the quality of the subject site and the project is expected to contribute to the well-being of the City in general and the neighborhood in, particular. This site is located in Design District C, which is an overlay design district and it is in compliance with most of the requirements of the Design District, except for the following: The west elevation of the building has some blank walls and Staff has requested that the west side be re- designed at that portion to feature a pedestrian oriented fagade. Design District requires that all sides and top of refuse and recycling areas be enclosed_ Having a top enclosure would not function well with garbage collection, they have asked for a modification to not put a top on the enclosure_ The proposed surface parking lot is not intended to be built into a structured parking at future phases of potential development. This site is constrained by access off of one road and the internal circulation of the site is vital for future potential development and this parking lot would serve as that internal vehicular circulation. The applicant should submit new site plans indicating the entire pedestrian pathway throughout the parking lot as differentiating materials or texture from the adjacent paving. Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 10 The applicants have proposed to provide canopies along the fagade fronting Lake Washington Blvd that exceed the minimum width standards, although they do not meet the minimum length standards they have proposed them along 3 8.5% of the facade, which pertains to approximately 60 linear feet. The hotel design also provides modulation as it fronts Lake Washington Blvd, some portions of the hotel are setback and not immediately adjacent to the sidewalk. As such, the design requirement of the overhangs would not be achieving their goal in some of those areas, therefore the 60 -feet of linear canopy coverage. There are some additional requirements if the project is located in the COR zone, which this proposed project meets. Hearing was adjourned for lunch at 11:30 am... Back on record at 1:00 pm Pat Severin, 15214 Avon -Allen Road, Mt_ Vernon, WA 98273 stated that they had taken a look at the site with the existing conditions and constraints from elevations in the roadways and they came up with a grading plan that actually would grade the entire site towards the surface areas of the Rain Gardens from the entrance road and from all the parking areas towards the Rain Gardens. All this water would be collected in the Rain Gardens, treated, and conveyed to the discharge point down through the bottom of the ditch. Any of the water around the hotel would be picked up with downspouts and/or yard area drains directed to the same discharge location. He did not believe that any flow control would be required on this site per an exemption in the King County Manual. Some flow attenuation would happen with the Rain Garden. They do not have an approved construction document at this time, it is only a planning document. The next step would be to receive site plan approval and then proceed with the construction documents where they would finalize their design depending on comments from the City Staff. The Rain Gardens have not been approved as a design feature and in fact when the approval comes through it might not include Rain Gardens but some other feature_ There are a number of features that would provide the same level of treatment to choose from. The final plan would need to comply with the City's Code_ This 3.07 acre site is not within the 100 year flood plain, a portion of the south boundary just crosses the 100 year flood plain. Geralyn Rein att, PE, 159 Denny Way #111, Seattle, WA 98109 stated she is a self employed traffic engineering consultant specializing in the preparation of Traffic Impact Analyses. She was responsible for the preparation of the Traffic Impact Analysis for this project_ The analysis included a review of the existing conditions adjacent to the project including the operations of three intersections along NE 44'x, the northbound and southbound ramps to I-405, along with the Seahawks Way intersection. This included a review of the number of accidents along Lake Washington Blvd and NE 44`' Street. AM and PM peak hour traffic counts completed for the project were also used in the analysis, along with a review of the site accesses at two locations along Lake Washington Blvd. Looking at the site accesses, the existing Pan Abode driveway should be limited to right turns in and out due to its close location to the ramp interchange_ The main access to the site is located towards the southerly end of the hotel portion of the property. In looking at the future volumes at that intersection left turns into the site were recommended. Build out of the hotel could generate over 1400 daily trips, 97 during the AM peak hour and 102 during the PM peak hour per the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation Manual. The future trip Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 11 volume projections at the intersections mentioned earlier included pipeline trips from the adjacent Barbee Mill development that is ongoing currently plus a 2% annual growth rate in the traffic volumes, which is consistent with prior studies that have been completed in the area. The project trips were added into the future values to analyze the impacts from the project itself. The trip assignment for the hotel was based on prior work that was done in the vicinity and specifically the Port Quendali analysis of the I-405/NE 44'h Street interchange project access report prepared by WSDOT. There were some adjustments made to that report since this road was going to be serving Seahawks visitors, some of that traffic was redistributed up to the Seahawks facility. The critical movement at the intersection of Seahawks Way and Lake Washington Blvd near the northerly access to the site is currently moving at Level Service D during the peak hours. Future increases would drop that level of service to E with or without the hotel. The other critical intersection operations would be the north and southbound ramps to 1-405, some of the movements are operating at Level Service F during the AM peak hour and the delay on those movements would continue to increase over the next few years with or without the hotel project. All of these intersections are within the WSDOT limited access area, they are also subject to review as part of this project Measures to raise the level of service at these intersections was reviewed by both agencies and included the installation of traffic signals for the ramps and then some restriping of lanes and construction involved with lane additions. WSDOT did concur with these measures and requesting that the applicant participate in a proportionate share of the cost of these improvements, which are being proposed by WSDOT. Pat Bunting 3643 Leg Road, Bow, WA 48232 stated that her firm, Graham and Bunting, is an environmental and land use service. She was one of three on the project team that was assigned to go to the site and look for critical areas that could possibly be anywhere from the site down to May Creek. They found two small wetlands offsite by May Creek, they are Category 2 wetlands. There was May Creek, a Class 1 stream, there is also a ditch alongside Lake Washington Blvd which is a Class 5 stream. The hotel would be more than 200 feet from May Creek. The small wetlands were offsite and so are not buffered, they are well out of the range of the project site. Checking the habitat of the stream requires walking up and down the stream banks and looking for habitat including large debris, downed logs, vegetation, ripples and pools places where fish can spawn and feed, they looked at the classified ditch as well for that reason. May Creek is a habitat for fish. The wetlands were so small, their habitat value was found to be over winter when there would be water, and there might be some winter habitat. But there was not much there, the wetlands were not even wet at this time of year. Each one is less than 500 square feet. This project, as proposed, meets all requirements for the City of Renton. Mei Maertz, 16921 Larch Way, Lynnwood, WA 98037 gave a brief description of his qualifications. His role in this project was to help programming and master planning of the project. He worked on the design of the hotel. The site plan for the hotel is oriented to Lake Washington, taking advantage of the views, they planned this hotel so it would not affect the future development of the remainder of the site. They tried to accommodate the pedestrians and the traffic, it was important to look at the Seahawks facility and the connectivity between the two facilities. Parking to the back and easy access to the underground parking were very important. The hotel was designed with a Northwest Craftsman look and incorporated materials like those used in the Seahawks facility as well as the Barbee Mill community across the street. They are trying to create a sustainable building that would be a leader in the community. Vanessa Dolbee responded to an earlier question by the Examiner regarding refuse and recycling. Renton Municipal Code requires for multi -family developments one and a half square feet per dwelling unit and three square feet for recycling and three square feet per dwelling unit for refuse_ The office analysis was based on two square feet per 1000 gross building square feet for recycling and four square feet for refuse for 1000 gross Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.; LUA-09-060, ECF, SA-M, SA-H September I0, 2009 Page 12 building square feet, which results in for recycling the 244 square feet and refuse at 488 for the office requirement. Looking at the multi-family requirements the recycling (hotel rooms as dwelling units) 259.5 square feet for recycling and 519 square feet for refuse, which is actually an increase from the office calculations. Keith Scully, Attorney representing Brad Nicholson 1424 4" Ave, Ste. 1015, Seattle, WA 98103 stated that they had submitted some written comments as part of the Notice of Appeal. They learned a fair amount today and so would modify some of those comments. There are some greater concerns but also some reduced concerns with the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. A drainage plan is required under Renton Municipal Code as part of a Master Site Plan or Site Plan application. There is an exception to that requirement which allows the City to make a determination that if the proposal will not substantially alter the drainage pattern and/or it will not adversely affect the drainage pattern, then the City can waive that requirement. There has been no formal request for that and no formal waiver made and based on what they learned today that waiver is not applicable. This proposal does substantially alter the drainage pattern. They are going to grade the entirety of the site and route it into the Rain Garden. Currently water flows into the creek, this will adversely impact water quality because of flowing over what is undeveloped impervious surface, and it will be flowing over an active parking lot. The Drainage plan is a document that is reviewed by the Examiner and determines if what is proposed is compliant with Renton's code and with Renton's incorporation with the King County Surface Water Design Manual. What you have is a conceptual outline of what they might ask the City to approve as part of their building permit. This does not comply with the King County Surface Water Design Manual. There is nothing for the Examiner to rule on, they don't know if they are going to be doing the Rain Garden plan or something else. They are planning to deal with flow control and toxin removal through a Rain Garden treatment system, although they disagree with them, however they do admit that they need to do something to control the toxins that will come off the parking lot, A Rain Garden would be okay for this proposal, but what they have called a Rain Garden, includes an impermeable surface layer. A Rain Garden is something that has plants in it and lets water infiltrate the ground. There is an infiltration component to every single Rain Garden design, this impervious liner makes this not a Rain Garden. The water that is flowing off the parking lot now flows through a little bit of gravel into a pipe and straight to May Creek. What they are actually proposing is a thing called a perforated pipe collection system, which is a box with some gravel in it and a pipe at the bottom. There are no flow control credits for it, and that is because it does not work as a pollution control plan. He disagreed with the comments made by the wetlands specialist that you don't buffer something off site. If the properly line stops and there are no critters on your property, you are done with the evaluation. The habitat and the impacts on the habitat should be studied, not just the impacts on your property. There are fish in the creek, birdlife in the vegetation, and all the stuff that comes with a small conservancy designated wetland. The hotel is far from the wetlands, but the blank space in an unknown at this point. What do they intend to do with it? It appears that it is currently being used as overflow parking for the Seahawk's games, is it going to be lit with the lights shining on what may be song bird nesting habitat, what is the flow going to he like when cars are parking on it, are they going to be putting heavy equipment on it for some later project. No one knows what is going to happen. They have less of a concern on the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. If any part of this one project goes within 200 feet of May Creek, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit is needed. They have been told today that no part of this development will be within 200 feet of May Creek. If the south building is left untouched and no work done in that area, then they do not need a SSDP. They would ask for a special condition to be added that no work incur in that area within 200 feet of May Creek. Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.. LUA-09-060, ECF, SA-M, SA-H September 10, 2009 Page 13 Kayren Kittrick, Dev Engineering Supervisor, Community and Economic Development showed a map of the project site, she marked the site with an "X". Directly across to the northwest is the entrance of Seahawk Way and the VMAC building, it further showed the location of Barbee Mill development. This development has triggered improvements to the intersections including stop lights. The start of a LUA file is only preliminary discussions, included in those preliminary discussions is a preliminary drainage plan, it is required. The final construction plans takes in things brought in during the hearing, things added as conditions, best management practices plus changes they find on the site during construction. The Rain Garden design is very interesting, it seems closer to a bioswale design and that is one of the acceptable items. It will have to be studied to see if it works, if it does not, the applicant must find another method that is acceptable within the King County Surface Water Design Manual. The hotel and hotel parking could change anything that might affect the final calculations of what they have to treat and what has to be released. The standards are not relaxed, a preliminary design is presented, and that is what we know at this point based on specific calculations. Conditions can be made, ERC could have made a condition, plus once it gets looked into and they find it does not meet the King County Surface Water Design conditions or standards or doesn't do what they think it is going to do, the City runs their own calculations and checks on everything. Even under an EIS it is still a preliminary design.subject to change. Any soils that are removed from this site would be checked for contamination and treated as deemed necessary. Vanessa Dolbee stated that Mr_ Scully had been referring to a habitat management plan, the City code does not specify a habitat management plan, and they have a habitat assessment and a habitat data report. The habitat data report was waived (which is the same thing as the habitat assessment). It was waived because there was a Fish and Wildlife habitat section within the wetland and stream study that provided sufficient information to the City to determine that the habitat assessment report could be waived. Keith Scully stated that he believed that Renton's policy is to allow a preliminary drainage plan but that is wrong and now seems like the time to fix. it. RMC 4-60-030C says that persons applying for specific permits or approvals would submit for approval a drainage plan for their application or request. Further on, drainage plan is defined in the same section 4-60-030E stating that the drainage plan will be prepared in conformance with the department's construction plan drafting standards and contents and the design criteria contained in chapters 3, 4, and 5 of the current King County Surface Water Design Manual. Nothing in the code section about the start of a conversation or a preliminary plan, which means the final thing and they need to make a determination that it does or doesn't that the Hearing Examiner can then repeal. Jack McCullough stated that the only lingering issues have to do with the drainage plan. The testimony from Mr. Severin and the City stated that a drainage plan was submitted. The confusion here is that the comments from Mr. Scully on behalf of his client suggest that it is the Examiner's position in this proceeding to pass judgment on approved drainage plan. That is not the case. Sub-section G of the Code section referenced by Mr. Scully, Review and Approval of Plan, it indicates that the decision on the plan is reserved to the approval of the Development Services Division. In the second sentence of sub-section Gl, it says that if no action is taken by the City after submission of the Final Drainage Plans within 45 days, then such plan is deemed approved. In Sub-section G3 it indicates under additional information that the permit application shall be supplemented by any plans, specifications or other information considered pertinent in the judgment of the Administrator or his duly authorized representative. This is the process that Ms. Kittrick outlined, there is an additional submittal, it's not just a conversation, a report has been issued showing the process and treatment that is anticipated to take place. At this point it is incumbent on the Examiner in review of this information only to determine that the plan, in its current state, is feasible on the property. What has been heard from Ms. Kittrick and Mr. Severin is that there will be comments and they have not passed judgment on the acceptability under the manual or the City's Code. Mr. Severin testified that there are alternates that can easily be employed that qualify under the Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 14 manual. Once the process of comment is completed then you arrive at what G1 refers to as the Final Drainage Plan. Then the Administrator has 45 days to take final action. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 2:07 p.m. FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS &RECOMMENDATION ON SEPA APPEAL: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following FINDINGS: The appellants, South End Gives Back (aka SEGB) and Brad Nicholson, filed an appeal of a Determination of Non -Significance Mitigated (DNS -M) that the City issued for the proposed Hawk's Landing Hotel. The appellants filed the appeal in a timely manner. The applicant, Spencer Alpert, hereinafter applicant, applied for a Master Site Plan and a Site Plan review for a hotel complex that would include a 173 room hotel, retail space, a fitness center, spa and restaurant. The project would be developed on an approximately 3.07 acre portion of a larger 7.8 acre site located at 4350 Lake Washington Boulevard. The project also includes a proposed "rain garden' which is designed to handle stormwater collected on the subject site. 3_ The subject site is located between Lake Washington Boulevard on the west and 1-405 on the east and is almost directly south of the on-ramp for I-405 at NE 44th Street. 4. Lake Washington itself is located west of the subject site separated from the subject site by Lake Washington Boulevard, the Barbee Mill subdivision and the Quendall Terminals site. The new Seahawk's Training Center (Virginia Mason Athletic Center) is located a bit further north. May Creek and associated wetlands are located south of the subject site. 5. The subject site was the location of the Pan Abode Cedar Homes manufacturing site_ The site is developed with old, now vacant warehouses and almost the entire site is covered with pavement. There are approximately 75,214 square feet of warehouses and impervious surface covers approximately 85% of the subject site. 6. The applicant will be removing pavement and warehouses, "deconstructing" in terms used by the parties, from the north portion of the subject site, the approximately 3.07 acres that will be developed with the hotel and associated surface parking and landscaping. 7. May Creek and Lake Washington are both shorelines of the State and are both subject to the criteria of the Shoreline Master Program. The applicant has designed their demolition and redevelopment proposal to avoid any work within the 200 foot threshold of the Shoreline Master Program 8. The ERC imposed ten (10) conditions. Pour of those conditions related to geotechnical issues, wetland/stream issues, in compliance with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and erosion control under Department of Ecology regulations. Those four conditions are: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations found in the following geotechnical reports: "Geotechnical Engineering Study" prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. dated February 6, 1991; Hawk's banding Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.. LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -11 September 10, 2009 Page 15 "Geotechnical Investigation — Draft Report" prepared by Materials Testing & Consulting, Inc. dated June 4, 2009; and "Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Study — Proposed May Creek Office Building", prepared by Hart Crowser & Associates, Inc., dated October 8, 1985. 2. The applicant shall be required to comply with the recommendations included in the "Wetland/Stream Study", prepared by Graham -Bunting Associates, dated May 12, 2009, 3. This project shall be required to comply with the requirements found in the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual. 4. The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume If of the Stormwater Management Manual prior to issuance of Construction Permits. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division Plan Review Project Manager. " 9. The appellant calculates that if there is 85% impervious surface that subject site will generate storm water in the amounts of 10 to 20 acre feet of water or between 900 and 1800 gallons per day.Based on the applicant's submissions the appellant calculates that there will be approximately 38,866 square feet of landscaping. They also calculated the change in impervious surfaces. From those calculations the appellants deduce that "a reduction in impervious surface would dramatically increase the rate of groundwater recharge." (Appeal page 3) 10_ The appellants then explain that based on topography, measured groundwater at the site, and hydrogeologic conditions inferred from well logs and test pits, and known lake levels that groundwater will flow to the west, down and toward Lake Washington through the Quendall Terminals site. Since these groundwaters are inferred to flow toward the Quendall Terminals property the appellants anticipate that these groundwaters will pick up or increase the rate of contaminant discharge from Quendall to Lake Washington. The appellants allege contaminants entering the lake will have a deleterious impact on fish and people who use the lake. 11. Quendall Terminals is a Superfund site. That means it has been found to be significantly contaminated and is listed by the Federal Government due to the levels and nature of the contaminants found at the site. Past practices on the site released or produced dangerous hydrocarbons and toxic materials such as arsenic as part of the creosote and tar manufacturing and pole treatments produced on the site. 12. The appellants noted that "rain gardens are 'excavated or otherwise formed depressions in the landscape that provide storage, treatment, and infiltration of stormwater runoff. The soil in the depression is enhanced to promote infiltration and plant growth."' (Notice of Appeal, Page 2). Relying on the definitions found in the 2005 King County Manual, the manual referenced by the ERC to govern stormwater management on the subject site. 13. In summary the gist of the appellants' arguments are that the applicant will be using the rain garden and or other aspects of the proposal to infiltrate stormwater into the soils under the subject site. This will recharge or supplement the groundwater which will flow toward the west and the Quendall Terminals Superfund site. This will increase the contaminants leaching to Lake Washington from beneath the Quendall site. The toxics in turn will affect the health and safety of the lake for both humans and fish and animal populations. 14. The appellants base much of the appeal on the declaration of Joel Massmann in particular, the following paragraphs: Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 16 "7. A reduction in impervious surface would increase groundwater recharge at the project site. Based on typical rates of groundwater recharge in similar hydrogeologic environments, groundwater recharge may increase by approximately 1 to 2 acre-feet per year for each acre of impervious surface that is deconstructed. This is equivalent to an average runoff of 900 to 1,800 gallons per day for each acre of impervious surface that is deconstructed. 8. The estimated increase in groundwater recharge at the project site as a result of the proposed project is approximately 4 to 8 acre-feet per year (3,570 to 7,140 gallons per day). This estimate was developed assuming 4 acres of impervious surface could be deconstructed as part of the proposed development. 11. Increased groundwater recharge on the project site will likely increase the rate of contaminant discharge from the QuendaIl Terminals site of Lake Washington. This conclusion is based on the observed distribution of contamination beneath the Quendall Terminal site and on the inferred groundwater flow direction from the project site." (Declaration of Joel Massmann) 15. The applicant's submissions and testimony indicate that the feature called a "rain garden" will be installed. The applicant's "rain garden" is designed as a water collection system which captures and treats stormwater collected on the subject site and then conveys it to the same drainage ditch that has been conveying stormwater from the site in the past. Therefore, even if the above numbers are correct, the fact that the applicant proposes capturing most of the stormwater and conveying it to the existing ditch and then into May Creek, makes the numbers and probably the conclusions of the Massmann declaration inconsequential. If much of the stormwater is captured then it will not be entering or recharging the groundwater and will not exacerbate leaching of contaminants into the lake from the Quendall site. 16. There was some confusion or disagreement over whether the applicant's proposed rain garden installation would function to cleanse or treat pollutants. It may not meet the normal definitions for a "rain garden." If a review shows the proposed design is not suitable for its intended purpose than it should not be used. The applicant is still bound by the 2005 King County manual for detention, retention and treatment. The appellants also attempted to appeal the Master Site Plan as part of their original submission. There was no Master Site Plan decision issued when the appeal was filed. As a matter of fact, one of the land use decisions for which the SEPA appeal was filed was for a review of the Master Site Plan by the Hearing Examiner. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The decision of the governmental agency acting as the responsible official is entitled to substantial weight. Therefore, the determination of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the city's responsible official, is entitled to be maintained unless the appellant clearly demonstrates that the determination was in error. The appellant has failed to demonstrate error. 2. The Determination of Non -Significance in this case is entitled to substantial weight and will not be reversed or modified unless it can be found that the decision is "clearly erroneous." (Hayden v. Port Townsend, 93 Wn 2nd 870, 880; 1980). The court in citing Norway Hill Preservation and Protection Association v. King County Council, 87 Wn 2d 267, 274; 1976, stated: "A finding is'clearly erroneous' Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 17 when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." Therefore, the determination of the ERC will not be modified or reversed if it can meet the above test. For reasons enumerated below, the decision of the ERC is affirmed. 3_ The clearly erroneous test has generally been applied when an action results in a DNS since the test is less demanding on the appellant. The reason is that SEPA requires a thorough examination of the environmental consequences of an action. The courts have, therefore, made it easier to reverse a DNS. A second test, the "arbitrary and capricious" test is generally applied when a determination of significance (DS) is issued. In this second test an appellant would have to show that the decision clearly flies in the face of reason since a DS is more protective of the environment since it results in the preparation of a full disclosure document, an Environmental Impact Statement. 4. An action is determined to have a significant adverse impact on the quality of the environment if more than a moderate impact on the quality of the environment is a reasonable probability. (Norway, at 278). Since the Court spoke in Norway, WAC 197-11-794 has been adopted, it defines "significant" as follows: Significant. (1) "Significant" as used in SEPA means a reasonable likelihood of more than a moderate adverse impact on environmental quality. (2) Significance involves context and intensity ...Intensity depends on the magnitude and duration of an impact_... The severity of the impact should be weighed along with the likelihood of its occurrence. An impact may be significant if its chance of occurrence is not great, but the resulting environmental impact would be severe if it occurred. 5. Also redefined since the Norway decision was the term "probable." Probable. "Probable" means Iikely or reasonably likely to occur, ... Probable is used to distinguish likely impacts from those that merely have a possibility of occurring, but are remote or speculative. (WAC 197-11-782). The appellant did not provide a basis that could be used to reverse the City's determination. The proposal will undoubtedly create impacts to the community but they are not substantial, at least, not on the issues the appellants have raised. The appellants have failed to demonstrate that the ERC made a mistake. The applicant will be capturing storrawater water and conveying it in a manner similar to how it was previously conveyed from the subject site. Water will be directed to a rain garden and then be conveyed to the drainage ditch along the west side of the subject site. The water will be treated in the rain garden and while the phrase "rain garden" may not have its normal meaning, infiltration will not follow treatment. The stormwater will be collected, channeled and conveyed to the offsite drainage ditch. It will not be left to percolate into the underlying soils. It will not travel the downhill gradient toward and to Lake Washington. It will not exacerbate pollutants leaching from the contaminated soils into the lake. The post development groundwater quantities suggested by the appellants' evidence is unsupported by the facts. The ERC did not err in its review. The reviewing body has to determine if this proposal would have more than a moderate impact on the quality of the environment. This office is not left with any doubt about the reasonableness of the underlying decision.. The appellants have not provided evidence that the ERC erred. The decision Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 18 below is not clearly erroneous and the decision below should be affirmed. 8. The appealing party has a burden that was not met in the instant case_ The decision of the ERC must be affirmed. DECISION: The decision of the ERC is affirmed. MASTER SITE PLAN AND SITE PLAN REVIEW FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Spencer Alpert, filed a request for a Master Plan Review and Site Plan Review_ 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS -M). 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located 4350 Lake Washington Boulevard North. The subject site is the vacated Pan Abode factory site located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard. 1-405 is east of the site and its NE 44th Street access ramps are located north of the subject site. 6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial, office and residential uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 7. The subject site is currently zoned COR (Commercial, Office, Residential). In addition to being located in the COR Zone, the subject site is governed by the Urban Design District "C" overlay regulations_ The COR requirements also require all development to undergo both Master Plan and Site Plan review. The Master Plan review is an overview of a project to determine the overall project concept and how the project meets the City's goals. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1804 enacted in December 1959 - The applicant proposes developing approximately 3.07 acres of an approximately 7.8 acre site. The subject site is generally trapazoidal in shape. The south property line is approximately 732 feet (east to west). The western., Lake Washington Blvd frontage is approximately 800 feet long_ The eastern and northeast property lines together are approximately 900 feet long. At the north end of what appears to be part of the parcel is City of Renton property abutting the I-405 ramps. The applicant has requested a vacation of this property. Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 19 10. The south portion of the subject site contains regulated slopes, seismic hazards and flood hazards_ The applicant proposes an estimated 4,450 cubic yards of cut and approximately 15,000 cubic yards of fill for construction. 11. May Creek., a Class 1 shoreline of the state, and at least two associated wetlands are located south of the subject site. Any development within 200 feet of May Creek would be subject to the Shorelines Substantial Development Permit and Shorelines Management regulations. The applicant's proposed development will be outside of the 200 foot threshold and staff determined that it is not subject to those regulations. A drainage ditch along the City right-of-way runs along the west side of the property. The ditch is a non-regulated stream with associated non-regulated wetlands. (Wetland and Stream study for the project) - 12. The tree inventory showed 32 existing trees. The applicant proposes replacing those with 73 new trees and other landscaping (see below). 13. The applicant will be demolishing the existing warehouse structures that cover the 3.07 acres proposed for the hotel. The applicant will be retaining the other building on the remaining 4.73 acres. There wil l be no development or demolition within 200 feet of May Creek. 14. The applicant proposes developing a 5 -story hotel on the north portion or 3.07 acres of the site. The 173 room hotel building will be 60 feet tall and contain 122,000 square feet of interior space. It will have a footprint of approximately 29,336 square feet. The complex will also contain retail space, fitness center, spa, conference space, banquet facilities and a restaurant. There will be underground parking. 15. The hotel's footprint will be L-shaped. The long leg of the "L", oriented north to south, will face Lake Washington Boulevard. The short leg will be oriented east to west along the north end of the parcel. A plaza with water feature will be located in the crook of the "L". Parking will generally be located east of the building. 16. The applicant will be using a variety of materials for the exterior of the building. It will contain stone veneer, hardie shingles, lap siding and metal roofs. There will be "northwest" style overhangs and trusses. The appearance is intended to complement the development of the Barbee Mill plat west of Lake Washington Boulevard, The COR Zone and the Urban Design District require both vertical and horizontal modulation a minimum of 2 feet at an interval of 40 feet to add interest and quality to the project. Additionally, there is to be a building setback of 10 feet for buildings over 50 feet in height. The plans show that the building does meet the horizontal and vertical modulations and that the top story observes an approximately 12 -foot setback for most of that story and varies from zero feet to 39.5 feet. Staff has suggested that does meet the intent and with the variety of eaves, trusses, bump -outs, balconies and differentiated materials it more than meets the spirit of the "guidelines." 17. The entry from the east side or parking areas will be set off by the water feature that contains a Koi pond and pedestrian bridge. The Lake Washington entry will have a canopy. 18. Landscaping in the COR zone is developed as part of the Site Plan review process but is also governed by Iandscape requirements for surface parking lots. Along with the 73 new trees replacing the 32 that would be removed, the applicant proposes approximately 39,000 square feet of landscaping. New landscaping would be installed around the perimeter of the subject site, around the perimeter of the hotel building and in and around the parking lot. The landscaping will be confined to the 3.07 acres that the applicant proposes developing with the hotel. Street trees will be planted along Lake Washington Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 20 Boulevard and will be spaced 30 feet on center. A large variety of other landscape plants will be used throughout the site_ The applicant did not submit the necessary irrigation plan_ Parking lots with 100 or more stalls require 35 square feet of landscaping per stall, a minimum of 5 feet in width, 1 tree per 6 stalls, 5 shrubs per100 square feet and landscaping within 50 feet of parking stalls. Staff calculated that the submitted pians meet the minimum requirements. 19. Staff has calculated the required parking based on use as a minimum of 223 and a maximum of 235 stalls and the applicant proposes 231 stalls, meeting code. There would be 107 stalls in the parking garage, and 124 surface stalls including 6 ADA stalls and stalls for five Neighborhood Electric Vehicles. Staff noted that for parking lots of this size 7 ADA stalls are required. Staff noted that both parking areas meet code for dimensions and compact stalls. 20. Lot coverage permitted in the COR zone for a building with surface parking is 65 percent. The proposed 29,336 square foot building covers approximately 22 percent of the 3.08 acres proposed for the hotel complex. The setback from the freeway is a required 10 feet whereas other setbacks are determined during site plan review. The applicant proposes a 20 foot setback from Lake Washington Boulevard, its apparent front yard, 60 feet from the north property Iine, 129 feet from its eastern, freeway property line and 418 feet from the south property line (including the acreage outside of the 3.07 acres). The zone permits buildings of 125 feet or 10 stories whereas 60 feet and five stories are proposed. 21. The applicant will provide access to the subject site via two locations. One driveway will be located along the north boundary of the subject site. The second, main driveway will be a more formal, two- lane gateway driveway at Lake Washington Boulevard located south of the hotel building. 22. Garbage and recycling areas are determined by use but hotels are not specifically identified. Staff evaluated the use as an office use that would require approximately 732 square feet of space and considered the fact that the applicant will be using a trash compactor in determining that the proposed 379.52 feet was adequate. The applicant has requested that this refuge complex not contain the roof required by the minimum standards since it requires dumpsters be moved out for collection since the dumpsters cannot be raised to truck level with a roof enclosure. 23. The development will increase traffic approximately 1,400 trips. There will be approximately 97 a.m. trips and 102 p.m. trips. The City's estimate of 1,413 trips matches the numbers predicted by the applicant. 24. As part of the development of the subject site the applicant proposes raising the grade of the site to match Lake Washington Boulevard. This will expose the hotel to the general public and allow the public to enter the site from surrounding sidewalks and trails. 25. Staff in its matrix chart has identified compliance, partial compliance or failure to meet the District C Design Guidelines minimum standards as well as suggested guidelines. That matrix is adopted by this office and incorporated into this report by reference. Particular reference is made to lighting for safety and not spilling off the site, facade treatment along the Lake Washington frontage lacking character elements to break up blank or rather unadorned Iengths of facade, pedestrian paths in the parking areas and sufficient to provide both a trail link and pedestrian link around the site and connecting to the May Creek and King County paths and trails. 26. No Planned Action Ordinance was adopted for this site_ Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 21 27. Stormwater will be collected and conveyed to what the applicant terms a rain garden for treatment and then conveyed to an offsite ditch that runs along the west side of the site. The ditch conveys water to May Creek and then Lake Washington_ As discussed in the SEPA Appeal decision issued with this project, the proposal will not be using infiltration and the stormwater will not be exacerbating any issues with pollutants from the Quendall Terminals site discharging into Lake Washington. The applicant will be governed by City, State and Federal regulations regarding discharges from the subject site. 28. Sewer and water are provided to the subject site by the City. CONCLUSIONS: 1_ The project is subject to both Master Plan and Site Plan review as well as review under the District C Design Guidelines and the COR special considerations. The fact that only one building is involved in this proposal makes consideration of Master Planning for the subject site mirror the Site Plan review standards. While the building will contain a mix of uses including a restaurant was well as the much larger motel, these various uses are included in the one facade scheme. It would make more sense to invoke the Master Plan review when the remainder of the 7.8 acre site is developed to make sure it is well coordinated with this current hotel complex. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; C. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air, h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 3. The Comprehensive Plan's designation for this area is for the development of larger scale commercial, office and residential uses befitting what are some of the larger parcels in the City. Many COR parcels were used for industrial production that dedicated larger swaths of lands for those purposes. As some of those industrial uses have moved away, the land is available for larger projects. The proposed hotel, especially in conjunction with the Seahawk's training complex is such a large scale project_ The hotel is a kind of mixed use - temporary residences for patrons while a commercial operation_ The hotel will also integrate a restaurant and retail uses into the mix_ The proposal is compatible with the goal of transforming old industrial sites into high quality development. 4. The proposal in the main is compatible with the Zoning Code. It meets the height and setback Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.; LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 22 requirements of the code_ It provides the complement of parking required. It meets the design details for modulation and articulation found in the Code and in the District C Design Guidelines. The top floor does not completely abide by the suggested setbacks from lower floors but on average exceeds those setbacks and greatly exceeds those setbacks on many of the top floor's facades. Staff found it was an appropriate design. Similarly, staff found that the proposal meets the code requirements for garbage and recycling and in comparison to the overall size and bulk of the facility and it appears staff is correct. This office does have some problems with the fact that the roof required appears to conflict with actual pickup services by garbage/recycle handlers. Staff and the City need to review these issues. Compliance with actual Building and Fire Code provisions will be verified when appropriate detailed permits are submitted. The building will be taller than the former warehouse uses on the subject site but it certainly is more graciously designed. It will be taller than the residential uses west of Lake Washington Boulevard but shorter than the nearby training center. It will provide a buffer from I-405 and a transition from the freeway interchange to the residential uses located along Lake Washington Boulevard. The State has asked for mitigation and that is incorporated into the ERC's conditions. Turn lanes should mitigate impacts of traffic along Lake Washington Boulevard. The nature of the trips will also be different from the former industrial use of the site. An appeal was filed of the ERC's decision. That appeal was directed at minimizing the potential impacts of converting a large area of impermeable surface to a new hotel facility. There was a misunderstanding of how stormwater would be handled. The appeal was denied but issues raised in that appeal can be further clarified in the Site flan review. The site will still be conveying its storm waters to May Creek and Lake Washington. Those waters should be handled with respect and appropriately treated by whatever water retention, detention or "rain garden" feature is used. The applicant should use best available science in treating stormwater before conveying it to the roadside ditch. There is no reason to jeopardize May Creek and/or Lake Washington with pollutants created or collected on this site's paved or treated landscaping areas. 6_ The proposal will replace old warehouses with a modern hotel with substantial exterior appeal. The building will use a variety of materials to break up the apparent bulk of the building and will acid appreciably to the landscaping on the site as well as along Lake Washington Boulevard. The longest facade treatment along Lake Washington Boulevard has a number of horizontal and vertical breaks providing an interesting appearance. Coupled with the variety of materials, wood, hardie board, veneer treatments as well as roof trusses all add to the visual variety the building presents to the public. Staff has noted that additional opening in what are considered blank walls will be needed along this facade to comply with code and provide the visual interest of the building. There will be perimeter landscaping added around the hotel and around the general site. The applicant will be providing street trees along Lake Washington Boulevard for the extent of the development proposal_ The applicant should provide landscaping along the remainder of Lake Washington Boulevard and along the eastern and southern perimeter of the parking areas. The Master Plan process does include "master planning" for the entire subject site. While the applicant is trying to confine its footprint, the spare nature of the remaining site will detract from what appears to be a quality image. Therefore, the remaining acreage should be incorporated at least minimally. The Master Plan cannot escape that there is a much larger site that suffers from old, deteriorating buildings that will reflect on the current proposal_ This office believes that the applicant and staff can work on a plan that accommodates additional landscaping, even temporary landscaping in planter boxes with some larger trees to screen or breakup the view of the background unsightly portions of the site east and west of the parking areas. Additionally, the applicant should plant additional street trees along the remaining Lake Washington Boulevard frontage at the same ratio and species as on the north frontage. Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 23 7. The redevelopment of this now underutilized site will help increase the tax base of the City and the removal of old warehouses should conserve if not increase property values. Obviously, there will be more general hubbub and traffic than a vacant warehousing site produces_ These were anticipated when the Comprehensive Plan and zoning were enacted for this site and this area. Redevelopment of this site is a vital element of the City's objectives for this area_ 8. The internal circulation and the pedestrian paths seem generally appropriate_ Distinctive marking to provide visual separation of pedestrian routes from vehicular crossings may need better definition. As indicated by staff, this site connects trails in the vicinity and the applicant should make appropriate provisions for trail users as well as general pedestrian traffic. Staffs recommendations on path width are appropriate. 9. While the building and bulk are larger than what is on the site, clearly the proposed 60 foot height is substantially less than permitted in'the zone. In addition, the generous setbacks provided as well as the width of 1405 and Lake Washington Boulevard will aid in letting air and light penetrate the subject site as well as surrounding properties. 10. As noted, there will be more comings and goings from this site than the community is used to but development has occurred to its west and that has already introduced more urban tumult. There will be the usual but temporary construction noise and I405 already adds to the ambient noise levels in this area. it. There are available urban services including sewer and water. The applicant will be paying a Fire Mitigation fee. 12. The redevelopment of the site will counter the neighborhood deterioration and blight that the current site represents. The project looks very well-designed and should be an asset to the community and City as a whole. 13. The project is also required to comply with the COR Zone special review criteria as well as the District C Design Guidelines. As discussed above, this office has adopted staff's analysis and recommendations regarding compliance with those numerous criteria. Some of the thematic requirements overlap the broad review of the Site Plan criteria. Specific requirements were covered by the Staff review and are incorporated into this report. They are attached to the end of this report. 14. The special criteria for the COR zone include: a. The plan is consistent with a Planned Action Ordinance, if applicable. b. The plan creates a compact, urban development that includes a compatible mix of uses that meets the Comprehensive Plan vision and policy statements for the Commercial -Office - Residential Comprehensive Plan designation. C. The plan incorporates public and private open spaces to provide adequate areas for passive and active recreation by the occupants/users of the site, and/or to protect existing natural systems. d. The plan provides view corridors to the shoreline area and Mt_ Rainier where applicable. C. Public access is provided to water and/or shoreline areas; Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 24 f. The plan provides distinctive focal points such as public area plazas, prominent architectural features, or other items_ g. Public and/or private streets are arranged in a layout that provides reasonable access to property and supports the land use envisioned. h. The plan accommodates and promotes transit, pedestrian, and other alternative modes of transportation. 15. No Planned action ordinance is involved in this review. The property does not lie along Lake Washington. The height of the building should provide views of the lake and view corridors might exist between the homes on the west side of the boulevard. The project will accommodate the trail as well as retail shops and a restaurant open to the public. The Koi pond, bridge and paths as well as the prominent entry and facade features provide a focal point. Transportation fees as well as accommodations to the State and turning lanes will provide reasonable access to the subject site. At the moment, public transit does not travel this route. The applicant has expressed a willingness to accommodate such access. 16. In conclusion, the proposed use complements activity that has been occurring in this area. It is hoped that the development of the north portion of this site will spur redevelopment of the southern portion. DECISION: The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. A detailed landscape plan and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a landscape architect registered in the State of Washington, a certified nurseryman, or other similarly qualified professional, and be submitted by the applicant and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to issuance of the building permit. 2. The applicant shall provide a revised site plan that depicts 7 ADA parking spaces. The revised site plan shall be submitted by the applicant and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to issuance of construction permit. 3. The applicant shall submit an access driveway grade cross section indicating compliance with RMC 4- 4-080.1.6.b to be submitted by the applicant and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to issuance of construction permit. 4. The street vacation, file # VAC -09-001, shall be completed prior to Certificate of Final Occupancy. 5_ The applicant shall redesign the west elevation to feature a pedestrian -oriented fagade. The new elevation drawings shall be submitted to the Department of Community and Economic Development project manager for review and approval prior to building permit approval. 6. The applicant shall submit a new site plan that indicates the entire pedestrian pathways through the parking lot as a different material or texture from the adjacent paving prior to building permit approval. This site plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Community and Economic Development project manager. 7. The applicant shall provide an updated site plan to the City of Renton Current Planning Project Manager indicating 12 -foot sidewalk widths and a I 0 -foot wide landscape strip along the frontage of the 3.07 acres of the development site, prior to construction permit approval. S. The applicant shall be required to provide a lighting plan that adequately provides for public safety without casting excessive glare on adjacent properties to the Current Planning Project Manager for Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 25 review and approval at the time of building permit review. 9_ The applicant shall use best available science in treating stormwater before conveying it to the roadside ditch. The stormwater shall be treated by whatever means including water retention, detention or "rain garden" feature in order to reduce pollution entering the ditch and then May Creek. The development shall not jeopardize May Creek and/or Lake Washington with pollutants created or collected on this site's paved or treated landscaping areas. 10. The applicant and staff shall work on a plan that accommodates additional landscaping, even temporary landscaping in planter boxes with some larger trees to screen or breakup the view of the background unsightly portions of the site east and west of the parking areas_ Additionally, the applicant should plant additional street trees along the remaining Lake Washington Boulevard frontage at the same ratio and species as is planted along the north frontage. ORDERED THIS 10'' day of September 2009. q�--JL , FRED J. KA MAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 10'h day of September 2009 to the parties of record: Spencer Alpert Alpert International, LLP 10218 Richwood Ave NW Seattle, WA 98177 Greg Fawcett PO Box 402 Fall City, WA 98024 Keith Scully Gendler & Mann 1424 Fourth Ave, Ste_ 1015 Seattle, WA 98103 Jack McCullough McCullough Hill, PS 70I Fifth Ave, Ste. 7220 Seattle, WA 98104 Pat Severin Sound Development Group 15214 Avon -Allen Rd. Mt. Vernon, WA 98273 Steve Van Til Port Quendall Company 505 Union Station 505 Fifth Ave S, Ste. 900 Seattle, WA 98104 Larry Reymann 1313 N 38`° Street Renton, WA 98056 Mr_ Brad Nicholson Attn: Keith Scully 1424 Fourth Ave_, Ste. 1015 Seattle, WA 98103 Jessie Clawson McCullough Hill, PS 701 Fifth Ave, Ste. 7220 Seattle, WA 98104 Geraldine Reinart, PE 159 Denny Way #111 Seattle, WA 98109 Rich Wagner Baylis Architects 10801 Main Street Bellevue, WA 98004 Frank and Carrie Lord 4041 232aa Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 Dr. Joel Massmann 6520 E Mercer Way Mercer Island, WA 98040 Dan Mitzel 1 I 1 Cleveland Avenue Mt. Vernon, WA 98273 Pat Bunting 3643 Leg Road Bow, WA 98232 Mel Maertz Ann Nielsen Vanessa Dolbee 16921 Larch Way Assistant City Attorney Associate Planner Lynnwood, WA City of Renton City of Renton Hawk's Landing Mixed Use and SEPA Appeal File No.: LUA-09-050, ECF, SA -M, SA -H September 10, 2009 Page 26 Kayren Kittrick Community and Economic Development TRANSMITTED THIS I0"' day of September 2009 to the following: Mayor Denis Law Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Julia Medzegian, Council liaison Marty Wine, Assistant CAO Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Jennifer Henning, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services Dave Pargas, Fire Larry Meckling, Building Official Planning Commission Transpiration Division Utilities Division Neil Watts, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services Renton Reporter Pursuant to Title N, Chapter 8, Section 100Gofthe City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., September 24, 2009. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 .m. September 24 2009. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be reguired prior to approval by Ci Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. kA h r-1 U O- z ANY V) W� �J air, qt. i I— V F— H Do F �+ ox X W -- � 506 hYMFf91H 31 V15M31NI -f. -,,,I w �g Y f1 p qq � \�' . 3pa � _i Yi i !j \pI }� Ro E x ¢g.jaf.- -I Eai-�� �i _ w 2 i C z 0 I I I I 5O .. �\ a oz -- � 506 hYMFf91H 31 V15M31NI -f. -,,,I w �g Y f1 p qq � \�' . 3pa � _i Yi i !j \pI }� Ro E x ¢g.jaf.- -I Eai-�� �i - Z �\ a z� ` � c ,W s Li H x W 5,4103, 1 its Rik.; e3e aEVys as IG q } J kip f KIN 0 J = W R ■Ye mei H fb X W agoa! IMMIN ERE WOM 41 mll I 110101 A XMI EA 11184 IM7 f •� 6 LIM dal} ii 0 1911111 4 ai}3A� if �4ts$ i s.l Ui i ¢1 iitltlk #'� 5 �i� 1�3�'�•��i�:3i�'il$���i � E ��� •t$'Rtl,�'$�E�F11 ' � F W t L � 4 r �7 1 � Ln LlME # zjLWQ elf _ c O •-.Y at.r. - •` ..Y 4�: ~ - y .ice. _ -.or, -- ----- i •:� ! - dvo2lirvb Q�7Jlfj�rf$ , — i j. a=oma �m>M 3m� a. Review of Compliance to District C Design Guidelines; The subject property is located within Design District 'C. The proposed project must meet the intent of the Design Regulations where the regulations are applicable. As demonstrated in the table below the proposal meets the intent of the Design Regulations on the basis of individual merit gall conditions of approval are met. Two categories have been established_ (a) "minimum standards" that must be met, and (b) `guidelines" that, while not mandatory, are considered in determining if the proposed action meets the intent of the design guidelines. The fohowing are the categories for compliance: M= Met NM- Not Met I PM= Partially Met I NA= Not Applicable A. SUE DESIGN AND BUILDING LOCATION: Intent: To ensure that buildings are located in relation to streets and other buildings so that the Vision of the City of Renton can be realized for a high-density urban environment; so that businesses enjoy visibility from public rights-of-way; and to encourage pedestrian activity throe hoot the district. 1. Site Design and Street Pattern: Intent: To ensure that the City of Renton Vision can be realized within the Urban Center Districts; plan districts that are organized for efficiency while maintaining flexibility for future development at high urban densities and intensities of use; create and maintain a safe, convenient network of streets of varying dimensions for vehicle circulation; and provide service to businesses. Minimum Standard; Provide a network of public and/or private local streets in addition to public arterials. Minimum Standard: Maintain a hierarchy of streets to provide organized circulation that promotes use by multiple transportation modes and to avoid overburdening the roadway system. The hierarchy shall consist of (from greatest in size to smallest): (a) High Visibility Street. A highly visible arterial street that warrants specia I design treatment to improve its appearance and maintain its transportation function. (b) Arterial Street. A street classified as a principal arterial on the City's Arterial Street Plan_ (c) Pedestrian -Oriented Streets. Streets that are intended to feature a concentration of pedestrian activity. Such streets feature slow moving traffic, narrow travel lanes, on -street parking, and wide sidewalks, (d] Internal or local roads (public or private). Z. Building Location and Orientation: Intent: To ensure visibility of businesses; establish active, lively uses along sidewalks and pedestrian pathways; organize buildings in such a way that pedestrian use of the district is facilitated; encourage siting of structures so that natural light and solar access are available to other structures and open space; enhance the visual character and definition of streets within the district; provide an appropriate transition between buildings, parking areas, and other land uses and the street; and increase privacy for residential uses located near the street. Minimum Standard: Buildings on designated pedestrian -oriented streets shall feature "pedestrian -oriented facades" ? and clear connections to the sidewalk isee illustration, RMC 43-1 E7a). Such buildings shall be located adjacent to the sidewalk, except where pedestrian -oriented space is located between the building and the sidewalk. Parking between the building and pedestrian -oriented streets is prohibited Minimum Standard: Buildings fronting on pedestrian -oriented streets shall contain pedestrian -oriented uses. Minimum Standard: Nonresidential buildings may be located directly adjacent to any street as long as they feature a pedestrian -oriented fayade .Staff Comment The majority of the fapde facing Lake Washington Boulevard would be incomplionce with this minimum standard with the exception of south half of this facade on the ground floor. Approximately 62 feet of the southern side of the fagade is not designed to meet this standard. This 62 feet is designed with stone veneer and vertical siding. As such, staff recommends o condition of approval that the applicant redesign the west elevation to feature a pedestrian - oriented faf'ade. The new elevation drowings shallbe submitted to the Deportment of Community and Economic DevelopmentDevelopmentfor review and approval by the pirgiect manager prior to building permit approval, Minimum Standard: Buildings containing street -levet residential uses and single -purpose residential buildings shall be set back from the sidewalk a minimum of 10 feet and feature substantial landscaping between the sidewalk and the building (see illustration, RMC 43-100E7b) Minimum Standard; N buildings do not feature pedestrian -oriented facades they shall have substantial landscaping between the sidewalk and building. such landscaping shall be at least 10 feet in width as measured from the sidewalk (See illustration, RMC 43-1WE7c). Guideline: Siting of a structure should take into consideration the continued availability of natural light (both direct and - reflected) and direct sun exposure to nearby buildings and open space (except parking areas). Guideline: Ground floor residential uses located near the street should he raised above street level for residents' privacy. 3. Building Entries: Intent: To make building entrances convenient to locate and easy to access, and ensure that building entries further the pedestrian nature of the fronting sidewalk and the urban character of the district. Minimum Standard: Multiple buildings on the same site should provide a continuous network of pedestrian paths and o n spaces that incorporate landsca ping to provide a directed view to building entries. Minimum Standard: Ground floor units should be directly accessible from the street or an open space such as a' courtyard or garden that is accessible from the street. Minimum Standard: Secondary access (not fronting on a street) should have weather protection at least 4-1f2 feet wide: ..:: over the entrance or other similar indicator of access. Minimum Standard: Pedestrian access should be provided to the building from property edges, adjacent lots, abutting street intersections, crosswalks, and transit stops. Minimum Standard: Features such as entries, lobbies, and display windows should be oriented to a street or pedestrian- oriented space; otherwise, screening or decorative features such as trellises, artwork, murals, landscaping, or combinations thereof should be incorporated into the street-oriented facade. 777 Guideline: For projects that include residential uses, entries should provide transition space between the public street ,a. and the private residence such as a porch, landscaped area, terrace, common area, lobby, or similar feature. 4. Transition to Surrounding Development: Intent: To shape redevelopment projects so that the character and value of Renton's long-established, existing neighborhoods are preserved. S. Service Element location and Design: intent: To reduce the potential negative impacts of service elements (i.e., waste receptacles, loading docks) by locating service and loading areas away from high-volume pedestrian areas, and screening them from view in high visibility areas. Minimum Standard: Service elements shall be located and designed to minimize the impacts on the pedestrian 771; r' environment and adjacent uses. Service elements shall be concentrated and located where they are accessible to service 3-1 E7 vehicles and convenient for tenant use (see illustration, RMC 4-e). Minimum Standard: Garbage, recycling collection, and utility areas shall be enclosed, consistent with RMC 4-4-OW x, Refuse and Recyclables Standards, and RMC 4-095. Screening and Storage Hei t/Location Limitations. Minimum Standard: In addition to standard enclosure requirements, garbage, recycling collection, and utility areas shall be enclosed on all sides, including the roof and screened around their perimeter by a wall or fence and have self-closing doors (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100E70. staff Commen_ t_ The proposed enclosure for the garbage and recycling collection area includes screening on all sides with the exception of o roof. The applicant has indicated that if a roof was provided then the dumpsters would have to be pushed or maneuvered out of the enclosurefor collection because the collection trucks need to lift the dumpster to empty it into the truck. In order for the dumpsters to be directly lifted from the enclosure the exemption of the roof would be required. As such, staff recommends approval of this modification. Minimum Standard: The use of chain link, plastic, or wire fencing is prohibited. Minimum Standard: If the service area is adjacent to a street, pathway, or pedestrian-oriented space, a landscapedLA li, planting strip, minimum 3 feet wide, shall be located on 3 sides of such facility. Guideline: Service enclosure fences should be made of masonry, ornamental metal or wood, or some combination of the three. 6. Gateways: Intent. To distinguish gateways as primary entrances to districts or to the City; provide special design features and architectural elements at gateways; and ensure that gateways, while they are distinctive within the context of the district, are compatible with the district in form and scale. Minimum Standard: Developments located at district gateways shall be marked with visually prominent features (see?:4_. illustration, subsection RMC 4-3-100.E7 ). Minimum Standard: Gateway elements shall be oriented toward and scaled for both pedestrians and vehicles {see 'T c x `'. illustration, subsection RMC4-3-10017h). Minimum Standard: Visual prominence shall be distinguished by two or more of the following:` a. Public art; b. Monuments; c- Special landscape treatment; d. Open space/plaza; e. Identifying building form; f. Special paving, unique pedestrian scale fighting, or bollards; o Prrvninnnt arrhitpcturaI features (trellis. arbor. oerRola, or gazebo); or district entry identifiration (commercial signs are not allowed). 0. PARKING AND VEHICULAR ACCf55: Intent: To provide safe, convenient access to the Urban Center and the Center Village; incorporate various modes of transportation, including public mass transit, in order to reduce traffic volumes and other impacts from vehicles; ensure sufficient parking is provided, while encouraging creativity in reducing the impacts of parking areas; allow an active pedestrian environment by maintaining contiguous street frontages, without parking lot siting along sidewalks and building facades; minimize the visual impact of parking lots; and use access streets and parking to maintain an urban edge to the district. L Location of Parkin: Intent: To maintain active pedestrian environments along streets by placing parking lots primarily in back of buildings. Mlnimum Standard: On Designated Pedestrian -Oriented Streets: PM, _ (a) Parking shalt be at the side and/or rear of a building, with the exception of on -street parallel parking. iso more than 60 feet of the street frontage measured parallel to the curb shall be occupied by off-street parking and vehicular access_ rM (bj On -street parallel parking spaces located adjacent to the site can be included in calculation of required parking. For parking ratios based on use and zone, see RMC 4-4-480. Parking, Loading and Driveway Regulations. (c) On -street parallel parking shall be required on both sides of the street. where possible, rather than internal drive aisles. e_ Minimum Standard: All parking lots located between a building and street or visible from a street shall feature landscaping between the sidewalk and buildin • see RMC 4-"80F, Parking Lot Design Standards. „.. Minimum Standard. The applicant must successfully demonstrate that the surface parking lot is designed to facilitate future structured parking and/or other infill development. For example, an appropriate surface parking area would - feature a one thousand five hundred foot {1,500') maximum perimeter area and a minimum dimension on one side of two hundred feet (200'), unless project proponent can demonstrate future aitemative use of the area would be physically possible. Exception: If there are size constraints inherent in the original parcel (see illustration, subsection FSa of this Section). $tuff Comment: The proposed surface parking lot does not meet the minimum requirement of 1,500 feet of perimeter area. In oddition, preliminary design and discussion with the applicant indicated that this proposed surface parking lot would remain with full build out of the subject site. Lake Washington Soulevard is the only access to the subject site, which results in the requirement to provide internal vehicular circulation for the subject parcel. in order for there to be suffxfent intemol circulation at a future dote, this surface parking lot would be required. As such, staff recommends approval of the surface panting lot as proposed- roposedGuideline: Guideline.,In areas of mixed use development, shared parking is recommended. Guideline: If a limited number of parking spaces are made available in front of a building for passenger drop-*ff and pick-up, they shall be parallel to the building facade. 30 Guideline: when fronting on streets not designated as pedestrian -oriented, parking lots should be located on the interior portions of blocks and screened from the surrounding roadways by buildings, landscaping and/or gateway features as dictated by location. z. uesign of surrace Parting: Intent To ensure safety of users of parking areas, convenience to businesses, and reduce the impact of parking lots wherever possible. Minimum Standard: Parking lot lighting shall not split onto adjacent or abutting properties (see illustration, subsection PM, _ RMC 4-3-100.F5b). Sro Comm n : See sect"on G Li htin " below. Minimum Standard: All surface parking lots shall be landscaped to reduce their visual impact (see RMC 4-4-0 F7, rM Landscape Requirements). Guideline: Wherever possible, parking should be configured into small units, connected by landscaped areas to provide on-site buffering from visual im acm Guideline: Access to parking modules should be provided by public or private local streets with sidewalks on both sides where possible, rather than internal drive aisles. e_ Guideline: Where multiple driveways cannot be avoided, provide landscaping to separate and minimize their impact on the stn:etscape. „.. 3. Structured Parking Garages: Intent: To more efficiently use land needed for vehicle parking; encourage the use of structured parking throughout the Urban Center and the Center Village; physically and visually integrate parking garages with other uses; and reduce the overall impact of parking garages when they are located in proximity to the desienated pedestrian environment. (J Minimum Standard: Parking Structures Fronting De0imated Pedestrian -Oriented Streets: rking structures shall provide space for ground floor commercial uses along street frontages at a minimum of .T: wk: _ of the frontage width (see illustration, subsection RMC 4-3-100.F5c). ML he entire facade must feature a pedestrian -oriented facade. Standard: Parkin Structures FrontingNon-Pedestrian-Oriented Streets: rking structures fronting non -pedestrian -oriented streets and not featuring a pedestrian -oriented facade shall �n t baric at least 6 feet from the sidewalk and feature substantial landscaping. This includes a combination of reen and deciduous trees, shrubs, and ground cover. This setback shall be increased to 10 feet adjacent to rin visibility streets - that thecaped he Director may allow a reducedsetbackwhere the applicant can successfully demonstrate area and/or other design treatment meets the intent of these standards and guidelines- Possible ments to reduce the setback include landscaping components plus one or more of the following integrated the architectural design of the building: (1) Ornamental grillwork (other than vertical bars); (2) Decorative artwork; (3) Display windows; (4) Brick, tile, or stone; (5) Pre -cast decorative panels; (6) Vine -covered trellis; (7) Raised landscaping beds with decorative materials; or (S) Other treatments that meet the intent of this standard" (c) Facades shall be articulated architecturally, so as to maintain a human scale and to avoid a solid wall. Vehicular _ entrances to nonresidential or mixed use parking structures shall be articulated by arches, lintels, masonry trim, or other architectural elements and/or materials (see illustration, subsection RMC 4-3-100.FSd). Guideline: Parking garage entries should be designed and sited to complement, not subordinate, the pedestrian entry, if possible, locate the parking entry away from the primary street, to either the side or rear of the building. Guideline: Parking garage entries should not dominate the streetsrape. "" KIM Guideline: The design of structured parking at finished grade under a building should minimize the apparent width of 22 imt P39 garage entries. Guideline: Parking within the building should be enclosed or screened through any combination of walls, decorative grilles, or trellis work with landscaping. Guideline: Parking garages should be designed to be complementary with adjacent buildings. Use similar forms, materials, and/or details to enhance garages. Guideline: Parking service and storage functions should be located away from the street edge and generally not be visible from the street or sidewalks. 4. Vehicular Access: Intent: To maintain a contiguous, uninterrupted sidewalk by minimizing, consolidating and/or eliminating vehicular access off streetswithin pedestrian environments and/or de ' nated pedestrian -oriented streets. Minimum Standard: Parking garages shall be accessed at the rear of buildings or from non -pedestrian -oriented streets when available. ❑ Minimum Standard: Surface parking driveways are prohibited on pedestrian-ariented streets. Minimum Standard: Parking lot entrances, driveways, and other vehicular access points on high visibility streets shall be PPP restricted to one entrance and exit lane per 500linear feet as measured horizontally along the street. C. PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT: Intent: To enhance the urban character of development in the Urban Center and the Center Village by creating pedestrian networks and by providing strong links from streets and drives to building entrances; make the pedestrian environment safer and more convenient, comfortable, and pleasantto walk between businesses, on sidewalks, to and from access points, and through parking lots; and promote the use of multi -modal and public transportation systems in order to reduce other vehicular traffic - 1. Pathways through Parking Lots: Intent -To ercyvide safe and attractive pedestrian connections to buildings, parking ra es, and parking lots. Minimum Standard: Clearly delineated pedestrian pathways and/or private streets shall be provided throughout parking y _ areas. Minimum Standard: Within areas, pedestrian pathways shall be provided perpendicular to the applicable parking building facade, at a maximum distance of 150 feet apart (see illustration, subsection RMC 4-3-100.G4a). 2. Pedestrian Circulation: intent: To create a network of linkages for pedestrians to improve safety and convenience and enhance the pedestrian environment Minimum Standard: Developments shall include an integrated pedestrian circulation system that connects buildings, �l d open space, and parking areas with the adjacent street sidewalk system and adjacent properties (see illustration, —khe Linn RMr &-:t-1 nn.r,4hi" - _ Minimum Standard: Sidewalks located between buildings and streets shall be raised above the level of vehicular travel. +.a .. Minimum Standard: Pedestrian pathways within parking lots or parking modules shall be differentiated by material or texture from adjacent paving materials (see illustration, subsection RMC 43-100.G4t). Staff Comment- The provided plan sets indicate that portions of the pedestrian pathways within the parking rats would he different material or texture from the adjacent paving materials, although there are some portions that appear to be asphalt with striping. As such, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant submit a new site plant that indicates the entire pedestrian pathways through the parking lot as a different material or texture from the adjacent paving prior to building permit approval This site plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Community and Economic Development project manager, Minimum standard: Sidewalks and pathways along the facades of buildings shall be of sufficient width to accommodate ant€ri ated numbers of users. Specifically: 7 (a) Sidewalks and pathways along the facades of mixed use and retail buildings 100 or more feet in width (measured along the facade) shall provide sidewalks at least 12 feet in width. The walkway shall include an 8 foot minimum unobstructed walking surface and street trees (see illustration, subsection RMC -43 -100.64d) - Staff Comment The proposed sidewalk width is Ii) -feet and the proposed landscape strip is 9 feet in width, As mentioned above in the project narrative, the City has received Capitol improvement Funds, which potently would fund the extension of the May Creek Trail, which would end at the south end of the subject parrel. in order for this trial to continue to the existing King County Trial system located north of the subject site, near VMA C, the City's Parks Department requested that the sidewalk in this area have enough width to accommodate a multi -use trial in addition to a traditional sidewalk Hotel patrons and members of the public would be using this sidewalk, in addition, trait users would be utilizing this sidewalk to connect to the grater King County trial system. Based on the anticipated number of users in this location, 10 feet would not be appropriate sidewalk width to accommodate anticipated pedestrian traffic As such, staff recommends a condition of opproval that the applicant provide an updated site plan to the City of Renton. Project Manager indicating a 12 foot sidewalk width and a 10 -foot wide landscape strip along the frontage of the 3.07 acres of the develo ent site, Prior to construction permit approval, (b) To increase business visibility and accessibility, breaks in the tree coverage adjacent to major building entries shalt be allowed. (c) For all other interior pathways, the proposed walkway shalt be of sufficient width to accommodate the anticipated number of users- A 10 -12 foot pathway, for example, can accommodate groups of persons walking four abreast, or two couples passing one another. An 8 foot pathway will accommodate three individuals walking abreast, whereas a smaller 5 - 6 foot pathway will accommodate two individuals. Minimum Standard: Locate pathways with clear sight lines to increase safety. Landscaping shall not obstruct visibility of walkwayor sight lines to buildingentries. Minimum Standard: All pedestrian walkways shall provide an all-weather walking surface unless the applicant can w^. demonstrate that the proposed surface is appropriate for the anticipated number of users and complementary to the design of the development. Guideline: Through -block connections should be made between buildings, between streets, and to connect sidewalks with public spaces. Preferred location for through -block connections is mid -block (see illustration, subsection RMC 43- Gu€define: Between buildings of up to and including two stories in height through -block connections should be at least 6 feet in width INI Guldeline: Between buildings three stories in height or greater, through -block connections should be at least 12 feet in Width Guideline: Transit sto s should be located along designated transit routes a maximum 0.25 mile apart MINUNM Guideline: As an alternative to some of the required street trees, developments may provide pedestrian -scaled light fixtures at appropriate spacing and no taller than 14 feet in height iMo less than one tree or light fixture per 30 lineal feet of the required walkway should be provided Guideline: Delineation of pathways maybe through the use of architectu ral features, such as trellises, railings, low seat walls, or similar treatment. Guideline. Mid -block connections are desirable where a strop linkage between uses can be established. Guideline: Decorative fences, with the exception of chain rink fences, may be allowed when appropriate to the situation - 3. Pedestrian Amenities: Intent To create attractive spaces that unify the building and street environments and are inviting and comfortable for pedestrians; and provide publicly accessible areas that function for a variety of activities, at all times of the year, and under typical seasonal weather conditions. Minimum Standard. Provide pedestrian overhead weather protection in the form of awnings, marquees, canopies, or building overhangs. These elements shall be a minimum of 41/2 feet wide along at least 75 percent of the length of the building facade, a maximum height of 15 feet above the ground elevation, and no lower than S feet above ground level. staff Comment AS proposed, canopies along the fagade fronting Lake Washington Boulevard exceed the minimum width standards although do not meet the minimum length standards. Canopies have been proposed to be provided for approximately 38.5 percent of the f6gode or approximately 60 liner feet The 60 feet of the fKade where canopies are proposed is along the portion of the building that would be the least distance (smallest setback) from Lake Washinaton Boulevard. Although, the proposed hotel design provides modulation along this facade that brings many portions of the structure back fram Lake Washington Boulevard where canopies would not be achieving the desired intend of overhead weather protection- As such, staff recommends approval of the proposed 60 liner feet of canopy coverage. Minimum Standard: Site furniture provided in public spaces shall be made of durable, vandal- and weather -resistant t materials that do not retain rainwater and can be reasonably maintained over an extended period of time. Minimum Standard-- Site furniture and amenities shall not impede or block pedestrian access to public spaces or building .4;= entrances. :; : _., Guideline; Transit shelters, bicycle racks, benches, trash receptacles, and other street furniture should be provided -2117--1 {' Guideline. Street amenities such as outdoor group seating, kiosks, fountains, and public art should be provided-" Guideline: Architectural elements that incorporate plants, such as facade -mounted planting boxes or trellises or ground +, related or hanging containers are encouraged, particularly at building entrances, in publicly accessible spaces, and at facades along pedestrian -oriented streets (see illustration, subsection RMC 4-3-100.640. D. LANDSCAPING/RECREATION AREAS/COMMON OPEN SPACE: intent: To provide visual relief in areas of expansive paving or structures; define logical areas of pedestrian and vehicular circulation; and add to the aesthetic enjoyment of the area by the community. To have areas suitable for both passive and active recreation by residents, workers, and visitors; provide these areas in sufficient amounts and in safe and convenient locations; and provide the opportunity for community gathering In places centrally located and designed to encourage such activity. I -Landscaping; Intent Landscaping is intended to reinforce the architecture or concept of the area; provide visual and climatic relief in areas of expansive paving or structures; channelize and define logical areas of pedestrian and vehicular circulation; and add to the aesthetic enjoyment of the area by the community. Minimum Standard: All pervious areas shall be landscaped {see RMC 4-4-070 Landscaping). gaff Minimum Standard: Street trees are required and shall be located between the curb edge and building, as determined;. by the City of Renton - Minimum Standard: On designated pedestrian -oriented streets, street trees shall be installed with tree grates. For all other streets, street tree treatment shall be as determined by the City of Renton (see illustration, subsection RMC 4-3- 100.1­I3a). Minimum Standard: The proposed landscaping shall be consistent with the design intent and program of the building, the site, and use - Minimum Standard: The landscape plan shall demonstrate how the proposed landscaping, through the use of plant 5 material and nonvegetative elements, reinforces the architecture or concept of the development. Minimum Standard: Surface parking areas shall be screened by Landscaping in order to reduce views of parked cars from streets (see RMC 4 4-0&1F7, Landscape Requirements). Such landscaping shall be at least 10 feet in width as measured from the sidewalk (see illustration, subsection RMC 4-3-100.H3b. Minimum Standard: Trees at an average minimum rate of one tree per 30 lineal feet of street frontage. Permitted tree species are those that reach a mature height of at least 35 feet. Minimum height or caliper at planting shall be eight feet or two inch caliper (as measured four feet from the top of the root ball) respectively. Minimum Standard; Shrubs at the minimum rate of one per 20 square feet of landscaped area. Shrubs shall be at least 12 inches tall at planting and have a mature height between three and four feet - Staff Comment: As proposed the shrubs meet the minimum height but the proposed rate of planning is less then one per 10 square feet of landscaped area. The applicant has proposed to use raingardens, within these areas ornamental shrubs are not proposed to be planted. The proposed raingardens reflect the applicant's desire to provide a development that minimizes its effects on the environment and/or is green'. The roingardens are ca)culoted into the landscaped area and therefore reduce the ratio cishrubs to landscaped area, -.s such, staffrecommends ap rovaf of this modification. Minimum Standard: Ground cover shall be planted insufficient quantities to provide at least 90 percent coverage of the 2 39 landscaped area within three years of installation. Minimum Standard: The applicant shall provide a maintenance assurance device, prior to occupancy, for a period of not less than three years and in sufficient amount to ensure required landscape standards have been met by the third year following installation. Minimum Standard: Surface parking with more than 14 stalls shall be landscaped as follows: �y (1) Required Amount; Total Number of Minimum Required Landscape Area` Spaces 15 to So 15 square feet/parking space 51 to 99 25 square feet/parking space Z. Recreation Areas and Common Open Space: Intent To ensure that districts have areas suitable for both passive and active recreation by residents, workers, and visitors and that these areas are of sufficient size for the intended activity and in convenient locations; create usable, accessible, and inviting open space that is accessible to the public, and promote pedestria n activity on pedestrian -oriented streets particularly at street corners. Minimum Standard: Mixed use residential and attached housing developments often or more dwelling units shall j provide a minimum area of common space or recreation area equal to 50 square feet per unit The common space area shall be aggregated to provide usable area(s) for residents. The location, layout, and proposed type of Common space or recreation area shall be subject to approval by the Director. The required common open space shall be satisfied with one or more of the elements listed below. The Director may require more than one of the following elements for developments having more than 100 units. (a) Courtyards, plazas, or multi-purpose open spaces; (b) Upper level common decks, patios, terraces, or roof gardens. Such spaces above the street level must feature views or amenities that are unique to the site and are provided as an asset to the development; (c) Pedestrian corridors dedicated to passive recreation and separate from the public street system; (d) Recreation facilities including, but not limited to, tennis/sports courts, swimming pools, exercise areas, game rooms, or other simila r facilities, or Minimum Standard: In mixed use residential and attached residential projects, required landscaping, driveways, parking, or other vehicular use areas shall not be counted toward the common space requirement or be located in ded-iceted outdoor recreation or common use areas. Minimum Standard: In mixed use residential and attached residential projects required yard setback areas shall not count toward outdoor recreation and common space unless such areas are developed as private or semi -private (from abutting or adjacent properties) courtyards, plazas or passive use areas containing landscaping and fencing sufficient to create a ful usable area accessible to all residents of the development (see illustration, subsection RMC 4-3-100.H3c), Minimum Standard: Private decks, balconies, and private ground floor open space shall not count toward the common s ee/recreation area requirement. Minimum Standard: In mixed use residential and attached residential projects, other required landscaping and sensitive° area buffers without common access links, such as pedestrian trails, shall not be included toward the reauired recreation IOD or more 35 square feet/parking space Landscape area calculations above and planting requirements below exclude perimeter parking lot landscaping areas. (2) Provide trees, shrubs, and ground cover in the required interior parking lot landscape areas. esx (3) Plant at least one tree for every slx parking spaces. Permitted tree species are those that reach a mature height of at least 35 feet. Minimum height or caliper at planting shall be eight feet or two inch caliper (as measured four feet from the top of the root ball) respectively. (4) Plant shrubs at a rate of five per 140 square Feet of landscape area. Shrubs shall be at least 16 inches tall at planting and have a nature height between three and four feet. " (5) Up to 50 percent of shrubs may be deciduous. (6) Select and plant ground cover so as to provide 90 percent coverage within three years of planting; provided, that mulch is applied until plant coverage is complete." (7) Do not locate a parking stall more than So feet from a landsca a area. Minimum Standard: Regular maintenance shall be provided to ensure that plant materials are kept healthy and that dead or dying plant materials are replaced. Minimum Standard: Underground, automatic irrigation systems are required in all landscape areas. �a " Sta(Comment: An irrigation plan was not submitted as port of the application_ Therefore staff recommends, as a condition of approval, the applicant submit an irrigation plan to and be approved by the Current Planning Project Mort er prior to corrstruction or buddin_q permit approval. Guideline. Landscaping should be used to soften and integrate the buck of buildings. Guideline: Landscaping should be provided that appropriately provides either screening of unwanted views or focuses attention to preferred views. Guideline: Use of low maintenance, drought -resistant landscape material is encouraged. Guideline: Choice of materials should reflect the level of maintenance that will be available_ Guideline: Seasonal landscaping and container plantings are encouraged, particularly at building entries and in publicly accessible spaces. Guideline. Window boxes, containers for plantings, hanging baskets, or other planting feature elements should be made of weather -resistant materials that can be reasonably maintained. Guideline: Landscaping should be used to screen parking lots from adjacent or neighboring properties. Z. Recreation Areas and Common Open Space: Intent To ensure that districts have areas suitable for both passive and active recreation by residents, workers, and visitors and that these areas are of sufficient size for the intended activity and in convenient locations; create usable, accessible, and inviting open space that is accessible to the public, and promote pedestria n activity on pedestrian -oriented streets particularly at street corners. Minimum Standard: Mixed use residential and attached housing developments often or more dwelling units shall j provide a minimum area of common space or recreation area equal to 50 square feet per unit The common space area shall be aggregated to provide usable area(s) for residents. The location, layout, and proposed type of Common space or recreation area shall be subject to approval by the Director. The required common open space shall be satisfied with one or more of the elements listed below. The Director may require more than one of the following elements for developments having more than 100 units. (a) Courtyards, plazas, or multi-purpose open spaces; (b) Upper level common decks, patios, terraces, or roof gardens. Such spaces above the street level must feature views or amenities that are unique to the site and are provided as an asset to the development; (c) Pedestrian corridors dedicated to passive recreation and separate from the public street system; (d) Recreation facilities including, but not limited to, tennis/sports courts, swimming pools, exercise areas, game rooms, or other simila r facilities, or Minimum Standard: In mixed use residential and attached residential projects, required landscaping, driveways, parking, or other vehicular use areas shall not be counted toward the common space requirement or be located in ded-iceted outdoor recreation or common use areas. Minimum Standard: In mixed use residential and attached residential projects required yard setback areas shall not count toward outdoor recreation and common space unless such areas are developed as private or semi -private (from abutting or adjacent properties) courtyards, plazas or passive use areas containing landscaping and fencing sufficient to create a ful usable area accessible to all residents of the development (see illustration, subsection RMC 4-3-100.H3c), Minimum Standard: Private decks, balconies, and private ground floor open space shall not count toward the common s ee/recreation area requirement. Minimum Standard: In mixed use residential and attached residential projects, other required landscaping and sensitive° area buffers without common access links, such as pedestrian trails, shall not be included toward the reauired recreation and common space requirement. Minimum Standard: All buildings and developments with over 30,000 square feet of nonresidential uses (excludes parking garage floorplate areas) shall provide pedestrian -oriented space (see illustration, subsection RMC 4-3-100.1-13d) accordiniz to the following formula: 2% of the lot area + 1% of the building area = Minimum amount of pedestrian -oriented Minimum Standard. To qualify as pedestrian -oriented space, the following must be included: (a) Visual and pedestrian access (including barrier -free access) to the abutting structures from the public right-of- way or a nonvehicular courtyard; (b) Paved walking surfaces of either concrete or approved unit paving; (c) on-site or building -mounted lighting providing at least four foot-randles (average) an the ground; and Staff Comment: See comment under G "Llgliting" Below. Staff was unable to determine if the applicant complies with the minimum standards at this time. (d) At least three feet of seating area (bench, ledge, etc.) or one individual seat per 60 square feet of plaza area or Minimum Standard: The following features are encouraged in pedestrian -oriented space (see illustration, subsection RMC 4-3-100.H3e) and may be required by the Director- (a) irector(a) Provide pedestrian -oriented uses on the building facade facing the pedestrian -oriented space. (b) Spaces should be positioned in areas with significant pedestrian traffic to provide interest and security — such as adjacent to a building entry. (c) Provide pedestrian -oriented facades on some or all buildings Facing the space" Provide movable public Minimum Standard: The following are prohibited within pedestrian -oriented space: (a) Adjacent unscreened parking lots; (b) Adjacent chain link fences; (c) Adjacent blank walls; (d) Adjacent dumpsters or service areas; and (e) outdoor storage (shopping carts, potting soil bags, firewood, etc.) that do not contribute to the pedestrian environment. Minimum Standard: The minimum required walkway areas shall not count as pedestrian -oriented space. However, where walkways are widened or enhanced beyond minimum requirements, the area may count as pedestrian -oriented space if the Director determines such space meets the definition of pedestrian -oriented space. Minimum Standard: The location of public open space shall be considered in relation to building orientation, sun and light exposure, and local micro -climatic conditions. Guideline: Common space areas in mixed use residential and attached residential projects should be centrally located so they are near a ma" ri of dwelling units, accessible and usable to residents, and visible from surrounding units. Guideline: Developments located at street intersections comers on designated pedestrian -oriented streets are r encouraged to provide pedestrian -oriented space adjacent to the street corner to emphasize pedestrian activity (see illustration, subwaian RMC4-3-100M3f)" law Guideline: Common space areas should be located to take advantage of surrounding features such as building entrances, significant landscaping, un' ue topography or architecture, and solar exposure. Guideline: In mixed use residential and attached residential projects children's play space should be centrally located, P= visible from the dwellings, and away from hazardous areas like garbage dumpsters, drainage facilities, streets, and oarkina areas. E. BUILDING ARCHITEUILIRAL DESIGN: Intent: To encourage building design that is unique and urban in character, comfortable on a human scale, and uses appropriate buildin materials that are suitable for the Pack Northwest climate. To discourage franchise retail architecture. L Building Character and Massing: Intent: To ensure that buildings are not bland and visually appear to be at a human scale; and ensure that all sides of a building, that can be seen by the public, are visually interesting, Minimum Standard: All building facades shall include measures to reduce the apparent scale of the building and add; C;`= a Visual interest. Examples include modulation, articulation, defined entrances, and display windows (see illustration, P9 Minimum Standard: All buildings shall be articulated with ane or more of the following:. (a) Defined entry features; (b) Window treatment; (c) Bay windows and/or balconies; (d) Roof line features; or (e) Other features as approved by the Director Minimum Standard: Single purpose residential buildings shall feature building modulation as follows (see illustration, subsection RMC 4-3-100.15b): (a) The maximum width (as measured horizontally along the building's exterior) without building modulation shall be 40 feet. (b) The minimum width of modulation shall be 15 feet. (c) The minimum depth of modulation shall be the greater of six feet or not less than two-tenths multiplied by the height of the structure (finished grade to the top of the wall). Guideline: Although streetfront buildings along designated pedestrian streets should strive to create a uniform street edge, building facades should generally be modulated and/or articulated with architectural elements to reduce the apparent size of new buildings, break up long blank walls, add visual interest, and enhance the character of the neighborhood. Guideline: Buildings should be urban in character. ' Guideline: Buildings greater than 160 feet in length should provide a variety of techniques to reduce the apparent bulk ' and scale of the facade or provide an additional special design feature such as a clock tower, courtyard, fountain, or public gathering place to add visual interest (see illustration, subsection RMC 4-3-100.ISc). 2. Ground -Level Details: Intent: To ensure that buildings are visually interesting and reinforce the intended human -stale character of the pedestrian environment; and ensure that a II sides of a building within near or distant public view have visual interest. Minimum Standard. Untreated blank wails visible from public streets, sidewalks, or interior pedestrian pathways are 9111 N prohibited. A wall (including building facades and retaining walls) is considered a blank wall if - 1111.1 (a) It is a ground floor wall or portion of a ground floor wall over six feet in height, has a horizontal length greater than 15 feet, and does not include a window, door, building modulation or other architectural detailing; or (b) Any portion of aground floor wall having a surface area of 400 square feet or greater and does not include a window, door, building modulation or other architectural detailing_ St Comment: See staff comment Section A.2. "Building Location and Orientation' above. Minimum Standard: Where blank walls are required or unavoidable, blank walls shall be treated with one or more of the following (see illustration, subsection RMC 4-3-100.15d): (a) A planting bed at least five feet in width containing trees, shrubs, evergreen ground cover, or vines adjacent to the blank wall; (b) Trellis or other vine supports with evergreen climbing vines; (c) Architectural detailing such as reveals, contrasting materials, or other special detailing that meets the intent of this standard; (d) Artwork, such as bas-relief sculpture, mural, or similar; or (e) Seating area with special paving and seasonal planting. Minimum Standard: Treatment of blank walls shall be proportional to the wall. Minimum Standard: Provide human -scaled elements such as a lighting fixture, trellis, or other landscape feature along the facade's ground floor. Minimum Standard: Facades on designated pedestrian -oriented streets shall have at least 75 percent of the linear frontage of the ground floor facade (as measured on a true elevation facing the designated pedestrian -oriented street) comprised of transparent windows and/or doors. Mlnimum Standard: Other facade window requirements include the following: (a) Building facades must have clear windows with visibility into and out of the building. However, screening may is in M be applied to provide shade and energy efficiency. The minimum amount of light transmittance for windows shall be 50 percent. b Display windows shall be desig ned for frequent than a of merchandise, rather than permanent displays. (c) Where windows or storefronts occur, they must principally contain clear glazing- (d) Tinted and dark glass, highly reflective (mirror -type) glassand film are prohibited. raw Guideline: The primary building entrance should be made visibly prominent by incorporating a minimum of ane of the following architectural features from each category listed (see illustration, subsection RMC 4-3400.I5e): (a) Facade Features: (1) Recess; (2) Overhang; (3) Canopy; (4) Trellis; (5) Portico; (6) Pore, (7) Clerestory. (b) doorway Features: (1) Transom windows; (2) Glass windows flanking door, (3) Large entry doors; J4) Ornamental lighting; (5) Lighted displays, (t) Detail Features: (1) Decorative entry paving; (2) Ornamental building name and address; (3) Planted containers; (4) Street furniture (benches, etc.). Guideline. Artwork or building ornamentation (such as mosaics, murals, grillwork, sculptures, relief, etc.) should be used to provide ground -level detail. Staff Comment: The applicant is highly encouraged to provide any and/or all of the items listed above in order to ornament the around level of the aroaosed structure. 1 Guideline: Elevated or terraced planting beds between the walkway and long building walls are encouraged. Fm I L j 3. Building Roof Lines: Intent: To ensure that roof forms provide distinctive profiles and interest consistent with an urban project and contribute to the visual continuity of the district. Minimum Standard: Buildings shall use at least one of the following elements to create varied and interesting roof " 'a Y . profiles (see illustration, subsection RMC 4-3-100.150: Minimum Standard: Corporate logos and signs shall be sized appropriately for their location. .71 (a) Extended parapets; Jtttff Comment: At this time the applicant has not submitted a detailed sign design as such, staff cannot determine t - (b) Feature elements projecting above parapets; com lionce with this standard. At the time o sin permit a praval s wilt review for this design standard. (c) Projected cornices; Minimum Standard: Prohibited signs include (see illustration, subsection RMC 4-3-100.J3a): 7.,,, - ;.. ' (d) Pitched or sloped roofs. L Pole signs; i "Zi Mirdmum Standard: Locate and screen roof -mounted mechanical equipment so that the equipment is not visible within: 150 feet of the structure when viewed from ground level. Minimum Standard: Screening features shall blend with the architectural character of the building, consistent with RMC 4-4-095E, Roof -Top Equipment. Minimum Standard: Match color of roof -mounted mechanical equipment to color of exposed portions of the roof to :53 � _;. minimize visual impacts when equipment is visible from higher elevations. r 7 Guideline: Building roof lines should be varied to add visual interest to the building`" 4. Building Materials: Intent To ensure high standards of quality and effective maintenance overtime; encourage the use of materials that reduce the visual bulk of large buildings; and encourage the use of materials that add visual interest to the neighborhood. Minimum Standard; All sides of buildings visible from a street, pathway, parking area, or open space shall be finished on " Y . all sides with the same building materials, detailing, and color scheme, or if different, with materials of the same quality. Minimum Standard: Corporate logos and signs shall be sized appropriately for their location. .71 Minimum Standard: Materials, individually or in combination, shall have an attractive texture, pattern, and quality of Jtttff Comment: At this time the applicant has not submitted a detailed sign design as such, staff cannot determine t - detailingfor all visible facades. com lionce with this standard. At the time o sin permit a praval s wilt review for this design standard. Minimum Standard: Materials shall be durable, high quality, and reasonably maintained. Minimum Standard: Prohibited signs include (see illustration, subsection RMC 4-3-100.J3a): 7.,,, - ;.. ' Minimum Standard: Buildings shall employ material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding, patterns, or L Pole signs; i "Zi textural changes" Guldeline: Building materials should be attractive, durable, and consistent with more traditional urban development. Appropriate examples would include brick, integrallycoiared concrete masonry, pre -finished metal, stone, steel, glass, and cast -in-place concrete. :53 � _;. Guideline: Concrete walls should be enhanced by texturing, reveals, snap -tie patterns, coloring with a concrete coating r 7 or admixture, or by incoT2rating embossed or sculpted surfaces, mosaics, or artwork. Guideline: Concrete block walls should be enhanced with integral color, textured blocks and colored mortar, decorative 392 `; . bond pattern and/or incorporate other masonry materials. Guideline. Stucco and similar troweled finishes should be used in combination with other more highly textured finishes 1W w or accents. They should not be used at the base of buildings between the finished floor elevation and four feet f4') above. N F. SIGNAGE. M Intent To provide a means of identifying and advertising businesses; provide directional assistance; encourage signs that are both dear and of appropriate scale forthe project; encourage quality signage that contributes to the character of the Urban Center and the Center Village; and create color and interest. Minimum Standard: Signage shall be an integral part of the design approach to the building. -'Y' Minimum Standard: Corporate logos and signs shall be sized appropriately for their location. .71 rK/11 Jtttff Comment: At this time the applicant has not submitted a detailed sign design as such, staff cannot determine com lionce with this standard. At the time o sin permit a praval s wilt review for this design standard. Minimum Standard: Prohibited signs include (see illustration, subsection RMC 4-3-100.J3a): 7.,,, - ;.. ' L Pole signs; ii. Roof signs; iii. Back-lit signs with letters or graphics on a plastic sheet (can signs or illuminated cabinet signs). Exceptions: Back- lit logo signs less than ten (10) square feet are permitted as are signs with only the individual letters bark lit. (see staff comment above) Minimum Standard: In moved use and multi-use buildings, signage shall be coordinated with the overall building design, 1554 (see staff comment above) Minimum Standard: Freestanding ground-related monument signs, with the exception of primary entry signs, shall be limited to five feet above finished grade, including support structure. All such signs shall include decorative landscaping (ground cover and/or shrubs) to provide seasonal interest in the area surrounding the sign. Alternately, signage may incorporate stone, brick, or other decorative materials as approved by the Director. (see staff comment above) Minimum Standard: Entry signs shall be limited to the name of the larger development. (see staff comment above) Guideline: Alteration of trademarks notwithstanding, corporate signage should not be garish in color nor overly lit, although creative design, strong accent colors, and interesting surface materials and lighting techniques are encouraged. (see sraffcomment above) Guideline: Front-lit, ground-mounted monument signs are the preferred type of freestanding sign. (see sta comment above) Guideline: Blade type signs, proportional to the building facade on which they are mounted, are encouraged on pedestrian-oriented streets. (see staff comment above) G. LIGHTING: intent: To ensure safety and security; provide adequate lighting levels in pedestrian areas such as plazas, pedestrian walkways, panting areas, building entries, and other public places; and increase the visual attractiveness of the area at all times of the day and night. Minimum Standard: LlrthtiM shall pnform to on-site exterior lighting_re$ula,tions located in RMC 4-4-475. Lighting, Exterior On-Site. OEM Staff Comment Staff recommended, as a condition of Approval, the applicant be 'required to provide a lighting plan that adequately provides for public safety without casting excessive glare on adjacent properties at the time of building permit review. Pedestrian scale and downlighting shall be used in all cases to assure safe pedestrian and vehicular movement; unless alternative pedestrian scale lighting has been approved administratively or is specifically listed as exem t om igmtsiom located in RMC 4-4-075 Lighting, Exterior On.-Site- Minimum Standard: Lighting shall be provided on-site to increase security, but shall not be allowed to directly projectEdoff-site. !Comment. See Condition above Minimum Standard. Pedestrian-scale lighting shall be provided, for both safety and aesthetics, along all streets, at primary and secondary building entrances, at building facades, and at pedestrian-oriented spaces. St Comment See Condition above Guideline: Accent lighting should be provided at focal points such as gateways, public art, and significant landscape features such as specimen trees. Guideline: Additional lighting to provide interest in the pedestrian environment may include sconces on building facades, awnings with down-lighting, decorative street lighting, etc. December 7, 2009 Monday, 7 p.m. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting Council Chambers M I N U T E S Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Law called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF RANDY CORMAN, Council President; GREG TAYLOR; RICH ZWICKER; TERRI COUNCILMEMBERS BRIERE; KING PARKER; DON PERSSON; MARCIE PALMER. CITY STAFF IN ATTENDANCE DENTS LAW, Mayor, JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative Officer; ANN NIELSEN, Assistant City Attorney; JASON SETH, Deputy City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Public Works Administrator; IWEN WANG, Finance and Information Services Administrator; ALEX PIETSCH, Community and Economic Development Administrator; MARTY WINE, Assistant CAO; PETER RENNER, Facilities Director; SUZANNE DALE ESTEY, Economic Development Director; CHIP VINCENT, Planning Director; CHIEF KEVIN MILOSEVICH and DEPUTY CHIEF TIM TROXEL, Police Department. APPEAL Planning and Development Committee Chair Parker presented a report Planning & Development ITregardingthe Hawk's Landing Mixed Use Site Plan application (LUA-09-060). Committee: e Committee heard this appeal on 12/3/2009. Pursuant to RMC 4-8-110.F., Appeal: Hawk's Landing Mixed the Committee's decision and recommendation is limited to the record, which Use, Alpert International & consists of, but is not limited to, the Hearing Examiner's Report, the Notice of Nicholson, SA -09-060 Appeal, and the submissions and presentations made by the respective parties_ Background -The subject site is located at 4350 Lake Washington Boulevard N. in Renton, AWA, and is approximately 7.8 acres in size. The site is surrounded to the north sand east by existing Washington State Department of Transportation right-of- way for 1-405, and to the south by an underdeveloped parcel that contains May Creek (a Class 1 water body) with at least two associated wetlands (Category 2). Alpert International, LLP ("Applicant') seeks to develop 3.07 acres on the northerly portion of the subject site with "Hawk`s Landing" hotel, a five -story hotel that would include retail, fitness center, spa and restaurant. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Applicant submitted a request for SEPA review and Master Site Plan/Site Plan review for the proposed Hawk's Landing hotel. The Environmental Review Committee. issued a DNS -M with ten (10) mitigation conditions. Brad Nicholson, and South End Gives Back ("Appellant") timely appealed the SEPA determination. On 8/25/2009, a public hearing was held before the Hearing Examiner on the SEPA appeal and the Master Site Plan/Site Plan Appellant appeared and presented at both portions of the hearing. The Hearing Examiner affirmed the SEPA determination and approved the Master Site Plan and Site Plan subject to ten (10) conditions. Both Applicant and Appellant then filed respective motions for reconsideration. Appellant also submitted a request to include new evidence, to wit, the "Second Declaration of Joel Massman" their expert witness. Applicant filed a Motion to Strike this declaration. On 10/19/2009 the Hearing Examiner issued the reconsideration affirming his original decision with a small modification to December 7, 2009 Renton City Council Minutes Page 368 condition #10 of the Master Site Plan/Site Plan ruling, as it pertains to street trees and landscaping on the remainder of the project site. He also granted the Motion to Strike, denying Appellants' request to have the Second Declaration included in the record. Both parties timely appealed both the SEPA and the Master Site Plan/Site Plan ruling to the City Council. RECOMMENDATION DECISION Having considered the comments made by the respective parties, and having reviewed the submissions, files and evidence in this matter, the Committee recommends that the Hearing Examiner's ruling to grant the Motion to Strike be affirmed, and that the Hearing Examiner's decision regarding the SEPA appeal be affirmed. The Committee further recommends that the Council finds that the Hearing Examiner made a substantial error of law in that the Hearing Examiner erroneously required "best available science" as a standard for stormwater j treatment. Accordingly, the Committee recommends that the following modifications be made to the September 10, 2009 Report and Decision, but otherwise affirm the approval of the Master Site Plan/Site Plan and conditions_ Conclusion 5:...Those water should be handled with respect and appropriately treated by whatever water retention, detention, or "rain garden" feature is used. The applicant must comply with the City of Renton's standards regarding stormwater (the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual). Ue appliwRt should use best available .. tr atli;g sto ester beFnrn co it t.. the adsi.J.. WaShiVOR W" 9lIUt2At5 GFeat9d OF r•nlle.-+.,.f .,., this ite's ed Conclusion 5: _The Master Plan process does include 'master planning' for the entire subject site. While the applicant is trying to confine its footprint, the spare nature of the remaining site will detract from what appears to be a quality image. .. r0. ,...e.r .., the ,t at le rt m al'y The Master Plan cannot escape that there is a much larger site that suffers from old, deteriorating buildings that will reflect on the current proposal. This office believes that the applicant and staff can work on a plan that accommodates additional landscaping, even temporary landscaping in planter boxes with some larger trees to screen or breakup the view of the background unsightly portions of the site east and west of the parking areas. AdditioRally, trees along the FeFnaiRiRg Lake WashillgtGR RewleVaFd 443Rtage at -the Decision Condition 9: ... The applicant shall comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual use best -available s e in treating stormwater before conveying it to the roadside ditch. T#e Fete ,t:... dateRtign, er- ., garde." fe@tUre :. ^Fder to reduee Pollution entering -the diteh and then May-Creek.Thee�ele�eat Shall AGt jeopardize May Gfeek and�or- �ake WashingtOR with pollutants i December 7, 2D09 Renton City Council Minutes Page 369 Decision Condition 10: ... The applicant and staff shall work on a plan that accommodates additional landscaping within the boundaries of the current site plan application, even temporary landscaping in planter boxes with some larger trees to screen or breakup the view of the background unsightly portions of the site east and west of the parking areas. the applicant shalt plant r ell sy At rho same at:., and r pedes as is planted along the nr.rth frf,>,}ar.a MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL CONCUR iN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Chief Administrative Officer Covington reviewed a written administrative report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2009 and beyond. Item noted included: The Highlands Neighborhood Community Center will be open 12/8/2009 from 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. to serve residents as a warming shelter. Residents in need of assistance during regular business hours should call Human Services at 425-430-6650. After 5 p.m. call 425 -430 -7500 - AUDIENCE COMMENT William Taylor (King County) expressed opposition to the dismissal of the Red Citizen Comment: Taylor- Mill Annexation proposal. Fre opined that the Fairwood incorporation effort is Greater Fairwood Community not financially feasible with or without the Red Mill area. Mr. Taylor also Proposed Election commented that King County spends 70% of its budget on the judicial system and only 10% on urban areas. He remarked that the City of Renton has the infrastructure and ability to provide services to Fairwood residents. Discussion ensued regarding King County's likelihood of supporting the Red Mill annexation, the City's inability to take advantage of the State sales tax credit if the Red Mill area was annexed singularly, the importance of the tax credit for providing services in the area, and the 180 -day signature validity period. CONSENT AGENDA Items listed on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At the request of Councilmember Taylor, item 6.c. was removed for separate consideration. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 11/23/2009. Council concur. 11/23/2009 Appointment: Airport Advisory Mayor Law appointed Robert Brahm to the Airport Advisory Committee, Committee Airport -at -Large primary position, for a term expiring on 5/7/2012 (position previously held by Greg Garner); and Ulf Goranson, Airport -at -Large alternate position, for a term expiring on 5/7/2012 (position previously held by Mike Rogan). Refer to Community Services Committee. City Clerk: eCityGov Alliance City Clerk recommended adoption of a resolution to establish the Small Works Small Works Roster & Roster and Limited Public Works processes, and authorize the use of the Processes eCityGov Alliance rosters for City purchases and contracting. Refer to Finance Committee. CAG: 09-187, Sidewalk City Clerk reported bid opening on 11/30/2009 for CAG -09-187, Sidewalk Rehabilitation & Replacement, Rehabilitation & Replacement Project; 25 bids; engineer's estimate Archer Construction $452,818.95; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, Archer Construction, Inc_, in the amount of $288,581.23. Council concur. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT December 7, 2009 In re Appeal of HAWKS LANDING by Brad Nicholson and South End Gives Back LUA 09-060, ECF, SA -M, SA -H (Referred November 16, 2009) APPROVED 13Y CITY COUNCIL Date Ta,7 The Planning and Development Committee ("Committee") heard this appeal on December 3, 2009. Pursuant to RMC 4-8-110F, the Committee's decision and recommendation is limited to the record, which consists of, but isnot limited to, the Hearing Examiner's Report, the Notice of Appeal and the submissions and presentations made by the respective parties. BACKGROUND The subject site is located at 4350 Lake Washington Boulevard N. in Renton, WA, and is approximately 7.8 acres in size. The site is surrounded to the north and east by existing. Washington State Department of Transportation right-of-way for 1-405, and to the south -by an underdeveloped parcel that contains May Creek (a Class 1 water body) with at least two associated wetlands (category 2). Alpert International LLP ("Applicant") seeks to develop 3.07 acres on the northerly portion of the subject site with "Hawks Landing" hotel, a 5 story, hotel that would include retail, fitness center, spa and a restaurant. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Applicant submitted a request for SEPA review and Master Site Plan/Site Plan review for the proposed Hawks Landing hotel. The Environmental Review Committee issued a DNS -M with ten. (10) mitigation conditions. Brad Nicholson, and. South End Gives Back ("Appellant") timely appealed the SEPA determination. On August 25, 2009, a public hearing was held before the Hearing Examiner on the SEPA appeal and the Master Site Plan/Site Plan. Appellant appeared and presented at both portions of the hearing_ The Hearing Examiner affirmed the SEPA determination and approved the Master Site Plan and Site Plan subject to ten (10) conditions. Both Applicant and Appellant then filed respective motions for reconsideration. Appellant also submitted a request to include new evidence, to wit, the "Second Declaration .of Joel Massman" their expert witness. Applicant filed a Motion to Strike this declaration. On October 19, 2009, the Hearing Examiner issued the reconsideration affirming his original decision with a small modification to condition 10 of the Master Site Pian/Site Plan ruling, as it pertains to street trees and landscaping on the remainder of the project site. He also granted the Motion to Strike, denying Appellant's request to have the Second Declaration included into the record. Both parties timely appealed both the SEPA and the Master Site Plan/Site Plan ruling to the City Council. Hawks Landing Appeal December ", 2004 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION DECISION: Having considered the comments made by the respective parties, and having reviewed the submissions, files and evidence in this matter, the Committee recommends that the Hearing Examiner's ruling to grant the Motion to Strike be affirmed, and that the Hearing Examiner's decision regarding the.SEPA appeal be affirmed. The Committee further recommends that the Council finds that the Hearing Examiner made a substantial error of law in that the Hearing Examiner erroneously required "best available science" as a standard for stormwater treatment. Accordingly, the Committee recommends that the following modifications be made to the September 10, 2009 Report and Decision, but otherwise affirm the approvat of the Master Site Plan/Site Plan and conditions. Conclusion 5: ....Those waters should be handled with respect and appropriately treated by whatever water retention, detention, or "rain garden" feature is used. The applicant must comply with the City of.Renton's standards re ardin stormwater the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual). The app"eant Conclusion 6. ....The Master Plan process does include `master planning' for the entire subject site. While the applicant is trying to confine its footprint, the spare nature of the remaining site will detract from what appears to be a quality image. The Master Plan cannot escape that there is a much larger site that suffers from old, deteriorating buildings that will reflect on the current proposal. This office believes that the applicant and staff can work on a plan that accommodates additional landscaping, even temporary landscaping in planter boxes with some larger trees to screen or breakup the view of the background unsightly portions of the site east and west of the parking areas. Additiefiallythe Y plieam =chind plant a dditte nal Str tit Decision Condition 9: The applicant shall comply with the_2005 King County Surface Water Design Manua in treating stormwater before conveying it to the roadside ditch. Hawks Landimg Appeal December *, 2W9 Page 3 Decision Condition 10: The applicant and staff shall work on a plan that accommodates additional landscaping within the boundaries of the current site plan application, even temporary landscaping in planter boxes with some larger trees to screen or breakup the view of the background unsightly portions of the site east and west of the parking areas. ^ ddiV Rally -i., the .,vent that the City d9ps not plaF t applicant shall plast 5ueh tr-ee� cA the same r-atie and species as i� plant ed along the ...a h #QRtager ,r I KING PARKER, Chair -Not in Attendance - TERRI BRIERE Vice Chair RICH ZWICKER, Me cc: Alex Pietsch .Chip Vincent Jennifer Henning Vanessa Dolbee Fred Kaufman Appellant Brad Nicholson/SEGB (via Attorney Keith Scully) Applicant Alpert International LLC (via Attorney Jack McCullough) Ann Nielsen 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9' 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Motion for Summary Judgmeni November 5, 201( Without Oral Argument BEFORE THE SHORELINES HEARINGS BOARD IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON In re the appeal of Renton's Shoreline Substantial Development Permit LUA10-041, BCM, SM, Brad Nicholson, V. CITY OF RENTON, Appellant, Respondent. Case NO. SHB#10-016 Declaration of Suzanne Dale Estey in Support of Renton's Motion to for Summary Judgment pursuant to CR56 Suzanne Dale Estey hereby declares under penalty of perjury, pursuant to the laws of the State of Washington that the following is true and correct to the best of my knowledge: 1. That I am over 18 years of age and am competent to testify in this matter. 2. 1 am the Director of Economic Development, for Respondent, City of Renton, Declaration in Support —Page 1 4 Y Q Renton Clty Attorney 100 5 2nd St � PO Sox 829 + + Renton, WA 98057-0626 Phone: 425.255.8678 r�� Fax: 425255.5474 6 9 i 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (hereinafter "Renton") in the above -referenced action. 3. 1 attended and graduated from Whitman College, Walla Walla, WA in 1992 with a B.A., Sociology and Politics, with Distinction; I attended the University of Southern California, Los Angeles/Washington D.C., Satellite Campus, and completed coursework toward a Master's Degree in Public Administration from 1995 through 1996; and I attended the Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, and earned a M.A. in Public Administration in 2001. 4. From 1998 to 20061 worked for several different entities in a variety of positions related to public administration. 5. From 2006 to the present, I have worked for the City of Renton as the Economic Development Director, responsible for managing Renton's business retention and recruitment, real estate investment, community development, and enhancement of prosperity and livability goals. I have significantly participated in the development of The Landing, the new Seattle Seahawks headquarters, established a Shop Local campaign, and serve as the primary liaison between Renton and The Boeing Company. I also manage the City's intergovernmental relations and am responsible for securing multiple multi-million dollar state investments in infrastructure and annexation assistance. 6. Attached hereto as exhibits are true and correct copies of the following: a. 2009-2011 Grant Programs Direct -Appropriation Projects, Contract Readiness Survey, (hereinafter "Exhibit A"); and b. Capital Agreement between: City of Renton and Public Works Board, (hereinafter "Exhibit B"). Declaration in Support — Page 2 Y Renton City Attorney 100 S 2i' St U P4 Box 826 } .,� ♦ Renton, WA 98057-0626 i� Phone: 425.255.6678 NrrC1 Fax: 425.255.5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 s 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 7. In February 2009, Renton submitted a request to the State Legislature for an economic and infrastructure grant from the state. (See ExhibitA). 8. Renton requested a grant to fund a storm drainage system, a water line extension, property acquisition along May Creek, the extension of the May Creek Trail and related infrastructure improvements known as the "Exit 7 Area Improvements Project," which I is between Lake Washington Boulevard and 1-405 southbound exit. 9. Renton sought this funding before and without knowledge as to whether the proposed "Hawk's Landing Hotel" development would obtain sufficient financing to be developed. 10. As of today, to the best of my knowledge, the proponents of the "Hawles Landing Hotel" are still seeking funding to build the hotel. Needless to say, in this economic climate, it is very uncertain whether or not the "Hawk's Landing Hotel" will obtain the needed funding to move forward. 11. On or about December 21, 2009, the Washington State Public Works Board agreed to enter into the Capitan Agreement, and that agreement's Attachment 1: Project Scope of Work, (Exhibit B, p. 20-21) notes that the project's scope of work is comprised of the installation of a storm drainage system, a water line extension and a May Creek trail connector. DATED THIS 1 November 2010, at Renton, Washington. CITY OF RENTON Suza ale Estey Eco mic Development Director City of Renton Declaration in Support — Page 3 Renton City Attorney j 100 S Intl St Box 626 + � ♦ Renton, WA 98057-0626 Phone. 425.255.8678 rNrr� Fax: 425.255.5474 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COM,MUNITY,TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 128 - 101" Avenue 5W • PO Sox 42525 ' Olympia, Washington 98504-2525 • (360) 725-4000 February 4, 2010 Ms. Suzanne Dale Estey City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way, 6th Floor Renton, WA 98057-3232 RE: 2009-2011 Washington State Capital Budget Direct -Appropriation Grant LG09-951-121 Dear Ms. Dale Estey_ Enclosed is a fully executed Direct -Appropriation Grant contract between City of Renton and the Public Works Board This contract is for the Renton Hawk's Landing project. Please keep this original document with the other local records related to your project_ Once contracts are executed by the Public Works Board they are transferred to the Contracts Administration Unit (CAU) for rvntract and project management I will be your CAU project manager and look forward to working with you and your staff on this project. The Al 9 vouchers, project status report, and step-by-step instructions have been emailed to you in electronic format (Excel file). Please use those forms to complete your requests for reimbursement and mail the documents to: Jennifer Lansidel Department of Commerce Attn: Contracts Administration Unit P. 4. Box 42525 Olympia, WA 98504-2525 If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call me at (360) 725-2741 or email me at Jennifer) ansidel@commerce_wa-gov. Sincerely, Jennifer Lansidel Contracts Administration Unit Project Manager Enclosures 0 2009-2011 Public Words Board Direct -Appropriation Projects _ instructions for Requesting Dost Reimbursement IMPORTANT INFORMATION -PLEASE READ Etigibte Costs Grant funds will be disbursed on a reimbursement basis only. Only expenses incurred on or after May 15, 2009, are eligible for reimbursement '(i.e., services that have been provided or goods that have been purchased on or after May 15, 2009). These expenses can be paid or be payable within 30 days to be eligible for reimbursement. please refer to your contract, Section 1.8. Project Expenditures Eligible for Reimbursement, to identify the eligible cost categories allowed under this contract Also, a more detailed explanation of eligible and ineligible costs is provided herein. Billing Procedures and Payment Your contract describes the process you must follow in order to make requests for reimbursement (please refer to Section 1.9. Billing Procedures and Payment). Each disbursement request must be made on an Al Invoice Voucher and be accompanied by a Project Status Report and supporting documentation such as invoices, receipts, etc. Each request may include costs incurred over an extended period of time. However, you cannot make requests for reimbursement more often than once a month. Mail requests for reimbursement to the Contracts Administration Unit (CAU) at the following address: Washington State Department of Commerce Contracts Administration Unit PO Box 42525, Olympia, WA 98504--2525 CAU staff will review your disbursement request and documentation upon receipt. If all conditions are met, you will normally receive funds within two weeks of the req u est. You are encouraged to establish an Electronic Fund Transfer (EFT) account to receive your payments. Contact the Office of Financial Management staff at (350) 664-7779 to request information on how to set up an EFT account, or send an email to vendorhelpdesk(jPofm.wa.gov. A19 invoice Voucher Requests for reimbursement must be submitted on a Department of Commerce A99 Invoice Voucher form. This form has been provided to you in electronic format (Excel file). Please follow the step-by-step instruction included in the Excel file. Once completed, print the Al Invoice Voucher and ensure that it is dated and signed (!n BLUE ink) by an official authorized by your organization. Project Status Report and DocurnentaWn (must be attached to the A19 Invoice Voucher) Requests for reimbursement mast also include a Project Status Report and documentatlon that supports evidence of costs incurred (or payable within 30 days), such as bills or receipts from contractors or suppliers. The Project Status Report has also been provided to you in electronic format (Excel file). Please follow the step-by-step instruction included in the Excel file_ This form will automatically calculate your expenses to date for each cost category and compare them to your estimated amounts indicated in your contract (refer to Attachment lll: Estimated Project Costs in your contract). Please note that you can make modifications not to exceed 150A of each cost category (refer to Section 1.7. Modification to Project Costs). If any of your cost category modifications exceed 15%, please contract CAU as they will need a written notification from you prior to processing your request for reimbursement. Final Payment (10% of the. grant amount will be retained until project coretion) An amount equal to 10% of your total grant amount will be withheld until your project is completed. Refer to Section 1.10. Certified Project Completion Report and Final Payment. When the activities identified in your contract's Scope of Work are complete, you must submit a Cerdited Project Completion Report. The Certified Project Completion Report is an electronic web -form that must to be submitted in PWeB, the Public Works Board's web -based contract management database. If you haven't been provided with a PWeB login and password yet, please contact Corina Grigoras at (360) 725-3160 and she will provide the necessary training and your PWeB access information. Your final request for reimbursement must accompany the Certified Project Completion Report, Was igton State CAG -10-009 r Public Works Board 906 Columbia SU mt SW Post Office Box 45319 Olympia, Washington 98504-8319 (360) 7Z5-3150 www.pwb.wa.gov Capital Agreement between: For: City of Renton and Public Works Board Project Name: Renton Hawk's Landing Contract Number: LG09-951-121 Project Type: 2009-2011 Washington State Capital Budget Direct -Appropriation Execution /Start Date: Date of Contract Execution Department of Commerce innovation is in our nature. TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTRACT FACE SHEET ................................. ...................................................... ............... 1 Part 1. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ........................................................................ 2 11 DEFINITIONS ...... ......................... —'................................................... —....... —''2 1.2. AUTHORITY ............... ...... ............................. ....... ............................. 2 1.3. PURPOSE ......... ..................................................................... ................................ 2 1A. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE ... .................................................................................. 2 1.5. GRANT AMOUNT ...................................... —............ ................. —...................... s 1.6. CERTIFICATION OFFUNDS .................................................................................... 3 1.7. MODIFICATION TO THE PROJECT COGTG'...................................................... 3 1.8. PROJECT EXPENDITURES ELIGIBLE FOR REIMBURSEMENT --.---.--.Q 1.9. BILLING PROCEDURES AND PAYMENT ................ .—...... ................. ............... 4 1.1O\CERTIFIED PROJECT COMPLETION REPOATAND FINAL PAYMENT .............. 5 1.11.REPORTS ................................ —...... —........ '................................................... 5 1.12. EVALUATION AND MONITORING ................... ...................... ............................... 5 1J3.OWNERSHIP DF FACILITIES .................................... ........... W 1.14.CHANGE OFOWNERSHIP QRUSE FORCONTRACTOR-OWNED PROPERTY 8 1.15 - CHANGE OFUSE FOR LEASED PROPERTY ........... —......... ................... —....... 6 1.16. HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL ARTIFACTS ..... ..................................................... 8 1.17'SIGNAGE, MARKERS, AND PUBLICATIONS —....................... ............. .......... —6 1.18- PREVAILING WAGE LAW ....... .--.................. ............... ............ ...................... 7 ' 1.19. INSURANCE ...................... ................. --...... ......... ------- ......... .................. ......... T 1.20RECAPTURE PROVISION ....................... ............ —........ —................ ................ Q 1.21.REDUCTION |NFUNDS ................. --............ ''—........................................ .—'� 1.22. REAPPROPRIATION ...... '............. ................................. ------ '------------ ........... ''� Part2_ GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS. ............................................... 2-1. DEFINITIONS ........... —_---_^—....... ..................... ................... --------------- 10 2.2. ALLOWABLE COSTS ............................. --.......... .......... ......... ................. —..1O 2.3. ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN ........ .................................................. ------ 8 2.4. AMENDMENTS ..................................................... ................................................. 1O 2,5. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (AdDA)OF1$$D PUBLIC LAW 101-336, ALSO REFERRED TQASTHE'ADA- 28CFR PART 35 ................................. —..10 2.6. APPROVAL .................... ................................. .................................. ... .... ........ .10 2.7. ASSIGNMENT ............... —-------------------------------------------------------- .... .............. ------ 10 2.$. ATTORNEY8^FEES............................... ____ ......... --... ........................... ....11 2�9_ AUDIT .... -------'_-----_------.-------_-----.-1i ��1O.CODE REQUIRE�E�QlS-------_-------___'----_--.12 2-11.CON ROENTIALITY/5AFEGUARD|NGOFINFORMATION .................................. 12 2.12. CONFORMANCE ....................... —.--^--_---............. .......................... 13 2'13.COPYRIGHT PROVISIONS ........................................ .......................................... 1n 2-14.DISALLOWED COSTS ........................... .---------------- ........................... 13 2J5^ DISPUTES .................................................................................................. ........... 13 2.16. DUPLICATE PAYMENT ............. .......... .............. ......................................... 14 pwm TudemomOents 2.18- GL _RNING LAW AND VENUE--......................................................................... 14 2.19. INDEMNIFICATION................................................................................................14 2.20. INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF THE CONTRACTOR... ........................................ 14 2-21. INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE COVERAGE...............................................................15 2.22. LAWS......................................................................................................................15 2.23. LICENSING, ACCREDITATION AND REGISTRATION .................................. -.-....15 2.24. LIMITATION OF AUTHORITY................................................................................15 2.25. LOCAL PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION COORDINATION.......................................15 2.26. NONCOMPLIANCE WITH NONDISCRIMINATION LAWS....................................16 2.27. POLITICAL ACTIVITIES.........................................................................................16 2.28. PREVAILING WAGE LAW ...... .......... ........,........,.....................----------- .................,..16 2.29. PROHIBITION AGAINST PAYMENT OF BONUS OR COMMISSION -......-------.-..16 2-30. PUBLICITY..............................................................................................................16 2,31. RECAPTURE......................................................--------...---.............--...------......---.....16 2.32. RECORDS MAINTENANCE...................................................................................16 2.33. REGISTRATION WITH DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.........................................17 2.34. RIGHT OF INSPECTION__ .................................................................................. 17 2.35, SAVINGS................................................................................................................ 17 2.36. SEVERABIUTY.......................................................................................................17 2.37. SUBCONTRACTING...............................................................................................17 2,38. SURVIVAL................................................................................................................ 18 2.39- TAXES ....................................................... ................... ......... I--............................. is 2.40. TERMINATION FOR CAUSE/ SUSPENSION-_ ------- .................................. 18 2.41- TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE................................................................... 18 2.42. TERMINATION PROCEDURES............................................................................18 2.43. WAIVER.................................................................................................................. 19 ATTACHMENT I: PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK..................................................................20 ATTACHMENT 11, CERTIFICATION OF THE AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS TO COMPLETE THEPROJECT....................................................................................... .......................... 22 ATTACHMENT III: ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS..............................................................24 ATTACHMENT IV: CERTIFICATION OF THE PAYMENT AND REPORTING OF PREVAILINGWAGES...............................................................................................:.............25 ATTACHMENT V: CERTIFICATION OF THE INTENT TO ENTER THE LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (LEER) CERTIFICATION PROCESS ............. 26 C1g4 Df Rer W Page 9 Tahfe of C ftf is LG09-951-121 12f21TL00B 2009-2011 Diraci-Approprf 6w Caihart CONTRACT FACE SHEET Contract Number: LG09-951-121 Washington State Department of Commerce PUBLIC WORKS BOARD 2009-2011 GRANT PROGRAMS—DIRECT-APPROPRIATION PROJECTS 1. Contractor 2. Contractor Doing Business As (optional) City of Renton N/A 1055 S Grady Way, 6th Floor, Renton, WA 98056 3, Contractor Representative 4. Public Works Board Representative Suzanne Dale Estey Corina Grigoras, Special Programs Manager, Public Works Board 1055 S Grady Way, 6th Floor PO Box 4&319, Olympia, WA 98504-8319 Renton, WA 98056 Clare Billings, Managing Director, Contracts Administration Unit PO Box 42525, Olympia, WA 98504-2525 5. Contract Amount 6. Funding Source 7. Contract 8. Contract End Date Start Date 24 months from contract $1,700,000.D0 Federal: ❑ State: 0 Other: El NIA: [I Contract Contract Date execution (provided that funds are re -appropriated into the 2011-2013 biennium 9_ Federal Funds (as applicable) Federal Agency CFDA Number N/A N/A NIA iu. Tax lD # 11. SWV # 12. U81 # 13. DUNS # 916001271 14. Contract Purpose The Board and the Contractor have entered into this Contract to undertake a legislatively -approved project that furthers the goals and objectives of Washington State, as indicated in the Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1216, Section 1050 (4), enacted on May 15 2009. The Board, defined as the Washington State Public Works Board, and Contractor acknowledge and accept the terms of this Contract and attachments and have executed this Contract on the date below to start as of the date and year last written below. The rights and obligations of both parties to this Contract are governed by this Contract and tate following other documents incorporated by reference: Contractor Terms and Conditions including ATTACHMENT I: PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK; ATTACHMENT II: CERTIFICATION OF THE AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT; ATTACHMENT 111' ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS; ATTACHMENT IV: CERTIFICATION OF THE PAYMENT AND REPORTING OF PREVAILING WAGES; and ATTACHMENT V: CERTIFICATION OF INTENT TO ENTER THE LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGiV LEED CERTIFICATION PROCESS. FOR THE RACTOR FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS BOARD Signature! it - Jo n LaAocque, ecutive Diraci& Denis Lau, Mayor. Gt7 Print Name Date Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORlilt ONLY True This 7h Day of December, 2009 t Rob McKenna Attorney General Date Signature on File Attest- Kathryn Wyatt f , % Assistant Attorney General _ Bonnie I. Walton; City Clerk - cay of Rami Page 1 Contrast Face Shad LGD9-951-121 1212V2009 20Q-2011 Dirad4ppropddbn CoMw CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS PUBLIC WORKS BOARD 2009-2011 GRANT PROGRAMS---DIRECT-APPROPRIATION PROJECTS Part 1. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1.1. DEFINITIONS As used throughout this 2009-2011 Washington State Capital Budget Direct -Appropriation Contract the following terms shall have the meaning set forth below: A. `Contract' shall mean this 2009-2011 Washington State Capital Budget Direct -Appropriation Contract B- `Contractor shall mean the entity identified on the Contract Face Sheet performing service(s) under this Contract and who is a party to the Contract, and shall include all employees and agents of the Contractor. C. 'The Board' shall mean the Washington State Public Works Board created in Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.155.030, and who is a Party to the Contract. 1.2. AUTHORITY Acting under the authority of Chapter 43.155 RCW, the Board has awarded the Contractor a 2009- 2011 Washington State Capital Budget Direct -Appropriation grant for a legislatively -approved project The Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1215, Section 1050 (4), enacted on May 15, 2009, made an appropriation to support the Temporary Public Works Board Grant Program and directed the Board to administer those funds. 1.3. PURPOSE The Board and the Contractor have entered into this Contract to undertake a legislatively -approved project that furthers the goals and objectives of Washington State. The project will be undertaken by the Contractor and will include the activities identified in ATTACHMENT 1: PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK The project must be undertaken in accordance with the Contract terms and conditions, and all applicable state and local laws and .ordinances, which by this reference are incorporated into this Contract as though set forth fully herein. , 1.4. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE In the event of an inconsistency in this Contract, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order: A. Applicable federal and State of Washington statutes and regulations. B. Special Terms and Conditions including all the attachments. C. General Terms and Conditions. 1.5. GRANT AMOUNT The Board shall pay an amount not to exceed the awarded grant amount of $1,700,000.OQ for the eligiblo costs necessary for or incidental to the performance of work as set forth in A77ACHMENT l: PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK Cly of R&Tbn Page 2 CanlradTelms and Ovift ns LGOM51-121 1212112009 20DO-2011 Diiech4pp widw Cat-dd 1.6. CERTIFICATION OFF ND A_ The release of state funds under this Contract is contingent upon the Contractor certifying that it has expended or has access to funds from other sources as set forth in ATTACHMENT II: CERTIFICATION OF THE AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT to complete all the project activities identified in ATTACHMENT 1: PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK Such'sources may consist of a combination of any of the following: i. Loans or grants. ii_ _ Eligible project expenditures prior to the execution of this contract. iii. Cash dedicated to the project. iv. Funds available through a letter of credit or other binding loan commitment(s). v. Pledges from foundations or corporations. vi. Pledges from individual donors. vii. The value of real property when acquired solely for the purposes of this project, as established and evidenced by a current market value appraisal performed by a licensed, professional real estate appraiser, or a current property tax statement. The Board will not consider appraisals for prospective values of such property for the purposes of calculating the amount of matching fund credit. viii. In-kind contributions, subject to the Board's approval. B. The Contractor shall maintain records sufficient to evidence that it has access to or has expended funds from such sources, and shall make such records available for the Board's review upon reasonable request. 1.7. MODIFICATION TO THE PROJECT COSTS Notwithstanding any other provision of this Contract, the Contractor may, at its discretion, matte modifications not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of each cost category item in the ATTACHMENT Ill: ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS_ The Contractor shall notify the Board in writing when making any budget modifications that would exceed fifteen percent (15%) of any cost category fine item as identified in ATTACHMENT I[I: ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS. Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit an increase in the amount of grant as set forth Section 1.5 of this Contract. 1.5. PROJECT EXPENDITURES ELIGIBLE FOR REIMBURSEMENT Payments to the Contractor shall be made on a reimbursement basis only. For the purposes of this Contract, eligible costs shall be construed to mean costs incurred and paid, or costs incurred and payable within thirty (30) days. Only costs that have been incurred on or after May 15, 2009, are eligible for reimbursement under this Contract The Contractor may be reimbursed for eligible costs related to the activities identified in ATTACHMENT 1: PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK, in the toilowing cost categories: A. Real property and costs directly associated with such purchase, when purchased or acquired solety for the purposes of the project; B. Design, engineering, architectural, and planning; C. Archaeologicallhistorica] review; 0. Construction management and construction observation (from external sources only); E. Construction costs including, but not limited to, the following: Cly of Rentor Page 3 Contreatianns and Candffi= LG09-951-121 12121 20M 20Q9-2011 Direct-AppmpMfion Gonhat i. Site preparation and improvements; ii. Permits and fees; iii. Labor and materials; iv. Taxes on project goods and services; v. Capitalized equipment; A Information technology infrastructure; and vii. Landscaping. F. Insurance premiums as required in. Section 1.19; G. Other costs authorized through the legislation. 1.9. BILLING PROCEDURES AND PAYMENT The Board shall reimburse the Contractor for eligible project expenditures up to the maximum payable under this Contract. When requesting reirnburserhent for costs incurred orexpenditures made, the Contractor shall submit a signed and completed Invoice Voucher (Form A-1 9), referencing the ATTACHMENT l; PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK project activity performed, and any appropriate documentation. The Invoice Voucher must be certified by an official of the Contractor with authority to bind the Contractor. Each Invoice Voucher must be accompanied by a Project Status Report, which describes, in narrative form, the progress made on the project since the last invoice was submitted, as well as a report of project status to date. The Board will not release payment for any reimbursement request received unless and until the Project Status Report is received. After approving the Invoice Voucher and Project Status Report, the Board shall promptly remit a warrant to the Contractor. The final Invoice Voucher payment shall not occur prior to the completion of all project activities as identified in ATTACHMENT I: PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK. A sum not to exceed ten' percent (10%) of the grant amount will be retained until all project activities are complete and a Certified Project Completion Report is completed and submitted by the Contractor, per Section 1.10. The Contractor shall submit all invoice Vouchers and any required documentation to: Contracts Administration Unit Department of Commerce PO Box 42525 Olympia, WA 98504-2525 The Board will pay the Contractor upon acceptance of services provided and receipt of properly completed invoices, which shall be submitted to the Board not more often than monthly. Payment shall be considered timely if made by the Board within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of properly completed invoices. Payment shall be sent to the address designated by the Contractor. The Board may, in its sole discretion, terminate the Contract or withhold payments claimed by the Contractor for services rendered if the Contractor fails to satisfactorily comply with any term or condition of this Contract. No payments in advance or in anticipation of services or supplies to be provided under this Contract shall be made by the Board. GlIty of Rerdon Rage 4 Cam ad Terms and CwMons LG09-951-121 12f21rZM 2009 2011 Dirad-AppmpdaWn contras Duplication of Billed Costs. The Contractor shall not bill the Board for services performed under this Contract, and the Board shall not pay the Contractor, if the Contractor is entitled to payment or has been or will be paid by any other source, including grants, for that service. Disallowed Costs. The Contractor is responsible for any audit exceptions or disallowed costs incurred by its own organization or that of its subcontractors. 1.10. CERTIFIED PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT AND FINAL PAYMENT The Contractor shall complete a Certified Project Completion Report when activities identified in ATTACHMENT 1: (PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK are complete. The Board will supply the Contractor with the Certified Project Completion Report fors upon request. The Contractor shall provide the following information to the Board: A. A certified statement of the actual dollar amounts spent, from all funding sources, in completing the project as described in ATTACHMENT I: PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK, B. A certified statement that the project, as described in ATTACHMENT 1: PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK, is complete and, if applicable, meets required standards. C. Certification that all costs associated with the project have been incurred and accounted for. Costs are incurred when goods and services are received and/or contract work is performed. The Contractor will submitthe Certified Project Completion Report together with the last Invoice Voucher for a sum not to exceed the balance of the grant amount. including the ten percent (10%) retainage, as described in Section 1.9. The final Invoice Voucher payment shall not occur prior to the completion of all project activities identified in ATTACHMENT 1: PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK and the Board's receipt of the Certified Project Completion Report. 1-11- REPORTS The Contractor shall furnish the Board.with Project Status Reports when submitting Invoice Vouchers (as described in Section 1.9), Ouartedy Project Reports at the end of each quarter, a Certified, Project Completion Report at project completion (as described in Section 1-10), and other reports as the Board may require. Failure to file reports as requested may result in termination of this Contract. 1.12. E=VALUATION AND MONfTORING The Contractor shall cooperate with and freely participate in any monitoring or evaluation activities conducted by the Board, including site inspections, if necessary. The Contractor may be asked by the Board to provide photographs, either hard copy or electronically, which visually depict the progress made on the project. The Board or the State Auditor and any of their representatives shall have full access to and the right to examine all of the Contractor's records with respect to all matters covered in this Contract. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts from such records and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, and records of matters covered by this Contract. Such rights last for six (6) years from the date final payment is made hereunder. Clly of Renton Page 5 Con"d Temis aml Conditions LGW-951-121 121212M 20Q9-Ml1 Dist Appropriation Contract 1.13. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT/CAPITAL FACILITIES The Board makes no claire to any real property improved or constructed with funds awarded under this Contract and does not assert and will not acquire any ownership interest in or title to the capital facilities and/or equipment constructed or purchased with state funds under this Contract. This provision does not extend to claims that the Board may bring against the Contractor in recapturing funds expended in violation of this Contract. 1.14. CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP OR USE FOR CONTRACTOR -OWNED PROEi:RTY The Contractor understands and agrees that any or all assets acquired, constructed, or otherwise improved by the Contractor using the funds under this Contract shall be held and used by the .Contractor for the purposes stated.in ATTACHMENT I: PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK for a period of at least ten (10) years from the date the final payment is made. For a period of at least ten (10) years from the date the final payment is made, in the event that the Contractor decides to change or transfer ownership of any or all assets acquired, constructed, or otherwise improved by the Contractor using the funds under this Contract, the Contractor agrees that any such, decision or action must be submitted in writing and approved by the Board in writing at least thirty (30) days prior to the execution of such decision or action. In the event the Contractor is found to be out of compliance with this section, the Contractor shall repay the principal amount of the grant as stated in Section 1.5, plus interest calculated at the rate of interest on State of Washington general obligation bonds issued most closely to the effective date of the legislation in which the subject asset was authorized. Repayment shall be made pursuant to Section t.20. Recapture Provision. 1.15. CHANGE -OF USE FOR LEASED PROPERTY The Contractor understands and agrees that any facility leased by the Contractor that is constructed, renovated, or otherwise improved using state funds under this Contract shall be used by the Contractor for the purposes stated in ATTACHMENT is PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK for a period of at least ten (10) years from the date the final payment is made. In the event the Contractor is found to be out of compliance with this section, the Contractor shall repay the principal amount of the grant as stated in Section 1.5, plus interest calculated at the rate of interest on State of Washington general obligation bonds issued most closely to the effective date of the legislation in which the subject facility was authorized. Repayment shall be made pursuant to Section t ,20. Recapture Provision. 1.16. HISTORICAL ANU CULTURAL ARTIFACTS In the event that historical or cultural artifacts are discovered at the project site during construction, the Contractor shall immediately stop construction and notify the state historical preservation officer. at the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation_ In the event that the Contractor finds it necessary to amend ATTACHMENT 1: PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK, the Contractor may be required to re-oompty with Executive Order 0505. 1.17. SIGNAGE, MARKERS, AND PUBLICATIONS If, during the period covered by this Contract, the Contractor displays or circulates any communication, publication, or donor recognition identifying the financial participants in the project, any such communication or publication must idenbfy'The Taxpayers of Washington State' as a participant. City of Rergon Page 6 Contact Terms and CwxMms LG03451-121 12121/2009 M 2411 Dher2A*mpriatlon Contract 1.10. PREVAILING WAGE LAW The project funded under this Contract is subject to state prevailing wage law (Chapter 39.12 RCW). The Contractor is advised to consult the Industrial Statistician at the Washington Department of Labor and Industries to determine the prevailing wages that must be paid. The Board is not responsible for determining the prevailing wages apptying to this project or for any prevailing wage payments that may be required by law. 1.19. INSURANCE A. Private Organizations The Contractor shall provide insurance coverage as set out in this section. The intent of the required insurance is to protect the State of Washington should there be any claims, suits, actions, costs, damages, or expenses arising from any loss, or negligent or intentional actor omission of the Contractor or its subcontractors, or agents of either, while performing under the terms of this Contract. The insurance required shall be issued by an insurance company authorized to do business within the State of Washington. Except for Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance, the insurance shall name the State of Washington, its agents, officers, and employees as additional insureds under the insurance policy_ All policies shall be primary to any other valid and collectable insurance. The Contractor shall instruct the insurers to give the Board thirty (30) calendar days advance notice of any insurance cancellation or modification. The Contractor shall submit to the Board within fifteen (15) calendar days of the Contract start date, a certificate of insurance, which outlines the coverage and limits required under this insurance section. During the term of the Contract, the Contractor shall submit renewal certificates not less than thirty (30) calendar days prior to expiration of each policy required under this section. The Contractor shall provide insurance coverage that shall be maintained in full force and effect during the term of this Contract, as follows: Commercial General Liabilily Insurance Policy. Provide a Commercial General Liability Insurance Policy, including contractual liability, written on an occurrence basis, in adequate quantity to protect against legal [lability arising out of Contract activity but no less than $1,040,000 per occurrence. Additionally, the Contractor is responsible for ensuring that any. subcontractors provide adequate insurance coverage for the activities arising out of subcontracts. Automobile Liability, In the event that performance pursuant to this Contract involves the use of vehicles, owned or operated by the Contractor or its subcontractors, automobile liability insurance shall be required. The minimum limit for automobile liability is $1,000,000 per occurrence, using a Combined Single Limit for bodily injury and property damage. Professional Liability. Errors, and Omissions Insurance. The Contractor shall maintain Professional liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance. The Contractor shall maintain minimum limits of no less than $1,000,000.por occurrence to cover all activities by the Contractor and licensed staff employed or under Contract to the Contractor. The State of Washington, its agents, officers, and employees need not be named as additional insureds under this policy. Fdel[ty Insurance. Every officer, director, employee, or agent who is authorized to act on behalf of the Contractor for the purpose of receiving or depositing funds into program accounts Cky of Renton PagaT ConfradTe;ms and Cords m LG09-951-121 1212112009 2009--M 1 Dred-Appn piabon Car0act or issuing financial documents, checks, or other instruments of payment for program costs shall be insured to provide protection against loss: The amount of fidelity coverage secured pursuant to this Contract shall be $100,004 or the highest of planned reimbursement for the Contract period, whichever is lowest. Fidelity insurance secured pursuant to this paragraph shall name the Contractor as beneffaary. Subcontractors that receive $10,400 or more per year in funding through this Contract shall secure fidelity insurance as noted above. Fidelity insurance secured by subebntractors pursuant to this paragraph shall name the Contractor as beneficiary. The Contractor shall provide, at the Board's request, copies of insurance instruments or certifications from the insurance issuing agency. The copies or certifications shall show the insurance coverage, the designated beneficiary, who is covered, the amounts, the period of coverage, and that the Board will be provided thirty (30) days advance written notice of cancellation, B. Self -Insured Contractors With prior approval from the Board, the Contractor may provide insurance coverage under a self-insuraclAability pool or self-insured risk management program. In order to obtain permission from the Board, the Contractor shall provide: a description of its self-insurance program, and ii. a certificate and/or letter of coverage that outlines coverage, limits, and deductibles. All self-insured risk management programs or self-insured/liability pool financial reports must comply with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and adhere to accounting standards promulgated by: Governmental AccouMing Standards Board (GASB), ii. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), and iii_ The Washington State Auditor's annual instructions for financial reporting. Contractors participating in joint risk pools shall maintain sufficient documentation to support the aggregate claim liability information reported on the balance sheet. The State of Washington, its agents, and employees need not be named as additional insured under a self- insured property/liability pool, if the pool is prohibited from naming third parties as additional insured.' Contractor shall provide annually to the Board a summary of coverages and a letter of self- insurance, evidencing continued coverage under Contractor's self- insuredAiahility pool or self- insured risk management program. Such annual summary of coverage and letter of self- insurance will be provided on the anniversary of the start date of this Contract. Emolovers Liability [`Stop Gap' Insurance. In addition, the Contractor shall buy employers liability insurance and, if necessary, commercial umbrella liability insurance with limits not less than $1,004,000 each accident for bodily injury by accident of $1,D00,444 each employee for bodily injury or disease. City of Renton Page B Contr 17&vn aid Con fiws' LG09-951-121 12121rM 2009,2091 DiiW*ppRmpnatlon Contract Excess Coverage. By requiring insurance herein, the Board does not represent that coverage and limits will be adequate to protect Contractor and such coverage and limits shall not limit Contractor's liability under the indemnities and reimbursements granted to the Board in this Contract. Unemployment and Industrial Insurance. The Contractor shall be in full compliance with all state unemployment and industrial insurance laws while performing work under this contract. The Board will not be responsible for payment of industrial insurance premiums or for any other claim or benefit for the Contractor, or any subcontractor or employee of the Contractor, which might arise under the industrial insurance laws during performance of this contract. ProterAgn of Project Pro a Contractors Assum tion of Risk. The Contractor shall continuously maintain adequate protection of all the project work from damage and shall protect the property from injury or loss arising in connection with this Contract_ The entire work of the Contractor shall be at the sole risk of the Contractor. The Contractor may elect to secure fire, extended coverage, and vandalism insurance or all-risk insurance to cover the project work during the course of construction_ The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions for the safety of employees working on the project, and shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local safety laws and building codes to prevent accidents or injuries to persons, on, about, or adjacent to the premises where the work is being performed. 120. RECAPTURE PROVISION In the event that the Contractor fails to expend state funds in accordance with state law and/or the provisions of this Contract, the Board reserves the right to recapture state funds in an amount equivalent to the extent of noncompliance. Repayment by the Contractor of state funds under this recapture provision shall occur within thirty (30) days of demand. In the event that the Board is required to institute proceedings to enforce this recapture provision, the Board shall be entitled to its cost thereof, including reasonable attorney's fees. 121. REDUCTION IN FUNDS In the event state funds appropriated for the work contemplated under this Contract are withdrawn, reduced, or limited in any way by the Washington State Governor or Legislature during the Contract period, the parties hereto shall be bound by any such revised'funding limitations as implemented at the discretion of the Board, and shall meet and renegotiate the Contract accordingly. 122. REAPPROPRIATION The parties hereto understand and agree that any state funds not expended by June 30, 2011, including the ten percent (10%) retainage as described in Section 1.8, will lapse on that date unless specifically reappropriated by the Washington State Legislature or Governor. The Board will make all necessary efforts to seek reappropriation of funds into the 2011-2013 triennium. it funds are so reappropriated, the Board's obligation under the terms of this Contract shall be contingent upon the terms of such reappropriation. CO of Rennin Page 9 Cm W Terms and Conditions L509-951-121 1 Z212ON . 2009-2011 DiactAppgaria6on Contract Part 2. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 2.1_ DEFINITIONS As used throughout this Contract, the following terms shall have the meaning set forth below: A- 'Authorized Representative' shall mean the Public Works Board Chair and/or the designee authorized in writing to act on the Chair's behalf. B. 'Contractor` shall mean the entity identified on the face sheet performing service(s) under this Contract, and shall include all employees and agents of the Contractor. C. 'The Board' shall mean the Washington State Public Works Board created in Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.155.030, and who is a Party to the Contract. D. 'Personal Information' shall mean information identifiable to any person, including, but not limited to, information that relates to a person's name, health, finances, education, business, use or receipt of governmental services or other activities, addresses, telephone numbers, social security numbers, driver license numbers, other identifying numbers, and any financial identifiers. E. 'State' shall mean the state of Washington. F. "Subcontractor" shall mean one not in the employment of the Contractor, who is performing all or part of those services under this Contract under a separate contract with the Contractor. The terms 'subcontractor' and'subcordractors' mean subcontractor(s) in any tier. 22. ALLOWABLE= COSTS Costs allowable under this Contract are actual expenditures according to an approved budget up to the maximum amount stated on the Contract Award or Amendment Face Sheet. 2.3. ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 2.4. AMENDMENTS This Contract may be amended by mutual agreement of the parties. Such amendments shall not be binding unless they are in writing and signed by personnel authorized to bind each of the parties_ 2.5. AMERI ANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT MAJ OF 1990 PIJBUC LAW 101-336 ALSO REFERRED TO AS THE "ADX'20 CFR PART 35 The Contractor must comply with the ADA, which provides comprehensive oMi rights protection to individuals with disabilities in the areas of employment, public accommodations, state and local government services, and telecommunications. 2.6. APPROVAL This contract shall be subject to the written approval of the Board's Authorized Representative and shall not be Finding until so approved. The contract maybe altered, amended, or waived only by a written amendment executed by both parties. 2.7. ASSIGNMENT Neither this Contract, nor any claim arising under this Contract, shall be transferred or assigned by the Contractor without prior written consent of the Board. C!y of Renbn Fape 10 Contract Toms and Cans LG09-4451-121 2ffD9 al l DiTd-Appnypria6Contract 2.8. ATTORNEYS' FEES Unless expressly permitted under another provision of the Contract, in the event of litigation or other action brought to enforce Contract terms, each party agrees to bear its own attomeys fees and costs. 2.9. AUDIT A. General Requirements Contractors are to procure audit services based on the following guidelines. The Contractor shall maintain Its records and accounts so as to facilitate the audit requirement and shall ensure that Subcontractors aisa maintain auditable records. The Contractor is responsible for any audit exceptions incurred by its own organization -or that of its Subcontractors. The Board reserves the right to recover from the Contractor all disallowed costs resulting from the audit As applicable, Contractors required to have an audit must ensure the audits are performed in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS); Govemmeat Auditing Standards (the Revised Yellow Book) developed by the Comptroller General. Responses to any unresolved management findings and disallowed or questioned costs shall be included with the audit report. The Contractor must respond to the Hoard requests for information or corrective action concerning audit issues within thirty (30) days of the date of request" B. State Funds Requirements Contractors expending $100,000 or more in total state funds in a fiscal year must have a financial audit as defined by Government Auditing Standards (rhe Revised Yellow Book) and according to Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GRAS). The Schedule of State Financial Assistance must be included. The schedule includes: Contractor agency name State program name BARS account number Contractor Agency contract number Contract award amount including amendments (total grant award) Beginning balance Current year revenues Current year expenditures Ending balance Program total If the Contractor is a state or local government entity, the Office of the State Auditor shall conduct the audit Audits of non-profit organizations are to be conducted by a certified public accountant selected by the Contractor. The Contractor shall include the above audit requirements in any subcontracts. In any case, the Contractor's financial records must be available for review by the Board, City of Rent2n Page 11 Garmmft Terms and Cmd&m LG09951-121 127212009 2009.2011 Dked,AppmpdaOw Contract C. Documentation Requirements The Contractor must send a copy of any required audit Reporting Package as described in OMB Circular A-133, Part C, Section 320(c) no later than nine (9) months after the end of the Contractor's fiscal year(s) to: Department of Commerce ATTN: Audit Review and Resolution office 906 Columbia Street SW, Fifth Floor PO Box 483DO Olympia WA 98504-8300 In addition to sending a copy of the audit, when applicable, the Contractor must include: 40 Corrective action pian for audit findings within three (3) months of the audit being received by the Board. • Copy of the Management Letter. 2.10. CODE REQUIREMENTS All construction and rehabilitation projects must satisfy the requirements of applicable local, state, and federal building, mechanical, plumbing, fire, energy and barrier -free codes. Compliance with the Americans with DL5abili'tles Act of 1990 28 C.F.R. Part 35 will be required, as specified by the local building Department. 2.11. CONFIDENTIAUTYISAFEGUARDING OF INFORMATION A. "Confidential Information' as used in this section includes: a. All material provided to the Contractor by the Hoard that is designated as 'confidential, by the Board; b. Al l material produced by the Contractor that is designated as 'confidential" by the Board; and c. All personal information in the possession of the Contractor that may not be disclosed understate or federal law. "Personal information' includes but is not limited to information related to a person's name, health, finances, education, business, use of government services, addresses, telephone numbers, social security number, driver's license number and other Identifying numbers, -and "Protected Health Information" under the federal Heatth Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). B. The Contractor shall comply with all state and federal laws related to the use, sharing, transfer, sale, or disclosure of Confidential Information. The Contractor shall use Confidential Information solely for the purposes of this Contract and shall not use, share, transfer, sell or disclose any Confidential Information to any third party except with the prior written consent of the Board or as may be required by law. The Contractor shall take all necessary steps to assure that Confidential information is safeguarded to prevent unauthorized use, sharing, transfer, sale or disclosure of Confidential Information or violation of any state or federal laws related thereto. Upon request, the Contractor shall provide the Board with its policies and procedures on oonfidentiality. The Board may require changes to such policies and procedures as they apply to this Contract whenever the Board reasonably determines that changes are necessary to prevent unauthorized disclosures. The Contractor shall make the changes within the time period specified by the Board. Upon request, the Contractor shall immediately return to the Board any Confidential Intormation that the Board reasonably determines has not been adequately protected by the Contractor against unauthorized disclosure. C. Unauthorized Use or Disclosure. The Contractor shall notify the Board within five (5) working days of any unauthorized use or disclosure of any confidential information, and shall take necessary steps to mitigate the harmful effects of such use or disclosure. Cir of Renton Page 12 Conhad Terms and Conx6ons LG09-851-121 1?J21rZM 2DD9-2011 Nett-Approph-,&n Contact 2.12. CONFORMANCE If any provision of this Contract violates any statute or rule of law of the state of Washington, it is considered modified to conform to that statute or rule of law. 2.13. COPYRIGHT PROVISIONS Unless otherwise provided, all Materials produced under this Contract shall be considered 'works for hire' as defined by the U.S. Copyright Act and shall be owned by the Hoard. The Board shall be considered the author of such Materials. In the event the Materials are not considered 'works for hire" under the U.S. Copyright laws, the Contractor hereby irrevocably assigns all right, title, and interest in all Materials, including all intellectual property rights, moral rights, and rights of publicity to the Board effective from the moment of creation of such Materials. 'Materials' means all items in any format and includes, but is not limited to, data, reports, documents, pamphlets, advertisements, books, magazines, surveys, studies, computer programs, films, tapes, and/or sound reproductions. 'Ownership' includes the right to copyright, patent, register and the ability to transfer these rights. For Materials that are delivered under the Contract, but that incorporate pre-existing materials not produced under the Contract, the Contractor hereby grants to the Board a nonexclusive, royalty - free, irrevocable license (with rights to sublicense to others) in such Materials to translate, reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works, publicly perform, and publicly display. The Contractor warrants and represents that the Contractor has all rights and permissions, including intellectual property rights, moral rights and rights of publicity, necessary to grant such a license to the Board. The Contractor shall exert all reasonable effort to advise the Board, at the time of delivery of Materials furnished under this Contract, of all known or potential invasions of privacy contained therein and of any portion of such document which was not produced in the performance of this Contract. The Contractor shall provide the Board with prompt written notice of each notice or claim of infringement received by the Contractor with respect to any Materials delivered under this Contract. The Board shall have the right to modify or remove any restrictive markings placed upon the Materials by the Contractor, 2.14. DISALLOWED COSTS The Contractor is responsible for any audit exceptions or disallowed costs incurred by its own organization or that of its Subcontractors. 2.15. DISPUTES Except as otherwise provided in this Contract, when a dispute arises between the parties and it cannot be resolved by direct negotiation, either party may request a dispute hearing with the Chair of the Board, who may designate a neutral person to decide the dispute. The request for a dispute hearing must: • be in writing; • state the disputed issues; state the relative positions of the parties; • state the Contractor's name, address, and Contract number; and * be mailed to the Chair and the other party's (respondent's) Representative within three (3) working days after the parties agree that they cannot resolve the dispute. The respondent shall send a written answer to the requester's statement to both the Chair or the Chair's designee and the requestor within five (5) working days. City Df Ratan Pane 13 Canto Tom aW Con Akm LGM -951-121 - 12Q2 Qo0g 2DD9-2011 Duct-Approplabm Centrad The Chair or designee shall review the written statements and reply in writing to both parties within ten (1 D) working days. The Chair or designee may extend this period if necessary by notifying the parties. The decision shall not be admissible in any succeeding judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding. The parties agree that this dispute process shall precede any action in a judicial or quasi-judicial tribunal_ Nothing in this Contract shall be construed to limit the parties' choice of a mutually acceptable alternate dispute resolution (ADR) method in addition to the dispute hearing procedure outlined above. 2.16. DUPLICATE PAYMENT The Contractor certifies that work to be performed under this contract does not duplicate any work to be charged against any other contract, subcontract, or other source. 2.17. ETHIMCQNFL.ICTS OF INTEREST In performing under this Contract, the Contractor shall assure compliance with the Ethics in Public Service Act (Chapter 42.52 RCW) and any other applicable state or federal law related to ethics or conflicts of interest. 2.18. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE This Contract shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the state of Washington, and the venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in the Superior Court for Thurston County. 2.19. INDEMNIFICATION To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the state of Washington, the Board, all other agencies of the state and all officers, agents and employees of the state, from and against all claims or damages for injuries to persons or property or death arising out of or incident to the Contractors performance or failure to perform the Contract. The Contractor's obligation to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless includes any claim by the Contractor's agents, employees, representatives, or any Subcontractor or its agents, employees, or representatives.. The Contractor's obligation to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless shall not be eliminated by any actual or alleged concurrent negligence of the state or its agents, agencies, employees and officers. Subcontracts shall include a comprehensive indemnification clause holding harmless the Contractor, the Board, the state of Washington, its officers, employees and authorized agents. The Contractor waives its immunity under Title 51 RCW to the extent it is required to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the state and its agencies, officers, agents or employees_ 220. INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF THE CONTRACTOR The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this Contract. The Contractor and its employees or agents performing under this Contract are not employees or agents of the state of Washington or the Board. The Contractor will not hold itself out as or claim to be an officer or employee of the Board or of the state of Washington by reason hereof, nor will the Contractor make any claim of right, privilege or benefit which would accrue to such officer or employee under law. Conduct and control of the work will be solely with the Contractor. city of Renton Page 14 G3*wt Terms and CoWftm LGO"51-121 1221 r 2004-2011 boect-Appropdar5on Contacx 2.21. INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE COVERAGE The Contractor shall comply with all applicable provisions of Title 51 RCW, Industrial Insurance. If the Contractor fails to provide industrial insurance coverage or fails to pay premiums or penalties on behalf of its employees as may be required by law, the Board may collect from the Contractor the full amount payable to the Industrial Insurance Accident Fund. The Board may deduct the amount owed by the Contractor to the accident fund from the amount payable to the Contractor by the Board under this Contract, and transmit the deducted amount to the Department of Labor and Industries, (11-81) Division of Insurance Services. This provision does not waive any of L&I's rights to collect from the Contractor. 222. LAWS The Contractor shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes, regulations and policies of local and state and federal governments, as now or hereafter amended including, but not limited to: Washington State Laws and Regulations Affirmative action, RCW 41.06,020 (11). Boards of directors or officers of non-profit corporations -- Liability - Limitations, RCW 4.24.264. Disclosure -campaign finances -lobbying, Chapter 42,17 RCW. Discrimination -human rights commission, Chapter 49.60 RCW. Ethics in public service, Chapter 42.52 RCW.- Housing assistance program, Chapter 43.185 RCW lnterlocal cooperation act, Chapter 39.34 RCW. Noise control, Chapter 70.107 RCW_ Office of minority and women's business enterprises, Chapter 39.19 RCW and Chapter 326-02 WAC. Open public meetings act, Chapter 42.30 RCW. Prevailing wages on public works, Chapter 39.12 RCW, Public records act, Chapter 42.56 RCW; Relocation assistance - real property acquisition policy, Chapter 8.26 RCW. Shoreline management act of 1971, Chapter 90.5$ RCW. State budgeting, accounting, and reporting system, Chapter 43.88 RCW_ State building code, Chapter 19-27 RCW and Energy-related building standards, Chapter 19.27A RCW, and Provisions in buildings for aged and handicapped persons, Chapter 70.92 RCW. State Coastal Zone Management Program, Publication 01-06-003, Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program, Washington State Department of Ecology. State environmental policy, Chapter 43.21 C RCW. State Executive Order 05-05 Archeological and Cu Mural Resources. 223. LICENSING, ACCREDITATION AND REGISTRATION The Contractor shall comply with all applicable local, state, and federal licensing, accreditation and registration requirements or standards necessary for the performance of this Contract. 224. UMITATION OF AUTHORITY Only the Authorized Representative or Authorized Representative's designee by writing (designation to be made prior to action) shall have the express, implied, or apparent authority to after, amend, modify, or waive any clause or condition of this Contract 2.25. LOCAL_ PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION COORDINATION Where applicable, Contractor shall participate in local public transportation forums and implement strategies designed to ensure access to services. City of Regan Page 15 contact TUTM and Conditm LM -951-121 1211110009 2DW2011 NnoM-AppmKatiDn Contract 2.26. NONCOMPLIANCE WITH NONDISCRIMINATION LAWS During the performance of this Contract, the Contractor shall comply with all federal, state, and local nondiscrimination laws, regulations and policies. In the event of the Contractor's non- compliance or refusal to comply with any nondiscrimination law, regulation or policy, this contract may be rescinded, canceled or terminated in whole or in part, and the Contractor maybe declared ineligible for further contracts with the Board. The Contractor shall, however, be given"a reasonable time in which to cure this noncompliance. Any dispute may be resolved in accordance with the 'Disputes" procedure set forth herein. 2.27. POLITICAL ArTTMTIES Political activity of Contractor employees and officers are limited by the State Campaign Finances and Lobbying provisions of Chapter 42.17 RCW and the Federal Hatch Act, 5 USC 1501 - 1508. No funds may be used for working for or against ballot measures or for or against the candidaFy of any person for public office. 2.28, PREVAILING WAGE LAW The Contractor certifies that all contractors and subcontractors performing work on the Project shall comply with state Prevailing Wages on Public Works, Chapter 39.12 RCW, as applicable to the Project funded by this contract, including but not limited to the filing of the "Statement of Intent to Pay Prevailing Wages' and "Affidavit of Wages Paid' as required by RCW 39.12.040. The Contractor shall malntain records sufficient to evidence compliance withChapter 39.12 RCW, and shall make such records available for the Board's review upon request. 229. PROHIBITION AGAINST PAYMENT OF BONUS OR COMMISSION The funds provided under this Contract shall not be used in payment of any bonus or commission for the purpose of obtaining approval of the application for such funds or any other approval or concurrence under this Contract provided, however, that reasonable fees or Mona fide technical consultant, managerial, or other such services, other than actual solicitation, are not hereby prohibited if otherwise eligible as project costs. 2.30. PUBLICITY The Contractor agrees not to publish or use any advertising or publicity materials in which the state of Washington or the Board's name is mentioned, or language used from which the connection with the state of Washington's or the Board's name may reasonably be inferred or implied, without the prior written consent of the Board_ 2.31. RECAPTURE In the event that the Contractor fails to perform this contract in accordance with state laws, federal laws, andlor the provisions of this contract, the Board reserves the right to recapture funds in an amount to compensate the Board for the noncompliance in addition to any other remedies available at law or in equity. Repayment bj the Contractor of funds under anis recapture provision shall occur within the time period specified by the Board. In the alternative, the Board may recapture such funds from payments due under this contract. 2.32. RECORDS MAINTENANCE The Contractor shall mairdain all books, records, documents, data and other evidence relating to this Contract and performance of the services described herein, including but not limited to accounting procedures and practices which sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect City of Rsnbon Page 1$ Contrail Tieing and Cordiyom LGOS-951-121 12I212M) Mug -a11 Direa,4pMpriatm Cmttad costs of any nature expended in the performance of this Contract. Contractor shall retain such records for a period of six years following the date of final payment. If any litigation, claim or audit is started before the expiration of the six (6) year period, the records shall be retained until all litigation, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been finally resolved. 2.33. REGISTRATION. WrTH DEPARTMENT OF REVENUir .It required by law, the Contractor shall complete registration with the Washington Stata Department of Revenue. 2,34. RIGHT OF INSPECTION At no additional cost to the Board, all records relating to the Contractor's performance under this Contract shall be subject at all reasonable times to inspection, review, and audit by the Board, the Office of the State Auditor, and. federal and state officials so authorized by law, in order to monitor and evaluate performance, compliance, and quality assurance under this Contract. The Contractor shall provide access to its facilities for this purpose. 2.35. SAVINGS In the event funding from state, federal, or other sources is withdrawn, reduced, or limited in any way after the effective date of this Contract and prior to normal completion, the Board may terminate the Contract under the "Termination for Convenience" clause, without the ten business day notice requirement. In lieu of termination, the Contract may be amended to reflect the new funding limitations and conditions. 2.36. SEVERABUTY If any provision of this Contract or any provision of any document incorporated by reference shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this Contract that can be given effect without the invalid provision, if such remainder conforms to the requirements of law and the fundamental purpose of this Contract and to this end the provisions of this Contract are declared to be severable. 2.37. SUBCONTRACTING The Contractor may only subcontract work contemplated under this Contract if it obtains the prior written approval of the Board. If the Board approves subcontracting, the Contractor shall maintain written procedures related to subcontracting, as well as copies of all subcontracts and records related to subcontracts. For cause, the Board in writing may: (a) require the Contractor to amend its subcontracting procedures as they relate to this Contract; (b) prohibit the Contractor from subcontracting with a particular person or entity, or (c) require the Contractor to rescind or amend a subcontract. Every subcontract shall bind the Subcontractor to follow all appl icable terms of this Contract. The Contractor is responsible to the Board if the Subcontractor fails to comply with any applicable term or condition of this Contract: The Contractor shall appropriately monitor the activities of the Subcontractor to assure fiscal conditions of this Contract In no event shall the existence of a subcontract operate to release or reduce the liability of the Contractor to the Board for any breach in the performance of the Contractor's duties. Every subcontract shall include a -term that the Board and the State of Washington are not liable for - claims or damages arising from a Subcontractor's performance of the subcontract. City of Renton Page 17 — — Gorftd Terris and Condi9aa W09;151-121 17121120!19 M-2011 OvedAppmpdafion Gorkaa 2.38. SURVIVAL The terms, conditions, and warranties contained in this Contract that by their sense and context are intended to survive the completion of the performance, cancellation or termination of this Contract shall so survive. 2.39. TAXES All payments accrued on account of payroll taxes, unemployment contributions, the Contractor's income or gross receipts, any other taxes, insurance or expenses for the Contractor or its staff shall be the sole responsibility of the Contractor. 2.40. TERMINATION FOR _CAUSE I SUSPENSION In event the Board determines that the Contractor failed to comply with any term or condition of this Contract, the Hoard may terminate the Contract in whole or in part upon written notice to the Contractor. Such termination shall be deemed "for cause.' Termination shall take effect on the date specified in the notice. In the alternative, the Board upon written notice may allow the Contractor a specific period of time in which to correct the non-compliance. During the corrective -action time period, the Board may suspend further payment to the Contractor in whole or in part, or may restrict the Contractor's right to perform duties under this Contract f=ailure by the Contractor to take timely corrective action shall allow the Board to terminate the Contract upon written notice to the Contractor. 'Termination for Cause' shall be deemed a'Termination for Convenience' when the Board determines that the Contractor did not fail to comply with the terms of the Contract or when the Board determines the failure was not caused by the Contractor's actions or negligence. If the Contract is terminated for cause, the Contractor shall be liable for damages as authorized by law, including, but not limited to, any cost difference between the original contract and the replacement contract, as well as all costs associated with entering into the replacement contract (i.e., competitive bidding, mailing, advertising, and staff time). 2.41, TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE Except as otherwise provided in this Contract the Board may, by ten (1 D) business days written notice, beginning on the second day after the mailing, terminate this Contract, in whole or in pare If this Contract is so terminated, the Board shall be liable only for payment required under the terms of this Contract for services rendered or goods delivered prior to the effective date of termination_ 2.42. TERMINATION PROCEDURES After receipt of a notice of termination, except as otherwise directed by the Board, the Contractor shall: A. Stop work under the Contract on the date, and to the extent specified, in the notice-, B. Place no further orders or subcontracts for materials, services, or facilities related to the Contract; C. Assign to the State all of the rights, title, and interest of the Contractor under the orders and subcontracts so terminated, in which case the Board has the right, at Its discretion, to settle or pay any or aJl claims arising out of the termination of such orders and subcontracts. Any attempt by the Contractor to settle such claims must have the prior written approval of the Board; and D. Preserve and transfer any materials, contract deliverables and/or the Board property in the Contractor's possession as directed by the Board. city of Rergbn Paga 1 B Cantron Terms and Gondiborm LCMJ-951-121 1Z121fM 2009.Ml1 Direr-Apprnprldw Conhad Upon termination of the Contract, the Board shall pay the Contractor for any service provided by the Contractor under the Contract prior to the date of termination. The Board may withhold any amount due as the Board reasonably determines is necessary to protect the Board against potential loss or liability resulting from the termination. The Board shall pay any withheld amount to the Contractor if the Board later determines that loss or liability will not occur. The rights and remedies of the Board under this section are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided under this Contract or otherwise provided under law. 2.43. WAIVER Waiver of any default or breach shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default or breach_ Any waiver shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Contract unless stated to be such in writing and signed by Authorized Representative of the Board. ,cIty of Renbn Page 19 GOntracl Terms and GwdWns LGOSS-951-121 tP12112009 2W9-2011 Mract -AppragisSan Conhaci ATTACHMENT I: PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK PUBLIC WORKS BOARD 2009-2011 GRANT PROGRAMS---DIRECT-APPROPRIATION PROJECTS Contractor: City of Renton Contract Number: LG09-951-121 Project,Title: Renton Hawk's Landing The projects scope of work is comprised c f the following activities: $form Drainage system: The purpose of the public storm drainage system upgrade along Lake Washington Blvd, near the NE 44th Street Exit 7 on Interstate -405 Is to improve surface water facilities improvements along public portions of take Washington Blvd. fronting the first phase of the Hawks Landing project that discharges into May Creek, a Class 1 salmon bearing stream_ The storm and sidewalk system proposed shall Include design and construction of approximately 240 feet of porous concrete sidewalk, curbing and catch basins south of the first phase of the Hawk's Landing project. In addition, approximately 1,000 feet of storm trunk -main, relocation of overhead power, installation of a water quality treatment facility for treating public runoff would be constructed, as well as the Hawks Landing frontage catch basins. Anticipated projectlasks Include surveying, geo-technical investigations, a wetlands and habitat analysis, utility potholing, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, permitting, preliminary design, final design plans, specifications, preparation of contract documents, bidding, construction and construction inspections. The following Is the expected schedule: • Submit consultant scope of work for Council approval by end of October 2009. • Produce plans, specifications, and bid doduments with permits by end of March 2010, • Award bid by end of April 2010. • Start constiXtlon by early June 2010. • Complete construction by end of October 2010. The storm drainage system will be designed and constructed in conjunction with the proposed waterline design and construction. Water Line Extension_ The purpose of the extension of about 1,250 feet of 124nch diameter C€ty-owned. water line is to provide sufficient water capacity for fire protection to properties in the vicinity of the Exit 7 Area, including the Hawk's Landing project. There is currently no water line within this portion of lake Washington Blvd. The new water line will connect to an existing 12 - inch City water line, which ends south of the May Creek bridge and about 620 feet south of the Hawles Landing project Anticipated project tasks Include permitting, surveying, preliminary design, final design, preparation of contract documents, permitting, bidding, construction, construction inspection and coordination with other public, franchise, and private utilities for relocation. The expected schedule for the design and construction of the water line is the same as the schedule for the storm drainage Improvement project and is as follows: • Submit consultant scope of work for Council approval by end of October 2009. • Produce plans, specfficat€ons, and bid documents with permits by end of March 2010. • Award bid by and of April 2010. • Start constriction by early June 2010. • Complete construction by end of October 2010. Qy of RmW Page 20 Atadrxne k Pmjed Scope of Work LG09-951-121 17J21r2m =9-2017 pirew-Apprppriation Cmtzd May Creek Trail Connector. Property acquisition to Include title reports, appraisals, environmental assessment(s), cultural and historical resources review, survey, lot line adjustment, legal and recording fees. Construction to Include design, environmental processes, mitigation and permitting. The estimated start date Is August 2009 and the estimated completion date is ,tune 2011. If the above scope of work includes engineering, planning, or design activities, the Contractor shall make all plans and documents funded in whole or in part by this Contract available for the Board's review upon reasonable request. The project will be considered complete when all the activities identified in the above scope of work are complete. Additionally, the project performance measures listed below must be accomplished by June 2011. Linear feet of pipe installed (anticipated approximately 1,250 feet). Compared to current data, the improvements to Me public storm drainage system along Lake Washington Blvd North will reduce flooding and improve storm drainage capacity for the existing roadway by 15% and Improve storm water quality treatment on Lake Washington Blvd. North project area, which discharges directly Into May Creek, by 80%. Estimated completion . date: October 2010. Linear feet of water line pipe installed. The Installation of approximately 1,450 linear feet of 12 -Inch water line along Lake Washington Blvd. will provide adequate and neded water capacity for fire protection of public and private properties along the Exit 7 corridor. The new water line will also increase the reliability and redundancy of the City's water supply since it will provide a looped system and eliminates an dead-end system. Performance measures for the installation and completion of the water line extension are: 1. The fire flow capacity of the City's water system will Increase from the current 2,1300 gallon per minute to 5,6100 gallons per minute after completion of the water line extension. 2. The reliability and the redundancy of the water supply to the Exit 7 area will double, a 100% increase, since the system will then have a two-way feed instead of the current a single feed. Estimated completion date: October 2010. Linear feet of trait developed for May Creek Trail connection (estimated approximately . 1,000 feet). Estimated completion date. June 2011. The Contractor, by its signature below, certifies that the projects scope of work and performance measures set forth above have been reviewed and approved by the Contractor's governing body as of the dyear written below. ate d 51GNATURE " Denis Law NAME Mayor TITLE 1.Zd' f0 DATE Attest. �d WQ- Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk Cly of ReFAM rage 21 At dwmnt L Project Stype or Wmi LG09-351-125 1212 MD9 2009-2011 Dked-Apprap6afim Contract ATTACHMENT II: CERTIFICATION OF THE AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT PUBLIC WORKS BOARD 2009-2011 GRANT PROGRAMS—DIRECT-APPROPRIATION PROJECTS Contractor: City of Renton Contract Number: LG09-959-121 This Direct -Appropriation Washington State Public Works Board $1,700,Oo0.OQ Grant Grant#1 $0. c0 Grant #2 Loan #1 $0.00 Grant #3 $0.00 $0.00 i Total Grants - ...K �N k it -.T _.'ti _�'T.1+��:..4.•4i. .. .-:T �� ..F _-''.'.��_. $0.00 1 '....=+5-.r..�1:iti: ". 4�...1;.-:Y'::'i�c'-::..:,;.�_; _ Local Revenue #1 City of Renton Surface Water Utility $100,000.00 Local Revenge #2 Loan #1 $0.00 $0.00 Loan #2 $0.00 $0.00 Loan #3 $100,000.00 $0.00 Total Loans Other Funds #1� $0.00 $0.00 Other Funds #2 Local Revenue #1 City of Renton Surface Water Utility $100,000.00 Local Revenge #2 $0.00 Local Revenue #3. $0.00 Total Local Revenue $100,000.00 W Other Funds #1� $0.00 Other Funds #2 $4.00 Total Other Funds 0 -. x- $0.00 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,800,000.00 The Contractor, by its signature below, certifies that project funding from sources other than those provided by this Contract and identified above has been reviewed and approved by the Contractor's governing body or board of directors, as applicable, and has either been expended for eligible project expenses, or is committed in writing and available and will remain committed and available solely and specifically for carrying out the activities described in ATTACHMENT I: PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK, as of the mate and year written below. The Contractor shall maintain records sufficient to evidence that it has M of Reabn Page 22 Attadv ent IL Avallatx-tlty d Farms CertS6ca0on LGo9W -121 12212009 2009-411 Direda4)WWrwWn Gmnct expondod or has access to the funds needed to complete the activities described in ATTACHMENT L PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK, and shall make such records available for the Board's review upon reasonable request )Ckm, � JV - SIGNATURE Denis Law NAME Mayor TITLE V9"F1,201U DATE Attest: Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk City of Renin Iaege 23 AtKftnwd IL Avaa'lah" of Funds Ca licafim LG09-951-121 12r212009 20Q9-2011 Din a-Appiopda*m Cmtrad ATTACHMENT III: ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS PUBLIC WORKS BOARD 2009-2011 GRANT PROGRAMS—DIRECT-APPROPRIATION PROJECTS Contractor. City of Renton Contract Number: LG09-951-121 .> N � .fir 1.- a,.-,,. •r t -� -.•�- �-- r,. - .,., Engineering Report $0.00 Cultural & Historical Resources Review (Section 106 or EO 05-05) $6,000-00 Environmental Review LandlRight-of-Way Acquisition $5,000.00 $250,000.00 Permits ---- $0.00 Public Involvement/information $D.40 Bid Documents $0.00 Construction $1,200,000.00 Other, Survey $10,000.00 Other: Legal & Real Estate Fees, Title Reports, Appraisals $29,000,00 Other_ Stormwater - design plans, specification, permit costs $240,000.00 Other: Water Line - design engineering, plans, specifications _ $50,000.00 Other; $0.00 , _ $0.00 Qther. TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS $1,8W,000.00 The Contractor, by its signature below, certifies that the Estimated Project Costs set forth above have been reviewed and approved by the Contractor's governing body or board of directors, as applicable, as of the date—and year written elow. -SIGNATURE— Denis IGNA U E Denis Lair Attest: NAME Mayor TfTI E l � � DATE Bonnie I- Walton, City Clerk Cigy of Ream Page 24 Anchrwnt IIC Es rriaW Projad Costs LM -951.111 1 N2IMM 2049-1011 DiW Appy vd3lon Contract ATTACHMENT IV: CERTIFICATION OF THE PAYMENT AND REPORTING OF PREVAILING WAGES PUBLIC WORKS BOARD 2009-2011 GRANT PROGRAMS—DIRECT-APPROPRIATION PROJECTS Contractor: City of Renton Contract Number: LG09-951-121 The Contractor, by its signature below, certfes that all contractors and subcontractors performing work on the project as described in ATTACHMENT I: PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK shall comply with prevailing wage laws set forth in Chapter 39.12 RCW, as applicable to the project funded by this Contract, including but not limited to the filing of the "Statement of Intent to Pay Prevailing Wages" and "Affidavit of Wages Paid" as required by RCW 39.12.040. The Contractor shall maintain records sufficient to evidence compliance with Chapter 39.12 RCW, and shall make such records available for the Board's review upon request If any state funds are used by the Contractor for the purpose of construction, applicable State Prevailing Wages must be paid. The Contractor, by its signature below, certifies that the declaration set forth above has been reviewed and approved by the Contractor's governing body as of the date and year written below. SIGNATURE Denis Law NAME Mayor TITLE 1h -s - O DATE Attest: ^ Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk City of Rarrbn page 25 Atiadvnmt N: Prrndng Wages C LG09-951-121 12121204 M-2011 Dhd-AWMPi35Dn Contract ATTACHMENT V: CERTIFICATION OF THE INTENT TO ENTER THE LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (LEED) CERTIFICATION PROCESS PUBLIC WORKS BOARD 2009-2011 GRANT PROGRAMS—DIRECT-APPROPRIATION PROJECTS Contractor: City of Renton Contract Number: LG09-951-121 The Contractor, by its signature below, certifies that it will enter into the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification process, as stipulated in RCW 39.35D, as applicable to the project described in ATTACHMENT 1: PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK funded by this Contract. The Contractor shall, upon receipt of LEED certification by the United States Green Building Council, provide documentation of such certification to the Board. The Contractor, by its signature below, certifies that the declaration set forth above has been reviewed and approved by the Contractoes governing body or board of directors, as applicable, as of the date and year written below. SIGNATURE Nab APPLICA13LE NAME � � project) .aerr�p TITLE DATE City of Renton Page 25 AttadnneM V: LEED Gwffimfim LCO9951-121 121212" 2009-2011 Dhed,AWoWWw Cwh d 17 Washington State ' r Public Works Board 906 Columbia Street SW Post Office Sox 48319 Olympia, Washingtan 98504-8319 www.pwb.wa.gav 2449-2011 Grant Programs Direct -Appropriation Projects Contract Readiness Survey Project Title: Renton Hawk's Landing Grant Amount: $1,700.,000 Instructions: Before you can receive grant funds, a contract will need to be executed between you (Grantee) and the Public Works Board (Board). Contract development generally takes two to three weeks once you have met our requirements_ Please follow these steps to get the contracting process started: 1. Completely fill out the survey questions by typing your responses in the electronic version of this form; 2_ Have the Grantee Certification (last page) signed by the person authorized to sign contracts for your organization; 3. Attach documentation for committed funds (copies of award letters, council appropriations, etc.), if applicable; 4. Fill out and have the LEER Certification Declaration form (attached) signed by both your architect (if appFcable) and the person authorized to sign contracts; 5. Attach a copy of the project request form/packet that you submitted to legislature; 6. Attach a completed W-9 form (download form at www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/fwg.pdf); 7. Compile and mail these documents to the address above, Attention Corina Grigoras. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Corina Grigoras at (360) 725-3164 or email her at Corina.G6goras@pwb.wa.gov. Thank you for your assistance in making this contract -writing process as quick and easy as possible! SECTION 1. GENERAL INFORMATION City of Renton ® Publicly -Owned ❑ Private Non -Profit Tribal ' d 0� 4 ' 2 jj 8 1,h IAvww. wa- ovlma listing-aspp 4360 Lake Washington Boulevard North, Renton, WA _- 98056-1545 -- _ 1055 S Grady Way, 6t' Floor Renton WA 98057- King 47.0000 -120.8333 83,660 83,650 ��!� 1't District 8' Congressional District F Senator Margarita Prentice, Rep_ Marcie Maxwell Mayor Denis Law WA (425) 430-6591 } - (425) 430-7300 'sdaleesteyQrentonwa.gov ^ • . =r;, Suzanne Dale Estey s Y- a A - WA ;u 20$ 430-6591 r , 206( ) 430-7300 sdaleestey@rentonwa.gov Pub5c Works Board 2008-2011 Grant Programs Page 1 Direct -Appropriation Projects --Contract Readiness Surrey PubW Warks Board 20Q--2011 Grant Programs Page 2 Eiret:t-Apprcpriation Pri jects--Contract Readiness Survey SECTION 2. PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Exit 7 Area Improvements Project/Hawk's landing Mixed Use Development is a proposed redevelopment of approximately 7.8 acres that has for decades been used as industrial land and r warehouse space. Most recently it has been the site of Pan Abode Cedar Homes' manufacturing I facility. The Exit 7 area is a gateway to the City of Renton and the current industrial land use detracts 1 from Renton's vision of high-density, urban development. Additionally, the Hawk's landing development is across the street from Quendall Terminals, a contaminated 23 acre former z: industrial waste clumping grounds where creosote and coal tar were manufactured on the shores of Lake Washington between 1917-1969. This final of three major redevelopment areas at Port Quendall is a federal Environmental Protection Agency Superfund site. It is hoped that the Hawk's Landing development will help.stimulate the clean up and redevelopment of this large waterfront property. The Exit 7 Improvements'area is also adjacent to May Creek, a Class 1 salmon -bearing stream. The State's investment will support environmentally sensitive infrastructure improvements that ... # may not otherwise occur, enhancing the health of the creek by minimizing impacts and creating opportunities for public enjoyment Public benefit of the project. The public will benefit from the continued redevelopment of this area and this significant gateway to Renton. Over 2,500 high wage jobs could be created in the mined use development and increased revenue would be generated that could be reinvested in state services as well as the Renton community for public services such as Police and Parks. The May Creek Trail connection from Lake Washington to Cougar Mountain, a regional trail that will also connect Lake Washington to the Mountain to Sound Greenway system, would also provide tremendous public benefit for the entire region. The state investments in the Exit 7 Area Improvements Project would fund a series of water and stormwater-related infrastructure improvements as well as a regional trail connection that will act as a critical catalyst to make this development more attractive for major office location/relocation decisions: ❑ Extension of City's water line In Lake Washington Boulevard: In order to provide the required fireflow capacity for fire protection to the proposed Exit 7 Area Improvements, including the Hawk's Landing Project, an extension of approximately 1,250 feet of 12 -inch diameter City water main will need to be installed within lake Washington Blvd., since there is currently no water line within this portion of the roadway. This state funding would help pay for the water line extension, at an estimated cost of approximately $540,000 or about $400 per linear foot Construction of additional on-site water mains for the Hawk's Landing project will be privately funded and constructed by the developer to meet code requirements. ❑ Extension of May Creek Trail: State funding would assist with the development of a soft surface trail along May Creek, at the southern boundary of the Hawk's Landing development The May Creek Trail would create a connection from Lake Washington to Cougar Mountain, a regional trail that will also connect Lake Washington to the Mountain to Sound Greenway System_ Approximately 1,000 linear feet of trail could be developed for approximately $300,000, including design, mitigation and permits. Property acquisition is estimated at an additional $600,000 (including tide reports, appraisals, and real estate fees) and may not be fully covered by this grant, so the City will pursue other public intergovernmental and private funding as needed. PIfbfiC Works Board 200&2011 Grant Programs _ Page 3 Direct-Approphadw Projects—C-ortract Realness Survey ❑ Storm drainage system along Lake Washington Boulevard. State funding would assist in the ' construction of � storm system improvements to retrofit Lake Washington Blvd. to provide storm .' 9 i 1 water conveyance and water quality treatment for the existing roadway, as part of the project frontage improvements. This will help to protect water quality, fish habitat in May Creek and `reduce the potential for downstream flooding. The funding would also be used to install porous concrete sidewalks (a low impact development feature), curb and gutter south of the Hawk's Landing Phase 1 development frontage. The public improvements would include construction of approximately 1,000 lineal feet of a storm trunk -line system, a separate catch basin collection system on Lake Washington Blvd., and the construction of a combined flow control (if required) and water quality treatment facility, The Hawk's Landing frontage improvements will be privately funded and constructed for their portions of work including the curb, gutter, dry utilities conduits and sidewalk. Hawk's Landing will discharge runoff to the public system for . Phase 1 and all future phases of the development. The estimated public share of the storm improvements is $700,000. l,:vYBS�tS�!!::..........,3;:�,...x,r:,`RTs.�.Fw .m ht .t s�, .,.,,._yam aw,,,.:_ b : -.n' ,� -.r xw Irl yna r I The first phase of the Hawk's Landing project is a 173 room, five story hotel with full-service restaurant, spa and retail amenities that is privately funded and will be branded to capitalize on its proximity to the Seattle Seahawks' new headquarters and training fatality on Lake Washington. The Seahawks are anticipating completion of the hotel by June 2011 in order to j accommodate their summer training camp, so construction of the hotel is expected to begin in x. = early 2010. This State investment will help serve as a catalyst for the second and future phases of the Hawk's Landing development which might not otherwise occur in the near future, '," includi_pc a hi h-densi , mixed-use retail and rofessional office complex. SITE CONTROL UnU pupirc rFgnt OT way. A portion of the funding will be used to begin acquiring the property for the May Creek Trail connector, for which we do not currently have site control. GOVERNOR EXECUTlV1= ORDER 05-05 (EO 05-05) CULTURAL & HISTORICAL RESOURCES REVIEW (OR SECTION 106) 1 The EO 05-05 requires recipients of state funds to consult with interested parties, i.e_, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, and Indian Tribes, prior to starting project construction. If your project funding includes federal funds, Section 106 (National Historic Preservation Act) will be required, which supersedes the EO 05`05 review, These consultations should take place as early as possible in order to avoid delays in starting your project. If you have questions regarding the cultural and historic resources process, please contact Stephen Dunk at (360) 725-3157 or email him at Sle0hen.Dunk[_owb.wa.vov_ Public Works Board 2009-2411 Grant Programs Page 4 Direct-Appropriab- Prcjed$--Gonlract Readiness Survey LEER (LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN) CERTIFICATION 2 LEED is a certification program run by the U -S. Green Building Council. In 2005 the Washington State Legislature passed a law requiring all capital projects grant recipients to comply with the LEED standards (RCW 39.350), The goal is for major construction or renovation projects receiving slate funds to be built to the LEER silver standard whets "practicable." Projects that fall under certain facility types and projects demonstrating that it would nat `be practicable to meet the LEED silver standard may qualify for a LEED exemption_ Please refer to the attached LEED Ger0cation Declaration form for more details. Public Works Board 2009-2011 Grant Programs Page 5 Direct -Appropriation Projects --Contract Readiness Survey SCOPE OF WORK Now NMI_ 00 r + 0�'Awlzz 0.0 Storm drainage system. The purpose of the public storm drainage system upgrade along Lake Washington Blvd. near the NE 44th Street Exit 7 on Interstate405 is to improve surface water facilities improvements along public portions of Lake Washington Blvd. fronting the 1st phase of the Hawk's Landing project that discharges into May Creek, a Class 1 salmon bearing stream. The storm and sidewalk system proposed shall include design and construction of approximately 240 feet of porous concrete sidewalk, curbing and catch basins south of the first phase of the Hawk's Landing project In addition, approximately 1,000 feet of storm trunk -main, relocation of overhead power, installation of a water quality treabrnent facility for treating public runoff would be constructed as well as the Hawk's Landing frontage catch basins. The design and construction of this project would be coordinated with the private Hawk's Landing project improvements that includes private frontage curbing and sidewalks. Anticipated project tasks include surveying, goo -technical investigations, a wetlands and habitat analysis, utility '1 potholing, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, permitting, preliminary design, final design plans, specifications, preparation of contract documents, bidding, construction and construction !E inspections. If studies from the developer are available then they will be used to assist with design, permitting and construction. The following is the expected schedule. • Submit consultant scope of work for Council approval by end of October 2009. • Produce plans, specifications and bid documents with permits by end of March 2010. • Award bid by end of April 2010. i - Start construction by early June 2010. • Complete construction by end of October 2010. The storm drainage system will be designed and constructed in conjunction with the proposed waterline design and construction. Water line extension. The purpose of the extension of about 1,250 feet of 12 -inch diameter City - owned water line is to provide sufficient water capacity for fire protection to properties in the vicinity of the Exit 7 Area, including the Hawk's Landing project. There is currently no water line within this portion of Lake Washington Blvd. The new water line will connect to an existing 12 - inch City water line which ends south of the May Creek bridge and about 620 feet south of the Hawk's Landing project. The design and construction of the extension of the City water line will be coordinated with the roadway widening and storm drainage improvements that will be constructed by the Hawk's Landing private development and also with the sidewalk and storm improvements that will be funded by the City. Anticipated project tasks include permitting, surveying, preliminary design, final design, preparation of contract documents, permitting, bidding, construction, construction inspection and coordination with other public, franchise, and private utilities for relocation. The expected schedule for the design and construction of the water line is the same as the schedule for the storm drainage improvement project and is as follows: • Submit consultant scope of work for Council approval by end of October 2009. • Produce plans, specifications and bid documents with permits by end of March 2010. • Award bid by end of April 2010. • Start construction by early June 2014. • Complete construction by end of October 2010. May Creek Trail connector. Property acquisition to include title reports, appraisals, environmental assessment(s), cultural and historical resources review, survey, lot line adjustment, legal and recording fees. The estimated start date is August 8, 2009 and the estimated completion date is August 2010. As funding becomes available, design, permitting and construction will occur and include consultant fees for designiconstruction document package preparation, environmental documents, permits, bidding, and on-site construction Direct-Appropri Public Works Board 20D9-2011 Grant Pragrarns Page 6 ation Projects --Contract Readinm Survey management and contractor costs. PROJECT COSTS Environmental Review Land/Right-of-Way Acquisition $5,000 $350,000 Permits Public Involvement/Information Bid Documents Construction Storm $560,000 Water $440,000 Trail $100,000 1! Other. Survey $10,000 Other. Legal $7,000 $5,000 Other-. Me Reports Other Appraisals $7,000 Other Real Estate Fees $10,000 Other Storrnwater - Design plans, specifications, and permit costs Water Line - Design engineering, plans, specifications TOTAL PROJECT COSTS Storm $140,000 Water $60,000 $1,700,000 Public Works Board 2009-2011 Grant Programs Page 7 Direct -Appropriation Pjqoctq--Contract Readiness Survey PROJECT FUNDING Other Grant #2 1 Local Revenue #1 Local Revenue #2- ! Local Revenue #3 — Tr atal Local Revenue �- - � - F .a!�- °'¢.+• 't�4 tJr� �` _=r.� Z J: S k�r�th- f� y`b!_ i'ya F 5+ s=Other #1 a� - Funds Other Funds #2 Total Local Revenue PROJECT PERFORMANCE MEASURES The improvements to the public storm drainage system along Lake Washington Blvd. will reduce flooding, improve storm drainage service for the existing roadway and improve storm water quality treatment that protects May Creek water quality and fish habitat. -.1 The construction of the water line extension will provide the needed water flow capacity and _ improve system reliability for fire protection to properties in the vicinity the Exit 7 Area, including the Hawk's Landing development- -A Linear feet placed in public ownership for May Greek Trail connection. Public Works Hoard 2009-2011 Grant Programs Page a Dired-Appropiatmn Projecla--Centrad Readiness SuNey PROJECT COMPLETION With these funds, and other identified funds, the City will have acquired the property for the ' segment of the May Creek Trail located between Lake Washington Blvd. and 1-405 as part of the regional trail system extending from take Washington to Cougar Mountain Park. As funding is j available, the City will endeavor to complete the construction for this same segment. However it is anticipated that construction will be accomplished in future phases programmed into the City's Six Year Capital Improvement Program. Future phases will include trail design, j environmental processes, permitting and construction. Public Works Baard 2DD3-2011 Grant Programs Page 9 Dimd-Appropnation Projects --Contract Readiness Survey GRANTEE CERTIFICATION The Grantee certifies that: • The information and financial data provided in this document are true and correct to the best of their belief and knowledge and it is understood that Public Works Board staff may independently verify information, and that the discovery of incomplete, false, and/or misleading information is grounds for withholding awarded funds or termination of grant contract; • Records supporting the information provided in this document are on file and will be made available by the Grantee upon request; ■ There are no outstanding liens against this project; • There is currently no litigation in existence seeking to enjoin the commencement or completion of the above-described project; and • The Grantee intends to enter into a grant contract with the Public Works Board, provided that the terms and conditions for a Public Works Board grant are satisfactory to both parties. Signed: .&Ut'�o I- -� Name: D�jLaw Ttle: J Mator RP wfyp Phone Number. Date: Attest: Public Works Board 2U09-201 1 Grant Programs Page 10 i]irect-APProprtation Projeds--Cont ad iZaadiness Survey Eligible Costs Capital Budget funds may generally be used to pay for the following project expenses incurred as far back as May 15, 2009: • design, architectural, and engineering work; ■ building permits/fees; archeologicallhistorical review; ■ construction labor and materials; • demolitionlsite preparation; • capitalized equipment; • information technology infrastructure (cables and wiring); ■ construction management and observation (from external sources only);; • initial furnishings*"; ■ landscaping; • real property when purchased specifically for the project, and associated costs *** Ineligible Costs The following costs are not eligible for reimbursement under this program: • internal administrative activities; ■ project management (from any sources); • fundraising activities; • feasibility studies; • computers or office equipment; ■ rolling stock (such as vehicles); • lease payments for rental of equipment or facilities; mortgages and property -leases (including long-term); • the moving of equipment, furniture, etc., Between facilities. t Construction management �arnd observation, For the purpose of this program, is defined as on-site man emertt� n{l4$w jsion �of the• and erk�rs.tli n_ Construction man ageme tilos rid nctudd work �tyPicaily performed by off consultants or consultant organisations, grllt er! rs prn�?nab rs,nployees of the grantee, unless the employee is hired sdle'and sprfilly to�erfbrtn on-site construction management as defined above. '* Furnishings and equipment are considered eligible project costs as long as the average useful life of the item purchased is 13 years or more. Costs directly associated with property acquisition include appraisal fees, title opinions, surveying fees, real estate fees, title transfer taxes, easements of record, and legal expenses. r , r Y 1 2 3 4 5 5 7 8 9 10 11 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Motion for Summary Judgment November 5, 2010 Without Oral Argument BEFORE THE SHORLINES HEARINGS BOARD IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON In re the appeal of Renton's Shoreline Substantial Development Permit LUA10-041, BCM, SM, Brad Nicholson, V. CITY Of RENTON, Appellant, Respondent. Case NO. SHB#10-016 Declaration of Steve Lee in Support of Renton's Motion for Summary Judgment under CR56 Motion Steve Lee hereby declares under penalty of perjury, pursuant to the laws of the State of Washington that the following is true and correct to the best of my knowledge: 1. That I am over 18 years of age and am competent to testify in this matter. Declaration in Support — Page 1 Renton Ckty Attorney j + 100SeSt ♦ PO Sox 625 ,i Renton, WA 98057-0626 Phone: 425.255.8678 ,). NFVQ Fax: 425.2.56.5474 l 1 � 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2. 1 am a Civil Engineer, P.E., for Respondent, City of Renton, (hereinafter "Renton") I in the above -referenced action. Since 2005, my responsibilities have included, but are not limited to, planning, designs and responses for surface water, CIPS (Capital Improvement Projects), NPDES, Cedar River issues, and flooding. I was the project manager for the Ripley Lane North Storm System Improvement Project that is located adjacent to the Seahawks Training Facility. 3. 1 attended and graduated from University of Pennsylvania and Lehigh University in 1994, with a combined degree in civil engineering. 4. 1 attended and graduated from Lehigh University in 1996 with a Masters in Hydraulics & Hydrology. 5. 1 have worked as a civil engineer since 1994 in a variety of positions for several employers. This prior experience included, but was not limited to, groundwater engineering design support, remediation technologies, PLC programming, brownfieid permitting, construction engineering, surface water drainage issues, permitting dams, water cleanup, NPDES, hydrological and hydraulic modeling, and civil engineering designs. 6. Attached hereto as exhibits are true and correct copies of the following: a. Lake Wa. Blvd. Hawk's Landing Storm and Water Improvements Project, Figure 1 Vicinity Map by Gray & Osbourne, Inc., (hereinafter "Exhibit A"); b. Wetiand/Stream Study. Hawk's Landing Crowne Plaza Hotel report by Graham -Bunting Associates, May 12, 2009 (hereinafter "Exhibit B"); c. Steam Assessment (Consistent with Renton Municipal Code Section 4,8- 120) for the Main Water Installation Associated with the Hawk's Landing Water and Stormwater Improvements City of Renton, King County, Washington, by Gray & Osborne, June 16, 2010 (hereinafter "Exhibit C'). Declaration in Support — Page 2 rte' Renton City Attorney 400 S 2"" St U PO Box 626 ♦ ♦ Renton, WA 98057-0626 Phone: 425.255.8673 N�,Q Fax: 425.255.5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 s 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 7. Petitioner makes a number of assertions or assumptions that are factually and/or scientifically incorrect in his Petition for Review. S. Petitioner claims, throughout his petition, and specifically on pages 4 — 7, and 9, that the conveyance outlet pipe "ponds' an "extremely large quantity of water runoff and infiltrates a significant portion of that water runoff to Quendall Terminals and Lake Washington." Renton has three responses to these claims. 9. First, as for the existing ditch water that Petitioner claims "ponds" at the Pan Abode/work site and runs off to Quendall Terminals and Lake Washington, that water is confined to the Pan Abode site by Lake Washington Boulevard North and the BNSF railroad. As illustrated by Exhibit the Lake Wa. Blvd. Vicinity Map, the water would have to rise over Lake Washington Boulevard, rise uphill over the BNSF railroad and flow diagonally to get to or near Quendall Terminal. Without a pump, that is virtually impossible. 10. Second, the flow of groundwater near the Pan Abode/work site is south to May Creek, rather than north towards Quendall Terminal. This is illustrated in Exhibit B the Wetland/Stream Study., Hawk's Landing Crowne Plaza Hotel report. In that report, on page 2, it states (speaking of the Pan Abode site which is adjacent to the Renton infrastructure site), that the proposed hotel site "is predominantly flat, however, the northern portion of the site, adjacent to the entrance of the existing Pan Abode facility, resembles a bowl shaped depression designed to receive stormwater runoff from multiple catch basins located along the southbound on-ramp to 1-405 and Lake Washington Boulevard. Stormwater runoff from the Declaration in Support — Page 3 Y a Renton City Attorney � 100 S 2nd St PO Box 626 * Renton, WA 99057-0626 Phone: 426.255.8678 ��N �Q Fax: 425.255.5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1Q 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 catch basins is transmitted to the northern portion of the subject property, through an existing 24 -inch WSDOT storm pipe and discharges into the northern end of the Lake Washington Boulevard drainage ditch, located along the eastern right of way of Lake Washington Boulevard. Stormwater from the subject property is also collected and discharged to the ditch at this location. The open ditch extends approximately 500 feet to the south where it enters a 24 -inch corrugated plastic pipe that flows an additional 60 feet south before discharging into May Creek." 11. Third, Renton intends to eliminate the "ponding of water" by constructing a new 24 -inch pipe to collect and -treat 1-405 and Lake Washington Boulevard North runoff in a wet bio-swale, convey existing WSDOT runoff into the new 24 -inch storm water pipe and provide pipe stubs for existing areas that drain into the ditch. The project drainage report, in Exhibit A the Lake Wa. Blvd. Vicinity Map makes clear that based on the shape of the northern most part of the Pan Abode site, and the fact that Quendall Terminals is across Lake Washington Boulevard and farther north, the runoff or drainage of water from Pan Abode to Quendall Terminals is virtually impossible. 12. Petitioner also claims on petition pages 5-6, that the dissolving orange metal of the abandoned Pan Abode buildings, on private property, is discharging into May Creek. 13. First, Petitioner is correct in surmising that due to many years of Pacific Northwest rain, the building roof's protective coat has worn away and the roof has rusted. 14. However, the orange water substance in the ditch cannot be attributed to one source since it could be from the abandoned buildings rusting roof, brake dust from vehicles on Declaration in Support — Page 4 **'WO'e Renton City Attomey S5, 400SeSt Po Box 626 Renton, WA 48057-0626 Phone: 425.255.8678 Fax. 425.255.6474 1 � t 2 3 9 5 6 7 s 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 29 25 1-405, and/or possibly the soil substances or minerals that could be naturally occurring in the soil. The northwest soils have naturally occurring sulfur bacteria, hydrogen sulfide, manganese, iron and other metals. There is a high probability that the orange substance is naturally occurring. 15. The Stream Assessment, (Exhibit C,.p. 2) noted that "[ijron bacteria have turned the water in the ditch orange." Irrespective of the source of the discoloration in the ditch, Renton's project will utilize catch basins with sumps to settle solids such as rust from the existing Pan Abode building or vehicle brake dust, and a bio-swale to further settle solids and thereby clean and improve the drainage water quality. The proposed stormwater wet swale facility has been proven by the State of Washington, via thousands of successful applications, to be one of the best methods for water quality treatment. 16. Petitioner then claims on petition pages 10, 13, 15, and 18-19, that the storm water infiltration/runoff from the proposed Hawk's Landing Hotel should be supported by some sort of water quality facility and that the LWB Project is being done for the benefit of the still - to -be -built hotel. Respectfully, that is not Renton's project. It is unknown to the City at this time if the "Seahawk's Hotel", as Mr. Nicholson refers to it as its project name, will be built. Furthermore, the Lake Washington Boulevard Project is for the benefit of the receiving stream and will treat only runoff from the road right-of-way areas, not the "Seahawks' Hotel". 17, The Lake Washington Boulevard North Storm and Water System Improvement Project (LWB Project), for which the appealed shoreline substantial development permit was issued, is a standalone project to assist the entire Exit 7 area to discharge better quality water, Declaration in Support — Page 5 Y Q Renton City Attwney + 100 S 2n° St Bax 626 ♦ * Renton, WA 98057-0626 Phone: 425.255.8678 �iN�Q Fax: 425.255.5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 deliver more reliable water flow to combat fires, and potentially to provide a framework for a soft -surface trail for the general public. The LWB Project is not related to any specific proposed development. Renton is retrofitting and improving an existing roadway storm runoff area and the water system to benefit Renton, and the environment in and around May Creek. This work I also lays the foundation for a possible regional soft surface trail. 18. While I do not know what will happen with the "Seahawk's Hotel" project, I do know that the LWB Project has and will move forward regardless of the outcome of the "5eahawk's Hotel" project, which at the date of this signing still has not received funding to start construction. Additionally, and very significantly, if the "Seahawks' Hotel" project or any other project is initiated at the Pan Abode site, the project developer will be responsible for having to satisfy all applicable Renton codes and applicable state laws, including but not limited to, on-site drainage, and water runoff. 19. Petitioner, on petition pages 14-15, claims that Renton is involved in stream alteration. Renton is not altering May Creek. The only change to May Creek is that, because of the catch basins and wet bio-swaie, the water that will drain into May Creek after construction of the LWB Project will be cleaner. The flow of water in May Creek should remain the same after this project is completed. 20, Petitioner, on petition page 6, claims that Renton's "'revitalization permit will needlessly tear up the shoreline esthetics [sic] and disrupt habitat, permanently block the area from public access and enjoyment, and discharge its polluted water into May Creek." 21. Mr. Nicholson could not be more wrong. The LWB Project does the opposite by Declaration in Support —Page 6 ��Y Q Renton City Attorney j 104 S 2nd St + ♦ 626 Re W Box Renton, WA 96057-0626 Phone: 425.255.8576 ��� Fax: 425.255.5474 Zit Wfl- 0 150 3DO 600 e w .7- Feet � ' x �C _ y. LakeJ. Washington_ A a a Y � _ ul m 3 i - S 012&m f Y! - � T� �4p . ~610 •^. 4CITY OF RENTON r - Lake Wa. Blvd- Hawk's Landing Storm and Water Improvements Project Figure 1 Vicinity Map f F ti "Alfu. .. $. • 1 2 3 4 5 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1) improving the aesthetics of May Creek by Lake Washington Boulevard by filling in the orange water ditch that is outside the Shoreline buffer area; 2) not disrupting any natural habitat that contains any wetland buffers or the May Creek buffer areas per the Creek shoreline buffer area designation; 3) providing a pourous concrete sidewalk from which to view May Creek and allow safe pedestrian access along Lake Washington Boulevard; 4) stabilizing and improving municipal water flow to this region; 5) providing safer and more fire fighting flows to this Exit 7 area; and 6) cleaning drainage water thereby improving the quality of water entering May Creek and ultimately Lake Washington. 22. Additionally, where the pipes are being replaced, and where the bio-swale is being installed, there is little to no native vegetation in those areas. (See Exhibit C, p. 1-2, and 4). 23. The discharge pipe is not being altered or replaced and does not trigger any other permits. 24. The net result of the LWB Project is a more reliable municipal water flow to the area, and cleaner and improved water quality discharging into May Creek and ultimately into Lake Washington. DATED THIS 4 November 2010, at Renton, Washington. CITY OF RENTON Declaration in Support —Page 7 Steve Lee Civil Engineer, P.E., CESCL, M.S. City of Renton -y Q Renton City Attorney 100 S 2n4 St ♦ + PO Box 626 y .i Renton, WA 98057-0626 Phone -425.255.0670 Fax: 425.-255.5.5474474 Wetland/Stream Study: Hawks Landing Crowne Plaza Hotel Prepared for; r � g� Dan Mxtzel i`<I rx Hawk's Landing LLC 1111 Cleveland Ave. Mount Vemon, SVA 98273 Prepared by: Graham -Bunting Associates Errwonmental & Lzwd Use Services 3543 Legg Road Bow, WA 48232 Ph 360. 766.4441 Fx, 360, 766.4443 May 12, 2009 Table of Contents Section/Subsection Fie Project Summary 1.0 Introduction -- 2.0 Existing Conditions 1 3.0 Project Description 3 4.0 Existing Information 3 4.1 National Wetland Inventory 3 4.2 Soil Survey of Kang County 4 4.3 May Creels Basin Action Plan 5 4.4 Barbee Mill (BA) 5 4.5 Fawcett Property Wetland Delineation 5 4.6 .Forest Practice Activity Map 5 5.0 Stream Study 5 5.1 Riparian Functions- -- 5 5.2 Ordinary High Water Mark 7 5.3 Stream Classification and Regulations g 6.0 Wethwd Study 9 6.1 Methodology 9 6.2 Findings 10 6.3 Data Summary Table 11 6.4 Data Digest -- 11 6.5 Wetland Classification and Regulations - 12 7.0 Regulatory Summary and Mitigation Measures 13 7.1 May Creek 13 7.2 Drainage Ditch (Class 5 Water) 14 7.3 Wetlands A and B 14 7.4 Drainage Ditrh (wed wetland) - 14 7.5 Water Quality 14 8.0 Closure 14 9.0 References - 15 Attachments Wetland Delineation and Stream Study Existing Conditions Site Plan ---- Anachrnent A Proposed Conditions Attaclunent B Wetland Field Data Formes — Attachment C Graham -Bun in Associates Hawks Landing May 2009 Emliroritnewal &Land Use Services PROJECT SUMMARY Proj�: Construction of a 5 story, 122,000 square foot, 173 roam hotel including underground parking and Found level parking. ptojoct Site: The project site is a 3.06 -acre area situated on a triangular shaped parcel of approximately 7.8 acres. The subject property is bordered by bterstate 405 in the east, Lake Washington Boulevard in the west and an undeveloped parcel to the south. Proiect Location: The subject property is located at the southwest corner of the Interstate 405 and Lake Washington Boulevard/N.E. 44h Street exit at 4350 Lake Washington Boulevard North, within portions of Sections 29 and 32, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, WA. King County Parcel Number: 3224059049. Prci ect Pro nt: Dan Mittel Hawk's Landing LLC 1 l 11 Cleveland Ave. Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Methods: Wetland - Routine On -Site Methodology, 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Technical Report Y-97- 1) - Corps Interim Regional Supplest, April 2008 Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, March 1997, )ecology Publication #96-94 City of Renton Critical Area Regulation: RMC 4-3-050 City of Renton Shoreline Master Program: RMC 4-3-090 Field Dates: March 23, April 8, April 14 and April 24, 2009 Streams & Wetlands: May Creels - Class 1 Water, Shoreline of the State Drainage ditch - Class 5 Water/Nonregulated Wedand Wetland A - 433 square foot Category 2 Wetland Wetland B - 481 square foot Category 2 Wetland Pro ed Mitition: Subject proposal will avoid any direct impacts to regulated screams and wetlands by ±,�a ntaining setbacklbuffers that exceed the standards of the City's Critical Area RegaMons and Shoreline Master Program. Project Staff: Graham BunringAssociates Hawks Landing lblav 2009 Patricia Bunting, Wetland Ecologist PWS Oscar Graham, Wetland Ecologist ii Environmental & Land Use Services May 12 2009 Graham Bunting Associates D vironmental & LQnd Use Services 3643 Legg Road Bow, W.A 98232 Darr Mitzel Ph. 360 766.4441 Fy 360.766 4443 Hawk's Landing LLC 1111 Cleveland Ave_ Mount Vernon, WA 98273 StreamMettand Study {Portions of Sec# on 29 & 32 Township 24 north, RMW 5 )East, W.M., Renton, WA) LB Introduction At the west of Hawks Landing LLC, Graham; investigation and prepared the Poll Bing Associates {GBA) have conducted a site rt addressig stems and wetlands within and adjacent to. the site of the posed Hawk's I,sr►d4 crown Plaza Hotel. The report add,.. tkstre= and wetland study requirements established under the City ofRautmis Critical Areas P,V iOns (RMC 4-3-050). The report includes a characteriratioax o€existing conditions, project &P on; -4�Y of existigg in&rmation sources and a narrative description of our in�ve prooedures and findings. The report includes plan sheets prepared by Sound Development Group depicting odsting and proposed site moons. The sy�jact p .:, laca<t d at the, sopthvvest corner of the Intesiaft. 403 4nd Lake Washingtan A4 S6r a eicit a' 435U Labe W hingtau ev. W Norik widen portions a€ 29 and 32, T'owrasiup 24 Ncsztii; Rhinge S F,asE, W. King Cou*, WA. King county . R!J­Wd _bI - ber> 3224059049: Figure 1 Terrace —' USGS (1983) Fi gone 2 Mci so VfiW Earfk (2008 The Prate site is a 3.06 acre. area situated- on a . acres. Tlx su ed �� shaped Parcel of Approximately 7.S bl Property is bordered by Itmstate 405 in the east, sake Wash*tOn B ulvard in the wast and an undeveloped parcel to the. 'south. The property is carruly Ocmipied by Pan Ab xk Cedar Harnes and is developed with metal warehouses used for Marr" WWring materials associaied with the production of cedar homes. An and stored ou the site. Ile S are d . �.ti+e �offioe is also located ucted on a fill pad surfaced with crashed rack and asphalt. The site has been filly developed for � purposes_ Graham -B' Associates 1. Ein+inonnYerria! &Land Use Servicer Hawks %ria ntQAs�e.�smenrL172109 L vege#ation exists witlltn t hl Ate' itself The. eastern and western nanny within tlye 3? Ys of I405 aad Labe. W mux a£ native and invasive pL pqxr consist of i� alder n Boulevard 6�x� are dominated + Ius balstrrafem} and Western � cedar�(T'hufa (stlonr ra imus drsaoior); red osier dogwood i+e _ ), Indian plum {fie. cerasirirmis�, Japanese ked o �? sword (Polysrim)An e ditcho+°'urn p ;.L l Wasltmg�pri catod. between the bits a smell comutity of cattail aypha and a duck mat of reed y {Pi�crlarrs arundirracea}.: Th�l looted south t2Le sub' J ppe tY inch May C acid its associated s!eProperty.. afnteub May Crus vanes fire 235 % in the east-(4apont to the on-ramp to 1405) to 58 feet in the west (adjacent to Lake Washington Dmdev�.. AmaWm deciduous gest consisting of large black and big leafmaplc (Acer macro �'�Od (i5".. 3S" dbh), alder �'slum dominates � the.ripar n corridor. The umerstory includes vigorous coianies of invasive blackberry and Japanese knatweed, saitnon spEcfahilis), feed O'cnaryWass and sword fern. A small �) � observed in warty of slough sedge (C'arex CPU&oottjunction with a wetland idera fled along` the right bank of May The subject property is predominant) y flat, the entrance of the existing pan Abo however, the northern portion of the •site, adjacent to ', resembles a bowl shaped dept�iort des*ncd to receive stormwaW nmOff &— tnuhiple catch basins located along the southbound on - 405 and Lake W rarnp.t�o I - the northern ashiagion Bouie�and Stomayvater ruux�$ fi x the Hca & basins is transmitted W portion of the subject Property � d ►arged to the. nc rthem end of the -open drainage ditch, k*ated along the a rn right of way of Lake nail W flthe subject property is also c�Qllected ton Boulevard. Stormwater discharged to the ditch at this lmation. The open d'bch. exmnds VW070 #el3r 500 feet to the south where it enters a buried 24 -inch comwawd plastic pipe- that flows an Wdifianai SQ drainage cnten! the rlideb fi�oan sxuth bre discharging to may. Creek. Additional su P rty near the to the -buried i May M& flows into 14" W pipe. y (A A dstilog I— aPP ly .25 miles southwea,,of the subject prcpenY pious site zVia},j Grahmn-Bs�tttm.A�ei�ties 2 Hawks i n es�i ent /1 x/(19 nal �dUse Ser+vj s 3.0 Project Description The proposal is to demolish: the existing structures associated with the Para Abode facility and utilize approximately 3.06 acres of the subject property for construction of a 5 story, 122,000 square foot, 173 room hotel. The proposed Hawks Landing Crowne Plaza Hotel willconsist of- One f One level of undtWound Parlang with. apprwdmately 107 stalls * Grua floor hotel reception area with meeting rooms and apprommadely 742 square feet, 2,152 square feet, and 3,360 square feet for retail, spa and restaurant facilities respectively Four kevels of guestnoafns • A WW of approximately 125 surface level panting stalls: including five spaces dated fpr Neighborhood Etectdc Vehicles (NEVs)) 1 w6 access points along bake Washington Boulevard $ water facilities including rain gardens s. ` Sanitary semr, water and other utilities prekduary designs indicate that the hotel will rnamtam a maximum height of 60 feet. Regtzirerl use perinks include site plan review, envuUmnMW review pursuant to the Sure Policy Act (SEPA), building permits and a street vacation. All development including mired iafiasttucure will be located a minimura of 277landward of the ordinary hihfed 'ate mark (OHWM) ofMay Creek. (Attachr B: Proposed Conditions) 4.0 ung Infornation The subject property has been addressed under a number of existing studies. These inion sources have been reviewed and synthesised to assist GBA m.vharacwnzmg the snbject property. The sources are summarised as follow. 4.1 Magi W hnTppQa The National Wetland Inventory (iV" is campded by the U.S. Department of Interior's Fish and Wildlife Service,. NWI relies upon visual aerial photo interpretation of wetland indicators iaduding hydrologic, vegetation and tcpopraphic signatures. NWI does not icy wetlands within the vicinity of the subjectproperty= ,should be recognised however; did the forest canopy associated with the riparian oomdar of May Creek would `h1mly,obscure the indicators upon which NWI relies. GRA utilize NWI only as a genmral=dmap uxhcation of the possible GralrantBwak Associates 3 Eavzrdrtmental & Land Use services H L�w!dft Awegwwnt 11W09 presence and exert of wetlands. Reconnaissance and delineation procedures are always based on an on-site assessment. 42 SW Sun e, off KU County. Area Wasj i The Soil Survey is conviled by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and includes mapped soil stats registered to detailed descnpbons of soil characteristics. The survey identifies one soil unit within the subject property boundaries. Themap unit appears to include the entire floodplain associated with lower May Creek. Na -Norma sandy loam is a poorly dramod soil typically found on floodplains:with slopes between 0 and 2 percent, The parent mataial is alluviunx Minor components include Seattle, Tukwila and Shalcar soils. Norma sandy loam is listed as a hydric soil under criteria 1.,.2, b) (3) and 3. 1., All Histosols except folists 2, Soil in Aquic suborders, great groups, or subgroups, Albo% suborder, Aquisalids, Pathic subgroups, ar Cumulic subgroups that are, b) poorly drained or very Poorly drained and have either: (3) water table equal to 1.0 feet from the surface during the growing season if permeability is less than 6.0 inchesilrour in any layer within 20 inches. 3. his that are fi-equeatly ponded for long duration or very long duration during the growing season. 4.3 MAY CffA Basin Acti Plantil 20:01 The May Creek Basin Actim Plain was funded by King County abd the Cify of Rem outlines a set of actions addressing the threat of flooding, f altaton of stminwatmr conveyance to stabilize stream banks and reduce emmon, protect and enhance fish and wildlife'babitat and water quality. The plan is intended to prevent misting problems within the basin from becoming worse in the Grnhmn Bunfi AAmdates 4 L_m. tarl & Lama Use Servfces Hawks Lan ft Assessment f5/121og future_ The plan provides baseline information relating to conditions in the basin including a reap sheet reflecting the approximate location and extent of wetlands. It is noteworthy that the wetland reap identifies a small wetland in the vicinity of the drainage ditch described under existing conditions. 4.4 Biological Assessment: Barbee Mill Prey� plat fAuustt30Z} Raedke Associates, Inc. prepared a Biological Assessment (BA) consistent irith the requirements of the Endangered Species Act to evaluate potential effects of the proposed subdivision on federal and state fisted species. The BA includes a characterization of Mav Creels and Lake WashiVon, documents species use, and identifies mitigating conditions to ameliorate project generated impacts to listed species_ The Barbee Mill development is located just west of Lake Washington Boulevard adjacent to the subject property. 4.5 Wetland Delineation Re port• Fawcett property (December 24001 Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. prepared a Wetland Delineation Report addressing a portion of the area located south of the subject property. While the contiguous area south ofthe subject property is under the ownership of Dr_ Greg Fawcett, the delineationfocused only on the area south' of May Creels. The report includes observations relating to May Crede and hydrology, soil and vegetation within the riparian corridor. 4.6 Forest Practice AgtivitYMap The Washington State Department of Natural Resources maps and classifies waters of the state pursuant to WAC 222-16-031 on the Forest Practice Stream Type Maps. The maps were reviewed to assist in c}aazacterizing the project area. May Creek is identified as an S (shoreline) Water of the State, Type S waters are defined as: "All waters, within their bankfull widtlk, as inventoried as `shorelines of the state, under chapter 90.58 RCW and the rules promulgated pursuant to chapter 90.58 RCW including periodically inundated areas of their associated wetlands. No additional Waters of the Stats were identified on the Stream Type Maps, 5.0 Streams Study May Creels originates from the outlet of Lake Kathleen and flows westerly approximately 8.6 miles to Lake Washington. The May Creek imatershed drains approximately 14 square miles of residential, open space, agricultural, commercial, industrial and public infrastructure development including runoff front 1405. The stream reach Iocated south of the subject property lies between the 1-405 bridge crossing in the east and the Lake Washington Boulevard bridge crossing in the west. This reach of May Creek is identified as Reach B and characteriz od in the City of Renton Draft Shoreline Inventory and Analysis as relatively unaltered (Renton Draft Shorey Inventory, November 2008) 5A Riparian Functions Observations gathered during our site investigation, conducted during the early spring of 2009, indwate a nigh level of m stxeam and riparian corridor functions. The stream is low gradient (< 8%) and displays a complex of low velocity pools mixed with swifter moving riffles and runs. 1n stream stracture is provided by naturally recruited large woody debris (LWD) consisting of native deciduous species and installed habitat features including anchored root wads and cabled logs. Riparian functions are closely lurked to vegetation along the stream bank and adjacent floodplain. GrahamzBuntingAssod es 5 Environmental & Land Use Services Hawks Lanefinz Assessment (5,'171(39 LWD Recut - While kW conifers am generally the preferred source of LWD, the presence ofmatu e, deciduous species dirouabout the stream reach provides an ongoing source for recrunmeut of woody, material into the strewn. LWl] PrMotes complexity within the stream and provides holding areas for salmonids and resident fish species. Bank Stability — The throe strata vegetation community along the riparian corridor promotes bank stability through estabiislunt of deep root system The anchareti roots help hold the sandy loam of the floodplain intact and minimize the forces of erosion, so m=tabon and increased turbidity. Reed amass, often viewed as an undesirable species, is very eive in prarnatiag hank stabiliratim unforbzuaWy it also may cola= aggressively reducing the diversity of native plant species. Shade - The deciduous tree canopy provides shade daring loan flow sumaner months and helps to maintain cool temperatures and maintain dissolved oxygen levels m ir,ed by salmonids and resident fish species. Water .Quality - Fit vegetation mcluding vigorous commusaities of reed canarygrass coubguous to the QIRWM provide for the filtering of sediments and pollutants. Reed canarygrass is: viewed as an invasive species; -however, its dense, mat like quality provides au excellent filtering fuachon, that helps prevent delivery of sediments and pollutaats to rooeiving waters. Fish and Wddi fie Habitat — Uble no salmonids or resident fish species were observed during our site investigation, May'Creek is reportedly utflized by Chinook (Qncorhynchus tshawytscha), Coho (Oncoihynchus lisutch) and Sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) salmon. Wing steelhead (Qncorhynchus mybss) and eaiducat trait (&Imo clar a clam) are also ]mown to utilize the cheek: (Renton DrR t Shoreline Invent)ry, November 2008). Puget Sound annook sah = and Puget Sound stedhead are listed as threatened under the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), Puget Sound6trait of Georgia Coho salmon are listed as a candidate species under FSA: May Creek.does not have a self sustah mpg Chinook run. Chinook -observed in May Creeds an h1oly strays Ern the Cedar River (Lucchette 2002). Colo are known to utilize Lake Washirk t and May Geek. Coho tuns in Lake Wim. are heavily influenced by �Y production (Raedeke 2002). Puget Sound Steelhead have utilized May Creek on a historic basis and may remain print m depressed numbers (Salmonscape. 2009). A Graham Bin ftn Aawiares 6 F�ffgw ntal & d Use Servi s Hawks LgIft Assessmenr /12/09 renew of pertinent literature relating to Lake Washington salmonid stocks indicates a high degree of u cerWnty as to the genetic origins of salmonids utilizing May Creek. It is possible that individuals from the Puget Sound and Puget Sound Strait of Georgia Evolutionary Significant Units (ESUS) utilize the habitat provided by the creek- The riparian area provides excellent feeding and cover habitat for birds, including woodland hawks and passerine species. Small mammals such as voles utilize uplands within the riparian area "for burrow*. GBA observed blacktad deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbiamas) droppings AW hoof prints within the riparian corridor. Common snipe (Capella gallinago) were fluted durit#g'several site inspections at a location near the bridge crossing at Lake Washington Boulevard. A short tailed weasel (Mustela erminea) was also observed burrowing in the np rap near the Bridge abutment. A pair of Osprey (Pana5an hahatus) was observed perched on a nest platform near the mouth of May Creek. Additional species were observed during our site investigation including. song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus) black -capped chickadee (Poecile atricapd1a) hairy woodpecker (Picoides villosu_c) spotted towhee (Pipdo maculatus) wuner wren (Troglodytes troglodytes) mallard hen and drake (Anas platyrhynchos) unidentified buteo (Buten sp.) American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) gull. species (Larus sp-) 5.2 Ordinary High Water Mark GBA reviewed the location of the OHWM as identified and flagged in the field by David Evans Associates (DEA) in 2006 and Sound Development Group (SDG) in 2009. The guidance contained in the statutory &Tmition was utilized -in confirming the location of the OHWM. "The Ordinary high grater mark on all takes, sm ams and tidal water is that mark that'"rin be found by examining the beds and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continues m all ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation as that condition exists on June 1, 1971 or as it may naturally change thereafter; PROVfDED_ that m any area where the ordinary high water mark cannot be found, the ordinary high water mark adjoining salt water shag be the line of mean higher high tide and the ordinary high water mark adjoining fresh water shall be the fine of mean high mater-" In addition, the definition contained in the Renton Municipal Code under 4-11-010 was also considered. Review Evers aided by a series of high water events occurring during the late winter and early sprue of 2009. These one to two year flows generally correlated with the physical evidence observed along the bank of the creek. The OHWM was identified based on scour and drift limes, sediment deposits, topographic features and vegetation transitions located at or near the top of the right bank. It was not deemed necessary to adjust any of the flags placed previously by DEA and SDG. The OHWM as flagged was surveyed and is depicted on the map sheets accompanying this report- GrahamnBuntin Associates 7 Environmental & Land ase Services Hawks Landing Assessment (5/12' 5 3cb arxi classifieahon and Rezuiations The City's Critical Area R%mlatiow RMC 4-3-050 classify May Creek as a Class 1 water. Class =I W. f *are perelmial salmon bearing waters classified by the City and State as Sborclines of the � .Subsection L: Streams and Lakes: 1. Applicability/Lands; to Which These Regulations Apply-stipuiatet that the City's critical area regulations do not apply to Class 1 waoters which ars regu ated by RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Regulations. Subsection 4-3-090, 5, d. hs* tive standard setback for commercial development as follows: "A comroercud building should be located no closer than fifty (50) to the ordinary high water:ma however, the Land Use Hearing Examiner may reduce this requirement through the vanance process for good reason for those struc win #hat allow public access tp and alo7n8.the waters edge, °' .ci -Mopnx=t related to the prWosed Hawk's Landing Crowne Plaza Howl will be located a tum of 248 feet landward of the OHWM of May Cry€. The subject proposal is % cated aulside of the 2130 -£oat judsdchonal area of the Shoreline Manag=ent Act (SMA) and the City s 5hord ne Master Program (SMP) and xs therefore compliant with the required 50 -foot sed*& requiremexiL ` badrainage ditch located predommantly within the right of way of Lake WaEslrirrgtnn Boulevard was also assessed in light of the City's Critical Area Regulations and identified as a class 5 water. RMC 4-3-050 L. Streams and Lakes: 1. a. v. (a) (b) establishes the criteria for Class 5 waters as follows: `°v. Class 5: Class 5 warms are noir-regulated n,ca salmonid -bearing wafters which meet we or more of the following criteria: (a) flow within an artificially constructed channel where no naturally defined channel had previously existed; and or (b) Are a`surficially isolate water body less than one-half (0.5) acre (e.g• pond) not meeting the criteria for a wetland as defined in subsection M. of this se+c On,M GruhmnB>Entin Associaft $ tai & Land Use Services Hawks Lm&n .Assessment 5 IV09 GBA conferred on site with the Area Habitat Biologist from the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) on April 24, 2009 who provided the follo%%ing observations and ,guidance: • The ditch is a man made feature Work within the ditch itself will not require Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) from WDFW + Work on the outfall to May Creek would require an HPA Any proposed irmprovernent to the outfall should prevent entry of fish to the ditch Based on observations gathered during Our site investigation and consultation with the Area Habitat Biologist, GBA have determined that the drainage ditch is a non -salmon bearing water_ The location and profile of the ditch indicate that it is an artificially constructed channel designed and actively maintained to coveystormw nrnoff frorn I-405, Lake Washington Boulevard and the Pan Abode facility. GBA have determined that the drainange ditch satisfies Criteria (a) as a Class 5 Water and is therefore not regulated under the City's Critical Arra Regulations. The ditch will be discussed further under the following Wetland Study, 6.16 Wetland Study The following discussion addresses the procedures and methods utilized in our wetland investigation and provides a summary of our findings. 6.1 Methodol GBA utilized the Washington State Wetlands Iderari3cation and Delineation Manual (Ecology 1997) which is a revised version of the 1987 Corps of ER&Wpers Wetland Delineation Manual ITechaical rt Y-87-1) in the preparation of this report. The Ecology Manual (along with the recent Corps of Engineers regional supplement, April 2008) represents the accepted standard for identifying and delineating wetlands for;unsdictional purposes under the Clean Water Act. GBA considered the new interim regional supplement in the assessment of field data. The Ecology manual has been adopted for use by the City of Renton for use in conjunction with the Growth Management Act mandated Critical Areas Ordinance. Both the Ecology and Corps manuals incorporate the Clean Water Act Definition of Wetlands as fellows: 4 'TMose areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration. sufficient to support and that under norrmal circumstances civ support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs and similar areas." The City's Critical Areas Ordinance stipulates additional defining elements as follows: "Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands created frorn non -wetland sites, including but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass lined males, canals, detention facilities, wastmater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result Of the construction of a road, stred or highway. Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created fim non_N%cdand areas created to mitigate conversion of wetlands.,, Graham-Bunrin Associates 9 Environmental & Land L%se Services Hawks Landirrg Assessment (5/12'49 -5'hflf � M Nirm tinct three interrelated defining elements or parameters be established - Aftb* g'3nig wetlands. These pararrieters are wetland hydrology, hydric soils and }tie Iregetation. { 1 d-H3*Oiogy Water is the driving force, which creates and sustains wetlands. The 1987 Manual and subsequerit Co ., guii w identifies tvedands as areas where soils are inundatedor continuously saturated . a minimum of 5% of the growing season (approximately 12.5 days for Western Washington). w Whai dict observation of the water table cannot be made hydrology .�. � is determined by relying hYdro!*c indicators such as hydric soil characteristics, f or dries p�� water marks, drift lines, sediment f Hydrip,.$;od CqAWS Odubit hydric soils. These are soils which are saturated, fooled or ponded long enough dirrmg the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions. 'These are conditions arhere no free a qgm is Present in the upper soil horizons. Typical field indicators of hydric soils are the .._v _ pr iae;a'#'a thick organic layer, or in predominantly mineral soils such as found on this site, a low,d roma matrix (gray color) and/or bright mottling. Soil chronics are determined by cahwarhig sail. samples with color chips in the Munsell Color Charts. Hydmphytic Vegetation Tine U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has classified wetland vegetation according to its frequency of occurrence m wetlands. Obligate wetland species (QBL) occur in wetlands greater than 9910 of the time. Facultative wetland species (FACW) occur in wetlands greater than 67% of the time. Facultative species (FAC) Occur in wetlands 34%-66% of the time. Facultative upland species ( 'ACU) occur in wetlands less than 34% of the time. Upland species (UPL) occur in wetlands less than; I% of the time. Generally the hydrophytic vegetation parameter is satisfied when greater than 50% of the species present at a data connection pout have an indicator status of QBL, FACW and/or FAC; when two or more dominant species have observed morphological or known physiological adaptations for' occurrence in wetlands; or when other indicators of hydrophytic vegetation are present. 6.26.2 FESS GBA conducted the site investigation on March 23, April 8, April 14 and April 24, 2069. Observations were collected over a period of a month during weather conditions that transitioned from cold and wet to sunny and seasonable. Little plant growth was rioted during our initial site visit, however, by mid April plants were exhibiting active growth. Indian plum, saiinonberry and elderberry were rapidly leafing out and Japanese knotweed colonies along the bank of May Creek N%w emerging &orn dormant rhizomes. GBA consider the timing and weather conditions of our investigation to be optmW for the identification of wetlands. Two areas were investigated: 1) The subject property (pan Abode facility) and its perimeter including the drainage ditch along Lake Washington Boulevard. and; 2) The floodplain south of the subject property to the right (north) bank of May Creek: Both areas were traversed and visually inspected for indications of wetland hydrology and hydrophytic vegetation. The ordinary high water mark of the drairxage ditch was identified and flagged on site. A single data point (DP - 7) was established along the top of the bank_ A second data pour (DP -2) w -m assessed just east of the ditch along the southern boundary of the subject property. Three rough transects tvere established in an east/west aspect between May Creek and the subject property. Six data points Graham SuniirrgAssoeiates 10 ErxvirarnnenIOI & Land Use Services ffawks Lg7d Lng Assessment i/l ?�9 6:3,D - ata _Summary Table *Wetland parameter satisfied 6A Data Dust Based on the above data summarized above, two regulated wetlands were identified; Wetlands A and B are small depressional wetlands located within the floodplain of May Crede with areas of 433 and 481 square feet respectively. The wetlands receive their hydraulic charge from a seasonal bigh water table, precipitation and periodic overbank flooding of May Crede. The wetlands are distinguished from the surrounding uplands because they are distinct topographic features, exhibit saturated soils and are dominated by hydrophytic vegetation. Wetland A is a deep depression with observable hydrok3gy at the soil surface. Soil displays a very dark matrix chrome accompanied by mottles. Vegetation is dominated by a mix of facultative plant species. Wedand B is a gender depression which exhibits only secondary indicators of wetland hydrology with saturation present well below the soil surface. Soil is sandier and lighter by comparison and vegetation includes a vigorous community of slough sedge (OBL). In addition to Wetlands A and B, the drainage ditch along Lake Washington Boulevard was also assessed in accordanoe with the wetland identification/delineation medhodology. Although, a data Graham-Buntin Associates i 1 Environmental & Land Use Services Hawks Landln�Asw-twwnt (51'12 O91 Dominant VegagOon Status y `*oxidized *sandy loam 2.5Y *Populus balsamifera FAC (20%) rhizosphetes - 412 - rhizospheres - Almts rubra FAC (200%) ' 'fae neutral - sandy redox Cornus stolonifera FACW (5001.) Wet geomorphic 'on Carex obnupta OBL (80%) ` .no izraic ators gravelly loam - *Amus rubra FAC (20%) lOYR 4/3 Rubus discolor FACU (250/.) UP Phalaris arundinacea FACW (95°l0} o indicators silt loam - l OYR Popuha balsamifera FAC (30%0) 3/3 Rubus discolor FACU (l 00°f0 U xin indicators silt loam 10YR 3/3 *Populus balsamifera FAC (100%) Almts rubra FAC (10%) Up Phalaris arundiiaacea FACW (100%) :. no indictors silty clay loam _ Alms rubra FAC (60%) 10YR 212 Rubes discolor FACU (100% U *water table @ 8" *silty clay loam *Amus rubra FAC (60%) saturated to 2.5Y 3/1- 100K Rubus discolor FACU (60%) Wet surface mottles 7-5YR 4/6 Rubus spectabifts FAC (30% y Saturation @ 15" gravelly silt loam *Populus balsamifera FAC (8096) 1OYR 2/2 Rubus discolor FACU (20%) Up Rununculus rens FACW (54/0 saturation below sandy loam 2.5 Y *Alnus rubra FAC (20%) 20" 414 Rubus discolor FACU (200%)7 Cornus stolonifera FACW (20%) *Wetland parameter satisfied 6A Data Dust Based on the above data summarized above, two regulated wetlands were identified; Wetlands A and B are small depressional wetlands located within the floodplain of May Crede with areas of 433 and 481 square feet respectively. The wetlands receive their hydraulic charge from a seasonal bigh water table, precipitation and periodic overbank flooding of May Crede. The wetlands are distinguished from the surrounding uplands because they are distinct topographic features, exhibit saturated soils and are dominated by hydrophytic vegetation. Wetland A is a deep depression with observable hydrok3gy at the soil surface. Soil displays a very dark matrix chrome accompanied by mottles. Vegetation is dominated by a mix of facultative plant species. Wedand B is a gender depression which exhibits only secondary indicators of wetland hydrology with saturation present well below the soil surface. Soil is sandier and lighter by comparison and vegetation includes a vigorous community of slough sedge (OBL). In addition to Wetlands A and B, the drainage ditch along Lake Washington Boulevard was also assessed in accordanoe with the wetland identification/delineation medhodology. Although, a data Graham-Buntin Associates i 1 Environmental & Land Use Services Hawks Landln�Asw-twwnt (51'12 O91 r HF:yv- po. -was not assessed within the ditch itself; the area within the flagged OHWM was determined tri sab*,wetland parameters. Standing water was present in much of the 500 linear foot ditch, SO w- as silty and likely consists of stormwater sediment from surrounding development, V*tation is dominated by reed canaiygiass. Data point 7, established at the top of bank approximately 20 feet west of the existing Part Abode facility was assessed to characterize the am ly ._bdw= the ditch and subject property. No surface water was observed although .Was° present at.a depth of appm1drnately 15 inches from the.soil surface. Soil consisted o£a gray.siit loam; possibly fill f the development of the Pan Abode.faciiity. The soil t�hi dA dark mairix china (IOYR.2i2) but was not accompanied by.redo3dmorphic features. ."b" -Mas a very light silty sand (2.5Y 6/6). Vegetation was dominated by a mix of eve: *nft ax4berbs-:Bwause the hydrology and soil parameters were not satisfied # data poi was t be Upland Rlibtn 9--'Yeav a£ sal profile and fest dirt assessed at data POOW 1. Note saQdy soil and rela�tivety lief mkiix chroma_ _65 Wetland Classification► and ReWations Wefands A and B were -classified in aoaordance with the criteria contained under Subsection 4-3- 050 M. l . a. ii. of the City's Critical Area Regulations as Category 2 wetlands. Category 2 wetlands are wetlands dW ret one of the criteria listed under (a) through (d). Wetlands A and B were fiound to satisfy criteria (d) below: "(d) Wetlands having minimum existing evidence ofbumau related physical alteration such a diking ditching or ciwneliratiau...'" The majority of the floodplain, including Wetlands A and B, located landward of the right bank of May Creek and south of the subject property has not been subject to human related alteration. The wetlands contribute to the riparian functions discussed under the stream study earlier in this report including LWD recruitr Gants stability, shade, water quality and fish and wildlife habitat. The wetlands fill value, however are limited by their small size which represents a combined area of only 414 square feet m a floodplain parcel trialing over 110,000 square feet. RMC 4-3-050 M. 6. c. establishes the standard buffer width required for Category 2 Wetlands at 50 ket.. Required buffers are to be makukwd in their natural condition- Buffers are required to be measured from the wetland ldary.as surveyed in the field. Wetiaad A and B are located offsite 117.4 and 63.8 feet worth of the subject property respeictive#y. The area between the naham Brr�ti�rgAssociates 12 F�vimm nral & Land Use Services Hawks IanAssessment 5/1V09 wetlands and the property line remains in a natural condition and is vegetated primarily with native species. RMC 4-3-050 M_ L e_ i_ establishes the basis for regulated and non regulated wetlands as follows: "i. Regulated and: Nonregulated Wetlands -- General: Wetlands created or restored as a part of a mitigation project are regulated wetlands. Regulated wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwedand sites for purposes other than wetland mitigation, including, but not limited to irrigation and drainage ditches, grass limed males, canals detention facilities, wastmvater treatment facilities, farm pond, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street or highway. The department administrator shall determine that a wetland is not regulated on the basis of photographs, statements or other evidence.,' GSA followed the guidance provided above in assessing the regulatory status of the drainage ditch. The following findings were considered: • The Pan Abode facility was constructed on a fill pad during the mid 1950s • The fill pad appears to extend to a point near the road right of way at the top of ditch • The soil profile assessed at data point 7 displays rock typical of pit run commonly utilized as a fill base • The 2:1 bank profile of the ditch is typical of an excavated storrawater conveyance facility • The hydrology that charges the ditch is composed primarily, of stormwater runoff from I- 405; Lake Washington Boulevard and the Pan Abode facility * Unaltered areas vvithin the floodplain south of the subject property do not include natural linear features similar to the ditch National Wetland Inventory does not ideufy the ditch as a wetland Based on the above findings GBA determined that the drainage ditch was intentionally created from a nonwetland site for the purpose of stormwater conveyance and is therefore a nonregulated wetland under the City's Critical Area Regulations. While the wetland may not be regulated by the City, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers andlor Washington State Department of Ecology may assume jurisdiction over the wetland. 7.0 Regdlatory Summary/Mitigation Measures The following buffers and setback requirements are registered to proposed project actions: 7.1 May Creek May Creels is a shoreline of the state regulated under the Shoreline Management Act and the City of Renton's Shoreline Master Program. The area of jurisdiction under the SMA and SMP extends two hundred feet landward of the OHWM. The closest point of proposed project actions to the OHWM is 277 feet_ The setback for omni nercial buildings from May Creek is currently established under the SMP at 50 feet. The subject property itself is located entirely outside of the required shoreline setback area. The mature deciduous forest located on the parcel south of the subject property varies in %ridth from 64 feet in the ;vest to 235 feet in the cast and provides a full range of protective functions (see subsection 5,1 Riparian Functions). Because the riparian corridor is outside of the Graham-Buntin associates 13 Environmental & Land U'se Services Hawks Landn assessment 5.112!09 subject property boundaries and is not oivned by the applicant, GBA have refrained from characterizing the arca as a buffer. 7.21] miaa&e Ditch l ,drainage ditch is classified as a Class 5 water, It is a non regulated non salmon bearing grater 'Aidli an artificially constructed channel where no naturally defined channel previously existed_ u 71-Wedands A and B '{ WttlmWs A and B are Category 2 Wetlands which rewire 50 foot buffers_ Both wetlands are rn, located offsite south of the subject property. Wetland A is 117.4 feet south of the subject property bbundary and Wedand B is 63.8 feet south of the subject property. The area between the wetlands r and the subject property consists of a mature deciduous forest. Although the uplands surrounding tile=wetlands are not c haracterized as buffers, the deciduous forest provides a high level of buffer functions. 7.4 Drainage Ditch T7e drainage ditch is a nonregulated wetland created from a nonwetland site for the purpose of cowvey* stormwater. 7,5 Water Oualitv In addition to the distance of project actions from the regulated stream and wetlands, rain gardens are purposed in conjunction with the project's drainage plan. The site will be designed consistent with the King County Storm Water Design Manual guidelines for storm cater management. It is anticipated that the water quality of drainage leaving the site will represent an improvement over the existing conditions associated with the aging Pan Abode facility. 8.0 Closure GBA employed currently accepted methods of delineating wetlands and characterizing aquatic features on the site. In addition we utilized the guidance provided in the City of Renton's Critical Area Regulations and Shoreline Master Program m identifying appropriate regulatory requirements. Consultation with the Washington State Department of Irish and Wildlife was conducted to determine fish use of May Creels and the drainage ditch and to determine potential hydraulic project approval requirements. The findings and conclusions redered m this report, however, represent our best professional opinion, Concurrerrce should be obtained from agencies of jurisdiction prior to initiating land use actions or construction_ The report will also provide a sufficient source of information in the event that a jurisdictional determination is requested from the Corps of Engineers. Please call either Patricia Bunting or myself with any questions relating to this report. Sincerely; Oscar Graham Principal Ecologist/project Lead GrahamBuntiMrtssociates Hawks Landrw Assessment (Sit 2109) etmg Patricia Wetland EcologisVPWS 14 Envrmnmenral & Land Use Services 9.0 References Associated Earth Sciences, Inc-, December 7, 2000. Wetland Delineation Report Fawcett Property; Renton, WA, Cawardin I:., V. Carter, F. Galet, E- Lance, 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Departnent of the interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Hitchcock C.L. and A. Cmnquist, 1973 Washington Press, Seattle, 730 pp. Flora of tip Pacific Northwest University of Kung CountY, Apri12001. May Creek Basin Action Plan. Munsell Color. 1994 revised. Munsell Soil Color Charts. K.Urnorgea fi t'uments Corp., Baltimore, MD. Pojar J. and A. MacKinnon, 1994. fwg of the Pacific Northwest r,,W Br" C lurnbia & Alaska. IA= Pine Publishing, Vancouver B. C., 528 pp. O Raedke Associates, Inc., August 26, 2002. Biological Assessment, Barbee Mill Preliminary Plat. Reed, PB, Jr. National List of Plant Species that occur in Wetlands; Northwest (Region 9) National Wetlands hWCDtory, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88 (26.9) 89 pp, Menton Draft Shoreline Inventory, November 2008. S Crowne Deve oPmentt Group, LLC. April 28, 2009. Technical Information Resort; Hawks LTWM Plaza Hotel. U.S. Army Corps of Engino=f 2008. Interim Regional Svpplemeut to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Detineation Manual: Western Mins, Valley,, and Coast ht RW., Lichvar, and C.V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR -08-13. Vicksb egi°� m ed. J.S. Wakeley, Research and Development Center. mS, MS; U.S. Arcxty Engineer Vepraskas, Mike. Technical Bulletin 301, 1999- Redoxirnorphic Features for Id wtify4 Conditions: North Carolina State University, College Agricultturie and Life Seiences3 of 3 �c 3 pp, Washington State Departrneut of Ecology, March 1997, Washington State Wetlands Iden ification and Delineation Manual, Ecology Publication ##96-94. Washington State Department of Natural Re --ml= Forest Practice Activity Map, hit �II`.���v.dnr.t�s �o�i�usincssPemzitslTopicslForestPracricesA-licaiiot�s Washington State DepartmewofFish and Wildlife, ]qtr:(Il�dfi�.z�°a.ecti!rnapoin?rsalmons:<t Personal Comrnunicatiom Fisher, Lang. Area Habitat Biologist, Washing State Dq.,une t of Fisheries. On site discussion relating to drainage ditch along Lake WmIuPgtOn Blvd. April 24, 2009. Severin, Pat P.E. Project Engineer, Sound Development Group,Pro ecu May 12, 2009, J Meetings March through 29h- yn-Bantin Assacrates i5 Em+inon�nental &Land Use Services Hawks Lmrrlih Assessment Sf12i09 , d#- < -w � y oav»«�,� � \\� ,���. .. .. . - {- -- _ -- �g vlwjs- zq \ '} �§ �� Wetland Field Data Forms Attachment C 1 k WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM h i � We fiem INaur[taires, Valleys, and Coast Supplement to the ; 198T COE Wetlands Delineation Manual pHawk� [.aid' Crowne Plaza Date: 3/23J09 i }iawks ksridi LLC Sampling Point DP -1 lt�lU st4tt Fiat/Qsrar/Jaren ,In City/County: RentondKin p. Sew S29 T24N R5E Stale: WA i ritl4bna gape, terrace, etc) Floodplain -1 Loaf relief (concave. owrvex, none) concave $u. {LRR) A tat `� 7 • c � - 1 L , 1 f cid / [datum '! 4o f lap Wit:�lanre�No, Norma NWl da&9dk fiM- Nave 1ue dimatirJtrydrobgic GDWbwS On the site typical for this time of yeah X Yes No (ll W. explain in remarks.) "'Norm,id' Circm> fiancee p asent on ate site? X Yes © No � Ara Y"a t hon 0, Soo. ❑, or Hyd uogy ❑ zowj �rrtiy dist -? No Out are OBL, FACW, a FAQ Am Vgmlabon El Sorl, ❑, or Hydrekw D rraerrriHy Problematic? No (!F needed. explain any a�wers m Remarks.) OF FMINGS - Attach aft show! sampling rd locations, tiarA ectl, ien nt teartum. etc. K vVag eri14 Present? Yes ❑ Nb w tltis Satr ows Pow wtthin a Wedand7 � Yes ®No Yes No "_mrd Hydrt4oify Rvsant7 Yes ® No (17�Ci � '7�Lfi �Oi J �'I i�{! �j T �i'S fr.�f✓'1..� 1L��21� G ATFON -'be scientific natter Tiw ttbVkw MW size 20 ft R S 330nglShrnb Strabrm ff W r� 3 u tt R_,_ j 1. w✓.� i; r G 1r ter.. y w+l.,. 2. size 5 tt R size ;in Herb sbatwn rY US Army Carps of Engineers Absolute % Dominant irtdic-ater D mirtanca Test Worksheet a stagy Numbar of Oorrriinaot Species that arc+ OBL, FAC W, or FAC. (A) Tota! Number of DontMtant Spades Across A9 Strata: , (B) p ' TOW Corer Omit of Dom7wrtt SPK im � Out are OBL, FACW, a FAQ ) Y D Pmalence lrrdex WOrk$ttet T i Of tl ►�b� OBL sped- x 1 = FACW des X2= PAC species . x3= . S = Total FACU spades x4= UfPL spades x 5 = Prevakmm Index = 81 A = Lxxn n gxw teat is > 50% PrevOWM lest 15 5 3-0 (Pro data in remarks or on a separate UU .ff-4 Ol.r._vsas..ln. ae...e . • W*T—tars or rWZRX 1W and wettand hydrology must be p Yes NO Q Ktsfem Mountains. Valleys, and Coast- Interim Version SOR Samplif ft Pant DP -1 HYDRbLdGY Wetland tlp nAoW Indicators, Pronle Desai Describe to the apth needed to document the indikator or Gomm the absence of Indicators. Depth Matrix Redox Fearires inches Cobs moist % Color moist % Type, Lce TeAvre Remarks /A / High Water Table (A2) WatsrStained (except ML1tA 1.2, 4A & 48) (89)Drainage Patterns (BIC) b Sett Crust (B11) Dly-Season Water Table (C2) Webr Clarks (B1) ❑ Aquatic inverYabrates (B13) Sauxation Visble on Aerial imagery (GO) Sedbnertt Deposits (82j 'Type: C=Cpmmntratian, 0 --Depletion, RM --Reduced Matrix CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 'LOC: PL=Pore Lirting, k4013Viu S� rorl kidicators: (Applicable to all L.RRi edmw be doled.) RMftGpWs for Problematic Hydric SoW []ix Kstosol (Al) Sandy Redox (SS) 2cm Muck (AlO) itistic Fpipedon (A2) St<4Pad Matrix (S6) Red Parent! Material cm) 84Kk tiistit (A3) ❑ Loamy y Wmeral (Ft) (except NLRA 1) ❑ Dow (woain in lernaftcs) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Lnamy Gteyed Matrix (F2) ml ❑ Oepieted Below Dark Surface (All) Depleted Matrix (P3) Frog -Heave Huarr* s Thick Dark Suri (Al 2) Redox Durk Surface (F6) a kndiCBRors 0 hydropW vet t bm and wetland bydaokW must Sandi' Mucky Mineral (Si) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (FT) be present, unless disturbed or pmhlernatic Sandy Gaged Mahntt (S4) © Redox Depressions (FS) FMW Obrservi lora ResEnmtive Laver (if oresere Type: Yes hto ❑ Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth {n). r Water Mable tyreeerd7 Hi rrl: 720 Wetland Hydrology Preowd? solE p7 Depth (te): No Depth (m): -7 z d liennagrs ��IrC, ScC� is�t'r.;^�7Q/,5 [t�'C iY�irlirt �,7 , ,! dx !fir wX.S c�r'e ,ire �. l� �g�G Desatbe Recorded Data (Stream gauge, rnonitor" well, aerial Phoma, previous inspections), 0 available HYDRbLdGY Wetland tlp nAoW Indicators, Primary lndicatcvs (rnlnlmum ai onerequirad: chock ilii mat apply)-- Secondary lsdir atnrs tz a more raquiredl: Surface, water (Al) Sparsely Vegataied Concave surface (Be) WalierStainad Leaves (EM OLKA 1, 2, 4A � 48) High Water Table (A2) WatsrStained (except ML1tA 1.2, 4A & 48) (89)Drainage Patterns (BIC) n (A3 Sak"bo) Sett Crust (B11) Dly-Season Water Table (C2) Webr Clarks (B1) ❑ Aquatic inverYabrates (B13) Sauxation Visble on Aerial imagery (GO) Sedbnertt Deposits (82j Hrkw Sulfide Odor (C1) Geornorphic Position (02) DM DDepots (83) OAdtaed RKWsphalong Uv" aUv" Roots (C3) Shallow Aqultmd (D8) Alga! Mat Or Crust (84) presence of Redo Iran (GI) FAC tleuhal Test (D5) on IrDeposits (BS) Recent iron Reduction in Tilled SORs (C6) Raised AM MrxMS (DO) (LRR A) Surface SOR Cracks MO Stu -dad or Stressed Punts (Df) (LRRA) Frog -Heave Huarr* s hrrxl6Mio! Visible Ort Aerial Outran (expWn in remarks) Imagery (07) FMW Obrservi lora Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth {n). r Water Mable tyreeerd7 Hi rrl: 720 Wetland Hydrology Preowd? Yes No ❑ Saturation Present?❑ Yes No Depth (m): -7 z d �� �� mel Desatbe Recorded Data (Stream gauge, rnonitor" well, aerial Phoma, previous inspections), 0 available Very US Army Corps of Engineers Western Ahowtams, Valleys, and Coast— underarm Vsrmon WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM Wester Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Supplement to the 9987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual Project Site: Haw s; Lending, Crnwne Plaza Hotel Sampling hate: 41&09 Appltant/Owner: Hawks Lanolin , LLC.. Sampling Point: DP -2 lnvt3stigator PaUOscar/Jarammf CityfCounty_ RentonAUn Sed-- Tarmsh�, Range: 529 T24N R5E State: VtfA Landform (hittslope, terrace, etc) rry Ey .` fes, �IoPe {96} 2 iaGef reliefc�noave. corrw�c. none 9 { ) l7 i G7 p`w SL&egion (LRR) A Lat 47.5338 Long -122-19U7 Datum Soil Mep tJiltt Name No, Norma NW classlfcatian: }+Sone Are cfenabdhYdrok g* omdrbona on the site typical for this time of year? X Yes No tlf no, explain in remarks.) Are'Normel Circumstances* present on the site? X Yes LLJJ No Are Vegetation ❑, Soil, p, or Hydrology ❑ SOV15cantly disturbed? No Percent Of iaonword species K Are Vegetation ❑, Sail. ❑, or Hydrology ❑ nabrtaly problematic? No (W needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) -'M,UM raAKT Vt' tlNUINCs"b -- AUMh Sift fnap gjooylri Sain ino point locatlorm. bansects, ImpOrtdnt:9attim. etc. Hydro^i. Vegetation Present? Yea Fa --I No is this Sampling Pohn wlthln a Wetland? ® Yes No Hydric Softs Pceserd? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes LNo fit crnarks " .. - VEGETATION - Use scl1wrIific names of ntants. Trw Stratum (Plot a1xe,20 R R 1 Absolute % Dominant #Ktieator Dominance Test Worksheet Cover _ ? Slahu 1' "q, (e, / Nranber of Dominant Spacm that are 03L, FACW, or FAC: �A) 2 Total Number of [Dominant Specter. Acloas AN Straw a. {B} = TOW Gomer Percent Of iaonword species K that are 08L., FACW, or FAC_ r �j (A/B} SapikVShrub Stratum (Pkat sine 10 ft R„_) 1- 5 d Prevakow Index WartCstmxA - TOW Covermin[ 06L species x 1 - 21 3. a- FACW species X2= s FAC species X3= =Tarsi Co+w FACU species x4= UPL spades x 5 = Herb StratOen (Plot size's Q } Column totals (,q} 1. "sFly wo Prevalence Iridex = 81 A = zr 14. g -I Hydrophyfic VapabWon Indicators b' DOmirariCe test is > 50% B Prerrak nm Owls 5 3.0 ?P9+4daptations' (P supporting data in remarks or on a separate tsheet) B' Wetland NmFVasaAar Plards ' aAI Problematic HyQropirytic Vegetation ii. ' krdfcatom of hy*t boll and welland try ollogy must be = TOWT Corer L, Unbss dmhrrbed or probiernatic View SU*um lot size Vegetzbon Yes Na ❑ Prw9 = tcts} Cover GM04 in Herb StratUrn US Army Corps of Enginsars 4V351em ALlounrams� Valleys, and Coast - faterim Version SOIL .�'amnlinn Point no -7 HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydri:OM Indicators- Profila Drscrl - Describe to the depthnaedad to docuineM the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators. Dem Maft Redax Features irx:t*S Golor rnaist % Color nisi % i Lac Texture Remarks Sparsely Vegetated Concave Swfaee (88) watervmined Leaven (139) (ttILRA Z, 2.4A IL 49) dYf- - Watw--Stalned Leaves (except IMt.RA 1, 2, 4A & 48) (89) Drainage Patterns (B1 D) SaLm ion (A3) ❑ San Cnist (B11) Dry-Sea`ian Water Table (C2) 'Type: C=Con=tration, D=Depletion, RM --Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains '2Loe PL=Pore Uning. M=Uattix c Soil Indltators: (AppHrab)e to all LltRs Irn)rirs ouwwisa noted) Indicators: for Problernagc Hydric Sails C3 Histosol (At) FM Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2cm Murk (At0) fpshC l pipadon (A2) FM StriPPW Matrix (S6) rM Red Parent Material (TF2) Btadi Histic (A3) ❑ Loarrry Mudcji Moral (Ft) (ezcgrt ULRA 1) F-0-1 Other (explain in rem8ries) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172) rw ❑ Depleted Sekwr Dalai Swim (A11) Depleted MEW (F3) Thick. Dark Surface (Al2) RW= Dark Surface (FB) ' indicators of hydrop-Wtic vegetation and wetland hydro!IM must Sandy MUCKY tiGneral (51) Depleiad bark Solace (F7) be present, unless disturbed or problemadc Sandy Gk7ed Matruu (54) Redox Dapiesskxis (F8) RestrictivB Laver (If Dresaim: Rab ad Ant Mounds (D6) [LRR A) Type: - - Y� Hydric soon pnsarit? No Depth (inches): intndation Visible on A94W Quiet, (e wn in rernartcq) Rlmarrrr h/ t� `. 5 6 % en "C der -S HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydri:OM Indicators- PrOmwMatatom (mir mnum of ane required Sebe* aW that apply)- Secandwy Ind calm (2 or more m9aftd): Surface vratrx (Al) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Swfaee (88) watervmined Leaven (139) (ttILRA Z, 2.4A IL 49) High Wafer Table (A2) Watw--Stalned Leaves (except IMt.RA 1, 2, 4A & 48) (89) Drainage Patterns (B1 D) SaLm ion (A3) ❑ San Cnist (B11) Dry-Sea`ian Water Table (C2) Waiter Marks (81) Aquatic knartebrates (B19) Sattratipn Visible an Aero hriagery (C9) Sediment Deposits (132) Hydr nw Sutfrds Odor (Ci) Geornprphic Position (02) Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Mki&d along LWing Roofs (C3) Shalkyw Aquftim (D3) Algal AM or Crust (54) Presence of Reduced hon (C4) FAC44WY ffi Test (D5) ken iJeposils ($5) Reperrt Iron Reduction in Tilled Sails (CO) Rab ad Ant Mounds (D6) [LRR A) Sufrce Sop Cram (B6) Shorted or Stressed Plaits (lot) (LRR A) Frost Heatie Hummocks intndation Visible on A94W Quiet, (e wn in rernartcq) Imagery (fm Field boas 8tutate Water Present? = Yesdo Water Table Present? Yea Depthpn): No Depth Cin): 7 Zd Yes ❑ ND Sahration Present? Yes Na Depth (in): 7Z6 Ykill nd thd+oIaW pM.47 (includes rapplary froige) lPtxAs, prw ous irmper�orss), if avaiabte: Dewft Recorded Data (steam gauge, mpniivring 40"k 8eri/al.P y% a,4z ! Remarks � ,e � ILS Army Corprr of Erorwers Wesfem Uxwfakm Va4e1+s, and Goasi-1Merirn Verwin WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM Western Mourftim Valle,", and Coast Supplement to the IW7 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual pmied` Site- Hawks Landing, Crowne Plam Hotel �AWkti*Owner H. -As Landing, L.LC Sampling Date. 4MM Sampling Point: DP -3 Pat/Oscadjerorny T., City/County' RentonXing TOww*, RwW S29 T24N R5E State: WA ih�lslope, terrace, etc) q SkM. Localreties (coixave, convex, none}'ca Subregion (LRR) A Lat 47.5338Lo%-122-794$7 Datum Map Unit Name No, Norma NW dassNkAfica: None Uiogicconditions on the aft V" ftr this VM 01 Year? X Yes No Ai*'Namocircums� pv(tr-, Main serAanthestie? Yes EM No --Fmft) Am Vegetaikm 10. $W, [1, or HOrok% 0 Worde-Ay dWarbed? No Aie VW4000 0. W. 0. of HydmkW El m*raft pnoWemak? No (N needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) N ap showing umpling pobt kKations, barmxft, Impor rgt*Wmnw ta , &tr ❑ yycass % No NO In this Sampling Point **Wn a wetiand? Yes [a NO ❑ Yes Ljgj No rwrt 9ftwtum {Piot vita 5 R R 3. 4. size mu in Herb SVaUffn LIS Army Carps Df Engineers Prevalence Index = B I A = Hydrophyfic YIndicators tog is > 50% I -Prevawnce *d is& 3.0 , UWpho4k* Adaphd—w -Ppcnrtg data in remarks or on a separate sheet) VVeftnd Non -Vascular Ftwft I PmWwn= HWqft1c Vegetation - (spim) bwllcatots of hydric sod and wanmW PrArokVy must be prawr� Uniess amhubw or Hydrophytk Vogetxbw pnoew Yes 0 No W"em M-uvains, Valleys. and Coast - late= vwmn —VtUt fAr1UN — USS sckKvUft names of Absokft % Dominam lr&#=W Dominance Test Worksheet 4) cow Species? status Number or Doa*aM Species that are OBE. FAGW. or FAC,. S. (A) 4. TOW Number of Cloy kmnt Spades Across AN SVaW� 0 (8) PWOM or 6�w spe�� CM that are M FAGW. or FAC- (AM) SWIW961vub Sbaftsm {Plot size j2Lft P.Wraum" Index Worksheet OBL species X I FACW species x2= FAC p." x3= Tow Cover- FACU species x4z UK species rwrt 9ftwtum {Piot vita 5 R R 3. 4. size mu in Herb SVaUffn LIS Army Carps Df Engineers Prevalence Index = B I A = Hydrophyfic YIndicators tog is > 50% I -Prevawnce *d is& 3.0 , UWpho4k* Adaphd—w -Ppcnrtg data in remarks or on a separate sheet) VVeftnd Non -Vascular Ftwft I PmWwn= HWqft1c Vegetation - (spim) bwllcatots of hydric sod and wanmW PrArokVy must be prawr� Uniess amhubw or Hydrophytk Vogetxbw pnoew Yes 0 No W"em M-uvains, Valleys. and Coast - late= vwmn SOIL Samna Point DP -3 HYDROLOGY Wedelnd HydrokW trKlIcatm: PrOhIG (Do&cYlbe to the depth Irraedad to docurnewd V* Indicator or oorr�rrrr Ow absence of hW DeW UahU Redox Feadures SUftWvomer (A1) rctdleS Color (Moist) % color tmoist ) I % T Loe Tejmre Remarks High Water Table (A2) Water -Stained LW%ICS (ftXC&W ULFA 1, 2, AA d 4B) (138) A:Yr- .9/s 40k Q2E�� elk Salt Crum (s11) Dry-Saason Water Table (G2) waw Marks (01) iAquatic Irwerlelvates (813) Separation VmbW M on Aerial trna(C9) Sediment Deposita (B2) HoDgen SUNkle Odor (CI) 'Type: C=Concenhtbon. D --depletion, FWReduced Matrix, CS--C4rwered or Coated Sand Grains 2I.= pl_rmPore Urun, M=MatnK m . ric Soil Indicabm: (Applicable UP all ❑ HiShnd (AI) offmrwise eroded.) Sandy Red= (SS) &WkztDm Ilor PrDWmnx& Hydric Soft' 20m Muck (AID) HL%k EK -don (A2) 0 swapped Matix Red Parent Lw --g (TF2) B" Hesbc LOMW N" WwW (F1) (=D* MRA 1) FM 00w (am;Aam In mnaft) Rorogen SuMda (A4) ❑ Lo" Gieyad Wkitrix (F2) FM ❑ DepWod Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Depwad MU" (F3) 51mbd or Stlessed PW* (01) (1" A) Thk* Da* Surface (Al2) &andy MAY MinenW (51 } Redac Dark Suface (FB) EJ Depideti Dark Surface (F7) 3 IndcaM of *kuptrytic vegetation and wtand *IrobW must be present; unless distirbed or Woblernabc SWdy GWVW Mat& (34) El Redox Depressions (F8) tmdgwy (BT) RestrkAlve Laver (K orewl): Type. H"ric VA promad? yes No Depth (inchas): No Depth (m): r I No Depth (.): WdWndHydnAoWPrwwW? Remarks: ate 1 4r Sat"abon Present? Yes HYDROLOGY Wedelnd HydrokW trKlIcatm: Prkrary IfKkatum of one required' 0",*. aff OW appy): se=xiw Indicators JZ or more mqukedj: SUftWvomer (A1) Sp-sely Vagelviled C— W%" VMWtoured 1-83vets (139) MLRA 1, Z 4A A 413) High Water Table (A2) Water -Stained LW%ICS (ftXC&W ULFA 1, 2, AA d 4B) (138) Drainage Patterns (BID)' Sab"bon (A3) U Salt Crum (s11) Dry-Saason Water Table (G2) waw Marks (01) iAquatic Irwerlelvates (813) Separation VmbW M on Aerial trna(C9) Sediment Deposita (B2) HoDgen SUNkle Odor (CI) Geomorphic Posffion (132) " DepoSft (B3) Oridmsd RhUzosphem Wong U -V Roots (C3) Sham Aquftrd (D3) Algal Mat cW Crust ¢M) Presence of Reduced #m (04) FAC -Ne" Test (D5) Iron Daposb (135) m Recent Iron Reduction I Tilled Sob (05) ftt%W Aryl Mounds (136)(! RR Al surface aw Cracks (88) 51mbd or Stlessed PW* (01) (1" A) Frost -Heave Hummocks hxnxktKm V%Wbia an Aerial 00xv (explain in remarks) tmdgwy (BT) Field Obsiervatkow Surface Water Present? r-ff--1 yes Water Table Present? F= yes No Depth (m): r I No Depth (.): WdWndHydnAoWPrwwW? Sat"abon Present? Yes No Depth (in),- (Ircluclai capillary MW) Dwaine Recorded data (screw gauge M0lelDnAg well, asnad phabs. pwom inspections), Ir available: US An"Y Carps of EVkmm WOMM 140antam Valleys. and Coast - kilem V&3jw WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM Western Mountairts, Valleys, and Coast Supplement to the 1W7 COE Waifands Delineation Manual Project Site: hawks Landing, Crowne Plaza motel Sampling Date: VaM9 ApplicantOwner. hawks Landing, LLC Sampling Point: DP -4 Investigator-, PatfOscarlieromy City1county: Renton/Kin Sermon, TownsNp. Range: S29 T24N RSE State: WA Landform (hiHglPpe, terrace, etc) > Slope N Z Local re]W (concave, convex, none) 5ubregiarr (tRR) A Lot 47.5338 Long —122.19487 DaRlm Sag Map Uek Name No, Na ma N Wf dassiixation: None Are elfmatic1hydrolo& oonditkwm an the srlo 40cal for ttas time of yearsX Yes do (if no, ex0ain m rernaft.) ArB'Mlormal Cir�msharxxs' pn enl on the ettc? X Yes NO 3. 4. Are Vegetation ❑, Soil, ❑, or Hydrology 0 sigrYfiratutly dis4abed? No Tatai Number of Dominant Species Across AN Strata: Are VegeWon E3. Soil. ❑. or Hydrology E3 nabrally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SLiMMARY OF FU"NGS — Attach site zbDM!Nzarnp1hV point locatlom, trlrtsects, im nt E�aaarres, etc. ftydrophybr Vegetation Present? Yes [M No Is this Sampling Point wNhin a VVetland? ® Yes lxkNo Hydric Soils Present? Yes I�j, No Wetland HydmkW Present? Yes L No Remarks: . W=r-=rATSArd — i ka -f Annoc ?nee Shatum (Piot size- 20 ft R 3 Absolute % Dominant lndleaw Dominance Test Worksheat Cover? Status y. E ; 'e r - Number of Dominant Species 2. aLtjB " that we OBI, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 3. 4. Tatai Number of Dominant Species Across AN Strata: (�? =Tad Corer PWCW of Domf wd Species ar/ that e OBL, FACW, or FAC: / (Arg) 5"6M Shrub Shrum (Plot size 32ft R_) t. Prevah"M index Workstm et 2 7ul�ld, olv try 3 QBL species x t = 4. FACW speoas x2= 5. FAC apaoes X3= = Tatl Covw FACU spades x4= UPL eparies X5= Herb Stratum (Piot size 5 R R ) Column tatals {A) B I. Prevalence index = B 1 A = 9. 4, Hydr000c Vageft0m Ind a3tors 5. aornlnartce test is � W% 6. Prevalence testis S 3.0 7. Mo owkgkal Adaptatlons ' (provide supporting 8. data in reffa t[s or on a separate **at) 9. Welland NarWaewier PWwft ' Pmbbmatic HydrophySc Vegetation ' (axatain) 14. = TOW Cavia ' Indicators of hydric soli and wetland hymvlogy must be unkma daftxbed a 1/hw ab-Aki n plot 30e Womor/ft Ve"don Yes No 0 = TOW Cover Presew A" Grand in Herb Stratum f ftolL4.� .Cr 1l�A . L )GCQd L,#i?�r9c US Army Corps dEngrneerS Wiest --m Mountains. Valleys, and Coesi—fntarim Versw Sarnnlinn Poiret nP-! uvnQni rrry Wetland HydmloW k"ca ars: Profile p2FAppon., Describe to the depffi needed to document the lndkxbcw or confirm the absence of Indicators. Depth Matrix Redox Features an Me apply): orches Color mast % Color Maki % Type,Texture RErnarks SPataeFY Vegetated Concave Surk" (Be) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (NILM 1, 2,4A & 46) 14 Y�L 111Z 7AP 1- fl jer yii. 2-f Drainage Pattern (610) &aftm6on (Al) 78 SUN Crust (611) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) WaterMarks (Bt) 'Type: G=Concentration, D=Depletion, RW=Redueed Matrix, CS=Coverad of Coated Sand Grains 2Loc: PL=Pare Lining. M4dabb( ric SO Indicator=: (,4p table to all ttnteraa otlea wbe not6d.) Indicators for PrubleAilrtfc Hydric Solle p Hlstosa (Al) Sandy Redox (SS) F D 2CM Muds (A10) HWi& Epipedon (A2) Shipped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (iF2) Black Histie (A3) Loamy lMurdky lulneral ¢1) lerecept J1At.RA 1) fl Other (explain in rerrrarks} Hydrogen SuMe (A4) Loany Glued Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dario Surface (Al 1) Depl4ed Matrix (F3) Pk Dark SwIsce (Al2) k Redox Surface (R) s Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wettarrd hyd"Al y must Sandy Mucky Nnard (S1) Q Depleted Dark Surliace (F7) be present, unless di&Wrbad or pnoblamade Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Dapresslon5 (F8) Frost Heave HUMaKdM Restrirfive Laver {if Dreserntl: Type: tranxialion Visions on Aerial Yes —W Hydric seta ? Depth finches): #nag" uvnQni rrry Wetland HydmloW k"ca ars: Frdmwy lndk etors (rrarrorrtum vi one legated: afredr an Me apply): Secomfivy Irdicatars (2 or more rm7uke j.. Surface water (Al) SPataeFY Vegetated Concave Surk" (Be) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (NILM 1, 2,4A & 46) High Water Tabic (A2) Water-fthvd Laaves (except tMLRA 1, 2, 4A a 46) (69) Drainage Pattern (610) &aftm6on (Al) 78 SUN Crust (611) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) WaterMarks (Bt) Aquatic invertebrates (B13) Sakxabw Vmble on Aerial Unagery (C9) $wiener Depoaita (62) Hydrogen Sutfde Odor (Cl) Go-vrphic Postfion (D2) Dd t Deposits (W) ❑ Oiddired RhlaoWwes alor►Q Living Roods (C3) ShallowAquimrd (D3} Algal Met or Crust (64) Presence of Reduced Iron (G4) FACS Test (OS) Inn Depoeit (B5) Recent Iron Reduction In- illed Soils (CS) Raised Ant Mounds (DB) (L.RR A) Surface Soil Crdck3 (06) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Frost Heave HUMaKdM tranxialion Visions on Aerial o Other (a*ainn in rernadks) #nag" Fleld Observatimm Surtam Water Present? FITI YesNo Werner Table Present? Yes Depth (in)- No Dam (in): Welland Prowerd? Yes p Saturation Present? Yen No Depth fin): (�� �) Describe Recorded Qata (stremn gauge. rerarilding vied, aerial pholos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Caps of--rViO rS Whstam il6oerttaars, valleys, and Coast-- kderan version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM Y, Wastem Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Supplement.fo the 1987 COP Wetlands Delineation Manual 4.fjks7Landing. Crowne Plaza HOWSampling Date: M8/09 hawks Landing, LLC Sampling Point: IJP -5 " at/OscarlJeron►y City/County: Renton/lOng Teawrrship Range _ S24 T24N RSE State: WA Umdkwm (h flsfope. terrace, etc) Slope (96 ) Loca! relief (caxave. convex, nine) tragion (5i -M A Lat 47.5338 Long -122A9487 I Datum bom No SW'Ai3p Unit Flame No. Norma NVVI dassUMane Are dimabo%drolo o mnd15ons on the sfte lypk of for aria time of year? I % I Yes ❑ No (if ao, -03n irl remarks.) flit •Nwnw Circumsigrr present on the site? I x I Yes No Vejleta w ❑. 505. E], or Hydrology 0 i+ Ay dWwt ed7 No �) AW Are Veyeta66n ©. SoS. ©. or Hyclroim ❑ neh-Hy prahlerna1c7 No (If needed, explain any aurajmz in Remarks.) H),drc0wW Vegetation Pftsent?Yes No is thts Sampling Pokrd within a Weiland? Q Yes [No Hydric SolaPmswV FM Yea No 1!&*arW+"r0kw Present? Yes No VEGETATIOfY list schwMNe names of nlants. True Sde wm (Plot size 20 ft R ) r Absofute 4 Dominant Cover ? lr4kaW Status Dorninanee Test Worksheet t w`)?dl-S Ae rL — 19b rag &U dumber d Dominant Species Ciel are QBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) .2 3. - Total Number of Dominant Speow Ac mss Al 5trsta: �) 4- SaplingMbmb Sbrr (Plot aize 10 ft R_} Percent of Doretrat Spears that are 08L. FACW, or FAC: - - (AM) t Prevalence Index WodastmW % of fM - ¢fir 088 spades X1= zTotal 3- 4. FACW speaes x2= 5. FAC species X3= Herb SWatum (Pkk size 5 tt R } / = Totrl cover FACU species x4= UPL species X5= Column fo"S (A) 8 1. Prevaienae Index= B!A 2 3. 5. Hydr9phyfic Vegativika lndiceton; 5. _ Domirrarrce tet is a 50% e- P mveka= fast 1s:5 3.0 - 7 Momhoksicsl Ada lions' (provide sLgxwfrrg dela in remarks or on a aeparak sheet) 8. 9. We land Mon -vascular Pwft f 0- Pmblemafic Hy&ophybe Vegelai- • (explain) 17. ' IndicaiOre of hydro soil and wafiand hydmiogy must be present urdess disturbed orpubknubc Woody VIEW Shuhns size = Toter Cover Hydr°phyfic vegaudlOn Yes ❑ No Present? 1, 2. - Totel Corer % Bare Ground In Herb SUsfurn US"Corps atEnWrmem Westem Mourdmas. Ve*ys, and Coast - lrtarrrn Version SOIL sampling Poing DP -5 Prattle DW : Deecflbe to the depth needed to document the lndkator or confirm the absence of lndieatvrs. Depth Matrix Redox Features Secarxiary Mdreatarb (2 or more raquked): finches) Color(moist) % Color mast % T Loe Texture Remarks ,. � �' Drainage Pso ms (BID) Saturd ion (A3) Sali Cruel (Bi 1) Dry -Season, Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Aquatic klvarlebrales (013) Saturation Vkd to on Aerial Imagery (C9) Sedtrnent Depaaft (a2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Geomorphic Position (D2) WE Deposits (B3) Qdawd Rltlzasptteres akrrg ilvrg Rods (G3) Shallow Amid (D3) 'Type: C=Coneentra5on, O=13epletion, RM --Reduced Matrix, CS --Covered of Goaded Sand Grains 'Loc: PL=Pare Lining. M=Mabu Solt hxftatars: (Applicable to all oEherwrl" noted.) Irlditaiom for Problematic Hydric Sousa HWO W (At) © Sandy Redox (55) Ful Zan Muds (Al 0) }tom Eopadon (A2) Stripped Matrix (SET) FO I Red Parent 1~ilaierial (TF2) (flack Histic (A3) Loamy Micky Mineral (F1) (except ML I A 1) rM Other (e *in in remarks) Hydrogen SWpde (A4) Loamy Gleyed M&k (172) Field Observations Surfarx Water Present? YesNo Water Table Present? Yes Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleied MMM x (F3) Pre""t? Yes ❑ No Thick Dark Surface (Al2)© Redox Dark Surface (Fe) ' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and vrelland hydrology must Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) Depleted, I]ark'Sxrface (FT) be present, unless disturbed or problematic Sandy Gleyed Maft (S4) Redox Depressions (FS) De=ft Recar�Qgft {stream gauge; monitoring YmK. aerial photos, previous inspections). 9avaitabe: Restrictive laver Of oresentl: Type; 9 Yes ❑ No Remarks. Hydric :coil ice? Depth (rrxhes)� �:r rrc- sv� if3 ir��G't'S �r� fit �I�C•Z'� tivrloni ew_v Wetland Nydrology trKftoators: Primarybuncatars (rrrinimum of one required- aheak aN i9lrat apply): Secarxiary Mdreatarb (2 or more raquked): Surface *voter (Al) SpW3* Vegetated Concave Surface Me) Waber.SEained Leaves (B9) W RA 1, Z. 4A i 45) High Water Table 02) WatexSt*wed Leaves (except W -RA 1, 2,4A & 413) (B9) Drainage Pso ms (BID) Saturd ion (A3) Sali Cruel (Bi 1) Dry -Season, Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Aquatic klvarlebrales (013) Saturation Vkd to on Aerial Imagery (C9) Sedtrnent Depaaft (a2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Geomorphic Position (D2) WE Deposits (B3) Qdawd Rltlzasptteres akrrg ilvrg Rods (G3) Shallow Amid (D3) Aigel Mat or Cnrst (84) ❑ Presence of Reduced iron (Lit) FAC46n rel Test (W Iron Deposits (B5) Recent I= Reduction In Tiled Soils (C6) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) "M A) F+trfare Sol Cradm (136) Stumtod or St m%ad Plains (01) (LM A) Frost -Heave lixn vnodss Inundation Visile an Aerial Olher(ei(Plain in remarks} knagery (87) Field Observations Surfarx Water Present? YesNo Water Table Present? Yes .. Depth (in): i`io Depth (sn)� tilledw Pre""t? Yes ❑ No Saturation Present? Yes 11 NO Depth (in): � (includes capillary 5irge) De=ft Recar�Qgft {stream gauge; monitoring YmK. aerial photos, previous inspections). 9avaitabe: 9 Remarks. US Army Corps of Erigumm Wrstem IkounteilM VaMeyS, and Coast— Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM Wesbem Moarttains, Valleys, and Coast SupPlemerd to the 1987 COE Wetlands Duration Manual R Hyd'op W Vegetation Present? ut YesNo Is thio Sampff V Pok within a Wed"? E)� Yes ® No tydfic Soils Pre®arl? rW1 Yes � No re yiVepgnd Hy&oiow Pwv ® Yes NO Remarks: ( i1 %j�CC ii C:. �DC� ' ✓ r I : i(cr '�r;:n/", /tJTG`� .it 1fEGEl Al1l�ll – lJse —i—N iC names Of ninnis "Tris Stratum (Plot size 24) It R - _ Absolute % Cover Dominant kKhcaw ? Status Dominance Test Worksheet 1. Nrxntar of Dominant Speaes that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2 a Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (g) 4. - Sa04>tgf8lrrub Stratum (Pini size 10—it R_) = Tafel Corer Penxnt of Darninant Spe mes G PW ale OBL, FAC W, or FAC: 1. gf- A n Preralenee index Wcdush est T cA MumRH by O$L species x 1 - 2. tr g s. FAGW sp Kms x2= .-5. FAC spectres x3= Herb Stratum (Pl)t size L" ) = Tatd Cover FACU spades x4= UPL species X5= Caturrm tot& (A) 8 1. Prevalence index = 8 / A = 2. 9- #Hydrophytic yagetaldion Incricators 3: Donimr0e bwo is), 50% � PieVBiBl1Ce lest is s 9-i} 7. Moro-bgicW AdM**Dn$' (W-ide supporting data in renvwks or on a s sheet) 8. g Wetland Non-Vasadar PIKrft ' ►0 Pmblenlatc Hy&oph& Vegetation ' (eWlain) 11, • indicators of tgdric sou and wetland hWrniogy must be unless dmbxbed or ProbleauRic Villoaft Mina SbWxm size = ToW Cover F ffifta yhie Veg.Ub ft Yes �Q No0 P"Isew / 2 = Toter Cover iafotsld in Herb StrahimZQ " U Liv Army Carps of Engineers Western Moumms, Vsheys, and Coast - Weam Version SOIL F19 Point DP -6 Remari� - `Type•. C=Concentration, D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2LOC: PL --Porn Lmft, M--vj ix Sail Indicators: (AppfkaWe to all LRRs, unFess oUmrwhe noted-) traditators for Prat t Hydric Softs' Hmtwa (A1) Sandy. Redox (S5} FM 2rm Muds (AID) ❑ Hie6c Fpipedon (A2) ❑ I Stripped Ma lrix (S6) r ❑ I Red Parent Matorial (TF2) Btadk Histic (A3) Loam Mudry Mu*Ml.(F1) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Olher (explain in remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed M*tK (F2) Sall Crust (811) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F8) s Wits ors of hydrophor vegetation and wetland hydrabgy rnxtst qtr Mucky Mineral (S 1) Depleted lurk Surface (F7) be present, unless disturhed or problematic Sandy Gleyed Matix (S4) Redcar Deprassims (Fe) Hydrogen Suttide Odor (C1) Restrictive Laver fif omserAI7 TYf� Yes Otddt W RhLeospheres along L.wk g Roots (C3) Hydfic salt pnm3ntY Depth (incites). Preeauxc of Redrx:Bd tion (C4) Iron Deposits (B5) VVWand Hydrology Indicators: Pm—Y Indirakvs (msrktaum of one required dreclr as bw appi ) Swface war (Al) WaterStained LmrvBs (B4) (YL RA 1, Z, 414 &AB) Sparsely VegeUkted Concave surface (EM h Water Table (A2) D Wa6sfStained Leaves (except YLRA 1, $ 4A A 411) (139) Saturation (A3} Satutabm VWWa on Aerial frtragery (Ce) Sall Crust (811) water matt (61) Aquatic Invrrrtbbrdtes (613) Sediment Deposit (82) FAGMautW Test (DS) Hydrogen Suttide Odor (C1) Drift Deposits (53) f4atsW Ant IVtourrds (D8) p -RR A) Hummocks Otddt W RhLeospheres along L.wk g Roots (C3) Algal int or Crust (64) ❑ Preeauxc of Redrx:Bd tion (C4) Iron Deposits (B5) Receni iron Reduction in Tllled Sails (08) Surface SOH Cracks (Rs) Stunted or strassed Plants (Dt) (Lm A) mmdation Vmibie on Aerial cher (wplain in ne mrks) Imagery (B7) Surface Water Present? © Yes No Depth (m): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth Cm}: $ eJ lft 9%ww HYdmkw Pi *wv Yes No ❑ Sat raOw Present? Yes M No Depth {ndudes capamy image) Describe Rgporded Data (strearm pause, rnorirt &Q well, aerial photom previous inspeckams), Ef available: Renrerirs. 11 fe ��,t � f 3��,f� i��+� -{�, 1�971.�1.�''?�� k�'�![•!l�;r,� ��� �`-�'..12 �c�7� , US Amry Corps of 8rptn fs IAAmiem AfouaMins, Valleys. and Coe&– Interim Vmwm Secondary frrdkarafs (2 or more reqused)- ` WaterStained LmrvBs (B4) (YL RA 1, Z, 414 &AB) Drainage Patterns (BID) Dryseason Water Table (C2) Satutabm VWWa on Aerial frtragery (Ce) Geomorphic Position (D2) Shallow Aquitmd (03) FAGMautW Test (DS) f4atsW Ant IVtourrds (D8) p -RR A) Hummocks Fnwt-Heave Surface Water Present? © Yes No Depth (m): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth Cm}: $ eJ lft 9%ww HYdmkw Pi *wv Yes No ❑ Sat raOw Present? Yes M No Depth {ndudes capamy image) Describe Rgporded Data (strearm pause, rnorirt &Q well, aerial photom previous inspeckams), Ef available: Renrerirs. 11 fe ��,t � f 3��,f� i��+� -{�, 1�971.�1.�''?�� k�'�![•!l�;r,� ��� �`-�'..12 �c�7� , US Amry Corps of 8rptn fs IAAmiem AfouaMins, Valleys. and Coe&– Interim Vmwm WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM Western Nountalins, Valleys, and Coast Supplement to the 1937 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual Hawks I-aixiing, Cruwne Plaza Hotel Sampling Date: 41)�gM XHawks-Land ing, LLC Sampling Point: DP -7 Pavoscadjemmy City/County: RenWn/King Raw. 529 T24N R5E Slate: WA • . Etc) Skpe 71 Local MAO (COMM. cornea, none) r Lory -122.19487 Datum p Norma NM ckm5ftaton: None =Kffllions on the site typic for to time of year? yes X (If no. explain in ramaft.) pnment on ffm site? X yes Ho Species Aayss AN Strata: 5— TXW.11, or Hydrokw 0 sOAcantty &*xbed? No Solt. 0, or HydmkW C3 naUravy proWeawk? No (if rKxxW, explain any answers in Rernaft,) F;FMWW -Attach sft wuwp Pfc---env went? - Use scientific nwnes a YesNo Is this Sampling Point within s Vfttland? Q Yes MNa Y., No 1yes No M M Size 20 It R f Absolute % Dominant InCIK2AW Dominance Test Worksheet Cover Species? Status nlMna -92 FjJf_-, Number of Donvirwl Species 71 -at me OBL, FACW, or FAG-. (A) A Total Nwtw of Dominant Species Aayss AN Strata: 5— (B) TOW Q4"W Percent of DmftkrA spacm Mat mL- OBL- FACW, of FAC: SqAnUrShnih stratum (plot size JLft R__j 90 PrwaIenc*JWex WwWjget Towl % CMW 57 t, , L L Of OBL SPEOM Xj= FACW species K2= FAC species x3m =T �Ccl— FACE/ specks x4w UPL species FNM (Pk;t size 5 fl R Column totals (A) � 2. Prevalerm Index = B I A A tiv?4flis Hydrophyfic yGq!!!q!on Indicators 41Aiz"A.41e- I Donmance test K > 50% MorNVM*W AdaplatiM (PFOViCIP- SUPPOV rb dala in Fwnaft CW on a separate *MW) Welland Mor-Vesctftr Plards iirk Pradernatic HydrWtr Vagi ab- * (eViain) Total &nw Indicators of hydric sal and wetland hydrok)gy must be F5,Pressrr� unless disturbed or orobkqnatr, UW�00MWNbo SnOm Plot size Hydrophytic Vegebow TCUO cow yes Na 0 in harb.Stratum faS ecA US Army CarpS of Engineers Wastim Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Jalwm Version SOIL Samrljin Pint n13_7 WMFU1UrV11V YVetland Hyrlrplogy indicators: PraKra+y lrrdicafors (mm>imerm of ane rayukud: Snatace water (Al) High water Table (A2) Sahaatim (A3) Water Merles (131) Sediment Deposits (B2) DrM mite (83) Algal Mat or (trust (64) iron Oepasits (85)Recent Surface Safi Cradrs (66) Inurrdadon Vmlbfe on Aerial Imagery (67) d Profile(Describe to the needed to diocumerrt the bodkm or or confirm the absence of fndlr&torurs. Depth faabix Redox 1=eaUtres 1 tn&— Color moist % CNor moist % Type, LAc Texhxe Remarks .. p ^ -- ; flydrpiogy PresenR7 Yuss © Na �r Degribe Recoirded (sbmm well. aerial Mobs. previous in$peafions), it available: Rerrnartcs; `'' � �! rtey,' tri}�LU,�"f 4 a.1, lk-147w 'Type: C--C-onoentration, RDepleiion, RW -Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Loc: PL=Pore lining, M=Uatrix Solt Indicators: (Il tabic to aft LRRs unless otlrerwise noted.) ❑ HWosoi (Al) Sandy Redox (SS) (ndleators for Problematic Hydric Sails' 2cm Muck (Al 0) HlSt u t=pipedon (A2) C] 96Ck }listiC (A3} Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stripped Mafrbr (S6) F -0--j Red Parent Material (TF2) Loamy Ir4trt9cy Mineral (FI) (except KLRA ?)❑ QUKx (explain M remarks} ❑ Loamy Gleyed Makin (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Thick Clark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky J♦ilin)eral (S1) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Mat- (S4) Depleted I+Matritr (F9) Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (Fa) Indicators of hydr Whybc vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, urdess disturbed or problematic Restrictive Laurer (If presents: Type Hydric soil prownt? Yes 0 No Depth (Indies): Rernarlrs 1�LL�9i �° 3i"' L 3901 CQ_ L}:.± ave 0"4 WMFU1UrV11V YVetland Hyrlrplogy indicators: PraKra+y lrrdicafors (mm>imerm of ane rayukud: Snatace water (Al) High water Table (A2) Sahaatim (A3) Water Merles (131) Sediment Deposits (B2) DrM mite (83) Algal Mat or (trust (64) iron Oepasits (85)Recent Surface Safi Cradrs (66) Inurrdadon Vmlbfe on Aerial Imagery (67) d ck ad fhaf app66 Secondary 1ndkatws (2 or more rWu#9d): spersety Vepetaled Cormawe Surface (B8) Water -Stained Leaves (69) (MLRA 1, 2,4A <B) Water -Stained Leaves (—q*MLRA 1, 2.4A 34B),(89) Ordirrage Pattems (614) Saft Crust (611) Dr amnion Wafer Tabie (C2) A*Mft lnvertebra6es (613) Saturation Visible an Aerialna I �Y (C9) Hrkoaen SuMde Odor (Ci) Geomorphic Ppsi W (132) omdlaed Rhttospheles along Living Rants (C3) Stralbw Aqudard (D3) Presence of Reduced hon (G4) FAC•►k%" Test (G3} iron Reduction in Tilted Soil (C:6) Raised Ard Mounds (DB) (L.RR A) Shariad nr Stressed Plants (131) (LM A) Fmst-Heave Hummocks 0#- (e>gJiahr in renveka) V3 1 ❑ 1 FlelrF Observations Sr 188 Water Present? Yes Water Table Present? ❑ Yom SaMmtion Present? Yes (it lodes coolery mom) No Depth (in): No Depth (in): i No Depth (i.)= 3 l� � flydrpiogy PresenR7 Yuss © Na Degribe Recoirded (sbmm well. aerial Mobs. previous in$peafions), it available: Rerrnartcs; `'' � �! rtey,' tri}�LU,�"f 4 a.1, lk-147w US Amry Corps ofErngmeers Ktsfem lliountakrs. Vaseys, and Coast- kftrim Version � f 'z IAIETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Suppiement to me " <r 7487 COE Wands Delineation manual SIIe Heft Landing, Cowre Plaza hotel Sampling Date: r. Hawks l andira LLC SampIN Point_ 6t5 Patioscadjerom CitylCounty: Renton/Kin .:529 T24N R5E State: WA a� . �. P�- slope NLocal relief (carm.�ve, corruex, nave} t�cr C A Lt47-5338 Lang —122-19487 Datum 7Yarne Flo NOrrt a . NIM dass4cabon: None cvKF"-U oas on Um site typrtal:(or this lima of yeat7 x Yes 11 No (ff no, explain in remarks.) Commistaieces" ptesant on the site?; x Yes 0 No 7' Sp11 G.`ar.lfY*01Q9Y © s+6 Mr dist utredT No -40o4413 nalurany prp6Eemaw? No (If needed, explain wV answers in Remarks.) t PINMNGS - AVACfl site imp shuaing Sampling nt l[tcatians, transacts, ire features, stc. ...., k t11 `� 4 i P/e PreserrY+ YYes FMN0 es No 1a Famptiny Pohat within a t+Yetland? � Yes I L 10 - Prarew Yes No r 1 Lhe� A174N Use,ZCkW MC manes:nf niarMs. lit s'tl rii (Piot sizeb�Absolute % Dominant Indicate Danlrsance %lyd Worksheet _" a fiPV2.r- . - pec-es'? Sidb15 Number of Dominant Species -� that aret78L, FACW, or FAC: (Al Total Number of Dominant " s Spades A== AD Strata: (B) r `L-i Y6= Total Cm ar Percent of Doffwwrrt Spades. #wt arc DBL, FACW, or FAC. r1 4 i Imo} i SlrirLum (Piot s¢e t 0 :}l FRS � f � Prevalence Index Wexkslreai 12 Mrrltipky� 081. species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x3= w a4 r d -Tow Cover PACU x d c {Plot size 5 7t R }- spa x s = Column totals {,q} $ Pre"ler o index = 81 A = tHydro c YMOHOn Indicators i �, ildrrrtranoe lest iB � 5696 Prevakmie Dist 19i 3.0 104oWbological Adaptations " {ptuvtde supporting dalB,in remarks Or on it saparaW Shea tNeltarrd NaR-Vasrdllar Plants P-IoWnabc Hydraphyuc Vegetation ' (axplaln) = Tore! Cover - Indl atOrs of hydric W and wettand hydrokW must be 7 unless drsbxbed or immaNnaft size = Yes No p Toter Crier Yes V U$ Amy a.A$ of Engineers Westem Mountams, Vaheys, anp Cossr - lnrerim Version S61L S-amnlin DMI"t llP_R wenand Hydmlogy Ibdiaieona: f'ranary fr xxs (raarirrrrm d lane requu ed: chexyr Surface wafer (Al) High Water Table (A2) El I Sahuation (A3) Water ( 3ft (81) Sediment Deposits (82) Drat DepDaft (t33) Algal Mat or Crust (84) Iron Dq--U (85) Surface Sail Cracks (66) inurKWon Visible on Aerial all that apArYJ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BBj Sf atw-s^takred Leaves (amept mLRA 1, 2,4A 1418) (99) Salt Crust (B11) Aquatic frnoertobrates (B13) Hydrogen Sxltfide Odor (Ci) Oxidized Rhim� akxV laving Roots (C3) Pre Once of Reduced Irm (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sols (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) (LM A) purer (explain in remark!) Seoondvy Mdicefors (2 Or mom re7uhe4 WalerStained Leaves Mg) (MLRA 1, 2,4A A 48) Dugs Patterns (610) Dry -Season Shafer Table (C2) Satcuatian Vislble on Aerial tnlagery (CO) Geomorphic Position (02) Shall—Aquiferd (03) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Raised Ant Unxmmds (D6) (LW A) FrosPioave Humnxx*s FMIG Obeervaborra Surface Wafer Present? Yee Warner Table Present? ❑ Yes Sabnation Present? Yes frndudes cvp8ary fringe) Proflls Oeacri be to the needed to document the lndicator or confirm Me absent* of indleators_ Wetland Hydroioyy Present? Yes © � O Depth Matrix Redox Features Describe Reworded Date (Stream gauge, rnoNkat M well, aerial photos, prevbus crepacbona), If available: wni es Calor mist 0 ° + Texture Remarks L/ 'Type: C=Conomtraation. D=Depletivrt, PM-Reduoed Matrix, CS=Covered or CoatBd Sand Grains 71Ac: PL =Pare Lining, Metrix Hydrk Sofl hubcoto►s: {Applicable to all Hisbaol (Al) LRPs, aeless ather'wbe noted.) FO I Sandy Redox (SS) Wicatom for Protdemefle Hydric Solis' 2cm Muck (Al 0) Hi5tic Eplpedon EllBlack His* (A3) Ell M1 Stripped Matti (SB) tnamy Mucky iulinwW (F1) {except MLRA 1) FM Red Parent Mdterial (TF2) Other (eVL& in rarnerks) Fiydnopen SuNk* (A4) loanry GleyW Matrix (F2) EM Depleted Below Dank Surface (A11) Depteied Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) © Sandy GLeyed Abroix (S4) ❑ Redox Durk Surface (F6) Depleted. Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Redox Depressions (Fa) 3 indx glom of hydrophytic vegatabon and wetland trydm;wy must be present, unless disturbed or probleni7bc kesbk*ve Laver Cd areserdl: Type: yes Hydric salt present? f lel;, 'j Depth fmes): Remarks: � ' wenand Hydmlogy Ibdiaieona: f'ranary fr xxs (raarirrrrm d lane requu ed: chexyr Surface wafer (Al) High Water Table (A2) El I Sahuation (A3) Water ( 3ft (81) Sediment Deposits (82) Drat DepDaft (t33) Algal Mat or Crust (84) Iron Dq--U (85) Surface Sail Cracks (66) inurKWon Visible on Aerial all that apArYJ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BBj Sf atw-s^takred Leaves (amept mLRA 1, 2,4A 1418) (99) Salt Crust (B11) Aquatic frnoertobrates (B13) Hydrogen Sxltfide Odor (Ci) Oxidized Rhim� akxV laving Roots (C3) Pre Once of Reduced Irm (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sols (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) (LM A) purer (explain in remark!) Seoondvy Mdicefors (2 Or mom re7uhe4 WalerStained Leaves Mg) (MLRA 1, 2,4A A 48) Dugs Patterns (610) Dry -Season Shafer Table (C2) Satcuatian Vislble on Aerial tnlagery (CO) Geomorphic Position (02) Shall—Aquiferd (03) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Raised Ant Unxmmds (D6) (LW A) FrosPioave Humnxx*s FMIG Obeervaborra Surface Wafer Present? Yee Warner Table Present? ❑ Yes Sabnation Present? Yes frndudes cvp8ary fringe) No Depth fn): ND Depth (in) �i No Depth (in): �y G! Wetland Hydroioyy Present? Yes © � O Describe Reworded Date (Stream gauge, rnoNkat M well, aerial photos, prevbus crepacbona), If available: Remarks t b US Army Corps of Engineers W03fem Moxmtams, Valleys, and Coast- fpm Version "41c� L-"`XHl5 rr G x-ayi�c>trnc, GGH:;uLTINC; 1'=r,�r,1NLEf75 MEMORANDUM TO: STEVE. LEE, BARRY BAKER & STACEY CLEAR FROM: 9VIM DOUGHERTY DATE: JUNE 16, 2010 SUBJECT: STREAM ASSESSMENT (CONSISTENT WITH RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4-5-120) FOR THE WATER MAIN INSTALLATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE HAWK'S LANDING WATER AND STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON G&O #09583 i . Stream Assessment Narrative for the proposed water main crossing of May Creek associated with the Hawk's Landing Project: May Creek is a City of Renton "Class 1 Stream" with a 25 -foot buffer requirement (Renton Municipal Code 4-3-050 Q4, personal communication with Steve Lee 6-9-2010). Buried pipelines in existing rights -of --way have no buffer requirements (RMC 4-3-90E Regulated Water Bodies). The Shoreline Designation for this reach of May Creek is "Urban" (RMC 4-3-90 Map G -3) - The Ditch along the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. adjacent to the water main project is a City of Renton "Class 5 Stream" with no regulatory restrictions for water lines. • According to the City of Renton Floodplain Map for the area, except for the very northwest corner of the site, the 100 -year flood elevation extends north from the Ordinary High Water Mark of May Creek to the fence line of the existing warehouse complex and as much as 40 feet north beyond the fence. The 100 -year flood elevation ranges from 26 to 32 feet across the site 2. Vegetation in the Project Vicinity includes_ East of the bridge along May Creek- Large big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum) 30+ inches diameter breast height (DBH), alder (Alnus 701 DexlerAuenue N., Suite 200 Seattle, Washington 98109 (206) 284-0860 Fax (206) 233-3206 June 16, 2010 Page 2 rubra) and black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera trichocarpa) dominate the overstory. Himalayan blackberries with some salmonberry and small willows dominate the understory to the east of the bridge. • North of the bridge: Grasses, dandelions, milkweed, clover, yarrow and Japanese knotweed are present along the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard are the only plant species likely to be impacted by the proposed sidewalk installation. Several small alders (approx. 4 -inches DBH) will be removed for installation of the drainage swale. Between 100 and 200 feet north of the bridge Japanese knotweed (l0 -feet tall) dominates from the road prism, and on both sides of the ditch, all the way to the warehouse. To the east trees are limited to small alders and a few cottonwoods 4 to 6 inches DBH along the fence line. The ditch draining the area to the warehouse area to the north contains some wetland grasses reeds canary grass along with a few other wet -soil plants. Iron bacteria have turned the water in the ditch orange. • Overstory includes black cottonwoods, alders and vine maples. • Other vegetation present includes nettles, (Urtica dioica), Canadian thistles (Cirsium edule), Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis) horsetail (lrquistum sp.), yarrow (flchillea sp.), alfalfa, clover and wild carrot. Riparian vegetation along May creek upstream (east) of the bridge is dominated by several age classes of red alder ranging in size from 4 inches DBH to 12 inches DBH. Willows, Japanese knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum), Himalayan blackberries (Rubus discolor), salmonberty (R. spectabifis), nettles, sword fern (Polystichum munitum), holly, horsetail, ivy, piggybacklyouth-on-age (Tolmiea men esh) and a variety of grasses are present in the understory. Knotweed is not as tall farther to the east, shaded by the large cottonwoods (28 to 30 inches DBH) to the NE about 30 feet north of the SE property corner. • There is a small mouldy wetland delineated approximately 35 feet NW of the SE property corner marker and 140 feet east of the bridge. 'Wetland vegetation is dominated by reed canarygrass (Phalaris anundinacea) and Japanese knotweed. The proposed sidewalk extension, stormwater improvements and water main installation will not impact this wetland or the associated buffers. June 16, 2410 Page 3 "C� Vegetation on the west side of the Lake Washington Boulevard ROW includes many of the same plants as the project area, with the addition of piggyback, purple loosestrife and buttercups. The bank in this area is low and within the 100 -year floodplain of May Creek according to the City of Renton Floodplain Maps. The bank steepens as May Creek curves to the north, just northeast of the SE property corner marker. 3. Ecological Functions May Creek drains approximately 8.6 miles from Lake Kathleen and receives flows from a number of named and unnamed streams and lakes including Lake Boren. While Shoreline Designation for the stream is "Urban" west of I-405, it is "Rural" upstream of 1.405 for several miles where it passes through a steep -sided valley dominated by deciduous trees with a few Douglas fir, western redcedar and other conifers. There are a few alder and cottonwood snags scattered throughout the riparian area. Wildlife in this middle portion of May Creek includes deer, coyotes, black bear, raccoons, opossums and various species of rabbits, and rodents including mice, voles, moles, chipmunks and squirrels. May Creep flows across the south end of the project area and supports transportation and rearing for most species of salmon and trout in Lake Washington. Spawning habitat for chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), coho (O. kisutch) and sockeye (O. nerka) is present upstream of 1-405. Human development limiting the habitat value of the project area includes I-405 to the east, Lake Washington Blvd. to the west, the warehouse area (future site of Hawk's Landing) to the north and residential areas to the south on the Kennydale Hill. Wildlife likely to occur on the site would be limited to species tolerant of traffic noise and human presence including deer, raccoons, opossums, squirrels, rodents, hawks and a variety of songbirds, crows etc. 4. Fish & Wildlife Birds observed during the field visit included robins, chickadees and an unidentified hawk. Other bird species likely to be present in the project area include crows, sparrows, woodpeckers, flickers, Steller's jay, and chickadees, warblers and nuthatches. A nesting platform is maintained at the old Barbee Mill Site for ospreys and bald and golden eagles are observed downstream along Lake Washington. Other raptors that could be present include red-tailed hawks, June 16, 2010 Page 4 Cooper's hawk, sharp -shinned hawk, western screech owl and the barred owl (AOA 2007, Matthews 1999). Reptiles and amphibians likely to be present in the area include garter snakes, alligator lizards, salamanders and chorus frogs. May Creek flows through the project are from east to west under the Lake Washington Boulevard Bridge. It is classified as a City of Renton Class 1 Stream with a 25 -foot buffer (RMC 4-3-90), which supports chinook, coho and sockeye salmon; steelhead are also present (WDFW Salmonscape). 5. Measures to Protect Trees: The scope of the proposed project essentially eliminates potential impacts to significant trees on the subject property, because the proposed sidewalk extension and Swale will occur along the shoulder of Lake Washington Boulevard where vegetation is limited to grasses, weeds and Japanese knotweed. The Swale proposed may impact a few small alders that are less than 4 inches DBH. The remaining trees and any on-site wetlands would not be impacted (See attached Project Site Map). • � � /� .� .A 'dam, r� ^� _ .. -iY� y :t � ttt r• s t at � � is K .� - - r� di�r A'• �,�•4; � �' '� GJ June 16, 2010 Page 7 Photo 3 - Photo looking west on left hydraulic bank of May Creek showing typical riparian vegetation and Lake Washington BIvd bridge crossing. REFERENCES Altman Oliver Associates, LLC 2007. Wildlife Habitat Assessment and Stream Review: Lake Washington View Estates, Renton, WA, Parcel 322405-908 I. Hart, J. L. 1973. Pacific Fishes of Canada, fisheries Research Board of Canada: Bulletin 180, Ottawa.. Lee, Steve 2010. Personal communication regarding Renton Municipal Code and Shoreline Master Program, June 9, 2010. Mathews, Daniel 1999. Cascade -Olympic Natural History: A Trailside ,Reference, Raven Editions, Portland, Oregon. June 16, 2410 Page S Rentoa City Code 2007. Sections 4-3-05 (Q4), 4-3-90E Shoreline Master Program Regulated Water Bodies, and 43-90 Map (G-3) website reviewed 6-10 & 11. Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife 2010. SalmonSeape Website, accessed June 9, Olympia, Washington. JDfsn OMN r 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1a 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 is 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 BEFORE THE SHORELINES HEARINGS BOARD IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON In re the appeal of Renton's Shoreline Substantial } Development Permit LUA10-041, BCM, SM, } Brad Nicholson, Petitioner, } } vs. } CITY OF RENTON, ) Respondent. ) CASE NO. SHB#10-016 RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT UNDER CR56 1. Identity of Respondent. Respondent City of Renton (hereinafter "Renton") files this Motion for Summary Judgment because there are no substantial issues of fact and because Petitioner, Brad Nicholson, has failed to state a claim justifying relief from this Board. 2. Respondent's Request. Renton respectfully requests that the Board grant its Motion for Summary Judgment because the pleadings and declarations show that there is no genuine Renton City Attorney 100 S 2n° 5t PO Box 626 ♦ ,� # Renton, WA 98457-0626 r1 Phone: (425) 430480 Fax: (425) 255-5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 5li issue as to any material fact and that Renton is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. 3. issues Presented for Review. A. Whether the Renton City Council's permit decision was inconsistent with the Renton Shoreline Master Program Design regulations §§5.03.01(D), 7.19.01(A)(1), 7.19.04(D)(1), and 7.17.02(A) and (B)? B. Whether the Renton City Council's permit decision was inconsistent with #BCW 90.58.020? C. Whether Petitioner may argue any facts or findings related to the proposed Hawk's Landing hotel development project, when he failed to exhaust his LUPA remedies and when this SHB does not have jurisdiction over that permit? D. Whether Petitioner has demonstrated standing to raise this appeal? 4. Evidence Relied Upon. A. Declaration of Mr. Steve Lee with exhibits. 1. Loke Wa. Blvd. Hawk's Landing Storm and Water Improvements Project, Figure 1 Vicinity Map by Gray & Osbourne, Inc., (hereinafter "Exhibit A"); and 2. Wetland/Stream Study: Hawk's Landing Crowne Plaza Hotel report of May 12, 2009 (hereinafter "Exhibit B"); 3. Stream Assessment (Consistent with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-120) for the Main Water Installation Associated with the Hawk's Landing Water and Storm water Improvements City of Renton, King County, Washington, by Gray & Osbourne, Inc., (hereinafter "Exhibit C'); B. Declaration of Ms. Suzanne Dale lstey with attachments: 1. 2009-2011 Grant Programs Direct -Appropriation Projects, Contract Readiness Survey, (hereinafter "Exhibit A"); and 2. Capital Agreement between: City of Renton and Public Warks Board, (hereinafter "Exhibit B"); C. Declaration of Mr. Spencer Alpert; and f (} Renton City Attorney Un :10052"d St Po Box 626 6 ♦ Renton, WA 98057-0626 1'onlon's Motion forSurnmaryJudyawia - 2/17 �Phone: 425.255.8678 Fax: 425.255.5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 D. Declaration of Ms. Vanessa Dolbee with attachments: 1. City of Renton Lake Washington Blvd Storm and Water System Improvements Neighborhood Map, by Gray & Osborne, Inc. (hereinafter "Exhibit A"); 2. City of Renton Land Use Permit Master Application, submitted by Steve Lee, City of Renton Surface Water Utility Department, received by the City of Renton Planning Division June 24, 2010 (hereinafter "Exhibit B"); 3_ Notice of Application and Proposed Determination of Non - Significance (DNS), June 24, 2010 (hereinafter "Exhibit C'); 4. Development Services Division Environmental Check List submitted by Steve Lee, June 21, 2010 (hereinafter "Exhibit D"); 5. Environmental (SEPA) Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS -M}, July 19, 2010 (hereinafter "Exhibit E"); 6. Permit for Shoreline Management- Substantial Development Permit, signed by Chip R. Vincent, August 9, 2010 (hereinafter "Exhibit F"); 7. Office of the Hearing Examiner City of Renton, Report and Decision, Fred J. Kaufman, September 10, 2009 (hereinafter "Exhibit G"); and S. Planning & Development Committee, Committee Report, approved by City Council December 7, 2009 (hereinafter "Exhibit H"). S. Statement of Facts A. Factual History: Permitted Project Renton's infrastructure improvement project for which the challenged permit was issued is located along a strip of land, roughly the width of a sidewalk, on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard, west of 1-405, and immediately south and west of an area generally referred to as the Pan Abode or "Hawk's Landing" site. (See Declaration of Mr. Steve Lee, Exhibit A, and Exhibit C, p. 4-5, and Declaration of Ms. Vanessa Dolbee, Exhibit ";,, lic)o *or )ommor d ltrdcnter;: - 3/17 r Y Renton City Attorney ZOO S 2nd St t Re Boz 626 Renton, WA 98057-0626 .t� Phone: (425) 430 -WO l'�N,rO Fax- (425) 255-5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 A). This infrastructure improvement project has generally been called the "Hawk's Landing" project, which is misleading. (See Declaration of Ms. Suzanne Dale FOey, Exhibit A, p. 3-4, 6-7; and Capital Agreement between: City of Renton and Public Works Board, Exhibit B, p. 20-21). "Hawk's Landing" more accurately refers to a proposed hotel that is not tied to Renton's permit or grant; to date, hotel construction has not begun because of a lack of financing. (See Declaration of Mr. Spencer Alpert). The State of Washington Public Works Board has granted 1.7 million dollars to Renton for its infrastructure improvement project. (See Declaration of Ms. Suzanne Dale Estey, Exhibit B, p. 22). The improvements will be made even if the Hawk's Landing Hotel is never constructed. (See Declaration of Mr. Steve Lee, p. 5, Declaration of Ms. Suzanne Dole Estey, p. 3, and Declaration of Ms. Vanessa Dolbee, p. 4). The infrastructure improvement will include as part of the new storm drainage system catch basins and a bio-swale to clean and improve the quality of water discharged into May Creek and from May Creek into Lake Washington. (See Declaration of Mr. Steve Lee, p. 5-7, and Declaration of Ms. Suzanne Dole Estey, Exhibit B, p. 20-21). B. Procedural History: Petitioner's arguments have failed On or about July 19, 2010, the Renton Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued an Environmental (SEPA) Determination of Non -Significance -Mitigated (DNS -M). (See Declaration of Ms. Vanessa Dolbee, Exhibit E). ERC found that the project "does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment" but did require minor mitigation. (See Declaration of Ms. Vanessa Dolbee, Exhibit E, p. 1). On August 9, 2010, Mr. Chip E. Vincent, the Renton Planning Director, issue Shorelines Substantial r�Y Renton City Attorney 100 S 2itl St PO Box 626 ro oo,;vn Tor 4ur7r-nry J;fei:r. :,,, 4/17 ♦ M � Renton, WA 98057-0626 Phone: (425) 430-6480 ��,�[1 Fax: (425) 255-5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 if 17 18 19 24 21 22 23 24 25 Development Permit for the infrastructure improvement. Petitioner appealed the determination to this Board. 6. Argument. In his Petition for Review, Petitioner alleges that the Renton Shoreline Substantial Development Permit decision for this project should be reversed because the decision allegedly Violates the Renton Shoreline Master Program Design regulations (hereinafter "RSMPD") and RCW 90.58.020 of the Shorelines Management Act of 1971. Each of Petitioner's allegations is untrue. Under Washington CR § 56(d), "summary judgment is appropriate if: the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Bosley, 118 Wn.2d 801, 811; 828 P.2d 549 (1992), citing Marincovich v. Tarabochla, 114 Wn.2d 271, 274; 787 P.2d 562 (1990). Because there are no genuine issues as to any material fact, this Board should find that Petitioner has failed to state a genuine issue as to a material fact, failed to demonstrate any actual damages, and grant Renton's Motion for Summary Judgment. A. Renton's permit decision was consistent with the RSMPD regulations §§5.03.01(D), 7.19.01(A)(1), 7.19.04(D)(1), 7.17.02(A) and (B). i. Renton Shoreline Master Program Design §5.04.01(D) Petitioner's first claim is that Renton's permit decision violates RSMPD §5.03.01(D). Preliminarily, there is no subsection D for §5.03.01. If he intended to cite -Y Renton Renton City Attorney 100 S 2nd St a PO Re Boz 626 s Moi!CIl for_Sumrllar .o• 111�i-f 5/17 ra Re648nton, WA 98057-0826 Phone: (425) 430-0 �r Fax: (425) 255-5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 §5.04.01(D), entitled Designation of the Urban Environment - Public Access, it states that: In this Master Program, priority is also given to planning for public visual and physical access to water in the Urban environment. Identifying needs and planning for the acquisition of urban land for permanent public access to the water in the Urban environment shall be accomplished through the Master Program. To enhance waterfront and ensure maximum public use, industrial and commercial facilities shall be designed to permit Pedestrian waterfront activities where practicabie and the various access points ought to be linked to non -motorized transportation routes such as bicycles and hiking paths (emphasis added). Petitioner intentionally altered the meaning of the last sentence in the aforementioned section by writing in his Petition for Review, "Where practicable, various access points ..., to make it appear as though the "where practicable" related to the bike and hiking paths rather than to pedestrian waterfront activities. The fact is, the project improves public use by adding a sidewalk for a better and safer view of May Creek from lake Washington Boulevard. Ironically, as noted in the Declamation of Ms. Suzanne Dale Estey, Exhibit A, p. 3-4, and 6-9, and Exhibit 8, p. 20-21, the long-term plan, adopted before Petitioner's challenges to the project, also includes the acquisition of shoreline property abutting May Creek and plans for a soft -surface trail. In sum, Renton's decision fully supports RSMPD §5.04,01(D) and the permit decision should be affirmed. ii. RSMPD §§ 7.18.01(A)(I) and fDff1j Petitioner's next claim is that Renton's permit decision violates RSMPD §§7.19.01(A)(1). Again, Petitioner cites to a non-existent section of the regulations. It appears as though Petitioner intended to cite RSMPD 01, entitled Utilities - Q Renton City Attorney 100 S 2"" St PO Box 626 r ! Dr 5 r✓rnrinrl 6/17 ~ -a + Renton, WA 98057-0626 ,t Phone. (425) 430-0480 r N; Q Fax: (425) 255-5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 s 9 to 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Landscaping -Native Vegetation, and RSMPD §7.18.04, Utilities -Local Service Utilities, Specifications. The first subsection to RSMPD §7.18.01(A) states: The native vegetation shall be maintained whenever possible. The second subsection to RSMPD §7.18.01(A) states: When utility projects are completed in the water or shoreland, the disturbed area shall be restored and landscaped as nearly as possible to the original condition, unless new landscaping is determined to be more desirable. Renton does not disagree that it must comply with theses sections. Perhaps, Petitioner fails to understand that Renton is complying with all of RSMPD §7.18.01, not just the first subsection. Under RSMPD §7.18.01(A)(1), "native vegetation shall be maintained whenever possible (italics added)." The condition "whenever possible" qualifies the requirement that native vegetation shall be maintained. That does not mean that vegetation can never be removed or replaced_ The Declaration of Mr. Steve Lee, states that at the point where the pipes are being replaced, and where the bio-swale is being installed, there is little to no native vegetation. (See Declaration of Mr. Steve Lee, p. 7, and Exhibit C, p. 1-2, and 4). What currently exist are a few generally small alders, maples and a variety of weeds and grasses. (See Declaration of Mr. Steve Lee, Exhibit C, p. 1-2, and 4)_ That wild vegetation is not a reason avoid improving water quality and water pressure in that area. Additionally, because this is a utility project, RSMPD §7.18.01(A) (2) applies. As noted above, RSM PD §7.18.01(A) (2) requires that if any native vegetation exists to be disturbed, Renton will be responsible for restoring and landscaping "as nearly as possible �' Renton City Attorney C� 100 S 2n° St Pa Box 626 ger;rf2o s tliorion for_�unirnorvl; cc�r; Fr; 7/17 + „u + Renton, WA 98057-0626 Phone: (425) 430-6480 ��NTD Fax: (425) 255-5474 I 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 to the original condition, unless new landscaping is determined to be more desirable." Renton believes that there is little to no native vegetation that will be disturbed or altered. (See Declaration of Mr. Steve Lee, Exhibit C, p. 1-2, and 4). If there is any, Renton will either restore and landscape so that the vegetation appears to be in its original condition or Renton will add more desirable landscaping to the location. Ironically, if Petitioner's position was correct, Renton could not do any utility improvements or replacements near any shoreline. Taking his argument and applying it, every location that has a bush, shrub, weed or other vegetation could not be touched. Even more ironic is the fact that Petitioner's position about vegetation is inconsistent with his position that Renton should clear a trail next to May Creek. If the Board accepted his position even to a lesser degree, Renton might be able to replace the pipes, and add a bio -Swale, but it would not be able to install the soft -surface trail that Petitioner covets. states_ iii. RSMPD § 7.18.01IOH1) As for Petitioner's other argument under RSMPD §7.18.04(D)(1), that section Discharges of pollutants into water courses and ground water shall be subject to the Department of Ecology, Carps of Engineers, and the Environmental Protection Agency for review of permits for discharge. Renton concedes that it is subject to DOE, COE, and EPA review of its permit, and could not, if it wished, avoid such review. Nonetheless, Renton's infrastructure improvement project is not adding to or exacerbating any current discharge of pollutants into water courses and ground Water. e"(3,"t; Renton City Attorney 100 S 2n° St PO Box 626 r+'er!ic n 5 rvrot10n rOt_�itrn marvjvaon--e-:t 8/17 Renton, WA 98057-0626 Phone: (425) 430-0480 Fax: (425) 255-5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 s 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Contrary to Petitioner's claim that the infrastructure project will cause additional pollution, this project will reduce the discharge of pollutants into the water courses and ground water. (See Declaration of Mr. Steve Lee, p. 5-7, and Declaration of Ms. Suzanne Dale Estey, Exhibit B, p. 20-21). Stated another way, RSMPD §7.18.04(D) (1) does not apply because Renton is not seeking to discharge additional pollutants into water courses and ground water; Renton's project will reduce drainage water pollution, by use of catch basins and a bio-swale, which will improve the quality of water being discharged into May Creek, and from May Creek into Cake Washington. (See Declaration of Mr. Steve Lee, p. 5-7, and Declaration of Ms. Suzanne Dale Estey, Exhibit B, p_ 20-21). The facts reveal that Petitioner's RSMPD §7.18.04(D) (1) claim is baseless, he is not injured or harmed by the infrastructure improvements, and that Renton's permit decision should be affirmed. iv. RSMPD §7.16.02(A) and 8 Petitioner's next claim is that Renton's permit decision violates RSMPD §7.17.02(A) and (B) and that section's limitations on stream alteration. RSMPD § 7.17.02, does not speak to stream alteration, but rather it details trail -related permitted uses. Petitioner apparently meant to refer to §7.16.03(A) and (B). Section 7.16.03 states that: A. Stream alteration is prohibited in unique and fragile areas, except if the stream alteration is part of a public flood hazard reduction/habitat enhancement project approved by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies. B. Stream alteration solely for the purpose of enlarging the developable portion of a parcel of land or increasing the economic potential of a parcel of land is prohibited. Renton City Attorney 100S2""St Po Box 626 ri.°tO(!onrof S�1r��mC.��r;�tc`crr:t �:: 917 + .ri ♦ Renton WA 980570626 Phone: (425) 430480 �N�+Q Fax: (425) 255-5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1s 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Renton agrees with Petitioner that stream alteration is prohibited in unique and fragile areas, with some exceptions, and that the alteration cannot be solely to increase the property's economic potential. However, Renton must disagree with Petitioner's argument because there is no stream alteration, the location is not unique and fragile and this project does not solely increase the property's economic potential. Renton is not altering or changing the stream. (See Declaration of Mr. Steve Lee, p. 6). The bio-swale will be approximately 40 feet from May Creek, and the only significant change to May Creek is that cleaner water will run from the bio-swale to the discharge pipe and from the discharge pipe into May Creek. (See Declaration of Mr. Steve Lee, p. 5-7, and Declaration of Ms. Suzanne Dale Estey, Exhibit 6, p. 20-21). Additionally, the bio-swale will release the cleaner water at the same or nearly the same volume as the water currently enters the creek. (See Declaration of Mr. Steve Lee, p. 7). May Creek, west of 1-405, near Lake Washington Boulevard, is neither unique nor fragile. The area under the RSMPD §5.04 is an Urban Environment, and it is zoned as a mixed-use commercial location. As evidenced by the old buildings at the Pan Abode/proposed Hawk's Landing Hotel site, Renton's project abuts a former industrial site. Additionally, the creation of a sidewalk, a bio-swale, and improved waterlines next to or under the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard is not going to negatively impact May Creek. Yet again, Petitioner is both misinformed and has failed to state a claim or demonstrate harm or prejudice as a result of the infrastructure improvement. V Renton City Attorney 1 DD S 2"d St Box 626 �enzl)n s rvrorinn for 5ummury 10/17 ~ ..0 Re t Renton, WA 98057-0626 Phone: (425) 430 -WO �� N Fax: (425) 255-5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 B 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 B. Renton's permit decision was consistent with RCW 90.58.020 of the Shorelines Management Act of 1971. Petitioner also claims that Renton's permit decision was inconsistent with RCW 90.55.020. As this Board knows, RCW 90.58 is the Shorelines Management Act of 1971. RCW 90.58.020 is entitled Legislative findings, State policy enunciated — Use preference. The sections of this statute cited by Petitioner are: There is, therefore, a clear and urgent demand for a planned, rational, and concerted effort, jointly performed by federal, state, and local governments, to prevent the inherent harm in an uncoordinated and piecemeal development of the state's shorelines. Permitted uses in the shorelines of the state shall be designed and conducted in a manner to minimize, insofar as practical, any resultant damage to the ecology and environment of the shoreline area and any interference with the public's use of the water. Renton completely subscribes to the policy and preferences noted by the state legislature in RCW 90.58.020. Addressing the first excerpt of RCW 90.58.020, there is nothing uncoordinated or piecemeal about the permit or the infrastructure improvement project near May Creek. In one effort, the infrastructure project will result in the installation of utilities, specifically a waterline, a bio-swale; and then a sidewalk_ The only remaining work could be the installation of the soft -surface trail near the creek, if Renton successfully acquires the private property abutting May Creek, and if the funds are available. (See Declaration of Ms. Suzanne Dale Estey, Exhibit A, p. 3-4, 6-7 and 9). Addressing the second excerpt of RCW 90.58.020, there is no damage to the ecology and environment of the shoreline area and there is no interference with the public's use of May Creek. Renton infrastructure improvements will improve the ecology Y Renton City Attorney 100 s 2rd 5t A + Po Box 626 r, fn'; IV ot1 -nor -Sunlmui .'.1,'rr::(r T":r 11/17 ♦ � Renton, WA 98057-0626 Phone: (425) 430-6480 �vTV0Y Fax: (426) 255.5474 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 and environment around and in May Creek by providing cleaner water. (See Declaration of Mr. Steve Lee, p. 5-7, and Declaration of Ms. Suzanne Dale Estey, Exhibit 8, p. 20-21). The truth is, in May Creek's current condition, west of 1-405, and east of Lake Washington Boulevard, there is little to no public use of May Creek at that location due to aggressive overgrowth of invasive vegetation. (See Declaration of Mr. Steve Lee, p. 1-2). When this project is completed, the public will have much greater access to enjoy May Creek west of 1-405 and east of Lake Washington Boulevard. (See Declaration of Ms. Suzanne Dole Estey, Exhibit A, p. 3-4, 6-7 and 9). Simply put, Renton is in complete compliance with the policy and preferences of RCW 90.58.020, and Petitioner has not demonstrated a genuine issue of factor any actual or specific damages or prejudice to himself. Asa result, Renton's decision should be affirmed. C. Petitioner may not argue any facts or findings related to the proposed Hawk's Landing hotel development project, when he failed to exhaust his LUPA remedies and when this SHB does not have jurisdiction over that permit. Petitioner's remaining contentions are improper under well-settled LUPA court decisions. Under Samuel's Furniture, Inc. v. The Department of Ecology, 147 Wn.2d 440; 54 P.3d 1194 (2002), the Washington State Supreme Court held that: Ecology must file a timely LUPA petition challenging a local government's decision to allow a development project after it has determined that the project at issue is not within the shoreline boundary. If Ecology fails to file a LUPA petition under such circumstances, it cannot collaterally challenge the local government's determination that the project is not within the shoreline jurisdiction by bringing independent enforcement actions against the property owner or developer. In this case, because Ecology failed to file a LUPA petition challenging any of the City's land use decisions relating to the Samuel's expansion project within 21 days, it can no longer challenge the City's determination that the project is not within the shoreline jurisdiction. Samuel's Furniture, n. 2d at 463-464. 'I' Q Renton City Attorney 100 5 2' St G + Renton, ox 626 �;envPtor� � �crran for SuntrnOrvJudi,�;.�t?- 12f17 ♦ ..e ntt on, WA 98057-0626 Phone: (425) 430-6480 � ria Fax: (425) 255-5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 s 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 In the instant matter, Petitioner, like the Department of Ecology in Samuel's Furniture, failed to appeal Renton's final decision -maker, the Renton City Council's decision on the proposed Hawk's Landing Hotel. (See Declaration of Vanessa Dolbee, Exhibit H, p. 1). And like the Department of Ecology in Samuel's Furniture, after failing to appeal that decision, Petitioner cannot collaterally challenge the determination that none of the proposed Hawk's Landing Hotel project is within the May Creek shoreline because none of the project would be within 200 feet from the ordinary high water mark of May Creek (See Declaration of Vanessa Dolbee, Exhibit G, p. 19); and that surface water drainage would not percolate and travel over Lake Washington Boulevard, to and through the Quendall Terminals to Lake Washington (See Declaration of Mr. Steve Lee, Exhibit B, p. 2). Those unchallenged findings stand as established facts before this Board. it is clear from the Washington State Supreme Court's decision and reasoning that no one, including the Department of Ecology or Petitioner, is exempt from LUPA requirements and timeframes. As a result, Petitioner's claims that are specific to the proposed Hawk's Landing Hotel and its possible construction are not before this Board. Even if this Board wanted to modify Renton's decision about that matter, the Board does not have jurisdiction because Petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. (See Declaration of Vanessa Dolbee, Exhibit E). D. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate standing to bring this petition. Petitioner does not have standing to appeal Renton's permit decision. First, he claims that he is a resident of the City of Renton and a member of SEGB who lives a short fi_ Renton Clty Attorney 100sest + ~ PO Box 626 s ,vlotion inr 5urnrl�CrV JLlUt7l71r �, - � 13/17 .s Renton, WA 98057-0525 Phone: (425) 430 -WO N � Fax: (425) 255-5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 distance from the infrastructure improvement site. (Petition for Review, p. 11. I. 24). Second, he claims that he uses the May Creek shoreline and Lake Washington, (Petition for Review, p. 111.24). Third, he claims that he "is negatively impacted by improper proceedings and lack of appropriate designs." (Petition for Review, p. 121. 3) His alleged damages are "increased damage to the shoreline quality' in the form of "lower water quality," a "loss of visual and recreational amenities," harm to wildlife, "an inability to comment on the full and completed review of a single true project application and the projects [sic] lack of attention to design criteria and shoreline management purposes," and because of a denial of the right to have the "community planned and development [sic] consistent with the" RSMPD. (Petition for Review, p. 12 L 5) In Cowiche Canyon Conservancy, 118 Wn-2d at 808, the Washington State Supreme Court reiterated that private persons who did not own the property adjacent to or even in the vicinity of protected body of water did not have standing to bring an action. In Cowiche Canyon Conservancy, the trial court found that plaintiffs did not have "any right, title or interest to the trestles, the property upon which they were situated, or any adjacent property." Ibid. Further, under both RCW 34.05.530, (the Administrative Procedure Act), and under RCW 36.70C.060, (the Land Use Petition Act), standing requires that a party show 1) that the action or decision "has, prejudiced or is likely to prejudice that person; 2) that the "person's asserted interests are among those that the agency [or local government] was required to consider, and 3) that a "judgment in favor of that person would substantially eliminate or redress the prejudice to that person caused by the" action or decision. LUPA adds a 4th re i ent that all administrative � 1Y O Renton City Attorney 100 S 2n° St �1 PQ Box 626 genron S fOotion torsulnrnclry 14/17 ♦ .L ♦ Renton. WA 98457-0626 Phone: (425) 430-0480 Fax: (425) 255-5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 remedies be exhausted. Petitioner's residency and proximity claims are insufficient to satisfy either act or the Cowiche Canyon Conservancy standard. First, being a Renton resident, and living more than 10 blocks away, or roughly more than a mile from the subject location, is insufficient. Like the plaintiffs in Cowiche Carryon Conservancy, Petitioner has no right, title or interest in the property or any adjacent property. Without that right, interest or property Petitioner has no standing. Second, his alleged use or enjoyment of the local shorelines is insufficient. Petitioner has failed to identify the frequency and/or the degree of his alleged loss. His petition states that he enjoys recreation "in Lake Washington and May Creek basin areas" "or desires to do so." The only shoreline that applies here is May Creek. This infrastructure improvement project is not within 200 feet of fake Washington, and Petitioner has not alleged anything to the contrary. As a result, this is really about May Creek. Petitioner knows that as May Creek currently exists near the project site, he cannot walk, "boat, fish, bicycle or swim with his family" in or along May Creek. Even if considering Lake Washington is appropriate for this analysis, using Petitioner's theory, every person that has ever been fishing, swimming or on a boat, or who has a view or has visited someone with a view, and every person who drives past the lake or who has ever been to a lakefront beach would have standing. When the RCW 34.05.530 and RCW 36.700.060 factors are considered, that does not appear to be the intent of the legislature. And reading Cowiche Canyon Conservancy, the courts have not interpreted the SMA differently. Y UPO :'rn U 5 n✓1Gtrnr, Io�5�1,nn,cir, 1uCc�n� r. 1517 ♦ Renton City Attorney 100 S 2nd St Box 526 Renton, WA 96057-0626 Phone: (425) 430480 �N � Fax: (425) 255-5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Third, Petitioner has not shown and cannot show that any proceedings were improper or that the designs are not appropriate. The fact that Petitioner wants to re- litigate the Hawk's Landing Hotel project after failing to appeal Renton's final decision, does not make that process or the one related to this infrastructure project improper. (See Declaration of Vanessa Dolbee, Exhibit E). As made clear in Samuel's Furniture, Petitioner cannot collaterally attack Renton's decision concerning a completely separate project after failing to exhaust his administrative remedies in that matter as required by RCW 36.70C.060(2)(d). As detailed above, every design is consistent with the RSMPD. Finally, Petitioner has not shown prejudice, likely prejudice, or "injury in fact" "To claim standing, a party must allege a justifiable controversy based on allegations of substantial, rather than speculative or abstract, personal harm. Biggers v. City of Bainbridge island, 124 Wn. App. 858, 863; 103 P.3d 244 (Div ll, 2004). Here, Petitioner claims damages in the form of "lower water quality" "loss of visual and recreational amenities;" harm to various wildlife; and "an inability to comment on a full and completed review of a single true project application." (Petition for Review, p. 12. 1.5); These allegations do not constitute actual, specific or substantial prejudice or "injury in fact." His petition is devoid of any basis to find standing. Petitioner's alleged prejudice is abstract, and claim of damage to water quality or wildlife is absolutely wrong. Unequivocally, the drainage water quality will be improved. (See Declaration of Mr. Steve Lee, p. 5-7, and Declaration of Ms. Suzanne Dale Estey, Exhibit B, p. 20-21). Even if he was correct, Petitioner, under Cowiche Canyon Conservancy, lacks of any right, title or Y O Renton City Attorney 100 S 2nd St � PO Box 626 £'ntU 7'S ri✓IctfC.n for$irrr?rr?ar.l,.r[.r;n r 1617 + ..4 } Renton, WA 98057-0626 Phone. (425) 430-0480 ��'NT� Fax: (425) 255-5474 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 f 21 22 23 24 25 interest in the property or adjacent property, and therefore, under Cowiche Canyon Conservancy, Petitioner's claims have failed to establish standing. 7. Conclusion. As a result, Petitioner has failed to raise a genuine issue as to a material fact, or any substantial damage or prejudice. Renton is complying with every requirement of RCW 90.58.020, and its own Shorelines regulations. Petitioner, under SamueFs Furniture cannot collaterally attack the LUPA determination about another project after failing to file a timely appeal under LUPA. He has no actual or substantial damages or prejudice because the infrastructure improvement improves water quality, and enhances safety and accessibility to May Creek. Finally, the infrastructure improvement preserves the natural character of the shoreline; results in a long-term over short-term benefit; protects the shoreline ecology; increases public access to publicly owned areas of the shorelines; and may increase recreational opportunities for the public in the shoreline, Therefore, Renton respectfully requests that the Board grant Renton's Motion for Summary Judgment and dismiss Petitioner's Petition for review in its entirety, and any further relief as the Board my deem just and equitable. DATED THIS 05 day of N%A1Op7IW , 2010. Garmon N som WSBA No. 31418 Renton Assi ity Attorney Q Renton City Attorney G 100 S 2n° St A + Po Box 626 `P;7ii71 1:'fotlot fOr5,�7I?fTl;If'� �UCri�Y7i.'+ " 17/17 + ..4 ♦ Renton, WA 98057-0626 Phone: (425) 430-6480 'NQ Fax: (425) 255-5474 REPORT OF GF,OTECHNICAL STUDY LAKE WASHINTON BOULEVARD City of STORM AND WATER IMPROVEMENTS RENTON, WASHINGTON srn S&EE JOB NO. 1002 MARCH 17, 2010 d;,J2, � RD 1002rpt S&EE S&EE SOIL. & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. 16625 Redmond V4'ay. Suite M 124, Redmond, Wasltington 98052425) 868-868 March 17, 20 € 0 Mr. Barry Baker, PE Gray & Osborne, Inc. 701 Dexter Ave. N., Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98109 Report Geotechnical Investigation Lake WA Blvd Storm and Water lmprovcntents Renton, WA Dear Barry: We are pleased to present herewith our Report of Geotechnical study for the referenced project. Our services were authorized by Gray and Osborne, Inc. and have been provided in accordance with our proposal dated December 7, 2009. We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services. Should you have any questions regarding the contents of this report or require additional informatien, please contact the undersigned. �j 28166 � 4 GREs: /,r 6 V - Z0 IQ3 Very truly yours, SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC, C. J. Shin, Ph.D., P.E. President -3- //?_ /o iao2rpt S&EF TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................. ..... i 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK.......................................................................................................................................I..... I 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS............................................................................................................................................ 2 3.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS.......... ............ — ... ...... --- ... .......... ................................................................. 2 3.2 GEOLOGY ....................................... 3.3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS........................................................................................................................ 3 3.4 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS .......... ........................................................................................................4 4.0 LABORATORY TESTING ..................................................................................................... 5 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................................. 5 5.1 STORM LINE CONSTRUCITON..................................................................................................................... 5 5.2 WATER LINE INSTALLATION.............. ................ .............. .................... ............... ................................... 7 5.3 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SLOPES.... ............................................... — ................ ............ ............. 7 5.4 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS AND HAZARDS............................................................................................ 8 5.5 CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING................................................................................................................. 8 5.6 ADDITIONAL SERVICES............................................................................................................................... 9 6.0 CLOSURE............................................................................................................................................................. 9 FIGURE 1: SITE LOCATION MAP FIGURE 2: SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN APPENDIX A: FIELD EXPLORATION AND LOGS OF BORINGS APPENDIX B: LABORATORY TEST RESULTS 1002rpr i S&EE REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL STUDY LAKE 'WASHINGTON BOCILEVARD STORM & WATER IPROVEMFNTS RENTON, WASHINGTON For GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the results of our geotechnical study for the proposed Lake Washington Boulevard Storm and Water Improvement project. A Site Location Map is shown in Figure l and a Site and Exploration Plan is shown in Figure 2, both are included at the end of this report. We understand that the project involves the installation of a storm water trunk line and a water line. The storm line will be about 900 feet in length and along the east side of the road. The majority of the line will be located in the existing drainage ditch which will be filled to the street level. As such, about 5 to 6 feet of maximum fill will be required. The new water line will be located in the road shoulder just to the west of the drainage ditch. Two thrust blocks will be required near the south end of the new water line where the line will turn west across the road. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of our study is to provide recommendations regarding the geotechnical component of the project. Specifically, our services included the followings: 1. Review of existing regional and local geologic information, reports, and studies relevant to the project design. 2. Performance of onsite subsurface investigations by the drilling of two soil test borings and two hand auger borings. 3. Performance of a laboratory testing program. 4. Performance of engineering analyses to evaluate the settlement potential of compressible subsoils, assessment of impacts and recommendations regarding mitigation. 1002rp► S&EE 6. Recommendations regarding types of suitable imported fill, fill placement techniques, and compaction criteria. 7. Recommendations regarding passive earth pressures and coefficient of friction for the thrust block design. 8. Consideration of seismic conditions and potential impacts. 9. Preparation of this written report documenting our findings and recommendations. 3.4 SITE CONDITIONS 3.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS For most of the project area, a storm water drainage ditch currently flanks the castside of' Lake Washington Boulevard. The bottom of the ditch was about 4 to 6 feet below the street level. The slopes at the west side of the ditch were covered with crushed rock and incline at about 1.511:1 V. Flatter side slopes, ranging from about 2H: IV in the southern portion to 51-1-1V in the northern portion are present along the east side of the ditch. At the time of our field exploration, the ditch bottom is covered with tal l grass and about 6 to 12 inches of water was present in the ditch. The ditch connects to a culvert near the south end of the project area. The ditch bottom is about 5 feet in width. except in the northern portion of the ditch where the east side slope has been flattened, the ditch bottom becomes over 15 feet in width. An existing, single -story, metal building is present along the east side of the ditch. The distance from the center of the drainage ditch to the building varies from about 10 to 25 feet at the south and north ends of the building, respectively. Underground utilities along the east side of the road include power and communication. Underground utilities along the west side of the road include water, gas and an 84 -inch diameter, pile -supported sanitary sewer pipe. The railroad (BNSF) embankment is present to the west of this pipe. J Oo2rpt 2 M EE 3.2 GEOLOGY (:ant,m l The project site lies in the middle portion of the Puget Lowland, an elongated topographic and structural depression tilled with a complex sequence of glacial and non -glacial sediments that overlie Tertiary bedrock. The soils deposited during and after the most recent glaciation dominate the surface and subsurface geologic conditions in the project area. These soils are highly interwoven by repeated sequences of deposition and mass wasting such as erosion and land -sliding. Published geologic information (Generalized Geologic Map of Northwestern King County, YYashingtan State Department of Natural Resources) indicates that the site area is underlain by undifferentiated sedimentary deposits (Qa). The materials include inter -fingered clay, silt, peat, sand and gravel. Previous field explorations in the project area indicate that the depth to bedrock is about 45 feet. (Seahawks Headquarters and Practice Facility, Renton, WA by Shannon & Wilson, Inc., November 14, 2006). Seattle Fault The Seattle Fault is a collective term for a series of four or more cast-west-trcnding, south -dipping fault strands underlying the Seattle area. The southernmost mapped strand of the Seattle Fault is the closest known fault to the site. This thrust fault zone is approximately 2 to 4 miles wide (north -south) and extends from the Kitsap Peninsula near Bremerton on the west to the Sammamish Plateau east of Lake Sammamish on the east. The four fault strands have been interpolated from over -water geophysical surveys (Johnson, et al.,, 1999) and, consequently, the exact locations on land have yet to be determined or verified. Recent geologic evidence suggests that movement on this fault zone occurred about 1,100 years ago, and the earthquake it produced was on the order of a magnitude 7.5. ).3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS We explored the subsurface soil conditions along the storm line alignment by the drilling of two soil test borings, B-1 and B-2, and two hand auger borings HA -1 and HA -2. Borings B-1 and B-2 was drilled outside and near the south and north ends of the drainage ditch, respectively. Borings HA -1 and HA -2 were drilled inside the ditch_ The locations of these borings are shown on Figure 2 which is included at the end of this report. Details of the field exploration and logs of borings are included in Appendix A. In general, our borings show relatively consistent conditions, and the soils encountered are similar to 1 oo2rpt 3 S&EE materials described in the published geologic map. From the top down, the subsurface conditions include the following strata: Borings B-1 and B-2 encountered about 4 to 6 feet of Fill; Boring HA -1 encountered about 4 feet of fill; and HA -2 did not encounter any fill. The fill consisted of silty sand with gravel, The soil is generally damp and loose. 11) Recent sedimentary deposits This layer is about 20 feet in thickness and consists of very loose to loose sand with lenses or layers of very soft silt. Trace of organics including decornposed wood was found in the deposits. ICI) Glacial soils This layer consists of medium dense to very dense sand with gravel. The top of this layer was found at about 30 and 28,5 feet below the ground surface at B-1 and B-2, respectively. 3.4 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS As previously mentioned, about 6 to 12 inches of water was present in the drainage ditch at the time of our field exploration on December 28, 2009. Barings B-1 and B-2 found groundwater at about the same depth during drilling. Based on a previous study "Groundwater Discipline., 1405iNE 44`'' Street Inlerseclion, Renton, WA by ,Shannon & Wilson ". The shallowest groundwater table in the project vicinity has an average depth of 15 feet below ground surface, We anticipate that the depth of this shallow groundwater will vary with season and precipitation. 1002rpt 4 S&EE 4.0 LABORATORY TESTING One undisturbed, Shelby -tube sample was retrieved from the compressible silt layer at HA -2. The sample was transported to our sub -contracted soil laboratory for a consolidation test. The test results are included in Appendix B. The test results show that the silt has a moderate compression index of 7 percent (a parameter measuring the compressibility); and a moderate coefficient of consolidation of 2 ft' /day (a parameter measuring the speed of consolidation). 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 STORM LINE CONSTRUCITON Settlement The subsurface soils at the existing drainage ditch have a moderate compressibility. Based on our evaluation, the new till to be placed in the existing ditch will incur about 2 to 3 inches of ground settlement near the center line of the ditch. The time to reach the consolidation maturity will be about one to two months. Due to the variation of subsoils, the ground settlement would not be uniform along the ditch line. We estimate that a differential settlement of one to 2 inches may occur for every 50 lineal feet of the storm line. A higher differential settlement, on the order of 2 to I inches may occur at the north and south ends of the ditch line where the depth of fill will transition abruptly from minimal to about 5 feet. The differential settlement may cause pipe joins to distress and thus should be considered in material selections. Mitigation to such potential problem may include the use of flexible pipes and joints. The overburden from the ditch fill will also cause slight settlement on both sides of the ditch. Our evaluations show that about 112 inches of ground settlement may occur along the road shoulder. We believe that there will be a slight chance of ground fissures or cracks in the shoulder; however the chance of pavement damage is remote. An existing metal building is present to the east of the ditch line_ To avoid adverse impacts by the new fill, we recommend that the edge/toe of the new fill be at least 10 feet from the building. If Fill has to be I 002rpt 5 S&EE placed closer than 10 feet, the support condition of the building foundation should be explored. The exploration may include potholing next to the building. An evaluation should also be performed to assess the settlement potential that may be induced by the new till and mitigation options. Conventional solution in such scenario typically involve under -pinning the building foundations with small diameter pipe piles (pin piles). Subgrade Preparation in Existing Ditch Very soft silt and loose sand are present at the bottom of the existing ditch. Prior to the placement of the pipe bedding material, the subgrade should be prepared and stabilized. We recommend that all vegetation in the fill area be removed, and the subgrade be over -excavated 12 inches. A non -woven geotextile having a minimum grab tensile strength of 200 pounds should be placed at the over -excavated subgrade. The over -excavation should then be backfilled with 2 -inch minus crushed rock. The rock should be placed in one lift and compacted by at least 3 passes of a mechanical compactor that weighs a minimum of 300 pounds. Pipe Bedding We recommend that the pipe be bedded with at least 4 inches bedding material that meets WSDOT aggregate specification 9-03.12(3). Ditch Fill Structural fill should be used and the materials should meet both the material and compaction requirements presented below. Material Requirements: Structural fill should be free of organic and frozen materials and can include silty sand, sand, mixture of sand and gravel (pitrun), gravel, or quarry -processed stone. Structural fill material should be approved by the project geotechnical enginecr prior to use. Placement and Compaction Requirements: Structural fill should be placed in loose horizontal lifts not exceeding a thickness of 6 to 12 inches, depending on the material type, compaction equipment, and number of passes made by the equipment. Each lift should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum dry density as determined using the ASTM D-1557 test procedures. 1 oo2rpt 6 S& EE Catch Basin Subgrade Wet and soft soils may be encountered at the subgrade. In this event, the subgrade should be stabilized to avoid excessive structure settlement. Subgrade stabilization can include over -excavation of 12 inches and backfill with compacted crushed rock Groundwater may be encountered, we anticipate that the seepage rate will be low and the water can be handled by pumping from sumps. 5.2 WATER LINE INSTALLATION Trench Excavation and Backfill The excavation for the water line should encounter silty sand with gravel. The trench wall should be stable without shoring if less than 3 feet in depth. We anticipate a stable trench subgrade. As such, pipe bedding material can be placed over Subgrade once the loose cuttings are removed. We anticipate that the excavated soil can be used for trench backfill. Please note that this soil is silty in nature and thus will be moisture sensitive. Imported structural fill should be used if moisture -conditioning of the onsite soil is not practical_ The criteria for the structural fill are stated above. Thrust Block Design Concrete thrust blocks can be designed with a passive soil resistance of 200 pounds per cubic feet, equivalent fluid density and a coefficient of friction 0,5 at the base. These values include a safety factor of 1.5. Soft silt may be present at the thrust block subgrade. This soil is susceptible to strength loss due to disturbance. If occurs, the subgrade should be stabilized to avoid excessive block settlement. Subgrade stabilization can include over -excavation of 12 inches and backfill with compacted crushed rock. 5.3 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SLOPES When temporary excavations are required during construction, the contractor should be responsible for the safety of their personnel and equipment. The followings cut angles are provided only as a general reference: I002rpt 7 S& E E For temporary excavations less than 3 feet in depth, the cut bank may be excavated vertically. For temporary excavations greater than 3 feet but less than 5 feet in depth, the cut should be sloped no steeper than 1 11:1 V from top to bottom. )latter slopes for all temporary cuts may be required if seepage occurs. All permanent slopes should be no steeper than 211:1 V_ Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any slope. Also, all permanent slopes should be seeded with the appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and maintain the slope stability. 5.4 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS AND HAZARDS The project site is situated within Seismic "Lone 3. We recommend that Site Class D as defined in the 2006 IBC be considered for any seismic design. Due to the presence of loose sandy subsoils and shallow groundwater table, the site is susceptible to liquefaction hazards, Liquefaction is a condition when vibration or shaking of the ground results in the excess pore pressures in saturated soils and subsequent toss of strength. Liquefaction can result in ground settlement or heaving. In general, soils which are susceptible to liquefaction include saturated, loose to medium dense sands. However, recent studies show that liquefaction can also occur in fine-grained (silty and clayey) soils during strong earthquakes_ (Bray, J.D., et. al. 2004). It is our opinion that the soft subsoils at the site have a moderate to high liquefaction potential. Therefore, moderate to severe distortion to the storm line may occur. It is our opinion that post -earthquake maintenance will be a reasonable mitigation option. 5.5 CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING Depending on the season of the proposed construction, the subgrade of the proposed storm line may be dry or 6 to 12 inches below the groundwater table. We envision that if the construction occurs in the winter months, the storm water that is currently running in the ditch should be collected at an upstream location and discharge at a downstream location using a temporary pipe line. A temporary concrete dam may be needed at the collection point. Assuming an over -excavation depth of 12 inches below the subgrade, our flow net analyses show that a groundwater inflow of about 0.2 to 0.5 gallons per hour per lineal foot of the ditch may occur. We believe that this groundwater flow can be handled by sump pumps spaced at 50 to 100 feet along the ditch, The discharged water from the sumps will be turbid and will required sediment control before discharge. 1002rpt 8 S&EE 5.6 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Additional services may be required during the design and construction of the project. We envision that the services may include the following: I- Review of design plans to confirm that our geotechnical recommendations are properly implemented in the design. 2. Attendance of design meetings and provision of design support. 3. Construction monitoring services. The tasks of our monitoring service will include the followings: 3.1 Review contractor's submittals. 3.2 Observe and approve structural fill material. 3.3 Monitor excavation and subgrade stabilization. 3.4 Monitoring of placement and compaction of structural fill. 4. Other geotechnical issues deemed necessary. 6.0 CLOSURE The recommendations presented in this report are provided for design purposes and are based on soil conditions disclosed by field observations and subsurface explorations. Subsurface information presented herein does not constitute a direct or implied warranty that the soil conditions between exploration locations can be directly interpolated or extrapolated or that subsurface conditions and soil variations different from those disclosed by the explorations will not be revealed. The recommendations outlined in this report are based on the assumption that the development plan is consistent with the description provided in this report. If the development plan is changed or subsurface conditions different from those disclosed by the exploration are observed during construction, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions, and if necessary, reconsider our design recommendations. I 002rrt 9 S&EE S&EE Figure 1 Site Location Map Newper7 Hazelwood ra m Coy Greek P rk, i �' 6F �asN �➢ : � � Newcastle� corr C4 E rg SITE s h. t F May ::reek A S&EE Figure 1 Site Location Map / y �.• os ' f JM�' r Y•; A 41, /' ! ! 7 (Not -To -Scale) r Al INTERSECTION, rr a _ 17 dam• ��• ;� SOUTH LINE SEC 29 ' W1TH WEST RfR LINE NORTHERN PACIFIC RR- RIGHT-OF-WAY13 MW I j !l I7 w,q i! ' � � !a "`"4 . � 'p�'� n' L w 58.x• * N I 1i -�. a �EXit _ ,r If ..r A . 2228.02" 1115.92' t !: T - 221.64' 1- 4 d� 1. :57.58' ! I R �.1 �I / i f�.. f. > �• r� 1 �Jf !... tri i/ / I, �i � �•` f w fill wd.+....� I •�! v l N 7231,706 E 03me ` /r�/ HA -2 f i r 1 Ij r�' �'/ I/If �p r ♦f �� ! fif �x 11��-.. Reference: Site plan provided by Gray & Osborne SEF 'l► B-1 Approximate Soil Test Boring Location Figure 2 Exploration Plan Job no. 1002 � Site And Ex HA -1 Approximate Hand Auger Boring Location P APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION AND LOGS OF BORINGS The soil strata at the project site were investigated by the drilling of two soil test borings, B-1 and B-2 and two hand auger borings, HA- l and HA -2 on December 28, 2009. The soil test borings were advanced by 3 -inch I.D. hollow stem auger using a track -mounted drill rig. A representative from S&EE was present throughout the drilling to observe the operations, log subsurface soil conditions, obtain soil samples, and to prepare descriptive geologic logs of the exploration. Soil samples were taken at 2.5- and 5 -foot interval in general accordance with ASTM D-1586, "Standard Method for Penetration Test and Split -Barrel Sampling of Soils". After the boring was terminated, the borehole was backfilled with bentonite chips. The hand auger borings were drilled with 3 -inch O -D. hand auger by a field representative from our office. The hand auger boreholes were backfill with onsite soil after the drilling was terminated. The boring logs arc included in this appendix. A chart showing the Unified Soil Classification System is included at the end of this appendix. 1002rpt S& EE b W N a BORING B-1 Cn Q. N U •U (p f/J Q m 'S� c Sofl Description -0 0 16 �, � s �' sM Brown and dark brown silty fine sand with some crushed rock (damp)(very loose)(fill) i 2s / 2 y ML Dark gray silt with fine sand lenses, some organics {wood debris}(damp)(very soft) —5 SZ a is o is o 11! 6 Mil sP Gray fine sand with silt lenses (wet){loose} 10 a a 4 i i I i i i - 15 1 18 3 is 4 'r - decomposed wood at 19.5 feet -20 (Boring log continued on Figure 1b) Client: Gray & Osborne Drilling Method: 3"-I0 HSA advanced by track -mount Diedrich D-50 Drill Rig Sampling Method: SFT sampler driven by 140 -Ib auto hammer Drilling Date: December 28, 2009 Drilling Contractor: Holocene Drilling Figure 1 a SUE Job No. E Lake Wa Blvd. Storm & Water Improvement BORING B-1 (Continued) U j Soil DescripSon SP I Gray fine sand with silt lenses (wet)(loose) - 10 intoes silt Layer with trace fine gravel at 24 feet sP I Gray fine to medium sand (wet)(medium dense) Boring terminated at a depth of 31.5 feet on December 28, 2009 Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 5 feet during drilling. Client: Gray & Osborne Drilling Method: Y -ID HSA advanced by track -mount Diedrich D-50 Drill Rig Sampling Method: SPT sampler driven by 140 -Ib auto hammer Drilling Date: December 28, 2009 Drilling Contractor: Holocene Drilling Figure 1 b S&EE Job No 1002 Lake Wa Blvd. Storm & Water Improvement i 3 18 7 3 a m 5 4 3 i U U —0 6 2 i 3 18 7 3 5 4 3 i 4 6 2 3 4 i 4 15 � P1 10 1 ,a 2 18 4 15 s 18 2 k 20 --- i - SM BORING B-2 Soil Descnption Brown silty fine sand with fine to medium gravel, layers of brown fine to medium sand with fine to medium gravel (pitrun) (damp)(medium dense to loose)(fill) say Inter -bedded layers of gray fine sand and silt with occasional organics ML (damp)(looselsoft) (Boring log continued on Figure 2b) Client- Gray & Osborne Drilling Method: 3" -ID HSA advanced by track -mount Diedrich D-50 Drill Rig Sampling Method: SPT sampler driven by 140 -Ib auto hammer Drilling Date: December 28, 2009 Drilling Contractor: Holocene Drilling Figure 2a $�Sc EE Lake Wa Blvd. Storm & Water Improvement qty n� O U U Gj BORING B-2 (Continued) Soil Descrrptrorr -20 o 18 `, sP� inter -bedded layers of gray fine sand and silt with occasional organics Drilling Contractor: 4 ML (damp)(looselsoft) I '5 I I -26 I 1 18 2 18 t 1 , I __5 I -driller report easy puching tube until 28.5 feet I I _J I I sP Gray fine to coarse sand with file to medium gravel (wet)(dense to very dense) I - 30 I I 17 18 34 12 � 35 Boring terminated at a depth of 31.5 feet on December 28, 2009. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 7.5 feet during driliing. - 35 I I I 1 I I I I I i I I I I , I I I I I I I -40 I I - - --- --- I Client: Gray & Osborne Drilling Method: T -ID HSA advanced by track -mount Diedrich D-50 Drill Rig Sampling Method: SPT sampler driven by 140 -Ib auto hammer Drilling Date: December 28, 2009 Drilling Contractor: Holocene Drilling Figure 2t7 SUE Lake Wa Blvd. Storm & Water Im rovement Job Na 1(102 p G7 Q ~�° c c r� j BORING HA -1 Soil Descrippon sM Dark brown silty sand with grass roots (topsoil) i ML Gray silt with some organics (wood debris)(very soft) sP Brown fine to coarse sand with some fine gravel, trace silt (loose)(fill) ML, Gray silt with some organics (wood debris)(very soft) Boring terminated at a depth of 5 feet on December 28, 2009. 1 I I I i Subgrade under 6 inches of water - 10 I i I , 1 I _gal '---I Client: Gray & Osborne Drilling Method: 3" diameter hand auger Drilling Date: December 28, 2009 Figure 3 S�Sc EE Lake Wa Blvd. Storm & Water Improvement a w as q � mm Q m o U U l�h O co co —0 4 I I I � I I I I I � , I I I I I , I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I , —10 ; 3 I I I I I 1 I I I I I i I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I —15 i 1J I I I 1 � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I i 3 I 1 i I i I 1 i � I I 1 I I � I I -20 BORING HA -2 U j Soil Description MLI Gray and brown silt with some organics (wood debrfs)(very soft) sP' Brown fine to coarse sand with some fine gravel, trace silt (loose)(fill) Boring terminated at a depth of 7.5 feet on December 28, 2009. Subgrade under 12 inches of water. Client: Gray & Osborne Drilling Method: 3" diameter hand auger Drilling Date: December 28, 2009 Figure 4 S&EE Improvement Lake Wa Blvd. Storm & Water Im Job No laoz p UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM h L DEPTH OF STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DEPTH OF UNDISTURBED (SHELBY TUBE) SAMPLE SL DEPTH OF GROUNDWATER DURING DRILLING S&EE SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART AND KEY TO EXPLORATION LOG �- DESCRIPTION - MAJOR DIVISIONS -- - } w GW WELL -GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL -SAND MIXTURES, CLEAN LITTLE OR NO FINES GRAVELS LL L ' w ♦ POORLY -GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL -SAND MIXTURES, (LITTLE OR j 07 W m GP L}TTLE OR NO FINES NO FINES} _ w GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND -SILT GRAVELS _ Q `x w�� w m N : E {! MIXTURES WITH FINES ly w, w � C7 a s a Q r O L a u / f;A GC CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND -CLAY (APPRECIABLE a � = Z p �{ MIXTURES AMOUNT OF FI NES) SW _ WELL -GRADED SAND OR GRAVELLY SANDS, CLEAN p o x ¢ LITTLE OR NO FINES SANDS o z a J W = = _ } SP POORLY -GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS, (LITTLE OR � O o > W Q w LITTLE OR NO FINES NO FINES)rj ¢ 0 ¢ a Uw o I o SM SILTY SANDS, SAND -SILT MIXTURES SANDS Q<F w Q �wWu �a Q ga U ma a Z nx ' WITH FINES `h o4 c� p x >o SC CLAYEY SANDS, SAND -CLAY MIXTURES (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) o o w ML INORGANIC SILTS, VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR I z> CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY SILTS & CLAYS p < 4 CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYSLfoul} a nlr LEss THAN so U7 Lu S a _= =`- OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILT -CLAYS OF LOW o d J PLASTICITY Z oo =< ' MH INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DfATOMACEQUS FINE SANDY OR SILTY SOILS, ELASTIC SILTS Q _ q T CH INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, gar SILTS &CLAYS �' z" CLAYS 'w• a ---- LIQUID UWT GREATER THAN VJ U LL OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, - ORGANIC SILTS PT PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS j h L DEPTH OF STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DEPTH OF UNDISTURBED (SHELBY TUBE) SAMPLE SL DEPTH OF GROUNDWATER DURING DRILLING S&EE SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART AND KEY TO EXPLORATION LOG APPENDIX B LABORATORY (CONSOLIDATION) TEST RESULTS One dimensional consolidation test was performed on a Shelby -tube sample retrieved at a depth of one to three feet at HA -2 location. The soil sample was transported to our sub -contracted soil laboratory, Kleinfelder in Redmond, WA. The test results are included in this appendix. 1002rpt S& EE 10 0.00 r 2.00 4.00 0 c 6.00 N 8.00 10.00 12.00 Vertical Strain versus Stress Vertical Stress - psf 100 1000 10000 100000 S&EE Figure B-1 S no. 1002 Stress -Strain Curve for Consolidation Test Neyht lYp.t`Xeyni i0'utmrtx PROJECT: LOCATION: MATERIAL TYPE; SAMPLE SOURCE: SAMPLE TYPE.: SAMPLE PREP.; REVISED (WN)7 S.E.E. Unknown. Client submitted. Shelby Tube HA -3 Native Yes N JOB NO: 94046 LAB NO: 9309 DATE SAMPLED: 12/29/2009 PREFORMED BY: B.Kochanski REVIEWED BY: J.Mason One -Dimensional Consolidation Using Incremintal Loading (ASTM D 2435-04) TEST SPECIMEN DATA LIQUID LIMIT: N/A PLASICITY INDEX: NIA BEFORE TEST Wet w+t (g) = 200.66 Dry w+t (g) = 171.56 Tare Wt (g) = 50.45 Height (in) = 1.00 Diameter (in) = 2.50 Moisture = 24.03% Wet Den. (pcf) = 116.57 Dry Den. (pcf) = 93.99 Void Ratio = 0.793 Spec. gray.' = 2.60 Saturation = 81.8% 'Specific gravity assurned Shearing device used: Created by ICON 3.1 .3; Copyright 2004, GEOTAC Vertical ress (psf) GV (U/day) 500 0.696299 2000 1.416883 4000 11.370169 A Height (in) 8000 0.983066 16000 0.472006 AFTER TEST Wet w+t (g) = 200.66 Dry w+t (g) = 171.56 Tare Wt (g) = 50.45 A Height (in) = 0.13 Height (in) = 0.87 Moisture = 24.03% Wet Den. (pcf) = 134.51 Void Ratio 0.55 Saturation = 117.1 s$I[3NAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS HAWK'S LANDING RENTON, WASHINGTON May 2009 Prepared for. Hawk's Landing, LLC GERALYN REINART, P,E. 159 DENNY WAY, #I I 1 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98109 (206) 285-9035 City Of Renton P+allriingl Division TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM May N, , 2009 TO: Dan Mitzel Hawk's Landing, LLC FROM: Geralyn Reinort, P.E. SUBJECT: Hawk's Landing - Traffic Impact Analysis Introduction/Executive Summary The purpose of this analysis was to summarize the traffic -related impacts associated with the construction of a hotel at the Hawk's Landing development in the City of Renton. The proposed Hawk's Landing development is located in the southwest quadrant of the 1-405/NE 441h Street interchange in the City of Renton. NE 44th Street/Lake Washington Boulevard border the north and westerly side of the project site and the 1-405 southbound on-ramp borders its easterly side. The proposed hotel would have 173 rooms and include typical support services provided by full service hotels including a lounge, restaurant, spa, banquet facilities, and conference space. Tb#. ass.umed buildrOut/cornplefion year. for the, hotel is=2Ql.3-� ACcess'to fhe site would be -provided from Lake- Washington BoO16vardcit iwa locations: The first is from r the..exis.ting Pan Abode-access:at the northerly -property line, with, themain agcess,located. approximately midpoint along the siie's'westerly•property Iine. -Based.on future volume. ,forecasts, o o -lane cre ss-secti6 `would' accommodate the future traffic using h: main_access. ­Left:4urn sforage ori Lake Washington Boulevard is recommended at the main -access in order to provide safe -egress. The existing pan` Abode driveway across from Seahawks Way'is" recommended to operate as a right-in/right-out access due to its close locati`on`-to the°1-405 Southbound Ramps. Bvald out,of the hafel could:.potentialiy.genefate`ijust over;]400`daily ;trips, 97 AM°pealehour:trips ,.and 12:PMpeak;trips. The critical movements at the adjacent Lake Washington Boulevard /Sea hawks Way intersection are currently operating at level of service "D" or better during the peak hours, but the southbound movement could drop to level of service "E" during the AM peak hour over the next few years, with or without the hotel. Other critical intersection operations include the 1-405 ramps at NE 441h Street, where some movements are currently operating at level of service "F" during the AM peak hour, and the delay on these movements will increase over the next couple of years, with or without the hotel project. Specific details on the hotel project and fhe analysis of its impacts can be found in the subsequent sections. In general, the project will have a limited impact on the transportation system. Tt'te_:prciposdtrc�risp©nation:. i-hprbvdmlei Its will`mitigat6 hot Only,ihe<project.'s�impacts-on the, transportation sy..stem, but existing,cleficiencies. Referenced herein are prior analyses completed in the area including the "Port Quendail Access Options" technical memorandum, the Barbee Mill traffic impact analysis, and the Seahawks Headquarters traffic impact analysis. BackgroundlProject Description The proposed Hawk's Landing development is located in the southwest quadrant of the 1-405/NE 44th Street interchange in the City of Renton. NE 44th Street/Lake Washington Boulevard border the north and westerly side of the project site and the 1-405 southbound on-ramp borders its easterly side. The proposed action evaluated in the analysis is for a 173 -room hotel that would include typical support services provided by full service hotels including a lounge, restaurant, spa, banquet facilities and conference space. The parcel upon which the project is located is the existing 7.8 -acre Pan Abode site. Adcess to the site would be provided from Lake Washington Boulevard at Avo locations. The first of these accesses is from the existing Pan Abode 'access at the northerly property line with the main access located dpproximafely midpoint along the site's westerly property line. A build- ouf/completion year of 2011 is assumed for the hotel. Currently, Pan Abode occupies the site with multiple buildings, and storage and parking facilities. Immediately to the south is a wooded undeveloped site, with new residential construction on-going at the former Barbie Mill site 2 to the southwest. The new Seahawks training facility is located to the northwest along Seahawks Way (formerly Ripley Lane) and 1-405 is located immediately to the east, with miscellaneous commercial development immediately east of the freeway. Further south, residential development borders Lake Washington Boulevard. The parcel is currently zoned "COR" (Commercial/Office/Residential) which allows a mix of uses such as retail, office, or commercial space. A vicinity map of the area is shown on Figure 1 and a preliminary site plan for the project has been attached. Existing Conditions The subsequent sections describe the existing conditions in the project vicinity. 1. Streets The following describe the streets near the site that will be the most critically impacted by the project: Lake Washington Boulevard is a collector arterial that extends southerly from the NE 44th Street/1-405 Southbound Ramps to N. Park Drive. The street is striped for two lanes in each direction and includes left -turn storage at select intersections. The street is relatively flat with some horizontal curvature and includes a shared bike lane/walkway on the west side of the street. The adjacent land use is primarily single family residential south of the project site and the posted speed is 25 mph. Lake Washington Boulevard transitions into NE 44th Street at the 1-405 interchange and then continues northerly on the east side of the freeway interchange. NE 44th Street is a collector arterial that provides access to 1-405 and connects Lake Washington Boulevard on the west side of the freeway to Lincoln Avenue and Lake Washington Boulevard on the east side of the freeway. The street consists of one lane in each direction plus left -turn storage at the ramp intersections. The southbound ramp is controlled by a stop sign in the southbound direction, whereas the northbound ramp intersection is controlled by an all -way stop. The posted speed is 25 -mph. Seahawks Way (formerly Ripley Lanel is a two-lane local access street extending north from Lake Washington Boulevard just southwest of the 1-405 interchange and dead -ends several hundred feet north thereof. The street consists of two lanes with some gravel shoulder installed along the Seahawks facility frontage and is relatively flat and straight with a horizontal curve present on the approach to Lake Washington Boulevard. The posted speed is 25 -mph, 1-445 is a north -south freeway facility bordering the east side of the project site. 1-405 provides access to Bellevue and Kirkland to the north, eventually connecting with I-5 in Lynnwood and to Tukwila to the south where it also connects to 1-5. The freeway consists of two lanes in each direction plus high -occupancy lanes. 2. Transit/Non-Motorized Facilities M .frc 'Tr r sit`�s resp ©risible forprovidEng bus-,servlcer.in Reriton'. -Currently,,no routes,are`provided adjacent.to-the-°project>site Non -motorized facilities are limited in the area. As noted in the previous section, a shared walkway/bike lane is present on the west side of Lake Washington Boulevard, south of the project site. Otherwise, sidewalk is not present along Seahawks Way or Lake Washington Boulevard/NE 44th Street west of the freeway. Urban improvements have been installed along the east side of the freeway and include sidewalk. 3. Traffic Volumes Weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic counts were conducted at three locations for this analysis. Counts at these locations were updated from those conducted by the City of Renton in 2008 in order to capture traffic associated with the SFC (Sounders FC) headquarters that are located in the Seahawks training facility, along with full operation of the Seahawks facility. Furthermore, the Cify of Renton provided average weekday volumes for streets adjacent to the project site. The average weekday volumes and intersection count locations are summarized on Figure 2 and include the following: 1. 1-405 Northbound Ramps/N. 44th Street 1 1-405 Southbound Ramps/N.441h Street 3. Seahawks Way/Lake Washington Boulevard A summary of the AM and RM peak hour volumes for these intersections is shown on Figure 2A. 4 A comparison of the counts completed for this analysis with those completed in prior years, shows a decrease in the commuter volumes (i.e., eastbound in the AM peak and westbound in the PM peak), likely the result of the decreasing employment levels that are currently occurring. 4. Level of Service Capacity analyses for the peak hours were conducted at the intersections noted in the previous section in order to determine the current level of service/operating conditions. All of the intersections are stop sign controlled. More specifically, the 1-405 Northbound Ramp is stop sign controlled in all directions, whereas the 1-405 Southbound ramps and the Seahawks Way/Lake Washington Boulevard intersection operate with side street stop control in the north -south directions. "Level of service" (LOS} is a common term used in the Traffic Engineering profession that is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and its perception by motorists and/or passengers. These conditions are usually described in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. Six levels of service are designated, ranging from "A" to "F", with level of service "A" representing the best operating conditions and level of service "F" the worst. Calculations for the level of service analysis were conducted using the McTrans Highway Capacity Software version 4.1 d/e based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. The following table shows the current levels of service for these intersections using the traffic volumes shown on Figure 2A. Calculations for the level of service analyses have been attached. TABLE 1 EXISTING PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE A AM PEAK HOUR NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- D > 25 & < 35 seconds E BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND OVERALL 1-405 Northbound LOS C LOS F LOS F LOS C LOS F Ram /NE 44th Street 19.9 sec. 53.6 sec. 86.4 sec. 20.0 sec. 58.0 sec. 1-405 Southbound LOS F LOS 8 Ram /NE 441h Street N.A. >99.9 sec. N.A. 14.9 sec. N.A. Seahawks Way/Lake LOS B LOS D LOS A LOS A Washin ton Blvd. 13.7 sec. 29.9 sec. 8.0 sec. 9.2 sec. N.A. PM PEAK HOUR NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND OVERALL 1-405 Northbound LOS E LOS D LOS C LOS C LOS D Ram /NE 441h Street 44.6 sec. 28.4 sec. 17.4 sec. 15.2 sec. 29.4 sec. 1-405 Southbound LOS C LOS A Ram INE 44th Street N.A. 19.8 sec_ N.A. 81 sec. N.A. Seahawks Way/Lake LOS A LOS C LOS A LOS A Washington Blvd. 9.5 sec. 16.8 sec. 8.6 sec. 7.5 sec. N. N.A. - not applicable (i.e., calculation not provided for specific analysis, such as at stop - controlled intersections, not a critical movement, or no volume an subject movement) Whet-, LOS I Dela A < 10 seconds B > TO & < 15 seconds C > 15 & < 25 seconds D > 25 & < 35 seconds E > 35 & < 50 seconds F > 50 seconds {tor unsignalized intersections) Table 1 shows the level of service results for the peak hours, indicating that during the AM peak hour, two of the intersections have movements operating level of service "F", i.e., the southbound movement at the 1-405 southbound ramp and the southbound and eastbound movements at the 1-405 northbound ramps. During the PM peak hour, all movements are operating at level of service "E" of better. 5. Traffic Accidents Traffic accident data for the Lake Washington Boulevard/NE 44th Street corridor between Burnett Avenue/N. 36th Street and the 1-405 Northbound Ramps were provided by the City of Renton. The City accident data are from January 2006 through December of 2008. The following table 7.1 summarizes the accident frequency and severity along the corridor for this period. TABLE 2 ACCIDENT HISTORY LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD/NE 44M STREET CORRIDOR LocatEon/Date Accident Type Property Damage Injury Fatal[ Total Af Burnett Avenue 2006 0 0 0 0 2007 0 0 0 0 2008 2 0 0 2 At N. 361h Street 2006 Q 0 0 0 2007 a 0 0 0 2008 3 0 0 1 Between N. doh Street and Ripley Lane 2006 0 0 0 0 2007 0 a 0 0 2008 0 1 0 1 At Ripley Lane 5eahawks Way) 2006 0 0 0 0 2007 0 0 0 0 2008 0 1 0 1 At 1-405 Southbound Rams , " 2006 0 0 0 0 2007 1 0 0 1 2008 0 1 0 1 At 1-445 Northbound Ramps 2006 5 j.... 0 h 2007 3 3 0 4 2008 i 1 0 2 The;acclder'fifiistory:shows-a-limited raurnber ref accidents,,4orthe'most- part; along the corridor. The,exception:. is.at.,the.1 405 Northbound Ramps where on:average of four collisions per yearoccurred° (a total of 12 collisions over the three-year period). The majority of these twelve collisions consisted of right angle accidents (six of the 12 accidents). The remaining accidents included left -turn (two of the 12 accidents), sideswipe (two of the 12 accidents), rear -end (one of the 12 accidents), and fixed object (one of the 12 accidents). Two accidents were reported at the Southbound Ramps - the first of these was a left -turn collision, and the second was a right angle collision. The remaining five accidents along Lake Washington Boulevard included two rear -end collisions of Burnett Avenue, a rear end collision at N. 361h Street, a fixed object collision north of N. 40th Street, and a right angle collision at Ripley Lane (Seahawks Way). Injuries were reported in eight of the nineteen collisions, no fatalities were reported. 7 6. Roadway mprovement Projects Limited street improvement projects are listed in the City's Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The City of Renton has no street improvement projects listed in its most recent TIP. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) proposes to widen 1-405 between NE 44th Street and 112th Avenue SE. This project would construct two northbound and southbound general purpose lanes thereby increasing capacity by 100%. The environmental assessment for this project has been completed and construction funding is listed for 2015. Future Conditions Without Project The streets adjacent to the project site were the subject of a recent analysis completed by HDR Engineering/CH2M Hill with respect to redevelopment of the Port Quendali site. The Port Quendall analysis evaluated both a pre - 2015 (near-term condition) and a 2015 ("maximum capacity with improvements") condition. The pre -2015 near-term development condition analyzed a total of 1600+ new AM peak hour trips and 2300+ new PM peak hour trips, and the 2015 condition analyzed a total of 2000+ new AM peak hour trips and 3000+ new PM peak hour trips. The Port Quendall analysis also included an assumption that the Pan Abode property would generate 10% of the total trips. As noted earlier, the hotel at Hawk's Landing would be completed prior to 2015, which coincides with the near-term Port Quendall analysis. Consistent with recent traffic impact analyses completed in the area, the evaluation completed herein assumed a 2% yearly growth rate in existing traffic volumes. Also included in the background traffic volume projections is the completion of the housing development on the Barbee Mill property, which is currently under construction. Given the current downturn in economic conditions and the resulting decrease in traffic volumes that has been noted, this increase is likely to result in an over-estimate of actual conditions, thus representing a conservative analysis. Other incidental development may occur over the next few years; however, specific projects in the vicinity would be subject to further analysis to identify their impacts. The following describes the future base conditions for the horizon year (2011). 1. Traffic Volumes As noted above, 2011 is the designated horizon year for the build -out of the hotel. The 2% annual growth was applied to the volumes shown on Figure 2A with the Barbee Mill trips further added into the volumes. Trip assignment data for the Barbee Mill project was available from the TIA submitted, and modified to reflect the use of the access from Lake Washington Boulevard south of Seahawks Way. originally, trips from Barbee Mill would have been routed further north and then used Seahawks Way; however, this is no longer the case. This change results in less traffic using Seahawks Way, and more through traffic on Lake Washington Boulevard past the Seahawks Way intersection. Figure 3 shows the projected AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes for the year 2011 for the base conditions. A summary of the pipeline trips and intersection volumes are shown in Appendix A-] . 2, Level of Service Level of service calculations were conducted again for the intersections previously reviewed. It was assumed, for purposes of analysis, that no changes in the geometric conditions or traffic control at the intersections would occur in order to provide a comparison to current conditions. (Note: the proposed near-term improvements noted in the Port Quendall analysis will be referenced in subsequent analyses as part of the project impact mitigation measures.) The results of the future base conditions are shown in Table 3. 0 TABLE 3 2011 PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE BASE CONDITIONS < 10 seconds AM PEAK HOUR NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- I > 25 & < 35 seconds E > 35 & < 50 seconds BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND OVERALL 1-405 Northbound LOS C LOS F LOS F LOS C LOS F Rare /NE 441h Street 21.6 sec. 68.9 sec. >99.9 sec. 21.6 sec. 81.5 sec. 1-405 Southbound LOS F LOS C Ram /NE 44th Street N -A. >99.9 sec_ N.A. 17.3 sec. N.A. Seahawks Way/Lake LOS B LOS E LOS A LOS A Washington Blvd. 14.6 sec. 36.6 sec, 1 8.0 sec. 9.5 sec. N.A. PM PEAK HOUR NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND OVERALL 1-405 Northbound LOS F LOS E LOS C LOS C LOS E Ram /NE 44th Street 70.8 sec. 42.7 sec. 21.0 sec. 17.1 sec. 43.1 sec. 1-405 Southbound LOS C LOS A Ram /NE 44th Street N.A. 23.3 sec. N.A. 8.2 sec, N.A. Seahawks Way/Lake LOS A LOS C LOS A LOS A Washington Blvd. 9.8 sec. 18.7 sec. 8.8 sec_ 7.5 sec. N -A. N.A_ — nor appncat le (i.e., calculation not provided for specific analysis, such as at stop - controlled intersections, not a critical movement, or no volume on subject movement) &TIiT:7i�71 LOS Dela A < 10 seconds B > 10 & < 15 seconds C > 15 & < 25 seconds D I > 25 & < 35 seconds E > 35 & < 50 seconds F > 50 seconds Ifor unsignalized intersections) Table 3 shows the 20fiTid.VV6Pof servjce-results:;far the peclk cur base;,, cesradlt� tl .t l ![aating:;th.eltcwo of the three �fJhe,interseetions would have. m y.em6htss6p+erdting level.:of service „F' °:during the.AM peak hour,. i.e., the south baund`movemeritat the 1-405°southbound ramp, ^ , cl :the. southbound, and eastbound movements: at<1-405 northb.oun.d-romps. (This is the same as the existing conditions.).. D.yring the .PM peak,,hou.r, the - no und;-movement at the 1-405 northbound ramp would drop to level of``` ervf e -'-`F". 3he'southbound movement at the Seahawks Way/Lake Wcxshln'gtori='5oulevard intersecti©n would drop to "E" during the AM peak hd&frc5mAts�'current level of service "D" condition, 10 Future Conditions With Project The subsequent sections describe the likely potential impacts that will occur with the hotel development. The proposed hotel would construct 173 rooms plus support facilities. The following information summarizes the impacts associated with its construction. 1. TripGeneration The development of the hotel will generate new traffic onto the adjacent street system. The trip generation for the hotel has been estimated using the most recent values in the ITE Trip Generation (81h Edition, 2008). Five different lodging facility options are listed in the Trip Generation manual (i.e., hotel, all suite hotel, business hotel, motel, and resort hotel). Based on discussions with the project applicant, ITE Land Use 310 - Hotel, best represents the proposed facility. The ITE description of Land Use 310 - Hotel is as follows: Hotel: "Hotels are places of lodging that provide sleeping accommodations and supporting facilities such as restaurants; cocktail lounges, meeting and banquet rooms or convention facilities, limited recreational facilities (pool, fitness room); and/or other retail and service shops. Some of the sites included in this land use category are actually large motels providing the hotel facilities noted above." The following table summarizes the estimated trip generation associated with the hotel using number of rooms as the independent variable. TABLE 4 CCU" ATM Wrcrn Av Tere r--CMCD wrrnAi - 1/J rooms Trip Rate Peak Hour Trips AM PM Daily/AM Peak/ In/Out In/Out !TE Land Use PM Peak Daily Trips Total Total 0 - Hotel* L 8.17/0.56/0.59 59/38 54 /488 ___per room 1413 97 102 - 1/J rooms 2. Trip Distribution Assi nment The trip disfribution/assignment for the hotel has been shown on Figure 4. The trip assignment shown on Figure 4 for the hotel is based on the trip generation patterns used for the Port Quendall analysis, which used the distribution assumed in the 1-4051N1= 44th Street Interchange Project Access Point Decision Report. One modification was made to the noted distribution, i.e., an assignment of traffic to and from the Seahawks facility, since the proposed hotel is intended to serve visitors associated with the facility. Otherwise, the trip distribution was the same and included the following: • 48% of the trips using 1-405 to/from the south. • 30% of the trips using 1-405 to/from the north. • 70% of the trips to/from the south of the project site along Lake Washington Boulevard.* • 5% of the trips to/from the Seahawks facility via Seahawks Way • 4% of the trips to/from the southeast via NE 441h Street and Lincoln Avenue • 3% of the trips tolfrom the northeast via NE 44th Street/Lake Washington Boulevard. * - !Vote: a percentage of the trips to/from the south on Lake Washington Boulevard were re- assigned to Seahawks Way. The above described distribution is primarily oriented to and from 1-405 since the majority of both employees and visitors would likely be using the regional transportation system. Figure 4A shows the AM and PM peak hour trip assignment through the three intersections (1-405 Northbound Ramps/ NE 44th Street, 1-405 Southbound Ramps/NE 44th Street, and Seahawks Way/Lake Washington Boulevard) that are included in this analysis. 3. Traffic Volumes Figure 5 shows the projected AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes for the year 2011, with the hotel trips. The project trips were added into the 2011 "base volumes" shown on Figure 3 to produce the volumes shown on Figure 5. These volumes are also summarized in Appendix A-1 . 4. level of Service Level of service calculations were conducted again for the intersections previously reviewed. Again, no changes in the geometric conditions or traffic control at the intersections were assumed for purposes of 12 i s comparison to the existing and 2011 base conditions. The results of file future conditions with the hotel project trips are shown in Table 5. TABLE 5 2011 PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE (WITH HOTEL k7. < 10 seconds AM PEAK HOUR > 10 & < 15 seconds C NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- > 35 & < 50 seconds F BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND OVERALL I-405 Northbound L05 D LOS F LOS F LOS C LOS F Ram /NE 4411, Street 25.2 sec. 79.4 sec. >99.9 sec_ 22.4 sec. 92.3 sec. 1-405 Southbound LOS F LOS C Ram /NE 441h Street N.A. >99.9 sec. I N.A. 1 18.5 sec. N.A. Seahawks Way/Lake LOS C LOS E LOS A LOS A Washington Blvd_ 15.2 sec. 43.0 sec. 8.2! 9.5 sec. N.A. PM PEAK HOUR NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND OVERALL 1-405 Northbound LOS F LOS E LOS C LOS C LOS F Ram /NE 44th Street 96.2 sec. 46.0 sec. 22.8 sec. 17.5 sec. 53.3 sec. 1-405 Southbound LOS D LOS A Ram /NE 441h Street N.A_ 26.9 sec. N.A. 8.4 sec. N.A. Seahawks Way/Lake LOS A LOS C LOS A LOS A Washington Blvd. 9.3 sec.20.7 sec. 9.0 sec. 7.6 sec. N.A. - ncir appijcooie [I.e., calculation not provided for specific analysis, such as at stop - controlled intersections, not a critical movement, or no volume on subject movement) WherF LOS Dela A < 10 seconds B > 10 & < 15 seconds C > 15 & < 25 seconds D > 25-& 5 35 seconds E > 35 & < 50 seconds F > 50 seconds (Tor unsignalized intersections) The.,addition`dl k 'ffic cissociated=with-deveiopment at,the hotel,results in further,increases-rsn,defayt frot�6,�fhre`bctse:: cbnditions: As-with,the 201,1:base eondltlor3s, ofi the,three ii.ers�tlons,would-:havey movements;. 0p&dtii7g fe el of service "P. during;.the-AM-peak hour,- i.e.; the southbound movement at the <1-40&southbound ramp�and'-the southbound and eastbound: movements at.1-405 ,northbound ramps. During the PM peak hour, the northbound movement at the 1-405 northbound ramp would operate at level of service 7" and the overall level of service would 13 f drop to "F". The southbound movement at the Seahawks Way/Lake Washington Boulevard intersection would remain at level of service "E" during the AM peak hour, as noted for the base conditions. i 3. Parking Parking for the hotel will be provided on-site, in the hotel garage and in surface stalls located on the easterly side of the building. The parking garage would include 107 stalls and 124 surface stalls would be constructed including five NEV (neighborhood electrical vehicles) with plug-in facilities for charging. Information from both the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation (3rd edition - 2004) and the Urban Land Institute (ULI) Shared Parking guidelines (second edition - 2005) has been reviewed to determine if the proposed supply will meet peak demand. Both publications provide peak parking demand for hotels. ITE provides parking demand data based on number of rooms for both average peak demand and the 85th percentile demand. ULI parking demand is based on number of rooms and lounge and conference room areas. The following weekday parking ratios were noted: ITE parking demand per room • Average peak: 0.91 spaces per room = 157 stalls • 85th percentile peak: 1.l 4 spaces per room = 197 stalls ULI parking demand • Peak demand: 1.15 spaces per room + 10 spaces per thousand square feet of lounge + 30 spaces per thousand square feet of conference room = 331 stalls* *1(1.15 X 173) + (10 X 4) + (30 X 3.07)] = 331 The proposed number of surface and garage stalls is less than the ULI .__ recommended value, but adequate per the ITE values. Since the ITE values dre met, it is likely that the proposed parking is adequate to meet peak demand. Furthermore, in the event that demand exceeds supply, hotel management could implement valet parking which would increase supply. 14 6. Site Access/Design As noted earlier, access to the site would be provided from Lake Washington Boulevard of two locations. The first is from the existing Pan Abode access at the northerly property line, with the main access located approximately midpoint along the westerly property line. These two accesses would be connected internally through the surface parking area located on the easterly side of the hotel. An estimate of potential volumes at the main access for the AM and PM peak hours is shown on Figure 6. (Figure 5 shows the estimated volumes for the northerly access across from Seahawks Way.) Full access was assumed at the main access with the existing Pan Abode access limited to right -turns in and out due to its closeness to the 1-405 Southbound Ramps. Located between these two accesses is the northerly access to Lake Washington Boulevard for the Barbee Mill development. The need for lett-turn storage for the main access (southwest -bound) on Lake Washington Boulevard was reviewed using Figure 910-12a from the WSQ0TDesign Manual (figure has been attached). Based on the anticipated volume of left -turns from Lake Washington Boulevard, 100 -feet of tun;sQrde rs'eeotmerialed' (Note: Storage lengths based on an unsignalized intersection condition as noted on Figure 910-13a.) A level of service analysis at the Lake Washington Boulevard main access was conducted to determine the expected operating conditions upon completion of the hotel. A single through lane in each direction plus a separate southwest -bound left -turn lane on Lake Washington Boulevard, and separate northwest -bound lett- and right -turn lanes on the main access were assumed, along with stop sign traffic control of the exiting movements from the hotel. The results of the analyses are shown in Table 6. TABLE 6 2011 LEVELS OF SERVICE LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD/MAIN SITE ACCESS NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND OVERALL AM peak hour LOS C LOS A 16.2 sec. N.A. N.A. 9.8 sec. N.A. PM peak hour LOS B LOS A lo.osec. N.A. not applicable (i.e., calculation not provided for specific analysis, such as at stop - controlled intersections, not a critical movement, or no volume on subject movement) 15 Note: Lake Washington Boulevard considered the east/west street and the hotel access the northbound movement in the above table. i The capacity analyses indicate that the new access should operate at good levels of service with level of service "C" or better present during the peak hours. 7. I'ro'ect Impacts/Mitigation Y::cl IGI L.1iC:.'��SlJ.1>:LIY'<"+! :1..`?.V4-L,.i.UA[,�i, Alva<peak hour taps;peak Drips,:, The critical movements at the adjacent Lake Washington Boulevard/Seahawks Way intersection are currently operating at level of service "D" or better during the peak hours, but the southbound movement could drop to level of service "E" during the AM peak hour over the next few years, with or without the hotel. Other critical intersection operations include the 1-445 ramps at NE 441h Street, where some movements are currently operating at level of service "F" during the AM peak hour; the delay on these movements will increase over the next couple of years, with or without the hotel project. Lake Washington Boulevard, adjacent to the site, is striped for one lane in each direction and includes left -turn storage at select intersections. The street has not been upgraded to urban standards, i.e., curb, gutter and sidewalk have not been constructed. Three arterial intersections were reviewed in this assessment, all of which are currently controlled by stop signs. The capacity analyses for the existing levels of service indicate that during the AM peak hour, two of the intersections have movements operating level of service "F". The increase in traffic volumes over the next couple of years would further increase delay at the intersections, with or without the hotel. Both near-term and long-term roadway/intersection improvements for the NE 441h Street corridor/interchange were identified in the Port Quendall analysis. lhterinn measures to mitigate the impacts associated with the hotel were reviewed to decrease the intersection delay until further corridor improvements can be funded and constructed. The following summarizes fi e.se measures. 1-405 Northbound Ramp/NE 44th Street - the level of service analyses indicate an overall level of service (LOS) "FI condition during the AM peak hour with or without the hotel and an LOS "F" condition 16 1 j during the PM peak hour with the hotel. Additional lanes on the west, north and south legs of the intersection were reviewed to determine the improvement in operating conditions. These improvements would include construction of a third lane on the west leg such that a separate lane would serve the left, through and right -turn movements and the addition of an exclusive left -turn lane on both the north and south legs of the intersection. An all - way stop would still control the intersection. The overall level of service during both the AM and PM peak hours could be improved to LOS "D", although some individual lanes or movements could continue to operate of LOS "E" or "F". The installation of a traffic signal to control the intersection would further decrease the overall delay and improve all legs of the intersection to LOS "D" or better. (Note: both the lane and traffic signal installations were noted in the Port Quendall near-term improvements.) • 1-405 Southbound Ramp/NE 441h Street - the southbound left -tum from the ramp is currently operating at LOS "F" during the AM peak hour due to insufficient gaps in traffic, The only reasonable means of correcting this deficiency is the installation of a traffic signal in order to create artificial gaps in traffic. This installation would result in LOS "D" or better during the peak hours. (Note: the traffic signal installation was noted in the Port Quendall near-term improvements_) r Seahawks Way/Lake Washington Boulevard - the southbound movement at this intersection would drop to LOS "E" by 2011 during the AM peak hour without the hotel, with increasing delay to this movement upon completion of the hotel. This condition is the result of increased through volumes on Lake Washington Boulevard and a decrease in gaps in traffic. As noted in prior studies in the area, the close location of this intersection to the 1-405 southbound ramps allows for limited improvements. The installation of a short center merge/acceleration [ane on Lake Washington Boulevard between the intersection and the 1-405 southbound ramps to mitigate the LOS "E" condition was reviewed. The results of the analysis indicate that the southbound left -turn movement could operate at LOS "C" with this installation. The final critical issue is the operation of the site accesses. A southwest - bound left -turn lane on Lake Washington Boulevard at the main access should be constructed in order to serve traffic from the north that would be 17 -U § entering the site. The main hotel access would include a center landscaped island and a separate lane for left- and right -turning vehicles exiting the site. As noted earlier, the northerly access (the existing Pan Abode access) is recommended tooperate as a ri ht-in/ri ht -out access due to its close spacing to the 1-405 southbound ramps. The main access is S 'x, expected to operate acceptably upon completion of the hotel :Although ✓ tl aa'ces:tiwilt bloca:ted 1prfy ctQsQ,tQthe°rrcrtheily acess,servin the Barbee Mill development,:.confllcts:betwee the leff-turns entering the :two opposing sites arevexpected:to tie minimal:due tQJhe low;volume of<leffY turns projecfed at the, Barbee Mill site and minimal queue -lengths at the hotel; entrance:. The above measures-mitigate.nof only impact§ asscicI fed with the hotel, bu# also ire -existing conditions. Conclusions/Recommendations The development of the hotel at Hawk's Landing would generate additional traffic onto the existing transportation system, Both near-term and long-term roadway/ intersection improvements for the NE 44th Street corridor/interchange were identified in the Port Quendall analysis. Interim ` y -0 measures to mitigate the impacts associated with the hotel to decrease the intersection delay until further corridor improvements can be funded ✓'-�` and constructed were discussed in the prior section. The following improvements/actions are recommended for consideration by Staff for the project: °,.'Participation in the construction of additional lanes at the NE 441h Street/1-405 Northbound Ramps. • Installation of 100 -foot soufhbound left -turn storage lane (or two- way left -turn lane) on Lake Washington Boulevard at the main hotel access, ,y. Construction of a center merge/refuge lane on Lake Washington Boulevard between Seahawks Way and the southbound ramps. Shared cost of the traffic signal installation at the NE 441h Street/1-405 Southbound Ramp. .` Construction of frontage improvements along Lake Washington 4 Boulevard Z € t ., SII';1! r. },• ¢f :r" ! 18 Y E • Payment of the City's traffic mitigation fee, credit for the existing Pan Abode trips should be allowed as well as any costs associated with the above mitigation measures. Besides the"above- mitigation considerations, the Applicant has met with r:presentatives of Metro Transit to ensure that the future site configuration i designed to accommodate bus turnaround through the project site for future transit -service. No other mitigation measures are recommended for consideration at the present time. 19 ATTACHMENTS 20 Appendix APPENDIX A-1 SUMMARY OF PEAL{ HOUR VOLUMES AT CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS AAA Peak Hour Volumes 1. 1-405 N8 Rarnns INF ddlh SfrPa# 2. 1-405 SR Ramnc INF Adth VraaAi EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W82 NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Existing volumes 281 148 351 164 165 140 10 94 91 29 27 344 With 2% annual _growth 292 112 365 171 172 146 10 98 95 30 28 358 Pipeline trips: Barbee Milt 2W3192 43 - - - - _ - _ _ 2011 volumes w/out ro'ect 313 42 1 1 - 4 146 10 98 95 34 28 361 Project tri s 1 27 - - 50 - 28 - - - - 2 2011 volumes with ro ect 315 734 6 446 142 146 38 98 95 30 28 363 2. 1-405 SR Ramnc INF Adth VraaAi 3. 3eohawks WfIV11_rika Wrfch!nnfrnn Ae%odnu.- ,4 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL N6T NBR SBL SBT SBR Existing volumes - 665 5 390 —Z-6--138 133 - 0 - - 54 1 117 With 2% annual - 692 5 4 200 - - - - 56 1 122 growth - 43 - - 8 _ - - _ _ _ Pipeline trips: - 42 1 1 - 4 - - _ - - - 4 Barbee Mill 2 27 - - 50 - - - 5 _ _ 3 2011 volumes - 734 6 446 142 - - - - 56 1 126 w/out r0'ect Project tri s - 14 i 8 _ 32 - - - - _ 18 2011voiumes with - 748 24 406 174 - - - 56 1 144 ro'ect 3. 3eohawks WfIV11_rika Wrfch!nnfrnn Ae%odnu.- ,4 cvia�u 11ip u.s-,ognrnenr rnrougn intersection to reflect current access layout ** - total includes deleted Pan Abode trips EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR .-Existing volumes 15 636 3 4 192 64 0 0 2 32 1 3 With 2% annual growth T 6 662 3 4 200 67 0 0 2 33 1 3 Pipeline trips: Barbee Mill* - 43 - - 8 _ - - _ _ _ 2011 volumes w/out pr2ject 16 705 3 4 208 67 0 0 2 33 1 3 Project tris 2 27 - - 50 - - - 5 _ _ 3 2011 volumes with ra'ect 18 732 0** 0** 258 67 0 0 5** 33 0** 6 cvia�u 11ip u.s-,ognrnenr rnrougn intersection to reflect current access layout ** - total includes deleted Pan Abode trips PM Peak Hour Volumes 1. 1-405 HS Ramps/NE 407 Street 2. 1-40S SR Ramns /NF doth Vram ESL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL N8T NBR SBL SBT SBR -Existing volumes 67 144 67 76 138 83 10 259 167 54 22 287 With 2% annual growth 70 150 70 79 144 86 10 280 174 56 23 299 Pipeline trips: Barbee Mill 3 10 3 - 6 - 1 - - - - 9 2011 volumes w/out project 73 160 73 79 150 86 11 280 174 56 23 308 Project trips 1 2 15- - 2 - 26 - - - - 2 2011 volumes with o' rec# 74 152 88 79 152 86 37 28Q 174 56 23 310 2. 1-40S SR Ramns /NF doth Vram 3. Seahawks Wav/Lake Werchinafnn Rnitlovnrr! EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NST NBR SK SBT 56R -Existing volumes - 145 24 211 287 - - 0 - 128 3 256 With 2% annual growth - 151 25 220 299 - - - - 133 3 266 Pipeline trips: Barbee Mill - 16 2 - 16 - - - - - - 22 2011volurnes w/autro'ect - 167 27 220 315 - - - - 133 3 288 Project trips - 18 23 - 30 - - - - - - 16 201 ivoiumes with [_project - ' 185 50 220 345 - - - - 133 3 304 3. Seahawks Wav/Lake Werchinafnn Rnitlovnrr! - -fvj,)uu mp us,,jgnrnenr rnrougn inrersectlon to reflect current access layout - total includes deleted Pan Abode trip EBL EBT EBR W8L WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR S8L SBT SBR Existing volumes 4 125 0 3 519 39 1 0 6 31 0 4 With 2% annual rowth 4 130 0 3 540 41 1 b 6 32 0 4 Pipeline trips: Barbee Mill* - 18 - - 38 _ - - - _ - - 2011 volumes w/out project 4 148 1-0-3 578 41 1 0 6 32 0 4 Pr ject trips 2 36 - - 46 - - - 5 - 3 2011 volumes with ra'ect 6 184 0 0** 624 41 0* 0 5** 32 0 7 - -fvj,)uu mp us,,jgnrnenr rnrougn inrersectlon to reflect current access layout - total includes deleted Pan Abode trip Site Plan figures VIW)7H M, - i SE 76th St. �y N-T.S. Jj8763] � 3 / 2 f N" Q�fh st / 760 4478 / 4 Project site — — --- /- 'i / 6499 Qi - 12987 Q C 6 U / N. 40th St. / I J ! / N. 36th St. I I CD 1 � C a o m � m :c - Peak hour count locations (see Figure 2A for vc Pumes) Ql x XXXX 2008 City of Renton Average Weekday Traffic -� [XXXX] - 2005 City of Renton Average Weekday Traffic 1-405 EXISTING AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES & PEAK HOUR COUNT LOCATIONS GeralynRelnart,P.E - FIGURE 2 159 penny Way, #111 Hawk's Landing - Hotel Page Seattle, WA. 98109 Renton. WA. F-2 #1 Lake Washington Blvd./ Seahawk's Way 64 36 32 7 260 3 ' 4 15 U 2 1'.."636 r 654 Y- 0 2 3 #1 Lake Washington Blvd.1 Seahawk's Way 39 35 X31 �`.._�561 4 0 4 p J6 125 -• 1291' 7 ;D AM Peak Hour 2 1 NE 44th St.11-405 SB Ramp 172 z 117 -y 54 f 1 133-4.--, 523 1- 670 --,-665 i 390 5 PM Peak Hour 2 ! NE 44th St./i-405 SB Ramp 387 A_ 256 3 287 --.r 498 r 169 --x145 211 24 #3 NE 44h St./1-405 NB Ramp 400 t 344 --JI.- -.- 29 144 r 27 281 165 4 740 - a 108 94 164 t A 351 1 195 #3 NE 44h SUI -405 NB Ramp 36{3 287 - .-' I ` 54 $3 r 22 67 13a-- =--297 278 ---144 1 .t 269 76 A 67 10--- 167 446 EXISTING AM & PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES E , FIGURE 2A �..,.� . I Lake Washington BJvd.1 Seshawk's Way 67 37 3 /3 279 3 208 4 705 t", 724 a 2 Lake Washington Blvd./ 7Se a hawk's w k's Wa y 41 622 30 32 7( 578 4 6 148 152 0 7 AM Peak Hour 2) NE 44th St.11-405 SE Ramp 1 X8}3 126 56 142 548 740 --734 Y 406 PM Peak Hour 2) NE 44M St -11-405 SB Ramp 424 268 -- 133 315 536 194 —167 220 27 NE 44h St,11-405 NB Ramp 419 :361 30 146 28 313 173 490 A ell --1-117 171 98 381 1 C) 95 41, 203 NE 44h St -A-405 NB Ramp 387 308 56 86 23 73 316 ti 306 160 79 280 73 11 -- -v-174 1 465 2011 ESTIMATED AM & PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES BASE CONDITIONS Zeinart, P.E. , W-, ft, , , FIGURE 3 1-405 ESTIMATED TRIP DISTRIBUTIONIASSIGNMENT eirart, P.E. FIGURE 4 30 424 %[9 } i /3% l ) Ort II/(y I 42 I (2) SE 76th St. / z \N�aamsr. ( 70 (3 3 I T_ (2) t Project site ----- I - } 4% 6 ` 57 r` f`y0% [2) L: i l` ]% - 142 `'I e I (4) f N 40th St. 1678 42 1 N- 36th St. I � � ? a' Y E �1 a 00 fi xx% - percent distribution xxx - daily trips Y (xx) -AM peak hourtrips cr3 -.I [xx] - PM peak hour trips 1-405 ESTIMATED TRIP DISTRIBUTIONIASSIGNMENT eirart, P.E. FIGURE 4 KT.S. #1 Lake Washington Blvd.! Seahawk's Way 1` 50- 3 2 5 n 27 i (i D Lake Washington Blvd./ Seahawk's Way -.f 46 f 1 y 3 2 h 36 k5 AM Peak Hour NE 441h $t./1-405 SS Ramp I f 32 „--x 18 PM Peak Hour NE 441h St.11-405 SB Ramp 16 !I! -- v 30-7, 23 NE 44h St.11-405 NS Ramp 2 r i 1 2 71 28 S 1 Yt3 j NE 44h StJI-405 NB Ramp 2 -r A I i =� 2 4 15 26 _ ESTIMATED TRIP ASSIGNMENT AT INTERSECTIONS n Rei I— 4f E . FIGURE 4A �� MT.& #1 Lake Washington BIvd.1 Seahawk's Way 67 39 33 4 _� 325 V 258 Y ' 0 19 4: 732 Ot:_ i, 5 750 s=, 0 #F17Lakehington Blvd./ s Way41 2665 irf 624 r 7� � �0 D 6 D 5 184 ' 190 f D D f� 5 AM Peak Hour J NE 44th StA-405 SB Ramp 201 d. 144 S6 1 174 75"0 580 772 406 L 24 PM Peak Hour NE 44th SIA -405 SB Ramp 440 304 rt�i �' +- 133 It 3 345 --- - 565 r' 235 -"---185 220 V 50 iA3 NE 44h St.11-405 NB Ramp 421 363 -.-% 30 146 r 26 ' 314 175 492 825--119 171 9a I 95 231 #3 NE 44h St./1-405 NB Ramp 389 310 56 I 86 t 1 23 74 1524 317 324 r;— 162 Y 260 79 88y 37 �-� 11-174 491 2011 ESTIMATED AM & PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES na", RE IWav *111 FIGURE 5 3 -------- _.__See "Figure 5" for intersection volumes. Mote/ i aye ' a� v j AM peak hour PM peak hour 251 604 208 555 53 49 . 29 38 688 144 i 694 - — 4 s y 2011 ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES AT SITE ACCESSES Geralyn Reinarl, P.E. VC 159 Denny Way, #111 FIGURE FHawk's Landing - Hotel Page Seattle, 1!/A. �J8109 Renton. WA. F-6 Turn Lane Storage Requirements Intersections At Grade KEY: Below curve, storage not needed for capacity. Above curve, further analysis �l recommended. r, r' Ezti 4fl cnP�` ILI 50 mPh 60 mph 25 20 15 10 5 a :715 % Total DHV Turning Left (single turning movement) Notes: 01 QHV is total volume from both directions. [2] Speeds are posted speeds. 1000 S; 900 800 fl 0 700 600 61011" 400 300 0 Left -Turn Storage Guidelines: Two -Lane, Uinsignalized Figure 910-12a Chapter 970 Page 910-26 Design &Manua! M 22-07.02 Novernber 2007 Level of Service Calculations .. 1 " u> -F uvuaa vi ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS I Information Site Information Analyst r Agency/Co- Date nG /Co_Date Performed 2/26/2009 Analysis Time Period -AMpeak Intersection Nt R� lEnsdlction Ci nalvsis Year ex rage i or 44th Street/) -405 N1 7ps of Renton/WSDOT ProjectlQHawks'Land)n _ East/ West Street: NE 44th Street North/South Street: 1-405 NB Ram 1LWB glume Adjustments and Site Characteristics roach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R olume 281 108 351 164 165 0 °XoThrus Left Lane 50 50 roach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume 10 94 91 29 27 344 %Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration L TR L T LTR LTR P H F 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.94 0.86 Flow Rate 326 533 190 191 206 463 % Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 10 2 No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 Geometry Group 5 5 2 2 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Head ay Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left -Turns 1.0 0.0 1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Prop. Right -Turns 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.9 crop. Heavy Vehicle ,LT-adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 iRT-adj -0.7 -0. % -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 iHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 iadj, computed 8.84 8.84 8.84 8.84 8.84 8.84 )e arture Head and Service Time id, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 c, initial 0.29 0.47 0.17 0.17 0.18 0,41 rd, final value 8.84 8.848.84 8.84 8.84 8.84 :, final value 0.80 1 1.15 0.49 0.47 0.50 0.94 /love -up time, m 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0 )ervice Time 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 ;apacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 �i�a•/ii'•�Tlnn„mar,4�0%'](1.,.,.10/'1(lC,.+c;.,...,lAa�:___�_._4_.:.r,.,...ini�nn_�..---'m_..-.. ..-,.nnrr .. ,1, �., .,.. r, VV ".Y IJLUIJ viiuui ingc . iii z, HCS2000TM Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights R2 served Version 4.1d f;ip•//(`•�Tlnr,�man+c�/7(ln+ 04')()Q 4 -F;-\ A rl..:.:�+r.+ Capacity 407 533 375 397 401 492 Delay 38.78 115.58 20.93 19.15 19.94 53.56 LOS E F C C C F Approach: Delay 86.43 20.04 19.94 53.56 LOS F C C F 10tersection Delay 58.03 Intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights R2 served Version 4.1d f;ip•//(`•�Tlnr,�man+c�/7(ln+ 04')()Q 4 -F;-\ A rl..:.:�+r.+ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst gr Agency/Co. Date Performed 2/26/2009 [Analysis Time Period ami eak -1 mject Description Hawks' Landing EastMiest Street: NE 44th Street ntersection Orientation: East-West Jehicle Volumes and Adjustments ttaior Street T Fnsthmind rclgu 1 Vl G Intersection NE 44th Street/! -405 SB Rames Jurisdiction City of Renton/WSD O T nalysis Year jexistin2. 6 L T Orth/South Street, 1-405 SB R, tudv Period (hrs): 0.25 Mhr cfhni Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 665 5 390 133 0 Peak -hour factor, T Upstream Signal 0 PHF 1.00 0.82 0.82 0.88 0.88 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate Southbound Movement vehlh) 0 810 6 443 151 0 Proportion of heavy L T R L T vehicles, P HV 0 -- -- 4 -- -- 11vmUldf! tvpe { IInrihririari i AT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R glume (veh/h) 0 0 0 54 1 117 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 0 0 66 1 144 Proportion of heavy chicles, PHV 0 0 0 3 3 3 Percent grade (%} 0 2 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 D 1 1 1 Configuration I LT I I R 71�P'II�'l1 f(1!'111?I PTI�C VI /1 I�y�/, al �%14�P1YYi1hn1 A fl__,'r+, t ­%T K!']AAn 1 YY V- TY LL.Y "4V.P \+V11 L1 V1 rdoe G Ul L Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT R Volume, v (vph) 443 1 67 144 Capacity, cm (vph) 803 36 893 v/c ratio 0.55 1.86 0.16 Queue length (95%) 3.43 7.31 0.57 Control Delay s/veh) 14.9 647.0 9.8 LOS 8 F A Approach delay slveh 212.1 ,Approach LOS -- -_ F HCS2000 ` "' Copyright C 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d fila•/1('•�F>nnitrrc>ntco/ 7flon 14/7l1Cat�;,, �l A 4 '—_+...,+--NT --- Ia/`)()Q s,;� 1 f �•.�1.n sr� + rincr �nnn x -v- V uI "L4r w.11lAu vx TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information nal st gr Agency/Co. Date Performed 3/2/2009 Analysis Time Period am peak A a6c 1 V1L Intersection Seahawks Wa 1LWB Jurisdiction City of Renton Analysis Year existin EastANest Street: Lake Wash. Blvd/NE 44th North/South Street: Seahawks Way Intersection Orientation: East-West~ Project Description Hawks' Landin 0 1 0 Confi uration L TR LTR EastANest Street: Lake Wash. Blvd/NE 44th North/South Street: Seahawks Way Intersection Orientation: East-West~ — fStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Northbound Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Movement 7 8 9 Major Street Eastbound 12 L Westbound R Movement 1 2 3 0 4 5 6 1 L T R 0.50 L T R Volume (vehfh) 15 636 3 4 4 192 64 Peak -hour factor, PHI" 0.86 0,86 0.86 11 0.76 0.76 0.76 Hourly Flow Rate (vehfh) 17 739 3 5 252 84 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 1 -- -- RT Channelized? 1 -- -- Median type Lanes Undivided 0 0 1 RT Channelized? Configuration 0 LTR 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Confi uration L TR LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 2 32 1 3 Peak -hour factor, PHI- 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.69 0,69 0.69 Hourly Flow Rate {vehfh} 0 0 4 46 1 4 Proportion of heavy ehicles, PHv 0 0 0 11 11 11 Percent grade (%) 2 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Keproach EB WB Northbound Southbound 4;io•1/f�•1Tlnn„rr,a+tnU/7{1 aU/10Qm+:.....,1A 7 Ig1�nnn I VYV— YY O.Y . tut VU1i L.LU1 r-LLtYrr 4 UL Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR LTR LTR Volume, v vph) 17 5 4 51 Capacity, cm (vph) 1229 870 420 195 !c ratio 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.26 Queue length 95% Q.04 0.02 0.03 1.01 Control Delay s/veh ) 8.0 9.2 13.7 29.9 LOS A A B D Approach delay (s/veh) 13.7 29.9 L22TPC LOS -- -- B D HC32000T M Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d f1P�11('•1T1....,,.,-,o.,t�.oi�n,,.,,aoi�nc�„r+;..n..� n,t�.:..:.,+,...+..��r,,,,.,10%'7I1G�„a+;..,.-..1T,..-...,.V,.7S.n(l.f +...n �r�i�nnn ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information NE 44th Street! -405 NB Intersection Ram s Analyst r enc ICo. urisdiction City of Ran tonlWSD0T Date Performed 2/26/2009 nal sis Year existing Analysis Time Period PM peak North/South Street: I-405 NB Ramp/LIMB fila•//(''•S71nri�manted/7(lanrl�/'}nQat+;,-.nnl r1 .1,-.,;+,;,,f...,t..�1T.,...,10%'}I1G'�+,:...tr1Ta.,.�.1..'ll�l1'�7 , �»cr�nnn r ,u ��k I rrdVVKZti Larram East/West Street: NE 44th Street North/South Street: I-405 NB Ramp/LIMB Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics roach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume 67 144 67 76 138 0 °/oThrus Left Lane 50 50 Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume 10 269 167 54 22 287 %Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration L TR L T L TR L TR P H F 0.93 0.93 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.88 Flow Rate 72 226 84 153 483 412 % Heavy Vehicles 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 Geometry Group 5 5 2 2 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left -Turns 1.0 0.0 1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Prop, Right -Turns 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.8 Prop. Heavy Vehicle hLT-adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6--1 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 8.81 8.81 8.81 8.81 8.89 8.81 ©earture Head ay and Service Time hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 initial 0.06 0.20 0.07 0.14 0.43 0.37 hd, final value 8.81 5.81 8.81 8.81 8.81 8.81 finai value 0.18 0.51 0.21 0.36 0.90 0.77 Move -up time, m 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0 Service Time 6.5 5.8 6.5 5.8 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 fila•//(''•S71nri�manted/7(lanrl�/'}nQat+;,-.nnl r1 .1,-.,;+,;,,f...,t..�1T.,...,10%'}I1G'�+,:...tr1Ta.,.�.1..'ll�l1'�7 , �»cr�nnn TT uy U1v1l VV11LL V1 rage z of ,_/ HCS2000""1 Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. td F:In•Ilf •IFL:.,,,.,�,�..�„0/'1 (1., ., .TO/'l f1 C'�,. u:.., .�„5 A a�:__-`---`---1T_....in�nnc7_}-.r--..-_�m_.__._�..�r_nn-r �-�fnrin nnn Capacity 322 417 334 390 527 516 Delay 13-38 18,70 14.08 15.87 44.55 28.37 LOS 8 C B C E D Approach: Delay 17.42 15.24 44.55 28.37 LOS C C E D Intersection Delay 29.38 intersection LOS D HCS2000""1 Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. td F:In•Ilf •IFL:.,,,.,�,�..�„0/'1 (1., ., .TO/'l f1 C'�,. u:.., .�„5 A a�:__-`---`---1T_....in�nnc7_}-.r--..-_�m_.__._�..�r_nn-r �-�fnrin nnn TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information cyluo. Performed Isis Time Period I agc 1 01 G Intersection NE 44th Street%1-405 S8 Ramps Jurisdiction City Of RenfoniWSD O T nal sis Year 12xisfing L T f roject Description Hawks' Landin astANest Street: NE 44th Street North/South Street: 1-405 SB Ramps tersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments M a i o r Street F:i0hrm inri ►n► }L, .. Movement 1 2 3 4 5. 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 145 24 211 287 0 Peak -hour factor, R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 128 PHF 1.00 0.84 0.84 0.96 0.96 1.00 Hourly Flaw Rate 0, 97 Hourly Flow Rate 0 veh/h 0 0 131 (veh/h) 0 172 28 219 298 0 Proportion of heavy 0 Percent grade (°/a) 0 2 Flared approach N vehicles, PHS 0-- N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 1 0 IYIGVlQI I L G 1 lYlCI /Ide Ii RT Channelized? n 4Jllllf Y/lA4lJ n Lanes F 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 128 3 256 Peak -hour factor, 1.00 PHF 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0, 97 Hourly Flow Rate 0 veh/h 0 0 131 3 263 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHS 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (°/a) 0 2 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 1 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 Confi oration LT R / G f1IP'II �rjn(T1TY1Pntc U/7(1on A 041 (1Cot+: rage 1 of l Control Uela , Queue Len th, Level of Service proach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 1 12 Lane .Configuration L LT R Volume,v (vph) 213 134 263 Capacity, cm (vph) 1378 253 746 fc ratio 0.16 0.53 0.35 Queue length 95% 0.56 2.84 1.59 Control Delay s/veh 8.1 34.2 12.4 LOS q D B Approach delay (slveh) -- - 19-8 Approach LOS -- -- C HCS2000""' Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4, ld .tt flip•//('•1T�nr•nmvntc°/7(l�nrifl/7llCart;�„T�,1A.�,,,;..:�+..,+..,.t7,,.,,,�°i�no,.+s;,.,..,tT,..-...,.t.,��.2-7nt...__ �rnr�nnn TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst gr enc /Co. Date Performed 3/2/2009 Analysis Time Period 1n peak raUr i 0l 471 Intersection Seahawks Wa /LWB Jurisdiction CL of Renton Analysis Year existing L T Project Description Hawks'Landing EastWest Street: Lake Wash. Blvd/NE 44th North/South Street: Seahawks Way__ Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Maior Street F Fagthniinrf nA Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 4 125 0 3 519 39 Peak -hour factor, L T R Volume veh/hj 1 0 PHF 0.95 1 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.97 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate 0.67 0.67 0.67 Hourly Flow Rate 1 (veh/h) 0 (veh/h 4 731 0 3 535 40 Proportion of heavy 3 3 3 Percent grade {%) 2 0 chicles, PHv -- -- 1 -- -- 11V1UUJdi i LyPe I 11nr1h1irlarl AT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR LTR stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 112 L T R L T R Volume veh/hj 1 0 6 31 0 4 Peak -hour factor, 0.58 PHF 0.58 0.58 0.67 0.67 0.67 Hourly Flow Rate 1 (veh/h) 0 10 46 0 5 Proportion of heavy chicles, PHu 0 0 0 3 3 3 Percent grade {%) 2 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Confi oration LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service proach EB I WB I Northbound Southbound file //( lf�nr.��mHntca/�flan.��17R P+r;,, �1 AAm -;.X. tr +_,%T I -r - ;V (A'' JLUP 4UliLI W rage! or 2 Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR LTR LTR Volume, v v h) 4 3 11 51 Capacity, cm (vph) 1003 1460 804 356 /c ratio 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.14 Queue length (95% 0.01 0.07 0.04 0.50 Control Delay s/veh 8.6 7.5 9.5 16.8 LOS A A A C Approach delay s/veh) _ -- 9.5 16.8 roach LOS -- -- A C HCS200OT M Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d i�a'//(-'•innoim ante/'?lln n.all/'±fiC.'a41:.-i r.r.1 A r1.Y.;T.. �.1...,+,...57 ,.,,,,10!'l fl�'�+r=�......1 'i',.��.5„11�0>✓ n + '?!l 1 1'�llllll - --- .. I -- _-, .,._... -. ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS Information Site Information Analyst gr Agency/Co. Date Performed 03/11/09 Analysis Time Period AM.peak Intersection urisdiction nalvsis Year -rdgc 1 01 L 44th Stree0-405 Ni: imps y of Renton/WSDOT 11 - base conditions Project ID Hawks'Landing EastlWest Street: NE 44th Street North/South Street: I-405 NB Ram /LWB Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume 313 117 381 171 173 0 %Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume 10 98 95 30 28 361 %Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration L TR L T L TR LTR PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.94 0.86 Flow Rate 363 579 198 201 215 485 Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 10 2 No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 Geometry Group 5 5 2 1 2 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left -Tums 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Prop. Right -Turns 0,0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.9 Prop. Heavy Vehicle hLT-adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1,7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 9.11 9.11 9.11 9.11 9.19 1 9.11 Departure Head ay and Service Time hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 initial 0.32 0.51 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.43 hd, final value 9.11 9.11 9.11 9.11 9.11 9.11 x, final value 0.92 1.29 0.53 0.51 0.53 1.00 Move -up time, m 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0 Service Time 6.8 5.7 6.8 5.7 6.8 5.7 6.8 5.7 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound f1iP'//r~'�r�ffliimnn}c ��}r�'a L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 - 3 1'r'1�/71}G'atfinrtnl A ---- T. ur � LUF � U21 Ll vx Page '_� of 1 HCS2000"" Copyright (D 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d file II( •I tl nrnma,�+�a/ i(1� 70/')(IQ +r: .. 5 A a +_ +--IT lA/ TA0 Capacity 396 579 373 394 399 485 Delay 57.50 170.55 22.51 20.69 21.59 68.91 LOS F F C C C 11 F Approach: Delay 126.98 21.59 21.59 68.91 LOS F C C F Intersection belay 81,48 Intersection LOS F HCS2000"" Copyright (D 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d file II( •I tl nrnma,�+�a/ i(1� 70/')(IQ +r: .. 5 A a +_ +--IT lA/ TA0 v« k vlc ami raVu 1 U! G Movement 1 2 3 4 6 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 734 6 406 142 0 Peak -hour factor, T Upstream Si nal 0 PHF 1-00 0.82 0.82 0.88 0.88 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate Southbound Movement (veh/h 0 895 7 461 161 0 Proportion of heavy L T R L T ehicles, PHV 0 -- -- 4 -- -- pvit man ivpe I IInrlivirlprf I RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 56 1 126 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1 00 1.00 1.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 Hourly Flow Rate (vehlh 0 0 0 69 1 155 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 3 3 3 Percent grade (%) 0 2 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 1 Configuration LT R �1 fila 11( •1Yin �5ma:+r0/ 7(1r. �/_ 1(1Co++; 1 A A—: -,,+...,+,.,A7 i Yrv" rY µ' LJ Ili' L 111 U LSA rage /- of Uontrol Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement [ 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Confi uration L LT R Volume, v (vph) 461 70 156 Capacity, cm (vph 746 26 881 /c ratio 0.62 2.69 0.18 Queue length 96% 4.34 8.56 0.64 Control Delay s/veh 17.3 1083 10.0 LOS C F A Approach delay s/veh `- -- 343.9 Approach LOS -- -_ F HCS2000, " Copyright Q 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved version 4.1d rt F1 1,104') 1W�tt; laic 1 ut_ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Sita infnrmnfinn Analyst gr Eastbound Intersection Sea hawks Wa /L WB Agency/Co. Jurisdiction Cit of Renton Date Performed 03/11/09 Analysis Year 2011 - base condition Analysis sis Time Period am peak - r�ect Des cri tion Hawks' Landin ast/VVest Street: Lake Wash. Blvd/NE 44th North/South Street: Seahawks Wa ntersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs): 0.25 /ehicle Volumes and Adiustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R i_ T R Volume (veh/h) 16 705 3 4 208 67 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.76 0.76 0.76 Hourly Flow Rate Leh/h) 18 819 3 5 273 88 Proportion of heavy chicles, PHV Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR LTR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street NorthboundSouthbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 0 2 33 1 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.69 0.69 0,69 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 0 4 47 1 4 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 11 11 11 Percent grade (°/a) 2 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Confi uration I LTR Control Delay, Queue I_en th, Level of Service pproach I EB I WB Northbound Southbound f;la•!1f'•1T1 ,�„�„�„+,a/.. 7n, Saf_ TnC�rr: ,,,1 n A t YY V' Y'Y ii J' UiV�.J lr V1J.LI VA j'Q�C �, Ul � Movement 1 4 7 8 9 19 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR LTR LTR Volume, v (vph) 18 5 4 52 Capacity, cm (vph) 1203 812 378 165 /c ratio 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.32 Queue length 95%} Q_45 0.02 0.43 1.27 Control Delay (s/veh ) 8.0 9.5 14.6 36.8 LOS A A B E Approach delay (slveh) 14.6 36,6 roach LOS -- -- B E HCS20001m Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d s�a•r�r�.ir� ,,�.� oi�n aoi�nc +t:�,. ti A A—; ...... 4--1r ,.,-7O1.')nc M.;r r clb0 1 UA ! Volume ustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Movement L T R Volume 73 160 73 ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information R 0 Site Information 50 Intersection NE 44th Street/l-405 NB Ramps nal st gr enc fCo. Jurisdiction City of Renton/1WSDOT Date Performed Q3/11/09 Analysis Year 2091 -base condition Analysis Time Period PM peak Movement Project ID Hawks` Landin T R East/West Street: NE 44th Street North/South Street: 1-405 NB Rem /L WB Volume ustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Movement L T R Volume 73 160 73 L 79 Westbound T 150 R 0 %Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume 11 280 174 56 23 308 %Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration L TR L 7 L TR L TR PHF 0.93 0.93 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.88 Flow Rate 78 250 87 166 504 1 439 % Heavy Vehicles 1 1 1 1 2 1 No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 Geometry Group 5 5 2 2 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Head ay Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left -Turns 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Prop. Flight -Turns 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.8 Prop, Heavy Vehicle hLT-adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 9.31 9.31 9.31 9.31 9.31 9.31 Departure Head ay and Service Time hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 , initial 0.07 0.22 0.08 0.15 0.45 0.39 hd, final value 9.31 9.31 9.31 9.31 9.31 9.31 final value 0.20 0.59 0.23 0.42 1.01 0.88 Move -up time, m2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0 Service Time 7.0 6.3 7.0 &.3 7.0 6.3 7.0 6.3 Capacitygapacity and Leel of Service Eastbound V Z�!;Fh7und Northbound _ Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 F1IP.'I/'�T7nr7iYnPrfC�I�1(Ianr��/7f�CptYin�e`d L2 '2r1it,)nnn l�xx- VY Uy OeLfjj %—ulium Fage 2 oft HCS20001m Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d films•/IC'•ZTlnriima��tc�/7(1+�nr10!`7(1C'a#:,,r,��1 Arl..,;�.:n+.-.,*,,..11',...,.10/�nC,.fE;.,..,,1•r,...,.,..5..�fl.PTIA ?!11 !%1iiYlrl Capacity 328 407 337 381 504 496 Delay 14.35 23.02 15.14 18.08 70.78 42.68 LOS 8 C C C F E Approach: Delay 20,96 17.07 70.78 42.68 LOS C C I F E Intersection Delay 43.05 Intersection LOS E HCS20001m Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d films•/IC'•ZTlnriima��tc�/7(1+�nr10!`7(1C'a#:,,r,��1 Arl..,;�.:n+.-.,*,,..11',...,.10/�nC,.fE;.,..,,1•r,...,.,..5..�fl.PTIA ?!11 !%1iiYlrl I .. - Y. uy OLVIJ %_Uiiuve TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst r Agency/Co. Date Performed 03/11/09 Analysis Time Period pm peak rage 1 oz Intersection NE 44th Streer`/1-405 Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period hrs : 0.25 SB Ramps Jurisdiction City of Movement 1 Renton/WSDOT Analysis Year 2011- abase 5 conditions L T Project Description Hawks'Landing East/1/1/est Street: NE 44th Street North/South Street: 1-405 SB Ram s Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 167 27 220 315 0 Peak -hour factor, 1.00 PHF 0.84 0.84 0.96 0.96 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 0 veh/h 198 32 229 3.28 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 -- -- 1 -- _- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal 0 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 0 0 133 3 288 Peak -hour factor, 1,00 PHF 1.00 1.00 0-97 0,97 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate 0 veh/h 0 0 137 3 296 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 2 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 4lh•1lF-11l + o/111., an/ tnC +: „1 n a—__:_. ...... 1T _„1n/"111['0 . .._.. ti"r__--.-N..ni-nr,r. rr. rnnnn I 'Yv— rr cry L�LVl1 �VAlil U1 rage , or /- . ,Configuration LT R Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT R Volume, v (vph) 229 149 296 Capacity, cm (vph) 1344 225 718 Ic ratio 0.17 0.62 0.41 Queue length 95%) O' 61 3.67 n 2.03. Control Delay slveh) $ 2 44 2 13,5 LOS A E B Approach delay (s/veh). 23.3 roach LOS -- -- C HCS2000'm Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.3d fig-/If'•1T"1r....,T„a.,,two%'?�1.,..a0f_'rfl�„f+;..,.,,1 n a�.__..�.�..,,.tr_.,,.��i�nn....:__w_i^r_.__._�._�t.nr�n. n» f innnn TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Genera[ Information Site Information Analyst gr Agency/Co. Date Performed 311112009 nal sis Time Period Ipm peak �)ro•ect Descri tion Hawks` Landin � -astJWest Street: Lake Wash. BlvdINE 44t, ntersection Orientation: East-West lehicle Volumes and Adjustments Aaior Street 7 Eastbound intersection Seahawks Wa /LWB JurisdictionCif of Renton Analysis Year 2011 -.base conditions. L T 'South Street: Seahawks Way .Period (hrs): 0.25 RXIM-nTemyff TOM Movement 1 2 3 4 6 6 L T R L T R Volume (vehlh) 4 148 0 3 578 41 Peak -hour factor, R Volume (vehlh) 1 0 6 32 0-95 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.97 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate 0.67 Hourly Flow Rate 1 (vehlh 0 10 47 vehlh 4 155 0 3 595 42 Proportion of heavy 3 Percent grade {%) 2 0 Flared approach N vehicles, PHV_- N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 1VIUUi&fI Lype I undivided RT Channelized? I I n n 1 1 0 0 1 0 i oration L TR LTR kLanes ream Si nal 0 0 r Street Northbound Southbound ement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vehlh) 1 0 6 32 0 4 Peak -hour factor, 0.58 PHF 0.58 0.58 0.67 0.67 0.67 Hourly Flow Rate 1 (vehlh 0 10 47 0 5 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 3 3 3 Percent grade {%) 2 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 1_anes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Confi uration I LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Fila•//('•lr�nri�mantca/..7Ranrin/,.7flCattir.nclGram;.,;o4rnrnrlT"�..�la/711Co++:��,n1To��-.,.1.,'7111?(�+ n!'1/'�r1(l� 1 "V— TV Gay OLVP LVIILLVI rage % oz .4 roach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR LTR LTR olume, v (v h) 4 3 11 52 Capacity, cm (vph) 951 1439 762 314 Ic ratio 0,00 6.60 0.01 0.17 Queue length 95% 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.58 Control Delay S/veh 8.8 7.5 9.8 18.7 LDS A A A C pproach delay Wveh �_ -- 9.8 18.7 roach LDS -- -- A C HCS2000"M Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All. Rights Reserved Version 4.1d i:,tA•/!'•11inn„mp.,,+r0/'?n.,,,.ao�'�nC�++:,,r.,,ln.7,,,1'1f'-+ A/IP)flnn ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS eneral information Site Information na! st r enc ICo. Date Performed 03/91109 nal sis Time Period 'AMpeak Intersection 11 F Jurisdiction C nalvsis Year 2 44th Streetlf-405 Nf mps y of RentonlWSDOT 11 - w1hotel comroonE ro'ect ID Hawks'Landin Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ast/West Street: NE 44th Street NorthlSauttt Street: 1-405 NB Ram /LWB L2 olume Adjustments and Site Characteristics L2 L1 L2 Configuration roach Eastbound T L TR Westbound L TR ovement L T R L T R glume 314 119 392 171 175 0 Thrus Left Lane 50 245 50 % Heavy Vehicles roach Northbound 2 10 1 Southbound 2 ovement L T R L T R glume 38 98 95 30 28 1 363 Thrus Left Lane 50 2 50 2 Duration, I Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration L TR L T L TR L TR P H F 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.94 0.86 Plow Rate 365 593 198 203 245 488 % Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 10 1 2 No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 Geometry Group 5 5_- 2 2 Duration, I Saturation Head ay Adjustment Worksheet _0._25 Prop. Left -Turns 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 Prop. Right -Turns 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.9 Prop. Meavy Vehicle hLT-adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0,7 1 -0,7 1 -0.6 1 -0.6 1 -0.6 1 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1 1.7 1 1.7 1 1.7 1.7 1 1.7 hadj, computed 9.29 9.29 9.29 1 9.29 1 9.29 1 9.29 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.32 0.53 0.18 a 18 0.22 0.43 hd, final value 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 , final value 0.94 1.35 0.54 0.52 0.61 1.04 Move -up time, m 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0 Service Time 7.0 5.9 7.0 5.9 7.0 5.9 7.0 5.9 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound riP'���'•�rinrsimantc4/'7no�r10/7C1Cc++4;nnnSnrl.�,;n:�r.,4r...lf......14/.`1nC'.,d+;....,,1'f'.,_.,,-,Y.,7S,nnc L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 ^111!']lllln I .,A- 11 uy ututj 4VAA1.AVA gage z or l'ICS2000'm Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. F:lo•//l 1r1,.,,, o, + o/. Tn 7oi lncry �,: ti n a,_:__: .�-'---tr , _„ininnv n Version 4.1d Capacity 388 593 366 387 396 488 Delay 63.06 195.85 23.22 21.53 25.22 79.38 LOS. F F C C D F Approach: Delay 145.25 22.37 25.22 79.38 LOS F C D F Intersection Delay 92.28 intersection LOS F l'ICS2000'm Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. F:lo•//l 1r1,.,,, o, + o/. Tn 7oi lncry �,: ti n a,_:__: .�-'---tr , _„ininnv n Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Isite Information Analyst gr enc /Co. Date Performed 03/11/09 Analysis Time Period am peak I ast V1 L Intersection NE 44th Street/1-405 Westbound SB Ramps Jurisdiction City of 3 RentoniWSDOT Analysis Year 2011 - wlhotei component T R Project Description Hawks'Landing EastlWest Street: NE 44th Street North/South Street. 1-405 SB Rames Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adiustrnents Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 0 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 748 24 406 174 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 0.82 0.82 0.88 0.88 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 912 29 461 197 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 -- -- 4 -- Median pe Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 0 0 56 1 144 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 0 0 69 1 177 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 3 3 3 Percent grade (%) 0 2 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 1 11 i;la•!f!'`•171�,r..,.,,ori+.,U/_'?fl.,.,.;0/1flC',�+r;.,.�.,1 A ,7..,:�,:„+,..,s,,,.1T,,,.,,701r}!tC„++:-..r�.,lT....,,,�,i.,`]lrnl ? + '? li l Ihllll(1 i IV v- YY 4Y ULM'P t.. Vll ll vl Confi uration I I I I LT Page L of Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service roach . EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT R Volume, v vph 461 70 177 Capacity, cm (vph) 720 22 842 v/c ratio 0.64 3.18 0.21 Queue length (95%) 4.67 8.94 0.79 Control Delay (slveh) 18.5 1349 10.4 LOS C F 8 Approach delay (s/veh) T� 389.8 roach LOS -- __ F FfCS2000' m Copyright () 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4,1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Genera! Information ISite Information Analyst r Agency/Co. Date Performed 03/11/09 Analysis Time Period am peak I agv I VIL Intersection Seahawks Way/LWB Jurisdiction City of Renton Analysis Year 2011 - w1hotel com anent Movement 1 2 ro ect Description Hawks' Landin East/West Street: Lake Wash. Blvd/NE 44thNorthlSouth Street: Seahawks Way Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 18 732 0 0 258 67 Peak -hour factor, 0.86 PHF 0.86 0.86 0.76 0.76 0.76 Hourly Flow Rate 20 (vehlh) 851 0 0 339 88 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHU 1 -- -- 1 -- -- Median pe Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR LTR Upstream Signal 1 0 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vehlh) 0 0 5 33 0 6 Peak -hour factor, 0.50 PHF 0.50 0.50 0.69 0.69 0.69 Hourly Flow Rate 0 (vehlh) 0 10 47 0 8 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 11 11 11 Percent grade (°/a) 2 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service �)A•//f`-11'1�,,,,,,,,o„r�o/'7(1�.,.7o/'1f1C�++;,,,,�1n,�,.,:r:�,,,..,�,...t1,,,.,,�oi�n�,.++:.,....��r,,.,,.�t.,ni.ii�r�� ni�r�nnn 1 YVv� YY uy L7 LVkJ VV{ALA Vl 1"aae > 012 Aeeroac;h EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR LTR LTR Volume, v (v h) 20 0 10 55 Capacity, cm (vph) 1138 792 363 148 Cc ratio 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.37 Queue length 95 % 0.05 0.00 o. os 1.55 Control Delay (slveh 8.2 9.5 15.2 43.0 LOS A A C E Approach delay s/veh) -_ -- 15.2 43.0 roach LOS _- __ C F I-ICE20001 'm Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d 4i I. l/n.171 ,o + o/7n aai�nr a+:�� ti n a ;..; _ r jninnn-s: -- ''- -,_, I,%A ,,N 11nAA ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS Information Site Information Analyst gr Agency/Co. Date Performed 03/11/09 Analysis Time Period PM peak Intersection Jurisdiction i" nalvsis Year 44th Ops of i - u x a6%. 1 v1 T Project ID Hawks'Landin EastlWest Street: NE 44th Street NorthlSo ith Street: 1-405 N6 Ram /LWB glume Adjustments and Site Characteristics p roach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R alums 74 162 88 79 152 0 °/oThrus Left Lane 50 50 p roach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume 37 280 174 56 23 310 %Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Li L2 Configuration L TR L T LTR LTR PHF 0.93 0.93 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.88 Flow Rate 79 268 87 168 533 441 % Heavy Vehicles 1 1 1 1 ::2:= 1 No. Lanes 2 2 1 Geometry Group 5 5 2 2 Duration, T 0 25 Saturation Head ay Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left -Turns 1.0 0.0 1.0 0,0 0.1 0.1 Prop. Right -Turns 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.8 Prop. Heavy Vehicle hLT-adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0,2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 9.37 9.37 9.37 9.37 9.37 9.37 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.07 0.24 0.08 0.15 0.47 0.39 hd, final value 9.37 9.37 9.37 9.37 9.37 9.37 final value 0.21 0.64 0.23 0.43 1.10 0.90 Move -up time, m 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0 Service Time 7.1 6.3 7.1 6.3 7.1 6.3 7.1 6.3 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 I L2 I L1 I L2 L1 I L2 L1 I L2 tile://C:1Docuznents%20aiid%20SettillgslAdministrator\Local%20SettingslTemplu2k919.t.,, 3/11/2009 rage Z 01 i HCS2000'm Copyright Q 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d tile:i/C:\Documents%20and%20Settin.oslAdministrator\Local%20SettinQslTeninlLt2k919.t... 3/11/2009 Capacity 329 407 337 378 533 488 Delay 14.47 25.25 15.33 18.54 96.24 46.00 LOS 8 D C C F E Approach: Delay 22.80 17.45 96.24 46.00 LOS C C F E Intersection Delay 53.26 intersection LOS F HCS2000'm Copyright Q 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d tile:i/C:\Documents%20and%20Settin.oslAdministrator\Local%20SettinQslTeninlLt2k919.t... 3/11/2009 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General information Site Information Analyst gr enc /Co. Date Performed 03/11/09 Analysis Time Period pm peak L GAG i V1 L Intersection NE 44th Streetlt-405 Movement 1 SB Ramps Jurisdiction City of 5 Renton/WSDOT Analysis Year 2.011 - w/hotel R component 1 777771 Project Descri tion Hawks'Landing EastlWest Street: NE 44th Street North/South Street: 1-405 SB Ramps Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 185 50 220 345 0 Peak -hour factor, Upstream Signal I 1 0 PHF 1.00 0.84 0.84 0.96 0.98 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate Southbound Movement 7 8 veh/h 0 220 59 229 359 0 Proportion of heavy R L T R Volume veh/h) vehicles, PHV 0 -- -- 1 -- -- Eeoian Lvne I IInrfiv rlarf I RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal I 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 0 0 133 3 304 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 0 0 137 3 313 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade 4°fo} 0 2 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 1 file://C;1Documents%20and%20SettingslAdrninistratorlt,ocal%20Settin�-,s\Temt)\u2k9I CA... 3/11/2009 A LLgG L Vl .:.. Configuration I I I I LT R Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service roach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT R Volume, v h) 229 140 313 Capacity, .cm (vph) 1289 203 690 /c ratio 0.18 0.69 0.45 Queue length (95%) 0.64 4.31 2.37 Control Delay s/veh 8.4 54.8 14.5 LOS A F B Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 26.9 p roach LOS -- -- p 71 HC82000T M Copyright a 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4, l d file: //C.-W0Cumenls%2Qand%20 SettingslAdministratorlLocal%20SettinRs\TeM1)\U2k9t C.t... 3/11/2009 - r - - - rabe r or 2 Movement 1 2 3 4 - 5- T 6 L T R L T R Volume {vehlh) 6 184 0 0 624 49 Peak -hour factor, 0 Minor Street Northbound PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0-97 0.97 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate 9 10 11 1-2— vehlh) 6 193 0 p 643 42 Proportion of heavy 0 0 5 32 0 ehicles, PHV 1 .,- -- -_ 1 -- -_ ""Mall LyeeI Undivided RT Channelized? I I I n ., Lanes 1 7 0 0 1 D Configuration L ;1 TR LTR U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 g 9 10 11 1-2— L L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 5 32 0 7 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.67 0.67 0.67 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 0 8 47 0 10 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 3 3 3 Percent grade (%) 2 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 IConfig uration LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Length., Level of Service file://C:1Documetlts%20and%2QS ettingslAdrnini strator\Local%205ettinL)sll'eniplu2k 112F.t... 4/2/2009 Fage 2 Ot ) roach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR LTR LTR Volume, v vph) 6 0 8 57 Capacity, cm (vph) 913 1386 864 286 /c ratio 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.20 Queue length 95% 0. 02 D. oa D. D3 0.73 Control Delay (s/veh 9.0 7.6 9.3 20.7 LOS A A A C Pproach delay (s/veli -- - 9.3 20.7 roach LOS -- -- A C rrcZruuv' ' C;aPyright C0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d file://C:1Documents°/o20and%20SettinRs\Administrator\Local%s2OSettino,4\Ten,nlii7k1 17l' t-V1)1?nAo TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Isite Information nal st r Agency/Co. Date Performed 416/2009 [Analysis Time Period jam peak Project Description Hawks Landin2 Hotel East/West Street: Lake Washington Blvd. intersection Orientation: East-West Fm ehicle Volumes and Adjustments aior Street Fn-,thniinrl Page t of 'Z [Intersection Lake Wash. Blvd.lMain Access :Jurisdiction Renton Analysis Year 2011 orth/South Street: Main Access Ludy Period (Mrs): 0.25 Movement 1 2 3 4 6 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 688 6 53 208 0 Peak -Hour factor, 0 Minor Street Northbound PHF 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.76 0.76 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 9 10 11 12 (veh/h 0 799 6 69 273 0 Proportion of heavy 4 0 29 0 0 ehicles, PHv 0 -- -- 1 -- - IYIGUIdiI FSC Undivided RT Channelized? n Ir, Lanes 0 7 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h 4 0 29 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.80 1.00 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h) 4 0 36 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, Phu 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service tile://C:1Documents%20al3d%20Settinp-slAdrtiinistratorl[.nc:a1%7ilgettinoq\Tl}mn11,,?k96R t „I, Page L of ApEroach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R Volume, v (vph) 69 4 36 Capacity, cm (vph) 824 186 387 Ic ratio 0.08 0.62 0.09 Queue length 95% 0.27 0.07 0.31 Control Delay sfveh) 9.8 24.8 15.3 LOS A C C Approach delay (sfveh) _ - 16.2 PAP p roach LOS -- -_ C HCS2000""` Copyright 0432003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4_]d '2 file://C:1DOcLiments%20and%24Settinias\Administrator\Local%2(}SPttinsx�lTc rnnl,i,?k06R ruin 41il?n00 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst gr Agency/Co. Date Performed 4/6/2009 nal sis Time Period ipm j2eak rage i or Intersection Lake Wash. Blvd./Main Access Jurisdiction Renton Analysis Year 2011 Project Description Hawks LandinE Hotel EastlVllest Street: Lake Washington Blvd. North/South Street: Main Access Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 0 144 5 49 555 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 0,95 0.95 0.97 0.97 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h) 0 151 5 50 572 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Confi uration TR L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 5 0 38 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF Q.80 1.00 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 6 0 47 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 D 0 D 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 01 D 0 0 Confi uration L �, Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service •�J file, //C:1Documents%20and%20Settings\Administrator\Local%20SettinLs\Tema\ti2k96E.tmu /5/2009 I rr�- r. ay vLUP -1Uuuui Yaae ! 01.z Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L R Volume, v (vph) 50 6 47 Capacity, cm (vph) 9430 333 897 /c ratio 0.03 0.02 0.05 Queue length 95% 0.11 0.05 0.17 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 16.0 9.2 LOS A C A Approach delay (slveh) -- 10.0 Approach LOS -- — B HC52000' M Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d File:l'C:1Docunients%20and%2OSettinas\Administrator\Local%2OSetLinLs\Ten.D\u2k96F.tmi) 4/6/2009 ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS neral Information ISite Information 11 Analyst gr Agency/Co. Date Performed 03/11/09 Analysis Time Period AM peak Jurisdiction nalvsis Year vage 1 of 2 44th Streetll-405 NB mps L of ReantonlVVSDQT 71 w/hotel compone� PHF 0-86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.94 rJ Project ID Hawks'Landing 0.86 Flow Rate 365 138 198 203 EastlWest Street: NE 44th Street 205 North/south Street: 1-405 NB Ramp/LWB 464 Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics 2 �_2 2 Approach Eastbound 2 2 Westbound 2 Movement L T I R L T R Volume 314 119 392 171 175 0 %Thrus Left Lane 50 Duration, T 50 Approach Northbound Saturation Head ay Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume 36 98 95 30 28 363 °l%Thrus Left Lane 50 0.0 0.0 50 0.5 0.0 0.9 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration L T L T L TR L TR PHF 0-86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.94 0.94 0.86 0.86 Flow Rate 365 138 198 203 40 205 34 464 % Heavy Vehicles 2 �_2 2 210 10 2 2 No. Lanes 2 2 2 2 Geometry Group 5 5 5 5 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Head ay Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left -Turns 1.0 0.0 1.0 1 0.0 1,0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Prop. Right -Turns 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.9 Prop. Heavy Vehicle hLT-adj 0,5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 hRT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 8.46 8.46 8.46 8.46 8.46_ 8.46 8.46 8.46 Departure Head ay and Service Time hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3,20 x, initial 0.32 0.12 0.18 0.18 0.04 0.18 0.03 0.40 hd, final value 8.46 8.46 8.46 8.46 8.46 8.46 8.46 8.46 fins! value 0.86 0.31 0.48 0.46 0,10 0.48 0.08 0.93 Move -up time, m 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Service Time 6.2 1 .7 6.2 5.7 6.2 5.7 6.2 5.7 CapaciV and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound file://C:1Documents%20and%2OSettin�zslAdmizustratorlLocal%20Settinp-slTemi:)\u2k 184. t... 3/19/2009 4 --- YY LLJ' JLvf1 VVi1Li L11 rage 2 o 2 HCS2000 "" Copyright Q 2003 University of Florida, All Rights. Reserved Version 4.1d file://C:\Documents%20and%20SettinvslAdministratorlLocal%2QSettin!slTerriolu2k184.t... 3/19/2009 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity 422 388 401 424 290 414 284 487 Delay 44.66 14.12 19.20 17.82 12.94 18.41 11.94 51.27 LOS E B C C B C B F Approach- Delay 36.28 18.50 17.51 48.53 LOS E C C E Intersection Delay 32.77 Intersection LOS p HCS2000 "" Copyright Q 2003 University of Florida, All Rights. Reserved Version 4.1d file://C:\Documents%20and%20SettinvslAdministratorlLocal%2QSettin!slTerriolu2k184.t... 3/19/2009 ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information ISite information Analyst r enc fCo. Date Performed 03111109 Analysis Time Period PM 2eak ragr, 1 01L Intersection NE 44th Street/1-405 NB Ramps Jurisdiction City of Renton/WSDDT Analysis Year 2011 w/hotei component; 1 i f le:/IC:1Documents%20ar,d.%2QSettings%Adi nistrator\Local%2QSettinc-,s\Temn1ti2k900.t... 3/19/2009 Pro ect ID Hawks' Landing East(West Street: NE 44th Street North/South Street: 1.405 NB Ram ILWB Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume 74 162 1 88 79 152 0 %Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Approach !Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume 3LU 280 174 56 23 310 %Thrus Left Lane 50 1 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Ll L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Configuration L T L T L TR L TR PHF 0.93 0.93 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.88 0.88 Flow Rate 79 i 174 87 168 40 493 63 378 Heavy Vehicles 1 I 1 1 1 2 2 1-1 1 No. Lanes 2 2 2 2 Geometry Group 5 5 5 5 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left -Turns 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Prop. Right -Turns 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.9 Prop. Heavy Vehic}e hLT-adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 hRT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 8.43 1 8.43 8.43 8.43 8.43 1 8.43 1 8.43 8.43 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 initial 0.07 0.15 0.08 0.15 0.04 0.44 0.06 0.34 hd, final value 8.43 8.43 8.43 8.43 8.43 8.43 8.43 8.43 x, final value 0.18 0.38 0.20 0.37 0.08 0.93 0.14 0.70 Move -up time, m 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Service Time 6.1 15.6 6.1 5.6 6.1 5.6 6.1_L 5.6 Ca aci and Levet of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound f le:/IC:1Documents%20ar,d.%2QSettings%Adi nistrator\Local%2QSettinc-,s\Temn1ti2k900.t... 3/19/2009 A -- Y "Y 0WIJ UVll Li U1 Page 2 of) HCS2006'm Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d file ://C:1Documents%20and%20SettinQ:s\Administrator\Local%,20Settings\Temn\ 10k9OO t L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity 329 424 3.37 418 290 525 313 530 Delay 13.03 15.47. 13.27 15.20 10.99 50.30 11.70 23.12 LOS B C B C B F B C Approach: Delay 14.70 14.54 47.35 21.49 LOS B B 1✓ C Intersection Delay 28.44 Intersection LOS D HCS2006'm Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d file ://C:1Documents%20and%20SettinQ:s\Administrator\Local%,20Settings\Temn\ 10k9OO t ral2c i W fMMgU17 iff fe ME liffiriN HCS2000rM DETAILED REPORT General Information NB Site Information Analyst gr LT Intersection 1405 NB Ramps/NE Agency or TH RT 44th St. Co. LT Area Type All other areas Date 3/19/2009 Jurisdiction WSDOT/Renton Performer! Analysis Time Period am peak Year 2011 - w/hotel -mit. 1 9 Project 10 Hawks' Landin ' fMMgU17 iff fe ME liffiriN file ://C:IDocuments%20and%2OSettinbsl,Admir_istratorlLocal%20Sett:ngslTernp1s211»7.t... "D/19/2409 EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH Number of lanes, N 1 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 9 1 Lane group L T R L T R L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 314 119 392 171 175 146 38 98 95 30 28 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 10 10 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 10.86 0.94 0.94 4.94 0.86 0.86 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2-0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3-0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filteringlmetering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.040 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 demand, Q Ped I Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 92.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 112.0 12.0 Parking I Grade ! Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 file ://C:IDocuments%20and%2OSettinbsl,Admir_istratorlLocal%20Sett:ngslTernp1s211»7.t... "D/19/2409 rade 1 of s Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, N g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left EB Only TRT & 04 Excl. left TRT & 07 08 Timing 4.0 G= 40 40 G= G= 5.0 26.0 G= G= Y= 4.5 1 Y= 4.5 Y= 4.5 Y= Y= 4 Y- 4.5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 - Cycle Length, C - 85.0 Lane GroupCa acit ; Control Dela , and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 365 138 1456 199 1203 170 40 205 35 455 Lane group capacity, c 469 493 596 292 1307 261 97 489 104 491 v/c ratio, X 0.78 0.28 0.77 0.68 0.66 0.65 0.41 0.42 0.34 0.93 Total green ratio, g/C 0.26 0.26 0.38 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.06 0.31 0.06 0.31 Uniform delay, 28.9 24.8 23.2 33.4 33.3 33.2 38.6 23.5 38.4 28.6 1 Progression actor, PP 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.33 0.11 0.32 0.25 10.24 0.23 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.44 Incremental delay, d2 8.1 0.3 5.9 6.4 15.2 5.7 2.8 0.6 1.9 23.8 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 37.1 25.1 29.1 39.8 36.5 38.9 41.4 24.1 140.3 52.4 Lane group LOS D C C D D D D C D D Approach delay 31.6 39.1 26.9 51.5 C D C D file://C:\DOCLLments%20and%20Settinvs\AdministratorTocaI%2OSettinLys\Ten-inlG2.k')17.t._/190009 Approach LOS Intersection delay 37.3 X = 0.81 Intersection LOS D HCS2000° J" Copyri-ltt C) 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 e L' - l file://C:IDocuments%20and%20 SettingslAdrnitiistrato.rlLocal%2QSettingslxeznpls2k337.t... 3/19/2009 va.�auc:u ikc�ua t rage 3 01 -) Approach LOS Intersection delay 30.0 XC = 4.60 Intersection LOS C HCS.20001"I Copyribht © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version, 4.1e file://C:1Doeuments%20and%205 ettingslAdministratorl1.ocal%20SettingslTemp\s2k337.t... 3/19/2009 ✓viu�iyµ A4y�.lv1 �. HCS2000� DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst gr Agency or NE 44th Sf_/1-405 SS Intersection Co. Ramps Date Area Type A!1 other areas Performed 3/19/2009 Jurisdiction WSDOT Time Period am peak Analysis Year 2011 - w/hote! - mit. Project 1D Hawks'Landing Volume and Timing!nput ES WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N� 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Lane group T R L T LT R Volume, V (vph) 748 24 406 174 56 1 144 % Heavy vehicles, % HV 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.82 0.82 0,88 0.88 0.81 0,81 0.81 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2-0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 7.000 1,000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q b 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking 1 Grade 1 Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 2 N Parking maneuvers, N M Buses stopping, N$ J 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Min. time for file://C:1Doctu-rents%20and%20Settin;s\AdministratorlLacal%20Settings1'rempls2kl9C.t_.. 3/19/2009 1JCiLQi1Gl! 1\G�_1VA i pedestrians, GP 3,2 3.2 3.2 Phasing -WB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing 22.0 49,4 G- G- 15.0 G G G Y= 4.5 Y= 5 Y= Y- Y= 4.5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C 100.0 Lane Group Cal2acity, Control Dela , and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, 912 29 461 196 I 70 178 Lane group capacity, c 922 784 463 1407 261 233 We ratio, X 0.99 10.04 1.00 0.14 0.27 0.76 Total green ratio, g/C 0.49 10.49 0.75 0.75 0.15 0.15 Uniform delay, d� 25.2 13.2 32.9 3.4 37.6 40.8 Progression factor, PF 7.040 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.49 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.32 Incremental delay, d2 26.9 0.0 40.6 0.0 0.6 14.0 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 52.1 13.3 73.5 13.4 38.2 54. S Lane group LOS D B E A D D Approach delay 50.9 52.5 50.1 Approach LOS D ❑ D Intersection delay 51.4 X c = 0.94 Intersection LOS D HCS2000;f'' Copyright 0 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e ,5. tile://C:1❑ocuments%20,nd%20Settin�aslAdn iinistrator\Local%2OSettitiQslTemo\s2ki 9C.t_.. 3/13/2009 I-ugc i ()l /_ HCS2000'M DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst gr Agency or 44th St./�-405 SB Intersection Co_ Ra Ramps Date Area Type All other areas Performed 311912009 Jurisdiction WSDOT Time Period pm peak Analysis Year 2017 - w/hotel -mit.:. Project ID Hawks' Landing ' Volume and TimingInput EB WB NB SB LT1 TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Lane group T R L T LT R Volume, V (vph) 185 50 220 345 1 1 133 3 304 % Heavy vehicles, % HV 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.96 0.96 0.37 0.97 0.97 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective teen, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.a 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q b 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped I Bike / RTQR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade I Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 2 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 a o 0 Min. time for file.//C:1Docuinents%20and%20Settings\AdministratorlLocal%20Settin�slTempls2klB6.t... '3/19/2009 1/VLLLl- ; ,VW1L rage z OT L pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasin WB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 18.0 G= 23.0 G G- G= 25.0 G G G- Y= 4.5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 4.5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Groyp Capacity, Control Dela , and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, 1220 60 229 359 140 313 Lane group capacity, c 541 460 688 1070 560 500 We ratio, X 0.41 10.13 0.33 0.34 0.25 0.63 Total green ratio, g/C 0.29 0.29 0.57 0.57 0.31 0.31 Uniform delay, d1 23.0 21.1 9.0 9.2 20.5 23.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11-000 1.000 Delay calibration, k0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.21 Incremental delay, d2 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 2.5 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 23.5 21.2 9.3 9.4 20,7 26.0 Lane group LOS C C A A C C Approach delay 23.0 9.4 24.4 Approach LOS C A C Intersection delay 17.4 X c = 0.54 Intersection LOS B HCS20001R7 Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e file://C:1Documents%20and%20SettingslAdministratorlLocal%20Settin2slTemols2kl B6.t... 3/19/2009 i v* V- VY "Y L LV_p �-WILL V11 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst gr enc /Co. Date Performed 03/91109 nal sis Time Period jam peak ragtf 1 U1 G Intersection Seahawks Wa /LWB Jurisdiction City of Renton Analysis Year 2011 - w/hotei component - mit EastANest Street: Lake Wash. BIvdINE 44th North/South Street: Seahawks Way Intersection Orientation: East-West Project Description Hawks'Landing 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR EastANest Street: Lake Wash. BIvdINE 44th North/South Street: Seahawks Way Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Northbound Southbound Movement 7 Major Street Eastbound 10 11 12 Westbound L Movement 1 2 3 R 4 5 6 5 L T R Peak -hour factor, PHI= L T R Volume (vehih) 98 732 0 0 0 258 67 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0 0.76 0.76 0.76 Hourly Flow Rate vehlh) 20 851 0 2 0 339 88 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 1 -- -- Storage -- -- Median pe 0 Two Way Left Tum Lane 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR LTR Upstream Signal 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vehlh) 0 0 5 33 0 6 Peak -hour factor, PHI= 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.69 0.69 0.69 Hourly Flow Rate (vehlh) 0 0 10 47 0 8 Proportion of Meavy ehicles, PHv 0 0 0 11 19 19 Percent grade (%) 2 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service file://C:1Documents%20and%20SettinaslAcimirusti ator\Local%20Scttin tislTemn1u2k l 136. t... 4/2/2009 L VVV- VY ay Omp �_wluot rage L oz Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR LTR LTR glume, v vph) 20 0 10 55 Capacity, cn, (vph) 1138 792 363 263 v/c rati o 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.21 Queue length (95°iQ 0.05 0.00 0.08 0.77 Control Delay a/ve h ) 8.2 9.5 15.2 22.3 LOS A A C C Approach delay s/veh) -- -- 95.2 22.3 roach C HCS2000 M Copyrio-ht © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d File://C .\Documezrts%20and%20 Settings\Administrator\Local%20Settin�s\Temp\L32k 113 6.t... 4/2/2009 Traffic Counts ' TRAFFICOUNT, INC. P.O. Box 2508 OLYMPIA, WA 98507 t RENTON, WASHINGTON traffcount@msn.com File Name : GRT05501A (360)491-8116 1-405 NB RAMPSSite Code : 00000001 NE 44TH STStart Date : 2/24/2009 LGC# 01A GRT09040M Page Na : 1 i Grou s Printed- Prima 1-405 NB ONir6t RAMPS NE 44TH ST i I-405 NB ON/OFF RAMPS ] NE 44TH ST From North From East From South From West Stan Tittle '- Right _ Thru ; Lett _Track, nAToew I Right . Thru Left j Truck rya Y i Right Thru Left j buck I .yp iww i Right Thru - 1c}t - Truck APP -r i E. reui j u, w Irl. Total 47:09 AM 87 7 4 2 98 ; 10 54 16 0 82 25 25 4 0 54�-1���- �49 22 �54 3 125: 5 359 3fi4 07:15 AM ' 9i 3 6 2 100: 34 31 34 3 99 23 19 1 5 48 ! 105 22 77 5 204 ,' 15 451 466 07:30 AM ; 101 8 8 p 117 ! 49 47 40 3 136: 20 22 2 2 44 102 35 77 4 214 '1 9 511 520 01:45 AM 87. 5 9 _ _5 95 ; 38 _ 40 _ 51 _ 2 129 i 20 25 6 4 Sl 78 24_ 72 5 174 SS 449 4S5 Total + 360 23 27 4 414 I ].31 172 143 8 _ 445 ; 93 91 11 11 197 i 334 _ _ 103 280 17 717 - 45 1770 1815 08:00 AM 71 11 6 1 88 19 47 39 0 106 23 28 1 9 52 ! 66 27 55 4 148 14 393 407 08:15 AM 74 7 9 3 90 22 39 40 6 101 , 21 48 3 6 72 63 33 63 4 159 h 19 422 441 - 08:30 AM : 92 10 10 3 112 16 44 40 4 100 :` 36 27 4 6 67 ; 54 30 54 3 138', 16 417 433 r OB:aS AM 75 7 _ 10 _ 2 92 _ �- 1 5_ (5 3 25 27 3 56 . 45 22 40 7 1 17 320 347 `- Total 312 35 35 9 382 f�- --57 -- _29 159-- _3_6 _ _ 155 15 _4 - --381 105 130 12 24 w __ 247 22$ 1i2 -2:2 _107 ---18 - 552 1 -- _ -56 56 Y562 1626 Granq Tatat 672 58 62 19 792 1 198 331 298 23 827 198 221 25 35 444; 562 215 492 35 2.269 11t 3332 3443 Apprch °5 $4.$ 7.3 7.8 :23.9 40 36 ? 44.6 49.8 5.6 44.3 16.9 36.8 f Tatai % ! 20.2 1.7 1.9 23.8 5-9 9.9 8.9 24,8 5.9 6.6 0.8 13.3 16.9 6.5 14.6 36.1 3.2 96.8 1-405 NB ON/OFF RAMP TH ST _._ __.._ -, I-405 MB WdFF RAMPS a NE 44TH ST From North From East From South i From West TimeRight Thru Leit APP � Total ; Ri ht g I --- _...t_.______ Lett APP. I Right i Thru Left APP, - Right I - Thru Lett ...._._ App. - Int .----- Total -. . y �� Peak HouraAna1! Froml 07. 00 AM [0 08-45 AM - Peak i of 1 -Thru--- Total _ _ _ Total Total Peak Hour for Entire intersection Begins at 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 91 3 6 100 34 37. 34 99I, 28 19 1 46 105 22 77 204: 451 07:30 AM 101 8 8 117 49 47 40 136 1 20 22 2 44 102 35 77 214:' 511 07:45 AM 81 5 9 95 ! 38 40 51 129 20 25 6 51 78 24 72 174 449 08:00 AM i 71 11 6 88 19 47 i05 23 26 1 52 GG 27 55 148 393 Total Vglumc - 344 27 29 400': 140 ___ 165 _3_9_ _ 164 469 ' 91 94 10 195 351 108 261 740 1804 f App, Total 86 6.87.2 29.9 35.2 35 46.7 48.2 5.1 47.4 14.6 38 HF 85 P1 614 806 .855. .714 .$78 .804 .852Wi .813 ,839 417 .936 .836 .771 912 _ Peak How Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM • Peak lot 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: '':, 07 00 AM : 07.30 AM 0$:00 AM 07:15 AM +0 mins. 87 7 4 +15 91 98 ! 49 47 40 136 23 28 1 521 105 22 77 204 mins. _. 3 6 100 38 40 51 129 ' 21 48 3 72 102 35 77 214 - - *30 mins.: 101 8 8 117 19 47 39 106: 36 27 4 67 ' 76 24 72 174 .-_ mins.- 81 5 9 - ..._..__. _....------..._._.--- 96 22 ---..-------._.--._-._-__-_._ 39 40 101 - 25 27 ....-_._._....__--..,..---_._.___.._.._ 4 5G� 66 27 55 148 Volume TotalVoiume 360 23 27 410 128 173 170 471 145 130 12 - 247 - -. 351 _..------...-....-..._-_.--- 10s 281 740 95 App. Total 87.8 5,6 6.6 27.2 36.7 36.1 a2.5 526 4,g 47.4 14.6 38 ' PHr 891 719 750 876 ,653 .920 .833 .866 ; .729 .677 .7S0 .856 _ _: .636 .......7.912 .864 . TRAFFTCOUNT, INC. P.O. BOX 2508 OLYMPIA, WA 98507 iracount@msn,cam RENTON, WASHINGTON (360)491-8116 File Name : GRT05501 P I-405 NB RAMPS Site Code : 00000001 NE 44TH ST Start Date : 2/24/2009 LOC# 01 P GRT09040M f. Page No : 1 _ Grtau s Printed- Primary - .... ;..I 405 NB aNIOFF RAMP$ - NE 4ATW ST 11.405 NB ONIBFF RAMPS i.. Ni" 44TH 5T From North From East From South From West Start Tlrne Right - Thru Left Yruck f naP. Tow �84 Right I Thru I Left Truck -'-j7- �2 Ar p. mw Right I Thru Leh Trucq �- _ aoo tome !Right _ _ Thm lI Left _ • Truck i Aca Tom- ' 04:00 PM a 7 2 9512 39 59 , 32 71 0 4� 103 ! 21 26 20 Q 67 B 324 332 - 04:15 PM +, 90 2 14 2 196 6 32 18 4 56 40 $7 0 1 97 i 15 35 16 2 68 9 327 336 04:30 PM ' 100 6 14 2 120 13 37 20 2 70 31 53 5 i 89I 15 32 12 1 59 8 338 344 44:45 PM _ 83 5 10 0 9$ ; - � 7 37 11 0 55 1 32 58 5 1 95 I to 52 12 1 74 : 322 324 Total i 357 17 45 5 419T-"88 145_...__57 - 9----.-240L _ 135 239 10 7 364 j 61 145 62 4� _ 268 _2_ _ 25 _ 1311 1336 05:00 PM 65 7 12 3 84 : 20 42 17 1 79 ' 45 63 3 1 111 20 42 13 0 75 i 5 349 354 05:15 PM '. 84 7 12 0 103 0&30 PM ; 72 6 12 1 90 23 35 25 2 83 I 36 57 3 1 96 16 37 IS 1 71 I 4 353 357 � 19 34 24 1 77! 43 73 2 1 118: 15 35 21 2 71 5 356 381 05:45 PM 66 2 18 0 86 21 27 10 0 5$ I 43 T6 2 5 121 16 30 15 0 61 5 326 331 ' Total 287 22 54 4 363 83 138 76 4 297 sfi7 269 10 8 446 '�. _ f67 144 67 _ _ 3 278_ 19 1384 1403 i Grand Total 644 39 99 10 782 121 283 133 12 537, 302 508 20 15 830 ; 128 289 129 7 546 - 44 2695 2739 Apprch % ; 82.4 5 12.1 22.5 52.7 24.8 36.4 61.2 2,4 i 23.4 52.9 23.6 Total % ; 23.9 1.4 3.7 29 ! 4.5 10.5 4.9 2.9.9 11.2 18.8 0.7 30.8 j 4.7 10.7 4.8 20.3 1.6 98.4 /-405 NB ONIOFF RAlV1P5 _ �----� � _ N£ Gl4'FH ST __ _.._-___rI-d05 NB QNIQFF RA�NfPS -' _�-----Nt;'44TH ST _._, -- From North From I From East i From South From West Start Time Right 'I Thru Left APP• i Total Right- Thru Left ! APP Right Thru i� Left AAP' Right ' Thru Left : ? App' In[ Total - - Peak hour Analysis From 04;00 PM to 05:45 PM -Peak 1 of i - - Total Total :, Total .... Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 1 65 7 12 84 20 42 17 79 45 63 3 111 20 42 13 75 ; 349 - 05:15 PM 84 7 12 103 23 35 25 83 36 57 3 96 ' 16 37 18 71 : 353 05:30 PM 72 8 12 90 j 19 34 24 77 ! 43 73 2 118 15 35 21 71 356 _ 05:45 FM 1 66 2 i8 86 21 27 10 58 43 76 2 121 16 30 15 61 '. ourne- %APP-Tglal 79,1_,. : 83 138 78 297 167 269 10 _ a46 ...--- 67 -_.---.. --- __..�.____. 144 67 278 ' _32_6 _ 13$a Vota - - __ al --^- B,1 14,8 f 27.9 46.5 25.6 :, 37.4 60.3 2.2 24.1 51.8 24.1 �. 854 ---786 .750_ 681 ! .902 ,821., .-_760 _.._.--.----__._.__..__....._._....-_.. -_ .895: .928 885 .833 921' .836 .857 .798 -927 i .972 Peak Hour Analysis From 04.00 PM 10 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Seglns at: 04:00 PM 105:00 PM - 05:00 PM j 04:45 6) +0 mins. 84 4 7 95 1 20 42 17 79 45 63 3 111 10 52 12 74 +15 mins. 90 2 14 106 j 23 35 25 83', 36 57 3 96 20 42 13 75 - _ +30 mins. 100 s 14 120 •. 19 34 24 77 43 73 2 118 16 37 18 71 +45 mins, 1 83 5 10 - _._---'-----. __.--_ 98 21 27 10 58 ' 43,,,. 76 121. 15 35 21 71 1 7otai Volume I 357 17 45 - 419 r - 83 --'----- 138 _ _ _ 167 269 _ .--2,,. 10 __..._........- 446 ..-------._ f31 .._...... 166 B4 - ----- 291 %ARR.' Oq al 85.2 a,i 10.7 --� __ ..---.804- 27,9 46.5 28.6 37.4 60_.3 2.2 21 57 22 _.. -873 PHF .893 706 _ _ ... .902 ,821 - __-.-- - .760 .895x--928 .885- --...__,___ -,833 .921 763 .- .- .798 .762 .970 RENTON, WASHINGTON 1-405 NB RAMPS NE 44TH ST I_OC# 01 P GRT09040M TRAFFICOUNT, INC. P.O. BOX 2508 OLYMPIA, WA 98507 trafficcunt@msn.corn (360)491-8116 File Name : GRT05501 P Site Code : 00000001 Start Date .2124/2009 Page No :2 1405 NB ONIOFF RAMPS - - ..NE 44TH ST ?....1-405 NB ONIOFF RAMPS : NE 44TH ST - -- -- ,' From North F WRight From East From South From West r Start Time I Right Thru Left i APP Right Thru ° Left i RPP. I Right Thru t Left ! p' Right Thr.: Leit 'pp'Int. Total ! Total I Total North ! Total ; m Total . Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM •Peak _ 1 of 1 4_- 2 —. - i 15 .1 Peak Hour for Entire Inierseetfan aegins at 05:00 PM W Ify 05:00 PM ; 65 7 12 84 ' 20 42 17 79 ; 45 63 3 111 20 42 13 75 '', 349 0515 PM '. 84 7 12 in ''�. 23 35 25 83 1 36 57 3 Be : 16 37 18 71 353 05:30 PM 72 6 12 90 19 34 24 77 i 43 73 2 118 15 35 21 71 ': 366 OS45 PM i 66 2 18 86 21 27 10 58; 43 76 2 121 - 16 30 15 61 326 Total Volume - 287 22 54 363 83 138 76 237 167 269 10 446 67 144 67 _ 278 1384 -% App. Total 79.1 6.1 14.9 1 27.9 46,5 25-6 37.4 60.3 2.2 i 24.1 51.8 24.1 PHF._.-......_�_._._.__..—. 554 .786 — .750 .881 - .902 .S22 .760 .895 ' .928 .885 .833 .923 .838 .857 .798 .927. .972 4ul In Total 419'x. i 363i F WRight Thru Left r i 3 Peak Hour Data +r-; North m m F71 -- i ,Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM 4_- 2 —. ;.. < i 15 .1 W Ify Left Thru Right 10 259'x.1671 - 165 44611, i 611 . Out In Tolal I-405 PB 0NICFF RAMPS TRAFFICQUNT, INC. P.O. BOX 2508 OLYMPIA, WA 98507 RENTON, WASHINGTON trafficount@msn.com (360)491-8116 File Name : GRT05502A 1-405 SS RAMPS Site Code : 00000002 NE 44TH ST Stat Date : 2124/2009 L.00# 02A GRT09040M Page No : 1 Groups Prirrfed- Primary �! 405 Sg OFF RAiNF NE 44TH S7 1405 SB ON RAMP NE 44TH 5T From North From East South From So From West Sfart TiniB Right Thru ' Left Truck --- T. _-.�.._....�. __ . �.__ .. " tar i I Right j aFt T na , ._-_ ___ 14 0 11 0 25 -' Thru 18 - _ 3.eft Truck '--- I ppr T i a Rlghi ! Thr" i Leh Truck a aoa Tom i Alght 7itru -ww Left 1 7 ack _ nPa- .!?­t­ro_w me rorai , 0 07:15 AM', 33 0 it 104 1 122 ; 00 0 Q 0 !1 0 133 0 4 133 5 280 285 4 44 0 07;30AM ; 37 0 13 1 50 0 22 47 104 3 101 1 126 i 0 0 0 0 148 0 ! 1 187 0 3 188 10 358 368 ' 0745AM : 33 1 19 1 53 ' 0 46 a1 6 0 O 0 0 1.271 0__ 0 3 201 0 3 204 5 402 407 Total 117 i 54 6 172 ; O 133 390 10 _ 0 0 0 523 ; 0 0 0 0 __ 0 i_1 __ 144_ 0_ 0_ 145_;__ 5 _ 325 _ _ 331__ 0 I 5 665 0 10 670 26 1365 1391 08:OOAM :1 22 0 15 1 37 j 0 D8:15AM 26 0 23 ! 18 91 1 109 0 0 0 0 0' 2 132 0 3 134 5 280 285 1 49 a 08:30 AMI 16 0 14 2 30 , 0 27 30 101 4 113 11 128. 0 0 0 0 143 0 0 0 4 134 0 3 138 1 S 3.15 323 j 08 :45 AM 10 1 16 1 27 0 - 1.5 62 3 0 00 97 0 0 0 4 ! 1 124 0 2 125 15 298 313 Tcta17,4 1 fie 5 143 1 - ' 0 `._ --...--_.------_.... 90 387 19 a77 0 0 0 0 _ 0 4 89 0 3 93 . 7 211 224 0 11 479 0 11 490 - 35 1110 1145 Grand Total ! 191 2 122 11 315 0 AV prch % 60.6 0.6 38.7 223 777 29 1000 �'1 0 0 0 D 0 16 1.144 0 21 1160 61 2475 2536 0 Total Is 7.1 0,1 4.9 12.7 I', 0 22,3 9 77.7 31.4 D 0 Q 40.4. 0 0 0 0 ' 1.4 98.6 0.6 0 46.2 0 46.9 2.4 97.6 t 1.405 SB OFF RAMP- NE 44TH ST __..._._._ _- 1-405 S6 ON RAMP ­ NE 44TH ST From North From East From South From West _ Start Time Rlght Thru Lott APP' :. Total RI hi Right I Thru App Letr Right Thru Left Right Thril Lett . App -In- L - Total ITotal ' Hour AnaSYss From 07:0C AM to06:45AM -Peak1 o1 '.--.- _--'- --'-_._. .._. Total f _ _ TotalPeak ' _ Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07;00 AM 07:00 AM 1 14 0 11 25 0 18 104 122 0 D 0 0 0 133 0 ' 47:15 AM 33 0 11 44 07:30 AM 37 0 22 104 126 .: 0 0 0 0 1 187 0 133 1a8 ' 280 358 0 13 50 07:45 AM ; 33 1 19 53 0 O 47 46 101 146 �, 0 0 0 0 3 201 Q 204 402 Total Volume 117 - _.-._1_..._.�- ..---- -..._ i. - S4 iT2 - _..._....- O ------_..-------� 133 81 127 0 0 _��.__ -_ 390 5231 Q _Q---- 0 p.. 0. -.....-.."---�-_.-. 1 144 0 1_45 _ 32_5 _ _ .5 App. Total 68 0 6 31.4 . _-__ �........ - _.. -_..W `----' 0 25,4 _-_ - 74.6 0 0 0 5 0.7 665 0 0 1 PHF 791 250 .711 811 ' ._-- ,000 .707 _.-----., T938 .883.E 000 .000 --- .000 - -. _._._, 000 f -_.-_.. ,417 _99.3 - - 827--- .a00 ------- .821 - 849 Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 - Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: +❑mins. - 37 i 07:00 AM 1 07:15 AM -- 1 0 13 50 +15 mins.. 33 1 19 53 D i6 104 122. 0 0 0 0 1 187 0 186 +30 mins. 22 0 15 37 0 0 22 47 104 126 0 0 101 148. 4 0 0 0 0! 3 201 0 204. ._ .._ +45 mins- 26 _0 23 49 0 46 Bi 127 0 0 0 0 2. 2 144 0 132 0 145 _ Total Volume 118 1 70 189 !---�Q_254-qg6_.. ---523, 0-_. _p... -- 1 -. -. ... Q_._ - - O i _. 7 ...._ _ .. g64 O 134 _. _ - 871 A pp Total' 624 0.5 ___..,. 37.--��- - a'.. 0 0 D 1 99 0 PxF 797 .250 .76 992 . „-,---- _ .000 ,707 --'_ - - .. _._. .938 .883 000 000 - .. .... .O❑❑ -_. ,000 ' .583 _ _ 826 000 -.- ..822 RENTON, WASHINGTON 1-405 SB RAMPS NE 44TH ST LDC# 02P GRT09040M TRAFFICOUNT, INC. P.O. Box 2508 OLYMPIA, WA 98507 trafficount@msn.com (360)491-8116 File Name : GRT05502P Site Code : 00000002 Start Date ; 2/24/2009 Page No : 1 Groins Printed- Primary _ _ ' f-46 SB OFF RAMP NE 44TH ST . _., . 1.405 SB QN RAMP _ _._.... NE 44TH ST From North - From --- -- East From South '_ From West Start Time Right rnru ; Left - Truck suP. root --- ._04:40 Right l �� rnYu _ -----1 Tf c Lek Truck �60 T.' Mn -t,,,, --- Right Thm - Left `Truck - We r w [RightThru I Lett - - Truck �- - a rovi rw ,�..� I r+ba Tow I PM �,� 65 3 26 D 94 j 65 -x 1250 - 0 _ �. tl D D; 7 33 0 _ ..0 - 40 ' W 1 2S9 260 - 04:15 PM 1 67 0 30 0 97 i 0 74 52 2 126 0 0 0 Q 0 5 35 0 1 40 - 3 263 213604:30 Ph1 63 1 27 0 91 0 74 54 0 128 4 0 0 0 0 '' 7 32 0 0 39 0 258 258 - ! 04:45 PM 67 1 32 0 100 ' 077 53 1 130 0 0 0 0 0 i 7 32 1 0 40 1 270 271 Total 262 5 liS 0 3$2 a._ 290-._219._.._ 4_....509.,.....4-----C�...0_._.-a--- 0 �--26__..�2. .-�--._'1 __ _ 154..!, _. '-s 5 ...1050.._..1055 05,00 PM 59 1 39 0 99 D 62 52 2 114 ! 0 0 D' 0 0 1 5 45 0 0 50 : 2 263 265 05.15 PM ' 59 2 30 1 91 i - 05:30 PM CO 0 0 60 55 0 115 0 0 0 0 0 j 7 42 0 0 49 ! 1 255 256 34 1 94 �. 0 55 51 3 106 0 0 0 0 D i 5 28 0 0 33 ! 4 233 237 05_:4. PM : 72 0 43 0 115 0 46 55 0 101 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 3B 0 1 43 1. 259 260 _ . Total 2$0 3 146 2 399 0 223 213 5 436 ! 0 0 0 0 0 j 22 153 0 1 L75 8 1010 1018 Grand Total ; 512 8 261. 2 781 0 523 432 9 945 0 0 0 0 0 48 285 i 2 334 13 2060 2073 _ Appfeli % �, 65.6 1 33.4 i 0 54.3 45.7 0 p 0 ! 14.4 85,3 0.3 Total o; : 24,9 0.4 12.7 37.9 ' 4 24.9 21 45.9 0 0 0 0 2.3 13.8 0 16.2 0.6 99.4 1.405 SB OFF RAMP NE 44TH ST i 1-405 SB ON RAMP --NE 44TH ST .- From North _ From �--- East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Leff � Left A PP. Total Right g ' - Thru - T --....Total Left Apo. --, Right i Thru Left ' . Right Thi ft I Left .. __._..... App' - .__ . Int. Tota[ - - - - -- - __.__._ Total t Total - Peak Hour Analysts From 04- 00 PM to 05:45 --- --_ _ ., .-, _ _ --. _ Peak Hour for Entire intersection Begins at 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 67 0 30 97 0 74 52 126, 0 0 0 0 I 5 35 0 40 263 0430 PM 63 1 27 91 0 74 54 128 0 0 0 0 7 32 0 39 ' 258 04:45 PM 67 1 32 100 ' 0 77 53 130 I 0 0 a 0 i 7 32 1 40 270 05:00 PM _ _ _ --_',_ 59 1 _39 _ _ 99 , 0 62 52 11,4 0 0 0_ 0 5 45 0 50 2G3 Total Volumc 256T�-�- 3� 126 l 95 App ' 397 0 28T _ _ 211 498 _ D 0 - 0 0'�, 2R - i44 _ _ _ _ - 1 -- -�-- 169 --�- 1054 Total 66.1 0.8 3:311 D 42,4 0 0_ 0 14 2 652 0 6 PHF .955 .750 821 966.000-1- _57.6 T X9.6 -__977 -- .95 -�1 _ .000- .0a0 - .pOD .000 -- ! 857 _ _ 80p _ .250 - _ 845 97fi Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 05:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:00 PM :04:34 Ph1 +0 mins. 59 L 39 - 99 ! 0 65 60 125 ' 0 0 0 0 I 7 32 D 39 +15 min5. 59 2 30 ' 91 0 74 52 126 i 0 0 00 1 7 32 1 40 _ +30 mins. 60 0 34 94 0 74 54 128: 0 0 0 0 5 45 0 50 +45 mins._ _„- 72 6 - 43 _ 135 0 77 53 130 0 0 0 0 7 42 0 49 To[a! Volume :, 250 399 0 250 243 509 - 0 00 0 I 26 151 1 178 %App Total 62.7 _ 0.8 36.6 - Op 14.6 84.8 D.6 PHF 666 375 .849 807 .000 -.- 942 _-_-913 ----- � 979.^ .000 .000 _ 000 .000 ! _._--- .929 .839 .. .250 .890 TRAFFICOUNT, INC. P.O_ BOX 2508 I-4Ub �i!3 U�F RAMP Put In Total 256 i� 3F— . 1-2 l R:ght Thru Left Peak Hour Data N60 F - z Primary Left Thru Right ol 238 OU IrlTolal 1-405 se CN RAMP File Name GRT05502P Site Code 00000002 Start Date 2/2412009 Page No 2 G NE 44TH ST OLYMPIA, WA 98507 From trafficount@msn.com rr RENTON, WASHINGTON Right _West Th,u Left App. Int, Total Total (360)491-8116 1-405 SB RAMPS 0 I NE 44TH ST 35 0 40 263 o i LOC# 02P GRT09040M 32 0 39 2S8 0 1405 §b OFF RAMP 32 1 40 44TH -H St 1-4-0. -5., -S,- -8- -0- wRAMP From North 5 45 0 From East From South T Start Time Right i Thru Left 1 App. Right A' PP. Thru Left Right i Thru Left 1054 Total 14,2 85.2 0.6 Peakour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak I of I .000-'857— _Intal.;_ _-.800 .250 Peak Hour for Entlre Intersection Begins at 04A5 PM 04:.15 PM 67 0 30 97 0 74 52 126 0 a 0 04!30 PM 63 1 27 0 74 54 128 0 0 0 04:45 PM 67 1 32 100 0 77 53 130 0 0 0 05:00 PM 69 39 -EF" 99 0 6 52 124 0 0 0 Total Vo 256 21 i2 387 0 287 2U —49g----- ----- - —0— 0 96 App. Total 65.1 0.8 33.! 0 57.6 42,4 PHF .955 754 .821 .968 1 .000 .932 .000 Coe- .000 I-4Ub �i!3 U�F RAMP Put In Total 256 i� 3F— . 1-2 l R:ght Thru Left Peak Hour Data N60 F - z Primary Left Thru Right ol 238 OU IrlTolal 1-405 se CN RAMP File Name GRT05502P Site Code 00000002 Start Date 2/2412009 Page No 2 G NE 44TH ST From rr App Right _West Th,u Left App. Int, Total Total Total 0 I 5 35 0 40 263 o i 7 32 0 39 2S8 0 7 32 1 40 271T 0 1 5 45 0 50 263 01 24 144 1 leu 1054 1 14,2 85.2 0.6 .000-'857— _-.800 .250 .645 G z rr 7-a- TRAFFICOUNT, INC. P.O. BOX 2508 OLYMPIA, WA 98507 RENTON, WASHINGTON traificount@msn.com File Name : GRT05503,4 (360)491-8116 SEAHAWKS WAY (RIPLEY LANE) Site Code : 00000003 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD Stan Date :212412009 LOC# 03A GRT09040M Page No :1 Groups Prir[ted- Primary SEA14AWKS WAY ! NE 447H ST DRIVEWAY LAKE 1iVASHINGTON ___.' {RIPLEY LN} BLVD] - From North 2,222 From East From South From West ' -Start 'rime '. Aught Thru I Left ;Truck AppT i -- Right - Thrums-t,eft . Truck 2222,-..�.._._____ - .P- AP U,m Right Thru - Lett ! Truck app-T-a Right Thru ' Left Truck 1 �._-.-._ 07:00 AM 1 1 0 3 -0 4 07:15 AMI0 0 6 i W 6- 25 1 0 32 2 0 0 2 _Y._�.- 2 0 1.27 - 2 2 129 - 4 167- 171 . 1 5 11 45 1 1 57 1 0 0 0 I 1 182 4 3 187 5 250 255 07:30 AM 0 0 10 1 10 ; 12 74 0 0 86 ' 0 0 0 0 q ❑ 189 2 4 191 5 287 292 07:45 AM 2 1 5 1 8 3-,_--_------- -2222.---- 19 ------------__..__ 53 3_ 2_ 75 1 0 0 0 1 j 0 146 7 1 153 4 237_ Totall 3 f 23 3 27 48 197 5 3 _ 250- 4� -_0 ._ p-.._�,_�-�-4'�, 1 ------------_.. 644 15 _,_.._� 10 fi60��-��-18"941 _241 959- 08:G0 AM ; 1 0 12 1 13 22 20 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 q j 2 I.19 2 1 123 2 178 18u 08:15 AM 1 0 15 1 16 % 22 30 0 0 52 1 0 0 0 1 j 0 123 3 2 126 3 195 198 08;30 AM 1 0 5 0 6; 13 31 1 7 45 1 0 D 0 1 0 129 4 3 133 10 185 195 ` 08:45 AM -', 3 0 7 2 10 - ----._ ..._._._ 9 2222-........v_.._._�- 17 0 2 26 ; 0 0 0 0 ------___._.......---------.._---_..._...___..._.._---___'46i; 0 0 82 4 4_ 86 8 122 130 To[al 6 0 39 4 45 1 66 98 1 9 _ 165 ! 2 0 0 0 2 2 453 13 ...._...._-.22..._.._13 10 468 ; 23 680 --- 703 &and Total 9 1 62 7 72 114 295 6 12 41.5 ' 6 0 0 2 6 3 1[197 28 20 1128 41 1621 1662 Apprch b 12.5 1.4 86.1 27.5 71.1 1-4 100 0 0 0.3 97.3 2.5 - - Total ro 0.6 0.1. 3.8 4.4 7 18.2 0.4 25.6 0.4 0 0 0.4 { 0.2 67.7 1,7 69.6 2.5 97.5 {RIPLE_- - -- SEAHAINFCS WAY Y 1 LN) NE 44TH ST DRIVEWAY 1 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD ---- From North From Lust From South From West StartTime Flight .. Thru'_ Leff g i - APP ` Total ! Right--Thru Left ---__ _ .. -�-2222... App' Right Thru - _, Left ! App' Right Thru Lett -. App Int. Tatar ------- --- _.- Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AN to 06:45 AM • Peak 1 of 1 .. _.,.._.._total_...,..-._Tota1----------.-_..Total - :.......... ..-- Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM - 07:15 AM 0 0 5 5: 11 45 1 57 1 1 0 0 1 1 182 4 187 250 07:30 AM { 0 0 10 10 12 74 0 86 1 0 0 0 0 0 189 2 191 287 - 07:45 AM 2 1 5 8 19 53 3 76 : 1 0 0 1 0 146 7 153 237 09:00 AM 1 0 . - 1-.?...._........1.3 �_---22_--2222.._.20 -222'2 0 _._----- 42 , 178 Taal Volume 3 1 32 35 64 192 4 260 2 4 --- - 0 2 3 _ 952 j %Apo. Tarol 8'3 - '- % --- o..._ _ - .._-._.._.8� 2222. 7 246 73.8 1.5 l 1❑❑ 0 0 Q.5 97.2 2,3 PHF 375 250 6628 692 „... 727 .� .649 _ .333 .756 ; .500 .000 _ .000 .SOQ . .375 _.. -- `----- -- .641 .536 .856 .829 Peak Hour Anofysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: __ 2222._----' -2222 _- 2222.2222 ' 07:30 AM 2222 - ! 07.15 AM ___.__._.._..._ - _.., .. _ __ ,. 2222.-.. --- 1 0780 AM . 2222. _.. .__ 07.00 AM 2222.. +0 mins. - 0 0 10 10 11 45 1 57 2 0 0 2 0 127 2 129 - +15 trans. 2 1 5 '', I 8 12 74 0 86 1 0 0 1! 1 182 4 1.87 +30 mins. 1 0 12 1.3 ` 19 53 3 75 0 0 0 q 0 189 2 191 +45 mins. 1 0 15 .. _..- _., - 16 2222 22 2222 20 - 0 1 D l46 7 153 TotaF Volume 4 1 42 47 64 _ __ -- 192 __0 _ _ __ _42 _ __1 _ _ 4 260 4 0 _0 0 4 1 - - . 2222._ _ . 644 1S _ 660 A T PP oral 8.5 _.-2.189.4 _ _. -.. _-_- - -24.6 73.8 1.5 j 100 0 0 0.2 97.6 2.3 H RHP .560 .250 .7QQ 734 727 _- _ .649 _ 2222_-',_ 333 .756 ; .500 ❑cq 2222. .000 _ 500 _..._.__.. .250 __ _...__..._ .852 .536 2222 2222___ 864 RENTON, WASHINGTON SEAHAWKS WAY (RIPLEY LANE) LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD LOC# 03A GRT09040M TRAFFICOUNT, INC. P.Q. BOX 2508 OLYMPIA, WA 98507 trafficount@msn.com (360)491-8116 File Name : GRT05503A Site Code -00000003 Start Date '212412009 Page No .2 SEAk•IAWKS WAY (RIPLEY 5EAFwvvKS-VVAY7I7II`LEY LN) Out In Total i I LN) {2igMThru Left NE 44TH S7 DRIVEWAY LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD i Peak Hour Data From North From East From South r From West - StartTime _ - -- App Mght Thru ! Lett ' Tatai _ -- R1 ht 1 Thru Lett App Tata! Right Thru Left App Total Right Thru Left - Apo.!n[ Total _.. Peak Hour Analysis From 07.40 AM to Q8.4S AM -Peak 1 of 1 i —�- "� _-�'� -'�- j_ -_-- -- "' --��.W��------ "'_ (-'- Total l Peak Hour for Entire Intersection 8e9111s at 07:15 AM Left Thru Righk 07:15 AM D 6 5 5 :' 11 45 1 57 1 0 O 1 1 182 4 187: 250 07:30 AM 07:45 AM Q 0 1.0 10 ; 2 12 74 0 86 ! 0 0 4 0 : O 189 2 191 287 08:00 AM 1 5 8, 1 0 12 13 : 19 22 63 20 3 75 ', 1 0 0 1. 0 146 7 153 i 237 ...... ......_.� To[af Volume 3 1 32 36 _-_......._--------.... 64 192 D 4 42 ..__........ 260 > 6 ......_.....__._-,.._-._..-:_.--------._-... 2 0 6 0 D O 2 119 2 .._._.--------___ i23 17_8_ _ App. Tatal 8.3 2.8 88.5 24.6 73.8 1.5 100 0 6 2 i 3 636 15 654 'y ' 952 PHF -.--.—___-- _ .375 .250 .667 692 _.. — , .727 .649 .333 __�...v... 756 -- .SDO .000 .OQQ - .500 0.5 .375 97.2 _..� __.__.... .641 2.3 ...._ .536 `' _..._ .856 � 829 5EAFwvvKS-VVAY7I7II`LEY LN) Out In Total i I {2igMThru Left ' y i i Peak Hour Data r Nash �F--`-/ Pe2kHourBeginsa167:15AM d i �N. O• Left Thru Righk 2i Out In Tatal �R V WAY RENTON, WASHINGTON SEAHAVVKS WAY (RIPLEY LANE) LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD LOC# 03P GRT09040M TRAFFICOUNT, INC. P.O- BOX 2508 OLYMPIA, WA 98507 traificount@msn.com (360)491-8116 File Name : GRT05503P Site Cade : 00000003 Start Date : 212412009 Page No : 2 SEAHAWI4S WAY (RIPLEY I ��AHAWKS WAY (HIPLE? LN) out in Total -- --- . _ .....__ _ . _... 4;_ a,. -.x.31., '.. LN) NE 44TH ST Right- Thru Left DRIVEWAY j LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD From North i Peak Hour Data From East From South _ From West North Stan Time Right Thru J Left RlghF ' 7ttru : Left I Rtght Thru Left ; App-.---- Right j Thru ' Lett ApP—W_-..--- int. Total _. - -------"- Tata! : I Total ; I �... .4 _ Total Left T" Total . Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05;45 PM -Peak 1 of 1 'Right i t I __—J_-• l 7_ �Q' -0trt In Tota3 RV Peak Hpur for Entire intersection 8eglns at 04:00 PM - 04;00 PM 0 0 8 8 7 127 2 136 ; 3 0 0 3 1 0 33 0 33 180 04:15 PM 0 0 6 6 i 9 135 0 144 ! 1 0 1 2 0 33 1 34 , 186 04:30 PM - 3 0 5 8 13 126 1 140 2 0 02! 0 33 1 34 184 _---__-04_45 PM i 0 12 i3 10 131 0 141 i {! 0 0 0 0 26 2 28 j 182 Total Volume I A 0 3S 35 39 519 3 561 `• 6 0 1 7 i 0 125 4 129 732 _ % App. Total i 11"4 0 _ 88"6 7 92-5 0.5 65-7 D 14.3 0 96.9 9.1 i - PHF , .333 .000 .648 673: ..----'--_ 750 .961 _._—------- .375 .974 .500 ---------- .000 .260 -- - - -- _._ .583 .000 .947 500 ,949: .984 ��AHAWKS WAY (HIPLE? LN) out in Total 4;_ a,. -.x.31., '.. Right- Thru Left i Peak Hour Data cis, aim _ North 2 z Paak Hour Begini at 44:00 PM [ 1 rnf a �Q, ' ibi1s Primay� O] :-- w.^ I �... .4 _ Left T" 'Right i t I __—J_-• l 7_ �Q' -0trt In Tota3 RV Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee Guarantee No.: NCS-445540-WAl City of Renton I3n1?in}ti�r51C) ) D LS� li r fc Lr Zl Issued by First American Title Insurance Company 818 Stewart Street, Suite 800, Seattle, WA 98101 Title 4ffIcer: Lance A. Lewis Phone: (206)728-0400 FAX (206)448-6348 First American Title Insurance Company Form No. 14 Guarantee No.: NCS-445540-WA1 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Page No.: 1 Ric t •! First American Title Insurance Company Nacional Cornrnerdal Services 818 Stewart Street, Suite 800, Seattle, WA 98101 (206)728-0400 - (800)526-7544 FAX(206)448-6348 SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE LIABILITY $ 3,000.00 ORDER NO.: NCS-445540-WAl FEE $ 500.00 TAX $ 47.50 YOUR REF.: APN 322405-9049 First American Title Insurance Company a Corporation, herein called the Company Subject to the Liability Exclusions and Limitations set forth below and in Schedule A. GUARANTEES City of Renton - Public Works Department herein called the Assured, against loss not exceeding the liability amount stated above which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. L.IABILIIY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth above. This Guarantee is restricted to the use of the Assured for the purpose of providing title evidence as may be required when subdividing land pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 58.17, R.C.W., and the local regulations and ordinances adopted pursuant to said statute. It is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction affecting title to said property. Dated: June 17, 2010 at 7:30 A.M. First American Tule Insurance Company Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) SCHEDULE A The assurances referred to on the face page are: A. Title is vested in; Guarantee No.: NCS-445540-WAl Page No.: 2 Port Quendall Company (formerly known as Jag Development, Inc.), a Washington corporation B. That according to the Company's title plant records relative to the following described real property (including those records maintained and indexed by name), there are no other documents affecting title to said real property or any portion thereof, other than those shown below under Record Matters. The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this Guarantee: 1. Unpatented Mining Claims, reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof. 2. Water rights, claims or title to water. 3. Tax Deeds to the State of Washington. 4. Documents pertaining to mineral estates. DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND OF VACATED NORTHEAST 44TH STREET (SOUTHEAST 80TH STREET), IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 880 47'36" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, 797.2 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 4+65.6 AS DESCRIBED UNDER RECORDING NOS, 4210056 AND 7811221071; THENCE SOUTH 010 12'24" WEST 30.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID VACATED S.E, 80TH STREET, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 010 12' 24" WEST 256.50 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY AND SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 204 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE X -LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AS DESCRIBED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7811221071 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 590 02' 16" EAST 1,115.92 FEET, TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 880 47' 36" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SECONDARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 2-A AS CONVEYED UNDER RECORDING NO. 4664242; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO PAN -ADOBE INC., BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING N0, 4856255; THENCE NORTH 620 59'05" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD DESCRIBED UNDER RECORDING NO. 4210056; First American Ttle Insurance Company Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Guarantee No.: NCS-445540-WA1 Page No.: 3 THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 4210056 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 5, SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND OF VACATED 44TH STREET NORTHEAST (SOUTHEAST 80TH STREET), IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5; THENCE NORTH 01° 12' 24" EAST 30.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 880 47'36" WEST 563,68 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF A TRACT AS DESCRIBED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7811221071 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 300 21'54" EAST 35.21 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5; THENCE NORTH 880 47'36" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 342.24 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 44° 14' 51" EAST 1,115.92 FEET, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7811221071; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID ARC 201.65 FEET TO THE R -A LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7811221071; THENCE SOUTH 320 59'47" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE, 11.60 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LINE ON THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 180.00 FEET A DISTANCE OF 68.23 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LINE ON THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET A DISTANCE OF 58.06 FEET TO A POINTT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID VACATED S.E. 80TH STREET WHICH IS NORTH 880 47' 36" WEST OF THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 880 47'36" EAST 77.13 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. APN: 322405-9049-03 First American Title Insurance Company Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) RECORD MATTERS: General Taxes for the year 2010. Tax Account No.: 322405-9049-03 Amount Billed: $ 70,195.63 Amount Paid: $ 35,097.82 Amount Due: $ 35,097.81 Assessed Land Value: $ 6,310,000.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 1,000.00 Guarantee No.: NCS-445540-WA1 Page No.: 4 Relinquishment of access to Secondary State Highway No. 2-A and of light, view and air by deed to the State of Washington recorded February 15, 1956, under Recording No. 4664242. (Affects access to SR405, and not to Lake Washington Blvd.) 3. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: October 8, 1975 under Recording No. 7510080738 In Favor of: City of Renton For: Public utilities (including water and sewer) Affects: Portion of Parcel A as described herein 4. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: February 26, 1976 under Recording No. 7602260427 For: Utility and related purposes Affects: Portion of vacated North 44th Street (S.E. 80th Street) Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: November 22, 1978 under Recording No. 7811221071 For: Closed pipe drainage system Affects: Portion of Parcel B Notice of tap or connection charges which have been or will be levied against the land as disclosed by recorded instrument. Inquiries regarding the specific amount of the charges should be made to the City/County/Agency. City/County/Agency: King County Water District No. 107 Recorded: September 19, 1991 Recording No.: 9109191394 7. Relinquishment of access to Secondary State Highway No. 1 and of light, view and air, except reasonable ingress and egress to, from and between the RA -Line ramp as constructed at the Northerly margin of said vacated Southeast 80th Street and the X -Line right-of-way Southwesterly of a line drawn radially Southeasterly from HES L/A X 1001+25 on said X -Line survey, by deed to the State of Washington recorded January 15, 1964, under Recording No. 5687408 and amended under Recording No. 7811221071. (Covers portion of Parcel B Northerly of the Southerly margin of vacated S.E. 80th Street) A record of survey recorded February 9, 2000 under recording no. 20000209900005 said survey discloses the following matters: FirstAmenccan TtletnsuranceCompany Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Guarantee No.: NCS-445540-WAI Page No.: 5 a. 6 foot high cyclone fence encroaches up to the 12.3 feet Northerly of the property line and up to 8.3 feet Northwesterly of the property line; b. Signs encroach Northerly of the property line; c. Asphalt concrete curb encroaches Northerly and Northwesterly of the property line; d. Possible interest of parties in possession as evidenced by sanitary sewer (8" PVC) line running across the property and across the Southwesterly property line without benefit of easement; e. Possible interest of parties in possession not disclosed of record as evidenced by storm drainage line (24" CMP) across Northerly property line and extending outside of easement area, and encroachment of drainage ditch across the Northwesterly property line; f. Impairment of easement shown at Paragraph 5 by model home, hopper and concrete shown therein; 9. A document entitled "Non responsibility Note", executed by and between Port Quendall Company and Rental Service Corporation recorded January 12, 2004, as Instrument No. 20040112000561 of Official Records. 10. Matters that may be disclosed upon recordation of final subdivision. Flrst Amerlcan Title Insurance Company Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) INFORMATIONAL NOTES Guarantee No.; NCS-445540-WA1 Page Na.; 6 A. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it. First American Title Insurance Company Form No. 14 Guarantee No.: NCS-445540-WA1 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Page No.: 7 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE 1. Except to the extent that specific assurance are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liabiiity for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters against the title, whether or not shown by the public records. (b) (1) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property; or, (2) Proceedings by a pubiic agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not the matters excluded under (1) or (2) are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the public records. (c) (1) unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the Issuance thereof; (3) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excluded under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records. 2. Notwithstanding any specific assurances which are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to any property beyond the lines of the land expressly described in the description set forth in Schedule (A), (C) or in Part 2 of this Guarantee, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways to which such land abuts, or the right to maintain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps, or any structure or improvements; or any rights or easements therein, unless such property, rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in said description. (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, whether or not shown by the public records; (1) which are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the Assureds; (2) which result in no loss to the Assured; or (3) which do not result in the Invalidity or potential Invalidity of any judicial or non -judicial proceeding which Is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provided. (c) The identity of any parry shown or referred to in Schedule A. (d) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to in this Guarantee. GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. Definition of Terms. The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: (a) the "Assured": the party or parties named as the Assured In this Guarantee, or on a supplemental writing executed by the Company. (b) "land": the land described or referred to In Schedule (A) (C) or In Part 2, and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "land" does not Include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule (A) (C) or in Part 2, nor any right, tide, interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways, (c) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security Instrument. (d) "public records" : records established under state statutes at Date of Guarantee for the purpose of Imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. (e) "date": the effective date. 2. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Claimant. An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any claim of title or Interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or Interest, as stated herein, and which might rause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any Assured under this Guarantee unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice, 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which the Assured is a party, notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or proceeding. 4. Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions; Duty of Assured Claimant to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 3 above: (a) The Company shall have the right, at its sole option and cost, to Institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, Interpose a defense, as limited in (b), or to do any other act which in Its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee, whether or not it shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. (b) If the Company elects to exercise Its options as stated in Paragraph 4(a) the Company shall have the right to select counsel of Its choice (subject to the right of such Assured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Assured and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel, nor will the Company pay any fees, costs or expenses Incurred by an Assured In the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not covered by this Guarantee. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or Interposed a defense as permitted by the provisions of this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent )urlsdiction and expressly reserves the right, In its sole discretion, to appeal from an adverse judgment or order. (d) In all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, an Assured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of such Assured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, an Assured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or Interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured. If the Company Is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. S. Proof of Loss or Damage. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided to the Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company within ninety (94) days after the Assured shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. if the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligation to such Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition, the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, Inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested try any authorized representative of the Company, the Assured shall grant its permission, In writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the Loss or Damage. All information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company, pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, It Is necessary In the administration or the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested Information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim, Form No. 1282 (Rev. 12/15/95) First American Title Insurance Company 6. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims: Termination of Liability. In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have the following additlonal options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result In loss to the Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or, if this Guarantee is Issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder, the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon, together with any costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses Incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all liability of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebtedness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said Indebtedness, together with any collateral security, to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (a) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the Assured Claimant_ To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Assured claimant any claim Assured against under this Guarantee, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses Incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required In that paragraph, shall terminate, Including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4. 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The Liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least of: (a) the amount of liability stated in Schedule A or In Part 2; (b) the amount of the unpaid principal Indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, as limited or provided under Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations, at the time the loss or damage Assured against by this Guarantee occurs, together with interest thereon; or (c) the difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or interest subject to any defect, lien or encumbrance Assured against by this Guarantee. 8. Limitation of Liability. (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, Igen or encumbrance, or cures any other matter Assured against by this Guarantee In a reasonably diligent manner by any method, Including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. (b) In the event of any litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title, as stated herein. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any Assured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Assured in settling any claim or sult without the prior written consent of the Company. 9. Reduction of Liability or Termination of Liability. All payments under this Guarantee, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liability pro tanto. 10. Payment of Loss. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement of the payment unless the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within thirty (30) days thereafter. 11. subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured daimant, The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property In respect to the claim had this Guarantee not been issued. If requested by the Company, the Assured shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary In order to perfect this right of subrogation, The Assured shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle In the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured in any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the Company shall be subrogated to ail rights and remedies of the Assured after the Assured shall have recovered its principal, Interest, and costs of collection. 17. Arbitration. Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the Assured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Arbitrable matters may Include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relating to this Guarantee, any service of the Company In connection with its issuance or the breach of a Guarantee provislon or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Liability Is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured. All arbitrable matters when the amount of liability is in excess of $1,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees only If the laws of the state in which the land is located permits a court to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered In any court having jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 13. Liability Limited to This Guarantee; Guarantee Entire Contract. (a) This Guarantee together with all endorsements, if any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assured and the Company. In Interpreting any provision of this Guarantee, this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole, (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this Guarantee. (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 14. Notices, Where Sent. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall Include the number of this Guarantee and shall be addressed to the Company at 2 First American Way. Bldg, 2, Santa Ana, CA, 92707. Form No. 1262 (Rev. 12115195) First American Title Insurance Company s � 4 S wxn RECORDED RVrURN TOs POSTER PEPPER & SBEFELMAN PLLC 1.111 Third Avenue, Suite 3400 Seattle, Washington 98101 Attention: Bruce A. Coffey STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED (Pan Abode Site) 13 Orantor,�(ab'�IpA& + JOHN L. R9 IUM and JANET P. EIINBARD, husband and wife Grantees PONT QOENDALL COEPAM (forwrly known as JAO DxvELoIfm INC.). a Washington corporation Legal Descriptions Portion of Government Lot 1 in Section 93, Township 24 North, Range S East K.E. and portion of Governmmt Lot 5 in Section 79, Township 74 North, Range S East, W.E. (Complete description attached as)9whiblit 4)3<4 fay'et J9.1 •d Assessor's Tax Parcelt 322409-9049-09 TAR GRANTOR, JOHN L. EvsDARD and JANET P. HOEEARD, husband and wife, for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLY CONSIDBRATYON in hand paid, conveys and warrants to POET QVENDALL CONPANr (formerly known as JAG DSVSLOPKM, INC.) , a Washington corporation, the real estate situated in the County of Icing, State of Washington described in Exhibit ,a attached hereto, subject to the encumbrances set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto. Dated this Ar day of March, 1998. L t FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST 0077 L. HIMBARD TRANSNATION TIT[E INSURANCE CO, r JAM P. HUBBARD 32489*.: -1- R .# 's4- f1i� • _ .v -:!i ✓ r Kna` i .a% 'z �'-e1 r r,,fa} "'` r-�. . STATE OF XURINGTOR 1 gg- COUNTY OF I certify that i know or have satisfactory evidence that JOHN L. HUBBARD and JANET P. MMBARD are the persons who appeared before me, and said persons acknowledged that they signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this _ day of rC1A 1998, nsga.tur. ee �retarrl A O fL Lb17 frint or ft"1 Np of ■xaryl Notary public in and fora state of Washington, residing at My appointment expires R -19-9S_ 1 i EXRIBIT A TO STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED (Pan Abode Site) (Property Description The real estate in situated in King County, Washington, and is described as follows: PARCEL A: SITUATE IN THE CITY OF FMIT N, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINIG'TON. 329199.2 Page A-1 of 2 THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT IAT i IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. AND OF VACATED NORTHEAST 44TH STREET (SOUTHEAST BOTH STREET) AS VACATED UNDER,.RECORDING NO. 7602260427, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT IAT 1; THENCE NORTH 88047'36" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, 797.2 FEET, MORE OR LOSS, TO HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 4+65.6 f1 AS DESCRIBED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 4210056 AND 7811221071; O THENCE SOUTH 01012124" WEST 30.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID VACATED S.E. BOTH C+,N STREET, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 01012124" WEST 256.50 FEET; THWCE WESTERLY AND SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG^THE ARC OF SAID 9 CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 204 FEET', MORE OR LESS, TO THE X -LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AS DESCRIBED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7811221071 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 59002116" EAST 1,115.92 FEET, TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 68047136" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SECONDARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 2-A AS CONVEYED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 4664242; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO PAN -ABODE, INC., BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING 140. 4956255; THENCE NORTH 62059'05" WROT, ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LIM, TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LIME OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD AS DESCRIBED LINDER RECORDING NO. 4210056; THENCE NORTmxABTE7RLY, ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE AND THE S07nU -9TERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 4210056 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SITUATE IN THE CITY OF FMIT N, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINIG'TON. 329199.2 Page A-1 of 2 4 _- w i � h•�;L-tai PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF GOVERMENT LOT 5 IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST M.K. AND OF VACATED 44TH STREET NORTHEAST ISOUTHERST BOTH STREET) AS VACATED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7602260427, DESCRIBED AS FOLLONSs BEGINNIIM3 AT THR SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVMUrAENT LOT 5; THS'NCE NORTH 01.12' 24" BART 30.00 FM; THENCE NORTH 66047'36" MEAT 563.66 PERT TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF A TRACT AS DESCRIBED UNDER RBOORDINO N0. 78/1221071 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DASCRIBED, THENCE SOUTH 30021154• EAST 35.21 FEST TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5; THENCE NORTH 60.47'36" XM, ALM SAID SOUTH LINE, 342.24 PEST TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A CGRVB TOITHR RIGHT, TM CSIrMR OF MSICH BEARS SOUTH 44.14051" EAST 1,115.92 FEET, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NRSTBRLY LINK OF MID TRACT DESCRIBED UMM RECORDING NO. 7011221071; THENGF! NOoRTHBASTULY, ALONG SAID ARC, 201.65 FEET TO THE R -A LINE OF SAID TRACT DXSCRIBRD UNDER RBOORDING NO. 70112210711 THENCE SOUTH 32059147" EAST, ALONG $AID LINE, 11.60 FR2ZT; THENCE 80UTiaukSTE LY, ALONG SAID LINE ON THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET, A DISTA"M OF 66.23 FEET TO A POINT OF RXVXRU CM=o THENCE SOUTHEASTULY, ALONG SAID LIMB ON TRS ARC OF A CUM TO TUB RIOT HAVING A RADIUS OF 110.00 F=r, A DIST&MM OF 50. D6 FEET TO A POINT ON TM XMTNBRLY LING OF BALD VACAM B.B. 80TH STREET WHICH IS NOR'Plt 80047136" NEAT OF TAE TRUE POINT OF SEOIRNING s THEfCs SOUTH 08.47'36" 01181' 77.13 rM TO TLD+ TM of BEGINNINGI SITUATZ is THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF RING, M'TX Or WASHINGTON. 31""13 Pajo A-2 of 3 EXHIBIT-1 TO STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED [Pan Abode Sitel (Encumbrances) The real property described in Exhibit_ A is subject to the following encumbrances: 1. General Texas, as fcllms, to ptber with interest, penalty and ■tatutorY foreclosurs costs, if any, attar dellnqusttcy. fest half delinquent an May it 2nd half delinquent on November 1) - Tom Account No. Year Billed Paid Balance 322408-9049-03 1996 $22,426.49 $.on $22,426.09 The levy code for the property basin described is 2140 for 1996. UD Q 2. Conservation (COM Service Cha ogether with interest, a, t penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if delinquency, flat half dsliAquent an may 1s 2nd half delingg4entfanr 1) T count92 YYaz >iilled 4 Dalence 322405-9049-03 1999 $5.40 $.00 $5.00 Ole 3, NOTICR OF TAP OR CONN=IO)f CHARGES muCH IMys NBBB OR Nrm g6 GZY3BD AGAINST THE LAND AS DISCLOSED 9Y Rt0D8DED I1f8TRWMTI 13%mmu u D MO IFIC AWr OF TM CRJUt= SHOULD DE MADE TO 188 cs , CITY/CDUN' /AM29CY, Eizeg County Water District Nb, 107 RECORDED: 8eytamber 19, 1991 RECORDING NO.: 9A09191394 4. RA38MElFP AND TRS TERNS AND 0011DITION9 TEMMF, GRAMM-. city of 14mton PURPOSEi Public utilities (including aster and sewer) AREA APPECI'Jib: Portion of Parcel A as deaclIW therein RECORDING NO,: 75100$0736 S. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AM CONDITIONS TRZRXOF: DISCLa9FD BY: Instrumant raeaxdmd wader Rsos 4bq No. 74D2240427 KMPOSL: Utility and related purposes AREA AFPSCCED: Portion of vacated lbrth 44th Ptxeat (a.m. am Street) Page H-1 of 2 EASTO'QNT AND :'M TERKS ARD CDFDITIONS TRHRHOF: DISCLOSED BY: instrument recorded under Recording No - 7811221011 PURPOSE; Closed pippe drainage system ARA AFFECTED; Portion of Parcel S Relinquishment of access to Secondary State Highway No. 2-A and of light. view and air by deed to the State of Washington recorded Fehneary 15, 1956, under Recording 130, 4666162. (Affects access to SR40S, and not to Lake Washiagtan Blvd.) Relinquishment of access to aecondary State Highway No. 1 and of light, view and air, R=opt reasonable ingress and egress to, from acrd between the RA -Line rare U constructed at the Northerly wLcgin of said vacated Southeast 80th Street and the I -Line right-of-way Southwesterly of a line drawn radially Southeasterly from RN L/A x 1001+25 on said I -Line survey, by dead to the state of 11ashington recorded January 13, 1964, under Recording No. 5607400 and amended under Recording No. 7011721011. (Covera portion of Parcel 5 Northerly of the Southerly margin of vacated $.H. 00th Street) MATTERS XUATM TO EMMED ==IS S 001M G8 AS DISCLOM BY AUTO SURVEY !(ADE BY B493, ROSL i HITClIXNW, INC., DATA AV(FtrST 1, 1996, LAST REVISSD AUGUST 15, 1996, JOB NO. 96165.00, AS FOLLOWS: a} 6foot high cyclone fence encroaches up to 12.3 feet Northerly of the property line and up to e.3 fast Northwesterly of the property line b) Signs encroach Northerly of the property linea c) Asphalt concrete curb ancroacbes Northerly and Narthvestarly of the property liner d) Possible interest of parties in possession as svidsaced by sanitary sewer (0' PVC) line rvnni,g acmes the p sty and across the southwesterly property liue wi%'U besefit of easementr e) Possible interest of parties in possession not disclosed of record as evidenced by storm drainage line (241 CHP) aervu Northerly property line and extending outside of easement area. and encroachment of drainage ditch across the Nortbwasterly property line; f) Impairment of easement shorn at Paragraph 5 by model home, hopper and concrete shown thereinr Page 8-2 of 2 S ' Y 6. 7. n n i0 fV C") 9. EASTO'QNT AND :'M TERKS ARD CDFDITIONS TRHRHOF: DISCLOSED BY: instrument recorded under Recording No - 7811221011 PURPOSE; Closed pippe drainage system ARA AFFECTED; Portion of Parcel S Relinquishment of access to Secondary State Highway No. 2-A and of light. view and air by deed to the State of Washington recorded Fehneary 15, 1956, under Recording 130, 4666162. (Affects access to SR40S, and not to Lake Washiagtan Blvd.) Relinquishment of access to aecondary State Highway No. 1 and of light, view and air, R=opt reasonable ingress and egress to, from acrd between the RA -Line rare U constructed at the Northerly wLcgin of said vacated Southeast 80th Street and the I -Line right-of-way Southwesterly of a line drawn radially Southeasterly from RN L/A x 1001+25 on said I -Line survey, by dead to the state of 11ashington recorded January 13, 1964, under Recording No. 5607400 and amended under Recording No. 7011721011. (Covera portion of Parcel 5 Northerly of the Southerly margin of vacated $.H. 00th Street) MATTERS XUATM TO EMMED ==IS S 001M G8 AS DISCLOM BY AUTO SURVEY !(ADE BY B493, ROSL i HITClIXNW, INC., DATA AV(FtrST 1, 1996, LAST REVISSD AUGUST 15, 1996, JOB NO. 96165.00, AS FOLLOWS: a} 6foot high cyclone fence encroaches up to 12.3 feet Northerly of the property line and up to e.3 fast Northwesterly of the property line b) Signs encroach Northerly of the property linea c) Asphalt concrete curb ancroacbes Northerly and Narthvestarly of the property liner d) Possible interest of parties in possession as svidsaced by sanitary sewer (0' PVC) line rvnni,g acmes the p sty and across the southwesterly property liue wi%'U besefit of easementr e) Possible interest of parties in possession not disclosed of record as evidenced by storm drainage line (241 CHP) aervu Northerly property line and extending outside of easement area. and encroachment of drainage ditch across the Nortbwasterly property line; f) Impairment of easement shorn at Paragraph 5 by model home, hopper and concrete shown thereinr Page 8-2 of 2 S ' Y EASTO'QNT AND :'M TERKS ARD CDFDITIONS TRHRHOF: DISCLOSED BY: instrument recorded under Recording No - 7811221011 PURPOSE; Closed pippe drainage system ARA AFFECTED; Portion of Parcel S Relinquishment of access to Secondary State Highway No. 2-A and of light. view and air by deed to the State of Washington recorded Fehneary 15, 1956, under Recording 130, 4666162. (Affects access to SR40S, and not to Lake Washiagtan Blvd.) Relinquishment of access to aecondary State Highway No. 1 and of light, view and air, R=opt reasonable ingress and egress to, from acrd between the RA -Line rare U constructed at the Northerly wLcgin of said vacated Southeast 80th Street and the I -Line right-of-way Southwesterly of a line drawn radially Southeasterly from RN L/A x 1001+25 on said I -Line survey, by dead to the state of 11ashington recorded January 13, 1964, under Recording No. 5607400 and amended under Recording No. 7011721011. (Covera portion of Parcel 5 Northerly of the Southerly margin of vacated $.H. 00th Street) MATTERS XUATM TO EMMED ==IS S 001M G8 AS DISCLOM BY AUTO SURVEY !(ADE BY B493, ROSL i HITClIXNW, INC., DATA AV(FtrST 1, 1996, LAST REVISSD AUGUST 15, 1996, JOB NO. 96165.00, AS FOLLOWS: a} 6foot high cyclone fence encroaches up to 12.3 feet Northerly of the property line and up to e.3 fast Northwesterly of the property line b) Signs encroach Northerly of the property linea c) Asphalt concrete curb ancroacbes Northerly and Narthvestarly of the property liner d) Possible interest of parties in possession as svidsaced by sanitary sewer (0' PVC) line rvnni,g acmes the p sty and across the southwesterly property liue wi%'U besefit of easementr e) Possible interest of parties in possession not disclosed of record as evidenced by storm drainage line (241 CHP) aervu Northerly property line and extending outside of easement area. and encroachment of drainage ditch across the Nortbwasterly property line; f) Impairment of easement shorn at Paragraph 5 by model home, hopper and concrete shown thereinr Page 8-2 of 2 S S 1 r"5 TZ �5y� 6p� iio S 8 '�� •gyp. ,,�r3. �ff �x�:'.. _ :� � [w!1 2:7LLI N gy��• ,N �'q'S, ALJ Z as aY f f'Ci�; N 1i Vo'CSG "',, Mava?..tos :: •,rB'7+0 {iif• 76.z05--. - � � : z iw, aaadvll "tnwHl 0 0- I NQ3�)NIHSV43HVl ' ... E Q Q LO 3NII doadvk dLro 3fd, 2toBWH tl3tflo — — — Y -- _..�.-- -- ---------------- — — -- -- — — J >: O O C4 6 �:4. I'1 odoS Ewa oFo _ �scc'a jYr� .ro J T 99 p <�Kr < ,o 3 rcIX �•jGw�Ti 1n .:� si �� Z � LO Lj r I 501'17'42"E _td- (rORNEAeY srATL 5[COd0.41fk M'GHWAY :, da IA) - 9017 s:., TZ �5y� 6p� iio S 8 '�� •gyp. ,,�r3. �ff �x�:'.. _ :� � [w!1 2:7LLI N gy��• ,N �'q'S, ALJ Z as aY f f'Ci�; N 1i Vo'CSG "',, Mava?..tos :: •,rB'7+0 {iif• 76.z05--. - � � : z iw, aaadvll "tnwHl 0 0- I NQ3�)NIHSV43HVl ' ... E Q Q LO 3NII doadvk dLro 3fd, 2toBWH tl3tflo — — — Y -- _..�.-- -- ---------------- — — -- -- — — J >: O O C4 6 �:4. I'1 odoS Ewa oFo _ �scc'a jYr� .ro J T Z1. z 14C— Not A 09 Qgg 23 ww", 7;0 c -n n-'51 A -A q 'Lbs Z .99 calm 2 Inv sly 3, 0 14 MO vo JA A 0 `k m CslQ xn AmF#C>4 RSvn]t0>�'y�z R S�lA m aaZ6i`�mpA Vi�= fizY *��Ju' Qz •z�n Q_o iviza44 n2, 'o z ':. ,z i ���*� " �m���y ��Q�" <�4��'$,�� n ���� z��i9�i�Q����� 1°.l��f$ �F •m.. 29 `�rn�� ��'•.. Nmg vu'g x^ ❑;o c...{nom z 7r, ��� "'tiA� A�A �� i'�'• i $� i��a. o v r PA o r ,� ao n gip,po,JUA�Q ���N� � � �� '��R <se'..,`.• °��'� ? # a i��y. 4p�� ';gin Bio S �. o - v � ..,. �Nnm ° z ,., � nit '•,� 5 . y.. H T4 ry xm"o�IV 2;R3n'° i> mm mem � ��myxxzvm � QQ" a y`N' �y� 4 c gf%i z m i�. ❑4 m...p N Nmm Qm:m m4 hi fiFF'i PAP r^n IE m ,^ ~Ki�iK}n z s! L` o'ngn' y� rrn a� �zp n •.i -�i.7 �zsn�n ny(�Qi c� N i} _ kk vp ` ��S dY~i�nxK � y 434 1n 2.E$ ':. ^ `f': o 'j x�m ` �v �$ s,-� "iismc, h'nnm m z.�u . N,`41- ;`S.. Ai �A ■mmp�m�x_� t� HIMr $$$ 4 ' -'... ' r�s moo �m���}off no w € p ZjV gm c xgig c- � 'a .A� N D O O U1 m O � U O J Va C J Q"- W LL1 U U D` d d mTcu-u�,E E ITL ° (D rt o v � a c L m n R N � � c zT�y° r v SocN� r�o_m E CL a C� N ID F= f } Q . 02 /ch) 4 J CL O O Z Q t LLJ L 0 p p \\\` p i '0 Cr)KD W - u O. Q til _ N cd CO (D Z Cl) a ��� 9 �_ss.ss.00v� 'E'Sf 4) 1. O �n i 8 qr t Or LJ W Z k O `^ w „ l _ :.0 u W c a�& io� PT .as'lccl � 7,cp,s�op �mdaa�� F. � y.r ry6- 501.7 S'4Y�4', a, < ec I i.ul 501'1'1 �2 E [rorsHMY secrnloAAr. t, �n { w qr �:d ry LJ W Z w „ W _ :.0 u W d- U- O Z rc� WO w .N % a 3AY I J fc' 32 32 k"'' LO r - F- °::'kS Tns �� i�o is p 5 C) O tt a CD 1; � � LJi.• ,� LO � y.r ry6- 501.7 S'4Y�4', a, < ec I i.ul 501'1'1 �2 E [rorsHMY secrnloAAr. t, St�TE HWHNAY HO 2A) { w qr �:d ry LJ W Z w „ W _ :.0 u W d- U- O ti LJ W Z Li 0 "WAC 9a los % a 3AY I J fc' k"'' LO r - F- I E D is p 5 C) O a CD Q1 :j- n 52 •'----------- -- - JA A o UA 9 0 1 4z It. 0. AyfNL,�oa gs g; lit z r NCqO'51'33'E i7 z 2660 gG, Q1 :j- zm N wZ N o-o�11 "� z v A' n cg�z� �' �•� �ulzs stn m �{.����s � mm3�'Rn��� �xt�'-s• =A � �,��+� ����"Ro"�ag�� m�=� %� m ��" na�� m� Ozi4mS" o %�{<4b Atvg V�-Sit V'AS?A n '':.� s�3$,'0 {z•.� i="I,� F� ; "'p�p. a p ,�s "'a A 3 Fg i �J � �� ,g R^s+A fib- ��• N ��'.. �+"�ux��iO '�g+� o'n° Y':'^{n �C" � C AN N F .'. .. .•1'a [nia z79,10 F'Nx Nei=� T�� i All •'z4°4N Z3a. ..'; ^ HO '�hyz pm' ° z 4m w mw' a p A.,�+[nt ��n�[�2i A %pyRH,T6HmT [=�=.�xx Nyi�+ (pn 3tnmQ�ixAAg"' �acQ, AS I.1 DY%�� f1fi mM✓�m � i4���r� m��'p���• L^`:+ .:'���_� Ek �VpI ppzipip ° 2 ppi aOzO ppz r��Izpp'kL r i 8'Ov..,.A 0gtqnn[ptpnn$�� �u',Y iNA �� ..,o i� '° `'_,� �';m �F�m"' obi Ng zr'g M rJ �i g iz53 :., fy•. n �-�� ius,� � Q � � ��^'�...� •A N�M� �-` z��'{p ylir�n�m N�iz� vq si wa"§72 U 4 W �Ac3i ..'.:.- .. � ,. i. .. 3 Spp �o � Z * � 'n �C� * � iN�V•1 om � ��O Po r•1 �n VVVIII yp CGa Q;• oo n rs•I A ■■ �R`ZZ OO Opb m'. �� � tui ttpp .� 1'Im •:.4 �:.:H ,'.'Z � I� +1 l� �� i y .• ''a. t aa x .. pp NN m OR r °o ro m'. Y ro 0 2Vl T C LAllt DEED IN SHE ;lATT21 Of 81 405 (ria No. 1), Renton to Eanaydale (Eacess Eight of Way). =W AU dial S1 TEESI pitSOfTS. ghat the STATE Of VAlgilh M, for and in cofsideration of 1110 TB06SA16, SEVEN IOIM®, FIM AID PD/100 02.750.06) D01] AIS hereby convoys nal quitclaims unto PA* -ABM . 11COE70RATID, a Vashingtom totporstiom, 411_its rtg%t, t[tle =0 interest, in and to the folloving deaotibsd rel property sltartad if Sung Coenty, State of Voehingtoft 1Lmse portions of tbweremegt Lot 1, Section 32, Tawaship 24 North, "a S Bast, Y.K., and of Govermmt lot 5, Section 29. said Township and Range, described as fallaurs lgiamiag at a point an the aorto line of raid Coveram"t lot L W"tb 83647136" Vat 197.2 feat, sora or lose. from the northeast torur tbsreoi. said point beim at highway Emgtsaat'■ Stotioa (hereinafter referred to as US) 4+63.6 on the Tempotary Cosfsetlom surfer of State llghrq loet■ lo. 405 (SON No. 2-A), Resaydalm lorth. the specific details coaceratmg all of wbieb ray be found as Sheat 1 of the plea thereof ter of record and on file IS tie office of the $" rotary of Trusportstioa at olyaipiS. YmsYingtos. buriat date of approval February 7, 19501 thence South 01612124" Vee: 30 feat to the soatbarly margin of vacated Southeast 90th Street a¢ the point Of curve of a esrvo to the left, this radial c"ter of which bears South 01'12'24" Vast 256.5 Eesti them* westerly and southwesterly, parallel with satd Temporary Cousection survey. to isteFeect tlw I -Line right of vey lin" of State lighrny laata 110- 405. b mtoa to Eaanydalsl them" northeasterly. almag said I -Live riot of emy line. being a curve to the tight having a radial Of 1115.92 feat to intersect tie Lk -Liao right of wY 11t0 of amid Ilgbray at a point 50 feet southeasterly. %bow measured radially, frem said i-lins nerve= ad at a point 437.58 fast northeasterly. vbeq measured along said It -Line right of ray iia■. frtn a point opposite MM Y 995+05.94 maw South 39902116" Seat )D fast therefrom, tberca South 32'59'17" Fist, alemg said &A -Rims right of my lima, 11.60 fast to the point of carve of a carve to the left having a radtmm of Igo feat; theace continoiag am said U -Lina right of Vey Hao, along said carve, as arc dintmeo of 6.8.23 foot to the point of carve of a curve to the right having a radius of 120 fend t`asucs toatinsing oa maid RA -Lima right of way Use, ■Rang said curve, as arc distance of 62.50 foot to the mortherly margin of amid vacated Southeast 501h Street; themes Seoth U'47'36" Rant 74.46 feat aloft said northerly margin. being also a right of way line of said highway; tbsmee Soetht 3002l'54" Fast, aloft a right of ray tins of said ltgbray, to the north 11" of Sold Qmormeat Lot 1; themes North 83'047436" Vast, alotp said north life. to the point of hegisateg; together vtth any additioul portion at amid vscatsd Southeast 80th Street tont attach" to the above described property icy operatton of law. T.C. #7-"23tt I% tXGa TAY t.,pT !tEODU%D page 1 of 3 Pages a Description: ranq'WA Document -Year. Month. Day. DoolD 1978.1122.1071 Page. 1 of --- -- •-._._. Order: I Comment: tesorving unto the state of Vesrin{taa, its saeeessors or assitns, an easement for the operation, saistenasce, reconstractioa end isspaction of ■ ciao" pips lrsinais system to be installed by the grantee herels over, loader, across end upon that poittom of the above described property lying within a strip of land 20 fest is width, bola= M fest in width on each sada of the followling described center 11441 aq gneiss at a point opposite iii! I 1002+42.3 on sold I -Line Garvey of said KSLes7 and 104.5 feet enutheuterly tbsoe tefrom; thea Saoth 86848'510 Vest, tbrough a pout od said I -Line right of wt' line opposite lab Z 1000+23.8 om 8411 I -lira moray and 36.5 feet southe"terly therefrom, 230 test to the ead of tble center line description, it bolt$ msderstood and agreed that no permanent structure rill be located on the sbovs described easement primers. The grantee herein, its mmosor■ er ssslgne. shall have no right of Ingress. and egress to. frac and betwseo said St 605 mad the lands herein cosysyedl war shall the grantee herelm, its saccessare ur asslans, be "titled to compensation for my loss of light. riw and sir occasioned by the location. eoaet"etion, maintenance or operation of said highway= IICLFT that said Wmtce. its eueceseors or &&signs, shall have ressoneble ingress sed egress to. from and betwes the RA -Ung req as constructed at the northerly sorgio of said ranted Soatheut 90th Street and the I - Line right of ray soutbmaterly of s line draws radially southeasterly from HIS LjA 11001+23 on said I-L10e survey. The specific details eouesrnlni all of %&lch may be found oa sheet 6 of that certain plan entitled 8l; 605 (FSE Bo. 1), baton to iennydale. sae of record and an file to the office of the Secretary of Trouportation at 01yepie, liashiogtom. hearing date of approval Jane 4. 1963. The lends berela described are not required for State kithray part' , sod are conveyed patesmst to the prorisfons of Chapter 79. Law of 1977, First Ixtreordia.ty 5.89106. Doted at olygis, Washington, this —LL---dax of It�. STATE Of VAS'S INCTQZ V. A. 9DLLRY, Seerat y of Transportation I.C. 0-A42311 Fate 2 as 7 Fast* 9 _ it - "I- -_ Description: King," Document -Year. Month. Day. DoclD 1978.1122.1071 Page: 2 of ord*r: 1 Comment: APMM AS TO TORN: I Lstant Attorney GtVia REVICVLD As TO ?=I o Ry, FV 1r6 s. Iscorporsted SUTa (w w►sanw-rou l as County of !bon too ) Oo chis_ !�► - —day of IA&V44-4fAw- , 19g, before 9e paranaally sppear9d V. A. s%Uy, taom to sa as the Secretary of Traeapprtattoa, 4aebin{too State Depa[tOW of Traosportatioa, and e:eoeted the [0:690128 iastruaent. act0Orl6d9La9 astd La6trummt to bs the free sad eolvntary act Bad dead of the State of Yaabin9tos, for the 0809 and parpo9a9 th8raia 4entionad. aso on Oath stated tbat he is autharlsed to erecote said iastrusent. CieeO ender ay hand sad affLaiai seal the day and year last obaws mitten. I.C. ;7.4"02711 loge 3 of 3 749ps Description: Xing,WA Doc=ent -Year, Month, Day.DoclD 1978.1122.1071 Page; 3 of Order: 1 Comment: ■ is t ��}IUisf �.e VotarPublic art StOto of wastinstOs, r Ldift rt 9lyapia. �d t��' aa. rid I.C. ;7.4"02711 loge 3 of 3 749ps Description: Xing,WA Doc=ent -Year, Month, Day.DoclD 1978.1122.1071 Page; 3 of Order: 1 Comment: ■ is t Ca I w fV r-1 ' r-1 V a 0 - L � N z G LP for Rbwd-m-*uest of ° °4 STATE OF wAsMNcTorr q4 ; DcPw ,,rW A Traa: a:rt - on Land �S_na r•Y.t LGr.,:a1 1 .5 n 0 FL,hw3v Ai n•ti:1 sricc BLld;rq + IT t Description: ICing,WA Document-Year.Mona.Day.DoclD 1978.I122.1071 Pago. d of Order: 1 Comment: - " - - 3 gR1.1 SLAin 9tto Ill Tttl NATm Of $L 405 (ISl No. 1), lenton to Rennydale (iiaeea right of Vay}. 111W ANL KIM OT TRL519 11E26", that the STATE Of VASRIf<CFOI. for and in consideration of IVO TROtSAND, SS4fa 11MLMD, rlrry AND 201100 (51.750.00) DOLLS hereby coneys and gsittlital Onto PAR -ASMI. DICO K"TED, a Vashiaston corporation, all_its right, title an<' interest. Is and to the folloving descrlbad real property sitvetod in ling County, State of Vashingtoar ra", portto" of Goveruseat Lot 1, Seetton 32. Towssbip 24 North, Rause S Last, Y.K., sad of Coferment Lot 5, Seetton 29. said Toveahip and lame. described as Fallow: le;lanioa at a point on the north Has of said Coveronaat tat 1 worth 66147136" Yat 797.2 fest, *ora or lass, from the nortbsa41t 4:9mor thereof. said point bain5 at Rigbosy I'ngiaper's Station (bereisaftat referred to an US) 4+65.6 on the Te■porary Conoattim survey of State lfgbvay Rusts No. 405 (SSA No. 2-A). genaydals North, the specific details toweraing all of uhiei "y be fsaed ca ghost t of the plan thereof nos of record and 2,6 file to the office of OW Seeratary of Trsaapo"a tion at Olympic. We"Watos. bsaring date of approval febmary 7, 1950; thence Sostb 01117'24' Yes: 30 filet to the motherly a9rsts of vacated Soutbsa■t Nth Street 92 On point of caws of a curve to the left, the radial center of ,Mich brats Soath 01 12'26" Vest 256.5 fest; [bones vestsrly and southeasterly. parallel with sold Tmporary Ceseaettos mrvay, to intafsect t1A I -Line right of +ray 1109 of state R1gh,sy Rom No. 405, baton to lssaydalal theme northeasterly. along said I -Line right of my line, being a carve to to right baring a radtvs of 1115.!2. feet to tstetsect tle M -Live right of way line of said Ltahvay at a pofst 50 fest soatbesstar)y, &as reassured radially. frac said I -Line survey and at a point 417.54 feet nortboestsrly. wlgv vsasorad slog; said I-Lins right of soy Ilse, few a point opposite 102E 1996+85.44 and Swath 59'02'16• gnat 30 fest therefrom, tbame Soath 32'54147" Last, sleeg said RA -Line rtg%t of tiny Lino, 11.60 foot to the point of cairn of a eerre to the left hiving a radia. of 130 rest; theocs Cootimill on acid u -Lina t:lgbt of soy Ila@, along said carve, as are distance of 63.21 feet to the potst of carve of a carve to chs right hsvisg a radial of 120 festf thsnca continuing on said U -Wee ri;bt of way line, ale" said curve, an are distance of F2.90 foot to the northerly Margin of said vacated SMtba"t 30th ltrpti tbeace Soot% 63'47'76" Last 70.46 feet along said nortbatIl Margta. being also it tight of say line of said Righvay; thence Soatb 30'21'54" loot, 910% a r151t of way live of gild WxW4y, to the north 112,41 of said Owern t Let IS tbsace North 66'47'36' Yost. aloft said Mort% line, to the point of bsgimiagi together with say additions) portion at said vacated 600tbesst With street that attache to the sbovs described property by operation of law. T.C. 17-A-02111 Lale 1 of 3 pages Cf q ■ Description: King,NA Document -Year. Month. Day. Doc= 1978.1122.1071 Paye: 1 of Order: 1 Comment: Reserving unto the State of Vao ington, its wacceseors or 42e162e. as aasement for the operation, uiatswance, reaocettectios and twapectioa of a ctosed pipe drainage system to be imtelled by the grantee berets over, ander, serosa cad upon that Portion of the above described property filag Within a strip of ISM 14 fart in width, being 10 feet is vldth w each 0169 of the following described center 1Lao: Eagisming at a point opposite US 1 1042+41,3 w said I -Lin survey of said KSbral and 104.4 het southsa terly therefromi thence Soots: 66'46'31 Vast, tbraugh a point on said 1-410e richt of +say line opposite M 1190092].0 on said X-Lims survey and 46.5 feet Swcheasterly tharefrvm, 250 fest to the gad of this center line description, it befog smderstood and agreed that so permanent structure will be located on the above described essemst premises. The groat** hernia, its successors or assigns, shall have no rigit of ingress, and egress to, from and between cold SR 405 sad the lands bersin com eyedi nor shall the grantee Uretm, its successors at asigma. ha entitled to coapensatios far my loss of ligit, viev sad air occasioned by the locatton, com9truCtion, mainteance or o►erntioa of said highsaYi EXCEPT that said grestse, its suce9seore or assigns, shall have ressomet?le ingress and ogres■ to, from and between the M -Line rasp as cosstrvcted at tba northerly margin of said vacated Southeast 60th Street cad the I - Line right of way southwesterly or a line drew* radially southeasterly from M LJA 1 1001925 as said X -Line survey. The specific details coneeamtsg all of which may be found an sheat 6 of that certain Plop Adtitlsd $1 405 Cr3l No. 1), Lenton to CannYdals, mos of record and an file is the afftca at the Secretary of Tra"Portatiw at Olympia. Washington. beetiag data of aPpraral Jum 4, 1963. The leads beWn described are mot re"Irad for State highway Parr + and are cooveyed parssast to the proeistoms of Chapter 78. Laws of 1977, First Xatrsardis:ey Session. Dated at 01MIA, Vashingtoo. this day of v4"Aw 19 2L. S T A T 9 0 Y A 5 1 1 0 T 0 V. A. IMM. Secretly of em0portattw T.C, 17-A-92311 rase t as 3 Pegea Description: Xing,T►A Doc=ent-Year.Month.Day.D0a1Dr 1978,1122.1071 Page: 2 of Order: I Gent: . 1i . s ' SU73 ur VaSan=Og ) County of Thurston ) Oa this __[k Any of , 14_LF, before as perm -111 appeared V. A. SCUZT, Fa"m to se an tin Secretary of Transportation, Yasbtegtaa State Departseat of TZMaIjortatton, and o:eeeted 00 torIWI% inatruaeat, acimowlwdSHft -td iastrmont to be the tree std volactaty act and awed of the State of wam"ton, for the roses and Par a" tbsreia wrctiomW. sed on oath stated that be is autbotim d to ecseeta said iaatruse■t. Given under my band and offtctal seal the day and pear 1"t sbova written. of VaabinSton, relidtae I.C. #7-k-03111 rose 3 of 3 TaSas Doscripti-on: King,WA Doc=ent -Year. Month. Day.DoolD 2978.1122,1071 Page; 3 of Order: I Caamtent: APPETLD AS TO FM, ky: j -- -V W -6 "pi A"tatest Attorney General- 11XVINED AS 70 /Daft N p _ >> t N e, bcorporated 00 r SU73 ur VaSan=Og ) County of Thurston ) Oa this __[k Any of , 14_LF, before as perm -111 appeared V. A. SCUZT, Fa"m to se an tin Secretary of Transportation, Yasbtegtaa State Departseat of TZMaIjortatton, and o:eeeted 00 torIWI% inatruaeat, acimowlwdSHft -td iastrmont to be the tree std volactaty act and awed of the State of wam"ton, for the roses and Par a" tbsreia wrctiomW. sed on oath stated that be is autbotim d to ecseeta said iaatruse■t. Given under my band and offtctal seal the day and pear 1"t sbova written. of VaabinSton, relidtae I.C. #7-k-03111 rose 3 of 3 TaSas Doscripti-on: King,WA Doc=ent -Year. Month. Day.DoolD 2978.1122,1071 Page; 3 of Order: I Caamtent: u.�7� ,.f. Q , NA r-1 ' ri m e• o P S for Rbr�^Request of ° �ATi OF W�,SMNGTO�IDepwtn rm r.,! d T+aic;r stvan S g ^,hw'JT k i n u-1 srico H�1dmq Gyfnpp, WTjhing.0j 96$N Description: King,WA Document—Year. Month. Day.Doo3D 1978.1122.1071 page: 4 of 4� Order: 1 Cc®ent: a:..:' CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE N0. 10" AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON VACATING A PORTION OF NORTH 44TH STREET, RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHI*'-_TON WHEREAS a proper petition for vacating a portion of North 44th Street, Renton, King County, Washington, was duly filed with the City Clerk on or about November 8, 1975, and said petition having been signed by owners representing 100% of the property abutting upon such street sought to be vacated; and WHEREAS the City Council by Resolution No. 2011 passed and approved on December 1SA97S., and after due investigation, did fix and determine the 5th day of January, 1976, at the hour of 8:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton to be the time and place for a public hearing thereon, and the City Clerk having given due notice of such hearing in the manner provided by law, and all persons having been heard appearing in favor or in opposition thereto; and WHEREAS the Department of Public Works and the Planning Department of the'City of Renton having duly considered said petition for said vacation, and having found same to be in the public interest and for the public benefit, and no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from such vacation; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described street, to -wit: All that portion of N. 44th Street (S.E. 180th St.) having a width of 60 feet, lying westerly of the westerly right-of-way line of Primary State Highway No. 1 (F.A.I. #F405) as described in a deed recorded in King County under Auditor's File No. 4664242 and lying easterly of the easterly right-of-way line of secondary State Highway No. 2-A extended, said easterly right-of-way line being 30 feet easterly of as measured at right angles to the centerline thereof and together with all that portion of land heretofore conveyed to the STate of Washington by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 4210056 lying easterly of the east line of said Secondary State Highway No. 2-A, extended. -1- PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 26th day of Janu.-My, 1976 Delores A. e APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 26th da of Janixavy, Y197f4' . ..... charle e asren a A e_ve/d as t f erar , ellan, City Attorney Date of Psblication; 1-30-76 SM 1� f r .RI,.E f8... .. _1- . .• .. .. .K_S. �...� ,nu .� .. ...s �w� , k. _ . L� do �.,.a .�s !A�,L ) - .. L...ti .. ... � .... _ As situated within the SW 1/4 of Section 29, Township 24 N,, Range 5 East W.M. and the NW 1/4 Section of 32, Township 24 N., Range 5 East W.M., y King County, Washington ti BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY VACATED, SUBJECT, HOWEVER to an easement over, across, under and on all of the aforedescribed property in " favor of the City for utility and related purposes, k SECTION II: The City Council hereby elects to charge a : t fee of $3,518.75 to Petitioner -Owner, said amount not exceeding 1 L one-half of the City's appraisal of the right of way interests rl.. herein vacated, and such charge being reasonable and proper. SECTION 'III; This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. A certified copy of this Ordiance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections Cin , g County, and as otherwise . a provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 26th day of Janu.-My, 1976 Delores A. e APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 26th da of Janixavy, Y197f4' . ..... charle e asren a A e_ve/d as t f erar , ellan, City Attorney Date of Psblication; 1-30-76 SM 1� f r .RI,.E f8... .. _1- . .• .. .. .K_S. �...� ,nu .� .. ...s �w� , k. _ . L� do �.,.a .�s !A�,L ) - .. L...ti .. ... � .... _ NORTH r ,11 ,PROPOSED STREET 4CATION SISTWQ CITY LIMers"k ZI . A % !.IF) .XJ f a.7 THIS iN379d NnT, sada this 2'i day of JULY 19T5; .n by sAd betvaen PAN AHOOE,4 Irai"_ fesdr �IIY AAfI :FfJSEi �iA E��iji7. .. I sad ; r and i and hereinafter called "Greotor(a)," and the CITY OF REIMS, it Municipal Corporation of Kind County. Vaebington, hereinafter called "Grantee." WITUESSM ; That said Orwtvr{h}, for and in consideration of the muse of nor mI rc, rci Paid by Oraotes, sad other valu►ble coaaideratloa. do ES 1 by thm presents, grant, bardaih, sell, convey, sad varraat unto the said Orontee, ii its suceeaaare and "sign, 0a easommt for public utilities (igcluding nater and @over) vith necessar7 appurtsaw" mr..through. seroas and upon the folTorisg described VrMwrty in King County, Msahiogton, more particulirly described e. roues.: SEE EXIISIT 'W' ATTACHED 10 AND A PART OF THIS EASEMENT TOGETHER WITH A XMIOURART W6TRUCTION EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON EWBIT'rAr' ATTACHED TO ANCA PART OF THIS EASEWNT. :;aid tekparary construction onaea.ent shall rereir, Sri Ibrev during constructi.n and otil such tiar au the utiiittea wd appurtenances have been Accepted for the uperrti,n and ranintenance by the Craatee but n=ut ir+ter than Povember 30, 1975. Description: Xing,WA Doctanent—Yesr.Month. Day. DocID 1975.1008.738 Page: I of 4 Ordaz: I Comment. kl�ru'ci,TS THFAKil 1HAT PORTION OF GOVEMOENT LOT 1, SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 'MT.,' RANGE 9 EAST, W.M,, LYING SOUL! OF TMP. SOUTH LINE OF S.E. 80TH STREET NC SOUTHEASTERLY AV SOURiCRLY OF TK SOU7WASTFRLY LINE OF LAuE WASHINGTON lOUL:V:: D A0 OF THAI CERTAIN PARCil OF L*d) HERETOFORE CONVEYED TO 111E STATE {1) OF K•ASrllr4G ON BY DEEP RECORDED MDER. AUDTTORkS FILE NO. 4210056, IN THE COUNTY i` QF KlNr,, STATC OY slAsHiNGTON, AND LYING WESTERLY OF THE WEST LINE OF SEO4I,I "Y ;u STAT-' i1l"AY NO. 2-A A$ DESCRIBED IN DEED RECDRDFD IN SAID COUNTY UNDER AWITORIS C-.- FILE Wim. 466242, A -A LYRrG "TW-MTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINIING AT A i,, INE UN TW- EAST LING OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT I FROM WHICH POINT ,�-i THE NORTI-CAST CORNEA OF $AID LOT4W-4M MRTM 1042913" EAST A DISTANCE OF W-• 486.8ti FEET, THENCE NORTH 6.'059'05" WEST 1294.28 FLET 70 THE SOUTH'�#STERLY Llik OF Liw: WASHINGTON OOULEVARD. � "EASW�MENT /i�JAP " , S..S. N, Wo. 2•A • M 4 ti -0 M LI�Ert�i E3n,�iiiy A -moo: Description: King,WA Document-Year.Month.Day,DocSD 1975.1008.738 Page: 2 of Q_ Ordar: I Cent: Said heretofore mentioned grantee, its successors or assigns, shall have the right, Without prior notice or proceeding at law, at such times as may be necessary to enter upon said shave described property for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, repairing, altering or reconstructing said utility, or making any connections therewith, without incurring any legal obligations or liability therefore, provide4. that such construction, main- taining, repairing, altering or reconstruction of such utility shall be accomplished in such a manner that the private improvemeots existing in the right :U rigbt(s)-af-way shall not be disturbed or damaged, or In the event they are - ' disturbed or damaged. they will be replaced Lin as good a condition as they were imme41ately before the property was entered upon by the Grantee. The Grantor shall fully use anc enjoy the aforedescribed premises, including the right to retain the right to use.the surface of said right -of -tray +� if such use does not interfere with' installation and maintenance rIF the utility line. However + the grantor shall not erect building$ or structures over, under or across the right-of-way during the existence of Such utility. This easement, Shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be bind- ing on the Grantor, his'fuEcftsors, heirs and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right td execute 1.05 agreement. ,sand and and and STATE OF WASHINGTON 1 1 Ss COUNTY OF KING } `` ' on the■ e!i' day of 1y7� before w, the undersigned, • Notary public in and for elr@ ee aVashington, duly eeaei■ateeed and acorn personally appelred Ale" 4-'0 and --- to a+e knoim tq be the ra+tir'.!,rjr �-r and - , respectively, of %;�.: '44-+'r' Xf • the corporation that executed the foregoing inetrueeat, ord ■ckneii1edded the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of amid corporation, for the uses and purposes therein tantioned, and on oath stated that 114' "f authorited to execute the aid instrusmnt and that the seal affixed to the corporate @eel of said corporation. i1i77CSS wy hand and oi'Licial seal hereto affixed the day and year in this eartifteate aborta written. Notary Public in and for: tr a of ¢ Washington, residing at Description: 1fa.ng,WA Doc=ent-Year.Menth.Day.DocID 1975.1008.738 Page: 3 of 4` Order: 1 Comment: I Id FUD for lord V AwjW 0 FYVrfrFTIT THF. f.Pry ('IjgK ittNTON, WASIL A tdf 1040 197) C.-,: r, , [?,' 2 14 EL CJ: TIO I,!, - X IpIG CO. WN. ­___ DEFuTy Descriptlon , Kingr,WA Document -Year. Month. Day. DocID 1975, 1006, 739 Page: 4 of Order: 1 Common t, Rt.IC�>fALA.-tt�M� titttll.' ` �j] n 1 � �� DEM stet the 1 rdisr of 1'971t1>ZI State Highway No, 1, R>j" TO KFVu= KNOW ALL AINN 8Y THESS PUSENTS, That the Grantor UILL1• TAR. & CM1414" 00RP'ORATI;0K, farnsrl,T liSil'fJ , 0 CM;MQT}ZiC MANN "MWIsm eorporati.on, 10 - for and in Consideralion of the sum of -------------- = AIM titl/Ot-------------------- DMIars, tmd other v4u blo aonslAwedon hereby convey and warrant to the State of Washington, the followinp described real estate silts- ated in Ling County in the State of Washington: All that P*.-Uvn of the fcilodm deseribod Parcel "An 17%ng ooutheastar3,v of the foUuving dasariaod liner 8agUming at a point appoai 4 HL6W1q $lgiooerts Station 5+00 (464+86.9) am 125 coat xort11M6tar17, alien tmeseeared at rpt a0gleo and/or radia33,y trop the center )IN of Priaarr 3tato T;fOmW Ho. 1, Houtou to UmWdala, theme Sout1weatarly in A atrnight line to a, point oppaaitt >tl.g3z "W >tn4weres Station 461+5o and 27$ foot Ne: t2trantarly therafrm ; th&nee No- Unt sterly in a atrsight line at richt wiglea to the BUtOrly right of try* ],ins of LOS Wsihingtoa >3oulolArd to a point of in. toreeation with said right -of way. -Unix; thence 9onthsastarly along said 8astor1y right of trey line of lakm Vaabingtcm 9mlan" to a point of inturaeotion with the HarthorlY right of trgy line of Soathsast 80th Street and the and of this 11ro deo- cription. rarcol "A"s That portion of OoTervmnt Lot 5, Section 29, TMa ip Zit North, Range 5 l;wt 1i.H., lring oaatar],T of the &aetarly right at vV 14no of the North era i'acifia Rmi],sVI Llpsept OCUMV Roads; And Xwept those portions aonMed to Us State of lieaisingtan tar higtav�T Purposes by dvoed recorded undor Audit.orla File Hoa. 3229177 and h1782tt7 =and records of !Ging County; situate in the Gou=ty at lti ng, State of ltanbin¢t;0, - - {�`I,�F\C'f'\R+ 'll (�r� �S''•' f�af ti7fy111jJ i. mai °°i a0nied �I ,' a n�t 7a:2g a� e,W �ts c�r leea the specs c de a concern g a °at� w ec are�o bo found tus eta t�iat rer sin mai of deAnife t1K,ulinn nosy of record and oil file in the office of the Director of highways at 01Uvnpin and bearing date +ef ap- protal June k, 1963, wad the aentur lino of vhirh is also shwa of record in delutrlo , of ewW elate, para $1, records of aai,.l nec=tar. Alan, tho grantor herein ocn4vg8 and xarraat to the State of BaahisWtati all ria,hta of irs eas and sq usa (3mludiitig &U &=dating, futusa or mtont;4& eanaaeats or toaoss, light, view and air) to, from slid botuoon hizA y Stats Righway Ho. 1, Samoa Croak to iicodland and the ruminder of oaid Peroel "A". The undersigned agrees to tturruder possession of the pramboa comra-,fed horoin on ar before Ff$Xj(tl,ry /a 1%4,/ It is underztood and agreed that the delie:ery of this deed is hereby tendered and Ihat lite teens and obtig,- ums hereof shall not become binding upon the State of Washing.on unless slid Lentil accepted and approvrd hercon in writing for the State of Washington. Deparlment of highways, bh the Chief Right of Way Agent. Dated this ..% 4. ....._day af.. .. 'fie,+, c.� ! y 6 3 Pa1`Ce7 1-'7896 REILLY TAH 4 CIMUCAL COMPURAt •' r �,�; 'i RI?Pt BLIC CHL.'OSMIHG COYPAFY :+tcrcptcd and approved- ./ ~ r1 .. -" 1/1 T. P.cillr, flz px;iit STATE OF WASH1NC;T014 DM Or M03WAYS Chief tti#hl of wel+ Agent` Deacripti.on; King,B*A Desch-Doald 5687408 Page: 1 of 2 Order: I Comment: - ��;n%rn Yn::��ro�..ar.4.r.�•,.—.�.r. �w.{�l..o+ �wLh. (tndhidutl mcknowltstamtnt tem) STAT& or WAblt3tttmoff, County 1, the undiraiprted, a notary public In and for the State of Muhington, hereby certify that on this appeared before me Rif to rie kno-son to be the individual.._ described In and who execttied the foregoing Instrument, arui (w. knowiedged that .sigtted and seated the tams as .._-....-._free and voluntary act and decd, Jar the toes and puiposes therein tnenlitmcri, Given under my hand and official seat the day and yeur last above written. N.l.ir N4tte leant lar die Sm.- ct Wc:hMV1tm!, Realdhta al ....,.. . MIANA (Curporstim aeknowledament term) STATC air VAmmmmW I Countyi(A}lIQll } aa. ' ' ` 1. , .. lie fore me per olmll y np�wn red Qtt this......�t)..._._... dttU of..... � .=s�r'.n..�-c--.... �.� ... . ...... ►,ilei lr-... ..._... ........ ..........and ....... .... ... to me knoum to be the..,.,...,'lict!_lrnt►ideitit .. and.._-. of the corporation Ant erectile l the foregoing instntment, and acknotoledgad said inslrum4tsi ao.bu, rice free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes thercitr'A 44ayd ho vee . ' + ''''a t E IN on oath slatsd that...._................,_..,,.�...._.._—authariied to es:ecute said instruntcnM cti'kdaliatl �'jA V&ed is the corporate seal of said co "ration. ' '�lr - Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above Cwritien, tlotLry 14011e In and Jar tthr State o%4'rd t era MleiWtnt►at .J�'rr��.rJ�• J' ... l,..i �� .21 I i 1 1 V � t VOL........................... l t PAG!'... ",ITST OF _� W C �� y MA .thy !S M 11 36 dl � t•,cu�. �.ulaa �� I W KiK. '10.Y M„1Sii, C� ...�.. - .t'PUN +` • R r � �� w Description: Kingr,WA De*da-DccSd 5687408 Page., 2 of 2 Order: I Comment : - - m IN THE KATUR Or � � l.ir KNOW ALL M]RA BY 771992 A ` �y.' x",�, YMit tAs Qeamler liA.X4lLW 00x9 W , a wilseu, for and in eonriderdtion of the�of TU 6md MM%W - - - - - - - - - - - and stltsr v M - ` "' ' - ,+aMilr4t,:. in hand pard, the recti pt whereof i6 h@rg4 6e+hamiedoad. ar WA=UXar0X, the fo! �*� - awd trsr.ear_. _ !a file MrMts tnu� described rani tsrrtit sltrated in County, in the Stage al WasMrptm: A atrlp of land Pit} feet rine, bel" ].?5 fast .riga aro each aids of UND Maser Jim at -4, ANAm fa110vink described Pareal `4". �; M � " e*er ewf amm" iia 3scor►dsr) Stats Mo. P PARCEL "A" That portion of t30res�t I#t 1 is GOMM 5i, T@MWM P 26 NWU. 1n" !Cant ii- M. , described es fo,tlsrs r t*gisning 4t a pi -it w MW Masoril liner or add 4aM mt t LK 1, freak which the M66-thowt emmm M~ rear, ne tb is hat li' am* a di.stonae of 30.00 to"tbp&" Ogg" Is hit lee fMwa +tlay a�,d �rt- o rly line, 13011.75 let to V& S MS0 6K om lrr. VJ %* 0 YMOalM A Lot l i t homm Morth Me hf t � 611. x 4We 4 i""ove x� 111 02 Leat 16:. ss R`6+t; tlta�ae r.r+ i xr t W V40 5? fma to a Point tram which Ww Northern sash* K M&id OreaaamMt Let 1 it1�s6+s as follow, `Mari& 12e 1`91 30* jast U.57 te"I Maw W b. 54+ Last 955.66 fest; and UortA le 112 130 so" 67h.3f Lka9461 trace leen said last described Point North 776 10, 300 fest .10 feet to a pint n the Solakeastsrl,y margiA of 3000 AU Dbstseta # . P -A (ALS i;,;t!dN AS lake Ma6hitm Houleari) a6 skwl easterly, along said Seuthgat�a 1 �aeaa kiakmerth- �+�r4l.le1 to and 'ib feet '3eYt� tnM at a Roiai< ]1aa �Ilkiclt 1s Northerly Iina of acid t]ov { � at rift i6sl*a) from the East, clop" said psaid GO limp no of 11 ihenee SwttMk W tj0, 10` "arttm thereof described as follows, QitLTT rant 8evi"'ng at s point ON the :esterly 1iae of Mid 0c"rameltt -ot 1, from which the Northeast corder thereof bears XOpU 10 42, 13` 4 -ant a dietanae of 993.80 f&6tJ threes South 10 42' 1.90 rhsslang said Easterly lim, 340.55 fest to the Seutbeast ooreer of L, t, L ilotiert- anent Loot 7 ; thence North 6 0 481 513" wee, 11"151 t.ne Southorlp lift* thtrsnf, 661.35 feed toeace North la 111 020 teat, 34u.55 test, / more or Image to 4 point from which ter point of be#,—, s hears I ouLh efl Lc! ► 55` icer; thence SoutA Rea, 55` sort GW+.J1la test sore or less, toUWPiot of beginning; situate is the Com et King, Stats of Mashir4ton.Of �ilds i de+ l+et , - l:(7alvvy*d lsarr'$' are xexaLain aul a Of 5.50 ncrtg ,.urs or 11466, ins iiia aV ; trninp all of whieb an to be found within the' certain - lc:cation now of record and oa fi]f ixt the office of the Director of H nw * ] jWjata and bearing pato of approval April 12th, 1955. � �e at �3],1►rpia Alec, tike grantor hereu: ^on•rfs and warrants to tt;e SExra of WAXIIia, Lars ail Mgbtal of invrasa and agrees ( iarlu�ing all eri6ting, future or potootial eseertnLs of access, , view and air ) to, 'rem add **%ween Sme"xis,27 gtate Hi h t and the rommUder of &aid Parcel "A". K ' ' so• ?-Ay Fhmun to [amrgrdals It is Oxpressly iateaded that U�..0vowts, tardau and restrictions shall rm with the land and forever bind the-•ratetor, her beim, suasseeors or sssiins. It Zs u ftaentWd d .d -Ad ar* and vbti_qjtjou becallw Oki h,-reoft in U,ritiv. for the Stab V5 oIlm f 4�6100'014'4i��b;i;it.7,.,Jp,-�- ;'Wc- y tmwc Ow ftht lTMTPXAYS 1Y of J Ul lV(�,;hmqioe4- Jjpj,,1r2; L.j, or Tb:s p l"kr*t rove mc her io! So& t tl vix F-83 J AN I i 00ty *ASK, axd obtip4 approved h"90% ,Dated this.... Y l,, .�.� s Accepted and ap K STATE Of WASii71IGTON .,...... .._ _.......... DrP r. HrCttwers - .......... RiLhl of Wau Snpine�. STATF. OF rASIiiNC'�n`. !, th uwlerciurlM, rt nrntaf!j public in and fr)r the State of 65 azhington, hereby certify chat an th,'s 9 th daij of Jawspy, 13'SQ. neravna,Iy appeared before me &Marat Colt" h to n!r kns"'12 to lie thr- ilJ(!i �idual describers ¢n and u)ho executed the fort>rIn fq itr.ctrimient, and cr- knowicdged rizat. - a.M- Sic)ve[i and .seaters the su7ne as .hak. fr!'B and vnluniaru lcL't,!))rt d4-ed, for the lcsc^ anti purposys therein tneutirned. Given lmdr)- My :unci nnrl ofjicied seal the dal) a+trI Vjnt !ctst uLut+e v)rittv)l. f J; Ncdpfj/Yubhic to and tur V", S1alr of Wa Mmll+nn, Residing at 3M ttl46 Pad Quendall Company alo Kid* Mathews b Segner, Inc dba.GIdA iGdder Mathews 1A6 Interurban Avenue South eaftWA 98188 Flamer: Contractor To Whom K may concern: Notice is hereby given that the WaWngton Blvd, Renton, WA detrcdptlon Is attached. the premises srlmM at 4350 lab w toulady desonbed as follows Regal Labor, servi%;`equipn*opt or materials has been contracle4y Trnpotma W4'iWop;:j=,:;7.9KW. Gpimgfidare Way, Seattle, WA.`;i8199w •." ,.. That the Andate•'oirwtuch•:the undersigned obtained knowledge that labor;-eer teequ�prnent -or mates7al 'were supplied to the above doicnbed"proorty wgs on the 3N day of Deioember, 2003, and notice 4 posted irr-ponoanoe wuid•the Laws of the State of Was6ingtonrirrMun.ien (14) days of acquiring such knowledge, and a copy of the same wll be filed tR.Jhe Chico of the County Recorder wh&e the:above;descabed properly is situated And that ttio pn¢sisugn@ dustlarms a0liaWity or responsubillity, either express or tmpked, for ally Work, fndudmg the furnishing ofm*nals or the perfbmlanoe of -labor That has been done, or is being done, or will be done on the kgyia described premises Dated 1hi9-9e.day of Dscembdr, 20D3 Name Pod.GUeldalfCo#,Wy By Kidder MathdwrE 8 ft"ner, tic dbe GVACIdt£r Mathews II's Property Manager Address 12888 Interurban Avenue ScQ.th Signature State of Washrr►giton County of ling on thus 1p day of December, 2003, blare me, Danita Stratton, Notary Pubko, pbhw be the person that executed this xr0mmertt on behalf of Pott Quendall Company, and Danita L Stratton —7, 29 -C�.0 My commission expies .'SIOM''••r�0th a 4 y tf t40TARY'�,•, ! 1 red.,tulre -K-SM, pereonallX known to me to Igekl to ripe to she'led d* Daacriptlonr rtng,W^ Document-Ye&r.Honth.Day.Doc2D 2004.112.381 Pagas I of 3 Orders lung Camments ..:P5/17/01 09 00 FAX 206 248 7330 QUADRANT/KMS MGT QKMS EVERETT 1 024/025 EXITIBIT A TkAT ?.bRTI02f'OF.._GO7ERNHENT LOT 1 114 SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, OP VAP.AM IqQRTHZXST 44TH STREET (SOUTEELST BOTH STREET) .:'AS .."VACATED TlNDER.,`:kk�qRDISG NO. 7602260427, DESCRIBED AS F0. FTS BEGiNK±KG'AT SAID GOVEPNXENT LOT 1; TH3ENCZ"-K6RTK 0' " 71190, M NORTH YXNE TEEkMr, 797.3 FEET, XORZ OR V'tNTZR�-:-`S!�kTXON 4+65. AS DESCRIBED UNDER 6 RECORDING 14QS. 42,100,55 U.0,'Jgli-121-0i; I - 212-411 VE! SET TO M BEGnWNING OF A CURVE ON THENCE. SCU!JM_`A� .1 ii�' 3 0. THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF S= IMCAT9D S.E. BOTH STRE TEE MrM OF WHICH BEARS Q' SOUM SII 2$6.50 FEET; THENCE w-ESTERLY AND,: SViV . WES.Md'y 0�` A wua-, THE ikR6 t::QF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 204 _Mt,! HOAZ OR -tEss " "'To TICE' X-I4'N*'RIVxRT-OF-VAY LM AS DESCRIBED UNDER RECORDXKG AkD TRE..'TRUR POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE FORTEXASTERLY, &Z.694- A'$C.., r SX= TO THE RIGHT TKE CENTER Or WHICH BXhAS SOUTH 'tS#02-114' FAST %r3.;L5..,s2­-7XET, TO THE NORTH LIKE OF sAilp GOVERNMENT LOT 11 THENCE SQ0THI:08047136- FAST, ALONG LIKE OF $ECONDARY STATE xxaRVAY A$ CON7TED WMZR pXPORDTNG NOS. 4664242; THL-NcE SOUT.R'.CRL�-, A=NC; SAID WESTERLY L1�4E ;'T-0. TUE., So LINE OF A TAACT---,Op Lum CONVEYED TO .-.lty.',DMW;RECORDED UNDER RECORPING;'NO48:56255; THENCE NORTH.,". 624'59005- "ST, ALONG SAID sOu-,vilw4.STZZZ'y Tln, TO THE SOUT:gEAStERL� LINE OF LAKE VASKINGTON BOULEVARD 1_2C* DEqCPLLBSD UNDER RECOkDING NO. 4`21-0615e; -.' .: ... ..., THENCEff(?RNWr TERLY, .. ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE", A= --''TEE ,fZAS'ftlMT` TtaINE ".0 " V 4 , TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED To THt':STATE OF WASHINGTON BAY DEEZ nCORDED trNDER RECORDING NO. 4210056 TO THE TRUE 517CATE IV THi CLTY' 10 'RENTPN, ';COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. 'PARCEL B. "10T ToWiTSHIP 24 OR THAT PORTION OF G0VMtNXEXT- I .:'S 4N 4E CtX 9K� 2 9, N Tx RANGE 5 EAST W.H. AM i0f 'rTAQAT-,=,,-_-44T-liS-tRkEt-NORTHFAST (SOUTHPAST 80TH STREET) AS VACATED VND6t­"b0 I RDI�G $0_:`780250427, .:, 1'*DESCRIBED As FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHFMT CO rEgNMEN'z LOT 5; THENCE NORTH 01012-'2411 FAST TF=NCE NORTH 88047136m WEST 563 - 6 8`--7 Fr4ET To OF A TRACT AS DESCRIBED UNDER RECORDING NO!. 1811-'22107i AND" THE tTwE 'POINT OF BEGINNING OF TIME TRACT HEREIN THFXCZ SOUTH 30*211540 EAST 35.21 FE= TO:: THE sbtrrH Llitz ,...OF s4tp GOVMUDMNT LOT 5; THENCE NORTH Sa047136- WEST, ALQFG SAID S0UTH:7LI$F% POINT ON THE ARC! OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE -tm'To Ar -?,Rs SAID POINT BETlqG ON'M"WiStERL SOUTU 44414151" FAST 1,115.92 FLMT, LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED UNDER RECORDING No. 79`11221.Oi; Doserlptiont KlngWA DOCUMent -Year. X=th. DaY. Doc= 2004.112.561 Pagot 2 of 3 Order: King comments OaJ17/O1 49 00 FAX 246 248 7330 QUADRANT/KMS MGT iii QKMS EVER= 1024/025 EX91BIT A r PaRTIoN' oF•-GQYERNXEKT LOT I IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 ZtORTfi, RA24GE:l5 BASTW.M. .AND OF VACAT= NORTIMAST 44TH STREET (SOUTSEAST BOTH STREET) ::AS.: �ZACAT D iTNDlC ''kEC0nTKG Na. 7602250427, DES=BBD AS SEGlrrtt N6' �iT NQRT� FAST'.^,CoA AER ;s:'or SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; TEZNCE 'NORTH $8447!36"' WESTl"�ALQ�!?dti% NORTH LINE THE=DF, 797.2 FEET, MORE OR LESS 'QG�S.STATIOK 4+65.6 AS DESCRIBED UNDER RECORDING N0.S.. 42JO066 THENCE SOUTH ''D1 •'XZ � � 4' fiEST 30., :' 60 'E: RT TO THE SEG120MG OF A CARVE ON TEN SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF s .,4►TED S.E. BOTH STREET, T92 CENTER OF WHICH BEARs sotrrH '_b1'l2 ►24e ,WEST 7:56.5.0,,. FEET; THENCE WESTERLYASU SOUTIgi+TE�lr;ONC�iI$ -ASC .AF spam CURVE, A El-, -- --- - - DISTANCE OF 204 FEET. MO�tE .bR,,'LESS TO THE, X--Link RIGRT-OF-•WAY LINE AS DESCRIBED UNDER RECORDII(G HG.:'' 7&i221,07:1 AND ;TAA TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG ARC: OF Skit :-tV�CVE TO TKE RIGHT THE CENTER C F .:WHICH SEARS SO[tTA 5S' 0 ' 3. "' „,EAST ;<3 ,1;IS , S 7 FEET, TO.. THE NORTH LINE OF SAI'ia. GOVERNMENT LOT 1; :.. :;' : . THENCE So 7TH'' 48647,3611 EAST, AL0I1q SA.IA,:�'NiiTH LI'DT.. ;.-7, O ,:-THZ. VZSTERLY LINE OF ,.SECOND,RY STATE 1YIGHWAY NCI`s:,; 2_-„ri5 Cari�IE3v'DTNnLRt�'ORl3xNG NOS. 466424.2; THENCE Sout- AMY, A=XC SAID WESTERLY LINE; Ta THE:; SOS} -a"STERLY LINE OF A %tACT Off' LAND coXVEYEO To P_AN-ABODE, - iNit_ ,:. 8Y DE$V,?RECORDED UNDER RECOROINQ: NO;s 4856255; THENCE N`RTii 5I:ffi59,o5r WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTY L7. ri, TO THE SO EASTERLY LIKE-•'QF. LAXE wASHINCTOil BOIILEVARi� AS .DESCA:' BFM UNDER REcbRDlt.fG ,:NO. ;,`421Ob587.. } THENCE 90*Ti3�lSTERLY, ALONG SAID SOUTHEA,SMLLY LINE "AM' THE SOuttzAS'rERL'Y .;:LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE'` -STATE OF WASHZ�7GT0K:8Y:YDEED REC RI?FA•.,VNAER RECORDING NO. 4210056 TO THE TRUE PormT OF`'"SEGZ�iN NGS SITUATE IN TH'E CY.TX pF' RENTgN, CQ;MTY OF KING, STATE OF WASAINGTON. PARCEL 8: THAT PORTION of GovmvocoiT ).O s;?'-Iii ToWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST.W.M. AND bF,,VACATE 44.TH .:WgkE .-xgRTH?AST (SOUT'HFAST BOTH STRE=) AS VACATED UNDER RECdRDYNG.:'KO. 7.6022644,27, DESCR2BED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIVYING AT THE SOUTMST CO'iI Of S�A.ID Gt] IEr3T LOT 5; THEPTCE NORTH 01,12424- EAST 3 0 _ 0&;-.1kZ$•;I. ., THENCE NORTH 86447136- WEST 563.68 k'EEZ^' TO `THE tkSTEMY LINE of A TRACT AS DESCRIBED UNDER RECORDING NO'7412 lq-71.:-- iD THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT $ZN DESCRIBED: THENCE SO'U'GH 30021154^ EAST 35.21 FEET TO --.T-RZ .'$ori L o>� SATS} GOVERNMENT LOT 5;;� '"..FEET THm4CE NORTH 86147'36p WEST, AYaONG SAID SO[7TH..,..L.I�i£ TO "--A 42 =2,4 , POINT ON THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CEN'£ER:��*:.,WHxCH: SOUTK 44"14' 51" EAST 1,115.92 FEET, SAID POINT BEING ON :-T� YrES�F.R�3L' ' LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED U DER RECORDING NO_ 78-1123iG71;: Description, Ki i, p apr.Wll Decuaeertt-Yeer.Montb.Day.DocTO TdQ�.122.36I pAQe, 3 C! 3 Orders ]Cine Comsat r Filed for Record at Request of: King county Water District No, 107 7415 129th B.E. Renton, WA 98056 NBTICE Cp ADOPTION OP IMMR 9ANBUL I &UTILB_CAARQA King County Water District No. 107, ]fine County, WaBhington, hereby gives notice of the adoption of certain sewer general facilities connection charges pursuant to Resolution No. 1310 adopted by the Board of Commissioners on August 14, 1991 applicable to the areas shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A." Elmer F. Poster, secretary Board of Commissioners King county Water District No. 107 GT: sLs/330Sn 1 09,U NE I00 SM39 6A1M UIX Md > ilp 10 tfig.IF6016 rr 'T tTR� '7.170' . yti-. u n u m :7-,--1 777 • f, IN THE NATTZR DT KNOW ALL MEN BY ?iiESR P!:' =, !'11q filer 04000 far and in conriderntion of the o} 710M&- ._ - - - - „ _- - - - - and otkor ra>ss a�om - - - in hand paid, the receipt wberrsJ ie hww4 whnotofodped, CW WAMMUM x, the Jallowitrp deseribod rent exiou aeeasted m y _ swd iraswat ss !M �11ea+a County, in the state of WiffsA 'Ot": A ■trip of Isnd 25o fast ride, bei#r Secondary State iiig6uw U0. 2-A 125 xset rids 04 asab sddtl o! the Mars aMr Bat , followin*sa deribsd PM01 "A". 14ntsm toamua as ot1rveri wwr Mo some" Wo FAF.CEL TA" That portion of Go"yoo ,t int 1 I& &e1`tsn 1Z, TerMU fa211 i1s'ik, y� fast X.M., dsaorib d sa follows Eoeinnint at a point s4 We Ms4orU lime of ft" tiewa=alsls►a Lt 1, from xhi4* Woo VGrLhaart paler %hsraw Moss Meet! id W 13o ismt a di.starlca of 30.OD fo"I tbeaee testi Is hp 13. 1b/#'P +nems Ned orf,• r rly 114r, 1301.35 f ms to me dw111m&M meet W. at .0" ilPw&staMM Lot 11 then" Morth W hr! r go 1�, til. ]� toot1 iirsmeis some 3.0 it t 02 Fast 164.58 root; tMss so 11orMi1 r 'ji a W " Mf.3t last to t point from wfiloh UWSortLwx a�r of 6"d 00906MMOSt lot 1 Mmsf As f011owe t r kwU 124 49' 300 t sit ULST lost $@go dim i&, S*s East 955.66 fret; aoa North 1e 41 130 � 64.]� �Ko1 assess from said last described point *or" 790 101 300 lest hDd !o feet to a pint rn the Soutnaaater],T aar�in of 1;,;i'4iN A Lake lfeattiLM ,ALton Houle") as am @h� to• me r%h aRatarly, aloe[ raid Soathaago 1 ; Me1k i paraliol to and ',Vj foot 9oatit �r9d & f° a Point 311 rr= tdxtsle i! Northerly line of said OoverMMMA reed at right stltlos) from the East, 410nK said parallel bees, to the pointt 11 tbon" �In � �r 10, uortiDn thereof describod as follower OotirerriaCl XL that Barinni.np at a pDint an the liaetsray Tins of amid 00"rawsat i.ot 1, from which ties 1larthGASt tOMer thettof beam Moru 10 42, 13" last a distance of 943.80 feet; then" south to 42' 1.3• west, slone said Eastorly line, 340.55 foot � to LM &outbs"t Corner of said awftm- ment List 7 ; thsnos ]forth ",o LOO 58" timet, OMP the Southerly lira [unroof, 6+61.35 foot; tdsncs North 10 ill 02" Last, 36u.55 f"%, / more or ;soma, to a point from whict► tis pout of brelaaiat '*are 1 ,Doth 88 int! 55" ta+st; remora SautA MO V, 551" tart UA -44 foot, mors or logs, to the point of oosinaing; oituato 1A the Corarty of King, State of washirgton. ii,� lmu�a i+aiu. ��urseyed ls�rrifl vu��i.in �k arya Of S.j� YCr`if s.CrTa or iarr, tat ij.#- 1f;C 1M ab am to be found within the' certain lneation neer of record and ca MO in the offiew of the Director of K hes ys ]Mj*to and tearing cats of goproval April 12th, 1955. yrs at �37Jripia Alno, the grantor haroij_ ..^onreYs and warrants to tees SLAt- of kashiA, ton all rUbta of irvreaa and • ress ( inc'„Iigg all aristimf, future or potw,tial sasem4nta of &cases, , view and air to, !ram and aatwwn Saecs►dar�. State }fib �t sold the reminder of said i'areel "A•. K Mo. ?-Ai llsritan Lo Lsme�dal<e It is expressly 3Atamied that theM coveasats, ourdaaa and restrictions mball pas pith the land and forarrr bind the ;,raster, ter heirs, euasassors or **signs. i ? X Umeerstmd and agre4ft� not "PP`L;ed hereon in writjV, . r the & —,bir MW ftht.,o , ie (If MzY Engineer, Dated this.. L'TATE Of IVArIIIANGTOIN 1.)17 'els''.. . !;;.;, . o.. her -Lar 40 SWIL t 411d obtiyt—1 ' of Wal! rngo'44r. " Dated a Accepted and approved..__..,.Jr. + STATS WASHINGTON DRP T' HSt%xwATS ay�� Rluht of Wats Engin, S'ra•rP OF` ur1S?[i NC?'rrl\- > v5 CrJr[1ut� of R�t3 J f• the unrlelsitt�rt<d, r nrotr[ttf public in an'i Y- V4., State of Vf'aahington, hereby certify jfuat on th,'s 9, til dcr?! n f Ja 11MALWYs. 1956rersotta;ly appeared 'uefore trte lianarat Copt >4 r, Tru knotf•?t 10 JJC 0'Z - i7ldit•ir%11a1 describer! ztt and who ereerjted the fr-reftning instrument, rrnt{ ur- J;nou,tC'riner2 t)utt ."* Signori MIA seafed the Same as her. fri-e and vo?untar)J rlcr +rud deed, for fJaC +<;c {[nri purlJose.e tJrereir IJWWi4Re& (:tnr t undr'r 11121 hunt nn.! of?iciai sea? the «ext tlnc! year ? si abin+e xnritten. Notcty/Nul+Hc in CnJ far [r,r �rnfr o{ Wunh+nUro�• ti rridin(1 Ui 3K tltrj� Rmim ai.ki! MED IN TU MATTTi Or Vt 405 (PSI Iso. 1), t46104 to [412214816 (ISCeea Right of Vey). RM ALL 1SR1 BT T1tggl FUSiVU. that the STATE Or 11AS1111=01, for and in conatderatton of '1110 RM00SA10, SIPII 11t1RDaw, rIFTr ko w1wo (62,750.00) DOLLARS hereby contaya and quitclaLMs unto PAY-A&WI, DKMPORATEO, a YaabinRtoo corporation. ■ll.Lte riglt, title and interest. to &%d to the falloviug described rat property @Lto+ted in Slug County, State of Yasbl"tons Those portions of Gotlr12•enl Lot 1, Section 12. Toueabip 24 S4rtb, Raegs S Inst, Y.M., and at Goverment Lot 3, Section 29, sold Toraship and Range, described on falloevs le;Lnuing sit a point on the sortb Ilse of said goverment Lot 1 lortb 66'41'36' Ysat 791.2 feet, Mors Of less, fro* tU eortbaaat corner tioreof, sand point beiy at ligbray UpLasev'9 Stattoa (biretaaftat refsrrad to as US) 4+83.6 0e the tesporsry Conusctian surrey of State ngbray Sorts Mo. 403 (SIN No. 2-►), lsnaydale lortb, tho specific details coectraing. all of vbicb say ba found as @beet 1 of the pias tharaof ear of record and an file Is tbs offfe■ of the secretary of Tt"Sportatio9 at Olympia, Vaebiagtoo, Dearing. data of approval February 7. 19501 tboace South 01'12'24' Yost 30 feet to the eortberly Mas=ta of vacated foutbeast 60tb Street a: the point of curve of a curve to the left, cAu radial center of ,bich brute Saatb 01812"14' Went 256.5 feet; thence unatsrly and sactb+estsrly, parallel vitb said Tsaporary Coas@etica survey, to isteyeact t1a Y -Line right of rex line of Stets Wilbray soots 150- 405. Santos to gannydale; tbasee mttbeagtsrty. along 5914 x-Ltns right of ray line, being a curve to tA@ right bating a radtas of 1115.92 feet to intersect On SA -Line rtgAt of may line of nand HigAuay at a point 30 feet soutbeesterly, %be* somored radially, from uatA I -Line surrey and at a polat 07.56 fest sortb5s51e1rly. wton measured along said 1-11s4 right of say 1118. fraM a point opposite 4113 1 998+05.94 and Soath 591021161 Sant 30 feet therefrom; tbesca goutb W59147' Let, 91009 said IA -Lion rtglt of ray 11124- 11.60 feet to the pofat of torts of a curve to the left barlag a radia. of 180 feats thence cootinuisg os Mrd SA -Line richt of say liao, along said carte, in are dintcacs of 68.23 feet to the point of curve of a curve to the rigbt Awing a radius of 120 fasts t'renes contusing on said SA -Liss right of ray lila, ale" said carve, an arc diatanee of 62.00 fast to tha eortb@rly mstgie of gold vacated Southeast Socb Street; tbsncs South 68'47'3610 Test 70.46 test alcog said oortberly margin. beiag ala@ a r1zU of say line of said Highway; tbesce SMAA 30'21'34' test, along a right of Mey line of geld liigbray, to tie eottb IL" of Mid Goverment Lot 1; tbaeee wartb 86047'16" want, alar* said sortA line, to the point of beginsisg.s together rith any adddtiosal portion of sold t4caced yootbeest 80tit Street that aatacbes to On above described property by "*ratio* of lar. Le. 17-11-02311 I% �kvs,: vV, (`f►T REOU"IED r, -:_is Ciwi0l Page 1 of 3 pages O p1 X. %i _ tg a Description: lfing,WA Document -Year. Month. Day. DOCID 1978,1122.1071 Page: I of Order: I Comment: Reserving Mato the State of V66164tom. its sseceemors or aasiges, 1aasenent for tb* operation, utatenaice, reCnnatrectiwa and paction of a closed pipe draiaalm system to be installed b7 tbs srantae harots over, ander, across and upon that portion of tba above described property 17109 +ith[n a atrlp of land 10 feet to width. Leine 10 feet in vtdth on each ride of the follovisg described centse !tact Eagiosiag at a point opposite 1196 11002+41.3 on said I -Else surve7 of Mid Iighrtj and 104.5 feet southeasterly therefrosi tbesw south 66149151 Vomit. through o point on said I -Use right of way line opposite US 11000+23.0 on said I -Lim survey and 36.5 fest southeasterly tharefr9a, 150 feet to the cwt of We teeter ltaa descrtptioo, it being aoderetood and agreed that no pecaeneat structure will be located on the shore described easewsst prenimea. !hs grantee herein, its successors or s"Ips , shalt hams no right of ingress• and egress to, ftor and between said 61t 105 and aha lands berets ceaveysdl nor @hall the grantee hermit, Its weoeseor■ or nasi:*.. be entitled to oarpensation for any two of 11SM. miev ad alt occasioned by the location. coustrectloo, walntenance or opsratioa of said hlgbws7; EXCEPT that sold grantww, its suecessors or assigns, *ball have reasonable Ingress aid egress to, fear and between the RA -Elam rasp as constructed at the oortbYrly sargfn of said vacated Southeast Both Street sod the I - Lina right of way wuthaestsrl7 of a line draw radially @outbaasterly fro* US LIA 11002+15 00 said I -Line survey. The specific datatls concersin all of vhIch way be found va !hast 6 of that certain plan entitled SR 405 (PSK Ifo. 1), Reatoo to rennydals, ser of record and on fits it the office of the Secretary of Transportation at olyapia, Yashisgtoo. bsaties date of @yprGYel .Taos 4. 1963. lie lauds herein described art not required for State bigbwsy purr j and are convey+d parso"t to the provisions of Chapter 76. Lows of 1977, Mrst 9xtraord1a:ty Seastoo. Dated at Olympia, Washington, tbls _L4day of NHaor/oe , 14 03V. S T A 7 I 0 1 V A 9 1 1 A 0 x 0 V. A. ZMAE. leeret 7 of Trasaportattos I.S. 17-A-02511 Page 2 os 3 Tagil Descziptl.on.' King,WA Aoevment-Year. Month, Day.Docla 1978.1122.1071 Page. 2 of Order; 1 Comment. s,I i APP�YLD ks TO PDR'![: Lstast Attorsay General UVILVm AS TO tM, IF: � Abode, licorpor4ted N 3TATR or VAsarwrod ) ss Couety of Tharston ) on thia_f� _-der of V4*40+ , 19-.r, before to personally ■ppeared V. a. g%"y. Immm to ae as the Secretary of Trensportatioe, YsebtMtos State Departseet of Traaspartsttoa, sad essested the 6"WiaS Lnstroaeat, acknoinedslmg said iaatnwaeat to be the tree eo3 voluntary act and deed of the State of VuhinStoa, for the ones and porposse thareia mmtloaad, sod oa oatb stated that be in authorised to execute said Lastrusest. Given under my baud ase offklAl seal the day ease year last abuts vrlttea. notary Public for the State arc} ....Thrr's, of Vasbinitoo, re idtaR rt llyaple. �r/f'OIt�'l�J I.C. t7 -A-03311 Pape 3 of 3 Pages Description: King,TPA Month . Day. DocSD 1978.1122.1071 Page: 3 of Order: 1 Comment: ■ w o b w0 +- P .A E zo p� a l.EP for Rbmfd'°Wftuest ol v G 4 { SIATT OF WASMNGTOH 1. k c 2 # Depamnunt of Tra.-u PA i-on"5 Land L%".V , K,-,hw'jT k vita 9w2m4 aC t . O{YMPA WUNWon 9604 ` 1 Description: King,WA Documont-Yoor.bdonth.Daay.DoclD I978.1122.1071 Page: 4 y of 4� _. Order: 1 Co=ent: r- ' 0 4UiT CuA1K DIED 11 TIE AVER Or SE 405 (PSK Lb. 1), lentvt 10 Ie04041e (IYceaS light of Way). xWd ALL MM {T TMI MESEM . that the STATE Or WALU MCf0M, for and to consideration of IVO TlOI?S4M0, StYRM MUMnIED, FIM AND 00/100 (=2,750.00) DOUAIS hereby conveys an4 quitclai=m unto /JM-Abm , EK=1?D1ArZD, ia Washington corporation. all it■ right, title af0 taterest. is and to } the following described real property eltoated in Iiag County, UAW Of Washington: f4 Ttwea portLone of coeeremeft Lot 1. Sectton $2. Towashlp 24 worth, Raote 5 East, W.x., and Of GOvetiaaent LOR S. Section 29, said Tovasbip sod Range, described a• fsllOrr: beginning at a point on the wrth Ilse of said CoverOMent Lot I ! Worth 88'A7'36' Welt 797.2 hat, More or less, frog the eortbesst ! corner tbareof, said polar being at Liigbrny USinser's ststiOs (hereinafter referred to as M) 4+65.6 one the Temporary Cofneetlos survey of state wighety Soeto no. 403 (3511 wo. 2-A•), Iefnydal■ worth, the specific details coacening all of Mhicb May be fose3 oa ghost 1 of the plan tbersof nor of record ad on file in the offtco or the Soetetary of Transportation at 01pW14, Watlington, 1aarLag data of approval rebrsary 7, 19501 thoncs South 01'12124" Ver: 30 fast to the soutbarly Martin of vacated Sewtbeaat loth street a: i tbs paint of carve of a evrve to the left, t%o radial center of Arch bears Sostb 01'12.24' West 256.5 fest: tbenct rautarly and southwesterly, parallel +Lith s4id Temporary Connection nor 67, to ietafsact tis I -Linc right Of Vey line of State fighny SOote MO. 405, Eentoo to Ram►ydalel tbemee Mortbeasterly. Along said I-Lise right of ray line, being a cane to tbo right baying a radisS of 1115.92 feet to fMterseet tfe Ell-liwa right Of Vey lino Of said Migbmay at a paint 50 feet soetbea■terly, ,d,en Meaaersd radially, } from acid I -Lina Survey and at a point 437.5` fast sortbagtrrly, (k Nsa stasared along said Y -Lina rigbt of tial line. from a point opposite US 1996005.44 sad South 59501'14" East 30 feet therafroM; thence Soetb 32139147" List, along said EA-Uine rtght of ray line, 11.60 fact to the point of curve of a cane to the left baviag a radius of Igo feet; tbafca continfing on said S► -Line rigbi of way { Him. along said cervo, an are distance of 68.23 feet to the. point {}j of tune of a curve to the right My iwg a radius of 120 frets t'rence continuing an sold R4 -Lion right of Ley line, alemg said carve, as Arc distance of f2.80 feet to the eartberly Margto of said vacated Southeast 80th Street; thence Swtb 89"47136" East { 7D.46 fest along Said fortborly Margin, being alts a right or ray line of sold 111Shway; tbests Sost► 30'21'34' East, aloft s CIS►t of ray ltee of safe KS1Mry. to the oortb lint of Said Covenessat Gat 11 tbance Worth 89'47'36" Vast, along soLd north Ilse. to tba point of betianinal tog•tber vlth any eldittoeal portion of said vacated soatbaast sot► street that aptaebso to the above described property NY operative of lar. { t.C. 07-A-02711 , 1% �XC1 TAX MT'iE0U►9ED I.s� is i':':.di wvs+oE Page 1 of 3 Loges D -l_....-. Dascz3ptzon: !ling,TWA Docum:ant-Year.Month.Day.Doo= 1978.1122.1071 Pago; 1 of Order: 1 Comment: LeaervLq unto the State or 4aebtestem, its saeceaeors or aaalgus, as auamact tar the operation, saintenence. racomstroctioe and inspection of a closed pipe drainage system to be tastelled by the grantee harata over, under, across said upon that portion of the sbovo described property lying +itbis a strip of land 20 feet in width, bstng 10 feet is width on each Olds of tbs fallovlug deserlbad center llaer Eaginsing it a point opposite US 11002+42.3 on Mid I -Line somy of said V131 al and 104.5 feat s utbsasterly therefron; tbarwo SwO. 66049'51' Vast, tbrou=h a point on acid =-Lice right or may lime opposite US 1 1400+23.0 on said I-Ltm astray and 36.5 feet southeasterly tberefeam, 250 feet to the cal of tbis center liar description, it being understood sad agreed tbat m petlaoast structure will be located on the above described easement preaises. The grantee herein, its successors os asatpne, sball beve no right of Ingress, and caress to, from and betwsn said Se 405 and the lands basis cosveyedi nor shall the grantee hsrete. its successors of assigns, he entitled to c— ft*atiam for my toss of iigbt, xiw and air ooessioaed by tbs location, construction, maintenance or ofersttos of said highwy; MICErt that said grantee, its VJCOeesore or awsigna, *ball have seasonable isgcess and agrees to, from and between the RAlUns rap as constructed at the northerly margin of said vacated Southeast 90th Street and the I - Line right of way soutbresterly of ■ line draw radially soutbsastetly from SIS Lik 11001+25 on said I -Lina survey. The specific detalts eowArsing all of rbleh may be found m sheet 6 of %bat certain plea entitled S9 405 (TSI No. 1). fsaton to Feanydals. sow of record and am file is the office of the Secretary of Trausportatios at Olympia, yashiaaton, bearing data of approval June 4, 1953. The lands bereia described are not regoicd for state higbway purr , and are conveyed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 79, Law of Mi, , Tirat I=troordim.ry Seamon. Doted at Olympia, Yasblilgton, thi+ day of 19 2L STATE 0r 9A 91I10100 Y. A. R%WT, Secrai i or Transportation I.C. 17-A-02311 rage 2 ox 3 rages Description: Kinq,WA Docvmant-Year.Month.Day.DooclD 1978.1122.1471 Page. 2 of Ordmx: 1 Comment: es Coasty of lharston ) On tW4 __ &_ day of y r. ►.r , 19_1F, before we pereoasllf anwared V. A. SULIAT. known to sa as the SeCratary Of ira9.lpOrtatfOe, Wasbisgton State Department of Stassportatios, and e=ecetad the forexafa instruieest, achnorled;lax sold wtru"At to be the tree mad •olentary act sod deed of tba State of WsOfingtoa, for the 0600 and prposa0 tharala stationed, and on oath stated that he is aathortad to *zwQta said L"trrsss. Giren under my Lend and offtefal peal the day end year last abase ■rittm. AFFIA9tD AS TO FORM: I •or ✓ i lit ' Notary Pablic is tba Stpta gy; of Washington. re, iag .t Xympts. istsmt Attorney Genera j UVINED AS TO f0 M3 OBy: - � ��+•y'�Q�Op A Abvda, ls*orpowated I � SUTI 4 WASHMM05 ) es Coasty of lharston ) On tW4 __ &_ day of y r. ►.r , 19_1F, before we pereoasllf anwared V. A. SULIAT. known to sa as the SeCratary Of ira9.lpOrtatfOe, Wasbisgton State Department of Stassportatios, and e=ecetad the forexafa instruieest, achnorled;lax sold wtru"At to be the tree mad •olentary act sod deed of tba State of WsOfingtoa, for the 0600 and prposa0 tharala stationed, and on oath stated that he is aathortad to *zwQta said L"trrsss. Giren under my Lend and offtefal peal the day end year last abase ■rittm. Page 3 of 3 ragas Description: Kinq,WA Document-lCaar.Month.Day.DoolD 1978.1122.2071 Page: 3 of Order: 1 Cent: t I Map* F •or 1iIQs"+'� Notary Pablic is tba Stpta of Washington. re, iag .t Xympts. � l i � ��+•y'�Q�Op A L.C. f7 -A-02311 Page 3 of 3 ragas Description: Kinq,WA Document-lCaar.Month.Day.DoolD 1978.1122.2071 Page: 3 of Order: 1 Cent: t I Map* F us t Zr f Q � :V a a 0 8 s� L$l for Rbmd-M-R quest el STATE OF WASFIINGTON d s DepdAnurit d Traicxrttpgr { W;3nref p in•v:1-ritn H�ildonq { O ympw Waihin mn %W4 1 . S Description: King,WA Document -Year, Month. Day, Doc TD 1978.1122.1071 Page: 4 of 4 _ Order: 1 Comment: �-a` -WAIS — — — - In the#t�`aUCr 0 :T State Highway No, 2*k* XmqftUUrtt4 ' KBOW ALL MEN 8Y THESE the Grantom Uoorgo Lathrop Colman tu.3 uoxita Y}t+she�il Ilp]svwlgt ko'b" and wife, , for aid in omutdomtion of the eu+n of !an WA W/1W $ 10400---1�Datlar,, - " -ana other raleabu actLdwimU is end paid, the receipt whereof is hkredy aektorutedped, hereby eomuaya. and warrants` to the Stale o Wcahi><gs�n, tha jotwwtap described real estate situated w County, to the Stas of Washitt im, to -rust' A31 t1A portico of a tract *f land to to hereinafter doearlbed; ]yiu9 and being ltarkworterly of a line dram paraii,el what tai dtaUnt of 36 foot scmuwatler�y wban maaaared at ri&t analea iu4/or radimlly from the aaatar lino eturq of tea. ErmME"PI eotmbatim Bots OR Sacondarr Sista Mg}arw W. 2 -As E�&iS Sheth; mid 28b.WfePet to a to Station h + 684 an- 6am-wetto the rfg2st with a -- 7hm ]ass'ednhetora setttinwA tract of lard is daeoribad am fo].latrsv That, pgrtion at tloreamont tat Olde Wi Section 32, Tai nsUv tis Rartho Seaga 5 Bast, . lyine Fest of the noir WdAting SacOb ry' State Righow XD. 2-,4 3ALE—ZeS TAX LIEN r � ri i The lands bedns herein car Vadt contain a total twee of 0.3 aea•as: rare or Ir�y the specific detalb coo cerning all of whish ars to be found tutthin that ccrtam tnap o) da!inue lorouon now of.rerord and on file to the offio Pj the Director of Highways at Olympia and heary+g date os air � pro=' Feb 7ths a revUed 91W51 < It is understood and agreed that the delivery of this decd is hardh tendc►eLi 4nd that the t-'-0 : and ob trent $ereof shall not become bindingu the State o Waahui ton tutlCas oral +.nt:t aa•C rted and approved hereon in smiting for the Stats oWashtivton, Aeparanent of N:tgiiu'agi, bl tie h`glu �tt of Way Etsptneer. t Dated AccepW and approutd r STATE OF WA$1i 30TCN - D or R=X%Vexa, M1N. I ri %f r 4,64 KiphtBjW Description: King, WA Deeds -Dodd 4210056 Pago: 1 of" Order: 2 Comment: a 'PW ? .I. " (TadMdUml aeAmowledc-nt got-) r, the lmdeigned, a notary pubitc in and for the State of Washl"gfOrn, hereby cent ftp that an this Zly appeared be 324 day Qj--'W� Xv­­ - for2 me knoin to be the trAtvidu4Lfi described m and w)&& executed the foregoing instrument, and ac- that_signed and sealed the Sal" as - th4r free and voluntary act and dead, for the =&0d purposes thmin 1jvp ander mV hand Wed Offinal setZt the day and y3ph31;7Dbovj w•n 4. Ilk, 4 _yj)jarV pubtic in and for the Stoic of imiukingion, 11c.,ttemng at StAi3acom, fCarponkl= 2dLnQL%VtC1dCMefJt krlfl) b ons day 01. before Tw personally appeaire� to Me k3LUM to lbw the of jAt6eoWatkvn that emoruted the foregoing instru t, and acknowledged said instrionent to ba the ftta and voluntary act and deed of said corpmhom. I Ike Uses and purposes therein "Wntioned and on oath irtated 'that— authorized mute ma instrument and that the seal 5#LreQTgjthFcQrP0rQt6 realof rout corporation Givea under iny !Land and offiddl seal the day and your last)bc, j wrtft" P Nplarl, Pub4t in and to* Ifi, 590L, 07 17f -tiding at 4 pp RECORDED (D VOL__ . ......... or PACE. - ST OF FE8 14 AN 11 26 ROBERT A. MORRIS AVOITOR - KING COUNTY WASH, DEPUTY 9 Descripticn: King,WA Deeds-Docid 4210056 Page: 2 of Order: 2 Ccmazent: f In the WMCr of S maadia7 State highway No. 2*A& gra Reith. KNOW ALL MEN BY TRESE MS81JTS; That the Grantoru George LalhrCp GmU= and Yaxgmaite VabaU 611mab hu -o" and vif@2 . for and in cmwWerm*m of the sum of ran and Ii0%3IJ0 IOi(f0••�-••• =- .......�.�oTlar,, - _ani otkwr vaimbU t!D!lel.QOreUms' �t dpaid, the nw4ript waherea f is hdrebg acknowledged, hereby conveys. ural w mT4ntt to the State o WashswWUnN tha follotntV described real estate sttuated m Simna the State of Washington, to -wast' County, l t partiaR of a treat of lard to be haredmatter deaoribed; 171fig and bean& Ncnrlk*eatarly of a line drum puzUdl with and diataut at 30 test 6ttttdteaaier4 wbxm soegtaared at Rett 4410* iuO/or radta34 Sim ttis aOOtm line of tea- Pwm aCanbc'k "Boa art 5acondar7 State i'•dgh.W so. 2.4, IMU742►r i em ` r ub ai 8 5 MVNV s eaOtafton 4 8�a an*- b5a.6t - to the rtglit with a The bwedpbefore xOntlow d tract ai lana is deeasibed as toXlvwrst _. rhat, pqrttan of Oo wmemt Tot brie Ms section 32i Tmmddp sit P.or`the Rap 5 Fast, . R. f_ x}ring Fast of the maw eedating secontaxy State RUbw ?M. 2-A• SALES) TAX LIEN r The laoda bedag t=ein wed Contain a total area of 0.3 9=09s =rC ar 1C"J Che apecifto details conceratsng all of which are to be found wttthm that certare map of deilnlfg iorncwon now of.reewd and on file tie the offietkof the !}tractor of Highways at Oigmpm and bearing date of ap' prowl Feb 7tttr 1950, seised 91W5L. 1 It is understood and agreed that the delivery of thu Beed u lierdbl tCnJl CJ Lind that the t••f yn$ and obligchmw herxaf shaU ngt become bindin upon the State o Waslein Lowe unless and ,.nal acrnpn,I and opprased herean m writing for the State of Washwmgton, Department of P13Wkwio. bw1 rig¢ h,gPu of Wap Enptrsaer. Dated thst.,.�T cine of ' xllss 1.92 Accepted and apptovtd this._ ay a1.:uscrll. STATE OP WASIMIGTO l - —..-DBp at>3zcriWAsts, `N.I r ff" h Deacript:ion• King WA Doody-DocSd 42IOQS6 Ba •' 1 of Order: 2 Co=ent: ---.. �_...-_ -- � � � x r ix" tie iiadlvibu6l at`anowlcdgaianrtorta) " . county 0 I. the axderaig+W, a notary public in and for the State of Waslrington. hereby certify that on thin 314 day 01- _ ..perso+wlly appeared brfor@ rest .. �� � teSd<t9 Hitctitt]�.. QR17lidt3. ... i . to me kwm to be glee list wWual..n described m and who. executed the foregoing instrument, and ac- ietoatedg� _jW ,..signed and seated the same aa_thelx free and voluntary art find deed, for ` glue t*tind parpom therein inenttartad. Mvp under my hand aitd o8irml seal the day and ye . bave w►a p. AI •� +� ; - molary Public In 6;Q for the State of Waahinolan, _- . t #'- ReradinP at .gtailSatluna 43 • ��cy.. 4 rCurpv>yttan asknni+kd�nrnt fturn� . ct4Nt " ss - Caani�l On thtL - _ day of_ before "m personally appearelt r to me krwmn to be the' and of lheempgratimr that emeeutod the foregoing instru t, and acknowledged said irisimment to be the No and voluntary act and deed of said corperatton, f he uses and purposes therein mentioned and an oath rtated'that— authorized t cute sand instrument and that the scat a fixed a thFcarpamte reatpf said corporat wn. - Given under +mij Baird and official seal the day and year iast�tr, a lrrtrren Notart, Publtr to a4d for the Sta,. J, iYWO-fty.On � BrsldinP n! a h , f - NJ z A.- I Cn p o, � llt<�cRnEa s vel .................... .... of E O31 PACE. ...ii.';.RFQt1£ST OF n! FEB 14 AM 11 26 l y l E4 Re$H N4 COUNTYI WASH ` I - .� DEPbTy IL Description: K.iaq,WA Deeds-Docld 4210056 Page: 2 of 2 Oxda+x: 2 Caaaaaaxit: � III TU Mt= Or U 495 038 b. 1), Itntoa to [eaeydal■ (Kiane■ Right of liay). MW AU go gT TMI P8EST71TS, that the STATE 0R WASAIRCM, for mad in roaslderation of SVO TDWSM. SUN MMI; D, rlrff "M #0/140 (42.750.00) OOLLAIs hareby conveys ani quitclaim@ unto PAW-ASMS. IKCOarOKATEL, h s Vashiegtom corporation, all its rigit, title mt tnterast, to Md to O the follaving dercribsd real property spatted in King County, State of PM --• Vashln$001 UD rm" portion of c vernmut Lot 1, Section 32, Tovaebip 24 North, tang* 5 East, V.K., end of Goverememt Lot 5, Section 29. said Tovnehip sad Kang*, described as falloevr 9e;inniag at a point sa the aorto line of said Coveraaent Lot I North $$147136* Peat 797.2 fest, note or less, from the mortbeast Cotner thereof. said point being at Ugbvay tmsinear's 3tottol {hareiaafter referred to er W31 4*65.6 on the Temporary Conneetlon wrvoy of State 1lsbwey mate 11o. 405 (Six We. 2-A), Kemaydals forth, the specific details Comrermiag all of which may be fs*si OR ,beet 1 of the plan thereof sou of record ad OR file is the office Of the Seeretery of Trasportstioo at Olympia, Virhio¢toe. luring date of approval yebreary 7, 1950; thanes South 01112'24' WatC 30 feet to the southerly margin of vtested Southeast 80th Street at the point of cern of a curve to the left, the radial canter of vbieh bear@ south 01'12124" West 256,5 fest; tloesea easterly sad southwesterly. parallel with eatd raporary Csweactice survey. to interaeet tLe I -Lias right of way lire of state 111sbvay Ioote 110. 445, Kenton to 1:ennydal@1 tbssce morthaastetiy. elo% @aid I -Line right of my lin@. losing a cares to the richt having a radial of 1115.92 feet to latereact tl-e M-LiSO right of way 1100 of said llig3wy at it pout 50 feet soatbaasterly. %be* measured radially. from said ;Lina survey led at a point 417.5$ feet we'theastor17. visa measured along said I -Line Tight of ray lima, from a point opposite RES 1998+05.94 tad South 54002460 Kest 30 feat thrrafrom) these* South 32959147' r4at. along said UAL" rtabt of vay 1110, 11.60 foot to the point of tete of a curve to the left havias a rd tar of 180 feat; tbanca eontiamisg on acid U-i"Us right of way line. aloe laid curve, am are diataoes of 68.23 feat to ihs point of turn of r curve to the malt havima a radios of 120 9001 thaws cuatinuisg on said U -Line risbt of ray ILA*, al.ws said CITY*. as are distaace of 0.80 fast to the northerly Bantu of said vacated southeast 80th 8trasri thsnoa south 88'41'76* Lent 70.46 feet along aid northarl7 marsla. being also a right of vay line of acid Iigbvay; theme* Sostb 30'21134' East, along a rigit of say live of said Mahvay, to tie eortb Ila@ of said Oovennat hat 11 thsace North 88147136' Wast. aieo8 said merth It". to the Wet of %aginningi together with my additiats) portio@ of said vacated louthetst 80th street that artacbas to the above described property by *"VatLom of 1@v, T.C. f7 -A-02311 1% �NCIty! jtx MT'iFRU►IED I:s g L'1. i:,'.. ia; 4iVd+oB rag. 1 or 1 r.aq t - Descriptian: 'rang,71'A Document -Year. Month. Day.DoclD 1978. 1122. 1071 Page: 1 of Order: 2 Comment: lsserviog woto the State of W40114011. its OUCCeeenrs or 441611106, as easement for the operation, matatonance. recoaetrection and taspeailoa of a closed pipe dramas■ sy@t@s to U fastellsd by the grantee harem ovaT, %oder, seroem and upon tbat portion of the above described property trial within a atrtp of land 20 feet to width. being t0 feat in wddth oo each ride of the following described terata: lines logLemtag at a point opposite Us 11002+42.3 os said 1 -Use surrey of sets Hisbaaz and 109.5 feet southeasterly therefrom,, tbsnu So%tE 66946151 West, through a point on said I -Liss right of res line opposite 03 11000+23.0 ou said I -List survey end 36.5 fest southeasterly tbararrom. 250 het to the ead of this center line description, it being understood and agreed that so pernan"t structure will be located on the above described sasewnt ,irises. The grantee herein, its soccessore or urians, shall have so rtht Of inlresm and *Stets to, from and between said R 405 end the lands berets c*w ersdi nor shall the grant** hereta, its successors or 6@612116, Ise entitled to compensation for any toss of 118it, view and air occasioned by the location, eouetraetiom, ■atntsssaes or oNYretiora Of said hisbusyi MCEPf that amid grantee, its sueceesore or "*4p t, sball tufa reasossble iogra s and agrese to, from and batwmso the RA-Une romp se coantructed at the northerly margin of said vacated gosthasst g0th Street @ad the I- lia* HEM of my southvesterly of a lice drawn radially southasatarly from U9 Lik 11001+25 on said i Ltae survey. The apsctfic details eosomtsitg all of rhicb may be found on @hest 6 of that certain pian antitlad SI 405 (7311 No. 1), 7satoo to 18=7481a. sow of record std au file in the office of the Secretary of Transportation at Olympia, Washiogtoa. bearing data of approval Juan 4, 1963. The lands herein described ore not req%ir@d for State b1Sbv*y port i and are tooveysd purem"t to the prarisiou of Chart*r 78, Law of 1977. 71rst E:traoadlm:ry Sa6s106. Dated at Olympia. VashinStoo, this day of AL --,A, . 19't. STATE OF VASS INGT Oft W. A. IMM, Secretly of aneportatto11 I.C. 07-A-02311 pate 2 of 3 tales Description: King,WA DOCtmmant-Year.Month.Day.DoalD 1978.1122.1071 Page; 2 of Order: I Conmmen t: s•1 APPIbDnD As TO FM% gy;Affia iz istaac ttrrwy Geserr RIVIi4ID AS TO TM N � t, Iaeorpout d3 i i� SSATs C# VAUDMOK ) 1 C VJIty of lLantoa ) on tbia -A—day of •==A= , 19_g before ae perw—IIY *"*&red V. A. SU=Y. knora to sa r the secretary of Traoaportatfon. Yss6lnston State Dspsrtaeat of Ttassportatioa, and swKsted the foregoing iontrvest, aeknovladglag mid fastn.nant to M the Ires and voluntary act and deed of the state of Vaskirstos, for the ones and perposas tbaroin aunties". and on oath atstd that he is aathariaad to at•aate said Imtrrest. Givae under wy Land sod official seal the day and Year last abv.s wrtttea. I.C. t7 -A--02711 Ilse 3 of i Page■ Doacsiption. King,WA Doa=vnt-Year, Month. Day. DocTD 1978.1122.1071 Order: 1 Count: F ���Il fry SGGaTY Publtcin! for the Mate IF; � Of Yashingtoo. sting •t Ilyaple. it *s .10 an y' r ao}`+•4 I.C. t7 -A--02711 Ilse 3 of i Page■ Doacsiption. King,WA Doa=vnt-Year, Month. Day. DocTD 1978.1122.1071 Order: 1 Count: F Order: I C3 Cq C30 -4 1 CQ I ILEP for Rbmd-M-Rmuest cl 7 8; �.f. STATE OF WASHINGTON L va a DepaAncrit of Tr,:--s--,rtv on Land % 11,2hvv7 hhr,-wi.-i-cion B,,clerq OlYMPUL W%F'MrXr�M %5A King"NA Docum*nt-YQ&x.mbnth.Day.DocXZ) 1978,1122.10ZL 71 g o: Pa M., ial� CcsmmAont. — — -�Awm-w Q O Ci }�} uj W ILE O.c O I- a l'v '1 vi E L a N 0 'o , b L a ts c j w O v as _ m oro-� w E 0 0 w nE o 6 a o all a L � H } d Q a Z U CLO O o � Z C I - i J W I 1 / I LU I - U + 00 ` s b }, U +-� a U \ r 0 4 rn v '0 IL w s ��- F N ffl d •r o t I riy- -, "n w� X79 ����97 LZ - �- {a W :r:... . _ FEG'�.ST OP c � �• � � � TA7i°LIF�N Ix7 VEC 6 M 4 0 j I- _ \4 S A f ]b _ � � I o �• f 1'O • .y W e•� Tr'f! Pon. 1 9; Statutory Warranty Deed THi ► tti t +K UARGURR1TE COLMAN , also "own as MARGARET C01 ;t,1%, a M1. ---TEN DOLLARS and other valuable con..,if-r.lt,ons PAN-AnooE , l NC , That portion 01 Government lot 1, seertun 32, tosrnsnil Z4 north, range 5 east, T{,b4, , sn King CottntN , 11AFhingtun. Iy1ng south of the south line of 5uuthdauE :sixth street 4nd *Qutheasterly and Southerly of the southeasterl} line at I.alse Irdshtngton Boulevard and of that certain parcul of land heretofore conveyed to the State ni %aa:h- InGtun, by need recorded under auli tor's filo No. 4210056. to the County of F -ng. 9tatj of nashington and lying wrnrterly Of 1.110 west latae of Secondary State ?Highway No. 2-; as des- cribed to deeds recorded under auditor's file No, 46642.32, and lying northeasterly of the lane described as follows EL0910ning at ;a Point an the east line of said Government lot 1 from Which point the northeast corner of Said lot 4ears north 1642113" east at a distance of 986.85 feet, thence north 62"5915" west 1290.2$ feet to the southeasterly line Of Lake Washington Boulevard. k ZM J toted Ihl► 40,elt • g,� 1% day ..a December, 1957. -'r1l1 OF. H A191%1:1!4%. I sf „nly of K I N G i aw �7ilin tL1 ! %tAI 1 {1„ Ihlf der (Mfwn�lir a�1x� rtl LrL.rr me MOIJERITZ coL mAM, also known am MARGAR19T COLNU, a widow, la m. known Ito be Ille 11..1VAI'ra <igcrdKd In lend whn a%muted the wilbla and InNgaing hutrumel,t, and ;{kliefsT t tiles She ngned thr lame as her No a.ld voluntary act and decd, for the t1ltr4rin mentioned y s'�, •}� 21 "N my hand and a9kld veal Ihll day o Deaedtben 1957 al •Y ��'t� L��� % _ %dfary PuNfi IA Peri MF 1,j+ Slate of W4141i1i11e11, r�::S7pI ygfw nrrrtrr,r of Senttle Description: Kingr,NA Deeds-Docid 4856255 Page: I of I Order: 2 Ccw=ent: — _WARRANr"AMD - - - - • In thaedter of Sw*3k%W State 1f'9h'm4;1 Na, 2*4 XmWdOU is ' KBOW ALL rdEN By THESE PRZSEIJrS,- Xhat the Grant* = rjearlSe j4tbr" C oltsall 14tahign ftUmsm basWgid and wifaj for and in on6doution of OW sum of Tom and NO/= $ Inj00--_' spa other vaimbLe a omidemiA cm paK *q rempt w?wzof to hereby reby deknowledged, hereby CmuqVand warrants to the Stage 11 Washbtgton, W jollouAng described real estate situated in the s" of Washington, to -wit, porUgg *f a ti:j� of Ian& to be hardmftew dasortb�j ITW and -osirg xw+,bswtwiT at a lim dran pardUel with and dist4at atter f "t sauthsaster]�, When mmm=ee at right aqAis W/or raft%Uy from the amts: lime ne trm. POT "botion Board an Sana State X&F-W W. 2 -AN Lmqftu $ ad t= MIPW eta Station 7 - 611.0 cm u aures to tbo riot with a 7t na 286, feet +0 HigbWa Hqr1=*r' a atati= 4 +v -55.6t -- The hWdrbefa" ZCrUoRdd tract of 28Xd ie MCC, Od M IOLIAMOt %uat parti" at Gavommt lot One O*j DeCtUm 32s Tc=xbiV 2h HoMs Imp 5 Eat, lying Fast of the Ww eadAtIM SWOO&KX7 State Higbow $O- 2-A- S-ALTE__'zS TAX LIEN 431, The Isalm W4 bareLn omweyed contain a Utzl area of 0.3 Der"., =rc 'r L"432 the sperift detalls concerning all of whish are to be found tutthtn that certain M[CP of cvinitc iomflon now of.record and an Ale rn the office of tho Director of lAghtvalls ar Olympa and bezriAg date 01 up - prowl Feb 7+.h, 3950, reviped 9IW5X. I It is understood and agreed that the MOM of thus deed ;a hcreb!l tQndMJ Old t"' thr g. -t T.nj and g1vt obtione hereof shall n9t become binding upon the State of Waskingtolt unftsv and uliltl aCLTPrvj . and 4pr*ligaved hereon in writing for the Stata fWashvTton, Departmicut of MOWJVI, b,1'R of Way VnVirwor. 4 Dated of_ J&A.J.952 Axcn)WW mapprmd of. STAT9 OP WASM14MMN LA -D ar M121WAT3, . . . ..... ............... .. Doscript.iarz. Xing, Deeds-DacTd 4210056 Page. I of Ord&r., 2 Co=ent. (tadlvidual acknowledt;atent farm)County 01 --mg a notary public in and for the State of Washinptm hereby certlh that on this f, that tt>,derssq+tedr _ 34 day of %D!.persaizally appeared before tate QCOX6� 11si`lsStd3. il3teti�ll. 40 - c to viekr mm td be the lndtuddual~.a described m and who- executed the foregoing tnstrument, atzd a kttolnlsdgedsh _,signed and sealed the same as_tbtx frer and voluntary act and deed, for Vie s 0d td purposes therein na moaned. a;zsp1 uxder my lutRd and officrat sent ilia day and ye a �r - ;`�ti•: .� .NOtary F4DIIC 1. sad for she Starc of Wwhtnptmtr lteitding at stai2aLe=' fi �' �rrt =a fey talion Izammvledgmmt form) ' •' as `� on this day of. before me perrsonatly appearelt to me known to be the a and of the coWamtm that xecuted the foregmng :nstrn t, and acknowledged said instrltment to be the _ jree and. voluntary act and deed of said corpmoon, f he usee and purposes therein mentioned and an oath stawd'tha — nuthtmzed t C=te said instrument and that the scat wised u iittrcorporats seatof said corporatton. Gibes under my hand and vfiictal seat tate dayand gear last bol : wrirfen M Naiare Pub Lic m and for tier 51137. a1 Wa3 —1044 Reslduto tit -i r kt 1 e Q � RECORDED tU ! PA E..... -+, •_'.Rf4t]EST OF gxy��11tt , FEB 14 AM 11 26 • H ROPERT A. MORRIS AUDKOR r KIND CDOHtY SMASH, p z i �I �_.{IEPUTY ~ Description: Hing,WA Deeds-Docid 4210056 Page: 2 of ai Order: 2 Co=ent: w M Naiare Pub Lic m and for tier 51137. a1 Wa3 —1044 Reslduto tit -i r kt 1 e Q � RECORDED tU ! PA E..... -+, •_'.Rf4t]EST OF gxy��11tt , FEB 14 AM 11 26 • H ROPERT A. MORRIS AUDKOR r KIND CDOHtY SMASH, p z i �I �_.{IEPUTY ~ Description: Hing,WA Deeds-Docid 4210056 Page: 2 of ai Order: 2 Co=ent: 251T CLA1K illi! III rdX MATItlt 01 SK 405 ME lb- 1) , ;stoma to COM74416 (Emote tight of Yat). MM AIL No ET TWSE NtSEMT3, that the STATE Or VASKDKM, for and la consideration of IVO 7110O AMD, SIM KMIRD, ElErr AID 110/100 ($2,750.00) DOLLAU hereby catwaya ad quitclaims unto rAiMAA=. B000 OEATID, a Yasbirstoo corporation. all.its r19%t, title W lateroat, is omni to the folloviug described real property seturted It S1e9 County. State of we sting ton: Those portions of C+rrer4unt Int 1, Section 32, Invanhip 24 North. Kansa S goat, Y.M., and of Cavermaent Lot S. Section 29. said Township and Image. described a• follow t lejinsins at a polar on the north line of said Coveremeat Lot 1 Mortb 66'47136' vast 791.2 feet, mor• or loan, fro& the northeast corner thereof, saw polst bei25 at 11igbway 6lsinsa's Station (baraisaftet 90ferred to AS US) 4+63.6 On the Temporary CoonsctioW survsy of Stat* Iighrsy Este Ila. 405 (9111 Ib. 2-A), 10=914416 Yortb, the specific details costereias 811 Of 169th say b* foasS om sheet 1 of the plan thereof sort of record mW en file in the office of the wrotary of Traasportstive at Olympia. vashisgto2. kering date of approTel Eebrusry 7. 19501 thence South 01'12'246 VW 30 feet to the southerly margin of ♦stated 6oatbsast SOth Street at the paint of calve of a esrve to the left. Elie radial canter of Which burs South 01'1:1240 vest 256.3 feet, t%*wA weaterly sad oaatbfsstarly, parallel with said Temporary Casnsction survey. to latetaect tlw I -Line riglt of my line of State Kighray 10Vt6 &- 405. baton to Konaydale; thence northeasterly, ale% said I -Line rtsbt of my line. !aims a carts to the right having a radius of 1115.92 fact to intsrwet its EA -Liss riatt of toy IIAG of acid Ktgbray at a point 50 toot southeasterly, fbem measured radially, from said 1-11me survey and at a point ;37.36 feet MWtUmserly. vti■a wAsored &tons said E -Lina right of fay line. from ■ point opposite US E 499+05.94 and South 59002116* East 3D fest therefrom; #bonen Swth 320571470 Last, along said EA -Lint visit of vay lint, 11.60 foot to the point of carve of 4 cons to the left bsvias a radius of ISO fast; thtoce coatinubg 04 said EA -Lime richt of Way line, slo=t said carve, as are distance of 68.23 feet to the point of carve of s curve to the rigbt having a radios of 120 fast; thsnct eoalinning an said WLi2e right of ray line, alms Nati curve, an are distmica of 12.60 foot to the sortbarly margin of raid vacated Sontheaat both Streoti tbsace South 68'471366 bast 70.46 feet along said wrtbsrly margin. bai=t also ■ right of Tay line of said Sighrsy; tbosos South 30421'546 East. oloog a ti=lt of my lime of said lisbasy, to tin north 1124 of said Cowtramemt Lot 1; tbeace Mortb 689471366 West. aloap said mertt time. to the point Of boglaaims; together with may additional portion of sed Twated Southeast 60th Street that attaches to the above Afferised property ly operation of law. I.C. f7 -A-02711 I% okcZ� TeX !`.917 tE0Uti1ED page I of I rages -, Description: Kinq,WA Document -Year. Month. D4y.Doc2D 1978.1122.1071 Page. 1 of Order: 3 Coen t : Leservimg unto the State of Waabiytos, its asecessors or assigns, as easement for the operation, maintenance, reconstreettos and imspectlam of a closed pipe drainage system to be installed by the grantee breis over, under. across end upon that portion of the above deecrtbed property lying vithin a strip of I&W 20 fall is vidth, being 10 fast to width an seeb aid* a1 the following described tester lines geglaalag at a point opposite W 11002x42.3 so said I -List survey of said Wghwal and 104.5 feet a0utbeastorly tberefrom; thence $OoO.. 66'48'51" Best. through a point on Said I Lias rigbt of way line opposite SIS 11000*23.0 on sold I-Liea merxay and 36.S feet somtheaaterly therefrom, 230 feet to the and of this center line description, It being understood and agreed that no permanent structure will be located on the abowa described easement promisee. The grantee barsin, its successors or assitns, shall haws mo Tight of sngresa and egress to, from and between said SK 405 and the laude herein conveyed; %or shall the grantee Across, Its successors or assigns, be entitled to campensattoo for my tons of light. vier and air occasianad by the location, tonatevetica. maintenance or operation of said highway; L[CI]pF that said Weston. its sueeaseors or &@signs, shall have reasonable ingress and egress to. from sad between the &A -Uma rasp of ewtrueted at the northerly margin of said vacated Southeast 80th Street and the I - Lina right of way southvsst*rly of a line drawn r&dia117 aoutbeasterly from 91S LjA 11001+25 on said I -Lice surrey. The specific details comceroisg all of which may be Fouad 00 sheet 6 of that eertalz plea entitled St 405 (PSR No. 1), Mantua to [ennydale, sem of record and On file in the office of the Secretary of Transportation at Olympia, Yeshisgton, beating date of approval ion 4, 1963. The leads herein described ars not required for State highway purr , and are comvoyod puremaat to the provisions of Chapter 76. laws of 1977, Meat Rztrsordia:ty Session. Doted at Olyspi&, Wasbingtom, this day of v+✓ 14o2v. S T A T 1 0 f V A 5 1 1 9 6 1 0 w. A. May. Secret y of TYcmaportatiom I.C. /7•A-02311 Y440 2 os 3 ]pages Description: King,WA Doc=ent-Year.Month.Day.DociD 197$.1122.1071 Page: 2 of Order: 1 Cc gent: y -i APMV a as TO 7M, si: Ai4istaot bttornel Genera REVIEWED AS TO FM: O i 1] i nl �6ode, Yneorpasao t70 I � SUTE w WAIRDicros ) I ss County of iberetoa ) on tM. _L4 _dq of , 19' , before ac pernoaallf appeared V. A. DaUIL, know to as w the See -rotary of Traeaportatioa, Yaebugton stat& Departseat of Transportation, 0sd awwsted as forasoias Lastrueest, acknovledsitg said iastrYaeat to be tbs frog and eolsatary act and dead of the State of ilasllnstoe, for tbs 0004 &ad Is- a" tbareis amtloned. asd on oatb slated that ba is autbortwl to anaoats said inattusest. Given under my bead and official seal the day and year last &bore written. Page 3 of 7 Papa Description: Kinq,WA Document-year.Month.Day.DOCM 1978. Ozder: I Comment. Payer 3 of ■ r� F I lio-urf Public 1A fat tba state L 111gi` � �r4 s Of Y&ebia=tos. r idias ,t 'liyspia. $4' 46E I.C. V-4107311 Page 3 of 7 Papa Description: Kinq,WA Document-year.Month.Day.DOCM 1978. Ozder: I Comment. Payer 3 of ■ r� F I C> 11 fm R c ." 5;:1 i I; Al O FA, y 7 W E I ILEP for Rbmd-M-Request of U'v SrATE OF WASHINGTON Dcpl&Mncijt A Trr--jp,,rjj-on 'k, 4 Lam Dr.vj�;" W-twil A vim &aW,rn OYII%PM WIJO?V�,On %W4 L Description: King, WA Document-Yeam.manth.Day.DocID 1978.1122.1071 Page., 4 of 4 74OPEOW Order: I Coment: gv_iT CLAIM RME IN THL HATTL Of 51 495 (PSH Nin. 1), lsatoa to Kemoydals (Kacess Right of Vey). Flow AU xEK sT TME9L PRISLMTS, that the STATE OF VURDICTUN, for Red in Coaaidsration of 1110 THOUSAND, SVU ROM SED, F1FTT A" 110/1D0 (=2.750.00) OOLLAIS bereby convoys and quitclaims unto FAN-Ag00i. M=PDRATEA, 1 a Washington corporation. all. its right, title a& interest, in and to the follavIn5 described real properti alt4eted in King [Dainty, State of Vasbingtooa Ilnam purtLoas of Garer seat Lot 1, Section 32, Tavaehip 24 Mortb, gangs 3 Emet, V.K., all Of C4wsr4mant Lot 5, Seattom 2!. said Township aid lacge, described as fallow? Negiaming at a point oo the worth line of said Ooveremmat Lot 1 Mbrtb 45'47'35' Vest 797.2 fast, lora Or 1404, ITO* tbs nartbeeet Corner tbereof, said polat WAS at Ugbwy Lgineer's StetlOs (hereinafter referred to as MS3) 4+55.6 on the temporary CoanaetIOG survey or stats Nigbway costa No. 403 (451 lb. 2d). KOMORI* North, the specifie details COUC0001M ail of which may ha foams on sheet 1 of the plan thereof now of record and oo file tie the office of the Secretary of Trmaaportottoo at Olympia, i7eattogtoa. fearing date of approval February 7, 1950; tbeaes South 01012124' Yana: 30 feet to the southerly margin of vacated Southeast 60th Street at the paint of Carve of a curve to the left, iiia radial center of wfiteh bears South 01412124" west 256.5 fast; ebcnea vaaterly and ea+thwsatorly. parallel eitb a4td Temporary Cossection survey. to isteysect tLe I -Line right of +gay line of State Nijhra7 loot. lb. 405, penton to Kaeeydelel them" aortbsaat+rly, along said I-Liue richt of way 11as. belag a Carve to the rigbt bevue a radial or 1115.92 fact to Intersect tle to -Line right of ray line of sstd Rtghway at a point 50 foot sautbeasterly, wh" maasorsd rai14117, from s41d I -Lion survey and at a point 437.35 fast northeasterly, rata* measured along said i -Lima right of ray 11". from a point opposite MES N. 998+05.94 sad Soath 59'02115• Last 30 feet therefrom; theucs Soutb 32059'47" test, 410% aid L-Ltaa right of wy line, 11.40 feet to the point of ratio of a carve to the left bavieg a radius of 190 fast; thence cootinaisg am amid sA-Ltaa tight of way Item, along amid CILLWO, as RTC distance Of 65.21 feet to the pniat Of Cane of a curve to the right having a rediae of 120 [oats tlk@wA continuing an *&IA NA -Lias right Of way lime. shag Said curve, so are distance of A2.g0 fast to tbs northerly merata of add vacated southeast 901h Strestt tbeuce South 45647'35' Last 7D.46 feet along said northerly morats, baiag also a right of way line of avid Highway; themes South 30'=1'54' Leat, al sag a right of ray line of said XSknmy, to tin aottb It" of said Covare•ast Lot 11 thence lbrth 83'47136" Vase, aim* said earth line, to the point of beginaiMai together with any additional portla. of said vacated 504theast gotb Street that attach" to the above, described property Ny Operation of law. I.C. #7-A-02111 i 1:0 �hClb"• TAK P'n-T lEo u%IED page 1 of 3 pages // , OIL* Description. YIng,WA Document -Year. Month. Day.DoclD 1978.1122.1071 Page: 1 of 4 Order: .1 Comment: Resetving unto the State of Vaahiegtoo, its sueeeeaota or aaaigss, its aasesent for the operation, astatemawa, t«onstruction and inspection of a closed pipe draisage systom to be installed by the grantee berets ovar, under, across and upon that portion of the stare dewrlbW property lying within a strtp of lend 20 fast to vidth, Was W foot to width on each olds of the following described tester haat gegtemiaa at a point opposite FM 1 1002+41.3 on said I -kine survey of said W4bwL) and 109.5 feet soattaasterly therefrom. tbaoee 3=0.. 66'46'31 heat, through a polst on said I -Liao right of ray line opposite 013 1 1000+23.0 ou said I -Liao serway and 36.3 Etat southeasterly IharafrVs, 250 feet to the sad of ibis center line description, it belag aaderstood and agreed that so petawaeat structure will be located on the above deacrihsd eawn mt promisee. The grantee herein, its successors or asstlas, shall have no right of ingress. and agrees to, from and beteaom said St 405 and the lands "rain cowayedi nor shill the grantee berets, its eaeelsear■ or nsigon, be entitled to cospousatiee for my loss of digit, viav and sit occasioned by VYA locattoo, construction, satatenaace or operation of said highway; EICEpT that sold Santee, its rumessots or assigns, shall have reseoosbla Ingress and egress to, from and between the ltl�Uma romp as constructed at the northerly margin of said vacated Southeast 60th Most *Md the i - Lina right of soy soutltvestarly of ■ line draw radially southeasterly from HES Lfs.1 1001+25 on said I -Line survey. The specific details eoacwrsisg all of which may be found 0e §hast 6 of that certain plan entitled St 405 (7511 So. 1), Union to [aumydale, eat of record and on file in the office of the Sacrstary of Transportation at Olyspia, Vosbiagtoa, hearing data of approval Jaw 4. 1953. The lands herein dasertbed are not required for State highway pure i maid are conveyed pursaawt to the provisions of Chapter 78, taw of 1977, :fret Estraordfs_ry Session. Dated at Myopia, Vashiagtoo, this 1 Tday of 10+04-6Ae✓ it 2L. STATE Or W A S N I ■GTO ■ v. A. gtplsY, Sstret y of Timasportatios I.C. I1 -A-02311 Page 2 os 3 !sass Description: King,WA Document-Year.Mvnth.Day.P_oclD 1976.1122.1071 Page. 2 of Order: I Comment-, ATPE04f,!! AS TO I=, gy; r 1 71 AsbLetant Attorney Genera EEYILYEO As To FMI O Ny: [' _ ty A3odc, Iacorparate Qb r iSTATE or vA8USMON ) S so Couety of Thareton as thty^ lL d&y of • , 19�% baeore ae pereoaallr appeared V. A. SUUIf. Imb" to se as the Secretary of ltwaportatioe, 4aebingtaa Etats Dapartnent of TYaaaportation, and axeested the foregoing ioetrment. "Imawledgt„g said 1latron"t to be the free end TO162taTY act and dead of the State of Ws"toa, for the eaea and rorpaeee therals motion". and oa oath "tod that ha is autbortaed to execute saw laatruaast. Given voder wT head and ofetcial seal the day and year list aWTO written. of YaahSnNtoa, r441dingfor Ft 11yrpla. $a+,dL ;N. j* t V•S,o% I.C. i7 -A-9"711 Inge S of ] raps ,,) ascription: King,WA Document -Year . Mon th-Day.DocYD 1978.1122.1071 Pager 3 of Order., 1 Comment. R L t' { t i I F f v w x w V r! r1 ti a b d ° 5 4 �? for Rbaetci*-ftuest U1 ' STATE OF WASMNGTON *t -s a ��__JJ cl �M�MJI 4T tfd�l.} rh i�OfY G -e j4J Land L4 AT_flG jf'�'"F.1 GY'.l:�11 K.-,•hwi7 f. i t ii t yion B c rq I � .h C(Vntaa Wea rVon 98504 Description: King,WA Document-Year.Month.Day.DocXD 1978.1122.1071 Payer 4 of _ Order: 1 Camment: a_,: CITY OF RENTON c!#- Y of Pent g L)ivlslon w# Lake Washington Boulevard. lD) 00 Ili'* T T - 401 'ALL Zl Hy�drologicMydraulic Analysis APRIL 2010 Gray & Osbome #09583 C3, -my a-, (Daborwxe, Lmc- CENSUI-TING EA--,1NE-F-R'S Lake Washington Blvd Hawks Landing Hydrologic/Hydraulic Analysis Table of Contents Introduction.......................................................................................................1 HydrologicModeling ............................................... ..............................1 Hydrologic Modeling Components..............................................................1 BasinDelineation..................................................................................1 Hydrologic Modeling Assumptions.......................................................2 Hydrologic Modeling Results.. ..................................................................... 4 Detention Requirements..............................................................................5 HydraulicModeling...........................................................................................6 Hydraulic Modeling Components................................................................6 Hydraulic Modeling Scenarios.....................................................................7 Hydraulic Modeling Results.........................................................................8 WaterQuality..................................................................................................10 Water Quality Modeling Components.......................................................10 Water Quality Treatment Facility Alternatives...........................................11 Biofiltration Swale................................................................................11 Wetva u lt......................................... . .....................................................12 StormFilter...........................................................................................12 1=ilterra..................................................................................................13 RainGarden........................................................................................13 Additional Water Quality Treatment Facilities....................................14 Treatment Facility Costs............................................................................14 GRAY & OSBORNE, INC I APRIL 13, 2010 Recommendations ........................................... ......15 GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. 11 APRIL 13, 2010 Lake Washington Blind Hawks Landing HydrologidHydraulic Analysis List of Tables Table 1 — Basin Land Use Coverages..........................................3 Table 2 — Model Area Inputs Based Upon Land Use Coverage.3 Table 3 — Peak Flows for the 2 through 100 -Year Storms ..........5 Table 4 — Threshold Discharge Area Inputs Based Upon Land Use Coverage................................................................5 Table 5 — Peak Flows for the 2 through 100 -Year Storms for the Threshold Discharge Area..........................................6 Table 6 — Modeling Results for Existing Conditions .....................9 Table 7 — Modeling Results under Future Conditions..................9 Table 8 — Freeboard Results.......................................................10 Table 9 —Water Quality Related Impervious Area.....................11 Table 10 — Rain Garden Plants...................................................14 Table 11 — Water Quality Treatment Facility Costs ...................15 List of Figures Atter Page Figure1 —Vicinity Map................................................................................2 Figure 2 — Basin Map and Existing Land Use............................................2 Figure 3 — Future Land Use ....................................... •.. ........................2 Figure 4 - Model Input Map.........................................................................4 Figure 5 — Recommended Treatment Altemative....................................15 GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. 111111 APRIL 13, 2010 Lake Washington Blind Hawks Landing Hydrologic/Hydraulic Analysis List of Appendices Appendix A — Basin Figure from the Environmental Assessment for the 1405/NE 40 St. Interchange Project Appendix B - Soil Map from USDA Appendix C— 1995 FEMA King County Flood Insurance Study Information Appendix D — KCRTS Input and Output Files Appendix E — Digital XP-SWMM Modeling Files GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. IN APRIL 13, 2010 Lake Washington Blind Hawks Landing Storm and Water Improlvlement Project Hydrologic/Hydraulic Analysis The project is located along Lake Washington Blvd. North, west of 1-405 near the vicinity of Exit 7 (see Figure 1). The major storm drainage system in this area consists of a depression located just north of the proposed Hawk's Landing development site which collects runoff from 1-405. From this depression, a 24" pipe conveys stormwater to a ditch along the east side of Lake Washington Blvd North. The ditch continues for approximately 500 LF to an existing 24 -inch pipe that discharges directly into May Creek, approximately 1,100 feet upstream of the creek's discharge into Lake Washington. The City of Renton has been provided funding to complete the curb, gutter, and sidewalk along the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. North in this vicinity. The following analysis of the drainage system within this area includes the hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of both the existing and future land use scenarios. It also includes the preliminary design of the pipe alignment which will accommodate both revisions to the road and future development within the area. An analysis of water quality treatment alternatives is presented as well. Hydrologic Modeling Components Basin Delineation The first step in hydrologic modeling involves delineation of the drainage basins for the project area. The Hawk's Landing area was partially delineated in the January 2001 Draft Environmental Assessment Discipline Reports for the I- 405/NE 44th Street Interchange Project. (Associated Earth Sciences, January 2001, See Appendix A). This figure was used to assist with delineating the "Eastern 1-405 Basin". This basin collects runoff from the northbound lanes of 1- 405 and NE 44th St. The "Western 1405 Basin" encompasses runoff from the proposed Hawk's Landing development and runoff from Lake Wa. Blvd. N. Land use for the basins was obtained from an existing Bush Roed Hitchings survey and the proposed development plans for Hawk's Landing as provided by Sound Development Group. APRIL 13, 2010 0 150 300 600 Feet 1W i Project Location F. M�-'Am CITY OF RENTON Lake Wa. Blvd, Hawk's Landing Storm and Water Improvements Project Figure 1 Vicinity Map Cl"f.-y CONSULTING ENGINEERS The Eastern 1-405 drainage basin encompasses approximately 7.6 acres whereas the Western 1-405 drainage basin encompasses approximately 7.6 acres as well. Figures 2 and 3 depict the location of these basins. Hydrologic Modeling Assumptions The King County Runoff Time Series (KCRTS) model was used to determine peak flows in the basin for existing and future land use conditions. The input parameters used in the KCRTS model include soil information, a rainfall scale factor based upon project location, and the amount of pervious and impervious area located within the basin. The KCRTS software program then takes these parameters and combines them with over 40 years of rainfall data to produce hydrographs displaying flow rates represented for a number of storm events ranging from the 6 -month storm to the 100 -year storm event for each particular basin. The input parameters used in the KCRTS modeling analysis are as follows; Soils Outwash (as determined from the USDA's National Resource Conservation Service website; see Appendix B) Rainfall Sea -Tac Region with scale factor = 1.0 (2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual) Pervious/Impervious Areas The pervious and impervious areas for the Eastern 1-405 and Western 1405 basins were derived from survey information and proposed development plans as indicated earlier. Table 1 presents the land use coverage used for each basin. Figures 2 and 3 represent these areas graphically. The Eastem 1-405 basin is expected to be unchanged between existing and future conditions. GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. 2 APRIL 13, 2010 CD 0 r CD m V+ W c 2 n m m o 0 n :� (6 2 [B Tro m W [n fii m � A 0. CD —o Enn o c En cin n N y y f� o� o W 0 � W o N CD N W @ y w N' w 3 m c N N Ci 7 +D 7 CD m � 10 a W c 2 n m m o [n fii m � A n N y w 3 m w 7 Ci r v m � 10 a m C) � ■ ) - » 2 ƒ . } $ 2 «\ ° \ § k r� z R J \ . 03 & « A / } \ ( - _ m a ) ' / . ' & -n o Cr ] : $ < < ^ ^ . w. . oo±2t © cu0 ss >0 pE03 «\ &'D5°8 \ \cn \\§ ° >�( 4 / Current Land Use East 1-405 3.3 4.3 7.6 West 1-405 6.5 0.6 0.5 7.6 Land Use Total: 9.8 0.6 4.8 15.2 Future Land Use Node N2 6.5 0.6 East 1-405 3.3 4.3 7.6 West 1-405 6.83 0.77 7.6 Land Use Total: 10.13 0.0 5.07 15.2 The nodes selected for hydrologic and hydraulic modeling are shown in Figure 4. Table 2 shows the drainage basins flowing to each node, and summarizes the land use and areas for each node. Node N1 represents the Eastern 1-405 basin and Node N2 represents the Western 1405 basin. Table 2 -- Model Area Inputs Based Upon Land Use Coverage Effective Outwash Outwash Basin Impervious Current Land Use Node N1 3.3 4.3 7.6 East 1-405 Node N2 6.5 0.6 0.5 7.6 West 1-405 Land Use Total: 9.8 0.6 4.8 15.2 Future Land Use Node N1 3.3 4.3 7.6 East 1-405 Node N2 6.83 0.77 7.6 West 1-405 1 Land Use Total: 10,13 0.0 5.07 1 15.2 Downstream Backwater Condition: All hydraulic scenarios were modeled using the backwater conditions in May Creek which discharges to Lake Washington approximately 1,100 feet from the project's discharge site. This creek collects runoff from a large basin within the north portion of the city limits. Backwater elevations for the hydraulic modeling were obtained from the August 2002 Otak Technical Information Report entitled "Barbee Mill Preliminary Plat", as provided by the City. Cross section "D" was the backwater location selected from the May 1995 FEMA King County Flood Insurance Study located at the GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. 3 APRIL 13, 2010 Legend Eastern 1-405 Basin Modeled 24" Stormwater Line Input Node Modeled 12" Stormwater Line Modeled Node/Manhole Western 1-405 Basin Input Node ® Eastern 1-405 Basin IN Western 1-405 Basin 0 50 100 200 Feet N3 intersection of May Creek and Lake Washington Blvd. North (see appendix C). The 100 -year flood elevation obtained from this Study resulted in an elevation of 25.7 (NGVD 29 datum). Converting this into the NAVD 88 datum, the backwater elevation used for the 25 -year and 100 -year hydraulic models was 29.26 feet. Conservatively, since the 25 -year flood elevation was not available, the 100 -year flood elevation was used for the 25 -year storm event. According to the Study, the 10 -year flood elevation is approximately 25 (NGVD 29 datum) which converts to 28.56 with the NAVD 88 datum. Therefore, a backwater condition of 28.56 elevation was used for the 2 -year and 10 -year modeling scenarios since the 2 - year flood elevation was not available. It should be noted that the elevation of Lake Washington fluctuates between winter and summer. The Army Corps of Engineers have documented summer elevation of the lake to be 18.8 feet NAVD88 and the winter elevation to be 16.8 feet NAVD88. It is presumed that the Flood Insurance Study took these varying elevations into consideration when obtaining the flood elevations of May Creek. Therefore, for the purpose of this hydraulic model, the 10 -year flood elevation of 28.56 was used to set the backwater condition for the 2 -year and 10 -year storms and the 100 -year flood elevation of 29.26 feet was used to set the backwater condition for the 25 -year and 100 -year modeling scenarios. Hydrologic Modeling Results The KCRTS model was run with 15 -minute timesteps for each of the 2 input nodes under both existing and future land use conditions based upon input parameters stated earlier. From these modeling runs, hydrographs were extracted for a minimum 24-hour time period surrounding the peak flow for each basin corresponding to the 2 -year, 10 -year, 25 -year and 100 -year storm events. Table 3 shows the peak flows for each of these storm events under both the existing and future land use conditions. The data from these hydrographs were inserted as "gauged inflow" tables within designated nodes in the XP-SWMM hydraulic modeling program. GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. 4 APRIL 13, 2010 Table 3 - Peak Flows for the 2 through I 00 -Year Storms 2 -Year 1 1 11 ._ak ._ Peak .. ak Flow Flowa s ••- Current Land Use Node N1 1.57 2.13 3.03 4.21 East 1-405 Node N2 3.10 4.20 5.86 7.71 West 1-405 Total: 4.67 6.33 8.89 11.92 Future Land Use Node N1 1.57 2.13 3.03 421 East 1-405 Node N2 3.25 4.42 6.16 8.12 West 1-405 Total: 4.82 6.55 9.19 12.33 Detention Requirements A threshold discharge area represents the area of runoff collected and treated within a project. A threshold discharge area was delineated to assist with detention calculations. Table 4 depicts the land use within the site's threshold discharge area which encompasses the east half of Lake Washington Blvd. to the east side of the proposed sidewalk. Table 5 displays the results of the KCRTS derived flows for the threshold discharge area during the existing and developed conditions. Per the City's current standards, the site is located within a "Basic Flow Control Area" and requires a flow control duration standard. This standard allows the existing flows to match current land use conditions instead of forested conditions. GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. 5 APRIL 13, 2010 As seen in Table 5, the difference between the existing land use condition during a 100 -year storm event (0.212 cfs) and the future land use condition during the same storm (0.305 cfs) is less than 0.1 cfs. Per the exceptions listed in Section 1.2.3.1.A of the manual, this project site is exempt from flow control restrictions due an increase of less than 0.1 cfs between the existing and developed 100 - year storm events. Hydraulic Modeling Qxnponents Once the hydrologic flows were determined, the flows were routed through a hydraulic model. The hydraulic model provides flow and water elevation at representative nodes, and is used to determine when the storm flows are contained in the pipe system and when overflow occurs. The existing Bush Roed Hatchings survey was utilized to determine the storm system in the Hawk's landing area to obtain elevation and location information to use in the hydraulic model. The survey information was then input into the hydraulic routing software program known as XP-SWMM, which uses the EPA SWMM engine for modeling. The surveyed information includes pipe lengths, pipe diameter, rim elevations and invert elevations and is shown in Tables 6 and 7. With pipe information placed into the modeling program, XP-SWMM was then used to route the current and future storm flows obtained from the KCRTS model shown in Table 6. Figure 4 depicts a schematic of the hydraulic model for the existing system. Each "node" represents a manhole. Only 2 of the manholes were chosen as "input nodes." These nodes are depicted in Figure 4 as "NV and "N2." Hydrographs were extracted from the KCRTS program, converted to a recognizable file format, and were then attached to each input node in XP- SWMM. GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. 6 APRIL 13, 2010 HWraulic Modeling Scenarios With extracted KCRTS hydrographs attached to the designated input nodes, the XP-SWMM program routed the flows from the hydrographs through the surveyed pipe information to help determine where pipes surcharge under various storm events. The model was prepared under both existing and future conditions as described below. The existing upstream and downstream pipe system and a new 24" pipe replacing the existing ditch was modeled using existing land use conditions in the two basins. This scenario was modeled with the 2 -year, 10 -year, 25 -year and 100 -year storm events using flows generated in KCRTS. 2. The existing upstream and downstream pipe system and a new 24" pipe replacing the existing ditch were modeled using future land use conditions. This run was done for the 2 -year, 10 -year, 25 -year and 100 -year storm events using flows generated in KCRTS. The 100 -year storm event was modeled for the future land use scenario to ensure that flooding would not occur on the surface. GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. 7 APRIL 13, 2010 Hydraulic Modeling Results Modeling results for Scenarios 1 and 2 (existing upstream and downstream pipes with a new 24" pipe under existing and future land use) can be found in the summaries provided in Tables 6 and 7. GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. 8 APRIL 13, 2010 y C O 1p ri /Q V W 3 H a CD v a 2 R �w a= UO } :+ r0 N N O� N N N N a C U i'Z. H rNNY�Y�1+oD 4 co [p [h aD O O co p W O C2, LL O T LL N N COO co N N V tm d U M T. O. T N n U } N O N M M1 00 M1 O W U N W LL W W W co Q C NW LL C M d C O O M w w Q h f7i a N (D OOrh O M V LO h hh M. h. C - O 'yf # 0 0 N LO LO u1 4 IS] Q1 T W IL IM N R S} Q O cfl M1 r M w (4 M V F v O O N [D Q co cc: c N O O CD cD CD V V V C N'X O O CD � V V V V V _0 W d �t O C' OCD(Da)�[n�M1- Lqm p O - a rn'u �ocD(DrnrnmMr� M V N M m M N r v r cc a W a V cC] CV C) S�1 C7 N T - Cc � � 0o ( o D 0 0 0 O O CO O It CD O NNNO(D O O a)0 Q a 0P p r P c c 0 0 o r moO O m V co Q N OOOO N N O O C �OCDO C7 C1 O ON in V r Q 0 0 0 0 0 W E Nle M1M1QcO CD (fl M R V h4'iN SD N cD N m u•>Ch0 N GoJ N '6 � N W C-QY N h CD h CD h CD LD c0 [p [p C.P CO CLS CD J N N N N N N N N N y O 0 M R mW V CDN V h�C7N r- r- hco m LCSM co Lo 2 N "•' IL m N m N co N CD N c4666N N N N N LD !b �W V SDN V - - N h -CD - CD - CDN O N-0) Q N m'o N CV CD N Co N CD N co N CD N C C 'Mui h NO M Lomb Co unCnOcy V) V) Zi s Q al h N Q CDto mvtn,n Ln O X w � J C CD Q- a R w a s E.- � N V V V V NNN V a N FL R rNNN M 0 � d 4V 04 zzZZZzz Nm Ch V Cn coM1t� M1 9E r zzzzzzz r N C6 V US co C A 7 N Z N Cl) V LO CD 3 OZ�Dzzzzzz� O O a eR y G cP N U? O �_ Lq u7 (!] W C: n N u7 O�q M M u7 M Lo M (n a o M M X � O o E co E w m D Z Z Z Z Z Z Z � C UN 0 c 0� Z NM Z Z V Z LoWfl- z Z l- Z M o 3Z w ca LU Ln � ut d W O M(m N U? MMM _co V N Q .- C co N ID Q. g C, co V a to -.1011 3 E � b a N � O 7 z Z Z Z Z Z (/) CL 7 � N 7 TNM Z Z Z It Z LOCO Z Z r R �w a= UO } :+ r0 N N O� N N N N O y# O O V N N N N N p W O r- FL � CIS y C V N N COO co N N rj S O Ca M m Q) m O m U N W LL y C O O M w w Q m m w )„ H O O T 0) a) 67 M. 0 Q' 'x O O N u7 4[7 to Lo Lo a r W LL IM N R S} Q O cfl M1 r M w (4 w - 91 a.- ' #O 0 UiM1 cqh V co cc: c N O r V V V C W LL _0 d �t a LM O. OCD(Da)�[n�M1- Lqm p O - V 4 M V N M m M N r O O 0o ( o D 0 0 0 C) O CO O It CD O NNNO(D O O a)0 q) N O[ r p r O O 0 0 0 0(D 0 0 0 N 0 D 7 LL E V hu7Na4 tin CSO � NW Nle M1M1QcO CD (fl M C 3 61 N CD N SD N cD N c0 N com N N GoJ N cc O O � @ 2 R mW V CDN V h�C7N r- r- hco m LCSM co Lo 7 O N "•' IL m N m N co N CD N c4666N N N N N LD s 7 w C 'Mui h NO M Lomb Co unCnOcy V) V) C a� J CD Q- a E._Tr N N V N V NN V V CV V NN V CL R co _ 0 N ME zzZZZzz N Ch V (n m M1 CR r N r N C6 V US co 0 Z 7 D Z Z Z Z Z Z 3 O a cP N U? O �_ u7 (!] _y C W n co V CO CO M _� M M M x X D w mo E w C O D Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O 3Z w o w Ln � ut E ("S M(m MMM _co Ma Q .- C co £ a to -.1011 3 W co 101 Q- N �El 7 z Z Z Z Z Z 0 U z LU ZQ'a y O Peak modeled flows seen in the pipes under the existing land use condition for the 100 -year storm varied between 0.1 cubic feet per second (cfs) on the upstream 12 -inch pipes (Nodes U1 and U2) to 11.8 cfs in the 24 -inch pipe at the downstream end near May Creek (Node N7)_ Likewise, peak future flows varied between 0.1 cfs near the upstream nodes (Nodes U1 and U2) to 12.2 cfs in the 24 -inch pipe downstream. Minimal flows were shown in the upstream nodes due to the fact that the flow for the Eastern 1-405 Basin was input downstream into Node N1. The upstream pipes were placed in the model to monitor the effect on the hydraulic grade line upstream of the project. As shown in Tables 6 and 7, a slight increase in flow occurred between the existing and future land use scenarios. This is due to a slight increase in effective impervious area from 64.4% (9.8 ac/15.2 ac) under current conditions to 66.6% (10.13 ac/15.2 ac) under future conditions. As depicted in Tables 6 and 7, most of the pipes experience flow beyond their capacity. However, due to the depth of the pipe and storage available within the manholes, no surcharging was experienced between the existing and future model scenarios. Table 8 displays the amount of freeboard available under each scenario. Table Node 8 — Freeboard Results Freeboard Available 1 Existing Conditions 2- 10- Year Year until Flooding 25- Year Occurs 100- Year (ft) I Future ' 2- i Year Conditions 10- Year 25- Year 100 - Year The elevations of nodes N2 through N5 should be verified with actual design plans to ensure flooding is not experienced during the 25 -year and 100 -year storm events. Water Quality Modeling Components To assist in determining water quality alternatives available for this project, the water quality flow was calculated using the KCRTS modeling software based on the impervious surfaces shown in Table 9. GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. 10 APRIL 13, 2010 Pollution Generating 18,470 19,950 1,4801" Impervious Surfaces (i.e. road): Non -Pollution Generating 0 7,450 7,450 Impervious Surfaces (i.e. sidewalk Total New Impervious Surface 8,930 1. Area used to determine the water quality treatment flow rate. Based on the Surface Water Design Manual, the project qualifies for the Basic Water Quality Menu however, the Manual states that the threshold to treat new and replaced impervious pollution generating impervious surfaces is 5,000 sf. Based upon page 1-4 and Chapter 1.2.8 of the City's Amendments to the Manual, utility trenches and overlay projects are not included in the "replaced impervious surfaces" definition. Therefore, the overlay and trench areas for this project do not need to be treated. With this exemption and since this project is creating 1,480 sf of new impervious surface which is below the water quality requirement threshold, the project does not need to incorporate water quality treatment. However, the City is interested in utilizing the 10' x 160' planter strip area north of the bridge to incorporate a water quality facility. Based upon the availability of this area, a number of alternatives were evaluated. Water Quality Treatment Facility Attematives Biofiltration Swale A biofiltration swale is one alternative to treating water quality for the project area. The project site is bound by the minimal slope available between the existing conveyance systems (0.008% slope). Since the slope is less than one percent and the groundwater is high (S&EE, January 2010), the Design Manual states that only a "wet biofiltration swale" should be considered. A wet biofiltration swale includes a ditch with vegetation appropriate for saturated conditions. The biofiltration swale would be located just south of the southern entrance to Hawk's Landing (Node 5 in Figure 4) and would extend to the north end of the existing 24" culvert that discharges to May Creek (Node 6 in Figure 4). This is a distance of approximately 160 lineal feet which meets the minimum required length of 100 feet needed for a bioswale. The biofiltration swale would need to have a minimum bottom width of 2 feet and side slopes of 3:1 for the water quality depth of 4". Above 4", the bioswale can have slopes of 2:1. Since the Swale would be a "wet biofiltration" swale with an allowable maximum depth of 4", a bypass would be necessary for high flows so a flow splitter manhole would be installed at Node 5 so that only the water quality flow to be treated would flow through the swale while the remaining flow would be conveyed through a 24" pipe GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. 17 APRIL 13, 2010 elsewhere. The two conveyance systems would connect at a new manhole installed at Node 6 (north end of the existing 24" culvert). The advantage to a biofiltration swale is that it is relatively low maintenance and provides an economic cost alternative in comparison to manufactured or cast -in- place systems. Wetvault A wetvault is a concrete vault that treats runoff by removing harmful particulates through settling. The wetvault can be combined with an oil water separator to increase water quality treatment. Beginning with the available water quality facility area to work with (i.e. 10' x 160' planter strip), per the Design Manual, the area of runoff to be treated in a vault that is 10' wide by 160' long x 8' deep would equate to approximately 10,000 square feet or 0.23 acres. This was calculated using three times the runoff estimated for the mean annual storm of 0.47" as determined from Figure 6.4.1.A in the Design Manual. Similar to the wet biofiltration swale, only the water quality storm would be diverted to the vault while the remaining runoff would be conveyed in a 24" pipe elsewhere. A flow splitter manhole would be used to divert the flow. The advantage to a wetvault is that access for maintenance is easily provided, However, the wetvault consumes a large territory underground, is costly to install as a pre -cast or cast -in-place vault, it tends to not be as effective with pollutant removal rates and may need to be maintained more than other water quality alternatives. StormFilter The StormFilter cartridge is a media based filter that removes polluted particulates from runoff and is typically housed in a vault or catch basin. The media within the cartridge may consist of leaf compost, pedite, zeolite, activated carbon or a combination thereof. StormFilter manufactures individual catchbasin filters that could discharge into the trunk line. Each catchbasin would provide for both collection and treatment of road runoff. The exact location of these catchbasins will be determined by the final road design layout. If five StormFilter units were used, treating approximately 0.02 cfs per unit, an area of approximately 0.6 acres of runoff could be treated. Maintenance associated with the StormFilter typically consists of inspecting the cartridges once a year and replacing the media cartridge if necessary. This can be costly however, the StormFilter is advantageous due to its efficient removal rates which may exceed those presented by other water quality alternatives. It also requires less space than a bioswale and wetvault. GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. 12 APRIL 13, 2010 Filterra The Filterra is a stormwater biofiltration system that filters polluted particulates through a specially designed filter media mixture. The Filterra unit is installed along the curbside and houses landscaping items such as a small tree. The tree is installed within a 4'x 4' concrete box that contains the filter media which is used to filter pollutants such as petroleum, heavy metals, TSS, bacteria, and phosphorus. The clean, filtered water then flows through a drain at the bottom of the concrete box and discharges to a stormwater conveyance system. The Filterra unit has been given a General Use Level Designation by the Washington State Department of Ecology with the provision that the Filterra unit processes a minimum of 91 % of the influent runoff being collected. Using DOE's WWHM3 modeling software, modeling results reveal that this project would require five 4' x 4' Filterra units to treat the 19,950 square feet (0.46 acres) of impervious surface flowing to the units. The Filterra unit would also need an overflow catch basin just downstream from the Filterra unit so as to provide an overflow bypass for large storm events. Maintenance associated with the Filterra unit typically consists of inspecting the units once to twice a year which may then lead to removal of trash and debris as well as the upper layer of mulch. Approximately 3-4 bags of mulch would be needed to maintain the unit. Like the StormFilter, the Filterra unit may be advantageous due to its efficient removal rates which may exceed those presented by other water quality alternatives. Likewise, it requires less space than a bioswale and wetvault. However, it should be noted that the City has not approved Filterra units within their 2009 Amendments to the King County Surface Water Design Manual and would require a variance if used. Rain Garden The City has adopted rain garden standards in Section 6.7.1 of the Amendments to the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual. In reviewing these standards, the area available for a water quality treatment facility (i.e. 10' x 160' just north of the bridge) can be utilized to treat approximately 2,700 sf which equates to the road runoff area betweens Node 4 and 5 in Figure 4. The rain garden would consist of 18" of amended soil which would consist of an imported sand with compost mixed in. Above the amended soil, a six inch ponding depth would be available for runoff diverted from the road. An overflow riser would be located at the top of this ponding depth and connected into the 24" conveyance system. A rain garden measuring 140' in length with a bottom width was modeled in WWHM per City standards. Due to the available area's narrow width, the pond was modeled using 1.5:1 side slopes to give it a top width of 95. Using the NRCS soils shown in Appendix B, a short term infiltration rate of 1 in/hr was input into WWHM. Since the side slopes were greater than 2:1, the wetted surface of the slopes could not be modeled for infiltration. With this input, the WWHM model revealed that 100% of the runoff from the 2,700 square foot area could be infiltrated through the bottom of the rain garden. The City's standards state that a rain garden should have a minimum 3' separation between the GRAY & OSBORNE. INC. 13 APRIL 13, 2010 groundwater table and the bottom of the pond unless there is less than 5,000 square feet of impervious surface flowing to the pond. If less than 5,000 square feet is flowing to the area, a minimum separation of 1' is allowed. Based on the groundwater elevations determined from the Geotechnical Report for this project, it is recommended that the City diverts less than 5,000 square feet of impervious area to the rain garden. It is necessary that the rain garden be planted with plants that can sustain being saturated while also tolerating drought conditions. Table 10 depicts which plants may be utilized within the rain garden to meet these conditions. Table 10 - Rain Garden Common Name Western mannagrass Plants Spacing(On Center) Seed Velvetgrass Seed Shortawn foxtail Seed Water foxtail Seed Spike rush 4 inches Slough sedge 6 inches or seed Sawbeak sedge 6 inches Sedge 6 inches Slender rush 6 inches Water parsley 6 inches Hardstem bulrush 6 inches Watercress 12 inches Small -fruited bulrush 12 inches Maintenance for rain gardens include checking them annually to ensure the overflow is free of debris and in good working condition. Erosion channels or bare spots within the garden shall be stabilized with soil, plants, or mulch. Any dead vegetation should be replaced and noxious vegetation shall be removed immediately. Additional Water Quality Treatment Facilities Numerous other water quality treatment facilities exist but are not applicable to this project. A sand filter is high in maintenance and is not recommended for this area. Inadequate space is available for a filter strip, wetpond, or a wetland. So based on particular site constraints, these water quality treatment alternatives were not considered. Treatment Facility Costs The costs associated with the identified water quality alternatives are listed in Table 11. The costs listed are approximate installation costs. GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. 14 APRIL 13, 2010 11 — Water Quality Treatment Facility Costs ApproximateTable • Maintenance Cost Cost Wetvault $60,000 Medium Filterra $65,000 Medium StormFilter $10,000 (1 cartridge) High $50,000 5 cartridges) Wet Biofiltration Swale $20,000 Low Rain Garden $10,000 Low For hydraulics, a 24 -inch pipe in front of the new Hawk's Landing Development would meet the City's criteria of preventing flooding during either a 25 -year storm event or a 100 -year storm event under future conditions. For water quality treatment, using the preferred water quality facility area, it is recommended that the City install a wet bioswale. The bioswale would treat the road runoff collection area just north of the bioswale and would provide the City an economical option both in terms of installation and future maintenance. Likewise, if space becomes limited, it is recommended that the City use a single StormFilter catch basin toward the south end of the project site (see Figure 5). The StormFiiter provides a relatively economic option while minimizing the amount of property needed. It is also likely to provide a high efficiency removal rate for pollutants coming from Lake Washington Blvd. GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. 15 APRIL 13, 2010 z ZMOR Z4� 01 z E- F 4i Q AQQ. f� o APPENDIXA BASIN FIGURE FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE I-405/NE 44I" ST. INTERCHANGE PROJECT GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. 1 FEBRUARY 26, 2010 m o� - z y�ym =z �; z [ z� mr m T,� P F rn n m e � C2 4 5 R x co 2 � N Q m FO Fil � * . 1 SIX, SOIL MAP FROM USDA GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. 2 FEBRUARY 2B, 2010 V 00 CL 7 z eb n cr rD 0 0 O O O `tom A $m L L L D � i 2 w o C y uRi w aTi n �o� rs oPy y r y O 7 a y Q cn a 9 � U O W Q oQ a J a T `tom A $m L L L APPENDIXC 1995 FEMA KING COUNTY FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY INFORMATION GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. FEBRUARY 26, 2010 • STREET z 3 m CAMAS AVENU irORTHEAST STREET d go m z —� 47°34'00" I22°Ir15" To determine if flood insurance is aysiWe, contact an insurance agent Or calf the National Flood Insurance Program ai 16001638 63MM, APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 54D o Soo NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 664 OF 1725 [SEE mAP INDE7( FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) CONTAIN COMMUNnY NUMBER PANEL SUFFN KING COUNTY, UNINCORPOAATEO AA 530071 065 F RENTON, CFtV OF 5900w 0664 F MAP NUMBER 53033CO664 I: MAP REVISED: MAY 16, 1995 Federal Emergency Management Agency Appendix B otak 122011'15" —, 47031'52" .x to J �w a Cr O O U Z� 0 r Z Z LU ::) f= O LL U O z F Y U -0 AMAS RENTON 530088 I •� XO E X 4211 0 a LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATED BY 100 -YEAR FLOOD ZONE A No base flood elevatihan determined. 70NE AE Base fSood efevaliorhs determined. ZONE AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet tushalhy areas of ponding]: base tkhod elevations determined. ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (0y'k* sheet now om sloping terrain]: average depths determined_ For areas of alhrvial fan 4nodin& velocities also determined. ZONE A99 To be protected from 100 -year flood by Federal &)ad Protection system under construction; no base elevalions delermined. ZONE V Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave action]; no base flood ekvafions determined. ZONE YE Coastal flood with vetooty hazard ]wave ® xtionl: base flood elevations determined. FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE w - OTHER FLOOD AREAS ' ZONE X Areas of 50D -year llood: areas of 100 -year flood with average depths of leas than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mite; and areas protected by I.. from IOD -year good. OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to be outside 500 -year floodplain. ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards arc undetemuned. UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS tendix B otak tiled kdentified Otherwise 1983 19W Prorated Areas Coastal barrier areas are norm^ located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas. Hood Boundary Floodway Boundary Zone D Boundary aounetl Spacial Flood Tres, Hazard Zones. and Boundary Hazard Dividing Areas of Different Coastal Base Flood Elevations within Spacw Flood Hazard Zones. Base Flood Elevation Line; �513- Elevation in Feet. See Map Wax for Elevation Datum. p p Cross Secdrm Line One flood Elevation in Feet IEL 967) Where UNkwm Within Zone. See Map Index for Elevation Datum. RM7 X Elevation Reference Mark • M2 River Mile Horizontal Coordinates Based on North 97007'30". 32022'30" American Datum of 7977 (NAD 27) Pmiec[ion. NOTES This map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program: it does not nm—*rjv "Yl"wv ail mm.q auhiem to goodrma_ Dar11euwW ham local drainage AP] Special Flood Coastal base I the effects of from #10"a�ran.r tk— n]ammnrr tendix B otak JOINS PANEL 0675 n ZONE X V) D Q N� z LIMIT OF 1 DETAILED STUDY ,�0 V Z 495 W z 2 ZONE X ¢ w Y z May Creek V ONE AE xx G f� 40TH STREET #RM210 A4 ZONE X O � � a ? O z F �] �T MEADOW pVE NORTH ix 47 NORTH 38TH STREET 2 w I z . ¢ w Z NORTH 37TH STREET 52 z NORTH 37TIi STREET 4 Z LIJ � J � z a NORTH 38TH STREET 32 NORTH 36TH STREET z z KIN �2 NORTH 35TH STREET a UNINCORI 3 _ 0 4 qIL NORTH 34TH STREET -Z 6 t z z j May m NORTH 33RD PLACE w Creek 72 ZONE X NORTH 33RD STREET ZONE X w � M7 M NORTH 32ND STREET NORTH 32ND STREET ZONE M M z r a NORTH MST STREET c ZONE NORTH 30TH STREET NORTHEAST 30TH STREET ZONE X u _ NAi Nate: Datum = 1929 NGVD AWen&x 13x Scale: 1" = 500' otak IMTS i !Y a I 1 Big FLOG INSUI 'ISTUD KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS VOLUME 1 OF 3 COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER AURURN.CITY OF ........... 530073 BELLEVUE,CITY OF . ... ... 530074 BLACK DIAMOND.TOWN OF .... 530272 BURIEN.CITY OF ............ 530321 CARNATION.TOWN OF ....... 53007$ DES MOINES.CITY OF ........ 530077 DUVAL.TOWN OF ........... 530282 ENUMCLAW.CITY OF ........ 530319 FEDERAL WAY.CiTY OF ....... 530322 ISSAOUAH.CITY OF ......... 530078 KERT.CITY OF ............. 530080 KING COUNTY, UNINCORPORATED AREAS 530071 KIRKLAND.CITY OF ........... 530081 LAKE FOREST PARK,CITY OF ... 530082 NORMANDY PA KC1TY OF .... 530084 NORTH BEND,CITY OF ........ 530M PAOFK:,CITY OF ........... 530086 REDMOND.CITY OF .......... 530087 RENTON.CITY OF ........... 530088 SEATLJE,CITY OF............ 530089 SEATAC,CRY OF 530320 SKYKOMISH,TOWN OF .....:. 530236 SNODUALMlE.CITY OF ....... 530090 TUKVaA.CTIY OF .......... 530091 WOODINVILLEXITY OF M324 REVISED:'MAY 16,1995 Federal Emergency Management Agency 0 0 Appendix B utak .0 aJ 0 g N 0 Appendix B utak a a a a 0 J LL V Z W a as LLI L L2 W z Z Q V O OC W QV Wagw ZO LLI c w �- Q ao.J ur N ' +r1 .tOON W10%0nOv CsN 0•4Q'00-4+ 00►pn0�-i O Q 0 0 0 O G O v O O 0 QC x� W1NMr►NOoO.D�MNn�p.7NOw-4mMN.--4Ctir,wtn Q •-1 N ("i tn T M W1 O N W1 W1 %o IA M %a Ln D m %o N IA O W1 W1 10 0J NNNNN(nm-4- t -It %^%OMMCD +�-(NN(" %T 0 U _ W z L Q W W V, LL. MnOulaOGd]. . . . ..-r.nW ta0a0NNTOaC. m 6A =o .--4-4cn��NW1O.-6&nwlt%0 W1c"'1W1WN�QM%DNItaLmLmQ N o N N N N cwt irn cn +7 �T IT in coOO +-- in %o i Im M M M 1 N N m r7 8 .--1 .--1 .-1 ri r-1 ri r -F Q 3 0 g papMnOv1000GOCl! N 1-4 'D W.4 wwC4NCtidGO.t .-i .--1 M W1 M N U1 O 14 IA IA %T % W1 M 4 W1 .d 0► •D N .t O W1 W1 Q IT In %0 C 0+ O .--I .a yWr W1.oo0CyNaQO•-((+1nLf! .�n•D�otT�ndtMvlQ+a+00vM Wpv W%encor-ntoOnW1M%D%0n.oM.'t0%rn000�N N Ctdo0IC -4 O ZZa Q coMON4-4 O n M W1 C� M M M 00 M N O_4 W1 . 400(n -4O.-4 O QCQ Q LL W1ell Mr -(N IAwN%CwMt'.-aNwf-C,4'AMC1%Dw0f-O("1 .4 N .-i .--1 .-1 .--1 .-1 .-4 -4 ra .--1 .-1 .-4 N .i —4 .-1 o N J LL. r� oW BONN.-1Oi70ell W1-ti+101C+1O1NO{+iMONGOF1nloo NN cn%D.7.Ym-4-(N ('1co'$r- mMN7.TMMMN NTNC"Ln%7 .t.O.t Wlr4 MID N nfncoT CtLn%Dm•4 N%Odw-4dcg.o N •-1 r1NNM M.t ul +nen M 0 C4 V) m.r-%T W1 V>�D r, co 0%0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V � oC d H l7 Z doi O t2 v V 04CYW0E- >2FX3• N Y. a. .0 aJ 0 g N 0 Appendix B utak a a a a 0 J LL V Z W a as LLI L L2 W z Z Q V O OC W QV Wagw ZO LLI c w �- Q ao.J ur )GROAVW sn3e7 031V806803NI ONV CA_ Q J j� fj S 311AONa Cooli AZIN3`JV 1N3W3VVNVW AWN3Stl3H3 lVd3133: i I It rG a F cc m • I _ �r L, -(--r -t-I-j , T Y ul Lu n rna rj :TT 7T -1-t ;'-i 7 I ? 17 r Y'r'+ • a--h'' t-� � 7"r'— � I i I -.-r i , 17 + T � � ri..t� rT .-I--� t [ _ _ -7 rr� it - $_ i r f rr,r 44 F f {— . jl ' : �,r1 t t'ti r-- TT LL �— s I _ ' j- Al III r U II -1 i if .ate ., j [ {, 14 b - I 4 r Irl �+ C? * T ( 1 z:_ 3 --i-r} i'r-rr 1-7... I i r.,.,r ..i' _ :' 1`I-' IJ�T.' r-+ •} - 7r}+I 1 r} Y i I r [I++-r'Y r t? Z 7.}�..P I_-__� 4-4^, cog -T' 7" rT -i-; -1-,r�� S�-, T­ -; r pp p p pp O o Or � lCASN 193:0 NOLLWA313 APPENDIX D KCRTS INPUT AND OUTPUT FILES GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. 4 FEBRUARY 26, 2010 LWedetl.out KCRTS Command ------------- CREATE a new Time series ------------------------ Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location : sea -Tac Computing Series ex-detl.tsf Regional Scale Factor 1.00 Data Type Reduced Creating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STOF60R.rnf Outwash Forest 0.16 acres Loading Time series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STOG60R.rnf outwash Grass 0.16 acres Loading Time Series File:C:\KC—SWDM\KC_DATA\STE16OR.rnf Impervious 0.42 acres -------------- Total Area 0.74 acres Peak Discharge: 0.212 CFS at 6:00 on ]an 9 in Year 8 storing Time series File:ex-detl.tsf Time Series Computed KCRTS Command ------------- CREATE a new Time series ------------------------ Production of Runoff Time series Project Location Sea -Tac Computing Series pr-detl.tsf Regional Scale Factor 1.00 Data Type Reduced creating Hourly Time series File Loading Time series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STOG60R.rnf outwash Grass 0.11 acres Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STE160R.rnf Impervious 0.63 acres -------------- Total Area 0.74 acres Peak Discharge: 0.305 CFS at 6:00 on pan 9 in Year 8 storing Time series File:pr-detl.tsf Time series Computed KCRTS Command ------------- Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module ------------------------------- Analysis Tools command ---------------------- Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies ---------------------------------- Loading stage/Discharge curve:pr-detl.tsf Flow Frequency Analysis -------------------------------------------------------- Time Series File:pr-detl.tsf Project Location sea -Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:pr-detl.out Analysis Tools command ComputePEAKSand Flow Frequencies ---------------------------------- Page 1 Lwadetl.out Loading Time Series File:ex-detl.tsf Flow Frequency Analysis -------------------------------------------------------- Time Series File.ex-detl.tsf Project Location:5ea-Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:ex-detl.out Analysis Tools Command ---------------------- RETURN to Previous Menu ----------------------- KCRTS Command ------------- exit KCRTS Program ------------------ Page 2 Page 1 ex-detl.out Flow Frequency Analysis Time series File:ex-detl.tsf ProjeCt Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis ------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.108 6 2/09/01 2:00 0.212 1 100.00 0.990 0.091 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.154 2 25.00 0.960 0.130 3 2/27/03 7:00 0.130 3 10.00 0.900 0.106 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.125 4 5.00 0.800 0.125 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.110 5 3.00 0.667 0.110 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.108 6 2.00 0.500 0.154 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.106 7 1.30 0.231 0.212 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.091 8 1.10 0.091 computed Peaks 0.192 50.00 0.980 Page 1 pr-detl.out ---Flow Frequency Analysis------- - - Peaks - Flow Frequency Analysi Time series File:pr-detl.tsf Project Location:sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates --- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 2 25.00 0.156 7 2/09/01 2:00 0.134 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.187 3 2/27/03 7:00 0.157 6 8/26/04 2:00 0.186 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.164 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.228 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.305 1 1/09/08 6:00 Computed Peaks 0.279 pr-detl.out ---Flow Frequency Analysis------- - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.305 1 100.00 0.990 0.228 2 25.00 0.960 0.187 3 10.00 0.900 0.186 4 5.00 0.800 0.164 5 3.00 0.667 0.157 6 2.00 0.500 0.156 7 1.30 0.231 0.134 8 1.10 0.091 0.279 50.00 0.980 Page 1 APPENDIX E DIGITAL XP-SWMM MODELING FILES GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. S FEBRUARY 26, 2010